The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02/28/89"All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism." -Anonymous AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 28, 1989 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 6:30 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR Jim Rosenberger MAYOR PRO TEM June Williams COUNCILMEMBERS Roger Creighton Chuck Sheldon Etta Simpson CITY CLERK Kathleen Midstokke CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY James P. Lough All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PRESENTATION OF HERMOSA BEACH/LORETO SISTER CITY EXCHANGE STU- DENTS AND ADULT CHAPERONES BY SISTER CITY ASSOCIATION PRESIDENT GEORGE BARKS. PRESENTATION OF STATUS REPORT ON BILTMORE SITE BY BILTMORE SITE CITIZENS ADVISORY TASK FORCE. MEMORANDUM FROM CHAIRMAN GEORGE SCHMELTZER. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the item is called. Citizen comments on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction will be provided time at the end of the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on February 14, 1989; Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. Recommendation to receive and file Tentative.Future Agenda Items. Recommendation to receive and file the City Treasurer's report for January, 1989. Recommendation to adopt a resolution amending Resolution 84-4738 to reflect a change in the bail schedule per- taining to Animal and Fowl, Section 4-2, and requesting the Presiding Judge of the South Bay Municipal Court to enact such bail schedule. Memorandum from General Ser- vices Director Joan Noon dated February 21, 1989. Recommendation to receive and file analysis of Air Quality Management District Plan - transportation, land use, and conservation measures including its relation- ship to City's alternate work schedule. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 16, 1989. Recommendation to receive and file Fiscal Year 1986-87 Proposition A Subregional Incentive Transit Grant up- date. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 16, 1989. (h) 4,5 Recommendation to approve agreement with State of Cal- ifornia for Federal aid - Highland Avenue widening from ic/.6 Longfellow Avenue to 35th Street. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 16, 1989. Recommendation to adopt a resolution approving Final Map No. 17513 for a four -unit condominium at 1020 Monterey Boulevard. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 21, 1989. Recommendation to adopt a resolution approving Final Map No. 45183 for a six -unit condominium at 1522, 1524, 1530 Loma Drive. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 21, 1989. 2 (k) Recommendation to approve a month to month lease, for four (4) parking spaces on Lot •'G", to A & H Motors, contingent upon Planning Commission approval of a condi- tional use permit to operate an auto brokerage at 424 Pacific Coast Highway. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated Recommendation to adopt a resolution repealing Resolu- tion No. 88-5098 and establishing the salary and other terms and conditions of employment for the City Manager for the term February 1, 1989 through January 31, 1990. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat- ed February 22, 1989. Recommendation to receive and file informational report regarding testing for lead in the water supply at various City facilities. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated February 21, 1989. Recommendtaion to set the Sidewalk, Driveway, Curb and Gutter Damage Assessment for public hearing to be dis- cussed with the Capital Improvement Budget. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 7, 1989. Recommendation to authorize contracting with a consul- tant for audit of the Public Safety communications sys- tem and to appropriate an amount not to exceed $3,500.00. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated February 23, 1989. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. TO CONSIDER AMENDING SECTION 4-8, HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING AN OFF -LEASH DOG EXERCISE AND TRAINING AREA AT THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE GREENBELT/RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, WITH ORDINANCE FOR WAIVER OF FULL READING AND INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated February 6, 1989. 6. p/ PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT TO ELIMINATE ZERO LOT LINE IN R- o2B ZONE, WITH ORDINANCE FOR WAIVER OF FULL READING AND INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 21, 1989. 3 MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. MID -YEAR BUDGET REVIEW 1988-89. Memorandum from Finance Administrator Viki Copeland dated February 22, 1989. 8. REPORT ON REFUSE ENCLOSURE ENFORCEMENT. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated February 20, 1989. 9. PROPOSED URGENCY ORDINANCE PLACING MORATORIUM ON SALE OF VIDEOS OF ANY KIND IN ANY STORE IN THE C-1 OR C-2 ZONES. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated February 22, 1989. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated February 23, 1989. (a) Request by Councilmember Simpson for agenda item on the subject of school properties. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (b) Request by Councilmember Williams for discussion of how written communications are handled. (c) Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. Request by Councilmember Williams for reconsideration of City Manager housing assistance. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. (d) Request by Councilmember Simpson for discussion of public tours of Sanitation District Facilities. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back 4 (e) on a future agenda; or 3) reolution of matter by Council action tonight. Request by Mayor Rosenberger for discussion of L. A. County Earthquake Survival Program. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. 13. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. ADJOIIRNMENT r. CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS . Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. CITY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by visitor/users; ledby a City Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. • Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers THE'HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT • Hermosa Beach bas the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Ma- theoentireCouncil staff, doeswhat it. Thiseseparation ofe ipolicyamakingpandtadministration is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY • The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. • Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on•certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford the•public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week laterCouncil• may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting. Miscellaneous Items and Reports -.City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since.tbe agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of'the City Council may place items on 'the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council - These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business'district. 6 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM DATE: February 23, 1989 TO: Hermosa Beach City Council FROM: Biltmore Site Task Force (BSTF) RE: Biltmore Site Status Report The Biltmore Site Task Force began its deliberations at 7:00 P.M. on January 9, 1989 as directed by the City Council. Addi- tional meetings have been held on January 18, January 30, February 6, February 13, and February 22. Since February 6, all Task Force meetings have been carried live on Cable Channel 10 (with the exception of the February 22nd meeting). Meeting announcements and advertisements soliciting public input have been printed in 1/4 page ads in the Easy Reader newspaper. At our first meeting staff made available to all Task Force members a substantial amount of documentation relating to the Biltmore site. Requests for additional information have been responded to quickly by staff. Meeting agendas have been prepared by the Thursday preceding each scheduled meeting. Each agenda contains a 15 minute period for public testimony (to date there has been very little public testimony). At our meeting of January 30 the Task Force unanimously adopted a work plan. Essentially, the work plan calls for: 1. Soliciting proposals for the site from the public and from Task Force members. 2. Interviewing individuals deemed to have relevant information. 3. Workshop discussion/debate/resolution. Step 1 is on-going, and a list of potential uses has been established. Step 2 will be completed on February 27. Step 3 will begin at the meeting following our February 27 meeting. To date we have interviewed the following people: - City Manager - Public Safety Director - Planning Director - Building Director - Public Works Director - General Service Director - Finance Director - City Attorney - Chairman of the - South Bay Board - Director of the Commission - H.B. Chamber of Planning Commission of Realtors Representative South Coast District, Calif. Coastal Commerce President Our progress to date makes me confident that we will have a recommendation to you for your March 28 meeting. Attendance at meetings is excellent. Staff support is out- standing. Task Force members take their responsibilities seriously. Meetings have been characterized by courtesy, intel- ligence, frank questions, and frank answers. I look forward to the discussion/debate and resolution phase of our task. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to ask. Biltmore Site Task Force minutes should be available to you, along with the meeting agendas, at all times. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California held on Tuesday, February 14, 1989 at the hour of 7:37 P.M. CLOSED SESSION pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) regarding litigation: Escalante v. Hermosa Beach, Herriott v. Hermosa Beach, Wilhite v. Hermosa Beach, Zertuche v. Hermosa Beach, Gotanda v. Hermosa Beach, Creighton v. Hermosa Beach; and real property negotiations A.T. & S. F.; and Personnel. Present: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger Absent: None PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Simpson ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger Absent: None PRESENTATION OF $1,000 TO THE COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION BY THE KIWANIS CLUB TO BE USED FOR COMMUNITY THEATRE AIR CONDITIONING Cary Bichlmeier, of the Kiwanis Club presented the $1000 to Missy Sheldon, representing the Community Center Foundation. PRESENTATION OF 'EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER' AWARD: Vern Highfield, Public Works Superintendent Mayor Rosenberger presented the award and City Manager Northcraft presented dinner for two at C.J. Bretts to Mr. Highfield. CITIZEN COMMENTS Howard Longacre asked for these items to be pulled from the consent calender for discussion: (c) (d) (p) (s) and (y),. and requested to speak on 14(b) City Manager housing assistance. Wilma Burt asked for these items to be pulled from the consent calender for discussion: (v) and (z). Otto Palmer asked for item (y), from the consent calender, pulled for discussion. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (z) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (c) Longacre, (d) Longacre, (n) Simpson, (o) Simpson, (p) Simpson (s) Longacre, (v) Simpson (y) Longacre & Palmer, (z) Burt. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. - 1 - Minutes 2-14-89 Ia (a) (b) Recommendation to approve minutes as follows: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on January 24, 1989. 2) Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on January 31,1989. Action: To approve the minutes of January 24, 1989 and January 31, 1989 with an amendment to January 24 on Page 7: Consideration of Refuse Contract Alternatives, Item 2, add should be in enclosures. Motion Williams, second Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 28837 through 28844 inclusive, and 28846 through 29156 inclusive; noting voided warrants Nos. 28846 through 29000 inclusive (Computer Failure) and 29001 through 29004 inclusive and 29023, 29049 and 29059. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) (e) (f) Howard Longacre addressed the Council on this item and requested that the item on the old Prospect Heights School be a Public Hearing. Action: To receive and file. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Monthly Investment Report for January, 1989. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated February 6, 1989. Howard Longacre addressed the Council on this item. He made comments on the recent presentation regarding the financing of the Railroad right-of-way purchase, and that he was not in support of the idea of arbitrage. Councilmember Sheldon informed him that agenda item # 11 tonight addresses this financing. Action: To receive and file. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to receive and file report on Kiwanis Christmas Tree lot at Community Center. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated January 31, 1989. Recommendation to adopt resolution establishing sections of 16th Street as no parking zones and creating sections as loading zones. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 31, 1989. 2 Minutes 2-14-89 (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (1) Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5226, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. N.S. 2435, AS AMENDED BY ADDING THERETO A NO STOPPING ZONE AND A LOAD- ING ZONE ON A CERTAIN SECTION OF SIXTEENTH STREET AS HEREIN SET FORTH." Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #19302 for 2 -unit condominium at 330 Culper Court. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 6, 1989. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5227, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF, FINAL TRACT MAP #19302 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 330 CULPER COURT, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #18814 for 3 -unit condominium at 610 Ninth Street. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 6, 1989. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5228, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP # 18814 FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 610- 9TH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. Recommendation to approve plans and specifications and authorization to bid for Community Center fire alarm system (CIP 88-604). Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Anthony Antich dated February 6, 1989. Recommendation to receive and file information report about the "Wave's' new capability to transport school age children. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 6, 1989. Recommendation to deny claims for damages and refer to City's insurance adjusters, as follows: 1) Charles Gotanda, c/o Meghan Serwin, 1901 Ave. of the Stars, L.A., filed 1/19/89, alleged breach of contract; 2) William Lafay, c/o Vernon C. Krol, 18411 Crenshaw Blvd. #421, Torrance, filed 1/25/89, alleged dan- gerous condition; 3) Robert J. Collins, 1720 Ardmore Avenue, Hermosa Beach, filed 2/6/89, alleged police brutality. Recommendation to acknowledge receipt of $200 from the Save our Coastal Community committee. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated February 6, 1989. 3 Minutes 2-14-89 (m) (n) (o) (p) Recommendation to approve '74 Bond Act State Grant Fund final project. Memorandum from Community Resources Di- rector Alana Mastrian-Handman dated February 1, 1989. Supplemental memorandum from John & Kathy Dunbabin dated Feb. 14 in favor of fences. Action: To approve the purchase of a portable fence to be used at Clark field for Little League and Softball Leagues from funds remaining with the State grant (approx.•$7,958.) Resolution for adoption of implementation of new CEQA regulations. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 23, 1989. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5229, entitled 'A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 84-4677 AND ADOPTING THE REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES OF THE CALIFOR- NIA ENVIROMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AS AMENDED.' Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5229. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered. Recommendation to receive and file traffic safety evaluation by the Institute of Transportation Studies. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated February 6, 1989. Councilmember Simpson requested that a copy of this be made available to the Library as well as the City Clerk's office. Several Councilmembers will turn in their copies in order to make more available to the public. Action: To receive and file. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered, noting that recommendations will be implemented, and a review of this will come back towards the end of the calendar year. Recommendation to revise Goal No. 3 related to growth management/density reduction. Memorandum from City Man- ager Kevin B. Northcraft and Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 6, 1989. Addressing the Council on this item was Howard Longacre commenting on down -valuing of property, amoritizing of older building, and increased bootleg enforcement. Action: To revise Goal No. 3, Growth Management/Density and Bulk Reduction; continue methods designed to reduce density and look at ways in which to reduce bulk and increase the feeling of open space with new construction. Motion Sheldon, second Williams. So ordered. 4 - Minutes 2-14-89 Recommendation to receive and file results of SCAG Santa Monica Pollution symposium. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 7, 1989. A resolution concurring with the L. A. County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated February 6, 1989. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5230, entitled 'A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONCURRING WITH THE COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN. Recommendation to accept work as complete and final for Police Department remodel, first floor CIP 87-606. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 11, 1989. Addressing the Council on this item was Howard Longacre addressing recent newspaper articles regarding the Public Safety Director; and commending him for a job well done. Action: To accept as complete CIP 87-606, Police Department Remodel, and terminate contract with Stuart Construction Co. and authorize staff to: Withhold the full retention amount of $14,814.93, release Stuart Con- struction Co. from the faithful performance bond and the labor and materials bond, grant authority to the Public Works Director to notify the bonding company of the con- tractors failure to perform 100% of the work, accept as complete inspection services provided by Joncich, Sturm & Associates, and authorize staff to file a Notice of Completion. Motion Sheldon, second Williams. So ordered. Recommendation to accept work as complete - Bicycle path repairs (CIP 87-165). Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Anthony Antich dated February 1, 1989. Action: To accept as complete CIP 87-165, Bicycle Path Repairs and authorize staff to release the 10% retention payment to Neff Contracting Corp., less $1,387 in credits and deductions, release Neff Contracting Corp. from the faithful performance bond and the labor and materials bond, and authorize staff to file a Notice of Completion. Recommendation to receive and file status report on the Hermosa Beach Historical Society. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dated February 7, 1989. Minutes 2-14-89 (v) (w) (x) (y) Recommendation to approve Spring Recreation Program and appropriate the funds for this program. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dat- ed February 2, 1989. A staff report was presented by Director Mastrian- Handman and addressing the Council on this item was Wil- ma Burt, expressing that the program fees are too high. Action: To appropriate $7,500 from the General Fund unappropriated balance to the Dept. of Community Resour- ces for a Spring Recreation Program and the Youth Easter Week Program of Activities, with recommendations that any flyers or newspaper advertising include statements that no child will be turned down for lack of ability to pay. Motion Simpson, second Sheldon. So.ordered. Status report and recommendation on Employer -Employee Organization Relations Resolution. Memorandum from Per- sonnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 7, 1989. Action: To instruct staff to proceed with implementa- tion of an Employer -Employee Organization Relations Resolution (EEOR), and reaffirm its opposition to bind- ing interest arbitration on both legal and philosphical grounds. Recommendation to receive and file: 1) Draft Audit Report for Fiscal Year '87-'88; 2) Management Letter for Fiscal Year '87-'88. Memorandum from Finance Administrator Viki Copeland dat- ed February 8, 1989. Supplemental information memoran- dum from Viki Copeland dated February 14, 1989. Recommendation to adopt resolution amending the General Plan and ordering vacation of 21st Street at Loma Drive. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 6, 1989. Addressing the Council on this item were: Howard Longacre - supporting vacation, but not in the downtown area. Jerry Compton - representing Otto Palmer - requesting that Otto Palmer's name be removed (replaced with non- specific owner): on B would like a little more leeway than this language gives them; and that the northly lot be allowed an additional 500 square feet for a bonus room, with the footprint remaining the same. Mayor Rosenberger suggesting continuing the item for the applicant to meet with staff; and Councilmember Williams suggested that they present their requests in writing, to be included in a staff report. 6 Minutes 2-14-89 (z) City Attorney Lough stated that the item of Otto'Palm- er's name could be handled clerically by the City Clerk; but that the changes requested should be sent back to staff to review and also to review the minutes and mo- tions from the Public Hearing to make sure there are no problems with the changes. If there is a problem, then it would have to come back through the process. Action: To send -back to staff to verify that the foot- print is the same, and that it meets the criteria stated during the Public Hearing. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to approve increase in contract amount for slurry sealing, CIP 87-170 and asphalt street re- pair, CIP 87-171, Fiscal Year '88-'89. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 8, 1989. Addressing the Council on this item was Wilma Burt requesting street repairs on concrete streets east of Prospect. Action: To increase the contract amounty for construc- tion with Roy Allen Slurry Seal, Inc. at a cost not to exceed $169,028. (No additional appropriation is necessary.) Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 89-974 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, BY ADDING SECTION PERTAINING TO COST RECOVERY FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE CAU- SED BY PERSONS UNDER INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL OR DRUGS. For adoption. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated February 7, 1989. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-974. Motion Williams, second Creighton. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None Councilmember Creighton expressed that he supports this only for the emergency response, such as an accident; and not the simple citation. City Manager Northcraft clarified that the staff report upon introduction was clear that it was staff's intent to interpret the ordinance that anyone arrested while under the influence would be charged this user fee, regardless if it involved an accident or simply a traf- fic stop. 7 Minutes 2'-14-89 To be clear on legislative intent, although this is not Councilmember Creighton's desire, it was the majority intent of the Council to follow the staff's recommendation. Councilmember Williams expressed that anytime a drunk is driving a car, we have an emergency situation. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items c, d, n, o, p, s, v, y, and z were discussed at this time, but are listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. - None Councilmember Williams stated that Council does get many letters requesting Council action, and feels that these should be put on the agenda. She requested that this be put on the next agenda under council matters. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF A VARIANCE FOR SIDE YARD SETBACK AT 576 - 21ST STREET. (Continued from 1/24/89 meeting.) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 6, 1989. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach, in- cluding numbers of similar variances which have been granted in the recent past. The Public Hearing was opened. Speaking were: Appellant Richard Gallagher - 576 -21st Street - dis- tributed copies of the variance form and a list of homes which have received variances. Also speaking in favor of granting the appeal were: Wilma Burt - 1152 -7th Street Jerry Compton - 200 Pier Avenue # 9 Richard Doyle The Public Hearing was closed. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5231, entitled 'A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BECH, CALIFORNIA, CONCURRING WITH THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO DENY VARIANCES TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SECOND STORY AND FIRST FLOOR BEDROOM ADDITION WHICH WOULD ENCROACH TO WITHIN 3'2" OF THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED 5' AND A VARIANCE TO SECTION 1309 REGARDING ADDITIONS TO NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES AT 576 21ST STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE EASTERLY 25' OF LOT 43 AND THE WESTERLY 30' OF LOT 44, TRACT 1868. - 8 - Minutes 2-14-89 Motion Sheldon, second Williams. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None It was noted that the Planning Commission will be hold- ing Public Hearings on the Non -Conformity Ordinance in the near future, where this particular problem could be addressed. 6. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO EXCLUDE ADULT VIDEOS FROM A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR VIDEO SALES AND RENTALS AT 1312 HERMOSA AVENUE, HERMOSA VIDEO. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 17, 1989. (Continued from 1/24/89 meeting.) 14 supplemental letters in opposition to granting of appeal. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Appellant Scott Gallagher - submitted a petition with 200 additional signatures in support of the appeal Mark Hoffman - 437 -2nd Street - in favor of appeal Gerald Packra - 730 Camino Real R.B. - in favor Speaking in opposition to the appeal were: Victor Smith - attorney from Rutherford Institute - submitted memorandum dated February 14, 1989. Wilma Burt - 1152 -7th Street Tom Allen - 1602 The Strand Kary Reed - 1821 Pacific Coast Highway Dave Fordice - attorney from Culver City Michael Mitchell - 3rd Street Also speaking was Howard Longacre who requested no delivery of videos. The Public Hearing was closed. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5232, entitled 'A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW VIDEO SALES AND RENTALS, ADULT VIDEOS INCLUDED, AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1312 HERMO- SA AVENUE LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 8 AND 9, BLOCK 34, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH TRACT.", with the fol- lowing changes/additions: 1. Change No. 11 that there shall be a staff review and report to the Planning Commission and City Council every six months. 2. Add condition: No window displays of adult videos or correlary materials. - 9 - Minutes 2-14-89 3. Add condition: No other adult types of materials for sale, meaning no novelty items. 4. Add condition: Store shall be managed in manner that anything illegal for a minor to view shall not be displayed. 5. Add condition: No home delivery of videos. Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - Simpson, Williams Further Action: To adopt a Resolution of Intention No. 89-5233 to send to the Planning Commission to study removing all video sales from C-1 and C-2 and to study as part of this amortizing any businesses of a noncon- forming nature. Motion Sheldon, second Simpson. SQ ordered. Final Action: To bring back an Emergency Moratorium next meeting to preclude until the study of the Planning Commission is finished the sale of videos of any kind in any store in the C-1 or C-2 zones. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. 7. CONDITIONAL ZONE CHANGE FROM M-1 AND OPEN SPACE TO R-2 WITH MAXIMUM OF 13 -UNIT CONDO OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 603 FIRST STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 6, 1989. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Pat Killin - Project Architect 312 S. Catalina Polly Schneider - 157 Ardmore - opposed Warner Lombardi - 1849 Valley Park - questions, men tioned problems with other recent subdivision. Karey Holby - 719 -1st Place - opposed Jan McHugh - 718 -1st Place - opposed John McHugh - 718 -1st Place - opposed Action: To deny zone change and send to Planning Com- mission to study changing the General Plan designation to low density at the next quarterly General Plan Review. Motion Williams, second Creighton. AYES - Creighton, Simpson, Williams NOES - Sheldon, Mayor Rosenberger - 10 - Minutes 2-14-89 MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. REVIEW OF A GRADING PLAN FOR POWER STREET SUBDIVISION, TRACT NO. 30986. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 7, 1989. Supplemental information from Jim A. Marquez dated February 9, 1989. Supplemental letter from Warner Lombardi dated February 14, 1989. Due to the fact that the City Engineer had left the meeting due to illness (it was appx. 11:50 P.M. at this time), this item was continued to Tuesday, February 21, 1989. Action: To continue all items remaining on the agenda except for items 12 and 14 to an Adjourned Regular Meet- ing to be held on Tuesday, February 21, 1989 at the hour of 6:00 P.M. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. 9. STUDY OF BUS BENCHES AND SHELTERS. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 11, 1989. (Continued from 1/24/89 meeting.) This item was continued to February 21, 1989. 10. ANNUAL REPORT OF ACTIVITIES - 1988. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated February 9, 1989. This item was continued to February 21, 1989. 11. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE CONTRACT FOR LEGAL SERVICES IN FINANCING OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION. (Continued from January 31, 1989 meeting.) Memorandum from Finance Ad- ministrator Viki Copeland dated February 9, 1989. This item was continued to February 21, 1989. 12. REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF COUNCIL POLICY REGARDING APPLICATIONS FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated February 6, 1989. A staff report was presented by Director Wisniewski requesting council direction to confirm the protest of all new applications or only off-site consumption applications. Proposed Action: To lodge protest against all on sale and off sale alcoholic beverage licenses in Hermosa Beach. Motion Creighton, second Williams. AYES - Simpson, Williams NOES - Creighton, Sheldon, Mayor Rosenberger No further action was taken on this item. Minutes 2-14-89 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) Recommendation to reduce costs by revising Planning Com- mission minute procedures. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated February 6, 1989. This item was continued to February 21, 1989. (b) Status of audit .of Public Safety Dispatch system. Memo- randum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dat- ed February 6, 1989. This item was continued to February 21, 1989. 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Recommendation to approve a policy statement supporting a ban on assault rifles. (Requested by Councilmember Simpson). Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. North - craft dated February 6, 1989. Action: To send letters to Assemblyman Roos and Senator Roberti, supporting control of use of certain automatic assault weapons. Reference AB357 and SB292. Letters to provide for individual signatures of Councilmembers. Copy letters to local legislators and anyone else ap- propriate with request that they support control of automatic weapons. Motion Simpson, second Sheldon. So ordered. (b) Review of City Manager employment agreement including salary and consideration of housing assistance. (Con- tinued from January 24, 1989 meeting.) Memoranda from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood and City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated February 7, 1989. Addressing the Council on this item were Howard Longacre and Wilma Burt. Action: To approve the Performance Evaluation Form. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the objection of Williams. Further Action: To give the City Manager a 9% raise effective February 1, 1989. Motion Sheldon, second Simpson. AYES - Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - Creighton, Williams At this time Howard Longacre called a point of order due to the Cable TV being off the air. (Appx. 12:30 A.M.) - 12 - Minutes 2-14-89 Final Action: To grant a $250,000 loan at 10% with the following parameters; amoritized over 30 years and due in five years; due on sale clause; no prepayment penal- ties; notice of default; callable on 120 day notice at any time; callable on termination, involuntary or volun- tary; not to exceed a maximum of 65% loan to value ra- tio; and a first mortgage only. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting the objections of Creighton and Simpson. 15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL 16. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Howard Longacre - requested a Public Hearing regarding how the city communicates with the public and how to improve it. Thinks the Council meetings should be re- played as other cities do. Councilmember Creighton volunteered to work with him on this. Jim Lissner - requested that Council obtain further in- formation regarding changing Gould Avenue speed limit from 35 to 25 MPH. He has already talked to the Public Works Director and City Attorney on this, and would like further study done. Parker Herriott - addressing the Cable TV being out, and the Biltmore Open Space Initiative Petition. ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California adjourned on Wednesday, February 15, 1989 at the hour of 1:08 A.M. to an Adjouned Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, February 21, 1989 at the hour of 6:00 P.M. 1(aeltdr,lt}*‘;421?1X) City Clerk - 13 - Minutes 2-14-89 1. t Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 16, 1989 Regular Meeting of February 28, 1989 SUBJECT: FY 1986-87 Proposition A Subregional Incentive Transit Grant Update. Recommendation Receive and File. Background On November 17, 1986, LACTC dispursed $9,400 of the approved $28,000 Incentive funds for the Hermosa Beach Commuter Bus (HERMAN). On January 22, 1987, Manhattan Beach dropped out of the Commuter Bus program. Thus, making Hermosa Beach eligible for only $12,679 and leaving $3,279 yet to be received. Following review of the next submitted quarterly report, LACTC determined that the data collected by our Commuter Bus contractor, Mark IV Charter Lines, was not inconformance with their reporting standards and refused to release additional funds until the data was corrected. Specifically, "trip sheets" were either incomplete or inaccurate on the critical data element of "passenger miles". The problem was discovered by LACTC when the cost per rider dropped dramatically with the change in contractor, Mark IV to CTS. At that time, LACTC requested to examine the method Mark IV had collected the data. The samples Mark IV gave to LACTC showed they were collecting the data correctly, but when the auditors examined the records, trip sheets were missing information; the auditor's statement was "massively wrong data". Although City staff collected existing data and hired an independent auditor in an attempt to develop a statistically valid sample, it was concluded by the auditing firm that it was impossible to calculate passenger mile data within the UMTA accuracy requirements, because of lack of proper collection and thus the $9,400 would have to be returned. On January 19, 1989, staff held a meeting with Richard Derock, Senior Transportation Analyst for LACTC, to discuss possible solutions to this problem. 1 lg Following our discussion, staff concurred on the following solution: 1. Instead of returning the funds, reduce next years annual Prop. "A" appropriation by $9,400, since the entire annual allocation is not needed to operate the transit programs next year. 2. Pursue recovery of lost funds by approaching Mark IV Charter Lines. This approach has been used effectively by other cities according to LACTC. Mic ael S Planning Director if 7 evin B. Northc.raft City Manager 2 Respectfull Submitted, 1 A ex Hernan•ez Assistant Planner --1 February 22, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of February 28, 1989 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISHING THE SALARY AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR THE POSITION OF CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND: Kevin B. Northcraft was initially appointed as City Manager on February 22, 1988. At the City Council meeting of January 24, 1989, the council ap- proved certain amendments to the existing employment agreement with the City Manager. These amendments are: 1. Addition of provision for a Breavement Leave of three days as had been included in the Management Association contract. 2. As suggested by the City Manager, deleted reference to specific life insurance providers in Section 10 to allow for administrative leeway in providing amount of coverge at more competitive rates. 3. Amended language of Section 12, Management Option Benefit, to delete reference to additional P.E.R.S payments, and allow for selection of benefits at any time during the year. On February 14, 1989, the City Council approved a 9% increase in the City Manager's compensation. Also approved at that February 14th meeting was a Performance Based Compensation Program for use in determining future changes in compensation. Following final revisions to the evaluation form and instruction- al handbook, the Performance Based Compensation Program will be distributed to the council. As part of the program, the Mayor will appoint a sub -committee in July to meet with the City Man- ager to review his agreement and make any recommendations on changes or adjustments to language items. Completion of the evaluation form and subsequent meetings with the City Manager will be scheduled during the month of November. 11 ANALYSIS: The above mentioned changes to the employment agreement with the City Manager have been incorporated into a new agreement which is referenced in the attached Resolution. All changes in the agreeement are indicated in BOLD type. Respectfully submitted, Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 88-5098 AND ESTABLISHING THE SALARY AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR CITY MAN- AGER KEVIN B. NORTHCRAFT FOR THE TERM FEBRUARY 1, 1989 THROUGH JANUARY 31, 1990. WHEREAS, Kevin B. Northcraft was initially appointed to the position of City Manager on February 22, 1988; and WHEREAS, the term of the initial agreement was for a one year period; and WHEREAS, the City Council and Kevin B. Northcraft have reviewed and agreed upon certain changes to that initial Employ- ment Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the Employment Agreement with Kevin B. Northcraft is extended effective February 1, 1989. 3. That the salary compensation established by the City Council effective February 1, 1989 shall be an annual amount of Seventy Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty dollars (S70,850) to be paid bi-monthly. 4. That other benefits and forms of compensation consistent with City policies and ordinances, shall be described in a sepa- rate Employment Agreement which the Mayor, on behalf of the City 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Council, is hereby authorized to execute and sign. Said Employ- ment Agreement is attached hereto as "Exhibit A". PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 28th day of February 1989 PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR, of the City of Hermosa Beach California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the 1st day of February 1989, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, Califor- nia, a municipal corporation hereinafter referred to as "City," and KEVIN B. NORTHCRAFT, hereinafter referred to as "City Manager." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City enacted Resolution No. 89- on February 28, 1989; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to provide cer- tain benefits, establish certain conditions of employment, and to set the working conditions of the City Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: SECTION 1. Duties: City hereby agrees to employ said KEVIN B. NORTHCRAFT as City Manager of said City to perform the functions and duties specified in the City Code, to serve as Executive Dierctor of the Hermosa Beach Parking Authority and as Executive Director of Vehicle Parking District No. 1, and to perform such other legally permissible and proper duties and functions as the City Council shall from time to time assign. SECTION 2. Term: A. Nothing in this agreement shall prevent, limit or other- wise interfere with right of the City Council to terminate the services of the City Manager at any time, except as provided in this agreement, subject to the provisions set forth in Article 1 II, "Administration" of the City Code. B. The term of this agreement shall commence February 1, 1989• This agreement shall continue until a new agreement is negotiated and agreed to by the parties. If no such agreement is reached and the City Manager is terminated from his office, the provisions of Section 4 shall apply to such termination. SECTION 3. Hours of Work: City and City Manager jointly recognize that the require- ments of the job involve more than 40 hours per week. City Man- ager is authorized to utilize flex time in the performance of his duties and, with the approval of the Mayor, compensatory time off not to exceed 16 hours per month. SECTION 4. Removal From Office: A. In the event that City removes City Manager from office pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code provision 2-18, as amen- ded, City shall pay, upon demand of City Manager, three months base salary as severance pay, provided, however, that the City shall have no obligation to compensate said severance pay in the event that the City Manager is terminated because of his convic- tion of any illegal act of moral turpitude which would cause a person to be barred from holding office. B. It is also understood and agreed by the parties that the City Manager will be retained for a minimum of three months fol- lowing any municipal election pursuant to section 2-22, as amen- ded, of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. This provision will enable new Councilmembers to adequately assess the City Manager's performance. C. No termination, except for the conviction of an illegal act referenced above, shall be effective without the giving of thirty (30) days written notice by the City. SECTION 5. Salary: A. The annual salary set by this agreement shall be Seventy Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty dollars (i70,850.00). B. Each July, the Mayor shall appoint a sub -committee to meet with the City Manager to review this agreement and make recommendations to the City Council regarding changes or adjust- ments to language items. Any approved changes shall be effective on January 1st of each year. C. During November of each year, the City Manager's perfor- mance shall be evaluated per the Performance Based Compensation Program approved by the City Council on February 14, 1989. Any adjustment to the City Manager's compensation as a result of the evaluation shall be effective on January 1st of each year. SECTION 6. Automobile; The City Manager is authorized to use the city vehicle designated for his exclusive use as herein set forth. The City shall pay the costs of the automobile lease not to exceed $210 per month and shall be responsible for the maintenance, repair, operation and insuhance of said automobile. SECTION 7. Dues and Subscriptions: A. City agrees to budget and to pay the professional dues and subscriptions of the City Manager necessary for his continua- tion and full participation in national, regional, state and lo- cal organizations. 