The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/27/89"Feelings are everywhere - be gentle." -J. Masai AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 27, 1989 - Cauncil Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 6:30 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR ' June Williams MAYOR PRO TEM Roger Creighton COUNCILMEMBERS Jim Rosenberger Chuck Sheldon Etta Simpson CITY CLERK Kathleen Midstokke CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: CERTIFICATES OF APPRECIATION FOR POLICE RESERVES PRESENTATION BY THE COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION - Board President Missy Sheldon and Fundraising Chairperson George Schmeltzer. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the item is called. Citizen comments on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction will be provided time at the end of the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed 1 will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on June 13, 1989. (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the May, 1989 finan-' cial reports: 1) Revenue and Expenditure Report; 2) City Treasurer's Report (e) Recommendation to authorize the Mayor to sign the renew- al agreement with Los Angeles County for the maintenance and upkeep of the landscaped areas adjacent to the public library located at 550 Pier Avenue. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 15, 1989. (g) Recommendation to approve extension of audit agreement with Grant Thornton, 1988-89. Memorandum from Finance Administrator Viki Copeland dated June 19, 1989. Recommendation to approve amendment to position alloca- tion plan to delete one Administrative Aide position and add one Clerk Typist position in the Building Depart- ment, Business License Division. Memorandum from Per- sonnel Director Robert Blackwood dated June 19, 1989. (h) Recommendation to approve parking waiver for Surf Festi- val. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dated June 15, 1989. (i) Recommendation to receive and file update on acquisition of Greenbelt. Memorandum from Finance Administrator Viki Copeland dated June 20, 1989. (j) Recommendation to deny the following claims for damages and refer to City's Claims Administrator: 1) Kevin D. Berry, c/o Richard G. Berry, 205 Calle de Madrid, Redondo Beach, filed June 12, 1989; alleged injury sustained from collision between pedestrian and motorcycle. 2) Richard J. Kenny, 520 Paseo de los Reyes, Redondo Beach, filed June 15, 1989; alleged injury of bicyclist by rollerskater on bike path. (k) Recommendation to award contract for legal advertising to the Easy Reader for a period of 3 years ending June 30, 1989. Memorandum from City Clerk Katheen Midstokke dated June 20, 1989. (1) (m) (o) (s) (t) Recommendation to adopt a resolution adopting regula- tions for candidates for elective office pertaining to candidates statements submitted to the voters -at an election to be held on Tuesday, November 7, 1989. Recommendation to accept traffic signalimprovements as complete, CIP 85-138. Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Anthony Antich dated June 20, 1989. Recommendation to award bid for professional services for. CDBG Program Administration. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dated June 15, 1989. Recommendation to.reject all bids on contract for traf- fic control pre-emption, CIP 86-176. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 6, 1989. Recommendation to refer to staff the memorandum from Planning Commission to investigate the possibility of recycling program. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 19, 1989. Recommendation to award contract for Community Center fire alarm system, CIP 89-615. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 20, 1989. Recommendations to approve initial repair work to Old Prospect School. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dated June 1, 1989. Recommendation to receive and file report on emergency sewer repair. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 20, 1989. Recommendation to express intent to purchase School Dis- trict surplus land formerly used for South and Prospect Heights Schools. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated June 22, 1989. Recommendation to award bid for Excess Workers' Compen- sation insurance to General Reinsurance Corporation. Memorandum from Risk Manager Robert A. Blackwood dated June 20, 1989. Recommendation to ing spaces in the from Public Works 1989. adopt resolution for handicapped park - downtown business area. Memorandum Director Anthony Antich dated June 13, Approval of modification to L. A. County Lifeguard Head- quarters to house emergency 911 equipment. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated June 22, 1989. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3 (a) ORDINANCE NO. 89-991 - AN ORDINANCE ORDERING CERTAIN CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED AND MAINTAINED FOR TH FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1989. For adoption. ilk, (b) ORDINANCE NO.• 9-993 - AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 2-2.27 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE, "APPEAL FEES, CITY COUNCIL APPEAL OF COMMISSION •DECISIONS NOT SUBJECT TO FEES, "TO RELOCATE THE APPEAL FEE PROVISION FOR LAND USE MATTERS IN THE MUNICIPAL CODE, AND WAIVING APPEAL FEES WHEN AT LEAST TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS SPONSOR REC $ DFfRATION OF A COMMISSION DECISION. For adoption. t yfffc (c) AN URGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLED "FIRE PREVENTION CODE", BY ADDING THERETO A•PROVISION PROHIBITING THE USE OF FIRE- WORKS WITHIN CITY LIMITS. For waiver of full reading and adoption. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Ste a Wisni wski dated June 22, 1989 J2Z1 s1) 3. ITE S REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) Letter from Roger Bacon, Park Pacific Shopping Center, dated May 18, 1989, re. skateboarding on privately owned commercial property. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. STATUS REPORT AND EXTENSION OF THE MORATORIUM ON PROJ- ECTS IN THE R-2 ZONE THAT EXCEED 25' IN HEIGHT AND ARE BORDERED ON THE EAST BY THE R-1 ZONE AND AN AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE THE R -2B ZONE. Memorandum from Planning Direc- tor Michael Schubach dated June 19, 1989. 6. REVIEW OF DELINQUENT REFUSE CHARGES FOR THE PURPOSE OF PLACING SUCH CHARGES AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILL. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated June 12, 1989. HEARINGS 7. RECONSIDERATION OF BILTMORE SITE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDA- TION CHANGING THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE ZONING OF THE PUBLICLY OWNED PORTION OF BILTMORE SITE FROM SPECIFIC PLAN AREA TO OPEN SPACE FOR THAT PORTION WEST OF BEACH DRIVE AND TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND C-2 FOR THAT PORTION EAST OF BEACH DRIVE BETWEEN 14TH AND 15TH STREET. Memo- randum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 22, 1989. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. RECOMMENDATION FROM CABLE TV BOARD RESULTING FROM COM- MUNICATION SUPPORT CORPORATION'S COMPLIANCE AUDIT, ANAL- YSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated June 19, 1989. 9. EXTENSION OF THE REFUSE CONTRACT WITH BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES. Memorandum from Building and Safety Direc- tor William Grove dated June 20, 1989. 10. RECOMMENDATION RE. RECLASSIFICATION PROCEDURE. Memoran- dum. from Councilmember Roger Creighton and Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated June 20, 1989. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) (b) Selection of Council sponsored ballot measures for the General Municipal Election on November 7, 1989 A. Unleashed dogs on railroad right-of-way. B. Biltmore Site - Task Force/Planning Commission Recommendation Direction to City Attorney to prepare wording. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated June 20, 1989. Approval of representative to Beach Cities Coalition for Alcohol and Drug Free Youth. (Requested by Mayor June Williams). (c) Report on Planning Commission attendance, and consider- ation of making changes in ordinance re. absences, and acceptance of resignation.Memorandum from Planning Di- rector Michael Schubach dated June 19, 1989. (d) Watchdog initiative petition: 1) Report from City Attorney re. legality of Watchdog initiative. 2) City Clerk's declaration of sufficiency of petition. 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. ADJOURNMENT CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS Where there is no vision the people perish... 'HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME:- By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. CITY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are'borne-by visitor/users; led by a City Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers THE'HERMUSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach bas the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. Tbe• Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. • GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. • Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing tbereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on•certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal • requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government•revenues and/or public conduct. All . ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week later'Council.may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. • . Written Communications The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting. Miscellaneous Items and Reports -.City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items•to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of the City Council may place items on 'the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Mattera of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 •� The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business• district. PROPOSAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Technical, Administration, and Implementation Assistance Community Development Block Grant Program Prepared By MARK BRIGGS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 505 N. Tustin Avenue, Suite 282 Santa Ana, California 92705 May 20, 1989 15th ANNIVERSARY May 20, 1989 Ms. Alana Mastrian-Handman Assistant City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 RE: Proposal for CDBG Technical Assistance Dear Ms. Mastrian-Handman Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc., is pleased to submit this Proposal for technical assistance with administration and implementation of your CDBG program for the 1989-90 program year. MB&A has been involved with the CDBG program since its inception in 1974 and has continuously worked with cities participating in the program through the Los Angeles County Community Development Commission. As you know, MB&A has been providing CDBG services to the City of Hermosa Beach during the past year. We have enjoyed working with the City and staff in developing and implementing a variety of CDBG funded projects that will provide beneficial programs to the residents of Hermosa Beach. We look forward to continuing our relationship with the City. If you have any questions concerning this Proposal, please do not hesitate to give me a call. BKB/ajy H.Beach/51089 MARK BRIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Sincerely, I( - es,,,,,) Bryon K. Baron Senior Vice President 505 N. Tustin Avenue, Suite 282, Santa Ana, California 92705 (714) 550-0390 1974 -1989 15 YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR SECTION I WORK, PROGRAM The Work Program set out below covers all of the items addressed in the Scope of Work section of the RFP. The Work Program covers both program administration and program implementation assistance for a twelve month period to begin July 1, 1989. As indicated in the RFP, the contract could be extended for an additional two years, on an annual basis, with new negotiated work programs and fee schedules. Mark Briggs and Associates has been providing program implementation and administration assistance to cities since inception of the Community Development Block Grant program. MB&A also provides similar services to cities participating in the Los Angeles County CDBG program which gives the firm broad experience in dealing with the County's Community Development Commission. While the Work Program listed below covers the items requested, there are always changes that occur throughout the program year which cannot be anticipated. MB&A, as it has in the past, is committed to work with the City staff to respond to these unforseen changes, even though the items may not be covered in the Work Program. I. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION ASSISTANCE A. ANNUAL APPLICATION PROCESS MB&A will work with City staff to review existing CDBG programs, to determine needs and to develop programs to be included in the City's 1990- 91 program year. The review of existing programs will include an analysis of funds expended and possible amendments to existing programs, if required. In addition, MB&A will prepare reports on the status of the existing programs, needs assessments, and reports on the programs to be included in the 1990-91 program year. MB&A's experience with program eligiblity issues will be beneficial as the City looks at new programs or changes. We can provide the City with the input that will ensure that the recommended programs are eligible. Assistance in the application process will also include preparation of public hearing notices and preparation of the Draft and Final Statements of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds. In addition, we will prepare and submit the associated documents required by the County CDC within their stated time frames. We will also work with City staff to determine the level of environmental clearance required of new projects. B. BUDGET DOCUMENTATION The County CDC process requires the City to prepare detailed budget information for each of the CDBG funded projects prior to the drawdown of funds. MB&A will work with the City staff to develop the Project Description and Activity Budget forms as required by the County CDC. MB&A's experience will be beneficial as we work with the City staff in developing the specific project budgets. With the CDC's limit on adminis- trative costs, it is critical to the City to be able to distinguish between eligible administrative costs and eligible project costs. C. GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT The City must submit information annually to the County CDC that will be used in the County's Grantee Performance Report. Over the years, the County has requested various levels of information from the cities for the GPR and, during the past several years, has required cities to file a complete HUD GPR packet of information. To assist in the gathering of data for the GPR, it is extremely beneficial to the City if the required information is gathered and maintained throughout the program year in a format which will be useful to complete the GPR forms. MB&A will work with the City of Hermosa Beach to develop program records which facilitate the gathering of data for the GPR. Our many years of experience in working with GPR's has allowed us to provide our clients with the proper formats for recordkeeping to make the preparation of the information for the GPR an easy matter. We will continue to work with the City staff to maintain, and change if required, their recordkeeping procedures to ensure that the necessary documentation required for the GPR is available in a useable format. D. PROJECT- AMENDMENTS It has been our experience in designing and implementing CDBG programs throughout the years that most projects have to be amended from time to time to adjust to the changing needs within the community. For example, certain housing rehabilitation programs may have to be amended if changes in the economy impact interest rates for market rate and BMIR loans. MB&A has experience in preparing program amendments which meet the County CDC processing requirements. We will work with City staff to review projects to determine whether they are meeting their goals and, if not, to determine possible program alternatives. If specific project amendments are required, we will work with the City staff to develop the necessary documentation to be submitted to the County CDC. Depending on the type of amendment or program change required, such as a new project, we will assist with the development of amendments to the City's Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds, public hearing notices, budget justification information, and filing of documents with the county CDC. We are familiar with the several types of amendment processes utilized in the CDC program. For example, a line item funding change within a specific project that does not exceed 10% requires a process different from that required if funds were being transferred between or among projects. E. HUD AND COUNTY CDC ADMINISTRATION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Because MB&A has a variety of CDBG clients, we are able to stay current with HUD and County CDC program administration and reporting requirement changes. The firm's staff members attend a variety of HUD, County and other seminars and workshops throughout the year that provide us with the knowledge of what is currently happening or of changes that will be occuring in the CDBG program. We are able to provide our clients with the latest information which enables them to meet administration and reporting requirements. F. MEETINGS MB&A as part of its CDBG assistance, has always taken an active role with its CDBG clients in providing written reports and in attending meetings where CDBG items are being discussed. Since citizen participation is a part of the process, we ensure that our clients meet this program requirement as well. In addition, since we have several clients who are participating in the County CDC program, we attend the monthly CDC/City meetings and special workshops conducted by the CDC. Having several clients which participate in the CDC program, we are able to divide the costs of attendance at these meetings on a pro rata basis which benefits each city. G. MONITORING/AUDITS Because of MB&A's extensive experience with the Block Grant pro- gram and County CDC administrative procedures, we are able to provide assistance to our clients in preparing for HUD or County monitorings or audits. Since we know basically what the auditors or monitors are looking for, we can provide pre -monitoring or audit assistance by reviewing City records and information to help determine areas that might have to be improved prior to the monitoring or audit. Also, again because of our years of experience in dealing with HUD and CDC staff, we will work closely with the City to clear up audit and monitoring findings, and where required, will help support the City's position where it appears the findings are in question. H. MONITORING OF NON -PROFITS Since the City is funding non-profit agencies as part of their 1989-90 CDBG program, we will assist the City staff in the monitoring of these agencies to insure they are in compliance with CDBG regulations. Mark Briggs and Associates assisted the City with the development of the contracts between the City and the non-profit agencies and is familar with the level of monitoring that must occur. The firm has monitored other non- profit organizations as part of their services to other CDBG client cities. I. PREPARATION OF RFP'S The CDBG program requirements necessitate the City go through a formal request for proposal for professional services when they are being funded with CDBG funds. MB&A has prepared a variety of RFP's for their clients, including RFP's for architectural and engineering services, handy- man programs, and general consultant services. In preparing the RFP's, there are specific items that must be included and requirements which must be met. We can help the City prepare requests for proposals which are complete and which comply with HUD and County CDC requirements including compliance with OMB Circular A-102. J. SEMI-ANNUAL, ANNUAL AND FINANCIAL REPORTS We will assist the City with the preparation of its semi-annual and annual reports for CDBG projects. Since we are familiar with the City's projects, we can complete the reports in a timely manner. We will also assist the City staff with the preparation of any other new additional reporting requirements that may arise during the term of the contract. We also have the expertise to assist the City with monthly financial reports that must be submitted to the County CDC. Dealing with several clients, our range of involvement with the internal financial processing varies with each client. In some cases, we do not get involved, while in other we have helped establish financial recordkeeping programs. We will get involved with the City of Hermosa Beach to the degree determined necessary by the City. II. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION ASSISTANCE A. HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAMS There is no other firm on the west coast that has MB&A's level of experience in housing rehabilitation programs. Since the beginning of the CDBG program, we have been involved in establishing and implementing a variety of housing rehabilitation programs and were the primary firm that worked with the statewide financial institutions in their development of CDBG funded BMIR loan programs. MB&A has developed a variety of housing rehabilitation programs designed to meet a particular city's needs including BMIR and deferred loans, rebates, matching grants and combinations of these programs. As part of our services in this work program we will review the effectiveness of the programs and, if required, make recommendations to modify or change them. We will work with City staff and the Housing Rehabilitation staff of the City of Redondo Beach to ensure the smooth processing and implementation of the programs. Because of our past relationship in working with the City and Redondo Beach to develop the housing rehabilitation programs, we can effectively provide the technical assistance required under the programs. This includes insuring that the Redondo Beach Rehabilitation staff are implementing the programs and providing documentation that meets CDC requirements. B. PUBLIC SERVICE PROGRAMS Since MB&A worked with the City in developing and identifying the public service non-profit agencies to be assisted during the 1989-90 program year, we are aware of their services and the levels of assistance to be provided. In addition, since we assisted with the development of the contracts between the City and non-profit agencies, we are familiar with what the requirements are for both the City and the agencies. MB&A has extensive experience in dealing with sub -contracts in which Cities fund non-profit organizations. There is a requirement that the City is responsible for insuring that the non -profits are implementing their CDBG funded activities in accordance with HUD and CDC requirements. This requires the City to monitor their activities throughout the year to insure they are maintaining the proper documentation. The firm will assist with the monitor of the non-profit agencies. We will assist with the development of an evaluation of each program prior to the end of the program year to help the City determine the effectiveness of each non -profit's CDBG funded services. This evaluation will assist the City in determining the advisability of continuing funding in the next program year and at what level of funding. In addition to the above, MB&A will assist with any program amendments that may be required for the Public Service programs throughout the year. These may arise due to monitoring findings or problems that may come about because these are new programs being funded with CDBG funds by the City for the first time. C. MARKETING AND PUBLICITY MB&A, with City staff and sub -contractor staff, will assist with the preparation of marketing materials, as required. In addition, if requested by City staff, we will prepare press releases and other publicity items. We have, through the years, developed a variety of effective marketing brochures for our client cities. MB&A has learned through experience that program implementation and marketing needs vary according to a program's level of activity. While new programs may require significant marketing, continuing programs needs will vary based on the demands and funding availability. We have the experience to assist the City with solid marketing programs at whatever level staff deems appropriate. D. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ON OTHER CDBG FUNDED PROGRAMS With the combination of our CDBG program experience and our assistance in helping the City during past year with its development of CDBG programs, we can provide the level of technical assistance the City requires to ensure implementation of all of its CDBG funded programs in a timely manner. We have been involved in all types of CDBG funded public works projects, parks and recreation projects, senior citizen centers, etc. and projects that have had multiple funding sources. Since our expertise is in program implementation, we take the role of facilitator and provide the required coordination between the City and their sub -contractors to ensure that projects are implementated and completed in accordance with City, HUD and CDC requirements. H.Beach2/51489 SECTION 11 MANAGEMENT AND STAFFING Mark Briggs and Associates personnel working with the City of Hermosa Beach on this CDBG work program will be Bryon K. Baron. Mr. Baron, a Principal and partner with MB&A, has over 13 years of experience with the Community Development Block Grant program and is well qualified to asist the City with its program. Mr. Baron has worked with the City of Hermosa Beach during the past year in assisting the City's re-entry into the CDBG program. Mr. Baron's resume is attached. While the above indicated individual will have primary responsibility for the services to be provided under the Work Program, we have also included the resumes of others in the firm who can provide back-up and specialized technical assistance if requested by the City. H.Beach2/51089 BRYON K. BARON EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND B.A. Political Science/Public Administration, California State University Long Beach M.P.A. Center for Public Policy and Administration, California State University Long Beach PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1978 -Present Senior Vice President, Principal, Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc. 1977-78 Associate, Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc. 1973-1977 Principal Planner, City of South Gate, California REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE Mr. Baron brings to the firm more than Sixteen years experience in planning, housing & commercial rehabilitation programs, economic development and downtown revitaliza- tion. While with the City of South Gate, California as Principal Planner, Mr. Baron was responsible for the City's CDBG program and was involved with financial institutions in establishing BMIR housing rehabilitation loan programs, project coordination to insure implementation, management of the City's CDBG staff and formation of the City's Redevelopment Agency. Since joining MB&A, Mr. Baron has been extensively involved in CDBG and economic development programs, with clients who are cities, redevelopment agencies and private sector developers. Activities range from working with the client staff and elected officials in planning, policy formulation, to working as an extension of staff to assist with all phases of project planning, financing and implementation. Work with a wide range of developers, has included the putting together of "pubic/private partnership" programs where projects were not initially feasible. These include the uses of a variety of public and private financial funding mechanisms. Part of his work has included dealings with all the major statewide financial institutions in establishing low interest loan programs for both housing and commercial projects. He has developed a variety of housing and commercial programs for clients, including the writing of implementation plans and training of City staff personnel. In addition, his activities have included implementation assistance to insure timely completion of all types of public works projects. As part of his activities, Mr. Baron has also been involved in the Urban Development Action Grant Program. This has included dealing with both the private and public sector clients in developing projects that meet financing, jobs and other program requirements. Other economic development activities include _ development of programs and applications for funding under the various Economic Development Administration programs, and the implementation of a public sector industrial development program. Housing activities have included dealing with financing and tax credits regarding senior housing projects. Mr. Baron has also been involved in all phases of citizen participation. This has included dealing with various cities' citizens advisory groups as part of the CDBG process to dealing with merchants associations and Chambers of Commerce in developing and marketing economic and commercial programs. Mr. Baron's local government experience and extensive involvement with economic development activities enables the firm to provide the kind of services needed in the areas of community and economic development. ref6/4-1488 MARK E. BRIGGS EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND B.A. Political Science, Alaska Methodist University Graduate Study, University of the Pacific PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1974 -Present President, Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc. 1970-1974 State Clearinghouse Director, Office of the Governor, Office of Planning and Research, State of California 1970 Local Government Specialist, Office of the Governor, Local Affairs Agency, State of Alaska 1967-1970 Officer and Special Agent, U.S. Army Intelligence, Washington, D.C. ASSOCIATIONS AND AWARDS Special Recognition Award Western Federal Regional Council San Francisco, 1974 Federal Highway Administration National Advisory Committee Washington, D.C., 1972 Certificate of National Merit, National Recognition Program for Community Development Excellence, awarded by the Secretary of HUD, 1986 Member, National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials Mr. Briggs' expertise comes from twenty years of public and private experience, including service in the Governors' offices in California and Alaska. In Alaska, as a local Government Specialist, he worked with problems faced by the State's constitutionally mandated regional municipalities (buroughs) as well as problems with small subsistance Eskimo villages. The broad variety of assignments required him to be flexible to deal with varying conditions and levels of sophistication. w 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 In California, Mr. Briggs operated the State Clearinghouse, where he reviewed all Federal and State grant program applications and developed mechanisms to coordinate the programs. A milestone program was the annual evaluation of the impact of the Federal Budget on California state and local jurisdictions. As a private consultant, he has provided consulting services to the Regional Office of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and to the Western Federal Regional Council for implementation services in California, Arizona and Nevada. At the local level, he has provided community development, housing and economic development evaluations, alternatives, operating and implementation services to Forty local government jurisdictions. Many of the largest cities in the country and California have utilized his services including the City and County of Los Angeles, San Diego, Sacramento, Santa Ana and Newport Beach in California, and Dallas, Texas, Charolotte, North Carolina and Bellingham, Washington outside California. The local services have included budgeting of local programs, grant preparation, performance report preparation, detailed implementation, program outreach and general administrative and management services. Housing programs of all types have been developed by Mr. Briggs. The rehabilitation methods have included below market interest rate loans, rebates and deferred loans for owner occupied and rental property. Mr. Briggs has helped two cities establish Housing Authorities, made application for the cities for Section 8 rental assistance allocations, handled participant outreach and screening and developed full operation manuals for the city staff use. Mr. Briggs has heen responsible for the development of the commercial rehabilitation programs in three cities and has been supervising Principal for eight commercial areas under contracts with Los Angeles County to implement a commercial revitalization program. His assistance included the initial merchant surveys and identification of the commercial area needs, developing program alternatives for the cities' review, holding group meetings where the alternatives were spelled out, providing the merchants with options, and discussing the applicability of IRS code 167(k), historic preservation tax allowances and leasehold provisions. He coordinated architectural and engineering efforts while working with merchants as logos for commercial areas were selected. Mr. Briggs then developed tailored programs for cities which included acquisition, relocation, public improvements, vacation of streets, commercial area reorientation, facade programs, free standing and internal rehabilitation programs, low interest loan and rebate programs. Mr. Briggs' experience in working with the private sector covers many years and includes work on more than fifty public/private partnership efforts. He has prepared numerous successful HUD Urban Development Action Grant and Economic Development Administration applications for new industrial, commercial, office, hotel and mixed use projects. Mr. Briggs has specialized in working on plant closure projects. Urban Development Grant funds have been used in conjunction with the closed U.S. Steel plant in Commerce, the closed Firestone Tire, Rubber plant in South Gate, and the closed Franciscan Pottery Plant in Los Angeles. Mr. Briggs is heavily involed in working with development companies to negotiate assistance programs with cities and redevelopment agencies. The projects are typically complicated, with special problems such as toxic waste or severe economic constraints. His track record in structuring an economic program to help make the projects feasible has resulted in a better than 95% success rate. Mr. Briggs is often asked to speak at national conferences or chair panel discussions. He has done so at national conferences of the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials, (NAHRO), The International Association of Shopping Centers (ICSC) and the Downtown Conference sponsored jointly by HUD and ICSC. ref4/4-1488 SECTION III PRIOR RELATED EXPERIENCE As indicated previously, MB&A has been providing CDBG technical assistance to the City of Hermosa Beach for over the past year. In addition, we currently provide, and have provided, services to a number of other cities participating in the Community Development Block Grant program. As indicated in the Work Program under Section I, MB&A has extensive experience with the CDBG program and with the County CDC program requirements. Listed on the following pages are client references and brief descriptions of the types of services we provide to each. H.Beach2/51089 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 REFERENCES CURRENT URBAN COUNTY CITIES City of La Puente 15900 Main Street La Puente, CA 91744 Contact Person: Mr. Rick Hartmann Director of Community Development (818) 330-4511 Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc., has been providing a wide variety of CDBG services to the City for over nine years. Besides providing overall general technical assistance, MB&A helped develop and amend their housing and commercial rehabilitation programs. During the City's 1986-87 program year, MB&A developed an Economic Development Fund (EDF) program which provides low interest loan CDBG funds for new commercial and industrial projects that create or retain jobs. The EDF program was the first of its kind developed by a City participating in the Los Angeles County Urban Program. Services provided also include all of the City's annual application documents, MOU documents, and other reports required by the CDC and HUD. City of Maywood 4319 East Slauson Avenue Maywood, California 90270 Contact Person: Mr. Ronald Lindsey Director of Building and Planning (213) 562-5000 Mark Briggs and Associates has also been providing a wide variety of CDBG technical assistance services for the City of Maywood. The City has been a client for over nine years. Over and above the development of housing and commercial rehabilitation programs, we have provide services that included implementation of the first Section 108 loan through the CDC, assistance with using CDBG funds to construct two neighborhood shopping centers, and use of CDBG funds in conjunction with a Section 202 new construction Senior Citizen Housing Project. The following is a list of other Urban County Cities, Small Cities, and Large Cities that MB&A has provided CDBG services for during the past twelve years. LARGE CITIES South Gate Pico Rivera Norwalk Sacramento Housing and Orange Redevelopment Agency Montebello Newport Beach URBAN AND SMALL CITIES Marysville Cudahy Bell Gardens Woodland Azusa Bell REF4/51089 SECTION IV PROFESSIONAL FEES Mark Briggs and Associates will perform the tasks in the Work Program for a fee not to exceed $12,000 for a twelve month period beginning July 1, 1989. The actual total could be under the amount depending on the extent of services requested by the City. As indicated in the City's RFP, after successful completion of the twelve month work program, additional two twelve month contracts can be negotiated that will include new work programs and fees. The City will be billed monthly for services performed during the previous month on a time and materials basis. Overhead of two times the actual hourly rates will be added. Principal I $ Principal II $ Secretary $ Plus overhead at two times the hourly rate. 41.97 hour 39.14 hour 12.26 hour Our fees and procedures are in conformity with applicable Community Development Block Grant regulations and with provisions of OMB Circulars A-87 and A-102. H.Beach2/51089 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California held on Tuesday, June 13, 1989 at the hour of 7:38 P.M. CLOSED SESSION pursuant to Govt. Code Sec. 54956(a) re: litiga- tion Smudanowski; Goodwin; Krueger; Fouce; Gotanda; and Wolcott. Real Estate Neg. with H.B. School Dist re: South School and Pros- pect Hts. Personnel Meet & Confer. Held at 6:04 P.M. Present: Creighton (arrived 6:12 P.M.), Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams. Absent: None PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Wilma Burt ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams Absent: None INTRODUCTION OF INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY CHARLES S. VOSE Interim City Attorney Charles S. Vose from the firm of Oliver,Stoever, Barr, & Einboden was introduced. ANNOUNCEMENT RECOGNIZING FLAG DAY, JUNE 14, 1989 An act of Congress on June 14, 1777 adopted the first official flag of the United States. On August 3, 1949, June 14 of each year was designated as National Flag Day. PROCLAMATION - Honoring 50th anniversary of Little League Baseball, and proclaiming June 11-16, 1989 as National Little League Week. The Mayor presented the proclamation to Jerry Littman, Hermosa Beach's Little League volunteer of the year. Mr. Littman gave baseball coffee cups to the Councilmembers. CITIZEN COMMENTS Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh St. - commented on item 1(m). Richard Sullivan - 824 Third St. - read submitted letter into the record regarding item 2(a). 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (s) with the exception of the following itemswhich were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (h) Rosenberger; (m) Sheldon; (n) Simpson; (s) Williams. Note: item (r) was withdrawn prior to the meeting. Motion Sheldon, second.Creighton. So ordered.. (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) .Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held •on May 22, 1989; 2) Regular meeting of the City Council May 23, 1989; 3) Special meeting of the City Council June 1, 1989. Minutes 6-13-89 1 ' (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 30125 thru 30129 inclusive and 30131 thru 30167 in- clusive, noting voided warrants 30134 thru 30136 inclu- sive and 30181. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the May, 1989 invest- ment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated June 6, 1989. (e) (f (g) (h) (i) Recommendation to authorize completion of sale of sur- plus land sold at public auction (634 1st St., 705 1st St., 704 1st P1.). Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated May 30, 1989. Recommendation to approve re -appointment of Mr. Scott Ingell to the Private Industry Council of the Job Train- ing Partnership Act. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated June 5, 1989. Recommendation to accept and file report regarding the audit and evaluation of Public Safety dispatch system. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated May 16, 1989. Recommendation to adopt resolution endorsing the ap- plication for FY 1989-90 Proposition A Subregional Incentive Funds for the Hermosa/Redondo joint Dial -A - Ride program known as the "WAVE". Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated June 6, 1989. Action: To adopt resolution No. 89-5273, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE SUPPORTING THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF RE- DONDO BEACH FOR FY 1989-90 PROPOSITION A DISCRETIONARY FUNDS UNDER THE SUB -REGIONAL PARATRANSIT INCENTIVE PRO- GRAM FOR THE "WAVE" DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM." Action: To approve staff recommendation with the under- standing that at the end of third year it be reviewed based upon service level or rider and cost per ride. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map. #19033 for a three -unit condominium at 1078 Monterey Boulevard. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 6, 1989. Action: To adopt resolution No. 89-5274, entitled, "A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #19033 FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1078 MONTEREY BOULEVARD, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." 2 Minutes 6-13-89. r' (j) (k) (1) (m) (n) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #19513 for a two -unit condominium at 610 Palm Drive. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 6, 1989. Action: To adopt resolution No. 89-5275, entitled, " A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #19513 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 610 PALM DRIVE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Recommendation to approve renewal of lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Project Touch for office space (Room 11) of the Community Center. Memora- num from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian- Handman dated June 1, 1989. Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Project Touch for additional office space (Room 3) in the Community Center. Memoran- dum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated June 1, 1989. Recommendation to approve selection of Purkiss Rose to develop Master Plan for Parks and Recreation in an amount not to exceed $33,978, waive any irregularities with regard to late submissions, and appropriate $8,978 from Prospective Expenditures to Dept. of Community Resources.. Memorandum from Community Resources Direc- tor Alana Mastrian-Handman dated June 1, 1989. Action: To approve staff recommendation and appropriate $8,978 for 1989-90 from Prospective Expenditures Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to receive and file Planning project timetable. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 6, 1989. Proposed Action: To have staff come back with a schedule on these items. Motion Williams, second Simpson- motion was subsequent- ly withdrawn. Action: Each Councilmember prioritize list and submit to City Manager by end of week; and add to list: Increasing the distance from residences for off -sale/ on -sale alcoholic beverage licenses. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered.' Final Action: To receive and file. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. •So ordered. - 3 - Minutes 6-13-89 (o) (p) (q) (r) (s) Recommendation to approve addition of the American Beach Volleyball League's 4 -man tournament to the list of beach volleyball tournaments held in Hermosa Beach this summer. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dated June 6, 1989. Recommendation to accept and file report from Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission regarding School District properties. Letter from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dated May 25, 1989. Recommendation to accept as complete slurry seal and asphalt street repair project, CIP 87-180 and CIP 88- 171. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony An- tich dated June 6, 1989. Action: To accept as complete CIP 88-170 and 88-171, Slurry Seal and Asphalt Street Repair Projects, complet- ed by Roy Allan Slurry Seal Inc. Authorize staff to: release the payment retention; release the faithful per- formance bond and the labor and materials bond; file a notice of completion; and accept, as complete, inspec- tion and contract administration services provided by Harris & Assoc. Recommendation to award contract for Community Center alarm system, CIP 88-604. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 6, 1989. This item was withdrawn prior to meeting. Recommendation to adopt three resolutions establishing traffic signal locations, establishing 12 -hour parking areas, and establishing curbside handicapped parking zones. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 31, 1989. Action: To adopt resolution No. 89-5276, entitled, " A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATIONS." Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered. Further Action: To adopt resolution No. 89-5277, entitled, ".A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING TWELVE HOUR PARKING AREAS." Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. Further Action: To adopt resolution No. 89-52/8, entitled, "A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING "COMMERCIAL AREA" CURBSIDE PARKING STALLS FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF DIASABLED PERSONS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 22511.7 AND 22511.8 OF THE CALIFRONIA VEHICLE CODE, AS HEREIN SET FORTH." Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. 4 Minutes 6-13-89 Final Action: To approve staff recommendation and refer right-of-way prohibited to vehicles (pedestrian streets) to the Planning Commission. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 89-990 - "AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO DELETE VIDEO SALES AND RENTALS IN THE C-1 AND C-2 ZONES, NEIGHBORHOOD COM- MERCIAL AND RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL AND APPROVING AN EN- VIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." For adoption. Supplemental letter from Richard Sullivan, 824 Third Street, dated June 10, 1989. Proposed Action: To adopt ordinance No. 89-990. Motion Creighton, second Simpson - motion was subse- quently withdrawn. Action: City Manager to resubmit to Council after per manent City Attorney has been appointed and has a chance to review the proposed ordinance. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items (h), (m), (n), (s) were discussed at this time but are listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) Letter from Shane McColgan, Pulse Fitness Systems, 934 Hermosa Avenue, Suite 11, Hermosa Beach, re. parking for expansion of business. (Requested by Mayor Williams). This item is on agenda of next Planning Commission Meet- ing and will be addressed at that time. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS 5. REVIEW OF GRADING PLAN AND EXTENSION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR POWER STREET SUBDIVISION, TRACT NO.. 30986. - Memorandum -from Public Works Director Anthony Antich. Supplemental letter from Betty Evans dated June 7, 1989. A staff report was presented by Director Antich. Addressing the Council ori this item were: Tim Zieman - representing Isco Industries Betty Evans - 1769 Valley Park Avenue - submitted pictures regarding flooding. Warner Lombardi - 1849 Valley Park Avenue Gordon Evans - 1769 Valley Park Avenue 5 Minutes 6-13-89 Action: To approve staff recommendations as follows: To require a subsequent environmental assessment and ap- prove a one year extension of the tentative map. Motion Williams, second Simpson. AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Simpson, Williams NOES - Sheldon A recess was called at 9:10 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:22 P.M. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6. CONSIDERATION OF 1989-1990 BUDGET AND FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PROGRAM, with resolution adopting budget and resolution establishing the appropriation limit for 1989-90. Memorandum from Finance Administra- tor Viki Copeland dated June 6, 1989. Supplemental let- ter from WATCHDOG dated June 12, 1989. A staff report was presented by City Manager Northcraft and Finance Administrator Copeland. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh St. - comments on budget. George Barks- 847 Third St., President of Hermosa Beach Sister City - requesting $1000 funding. The Public Hearing was closed. Action: To stop discussion regarding proposed parking on the Railroad Right -of -Way Motion Creighton second Williams. So ordered. Further Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5279, enti- tled, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET OF $15,682,372, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1989-90, amending to include the contribution of $1000 for membership to the "Clean the Santa Monica Bay Restortion Project" to be appropriated from Prospective Expenditures; and Granting a request of the Sister Cities.Association for $1000 to be used for low to moderate income exchange students on a reimbur-sment basis. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered. FurtherlAction: To adopt Resolution No 89-5280, enti- tled, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL APPROP-RIATIONS LIMIT OF $9,995,462, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1989-90" Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered. - 6 Minutes 6-13-89 Further Action: To receive and file the answers to questions raised at the workshop, except that on number twelve (12) staff report with alternative parking hours, perhaps six (6) on right-of-way near Clark. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So order. Final Action: To receive and file the revised summary of capital improvement projects, with understanding that no monies are appropriated for paved parking on railroad Right -of -Way. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered. 7. CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1989-1990, with or- dinance for waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 23, 1989. Staff report given by Director Antich and Assessment Engineer Patrick Rosetti. The Public Hearing was opened. No one coming forward to speak, the Public Hearing was closed. Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 89-991, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATED APRIL 18, 1989, PREPARED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 89-5259 OF SAID COUNCIL, AND THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ESTIMATE, DIAGRAM AND ASSESS- MENT CONTAINED IN SAID REPORT; ORDERING CERTAIN CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED AND MAIN- TAINED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1989." Motion Simpson, second Creighton. AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams NOES - None Final Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 89-991. Motion Simpson, second Creighton. So ordered. 8. CONFIRMATION OF FY 89-90 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT AS- SESSMENT, with resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 23, 1989. A staff report was presented by Director Antich. The Public Hearing was opened. No one coming forward to speak, the Public Hearing was closed. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5281, entitled, "A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING DIAGRAM, ASSESSMENT, AND LEVYING ASSESSMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1,1989 FOR THE STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT." ' Motion Simpson, second Rosenberger. So ordered. 7 Minutes 6-13-89 9. PROPOSED INTERIM ORDINANCE REQUIRING PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW OF HIGHER DENSITY CONSTRUCTION ON R-2 LOTS. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 6, 1989. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened, coming forward to speak was: Jerry Compton - 200 Pier Ave,. Suite #9 - Clarification Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 89-992, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM OR- DINANCE CONTROLLING DENSITY ON R-2 ZONED LOTS WHEN THE NUMBER OF UNITS EXCEEDS A MAXIMUM OF TWO UNITS PER EX- ISTING LOT FOR LOTS OF 3,500 SQUARE FEET OR GREATER, AND/OR WHEN THE NUMBER OF UNITS EXCEEDS MORE THAN ONE UNIT PER LOT ON ASSEMBLED LOTS OF UNDER 3,500 SQUARE FEET WITHOUT PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWS AND APPROVAL.' Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Final Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-992. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams NOES - None 10. PROPOSED ORDINANCE RE. CITY COUNCIL APPEAL PROCEDURE AND FEE. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 6, 1989. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened, coming forward to speak was: Jerry Compton - 200 Pier Ave., Suite #9 - Clarification Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 89-993, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 2-2.27 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE, "APPEAL FEES, CITY COUNCIL APPEAL OF COMMISSION DECISIONS NOT SUBJECT TO FEES", TO RELOCATE THE APPEAL FEE PROVISION FOR LAND USE MATTERS IN THE MUNICIPAL CODE, AND WAIVERING APPEAL FEES WHEN AT LEAST TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS SPONSOR RECONSIDERATION QF A COMMIS- SION DECISION." Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. AYES: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams.. NOES:. None Final Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 89-993. Motion Simpson, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Minutes 6-13-89 A recess was called at 10:45 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 10:55 P.M. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 11. RECOMMENDATION RE. USE OF MOTORCYCLES FOR TRAFFIC EN- FORCEMENT. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. North - craft dated June 8, 1989. Supplemental petition with 32 signatures entitled "Multi -Purpose", supporting motorcycles. A staff report was presented by City Manager Northcraft and Public Safety Director Wisniewski. Proposed Action: To approve staff recommendation number three (3). Motion Creighton - dies for lack of second. Addressing the Council on this item were: Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste - in favor of motorcycles Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh St. - supports motorcycles Proposed Further Action: To approve staff recommenda- tion number three (3) authorizing a continuation of the existing program of two motorcycle officers, and au- thorize $13,025 from Prospective Expenditures for the purchase of two motorcycles, with the understanding that the strictest discipline will be imposed for risk taking, etc. Motion Creighton, second Williams - motion was subse- quently withdrawn. Action: To approve staff recommendation number two (2) directing the continued limited use of motorcycles for traffic enforcement by directing that staff prepare a policy to come back designated to limit the hazard expo- sure to officers assigned to motors by such things as documenting and mandating beginning and ongoing training programs, first class equipment and maintenance pro- grams, and strong supervision procedures; and authorize $13,025 from Prospective Expenditures for the purchase of two motorcycles. Motion Sheldon, second Simpson. So ordered. • 12. RECOMMENDATION RE. RECLASSIFICATION PROCEDURE. (Oral report from Councilmember Roger Creighton and Personnel Director Robert Blackwood) Action: To continue this item for another two (2) weeks, with a written report to come back. Motion Sheldon, second Simpson. So ordered. 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - None 9 Minutes 6-13-89 • 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Vacancies - Boards and Commissions 1) Appointment to vacancy on Civil Service Commission for unexpired term ending July 15, 1992. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated June 6, 1989. Action: To nominate John Wisdom. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. Further Action: To nominate Mike D'Amico. Motion Rosenberger, second Simpson. Vote on Nominations: Creighton - Wisdom Rosenberger - D'Amico Sheldon - Wisdom Simpson - D'Amico Williams - D'Amico Final Action: To apppoint Mike D'Amico to the Civil Service Commission for an unexpired term ending July 15, 1992. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. 2) Authorization to advertise for one (1) Planning Commis- sion expiration of term ending June 30, 1989. Memoran- dum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated June 6, 1989. Proposed Action: To continue this item to the next meeting to be heard in conjunction with the attendance of the commissioners and possible action. Motion Rosenberger - motion was withdrawn. Proposed Further Action: To approve staff recommenda- tion number two (2) and also bring back Planning Commis- sioner attendance with possible action. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton - motion was subse- quently withdrawn. Action: To reappoint Commissioner James Peirce to the Planning Commission for a three (3) year term ending June 30, 1992. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Final Action: To bring back the item of Planning Com- missioner's attendance 'at the next meeting, including our current Ordinance regarding same. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. 3) • Authorization to advertise for three (3) Parks, Recre- ation & Community Resources Advisory Commission expira- tion of terms ending June 30, 1989. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated June 6, 1989. - 10 - Minutes 6-13-89 At this time Councilmember Sheldon submitted a letter from Richard Reznichek, MD indicating he did not wish reappointment to the commission. Action: To appoint Dani Peirce and Susan Blaco to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Advisory Com- mission for terms ending June 30, 1993. Final Action: To reappoint J.R. Reviczky to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Advisory Commission for a term ending June 30, 1993. Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon. So ordered. 15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request by Mayor Williams for discussion re. installing bathroom facilities at Sixth and Prospect, Fort Lots of Fun. (b) (c) Mayor Williams explained that this item will be ad- dressed in the Master Plan study that is being done. Request by Councilmember Rosenberger for discussion re. concern about false information being presented with signatures. ( Watchdog Initiative - present uses and dogs unleashed on right-of-way.) There was extensive Council discussion and questions of the City Attorney on this item. Councilmember Simpson requested that the record reflect that she was not har- rassed nor did the circulators make misleading state- ments when she was approached to sign the petition. Addressing the Council on this item was: Wilma Burt - 1152 -7th St.- regarding legal issues Action: The direct the City Attorney to prepare a report per the Election Code regarding the legality of the petition. Motion Creigton, second Sheldon. So ordered. Request by Mayor Williams. to consider allowing driveway permits for compact cars, said permits to be stamped "Compact Cars Only". Action: To have staff prepare a report on the pros and. cons of driveway permits for compact cars and motorcycles. Motion Williams, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (d) Request by Mayor Williams for review of Strand "flashing walk lights" policy. - 11 - Minutes 6-13-89 (e) Action: To not discuss this item. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting the objection of Williams. Request by Councilmember Creighton for consideration of placing on ballot recent initiative without signature verification expense. Councilmember Creighton stated that he understood that the signatures are being checked using the random sam- pling technique; therefore saving both time and money. CITIZEN COMMENTS Mike D'Amico - 559 Third Street - Thanked the Council for ap- pointing him to the Civil Service Commission. ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California adjourned in memory of William "Butch" Simas, a Hermosa Beach resident for 47 years who passed away May 24, 1989. The meeting adjourned on Wednesday June 14, 1989, at the hour of 12:28 A.M. to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday June 27, 1989 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. • - 12 - Depu y City Clerk Minutes 6-13-89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager FROM:. Yu-Ying Ting, Administrative Aide SUBJECT: Planning Commission Absence Record DATE: June.19, 1989 Per your request, please see attached Planning Commission absence record and Article VI. Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach City Code for your reference. Note: Commissioner Edwards has resigned due to business con- flicts with dates of Planning Commission meetings. CITY MANAGER COMMENT: The Commissioners serve four year terms and can be removed due to absences per the City Code. Staff is not recommending changes, but two options available to the Council are: 1) change the automatic vacancy due to absence provision to less than 6 absen- ces per calendar year, or 2) cause commissioners to serve at the pleasure of the Council and not for fixed terms. It is recommended that Planning Commissioner Edwards' resignation be accepted and the City Clerk authorized to advertise the vacancy. evin B. Northc".ft City Manager 12c NAME. PLANNING COMMISSION " Absence Record REASON • • • ,./' ;. c �'Y� z, 0? In 3111S1 4/31 t :5/3/ '57-'/n 7/2D/A toile( ft PAW /88 V40 s ///i.08 X7-/51 31? -1841 4-19-1a1 sl3-/� si/6 G R YL�-t/J frest P ettice_. CAAL Scott 1h C� I e,r� Ed.�,� ,[4 44, cai,.4tv z ta.r rc Q -4c 7 l� 4 c . Corzec cis ,t_, c c 1 mss,._. jekt.(FL) J •:' c(. /.` .e% • trztrh cut- 1 cut 06 t,re4, A. 1 * 2-73 HERMOSA BEACH. CITY CODE 1 2-74 • (h) Counsel with officials of public and private organiza- tions and interested groups . concerning community • 'recreation and leisure activities and assist them in the promotion of park and recreational services; and shall serve as liaison to the commission; (i) Conduct studies of local conditions and needs for park and recreation services, cultural arts programs, social service programs, and assist • with recruitment and training of said personnel; (j) Enforce all rules and regulations, resolutions and ordinances of the city pertaining to public behavior in all city -owned leisure oriented facilities and park areas. (Ord. No. 81-663, § 10, 5-26-81) ARTICLE VL PLANNING COMMISSION• Sec. 2-73. Created; composition. . A planning commission is hereby created, which shall consist of five (5) members. The members shall be qualified electors of the city appointed by the city council. (Ord. No. 140 N: S., § 1; Ord. No. 470 N. S., § 1, 7-17-73; Ord. No. 85-799, § 1, 6-13-85) . Sec. 2-74. Terms of members; vacancies. The term of office for appointive members shall be four (4) years. Such terms shall be adjusted so that not more than two (2) appointive terms shall expire on June 30th of the applicable year. If a vacancy shall occur otherwise than by expiration of term, it shall be filled by appointment by the city council for the unexpired portion of the term. No member of the commission appointed by the city council shall remain on said commission for a period of time longer than two (2) consecutive terms. Three (3) absences from regular meetings of any commission member within one (1) calendar year period creates an automatic 'Cross references—Attendance of city manager at commission meetings, § 2-17; planning commission as board of zoning adjustment, § 2-90 et seq. State law reference—City planning commissions, Gov. C. A., §§ 65330-65342. Supp. No. 6-85 46 r.T.041•. a .. -'..i ... v • . iisP-4as.40P•••;•;;40.4.44•41•44..4,:.�t..Ist�iLtF.,; C C C f 2.45 ADMINISTRATION 2.77 - ' vacancy on said commission unless excused from such attendance by consent of the commission; expressed by action made on the record and recorded•in the minutes. In no case should the total number of absences exceed six (6) inany one (1) calendar year. The secretary of the planning commission shall thereupon promptly notify the city council and any such person so ceasing to be a member of.that fact, whereupon the vacancy so created shall be filled by appointment. under applicable provisions of this article. Upon the expiration of a term, each member of the commission shall serve until the successor is appointed and qualified, except that in the event of a written resignation filed with the city managerand accepted by action of the city council said resigna- tion shall become effective on the date set forth therein. (Ord. No. 140 N. S., § 2; Ord. No. 394 N. S., § 1B, 10-20-70; Ord. No. 470 N. S., §§ 2, 3, 7-17-73; Ord. No. 77-568, § I(e), 7-26-77; Ord. No. 82-692, § 1, 6-22-82; Ord. No. 85-799, § 2, 6-13-85) Sec. 2-75. Powers and duties. The city planning commission shall be governed in all respects and perform the duties prescribed by applicable state and local laws. (Ord. No. 140 N.S., § 3) ARTICLE VII. POLICE RESERVE CORPS Sec. 2-76. Established; appointment and compensation of members. There is hereby established in the city a police reserve corps, the members of which shall be appointed by the city manager, shall perform the duties and have the functions set forth in this article and shall serve without compensation. (Ord. No. 90 N.S., § 1) Sec. 2-77. Number of members; qualifications; powers and duties generally. The police reserve corps shall be limited to thirty-five (35) members and shall be composed of individuals of either sex, who, in the judgment of the city manager, are qualified physically, psychologically and through a proper training program to assist Supp. No. 6-85 46.1 -r..,ba.w"riw=•.—.fisc:.._:,+k��:za•::+arat.•�i4.',y„�s.- ,..e:�i TO: 'FROM SUBJECT: DATE : ( C CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM • • Honorable Mayor and Members f the City Council. Michael Schubach, Pn�1�-ctor Planning Commission Absences May 23,.1989 • I. have been requested by -the City Manager to make note of Plan- ning Commissioners' absences. At this time, Commissioner Edwards has 3 excused absences and one unexcused. According to the Municipal Code, a Commissioner may have a maxi- mum of three unexcused absences or a total of six in one calendar year whether they are excused or not. Therefore, Commissioner Edwards has two more absences before an automatic vacancy occurs. Commissioner Edwards had indicatd that he would only miss three meetings this year. cc: 1. Planning Commission 2. Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager —S CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM DATE: June 27, 1989 TO: City Attorney FROM: Kevin Northcraft, City Manager RE: Clarifications of the Watchdog initiative The staff has reviewed and developed the following questions designed to clarify the initiative's impact. While many interpretations might be assumed based on the circulator's intent we have opted to include all questions developed in an attempt to avoid future disagreements in interpretation should the initiative become law. 1. Re: Section 1, reference to "passive open space uses only"; passive uses are generally defined as walking, sunbathing, picnicking, meditation, etc. Active uses are horseshoes, frisbee throwing, dog training, use of par course, and jogging, etc. Is there a conflict between Section 1 allowed uses and Section 3 listed uses, and if so, how is the conflict to be resolved? 2. Re: Section 2, language appears in error; assuming the removal of "109 development in the open space designation" means the 103 lot coverage allowed in the open space zone, does that prevent a storage building, historic structure, or any other structure, such as a retaining wall, from being built? Can L.A. County ever drill new injection well if necessary? 3. Re: Section 3, because the streets crossing the right-of-way are part of the Greenbelt land, does this imply that existing cross streets should be removed, since they might readily interfere with present pedestrian uses? Does it prohibit ever changing/adding cross streets? 4. Does the planned improvement of 'dust bowl' area, where 'grass pavers' are contemplated, represent prohibited "paving"? Can driveways be paved when parking areas are not? 5. Does the initiative permit designation of an off -leash area of smaller size than entire right-of-way? 6. Does the initiative require that an off -leash area be maintained, or only that no structures/etc. be built to interfere, if one is allowed? Current city ordinance V1/4\',requires dogs to be on leash on right-of-way; does ``��..,,�� initiative rescind or render this ordinance �.r�'�� S `' unenforcable? 4 \.O%** ```Q ``�` 1 - \I". 1 7. The noted 61 spaces of existing parking; does this reference prohibit new restriping plans that would affect number of spaces? 8. Re: Section 2, if 10% development restriction is not "applicable", what development restriction is? 9. Re: Section 3, "present uses" listed, are these examples or all that are to be allowed? The list does not include such present uses as bicycle riding, use of par course, picnicking, and fire access road required by the Fire Code. 10. Re: Section 3, how should "competent control of owner/designee" be defined? Can Council define in a subsequent ordinance ,/ 2 James K. Sullivan 1051 8th Street, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 372-1483 June 21, 1989 Chuck Sheldon Council Member City of Hermosa Beach Dear Mr. Sheldon: I am writing in reference to Ordinances 88-949 and 88-956 which consider the effect of the R-2 height limits on the views of adjacent R-1 properties. This ordinance is specifically limited to a small area of North Hermosa Beach with views to the west. My request is that the ordinance be expanded to include the R-1 area on the north side of 8th Street between Prospect Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. I live in this area at 1051 8th Street. My wife and I enjoy wonderful views to the south and southwest which include the Palos Verdes Peniusula and on those special, clear days, Catalina Island. I enclose photographs which show the view and the effect on the view of new construction just down the street from our home. If the other R -2B lots across from us were permitted to build to the same heights, our view would be eliminated. We have a small home (less than 1,000 sq. ft.). The views give us tremendous enjoyment and a feeling of openness. We want to preserve them. Thank you for your attention. James K. Sullivan 1051 8th Street, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 372-1483 June 21, 1989 Jim Rosenberger Council Member City of Hermosa Beach Dear Mr. Rosenberger I am writing in reference to Ordinances 88-949 and 88-956 which consider the effect of the R-2 height limits on the views of adjacent R-1 properties. This ordinance is specifically limited to a small area of North Hermosa Beach with views to the west. My request is that the ordinance be expanded to include the R-1 area on the north side of 8th Street between Prospect Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. I live in this area at 1051 8th Street. My wife and I enjoy wonderful views to the south and southwest which include the Palos Verdes Peniusula and on those special, clear days, Catalina Island. I enclose photographs which show the view and the effect on the view of new construction just down the street from our home. If the other R -2B lots across from us were permitted to build to the same heights, our view would be eliminated. We have a small home (less than 1,000 sq. ft.). The views give us tremendous enjoyment and a feeling of openness. We want to preserve them. Thank you for your attention. Sin rely, s K. Sullivan FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17.29:34 PAY * * * * * * * * * VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H FIRE SERV MANAGERS WORKSHOP SEM REG/M. STURGES H FIRE SERV MANAGERS WORKSHOP REG/FIRE EMPLOYEES VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02900 001-400-1206-4316 00075 $20.00 06/19/89 DATA PROCESSING /TRAINING 02900 001-400-2201-4316 00191 $60.00 06/19/89 FIRE /TRAINING H HART DEVELOPMENT WORK GUAR REFUND H H H H H H H H H ****************************** PAGE 0001 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *80.00 02901 001-210-0000-2110 02945 $587.05 06/21/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE VENDOR TOTAL *************************** ►** ►**** ►***** ************************** HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT SAL/5-16 TO 5-31-89 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL SAL/6-1 TO 6-15-89 HERMOSA SAL/5-16 HERMOSA SAL/5-16 HERMOSA SAL/5-16 HERMOSA SAL/5-16 HERMOSA SAL/5-16 HERMOSA SAL/5-16 HERMOSA SAL/5-16 VENDOR TOTAL BEACH PAYROLL TO 5-31-89 BEACH PAYROLL TO 5-31-89 BEACH PAYROLL TO 5-31-89 BEACH PAYROLL TO 5-31-89 BEACH PAYROLL TO 5-31-89 ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT TO 5-31-89 BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT TO 5-31-89 00243 001-202-0000-2030 06/01/89 00243 06/19/89 00243 06/01/89 00243 06/01/89 00243 06/01/89 00243 06/01/89 00243 06/01/89 00243 06/01/89 00243 06/01/89 001-202-0000-2030 105-202-0000-2030 110-202-0000-2030 145-202-0000-2030 155-202-0000-2030 160-202-0000-2030 170-202-0000-2030 705-202-0000-2030 00283 00284 00157 00158 00153 00154 00152 00008 00115 *6.632.71 /ACCRUED PAYROLL *587.05 $173.564.95 /ACCRUED PAYROLL *251.280.01 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $7,031.50 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $47.133.00 /ACCRUED PAYROLL *1,707.31 /ACCRUED PAYROLL *3.902.48 /ACCRUED PAYROLL *6.797.70 /ACCRUED PAYROLL *12.946.96 /ACCRUED PAYROLL *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** R DONNA* LAVALLE ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 02883 001-210-0000-2110 79727 06/15/89 *510,996.62 $511.663.67 08321 30268 $0.00 06/22/89 08321 30268 $0.00 06/22/89 08836 30270 $0.00 06/22/89 *0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 02953 $50.00 79727 08450 30130 06/22/89 30269 06/22/89 30130 06/22/89 30130 06/22/89 30130 06/22/89 30130 06/22/89 30130 06/22/89 30130 06/22/89 30130 06/22/89 30275 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 06/22/89 1b • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R A-1 COAST RENTALS MISC CHCS/MAY 89 PAGE 0002 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *50. 00 00029 001-400-8614-4201 00026 *234.28 574701 00051 30276 74701 05/31/89 CIP 88-614 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS PORTABLE RADIOS/CHARGER 28844 00935 001-400-2201-5402 06/17/89 FIRE *234. 28 00009 *3.310.02 /EQUIP -MORE THAN *500 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** MICHAEL*AGUILO CITE PAYMENT REFUND *** VENDOR TOTAL 02882 110-300-0000-3302 27928 39273 06/01/89 R CHUCK*ALVAREZ TREAT TECH/JUN 4.89 *3.310.02 *46. 00 /COURT FINES/PARKING **************************** $46.00 01779 001-400-4601-4201 00345 466.00 06/05/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R R *** R R R ANTHONY *ANTICH MON EXP/MAY 89 ANTHONY *ANTICH MON EXP/MAY 89 VENDOR TOTAL 00030 001-400-4202-4305 00386 05/31/89 *66.00 *5. 33 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00030 001-400-4202-4316 00130 05/31/89 *72. 57 PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING ******************************************************************** ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/MAV 89 ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/MAY 89 ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/MAY 89 00152 001-400-2201-4309 00698 05/31/89 FIRE 00152 001-400-3104-4309 00254 05/31/89 $77.90 419.80 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $5.00 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00152 001-400-4204-4309 01341 05/31/89 *78. 