3 B. Professional Development; 1. City hereby agrees to budget and to pay certain travel and subsistence expenses of City Manager for professional and official travel, meetings, and occasions adequate to continue the professional development of City Manager, including but not limited to the payment of annual attandance at the Annual Con- ference of the International City Management Association. 2. All Conferences, meetings, etc., more than 200 miles distance from City Hall will be subject to specific advance approval of the City Council. 3. City shall reimburse City Manager for two-thirds (2/3) of his actual education expenses directly associated with his professional development subject to prior approval by the City Council. SECTION 8. Vacation, Sick, Holiday, Breavement Leave: A. The provisions of the Management Association Memorandum of Understanding, as enacted November 23, 1988 or any subsequent agreement, shall govern in regards to provisions for vacation, sick, holidays and breavement leave. B. Upon termination or resignation, unused vacation shall be paid at 100% of the current monthly compensation rate and un- used sick leave at 50% of current monthly compensation rate. SECTION 9. Retirement: City Manager shall be covered by the miscellaneous city em- ployees retirement system as a contracting member of P.E.R.S. City also agrees to pay City Manager's retirement share of P.E.R.S., up to 7.0% of base salary. SECTION 10. Medical and Insurance Benefits: A. The provisions of the Management Association Memorandum of Understanding, Article 4, as enacted subsequent agreement, regarding Health, Vision Insurance shall govern and there coverage for Health Insurance. B. City Manager shall annually be provided with a complete physical examination at the Daniel Freeman Hospital Center for Heart and Health Improvement (or equivalent) at City expense. C. City is to also provide: November 23, 1988 or any Dental, Mental Health shall be full family and 1. Term life insurance in the amount of $270,000. (note: no change in amount. Allows for purchase at competitive rate) 2. Payment to the American Society for Public Ad- ministration Disability Insurance program, coverage limited to that now afforded to City Manager; and 3. Liability, Errors and Omissions Insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000) as now afforded by City. SECTION 11. Team Building: City and City Manager agree team building and/or goal setting by City. The selection, duration to authorize and participate in sessions as may be prescribed and content of these sessions will be at the discretion of the City Council. SECTION 12. Management Option Benefit: A. Purpose: To provide a management benefit package which allows the City Manager to select benefits according to his individual needs. B. Objectives: 1. To enhance the ability of the City to attracat and retain a high caliber City Manager; 2. To provide the City Manager with a choice of bene- fits; and 3. To provide recognition and incentive for effective and efficient management of the City's operations and to recog- nize that a city manager often works irregular and unscheduled overtime hours without extra compensation. C. Amount of Benefit: The benefit shall be two point five percent (2.5%) of the annual base salary, computed on the basis of the monthly salary, plus any unused portion forwarded from Section 10. D. Benefit Options: Benefit options are to include: 1. Educational Allowances: Educational allowances are as outlined in Section 7B3, costs incurred in excess of 66%. 2. Deferred Compensation; City Manager may receive all or part of his benefit as con- tribution into either the City's Deferred Income Plan or the plan administered by the ICMA Retirement Corporation. Under this op- tion, the amount selected will be distributed over the entire year as equal contributions into the Deferred Income Plan. 3. Cash Payment: City Manager may take all or part of his benefit as a one- time cash payment in December or for each of the 24 paydays during the year. 4. Additional Insurance, i.e., Group Auto Insurance or Homeowner's insurance: City Manager may take all or part of his benefit in the form of additional insurance. E. Selection of Benefits: City Manager may select and/or change benefits at any time. (note: administrative change only) SECTION 13. Deferred Compensation: At no cost to City, City Manager may elect to participate in the city-wide deferred compensation plan or said plan as adminis- tered by the ICMA Retirement Corporation. SECTION 14. General Provisions: A. In the event City Manager voluntarily resigns his posi- tion with City, City Manager shall give City forty-five (45) days written notice in advance. Severance pay is not applicable to voluntary resignation. B. Moving Expenses Incurred: City agrees to reimburse the City Manager for expenses in- curred in moving his household and personal possessions to a location reasonably close to the City of Hermosa Beach. C. If any provision or portion of this agreement is held to be unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable, then the remainder of this agreement or portions thereof shall be deemed severable, shall not be affected, and shall remain in full force and effect. D. The text herein shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH has caused this agreement to be signed and executed in its behalf by its Mayor, and the City Manager has signed and executed this agree- ment, both in duplicate, the day and year first above written. MAYOR, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH KEVIN B. NORTHCRAFT CITY MANAGER CMEA/CONTRACT City of Hermosa Beach . CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TRANSMITTAL FORM Date of Council meeting: 2(.74 Submitting Department: 12-gJn1NJ%L- Approved by: Date: 2..1-2.-2,1 f SPECIAL COMMENT: YG Regular Item Public Hearing Resubmitted Item Item Returned for Specific Date Addendum Item Item has been Publicized for Specific Supplementary Material Date Public Notification has been made Material Available Monday/Tuesday 1 ADINGS: Plaques, Commendations, Proclamations )4 1. Consent Calendar 2. Written Communications from Public 3. Public Hearings/Hearings 4. Municipal Matters 5. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager 6. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council 7. Other Matters - City Council J'ESCRIPTION OF ITEM: (Should be sufficient to inform public of what item is) Ve3N.A4740 AA:. Cal nuoirM14e742, Corv►iE" .4:0 4) MATERIAL SUBMITTED FOR ACTION: Ordinance(s) for Adoption Maps/Sketch/Exhibit Resolution(s) for Adoption Visuals (Copy Attached) Contract/Lease Agreement Other Supporting Material (Describe) CITY MANAGER'S APPROVAL Signature Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 16, 1989 Regular Meeting of February 28, 1989 SUBJECT: ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN -TRANSPORTATION, LAND USE, AND CONSERVATION MEASURES INCLUDING ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY'S ALTERNATE WORK SCHEDULE. REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER PURPOSE: IDENTIFY ANY NEW REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED UPON CITY Recommendation Receive and file. Background Recently, the Air Quality Management District developed a new plan to control air pollution. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) executive committee and the Air Quality Management District Board will meet together at the Carson Center on March 17th to consider the plan for adoption. If the Los Angeles region does not adopt a plan in compliance with federal mandates, a plan will be imposed and administered by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Analysis The plan has been significantly revised to shift from a dependence on region -wide regulations by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) to actions by local governments. Attached is a list of requirements found within the plan that the City will be expected to implement. It should be noted that the following are not noted as alternatives, but rather as specific air quality control measures which are part of an overall program to improve air quality to a level which will meet federal and state standards. However, what kind of enforcement, or penalty for non-compliance is not certain at this time. Local governments are not necessarily bound by the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). However, the District has stated the following: "The District is prepared to work directly with local government to achieve AQMP implementation goals. Additional impetus for cooperative efforts will come from other sources, including the possible imposition by the court of a federal implementation plan, potential sanctions by the EPA, public pressure for improved air quality, financial benefits for tourism, and reduced health care cost, amoung others." 1 lf From examining the attached AQMP control measures, it is recognized that the City's alternate work schedule, 4-10 Plan, is part of the District's plan to reduce pollution. Also, Senate Bill 2723 (Seymour), has been introduced in the state legislature to require state agencies and departments to establish a goal of ridesharing by 50% of state employees. It should be noted that only those control measures which relate to the city are included in the attached data. Complete AQMP on file in City Clerk's office and Planning Department. CONCUR: Sevin . North'clt City Manager fran/air Planning Director 1. ALTERNATIVE WORK SCHEDULES AND LOCATIONS 1. a. ALTERNATIVE WORK WEEKS ANO FLEXTIME SUMMARY SOURCE CATEGORY: Light Duty Auto/Light and Medium Duty Truck CONTROL METHODS: TIER I o Implement a specific 10% work trip reduction program for local government employees using alternative work schedules by January 1, 1990. o Adopt local trip reduction ordinances which require alternative work schedules as a condition of business license renewal and as a permit condition for new development by January 1, 1991. o If necessary, expand Regulation XV or adopt an Indirect Source Regulation by January 1, 1992, expanded to require employers to produce a 10% reduction in work trips utilizing alternative work schedules. Rule adoption.with effective date no Tater than January 1, 1993. o SCAG, SCAQMD, and local governments. look at legisla- tion by January 1, 1990, to remove impediments to • alternative work schedules in management bargaining agreements. TIER II No additional control methods. IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES: Local Governments, SCAQMD IMPLEMENTATION ASSUMPTIONS FOR ALL ALTERNATE WORK SCHEDULE STRATEGIES: Sixty percent of the work force in 2010 will participate in alternate work schedules, 20% of work trips will be reduced by telecommuting. TIER I Six percent of total projected emission reductions by January 1, 1994. 111 1 0 1 9 1 y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. b. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SUMMARY SOURCE CATEGORY: Light Duty Auto/Light and Medium Duty Trucks CONTROL METHODS: TIER I o Adopt by January 1, 1991, a specific program of telecommunications/work-at-home strategies to reduce work trips by local government employees by 20%. o ARB and EPA to promulgate a.telecommunications/work- at-home program to reduce state and federal agency employees trips by 20% by January 1, 1992. o Local governments adopt ordinances by January 1, 1994, requiring satellite work centers. o Telecommunications program promulgated by state and federal agencies in the region by January 1, 1991. o If necessary, expand Regulation XV or adopt an Indirect Source Regulation, by January 1,,1993, to reduce work trips by 20% through telecommuting: o Support non -work trip reduction legislation by January 1, 1992. TIER II o Adopt local ordinances by January 1, 1999, to require 5% of space in multiple facilities for satellite work centers. o Agencies and local governments work toward tax incentive legislation. IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES: SCAQMO, Federal, state, and local governments. IMPLEMENTATION ASSUMPTIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE WORK SCHEDULE STRATEGIES Sixty percent of the work force in 2010 will participate in alternate work schedules, 20% of work trips will be reduced by telecommuting. TIER I Six percent of total projected emission reductions by January 1, 1994. 4- 2. MODE SHIFT STRATEGIES 2. a. EMPLOYER RIDESHARE & TRANSIT INCENTIVES SUMMARY SOURCE CATEGORY: Light Duty Auto CONTROL METHODS: TIER I o Adopt ordinances by July 1, 1990 to require trip reduction plans for facilities with tenants employing more than 100 employees. o Adopt ordinances by January 1, 1991 to require facilities employing 25 to 99 employees to disseminate information on trip reduction. o Evaluate effectiveness of reducing ordinance employee level threshold to 25+ by 1992. o If necessary, expand Regulation XV, by January 1, 1993, to cover businesses with 25 employers or more. • o SCAQMD, SCAG and local governments should encourage the formation of Transportation Management Associations. TIER II No additional control methods. IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES: Local governments and/or SCAQMD. IMPLEMENTATION ASSUMPTIONS FOR ALL MODE SHIFT STRATEGIES Emission reductions for all Mode Shift Strategies are calculated together and are based on an assumed 6% mode shift. TIER I Local government actions by January 1, 1994 will lead to 12% of total projected emission reductions. TIER II Eighty-eight percent of the emission reductions will occur between 1994 and 2010. 2. b. PARKING MANAGEMENT SUMMARY SOURCE CATEGORY: Light Duty Auto, Light and Medium Duty Trucks CONTROL METHODS: TIER I By July 1, 1990, conduct local assessments and adopt Air Quality Element to: o Increase daytime parking fees o Establish a surcharge on parking for single occupant vehicles and/or discount for multi -occupant vehicles' ,o Eliminate peak -period on -street parking o Eliminate 100% employer subsidized parking o Require employer-sponsored preferential parking for ridesharers for employers of 100+ employees (short-term) and 25+ employees (long-term) o Residential parking zones/permit programs • o Implement short-term commercial parking zones o Park-and-ride lots with shuttle service o Establish a cap on the number of parking spaces in a zone o Establish a cap on the number of parking .spaces permitted per square foot for a particular use o Increase parking enforcement • TIER II No additional control methods. IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES: Local government. IMPLEMENTATION ASSUMPTIONS FOR ALL MODE SHIFT STRATEGIES: Emission reductions for all Mode Shift Strategies are calculated together and are based on an assumed 6% mode shift. TIER I Local government actions by January 1, 1994 will lead to 12% of total projected emission reductions. TIER II Eighty-eight percent of the emission reductions will occur between 1994 and 2010. 6 2. d. MERCHANT TRANSPORTATION INCENTIVES SUMMARY SOURCE CATEGORY: Light Duty Auto/Light and Medium Duty Truck CONTROL METHODS: TIER I • o Adoption by January 1, 1991 of non -work trip reduction ordinances which would require merchants (large retail establishments) to offer customer mode -shift travel incentives and require owners/managers/developers of retail establishments to provide facilities for non -motorized •transportation needs. (See Control Measure 2.a. for Transit•Incentives, 2.e.: Auto Use Restrictions.) o If necessary, adoption by January 1, 1992, of an SCAQMD Indirect Source Rule to implement the same control methods. TIER II No additional coctrol methods. IMPLEMENTING • AGENCIES: Local government/SCAQMD. IMPLEMENTATION ASSUMPTIONS FOR ALL MODE SHIFT STRATEGIE$ Emission reductions for all Mode Shift Strategies are calculated together and are based on an assumed 6% mode shift. TIER I Local governments actions by January 1, 1994 will lead to 12% of total projected emission reductions. TIER II Eighty-eight of the emission reductions will occur between 1994 and 2010. PRIMARY BENEFITS FOR ALL MODE SHIFT STRATEGIES TIER I 0.62 T/da ROG reduction by 1994. 2. e. AUTO USE RESTRICTIONS SUMMARY SOURCE CATEGORY: Light Duty Auto/Light and Medium Duty Truck CONTROL METHODS: TIER I o Adoption of Air Quality Element into General Plans by July 1, 1990, which will identify the local applicability of requiring special event centers to operate ' park -n -ride and off-site facility lots, requiring auto free zones, requiring street closure • during peak periods, and enhancing transit performance. o Adoption by January 1, 1993, of a local auto -free zone ordinance, to require, as •applicable, special event centers with occupancies of 10,000+ capacity to establish and operate Park -n -Ride and off-site facility lots with shuttle service, require discounted transit passes to be advertised and offered for sale with event tickets, and require each center to have a transit coordinator to manage traffic flow. (See related Control Measure 2.b.: .Parking Management;• 2.d.: Merchant Transit Incentives). o Require implementation of auto free zones in areas of dense pedestrian activity in conjunction with designated off-street or remote parking facilities (Park-n-Ride/Shuttle services) by January 1, 1994. (See related Control Measure 2.d.: Transit). o Require street closures during peak periods of heavy pedestrian activity. o Provide enhancement of transit performance and availability in auto restricted zones. (See Control Measure 2.d.). o If necessary, adoption of SCAQMO Indirect Source Rule for special event centers, or expansion of Regulation XV to require the above. TIER II No additional control methods. IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES: Local government/SCAQMD r y r 1 1 y 3 1 y 1 3 3. GOODS MOVEMENT 3. a. TRUCK DISPATCHING, RESCHEDULING & REROUTING SOURCE CATEGORY: SUMMARY Light Duty Auto/Light, Medium, and Heavy Duty Truck CONTROL METHODS: TIER I o Adopt local Air Quality•Elements in General Plans by July 1, 1990, to alter truck delivery by re- routing trucks and changing the time of delivery. o Adopt local ordinances and MOUs by July 1, 1990, to alter truck delivery. o If necessary, adopt by July 1, 1991, a SCAQMD Truck Delivery Rule to alter truck activity. TIER II Implement computerized navigation and dispatching systems by 1995. IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES: Local governments and the private sector, CHP, SCAQMD IMPLEMENTATION ASSUMPTIONS FOR GOODS MOVEMENT STRATEGIES: Tier I Local government action by 1990 leading to 9% of total projected emission reductions to 1994. Tier II Ninety-one 'percent of the emission reductions will occur between 1994 and 2010. PRIMARY BENEFIT FOR GOODS MOVEMENT STRATEGIES Tier I 0.85 T/da ROG reduction by 1994. 4. TRAFFIC FLOW IMPROVEMENTS SOURCE CATEGORY: CONTROL METHODS: IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES: IMPLEMENTATION ASSUMPTIONS: PRIMARY BENEFIT: SUMMARY Light Duty Auto, Light and Medium Duty Trucks, Heavy Duty Trucks Tier I o Caltrans, SCAG, and Transportation Commissions and implement "Constrained" RMP ramp meters by-pass lanes between 1989 and 1993. program and HOV o Local government implement ATSAC systems and similar interconnected signal contr.,l systems or appropriate non -interconnected synchronization methods on 2000 signalized intersections between 1989-1993 and 8000 by 2010. o Local government improve channeling of 125 intersections between 1989-1993 and 500 by 2010. Tier II Caltrans, SCAG and Transportation Commissions obtain funding, and program and implement "Unconstrained" RMP . ramp meters and HOV by pass lanes. CALTRANS, Local governments, Transportation Commissions, SCAG Additional 600 freeway ramps metered, 8,000 signals synchronized, and 500 intersections improved. Tier I 25% of the emission reductions will occur by January 1994. Tier II 1, 75% of the emission reduction will occur between 1994 and 2010. Tier I —Iv 5. NONRECURRENT CONGESTION SOURCE CATEGORY: CONTROL METHODS: IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES: IMPLEMENTATION ASSUMPTIONS: PRIMARY BENEFIT: SUMMARY Light Duty Auto, Light and Medium Duty Trucks, Heavy Duty Trucks Tier I Design and program improvements by 1989-1993 to: o Expand•and improve incident response programs o Improve freeway management and enforcement practices o Increase enforcement of codes governing loads and vehicle safety o Develop and secure funding for OWP Elements Tier II No additional control methods. CHP, Caltrans, local jurisdictions, SCAG • Improved response to approximately 200 (67%) of major incidents would reduce 750,000 vehicle hours of delay annually. Tier I 25% of the emission reductions will occur by January 1, 1994. Tier II 75% of the emission reductions will occur by January 1, 1994. Tier I 4.72 Tons/Day CO reduction by 1994. Tier II 14.18 Tons/Day CO reduction by 2010. 1 t— 18. GROWTH MANAGEMENT SUMMARY SOURCE CATEGORY: Light Duty Auto, Light and Medium Duty Truck, Heavy Duty Truck CONTROL METHODS: Tier I o Local Governments amend general plans by July 1, 1990, incorporating procedures to attain job/housing balance targets 'consistent with the .Growth Management Plan, when adopted. o Local Governments adopt ordinances by July 1, 1990, to attain job/housing balance targets consistent with the Growth Management Plan when adopted. . o Local Governments develop interregional agreements by January 1, 1992, for the attainment of job housing balance targets set for Tier II (1994-1999) of the implementation process. Tier II o SCAG to assess effectiveness of local programs by January 1, 1994, and proceed, if necessary to recommend further actions to be implemented through SCAQMD, RWQCB's and HCB. IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES: Local Jurisdictions, SCAG, SCAQMD, RWQCB's, HCB, Sanitation District IMPLEMENTATION ASSUMPTIONS: Redistribution of 5 percent population and housing growth (285,000 pop., 123,000 HU), and 9 percent jobs growth (300,000) Tier I 4% of the emission reductions will occur by January 1, 1994. Tier II 96% of the emission reductions will occur between 1994 and 2010. PRIMARY BENEFIT: 19.a. LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY CONSERVATION SOURCE CATEGORY: CONTROL METHODS: IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES: IMPLEMENTATION ASSUMPTIONS: PRIMARY BENEFIT: SUMMARY Fuel Combustion: Other Services and Commerce, Electric Utilities Tier I o By January 1, 1990 adoption of local administrative practices to reduce local government energy demand 8% by January 1, 1994, 15% by 2000, and 30% by 2010. o Expand SB 880 program to allow assistance and funding for special districts. o By January 1, 1990, the California Energy Commission affirms its commitment to continue to develop and finance technical assistance, training and energy projects. Tier II . No additional control methods. Local jurisdictions, special districts, State for Funding Incentives Government commitment to reduce energy consumption by 30%. Tier I None of the emission reductions will occur by January 1, 1994. Tier II 100% of the emission reductions will occur between 1994 and 2010. Tier I No primary benefit by 1994. /3 _ February 21, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of February 28, 1989 RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE INFORMATIONAL REPORT REGARDING TESTING FOR LEAD IN THE WATER SUPPLY AT VARIOUS CITY FACILITIES RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council receive and file this report. BACKGROUND: A meeting between City Councilmembers, staff, and representatives of the California Water Service Company was held on August 12, 1988. This meeting was held to discuss fire flow and water quality concerns of the Council. The Water Company agreed to test various locations throughout the City for lead content in the water. A list of locations was submitted to the Water Company and tests were conducted, the results were furnished on September 20, 1988. Although the results indicated that there was no detectable lead in the water distribution system, there was lead detected in the drinking fountains at Valley Middle School and in a home system on Ardmore Ave. This lead content was reduced to safe limits after the water was allowed to run for at least 5 minu- tes. This "flushing" of the system indicates that the lead content originated from the plumbing materials and fixtures in the home and school, not from the water mains. Following these tests, Council felt it would be prudent to have the water tested at all City operated facilities and instructed staff to request additional tests. ANALYSIS: The results of the additional tests, conducted at nine different locations, were received from the Water Company on February 2, 1989. These results indicate that most of the locations contained no detectable lead. Two locations had traces of lead but they were well below the current, as well as more stringent proposed, lead standards for safe drinking water. Steve S. Wisniewski Director of Public Safety CONCUR: / Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 1280 NORTH FIRST STREET • P. 0. Box 1150 • SAN JOSE, CA 95108 • (408) 298-1414 January 30, 1989 Kevin Northcraft City Manager 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear Mr. Northcraft: We have completed the special sampling and lead analyses at various city facilities as specified by the Director of Public Safety in his letter of January 10, 1989. Two samples, one first flush and one after two minutes flushing, were collected from nine different locations (see enclosed report form). Most samples contained no detectable lead (less than 0.005 milligrams per liter). The remainder of the samples showed only traces of lead at levels well below the current lead standard of 0.05 mg/L for drinking water. Proposed lead limits at the tap range from 0.010 to 0.020 mg/L and, as can be seen on the enclosed form, all samples would comply with even this very stringent standard. We are happy to have been of assistance in this matter and hope that these results satisfactorily address your concerns. If I can be of any further help, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, ( / RHT:bf mond H. Taylor Director of Water Quality cc: Mr. Ken Roed, CWS, San Jose Mr. Walt Delsigne, CWS, Hermosa Redondo Mr. Steve Wisniewski, Hermosa Beach, Attachment • REPORT ON PARTIAL CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER COMPAN'f- California Water Service Company LABORATORY San Jose PLANT Hermosa -Redondo DATE COLLECTED REPORTED TO See Below 1989 WJD REASON FOR TEST Special - Lead Study TEST NO. PtO; DATE OF TEST See Below 1989 DATE OF REPORT 1-27-89 BY Anne Liu Supervising Chemist SOURCE OF SAMPLE Date Sam•led Date Tested 1-20 11 It " il II0 II " II 1-25 II II Run Time 0 2 min. 0 2 min. 0 2 min. 2 min. 0 2 min. 0 2 min. 2 min. 0 2 min. 0 2 min. 'Lead 0.006 <0.005 0.005 0.007 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 � "" 1035. Valley Drive II It „ Clark Stadium Valley Park 500 Fourth St. If 11 11 North end of railroad (right of way) II II II II II Middle Railroad -right of way II II It II IIII Police Dept. - hose bib0 City Yard" u II Fire Dept. - hose bib 1-19 II II ir It /I II II 1-23 II BY Anne Liu Supervising Chemist A Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 7, 1988 Regular Meeting of February 28, 1989 SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, CURB AND GUTTER DAMAGE ASSESSMENT Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. set this matter for public hearing to be discussed with the capital improvement budget. Background: For the past several months staff has been conducting an inventory, by address, of all damaged sidewalks, curb and driveways in the City, logging the following: 1. Square or lineal footage of damage, 2. The type of damage, and 3. Any cable T.V. or utility involvement. During this period, staff surveyed eight (8) south bay cities to determine their policies regarding repair and maintenance of sidewalks. Additionally, two (2) other surveys were obtained from Lakewood and the League of California Cities regarding sidewalk, curb and gutter repair. Information regarding these surveys is listed below (these surveys are available for review in the office of the City Clerk). SURVEY League of Calif. Cities Lakewood Public Works South Bay El Segundo Hawthorne Lawndale Manhattan Beach Palos Verdes Rancho Palos Verdes Redondo Beach Torrance NO. OF CITIES SURVEYED SURVEY DATE 154 March 1988 43 1986 8 Jul•Dec. 1988 Data from these surveys is presented for the following concerns: Criteria for Damage Repair/Financial Responsibility Repair Options Funding Options However, not every survey answers each of these concerns because not every survey asked the same questions. - 1 - 1n Analysis: This analysis is divided into the following categories: 1. Criteria For Damage a) City Attorney Comments b) Survey Results c) Public Works Department Recommended Policy 2. Inventory a) Inventory Method b) Estimated Repair Cost 3. Repair Responsibility a) State Highway Code b) City Code c) Survey Results d) Recommendation 4. Repair Options a) Survey Results b) In-house vs Private c) Recommendation 5. Who is Going to Pay for a) City Responsibility b) Property Owner c) Shared Owner/City 6. Summary Contractor the Repairs? 1. Criteria for Damage 1a) City Attorney Comments: There is no case law determining whether one inch or one-half inch is an appropriate measurement of what constitutes a foreseeable risk. However, the City has a mandatory duty to take measures against known dangerous conditions pursuant to Government Code Section 835 and 840.2. If the City has made a reasonable determination that a one inch displacement creates a foreseeable risk, therefore a dangerous condition, the City must take immediate action to avoid accidents and liability. See Government Code 835 and 840.2 in the City Clerk's office for review. lb) Survey Results: As the surveys below indicate, the measurements used by the various cities to define "damage" covers a wide range: 1/4" to 6" and over. By a wide margin, however, the two measurements most used in both surveys are 1" and 3/4". Survey Range 2 MOST USED CRITERIA IN EACH SURVEY Lakewood 1/2 - 6" Public Works South Bay 1/4 - 3" plus 1 inch 3/4 inch 26.0% 14.0% 25.0% 37.5% lc) Public Works Department Recommended Policy: The Public Works Department has been using the criteria established by Los -2- Angeles County which states that "when vertical displacement or any depression is 1" or more..." repairs are necessary (see attachment). Staff believes this is a reasonable criteria for repair. 2. Inventory 2a) Inventory Method: The inventory was done in-house over a period of several months. The City was divided into smaller areas which were inspected on foot by employees given a map, measuring tape, and a one inch marker (criteria for repair) to determine the type and extent of damage, by address, of all City sidewalks, curbs, and driveways. 2b) Statistical Summary of Inventory Data: In an effort to make the data more meaningful, it has been analyzed in various ways as shown below. NUMBER OF LOCATIONS: MOST DAMAGE TYPE: LEAST DAMAGE TYPE: SQUARE FOOTAGE: (sidewalks) LINEAL FOOTAGE: (curbs) 1,290 Cracked (601) Separated (3) 45,803 1,889 ESTIMATED REPAIR COST: $ 253,339 EST. 25X CONTINGENCY: $ 63,335 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $ 315,674 HIGHEST ESTIMATED COST: $ 4,500 (per location) LOWEST ESTIMATED COST: $ 25 (per location) AVERAGE ESTIMATED COST: $ 245 (per location) 3. Repair Responsibility 3a) Street and Highways Code: Chapter 22, Subsection 5610. Duty of property owners: Liability for conditions created by grantees of city permits, etc. states, "The owners of lots or portions of lots fronting on any portion of a public street ... shall maintain any sidewalk(*) in such condition that the sidewalk will not endanger persons or property and maintain it in a condition which will not interfere with the public convenience ..." * Section 5600. Sidewalk "As used in this chapter 'sidewalk' includes a park or parking strip maintained in the area between the property line and the street line and also includes curbing, bulkheads, retaining walls or other works for the protection of any sidewalk or of any such park or parking strip." 3b) City Code: Since the City is "silent" on this subject of sidewalk repair, we rely on what State Code says (see 3a above) . 3c) Survey Results: The surveys below addressed only financial responsibility. The figures show that a vast majority of cities accept financial responsibility for the repair of sidewalks, curbs and gutters; less than 10% share such costs - 3 - with property owners. Neither survey addressed what criteria was used in assigning responsibility. SURVEY League of Calif. Cities (sidewalks) League of Calif. Cities (curbs & gutters) Public Works South Bay (sidewalk, curb & gutter) CITY OWNER CITY/OWNER SHARE 73.0% 18.0X 85.0% 12.0% 62.5% 37.5% 8.0% 3.0% 0.0 However, the responsibility for repair and maintenance of sidewalks is more than financial. The City has the responsibility to ensure that the public right of ways are maintained and free of potentially hazardous conditions. 3d) Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City designate property owners as responsible for all repairs and maintenance of sidewalks abutting their private property, as specified by State law. However, such a policy should include the City in shared responsibility, i.e. inspection and damage assessment programs. 4. Repair Options 4a) Survey Results: Only the Public Works South Bay survey addressed the issue of who does the physical repairs. The results are shown below. SURVEY Public Works South Bay CITY CONTRACTOR CITY/CONTRACTOR 25% 25% 50% 4b) In -House vs Private Contractor: IN-HOUSE This would require considerable added expenses to the City. Our present equipment and personnel is inadequate for the task; therefore, additional outlays in both areas would be necessary. PRIVATE CONTRACTOR There would be added administrative costs to the City with this process, but they are smaller when compared to those for in-house. Actual repair costs would probably be less, initially, than those of in-house. In assessing these two options, the following should be kept in mind: If the total cost of a project exceeds $5,000, the City is required by State law to go to the formal bid -4- process. However, this does not exclude the City from making temporary emergency repairs, nor prevent owners from selecting their own licensed contractors. Also, regardless of who pays, either process may be used. For example, the property owner is financially responsible in both Manhattan Beach and Rancho Palos Verdes, but Manhattan Beach does all repairs in-house, while Rancho Palos Verdes uses the formal bid process. 5. Who is going to pay for the repairs? Below is a table showing how the cost to the City and/or property owner would change as the percentage of responsibility assigned to each party varied from 0% to 100% in 25% increments. X ESTIMATED I % ESTIMATED OF CITY I OF PROPERTY OWNER RESPONSIBILITY COST RESPONSIBILITY COST 1 1 0% $ 0 I 100% $ 315,674 1 25% $ 78,919 ( 75% $ 236,756 1 50% $ 157,837 I 50% $ 157,837 75% $ 236,756 1 25% $ 78,919 100% $ 315,674 I 0% $ 0 5a) City: Various funding sources available to the City are listed below if this option, either fully or in part, is adopted as part of City policy. ESTIMATED BALANCE FUNDING SOURCES 6/30/89 General Fund (desig- nated for CIP projects) $384,091 State Gas Tax $ 15,186 With regard to the present inventoried repairs, those sources that are immediately available are of particular interest. Now, that the City is aware (on notice) of the extent and location of City-wide damage, it's liability could be increased if repairs are not made in a timely manner. 5b) Property Owner: The following table shows various cost ranges and the number of locations in each range. Out of a total of 1303 locations, less than 25 fall into the $1000 and over cost range, while over 1200 properties fall below $500. 5 ESTIMATED NO. COST RANGE OF LOCATIONS $ 4500 - 3000 4 $ 3000 - 1500 3 $ 1500 - 1000 14 $ 1000 - 500 70 $ 500 - 250 184 $ 250 - 100 460 Under $100 568 There would be an additional cost not shown in the preceding data if the owner is responsible, even in part, i.e. the City's administrative costs, including the notification, billing and collection process as set forth by State law. In 1984, an administrative fee of 19% of the total of any particular project cost was instituted by the City. This would mean that the owner paying the highest repair cost would also pay the highest administrative fee. Also, in this particular instance, the actual administrative costs would vary more as a function of owner cooperativeness rather than the size of the repairs. Given these circumstances, some owners might easily feel that insult was being added to injury. Therefore, a specified dollar amount could be considered as a cap for this fee. 5c) Shared Owner/City: Less than 10% of cities surveyed employ this option. The administrative expenses incurred by the City for partial owner payment would be exactly the same as those to obtain full payment. 5d) Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City pay for all repairs currently inventoried, excluding damage caused by utilities and cable T.V. This would be a one-time occurrence, in no way reflecting any change in the underlying assumption of City policy designating responsibility to the property owner. Therefore, after these repairs are completed, the property owners would be required to pay for all future repairs, as determined by the City, including the 19% administrative fee not to exceed $100. This policy should not result in financial hardship to the average owner. The data from our present inventory shows the average estimated cost per location to be $245, while the cost of approximately 90% of all repairs falls below $500 for each location. 6. Summary Until now, the City has had no sidewalk repair policy. As the inventory shows, the amount of damage and subsequent cost varies, but the number of properties involved is extensive, nearly City wide. To affect such a number of property owners all at once would, in all probability, raise an outcry among the citizenry. - 6 - Alternatives: Alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. REPAIR WORK: Determine that all the City. 2. FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: a) Determine that the City for the cost of repairs. b) Determine that the City of repairs. ectfully submitted, ony Antic Director of •lic Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: UNAVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE Viki Copeland Finance Administrator repair work shall be done by is 100% financially responsible and property owner share the cost Concur : Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Credits: Public Works Field Crew Inventory Terry Bindman, Public Works Dept Survey & Data Compilation sda pwadmin :tb/mv 7 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H DENNIS*ALLEN REIMB/EMP PD CITY INS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00895 001-400-1212-4188 01290 02/16/89 $2.016.77 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL **************Baa*******************************r*-******************* H BANK OF AMERICA JAN EXP/R. BLACKWOOD H BANK OF AMERICA - ---JAN EXP/R. BLACKWOOD - PAGE 0001 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO Si CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *2.016.77 00180 001-400-1203-4201 00430 $5.00 02/15/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00180 001-400-1203-4315 00032 ----02/15/89- PERSONNEL $18.00 -/MEMBERSHIP - ----- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H BEACH TRAVEL AIRFARE/C. SHELDON *23.00 07092 29163 $0.00 02/22/89 07091 29160 $0.00 02/22/89 07091 29160 $0.00 --02/22/89 00252 001-400-1101-4317 00298 $258.00 00234 29159 - -- - - -- 02/15/89 CITY COUNCIL ---/CONFERENCE EXPENSE - --- --- -• --- - $0.00- 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************-******************************* H C. D. O. A. - - - -• - REG/THOMPSON/DERKS - --- 02693 001-400-2101-4317 --TR238 - 02/21/89- - - POLICE $258.00 00106 $170.00 TR238 00238 26167 --/CONFERENCE EXPENSE• ------ --- --- - - -- $0. 00 - - 02/22/89 - - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICIALS -- - REG/BOOKLET/B. GROVE - - *170.00 00411 001-400-4201-4316 00139 $225.00 -- 02/16/89 BUILDING - /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H CLARION HOTEL 02692 001-400-2101-4317 HOTEL/THOMPSON/DERKS- -TR238 •-- -- 02/21/89 POLICE *225.00 00107 $237.60 /CONFERENCE EXPENSE- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT r---------•----SAL/1-16 TO 1-31-89 -- I b ; b H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT SAL/2-1 TO 2-15-89 00243 001-202-0000-2030 -- 02/01/89 00243 001-202-0000-2030 02/15/89 $237.60 07512 29162 $0.00 02/22/89 TR238 00238 26166 -- $0.00 02/22/89 00259 $183.851.68 28845 - /ACCRUED PAYROLL--- - -- --- $0.00 - 02/22/89 00260 *229.655.65 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 29161 $0.00 02/22/89 yr 1 46, fit /fb �Y. be br $I► I r - FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H H H 14 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT TERM CHECK/A. HERNANDEZ HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT SAL/1-16 TO 1-31-89 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT SAL/1-16 TO 1-31-89 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT SAL/1-16 TO 1-31-89 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT SAL/1-16 TO 1-31-89 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT SAL/1-16 TO 1-31-89 H HERMOSA CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00243 02/23/89 00243 02/01/89 00243 -- 02/01/89 00243 02/01/89 00243 02/01/89 00243 02/01/89 BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 SAL/1-16 TO 1-31-89 ----- 02/01/89 001-202-0000-2030 105-202-0000-2030 110-202-0000-2030 145-202-0000-2030 155-202-0000-2030 160-202-0000-2030 705-202-0000-2030 00261 00145 00146 00141 00142 00140 00103 81. 645. 93 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $6.053.85 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $39. 705. 74 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $1,918.77 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $3.207.94 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 86. 988. 49 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $21.161.97 /ACCRUED PAYROLL- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES REG/ANTHONY ANTICH TR237 PAGE 0002 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $494.190.02 00317 001-400-4202-4317 00043 $120.00 02/21/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * H PROTECTIVE NATL INSURANCE CO. LIAB DED/ADAMS/DOSLAND $120.00 02691 705-400-1209-4201 00076 $2,000.00 02/15/89 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT VENDOR TOTAL ****************************************************************** ** H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. JAN 89 RETIREMENT ADV H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JAN 89 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JAN 89 -00026 001-400-1213-4180 00275 02/13/89 RETIREMENT 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00276 02/22/89 RETIREMENT 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00277 02/22/89 RETIREMENT $2.000.00 $73.226.34 /RETIREMENT $75.194.04 /RETIREMENT $73. 226. 34CR /RETIREMENT 29169 $0.00 02/23/89 28845 $0.00 02/22/89 28845 $0.00 02/22/89 28845 $0.00 02/22/89 28845 $0.00 02/22/89 28845 $0.00 02/22/89 28845 $0.00 02/22/89 TR237 00237 29164 $0.00 02/22/89 07090 29158 $0.00 02/22/89 29157 $0.00 02/22/89 29168 $0.00 02/23/89 29168 $0.00 02/23/89 Y` r' r FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:03:32 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/JAN H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/JAN H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/JAN H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/JAN H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/JAN H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/JAN H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/JAN H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/JAN H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/JAN H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/JAN RETIREMENT SYS. 89 RETIREMENT SYS. 89 RETIREMENT SYS. 89 RETIREMENT SYS. 89 RETIREMENT SYS. 89 RETIREMENT SYS. 89 RETIREMENT SYS. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00026 105-400-2601-4180 00090 $749.53 02/22/89 STREET LIGHTING /RETIREMENT 00026 110-400-3301-4180 00091 $169.67 --02/22/89 VEH PKG DIST /RETIREMENT 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00091 $4,712.30 02/22/89 PARKING ENF /RETIREMENT 00026 145-400-3401-4180 00065 02/2/89 DIAL A RIDE /RETIREMENT $172.31 00026 145-400-3402-4180 00065 02/22/89 ESEA 00026 145-400-3403-4180 00016 • 02/22/89 $58.54 /RETIREMENT $15.94 BUS PASS SUBSDY /RETIREMENT 00026 155-400-2102-4180 00063 89 -- 02/22/89 RETIREMENT SYS. 89 RETIREMENT SYS. 89 RETIREMENT SYS. 89 $218.54 CROSSING GUARD /RETIREMENT 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00090 • 02/22/89 $860.44 SEWER/ST DRAIN /RETIREMENT 00026 705-400-1209-4180 00016 •- 02/22/89 $137.92 LIABILITY INS /RETIREMENT 00026 705-400-1217-4180 00016 02/22/89 $137.92 WORKERS COMP /RETIREMENT PAGE 0003 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO # CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************i*************************** $82,427.15 H TOM*THOMPSON MEALS/THOMPSON/DERKS TR238 01009 001-400-2101-4317 02/21/89 POLICE 00105 $114.50 /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** R JOHN*ALNES 02678 001-210-0000-2110 $114.50 $581,782.04 29168 $0.00 02/23/89 29168 - $0.00 02/23/89 29168 $0.00 02/23/89 29168 - - $0.00 02/23/89 29168 $0.00 02/23/89- 29168 2/23/89- 29168 $0.00 02/23/89 29168 $0.00 02/23/89 29168 $0.00 02/23/89 $0.00 29168 02/23/89 -- 29168 $0.00 02/23/89 TR238 00238 • 29165 $0.00 02/22/89 02684 $75.00 70554 07155 29174 WORK GUAR REFUND 70554 02/16/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/22/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION • DUES/M. SCHUBACH - 48765 - PAGE 0004 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $75.00 00854 001-400-4101-4315 00086 $143.00 02/01/89 PLANNING /MEMBERSHIP- -- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSN DUES/HIGHFIELD/OLSON • R AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSN DUES/B. GENGLER 00401 001-400-3104-4315 00004 02/09/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00401 001-400-4202-4315 00035 02/09/89 PUB WKS ADMIN $143.00 $80.00 /MEMBERSHIP ---- $40.00 - - - -- - - $40. 00 /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ANASTASI CONSTRUCTION WORK GUAR REFUND 59068 00004 001-210-0000-2110 02/16/89 $120.00 48765 06082 29175 $0.00 02/22/89 07700 29176 $0.00 02/23/89 07700 29176 $0.00 02/23/89 02677 $175.00 59068 07166 29177 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R APOLLO LEASING COMPANY LTD LEASE PMT/MAR 89 $175.00 02558 001-400-3104-6900 00008 $841.29 02/15/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/JAN 89 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/JAN 89 •--- R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/JAN 89 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/JAN 89 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/JAN 89 00152 001-400-2201-4309 00635 01/31/89 FIRE 00152 001-400-3104-4309 00173 01/31/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00152 001-400-4204-4309 01236 01/31/89 BLDG MAINT 00152 001-400-4205-4309 00341 01/31/89 EQUIP SERVICE 00152 110-400-3302-4309 00511 01/31/89 PARKING ENF $841.29 $20.48 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $8.75 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - $96.34 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $21.00 -/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $7.20 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00066 29178 $0.00 02/23/89 00017 29179 $0.00 02/23/89 00017 29179 - $0.00 02/23/89 00017 29179 $0.00 02/23/89 00017 29179 $0.00 02/23/89 00017 29179 $0.00 02/23/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION -CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -- DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************.***********.*.********************************* R AV-OX/PROFIRE MISC CHGS/JAN 89 PAGE 0005 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $153.77 00603 001-400-2201-4309 00636 $261.33 935980/935992 00016 29180 35992. 01/31/89 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 02/23/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R AVIATION LACK & KEY --MSC CHCS/JAN 89 - R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHCS/JAN 89 R AVIATION LOCK & KEY -- MISC CHGS/JAN 89 -- $261. 33 00407 001-400-2101-4305 00918 $31.60 ---01/31/89 POLICE --/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00407 001-400-4204-4309 01234 $82.18 01/31/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00407 001-400-4601-4305 00617 $9.59 - 01/31/89 - COMM RESOURCES --/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES-- ---- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BALDWIN CONSTRUCTION 02695 001-210-0000-2110 -• -WORK GUAR REFUND - - 67035 • - 02/16/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL $123.37 00015 29181 $0.00 02/23/89 00015 29181 $0.00 02/23/89 00015 29181 $0.00 02/23/89- 02688 2/23/89- 02688 $1.575.00 67035 07161 29182 /DEPOSITS/WORK• GUARANTEE- - $0.00 02/23/89 ******************************************************************** R BANC ONE LEASING 99 -LEASE PMT/MAR 89 - $1. 575.00 02154 001-400-4205-6900 00026 $417.96 02/15/89 EQUIP SERVICE --/LEASE PAYMENTS - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BANK OF AMERICA JAN EXP/K. NORTHCRAFT R BANK OF AMERICA JAN EXP/S. WISNIEWSKI $417.96 00180 001-400-1201-4317 00166 $62.00 01/31/89 CITY MANAGER /CONFERENCE EXPENSE - 00180 001-400-2101-4315 00121 01/31/89 POLICE $18.93 /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R RICHARD*BARTZ 02676 001-210-0000-2110 REFUND TREE LOT DEPOSIT -- 02/16/89 $80. 93 02674 $100.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 00054 29183 $0.00 • 02/23/89 06670 29184 $0.00 02/22/89 07932 29184 $0.00 02/22/89 01760 29185 $0.00 02/22/89 J 1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN tl AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ t1 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ***************************************************************4*** R BEACH CITIES MISC CHGS/JAN R BEACH CITIES MISC CHGS/JAN R BEACH CITIES MISC CHCS/JAN R BEACH CITIES MISC CHCS/JAN R BEACH CITIES MISC CHGS/JAN R BEACH CITIES MISC CHCS/JAN R BEACH CITIES MISC CHCS/JAN OFFICE SUPPLY 89 -- OFFICE SUPPLY 89 OFFICE SUPPLY 89 OFFICE SUPPLY 89 OFFICE SUPPLY 89 OFFICE SUPPLY 89 OFFICE SUPPLY 89 02509 001-400-1202-4305 00201 -- 01/31/89 FINANCE ADMIN 02509 001-400-1206-4305 00358 --01/31/89 DATA PROCESSING 02509 001-400-2101-4305 00917 01/31/89 POLICE 02509 001-400-2201-4305 00259 01/31/89 FIRE 02509 001-400-4202-4305 00363 01/31/89 PUB WKS ADMIN 02509 001-400-4601-4305 00616 --01/31/89 COMM RESOURCES 02509 110-400-3302-4305 00533 01/31/89 PARKING ENF PAGE 0006 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $100.00 $5.19 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $24.93 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $42.74 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES -- $31.23 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $43.95 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $10.40 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES-- $3.41 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BEACH CITIES SYMPHONY ASSOC CONTRACT PMT/FY 88-89 $161.85 01717 001-400-4601-4201 00279 4250.00 02/06/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JIM*BLICKENSDERFER TECH SERV/JAN12-FEB 3.89 R JIM*BLICKENSDERFER TECH SERV/2-6-89 01303 001-400-4601-4201 00277 02/06/89 COMM RESOURCES 01303 001-400-4601-4201 00280 02/07/89 COMM RESOURCES *250.00 $462.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $56.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 $518.00 01308 001-400-1212-4188 01302 $72.15 02/14/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00149 29186 $0.00 02/23/89 00149 29186 $0.00 02/23/89 00149 29186 $0.00 02/23/89 00149 29186 $0.00 02/23/89 00149 29186 $0.00 02/23/89 00149 29186 $0.00 02/23/89 00149 29186 $0.00 02/23/89 07714 29187 $0.00 02/22/89 07713 29188 40.00 02/22/89 07715 29188 $0.00 02/22/89 00055 29189 $0.00 02/23/89 0 A i A A 0 0 IA I 0 0 0 IA 0 • L CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 14:05:52 FOR 02/28/89 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ S ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 105-400-2601-4188 00684 80.51 CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 02/14/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 110-400-3301-4188 00664 $2.05 ----- 02/14/89 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PAGE 0007 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO * CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 01308 110-400-3302-4188 00877 $2.05 02/14/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 01308 145-400-3401-4188 00622 $0.26 CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 --•---02/14/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 145-400-3402-4188 00620 $0.51 CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 ---- 02/14/89 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 145-400-3403-4188 00097 $1.01 CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 - - 02/14/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ---- R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 155-400-2102-4188 00309 $0.51 CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 - --02/14/89 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 160-400-3102-4188 00628 *0.65 CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 - 02/14/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 01293 001-400-1212-4188 01303 02/14/89 EMP BENEFITS 01293 110-400-3302-4188 00878 02/14/89 PARKING ENF 01293 145-400-3401-4188 00623 02/14/89 DIAL A RIDE .01293 145-400-3402-4188 00621 - 02/14/89 ESEA 01293 705-400-1209-4188 00071 02/14/89 LIABILITY INS 01293 705-400-1217-4188 00070 02/14/89 WORKERS COMP $79.70 $11.098.73 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $689.38 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $17.08 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *6.83 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $85.41 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS •- $170. 82 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00055 29189 $0.00 02/23/89 00055 29189 $0.00 02/23/89 00055 29189 $0.00 02/23/89 00055 29189 $0.00 02/23/89 00055 29189 $0.00 02/23/89 29189 - $0.00 02/23/89 00055 29189 - -- $0.00 02/23/89 00055 29189 $0.00 02/23/89 00056 29190 $0.00 02/23/89 00056 29190 $0.00 02/23/89 00056 29190 $0.00 02/23/89 00056 29190 $0.00 02/23/89 00056 29190 $0.00 02/23/89 00056 29190 $0.00 02/23/89 R 4 1 A A • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0008 FOR 02/28/89 DATE 02/23/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL **********•****************************** ************************* $12.068.25 R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES 02076 001-300-0000-3913 00008 $2.605.00 07169 29191 REF RECYCLE PD IN ERROR - 02/21/89 -/CITY OFFICES RECYCLING --- - $0.00 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,605.00 R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00158 001-400-3103-4201 00206 $2,711.72 90100-0037002 00004 29192 DUMP CHCS/JAN 89 37002 01/31/89 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 -02/23/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,711.72 R THE*BUILDERS BUSINESS 02682 001-210-0000-2110 02680 *175.00 67063 07162 29193 WORK GUAR REFUND 67063 02/16/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE - $0.00 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *175.00 R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY 00034 001-400-1206-4305 00357 $1.486.80 146808/144838 06906 29194 DIABLO PRINTER PAPER 44838 -• • 02/08/89 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES -- $1.158.40 02/22/89 - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1. 486.80 R CA ANIMAL CONT DIRECTORS ASSOC 02687 001-400-2401-4315 00012 $35.00 07851 29195 DUES/H. STATEN - 02/13/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /MEMBERSHIP -- - $0.00 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *35.00 R CA SEXUAL ASSAULT INVESTIG. 01439 001-400-2101-4315 00119 $20.00 07919 29196 -- DUES/K. MITCHELL - - 02/01/89 POLICE /MEMBERSHIP -- - - • -- - -- $0.00 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.00 R CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE 01065 001-400-2101-4316 00324 *72.00 07927 29197 •PUBLICATIONS/POLICE --- - 02/07/89 POLICE /TRAININQ $0.00 -- 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CANADA LIFE -CITY HEALTH-INS/MAR 89 -----• $72. 00 00046 001-400-1212-4188 01297 $646.40 00008 29198 02/14/89 EMP BENEFITS -/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ---- - -- $0.00 02/22/89 1 1 J J J t:.•.f:r i �d•.•.. rp.r:, ti. r' - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH- _. FINANCE-8FA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0009 • TIME 14:05:52 FOR 02/28/89 DATE 02/23/89 PAY VENDOR NAME • DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * i • *** VENDOR TOTAL**********•*a**a*******•**********••************************************ $646.40 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R CANADA LIFE 00239 001-400-1212-4188 01293 $2,649.30 00024 29199 - CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89- 02/14/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS- - $0.00 02/22/89 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 69 00239 105-400-2601-4188 00677 $76.74 00024 29199 02/14/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 02/22/89 R CANADA LIFE 00239 110-400-3301-4188 00658 $17.37 00024 29199 --.CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 - -- - -.02/14/89 VEH PKO DIST- ---./EMPLOYEE BENEFITS.------- $0.00 02/22/89 • CANADA LIFE 00239 110-400-3302-4188 00870 $593.07 00024 29199 CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 02/14/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 02/22/89 • • CANADA LIFE 00239 145-400-3401-4188 00616 $19.11 00024 29199 -CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89- --- -- - 02/14/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 02/22/89 I 40 .00 rr • • CANADA LIFE 00239 145-400-3402-4188 00614 $6.52 00024 29199 ! CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 02/14/89 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 02/22/89 • R CANADA LIFE 00239 145-400-3403-4188 00092 $1.95 00024 29199 - - .-CITY HEALTH INS/MAR - 02/14/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -- - $0.00 02/22/89 - • ' R CANADA LIFE 00239 155-400-2102-4188 00304 $13.45 00024 29199 r' CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 02/14/89 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 02/22/89 • • CANADA LIFE 00239 160-400-3102-4188 00621 $94.78 00024 29199 -- CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 •- 02/14/89 - SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - - $0.00 02/22/89 • R CANADA LIFE 00239 705-400-1209-4188 00067 $17.77 00024 29199 CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 02/14/89 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 02/22/89 • R CANADA LIFE 00239 705-400-1217-4188 00066 $6.31 00024 29199 CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 02/14/89 WORKERS COMP -/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ---- $0.00 02/22/89 • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3,496.37 0 r- • * • J. I.*CASE CREDIT CORP. 01147 160-400-3102-6900 00077 $748.32 00021 29200 - ----LEASE PMT/MAR 89 -- - --••• - - 02/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN - /LEASE PAYMENTS ----- -- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $748.32 - - $0.00 --• 02/23/89 -- • R CENTRAL BANK LEASING 01226 001-400-2101-6900 00391 $1,978.59 00024 29201 — ------LEASE PMT/MAR 89- --- 02/15/89 - - POLICE - -- - • /LEASE PAYMENTS- ---------- -- ----- - - *0.00 - 02/23/89 s .I r v r FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CENVAL LEASING 58 LEASE PMT/MAR 89 00875 001-400-2101-6900 02/15/89 POLICE PAGE 0010 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1,978.59 00392 $594.51 /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENTAL/JAN 89 R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENTAL/JAN 89 00153 001-400-4202-4187 00105 01/31/89 PUB WKS ADMIN 00153 01/31/89 110-400-3302-4187 00162 PARKING ENF $594.51 $469.46 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $42.00 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CNOA PUB RELATIONS/MEMBERSHIPS DUES/THOMPSON/DERKS 02684 001-400-2101-4315 02/14/89 POLICE $511.46 00120 $50.00 /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/JAN 89 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/JAN 89 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/JAN 89 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/JAN 89 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/JAN 89 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/JAN 89 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/JAN 89 71554 71554 71554 71554 71554 71554 71554 00017 001-400-1101-4304 00200 01/31/89 CITY COUNCIL 00017 001-400-1121-4304 00190 01/31/89 CITY CLERK 00017 001-400-1141-4304 00193 01/31/89 CITY TREASURER 00017 001-400-1201-4304 00208 01/31/89 CITY MANAGER 00017 001-400-1202-4304 00213 01/31/89 FINANCE ADMIN 00017 001-400-1203-4304 00209 01/31/89 PERSONNEL 00017 001-400-2101-4304 00331 01/31/89 POLICE $50.00 $0.31 /TELEPHONE $7.61 /TELEPHONE $13.56 /TELEPHONE $13.00 /TELEPHONE $34.39 /TELEPHONE $31.52 /TELEPHONE $194.77 /TELEPHONE 010000871554 010000871554 010000871554 010000871554 010000871554 010000871554 010000871554 00020 29202 $0.00 02/23/89 00002 29203 $0.00 02/23/89 00002 29203 $0.00 02/23/89 07929 29204 $0.00 02/22/89 00115 29205 $0.00 02/23/89 00115 29205 $0.00 02/23/89 00115 29205 $0.00 02/23/89 00115 29205 $0.00 02/23/89 00115 29205 $0.00 02/23/89 00115 29205 $0.00 02/23/89 00115 29205 $0.00 02/23/89 Iry 1r 4 V � f FINANCE -SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/JAN 89 71554 INC 89 ---- -- 71554 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/JAN 89 71554 INC 89 -- --71554 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/JAN 89 71554 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/JAN 89 --- 71554 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/JAN 89 71554 R COM SYSTEMS, r• -- -• -LONG DIST/JAN R COM SYSTEMS, -- —LONG LONG DIST/JAN --CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4 AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ it ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00017 001-400-2401-4304 00198 01/31/89 ANIMAL CONTROL 00017 001-400-4101-4304 00212 01/31/89 PLANNING - 00017 001-400-4201-4304 00209 01/31/89 BUILDING 00017 001-400-4202-4304 00214 01/31/89 PUB WKS ADMIN -- 00017 001-400-4601-4304 00243 01/31/89 COMM RESOURCES 00017 105-400-2601-4304 00100 01/31/89 STREET LIGHTING 00017 110-400-3302-4304 00211 01/31/89 PARKING ENF *10. 74 /TELEPHONE $19.12 /TELEPHONE -- $12.09 /TELEPHONE $64.91 /TELEPHONE —. — $36.37 /TELEPHONE $16.03 /TELEPHONE -- $45.11 - $45.11 /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************a********************* R CSAIA TRAINING REG/K. MITCHELL 02686 001-400-2101-4316 02/01/89 POLICE PAGE 0011 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO * CHK 4 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 010000871554 010000871554 010000871554 010000871554 00115 29205 40.00 02/23/89 00115 29205 $0.00 02/23/89 00115 29205 40.00 02/23/89 00115 29205 40.00 02/23/89 010000871554 00115 29205 40.00 02/23/89 010000871554 00115 29205 40.00 02/23/89 010000871554 00115 29205 40.00 02/23/89 $499.53 00323 465.00 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DALAN ENGINEERING, INC. BLDG SURVEY FIELD REPORT JA03 02683 001-400-8604-4201 00093 01/23/89 CIP 86-604 $65.00 $650.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DAPPER TIRE CO. MISC CHGS/FEB 89 R • DAPPER TIRE CO. --MISC CHCS/FEB 89------------------ R DAPPER TIRE CO. MISC CHGS/FEB 89 01390 001-400-2201-4311 00264 02/15/89 FIRE $650.00 $244.68 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 01390 001-400-2401-4311 00134 --02/15/89 •-• ANIMAL CONTROL --/AUTO 01390 001-400-4201-4311 00158 02/15/89 BUILDING $130.27 MAINTENANCE $198.94 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 07918 29206 40.00 02/22/89 JA03 07689 29207 40.00 02/22/89 00217 29208 40.00 02/23/89 00217 29208 $0.00 - 02/23/89 -- 00217 29208 40.00 02/23/89 116 wailo ■ FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION * * * R DAPPER TIRE CO. MISC CHGS/FEB 89 R DAPPER TIRE CO. MISC CHCS/FEB 89- R DAPPER TIRE CO. MISC CHGS/FEB 89 VENDOR TOTAL --CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -- --- --•--- --- ---•- --- DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 01390 001-400-4202-4311 00103 02/15/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /AUTO 01390 001-400-4601-4311 00059 COMM RESOURCES -- -...- ... -- 02/15/89 --/AUTO 01390 110-400-3302-4311 00449 02/15/89 PARKING ENF /AUTO *130.27 MAINTENANCE $198.94 MAINTENANCE $397. 88 MAINTENANCE PAGE 0012 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO # CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ******************************************************************** $1.300.98 R DATA SAFE TAPE STORAGE/DEC-JAN 89 00217 29208 $0.00 02/23/89 00217 29208 $0.00 02/23/89 00217 29208 $0.00 02/23/89 00156 001-400-1206-4201 00506 $221.25 40528/41058 00047 29209 41058 02/12/89 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/23/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $221.25 R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE & 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00093 *238.39 00014 29210 SHELTER COSTS/JAN 89 02/10/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 02/23/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***********,******************************************************** R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HWY MAINT/DEC 88 07999 R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HWY MAINT/DEC 88 07999 00267 001-400-3104-4251 00009 01/25/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00267 01/25/89 105-400-2601-4251 00074 STREET LIGHTING *238. 39 $349.99 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $350.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R THE *DEVELOPMENT MI8C CHCS/JAN 89 $699.99 00147 001-400-4601-4305 00618 $6.34 01/31/89 COMM RESOURCES. /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES- - --- - $0.00 02/23/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 107999 07691 29211 $0.00 02/22/89 107999 07691 29211 $0.00 02/22/89 00119 29212 R DISC. SOFTWARE SUPP/FY 88-89-- 4218 - $6.34 02152 001-400-1206-4201 00504 $2.625.00 4218 07847 29213 02/01/89 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT• - - $0.00 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2.625.00 R DOUBLETREE INN 01339 001-400-4101-4317 00030 $198.00 TR236 00236 ----HOTEL _. ADV/M. SCHUBACH---TR236 ----- 02/13/89 - PLANNING • /CONFERENCE EXPENSE --- -- -• $0.00 02/22/89 2214 J J ..i 777777 600 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH- - - FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0013 • TIME 14:05:52 FOR 02/28/89 DATE 02/23/89 PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 11 AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK N DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************w*s******************************************** $198.00 R DUNN-EDWARDS PAINT CO. 00161 001-400-4204-4309 01232 0157.62 140231224 07682 29215 PAINT/COMM CENTER THEATR 31224-- 02/01/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $157.62 02/22/89 • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 0157.62 R EASI FILE CORPORATION 01457 001-400-4101-5401 00004 16373.91 37391 06071 29216 MAP HOLDER/PLANNING-.- 37391 01/26/89 PLANNING -/EQUIP-LESS THAN $500 — - 0377.80 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R EASY READER 0373.91 00181 001-400-1121-4323 00049 0777.00 0268 04576 29217 PUBLIC NOTICES/JAN 89 - 0268 01/31/89 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING-- ---- $0.00 02/23/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 0777.00 R ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 02354 001-400-3103-6900 00018 01,736.78 00060 29218 LEASE PMT/MAR 89 02/15/89 ST MAINTENANCE -/LEASE PAYMENTS-- - — - $0.00 02/23/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.736. 78 R PAUL*ENGLE 02380 001-210-0000-2110 02679 0175.00 67052 07164 29219 --- WORK GUAR REFUND----------- 67052 02/16/89 -- - --/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE -•- $0.00 02/22/89- R PAUL*ENGLE WORK GUAR REFUND 02380 001-210-0000-2110 02689 01,575.00 02/16/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.750.00 07163 29219 $0.00 02/23/89 R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY 00058 105-400-2601-4309 00445 08.08 00124 29220 MISC CHGS/FEB 89 02/15/89 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -- $0.00 02/23/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $8.08 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00201 06.27 318-0200 00262 29222 DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 02/01/89 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE - $0.00 02/23/89 tal J v .Ir v M v. • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00191 02/01/89 CITY CLERK 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00123 02/01/89 CITY ATTORNEY 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00194 02/01/89 CITY TREASURER 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00209 02/01/89 CITY MANAGER 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00214 02/01/89 FINANCE ADMIN 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00210 02/01/89 PERSONNEL 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00143 02/01/89 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00111 02/01/89 BUS LICENSE 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00332 02/01/89 POLICE 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00148 02/01/89 FIRE 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00199 02/01/89 ANIMAL CONTROL 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00213 02/01/89 PLANNING 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00210 02/01/89 BUILDING 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00215 02/01/89 PUB WKS ADMIN 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00244 02/01/89 COMM RESOURCES DATA PROCESSING $15.69 /TELEPHONE $7.85 /TELEPHONE $12.55 /TELEPHONE $14.11 /TELEPHONE $52.53 /TELEPHONE $20.38 /TELEPHONE $24.30 /TELEPHONE $16.46 /TELEPHONE $347.58 /TELEPHONE $7.84 /TELEPHONE $12.54 /TELEPHONE $32.15 /TELEPHONE $65.07 /TELEPHONE $72.91 /TELEPHONE $15.68 /TELEPHONE PAGE 0014 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 J OP FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R R *** R R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DIR-IN DIAL COST/FEB 89 -0200 - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH- --- ----------- DEMAND ----------DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PRQJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00125 $7.84 02/01/89 PARKS /TELEPHONE PAGE 0015 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00212 $84.68 - 02/01/89 - PARKING ENF •/TELEPHONE - ••-- - VENDOR'TOTAL******************************************************************** CAROLE*GOODRICH WORK GUAR REFUND - - - - - 67074 CAROLE*GOODRICH WORK GUAR REFUND 67074 02696 001-210-0000-2110 02/16/89 - 02696 001-210-0000-2110 02/16/89 $816.43 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 318-0200 00262 29222 $0.00 02/23/89 02686 $1,575.00 67074 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE -- 02687 $1,575.00 67074 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R W. W. *GRAINGER SEWER FLOAT SWITCHES $3,150.00 07157 29223 $0.00 02/23/89 07158 29223 $0.00 02/23/89 01310 160-400-3102-4309 00342 $103.96 797491/797023 07681 29224 97023 02/07/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $150.00 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R GUARDIAN' DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL --CITY HEALTH INS/MAR R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 02623 001-400-1212-4188 01294 02/14/89 EMP BENEFITS 02623 105-400-2601-4188 00678 02/14/89 STREET LIGHTING 02623 110-400-3302-4188 00871 02/14/89 PARKING ENF 02623 145-400-3401-4188 00617 02/14/89 DIAL A RIDE 02623 145-400-3402-4188 00615 02/14/89 ESEA 02623 145-400-3403-4188 00093 -- 02/14/89- BUS PASS SUBSDY 02623 160-400-3102-4188 00622 89 02/14/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN $103.96 $1,533.39 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $3.44 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS-- $99.01 ENEFITS---- $99.01 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $10.30 -/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $3.47 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2.66 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - - $5.16 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00001 29225 $0.00 02/22/89 00001 29225 $0.00 02/22/89 00001 29225 $0.00 02/22/89 00001 29225 $0.00 02/22/89 00001 29225 $0.00 02/22/89 00001 29225 $0.00 02/22/89 00001 29225 $0.00 02/22/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:03:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R GUARDIAN DENTAL - - CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH-- - DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02623 703-400-1209-4188 00068 $11.10 02/14/89 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 705-400-1217-4188 00067 $22.20 02/14/89 PAGE 0016 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP WORKERS COMP ---/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS-- *** VENDOR • TOTAL *********** ** ********************** •***********************•it•µ***** R PATRICK*HARNEY 02565 001-210-0000-2110 -WORK GUAR REFUND - - 59039 02/16/89 $1•690.73 00001 29225 $0.00 02/22/89 00001 29225 $0.00 02/22/89 02678 $175.00 59039 07165 29226 -/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R HARRIS & ASSOCIATES ENG SERV/JAN 89 •- 05303 R HARRIS & ASSOCIATES ENG SERV/NOV-DEC 88 05503 R HARRIS & ASSOCIATES --ENG SERV/JAN 89 • -05203- R - - 05203 - R HARRIS & ASSOCIATES ENG SERV/JAN 89 05203 R HARRIS & ASSOCIATES ENG SERV/JAN 89 20101 02102 001-400-3104-4201 00029 02/08/89 $175.00 $513.60 8805303 08114 29227 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT - $0.00 02/23/89 02102 001-400-8176-4201 00008 02/07/89 $687.68 8805503 CIP 86-176 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 02102 115-400-8170-4201 00011 $1.051.00 8805203 02/08/89 CIP 87-170 -/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 02102 115-400-8171-4201 00019 02/08/89 02102 02/08/89 $532.00 8805203 CIP 85-171 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 08115 29227 $0.00 02/23/89 08111 29227 $0.00 02/23/89 08111 29227 $0.00 02/23/89 160-400-8406-4201 00012 $3,362.24 880720101 08107 29227 CIP 86-405 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/23/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $6.146.52 R JOHN*HARTING 02677 001-210-0000-2110 WORK GUAR REFUND -•- 43512 • 02/16/89 02685 $750.00 43512 07154 29228 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE ---- - $0.00 02/22/89 -- $750. 00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R HERMOSA BCH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC EMER REPAIR/ENGINE-11 00451 001-400-2201-4311 02/21/89 FIRE 00265 $73.71 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $73.71 R HERMOSA CAR WASH ----- • -- MISC CHGS/JAN 89 ------- 8862 00065 001-400-2101-4311 -•-01/31/89 • POLICE 00616 $64.00 05399 29229 ----- - $0.00 02/23/89 - 8862 00128 29230 -/AUTO MAINTENANCE--.-.-. -• - - - $0.00 02/23/89-- 3 3 . FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************•********************************** R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY COMP SYS MAINT/FEB 89 F1U71 R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY LASER JET PRINTER 47772 00149 001-400-1206-4201 00507 02/02/89 DATA PROCESSING 00149 001-400-4202-5402 00002 12/21/88 PUB WKS ADMIN PAGE 0017 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO 4 CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $64.00 $1.223.00 60F1U71 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00009 29231 $0.00 02/23/89 $1,578.60 7H47772 07290 29231 /EQUIP MORE THAN $500 $0.00 02/23/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GAIL*HOFFMAN WORK GUAR REFUND 59059 01680 001-210-0000-2110 02/16/89 $2,801.60 02676 $150.00 . 59059 07167 29232 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE MAINT CHCS/MAR 89 18203 $150.00 00068 001-400-1208-4201 00522 $253.00 2918203 07353 29233 02/10/89 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/23/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R RICHARD*KAMM WORK GUAR REFUND 67066 02681 001-210-0000-2110 02681 02/16/89 $253.00 $175.00 67066 07160 29234 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R KIWANIS CLUB OF HERMOSA BEACH FEB DUES/M. SCHUBACH $175.00 00380 001-400-4101-4315 00085 $40.00 02/01/89 PLANNING /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MICHAEL*LADD CONS SERV/JAN 89 016 $40.00 01978 001-400-1206-4201 00505 $1.653.48 01/29/89 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,653.48 R LT MICHAEL*LAVIN REIMBURSE TUITION 00792 001-400-2101-4316 02/07/89 POLICE 00325 $438.19 /TRAINING 06080 29235 $0.00 02/22/89 016 07849 29236 $0.00 02/22/89 07928 29237 $0.00 02/23/89 a J 0 .rr .r .r goo �d� FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 PAGE 0010 DATE 02/23/89 VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4 AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4 CHK 4 DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES REG/M. SCHUBACH TR236 00317 001-400-4101-4317 00031 02/13/89 PLANNING $438.19 $140.00 /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHGS/JAN 89 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHCS/JAN 89 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHCS/JAN 89 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHGS/JAN 89 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHGS/JAN 89 00167 001-400-2401-4309 00092 01/31/89 ANIMAL CONTROL 00167 001-400-3103-4309 00796 01/31/89 ST MAINTENANCE 00167 001-400-4204-4309 01233 01/31/89 BLDG MAINT 00167 001-400-6101-4309 00642 01/31/89 PARKS 00167 160-400-3102-4309 00343 01/31/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN $140.00 $42.60 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $26.26 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $559.97 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $100.32 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $89.46 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PAUL E.*LEWKOWICZ TECH SERV/JAN12-FEB 3.89 02619 001-400-4601-4201 00278 02/06/89 COMM RESOURCES $818.61 $330.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $330.00 R JAMES P. *LOUGH EXTRA LEGAL SERV/JAN 89 00938 001-400-1131-4201 00460 $1,153.70 01/31/89 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. MISC CHGS/JAN 89 00079 001-400-2201-4187 42454 01/31/89 FIRE $1.153.70 TR236 00236 29238 $0.00 02/22/89 00131 29239 $0.00 02/23/89 00131 29239 $0.00 02/23/89 00131 29239 $0.00 02/23/89 00131 29239 $0.00 02/23/89 00131 29239 $0.00 02/23/89 07712 29240 $0.00 02/22/89 06672 29241 $0.00 02/23/89 00124 $341.76 242455/242454 00134 29242 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $0.00 02/23/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** MS VELMA*LUMPKINS 02685 110-300-0000-3302 CITE PAYMENT REFUND 66122 02/07/89 $341.76 25757 $18.00 /COURT FINES/PARKINQ 766122 07845 29243 $0.00 02/22/89 3 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ Si ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL **********•********************************************************* R M & M CONSTRUCTION WORK GUAR REFUND 02679 001-210-0000-2110 • 67068 • 02/16/89 PAGE 0019 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO 4 CHK N • AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $18.00 02683 $150.00 67068 07156 29244 - /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE- $0.00 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK - CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 - R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK - CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK - CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK ---- •- -- - CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 - $150. 00 01859 001-400-1212-4188 01295 $808.45 02/14/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 01859 105-400-2601-4188 00679 $27.87 02/14/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 110-400-3301-4188 00659 $2.74 02/14/89 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 110-400-3302-4188 00872 $173.55 02/14/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 145-400-3401-4188 00618 $5.12 02/14/89 DIAL A RIDE ••/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 01859 145-400-3402-4188 00616 $1.73 02/14/89 EBEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 145-400-3403-4188 00094 $0.55 02/14/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 01859 155-400-2102-4188 00305 $2.29 02/14/89 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 160-400-3102-4188 00623 02/14/89 $21.93 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS- 01859 ENEFITS- 01859 705-400-1209-4188 00069 02/14/89 $2.29 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01859 705-400-1217-4188 00068 -- 02/14/89 - WORKERS COMP $4.58 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ---- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.051.10 R MANHATTAN FORD 00605 001-400-3103-4311 00434 $101.22 00041 29245 $0.00 02/22/89 00041 29245 $0.00 02/22/89 00041 29245 $0.00 02/22/89 00041 29245 $0.00 02/22/89 00041 29245 $0.00 02/22/89 00041 29245 $0.00 02/22/89 00041 29245 $0.00 02/22/89 00041 29245 $0.00 02/22/89 00041 29245 $0.00 02/22/89 00041 29245 $0.00 02/22/89 00041 29245 - $0.00 -02/22/89 --] 00237 29246 r---•-------- -MISC CHCS/FEB 89----•---• --•-- --•-•----02/15/89- ST MAINTENANCE ---/AUTO MAINTENANCE------ - $0.00 " 02/23/89 J J J J J J J FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R MANHATTAN FORD MISC CHGS/FEB 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VNO # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00605 001-400-3104-4311 00017 02/15/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY $82.58 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MANTEK GALVANIZED COMPOUND 79804 R MANTEK GALVANIZED COMPOUND 79804 01943 001-400-4204-4309 01231 01/31/89 BLDG MAINT 01943 105-400-2601-4309 00442 01/31/89 STREET LIGHTING PAGE 0020 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $183.80 00237 29246 $0.00 02/23/89 $106.29 30-79804 07641 29247 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $101.28 02/22/89 $106.29 30-79804 07641 29247 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $101.28 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************a***************************** R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES. INC. LEASE PMT/MAR 89 R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES. INC. LEASE PMT/MAR 89 02272 02/15/89 02272 02/15/89 001-400-2101-6900 00389 POLICE 001-400-2101-6900 00390 POLICE $212.58 $1.072.55 /LEASE PAYMENTS $1.233.52 /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ALANA*MASTRIAN-HANDMAN PER DIEM/REIMB DEPOSITS TR232 R ALANA*MASTRIAN-HANDMAN REG ADV/PD BY EMPLOYEE TR232 00219 001-400-4601-4317 00072 02/16/89 COMM RESOURCES 00219 001-400-4601-4317 00074 02/16/89 COMM RESOURCES $2.306.07 00059 29248 $0.00 02/23/89 00056 29248 $0.00 02/23/89 $440.84 TR232 00232 29249 /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 02/23/89 $95.00 TR232 00232 29249 /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 02/23/89 $535.84 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MCI MAIL ELEC MAIL CHG/JAN 89 02153 001-400-1206-4304 00144 $110.00 74736 02/10/89 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MICRO PUBLICATION SYSTEMS MISC CHCS/FEB 89 44085 02457 02/15/89 $110.00 07974736 00058 29250 $0.00 02/23/89 001-400-4201-4201 00132 $358.16 44085 00261 29251 BUILDING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/23/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MONARCH BROOM MISC CHGS/FEB 89 $358.16 00084 001-400-3103-4309 00797 $1.256.70 02/15/89 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00238 29252 $0.00 02/23/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 PAGE 0021 DATE 02/23/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MONOGRAMS/LOGO'S CRS() GRD WINDDREAKERS 02576 155-400-2102-4187 00065 5849. 02/16/89 CROSSING GUARD R MONOGRAMS/LOGO'S CROSSING GUARD WINDBREAK 5848 02576 155-400-2102-4187 00066 02/16/89 CROSSING GUARD $1.256.70 $169.60 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $224.29 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MOTOROLA INC. NEW RADIOS/GS-PD DISPATC 38853 00207 02/09/89 $393.89 5849 06945 29253 $169.60 02/22/89 5848 06944 29253 $224.29 02/23/89 110-400-3302-5402 00013 115.959.77 349418/338853 06868 29254 PARKING ENF /EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 $15.959.77 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MYERS STEVENS & COMPANY CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 $15.959.77 00091 001-400-1212-4188 01296 $805.80 02/14/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R N.C.E. REBUILD LIFE PAK BATTS 02090 001-400-2201-4309 00633 5441 01/30/89 FIRE $805.80 00013 29255 $0.00 02/22/89 $236.47 5441 05389 29256 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $220.46 02/23/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC DUES/S. WISNIEWSKI 12170 02490 001-400-2201-4315 00046 01/03/89 FIRE $236.47 $75.75 /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DENCY*NELSON WORK GUAR REFUND 02680 001-210-0000-2110 67032 02/16/89 $75.75 M412170 05398 29257 $0.00 02/23/89 02682 $150.00 67032 07159 29258 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R KEVIN B.*NORTHCRAFT REIMD TRAVEL EXPENSE $150.00 02064 001-400-1201-4317 00167 $54.94 02/21/89 CITY MANAGER /CONFERENCE EXPENSE 06671 29259 $0.00 02/23/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R OLESON'S ELECTRONICS • THEATRE LIGHTING SUPPLY 14486 PAGE 0022 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $54.94 01936 001-400-4601-4305 00615 $33.95 02/01/89 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 00235 001-400-1212-4188 01301 02/14/89 EMP BENEFITS 00235 105-400-2601-4188 00683 02/14/89 STREET LIGHTING 00235 110-400-3301-4188 00663 02/14/89 VEH PKG DIST 00235 110-400-3302-4188 00876 02/14/89 PARKING ENF 00235 145-400-3401-4188 00621 02/14/89 DIAL A RIDE 00235 145-400-3402-4188 00619 02/14/89 ESEA 00235 02/14/89 155-400-2102-4188 00308 CROSSING GUARD 00235 160-400-3102-4188 00627 02/14/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN $33.95 $1,147.42 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $52.71 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $4.32 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $339.67 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.58 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.29 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $5.93 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $43.09 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMP HOOKUP/FEB 89 00321 001-400-2101-4304 02/01/89 POLICE $1,594.01 00333 $155.21 /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 $155.21 00575 001-400-1212-4188 01300 $12.909.21 02/14/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 214486 07725 29260 $0.00 02/23/89 00019 29261 $0.00 02/22/89 00019 29261 $0.00 02/22/89 00019 29261 $0.00 02/22/89 00019 29261 $0.00 02/22/89 00019 29261 $0.00 02/22/89 00019 29261 $0.00 02/22/89 00019 29261 $0.00 02/22/89 00019 29261 $0.00 02/22/89 00036 29262 $0.00 02/23/89 00016 29263 $0.00 02/22/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION * * * R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 INS/MAR 89 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 VENDOR TOTAL R KIM*PAGE DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 69853 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00575 105-400-2601-4188 00682 02/14/89 STREET LIGHTING 00575 110-400-3301-4188 00662 02/14/89 VEH PKG DIST 00575 110-400-3302-4188 00875 02/14/89 PARKING ENF 00575 145-400-3401-4188 00620 02/14/89 DIAL A RIDE 00575 145-400-3402-4188 00618 02/14/89 ESEA 00575 145-400-3403-4188 00096 02/14/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY 00575 155-400-2102-4188 00307 02/14/89 CROSSING GUARD 00575 160-400-3102-4188 00626 02/14/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN 02689 001-210-0000-2110 02/06/89 $495.56 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $30.88 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2.030.15 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $7.21 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2.06 /EMPLOYEE BENEFIT8 $4.12 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $45.37 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $355.00 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PAGE 0023 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $15,879.56 00016 29263 $0.00 02/22/89 00016 29263 $0.00 02/22/89 00016 29263 $0.00 02/22/89 00016 29263 $0.00 02/22/89 00016 29263 $0.00 02/22/89 00016 29263 $0.00 02/22/89 00016 29263 $0.00 02/22/89 00016 29263 $0.00 02/22/89 02675 $100.00 69853 07153 29264 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PHENIX TECHNOLOGY, INC. FIRE FLOW STUDY SERVICES 2845 $100. 00 02690 180-400-2202-4201 00003 $2,400.00 2845 05397 29265 02/13/89 HYDRANT UPGRADE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/22/89 $2.400.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP INS/MARCH 89 R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP INS/MARCH 89 00585 001-400-1212-4188 01299 02/14/89 EMP BENEFITS 00585 105-400-2601-4188 00681 02/14/89 STREET LIGHTING $72.25 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.50 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00038 29266 $0.00 02/22/89 00038 29266 $0.00 02/22/89 i J J J -J J -9 J J J 1#/ FINANCE-SFA340 TINE 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP INS/MARCH 89 R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP INS/MARCH 89 R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP INS/MARCH 89 R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP INS/MARCH 89 R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP INS/MARCH 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00585 110-400-3301-4188 00661 02/14/89 $0.50 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00585 110-400-3302-4188 00874 02/14/89 $4.25 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00585 160-400-3102-4188 00625 02/14/89 $1.00 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00585 705-400-1209-4188 00070 02/14/89 $1.25 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00585 705-400-1217-4188 00069 02/14/89 $1.25 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PRINTMASTERS COPIES/PLANNING PAGE 0024 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $131.00 00350 001-400-4101-4305 00273 $92.87 19366 08/24/88 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R RADIO SHACK MISC CHCS/FEB 89 R RADIO SHACK MISC CHCS/FEB 89 R RADIO SHACK MISC CHCS/FEB 89 01429 001-400-1101-4305 00225 02/15/89 $92.87 $189.39 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 01429 001-400-4204-4309 01235 02/15/89 BLDG MAINT 01429 105-400-2601-4309 00444 02/15/89 $35.08 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 515. 08 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO DEVELOP ROBBERY PICTURES H5020 00173 001-400-2101-4305 00916 02/08/89 POLICE $239.55 $141.73 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R RED LION MOTOR INN HOTEL ADV/A. MASTRIAN $141.73 01437 001-400-4601-4317 00073 $248.00 TR232 02/16/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONFERENCE EXPENSE 00038 29266 $0.00 02/22/89 00038 29266 $0.00 02/22/89 00038 29266 $0.00 02/22/89 00038 29266 $0.00 02/22/89 00038 29266 $0.00 02/22/89 19366 06074 29267 $0.00 02/22/89 00243 29268 $0.00 02/23/89 00243 29268 $0.00 02/23/89 00243 29268 $0.00 02/23/89 H5020 07931 29269 $0.00 02/22/89 TR232 00232 29270 $0.00 02/23/89 7 FINANCE-SFA34O TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH-------- DEMAND EACH----------DEMAND LIST PAGE 0025 FOR 02/28/89 DATE 02/23/89 VNO * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN #. AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 1. *** VENDOR TOTAL *****r#************air****r*a**********gra************************** $248.00 R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES • 01578 001-400-4202-4201 00238 $775.00 89117 07699 29271 -ENG. SERV/JAN 89 - ---89117- •- 02/01/89 - PUB WKS ADMIN -/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT • $0.00 02/22/89 *** VENDOR-TOTAL******************************************************************** $775.00 R MONICA*RYAN 02688 001-300-0000-3801 01527 $40.00 71607 07509 29272 •- - - --REFUND RBR REPORT- - - 71607 -- - 02/08/89 -/RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION - - $0.00 -02/22/89 , *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $40.00 R SUSAN*SAXE-CLIFFORD,PH D 00839 001-400-1203-4320 00234 $275.00 9-0130-3 07088 29273 PSYCH EVAL/S. RODRIGUEZ 130-3 01/30/89 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS $0.00 02/22/89 ▪ *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $275.00 R SEPULVEDA BLDG. SUPPLY 02655 105-400-8202-4201 00026 $1,995.30 194870 07663 29274 BONA TUBES/STREET-LIGHTS 94870 02/06/89 CIP 85-202 -/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $1,904.47- 02/23/89 • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.995.30 R SERVCO SERVICE COMPANY 02658 001-400-3104-4309 00171 $88.92 71426 07660 29275 STREET MARKERS/PAINT 71426 02/14/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - $99.73 02/23/89 ▪ *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $88.92 R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00031 $1,426.00 45888 07834 29276 BUS PASS SALES/DEC 88 45888- --- 01/31/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT - $0.00 02/22/89 R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00032 $1.444.00 46082 07842 29276 BUS PASS SALES/JAN 89 46082 01/25/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 02/22/89 • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,870.00 } • • R SO -CAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY 02196 001-400-4204-4321 00421 $2.056.94 100029/48318 07300 29277 LIGHT FIXTURES 48318 01/17/89 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT $2.056.94 02/23/89 I J J J J ..r FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $ AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOURISSEAU SECURITY SYS, INC. BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION 12/13 02075 001-400-2101-4201 02/14/89 POLICE PAGE 0026 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # . AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $2.056.94 00352 $330.00 1210/11/12/13 07930 29278 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/22/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITE COURT BAIL 00400 110-300-0000-3302 02/16/89 $330.00 25758 $102.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHCS/JAN 89 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHGS/JAN 89 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHCS/JAN 89 *102.00 00018 001-400-2201-4309 00634 $20.77 01/31/89 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00018 001-400-3103-4309 00795 $11.25 01/31/89 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00018 105-400-2601-4309 00443 $11.25 01/31/89 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLS/JAN 89 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLS/JAN 89 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLS/JAN 89 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLS/JAN 89 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLS/JAN 89 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLS/JAN 89 *43.27 00159 001-400-3101-4303 00028 $133.02 01/31/89 MEDIANS /UTILITIES 00159 001-400-3104-4303 00014 $521.90 01/31/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /UTILITIES 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00287 $6,377.79 01/31/89 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00237 $1,336.12 01/31/89 PARKS /UTILITIES 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00173 $355.96 01/31/89 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00096 $63.13 01/31/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /UTILITIES 07854 29279 $0.00 02/23/89 00151 29280 $0.00 02/23/89 00151 29280 $0.00 02/23/89 00151 29280 $0.00 02/23/89 00152 29281 $0.00 02/23/89 00152 29281 $0.00 02/23/89 00152 29281 $0.00 02/23/89 00152 29281 $0.00 02/23/89 00152 29281 $0.00 02/23/89 00152 29281 $0.00 02/23/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION #** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ST LITE BILLS/JAN 89 PAGE 0027 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $8.787.92 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00174 $14.852.84 01/31/89 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL************f#*******************************#********************** R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP WATER COOLER RENT/JAN 89 44476 $14.852.84 00146 001-400-4601-4305 00619 $36.00 01/31/89 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R TAI -SU YU RICHFIELD BUILDERS WORK GUAR REFUND 26391 02694 001-210-0000-2110 02/16/89 $36.00 00013 ' 29282 $0.00 02/23/89 144476 00033 29283 $0.00 02/23/89 02690 $7.775.00 26391 07168 29284 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/23/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R TICOR TITLE INS CO. OF CALIF. TITLE GUARANTEE/21ST ST 35996 02613 001-210-0000-2110 01/21/89 $7.775.00 02691 $900.00 8535996 07616 29285 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/23/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY MISC CHGS/FEB 89 $900.00 00124 001-400-6101-4309 00643 $169.33 02/15/89 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R TORRANCE NISSAN AUTO RENTAL/JAN-FEB 89 $169.33 00125 170-400-2103-4201 00001 $1.200.00 02/10/89 SPEC INVESTGTNS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 tor $1. 200. 00 00240 001-400-1212-4188 01292 $165.82 02/14/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 105-400-2601-4188 00676 $1.52 02/14/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00257 29286 $0.00 02/23/89 00060 29287 $0.00 02/23/89 00029 29288 $0.00 02/22/89 00029 29288 $0.00 02/22/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL --CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89- -• R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL --CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 - - R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00240 110-400-3301-4188 00657 02/14/89 VEH PKG DIST 00240 110-400-3302-4188 00869 - 02/14/89 PARKING ENF 00240 145-400-3401-4188 00615 02/14/89 DIAL A RIDE 00240 145-400-3402-4188 00613 02/14/89 ESEA 00240 155-400-2102-4188 00303 02/14/89 CROSSING GUARD 00240 160-400-3102-4188 00620 02/14/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN $7.05 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $10.58 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.94 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PAGE 0028 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO 4 CHK S AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *0.38 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ---- $1.76 76 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 83.04 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL*******•n*a•***************************•x•x•**********x•*x•**•x*******•n**+r** $191.09 R UNIFORCE CORPORATION FUEL SYS TRAINING EXP 01720 001-400-8601-4316 00001 81.906.13 81002 11/04/88 CIP 86-601 -/TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 02355 02/14/89 02355 02/14/89 02355 02/14/89 02355 02/14/89 02355 02/14/89 02355 02/14/89 001-400-1212-4188 01298 EMP BENEFITS 105-400-2601-4188 00680 STREET LIGHTING 110-400-3301-4188 00660 VEH PKG DIST 110-400-3302-4188 00873 PARKING ENF 145-400-3401-4188 00619 DIAL A RIDE -- 145-400-3402-4188 00617 ESEA 00029 29288 $0.00 02/22/89 00029 29288 80.00 02/22/89 00029 29288 $0.00 02/22/89 00029 29288 80.00 02/22/89 00029 29288 $0.00 02/22/89 00029 29288 80.00 02/22/89 881101/881002 07676 29289 $0.00 02/22/89 81, 906. 13 $714.26 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $24.68 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.80 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - $134.73 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.99 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS- ------- 80. 32 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00028 29290 80.00 02/22/89 00028 29290 80.00 02/22/89 00028 29290 80.00 02/22/89 00028 29290 $0.00 02/22/89 00028 29290 $0.00 02/22/89- 00028 2/22/89- 00028 29290 $0.00 02/22/89 10 41. - I - _.-e..w-.+r�wa..^+..,d'�,•p^'.y".4s�;'d�k`s� ....... -:�v; ....rr�.r,�.�.,,K. FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 14:03:32 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. --CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 - - R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 VND * DATE INVC 02335 02/14/89 -CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -- DEMAND LIST FOR 02/28/89 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 145-400-3403-4188 00095 BUS PASS SUDSDY 02355 155-400-2102-4188 00306 02/14/89 - CROSSING GUARD 02355 160-400-3102-4188 00624 02/14/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN $0.49 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2.05 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $19.20 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R UNITED AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAR 89 • PAGE 0029 DATE 02/23/89 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $898.52 02697 001-400-1212-4188 01291 $84.00 02/14/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $84.00 R WESSEL MECHANICAL SERVICES SEWER CONTROL PANEL REP 97 -IN *** VENDOR TOTAL 00028 29290 $0.00 02/22/89 00028 29290 40.00 02/22/89 00028 29290 $0.00 02/22/89 00065 29291 $0.00 02/22/89 02656 160-400-3102-4309 00341 $210.00 0890797 -IN 07677 02/01/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $300.00 $210.00 ******************************************************************** R WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS RIVETS/STOP SIGNS 47311 00131 001-400-3104-4309 00170 12/28/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY 29292 02/22/89 $319.85 147311 07628 29293 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $315.24 02/22/89 • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SALLY A. *WHITE SEC SERV/2-7-99 00140 001-400-4102-4201 00199 02/14/89 PLANNING COMM $319.85 $204.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R XEROX CORPORATION EXCESS METER USE/JAN 89 99875 R XEROX CORPORATION - • . LEASE PMT/FEB 89 35563 - 00135 001-400-1208-4201 00523 02/06/89 GEN APPROP 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00139 02/02/89 GEN APPROP $204.00 06081 29294 $0.00 02/22/89 $6.77 19699875 07352 29295 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/23/89 $943.72 521235563 00048 29295 /LEASE PAYMENTS --- - -- .. - - - $0.00 -- 02/23/89 -- - 1 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $950.49 R ZUMAR INDUSTRIES 01206 001-400-3104-4309 00172 $2.143.65 8677 07637 29296 - --- ---HIGH INTENSITY TAPE - ---- - 8677---------- 01/26/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY ---./MAINTENANCE MATERIALS----- -- $2.143.65 02/23/89 - - J J FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:05:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - DEMAND LIST PAGE 0030 FOR 02/28/89 DATE 02/23/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $ AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4 CHK DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2.143.65 *** PAY CODE TOTAL********************.********************************************** $158.879.18 *** TOTAL WARRANTS****************************************************************** $740.661.22 a 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PA �''I1ES / INCLUSIVE OF THE WARR T REGISTER FORS[ ARE ACCURATE AND F NDS AR- AVA LLA^LE F9.t F':�YMENT THEREOF: • BY f��/ FINANCE A I�IINISTRAIOOR DATE i r • 1 CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - JANUARY 1989 FUND NUMBER 001 105 110 115 120 125 126 127 130 140 145 150 155 160 170 180 705 GENERAL 1/1/89 ACCOUNT BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENTS WARRANTS ADJUSTMENTS 1/31/89 BALANCE GENERAL LIGHTING DISTRICT PARKING STATE GAS TAX COUNTY GAS TAX PARK REC.FAC.TAX RAILROAD RT.OF WAY 6% UTILITY USERS TAX REVENUE SHARING CDBG PROPOSITION A FUND GRANT FUND CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT SEWER MAINTENANCE POLICE ASSET SEIZURE FIRE PROTECTION FUND SELF INSURANCE FUND $3,074,514.20 1,269,618.61 143,736.82 345,382.58 35,091.64 559,690.47 547,181.64 54,013.43 10,635.06 -0- 254,749.83 71,192.69 26,596.65 1,290,098.42 214,844.60 137,824.96 783,094.49 $8,818,266.09 $ 686,373.97 $178,852.25 $ 781,336.68 37,022.12 10,966.06 55,210.37 169,416.64 1,632.92 79,293.56 23,146.89 9,602.23 8,518.92 - 0- 303.00 -0- 16,335.00 4,832.69 4,744.58 58,694.48 4,724.68 -0- 88,041.72 466.38 -0- -0- 91.83 -0- - 0- -0- -0- 22,267.00 3,452.29 3,889.29 - 0- 5,246.72 -0- 7,483.69 229.65 3,814.28 1,144.55 77,811.61 25,305.65 1,330.23 1,855.09 474.00 9,108.50 5,355.06 -0- - 0- 22,952.99 64,944.46 $1,120,364.79 $328,375.45 $1,027,531.79 $ 95,634.52 4,782.11 120,762.10 6,355.00 -0- - 0- -0- 86,829.00 3,250.00 - 0- -0- -0- 1,306.33 2,048.35 5,525.00 -0- .18 $326,492.59 $3,062,769.22 1,257,614.31 114,730.72 363,257.78 35,394.64 576,113.58 610,600.80 55,692.53 7,476.89 -0- 276,579.83 76,439.41 29,189.38 1,341,700.58 212,030.92 152,288.52 741,102.84 $8,912,981.95 TRUST ACCOUNTS BALANCE RECEIVED PAID BALANCE STATEMENT BALANCE PAYROLL $8,704,441.73 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $366,618.60 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE $ 3,007.75 $491,521.14 $491,849.09 $ 2,679.80 GENERAL $ 274,481.11 PAYROLL 4,352.57 278,833.68 67,613.66 211,220.02 INACTIVE DEPOSIT 8,704,441.73 BALANCE 8,915,661.75 OUTSTANDING CHECKS • NLy,.GGA GARY /BRUTSCH, CITY TR ASURER FEBRUARY 24, 1989 ld February 21, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 28, 1989 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 84-4738 TO REFLECT A CHANGE IN THE BAIL SCHEDULE PERTAINING TO ANIMALS AND FOWL, SECTION 4-2 HBMC AND, TO REQUEST THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT TO ENACT THE ATTACHED BAIL AMOUNT FOR VIOLATIONS OF SAID SECTION. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution amending Resolution No. 84-4738 to reflect a change in the Bail Schedule pertaining to Animals and Fowl, Section 4-2 HBMC and, to request the Presiding Judge of the South Bay Municipal Court to enact the attached Bail amount for violations of said section. BACKGROUND: At your regularly scheduled meeting of July 24th, Resolution No. 84-4738 was adopted requesting the Presiding Judge of the South Bay Municipal Court to enact a new bail schedule for misdemeanors and infractions of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. That Resolution was, at your regularly scheduled meeting of January 22, 1985, amended by Resolution No. 85-4788, by reducing the fines for violations of some of the sections of Chapter. 4, Animals and Fowl. Inadvertently, Section 4-2, HBMC, was omitted from both resolutions, and no bail amount has been attached for violations of this section. ANALYSIS: Adoption of this resolution is merely a housekeeping measure to include Section 4-2 of Chapter 4, HBMC in the Bail Schedule enacted by the South Bay Municipal Court after adoption by the City Council. Inclusion of this section in the Bail Schedule for Chapter 4, Animals and Fowl, permits the collection of bail for violations of Section 4-2, whereas, violations are not now subject to assessment of any fine, absent the presence of this section in the Bail Schedule. The absence of any bail amount enacted by the Court, makes enforcement of this section impossible. Whereas, enforcement of all sections of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is in the best interest of the community, adoption of this resolution is equally in the best interest of the community. 1 ATERNATIVES: 1. Take no action, preventing enforcement. 2. Adopt a greater/lesser bail amount. 3. Delete Section 4-2 HBMC from the code, thereby removing the necessity of enforcement. CONCUR: 441110 Joa.j`"oon, 'irector General Services Dept. Respectfully submitted, Joan //lfoon, Director by G`G 4).it: Lce2r---- Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Not here to sign. Viki Copeland, Finance Administrator CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BAIL SCHEDULE VIOLATION CLASS TITLE OLD NEW ANIMALS AND FOWL 4-2 I Household pets $-0- $25. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 84-4738 TO REFLECT A CHANGE IN THE BAIL SCHEDULE PERTAINING TO ANIMALS AND FOWL AND, TO REQUEST THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT TO ENACT THE ATTACHED BAIL AMOUNT FOR SAID VIOLATION. WHEREAS, the City Council on January 22, 1985, passed, approved, and adopted Resolution No. 85-4788 amending Resolution 84-4738 to reflect a change in the bail schedule pertaining to animals and fowl; WHEREAS, Chapter 4, "Animals and Fowl", Section 4-2, "Household Pets" of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, was inadvertently omitted from Resolution No. 85-4788, and was not therefor assigned a bail amount for violations; WHEREAS, enforcement of all regulations of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is in the best interest of the community; WHEREAS, violations of Section 4-2 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, supra, were intended to be punishable by a fine assessed upon the violator; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the city requests the Presiding Judge of the South Bay Municipal Court to enact the attached recommended bail of $25.00 for each violation of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Section 4-2, Animals and Fowl. SECTION 2. immediately. That this Resolution shall take effect 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original Resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this th day of February, 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: Kathleen Midstokke, City PPROVED AS FORM: 7) L'u,Q mes P. L u J g BACKGROUND MATER/Ac • ' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 84-4738 TO REFLECT A CHANGE IN THE BAIL SCHEDULE PERTAINING TO ANIMAL AND FOWL AND, TO REQUEST THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT TO ENACT THE ATTACHED BAIL SCHEDULE FOR SAID VIOLATIONS. WHEREAS, the City Council has reconsidered its action of July 24, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined the previous bail schedule pertaining to Animal and Fowl violations to be ex- cessive in certain cases: • NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL•OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City requests'the Presiding Judge of the South Bay Municipal Court to enact the attached recommended bail schedule for violations of Section 4, Animals and Fowl, of*the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. SECTION 2. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately.' SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original Resolutions of said City; and shall make'a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of ATTEST: Kathleen Reviczky, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: James Lough, City Attorney PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR or the City of Hermosa Beach CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BAIL SCHEDULE VIOLATION CLASS TITLE OLD NEW ANIMALS & FOWL 4-3 I Keeping nonhousehold pets w/o permit 100. 25. 4-5 M Nonhousehold pets Endangering Persons' 250. 250. 4-6 M Nonhousehold Animals on Public Property 250. 250. 4-6.1(1) I Animal Nuisances-Public/Private Property 100. 25. 4-6.1(2) I Animal Noises -Disturbing 100. 25'. 4-8 I Dogs at Large 65. 25. 4-8.1 I Vicious Dogs at Large 100. 100.' 4-10 I Dog License Required 65. 25.. 4-31 M Interferring with Animal Control Officer 100. 250. TO atitgrnattit Z24 ft.)4° ‘.*4, July 18, 1984 _ , sa 1 -4/ - Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of July 24, 1984 • Resolution of the City .Council Requesting the Presiding Judge of the South Bay Municipal Court to Enact the Attached Bail/Fine Schedule, for Misdemeanor and Infraction Violations of the Municipal Code • RECOMMENDATION: ' It 3s recommended that City .Council pass the attached Resolution requesting the Presiding Judge of the South Bay Municipal Court to enact the bail/fine schedule attached thereto, for violations of misdemeanors and infractions of the Municipal Code of the City of Hermosa Beach. BACKGROUND: The South Bay Municipal Court has asked that the City provide it with a proposed schedule of bails for the Court to use as a guideline in dealing with violations (misdemeanors and infractions) of the Municipal Code of the City of Hermosa Beach. • In March, 1982, we requested an upgrading of bail schedules for violations. We leatned late in 1983 the bail/fine schedules were never changed. After a lengthy inquiry, we learned that the_Court had received our . request but had failed to act. A clerk assumed all violations were infractions and therefore our "Misdemeanor Bail Schedule" did not apply. The clerk's main error was in NOT contacting me, or my staff, for clarification. Section 1-7 of the Code made all violations a misdemeanor. On the other hand, State law had changed. The Code had not been updated '''since 1963 and did not clearly define misdemeanors and infractions. The revisions of ordinances, approved by City Council tonight, updates the Code to conform to current (January 1, 1984) revisions of the Government Code of the State of California. ANALYSIS: Approval and adoption of the eight (8) ordinances which bring the Code into conformity with State law; and the passage of this Resolution, with proposed bail/fine schedule for misdemeanors and infractions violations of the Code, will finally resolve the • problem and update a 10 year old schedule. Revenues generated by this upgrading will more than double, based on a conservative analysis of bail/fine/forfeiture expectations. • CONCUR: Res il F an Beeso , hief of Police tfullybmitted, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 •16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 84-4738 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT TO ENACT THE ATTACHED BAIL SCHEDULE FOR MISDE- MEANOR AND INFRACTION VIOLATIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, the South Bay Municipal Court has asked that the City provide it with a proposed schedule of bails for the Court to use as a guideline in dealing with violations (misdemeanors and infractions) of the Municipal Code of the City of Hermosa Beach; and WHEREAS, the City Council has been made aware of the provisions Sections 36900, et. seq., of (the) Government Code of the State of California, i.e., 36901; and WHEREAS, the bail schedule upgraded February 19, 1974; and WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Hermosa Beach was last of the City of Hermosa Beach, at their regular meeting of July 24, 1984, passed, approved and adopted several Ordinances to• update the Municipal Code of the City of Hermosa Beach, clearly defining Misdemeanor and Infraction violations of said Code; and WHEREAS, the updating of these ordinances comply with all applicable sections of law: NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City requests the Presiding Judge of the South Bay Municipal Court to enact the attached recommended bail schedule for misdemeanor and infraction violations of the Municipal Code of the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 2. That the Court consider this Resolution as separate and distinct from the reasonable bail request for STREET AND PARKING LOT VIOLATIONS, approved by City Council on July 10, 1984, and considered by the Court for increased bail. SECTION 3. That the provisions of Chapter 19 of the Municipal Code ////////////////////////////////// 1 1 2 3 4' 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 of the City of Hermosa Beach, and the bail therefor, is separable from and not included in this request for upgrading. SECTION 4. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original Resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 24th day of July 1984. s of the City Council and he City 'of Hermosa Beach PRES DENT Mayor of ATTEST: -27. . 28 Kathleen Reviczky, City Cl APPROV D AS TO FORM: tJ,t Gf.GeGr CT /n Charles J. Post, City Attorney 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 •25 26 27 28 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY -OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ) I, KATHLEEN REVICZKY, City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, do hereby, certify that the foregoing. Resolution No. 84-4738 was duly and regularly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach at a regular meeting of said Council held at the regular meeting place thereof on the 24th day of July 1984. The vote was as follows: AYES: Barks, Cioff1, DeBellis, Wood and Mayor Brutsch NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None DATED: July 25, 1984 Kathleen Revicz. , Cit • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BAIL SCHEDULE VIOLATION CLASS. 1-7.7 3-1 3-2 3-3.1 3-3.2 3-3.6 4-3 4-5 4-6 4-6.1(1) 4-6.1(2) 4-8 4-8.1 4-10 4-31 5-4(a) 5-4(b) 5-5 5-6(a) 5-6(b) 5-6(c) 5-7 5-8(a) 5-8(b) 5-9 5-10(a) 5-10(b) 5-11(a) 5-11(b) TITLE OLD ' NEW M VIOLATING WRITTEN PROMISE TO APPEAR V 300. .ADVERTISING I Distributing Handbills, Advertising I Injuring, Defacing Signs I Advertising Bench, Unlawful Installation I Advert. Bench, Installing w/o Permit . I Advert. Bench, Not in Compliance ANIMALS & FOWL I Keeping nonhousehold Pets w/o Permit 25. 100. M Nonhousehold Pets Endangering Persons 25. 250. M Nonhousehold Animals on Public Property 25. 250. I Animal Nuisances - Public/Private Propertry 25. 100. I Animal Noises - Disturbing 25. 100. I . Dogs at Large 25. ' . 65. I Vicious Dogs at Large 25. 100. I Dog License Required 25. 65. M Interferring with Animal Control Officer 25. 250. BEACH, BOATS & MUNICIPAL PIER I Possession, etc., Alcohol on Beach 25. 100. I Possession, etc., Alcohol on The Strand 25. 100. I Animals on the Beach 25. _ 100. I Balls, etc., on Beach not Permitted 25. 50. I Throwing Sand, etc., on Beach/The Strand 25. 50. I Throwing Missiles on The Strand 25. 50. I Swimming more than 200 yards from Shore 25. 50. I Damaging Beach Equipment of Others 25. 50. I Failure to Remove Beach Equip. in Nightime 25. 50. I Boating within 300 yards of Shoreline 25. 50. I Changing Clothes in Public Toilet on Beach 25. 50. - I Changing Clothes in Vehicle Prohibited 25. 50. . I Disturbing Beach by Loud, Unusual Noise 25. 50: I Disturbing Beach/Strand with Horn/Device 25. 50. 25. 100. 25. 100. 25. 100. 25. 100. • 25. 100. 1 VIOLATION CLASS. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BAIL SCHEDULE TITLE OLD NEW • 5-11(c) I Disturbing Beach by Vulgar Language 25. 50. 5-12 I Fires Prohibited on Beach 25. 50. 5-13(a) M Possession of ILLEGAL Fireworks on Beach 25. 250. 5-13(b) I Possession Safe & Sane Fireworks Prohibited 25. 100. 5-14(a) I Unsafe use of Fishing Tackle on Beach/Strand 25. 50. 5-14(b) I Failure to Obey Police/Lifeguard by Fisherman 25. 100. 5-15 I Damaging Beach/Strand Flora • 25. 100. 5-16 I Glass, etc., Creating Hazard on Beach/Strand 25. 100. 5-17(a) M Glass, Rubbish, etc; Deposit in Container 25. 250. 5-17(b) M Glass, Rubbish, etc.; Parent Causing Minor to Discard Unlawfully 25. 250. . 5-17(c) • M Dumping Accumulated Trash on Beach/Strand 25. 500. 5-21 ' M Failure to Obey Police/Lifeguards 25. 250. 5-22 M Tampering with Lifesaving Apparatus 25. 500. 5-24 I Motorized Bicycles/Vehicles on Beach/Strand 25. 100. 5-24.5 I Wheeled, Prohibited Vehicles do Conveyances 25. 100. 5-24.5(b) I Wheeled Device Failing to Yield to Pedestrians 25. 50. 5-24.5(c) I Group Riding; More than 2 side by side 25. 50. 5-24.5(d) I Racing, Trick Riding Prohibited 25. 50. 5-24.5(e) I Dangerous, Excessive Speed 25. 50. 5-24.5(f) I Parking Wheeled Vehicle, Obstructing Path 25. 50. 5-25 I Overnight Camping on Beach/Strand Prohibited 25. 50. 5-26(a) M Pollution of Water with Oil 25. 500. 5-26(b) M Pollution - Indirect Oil 25. 250. 5-26(c) M Pollution - Discharging Bilge Water 25. 250. 5-26(d) M Pollution - Dead Animal, Other 25. 250. 5-28 I Removing Sand Prohibited 25. 100. 5-29 M Discharging Weapons on Beach/Strand 25. 500. 5-30 I False Signals of Danger 25. 100. 5-31 I Solicitation on Beach/Strand 25. 100. 5-32(a) I Defacing/Damaging Structures, Beach/Strand 25. 100. 5-32(b)• I Marking/Writing/Painting, Beach/Strand 25. 100. 5-32(c) I Breaking/Damaging Lights/Poles 25. 100. 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BAIL SCHEDULE VIOLATION CLASS. TITLE OLD NEW 5-34 I Tents Prohibited on Beach 25. 100. (MUNICIPAL PIER) 5-36 I Changing Clothes in Pier Washroom 25. 100. 5-37 I -Selling without Permit on Pier 25. 100. 5-38 I Throwing Bait, Litter on Pier 25. 100. 5-39 I Casting Lines from Pier 25. 100. 5-40 I Writing on, Cutting Pier 25. 100. 5-41 I Diving from Pier 25. 100. 5-42 I Skates, Skateboards, Bikes Prohibited 25. 50. 5-43 I Dogs, Cats, Animals Prohibited 25. 50. 5-44 I Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages Prohibited 25. 100. 5-45 I Swimming, etc., Near Pier Prohibited 25. 50. 5-46 I Trespassing on Restricted/Closed Portion 25. 100. 5-47 (a to j) I Unapproved Fish Stalls 25. 100. • BICYCLES • 6-1 I License Required 10. 15. 6-6 M Removal of Frame Numbers, License, etc. 10. 250. CIVIL DEFENSE & DISASTER 8-13 (a, b, c) M ALL VIOLATIONS OF CHAPTER 500. 1000. DANCES & DANCE HALLS 10-2 I Permit Required 25. 100. 10-4 I License Required 25. 100. 10-5 M Dance Hall Regulations; Fail to Obey 100. 1000. 10-7 M Night Club, Cabaret, Generally 100. 1000. GAMBLING ALL SECTIONS VIOLATED ARE MISDEMEANOR 500. 1000. BUSINESS LICENSES ALL SECTIONS VIOLATED ARE INFRACTIONS 25. 100. MINORS 18-1 • M Firearms - Sale to Minors 100. 1000. 18-2 M Firearms - Possession by Minors 100. 500. 18-5 M Allowing Violation of Chapter 100. 500. 3 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BAIL SCHEDULE VIOLATION CLASS. TITLE OLD NEW 18-8 M Purchase of School Books from Minor 100. 250. 18-9 M Motion Picture Regulations 100. 250. 18-11 M Female Dance Instructors - Minors 100. 250. 18-12 M Illumination of Premises w/Minor Dance Inst. 100. 250. 18-13 M (Other) Violations of Chapter 18 • 100. 500. . NOISE REGULATIONS (CHAPTER 194) ALL SECTIONS VIOLATED ARE INFRACTIONS (194-26) 25. 100. NUISANCES (CHAPTER 20) ALL SECTIONS VIOLATED ARE MISDEMEANORS 100. 250. MISCELLANEOUS 21-1 • M Abandoned Refrigerators 100. 500. 21-2 M Furnishing Pornography, Horror to Juvenile - 500. 21-3 M Disorderly Conduct 100. 500. 21-4 M Inhaling/Drinking Certain Substances 65. 250. 21-5 M Discharging Weapon (west Hermosa Avenue) 100. 500. 21-6 M Discharging Weapon - City Wide 100. 500. 21-7 I Magazines/Newspapers; Permit to Sell 100. 100. 21-8 M Massage Parlors 500. 1000. 21-9 M Oil - Deposits Prohibited 100. 500. 21-10 M Oil - Unlawful Drilling/Wells 500... 1000. 21-11 M Spilling Oil on Streets 100. 500. 21-12 M Spilling Oil - By Vehicle Transporting 100. 1000. 21-13 M Poolhalls - Hours of Operation 100. 500. 21-15 M Silicitation for Prostitution 500. 1000. 21-16 M Trespass on Property Vital to National Defense 100. 1000. 21-19 M Contaminating Water Supply 50. 1000. 21-20 M Contaminating - Storeage ac Inlets 50. 500. 21-22 M Weapons - Carrying Concealed 100. 250. 21-23 I Drinking on Street/Playground 50. 100. 21-24 - M Littering (Generally) - 250. 21-25 M Littering; Storing Refuse, Garbage - 250. 4 VIOLATION CLASS. 21-27 21-28 • 21-30 21-32 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BAIL SCHEDULE TITLE OLD M Fleeing from Peace Officer M False Information to Peace Officer M Sale of Drug Paraphernalia M Nudity Prohibited PARKS & PLAYGROUNDS (CHAPTER 22) ALL SECTIONS VIOLATED ARE INFRACTIONS PAWNBROKERS & JUNK DEALERS (CHAPTER 23) ALL SECTIONS VIOLATED ARE MISDEMEANORS PUBLIC EATING PLACES (CHAPTER 25) ALL SECTIONS. VIOLATED ARE MISDEMEANORS REGISTRATION OF CONVICTED PERSONS (CHAPTER 26) M Failure to Register in Five (5) Days 100. • RODENT CONTROL (CHAPTER 27) VIOLATED ARE INFRACTIONS 50. SEWAGE (CHAPTER 28) VIOLATED ARE MISDEMEANORS (DISCHARGES do INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL) 100. 1000. STREETS & SIDEWALKS (CHAPTER 29) VIOLATED ARE MISDEMEANORS 500. 1000. TAXICABS (CHAPTER 31) VIOLATED ARE INFRACTIONS 25. 100. 26-2 ALL SECTIONS ALL SECTIONS ALL SECTIONS ALL SECTIONS NEW 250. 250. 250. 500. 25. 100. . 50/500. 500. 25. 250. ...500. 100. [ANY VIOLATION OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, NOT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN THE REVISED BAIL SCHEDULE ABOVE, SHALL BE A MISDEMEANOR, PURSUANT TO § 1-7 HBMC BEFORE REVISION, EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1, 19841 Revised: July 18, 1984 5 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL February 21, 1989 Regular Meeting of February 28, 1989 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #17513 (C.U.P. CON NO. 86-2) LOCATION: 1020 MONTEREY BOULEVARD APPLICANT: DAVE SHAW REQUEST: APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP FOR 4 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #17513 which is consistent with the approved Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map #17513 at their February 18, 1986 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: is ae c u Planning Director ;5?!/ Kevin . Nbrth9raft City Manager T/srfinmap ubmitted, An 'Pe Associate 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP #17513 FOR A FOUR -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1020 MONTEREY BOULEVARD, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on February 28, 1989 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 86-12, adop- ted after public hearing on February 18, 1986. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Tract Map #17513 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 1 13 14 15 16 1 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 56, First Addition to the Hermosa Beach Tract, as recorded in Book 1, Pages 59 & 60 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles, for a four -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 1020 Monterey Boulevard, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1989. day of PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermo- sa Beach, California. ATTEST: PROVED AS'TN FOR T/rsfinmap CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 1 v HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL February 21, 1989 Regular Meeting of February 28, 1989 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #45183 (C.U.P. CON NO. 87-1) LOCATION: 1522-1524 AND 1530 LOMA DRIVE APPLICANT: LINDA GEIL REQUEST: APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP FOR 6 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Tract Map #45183 which is con- sistent with the approved Tentative Tract Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map #45183 at their April 7, 1987 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Tentative Tract Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONC Michael Schubach Planning Director Kevin North,cra t City Manager T/srfinmap Respe full ubmitted, • Andrew Per Associate Tanner 1 ■ 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP #45183 FOR A SIX -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1522-1524 AND 1530 LOMA DRIVE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on February 28, 1989 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 87-22, adop- ted after public hearing on April 7, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Tract Map #45183 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lots 11 and 12, Hiss Addition to the Hermosa Beach Tract, as recorded in Book 4, Page 19 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles, for a six -unit con- dominium project on land commonly known as 1522-1524 and 1530 Loma Drive, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermo- sa Beach, California. ATTEST: A'PROVED AS ORM: 1 11 1 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /rsfinmap CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY February 14, Honorable Mayor and Members City Council of the City Council February 28, 1989 Meeting of 1989 RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A MONTH TO MONTH LEASE, FOR FOUR PARKING SPACES ON LOT "G", TO A & H MOTORS, CONTINGENT UPON PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A CUP TO OPERATE AN AUTO BROKERAGE AT 424 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council approve a month to month lease, for four (4) parking spaces on Lot "G" at $50.00 per space, per month, to A & H Motors. Said approval to be contingent upon Planning Commission approval of a CUP to operate an auto brokerage at 424 Pacific Coast Highway. Background: On January 5, 1989, Mr. Rick Ballinger, representing A & H Motors, appeared before the Environmental Review Committee to request a Conditional Use Permit to operate an auto brokerage at 424 Pacific Coast Highway. The action taken, by the Committee was; "to recommend that the planning Commission deny a Conditional Use Permit and deny a negative declaration since impacts associated with the parking problems could not be mitigated" (see attached copy of minutes). Subsequently, Mr. Ballinger contacted Associate Planner Perea, to inquire if some arrangement could be made, to satisfy his parking requirements, utilizing the metered spaces on the City -owned parking lot adjacent to his business. Mr. Perea referred him to our office. As a result of my conversation with Mr. Ballinger, the attached letter of request was received. On March 8, 1983, the City Council adopted an ordinance establishing a parking meter zone on the City -owned lot legally described as the "Easterly 31' of Lot 3 - Hurd's Ocean View Tract" (see attached map). The intent was to provide additional customer parking between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6 p.m. daily plus additional residential parking during the non -enforcement hours. Prior to that time, the lot was an unimproved dirt area. There are ten (10) metered spaces on the lot. Analysis: Our experience is that the lot has been under-utilized during merchant business hours since installment. We have no record of the revenue received specifically from this lot since our employees neither seperate nor count meter coin. The money is collected via a security collection system and turned into the Bank of America for counting. However, the employees can gauge, ik by the weight and fullness of the security coin canisters, that the meters are generally low yield. Our projected meter revenue for fiscal year 1988/89 is $580,000, currently we have 1790 meters therefore, we average $331.43 per meter per year. However, realistically we are aware that the meters in the commercial areas, closest to the beach, glean much more revenue than those in the residential areas (as well as, in this case, those adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway). Additionally, our enforcement officers report very few citations are issued in the lot. Staff believes that leasing four of the ten spaces would be of advantage to both the City and A & H Motors. There would still be six spaces available for the customers of other merchants. We further believe that the fee of $50.00 per space, per month, is reasonable. While there is a potential for approximately $180 @ month per space (based upon 25 cents per half hour, nine hours @ day, seven days @ week), if they were constantly in use, we know this is not the case. Based on a lease of $50 per month, per space, we would be guaranteed an income, over the year, of $600 per space. This is well above the average. Finally, we have no knowledge of any legal impediment to leasing the parking spaces to an individual business. I met with Attorney Lough on 2/14/89 re. this matter and he concurs. Should the City Council agree with staff's recommendation, we advise that the meters be removed and A & H Motors be allowed to post signs indicating that the four parking spaces are reserved. General Services Director Noted for fiscal impact: Not here to sign. Viki Copeland Finance Administrator CITY MANAGER COMMENT: A & H Motors is an existing business that recently moved as a result of City zoning enforcement. The owner expressed interest in staying in our City, and staff provided alternatives consistent with City Goal #11 - Promote positive commercial developments. There are two possible concerns about this recommendation: 1) Other commercial interests may wish to consider leasing these spaces. The month-to-month aspect will allow us to reconsider if this occurs. 