60 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 28844 07947 30277 *3.310.02 06/22/89 739275 08736 30278 *0.00 06/22/89 07791 30279 *0.00 06/22/89 08842 30280 *0.00 06/22/89 08842 30280 *0.00 06/22/89 00017 30281 *0.00 06/22/89 00017 30281 *0.00 06/22/89 00017 30281 40.00 06/22/89 • • • • • • • • • • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ** R R • R R R R R R R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/MAY 89 ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/MAY 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00152 05/31/89 00152 05/31/89 001-400-4205-4309 00373 EQUIP SERVICE 110-400-3302-4309 00550 PARKING ENF PAGE 0003 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO M CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $15.00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *4. 48 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS VENDOR TOTAL ************************************************ ************* ***** AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHCS/MAY 89 AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHCS/MAY 89 AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHCS/MAY 89 AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHCS/MAY 89 AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHCS/MAY 89 AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHCS/MAY 89 AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHCS/MAY 89 00407 001-400-2101-4305 01026 05/31/89 POLICE 00407 001-400-2101-4311 00684 05/31/89 POLICE 00407 001-400-4204-4309 01342 05/31/89 BLDG MAINT 00407 001-400-6101-4309 00703 05/31/89 PARKS 00407 001-400-8604-4201 00112 05/31/89 CIP 86-604 00407 001-400-8604-4309 00142 05/31/89 CIP 86-604 00407 110-400-3302-4309 00551 05/31/89 PARKING ENF $122.88 *29. 39 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *25. 56 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *36. 19 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *11. 19 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *80. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *71.36 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *28. 30 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL ***************************** *********** ►******************** ***** R B & L CRANE SERVICE CRANE SERV/PIER AVE LITE *281. 99 02442 105-400-8202-4201 00034 *275.00 06/01/89 CIP 85-202 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JULIE*BALL LIGHT TECH/MAY 24.26.27 • •** VENDOR TOTAL • • 0 • 01527 06/01/89 *275. 00 001-400-4601-4201 00347 *130.00 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R BANK OF AMERICA MON EXP/R. BLACKWOOD ************************ *130. 00 00180 001-400-1203-4251 00121 *223.64 06/03/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 00017 30281 • *0.00 06/22/89 00017 30281 • *0.00 06/22/89 00055 30282 *0.00 06/22/89 • • 00055 30282 • *0.00 06/22/89 00055 30282 *0.00 06/22/89 • 00055 30282 • *0.00 06/22/89 00055 30282 • *0.00 06/22/89 00055 30282 • *0.00 06/22/89 00055 30282 • *0.00 06/22/89 • 08813 30283 • *660.00 06/22/89 07788 30284 *0.00 06/22/89 08270 30285 *0.00 06/22/89 • • • • • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R BANK OF AMERICA MAY EXPENSES/WISNIEWSKI CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00180 001-400-2101-4316 695 06/01/89 POLICE 00392 *377.48 /TRAININQ *** VENDOR TOTAL****************a*************************www.**********.******.*** R R R R R R R R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHCS/MAY 89 BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHOS/MAV 89 BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHCS/MAY 89 BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHAS/MAV 89 BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHOS/MAY 89 BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHAS/MAY 89 BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHCS/MAV 89 BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHCS/MAV 89 *** VENDOR TOTAL 02509 001-400-1121-4305 00106 05/31/89 CITY CLERK 02509 001-400-1206-4305 00383 05/31/89 DATA PROCESSING 02509 001-400-1207-4305 00162 05/31/89 BUS LICENSE 02509 001-400-2101-4305 01027 05/31/89 POLICE 02509 001-400-4201-4305 00454 05/31/89 BUILDINQ 02509 001-400-4202-4305 00387 05/31/89 PUB WKS ADMIN 02509 001-400-4601-4305 00690 05/31/89 COMM RESOURCES 02509 110-400-3302-4305 00580 05/31/89 PARKING ENF PAGE 0004 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *601.12 *43. 66 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *16. 17 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *15. 50 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *25. 83 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *77. 64 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *21. 87 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *17. 64 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $59.60 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R CAROL*BELSER VOLLEYBALL HATS *277. 91 02896 001-400-4601-4306 00183 *56.00 06/01/89 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIA'.;, *** VENDOR TOTAL******.+**********************************************************r:, *56.00 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 01308 001-400-1212-4188 01416 06/15/89 EMP BENEFITS 01308 105-400-2601-4188 00757 06/15/89 STREET LIGHTING *72. 15 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *0. 51 /EMPLOYEE BENEtITS 695 08930 30285 *0.00 06/22/89 00549 30286 *0.00 06/22/89 00549 30286 •0.00 06/22/89 00549 30286 *0.00 06/22/89 00549 30286 *0.00 06/22/89 00549 30286 *0.00 06/22/89 00549 30286 *0.00 06/22/89 00549 30286 *0.00 06/22/89 00549 30286 *0.00 06/22/89 07786 30287 *0.00 06/22/89 00055 30288 *0.00 06/22/89 00055 30288 *0.00 06/22/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/JULY P7 R BLUE SHT'LU OF CALIFORNIA CIT':' HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/JULY Q^ R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITU HEALTH INS/JULY 89 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 CITU or iIERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 PAGE 0005 DATE 06/22/89 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M .:MOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK M DATE 1NVC PROJ M ACCOUNT P'75CRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 01308 110-1G0-3301-4188 00729 06/15/P7 VEH PKG DIST 01308 110-400-3302-4188 00959 06/15/89 PARKING ENF 01308 145-400-3401-4188 011;',/ 06/15/89 DIAL HIDE 01308 1a` .U0-3402-4188 00698 06/15/^.1 ESEA 01308 145-400-3403-4188 00144 06/15/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY 01308 155-400-2102-4188 00367 Oo. ►/89 CROSSING GUARD 01308 160-400-2102-4188 00701 06/15/89 SEWtn.'CT DRAIN *** VENDOR TOTAL *********w**************************....****Mss►*.*.u*****.*u. R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R BLUE SH1t:..L PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/JUL e9 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R BLVF SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEAL M TNS/JUL 89 * * * R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 A BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 VENDOR TOTAL R BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC CHCS/MAY 89 01293 001-400-1212-4188 01412 06/15/89 EMP BENEFITS 01293 110-400-3302-4188 00'1 06/15/89 PARKING ENF .7193 145-400-3401-4188 00693 06/15/6Y DIAL A RIDE 01293 145-400-3402-4103 00693 06/15/89 ESEA 01293 705-400-1209-4188 00111 06/15/89 LIABILITY INS 01293 705-400-1.17-4188 00110 06/15/89 WORKERS COMP $2.05 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2.05 /EMPLOYF.7 BENEFITS $0.26 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.51 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.01 /EMPLOYF": BENEFITS $0.51 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *0. 65 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $79.70 $10.932.76 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $689.38 /EMI✓LC`.'rE BENEFITS *17.08 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $6.83 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $85.4A /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $170.82 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *11.902.28 00005 001-400-1208-4305 00641 $1.385.88 05/31/89 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES • 00^.:J 30288 $0.00 06/22/89 00055 30288 $0.00 06/22/89 00055 30288 $0.00 06/22'Sr nfss * 30288 $0.00 06/22/89 00055 30288 $0.00 06/22/89 00055 30288 $0.00 06/22/89 00055 30288 $0.00 06/2.11:20 00056 30289 $0. vv 06/22/89 00056 30289 $0.00 06/22/89 00056 30289 $0.00 06/22/89 00056 302B7 *0.00 06/22/89 00056 30289 $0.00 06/22/89 00056 30289 $0.00 06/22/C9 00057 30290 $0.00 06/22/89 • .00 • n FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ••* VENDOR TOTAL *******+*ir*****ri►*************************************************** R BRAUN LINEN SERVICE MISC CHCS/MAY 89 00163 001-400-2101-4306 00665 74701 05/31/89 POLICE PAGE 0006 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO M CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *1,385.88 *200. 31 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************•************************************** R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES TRASH PICKUP/JUNE 89 R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES TRASH PICKUP/JUNE 89 00155 06/01/89 00155 06/01/89 001-400-1208-4201 00554 GEN APPROP 110-400-3301-4201 00214 VEH PKG DIST *200. 31 *574. 25 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *465. 98 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL**********•*********•****************•****************************** * * * R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES DUMP CHAS/MAY 89 37002 VENDOR TOTAL 00158 001-400-3103-4201 00224 05/31/89 ST MAINTENANCE *1. 040. 23 574701 00058 30291 *0.00 06/22/89 $3,311.51 90500-0037002 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R JAMES*BURGUE THEAT TECH/JUNE 3-4,89 02544 001-400-4601-4201 00346 06/08/89 COMM RESOURCES *3.311.51 *110.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************•********************** R R *** R R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY COMP PRINTOUT SHELVES 52455 BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY DESK TOP ORGANIZER 52277 00034 001-400-1202-5401 00003 06/14/89 FINANCE ADMIN 00034 110-400-3301-4305 00071 05/31/89 VEH PKG DIST *110. 00 00005 30292 *0.00 06/22/89 00005 30292 *0.00 06/22/89 00004 30293 *0.00 06/22/89 07794 30294 *0.00 06/22/89 *481.38 152455 07392 /EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *50 *0.00 *197.98 152277 08714 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *185.90 VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************•********************* C. E. P. 0 REG/K. MIDSTOKKE TR239 C. E. P. 0 REG/K. MIDSTOKKE TR239 *679. 36 02318 001-400-1121-4317 00042 *37.50 06/21/89 CITY CLERK /CONFERENCE EXPENSE 02318 001-400-1122-4317 00022 *37.50 06/21/89 ELECTIONS /CONFERENCE EXPENSE 30295 06/22/89 30295 06/22/89 TR239 00239 30296 *0.00 06/22/89 TR239 00239 30296 *0.00 06/22/89 9 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:34 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * R CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES. INC. NOTARY BOND/L. RIDDLE 19320 00038 05/22/89 • PAGE 0007 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $75.00 705-400-1210-4201 00034 $100.00 1019320 08268 30297 AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/22/89 VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************u***************** R CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE 01065 001-400-2101-4316 PEACE OFCRS LEGAL SOURCE 69471 03/25/89 POLICE $100. 00 00393 $70.00 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CALIF. POLICE CHIEFS ASSOC. DUES/COMM. A. ALTFELD *** VENDOR TOTAL *70.00 01263 001-400-2101-4315 00134 $65.00 06/15/89 POLICE /MEMBERSHIP R CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE CITY ATTY NAMEPLATE 24757 $65.00 00262 001-400-1131-4305 00109 $13.56 06/13/89 CITY ATTORNEY /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $13.56 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 00239 001-400-1212-4188 01417 06/15/89 EMP BENEFITS 00239 105-400-2601-4188 00758 06/15/89 STREET LIGHTING 00239 110-400-3301-4188 00730 06/15/89 VEH PKG DIST 00239 110-400-3302-4188 00960 06/15/89 PARKING ENF 00239 145-400-3401-4188 00698 06/15/89 DIAL A RIDE 00239 145-400-3402-4188 00699 06/15/89 ESEA 02.685.92 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $76.74 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $17.37 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $573.94 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $5.16 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.76 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 69471 09553 30298 $70.00 06/22/89 0 • • 0 • • • • 08939 30299 • $0.00 06/22/89 • 24757 04599 30300 • $0.00 06/22/89 00024 30301 $0.00 06/22/89 00024 30301 $0.00 06/22/89 00024 30301 $0.00 06/22/89 • • 00024 30301 • $0.00 06/22/89 00024 30301 • $0.00 06/22/89 00024 30301 $0.00 06/22/89 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH 1NS/JULY 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 *** VENDOR TOTAL R PHYLLIS*CARSON WORK GUAR REFUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00239 145-400-3403-4188 00145 06/15/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY 00239 155-400-2102-4188 00368 06/15/89 CROSSING GUARD 00239 160-400-3102-4188 00702 06/15/89 SEWER/BT DRAIN 00239 705-400-1209-4188 00113 06/15/89 LIABILITY INS 00239 705-400-1217-4188 00112 06/15/89 WORKERS COMP 02888 001-210-0000-2110 74779 06/15/89 $1.95 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *14.45 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $94.78 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS • PAGE 0008 DATE 06/22/89 40 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $17.77 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $6.31 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *3,496.15 00024 30301 $0.00 06/22/89 00024 30301 $0.00 06/22/89 00024 30301 $0.00 06/22/89 00024 30301 $0.00 06/22/89 00024 30301 $0.00 06/22/89 02961 $1.575.00 74779 08440 30302 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * R CDS NATIONAL USERS GROUP DUES/GAIL KOEBSELL 02877 001-400-2101-4315 06/15/89 POLICE $1, 575.00 00133 $50.00 /MEMBERSHIP VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CELLULAR DYNAMICS COMPANY MOBILE PHONE USE/MAY 89 *** VENDOR TOTAL 02449 001-400-2101-4304 05/31/89 POLICE *50.00 00385 $1.309.21 /TELEPHONE ****************************** R CENVAL LEASING 58 JUNE LEASE PMT *** VENDOR TOTAL 00875 001-400-2101-6900 06/08/89 POLICE $1.309.21 00430 $624.27 /LEASE PAYMENTS R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENT/MAY 89 $624.27 00153 001-400-4202-4187 00115 $436.88 05/31/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 08940 30303 $0.00 06/22/89 00510 30304 $0.00 06/22/89 08933 30305 $0.00 06/22/89 00002 30306 $0.00 06/22/89 • • 1 1 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENT/MAY 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00153 110-400-3302-4187 00186 $42.00 05/31/89 PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL **************************************** *********** **** **** ***** R DENNIS*CLELAND WORK GUAR REFUND 02213 001-210-0000-2110 59048 06/15/89 PAGE 0009 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO M CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $478.88 00002 30306 $0.00 06/22/89 02949 $1.550.00 59048 08446 30307 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL w***w***************************w****www***ww*w***w*w***********ww*w R COALE CONSTRUCTION WORK GUAR REFUND 01479 001-210-0000-2110 74796 06/15/89 *1.550.00 02962 $150.00 74796 08441 30308 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***w***w******* ********ww+►w ** ►a►*************************www******* R COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DIST CHCS/MAY 89 R COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DIST CHCS/MAY 89 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST CHCS/MAY 89 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST CHGS/MAY 89 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST CHCS/MAY 89 R COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DIST CHOS/MAY 89 R COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DIST CHCS/MAY 89 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST CHCS/MAY 89 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST CHOS/MAY 89 00017 001-400-1101-4304 00223 05/31/89 CITY COUNCIL 00017 001-400-1121-4304 00212 05/31/89 CITY CLERK 00017 001-400-1141-4304 00222 05/31/89 CITY TREASURER 00017 001-400-1201-4304 00237 05/31/89 CITY MANAGER 00017 001-400-1202-4304 00242 05/31/89 FINANCE ADMIN 00017 001-400-1203-4304 00240 03/31/89 PERSONNEL 00017 001-400-2101-4304 00387 05/31/89 POLICE 00017 001-400-2401-4304 00227 05/31/89 ANIMAL CONTROL 00017 001-400-4101-4304 00243 05/31/89 PLANNING $150.00 *2.49 /TELEPHONE $2.06 /TELEPHONE $10.69 /TELEPHONE *3.15 /TELEPHONE *29.25 /TELEPHONE *13.14 /TELEPHONE $324.48 /TELEPHONE *7.17 /TELEPHONE *56.64 /TELEPHONE 00515 30310 $0.00 06/22/89 00515 30310 $0.00 06/22/89 00515 30310 $0.00 06/22/89 00515 30310 $0.00 06/22/89 00515 30310 $0.00 06/22/89 00515 30310 $0.00 06/22/89 00515 30310 $0.00 06/22/89 00515 30310 $0.00 06/22/89 00515 30310 $0.00 06/22/89 410. FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST CHCS/MAY 89 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST CHCS/MAY 89 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST CHCS/MAY 89 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST CHCS/MAY 89 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST CHGS/MAY 89 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST CHGS/MAY 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00017 001-400-4201-4304 00238 05/31/89 BUILDING 00017 001-400-4202-4304 00243 05/31/89 PUB WKS ADMIN 00017 001-400-4601-4304 00278 05/31/89 COMM RESOURCES 00017 001-400-6101-4304 00150 05/31/89 PARKS 00017 05/31/89 105-400-2601-4304 00112 STREET LIGHTING 00017 110-400-3302-4304 00242 05/31/89 PARKING ENF $18.64 /TELEPHONE $72.82 /TELEPHONE *56.88 /TELEPHONE $18.00 /TELEPHONE $11.17 /TELEPHONE $35.24 /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************************************MSM R THE *COPY SHOP PRINT SERV/COMM RES PAGE 0010 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $661.82 00022 001-400-4601-4305 00687 $90.53 06/15/89 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ROBERT*CORRY WORK GUAR REFUND 02889 001-210-0000-2110 74796 06/15/89 $90.53 00515 30310 $0.00 06/22/89 00515 30310 $0.00 06/22/89 00515 30310 $0.00 06/22/89 00515 30310 $0.00 06/22/89 00515 30310 $0.00 06/22/89 00515 30310 $0.00 06/22/89 07775 30311 $0.00 06/22/89 02963 $750.00 74796 08442 30312 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R WILLOW*CULDERTSON CITE PAYMENT REFUND 02893 110-300-0000-3302 08195 06/13/89 $750.00 27923 $18.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DAILY JOURNAL EMPLOYEE ADS 02845 001-400-1203-4201 00518 23862 05/31/89 PERSONNEL $18.00 808195 07398 30313 $0.00 06/22/89 $277.20 LAJ1023862 08250 30314 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $277.20 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE & SHELTER COSTS/MAY 89 $277.20 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00105 $467.82 06/10/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 00014 30315 $0.00 06/22/89 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME_ 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL R DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES USE TAX DUE/NISSANS R DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES USE TAX DUE/NISSANS R DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES USE TAX DUE/NISSANS R DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES USE TAX DUE/NISSANS *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02895 001-400-1201-6900 00095 06/15/89 CITY MANAGER 02895 001-400-2101-6900 00429 06/15/89 POLICE 02895 001-400-2201-6900 00075 06/15/89 FIRE 02895 110-400-3302-6900 00123 06/15/89 PARKING ENF PAGE 0011 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $467.82 *454.00 /LEASE PAYMENTS *1.206.00 /LEASE PAYMENTS *411.00 /LEASE PAYMENTS *402.00 /LEASE PAYMENTS R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HWY MAINT/APR 89 09399 R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HWY MAINT/APR 89 09399 *** VENDOR TOTAL *2.473.00 00267 001-400-3104-4251 00020 $336.44 05/23/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 00267 105-400-2601-4251 00086 $336.44 05/23/89 STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT R OFCR MICHELE*DERKS MILES/CHILD ABUSE CLASS 02134 001-400-2101-4312 00954 06/05/89 POLICE $672.88 $36.40 /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R R R DEVOKE DATA PRODUCTS DRAFTING TABLE 46301 DEVOKE DATA PRODUCTS DESK TOP ORGANIZER/PARKI 69351 DEVOKE DATA PRODUCTS PRINTER STAND/PKQ 65100 00716 001-400-4202-5401 00016 06/07/89 PUB WKS ADMIN 00716 110-400-3302-4305 00577 06/14/89 PARKING ENF 00716 110-400-3302-4305 00578 05/30/89 PARKING ENF $36.40 09202 30316 $0.00 06/22/89 09202 30316 $0.00 06/22/89 09202 30316 *0.00 06/22/89 09202 30316 $0.00 06/22/89 109399 08837 30317 $0.00 06/22/89 109399 08837 30317 $0.00 06/22/89 $370.99 10946301 /EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $50 $272.55 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $37,21 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION COMP MAINT/PD/MAR-MAY 89 38889 00269 001-400-2101-4201 02/17/89 POLICE $680. 75 08927 30318 $0.00 06/22/89 08805 30319 $369.32 06/22/89 10969351 08733 30319 $252.59 06/22/89 10965100 08715 30319 $0.00 06/22/89 00395 $396.00 374238889 00006 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 30320 06/22/89 1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION **r VENDOR TOTAL********r******r**************************************************** r*r * * * R M. O. *DION & SONS, INC. KEROSENE/CITY YARD 79103 I PAGE 0012 DATE 06/22/89 0 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP •396. 00 00085 001-400-4205-4310 00139 $93.20 05/16/89 EQUIP SERVICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES VENDOR TOTAL***rr*********r************************************************r**** R DIVERSIFIED SERVICES. INC. PROG PMT 1 PIER REPAIR 1005 02879 001-400-8614-4201 00027 05/29/89 CIP 88-614 *93.20 79103 08808 30321 $84.34 06/22/89 $3.381.07 1005 08852 30322 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/22/89 VENDOR TOTALrrr****rrr********************r************************************* R DYNAMED MISC CHCS/MAV 89 01498 001-400-2201-4309 00699 05/31/89 FIRE $3. 381. 07 $100.70 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS **r VENDOR TOTAL *********************rrr*****************************rrr************ R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY METER VSE/MAINT/APR/MAY 41753 **r VENDOR TOTAL 02840 001-400-1208-4201 00552 06/04/89 GEN APPROP $100. 70 00521 30323 $0.00 06/22/89 $521.52 006-1141753 07400 30324 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/22/89 R EASY READER PUBLIC NOTICING/MAY 89 rrr VENDOR TOTAL $521.52 00181 001-400-1121-4323 00065 $1.109.68 0268 05/31/89 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 89 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 89 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 89 R EDDINQS BROTHERS MISC CHAS/MAY 89 AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING ******************** 00165 001-400-2101-4311 00685 05/31/89 POLICE 00165 001-400-3103-4311 00465 05/31/89 ST MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-3104-4311 00025 05/31/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00165 001-400-4204-4311 00127 05/31/89 BLDG MAINT $1,109.68 $284.68 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $259.49 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $114.50 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $46.84 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 0268 04598 30325 $0.00 06/22/89 00522 30326 $0.00 06/22/89 00522 30326 $0.00 06/22/89 00522 30326 $0.00 06/22/89 00522 30326 *0.00 06/22/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 89 EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 89 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHAS/MAY 89 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 89 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 89 *** VENDOR TOTAL AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00165 001-400-4205-4309 00374 05/31/89 EQUIP SERVICE 00165 001-400-4203-4311 00137 05/31/89 EQUIP SERVICE 00165 105-400-2601-4311 00141 05/31/89 STREET LIGHTING 00165 110-400-3302-4311 00490 05/31/89 PARKING ENF 00165 160-400-3102-4311 00120 05/31/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN R EL CAMINO COLLEGE REO/3 POLICE OFFICERS R EL CAMINO COLLEGE REQ/SRCH WARRANT CLASS 01469 06/05/89 01469 06/15/89 • PAGE 0013 DATE 06/22/89 • INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $462.51 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *426.04 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $11.72 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $434.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $2.09 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $2.041.87 001-400-2101-4316 00387 $7.50 POLICE /TRAINING 001-400-2101-4316 00391 $2.50 POLICE /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CITY OF*EL SEGUNDO CAR RENTAL/NARCOTICS OFC R CITY OF*EL SEGUNDO CAR RENTAL/NARC OFCRS 02783 170-400-2103-4201 00012 06/19/89 SPEC INVESTCTNS 02783 170-400-2103-4201 00014 06/07/89 SPEC INVESTOTNS *10. 00 $274.77 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *1.099.08 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICES INC. JANITOR SERV/MAY 89 *** VENDOR TOTAL R JOHN*FEATHERSTONE VOLLEYBALL DIR/MAY27-28 $1.373.85 01294 001-400-4204-4201 00323 $1.325.00 05/31/89 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ********************************************** $1.325.00 00994 001-400-4601-4201 00349 $400.00 06/02/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT • 00522 30326 • $0.00 06/22/89 00522 30326 • $0.00 06/22/89 00522 30326 • $0.00 06/22/89 00522 30326 • $0.00 06/22/89 00522 30326 • $0.00 06/22/89 • 08919 30327 • $0.00 06/22/89 08956 30327 • $0.00 06/22/89 • 08942 30328 $0.00 06/22/89 08922 30328 • $0.00 06/22/89 00062 30329 • $0.00 06/22/89 • 07790 30330 • $0.00 06/22/89 • • 4 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ********w* ►**** ►****** * ******** *** ► ►******* ►********************* R FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. MAILING SERV/POLICE 01962 001-400-2101-4305 87999 05/30/89 POLICE PAGE 0014 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO N CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 1400. 00 01023 $20.00 6-791-87999 08921 30331 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 10.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R FRANKSONS, INC. CUSHMAN PARTS *20.00 00010 110-400-3302-4311 00489 $128.82 15302 06/07/89 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** JANET*FURNEE' LIGHT TECH/JUN 6/11-89 *** VENDOR TOTAL 02610 06/13/89 001-400-4601-4201 00348 $128.82 $65.00 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R OATES MC DONALD REIMS WORK COMP/MAY 89 *** VENDOR TOTAL 02596 705-400-1217-4182 00103 05/31/89 WORKERS COMP R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY MISC CMOS/MAY 89 R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY MISC CHOS/MAY 89 *65.00 $3,459.50 /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR ****************************** 13, 459. 50 00038 001-400-4204-4309 01344 $189.91 05/31/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00058 105-400-8203-4309 00032 $107.16 05/31/89 CIP 85-203 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00222 06/01/89 CITY COUNCIL 00015 001-400-1122-4304 00038 06/01/89 ELECTIONS 00015 06/01/89 001-400-1131-4304 00143 CITY ATTORNEY $297.07 15302 08729 30332 $124.34 06/22/89 07798 30333 $0.00 06/22/89 08272 30334 $0.00 06/22/89 00524 30335 $0.00 06/22/89 00524 30335 $0.00 06/22/89 $5.32 318-0225 00662 30337 /TELEPHONE $0.00 06/22/89 *13.29 318-0225 00662 30337 /TELEPHONE $0.00 06/22/89 $6.64 318-0225 00662 30337 /TELEPHONE $0.00 06/22/89 Alb 1 f i FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN-DIAL COST/JUN 89 -0225 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00221 *10.63 06/01/89 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE PAGE 0015 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00236 411.96 06/01/89 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00241 *44.52 06/01/89 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00239 *17.28 06/01/89 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00165 420.60 06/01/89 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00132 *13.95 06/01/89 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00386 *273.70 06/01/89 POLICE /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00175 *6.64 06/01/89 FIRE /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00226 *10.63 06/01/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00242 *27.24 06/01/89 PLANNING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00237 $55.15 06/01/89 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00242 $61.80 06/01/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4601-4305 00686 *13.29 06/01/89 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00149 *6.64 06/01/89 PARKS /TELEPHONE 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00241 *71.76 06/01/89 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE 318-0225 00662 30337 40.00 06/22/89 318-0225 00662 30337 40.00 06/22/89 318-0225 00662 30337 • *0.00 06/22/89 318-0225 00662 30337 / $0.00 06/22/89 318-0225 00662 30337 1 $0.00 06/22/89 • 318-0225 00662 30337 • $0.00 06/22/89 318-0225 00662 30337 0 *0.00 06/22/89 318-0225 00662 30337 0 *0.00 06/22/89 318-0225 00662 30337 • $0.00 06/22/89 318-0225 00662 30337 *0.00 06/22/89 318-0225 00662 30337 *0.00 06/22/89 318-0225 00662 30337 *0.00 06/22/89 318-0225 00662 30337 *0.00 06/22/89 318-0225 00662 30337 *0.00 06/22/89 318-0225 00662 30337 $0.00 06/22/89 0 0 r FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL *************r***** ► ►** *** ******** ►** ►aro ** ►*******************x* R GERBER AMBULANCE SERVICE PRIS TRANS/ROACH 00645 *** VENDOR TOTAL 02897 001-400-2101-4201 05/28/89 POLICE R CAROLE*GOODRICH WORK GUAR REFUND PAGE 0016 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO M CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP •671.04 00396 $481.67 100645 08918 30338 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/22/89 ***************************** 02696 001-210-0000-2110 02946 3609 06/15/89 $481.67 $175.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R OTEL EQUIP RENTAL/MAY-JUN 89 R GTEL EQUIP RENTAL/MAY-JUN 89 01340 001-400-2201-4304 00174 06/01/89 FIRE 01340 001-400-4601-4304 00277 06/01/89 COMM RESOURCES $175. 00 $216.40 /TELEPHONE $99.72 /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 02623 001-400-1212-4188 01410 06/15/89 EMP BENEFITS 02623 105-400-2601-4188 00752 06/15/89 STREET LIGHTING 02623 110-400-3302-4188 00953 06/15/89 PARKING ENF 02623 145-400-3401-4188 00691 06/15/89 DIAL A RIDE 02623 145-400-3402-4188 00691 06/15/89 ESEA 02623 145-400-3403-4188 00141 06/15/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY 02623 160-400-3102-4188 00696 06/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN $316.12 *1,531.56 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $3.44 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $99.01 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $10.30 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $5.23 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2.66 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $5.16 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3609 08443 30339 $0.00 06/22/89 00626 30340 $0.00 06/22/89 00626 30340 $0.00 06/22/89 00001 30341 $0.00 06/22/89 00001 30341 $0.00 06/22/89 00001 30341 $0.00 06/22/89 00001 30341 $0.00 06/22/89 00001 30341 $0.00 06/22/89 00001 30341 $0.00 06/22/89 00001 30341 $0.00 06/22/89 • • • • • / • I 9 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:34 PAY xx R R r R R R x** VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02623 705-400-1209-4188 00109 06/15/89 LIABILITY INS 02623 705-400-1217-4188 00108 06/15/89 WORKERS COMP $11.10 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $22.20 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS GUILD PRINTING COMPANY, INC. BUS CARDS/POLICE 27-01 QUILD PRINTING COMPANY, INC. PRINT SERV/BUILDING 27-01 QUILD PRINTING COMPANY. INC. PRINT SERV/COMM RES 27-01 00202 001-400-2101-4305 01024 04/28/89 POLICE 00202 001-400-4201-4305 00453 04/28/89 BUILDING 00202 001-400-4601-4305 00688 04/28/89 COMM RESOURCES PAGE 0017 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO M CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1.690.66 $149.51 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $48.99 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $48.99 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTALxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*****xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*****xxxx R HALPRIN SUPPLY COMPANY WATER PICKUP UNIT 72430 00946 160-400-3102-5402 00004 06/05/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN $247.49 00001 30341 $0.00 06/22/89 00001 30341 $0.00 06/22/89 122927-01 07755 30 $0.00 06/22/89 122927-01 07755 30342 $50.00 06/22/89 122927-01 07755 30342 $50.00 06/22/89 $995.88 H71623/72430 07693 30343 /EQUIP -MORE THAN *500 $0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTALxxxxxxxx*xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*xxxxxxxxxxxx******************************x R BARRY*HANNA PROF SERV/COMM RES 02891 001-400-4601-4201 00344 06/12/89 COMM RESOURCES *995.88 $100.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LEZLI D.*HARDWICK CITE COURT BAIL REFUND 07605 02880 110-300-0000-3302 06/16/89 *100. 00 07797 30344 $0.00 06/22/89 27925 *18.00 807603 08746 30345 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 06/22/89 x** VENDOR TOTALxx*****x**x***************x**********x************x***********x***** $18.00 R HARRIS & ASSOCIATES PROF SERV/FEB 89 R HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 02102 001-210-0000-2110 20102 05/02/89 02102 001-210-0000-2110 21ST VACATION SERV 90107 05/18/89 02951 $2,722.95 890020102 08827 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02952 $483.56 880590107 08849 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 30346 06/22/89 30346 06/22/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ********************** . PAGE 0018 DATE 06/22/89 I INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $3.206.51 R HAWTHONE POLICE DEPARTMENT 00172 001-400-2101-4316 00388 $43.89 WORD PROC/S. SCOTT 06/05/89 POLICE /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************** *******w*************** R HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY SYSTEM MAINT/JUNE 89 V1W97 $43.89 00149 001-400-1206-4201 00567 $1.223.00 07V1W97 06/01/89 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R STEVE*JOHNSON SOUND TECH/JUN 3.89 R STEVE*JOHNSON SOUND TECH/MAY 25-27.89 *** VENDOR TOTAL 01769 06/13/89 01769 06/01/89 R JONCICH. STURM & ASSOCIATES PD REMODEL 1059 001-400-4601-4201 00350 COMM RESOURCES 001-400-4601-4201 00351 COMM RESOURCES $1.223.00 $131.25 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $255.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ************************************ 02159 01/27/89 $386.25 78924 30347 $0.00 06/22/89 00009 30348 $0.00 06/22/89 07793 30349 $0.00 06/22/89 07787 30349 $0.00 06/22/89 001-400-8606-4201 00071 $454.70 1059 08839 30350 CIP 87-606 /CONTRACT SERVICE PRIVATE $0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $454.70 R JUCKES-HUBBARD WORK GUAR REFUND 02562 001-210-0000-2110 74815 06/15/89 02948 $75.00 74815 08445 30351 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * R KANE BALLMER & BERKMAN LEGAL SERV/MAV 89 VENDOR TOTAL 00130 001-400-1131-4201 00499 05/31/89 CITY ATTORNEY $75.00 $450.75 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R KELLY PAPER COMPANY *450. 75 06700 30352 $0.00 06/22/89 00212 001-400-1208-4305 00639 $1.603.36 111932 07397 30353 COPIER PAPER 11932 06/13/89 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 06/22/89 . FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL R KETCH -ALL COMPANY EXT POLE REP. PART CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0019 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *1.603. 36 00483 001-400-2401-4309 00108 $7.59 907J 06/13/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL rrr**rrr*rrrr**r*rrr****r*rrrr***rrr**rrrrrr*rrr**rrrr*rrrr****rrr** R MICHAEL*LADD COMP CONS/MAY 89 01978 001-400-1206-4201 00565 *1.201.83 020 06/08/89 *7. 59 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL **rrrrrrrr***rrrr***rrrr***r*r****rrrr*r*rrr*rrrrrr**r*rrr*r*rrrr**r R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHGS/MAY 89 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHGS/MAY 89 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHCS/MAY 89 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHGS/MAY 89 *** VENDOR TOTAL 00167 001-400-3103-4309 00854 05/31/89 ST MAINTENANCE 00167 001-400-4204-4309 01343 05/31/89 BLDG MAINT 00167 001-400-6101-4309 00704 05/31/89 PARKS 00167 105-400-8202-4309 00063 05/31/89 CIP 85-202 41.201.83 $27.16 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $79.68 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $241.28 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *51.84 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE. INC. MISC CHGS/MAY 89 R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE. INC. MISC CHGS/MAY 89 00077 001-400-4202-4305 00388 05/31/89 PUB WKS ADMIN 00077 125-400-8508-4201 00015 05/31/89 CIP 85-508 $399.96 *61. 98 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $75.77 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT rrr VENDOR TOTAL ****rrrr*rrr*r*rrrrrr*rrr*rrr*rrrrrrrrr*****rrr*r**rrr*rrrrrrrr*rrr* R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. INIT UNIFORM/POLICE RECR 25891 01320 001-400-2101-4187 00261 05/18/89 POLICE $137.75 *654. 63 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE rrr VENDOR TOTAL rrrr**r*****r***rrr*****rrr*rrr*r*rrr***rrrrrr***rrr****rrrrrrrr*rrr R LOS ANGELES CO DISTRICT ATTY LEGAL SERV/FEB 89 2-9 $654.63 00386 001-400-1131-4251 00086 *165.17 05/26/89 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 907J 08731 30354 $7.60 06/22/89 020 08738 30355 *0.00 06/22/89 00531 30356 $0.00 06/22/89 00531 30356 40.00 06/22/89 00531 30356 *0.00 06/22/89 00531 30356 $0.00 06/22/89 00533 30357 $0.00 06/22/89 00533 30357 $0.00 06/22/89 25891 08582 30358 $844.10 06/22/89 2-9 07546 30359 $0.00 06/22/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL **************** ► ****** ►* ►****** r****** ►**** ►iH►**w***************** R LOUIS THE TAILOR. INC. UNIFORM/RECRUIT GAINES 43051 R LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. INIT UNIFORM/REC MICHEL 43048 R LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. MISC CHGS/MAY 89 00079 04/26/89 00079 04/18/89 00079 05/31/89 001-400-2101-4187 00259 POLICE 001-400-2101-4187 00260 POLICE 001-400-2101-4187 00262 *30.35 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE PAGE 0020 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $165.17 *437.29 243093/243051 07951 30360 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *437.02 06/22/89 *426.64 243047/0243048 07950 30360 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *437.02 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MICHAEL*LUDWIG WORK GUAR REFUND *** VENDOR TOTAL 02884 001-210-0000-2110 67051 06/15/89 $894.28 00534 30360 *0.00 06/22/89 02954 *75.00 67051 08449 30361 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00 06/22/89 ******************************************************************** R MAIN ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. MISC CHCS/MAY 89 *** VENDOR TOTAL *75. 00 00426 105-400-8203-4309 00033 *801.28 05/31/89 CIP 85-203 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 *801.28 01859 001-400-1212-4188 01411 *877.82 06/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 105-400-2601-4188 00753 *27.87 06/15/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 110-400-3301-4188 00725 *2.74 06/15/89 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 110-400-3302-4188 00954 *173.55 06/15/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 145-400-3401-4188 00692 *1.10 06/15/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 145-400-3402-4188 00692 06/15/89 *0. 36 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00535 30362 *0.00 06/22/89 00041 30363 *0.00 06/22/89 00041 30363 *0.00 06/22/89 00041 30363 *0.00 06/22/89 00041 30363 *0.00 06/22/89 00041 30363 *0.00 06/22/89 00041 30363 *0.00 06/22/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 *** VENDOR TOTAL * * * CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 01859 145-400-3403-4188 00142 06/15/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY 01859 155-400-2102-4188 00363 06/15/89 CROSSING GUARD 01859 160-400-3102-4188 00697 06/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN 01859 705-400-1209-4188 00110 06/15/89 LIABILITY INS 01859 705-400-1217-4188 00109 06/15/89 WORKERS COMP R MARK IV CHARTER BUS LINES BUS RENTAL/SUMMER PROD 56654 VENDOR TOTAL $0.55 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2.29 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $21.93 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2.29 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $4.58 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS **************** 01424 001-400-4601-4308 00182 06/21/89 COMM RESOURCES PAGE 0021 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO N CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1.115.08 $347.10 /PROGRAM MATERIALS R MERCURY AIR GROUP GASOLINE/CITY YARD R MERCURY AIR GROUP GASOLINE/CITY YARD 02537 001-141-0000-1401 00045 65526 06/07/89 02537 001-141-0000-1401 00046 65526 06/07/89 $347.10 $4.120.21 /GASOLINE INVENTORY $1,885.07 /GASOLINE INVENTORY *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************************************a*. R MICHAEL*MORENO CITE COURT BAIL REFUND 06235 02881 110-300-0000-3302 27926 06/16/89 $6.005.28 00041 30363 $0.00 06/22/89 00041 30363 $0.00 06/22/89 00041 30363 $0.00 06/22/89 00041 30363 $0.00 06/22/89 00041 30363 $0.00 06/22/89 056654 07759 30364 $0.00 06/22/89 65526 08832 30365 $0.00 06/22/89 65526 08833 30365 $0.00 06/22/89 $18.00 806235 08745 30366 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 06/22/89 r** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $18.00 R NATIONS PRINTING 00725 001-400-1202-4305 00232 $52.19 COPIES/BUDGET WORKSHOP 94840 06/13/89 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $52.19 R PATTY JAY*NEAL 01722 001-210-0000-2110 WORK GUAR REFUND 76994 06/15/89 894840 07399 30367 $0.00 06/22/89 02957 $500.00 76994 08435 30368 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 06/22/89 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R KEVIN 8.*NORTHCRAFT MON EXP/JUNE 89 PAGE 0022 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $500.00 02064 001-400-1201-4317 00185 $42.03 06/21/89 CITY MANAGER /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R OCHOA & SILLAS LEGAL SERV/MAY 89 00095 001-400-1131-4201 00500 3172 05/25/89 CITY ATTORNEY *42.03 09101 30369 $0.00 06/22/89 $53.30 3172 06699 30370 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R OLIVER. STOEVER. BARR & LEGAL SERV/MAV 89 *** VENDOR TOTAL *53.30 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00498 $3.452.00 05/31/89 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R OLYMPIC CREATIONS DARE T-SHIRTS *** VENDOR TOTAL 02580 001-400-2101-4305 01025 5690 05/09/89 210004 POLICE R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 $3.452.00 $470.09 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES **************** $470.09 00235 001-400-1212-4188 01415 *1.151.52 06/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00235 105-400-2601-4188 00756 $52.71 06/15/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00235 110-400-3301-4188 00728 $4.32 06/15/89 VEH PKC DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00235 110-400-3302-4188 00958 $339.67 06/15/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00235 145-400-3401-4188 00696 $0.58 06/15/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00235 145-400-3402-4188 00697 $0.29 06/15/89 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 06697 30371 $0.00 06/22/89 5690 08587 30372 $470.88 06/22/89 00019 30373 $0.00 06/22/89 00019 30373 *0.00 06/22/89 00019 30373 $0.00 06/22/89 00019 30373 $0.00 06/22/89 00019 30373 $0.00 06/22/89 00019 30373 $0.00 06/22/89 1 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00235 155-400-2102-4188 00366 06/15/89 CROSSING GUARD 00235 160-400-3102-4188 00700 06/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN $5.93 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $43.09 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL ****** l►,I►,I ** ****w******** *************** ►;Iwo ************** ******** R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMP HOOKUP/JUN 89 00321 001-400-2101-4304 06/01/89 POLICE PAGE 0023 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1.598.11 00388 $164.96 /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/JUL 89 INS/JUL 89 INS/JUL 89 INS/JUL 89 INS/JUL 89 INS/JUL 89 INS/JUL 89 INS/JUL 89 INS/JUL 89 00575 06/15/89 00575 06/15/89 00575 06/15/89 00575 06/15/89 00575 06/15/89 00575 06/15/89 00575 06/15/89 00575 06/15/89 00575 06/15/89 $164.96 001-400-1212-4188 01413 $12.321.98 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 105-400-2601-4188 00754 $495.56 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 110-400-3301-4188 00726 VEH PKG DIST 110-400-3302-4188 00956 PARKING ENF 145-400-3401-4188 00694 DIAL A RIDE 145-400-3402-4188 ESEA $30.88 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *2.030.15 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *7.21 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00694 *2.06 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 145-400-3403-4188 00143 BUS PASS SUBSDY 155-400-2102-4188 00364 $4.12 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $45.37 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 160-400-3102-4188 00698 SEWER/ST DRAIN $355.00 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $15.292.33 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PAGENET PAGING SERV/JUN 89 00019 30373 $0.00 06/22/89 00019 30373 $0.00 06/22/89 00036 30374 $0.00 06/22/89 00016 30375 $0.00 06/22/89 00016 30375 $0.00 06/22/89 00016 30375 $0.00 06/22/89 00016 30375 $0.00 06/22/89 00016 30375 $0.00 06/22/89 00016 30375 $0.00 06/22/89 00016 30375 $0.00 06/22/89 00016 30375 $0.00 06/22/89 00016 30375 $0.00 06/22/89 02487 001-400-1201-4201 00052 $11.50 14234—C 00059 234—C 06/01/89 CITY MANAGER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 30376 06/22/89 • . FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R PAGENET PAGING SERV/JUN 89 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 11 AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02487 001-400-2101-4307 00177 $115.00 234-C 06/01/89 POLICE /RADIO MAINTENANCE R OTTO*PALMER WORK GUAR REFUND 02894 001-210-0000-2110 67036 06/19/89 1 PAGE 0024 DATE 06/22/89 1 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $126.50 02950 $4,830.36 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************a+r********** * * * R DEBI*PATTERSON WORK GUAR REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 02886 001-210-0000-2110 02958 77028 06/15/89 R PENINSULA AVIATION COMPANY SURV/NARC INVEST/0173 33707 ************** $4.830.36 14234-C 00059 30376 $0.00 06/22/89 67036 08451 30377 $0.00 06/22/89 $100.00 77028 08437 30378 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 06/22/89 $100. 00 02878 170-400-2103-4201 00013 $282.50 233707 06/12/89 SPEC INVESTQTNS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R R R R R R R PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EAP/JAN-JUN 89 1690I PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EAP/JAN-JUN 89 1690I PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EAP/JAN-JUN 89 1690I PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EAP/JAN-JUN 89 1690I PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EAP/JAN-JUN 89 1690I PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EAP/JAN-JUN 89 1690I PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EAP/JAN-JUN 89 1690I 02746 001-400-1212-4188 01414 06/01/89 EMP BENEFITS 02746 105-400-2601-4188 00755 06/01/89 STREET LIGHTING 02746 110-400-3301-4188 00727 06/01/89 VEH PKQ DIST 02746 110-400-3302-4188 00957 06/01/89 PARKING ENF 02746 145-400-3401-4188 00695 06/01/89 DIAL A RIDE 02746 145-400-3402-4188 00695 06/01/89 ESEA 02746 145-400-3402-4188 00696 06/01/89 ESEA $282.50 *1.641.48 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $36.60 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $3.60 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $210.60 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $6.72 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2.28 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.72 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 08938 30379 $0.00 06/22/89 1690I 00011 30380 $0.00 06/22/89 1690I 00011 30380 $0.00 06/22/89 1690I 00011 30380 $0.00 06/22/89 1690I 00011 30380 $0.00 06/22/89 1690I 00011 30380 $0.00 06/22/89 1690I 00011 30380 $0.00 06/22/89 1690I 00011 30380 $0.00 06/22/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION * * * R R R R PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EAP/JAN-JUN 89 1690I PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EAP/JAN-JUN 89 1690I PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EAP/JAN-JUN 89 1690I PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EAP/JAN-JUN 89 1690I VENDOR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02746 155-400-2102-4188 00365 43.00 06/01/89 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02746 160-400-3102-4188 00699 430.00 06/01/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02746 705-400-1209-4188 00112 43.00 06/01/89 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02746 705-400-1217-4188 00111 46.00 06/01/89 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TOTAL******************************************************************** R PERVO PAINT CO. TRAFFIC PAINT *** VENDOR TOTAL 01316 001-400-3104-4309 00253 70201 06/13/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY PAGE 0025 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1. 944. 00 1690I 00011 30380 $0.00 06/22/89 1690I 00011 30380 $0.00 06/22/89 1690I 00011 30380 $0.00 06/22/89 1690I 00011 30380 $0.00 06/22/89 $3.770.10 70201 08829 30381 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $3.770.10 06/22/89 R POSTMASTER P.O. BOX RENTAL *** VENDOR TOTAL 00097 001-400-2101-4305 695 06/12/89 POLICE $3. 770. 10 01028 $39.00 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R POSTMASTER NEW BULK MAIL PERMIT *** VENDOR TOTAL *39. 00 00398 110-400-3302-4305 00581 $60.00 460 06/15/89 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R VINCENT*POZZULOII WORK GUAR REFUND ****************************** 02890 001-210-0000-2110 74758 06/15/89 $60. 00 695 08935 30382 $0.00 06/22/89 460 08743 30383 $0.00 06/22/89 02947 *75.00 74758 08444 30384 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. CTY SHARE/AUTO-HME/JUL89 R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. CTY SHARE/AUTO-HME/JUL89 *75. 00 00585 001-400-1212-4188 01421 $77.25 06/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00585 105-400-2601-4188 00761 $0.50 06/15/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00038 30385 $0.00 06/22/89 00038 30385 $0.00 06/22/89 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. CTY SHARE/AUTO-HME/JUL89 R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. CTY SHARE/AUTO-HME/JUL89 R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. CTY SHARE/AUTO-HME/JUL89 R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. CTY SHARE/AUTO-HME/JUL89 R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. CTY SHARE/AUTO-HME/JUL89 *** VENDOR TOTAL * * * VND * DATE INVC CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00585 110-400-3301-4188 00733 06/15/89 VEH PKG DIST 00585 110-400-3302-4188 00963 06/15/89 PARKING ENF 00585 160-400-3102-4188 00705 06/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN 00585 705-400-1209-4188 00114 06/15/89 LIABILITY INS 00585 705-400-1217-4188 00113 06/15/89 WORKERS COMP R KARI*PROPECK MILES/DISPATCHER COURSE 02713 001-400-2101-4312 00955 06/05/89 POLICE $0.50 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $4.25 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.00 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.25 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.25 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PAGE 0026 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $86.00 $250.38 /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************.*******.***** R QUAIL & COOK COURT REP/WOLCOTT 00409 001-400-1203-4201 00517 91734 05/31/89 PERSONNEL $250.38 00038 30385 $0.00 06/22/89 00038 30385 $0.00 06/22/89 00038 30385 $0.00 06/22/89 00038 30385 $0.00 06/22/89 00038 30385 $0.00 06/22/89 08925 30386 $0.00 06/22/89 $505.00 91734 08269 30387 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $505.00 R READICARE MEDICAL GROUP -LAX PRE -EMP EXAMS/MAY 89 23034 02390 001-400-1203-4320 00260 06/07/89 PERSONNEL $774.00 /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $774.00 R RICH GRAPHICS SUMMER BROCHURE PRINTING 2034 *r* VENDOR TOTAL 00224 001-400-4601-4302 00053 $1.618.80 06/05/89 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING R RMRS SYSTEMS POSTAGE METER MONIES ******************** $1.618.80 00300 001-400-1208-4305 00640 $2.000.00 06/12/89 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 94-23034 08274 30388 $0.00 06/22/89 2034 07781 30389 $1.570.88 06/22/89 08009 30390 $0.00 06/22/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 PAGE 0027 DATE 06/22/89 PAY VENDOR NAME VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL *****************e************ **** ►waw***** ► ******** ►************* $2.000.00 R SCOTT*ROBINSON HONDA. INC. 02145 001-400-2101-4311 00683 *168.46 16423 08911 30391 CARE REPAIR/HONDA 16423 05/22/89 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************►****************************** R DAN*RODRIGUEZ 02899 001-300-0000-3808 00071 REF VAR APP FEE 56999 06/06/89 *168. 46 *320. 00 /ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *320. 00 56999 08610 30392 *0.00 06/22/89 R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES 01578 001-400-4202-4201 00251 *687.50 017-001 08840 30393 ENG SERV/MAY 89 7-001 06/01/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** *687. 50 R S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS. INC. 00227 001-400-4601-4308 00184 *161.60 489903 07772 30394 SUMMER PARK PROGRAM SUPP 89903 05/18/89 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS *165.03 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL *161.60 R SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 00021 001-400-3104-5499 00010 *761.74 33694 08811 30395 STREET SIGNS 33694 05/24/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS *761.74 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *761.74 R LARISSA*SARMANIAN 02717 001-400-2101-4312 00956 *143.52 08926 30396 MILES/DISPATCHER COURSE 06/05/89 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST *0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $143.52 R SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 00151 001-400-2101-4316 00389 *1.537.00 62031 08912 30397 RECRUIT MEALS 62031 05/31/89 POLICE /TRAINING *0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *1. 537. 00 R ETTA*SIMPSON 01961 001-400-1101-4317 00334 *15.00 06698 30398 MON EXP/JUNE 89 06/19/89 CITY COUNCIL /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *0.00 06/22/89 - t FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION MMM VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. MISC CHAS/MAY 89 MMM VENDOR TOTAL 01399 02985 05/31/89 MMMMMM****** MM MMMMMM 001-400-4204-4309 01340 BLDG MAINT PAGE 0028 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $15.00 $41.85 25-02985 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R DONALDMSING ANIMAL TRAP REFUND *41.85 02887 001-210-0000-2110 02960 $50.00 80498 06/15/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE MMM VENDOR TOTALMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM*MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER MISC CHGS/JUN 89 $50.00 00113 001-400-2201-4309 00700 $15.98 06/15/89 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS MMM VENDOR TOTALMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITE COURT BAIL R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITE COURT BAIL 75811 00400 110-300-0000-3302 27924 06/08/89 00400 110-300-0000-3302 27927 06/15/89 /COURT /COURT MMM VENDOR TOTALMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMM R SOUTH BAY SERVICE & SUPPLY CO. AIR COND SERVICE 70-71 VENDOR TOTAL $15.98 $220.00 FINES/PARKING $124.00 FINES/PARKING $344.00 02510 001-400-4204-4309 01339 $252.78 06/07/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS MMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHGS/MAY 89 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHCS/MAY 89 MMM VENDOR TOTAL 00018 001-400-3103-4309 00853 05/31/89 ST MAINTENANCE 00018 105-400-2601-4309 00492 05/31/89 STREET LIGHTING *252.78 $13.95 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $13.95 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLS/MAY 89 $27.90 00159 001-400-3101-4303 00044 $54.92 05/31/89 MEDIANS /UTILITIES 00546 30399 $0.00 06/22/89 80498 08439 30400 $0.00 06/22/89 00648 30401 $0.00 06/22/89 08739 30402 $0.00 06/22/89 775811 08744 30402 $0.00 06/22/89 9070-71 08838 30403 $0.00 06/22/89 00551 30404 $0.00 06/22/89 00551 30404 $0.00 06/22/89 00552 30405 $0.00 06/22/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R R R R R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLS/MAY 89 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLS/MAY 89 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLS/MAY 89 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLS/MAY 89 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLS/MAY 89 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00159 001-400-3104-4303 00022 $540.69 05/31/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /UTILITIES 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00316 $5,799.39 05/31/89 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00257 $1.204.81 05/31/89 PARKS /UTILITIES 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00193 $262.72 05/31/89 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00108 $43.41 05/31/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /UTILITIES R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ST LIGHT BILLS/MAY 89 *** VENDOR TOTAL PAGE 0029 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ******************** $7.905.94 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00194 $14.694.00 05/31/89 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP WATER COOLER RENT/MAY 89 40942 00146 05/31/89 001-400-4601-4305 00689 COMM RESOURCES $14.694.00 00552 30405 $0.00 06/22/89 00552 30405 $0.00 06/22/89 00552 30405 $0.00 06/22/89 00552 30405 $0.00 06/22/89 00552 30405 $0.00 06/22/89 00013 30406 $0.00 06/22/89 $40.69 540942 00033 30407 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO SWEEP SERV/MAY 89 384CM R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO SWEEP SERV/MAY 89 384CM *** VENDOR TOTAL * * * 00115 05/31/89 00115 05/31/89 001-400-3103-4201 00225 ST MAINTENANCE 110-400-3301-4201 00215 VEH PKG DIST R SPECIALTY RECREATION EQUIP. 61 PANELS SPORT FENCES 89107 VENDOR TOTAL *40.69 $1.216.00 2372/2384CM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $3.552.00 2372/2384CM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ************************* $4.768.00 00029 30408 $0.00 06/22/89 00029 30408 $0.00 06/22/89 02843 125-400-8502-5401 00002 $7.780.84 89107 08821 06/01/89 CIP 85-502 /EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $50 $7.780.84 ******************************************************************** R SUPERIOR PRINTERS AN CONT NOTICES TO APPEA 22925 $7.780.84 02750 001-400-2401-4305 00111 $639.00 03/22/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 30409 06/22/89 22925 07862 30410 $639.00 06/22/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL *****************+t** ► ► ► ► ►***** ►*****a****** ►************************ R CHAD*THAGARD WORK GUAR REFUND 02885 001-210-0000-2110 74801 06/19/89 PAGE 0030 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *639. 00 02956 $175.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R R R R R R R R R R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY MISC CHGS/MAY 89 TODD PIPE & SUPPLY MISC CHOS/MAY 89 *** VENDOR TOTAL * * * *175. 00 00124 001-400-3101-4309 00030 *30.11 05/31/89 MEDIANS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00124 001-400-6101-4309 00702 *176.83 05/31/89 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 VENDOR TOTAL ********************************** *206. 94 00240 001-400-1212-4188 01419 *196.35 06/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 105-400-2601-4188 00760 *1.52 06/15/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 110-400-3301-4188 00732 *7.05 06/15/89 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 110-400-3302-4188 00962 *10.58 06/15/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 145-400-3401-4188 00700 *0.94 06/15/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 145-400-3402-4188 00701 *0.38 06/15/89 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 155-400-2102-4188 00370 *1.76 06/15/89 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 160-400-3102-4188 00704 *3.04 06/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R TRIMEN SALES. INC. *221.62 00119 001-400-4205-4310 00138 *527.18 MOTOR OIL/CITY YARD 41857 06/15/89 EQUIP SERVICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 74801 08447 30411 *0.00 06/22/89 00557 30412 *0.00 06/22/89 00557 30412 *0.00 06/22/89 00029 30413 *0.00 06/22/89 00029 30413 *0.00 06/22/89 00029 30413 *0.00 06/22/89 00029 30413 *0.00 06/22/89 00029 30413 *0.00 06/22/89 00029 30413 *0.00 06/22/89 00029 30413 *0.00 06/22/89 00029 30413 *0.00 06/22/89 141857 08835 30414 *527.17 06/22/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL R UNIFORCE CORPORATION VEHICLE MAINT SOFTWARE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 PAGE 0031 DATE 06/22/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *527. 18 01720 001-400-1206-4201 00566 *14.981.00 890606 08174 30415 90606 06/05/89 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $14.981.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R UNIFORM DELIGHT SAFETY BOOTS/OSEKOWSKV 02486 001-400-2201-4187 00139 51383 06/09/89 FIRE *14.981.00 $133.13 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 02355 001-400-1212-4188 01418 06/15/89 EMP BENEFITS 02355 105-400-2601-4188 00759 06/15/89 STREET LIGHTING 02355 110-400-3301-4188 00731 06/15/89 VEH PKG DIST 02355 110-400-3302-4188 00961 06/15/89 PARKING ENF 02355 145-400-3401-4188 00699 06/15/89 DIAL A RIDE 02355 145-400-3402-4188 00700 06/15/89 ESEA 02355 145-400-3403-4188 00146 06/15/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY 02355 155-400-2102-4188 00369 06/15/89 CROSSING GUARD 02355 160-400-3102-4188 00703 06/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN *133. 13 $748.08 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $24.68 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *1. 80 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *134. 73 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.99 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.32 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *0. 49 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2.05 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *19. 20 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R UNITED AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 89 $932.34 02697 001-400-1212-4188 01420 $80.00 06/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 51383 08319 30416 *0.00 06/22/89 00028 30417 $0.00 06/22/89 00028 30417 $0.00 06/22/89 00028 30417 *0.00 06/22/89 00028 30417 *0.00 06/22/89 00028 30417 $0.00 06/22/89 00028 30417 $0.00 06/22/89 00028 30417 *0.00 06/22/89 00028 30417 $0.00 06/22/89 00028 30417 $0.00 06/22/89 00065 30418 $0.00 06/22/89 • • • • • 1 1 • • • • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:37:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/27/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************* ►* ** ►*** ****** ►* ► ►* ►**************** ►******r* * * * R UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE CITE NOTICE BAIL PAGE 0032 DATE 06/22/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *80. 00 00740 110-400-3302-4305 00579 $2.000.00 06/08/89 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R J. S. *WARD & CO. AS AGENT FOR REIMB LIAB/MAV 89 R J. S. *WARD & CO. AS AGENT FOR REIMS LIAB/MAY 89 02466 705-400-1209-4201 00097 05/31/89 $2.000.00 *5. 691. 00 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 02466 705-400-1209-4324 00099 05/31/89 *1.255.85 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R WESTERN GRAPHICS LETTERING MACHINE TAPES 5887 *** VENDOR TOTAL *6.946.85 02873 001-400-4204-4309 01345 $346.12 06/15/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS STOP -SIGN WITH HANDLE 55857 00131 155-400-2102-4187 00072 05/31/89 *346. 12 *58. 49 CROSSING GUARD /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SALLY A. *WHITE SEC SERV/JUN 6. 89 *58. 49 00140 001-400-4102-4201 00211 *382.50 06/14/89 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R STEVE*WISNIEWSKI MON EXP/APR-MAY 89 01364 001-400-2101-4316 05/31/89 POLICE *382. 50 00390 $52.00 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BYRON L.*WOOSLEY PROF SERV/SEWER IMPROV *52. 00 02698 160-400-8407-4201 00001 $800.00 05/30/89 CIP 88-407 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 08740 30419 $0.00 06/22/89 08273 30420 •0.00 06/22/89 08273 30420 $0.00 06/22/89 5887 08826 30421 $346.12 06/22/89 155857 08721 30422 *55.38 06/22/89 08611 30423 $0.00 06/22/89 08929 30424 *0.00 06/22/89 08841 30425 $0.00 06/22/89 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0033 TIME 17:37:54 FOR 06/27/89 DATE 06/22/89 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL u+►*** ******************a*wawa*******e****************************** aa* * * * * * * *boo. 00 R WRAY PRINTING 00132 001-400-2101-4305 01022 *79.88 3777 08905 30426 D. A. R. E. RAFFLE TICKETS 3777 05/26/89 210004 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *79.87 06/22/89 VENDOR TOTAL *79.88 R C. EVAN*WRIGHT 02299 001-210-0000-2110 02955 *1.575.00 70590 08448 30427 WORK GUAR REFUND 70590 06/15/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00 06/22/89 VENDOR TOTAL ************************************ *1. 575. 00 R BONNIE*WULFF 01305 001-210-0000-2110 02959 *50.00 77017 08438 30428 WORK GUAR REFUND 77017 06/15/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00 06/22/89 VENDOR TOTAL ****************************************************** *50. 00 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-4201 00553 *19.01 21004969 09201 30429 EXCESS METER USE/MAY 89 04969 06/07/89 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 06/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *** PAY CODE TOTAL******a*********************************************************** *** TOTAL WARRANT8****************************************************************** *19. 01 *186. 618. 90 *698.282. 57 1 HLIaUt CLN111 Y 111A1 THC DIMAtIDS .AIM6 GOVERN 1111 WARRANTS LISTCD ON PAG - / 'TO 0�LUIIVE OP TML WARRANT REGISTER FOR - REA0006A1g ANp FU •SAHE ILABLE FOR PAYM NT THEREOF1 *Y FINANCE #DMI OATF 6Z Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council June 21, 1989 City Council Meeting of June 27, 1989 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Responsible Agent July 11, 1989 Recognition of Police Officer Charles Lewis' return to duty following a catastrophic injury Consent Calendar Recommendation re. Pier concession contract Accept CIP 88-614 as complete - Pier Storm Damage CIP 88-406 Call for Bids - Sewers Target Area 4 Suggested last meeting to approve ballot measures and wording July, 25, 1989 Suggested last meeting to call election and adopt resolutions with final ballot wording Municipal Matters Review of City Goals October 24, 1989 Last meeting to adopt resolution re. tie vote Personnel Director Community Resources Dir. Public Works Director Public Works Director City Clerk City Clerk City Manager City Clerk ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Accept as complete Community Center air conditioning RFP for cost allocation plan Recreational Vehicle ordinance Development of design standards and criteria by which to review projects for EIRS Public Works Director Finance Administrator General Services Director Planning Director lc Adoption of Uniform Fire, Building and Plumbing Codes Public Safety/Building Fire Sprinkler Ordinance Public Safety Director Ordinance amending provision against selling gasoline and alcohol at same location Policy on motorcycles Planning Dept. Project Timetable City Attorney Pubic Safety Director Planning Director ***************************************************************** June 19, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of June 27, 1989 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS MAY 1989 The attached financial reports represent 917e of the fiscal year. Total revenue for all funds is 95.1% received with the General Fund at 98.370. 'Department estimates contained in the 1989-90 preliminary budget suggest that revenue will probably be over budget by at least $200,000. These estimates appear to be very conservative, however, compared to the May revenue report. If so, this will result in a higher fund balance than the one used in the 89-90 budget. Expenditures for all funds are at 73.7' for 9170 of the year. The General Fund is 84.87 expended or under budget by $720,415. Department estimates in the 89-90 preliminary budget suggest that by year end, expenditures will be under budget by more than $300,000. Concur: Bevin B. Orth City Manager Attachments VC/sl Viki Copelan Finance Administrator 1 do) FINANCE-FA484 TIME 20:00:23 - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) r•5 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 eiTE e !'UND OBJ DESCRIPTION PAGE 0001 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE06/14/T r+;f 00I GENERAL FUND 9 EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE UNRL'ALIZED al BALANCE DEPARTMENT 0000 12 3100 TAXES — }i 3101 r`'°� 3102 /CURRENT YEAR SECURED '5 1 3103 /CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED `2' 325, 087. 00 163, 090. 18 ,c �'-�-- !PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 167, 136. 000. 2. 265, 606. 09 59, 480. 91 3106 /SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL 98813 150, 000. 00 13, 251, 00 169, 518. 78 97. 4 310710, 815. 88 2, 382. 78- 101. 4 3108 /TRANSFER TAX 60, 000. 00 7, 096. 88 60, 815. 88- 122, 940. 00 82, 388. 24 140. 5 3110 -- /SALES TAX 13, 116. 95 22, 388. 24- t - /CABLE - TV FRANCHISE 1.673, 628. Op 153, 100. 00 11 T 344. 21 5, 595. 79 137. 3 r '> 3111 96, 138. 00 1, 553, 356. 69 -, 95. 4 r' 3112 /E-ECTRIC FRANCHISE 25, 912. 74 100, 590. 74 120, 271. 31 • 92 8 -- /GAS FRANCHISE 34, 580. 00 O. 00 4, 452. 74- 3213 --- -- - !REFUSE FRANCHISE 34, 000. 00 O 00 34, 895. J1 325. 52- 104. 6 /',z3 3114 107, O00. 00 - 33, 306. 64 107. 9 za 3115 /TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY 23, 994.37 693. 36 97 9 /BUSINESS LICENSE 168, 394. 00 33, 869. 95 114, 792.85 7, 792. 85— as 3120 - - 475,.000. 00 158, 418. 16 107. 2 ' OBJECT SUBTOTAL /UTILITY USER TAX 47, 557. 84 9, 975. 84 94. O 0. 00 363, 092. 07 111, 907. 93 27 5, 413. 903. 00 0. 00 0. 00 76. 4 —" 3200 LICENSES AND PERMITS480, 990. 23 5, 204, 125. 86 Inc 77 0' 00 O. 0 �" ., 3202 3203 /DOG LICENSES /BICYCLE LICENSES 14, 000. 00 590. 00 3204 -- !BUILDING PERMITS-- 100. 00 r` 3205 /ELECTRIC PERMITS 173, 000. 00 180. 80 3 � _ 3206 /PLUMBINGECTRI38, 000. 00 13, 325. OS 3207 /NPERMITS SS 30, 000. 00 5, 130, 00 r`3J 3209 /GARAGE SALES 2. 130. 00 s _ 3210 6, 000. 00 300. 00 ;it -- :n ` 3211 /BINGO PERMITS 65. 00 12. 00 ...--_- ._---- 200. 00 /BANNER PERMITS %1.. 3212 /ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS 1, 800. 00 0. 00 3213 /ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE 150.00 200.00 r °0__ _.._..__ 3214 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL - /AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT---- 3' 500. 00 455. 00 155. 00 90. 00 42 266, 970. 00 ----23, 239. 85 (°4I to °, 48 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES _ 3301 /VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS 3303 /COURT FINES/POLICE100,000.00 DEPT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 35, 000, qp 14, 520. 96 135, 000. 00 4' 389. 09 18, 910. 05 3400 USE OF MONEY &,PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 3402 /RENTS &127, 000. 00 CONCESSIONS 17,175.66 3403 /PIER REVENUE1, 500. 00 3404 - /COMM CTR LEASES 9, 960. 00 100. 00 3405 /COMM CTR RENTALS - - 68, 000. 00 --_ _ 06 00 3406 50, 000. 00 -4' 0644. . 00 /COMM CTR THEATRE 3, 486. 00 14, 000. 00 4. 263. 00 14, 851. 75 228. 80 188, 391. 32 36, 997. 00 25, 333. 00 4. 735. 00 65. 00 50. 00 2, 044. 79 170. 00 3, 790. 00 290. Op 276, 946. 66 114, 815. 28 37, 687. 57 152, 502. 85 175, 102. 51 I,321.88 9. 235. 80 - 67, 660. 50 43, 925. 44 18, 588, 63 851. 75- 128. 80- 15, 391. 32- 1, 003. 00 4, 66,7. 00 1, 265. 00 0: 00 150. 00 244. 79- •20. 00- 290. 00- 135. 00- 9, 976. 66- 14, 815. 28- 2, 687. 57- 17, 502. es - 48,102. 51-• 1.78. 12 724. 20 339. 50' 6..074.. 56 4, 588. 63 106. 0 228. 8 108. 8 97. 3 84. 4 78. 9 100. 0 25. 0 113. 5 113. 3 108. 2 187. 0 103, 7 114. 8 107. 6 112. 9 137. 8 88. 1 92. 7 99. 5 87. 8 132. 7 P.5 FINANCE-FA484. TIME '2Q:00:23. FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) • FUND 013d DESCRIPTION r 8 ; 001 GENERAL 9 r :) • r<, 47 r- 41. 69 • 61 r 6, 49l FUND DEPARTMENY 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY•& PROPERTY - - 3411 -- /OTHER FACILITIES -- --------- - 50, 000. 00 3412 /TENNIS COURTS 12, 500.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 332, 960. 00 EST REV 3$00 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3504 3505 3507 3508 3509-- 3510 509-.3510 3511 3514 3515 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /IN LIEU OFF HIGHWAY 350.00 -- -/IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE- ---- -- 636, 204. 00 /HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE 4. 000. 00 /MANDATED COSTS 0.00 - /HOMEOWNER- PROP- TX- RELIE - 64, 000. 00 /POST 17, 500. 00 /STC -SVC OFF TRAINING 8.500.00 /CIGARETTE TAX • - - 52, 000. 00 /SUPPLEMENTAL SUBVENTION 12.627.00 795, 181. 00 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3603 /RECYCLING FEASIBILITY OBJECT -SUBTOTAL ---- -- --... 3800 CURRENT 3801 3802 3803 3806 3808 3809 3810 3811 3812 3013 3814 3815 3816 3817 3818 3819 3820 3821 .3823 3824 3825 SERVICE CHARGES /RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION /SIGN REVIEW /ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT -- /BOARD OF APPEALS /ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW '/TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW --------/FINAL-MAP REVIEW -- /ZONE CHANGE REVIEW /CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW /PLAN CHECK FEES /PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL /PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES /CURB/SIDEWALK REPAIR /SPECIAL CURB MARKING /POLICE' SERVICES /JAIL SERVICES /TRUSTY ADMIN FEE /FINGERPRINT SERVICE /SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY /VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES /PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 15, 000. 00 700. 00 8, 452. 00 375. 00 2, 880. 00 5, 400. 00 1, 875. 00 1. 800. 00 23, 040. 00 127, 000. 00 3, 465. 00 6, 000. 00 0. 00 300. 00 15. 000. 00 7, 735. 00 2. 775. 00 3. 000. 00 20, 000. 00 3, 000. 00 100. 00 MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 7, 332. 09 - - - - 65. 907. 39 1, 254. 25 10. 110. 20 38. 124. 43 391, 852. 35 0. 00 336. 37 59, 371. 64 • - • 622, 937. 71 0. 00 1, 594. 19 0. 00 1, 211. 00 - 22.938. 24------- 55, 680. 35 3. 075. 81 19, 211. 46 500. 00 2, 445. 38 2. 689. 25 -- - 41, 925. 01 0. 00 12, 627. 13• 88, 574. 94 757. 968. 60 0. 00 0. 00 1, 256. 50 50. 00 1, 150. 00 -- 0. 00 1. 280. 00 450. 00 500. 00 0.00 2, 400. 00 19, 325. 90 0. 00 257. 00 0. 00 25. 00 1. 687. 00 - 765. 00 510. 00 198. 00 0.00 280. 50 0. 00 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 15, 736. 50 930. 00 7, 680. 00 75. 00 4, 480. 00 . 4,957. 20 2.125.00 1,-800. 00 23. 975. 00 135. 372. 03 2, 132. 00 5.257. 35 0. 00 25. 00 14..150. 50 10, 200. 00 3, 155. 00 1. 973. 00 9, 350. 00. 2. 800. 50 90. 00 • PAGE • 0002 I DATE 06/14/89 91. 0%. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 15, 907. 39- 2, 389. 80 58, 892. 35- 13. 63 13. 266. 29 2, 405. 81 1.211.00- 8, 319. 65 1, 711. 46- 6, 054. 62 10. 074. 99 0. 13- 37. 212. 40 131. 8 80. 8 117. 6 96. 1 97. 9 39. 8 0. 0 87. 0 109. 7 28. 7 80. 6 100. 0 95. 3 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 100. 0 736. 50- 230. 00- 772. 00 300. 00 1, 600..00- 442. 0 250. 00= 0.00. 935. 00- 8. 372. 03- 1, 333. 00 742. 65 0. 00 275. 00- 80. 0•849. 60 2, 465. 00- 380. 00- 1. Q27. 00 10, 650. 00 199. 50 10.00 104. 9 132. 8 90. 8 20. 0 155. 5 91. 8 113. 3 100. 0 104. 0 106. 5 61. 5 87. 6 0. 0 8. 3 94. 