2) If the lease is terminated, other parking should be provided or the conditional use permit revoked. Staff will recommend this condition to the Planning Commission when it considers the CUP. 2 PROJECT CUP 88-18 ▪ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING.PLAN FOR AUTO BROKERAGE AT 424 PACIFIC COAST HWY., A & H MOTORS. APPLICANT: Rick Ballinger . Mr. Perea explained that the applicant is requesting a CUP' to operate an auto brokerge. They were previously at a Pier Avenue location, but not in a permitted area, therefore they had to relocate. They show the store area as 850 square feet and four tandem parking spaces. Mr. Perea asked if any customer parking was provided. Mr. Ballinger replied that they had one customer on the lot, and additional on street parking. Mr. Peres asked how long a car would stay on. the lot: Mr. Ballinger replied that they would stay fora maximum of one day. Mr. Perea asked if any chemicals were involved in detailing the cars. • • Mr. Ballinger replied no. Mr. Grove inquired about after market installations.' Mr. Ballinger replied that only basic stereos were installed on the lot—, Mr. Perea asked how the tandem parking would work and the number of people employed at that location. • Mr. Ballinger replied that they will have three full time and two part time employees. He explained that only 3 of the total• employees would be using the parking. • . Mr. Groye advised that the alley is only ten feet, therefore they .. • cannot use the two spaces as tandem parking because of the required turning radius. • Mr. Grove stated that the current zoning code designates only • auto dealers, if this is the case, they should be separate classification. If this is not the case, they do not have enough required parking. Mr. Perea asked if the Planning Commission should consider a separtate class for auto brokerage. •,.. Mr. Grove replied•that if not, they do not have a large enough site. • Motion by Mr. Grove to recommend that the Planning Commission deny a Conditional Use Permit and deny a negative declaration since impacts associated with the parking problems coud not be mitigated. Second by Mr. Antich. No objection, so ordered. - 3 - S#e/6 �' '-t; ..., u ,/4/ef MOTORS911-11-9 New cars • Sales & leasing • Import & domestic TO: Joan Noon, Director of General Services FROM: David Feldman, A & H Motors DATE: February 8, 1989 SUBJECT: Request for Additional Parking This letter is being written to request that A & H Motors be granted permission to rent or lease four (4) parking spaces, from the City of Hermosa Beach, in the metered parking lot on fourth (4th) street. This request is being made in order to comply with the requirements of the Planning Department, regarding parking restrictions for the issuance of a conditional use permit. This parking lot is approximately fifty (50) feet from the A & H Motors operating location and is used very little. As such, the City of Hermosa Beach receives very little monetary benefits from this lot. A & H Motors is offering to pay the city a set fee of $50.00 per month, per space, for the use of a portion of this lot. Should the city feel that this amount is insufficient we would appreciate an offer being made and we will evaluate whether that amount is affordable at that time. Your cooperation and favorable review of this request would be greatly appreciated. A & H Motors 424 Pacific Coast Hwy., Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 318-3521 59 4TH ST. (U) 0 0 0 0 Q 90 90 5TH S. 76°34'' 1 /16 17.41 0 /z 18 e 19 20 /s 21 . 11 ® 22 10 //6eil (20,,; p..\\o 48 .?23 O //6 i /00 /9 1 p ,st /6 ' 4 1 4-/ 48 m i 2 %00 iG 1 O 4TH Z ST. r 5s • 1 S8 // i el S8 S8 // 66 1 a /8 15 x O O 0 14 om �l2. I, . 11 Q. 10 //6eil (20,,; 48 48 12 O O 4 S- r2 n` 48 ST. ° GARDEN ,,,,.e� V/ 9-55 9_55 NURD'S 0 1 40 z W 0 February 23, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of February 28, 1989 RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE CONTRACTING WITH A CONSULTANT FOR AN AUDIT OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM, AND TO APPROPRIATE AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $3,500 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Richter Group Communications Consultants, and 2. Appropriate an amount, not to exceed $3,500, from Prospective Expenditures to pay for the services of the communications consultant. BACKGROUND: The City began operating its own public safety dispatch system on December 29, 1988. During the first month of operation, the 911 system failed on three separate occassions, for three different reasons. This, coupled with the fact that the entire changeover was a massive undertaking, prompted the recommen- dation to have an independent review/audit of the total system. The purpose of this review/audit is to assess the system, identify any areas that may be deficient, and make any recommendations to improve the ability of the system to service the citizens. ANALYSIS: The Richter Group conducted a complete communications study for the City of Hermosa Beach in 1982. Since they are already familiar with the City and its needs, it is felt that they could provide a meaningful study in the most expedi- tious manner. CONCUR: Kevin B. Northcrdit, City Manager bmitted, Steve S. Wisniewski Director of Public Safety 1 RICHTER GROUP Communications Consultants Henry L. Richter, PhD, PE February 18, 1989 Mr. Steve S. Wisniewski Director of Public Safety CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH P.O. Box 307 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear Mr. Wisniewski: 178 W. LONGDEN AVE. ARCADIA, CA., 91006-8231 818 / 445-0249 89-112 Thank you for the time you spent with me last Thursday. I am very impressed with what has happened in the Department since we did the analysis seven years ago. I can tell a sizeable investment has been accorded your Department. What meets the eye on a casual tour shows that you are determined to put in a system that will give the City the finest of capability and that will give good, cost-effective service for the next decade. It is my pleasure at this time to make a proposal to you and your City management to perform a follow-up review of the study that we did seven years ago and to give you a report analyzing the state of affairs in the Hermosa Beach Police and Fire communications environment. I am not proposing that we perform the prior study over again or that we do a detailed analysis of your communications plant and operations. What I am proposing is that Glenn Marin and I, as knowledgeable public -safety communications consultants, spend a couple days reviewing your equipment and operation in the light of our prior deficiency analyses and recommendations. The product of this work would be a report to you and your management essentially providing a fresh assessment of your communications plant and operations, developing any recommendations that we can, and detailing any deficiencies that we can identify as existing at this time. This would include, but not be limited to, a number of aspects of your operation. It would include reviewing your radio licenses, radio channelization, channel utilization, additional channel or spectrum needs, radio equipment inventory (including some spot checks on radio performance)•, console installation and design, MDT system design, status and prognosis, disaster and contingency planning, communication ties with nearby agencies, and a shopping list of additional areas of concern which will develop as we go along. The end product of this study will be a report 12-15 pages in length. It will not be a detailed documentation of what exists, but more, just a succinct reporting of our observation, examinations and findings resulting in an analysis, and a set of recommendations covering your public -safety communications. Mr. Steve Wisniewski Page Two City of Hermosa Beach February 18, 1989 I am proposing this to you on a fixed price basis. I believe that a fixed price arrangement is far the best for both consultant and client. The proposed price of $3,350.00 is a total one including all staff time, office support, transportation, and other such costs. I will furnish three copies of the report to you. Should you choose to accept this proposal, we can be prepared to begin the task in the first week of March or whenever is convenient with you and your staff. Thank you for the courtesy of meeting with me and for the informal tour of the facility. Again, I must say I am truly amazed and impressed with what I saw. Cordially yours,/ r/-r.--e Henry L. chter, Ph.D., PE xc: Mr. Glenn Marin s/. QU 5597 February 16, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 28, 1989 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR FEDERAL AID - HIGHLAND AVENUE WIDENING FROM LONGFELLOW AVENUE TO 35TH STREET, CIP 85-102 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 89- , a resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign the attached agreement with the State of California for Federal Aid on Highland Avenue Widening from Longfellow Avenue to 35th Street. Background: On January 24, 1989 City Council authorized staff to advertise for construction bids on CIP 85-102, Highland Avenue Widening. The project is funded 86.4 % by Federal Urban Aid (FAU) Funds. The State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is administering FAU Funds for this project. Analysis: An agreement needs to be executed to recieve federal funds. A copy of the agreement is on file in the City Clerks Office. The agreement requires that certain "special covenants" are fulfilled such as: 1. The City must regularly maintain the street. 2. Caltrans must concur in the award of the contract (i.e. awarded to lowest cost and most responsible bidder, etc.). 3. Federal funds will be limited to the estimated amount. 4. Non discrimination requirements must be met. 5. A post audit report must be submitted for consultant costs over $25,000. All of the special covenants can be met. 1 ih Fiscal Impact: This project is funded per the Federal Funds: City Funds: Total Estimated Project Cost: Respectfully submitted: S. to., Brian Gengler/ Assistant Engineer Concur: Anthony Antich Director of Public Works ty/reshaw agreement as $106,321 16,679 $123,000 2 follows: 86.4 % 13.6 % 100.0 % Noted for Fiscal Impact: Not here to sign.�y-- Viki Copeland Finance Administrator Concur: RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 002 TO LOCAL AGENCY STATE AGREEMENT NO. 07-5155 FOR PURPOSES OF FUNDING FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE WIDENING FROM LONGFELLOW AVENUE TO 35TH STREET. WHEREAS, the City desires to obtain Federal Funding for CIP 85-102 , Highland Avenue Widening from Longfellow Avenue to 35th Street; and WHEREAS, the City entered into a Local Agency -State Agreement for Federal Aid on October 25, 1977; and WHEREAS, the City and the State desire to amend this agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby adopt Program Supplement No. 002 to Local Agency -State Agreement for Federal Aid Projects No. 07-5155, attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this th day of , 1989 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: e7C Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council February 6, 1989 City Council Meeting of February 28, 1989 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING SECTION 4-8 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING AN OFF -LEASH DOG EXERCISE AND TRAINING AREA UPON THE OPEN SPACE PROPERTY, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE GREENBELT/RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council consider adopting the attached ordinance amending Section 4-8 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, establishing an off -leash dog exercise and training area upon the open space property, commonly known as the Greenbelt/Railroad Right of Way. Background: At your regularly scheduled meeting of October 25, 1988, based upon a recommendation from City Manager Northcraft to enforce the leash law and defecation ordinances on the railroad -right -of way, the City Council took the following action; To affirm phased -in enforcement of existing ordinance pro- visions regarding dog defiling and leashes upon the Green- belt, and posting of signs in the public -right -of way, with a goal of a January 1st enforcement date. Temporary signs along right-of-way approximately 200 feet to inform public when we will begin enforcing, and perhaps warning notices given until the enforcement date. It was suggested that information be provided with dog licenses regarding the leash and defiling laws. - Minutes 10-25-88 (see attached). Subsequently, at your regularly scheduled meeting of December 13, 1988, the City Council received a petition of 522 signatures requesting railroad right-of-way to remain as an off -leash area. At that time the City Council took the following action: To set a Public Hearing for the agenda at the earliest reasonable date, to decide whether or not to enforce the leash law on the railroad right-of-way, fully noticed, with no enforcement until after the public hearing (see attached). Research: In an effort to present an objective opinion, staff has sought information from the following; Los Angeles County Animal Control, contracting for service with 35 cities and unincorporated areas in Los Angeles County. SPCA, contracted to service 16 cities in Los Angeles County, and; Sally Hazard, President of the California Animal Control Director's Association. Los Angeles County Animal Control reports all cities, serviced by their department, enforce the leash law without exception. SPCA (California Humane Society) reports all of their contract cities enforce the leash law, with the exception of Rolling Hills which has no leash law. Ms. Hazard, in addition to being President of the CACDA, is the Director of The County of San Diego Department of Animal Control. She forwarded to us a San Diego County Ordinance which provides for exceptions to the leash law (see attached). The petitioners/proponents have submitted for your review an ordinance adopted by the Los Angeles City Council, which authorizes a "pilot" dog exercise and training area in Laurel Canyon Park, exempt from the Los Angeles City Leash Law (see attached). We have modeled our proposed ordinance after this law, without restriction. In order to provide as much pertinent information as possible, staff researched our "bite report file" over the past eight years. Our records indicate one hundred and eight (108) bite incidents occured during that period. Of these, only one in 1985, occured on the railroad right-of-way. Two in 1983 were a result of accidents involving "dog vs. vehicle". To the best of our recollection, although the incident reports do not reflect same, these were occurences that resulted from dogs off -leash on the RROW. However, these incidents equate to less than.3% which does not appear to indicate a significant problem. We have attached documentation for your review. Investigation of California State Law, indicates that there is no uniform state-wide leash law. We did find the following leash law regulations; Female in heat - prohibited FD & Agr 30954 On farm where livestock or fowl without permission of owner. FD & AGR 30955 Prohibited to run at large in Mobile Home Parks H & S 18601 Existing authority has right to seize, impound a dog or issue citations, as a result of dog being on property other than that owned by it's owner or person who controls dog Govt. 53 072 On January 12th at 7:45 a.m., I toured the RROW with Michael Flaherty, Public Works Lead Man in charge of Parks. I observed; 1. Approximately thirty five (35) to forty (40) utilizing the path. 2. A mixture of joggers, dog -walkers and school 3. A congenial and friendly atmosphere. 4. No apparent problem. 5. bog owners carring leashes and I, in fact, observed them leashing dogs upon exiting path. 6. An additional path, between Pier Avenue and Gould that could be considered for a seperate use. I did have the opportunity to stop and chat with some persons along the way and I cannot resist sharing with you one conversation. It was brought to my attention, that two dog owners met on the path and as a result, of at least this common interest, were married on New Year's Eve -1989. Just think - romance on the RROW. persons children. Analysis: It appears from our research, that the City Council does have the authority to make an exception to the leash law. In fact, this has been done in other jurisdictions. However, we defer to the City Attorney as to any legal ramifications. It further appears, there has been no significant problem as a result of non -enforcement on the RROW. Whatever decision is made by Your Honorable Body, regarding enforcement of the leash law, we will institute regular patrol to deal with violations of defecation and license ordinances. The field officers state that it is difficult to enforce the defecation law, as we must observe the violation, under current law. It may be advisable to adopt an ordinance that requires the dog owner to carry a container to pick up after their dog. This will increase our city-wide compliance. Alternatives: 1. Refer to the Community Resources/Parks and Recreation Comm- ission for further study and recommendation. 2. Refer to Public Works to consider and advise re. another path, separated in some way from the jogging path, as an off - leash area i.e. as there is between Pier Avenue and Gould. - 3 - • ti 3. Direct staff to prepare an ordinance that requires dog owners to carry a container to clean up after their dog. 4. Adopt the ordinance with stipulations that those dog owners who wish to utilize the off -leash area; 1. Show proof of Hermosa Beach residency. 2. Sign a waiver, releasing the City from all liability that may be incurred. 3. Purchase an annual permit. One or all of the above stipulations to be imposed. 4. Enforce all laws on the RROW. JoajVNoon General Services Director Concur: !% Kevin Northpraft City Manager CITY MANAGER COMMENT: This recommendation does not appear to be consistent with the City Goal regarding "Enforcement of Laws" (tied for No. 4 priority), which is the reason that this matter arose. Rather, it recognizes that the law does not seem necessary and should be changed to reflect historical enforcement practices. It is apparent that our citizens utilize the Greenbelt for their dogs and value not being required to use leashes. Given the absence of significant problems, there is rationale to continue to allow an off -leash area. However, Alternative #2, to limit the off -leash area to a portion of the Greenbelt, may be a better compromise of dog owner and other Greenbelt users' interests. It might also be a better precaution against the dog -related problems that can occur when dogs are off -leash. Such problems led to the almost universal application of leash laws in municipalities. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING SECTION 4-8 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE DESIGNATING AS AN OFF -LEASH DOG EXERCISE AND TRAINING AREA THE OPEN SPACE PROPERTY ALSO KNOWN AS THE THE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY/GREENBELT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Chapter 4 "Animals and Fowl", Article II. • DOGS, Section 4-8 of the Hermosa Beach City Code shall be and hereby is amended as follows, by adding subsection (a): Chapter 4 ANIMALS AND FOWL Article II. Dogs, § 4-8 Section 4-8 (a). Off -leash dog exercise and training area. "Nothwithstanding any other provisions of this code, the provisions of this section (supra) shall not apply to the open space property area known as the "Railroad right-of-way/Greenbelt" as described and more specifically shown outlined on the attached map, and on the with the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach. Legally licensed dogs may be allowed, unleashed, providing the dog(s) are under the competent control of the owner/designee responsible for the custody, care or control of such dog(s). Off -leash privileges shall apply only upon the designated area, and use of a leash as required in this section, shall be mandatory when going to or /1/1 1/1/ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 coming from the confines of the off -leash area." SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this th day of , 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the • City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: ROVED AS O ORM: 15 1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 , CITY CLERK , CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF • IIERMIOSA BEACII 'CAILIIIFCDIR]I A SCALE: 1 INCN•400 FEET • • r1 D i • f •! ;N�=tet•. LL. LIL 1! r ALN 7 ,1171:770-7,1, ,--, =t` -- r LEGEND: = RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY/GREENBELT OPEN SPACE BOUNDARIES: ARDMORE AVENUE WESTERLY CURB TO VALLEY DRIVE EASTERLY CURB; (EAST/WEST BOUNDARY) HERMOSA BEACH NORTHERLY BOUNDARY TO HERMOSA BEACH SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY; (NORTH/SOUTH BOUNDARY) EXCLUSIVE OF STREETS AND/OR .VEHICULAR RIGHTS-OF-WAY. I. TO: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, General Services Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 I AM IN FAVOR OF AN ORDINANCE PEBMt TING DOGS TO BE OFF LEASH ON THE GREENBELT. Date: "2=-2-0" c (Signed) Address: ' ) \ M$-'\ TION 11t12P-Ma I RI I k caW VP TO: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, General Services Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 I AM IN FAVOR OF AN ORDINANCE PERMITTING DOGS TO BE OFF LEASH ON THE GREENBELT. Date: 01 - /q-g'j Address: Signed) clotq V' I L \--9a I 1 NS w \)A-"" -_ca kw,uut. .1 4 J•J'‘ZA" 3,4) 1p i =111.1►-- - --STY OF HERMOSA BEACH,General Services Department . 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 I AM IN FAVOR OF AN ORDINANCE PERMITTING DOGS TO BE OFF LEASH ON THE GREENBELT. Date: �--kt -cvA Address: Y -„--- TO: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, General Services Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 I AM IN FAVOR OF AN ORDINANCE PERMITTING DOGS TO BE OFF LEASH ON THE GREENBELT. Date: 2,4441I v cc Address: #9'62. 1 / c) er t 21 February 1989 City of Hermosa Beach General Services Department 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Department Employees, I very much enjoy the privilege and responsibility of being able to exercise with my unleashed dog on the Greenbelt area. We walk, jog, play with other dogs we meet, play fetch, and generally enjoy the pleasure of being outdoors. As you know, the Greenbelt area is unique as an area in which a person can have space to enjoy their dog's company without being a criminal for doing so. I especially value the area as a place where my kids can be kids, the dog can be a dog, and they don't have to worry about someone coming along to write them a ticket for having simple, honest fun. Please keep the Greenbelt a leash -free zone. Please don't become an uptight, regulation -happy city like Manhattan Beach. Please allow your residents and visitors a reasonable exercise of freedom. When it is so easy in today's environment for kids to choose to use.TV, malls, beer, and drugs for entertainment, let's please give them the option of a simple pleasure like a place to play fetch with their dog (an activity with unfortunately can not be done in the tiny lots we call home with any dog much larger than a toy poodle). Sincerely, Carol Zee 432 1st S Manhattan Beach IMPORTANT DATES: Tuesday, 2/28/89, City Hall BULLETI N RE: GREENBELT LEASH LAW 8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING before the Hermosa Beach City Council regarding the Greenbelt leash law issue. PLEASE ATTEND and urge your friends and neighbors to attend. Bring a leash to identify yourself as being in favor' of an ordinance permitting dogs to be off leash on the Greenbelt. Saturday, 2/25/89, 1:00 P.M. Preparation meeting. 142 Monterey Boulevard, Hermosa Beach (come through chain link gate to rear). TODAY: Write or call the City officials. Tell them why it is important to you that your dog be permitted to continue to run and play unleashed on the Greenbelt. Tell them who you are, where you live and how the quality of your life in Hermosa Beach would be changed if your dog had to be leashed while you are walking, jogging, socializing, etc. Remind them that you voted that the Greenbelt remain as is. Call: 318-0215 and/or Write: Direct your letters to General Services Department, City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 and/or Detach, complete and mail the bottom portion -of this bulletin -to General—Services at the address shown. TO: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, General Services Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 I AM IN FAVOR OF AN ORDINANCE PERMITTING DOGS TO BE OFF LEASH ON THE GREENBELT. Date: 44—/S%-4-7 /� 4,4=1,s4-/ (Signed) Address: Alex -1.4177#" 4/6> �-Y� 17Gr4/1 c)-.�Y� (te •FE.,5 1 1999 , , ..•. CATHERINE CRUDUP • . 51 •18th Street ‘• Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 •9/J3)2, • (14; _Iget„etA. ,.4c(14224/4? 4 • A .d-alra- /4,-44'7/Lila-al- &a -6k dei,Lha_ 21-4( A.Lizei 2s 1g7( ,rite) rzcAeAla,Sed •-&-eZ 4421-7./.4.10c, zifvf Gdleyd".zt.." d.A.teLe. • t.,..-w-s-lit-.tW:AL f • • '4444Z'er 4:tira PL4:9tIte..)} 41i)1 ":41414dar, t.04}1%141t. 4a,ta/ TO: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, General Services Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 I AM IN FAVOR OF AN ORDINANCE PERMITTING DOGS TO BE OFF LEASH ON THE GREENBELT. Date: .2-A%�y Address: igned) 3?5 42,re4,e TO: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, General Services Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 I AM IN FAVOR OF AN ORDINANCE PERMITTING DOGS TO BE OFF LEASH ON THE GREENBELT. Date: (Signed) Address: �(17-7�`'. aACKCRavaD MATER/AL /. RECOMMENDATION TO INCREASE ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS ON CER- TAIN CITY ORDINANCES. Memorandum from City Manager Ke- vin B. Northcraft dated October 5, 1988. (Continued from October 11, 1988 meeting.) Action: To affirm the phased -in enforcement of existing ordinance provisions regarding dog defiling and leashes upon the Greenbelt, trash enclosures, and posting of signs in the public right-of-way, with a goal of a January 1st enforcement date. Temporary signs along right-of-way appx. every 200 feet to inform.public when we will be begin'enforcing, and perhaps warning notices given until the enforcement date. It was suggested that information be provided with dog licenses regarding the leash and defiling laws. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered.' 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER None 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL '(a)' Appointment of Bicentennial Committee. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated October 6, 1988. (Continued from October 11, 1988 meeting.). Action:• To appoint to the Hermosa.Beach Bicentennial Committee: Kathleen Midstokke, George Schmeltzer, and Lance Widman; and that the above appointees be au- thorized to appoint additional volunteers to serve on this committee. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. (b) Request for City Council to schedule a joint meeting with the Civil Service Board. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated October 18, 1988, Action: To approve the setting of a meeting, and have the Mayor call it when an agreeable date is set. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. (c) Approval of selection process for commissioners. Memo- randum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated Oc- tober 20, 1988. Supplemental memorandum from City Clerk dated October 25, 1988. Action: To be sent back to staff and City Attorney for review. Motion Simpson, second Creighton. So ordered. 6 Minutes 10-25-88 Action: To waiver full reading of Ordinance No. 88-969 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 18-3 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLED "MINORS"." Motion Simpson, second Creighton AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None Final Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 88-969. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. 3• ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1 a, d, f, m, o, p, r, s, and w were discussed at this item but are listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) Petition with 522 signatures requesting railroad right- of-way to remain as an off -leash area, and 6 letters '_ from various residents requesting area to remain as it is currently. Supplemental petition with 30 additional signature. Further supplemental petition with 19 addi- tional signatures, supplemental letter from James Toomey 39 -10th Street received December 12, oppossing leash law enforcement, Eileen Martiih - 329 -31st Street, and Loni Sacks - 519 -24th Place. Addressing the council on this item as spokesperson for a large group in the audience was: Tom Arp - 233 Ardmore Avenue Action: To set a Public Hearing for the agenda at the earliest reasonable date, to decide whether or not to enforce the leash law on the railroad right-of-way, ful- ly noticed, with no enforcement until after the public hearing. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger NOES - None PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. PROPOSED REZONE OF AREA 10 FROM R-2 TO R-1, AREA 11 FROM R-3 TO R-2, AND AREA 12 FROM R-3 TO C-3 OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION, WITH ORDINANCE. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 5, 1988. "' 7 - Minutes 12-13-88 It %hall be unlawful for an% firm, person oe corpora:svn 6•. rv........,.. ,., and of operate a power haat or other device in the viclnttof and within 100 feet of an% bather or swinsnser in the above designated beach areas known primate as bathing and swimming areas. except for the purpose of making a rescue. at for launt•htrsc or beaching a boat in the area described In Section 63.20.9. SEC. 63.20.8 SAME — LIFEGUARDS AUTHORIZED TO ENFORCE STATE AND LOCAL CODES — ARRESTS AND CITATIONS A. Purpose and Intent. 1t is the purpose and intent of the Council in enacting this section that alt City lifeguards be specifically authorized punuant to the provisions of Section 836.5 of the Penal Code of the State of Califuruia, to make arrests without a warrant whenever any such lifeguard has reasonable cause to believe that• the person 10 be arrested has com- misted a misdemeanor in the Lifeguard's presence which is a violation of a statute or ordinance which such lifeguard has the duty to enforce. B. That lifeguards of Thc City of San Diego, be, and they are hereby authorized. em- pov.•ered and given the duty to enforce provisions of the San Diego Municipal Codc and n...demeanors designated in the State Codes; to make arrests without a warrant whenever a: v such lifeguard has reasonable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has c.•mtnitted a misdemeanor in the lifeguard's presence; and while engaged in the performance of '.cir duties, to arrest persons and issue citations for violations of said Codes under the pro‘. -..ns of Sections 896.5 and 853.6 of the Penal Code of the State of California when violations occur in City of San Diego beach ams. OW SEC. 63.20.8 SAME — SURFBOARD AREAS ESTASLISHED) Amended 7.14.59 by Ord. 8146 N.S.) Amended 3.2.61 by Ord. 8452 N.S.) Amended 8-1-61 by Ord. 8502 N.S.) Repealed 5-14-64 by Ord. 9016 N.S.) • New SEC. 63.20.8 SAME — UFEGUARDS AUTHORIZED TO ENFORCE STATE AND. LOCAL CODES — ARRESTS AND CITATIONS) (Added 6.13-72 by Ord. 10855 N.S.) • Sl C. 63.20.9 RO.AT REACHING AREAS • Vie Director of Parks and Recreation may designate any beach areas or portions tis-•reit as an :tr'•a which roav bre used lot the purpose of beaching or launching !waif:. and may establish and collect fees for the use of such boat beaching or launching areas subject to the approval of the City Council. Such provisions shall DP effective when signs are posted in such areas giving notice of such 1Pstgnat.•m and fees. Nti oils to shall drive or cause to he driven any motor vehicle as defined in the V"d:tc jr Ccdt• of the State of California on any Deach. provided. however. that motor vehicles of The City of San Diego nn official business and motor vehicles being operated for the purpose of launching nt beaching a boat may be operated across areas designated as haat launching or beaching areas. (Amended 2.2-56 by Ord. 6851 P.S.) SEC. 63.20.10 SAME — FIRES, WASTE MATERIAL. PROHIBITED — INTERFERENCE WITH BOATS PROHIBITED, . It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to build any fire or leave any waste materials. or for any swimmer or bather to remain in or to in any way interfere with any boat being launched. in the arca described in paragraph (a) of Section 63.20.9. (Incorp. 1.22.52 by Ord. 5046 NS., container in Ord. 9750 N.S. adopted 5-1848) SEC. 63.20.11 SAME — CAMPING, SLEEPING OVERNIGHT PROHIBITED — EXCEPTIONS ft shall be unlawful for any person. firm or corporation. other than one specifically authorized by .cerise or lease from Thc City of San Diego, to camp, lodge, sleep or tarry over- night. or to er• :t. maintain, use or occupy upon any public beach in this city any tent, lodge. shelter or structure, unless the same shall have two sides thrreof open and unleu there shall . be an unobstructed view into such lodge. structure, shelter, v. tent from the outside or at least two sides thereof. (Incorp. 1.22.52 by Ord. 5046 NS., contained in Ord. 4355 NS. adopted 44-50) SEC 63.20.12 SAME — DOGS PROHIBITED A. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Code. no person shall take any dog, whether leashed or unleashed. upon any public beach or any public park adjacent thereto, or any si.lrwalk adjacent to any public beach, in the City of San Diego between the hours of 9 a.m. and 6 p.m., nor shall any person owning or having charge, cart. custody or control of any dog cause, permit or allow such dog to be upon ary public beach. any public park adjacent to a public beach or any sidewalk a4ja:ent to any public beach a any time during the above specified hours. Abet 6 p.m. and vista 9 r.nh.. the ptuvisiuns ut Section 63.669 of the County Codc eat the County of San Uic:v a Adopted by Section 44.0300 of this Codc shall apply. 8. the provisions of this section shall not apply to dogs which have been especially trained for and are used as guide dogs for the blind while such dogs are being used for such purpose. C. The provisions of this section shall not apply to Fiesta Island in Mission Bay Park or to the beach arca at the west end of the San Diego River Floodway, also known as the Ocean Beach Flood Control Channel. D. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Codc. legally licensed dogs shall be allowed, unleashed. in the two areas described in subsection C above, which areas are more specifically shown oudined in red on that map on file with the Office of the City Clerk of The City of San Diego as Document No. 740061. (Added 5+48 by (m. 3727 NS.) (,mended 5-14-64 by Ord. 9016 NS.) Ansceded 5.50.72 by Ord. 10843 NS.) (Ameeeed 5478 by Ord. 12307 NS.) Ordinances ORDINANCE NO. /65g.73/1 An Ordinance amending Subparagraphs (c) and (d). Subdivision 2, Subsection B of Section 63.44 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to authorize a pilot dog exercise and training acea in Laurel Canyon Pack. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOk$: Section 1. Subparagraphs (c) and (d) of Sub- • division 2 of Subsection B of Section 63.44 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code are hereby amended to read in their entirety as follows: (c) Dogs which have been specially trained and ace being used by blind persons to aid and guide them in their movements; or • (d) Dogs or cats when led by a leash not more than six (6) feet long, or when confined within the interior of a vehicle, or dogs under•the control of competent persons on designated dog exercise and training areas 'at: • 1. Laurel Canyon Park from dawn to 9:00 a.m. and from 4:00 p.m. until park closing every day of the week; and 2. Areas in City parks designated for that purpose by the Board of Recreation and Park Commissioners and approved by the City Council by ordinance. Sec. 2. Sub -subparagraph 1 of Subparagraph (d) of Subdivision 2 of Subsection B of Section 63.44 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code shall be deemed to have been repealed on March 1, 1989, and effective on said date Sub -subparagraph 2 thereof shall be renumbered as Sub -subparagraph 1. • Sec. 31 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in some daily newspaper printed and published in the City of Los Angeles. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was passed by the Council of the City of Los Angeles, at its meeting of JUL 1 2 W.08 GLIAS MARTINEZ, City Clerk. By �bL�i:ll is ` i *� �✓ L r:dl�— Deputy. JUL 141988 Approved File Net aa_nc. ..:.,.,.•..1 ,/./✓: J r. irmat alid fV los s u W...N. fustian 1. NAME l LAST ANO 1,1RST / 4.; 40 t ;. Lz o 4.p 2. AGE i1rT_ -••••Z 3. ADDRESS ($TRAIT 440 N0.1 (CITY) 4. PHONE NO. OF VICTIM 5. REPORTED BY 6. PNONE NO. OF REPORTER 8.OATE A HOUR BITTEN 11.1101V BITE OCCUartEO 9. AOORESS VNERE BITTEN (STREET AMO NO.) 1 TYPE 0 PROVOKED J VICIOU PLAYFUL. ❑ SICK ❑ UNKNOWN 0 OTHER: C�1 t 4 L`:t(e l - I`ar Ca.•* .twin Tv `44`1p WS. Q•. y1�� Tree0' n• Wawnd 12. DATE TREATEO 13.TREATEO BY 14. PHONE NO. lam`` • o "; .`-. �0 S. Q (Y‘.4..3. �•a.`.. �.." `S-7 + Soak- iT >,p.,, tC7 �re.�. i V 'alis - M..:.�--L-- � J �1-r\.. ,e _ 4 , s .. . ANIMAL C.A4)\\% 16. TYPE OF TREATMENT GIVEN INowt. 11 1den,1- Beatlen 32. OWNER 33. ADDRESS 1 T AN0 raj (CITY 1 3< . PNONE NO. 3S.TY7C OF ANIMAL 37. DESCRIPTION OF ANIMAL `31':Vgt'UPI .J OOG 2.❑CAT 3.❑OTHER Ree..,ke CIC REPORT TAKEN BYS DATE & TIME (THIS FORM TO BE USED ONLY BY AGENCIES OTHER THAN THE PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAMS) H-1761 (REV. 6-73) 76A89 P53-83 • 77E7 ; ICT TI• tY. • • • • _ 11 11_ _-... • :w , s . .17,•*, • Nor I1.nti. fieation 32.OWNER lel V, C y 34. PHONE NO. 1 3 7 y-(9166 37. DESCRIPTION OF ANIMAL 7. ANIMAL • . . 33 -ADDRESS (STREET AND 110.) 3s� a�Irt•3i .TYP OF ANIMAL . _ 1. [E]...1700 2.❑CAT 3.❑OTHER Go'I 4 PP U 39. DATE VACCINATED 40. VACCINE .1^ H ct C( eCHICK EMBRYO DPHENOLIZEDTISSUE 42.DATE & HOUR QUARANTINE CARO POSTED 43. INVESTIGATOR f 45. I have received the quarantine notice and understand the quarantine regulations : • • ' 31. POUND NO • SPECIFYI (CITY I 36. DISTRICT 38. WAS DOG VACCINATED? 1. lYES 2. ❑ NO NOT VERIFIED 41. VETERINARIAN • • • : Remarks '-aboratory 0 NOT SEEN IQ- •4F\v.�..... .l'% - • 0.S Reiease 50. LABORATORY REPORT 0 NONE 0POS. NEG. 51. DATE 53.1 certify that this animal has been under my observation for five . days, and there are no clinical signs or symptoms of any disease. 56. DISPOSITION .. .. 1 0 RELEASED 0 DIED J DESTROYED 0 NOT LOCATED 59. GATE CASE CLOSED 60. INVESTIGATOR'S SIGNATURE 52. LABORATORY 0 CENTRAL 0 54. SIGNATURE OF O.V.M. OTHER (SPECIFY / 55. DATE 57. DATE T m z crs O z m 158. FINAL DIAGNOSIS -I 0 RABIES 0 NOT RABIES Z IRlMAL BITE REPORT • IMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES •V TY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES 61. DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER ,r •"7 • CASE NO. TO: DISTRIC" •,�, 4 • a�iC el« PERSON BITTEN Jld.mti- - flostioe .-.%i 1. NAME (LAST ANO FIRST) ,' - `. • ..:4A'RvE(i' ..... 2. AGE tq 3. ADDRESS. (STREET ANO NO.) .' - .. :• (CITY) (3L 5 va)t;.Nc�Es AVE. Ni :5. 4. PHONE NO. OF VIC IM • 3"72-55$71AMM'1 5. REPORTED BY . 1.1evvA1Z. 6. PHONE NO. OF REPORTER SIS -3827 7. DISTRICT s; - :,,,:,,ti . : Y: ,„?.i tq ,; lila-111.g)%❑ /tt•J. 8. DATE & HOUR BITTEN (=28.83 X .30 9. ADDRESS ( STREET AND NO.) L.ONGF Ec.tow ft ARZDMORE !-t t3. 10. BODY LOCATION, EXTENT & T.x f OF INJURY 2 V'i NGS ON AND. • . - 11. HOW BITE OCCURRED ; l• . _ , .. MQ,�` t✓ n (Z•e5 rzc*=lr 0 PLAYFUL ❑ SICK ❑ UNKNOWN 0 OTHER : . • ... ''. .. PROVOKED E VICIOUS- • -� • yrs w.f.,,,r.• � ,•• �''•; i•, 'in,' talent At. of ound S•.:.:�.• - i2.DATE TREATE_D '' tk. y.]•`�,%rt0.', ,,,' 13 TREATED BY., ..,,;.„-.1,4,.:, r i.. ' -61 :f �1 fi (L4q'k s... 17 • 14 PHONE NO.15• .0 PATIENT CONTACTED REGARDING TREATMENT ,,S 'w •. . •A.•.`D• ATE v «•i:.:.e+ it: •`-:l..r.: .•INITIAL• ..•M: ♦':F+�.4 •.. 16 TYPE OF TREATMENT GIVEN (NONE, if NOT TREATED) s •�+ 4 r` ..a` a` ., ., . w ';;:rd4...:_, -;';J:!: � '•�' : 3t: ^� a.< A ti• - Rabies irestmrnte 17.ANTI-RABIESTREATMENT ,RECOMMENDED . �. ,: YES NO 18. RECOMMENDED BY (OHO OR PHYS) • • .� •Ry,,.p _ ` :..i •ems. t4, ��A . •,: 19. PHONE NO. • J:., •• 20 NO. OF DOSES . , •r �G �/(4140I':;',:,4 21. REFERRED TO • 1 • . .7.111,...)//1/4�"� 22• NO. OF ES GIVEN 23 GIVEN BY- (o o PHYs) - •. 24. PHONE NO. ._. 25. O PATIENT REFUSES ANTI• RABIES TREATMENT. i' 1 1.i � . 26. DATE IIOURRECEIVED •. N�R 27 RECEIVED BY _ NSA w 28. DATE&HOURASSIGNEO OA; 29.ASSIG ED TO ........ . .. N A .'•`:. , 30 REMA KS: -ANIMAL• jM1 • • 31-P01010140 32.ON:} 33.AOORESS (STREET ANO NO.) . Ti!WER LIoR 3a �lf!-Id NIP P4 -•G1 z 'Dw.t w v� • , M 34. -PHONE NO. 376:. 7oa 35. TYPE OF ANIMAL • • , '•1.', DOG 2.QCAT 3.DOTHER 37. DESCRIPTION OF ANIMAL . T:SODL TeRR.i 2Nix l? ?ALK 40. VACCINE'�.'.'':.:.; ; ......0 CHJCK Emmy.° .•QPHENOLIZEO TISSUE 39. DATE VACCINATED 42 DATE & HOUR QUARANTINE CARD POSTED • 43. INVESTIGATOR • ,•EJB. rid.; : .._tpuoran• ta'tine •c• 48. OATES OF REVISITS AND CONDITION OF ANIMAL '.• QOK ❑OK 0 O Remarks SPECT/Y) (CITY GT, • 36. DISTRICT 38. WAS 006 VACCINATED? 1. KYES .• 2. a NO 3. a NOT VERIFIEI 41. VETERINARIAN . Ptd ANIMAL- PI'ffiL. 44. CONDITION OF ANIMAL • 45••:1.have received the quarantine notice and understand the quarantine regulations : 46. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CUSTODIAN El OK 47. DATE & HOUR 0 NOT SEEN 49...''• • .. f 0 rn m z 0 Laboratory 50. LABORATORY REPORT 0 NONE El POS. NEG. 51. DATE 52. LABORATORY 0 CENTRAL 0 OTHER (SPECIIYI 53. 1 certify that this animal has been under my observation for five days, and there are no clinical signs or symptoms of any disease 54. SIGNATURE OF D.V.M. 55. DATE 56..DISPOSITION El RELEASED DIED D DESTROYED D NOT LOCATED 57. DATE 58. FINAL DIAGNOSIS 0 RABIES El NOT RABIES 59. DATE CASE CLOSED 60. INVESTIGATOR'S SIGNATURE 61. DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER ANIMAL BITE REPORT COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES • COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES H•1759 rl•Ts1 it) Non m co co 0 z m -1 -1 m z r 1 m m cAse-No. TO: DISTRICT' ..•••• .• --•sl.'•-•‘!cPc.Loc: ' • • . . • . . . • • ' *•• • ..• . • • il • IV PERSON BITTEN N • • .,•••:•ti•;::!.it. '-•Ideatl- fico7177:7 • „ ... 4 . ... •:.---••_ i• NAME ( LAST ANO FIRST) • ::.: . . .• (... L ,•'-r . ' ' • Nliz.ay... ..."r3. I . - • 2. AGE .31 3. ADDRESS-.,;(.symEtplio7.4 .- • •,..,... (CITT)..,,....;, 64,5 ' • I/ f':‘..".•••S /'• ' 4. PHONE NO. OF CTIM .. 3 76_ ) 2 2 8 S. REPORTED BY - . ; .... • • .; ,. ..... 7...,:. . , .. . • • Z , Lc . 'T k i .2 "i -/ ';:-. 6. PHONE NO. OF REPORTER 3 74.. /2z ,9 .-i- 7. DISTRICT, ...., ;•,...,..,,itp . ' . ...:,-...... ,..''. . . ....,.„,,..., : .. -;.••=;;;V:,:v. '-•":#"7••••'•*•,' •'71g;lurY .0,1.14:•^4..•..V:. 8. DATE & HOUR BITTEN 4.143,, 03 02)00 9. ADDREA 1 STREET ANO NO.) - .., 1/,.- 4. A 20 )-Y) ore, c- 10. BODY LOCATION, EXTENT & TYPE OF INJURY ........t . :.-....„,..; '?.6 el I ) hi /1213(d --AP4/6C4.• 11, HOW BITE OCCURRED ••‘,..:- • .' • • " •-• . • •••• •;' ':".c"':• .",•,• ;•'-::•.4:.••14C.tA•*-•:•:.'"; CEtkOTHER : .1./N/1 14 ac 0 * ' •:-'-' ; . • • • . . - ..::- --• - • PROVOKED • VICIOUS 0 PLAYFUL • SICK • UNKNOWN .,". .• . • • i .,..'....,,......„.....,... ' . • . ,,........ i . . . ' •.:. .. ' . .... i.. • , . , :k..., .:...4...,,,....;.%'..= '' 7i.:,....7.:..",':?.. • .• ...+7..' t•:74. 4...''''' :•::',...1.'",:= . , ••' ' .1. .. . i...!..;..`•..A. • .....4 ..!....1.i.!4;..1=1`4•1=';', •••• ''. DO 41 '' . :i'l • T . Zy' ..... CA R. -IR • 0 "7" C " )•-•1C C p - A x) • Pr, /4 C Treatment ' el Wund . •-•:.••••::"..."'4.!' 127, DATE TREATED , • 'S/••'. 8" 81 - 13. TREATED BY ..,.. ,..i.,. • • 5.,G t C. , ; • : .s.' :' * ' ' ' ; .. ; * ' 14. PHONE NO. . .• . . ' ' 7 . : • " • • ' . 15. • PATIENT CONTACTED REGARDING TREATMENT.,V.":', INITIAL • ' • • . . DATE ....iii';',-:,- 16. TYPE OF. TREATMENT GI VEt4•(NONE. sr NOT TREATED) . . - . . . _ ;,... „ ..i, ...,-• *.! • - '....:.;,..::„: 7..,•:.,•. •,.. ••• .•••:".:,:•••;i::•:".4,yr.4:4 " . ,- • • ' 1 ,e le, ,• • •,, b'.:4'....... - :-•i ........'.'. ' . ;":1.2...:''''' . '''''• C 4,C--tee.t.j VD. ••••••"'•7 1•Av:4 . . ......e...7,,s .:" - • 'n ' Anti-. rreattnents 17. ANTIOIABIES TREATMENT ••••.. RECOMMENDED • 4';'"'.. 0 YES 18. RECOMMENDED BY (OHO OR etym.) ,,0(.:!44e•i.''.•`:4 '. . •• • • 19. PHONE NO. .....„. ' •• • ••••:. ..'"i•••.1::;: 20. NO. OF DOSES , ! ..'" . :,6'34'sle' •,4-.. -0. • ' .=•:•'',.1",, .-`'...+1. 21. REF.ERRED:rp .. ..,.....,,,,,..,,......,,,.......,-.1 4,-,Z,Q,4&'&:*•:4-2t$,e?t:ik:rtl:t.',.j: . - - . s .'s.- -4. - --5wAt• ••• ' - .: --0!, 22.Ralalles- NO. OF DOSES GIVEN . 23. GIVEN Br ( ONO OR PHTS.) ' ' , .. .'... , . . 24. PHONE NO. • '. ,.;,, •Z:V.! ••.. • • , e„ -i-.): , • !- '4 25• • ' PATIENT RABIES REFUSES ANTI- TREATMENT....., • .- .. . ef • • ; -....u.)......,-; • Misc.. 26.DATE &FOUR RECEIVED . • ' '-, , . 27. RECEIVED BY. , ,. • . . • -,... • - : • . • ' ' '• ''... .. -. - 7.8.DATE & HOUR ASSIGNED : : ` :-,.%`:, - %. ''''•• • . 29•ASsIGNED TO.. •‘.. ..i. ,,,,, ,..., ii,;;.,_',..:).,•; •• . . - . .•.:•:•:::'.::.:Filr.' .• , ...:,' ;:•'. 7 ;•'! • 'V:. • • • • • •• •`...• • ......? . '.!-,•:•: -4... '14 ‘.)s p .. -- ..: ; 054. 0-.'S-VCsArwm_. '-‘... .•<,) C-. "'"I A k a ‘.., ,..‘="rej etzoni s- 0 i .4 ./4.../ I v...-, s. (. - ••• ''''''' - .-- • . ... -- - ..".r.c. 2c, lee 14 }-1 i c) ( • ; 6444,•SiOct. •*" :4 :24. . .0" ••::•11.....• • • ,•••• • •• '••• • • • • • • -ANIMAL- .. • • 31. POUND NO • • 40-. - 32. OWNER• ••::.- ". • • 33. ADDRESS (STREET ANO NO.) • 4.. (CITY • •.= '1„;.;„ 34. PHONE NO. . 35. TYPE,F ANIMAL • .---..1. Pa DOG 2. 0 CAT 3. 0 OTHER spectre') 36.DISTRICT, ; ; • 4. 37. DESCRIPTION OF ANIMAL " VVN C, A 1140A 1-4 A A 38. WAS DOG VACCINATED? •••!.• • -1. CI YES •: 2. ONO • •.;; NOT VERIFIED 39. DATE VACCINATED 40. VACCINE •• • • ,. • ' 0 CHICK EMBRYO OPHENOLIZED TISSUE 41. VETERINARIAN , „ ;•• ; • • , ; .s. . 42.OATE & HOUR QUARANTINE, CARD POSTED • • 43. INVESTIGATOR 44. CONDITION OF ANIMAL . . 45,'• 1 hove received the quarantine notice and ...,'understand the quarantine regulations : 46. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CUSTODIAN , • • •-• • ' . . 47. DATE &HOUR ,.• '••• • • 1..! 48. OATES OF REVISITS AND CONDITION OF ANIMAL 0 OK OK ..:::1•••-••;•:- OK El OK • • :• "• •••-•::. 0 NOT SEEN ; . "•• • ' • •••. ••••• ..„ t .?• •• • • • . • •••.• 1.• • .i•••• • •••••. •,•••.tr Remarks Laboratory • Release • ' `•• • i(i.ge 49.. , . • • • :••.; • : •••• T.'7 • .•••` • •;:•• • • • •••', z•-» •• • . • • 3SY •. • •Z • ‘••••:„.-, •••••••‘.:••••••7:; Cs: ',V. • 50. LABORATORY REPORT „ • . • 0 NONE • POS. ' NEG. 51. DATE 52. LABORATORY 0 CENTRAL 0 OTHER ISPECIrY) 53*1 certify that this animal has been under my observation for five /days, and there are no clinical signs or symptoms of any disease. 54. SIGNATURE OF 0.V.M. 56-01SPOSIT19N • • • •• • :.0 RELEASED • E3 DIED 0 DESTROYED. 0 NOT LOCATED 57. DATE • • • • of.; • • : , t • 55. DATE 58. FINAL. DIAGNOSIS 0 RABIES 0 NOT RABIES 59. DATE CASE CLOSED 60. INVESTIGATOR'S SIGNATURE 61. DISTRICT HEALTHOFFICER .* • 7, %:". "•:;; ';• • . • • , • ANIMAL BITE REPORT COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ' . •.'..•• • • COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES ot-tase (1.711 • ; •• •-t • •2 ;';'• • , •• : • ITT co 0 z -4 -4 m z (s) m .• .• February 21, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council February 28, 1989 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 88-23 AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO DELETE ZERO LOT SIDE YARD SETBACK PROVISION IN R -2B ZONES LOCATION: CITY WIDE -- R -2B ZONES INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Ordinance deleting a portion of Section 551 of the Zoning Code regarding zero side yard setbacks in the R -2B zone and adopting an Environmental Negative Declaration. Abstract The elimination of zero lot lines in the R -2B zone will require side yard setbacks to be consistent with other residential zones, i.e., 10% of the lot width, minimum 3'- maximum 5'. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of January 17, 1989, recommended adoption of the attached Ordinance. The Staff Review Committee, at their meeting of December 8, 1988, recommended a Negative Declaration for the proposed Text Amendment. Analysis Analysis is provided in the attached Planning Commission staff report of January 17, 1989. INCUR : Michael Schubach Planning Director ,moi? even B. Northgraft City Manager a/pcsrzero Resp= u 1 bmitted, - Associate 'annex s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 89 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DELETING A PROTION OF SECTION 551 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING ZERO SIDE YARD SETBACKS WITHIN R -2B ZONES AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing on February 28, 1989, and made the following Findings: A. Section 551 of the Zoning Ordinance includes an exception which allows for a dwelling in a R -2B zone to be constructed to the side yard property line when an agreement is obtained from the adjacent neighor; B. All other residential zones do not provide for any exception to a minimum side yard equal to 10% of the width of the lot, with a three foot minimum, and five foot maximum; Z- o sid- and setba work well f• new sub visions, of for •ts pre develope.• D. This Ordinance will bring side yard setbacks into consistency for all residential zones; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordian as follows: 1. Delete the following paragraph of Section 551 regarding side yards for R -2B zones: "Exception: with the recorded agreement of the owners of adjoining property and provided no violation of the Building Code will result, one (1) side yard may be reduced to zero (0) feet where the remaining side yard is at least five feet in width." 2. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a completed building permit package of file with the City prior to February 28, 1989. Said package must include a completed building permit application form, completed conceptual plans (plot plan, floor plans, elevation plans and similar plans) and a lot survey. Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a diligent manner and must be issued a building permit within six months of the effective date of this Ordinance. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 15 16 1 3. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after it's final passage and adoption. 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of it's adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original Ordinances of said City, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: PPROVED TO FORM: CITY CLERK /perszero 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 c c RESOLUTION P.C. 89-6 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DELETING A PORTION OF SECTION 551 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING ZERO SIDE YARD SETBACKS WITHIN R -2B ZONES AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 17, 1989 and made the following Findings: A. Section 551 of the Zoning Ordinance includes an exception which allows for a dwelling in a R -2B zone to be constructed to the side yard property line when an agreement is obtained from the adjacent neighbor; B. All other residential zones do not provide for any exception to a minimum side yard equal to 10% of the width of the lot, with a three foot minimum, and five foot maximum; C. Zero side yard setbacks work 'well for new subdivisions, not for lots previously developed; D. The proposed amendment will bring side yard setbacks into consistency for all residential properties; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby recommend amending the Zoning Ordinance by deleting the following: 1. Delete the following paragraph of Section 551 regarding side yards for R -2B zones: "Exception: with the recorded agreement of the owners of adjoining property and provided no violation of the building code will result, one (1) side yard may be reduced to zero (0) feet where the remaining side yard is at least five (5) feet in width." VOTE: AYES: Comms.Edwards,Ingell,Ketz,Rue,Chmn.Peirce NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CONTINUED -- Resolution P.C. 89-6 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 89-6 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at thier regular meeting of January 17, 1989 Jas Pierce, Chairman Mic ael S hu•ach, Secretary Date A/perszero • 5- C January 5, 1989 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission January 17, 1989 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 88-23 AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO DELETE ZERO SIDE YARD SETBACK PROVISION IN R -2B ZONES LOCATION: CITY WIDE -- R -2B ZONES INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution recommending deleting a portion of Section 551 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding zero side yard setbacks in the R -2B zone and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration. Background The Staff Review Committee, at their meeting of December 8, 1988, recommended that the Planning Commission approve a Negative Declaration for the proposed text amendment. Analysis The Zoning Ordinance presently has a provision within the R -2B development standards which allows no side yard setback on one side yard if an agreement with the adjoining property owner is recorded. Said exception must also be in compliance with Building Codes and also requires the remaining side yard to be a minimum of five feet (5') . With the exception of the R -2B zone, all other residentially zoned parcels require a minimum setback of 10% of the width of the lot, three foot minimum, five foot maximum. The proposed text amendment will bring R -2B setbacks into consistency with other residential sideyard setbacks. Setbacks have been created to provide less lot coverage and more light, air, and ventilation. The zero setback concept was intended to increase one side yard to a size that was usable on each lot of a subdivision, i.e., each dwelling in a row would have, for instance, one ten foot wide setback on one side instead of a five foot setback on each side. It should be noted that the City's Zoning Ordinance has been written in such a way that the result could be that a dwelling unit has only a five foot setback on one side and no setback on the other side, and the adjacent dwelling could butt against the dwelling with a two hour fire wall. 6_ c c Since the adoption of the zero side yard provision, there has been no project which has utilized the provision. The reason is probably that it does not work well on individual developments, but instead on tract developments where entire blocks are developed at one time. A property owner must obtain a "recorded agreement of the owners of the adjoining property" which would result in the adjacent owner having to either provide larger setbacks on his property to meet the Building Code, or build a dwelling with a side wall with no openings and two hour fire constructed. If the adjacent lot is already developed, the possibility of meeting the requirements would be highly unlikely. The elimination of the zero side yard setbacks is important since several areas have recently been rezoned to R -2B, therefore, these development standards affect a large ber � parcels. Planning Director Attachments 1. Resolution 89-6 2. Staff Review Minutes of 12/8/88 a/pcsrzero 7 AnP- -a Associate lanner 4 TEXT AMENDMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO ELIMINATE ZERO LOT LINE IN THE R -2B ZONE • Mr.. Schubach gave staff report dated January 5, 1989. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the proposed resolution recommending deleting a portion pf • Section 551 of the zoning ordinance regarding zero sideyard setbacks in the R -2B zone and to adopt an environmental negative declaration. The zoning ordinance presently has a provision' within the R -2B development standards which allows no side yard setback on one side yard if an agreement with the adjoining property owner is recorded. Said exception must also be in compliance with building codes and also requires the remaining side yard to be a minimum of five feet. With the exception of the R-28 zone, all other residentially zoned parcels require a minimuth setback of 10 percent of the width of the lot, three foot minimum, five foot maximum. The proposed text amendment will bring R -2B setbacks into consistency with other residential side yard setbacks. • Setbacks have been created to provide less lot coverage and more light, air, and ventilation. The zero setback concept was intended to increase one side yard to a size that was usable on each lot of a subdivision; that is, each dwelling in a row would have, for instance, one ten -foot wide setback on one side instead of a five-foot setback on each side. It should be noted that the City's zoning ordinance has been written in such a way that the result could be that a dwelling unit has only a five-foot setback on one side and no setback on the other side, and the adjacent dwelling could butt against the dwelling with a two-hour fire wall. Since the adoption of the zero side yard provision, there has been no project which has utilized the provision. The reason is probably that it does not work well on individual developments, but instead on tract developments where entire blocks are developed at one time. A property owner must obtain a "recorded agreement of the owners of the adjoining property" which would result in the adjacent owner having to either provide larger setbacks on his property to meet the building code, or build a dwelling with a side wall with no openings and two-hour fire construction. If the adjacent lot is already developed, the possibility of meeting the requirements would be highly unlikely. P.C. Minutes 1/17/89 The elimination of the zero side yard setbacks is important since several areas have recently been rezoned to R -2B; therefore, these development standards affect a large number of parcels. Public Hearing opened and closed at 9:40 P.M. by Chmn. Peirce, who noted that no one appeared to address this issue. Chmn. Peirce suggested that the staff recommendation be approved. MOTION by Chmn. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Inge11, to approve staff's recommendation, Resolution P.C. 89-6. AYES: ' Comms. Edwards, Inge11, Ketz, Rue, Chmn. Peirce NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Recess taken from 9:41 P.M. until 9:53 P.M. ct P.C. Minutes 1/17/89 c � i v 1 PROJECT SS 88-23 TEXT AMENDMENT TO ELMINIATE ZERO LOT LINE IN R -2B ZONE. Mr. Perea explained that presently the zoning code allows a zero lot line when consent from the adjacent neighbor is obtained. The propsed amendment will elminate the zero lot line provision and require the standard 10% of the width of the lot for sideyards. Motion by Mr. Perea to recommend a negative declaration, second by Mr. Grove. No objection, so ordered. 14 (D sk-Qlg X M //a/k8 Honorable Mayor and Members February 22, 1989 City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of February 28, 1989 MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 1988-89 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the revisions to estimated revenue, appropriations and budget transfers as presented in the "City of Hermosa Beach Midyear Budget Summary 1988-89" attached as Exhibit A. It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the report on midyear review with supporting documents and the report on the status of capital improvement projects as of midyear. It is also recommended that the City Council approve the policy change for expenditure of funds from the Asset Forfeiture Fund as reflected in Exhibit B. Exhibit C is the original policy. Background The City has conducted Midyear Budget Reviews 1981-82. The review is a good tool to ensure estimates originally used remain realistic as Analysis every year since that assumptions and the year progresses. Revenue General Fund revenue is estimated to increase over original estimates by $609,583, or 5% after adjusting for one time asset sales and UUT no longer in the General Fund. The proceeds from the auction of the property at Gould/PCH constitute the major portion of this amount ($391,459 = 3.2%) since the amount was not estimated in the original budget. Other notable changes are: SOURCE Secured Property Tax Sales Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Exhibit 1 lists all explanations of the INCREASE (DECREASE) $173,751 (61, 695) 30,209 of the revised reasoning. County levy increased 11% as a re- sult of tunrover/market conditions. Reduction based on 1st half collections which were 3% over 87/88 rather than original 7% assumed. Pavilion benefit will likely be 89-90. 1st half receipts up 29% Removal of permanent resident deduction. Assumed conservative 2nd half comparable to 87-88 revenue estimates with brief 1 f 41 Appropriations Proposed mid -year appropriations in the General Fund total $181,682, and are summarized in Exhibit 2 with other more detailed exhibits attached. $203,912 was reappropriated by City Council in July from the previous year for projects and purchases not complete. These funds would be coming from the prior year fund balance. The remaining adjustments were made by the City Council since July 1, primarily for capital projects. All adjustments since the June, 1988 approval (printed budget) total $405,631. Transfers The General Fund Transfer decreases by $10,505 due to decreased net income in the Parking Fund and by $998 from the Asset Forfeiture Fund since actual purchases were less than amounts budgeted. The left over funds return to the Asset Forfeiture Fund. Less funds are available ($8,300) in the Revenue Sharing Fund so CIP 160, Concrete Street Repairs is being adjusted since funds are not needed now anyway. A summary of transfers is included as Exhibit 10. Fund Balance The General Fund fund balance for 6/30/88, as reported in the audit report and the report by staff, increased by 22% over 86-87. The beginning fund balance used in the original budget was $1,618,654 as compared to the actual $2,258,349 or an increase of $639,695. An updated fund balance was given to City Council in June for informa- tion. The ending fund balance for 6/30/89 as of Midyear is estimated at $2,215,652 as compared to the original budget at $1,405,510. With funds available from revenue and transfers in of $9,483,588, and appropriations and transfers out of $9,536,285, only $45,697 is taken from the fund balance, even though capital expenditures and CIP's in the General Fund total $1,011,952. Of the $2,215,652 fund balance, it is recommended that the City Council consider transferring the $200,000 Designation for Open Space from the General Fund to the WT Right Of Way Fund. Seaview Proceeds (less legal expenses of $100,000) are recommended to be designated separately in the General Fund reserve for possible loan to purchase the Right of Way/Greenbelt. These funds are a result of litigation to recovery revenues that were to accrue to the General Fund but did not. Reserving the funds for the Greenbelt purchase will help us complete the purchase and reduce the cost of financing. 2 1 With a fund balance of $2,215,652 designations recommended would be: Designations Asset Replacement $120,000 Capital Improvements 443,165 Open Space (to be transferred to UUT R -O -W fund) 200,000 Affordable Housing 46,831 Seaview Proceeds 290,000 Contingency 915,656 Litigation 200,000 $2,215,652 Funds appropriated by Council from the Capital Improvement Designation since July are being restored to the original budget amount. The Contigency account less the Seaview Proceeds (excluding legal) would represent $914,197 or 12% of revenue. Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund The policy originally adopted provided for expenditures from the Police Department account in the General Fund. The revision allows for direct budgeting and expenditure from the Asset Forfeiture Fund which is easier to understand and less complex. Concur: w 4 /i evin B. Northcraft, Viki Copeland, City Manager Finance Administrator kir 4 Or Including Midyear Revenue Revisions ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovernmental/State Intergovernmental/County Intergovernmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/88 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget Capital Outlay Capital Improvements SUBTOTAL PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL FUNDS APPROPRIATED ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/89 *DESIGNATED FOR: ASSET REPLACEMENT $120,000 CAP IMPROVEMENTS $443,165 **RETAINED EARNINGS RESERVED AND FIXED ASSETS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MIDYEAR BUDGET SUMMARY 1988-89 GENERAL LIGHTING PARKING STATE GAS COUNTY GAS PARK REC FUND FUND FUND TAX FUND TAX FUND FAC TAX FUND $5,413,903 $266,970 $135,000 $332,960 $795,181 $5,000 $333,367 $469,786 $7,752,167 $1,731,421 $9,483,588 $2,258,349 $11,741,937 $8,260,839 $553,253 $458,699 $9,272,791 $253,494 $9,526,285 $2,215,652 $384,882 $82,000 $466,882 $3,309 $470,191 $1,235,168 $1,705,359 $324,799 $121,000 $445,799 $30,500 $476,299 * $1,229,060 OPEN SPACE AFFORD HSG Exhibit A $1,375,000 $135,000 $802,750 $100 $2,312,850 $12,249 $2,325,099 $1,254,885 $25,000 $267,637 $292,637 $101,829 $394,466 $315,772 $70,000 $2,000 $33,000 $175,000 $278,000 $278,000 $433,884 $2,000 $2,000 $34,119 $3,579,984 $0 $710,238 * $36,119 * $711,884 $849,008 $66,792 $623,988 $915,800 $623,988 $1,423,508 $86,250 $2,339,308 $710,238 $1,240,676 ** $0 $200,000 $ 46,831 $141,600 $0 $141,600 $141,600 $570,284 *** $36,119 CONTINGENCY $1,205,656 ***PROSPECT LITIGATION $200,000 PARK$50,000 • • • • J V • • u • ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovernmental/State Intergovernmental/County Intergovernmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/88 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget Capital Outlay Capital Improvements SUBTOTAL PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL FUNDS APPROPRIATED 1/4. ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/89 V !.r 1r 1r UUT RR RIGHT OF WAY FUND 6%UUT REV SHARING PROP A GRANT FUND FUND FUND FUND $777,627 $1,166,440 $226,009 $26,000 $3,000 $1,200 $16,000 3000 $11,550 $433,200 $803,627 $1,169,440 $1,200 $253,559 $436,200 • $1,106 $81,600 $803,627 $1,169,440 $1,200 $254,665 $517,800 $155,217 $29,557 $139,975 $23,241 $958,844 $1,169,440 $30,757 $394,640 $541,041 $242,703 $514,800 $0 $0 $0 $242,703 $514,800 $1,041,954 $30,700 $1,041,954 $30,700 $242,703 $514,800 $958,844 $127,486 $57 $151,937 $26,241 •J J • • J J V • • G1 • • • • 0 r• • n r • • n r. ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovernmental/State Intergovernmental/County Intergovernmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/88 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget Capital Outlay Capital Improvements SUBTOTAL PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL FUNDS APPROPRIATED ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/89 CR GRD FUND $78,691 $800 $79,491 $452 $79,943 $18,822 $98,765 $59,100 $59,100 $4,500 $63,600 $35,165 SEWER FUND ASSET FORF FIRE PROTECT INSURANCE FUND FUND FUND $82,000 $20,000 $3,600 $28,400 $114,000 $20,000 $803,481 $917,481 $20,000 $901,158 $240,700 $1,818,639 $260,700 $130,890 $10,059 $1,623,000 $1,763,949 $54,529 $1,818,478 $161 $64,882 $14,215 $79,097 $65,309 $144,406 $116,294 6000 $55,000 $124,000 $130,000 $59,700 $189,700 $29,792 $55,000 $195,597 $250,597 $598,122 $219,492 $848,719 $109.700 $729,847 $109,700 $729,847 $109,700 $729,847 $109,792 $118,872 TOTAL $8,117,552 $266,970 $1,510,000 $822,960 $1,062,818 $8,600 $433,200 $1,176,067 $768,886 $14,167,053 $2,990,744 $17,157,797 $7,668,761 $24,826,558 $10,771,768 $644,319 $3,483,087 $14,899,174 $2,990,744 $17,889,918 $6,936,640 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 GENERAL FUND FUND BALANCE 1983-1989 IMMMAIIIIIIMIIM IN THOUSANDS $2,215,652 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 OPERATING EXPENDITURES/FUND BALANCE 1983-1989 OPERATING FUND EXP BALANCE ---1 GENERAL FUND 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 IN THOUSANDS 1987-88 1988-89 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 REVENUE/FUND BALANCE TRENDS 1983-1989 REVENUE GENERAL FUND FUND BALANCE 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 IN THOUSANDS 1987-88 1988-89 " •_' • HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT ASSET SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE FUND R Eve PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the establishment of the Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund and the control and management of the funds in this account. POLICY: Assets seized by, or forfeited to, the City of Hermosa Beach Police Department are distributed according to Title 18 and 19 of the United States Code as well as Chapter 9 of the Health and Safety Code of California. These assets can only be used for law enforcement purposes and are intended to supplement, not replace or reduce, normal appropriations for the operation of the Department. A special fund, titled "Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund", shall'be established to record the receipts and disbursements of the seized and forfeited assets. A separate account, titled "Special Investigations", shall be established to record all expenditures necessary for the operation of a narcotics/vice investi- gation program. A budget for expenditures necessary for this program will be formulated in accordance with the established budgetary processes currently utilized in the City. Expenditures made from the Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund and/or the Special Investigations account will be made in accordance with the City's established purchase procedures. The City Treasurer may invest money from the fund in short or long term interest earning accounts in order to increase the amount of the fund. All interest earned from investments of money from the fund shall be credited to the fund. Non-cash assets seized and distributed to the Hermosa Beach Police Department will be recorded as fixed assets according to the City's established procedure. The use and method of disposition of seized non-cash assets will be subject to Council approval. Proceeds from the sale of seized non-cash assets.will be deposited into the Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund. A monthly financial report, showing all interest, expenditures and receipts from or to the fund will be submitted to the City Council each month by the Finance Department. PROCEDURE: All money received by the Police Department through United States Code 18 and 19, and Chapter 9 of the California Health and Safety Code will be deposited into the Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund. asset1 t'VUTRTT R • Non -money assets distributd to the Police Department will be appraised and will be recorded within the City's fixed asset system. the intent to retain or dispose of non -money assets will be submitted by the Director of Public Safety to the City Manager for approval within thirty days of receipt of such assets. In order to have funds available to serve as a "flash" roll to 'show' a suspected criminal that we have the money to purchase'illegal merchandise, the Treasurer will assure that there is a minimum of $20,000 available in the fund at all times. The amount of money necessary will be released to the Director of Public Safety, or other personnel authorized by the Director, by a check drawn on the fund. The Director of Public Safety is authorised to approve any amount, up to $20,000, for flash purposes, and will be responsible for the return of the money at the earliest possible time. Requests for amounts larger than $20,000 will be approved by the City Manager. The Finance Department and the Treasurer's office will expedite all such requests in order to facilitate crimi- nal investigations. In order to have funds readily available for the purpose of purchasing evidence such as narcotics and stolen merchandise, the Police Department shall maintain a cash account of $1,000. When expenditures are made from this account, the Director of Public Safety will submit a memo to the Finance Department showing the amount and purpose of the expenditure. On receipt, the Finance Department will reimburse the amount with a check to the Director of Public Safety, drawn on the Forfeiture Fund. 2 asset2 C;rti&i+��L HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT ASSET SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE FUND PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the establishment of the Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund and the control and management of the funds in this account. POLICY: Assets seized by, or forfeited to, the City of Hermosa Beach Police Department are distributed according to Title 18 and 19 of the United States Code as well as Chapter 9 of the Health and Safety Code of California. These assets can only be used for law enforcement purposes and are intended to supplement, not replace or reduce, normal appropriations for the operation of the Department. A separate fund titled "Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund" shall be established to record the receipts and disbursements of the seized and forfeited assets. The City Treasurer may invest money from the fund in short or long term interest earning accounts in order to increase the amount of the fund. All interest earned from investments of money from the fund shall be credited to the fund. Expenditures made from the Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund will be made in accordance with the City's established purchase procedures. Non-cash assets seized and distributed to the Hermosa Beach Police Department will be recorded as fixed assets according to the City's established procedure. The use and method of disposition of seized non-cash assets will be subject to Council approval. Proceeds from the sale of seized non-cash assets will be deposited into the Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund. A monthly financial report, showing all interest, expenditures and receipts from or to the fund will be submitted to the City Council each month by the Finance Department. PROCEDURE: All money received by the Police Department through United States Code 18 and 19, and Chapter 9 of the California Health and Safety Code will be deposited into the Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund. assetl • EXHIBIT C • •_ . ,, Expenditures made from the fund will be budgeted in the Police budget. An amount equal to the expenditures will be transfered from the fund to the General Fund on an as needed basis. Non -money assets distributd to the Police Department will be appraised and will be recorded within the City's fixed asset system. the intent to retain or dispose of non -money assets will be submitted by the Director of Public Safety to the City Manager for approval within thirty days of receipt of such assets. In order to have funds available to serve as a "flash" roll to 'show' a suspected criminal that we have the money to purchase'illegal merchandise, the Treasurer will assure that there is a minimum of $20,000 available in the fund at all times. The amount of money necessary will be released to the Director of Public Safety, or other personnel authorized by the Director, by a check drawn on the fund. The Director of Public Safety is authorised to approve any amount, up to $20,000, for flash purposes, and will be responsible for the return of the money at the earliest possible time. Requests for amounts larger than $20,000 will be approved by the City Manager. The Finance Department and the Treasurer's office will expedite all such requests in order to facilitate crimi- nal investigations. In order to have funds readily available for the purpose of purchasing evidence such as narcotics and stolen merchandise, the Police Department shall maintain a cash account of $1,000. When expenditures are made from this account, the Director of Public Safety will submit a memo to the Finance Department showing the amount and purpose of the expenditure. On receipt, the Finance Department will reimburse the amount with a check to the Director of Public Safety, drawn on the Forfeiture Fund. 2 asset2 GENERAL FUND Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 3102 Current Year Unsecured 3103 Prior Year Collections 3106 Supplemental Roll SB813 3107 Transfer Tax 3108 Sales Tax 3110 Cable TV Franchise 3111 Electric Franchise 3112 Gas Franchise 3113 Refuse Franchise 3114 Transient Occupancy 3115 Business License Licenses and Permits 3202 Dog Licenses 3203 Bicycle Licenses 3204 Building Permits 3205 Electric Permits 3206 Plumbing Permits 3207 Occupancy Permits 3209 Garage Sales 3210 Bingo Permits 3211 Banner Permits 3212 Animal /Fowl Permits 3213 Animal Redemption Fee 3214 Amplified Sound Permit Fines & Forfeitures 3301 Vehicle Code Violations 3303 Court Fines/Police Dept Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3402 Rents & Concessions 3403 Pier Revenue 3404 Comm Ctr Leases 3405 Comm Ctr Rentals 3406 Comm Ctr Theatre 3411 Other Facilities 3412 Tennis Courts Intergovernmental/State 3504 In Lieu Off Highway 3505 In Lieu Motor Vehicle 3507 Highway Sweeping 3509 Homeowner Prop Tx Relief 3510 Post 3511 Stc-Svc Off Training 3514 Cigarette Tax 3515 Supplemental Subvention 1988-89 MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW REVENUE WORKSHEET ESTIMATED REVENUE 12-31-88 MIDYEAR REVISION $2,151,336.00 $2,325,087.00 $167,136.00 $167,136.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $122,940.00 $122,940.00 $1,735,323.00 $1,673,628.00 $88,000.00 $96,138.00 $34,580.00 $34,580.00 $34,000.00 $34,000.00 $102.000.00 $107,000.00 $138,185.00 $168,394.00 $500,000.00 $475.000.00 $5,283,500.00 $5,413,903.00 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $200.00 $100.00 $160.000.00 $173,000.00 $38,000.00 $38.000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $6,000.00 $6.000.00 $65.00 $65.00 $200.00 $200.00 $1,000.00 $1,800.00 $150.00 $150.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $0.00 $155.00 $253.115.00 S266.970.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $35,000.00 $35.000.00 $135,000.00 $135,000.00 $104.000.00 $127,000.00 $6,900.00 $1,500.00 $9,960.00 $9,960.00 $68.000.00 $68,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $14,000.00 $14.000.00 $50,000.00 $50.000.00 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 $315,360.00 $332,960.00 $350.00 $350.00 $636,204.00 $636,204.00 $6,929.00 $4,000.00 $64,000.00 $64,000.00 $17,500.00 $17,500.00 $9,000.00 $8,500.00 $52,000.00 $52,000.00 $12,627.00 $12,627.00 $798,610.00 $795,181.00 INCREASE (DECREASE) $173,751.00 ($61,695.00) $8,138.00 $5,000.00 $30.209.00 ($25,000.00) $130,403.00 JUSTIFICATION COUNTY LEVY INCREASED 11% OVER 87-88. PREVIOUS EST ASSUMED 8% INCREASE OVER 87-88 BUDGET. 1ST HALF 3% OVER 87/88 1ST HALF 12% HIGHER THAN 87-88. RATE INCREASE MARCH'89 1ST HALF 12% HIGHER THAN 87-88 1ST HALF 29% OVER 87-88 SEVERAL VACANT AND UNOPENED BUSINESSES ($100.00) REMODEL INTERRUPTED BUSINESS $13,000.00 INCREASED BUILDING ACTIVITY $800.00 ADDT'L REVENUE EXPECTED CHAMBER FIESTA BILLING $155.00 PERMITS NOT ISSUED PREVIOUSLY S13.855.00 $23,000.00 1ST HALF ANNUALIZED ($5,400.00) LOSS OF RENTAL INCOME (SEAVIEW PROPERTY) $17,600.00 ($2,929.00) REDUCED SWEEPING DUE TO PCH/PIER CONSTRUCTION ($500.00) REALLOCATED STATE FUNDS ($3.429.00) .f Intergovernmental/County 3603 Recycling Feasibility Current Service Charges 3801 Residential Inspection 3802 Sign Review 3803 Environmental Impact 3806 Board of Appeals 3808 Zone Variance Review 3809 Tentative Map Review 3810 Final Map Review 3811 Zone Change Review 3812 Conditional Use Review 3813 Plan Check Fees 3814 Planning/Zoning Appeal 3815 Public Works Services 3816 Curb/Sidewalk Repair 3817 Special Curb Marking 3818 Police Services 3819 Jail Services 3820 Trusty Admin Fee 3821 Fingerprint Service 3823 Special Event Security 3824 Vehicle Inspection Fees 3825 Public Notice Posting 3827 Library Grounds Maint 3831 Street Cut Inspection 3834 Encroachment Permit 3836 Fumigation Inspect Fee 3837 Returned Check Charge 3838 Sale of Map/Publications 3839 Photocopy Charges 3840 Ambulance Transport 3841 Police Towing 3856 General Plan Amendment 3857 Parking Plan Application 3858 Tenant Refuse Billing 3859 Refuse Lien Fee 3860 Booting Release Fee 3861 Hazardous Matl Permit Other Revenue 3901 Sale of Real/Pers Property 3902 Refunds/Reimb Prev Yr 3903 Contributions Non Govt 3904 General Miscellaneous 3907 Foundation Contribution 3913 City Offices Recycling FUND TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE 12-31-88 MIDYEAR REVISION INCREASE (DECREASE) JUSTIFICATION $0.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 FUNDS/C0. SANITATION DIST $12,500.00 $700.00 $4,830.00 $675.00 $2.880.00 $3,600.00 $1,250.00 $1,800.00 $11,520.00 $105.000.00 $1,066.00 $12,000.00 $100.00 $300.00 $15,000.00 $28,000.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $20,000.00 $3,000.00 $40.00 $6,060.00 $19,200.00 $1,188.00 $7,500.00 $800.00 $400.00 $600.00 $8,000.00 $30,000.00 $450.00 $640.00 $400.00 $500.00 $10,000.00 $2.500.00 $316,999.00 $15,000.00 $700.00 $8,452.00 $375.00 $2,880.00 $5,400.00 $1,875.00 $1,800.00 $23,040.00 $127,000.00 $3.465.00 $6,000.00 $0.00 $300.00 $15,000.00 $7,735.00 $2,775.00 $3,000.00 $20,000.00 $3,000.00 $100.00 $6,060.00 $15,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $800.00 $1,500.00 $600.00 $8,000.00 $33,000.00 $1,350.00 $960.00 $200.00 $500.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 $333,367.00 $8,000.00 $397,186.00 $3,000.00 $43,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $1.000.00 $1,500.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $100.00 $40,000.00 $469,786.00 $7,142,584.00 $7,752,167.00 $2,500.00 INCREASED SALE ACTIVITY $3,622.00 ($300.00) $1,800.00 $625.00 $11,520.00 $22,000.00 $2,399.00 ($6,000.00) ($100.00) ADDT'L PROJECTS FEWER REQUESTS ADDT'L PROJECTS ADDT'L PROJECTS ADDT'L PROJECTS INCREASED BUILDING ACTIVITY ASSUMING FIVE MORE APPEALS ENCOURAGING PRIV SECTOR WORK CITY DOESN'T CHARGE FOR WORK ($20,265.00) REMODEL INTERRUPTED BUSINESS $1,275.00 REMODEL INTERRUPTED BUSINESS $60.00 BASED ON 1ST HALF ($4,200.00) $6,312.00 CITY FINAL PATCH DISCONTINUED NEW AGREEMENT, OUTDOOR DINING $1,100.00 BASED ON 1ST HALF $3,000.00 $900.00 $320.00 (200.00) BOOT RELEASE FEE IMPLMNTD ADDT'L PROJECTS .ADDT'L PROJECTS FEWER REQUESTS ($10,000.00) *INCL W ACCT#3841 $16,368.00 $389,186.00 $40,000.00 $500.00 $100.00 $429,786.00 $609,583.00 REFLECTS SEAVIEW PROCEEDS STATE WKRS COMP SETTLMNTS REFLECTS MISC REV REC'D NEW PROGRAM LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 3103 Prior Year Collections Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income FUND TOTAL PARKING FUND Fines & Forfeitures 3302 Court Fines/Parking Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3407 Parking Lot Rental 3409 Lot B 3413 VPD Lease Current Service Charges 3842 Parking Meters 3843 Parking Permits: Annual 3844 Daily Parking Permits 3845 VPD Lot Permits/Daily 3846 VPD Lot Permits/Monthly 3847 Validation Stamps 3848 Driveway Permits 3849 Guests Permits 3850 Contractor's Permits Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Prev Yr 3904 General Miscellaneous FUND TOTAL STATE GAS TAX FUND Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income Intergovernmental/State 3501 Section 2106 Allocation 3502 Section 2107 Allocation 3503 Section 2107.5 Allocation 3522 TDA Article 3 (SB821) FUND TOTAL COUNTY GAS TAX FUND Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income Intergovernmental/County 3601 County Aid to Cities ESTIMATED REVENUE 12-31-88 $357,882.00 $27,000.00 $384,882.00 $80,000.00 $464,882.00 MIDYEAR REVISION $357,882.00 $27,000.00 $384,882.00 $82,000.00 $466,882.00 $1,375,000.00 $1,375,000.00 $52,000.00 $30,000.00 $22,000.00 $65,000.00 $169,000.00 $580,000.00 $185,000.00 $2,500.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $5,000.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $785,500.00 $33,000.00 $15,000.00 $22,000.00 $65,000.00 $135,000.00 $580,000.00 $185,000.00 $2,500.00 $7,000.00 $10,000.00 $15,000.00 $250.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $802,750.00 INCREASE (DECREASE) JUSTIFICATION $2,000.00 1ST HALF ANNUALIZED $2,000.00 ($19,000.00) 1ST HALF ANNUALIZED ($15,000.00) LOSS OF VASEK/AMC LEASES ($34,000.00) $3,500.00 $3,000.00 $10,000.00 ($250.00) BASED ON 1ST HALF BASED ON 1ST HALF BASED ON 1ST HALF LESS ACTIVITY $1,000.00 MORE ACTIVITY $17,250.00 $0.00 $50.00 $50.00 REFLECTS MISC REVENUE $0.00 $50.00 $50.00 REFLECTS MISC REVENUE $0.00 $2,329,500.00 $44,000.00 $83,593.00 $174,848.00 $4,000.00 $5,196.00 $267.637.00 $311,637.00 $4.000.00 $15,000.00 $100.00 $2,312,850.00 $25,000.00 $83,593.00 $174,848.00 $4,000.00 $5,196.00 $267,637.00 $292,637.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $100.00 ($16,650.00) ($19,000.00) 1ST HALF ANNUALIZED ($19.000.00) ($2,000.00) 1ST HALF ANNUALIZED ($15,000.00) NO ELIGIBLE EXPENSES PARK & RECREATION FACTY FUND Taxes 3116 Park Rec Facility Tax Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3416 Oil Royalties ESTIMATED MIDYEAR INCREASE REVENUE REVISION (DECREASE) JUSTIFICATION 12-31-88 $70.000.00 $70,000.00 $24,000.00 $4,807.00 $28,807.00 Other Revenue 3910 Park/Recreation in Lieu $175,000.00 $33.000.00 $0.00 $33,000.00 $175,000.00 $9.000.00 1ST HALF ANNUALIZED ($4,807.00) OIL SPILL -WELLS CLOSED $4.193.00 FUND TOTAL $273,807.00 $278,000.00 $4,193.00 UUT RAILROAD R/W FUND Taxes 3120 Utility User Tax $777,627.00 $777,627.00 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income $42,000.00 $26.000.00 ($16,000.00) 1ST HALF ANNUALIZED FUND TOTAL $819,627.00 $803,627.00 ($16,000.00) 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND Taxes 3120 Utility User Tax $1,166.440.00 $1,166,440.00 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income $56,000.00 $3,000.00 ($53,000.00) 1ST HALF ANNUALIZED FUND TOTAL $1,222,440.00 $1,169,440.00 ($53,000.00) REVENUE SHARING FUND Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income $8,000.00 FUND TOTAL $8,000.00 PROPOSITION A' FUND Taxes 3117 Proposition A Transit 3121 Subregnl Incentive Funds $1,200.00 ($6.800.00) 1ST HALF ANNUALIZED $1,200.00 ($6,800.00) $189.587.00 $189,587.00 $36,422.00 $36,422.00 $226,009.00 Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income $12,000.00 Current Service Charges 3852 Fares ESEA $1.810.00 $0.00 3854 Fares Dial A Ride $8,050.00 $8,050.00 3855 Bus Passes $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $226,009.00 $16,000.00 $4,000.00 1ST HALF ANNUALIZED FUND TOTAL $13,360.00 $251.369.00 $11,550.00 $253,559.00 ($1,810.00) PROGRAM DISCONTINUED ($1,810.00) $2.190.00 GRANT FUND Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income Intergovernment/Federal 3701 Federal Aid Urban FUND TOTAL CROSSING GUARD FUND Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 3103 Prior Year Collections Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income FUND TOTAL SEWER FUND Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income Intergovernmental/County 3602 Beach Outlet Maintenance Current Service Charges 3828 Sewer Connection Fee 3829 Sewer Demolition Fee 3832 Sewer Lateral Installtn Other Revenue 3906 In Lieu Sewer Fee FUND TOTAL ASSETS SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND Fines & Forfeitures 3304 Forfeited Funds Use of Money and Property 3401 Interest Income FUND TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION FUND Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income Other Revenue 3912 Fire Flow Fee FUND TOTAL INSURANCE FUND Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income FUND TOTAL GRAND TOTALS ESTIMATED REVENUE 12-31-88 $0.00 $433,200.00 $433,200.00 $73.495.00 $5,196.00 $78,691.00 $0.00 $78,691.00 $48,000.00 $5.000.00 $30,000.00 $1.200.00 $6,000.00 $37,200.00 $25,000.00 $115,200.00 $0.00 $16,000.00 $16.000.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $13,559,937.00 MIDYEAR REVISION $2,000.00 $433,200.00 $435,200.00 $73,495.00 $5,196.00 $78,691.00 $800.00 $79,491.00 $82,000.00 $3,600.00 $25,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,400.00 $28,400.00 $0.00 $114.000.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $6.000.00 $124,000.00 $130,000.