3 131. 8 113. 6 65. 7 46. 7 99. 3 90. 0 • • • e2 rFIN- ANCE-FA484 . TIME 20: 00: 23 ,z ,3 f ia 15 1, r'7 • r. 26 L._P to r� 30 r:z' 5a -- rn 37 r•� 00 41 .z as I z, d8 ag n° 52 r53 se se 57F- 55 ss • FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 001 GENERAL.FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES• 3827 3831 3834 • .3836 3837 3838 3839 3840 3841 3857 3858 3859 - 3860 3861 OBJECT• SUBTOTAL 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 - --- - -- 3902 3903 3904 3907 3913 3955 OPERATING TR OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 EST REV /LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT 6, 060. 00 /STREET CUT INSPECTION 15,000.00 /ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 7.500.00 /FUMIGATION INSPECT FEE 7, 500. 00 /RETURNED CHECK CHARGE 800.00 /SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIO 1,500.00 /PHOTOCOPY CHARGES 600.00 /AMBULANCE TRANSPORT 8,000.00, /POLICE TOWING 33, 000. 00 --- - /GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - -- 1, 350. 00 /PKG PLAN APPLICATION 960.00 /TENANT REFUSE DILL ING 200.00 -/REFUSE LIEN FEE -- 500.00 /BOOTING RELEASE FEE 0.00 /HAZARDOUS MAT PERMIT 2, 500. 00 ----- -- -. _ . _ - 333, 367. 00 - -- /SALE OF REAL/PERS -PROP 397, 186. 00 - /REFUNDS/REIMS PREV YR 43, 000. 00 /CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT 3, 000. 00 /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS - 1, 500. 00 /FOUNDATION CONTRIBUTION 25,000.00 /CITY OFFICES RECYCLING 100.00 ANSFERS IN-- ------ . -.-.-- ---- _ 1, 742, 671. 00 - 2. 212, 457. 00 • -- DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL - - TOTALS MONTHLY REV ' .YEAR TO DATE • PAGE 0003 DATE 06/14/89 91.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 7. -- ' --- 0. 00 6, 060. 00 0. 00 100. 0 20, 234. 20 32, 149. 20 17, 149. 20- 214. 3 1, 341. 50 11, 323. 00 3. 823. 00- 150. 9 535.80 7.079.30 420.70 94.3 90.00 785.40 . 14.60 98. 1 231.00 . 2,258. 10 758.10- 150.5 - 54. 05 - •-- - 860. 99 260. 99- 143. 4 770.00 • 8,041.00 - 41.00- 100.5 2, 835. 00 23, 748. 70 9, 251. 30 71. 9 0.00 ' 1.3,,,50.00 0.00 100.0 • 0. 00 640. 00 • 320. 00 66. 6 20.00 - 260.60 60.00- 130.0 - - 1, 209. 76------ --- 941. 78 -- 441. 78- 188. 3 0.00 • 0. 00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 2.500.00 0.0 - 55, 036. 69 - - --- 341, 761. 55 • 8. 394. 55- 102. 5 ---9, 750: 00- 48. 12- 2. 742. 46 4, 140. 17- • 0. 00 38. 10 --153, 359. 00 142. 201. 27 387. 064. 07 69, 786. 93 6, 375. 71 122, 359. 23 25, 000. 00 • 241. 70 - 1, 600, 560. 00 2, 211, 387. 64 10, 121. 93 97. 4 26, 786. 93- 162.2 3, 375. 71- 212. 5 120, 859. 23- • 8157. 2 0. 00 100. 0 141.70- 241.7 142, 111. 00 91. 8 1, 069. 36 99. 9 - 9, 494. 838. 00 --- - 847, 077: 46-- 9. 341, 545. 51 - 153, 292. 49- 9, 494, 838. 00 847, 077. 46 9, 341, 545. 51 98. 3 '153,292.49 98. 3 • • -0: e FINANCE-FA484 . TIME 20: 00: 23 r „ 11 •_. r14l r 13 4-, 21 72 ®" 28 os 271 28 r 39 • 31 r3- FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 105 LIGHT,INQ. DISTRICT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 • ru • 48 4/47 40 49 50 61 r 63 64 65 r66 67 6R 53 3100 TAXES 3101 ----/CURRENT YEAR SECURED 3103 /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 34Q0 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME -- - OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH- REVENUE EACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0004 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE' 06/14/89 • 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE X 357, 882. 00 - • - 32, 368. 74 - -- 346, 708. 50 27, 000. 00 1. 543. 89 11, 338. 76 384, 882.00 33, 912.63 358, 047.26 82, 000. 00 82, 000. 00 11, 236.81 .82, 985. 19 -11.236. 81--- 82, 985. 19 3900 OTHER REVENUE --- --3955 ---. - ..-. -----/OPERATING-TRANSFERS TRANSFERS IN -3.309.00 - O. 00--_.----- 3, 309. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3,309.00 0. 00 3.309.00 DEPT 0000 -- - - -- TOTALS - 470. 191. 00 - --45.149,-44------444,341. 45 FUND TOTAL /60.191.00 45, 149. 44 444, 341. 45 • 11, 173.50 96. 8 15, 661. 24 41. 9 26, 834. 74 93. 0 985.19- 101.2 985.19- 101.2 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 100.0 25.849.55 - 94.5 25, 849. 55 94. 5 • r Ct 4r, ri , 51 51 • • FINANCE-FA484' TIME' 20:00:23. FUND OB./ DESCRIPTION 110 PARKING FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)' FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3302 /COURT .OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3400 USE OF . 3401 .3407 3409 3413 OBJECT SUBTOTAL MONEY & PROPERTY /INTEREST INCOME /PARKING LOT RENTAL /LOT B /VPD LEASE 3800 CURRENT SERVICE 3842 3843 3844 3845 3846 3847 3848 3849 3850 OBJECT SUB TdTAL • 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 -3904--- 3955 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL FINES/PARKING CHARGES /PARKING METERS /PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL /DAILY PARKING PERMITS /VPD LOT PERMITS/DAILY - /VPD LOT PERMITS/MONTHLY /VALIDATION STAMPS /DRIVEWAY PERMITS /GUEST PERMITS /CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS -- /BUDGETED TRANSFERS IN TOTALS EST REV 1. 375. 000. 00 1, 375, 000. 00 33, 000. 00 15, 000. 00 22, 000. 00 65, 000. 00 135. 000. 00 580, 000. 00 185. 000. 00 2. 500. 00 7, 000. 00 10, 000. 00 15. 000. 00 250. 00 1. 000. 00 2. 000. 00 802. 750. 00 50. 00 50. 00 12, 249. 00 12, 349. 00 MONTHLY REV 115.744. 56 115. 744. 56 2. 309. 71 1. 392. 25 1.915.84 14. 506. 85 20. 124. 65 63. 798. 22 25, 313. 00 - 5. 00 1. 127. 81 1, 173. 00 3. 176. 19 137. 50 - 122. 00 120. 00 94, 972. 72 0. 00 0.00 ' O. 00 0. 00 YEAR TO DATE • PAGE 0005 DATE 06/14/89 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE • 1.269. 852. 08 . 105, 147. 92 • 92. 3 1. 269, 852. 018 105. 147. 92 92. 3 21, 163. 09 20. 914. 75 19, 158. 40 81. 187. 58 142. 423. 82 599.,523. 54 180. 193. 00 1, 000. 00 7, 523. 35 10. 317. 00 21, 079. 50 653. 50 . 846. 00 1,910.00 823. 045. 89 • 57. 56- ' 41. 00 12, 249. 00 • 12, 232. 44 2, 325, 099. 00 230, 841. 93 2, 247, 554. 23 2, 325, 099. 00 230. 841. 93 2. 247. 554. 23 11, 836. 91 5. 914. 75- 2.8.41.60 16. 187. 58- 7. 423. 82- 19. 523. 54- 4, 807. 00 1. 500. 00 523. 35- 317. 00- 6. 079. 50- 403. 50- 154. 00 90. 00 20. 295. 89- 107.56' 9. 00 0. 00 116. 56 64. 1 139. 4 87. 0 124. 9 105. 4 103. 3 97. 4 40. 0 107. 4 103. 1 140. 5 261. 4 84. 6 95. 5 102. 5 115. 1 82. 0 100. 0 99. 0 • 77. 544. 77 96. 6 77, 544. 77 96. 6 is t' tI • 8 ,( n r - r i, r • FINANCE-FA484' TIME 20:.00:23* FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 115 -STATE GAS TAX•FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 • -- CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ---- ------- REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 EST REV MONTHLY REV 3400 VSE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 25, 000. 00 3. 471.35 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 25, 000.•00 3, 471. 35 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE '•3501 /SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION 3502 /SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 3503 -/SECT 2107.5 ALLOCATION 3522 /TDA ARTICLE 3 (SB821) OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3900 GTHER REVENUE .3955 OPERAfI TRANSFERS IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 • FUND TOTAL 83, 593. 00 174, 848. 00 4, 000. 00 5. 196. 00 267, 637. 00 2. 862. 99 7. 200. 89 0. 00 0. 00 10. 063. 88 101. 829. 00 4. 961. 00 - - 101. 829. 00 4, 961. 00 -- TOTALS 394. 466. 00 18. 496. 23 - 394, 466. 00 YEAR TO DATE 25. 246. 09 25, 246. 09 68, 359. 61 144, 807. 25 4. 000. 00 5. 196. 00 222, 362. 86 96, 867. 00 • 96. 867. 00 344, 475. 95 - 18. 496. 23- -- 344, 475. 95 PAGE' 0006 DATE 06/14/89 91.0X OF. YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 7. • 246.09-- 100.9 246.09- 100.9 15. 233. 39 81.7 30.040.75 82.8 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 100. 0 45, 274. 14 83. 0 4. 962. 00 4. 962. 00 49. 990. 05 95. 1 95.1 - 87. 3 49. 990. 05 87. 3 • . 3 R r�- y •"I L •.3 A 24 '5 �s 4 27 r FINANCE-FA484 • TIME 20:'00:23 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY• 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 9600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3601 /COUNTY AID TO CITIES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 r'3.• 331 34 rn r•.4 39 ao r a, a; 43 f - -- to:: a, aC n a9P , • 51 r- 03 54 57 FUND TOTAL TOTALS -- CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 PAGE 0007 DATE 06/14/89 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE - UARANCIZED BALANCE 2, 000. 00 2. 000. 00 0.00 0.00 2. 000. 00 • 2, 000. 00 • 308.41 --2,360.95 360. 95- 118.0 308.41 2.360.95 360.95- 118.0 o: o0 0.00 0.00 0.00 308.41 • 2.360.95 308. 41 2, 360. 95 • • 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 0 360. 95- 118. 0 360. 95- 118. 0 • 18 r 27 • 3) 22 rH 3: r r le: I 4 2 r- 44 4! • 47 49 - e„ 54: 5/ . - INANCE-FA4134 ' TIME2000:23 • --------------------- CITY OF HERMOSA- BEACH-. -------- - REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 • FUND • .OBJ DESCRIPTION 125 PARK AND RECREATION -FACILITIES FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 • 3100 TAXES 3116 .OBJECT SUBTOTAL /PARK REC FACILITY TAX - EST REV 70, 000. 00 70, 000. 00 MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE . • • 3. 500. 00 3, 500. 00 • PAGE 0008 DATE 06/14/89 91. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE . UNREAL I ZD BALANCE • % • • : 1 40, 602. 00 40, 602. 00 • 29. 398. 00 58. 0 29. 398. 00 58.0 3400 .USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY • 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 33. 000. 00 5. 476. 54 36. 867. 24 3. 867. 24- 111. 7 3416 /OIL ROYALTIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 • OBJECT - SUB TOTAL - - - - - - -- - 33. 000. 00 -- - 5. 476. 54 -------36.867.24 3. 867. 24- 111.7 - 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3910 - - /PARK/RECREATION IN LIEU - - 175, 000. 00 -------6.534.00- 160, 083. 00 14. 917. 00 91. 4 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 175. 000. 00 6. 534. 00 160, 083. 00 14, 917. 00 91. 4 DEPT 0000 TOTALS -- FUND TOTAL • -a, 278, 000. 00 -- 15, 510. 54 -- 237, 552. 24 278, 000. 00 15, 510. 54 237, 552. 24 • • • • 40. 447. 76 85. 4 40, 447. 76 • 85. 4 7J r+rs 9 r" ,! 13 L e FINANCE-FA484 TIME 20:.00:23. FUND 0DJ DESCRIPTION 126 'JUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3120 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /UTILITY USER TAX - 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY _ r.„ '3401 /INTEREST INCOME 26, 000. 00 11 405. 38 '. OBJECT SUBTOTAL , 50, 341. 82 26, 000. 00 11, 405. 38 50, 341. 82 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3903 /CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT 0.00 0.00 200.00 3956 - -- -• /RESDL EQUITY TRSFR IN -- 481, 459. 00 --- 0. 00 481, 459. 00 • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 481, 459. 00 71 0. 00 481, 659. 00 DEPT 0000 - •- - - - -- TOTALS - 1, 285, 086. 00 - 85. 735. 81-- 1, 268, 172. 94 . • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0009 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 _ DATE 06/14/89 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE UALANCIZED BALANCE 777. 627. 00 777, 627. 00 74. 330. 43 74, 330. 43 736, 172. 12 736. 172. 12 4): 70 r:n FUND TOTAL 1, 285. 086. 00 85, 735. 81 1, 268, 172. 94 31 r .3: • e •.7 r r -- r.:1 41, 454. 88 41. 454. 88 24. 341. 82- 24. 341. 82- 200. 00- 0. 00 200. 00- 94. 6 94. 6 • 193. 6 193. 6 0. 0 100. 0 100. 0 --16. 913. 06 98. 6 16. 913. 06 98. 6 • 112 FINANCE—FA484 . L — TIME 20: 00: 23 J FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 127 6% UTILITY USER DEPARTMENT 0000, 12 r TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH--- — REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 EST REV MONTHLY REV PAGE 0010 1� DATE 06/14/89 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 3100 TAXES 3120 /UTILITY USER TAX - 1, 166, 440.•00 111, 495. 62 1, 104, 258. 16 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 166, 440. 00 111, 495. 62 1. 104. 258. 16 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY -. 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 3, 000. 00 1, 091. 87 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3, 000. 00 1, 091. 87 35 3J 7l r. 3'3 40 r 41 47 a7 41- 4s eaas e) e9 49 f 5t 57 rs3 ,A 57 571 • FUND TOTAL TOTALS 4, 680. 05 4.680. 05 1. 169. 440. 00 .112. 587. 49 1, 108, 938. 21 1, 169. 440. 00 112, 587. 49 1, 108, 938. 21 • 62, 181. 84 94. 6 62.181.84 94.6 1. 680. 05— 156. 0 1.680.65— 156.0 60, 501. 79 94. 8 60. 501. 79 94. 8 • . 4 "e. 5 ,7 „ ( 3401 • / INTEREST INCOME 1, 200. 00 24. 11 815. 17 384. 83 • 67. 9 r,,' 'OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 200. OO 24. 11 815. 17 384. 83 67. 9 L_ ,, . DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1, 200. 00 24. 11 - 81.5. 17 384. 83 67. 9 r,7 • v a r a,r rltl'(1•IU.7A b P,GM - - FINANCE—FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME 20:00:23 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89• DATE 06/14/89 • 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7. PAGE. 0011 i 130 REVENUE SHARING FUND•• ' DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF•MONEY & PROPERTY r FUND TOTAL 1, 200. 00 24. 11 815. 17 2,� 41, 27 1 z) • r 3Zr t) (-4, • • 384. 83 67. 9 a7 ao • • ev • SS r • 402 FINANCE-FA484 r. 7.1 u 'S • -CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH --------- TIME 20:00:23 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND). PAGE 0012 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 0644/89 i 91.0% OF'YEAR COMPLETE FUNDOBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE UNREALIZED ,. . BALANCE % s• 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 - - 3100 TAXES 3x17 /PROPOSITION A TRANSIT 189, 587. 00 - --- - 14, 607. 00 --- - -- -188, 288. 87 3121 SUBREGNL INCENTIVE FUNDS 36, 422. 00 0. 00 42, 870. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 226, 009. 00 14, 607. 00 231, 158. 87 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 16, 000. 00 2, 678. 50 17, 661. 30 1, bbl. 30- 110. 3 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 16, 000. 00 --- - -- 2. 678. 50---- -- 17, 661. 30 - -- 1, 661. 30- - 110. 3 1, 298. 13 6, 448. 00- 5. 149. 87- • 99. 3 117.7 102.2 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3852....... - . /FARES,- ESEA - ----- ------ _ _ _ . 0. 00 38;P4 /FARES, DIAL A RIDE0.00--- 0.00 3855 /BUS PASSES 8. 050. 00 0. 00 .51012. 74 3. 037. 26 62. 2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3, 500. 00 539. 00 5. 877. 00 2. 377. 00- 167. 9 _._. _._.. __.._ - 11, 550. 00 --- 539. 00- -- 1D.889. 74- 660.26 94.2 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS --IN • --------------_.- OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000- FUND'TOTAL 1, 106. 00 1, 106. 00 0. 00 1, 106. 00 1, 106. 00 254, 665. 00 - •- - 17, 824. 50 - -- 260, 815. 91 254, 665. 00 17, 824. 50 260, 815. 91 • 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 100. 0 6. 150. 91- 6. 150. 91- • • • 102. 4 102. 4 • i1 24 • [ FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME 20:00:2 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 PAGE 0013 DATE 06/14/89 91.07. OF - YEAR COMPLETE FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION UNREALIZED • EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 150 -GRANT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY &• PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME - 2.000.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2.000.00 829. 88 829. 88 4. 002. 44 4, 002. 44 2, 002. 44- 2, 002. 44- 200. 1 200. 1 3500'INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3526 /19-378 CLARK STADIUM 0. 00 0. 00 1, 932. 30 1. 932. 30- 0. 0 3527 3530 /19-857 COMMUNITY CENTER 0. 00 0. 00 910. 00 910. 60- 0. 0 - 3531 /AWNBOWLERS FA 0.00 4.00 476. 50 476. 50-0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /COMM CENTER REHAB • 0. 00 0. 00 1. 424. 00 1, 424. 00- 0. 0 - 0. 00 0. 00 4, 742. 80 4. 742. 80- 0. 0 3709 INTERGOVERNMENT/FEDERAL 3701 /FEDERAL AID URBAN 433, 200. 00 0. 00 O. 00 433, 200. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 433, 200. 00 - O. 00 0. 00 - 433. 200. 00 0. 0 • 87, 936. 00 - --- 6, 801. 00 -- - - -- 81. 141. 00 - 6. 795. 00 92. 2 87, 936. 00 6. 801. 00 81, 141. 00 6. 795. 00 92.2 DEPT 0000 - TOTALS ---- --•- - - 523. 136. 00 7, 630. 88 -- - 89. 886. 24 433. 249. 76 17. 1 a 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN ----- r+r. OBJECT SUBTOTAL . • r L.. r1 Yi .L 4,1 r 01 ,2 4.7 t• • 4a --- 0 4, t9 e F. a FUND TOTAL 523, 136. 00 7, 630. 88 89, 886. 24 433. 249. 76 17. 1 412J FINANCE-FA494 TIME 20:00:23 4 ..-- r 13 • FUND 013J DESCRIPTION 155 CROSSING GUARD FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3101 3103 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /CURRENT YEAR SECURED /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL -- _ C 3900 OTHER REVENUE 21 -. - 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS -IN-- ---- o;a OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT -0000 25 -7 TOTALS - n r29 3, • W r tl 42 • 044 ae ae 49 • 5r ra 53 r 5e GT :i 51 FUND TOTAL . CITY OF HERMOSA • BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 EST REV 73, 495. 00 5, 196. 00 78, 691. 00 800. 00 800. 00 MONTHLY REV 5, 963. 03 298. 22 6,261.25 YEAR TO DATE 69, 251. 28 2, 441. 83 71, 693. 11 377. 13 1, 654. 22 377. 13 -- -- 1.654.22 452. 00 .. - 452. 00 0. 00 - 452. 00 . 452. 00 79, 943. 00 - -- - - 6, 638. 38 -- -- - - 73, 799. 33 79, 943. 00 6, 638. 38 73, 799. 33 • PAGE' 0014 DATE 06/14/89 91. 07. OF, YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 7.. • 4, 243. 72 2, 754. 17 6, 997. 89 94. 2 46. 9 91. 1 • 854.22- 206.7 854.22- 206.7 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 100.0 • 6, 143. 67 92.3 - 6. 143. 67 92.3 • i0 • -. • 7 FINANCE-FA484 13 TIME 20:00:2a 4 4 r5 r�l9 ✓ : al [. 2+ 27 3 24 •:c red 7 - r 38 37 43 r 41 42 •,4 On 49 49 A,9 5, c7 r 53 575.1 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 160 SEWER FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ------ • REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND). PAGE 0015 i FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED .. EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7. • • 3400 USE OF MONEY &•PROPERTY • 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 82, 000.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 82, 000. 00 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3602 /BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANC 3,600.00 900.00 4, 297.45 697.45- 119.3 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3.600. 00 900. 00 4,297.45 .697.45,- 119. 3 3800. CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3828 3829 /SEWER CONNECTION FEE 25, 000.00. 1.244.02 ' 44, 057.68 • 19,057.68- 176.2 /SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 1.000.00-- -3.005.00-- - 3,990.00 2.990. 00- 399. 0 3832 /SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN 2.400.00 82.50 ' 1,7Q5.59 694.41 71.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 28. 400. 00 4.331.52 49, 753. 27 . - 21;353.27- 175. 1 13, 345. 00 13. 345. 00 76,383.74' 76, 383. 74 • • 5.616.26 5.616.26 93. 1 93. 1 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3904 /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 0.00 3906- /IN LIEU SEWER FEE - 0.00 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN • 803,481.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 803,481.00 DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL TOTALS 917, 481. 00 400.00- -.--- 66, 666. 00 66, 266. 00 84. 842. 52 917, 481. 00 84, 842. 52 400.00- 400.00 0.0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 747, 951. 45 • 55. 529. 55 93. 0 747, 551. 45 55, 929. 55 93. 0 877, 985.91 • 39,495.09 95.6 877, 985. 91 39. 495. 09 • 95. 6 • • • • 0 rx r` 5 6 13 7u x,L 6:3 xa xs n ze r x3 :A 31 32 33 34 �... x x 3, r- yl 39 ao ra, FINANCE-FA484 TIME 20: 00: 23 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3xJ'.04 -- /FORFEITED FUNDS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5t 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY .3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 TOTALS FUND TOTAL a CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 EST REV 0. 00 0. 00 20, 000. 00 20, 000. 00 20, 000. 00 20, 000. 00 MONTHLY REV 0. 00 - - 0. 00 .YEAR TO DATE 6. 142. 77 6, 142. 77 1. 563: 04 17, 499. 47 1, 563. 04 17, 499. 47 1, 563. 04 • 23. 642. 24 ar 1, 563. 04 23, 642. 24 • PAGE 0016 DATE 06/14/89 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 6,142.77- 6,142.77- 2; ,142.77- 6,142.77- 2; 50Q. 53 2, 500. 53 3, 642. 24- 1 0. 0 0. 0 87.4 87. 4 118. 2 3,642.24- 118.2 � s r":,1 L`! 1, t r ?3 :4 25 r r., 30 33 FINANCE—FA464 TIME 20:00:23 FUND OBJ • DESCRIPTION 180 FIRE 'PROTECTION FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY • 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT,SUBTOTAL 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3912 /FIRE FLOW FEE • 3955 /OPERATING TRANSFERS OBJECT. SUBTOTAL -. -- DEPT 0000 TOTALS 34 .___._ _.. _. ,u 3.5 41 e1 r 57 r u. 55 57 FUND TOTAL IN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 EST REV 6, 000. 00 6, 000. 00 124, 000. 00 59, 700. 00 183, 700. 00 189, 700. 00 MONTHLY REV 2, 158. 52 2, 158. 52 5, 707. 24 4, 167. 00 9, 874. 24 12, 032. 76 YEAR TO GATE . PAGE 0017 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE ti 9, 544. 993, 544. 99— 9, 544. 99 159. 0 3,•544:99— 159.0 • 177, 815. 09 55, 533. 00 • -. 2334 348. 09 ' 242, 893. 08 189, 700. 00 12, 032: 76 - - 242, 893. 08 • 53. 815. 09- 4, 167. 00 49, 648. 09- 143. 3 93.0. 127. 0 53, 193. 08— 128. 0 53, 193. 08— 128. 0 • 0 T r•s T r1s FINANCE-FA484 TIME 20:00:23 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 705 INSURANCE FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3900 OTHER REVENUE r ,; 3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL • 21 0 23 24 DEPT 0000 34 r'u 34 r• >r 3:. 41 r FUND TOTAL REPORT TOTALS a TOTALS CITY OF HERMOSA-BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)' FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 • PAGE 0018 ' . DATE 06/44/89 1 91.0%. OF YEAR COMPLETE EST REV MONTHLY REV .. YEAR TO DATE BALANCEZED X • • • • 55. 000. 00 4. 886. 96 --- =- 48. 747. 78 6. 252. 22 88. 6 55. 000. 00 4. 886. 96 48. 747. 78 6, 252. 22 89. 6 0. 00 0. 00 7, 440. 00 7. 440. 00- 0. 0 195, 597. 00 16, 157. 00 179, 439. 00 16. 158. 00 91. 7 195, 597. 00 16.157. 00- --- •- 186, 879. 00 8, 718. 00 95. 5 250. 597. 00 ' 21, 043. 96 235, 626. 78 14, 970. 22 94. 0 , r 250, 597. 00 21. 043. 96•--- - 235. 626. 78 14, 970. 22 94. 0 17, 655, 842. 00 1. 507, 307. 46 16. 800, 406. 14' 855, 435. 86 95. 1 • • • • 3 5 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 o FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. r , ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE o r 001 GENERAL FUND ,9 - 0000 DEPT: r„• ,z 1401 GASOLINE INVENTORY 0.00 0.00 000 13OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 0.00 . O. 00 0.00 0. 0 011%14r - O. 00 O. 00 - - - ---- 0. Ci0 O. 00 0. 0 15 ,, DIVISION TOTAL - 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 O. 00 0.O r.„ ,o DEPARTMENT TOTAL 0.00 0.00 U. 00 0.00 0.00 0.0 c.,; 1101 CITY COUNCIL DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 21 zzt-_-_-------- -4100 PERSONAL -SERVICES - - e73 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 20, 731. 00 1, 909. 50 19, 758. 43 O. 00 ze 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 518.00 O. 00 "' 972. 57 95.3 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN O. 00 O. 00 . 518. 00 0. 0 25 -- 818.00 - 114.06 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 1, 928. 84 - - O. OO 1. 110. 84- 235. 7 z5 v 17, 700. 00 1, 200. 00 13, 281. 50 O. 00 lr t7 [I-- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 39, 767. 00 3, 223. 56 34. 968. 77 4. 418. 50 75. 0 zo O. 00 4, 798. 23 87. 9 r. 29 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 30 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 22. 500. 00 O. 00 24, 218. 76 3; OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 22, 500. 00 0. 00 1. 718. 76- 107. 6 r�` 3: 0. 00 - 24, 218. 76 • 0. 00 1, 718. 76- 107. 6 :, , 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ,, 4304 TELEPHONE 600.00 15.63 147.71 0.00 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 9, 500. 00 573. 78 7, 440. 83 X452. 29 24. 6 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4, 559. 00 O. 00 O. 00 2, 2059.36. 17 78. 3 37 -4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE- ---------- • 4, 795. 00 0.. 00 236. 00- 105. 1 33 5, 000. 00 22. 50 -- - 2. 148. 11 -- 0. 00 2, 851. 89 42. 9 4319 SPECIAL EVENTS 1, 000. 00 26. 97 414. 22 O. 00 33 4397 2. 5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS 1, 590. 00- 585. 41. 4 O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 590. 00- 0. 0 .0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL -- - - - -- 19, 069. 00 638. 88 -- -- 14, 945: 87 -- - - 0. 00 e-. 4, 123. 13 78. 3 -CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 • PAGE 0001 DATE 06/14/89 91.0`/. OF YEAR COMPLETE • .9 .9 • SO 5, 57 r 53 s. 55 /.'`56 57 69 L 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS -THAN -$500-- ---- 2, 500. 00 - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2.500.00 DIVISION TOTAL 83, 836. 00 1102 BILTMORE COMM DEPT -LEGISLATIVE --- 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY-- - OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 370; 00 0. 00------24500:- 00--- 0. 00 2, 500. 00 3,862.44 76, 633. 40 0.00 370. 00 0. 00 136. 50-- 136. 50 -- 0. 00 0.'00 O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 1 00 . 0 0. 00 1 00 . 0 7, 202. 60 91. 4 233. 50 36. 8 233. 50 36. 8 • r :i FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 5 e eN 9 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 9 r 17 1a 21 L 22 •:7 2a i •a� 2a r 23 30 31r- r. 1r i 32 I • 33 1 r 35 1 36 37 r 36 3B r4, 32 a9 .c 1 40 61 62 (-53 60 I Al 57 55 1102 BILTMORE COMM DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES - 4323 PUBLIC NOTICING OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION 1121 CITY CLERK CITY OF-HERMOSA-BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION LEGISLATIVE 1, 120. 00 510. 00 1, 630. 00 TOTAL 2, 000. 00 DEPT: - - 4100 PERSONAL -SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4323 PUBLIC NOTICING 4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 -- OBJECT SUBTOTAL - - DIVISION TOTAL - 1122 ELECTIONS 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY LEGISLATIVE 29, 388. 00 0. 00 735. 00 735. 00 12, 000. 00 42, 858. 00 300. 00 300. 00 440. 00 2, 000. 00 220. 00 400. 00 550. 00 8, 000. 00 1, 349. 00- 10, 261. 00 200. 00 200. 00 53, 619. 00 DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 2, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 259. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 3, 259. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 80 45. 25 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 47. 05 0. 00 0. 00 0: 00 184. 50 184. 50 321. 00 23, 413. 46 59. 22 906. 63 0. 00 13, 000. 00 37, 379. 31 248. 00 248. 00 • 442. 15 1, 542. 18 175. 00 465. 00 123. 00 - 6, 981. 70 0. 00 9, 729. 03 0. 00 0. 00 3, 306. 05 -- - 47, 356. 34 0. 00 81. 68 ENCUMBRANCE - -0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 04 0. 00 0. Q0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 20. 07 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 20. 97 0-00- 0. 00 20. 07 0. 00 PAGE 0002 DATE 06/.14/89 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNENC BALANCE 1, 120. 00 325. 50 1, 445. 50 1, 679. 00 5, 974. 54 59. 22- 171. 63- 735. 00 1. 000. 00- 5, 478. 69 O. 0 36. 1 11.3 16. 0 79. 6 0. 0 123. 3 0. 0 108. 3 87. 2 52. 00 82. 6 .52.00 82.6 2. 15- 437. 75 45. 00 • 65. 00- 421. 00 1,018.30 1, 349. Q0- 511. 90 200.' 00 200. 00 100. 4 78. 1 79. 5 116. 2 22. 3 87. 2 0. 0 95. 0 0. 0 0. 0 6,242.59 88. 3 1, 918. 32 4. 0 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 a r.5 7' rel 'I. FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND r:oj 21 ao31 r az 34 - r :5 39 r38 51 57 ‚-'53 5e 55 58 57 59 r�.• 1122 ELECTIONS 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4211 CONTRACT SERVICE/PREV YR OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES- ---- 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 2, 000. 00 10, 900. 00 0. 00 10, 900. 00 100. 00 500. 00 - 400. 00 200. 00 353. 00- 847. 00 13, 747. 00 1131 CITY ATTORNEY ----DEPT:- LEGISLATIVE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE - 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1132 CITY PROSECUTOR 138, 487. 00 3, 000. 00 141, 487. 00 2, 400. 00 1, 650. 00 3, 526. 00- 524. 00 142, 011. 00 DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL . • 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE• 25, 440. 00 25, 440. 00 14, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 41. 02 2. 10 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 43. 12 43. 12 6, 868. 69 233. 43 7, 102. 12 235. 55 185. 73 0. 00 421. 28 7, 523. 40 2, 120. 00 2, 120. 00 0. 00 PAGE 0003 DATE 06/14/89 91.07.. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 81. 68 0. 00 • 1, 918. 32 4. 0 12, 786. 90 - - 8, 630. 76 21, 417. 66 41. 02 539. 93 287. 00 0. 00 0. 00 867. 95 22, 367. 29 90, 923. 49 821.25 91.744. 74 2, 263. 36 - 1,221. 14 0. 00 3, 484. 50 95, 229. 24 23, 320. 00 23, 320. 00 1,200.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 . 0. 00 0. 00 • 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 1, 886. 90- 117. 3 8, 630. 76- 0. 0 10, 517. 66- 196. 4 58. 98 41. 0 39. 93- 107. 9 113. 00 71. 7 • 200. 00 0. 0 353. 00- 0. 0 20. 95- 102. 4 8, 620. 29- • 162. 7 47, 563. 51 65. 6 2, 178. 75 27. 3 49, 742.- 26 64. 8 136. 64 94. 3 . 428. 86 74. 0 3, 526. 00 0. 0 2, 960..50- - 664. 9 . 46, 781. 76 67. 0 2, 120. 00 2. 120. 00 12, B00: 00 • 91. 6 91. 6 8. 5 ry •9 .rz L .3 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 25E 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME �''� 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF' 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF'HERMOSA•BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 • • • PAGE 0004 DATE .06/14/89 91.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 1132 CITY PROSECUTOR DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 14, 000. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4397 2.5/. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL • 986. 00- 986. 00- DIVISION TOTAL 38, 454. 00 -1141--CITY TREASURER DEPT:- LEG ISLAT IVE-- es3) 42 431 . " . 47 49 4) r- ev5152, 1 57 w 6s r-50 67 r 69 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE -- 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING -- 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1201 CITY MANAGER 11, 331. 00 1, 000. 00 356. 00 356. 00 9, 000. 00 22, 043. 00 5, 260. 00 5, 260. 00 - 700: 00 1, 000. 00 110. 00 250. 00 500. 00 716. 00- 1, 844. 00 29, 147. 00 362, 814. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 95,525.00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 2,350.00 0. 00 - -- ---- -1. 200: 00 - 0. 00 - 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2,120.00 24.520.00 1. 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 750. 00 1, 750. 00 0. 00 0. 00 57. 03 85. 32 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 142. 35 1, 892. 35 18, 747. 36 8, 503. 50 0. 00 10. 331. 00- 118. 56 0. 00 0.00 8, 250. 00 18, 699. 56 1. 351. 90 1, 351. 90 541. 44 1, 501. 26 155. 00 -- 42.61 0. 00 0. 00 2. 240. 31 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 22, 291. 77 0. 00 288, 719. 04 20. 07 88. 951. 16 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 • 12, 800. 00 8. 5 986. 00- 986. 00- 0.0' 0. 0 13. 934. 00 63. 7 1. 000. 00 91. 1 881. 44 11. 8 356. 00 0. 0 356. 00 0. 0 750. 00 91. 6 3, 343. 44 84. 8 3, 908. 10 25. 7 3. 908. 10 25. 7 158. 515 - 77. 3 501. 26- 150. 1 45. 00- 140. 9 207. 39 17. 0 500..00 0.0 716. 00- 0. 0 396. 31- 121. 4 6, 855•..23, ' 76. 4 74, 074. 89 79. 5 6, 573. 84 • 93. 1 2, 350. 00 0. 0 a • '.• FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 3 4 [ - 51 57 - 58 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1201 CITY MANAGER 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPR I AT ION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATER/ALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS- - OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1202 FINANCE ADMIN --DEPT: 2,350. 00 3. 640. 00 103. 865. 00 20. 300. 00 - 20.300. 00 lt 000.00 1, 500. 00 350. 00 125. 00 1,062. 00 3. 322. 00 2. 900. 00 3,001. 00- 7. 258. 00 0.00 0.00 7.621. 00 7.621. 00 139. 044. 00 MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERV ICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 174, 062. 00 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 2, 124. 00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4, 045. 00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 1. 000. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 185, 276. 00 .4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ' 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 64 483. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 113. 89 302. 75 et 920. 14 1.051. 50 1.051. 50 2. 133.87 3,471. 29 94. 556. 32 14, 637: 95 - 14,-637. 95 48. 361-- 87. 00 12. 77 0.00 0.00 0.00 24. 50 0.00 172. 63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10, 144. 27 14, 395. 44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14, 395. 44 0.00 I t 070. 11 187. 34 4.00 1 e 061. 87 227. 63 -1. 869. 00 0. 00 4, 925. 13 186.38 186.38 • 7.620. 66-- 7, 620. 66 121, 926. 44 -157.435.33 2. 595. 71 0.00 4.435. 01 -- - 0.00 164, 466. 05 21,70. 43 PAGE 0005 DATE 06/14/89 91. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 O. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. Oa 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.* 00. 0.00 0. 00. 0.00 0.00 0.00 • • 216. 13 168. 71 9, 308. 68 5. 662, 05 5. 662. 05 494. 82 429. 89 162. 66 121. 00 0. 13 3, 094. 37 1 e 031. 00 3.001. 00- 2, 332. 87 18.6. '38- 186. 38- 0.34 0.34 . 17, 117. 56 90. 8 95. 3 91. 0 72. 1 72. 1 50. 5 71. 3 53. 5 3.2 99. 9 6.8 64. 4 0.0 67. 8 0. 0 0.0 99. 9 99. 9 87. 6 16, 626. (27 90.4 471.71- 122.2 4; 045. 00 0.0 390.01- 109.6 lo 000. 00 0.0 20. 809. 95 88. 7 • 42.722 57 • 33. 7 '- 5 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR I'` B e 001 +o r+� ,0 {•m z, t z5 27 35 n ''a+ 42 y• mr 145. 47 50 5: ` [, V .se 57 M 00 GENERAL FUND 1202 FINANCE ADMIN 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING - . __- 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS --- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 - 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH- --- -- - EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION MGMT/SUPPORT 64, 483.-00 1, 034. 00 9, 938. 00 215. 00 2, 702. 00 1, 788. 00 5, 143. 00- -- -10, 534. 00 500. 00 1. 500. 00 2, 000.00 DIVISION TOTAL 262, 293. 00 1203 PERSONNEL DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4320 MEDICAL EXAMS 4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 36, 780. 00 882. 00 882. 00 3, 640. 00 42, 184. 00 22, 063. 00 12. 800. 00 34. 863. 00 900. 00 4, 000. 00 495. 00 2, 870. 00 1, 500. 00 21, 800. 00 2, 288. 00- 29, 277. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 174. 82 693. 58 0. 00 143. 95 0. 00 0. 00 1, 012. 35 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 15, 407. 79 3, 537. 00 0. 00 0. 00 302. 75 3, 839. 75 1,915.61 988. 95 2, 904. 56 83. 62 267. 74 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1 r 375. 00 0. 00 1, 726. 36 21.-760. 43 1,572.14 8, 721. 04 225. 00 1, 580. 06 -- 670. 19 0. 00 12, 768. 43 0. 00 -- 0. 00 0. 00 198, 994. 91 33;869. 54 0. 00 1, 684. 76 3. 471. 29 39, 025. 59 27, 326. 48 16, 020. 50 43, 346. 98 927. 12 5, 000. 89 568. 00 2.117.05 634. 73 - 12, 010. 10 0.00 21. 257. 89 ENCUMBRANCE • -0. 00 - 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 'b. 00 - 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 938. 20 0. 00 1, 938. 20 0. 00 22. 90 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 22. 90 PAGE 0006 DATE 06/14/89 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE • UNENC BALANCE 42, 722. 57 538. 14- 1,216.96 10. 00- •1, 121. 94 1, 117. 81 5, 143. 00- 2, 234. 43- 500. 00 1, 500. 00 2, 000. 00 63, 298. 09 33. 7 152. 0 87. 7 104. 6 58. 4 37. 4 0. 0 121. 2 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 75. 8 2, 910. 46 92. 0 882. 00 0. 0 802. 76- 191. 0 .168. 71 95. 3 3, 158. 41 92. 5 7, 201. 68- .3, 220. 50- 10, 422. 18- 132. 6 125. 1 129. 8 27. 12- 103. 0 1, 023. 79- 125. 5 73. 00- 114. 7 752. 95 73. 7 865.27 42. 3 9, 789. 90 55. 0 2, 288. 00- 0. 0 7. 996. 21 72. 6 "1 [-• • • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1203 PERSONNEL - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ---- --- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION DEPT:- MGMT/SUPPORT 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN *500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1205 CABLE TV 760. 00 1, 256. 00 2, 016. 00 108, 340. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES - 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1206 DATA PROCESSING 22, 804. 00 0. 00 556. 00 556. 00 1,820.00 25, 736. 00 1. 000. 00 - 1. 000. 00 600. 00 1. 000. 00 510. 00 -- 250. 00 705. 00 781. 00- - - 2, 284. 00 2, 000.00 2, 000. 00 31, 020. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES - 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 71, 091. 00 500. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 939. 32 1.076.72 2. 016. 04 10. 486. 71 1. 898. 40 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 126. 00 2, 024. 40 0.00 0.00 11. 81 0. 00 -0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00- 11. 81 0.00 0.00 2,036.21 5, 975. 78 0. 00 1, 054. 24 1, 076. 72 2, 130. 96 105, 761.42 21, 438. 10 10. 44 0. 00 73. 83 1. 776.25 23, 298. 62 1, 500. 00- 1. 500. 00- 518. 00 0. 00 235. 00 282. 00 397. 78 - -- 0. 00 1. 432. 78 0.00 0.00 23, 231. 40 67, 257. 60 277. 34 PAGE ' 0007 ' DATE 06/14/89 91.07. OF.YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 961. 10 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 294.24- 138.7 179. 28 85. 7 114.96- 105.7 617.48 99.4 1.365. 90 10.44- 556.00 0.44- 556.00 482. 17 43. 75 2,437.38 94. 0 0.0 0. 0 13. 2 97. 5 90. 5 0. 00 2, 500. 00 150. 0 0. 00 • 2, 500. 00. 150. 0 0.00 82.00 86.3 0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0 0.00 275.00 46.0 0.00 32.00- 112.8 0.00 307. 22. 56.4 0. 00 781. 00- . 0. 0 0.00 851.22 62.7 0. 00 2, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 " 2, 000. 00 0. 0 • 7, 789. 60 74. 8 • 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,833.40" 022.66 94. 6 55.4 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR CITY OF--HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION r,;i 001 GENERAL FUND 61- -- 1206 DATA PROCESSING - DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 11 eN,: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. • PAGE 0008 DATE 06/14/89 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE • ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE ,a! - - 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF - 1, 720. 00 - - O. 00 O. 00 O. 00• �r,,,s 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1, 720. 00 O. 00 73. 83 O. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 75, 031. 00 5, 975. 78 67, 608. 77 O. 00 r,,, 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ,t: 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 93, 000. 00 9, 195. 64 65. 709.'70 '19, 283. 30 �- OBJECT SUBTOTAL -- -- 93, 000. 00 --- 9, 195. 64 65, 709. 70 19, 283. 30 41Vi 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER rz�- ------4304 TELEPHONE -------- - 3, 000: 00 - -- 244. 48- -- ------2, 462.09-_-_ -- - - - O. 00 .'a 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 10. 000. 00 160. 14 7, 573. 16 30. 89 • 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 3, 000. 00 124. 61 1, 936. 78 '"O. 00 Z; 4315 MEMBERSHIP 670.00 0.00 •400.00 - 0.00 4316 TRAINING 2, 000. 00 O. 00 843. 10 0. 00 �ZV 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 850.00 2.46- 732.08 0.00. r ._- - 4397 2. 5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS 5, 226. 00- - 0. 00 - O. 00 O. 00 rr OBJECT SUBTOTAL 14, 294. 00 526. 77 13, 947. 21 30. 89 :0 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 0. 00 400. 00 729. 25 767. 08 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 14, 330. 00 0. 00 6, 499. 90 2, 862. 08 LLL OBJECT SUBTOTAL 14, 330. 00 400. 00 7, 229. 15 3, 629. 16 f"^ as as a, ----- -- DIVISION TOTAL - 196, 655. 00 16. 098. 19 - - 154, 494. 83 22, 943. 35 1207 BUS LICENSE DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT x.51 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES ,= 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 78, 809. 00 3. 822. 26 58, 022. 36 as r--- - 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500. 00 0. 00 125. 70 .'1 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 1.835.00 0.00 9,601.79 as i 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1, 835. 00 0. 00 505.23 45 •- 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 3, 306. 00 0. 00 3, 305. 50 0a7 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 86, 285. 00 3, 822. 26 71. 560. 58 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES <0! 00'°!4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 729.00 0.00 26.70 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 300.00 0.00 115.85 e, L-- OBJECT SUBTOTAL -- 1, 029. 00 - 0. 00 - 142. 55 s: r53 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER - w --- 4304 TELEPHONE - 600. 00 - 44. 97 -- -- - --- 497. 01 466 5765 -------- _.. _ 55. 0. 00 0.00 0. 60 0. 00 0. 00 0.'00 • 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 720. 00 1, 646. 17 7, 422. 23 0.0 4. 2 90. 1 8, 007.00 91. 3 8, 007 00 91. 3 537. 91 2. 395. 95 1, 063. 22 270. 00 1, 156. 90 117. 92 5, 226. 00- 315. 90 1, 496. 33- 4, 968. a2 3,471.69 82. 0 76. 0 64. 5 59. 7 42. 1 86. 1 O. 0 97. 7 0. 0 65. 3 75. 7 19, 216. 82 90. 2 20, 786. 64 374. 30 7, 766. 79- • 1, 329. 77 0..5.0 14, 724. 42 702. 30 184. 15 886. 45 73. 6 25. 1 523. 2 27. 5 99. 9 82. 9 3. 6 38. 6 13. 8 102: 99 82. 8 A • • • • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 A 25j �L 27 -_ 2s . 3') f5'32 33 f 3' 38 37 r ._ r�L 39 44.43 45 52 r 53 50 55 58 57 GENERAL FUND 1207 BUS LICENSE DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE --4397 2.5. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT --- 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1208 GEN APPROP DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES --- 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT-- 5401 QUIPMENT-- 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION MGMT/SUPPORT 3, 200. 00 - 350. 00 0. 00 50. 00 500. 00 400. 00 2, 475. 00- 2, 625. 00 12, 000. 00 12. 000. 00 101, 939. 00 MGMT/SUPPORT 35, 254. 00 0. 00 1, 022. 00 1, 022. 00 37, 298. 00 26. 749. 00 26, 749. 00 2. 572. 00 0. 00 2, 075. 00- 497. 00 0. 00 760. 00 3. 877. 00 41637. 00 18. 030. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 164. 64 12. 40 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 222. 01 10, 834. 25 10, 834. 25 14, 878. 52 1,814.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1,814.00 1, 283. 01 1. 283. 01 0.00 2. 292. 63- 0. 00 2, 292. 63- 0. 00 2, 049. 90 1. 076. 72 3, 126. 62 1. 502. 96 2, 878. 46-- 149. 05 0. 00 40. 00 421..00 0. 00 0.00- - 3, 985. 52 10, 834. 25 10, 834. 25 86. 522. 90 19, 002. 19 33. 33 0. 00 0. 00 19, 035. 52 19, 165. 17 19, 165. 17 2. 571. 49 42, 388. 30- 4. 00 39. 816. 81- 0. 00 2. 220. 20 1, 076. 72 3, 296. 92 16, 524. 04 -- PAGE 0009 DATE 06/14/89 , 91. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 0. 00* 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ,..0. 00 0. 00 0. 00' 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 .0.00 0. 00 321. 54 200. 95 0. 00 10. 00 79. 00 400.00 2. 475. 00- 1, 360. 52- 1, 165. 75 1, 165. 75 15, 416. 10 89. 9 42. 5 0. 0 80. 0 84. 2 0. 0 0. 0 151. 8 90. 2 90. 2 84. 8 16, 251. 81 53. 9 33. 33- 0. 0 1, 022. 00 0. 0 1. 022. 00 0. 0 18, 262. 48 51. 0 0. 00 - 7, 583.83 71. 6 0. 00 7, 583. 83 71. 6 0. 00 0. d1 99. 9 0. b0 42, 388. 30 0. 0 0. 00 ' 2, 075. 00- 0. 0 0..00. 40, 313:81 8011. 4 0.00.• 0.00 0.0 0.00 1.460.20- 292. 1 0. 00 2. 800. 28 27. 7 0. 00 1, 340. 08 71. 0. 00 1, 505. 96 91. 6 • ! r21L 22 ,71 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL r 32 1 39 �•41 43 44 • DIVISION TOTAL 1212 EMP BENEFITS 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL - - CITY OF HERMOSA -BEACH---------.-- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION 18, 030. 00 87, 211. 00 - DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS --- OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1213 RETIREMENT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4180 RETIREMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 473, 393. 00 - 473, 393. 00 -- --- 10, 935. 00 10. 935. 00- 462, 458. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1214 PROSP EXP DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4322 UNCLASSIFIED ; 4397 2. 5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 40 43 51 53 5- - 53 54 55 r- 55 57 64 69 DIVISION TOTAL 994, 689. 00 994, 689. 00 23, 534. 00- 23, 534. 00- 971, 155. 00 MGMT/SUPPORT 31, 881. 00 10, 000. 00- 21, 881. 00 21,881.00 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4398 RESDL EQUITY TRSFR OUT 481,459.00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 1,502.96 5,433.96 40, 136. 62 40, 136. 62 0. 00 -- 0. 00 40, 136. 62 80, 276. 32 80, 276. 32 0. 00 0.00 80, 276. 32 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 16, 524. 04 18, 204. 84 416, 282.60 416,282.-60-- 0. 00 416, 282. 60 764, 078. 20 764, 078. 20 0. 00 0.00 764, 078. 20 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 481, 459. 00 PAGE 0010 DATE 06/14/89 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00' 1, 505. 96 91. 6 0. Oft • 69. 006. 16 20. 8 0. 00 57, .110. 40 07. 9 0. 00 • 57, 110: 40 87. 9 --- 0. 00 „4 0. 00 0. 00 . 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10, 935. 00- 0. 0 10, 935. 00- 0. 0 46, 175. 40 90. 0 230, 610. 80 230, 610. 80 • 23, 534. 00- 23, 534. 00- 76. 8 76. 8 0. 0 0. 0 0. 00 207, 076. 80 78. 6 0. QO 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00, 0. 00 31, 881. 60 10, 000. 00- 21,881.00 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 21, 881. 00 0. 0 0. 00 100. 0 s FINANCE-FA454 J 1 _ TIME 19:16:39 41 )44 �4t.. 4Jl f48 i60 bt u 6' 88 .7 OS 99 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER - - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 • PAGE 0011 DATE 06/14/89 .91.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 253, 494. 00 734, 953. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 734, 953. 00 18, 457. 00 716, 495. 00 0. 00 18, 458. 00 97, q DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3, 116, 949: 00 213, 355. 59 - 2,-605, 992. 54 . - - 24, 904. 45 486, 052. 01 84. 4 2101 POLICE DEPT: POLICE 18, 457. 00 18, 457. 00 235, 036. 00 0. 00 716, 495. 00 0. 00 18, 458. 00 18, 458: 00 92. 7 97.4 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 4109 COURT TIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN - - 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4114 POLICE RESERVES 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4118 FIELD TRAINING OFFICER 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4301 DAMAGE SETTLEMENTS 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC 363, 729. 00 1, 440, 939. 00 - 18, 480. 00 10, 200. 00 115, 000. 00 20, 500. 00 44, 031. 00 - - 44, 031. 00 - 17, 800. 00 7, 500. 00 9, 318. 00 5, 500. 00 28, 050. 00 2, 125, 078. 00 46, 524. 00 127, 223. 00 173, 747. 00 5, 000. 00 20.000.00 26, 500. 00 6, 454. 00 1, 500. 00 6, 000. 00 17, 500. 00 21,000. 00 17, 500. 00 7, 750. 00 35, 064. 83 118, 532. 44 1, 380. 00 1, 034. 83 7, 790. 51 847. 61 0. 00 4. 121. 90 3, 841. 46 431. 50 697. 76 754. 82 2, 464. 11 176, 961. 77 1, 179. 60 2, 418. 50 3, 598. 10 O. 00 2, 578. 30 3, 224. 76 887. 92 351. 25 1, 196. 83 1. 733. 73 921. 39 466. 75 21. 75- 313, 522. 96 - 1, 307, 005. 94 18, 135. 00 7, 076. 89 81, 090. 24 11, 632. 18 9, 223. 43 57, 790. 45- 30, 877. 71 7, 749. 25 6, 465. 64 4, 043. 06 30, 728. 67 1, 885. 341. 42 -- 27.000. 69 126, 305. 13 153, 305. 82 0. 00 23, 000. 97 32, 734. 59 7, 124. 18 2, 118. 23 7, 269. 49 15, 723. 32 20, 432. 28 15, 522. 51 3, 214. 37 0.00 - 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 910. 94 2, 910. 94 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 50b. 00 1, 424. 52 481. 24 134. 19 166. 62 0. 00 2. 813. 37 0. 00 0. 00 50, 206. 04 86. 1 133, 933. 06 90. 7 345. 00 98. 1 3, 123. 11 69. 3 33, 909. 76 70. 5 8, 867. 82 56. 7 • 34, 807. 57 20. 9 13, 759. 45- 131. 2 13, 077. 71- 173. 4 249.25- 103.3 2, 852. 36 69. 3 1, 456. 94 73. 5 5, 589. b1-'. 119. 9 236, 825. 64 . , 88. 8 19, 523. 31 917.137 20, 441. 18 , 5, 000. 00 3, 500. 97- 7, 659. 11- 1, 151. 42- 752. 42- 1, 436. 11- 1, 776. 68 '2, 245.65•- 1,977.49• 4, 535. 63 58. 0 99. 2 88. 2 0. 0 117. 5 128. 9 117. 8 150. 1 • 123. 9 • . 89. 8 110. 6 88. 7 41. 4 oda rl r' -A - u • z, I u 23 24 38 97 te- r r - i, FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH-------- EXPENDITURE EACH------ EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0012 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION 2101 POLICE - DEPT: POLICE 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 - -- 5403 VEHICLES -- - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2201 FIRE 1. 535. 00 5, 800. 00 1. 500. 00 58, 258. 00- 79, 781. 00 4, 074. 00 24. 878. 00 15, 194. 00 44, 146. 00 197, 045. 00 197. 045. 00 2, 619. 797. 00 2. 619. 797. 00 DEPT: FIRE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 1. 022. 16 0. 00 0. 00 12. 361. 34 0. 00 0. 00. 0. 00 0. 00 4. 284. 66 4. 284. 66 1. 143.93 8, 201. 98 1. 243. 71 0. 00 137. 729. 56 1. 587. 92 23. 266. 90 -- - - 7. 691. 94-- 32, 546. 76 277. 587. 49 277, 587. 49 197, 205. 87 2, 486. 511. 05 197, 205. 87 2. 486, 511. 05 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 70. 00 0. 00 0. 00 5. 589. 94 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00• • 391. 07 2. 471. 98- 256. 29 58. 258. 00- 63. 538. 50- 2. 486. 08 1, 611. 10 7. 502. 06 11, 599. 24 80. 542. 49- 80. 542. 49- 74. 5 142. 6 82. 9 0.0 179. 6 38. 9 93. 5 50. 6 73. 7 140. 8 140. 8 8, 500. 88 124. 785. 07 95. 2 8. 500. 88 • 124, 785. 07 95. 2 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC - 32, 512. 00 2, 733. 50 31. 226. 64 0. 00 1, 285. 36 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 789, 201. 00 66, 448. 26 701, 932. 01 0. 00 87. 268. 99 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME - 96, 000. 00 5. 709. 24 80, 132. 51 0. 00 15, 867. 49 4108 FLSA OVERTIME 55. 000. 00 3, 124. 59 •-- 46, 934. 60 0. 00 8. 065. 40 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 20, 808. 00 0. 00 2. 278. 87 0. 00 18, 529. 13 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 20. 908. 00 0. 00 5, 174. 22 0. 00 15, 633.78 4187 UNIFORMS 11, 100. 00 351. 45 6, 871. 19 407. 50 3. 821. a1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 025. 429. 00 78, 367. 04 874, 550. 04 407. 50 150. 471. 46 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES _ 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 1.000.00 0.00 258.87 0.00 741. 13 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 31. 302. 00 0. 00 26, 163. 00 0. 00 5. 139. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 32, 302. 00 0. 00 - - 26. 421. 87 0. 00. • 5. 880. 13 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 4.000. 00 2, 000. 00 750. 00 203. 29 144. 00 0. 00 3, 316. 18 2, 814. 36 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 68?. 82 814, 36- 750. 00 96. 0 88. 9 83. 4 85. 3 10. 9 24. 8 65. 5 85. 3 25. 8 83. 5 81. 7 82. 9 140. 7 0. 0 • r• 5 e. r17 2) L. 22 35 30 L. FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 2201 FIRE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION DEPT: FIRE 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE - 4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS--- OBJECT SUBTOTAL - - 5400 EQUIPMENT - - 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN *500 -- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2401 ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT: C 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES - 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL • 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER • 4304 TELEPHONE• 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES - 7. 200. 00 3, 600. 00 4, 000. 00 650. 00 3, 000. 00 750. 00 - 28,488. 00- 2. 538. 00- 275. 00 10. 100. 00 10, 375. 00 34, 838. 00 34, 838. 00 1, 100. 406. 00 1, 100, 406. 00 ANIMAL REGULTN 78, 518. 00 1, 000. 00 1, 925. 00 1,925.00 1, 000. 00 300. 00 84, 668. 00 1,800.00 5. 000. 00 6. 800. 00 400. 00 1, 800. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 416. 35 175. 01 947. 84 0. 00 978. 15 0. 00 0.00 - 2. 864. 64 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 47. 62 47. 62 81, 279. 30 81, 279. 30 6, 404. 26 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 77. 90 18. 76 6, 500. 92 0. 00 276. 32 276. 32 43. 70 223. 15 7, 160. 35 2,281. 79 2,612.61 260. 75 2, 263.•49 411. 28 0. 00 21. 120. 81 PAGE 0013 DATE 06/14/89 91. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. • 79. 88 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 79. 88 621. 91 1933. 13 5, 886. 51 3, 310. 02 6, 508. 42 -- --- - 3, 443. 15 7, 469. 49 7, 469. 49 936. 070. 63 936, 070. 63 72. 388. 27 461: 03 635. 55 503. 77 - 786.29 - 282. 18 75. 057. 09 487. 07 2, 910. 58 - 3, 397. 65 443. 17 1, 027. 07 40. 23- 1,318.21 1, 387. 39 389. 25 736. 51 338'72 28, 488. 00- 23, 738. 69- 480. 04- 903. 47 423. 43 0. 00 27, 368. 51 0. 00 27, 368. 51 3, 930. 53 • 160, 404. 84 3. 930. 53 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. QO 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00. 0.00 • 0. 00 0. 00 639. 00 160, 404. 84 6, 129. 73 538. 97 1, 289. 45 1, 421. 2,3 213. 71 17.82 9, 610. 91 1, 312. 93 2, 089. 42 3. 402. 35 • 43: 17- 133. 93 100. 5 63. 3 65. 3 40. 1 75. 4 54. 8 0. 0 835. 3 274. 5 91. 0 95. 9 • 21. 4 21. 4 85. 4 85. 4 92. 1 46. 1 33. 0 26. 1 78. 6 94. 0 88. 6 27. 0 58. 2 49. 9 110. 7 92. 5 010. s FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19: 16: 39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR mel 001 GENERAL FUND . 10 12 CITY OF--HERMOSA-BEACH--------- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 PAGE ' .0014 DATE 06/14/89 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE PNENC BALANCE 2401 ANIMAL CONTROL - DEPT: - ANIMAL REGULTN 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 13 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - -- 750.-00 -- f„ 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1, 538. 00 ,, 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2, 500. 00 4315 MEMBERSHIP 50.00 4316 TRAINING 200.00 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 550.00 4397 2. 57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS ---- ---2, 824. 00 - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4. 964. 00 ,8 I: ai 2? 23 24 47 r 39 r:l 42 ` 44 4t. 4� � se 65 r� 67 89 f1rj 59 -5400 EQUIPMENT -- -- - 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2701 CIVIL DEFENSE 1, 541. 00 13, 000. 00 14, 541. 00 0. 00 97. 07 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 363. 92 - 154. 97 -- 716. 88 2, 628. 04 35. 00 81.27 389. 62 0. 00 5, 476. 02 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 00 680. 00 56. 15 680. 00 56. 15 111, 653. 00 111, 653. 00 DEPT: DISASTER PREP 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4316 TRAINING 4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS 21. 464. 00 822. 00 822. 00 0. 00 23, 108. 00 - 1. 700. 00 1, 700. 00 0. 00 425. 00 500. 00 3, 300. 00 1, 169. 00- 7,197.31 0- 7,197.31 7. 197. 31 1, 979. 74 0. 00 0.00 14. 58 1, 994. 32 617. 65 617.65 84, 548. 41 84, 548. 41 21, 642. 96 0. 00 555. 25 145. 80 22, 344. 01 567. 51 0. 00 883. 95 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 090. 46 27. 52 96. 3 821. 12 46. 6 1, 011. 99- 140. 4 15. 00 70.0 118.73 40.6• 160. 38 70. 8 2, 824. 00- 0. 0 2.602.48- 152.4 0. 00 . 1, 541.00 0.0 13, 394. 51 . 394. 51- 103. 0 13, 394. 51 1, 146. 49 92. 1 0. 00 0. 00 15.484.97 • 15, 484. 97 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 • 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4. 20 0. 00 0. 00 290. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 ' 53. 00 0. 00 0. 00 62. 35 90. 8 62. 35 90. 8 11,619. 62. 89. 5 11, 619. 62 89. 5 • 178. 96- 100. 8 822.00 ' 0.0 266. 75 67. 5 145. 80- 0. 0 763. 99 96. 6 1, 700. 00 1, 700. 00 • 4. 20- 425700 0-425'00 447.00 • 3,010.00 • . 1, 169. 00- 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 10.6 8. 7 0. 0 0 • F I NANC E-FA454 t , TIME 19:16:39 rs • r► - u ,j -- - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3. 056. 00 0. 00 ---- 294. 20 r ,s 5400 EQUIPMENT ,s, - 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 541.00 0.00 - 0.00 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5. 784. 00 2, 941. 49 2. 941: 49 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6, 325. 00 2, 941. 49 2. 941. 49 • 7, DIVISION TOTAL 34. 189. 00 4, 935. 81 ' 25, 579. 70 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 2701 CIVIL DEFENSE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - -. EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0015 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE �. DEPT: DISASTER PREP 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER DEPARTMENT TOTAL 34, 189. 00 4,935.81 25, 579. 70 zs 3101 MEDIANS - DEPT:-- ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN en z, 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 53. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 53. 00 '93. 00 • 2, 708. 80 11. 3 541. 00 2, 842. 51 3, 383: 51 0.0 50. 8 46. 5 8,556.30 74. 9 8. 556. 30 i 4 9 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 42. 676. 00 2, 715. 10 33, 190. 68 O. 00 ▪ 9, 485. 32 77. 7 r;;, 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 300.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 582. 2. 4 :,o 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF i, 011. 00 0. 00 428. 84 16 O. 00 582. 16 42. 4 31 -- 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN - - 1, 011. 00 0. 00 383. 95 O. 00 627. u'L 37. 9 r,,; r 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 0. 00 474. 00 2, 899. 50 O. 00 2. 899. 50- J. 0 3 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 44, 998. 00 3, 189. 10 36, 902. 97 0. 00 8, 095. 03 82. 0 34 r••u 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 36 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 38, 000. 00 3, 000. 00 30, 000. 00 0. 00 8, 000. 00 78. 9 „ 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT -- - - 2, 200. 00 O. 00 1, 259. 05 O. 00 940. 95 . 57. 2 r-, I OBJECT SUBTOTAL _ 40, 200. 00 3, 000. 00 31, 259. 05 O. 00 8, 940. 95 77. 7 ,,,IL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER r J1 4303 UTILITIES 29, 000. 00 892. 24 14. 483. 71 O. 00- 14, 516. 29 49. 9 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 5, 000. 00 121. 75 2. 242. 78 O. 00 2. 757. 22 44. 8 e, 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES - -- 950. 00 31. 67 - --- ----- - - 543. 25- O. 00 406. 75 57. 1 �6JI -- 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 500.00 0.00 456.51 0.00 • 43.49 91.3 es I�- 4397 2. 5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS 2, 960. 00- O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 2, 960.•00- 0. 0 ee OBJECT SUBTOTAL - ---- -- 32, 490. 00 1, 045. 66 17, 726. 25 - 0.00' 1.4. 763. T5 54. 5 . -,, e• e• DIVISION TOTAL -- -- . --117, 688. 00 7. 234. 76 85. 888. 27 - O. 00• ' 31. 799. 73 72. 9 ns,1-- _ • 3103 ST MAINTENANCE DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN • re,4100 PERSONAL SERVICES se 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 129, 824. 00 10, 362. 24 114, 169. 01 O. 00 15, 654: 99 87. 9 ss rse s7 ac r 4, 42 43 (- • 44 45L ac •4: 4o 49r- •. 51l 52 1 r� 55 r69 67 5S 1 ' 59 , e 9 10 ,2 f 14 r•„ • '' 24 L r2 zo ), r- rr'a l_ 3� r- '3 FINANCE-FA454 TJME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 -GENERAL FUND 3103 ST MAINTENANCE DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN - - CITY OF HERMOSA-BEACH- - -- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89• PAGE • '3016 DATE 06/14/89 91. 07. OF. YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2. 000. 00-- 3, 099. 00 3, 099. 00 138, 022. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE----- 79, 100. 00- - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 79, 100. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER------------------- ---- 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 23,000.00 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 3.500.00 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE --- - 10, 000. 00 - 4316 TRAINING 445.00 4397 2. 57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS 5. 245. 00 - OBJECT SUBTOTAL -- ------ 31, 700. 00 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *500- 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN *500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 0.00 3, 355. 00 3, 355. 00 20, 844. 00 20, 844. 00 - DIVISION -- TOTAL-- - -- - 273, 021. 00 - - 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 0. 00 0. 000 0. 00 10, 362. 24 6, 271. 11 6. 271. 11 64. 72 301. 89 321.61 0. 00 0. 00 688. 22 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1,736.78 1,736.78 48:00-- 446. 37 1, 766. 84 116. 430. 22 - - 59. 482.-31- -- 590 482. 31 16. 234. 95 2. 995. 21 11. 565. 53 429. 00 0. 00 31. 224. 69 0. 00 3, 354. 75 3, 354. 75 20. 841. 36 20. 841. 36 19. 058. 35 ---- - 231. 333. 33 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 83, 172. 00 6, 661. 80 74. 224. 71 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME ---- --• -- 500. 00 -- 0. 00 313. 45 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 2, 103. 00 0. 00 445. 28 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2, 103. 00 0. 00 1, 426. 53 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 91.878.00 6.661.80 76.409. 97 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 9, 700. 00 0. 00 5, 676. 24 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 6. 000. 00 470. 80 5. 620. 57 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 • 1, 952. 00 2, 652. 63 1. 332. 16 21. 591. 78 2. 4 14. 4 57. 0 84. 3 0. 00 19, 617. 69 75. 1 0. 00 19. 617. 69 75. 1 0. 00 6. 765. 05 70. 5 0. 00 • 504. 79 85. 5 0. 00 1, 565. 53- 115. 6 0. 00 16. 00 96. 4 0. 00 5, 245. 00- 0. 0 0. 00 475. 31 98. 5 3. 886. 19 3, 886. 19- 0. 0 0.00 • 0.25- 99.9 3. 886. 19 3, 885. 94- 215. 8 U. 00. 2. 64 99. 9 0. 00 2.64 99. 9 • 3..886. 19 37, 801. 48 86. 1 0.00' 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 8. 947. 29 186. 55 1, 657. 72 . 676. 47 4. 000. 00 15. 468,03 • 89. 2 62. 6 21. 1 67. 8 0. 0 83. 1 0. 00 4, 023. 76 . 58. 5 0.00 379.43 ' 93.6 3 r.. FINANCE-FA454 3 TIME 19:16:39 e u r,. On 24 ,9 r`n 251- .2261 51- •z, 1 31 r 35 r` 3e 39 eo r e, eZ " e5 t eb ab 6r 530 se 65 r 5B SI FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND .- 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4397-2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5403 VEHICLES 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL -- -- 4101 4101 PLANNING DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER • 4304 TELEPHONE - • CITY OF-HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 15, 700. 00 5, 600. 00 - 41, 000. 00 735. 00 - 600. 00 -- 100. 00 250. 00 3, 054. 00--- 45, 231. 00 0. 00 13, 900. 00 13. 900. 00 11. 000: 00 11, 000. 00 177. 709. 00 568. 418. 00 PLANNING 154, 269. 00 - 700. 00 3. 191. 00 3. 191. 00 2, 740. 00 164, 091. 00 1, 295. 00 1, 295. 00 1. 600. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 470. 80 526. 62 743. 97 25. 05 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 295. 64 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 841.29 841. 29 9, 269. 53 35. 562. 64 -- 11.296.81 5, 360. 06 24, 444. 32 364. 34 1. 001. 34 140. 00 230. 18 0.-00- 31, 540. 24 1, 996. 88 28, 417. 40 30, 414. 28 6, 730. 32 - 6, 730. 32 156. 391. 62 473. 613. 22 '1361. 38 122. 528. 67 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3, 751. 35 0.00 2.741.42 0. 00 2. 414. 03 9. 361. 38 131, 435. 47 0. 00 120. 20 0. 00 120. 20 135. 84 1. 724. 91 • • PAGE • 0017 DATE 06/14/89 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 4, 403. 19 71. 9 0. 00 1, 500. 58 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 500. 58 0.00 761. 74 761. 74 239. 94 15. 055. 10 370. 64 401. 34- 40. 00- 19. 82 3, 054. 00- 12. 190. 18 95. 7 63. 2 • 49. 5 166. 8 140. 0 92. 0 0. 0 73. 0 1, 996. 88- 0. 0 15, 279. 14- 209. 9 17, 276. 02- 224. 2 0. 00 4. 269. 68 61. 1 0. 00 4, 269. 68, 61. 1 2,262.32 6,148.51 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 110. 00 110. 00 • 0. 00 • 19, 055. 06 89. 2 88. 656. 27 84. 4 31, 7.40. 33 700: 00 560. 35- 449. 58 325. 97 32. 655. 53 • 1. 064. 80 1,064,80 79. 4 0. 0 117. 5 85. 9 88. 1 80. 0 17. 7 17. 7 1t4. 91- .107. 8 !":41:1,7 • 2 FINANCE-FA454 - TIME 19:16:39 -CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0018 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 - DATE 06/14/89 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 411P 5 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE eS 9 001 GENERAL FUND 4101 PLANNING DEPT: PLANNING 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER • ,2 13 r- - 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 16, 265. 00 • 1, 162. 54 - 13.-029. 66------ --- 0. 00 - 3, 235. 34 80. 1 isI` fir,,, I 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 200. 00 13. 02 79. 75 0. 00 • 120. 25 39. 8 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 500. 00 0. 00 282. 38 O. OU 217. 62 56. 4 4315 MEMBERSHIP 760. 00 80. 00 603. 00--- -- - 0. 00 157. 00 79. 3 r.„ 4316 TRAINING 1, 150. 00 0. 00 1, 228. 58 0. 00 78. 58- 106. 8 18 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 750. 00 339. 17 882. 17 0. 00 132. 17- 117. 6 4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS ----3, 901. 00- 0. 00 O. 00 -- 0. 00 3,.901. 00- 0. 0 r: ` - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 17, 324. 00 1, 730. 57 17, 830. 45 0. 00 506. 45- 102. 9 2.I( - ---- --5400 -EQUIPMENT22 - 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 1, 580. 00 0. 00- 1. 112. 47 0. 00 467. 53 70. 4 0 74 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.0 2+ 2s OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 2, 080. 00 0. 00 - 1,112. 47 -- ,,, O. 00 967. 53 53. 4 1281 to �-- - -- DIVISION - TOTAL-- --- -- - 184, 790. 00 11, 091. 95 - - 150, 498. 59 -- 110. 00 34, 181. 41 81. 5 r•2 4102 PLANNING COMM DEPT: PLANNING r.,2 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 334201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 6, 120. 00 204. 00 4, 811. 00 • 0. 00 1, 309. 00 78. 6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6, 120. 00 204. 00 - ---- 4.811. 00 0. 00 • 1, 309..00 78. 6 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3i - 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES - 2, 400. 00 145. 15 -- 3, 059. 26 0. 00 659, 26- 12793.. 4 3 4316 TRAINING 300.00 0.00 279.93 - 0..00 r` 1 20.07 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 550. 00 184. 00 445. 00 - 0. 00 105. 00 80. 9 30 4397 2. 5%- ANTICIPATED SAVINGS- - 217. 00- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 217. 00- 0. 0 e0 r,.. e, OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3, 033. 00 329. 15 3, 784. 19 0. 00 751. 19- 124. 7 e2 r' u DIVISION TOTAL 9, 153. 00 533. 15 B, 995. 19 e;O. 00 557: 81 93. 9 as . DEPARTMENT TOTAL - ---- -- - 193, 943. 00 11, 625. 10 159, 093. 78 11000 34, 739. 22 82. 0 i' 4201 BUILDING DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF :.1 e' 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES e�L 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 219, 661. 00 13, 130. 83 178, 094. 16 0. ob. 411 566. 84 81. 0 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 200.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.0 52 rr,� 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 5, 285. 00 0. 00 se 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 5, 285. 00 0. 00 1, 570. 48 0. 00 3, 714. 52 29. 7 3, 438. 18 0. 00 . 1, 846. 82 65. 0 rel 57 59 r•. 59 r' r 1.3 T- r 10 l z. 1 az as •z6 27 1 • :1 • 2.13 av r d, da iv:: 45 j • dG •d7 48 45 511 Oso c, 12 (^s, 54 55 88 87 /w 58 FINANCE-FA454 TLME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 4201 BUILDING - 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL -------- -CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 230, 431. 00 13, 130. 83 49, 979. 00 - 1, 121. 00 51, 100. 00 6, 773. 89 0. 00 6, 773. 09 183. 102. 82 32. 200. 54 1, 120. 17 33. 320. 71 PAGE • 0019 • DATE 06/14/89 91. 0/ OF .YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 47, 328. 18 79. 4 12. 462. 15 0. 00 12, 462. 15 5, 316. 31 0. 83 5. 317. 14. 89. 3 99.9 89. 5 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 2, 226. 00 189. 56 2. 157. 81 0. 00 68. 19 96. 9 - 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ---- -• ---11, 145. 00 ---- 1. 726. 29 -- -- 11. 239. 30 -- 551.80 646. 10- 105. 7 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1. 000. 00 43. 01 593. 50 0. 00 • 406. 50 59. 3 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 900.00 39. 11 1.232. 98 0. 00 • 332.98- 136.9 4315 MEMBERSHIP -- - 645.00 115.00 340.00 0.00 305.00 52.7 4316 TRAINING 2. 600. 00 59. 00 2. 239. 72 0. 00 360. 28 86. 1 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 1. 500. 00 O. 00 1. 144. 20 0. 00 355. 80 76. 2 4397 2. 57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS - -- 7, 218. 00- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7. 218. 00- 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 12, 798. 00 2, 171. 97 18, 947. 51 551. 80 6. 701. 31- 152. 3 5400 EQUIPMENT - -- - 5400 EQUIPMENT 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 • 0. 00 . 0. 0 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 55.00 0.00 54.26 0.00 0. 74 98. 6 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 1. 200. 00 0. 00 712. 25 0. 00 487. 75 59. 3 5403 VEHICLES 12. 000. 00 10. 834. 25 10, 834. 25 0. 00 1, 165. 75 90. 2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 13, 255. 00 10, 834. 25 11. 600. 76 0. 00 . 10654. 24 87. 5 DIVISION TOTAL 307,584.00 4202 PUB WKS ADMIN DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES ---- 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 96,711.00 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 0.00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY-OFF---- --- --2.336.00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2, 336. 00 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4, 000. 00 4187 UNIFORMS - - - -- 7, 000. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 112.383.00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - - --- 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 8,500.00 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 0.00 32. 910. 94 246, 971. 80 8, 093. 02 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 379. 14 0. 00 8, 472. 16 0. 00 0. 00 86, 592. 18 112.89 222. 28 706. 75 6, 541. 09 4. 708. 54 98. 883. 73 8, 972. 74 0. 00 13, 013. 95 47. 598. 25. 84. 5 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 479. 00 0. 00 10.118. 82 89. 5 112. 89- 0. 0 2.113.72 9.5 1.629..25, . 30.2 2. 541•. 09- 163. 5 2, 291. 46 67. 2 13, 499.•27 87. 9 • • 951. 74- . 111. 1 Q. 00 • 0. 0 CITY OF HERMOSA-BEACH - FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0020 TIME 19:16:39 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 - - 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION 001 GENERAL FUND 4202 PUB WKS ADMIN DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 8, 500. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4301 DAMAGE SETTLEMENTS 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE -4315-MEMBERSHIP - ---- 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4, 000. 00 5. 200. 00 8, 700. 00 0. 00 900. 00 500. 00 630. 00 1. 500. 00 1, 000. 00 3. 726. 00- 18, 704. 00 5400 EQUIPMENT - -_-.__------. --_-_-.-__--- 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 1,825.00 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 2,475.00 5403 VEHICLES 12, 000. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 16.300.00 DIVISION TOTAL MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 8, 972. 74 0. 00 430. 74 443. 22 0. 00 95. 20 0.00 0. 00. 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 969. 16 340. 80 0.00 10, 834. 25 11, 175. 05 155, 887. 00 20, 616. 37 4204 BLDG MAINT -- - - ---- DEPT: -- CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC- 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPL.IES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 132, 944. 00 2. 500. 00 3. 177. 00 3, 177. 00 300. 00 142, 098. 00 17, 860. 00 17,860. 00 75, 000. 00 42,352. 00 1. 000. 00 11, 720. 70 0.00 0.00 0.00 482. 24 12, 202. 94 1, 405. 00 1, 405. 00 7, 034. 28 193. 08- 77. 41 - 0. 00 4, 694. 03 7, 812. 21 704. 74 716. 03 502.- 00 1, 966. 25 607. 00 0. 00 - 17. 003. 06 1, 004. 89 1. 578. 60 10. 834. 25 - 13, 417. 74 ENCUMBRANCE ' UNENC BALANCE 7. 479. 00 .951. 74- . 111. 1 0. 00 4, 000. 00 0. 0 0.00 505.97 90.2 0.00 887.79 89.7 0.00 - 0.00 0.0 0. 00 195. 26 78. 3 0.00 216.83- 143.3 0. 00 - 128. 00 79. 6 0.00 466.25- 131.0 0. 00 • 393. 00 60. 7 0.00 3.726. 00- 0.0 0. 00 1. 700. 94 90. 9 • 369. 32 0. 00 • 0. 00 369. 32 138, 277. 27 848. 32 121. 363: 74 1. 014. 67 27. 40 2, 985. 43 732. 28 126, 123. 52 15, 499. 99 15, 499. 99 77, 586. 34 30, 603. 27 744. 53 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 00 0.'00 6.06 0. 00 • 0. 00 3, 495. 96 0. 00 • 450. 79 75. 2 896. 40 63. 7 1, 165. 75 90. 2 2, 512. 94 84. 5 16, 761. 41 89. 2 11, 580. 26 1. 485. 33 3. -149. 60 191: 57 • 432. '28- • 15, 974. 48 2, 360. 01 2. 360. 01 2, 586. 34- 8. 252. 77 2$5. 47 91. 2 40. 5 0. 8 93. 9 244. 0 88. 7 86. 7 86. 7 103. 4 80. 5 74. 4 0 r FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 4204 BLDG MAINT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0021 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 124300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3--- 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE „I 4316 TRAINING 4321 BUILDING SAFETY/SECURITY 4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL r4„ 0 Co! L 2-2 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS - ----OBJECT SUBTOTAL • 5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS 25 5601 BUILDINGS �z5 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 77 zn r� 30 3. r 33 33 r • t 45 4g a 54 55 r^ 56 57 58 DIVISION TOTAL 1, 200. 00 500. 00 4, 200. 00 6, 650. 00- 117, 602. 00 1, 315. 00 1, 333. 00 - 2, 648. 00 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 18. 17 0. 00 6, 936. 78 1, 314. 16 0. 00 1, 314. 16• 0. 00 0. 00 285, 208. 00 21, 858. 88 4205 EQUIP SERVICE DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF -4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER - 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE - 4316 TRAINING 4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 91, 095. 00 200. 00 2, 186. 00 - 2, 186. 00 95, 667. 00 3, 495. 00 2, 000. 00 2, 780. 00 255. 00 2, 927. 00- 5, 603. 00 1, 720. 00 5, BOO. 00 7, 520. 00 6, 828. 00 5, 423. 50 0. 00 451. 95 0. 00 5. 875. 45 517. 88 21. 37 388. 08 0. 00 0. 00 927. 33 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 417. 96 567. 29 0. 00 5, 932. 81 0. 00 115, 434. 24 1, 314. 16 1, 332. 85 2, 647. 01 ---- 3, 685. 97 3, 685. 97 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE O. OQ O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 3, 495. 96 O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 263, 390. 73 3, 495. 96 80, 031. 74 76. 37 730. 84 652. 95 81, 491. 90 4, 295. 49 1, 193. 81 2, 631. 40 255. 00 0. 00 --- 8, 375. 70 1,-719. 78 0. 00 1, 719. 78 0. 00 0. 00 . 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 84. 34 45. 79 0. 00 0.00 130. 13 0. 00 • 0. 00' 0. 00 5, 015. 52 0. 00 632. 71 500. 00 1, 732. 81- 6, 650. 00- 1, 328. 20- 0. 84 0. 15 0. 99 . 1;314. 03 1, 314. 03 18, 321. 31 11, 063. 26 123. 63 1, 455. 16 1, 533. 05 14, 175. 10 800. 49- 721. 85 102. 81 0. X00 2, 927. 00- 2. 902. 83- 0. 22 5, 800. 00 5, 800. 22 1,812.48 47. 2 0. 0 141. 2 0. 0 101. 1 99. 9 99. 9 99. 9 73. 7 73. 7 93. 5 87. 8 38. 1 33. 4 29. 8 85. 1 122. 9 63. 9 96. 3 100. 0 0. 0 151. 8 99. 9 0. 0 22. 8 73. 4 • 12 e17 19 21 23 z1 • :9 27L :9 el" 33 r, 32 I ?3r FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19: 16: 39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 4601 COMM RESOURCES DEPT: C1TY--OF HERMOSA- BEACH ---------- EXPENDITURE - --- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION 6, 828. 00 115, 618. 00--' 864, 297. 00 COMM PROMOTION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 417. 96 7, 220. 74 82, 606. 93 5, 015. 52 96, 602: 90 745, 242. 70 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES - . __...._. -----------..- 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 135, 065. 00 12, 769. 00 123. 258. 76 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500.00 0.00 480.74 -----4110-VACATION/SICK PAY-OFF 3,-741:00------ 0.00 ----is 129.87 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3. 741. 00 0. 00 2, 051. 28 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 49. 000. 00 2, 877. 51 45. 077. 97 OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 192, 047. 00 15, 646. 51 171. 998. 62 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4302 ADVERTISING 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4319 SPECIAL EVENTS 4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT - 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS '• 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL -59, 225. 00 11, 250. 00 70. 475. 00 6. 800. 00 5, 300. 00 9. 465. 00 5. 500. 00 500. 00 100. 00 625. 00 1, 000. 00 1, 600. 00 10, 000. 00 6. 660. 00- 34. 230. 00 7, 585. 00 44. 700. 00 8. 000. 00 60, 285. 00 2, 300. 00 2. 300. 00 3, 056. 50 11, 250. 00 14. 306. 50 119. 93 335. 31 251. 34 8. 04 33. 47 0. 00 125. 00 0.00 -- 153. 00- 816. 00 0.00 1. 536. 09 0. 00 35, 496. 42 0. 00 35, 496. 42 39, 129. 55 11.250. 00 50, 379. 55 • PAGE 0022 DATE 06/14/89 91.0%. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 0. 00 130. 13 17, 488. 36 1. 812. 48 18, 884. 97 101, 565. 94 73. 4 83. 6 88. 2 0. 00 11, 806. 24 91. 2 0. 00 19. 26 96. 1 0. 00 2, 611. 13 30. 2 0. 00 1. 689. 72 54. 8 O. 00 3, 922. 03 91. 9 0. 00 . 20. 048. 38 89. 5 0. 00 20, 095. 45 66. 0 0. 00 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 20. 095. 45 71. 4 2, 846. 98 0. 00 3. 953. 02, 41. 8 3, 655. 29 0. 00 1, 644. 71 68. 9 8. 154. 32 235. 43 1, 075. 25 88. 6 3, 230. BO 363. 36 1, 905. 84 65. 3 259.85 0.00 240. 15 51.9 455.30 0.00 355.30- 455.3 650.00 0.00 25.00- 104.0 707.65 0.00 292.35 70.7 975. 01 0. 00 624.99 ' 60. 9 8, 250. 45 0. 00 1, 749. 55 82. 5 0. 00 O. 00 6. 660. 00- 0. 0 29, 185. 65 598. 79 4, 445: 56 87. 0 4, 757. 98 1, 142. 23 1, 684. 79 77. 7 37. 574. 12 • 0. 00 7, 125. 88 • 84. 0 • 0. 00 0. 00 8, 000: U8 0. 0 42, 332. 10 1, 142. 23 16, 810. 67 72. 1 • 189. 21 2. 073. 82 0. 00 226. 18 . 90. 1 189. 21 2, 073. 82 0. 00 226. 18 • 90. 1 ii 64 55 i" ee az fp 119 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND DIVISION TOTAL - DEPARTMENT TOTAL 6101 PARKS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0023 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 . 91. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION 359. 337. 00 359, 337. 00 DEPT: PARKS/REC 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME -4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES - 4304 TELEPHONE 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5403VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8176 CIP 86-176 64. 532. 00 500. 00 1, 638. 00 - 1, 638. 00 4, 000. 00 72, 308. 00 - 108, 720. 00 12, 600. 00 121, 320. 00 19, 000. 00 120. 00 9. 420. 00 800. 00 1.450. 00 660. 00 500. 00 5. 886. 00- 26, 064. 00 17, 200. 00 17, 200. 00 236. 892. 00 236. 892. 00 DEPT:- STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 40, 200. 00 40, 200. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 67, 174. 73 295, 969. 74 67, 174. 73 295. 969. 74 4, 434. 30 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 711.00 • 5,145.30--- 8, 710. 00 0. 00 8, 710. 00 3, 763. 73 25. 02 926. 68 47. 48 4. 41 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 767. 32 0. 00 0. 00 53, 019.-46 0. 00 --- 198. 70 -- 383. 95 4, 349. 25 - 57.951.36-- - 91,-090. 00 - O. 00 . 91, 090. 00 22, 556. 46 156. 86 -- 11. 450. 65 470. 45 724. 37 167: 00 99. 00 0.00-- 35. 624. 79 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE • 1,741.02 61, 626. 24 82. 8 1, 741. 02, '61, 626. 24 82. 8 O. 00 O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -- O. 00 O. 00 0. 00 O. 00' . 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 .17, 110. 17 0.00 17,110.17 18, 622. 62 184. 666. 15 18, 622. 62 184, 666. 15 0. 00 0. 00 2, 731. 68 2, 731. 68 . 17, 110. 17 17, 110. 17 0. 00 0. 00 • 11, 512. 54 500.'00 1, 439. 30 1, 254. 05 349. 25- 14, 356. 64 17, 630. 00 12, 600. 00 30, 230. 00 3, 556. 46- 36. 86- 2, 030. 65- 329. 55 725. 63 493. 00 401. 00 5, 886. 00- 9, 560. 79-• 82. 1 O. 0 12. 1 23. 4 108. 7 80. 1 83. 7 0. 0 75. 0 118. 7 130. 7 121. 5 58. 8 49. 9 25. 3 19. 8 0. 0 136. 6 89. 83 99. 4 89. Q3 99. 4 • 35, 115.68 35, 115. 68 37, 468. 32 37, 468. 32 85. 1 85. 1 6. 7 6. 7 .49 a /. • 21 22 :-- 3. 23 20 25 26 27 z6 33 r 3= 33 24 f"3.5 38 37 rW 36 a' r 41 42 43 [- G°� 40, 44 •49 [. 50 r5.3 54 67 66 69 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 8176 CIP 86-176 - - - CITY- OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0024 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE APPROPRIATION DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 005. 00- 1, 005. 00 - DIVISION TOTAL 39, 195. 00 8177 CIP 87-177 - DEPT:- STREET/SAFETY-- 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES • 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE-- -40,000.00- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 40, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL --DEPARTMENT-TOTAL--- 8601 CIP 86-601 40, 000. 00 79, 195. 00 - -- DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4316 TRAINING 4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL - DIVISION TOTAL - 402. 00 402. 00 2, 598. 00 0. 00 75. 00- 2, 523. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 2, 731. 68 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - - 2, 731: 68 - 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 925. 00 0. 00 8602 CIP 86-602 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLfES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 88, 298. 00 88, 298. 00 0. 00 625. 00- 625. 00- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1,018.87 1,018.87 2, 597. 54 1, 906. 13 0. 00 --4. 503. 67 5, 522. 54 42, 358. 70 42, 358. 70 11. 86 0. 00 11. 86 - 0. 00 0. 00• 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00. 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 005. 00- 0. 0 1, 005. 00- 0. 0 36, 463. 32 6. 9 40, 000. 00 0. 0 40, 000. 00 0. 0 40, 000. 00 0. 0 76, 463. 32 3. 4 616. 87- 253. 4 616. b7- 253. 4 • 0.'46 99. 9 1, 906. 13- 0. 0 75. 00- 0. 0 1, 980. 67- 178. 5 0. 00 2, 597..54- • 188. 8 0:00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 45, 939. 30 45, 939. 30 11. 86- 625. 00- 63.6. 86• - 47. 9 47. 9 0. 0 0. 0 1. 8 • v • = FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 a--- r46 0 Yi r 22 •" ?d 31 ras 35 37 L 35 3, OB 57 r'&3 57 55 ri '77 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0025 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 • 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND DIVISION TOTAL 87, 673.00 0.00 42, 370.56 0.00 45, 302.44 48.3 8604 CIP 86-604 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS • 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS • ----1,550.00 543.11 7,659.69 - 1;-707.56._ 4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS 949.00- 0.00 0.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 601.00 543.11 7,659.69 . 1,707.56 38. 600. 00 38, 600. 00 2.894.22 2,894.22 12, 506. 76 589. 06 12, 506. 76 -- -- - 589. 06 DIVISION TOTAL 8606 CIP 87-606 39, 201. 00 3, 437. 33 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT ----- 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 109, 024. 00 109, 024. 00 5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS--- - - 5602 IMPRVMTS OTHER TNN BLDGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 0.00 0.00 20, 166. 45 2, 2%. 62 65. 717. 46 65, 717. 46 0.00 0.00 689.44 0.00 0.00 689.44 - 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 -500. 55-- 500. 55 25, 504. 18 33. 9 25. 504. 18 33. 9 7, 817.'25- 604. 3 949. 00- 0. 0 8, 766. 25- 1558. 6 16. 737. 93 57. 3 0.00 43.306.54 0.00 43.306.54 0. 00 • 0. 00 689.44- 689.44- • 89.44- 689.44- • 60.2 60. 2 0. 0 0. 0 0.00 500.55- 0.0 0.00 500.55- 0.0 0. 00 0. 00 1, 996. 16 0. 00 0.00 0.00 109, 024. 00 0. 00 8610 CIP 88-610 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - -- - -- 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL • 94, 974. 00 94, 974. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ' 4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS' 1,843.00- 20. ,843.00- 20. 423. 25 20, 423. 25 0. 00 1. 996. 16 0.00 68, 903. 61 0. 00 70, 606. 19 70, 606. 19 165.12 ' 165. 12 0. 00 0. 00 16- 1, 996. 16- ,40. 120. 39 24. 202. 69 24, 202. 69 • 0. 0 0. 0 63. 2 74. 5 74. 5 1, 843.. 00- 0. 0 oat • -A; •FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 4 40 e FUND DIV OBJT DESCR ,:r 001 GENERAL FUND 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 15 OBJECT SUBTOTAL ,2 13 r ,a 15 id 17 18 9 7.3 21� 22 41,3 24 2s • 26n 23 A2^ 3t 30 37 r� 39 r 4, rae 01 4r • 4' ay 45 41. 51 52 A53 54 55 1 58 67 5e • 4/4 CITY-OF--HERMOSA-BEACH -- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0026 .. FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 ' DATE 06/14/89 91.07. OF YEAR.COMPLETE APPROPRIATION • MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 1, 843. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 843. 00- .0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 93. 131. 00- -- -- -- 20, 423. 25 70, 606.-19 165. 12 22, 359. 69 75. 9 8611 CIP 88-611 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE - OBJECT SUBTOTAL - -- 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 --MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00--- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 8612 CIP 88-612 - - -- DEPT:-- -BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE -10,000:00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION -TOTAL- 10, 000. 00 0. 00 250. 00- --- 250. 00- - 500. 00 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 9, 750. 00 500. 00 8614 CIP 88-614 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 161, 492. 00 161, 492. 00 161, 492. 00 503, 196. 00 10, 151, 086. 00 172. 72 172. 72 172. 72 24, 533. 30 762, 846. 56 1, 094. 36 1, 094. 36 0. 00 -- 0.00 -- 107:.54--- ---- ----- 0. 00 - 107. 54 0. 00 1,201.90 1, 300. 00 1, 300. 00 1, 078. 60 0. 00 1, 078. 60 2, 378. 60 17, 184. 64 17, 184. 64 17, 184. 64 228, 334. 49 8, 517, 073. 13 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1,094.36- 1,094.36- 107.54- 107.54- 1,201.90- 0. 0 0.0• 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 8, 700. 00 13. 0 8, 700. 00 13. 0 1, 078. 60- 0. 0 250. 00- 0. 0 1, 328. 60- 431. 4 7, 371. 40 24. 3 144, 307. 36 144, 307. 36 0. 00 144, 307. 36 • 2, 461. 74 272, 399. 77 97, 953. 70 1, 536, 059717 10. 6 10. 6 10. 6 45. 8 84. 8 • f7 3 6 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE 1JNENC BALANCE I e r. 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND e - --- 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER --- DEPT: - MGMT/SUPPORT - 12 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT- 30, 500:00 -- 2, 542. 00 27, 962. 00 O. 00 2, 538. 00 91. 6 �is OBJECT SUBTOTAL 30, 500. 00 2, 542. 00 27, 962. 00 0. 00 2, 538. 00 91. 6 r` m DIVISION TOTAL 30, 500. 00 2, 542. 00 27, 962. 00 O. 00 2, 538. 00 91. 6. 9 -- DEPARTMENT TOTAL------- ---30. 500.00------- - 2, 542. 00 - - 27, 962. 00 -- _..__ .___. _-0. 00 2, 538. 00 91. 6 2601 STREET LIGHTING DEPT: STREET LIGHTING FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - ---- - - EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 PAGE • •0027 ' DATE 06/14/89 91. 0% OF. YEAR COMPLETE 21 n_. _ -- •,3 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES ;, 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 68, 904. 00 5, 846. 50 64, 705. 15 0. 00 . 4, 199. 85 93. 9 25 - 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME --- - - 1. 000. 00 0. 00 - - 0. 00 --- -. ..0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0 4025 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 1, 650. 00 0. 00 27. 40 O. 00 z, 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1, 650. 00 0. 00 1, 622. 60 1. 6 28 - - 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 973.35 0.00 676.65 58.9 ---- 4. 000. 00 1, 185. 00 2, 865. 00 0. 00 1. 135. 00 71. 6 1.';, 30 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4180 RETIREMENT 11, 394. 00 757. 88 6, 663. 52 0. 00 4, 730. 48 58. 4 8, 751. 00 683. 53 6, 974. 80 0. 00 1, 776. 20 79. 7 31 OBJECT SUBTOTAL --- 97, 349. 00 -- 8, 472. 91 82, 209. 22 0. 00 15, 139. 78 84. 4 r 32 33 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES• 3 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 18, 150. 00 - 0. 00 6, 500. 00 0. 00 11, 650. 00 35. 8 r... as 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 8, 000. 00 470. 79 5, 270. 13 0. 00 2, 729. 87 65. 8 s OBJECT SUBTOTAL 26. 150. 00 470. 79 11.770. 13 0. 00 - 14, 379. 87 45. 0 r•J0 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3., 4303 UTILITIES 180, 000. 00 14, 892. 56 150, 637. 70 0. 00 29, 362. 30. 93. 6 « 4304 TELEPHONE 300. 00 22.06 - 146.34 0.00 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 12, 500. 00 153. 18 • 47. 7 01 519. 48 5, 961. 82 O. 00 6. 538. 18 47. 6 ,; 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 2, 500. 00 429. 83 2, 446. 69 0. 00 53. 31 97. 8 °j 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 5, 500. 00 79. 71 3, 843. 34 O. 00 4316 TRAINING 500. 00 1, 656.66 69. C " i 0. 00 99. 00 0. 00 401. 00 19. 8 .51 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 201, 300. 00 15, 943. 64 163, 134. 89 0. 00 ` 38, 165. 11 81. 0 5400 EQUIPMENT `,• 5400 EQUIPMENT 0. 00 3, 809. 50- 0. 00 • 0. 00 0.. 00 0. 0 °B 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS -- -- O. 00 3, 809. 50 3, 809. 50 - O. 00 3, 809. 50- 0. 0 5o • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 3, 809. 50 0. 00 3, 809. 50- 0. 0 5, . DIVISION TOTAL 324. 799. 00 24, 887. 34 260, 923. 74 0. 00 63, 875. 26 80. 3 sa � DEPARTMENT TOTAL - - 324, 799. 00 24, 887. 34 - 260, 923. 74 0. 00 63, 875. 26 80. 3 rse1 • Ir' 7. CITY OF HERMOSA-BEACH 41, FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) a TIME 19:16:39 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 e FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE . UNENC BALANCE Y. PAGE 0028 DATE 06/14/89 91. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE r,,6 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND 8201 CIP 85-201 DEPT: STREET LIGHTING ,o „ 12 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 13 r 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY - O. 00 O. 00 - --180. 00 O. 00 r.,, OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 180.00 O. 011 • f - 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES _ __.__ ...._. �.,, 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 43, 126. 00 4, 561. 40- 4, 654. 59 0. 00 ,e OBJECT SUBTOTAL 43, 126. 00 4, 561. 40- 4, 654. 59 O. 00 - - .180. 00- 180. 00- 38, 471. 41 38, 471. 41 r•.r,l 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER • I, 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 874.00 0.00 873.56 0.00 0.44 n OBJECT SUBTOTAL 874. 00 - --- O. 00 - 873.56 ----- O. 00 0. 44 40, 5400 EQUIPMENT 27 - - -- - -- 5499 NON -CAP I TAL I ZED ASSETS O. 00 4, 561. 40 - 4, 561. 40 --- - - -- - 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 4, 561. 40 4, 561. 40 O. 00 41'6 n 2.8 R n DIVISION TOTAL 44, 000. 00 0. 00 10, 269. 55 O. 00 33, 730. 45 ;f 8202 CIP 85-202 DEPT: STREET LIGHTING ' 32[_ I 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES V 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 49. 500, 00 O. 00 17, 707, 40 660. 00 ' 31, 132.4,0 r35 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 49, 500. 00 O. 00 17, 707. 40 660. 00 31, 132. 60 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER-- - --- -- [... - r, w 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 0. 00 O. 00 • 32. 22 O. 00 as OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 O. 00 32.22 - 0.00 as- _ ..._._ _.. _ _ ,, DIVISION TOTAL 49, 500. 00 O. 00 17, 739. 62 660. 00 31, 100. 38 4,561.40- 4,561.40- 32.22- 32.22- r^<, 8203 CIP 85-203 DEPT: STREET LIGHTING -- 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 40, 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 27, 500. 00 O. 00 667. 93 0. 00 26, 832. 07 :a OBJECT SUBTOTAL 27, 500. 00 O. 00 667. 93 0, 00 26, 832' 07 ,, 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS O. 00 142. 34 142. 34 0. 00 ' OBJECT SUBTOTAL • O. 00 142.34 - 142.34 O. 00 r84 u /" 6e 67 6e 69 DIVISION -. TOTAL - 27, 500. 00 _ _ 142. 34 -- _ -- _ 810. 27- - -- 0. 00 142. 34- 142. 34- 0. 0 0. 0 10. 7 10. 7 99. 9 99. 9 0.0 0. 0 23. 3 37. 1 37. 1 0. 0 0. 0 37. 1 2. 4 2. 4 0. 0 0. 0 26, 689.. 73 2. 9 • 31 ra2 33 34 r3 38 37 38 r' dl as 41� • u ae 49 [i 53 • r` 63 64 65 — r56 57 58 FINANCE—FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 105 PARKING FUND 8203 CIP 85-203 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0029 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER DEPARTMENT TOTAL 121,000.00 FUND TOTAL MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 142.34 28, 819.44 476, 299. 00 27, 571. 68 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 660. 00 317, 705. 18 660. 00 x4 • 91, 520. 56 24. 3 157, 933. 82 66. 8 • i� 3 e 9 • r 12 u r ,e 15 lfl r _...-. la 21 I zz 41” 127 29 r 23 30 r 32[ 33 34 • 36 • 3,4 r'e, e2 e3! `e7I45 i ea 49 51 5.: r 53 54 55 r 57 58 58 CITY OF HERMOSA-BEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT /BY FUND) PAGE 0030 TIME 19.16:39 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 -- " 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV ODJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE • • UNENC BALANCE 110 PARKING FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER -- 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 1. 423, 508. 00 117, 400. 00 - - 1-, 306, 107: 00 0.00 117, 401. 00 • 91. 7 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 423, 508. 00 117, 400. 00 1, 306, 107. 00 0. Od 117, 401. 00 91. 7 DIVISION TOTAL 1, 423, 508. 00 117, 400. 00 1, 306, 107. 00 O. 00 117, 401. 00 91. 7 DEPARTMENT TOTAL . .- - --- - 1,423, 508. 00 117, 400. 00 1, 306, 107: 00--- 0. 00 . 117, 401. 00 91. 7 3301 VEH PKG DIST DEPT: PKG FACILITIES 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 14, 553. 00 1, 191. 20 13, 623. 93 ,,,0. 00 929. 07 93. 6 4106 REGULAR OVERT IME O. 00 O. 00 2. 33 - ---- O. 00 • 2. 33- 0. 0 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 358.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 358.00 O.0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 358.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 358. 00 O.0 4180 RETIREMENT -- 2, 997. 00 183. 10 1, 575. 43 -- 0. 00 1, 421. 57 52. 5 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 977.00 66. 71 919.33 O. 00 57.67 94.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 19, 243. 00 1, 441. 01 16, 121. 02 0. 00 3, 121. 98 83. 7 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 44, 361. 00 44, 361. 00 4, 017. 98 4, 017. 98 36. 934. 30 36, 934. 30 0. 00 • 7, 426. 70 83. 2 0. 00 7, 426. 70 83. 2 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE -- 100: 00 ---- 11.19 --- - -173.02 '- -0.00 73.02- 173.0 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 430.00 42.96 245.31 217.80 33. 11- 107. 7 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1,000.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1,000.00. 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL - -- 1,530.00 - 54. 15 418.33 217.80 893. 87 41. 5 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 470.00 0.00 0.00 149.90 320.10 31.8 470.00 0.00 0.00 149.90 320./0 31.8 • 65, 604. 00 5, 513. 14 3302 PARKING ENF DEPT: PKG FACILITIES 4100 PERSONAL SERVICgS 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC-- - -- -473,598.00 - 4106 --473,598.00- 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 10, 000.00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF. 11,579.00 53, 473. 65 367. 70 39, 005. 69 -- -- -- -407. 173. 40 - 256. 29 11, 294. 34 0. 00 1, 379. 86 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 11, 762: 65 82. 0 66, 424. 60 1, 294. 34- 10, 199. 14 85. 9 112. 9 11.9 • fl•,, 10 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 110 PARKING FUND 3302 PARKING ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN --- - -- 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4180 RETIREMENT 4187 UNIFORMS 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0031 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/$9 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: PKG FACILITIES 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 -CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4301 DAMAGE SETTLEMENTS 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL -- 5400 EQUIPMENT - 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN *500 5403 VEHICLES 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL - - 11, 579. 00 45. 000. 00 5. 000. 00 68, 579. 00 4. 000. 00 60, 732. 00 690, 067. 00 5. 000. 00 - - 5. 000. 00 1. 000. 00 3. 000. 00 44. 599. 00 19, 373. 00 8. 000. 00 26, 246. 00 400. 00 2. 000. 00 2. 000. 00 106, 618. 00 0. 00 401. 00 28, 691. 00 10. 919. 00 0. 00 40.011.00 81500. 00 8. 500. 00 850, 196. 00 915, 800. 00 2. 339. 308. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 14. 24 5. 750. 00 573. 50 5. 068. 55 468. 56 4. 057. 31 55, 194. 14--- 3. 301. 95 ---- 19. 353. 50 4, 383. 47 46. 136. 54----• 3. 606. 33 45. 244. 31 541. 873. 70 - ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ^ 723. 24 0. 00 - 723. 24 • 328. 00 3; -414.67 - - - - - - 0. 00 328. 00 3, 414. 67 A.O. 00 0. 00 339. 34 6. 169. 05 283. 04 378. 69 742. 81 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 912. 93 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 114. 00 114. 00 63. 549. 07 69. 062. 21 186. 462. 21 0. 00 2, 994. 88 32, 152. 75 12. 872. 14 4. 719. 29 14, 077. 13 240. 00 1, 834. 43 1, 472. 63 70. 363. 25 0. 00 1,417.65 - -15. 959. 77 0. 00 4, 645. 45 22. 022. 87 8. 067. 41 8. 067. 41 645. 741. 90 699, 215. 55 2. 005. 322. 55 0. 00 0. 00 330. 82 2. 838. 90 . 0. 00 14. 224. 76 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 17, 394. 48 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 90 0..00- 0. ..00• 0. 00 18, 117. 72 48, 485. 42 18, 485. 42 8. 277. 05 25. 646. 50 616. 53 22. 442. 46 329. 57-- 151487. 69 147. 470. 06 1,585.33 1,.585. 33 1, 000. 00 5. 12 12, 115. 43 3. 661. 96 3. 280. 71 2. 055. 89- 160. 00 165. 57 527. 37 18, 860. -27 0. 00 - 1. 016. 65- 12, 731. 23 10,919.00 4. 645. 45- 17, 988. 13 • 432. 59 432. 59 186, 336. 38 198. 099. 03 315. 500. 03 28. 5 43. 0 87. 6 67. 2 108. 2 74. 4 78. 6 68. 2 68. 2 0. 0 99. 8 72. 8 81. 58. 9 107. 8 60. 0 91. 7 73. 6 82.3. 0. 0 353. 5 55. 6 0. 0 0. 0 55. 0 94. 9 94. 9 78. 0 78. 3 86. 5 • .,z FINANCE-FA454 s - TIME 19:16:39 I 5 7 r. r• 9 r', 17 r,e 15 r"- 1.3 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 115 STATE GAS TAX_FUND 35 47 r 4, 42 43 L_ C4-1 45 L 4.S • 43 ID 53 5 52 r 53 54 55 r se 57 69 (169 CITY OF HERMOSA-BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE • .0032 - - FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 •DATE 06/14/89 -- - 91. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE • APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT -- 92, 586. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 92. 586. 00 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 92, 596. 00 - -- - 92, 586. 00 - - 3101 MEDIANS DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL - --- 0. 00 - -- 6, 354. 00 6, 354..00 6, 354. 00 6, 354. 00 0. 00 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL - 0.00 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8160 CIP 85-160 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 117, 964. 00 117, 964. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 117, 964. 00 0. 00 8165 CIP 87-165 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 19,351.00 86, 232. 00 86, 232. 00 86, 232. 00 86, 232. 00 0. 00 0.00 - 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 471.76- 471.76- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 471. 76- 0. 00 471. 76- 0. 00 38, 470. 50 38, 470. 50 0. 00 0. 00 38, 470. 50 0. 00 0. 00 13, 994. 00 0. 00 6. 354. 00 • 93. 1 6, 354. 00 93. 1 6, 354. 00 93. 1 6. 354. 00 93. 1 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 471.76 0.0 471. 76 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 471. 76 0. 0 471'. 76 0. 0 79, 493: 50 79. 493. 50 79, 493. 50 32. 6 32. 6 32. 6 5, 357. 00 72. 3 . 2 FINANCE-FA454 3 r TIME 19:16:39 5 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR e _ r*11 12 ,s ,6 .7 .:0 2' 22 24 25 0.1 31 37 - 02 451 u 45 an fp, s, �" sa 5e ss 57 /^ 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 8165 CIP 87-165 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES -- OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION . STREET/SAFETY --8170 CIP- 87-170 - DEPT: - 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME ---- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 19, 351. 00 0. 00 0. 00 19, 351. 00 STREET/SAFETY-- 146. 00 - 146. 00 137, 354. 00 137. 354. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 13, 994. 00 0. 00 0.• 00 13, 994. 00 145.44--• 145. 44 • 99, 334. 64 102, 409. 11 99, 334. 64 102, 409. 11 0. 00 33. 27 2, 557. 32 0. 00 33. 27 2, 557. 32 DIVISION TOTAL - - 1371 500: 00 8171 CIP 87-171 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 145, 941. 00 -- 145, 941. 00 145. 941. 00 8174 CIP 88-174 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 132. 000. 00 132. 000. 00 - 132. 000. 00 - - 99, 367. 91 PAGE 0033 DATE 06/14/89 • 91.07. OF YEAR. COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00• 555. 39 • 555. 39 555. 39 -4 0. 00 0. 00• 2, 880. 82 2, 880. 82 0. 00 0. 00 105,-111. 87 2, 880. 82 55, 378. 50 116, 269. 15 55, 378. 50 55, 378. 50 116, 269. 15 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 116, 269. 15 - --- 5, 357. 00 555.39- 555.39- . 4, 801. 61 55.39- 555.39- .4,801.61 0. 56 0. 56 32, 064. 07 32, 064. 07 • 2,557.32- ' ,557.32-' 2,557.32- 72. ,557.32- 72. 3 0. 0 0. 0 75. 1 99. 6 99. 6 76. 6 76. 6 0. 0 0. 0 29, 507. 31 78. 5 0. 00 29, 671. 85 0. 00 29, 671. 85 0.00' 29.671.85 0. 00 132, 000. 00 0. 00 132, 000. 00 0. 00 132, 000. 00 79. 6 79. 6 79. 6 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 • CITY OF HERMOSA—BEACH- z1' FINANCE—FA434 EXPENDITURE 'SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0034 a TIME 19:16:39 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 4 91. 0% OF YEAR •COMPLETE 5 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR B� 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 9 ,z r14� ,3 ,5 r4, 43 1 43 51 r 53 54 ' r 57 58 59 r L APPROPRIATION DEPARTMENT TOTAL-- — ----- 552, 756. 00 8302 CIP 87-302 DEPT: STORM DRAIN 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL -- DIVISION - - TOTAL - 64. 896. 00 64, 896. 00 — --- 64. 896. 00 -- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 64, 896. 00 FUND TOTAL MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. . ENCUMBRANCE' UNENC BALANCE 154, 746. 41 273, 845. 52 0. 00 0.'00 39. 201. 19 39, 201. 19 3, 436. 21 275, 474. 27 .50. 1 0. 00 25, 694. 81 60. 4 0. 00 0. 00 39, 201. 19 0. 00 0. 00 710, 238. 00 161, 100. 41 39. 201. 19 — 0. 00 398, 806. 95 3, 436. 21 25, 694. 81 60. 4 25, 694. 81 25, 694. 81 307. 994. 84 60. 4- 60. 4 56. 6 c e2 3 r.5 a bi r 9L_ 15 I - 15 ra5 38 r.3.. 33 ac <2 43 49 51 r63 5e 55 56 57 59 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0035 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT--- ---- 11.250. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 11, 250. 00 DIVISION TOTAL -- -- - DEPARTMENT- TOTAL .8502 CIP 85-502 11, 250. 00 -11,250.00 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 8506 CIP 86-506 5, 500. 00 5, 500. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 5, 500. 00 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT -SERVICES- - 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS 5602 IMPRVMTS OTHER THN BLDGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 8507 CIP 87-507 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 10, 000. 00 I0, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10, 000. 00 DEPT: PARKS MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 11, 250. 00 11, 250. 00 11, 250. 00 11, 250. 00 11. 250. 00 11, 250. 00 11, 250: 00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 --1.1, 250. 00 -- . - 0. 00 ,y 0. 00 1, 716. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -- - 1.-716.0O--- 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 716. 00 506. 35 506. 35 9. 445. 49 9, 445. 49 0. 00 9, 951. 84 -- 5. 100. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 780. 84 7, 780. 84 7, 780. 84 0.00 0. 00 • 0. 00 0. 00' 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1 00 . 0 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 100. 0 3. 784. 00 3, 784. 00 31. 2 31. 2 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 7. 780.84.- 7, 780. 84- 0. 0 0. 0 3, 996. 84- 172. 6 9, 493. 65 9, 493. 65 9, 445, 49- .9, 445. 49- 48. 16 • 5. 0 5. 0 0. 0 0. 0 99. 5 5, 100, 00 0. 0 s 7 e 13 • 21 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 24 26 27 28 31 I-_ • r3 30 „r- rm 35L 4C r4, 42 4, • 44 4;, di 40 4: as 49 A61 r53 54 66 87 DIVISION TOTAL - • --_ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ----- , -- - EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) • PAGE 0036 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 91.0% OF -YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 5, 100. 00 0. 00 5, 100. 00- - 0. 00 8508 CIP 87-508 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 121, 000. 00 - 121, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL - - - 12-1, 000. 00- 8516 CIP 89-516 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 -- DIVISION TOTAL - ___ _0.00 8517 CIP 89-517 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 000. 00 1, 000. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 -0. 00 - 0. 00 2,954.55 2,954.55 - 0.00 0.00 -- - 2, 954.-55--- - -- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -- 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 -- 0.00 0.00 DIVISION TOTAL -- 0.00 8518 CIP 89-518 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL - ---- 8519 CIP 89-519 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 . 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 • 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 • 5, 100. 00 0. 0 5, 100. 00 0. 0 118, 045.45 118, 045.45 2. 4 2. 4 118, 045. 45 2. 4 • 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 , 0.0 0. 00 0. 0 0.Q0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0. 00 0. 0 Q. 00 . 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 0 • ON 5 B e 12 (.fi 16 r`17 10 24 25 .- J1 r'' 92 L -- r•35 36 10 r 41 02 43 r •0.1 j fib 4- ,10 49 Aol 5L r 55 r 56 57 57 F INANC E-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 125 -PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL --- DIVISION TOTAL - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - -- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION 8520 89-520 DEPT: PARKS MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0..00 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 7, 900. 00 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 7, 900. 00 - - 0. 00 - -- DIVISION - TOTAL - ------ --- - 7, 900. 00- -- 0. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 149, 500. 00 1, 000. 00 FUND TOTAL 160, 750. 00 12, 250. 00 PAGE 0037 DATE 06/14/89 91. 07. OF' YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 00 0.00 14, 622. 39 25, 872. 39 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 7, 900. 00 - 7, 900. 00 0. 0 0.0 0. 00 7, 900. 00 0. 0 7, 780. 84 • 127, 096. 77 14. 9 7, 780. 84 127, 096. 77 20. 9 3 9 _ ese 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 - - CITY -OF HERMOSA-BEACH --- .- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0038 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 -"-- " 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 126 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND 12 r" 15 15 r17 l9 .r C�° 21 22 . 27 21 IT 29 r29 r)7 21 e` 35 29 37 F.-- 33 33 r Al 42 43 ar. • 1; au Ona9 5, 54 55 '- 59 p1 ee c'5° 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT - -- OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL -DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 -- •--------" 0. 00 - 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 xa 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 • 0 3 e �e e 12 13 r-14 15 15 /" 17 15 21 2: •" 24 41,6 25 30 31 r-32 . 33 r` 35 35 37 • _. r-3.1 3)! ao f" n1 42 41-, .1 46 •.1 45 49a9 r_ 5, r` 53 54 55 55 57 55 '3 FINANCE—FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 127 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0039 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT - 1, 041, 954. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 041, 954. 00 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 1, 041, 954. 00 1, 041, 954. 00 -- 1, 041, 954. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 86, 829. 00 86, 829. 00 86, 829. 00 86, 829. 00 86, 829. 00 955, 122. 00 - 955, 122. 00 955, 122: 00 955, 122. 00 955, 122. 00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 86, 832. 00 86, 832. 00 86, 832. 00 86, 832. 00 86, 832. 00 91. 6 91. 6 91. 6 91. 6 91. 6 • 2 3 • e FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME 19:16:39 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 CITY OF HERMOSA-BEACH ( e 9 15L 19 9 _ 21 I zz 23 2e r • a, "L__.. 28 • 29 38 31 33 r 35 35 37 r 38 39 40 _. r et r 41 a, a9 S3 134 6e 65 ,r 69 51 5q 59 r FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 130 REVENUE SHARING FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL - - ----- FUND TOTAL 30. 700. 00 30, 700. 00 30. 700. 00 - 30. 700. 00 - 30, 700. 00 1, 590. 00 1. 590. 00 1. 590. 00 1. 590. 00 1, 590. 00 29.110. 00 29. 110. 00 29, 110. 00 29.-110. 00 - 29, 110. 00 • PAGE 0040 DATE 06/14/89 ' 91.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 3- 0. 00 0. OQ 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 • 1, 590. 00 • 1, 590. 00 1. 590. 00 1..590. 00 1. 590. 00 • 94. 8 94. 8 94. 8 94. 8 94. 8 F INANCE-FA454 TIME 19: 16: 39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 3401 DIAL A RIDE 10 o 2, L -. s: fin 24 xs 126 27 23 rzo ao 33 37 34 r Z5 37 �-F- 1 r3s�- 40 r at 4; 41441 46 L- 40 • 47 a9 -o l 51 r ,3 54 „1 • Si :J 59 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION DEPT:-- PUBLIC TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES • -- -- 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC----- - 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4180 RETIREMENT --4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 3402 COMMUTER BUS DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC -- 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS --- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES---- ---- 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL --- 3403 BUS PASS SUBSDY 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 14, 730. 00 0. 00 2. 004. 00 1, 078. 00 17, 812. 00 142, 820. 00 142, 820. 00 50. 00 300. 00 350. 00 160, 982. 00 PUBLIC TRANSIT 4. 931.00 0. 00 666. 00 372. 00 5, 969. 00 40, 000. 00 40, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 45, 969. 00 DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 1, 498. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 1,213.22 0. 00 152. 56 43. 62 1, 409. 40 -13:-191.86 -- 0. 00 1, 451. 96 -- 825: 15 15, 468. 97 PAGE 0041 DATE 06/14/89 91. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 0. 00 1, 538. 14 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 552. 04 0.00 252. 0. 00 2, 343_ 03 0. 00 ' 71, 837. 34 0. 00 0. 00 71, 837. 34 0. 00 4. 16 14. 00 18. 16 1,427.56 444. 40 0. 00 56. 89 17. 74 519. 03 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 519. 03 48. 48 • 41. 60 24. 14-- 65. 74 87, 372. 05 4. 881: 35 0. 00 501. 58 298. 26 5, 681. 19 4, 807. 00 4. 807. 00 6. 00 6. 00 10, 494. 19 -- 268. 56 89. 5 0. 0 72. 4 76. 5 86. 8 70, 982. 66 50. 2 70, 982. 66 50. 2 0. 00 8. 40 83. 2 0. 00. 275.86 8.0 0. 00 284. 26 18. 7 • 0. 00 ' 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. '00' 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 73, 609. 95 54. 2 • 49. 65 98. 9 0. 00 0. 0 164. 42 : 75. 3 73. 74 80. 1 287. 81 95. 1 35, 193. 00 12. 0 35, 193. 00 12. 0 6. 00- 0. 0 6. 00- 0. 0 35, 474. 81 22. 8 • 1,2'29.44 17.9 • 411 • 2 3 5 • F I NANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 r e FUND DIV OBJT DESCR IN• 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND ,1 12 r*,[- ,a t9 rti 2, z .23 N I- s: r L 28 r' 29 rr, 3.5 37 r 3, J3 43 41 2 C na I 41- 4) 1- 4) • 50 S1 CITY OF HERMOSA-BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION 3403 BUS PASS SUBSDY DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 36. 00 36. 00 203. 00 126. 00 1, 899. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 16.048.00 --- OBJECT SUBTOTAL- - - -- ----- 16. 048; 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 70. 00 70. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 1. 21 0.00 0. 00 15. 94 10. 78 76. 41 2. 882. 00 2, 882. 00: ------ 0.00 0. 00 ----157. 60 126. 04 560, 39 12. 204. 00 • ----12. 204. 00-- 0.00 - - 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 PAGE 0042 • DATE 06/14/89 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENdUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE -4 0. 00 0. Od 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 • 8. 19- 36. 00 36. 00 45. 40 0. 04- 1, 338. 61 3, 844. 00 3, 844. 00 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 77. 6 100. 0 29. 5 76. 0 76. 0 70. 00 0. 0 70. 00 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL - 18. 017. 00 2. 958. 41 12. 764. 39 0. 00 5, 252. 61 . 70. 8 3406 CIRC ELEMENT - DEPT: --- - PUBLIC TRANSIT 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES • 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE-- 17. 735. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17, 735. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 17. 735. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17, 735. 00 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 17.735.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,735.00 0.0 DEPARTMENT TOTAL - - 242, 703. 00 4, 905. 00 110. 630. 63 0. 00 • 132, 072. 37 45. 5 FUND TOTAL 242, 703. 00 4, 905. 00 110, 630. 63 0. 00 . 132, 072. 37 45. 5 • 0 • a ri, 12 r,< 15 I ,B ,B ,g [i 2 •23 za 25 A27 TO 31 �a. r" 30 37 39 L P r41 42 moi._ .Ai OB ag /" cg 5. 55 52 T FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 150 GRANT FUND 8102 CIP 85-102 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION DEPT: - STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE------151, 377. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 151, 377. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 151, 377. 00 8137 CIP 85-137 -- DEPT:--STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE--- OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 72, 600. 00 -- -- 72, 600. 00 72, 600. 00 8138 CIP 85-138 ----- - - DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 191,400.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 191,400.00 DIVISION TOTAL 191, 400. 00 8173 CIP 88-173 DEPT:-- STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE- --132,000.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 132, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8508 CIP 87-508 132, 000. 00 547, 377. 00 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 74. 50 74. 50 74. 50 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -- -3. 291-22 -- 3, 291. 22 3, 291. 22 0:00 - - 0. 00 0. 00 • 11, 739. 50 11, 739. 50 11. 739. 50 0.00- - - O. 00 0. 00 74. 50 - 15, 030. 72 0. 00 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL -- - - 0. 00 ------------ 0. 00- 7. 15 7. 15 PAGE 0043 DATE 06/14/89 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE • 16, 000. 00 16, 000. 00 16, 000. 00 "'0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 16. 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 7.-15 0. 00 132, 085. 78 132, 085. 78 12. 7 12. 7 ' 132, 085:78 12. 7 72, 600. 00 72, 600. 00 72, 600. 00 179, 66Q. 50 179. 860. 50 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 6. 1 6. 1 179, 660. 50 6. 1 132, 000. 00 132, 000. 00 132, 000..00 • 516, 346. 28 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 5. 6 1. 15- 0. 0 7:15- 0. 0 7. 15- O. 0 .-- ..J . 2 3 r 9 ,u 12 5400 EQUIPMENT FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 150 GRANT FUND --8516-CIP 89-516 CITY -OF -HERMOSA-BEACH - ---- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) . . . PAGE 0044 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 -- - 91. 0% OF -YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: PARKS - 73 - 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE -THAN $500 7,958.-00-- rr14 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7, 958. 00 u DIVISION TOTAL 7, 958. 00 8517-CIP 89-517 - -- DEPT:-- PARKS ----- i 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN -$500--------8, 742. 00----- - 0. 00 - u 23 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 8..742.00 0.00 24 25 DIVISION TOTAL 8. 742. 00 n - - -_ 8518 CIP 89-518 - ----- - DEPT: --PARKS ze rag 5400 EQUIPMENT :3 ---- 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 - 12, 305. 0031 - r2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 12, 305. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 -- O. 00 - 0. 00 - 7, 958. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 958. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 958. 00 0. 0 . 33 r 3� 37 r 4, 43 411 63 64 66 r 66 67 ,B ya DIVISION TOTAL 12. 305. 00 8519 CIP 89-519 - - DEPT-: - PARKS 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE -THAN -$500 -- OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL -2. 108. 00 2, 108. 00 2, 108. 00 ---31, 113. 00 578, 490. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 8.742.00 0:0 0. 00 8, 742. 00 0. 0 0. 00 8, 742. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 12, 305. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 12, 305. 00 ' 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 Q. 00 12, 305. 00 0. 0 0. 00 --- - - 0. 00 - . 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 74. 50 0. 00 7. 15 • 15, 037. 87 0.00 0. 00 16, 000. 00 2, 108. 00 2, 108. 00 2, 108. 00 31, 105. 85 547, 452. 13 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 5. 3 O • 2 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 16 r 17 18 .L 22 .73 2a 25 On 27 28 r29 .3 31 r 32 33 34 (-'35 38 37 40 a> r63 50 ss • 57 58 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 155 CROSSING GUARD FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0045 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION ---1299 BUDGET TRANSFER --- - DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER - -4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT -- ---- 4, 500. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4, 500. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 4, 500. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL -- ----- -- 4, 500. 00 2102 CROSSING GUARD DEPT: POLICE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 11,080.00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 267.00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 267.00 4113 CROSSING GUARDS 36, 000. 00 4180 RETIREMENT - 1, 506. 00 4187 UNIFORMS 1, 000. 00 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 780.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 50, 900. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - - 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 7,700.00 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 500.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 8, 200. 00 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 59, 100. 00 59, 100. 00 63, 600. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 375. 00 375. 00 375. 00 375. 00 857. 20 0. 00 0. 00 3, 045. 28 120. 08 0.00 72. 36 4, 094. 92 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 4, 094. 92 4, 094. 92 4, 469. 92 4, 125. 00 4, 125. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 125: 00 0. 00 4,:125. 00 -- - 0. 00 10, 217. 97 0.00 - 300. 39 25, 333. 17 - 1. 893. 64 408. 47 752. 18 38, 905. 82 2, 000. 00 0: 00 2, 000. 00 40, 905. 82 40, 905. 82 45, 030. 82- 0r 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 • 55. 38 • 0. 00 55. 38 0. 00 . • 0.00 0. 00 55.38 55.38 55.28 375. 00 375. 00 375. 00 375. 00 862. 03 267. 00 33. 39- 10, 666. 83 387. 64- 536. 15 27. 82 11, 938. 80 • 5, 700. 00 500.00 6, 200. 00 18, 138. 80 18, 138..80 18, 513. 80 91. 6 91. 6 91. 6 91. 6 92. 2 0. 0 112. 5 70. 3 125. 7 46. 3 96. 4 76. 5 25. 9 0.0 24. 3 69. 3 69. 3 70. 8 • F INANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 r5 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 6 rN 8I g 160 SEWER FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 12 1 14 15 tr • 21 22 •23 24 10 '9 C :5 •27 26 • 3, r � 37 r~ 38 39 47 49 51 r'53 54 85 r88 87 88 e- 59 CITY- OF-- HERMOSA - BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ----4399- OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT---- --- 54, 529.-00- 1, 988. 00 - - ---52,-542.-00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 54. 529. 00 1. 988. 00 52, 542. 00 PAGE 0046 DATE 06/14/89 91.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 0.- 00. 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 54, 529. 00 1, 988. 00 52. 542. 00 0. 00 - DEPARTMENT TOTAL---------- 54, 529. 00 -- - 1. 988. 00 52, 542. 00 --- - 0. 00 .3102 SEWER/ST DRAIN DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES - 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 86, 275. 00 6, 477. 30 73. 178. 39 �0. 00 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME -- -- 2, 500. 00 128. 16 466. 73 - 0. 00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 2, 081. 00 0. 00 446. 37 0. 00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2, 081. 00 192. 24 1, 391. 94 0. 00. 4180 RETIREMENT 12, 101. 00 877. 51 - - 8. 221. 29- 0. 00 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7, 791. 00 543. 85 5, 740. 53 0. 00 • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 112, 829. 00 8. 219. 06 89, 445. 25 0. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 2, 700. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 2, 700. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 400. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER - 4303 UTILITIES 900.00 58.54 668.87 0.00 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 8, 611. 00 302. 73 5, 759. 48 0. 00 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES - 1, 500. 00 92. 89 755. 28 0. 00 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1, 500. 00 2. 75 893. 95 1, 513. 00 4316 TRAINING 150.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 12. 661. 00 456. 91 8, 077. 58 1, 513. 00 • 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT 0.00 0.00 435.79 0.00 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN 3500 989.00 0.00 0.00 0.•00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 989.00 0.00 435.79 0.00 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 9. 070. 00 748. 32 8, 979. 84 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL -- 9. 070. 00 748. 32 - -8. 979. 84 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL - 140, 949. 00 -- 9. 424. 29 -- -106. 938. 46 -- 1, 513. 00 • 1, 987. 00 • 96. 3 1. 987. 00 96. 3 1. 987. 00 96. 3 1. 987.00 96. 3 13. 096. 61 2. 033. 27 1. 634. 63 689. 06 3. 879. 71 2. 050. 47 23, 383. 75 2. 700. 00 2, 700. 00 5. 400. 00 231. 13 2. 851. 52 744. 72 906. 95- 150. 00 5-150.00 3. 070. 42 435,. 79- - 00 553. 21 90. 16 90. 16 84. 8 18. 6 21. 4 66. 8 67. 9 73. 6 79. 2 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 74. 3 66. 8 50. 3 160. 4 0. 0 75. 7 0. 0 0. 0 44. 0 99. 0 99. 0 32. 497. 54 76. 9 6 • - I 9{ I F I NANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 160 SEWER FUND DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8404 CIP 85-404 a .'4 (-3'1 ' 711 33 C1.6 :b 7 4,) 4, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - - EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0047 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 91.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE APPROPRIATION 140, 949. 00 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL - DIVISION TOTAL 9, 424. 29 106, 938. 46 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 8405 CIP 86-405 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 089, 000. 00 1, 089, 000. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 16, 142. 88 16, 142. 88 - 0. 00 0. 00 57. 10 0. 00 0. 00 57. 10 1, 089, 000. 00 0. 00 8406 CIP 88-406 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL as ' 8407 CIP 88-407 • 1I a6 r s, •.Z r53 54 484, 000. 00 484, 000. 00 6,406.92 6,406.92 484, 000. 00 6, 406. 92 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL. --- - FUND TOTAL 50, 000. 00 50, 000. 00 50, 000. 00 1, 623, 000. 00 1, 818, 478. 00 1, 513. 00 •32,.497. 54 76. 9 oft • 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.6a 0. 00 0. 00 • 0. 00 16, 199. 98 0. 00 13, 175. 62 13, 175. 62 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 1, 072, 857. 12 1, 072, 857. 12 57. 10- 57. 10- 1, 072, 4100. 02 0. 00 470, 824. 38 ' 0. 00 • 470, 824. 38 13, 175. 62 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6. 406. 92 17, 819. 21 0. 00 29, 375. 60 188, 856. 06 • 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 513. 00 1. 4 1. 4 0.0 0. 0 1. 4 2. 7 2. 7 470. 824.'3,8 2. 7 • 50, 000. 00 50, 000. 00 50, 000. 00 1, 593, 624. 40 1, 628. 108. 94 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 10. 4 `2 3 ''1, 5 B 7 9 ID r it 12 • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND CITY -OF HERMOSA-BEACI-1 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0048 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 - -. - - - 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION 1299 -BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT:-- MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 13 -------- ---4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT------- 65, 309. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 65, 309. 00 ; 16 r17 ID DIVISION TOTAL MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 5, 326:00- ---- 59; 982. 00 5, 326. 00 59. 982. 00 65. 309. 00 5, 326. 00 I9 DEPARTMENT TOTAL -65.309.00 21 22 4173 2, 23 liver 27 29 X29 30 31 r` 33 33 • 34 r.35 37 r� 39 ,0 2103 SPEC INVESTGTNS DEPT: POLICE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC -4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 4109 COURT TIME - 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4322 UNCLASSIFIED OBJECT SUBTOTAL 59, 982. 00 5. 326. 00 • - 59, 982. 00 - • ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. - 0. 00. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 • • 5, 327. 00 5. 327. 00 91. 8 91. 8 5. 327. 00 91. 8 5, 327. 00 91. 8 47. 428. 00 0. 00 0. 00 "0. 00 47, 428. 00 0. 0 0. 00 - - 9, 712. 00 - -- 24, 500. 00 0. 00 24, 500. 00- 0. 0 3. 520. 00 660. 00 1, 430. 00 0. 00 2, 090. 00 40. 6 0.00 2.240.94 4.885.02 0.00. 4.885.02- 0.0 - -- -- 0. 00 159. 00 159. 00 0. 00 159. 00- 0. 0 934.00 175.02 437.55 0.00 • 496.45 46.8 51, 882. 00 12, 946. 96 31, 411. 57 0. 00 20, 470. 43 60. 5 2. 000. 00 225. 00 4. 491. 69 0. 00 2, 491. I9- 224. 5 - - 2. 000. 00 225. 00 4, 491. 69 0. 00 2, 491. 69- 224. 5 - 1, 440. 00 0. 00 - - - - 0. 00 - - 0. 00 1, 440. 00 0. 0 2. 000. 00 0. 00 1. 474. 00 0. 00 526. 00 . 73. 7 3. 440. 00 0. 00 1, 474. 00 0. 00 1. 966. 00 42. 8 r.. a/ 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 0.00 0.00 499.49 - 0.00 499..49- - 0.0 a7 - 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 14. 215. 00 0. 00 --11, 837. 23 1, 950. 00 427. 77 96. 9 ail OBJECT SUBTOTAL 14, 215. 00 0. 00 12, 336. 72 1, 950. 00 71. 72- 100. 5 ab 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS - 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 7, 560. 00 0. 00 1. 200. 00 0.'00 •6, 360. 00 15. 8 41"OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7, 560. 00 0. 00 1, 200. 00 0. 00 6, 360. 00 15. 8 ae e0 .5 [- DIVISION TOTAL 79.097. 00 13, 171. 96 50, 913. 98 1, 950. 00 26.233. 02 66. 8 r, s, DEPARTMENT TOTAL 79, 097. 00 13. 171. 96 50, 913. 98 '• 1, 950. 00 26.233. 02 66. 8 5e 55 ----- ---- • FUN56 D TOTAL 144. 406. 00 -- - -- 18, 497. 96 -110. 895. 98 - -1, 950. 00 31, 0: 02 78. 1 r bG 37 50 59 • • • • • • 1 2 FINANCE—FA454 TIME 19: 16: 39 12 s 15 78 r 17 10 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND — -2202-HYDRANT UPGRADE -— - DEPT: FIRE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH — EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0049 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 91.0%. OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES -4201 CONTRACT- SERVICE/PRIVATE---- OBJECT SUBTOTAL .2! 24 25 A=� 27 20 —. r, 32 • 34 37 r Zr ra •4'I aU ,_ 4? 4 4e Orli sa 52 63 ea 55 se 57r DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 109, 700.-00 -- — 109, 700. 00 109, 700. 00 109. 700. 00 109, 700. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X 0. 00 -- 7, 495: 63 -- 143, 386. 00 0. 00 7, 495. 63 143, 386. 00 0. 00 7, 495:63 143, 386. 00 0. 00 7, 495. 63---- - - 143, 386. 00 0. 00 7, 495. 63 143, 386. 00 w • • 41. 181. 63_.- - 137. 5' 41, 181. 63— 137. 5 41, 181..63- 41, 181. 63- 41, 181. 63•- 137. 5 137. 5 137. 5 • -I 1 41:[--- FINANCE-FA454 TIME 19:16:39 r8 5 e* 8 ,c r,n 12 r 33 31 r` 32 r . 33 34 35 38 37 r• 33 33 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 705 INSURANCE FUND CITY- OF HERMOSA BEACH ---- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0050 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 DATE 06/14/89 -. 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. .. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 1209 LIABILITY- INS DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102- REGULAR SALARIES/MISC - - 15, 889. 00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 382.00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 382.00 4180 RETIREMENT 2, 434. 00 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2, 444. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 21, 531. 00 1, 529. 74 - - - 13, 855: 04 --- 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 1.017.62 228. 20 1, 215. 75 117. 82 1, 169.•67 1, 875. 76 17, 258. 08 -0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 • 2, 033. 96 382. 00 635. 62- 1,218.25 1, 274. 33 4, 272: 92 87. 1 0. 0 266. 3 49. 9 47. 8 80. 1 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 282, 056. 00 8, 541. 03 ' 290, 042. 68 O. 00 7, 986. 68- 102. 8 -------- - OBJECT - SUBTOTAL---- •-- --- ------ 282, 056700---- - 8, 541. 03 ----- 290, 042.-68---------- O. 00 - 7, 986. 68- 102. 8 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ----500. 00 --- 0. 00 - - 157. 32- -- - 0. 00 342. 68 31. 4 4315 MEMBERSHIP 250.00 0.00 66. 00 O. 00. 184.00 26.4 4316 TRAINING 200.00 119.84 404.84 • 0.00 204.84- 202.4 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE--- 300.00 0.00 -- -- - O. 00 -- 0.00 300.00 0.0 4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 30, 000. 00 117. 60 32, 974. 07 O. 00 2, 974. 07- 109. 9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 31, 250. 00 237. 44 33, 602. 23 • O. 00 2, 352. 23- 107. 5 w DIVISION TOTAL 334, 837. 00 10, 654. 23 1210 AUTO/PROP/BONDS DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES -- --- -- 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 39,025.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 39, 025. 00 w r41 ;z DIVISION TOTAL 39, 025. 00 63 .--- 0 1215 UNEMPLOYMENT DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 40441 -- ---- 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 41 - 4186 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 50,000.00 m OBJECT SUBTOTAL 50, 000. 00 . n A. 51 52 r' 53 54 es bL._.. 53 DIVISION TOTAL 1217 WORKERS COMP 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 50, 000. 00 DEPT:' MGMT/SUPPORT 100. 00 100. 00 340, 902. 99 0. 00 59, 710. 82 59, 710. 82 100. 00 59, 710. 82 752. 49 25, 629. 57 752. 49 25, 629. 57 752. 49 25, 629. 57 20, 891. 00 1, 957. 26 17, 168. 66 • 6, 065. 99- 0. 00 , 20, 685. 82- 0. 00 20, 685. 82- 0. 00 101.8 153. 0 153. 0 20, 685. 62- 153. 0 0. 00 • 24, 370. 43 51. 2 0. 00 • 24, 370. 43 51. 2 0. 00 24, 370. 43 51. 2 0. 00 - 3, 722. 34 82. 1 4 41 A a 3 a h 6 r-- _ FINANCE -F• 4/2 A454 TIME 19:16:39 r"91. 12 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES u - - -- - 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF- 501:00 X14 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 501. 00 15 4180 RETIREMENT 3, 042. 00 5 -- 4182- WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR 210, 675. 00 (' 17 4183 WORKERS COMP PRIOR YR 0. 00 f 19 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3, 622. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL - - - --- - -- 239, 232. 00 9 �.,. 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES n 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PR IVATE ----- 42, 291 '00- .23 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 42. 291. 00 24 zs 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 200.00 07 4316 TRAINING 265.00 28 t OBJECT SUBTOTAL - -- --- - 465. 00 r 29 30 „ DIVISION TOTAL - -- ----- - 281. 988. 00 • 1218 MEDICARE DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 705 INSURANCE FUND -1217 WORKERS COMP CITYOF HERMOSA BEACH • EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0051 FROM 05/01/89 TO 05/31/89 • DATE 06/14/89 • 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT:-- MGMT/SUPPORT �4 e354100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS r 38 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL r,2 DEPARTMENT TOTAL •43I 4e FUND TOTAL 47 as ,` 49 f) 50 51 54 55 55 57 58 r 59 REPORT TOTALS 24, 000. 00 24, 000. 00 - MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 282. 28 14, 943. 00 0. 00 205. 16 17, 387. 70 2. 485. 00 - 2, 485. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 19, 872. 70 2, 393. 22 2, 393. 22 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE - - • 0.00----- 0.00 501.00 0.0 1, 017. 46 0. 00 516. 46- 203. 0 1, 602. 36 0. 00 1, 439. 64 52. 6 177, 875. 83 ----- - 0. 00 32, 799. 17 84. 4 0.-00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 2, 031. 96 0. 00 1, 590.'04 56. 1 199, 696. 27- --- : - 0. 00 39. 535. 73 83. 4 45, 452. 00 w0. 00 46. 22 43. 99 - 90. 21 0. 00 0. 00' 0. 00 245. 238. 48 - • 0. 00 21, 799. 89 21, 799. 89 3, 161. 00- 107. 4 3, 161. 00- 107. 4 153. 78 23. 1 221. 01 16. 6 374. 79 - 19. 4 36, 749. 52 0. 00 2, 200. 11 0. 00 2, 200. 11 86. 9 90. 8 90. 8 24, 000: 00 - - 2. 393. 22 -- -- - - 21, 799. 89------ -- 0. 00 2, 200. 11 90. 8 729. 950. 00 33, 772. 64 693. 281. 75 0. 00 36, 568. R5 94. 9 729, 850. 00 33, 772. 64 693, 281. 75 0. 00 ,36, 568. 25 94. 9 18, 597, 562. 00 1. 318, 189. 09 13, 420, 240. 94 - 291, 220. .55• 4, 886, 100:51 73.7 • CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - MAY 1989 .1 FUND GENERAL NUMBER ACCOUNT 5/1/89 BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENTS WARRANTS ADJUSTMENTS 5/31/89 BALANCE 001 GENERAL $3,006,426.49 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT 1,317,883.74 110 PARKING 270,889.32 115 STATE GAS TAX 407,129.13 120 COUNTY GAS TAX 36,171.74 125 PARK REC.FAC.TAX 642,303.78 126 RAILROAD RT.OF WAY 1,337,653.90 127 6% UTILITY USERS TAX 128,057.72 130 REVENUE SHARING 2,827.74 140 CDBG -0- 145 PROPOSITION A FUND 314,141.99 150 GRANT FUND 97,331.15 155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT 44,230.38 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE 1,565,138.27 170 POLICE ASSET SEIZURE 183,317.90 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 253,157.10 705 SELF INSURANCE FUND 573,155.87 $10,179,816.22 TRUST ACCOUNTS $ 790,632.61 33,912.63 239,527.22 10,063.88 - 0- 10,034.00 74,330.43 111,495.62 - 0- - 0- 15,146.00 - 0- 6,261.25 2,274.02 -0- 7,469.00 - 0- $1,301,146.66 $193,224.41 11,236.81 2,327.71 8,432.35 308.41 5,476.54 11,405.38 1,091.87 24.11 -0- 2,678.50 38,743.88 377.13 82,986.00 1,563.04 6,325.52 21,043.96 $387,245.62 $ 790,033.36 24,821.83 75,411.27 154,891.85 - 0- 1,000.00 - 0- - 0- - 0- - 0- 11,564.74 74.50 4,659.09 15,879.79 13,161.70 - 0- 30,176.86 $1,132,674.99 $111,447.21 2,971.83 118,324.68 6,354.00 - 0- 42,363.00 - 0- 86,829.00 1,590.00 - 0- - 0- - 0- 375.00 2,498.39 5,326.00 1,761.76 -0- 8379,840.87 $ 3,088,802.94 1,335,239.52 319,008.30 264,379.51 36,480.15 614,451.32 1,423,389.71 153,816.21 1,261.85 -0- 309,401.75 136,000.53 45,834.67 1,632,020.11 166,393.24 265,189.86 564,022.97 $10,355,692.64 BALANCE RECEIVED PAID BALANCE STATEMENT BALANCE PAYROLL $9,987,470.16 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $667,637.92 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE $4,480.94 $508,389.97 $508,689.91 $4,181.00 ertrBRU Cgr 'REAS RU ER �� JUNE 22, 1989 )-4r0�` / GENERAL $ 498,974.13 PAYROLL 4,246.07 503,220.20 130,816.72 372,403.48 INACTIVE DEPOSIT 9,987,470.16 BALANCE 10,359,873.64 OUTSTANDING CHECKS 1d(a> June 15, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 27, 1989 RENEWAL OF COUNTY GROUNDS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT OF LANDSCAPED AREAS ADJACENT TO THE LIBRARY Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Authorize the Mayor to sign the renewal agreement with Los Angeles County for the maintenance and upkeep of the landscaped areas adjacent to the public library located 550 Pier Avenue. Background: On February 4, 1969 the City entered into its first agreement with Los Angeles County for the City to perform library grounds maintenance. The contract has been renewed every five years thereafter (July 1 every fifth year). The contract provides for the maintenance and upkeep of landscaping at the public library located on the southwest corner of Pier Avenue and Valley Drive. During the 20 year life of this agreement, the provisions have remained the same. The only change being the amount assessed. Analysis: In the past the maintenance of the landscaped areas adjacent to the library was performed by the Parks Division of the Public Works Department. This was done on a weekly basis. However, this area is now under contract with California Landscape Maintenance. The remainder of this analysis will be divided as follows: 1) Cost to the County for the Previous Five Years 2) Projected Estimated Cost for Next Five Years 3) Summary 1) Cost to the County for the Previous Five Years Amounts due from County: July 1, 1984 $ 4,138 July 1, 1985 $ 4,552 July 1, 1986 $ 5,007 July 1, 1987 $ 5,510 July 1, 1988 $ 6,060 Total (5 year contract) $25,267 Since 1979 it has been customary to increase the yearly fee by approximately 6 to 10%. These figures represented salaries, materials and equipment necessary to fulfill the terms of the contract. b) Project Estimated Cost to the County for Next Five Years Amounts due from County: July 1, 1989 $ 4,517 July 1, 1990 $ 4,788 July 1, 1991 $ 5,075 July 1, 1992 $ 5,380 July 1, 1993 $ 5,703 Total (5 year contract) $25,463 These costs (first year) were calculated as follows with each subsequent year reflecting a 6% increase: Contractor's Base Amount $ 520 In -House 3,276 19% City Administrative Fee 721 $ 4,517 While the contractor is at the site once a week, it is estimated that approximately 3 manhours per week ($16/hr) are required of City workers. These manhours are spent in weekly inspections, irrigation checks and repairs, sweeping, watering and litter pick up. Also taken into consideration in determining these costs was an additional 1-1/2 hours per week ($10/hr) for equipment use. c) Summary The above represents an approximate 25% decrease in cost to the County for the next fiscal year as opposed to FY 1988-89 and also an estimated 25% decrease in revenue to the City for this same period of time or $1,540. The projected five year agreement, monetarily, will result in a net gain of $196 over the previous five year agreement. Beause the City is allowed to only recover "costs reasonably borne", the new cost estimate is justified and the cost savings should be passed on to the County. Respectfully subigitted erelyn VJnole Administrative Aide Concur: Concur: ony Antich Director of Public Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator Attachments: Copy of Agreement January 23, 1989 Letter from Los Angeles County April 4, 1989 Letter to Los Angeles County 2 1989. GROUNDS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT NO. THIS AGREEMENT entered into this day of , BY AND BETWEEN COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY," AND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", W ITN E 8 8 E T H: THAT, WHEREAS, the COUNTY is desirous of contracting with the CITY for the maintenance of the grounds of County Buildings located in said CITY at 550 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach; WHEREAS, the CITY is agreeable to rendering such services on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, such contract is authorized and provided for by the provisions of Section 56-1/4 of the Charter of the County of Los Angeles and Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 5, (Sections 6500 et seq.) of the Government Code. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and promises contained hereinbelow, it is mutually agreed by the parties hereto as follows: 1. In consideration for maintenance and services, County agrees to pay to City the sum of $25,463.00. Payments shall be paid on demand in the following manner: July 1, 1989 July 1, 1990 July 1, 1991 July 1, 1992 July 1, 1993 $4,517.00 4,788.00 5,075.00 5,380.00 5,703.00 $ 25,463.00 2. This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 1989 and terminate on June 30, 1994. 3. CITY will maintain in good and workmanlike manner the grounds of the COUNTY buildings located at above listed location(s), said maintenance to consist of mowing and edging grassed areas, pruning of shrubs, cultivation of flower beds, application of water, furnishing and applying insecticides and fertilizer. 1 4. For the purpose of performing said grounds maintenance, CITY shall furnish and supply all necessary labor, supervision, equipment and supplies necessary to maintain the grounds at a level of appearance comparable to CITY facilities. Such maintenance shall include the renovation and seeding of lawn areas at least once during the year and the repair or replacement of sprinkler heads as needed. 5. COUNTY may replace, at its discretion, all plants, shrubs, and trees upon notification of such need from the CITY. CITY shall not alter the landscape in any manner not otherwise provided for herein. 6. COUNTY shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salaries, wages, or other compensation to any CITY personnel performing services hereunder for said COUNTY. 7. CITY shall indemnify and hold COUNTY harmless from any liability arising from or in any way connected with any activity performed by CITY pursuant to this Agreement or resulting from a dangerous or defective condition of property subject to this Agreement existing by reason of any act or omission by the CITY or its agents or employees. COUNTY shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any liability arising from or in any way connected with any activity performed by County in operating said library, resulting from a dangerous or defective condition of property subject to this Agreement existing by reason of any act or omission by the County, or its agents or employees. 8. Either party shall have the right to cancel this Agreement at any time after June 30, 1990 by giving 30 days' prior written notice. In the event of such cancellation, CITY shall return to COUNTY the prorata portion of each annual payment prepaid by County with such proration computed on the basis of a 365 day year. 9. This Agreement shall not be valid and of any force and effect and does not impose any obligation upon the County unless and until _funds are appropriated by the County for the purposes set forth herein. 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed upon the day and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH By By City Clerk Mayor (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ByclfuttILL`cidt City Attorney ATTEST: LARRY MONTEILTH Executive Officer -Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By Deputy APPROVED AS TO FORM: DEWITT W. CLINTON County Counsel By Deputy: LS:jpc 38 (mgrndhb) 6/8/89 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES By 3 Chairman, Board of Supervisors U_ N I Y 014 LU Aiv I L L 'I..3 MANAGEMENT DEPAR _ �v.ENT South Vermont Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90020 RtcriveO J,44r 2 6 1989 AG -/✓ t, OF/4j.. yer, City Manager each 90254 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 550 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH ed Grounds Maintenance Agreement will expire t your City submit a proposed estimate of costs or maintaining the grounds of the subject oposal should provide annual cost estimates per s. ny questions or require additional information, is office at (213) 738-2300. ve Officer narl3eacl_fftt osa Beach, California 90254-3885 Agent 90254 -th reference to been prepared: current contract subsequent year to the fact that a by outside a for the City. s on to the t Anthony Antich, June 19, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 27, 1989 REQUEST TO AMEND POSITION ALLOCATION PLAtLTO DELETE ONE ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE POSITION AND ADD ONE CLERKS TYPIST POSITION IN THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, BUSINESS LICENSE DIVISION Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City•Founcil amend the position al- location plan to eliminate one Administrative Aide position and add one Clerk Typist position in the Business License Division of the Building Department. Background: The Business License Division is currently allocated one (1) Business License Inspector position and one (1) Administrative Aide position. The Administrative Aide position became vacant when the incumbent was promoted to the position of Business License Inspector. Fol- lowing that promotion, the Department conducted a review of the duties to•be assigned to the position. As a result of that re- view, it has been determined that the current requirements of the position make it aptpropriate at this time to change the Depart- ment's position alloy ation plan as recommended above. Analysis: Section 2-14 (4) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code allows the City Manager to recommend to the City Council the reorganization of positions in the competitive service. The review of this position indicates that the duties assigned can be accomplished at a lower level of the clerical classifica- tion hierarchy then Administrative Aide. The Administrative Aide classification independently performs the more complex clerical and typing work requiring specialized knowledge. The Depart- ments' analysis indicates that, with a reorganization of respon- sibilities, the duties of the position will not require that level of independence. Many of the tasks have been made routine and can be accomplished within defined policies and procedures. Following Council approval of this change, an appointment will be made to this vacant position from an existing certified eligibility list. The change from Administrative Aide to Clerk Typist will result in a first year savings of $5,200. Respectfully submit Ami Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Concur: // Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager lg June 15, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council June 27, 1989 INTERNATIONAL SURF FESTIVAL - PARKING [WAIVER RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the *City Council waive the parking fees for participants during the Surf Festival events on July 28 and July 29, 1989. BACKGROUND Once every four years the City of Hermosa Beach is host city with nighttime events and we are expected to provide parking for participants and VIP's for these events. A similar request has been made of City Council in the past years and the request has been approved. ANALYSIS The areas to be reserved are: 11th Street all meters west of Hermosa Avenue (40) and 13th Street sauthside meters west of Hermosa Avenue (20) from 5:00 p.m. to midnight, Friday and Saturday (July 28 and 29th); the Biltmore site (for boats, etc.); parking lot F, all spaces (20) and 13th Street northside meters west of Hermosa Avenue (20) from 4:00 p.m. to midnight. The amount of lost revenue to the City is estimated to be $420. The Surf Festival has been a joint City tradition for over 25 years and each city, Torrance, Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach has waived parking fees whenever they are the host City. • Alana Mastrian-Handman Director Dept. of Commun ,ty Respurces evin B. Nor hcrt City Manager t 4Vd an JoNoon, Director General Services Respectfully submitted, Marsha Ernst Administrative Aide Dept. of Community Resources lh June 20, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 27, 1989 UPDATE, ACQUISITION OF GREENBELT The Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority (ICLFA) approved the City's application for membership at the board meeting of June 1, 1989. Councilmember Jim Rosenberger attended the meeting. Each of the eleven member cities must now adopt a resolution for membership to be effective. Mr. Mark Northcross, the finanical advisor for ICLFA, has been working to put together a group of cities for a "designated pool" which would allow a savings on upfront costs and expedite the process of issuing certificates of participation. As of June 19, he does have at least two other cities willing to commit to the pool: Vernon, with an issue of $2.5 million for Civic Center expansion and Lynwood, with an issue of $1.3 million for possible city yard expansion or other improvements. There is also a possibility that the City of San Fernando may participate, but the formation of the pool can go forward with just the three cities regardless of their decision. Mr. Northcross is forwarding a packet of documents (lease, trust agreement, resolution, official statement) for review. It appears that action by City Council to participate in the pool may be possible at either the July 25th or August 8th meeting. Concur: 1Kevin B. ort cra t City Manager VC/kc Viki Copland Finance Administrator 1i s.. Mayor and Members of the City Council CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES June 19 1989 City Council Meeting June 27, 1989 The following claim(s) have been submitted to the City Clerk's office: Kevin D. Berry - c/o Richard Berry 205 Calle de Madrid, Redondo Beach, filed June 12, 1989; alleged injury sus- tained from collision between pedestrian and motorcycle. Richard J. Kenny - 520 Paseo de los Reyes, Redondo Beach; filed June 15, 1989; alleged injury of bicyclist on bike path Recommendation: To deny claim(s) and refer to City's Claims Administrator. Note: The above claim(s) are available for review in the office of the City Clerk. Concur: ND e/f/Lcy/ et/ i J L RIDDLE, Dep y City Clerk 1j J.lAbILITY Litt :Am.:1LN r LUut: 2 el MAIL TO: CITY CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PROPE City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 �PAESTO: 24-44 I 1. Claims for death. injury to persons, or to personal property, must be Med not later than six (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than one (1) year after the occ 3. Read entire claim before filing. 4. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. Name of Clai 1 (First, Last, Middle) of Claint ( r= =t, Ci £vi" b- Stale. Zip) a 000— gl�i �. Business Address of Claimant (Street, City, State. Zip) JONj Fav t hs e89rr e (Gov. Co3oc. Address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: vrl a- QEwZ.r - 2K c•4444 Telephone No Telephone o. ( 1 ".4~1), 'tau.ro•- id. 964.17 Date of Oamage/Loss/Injury itt►t! --G 0-P1 .,„„,..._ Time MI, A.M. P.M. Place of Damage/Loss/lnjury A 111it " 4m Pc 14 How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be specific) C 1•,4'0.4" 01,441 ei. ev. cow citilias wilt- ,�- 9 (141. , n vim. •.sem 04,ovt ofolt 04.41 k -gra 4scc 7720"- iifiseftAt. a it) 14;4 *- 4 *n.,,#(2J..*'. Were Police at scene? Yes ieNoO Were Paramedics at scene? Yes V. Nod Report No. 1.4)., �q �; r 3 What particular act or omission do you claim caused the damage/loss/injury?. 0 77't6,2,...4i1 rf EvTE04-4t i S' AI ae4,4, t- 1t.p /2.44)1l1/ Name of City employee(s) causing the damage/loss/injury: ion,iFc((E.Li Is total amou�t�f�rgur claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, ess than $10,000.00 If so, state the amount 0 more than $25,000.00 damage, or Toss: (Superior Court Jurisdiction) ii -l°,' J •' 0 more than $10,000.00 but Tess than $25,000.00 (Municipal Court Jurisdiction) How was amount of claim computed? (Be specific. List doctor bills, wage rate, repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2) estimates. 9 G 0-0 . CI .. 74 ✓÷ L A -a ci.4-t."7, t it► „ taxa-- 7044. Us.tivae..f.. fr - *fit Expenditures made because of damage/loss/injury (Date and Item). THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE. Expenditures made because of damage/loss/injury (Date and item) Pitt (r it)/ 14i c d r•ek— GeK444‘ • Name and address of witness(es), doctor(s), and hospital(s): • PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY. For all vehicle damage claims, draw a diagram with the names of streets, and indicate place of incident by 'X' and by show- ing house numbers or distances to street corners. If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter 'A' location of City Vehicle and by 'B' location of yourself or your vehicle. If Personal or property damage claim please identify location as completely as possible. N CLAIMS INVOLVING VEHICLES w • • • S A v. 1 b t • • frApf 1 CLAIMS - OTHER (Please draw diagram) I HAVE READ THE FOREGOING CLAIM AND KNOW THE CONTENTS THEREOF: AND CERTIFY THAT THE SAME IS TRUE OF MY OWN KNOWLEDGE EXCEPT AS TO THOSE MATTERS WHICH ARE HEREIN STATED UPON MY INFORMATION AND BELIEF: AND AS TO THOSE MATTERS I BELIEVE IT TO BE TRUE. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. Dated Signed X— NOTE: PRESENTATION OF A FALSE CLAIM IS PUNISHABLE AS A FELONY (CAL. PEN. CODE 72). MAIL TO: .: Sq _o 40.3 LIABILITY L... ��„>r : aloe) CITY CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PRO City Clerk COPIES TO: City of Hermosa Beach 'o/1`f /L.t.44 1315 Valley Drive P.. v Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 1. Claims for death, injury to persons, or to personal propertt. Must be filed not later than six (6 (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than one (1) year after the occurren 3. Read entire claim before filing. 4. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. Name o1 Claimant (First. Last, Middle) Richard Kenny Joseph Age 56 Home Address of Claimant (Street. City. State. Zip) 520 Paseo de los Reyes, Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Telephone No. 1213) 378-0600 Business Address of Claimant (Street. City, State. Zip) 9528 Telstar Avenue, El Monte, CA 91731 Telephone No. (818) 575-6844 Address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: 520 Paseo de los Reyes, Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Date of Oamage/Loss/lnjury March 22, 1989 Time A.M. 5:30 P.M. Place of Damage/Loss/Injury Bike Path 1016 Strand Hermosa Beach How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be specific) I was knocked off my bike by a roller blade skater speeding on the wrong side of the bike path. Were Police at scene? Yes Li NoO Were Paramedics at scene? Yes IX NoO Report No. N/A What particular act or omission do you claim caused the dama elloss/Injury? The City of Hermosa Bach does not have a..ro•riate re: ations and/or ••lice enforcement/ administration for in ii, accident documentation to protect or warn bikers of the extremel h1az1ardous conditions for bikers (Vere ttf catty emploeee(-causin he,da agiellos in)uery Ch. D1 e .et • odd -21211 bike $eareres e tnoa tdo�e is sutn t - Is the total amount of your claim. including the estimated amount of any cirlosrieciaii injury, O Tess than $10,000.00 If so, state the amount M more than $25,000.00 damage, or Toss: (Superior Court Jurisdiction) O more than $10,000.00 but less than $25,000.00 (Municipal Court Jurisdiction) How was amount of claim computed? (Be specific. List doctor bills, wage rate, repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2) estimates. Payments to others for needed work for 3 months which I would have done myself if uninjured. House and yard $bW, auto repairs (transmissions [2J $800, air cond. D5W, brakes$200)=$2100 Bike replacement= 550 $2650 Expenditures made because of damage/loss/injury (Date and Item). April - June 1989 pain and suffering$25,000 Total $27650 THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE. Expenditures made because of damage/loss/injury (Date and item) $2.650 Name and address of witness(es), doctor(s), and hospital(s)• Konnie Kenny - Redondo Beach Dr. Max Moses- Kaiser Hospital, Harbor City PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY. For all vehicle damage claims, draw a diagram with the names of streets, and indicate place of incident by 'X' and by show- ing house numbers or distances to street corners. If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter 'A' location of City Vehicle and by 'B' location of yourself or your vehicle. If Personal or property damage claim please identify location as completely as possible. N CLAIMS INVOLVING VEHICLES w s W.7-Ltr_ v yzw/p /#LVQ 7.y/W NN.t\�\`N\N\\\\1\t\\ \ \\\\`NtV• CLAIMS - OTHER (Please draw diagram) I HAVE READ THE FOREGOING CLAIM AND KNOW THE CONTENTS THEREOF: AND CERTIFY THAT THE SAME IS TRUE OF MY OWN KNOWLEDGE EXCEPT AS TO THOSE MATTERS WHICH ARE HEREIN STATED UPON MY INFORMATION AND BELIEF: AND AS TO THOSE MATTERS I BELIEVE IT TO BE TRUE. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. Dated %/e/A/E /94579 Signed ,e4.44.(00 NOTE: PRESENTATION OF A FALSE CLAIM IS PUNISHABLE AS A FELONY (CAL. PEN. CODE 72). June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting June 27, 1989 Mayor and Members of the City Council EXTENSION OF CONTRACT FOR PUBLICATION OF CITY ADVERTISING - LEGAL AND DISPLAY ADS - JULY 1, 1989 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1993 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council extend the current contract for City advertising (Legal and Display Ads) with the Easy Reader newspaper for a period of three years commencing July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1993. The yearly increase in the advertising costs is 5% per year. Background The term of the current advertising contract with the Easy Reader expires on June 30, 1989. At the City Council meeting of May 23, 1989, staff was directed to negotiate a three year extension with the Easy Reader. They have agreed to an extension for three years, with a 5% increase each year. The idea of publishing a condensed version of the City Council agenda was discussed with the Easy Reader. Since the agenda is is not in final form until Thursday, it would not be possible to publish an accurate agenda on the Thursday before the Tuesday meeting. The City Manager has suggested that instead we attempt to have the Cable TV access channel run an agenda, and the city liaison should pursue this idea. This is consistent with the City Council goal of improving the public policy process. Concur: raft, City Manager `.4/42e,(A.L.) Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk . 1 k 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONTRACT FOR SERVICES PUBLISHED CITY ADVERTISING - LEGAL AND DISPLAY THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 1989 by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH hereinafter referred to as "City", and THE EASY READER NEWSPAPER hereinafter referred to as "Contractor". ARTICLE 1. TERM OF CONTRACT Section 1.01. This agreement will become effective on July 1, 1989 and will continue in effect to June 30, 1993, unless sooner terminated. ARTICLE 2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR Section 2.01. Contractor agrees to perform the services specified in the "Description of Services" attached to this agreement as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. Section 2.02. Contractor agrees to furnish copy for proofing prior to publication, five free copies of all news- papers containing advertising matter, and also furnish free all affidavits of publications required by said city showing the date of publication of such advertising matter. Section 2.03. All publications shall be published in the first publication of the paper published after receipt of copy, and succeeding publications, unless otherwise directed. Contractor must be responsible for the correct publication of all legal advertising and in case of error or omission (which is not according to copy as furnished by said city) shall republish said matter affected thereby free of charge to the city. /// Section 2.04. A bond in the sum of $1,000.00 for the faithful performance of the contract will be required from the Contractor. Said bond shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form. ARTICLE 3. COMPENSATION Section 3.01. In consideration for the services to be performed by Contractor, City agrees to pay Contractor accord- ing to the rate as described in Exhibit "A". Contractor shall be paid as soon as possible after receipt of billing, but in no event later than 30 days from said date. ARTICLE 4. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT Section 4.01. This agreement shall continue in force until June 30, 1993, and shall thereupon terminate. Section 4.02. This agreement shall terminate automatically on the occurance of any of the following events: 1) Bankruptcy or insolvency of either party; 2) Termination of City as a public entity; 3) Assignment of this agreement by Contractor. Section 4.03. Should Contractor default in the performance of this agreement or materially breach any of its provisions, City, at City's option, may terminate this agreement by giving written notification to Contractor. For the purpose of this section, material breach of agreement shall include, but not be limited to, the failure to perform the services described in the attached "Description of Services". // // // 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 4.04. Should City fail to pay Contractor all or any part of the compensation set forth in Exhibit "A" of this agreement on the date due, Contractor, at Contractor's option, may terminate this agreement if the failure is not remedied by City within thirty (30) days from the date payment is due. ARTICLE 5. GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 5.01. This agreement supersedes any and all agree- ments, either oral or written, between the parties hereto with respect to the rendering of services by Contractor for City and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of such services in any manner whatsoever. Section 5.02. If any provision in this agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way. Section 5.03. If any action at law or in equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, which may be set by the court in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled. Section 5.04. This agreement will be governed by and con- strued in accordance with the laws of the State of California. // // 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the within Agreement at Hermosa Beach, California, on the date and year first written above. ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: (211;ItAL2_ v City Attorney CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH By Mayor CONTRACTOR By 4 EXHIBIT "A" CONTRACT FOR SERVICES PUBLISHED CITY ADVERTISING - LEGAL AND DISPLAY The Contractor will print and publish in the Easy Reader Newspaper, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Hermosa Beach, all publications of advertising of all kinds required to be published by said City, for the period of July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1993 at the following prices: LEGAL ADS From and including July 1, 1989 to and including June 30, 1990, at the following prices: At the rate of $6.30 per column inch for the first insertion At the rate of $5.80 per column inch for each subsequent insertion. From and including July 1, 1990 to and including June 30, 1991, at the following prices: At the rate of $6.60 per column inch for the first insertion At the rate of $6.10 per column inch for each subsequent insertion. From and including July 1, at the following prices: At the rate of $6.90 per At the rate of $6.40 per insertion. DISPLAY ADS From and including July 1, at the following prices: At the rate of $7.00 per square inches. At the rate of $6.50 per insertion. From and including July 1, the following prices: At the rate of $7.35 per square inches. At the rate of $6.85 per insertion. From and including July 1, the following prices: At the rate of $7.70 per square inches. At the rate of $7.20 per insertion. 1991 to and including June 30, 1992, column inch for the first insertion column inch for each subsequent 1989 to and including June 30, 1990, column inch for not less than 12 column inch for each subsequent 1990 to and including June 30, 1991 at column inch for not less than 12 column inch for each subsequent 1991 to and including June 30, 1992 at column inch for not less than 12 column inch for each subsequent 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 •15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1989.. WHEREAS, Section 10012 of the Elections Code of the State of California provides that the governing body of any local. agency adopt regulations pertaining to materials' prepared by any candidate for a municipal election, including costs of the candidate statement; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. That pursuant to Section 10012 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at an Election to be held in the City of Hermosa Beach on November 7, 1989 may prepare a candidate's statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. The statement may include the name, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief description of no more than 200 words of the candidate's education and qualifications expressed by the candidate himself or herself. The.•statement shall not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor member- ship or activity in partisan political organizations. The statement shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk at the time the candidate's nomination papers are filed. The statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing nomination papers and until 5:00 p.m. of the next working day after the close of the nomination period. SECTION 2. SPANISH LANGUAGE. The City Clerk shall provide, at the candidate's expense, a Spanish translation of candidate's statements upon request. 11 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 •15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS. No candidate will be permitted to include additional materials in the sample ballot package. ' • SECTION 4. PAYMENT. The City Clerk .shall 'estimate the.: total cost of printing, handling, translating, and mailing the candidate's statements filed pursuant to the Election Code, and require each candidate filing a statement to pay'in advance his or her pro rata share as a condition of having his or her state- ment included in the voter's pamphlet. The City Clerk shall bill each candidate for any cost in excess of the deposit or shall refund within 30 days of the election any unused portion of the deposit. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall provide each can- didate or the candidate's representative a copy of this Resolu- tion at the time nominating petitions are issued. SECTION 6. That this resolution shall be in effect upon adoption. SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27RD DAY OF JUNE, 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: aaloyd.44L Jv City Clerk City Attorney June 20, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 27, 1989 ACCEPT WORK AS COMPLETE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS - VARIOUS LOCATIONS CIP 85-138 Recommendations: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Accept as complete CIP 85-138, Traffic Signal Improvements - Various Locations constructed by Steiny and Company, Inc. 2. Authorize staff to: a) Release the lump sum payment to Steiny and Company, Inc. b) Release Steiny and Company, Inc. from the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Materials Bond. 3. Not assess liquidated damages in the amount of $400. 4. Authorize staff to file a Notice of Completion. 5. Accept as complete, inspection and administration services provided by Mohle, Grover & Associates. Background: On June 14, 1988, City Council awarded a contract to Steiny and Company, Inc. in a not -to -exceed amount of $157,190 for construction of traffic signal and/or street lighting improvements at the follow- ing locations: a) Hermosa Avenue at 2nd Street b) Hermosa Avenue at 3rd Street c) Hermosa Avenue at 11th Street d) Hermosa Avenue at Pier Avenue e) Aviation Boulevard at Prospect Avenue f) Valley/Ardmore Avenue at Pier Avenue Analysis: This section is divided as follows: 1. Construction A. Plans and Specifications B. Construction Schedule C. Release of Bonds D. Final Contract Cost 2. Inspection lm 1. Construction A. Plans and Specifications The project has been built according to the plans and specifications prepared by Mohle, Grover & Associates (MGA), municipal and transportation_sngineers, and approved by Council. MGA also has inspected the project for compliance with the design and has provided written Certification of Compliance. B. Construction Schedule Steiny and Company, Inc. was given the Notice to Proceed effective November 14, 1988. The project specifications stipulated 90 working days for completion but work was suspended during the holidays (Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year's) and for two bad weather days which extended the completion date to May 12, 1989. All major work items were completed prior to the scheduled comple- tion date and within two days after the scheduled com- pletion, the work was 100 percent complete. This minor delay did not cause any financial impact. The contract specified liquidated damages in the amount of $200 per day for any actual financial damages. C. Release of Bonds Pending City Council authorization, and after the Notice of Completion is recorded, staff will release Steiny and Company, Inc. from the obligations of the following Faith- ful Performance Bond and Labor and Materials Bond: Bonding Company: Safeco Original Bond Amount: Amount to be Released: Bond No.: D. Final Contract Cost Insurance Company of America $142,900.00 $142,900.00 -} 5237682 Below is a summary of construction contract costs: Original Contract Amount $142,900.00 C.C.O. #1 - Remobilization after the Holidays 904.62 C.C.O. #2 - Controller Relocation at Hermosa & Pier Intersection 1,908.74 C.C.O. #3 Crosswalk Modifications at Valley/Ardmore/Pier 1,265.00 Contract Amount not to exceed $157,190. Total $146,978.36 r It is recommended that liquidated damages in the amount of $400 for completing work two days late not be assessed due to no actual financial impacts. 2 Inspection On June 14, 1988, Council awarded a contract to Mohle, Grover & Associates in an amount not to exceed $17,600. MGA inspected the construction of the signal modifications. MGA identified items that required correction. Staff has inspected the work and concurs with MGA. MGA has recommended filing a Notice of Completion. Fiscal Impact: Below is a summary of project costs: Final Amount Not to Exceed Contract Budgeted Amount Amount FY 88-89 Design* $ 31,800 $ 29,136 -0- Construction 157,190 146,978 $173,800 Inspection & Administration 17,600 16,000** 17.600 Total $206,590 $192,114 $191,400 *A11 design costs were incurred prior to FY 88-89. **Inspection and administration costs are estimated. Below is an estimate of the 86.22% reimbursement from the Federal - Aid Urban Grant as administered by Caltrans: Total Project Cost $192,114 Amount Eligible for Reimbursement 165.641 Balance Paid from State Gas Tax Fund $ 26,473 This project was funded using a Federal -Aid Urban grant. After acceptance, staff will pursue the grant reimbursement. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to Council are: 1. Assess liquidated damages. Respectfully submitted: Brian Gengler Assistant Engineer Concur: evin Northers$ City Manager Concur: Ant ony Antich Director of Publ Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator June 15, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City Council Meeting of June 27, 1989 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR CDBG PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council award the contract for Technical Assistance for the CDBG Program to Mark Briggs & Associates in an amount not to exceed $12,000 and to authorize the Mayor to sign the attached Agreement on behalf of the City; and advance $122,762 from the Park & Recreation Facility Tax Fund into the CDBG Budget. BACKGROUND On March 28, 1989, the City Council approved the CDBG Program per the following: Housing Rehabilitation @ $92,072; Public Service Programs @ $18,414 and Administration @ $12,276 for a total of $122,762. ANALYSIS Per CDBG regulations, the City developed an RFP for Technical Services for a firm to assist the City in carrying out the CABG Program. The RFP was mailed to six agencies with two responding. Both proposals are on file in the Community Resources office. Jack K. Bryant & Associates, Inc. This firm submitted a bid of $1,200 per week or $62,400 per year. The proposal was very general and "boiler plate" in terms of what the company could do. It was not at all specific to the City of Hermosa Beach and there was no effort on the part of the company to find out the parameters for this project. Mark Briggs & Associates, Inc. This firm was hired by the City several months ago to assist in the City re-entering the CDBG Program. The firm has been extremely knowledgeable in CDBG guidelines and has worked very well with staff in getting the City back into the program. Their bid of $12,000 falls within the amount of funds available from the City's CDBG allotment to cover Administrative costs. Therefore no city funds will need to be expended to cover the Administration of this program. The firm will provide technical assistance in carrying out the program and one City staff person will coordinate and act as the over-all administrator for the program. 1ii The advance that is requested in the recommendation is merely a "loan" from the Parks & Recreation Facility Tax Fund. This money will be reimbursed to that fund as the County reimburses the City for expenditures made on behalf of the CDBG Program. Concur: Sevin B. or craft City Manager 2 Respflctfully submitted, 15/("( Alana Mastrian-Handman Assistant City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: iki Copeland Finance Administrator AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 1989, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "City") and Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc., a California corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Briggs"). RECITALS A. City desires technical assistance and implementation management for its 1988- 89 Community Development Block Grant Program. B. City further desires assistance with monitoring of its housing and public service programs and administrative requirements. C. Briggs is a consultant in community and economic development, and has the expertise to provide the City with the desired consulting services. D. Briggs has submitted a Work Program attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference incorporated herein. Pursuant to which, Briggs has offered to provide the consultant services desired by the City. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. TERM Briggs will provide consulting services in accordance with the work program as set forth in their proposal and attached hereto as Exhibit A, to begin July 1, 1989 and continue through June 30, 1990. 2. COMPENSATION As full compensation for the aforesaid services, City agrees to pay and Briggs agrees to accept an amount not to exceed $12,000, to be billed on time and materials based on the following hourly rates and overhead: Principal I $ 41.97/hour Principal II $ 39.14/hour Secretary $ 12.26/hour Overhead at 2.0 times the hourly rate for each staff position. These allocations of costs are based on actual salaries paid Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc., officers and employees, overhead percentages based on fiscal year and financial statements prepared by the firm's CPA and are consistent with the Community Development Block Grant guidelines and Office of Management and Budgeget Circulars A-102 and A-87. 3. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT FOR CAUSE If, through any cause, any party shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this contract, or if either party shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this contract, either party shall thereupon have the right to terminate this contract by giving written notice of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least ten (10) days before the effective date of such termination. In such event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports prepared by Briggs under this contract shall, at the option of the City, become its property and Briggs shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed hereunder. Notwithstanding the above, Briggs shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of the contract by Briggs, and the City may withhold any payments to Briggs for the purpose of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the City from Briggs is determined. 2 4. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE Either party may terminate this contract at any time by giving at least ten (10) days notice in writing to the other party. If the contract is terminated by the City as provided herein, Briggs will be paid for the time provided and expenses incurred up to the termination date. If this contract is terminated due to the fault of Briggs, paragraph 3 hereof relative to termination shall apply. 5. CHANGES The City may, from time to time, request changes in the scope of the services of Briggs to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of Briggs' compensation„ which are mutually agreed upon by and between the City and Briggs, shall be incorporated in written amendments to this contract. 6. NOTICES Whenever notices are required to be given pursuant to the provisions of this agreement, the same shall be given by personal service or by depositing the same in the course of transmission of the United States Postal Service, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: (a) City: (b) Briggs: City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Bryon K. Baron Senior Vice President Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc. 505 N. Tustin Avenue Suite 282 Santa Ana, California 92705 7. PERSONNEL a. Briggs represents that it has, or will secure as its own expense, all personnel required in performing the services under this contract. Such 3 personnel shall not be employees, officers or agents of or have any contractual relationship with the City. b. All of the services required hereunder will be performed by Briggs or under its supervision and all personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized or permitted under state and local law to perform such services. c. None of the work or services covered by this contract shall be subcontracted without the prior written approval of the City. Any work or services subcontracted hereunder shall be specified by written contract or agreement and shall be subject to each provision of this contract. 8. ASSSIGNABILITY Briggs shall not assign any interest in this contract, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation), without the City's prior written consent, provided, however, that claims for money by Briggs from the City under this contract may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution without such approval. Written notice of any such assignment or transfer shall be furnished promptly to the City. 9. REPORTS AND INFORMATION Briggs, at such times and in such forms as the City may require, shall furnish the City such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this contract, the costs and obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters covered by this contract. 10. RECORDS AND AUDITS Briggs shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to 4 the contract and such other records as may be deemed necessary by the City to assure proper accounting for all project funds, both Federal and non -Federal shares. These records will be made available for audit purposes to the City or any authorized representative, and will be retained for five years after the expiration of this contract unless permission to destroy them is granted by the City. 11. FINDINGS CONFIDENTIAL All of the reports, information, data, etc., prepared or assembled by Briggs under this contract are confidential and Briggs agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City. 12. COPYRIGHT No report, maps, or other documents produced in whole or in part under this contract shall be the subject of an application for copyright by or on behalf of Briggs. 13. COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL LAWS Briggs shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of the State and local governments, and Briggs shall save the City harmless with respect to any damages arising from any tort done in performing any of the work embraced by this contract. 14. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY During the performance of this contract, Briggs agrees as follows: a. Briggs will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, creed, sex, color or national origin. Briggs will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their 5 race, creed, sex, color or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; lay-off or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. Briggs agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided by the City setting forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause. b. Briggs will, in all solicitation or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of Briggs, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, creed, color, sex, or national origin. c. Briggs will cause the foregoing provision to be inserted in all subcontractors for any work covered by this contract so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor, provided that the foregoing provisions shall not apply to contracts or subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials. d. Briggs will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. e. Briggs will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by the rules, regulations and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to its books, records and accounts by the City's Department of Community Development and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations and orders. 6 f. In the event of Briggs' noncompliance with the equal opportunity clauses of this Agreement or with any of such rules, regulations or orders, this Agreement may be cancelled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and Briggs may be declared ineligible for further government contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sactions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by Law. g. Briggs will include the provisions of paragraphs (a) through (g) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. Briggs will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the City's Department of Community Development may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for non-compliance. Provided, however, that in the event Briggs becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the City, Briggs may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 15. CIVIL RIGHT ACT OF 1964 Under Title VI of the Civil Right Act of 1964, no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. Briggs shall comply with Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, and Section 3 compliance in the provision of training, employment and business opportunities. 7 16. INTEREST OF MEMBERS OF A CITY No member of the governing body of the City and no other officer, employee, or agent of the City who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection iwht the planning and carrying out of the program, shall have any personnel financial interest, direct or indirect, in this contract; and Briggs shall take appropriate steps to assure compliance. 17. INTEREST OF OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICIALS No member of the governing body of the locality and no other public official of such locality, who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and carrying out of the program, shall have any personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in this contract; and Briggs shall take appropriate steps to assure compliance. 18. INTEREST OF BRIGGS AND EMPLOYEES Briggs convenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire interest, direct or indirect, in the City or any parcel therein or any other interest which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of his services hereunder. Briggs further covenants that in the performance of this contract, no person having such interest shall be employed. 19. HOLD HARMLESS Briggs agrees that City shall not be liable for injury or damage to person or property that should be occasioned or caused by any act or omission of Briggs or its members, officers and employees, or any organization Briggs should be associated with in the furtherance of this Agreement, and that it will hold the City, its officers and employees, harmless from liability thereon, and will defend the same in respect to any claim or legal action that might ensue as a result of such injury or damange. 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MARK BRIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC. A Municipal Corporation A California Corporation BY BY ITS and MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: 0 IL 1.0 CITY ATTORNEY cntrt 16/6189 9 BY ITS rPAhu �-� 14?)1111 EXHIBIT A 1989-90 CDBG WORK PROGRAM 1. Assist City with preparation of Annual CDBG Draft and Final "Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds", related City Council staff reports, and public notices. Assist City with preparation of forms and exhibits required by County. 2. Assist City with preparation of Annual Grantee Performance Report. 3. Assist City with preparation of other occasional reports required by HUD or the County. 4. Assist City with preparation of amendments of CDBG projects and budgets, and assist in implementation of program changes. S. Provide assistance with preparation of news releases, program brochures and other publicity and marketing materials, as necessary. 6. Assist with the monitoring of non-profit agencies receiving City CDBG funds to insure that they are in compliance with City, HUD and CDC requirements. 7. Provide technical support to City staff in conjunction with program monitoring and audits conducted by HUD and Los Angeles County. 8. Assist with any appropriate amendments to program implementation plans. 9. Provide ongoing technical assistance with CDBG program regulations requirements. 10. Provide any appropriate technical assistance for community and economic development activities. 11. Attend City Council and other scheduled hearings and meetings concerning CDBG program activities. 12. Provide input to the City on other available Federal and State programs as possible funding sources to meet CDBG related or other community needs. cntrtl6/6189 10 June 20, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 27, 1989 REJECT BIDS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL PRE-EMPTION CIP 86-176 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Reject all bids for this project. 2. Re -consider after Caltrans project. Background: On January 24, 1989 City Council approved plans and specifi- cations and authorized staff to advertise for bids for CIP 86-176. On March 14, 1989 City Council rejected the bids and authorized staff to readvertise because the bids were higher than the engineer's estimate. This project will install devices on traffic signals allowing emergency vehicles to pass through from any direction on a green signal at the following intersections on Pacific Coast Highway at 2nd Street, 5th Street, 8th Street, Aviation Boulevard, Pier Avenue and 21st Street. Redondo Beach, Manhattan Beach and El Segundo have installed the devices and installation in Hermosa Beach is needed to complete the system along Pacific Coast Highway. The City of Hermosa Beach has already installed the device at Aviation and Prospect as part of the traffic signal upgrade project. Analysis: This analysis is divided into the following sections: 1. The Bids 2. Reason for Rejecting Bids. 1. The Bids On March 14, 1989, two bids were received and were rejected by City Council. 1. Paul Gardner Corporation $ 70,977 2. Signal Maintenance, Inc. 78,411 On April 24, 1989, three bids were received: % Above Estimate 1. E & R Electrical Corporation $ 69,634 5% 2. Paul Gardner Corporation 69,981 5% 3. Signal Maintenance, Inc. 75,441 14% Engineer's Estimate: $ 66,410 The engineer's estimate reflects requirements by the State of California to replace the existing cabling with new cabling. All bids are available for review in the Office of the City Clerk. 2. Reason for Rejecting Bids Caltrans has scheduled a project to start in August, 1989, to synchronize traffic signals on Pacific Coast Highway. To prevent interference with the Caltrans project, staff recommends rejecting bids and re -advertising after Caltran's work is complete. Fiscal Impact: 1. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST Estimated Project Cost to Date Design $ 5,200 Construction -0- Ispection -0- TOTAL: $ 5,200 2. PROJECT FUNDING Funding Source - General Fund, designation for capital improvements. FY 88-89 Budgeted Amount Expenditure (6/30/89) Unexpended Funds * Estimated amount. $ 40,200 5,200 $ 35,000* Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Award a contract to the low bidder. 2. Drop the project. Respectfully submitted: Brian Gengle Assistant Engineer Concur: ty/actcp Concur: Anthony Antic Director of Pablic Works Attachment: Project Schedule cc: Steve Wisniewski, Public Safety Director Viki Copeland, Finance Administrator CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:. Planning Commission SUBJECT: Curb Side Recycling DATE: .June 19, 1989 The Planning Commission is requesting that the City Council • initiate a study which would thoroughly investigate recycling of all forms of refuse from residential, commercial and manufacturing uses. Staff Recommendation: Refer to Building Department, which is completing a survey on citizen interest in recycling. Also, the Building Department is coordinating the extension of the refuse contract with BFI which is also on the 6/27/89 Council agenda. Recycling pro- visions are included in this extension proposal. :evin B. Northc':ft City Manager June 20, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council June 27, 1989 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council receive and file this report. Background: Two sanitary sewer main lines collapsed within the last two weeks. The first was in Valley Park approximately sixteen feet below the surface. Because of the depth and nature of the repair work, special equipment and expertise was needed. A sewer contractor, Christeve Corporation, was hired on a time and material basis. The work has been completed and the City is awaiting final billing of almost $13,000. No additional appropriation is necessary. The second location was on Myrtle Avenue near 25th Street. Work on this repair is underway by City crews. The existing 8 inch non -reinforced concrete line collapsed approximately 45 feet south of 25th Street. The hydrogen sulfide gasses,that are released from wastewater, accelerated the deterioration of the pipe. Upon being notified of the collapse, staff from the City and the County Health Department visited the site. City staff followed the County's direction regarding disinfecting the area. Several repair alternatives were considered and evaluated. The least expensive and fastest alternative is to have the City crews perform the work. The Public Works Superintendent says all repair work should be completed by the Fourth of July holiday. No additional appropriation is necessary for this work. Alternative: An alternative available to City Council is: 1. Require more information. Res•ectfully submitted, Anthony Antich Director of Pu•lic Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Unavailable for Signature Viki Copeland Finance Administrator Concur: ern Highfie Public Works u erintendent Kevin B. Northcrt City Manager - 1 - (esr/pwadmin) 1 s June 22, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 27, 1989 RESPONSE TO HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT ON INTENT TO SELL SURPLUS PROPERTY Recommendation: That the City Council confirm its intent to acquire the surplus property offered for sale by the Hermosa Beach City School Dis- trict, known as .29 acres located off Prospect Avenue between Gentry and Hollowell, and 4.51 located at 425 Valley Drive, and authorize City staff and a Council representative to meet with the School District to finalize the transaction. Background: The City for some time has expressed an interest in preserving all available open space in the community by acquiring it. In this way, the open space can be preserved for public use for cur- rent and future generations. Adding to the City's open space is a City goal with the current Council, and acquisition and main- tenance of open space is the sole use of discretionary oil revenues as directed by a vote of the people. Analysis: The City Council, in closed session, has previously given au- thority to staff to indicate its intent to purchase these par- cels. This recommendation will ratify publicly that intent. Many arrangements need to be discussed and finalized before the transaction can take place. These include possible methods of financing, escrow company and instructions, title questions, restrictions on use of land, and purchase price. Accordingly, it is appropriate that discussions be arranged with the School Dis- trict representatives to work out these details. When the sale has been completed, a definite "win/win situation" will exist for both the City and the School District. The Dis- trict will have additional assets to provide for the educational needs of our students, and the City who will preserve in perpetu- ity our scarce public open space. The big winner on both sides of the transaction will be the citizens of Hermosa Beach. evin B. Northcr ft City Manager KBN/ld It June 19, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council June 27, 1989 EXTENSION OF AUDIT AGREEMENT 1988-89 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council extend the audit agreement with Grant Thornton for one year to provide the city-wide financial audit and Single Audit required for federal grants for 1988-89 at a cost of $21,900. Background The firm of Grant Thornton (Fox and Company, at that time) was selected as the City's auditor by the City Council via the RFP process for fiscal year 1981-82. The agreement has been extended by City Council each year through fiscal year 1987-88. Analysis Staff and the Treasurer recommend extension of the audit agreement for several reasons. A professional relationship has been established with the firm of Grant Thornton that has proved beneficial to the City. In addition to performing the audit, they are able to offer advice and expertise on financial matters throughout the year. There is also a cost benefit to the city in continuing with the same firm. The fee for the first year audit in 1981-82 was $19,200, not including extensive staff time. The auditors were in the City for several months as opposed to the few weeks they require to perform the audit currently. The proposed fee of $21,900 for 88-89 is compared below to prior year services. Proposed Prior Year $21,900 Regular audit including $17,210 Regular audit fixed assets and Single including fixed Audit Act assets (1987-88) 3,180 Single Audit Act (required in 1986- 87 only) $20,390 if Timing is also a consideration. The audit report was delayed because of the time spent by the auditors reviewing the certificates of participation relating to Hermosa Plaza. Staff and the Treasurer deferred extension of the contract until the report was finalized and submitted to the City Council on April 25, 1989. Preparation for the 1988-89 audit has already begun. In the interest of a timely audit and audit continuity, it is recommended that the agreement be extended for one year. Staff intends to prepare an RFP for the audit of fiscal year 1989-90 so that the audit can be competitively bid. Viki Copland Finance Administrator Concur: evin B. Nort ra t City Manager VC/kc Gary utsch City reasurer May. 31 , 19$9 Ms. Viki Copeland City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Ms. Copeland: Suite 1100 18300 Von Karman - P.O. Box 19585 Irvine, CA 92713-9585 714 553.1600 FAX 714 553.0168 GrantThornton T , Accountants and Management Consultants f. The U.S. Member Firm of Grant Thornton International Thank you for meeting and discussing with Lee Strom the change in circumstances relating to the City's accounting for its property and equipment, as well as reporting requirements under the Single Audit Act of 1984 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1989. As referred to in our letter of engagement dated May 8, 1986, any change in circumstances that arise and which require our services to be extended will be brought to your attention. Such change in circumstances will be subject to mutually agreeable arrangements made at the time and will be billed to you during the normal course of the engagement. In that regard, this letter will represent an addendum to the original letter of engagement referred to above and summarize in written form an update of the services requested and the revised fees associated with the request and change in circumstances. We will audit the general purpose financial statements (GPFS) of the City of Hermosa Beach (City) including those entities in which the City has oversight responsibility and/or direct legislative authority through the City Council (i.e., Vehicle Parking Authority, Crossing Guard District, Parking Authority and Street Lighting District). The GPFS consist of the combined balance sheet - all fund types and account groups at June 30, 1989, as well as the related combined statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balances - all governmental futd types, combined statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balances - budget and actual - all governmental fund types, statement of revenues, expenses and changes in retained earnings - all proprietary fund types and the statement of changes in financial position - all proprietary fund types for the year then ended. • Ms Viki Copeland • City of Hermosa Beach May 31, 1989 Page Two GrantThornton • Our 'audit will be a Single. Audit made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; the standards for financial and compliance audits contained in Standards for.•Audit of • Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities and Functions, issued by the U.S. General Accounting Office; the Singe Audit Act of 1984; and provisions of OMB Circular A-128, •Audits of State and Local Governments and 'will include our examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation and to report on the City's compliance with laws and rgulations and its internal accounting controls as required for a Single Audit. In addition, the supplemental information consisting of the combining financial statements by fund type and the schedule of Federal Financial Assistance Program Expenditures, presented for the purpose of additional analyses and not a required part of the basic financial statements, will be subjected to the procedures applied in the audit of the general purpose financial statements. We will not assist you in the preparation of the following information and such information will not be subject to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the general purpose financial statements referred to above: 1. All statistical data associated with the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). 2. Any other data, narratives, charts or tables. which may accompany the CAFR. The objective of our engagement is the completion- of the foregoing audit and, upon its completion and subject to its findings, the rendering of our reports. As you know, the financial statements are the responsibility of management and city council for the City who are primarily responsible for the data and information set forth therein, as well as for the maintenance of an appropriate internal control structure (which includes adequate accounting records and procedures to safeguard the City's assets). Accordingly, as required by generally accepted auditing standards, our procedures will include obtaining written confirmation from management concerning important representations which we will rely upon. • • GrantThornton r Ms. Viki Copeland ' City of Hermosa Reach May 31, 1989 .Page Three . As also required by generally accepted auditing stan•dard§., we will plan and perform our audit to obtain reasonable, but not absolute, assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Accordingly, any such audittis not a guarantee of the accuracy of the financial statements and is subject to the inherent risk that errors, irregularities (or illegal acts)., if they exist, might not be detected. As required by the Single Audit Act. of 1984, our.audit will include tests of transactions related to Federal assistance programs for compliance with applicable laws and regulations. However, because we will not perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is a risk that material errors, irregularities, or illegal acts, including fraud or defalcations, may exist and not be detected by us. We will advise you, however, of any matters of that nature that come to our attention, and will include such matters in the reports required for a Single Audit. This engagement will be undertaken based on hourly rates which have been substantially discounted for this type of work. The fee is based on your representations as to timely providing all requested audit schedules, supporting workpapers, documents, individual fund, trial balances, combining trial balances and similar items requested in connection with this engagement. A seperate letter detailing the aforementioned required items is provided under separate cover. It is our expectation that the discounted fee will be $21,900. Should the City not timely provide the required items, or wish to engage us to assist in the preparation of one or more of the items referred to above, such additional services will be at 70 percent of standard billing rates in effect at the time. Similarly, should the City or oversight agencies issue any bonds or other debt instruments which will require our involvement, such additional work and associated fee will be mutually agreed upon. Billings for the stipulated fee of $21,900 will be rendered as follows and are payable upon receipt: July 31, 1989 August 31, 1989 September 30, 1989 October 31, 1989 $ 3,000.00 4,000.00 13,000.00 1,900.00 $21,900.00 • GrantThornton Ms. Viki Copeland . City of Hermosa Peach May 31, 1989 .Page Four • Billings for any additional services will be billed to.you'on'a_ monthly basis as the work is performed. This engagement includes only .those. services specifically described in this letter and appearances before judicial proceedings, government organizations or other regulatory bodies,arising .our of this engagement will. be billed to you separately! We are enclosing an explanation of certain of our Firm's Client Service Concepts. We have found that such explanation.helps to avoid misunderstandings and enhances our ability to work more closely with our clients. We look forward to providing the services described in this letter, as well as other accounting services agreeable to us both. In the unlikely event that any differences concerning our services or fees should arise that are not resolved by mutual agreement, we both recognize that the matter will probably involve complex business or accounting issues that would be decided most equitably to both parties by a judge hearing the evidence without a jury. Accordingly, you and we agree to waive any right to .a trial by jury in any action, proceeding or counterclaim arising out of or relating to our services and fees. If you are in agreement with the terms of this letter, please sign one copy and return it for our files. We appreciate the opportunity to continue to work with you. Very truly yours, -"4RNITON EMSalkeld/LS mrc Enclosure rtner GrantThornton Ms. Viki Copeland •City of Hermosa Beach May• 31, 1989 Page Five The foregoing letter fulling describes our understanding and is accepted by us. Date CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Ms. Viki Copeland ti 0 Suite 1100 18300 Von Karman - P.O. Box 19585 Irvine, CA 92713.9585 714 553.1600 FAX 714 553.0168 GrantThomton GRANT THORNTON CLIENT SERV I CE CONCEPTS Accountants and • • Management Consultant's , The U.S. Member Firm of . . Grant Thornton International AN OPEN LETTER TO OUR CLIENTS: The following is a discussion of certain of our Firm's Client Service concepts. We have found that explanation of these concepts to our clients helps avoid misunderstandings and enhances our ability to work more closely with you. Moreover, although certain of these concepts may involve services you have not engaged us to perform, this discussion may help to clarify future engagements. Timeliness We not only aim to perform our work in keeping with the highest professional standards, but we also expect our work to be conducted efficiently and completed on time. We plan our engagements to make sure we do this. Nevertheless, because of circumstances beyond our control, and often beyond yours as well, this is not always possible. When circumstances arise where our plan cannot be carried out, we ask our people to inform you promptly of additional work we must do or of delays in completing our work. We believe you should be made aware of any matter that may impact our service or fees and to help resolve any problems which might arise. Accounting and Auditing Within the framework of our professional standards, we will use our skills as accountants and auditors on your behalf. However, as the management of the entity, you are necessarily more familiar with its day-to-day operations and with the reality underlying its books and records. Accordingly, your management (and board of directors) will remain primarily responsible for the data and information contained in the financial statements, as well as for the maintenance of adequate accounting records and internal controls for safeguarding the company's assets. As we near completion of our audit work, we will ask you to carefully review the financial statements and confirm to us in writing the important representations they contain which we will rely upon. Therefore, if there is anything in those statements that is not completely clear to you, please be sure to question us until you are satisfied. GrantThornton Issuance of Reports When we report upon your financial statements or other financial data, our exercise of professional ,due care• includes- impor't.ant processes wherein we review our own work. When our.work has been completed, our findings will be presented to you in' a formal report. Accordingly, although we may sometimes make a pencil 'or draft copy of our report available to you as a courtesy, those findings are not to be relied upon or disseminated until our completed formal report is issued. Other Information in Documents Containing Financial Statements The inclusion of our reports in documents containing information in. .addition to the financial statements and our reports thereon (e.g., annual reports to shareholders, regulatory filings, offering circulars, etc.) may require us to perform additional procedures to fulfill our professional 'or legal responsibilities. Accordingly, our reports should not be used for any such purposes without our consent. In addition, to avoid unnecessary delay or misunderstanding, it is important that you give us timely notice of your intention to issue any such document. Tax Services Our tax professionals will assist you in determining the lowest tax the law requires. And we urge you to engage us to help plan your affairs to take maximum advantage of those provisions of the tax code and regulations that might work to your benefit. However, as you know, we rely on your timely submission to us of the information we need to prepare proper returns for you. In turn, we will undertake to furnish you with tax filings sufficiently in advance of their due dates to give you time to review them. Your signature on a tax return evidences a serious responsibility and we want you to understand the document before you sign. We believe you are better served by an extension of the filing date, if necessary, than by an oversight caused by a hasty filing. In addition, we know you understand that not all provisions of the tax code are absolutely clear and that some tax positions we may discuss with you are not free from doubt or may be changed by subsequent interpretations. When there is doubt concerning the tax alternatives, we will discuss this with you so that you will be able to decide on the position you wish to take. -2- • GrantThornton Management Consulting Our management consultants are ready to help you deal with many of your business opportunities, problems and decisions.. Because of their great variety of skills and experience•, we hope you will soon get to know the consultants we have assigned to your service team. Any engagements they perform for you should always be subject to a'clear understanding as to the scope of•their work, the results to be achieved, the time the project will take, and the fees ',f.or our services. We will seek, whenever possible, to involve your people in the implementation of our suggestions, •as we are convinced that only then will you get -the maximum benefit from our work. Also, in our consulting, as in all our other services, we do not permit our personnel to make•manageme.nt decisions or otherwise to usurp management's functions. Instead, our efforts are directed to business and financial advice, the analysis of problems, the recommendation of solutions, and to monitoring the implementation of such solutions. Investment Advice As professional accountants, auditors and management consultants, we provide our clients with accounting, tax, financial and business services and advice -- not investment advice. We do not recommend the purchase or sale of stocks, bonds or any other investment(s). For example, when clients request that we "find" them a "tax shelter," our policy is to furnish them with the materials for several such investments which appear to meet their requirements, and advise them solely with respect to the tax aspects. We do not recommend, vouch for the bona fides of, or act as "offeree representative" with respect to these -- or any other investments. Services In Connection With Business Acquisitions Or Dispositions We would be pleased to provide you with accounting and tax advice or consulting assistance in connection with proposed business acquisitions or dispositions, including assistance with locating potential buyers or sellers. In any event, the accounting and tax ramifications are such that it is essential you notify us as soon as possible of your intention to enter into any such transaction -- and certainly in advance of entering into any contract which refers to us or to our report(s). -3- GrantThornton T In the accounting and auditing area, when you make an acquisition we find it is invariably to your• advantage to have the financial statements of the company to be acquired audited by the seller's accountants and for us to review their work. This is usually the most cost-effective means of proceeding and minimizes delay in the issuance of the seller's financial statements. Conversely,• if you are the seller,' we would' expect the purchaser's accountants to review our work prior to the issuance of.our final report. Among other matters, this protects you against the buyer later claiming misunderstanding (or djsogreement). with respect to your accov'ntiug policies and me.thods. . Independence One last point: ' To provide you with proper, unbiased and objective service, our• professionals should be independent of your organization.. This not •o•nly means that our people should not have any investment or other business dealings with your organization or personnel, but also, that they cannot accept gifts or other personal payments from you in appreciation for their services. Naturally, they are not to accept any commissions or other payments from any suppliers or other parties with whom you do business for having referred them to you. These rules are very important and we not only ask your cooperation in applying them, but request you to advise us if you observe anything that might indicate that these policies are not being followed. We intend the name "Grant Thornton" to stand for outstanding client service. We want you to be so pleased by our service that you will recommend us to your friends and business associates. If, however, any of our people do not adhere to the foregoing service concepts, or if our service does not please you for any other reason, please let us know. Feel free to call your account administrator, the managing partner of the office serving you, or any other partner. We would be pleased to answer any questions you might have about this discussion, or any other aspects of our client services. . Very truly yours, The Partners of GRANT THORNTON -4- • June 20, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 27, 1989 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY CENTER FIRE ALARM SYSTEM, CIP 89-615 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with Bell's Security Systems, Inc. at a cost not to exceed $34,645. 2. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary, within budget limitations. 3. Reappropriated unexpended amount ($11,775 thru 6-30-89) from the FY 88-89 budget to the FY 89-90 budget. 4. Appropriate for FY 89-90 an additional $26,789 from the General Fund Designation for Capital Improvements. Background: On February 14, 1989 City Council approved plans and specifications and authorized staff to advertise for bids for CIP 88-604, (the number for this project has been changed to CIP 89-615 for FY 89-90.) Only one bid was received and on March 14, 1989 City Council rejected the bid and authorized staff to readvertise. This project will provide a new heat detection fire alarm system throughout the Community Center buildings and will be directly connected to the Police Department dispatch room. Analysis: This analysis is divided into the following sections: 1. Why a Fire Alarm System is Needed 2. The Bids 3. Reference Check 4. The Lowest Cost & Most Responsible Bidder. lq 1. Why A Fire Alarm System Is Needed According to the Fire Department the present fire alarm detection system is inadequate and does not meet Uniform Fire Code (UFC) requirements. Refer to the attached memo. UFC (1985) Appendix III -C, 9(a) requires that Group A occupancies having an occupant load of more than 300 or more shall be provided with an approved fire alarm system which transmits a trouble signal. The Community Center is in the Group A occupancy category. Under HBCC Section 12-10, Fire Alarm Requirements and Installation Procedures, #6, the existing fire alarm system has exposed cables which must be enclosed in conduit. Under present code requirements, other public buildings in the City are not required to have fire alarm systems installed. The present system does not provede 100% coverage of the Community Center complex. The present system indicates when heat is detected within fire alarm protected areas, but does not locate which room the heat is in. Therefore, when the alarm is activated the Fire Department might not immediately know where to locate a potential fire. The new system will have heat detectors in all of the rooms, including the theatre, in the Community Center buildings. It will be connected to the Hermosa Beach Police Department dispatch room. It will enable the Fire Department to determine, in advance, which room heat is detected in, reduce the amount of time for the Fire Department to investigate the problem and prevent the spread of a fire. Finally, the City's Risk Manager says, a fully operational fire alarm system would reduce the insurance premium covering the Community Center against loss by fire. 2. The Bids On March 14, 1989 one bid was received from Fire Call for $42,381 and was rejected by Council. On the second bid date, April 6, 1989 four sealed bids were received by the City Clerk. The bids were publicly opened and read aloud. The bid results were as follows: 1. Bell's Security Systems, Inc $ 31,495 (26% above est.) 2. Fire Call, Inc $ 42,381 (70% above est.) 3. Masco Electric, Inc $ 46,150 (85% above est.) 4. Pyrocomm Systems Non Responsive Architect's Estimate $ 25,000 All bids are available for review in the Office of the City Clerk. 3. Reference Check Three references were questioned for each of the three responsive bidders. All three firm's have valid licenses with the State of California; no violations have been filed against the firms. 4. The Lowest Cost & Most Responsible Bidder Bell's Security System is the lowest cost bidder. The reference questionnaire indicates that Bell's Security Systems is the most qualified for doing this type of work, finishing on schedule, within budget, and producing quality work. Currently, Bell's Security System is under contract with the City on another project. Fiscal Impact: 1. THE CONTRACTOR'S COST Contractor Amount Not to Exceed: Contractor Bid 10% Contingency Not to Exceed Amount 2. It AND ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 31,495 3.150 $ 34,645 Estimated Project Cost Design Construction Inspection Subtotal Contingency Total ANTICIPATED EXPENDITURES FOR FY 89-90 is anticipated that $3,225 will be expended $ 3,225 31,495 3,270 $ 37,990 3,799 $ 41,789 by June 30, 1989. NOTE: No construction or inspection costs are anticipated in FY 89-90. 3. CIPs AWARDED AT END OF FY 88-89 Since this project began late in the fiscal year it is necessary to reappropriate the unexpended funds to the 89-90 budget. 4. PROJECT FUNDING FY 88-89 Budgeted Amount Expenditure (6-30-89) Unexpended Funds $ 15,000 3,225 $ 11,775 FY 89-90 Appropriation Re -appropriation Additional Funds Needed to Total Needed FY 89-90 Previous Expenditures Total Project Cost A City Council award of $26,789 for FY 89-90. Complete this project $ -0- 11,775 26,789 38,564 3.225 $ 41,789 will require an additional Alternatives: Other alternatives condidered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Reject the low bidder. 2. Re -bid the project. 3. Drop the project. Respectfully submitted: Brian Gengler Assistant Engineer Concur: Noted For Fiscal Impact: Unavailable for Signature Viki Copeland Finance Administrator Co r: An ony Antic Director of lic Works Steve Wisniewski Public Safety Director Bob Blackwood PersonnelJRiskManager Attachment: Project Schedule Memo Dated June 19, 1989 UFC, Appendix III -C, Page 359 HBCC, Page 152 4 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE PROJECT NAME : Community CenterFire Alarm System, CIP 138-bU4 ACCOUNT NUMBER : 001-401-8604-4201 TASKS I final design approval before advertising 11 or construction II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/1/1111 LEGEND TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : m, ACTUAL SCHEDULE : X : 100% COMPLETE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC I-----1 I 1 I Prepare advertisement & set bid opening date Advertising period (issue addendums as necessary) Accept sealed bids & public bid opening Review bids Award contract Sign contract (bonds,insurance & workers comp. cert.) Preconstruction meeting procedure Issue "Notice to Proceed" Construction Period Monitor progress & maintain records Progress payment and change order procedure Acceptance of work as complete Issusing and recording a "Notice of Completion" Retention Payment Project close out 1 ■ ■ 11,1 1 I I I • MIMI I I 111 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III 11111111 111111 111 11111111 11111111 /11111111 11111101 III 1111 1 1 1 1 1 1 • III 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 lessamossasillamosslosessitil June 19, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 27, 1989 REASONS FOR REPLACING THE CURRENT FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER 1. The sprinkler system in the auditorium is not supervised The only notification our dispatcher will receive at this time is by someone passing by. 2. Wiring is not protected The wiring is not being protected by conduit/raceways or concealed space. 3. Audible signal The entire complex does not have a audible signal for the evacuation of the occupants. Some of the rooms are being used as class rooms at this time. 4. The complex is not zoned The complex is too large and has too many rooms with locked doors for us to find a fire within a reasonable time. Respectfully Submitted: Brian Gengler / Steve Wisniewski Public Safety Director Assistant Engineer TAPE 2 610 -PIER 1985 EDITION APPENDIX III -C 8. ALARM SIGNAL SYSTEMS AND FUNCTIONS (a) When automatic alarm systems are not directly connected to the fire department or other approved agency, an approved external alarm device shall be provided when required by the chief. When external alarms are required. an approved sign which reads WHEN ALARM SOUNDS—CALL FIRE DEPART- MENT EPARTMENT shall be installed adjacent to the external alarm devices. (b) When alarm systems are not directly connected to the fire department or other approved agency. an approved permanent sign which reads LOCAL ALARM ONLY—CALL FIRE DEPARTMENT shall be installed by each man- ually operated actuating device. (c) When a fire alarm system is approved for use in combination with a public address or other means of communication, the fire alarm signal shall take precedence over such other communication system upon activation of the fire alarm system. 9. REQUIRED INSTALLATIONS (a) Group A Occupancies having an occupant load of 300 or more shall be provided with an approved manually operated Class IV, Type A fire alarm system. (b) Group E Occupancies having more than 50 occupants shall be provided with an approved manually operated Class I, Type A fire alarm system. (c) Group 1. Divisions 1 and 2 Occupancies and mental hospitals shall be provided with an approved automatic smoke detection and manually activated Class III alarm system of Type A, B, C or D. Group I, Division 3 Occupancies other than mental hospitals shall be provided with an approved smoke detection and manually activated Class IV alarm system of Type A, B. C or D. (d) Except for Group R. Division 1 Occupancies that comply with Section 1807 of the Building Code. fire alarms shall be provided in the following Group R, Division 1 Occupancies: 1. Apartment houses three or more stories in height or containing more than 15 apartments—Class II alarm systems of Type A, B, C or D. EXCEPTION: An alarm need not be installed in buildings not over two stories in height when all individual dwelling units are separated by at least one-hour fire - resistive occupancy separations, including attics and crawl spaces. and each individ- ual dwelling unit has direct exit to a yard or public way. 2. Hotels either three stories or more in height or containing 20 or more guest rooms—Class II alarm systems of Type A. B. C or D. The alarm system shall include provisions for smoke detection and manual operation in interior corridors and automatic detection in storage rooms. laundry rooms, furnace rooms and similar common areas. 10. SPECIAL PROVISIONS (a) The requirements for tire alarm systems under Section 9 may be waived in other than Group I and Group E Occupancies if the building is protected by an approved sprinkler system conforming to U. B.C. Standard No. 38-1 with shutoff 359 § 12-9 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE 12-10 § 12-10 Sec. 12-9. Establishment of limits in which bulk storage of Liquefied petroleum gases is to be prohibited. The limits referred to in section 82.105 of the Uniform Fire Code, in which bulk storage of Liquefied petroleum gas is re- stricted, are hereby established as follows: All property zoned for residential and commercial uses. (Ord. No. N.S. 440, § 1, 2-20-73; Ord. No. 82-698, § 1, 8-24-82) Sec. 12-10. Amendments made in the Uniform Fire Code. The Uniform Fire Code, 1982 Edition, is hereby amended and changed in the following respects: Section 10.307 of Article 10, Division III, of the Uniform Fire Code, entitled "Fire Alarm System," is hereby deleted and refer- ence should be made to the Hermosa Beach Fire Department Fire Alarm Regulations & Standard Installation Procedures and the Sprinkler System Procedures of which not less than three (3) copies are now filed in the office of the city Berk. Section 10.312(a), Article 10, Division III, of the Uniform Fire Code, 1982 Edition, is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 10.312 Wet standpipe, where required (a) Every Group A-1 through A-4 Occupancy of any height, and every Group I, H, B, C, and R Occupancy three (3) or more stories in height, and every Group H and B Occupancy twenty thousand (20,000) square feet in area shall be equipped with one or more interior wet standpipes extending from the cellar or basement into the topmost story, provided that Group A buildings having no stage and having a seating capacity of less than five hundred (500) need not be equipped with interior wet standpipes. Exceptions: (1) Wet standpipes are not required in buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic fire -extinguishing system. (2) Wet standpipes are not required in basements or cellars equipped with a complete automatic fire -extinguishing system. Supp. No. 8-82 152 (3) The reqs Article 1' protectic protectio to that p Section 10.3151 Fire Code, 1982 Section 10.315. (a) Approve( types shall be ventilating sr (1) An apps manna: (2) An apt - manna (3) An apt- ual an( (b) Regard provided for event of fire. Exception: (1) All co auton the cc need • (2) All a ing s. tion 1 from (e) Operz t an:. ed to, the vat- th other No. 8-82 June 15, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of June 27, 1989 APPROVAL OF INITIAL REPAIR WORK TO OLD PROSPECT SCHOOL RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission the City Council approve the replacement of the roof of the Old Prospect School and direct staff to proceed with a formal bid process for this project and appropriate $14,000 from the Parks and Recreation Facility Tax Fund into CIP #89-604. BACKGROUND At the January 10, 1989, Council meeting the City Council directed the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission to determine how to restore the old Prospect School utilizing volunteer services, establishing costs, determining scope of project and estimating time frames. A task force was formed at the Commission's February meeting. Since that time the task force has met twice. ANALYSIS The task force did make a recommendation to the Commission that included a much larger scope of work. Upon reviewing their recommendation the Commission decided it would be more prudent to limit the scope of work and delay the remainder until the Master Plan is completed. It is felt the Master Plan may be able to assist the City in determining what the building can be used for in the future thus determining the remainder of work that will need to be done. That is why the Commission is not recommending anymore work be done to the building until that report is completed. However it is being recommended that the Council approve the replacement of the existing roof now as it is in such a deteriorated condition that the remainder of the building will be destroyed by the elements if something is not done in the near future. As a City building, that piece of property has been neglected for years and the Commission would at least like to try to keep it from further deterioration. Staff did receive an estimate on the replacement of the roof and replacement of any dryrot that may be found. The roof replacement is estimated at $14,000 and the dryrot work was estimated at $45 per hour plus materials. The degree of dryrot cannot be determined until the roof is removed, therefore the hourly rate estimate is all that is available at this time. This project, should it be approved by the City Council, will be going out to formal bid. ir The remainder of work, the cleaning up of the inside and outside, and the removal of debris can be done in-house. Concur; Kevin B. 'Northcrgft City Manager G Ant'fiony Antich Public WorksZ rector Respectfully submitted Alana Mastrian-Handman Director Community Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal Impact Viki Co land Finance Administrator June 20, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 27, 1989 RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD BID FOR EXCESS WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE TO GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION Recommended Action: It is redommended that the City Council award the City's Excess Workers' Compensation insurance through the Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA) to General Reinsurance Corpora- tion (GRC) for a deposit premium not to exceed $22,400. Background: Excess Workers' Compensation insurance protects the City from losses resulting from a catastrophic injury to an employee or employees. The City selects the level at which it will retain the risk (or monetary exposure), this is called the Self Insured Retention (S.I.R.) Level. The minimum level that excess carriers are currently willing to write is $200,000. The City's current Excess Workers' Compensation policy expires July 1, 1989. The City's current coverage is with Employers Reinsurance Corporation (ERC) which was placed by Cal-Surance Associates as Broker for the City, and is a policy with a $200,000 S.I.R. Cal-Surance Assoc. did not submit a quotation this year for renewal coverage with Employers' Reinsurance Corporation. Several years ago this City joined with other municipalities to form the Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA). The ICRMA currently has twenty-eight (28) city members. The pur- pose of the ICRMA is to provide cities excess liability insurance through a pooled program and to place the cities other insurance needs at reduced group rates. This City is currently a member of the ICRMA Liability program and has accepted a quotation from the ICRMA broker for Excess Workers' Compensation Insurance. Analysis: The City's current excess insurance policy is for coverage with a $200,000 S.I.R. (self-insured retention) and a Statutory limit. The premium rate is $.4883/$100 of payroll. The deposit premium paid for FY 1988-89 coverage was $26,986. Current coverage: S.I.R. $200,000 Limit Rate Statutory .4883 Premium $26,986 Insurer Employers Re. The ICRMA broker, Frank B. Hall & Company, has submitted the at- tached quote for coverage. The recommended coverage is a policy with a $250,000 S.I.R. and a $10 million limit. The premium rate for this coverage is .4000/$100 of payroll. The deposit premium for coverage will be $22,100 plus 1% CIGA surcharge. Recommended Coverage: S.I.R. Limit Rate Premium Insurer $250,000 $10 Million .4000 $22,100 General Re. The recommended quotation reflects an 18% decrease in the rate from the previous year. This decrease is a result of two fac- tors, an increase of $50,000 in the City's S.I.R. (to $250,000) and the group purchase through the ICRMA. The City has not experienced a workers' compensation loss in ex- cess of $200,000. Alternative: Staff requested that the ICRMA broker submit a quotation reflect- ing the cost of maintaining the City's current policy limits ($200,000 S.I.R.: Statutory limit). The quotation received for this coverage, which could be considered by the Council, is for a rate of .5430/$100 of payroll which translates to a deposit pre- mium of $30,000. It should be noted that the $200,000 S.I.R. applies for Workers' Compensation (WC) injury only. The S.I.R. for Employers' Liability (EL) or a combination of EL and WC would be at the $250,000 level. Alternative Recommendation: S.I.R. $200,000/ $250,000 Note: Limit Rate Premium Insurer $10 Million .5430 $30,000 General Re. In addition to providing this quote, the ICRMA is continuing to develop a group purchase arrangement with General Reinsurance Corporation which would base participating city's premiums on a composite rate developed from the pooled loss experience of the individual cities. Attached is a letter from Mr. Rob Leong which describes the composite rating program. In order to participate in this program, the City must belong to the ICRMA Workers' Com- pensation committee. Membership to that committee is limited to those cities involved in the excess workers' compensation in- surance purchase. Ultimately, should the composite program be developed through the ICRMA, staff would recommend participation in the program with an S.I.R. of $300,000. Preliminary estimates indicate that the pre- mium rate will be approximately .1700/$100 of payroll, or $9,400. Staff will report to the Council regarding the development of this program. ICRMA Composite S.I.R. $300,000 Program: Limit Rate Premium Insurer $10 Million .1700 $9,400 General Re. Respectfully submitted, Robert A. Blackwood Risk Manager Concur: Kevin B. Nort craft City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator INDEPENDENT CITIES RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY QUOTATION FOR EXCESS WORKERS' COMPENSATION City: Hermosa Beach Policy Term: July 1, 1989-90 Workers Compensation Insurance: Limit(s) $ 10,000,000 Self Insured Retention $ 250,000 Insurer: General Reinsurance Corp. A.M. Best Rating: A+ XIV Employers Liability Insurance: Limit(s) $ 1,000,000 Self Insured Retention $ 250,000 WC and EL Combined Self Insured Retention Combined Estimated Total Annual Remuneration: $ 10,000,000 $ 250,000 Sell -Insured Retention Option(s): • • 1 • each accident/ each employee for disease each accident/ each employee for disease each accident/ each employee for disease each accident/ each employee for disease each accident/ each employee for disease each accident/ each employee for disease $5,525,702. Deposit Premium * $ 22,100. *Note: 1% CIGA Surcharge will be added to Deposit Premium. Policy Conditions: • Late claim reporting penalty endorsement will be added. • Any signiflclant change In payroll (+/-20%) should be reported. • • .4000 June 16, 1989 Mr. Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Administrator City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Boulevard Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ICRMA EXCESS WORKERS' COMPENSATION QUOTATIONS Dear Bob: Frank B. Hall & Co. of California Northern Division One Market Plaza Spear Street Tower, Suite 2100 San Francisco, California 94105-1189 We are pleased to present a quotation for Excess Workers' Compensation Insurance through ICRMA. General Reinsurance Corporation, an A+ carrier, is offering individual city quotations at discounted rates for the Group Purchase program. The quotation for your city is enclosed. Additionally, as mentioned at the June 14th ICRMA Governing Board meeting, we have negotiated a very attractive composite rating plan for all ICRMA cities. In the composite plan, the experience of all participating cities are blended together to develop a single rate with uniform coverage limits and self reten- tions. The combined experience of the group is highly favorable and results in savings for all cities. Gordon Davis will be coordinating a meeting of the Workers' Compensation Risk Management Committee in the next two weeks to explore this option further. As always, we are pleased to be of service to you and the city. Please feel free to phone me or Gordon Davis at ICRMA if you have any questions. Very truly your Robert Leong, ARM Vice President RL.T234I Enclosure cc: Gordon R. Davis General Manager, ICRMA Telephone (415) 543-9360 Telecopier (415) 543-5628 Telex: 4937656 (use prefix 71 with WU only) June 13, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 27, 1989 RESOLUTION FOR HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES IN THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution establishing the policy that fees charged for parking in City -owned parking lots shall be waived for handicapped parking spaces in these lots. Background: On May 31, 1989 the City received a request for handicapped on -street parking space(s) in the downtown area. The requestor realized that spaces are available in the lots, but believed he would be charged the normal fee. When Alright Parking was contacted, they stated that operating on their predecessor's policy, they generally charge for handicapped parking; however if they receive a protest, the fee is waived. Section 22511.7(b) and Section 22511.5 (b) of the California Vehicle Code clearly state that a disabled person shall be allowed to park in any metered or on -street space without paying any meter fee or incurring any fine for exceeding posted time limits. It does not address the question of fees for parking lots, either private or public. Analysis: A site investigation was done by staff and the following was determined: 1. Between 10th Street and 14th Street (Hermosa Avenue west to Beach Drive), there are no on -street handicapped parking spaces. 2. There are three (3) handicapped parking spaces in Lot C and two (2) in Lot A. To provide on -street handicapped parking spaces in addition to the five (5) parking lot spaces would require the removal of existing meter spaces. If handicpapped spaces, one each, were installed to abutt Lot C and Lot A, two meters would have to be removed. The meters recommended for removal are high yield meters, each generating approximately $600 per year. Alright Parking indicates that loss of revenue from the handicapped parking spaces would be small. Summary: Staff considers the existing five (5) handicapped parking spaces to be adequate. The requestor expressed dissatisfaction over paying a fee, not the number of spaces. Currently, there is a lack of policy regarding the issue of fees for these spaces. It is staff's opinion that waiving the fee for these spaces is a small price for the "goodwill" it will promote. Fiscal Impact: The foreseeable revenue for these spaces in the parking lot is minimal. Alternatives: Alternative available to City Council: 1. Determine spaces in parking lots insufficient for handicapped parking and consider on -street spaces. Res ectfully submitted, An ony Antich Director of P •lic Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Unavailable for Signature Viki Copeland Finance Administrator cc: Joan Noon Director of General Services Attachment: Resolution No. 89 - Concur: Kevin B. Nor •' craft City Manager City Manager Comment: The recommendation is consistent with the intent of State law and practice of at least some other publicly owned lots in the area. park/pwadmin 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A POLICY EXEMPTING HANDICAPPED SPACES FROM THE FEES CHARGED FOR PARKING IN CITY -OWNED PARKING LOTS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ESTABLISH THE FOLLOWING POLICY: SECTION 1. That handicapped parking spaces shall be exempt from the fees charged for parking spaces in City -owned parking lots. SECTION 2. That this Policy shall take effect immediately. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 27th day of June, 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: , CITY CLERK 13(1:44.1,62_ J-Vcr-jee , CITY ATTOERNEY June 21, 1989 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF JUNE 27, 1989 APPROVAL OF MODIFICATION TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY LIFEGUARD HEADQUARTERS BUILDING TO HOUSE EMERGENCY "911" EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the modification to the Los Angeles County Lifeguard Headquarters building subject to the addition receiving exterior finish treatment and painting consistent with the existing buildings. BACKGROUND: The lifeguard headquarters building are sited on city owned property and were permitted pursuant to a ground lease entered into on June 16, 1971. Article 10 of the ground lease requires written consent of the lessor (city) prior to making any additions or extensions to the building. ANALYSIS: Los Angeles County crews proceeded with construction of an addition on top of the lifeguard garage building without obtaining the requisite city approvals or obtaining a building permit. The addition of approximately 64 square feet will house emergency "911" telephone equipment. The location and design of the addition is not the most aesthetically pleasing; however, the visual impact can be minimized if the exterior treatment and colors are consistent with the existing buildings. A letter from the Department of Beaches explaining the need for this addition will be provided prior to the meeting. 1 r a ALTERNATIVES: Deny the approval of the building modification and request Los Angeles County to submit alternate proposals for siting an addition to house the "911" equipment Respectfully Submitted: __ZZ)/ff-- -t-et—t, William Grove Director of Building & Safety Concur: Kevin Northcraft City Manager 2 I .1 �TYPI CAL f�I �.R _SECTION L 9. to 3Z^• 1 ti9� (✓Y%ALV. jYAT r!7 PIf,E. ---114 1 } /3� 42.s.- 3 r 5 e! (..valI . . �/ 11`9 —+ '`� �_ `: �_ 1f.Z1 : r-1 ^�----- --- ►-s 171 1` oil l 1- 4 • t. V) N 1 . 1 1= 01 I 1 PI ER, >va 1 I w; ,.4 -•1 - -1 § 1 1�3`1'E�•�G% CG 1D�i`r,!.--.;.-:-:.,-1-?- . ��.I� 1 _I _ �!i_ 7 /•�. V. fit _O.. 1-1 sq -c- 11 _ les. -_. I _Thse. -...._.1"._8..-.-f_--_...g.=1..-. _- ). 4.1t • ;.-' yr :1 a O 3f F115-1-, v'tiC. 6t-Ic.• i= 1 >;;o I • • e1 -c r -1T� 0 4. 4I 4G:14.. 'r%f -CCJ • >l L w \C. • I in 1 • TOl.) ' Lo1�C. Ij LSt. ADD,r,oN 0/✓ .TQP Of GARA661Y v e Z 1• .cam =- ,c; U Gfo.' • i 1 L!_331 0 y4 ,TH 1-j.._ j___1__._-- •4 4 coNc. BLOCK. cq.6AIL/.6-E-. �T_xl�?. V' -t �lOj �.�Aov�» fox.G1?.lt�T�� Ar7Cox.1%i)1, of EXlv'T GVA9 s-rvcco ftN1sH Llwylv.rtj LOuvLttS G Wall. ti A`eVR.ox L.%u6 of fsKLGj. 612I.3.:Sc 50 U r H 1 -r- r N• i--1--r,f1111:1 - I/4 i • • N! O; • . 0, 5 C /4'' = 1 -0 Vint-RGcn4S (' MEM -RAO 1.1417f(— ColPc• R,t.ocl. +4. T co'. 0" (9_;) Top pe:4. kL.2c 6IAS?JEI D FRc Fact of 6e )C.ttY• n .rL_EL 12.0 STVCCO FI1,A151-� • • fort. LLrtr()_ LE. A? oX. tml. o*T Eyc\i* . G6'Ai'6 TED REED DIRECTOR COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS June 23, 1989 Honorable June Williams, Mayor and City Council of Hermosa Beach 1.315 Va ].1.ey Drive Hermosa Beach, CA. 90254 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CITY APPROVAL OF 911 EMERGENCY RELAY STATION ERIC BOURDON ASSISTANT DIRECTOR CHRIS KLINGER DEPUTY DIRECTOR STAN WISNIEWSKI DEPUTY DIRECTOR The County of Los Angeles Internal Services Department wishes to install a 911 emergency relay station atop the Hermosa Beach Lifeguard Headquarters' Emergency Vehicle Garage. This system will allow the citizens and visitors to Hermosa Beach to report emergency situations directly to the County Lifeguard Service, saving valuable time in what may be life-threatening situations. The County has determined that the relay station cannot be placed lower in the building because of the potential for flooding. Your kind and early consideration of this request will be appreciated by the Department of Beaches and Harbors. Very truly yours, TED REED, DIRECTOR Lawrence N. Charness Chief, Planning Division TR:LC:js cc: T. Reed, Director K. Johnson TELECOPIER (213) 821-6345 !2'3) 3059503 13837 FIJI V,;AY MARINA DEL REY CALIFORNIA 90292 140?"4. lw June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting June 27, 1989 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 89-991 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATED APRIL 18, 1989, PREPARED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 89-5241 AND APPROVED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION 89-5259 OF SAID COUNCIL, AND THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ESTIMATE, DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT CON- TAINED IN SAID REPORT; ORDERING CERTAIN CROSSING GUARD MAINTEN- ANCE SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED AND MAINTAINED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1989. Submitted for adoption above subject. At the meeting of June the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Concur: is Ordinance No. 89-991 relating to the 13, 1989, this ordinance was introduced by Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams None None None Respectfully submitted, • a, Linda" Riddle, Depu y City Clerk Kevin B. Northcr•. ft, City Manager a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .8 .9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 8 r -9q ( AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH„ . CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATED APRIL 18, 1989 PREPARED PURSUANT 110 RESOLUTION NO. 89-524.1. AND APPROVED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 89-5259 OF SAID CO,UNCIL.,' AND THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ESTIMATE, DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT CONTAINED IN SAID REPORT; ORDERING CERTAIN CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE SERVICES,T0 BE FURNISHED AND MAINTAINED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, . . HERMOSA BEACH CRSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1989-1990 , WHEREAS, the ity Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, did in Resolution No. 89-5241 of said Council, pursuant to the provisions of the "Crossing Guard Maintenance District Act of 1974" (Chapter 3.5, Article 2, 3 and 4, Sections 55530 through 55570, of the Government Code of the State of California), require the Director of Public Works of said City to make and file with the Clerk of the City Council a report in writing, presenting certain matters relating to the proposed Crossing Guard Maintenance District No. 1989-1990, as contemplated under the provisions of said Act; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works, pursuant to the requirements of said City Council as expressed in Resolution No. 89-5241 and did on the 18th day of April, 1989, file in the office of the City Clerk (who is ex -officio Clerk of the City Council) of said City, his report in writing responsive to the requirements of said Resolution No. 98-5241 and as contemplated under the provisions of said Act; and WHEREAS, the said City Council did in Resolution No. 89-5259 approve said report on the 25th day of April, 1989, in conformity with the provisions of said Act; and WHEREAS, said City Council did thereafter and on said' 25th 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .8 •9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 day of April, 1989, pass its Resolution of Intention No. 89-5260 declaring its intention to order certain Crossing Guard Maintenance Services for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989; and .WHEREAS, said City Council did on said 25th day of April, 1989in its Resolution,No. No. 98-5260 fix and designate' Tuesday,.the 13thday of June, 1989, at the hour of 8:00 p.m. of said day as - the time for hearing protests in reference to the•proposed maintenance and assessment, at the Council Chamber, in the City Hall, Civic Center, in the City of Hermosa Beach, California; an WHEREAS, at the time and place above stated for hearing protests in reference to the proposed maintenance and assessment certain written and oral protests and objections were filed and presented, which said protests and objections were fully and regularly heard and considered by said Council; and WHEREAS, said City Council being fully advised in the premises, does hereby proceed as follows: NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, FIND, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That said Council does hereby deny all protests and objections and does hereby approve, confirm and adopt the said report of said Director of Public Works dated the 18th day of April, 1989, and does hereby approve and confirm the assessment proposed for said proposed maintenance as set forth and referred to in said report, which said report is now on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City, open to inspection, hereby referred to and made a part thereof; and said City Counci 1 3 4 5 6 7 .8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 does hereby also confirm and adopt the respective instruments therein•contained and designated therein as SPECIFICATIONS, DIAGRAM AND PLAN NO. 1989-1990, Estimate of Costs.and Assessment,' all. of which, on file as aforesaid, are hereby incorporated •herein and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. Thattsaid Council does hereby order the said' contemplated maintenance to be made in accordance with the said. PLAN and SPECIFICATIONS therefor, so adopted and approved, and does hereby order and determine that the fiscal year referred to in said Resolution of Intention No. 89-5260 shall be and the same is hereby fixed and established as the period commencing on the 1st day of July, 1989, and ending on the 30th day of June, 1990, both dates inclusive, as therein set forth; and said Council does hereby levy the said proposed total assessment made to cover the costs and expenses of said improvement upon the respective several subdivisions of land in the assessment district described in said Resolution of Intention No. 89-5260 and as fixed and determined by said report, dated April 18, 1989, and the proposed assessment, filed therewith, as aforesaid, in the office of the City Clerk of said City, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989and ending June 30, 1990 both dates inclusive. SECTION 3. That the City Council hereby orders and directs the City Treasurer to establish a special fund entitled, "Hermosa Beach Crossing Guard Maintenance District No. 1989-1990 Fund"; and who shall place into said Fund all payments of assessments received from the County Tax Collector and payments shall be made out to said special Fund only for the purposes provided for in said Chapter 3.5, Article 2, 3 and 4, Sections 55530 through 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 55570, of the Government Code of the State of California. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk of said City is hereby ordered to transmit, or cause to be transmitted, to.the County Auditor of Los Angeles County, State of California, as contemplated under the provisions of the "Crossing Guard Maintenance District Acp of 1974", the Diagram and Assessment upon which such levy is based, and the County Tax Collector of - z said County (who is also the City Tax Collector for'said City) is ordered and directed to make collection of all assessments shown required by law of and to be performed by the officer, employee, or person so designated. SECTION 5. That prior to the expiration of fifteen days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the EASY READER, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 6. That this ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: „IV." City Attorney ty/cgord f. • • • ( . Mayor and Members of the City Council June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting June 27, 1989 ORDINANCE NO. 89-993 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 2-2.27 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE, "APPEAL FEES, CITY COUNCIL APPEAL OF COMMISSION DECISIONS NOT SUBJECT TO FEES", TO RELOCATE THE APPEAL FEE PROVISION FOR LAND USE MATTERS IN THE MUNICIPAL CODE, AND WAIVERING APPEAL FEES WHEN AT LEAST TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS SPONSOR RECONSIDERATION OF A COMMISSION DECISION. Submitted for adoption above subject. is Ordinance No. 89-993 relating to the At the meeting of June 13, 1989, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Creighton, None None None Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams Respectfully submitted, Lindge,,7;1411 Concur: Kevin B. Northc aft, City Manager Riddle, , Deputy City Clerk 2b 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 89-992 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 2-2.27 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE, "APPEAL FEES, CITY COUNCIL.' APPEAL OF COMMISSION DECISIONS NOT SUBJECT TO FEES," TO RELOCATE. THE APPEAL FEE' PROVISION FOR LAND USE MATTERS IN 'THE' UNICIPAL% CODE, AND WAIVING APPEAL FEES WHEN AT LEAST TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS SPONSQR RECONSIDERATION OF A COMMISSION DECISION... • WHEREAS, the City Council lipid a public hearing on: June 13, 1989 and' made the following Findings: A. Procedures for the appeal of Planning Commission decisions to' City Council are more appropriately located in Chapter 2;, Article 1 of the Municipal Code: "Administration, In General," than in Article 16, "Procedure, Hearing, Notices and Fees" of the Zoning Ordinance; B. It is.'appropriate for the City Council to have an option to bring up for reconsideration certain decisions made by the Planning Commission on land use matters, where the Code provides for an appeal, if at least two councilmembers sponsor such a reconsideration, without paying the fee required of other appellants; C. It is appropriate for the City Council to bring up for reconsideration any decisions rendered by any of the City's Commissions, where the Code provides for an appeal, if at least two councilmembers agree that the circumstances or conditions warrant such a reconsideration; D. Allowing the City Council to reconsider decisions of its various commissions is in the public interest; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain as follows: 3 00 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 1. That a Section 2-2.27 be added to read as follows: Sec:' 2-2.27 Appeal fees, .City Council appeals of Commissions decisions... not subject to fees. • Where the zoning ordinance. or municipal code allow; for ail•. appeal to be filed.with the City Council on matters regarding land use, a fee, established pursuant to Chapter 2, Article XIII' of the. Municipal Code shall accompany•such an appeal. In addition to such an appeal fee, the appellant shall be ",'responsible for providing any required public .noticing and shalt pay the direct cost of required newspaper ads. As used' in this section "land use matters" shallinclude zone. variances, condi%`ional use permits, tentative parcel and' tract maps, precise plans and any other discretionary process by which land use is regulated. In those instances where the City Council, or at least two members thereof, determines that it is in the public interest to reconsider a decision of any commission of the City, and.. only where the Municipal Code provides for an appeal, the City Council shall reconsider said decision and shall waive any fees normally required of the appellant. When the City Council, or at least two members thereof, sponsors bringing up such a reconsideration of a commission decision the City shall be responsible for providing any required public noticing and shall pay the direct cost of required newspaper ads. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 1609 of the Municipal Code is hereby repealed. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this• ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. 2 3 4 5 6 7 • 8 • 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ' PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1989. • • PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the . City .110r* Hermosa Beach, California. • ATTEST:. • . APPROVED AS TO F I lig!2.e. CITY ATTORNEY t/ccrsapp Crit CLERK • • • June 22, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 27, 1989 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 12 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLED "FIRE PREVENTION CODE", BY ADDING THERETO A PROVISION PROHIBITING THE USE OF FIREWORKS WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council introduce and adopt the attached ordinance. BACKGROUND: During some clean-up of the Hermosa Beach City Code, the provision which made it illegal to use fireworks in the city limits was inadvertently eliminated. ANALYSIS: Although state law prohibits possession or use of illegal fireworks, Police and Fire personnel would be unable to restrict the use of safe and sane fireworks within the city limits without a prohibitive ordinance. Passage of this ordinance will allow the continued enforcement and prohibition on the use of fireworks in the city. CONCUR: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager tfull Sl''itted, Steve S. Wisniewski Director of Public Safety C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 12 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLED "FIRE PREVENTION CODE", BY ADDING THERETO A PROVISION PROHIBITING THE USE OF FIREWORKS WITHIN CITY LIMITS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach is concerned with the public safety; and WHEREAS, each year fireworks are responsible for death, serious injury, and property loss; and WHEREAS, said City Council desires to reduce the risk of injury or property loss to the citizens of Hermosa Beach. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Chapter 12 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, titled "Fire Prevention Code", shall be amended by adding thereto a new subsection 12-17, titled "Fireworks Prohibited", to read as follows: "Sec. 12-17. Fireworks Prohibited. The possession, use, and discharge of fireworks, as defined in the Uniform Fire Code, is prohibited within the city limits." SECTION 2. That pursuant to Government Code Section 36937, this ordinance is designed for the immediate preservation of the public health and safety of the citizens of Hermosa Beach and the general public due to the threat of death, serious injury, and property loss that can be caused by fireworks, and shall become effective immediately upon adoption of a (4/5) vote of the City Council. /// /// /// 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY OF JUNE, 1989 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: C J. 141Le City Attorney S'1 C 1' 1 1\�l C Ll�'L May 18, 1989 Honorable Mayor June Williams and City Council Members 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 GC' C//; �S^0 ` ► RECEIVED MAY 2 21989 et RE: Skateboarding on privately owned commercial property. Dear Mayor and City Council Members: The Park Pacific Shopping Center (Alpha Beta), 1100 Pacific Coast Highway, Hermosa Beach California, 90254 has been experiencing a high volume of skateboarding people through- out said shopping center. This activity is very unsafe and could result in personal injuries or fatalities. The present Municipal Code of Hermosa Beach California, Section 19-26 does not cover said skateboarding activities on privately owned commercial property. Therefore, I am requesting a new law to prohibit skate- boarding and similar wheeled devices from entering on or through privately owned commercial property. I would also like to discuss the use of Fox 1 -Hr Photo flag logo on their property in Hermosa Beach, California. Please inform me by return mail of the date and time that I may appear at your council meeting. Thank You, con is Shopping Center • Alpha Beta • Security Pacific Bank • Far West Savings & Loan • Allstate 1100 Pacific Coast Highway • Hermosa Beach • California 90254 • (213) 374-8991 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 282 • Redondo Beach • California 90277 4a 7 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council June 27, 1989 June 19, 1989 SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT, EXTENSION AND AMENDMENT TO INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 88-949 • INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO RECONSIDER THE CURRENT MORATORIUM REGARDING HEIGHT IN THE R-2 ZONE WHERE SUCH ZONE ABUTS R-1 ZONES TO THE EAST, AND POSSIBLY AMEND SAID ORDINANCE TO INCLUDE THE R -2B ZONE AND ANY LOCATION WHERE R!-2 ZONING MAY CAUSE A VISUAL IMPACT TO.R-1. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the attached interim ordinance extending and amending ordinance No. 88-949. Background At the May 9, 1989 meeting the City Council directed staff to set the current interim ordinance for a public hearing to give it its last one year extension and also amend it to include the R -2B zone. Analysis At the time ordinance 88-949 was adopted, the R -2B zone was not included since it did not appear to be a problem. Now that there are several areas recently rezoned to R -2B, they should be included in the moratorium. Also, there are areas which are not specifically fronting on R-2 or R -2B, but are possibly impacted by the higher height allowed in the R-2 and R -2B zone because of their proximity. For example, the area between Barney Court and Meyer Court and 1st Street and the City limits was once zoned R-2 and is now R -2B. It was not originally included by staff because the R-1 lots to the east sided on the R-2 (now R -2B) lots instead of fronting on. However, these lots may have some view blockage, and should also be included in the amended ordinance. Maps have been attached with the proposed ordinance showing the recommended areas for inclusion. CONCUR: 'Kevin B. Northc'raft City Manager /I Michael" Sch1 . ac Planning Director 1 2 3 4 5 • 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 89 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO EXTEND ORDINANCE NO. 88-949 -ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES IN THE R-2 AND R -2B ZONES THAT EXCEED TWENTY-FIVE FEET IN HEIGHT AND ARE BORDERED GENERALLY ON THE EAST SIDE BY R-1 ZONES. WHEREAS, the height limits for R-2 and R -2B and R-1 zones are thirty,. thirty, and twenty-five feet, respectively; WHEREAS, the differences in• these height' limits can cause view blockages in R-1.zones that generally border on R-2 zones; WHEREAS, the view blockages caused by the close proximity between R-2 and R-1 zones can cause a loss of ocean views which thereby lowers the quality of life and prevents full enjoyment of coastal resources; WHEREAS, the City Council and Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach are currently studying the steps necessary to protect views while preserving quality of life for all persons; WHEREAS, allowing construction of residences in the R-2 and R -2B zones above the height limit for R-1 would defeat the purpose of the study in allowing view blockage to occur; WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 88-949 was adopted by the City Council of Hermosa Beach on July 26, 1988 whereupon it prohibited for a period of forty-five (45) days the issuance of Building Permits in the R-2 zone, including the locations described in Exhibit "A (1-4)" which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, that increased the height of a residence which exceeded the height allowed in R-1 (25 feet); WHEREAS, the City Council finds that other areas within the City exist that have differences in height limits between R-2, 1 4 2 3 4 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 R -2B, and R-1 and expressly make those areas part of this extension as shown in Exhibit "A (1-4)" which is attached hereto; WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858(a) provides for an urgency measure extension of (10) months, fifteen (15) days and a second extension of one year upon adoption by a four-fifths (4/5) vote following notice pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 mid a public hearing; WHEREAS, Government Code Section 36937 allows this extending; ordinance to take immediate effect for the preservation of public - peace, health and safety, and upon a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance No. 88-949 be extended and shall be amended to include all areas as shown in Exhibit A (1-4) an additional one year pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a). Section 2. The Planning Commission continue to study what steps are necessary to take to protect views while preserving quality of life for all persons. Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 36927, this ordinance is designed to protect the health and safety of the citizens of Hermosa Beach and becomes effective immediately upon adoption by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council. Section 4. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a completed building permit package on file with the City prior to August 23, 1988. Said package must include a completed building permit application form, completed conceptual plans (plot plan, floor plan, elevation plan and similar plans), 2 3 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and a lot survey. Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a diligent manner and must be issued a building permit within six months of the effective date of this ordinance. Section 5. That the City Clerk certify to the passage and adoption of the ordinance, enter the same in the book ofiorigina.l. ordinances of said city,' and make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City' Council at which the same is passed and adopted. Section 6. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, theCity Clerk shall cause the ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 27th day of June, 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: T/ordcc620 CITY CLERK j.Ple:r CITY ATTORNEY • EXHIBIT A-1 b TENTH — 4 FIFTEENTH 151_17 s • . t P0 URTEENTH PL. THIRTEENTH CO' (.0 • • • •. - • •1 • E'4 WLBIT A-2 • • THIRTIETH 1 r-). 0 1 FIRST ST. EXHIBIT A-3 6 EXHZBTT A-4 7 James K. Sullivan 1051 8th Street, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 372-1483 June 21, 1989 June Williams Mayor City of Hermosa Beach Dear Ms. Williams: I am writing in reference to Ordinances 88-949 and 88-956 which consider the effect of the R-2 height limits on the views of adjacent R-1 properties. This ordinance is specifically limited to a small area of North Hermosa Beach with views to the west. My request is that the ordinance be expanded to include the R-1 area on the north side of 8th Street between Prospect Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. I live in this area at 1051 8th Street. My wife and I enjoy wonderful views to the south and southwest which include the Palos Verdes Peniusula and on those special, clear days, Catalina Island. I enclose photographs which show the view and the effect on the view of new construction just down the street from our home. If the other R -2B lots across from us were permitted to build to the same heights, our view would be eliminated. We have a small home (less than 1,000 sq. ft.). The views give us tremendous enjoyment and a feeling of openness. We want to preserve them. Thank you for your attention. ( - • • _ _ • _ - ' "=.1' June 12, 1989 Honorable Mayor and City Council Meeting Members of the City Council June 27, 1989 HEARING TO' REVIEW DELINQUENT REFUSE CHARGES FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLACING SAID CHARGES ON, THE TAX ROLLS AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1) Receive testimony from affected property owners regarding '-- their delinquent refuse bills. 2) Adopt the attached resolution authorizing and directing the county assessor to include delinquent refuse charges, which remain ten days following this hearing, as a special assessment to be collected at the same time and in the same manner as county taxes. BACKGROUND This hearing is required pursuant to Section 27A-8 of the municipal code before delinquent refuse charges can be included as a special assessment with the tax bill. ANALYSIS The attached listing of properties constitutes those that Browning Ferris Industries reports were delinquent with refuse payments as of April 30, 1989. Notices were sent to affected property owners advising them of the opportunity to appear before the Administrative Appeals Board to dispute unpaid charges at a meeting held on June 7, 1989. The attached listing represents those properties with delinquent charges remaining following that meeting. The Administrative Appeals Board recommends that the properties remaining on the list have the delinquent charges added to the tax bill as a special assessment. Notices were sent to the property owners on the attached list advising them of the opportunity to appear before the City Council at this meeting to dispute the delinquent charges. The attached resolution directs the county assessor to place delinquent refuse charges on the tax bill as a special assessment. Exhibit "A" of the attached resolution will be modified by the Director of Building and Safety to delete any delinquent refuse.charges which are paid within ten days 1 following this hearing as provided for by Section 27A -8(a)(6) of the municipal code. Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 2 Respectfully submitted, William Grove Director, Building & Safety T 1 2 3. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY ASSESSOR TO INCLUDE DELINQUENT REFUSE BILLS AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO BE .COLLECTED AT THE SAME TIME AND IN THE SAME MANNER AS COUNTY TAXES. WHEREAS, Section 38790.1 of the.California Government Code authorizes cities to collect delinquent refuse bills via a. special assessment to be collected with county taxes; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 86-840 which provides for collection of delinquent refuse bills in accordance with California Government Code Section 38790.1; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Ordinance No. 86-840, property owners have ten days from the date of the hearing to pay the delinquent refuse bill to avoid the special assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Each delinquent refuse bill shall be increased by ten dollars ($10.00) to compensate for the administrative costs incurred by collecting delinquent refuse bills via a special assessment. Section 2. The list of properties and the amount to be collected, attached as Exhibit "A", shall be forwarded to the county assessor for posting on the tax bill as a special assessment. Exhibit "A" may be modified by the Director of Building and Safety to delete those parcels where delinquent • 1 2 3 4 5 6 .7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 refuse charges are paid within ten days following the, City Council hearing. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th DAY OF JUNE, 1989. . - 0 President of .the City Council and Mayor of the City of' Hermosa.Beach, California ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney rt EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL # AMOUNT 4188 009.015 4183 013 036 .4183 013 032 4185 014 039 4187 019 028 4185 020 007 4185 023 008 4182 011 003 4184 009 035 4184 014 018 4181 011 022 4187 022 032 4183 015 002 4182 008 005 4188 010 029 4187 025 041 4187 022 009 4183 013 035 4183 013 030 4183 015 016 4186 017 006 4160 026 009 4186 015 018 4184 024 006 4188 006 005 $180.14 145.89 145.89 53.38 145.89 155.89 70.00 109.77 119.99 115.07 31.69 63.38 145.89 231.78 317.67 231.78 53.38 145.89 145.89 145.89 31.69 145.89 229.47 156.71 317.67 4183 022 010 4183 022 007 4188 029 044 4188 029 045 4188 029 048 4188 029 040 4188 029 '039 4187 033 014 4187 022 016 4187 008 021 4186 009 012 4161 029 008 4161 029 026 4187 019 017 4185 006 018 4185 007 025 4185 023 049 4184 012 001 4182 006 007 4183 024 010 4184 014 030 4182 015 001 4181 023 008 4181 019 024 4181 016 016 4185 008 031 180.14 135.89 221.78 63.38 41.69 231.78 107.36 145.89 145.89 145.89 53.30 51.98 145.89 231.78 145.89 231.78 38.92 145.89 53.38 145.89 115.07 221.78 145.89 63.38 63.38 492.92 TOTAL: 7,403.39 •CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LEIN ACCOUNTS .JUNE 7, 1989 RESIDENTIAL ACCOUNT* $AMOUNT PARCEL 8 SERVICE ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS RECEIVED JUN 2 0 1999 PRIOR LEINS 8825606 $170.14 .4188-009-015 230 BAYVIEW ' 65540 8135.89. 4183-013-036 1460 BAYVIEW 42127 $135.89 4183-013-032 1512 BAYVIEW 8808339 $43.38 4185-014-039 1257 BONNIE BRAE 8841330 $135.89 4187-019-028 1207 CYPRESS 8848483 $145.89 4185-020-007 1534 GOLDEN 11577 $60.00 4185-023-008 1725 GOLDEN 74278 $.¢1.77 4182-011-003 2416 HERMOSA AVE 73023 $109.99 4184-009-035 2034 HILLCREST 8881492 $105.07 4184-014-018 2204 HILLCREST 8906018 $21.69 4181-011-022 451 LONGFELLOW 2650232 $53.38 4187-022-032 620 MANHATTAN AVE 65664 $135.8? 4183-015-002 1730 MANHATTAN AVE 38216 $221.78 4182-008-005 1951 MANHATTAN AVE 65748 $307.67 4188-010-029 527 MONTEREY BLVD 65755 8221.78 4187-025-041 706 MONTEREY BLVD 65763 $43.38 4187-022-009 713 MONTEREY BLVD 51979 $135.89 4183-013-035 1509 MONTEREY BLVD 51961 $135.89 4183-013-030 1515 MONTEREY BLVD 10181 $135.89 4183-015-016 1819 MONTEREY BLVD 8980047 $21.69 4186-017-006 429 OCEAN VIEW 60723 $135.89 4160-026-009 438 PROSPECT AVE 78360 $219.47 4186-015-018 583 PROSPECT AVE 67496 8135.0? 4105 018 424 igi4 PROSPECT AVE 75663 $146.71 4184-024-006 2016 SPRINGFIELD 9033069 8307.67 4188-006-005 336 THE STRAND 9061664 $170.14 4183-022-010 1793 VALLEY PARK 9058991 $125.89 4183-022-007 1835 VALLEY PARK 46714 $211.78 4188-029-044 603 3 ST 8558520 $53.38 4188-029-045 615 3 ST 46516 $31.69 4188-029-048 633 3 ST 58057 $221.78 4188-029-040 636 4 ST 8739252 $97.36 4188-029-039 650 4 ST 8583056 $135.89 4187-033-014 611 6 ST 8612863 $135.89 4187-022-016 208 8 ST 8612970 $135.89 4187-008-021 221 8 ST 62588 $43.30 4186-009-012 835 8 ST 93708 $41.98 4161-029-008 1121 9 ST PYLE, THOMAS S. CURRIE III, ROBERT F. TROTTER, OSCAR F. LITZINGER, NORBERT C. CHRISTENSON, JOHN A. 6ARDINA, ROBERT M. KINEL, BRIAN E. JUDO, ROY A. ROBB, KEVIN W. LANDAU, MIRIAM MYERS, GRACE P. FRASER, WOODY/FORREST ESCALANTE, MICHAEL F. KELLEY, KAROLYN K. HUGHES, KENNETH S. BRIGGS, KATHLEEN G. NE6LIA, ROSS A. CURRIE III, ROBERT F. CURRIE III, ROBERT F. TROTTER, OSCAR F. HB/AB ROBBINS, SYLVIA SAFFERY, BRUCE K. StH`TW NARIFFN N. BALLEJOS, ANTHONY S. PETTYJOHN, CAROL L. AKERLUND, FREDERICK E. GARCIA, VICKI S. INSCHO, JEANNE BERRIDGE, ROBERT A. BERRIDGE, ROBERT A. BERRIDGE, ROBERT A. BERRIDGE, ROBERT A. NALLERY, CLARKE E. CURRIE III, ROBERT F. CURRIE III, ROBERT F. RADIS, BRIAN K. SHIROTANI, NOBUYASU P.O.BOX*1926,REDONDO BEACH 90277 P.D.BOX*51,HERMOSA BEACH 90254 YES 1819 MONTEREY,HERMOSA BEACH 90254 YES 1259 BONNIE BRAE,HERMOSA BCH 90254 SAME SAME SAME SAME SAME 2212 VIA CERRITOS,PALOS VERDES 90274 SAME SAME SAME YES SAME YES 525 MONTEREY BLVD,HERMOSA 90254 YES P.O.BOX*91,HERMOSA BEACH 90254 YES SAME P.O.BOX*51,HERMOSA BEACH 90254 P.O.BOX*51,HERMOSA BEACH 90254 SAME P.O.BOX*2435,REDONDO BEACH 90278 2836 MAY AVE REDONDO BEACH 90278 .",AMCC D 16 511 GARNET ST,REDONDO BEACH 90277 12416 N.28 DR *18-193,PHEONIX AZ SAME SAME 3207 MANHATTAN AVE,HERMOSA BCH 90254 342 ARDMORE,HERMOSA BEACH 90254 342 ARDMORE,HERMOSA BEACH 90254 342 ARDMORE,HERMOSA BEACH 90254 342 ARDMORE,HERMOSA BEACH 90254 SAME P.O.BOX*51,HERMOSA BEACH 90254 P.O.BOX*51,HERMOSA BEACH 90254 SAME SAME YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 39479 $135.89 4161-029-026 1140 10 ST 62612 $221.78 4187-019-017 403 11 ST 17046 $135.89 4185-006-018 825 15 ST ;8680076 $221.78 4185-007-025 953 15 ST 98525 $28.92 4185-023-049 1252 17 ST 8700866 $135.89 4184-012-001 848. 19 ST TOWER, BARBARA BRIGGS, KATHLEEN G. BIJAKIIAN, KRIKOR DURAN, RICHARD F. ALLEN-BLAINE, ROBERT HENDERSON, PAMELA N. SAME P.O.BOX*91,HERNOSA BEACH 90254 1420 PACIFIC CST HWY,HERMOSA 90254 SAME SAME SAME YES YES YES YES 100834 $43.38 4182-006-007 18 20 ST 71126 $135.89 4183-024-010 585 20 ST 47704 $105,07 4184-014-030 928 24 ST 54726 $211.78 4182-015-001 428 25 ST 8754210 $135.89 4181-023-008 229 27 ST 8786220 $53.38 4181-019-024 311 31 8795791 $53.38 4181-016-016 245 33 ST TOTAL $ (AZ110. • COMMERCIAL ROBBINS, SYLVIA P.O.BOX#2435,REDONDO BEACH 90278 MISCIONE, MARK A. SAME YES LANDAU, BENJAMIN 2212 VIA CERRITOS,PALOS VERDES 90274° ENDLER, JUDITH SAME WOOD, LARRY E. SAME YES JACKSON. STEVEN D. SAME SADLER, TOM SAME 3619624 $482.92 4185-008-031 1416 PACIFIC.CST HWY BIJAKIIAN, KRIKOR 1420 PACIFIC CST HWY,HERMOSA 90254 TOTAL $482.92 BRAND TOTAL 4.$9 3.3/ 0' June 22, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council June 27, 1989 SUBJECT: RECONSIDERATION OF BILTMORE SITE RECOMMENDATION LOCATION: BILTMORE SITE PUBLICLY OWNED PORTION AND 15TH STREET ABUTTING THE STRAND INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL TASK FORCE BETWEEN 14TH PURPOSE: PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS OF TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommendation Staff's recommendation remains the same as noted in the attached Planning Commission report dated June 6, 1989. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission essentially recommended to place the Task Force Recommendation on the ballot and to also include another ballot measure for single family, R-1 zoned, development of the entire subject property. Analysis In summary, the Planning Commission determined that monetarily the highest, and best use of the subject property would be single family dwellings, and that the Task Force recommendation would only marginally generate any income for the City, or none at all. The minutes of the June 20th public hearing will be provided on Monday, June 26 for review. Refer to the attached staff reports for staff recommendation and analysis. Attachments 1. Staff reports dated June 6th and 20th, 1989. 2. Planning Commission minutes of June 6th, 1989. s ect4ful ly .m ted 1 is ael Schubach CONCUR2c.�„,_ /) Planning Director 2:2t 61-t Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager T/CCSR622 1 CITY MANAGER COMMENT: I concur with the June 6, 1989 staff recommendations, noting that any new parking provided on Lot C for commercial businesses should be via the Vehicle Parking District and require payment of appropriate fees. The Planning Commission recommendation is unworkable; since an issue needs 50% plus one and voters will tend to vote yes on only one most desirable option, three issues are a waste of time and government election costs. This is especially true when two of the three are related open space issues, which would cause a split of voters favoring open space. Residential was rejected by the voters within the last year and received less total votes than the two commercial options on the same ballot. The criteria given the task force of a consensus -building final resolution option resulted in their recommendation, offered by more than 2/3 of their diverse membership. The time constraint required of the Planning Commission resulted in a much quicker review, and a much less consensus building, "3-2" recommendation. even B. Nort City Manager June 14, 1989 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beacb Planning Commission June 20, 1989 (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 6, 1989 MEETING) SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-6 AND ZONE CHANGE 89-3 LOCATION: BILTMORE SITE, PUBLICLY OWNED PORTION BETWEEN 14TH AND 15TH STREET ABUTTING THE STRAND (REFER TO ATTACHED) INITIATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS OF TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Recommendation Staff's recommendation remains the same as noted in the attached staff report dated June 6, 1989. Background At the June 6, 1989 meeting; the Planning Commission requested additional data on the following: 1. Cost of underground parking. 2. Traffic impact of commercial uses. 3. Reorientation of proposed uses so that the Open Space is on the north and commercial is on south. 4. Contingency plan, if bidder fails half way through project. 5. On-site parking rather than remote. 6. Cost of police patrol for park. Analysis Cost of Underground Parking The cost of two levels of underground parking is approximately $34 to $40 per square foot. Beyond two levels, the cost will increase considerably. Based on the square foot cost of $40.00 per square foot, the price per space including turning area would be $13,600. Therefore, the cost for underground parking for a 7,000 square foot family chain restaurant would be $952,000. Note that this estimate is based on the highest cost for underground parking, and the minimum size restaurant; the cost could be less if for instance, only one level of parking was underground, and one level was at grade, and the restaurant was on the second level. Traffic Impact for Commercial Uses To determine what the impact would be for all the potential commercial uses is not possible at this time. However, since a restaurant is a possible use, and is one of the higher traffic generators, staff has computed the traffic impact based on a 7,000 square foot restaurant. The average daily trip generation would be 6,692 trips per day. This figure should be tempered with the consideration of beach -goers, bicycle, and foot traffic which a restaurant in the subject location would attract. A conservative rule of thumb estimate would be about 25% of the clientele will be either foot/bike traffic, and/or beach -goers. Reorientation of Proposed Uses By reorienting the proposed uses in a north/south rather than an east/west relationship there are some benefits and some negatives. The openness and view of the urban plaza from the Strand is lost; the plaza becomes long and narrow. The commercial area would have the utilities, under Beach Drive, running approximately through the middle of it. A most recent estimate of relocating the utilities was $2,000.000. The benefit of such a reorientation would be to limit the impact to the residential views along 15th Street and the possible traffic impact of commercial development. The plaza would act as a buffer to the residential along 15th Street interfacing with commercial. The view from the commercial area may be enhanced in some respect since development could abut the Strand rather than be setback 100 feet. Windows on three sides, a broader visual angle of the beach, and a closer view of the pedestrians along the Strand would result. Contingency Plan There is no absolute way to guarantee a developer will not go "belly up". However, contractual agreements developed by the City Manager and City Attorney can certainly provide some guarantee that the City will not be left "holding the bag". What the guarantees will be, cannot be determined at this time, but since the City owns the property it has a great deal of control and option in negotiating a sale, or lease. On -Site Parking The commercial area is approximately 16,000 square feet. Approximately 23,800 square feet would be needed to provide 70 parking spaces for a 7,000 square foot restaurant. Sixteen thousand square feet is adequate for two levels of parking totaling 23,800 square feet. A combination of at -grade, above -grade, and/or below -grade could be utilized. Note that two levels above -grade cost slightly less than below -grade, $30 to $34 per square foot, or approximately $809,200 for 70 spaces. Police Patrol Depending on the situation the cost of police patrol could be zero to $300,000. If the urban plaza does not become an attraction to the homeless, drug peddlers, and panhandlers then the cost would be absorbed; it would just become a part of the current police patrol. However, if it does become an attraction, then the current district would be split, a patrol service would result, and the cost (1 man, 24 hour service) could be $300,000. T/pcsrspa 3 Michael Schubac Planning Director RECONSIDERATION OF BILTMORE SITE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION CHANGING THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE ZONING OF THE PUBLICLY -OWNED PORTION OF THE BILTMORE SITE FROM SPECIFIC PLAN AREA TO OPEN SPACE FOR THAT PORTION WEST OF BEACH DRIVE AND TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND C-2 FOR THAT PORTION EAST OF BEACH DRIVE BETWEEN 14TH STREET AND 15TH STREET Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated June 1, 1989. At the March 20, 1989, the Task Force adopted a recommendation; at the meeting of March 27, 1989, the language of the recommendation was approved. P.C. Minutes 6/6/89 The Planning Commission, at their meeting of April 18, 1989, recommended adoption of. the Task ' Force recommendation and further recommended implementing said recommendation with a specific plan area with the added provision that any commercial uses must be reviewed by the Planning Commission to ensure . compatibility. with surrounding. uses. At the May 23, 1989, City Council meeting, the City Council referred this matter back to the Planning Commission to consider several issues of concern related to the Task Force recommendation. The issues are:• . • 1. Existing public parking on lots facing 15th Street. 2. Economic viability of the proposed commercial lots. • 3. Potential of a restaurant on part, or all, of the proposed commercial portion. 4. High density, R-3, residential development along 15th Street in relation to the proposed commercial zoning for the two lots. 5. How the initiative process will impact commercial options. 6. What the impacts would be of (a) a 30 -foot height limit; (b) maintaining 15th Court as publicly owned. 7. Use of public parking, Lot C, and/or parking structures to provide parking for commercial development. 8. What type of restaurant could possibly be constructed under the constraints of the Task Force recommendation. Existing Public Parking The loss of twenty public parking spaces could become an issue before the Coastal Commission. Even if the Herriott initiative passes, the issue of the public parking could be raised at the Coastal Commission public hearing to amend the Certified Land Use Element. The possibility of providing additional parking at another location, such as a parking structure on Lot C, or parking under the open space, urban plaza, should be considered. If the property is sold, some of the funds could be set aside for providing additional parking. If the property is held in public ownership and leased, then some of the rent and sales tax received over time .should be set aside to ultimately develop a parking structure. Lot Facing 15th Street Two of the subject lots which face 15th Street abut residential development and also face residential development on the north side of 15th Street. If these lots were to be developed separately from the other subject lots, access would be from 15th Street. The traffic impact to this generally residential street could be significant. Also, the orientation of the commercial development would be interfacing with residential development. Therefore, it would be more desirable to have these lots developed in conjunction with the three subject lots facing 14th Street and requiring ingress and egress and orientation toward 14th Street. P.C. Minutes 6/6/89 An alternative would be to rezone the subject lots on 15th Street to R-3, allowing - residential rather' than commercial development. Commercial Development and/or Restaurant Development • The proposed commercial lots could be developed separately; however, the potential of development of the value of the lots is directly related to the size of the lots. Small lots have much less potential for commercial development and consequently less value. • Staff .has conducted some research into developing a family-oriented major chain restaurant on the subject property; e.g., Charlie Brown's, Rueben's, Red Onion. These types of restaurants generally want to be "over parked," that is, more than the City's zoning requirements. The floor area generally ranges from 7,000.to 10,000 square feet, and the total land area needed ranges from 40,000 to 70,000 square feet. Further, parking structures are generally not desirable because most business is conducted at night and Structures have related night-time crime problems. Also, the profit margin does not warrant a parking structure. However, a variety of other factors are taken into consideration such as location and adjacent uses. These factors can overcome the. general requirements as noted. In relation to the subject site, the potential of a hotel adjacent on the south, the open space urban plaza, the unique beach, The Strand, ocean view, the high density of population within walking distance, and the annual summer tourists, could all be priority factors which can overcome some of the general "rule of thumb" requirements for a major restaurant to locate on the commercial portion. Staff would believe, if the City desires to attract a major chain restaurant, the total area proposed for commercial zoning should be made available. Therefore, the small vacated portion of 15th Court which was recommended to remain publicly owned should be made available for purchase and utilization in conjunction with the proposed commercial lots. The total area would then equal 15,789 square feet. Based on the general need of 40,000 to 70,000 square feet of land area, some type of parking arrangement would be necessary. As noted, funds either through taxes and lease of the property or sale, could be set aside for some form of parking structure under the urban plaza or on Lot C, and in addition to replacing the public parking, additional spaces could be provided for the restaurant. A market study would be useful to determine how much walk-in and bicycle traffic could be expected and would thereby determine how much parking would be necessary. It would appear that a long-term lease of the property would also be more viable than selling, since the City could control the up -front cost, making it more desirable. For example, the City could request a certain amount needed for the parking structure and make an adjustment on the monthly rent. It should be noted that the property is not in the Vehicle Parking District; however, a property owner may request to belong, and district boundaries could be widened to include the property. If the property were to be used by itself, staff estimates that approximately 4300 square feet of floor area could be developed with 43 on-site parking spaces on the entire portion proposed for commercial use. If only the portion between 14th Street and 15th Court were used., a maximum of 2200 square feet with 22 parking spaces could be developed. • P.C. Minutes 6/6/89 Ballot Initiative If this matter were to be placed on the ballot and voted upon, the only recouFse the City. would have if, for instance, the commercially -zoned portion of the 'site were .to be determinednot viable for commercial use, would be to place the matter back on the ballot at a later date with an alternative proposal; or it may be possible to place an alternative on the ballot, such as maintaining the property as public parking, if determined to be economically unfeasible as commercial. 30 -Foot Height Limitation The height limitation should not pose a serious impact to development of the subject property. since three stories could be built within that height even though it •is five feet less than the maximum permitted within the downtown, C-2 zoned, ai-ea. Recommendations Staff recommended the following items: 1. The proposed commercial portion of the subject property should be allowed to develop as one development. 2. The vacated portion of 15th Court should be included with the proposed commercial portion. 3. A parking structure on Lot C or underground parking should be provided for replacement of the existing public parking on the subject property and to supplement parking on the proposed commercial lots. 4. Money from the sale of the commercial portion or from a lease arrangement should be set aside for the parking structure. 5. Commercial development should be oriented away from 15th Street, and all ingress and egress to the commercial lots should be from 14th Street. 6. A major restaurant should be the priority use of the commercial lots, and the City should do whatever possible to attract such a use. 7. A market study should be made to determine parking needs, as well as other market factors. Comm. Ingell noted that square footages for each parcel are not given in the staff report, nor are there any square footages given for the urban plaza. He noted that the Commission is to address this from a planning standpoint. Mr. Schubach discussed the various square footages of lots. He stated thatthe total of the five lots is approximately 16,000 square feet. He noted that there was a difference of approximately 1,000 between the staff's calculation and that prepared by GWC design; however, for this purpose staff did not feel it necessary to recalculate at this time. He noted that there is an irregularly-shaped lot included. Mr. Schubach continued by discussing the sizes of the various lots and the alley, which is 20 by 210 feet. He stated that each of the lots is 30 feet by 80 feet, for a seven -lot total of 16,800 square feet. P.C. Minutes 6/6/89 Comm. Ingell questioned how much the City feels it can generate by the sale or lease of Parcels 2 and 3 combined. Mr. Schubach stated that appraisals were made; however, the City Manager did not feel any definite answer could be given at this time. Comm: Ingell asked the approximate cost of constructing a park, excluding maintenance fees. Mr. Schubach stated that the cost of park construction has not been considered. Comm.' Ingell asked the cost of a subterranean parking structure. Mr. Schubach explained that a parking structure above grade would cost approximately $13,000 per parking space. A subterranean parking structure is approximately $20,000 per parking space because water is pumped and shoring would be necessary. .He said that underground parking would not be impossible, however. Comm. Ingell asked what restaurants are currently paying per square foot. Mr. Schubach stated that that cost was not addressed. He stated that questions such as this have variable answers, based on location and other issues. Comm. Ingell felt that additional information is necessary before this matter can go forward. Comm. Inge!! felt that parking for restaurants is vital, and lack of parking could be quite a negative. Comm. Peirce felt that definite numbers at this point would obscure the issue. He felt that the issue is to hear testimony and base the discussion on what percentage should be used for a restaurant, how much parking is necessary, height, et cetera. He did not think the Planning Commission has the expertise to discuss the in depth numbers. Chmn. Rue stated that consideration must be given as to whether or not a restaurant is actually desirable or viable at that location. Comm. Peirce did not feel that staff or the Commission could determine whether a restaurant would be economically viable. Hearing opened at 10:03 P.M. by Chmn. Rue. Ann Gubser, 34 17th Street, Hermosa Beach, task force member, addressed the Commission. She felt that the staff recommendations were reasonable. She stated that an advantage of this proposal versus the open space proposal is that this proposal would provide funds to finish the improvement of the urban plaza; however, this was not mentioned in the staff report. She felt that Item 4 of the recommendation should reflect the need to provide for funding to development the plaza as it would be at its optimum, including landscaping. She would prefer to see Lot C enhanced rather than adding more activity to the Biltmore Site. She favored the idea of having access from 14th Street and away from 15th Street. Jerry Newton, 2041 Circle Drive, Hermosa Beach, task force member, stated that he favored the majority of the recommendations in the report. He stated that compromises � — P.C. Minutes 6/6/89 'were necessary in making the final task force recommendation. He stated that Beach. Drive was chosen as the boundary because of the problem with the utilities which run under Beach Drive. He stated that past discussions indicated that the return to the City on the sale of commercial space would be between $100 and $125 per square foot, or approximately $1.6 million. He stated that this information was given at a task force meeting; however, the task force did not address the issue of economic viability. Mr. Newton discussed the height, stating that his only objection with the staff recommendation and the task force itself was the idea of reducing the height from 35 to 30 feet. He noted that since 22 parking spaces will be lost, a compensation might be to retain the 35 -foot height limit, which would be consistent with the surrounding area. With the additional height, a commercial structure could provide additional parking on site. He.did not feel there would be problems with parking in a structure at night. Mr. Newton stated that the sense of the task force was to raise funds for the City; therefore, 'a compromise was reached between open space and commercial. He favored approval of the proposed recommendations. He continued by discussing the approaches taken by the task force in reaching their decision. George Schmeltzer, 515 24th Place, Hermosa Beach, task force member, stated that the people on the task force were all professionals and were very knowledgable. He stated that residential usage was not seriously considered. He discussed the staff recommendation, stating that Item 3, regarding a parking structure, is an issue for the City Council and was not even addressed by the task force. Mr. Schmeltzer, in response to a question from Comm. Peirce, stated that he feels parking should be provided on site for commercially zoned uses. He stated that the issue of a VPD arose after the task force discussions and is something that could be discussed by the City Council. Mr. Schmeltzer discussed Recommendation No. 4, stating that he feels money from the sale of the commercial portion, or from a lease, should be used for the creation and maintenance of a public park, rather than for parking as proposed. He noted that the task force wanted to ensure that funds would be available to create a public urban plaza and maintain it. Mr. Schmeltzer discussed Recommendation No. 5, orienting commercial development away from 15th Street, and stated that the task force did not address that issue in detail because it is a zoning matter which would be better addressed by the City Council. Mr. Schmeltzer stated that the majority of task force members welcomed the idea of a major restaurant at the site. Mr. Schmeltzer stated that the recommendation that a marketing survey be performed is an issue that should be addressed by the City Council. Mr. Schmeltzer discussed Recommendation 2, stating that several people feared there would be a massive project built at 15th Court. He said some favored having open space at that location; however, a compromise was reached on that area. He himself did not feel it makes any difference whether 15th Court is vacated or not. Mr. Schmeltzer stated that the task force did not discuss the issue of existing public parking on lots facing 15th Street. 9 P.C. Minutes 6/6/89 'Mr. Schmeltzer stated that the task force did not undertake a study to determine the' economic viability of the proposed commercial lots; however, speakers did.address the task force to address that issue, and those discussions were the basis upon which the task force made their recommendation. Mr. Schmeltzer stated that the task force felt it would be appropriate to leave to the City Council's• judgment the issue of whether or not to put on the ballot an issue relating to the impacts of commercial options. However, no formal recommendation was made by the task force on this matter. Mr. Schmeltzer felt that the most the Planning Commission can do is support the task force recommendation, with changes, and pass it along to the City Council with a broad - picture recommendation. He noted that there is not adequate time to do in-depth studies on each of the items. Patricia Hill, 841 Manhattan Avenue, Hermosa Beach, task force member, discussed the financial viability, and reminded the Commission that the task force recommendation to use the greatest proportion of that area as a public park was not a financial decision, it. was a value decision. She felt that that is the overriding context of the materials to be considered by the Commission. Ms. Hill stated that the fact that certain areas were suggested for commercial development was to facilitate the design and construction of the park plaza itself. Ms. Hill expressed deep concern over the proposed abandonment of 15th Court. She noted that the task force recommended retaining 15th Court to prevent a large development from occupying all of the commercially -designated lots. She was concerned that the work of the City staff has adulterated the task force recommendation, in that staff is recommending allowing a large restaurant. She stated that the retention of 15th Court was specifically to keep scale and density appropriate for the neighborhood. She stated that large-scale development would not be conducive to maintaining the character of the City. She noted concern over density, and said that the staff report recommending a large restaurant does not promote the concept of public land for public use. Ms. Hill discussed parking, stating that the task force listened to every imaginable potential use to decide which would be most favorable, and a parking lot was never even considered as a use. She stated that parking is a separate consideration which must be addressed by a different committee. She would consider parking on any portion of the Biltmore site only if there was a distinct Coastal Commission requirement for the 20 parking spaces. Tony DeBellis, 1421 Monterey Boulevard, Hermosa Beach, task force member, agreed with the speakers before him. He noted that several people have concerns over 15th Court; however, the task force tried to reach a compromise on that issue. He said there will always be problems if there is residential near commercial. He noted that economic viability was not an issue addressed by the task force. He noted that the height limit was also a compromise on the part of the task force. He said that the City has the ability to make the cost of the land affordable. Rosamond Fogg, 610 6th Street, Hermosa Beach, task force member, recalled the discussions held by the task force concerning 15th Court. She discussed the fact that it was proposed to divide Beach Drive; however, she opposed a vacation of 15th Court. She stated that some people felt that the area would be economically viable for .a —10— P.C. Minutes 6/6/89 commercial enterprise to have 15th included. She felt that if that were the case, residential use should be considered. Ms. Fogg urged the Commissioners to listen to the tapes of the task 'forc• e meetings, especially the testimony of Mr. LaPointe. She continued by discussing what he had to say in regard to economic viability. Ms. Fogg felt that individual considerations should now be set aside. She felt that there must be a reasonable balance between commercial development and residential integrity. Past trends show an atrophy in the downtown area, based partly on the parking situation. She felt that to pin all future hopes on a miracle project at the Biltmore site would be unrealistic, especially in light of the shifting consumer trends in the City. She noted that the downtown area has never been what one could consider - a thriving Commercial district. Ms. Fogg stated that basic questions need to be addressed, and the Commission should not be weighted down with precise numbers at this time. She urged the Commission to carefully consider the feasibility of all of the options before making a final. recommendation. Ms. Fogg, in response to a question from Comm. Edwards, gave background information as to what Mr. LaPointe told the task force during their meetings. George Schmeltzer, 515 24th Place, Hermosa Beach, noted that since the City actually owns this land, it can be as valuable as the City deems it to be. He felt there should have been a recommendation that any proceeds derived from that land should go toward the purchase of the railroad right-of-way. He noted that many uses were discussed by the task force: single-family residential with R-2 standards; open space; and a combination of open space and commercial. Ann Gubser noted that nine of the task force members agreed that open space is very important for this site; eight agreed to open space with some other arrangement. She stated that this is actually a value decision. Parker Herriott, Hermosa Beach, felt it was too bad that this issue is even being discussed. He noted that 1400 people signed a petition to have this site open space; now there is an attempt being made to sabotage the petition. He felt that ..the Council members have already told the Commission how to vote on this matter. Mr. Herriott discussed the four percent .utility tax in the City. He continued by discussing the purchase of the Biltmore site. Mr. Herriott felt that the Commission is wasting their time as well as everybody else's time, and he felt this is unfortunate. Mike Franzell, 15 15th Street, Hermosa Beach, discussed Recommendation No. 5, regarding the reorientation of commercial development away from 15th Street. He said that he would prefer to have the property either remain as it is, or have it be a park. He would then retain his ocean view. He felt a park would be a much better neighbor. Mr. Franzell questioned whether 15th Street could remain residential as it currently exists. He felt that the current proposal is appropriate; however, he would rotate the park 90 degrees so that it is perpendicular to The Strand, rather than parallel to it. He felt it is not appropriate to have 100 feet of open space right next to other open space. -- 11— P.C. Minutes 6/6/89 He felt that the recommendation is something that a majority of the citizens can agree upon, especially if it a combination of commercial and open space. Mr. Franzell asked what problems would be created by rotating that. area 90. degrees as he is proposing. Comm. Inge11. noted that it has been underneath Beach Drive. He stated, that would require moving the utilities or else mentioned that the utilities and sewers are to rotate the commercial on top of Beach Drive having a permanent easement over the utilities. Mr. Franzell noted there is a great deal of concern throughout the City over the hodge- podge planning throughout Hermosa Beach. He said it is important to retain both residential and commercial integrity, and he urged the Commission to make an attempt to do so. Mr. Schmeltzer felt that rotating the park is a great idea, noting that it would minimize the impact on 15th Street. There would be the same amount of open space, and the commercial would be on 14th Street. Hearing closed at 10:52 P.M. by Chmn. Rue. Comm. Peirce felt that this entire issue hinges on parking. The area east of the project is zoned commercial/recreation; therefore, the adjacent property to the east of these five lots is already possibly development oriented. The north side of 15th Street has R-3 residential, and it is not unusual to have R-3 very close to commercial zones. He felt that it would be a terrible waste of resources to put parking that close to The Strand. He favored a park on one portion of the site, and commercial on the other portion; however, to solve the parking problem, he felt that the parking should be.located off-site; i.e.,. Lot C. He did not want an in -lieu fee, though. He felt that a parking structure will be the only solution. He stated that lack of parking in the downtown area has been a problem for many years. Comm. Peirce stated that commercial viability is not the crucial issue issue since the City owns the property, and the value of the property lies in what the City wants to put on it. He felt that a quality commercial structure, such as a restaurant, along with the open space would be the appropriate use of the site. He would also favor 15th Court not being part of the project, explaining that that would break up the scale. He noted one of the issues the hotel opponents centered on was that the hotel would be out of scale with the rest of the downtown area. Comm. Peirce favored making a recommendation that the parking should be located further away from the beach, and the commercial property should be utilized as real commercial property near the beach. Comm. Ketz felt that 15th Street should be closed so that there is a unified development on that lot which is oriented towards 14th Street. She stated that landscaping would be appropriate on the 14th Street side to make it more compatible with the residential area. Comm. Ketz stated that if parking is required on site, the restaurant would need to be much smaller. She stated that money from the sale of the commercial property should go towards the urban park development and maintenance. She noted that a parking structure would be quite expensive, and she questioned whether a commercial development could pay for it. She had no preference as to which way the commercial development should be oriented; i.e., whether it is on The Strand or 15th Street. /2— P.C. Minutes 6/6/89 'Comm. Peirce felt that the park should be adjacent to The Strand, and the commercial. structure should be parallel to the Strand and in the back. He noted that from the streets on both sides from The Strand, there is a much larger visual appearance. A structure on the south side of the property would minimize the visual .impact of the.park, even though the park would be further away from the ocean. He felt it would be a disservice to put a building on 14th Street which would interrupt the flow of the site as one approaches from the Strand. Comm. Edwards asked whether the greenbelt has been paid for yet. Mr. Schubach stated that the City Manager would be better able to address that question. He stated that he could obtain further information to present to the Commission at a future meeting. He noted, however, that the utility tax will pay for that area. - Comm. Edwards felt that underground parking seems to be the only viable solution; however, he noted it would be quite expensive. He continued by asking about locations of other underground parking in the area. Mr. Schubach explained how subterranean parking could be achieved; however, he noted that it could not be underneath the open space area. Comm. Edwards felt that an issue which needs to be considered is the cost of underground parking. He also questioned whether the greenbelt would depend upon any income from this potential source of income. He also noted that it is important to determine what is desirable from a planning standpoint, stating that traffic impacts created by the various proposals need to be addressed. Mr. Schubach stated that traffic studies would need to be made after it has been determined what the use will be. However, he did not feel that traffic impacts would be substantial. Chmn. Rue commented on the alignment of the lots in question and stated that it would be desirable to create as minimal an impact as possible on utilities and various other uses. He felt that keeping Beach Drive as open space along with the rest of the parcel along the ocean would make sense. By developing commercial to the east, the commercial property would become more valuable and attractive since it would have an ocean view. He also felt this approach would create a lesser impact to the residential uses. He noted concern for the view. He stated that parking will be the main issue, noting that he feels underground parking would be the ideal solution; however, he did not think it would be economically feasible. Chmn. Rue felt that keeping parking at Lot C with a parking structure would lessen the traffic impacts. He questioned whether 14th Street could be used a pedestrian mall -type area. He strongly felt that the City Council needs to address the issue of subterranean parking. Chmn. Rue felt that the task force did a very good job in their studies and recommendations. He noted that the task force had covered almost all the issues being addressed, and the Commission is having the same problem the task force had with the constraints placed upon the project. Chmn. Rue felt it would be helpful in the future to have a viability study done on the site. — / 3 — P.C. Minutes 6/6/89 Comm. Ingell thought the Commission was to do an economic viability study. He noted that he is at a lot as to how to proceed. He stated that the City needs to determine how much income they want from this property and go from there.. • • Comm. Ingell felt that more precise information is necessary in order to determine the viability. Comm. Edwards agreed that additional information is necessary to determine the economic viability for the project. He felt it would be a mistake to proceed with a project where the City would have to pay out-of-pocket for a long period of time. He felt that a more concise economic study is necessary. He also felt it is important to have a'traffic analysis of the various alternatives. He felt that the Coastal Commission needs to be consulted as to options, including residential. He was not convinced at this time what the best option would be • from a planning viewpoint. He stated that he is not prepared at this time to choose any of the various options. Comm. Ingell questioned whether residential use and a small restaurant might be appropriate. He noted that he favored a hotel on the property in the past, explaining that he felt that would have been the most beneficial use for the downtown area. Comm. Ingell felt that the Planning Commission needs further direction from the Council in regard to what the Council would like to see on this property. Comm. Ketz noted that if a restaurant were to go in with no parking provision, and a parking structure is to be built elsewhere, the City would in essence be subsidizing the commercial restaurant. She did not feel this would be appropriate. Chmn. Rue stated that over the years he has had a preconceived notion that residential property ends up costing the City money; he asked whether this is true. He also asked whether commercial uses are more conducive to giving money back to the City. Kevin Northcraft, City Manager, explained that Chmn. Rue's question is a complex one without first doing substantial analysis. He noted, however, that in most cities, residential use does not pay for itself. The goal of most cities is to have commercial and other uses to have a balance in the community and to bring in visitor revenue to the city. Mr. Northcraft noted that because of the high property values in this City, homeowners pay more property tax than the statewide average. Mr. Northcraft discussed the issue of what the City Council is requesting the Commission to do at this time in regard to economic viability. He interpreted the Council's request to be for the Commission to determine whether this site would actually be feasible for commercial uses, considering the restrictions placed on the site, and whether commercial bids would be made which will be economically viable. He noted that the idea is not to obtain the most amount of money possible, but rather to have a compromise as noted by the task force. He felt that if there is decent commercial competition for the site, the funds should be adequate to pay for a first-class urban plaza. Mr. Northcraft discussed parking and stated that the issue of paying for parking with proceeds from the commercial site arose only as an alternative in the event the Coastal Commission requires the City to replace the lost parking spaces. Mr. Northcraft, in response to a question from Comm. Ingell regarding the cost of the park, stated that an outside, ballpark figure would be a half million dollars for a first- -- — P.C. Minutes 6/6/89 • rate park. He stated that maintenance costs would also include lighting and cleaning; however, he was hot aware of an exact maintenance cost at this time. He stated that if the' park is well-designed,• it would be planned with maintenance in mind. • He noted, however, that a well-designed park would draw people to the area, which would result in increased sales tax revenues to the City. • Comm: Ingell• asked questions about the cost of the parking spaces in relation to the amount of revenue which would be obtained from a commercial restaurant use. Comm. Peirce felt that the park should be in the front, the commercial 'use should be in the rear, and that parking should be provided by the developer on Lot C. Instead of an in -lieu •fee of $6,000 per space, the developer should be required to provide the required parking.. structure at Lot C; this would include, if necessary, the 22 parking spaces being lost on-site. Comm. Peirce did not feel the height limit is a major issue, stating he feels the height should be 35 feet, since that is the height limit of other surrounding buildings. He did not feel the five feet of difference in height is the major concern; parking is. Comm. Peirce stated that requiring parking on-site will result in either a very expensive subterranean parking structure with a building on top, or a very small commercial development with a lot of grade -level parking in the back, which he felt would look very bad for the area. He felt therefore that the developer must then agree to help provide a parking structure on Lot C. By making such a requirement, he merely wants to ensure that the City does not end up subsidizing the parking for a commercial development, because that would be unfair to the others in the downtown area. Comm. Peirce noted that this particular piece of property actually has no value because the City owns it. The value derives from the vision of what the City wants for this area in the future. He noted, therefore, that it is important to look to the future, rather than becoming obsessed with actual figures at this point. Comms. Ingell and Peirce debated the issue of the developer paying for the parking. Comm. Peirce asked whether a decision must be made on this matter tonight. Mr. Schubach stated that it could be continued one time only before it must go forward to the City Council. Comm. Peirce suggested that the matter be continued for two weeks so that the Commissions can fine tune their ideas to make a better recommendation. He suggested that some traffic information be provided; however, he did not think economic data which would be helpful could be provided in two weeks. Comm. Edwards wanted to ensure that this development, no matter what it finally is, creates no financial burden to the City. He felt that there are contingencies which need to be addressed so that the City does not have to bail a business out. He also felt that a traffic study is very important and should be addressed before making a recommendation. He also felt that additional information could be provided on the cost of subterranean parking in the area. Comm. Edwards felt that a continuance would allow time for the Commissioners to think these issues over, as well as allow staff time to provide the information requested. — /5-- P.C. Minutes 6/6/89 Comm. Edwards . favored continuing this item to the next meeting of the Planning Commission for the purpose of requesting staff to provide information on the following: (1) traffic impacts of the main options being proposed; (2) the cost of alternative parking and where it might be located; (3) contingencies and back-ups to protect the City in the. event a developer does not finish the project; (4) the reorientation of the park on the site; and (.5) the feasibility of on-site parking for the development. George Schmeltzer, 515 24th Place, asked that the Commissioners recall the professions and expertise of the people who served on the• task force. He reminded the Commission that the task force addressed the very questions now being discussed •by the Commission. He urged the Commission to listen to the tapes of• the. task force meetings. He also noted that mingtes are available for the meetings. He noted the importance of the Commission taking a broad view of the project, not focusing on the implementation details, which could encompass many, many meetings of discussion. Mr. Schmeltzer, in response to a question•from Comm. Ketz, stated that the task force did not address the issue of parking. Mr. Schmeltzer, in response to questions from Comm. Edwards regarding whether the task force addressed the issue of residential and commercial uses on this property, outlined the discussions held by the task force on this subject. Mr. Schubach felt that the Council is looking for a conceptual recommendation from the Commission, rather than one with detailed implementation methods and costs. Chmn. Rue stated that he has enough information at this time to make a recommendation; however, he had no objection to continuing this matter for two weeks. He stated that the more detailed aspects of developmentcan be addressed after a project is proposed. MOTION by Comm. Edwards, seconded by Comm. Ketz, to continue this item to the next meeting, June 20, for the purpose of obtaining from staff the information previously discussed. Comm. Edwards stated that he would like to read over the minutes and staff reports available. Comm. Ingell wanted information on the potential costs of policing the park. AYES: Comms. Edwards, Ingell, Ketz, Peirce, Chmn. Rue NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None — 6 — P.C. Minutes 6/6/89 June 1, 1989 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission June 6, 1989 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-6 & ZONE CHANGE 89-3 LOCATION: BILTMORE SITE, PUBICLY OWNED PORTION BETWEEN 14TH STREET AND 15TH STREET, AND THE STRAND (REFER TO ATTACHED MAP) INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO RECONSIDER BILTMORE SITE CITIZENS ADVISORY TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION (REFER TO ATTACHED EXHIBIT A FOR SPECIFICS), AND TO CONSIDER ALTERNATIVES. Recommendation Staff recommends the following: 1. The proposed commercial portion of the subject should be allowed to develop as one development. 2. The vacated portion of 15th Court should be included proposed commercial portion. 3. A parking structure on Lot C, or underground parking should be provided for replacement of the existing public parking on the subject property and to supplement parking on the proposed commercial lots. property with the 4. Money from the sale of the commercial portion or from a lease arrangement should be set aside for the parking structure. 5. Commercial development should be oriented away from 15th Street and all ingress and egress to the commercial lots should be from 14th Street. 6. A major restauarant should be the priority use of the commercial lots, and the City should do whatever possible to attract such a use. 7. A market study should be made to determine parking needs, as well as other market factors. Background At the March 20, 1989 meeting, the Task Force adopted a recommendation, and at the March 27th meeting, the language of the recommendation was approved. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of April 18, 1989, recommended adoption of the Task Force recommendation and further 10 recommended implementing said recommendation with a Specific Plan Area with the added provision that any commercial uses must be reviewed by the Planning Commission to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses. At the May 23, 1989, City Council meeting, the City Council referred this matter back to the Planning Commission to consider several issues of concern related to the Task Force recommendation which are as follows: 1. Existing public parking on lots facing 15th Street. 2. Economic viability of the proposed commercial lots. 3. Potential of a restaurant on part, or all of the proposed commercial portion. 4. High density, R-3, residential development along 15th Street in relation to the proposed commercial zoning for the two lots. 5. How does the initiative process impact commercial options. 6. What are the impacts of the following: a. 30 foot height limit b. Maintaining 15th Court publicly owned 7. Use of Public parking (lot C) and/or parking structures to provide parking for commercial development. 8. What type of restaurant could possibly be constructed under the constraints of the Task Force Recommendation. Analysis Existing Public Parking The loss of twenty (20) public parking spaces could become an issue before the Coastal Commission. Even if Parker Harriot's initiative passes, the issue of the public parking could be raised at the Coastal Commission public hearing to amend the Ceritfied Land Use Element. The possibility of providing additional parking at another location, such as a parking structure on Lot C, or parking under the open space, urban plaza, should be considered. If the property is sold, some of the funds could be set aside for providing additional parking. If the property is held in public ownership and leased, then, some of the rent, and sales taxes initially received over time should be set aside to ultimately develop a parking structure. Lots Facing 15th Street Two of the subject lots which face 15th Street abut residential development, and also face residential development on the north side of 15th Street If these lots were to be developed separately from the other subject lots, access would be from 15th Street. The traffic impact to this generally residential street could be significant. Also, the orientation of the commercial development would be interfacing with residential development. Therefore, it would be more desireable to have these lots developed in conjunction with the three subject lots facing 14th Street, and requiring ingress and egress, and orientation toward 14th Street. An alternative would be to rezone the subject lots on 15th Street to R-3 allowing residential rather than commercial development. Commercial Development and/or Restaurant Development The proposed commercial lots could be developed separately; however, the potential of development, and the value of the lots are directly related to the size of the lots. Small lots have much less potential for commercial development and consequently less value. Staff has conducted some research into developing a family oriented major chain restaurant on the subject property, e.g. Charlie Brown's, Rueben's, Red Onion. These types of restaurants generally want to be "over -parked", i.e. more than the City's zoning requirements. The floor area generally ranges from 7,000 to 10,000 square feet, and the total land area needed ranges from 40,000 to 70,000 square feet. Further, generally parking structures are not desireable because most business is conducted at night, and structures have related crime problems. Also, the profit margin does not warrent a parking structure. However, a variety of other factors are taken into consideration such as location and adjacent uses. These factors can overcome the general requirements as noted above. In relation to the subject site, the potential of a hotel adjacent on the south; the open space urban plaza; the unique beach, strand, ocean view; the high density population within walking distance; and the annual summer tourists, could all be priority factors which can overcome some of the general "rule of thumb" requirements for a major restaurant to locate on the commercial portion. Staff would believe, if the City desires attracting a major chain restaurant, the total area proposed for Commercial zoning should be made available. Therefore, the small vacated portion of 15th Court which was recommended to remain publicly owned should be made available for purchase and utilization in conjunction with the proposed Commercial lots. The total area would then equal 15,789 square feet. Based on the general need of 40,000 to 70,000 square feet of land area, some type of parking arrangement would be necessary. As _11_ noted perviously, funds either through taxes and lease of the property, or sale, could be set aside for some form of parking structure under the urban plaza, or on Lot C, and in addition to replacing the public parking, additional spaces could be provided for the restaurant. A market study would be useful to determine how much walk-in, and bicycle traffic could be expected, and thereby determine how much parking would be necessary. It would appear that a long term lease of the property would also be more viable than selling, since the City could control the up -front cost making it more desireable. For example, the City could request a certain amount needed for the parking structure, and make an adjustment on the monthly rent. It should be noted that the property is not in the Vehicle Parking District, however, a property owner may request to belong, and district boundaries could be widened to include the property. If the property were to be used by itself, Staff estimate that approximately 4,300 square feet of floor area could be developed with 43 on-site parking spaces on the entire portion proposed for commercial use. If only the portion between 14th Street and 15th Court were used, a maximum of 2,200 square feet with 22 parking spaces could be developed. Refer to attached schematics for details. Ballot Initiative If this matter were to be placed on the ballot and voted upon, the only recourse, the City would have if, for instance, the commercial zoned portion of the site were to be determined not viable for commercial uses, would be to place the matter back on the ballot at a later date with an alternative proposal; or it may be possible to place an alternative on the ballot, such as maintaining the property as public parking, if determined to be economically unfeasible as commercial. 30 Foot height Limitation The height limitation should not pose a serious impact to development of the subject property since three stories could be built within that height even though it is five feet less than the maximum permitted within the downtown, C-2 zoned area.i Michael Schubach Planning Director t/pcsrsite Illy NOLAI.103 'H. aiWy3£' '101 H1SON 3H1 1V 0NINNVd 3H1 iya\c MIME ).VW H3IHf1 3;dn13(M11S l;y01S 0f;1 k' NI DNI±1i1S SUNV 101 31UV1lah*' H1OS Lt+ JNI dv'd 3mo LV UM -WV 'JW SS0J0 AS ODE* = £tr ."""•""""" 03=LlAOild 0NI>I6t'd JS 001 N3d T Q3NII1D36 O!NDW d mss" SL' 2 9t'..........L:d.311H !- S101 D? V2SN 101 WHIEBEININIEES a b1 t4 12. r -1 T (.4 Fri c/) 3(23 rEM "1HT ! INT P.T _,+ 3�1t�lNf!�.c t33 1.5 -i -N IMO a am Ii SNVO 12 N0J 101 '3NI)I IHd ISI' i.-1VNV IIAVY V! S 1/4/38V DNI14I 3a L �— 301AN3S:13 i31I4 L, ld 41st ''`N L m _._._._._._.�.._._._._I ,* I I 1 r 1 L_•--•--•--•--•-� `—�ti Imo. r N. s! 11y (3NI1 A�311DI:i 3S OLLI i1 'Y 13A31 83ddn 11 1 f ! i I Saki 2J r i 803 101 Dtt71tl J�3 1 ; ` DM m 0$010111:::-11 1 I 1 1 1 JS 0££0 30 t13A31 83/1D1 • --- ----- )--- i P.1 NOlthi,103 v 411V83D iVII11 66-iE-L 30tltd iZZi -az '6V36 i» E)NIN d INTO 1V A80 S 31 NIS V Ni JNlJ i 1 3:J I'1r.i' IIT D f'TAv4J •1u�3uS wI u a vf sru JS WYE 12d I,,,,,,,,,,,,,'LL3LIIf1O] l DNI le71d J` 9068- (,\.1IJD S1D1 C:; N3dv !0-1 1••—: 1 1•"•i Y i :1-11 S LI 4_ r slm ?.I[:,d In-; r.ININN' d VJdV DNINIc1 ( 311 D NI J N) rINTO UT all -'d t N?V1d OIiFf'd 3OI A 83S/(•- 3}-;31i 1 l > 4 ..LJJJJ "I , 1' i TO: FROM: Michael Schubach, Plan ctor SUBJECT: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda Item #7 -- Reconsideration Site Task Force Recommendation DATE: June 26, 1989 of the Biltmore Attached please see the Planning Commission Minutes of June 20, 1989 regarding the reconsideration of the Biltmore Site Task Force recommendation. SUK L � CENTAL INFORMItin 1 RECONSIDERATION OF BILTMORE SITE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION CHANGING THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE ZONING OF THE PUBLICLY OWNED PORTION OF THE BILTMORE SITE FROM SPECIFIC PLAN AREA TO OPEN SPACE FOR THAT PORTION WEST OF BEACH DRIVE AND TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND C-2 FOR THAT PORTION EAST OF BEACH DRIVE BETWEEN 14TH STREET AND 15TH STREET (CONTINUED FROM MEETING OF JUNE 6, 1989) Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated June 14, 1989. At the June 6, 1989, meeting, the Planning Commission requested additional data on several issues: 1. Cost of underground parking 2. Traffic impact of commercial uses 3. Reorientation of proposed uses so that the open space is on the north and commercial is on the south 4. Contingency plan in the event the bidder fails half way through the project 5. On-site parking rather than remote 6. Cost of police patrol for park Cost of Underground Parking The cost of two levels of underground parking is approximately $34 to $40 per square foot. Beyond two levels, the cost will increase considerably. Based on the square foot cost of $40 per square foot, the price per space including turning area would be $13,600. Therefore, the cost for underground parking for a 7000 square foot family chain restaurant would be $952,000. Note that this estimate is based on the highest cost for underground parking and the minimum size restaurant. The cost would be less if, for instance, only one level of parking were underground, one level was at grade, and the restaurant was on the second level. Traffic Impact for Commercial Uses To determine what the impact would be for all of the potential commercial uses is not possible at this time. However, since a restaurant is a possible use and is one of the higher traffic generators, staff has computed the traffic impact based on a 7000 square foot restaurant. The average daily trip generation would be 669 trips per day. This figure should be tempered with the consideration of beach -goers, bicycle, and foot traffic which a restaurant in the subject location would attract. A conservative rule of thumb estimate would be about 25% of the clientele will be either foot/bike traffic and/or beach -goers. Reorientation of Proposed Uses By reorienting the proposed uses in a north/south rather than an east/west relationship, there are some benefits and some negatives. The openness and view of the urban plaza from the Strand is lots; the plaza becomes long and narrow. The commercial area would have the utilities under Beach Drive, running approximately through the middle of it. A most recent estimate of relocating the utilities was $2,000,000. 1 P.C. Minutes 6/20/89 The benefit of such a reorientation would be to limit the impact to the residential views along 15th Street and the possible traffic impact of commercial development. The plaza would act as a buffer to the residential along 15th Street interfacing with commercial. The view from the commercial area may be enhanced in some respect since development could abut the Strand rather than be set back 100 feet. Windows on three sides, a broader visual angle of the beach, and a closer view of the pedestrians along the Strand would result. Contingency Plan There is no absolute way to guarantee that a developer will not go "belly up." However, contractual agreements developed by the City Manager and City Attorney can certainly provide some guarantee that the City will not be left "holding the bag." What the guarantee will be cannot be determined at this time, but since the City owns the property it has a great deal of control and options in negotiating a sale or lease. On -Site Parking The commercial area is approximately 16,000 square feet. Approximately 23,800 square feet would be needed to provide 70 parking spaces for a 7000 square foot restaurant. 16,000 square feet is adequate for two levels of parking, totaling 23,800 square feet. A combination of at -grade, above -grade, and/or below -grade could be utilized. Two levels above -grade cost slightly less than the below -grade, $30 to $34 per square foot, or approximately $809,200 for 70 spaces. Police Patrol Depending on the situation, the cost of police patrol could be zero to $300,000. If the urban plaza does not become an attraction to the homeless, drug peddlers, and panhandlers, then the cost would be absorbed; it would just become a part of the current police patrol. However, if it does become an attraction, then the current district would be split, a patrol service would result, and the cost (one man, 24-hour service) could be $300,000. Comm. Ingell asked for clarification on the 669 trips per day as mentioned by staff. Mr. Schubach stated that the figure represents vehicles, not passengers. He stated that studies indicate an average of 2.3 persons per vehicle. He explained that the figure of 669 was derived from the engineering handbook section on trip generation for a quality restaurant. Comm. Ingell stated that the figures seems to be approximately 25 percent less than the number of vehicle trips which would actually be made. He did a survey on his own and the number of cars seems very low. Mr. Schubach explained that staff's figure is a very conservative estimate. Mr. Schubach noted that many people walk, ride their bikes, or arrive via various other methods, especially during the summer months. Customers, therefore, would not be driving to the area exclusively to go to the restaurant; rather, they would be coming to the area for other purposes, parking in the public parking lot, and then walking to the restaurant. Comm. Ingell asked about the potential cost of maintaining an urban plaza. 2 P.C. Minutes 6/20/89 Mr. Schubach had no exact figures on park maintenance; however, he stated that he could ask the Public Works Director for that information. Comm. Edwards passed out copies of graphs he prepared showing the past election results on the Biltmore site. He discussed at length his opinion of the community consensus on this issue. He noted that most voters in Precinct 4 favored residential development on the Biltmore site. City-wide, however, residential usage was voted down. He continued by explaining what various precincts favored according to the election results. Comm. Peirce stated that it is not possible to interpret the voting record accurately in regard to who favored commercial versus residential development if one takes into account only the last election. He felt Comm. Edwards should have obtained results from previous elections on this matter. He did not feel it would be fair to discard previous election results when making such a presentation. Comm. Edwards continued by stating it is his opinion that residents in Precinct 4 appeared to favor residential development. He felt that commercial development would be less desirable in that particular area, based on the traffic factors; therefore, he tended to favor residential development. Comm. Edwards noted that open space costs money due to policing and maintenance. Commercial development would require building parking, and unless the property is sold outright for commercial development, there would not be any immediate income. He stated that many concessions would need to be made by the City for someone to come in and develop the site commercially. He felt that residential could be sold fairly easily, and the property is currently very valuable based on real estate trends. He felt that residential would be the most favorable use of the site. Comm. Edwards stated that the Biltmore site as open space would be of marginal value since it is right at the beach. Comm. Edwards stated that if the property is sold for residential usage, the income could be used to pay for improving open space. He noted that it has not been mentioned before that residential funding could be used for the open space. Comm. Edwards said that part of the funds could be used to provide additional parking for the beach area. Comm. Edwards felt that several million dollars could be made if the lots were sold for residential. He stated that a commercial development would provide approximately $30,000 per year in revenue, far less than what could be obtained from a residential sale. Hearing opened at 10:37 P.M. by Chmn. Rue. Patricia Hill, 841 Manhattan Avenue, Hermosa Beach, task force member, stated that staff's recommendation is very different from the recommendations given by the task force, and the staff recommendation is an absolute distortion. She expressed concern over staff recommendation No. 6: "A major restaurant should be the priority use of the commercial lots, and the City should do whatever possible to attract such a use." She said that the task force did not make such a recommendation; on the contrary, they added particular conditions to prevent that type of aggregation of property for a "major restaurant" on the Biltmore site. She stressed that the task force was discussing a "major urban plaza," not a "major restaurant." 3 P.C. Minutes 6/20/89 Ms. Hill stated that, instead of planning for the most beneficial use of open space, staff's recommendations would introduce an enormous traffic impact, outscale development, and all of the things open space was chosen to ameliorate. This was to be a public use of public land for open space. The task force recommended nothing which would enable or encourage a commercial use such as a major restaurant. Ms. Hill voiced strong concern over staff recommendation No. 4: "Money from the sale or lease of the commercial portion or from a lease arrangement should be set aside for the parking structure." She stated that the task force recommended a commercial designation for a smaller portion of the overall site to demonstrate a financial responsibility and as a way of supporting the design and installation of the urban plaza itself. For this money not even to be used for the site itself would eviscerate the very recommendation for that open site. She stated that such an action would orphan the entire project upon which a consensus was reached on the Biltmore site. Ms. Hill stated that staff's recommendations are very disturbing, and they do not reflect what was recommended by the Biltmore Site Task Force Committee. Mr. Schubach clarified that staff's recommendations were not based on the task force recommendations. He stated that staff was requested to look into what would be the most economically feasible use of the site; the task force recommendations were not the most economically feasible. He said that the Coastal Commission would most likely take issue with removing public parking and not replacing it; therefore, a recommendation was made in regard to the parking. He noted that staff's recommendations were never intended to reflect those made by the task force. Catherine Bergstrom, 32 21st Street, Hermosa Beach, task force member, discussed the past history of the Biltmore site and past election results in regard to the matter. She continued by discussing the passage of Proposition J, which stated that the City would find means to purchase the right-of-way. She discussed the utility tax, noting that the right-of-way has not yet been paid for. Ms. Bergstrom stated that staff attended the task force meetings, and staff made their viewpoints known; staff's recommendations, however, were rejected by the task force. Ms. Bergstrom stated that it was clear that four issues needed to be addressed at the time of formulating the recommendation: (1) the environmental impact; (2) the economic impact; (3) the political impact; and (4) the social impact. Ms. Bergstrom felt that single-family residential use would be the highest and best use of the land. She stated that no studies have been done in the past in regard to the impacts of residential usage. Ms. Bergstrom continued by discussing the possibility of having a school or additional parking at the site. Ms. Bergstrom asked for clarification on the timing of this issue and placing it on the ballot. She asked whether another public hearing would be held on this matter. Mr. Schubach stated that the City Council would hold a public hearing. Ms. Bergstrom stated that the idea of a buffer zone has worked in the City. She noted that people want to live in the City so badly that they are willing to put up with many annoyances such as traffic, litter, parking problems, and noise. She stated that a mix of commercial and residential has worked in the past. 4 P.C. Minutes 6/20/89 Ms. Bergstrom made two recommendations for the Commissioners' consideration: (1) that the Commission recommend twelve single-family homes; or (2) recommend that the task force recommendation be placed on the ballot. Gerry Compton, 200 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, felt that the site should be zoned at its highest economical value, which is probably residential, and then sold with that zoning. If the City is going to retain the property, then commercial use should be done with a long-term land lease, therefore, providing the City with income on the property. He stated that this land is probably the City's most valuable possession at this time. If the land is sold to a developer, the City would then have no future income. He suggested that the City hold on to the land because he feels the value will go even higher. Unless the City is going to sell it as residential, he urged that it be leased as commercial. Mr. Compton discussed using the site as open space as recommended by the task force. He noted deep concern over an open space plaza, stating that it could become home to bums and other undesirables. He noted that the Redondo Pier attracts many outsiders and after a big weekend, there is a terrible mess which the city has to clean up. He felt that the cost of maintaining an urban plaza could be prohibitive. He felt that social and economical issues have not been adequately addressed for an urban plaza. Mr. Compton noted that if there is commercial development adjacent to an urban plaza, there would at least be a business constantly on watch for any problems. He stressed that any plaza must have constant patrol or there could be real problems. Richard Sullivan, 3rd Street, Hermosa Beach, was surprised that residential did not win when this item was placed on the last ballot. He felt that the City tried to confuse people by placing three measures on the ballot. At this time, he would favor any use except open space, noting that this site is adjacent to the beach. He stated that proceeds from the sale of this property could help pay for the greenbelt. He cautioned that property values will be down in the future. The City should now concentrate on obtaining the best return on this site. He noted concern over providing adequate protection if the site is open space. Hearing closed at 10:59 P.M. by Chmn. Rue. Comm. Ingell made several observations: (1) this is one of the choicest residential potential or general commercial sites in the City, an asset valued between seven and ten million dollars, with a potential property tax revenue of $70,000 to $100,000 a year if it was sold; (2) everyone wants less traffic and more open space; (3) there is an initiative on the ballot that, if passed, would turn this asset into a liability of over one half million dollars to construct in addition to over $330,000 per year to maintain; (4) the City Council fears this initiative may pass; (5) the task force has compromised the open space initiative into a slightly lesser liability that will probably appease the masses, but the question is whether this proposal would be good planning, not just a good compromise (he did not believe so); (6) if the City wants open space, this is definitely not optimum planning; (7) if the City sold the Biltmore site, it could use the money to purchase several parcels in "our" neighborhoods to be converted into open space, which would be more desirable than adding to "everyone's" open space at the beach; (8) inter -neighborhood parks would be much easier to control than a park at the beach where there are already transient problems, drinking problems, and drug problems; (9) everyone ends up paying for enforcement problems; (10) he wanted open space too, but if he is going to pay for it, he does not want to provide open space for everyone in Southern California; (11) this view might not be a great compromise to an open space ballot measure, but if presented well to the citizens he felt they too will see it as better planning for Hermosa Beach; (12) 5 P.C. Minutes 6/20/89 remember, half of the voters wanted development. Comm. Ingell stated that he strongly favors either residential development or a commercial lease on the Biltmore site. He appreciated the input from the task force; however, he could not support their recommendation for open space. Comm. Ingell recommended that two issues placed on the ballot: (1) the highest and best use, which would be 12 residential lots; and (2) a commercial lease situation. He favored eliminating the open space alternative altogether. Comm. Peirce felt that the highest and best use from a City standpoint and for the best return on the investment of the property as well as from a future impact on the City standpoint would be a hotel; however, he noted that most people feel the City cannot support that. Therefore, he favored the option of open space adjacent to a restaurant as being the best and highest use for the property. Comm. Peirce felt that, if the City can add restrictions to the restaurant adjacent to the urban plaza area, it would add value to the downtown area as well as the restaurant and the park itself. Comm. Peirce recommended vacating 15th Street; asked that the City Council put on the ballot a proposition that has some restrictions on the commercial development of the property; that setbacks be initiated on the ground floor (10 feet), first floor (15 feet), and second floor (twenty feet); that there be a maximum height limit of 30 feet; that the building be only three stories high; that the building be stepped back to reduce the bulk. Whether it is one or two restaurants can be left to the discretion of the City. Putting parking on the site is not the best thing to do; however, if the developer wants to, he can add parking on-site. He recommended that the restaurant not be allowed to join the Vehicle Parking District because it would overburden the City's already overcrowded lots. The developer could erect a parking structure on Lot C if so desired, or the developer could place parking on the site. Comm. Ketz agreed with Comm. Peirce, stating that the task force explored many possibilities; however, she felt a commercial use (restaurant) would be the best and highest use since the site is in the downtown area and is near the City parking lots. She felt that some open space adjacent to the restaurant would be desirable. She favored vacating 15th Street. She felt the revenue from leasing the commercial site should be used for the park plaza. She felt that there should be restrictions on the commercial development so that it is not too bulky, therefore creating negative impacts on the area. Chmn. Rue expressed his opinions: (1) he originally favored a hotel; however, that option has been eliminated; (2) residential use would provide a source of revenue from the property taxes; (3) residential can be sold for a great amount of money, which can be used to purchase open space along the right-of-way and possibly to provide parking in other areas of the City. He recommended putting two measures on the ballot: (1) residential use, and (2) the task force recommendation. Chmn. Rue stated that he tends to favor R-1 residential use for this site. Comm. Edwards voiced his ideas: (1) the task force recommendation appears to be financially shaky; (2) from a planning point of view, it is a toss up between commercial and residential use; (3) from a traffic view point, he would favor residential; (4) from a planning view, even residential appears to be the best use. He agreed that a commercial development adjacent to a park would tend to monitor the park area; however, he felt 6 P.C. Minutes 6/20/89 residents would do the same thing. As a compromise situation, he tended to agree with the task force recommendation to have open space adjacent to the beach and commercial on the other portion. He felt that a commercial usage is a shaky grounds. He did not feel that the income from a commercial lease would be as high as projected by staff. He recommended putting two measures on the ballot: (1) residential; and (2) open space, as recommended by the task force. Comm. Edwards favored residential development at the Biltmore site. Comm. Peirce stated that issues such as traffic, noise, and smoke are environmental impacts, not planning matters. He stated that planning is the vision of what is desired for the future of the City. The first consideration should be for the land use, not how much money can be made. He felt that the decision should be based on what will be in the best interests of the City twenty or thirty years from now. He therefore felt that the approach being taken in regard to this matter is backwards. MOTION by Comm. Ingell, seconded by Comm. Edwards, to recommend that two measures be placed on the ballot: (1) That the 12 residential R-1 lots be sold for the highest bid, proceeds of which should be earmarked for: (a) acquisition of the greenbelt, (b) acquisition and maintenance of residential parks in the City, (c) a parking structure in the downtown area, and (d) environmental improvements in the City; (2) The Biltmore Site Task Force recommendation. AYES:Comms. Edwards, Ingell, Chmn. Rue NOES:Comm. Ketz, Peirce ABSTAIN:None ABSENT:None (MOTION PASSES) Mr. Vose explained, in response to a question from Chmn. Rue, that the ballot measure with the highest number of votes will prevail; if they all have a prevailing negative vote, none would prevail. He stated that there must be a fifty -percent margin for one measure to win. Comm. Edwards asked whether there could be a "winner -take -all" situation. Mr. Vose explained that if there is less than fifty percent, there can be no "winner -take - all" situation. Mr. Compton suggested that it be recommended, in the event of a run-off, that the two prevailing measures be placed on the next ballot for determination so that a final decision can finally be reached. MOTION by Chmn. Rue to recommend that, in the event of a run-off election, the two prevailing measures be placed on the ballot. Comm. Peirce suggested that this issue now be sent to the City Council for their determination. (MOTION DIES FOR LACK OF A SECOND.) 7 P.C. Minutes 6/20/89 Catherine Bergstrom stated that this will be the first time that the measures being placed on the ballot in regard to the Biltmore site are clear-cut options which have been studied and which do not involve a hotel. Chmn. Rue stated that this matter will now be sent forward to the City Council for their final determination. 8 P.C. Minutes 6/20/89 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting June 27, 1989 EXTENSION OF REFUSE CONTRACT WITH BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council enter into an exclusive contract with Browning-Ferris Industries for the removal of residential and commercial refuse generated within the city. BACKGROUND On January 24, 1989, the City Council directed staff to negotiate a five year extension to the current contract for refuse removal with Browning-Ferris Industries. Several items were examined to increase levels of service or reduce city costs. ANALYSIS The items to increase the level of service or reduce city costs will be examined individually. 1) Inclusion of refuse pickup at city facilities at no cost to the city. A subsidy of approximately 4% or $.34 monthly for each single family residence would be necessary to create a no cost situation for the city. Staff is not recommending that this subsidy be included in the rate schedule since the rates already include a significant franchise fee of 10%. The franchise fee generates enough revenue to pay for refuse pickup at city facilities and provide an additional $70,000.00 in funds. 2) Replacement of once monthly large item pickup with weekly service. This significant improvement of service to residents can be accomplished without additional cost to the city and is included in the proposed contract. Residents will be able to discard large items in conjunction with the regularly scheduled pickup. Additional benefits include eliminating staff time to arrange and control the monthly large item pickup and decreased liklihood of large items in view for several weeks awaiting the monthly pickup. 3) Possible pickup of public refuse containers located throughout the city. Staff is recommending that this item receive further study to determine if it is cost effective and would provide an appropriate level of service. Staff does not feel that it would be appropriate for residents and businesses to subsidize this service so the terms need not be included in the contract. Language indicating agreement by the parties to examine this issue further is included in the proposed contract. 4) Provision of a household hazardous waste hotline. A toll free telephone number to provide information regarding appropriate sources for household hazardous waste disposal is scheduled for implementation by the end of August 1989. Appropriate disposal of household hazardous waste benefits everyone. This service is provided at no additional cost to the city. 5) Use of alternate large capacity refuse receptacles for residential accounts. The large capacity receptacles are typically 60 to 90 gallon containers, equipped with wheels, and are serviced by lift equipment located on the truck. They cannot be manually emptied. Advantages of the larger capacity receptacles include reduced worker and resident injuries (no lifting), secure lids, tip resistant, convenience and aesthetically they are more pleasing. Disadvantages include cost of the cart, difficulty in siting the larger container and difficulty in use on sloping terrain or over stairs. City staff and Browning-Ferris Industries staff do not believe the system is well suited to mandatory use throughout the city due to the hilly topography and densely developed conditions. The Contractor has agreed to examine establishing a voluntary use program for the large capacity receptacles and that language is reflected in the proposed contract. 6) Recycling. Whether via a curbside collection program or a drop-off center is viewed as an important component to the solution of the solid waste crisis. Clearly, recycling alone will not negate the need for additional landfills or improved technology to handle our increasing solid waste dilemma. Recycling can provide a significant reduction in the waste stream with the added benefit of improved use of available resources. The results of our recycling feasibility survey (see background information) indicate that an overwhelming majority of respondents feel that recycling will help solve disposal problems. A significant number of respondents currently recycle in some manner with cans the most often recycle material. Understandably, the survey indicated that curbside recycling would have the most participants. Unfortunately curbside recycling programs require a substantial commitment in terms of time and capital to implement. Typical costs of a curbside recycling program would require a subsidy of $1.75 to $2.25 monthly per single family residence. The survey responses and particularly the comment section, did not indicate strong support for a surcharge of that magnitude. Browning-Ferris Industries staff is recommending a conservative approach to beginning recycling efforts in the city by initially implementing a drop-off center. The small size of the city in terms of area appear to make Hermosa Beach well suited to this type of program. Browning-Ferris Industries has agreed to provide the bins necessary for a drop-off center and to haul the materials to buy back centers at no charge. They would also pick up nonrecyclable items inadvertantly brought to the site by citizens. Site location and site improvements would be the responsibility of the city. Operation of the drop-off center could be supervised by city employees or volunteer groups, depending on the site selected. Drop-off material would not be purchased and the revenue derived from the material would be used to support a specific city project (open space acquisition or park enhancement) or would be used to support the volunteer groups programs. Staff believes that this approach is appropriate as it allows the city to become involved in recycling without a major expenditure of funds. If strong support is evident for recycling, additional programs can be considered in the future. The language in the proposed contract indicates that the intention is to pursue a drop-off center provided a suitable site can be located. Specifics of any program would be brought before the city council for additional review and approval. 7) Waste oil pickup. Browning-Ferris Industries has agreed to implement a waste oil pickup program for a trial 12 month period at no cost to the city. The program would use discardable containers set out for pickup at the same time as regular refuse pickup. 3 The used motor oil would be placed in holding tanks on the trucks and ultimately sent to a recycling facilities. Actual use and costs involved in the program would be examined at the end of the 12 month period to determine the terms of continuing the program if appropriate. Staff believes that this convenient method of used oil disposal will significantly reduce the unauthorized disposal of waste oil by burying or disguising the used oil in regular refuse. 8) Use of equipment able to negotiate narrow alley allowing for alley refuse pickup. Browning-Ferris Industries will replace a side -load vehicle with a rear -load vehicle which will enable service on narrow alleys. The rear -load vehicles have superior turning radius and better access to the dumping bin. This improvement in service is proposed at no additional cost to the city. 9) Refuse Rate Adjustment. All of the increases in levels of service are proposed to be provided without additional cost to the service users. A rate increase is proposed and recommended to allow for increases in the cost of the contractor conducting business. The rate adjustment proposed was formulated using criteria contained in the current refuse contract. Current and past contracts have contained provisions for annual rate adjustments in accordance with The Consumer Price Index (Transportation Group) annual percentage rate increase. The Consumer Price Index (Transportation Group) for the period of April 1988 to April 1989 increased 8.0%. In addition, disposal costs at Los Angeles County landfills continue to rise. There has been a 22% increase in disposal rates since July 1, 1988 including a 6% increase as recently as January 1, 1989. Since June, 1987 landfill disposal costs have risen a staggering 65%. In order to continue at the same revenue level, a rate increase of 4.42% is needed to offset the 22% increase in disposal costs. Combining that increase with the 8% Consumer Price Index on revenues other than disposal costs results in a proposed rate increase of 10.87%. Staff believes that the proposed rate increase is justified and appropriate. The proposed rate for Hermosa Beach ($8.02 per month for single family residences) would still be among the lowest in the South Bay (see rate survey). SUMMARY The proposed refuse contract provides for significant increases to the level of refuse removal services for the citizens of Hermosa Beach. Specific improvements include the following: 1) Large item pickup as part of the weekly service. 2) Household hazardous waste hotline. 3) Waste oil pickup. 4) Equipment suitable for narrow alley use. In addition, several items will be examined for implementation if appropriate including: 1) Pickup by contractor of public refuse containers located throughout the city. 2) Use of alternate large capacity refuse receptacles for residential accounts. 3) Drop-off recycling center. The proposed refuse rate increase of 10.8770 would still result in rates for Hermosa Beach among the lowest in the South Bay. Respectfully submitted, a„ William Grove, Director Dept. of Building & Safety Concur: evin B. NorthyErft City Manager CITY MANAGER COMMENT: Having been involved in a voluntary large capacity receptacle program, I believe that such a program will be quite popular with our citizens. A video is available to explain the benefits of the program. Regarding recycling, we definitely can be doing more as a community as the survey reflects. We need to build on current efforts and not simply substitute for them. Accordingly, it is appropriate to consider current volunteer scavengers and non-profit group recycling fund-raising in our planning. 5 REFUSE CONTRACT - 1989 THIS AGREEMENT made this day of, 1989, between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Browning-Ferris Industries of Califor- nia, Inc., a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR". WHEREAS, on the 16th day of June 1970, CITY and ABCO Disposal Corporation did enter into an Agreement for Refuse Collection in the City of Hermosa Beach ("Refuse Contract"), which Refuse Con- tract was amended by Amendment No. 1 on the 8th day of May, 1971; Amendment No. 2 on the 21st day of November, 1972; Amendment No. 3 on the 2nd day of January, 1974; Amendment No. 4 on the 1st day of August, 1978; and was restated on the 25th day of August, 1981; and WHEREAS, a new agreement was entered into on March 11, 1986; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the parties to replace the current contract with this Agreement which shall supercede previous agreements; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the parties hereto to provide the refuse collection service in accordance with the rules, regula- tions and specifications set forth in this Agreement and at all times during the term of this Agreement to comply with all ap- plicable CITY ordinances and further to perform each covenant and agreement contained herein in an efficient and businesslike man- ner; and WHEREAS, the CONTRACTOR realizes that it is acting on behalf of the CITY in providing the service of refuse collection and as such it will always direct its employees to conduct themselves in accordance with the standards of conduct required of CITY em- ployees and furthermore to utilize generally accepted public relations techniques in the performance of duties; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to provide for a method of reasonable increases or decreases as they may be justified during the life of the contract; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Agreement to give the CONTRACTOR the exclusive right to pick up refuse from all locations in CITY. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Term of Agreement The term of this Agreement shall commence on the 1st day of July, 1989, and end on the 30th day of June, 1994, and may be renewed for an additional five (5) years at the exclusive discretion of the CITY upon terms and conditions mutually agreed upon by both parties. 2. Duties of CONTRACTOR The CONTRACTOR promises to perform its duties in good and work- manlike manner in strict compliance with the Rules, Regulations and Specifications for the Collection of Refuse, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. Rates and Franchise Fee A. Schedule of Rates. The parties agree that CONTRACTOR shall, for the term of this Agreement, cause to be billed and col- lected all charges made or incurred by Residential, Apart- ment, Commercial, Manufacturing, and all customers in the City of Hermosa Beach, and in this regard CONTRACTOR agrees that no free service (except as approved by CITY) will be granted and all services rendered shall be billed in accor- dance with the rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. B. Franchise Fee. CONTRACTOR, as part of the consideration of this Agreement, agrees to pay to CITY at the time and in the manner set forth in Paragraph E below, a sum equal to ten percent (10%) of the Gross Receipts for providing refuse ser- vice within the city. C. Definition of Gross Receipts. "Gross Receipts". as referred to in Paragraph B hereina ove, is defined as all monies col- lected as a result of the billing for all services rendered pursuant to this Agreement and any subsequent amend- ments,except that CONTRACTOR agrees pursuant to Paragraph A above, that no free service will be granted (except as ap- proved by CITY); AND, further, CONTRACTOR agrees that all services granted will be duly and regularly billed; and, fur- ther, except that CONTRACTOR shall make a diligent effort to assure that all billings made and performed shall be col- lected by CONTRACTOR and that no billing shall be deemed un - collectable until all reasonable remedies for the collection thereof have been exhausted. In accordance with the CITY's Ordinance No. 80-644, CONTRACTOR shall bill the Property Owner for all services already rendered and not otherwise collected. D. Lien Provision. The CITY agrees to cooperate with the CONTRACTOR in placing bills deemed uncollectable pursuant to Paragraph C hereinabove on the property tax bill as a lien. The CONTRAC- TOR shall be responsible for any process or fees necessary to accomplish the lien. If the CITY incurs any costs as a result of placing uncollec- table bills on the property tax bill, the CONTRACTOR agrees to reimburse the CITY for said costs. E. Time of Payment to City: CONTRACTOR shall pay to CITY the amounts owed pursuant to Paragraph B above on or before the 90th day following the billing date, and each 30 days thereafter on monies collected. 4. Re -Negotiation of Rates The rates which may be charged by CONTRACTOR and the fees which are to be paid by CONTRACTOR to CITY for the second and subse- quent years of the term of this Agreement, and any extensions thereof, shall be adjusted by an amount up to the percentage rate as reflected in the Consumer Price Index (Transportation Group) Los Angeles - Anaheim - Riverside area as published in April of each year by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), not to exceed ten percent (10%) annually, with such adjustments to be effective July 1 of each year. CON- TRACTOR shall provide CITY true and correct copies of the CPI which reflects the percentage increase to verify the rate adjust- ment. In addition to the above, CONTRACTOR may petition the CITY at any time for additional rate and price adjustments at rea- sonable times on the basis of unusual changes in cost of opera- tions, such as revised laws, ordinances, or regulations; changes in location of disposal sites or changes in disposal charges; and for other reasons. 5. Number of Units CONTRACTOR will be notified of all new or changed occupancies as CITY becomes aware of same through issuance of its Certificate of Occupancy. 6. CONTRACTOR's Exclusive Right to Service Apartment Complexes, Commercial and Industrial and Professional Establishments A. In accordance with the duties of the CONTRACTOR set forth in Section 2 above, no pick up schedule shall be less than those provided in the rules, regulations, and specifications. CONTRACTOR, at no cost to the CITY, shall make direct billing and collect payment for its services from such Establishment. B. CONTRACTOR will furnish and service trash compactors for any of CONTRACTOR's Commercial and Apartment Complex customers, if desired by such customer, on terms to be mutually desired by such customer, on terms to be mutually agreed upon by CONTRACTOR and such Commercial or Apartment Complex customer. 7. Default A. In the event of default by either party of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the other party shall give Notice in writing setting out such default, served in accor- dance with Section 10 set forth hereinafter, and if said de- fault is not cured within thirty (30) days of the date of mailing said Notice, then in addition to any other legal remedy, the following specific remedies are available: 1) Injunction relief or damages. 2) In the event of a default or defaults not cured within thirty (30) days, then such default or defaults shall be presumed to be a major breach of contract and this Agreement may be terminated by the injured party. 3) In the event the CONTRACTOR defaults and fails to rea- sonably perform the services required of the CONTRAC- TOR, to Apartment Complexes, Commercial, Industrial and Professional Establishments, the CITY Council may issue additional licenses to pick up said Establishments and terminate the exclusive right of the CONTRACTOR to negotiate with and serve said Apartment Complexes, Com- mercial, Industrial and Professional Establishments. 4) In the event of litigation, the successful party shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney fees. 8. Non -Discrimination Clause CONTRACTOR shall not discriminate in matters of hiring or other matters on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex or marital status; nor shall he have business dealings with a person, firm or corporation who so discriminates. 9. Insurance and Bonds A. Liability Insurance. Additionally to and independently of all other provisions of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall, at its own cost and expense forthwith after the execution hereof, procure a policy or policies of comprehensive public liability and property damage insurance, with limits of not less than $1,000,000.00 for injuries to or death of any one (1) person and $2,000,000.00 for injuries to or death of any two (2) or more persons, and $250,000.00 for damage to one (1) individual's property and $500,000.00 for two (2) or more persons' property damage. The terms of said policies may be for such period as shall be designated by CITY; provided, however, CONTRACTOR shall procure other policies of said in- surance so that between the execution of this Agreement and commencement of the Agreement, and throughout the entire con- tract term or any renewal thereof, or until the sooner ter- mination thereof,CONTRACTOR shall always have such required insurance coverage. Certificates of said insurance, together with the receipts for the payment of premiums for the term thereof, shall be delivered to CITY within ten (10) days after the execution of this Agreement, and thereafter within thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the term of each such policy. Said policies shall contain a "non -cancellation without notice" clause and shall provide that copies of all cancellation notices shall be sent to CITY. To the extent 4 permitted by law CONTRACTOR may provide for all or part of the required insurance under a plan of self-insurance. B. Bonds. CONTRACTOR shall post with the CITY and keep in full o�and effect during the term of this Agreement a Perfor- mance Bond issued by a nationally recognized surety company which will guarantee the full and faithful performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement in an amount equal to $50,000.00. C. Workers' Compensation. The CONTRACTOR shall at all times keep fully insured, at his own expense, all persons employed by it in connection with this Agreement as required by the "Workers' Compensation Insurance and Safety Act" of the State of California. CONTRACTOR shall at any time, upon demand, produce to the CITY Manager evidence that it is fully and properly insured as required by said act. 10. Definitions CITY shall mean the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CONTRACTOR shall mean Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., or its successor in interest. REFUSE shall mean all waste from and incidental to the use of homes, residences, dwelling units, commercial or professional establishments including, but not limited to, newspapers, maga- zines, wrappings, discarded clothing, empty packing cases, pack- ing material such as paper, hay, straw, shavings, excelsior, met- als, bottles, ashes broken glass garbage, garden and yard trim- mings, leaves, and other household refuse. Not included in the definition of refuse is any dead animal, dirt or earth. Construction or industrial waste materials such as plaster, lumber, bricks, tiles, or fixtures, resulting from building construction, alterations, or manufacturing processes shall not be considered household refuse when in excess of seven- ty-five (75) pounds in total weight and not contained in an ap- proved refuse container. SPECIAL REFUSE shall mean furniture, appliances, television sets, water heater tanks, refrigerators, stoves, davenports, sinks, lawn furniture, doors, windows, screens, mattresses, beds, rugs and pads, which are incidental to family living and which may exceed seventy-five (75) pounds in weight and/or forty-eight (48) inches in length. MISCELLANEOUS REFUSE shall mean newspapers, magazines and flat- tened cartons tied securely in bundles by means of heavy twine, rope or wire, not exceeding seventy-five (75) pounds in weight per bundle nor forty-eight (48) inches in length; branches, cut- tings and brush similarly bundled and limited to forty-eight (48) inches in length and seventy-five (75) pounds in weight, and domestic items not suitable for containers, but weighing less than seventy-five (75) pounds and less than forty-eight (48) inches in length, to include bundled rugs and carpets, bicycles, toys, etc. COMMERCIAL, PROFESSIONAL, INDUSTRIAL AND APARTMENT COMPLEX ES- TABILSHMENTS, sometimes herein referred to as "RECIPIENT OF SER- VICE", "CUSTOMER", and "ESTABLISHMENT", shall be defined to mean: 1. Commercial Establishments shall mean any Establishment within the CITY limits licensed by the CITY, State, Federal Governments or their agencies; however, oil wells are not included in this definition. Trailer courts, motels, and hotels along with manufacturing establishments are included in this definition. 2. Professional Establishments shall mean any office or facility within the CITY limits occupied by a person or persons practicing a profession for which a license is issued by the CITY, State or Federal Government or agencies thereof. 3. Apartment Complex Establishment shall mean any grouping of ten (10) or more dwelling units upon a parcel of property, whether owned singly or severally. Where a parcel of property contains more than one (1) classifica- tion of establishments, each establishment shall be treated ac- cording to its own classification. APARTMENT HOUSE SERVICE shall mean collection of refuse from li- censed apartments containing at least three (3) but less than ten (10) dwelling units. DWELLING UNIT shall mean one (1) or more rooms designed for oc- cupancy by one (1) family for living or sleeping purposes: bachelor apartment shall be considered as a dwelling unit, however, maids quarters shall not. APARTMENT shall mean a room or a suite or two (2) or more rooms in a multiple dwelling, occupied or suitable for occupancy as a dwelling unit for one (1) family. UNIT - RESIDENTIAL SERVICE shall be deemed to equal to one (1) for each one (1) family dwelling and two (2) for each two (2) family dwelling (duplex) which has been initially occupied. UNIT - APARTMENT HOUSE SERVICE shall be deemed to equal one (1) for each apartment dwelling on any parcels of property containing more than three (3) but less than ten (10) such dwellings, (over ten (10) units are treated as commercial establishments). NOTICE shall be deemed given to the parties herein if mailed, certified or registered mail with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: 6 TO CONTRACTOR: Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. P.O. Box 2438 Gardena, California 90247 TO CITY: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH City Hall, Civic Center Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Attention City Manager TO PROPERTY OWNER: Record owner as indicated on the latest Tax Rolls. 11. Assignment of Agreement The Agreement entered into herein shall not be assignable without the consent of the CITY Council and shall be assignable only upon such terms and conditions as the CITY Council may require. Should the CONTRACTOR violate this provision of this Agreement, The CITY may terminate this Agreement upon giving the CONTRACTOR thirty (30) days written Notice as required in Section 10 hereof, but shall not be entitled to any damages for the viola- tion of this provision alone. The CITY's right to damages in the event of a default in any other provision of the Agreement by the CONTRACTOR shall not be limited by this provision. 12. Lawsuits CONTRACTOR shall defend the CITY and pay any judgement which may be obtained against the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers or employees either alone or jointly with said CONTRACTOR, his agents or employees, for injury or damage to persons or property by reason of the performance or non-performance of the terms of this Agreement; provided that if the CITY alone be sued for such injury or damage, notice in writing, as required in Section 10 hereof, shall be given to the CONTRACTOR to appear and defend such action. 13. Waivers No acquiescence, failure, or neglect of either of the contracting parties to insist on strict performance of any or all of the terms hereof shall be considered or constitute a waiver of any term or condition of this Agreement, or any performance required hereunder, or of any remedy, damages, or other right arising out of such refusal, neglect or inability to perform at any time. 14. Severability Should any part, clause, provision or condition of this Agreement be held to be void, invalid, or inoperative by any court of competent jurisdiction, then such invalidity shall not affect any other provisions hereof and the remaining provisions shall be effective as though such invalid part, clause, provision or con- dition had not been so made. 7 15. Miscellaneoous Matters A. As further consideration of this Agreement, CITY agrees to annually supply to CONTRACTOR a current register of all legal addresses on file. CONTRACTOR agrees to annually supply CITY with a computer run of all monthly billings, and, upon termination of this Agreement, a current computer run of all accounts on file. B. CITY agrees to cooperate reasonably with CONTRACTOR in the performance of its obligations pursuant to this Agreement, except that such cooperation shall not be to the extent that it will cost CITY any additional administrative ex- pense; and, further, CITY agrees to enact reasonable laws necessary to empower CITY to perform its obligations pur- suant to this Agreement. C. Within ten (10) days after the billing of any respective account during the term of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall furnish CITY a statement showing the total amount billed, total amount received on all accounts by CONTRACTOR, plus a statement certified to be correct by CONTRACTOR for the gross receipts for the previous month. Such certification may be made by any officer of the CONTRACTOR corporation, verifying that said figures are correct. On or before July 1 of each year during the term of this Agreement, CONTRAC- TOR shall cause an audit of his business to be made by a licensed public accountant or a certified public accountant and shall forthwith upon completion of such audit furnish to the CITY, without any expense or cost to the CITY, one of the following, to -wit: (at the option of CONTRACTOR, either of the following may be presented to the CITY). (i) A copy of said certified audit. (ii) A statement from the accountant preparing said audit setting forth the figures, as determined by said audit, relating to the following matters: total sums billed by CONTRACTOR on all accounts being billed as required by this Agreement, total sums collected thereunder, total amounts due and payable to CITY under this Agreement, and the balances due and payable from customers billed, and the balances, if any, due and payable to CITY. In the event such audit disclose that monies paid pursuant to this Agreement are less than monies obligated to be paid pursuant to this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall immediately pay the deficiency to CITY. CITY may, at its sole discretion, at any time, cause an audit of the business of CONTRACTOR to be made by a licensed public accountant, and if the statements of gross receipts or gross billings previously made to CITY shall be found to be less than the amount disclosed by said audit then CON- TRACTOR shall immediately pay additional monies required to be paid to CITY, and if said deficien- cy exceeds the sum of $200.00 per year, CONTRACTOR shall pay the cost of such audit; otherwise the cost of said audit shall be paid by CITY. This Agreement is made pursuant to and to be inter- preted according to the laws of the Stateof California and all parties agree to comply with with all ap- plicable provisions thereof. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and hold harmless CITY from any claims, suits, damages, liabilities or expen- ses resulting from the CONTRACTOR's discontinuing ser- vice at any location. Notwithstanding any other provisions, CONTRACTOR agrees that service to any location in the CITY may be termi- nated by the CONTRACTOR only with the express written permission of the CITY. CONTRACTOR and CITY agree to examine the concept of direct service by CONTRACTOR of all public refuse containers located throughout the city. Should this concept prove cost effective, CONTRACTOR agrees to provide direct servicing of public refuse containers with terms and conditions mutually agreed upon by CONTRACTOR and CITY. CONTRACTOR and CITY agree to examine the concept of a voluntary program to utilize alternate large capacity refuse receptacles for residential accounts. Terms and conditions of such a program to be mutually agreed upon by CONTRACTOR and CITY. CITY and CONTRACTOR agree to pursue the establishment of a recycling drop-off center. The recycling drop-off center would be manned by volunteer help and would not pay for materials received. Funds generated from the sale of recyclable materials would be utilized for a designated city project such as open space acquisition or park improvements. CITY agrees to pursue securing a suitable location for such a drop-off center and further agrees to provide the necessary site improvements required to operate such a center. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide the bins necessary to house the recyclable materials and agaree to haul materials to buy back centers at no cost to CITY. CONTRACTOR also agrees to advertise in appropriate news media to launch the program and agrees to work with local schools and service organizations to educate the citizanry regarding the program. CITY and CONTRACTOR agree to cooperate in the establishment of future recy- cling programs. J. CONTRACTOR agrees to implement a used motor oil collec- tion program. Said program would provide curbside pickup of used motor oil left in suitable, discardable continers. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide this service for period of 12 months at no cost to CITY. At the end of the 12 month period, a report indicating actual usage and costs will be provided by CONTRACTOR. Con- tinuation of the program beyond the 12 month period will be subject to terms and conditions mutually agreed upon by CONTRACTOR and CITY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said CITY has hereunto caused its corpo- rate name to be hereunto subscribed and its official seal to be hereunto affixed by its proper officers first thereunto duly au- thorized, and the said CONTRACTOR has hereunto set its hand and seal as of the day and year first hereinabove written. ATTEST: City Clerk (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney (SEAL) By: BY: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, a Municipal Corporation Mayor CONTRACTOR BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. EXHIBIT A RULES AND REGULATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE COLLECTION OF REFUSE All work done and services rendered shall be in accordance with the following specifications: 1. DEFINITIONS CITY is the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CONTRACTOR is the person, firm or corporation having a contract with the City of Hermosa Beach for the work mentioned in these specifications. REFUSE shall mean all waste from and incidental to the use of homes, residences, dwelling units, commercial or professional establishments, including but not limited to newspapers, maga- zines, wrappings, discarded clothing, empty packing cases, pack- ing materials such as paper, hay straw, shavings, excelsior, met- als, bottles, ashes, broken glass, garbage, garden and yard trim- mings, leaves and other household refuse. Not included in the definition of refuse are any dead animals, dirt or earth. Construction or industrial waste material such as plaster, lumber, bricks, tile or fixtures resulting from building construction, alterations or manufacturing processes shall not be considered household refuse when in excess of seventy-five (75) pounds in total weight and not contained in an approved refuse container. SPECIAL REFUSE shall mean furniture, appliances, television sets, water heater tanks, refrigerators, stoves, davenports, sinks, lawn furniture, doors, windows, screens, mattresses, beds, rugs and pads, which are incidental to family living and which exceed seventy-five (75) pounds in with and/or forty-eight (48) inches in length. MISCELLANEOUS REFUSE shall mean newspapers, magazines and flat- tened cartons tied securely in bundles by means of heavy twine, rope or wire, not exceeding seventy-five (75) pounds in weight per bundle nor forty-eight (48) inches in length; branches, cut- tings and brush similarly bundled and limited to forty-eight (48) inches in length and seventy-five (75) pounds in wei;ht; and domestic items not suitable for containers but weighing less than seventy-five (75) pounds and less than forty-eight (48) inches in length, to include bundled rugs and carpets, bicycles and toys. II. FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION All refuse shall be collected at frequences not less than those specified in these rules and regulations. The frequency of col- lection currently established is as follows: A. Refuse and Miscellaneous Refuse - At least once in each cal- endar week. B. Special Refuse - The CONTRACTOR shall collect all Special Refuse in conjunction with the regularly scheduled weekly refuse collection. The CONTRACTOR shall be responisble for collecting and disposing of all Christmas trees, regardless of size, within the CITY under payment provisions of the nor- mal residential and apartment house collection service. This is to include, but not be limited to, trees deposited in va- cant lots, city parks, and rights of way, in addition to those left with normally scheduled refuse collection. III. PERIOD OF COLLECTION All collection of refuse shall be made during the following hours: A. Residential - All collections must be made between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. B. Commercial - All collections must be made between the hours of 6:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M., except that collections on Pacific Coast Highway, Pier Avenue, and in the central busi- ness district (Beach Drive to Manhattan Avenue, from Tenth Street to Fifteenth Street) shall be made during other, or more, limited hours if required by the CITY Manager. IV. BIN SERVICE A. The CITY may, upon giving of notice thirty (30) days in ad- vance, require CONTRACTOR to remove bins from premises or public property for any cause, and may require immediate re- moval if CITY determines hazardous conditions exist. The CITY shall be the sole determinant of the necessity to have bins removed. B. The CONTRACTOR shall not discontinue service or remove any bin from an establishment without first receiving permission to do so from the CITY. C. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for proper maintenance of all bins belonging to it. This includes but is not limited to insuring operable, flush fitting lids, regular cleaning to prevent odors, and periodic painting to prevent rust or eliminate graffiti. In the event of a dispute, the CITY Man- ager or his designated representative will be the final judge if reasonable maintenance is needed on said bins. In any case, all bins shall be renovated at least once each year. - 12 - D. The CITY may review the location of bins at individual es- tablishments, and may require CONTRACTOR to place bins in another area or manner. V. PLACE OF DISPOSAL The CONTRACTOR, under this notice, must provide the removal and disposal of such refuse at a place and in a manner to be devised by the CONTRACTOR, but outside of the City of Hermosa Beach. CONTRACTOR must be prepared to prove to the satisfaction of the CITY Manager that he is in a position to provide such place of disposal for the period covered by this contract. VI. VEHICLES USED AND CARE REQUIRED A. All trucks, trailers and other conveyances or equipment used to collect refuse shall at all times be kept clean, in good repair, and well painted, to the satisfaction of the CITY Manager. The collector's name or firm name, together with his telephone number, shall be printed or painted in legible letters not less than three inches in height, on both sides of all trucks and conveyances used to collect refuse. B. Collection Vehicles - Type All refuse collection vehicles shall be of a load packing variety capable of accomodating refuse and special refuse with watertight bodies so that no material shall leak or be spilled from the vehicle on the streets or alleys of the City of Hermosa Beach. Collection vehicles shall be of a type able to negotiate improved alleys including those alleys which are ten feet or greater in width. C. Equipment Maintenance and Inspection CONTRACTOR shall make available for inspection by the CITY his collection vehicles after receiving a forty-eight (48) hour written notice of the same. The inspection will include mechanical, sanitary and aesthetic factors. Deficiencies will be required to be corrected. D. Smog Device Required To the extent required by law, each and every vehicle oper- ated by CONTRACTOR in the City of Hermosa Beach shall be equipped with a functioning and properly maintained smog con- trol device of a type certified by the State of California in the Health and Safety Code. E. CONTRACTOR'S Responsibility for Cleanliness of Operation Refuse vehicles shall not be stored within the boundaries of the CITY for more than two (2) hours without the specific permission of the CITY Manager having been previously ob- tained, unless prevented from moving by mechanical difficul- ties. Under no circumstances are collection vehicles to be regularly stored within the CITY limits. F. Personnel - Refrain from Use of Profanity CONTRACTOR's employees, in the performance of the duties herein called for, shall refrain from the use of profanity, loud talk or boisterous conduct which may annoy householders, and all work done pursuant to these specifications shall be carried on with the least possible disturbance or annoyance to residents of the CITY. G. Noise Level Each and every vehicle operated by CONTRACTOR in the City of Hermosa Beach shall comply with any and all laws and regula- tions of the State of California and the City of Hermosa Beach concerning permissible noise levels. VII. PLACING OF REFUSE The CONTRACTOR, under the provisions of these specifications herein contained, shall perform his services in accordance with the provisions of the applicable ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach pertaining to the collection and disposal of all refuse. All refuse to be collected must be placed on, near, or adjacent to the curb line of a street upon which the business establish- ment or residence abuts, and the CONTRACTOR herein shall not be required to enter any private buildings, dwellings or business establishments for the collection of refuse therefrom. CONTRAC- TOR shall carefully replace container to its proper place after emptying. The collector, his agents and employees shall not throw refuse containers from the truck to the pavement, or in any other way break or damage or roughly handle same. CONTRACTOR shall be charged for any unreasonable damage to containers, upon the determination of the CITY Manager or his designated representative. VIII. FAILURE OF CONTRACTOR TO COLLECT REFUSE Should the CONTRACTOR to whom the contract is let for the collec- tion for refuse fail to collect and remove any refuse which shall be properly set out and in proper containers at the time required of him, the City of Hermosa Beach may collect and dispose of the same, or cause it to be collected and disposed of, and may bill the CONTRACTOR for the expense of so doing, provided, however, that the CITY shall first make reasonable efforts to notify CON- TRACTOR by telephone or other informal means. IX. WEEKLY INQUIRY AS TO COMPLAINTS CONTRACTOR shall maintain a telephone, listed in the telephone directory in the firm name by which he is most commonly known and under the name "City of Hermosa Beach -Refuse Collection," and shall at all times during the hours between 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. each day except Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, have some person at said telephone for the answering of inquiries and by whom the complaints may be received from property owners and ten- ants of the City of Hermosa Beach. The telephone of said con- tractor shall be on exchanges of the areas served or a toll free number, and in no case shall the people of the areas served be required to pay a toll charge to telephone said CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain a written log of all such complaints, the date thereof, and the action taken pursuant thereto, or the reason for non -action. Such log of complaints shall be open to the inspection of the CITY Manager or his designated representa- tive at all reasonable times. CONTRACTOR shall, in person or by agent, report to or visit the office of the CITY Manager or his designated representative at least once each week for the purpose of receiving such orders, directions and complaints in regard to the performance of his contract as required. X. ROUTES AND CHANGES CONTRACTOR shall prepare and file with the CITY Manager a com- plete map of the refuse disposal district or districts within the City of Hermosa Beach. He shall indicate thereon in an appropri- ate and easily understandable manner and to the satisfaction and approval of the CITY Manager the days on which collections of refuse shall be made throughout the CITY, in residential and com- mercial areas repectively. However, CONTRACTOR shall endeavor to maintain existing collection scheduling. CONTRACTOR at his own expense shall publish in bold and legible type printing at least one time in a newspaper or newspapers of local circulation and/or by such other means as may be determined by the CITY Manager to be necessary the districts and streets and the days of the week on which refuse shall be collected, and shall furnish to the CITY an adequate supply of such schedule. Such published notice shall first be submitted to and approved by the CITY Manager of the City of Hermosa Beach. Similar notices shall be published upon the making of any subsequent changes in collection schedules. Thereafter, before any change in collection schedule is made by CONTRACTOR, he shall provide said CITY Manager with a new map as hereinabove described embodying such changes, and he shall also, at his own expense, notify the residents and establishments of the district of such new schedule ten (10) before change becomes effective, in the manner hereinabove described. Any other type of change affecting refuse collection service shall also be published and communicated to the public as re- quired in all paragraphs of this section. XI. NON -COLLECTION When any refuse is not collected by the CONTRACTOR, he shall leave a tag on which he has indicated the reason for his refusal to collect the refuse, giving reference to the CITY Ordinance or to the section of rules and regulations, or contract, which has been violated and which gives grounds for his refusal. This in- formation shall be either in writing or by means of a check sys- tem. The tag shall carry the CONTRACTOR's business or firm name and his telephone number, and shall be securely fastened to the container or the article refused. However, any container which does not conform to the standards established in the Hermosa Beach CITY CODE by reason of either original design or deterioration shall be serviced and so tagged. In the event that such containers are subsequently used to store refuse, CONTRACTOR shall do that which is necessary to collect and dispose of same. A record shall be kept of all places where it becomes necessary to tag and collect such containers. XII. HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTRACTOR shall provide a toll free telephone number which will dispense information regarding household hazardous waste includ- ing available disposal sites and existing disposal programs. This section shall not be interpreted as placing any respon- sibility on CONTRACTOR to accept or dispose of household hazard- ous waste. XIII. WORK TO BE DONE UNDER DIRECTION OF CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE All questions relating to the interpretation of the agreement and the duties of the CONTRACTOR hereunder shall be determined by the CITY Manager or his designated representative with the right of appeal to the CITY Council if anyone affected thereby is not satisfied with the decision, or to arbitration as provided in the refuse contract. CONTRACTOR shall take steps to assure CITY that a single individual will be assigned to act as liaison with the City of Hermosa Beach. AGREED and APPROVED this day of , 1989 BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA, INC. City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney EXHIBIT "B" Waste Systems. BROWNIMG.FERRIS INDUSTRIES Los Angeles District CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Schedule of Rates for trash Removal Service Commercial, Professional, Industrial Firms, and Apartment Complexes July, 1989 YARDS 1/WK 2/WK 3/WK 4/WK 5/WK 6/WK 7/WK 1 YD 42.46 63.74 84.98 106.25 127.32 148.71 174.00 1.5 YD 47.21 70.80 94.39 118.31 141.64 189.58 221.80 2 YD 56.68 87.39 118.05 148.71 174.72 200.70 234.81 3 YD 66.06 101.49 136.94 172.34 207.71 243.10 284.44 4 YD 79.27 121.81 183.89 207.08 249.29 291.78 341.38 6 YD 99.12 152.26 205.43 258.53 311.61 364.71 426.72 ROLL -OFF RATE $34.66 Delivery fee $148.50 per load plus disposal fee RESIDENTIAL RATE $8.02 per single family dwelling 14905 S. SAN PEDRO • P.O. BOX 2438 • GARDENA, CALIFORNIA 90247 • (213) 329-4115 INDUSTRIES On Angeles Dis!riot PROPOSED SHARE LOT USER RATES NAME ADDRESS CURRENT PROPOSED RATE RATE Bamboo Hut 36 Pier Ave 62.51 69.30 Bank of America 90 Pier Ave 74.44 82.53 Coast Drugs 58 Pier Ave 32.92 36.50 Diarlas 4 Pier Ave 70.71 78.40 End Zone 22 Pier Ave 104.38 115.73 Hennessy's 8 Pier Ave 29.93 33.18 Hermosa Fish 20 Pier Ave 45.24 50.16 Hermosa Hotel 26 Pier Ave 68.90 76.39 Lighthouse 30 Pier Ave 100.90 111.87 Pier Market 50 Pier Ave 60.90 67.52 Pier 52 52 Pier Ave 99.79 110.64 Robert's 74 Pier Ave 35.48 39.34 Shirt Tales 34 Pier Ave 10.98 12.17 Sushi Sei 50 Pier Ave 105.36 116.81 Polar Bear 68 Pier Ave 98.76 109.50 Avanti Jewlers 31 Pier Ave 12.47 13.83 Beach Store 59 Pier Ave 26.20 29.05 Cantina Real 19 Pier Ave 65.48 72.60 Casa Bianca 53 Pier Ave 80.36 89.10 Citicorp 81 Pier Ave 37.51 41.59 Hermosa Cycle 53 Pier Ave 13.50 14.97 14905 S. SAN PEDRO • P.O. BOX 2438 • GARDENA, CALIFORNIA 90247 • (213) 329.4115 Page 2 Hermosa Tackle 21 Pier Ave 9.35 10.37 11 Boccaccio 39 Pier Ave 102.13 113.23 Jeannes 73 Pier Ave 25.32 28.07 Lovy & Davy 49 Pier Ave 13.20 14.63 Mermaid 11 Pier Ave 123.51 136.94 Paradise Sushi 53 Pier Ave 39.05 43.29 Pier Surf 25 Pier Ave 7.49 8.30 Shear Art 49 Pier Ave 13.62 15.10 Sugar Babies 53 Pier Ave 13.50 14.97 Pacific Screen 65 Pier Ave 27.94 30.98 Bey Company 1233 Hermosa 12.65 14.03 Bijou Cinema 1233 Hermosa 85.54 94.84 Easy Reader 1233 Hermosa 37.57 41.65 Michael J. Video 1233 Hermosa 4.08 4.52 Harbor Blues 1235 Hermosa 16.90 18.74 Hermosa Cycle 20 13th St 22.39 24.82 West Bay Apts 30 13th St 42.02 46.59 La Playita 16 14th St 93.23 103.36 Good Stuff 1286 Strand 77.97 86.45 Jeffers 1338 Strand 3.90 4.32 Pacific Strand 1328 Strand 13.09 14.51 Perrys 1318 Strand 66.88 74.15 Poop Deck 1272 Strand70.22 77.85 "- .. t. vies ,c_ui', 'R 1a1 Page 3 NAME ADDRESS CURRENT PROPOSED RATE RATE Goodies Galore 1332 Strand Not billed 43.30 Teri Teri Inn 1312 Strand Currently 32.80 Lappers Aloha Ice Cream 29 Pier Ave it 41.00 C & S Fashions 37 Pier Ave g+ 12.74 $5 Store 49 Pier Ave it 15.29 Restyle Too 1227 Hermosa Ave N 16.63 A.V. Designs 1233 Hermosa Ave to 16.17 Starlette Collectables 1233 Hermosa Ave It 16.17 David J. Olin Assoc 1233 Hermosa Ave I► 16.17 P.4/5 BACKOROUND MAT.ERIALS Waste Systems - BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES Los Angeles District May 31, 1989 William Grove Director, Building & Safety CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear Bill: Thank you for taking the time to work with us in pursuing a contract extension for refuse services with Hermosa Beach. With the exception of those new items which may be included or excluded by the City after review, the basic language of the contract is acceptable to us. We feel that the contract has been a fair and equitable one for both BFI and the City of Hermosa Beach. BFI appreciated being chosen as the City of Hermosa Beach hauler previously, and has been pleased to offer the City rates which are among the lowest in the South Bay, while giving the City the highest levels of service available. In an effort reviewed the to explore, basis. to maintain quality in both areas, BFI has carefully additional items that the City Council instructed you and those have been delineated on an item by item As you move through the various points, you will find BFI is working to improve the present quality of service offered to residents and businesses. Some of the projects will take time to fully develop, but the end result will be a continued quality refuse removal system for the City. Additionally, BFI proposes to guarantee disposal capacity for the City of Hermosa Beach during the terms of the contract. As stated 14905 S. SAN PEDRO • P.O. BOX 2438 • GARDENA, CALIFORNIA 90247 • (213) 329-4115 Letter to Mr. Grove Page 2 May 31, 1989 previously, while present capacity exists in the disposal system for the greater Los Angeles County area, disposal capacity could become a significant item during next five years. Finally, the audit required by Section 15C is in progress, and will be completed shortly. I look forward to continuing to work with you and the City of Hermosa Beach. Best regards, Ronald V. Pfeifer Vice President Attachments RVP:ff 1. Inclusion Of Refuse Pickup At City Facilities At No Cost To The City, While many current City contracts state City services are provided for free, the fact is that the cost of these services is actually subsidized by an additional charge borne by residents and businesses. Hermosa Beach now averages $4,275.00 per month for all City services. A review of the services provided indicates little improvement potential for economic gains. In effect, to create a no cost situation for the City would require a residential unit increase of $.34 per unit plus an average of 4% additional cost to the business sector at today's dollars. We do note that a portion of the City cost is for Sunday services to the share lots. This is averaging $465.98 per month and the City may consider transferring this portion of expense to the business community. 2. Replacement of Once Monthly Larae Item Pickup Is Part Of The Weekly Service BFI proposes to collect all bulk items on a weekly basis on the same day the regular trash is picked up, rather than on one Saturday per month. BFI feels that this will benefit the residents and the community. Such an arrangement will no longer require residents to call the City for a pickup. The City will not have to arrange and control a pickup listing. In addition, refuse vehicles will not be required to be in residential areas of the City on Saturday. When costs are analyzed, there is no added cost to the City for this service (the difference calculates out to less than 1/2 cent per home per month). 3. Possible Pickup Of Public Refuse Containers Located Throughout The City In order to service the City containers, we would need a two- man rear -loader. This rear -loader would service the 200 + City cans throughout the City. Approximately $1,300.00 of this amount should be offset by disposal savings to the City, since it will no longer be disposing of the refuse from the cans into roll -off boxes at the City yard. Concerning the cans on the strand, we would equip the rear - loader with dollies, so the cans could be rolled out to the nearest side street. North of 22nd Street, we would utilize a scout truck to collect the City cans on the strand. The cost of this service would be $6,625.00 per month. 4. Provision Of A Household Hazardous Waste Hotline To Provide Information Regarding Appropriate Sources For Household Hazardous Waste Disposal An 800 telephone number system for this purpose is being installed at BFI - Gardena. Also, we are installing a 24-hour answering system on our regular number to allow us to handle any community service emergency which may arise. These systems are being installed to service our entire customer base, and will be a no cost item for the City of Hermosa Beach. Both systems are expected to be operational by the end of August, 1989. 5. Use Of Alternate Large Capacity Refuse Receptacles For Residential Accounts There are two systems available, automated and semiautomated. Due to street and pick-up area constraints in the City of Hermosa Beach, only the semiautomated system is feasible. We have investigated this option, as it applies to Hermosa Beach. With a contracted curbside pickup system already in place, we should probably opt to sell you on the service. Past experience has shown that this semiautomated system reduced worker injuries, improved routing efficiency, was more sanitary and aesthetically pleasing. However, we do not feel the system is particularly well suited to the topography (and the related problems of the topography) of the Hermosa Beach area. Most of the brochures picture the cart on a neatly manicured, curbed lot line in either flat or gently rolling suburban landscapes. We do not feel that the cart system is a particularly practical program in an area which does not conform to that scenario. Indeed, in Hermosa Beach many residents find it difficult to locate a space large enough to place a standard trash can. In many instances, residents would be unable to fit the cart thru gates or walkways. The cart is on wheels, and residents required to move it up and down steps along walkways may find this to be a hazard, rather than a help. An additional factor to be considered is the cost -- average cost per cart is $55.00 to $60.00. Various options of purchase and/or lease programs are available, but whatever option is taken, the estimated cost per month per household would range from $1.25 to $1.50 for the first five years of the program. If the City would want to pursue further study on this matter, an area potentially adaptable to the system would be "the flats." This area is roughly bounded by Gould and Pier avenues between Valley and Hermosa, and contains approximately 900 homes. We would need to pursue discussions with cart manufacturers to establish exact costs for a test program. 6. Recycling. Including Drop-off Center Or Curbside Program It appears imminent that no singular solution will resolve our "garbage crisis." Rather an integrated approach of recycling landfilling, incineration, composting, etc., will be needed to handle our refuse. Over the past several years, much has been written and tested with respect to recycling. It is not a "passing fad," but rather, will become an integrated part of the disposal programs of the future. Communities have come to realize, however, that recycling systems, curbside or drop-off, have costs associated with them which are not recovered by sale of the material and/or landfill avoidance costs. Typically, a substantial commitment of time and capital are required to begin, and maintain a viable curbside program. This program, however, generates more usage by residents since it is more convenient. Less costly, but requiring more effort by the citizenry, is a drop-off center. While I feel that the long term approach for the City of Hermosa Beach will be a combination of drop-off center and curbside collection, I am recommending a conservative start up approach for the City. I recommend initially, a drop-off center. Since Hermosa Beach is only 1.3 square miles in area, citizens efforts to support the site would be minimal. This program would give the City of Hermosa Beach the ability to start up a recycling program with little risk. I would allow time for the City to assess the results of the survey presently being conducted, implement promotional activities revolving around the concept of recycling and the benefits involved, and further evaluate the citizen responses and desire for such programs. A variety of options as to the type of drop-off operation are available. An example of one option would be for the City to provide a secured area (perhaps the most difficult part of the plan given the problems of space in the City) in which bins to deposit the materials could be placed. The site could be operated by either the City (if the site chosen was at the City yard) or by volunteer groups (if the site chosen was at a separate location. In either case, drop-off material would not Revenues from the operation would be used specific City project (park enhancement, tot would support the volunteer group's programs. be purchased. to support a lot, etc.) or BFI would be willing to support the program by providing all bins necessary and hauling materials to buy back centers at no charge. We also would provide for daily pick up of all nonrecyclable items inadvertently brought to the site by citizens. In addition, BFI would be willing to advertise in appropriate news media to launch the program. We also will work with local schools, Rotary, Kiwanis, etc. to educate and gain participation in the program. I have attached several brochures of potential advertising material , as well as pictures of recycle drop-off centers for your review. Regardless of the options chosen by the City, should you chose to accept the drop-off center program, BFI is committed to maintain the "good citizen" reputation we have established in Hermosa Beach by participating in the program. Waste Oil Pickup/Recycling BFI will implement a used motor oil pickup program. This program could be implemented at the same time as the drop-off recycle operation or at an earlier date if requested. Present programs use discarded milk containers with caps on to place oil by the curb. The oil is then placed in a holding tank on the truck and dumped into our larger storage tank at Gardena. The oil is collected in bulk from that tank by a recycler. For the first 12 -months BFI offers to provide this service at no charge to the residents of Hermosa Beach. This will allow us to gather data to determine actual costs involved in the project. At the end of that period, we would present you with our results, and discuss continuation elements for the program. Waste motor oil represents a significant portion of the hazardous waste generated by many communities. Removal of this oil through your trash service represents a very efficient method of disposal of a very real environmental problem. 7. Use Of Eauipment Of A Size To Be Able To Negotiate Narrow Alleys Allowing For Alley Refuse Pickup We have reviewed the streets in question. We are preparing to replace one of our present side-load trucks with a rear- load vehicle. This will provide more efficient service in those few areas presently inconvenienced. It is anticipated that the rear-load vehicle will have a turning radius which will enable us to service those small number of residences which are located on particularly narrow alleys. This will eliminate the need for any residents to carry their trash to another pickup location. There is no increase in cost to the City of Hermosa Beach for this upgrade. yrs • YY yr a4.vv yot fa.* ..YY 8. Refuse Rate Adjustment Request The present contract with the City of Hermosa Beach states that an annual adjustment in rates based on changes reflected in the consumer price index shall be granted, not to exceed 10% annually, each July 1. The CPI to be used is the Los Angeles area, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics for Transporation Groups. This language also is to be utilized to determine adjustments in any extensions of the contract. The change in CPI from April of 1988 to April of 1989 is 8%. BFI respectfully requests a basic rate adjustment of 8% based on that data with the contract extension. In addition, BFI also seeks an adjustment based on landfill increases since July 1, 1988. In January, 1989, both landfill and transfer station rates increased due to a $.55 surcharge assessed by the State of California. BFI opted at that time to absorb the increase until the entire Hermosa Beach system could be reviewed for potential operational changes, since discussions of various operational concepts were in process. Unfortunately, we have now been notified that landfill and transfer station rates will escalate once more. Effective July 1, 1989, the new rates will be $11.60/ton at Puente (up $2.10 from 7/1/88) and South Gate transfer rates will increase from $20.00 to $23.10/ton on July 1 (up $3.10 from July 1, 1988). A breakdown of the effect of these increases is attached. We find ourselves unable to overcome these increases, and find it necessary to request an adjustment in rates to offset these new fees. As you can see, the impact on disposal costs indicates a need for an additional 2.87% increase over and above the CPI adjustment. The total increase needed for escalating costs is 10.87%, including adjustments to maintain the franchise fee at 10%. v. . u. 1 . i. ',Orli\Lr•LI Irl lr J. Residential 1. A. Avg. Monthly Gross Rev. 3. Avg. Monthly Disposal C. Net Revenue 2. Current Monthly Disposal Cost 22 % Disposal Increase $47,500.00 $38,600.70 Increase Monthly Disposal Cost 3. Total Current Gross Revenue Disposal Increase Proposed Gross Revenue Commercial Total $55,500.80 $12,300.30 $43,200.50 4. Proposed Gross Revenue with Disposal Increase New Monthly Disposal Cost Proposed Net Revenue $103,080.00 <$21,160.00> $81,920.00 $21,160.00 X 1.22 $25,815.20 $4,655.20 $103,080.00 4,655.20 $107,735.20 $107,735.20 25,815.20 $81,920.00 5. Proposed Gross Revenue $107.735.20 Divided by Current Gross Revenue $103,080.00 1.0442 JUN 21 '89 14:17 B.F.I. GARDENA *121 P.4/6 1. Present Gross Revenue (less disposal) CPI Los Angeles/Long Beach Adjustment Total Proposed Gross Revenue (less disposal) 2. Total Proposed Gross Revenue (less disposal) Present Gross Revenue Additional Revenue (CPI Adjustment) 3. Present Gross Revenue (less disposal) Proposed Disposal Increase Increase Related to CPI Adjustment Disposal Costs (current) 4. Proposed Gross Revenue Total Current Revenue Total Increase $81,920.00 X 1.08 $88,473.60 $88,473.60 81,920.00 $6,553.60 $81,920.00 4,655.20 6,553.60 21 160.00 $114,288.80 $114,288.80 103,010_,K $11,208.80 10.87% Con.yrter 'rice iris% for All 0:''.71'1 Cor. .filer : Indexes .ini percent chanseti for selected erlcr1!.-Cmtinl^rl ' Cr•!.;r-'•r Price Inde% for Al; :'''t.itn Conzia r..: Irclexes and percent changes for se]. -ted perlodt,-,:cntinged rr:hrilt f•:• Price ;ril'+x for Al: Urban Consumers: Indexes and percent changes for tic:ccted periodti-Ctmtirued Ar :es-Ar>~].t-:elm-RI erside, CA (1982-04=1C4, unless otherwise noted) Published indexes Percent charge to Apr. 1989 from - Feb. Mar. Apr. Apr. Feb. 1989 1969 1989 1988 1989 Mar. 1989 Evr_nditure category Expenditure category Expenditure category :r&' portat1on 116.0 117.5 121.9 8.0 5.1 3.7 Private transportation 114.4 116.0 120.9 8.0 5.7 4.2 Motor fuel 75.9 81.5 99.0 23.1 30.4 21.5 Gasoline 75.4 81.0 98.6 23.1 30.8 21.7 Gasoline, leaded regular 75.3 81.0 99.2 24.2 31.7 22.5 Gasoline, unleaded regular 73.4 79.4 97.7 24.5 33.1 23.0 Gasoline, unleaded premium 80.0 84.0 90.0 18.1 22.5 16.7 Public transportation 143.1 143.4 143.6 7.6 .3 .1 Medical care 145.2 146.1 147.4 7.3 1.5 .9 Entertainment 118.7 110.5 119.8 4.3 .9 1.1 Other go:clu and services 152.9 152.6 152.9 10.6 .0 .2 Perrrn a3 care 136.9 135.8 135.5 10.6 -.3 -.2. Commndlty and nervice group Coomollty and servlce group Cnmmriity and service group A]1 items 1;5.5 126.2 127.2 5.0 1.4 .8 C mmoditien 113.9 115.5 117.7 6.4 1.3 1.9 Food ani beverages 122.2 122.8 123.6 6.6 1.1 .7 Ccrr d i t i es lest; food and beveragen 108.5 110.0 111.A 6.4 4.9 2.7 Nonlurablen less food and beverages 108.3 112.9 110.4 11.3 9.3 4.9 Dnrablen 108.6 107.4 107.0 -.6 -1.5 -.4 Service 135.9 135.9 135.9 4.1 .0 .0 Medical cslre services 146.5 147.0 140.2 7.5 1.2 .8 Special indexes Special indexes Speclal indexes Al; items less shelter 121.3 122.4 124.0 5.8 2.2 1.3 All Items less medical care 124.3 125.0 " 125.0 4.9 1.4 .8 All items lens energy 129.4 129.9 330.1 4.4 .5 .2 En'r3Y 89.0 92.3 103.0 16.3 15.7 11.6 Coesnditien less food 109.5 111.5 114.4 6.1 4.5 2.6 Noniurab]en less food 109.7 113.8 110.0 10.4 8.3 4.4 N6rjurablen 115.6 118.2 121.2 8.6 4.8 2.5 !ervices lens rent of shelter 1/ 140.5' 140.5 141.2 4.8 .5 .5 S' r."1rrrare _ 114.9 134.0 114.8 3.9 -.1 .0 3, Help that old bag lose some weight. It's time to put those trash bags on a weight program. How? By recycling, of course. Just a few minutes sorting out the newspaper, plastic 2 -liter bottles and milk containers, aluminum cans and glass can make a lot of difference when it's time to haul that bag out for pickup. Join the BFI RecycleNOW' program in your neighborhood, and help that old garbage bag lose some weight. End the battle of the bulge. 1 Is your trash can losing the battle of the bulge? The daily fight to jam every- thing in? Even newspapers, plastic 2 -liter bottles and milk containers, aluminum and glass? Well now there is a way to help win the war. Start recycling now! By removing these items from your trash, you're helping preserve natural resources and save valuable landfill space. You will also help your trash can win the battle of the bulge. A Neighborhood Recycling Program CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RECYCLING FEASIBILITY SURVEY RESULTS No. received daily: Total to date: 5/8/89 1 1 5/9 325 326 5/10 308 634 5/11 400 1034 5/15 534 1568 5/16 147 1715 5/17 259 1974 5/18 177 2151 5/22 292 2443 5/23 28 2471 5/24 86 2557 5/25 49 2606 5/26 37 2643 5/27 66 2709 5/30 13 2722 5/31 24 2752 6/4 41 2793 6/5 13 2806 6/6 19 2825 1. Do you believe a Hermosa Beach Recycling program would help solve disposal and environmental problems in the area? Yes 2202 No 623 2. Do you currently recycle? Yes 1459 No 1074 Occasionally 107 Newspapers 645 Bottles 329 Cans 1133 Plastics 265 Other 72 3. Would you separate newspapers, cans, bottles and recycle if: a. it was picked up in front of your home with regular refuse? Yes 1963 No 241 b. you were paid for material in a neighborhood center? Yes 1264 No 836 4. Would you be willing to support city-wide recycling efforts by inclusion of a surcharge on your refuse bill? Yes 1186 No 974 COMMENTS / SUGGESTIONS OFFERED - Program should be able to pay for itself. 995 Possibly only 5/0 of current refuse charge. 178 How are renters to be billed? 324 Landlords shouldn't pay for tenants. 279 Bill only those who participate. 252 Encourage independent collectors. 356 Include hazardous waste at recycling centers. 266 Containers should be provided. 189 Glass and styrofoam should not be sold at beach. 185 Many residents have no room for the containers. 40 Containers will clutter sidewalks/alleys. 27 Valley School has recycling every two months. 7 CONCLUSIONS: 1. A significant majority believe recycling would help disposal and environmental problems. 2. A majority currently recycle using available resources. 3. More would participate in a curbside program than would participate in a neighborhood center. 4. There is not strong support for an additional surcharge to support recycling efforts. A significant number of respondents believe recycling proceeds should cover the cost of the program which is incorrect. 5. Even though a majority say they would separate the materials if they were paid, comments offered tell us that convenience rather than payment is the overall concern. 6. Within the comments offered regarding renters, a sizable number of respondents suggest tenants, not landlords, be billed and there are questions about how this would be accomplished. 44k - CITY REFUSE COLLECTION SURVEY (JUNE 1989) Large 3 yd. Monthly P/U Item Comm. bin- Fee/Unit Weekly P/U Franchise 1/Week Redondo Beach 8.10 1 Weekly no Gardena 6.35 1 1/year no ONO MS IMO Carson 10.50 2 1/month no MOD Torrance 9.75 1 1/year no .11 1M IMP Lawndale 9.35 2 weekly no •M IMP Manhattan Beach SFR 8.27 1 Dupl 15.68 Trip 18.02 weekly yes 60.37 Hawthorne 9.05 1 2/year yes 92.90 Hermosa Beach 7.23 1 1/month yes 59.58 PROPOSED: 8.02 1 weekly yes 66.06 * The rates for other cities do not reflect increases scheduled for next fiscal year as they have yet to be determined. • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY SCHEDULE OF NEW RATES FOR SOLID WASTE TRANSFER AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1989 SPADRA LANDFILL, Pomona EFFECTIVE* JULY 1. 1989 Municipal Solid and Inert Waste $11.60/ton Hard -to -Handle Bulky Items 17.10/ton Tires and Special Handling 30.10/ton Minimum Charge 11.50 per load Pull -Offs 16.50 each PUENTE HILLS LANDFILL, Whittier Municipal Solid and Inert Waste Hard -to -Handle Bulky Items Tires and Special Handling Minimum Charge Pull -Offs $11.60/ton 17.10/ton 30.10/ton 11.50 per load 16.50 each SOUTH GATE TRANSFER STATION, South Gate Municipal Solid and Inert Waste $23.10/ton Hard -to -Handle Bulky Items 28.60/ton Minimum Charge 12.00 per load SCHOLL CANYON LANDFILL, Glendale Municipal Solid and Inert Waste $16.60/ton Hard -to -Handle Bulky Items 22.10/ton Tires and Special Handling 30.10/ton Minimum Charge 16.50 per load Pull -Offs 21.50 each CALABASAS LANDFILL, Agoura Municipal Solid and Inert Waste $16.60/ton Hard -to -Handle Bulky Items 22.10/ton Tires and Special Handling 30.10/ton Minimum Charge 16.50 per load Pull -Offs 21.50 each Uncovered Loads Capable of Producing Litter - All Sites - $3.00/ton surcharge; $3.00 minimum *ALL RATES REFLECT A STATE FEE IMPOSED ON ALL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES IN CALIFORNIA. RATES ARE SUBJECT TO ADJUSTMENT ON JANUARY 1 OF EACH YEAR TO REFLECT ANY CHANGE IN THE AMOUNT OF THIS FEE. R ' H COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY SCHEDULE OF NEW RATES FOR SOLID WASTE TRANSFER AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1989 SPADRA LANDFILL, Pomona Refuse Solid Inert Material Hard -to -Handle Bulky Items Minimum Charge Pull -Offs Tires and Special Handling PUENTE HILLS LANDFILL, Whittier Refuse Solid Inert Material Hard -to -Handle Bulky Items Minimum Charge Pull -Offs Tires and Special Handling SOUTH GATE TRANSFER STATION, South Gate Refuse Hard -to -Handle Bulky Items Minimum Charge Tires and Special Handling SCHOLL CANYON LANDFILL, Glendale Refuse Solid Inert Material Hard -to -Handle Bulky Items Minimum Charge Pull -Offs Tires and Special Handling CALABASAS LANDFILL, Agoura Refuse Solid Inert Material Hard -to -Handle Bulky Items Minimum Charge Pull -Offs Tires and Special Handling EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1989 $10.10/ton 10.10/ton 15.10/ton 10.00 per load 15.00 each 30.10/ton $10.10/ton 10.10/ton 15.10/ton 10.00 per load 15.00 each 30.10/ton $21.10/ton 26.10/ton 11.50 per load 30.10/ton $14.10/ton 14.10/ton 19.10/ton 14.00 per load 19.00 each 30.10/ton $15.10/ton 15.10/ton 20.10/ton 15.00 per load 20.00 each 30.10/ton Uncovered Loads Capable of Producing Litter - All Sites - $3.00/ton surcharge; $3.00 minimum June 20, 1989 City Council.Meeting' June .27,' 1989 • SELECTION OF COUNCIL SPONSORED BALLOT MEASURES FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 7, 1989 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council decide on what Council sponsored ballot initiatives they wish to place on the ballot for the General Municipal Election to be held on November 7, 1989, and .direct the City Attorney to prepare the wording to be presented at the next meeting. The following have previously been suggested as possible' ballot measures for November: A. Unleashed dogs on railroad right-of-way. B. Biltmore Site- Task Force/Planning Commission recommendation. Background In addition to any measures the Council may sponser, there is a People's Initiative regarding Open Space/Park on the Biltmore Site that has already qualified; and signatures are being checked on another People's Initiative regarding present uses and unleashed dogs on the railroad right-of-way. Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk Concur: 12a SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Greenbelt Leash Law Inifative Section 1. In recognition of the recent purchase by the people of Hermosa Beach of the Santa Fe/ Herat Greenbelt for parkland and open space purposes, and in further recognition that this Greenbelt is intended to serve as a recreational and aesthetic oasis for all the people of Hermosa Beach to enjoy without fear, harm or trepidation, and further, acknowledging the desire and intent of the people of Hermosa Beach for fairness and equity in the enforcement of all laws which preserve the rights of the people to enjmy public open space lands equally and fully, NOWJ Therefore the people of Hermosa Beach do respectfully request the following: All mxixtixgx current leash laws that currently pertain to all existing public parks, walkways and openspace areas shall now also be applied to the -entire Santa e/ Hermosa Greenbelt area. THOMAS W STOEVER WILLIAM S. RIACM CHARLES S. VOSE ROGER w. SPRINGER CONNIE COOKS SANDIFER COWARD W LEE HCRiSCRT0 DIAZ JAMES OUFF MURPHY LAW OFFICES OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & EINBODEN A PROFE55a0NAL CORPORATION 1000 SUNSET POULEVAQD LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 (E,31 a50-3043 MEMORANDUM June 21, 1989 TELECOpIER (d13) 462-5330 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council of Hermosa Beach FROM: Charles S. Vose, Interim City Attorney RE: cstions Re ardin Railroad Right -Of -Way Initiative This memoranda is submitted in response to certain questions voiced by the City Council at the last meeting. If the Councilmcmbers have further questions concerning this initiative, please contact me prior to the Tuesday evening meeting. 1. What authority does the City Council have to change the title of this initiative ordinance? None. Government Code Section 4010 states that when an initiative is signed by the required amount of votes, and contains a request that the ordinance be submitted immediately to a vote of the people, the legislative body shall: (a) Introduce the ordinance without alteration at the regular meeting at which it is presented and adopt the ordinance within 10 days after it is presented; or (b) Immediately order a special election, to beheld not less than 88 nor more than 103 days after the date of the order, at which the ordinance, without alteration, shall be submitted to a vote of the voters of the city. (c) Order a report pursuant to Section 4009.5 at the regular meeting at which the ordinance is presented. When the report is presented to the legislative body, the legislative body shall either adopt the ordinance within 10 days or order an election pursuant to subdivision (b). 1. OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & EINEIODEN Election Code 4010 makes clear that whatever alternative the governing body chooses to take, the ordinance is to remain "without alteration." Further, the action authorized under Eleotion Code 4010, is procedural in nature, merely affording the governing body an opportunity to adopt the ordinance, saving an election (See, 19 Ops. Atty. Gen. 94, 96). 2. Can the City Council adopt the ordinance and then place a limited measure on the ballot solely on the issue of "unleashed dogs"? Yes. The City Council may introduce the ordinance at the regular meeting, then adopt the ordinance within 10 days after it is presented [See, Election Code Section 4010(a)]. The governing body may amend or repeal an initiative statute by another statute that becomes effective only when approved by the electors unless the initiative statute permits amendment or repeal without their approval [Cal Const., Art. II, Sec. 10(c)]. Section 5 of the proposed initiative states: "There shall be no modification, amendment or repeal of any provisions of this initiative except by a vote of the people." Election Code Section 4017 authorizes the City Council to submit to the voters, without a petition, a proposition for the repeal, amendment, or enactment of any ordinance, to be voted upon at any succeeding regular or special city election. If the proposition receives a majority vote cast on it at the election, the ordinance shall be repealed or amended. A proposition pursuant to Election Code Section 4017 may be submitted, or a special election may be called for the purpose of voting on a proposition, by ordinance or resolution. Election Code Sections 22835 et seq. provides for the notice of election requirements when the governing body submits a proposition. 3. What procedures exist to withdraw a signature upon the initiative, and what if fraud or misrepresentation exists in the collection of signatures? Any voter who has signed an initiative petition and subsequently wishes their name withdrawn, may do so by filing a written request for the withdrawal, with the city clerk, prior to the date the petition is filed (Election Code Section 5352). There exists criminal penalties for filing and circulating petitions in a fraudulent manner. Election Code Sections 39730 et seq. provide both misdemeanor and felony penalties for falsifying signatures on petitions (See, attachments). There are also penalties for aiding and abetting fraudulent circulation of petitions by governmental officials. 2. — �_� L 1 t F-: 1 4_1 t t in: .= t. I f-' - k:.l -. OLIVER, STOEVER, eARR & EINBODEN Injunctions and mandamus have been used to exclude from elections ballot measures which would be invalid if enacted. Because courts are not required, nor inclined, to interfere with the initiative process, before a declaring an initiative invalid before an election, it must be clear beyond question that the initiative is invalid. 4. Can the City Clerk accept signatures on an initiative petiition without random sampling? No. Election Code Section 3520, provides for random sampling of signatures if more than 500 names have been signed on a petition. There is no exception given, even if the petition does not contain more than 500 names. Respectfully submitted, OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & EINBODEN By . Charles S. Vose Interim City Attorney CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3. INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE VOTERS The City Attorney has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING FURTHER DEVELOPMENT ON THE SANTA FE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, RESTRICTING USE OF THE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS, AND ALLOWING FOR UNLEASHED DOGS TO BE TRAINED AND/OR EXERCISED. This proposed initiative ordinance would place certain use controls on the property known as the Santa Fe Railroad Right-of-Way/Greenbelt within the boundaries of the City of Hermosa Beach. The stated purpose of the ordinance is to preserve the Right -of -Way for "passive open space uses." In determining future usages, the current ten percent lot coverage allowed under the Open Space zone will not apply to the Right -of -Way. Normally, lot coverage percentages limit how much area buildings may occupy in relation to the overall size of the parcel. However, this proposed initiative intends to prevent structures and buildings "of any nature" on the Right -of - Way which would interfere with present uses. The measure also prevents roads and paved parking that would interfere with the present uses of natural parkland, walk- ing and jogging. Provision is made to keep sixty-one paved parking spaces currently in existence on the Right -of -Way. These spaces are across Valley Drive from Clark Stadium. An additional mandate of the measure is that dogs would be allowed on the Right -of -Way for exercise and/or training. The dogs, however, must be kept under the competent control of their owners or the owners' designees. This would change ex- isting law which prevents dogs from being off -leash on public property. The current leash law is not being enforced by deci- sion of the City Council. If any part of this measure is invalidated, the rest will remain in full force and effect. Once adopted, this ordinance can on- ly be amended or repealed by a vote of the people. . ..I • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PRESERVING TO PERPETUITY THE PRESENT, TRADI- TIONAL AND HISTORICAL CONDITION AND USAGE OF THE SANTA FE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY/GREENBELT. WHEREAS, the citizens of Hermosa Beach find and declare that the property commonly known as the Santa Fe Railroad Right-of-Way/Greenbelt is not suitable for development of paved parking, structures, buildings and/or, roads, including the ten percent permitted under open space definition, WHEREAS, the historic usage for at least twenty five years has been for natural parkland, walking, jogging, and as a leash optional exercise and/or training area for dogs under the competent control of owner/designee, NOW THEREFORE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the property known as the Santa Fe Railroad Right-of-Way/Greenbelt shall be preserved to perpetuity for passive open space uses only. Section 2. That the ten percent development permitted in the open space designation shall not be applicable to Santa Fe Railroad Right-of-Way/Greenbelt. Section 3. That the Santa Fe Railroad Right of Way/Greenbelt shall never have roads, structures, buildings of any nature or paved parking other than the 61 existing parking stalls across from Clark Stadium, which could in any way interfere with the present uses, namely natural parkland, walking, jogging, and a leash optional exercise and/or training area for dogs under competent control of owner/designee. Section 4. In the event that any provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unenforceable, the same shall not af- fect in any respect whatsoever the validity or enforceability of the remainder of this ordinance. Section 5. There shall be no modification, amendment or repeal of any provisions of this initiative except byavoteof the people. NOTICE OF INTENT TO CIRCULATE PETITION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the persons whose names appear hereon of their intention to circulate an in- itiative petition within the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California. A statement of the reasons of the proposed action as contemplated in the petition is as follows: 1. Instituting an ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, preserving to perpetuity the historic, tradi- tional and present usage and condition of the property commonly known as Santa Fe Railroad Right-of- Way/Greenbelt. 2. Eliminating the 10% development option under open space definition. 3. The people of the City of Hermosa Beach find and declare that the historic, traditional and present uses of this property are that of an unimpeded area for joggers, walkers, as a leash optional exercise and/or training area for dogs under the competent control of owner/designee, and as a natural parkland. 4. There shall be no modification, amendment, or repeal of any provision herein except by vote of the people. TOM ARP MARY ANNE BOYLE June 22, 1989 City Council Meeting June 27, 1989 Mayor and Members of the City Council CERTIFICATION OF RESULTS OF SIGNATURE VERIFICATION OF INITIATIVE PETITION REGARDING DEVELOPMENT, USES AND UNLEASHED DOGS ON THE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY Attached is the Certificate of Sufficiency for the Initiative Ordiance submitted by petition entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING FURTHER DEVELOPMENT ON THE SANTA FE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, RESTRICTING USE OF THE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS, AND ALLOWING FOR UNLEASHED DOGS TO BE TRAINED AND/OR EXERCISED." The Election code directs that if a petition contains sufficient signatures and is certified to the city council, the legislative body shall either: (a) Introduce the ordinance without alteration at the regular meeting at which it is presented and adopt the ordinance within 10 days after it is presented; or (b) Submit the ordinance to the voters at the next regular municipal election occurring not less than 88 days after the order of the legislative body, or after the legislative body is presented with a report pursuant to Section 4009.5. Noted: evin B. Nor craft, City Manager 1 athleen Midstokke, City Clerk 122 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ) CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY Initiative Petition entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING FURTHER DEVELOPEMENT ON THE SANTA FE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, RESTRICTING USE OF THE PROPERTY TO EXISTING CONDITIONS, AND ALLOWING FOR UNLEASHED DOGS TO BE TRAINED AND/OR EXERCISED." I, KATHLEEN MIDSTOKEE, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT SAID PETITION IS SUFFICIENT, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The number of registered voters at the time the Notice of Intention was published was, according to the County Clerk's report to the Secretary of State: 13,005. 2. The number of signatures needed to qualify this proposed initiative for a general election is 10%, or 1,301. 3. The results of the signature verification by the Office of the L. A. County Registrar -Recorder is as follows: Number of unverified signatures 2,106 Number of signatures verified 500 a. Number of signatures qualified 427 b. Number of signatures not qualified 73 c. Percentage 85.40% THEREFORE, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET THE SEAL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. DATED: June 22, 1989 -2 thleen Midstokke, City Clerk REGISTRAR -RECORDER COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 5557 FERGUSON DRIVE - P.O. BOX 30450, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90030 CHARLES WEISSBURD REGISTRAR•RECORDER June 22, 1989 Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Dear Ms. Midstokke: Enclosed are 244 petition sections pertaining to an initiative measure submitted for signature verification on June 13. The results of the random sampling signature verification are as follows: Number of signatures filed 2,106 Number of signatures verified (5%) 500 Number of signatures qualified 427 (85.40%) Number of signatures not qualified 73 (14.60%) Total 500 Please call Alice Rivers of the Election Coordination and Legislation Section at (213) 725-5813 if you need any additional information. Very truly yours, sAV"*ki•tLki\A% CHARLES WEISSBURD Registrar -Recorder MT:D4:P/1 Enclosures Honorable Mayor and June 21, 1989 Members of the City Council ACTIVITY REPORT DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY MAY, 1989 Attached for your information are recap sheets of department ac- tivity for the month of May. Overall permit activity increased in May as the department issued 97 permits of which 36 were building permits. Three permits were issued for single family dwellings and one permit was issued for a duplex dwelling. Eighteen permits were issued for alterations or additions to existing dwellings. Eight dwelling units were demolished resulting in a net decrease of three dwelling units to the housing inventory. Building Department general fund revenue for 91.66% of the fiscal year is $407,021.55 or 104% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. Total revenue for all funds is $829,579.32. The Business License division reports that 165 licenses were is- sued during May resulting in revenue of $47,310.84. Business License revenue to date is $361,034.62 or 76% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. The department logged 12 new code enforcement complaints during May, of which five were for suspected illegal dwelling units. The department closed six cases during May and has twenty-seven cases under investigation. Noted: evin B. North ra t City Manager Respectfully Submitted, William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED TYPE OF STRUCTURE Month of May, 1989 DWELLING UNITS PERMITS PROVIDED VALUATION ing a 'we ngs 2. Dup ex Dwellings 1 2 295,422 3. Triplex Dwellings 4. Four Units 5. Five Units or More 6. Commercial Buildings 7. Industrial Buildings 8. Publicly Owned Buildings 9. Garages - Residential 10. Accessory Buildings 11. Fences and Walls 12. Swimming Pools 13. Alterations, additions or repairs to dwellings 18 272,985 14. Alterations, additions or repairs to Commercial Bldgs. 5 15,001 15. Alterations, additions or repairs to indus. bldgs. 16. Alterations, additions or repairs to publicly owned bldgs. 17. Alterations, additions, repairs to garages or accessory bldgs. 18. Signs 1 2,000 19. Dwelling units moved 20. Dwelling units demolished 8 -8 21. All other permits not listed 111 TOTAL PERMITS 36 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: 1,029,408. TOTAL DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED : 5 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DEMOLISHED: 8 NET CHANGE: -3 NET DWELLING UNIT CHANGE FY 88/89 +16 CUMULATIVE DWELLING UNIT TOTAL: 10,047 (INCLUDES PERMITS ISSUED) CITY OF SSA BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT Month Ending MAY 1989 NUMBER OF PERMITS Building Plumbing Electric Plan Check Sewer Use Res. Bldg.Reports Comm. Inspections Parks & Recreation In lieu Park & Rec. Board of Appeals Sign Review Fire Flow Fees LAST MONTH THIS MONTH 15 16 22 13 1 42 13 0 0 0 2 9 TOTALS 131 36 27 34 27 2 31 12 1 1 0 2 9 182 THIS YEAR TO DATE 329 262 261 169 22 392 179 6 29 1 30 102 THIS MONTH LAST YEAR LAST YEAR TO DATE 31 19 17 14 3 41 20 2 1 0 2 303 285 228 129 43 366 227 8 25 8 27 1,782 150 1,649 FEES Building** Plumbing Electric Plan Check Sewer Use Res. Bldg. Reports Comm. Inspections Parks & Recreation In lieu Park & Rec. Board of Appeals Sign Review Fire Flow Fees 32,561.74 1,334.00 3,395.00 8,837.82 27,404.80 1,680.00 325.00 0 0 0 50.00 48,509.50 11,563.29 2,130.00 5,957.00 19,325.90 1,244.02 1,240.00 300.00 3,500.00 6,534.00 0 50.00 7,469.00 188,207.22 25,377.00 36,953.00 135,371.33 44,057.68 15,728.00 4,610.00 40,602.00 160,083.00 75.00 700.00 177,815.09 18,809.63 131,309.81 1,622.00 26,044.50 2,103.00 34,365.00 8,196.25 94,942.01 1,316.11 20,491.88 1,640.00 14,430.00 500.00 5,675.00 21,000.00 56,000.00 6,534.00 165,617.00 0 600.00 50.00 675.00 TOTALS VALUATIONS 124,097.86 59,313.21 829,579.32 61,770.99 550,150.20 4,144,414 1,029,408 15,922,646 1,998.266 12,378,177 **Includes State Seismic Fee $73.26 1 a BUSINESS LICENSE REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MAY 1989 TO: Wm. Grove, Building & Safety Director FROM: Mary Fehskens, Administrative Aide DATE: May 31, 1989 NEW BUSINESS LICENSES ISSUED: Out of City License Issued: Home Occupation License Issued: New Business' Opened: New Owners of Existing Business: 38 9 4 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF LICENSES ISSUED: 52 BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWALS MAILED: 160 DELINQUENT NOTICES MAILED: 92 NEW & RENEWAL LICENSES ISSUED: 165 REPORTS SOLD: 0 BUSINESS LICENSE REVENUE: $47,310.84 BUSINESS LICENSE REVENUE YEAR-TO-DATE: $361,034.62 June 21, 1989 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL June 27, 1989 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT MAY 1989 Staff reports were prepared for the following: 1. 1 2nd Quarter General Plan Amendment --Biltmore Site Task 'Force reccommendation 2. 1 Restrictive Covenant for city owned parcels for sale 3. 2 Final Maps for 2 unit condominiums 4. 1 C.U.P for outdoor dining 5. 1 Status report on Special Studies including R-2 zoning density standards and options 6. 1 Memo regarding Grandfather Clause for Area 9 rezoning 7. 1 Text Amendment to eliminate video sales in C-1 & C-2 zones 8. 1 Memo from Planning Director regarding interpretation of the moratorium on height and possible amendment The following activities were undertaken for transit projects: 1. Routine tasks. Meetings and seminars attended by the Planning Department Staff: 1. 14 meetings Budget Update: Ending 04/30/89, expenditures were 10% below budget for 83% of the year. Ending 04/30/89, revenues were 9% above budget for 83% of the year. Transit Update: "WAVE" Dial -a -Ride Ridership: May 1989 HERMOSA BEACH (INCLUDING SATELLITES) Passengers: 1,005.00 REDONDO BEACH (INCLUDING SATELLITES) Passengers: 5,028.00 Total passengers: 6,033.00 Upcoming agenda items to City Council: 1 1. 1 Circulation Element 2. 1 Certification of oil drilling draft EIR 3. 1 Zone change for Northeast quadrant of MUC: From R-2 to R-1 and R-2 to R -2B 4. 1 Zone change for Northwest quadrant of MUC from C-3 to SPA, R-1 to R -1A and C-3 to R-3 5. 1 Text amendment regarding nonconforming uses and structures Respectfully submitted, CONC Mic :e c u•ac Planning Director NOTED: evin B. orthcr:f City Manager 2 Andrea -N. Anderson Planning Aide June 19, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 27, 1989 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, MAY 1989 A lot of activity has centered around the preliminary budget and the Budget Workshop on May 22. - The first physical inventory of fixed assets (since the appraisal) is being conducted in May and June. The purpose is to help maintain the integrity of the system and insure compliance with policies. The request for proposals for financial advisor is being mailed to four- teen firms in California. STATISTICAL SECTION FISCAL FISCAL MAY 1989 MAY 1988 YEAR TO YEAR TO DATE 89 DATE 88 CITATION PAYMENTS 4,876 3,515 51,278 53,954 INVOICES 3 15 78 112 CASH RECEIPTS 1,476 1,373 13,241 14,487 WARRANTS 245 296 3,255 2,936 PURCHASE ORDERS 270 287 3,248 3,040 UUT EXEMPTIONS 601 577 FILED TO DATE PAYROLL FULL TIME 157 148 PART TIME 53 46 Noted: 6ikt-z44A) 'Kevin Northc aft Viki Copeland City Manager Finance Administrator HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEM2TMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY kEPORT MAY 1989 FIRE STATISTICS PARAMEDIC STATISTiCS THIS MONTH THIS MONTH ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Total Calls 56 70 366 347 (TYPE) a. False Alarm 0 30 19 25 b. Mutual Aid 1 2 1 7 c. Paramedic Assists 38 35 184 190 d. Residence Fire 4 2 33 16 e. Commercial Fire 3 2 19 6 f. Vehicle Fire 3 * 12 * g. Hazardous Mtls. 3 * 14 * h. Other 4 26 84 103 PARAMEDIC STATISTiCS 0 THIS MONTH THIS MOS ATF!' ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Total Responses 83 88 410 437 (TYPE) a. No Patient/Aid 9 10 40 58 b. Medical 22 36 158 171 c. Trauma 52 41 211 199 1. Mutual Aid 0 0 0 1 2. Auto Accident 23 9 86 72 3. Strand Accident 12 9 30 39 4. Assault 13 8 45 38 5. Jail 6 0 30 27 6. Transports 34 42 196 179 7. Base Hosp.Con. 11 22 103 103 8. Trauma Center 0 2 4 4 INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION THIS MONTH THIS MONTH ONE YEAR AG) YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Commercial 37 103 362 463 2. Assembly 1 0 1 1 3. Apartments 86 18 144 91 4. Fumigations 15 8 74 50 5. Institutions 1 1 1 3 6. Industrial 0 0 5 10 NOTED: evin B.�thc raft, City Manager * figures not available ctf l ly mi tted, Director of Public Safety HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT MAY 1989 OFFENSES REPORTED THIS MONTH THIS MONTH THIS MONTH ONE YEAR. AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Murder 0 0 1 2 2. Rape 1 0 2 1 3. Robbery 2 0 12 9 4. Assault 13 6 60 31 5. Burglary 23 23 123 116 6. Larceny 39 30 185 166 7. Motor Vehicle Theft 8 4 57 61 8. DUI 31 12 105 140 9. All Other Offenses 359 245 1444 1330 PERSONS ARRESTED 1 KArr it. KCrUK 1 THIS MONTH THIS MONTH ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Adults 96 47 394 464 2. Juveniles 0 2 0 3 3. Criminal Citations 83 69 439 313 4. 5-24/5-42 HBMC 13 * 65 * 1 KArr it. KCrUK 1 THIS MONTH THIS MONTH [HIS MON1H ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST MAR TO DATE ACCIDENTS 0 0 0 0 1. Fatal 2. Injury 15 13 64 54 3. Property damage only 22 13 98 93 CITATIONS 434 148 1930 1089 1. Traffic Citations 2. Parking Citations 6 16 93 72 CALLS FOR SERVICE * figures not available NOTED: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager ctfull s bmitted, Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety THIS MONTH THIS MON1H ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST MAR TO DATE 1. Total Calls 2427 1606 11027 8716 * figures not available NOTED: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager ctfull s bmitted, Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety June 12, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting the Hermosa Bcach City Council June 27, 1989 PUBLIC WORKS -DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - MAY 1989 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION To coordinate and blend the efforts of all divisions 'of the Public. Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager; includes engineering and administration of capital improvement projects. Permits Issued: Type This Last Month Month FY 88-89 • FY To -date 87-88 Sewer Demolition Sewer Lateral Street Excavation Utility Co's only Dumpster/Lumber Drop Banner Permits 2 2 46 46 4 1 18 28 17 4 83 114 23 21 230 276 4 3 25 20 4 4 18 9 ENGINEERING Status of Current Capital Improvement Projects: The status of the Capital Improvement Projects will no longer be addressed at length in the monthly report as the status of these projects are presented to Council in the quarterly reports. However, projects now in progress are: CIP CIP CIP CIP 85-102 Highland Ave. Wide. 85-137 FAU, Asphaltic Over- lay,Valley/Ardmore 85-138 FAU/Traffic Signals 86-176 Traf. Cont. Pre-emp CIP 85-202 Hermosa Ave/Pier Ave Lighting CIP 87-405 CIP 88-406 CIP 88-407 CIP 88-508 CIP 88-610 CIP 88-614 CIP 89-615 MAINTENANCE The maintenance division of the Public Works divided into the following sections: - Parks/Medians - Street Maintenance/Sanitation - Sewer and Storm Drains - Street Lighting 1 Sewer Rehab/Area 3 Sewer Rehab/Area 4 Sewer Bonding Park Irrigation Rehab Comm. Ctr. Theatre Air Conditioning Municipal Pier Repair Comm. Ctr. Fire Alarm Department is - Traffic Safety - Building Maintenance - Equipment Service Parks Division: Conducted City-wide inspections of contract maintenance areas. Replaced volleyball nets north side of the Pier. Swing sets on the beach and in the parks were repaired. Infield repairs at Valley Park were completed. Located/adjusted and repaired as needed sprinkler heads in the school portion of Valley Park. Street Maintenance: - On-going graffiti removal. Put new • black -top on walkway at Clark Stadium behind the bleachers. • Removed timbers, bos and pier wench at end of the pier. Assisted sewer crew with collapsed sewer line in Valley Park and with opening the storm drains on 6th St. and Pier on the the beach. Completed street repairs ate30th Ct. and Ingleside (put in 2,5 ton of hot asphalt). Street Lighting: - Continued prep work for installation of new light poles on Hermosa Avenue (CIP 85-202). Set nine (9) new poles on Pier Avenue. Checked and repaired as needed outlets on Hermosa Avenue and Lot C in preparation for Festival. Replace light sockets in bowl area of Valley Park. Traffic Safety Division: - Completed repainting of street stops, stop sign bars, center lines and turn pockets after the slurry seal. Continuing to work on stop sign replacement. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: - On-going task of checking and rodding sewer lines. Opened storm drains on the beach and worked on collapsed sewer line in Valley Park. Cleaned catch basins on Hermosa Avenue at Pier Ave., 14th St., 22nd St., and Beach Drive and Pier Ave. Building Maintenance Division: - Maintenance workers continue to assist in janitorial duties due to absence of a custodian. Completed painting, shelves, and touch up in the Finance Department. Room 3, Community Center-stripped/waxes floor, patched walls and painted. Painted walls in Police Department. Continued sandblasting and painting outside steps at Community Center, west end of building. Equipment Service: - Parts inventory and on-going vehicle maintenance. Respectfully submitted, Ant •ny Antich Director of Pu mon2/pwadmin :mv lic Works Noted: -Kevin B. Northctaft City Manager June 20, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 27, 1989 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT MAY ACTIVITY REPORT Recruitment: * Completed or initiated recruitment and testing for the follow- ing classifications: 1. Maintenance I 2. Associate Planner 3. Clerk Typist 4. Public Safety Dispatcher * Solicited proposals for City Attorney services. A total of sixteen (16) proposals were received. Interviews of selected finalists by the City Council are scheduled for June 29, 1989. Labor Relations/Training: * Continued negotiations with the Firefighters' Association to- ward entering into a new multiple year Memorandum of Understand- ing (MOU). * The Department coordinated informational workshops for all employees (both safety and misc.) regarding the Public Employees' Retirement System (P.E.R.S.) and "how to plan for your retirement". * The Department coordinated attendance of city supervisors and managers at the monthly Employment Relations Consortium on "Em- ployee Evaluations". Risk Management: * The Department continues to monitor the changing federal re- quirements for reporting health insurance benefits as taxable income per IRC Section 89. * Attended workshop regarding health insurance cost containment. General Appropriations Secretary: * This position performs secretarial support services for all city departments as well as directory assistance for incoming calls and processing the City's mail. The following summary in- dicates the amount of time spent on each of the assigned functions: May: 180 work -hours available Word Processing * 27% (49.25 hrs) Avg. 2.74 hrs/day * Department Public Works: Planning Personnel • Finance • City Manager: 9% 17% 35% 17% 22% Mail Processing 14% (25.50 hrs) Avg. 1.42 hrs/day ( 4.24 ( 8.50 (17.25 ( 8.50 (11.00 Respectfully submitted, hrs) hrs) hrs) hrs) hrs) Directory/Misc Duties 59% (105.25 hrs) Avg. 5.85 hrs/day Noted: Robert A. Blackwood Kevin B. Northcraft Personnel Director City Manager June 15, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council June 27, 1989 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES MAY, 1989 ACTIVITY REPORT The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of May. SPECIAL EVENTS • May 13-14 marked the first annual Nordstrom High School Volleyball Tournament. The event ran smoothly. Permit Fees of $3,300 were collected on behalf of the City. • May 27-28 was the City -sponsored Men's A Division California Beach Volleyball Association Tourney. 38 teams participated in the annual event. City funds of $506 were expended. The expenses were offset by revenues collected of (entry fees) $495. • COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION May 6 was the Foundation sponsored "seis de mayo" event; Tito Puente. 359 attended the concert which was enthusiastically received. Fiesta de Las Artes weekend, the Foundation sponsored an information booth featuring membership, poster and T-shirt sales and general information dissemination on the Community Center. Plans were initiated for a Community Center Foundation Walk-a-thon scheduled for Sunday, July 9. Board Members and supporters will walk 5 miles to collect pledges for the Foundation. All proceeds will benefit the air conditioning fund. The Board has participated in fundraising and organizational workshops and as a result has gone through a reorganizaiton that will result in a more effective and efficient operation. The board has begun to plan a schedule of events for the next fiscal year. CHILDRENS THEATRE • Every Tuesday in May, at 4:00 PM the Civic Theatre filled with children who attended the "Tuesday is Theatre Day for Children" series. The program (now in its 5th year) featured free live theatre (concerts, puppet shows, plays) with professional performers. Attendance averaged 300 for each event. The cost to the City was $1,625. RECREATION PROGRAMING • The brochures for the June City-wide mailing were completed as was the Summer recreation programming. The brochure is to be mailed to all Hermosa residents in early June with classes scheduled to begin in late June. • The Spring Recreation Program was a success as witnessed by the following enrollment statistics: Adult Classes: Volleyball 60 Tennis ' 27 Computer 5 Dance 7 Total 99 Total Revenue: $1,912 Instructor Costs: $1,434 City's net share: 478 Youth Classes: Volleyball 9 Tennis 8 Karate 4 Jazz Dance 9 Drama 9 Total 39 Total Revenue: $776 Instructor's Costs: 582 City's Net Share: 194 MASTER PLAN • Staff and Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission reviewed the nine proposals submitted, interviewed the top three and recommended the firm of Purkiss-Ross to the City Council for Council action in June. CDBG . A RFP was developed and sent for professional services to assist the City in administering the CDBG program. GRANTS Staff continues to work with the State in closing out several recreation grants. Bid packages are being prepared for the various projects the City has approved. FILMING . There were three (3) days of filming in May. $1,500 in permit fees and $8,366 in police costs were collected. MEETINGS • Staff attended: Commission, Council, Foundation Board, Coordinating Council, Historical Society, Foundation Sub -committee, and 5 event planning meetings. FACILITY RESERVATIONS • In May we received approximately 40 calls per week regarding facility reservations. • New reservations this month include: Daily Bread, God Squad Productions, American Association of University Women, Little League Las Vegas Night. COMMUNITY CENTER MEETING ROOMS Hope Chapel Community Center Foundation Community Center Advisory Commission Friends of the Arts (FOTA) Teen Advocate Chamber of Commerce Little League" Pre/Post Exercise SuperKids Gym 1736 Family Crisis Center School Attend. Review Board (SARB) COMMUNITY CENTER GYMNASIUM L L Las Vegas Nite Tangen Basketball General Services Cascio Basketball Demoss Basketball Artiano Basketball Cohen Basketball Friedman Basketball Botelho Basketball Historical Society H. B. School District H. B. Personnel Young Actors Workout Jazz Dance Karate Sister Cities Acting Smokers Annonymus Bishop Montgomery HS Unity Church COMMUNITY CENTER LEASES Easter Seals Project Touch Hope Chapel Teen Advocate Center Dispute Resolution Historical Society Assoc. for Retarded Citizens (ARC) Comm. Center Spring Program Easter Seals SuperKids Gymnastics Meistrell Basketball Petricelli Basketball Cullen Basketball Gawlowski Basketball Schmidt Basketball Byron Basketball COMMUNITY CENTER THEATRE Hope Chapel H B School District Bishop Montgomery HS Comm. Center Spring Program Tito Puente Castro & Stone Productions CLARK BUILDING We average three private parties per month in addition to the following weekly/monthly meetings. Jazzercise Aerobics Senior Exercise Senior Club Meeting Women's Club Superkids Sunday AA meeting Monday AA meeting South Bay Unity Church Garden Club Friday AA City Testing Daily Bread God Squad Production American Assoc, of University Women CLARK FIELD Slow Pitch Little League Dog Obedience DEPARTMENT REVENUE: See attached. Noted: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager VALLEY PARK RESERVATIONS January, 19.88 February, 1988 March, 1988 April, 1988 May, 1988 June, 1988 July, 1988 August, 1988 September, 1988 October, 1988 November, 1988 December, 1988 January, 1989 February, 1989 March, 1989 April, 1989 May, 1989 Respectfully submitted, 1 0 4 7 7 18 16 14 7 8 3 2 1 2 8 6 14 Alana Mastrian-Ha an Director Dept. of Community Resources DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 1988/89 MAY, 1989 REVENUE COMMUNITY CENTER RENTALS $3,486.00 COMMUNITY CENTER LEASES 4,064.00 COMMUNITY CENTER THEATRE 4,263.00 CLARK BUILDING 1,297.00 SPECIAL EVENTS 6,035.09 TENNIS COURTS 1,254.25 $20,399.34 5/89 REVENUE TO DATE: $206,222.16 5/88 $168,207.88 REVENUE PROJECTION: PRESENT FISCAL YEAR: $194,500 REVENUE: ACTUAL: LAST FISCAL YEAR: $189,078 COMMUNITY RESOURGES,DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND REVENUE FOR 91 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR IS $206,222.16 OR 106 % OF THE PROJECTED FIGURE. COMMUNITY RESOURCES EXPENDITURES FOR 91 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR IS 82.8 % OR $ 295,969 DEPT. OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES REVENUE TO DATE NAY, 1989 1987-88 1988-89 COMMUNITY CENTER RENTALS $41,760.50 $48,125.61 COMMUNITY CENTER LEASES $55,307.54 $63,460.33 COMMUNITY CENTER THEATRE $15,370.39 $18,588.63 CLARK BUILDING* $23,736.50 $23,766.60 SPECIAL EVENTS* $21,604.70 $42,140.79 TENNIS COURTS $10.428.25 $10 140.20 168,207.88 206,222.16 *Finance report groups these two categories under the heading "Other Facilities". • •, •-Honorable Mayor and Members of •• the Hermosa Beach City Council June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting of June 27, 1989 • GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT . MAY ACTIVITY REPORT • ,PARKING ENFORCEMENT 5/88 5/89 87/88FY 88/89FY Parking Cites Issued 8,518 7,470 82,799 74,029 Vehicles Impounded/Booted 82 56 555 379 Calls Responded To 75 206 1,424 1,302 Booting Revenue $10,857.00 $9,510 $77,169.50 $60,950 ANIMAL CONTROL Citations Issued 43 66 698 575 Warnings Issued 0 1 10 2 Complaints Responded To 51 67 626 469 Total Number of Animals 51 66 551 546 Picked -Up of which: Returned to Owner 11 21 176 164 Taken to Shelter 21 20 193 181 Injured, taken to Vet 6 6 29 24 Deceased 13 19 194 180 CONCUR: Noon, Director G=TT-eral Services evin B. Northcr City Manager Respectfully submitted, Joan Noon, Director by . Mic e e D. Tercero, Administrative Aide