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00 INCREASE (DECREASE) JUSTIFICATION $2,000.00 1ST HALF ANNUALIZED $2,000.00 $800.00 1ST HALF ANNUALIZED $800.00 $34,000.00 1ST HALF ANNUALIZED ($1,400.00) OUTLET CLEANING COST LESS ($5.000.00) LESS DENSE DEVELOPMENT ($200.00) FEWER PERMITS ISSUED ($3,600.00) NO LONGER INSTALL LATERALS ($8,800.00) ($25,000.00) ($1.200.00) $4.000.00 $4.000.00 $6.000.00 $74,000.00 $80,000.00 $31,000.00 $31,000.00 $14.166.053.00 $606.116.00 NO ANTICIPATED REVENUE 1ST HALF ANNUALIZED INCREASED BUILDING ACTIVITY 1ST HALF ANNUALIZED 1988-89 MIDYEAR REVIEW SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS TO APPROPRIATIONS GENERAL FUND BILTMORE SITE COMMITTEE $2,000 GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS 2,000 PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES 30,000 BUILDING PLANNING PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 12,000 3,939 ADVERTISING, TELEVISING, COPYING FAX MACHINE, CITY HALL CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT, SEE EXHIBIT 3 FOR EXPENDI- TURES TO DATE ADDITIONAL FUNDS, HAZ- ARDOUS BUILDING MITIGA- ATION (EXHIBIT 4) COPYING, NOTICING 380 DESK, CHAIR FOR ADVANCED PLANNER (EXHIBIT 5) 700 2,000 COPIES, CASSETTES (EXHIBIT 5) DRAFTING TABLE 300 SECRETARY CHAIRS (EXHIBIT 6) TRAILER FOR CITY YARD, P.W. SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE (EXHIBIT 6) ENERGY CONVERSION (EXHIBIT 6) BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,000 TRAFFIC SAFETY STREET MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS CIP 177 FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS PIER/ VALLEY/ARDMORE INTERSECTION r 15,000 12,000 4,000 12,063 4,300 36,000 40.000 $181,682 EXHIBIT 2 SIGNS (EXHIBIT.6) AGGREGATE TRASH CONTAINERS (EXHIBIT 6) LEGAL APPEALS (EXHIBIT 7) TESTING INCREASES IN INSURANCE PREMIUMS APPROPRIATION OF PAVILION MITIGATION FEE FOR DESIGN WORK (EXHIBIT 8) STATE GAS TAX FUND CIP 171 ASPHALT STREET $ (3,814) PROJECT HAS NOT STARTED, REPAIRS $ 3,814 FUNDS TO BE BUDGETED NEXT FISCAL YEAR (EXHIBIT 6) REVENUE SHARING FUND CIP 160 CONCRETE STREET $ 8,300 REPAIRS $ 8,300 INSURANCE FUND WORKERS'S COMPENSATION $ 80,675 $ 5,791 LIABILITY ASSET/SEIZURE FUNDS REVENUE SHARING FUND BALANCE REVISED -FUNDS NOT NEEDED AT THIS TIME (EXHIBIT 6) WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIMS (EXHIBIT 7) ADMINISTRATOR CHANGE, CARRY-OVER CLAIM COST (EXHIBIT 7) ($213,289) UNUSED APPROPRIATION FOR PREMIUM (EXHIBIT 7) $ 20,000 ($106,823) $ 79,097 $ 79,097 EXHIBIT 2 TORT DEFENSE NARCOTICS UNIT PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES RECAP OF FUNDS USED 7/1/88 - 12/31/88 APPROPRIATION $400,000 OIL DRILLING CONSULTANT TELEPHONE MAINTENANCE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION FUNDING POLICE MOU TEAMSTERS MOU BILTMORE LEGAL EXPENSE STATE GRANTS CONSULTANT FIRE FLOW STUDY MULTI -USE CORRIDOR STUDY NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT PARK/RECREATION MASTER PLAN ANTICIPATED 25% SAVINGS ACCOUNT BALANCE EXHIBIT 3 5,000 5,460 10,200 188,761 109,711 3,487 7,500 9,700 19,200 7,000 25.000 $391,019 $ 10,000 $ (1,019) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Viki Copeland, Finance Administrator FROM: William Grove, Director of Building & Safety RE: Midyear Budget Review DATE: January 24, 1989 Attached to this memo, you will find a revenue worksheet with amended revenue estimates, where appropriate, for those fees collected by my department. I did review all accounts and where no amendment is proposed it is my belief that year end results will approximate original revenue estimates. The department will need an additional appropriation of $12,000.00 for the professional services account (001-400-4201-4201) to fund a hazardous building mitigation program consultant. The program is a state mandated program that must be initiated by 1990. I originally budgeted $3000.00 for this program; however I have received a proposal indicating the total cost to be approximately $15,000.00. The revised revenue projections should offset the impact of the additional appropriation requested. - 1 - EXHIBIT 4 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Viki Copeland, Finance Ad inistrator FROM: Michael Schubach,'P1ar Director i SUBJECT: Midyear Budget Review DATE: January 24, 1989 REVENUE Please refer to attached worksheet for revision of various revenue accounts. Please also note transit account number 145-0000-3852, labelled as Fares ESEA, which is no longer needed. ESEA is an abbreviation which does not represent any existing program. In addition, there is no ex- pected revenue for this account, the amount listed under estimated revenue is a carry over from the FY 87-88 budget. EXPENDITURE Please appropriate following expenditure accounts for the remaining 88- 89 fiscal year budget. Original Midyear Increase Account Appropriation Appropriation decrease Justification 001 4101-4305 $12,326.00 $16,265.00 +$3,939.00 Huge amount for copies for C.C. appeals, zone changes & lot mergers and increased volume of work in general over previous years (see attached revenue report for trend). Also, cost of public noticing for Biltmore SPA and other zone changes, etc. in- creased from previous year. 4101-5401 $1,200.00 $1,580.00 +$380.00 Need desk (approx. $200) 'and chair (approx. $180) for newly hired Advanced Planner. - 1 - EXHIBIT 5 4102-4305. $1,700.00 $2,400.00 +$700.00 More projects came in than expected with huge amount of staff report copies involved & cassettes needed. COMMENT We expect to be under budget with the requested additional appropria- •tions, but how much_is uncertain. 2 a CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: Viki Copeland, Finance Administrator FROM: Anthony Antich, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Request for Additional Appropriation Mid -year 88-89 DATE: February 14, 1989 Account No. Item & Reason Amount 4204 8' x 16' Trailer at City Yard for P. W. Superintendent $ 5,000 Explanation: Additional office space needed at City Yard 4202 Drafting table/desk combo $ 2,000 Explanation: To replace child's school desk table & and the department needs a drafting table. 4202 Secretary chairs (2) 5 leg Explanation: Need one to replace "table type" chair now in use and one to replace existing worn chair which cannot be adjusted. $ 300 4204 Energy conversion $15,000 Explanation: Additional capital outlay now will save money in the future as City changes to more energy efficient lights. 3104 Traffic safety signs $12,000 Explanation: FY 88-89 budget is 71% expended, while we are only 50% into fiscal year. 3103 12 forty gal. aggregrate $ 4,000 trash can containers Explanation: Replaces barrels broken by vandalism & accidents - continue to phase out the 55 -gallon metal drums. CIP 87-177 Hermosa Pavilion Mitigation Fee $40,000 Explanation: Council Action January 14, 1988 See copy of attached item and minutes. EXHIBIT 6 1 Viki Copeland, Finance Administrator Page 2. Request for Additional Appropriation Account No. CIP 85-160 Concrete Street Repairs CIP 85-171 Item & Reason Amount $39,000 originally appropriated <$8,300> from Revenue Sharing - of that amount, $8,300 is unavailable. • Project has not begun, so funds not needed at this time. Project for FY 88-89 has not started; hence, $3,814 can be returned to the State Gas Tax Fund balance. <$3,814> • GUARD HOUSES • STORAGE BUILDINGS • OFFICE TRAILERS • TOOL CRIBS • INPLANT OFFICES • PORTABLE OFFICES Guard House 4'X4' to 12'X20' Custom Designed Guard House -1 Portable Office 8'X8' to 12'X40' Custom Designed Portable Office Pacific Mobile Offices, Inc. Window and door locations are optional at no charge. Doors with or without windows optional at no charge. 4'X6' wood pressure treated skids are standard. All Pacific Buildings and trailers are underlined with Rodent and In- sect proof Mobile Seal. 15516 S. LAKEWOOD BLVD. BELLFLOWER, CA 90706-4284 (213) 920-7692 Left Hand Catalog Number Description Approx. List Prices Shipping F.O.B. Wt. Each Two Rivers DIAL -A -TORQUE "L" TABLES WITH STRATASTEEL' DRAWING BOARD Specify Finish: Sand Beige (A3) and Cloud Cray (A6) are standard. Chameleon (CH), Charcoal (A7), and Platinum (C7) also available. Reference surface is white leather plastic laminate with plastic edge moulding. Self -edge walnut reference surface available, subject • extended delivery at 540.00 extra. Class 'iti00 LTL Rate R.H. Ref. L.N. Ref, 27J454 27J354 32" x 42'' 27J455 7J355 371/2"x 50" 27J456 7,1356. 371/2" x60- . 0 '. 27J457 73357 371/2" x 72" <, 27J467 273367 .. 431/2" x 72" 27,1488 27J368 431/2"x 84" Stfa,astael boards vithout pencil trough available at same price. DIAL -A -TORQUE "1” TABLES WITH CELLULAR CORE BOARD ,33500„i 414.00 2,497.00 2,574.00 2,633.00 2,732.00 Right Hand R.H. Ref. L.H. Ref. 27J754 27J654 371"x 50'1, 27J755 27J655 371/2"x 60" 27,1756 27J65637'/x"x 72" 27J757 27J657 ,43'/2"x 72" 27J758 ;27J658 4311"x $4'`_ 497 �.. $2,280.00 511 ' 2,335.00 538 2,383.00 u_ 546 2,418.00 613 2,535 00 41.0R: N. Ret t.H Ref 27J481 `27J381 371/2" x 50" Overall with 30" x 35" Left Hand Illumination ...... 578 $3,424..00 27J482 27J382 371/2" x 60" Overall with 30" x 47" nationti ;�'��•r� a :, Illumi 609 3,553.00 Right Hand Note: Specify Right or Left Hand Reference Desk. Reference Surface — 29-5/8" x 68-1/4". '- Modesty panel for reference desk available subject to extended delivery. (Shipping weight 35 pounds.) (k) Request for design roposals CIP 85-137 Highland Avenue and CIP 85-102 Valley/Ardmore at Gould Street Improve- ments. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated December 30, 1986. (1) (m) Action: Authorize staff to solicit design proposals issue addendums as necessary for CIP 85-102 - Widen Highland Avenue, and CIP 85-137 - Redesign Valley/ Ardmore/Gould Intersection. Child Abuse Monthly Report. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated December 23, 1986. Action: To receive and file. Piano Use Policy. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated January 5, 1987. Action: To acknowledge the piano policy adopted by the Community Center Foundation ($100/day charge for use of grand piano - no charge for upright piano) and convey to the Foundation the City's desire to take advantage of the use of both pianos per the conditions of this policy. Motion Mayor DeBellis, second Cioffi. So ordered. • (n) 1985-86 Outside Audit Report. Memorandum from City Man- ager Gregory T. Meyer dated January 8, 1987. Supplemen- •••tal information . memorandum from City Manager Gregory T. Meyer dated January 13, 1986. (o) At the request of the City Manager, this item was rescheduled for the meeting of January 27,. 1987. Request for appropriation - performancg pay. Memoran- dum from Finance Administrator Viki Copeland dated January 8, 1987. Action: Appropriate $42,000 to departmental regular salaries accounts. (p) Approval of consultant agreement for traffic signal design for various CIPs. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated December 22, 1986. Action: To authorize the Mayor to sign agreement with Mohle, Grove & Associates, 901 East Imperial Highway, Suite A,. La Habra, CA, traffic signal design consultant. Motion Rosenberger, second Mayor DeBellis. So ordered. (q) Approval of plans and specifications and authorization to call for bids - asphalt street repair (CIP 86-163). Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 5, 1987. \, C December 28, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 12, 1988 HERMOSA BEACH PAVILION BUDGETING FOR FUTURE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: • 1. approve the attached budget for future improvemehts to the Pier/Valley/Ardmore intersection.. Background: The Hermosa Beach Pavilion is under construction at the northwest corner of 16th Street and Pacific Coast Highway. On August 12, 1986, City Council approved Resolution No. 86-4973 concurring with the Planning Commission's recommendation to certify a negative declaration with mitigation measures for the Hermosa Beach Pavilion. A mitigation measure for transportation required the developer to pay for a traffic engineering study to be performed before May 1, 1987. The developer deposited $3,000 on 11/24/86 for the study and the engineering report was accepted as complete by City Council on January 27, 1987. (The final cost of the study was $2,939.30; $60.70 was refunded to Developer's Equity, Inc.) After acceptance of the engineering study, the . developer is to pay to the City $40,000 for the suggested - improvements. The suggested improvements are to be budgeted within one (1) year of the completion of engineering. Hence, the final date to budget is January 27, 1988. Analysis: This analysis will discuss the following items: 1. Future Improvements, 2. Status of Billing to Developer, and 3. Pavilion and Circulation Element Status. 1. Future Improvements The Pavilion's negative declaration document with mitigation measures states "suggested improvements are to be budgeted within one (1) year of completion of the engineering". The engineer's report concluded that Pier/Valley/Ardmore must be totally reconstructed to produce a conventional intersection that can be signal controlled. Signalization of the existing two, two-way intersections will be more of a negative impact than present operation. On October 27, 1987, a report was presented to City Council addressing the Pier/Valley/Ardmore intersection. The report - 1 - 1p discussed three alternate design plans, condemnation procedures, and estimated cost and potential funding sources. After reviewing the report, City Council action was to go on record to study the intersection of Pier/Valley/Ardmore with the intent of possibly changing the two intersections to one intersection and to consider this as part of the Circulation Element Update to be done by DKS. 2. Status of Billing to Developer The Finance Department sent a billing to the developer (Developer's Equity, Inc.) requesting.payment of $40,000. The City Attorney has informed me (verbally) that payment from the developer is due before issuance of the CertiXicate'of Occupancy. 3. Pavilion and Circulation Element Status DKS is expected to complete the Circulation Element Update by July 1988. The Hermosa Beach Pavilion is expected to be ready for occupancy by September 1988. Alternatives: Other alternatives available to City Council and considered by staff are: 1. Proceed with intersection reconstruction. 2. Consider intersection reconstruction after completion of Circulation Element Update. Res•ectfully submitted, 4,AIA An 9' ny Antich Director of P Concur: lic Work es Loug ity Attorney Concur: Gay1=✓ T. Martin Interim City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator AA:mv hpb/v Attachments: 1. Transportation comments from the Certified Negative Declaration for the Hermosa Pavilion 2. Copy of CIP 87-177 Budget (proposed) cc: Bill Grove, Director of Building and Safety Mike Schubach, Planning Director 2 4 f .a 3 i a w X 4 E. TRANSPORTATION Major arterial access to the project site would be provided by :ztacific Coast Highway (PCH) located along the eastern boundary of the 'site. Also serving the site is 16th Street. PCH is designated as a major arterial highway providing 100 feet of right-of-way. In the immediate site area, this roadway provides two- lanes of travel. for both northbound and southbound :traffic. . Modifications to the striping 'and lane systems of PCH and pier Avenue have already been made to accommodate the adjoining Plaza Hermosa: • Pier Avenue is designated by the City of Hermosa Beach as an arterial highway providing 80 feet of right-of-way. This roadway provides two lanes of travel for eastbound and westbound traffic volumes. Its intersection with PCH is signal controlled. Ardmore Avenue is a Master Planned Collector roadway. Near the site area, this roadway is a two-lane street with restricted curb parking. The intersection of Pier and Ardmore Avenues is controlled by a 4 -way stop. Sixteenth Street is a local roadway situated along the north project boundary and .has a Master Planned right-of-way width of 40 feet. 10 COMMENTS ..;aylw.....+..�.-.•.. c.r -. .a. • •.bf.rw.....w i Developer shall post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $43,000 guaranteeing future improvements to the impacted intersections. Said bond shall be posted within two months of City Council approval of public financing of the project. Said approval is scheduled before July 31, 1986. a. The breakdown of the $43,000 shall be as follows: Traffic Engineering $ 3,000 Improvements 40,000 Total $43,000 The amounts may be adjusted, but in no event shall the total exceed $43,000. The City shall be authorized to draw on the bond to pay for cost after said bond is posted. The traffic engineering shall be performed before May 1, 1987. The cost for said engineering shall be paid for by the developer and performed by the City Engineer or his designee. Suggested improvements to be budgeted within one (1) year of completion of the engineering. In addition, staff strongly recommends that the City Council proceed with the improvement of the Pier and Valley Ardmore intersection now budgeted for fiscal year 1987. 12 COMMENTS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM February 15, 1989 TO: Viki Copeland, Finance Administrator 1. �#544Y4 FROM: Robert A. Blackwood, Personnel Directo /Risk Manager SUBJECT: Midyear Budget - Appropriation Request WORKERS' COMPENSATION 705-401-1217 4182 Workers' Comp - Current Year Currently has $25,325 remaining (2/2/89). This account funds all WC claims expenses including temporary disability, attorney fees, medical expenses, etc. Account is averaging approximately $14,400 per month. Continuing at this rate, this expenditure for this account would be $86,000. Adjusting for several large claims expenses this fiscal year, including the Personnel clerk typist's surgery and a Crossing Guard's back injury, it is an- ticipated that $42,000 will be expended from this account during the remainder of the fiscal year ($8,400/mo. X 5 mo.). This will require an additional appropriation of $16,675 (42,000-25,325) With the recent accident involving a motor officer who sustained substantial injuries, an additional $64,000 is expected to be paid during this fiscal year. This figure includes costs of in- tensive care at Harbor General and UCLA Medical Center, surgery, continuation of salary, prescriptions, etc. ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION REQUESTED = $80,675 4201 Contract Services - Private As a result of the change in third party administrators during this fiscal year, an additional one-time cost of $5,600 for the carry-over of existing claims was incurred. There will be an additional $4,970 expended for the Third Party Adminstration (TPA) contract. February 2, 1989 balance = -821. (821+4970=5,791) ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION REQUESTED = $5,791 LIABILITY INSURANCE - 705-401-1209 4201 Contract Services - Private Insurance Premium: A requirement of the ICRMA liability insurance program is to appropriate 175% of the premium. The additional 75% is released if not "called" by January 1st of each year. The amount budgeted for this fiscal year was $426,729. The actual EXHIBIT 7 premium paid was $213,443. The difference of the two ($213,286) is available for re -appropriation. Tort Defense: To date $40,000 has been expended for the defense of claims against the City. It is anticipated that an additional $30,000 will be expended for the remainder of the fiscal year. The amount budgeted under this object code (4201) was $50,000 for this expense. 75% additional premium = $213,286 Additional needed for Tort -<$ 20,000> Remainder available for re -appropriation = $193,286 PERSONNEL - 001-401-1203 4201 Contract Servcies - Private This account is presently $8,063 over -expended. This is in large part due to legal expenses for conducting hearings before the Civil Service Board (H.B. & L.A.). This acount also funds the expenses for advertising open positions. In addition to future advertising needs, there are two on-going appeals, one appeal being returned following an appeal, and an additional possibility of an appeal of Civil Service Rules and Regulations regarding eligibility lists. An additional appropriation of $4,000 is requested to cover legal and advertising expenses for the remaining of the fiscal year. ($8,063 over + $4,000 = $12,063) ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION REQUESTED = $12,063 4251 - Contract Services -Government This account funds testing services for examinations conducted by L.A. County. Future testing needs include General Services Officer, Firefighter & Paramedic, Building Department personel, Court Liaison Officer, Property & Evidence Technician, Dis- patcher, and Planning Assistant. Since the addition of the Per- sonnel Administrative Aide, testing for several of these posi- tions will be done "in-house" (i.e. Planning Assistant, Deputy City Engineer, etc.). While "in-house testing is being devel- oped, other testing will continue to be contracted with L.A. County. This account currently (2/2-89) has a negative balance of $893.35. ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION REQUESTED = $4,300 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 86-87 THROUGH FY 88-89 Third Year of Three Year Capital Improvement Program PROGRAM AREA: PROJECT NUMBER & NAME: ACCOUNT NUMBER: Street and Safety Improvements CIP 87-177, Future Improvements to the Pier/Valley/ Ardmore Intersection PROJECT LOCATION & DESCRIPTION: This project proposes future improvements to the PIer/Valley/Ardmore intersection and was originally budgeted January 12, 1988. The Hermosa Beach Pavilion is located at the northwest corner of 16th Street and Pacific Coast Highway. PROJECT BACKGROUND & STATUS: On August 12, 1986, City Council approved Resolution No. 86-4973 concurring with the Planning Commission's recommendation to certify a negative declaration with mitigation.meaSures for the Hermosa Beach Pavilion project. The Pavilion's negative declaration document with mitigation measures state "suggested improvements are to be budgeted within one (1) year of completion of the engineering". The engineer's report concluded that Pier/Valley/ Ardmore must be totally reconstructed to produce a conventional intersection that can be signal controlled. Signalization of the existing two two-way intersections will be more of a negative impact that present operation. The $40,000 deposited by the developer will finance the necessary design. No work will proceed on this CIP unless authorized by City Council. Paid on October 27, 1988, receipt #68119, SCHEDULED FISCAL YEAR START: TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: budget3/cip 4/4/88 $40,000. FY 88-89 T.VUTZUTT Q REQUEST AND JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ENHANCEMENT DEPARTMENT: POLICE When we began our budget year, it was indicated that we were going to assign two of our existing personnel to work narcotics on a local level. At the budget workshop, Council indicated that we should request whatever was necessary in order to impact the drug problem in our area. At that time, I indicated that we were not sure of the extent of the problem and that we would evaluate the situation and come back at mid -year review with recommendations. We took two officers from patrol and assigned them to work narcotics and vice in late October. The purpose of this team is to target, investigate, and arrest individuals who are engaged in street level narcotic trafficking in our City, and to seize assests derived from that illicit trafficking. Since that assignment, there have been remarkable results. Based on these results, it is our assessment that we have only scratched the surface of the drug problem in our City. Additionally, the Police Chiefs of El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Inglewood, Palos Verdes, and Hermosa Beach formed a special unit, which became operational in in mid-January, to address the narcotics problems in our area. The primary purposes of this team, named WESTNET, are the identification and conviction of high-level drug traffickers, and the seizure of assets derived through drug trafficking in our area; the targeting, investigation and prosecution of indivi- duals who organize, direct, finance, or otherwise engage in high-level drug trafficking enterprises or money laundering with high priority emphasis on those subjects engaged in the importation of drugs into our area, and the interdiction of such illicit pipelines; and the promotion of coordinated drug enforcement efforts throughout the area, encouraging maximum cooperation between all law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies. As a participant in this unit, Hermosa Beach should realize between $300,000 to $700,000 each year in cash seizures. In order to participate in this unit, we assigned one of the officers from the local narcotics unit and took another officer from patrol. This leaves one officer to work narcotics locally, but has depleted the patrol force to bare minimums. In order to effectively impact the drug problem of our City, I feel a three pronged program is necessary. 1) Education of the next generation and their parents; 2) Aggressive, street level enforcement; and 3) Aggressive area -wide enforcement on a cooperative basis. We are currently doing a very good job on education with the DARE programs and the Beach Cities Coalition for Alcohol and Drug Free Youth. The following recommendation is offered to address the enforcement aspects of the program. A narcotics/vice program of 4 officers is needed to address our narcotics concerns; 2 locally and 2 in WESTNET. We propose that the entire narcotics program be funded from the available asset seizure and forfeiture funds and that 1 EXHIBIT 9 we be allowed to replace the budgeted personnel in patrol. We currently have over $200,000 available in the forfeiture fund and recent rulings allow those funds to be used for salaries associated with narcotics enforcement as well as purchase of equipment for same. All of the expenses for the narcotics unit would be taken from the fund. Seizures resulting from the narcotics program would replenish the fund. To fill the vacancies and shortage of manpower on Patrol, caused by the assignments, we ask authorization to overhire our authorized strength by four officer positions. Since all of the expenses for the narcotics unit is being paid by the forfeiture fund, there would be no need to increase our General Fund budget to fill the positions, as they are already budgeted for.. Should the seizures not come as expected, then the program would be trimmed and the additional positions abolished. We are confident that the seizures will come since WESTNET has already taken possession of $500,000 and there are at least two other cases pending as this is being written. Approval of this recommendation would allow us to keep our patrol force at strength to address the basic level of service issue as well as special services such as foot patrol and traffic. A proposed budget for the program has been established for the period of March to July. It should be noted that $9,215 of the amount budgeted for equip- ment and $1,800 of the vehicle rental amount are funds that have already been expended from the general Police budget for the narcotics program to date. It is the intent to transfer these amounts back to the general Police budget. The proposed budget for the program from March to July is as follows: Salaries - $47,428 Uniform Allowance - 934 Special Duty Pay 3,520 Vehicle rental 7,400 Pager rental - 160 Cellular Telephone expense - 1,440 Buy money - 2,000 Equipment - 14,215 Contract service (rental of aircraft for surveillance) - 2,000 $79,097 2 i MIDYEAR REVIEW 1988-1989 REVISIONS TO BUDGET TRANSFERS GENERAL FUND TRANSFER IN FROM PARKING FUND REVISED NET INCOME FROM ASSET FORFEITURE PURCHASES LESS THAN BUDGETED PARKING TRANSFER OUT TO GENERAL FUND REVISED COME STATE GAS TAX TRANSFER IN FROM REVENSHARING CIP 160 TRANSFERS 12/31/88 $1,742,924 $1,434,013 $ 110,129 GENERAL REVENUE SHARING TRANSFER OUT TO STATE GAS TAX CIP 160 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND $ 39,000 $ 66,307 REVISION - $10,505 998. - 10,505 - 8,300 - 8,300 TO GENERAL PURCHASES LESS THAN BUDGETED - 998 EXHIBIT 10 TOTAL $1,731,421 $1,423,508 $ 101, 829 $ 30,700 $ 65,309 • • • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: Viki Copeland, Finance Administrator FROM: Anthony Antich, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Status of Capital Improvement Projects Mid -year Budget Review DATE: January 25, 1989 C�.c'1/4• CIP 85-102 Street and Safety Improvements FAU, Widen Highland Ave., from Longfellow to 35th Street Status: Re -submitted to Caltrans for additional review on October 15, 1988. Expecting Council approval for authorization to bid in January 1989. Budget $118,800 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ 2,546 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $118,800 CIP 85-137 FAU, Valley/Ardmore at Gould Avenue Status: FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) has approved the project. Awaiting assignment of funds agreement due in February 1989. Budget $72,600 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ -0- Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $72,600 CIP 85-138 FAU, Traffic Signal Improvements Status: Council awarded contracts for construction and inspection services June 14, 1988. Construction scheduled to start January 9, 1989. Budget $191,400 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ 1,013 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $191,400 1 • CIP 85-160 Roadway Improvements & Appurtenances Status: Proposals are due on January 9, 1989 for engineering services to determine repairs for concrete streets City-wide. Scheduled for award by Council on February 12, 1989. Budget $132,600 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ 38,470 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989......(., $100,000 CIP 87-165 Hermosa Beach Miscellaneous Bikeway Construction Status: Contract awarded to Neff Contracting Corp. on May 10, 1988. Work not satisfactorily complete. Staff in process of negotiating a credit from the contractor for poor quality work. Budget $19,351 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ 629 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $11,000 CIP 87-170 Street Sealing Status: Work includes slurry sealing and repairing asphalt street. Work scheduled to start in January 1989, weather permitting. Budget $137,500 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ 22 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $137,500 CIP 87-171 Asphalt Street Repairs Status: Proposals are due on January 9, 1989 for engineering services to determine repairs for asphalt street repairs City-wide. Scheduled for award by Council on February 12, 1989. Budget $149,755 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ 53,640 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $149,755 CIP 88-173 AC Overlay for Portions of Valley/Ardmore Status: FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) has approved the project. Awaiting assignment of funds agreement due in February 1989. Budget $132,000 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ -0- Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $132,000 CIP 88-174 AC Overlay for Portions of Prospect Avenue Status: FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) has approved the project. Awaiting assignment of funds agreement due in February 1989. Budget $132,000 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988$ 88,285 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $132,000 CIP 86-176 Traffic Control Pre-emption Status: Design plans and specifications are complete. Scheduled to authorize call for bids by City Council on January 24, 1988. Budget $40,200 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ 2,874 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $40,200 CIP 85-201 Status: Street Lighting Improvements Light Conversion and New Installations Pacific Coast Highway, and Herondo Street completed. Budget $44,000 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $11,270 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $24,000 CIP 85-202 Hermosa Avenue/Pier Avenue Lighting Status: The street light poles for Pier Avenue have been ordered. Installation is expected to begin in February 1989 and the work will be performed by the Street Lighting Division of the Public Works Department. Budget $49,500 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $14,507 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $20,000 CIP 85-203 Pier Lighting Grounding Status: Project complete. Budget $27,500 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ 620 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $ 1,000 Sewers/Storm Drains CIP 87-302 Beach Drive Improvements Status: Project complete. Budget $ 64,896 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ 40,000 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $ 40,000 CIP 86-405 Replacement and Upsizing of Sanitary Sewer Lines City wide Status: Design completed by Harris & Associates for $54,150. Construction bid awarded on December 13, 1988 to Colich & Sons for $680,845. Anticipate work to begin in January 1989. Budget $1,089,000 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ 796 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $ 750,000 CIP 88-406 Sanitary Sewer Improvements, Target Area 4 Status: City Council award of design agreement scheduled for January 10, 1989. Budget $484,000 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ 1,304 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $100,000 CIP 88-407 Sanitary Sewer Bond Issue Status: Discussions with financial consultant. Work to begin during first quarter 1989. Budget $50,000 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ -0- Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $15,000 • 5 Park Improvements CIP 85-502 Prospect Park Development Status: Project complete. Budget $5,500 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 -0- Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 -0- CIP 86-506 Status: Budget Various Park Improvements In Progress. $10,000 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ 5,207 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $10,000 CIP 87-507 Status: Project complete. Budget Clark Field Tennis Court Resurfacing $ 5,100 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 -0- CIP 87-508 Park Irrigation Restoration Status: Proposals are due on January 9, 1989 for engineering services to determine repairs or upgrading of irrigation systems for the City's parks. Budget $121,000 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ 1,234 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $ 40,000 CIP 88-612 City -Wide Signs Status: No work to date. Budget $10,000 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ 1,185 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $10,000 CIP 88-614 Pier Storm Damage Status: Contract awarded to Moffat & Nichol, Engineers on November 22, 1988 for design services. Anticipate Council call for bids in January 1989. Budget $37,800 Estimated Expenditure as of December 31, 1988 $ 201 Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $37,800 cip pwadmin 8 REQUEST AND JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ENHANCEMENT DEPARTMENT: FIRE The need for a 40 hour position in the Fire Department has become more obvious over the last year. The possibility of changing one of the existing firefighter positions was considered, but rejected as not being the best deployment of authorized personnel. A 40 hour position could serve as the assistant to the Director with regard to Fire services and would be responsible for items such as administering the fire prevention program, checking building plans and blueprints, administering the hazardous materials program, serve as the personnel officer for the depart- ment, administer the training program, oversee fire records maintenance, and administer the fire hydrant replacement and upgrade program. This position would allow continuity for important items such as plan check in order to expedite service to the citizens The proposed salary range for the position should be the equivalent to that of a Fire Captain, 3995 to 4405. Since the new postion will be assuming the duties of plan check, this will delete the 5% (2,643) a year bonus being paid to one of the current Captains for that responsibility. The position would be exempt from FLSA and overtime requirements. Proposed budget increase for additional person from March to July: Salary - $16,780 Uniform allowance - 75 Educational Incentive - 1,200 $18,055 Estimated annual budget for position 89-90: Salary - $51,060 Uniform allowance - 225 Educational Incentive - 3,600 (Less plan check bonus - 2,643) $52,242 M89-16 City Manager Comment: This is not recommended at this time even though the need for one non -shift fire employee does exist. I would encourage a review of the entire Public Safety Department staffing to see if this position could be funded through a realignment at no additional City cost. REQUEST AND JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ENHANCEMENT DEPARTMENT: POLICE We recently began deployment of traffic officers again in an effort to address the traffic problems and enhance productivity of the Department. The newest motorcycle in operation is 5 years old. We have two that are 6 years old and two that are 7 years old. One of the motors has been completely cannibalized for parts to keep other motors running, and two of the bikes are inoperative and require major repairs to the engines. That leaves only two motors functional at this time. In order to keep traffic officers operational, two new motors should be purchased. Purchase of two police motorcycles would cost $13,025 plus tax. The City of Manhattan Beach is currently maintaining our motorcycles. Their quote for a maintenance on the motorcycles is $180. per motor for a tune- up every 6,000 miles, and $32. per hour labor charge for other work. We request that an open purchase order for $500. be granted for the frequent minor repairs associated with the motorcycles. M89-18 City Manager Comment: Not recommended at this time. Our concern about the advisability of using motorcycles existed prior to Officer Lewis' recent injury, but his injury accented our need to review thoroughly the pros and cons of motors. This study is now in process. (the study concerns use of motorcycles, not deployment of traffic officers. The latter will continue but can be accomplished in automobiles.) February 20, 1989 Honorable Mayor City Council meeting and Members of City Council of February 28, 1989 REPORT ON REFUSE ENCLOSURE ENFORCMENT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1) Direct staff to pursue refuse enclosure enforcement as indicated. 2) Direct staff to include upgrading of the refuse enclosures for the shared refuse bin locations in the downtown area in the Capital Improvement Budget. BACKGROUND On October 25, 1989, the City Council acted to affirm a phased -in enforcement of existing regulations pertaining to refuse enclosures. ANALYSIS Existing municipal regulations require that storage facilities for refuse containers be provided for both residential and com- mercial occupancies. The regulations were adopted in March, 1977 and indicate that all commercial and residential structures had a two year period from the date the regulations were enacted to provide a refuse enclosure. Apparently notification was provided to the majority of property owners and a great many complied with the regulations. At the time the regulations were enacted, the city had an environmental control officer position which was to enforce the refuse enclo- sure provisions. The person holding the position left city em- ployment in 1979 and the position was abolished as a cost saving measure. Apparently no further action was taken regarding those properties without refuse enclosures following that date. The Department of Building and Safety has enforced the provisions on new structures and on existing structures when a complaint was received. A survey conducted by staff indicates that there are 839 proper- ties which are currently in violation of either having no refuse enclosure or of not utilizing an area if one exists. 1 8 r A great number of the properties are able to comply due to avail- able space to construct an enclosure or by simply moving the re- fuse containers to a screened yard area. In the case of existing multi -family residential structures and commercial sructures, the solutions are not as easy. Compliance with refuse enclosure pro- visions, in some of those cases, will mean removal of available off street parking spaces or significant modifications to the structures. It is staffs intention to initiate notification to all those properties where refuse enclosure violations exist. Those proper- ties where compliance will require significant modifications to a building will be allowed considerably more time to comply than those properties with space readily available for a refuse enclosure. City facilities are also in violation of the refuse enclosure regulations. The Public Works Department has scheduled construc- tion of refuse enclosures at City Hall, Clark Stadium and the Community Center for March of this year utilizing available funds. The refuse enclosures for the shared bins in the downtown area are incomplete. Due to the design considerations for those large enclosures, staff is recommending that funds be allocated in the next Capital Improvement Budget to upgrade those facilities. The city should be setting an example for refuse enclosures if there is an expectation for other property owners to comply with the regulations. Respectfully submitted, William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety Concur: Concur: 'Kevin B. Northcraft Anthony Antich City Manager Public Works Director § 27A-3 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE j 27A4 Sec. 27A-3. Pre -collection practices. (a) Approved refuse containers. It shall be the duty of every owner or occupant of a residence or commercial estab- lishment to provide and maintain, in sanitary conditon, at least one approved refuse container; however, additional ap- proved containers shall be provided as deemed necessary to contain all refuse generated from said location between days of collection. Approved refuse containers shall be defined from time to time by the council through resolution. (b) Refuse containers to be marked. (1) It shall be the duty of every person owning or using a refuse container to print or mark. or cause to be printed or :narked. thereon in figures at least two (2) inches in height and clearly and readily legible the house number or business address to which the con- tainer belongs. It shall be the duty of such person to cause such number or address to be kept plainly marked thereon at ail times. (2) Unmarked containers shall be considered unclaimed property when left on a public right-of-way past 10:00 a.m. of the day following the regular day of collection. Such containers shall be impounded and disposed of in a manner considered appropriate by the administrative authority. (c) Storage of containers. All residential and comrnercial structures constructed after 1973 shall be required to provide an enclosure for the storage of trash and rubbish receptacles and containers. Ail residential and commercial structures con- structed prior to 1973 shall have two (2) calendar years from the date of adoption of this chapter [March 3, 1977] to pro- vide refuse container enclosures in accordance with the provi- sions stated herein. Where such refuse or rubbish container enclosures have been constructed, all containers shall be placed therein. Supp. No. 10-80 332.28 3 2'TA-3 SANITATION, GARBAGE AND REFUSE 2'7A-3 (1) Residential. Storage facilities for residences shall in- clude an area sufficient for three (3) 35 -gallon capacity refuse containers. Such storage facilities shall be pro- vided in any one of the following ways: (i) Attached to the outside of the structure on pr- vately owned property, enclosed on all sides by suitable screening of not less than four (4) feet in height or similar type of structure so that the same shall not be open to pubiic view, one side of which may be opened as a gate. Such storage facilities shall have- a concrete, asphalt or similar base and shall be adequately ventilated; or (ii) Constructed within the building structure: or (iii) A separate structure enclosed on all sides by suit- able screening of not less than four (4) feet in height or similar type of structure so that the same shall not be open :o public view, one side of which may be opened as a gate. Such storage facilities shall have a concrete, asphalt or similar base and shall be adequately ventilated; or (iv) Within an accessory building such as a gauge or storage shed, or within a primary structure in a service porch -type area. Commercial bins or receptacles may be used in place of individual 35 -gallon containers for multipie-dwelling units if the capacity of such commercial bins or recep- tacles equals or exceeds the amount of 35 -gallon refuse containers that would otherwise be required by this section. (2) Commercial. Storage facilities for commercial estab- lishments shall include an area sufficient to enclose commercial iift container(s). Such storage facilities shall be provided in any one of the following -.vat's: (i) Attached to the outside of the structure on pri- vately owned property. enclosed on all sides by suitable screening of not less than five (5) feet in height or similar type of structure so that the same shall not be open to pubiic view, one side of which may be opened as a gate. Such storage Supp. No. 4-7 'o'•► § 27A-3 EERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE g 21A4 facilities shall have a concrete, asphalt or similar base and shall be adequately ventilated; or (ii) Constructed within the building structure; or (iii) A separate structure enclosed on all sides 'oy suit- able screening of not less than five (5) feet in height or similar type of structure so that the same shall not be open to public view, one side of which may be opened as a gate. Such storage facil- ities shall have a concrete, asphalt or similar base and shall be adequately ventilated. Storage enclosures built in accordance with (i), (ii) or (iii) of subparagraph (c) (2) of this section shall be constructed so as to facilitate the removal and replacement of approved commercial refuse containers without causing damage to said container. (3) Owners of commercial establishments that have been determined unsatisfactory by the administrative author- ity for the placement of approved commercial refuse containers shall compiy with the storage enclosure re- quirements as deter;nined appropriate by the adminis- trative authority. (4) Every owner, occupant and person responsible for :nan- agernent of premises shall keep refuse containers, when not set out for collection of refuse, in an area where such containers are screened from view from any point at grade outside the property where said containers are stored. Where no container storage area is available which would be screened from view, then a suitable container storage structure shall be constructed. (5) Storage areas in commercial estabiishments, when fire spread potential exists, shall be provided with a sprin- kler system in accordance with the relevant provisions of :he fire prevention code of the city. (d) Location of containers for collection. Refuse containers shall be piaced for collection in the location and manner as follows: (1) Where there is an alley, other than a blind alley, in the rear of the premises where refuse is offered for Suoo. No. 447 332.30 27A-4 SANITATION, GARBAGE AND REFUSE 27A-4 collection, the containers shall be placed in the alley in a convenient place for the collector immediately adjacent to the property line only during the hours fixed for collection. (2) Where there is no alley in the rear of the premises or where the oniy alley in the .rear of the premises is a biind alley or an alley not server( by the collector, the containers shall be placed on the curb adjoining the premises in a convenient place for the collector only during the hours fixed for collection. (3) Commercial refuse containers shall be placed within the property boundaries of commercial establishments and multipie-dwelling units utilizing commercial refuse containers except where space and accessibility prevent such placement during the period of two (2) years following adoption of this chapter. During said 7770 - year period, the exact location of said containers out- side the boundaries of commercial establishments shall be subject to the approval of the administrative authority. (4) In the event that undue problems arise as to the place- ment of refuse for collection, the administrative author- ity shall decide upon the final placement of refuse for collection. (Ord. No. 77-553, § 1, 3-3-77) Sec. 27.44. Post -collection practices. (a) Removal of refuse containers. Any person who places refuse containers) for collection in an alley or upon a curb- side shall remove all containers from the area where :he collection was made by 10:00 a.m. of the :Horning following the regular day of collection. Containers not timely removed as set forth above shall be deemed unclaimed property and shall be removed by the city. impounded and disposed of in a manner considered appropriate by the administrative au- thority. (b) Maintenance of abutting street or ailey. Prior to and following collection, it shall be the duty of every property Supp. No. 4-77 :!:32.31 7. RECOMMENDATION TO INCREASE ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS ON CER- TAIN CITY ORDINANCES. Memorandum from City Manager Ke- vin B. Northcraft dated October 5, 1988. (Continued from October 11, 1988 meeting.) Action: To affirm the phased -in enforcement of existing ordinance provisions regarding dog defiling and leashes upon the Greenbelt, trash enclosures, and posting of signs in the public right-of-way, with a goal of a January 1st enforcement date. Temporary signs along right-of-way appx. every 200 feet to inform public when we will be begin enforcing, and perhaps warning notices given until the enforcement date. It was suggested that information be provided with dog licenses regarding the leash and defiling laws. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. Minutes 10-25-88 6 30 NORTH RAYMOND AVENUE SUITE 708 PASADENA, CALIF. 91103-3930 JAMES P LOUGH ATTORNEY AT LAW February 22, 1989 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TEL: (8i8) 792-4728 (818) 792'4776 FAX: (818) 449-6873 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 1989 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney RE: Moratorium Request on Video Sales Recommended Action: For council to decide whether or not to adopt, by a four-fifths vote, the attached ordinance entitled: AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESSES THAT SELL AND/OR RENT VIDEO TAPES IN THE C-1 AND C-2 ZONES. Attached hereto you will fine an urgency ordinance which would immediately stop the sale the issuance of conditional use permits and building permits for video sales and/or rentals in the C-1 and C-2 zones. This ordinance was drafted based on council direction at the last council meeting and would remain in effect for 45 days. If extended through the proper public hearing procedures, the matter could be extended for a period of 22 months. As stated at the last City Council meeting, this ordinance would act against all video rentals and sales regardless of the content of the materials. This would allow the City Council to send the matter to the Planning Commission to consider whether such a band should be imposed. Also, the Planning Commission could make a recommendation whether or not an amortization period should be established and the length of that. JPL/gp Attachment cc: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager Respectfp submit AMES P. LO H, City Attorney ITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 34/SR0228B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 89 - AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESSES THAT SELL AND/OR RENT VIDEO TAPES IN THE C-1 AND C-2 ZONES. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that a special study is needed to determine whether video tapes should be sold and/or rented in neighborhood commercial zones; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach has directed the Planning Commission to study the impacts of locat- e d ing such uses in neighborhoocommercial zones and their general impact upon the community; WHEREAS, during the period of this study, a proliferation of video tape rental and/or sale uses could occur which would be incompatible with the nature and use of the neighborhood commer- cial zones of C-1 and C-2; WHEREAS, the City Council considers the potential prolifera- tion of video tape rental and/or sale uses in the.neighborhood commercial zones as posing a potential, immediate threat to the health, safety and welfare of its citizens, especially adjoining residential uses which may be affected by potential, secondary effects of placement of these uses in neighborhood commercial zones; WHEREAS, Section 65858 of the Government Code authorizes the adoption of an interim ordinance as an emergency measure which can act to prevent conflicts with the contemplated proposal that the City Council has directed the Planning Commission to study; 34/ORD28 -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That no building permits or conditional use permits shall be issued for any businesses, new or existing, within the C-1 and C-2 neighborhood commercial zones for video tape rental and/or sales. Section 2. That this ordinance shall take effect immedi- ately upon adoption by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach. Section 3. That this ordinance be effective for a period of forty-five (45) days from today's date unless extended pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 65858. Section 4. That the City Council shall draft a report for presentation to the public at its second regular meeting in March, 1989. Such report shall state what steps are being taken by the City to correct the problems referenced in this ordinance and what steps are planned to be taken in the future to remedy this situation. Section 5. That prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, shall make minutes of the /// /// 34/ORD28 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1989. ATTEST: CITY CLERK A PROVED AS TO 4/1 ATTORNEY 34/ORD28 -3- PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR .OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA - ti February 23, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of February 28, 1989 REQUESTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS FOR POSSIBLE AGENDA ITEMS - STAFF INPUT ON (a) School properties -- This request by Councilmember Simpson relates to recent articles regarding the possible annexation of the Hermosa School District by other districts. An ini- tial reaction might be that this is a school district matter rather than the City; however, discussions with other man- agers at a recent conference has made me more aware of the importance of cities working with school districts as partners in planning the future of a community. With this in mind, it would be appropriate to offer to work with the school district in considering its options. Such an offer might appropriately be made at our next joint meeting with the school district, which is planned in the next few months when the Environmental Impact Report on the oil recovery project has been publicly released. (b) Handling of written communications -- This is a request by Mayor Pro Tem Williams. The current policy dating back to a prior list of goals by the City Council is intended to han- dle all requests of the City as equally as possible. Staff's objective is to respond to all requests for informa- tion, services or complaints. When a letter is addressed to the Council, the letter is immediately copied to the Coun- cil, then re -copied again with the response when it has been prepared and issued. This allows the Council to review the response, and request agendizing it if they feel other ac- tion is appropriate. (c) City Manager housing assistance -- This is a request by Mayor Pro Tem Williams for further discussion of this item acted on by the Council at your last regular meeting. Due to the time when the item was raised on the agenda, there was no staff report on the agenda item, which left the public unaware of the purposes of the recommendation. There are three purposes for considering assistance with housing: (1) the need for key employees in the City's emer- gency response team to be accessible to their homes and work. Currently, only two of the nine top management mem- bers live within the City, and only one of the three key emergency department heads (City Manager, Public Works, Public Safety) reside within the City. Having been an emer- gency coordinator for a city during a seven day state of emergency in 1986, I feel that we are in a poor position to respond to such types of emergencies (in my view, an unac- ceptably poor position). In addition, on a day to day ba- sis, the residency of department heads within a community makes them more sensitive to the community and its concerns and issues, and arguably better employees as a result. (2) The second purpose of the agenda item was to consider pro- viding a fringe benefit that would not be a cost to the 12 City. As you know, this a common personnel practice to seek such benefits for the obvious reasons of improvement and retention without an expenditure by the City. (3) The third purpose that would be served by the Council's action is the revenue to the City that would result, which is esti- mated to be a net gain of more than $2,000 a year. In adopting a proposal to provide housing assistance to the City Manager, I think the City Council had good insight into the need for consideration for such assistance, and joins at least three other South Bay cities (Rolling Hills Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Inglewood) and at least a dozen or so cities throughout the state in considering such assistance. There are two concerns that I have that would impact the utilization of this assistance at this time. First, the call back provision of four months, which is the same four month period in my agreement for notice and severance pay, essentially makes it a repetitive four-month loan amortized over a longer period of time. This is a severe condition, and the interest rate does not appear to be a realistic ad- vantage compared to private market loans without such restrictions. Second, in discussing individually this item with the Council prior to agendizing the matter, I indicated to several of you that the issue was not so important that it should create a political difficulty or controvery. This has occurred for at least one councilmember, so I think con- sistent with my commitment,I will not pursue the assistance voted in concept by the Council at its last meeting. I would hope the Council would continue to consider such assistance in its discussions with other current and future employees for the reasons cited. The housing situation in Hermosa Beach certainly will continue to get worse, and some consideration is definitely appropriate . (d) Public tours of Sanitation District facilities -- This item was requested by Councilmember Simpson. The matter was dis- cussed with our staff, who was unaware of any significant of any interest in the community for such tours. If the Coun- cil wishes to set up such tours, we will initiate action to do so. (e) County's invitation for participation in 1989 Earthg1ake Survival Program -- This item was requested by Mayor Rose- nberger. Staff feels such a program is appropriate given the earthquake hazards in California and would support our participation this year in this promotional activity coordi- nated by the County of Los Angeles. its.40L/P6841:405201 Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager KBN/ld COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY 1955 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, CA 90601-4998 Mailing Address: P. 0. Box 4998, Whittier, CA 90607-4998 T o - (213) 699-7411, (213) 685-5217 Boards4:,,,„ ,,, , (,,,.„.1,1,1, „......,____ 6,/„4.,..., ,,,,v of Direct rs k2 ' ' 'L"� County Sanitation Diageeitg/'ct/. No. 5 and South Bay Cities a Santo 'on District „2--(3- g' Directors: CHARLES W. CARRY Chief Engineer and General Manager February 9, 1989 - Public Tours of Sanitation District Facilities At the meeting of the Boards of Directors in January, a discussion was held regarding the possibility of member cities hosting tours of Sanitation District facilities. The subject arose as a result of a tour being arranged by the City of Rancho Palos Verdes for its citizens on Saturday, February 25, 1989, similar to the annual tour for the Boards of Directors. I indicated at the meeting that the Sanitation Districts would be pleased to accommodate tours beginning in any of your cities as a way to allow the public to better understand our wastewater and solid waste management systems. I also indicated that it may be preferable in terms of generating a response to have the cities take the lead in arranging for the tour. That belief is based upon the assumption that citizens are more com- fortable making arrangements with their local city rather than dealing with the Sanitation Districts, with whom they have had little contact. Details such as who would arrange for transportation, what day of the week is 'best, where the tour should start and what the specific schedule should be can be worked out on a city by city basis. It is also possible that a few of the cities may want to combine their efforts and take advantage of the logistical and publicity advantages of co -sponsoring a tour. The Sanitation Districts' staff will work with any of the interested cities and, obviously, will be available to conduct the tours on any days selected by the cities. I would appreciate your relaying this communication to your city staffs if you want them to pursue this matter. If your city is interested,please contact Joe Haworth, the Districts' Public Information Officer, at Extension 2302, to start making the necessary arrangements. Yours ve;y truly, CWC:cam Charles W. Carr BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 821 HALL OF ADMINISTRATION / LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90012 February 1, 1989 The Honorable Jim Rosenberger, Mayor City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mayor Rosenberger: i'ECEIVEb ``Bi989 EARTHQUARE SURVIVAL PROGRAM -r, MEMBERS OF THE BOAR PETER F. SCHABARUM KENNETH HAM EDMUND D. EDELMAN DEANE DANA MICHAEL O. ANTONOVICH •DMUND 0. EOELMAN CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD 974.3333 The County of Los Angeles has developed an educational campaign, called the Earthquake Survival Program, designed to provide residents with an on-going and simplified method of becoming better prepared for a catastrophic earthquake. The theme for this program is "ESP is the key" (to your peace of mind) and it calls for residents to take a different precaution each month until an adequate level of self-sufficiency is achieved. The purpose of this letter is to introduce you to the program and to enlist your city's (county's) cooperation and support in this energetic and most worthwhile project. Since the latter part of 1988, the County Disaster Services Office has been actively involved in the design of this program. Staff has met with representatives from the Southern California Grocers Association, utility companies, mass media corporations, and the Red Cross to seek their guidance and commitment. It now'appears that this program will be implemented in conjunction with the State of California's "Earthquake Preparedness Campaign" in April with information and educational efforts. During the succeeding months, beginning with "Purchase Emergency Water" month in May, the general public will be encouraged to purchase, or take action on, a number of items (see attached list). Your city's (county's) participation in this program does not require any special attention or the expenditure of funds. I only The Honorable Jim Rosenberger, Mayor February 1, 1989 Page 2 request that you take Council (Board) action in the form of either adopting this County's monthly proclamations, or writing your own, proclaiming the month for its particular item and urging your citizens to take the specific action. During the month of February, the Board of Supervisors will take action to approve an initial proclamation that designates the month of April as "Earthquake Awareness Month", endorsing the State of California's efforts and introducing the Earthquake Survival Program. This resolution will be forwarded to all cities in Los Angeles County and to the Board of Supervisors of Orange, San Bernardino, San Diego, Riverside, and Ventura counties in time for action during meetings in the month of March. Each month thereafter, similar action will be taken that addresses the targeted item for the following month which will also be forwarded to the respective cities and counties in time for appropriate action. I have only very briefly described the components of this exciting effort in making the residents of Southern California better prepared for a major disaster. If you have any questions, comments, or suggestions regarding this program, please feel free to have a member of your staff contact Captain John Anderson at (213) 974-1120, or Joyce Harris at (213) 974-1166 in the Disaster Services Office. On behalf of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, I sincerely believe that collectively we can influence the educational and preparedness awareness levels of our residents. The better able they are to take care of themselves following a major disaster, the less strain and demand they will place on our precious emergency resources. I look forward to your full support of the Earthquake Survival Program. Sincerely, EDMUND D. EDELMAN Chairman Board of Supervisors Attachment Los Angeles County EARTHQUAKE SURVIVAL PROGRAM TARGETED ITEMS 1. EDUCATION EFFORTS 2. EMERGENCY DRINKING WATER 3. FIRST AID KIT AND FIRST AID BOOK 4. EMERGENCY FOOD AND MANUAL CAN OPENER 5. FLASHLIGHT AND BATTERIES 6. ADJUSTABLE WRENCH FOR GAS SHUT-OFF 7. SMOKE DETECTOR 8. FIRE EXTINGUISHER 9. STRAP YOUR WATER HEATER 10. SAFETY EQUIPMENT- WORK GLOVES 11. PORTABLE RADIO AND BATTERIES 12. HOME SAFETY MEASURES February 21, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council February 28, 1989 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES JANUARY, 1989 ACTIVITY REPORT The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of January. SPECIAL EVENTS Registration and plans were completed for the February 5th Sand and Strand Race. Planning continued for summer events, 1989. We will be the host City for the Daily Breeze International Surf Festival July 27-30 which means we will host the lifeguard nighttime competitions in addition to our regularly scheduled events. RECREATION PROGRAMING Recreation Specialists prepared a spring, 1989 program of classes in addition to Easter week activities. Classes will include karate, tennis, dance, theatre, volleyball and computer training. Easter week activities will include egg coloring, movies, crafts and the hunt. COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION Ticket sales for the 1989 series continue. To date the series opener, The Canadian Brass is approximately 60% sold. The concert, scheduled for March 11 features the foremost brass quintet in the world. Staff finalized preparations for the sixth annual theatre Gala (held on Saturday, February 4th). STOP -BY -CENTER . Staff accompanied Stop -by -Center Director in an inspection of an available trailer for the program. Stop -by -Center Director is to get back to the City with an update on this project. ADVISORY COMMISSION . A subcommittee of the Commission has been working with staff in selecting playground equipment for Valley Park (to be purchased with Grant funds as approved by Council). . The Commission is also working on the refurbishment of the old Prospect School and park improvements. 1 • The RFP for a Master Plan for Parks and Recreation' was sent out to 16 consulting firms. • The Commission continues to work with the Youth Basketball League in assisting the league in their operation and use' of the Community Center gym. MEETINGS • Staff attended the following meetings: Commission, City Council, SCAATS, Foundation Board, Sand and Strand, Coordinating Council, senior citizens and five event planning meetings. FACILITY RESERVATIONS • In January we received approximately 40 calls per week regarding facility reservations. As we now have full staffing in the Department, we are keeping a very accurate log. The requests appear to be increasing. • New reservations this month include: Orbaz Party, Cheng Party, Kim Page Party, Friedman Baskeball, Meistrell Basketball and Hermosa Beach personnel. COMMUNITY CENTER MEETING ROOMS Hope Chapel Community Center Foundation Community Center Advisory Commission Sister Cities Teen Advocate Chamber of Commerce Little League Pre/Post Exercise SuperKids Gym 1736 Family Crisis Center COMMUNITY CENTER GYMNASIUM Cooley Basketball Colen Basketball General Services Cascio Basketball Byron Basketball Wohn Basketball Cohen Basketball Friedman Basketball Botelho Basketball ARC Easter Seals SuperKids Gymnasitcs Meistrell Basketball Youth Basketball COMMUNITY CENTER LEASES Easter Seals Project Touch Hope Chapel Salvation Army Dispute Resolution So. Bay Free Clinic Teen Advocate Center Historical Society Association for Retarded Citizens (ARC) COMMUNITY CE}ITER THEATRE Hope Chapel Maintenance CLARK BUILDING We average four private parties per month in addition to the following weekly/monthly meetings. Jazzercise Aerobics Senior Exercise Senior Club Meeting Women's Club Superkids Sunday AA meeting Monday AA meeting South Bay Unity Church CLARK FIELD AY SO Dog Obedience DEPARTMENT REVENUE: Noted: See attached. •CCevin B. Northcraft City Manager 3 VALLEY PARK RESERVATIONS January, 1988 February, 1988 March, 1988 April, 1988 May, 1988 June, 1988 July, 1988 Aug., 1988 Sept., 1988 Oct., 1988 Nov., 1988 Dec., 1988 Jan., 1989 Respectfully submitted, Alana Mastrian-Handman Director Dept. of Community Resources 0 4 7 7 18 16 14 7 8 3 2 1 DEPT. OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES REVENUE TO DATE JANUARY 31 1989 1987-88 1988-89 COMMUNITY CENTER RENTALS $28,597,00 $32,389.11 COMMUNITY CENTER LEASES $30,001.54 $43,012.33 COMMUNITY CENTER THEATRE $ 6,926.50 $ 7,958.63 CLARK BUILDING* $14,457.00 $15,835.25 SPECIAL EVENTS* $14,360.00 $18,995.50 TENNIS COURTS $ 6,792.25 $ 6,227.45 101,134.29 124,418.27 *Finance report groups these two categories under the heading "Other Facilities". 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 1988/89 JANUARY, 1989 REVENUE COMMUNITY CENTER RENTALS $5,569.50 COMMUNITY CENTER LEASES 10,209.00 COMMUNITY CENTER THEATRE 931.00 CLARK BUILDING 2,541.50 SPECIAL EVENTS 1,220.00 TENNIS COURTS 902.50 REVENUE TO DATE: $21,373.50 1/89 1/88 $124,418.27 $101,134.29 REVENUE PROJECTION: PRESENT FISCAL YEAR: $194,500 REVENUE: ACTUAL: LAST FISCAL YEAR: $189,078 COMMUNITY RESOURCES DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND REVENUE FOR 58 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR IS $124,418.27 OR 64 % OF THE PROJECTED FIGURE. COMMUNITY RESOURCES EXPENDITURES FOR 58 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR IS 43.9 % OR $ 190,734.94 HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT JANUARY 1989 OFFENSES REPORTED PERSONS ARRESTED THIS MONTH THIS MONTH ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Murder 0 0 0 0 2. Rape 0 1 0 1 3. Robbery 0 0 0 0 4. Assault 13 5 13 5 5. Burglary 31 33 31 33 6. Larceny 44 39 44 39 7. Motor Vehicle Theft 9 14 9 14 8. DUI 16 36 16 36 9. All Other Offenses 206 351 206 351 PERSONS ARRESTED TRAFFIC REPORT THIS MONTH THIS MONTH ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Adults 64 123 64 123 2. Juveniles 0 0 0 0 3. Criminal Citations 41 60 41 60 4. 5-24/5-42 HBMC 0 * 0 * TRAFFIC REPORT --- _ _- THIS MONTH THIS MONTH ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE ACCIDENTS 0 0 0 0 1. Fatal 2. Injury 15 15 15 15 3. Property damage only 21 20 21 20 CITATIONS 484 324 484 324 1. Traffic Citations 2. Parking Citations 7 21 7 21 CALLS FOR SERVICE - _- - _ - - THIS MONTH THIS MONTH- ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Total Calls 987 ° 1781 987 ° 1781 * figures not available ° these are RCC figures which may have included - items we do not count on our own system. NOTED: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager Res.e tf 11 y Steve Wisni- ski bmitted, Director of Public Safety HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT JANUARY 1989 FIRE STATISTICS PARAMEDIC STATISTICS THIS MONTH THIS MONTH ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Total Calls 97 67 97 67 (TYPE) a. False Alarm 3 6 3 6 b. Mutual Aid 0 1 0 1 c. Paramedic Assists 47 27 47 27 d. Residence Fire 9 6 9 6 e. Commercial Fire 3 0 3 0 f. Vehicle Fire 5 * 5 * g. Hazardous Mtls. 5 * 5 * h. Other 25 27 25 27 PARAMEDIC STATISTICS 1. Mutual Aid THIS MONTH THIS MONTH ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Total Responses 102 94 102 94 (TYPE) a. No Patient/Aid 12 14 12 14 b. Medical 45 39 45 39 c. Trauma 45 40 45 40 1. Mutual Aid 0 0 0 0 2. Auto Accident 16 13 16 13 3. Strand Accident 3 7 3 7 4. Assault 9 14 9 14 5. Jail 6 11 6 11 6. Transports 52 38 52 38 7. Base Hosp.Con. 30 20 30 20 8. Trauma Center 1 0 1 0 INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION THIS MONTH THIS MONTH ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Commercial 62 81 62 81 27 Assembly 0 0 0 0 3. Apartments 6 25 6 25 4, Fumigations 17 16 17 16 5. Institutions 0 0 0 0 6. Industrial 0 5 0 5 * figures not available NOTED: Kevin B. Northcrat, City Manager Director of Public Safety February 21, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of February 28, 1989 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT JANUARY ACTIVITY REPORT Recruitment: * Initiated recruitment for the following open positions: - General Services Officer - Deputy City Engineer * Completed recruitment for Advanced Planner. That position was filled on January 31, 1989. * Conducted and coordinated pre-employment screening of Police and Fire Department applicants. * With the addition of the Administrative Aide position in November, the Department has taken over several areas of the recruitment process which were previously contracted for with L.A. County. This will result in an reduction in the cost of recruitment and testing. * The Department has developed and had printed job bulletin forms for announcing current openings. Labor Relations: * Coordinated disciplinary appeal hearings with the L.A. County Civil Service Commission. * Solicited nominations for "Outstanding Employee" program. Vern Highfield, Public Works Superintendent, was selected for the October -December quarter. * Commenced work on the first issue of an employee newsletter, "Hermosa Highlights". This will allow a vehicle for keeping employees advised of City Council directions, new employees, safety items, benefits, etc. We are looking forward to the first issue in April. Risk Management: * Completed ICRMA Liability insurance renewal forms for July 1, 1989 renewal. * Explored options to present Vehicle Damage insurance coverage. Additional: * Assisting City Manager with the Biltmore Site Citizens Advisory Task Force. Respectfully subm.Ltted, ritAc4,41)(L..zz Noted: Robert A. Blackwood Kevin B. Northcraft Personnel Director City Manager February 2, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council February 28, 1988 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - JANUARY 1988 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION To coordinate and blend the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager; includes engineering and administration of capital improvement projects. Permits Issued: Type This Last FY 88-89 FY Month Month To -date 87-88 Sewer Demolition 1 5 29 46 Sewer Lateral 3 2 10 28 Street Excavation 7 9 43 114 Utility Co's only 42 6 156 276 Dumpster/Lumber Drop 3 2 15 20 Banner Permits 2 0 6 9 ENGINEERING Status of Current Capital Improvement Projects: CIP 85-102/FAU Widen Highland: Council approved authorization to bid. Bids for construction are due on February 23, 1989. County will perform inspection and contract administration services. CIP 85-138/FAU Various Traffic Signal Improvements: Construction in progress. Anticipated completion by early March. CIP 85-160/Concrete Street Repairs: Proposals for design received on January 9, 1989 and are being evaluated. CIP 87-165/Bicycle Path Repairs: Staff has negotiated a credit from the contractor for portions of the work which has a substan- dard appearance. Council accepted work as complete on February 14, 1988. CIP 87-171/Asphalt Street Repairs: Proposals for design received on January 9 and are being evaluated. CIP 86-176/Traffic Control Pre-emption: Construction bids are due on Janaury 23, 1989. CIP 85-202/Hermosa Avenue -Pier Lighting: The street light poles for Pier Avenue have been delivered. Preparation for installa- tion of poles is in progress. CIP 87-405/City-Wide Sewer Replacement: Design is complete. Council awarded bid for construction services on December 13, 1988 to Colich & Sons and awarded inpsection services on December 19, 1988 to James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineer. Construc- tion to start in early March. CIP 87-406/Sanitary Sewer Improvements, Target Area 4: Council to awarded agreement for design services on January 10, 1989, to Harris & Associates for an amount not to exceed $94,050. Antici- pate final design to be completed by mid-June. CIP 87-508/Park Irrigation Restoration: Proposals received on January 9, 1989 for engineering services to determine repairs or upgrading of irrigation systems for the City's parks and medians. CIP 87-606/Police Department Remodel: Council accepted as complete on February 14, 1989. CIP 88-610/Air Conditioning for Community Center Theatre: Council awarded contract on October 11, 1988 to Los Angeles Air Conditioning. Anticipate completion in early May 1989. CIP 88-614/Pier Storm Damage: Construction bids are due on February 23, 1989. MAINTENANCE The maintenance division of the Public Works Department is divided into the following sections: - Parks/Medians - Traffic Safety - Street Maintenance/Sanitation - Building Maintenance - Sewer and Storm Drains - Equipment Service - Street Lighting The Parks Division Work sandblasted and painted the play equipment at Valley Park and replaced sand in the play area. Street Maintenance crew installed motorcycle signs in downtown areas. Bus benches, City-wide, were painted. Assisted the Sewer Division in repairing collapsed sewer main in the 2100 block of Ava. Street Lighting crew removed all the Christmas decorations in the downtown area and City-wide. Replaced security lights in the Police Department and at City Hall. Traffic Safety Division - on-going miscellaneous traffic safety maintenance. Repainted crosswalks and stops. The crew in the sewer and storm drain division performed the on-going tasks of checking and rodding sewer lines, checking the - 2 - pumps and cleared the storm drains on the beach with the bulldozer. Repaired collapsed sewer main 2100 block of Ava and installed new electrical float switches at the 33rd St. and Ingleside pump station. The Building Maintenance Division has completed the painting of the patio area and installation of new plants at City Hall. Looks great! Other projects included installation of ceiling in the Little League snack shack -installation of new ceiling and railing over piano on the stage at the Community Center. Equipment Service - On-going vehicle maintenance, plus the bed of the large dump truck was sandblasted and primed. Respectfully submitted, Anth= y Antich Director of Publ'c Works mon/m Noted: evin B. Northcraft City Manager February 16, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of February 21, 1989 the Hermosa Beach City Council FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, JANUARY 1989 - Revenues and expenditures as of December 31, 1988 are being reviewed and revised for Midyear Review, February 28, 1989. Departments have also submitted some additional appropriation requests. - Meetings were held with MSI, Fritz Stradling and Seidler - Fitzgerald regarding ATSF acquisition. Inquiries were also made to the Independent Cities Lease Financing Authority. - A presentation was made at the request of the Biltmore Site Task Force regarding the financial position of the City. - In conjunction with the Building Department, information for the annual census update by the State Department of Finance was gathered and filed. For the first time, the population will automatically be certified by the State if it is in- creasing. Previously, the City had to request the cert- ification. The census is very important because population is a factor in many state allocation formulas for state sub- ventions such as motor vehicle license fees and cigarette tax. - The firm of Quezada, Navarro and Company, on behalf of SCAG, performed an audit of TDA Bikeway Funds for 1987-88. Funds are being used for repairs to the wall adjacent to the bike- way. STATISTICAL SECTION FISCAL FISCAL JANUARY 1989 JANUARY 1988 YEAR TO YEAR TO DATE 89 DATE 88 CITATION PAYMENTS 4,122 2,867 34,683 33,151 INVOICES 9 15 55 80 CASH RECEIPTS 1,105 929 8,228 8,688 WARRANTS 298 309 1,970 1,836 PURCHASE ORDERS 325 327 2,015 1,921 UUT EXEMPTIONS 595 568 FILED TO DATE PAYROLL FULL TIME 150 144 PART TIME 46 44 Noted: Kevin B. Northc/t City Manager Viki Cope and Finance Administrator 1 February 17, 1989 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL February 28, 1989 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT JANUARY 1989 Staff reports were prepared for the following: 1. 5 4th Quarter General Plan Amendments 2. 1 Zone Change 3. 1 Final Map 4. 1 C.U.P. Amendment 5. 1 C.U.P. Review 6. 1 C.U.P. Appeal (for commercial use) 7. 2 C.U.P.'s for commercial use 8. 2 Appeals of Variance Denials 9. 1 Parking Plan 10. 1 Parking Plan Amendment 11. 1 Text Amendment to eliminate zero lot line in R -2B zones. 12. 1 Special Study of Bus Benches and Shelters 13. 1 Special Study of a maximum of 2 units per lot in R-2 zone 14. 1 Regional Housing Needs Assessment Report 15. 1 MUC Moratorium Report 16. 1 Review of a Grading Plan on Power Street 17. 1 Planning Commission Interpretation of a non -conforming unit 18. 1 Repeal and Rezone of Biltmore Site SPA The following activities were undertaken for transit projects: 1. Routine tasks. Meetings and seminars attended by the Planning Department Staff: 1. 29 meetings Budget Update: Ending 01/31/89, expenditures were 12% below budget for 58% of the year. Ending 01/31/89, revenues were 115% above budget for 58% of the year. 1 Transit Update: "WAVE" Dial -a -Ride Ridership: January 1989 Hermosa Beach riders - 882 Redondo Beach riders - 3901 Satellite point riders - 532 Total: 5315 C.U.P. Enforcement Update: 1. Casey's Isuzu was inspected and found to still bein violation of their C.U.P. A letter was sent notifying them of the City's intent to reinstate C.U.P enforcement. 2. Beach City Jammers was inspected and sent a Second Notice of violation. 3. Lien's Place was inspected and sent a Second Notice of violation. 4. Paradise Sushi was given a last verbal warning regarding their violation. Since that time they have complied. 5. Cantina Real was given a last verbal warning regarding their violation. Since that time they have complied. 6. Hermosa Beach Yacht Club was inspected and no violations were found. POLICE CUP INSPECTIONS: - No violations were reported for Besties, The Lighthouse, the Comedy and Magic Club, California Beach, End Zone, Hermosa Saloon, Hennessey's Tavern, and Pier 52, other than apparent noise violations. * Noise enforcement is pending the Police Department obtaining a noise measuring device. Upcoming agenda items to City Council: 1 Text Amendment regarding nonconforming uses and structures. Respectfully submitted, L%44te l6ee-a.)-2-4-1 f" Ingrid Rademaker Michael Schubach — �'� Planning Aide Director NOTED: n CONCUR: 'Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Honorable Mayor and February 21, 1989 Members of the City Council ACTIVITY REPORT DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY JANUARY, 1988 Attached for your information are recap sheets of department ac- tivity for the month of January. Overall permit activity decreased somewhat in January as the department issued 80 permits of which 25 were building permits. Four permits were issued for single family dwellings and one per- mit was issued for a triplex dwelling. There were twelve permits issued for alterations or additions to existing dwellings. Twelve dwelling units were demolished resulting in a net decrease of five dwelling units to the housing inventory. Building Department general fund revenue for 58.3% of the fiscal year is $250,774.29 or 71% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. The Business License division reports that 267 licenses were is- sued during January resulting in revenue of $36,127.44. Business License revenue to date is $247,833.85 or 49.6% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. The department logged 15 new code enforcement complaints during January of which three were for suspected illegal dwelling units. The department closed two cases during January and has 27 illegal dwelling unit cases under investigation. Noted: 'Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 1 Respectfully Submitted, Director, Bldg. & Safety CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT Month Ending JANUARY, 1988 UMBER OF ERMITS uilding lumbing lectric lan Check ewer Use es. Bldg.Reports omm. Inspections arks & Recreation n lieu Park & Rec. ,oard of Appeals ign Review 'ire Flow Fees LAST MONTH THIS MONTH THIS YEAR TO DATE 5 25 28 22 6 23 8 4 6 0 1 18 25 31 24 13 1 39 12 1 1 0 1 9 234 172 165 102 14 261 109 5 21 1 .15 69 THIS MONTH LAST YEAR LAST YEAR TO DATE 20 19 18 9 1 26 23 0 0 0 1 194 176 144 80 34 191 152 3 19 6 19 'OTALS 186 157 1168 117 1,018 'EES Wilding** 'lumbing :lectric 'Ian Check ;ewer Use .es. Bldg. Reports ;omm. Inspections 'arks & Recreation :n lieu Park & Rec. Soard of Appeals ;ign Review lire Flow Fees 36,643.85 13,782.74 2,336.00 3,372.00 2,720.00 2,703.00 13,681.75 12,284.43 3,578.72 964.55 920.00 1,560.00 200.00 335.00 27,301.00 9,801.00 39,204.00 6,534.00 0 0 25.00 25.00 30,202.59 9,108.50 111,953.51 16,733.00 23,386.00 84,994.67 11,207.62 10,448.00 2,860.00 37,102.00 98,010.00 75.00 325.00 80,316.09 8,406.43 87,746.09 1,237.00 17,137.50 4,070.00 22,634.00 4,866.75 61,924.76 1,155.00 15,038.19 1,040.00 7,630.00 575.00 3,800.00 0 21,000.00 0 123,146.00 0 450.00 25.00 475.00 COTALS 156,812.91 60, 70.22 477,410.89 21,375.18 360,981.54 TALUATIONS 3,511,633 1,182,322 7,504,367 679,356 8,255,115 h*Includes State Seismic Fee $83.24 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED Month of TYPE OF STRUCTURE PERMITS JANUARY, 1988 DWELLING UNITS PROVIDED VALUATION 1. Single Dwellings 4 2. Duplex Dwellings 3. Triplex Dwellings 1 4. Four Units 4 625,172 3 366,000 5. Five Units or More 6. Commercial Buildings 7. Industrial Buildings 8. Publicly Owned Buildings 9. Garages - Residential 10. Accessory Buildings 11. Fences and Walls 12. Swimming Pools 13. Alterations, additions or repairs to dwellings 12 14. Alterations, additions or repairs to Commercial Bldgs. 2 15. Alterations, additions or repairs to indus. bldgs. 16. Alterations, additions or repairs to publicly owned bldgs. 17. Alterations, additions, repairs to garages or accessory bldgs. 18. Signs 164,650 6,000 19. Dwelling units moved 20. Dwelling units demolished 6 -12 21. All other permits not listed 2 20,500 TOTAL PERMITS 27 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: 1,182,322. TOTAL DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED : 7 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DEMOLISHED: 12 NET CHANGE: - 5 NET DWELLING UNIT CHANGE FY 88/89 + 5 CUMULATIVE DWELLING UNIT TOTAL: 10,036 (INCLUDES PERMITS ISSUED) BUSINESS LICENSE REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 1989 TO: Wm. Grove, Building & Safety Director FROM: Mary Fehskens, Administrative Aide DATE: February 8, 1989 NEW BUSINESS LICENSES ISSUED: Out of City License Issued: Home Occupation License Issued: New Business' Opened: New Owners of Existing Business: TOTAL NUMBER OF LICENSES ISSUED: BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWALS MAILED: DELINQUENT NOTICES MAILED: NEW & RENEWAL LICENSES ISSUED: REPORTS SOLD: BUSINESS LICENSE REVENUE: BUSINESS LICENSE REVENUE YEAR-TO-DATE: 36 1 3 1 37 139 94 267 0 $36,127.44 $247,833.85 February 21, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of February 28, 1989 GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT JANUARY ACTIVITY REPORT PARKING ENFORCEMENT 1/88 1/89 87/88FY 88/89FY Parking Cites Issued 7,274 6,532 53,701 42,679 Vehicles Impounded/Booted 50 15 388 292 Calls Responded To 128 119 1,017 862 Booting Revenue $7,717.00 $2,896 $49,989.50 $33,050 ANIMAL CONTROL Citations Issued 96 42 491 362 Warnings Issued 0 0 10 1 Complaints Responded To 29 52 436 331 Total Number of Animals 50 40 407 348 Picked -Up of which: Returned to Owner 10 17 119 98 Taken to Shelter 15 11 124 121 Injured, taken to Vet 1 0 18 14 Deceased 24 12 136 118 CONCUR: Jo oon, Director General Services Kevin B. Northcr City Manager Respectfully submitted, Joan Noon, Director by �� Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide