HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/14/89"Goals are dreams with deadlines."
-Diana Scharf Hunt
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, March 14, 1989 - Council Chambers, City Hall
Closed Session - 7:00 p.m.
Regular Session - 7:30 p.m.
MAYOR
June Williams
MAYOR PRO TEM
Roger Creighton
COUNCILMEMBERS
Jim Rosenberger
Chuck Sheldon
Etta Simpson
All Council meetings
CITY CLERK
Kathleen Midstokke
CITY TREASURER
Gary L. Brutsch
CITY MANAGER
Kevin B. Northcraft
CITY ATTORNEY
James P. Lough
are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND.
Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in
the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City
'Clerk.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:
PROCLAMATIONS: Camp Fire Birthday Week, March 12-18, 1989
Drug & Alcohol Abuse Awareness Month, March 1989
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the
Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Citizens may request to
speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal
Matters at the time the item is called. Citizen comments on
items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction
will be provided time at the end of the agenda. Please limit
comments to three minutes.
Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental
operations are requested to submit those comments to the City
Manager.
APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEM:
A. Designate Mayor for 8 month term ending November
14, 1989
B. Designate Mayor Pro Tempore for 8 month term ending
November 14, 1989
C. Intergovernmental agencies requiring appointment of
Mayor as delegate. Memorandum from City Clerk
Kathleen Midstokke dated March 7, 1989.
- 1 -
1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be
acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con-
sent of the City Council. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by
a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed
will be considered under Agenda Item 3.)
(a)
(b)
Recommendation to approve the following minutes:
1) Regular adjourned meeting of the City Council held
on February 21, 1989;
2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on
February 28, 1989.
Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants
Nos. through inclusive, and
cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City
Treasurer.
(c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future
Agenda Items.
(d) Recommendation to receive and file the January, 1989
revenue and expenditure report. Memorandum from Finance
Administrator Viki Copeland dated March 8, 1989.
(e) Recommendation to receive and file the monthly invest-
ment report for February, 1989. Memorandum from City
Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated March 1, 1989.
(f)
•(g)
(h)
(i)
(3)
Recommendation to adopt a resolution approving the in-
stallation of stop controls on Sixth Street at Loma
Drive to create a four way stop (stop signs). Memoran-
dum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated
February 27, 1989.
Recommendation to adopt a resolution ordering the prepa-
ration of a report for the formation of the Hermosa
Beach Street Lighting District No. 1989-1990. (Annual
renewal) Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony
Antich dated February 27, -1989.
Recommendation to adopt. a resolution ordering the prepa-
ration of a report for the formation of the Hermosa
Beach Crossing Guards Maintenance District for Fiscal
Year 1989-1990. (Annual renewal) Public Works Director
Anthony Antich dated February 27, 1989.
Recommendation to approve the request of the Kiwanis
Club for the operation of a Christmas Tree Lot on the
front lawn of the Community Center for the holidays of
1989. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Ala-
na Mastrian-Handman dated February 27, 1989.
Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the
City of Hermosa Beach and the South Bay Free Clinic Teen
Advocate Center for office space in the Community Cen-
ter. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana
Mastrian-Handman dated March 1, 1989.
(k) Recommendation to approve.lease agreement between the
City of Hermosa Beach and the Salvation Army for office
space in the Community Center. Memorandum from Communi-
ty Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dated March
1, 1989.
(1)
(m)
(n)
(o)
(r)
(s)
Recommendation to receive and file Prospect School
update. Memorandum from Community Resources Director
Alana Mastrian-Handman dated February 27, 1989.
Recommendation to approve Spring/Summer Beach Volleyball
Requests. Memorandum from Community Resources Director
Alana Mastrian-Handman dated March 1, 1989.
Recommendation to deny claims for damages and refer to
City's insurance adjusters, as follows:
1) Dino and Helen Vlachos, 17911 Shamley Cr.,
Huntington Beach, CA 92649, filed 2/21/89, alleged
deprivation of fair property value;
2) Henry M. Perez, 1017 17th Street, Hermosa Beach,
filed 2/25/89, alleged bike accident at Pier and
Ardmore.
Recommendation to adopt the following resolutions:
1) Resolution establishing certain streets and por-
tions of streets throughout the City as white
zones;
2) Resolution establishing certain streets and por-
tions of streets throughout the City as Loading
Zones (yellow zones);
3) Resolution establishing certain streets and por-
tions of streets throughout the City as 15 minute
Parking Zones (green zones).
Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich
dated February 16, 1989.
Recommendation to approve award of bid for Highland
Avenue widening, CIP 85-102. Memorandum from Public
Works Director Anthony Antich dated March 6, 1989.
Recommendation to reject bids and readvertise for new
bids on signal pre-emption (CIP 86-176). Memorandum
from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated March 6,
1989.
Recommendation to reject bid for installation of Com-
munity Center fire alarm system, CIP 88-604. Memorandum
from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated March 6,
1989.
Recommendation to receive and file communication from
Planning Commission re. the time of Planning Commission
meetings. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated March 8, 1989.
Recommendation to ratify insurance of high value emer-
gency vehicles with the California Public Entity Mobile
Equipment program. Memorandum from Risk Manager Robert
Blackwood dated March 7, 1989.
3
(AO
(v)
Recommendation to approve contract between the City of
Hermosa Beach and the Community Development Commission
of the County of Los Angeles for the execution of the
CDBG.program. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager
Alana Mastrian-Handman dated March 1, 1989.
Recommendation to award contract for Municipal Pier
storm damage repair (CIP 88-614). Memorandum from
Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated March 6,
1989.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES.
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 89-975 - AN ORDINANCE DELETING A PORTION
OF SECTION 551 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING ZERO
SIDE YARD SETBACKS WITHIN R -2B ZONES AND AN ENVIRONMEN-
TAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption.
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC.
(a) Letter from Mrs. Laurie Roberts, 1656 Bayview Drive,
Hermosa Beach, dated January 27, 1989 requesting a
moratorium prohibiting remodeling of nonconforming
structures.
SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS
5. REVIEW OF GRADING PLAN FOR POWER STREET SUBDIVISION,
TRACT #30986. Memorandum from Public Works Director
Anthony Antich dated March 2, 1989.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M.
NONE
HEARINGS
6. PLANNING COMMISSION POLICY STATEMENT CONFIRMATION AND
STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR MORATORIUM REGARDING REMODELL-
ING AND EXPANSION OF NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES AND/OR
USES. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated March 6, 1989.
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
7. REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF A CA-
NINE PROGRAM FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. Memorandum from
Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated March 6,
1989. .
8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items:
(a)
(b)
(c)
Request by Councilmember Williams for discussion re.
controlling skateboarding in parking lots.
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to
discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back
on a future agenda; or 3).resolution of matter by Coun-
cil action tonight.
Request by Councilmember Sheldon for attendance records
review of standing appointive bodies. Memorandum from
City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated March 9, 1989.
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis-
cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a
future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council
action tonight.
Request by Councilmember Williams for discussion re.
authority for Council to call up for review decisions of
appointed boards.
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis-
cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a
future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council
action tonight.
(d) Request by Councilmember Williams for discussion of the
open space ballot initiative.
(e)
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis-
cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a
future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council
action tonight.
Request by Mayor Rosenberger for discussion of downtown
development, historic preservation, and parking in -lieu
fees.
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis-
cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a
future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council
action tonight.
11. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS
Citizens wishing to address the Council on items not on
the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction may do
so at this time.
ADJOURNMENT C
5
•
CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS
MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY
OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M.
CLOSED FRIDAYS
Where there is no vision the people perish...
•
HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are
participating in the process of representative government. Your
government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the
City Council meetings often.
It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new
items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by
the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have
all matters covered within the time allowed.
CITY VISION
A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile,
financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct
business district and' residential neighborhoods that are afforded
full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by
visitor/users; ledby a City Council which accepts a stewardship
role for community resources and displays a willingness to
explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy
leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council
is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa
Beach for tomorrow's challenges today.
Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986
NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers
.4.
TSE'HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT
Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap-
pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The -
Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager, operating through
the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration
is conaidsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the
United States today.
GLOSSARY
•
The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen-
das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council.
• Consent Items
A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re-
quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this
listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal-
endar items Removed For Separate Discussion.
Public Hearings
Public Hearings are held on -certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford
the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the
matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City -Clerk, prior
to the Hearing.
Hearings
Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal
requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing.
Ordinances
An ordinance is a law that regulates government•revenues and/or public conduct. All
ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into
the records. At least one week later.Council•may adopt, reject or hold over the
ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the
second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive
the time requirements.
Written Communications
The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally
communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed
with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting.
Miscellaneous Items and Reports r.City Manager
The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention
of, or for action by the City Council.-
. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda.
usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday.
Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council
Members of the City Council may place items on'the agenda for consideration by the
full Council.
Other Matters - City Council
These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication
of the Agenda.
Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature
Citizens wishing to address the City Council -on an urgency matter not elsewhere con-
sidered on the agenda may do so at this time.
Parking Authority
The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity. -but is operated as an inte-
gral part of the City government.
Vehicle Parking District No. 1
The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur-
pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro-
mote public parking in the central business district. •
• Z -
1
March 7, 1989
City Council Meeting
March 14, 1989
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEM
AND
CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION - MARCH 1989
Consistent with the City Council policy of a nine-month rotation
of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore, the following appointments should
be made:
1. Mayor for a term ending November 14, 1989.
2. Mayor Pro Tempore for a term ending November 14, 1989.
Recommendations after appointment of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore
consistent with policy of maintaining permanent representatives
whenever possible, are: •
1. To appoint Councilmember Simpson delegate and Mayor
Williams alternate to the city selection committee of
SCRTD, and to adopt Resolution No. 89- entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING A MEMBER OF SAID COUNCIL
OF SAID CITY TO THE CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE OF THE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO
PART 3 OF DIVISION 10 OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE."
2. To appoint Mayor Williams to the Los Angeles County/City
Selection Committee.
3. To.appoint Mayor Williams to the South Bay Cities
Sanitation District Board of Directors, and
Councilmember Simpson alternate director.
4. To appoint Councilmember Simpson as delegate and Mayor
Williams as alternate to the Inglewood Fire Training
Authority. (They meet immediately following the
Sanitation District meeting.)
This will enable Councilmember Simpson to continue to represent
the city on allof the above committees except the Los Angeles
County/City Selection Committee, which requires, council action
for each meeting when an delegate is designated other than the
Mayor.
1
a
Enclosed for your information are current committee assignments
as of July 26, 1988.
Following appointment/reappointment, letters will be sent to the
appropriate boards and commissions. You will receive a list of
the newly appointed members.
KA771(&)
T EEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk
CONCUR:
l:14EVI B. NOR cT° CITY MANAGER
2
Date: August 8, 1988
CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION OF DELEGATES, ALTERNATE
APPOINTMENTS AND/OR REAPPOINTMENT
Appointments made:
Beach Cities Coalition for Drug Free Youth
Delegate Williams
Beach Cities Committee
Delegate Sheldon
Delegate Rosenberger
Commuter Transportation Implementation Plan Steering Committee
Delegate Creighton
Alternate Rosenberger
Independent Cities Association
Delegate Simpson
Alternate Rosenberger
Independent Cities Risk Management Association
Delegate Sheldon Resolution No. 87-5095
Alternate Blackwood
Inglewood Fire Training Authority Commission (same as South Bay
Sanitation District)
Delegate Simpson
Alternate Rosenberger
League of California Cities - Board of Directors
Delegate Rosenberger
Alternate Williams
Los Angeles County/City Selection Committee (must appoint alter-
nate separately each time if unable to attend when meeting is
called.)
Mayor Rosenberger
1
Sister City Association, Inc.
Delegate Williams
Alternate Sheldon
South Bay Cities Association
Delegate Simpson
Delegate Williams
South Bay Cities Sanitation District (County Sanitation Districts
of Los Angeles County) (Same as Inglewood Fire Training Auth.)
Delegate Rosenberger
Alternate Simpson
South Bay Corridor Study Steering Committee
Delegate Williams
Alternate Simpson
South Bay Juvenile Diversion Project
Delegate Sheldon
Alternate Creighton
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
Delegate Simpson
Alternate Sheldon
Southern California Rapid Transit District (by Resolution)
Delegate
Simpson Resolution No. 88-5163
Alternate Rosenberger
West Basin Water Association
Delegate Simpson
8-8-88
2
SUBCOMMITTEES
Business Relations
Councilmember
Councilmember
Rosenberger
Williams
City -School District Relations
Councilmember Creighton
Councilmember Simpson
Coordinating Council
Councilmember Williams
Councilmember Sheldon
Fire and Police Relations
Councilmember Williams
Councilmember Creighton
Planning
Councilmember Sheldon
Councilmember Rosenberger
Railroad Right -of -Way
Councilmember Rosenberger
Councilmember Simpson
Litigation (Temporary)
Councilmember Creighton
Councilmember Sheldon
Fire Flow Fee (Temporary)
Councilmember Rosenberger
Councilmember Williams
8-8-88
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
.21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING A MEMBER OF SAID COUNCIL OF SAID CITY TO
THE CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID
TRANSIT DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO PART 3 OF DIVISION 10 OF THE PUBLIC
UTILITIES CODE. •
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That pursuant to the Southern California
Rapid Transit District Law, being Part 3 of Division 10 of the
Public Utilities Code of the State of California, the City
Council does hereby appoint the following member of said Council
as a'member to the City Selection Committee:
Delegate: Councilmember Etta Simpson
Alternate: Mayor June Williams
SECTION 2. That the within resolution shall become
operative and the appointment made by Section 1 hereof shall be
effective as of March 14, 1989.
SECTION 3. That immediately after the effective date of
the appointment hereby made, the City Clerk shall without delay
forward a copy of this resolution, together with notice of the
appointment made hereby, to the Secretary of the Southern Calif-
ornia Rapid Transit District.
SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of this resolution; shall cause the action of the City
Council in adopting same to be entered in the official minutes of
said City Council; and shall retain this resolution, duly signed
by the proper City officials in the official records of the City.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MARCH 1989.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and
MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
SCRIPT FOR ROTATION OF MAYOR
1. OUTGOING MAYOR ROSENBERGER'S COMMENTS
2. MOTIONS TO APPOINT JUNE WILLIAMS AS MAYOR AND ROGER
CREIGHTON AS MAYOR PRO TEM FOR TERMS ENDING 11-14-89
3. SWAP SEATS AND NAMEPLATES (SEE ATTACHED)
4. PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE TO OUTGOING MAYOR ROSENBERGER BY NEW
MAYOR WILLIAMS
5. MOTION8 TO...(SEE 4 ACTIONS RECOMMENDED IN CITY CLERK'S
MEMO)
6. INCOMING MAYOR WILLIAMS' COMMENTS
7. BREAK - COFFEE AND COOKIES
8. REFER TO AGENDA - CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Time of Planning Commission Meetings
DATE: March 8, 1989
The Planning Commission adopted a new time for starting their
regular meetings from 7:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.
The intent is to have meetings adjourn earlier in the evening.
ML Video has indicated that the change will not cause difficul-
ties with broadcasting the meetings.
The change in meeting time will commence on May 2, 1989.
oficig/5*P‘e-
March 6, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council March 14, 1989
AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR MUNICIPAL PIER REPAIRS, CIP 88-614
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council:
1. Authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with Diversified
Repair Service, Inc. at a cost not to exceed $91,860.
2. Appropriate $123,692 from the General.Fund Designation for
Capital Improvements to CIP 88-614.
3. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary.
Background:
On Jauary 24, 1989, City Council authorized staff to advertise
for construction bids on this project. The project will repair
damage caused by the January 17, 1988 storm to the Pier. The
work involves moving the end pile cap (which is now shifted) back
to its original position and reconnecting it. In addition the
five piles with cracks will be repaired with epoxy and concrete
collars will be placed around two of the piles with the worst
cracks.
Analysis:
The analysis is divided into the following sections:
1. The Bids
2. Reference Check
3. The Lowest Cost and Most Responsible Bidder
4. Fiscal Impact
5. Contract Administration & Inspection
1. .The Bids
Four sealed bids were received by the City Clerk on February 23,
1989. The bids were publicly opened and read aloud. The bid
results were as follows:
1. Diversified Repair Service, Inc. $ 83,509 (-2.5%)*
2. John L. Meek Construction Company 130,660 (+ 53%)
3. General Construction Company 139,705 (+ 63%)
4. Healy Tibbits Construction Company 162,900 (+ 90%)
Engineer's Estimate $ 85,650
* All bids are available for review at the office of the City
Clerk.
2. Reference Check
Five references were questioned to determine the low bidder's
qualifications. Diversified Repair Service, a valid license
(#530001 General Engineering) with the State of California; no
violations have been filed against the firms.
3. The Lowest Cost and Most Responsible Bidder
Diversified Repair Service is the lowest cost bidder. The
reference questionnaire indicates that Diversified Repair Service
is qualified to do this type of work, finishing on schedule,
within budget and producing quality work.
4. Fiscal Impact:
Contractor Amount Not to Exceed:
Contractor Bid
10% Contingency
Not to Exceed
$83,509
8,351
$91,860
Below is an estimate of project costs:
Amount Anticipated Additional
Amount Spent To Expenditures Funds
Budgeted Date Thru 6/30/89 Required
Preliminary
Engineering $17,500 $16,163 $16,163 $ <1,337>
Design 16,800 17 16,800 -0-
Construction -0- -0- 83,509 83,509
Inspection -0- .-0- 30,340 30,340
Subtotal $34,300 $16,180 $146,812 $112,512
Contingency 3,500 416 14,680 11,180
Total $37,800 $16,596 $161,492
$123,692
2
$123,692 are required from the General Fund since FEMA and the
State Wildlife Board will not reimburse any expenses until after
the project has been completed.
Potential Funding Source:
General Fund, Designation for Capital
Improvements Fund Balance 6/30/89
Appropriation to CIP 88-614
New Fund Balance 6/30/89
$ 443,165
123,692
$ 319,473
Below is an estimated funding distribution for this project.
State
Total Wildlife
Cost FEMA City Fund
Preliminary
Engineering $ 16,163 $ -0- $ 16,163 $ -0-
Design 16,800 10,500 6,300 -0-
Construction 83,509 62,631 10,439 10,439
Inspection 30,340 22,754 3,793 3,793
Subtotal $146,812 $ 95,885 $ 36,695 $ 14,232
"Contingency 14,680 -0- 7,340 7,340
Total $161,492 $ 95,885 $ 44,035 $ 21,572
This project is eligible for reimbursement by FEMA at a maximum
of 75%. FEMA eligible costs do not include preliminary
engineering or contingency. ($2,800 of contingency included in
design is not FEMA eligible.)
The Wildlife Conservation Board of the Department of Fish and
Game will share up to $30,000 in non -FEMA (Federal Emergency
Management Agency) costs with the City on a matching basis. The
Board has a financial interest in the Pier as it provided funding
when the Pier was built in 1965. Currently an agreement is in
effect until August 20, 2003 with the State of California for the
maintenance of the Pier. The Board can only fund on a matching
basis with City funding; matching with funds from other State
agencies is not allowed. Preliminary engineering and design
costs are not eligible for reimbursement by the State Wildlife
Board, therefore the City must bear non -FEMA costs.
The Office of Emergency Services of the State of California
cannot provide State disaster funding since the Pier is
recreational and not primarily commercial.
5. Contract Administration & Inspection
Staff will return to City Council with information regarding the
contract administration and inspection for this project. Moffatt
& Nichol, Engineers have submitted a preliminary proposal which
is being evaluated.
Alternatives:.
Alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council
are:
1. Reject the low bidder and award to the second low bidder
(this would require approximately $52,000 in additional
funds.)
Respectfully submitted,
•Concur:
Brian Gengle Anthony Antich
Assistant Engineer Director of Pu•lic Works
Concur:
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
4.4.Ca7-p/44-A.4L__
evin B. Northc1? ft Viki Copeland
City Manager
Attachments: Project Schedule
ty/acmpr
Finance Administrator
I
CONSTRUI.' ON SCHEDULE
PROJECT NAME :
Pier Storm Damage
LEGEND
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : immummemm
ACCOUNT NUMBER : 001-401-8614-4201 ACTUAL SCHEDULE :
X : 100% COMPLETE
1
TASKS JAN I FEB MAR I APR 1 MAY JUN 1 JUL I I
AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
I
111 I---- I I I I I
Final design approval before advertising
for construction r
1 1 1 1 1 1
Prepare advertisement & set bid opening uuliuiul
date NM Advertising period ! .iLaseI I I I I
(issue addendums as necessary)
1 1II.1 1 1 1 I
Accept sealed bids & public bid opening
II
Review bids i I III I 1 1 1
Award contract I I I I 1 I I
„
Sign contract
1 1 I II I 1 1 1 .r1
(bonds insurance & workers comp. cert.)
1 11 �� I 1 1 1 I
Preconstruction meeting procedure
1 1. I 1 1 1 1 1
Issue "Notice to Proceed" 11
Construction Period I I JessaIusisealluu,I 1 1 I I I
Monitor progress & maintain records I I �5�������� j�� ������� I I I 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 ussimuuuuu inisiuuu, I I I I I
Progress payment and
change order procedure
I I 1 I------1 I I I
Acceptance of work as complete
1' 1 1 1 1 1 II I I I
Issusing and recording a
"Notice of Completion"
Retention Payment I I I 1 1 I I I I I
Project close out I I 1 I uuIilhuIIuIuuuuI, I I I I
1------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES
March 7, 1989
City Council Meeting
March 14, 1989
The following claim(s) have been submitted to the City Clerk's
office:
Dino & Helen Vlachos - 11791 Shamley Circle, Huntington
Beach, CA, 92649, filed February 23, 1989; alleged depri-
'►ation of fair property value.
Henry M. Perez - 1017 17th St., Hermosa Beach, CA 90254,
filed February 23, 1989; alleged bicycle accident.
Recommendation:
To deny claim(s) and refer to City's Claims Administrator.
Note: The above claim(s) are available for review in the office
of the City Clerk.
Concur:
KATHLEEN MIDSTORRE, City Clerk
EVI B. NORTHCRrAFT, City Manager
In
l
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C/7 "(d -'
CLAIM
v �.-• ,
__
-- �+
In the Matter of the Claim of DINO and HELEN VLAC 1Oby,-'16,1,zYi'mantv.
I \ j
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISSI
1 through 20, Inclusive.
Claimants hereby present their claim pursuant to California
Government Ccde, Section 910.
1. The Post Office address of claimants is: 17911
Shamley Cr., Huntington Beach, CA 92649. All notice of
action on this claim should be sent to said address.
2. Claimants own the following described real property
in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of
California: Commonly described as 1922 Hillcrest Dr. Hermosa
Beach, CA, and more particularly described as Lot 21 and 22,
Tract 1965; Assessor's No. 4184009012.
3. On or about November 22, 1988 the above described
property was merged from two lots to one, thus depriving
claimants of the total use of one lot for purposes of building
a single family residence thereon.
4. Claimant is unaware of the true names Does 1 through
20, inclusive, and therefore makes this claim against them by
such fictitious names, and claimants will seek to insert their
names and capacities when same has been ascertained.
//
//
//
//
-1-
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2.6
27
28
5. At the time of presentation of this claim, claimants
demand just compensation, as required by the California
Constitution, Article I, Section 19, in the amount of
$250,000.00 computed on the basis of the property's fair
market value.
DATED: February 6, 1989
c -e
DINO VLACHOS HELEN VLACHOS
.11
. . U 1 -L1 "...
LIABILITY
CITY CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PRO Yr -tel'
f 'p
MAIL TC: City Clerk
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa 3eacn, CA 90254
COPIES TO:
1. Claims for death. injury to persons. or to personal property, must be filed not later than six (6) moths atter theoctdrrerrc
(Gov. Code. Sec. 911.2).
2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later
3. Read entire claim before filing.
4. Attach separate sheets. if necessary, to give full details.
3 -
Name of Clamant (First. Last. Middle) . Age
Henry Perez M i 32
Home Address of Claimant (Street, City. State. Zip) i Telephone No
1017 17th St. Hermosa Beach CA. 90254( 211 318-6775
Business Address of Cta�;ant,(Street� City. S te. Zip) Te ephone No
93 N Douglas, ET Segundo, CA 90245 (211) E47-1070
Address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim:
1351 Third Street Promenade Ste. 301 Santa Monica. CA 90401
Date of Damage/Loss/In)ury
5 Sestember 1988
Time
A.M. 6:0!M.P.M.
Place of Damage/Loss/Injury
Hermosa Beach, CA.
How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be specific) M r . Perez was riding his bike when the front t i rte
became stuck in a drain grate. Mr. Perez was then thrown over the handle bars,
his face hitting the cement.
Were Police at scene? Yes E NogG:
Were Paramedics at scene? Yes Xu NoO
Report No.
What particular act or omission do you claim caused the damage/loss/injur The 1 a c k of room, cars were not al
lowing Mr. Per2z to proceed en his bicycle. There was no alternative, but to
find room to the right of the cars, where the gratings were positioned.
Name of City employee(s) causing the damage/loss/injury:
Is the total amount of your claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage, or loss:
less than $10,000.00 If so, state the amount 0 more than $25,000.00 (Superior Court Jurisdiction)
more than $10,000.00 but Tess than $25,000.00 - (Municipal Court Jurisdiction)
How was amount of claim computed? (Be specific. List doctor bills, wage rate, repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2) estimates.
foctor bills, Emotional Distress, Permanent Scar on Face
Expenditures made because of damage/loss/injury (Date and Item). Medical Expenditures
THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE.
Expenditures made because of damageiloss/injury (Date and item)
9%21!83
$500.00 various medical services.
Name and address of •mtness(es). doctor(s). and hospital(s): Angel Bishop 1 5 2 3 olden, Hermosa Bch. C A . 9 G
Or. Garland 3500 W. Lomita Ste.200, Torrance,CA. South Bay Hospital at
514 N. Prospect Ave. Redondo Beach,CA. 90277
PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY.
For all vehicle damage claims, draw a diagram with the names of streets, and indicate place of incident by 'X' and by show-
ing house numbers or distances to street corners.
If City Vehicle was involved, designate by tetter 'A' location of City Vehicle and by 'B' location of yourself or your vehicle.
If Personal or property damage claim please identify location as completely as possible.
N
CLAIMS INVOLVING VEHICLES
w
$
qA7
Sou, -it.
,v7' 0,
cxce/
CLAIMS - OTHER
(Please draw diagram)
I HAVE READ THE FOREGOING CLAIM AND KNOW THE CONTENTS THEREOF: AND CERTIFY THAT THE SAME IS TRUE OF MY
OWN KNOWLEDGE EXCEPT AS TO THOSE MATTERS WHICH ARE HEREIN STATED UPON MY INFORMATION AND BELIEF: AND
AS TO THOSE MATTERS I BELIEVE IT TO BE TRUE. 1 DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE
AND CORRECT.
Dated February 22, 1989
-1"l/)'t• . • t-4, - ( Dr
Signed �f
NOTE: PRESENTATION OF A FALSE CLAIM IS PUNISHABLE AS A FELONY (CAL. PEN. CODE 72).
February 16, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council March 14, 1989
RESOLUTION LISTING ALL EXISTING WHITE ZONES, LOADING ZONES
(YELLOW ZONE) AND 15 MINUTE PARKING (GREEN ZONE) THROUGHOUT THE
CITY
Recommendation:
•
It is recommended that City Council:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 89- , of the City
City of Hermosa Beach establishing certain
portions of streets throughout the City as
2. Adopt Resolution No. 89- , of the City
City of Hermosa Beach establishing certain
portions of streets throughout the City as
(yellow zones).
3. Adopt Resolution No. 89- • , of the City
City of Hermosa Beach establishing certain
portions of streets throughout the City as
Zones (Green Zones)
Background:
As part of the Department's on-going
that an update of Resolution NS 2435
2435 defines and establishes traffic
Traffic Control
Council of the
streets and
white zones.
Council of the
streets and
Loading Zones
Council of the
streets and
15 Minute Parking
review it was determined
is necessary. Resolution NS
control throughout.the City.
1. Stop Intersections
2. One-way Streets
3. Fifteen Minute Parking Zones -Streets
4. Loading Zones
5. White Zones
6. One Hour Parking Limit Zones -Streets
7. Through Streets
8. No Parking Areas
9. No Stopping Zones
10. Twelve Hour Limit Parking -Streets
11. Right-of-way Prohibited to Vehicles
12. No Parking During School Hours
1
Status of Review
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
In Progress
In Progress
Not Complete
1 u
The stop sign and one-way streets reviews have been completed.
The other sections of Resolution NS 2435 need additional review
and as work is completed staff will present the results.
Analysis:
The analysis is divided into the following sections:
1. Resolution NS 2435 - White Zones - Loading and 15 Minute
Parking Zones
2. Engineering Review
3. Sign Maintenance
4. Fiscal Impact
5. Summary
1. Resolution NS 2435 - White Zones - Loading and 15 Minute
Parking Zones
NOTE: No NEW white zones, loading or 15 minute parking zones are
being proposed
Resolution NS 2435 was first approved by to City Council on July
3, 1962. This resolution is governed by Ordinance NS 238 which
was adopted by City Council on June 6, 1962.
A search of the records and files in the City revealed that the
list of white zones, loading and 15 minute parking zones within
Resolution NS 2436, has never been updated. There exists no
complete resolution listing all existing white zones, loading or
15 minute parking zone locations. A complete listing is
necessary for the efficient operation of both office and field
crews, reduced potential liability and proper upkeep of city
records.
2. Engineering Review
A: WHITE ZONES
A field inventory was performed and there are seven existing
white zones. (White means no stopping, standing or parking
for any purpose other than loading or unloading of
passengers, or for the purpose of depositing mail in an
adjacent mail box, which shall not exceed three (3) minutes
and the
restrictions apply between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. of any day
except Sunday and Holidays and except as follows:
a. When such zone is in front of a hotel or in front of a
mailbox the restrictions shall apply at all time.
b. When such zone is adjacent to the entrance or exit of a
theater the restrictions shall apply at all time except
when such theater is closed.)
No new white zones are proposed at this time.
B: YELLOW ZONES
There are 14 existing loading zones. Yellow zones mean no
stopping, standing or parking at any time between 7:00 a.m.
and 6:00 p.m. of any day except Sundays and Holidays for any
purpose other than the loading or unloading of passengers or
materials, provided that the loading or unloading of
passengers shall not consume more than three (3) minutes nor
the loading or unloading of materials more than twenty (20)
minutes.
No new loading zones are proposed at this time.
C: GREEN ZONES
There are 15 existing 15 minute parking zones. Green zones
mean no standing or parking for a period of time longer than
15 minutes at any time between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on
any day. No new 15 minute parking zones are proposed at this
time.
3. Sign Maintenance
No additional signage is required at this time.
4. Fiscal Impact
No additional appropriation is necessary.
5. Summary
All existing white zones, loading and 15 minute parking zones
were inventoried
No new white zones,
being proposed
loading and 15 minute parking zones are
3
White zones, loading and 15 minute parking zones were
evaluated for proper signage
No additional signage is required at this time
Alternatives:
Other alternatives available to City Council and considered by
Staff:
1. Do nothing.
2. Modify the white zones, loading and 15 minute parking zones
list.
Respectfully submitted:
- y eaton
Engineering Technician
Concur:
_ 014
Ant'•ny Antich
Director of Pub is Works
/Kevin B. No'rthcraft
City Manager
42,
Steve Wisniewski
Director of Public Safety
•
Attachments: - Map and List of Existing White Zones, Loading
and 15 Minute Parking Zones
- Resolution No. 89- , 89- and 89- ,
Establishing White Zones, Loading and 15 Minute
Parking Zones (to be adopted by City Council)
ty/ows
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CERTAIN PORTIONS OF STREETS AS 15 MINUTE
PARKING ZONES (GREEN ZONES)
WHEREAS, Section 11 and 11.1 of Ordinance 238 (Traffic Code)
provides that City Council, -by Resolution, establish 15 Minute
Parking zones. (Hermosa Beach Municipal Code 19-76)
WHEREAS, an engineering review has been performed.
WHEREAS, the section titled "15 Minute Parking Zones" of
Resolution N.S. 2435 needs updating.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Rescind the 15 Minute Parking Zones section from
Resolution No. 2435 and creating a new resolution of 15 Minute
Parking Zones. Exhibit III attached.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this
day of , 1989.
PRESIDENT of the CITY COUNCIL and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California
ATTEST: !L• PROVED AS TO FO
CITY CLERK
Y ATTORN
SECTION 11.1 GREEN CURB MARRING
Fifteen Minute Parking Zones - Streets
The Streets or portions of• streets in this City hereinafter
described in sections numbered 11.1 to the left of the decimal
point are hereby defined and established as Fifteen Minute
Parking Zones and shall be governed by the provisions of Section
11 and Section 11.1 of Ordinance No. N.S. 238.
(The numbers to the right of decimal in the section numbers below
serve to identify the street as such street is shown on the
Master List of Streets on file in the office of the City
Engineer.)
Fourteenth Street, north side, between 185' and 203' west of
Hermosa Avenue
Hermosa Avenue, West side, between 12' and 30' north of 15th
Court
Hermosa Avenue, west side, between 100' and 222' south of Second
Street
Hermosa Avenue, east side, between 260' an 278' north of Pier
Avenue
Hermosa Avenue, east side, between 190' and 210' north of Tenth
Street
Hermosa Avenue, westside, between 10' and 28' south of thirtieth
court
Hermosa Avenue, west side, between 90' and 110' north of Eleventh
Street
Longfellow Avenue, south side, between 33' and 52' west of
Manhattan Avenue
Longfellow Avenue, north side, between 18' and 37' west of
Manhattan Avenue
Manhattan Avenue, east side, between 16' and 55' north of
Twenty -Seventh Street
Manhattan Avenue, west side, between 5' and 20' north of
Thirty -Second Place
Manhattan Avenue, west side, between 7.5' and 25.5' south of
Greenwich Avenue
1
Pier Avenue, north side, between 27' and 47' east of Beach Drive
Pier Avenue, south side, between 79' and 92' west of Hermosa
Avenue
Pier Avenue, south side, between 130' and 145' west of Hermosa
Avenue
•
CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH
CAILEFORMIA.
FIFTEEN miNUTE PARKIWOZONES
SCALE: I INCH•400 FEET
•
•
sm:••--;-•
LJL
1 '1
••••••••
7
z..... 1
1 ii -_-3 IL .....„.. ,
. .
0 ' 0
Ili _12 it I
1
2
3
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
4
5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CERTAIN PORTIONS OF STREETS LOADING ZONE
6 (YELLOW ZONES)
7
8
9
10
11
12
•
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
WHEREAS, Section 12 and 12.1 of Ordinance 238 (Traffic Code)
provides that City Council, by Resolution, establish Loading
zones. (Hermosa Beach Municipal Code 19-85)
WHEREAS, an engineering review has been performed.
WHEREAS, the section titled "Loading Zones" of Resolution N.S.
2435 needs updating.
•
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Rescind the Loading Zones section from
Resolution No. 2435 and creating a new resolution of Loading
Zones. Exhibit II attached.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
, 1989.
22 II PRESIDENT of the CITY COUNCIL and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California
23
24
25
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
26 /
27
28
SECTION 12 Loading Zones
The Streets or portions of streets in this City hereinafter
described in Sections numbered 12 in the first digit are hereby
defined and established as loading zones and shall be governed by
the provisions of Section 12.1 (A)2 of Ordinance No. N.S. 238.
(The numbers to the right of the decimal in the section numbes
below serve to identify the street as such street is shown on the
master list of streets on file in the office of the City
Engineer.)
Bard Street, on the west curb between a point 46'6" to 140' south
of Pier Avemue
Cypress Avenue on the west curb between a point 10' to 34' south
of Pier Avenue
14th Stret, on the north curb between a point 229' to 245'
of Hermosa Avenue
Hermosa Avenue, on the west
south of 22nd Street
Hermosa Avenue, on the west
south of 16th Court
Hemosa Avenue, on the east
north of 8th Street
Hemosa Avenue, on the east
north of 8th Street
west •
curb between a point 25' to 48'
curb betweeen a point 15' to 34'
curb between a point 111' to 131'
curb between a point 271' to 288'
Hermosa Avenue, on the east curb between a point 44' to 80' south
of Pier Avenue
Hermosa Avenue, on the east curb between a point 36' to 54' south
of 2nd Street
Hermosa Avenue on the east curb between a point 44' to 54' north
of 10th Street
Hermosa Avenue on the east curb between a point 236' to 261'
north of 10th Street
Herondo Street on the north curb between a point 276' to 312'
east of Monterey Boulevard
9th Street, on the south curb between a point 14' to 49' west of
Pacific Coast Highway
Pier Avenue, on the south curb between a point 25' to 42' east of
Hermosa Avenue
Pier Avenue, on the south curb between a point 49' to 61' east of
Loma Drive
2nd Street, on the north curb betwen a point 60' to 165' west of
Pacific Coast Highway
22nd Street, on the north curb between a point 15' to 40' east of
Beach Drive
CITY OF
HERNIOSA BEACH
CA.1.1[FORNE A.
LOADING ZONES
:ALE I INCHs400 FEET
•
,-:•=za•
LI
11
1—,
• OM II •
•
•
r ' .•••••••••
• ;
"2. ----
-.1
•
•
Cr! t•f==-
,i
,
•
•
1
2
3
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
4
5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CERTAIN PORTIONS OF STREETS AS WHITE
ZONES.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
WHEREAS, Section 12 and 12.1 of Ordinance 238 (Traffic Code)
provides that City Council, -by Resolution, establish white zones.
(Hermosa Beach Municipal Code 19-86)
WHEREAS, an engineering review has been performed.
WHEREAS, the section titled "White Zones" of Resolution-H.S.
2435 needs updating.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Rescind the White Zones section from Resolution
No. 2435 and creating a new resolution of White Zones. Exhibit I
attached.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this
day of , 1989.
PRESIDENT of the CITY COUNCIL and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California
ATTEST: ( \ APPROVE
CITY CLERK
26 /
27
28
TY ATTO
SECTION 12A White Zones
The Streets or portions of streets in this City hereinafter
described in Sections numbered 12 in the firsgt digit are hereby
defined and established as loading zones and shall be governed by
the provisions of Section 12.1 (A) 3 of Ordinance No. N.S. 238.
(The numbers to the right of the decimal in the section numbers
below serve to identify the street as such street is shown on the
master list of streets on file in the Office of the City
Engineer.)
Eleventh Place, north side, between 188' and 198' west of Pacific
Coast Highway
Hermosa Avenue, west side, between 33' and 75' south of
Thirteenth Street
Myrtle Avenue, east side, between 58' and 145' north of
twenty-fifth street
Pier Avenue, north side, between 32' and53' west of Valley Drive
Pier Avenue, south side, between 95' and 114' west of Valley
Drive
Twenty -Fifth Street, north side, between 151' and 218' east of
Myrtle Avenue
1
CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH
GALIIF®INEA
WHJrg ZONES
SCALE: I INCH•400 FEET
ale..
•
ojailf
VIP
Js
7
Mini,
ft14,4
as
7/
rp=
J
•
:Iii ! ii/ iii 3 I� ri 1 r ,
1,,_,�...0�',��1 Dim -f0 , ,� iC L 1 '�;!
._E=1. Com.
4 •
March 6, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council March 14, 1989
AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE WIDENING, CIP 85-102
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council:
1. Authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with Excel Paving
Company at a cost not to exceed $134,593.
2. Appropriate $44,597 to CIP 85-102, from the Grant Fund
(Federal Aid Urban).
3. Transfer $6,336 from CIP 88-160 to CIP 85-102 in the State
Gas Tax Fund.
4. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary.
Background:
On January 24, 1989, City Council authorized staff to advertise
for construction bids on this project.
This project will widen Highland Avenue from 30 feet to 40 feet
from 35th Street to Longfellow Avenue. New pavement, curb and
gutter, sidewalk, handicapped ramps, street lights, and sanitary
sewer will be installed.
Analysis:
The analysis is divided into the following sections:
1. The Bids
2. Contract Administration & Inspection
3. Recommendation of Award
4. Fiscal Impact
1. The Bids
Five sealed bids were received by the City Clerk on February 23,
1989. The bids were publicly opened and read aloud. The bid
results were as follows:
1. Excel Paving Company
2. Bruce Paving Company, Inc.
3. Sully - Miller Contracting
Company
4. Damon Construction Company
5. Shawnan Corporation
$122,357.58 (4.4%)*
140,343.50 (. 20%)
148,314.00
165,769.00
177,710.00
Engineer's Estimate: $117,187.00
* Percent difference from the Engineer's Estimate.
All bids are available for review at the office of the City
Clerk.
2. Contract Administration & Inspection
The County of Los Angeles will be providing contract
administration, material testing and inspection services on this'
project. Since this is a Federal -Aid -Urban project, the
Department of Transportation (Caltrans) will be overseeing the
project.
3. Recommendation of Award
The County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works has
reviewed the bids and recommends awarding a contract to the low
bidder, Excel Paving Company. Excel Paving is well known as a
responsible contractor by the County and neighboring cities in
the South Bay area. The firm holds a current General Engineering
license with the State of California (#454186A). The license is
a good standing and no violations have been filed against the
firm.
Staff contacted three references who confirmed that Excel Paving
is qualified to successfully execute the project, finish within
budget and within the schedule. Staff concurs with Los Angeles
County and has received approval from Caltrans to award the
contract to Excel Paving.
Contractor Amount Not to
Contractor Bid
10% Contingency
Not to Exceed Amount
Fiscal Impact:
Exceed
$122,357.58
12,235.42
$134,593.00
Design
Construction
Inspection
Subtotal
Contingency
Total
FY 88-89
Existing
Spent to Appropria-
Date* tion
$10,148 • $ -0-
- 0- 97,000
- 0- 11,000
10,148 $108,000
-0- 10,800
$10,148 $118,800
* $7,601 were spent in FY 87-88
Funding Sources (FY 88-89)
Street Lighting Fund
State
Grant
Sewer
Total
Gas Tax Fund
Fund (FAU)
Fund
Current
Funding
$ 26,000
17,800
64,000
11,000
$118,800
* This project is eligible for 86.44%
for construction and inspection.
Estimated Fund Balances
Estimated
Fund
Balance
as of
6/30/89
Street Lighting Fund $1,229,060
State Gas Tax Fund -0-
Grant Fund (FAU) 81,838
Sewer Fund 161
Total Anti-
cipated
Expenditures
$ 10,688
122,358
16,000
$149,046
14,905
$163,951
Required
Funding
$ 6,152
24,136
119,597*
6,465
$156,350
Federal Aid
Additional
Funds
Required
$ 3,087
25,358
5,000
$33,445
4,105
$37,550
Additional
Appropriation
Required
Additional
Appropriation
Required
-0-
-0-
55,597
-0-
-0-
6,336
55,597
-0-
61,933
Urban Funding
Revised
Estimated
Fund Balance
6/30/89
$1,229,060
-0-
26,241
161
Alternatives:
Alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council
are:
1. Reject the low bidder.
2. Rebid the project.
3. Drop the project.
Respectfully submitted,
Brian Gengler
Assistant Engineer
Concur:
Devin B. Northcraft
City Manager
Attachment: Project Schedule
ty/hawac
Concur:
• Anthony Antich
Director of Public Works
4
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copland
Finance Administrator
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
PROJECT NAME : Highland Avenue Widening, CIP 85-102
ACCOUNT NUMBER :
150-401-8102-4201
LEGEND
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : immumummosism
ACTUAL SCHEDULE
X : 100% COMPLETE
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
TASKS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG. SEP OCT NOV DEC
1 1 1 1------1 . 1 1 1 1 I
Final design approval before advertising 11
for construction 1 11I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I
Prepare advertisement & set bid opening 1111111111
date
Advertising period I I���������, I 1 I I I I
(issue addendums as necessary)
Accept sealed bids & public bid opening
1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1
0
1 1 .1 I 1 1 1 1
Review bids um
I 1 1as 1 1 1 1 1
Award contract
1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Sign contract 111
(bonds,insurance & workers comp. cert.)
1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1---A--1
Preconstruction meeting procedure 11
1 1 1 I I I 1 I
Issue "Notice to Proceed" 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Construction Period 1111111111111111111
Monitor progress & maintain records sin lusilimetainal
1 1 1 1 1 1 1" .1
Progress payment and 1111111111111111111
change order procedure
1 1 1 1 1 1
Acceptance of work as complete
•Issusing and recording a I 1 1 1 1 IIr I
"Notice of Completion"
Retention Payment 1 I 1 1 I 1 Is 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Project close out 111111111111lPIIIII.
March 6, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council March 14, 1989
CIP 86-176
REJECTION OF BIDS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRE-EMPTION
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council
1. Reject the bids received.
2. Authorize staff to readvertise for new bids and issue addenda
as necessary.
Background:
On January 24, 1989 City Council authorized staff to advertise
for construction bids for this project. The project was
advertised and on February 23, 1989 two bids were received,
publicly opened and read aloud by the City Clerk.
Analysis:
The plans & specifications were received by four contractors.
Bids were received from the following contractor's:
1. Paul Gardner Corporation
2. Signal Maintenance, Inc.
$70,977
$78,411
The engineer's estimate of the work was $37,100. Staff recommends
readvertising this project since the bids were so high and only
two were received.
Alternatives:
Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City
Council are:
1. Revise the scope of work.
Respectfully submitted,
Concur:
AWAVI
Brian GenglAn 4
ony Antic
Director of •lic Works
Assistant Engineer
it j' Mana
Kevin B. Northcraft
lq
March 6, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council March 14, 1989
CIP88-604
REJECTION OF BID FOR INSTALLATION OF COMMUNITY CENTER
FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council
1. Reject the bid received.
2. Authorize staff to readvertise for new bids and issue addenda
as necessary.
Background:
On February 14, 1989 City Council authorized staff to advertise
for construction bids for this project as the existing system is
inadequate. The project was advertised. On March 2, 1989 only
one bid was received, publicly opened and read aloud by the City
Clerk.
Analysis:
The plans & specifications were received by three contractors.
Only one bid was received from Fire Call in the amount of
$42,381. The architect's estimate of the work was $25,000. A
call to the other two plan holders indicates that they were busy
at the time;
however, they are still interested in submitting a bid.
Alternatives:
Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City
Council are:
1. Revise the scope of work.
Respectfully submitted,
_AALISLANIAds Ain
•
Ant ony Antich 'Kevin' B. Nort craft
Director of • •lic Works City Manager
Concur:
cc: Steve Wisniewski, Public Safety Director
Alana Mastrian-Handman, Community Resources Director
March 8, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the City Council of March 14, 1989
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS
FEBRUARY 1988
Attached are the January Revenue and Expenditure Summaries. The
midyear revisions approved at the February 28, 1989 meeting will
be reflected in next month's reports.
Concur:
Attachments
VC/sl
Viki Copeland
Finance Administrator
ld
p
i
r"
TIME 12: 57: 57
FINANCE -.FA484
- CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 PAGE 0001
DATE 02/15/89
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION UNREAL I EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCEZED 6
001 GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3101 /CURRENT YEAR SECURED 2, 151. 336. 00 212, 573. 15 1, 223, 730. 07 927, 605. 93 56. 8
3102
3103 /CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED 167, 136. 00 8, 465. 14- 156, 426. 20 10, 709. 80 93. 5 3106 /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 150, 000. 00 44, 596. 48 145, 961. 12 4. 038. 88 97. 3 3107 /SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL 88813 60. 000. 00 15, 371. 96 52, 675. 42 7. 324. 58 87. 7 3108 /TRANSFER TAX 122, 940. 00 9, 424. 05 75, 870. 07 47, 069. 93 61. 7 3110 /SALES TAX 1. 735, 323. 00 111, 679. 48 957, 016. 47 778, 306. 53 55. 1 3111 /CABLE TV FRANCHISE 88, 000. 00 0. 00 49, 362. 00 38, 638. 00 56. 0 3112 /ELECTRIC FRANCHISE 34, 580. 00 0. 00 0. 00 34,580. 00 0. 0 3113 /GAS FRANCHISE 34, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 34.000. 00 0. 0 3114 /REFUSE FRANCHISE 102. 000. 00 7. 582. 10 64, 129. 50 37. 870. 50 62. 8 3115 /TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY 138, 185. 00. 0. 00 95.378. 04 42.806. 96 69. 0 3120 /BUSINESS LICENSE 500. 000. 00 36. 152. 44 248, 305. 30 251. 694. 70 49. 6
/UTILITY USER TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL0.00 O.O
5, 283. 500. 00 428. 914. 52 3, 068, 854. 19 2. 214,645. 81 58. 0
3200 LICENSES AND PERMITS --- -
3202
3203 /DOG LICENSES 14, 000. 00 766. 00 12, 267. 75 1. 732. 25 87. 6 3204 /BICYCLE LICENSES 200.00 9.00 •21.00 179.00 10.5 3205 /BUILDING PERMITS 160, 000. 00 13, 782. 74 112, 137. 61 47, 862. 39 70. 0
/ELECTRIC PERMITS
3206 38, 000. 00' 2. 703. 00 23, 430. 00 14, 570. 00 61. 6
3207
/PLUMBING PERMITS 30, 000. 00 3, 372. 00 16, 689. 00 13, 311. 00 55. 6 3209 /OCCUPANCY PERMITS 6, 000. 00 335. 00 2. 960. 00 3.040. 00 49. 3 3210 /GARAGE SALES 65.00 3.00 36.00 29.00 55.3
/BINGO PERMITS 200.00 0.00
44:79
3211 /BANNER PERMIT8 44.70 44.4
3212 1. 000. 00 100.00 1.444.79 4 444.79- 144.4
3213
/ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS 150.00 0.00 100.00 50.00 66.6 3214 /ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE 3, 500. 00 285. 00 2, 245. 00 1. 255. 00 64. 1
/AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT ' ' 0.00 0.00 80 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 253, 115. 00 21, 355. 74 171, 461. 15 81, 653. 85 67. 7
3300 FINES & FORFEITURES - - - - -.- -- --_
3301
3303 /VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS 100, 000. 00 6, 155. 06 70. 139. 11 29. 860. 89 70. 1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /COURT FINES/POLICE DEPT 35, 000. 00 2, 811. 36 25, 369. 88 • 9, 630. 12 72. 4
.135, 000. 00 8, 966. 42 951508. 99 39, 491. 01 70. 7
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 , /INTEREST INCOME 104,000.00
3402 ' /RENTS & CONCESSIONS 6.900.00
3403 /PIER REVENUE 9,960.00
3404 /COMM CTR LEASES 68.000.00
3405 /COMM CTR RENTALS 50.'000.00 .
3406 /COMM CTR THEATRE 14,000. 00
29,823. 50
54. 51
465. 60
10. 209. 00
5. 569. 50
931. 00
78, 058. 07
945. 61
7.331. 80
45, 078. 50
30, 322. 94
7. 958. 63
25, 941. 93
5. 954. 39
2. 628. 20
22, 921.50
19, 677. 06 •
6, 041. 37
75. 0
13. 7
73. 6
66. 2
60. 6
56. 8
411
r
1
•
•
•
A I
r
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 12:57:57
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
001 GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3411 /OTHER FACILITIES
3412 /TENNIS COURTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0002
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
• 58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
50. 000. 00 3,761.50 34.830. 75 - 15. 169. 25 ' 69. 6
12. 500. 00 902. 50 6,227.45 6.272.55 49. 8
315. 360.00 51, 717.11 210, 753.75 104, 606.25 66.8
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE
3504 /IN LIEU OFF HIGHWAY 350.00 110.70 336.37 13.63 96.1
3505 /IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE 636. 204.00 54, 650.81 405, 016.06 231, 187.94 63.6
3507 /HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE 6,929.00 0. 00 759. 53 6.169.47 10. 9
3509 /HOMEOWNER PROP TX RELIE 64, 000. 00 22.938. 24 32, 742. 11 31.257. 89 51. 1
3510 /POST 17, 500.00 1,719.14 11, 184.56 6,315.44 63.9
3511 /STC -SVC OFF TRAINING 9,000.00 445.38 1,945.38 7.054.62 21.6
3514 /CIGARETTE TAX 52, 000.00 9,208.89 28, 595.28 23.404.72 54.9
3515 /SUPPLEMENTAL SUBVENTION 12, 627. 00 0. 00 12.627. 13 0. 13- 100. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 798, 610. 00 89, 073. 16 493. 206. 42 305. 403. 58 61. 7
3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY
3603 /RECYCLING FEASIBILITY 0.00 0.00 5.000.00 _ 5,000.00- 0.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 5,000.00 5,000.00- 0. 0
3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES ..
3801 /RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION 12.500.00 1,560.00 10, 440.00 2,060.00 83.5
3802 /SIGN REVIEW 700.00 25.00 555.00 145.00 79.2
3803 /ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 4.830.00 230.00 5,150.00 320.00- 106.6
3806 /BOARD OF APPEALS 675.00 0.00 75.00 600.00 11.1
3808 /ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW 2,880.00 0.00 1,920.00 960.00 66.6
3809 /TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW .3.600.00 675.00 3,607.20 7.20- 100.2
3810 /FINAL MAP REVIEW 1.250.00 125.00 1,125.00 125.00 90.0
3811 /ZONE CHANGE REVIEW 1.800.00 450.00 1,800.00 0.00 100.0
3812 /CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 11, 520.00 2,005.00 18, 140.00 6.620.00- 157.4
3813 /PLAN CHECK FEES 105, 000. 00 12, 199. 43 84.910. 37 20, 089. 63 80. 8
3814 /PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL 1.066.00 0.00 1,599.00. 533.00- 150.0
3815 /PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES 12.000.00 367.63 3.276.33 8.723.67 27.3
3816 /CURB/SIDEWALK REPAIR 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.0
3817 /SPECIAL CURB MARKING 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.0
3818 /POLICE SERVICES 15,000.00 1.634.50 8,622.50 6.377.50 57.4
3819 /JAIL SERVICES 28, 000.00 1,190.00 5,525.00 22, 475.00 19.7
3820 /TRUSTY ADMIN FEE 1.500.00 170.00 2,305.00 805.00- 153.6
3821 /FINGERPRINT SERVICE 3.000.00 82.50 1,197.50 1,802.50 39.9
3823 /SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY 20.000. 00 0. 00 8,745.00 11, 255. 00 43. 7
3824 /VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES 3,000.00 156.00 930.00 2,070.00 31.0
3825 /PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING 40.00 10.00 70.00 30.00- 175.0 --s
3827 /LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT 6,060.00 0.00 6,060.00 0.00 100.0
•
r
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
•, FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0003
TIME 12:57:57 FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
r,,, FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
r
r
r
001 GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES
X
3831 /STREET CUT INSPECTION 19, 200. 00 175. 00 8, 065. 00 11, 135. 00 42. 0
3834 /ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 1, 188. 00 2. 618. 50 5, 349. 50 4. 161. 50- 450. 2
3836 /FUMIGATION INSPECT FEE 7, 500. 00 . 744. 30 4, 851. 50 2, 648. 50 64. 6
3837 /RETURNED CHECK CHARGE 800. 00 0.60 295. 40 - 504.60 36.9
3838 /SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIO 400. 00 166. 80 1, 202. 20 802. 20- 300. 5
3839 /PHOTOCOPY CHARGES 600. 00 43. 29 387. 39 212. 61 • 64. 5
3840 /AMBULANCE TRANSPORT 8. 000. 00 1. 070. 00 5, 650. 25 2. 349. 75 70. 6
3841 /POLICE TOWING 30, 000. 00 1. 680. 00 15, 942. 50 14, 057. 50 53. 1
3856 /GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 450. 00 450. 00 1, 350. 00 900. 00- 300. 0
3857 /PKG PLAN APPLICATION 640.00 0.00 640.00 0.00 100.0
3858 /TENANT REFUSE BILLING 400.00 20.00 120.00 280.00 30.0
3859 /REFUSE LIEN FEE 500.00 1.489. 57- 540.00 40.00- 108.0
3860 /BOOTING RELEASE FEE 10, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 0W 10, 000. 00 O. 0
3861 /HAZARDOUS MAT PERMIT 2.500.00 0.00 0.00 2.500.00 0.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 316, 999. 00 26, 358. 98 210, 446. 64 106, 552. 36 66. 3
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3901 /SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 8, 000. 00 872. 00- 396. 814. 07 388, 814. 07- 4960. 1
3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 3. 000. 00 71. 50- 42, 819. 94 39, 819. 94- 1427. 3
3903 /CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT 3, 000. 00. 500. 00 500. 00 2, 500. 00 16. 6
3904 /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 1, 000. 00 49. 80- 1, 427. 64 427. 64- 142. 7
3907 /FOUNDATION CONTRIBUTION 25, 000. 00 O. 00 25, 000. 00 O. 00 100. 0
3913 /CITY OFFICES RECYCLING 0.00 11.38 2.726. 17 2.726. 17- O.0
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 1, 742, 924. 00 144, 413. 00 1, 020. 874. 00 722. 050. 00 58. 5
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 782. 924. 00 143. 931. 08 1. 490. 161. 82 292. 762. 1 8 83. 5
(-
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 8, 885. 508. 00 770, 317. 01 5. 745, 392. 96 3. 140. 115. 04 64. 6
r
FUND TOTAL
r
r
r.
8. 885, 508. 00 770, 317. 01 5, 745, 392. 96
3. 140. 115. 04 64. 6
r
•
•. FINANCE-FA484
TIME 12:57:57
r
r
•
•
s
r
r
r
•
•
r
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3101
3103
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
/CURRENT -YEAR SECURED
/PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3955
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DEPT 0000
FUND TOTAL
/INTEREST INCOME
/OPERATING TRANSFERS IN
TOTALS
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
EST ,REV
357. 882. 00
27, 000. 00
384. 882. 00
80. 000. 00
80, 000. 00
3. 309. 00
3, 309. 00
468. 191. 00
468. 191. 00
•
MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE
32. 827. 51
0. 00
32, 827. 51
185. 110. 63
9. 470. 34
194. 580. 97
10. 962. 62 44, 127. 91
10, 962. 62 44. 127. 91
0. 00 3. 309. 00
0. 00 3, 309. 00
43, 790. 13 242. 017. 88
43.790.13 242,017.88
PAGE 0004
DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
BALANCE Y.
172. 771. 37
17. 529. 66
190. 301. 03
35. 872. 09
35. 872. 09
51. 7
35. 0
50. 5
55. 1
55. 1
0. 00 100. 0
0. 00 100. 0
226. 173. 12 51. 6
226. 173. 12 51. 6
•
•
`• FINANCE-FA484
TIME 12:57:57
r..
r
•
•
A
r
•
•
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
110 PARKING FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
3300 FINES & FORFEITURES
3302 /COURT FINES/PARKING
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401
3407
3409
3413
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
3800 CURRENT
3842
3843
3844
3845
3846
3847
3848
3849
3850
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
/INTEREST INCOME
/PARKING LOT RENTAL
/LOT B
/VPD LEASE
SERVICE CHARGES
/PARKING METERS
/PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL
/DAILY PARKING PERMITS
/VPD LOT PERMITS/DAILY
/VPD LOT PERMITS/MONTHLY
/VALIDATION STAMPS
/DRIVEWAY PERMITS
/GUEST PERMITS
/CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3902
3904
3955
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DEPT 0000
FUND TOTAL
/REFUNDS/REIMS PREV YR
/GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS
/BUDGETED TRANSFERS IN
TOTALS
EST REV
1. 375. 000. 00
1. 375. 000. 00
52, 000. 00
30, 000. 00
22. 000. 00
65, 000. 00
169, 000. 00
580, 000. 00
185, 000. 00
2, 500.00
3, 500. 00
7, 000. 00
5. 000. 00
500. 00
1. 000. 00
1, 000. 00
785, 500. 00
0. 00
0. 00
12, 249. 00
12, 249. 00
2, 341, 749. 00
MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE
105. 370. 00
105, 370. 00
1, 241. 11
2, 192. 25
1. 915. 84
1. 000. 00
6. 349. 20
• 45, 618. 05
718. 50
0.00
102. 24
662. 40
0. 00
110. 00
54. 00
60. 00
47. 325. 19
PAGE 0005
DATE 02/15/89
58. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
BALANCE 7.
796, 013. 24 578, 986. 76
796. 013. 24 578. 986. 76
57. 8
57. 8
16, 293. 15 35, 706. 85 31. 3
15, 345. 75 14, 654. 25 51. 1
11, 495. 04 10, 504. 96 52. 2
47, 024. 48 17, 975. 52 72. 3
90, 158. 42 78, 841. 58 53. 3
369, 088. 00 210, 912. 00 63. 6
15:944. 50 169, 055. 50 8. 6
995. 00 1, 505. 00 39. 8
4, 120. 61 620. 61- 117. 7
5, 790. 60 1. 209. 40 82. 7
11, 389. 39 6. 389. 39- 227. 7
308. 50 191. 50 61. 7
568.00 432.00 56.8
1, 600. 00 600. 00- 160. 0
409, 804. 60 375, 695. 40 52. 1
253.60 39.34 39.34- 0.0
0.00 41.00 41.00- 0.0
0. 00 12, 249. 06 0. 00 100. 0
253.60 12.329.34 80.34- 100.6
159. 297. 99
2. 341, 749. 00 159. 297. 99
1, 308, 305. 60 1. 033, 443. 40 55. 8
1..308, 305. 60 1. 033. 443. 40 55. 8
•
• CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
f FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0006
TIME 12:57:57 FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
r UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST.REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
115 STATE GAS TAX FUND
r
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 44, 000. 00 2, 982. 23
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 44, 000. 00 2, 982. 23
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE
3501 /SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION 83. 593. 00 7, 433. 73
3502 /SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 174, 848. 00 15. 713. 16
3503 /SECT 2107.5 ALLOCATION 4, 000. 00 O. 00
• 3522 /TDA ARTICLE 3 (68821) 5, 196. 00 O. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 267. 637. 00 23, 146. 89
• 3900 OTHER REVENUE
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 110, 129. 00 6, 620. 00
. OBJECT SUBTOTAL 110, 129. 00 6.620. 00
• DEPT 0000 TOTALS 421, 766. 00 32. 749. 12
FUND TOTAL 421.766.00 • 32.749. 12
•
•
r
'13. 418. 87
13.418. 87
44, 845. 88
92, 423. 78
4, 000. 00
'O. 00
141.269. 66
77, 024. 00
77, 024. 00
231, 712. 53
231, 712. 53
30. 581. 13
30. 581. 13
38, 747. 12 •
82. 424. 22
0. 00
5.196.00
126. 367. 34
33. 105. 00
33. 105. 00
190, 053. 47
30. 4
30. 4
53. 6
52. 8
100. 0
0. 0
52. 7
69. 9
69. 9
54. 9
190,053.47 54.9
A
•
CITY'OF HERMOSA BEACH
f FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0007
TIME 12:57:57 FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
•
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCEUNREAL I
ZED /
r 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
r
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 4,000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4.000. 00
3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY
3601 /COUNTY AID TO CITIES 15, 000. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 15.000.00
r DEPT 0000 TOTALS 19, 000.00
•
r
C
•
FUND TOTAL 19, 000. 00
303. 00
303. 00
0. 00
0. 00
303. 00
303. 00
1, 275. 44
1, 275. 44
0. 00
0. 00
1, 275. 44
1, 275. 44
2. 724. 56 31. 8
2, 724. 56 . 31.
15, 000. 00 0. 0
15, 000. 00 0. 0
17, 724. 56 6. 7
17,724.56 6.7
e•
r..
r
r
•
•
f
r
r
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0008
TIME 12:57:57 FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3116 /PARK REC FACILITY TAX 70,000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 70.000. 00
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 24, 000. 00
3416 /OIL ROYALTIES 4. 807. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 28, 807. 00
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3910 /PARK/RECREATION IN LIEU 175,000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 175,000.00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 273.807.00
FUND TOTAL 273. 807. 00
•
9. 801. 00
9, 801. 00
.37, 102. 00
37. 102. 00
4. 832. 69 18, 124. 36
0. 00 0. 00
4. 832. 69 18, 124. 36
6, 534. 00 98, 010. 00
6, 534. 00 98, 010. 00
21, 167. 69 153, 236. 36
•
21. 167. 69 153. 236. 36
32, 898. 00 53. 0
32, 898. 00 53. 0
5, 875. 64 , 75. 5
4. 807. 00 0. 0
10, 682. 64 62. 9
76, 990. 00 56. 0
76.990.00 56.0
120.570.64 55.9
120.570.64 55.9
A
r
•
•'
V
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0009
TIME 12:57:57 FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
r. 126 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND
r
•
•
r
r -
r,
•
•
•'
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3120 /UTILITY USER TAX 777,627.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 777.627.00
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 42,000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 42, 000. 00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 819.627.00
FUND TOTAL 819, 627.00
•
58. 694. 48 441. 261. 83
58. 694. 48 441. 261. 83
4.724.68 14. 122. 20
4,724.68 14, 122. 20
63, 419. 16 455, 384. 03
63, 419. 16 455. 384. 03
336, 365.17. 56.7
336.365.17 56.7
27.877.80 33.6
27.877. 80 33.6
364.242.97 55.5
364, 242.97 55.5
•
r
r
r•
•
e
1
r
w
•
1
CITY•OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0010
TIME 12:57:57 FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
127 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3120 /UTILITY USER TAX 1.166, 440.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1. 166, 440. 00
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 56.000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 56.000.00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1, 222. 440. 00
FUND TOTAL 1.222.440.00
88.041.72 661.884.41
88. 041. 72 661, 884. 41
466.38 1,614.12
466.38 1,614.12
88. 508. 10 663, 498. 53
89. 508. 10 663, 498. 53
504. 555. 59
504, 555. 59 .
56. 7
56. 7
54.385. 88 2. 8
54, 385. 88 2. 8
558,941.47 54.2
558.941.47 54.2
r
•
•
t
r
r
r
•
•
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 12:57:57
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
130 REVENUE SHARING FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME
OBJECT SUBTOTAL '
DEPT 0000 TOTALS
FUND TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
EST REV
8.000. 00
8,000.00
8,000.00
8, 000. 00
MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE
91. 83
91. 83
91. 83
91. 83
670. 21
670. 21
670. 21
670. 21
PAGE 0011
DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
BALANCE
7.329. 79
7.329.79
7.329. 79
8.3
8.3
8.3
7. 329. 79 8. 3
•
•
r
r
•
•
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 12:57:57
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3117 /PROPOSITION A TRANSIT
3121 SUBREQNL INCENTIVE FUNDS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
•
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0012
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 . DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
189, 587. 00
36. 422. 00
226, 009. 00
21, 660. 00
0. 00
21. 660. 00
105, 105. 00
0. 00
105, 105. 00
84.482.00 55.4
36, 422. 00 0. 0
120,904.00 46.5
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 12, 000. 00 2, 199. 66 8, 754. 63 3. 245. 37 72. 9
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 12, 000. 00 2, 199. 66 • 8, 754. 63 3. 245. 37 72. 9
3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES
3852 /FARES, ESEA 1, 810. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 810. 00 0. 0
3854 /FARES. DIAL A RIDE 8.050.00 0.00 0.00 8.050.00 0.0
3855 /BUS PASSES 3, 500. 00 • 607. 00 3, 349. 00 151. 00 95. 6
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 13,360. 00 607. 00 3.349. 00 10, 011. 00 25. 0
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 1, 106. 00 0. 00 1, 106. 00 0. 00 100. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 106. 00 0. 00 1, 106. 00 • 0. 00 100. 0
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 252, 475. 00 24, 466. 66 118. 314. 63 • 134, 160. 37 46. 8
FUND TOTAL 252.475.00
24, 466. 66 118. 314. 63
134, 160. 37 46. 8
c
••
•.
/^
r
r
•
•
•
r
r.
r
r
r
•
•
A
r
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 12:57:57
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
150 GRANT FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0013
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE %
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 0.00 614.72
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 614.72
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE
3526 /19-378 CLARK STADIUM 0.00 0.00
3527 /19-857 COMMUNITY CENTER 0.00 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00
3700 INTERGOVERNMENT/FEDERAL
3701 /FEDERAL AID URBAN 433, 200. 00 0. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 433.200.00 0.00
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 81,600.00 4.632.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 81, 600. 00 4, 632. 00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 514, 800. 00 5, 246. 72
FUND TOTAL 514, 800. 00 5, 246. 72
1, 361. 95
. 1. 361. 95
1, 932. 30
910. 00
2, 842. 30
1. 361. 95- 0. 0
1. 361. 95- O. 0
1, 932. 30- 0. 0
910. 00- • 0. 0
2. 842. 30- 0. 0
0.00 433.200.00 0.0
0.00 433.200.00 0.0
43, 262. 00
43, 262. 00
47, 466. 25
47, 466. 25
38.338.00 53.0
38, 338. 00 53. 0
467.333.75 9.2
467.333.75 9.2
1•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
f+ FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0014
TIME 12:57:57 FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
eK
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
e- 155 CROSSING GUARD FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
r
•
•
r
e
•
•
r
r
6
3100 TAXES
3101 /CURRENT YEAR SECURED 73. 495.00 6,g52.36
3103 /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 5.196.00 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 78. 691, 00 6,552.36
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 0.00 229.65
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 229.65
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 452.00 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 452.00 0.00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 79. 143.00 6.782.01
FUND TOTAL 79.143.00 6.782.01
37.418. 45
1.094.27
38. 512. 72
591. 95
591, 95
452. 00
452. 00
39, 556. 67 •
39, 556. 67
36.076.55 50.9
4. 101. 73 21. 0
40. 178. 28 48. 9
591. 95-• 0. 0
591. 95- 0. 0
0. 00 100. 0
0. 00 100. 0
39.586.33 49.9
39.586.33 49.9
0.4
•
•
r
•
•
•
r
r
•
•
1
••
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0015
TIME 12:57:57 FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/09
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7.
160 SEWER FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 48, 000. 00 0. 00 32, 089. 31 15. 910. 69 • 66. 8
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 48, 000. 00 0. 00 32. 089. 31 15. 910. 69 66. 8
3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY
3602 /BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANC 5, 000. 00 0. 00 931. 77 4. 068. 23 18. 6
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 000. 00 0. 00 931. 77 4. 068. 23 18. 6
3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES
3828 /SEWER CONNECTION FEE 30, 000. 00 964. 55 11, 207. 62 18. 792. 38 37. 3
3829 /SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 1,200.00 105. 00 700. 00 500. 00 58. 3
3832 /SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN 6,000.00 75. 00 1,334.51 4.665. 49 22. 2
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 37, 200. 00 1, 144. 55 13, 242. 13 23. 957. 87 35. 5
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3906 /IN LIEU SEWER FEE 25, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 25. 000. 00 0. 0
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 803, 481. 00 77, 806. 45 481, 287. 45 322. 193. 55 59. 9
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 828, 481. 00 77, 806. 45 481. 287. 45 347. 193. 55 58. 0
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 918. 681. 00 78. 951. 00 527, 550. 66 391. 130. 34 57. 4
FUND TOTAL
918,681.00 78.951.00 527,550.66 391.130.34
57. 4
. 3
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 12:37:37 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0016
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 . DATE 02/15/89
58. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUNDOBJ DESCRIPTION UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
r
r
170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3300 FINES & FORFEITURES
3304 /FORFEITED FUNDS 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00- 0.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00- 0.0
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 16, 000. 00 3. 185. 32 11, 480. 90 4. 519. 10 71. 7
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 16. 000. 00 3, 185. 32 11, 480. 90 4. 519. 10 71. 7
• DEPT 0000 TOTALS 16. 000. 00 3, 185. 32 11.482. YO 4. 517. 10 71. 7
•
•
r
r
r
r
•
•
A
FUND TOTAL 16, 000. 00 3, 185. 32 11. 482. 90 4. 517. 10 71. 7
• • •
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
ir FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT !BY FUND) PAGE 0017
TIME 12:57:57 FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
e. UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
r. 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND M
DEPARTMENT 0000
r ^
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 0. 00 1.190.06 3,315.02 3.315.02-, 0.0
r OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 1, 190.06 3.315.02 3.315.02- 0.0 .
3900 OTHER REVENUE
r 3912 /FIRE FLOW FEE 50,000.00 9,108.50 80, 316.09 30,316.09- 160.6
3955 /OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 59, 700.00 4,165.00 38,865.00 20, 835.00 65.1
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 109, 700.00 13, 273.50 119, 181.09 9,481.09- 108.6
40 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 109, 700.00 14, 463.56 122, 496.11 12,796.11- 111.6
•
r
r '
r•
r
•
c
r
r
FUND TOTAL 109, 700.00 • 14, 463.56 122. 496.11 12,796.11- 111.6
•
t' FINANCE-FA484
TIME 12:57:57
r
•
•
0
i
•
•
r
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
705 INSURANCE FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0018
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 24,000.00 6,761.69 28, 738.64 4,738.64- 119.7
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 24, 000. 00 6,761.69 28, 738. 64 4,738.64- 119. 7
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 195. 597.00 16, 158.00 114, 811.00 80.786.00 58.6
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 195, 597.00 16, 158.00 114, 811.00 80, 786. 00 58.6
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 219. 597.00 22,919.69 143, 549.64 76, 047.36 65.3
FUND TOTAL
REPORT TOTALS
219. 597. 00 22. 919. 69 143, 549. 64 76. 047. 36 65. 3
16, 570. 484. 00 1. 335. 658. 99 9, 811, 910. 40 6. 758, 573. 60 59. 2
.04
r
1'
r
t
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:53:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
0000
1401 GASOLINE INVENTORY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
1101 CITY COUNCIL
DEPT:
DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4319 SPECIAL EVENTS --
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL -
1121 CITY CLERK DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES,
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
LEGISLATIVE
20. 731. 00
518. 00
818. 00
17. 700. 00
39. 767. 00
22, 500. 00
22, 500. 00
600. 00
9, 500. 00
4, 559. 00
5, 000.00
1. 000. 00
1. 590. 00-
19, 069. 00
2. 500. 00
- 2, 500.00
- 83.836. 00
LEGISLATIVE
29, 388. 00
0. 00
735. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
1. 482. 00
0. 00
O. 00 .
1, 200. 00
2.682. 00
0.00
0.00
45. 27
805. 82
0.00
57. 20
23. 94
0.00
932. 23
0.00
0.00
3.614. 23
2, 009. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.120.43
0. 00
421. 82
8, 401. 00
21, 943. 25
12, 755. 46
12. 755. 46
75. 45
5, 149. 76
2. 477. 00
1. 278. 79
271.70
0.00
9, 252. 70
2, 500. 00
2. 500. 00
46, 451. 41
15, 127.46
59. 22
906. 63
•
PAGE 0001
DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0: 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 •
0.00
0. 00
55. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
55. 00
0. 00
0.00
55. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 0
0. 00 • 0. 0
0. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 0
8. 610. 57
518. 00
603. 82-
9. 299. 00
17. 823. 75
9. 744. 54
9. 744. 54
524. 55
4. 295. 24
2. 082. 00
3. 721. 21
728. 30
1, 590. 00-
9. 761. 30
58. 4
0.0
173. 8
47.4
55. 1
56. 6
56,6
12. 5
54. 7
54. 3
25. 5
27. 1
0. 0
48. 8
0. 00 100. 0
0. 00 100. 0
37.329.59 55.4
14. 260. 54
59. 22-
171. 63-
51. 4
0. 0
123. 3
it CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0002
f ' TIME 11:55:59 FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD.EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
001 GENERAL FUND
i• 1121 CITY CLERK DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
'+ 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES f
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 735.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 735.00 0.0
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY • - - - 12, 000. 00 1, 000. 00 9, 000. 00 0. 00 3.000. 00 • 75. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 42. 858. 00 3. 009. 00 25, 093. 31 0. 00 17, 764. 69 58. 5 ..
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
r 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 300.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 200.00 33.3 .
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 300.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 200.00 33. 3
40 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE 440. 00 120. 74 272. 21 0. 00 167. 79 61. 8
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 2. 000. 00 319. 29 1, 241. 69 20. 07 738. 24 63. 0
• 4315 MEMBERSHIP 220. 00 35. 00 175.00 0.00 45.00 79.5
4316 TRAINING 400.00 0.00 425.00 0.00 25.00- 106.2
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 550. 00 0. 00 • 115. 00 0. 00 435. 00 20. 9
• 4323 PUBLIC NOTICING 8, 000. 00 1, 271. 20 4. 278. 25 0. 00 3, 721. 75 53. 4
4397 2. 57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS 1.349.00- 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.349.00- 0.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 10, 261. 00 1, 746. 23 6, 507. 15 20. 07 3, 733. 78 63. 6
f"
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.0
r OBJECT SUBTOTAL 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.0
�-. DIVISION TOTAL 53. 619. 00 4. 755. 23 31, 700. 46 20. 07 21. 898. 47 59. 1
1122 ELECTIONS DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 2.000. 00 0. 00 81.68 0. 00 -- - - 1, 918. 32 -- -4. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 000. 00 Q. 00 81. 68 0. 00 1, 918. 32 4. 0
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES •- -- ---- - _ _____ - _-. -
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 10.900. 00 O. 00 913. 53 O. 00' 9, 986. 47 8. 3
OBJECT SUBTOTAL IO. 900. 00 O. 00 913. 53 0. 00 9, 986. 47 8. 3
. 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 O.0
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ---- - 500. 00 57. 94 478. 86 57. 35 36. 21- 107. 2
4316 TRAINING 400.00 0.00 • 287.00 0.00 113.00 71.7
s 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 200.00 O. 00 0.00 O. 00 200.00 O. 0
L - 4397 2. 5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS -- 353. 00- O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 353. 00- O. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 847.00 57.94 765.86 57.35 23.79 97. 1
L
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
DIVISION TOTAL
1131 CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
13, 747. 00
DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1132 CITY PROSECUTOR
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
138. 487. 00
3, 000. 00
141. 487. 00
2. 400. 00
1. 650. 00
3. 526. 00-
524. 00
142. 011. 00
DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
25. 440. 00
25, 440. 00
14, 000. 00
14. 000. 00
986. 00-
986. 00-
38. 454. 00
1141 CITY TREASURER DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
11, 331. 00
1, 000. 00
356. 00
356. 00
9, 000. 00
22, 043. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
57. 94
8. 022. 03
447. 36
8. 469. 39
459. 45
73. 08
0. 00
532. 53
9, 001.92
2. 120. 00
2. 120.00
'0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2, 120. 00
952. 50
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
750. 00
1, 702. 50
1, 761. 07
58, 959. 42
480. 86
59. 440. 28
1, 296. 83
706. 49
0. 00
2. 003. 32
61, 443. 60
14. 840. 00
14, 840. 00
1, 200. 00
1, 200. 00
0. 00
0. 00
16, 040. 00
6, 473. 50
118. 56
•
0. 00
0. 00
5, 250. 00
11. 842. 06
PAGE 0003
DATE 02/15/89
58. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X
57. 35
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
11, 928. 58 13. 2
79.527.58 42.5
2, 519. 14 16. 0
82, 046. 72 42. 0
1, 103. 17 54. 0
943. 51 42. 8
3, 526. 00- 0. 0
1. 479. 32- 382. 3
80. 567. 40 43. 2
0. 00 10, 600. 00 58. 3
0. 00 ' 10, 600. 00 58. 3
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00.
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
12, 800. 00 8. 5
12, 800. 00 8. 5
986. 00- 0. 0
986. 00- 0. 0
22, 414. 00 41. 7
4. 857. 50
881. 44
356. 00
356. 00
3. 750. 00
10. 200. 94
57. 1
11. 8
0. 0
0. 0
58. 3
53. 7
• CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
4111, FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (13Y FUND) PAGE 0004
C TIME 11:55:59 FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
r
r
•
•
r
r•
•
a
•
r'
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1141 CITY TREASURER
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
1201 CITY MANAGER
5, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
700. 00
1, 000. 00
110. 00
250. 00
500. 00
716. 00-
1, 844. 00
28, 887. 00
360, 554. 00
DEPT: MOMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
95. 525. 00
2. 350. 00
2, 350. 00
3, 640. 00
103, 865. 00
20, 300. 00
20, 300. 00
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE 1.000.00
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1, 500. 00
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 350.00
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 125.00
4315 MEMBERSHIP 1, 062. 00
4316 TRAINING 3, 322. 00
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE - - 2.900.00
4397 2. 5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS 3.001.00 -
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7, 258. 00
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
216. 47
216. 47
88. 51
234. 97
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
323. 48
1, 112. 90
1, 112. 90
310. 63
954. 18
40. 00
26. 63
0. 00
0. 00
1,331.44
2, 242. 45 • 14. 286. 40
21. 791. 77
7, 589. 00
0. 00
0. 00
259. 88
7, 848. 88
2, 003. 00
2, 003. 00
103. 95
98. 63
17. 66
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
382. 00
0. 00
602. 24
7, 621.00 • 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
171, 682. 94 132. 42
54, 937. 08
0. 00
18627. 02
2, 350. 41
58, 914. 51
8,301.95
8, 301. 95
295. 20
821. 33
111. 84
4. 00
1,011.87
122. 89
1, 775. 79
0. 00
4. 142. 92
7. 620. 66
O. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00.
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
3. 887. 10 22. 2
3, 887. 10 • 22. 2
389. 37 44. 3
45. 82 95. 4
70. 00 36. 3
223. 37 10. 6
500. 00 0. 0
716. 00- 0. 0
512. 56 72. 2
14, 600. 60 49. 4
188.738.64 47.6
40, 587. 92 57. 5
2, 350. 00 0. 0
722. 98 69. 2
1, 289. 59 64. 5
44.950.49 56.7
11, 998. 05 40. 8
11, 998. 05 40. 8
704. 80 29. 5
678. 67 54. 7
238. 16 31. 9
121. 00 3. 2
50. 13 95. 2
3, 199. 11 3. 6
1, 124. 21 61. 2
3. 001. 00- 0. 0
3, 115. 08 57. 0
0.00 0.34 99.9
1'
e -
r
•
•
1
r
r
•
•
A
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1202 FINANCE ADMIN
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
7, 621. 00
139, 044. 00
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN *500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
174, 062. 00
2, 124. 00
4. 045. 00
4, 045. 00
1, 000. 00
185, 276. 00
62, 730. 00
62. 730. 00
1. 034. 00
9. 938. 00
215. 00
2. 702. 00
1. 788. 00
5, 143. 00-
10, 534. 00
500. 00
1. 500. 00
2. 000. 00
260. 540. 00
1203 PERSONNEL DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 36,780.00
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 882.00
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN • 882.00
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 3, 640. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 42, 184. 00
MONTHLY EXP
0. 00
10, 454. 12
14, 999. 02
9. 54
0. 00
140. 80
0. 00
15, 199. 36
111. 51
111.51
403. 13
618. 08
0. 00
112. 56
0. 00
O. 00
1. 133. 77
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
16, 444. 64
YTD EXPND.
7, 620. 66
78, 980. 04
99, 281. 49
1, 864. 99
0. 00
4, 078. 15
0. 00
105, 224. 63
18, 036. 25
18, 036. 25
787. 39
5, 929. 19
140. 00
1, 009. 73
230. 00
0. 00
8, 096. 31
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
131, 357. 19
3, 605. 64 18, 779. 44
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 690. 12
259. 88 2, 350. 41
3, 865. 52 21. 819. 97
PAGE 0005
DATE 02/15/89
58.07. CIF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 34
99. 9
60,063. 96 . 56. 8
74. 780. 51
259. 01
4, 045. 00
33. 15-
1, 000. 00
80, 051. 37
57. 0
87. 8
0. 0
100. 8
0. 0
56. 7
44.693.75 28.7
44, 693. 75 28. 7
246. 61 76. 1
4, 008. 81 59. 6
75. 00 65. 1
1, 692. 27 37. 3
1, 558. 00 12. 8
5, 143. 00- 0. 0
2, 437. 69 76. 8
500. 00 0. 0
1, 500. 00 0. 0
2, 000.00 0.0
0. 00 • 129, 182. 91
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
18, 000. 56
882. 00
191. 88
1, 289. 59
20, 364. 03
50. 4
51. 0
0. 0
78. 2
64. 5
51. 7
Y
10
4 FINANCE-FA454
., , TIME 11:55:59
r-
• •
•
r
r
r
•
•
V1
L
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1203 PERSONNEL
DEPT:
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4320 MEDICAL EXAMS
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVING8
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
MGMT/SUPPORT
10. 000. 00
8. 500. 00
18, 500. 00
900. 00
4, 000. 00
495. 00
2, 870. 00
1, 500. 00
21. 800. 00
2, 288. 00-
29, 277. 00
760. 00
760. 00
90, 721. 00
1205 CABLE TV DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS --
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
22, 804. 00
0. 00
556. 00
556. 00
1, 820. 00
25, 736. 00
1. 000. 00
1, 000. 00
600. 00
1, 000. 00
510. 00
250. 00
705. 00
781. 00 -
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
3, 636. 49
0. 00
3, 636. 49
144. 44
661. 64
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2, 269. 00
0. 00
3, 075. 08
0.00
0.00
10. 577. 09
2, 080. 16
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
161.00
2. 241. 16
0.00
0.00
16, 609. 12
6, 432. 68
23. 041. 80
364.84
3,104.97
435. 00
487. 05
604. 98
8.544.00
0.00
13. 540. 84
0.00
0.00
58, 402. 61
13. 652. 36
10. 44
0. 00
73. 83
1. 162. 00
14, 898. 63
0.00
0.00
129.89 413.03
0.00 0. 00
0. 00 235. 00
0. 00 223. 00
0. 00 374. 95
0. 00 0. 00
PAGE 0006
DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE %
978. 72
0. 00
978. 72
0. 00
48. 60
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
48. 60
57. 46
57. 46
7, 587. 84- .
2. 067. 32
5, 520. 52-
535. 16
846. 43
60. 00
2, 382. 95
895. 02
13, 256. 00
2, 288. 00-
15, 687. 56
702. 54
702. 54
1,084.78 • 31,233.61
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
9. 151. 64
10. 44-
556. 00
482. 17
658. 00
10. 837. 37
1. 000. 00
1, 000. 00
186. 97
1. 000. 00
275. 00
27. 00
330. 05
781. 00-
175.8
75. 6
129. 8
40. 5
78. 8
87. 8
16.9
40. 3
39. 1
0.0
46. 4
7. 5
7. 5
65. 5
59. 8
0. 0
0. 0
13. 2
63. 8
57. 8
0.0
0.0
68. 8
0. 0
46. 0
89. 2
53. 1
0. 0
fi
r
r`
•
•
Ir
•
n
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1205 CABLE TV
DEPT:
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1206 DATA PROCESSING
•
CITY OF I1ERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
MGMT/SUPPORT
2, 284. 00
2.000.00
2.000.00
31, 020. 00
DEPT: MOMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL•
1207 BUS LICENSE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
71, 091. 00
500. 00
1. 720. 00
1. 720. 00
75. 031.00
93. 000. 00
93, 000. 00
3, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
3. 000. 00
670. 00
2, 000. 00
850. 00
5, 226. 00-
14. 294. 00
0. 00
14,330. 00
14. 330. 00
196. 655. 00
DEPT:-- MGMT/SUPPORT
78, 809. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
129. 89
0. 00
0. 00
2, 371. 05
6, 244. 66
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
6. 244. 66
13, 251. 17
13, 251. 17
506. 64
589. 90
334. 06
50. 00
0. 00
22.50
0: 00
1. 503. 10
310. 25
0. 00
310. 25
21, 309. 18
1, 245. 98
0. 00
0. 00
16. 144. 61
41. 933. 52
92. 28
0. 00
73. 83
42, 099. 63
40, 725. 98
40, 725. 98
1. 327. 47
3.902. 61
528. 49
320. 00
493. 10
485. 50
0. 00
7. 057. 17
310. 25
6. 499. 90
6, 810. 15
96, 692. 93
4, 974. 99 42, 482. 14
PAGE 0007
DATE 02/15/89
58. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 038. 02
2, 000. 00
2. 000. 00
14, 875. 39
54. 5
0. 0
0. 0
52. 0
0. 00 29, 157. 48 58. 9
0. 00 407. 72 18. 4
0. 00 1, 720. 00. 0. 0
0. 00 1, 646. 17 4. 2
0. 00 32, 931. 37 56. 1
420.68 51.853.34 44.2
420:68 • 51.853.34 44.2
• 0.00 1.672.53 44.2
3, 083. 18 3, 014. 21 69. 8
1, 269. 06 1, 202. 45 59. 9
0.OQ 350.00 47.7
0. 00 1, 506. 90 24. 6
0.00 364.50 57.1
0.00 5.226.00- 0.0
4, 352. 24 2, 884. 59 79. 8
0.00 310.25- 0.0
0. 00 7, 830. 10 45. 3
0. 00 7, 519. 85 47. 5
4, 772. 92 95, 189. 15 51. 5
0.00
36, 326. 86 • 53. 9
Ole
C
40
4 FINANCE-FA454
•i
TIME 11:55:59
�. FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1207 BUS LICENSE
•
•
r.
r
•
•
A
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MONT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
500. 00
1, 835. 00
1, 835. 00
0. 00
82, 979. 00
4. 035. 00
300. 00
4, 335. 00
400. 00
3, 000. 00
350. 00
400. 00
50. 00
500. 00
400. 00
2, 475. 00-
2, 625. 00
12, 000. 00
12, 000. 00
101, 939. 00
1208 GEN APPROP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ,
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL -- ---
39. 500. 00
0. 00
1, 022. 00
1. 022. 00
41, 544. 00
29. 599. 00
29, 599. 00
MONTHLY EXP
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
4, 974. 99
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
130. 56
141. 57
11. 35
0. 00
0. 00
69. 00
0. 00
0. 00
352. 48
0.00
0.00
'5,327.47
1, 160. 90
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
.1. 160. 90
1. 326. 78
1. 326. 78
YTD EXPND.
125. 70
9. 601. 79
505. 23
3, 305. 50
56. 020. 36
26. 70
52. 60
79. 30
275. 68
2, 181.07
112. 91
0. 00
40. 00
99. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2, 708. 66
0.00
0.00
58, 808. 32
11, 422. 90
33. 33
0. 00
0.00
11, 456. 23
13.207. 45
13, 207. 45
PAGE 0008
DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 03
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
374. 30
7, 766. 79- '
1, 329. 77
3. 305. 50-
26, 958. 64
4,008.30
247. 40
4,255.70
124. 32
818. 93
237. 09
400. 00
10. 00
401. 00
400. 00
2, 475. 00-
83. 66-
12. 000. 00
12, 000. 00
43, 130. 68
25. 1
523. 2
27.5
0.0
67. 5
0. 6
17. 5
1.8
68. 9
72. 7
32. 2
0.0
80. 0
19. 8
0.0
0.0
103. 1
0.0
0.0
57.6
28, 077. 10 28. 9
33. 33- 0. 0
1. 022. 00 0. 0
1, 022. 00 0. 0
30.087.77 27.5
16, 391. 55
16. 391. 55
44. 6
44. 6
Ai
4
•
410 •
A FINANCE-FA454
f'
r
•
•
A
r
•
•
r
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1208 GEN APPROP
DEPT:
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1212 EMP BENEFITS
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
MGMT/SUPPORT
2. 572. 00
0. 00
2, 075. 00-
497. 00
0. 00
760. 00
760. 00
15. 180. 00
15, 180. 00
87, 580. 00
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1213 RETIREMENT DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4180 RETIREMENT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
437. 393. 00
437, 393. 00
10, 935. 00-
10, 935. 00-
426. 458. 00
MGMT/SUPPORT
994. 689. 00
994. 689. 00
23, 534. 00-
23, 534. 00-
971, 155. 00
MONTHLY EXP
2, 571. 75
1. 191. 10-
0. 00
1, 380. 65
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 502. 96
1, 502. 96 .
5. 371. 29
YTD EXPND.
2, 571. 49
28, 577. 55-
0. 00
26, 006. 06-
0. 00
85. 15
85. 15
10, 512. 20
10, 512. 20
9, 254. 97
35,818.34 244.338.32
35, 818. 34 244, 338. 32
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
35. 818. 34
74, 445. 10
74. 445. 10
0. 00
0. 00
244, 338. 32
448. 930. 00
448, 930. 00
PAGE 0009
DATE 02/15/89
58. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE iL
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 51 99. 9
28, 577. 55 0. 0
2, 075. 00- 0. 0
26, 503. 06 5232. 6
0. 00 0. 0
674. 85 11. 2
674. 85 11. 2
4, 667. 80 69. 2
4, 667. 80 69. 2
78, 325. 03 10. 5
0. 00 193, 054. 68 55. 8
0. 00 193, 054. 68 55. 8
0. 00 10, 935. 00- 0. 0
0. 00 10, 935. 00- 0. 0
0. 00 182, 119. 68 57. 2
0.00 545.759.00 45.1
0.00 545.759.00 45.1
0. 00 0. 00 23, 534. 00- 0. 0
0.00 0.00 23.534.00- 0.0
74.445.10 448,930.00
0. 00 522, 225. 00 46. 2
00.
•
r
•
4
•
r
•
•
A
r
r
r
•
•
,
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1214 PROSP EXP
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0010
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
• 58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4322 UNCLASSIFIED
4397 2.57.. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS -
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
8, 981. 00
10, 000. 00-
1. 019. 00 -
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X
^1
• ",
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1. 019. 00- 0. 00
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2101 POLICE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY
4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME
4109 COURT TIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4114 POLICE RESERVES
4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
4118 FIELD TRAINING OFFICER
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
253, 494. 00
253, 494. 00
253, 494. 00
2. 557. 587. 00
DEPT: POLICE
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
363, 729. 00
1, 440, 939. 00
18. 480. 00
10. 200. 00
115, 000. 00
20, 500. 00
44, 031.00
44, 031.00
17. 800. 00
7. 500. 00
9, 318. 00
5, 500. 00
28, 050. 00
2. 125, 078. 00
43. 024. 00
127, 223. 00
170, 247. 00
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4301 DAMAGE SETTLEMENTS 5.000. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
18, 458. 00 161, 2013. 00
18, 458. 00 161. 208. 00
18. 458. 00 161. 208. 00
200. 576. 28 1, 304, 116. 99
31, 855. 62
116, 662. 66
1, 660. 00
1. 317. 64
6, 722. 06
912. 22
0. 00
775. 10
3, 761. 38
12. 00
800. 45
148. 52
2, 222. 02
146. 849. 67
4, 258. 13
0. 00
4, 258. 13
177, 837. 87
804, 422. 83
11. 865. 00
3. 622. 86
49, 271.94
8, 431. 00
9, 223. 43
35, 966. 07
14, 043. 25
5, 621. 25
3, 398. 90
2. 553. 16
19, 681. 63
1. 145, 939. 19
21, 862. 04
114. 884. 65
136, 746. 69
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
5, 857. 70
8,981.00
10, 000. 00-
1. 019. 00-
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
1, 019. 00- 0. 0
92. 286. 00
92, 286. 00
92. 286. 00
1, 247,612. 31
63. 5
63. 5
63. 5
51. 2
0. 00 185, 891. 13 48. 8
0. 00 636, 516. 17 55. 8
0. 00 6, 615. 00 64. 2
0. 00 6, 577. 14 35. 5
0. 00 65, 728. 06 42. 8
0. 00 12, 069. 00 41. 1
0. 00 34, 807. 57 20. 9
0. 00 8, 064. 93 81. 6
0. 00 3, 756. 75 78. 8
0. 00 . 1. 878. 75 74. 9
0. 00 5, 919. 10 36. 4
0. 00 2, 946. 84 46. 4
1. 862. 25 6. 506. 12 76. 8
1. 862. 25 977. 276. 56 54. 0
0. 00 21, 161. 96 50. 8
0. 00 12, 338. 35 90. 3
0. 00 33, 500. 31 80. 3
0.00 0.00 0.00 5.000.00 0.0
oelk
� r•
r
r-
• •
•
r
r
r
•
•
r i
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
2101 POLICE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0011
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE Z
DEPT: POLICE
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE
4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST
4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2201 FIRE
20.000. 00
26, 500. 00
6, 454. 00
1. 500. 00
6, 000. 00
17. 500. 00
21. 000. 00
17, 500. 00
7, 750. 00
1. 535. 00
5, 800. 00
1, 500. 00
58, 258. 00-
79. 781. 00
4. 074. 00
24, 878. 00
15. 194. 00
44, 146. 00
197. 045. 00
197, 045. 00
2, 616, 297. 00
2, 616. 297. 00
DEPT: FIRE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4108 FLSA OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
32, 512. 00
789. 201. 00
96, 000. 00
55, 000. 00
20, 808. 00
20, 808. 00
11, 100. 00
1, 025, 429. 00
7, 853. 75 13, 191. 34
2, 581. 73 17, 883. 56
1, 108. 94 3. 515. 63
149. 50 781. 22
1, 916. 72 5. 367. 00
1, 183. 77 10. 046. 88
3. 075. 42 11, 533. 41
2, 724. 27 9. 459. 76
266. 43 1, 505. 83
40.00 422.50
2. 041.82 5, 318. 27
0. 00 721. 61
0. 00 0. 00
22, 942. 35 79. 747. 01
499.49 499.49
2,343.00 9.568.06
0. 00 7, 691. 94
2. 842. 49 17, 759. 49
67. 380. 66 199, 645. 57
67, 380. 66 199, 645. 57
264. 273. 30 1, 579, 837. 95
0. 00
2, 173. 55
0. 00
0. 00
390. 53
0. 00
2, 208. 08
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
• 0. 00
4. 772. 16
1. 153. 40
13, 231. 03
0. 00
14. 384. 43
0.00
0. 00
21, 018. 84
6, 808. 66 65. 9
6, 442. 89 75. 6
2, 938. 37 54. 4
718. 78 52. 0
242. 47 95. 9
7, 453. 12 57. 4
7, 258. 51 65. 4
8, 040. 24 54. 0
6, 244. 17 19. 4
1, 112. 50 27. 5
481. 73 91. 6
778. 39 48. 1
58, 258. 00- 0. 0
4, 738. 17- 105. 9
2, 421. 11 40. 5
2, 078. 91 91. 6
7, 502. 06 50. 6
12, 002. 08 72. 8
2, 600. 57- 101. 3
2. 600. 57- 101. 3
1, 015. 440. 21 61. 1
264, 273. 30 1, 579, 837. 95 21, 018. 84 1. 015, 440. 21 61. 1
2, 733. 50
63. 089. 51
7. 824. 63
2, 458. 86
0. 00
0. 00
1. 912. 50
78, 019. 00
20, 292. 64
440, 581. 48
52, 984. 94
311696. 07
2. 278. 87
5, 174. 22
5.362. 43
558. 370. 65
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
12, 219. 36
348, 619. 52
43, 015. 06
23, 303. 93
18, 529. 13
15, 633. 78
5, 737. 57
467, 058. 35
62. 4
55. 8
55. 1
57. 6
10. 9
24. 8
48. 3
54. 4
1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT •(BY FUND) PAGE 0012
• ' TIME 11:55:59 FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
r, FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X
001 GENERAL FUND
2201 FIRE DEPT: FIRE
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 1, 000. 00 0. 00 258. 87 0. 00 741. 13 25. 8
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 31, 302. 00 0. 00 26, 163. 00 0. 00 5, 139. 00 83. 5
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 32, 302. 00 0. 00 26, 421. 87 0. 00 5, 880. 13 81. 7
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
✓ 4304 TELEPHONE 4, 000. 00 419. 47 1, 961. 72 0. 00 2, 038. 28 49. 0
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 2, 000. 00 206. 44 1. 759. 16 0. 00 240. 84 87. 9
4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 750.00 0.00 Q. 00 0.00 750.00 0.0
• 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 7.200.00 449. 11 3.809.08 292. 92 3.098.00 56.9
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 3, 600. 00 140. 58 1, 538. 35 O. 00 2, 061. 65 42. 7
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4,000.00 105.92 991.99 0.00 3.008.01 24.7
• 4315 MEMBERSHIP 650. 00 0.00 185. 00 0. 00 465.00 28. 4
4316 TRAINING 3. 000. 00 15. OQ 697. 34 O. 00 2, 302. 66 23. 2
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 750.00 150.00 411.28 0. 00 338. 72 54.8
A 4397 2. 5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS 28. 488. 00- O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 28, 488. 00- 0. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 538. 00- 1, 486. 52
11, 353. 92 292. 92 14. 184. 84- 458. 8
e 5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN 8500 275.00 120.29 621.91 0.00 346.91- 226. 1
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 10. 100. 00 0. 00 4. 420. 48 0. 00 5, 679. 52 43. 7
✓ OBJECT SUBTOTAL 10. 375. 00 120. 29 5. 042. 39 0. 00 5, 332. 61 48. 6
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
r
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 34, 838. 00 47. 62 7, 279. 01 0. 00 27, 558. 99 20. 8
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 34.838. 00 47. 62 7.279. 01 ' 0. 00 27, 558. 99 20. 8
DIVISION TOTAL 1. 100, 406. 00 79, 673: 43 608, 467. 84 • 292. 92 491, 645. 24 55. 3
rDEPARTMENT TOTAL 1, 100, 406. 00 79. 673. 43 608, 467. 84 292. 92 491, 645. 24 55. 3
2401 ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT: ANIMAL REGULTN
• 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 78,518. 00 7,317.30 46.367. 80 0.00 32, 150. 20 59.0
• 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1.000.00 125.64 322.30 0.00 677. 70 32.2
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 1, 925. 00 0. 00 . • 635. 55 0. 00 1, 289. 45 33. 0
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1, 925. 00 0. 00 503. 77 0. 00 1, 421. 23 26. 1
A 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 1, 000. 00 71. 40 521. 86 .0. 00 478. 14 52. 1
4187 UNIFORMS 300.00 18. 76 207. 14 0.00 92.86 69.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 84.668. 00 7. 533. 10 48. 558. 42 0. 00 36, 109. 58 57. 3
�_.
e
i�. •
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
4 FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT. (BY FUND) PAGE 0013
r TIME 11:55:59 FROM 01/0.1/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58. O% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE %
r
r'
•
•
1
r
r
001 GENERAL FUND
2401 ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT: ANIMAL REGULTN
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 1.800.00
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 5.000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6.800.00
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
' OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
r 2701 CIVIL DEFENSE
•
•
A
r•
r
400. 00
1. 800. 00
750. 00
1, 538. 00
2, 500. 00
50. 00
200. 00
550. 00
2, 824. 00-
4, 964. 00
1, 541.00
13, 000. 00
14. 541. 00
680. 00
680. 00
111, 653. 00
111. 653. 00
DEPT: DISASTER PREP
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
21, 464. 00
822. 00
822. 00
0. 00
23, 108. 00
1, 700. 00
1, 700. 00
0. 00
624. 82
624. 82
98. 79
3. 25
23. 91
61. 66
935. 74
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 123. 35
238. 07
1. 930. 42
2. 268. 49
245. 64
693. 87
56. 51
416. 70
2, 202. 39
0. 00
81. 27
0. 00
0. 00
3, 696. 38
0. 00 1, 461. 93
0. 00 3. 069. 58
0. 00 4, 531. 51
18.7
38. 6
33. 3
0. 00 154. 36 61. 4
0. 00 1, 106. 13 38. 5
0.00 693.49 7.5
.0. 00 1, 121. 30 27. 0
0. 00 297. 61 88. 0
0. 00 50. 00 0. 0
0.00 118.73 40.6
0. 00 . 550. 00 0. 0
0.00 2.824.00- 0.0
0. 00 1, 267. 62 74. 4
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 541. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 13, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 14, 541. 00 0. 0
56. 15•
56. 15
393. 05
393. 05
9, 337. 42 54. 916. 34
9, 337. 42 54, 916. 34
1, 929. 24
0. 00
O. 00 .
14.58
1, 943. 82 •
0. 00
0.00
13. 775. 63
0. 00
555. 25
87. 48
14. 418. 36
0.00 286.95 57.8
0.00 286.95 57.8
0.00 56.736.66 49.1
0. 00 56, 736. 66 49. 1
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
• 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0.00 0.00
7, 688. 37 64. 1
822. 00 0. 0
266. 75 67. 5
87. 48- 0. 0
8, 689. 64 62. 3
1, 700. 00
1, 700. 00
0. 0
0.0
•
•
•
r
r
•
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
2701 CIVIL DEFENSE
CITY OF HERMOSA.BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: DISASTER PREP
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4316 TRAINING
4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
3101 MEDIANS
0. 00
425. 00
500. 00
3, 300. 00
1, 169. 00-
3, 056. 00
6, 325. 00
6, 325. 00
34, 189. 00
34. 189. 00
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4397 2.57.. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
42, 676. 00
300. 00
1. 011. 00
1, 011. 00
0. 00
44. 998. 00
38, 000. 00
2, 200. 00
40. 200. 00
29, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
950. 00
500. 00
2. 960. 00-
32, 490. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 117,688.00
3103 ST MAINTENANCE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 129.824.00
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
Q. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 943. 82
1, 943. 82
2, 752. 77
0. 00-
0. 00
0. 00
414. 00
3. 166. 77
3, 000. 00
391. 33
3, 391. 33
660. 76
1, 065. 00
51. 95
76. 84
0. 00
1.854. 55
4. 20
0. 00
0. 00
290. 00
0. 00
294. 20
0. 00
0. 00
14. 712. 56
14. 712. 56
22. 139. 93
0. 00
428. 84
304. 43
921.00
23. 794. 20
15. 000. 00
1. 259. 05
16, 259. 05
11, 322. 88
1. 171. 35
416. 89
228. 71
0. 00
13. 139. 83
8, 412. 65 53, 193. 08
10, 556. 36 72. 251. 60
PAGE 0014
DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
Q. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
312. 68
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
312. 68
312. 68
0. 00
4. 20-
425. 00
500. 00
3,010.00
1,169.00-.
2, 761. 80
6. 325. 00
6. 325. 00
19. 476. 44
19, 476. 44
20, 536. 07
300. 00
582. 16
706. 57
921. 00-
21, 203. BO
23, 000. 00
940. 95
23, 940. 95
17, 677. 12
3. 515. 97
533. 11
271. 29
2. 960. 00-
19, 037. 49
64. 182. 24
0. 0
O. 0
0. 0
8. 7
O. 0
9. 6
0. 0
, 0. 0
43. 0
43. 0
51. 8
0. 0
42. 4
30. 1
0. 0
52. 8
39. 4
57. 2
40. 4
39. 0
29. 6
43. 8
45. 7
0. 0
41. 4
45. 4
57.572.40 55.6
4
•
•
A
r
r
r
r
•
•
r•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
3103 ST MAINTENANCE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT '(BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4316 TRAINING
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
2.000.00
3, 099. 00
3. 099. 00
138, 022. 00
79, 100. 00
79, 100. 00
19, 000. 00
3, 500. 00
10, 000. 00
445. 00
5. 245. 00-
27, 700. 00
3, 355. 00
3. 355. 00
20, 844. 00
20. 844. 00
269, 021. 00
3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
83, 172. 00
500. 00
2. 103. 00
2, 103. 00
4, 000. 00
91, 878. 00
9, 700. 00
6. 000. 00
15, 700. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0.00
0. 00
152. 64
10, 709. 00
5, 211. 33
5. 211. 33
1, 614. 54
240. 28
1, 805. 41
99. 00
0. 00
3, 759. 23
0.00
0.00 •
1,736.78
1,736.78
21, 416. 34
48. 00
446. 37
1, 687. 32
74, 433. 29
35.271. 66
35, 271.66
9. 179. 38
1, 896. 78
8. 056. 53
429. 00
0. 00
19, 561. 69
3. 354. 75
3, 354. 75
12. 157. 46 •
12, 157. 46
144. 778. 85
7.045.03 46.975.48
48. 48 216. 49
0. 00 445. 28
0. 00 1, 347. 01
0. 00 0. 00
7, 093. 51 • ' 48, 984. 26
312.50 4,632.23
616.83 2.621.10
929. 33 7,253.33
PAGE 0015
DATE 02/15/89
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00 '
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
. 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 952. 00 2. 4
2. 652. 63 14. 4
1, 411. 68 54. 4
63, 588. 71 53. 9
43, 828. 34 44. 5
43.828.34 44.5
9, 820. 62 48. 3
1, 603. 22 54. 1
1, 943. 47 80. 5
16. 00 96. 4
5, 245. 00- 0. 0
8, 138. 31 70. 6
0. 25 99. 9
0. 25 99. 9
8.686. 54 58. 3
8.686.54 58. 3
124, 242. 15 53. 8
36. 196. 52 56. 4
283.51 43.2
1.657.72 21.1
755.99 64.0
4,000.00 0.0
42, 893.74 • 53.3
5, 067. 77 47.7
3.378.90 43. 6
8.446.67 46. 1
A
4.1
e
4
r
•
•
r
•
t
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
- - - EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT •(BY FUND) PAGE 0016
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
001 GENERAL FUND
3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5, 600. 00
41, 000. 00
735. 00
600. 00
100. 00
250. 00
3,054. 00-
45. 231. 00
377. 74
13. 499. 18
0. 00
282. 51
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
14, 359. 43
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
11. 000. 00
11, 000. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 163.809.00
r DEPARTMENT TOTAL 550, 518. 00
4101 PLANNING DEPT: PLANNING
r
r
•
•
A
F'•
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
154.269. 00
700. 00
3.191. 00
3,191.00
2.740.00
164, 091. 00
1. 295. 00
1. 295. 00
1. 600. 00
12.326. 00
200. 00
500. 00
760. 00
841. 29
841. 29
23. 223. 56
53. 052. 55
11, 995. 65
0.00
0: 00
0. 00
121. 13
12. 116. 78
3. 2b4. 90
33. 960. 33
304. 10
506. 30
60. 00
230. 18
0.00
38. 265. 81
1. 996. 88
1. 996. BB
3. 365. 16
3. 365. 16
99, 845. 44
297, 837. 37
74. 493. 26
0. 00
940. 39
2, 601.24
2. 027. 27
80. 062. 16
0. 00
• 7, 026. 93
0. 00
127. 80
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
7. 154. 73
2. 395. 10
12. 74
430. 90
34. 10-
40. 00
19. 82
3. 054. 00-
189. 54-
57. 2
99. 9
41. 3
105. 6
60. 0
92. 0
0. 0
100. 4
0.00 1.996.88- 0.0
0. 00 1. 996. B8- 0. 0
1, 996. 87
1, 996. 87.
9, 151. 60
9. 464. 28
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00 120. 20 0. 00
0.00 , 120.20 0.00
278. 32
81O. 14
0.00
177. 46
40. 00
888. 18
8. 943. 05
52. 81
282. 38
260. 00
0. 00
.0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
5, 637. 97 48. 7
5, 637. 97 48. 7
54, 791. 96
243, 216. 35
79, 775. 74
700. 00
2, 250. 61
589. 76
712. 73
84, 028. 84
1, 174. BO
1, 174. 80
711. B2
3, 382. 95
147. 19
217. 62
500. 00
66. 5
55. 8
48. 2
0. 0
29. 4
81. 5
73. 9
48. 7
9. 2
9. 2
55. 5
72. 5
26. 4
56. 4
34. 2
4113
•
•�
r
r
r
•
•
4'
r
r-
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
4101 PLANNING
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: PLANNING
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN 4500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
1, 150. 00 112. 00
750. 00 0. 00
3. 901. 00- 0. 00
13, 385. 00 1, 417. 92
1, 200. 00 0. 00
500. 00 0. 00
1, 700. 00 0. 00
180, 471. 00
4102 PLANNING COMM DEPT: PLANNING
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
4201 BUILDING
DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN .
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
6. 120. 00
6. 120. 00
1. 700. 00
300. 00
550. 00
217. 00-
2, 333. 00
8, 453. 00
188. 924. 00
CONST/ENGIN/ENF
219, 661. 00
200. 00
5, 285. 00
5. 285. 00
230, 431. 00
38, 400. 00
13. 534. 70
272. 00
272. 00
112. 45.
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
112. 45
384. 45
13. 919. 15
16. 537. 73 •
0. 00
873. 04
0. 00
17. 41,0. 77
1. 012. 58
205. 00
0. 00
11, 644. 00
85. 19
0. 00
85. 19
91, 911. 55
2. 499. 00
2. 499. 00
1, 802. 16
279. 93
0. 00
0.00
2. 082. 09
4, 581. 09
96, 492. 64
122. 919. 76
0. 00
873. 04
1, 570. 48
125. 363. 28
O. 00 9, 389. 81
PAGE 0017
DATE 02/15/89
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
377. 80
.0. 00
377. 80
377. 80 .
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
• 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
377. 80
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
•O. 00
• 8. 723. 40
137. 42 88. 0
545. 00 27. 3
3, 901. 00- 0. 0
1. 741. 00 86. 9
737. 01 38. 5
500. 00 0. 0
1, 237. 01 27. 2
88. 181. 65 51. 1
3. 621. 00
3,621.00
40. 8
40. 8
102. 16- 106. 0
20. 07 93. 3
550. 00 0. 0
217. 00- 0. 0
250. 91 89. 2
3, 871. 91 54. 1
92. 053. 56 51. 2
96. 741. 24
200. 00
4, 411. 96
3. 714. 52
105, 067. 72
55. 9
0. 0
16. 5
29. 7
54. 4
21, 286. 79 44. 5
e
s
r
r
r
•
•
r
r
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
4201 BUILDING
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT .(BY FUND) PAGE 0018
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE %
DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
700. 00
39. 100. 00
2, 226. 00
11, 200. 00
1, 000. 00
900. 00
645. 00
2, 600. 00
1. 500. 00
7. 218. 00-
12. 853. 00
0. 00
1, 200. 00
12, 000. 00
13. 200. 00
0. 00
0. 00
531. 70
374. 30
43. 62
8. 00
0. 00
1, 150. 00
0. 00
0.00
2, 107. 62
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
295, 584. 00 19, 518. 39
4202 PUB WKS ADMIN DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4301 DAMAGE SETTLEMENTS
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
96,711.00
2. 336. 00
2. 336. 00
4, 000. 00
7, 000. 00
112, 383. 00
8, 500. 00
0. 00
8. 500. 00
4, 000. 00
5. 200. 00
8, 300. 00
8. 065. 73
0: 00
0. 00
500. 55
1, 081. 06
9, 647. 34
3, 012. 50
0.00.
3. 012. 50 •
b.00
1, 223. 99
1, 272. 25
286. 57
8, 676. 38
1, 294. 56
3, 508. 37
400. 51
803. 21
225. 00
1, 709. 00
1, 144. 20
0.00
9. 084. 85
0. 00
712. 25
0. 00
71..2. 25
0. 00
• 8, 723. 40
0. 00
699. 87
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
699. 87
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
143, 836. 76 9,423.27
54. 751. 54
222. 28
627. 23
4. 654. 34
3, 166. 34
63, 421. 73
7. 430. 99
0. 00
7, 430. 99
0. 00
2, 970. 87
5. 065. 72
•
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
479. 00
0. 00
479. 00
.0. 00
0. 00
342. 70
413. 43
21, 700. 22
931. 44
6, 991. 76
599. 49
96. 79
420. 00
891. 00
355. 80
7, 218. 00-
3, 068. 28
0. 00
487. 75
12, 000. 00
12, 487. 75
40. 9
44. 5
58. 1
37. 5
40. 0
89. 2
34. 8
65. 7
76. 2
0.0
76. 1
0.0
59. 3
0. 0
5.3
142, 323.97 51.8
41.959.46 56.6
2,113.72 9.5
1,708.77 26.8
654.34- 116.3
3,833.66 45. 2
48, 961.27 56.4
590. 01 93. 0
0. 00 0. 0
590. 01 93. 0
4, 000. 00 0. 0
2, 229. 13 57. 1
2, 891. 58 65. 1
r,
i•
y
r
•
•
•
r
r
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
4202 PUB WKS ADMIN
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT •(BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN *500
5403 VEHICLES
. OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
4204 BLDG MAINT
400. 00
900. 00
500. 00
630. 00
1. 500. 00
1. 000. 00
3, 726. 00-
18, 704. 00
400. 00
1, 600. 00
12, 000. 00
14. 000. 00
153, 587. 00
DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4316 TRAINING
4321 BUILDING SAFETY/SECURITY
4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
132, 944. 00
2, 500. 00
3. 177. 00
3. 177. 00
300. 00
142, 098. 00
17. 860. 00
17, 860. 00
75, 000. 00
30, 000. 00
1, 000. 00
1, 200. 00
500. 00
4, 200. 00
6. 650. 00-
105, 250. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
60. 00
141. 89
210. 00
108. 40
0. 00
0. 00
3, 016. 53
196. 22
0. 00
0. 00
196. 22
15.872. 59
11.364. 29'
378. 72
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
11, 743. 01
1, 324. 15
1, 324. 15
9, 571.29
7, 071. 60
48. 84 .
264.03 •
0. 00
2, 631. 06
b. 00
19. 586. 82
218. 49
434. 38
576. 84
462. 00
1, 966. 25
0. 00
0. 00
11, 694. 55
243. 31
0. 00
0. 00
243. 31
82. 790. 58
76. 682. 42
810. 89 .
27. 40
2. 905. 91
0. 00
80, 426. 62
8. 899. 99 •
8. 899. 99
47. 483. 44
22.211. 02
506. 39
441. 95
0. 00
4, 914. 31
0. 00
75, 557. 11
PAGE 0019
DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE ti
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
342. 70
420. 78
0. 00
0.00 •
420. 78
1.242. 48
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
980. 00
980. 00
0. 00
4, 825. 13
0. 00
0. 00
•0. 00
2, 608. 08
0. 00
7. 433. 21
181. 51
465. 62
76. 84-
168. 00
466. 25-
1. 000. 00 •
3. 726. 00-
6. 666. 75
264. 09-
1, 600. 00
12, 000. 00
13, 335. 91
54. 6
48. 2
115. 3
73. 3
131. 0
0. 0
0. 0
64. 3
166. 0
0. 0
0. 0
4. 7
69, 553. 94 54. 7
56, 261. 58
1, 689. 11
3. 149. 60
271. 09
300. 00
61, 671. 38
7. 980. 01
7, 980. 01
27, 516. 56
2, 963. 85
493. 61
758. 05
500. 00
3. 322. 39-
6, 650. 00-
22, 259. 68
57. 6
32. 4
0. 8
91. 4
0. 0
56. 5
55. 3
55. 3
63. 3
90. 1
50. 6
. 36. 8
0. 0
179. 1
0. 0
78. 8
o'
A'
r
e-
• •
•
A
r
r
•
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
DIVISION TOTAL 265, 208. 00 32, 653. 98 164, 883. 72
4205 EQUIP SERVICE DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT 'MY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
.",
PAGE 0020
DATE 02/15/89 ..,
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE iG
R,
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4316 TRAINING
4397 2.57.. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
91. 095. 00
200. 00
2, 186. 00
2, 186. 00
95, 667. 00
3, 495. 00
2,000. 00
2. 780. 00
255. 00
2, 927. 00-
5. 603. 00
7,613.08
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
7,613.08
527. 58
539. 46
157. 29
0. 00
O. 00
1. 224. 33
51. 982. 45
76. 37
278. 89
573. 43
52, 911. 14
2. 576. 56
883. 40
1, 611. 56
255. 00
0. 00
5, 326. 52
8, 413. 21
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
301. 75
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
301. 75
•
91, 911. 07 65. 3
39, 112. 55
123. 63
1, 907. 11
1, 612. 57
42. 755. 86
616. 69
1, 116. 60
1. 168. 44
0. 00
2, 927. 00-
25. 27-
57. 0
38. 1
12. 7
26. 2
55. 3
82. 3
44. 1
57. 9
100. 0
0. 0
100. 4
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 1, 720. 00 O. 00 1, 719. 78 O. 00 0. 22 99.9 ,..s
5403 VEHICLES 8, 000. 00 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 8, 000. 00 0. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 9, 720. 00 O. 00 1, 719. 78 0. 00 8, 000. 22 17. 6
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6.828. 00 417. 96 2,925. 72 ' O. 00 3,902. 28 42. 8
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6, 828. 00 417. 96 2, 925. 72 - O. 00 3, 902. 28 42. 8 ..t
• ^4
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
4601 COMM RESOURCES
117. 818. 00
832, 197. 00
DEPT: COMM PROMOTION
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
135. 065. 00
500. 00
3. 741. 00
3,741.00
49, 000. 00
192, 047. 00
9.255..37 62.883.16
77,300.33 454.394.22
13, 167. 67
0. 00 •
0.00'
0. 00
2, 071.01
15. 238. 68
56.525.00 4.781.50
•
71. 901. 30
175. 50
1. 129. 87
2. 051. 28
30, 829. 95
106. 087. 90
301. 75
19, 380. 71
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
• 0. 00
0. 00
'O. 00
17, 167. 55 0. 00
54.633.09 53.6
358,422.07 56.9
63, 163. 70
324. 50
2, 611. 13
1, 689. 72
18, 170. 05
85, 959. 10
39, 357. 45
53. 2
35. 1
30. 2
• 54. 8
62. 9
55. 2
30. 3
•
• FINANCE-FA434 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT' (BY FUND)
PAGE 0021
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
TIME 11:53:39 FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
r., FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE ti
001 GENERAL FUND -- _
4601 COMM RESOURCES DEPT: COMM PROMOTION
•
1
r
r
•
•
r
r•
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER'
4302 ADVERTISING
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4319 SPECIAL EVENTS
4397 2. 57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN *500
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
6101 PARKS
56. 525. 00 4, 781. 50
3. 500. 00
5. 300. 00
6, 350. 00
4. 000. 00
500. 00
100. 00
625. 00
1.000. 00
1. 600. 00
10, 000. 00
6. 660. 00-
26, 315. 00
10. 700. 00
44. 700. 00
8, 000. 00
63, 400. 00
2. 300. 00
2. 300. 00
340. 587. 00
340, 587. 00
DEPT: PARKS/REC
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
68, 532. 00
500. 00
1, 638. 00
1, 638. 00
0. 00
72, 308. 00
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 107.020.00
74. 55
509. 74
402. 41
272. 42
18. 50
63. 75
0. 00
99. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 440. 37
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
189. 21
189. 21
21, 649. 76
21, 649. 76
17. .167. 55 0. 00
74. 55
2. 075. 38
6, 267. 56
2, 302. 86
143. 20
63. 75
107. 50
509. 83
347. 75
6, 006. 45
0. 00
17. 898. 83.
1. 996. 87
2, 077.70
0. 00
4. 074. 57
1, 316. 98
1. 316. 98
146, 545. 83
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
•
3. 306. 23
0. 00
0. 00
3, 306. 23
. O. 00
0. 00
3, 306. 23
146, 545. 83 3.306. 23
4. 433. 49 , 35, 157. 94
0. 00 • 0. 00
0. 00 • ' 198. 70
0. 00 304. 43
6Z1. 00 1, 381. 50
5.054.49 37.042.57
8, 710. 00 47, 540. 00
0. 00
0. 00
• 0. 00
0.00
• 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
39, 357. 45 30. 3
3, 425. 45
3, 224. 62
82. 44
1, 697. 14
356. 80
36. 25
517. 50
490. 17
1, 252. 25
3, 993. 55
6. 660. 00-
8. 416. 17
5, 396. 90
42, 622. 30
8, 000. 00
56. 019. 20
2. 1
39. 1
98. 7
57. 5
28. 6
63. 7
17. 2
50. 9
21. 7
60. 0
0. 0
68. 0
49. 5
4. 6
0. 0
11. 6
983. 02 57. 2
983. 02 57. 2
190, 734. 94 43. 9
190, 734. 94 43. 9
33, 374. 06 51. 3
500. 00 O. 0
1, 439. 30 ' 12. 1
1, 333. 57 18.
1, 381. 50- 0. 0
35, 265. 43 51. 2
59, 480. 00 44. 4
• FINANCE-FA454
c
•
•
c
r
•
•
r
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
6101 PARKS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/3.1/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: PARKS/REC
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4304 TELEPHONE
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4397 2. 5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5490 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8176 CIP 86-176
12, 600. 00
- 119, 620. 00
19, 000. 00
120. 00
9, 420. 00
800. 00
1. 450. 00
660. 00
500. 00
5, 886. 00-
26, 064. 00
15, 000. 00
15, 000. 00
232, 992. 00
232, 992. 00
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8601 CIP 86-601
40. 200. 00
40. 200. 00
1, 005. 00-
1, 005. 00-
39, 195. 00
39. 195. 00
DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
3, 000. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
8, 710. 00
2, 814. 66
53. 87
662. 85
21. 94
5. 15
0. 00
99. 00
0. 00
3. 657. 47
0. 00
0. 00
17,421.96
17, 421. 96
418. 50
418. 50
0. 00
0. 00
418. 50
418.50.
•
0. 00
47. 340. 00
12, 003. 34
59. 86
7, 969. 41
329. 66
482. 25
167. 00
99. 00
0. 00
21, 110. 52
0.00
0. 00
105. 693. 09
105. 693. 09
1, 248. 40
1, 248. 40
0. 00
0. 00
1, 248. 40
1. 248. 40
0. 00 615. 00
PAGE 0022
DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE Z
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
446. 00
0. 00
0. 00
•0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
446. 00
0. 00
0. 00
446. 00
446. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
12. 600. 00
72.080. 00
6. 996. 66
60. 14
1, 004. 59 •
470. 34
967. 75
493. 00
401. 00
5, 886. 00-
4. 507. 48
15, 000. 00
15. 000. 00
126, 852. 91
126. 852. 91
0. 0
39. 7
63. 1
49. 8
89. 3
41. 2
33. 2
25. 3
19. 8
0. 0
82. 7
0. 0
0. 0
45. 5
45. 5
38, 951.60 3. 1
38, 951. 60 3. 1
1, 005. 00- 0. 0
1, 005. 00- 0. 0
37. 946. 60 3. 1
37. 946. 60 3. 1
2, 385. 00 20. 5
e
•
•
•
r
r
•
•
A
r
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
8601 CIP 86-601
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT• (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4397 2. 57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
3, 000. 00
75. 00-
75. 00-
2, 925. 00
8602 CIP 86-602 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
. OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4397 2. 57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
88, 298. 00
88, 298. 00
0. 00
625. 00-
625. 00-
87. 673. 00
8604 CIP 86-604 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 40,150.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 40, 150. 00
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
0. 00
949. 00-
949. 00-
39, 201. 00
8606 CIP 87-606 DEPT: BLOCS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 109,024.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 109, 024. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2. 40
2. 40
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2.40••
7. 768. 33
7, 768. 33
&15. 00
0.00
0. 00
615. 00
39, 672. 00
39. 672. 00
11. 86
0. 00
11. 86
39, 683. 86
8. 962. 54
8, 962. 54
1, 757. 25
0. 00
1, 757. 25
10, 719. 79
64, 677. 46
• 64, 677. 46
PAGE 0023
DATE 02/15/89
58.07. QF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
687.00 •
687. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
687. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2, 300. 00
• 0. 00
2, 300. 00
2, 300. 00
4, 800. 00
• 4, 800. 00
2. 385. 00 20. 5
75. 00- 0. 0
75. 00- 0. 0
2, 310. 00 21. 0
47, 939. 00 45. 7
47, 939. 00 45. 7
11. 86- 0. 0
625. 00- 0. 0
636. 86- 1. 8
47, 302. 14 46. 0
31. 187. 46 22. 3
31, 187. 46 22. 3
4, 057. 25- 0. 0
949. 00- 0. 0
5. 006. 25- 427. 5
26.181.21 33.2
39, 546. 54
39, 546. 54
•
63. 7
63. 7
-i
•
•
r
r
r^
•
•
•
r
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
8606 CIP 87-606
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT• (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS
5602 IMPRVMTS OTHER THN BLDGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
109. 024. 00
8610 CIP 88-610 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
94, 974. 00
94, 974. 00
1, 843. 00-
1, 843. 00-
93. 131. 00
8612 CIP 88-612 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 10,000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 10.000.00
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
0. 00
250. 00-
250. 00-
9. 750. 00
8614 CIP 88-614 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 37,800.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 37, 800. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
1. 28
1. 28
0. 00
0.00
7, 769. 61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00'
0.00
0.00
693. 16
0. 00
693. 16
693. 16. •
2)78. 75
678. 75
1. 996. 16
1, 996. 16
67, 352. 37
2. 739. 37
2, 739. 37
0. 00
0. 00
2. 739. 37
800. 00
800. 00
1, 078. 60
0. 00
1. 078. 60
1, 878. 60
276.84 477.47
276.84 477.47
PAGE 0024
DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
4, 800. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
. 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
678. 75- 0. 0
678. 75- 0. 0
1, 996. 16- 0. 0
1, 996. 16- • 0. 0
36, 871. 63 66. 1
92, 234. 63 2. 8
92, 234. 63 2. 8
1, 843. 00- 0. 0
1. 843. 00- 0. 0
90, 391. 63 2. 9
9, 200. 00 8. 0
9, 200. 00 8. 0
1. 078. 60- 0. 0
250. 00- 0. 0
1,328.60- 431.4
7, 871. 40 19. 2
37. 322. 53
37, 322. 53
1. 2
1. 2
r
r
r
•'
•
•
r
r
•
•
r•
r
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 - - ---- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0025
TIME 11:55:59 FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
001 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND
8614 CIP 88-614 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
37, 800. 00
379, 504. 00
9, 344, 603. 00
276. 84
8, 742. 01
770, 100. 28
477. 47
123, 466. 46
4, 959, 412. 63
0. 00
7, 787. 00
68, 063. 90
37, 322. 53
248, 250. 54
4, 317, 126. 47
1. 2
34. 5
53. 8
c
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
r. FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
r i
r
•
•
c
r
•
•
DEPT:
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2601 STREET LIGHTING
DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4180 RETIREMENT
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4304 TELEPHONE
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4316 TRAINING
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
MGMT/SUPPORT
30. 500. 00
30, 500. 00
30. 500. 00
30, 500. 00
STREET LIGHTING
68, 904. 00
1. 000. 00
1, 650. 00
1. 650. 00
4, 000. 00
11, 394. 00
8,751.00
97. 349. 00
18, 150. 00
8, 000. 00
26, 150. 00
180. 000. 00
300. 00
12, 500. 00
2, 500. 00
5. 500. 00
500. 00
201, 300. 00
0. 00
0. 00
324, 799. 00
324. 799. 00
MONTHLY EXP
375. 00
375. 00
375. 00
375. 00
6, 053. 85
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
556. 02
680. 09
7, 289. 96
0. 00 '
1, 008. 17
1, 008. 17
29, 881. 55
0. 00
1. 154. 65
212. 50
915. 80
99. 00
32, 263. 50
0. 00
0. 00
40, 561. 63
40, 561. 63
YTD EXPND.
13, 455. 00
13, 455. 00
13, 455. 00
13. 455. 00
40. 997. 17
0. 00
27. 40
893. 83
0. 00
3, 686. 12
4. 204. 08
49, 808. 60
6, 500. 00
3. 012. 43
9. 512. 43
90, 483. 99
64. 81
3, 870. 67
1, 298. 98
3, 474. 55
99. 00
99, 292. 00
0. 00
0. 00
158. 613. 03
158. 613. 03
PAGE 0026
DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
17. 045. 00
17, 045. 00
17, 045. 00
17, 045. 00
44. 1
44. 1
44. 1
44. 1
0. 00 27, 906. 83 59. 4
0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 1, 622. 60 1. 6
0.00 756.17 54.1
0. 00 4, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 • 7. 707. 88 32. 3
0.00 4.546.92 48.0
O. 00 47. 540. 40 51. 1
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
101. 28
0.00
0. 00
0. 00.
101. 28
2, 690. 19
2, 690. 19
2, 791. 47
2, 791. 47
11, 650. 00 35. 8
4, 987. 57 37. 6
16, 637. 57 36. 3
89, 516. 01 50. 2
235. 19 21. 6
8, 528. 05 31. 7
1, 201. 02 51. 9
2. 025. 45 63. 1
401.00 19. 8
101, 906. 72 49. 3
2, 690. 19- 0. 0
2, 690. 19- 0. 0
163, 394. 50 49. 6
163, 394. 50 49. 6
'0.
r
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
r. FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND
8201 CIP 65-201
r
r
r
•
•
t
r
r
•
•
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: STREET LIGHTING
0. 00
0. 00
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE- - 44,000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 44, 000. 00
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER-
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
0. 00
0. 00
44. 000. 00
8202 CIP 85-202 DEPT: STREET LIGHTING
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL.
49, 500. 00
49. 500. 00
49, 500. 00
8203 CIP 85-203 DEPT: STREET LIGHTING
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
27. 500. 00
27, 500. 00
27, 500. 00
121, 000. 00
476. 299. 00
MONTHLY EXP
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 .
14, 506. 55
14, 506. 55
14, 506. 55
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
14. 506. 55
55. 443. 18
YTD EXPND.
180. 00
180. 00
4, 654. 59
4, 654. 59
0. 00
0. 00
4, 834. 59
14, 506. 55
14, 506. 55
14, 506. 55
620. 00
620. 00
620. 00
19, 961. 14
192. 029. 17
PAGE 0027
DATE 02/15/89
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE iG
0. 00
0. 00
4, 561. 40
4. 561. 40
873. 56
873. 56
5, 434. 96
2, 530. 05 .
2. 530. 05
. 2, 530. 05
o. do
0. 00
0. 00
7, 965. 01
10, 756. 48
180. 00- . 0. 0
180. 00- 0. 0
34, 784. 01 20. 9
34, 784. 01 20. 9
873. 56- 0. 0
873. 56- 0. 0
33,730.45 23.3
32, 463. 40 34. 4
32, 463. 40 34. 4
32.463.40 34.4
26, 880. 00
26, 880. 00
26, 880. 00
93, 073. 85
273, 513. 35
2. 2
2.2
2. 2
23. 0
42. 5
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
f. FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
110 PARKING FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
r
i.
•
A
r
•
i
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT .(BY FUND) PAGE 0028
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
3301 VEH PKG DIST
1. 434, 013. 00
- 1. 434, 013. 00
1.434, 013.00
1.434. 013. 00
DEPT: PKG FACILITIES
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4180 RETIREMENT.
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
14. 553. 00
0. 00
358. 00
358. 00
2. 997. 00
977. 00
19, 243. 00
44. 361. 00
44, 361. 00
100. 00
200.00
1, 000. 00
1, 300. 00
700. 00
700. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 65.604.00
3302 PARKING ENF DEPT: PKG FACILITIES
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
473. 598. 00
10, 000. 00
11, 579. 00
119, 501. 00
119, 501. 00
119, 501. 00
119, 501. 00
836, 507. 00
836, 507. 00
836, 507. 00
836, 507. 00
971. 92 8, 141. 34
0. 00 2. 33
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
177.77 909.63
66. 71 648. 89
1, 216. 40 9, 702. 19
2.902. 90 22. 809. 68
2,902.90' 22.809. 68
23.43 131.11
83. 64 139. 29
0.00 0.00
107:07 270.40
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
4.226.37 32.782.27
36, 63`/. 33
1, 130. 47
744. 31
256, 025. 38
6, 457. 02
1, 379. 86
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
597, 506. 00
597, 506. 00
597, 506. 00
597, 506. 00 •
58. 3
58. 3
58. 3
58. 3
0. 00 6, 411. 66 55. 9
0.00 2.33- 0.0
0.00 358.00 0.0
0.00 358.00 0.0
0. 00 2, 087. 37 30. 3
0. 00 328. 11 66. 4
0. 00 9, 540. 81 50. 4
0. 00 21. 551. 32 51. 4
0. 00 21, 551.32 51. 4
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
31. 11- 131. 1
60. 71 69. 6
1, 000. 00 0. 0
1, 029. 60 20. 8
700. 00 0. 0
700. 00 0. 0
0.00 32, 821.73 49.9
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
217, 572. 62
3, 542. 98
10, 199. 14
54. 0
64. 5
11.9
•
•
r
0
••
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
i+ FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
110 PARKING FUND
3302 PARKING ENF DEPT: PKG FACILITIES
r
•
•
r
r
•
•
r
r•
CITY OF HERMOSA REACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0029
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.0%. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE ti
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
4180 RETIREMENT
4187 UNIFORMS
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4301 DAMAGE SETTLEMENTS
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN 4500
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
11. 579. 00
45, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
68. 579. 00
4, 000. 00
60, 732. 00
690, 067. 00
5. 000. 00
5, 000. 00
1, 000. 00
3, 000. 00
44, 599. 00
19, 373. 00
8, 000. 00
8, 665. 00
400. 00
2, 000. 00
2, 000. 00
89, 037. 00
0. 00
401. 00
28. 691. 00
28, 500. 00
57. 592. 00
8. 500. 00
8, 500. 00
850, 196. 00
915, SOO. 00
2, 349, 813. 00
0. 00
280. 00
286. 11
4, 582. 82
244. 58
4. 322. 12
48, 227. 74
964. 84
964. 84
0.00
821. 10
2,618. 62
1.001. 97
296. 07
1, 880. 55
120. 00
59. 56
889. 23
7, 687. 10
4. 645. 45
307. 48
0. 00
0. 00
4, 952. 93
114. 00
114. 00
•
2, 400. 95
12, 643. 50
2, 798. 37
26, 904. 95
2, 505. 23
28. 785. 34
339, 800. 60
2. 429. 07
2, 429. 07
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
9, 178. 05 20. 7
32, 356. 50 28. 0
2, 201. 63 55.9
41.774. 05 39. 0
1,494.77 62.6
31, 946. 66 47.3
350, 266.40 49.2
2. 570. 93 48. 5
2. 570. 93 48. 5
0. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0
1. 490. 11 0. 00 1, 509. 89 49. 6
15, 538. 01 3. 495. 80' 25, 565. 19 42.6
7. 272. 14 4.905.26 7.195.60 62. 8
3. 487. 02 0. 00 4, 512. 98 43. 5
6, 318. 85 3, 865. 95 1, 519. 80- 117. 5
240.00 0.00 160.00 60.0
2, 018. 43 0. 00 •18. 43- 100. 9
1, 366. 23 . 0. 00 633.77 68.3
37, 730. 79 12, 267. 01 39, 039. 20 56. 1
4,645.45 0. 00 4; 645. 45- 0. 0
1, 417. 65 • 0.00 1.016.65- 353.5
0. 00 15. 959. 77 12, 731.23 55.6
0. 00 0. 00 28, 500. 00 0. 0
6, 063. 10 15, 959. 77 35, 569. 13 38. 2
7, 611. 41
7. 611. 41
61. 946. 61 393, 634. 97
66, 172. 98 426, 417. 24
185, 673. 98 1, 262, 924. 24
0.00
0.00
28. 226. 78
28. 226. 78
.28,226. 78
888. 59 89. 5
888. 59 89. 5
428, 334. 25
461. 155. 98
1.058,661. 98
49.6
49. 6
54. 9
1'
r
r
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT.(BY FUND) PAGE 0030
TIME 11:55:59 FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/3/89 DATE 02/15/89 --
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % .-
115 STATE GAS TAX FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 86, 250. 00 6. 355. 00 54, 480. 00 0. 00 31, 770. 00 63. 1
OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 86, 250. 00 6, 355. 00 54, 480. 00 0. 00 31, 770. 00 63. 1
DIVISION TOTAL 86, 250. 00 6. 355. 00 54, 480. 00 0. 00 31, 770. 00 63. 1
r DEPARTMENT TOTAL 86, 250. 00 6. 355. 00 54, 480. 00 0. 00 31, 770. 00 63. 1
• 3101 MEDIANS DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN
•
It
r.'
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 0.0
DIVISION TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
�. 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
•
•
A
r
DIVISION TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 • 0.00 0.00 0.0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
8160 CIP 85-160 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 132, 600. 00 0. 00 38, 470. 50 0. 00 94, 129. 50 29. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 132, 600. 00 0. 00 38, 470. 50 0. 00 94, 129. 50 29. 0
DIVISION TOTAL 132, 600. 00 0. 00 • 38, 470. 50 0. 00 94, 129. 50 29. 0
8165 CIP 87-165
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY •
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
19. 351. 00
19, 351. 00
0. 00 389. 00
0. 00 389. 00
240. 00
240. 00
18. 722. 00
18, 722. 00
3. 2
3. 2
•
•
r
r
r
r'
•
•
fr
f
r
•
•
A
(.
F I NANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
115 STATE GAS TAX FUND
DIVISION TOTAL
8170 CIP 87-170
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT' (BY FUND) PAGE 0031
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
19. 351. 00 0. 00
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
137, 500. 00
137, 500. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 137, 500. 00
8171 CIP 87-171 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
149. 755. 00
149, 755. 00
DIVISION • TOTAL 149.755.00
8174 CIP 88-174 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8302 CIP 87-302
132, 000. 00
132. 000. 00
132, 000. 00
571. 206. 00
DEPT: STORM DRAIN
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
64, 896. 00
64, 896. 00
64. 896. 00
64, 896. 00
722, 352. 00
266. 52
266. 52
266. 52
5, 820. 39
5, 820. 39
5, 820. 39
0. 00_
0. 00
0. 00
6, 086. 91
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00-
0. 00
12. 441. 91
389.00 240.00
288. 52
288. 52
288. 52
59, 459. 96
59, 459. 96
59, 459. 96
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
98, 607. 98
34, 549. 04
34, 549. 04
34. 549. 04
34, 549. 04
187. 637. 02
18:722. 00 3. 2
0. 00 137, 211. 48 0. 2
0. 00 137, 211.48 0. 2
0. 00 137, 211. 48 0. 2
0. 00 90, 295. 04 39. 7
0. 00 90, 295. 04 39. 7
0.00 90,295.04 39.7
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
240. 00
• 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
240. 00
132, 000. 00 0. 0
132, 000. 00 0. 0
132. 000. 00 0. 0
472, 358. 02 17. 3
30. 346. 96
30, 346. 96
30, 346. 96
30, 346. 96
534. 474. 98
53. 2
53. 2
53. 2
53. 2
26. 0
r
•
•'
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
f.. FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES
8502 GIP 85-502
r
•
•
1
r -
r.
r
•
•
R
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT •(BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: PARKS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
5, 500. 00
5. 500. 00
0.00
0.00
5, 500. 00
6506 CIP 86-506 DEPT: PARKS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS
5602 IMPRVMTS OTHER THN BLDGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
8507 CIP 87-507
10, 000. 00
10, 000. 00
0.00
0. 00
10, 000. 00
DEPT: PARKS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
5, 100. 00
5, 100. 00
5, 100. 00
8508 CIP 87-508 DEPT: PARKS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
121, 000. 00
121, 000. 00
121. 000. 00
141, 600. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
4, 744. 58
4. 744. 58
4,744.58'
0. 00
0:00
0.00
0.00-
0. 00 •
0. 00
4, 744. 58
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
506. 35
506. 35
9. 445. 49
9, 445. 49
9. 951.84
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1. 055. 41
1, 055. 41
1,055.41
• 11.007.25
PAGE 0032
DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE ti
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
• 0. 00
0.00
5. 500. 00
5, 500. 00
0.00
0.00 •
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
5, 500. 00 0. 0
9, 493. 65
9, 493. 65
9, 445. 49-
9, 445. 49-
48. 16
5. 100. 00
5. 100. 00
5, 100. 00
119. 944. 59
119, 944. 59
119, 944. 59
130. 592. 75
5. 0
5. 0
0. 0
0. 0
99.5
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 8
. 0. 8
0. 8
7. 7
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT •(BY FUND) PAGE 0033
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION
125 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND
8508 CIP 87-508 DEPT: PARKS
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
FUND TOTAL 141, 600.00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
4, 744. 58
11, 007. 25
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X
0.00
130, 592. 75 7. 7
O
•'
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
126 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND
r 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT ,(BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 '
PAGE 0034
DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
r
• ,
•
•
r
r
r-
• •
•
1
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
0. 00 0. 00 • 0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00 0.0
0. 00 0. 0
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT• (BY FUND) PAGE 0035
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
r FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION
127 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND
r
r
r
r•
f
r
r
r
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 1.041.954.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 041, 954.00
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
1, 041, 954. 00
1, 041. 954. 00
1. 041. 954. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
86.829. 00
86, 829. 00
86, 829. 00
86, 829. 00
86, 829. 00
607.806. 00
607, 806. 00
607, 806. 00
607, 806. 00
607. 806. 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00 434, 148. 00 ' 58. 3
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
.0.00
434, 148. 00 58. 3
434, 148. 00
434, 148. 00
434, 148. 00
58. 3
58. 3
58. 3
0
.;
� I
c
•
1'
r
r
•
r
r
r
•
•
A
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
130 REVENUE SHARING FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT. (BY FUND) PAGE 0036
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL -
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
39, 000. 00
39, 000. 00
39, 000. 00
39. 000. 00
39. 000. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
3. 250. 00
3. 250. 00
3, 250. 00
3, 250. 00
3, 250. 00
22. 750. 00
22, 750. 00
22, 750. 00
22, 750. 00
22. 750. 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE Z
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
16, 250. 00
16, 250. 00
16, 250. 00
16, 250. 00 •
16, 250. 00
58. 3
58. 3
58. 3
58. 3
58. 3
i
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:53:59
�. FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND
3401 DIAL A RIDE
r
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4180 RETIREMENT
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
r^ 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
•
•
1
r
r
r-
• •
•
7
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE -
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION •TOTAL
3402 COMMUTER BUS
14. 730. 00
2, 004. 00
1. 078.00
17, 812. 00
142, 820. 00
142, 820. 00
30. 00
300. 00
350. 00
160, 982. 00
DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4180 RETIREMENT
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
4, 931. 00
666. 00
372. 00
5, 969. 00
40. 000. 00
40, 000. 00
0. 00
0. 00
45. 969. 00
3403 BUS PASS SUBSDY DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
1. 498. 00
0.00
36. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
1. 386. 22
168. 96
121. 70
1, 676. 88
0.00
0.00
8.32
0. 00
8. 32
1, 685. 20
509. 67.
56. 60
42. 64
608. 91
0, 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
8, 570. 01
938. 64
625. 98
10, 134. 63
0. 00
0.00
24. 96
10. 14
35. 10
10, 169. 73
3, 004. 06
315.65
219. 64
3, 539. 35
0. 00
0. 00
6. 00
6. 00
608. 91 • 3, 545. 35
•
1, 213. 32-
0. 00
0. 00
125. 84
5. 76
0. 00
PAGE 0037
DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
0. 00 6, 159. 99 58. 1
0.00 1.065.36 46.8
0.00 452.02 58.0
0.00 7,677.37 56.8
0.00 142,820.00 0.0
.0. 00 142,820.00 0.0
0.00 25.04 49.9
0. 00 . 289. 86 3. 3
0. 00 314. 90 10. 0
0. 00 150, 812. 27 6. 3
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
• 0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 926. 94 60. 9
350. 35 47. 3
152. 36 59. 0
2, 429. 65 59. 2
40, 000. 00 0. 0
40. 000. 00 0. 0
6. 00- 0. 0
6. 00- 0. 0
42, 423. 65 7. 7
1, 372. 16
5. 76-
36. 00
8. 4
0. 0
0. 0
•
r
r
•
r
r-
• •
•
fi
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0038
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION
145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND
3403 BUS PASS SUBSDY DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4180 RETIREMENT
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
36. 00
203. 00
126. 00
1, 899. 00
16, 048. 00
16, 048. 00
70. 00
70. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 18.017.00
3406 CIRC ELEMENT DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
17, 735. 00
17. 735. 00
17, 735. 00
242. 703. 00
242, 703. 00
•
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE Y.
0. 00
15. 94
8.12
1, 189. 26-
1, 480. 00
1, 480. 00
0. 00
0. 00
290. 74
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
2.584.85
.2.584.85
0. 00
93. 84
83. 21
308. 65
4.871. 00
4, 871. 00
0. 00
0. 00
5, 179. 65
0.00
0.00
0. 00
18. 894. 73
18.894. 73
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
36. 00 . 0. 0
109. 16 46. 2
42. 79 66. 0
1, 590. 35 16. 2
11, 177. 00 30. 3
11, 177. 00 30. 3
70. 00 0. 0
70. 00 0. 0
12.837.35 28.7
• 17, 735. 00
17, 735. 00
17, 735. 00
223, 808. 27
223, 808. 27
0. 0
0.0
0.0
7. 7
7. 7
At 4
.01
f.
(w•
R
r
•
A
r
•
•
f'.
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
150 GRANT FUND
8102 CIP 85-102
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0039
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
118, 800. 00
118, 800. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 118, 800. 00
8137 CIP 85-137 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
72, 600. 00
- 72, 600. 00
DIVISION TOTAL - 72.600.00
8138 CIP 85-138 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
191, 400. 00
191, 400. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 191, 400. 00
8173 CIP 88-173 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8508 CIP 87-508
132, 000. 00
132, 000. 00
132.000. 00
514. 800. 00
DEPT: PARKS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES .
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE ti
0. 00 46. 35 2. 500. 00 116, 253. 65 • 2. 1
0. 00 46. 35 2. 500. 00 116, 253. 65 2. 1
0.00 46.35 2.500.00 116.253.65 2.1
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 72, 600. 00 0. 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 72.600.00 0.0
0.00 0.00 0.00 72,600.00 0.0
0. 00
0. 00
'O. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1,012.50
1, 012. 50
1, 012. 50
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 058. 85
0. 00 190, 387. 50 0. 5
0.00 ' 190, 387. 50 0.5
0.00 190.387.50 0.5
0.00 132.000.00 0.0
0.00 132.000.00 0.0
0. 00" 132, 000. 00 0. 0
• 2, 500. 00 511. 241. 15 0. 6
0.00 0.00 7.15 0.00 7.15- 0.0
0.00 0.00 7.15 0.00 7.15- 0.0
0.00 0.00
7.15 0.00 7. 15- • 0.0
r
P•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 PAGE 0040
DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X
r FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION
150 CROSSING GUARD FUND
r
8508 CIP 87-508 DEPT: PARKS
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 0.00
FUND TOTAL 514.800.00
0
•r-
r
r-
r-
1
1 •
f
0.00
0.00
7.15
1, 066. 00
0.00
2, 500. 00
7. 15-
511. 234. 00
0.0
0. 6
r
•-
I
0
r"
r..
•
R
r•
r
•
•
r
r
• ,.
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
155 CROSSING GUARD FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0041
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
• 58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE ti
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2102 CROSSING GUARD
4, 500. 00
4. 500. 00
4. 500. 00
4. 500. 00
DEPT: POLICE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4113 CROSSING GUARDS
4180 RETIREMENT
4187 UNIFORMS
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
11, 080. 00
267. 00
267. 00
36, 000. 00
1, 506. 00
1. 000. 00
780. 00
50, 900. 00
7, 700. 00
500. 00
8, 200. 00
59, 100. 00
59. 100. 00
63, 600. 00
375. 00
375. 00
375. 00
375. 00
917. 79
0. 00
0. 00
2. 290. 15
226. 65
0. 00
71. 36
3, 505. 95
O. 00
0. 00
0.00
3, 505. 95
3, 505. 95
3, 880. 95
2. 625. 00
2, 625. 00
2, 625. 00
2, 625. 00
6, 470. 03
0. 00
300. 39
13. 649. 79
1,218.38
14. 58
460. 74
22. 113. 91
2, 000. 00
0. 00
2, 000.00
24, 113. 91
24. 113. 91
26. 738. 91
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
393. 89
0.00
393. 89
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
393. 89
393. 89
393. 89.
1, 875. 00
1, 875. 00
1, 875. 00
1, 875. 00
58. 3
58. 3
58. 3
58. 3
4, 609. 97 58. 3
267.00 0.0
33. 39- 112. 5
22, 350. 21 37. 9
287. 62 80. 9
591. 53 40. 8
319. 26 59. 0
28, 392. 20 44. 2
5, 700. 00 25. 9
500. 00 0. 0
6, 200. 00 24. 3
34, 592. 20 41. 4
34, 592. 20 41. 4
36, 467. 20 42. 6
c
If
CITY 60 HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0042
• TIME 11:55:59 FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89 .�.
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
r' FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD•EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % ..
160 SEWER FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
r. 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER f
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 54. 529. 00 1, 987. 00 44, 591. 00 0. 00 9, 938. 00 81. 7
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 54, 529. 00 1, 987. 00 44, 591. 00 0. 00 9, 938. 00 • 81. 7
r
DIVISION TOTAL 54.529.00 1,987.00 44.591.00 0.00 9,938.00 81.7
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 54. 529. 00 1, 987. 00 44. 591. 00 0. 00 9, 938. 00 81. 7
• 3102 SEWER/ST DRAIN DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
• 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 86, 275. 00 6, 906. 24 46. 607. 32 O. 00 39, 667. 68 54. O
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
2, 500. 00 82. 25 338. 57 O. 00 2, 161. 43 13. 5
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 2,081. 00 0.00 • 446.37 0. 00 1.634.63 21. 4
• 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2.081.00 0.00 1. 119.46 0.00 961. 54 53.7
4180 RETIREMENT 12, 101. 00 830. 65 4, 840. 61 O. 00 7, 260. 39 40. 0
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -- - 7, 791. 00 538. 69 3, 535. 13 0. 00 4, 255. 87 45. 3
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 112, 829. 00 8, 357. 83 56, 887. 46 0. 00 55. 941. 54 50. 4
r
r
r
r
r
•
•
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4316 TRAINING
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5400 ASSETS (NON -CAPITALIZED)
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN *500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
2, 700. 00
2.700.00
5.400. 00
900. 00
8, 611. 00
1, 500. 00
1, 500. 00
150. 00
12, 661. 00
0. 00
989. 00
989. 00
9. 070. 00
9, 070. 00
140, 949. 00
0. 00
0.00 •
0. 00
72. 03
694. 87
61. 35
155. 64
0. 00
983. 89
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
748. 32
748. 32
10. 090. 04
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
423. 55
2, 937. 06
401. 54
648. 19
0. 00
4, 410. 34
435. 79
0. 00
435. 79
• 5. 986. 56
5, 986. 56
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
450. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
450. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
67.720.15 450.00
• 2. 700. 00
2. 700. 00
5, 400. 00
476. 45
5, 223. 94
1, 098. 46
851. 81
150. 00
7, 800. 66
435. 79-
989. 00
553. 21
3. 083. 44
3. 083. 44
0.0
0.0
0. 0
47. 0
39. 3
26. 7
43. 2
0. 0
38. 3
0. 0
0. 0
44. 0
66. 0
66. 0
72.778.85 48.3
r
r
r
•
1
r
•
•
r
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
160 SEWER FUND
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8404 CIP 85-404
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0043
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
•
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X
140, 949. 00 10, 090. 04
DEPT: SANITARY SEWER
0. 00
0. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 0.00
8405 CIP 86-405 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
1, 089, 000. 00
1. 089. 000. 00
0. 00
0. 00
DIVISION TOTAL - 1. 089, 000. 00
8406 CIP 88-406 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 484,000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 484,000.00
DIVISION TOTAL
0. 00
0. 00
67.720.15 450.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
14.462. 88
14.462.88 .
0. 00
0. 00
14. 462. 88
0. 00
0. 00
484, 000. 00 0. 00
8407 CIP 88-407 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 50.000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 50, 000. 00
15, 258. 88
15, 258. 88
57. 10
57. 10
15. 315. 98
1, 304. 00
1, 304. 00
1. 304. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
72, 778. 85 48. 3
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 •
1, 073. 741. 12
1. 073, 741. 12
57. 10-
57. 10-
0. 00 1.073, 684. 02
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
482, 696. 00
482, 696. 00
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
1. 4
1. 4
0. 0
0. 0
1. 4
0. 2
0. 2
482.696.00 0.2
50, 000. 00
50, 000. 00
0. 0
0. 0
DIVISION TOTAL 50, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 50.000. 00 0. 0
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1, 623. 000. 00 14,462.88 16.619.98 0.00 1. 606. 380. 02 1.0
FUND TOTAL 1, 818. 478. 00 26, 539. 92 128, 931. 13 450. 00 1. 689, 096. 87 7. 1
A
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
r• FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND
r
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
DEPT:
r- 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
r
r
•
•
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2103 SPEC INVESTGTNS
DEPT:
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4322 UNCLASSIFIED
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
'CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPR IATION
MGMT/SUPPORT
66, 307. 00
66, 307. 00
66, 307. 00
66, 307. 00
POLICE
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
66, 307. 00
MONTHLY EXP
5, 525. 00
5, 525. 00
5, 525. 00
5, 525. 00
474. 00
474. 00
474. 00
474. 00
5, 999. 00
YTD EXPND.
38, 678. 00
38, 678. 00
38, 678. 00
38, 678. 00
1, 474. 00
1, 474. 00
1, 474. 00
1, 474. 00
40, 152. 00
PAGE 0044
DATE 02/15/89
58. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
27, 629. 00 , 58. 3
27, 629. 00 58. 3
27, 629. 00
27, 629. 00
1, 474. 00-
1, 474. 00-
1, 474. 00-
1, 474. 00-
26, 155. 00
58. 3
58. 3
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
60. 5
•
r
•
•
r•
r'
r•
•
•
•
r.
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND
2202 HYDRANT UPGRADE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0045
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD'EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X
DEPT: FIRE
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
109. 700. 00
109. 700. 00
109, 700. 00
109, 700. 00
109, 700. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
41, 982. 00
41, 982. 00
41, 982. 00
41, 982. 00
41, 982. 00
67, 718. 00
67,718.00
67, 718. 00
67, 718. 00
67, 718. 00
38. 2
38. 2
38. 2
38. 2
38. 2
0
014,
r
•
r
•
•
•
r
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
705 INSURANCE FUND
1209 LIABILITY INS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0046
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89 DATE 02/15/89
58. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4180 RETIREMENT
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
15. 889. 00
382. 00
382. 00
2, 434. 00
2, 444. 00
21, 531.00
475. 342. 00
475, 342. 00
500. 00
250. 00
200. 00
300. 00
30, 000. 00
31, 250. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 528.123.00
1210 AUTO/PROP/BONDS -- DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
1, 717. 81
0. 00
0. 00
131. 45
106. 72
1, 955. 98
25. 478. 75
25, 478. 75
0.18
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
6. 782. 31-
6, 782. 13-
7, 534. 41
0. 00
345. 06
628. 95
695. 39
9. 203. 81
250, 913. 75
250, 913. 75
157. 32
66. 00
186. 00
0. 00
24, 531. 73
24, 941. 05
20, 652. 60 285, 058. 61
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 39.025.00 0.00 14,814.45
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 39.025.00 0.00 14.814.45
DIVISION TOTAL 39. 025. 00 0. 00 14, 814. 45
1215 UNEMPLOYMENT DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
• 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4186 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 50.000.00 15.646. 10 28,247.23
• OBJECT SUBTOTAL 50.000.00 15.646. 10 • 28,247.23
A
DIVISION TOTAL • 50. 000. 00 15, 646. 10 28, 247. 23
1217 WORKERS COMP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
r
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 20.891. 00 1.717. 83 9, 137. 94
r•
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
8. 354. 59
382. 00
36. 94
1, 805. 05
1, 748. 61
12, 327. 19
0.00 224,428.25
0.00 224,428.25
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00-
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
342. 68
184. 00
14. 00
300. 00
5, 468. 27
6, 308. 95
47. 4
0. 0
90. 3
25. 8
28.4
42. 7
52. 7
52. 7
31. 4
26. 4
93. 0
0. 0
81. 7
79. 8
243.064.39 53.9
24, 210. 55
24, 210. 55
37. 9
37. 9
24, 210. 55 37. 9
21, 752. 77
21, 752. 77
21, 752. 77
56. 4
56. 4
56.4
0. 00 11, 753. 06 . 43. 7
a
4
r
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 11:55:59
f., FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
705 INSURANCE FUND
1217 WORKERS COMP
r
r
r
•
•
•
r
r
r
t..
r
•
•
A
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 01/01/89 TO 01/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4180 RETIREMENT
4182 WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR
4183 WORKERS COMP PRIOR YR
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL -
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4316 TRAINING
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1218 MEDICARE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
REPORT TOTALS
501. 00
501. 00
3. 042. 00
130. 000. 00
0. 00
3. 622. 00
158, 557. 00
36, 500. 00
36, 500. 00
200. 00
265. 00
465. 00
195, 522. 00
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
24, 000. 00
24, 000. 00
24, 000. 00
836, 670. 00
836, 670. 00
17, 767. 879. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
0. 00
131.45
31. 885. 41
0. 00
182. 96
33, 917. 65
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
33.917. 65
2, 080. 23
2, 080. 23
2, 080. 23
72, 296. 58
72, 296. 58
1, 229, 784. 23
•
. 0. 00
345. 06
853. 32
104, 675. 28
0. 00
1. 206. 32
116, 217. 92
31, 721. 00
31, 721. 00
45. 62
43. 99
89. 61
148. 028. 53
12,505.18'
12, 505. 18
12, 505. 18
488, 654. 00
488, 654. 00
7, 948, 003. 08
PAGE 0047
DATE 02/15/89
58. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
O. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
501. 00
155. 94
2. 188. b8
25, 324. 72
0. 00
2, 415. 68
42, 339. 08
4, 779. 00
4, 779. 00
154. 38
221. 01
375. 39
0. 0
68. 8
28. 0
80. 5
0. 0
33. 3
73. 2
86. 9
86. 9
22. 8
16. 6
19. 2
47,493.47 75.7
0. 00 11, 494. 82
• 0. 00 11, 494. 82
0. 00 11, 494. 82
0. 00 348, 016. 00
0. 00 348, 016. 00
152, 613. 05 9, 667, 262. 87
52. 1
52. 1
52. 1
58. 4
58. 4
45. 5
Honorable Mayor
and Members of the
City Council
March 1, 1989
City Council Meeting
of Marcy 14, 1989
MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE
PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH
Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the
month of February 1989.
Respectfully submitted,
Gary :rutsch
City Treasurer
NOTED:
Kevin Northcraft
City Manager
to
INSTITUTION
LAIF
TOTAL
INVESTMENT REPORT - FEBRUARY 1989
DATE OF INVESTMENT
DATE OF MATURITY
INTEREST
BALANCE 2/01/89
Withdrawal
Investment
Withdrawal
Investment
Investment
Balance 2/28/89
$3,270,000.00
(100,000.00)
250,000.00
(600,000.00)
250,000.00
300,000.00
$3,370,000.00
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT:
Columbia S&L
Investment
Western Federal
Investment
Union Federal S&L
Investment
Union Federal S&L
Investment
Community Bank
Investment
Community Bank
Investment
$ 99,000.00
$ 400,000.00
$ 500,000.00
$ 500,000.00
$ 500,000.00
$ 500,000.00
2/8/89
2/22/89
2/27/89
3/7/88
3/31/88
9/22/88
10/27/88
12/8/88
1/26/89
2/1/89
2/16/89
3/2/89
3/17/89
9/22/89
10/1/89
12/8/89
7/25/89
8.45%
7.40%
7.75%
8.50%
8.40%
9.00%
9.15%
CORPORATE NOTES:
Ford Motor Credit Co.
Investment
Merrill Lynch & Co.
Investment
Summit Bancorporation
Investment
$ 500,000.00
$ 500,000.00
$ 500,000.00
BANKERS ACCEPTANCES:
Marine Midland
Investment $ 489,829.72
U.S. TREASURY NOTE:
Investment $ 500,937.94
FHLMC:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
Investment
Investment
TOTAL BALANCE
$ 248,733.64
$ 249,320.88
Respectfully Submitted,
$8,857,822.18
Gary : utsch e-�� Wa
City Treasurer
5/19/88
6/30/88
9/15/88
1/18/89
2/22/89
3/26/87
5/26/87
5/20/93
1/2/90
10/16/89
4/10/89
1/31/91
3/1/17
8/2/16
February 27, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council • March 14, 1989
TRAFFIC CONTROLS -SIXTH STREET AT LOMA DRIVE
Background:
It is recommended that City Council adopt Resolution No. 89 -
approving the installation of stop controls on Sixth Street at
Loma Drive to create a four way stop.
Background:
The City Traffic Engineer has field reviewed the subject
intersection as part of the ongoing project of traffic
surveillance in Hermosa Beach.
Analysis:
Eastbound and westbound Sixth Street do not align with each other
on the opposite sides of Loma Drive.
'The existing centerline stripe directs eastbound traffic head on
into westbound traffic.
The width of Sixth Street does not allow a restriping of the
street to eliminate the offset.
Sight distance for traffic on Sixth Street is severly restricted
at Loma Drive in the westbound direction due to a steep upgrade.
There has not been a history of right angle nor head on accidents
at this location, in part due to the low traffic volume levels.
Installation of a four way stop would be desirable to reduce the
potential for these accidents.
Fiscal Impact:
No additional appropriation is necessary as work can be done with
City forces within formerly budgeted accounts.
RespcStful emitted,
Edward J.
City Traffic Engineer
Attachment: Resolution No. 89-
tc/pwadmin
Concur:
•
(4'. .
Ant ony Antich
Director o Pu•lic Works
'Kevin B. Northctaft
City Manager
1f
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 88-5185, BY AMENDING THERETO A
STOP INTERSECTION ON SIXTH STREET ENTRANCE TO LOMA DRIVE
EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND AS HEREIN SET FORTH.
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to create a 4 -way stop
intersection at Sixth Street and Loma Drive,
WHEREAS, there presently exists a two-way stop northbound and
southbound only, Loma Drive to Sixth Street.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Resolution No. 88-5185, as amended shall be
and is hereby further amended by adding the following stop
intersection.
SIXTH STREET: Entrance to intersection with Loma
Drive eastbound and westbound traffic
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 14th day of March 1989.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
, City Clerk
APPROVED AS T01FORM:
City Attorney
Hermosa Beach Police TEL No .213-37 2-'4500 Feb .22,89 14:32 P.01
t
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM
To: Anthony Antich, Director of Public Works
PROM: Ed Ruzak, City Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: Sixth Street at Loma Drive Traffic Controls
DATE: February 8, 1989
The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the subject intersection
in the field and has the following comments and findings:
• Sixth Street does not presently stop at Loma Drive. Loma
Drive is stop controlled upon entering Sixth Street.
- Eastbound and westbound Sixth Street are offset to each
other "do not align" at Loma Drive.
- The present center line striping directs an eastbound
vehicle head on into westbound traffic and vice versa.
-- Sight distance for traffic on sixth Street is severely
restricted at Loma Drive due to a steep upgrade in the westbound
direction. -
- The width of Sixth Street does not allow for restriping of
the center line to eliminate the offset and to guide traffic into
the proper path.
• A comparison of the stop sign warrants indicates that a
4 -way stop would be desirable to remediate the poor sight
conditions at this location. Having to stop all vehicles on
Sixth Street would provide less of a potential for right angle
accidents. In addition the the proposed stop sign installation,
it will be necessary to install stop -ahead signs on Sixth Street
to provide advance notice to drivers of the impending stop. From
a pavement marking standpoint, it will be necessary to stripe a
double yellow line for 100 feet east and west of Loma on Sixth
Street to also clearly define no passing on this sight restricted
intersection.
- It is believed that this improvement will reduce the
potential for traffic accidents.
er/pwadmin
w
February 27, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council March 14, 1989
RESOLUTION NO. 89- , ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR
THE FORMATION OF THE HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT
NO. 1989-1990
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
resolution ordering the preparation of a report for the formation
of the Hermosa Beach Street Lighting District No. 1989-1990.
Background:
At the February 9, 1988 meeting City Council approved an
agreement with Patrick N. Rossetti for the provision of continued
street lighting assessment engineering services. This agreement
is available for review in the Office of the City Clerk. The
street lighting district provides for the maintenance, operation
and installation of the City's lighting.
Analysis:
The street lighting district must be renewed annually in the same
fashion that was utilized in its creation. In approving the
attached resolution, the Council orders the preparation of a
report which will contain plans and specifications, costs and
estimated assessments for the street lighting district. This
report will then be submitted to the City Clerk for submittal to
the City Council at which time the City Council will review the
report.
Alternatives:
Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City
Council are:
1. Let the district lapse; thereby, causing a potential
estimated inceased General Fund obligation of $321,490.
2. Retain the district and modify the level of service.
Res
ctfully submitted,
4,kIUM141
Anthony Antich
Director of Pu•lic Works
Concur:
evin B. Northcraft
City Manager
Attachments: Resolution Ordering Preparation of Report
Project Schedule
lg
1
1
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
3 CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO PREPARE A
REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4,°CHAPTER 1, PART 2,
4 "LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972", BEING DEVISION 15,
STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE
5 INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHTING FIXTURES, APPURTENANCES AND
APPURTENANT WORK, AND THE MAINTENANCE THEREOF IN THE CITY OF
6 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1,
1989 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1990.
7
8
9
10
11
12
'13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT, 1989-1990
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach,
California, proposes to renew the assessment district pursuant to
the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15,
Part 2 of the Street and Highways Code of the State of
California; and
WHEREAS, the said assessment district shall include all
parcels of land within the said City and shall be designated as
the "HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1989-1990"; and
WHEREAS, it is proposed to install certain lighting fixtures
and appurtenances, and appurtenant work, as shown on Diagram and
Plan No. 1989-1990, as amended, each year as funds become
available and as the City Council and City Staff designate; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to furnish the energy and to
maintain the street lighting system.
•
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE'AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the Director of Public Works is hereby
ordered to prepare and file a report in accordance with Article
4, Chapter 1, Part 2, "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972",
being Division 15, Part 2, Streets and Highways Code of the State
t
1 of California, for the installation of certain street lighting
2 fixtures, appurtenances and appurtenant work and the maintenance
3 thereof for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1989 and ending
4 June 30, 1989 all set forth in this resolution.
5 SECTION 2. That a certified copy of this resolution be
6 presented to the said City Manager for his information and
7 guidance.
8 SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage
9 and adoption of this resolution, shall cause the same to be '
10 entered among the original resolutions of said City; and shall
11 make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records
12 of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the
13 minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted.
14
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED THIS day of March 1989.
15
16 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
17
ATTEST:
18
19
CITY CLERK
20
21 PPROVED AS • FORM:
22
23 II C= ATTORN
24
25
26 /
27 /
28 /
PROJECT SCHEDULE Street Lighting District
PROJECT NAME : No. 19$9-1990
ACCOUNT NUMBER :
105-401-2601
TASKS
Resolution ordering preparation
of report.
Report Preparation.
File report with City Clerk.
Resolution approving report and
Public Hearing.*
Public Hearing and
esolution confirming assessments:
1
LEGEND
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : s■ e ss ss s■
ACTUAL SCHEDULE
X : 100% COMPLETE
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
1 1 I
NINE
®®rias
1
III III
1---- -�
•
Forward assessment to Los Angeles 11511
.Csinty_IaxAs sessDI I 1 I I I I I I I I I I
1®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®® Ell Ell, EIS ®®®m®EMS
Project Administration.
* Public Hearing must be heard before June 30, 1989
r
February 27, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council March 14, 1989
RESOLUTION NO. 89- ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR
THE FORMATION OF A CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution
ordering the preparation of a report for the formation of a
Crossing Guards Maintenance District.
Background:
The crossing guards district provides for'the maintenance and
administration of the City's crossing guards program.
Analysis:
As in the case of the Lighting District, the Crossing Guards
District must be renewed annually in the same fashion that was
utilized in it's creation. In approving the attached resolution,
the Council authorizes the preparation of a report which will
contain plans and specifications, costs, locations of crossing
guards, and estimated assessments for the Crossing Guards
District. This report will then be submitted to the City Clerk
for submittal to the City Council at which time the City Council
will review the report.
Alternatives:
Other alternatives available to City Council and considered by
staff are:
1. Let the district lapse; thereby causing a potential estimated
increased General Fund obligation of $58,600 for budget
amount crossing gaurds.
2. Retain district and modify level of service.
Respectfully submitted,
Concur:
Ant tb Antich � v evin B. Northcraft
Director of Publ c Works
City Manager
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Preparation of Report
Project Schedule
cc: Joan Noon, Director of General Services
ty/cgmd
lh
1
2
3
4
5
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO PREPARE A
REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2, CHAPTER 3.5, TITLE 5, OF
"THE CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (ACT OF 1974)", BEING
DIVISION 2, OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
FOR THE FORMATION OF A CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT IN
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
COMMENCING JULY 1, 1989 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1990
6 HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1989-1990
7 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach,
8 California, proposes to establish a "Crossing Guards Maintenance
9 District" pursuant to Article 21, Chapter 3.5, Title 5, of the
10 Crossing Guards Maintenance District Act of 1974, being Division
11 2 of the Government Code of the State of California; and,
12 WHEREAS, the said assessment district shall include all
13 parcels of land within the said City and shall be designated as
14 the "HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
15 1989-1990; and
16 WHEREAS, it is proposed to establish A CROSSING GUARDS
17 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT as shown on Diagram and Plan No. 1989-1990,
18 and as amended each year as funds become available andas the
19 City Council and City staff designate; and
20 WHEREAS, it is necessary to furnish the Crossing Guards
21 Maintenance District services for the said City.
22 NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
23 CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
24 SECTION 1. That the Director of Public Works is hereby
25 ordered to prepare and file a report in accordance with Article
26 2, Chapter 3.5, Title 5, of "THE CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE
27 DISTRICT ACT OF 1974", being Division 2 of the Government Code o
2S the State of California, for the establishing and formation of a
1
2
3
4
5
G
i
8
9
10
11
12
'13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
"CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT" in the City of Hermosa
Beach, California, for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1989
and ending June 30, 1990.
SECTION 2. That a certified copy of this resolution be
presented to the said Director of Public Works for his formation
and guidance.
SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this resolution, shall cause the same to be
entered emong the original resolutions of said City; and'shall
make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records
of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the
minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED APPROVED and ADOPTED
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
, CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
24
ly
25
20
2i
98
1.
PROJECT SCHEDULE Crossing Guard Maintenance
PROJECT NAME : District No. 1989-1990
ACCOUNT NUMBER : 155-401-2102
TASKS
Resolution ordering preparation
of_rna is
Report Preparation.
LEGEND
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : MAW= o M
ACTUAL SCHEDULE
X : 100% COMPLETE
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
■a■
e®0®o
File report with City Clerk. 0 e
! I
Resolution approving report and IIIIIII
Public Hearing_ *I® ®'I-• ----1
Public Hearing and
iResQlutisn confirming_ assessments. I I I
Forward assessment to Los Angeles MOM
County Tax Assessor. I ! I I I I
Project Administration INiel Ella 0ElElEl Ill ®®" III ® Ell ®MI®®®®® Ell ®®CIS® III CI®
! I 1 ! I I I 1 1 1 1 !'
4.
* Public Hearing must be heard before June 30, 1989
1
March 1, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the City Council March 1L, 1989
SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC LEASE AGREEMENT
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by staff that the City Council approve the
attached lease agreement with the South Bay Free Clinic.
BACKGROUND
The Free Clinic has been leasing office space in the Community
Center since December, 1981.
ANALYSIS
The attached lease conforms to the present square footage rental
policy and all other conditions of the former lease remain the
same.
Concur:
Alana Mastrian-Handman
Director
Dept. of Community -Resources
l-
Kevin
Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
1
Respectfully submitted,
22Af-pii. �1�z
Marsha Ernst
Administrative Aide
Dept. of Community Resources
1j
ti
HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT
This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the
Fourteenth day of March
19 89 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal
Corporation (City) and SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC (Lessee).
A. RECITALS:
1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service
facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com-
munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility").
2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed
restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February
1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School
District and is further subject to certain provisions
imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop-
ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for
Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th
day of February 1978. These documents are on file in
the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public
documents and by reference are incorporated into this
leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD
and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS.
3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on
the terms and conditions set out herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period
of 12 MONTHS commencing on the 1st day
of April ,1989 , and ending on the
31st day of March ,19 90 .
2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from
the City that portion of the facility described as:
ROOM 9 (419 SQ. FT . )
3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac-
cording to the following schedule:
April 1 1989 to June 30, 1989, $293 mo. Room 9
July 1, 1989 to Mar. 31, 1990, $310 mo. Room 9
Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease
commences on a day other than the first day of the
month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement
of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the
remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay-
ment on the first day of the following month.
3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi-
tions are agreed to by the Lessee:
1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls,
ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's
written consent.
2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained
upon or attached to the outside of the premises except
such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such
signs shall be in accordance with the policy established
by the Lessor.
4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the
following purpose: TEEN ADVOCATE CENTER
And for no other purpose without the express written consent
of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be
used in violation of the Depratment of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those
agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa
Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and
Urban Development.
5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at
all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive
General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee
in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to
any person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any
one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com-
bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name
City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected
officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional
insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the
sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must
include the coverage and provisions indicated.
Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of
insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times
during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to
be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and
should state clearly:
(1) The additional insured requested;
(2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation
to the City of Hermosa Beach;
(3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional
Insured;
(4) Coverage included;
(5) Cross -liability clause.
WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and
maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work-
er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur-
nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of
such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or
materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written
notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach.
INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated
(B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide.
6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE.
Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con-
dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon
termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les-
see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or
alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear
and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de-
mand the reasonable sums to. repair the premises in the event
of a violation of this provision.
7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al-
terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the
premises without the expressed written approval of the City.
Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the
City from potential liens of labor and material persons.
8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR
BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City
has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the
event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises.
The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem-
ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and
effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during
said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc-
tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to
the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes
intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion
determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then
either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi-
nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each
other.
9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee promises to hold the City harmless
from any claims, causes of actions or damages of any nature
whatever arising from Lessee's use of the premises and will
pay the City any monies to which the City may become obli-
gated because of Lessee's use of the premises. Lessee shall,
if so instructed by the City, cause any occupants of the
premises to execute a document in a form prepared by the City
wherein that occupant shall expressly waive any right of ac-
tion against the City for damages for any injury sustained
because of Lessee's use of the premises.
10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to
comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com-
munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City
Council.
11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any
and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any
governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises.
12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur-
suant to this lease within three days after written notice
from the City or to perform any other obligation required
pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after
notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease
to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue
all remedies available under the laws then existent in the
State of California.
13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur-
suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal-
ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States
mail, postage prepaid,
LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CITY HALL
1315 VALLEY DRIVE
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254
LESSEE: SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC
1807 Manhattan Beach Blvd.
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this
paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the
deposit thereof in the United States mail.
14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any
action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this
lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion
of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its
attorneys fees.
15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or
sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ-
ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de-
nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City.
16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is
binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of
the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa
Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on
the day first hereinabove set forth.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a
Municipal Corporation, Lessor
By
ATTEST:
ITY ATTORNEY
5
LESSEE:
March 1, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the City Council March 14, 1989
SALVATION ARMY LEASE AGREEMENT
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by staff that the City Council approve the
attached lease agreement with the Salvation Army.
BACKGROUND
The Salvation Army has been leasing Room 3 in the Community
Center for three years.
ANALYSIS
The attached lease conforms to the present square footage rental
policy and all other conditions of the former lease remain the
same.
Respectfully submi3ed,
Mardha Ernst
Administrative Aide
Dept. of Community Resources
Concur:
764.4L__
Alana Mastrian-Handman
Director
Dept. of Community Resources
/
Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
11(
4
HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT
This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the
Fourteenth day of March
1989 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal
Corporation (City) and The Salvation Army (Lessee).
A. RECITALS:
1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service
facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com-
munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility").
2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed
restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February
1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School
District and is further subject to certain provisions
imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop-
ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for
Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th
day of February 1978. These documents are on file in
the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public
documents and by reference are incorporated into this
leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD
and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS.
3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on
the terms and conditions set out herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period
of one (1) year commencing on the 1st day
of April ,1989 , and ending on the
31st day of March ,1990
2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from
the City that portion of the facility described as:
Room 3 (529 sq. ft.)
3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac-
cording to the following schedule:
April 1, 1989 through June 30, 1989, $370 mo.
$.70 sq. ft.
July 1, 1989 through March 31, 1990, $391 mo.
$.74 sq. ft.
Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease
commences on a day other than the first day of the
month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement
of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the
remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay-
ment on the first day of the following month.
3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi-
tions are agreed to by the Lessee:
1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls,
ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's
written consent.
2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained
upon or attached to the outside of the premises except
such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such
signs shall be in accordance with the policy established
by the Lessor.
4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the
following purpose or purposes: Counseling services of the
Salvation Army
And for no other purpose without the express written consent
of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be
used in violation of the Depratment of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those
agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa
Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and
Urban Development.
5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at
all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive
General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee
in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to
any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any
one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com-
bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name
City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected
officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional
insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the
sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must
include the coverage and provisions indicated.
Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of
insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times
during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to
be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and
should state clearly:
(1) The additional insured requested;
(2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation
to the City of Hermosa Beach;
(3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional
Insured;
(4) Coverage included;
(5) Cross -liability clause.
WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and
maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work-
er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur-
nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of
such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or
materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written
notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach.
INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated
(B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide.
6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE.
Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con-
dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon
termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les-
see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or
alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear
and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de-
mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event
of a violation of this provision.
7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al-
terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the
premises without the expressed written approval of the City.
Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the
City from potential liens of labor and material persons.
8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR
BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City
has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the
event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises.
The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem-
ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and
effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during
said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc-
tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to
the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes
intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion
determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then
either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi-
nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each
other.
9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee promises to hold the City harmless
from any claims, causes of actions or damages of any nature
whatever arising from Lessee's use of the premises and will
pay the City any monies to which the City may become obli-
gated because of Lessee's use of the premises. Lessee shall,
if so instructed by the City, cause any occupants of the
premises to execute a document in a form prepared by the City
wherein that occupant shall expressly waive any right of ac-
tion against the City for damages for any injury sustained
because of Lessee's use of the premises.
10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to
comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com-
munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City
Council.
11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any
and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any
governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises.
12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur-
suant to this lease within three days after written notice
from the City or to perform any other obligation required
pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after
notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease
to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue
all remedies 'available under the laws then existent in the
State of California.
13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur-
suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal-
ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States
mail, postage prepaid,
LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CITY HALL
1315 VALLEY DRIVE
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254
LESSEE: The Salvation Army
The Zahn Memorial Center for
Social Services
832 West Ninth STreet
Los Angeles, California 90015
(213) 627-0725
Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this
paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the
deposit thereof in the United States mail.
14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any
action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this
lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion
of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its
attorneys fees.
15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or
sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ-
ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de-
nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City.
16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is
binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of
the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa
Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on
the day first hereinabove set forth.
ATTEST:
PROVED AS _0 FORM:
ATE:
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a
Municipal Corporation, Lessor
By
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
LESSEE:
February 27, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the City Council of March 14, 1989
PROSPECT SCHOOL UPDATE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended the City Council receive and file this report.
BACKGROUND
At the Jan. 10, 1989, Council meeting the City Council directed
the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission
to determine how to restore the old Prospect School utilizing
volunteer services; establishing costs; determining scope of
project; and estimating time frames.
ANALYSIS
The Commission has discussed this subject at their January and
February meetings respectively. A Task Force was formed at the
February meeting consisting of two Commissioners, one member of
the Historical Society, one local architect - Jerry Compton (who
volunteered his services), and one neighbor -at -large. Dept.
staff will serve as liaison. The first meeting of the Task Force
will be held on March 14th at the Community Center. The Task
Force will report to the Commission and in turn the Commission
will keep the City Council updated.
Concur:
71/
Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
1
Respectfully submitted,
atte,
Alana Mastrian-Handman
Director
Dept. of Community Resources
11
March 7, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting
the Hermosa Beach City Council of March 14, 1989
RECOMMENDATION TO INSURE HIGH VALUE EMERGENCY VEHICLES WITH THE
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC ENTITY MOBILE EQUIPMENT PROGRAM
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council ratify providing coverage
for Fire Safety Vehicles through the California Public Entity
Mobile Equipment Program.
Background:
On December 19, 1988, the City Council approved continuing the
City's vehicle damage insurance coverage with Fireman's Fund In-
surance Company. At that time the City also made the decision to
self -insure all vehicles with the exception of high-value
specialty vehicles (i.e. Sweepers, Fire Engines, etc.). Pre-
viously, the City insured all 1984 or newer vehicles in addition
to the high-value specialty vehicles.
The initial premium quotation for the desired insurance coverage
indicated a premium of approximately S14,600. Upon further re-
view by the underwriter, the premium was revised to S21,620.
That premium figure reflects a composite rate of S2,400 per vehi-
cle for the nine insured vehicles. The savings for insuring only
the high-value vehicles instead of all 1984 and newer was
S13,805.
In order to maintain the insurance without a lapse, coverage was
continued with Fireman's Fund. Additionally, staff continued to
explore alternatives for coverage. Through staffs research, the
California Public Entity Mobile Equipment Program (CPEMEP) was
discovered which provides vehicle damage coverage for high valued
emergency type vehicles.
Analysis:
Coverage has been bound with the CPEMEP for the City's two fire
engines and one ambulance at a cost of S2,973. This represents
an additional annual savings of S4,227 for vehicle physical
damage insurance.
Coverage for the Fire Department vehicles became effective March
2, 1989. A pro -rated premium adjustment has been requested from
the Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.
1 t
Staff is continuing to seek cost effective alternatives for pro-
viding coverage for the remaining high-value vehicles.
Respectfully submitted,
(ittALL11947-4 k
Robert A. Blackwood
Risk Manager
Noted for fiscal impact:
Viki Copeland
Finance Administrator
Concur:
Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
February 27, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City Council Meeting
of March 14, 1989
REQUEST OF THE KIWANIS CLUB FOR
CHRISTMAS TREE LOT ON COMMUNITY CENTER LAWN
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community
Resources Advisory Commission the City Council approve the
request of the Kiwanis Club for the operation of a Christmas Tree
Lot on the front lawn of the Community Center for the holidays of
1989.
BACKGROUND
A similar request was granted by the City Council for this past
holiday season. Attachment A reflects 1) the Council agenda item
of last year, 2) the wrap-up report from the Kiwanis Club for
this year's operation, 3) staff's wrap-up report to the City
Council for this year's project and 4) the Commission's agenda
item regarding this project for this coming year (1989).
ANALYSIS
The one change in the request for this year is the Kiwanis Club
would like to move the location a bit closer to PCH. This does
not present any problems from staff's perspective.
As staff has indicated to the Commission there may be a problem
in the future should any other local non-profit make the same
request of the City. That has not happened to date. If it
should occur in the future, staff suggests it be addressed at
that time.
However, in order to have a successful project, work must start
on a project of this magnitude now. Therefore, staff is also
recommending the Council approve this project for this year and
if another organization does make a similar request, that that be
addressed next year.
Previously staff has thought the organization of such a project
could begin in September of each year. However in discussions
with the Kiwanis Club and one other owner of a Christmas tree
lot, the work must begin almost immediately after the Christmas
season. Part of the reason is to secure a good price for the
trees.
A representative of the Kiwanis Club will be at the Council
meeting should there be any questions.
Concur:
/
792°'
eviri B. Northcr:aft
City Manager
Respectfully submitted,
Alana Mastrian-Harfdman
Director
Dept. of Community Resources
li
NOTE:
As a point of information, the Kiwanis Club has again agreed to
donate to the Community Center Foundation 10% of its net profits
or $1,000 whichever is greater.
This revenue to the Foundation is comparable to the Seaview
Property rental for the same activity with adjustments made for
1) over-all square footage and 2) a non-profit versus commercial
entity.
a00651%-.): J434 OZ -6
October 5, 1988
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
KIWANIS CHRISTMAS TREE SALE REQUEST
' Attachmerit A (1)
City Council Meeting o
October 11, 1988
RECOMMENDATION
The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory
Commission recommends City Council approves the request from the
Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club to conduct a Christmas Tree sale on
the south lawn of the Community Center.
BACKGROUND
The Kiwanis Club brought forth a request for this sale to the
Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission at
their Sept. 28th meeting.
Kiwanis projects to occupy the site from November 21, 1988
through January 1, 1989. The sale will be a fundraiser for the
Kiwanis Club and will also benefit Community Center Foundation's
Air Conditioning Fund. (The Kiwanis Club has agreed to donate
$1,000 or 107! of their net profits, whichever is higher, to the
Foundation's Air Conditioning Fund.)
ANALYSIS
The Commission agreed that the project should be approved on a
one year trial basis subject to the following conditions:
• The location of the trees shall be the southern most
triangle of the front lawn of the Community Center
(abutting llth Place);
• The area can be fenced in and lighted;
• Temporary signs can be installed on the front lawn
directly in front of the trees and between the marquee and
the designated site;
• Kiwanis will assume all costs for restoring the area back
to its original state, with the Public Works Department
approving all work; this may include other areas as the
sprinkler system will have to be turned off in that
particular area but it will affect other areas as well;
said work to be completed by January 15, 1989;
• Kiwanis will be allowed to have a camper on llth Place for
24 hour security purposes. Any lost revenue from the
meters will be borne by the Kiwanis Club;
• Kiwanis will pay to the City any other costs incurred by
the City with regard to this project;
- 1 -
Attachment A (1)
• Kiwanis may occupy the site from November 21, 1988 through
January 1, 1989;
•.t*ZiTkanis14.11:proyide7InSurandoT
• The approval will be for one year only with•a review
immediately following.
Concur:
even B. North, Oraf t
City Manager
2
Res•e_ m fitted,
Mary Director
Dept. of •mmunity Resources
Attachment A (2)
KIWANIS CLUB OF HERMOSA BEACH
H E R M O B A BEACH
CALIFORNIA
1-27-89
City of Hermosa Beach
Civil Center
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Dear Alana:
Enclosed is a financal break down of the christmas tree lot sale and
a day by day count of inventory and sales by unit.
For a first time event this fund raiser went very smothly, with
the one excpetion of the electrical system at the Community Center.
The System is old and.needs to be re -wired, not only for our event,
but any other event in the future.
We would like the City to conceder this event for next year.
But we would like to move the lot from the triangle on the front lawn
of the community center to directly east, across the sidewalk, the
most Southest part of the lawn.
We will present the $1,000. to the Community Center Foundation at
the February 14th Council meeting.
Thank you for all your help!
Sincerely,
Cary J. Bichlmeier
t.
Zvv‘d
44)7.7e a
0,e
a)
sz -e
ce,&
ca
(1) P- " i
6:.:7::-.-_Z•74) jed ,•47re. -g
‘') 4 ) `—✓ize_e a -
.
t92,
67) o/j ,
xief. ,;4-1
zz
049677 44:;
(r1/ 'sr) c
.?.� G'c
.?o . 6d ./
4? cc,
�G1 • C�
.X57. C6,
/3:.33
A
12'43 44;
Attachment A (2)
'lC
7' 7f: R)
1j8.7
A. -k
Attachment A (2)
.......i ___.....E7
_19 .
•
. . ,
..... . ./.2 ‘. ................. .........5 5.0 . .
..I.2 7 / 5-
•.....
....
ig./o _ 24 t.5 7...-.7 .____
......./ g n
...... •.*.• ••• ••••..114.261 ..
-....9/6 ..
_fa 13.....s-Ee ..... . 20
..... /2 ...... 17-z ..._ . ..2c
_._./. /.._____. ___.....6-7/.. ...... ...._. ..v/.......
ig ./..,.7_ .. SZ . .
.._..3Y‘ ...-.-- -- ._. .. ..._..
C- _ • •. •
• ....,;,z4i7.51
•
/.3 5/26 , 0
. . • . . .. •
•
• , • • . •
••
..• . • .
• •• • .• .
• .. •
•
•
' • . • .•
. • . •
. • • •
. • . . , . • . •
• . . •
• •
• .
•
• .
• .
•
• •
Attachment A (3)
January 31, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the City Council February 14, 1989
KIWANIS CLUB OF HERMOSA BEACH
CHRISTMAS TREE LOT REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended the City Council receive and file this report
and forward the request of the Kiwanis for next year's event to
the Park, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission
for action.
BACKGROUND
The attached Council report of October 11, 1988 reflects
Council's action for permitting the Kiwanis Club use of the
Community Center's front lawn for the purpose of selling
Christmas trees. At that time the Council also requested a wrap
up report from staff once the project was completed.
ANALYSIS
It appears for all concerned, the project sponsored by the
Kiwansis Club was a success. The main area of concern for staff
was the electrical hookup. We have always experienced electrical
problems at the Community Center. This added to the problem.
However the problem is being reviewed by the Public Works Dept.
and hopefully some of these problems will be mitigated in the
future.
Otner than that one area, the project ran smoothly from the
City's point of view. Kiwanis' contribution to the Foundation is
a glowing example of the cooperative spirit that is a part of
that organization.
Respectfully submitted,
Alana Mastrian-Handman
Director
Dept. of Community Resources
Concur
Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
le
iedraAtAfti
/d
Attachment A (4)
TO: Advisory Commission DATE: Feb. 16, 1989
RE: Kiwanis Club Request
FROM: Alana Mastrian—Handma
*****************************************************************
*****************************************************************
Page one of the attached is the wrap up report to the City
Council regarding the Kiwanis Club's use of the Community Center
front lawn for the sale of Christmas trees.
Page two of the attached is the Kiwanis Club's request for
consideration again of this project for next year. The only
difference is they would like to move the lot a little bit closer
to PCH. Staff has no.problem with this.
Recommendation: To approve this project for next year with the
same conditions and forward to the City Council for final
approval.
There is a possibility we may run into a problem with other
groups requesting this same opportunity. However, we have not
encountered this to date. What the Kiwanis Club is doing
requires an extraordinary amount of organization as well as a lot
of volunteer effort. Therefore staff feels the chances of
another local organization requesting this same opportunity is
somewhat nil. Staff feels it would be appropriate to grant this
request and to deal with that other matter if and when it occurs.
This could also be conveyed to the Kiwanis Club, that if another
organization makes this same request, before Sept. 1, 1989, the
Commission will have to reconsider the matter. Staff is using
the cut off date of Sept. 1 as that appears to be the length of
time needed to organize a project such as this.
240
March 1, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the City Council
March 14, 1989
APPROVAL OF CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE CDBG PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor to sign
the attached Agreement (Attachment A) with the Community
Development Commission of Los Angeles for the execution of the
Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG); and authorize
Mayor to sign addenda as necessary.
BACKGROUND
On July 26, 1988, the City Council approved an Agreement and
Resolution between the City and the Community Development
Commission for the City to participate in the CDBG Program
beginning July 1, 1989. Attachment B.
At the January 24, 1989, Council meeting, the City Council held a
Public Hearing and approved three programs to be funded through
the CDBG Program. Attachment C.
ANALYSIS
Before you this evening is the contract between the City and CDC
for the execution of the CDBG Program. The contract that was
approved by the Council on July 26 was an agreement to enter into
the program. This contract reflects the guidelines and details
of the program. This language is not contained in the earlier
agreement and therefore must be approved by the City Council. It
is important to note, that the City Council still has the
discretion to change any project that is being funded with CDBG
funds at any time during the life of the contract. Staff will be
returning to the Council within the next several weeks to discuss
the process for implementing the three programs that were
approved on January 24th.
Concur:
4' -1
Kevin B. Northcpaft
City Manager
Respectfully submitted,
Llllzr C zz . •la: dine t✓
Alana Mastrian-Handman
Assistant City Manager
lu
David N. Lund
Executive Director
February 10, 1989
Attachment A (1 of 5)
Community Development Commission
County of Los Angeles
1436 Goodrich Boulevard • Commerce, California • (213) 725-7422
Alana Mastrian
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Ms. Mastrian:
REQUEST FOR EXECUTION OF COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONTRACT
Commissioners
Peter F. Schabarum
Kenneth Hahn
Edmund D. Edelman
Deane Dana
Michael D. Antonovich
Enclosed for execution by your City's authorized signatory are four copies of a
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) contract for implementation of your City's
community development project(s).
Please return all four original signed copies of the contract to Jose Pulido of my
staff, at 1436 Goodrich Boulevard, Commerce, California 90022. If you anticipate
mailing the copies after March 1, 1989, please send to:
Community Development Commission
CDBG Division
2525 Corporate Center Place
Monterey Park, CA 91754
The contract must be returned, no later than March 31, 1989. Failure to meet this
deadline may result in delay of your Fifteenth Year (1989-90) CDBG projects.
Once the contract amendment has been fully executed, an original will be forwarded
to you. If there are any questions, please contact Lisa Lans, your Program Manager,
at (213) 725-7460 or Mr. Pulido at (213) 725-7463.
Sincerely,
BOBBETTE A. GLI E', Director
Community Devel••ment Block Grant Division
Enclosures
JP:lw/2a
r
1
Attachment A (2 of 5)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
REIMBURSABLE CONTRACT
WITH PARTICIPATING CITY
CONTRACT NUMBER:
THIS CONTRACT is made and entered into this first day of July 1989, by and between
the County of Los Angeles, hereinafter called the "County", and the City of Hermosa Beach,
hereinafter called the "Operating Agency".
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the County has entered into a Contract with the United States of America,
through its Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), to execute the County's
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program under the Housing and Community Develop-
ment Act of 1974, as amended, hereinafter called the "Act"; and
WHEREAS, Operating Agency desires to participate in said program.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein set forth and the
mutual benefits to be derived therefrom, the parties agree as follows:
1. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. The Executive Director of the Community Development
Commission of the County of Los Angeles (Commission), hereinafter called "County Project
Director", or his designee, shall have full authority to act for County in the Administra-
tion of this Contract consistent with the provisions contained herein.
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The Operating Agency is to perform services consistent with
the goals and objectives set forth in the Los Angeles Urban County Community Development
Block Grant Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for the Fifteenth Program
Year, as adopted by the County Board of Supervisors on May 25, 1989, or any amendment or
successor thereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference.
3. PROCEDURES TO IMPLEMENT. Operating Agency is eligible for reimbursement for a
project implemented under this Contract only after a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU),
accompanied by a detailed Project Description and Budget, is developed to the satisfaction
of the County Project Director, or his designee, and is executed by both the County Pro-
ject Director, or his designee, and the Operating Agency.
4. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. Said services of Operating Agency are to commence not
sooner than the date first written above, and shall be completed not later than June 30,
1991. Specific project start and completion dates shall be a part of the MOU procedure
described above for initiating the project(s).
5. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. Upon such performance under this Contract,
County shall reimburse Operating Agency an amount not to exceed $122,762, which shall con-
stitute full and complete reimbursement hereunder provided for the implementation of this
Contract. Said reimbursement will only be paid out of funds received by County from the
Federal Government under the Act for the Fiscal Years indicated in the MOU, or from
program income, as described in 24 CFR 570.506 and OMB Circular No. A-102, Attachment E,
accumulated under said program, for allowable costs actually incurred for the express pur-
poses specified. The parties understand and agree that such reimbursement, if any, shall
be conditioned upon receipt of said funds by the County from the Federal Government or ac-
cumulation of program income from said program, and shall not be a charge on any other
funds of the County. Further, such funds, if any, shall be paid only after development
and execution of the MOU(s) necessary to implement the project(s) covered by this Contract
and receipt and approval by County of a periodic detailed invoice in a form specified and
approved by the County Project Director, or his designee. Operating Agency shall bill for
expenditures on a monthly basis for all projects for which MOU's have been executed.
6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. All parties agree to be bound by all applicable federal,
state, and local laws, ordinances, regulations and directives as they pertain to the per-
formance of this Contract. This Contract is subject to and incorporates the terms of the
Act; 24 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 570, Chapter V; U.S. Office of Management and
Budget Circulars A-87 and A-102; Executive Order 12372; the County Auditor -Controller Con-
tract Accounting and Administration Handbook; and all successor laws, regulations or
guidelines thereto (the Laws, Regulations and Guidelines). The Operating Agency has, and
shall maintain, copies of the Laws, Regulations and Guidelines. Furthermore, the Operat-
ing Agency acknowledges that it has read and understands the Laws, Regulations and
Guidelines.
1
Attachment A (3 of 5)
y
7. REVENUE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT. Operating Agency shall make.available for in-
spection and audit to County's representatives, upon request, at any time during the dura-
tion of this Contract, and during a period of five (5) years thereafter, all of its books
and records relating to the operation by it of each project or business activity which is
funded in whole or in part with federal or state grant monies, including the project(s)
funded under this Contract, whether or not such monies are received through County. All
such books and records shall be maintained by Operating Agency at a location in Los
Angeles County. Failure of Operating Agency,to comply with the requirements of this Sec-
tion 7 shall constitute a material breach of contract upon which County may cancel, ter-
minate or suspend this Contract.
8. PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW. Operating Agency shall allow County authorized
personnel to inspect and monitor its facilities and program operations, including the in-
terview of Operating Agency staff and program participants, as required by the County.
9. REPORTS AND RECORDS. Operating Agency agrees to prepare and submit all HUD
required reports and any financial, program progress, monitoring, evaluation or other
reports required by County or its representatives. Operating Agency shall ensure that its
employees, agents, City Council members, officers, and board members furnish such informa-
tion which, in the judgment of County representatives, may be relevant to a question of
compliance with contractual conditions, with County or HUD directives, or with the effec-
tiveness, legality and achievements of the CDBG Program.
10. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. Operating Agency shall comply with specific project im-
plementation and expenditure standards as adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the
County.
11. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. The Operating Agency shall make every effort to ensure that
all projects funded wholly or in part by CDBG funds shall provide equal employment and
career advancement opportunities for minorities and women. In addition, the Operating
Agency shall make every effort to employ residents of the project area(s) specified in the
MOU(s).
12. DISCRIMINATION. No person shall, on the grounds of race, sex, creed, color,
religion, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be refused the benefits
of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination in any activities, program or employment
supported by this Contract.
13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. The Operating Agency, its agents and employees shall
comply with all applicable federal, state and county laws and regulations governing con-
flict of interest.
14. FISCAL LIMITATIONS. The United States of America, through HUD, may in the fu-
ture place programmatic or fiscal limitations on CDBG funds not presently anticipated.
Accordingly,' the County reserves the right to revise this Contract in order to take into
account actions affecting HUD program funding. In the event of funding reduction, the
County may reduce the budget of this Contract, as a whole or may limit the rate of the
Operating Agency's use of both its uncommitted and its unspent funds. Where HUD has
directed or requested the County to implement a reduction in funding, in whole or as to a
cost category, with respect to funding for this Contract, the County Project Director, or
his designee, may act for the County in implementing and effecting such a reduction and in
revising the Contract for such purpose. Where the County Project Director, or his
designee, has reasonable grounds to question the fiscal accountability, financial sound-
ness, or compliance with this Contract of the Operating Agency, County Project Director,
or his designee, may act for the County in suspending the operation of this Contract for
up to sixty (60) days, upon three (3) days notice to Operating Agency of his intention to
so act, pending an audit or other resolution of such questions. In no event, however,
shall any revisions made by the County affect expenditures and legally binding commitments
made by the Operating Agency before it received notice of such revision, provided that
such amounts have been committed in good faith and are otherwise allowable, and that such
commitments are consistent with HUD cash withdrawal guidelines.
15. INDq'1NIFICATION. The Operating Agency agrees to indemnify, defend and save
harmless County, its agents, officers and employees from and against any and all liabil-
ity expense, including defense costs and legal fees, and claims for damages of any nature
whatsoever, including, but not limited to, bodily injury, death, personal injury, or
property damage arising from or connected with the Operating Agency's operations, or its
services hereunder, including any workers' compensation suits, liability or expense aris-
ing from or connected with services performed on behalf of Operating Agency by any person
pursuant to this Contract.
16. AUDIT EXCEPTIONS BY STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES. Operating Agency agrees that in
the event the program established hereunder is subjected to audit, monitoring or other ex-
ception3 by appropriate state and federal agencies, it shall be responsible for complying
Attachment A (4 of 5)
1
with such exceptions and paying the County the full amount of County's liability to the
funding agency resulting from such audit exceptions.
17. INSURANCE. Without limiting Operating Agency's indemnification of County and
Commission, the Operating Agency shall provide and maintain at its own expense during the
term of this Contract a program of insurance satisfactory to the County's Risk Manager
covering its operations hereunder. The details of said program of insurance shall be
specifically cited within the MOU for each project covered by this Contract. Satisfaction
of the terms of this Section 17 by the Operating Agency shall be precedent to payment as
well as the initiation of services under this Contract.
18. TERMINATION AND TERMINATION COSTS. This Contract may be terminated at any time
by either party upon giving thirty (30) days notice in writing to the other party. County
Project Director, or his designee, is hereby empowered to give said notice subject to
ratification by the County Board of Supervisors. County may immediately terminate this
Contract upon the termination, suspension, discontinuation or substantial reduction in
CDBG funding for the Contract activity or if, for any reason, the timely completion of the
work under this Contract is rendered improbable, infeasible or impossible. In such event,
Operating Agency shall be compensated for all services rendered and all necessarily in-
curred costs performed in good faith, in accordance with the terms of this Contract, that
have not been previously reimbursed, to the date of said termination, to the extent CDBG
funds are available.
19. PROGRAM INCOME. Upon termination of this Contract, the County reserves the
right to determine the final disposition of any program income, as described in 24 CFR 570
and OMB Circular No. A-102. Said disposition may include the County taking possession of
said program income. The Operating Agency shall submit monthly reports to the County
specifying program income earned.
20. TIME OF PERFORMANCE MODIFICATIONS. The County Project Director, or his desig-
nee, may grant time of performance modifications to this Contract when such modifications
are:
a. In the best interest of the County and Operating Agency in performing
the scope of services under this Contract;
b. In increments not to exceed twelve months and in aggregate do not
exceed thirty-six (36) calendar months; and
c. Approved by the County Project Director, or his designee, prior to
expenditures being made.
21. JOINT FUNDING. For projects in which there are sources of funds in addition to
CDBG funds, Operating Agency shall provide proof of such funding upon request. The County
shall not pay.for any services provided by Operating Agency which are funded by other
sources. All restrictions and/or requirements provided for in this Contract, relative to
accounting, budgeting and reporting, apply to the total project regardless of funding
source.
22. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Both parties hereto in the performance of this Contract
will be acting in an independent capacity and not as agents, employees, partners, joint
venturers or associates of one another. The employees or agents of one party shall not be
deemed or construed to be the agents or employees of the other party for any purpose what-
soever, including workers' compensation liability. Operating Agency shall bear the sole
responsibility and liability for furnishing workers' compensation benefits to any person
for injuries arising from or connected with services performed on behalf of the Operating
Agency pursuant to this Contract.
23. USE OF FUNDS. All funds approved under this Contract shall be used solely for
costs approved in the project budget(s) for the MOU(s) under this Contract. Contract
funds shall not be used as a cash advancement between contracts, as security to guarantee
payments for any nonprogram obligations, or as loans for nonprogram activities. Separate
financial records shall be kept for each funding source.
24. ASSIGNMENT. This Contract is not assignable by Operating Agency. Any attempt
by Operating Agency to assign any performance of the terms of this Contract shall be null
and void and shall constitute a material breach of this Contract.
25. AMENDMENTS: VARIATIONS. This writing embodies the whole of the agreement of
the parties hereto. There are no oral agreements not contained herein. Except as herein
provided, addition to or variation of the terms of this Contract shall not be valid unless
made in the form of a written amendment of this Contract formally approved and executed by
both parties.
3
Attachment A ( 5 of 5)
26. NOTICES. All notices given under this Contract shall be served in writing. The
notices to the Operating Agency shall be sent to the following address:
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Notices, reports and statements to the County shall be delivered or sent to the County
Project Director or his designee, Community Development Commission of the County of Los
Angeles, 1436 Goodrich Boulevard, Commerce, California 90022.
Each party shall promptly notify the other party of any change(s) of address to which
notices shall be sent pursuant to this Contract.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles has caused
this Contract to be subscribed by its Chairman and the seal of said Board to be hereto af-
fixed, and attested by the Executive Officer -Clerk of the Board of Supervisors thereof,
and the Operating Agency has subscribed the same through its authorized officer, the day,
month and year first above written.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:
LARRY J. MONTEILH
Executive Officer -
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DE WITT W. CLINTON
County Counsel
By
Deputy
APPROVED AS TO PROGRAM:
DAVID N. LUND, Executive Director
Community Development Commission
of the County of Los Angeles
By
Director, CDBG
4
By
Operating Agency
Title
ATTEST:
City Clerk
By
Attachment B •(1 of 5)
, 4.1;
CGQ k
July 20, 1988
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the City Council July 26, 1988
APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION APPROVING A COOPERATION AGREEMENT'BETWEEN
LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FOR PARTICIPATION IN
THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended City Council approve 1) the attached resolution
approving a Cooperation Agreement between Los Angeles County and
the City of Hermosa Beach for participation in the Community
Development Block Grant Program;.2) approve the hiring of a
consultant to prepare the project application papers and
eventually administer the program.
BACKGROUND
The City of Hermosa Beach has participated in the Block Grant
Program in the past. On September 22, 1987 the then City Council
decided not to.continue to participate in the program once the
existing contract was concluded. The main reason for the
decision not to participate was the lack of in-house staff to
oversee the program and the difficulty the City was encountering
with LA County with regard to the CDBG Program.
ANALYSIS
The County contacted the City two weeks ago and indicated they
were extending the City (and other cities) an opportunity .to join
the program again even though the three year cycle had already
begun. 'By joining now the City could participate in the last two
years of this present three year program. Funding would not be
available until July, 1989.
We have been advised there are two programs in which the City can
participate: 1) senior citizen and low/moderate income housing
rehab program; or 2) the economic development program. Staff is
recommending at this time the first program, that of housing
rehab.
The recommendation also includes the City Council approving a
consultant to be hired for the purpose of administering the
program. Initially, the consultant fees will be paid through the
general fund of the City. It is at this time the consultant will
prepare the necessary application papers for approval of the
first project the City undertakes. Once the City is in the
program, 10% of the total amount of grant funds approved can be
used for administration purposes. Staff will return to the City
Council for final approval of a consultant which will include a
contract and a specified dollar amount. Should City Council
2
Attachment B (2 of 5)
decide not to approve a consultant for the purposes listed above,
staff recommends not participating in the CDBG program. Present
in-house staff is not capable of taking on this project.
Presently, staff is not sure of the allocation the City may be
able to receive in this program. Based on previous year's
allocations, it may be around $100,000.
The Housing Rehab Program that staff is recommending the City
Council approve, can be designed per the wishes of the City
Council. The various options available to the City Council will
be presented at a later date, once the Council approves re-entry
into the Program. --
Staff has contacted the cities of Manhattan Beach and Redondo
Beach to determine their use of CDBG funds. The City of
Manhattan Beach uses CDBG funds for senior citizen housing
rehabilitation and contributions to 1736 Projects and the Free
Clinic. The City of Redondo Beach uses its funds for a variety
of programs. Redondo Beach has many more options for use of CDBG
funds due to the diverse make Up of that City. Manhattan Beach
and Hermosa Beach are not that diverse and are very limited in
how CDBG funds can be used.
. Respectfully submitted,
Alana M. Mastrian
Assistant City Manager
Concur:
'Kevin B. Nort_ncraft
City Manager
David N. Lund
Executive Director
Attachment B (3 of 5)
Community Development Commission
County of Los Angeles
1436 Goodrich Boulevard •Commerce. California 90022.1213) 725.7422
August 15, 1988
Alana M. Mastrian
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
Dear Ms. Mastrian:
EXECUTED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT COOPERATION AGREEMENT
Commissioners
Deane Dana
Chairman
Peter F. Schabarum
Kenneth Hahn
Edmund D. Edelman
Michael D. Antonovich
Enclosed for your files is a fully executed Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) Cooperation Agreement between your City and
the County of Los Angeles for the funding 'period from July 1,
1989 through June 30, 1991.
If there are any questions regarding the agreement, please con-
tact Hal Cooper of my staff at (213) 725-7463.
Sincerely,
BOBBETTE A. VER, Director
Community De elopment Block Grant Division
HC:cr/L-6
Enclosure
Attachment B (4 of 5)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
PARTICIPATING CITY
COOPERATION AGREEMENT
4 0 ()I. 8
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this l day of 4‘)CklitS-\--
1988, by
and between the City of Hermosa Beach , Hereinafter ref ed to as "City",
and the County of Los Angeles, hereinafter referred to as the "County".
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, County and City desire to cooperate to undertake, or assist in undertaking,
community renewal and lower income housing 'assistance activities, specifically urban
renewal and publicly assisted housing, including, but not limited to, the improvement or
development of•housing for persons of low to moderate incomes and other community or urban
renewal activities authorized by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as
amended, hereinafter referred to as the "Act"; and
WHEREAS, County Counsel has determined that the terms and provisions of this agree-
ment are fully authorized under State and local law, and that this agreement provides full
legal authority for the County to undertake, or assist in undertaking, essential community
development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly as-
sisted housing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. The City and the County agree to cooperate to undertake, or assist in undertak-
ing, community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities, specifically urban
renewal and publicly assisted housing, including, but not limited to, the improvement or
development of housing for persons of low to moderate incomes and other community or urban
renewal activities authorized by the Act.
2. The City hereby authorizes the County to perform, or cause to be performed,
those acts necessary to implement the community or urban renewal and lower income housing
activities specified for the City in the County's annual Statements of Community Develop-
ment Objectives which will be funded from annual Community Development Block Grants from
Federal Fiscal Years 1989 and 1990 appropriations and from any program income generated
from the expenditure of such funds. County shall have final responsibility for selecting
projects and annually filing Final Statements of Community Development Objectives.
3. The City and the County shall take all actions necessary to assure compliance
with the County's certification required by Section 104(b) of Title I of the Act, the
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, Section 109 of Title I of the
Act, Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, and other applicable
laws.
4. The City shall inform the County of any income generated by the expenditure of
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds received by the City. Any such program in-
come may be retained by the City subject to the requirements of this agreement. Such
program income may only be used for eligible activities in accordance with all CDBG
requirements as .may then apply.
5. The County shall be responsible for monitoring and reporting to HUD on the use
of any program income; therefore, the City shall be required to maintain appropriate
recordkeeping and reporting for this purpose.
6. In the event of close-out or change in status of the City, any program income
that is on hand or received subsequent to the close-out or change in status shall be paid
to the County.
7. All/program income generated from the disposition or transfer of real property
acquired or improved by the City, using CDBG funds or program income, during the term of
this agreement, shall be treated as described in Sections 4 through 6 of this agreement.
8. Any real property which is acquired or improved by the City during the term of
this agreement, in whole or in part, using CDBG funds or program income, shall be subject
to the following standards:
a. The County shall be notified by the City in writing of any modification or
change in the use or disposition of such real property from that planned at the time
of acquisition or imprwement. Such notification shall be made prior to the
modification or change in use or disposition.
1
Attachment B (5 of 5)
b. If such real property is ever sold or transferred for a use which does not
qualify as an eligible use under CDBG regulations, the City shall reimburse to the
County an amount equal to the current fair market value of the property less any
portion thereofattributable to expenditures of non-CDBG funds.
9. The City. shall make available for inspection and audit to County's repre-
sentatives, upon request, at any time during the duration of this agreement and during a
period of five (5) years thereafter, all of its books and records relating to CDBG program
income.
10. This agreement shall be effective for the period of time required for the expen-
diture of all CDBG funds allocated to the City from Federal Fiscal..Years 1989 and 1990
appropriations and from any program income therefrom. In no event shall this agreement be
terminated before June 30, 1991, except as•a result of action by the United States Depart-
ment of Housing and Urban Development.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the governing bodies of the parties hereto have authorized this
agreement and have caused the agreement to be executed by their respective chief executive
officers and attested by the executive officer -clerks thereof as of the day, month and
year first above written.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
BY
ATTEST:
City Clerk
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
EST:
cq� Z (ImmLARRY J. MONTEILH, Executive Officer -
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City •Att-;rney
By
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DE WITT W. CLINTON
County Counsel
By
ADOPTER,,,
AUG 0 91988
h --
`J vLARRY J. MONTEILH
2
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
4,61 • 13 "50A -et -e- 4/0
1.' 1 V
Attachment.0 (1 of 3)
January 18, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the City Council January 24, 1989
APPROVAL OF CDBG PROJECTS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended the City Council conduct the Public Hearing and
approve tne expenditure of. $122,762 CDBG Funds for the following
programs:( '
Housing Rehabilitation $92,072
Public Service $18,4141-'''
Administration $12,276 (0'
BACKGROUND
On July 26, 1988, the City Council approved the City re-entering
tne CDBG Program and also approved the hiring of a consultant to
assist the City in administering the program.
ANALYSIS
The Public Hearing this evening is part of the process to
participate in the program. The attached report is from the
City's consultant detailing tne parameters of the CDBG program
as well as explaining the programs the consultant and staff are
recommending that the City participate in for this coming year.
There are two very important facts to keep in mind as the Council
proceeds with this program:
- Once programs are approved by the Council and for some
reason the program does not work out, the Council can always
go back and amend the contract with the Community Development
Commission and choose another program that may be of benefit
to the Community.
- Any program chosen by the City Council must benefit low
and moderate income persons, or deal with the elimination of
slum and blight conditions. Given this condition, the City
is very limitea in what programs it can participate in.
However, there definitely are some and the recommendation
before you this evening can be approved as is by the Council
or amended as Council sees fit.
The City's consultant, Mr. Bryon Baron will be in attendance at
the Public Hearing to answer any and all questions.
The three areas suggested for funding are: Housing
Rehabilitation, Public Service Programs and Administration.
Staff would like to expand upon those areas as follows:
15
Housing Rehabilitation:
Attachment C .W)of 3)
4'
� G
/
This program can be taken advantage of by any family or
individual who qualifies as a L.ow/modera :income homeowner.
These funds can be used by those--indl_v.iduals to rehab their nomes
in an effort to improve the housing stock of Hermosa Beach. At'
this time, there is no clear indication of tne number of people
who may be interested in the program and who would qualify.
There are approximately 1,000 Seniors living in Hermosa Beach
(per the 1980 census). Once this program is properly advertised
the response to it will be monitored carefully. If it is
determined tnere is not sufficient response to the program the
City Council can amend the contract through the public hearing
process and fund another project.
Public Service Programs:
Staff and consultant are recommending the City Council approve
funding for the local Non-profit organizations the City
ordinarily funds, i.e. 1736, Free Clinic, etc. These funds
cannot be used in place of the City Funds, but can be used to
supplement what the City is already contributing. Staff will
return with specific dollar recommendations for specific
organizations in the very near future.
Part of this funding will also be used for Senior Citizen
Programs. Staff is looking into a joint venture agreement with a
neighboring City as that City is already providing Senior Citizen
Programs. In contracting with this City, Hermosa Beach can take
advantage of programs that already are operational and will not
need to duplicate services and costs. This concept is still
being developed and staff will return at a later date with
details.
Administrative Costs
A portion of the total allocation (10%) needs to be appropriated
for administrative costs. Presently, the consultant is paid for
out of tne General Fund and his duties were to do whatever was
necessary to get the City back into the CDBG Program. As
empnazised in the original staff report, it is extremely
important the City retain a consultant for this program once the
program has begun. That cost can be paid by CDBG funds. And
once tne City is at that stage, we will have to go through an RFP
to advertise for a consultant for this project. That is a CDBG
requirement.
Conclusion:
Staff has spent a considerable amount of time with the Consultant
in developing tne recommendations listed. The recommendations
can be amended by the City Council this evening. The City
Council may wish to consider funding an economic development
project. As an example, some downtown merchants wish to provide
patio dining and appear to be willing to snare costs for this
•
Attachment C (3,• of 3)
with the City. Their letters explaining their interest are
attached. There is also a possibility of the City assisting the
Hospital District in the their development of the Senior Housing
Project that appears to be scheduled for the old hospital site in
Hermosa. These two projects were not recommended by the
consultant and staff for two reasons: 1) it is not known at this
point in time if the Council is interested in either of the
projects; 2) Very little time has been spent with either group to
really examine the projects and perhaps see where the City could
fit in. However, the City Council may want to pursue this and
amend the recommendation. However, the filing deadline for the
CDBG application is February ---therefore some decision must be
made at the Council meeting. However, the Council can amend
these projects any time it wishes.
Concur:
2
QFC/'1��t�•�c�t �
'Kevin B. Nortncraft
City Manager
Respectfully submitted,
�Gti.!{/L.%�iC•il..ul..t��N.Gilti!-t�[..>
Alana Mastriar.-Handman
Assistant City Manager
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Finance Administrator
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
The attached petition regarding patio dining on Pier Avenue is
one concept of how to promote the downtown area. The Chamber
is meeting to discuss this and other options so that all
future downtown changes will be compatible. Accordingly, more
study needs to be completed before responding to the petition,
but it does provide another example of possible future uses
of CDBG funds.
4
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
March 8, 1989
City Council Meeting
of March 14, 1989
TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Responsible Agent
March 28, 1989
Budget Calendar
Consideration of a "press pass"
for parking purposes
Vacation of 21st Street
RFP for audit firm
Award contract irrigation system
evaluation CIP 87-509
Aviation Blvd. traffic Safety
review
Revision of class specifications
for Police Officer and Police
Service Dispatcher
Public Hearings
Appeal of Planning Commission
decision granting a CUP for
construction at 1722 Golden Ave.
Appeal of Planning Commission
decision re. CUP at 540 - 1st St.
April 11, 1989
Accept Community Center air condi-
tioning as complete CIP 88-610
Monterey speed limit
Future plans for Old Prospect
School
Public Hearings
Extension of Video Store moratorium
Finance Administrator
General Services Director
Public Works/Planning
Finance Administrator
Public Works Director
Public Works Director
Personnel Director
Planning Director
Planning Director
Public Works Director
Public Works Director
Community Resources Dir.
Planning Director
April 25, 1989
Accept slurry seal as complete
CIP 87-170
Accept traffic signal improvements
as complete CIP 85-138
Street Lighting District Assessment
a) Resolution approving report
b) Resolution setting public hearing
Crossing Guard District Assessment
a) Resolution approving report
b) Resolution setting public hearing
June 13, 1989
Public Hearings
Crossing Guards District Assessment
Street Lighting District Assessment
June 27, 1989
Accept CIP 88-614 as complete -
Pier Storm Damage
CIP 88-406 Call for Bids - Sewers
Target Area 4
July, 25, 1989
Review of City Goals
Public Works Director
Public Works Director
Public Works Director
Public Works Director
Public Works Director
Public Works Director
Public Works Director
Public Works Director
City Manager
*****************************************************************
Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared
RFP for cost allocation plan
Contract for 1988-1989 audit
Recreational Vehicle ordinance
Development of design standards
and criteria by which to review
projects for EIRS
Adoption of Uniform Fire, Building
and Plumbing Codes
Fire Sprinkler Ordinance
2
Finance Administrator
Finance Administrator
General Services Director
Planning Director
Public Safety/Building
Public Safety Director
Ordinance amending provision against
selling gasoline and alcohol at
same location
Stuart construction bill
Followup on sidewalk repair program
Award of contract - Community Center
fire alarm system CIP 88-604
Award of contract - Traffic signal
pre-emption CIP 86-176
RFP Municipal fishing pier
concession
Review of Power Street grading plan
Refuse contract renewal
"Pooper Scooper" ordinance
Audit of dispatch system
City Attorney
Public Works Director
Public Works Director
Public Works Director
Public Works Director
Public Works Director
Public Works Director
Building Director
General Services Director
Public Safety Director
*+**************s**s**********s******************** **************
March 1, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the City Council March 14, 1989
APPROVAL OF 1989 SPRING/SUMMER BEACH VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENTS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community
Resources Advisory Commission that City Council approve the
attached list of Professional Beach Volleyball Tournaments for
the upcoming Spring/Summer season. (Attachment A).
BACKGROUND
The City has received seven requests for Professional Beach
Volleyball Tournaments for this coming season. Each tournament
was reviewed by the Parks, Recreation and community Resources
Advisory Commission resulting in the above recommendation. Two
other tournament requests, one for the 4th. of July and one for
Labor Day week -end, were rejected .
Last year, 1988, the city approved three permits for three
Professional Beach Volleyball Tournaments. Permit fees collected
by the Dept. of Community Resources were $11,400 and fees
collected by the Police Department for costs incurred were
$7,040. Each tournament went smoothly and conformed to the
City's Professional Beach Volleyball Tournament Policy.
(Attachment B). The one area of concern for the Men's Pro
Tournament was the announcing of the Bathing Beauty Contest.
Attachments C & D reflect the correspondence between City staff
and the organization regarding this problem. Staff feels
confident there will not be a similar problem this year.
ANALYSIS
The following is a short synopsis of each of the tournaments that
is before you for approval this evening.
Assoc. of Volleyball Professionals
They are requesting their annual Men's Pro Volleyball
Tournament on August 26-27. Last year's tourney (run by
the AVP) was conducted very professionally and had no
negative incidents. The beauty contest emcees were
regarded as problematic by Council and staff. Assurance
for improvements in that area have been made. As in years
past, the event will be televised.
lni
Athletic Sports Foundation
They would like to conduct a high school tournament on May
13-14. Sponsored by Nordstrom, this tournament would
involve local high schools with an aniticpated 600-1,000
participants/spectators each day.
C E Sports and Entertainment
They have requested approval for a Women's Pro Tourney
(WPVA) on July 22-23 and will be sponsored by Jag
Sportswear, Pontiac and others. Craig Elledge, who heads C
E Sports has been responsible for several successful pro
volleyball events in Hermsoa Beach including last year's
Kenwood Women's Pro which was very well-run. There will be
television coverage for this event.
Epic Sports Marketing
They would like to present the "Foot Locker Beach Classic."
For this event, 32 colleges and universities from
California and Arizona will send their number one
intramural, six -person coed volleyball teams to compete in
this two day event requested for April 29-30. While the
event will likely have a fair spectator -draw, the April
date is not highly impacted with regular beachgoers. This
event will be televised.
I Dig Sportwear
They want to sponsor and present the 2nd annual Hermosa
Beach Legends of Beach Volleyball event. Last year, I Dig
Sportswear, in conjunction with GDI, had the Legends
Tourney which was one of the finest beach volleyball events
we have had to date. The "Legends" are older volleyball
players of notoriety. The event was wholesome, fun and had
no negative incidents. Dates requested are either July 8-9
or August 12-13.
In addition to these Professional Tournaments, the City itself
also sponsors three amateur tournaments as a member of the
California Beach Volleyball Association (CBVA). These
tournaments are held during the summer months.
On Attachement E staff has listed the dates of all these
volleyball tournaments, and the Surf Festival as well. This will
give the Council an opportunity to see how many weekends are
being utilized with these kinds of activities. As a point of
information, the City of Hermosa will be the host City this year
for the Surf Festival. This means that the major lifeguard
competitions will take place at night here in Hermosa.
From these professional tournaments, staff expects permit fee
revenue in the amount of approximately $20,000. This figure does
not include any fees paid for any direct costs the City incurs on
behalf of these tournaments. i.e. police, public works, etc.
It may also be safe to assume that with the increased number of
requests for Beach Volleyball, Hermosa Beach may be regaining its
status as the #1 beach for volleyball.
Respectfully submitted,
Alana Mastrian-Handman
Director
Dept. of Community Resources
Concur:
evin B. North/raft
City Manager
Steve Wisniewski
Public Safety Director
ATTACHMENT A
1989 BEACH VOLLEYBALL REQUESTS
PREVIOUS YEARS $500 NON
NAME OF ORGANIZATION TOURNAMENT SPONSOR IN HERMOSA DATES REQUESTED REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT
ASSOC. OF VOLLEYBALL
PROFESSIONALS
(Matt Gage)
ATHLETIC SPORTS
FOUNDATION
(Steve Suttich)
MEN'S PRO
MILLER LITE 6 YEARS
HIGH SCHOOL NORDSTROM
BEACH VOLLEYBALL
C E SPORTS WOMEN'S PRO
(Craig Elledge)
NEW
JAG SWIMWEAR 2 YEARS
AUG. 26-27 YES
MAY 13-14 YES
JULY 22-23 YES
EPIC SPORTS INTRAMURAL FOOTLOCKER NEW APRIL 29-30 YES
MARKETING 6 -PERSON
(James Leitz) COED FROM
32 CALIFORNIA
COLLEGES AND
UNIVERSITIES
I DIG LEGENDS OF I DIG
SPORTSWEAR BEACH VOLLEYBALL SPORTSWEAR
(Dave Behar)
1 YEAR
JULY 8-9
OR
AUG. 12-13
YES
ATTACHMENT B
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PRO VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT(S)
POLICY
FEES
Permit fee shall be negotiated by both parties with minimum
amount set at $3,000.
A non-refundable application processing fee of $500 will be
required for all pro tournament requests. The deposit will be
applied towards the $3,000 permit fee and will be refunded only
if the permit request is denied12x the City.
All predetermined costs/fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the
Tournament.
All unanticipated costs incurred by the City on behalf of the
event shall be paid three (3) weeks after tournament.
SECURITY
The City of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the
immediate vicinity of the Tournament. The command post shall be
staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach
Police Department and one representative of the sponsor and/or -
its event promotion firm.
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide no less than ten
security officers. Said officers shall wear identifiable
uniforms that indicate a seperate identity from other Tournament
staff.
A representative of the security staff shall meet with the
Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the
Tournament for a pre -event briefing.
The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for
informing spectators of the City's alcohol ordinance.
The City of Hermosa Beach shall provide Police Officers for the
event as follows for each day of tournament, 10:00 a.m. - 6:00
p.m.:
1 Sergeant
4 Officers
or as many officers as deemed necessary by Public Safety
Director.
Cost of officers shall be assumed by the event promotion
firm/sponsor.
Effective January, 1988
1
CLEAN-UP
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide a professional
maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the
Tournament:
. The Beach and Strand, from 8th Street to 15th Street.
. Pier Avenue, from Strand to Monterey Avenue.
The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the
trash collected outside the City each day of the Tournament.
All maintenance work is to be concluded by 8:00 p.m. each
evening.
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide additional trash
recepticals at the following locations:
• Beach (impacted area)
. Strand (impacted area)
. Parking Lots B and C
. Railroad Right-of-way
or additional trash receptacles as needed
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND'HARBORS SERVICES
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall assume all costs for two (2)
additional lifeguards each day of tournament.
INSURANCE
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide the CITY a Certificate
of Insurance providing liability insurance naming the CITY, and
County of Los Angeles their officers, employees and agents as
additional insured with a minimum coverage of $1 million combined
single limit coverage.
Event promotion firm/sponsor agrees to defend, indemnify, and
hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against
any and all liabilty and expense, including defense costs and
legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission
of the event promotion firm/sponsor its agents, officers and
employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily
injury, death and property damage.
CO-SPONSORS
A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors; with
each co-sponsor permitted one display booth.
Effective January, 1988
2
ADVERTISING
Signage regarding the CITY'S alcohol ordinance shall be required
of the event promotion firm/sponsor. City staff shall determine
criteria for size, wording and locations for posting.
City of Hermosa Beach shall permit two street banners to be
posted for tournament. Cost of installation shall be the
responsibility of the event promotion firm/sponsor.
CITY shall permit event promotion firm/sponsor to display two
large replicas of their product. City staff shall have final
approval of said replicas and determine location.
In the event of an alcohol sponsor, event promotion firm/sponsor
shall be required to make two (2) announcements per hour
informing spectators of the CITY'S alcoholic beverage ordinance.
All sponsor signs, props, product facsimilies, etc. deemed
necessary by event promotion firm/sponsor to identify the event,
shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will
not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain
constitutional rights of event promotion firm/sponsor.
PARKING
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall be required to post signs
throughout the impacted area as well as at major ingress roads to
the CITY indicating 1) where there is free parking and 2) that
the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking
regulations.
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide a shuttle bus service
from a major satellite point(s) on the outskirts of or outside of
Hermosa Beach.
The City shall provide four (4) reserve officers to direct
traffic at locations to be determined by the Hermosa Beach Police
Department.
SPECIAL EVENTS
The CITY shall review all requests for any special events
requested to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall
have the right to deny all requests.
MISCELLANEOUS CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
The CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event
with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors.
If the event promotion firm/sponsor desires any County services,
they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for
County services will be borne by the event promotion
firm/sponsor.
Effective January, 1988
The CITY Police Department shall act as liaison with various
downtown merchants in an effort to mitigate any disruption during
the Tournament.
The City shall allow access to Tournament site for set-up
thirty-six (36) hours prior to Tournament.
The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue, Beach Drive to the
Strand for Tournament staff parking. ...
The CITY shall allow event promotion firm/sponsor the opportunity
to sell official pro volleyball concession items per certain
conditions.
No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted.
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR
DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID POLICY.
MISCELLANEOUS EVENT PROMOTION FIRM/SPONSOR RESPONSIBILITIES
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide as many portable
port -a -johns as determined necessary by City staff.
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall designate area for spectators
to store alcoholic beverages.
Event promotion firm/sponsor shall be responsible for all prize
money, volleyball equipment, sound system and personnel -necessary
for conducting such a tournament.
Event shall be conducted in compliance with City of Hermosa Beach
Noise Ordinances. Ordinances on file at the Dept. of Community
Resources.
•
Effective January, 1988
ATTACHMENT C
City of 2lermosaTeach_
> ..t ►
November 2, 1988
Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885
Mr. Matt Gage
Association of Volleyball Professionals
1021 Sepulveda Blvd. Suite 1
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Dear Matt,
First let me congratulate you on a very successful tournament.
From all the reports I received, it was very well run, orderly
crowds and enjoyed by all.
Unfortunately, Matt, I must mention to you the one concern voiced
by the City Council and my staff as well. The language used at
the bathing beauty contest was totally unacceptable. I realize
you may not have had anything to do with that, but I would like
you to convey to the Miller people the concern of our City
Council and that the future of the bathing beauty contest is in
question. While we wholly endorse the tournament, the bathing
beauty contest, in our opinion, is not needed.
Mary Rooney indicated she was delighted to work with you and we
both hope we can do the same again next year.
Kindest Regards
Alana Mastrian-Handman, Director
Dept. of Community Resources
cc: C,a'ty Manager
b4lary Rooney
:ity Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 379-33121376-6984 • Fire Department 376.24791376.6984 • Police Department 376-7981 1376-6984
November 8, 1988
Alana Mastrian-Handman
Director, Dept. of
Community Resources
Community Center
Civic Center,
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
ATTACHMENT D
Dear Alana,
Thank you for your endorsement of the professional
volleyball tournament we ran in Hermosa Beach in Septem-
ber. The A.V.P. did its best to put forth a professional
product that both the city and the fans of the sport could
be proud of. We also did our utmost to comply fully with
the City of Hermosa Beach's guidelines and restrictions.
Your compliments are an indication that,we succeeded.
As for the beauty contest, I can only apologize. We
pride ourselves on running a very clean contest - in fact,
we and Miller Lite .demand it of our announcers. Unfor-
tunately, in Hermosa Beach we didn't use our regular announc-
ers. We had two very popular radio personalities host our
contest. Although they were thoroughly -briefed regarding
our insistence on a clean program, once they got on stage
they went their own way. Possibly we were too naive to
expect otherwise.
I understand the city council's concern. The beauty
contest was not up to our standards or the city's! I can
only stress that this contest was an exception, not the
rule. Our contests had been run all year without incident
or complaint.
It is our desire to hold a contest again during the
1989 tournament.. The A.V.P. would appreciate the opportunity
to present it in the good natured and upbeat atmosphere we
had_intended to project this year. I would personally guaran-
tee the integrity of the beauty contest in 1989.
ATTACHMENT D
(2)
Before closing, I would be remiss if I did not com-
pliment Mary Rooney on her contribution to our. tournament.
Her integrity, attention to:detail and availability -served
Hermosa Beach and the A.V.P. well. Certainly she shares
no culpability where the beauty contest is concerned..
Once again, thank you for.: your compliments and con-
structive criticism.
Sincerely,
Matt Gage •
Tour Director
Association of
Volleyball Professionals
cc: City Manager
Mary Rooney
MG/lb
ATTACHMENT E
TENTATIVE 1989 SPRING/SUMMER BEACH EVENTS
(2/16/89)
*APRIL 29-30 FOOTLOCKER BEACH CLASSIC
*MAY 13-14 HIGH SCHOOL BEACH VOLLEYBALL
(ATHLETIC SPORTS FOUNDATION)
MAY 27-28 CBVA - MEN'S A
JUNE 10-11 CBVA - MEN'S MASTERS
JULY 8-9 LEGENDS
*JULY 22-23 WOMEN'S PRO VOLLEYBALL (WPVA)
JULY 27-30 1989 DAILY BREEZE SURF FESTIVAL
. LIFEGUARD EVENTS
. FISHING DERBY
. POWER LOUNGING
AUGUST 5-6 CBVA - WOMEN'S OPEN
AUGUST 12-13 LEGENDS
AUGUST 26-27 MEN'S PRO VOLLEYBALL (AVP)
*New tournaments requested for 1989.
MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING of the City Council of
the City of Hermosa Beach, California held on Tuesday, February
21, 1989 at the hour of 6:03 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor
Rosenberger
Absent: None
The following matters were continued to this date from the
February 14, 1989 City Council meeting:
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
8. REVIEW OF A GRADING PLAN FOR POWER STREET SUBDIVISION,
TRACT NO. 30986. Memorandum from Planning Director
Michael Schubach dated February 7, 1989. Supplemental
information from Jim Marquez with Exhibits dated
February 9, 1989 and letter from Warner Lombardi dated
February 14, 1989.
A staff report was presented by Planning Director
Schubach. Public Works Director Anthony Antich recom-
mended that the decision on this matter be posponed un-
til some concerns about the engineering and hydrology
can be resolved between the developer's engineer and
himself.
Action: To continue this item to the first meeting in
March.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton.
AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor
Rosenberger
NOES - None
Final Action: To place this matter before the Public
Hearings on the agenda.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.
9. STUDY OF BUS BENCHES AND SHELTERS. Memorandum from
Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 11,
1989. (Contined from Jan. 24 and Feb. 14, 1989.)
A staff report was presented by Planning Director
Schubach stated that staff would recommend a combination
of benches, depending on the location.
Addressing the Council on this item were:
Howard Longacre - requested no advertising on benches.
Wilma Burt - many areas not large enough for enclosures.
Action: No advertising on benches; use Prop A funds for
new benches; staff to determine where sheltered benches
should be.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.
1
Minutes 2-21-89
la
•1
10. ANNUAL REPORT OF ACTIVITIES - 1988. Memorandum from
City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated February 9, 1989.
A staff report was presented by City Manager Northcraft.
Action: To receive and file, making copies available to
the library and the press.
Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered.
11. RECOMMENDTION TO APPROVE CONTRACT FOR LEGAL SERVICES IN
FINANCING OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION. Memorandum from
Finance Administrator Viki Copeland dated Feb. 9, 1989.
A staff report was presented by City Manager Northcraft
requesting that the Council receive and file the infor-
mation and otherwise table the recommendation.
Addressing the Council on this item were:
Wilma Burt - recommended caution
Howard Longacre - status of escrow; opposes arbitrage
Proposed Action: To receive and file the information
and table the recommendation.
Motion Creighton. Dies for lack of second.
Action: We have staff come back to us at the earliest
date with the answers to the four questions raised by
the City Manager.
(1. Who will be our consultants. 2. Will we use General
Obligation Bonds or Certificates of Participation.
3. Will we reduce costs by taking advantage of legal
arbitrage. 4. Whether to issue less than $5 Million.)
Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered.
13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
(a)
Recommendation to reduce costs by revising Planning Com-
mission minute procedures. Memorandum from City Manager
Kevin B. Northcraft dated February 6, 1989.
Action: To receive and file report.
Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered.
(b) Status of audit of Public Safety Dispatch system. Memo-
randum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dat-
ed February 6, 1989.
City Manager Northcraft stated that this was meant to be
an interim report, and the audit is ongoing. It will
probably be two or three more weeks before the technical
and management reports will be ready.
Minutes 2-21-89
15. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS - None
At this time Mayor Rosenberger mentioned a letter from
the Los Angels County Board of Supervisors regarding
Earthquake Awareness Program. He requested that this be
agendized.
Councilmember Williams stated that her request for
reconsideration of the City Manager's housing assistance
will be on the next regular agenda.
ADJOURNMENT
The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California adjourned on Tuesday, February 21, 1989
at the hour of 7:27 P.M. to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tues-
day, February 28 at the hour of 7:30 P.M.
City Clerk
3
Minutes 2-21-89
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, February 28, 1989 at
the hour of 7:35 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)
regarding litigation as follows: Escalante v. Hermosa Beach,
Gotanda v. Hermosa Beach, Marcus v. Hermosa Beach, Quanta v.
Hermosa Beach, Wilhite v. Hermosa Beach, Food & Fuel, Creighton
v. Hermosa Beach; Real Estate Negotiations involving 2nd and 3rd
Street lots and Personnel.
Present: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor
Rosenberger
Absent: None
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Sheldon
ROLL CALL
Present: Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor
Rosenberger
Absent: None
ANNOUNCEMENT FROM CLOSED SESSION
Settlement of Food & Fuel v. Hermosa Beach and Creighton v.
Hermosa Beach, favorably for the City.
PRESENTATION OF HERMOSA BEACH/LORETO SISTER CITY EXCHANGE
STUDENTS AND ADULT CHAPERONES BY SISTER CITY ASSOCIATION
PRESIDENT GEORGE BARKS.
PRESENTATION OF STATUS REPORT ON BILTMORE SITE BY BILTMORE SITE
CITIZENS ADVISORY TASK FORCE. Memorandum dated February 23,
1989. The report was presented by Chairman George Schmeltzer.
CITIZEN COMMENTS - None
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
Action: To approve Consent Calendar recommendations (a)
through (o) with the exception of the following items
which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order
for clarity: (a) Creighton, (f) Williams, (g) Sheldon,
(1) Rosenberger, (m) Rosenberger, and (n) Sheldon.
Motion Sheldon, second' Creighton. So ordered.
(a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes:
1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on
February 14, 1989.
Councilmember Creighton requested a reconsideration of
Item 7, Page 10. Zone Change from M-1 and Open Space to
R-2 with maximum of 13 -Unit condo or to such other zone
as deemed appropriate at 603 First Street..
1
la 1Z
Minutes 2-28-89
City Attorney Lough stated that the Council could send
it down to the Planning Commission for immediate Public
Hearing with the necessary environmental documentation
to bring back for rezoning that area; any other area
deemed necessary; to R-1 or any other appropriate zone.
There was consensus that the intent of Council was to
send it back to the Planning Commission to "take another
look at"; and back to the Council as soon as possible.
The City Attorney stated that he will prepare a report
for the next meeting.
Action: To approve the minutes.
Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered.
Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants
Nos. 28845 and 29157 through 29296 inclusive; noting
voided warrants 29170 through 29173 inclusive and 29221.
Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future
Agenda Items.
Recommendation to receive and file the City Treasurer's
report for January, 1989.
Recommendation to adopt a resolution amending Resolution
84-4738 to reflect a change in the bail schedule per-
taining to Animal and Fowl, Section 4-2, and requesting
the Presiding Judge of the South Bay Municipal Court to
enact such bail schedule. Memorandum from General Ser-
vices Director Joan Noon dated February 21, 1989.
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5234, entitled 'A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 84-4738 TO REFLECT A
CHANGE IN THE BAIL SCHEDULE PERTAINING TO ANIMALS AND
FOWL, AND TO REQUEST THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE SOUTH
BAY MUNICIPAL COURT TO ENACT THE ATTACHED BAIL AMOUNT
FOR SAID VIOLATIONS."
Recommendation to receive and file analysis of Air
Quality Management District Plan - transportation, land
use, and conservation measures including its relation-
ship to City's alternate work schedule. Memorandum from
Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 16,
1989.
Action: To receive and file.
Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered.
Recommendation to receive and file Fiscal Year 1986-87
Proposition A Subregional Incentive Transit Grant up-
date. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated February 16, 1989.
2
1
Minutes 2-28-89
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(1)
Action: To receive and file.
Motion Sheldon, second Simpson. So ordered.
Recommendation to approve agreement with State of Cal-
ifornia for Federal aid - Highland Avenue widening from
Longfellow Avenue to 35th Street. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 16,
1989.
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5235, entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 TO LOCAL
AGENCY STATE AGREEMENT NO. 07-5155 FOR PURPOSES OF FUND-
ING FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE WIDENING FROM LONGFELLOW TO 35TH
STREET."
Recommendation to adopt a resolution approving Final Map
No. 17513 for a four -unit condominium at 1020 Monterey
Boulevard. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated February 21, 1989.
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5236, entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP
# 17513 FOR A FOUR -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT
1020 MONTERELY BOULEVARD, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA."
Recommendation to adopt a resolution approving Final Map
No. 45183 for a six -unit -condominium at 1522, 1524, 1530
Loma Drive. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated February 21, 1989.
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5237, entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP
# 45183 FOR A SIX -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT
1522-1530 LOMA DRIVE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA."
Recommendation to approve a month to month lease, for
four (4) parking spaces on Lot "G', to A & H Motors,
contingent upon Planning Commission approval of a condi-
tional use permit to operate an auto brokerage at 424
Pacific Coast Highway. Memorandum from General Services
Director Joan Noon dated February 14, 1989.
•
Recommendation to adopt a resolution repealing Resolu-
tion No. 88-5098 and establishing the salary and other
terms and conditions of employment for the City Manager
for the term February 1, 1989 through January 31, 1990.
Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat-
ed February 22, 1989.
- 3 - Minutes 2-28-89
Jr
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5238, entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 88-5098 AND
ESTABLISHING THE SALARY AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS
OF EMPLOYMENT FOR CITY MANAGER KEVIN B. NORTHCRAFT FOR
THE TERM FEBRUARY 1, 1989 THROUGH JANUARY 31, 1990.",
amending Exhibit "A" Agreement Page 3, Item B. July to
May and Item C. November to September.
Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger.
The City Manager stated for the minutes that he concurrs
with the above action.
Recommendation to receive and file informational report
regarding testing for lead in the water supply at
various City facilities. Memorandum from Public Safety
Director Steve Wisniewski dated February 21, 1989.
Addressing the Council on this item were:
Howard Longacre - requesting independent testing
Parker Herriott - inquired regarding testing in homes
Action: To receive and file.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.
Recommendtaion to set the Sidewalk, Driveway, Curb and
Gutter Damage Assessment for public hearing to be dis-
cussed with the Capital Improvement Budget. Memorandum
from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February
7, 1989.
Proposed Action: To approve staff recommendation.
Motion Williams - dies for lack of second.
Proposed Further Action: To approve staff recommenda-
tion with individual notice given to each property af-
fected. (Appx. 1300 locations)
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton.
Amendment to Proposed Further Action: To break the
areas into zones or priorities.
Accepted by the maker and the second.
At this time the motion was withdrawn.
Action: To refer to staff for further study.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered, noting
the objection of Williams.
Recommendation to authorize contracting with a consul-
tant for audit of the Public Safety communications sys-
tem and to appropriate an amount not to exceed
$3,500.00. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve
Wisniewski dated February 23, 1989.
- 4 - Minutes 2-28-89
0,
Action: To authorize the City Manager to enter into an
agreement with Richter Group Communications Consultants,
and appropriate an amount, not to exceed $3,500 from
Prospective Expenditures to pay for the services.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
At this time item a, f, g, 1, m, and n were discussed
but are listed in order for clarity.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC - None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
5. TO CONSIDER AMENDING SECTION 4-8, HERMOSA BEACH
MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING AN OFF -LEASH DOG EXERCISE
AND TRAINING AREA AT THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE
GREENBELT/RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, WITH ORDINANCE FOR
WAIVER OF FULL READING AND INTRODUCTION. Memorandum
from General Services Director Joan Noon dated February
6, 1989. Supplemental letters: 22 in favor, 2 opposed;
and attendance sheet for meeting showing 108 present.
A staff report was presented by Director Noon.
The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to ad-
dress the council in favor of the off -leash area:
Tom Arp - 233 Ardmore Avenue
Bob Holtel - Manhattan Beach
Gene Spence - 115 Manhattan Avenue
Bill Smith - 144 Monterey
Eva Mitchell - 425 Longfellow
Richard Donnelly - 249 Valley Drive
Speaking in opposition were:
Howard Longacre - 1221 -7th Place
Dave Rymer - 802 Monterey Blvd.
Action: Not to adopt Ordinance presented tonight, and
staff to bring back an Ordinance to establish a leash
free area (path, run) south of Pier Avenue designated
and seperated from the pedestrian path.
Further direction including: 1) Refer to the Community
Resources/Parks and Recreation Commission for further
study and recommendation. 2) Direct staff to prepare an
ordinance that requires dog owners to carry a container
to clean up after their dog. 3) Additional trash cans to
be installed along the area. 4) Require a leash free
license. 5) Proper signage.
5
Minutes 2-28-89
Proposed Amendment: To require that the licensees be
Hermosa Beach residents and sign a liability waiver.
Proposed by Sheldon, but not accepted by the maker of
the motion.
Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton.
AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger
NOES - Simpson (due to the fact that she feels the
entire area should be leash free)
A recess was called at 9:45 P.M.
The meeting reconvened at 10:05 P.M.
6. PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT TO ELIMINATE ZERO LOT LINE IN R -
2B ZONE, WITH ORDINANCE FOR WAIVER OF FULL READING AND
INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated February 21, 1989.
A staff report was presented by Director Schubach.
The Public Hearing was opened. No one coming forward to
speak, the Public Hearing was closed.
Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 89-975
entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, DELETING A PORTION OF SECTION 551 OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING ZERO SIDE YARD SETBACKS
WITHIN R -2B ZONES AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARA-
TION, amending to delete Item C line 13 & 14, Page 1.
Motion Wiliams, second Creighton.
AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor
Rosenberger
NOES - None
Final Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 89-975.
Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered.
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
7. MID -YEAR BUDGET REVIEW 1988-89. Memorandum from Finance
Administrator Viki Copeland dated February 22, 1989.
A staff report was presented by Administrator Copeland
with visual slides; and City Manager Northcraft.
Action: To transfer the Seaview Proceeds ($391,459)
less $110,000 for legal expense to the UUT ROW fund and
designate that amount ($281,459) for the A.T. & S.F.
Railroad right-of-way purchase.
Motion Creighton, second Williams.
AYES - Creighton, Simpson, Williams
NOES - Sheldon', Mayor Rosenberger
6
Minutes 2-28-89
Further Action: To approve staff recommendations as
follows:
1. Approve the revisions to estimated revenue, approp-
riations and budget transfers as presented in "City
of Hermosa Beach Midyear Budget Summary 1988-89"
referenced as Exhibit A.
2. Receive and file the report on midyear review with
supporting documents and the report on the status
of capital improvement projects as of midyear.
3. Approve the policy change for expenditure of funds
from the Asset Forfeiture Fund as reflected in
Exhibit B.
4. Transfer the $200,000 Designation for Open Space from
the General Fund to the UUT ROW Fund.
Motion Williams, second Creighton. So ordered.
8. REPORT ON REFUSE ENCLOSURE ENFORCEMENT. Memorandum from
Building and Safety Director William Grove dated
February 20, 1989.
A staff report was presented by Director Grove with
visual slides.
Addressing the Council on this item was:
Howard Longacre - requesting amortizing older buildings
and that some building might not need the dumpsters.
•
Action: To approve staff recommendation to direct staff
to pursue refuse enclosure enforcement as indicated and
to direct staff to include upgrading of the refuse en-
closures for the shared refuse bin locations in the
downtown area in the Capital Improvement Budget.
Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered.
9. PROPOSED URGENCY ORDINANCE PLACING MORATORIUM ON SALE OF
VIDEOS OF ANY RIND IN ANY STORE IN THE C-1 OR C-2 ZONES.
Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated
February 22, 1989.
Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 89-976
entitled "AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE IS-
SUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESSES THAT SELL AND/OR RENT
VIDEO TAPES IN THE C-1 AND C-2 ZONES", amending to
change neighborhood commercial zones to neighborhood and
restricted commercial zones throughout the Ordinance.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton.
AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor
Rosenberger
NOES - None
7
Minutes 2-28-89
Final Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-976.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton.
AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams
NOES - Mayor Rosenberger
10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - None
11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL - None
12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items:
Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated February
23, 1989.
(a) Request by Councilmember Simpson for agenda item on the
subject of school properties.
Direction was given that this will be put on the agenda
for the next joint meeting with the School Board.
(b) Request by Councilmember Williams for discussion of how
written communications are handled.
Councilmember Williams withdrew this item after she
received additional information regarding the policy
from the City Manager.
(c) Request by Councilmember Williams for reconsideration of
City Manager housing assistance.
Action: To discuss this item.
Motion Williams, second Rosenberger.
Addressing the council on this item was Parker Herriott
- in opposition to the loan.
Final Action: To rescind the loan offer to the City
Manager for housing.
Motion Williams, second Rosenberger.
AYES - Creighton, Simpson, Williams
NOES - Sheldon, Mayor Rosenberger
(d) Request by Councilmember Simpson for discussion of
public tours of Sanitation District Facilities.
Councilmember Simpson encouraged citizens to visit the
plant in Carson and the waste energy plant on the hill.
Call Joe Harworth at 699-7411 ext. 2302.
(e) Request by Mayor Rosenberger for discussion of L. A.
County Earthquake Survival Program.
Action: To participate in the program.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.
- 8 - Minutes 2-28-89
13. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS
Howard Longacre - regarding rate increase of MultiVi-
sion, replaying of meetings; asbestos pipe and lead
repars; requested information regarding what has been
done recently in replacing water mains and increasing
fire flows.
Parker Herriott - requesting water company send out
warning letters regarding lead and addressed the use of
asbestos pipe.
At this time Councilmember Sheldon requested a report on the at-
tendance record of all City Commissioners. Councilmember Simpson
asked if the city ever considered designated alternates.
ADJOURNMENT
The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California adjourned on Wednesday, March 1, 1989 in memory
of former city employee John Price, who was a Parks and Public
Works Supervisor with the city for over 26 years, and passed away
recently; at the hour of 12:28 A.M. to a Regular Meeting to be
held on Tuesday, March 14, 1989 at the hour of 7:30 P.M.
9
/4,0 n 0(e4 (447&4
City Clerk
Minutes 2-28-89
•
M
r -
v
•r
IP
v
r
r
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION -.-
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST '
• FOR 03/14/89
PAGE 0001 .J
DATE 03/09/89
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK *
DATE INVC... PROJ * ;ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION__ __ AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
H ANTHONY *ANTICH 00030 001-400-4202-4317 00047 4130.00 00237 29298
PER DIEM ADVANCE • 03/01/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONFERENCE EXPENSE
*** VENDOR TOTAL *+ VVVVV uui***********************•******.11**e**_.- .._.*130. 00 _._---
H BEACH TRAVEL
TRAVEL ADVANCE/A. ANTICH
40.00 03/08/89
00252 001-400-4202-4317 00049 4218.00 00237 29300
03/01/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONFERENCE EXPENSE
*** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************************w***** .-_. ._ *218.00 .- ----
H CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES. INC.
WORK COMP FINAL AUDIT
_ *** VENDOR TOTAL ******
(�
r•
w •I •
00038 705-400-1217-4201 00043 43.066.00
03/01/89 WORKERS COMP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
H JOSEPH*GAINES
• TRAINING ATTIRE
************************************ -- *3.066. 00 _ _
02720 001-400-2101-4312 00843 *74.28
03/07/89 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST
*4* VENDOR TOTAL _ ************ *******************+r ****-- --- -- 4174.28 - - ---
H GATES MC DONALD
REIMB WORK COMP/JAN 89
40.00 03/08/89
•
08204 29301
40.00 03/08/89
07943 29309
40.00 • 03/08/89
02596 705-400-1217-4182 00087 42.881.37 08201 29302
03/01/89 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR
VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** _.._.._.-*2.881.37 - . -
40.00 03/08/89
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 001-202-0000-2030 00265 417.461.27 29310
PAY-BACK/D. ALLEN REHIRE 03/09/89 /ACCRUED PAYROLL *0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************...----*17.461.27---- -
H KURT*MICHEL
02719 001-400-2101-4312 00842 *74.28 07949 29308
TRAINING ATTIRE • 03/07/89 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE • POST
*** VENDOR TOTAL **** **********************************4********* . --- - - .. $74.28 _. _ _._ - - - -
H MIRAMAR COLLEGE
TUITION/L. SARMANIAN
---
160.00 03/08/89
- 02451 001-400-2101-4312 00841 420.00 29307 29307
03/02/89 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST
•
1
40.00 03/08/89
1b.
• J
4i
•
*11
•
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION. __...
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0002
FOR 03/14/89 DATE 03/09/89
VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK *
DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION __._._ • AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL * ***o**************** **** a• as aHHHH**** u•********* •
H _. _ MONTEREY SHERATON HOTEL ._._..
HOTEL ADVANCE/A. ANTICH
*20. 00
02712 001-400-4202-4317 00048. *198.00 _.
03/01/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONFERENCE EXPENSE
*** VENDOR TOTAL. **********************************************************
*198. 00
PROF COMMUNICATIONS INSTALLERS._-. 02526 001-400-2101-5402. 00022 *3.964.04
EMERG EQUIP/PATROL CARS 02/23/89 POLICE /EQUIP—MORE THAN *500
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
*3. 964. 04
H .. PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS .__ _ . 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00283 $74.143.04_
RETIREMENT ADV/FEB 89 . 03/09/89 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
_H RANCHO BERNANRDO TRAVELODGE.._.._.. 02718 001-400-2101-4312
LODGING/L. SARMANANIAN 03/02/89 POLICE
*74. 143. 04
00237 29299
*0.00 03/08/89
07941 29297
*0.00 03/08/89
29311 _
*0.00 03/09/89
00840 *609. 12 _ _. _._ __. __. 07936 _._ . 29306
/TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST *0.00 03/08/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
LARISSA*SARMANIAN ._.__________ 02717 001-400-2101-4312
. MEALS/BASIC DISPATCH 03/02/89 POLICE
*609. 12
00839 __ $300.00 _ . -
/TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST
*300.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************************
J. S. *WARD & CO. AS AGENT. FOR __
REIMB LIAR/JAN 89
H J. 8. *WARD & CO. AS AGENT FOR
REIMB LIAB/JAN 89
02466 705-400-1209-4201 00082
03/01/89 LIABILITY INS
02466 705-400-1209-4324 00091
03/01/89 LIABILITY INS
*7.373. 00 .
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*3.164.05
/CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS
*** VENDOR..TOTAL__****************************************************.a.***************----*10,537.05
• *** PAY CODE TOTAL***********************************************************.******* *113.676.45
RA&8 AIR CONDITIONING.,`.__.
WORK DONE AT COMM CTR
NOM 6�pPAd`IifOlYtal7�ir
07935 . 29305
*0:00 03/08/89 !
07099 _ 29303
*0.00 03/08/89
07099 29303 •
*0.00 03/08/89
.►J
J
i d
_00002 _ 001-400-4204-4321 00428 *234.00 ` .. _ . _.. 08121 29316 _ _ __ ,
02/15/89 . . BLDG MAINT •/BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT *0.00 03/09/89
1_
r " P '•' -�'9
FINANCE-SFA34O
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
-_----.... DESCRIPTION ---•_-.
A&B AIR CONDITIONING
DUCT WORK/POLICE REMODEL -
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0003
FOR 03/14/89
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT
DATE 03/09/89
INV/REF PO * CHK *
_DATE INVC _ PROJ * . -:. ACCOUNT _DESCRIPTION _ _ - ___ _.. -... AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
00002 001-400-8602-4201 00033 $687.00 07617 29316
02/23/89 CIP 86-602 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $687.00 03/09/89
***.VENDOR TOTAL_*********** *** +w*.*.* * ********* ***. $921..00 -- -
R A-1 COAST RENTALS 00029 001-400-8614-4201 00017 $138.42 568670 00021 29317
MISC CHCS/FEB 89 68670 02/28/89 CIP 88-614 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR_TOTAL******************************************************************** _.__ . __.._ $138.42. ..,.__
*
R A-1 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
BOOKING RM OFFICE EQUIP
02180 001-400-2101-4305 00929 $186.06 07488 29318
03/06/89 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $186.05 03/09/89
R A-1 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 02180 001-400-2101-5401 00007 _. $739.11 07488 .. 29318
BOOKING RM OFFICE EQUIP 03/06/89 POLICE /EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 $739.11 03/09/89 1
R A-1 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 02180 001-400-2101-5402 00023 $4.987.41 07425 29318
OFFICE EQUIP/POLICE • 03/06/89 POLICE /EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 $4,987.40 .03/09/89
VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************- ___._. *5. 912. 58 __ ---.___-._ ._. _
R ADVANCE ELEVATOR
00003 001-400-4204-4201 00307 $80.00 21334 00003 29319
ELEV MAINT/MARCH 89 21334 03/01/89 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************************
_ _<.... $80.00
R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00857 001-400-2101-4306 00617 $207.00 _ 00023 29320
MISC CHCS/FEB 89 02/28/89 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 03/09/89
-- _*** VENDOR TOTAL_********************************************************--_---. $207.00. _---_ -._ ___
R ASPA
DUES/V. COPELAND
00953 001-400-1202-4315 00036 $85.00. 07355 29321 •
03/02/89 FINANCE ADMIN /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************************************r----__. , $85._00--
r •
R ASPLUNDH _
BUCKET LINER FOR TRUCK 92138
00487 105-400-2601-4309 00456 $537.89 .. 92138 08113 '29322
02/28/89 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $537.89 03/09/89
J
,J
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION __
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/89
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL*************a*****aw****************************a******************
R AUTOMOTIVE PAINT CENTER
MISC CHOS/FEB 89
PAGE 0004
DATE 03/09/89
INV/REF PO * CHK N
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$537.89
01891 001-400-3104-4309 00185 . $381.80
02/28/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R JULIE*BALL
THEATRE TECH/FEB 18
R JULIE*BALL
LIGHT TECH/FEB 9/12/89
01527 001-400-4601-4201 00291
02/22/89 COMM RESOURCES
01527 001-400-4601-4201 00293
02/16/89 COMM RESOURCES
$381.80
$85.00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$105.00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** -----$190.00
R BANK OF'AMERICA
• FEB EXP/K. NORTHCRAFT
00180 001-400-1201-4317 00172 $97.80
03/08/89 CITY MANAGER /CONFERENCE EXPENSE
*** VENDOR TOTAL************************************************4******************* _
BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY, INC.
REPAIR CITY YARD GARAGE 6420.
_ $97.80 .__
01889 001-400-4204-4321 00430 $216.95
01/17/89 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT
•$216.95_. ...
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R
R
R
R
BEACH CITIES
MISC CHCS/FEB
BEACH CITIES
MISC CHOS/FEB
BEACH CITIES
MISC CHOS/FEB
BEACH CITIES
MISC CHCS/FEB
BEACH CITIES
MISC CHOS/FEB
OFFICE SUPPLY
89
OFFICE SUPPLY..
89
OFFICE SUPPLY
89 -
02509 001-400-1141-4305 00079
02/28/89 CITY TREASURER
02509 001-400-1202-4305 00210
02/28/89 FINANCE ADMIN
02509 001-400-2201-4305 00268
02/28/89 FIRE
OFFICE SUPPLY _ -_ 02509
89 02/28/89
OFFICE SUPPLY
89
001-400-3104-4309. 00187.
TRAFFIC SAFETY
02509 001-400-4101-4305 00280
02/28/89 PLANNING
$11.51
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$34.50
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$13.25 '
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$11.91 _.
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$21.21
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
00024 29323
$0.00 03/09/89
07723 29324
$0.00 03/09/89
07719 29324
$0.00 03/09/89
06676 29325
$0.00 •03/09/89
6420 08122 29326
$0.00 03/09/89
00249 29327
$0.00 03/09/89
00249 29327
$0.00 03/09/89
00249 29327
$0.00 03/09/89
_ _ _ _00249 00249 ._ 29327
$0.00 03/09/89
00249 29327
$0.00 03/09/89
J
* •
PAY VENDOR NAME
___ __ _ .. DESCRIPTION
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY
MISC CHCS/FEB 89
BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY_
MISC CHGS/FEB 89
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/89
VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT
DATE INVC_ PROJ * .'ACCOUNT DE8CRIPTION__.__
PAGE 0005
DATE 03/09/89
INV/REF PO * CHK *
—.__ _ _ AMOUNT UNENC. DATE EXP _ _I
02509 001-400-4202-4305 00371 $6.04
02/28/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
02509 _001-400-4204-4309 01254_ $19.98
02/28/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL*f***a+****************wa***********aa*r**e*w**********a*r********* r
R BIEBER LIGHTING CORPORATION _
TENNIS COURT METERS 07696
$118.40
00249 29327
$0.00 03/09/89
00249 29327
$0.00 03/09/89
._ 00033 .001-400-6101-4309.. 00656._ $285.16 .__..07696 07696 29328
02/27/89 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $285.16 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************e*****************44****
R JIM*BLICKENSDERFER
THEATRE TECH/FEB 18
01303
02/22/89
__ $285.16
001-400-4601-4201 00292_- $91.00 _._ _.07724 29329
COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/09/89
4** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
BROOKES ELECTRIC
DIMMER SYS/COMM CTR THEA 8190
00355 001-400-4204-4201 00308
02/26/89 BLDG MAINT
$91.00
$980.00 • __ 8190 07640
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $980.00
$980.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL. ********************************************************************
R
R
R
R
R
!
GARY*BRUTSCH.
PETTY CASH/FEB
GARY*BRUTSCH.
PETTY CASH/FEB
GARY*BRUTSCH.
PETTY CASH/FEB
CITY TREASURER
89
CITY TREASURER
89
CITY TREASURER
89
TREASURER
GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY
PETTY CASH/FEB 89
GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER
PETTY CASH/FEB 89
GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER
PETTY CASH/FEB 89
02016 001-300-0000-3904 00244
02/28/89
02016 001-400-1122-4305 00081
02/28/89 ELECTIONS
02016 001-400-1201-4305 00126
02/28/89 CITY MANAGER
02016 001-400-1202-4305 00208
02/28/89 FINANCE ADMIN
02016
02/28/89
02016 001-400-2101-4305 00931
02/28/89 POLICE
$5. 00CR
/GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS
$0.20
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$0.20
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$9.20 '
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
001-400-1207-4305 00153 _. •
BUS LICENSE /OFFICE
$4.21 __.__
OPER SUPPLIES
$87.61
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
•
29330
03/09/89
_. 07176 . _ 29332
$0.00. 03/09/89 '
07176 29332
$0.00 03/09/89
07176 29332
$0.00 03/09/89
07176 29332
$0.00 03/09/89
07176 29332 _
$0.00 03/09/89
07176 • 29332
$0.00 03/09/89
•
ewe
J
fesi
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R GARY*BRUTSCH.
PETTY CASH/FEB
_ R GARY*BRUTSCH.
PETTY CASH/FEB
R GARY*BRUTSCH.
PETTY CASH/FEB
_R GARY*BRUTSCH,
PETTY CASH/FEB
R GARY*BRUTSCH.
PETTY CASH/FEB
GARY*BRUTSCH.
PETTY CASH/FEB
R GARY*BRUTSCH.
PETTY CASH/FEB
R GARY*BRUTSCH.
PETTY CASH/FEB
R GARY*BRUTSCH.
PETTY CASH/FEB
***
CITY TREASURER
89
CITY TREASURER
89
CITY TREASURER
89
CITY TREASURER.__.
89
CITY TREASURER
89
CITY TREASURER
89
CITY TREASURER
89
CITY TREASURER
89
CITY TREASURER
89
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/89
PAGE 0006
DATE 03/09/89
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER. TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK *
DATE INVC PROJ * . ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION . AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
02016 001-400-2101-4310 00170
02/28/89 POLICE
02016 001-400-2101-4316 00334
02222222/28/89 POLICE
02016 001-400-2201-4305 00266
02/28/89 FIRE
02016 001-400-4202-4305 00370
02/28/89 PUB WKS ADMIN
02016 001-400-4204-4309 01250
02/28/89 BLDG MAINT
02016 001-400-4601-4305 00630
02/28/89 COMM RESOURCES
02016 001-400-6101-4309 00652
02/28/89 PARKS
__ 02016
02/28/89
110-400-3302-4305 00543
PARKING ENF
02016 110-400-3302-4305 00544
02/28/89 PARKING ENF
$4.00
/MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
__ $10. 00 ... _
/TRAINING
$38.93
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$10.58
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$42.50
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$9.43
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$6.37
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$20.00
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$20.00
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
VENDOR TOTAL*******************************4***********************a.*******,*****
R JAMES*BURQUE
THEATRE TECH/FEB 12
$258.23 .
02544 001-400-4601-4201 00289 $123.50
02/22/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT.
*4* VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** ._..__._.$123.50 -
R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY 00034
TYPEWRITER STAND . 48688 02/17/89
__ R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY _ 00034 _
CASSETT RECORDER/BLDG 48989. 02/28/89
001-400-1203-5401 00004
PERSONNEL
001-400-4201-5401 00002
BUILDING
$57.46 • 148688
/EQUIPMENT—LESS THAN.$50
$54.26 ___.148989
/EQUIP—LESS THAN $500
$111.72
*4* VENDOR TOTAL. ***********************************.****.***.************.****** ,*****
CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. INC.__ 00599
PARKS MAINT/DEC88/FEB89 02/28/89
001-400-3101-4201 00010 $6.000.00 1
MEDIANS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
07176 29332
$0.00 03/09/89
07176 29332
$0.00 03
07176 29332
$0.00 03/09/89
07176 29332
$0.00 03/09/89
•
07176 29332
$0.00 03/09/89
07176 29332
$0.00 03/09/89
07176 29332
$0.00 03/09/89
07176 29332
$0.00 03/09/89
07176 29332
$0.00 03/09/89
07720 29333
$0.00 03/09/89
07061 29334
$57.46 03/09/89
07506 __.. 29334 _
$54.26 03/09/89
______ 00061 _... 29335 _
$0.00 03/09/89
J
•
•
•
•
•
•
J
•
•
•
•
OP
•
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST
TIME 15:27:55 FOR 03/14/89
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION . ___.._...
R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. INC.
PARKS MAINT/DEC88/FEB89
PAGE 0007
DATE 03/09/89
VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO N CHK N
DATE INVC. PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION .__—.___.,._. _ ... _..AMOUNT UNENC .. DATE EXP .._ _
00599 001-400-6101-4201
02/28/89 PARKS
00137 417.420.00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR _ TOTAL ************ ************************** *****a**a********a*• *****. --,._ $23c420-00 -
R CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES. INC.
PUB OFFICIAL BONDS
00038 705-400-1210-4201 00024 4900.00
02/27/89 AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
.*** VENDOR _TOTAL ,*******************************************************************a----__-----4900_00 —._
R CALIF NARCOTICS OFCRS ASSOC.
TUIT/3 POLICE EMP
01797 001-400-2101-4316 00333 480.00
• 02/23/89 POLICE /TRAINING
00061 29335
40.00 03/09/89
08202 29336
40.00 03/09/89
07942 29337
40.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** _480.00------ —--_
R THE*CALIF PARK & REC. SOCIETY
DUES/COMM CENTER
00602 001-400-4601-4315 00047 4330.00..
02/22/89 COMM RESOURCES /MEMBERSHIP
*** VENDOR YOTAL_********************************************************************
R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
WATER BILLS/FEB 89
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
WATER BILLS/FEB 89
R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
WATER BILLS/FEB 89
00016 001-400-3101-4303 00030
02/28/89 MEDIANS
00016 001-400-4204-4303 00293
02/28/89 BLDG MAINT
00016 001-400-6101-4303 00243
02/28/89 PARKS
*678. 89
/UTILITIES
$398.71.
/UTILITIES
$1.259.48
/UTILITIES
VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************..- $2,337. 08
R CAMLOX INDUSTRIES _
LAMINATING POUCHES
00468 110-400-3302-4305 00542 4670.94
4844 01/10/89 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
07721 29338
40.00 03/09/89
00029 29339
40.00 03/09/89
00029 .. 29339
40.00 03/09/89
00029 29339
40.00 03/09/89
4844 07806 29340 •
4665.63 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** - _0670.94
_ -
R DAVID*CAPLAN
CITE PAYMENT REFUND
02704 110-300-0000-3302 26021 418.00 790636 07860 29341
90636 03/07/89 /COURT FINES/PARKING 40.00 03/09/89
1
J
sr
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/89
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER, TRN * AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION .___....
*** VENDOR TOTAL *****************ter************ ****a****+tom**aw*a**********#**a**
_. R __.. _. CAREERTRACK, INC. __..
SEM REG/V. COPELAND
PAGE 0008
DATE 03/09/89
INV/REF PO # CHK #
_.... _ _ . AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$18.00
00148 001-400-1202-4316 00230 _ $95.00.__
03/07/89 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
CELLULAR DYNAMICS COMPANY
MOBIL PHONE CHCS/JAN 89 78428
02449 001-400-2101-4304
01/31/89 POLICE
$95.00
07360 29342
$0.00 03/09/89
00344 $234.79___178425/178428 00110 29343 .
/TELEPHONE $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
CHAMPION CHEVROLET
FLOOR MAT/PATROL CAR .55331
R CHAMPION CHEVROLET
AL/ON PATROL CAR
R..._ CHAMPION CHEVROLET
MISC CHCS/FEB 89
CHAMPION CHEVROLET
MISC CHGS/FEB 89
CHAMPION CHEVROLET
MISC CHGS/FEB 89
00014 001-400-2101-4311 00623._
02/01/89 POLICE
00014 001-400-2101-4311 00624
19352 01/17/89 POLICE
00014 001-400-2101-4311 00626
02/28/89 POLICE
00014 001-400-4205-4309 00348
02/28/89 EQUIP SERVICE
00014 001-400-4601-4311 00065
02/28/89 COMM RESOURCES
$234.79
$295.64 _______ .__._5533i 07911
/AUTO MAINTENANCE $295.64
$Y72.19
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
$748.11
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
$42.51
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*23.75 __.
/AUTU MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TO)AL*****************************************************xk************* $1.882.20
CHIEF NEON SIGN CO.
POLICE SIGN
32505
02702 001-400-8606-5400 00016
0&/08/89 CIP 86-606
29344
03/09/89
19352 07910 29344
$906.32 03/09/89
00242 29344
$0.00 03/09/89
00212 29344
$0.00 03/09/89
00212 29344
$0.00 03/09/89
$500.55_____ ._31505 07680 29345
/EQUIPMENT
*** VENDOR TOTAL***********Wr**********************#**********s********************
COAST SIGNS & GRAPHICS
ST SIGNS/PUB. WORKS'
$500.55 03/09/89
*500.55
•
00352 001-400-3104-4309 00184. $489.90 ____ _ 75/4. 08109 .___ 29346
7994, 02/23/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 0489./0 03/09/89 '
*** VENDOR TOTAL*;.3`*******************************************************4,;r. «4444*4
R _ CONTINENTAL COMPUTER _ _ 0P622 . 001-400-2101-4305 00928
MEDEM RENTAL/NOV88-MAR89 866 02/27/69 POLICE
3
I 0
' J
$489.90
$1.065.00 . ! _ . 866 07946
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00
29347
03/09/89
1
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOWNAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0009 1
FOR 03/14/89 DATE 03/09/89 i
VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PG * CHK 0
DATE INVC PROJ 0 ' .ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION____________. _AMOUNT UNENC. DATE EXP
1
*** VENDOR TOTAL
01.065.00 _
... _ . R _ THE *COPY SHOP __ ____ _ 00022 001-400-2101-4305_00932_ .$47.92 _ _ 07917
D.A.R.E. NAMETAGS 02/21/89 210004 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $47.92 29348
03/09/89
!
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** __ $47.92 _._
R . CORONA CLAY • _ . 02699 001-400-6101-4309 00635 _ $1,000.00 :__6560 07695 __ 29349
-FIELD CLAY/LITTLE LEAGUE 6560 02/09/89 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $1,000.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $1,000.00 _
___ R , THE*DAILY BREEZE . __ _ _ 00642 001-400-1203-4201 00446.... $324. 80 392205-100 07085 _ 29350
EMPLOYEE ADS .5100 02/28/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $324.20 03/09/89
I _
*** VENDOR TOTAL **************************************************414 -11-*************** . ' . $324.80 I
R DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 02716 001-300-0000-3904 00243 _$142.38
REFUND UMTA OVERPAYMENT _ _ _ .__ .060E7 _ 29351
02/07/89 /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** 0142.38
R DFM ASSOCIATES__ 00726 001-400-1122-4305 00080 _ • $57.09 _000075 04572 _ 29352
ELECTION CODES 00075 02/27/89 ELECTIONS /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $57.35 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** 057.09
....
R BERNARD 8.*DI GIOVANNI 02705 110-300-0000-3302 26022 _ $38.00 _749158_07361 ..29353
CITE PAYMENT REFUND 49158 03/07/89 /COURT FINES/PARK/NG $0.00 03/09/84 i-
.
*** VENDOR TOTAL *********************4********************************************** $38.00 ,
,...
R DIAMOND CUT CORING CO. 02701 105-400-8202-4201 00031 _
_ $560.00. _2048_ 07683 29354
SAWCUT POLE BASES/LIGHT 2049 02/12/89 CIP 85-202 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT- $700.00 03/09/89
•••J
1••
*** VENDOR TOTAL *********************IHFiHHHIAHHHHHHHHHHI-11-111HHHHHI***41-******11.**41.1144H1-11*-11-11, $560.00
DIRECT SAFETY CO.__ _ _ 02703 001-400-2401-4309 00099_ $50. 18 804641001_07839 ___ 29355
BARRICADE TAPE 41001 02/16/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /MAINTENANCE..MATERIALS $54.18 03/09/89
. •
..‘„).; •
•
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0010
FOR 03/14/89 DATE 03/09/89
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER. TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK N
DESCRIPTION _ DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION _.. _._.. .__ AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************•**********************************
•
$50.18
DISCOVERY INN _ 02714 001-400-2101-4312 00845_ $514.80 07939 29356 __
HOTEL/BASIC DISPATCH 02/22/89 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE • POST $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$514.80
R DUN & BRADSTREET ..___ _ 00658 705-400-1209-4316 00006 599.00_.__._.._.._8124828 07089 29357
SEM REG/R. BLACKWOOD 24828 02/14/89 LIABILITY INS /TRAINING
*** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************•********************************* $99.00
$99.00 03/09/89
DUNCAN INDUSTRIES 00122 110-400-3302-4309 00518 $2,239.95 P004742-0 07831 29358
PARKING METER PARTS 742-0 02/22/89 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $2,002.20 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL***********•**•*•****************************************************** $2,239.95
R EASY READER
00181 001-400-1102-4323 00001 $184.50 _ .__ __ _ 0268 04577 29359
PUBLIC NOTICES/FEB 89 0268 Q2/28/89 BILTMORE COMM /PUBLIC NOTICING $0.00 03/09/89
R EASY READER 00181 001-400-1121-4323 00057 $1,097.60 0268 04577 29359
PUBLIC NOTICES/FEB 89 0268. 02/28/89 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING $0.00 03/09/89
00181 001-400-1203-4201 00447 $30.00 ___9033 07006 29359
EMPLOYEE ADVERTISING 9033 02/28/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $30.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,312.10
R EASY READER
R . EQUITABLE INSURANCE CO OF IOWA 00830 001-400-1212-4188 01320 54,159.00 EU04851 07082 29360
ANN PREM/E. DILLER 04851 02/06/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$4.159200
'00
•
$0.00 03/09/89
F. MORTON PITT _.__..00210 001-400-2101-4309_ 00200.__ $138.44 9339/9269 07925 ._ 29361
FINGERPRINT SUPPLIES /9269. 03/03/89 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $136.44 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $138.44
__ FAMILY PRACTICE ASSOCIATES _ ____ . _ 00054 001-400-1203-4320 00240. 540.00 i__ __ 07093 _. _ 29362 _ __.
MED SERV/NOV 88 02/16/89 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS $0.00 03/09/89
I .,
1
•
FINANCE-8FA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
__DESCRIPTION___
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
• FOR 03/14/89
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER. TRN * AMOUNT
DATE . INVC _ PROJ * _ .. 'ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION______
*** VENDOR TOTAL a w*a*********' '*********************u'*******tea*****'a ********
R-_ _ GANDALF DATA, INC.
MODEM MAINT/TO MAY 89 208567-
01432
02/14/89
PAGE 0011
DATE 03/09/89
INV/REF PO * CHK *
UNENC DATE EXP —
$40.00
•
001-400-1206-4201 00517 . 4492.00 __20856 00019
DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************************'n'*****
R _. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY_____
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 —0200
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY _
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 —0200
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY_ .-_,
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 —0200
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
• TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 —0200
•
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY _
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 8.9 —0200
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY___,
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 —0200
00015
02/28/89
00015
03/01/89
00015
02/28/89
00015
03/01/89
00015
02/28/89
00015
03/01/89
00015
02/28/89
00015
03/01/89
00015
02/28/89
00015
03/01/89
00015
02/28/89
00015
03/01/89
001-400-1101-4304 00208 _
CITY COUNCIL
001-400-1101-4304 00209
CITY COUNCIL
001-400-1121-4304 00198
CITY CLERK
001-400-1121-4304 00199
CITY CLERK
001-400-1131-4304 00129
CITY ATTORNEY
001-400-1131-4304 00130
CITY ATTORNEY
001-400-1141-4304 00201
CITY TREASURER
001-400-1141-4304 00202
CITY TREASURER
001-400-1201-4304 00216
CITY MANAGER
001-400-1201-4304 00217
CITY MANAGER
001-400-1202-4304 00221_..
•
FINANCE ADMIN
001-400-1202-4304 00222
FINANCE ADMIN
$492.00
$14.37_ ______
/TELEPHONE
$6.46
/TELEPHONE
441..33
/TELEPHONE
$16.16
/TELEPHONE
$234.24________
/TELEPHONE
$8.08
/TELEPHONE
*31.29 _
/TELEPHONE
$12.93
/TELEPHONE
$37.43____
/TELEPHONE
$18.85
/TELEPHONE
$133.72_
-/TELEPHONE
$54.13
/TELEPHONE
29363
03/09/89
00225 _ 29366
40.00 03/09/89
318-0200 00362 29366
40.00 03/09/89
•
00225 __.29366
29366
$0.00 03/09/89
318-0200 00362 29366
$0.00 03/09/89
00225 29366
40.00 03/09/89
318-0200 00362 29366
40.00 03/09/89
00225 . 29366 _
40.00 03/09/89
318-0200 00362 29366
40.00 03/09/89
1
00225 29366 __.
40.00 03/09/89
318-0200 00362 29366
$0.00 03/09/89
00225 ... 29366
$0.00 03/09/89
318-0200 00362 29366
$0.00 03/09/89
I
_ I
I
1•
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION .
R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 -0200
R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
R._._ GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 -0200
R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 . -0200
R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
R .. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 -0200
R
R
R
R
R
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 -0200
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
• DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 -0200
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 -0230.
R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/89
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER• TRN * AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ * 'ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION _.
00015 001-400-1203-4304 00218
02/28/89 PERSONNEL
00015 001-400-1203-4304 00219 .
03/01/89 PERSONNEL
00015 001-400-1206-4304 00151
02/28/89 DATA PROCESSING
00015 001-400-1206-4304 00152
03/01/89 DATA PROCESSING
00015 001-400-1207-4304 00117
02/28/89 BUS LICENSE
00015 001-400-1207-4304 00118.
03/01/89 BUS LICENSE
00015 001-400-2101-4304 00342
02/28/89 POLICE
00015 001-400-2101-4304 00343 _
03/01/89 POLICE
00015 001-400-2201-4304 00154
02/28/89 FIRE
00015 001-400-2201-4304 00155
03/01/89 FIRE
00015 001-400-2401-4304 00206
02/28/89 ANIMAL CONTROL
00015 001-400-2401-4304 00207.
03/01/89 ANIMAL CONTROL
00015 001-400-4101-4304 00221
02/28/89 PLANNING
00015 ..001-400-4101-4304 00222 _
03/01/89 PLANNING
00015 001-400-4201-4304 00217
02/28/89 BUILDING
PAGE 0012
DATE 03/09/89
INV/REF PO It CHK *
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$51.80
/TELEPHONE
•
421.01._.. __.__ ....._ 318-0200
/TELEPHONE
$243.90
/TELEPHONE
00225 29366
40.00 03/09/89
00362 29366
40.00 03/09/89
00225 29366
40.00 03/09/89
425.05_._..________318-0200 00362 29366
40.00 03/09/89
/TELEPHONE
*47.67
/TELEPHONE
/TELEPHONE
$1,160.08
/TELEPHONE
$326.32
/TELEPHONE
$228.78
/TELEPHONE
48. 08
/TELEPHONE
$29.37
/TELEPHONE
412.93
/TELEPHONE
4101.69
/TELEPHONE
00225 29366
40.00 03/09/89
__ 318-0200 00362 29366
40.00 03/09/89
00225 29366
40.00 03/09/89
318-0200 00302 29366
40.00 03/09/89
00225 29366
40.00 03/09/89
. 318-0200 00362 29366
40.00 03/09/89
00225 29366
40.00 03/09/89
_ 318-0200 00362 29366
40.00 03/09/89
00225 29366
40.00 03/09/89
•
433. 13____._._._._318-0200 _ 00362 .... 29366
/TELEPHONE 40.00 03/09/89
4167.87 00225 • 29366
/TELEPHONE 40.00 03/09/89
1
J
41.
V
•
r
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
_ DESCRIPTION
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/89
PAGE 0013 -1
DATE 03/09/89
VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT INV/REF PO 0 CHK N
_ _. .___.__ _ _ _ . DATE 'NYC. PROJ # ' ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 -0200
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY.__,_.__
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 -0200
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89 •
GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 -0200
R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 -0200
R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
DIRECT IN DIAL/MAR 89 -0200
R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
• TELE CHARGES/FEB 89
00015 001-400-4201-4304 00218 $67.06
03/01/89 BUILDING /TELEPHONE
00015 . _001-400-4202-4304 00222_ $310.27__________
02/28/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE
AMOUNT.UNENC.. DATE EXP ._._
318-0200 00362 29366
$0.00 03/09/89
00015 001-400-4202-4304 00223
03/01/89 PUB WKS ADMIN
00015 001-400-4204-4321 00429
02/28/89 BLDG MAINT
00015 001-400-4601-4304 00251 $225.86
02/28/89 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-4601-4304 00252
03/01/89
00225 29366
$0.00 03/09/89
$75.14 _ _ 318-0200 00362 29366
/TELEPHONE
$20.06 _. _.
/BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT
$16.16_
COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-6101-4304 00131
02/28/89 PARKS
$18.28 .. _
/TELEPHONE
$0.00 03/09/89
00225 29366
$0.00 03/09/89
00225 29366
$0.00 03/09/89
318-0200 00362 _. 29366
$0.00 03/09/89
00015 .001-400-6104-4304 00132 _ $8.08_ ______318-0200
03/01/89 PARKS /TELEPHONE
00015
02/28/89
00015
02/28/89
00015
03/01/89
00015
02/28/89
110-400-3301-4304 00105
$10.32
VEH PKG DIST /TELEPHONE
110-400-3302-4304 00220.. $251.66.
PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE
110-400-3302-4304 00221
PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE
145-400-3401-4304 00026
DIAL A RIDE /TELEPHONE
$87.25
$4.16_
*** VENDOR TOTAL. **a********** ra***************4******naafi*****4*a*** * app *
R GRANT THORNTON
SERV/CERT OF PART. 01505
00742 001-400-1202-4201 00156
01/31/89 FINANCE ADMIN
$4.177-94
00225 29366
$0.00 03/09/89
00362 ._.. 29366
$0.00 03/09/89
00225 29366
$0.00 03/09/89
00225 29366
$0.00 03/09/89
318-0200 00362 29366
$0.00 03/09/89
00225 _. 29366
$0.00 03/09/89
$2.876.38 13251/01505_ 07359 .... 29367
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL****a**a***a*a*a*a**************aaa******a******a**********aaa****aa $2.876.38
GTEL
TELE CHANGES/PERSONNEL 09054��
01340
12/13/88
001-400-1203-4304 00217_ $200.00.____
PERSONNEL */TELEPHONE
189054 06993 _._ 29368 __
$0.00 03/09/89
1
uts
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
_ . __ ...._.DESCRIPTION _._ .___._ _ _ ..
R GTEL
' TELE CHANGES/POLICE , 89054
R GTEL _
MON RENTAL/FEB-MAR 89
• ;
R GTEL
TELE CHANGES/PLANNING
__. R _- _ GTEL --- -_
MON RENTAL/FEB-MAR 89
R GTEL .
TELEPHONE CHCS/BASE 3 89141
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/89
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N
DATE INVC . PROJ * ACCOUNT DES
01340 001-400-2101-4304 00341
12/10/88 POLICE
_ 01340 001-400-2201-4304 _. 00156
03/01/89 FIRE
01340 001-400-4101-4304 00220
09/04/88 PLANNING
_. 01340 _001-400-4601-4304 00253._
03/01/89 COMM RESOURCES
01340 110-400-3302-4304 00219
02/01/89 PARKING ENF
3
PAGE 0014
DATE 03/09/89
AMOUNT INV/REF POM CHK $
CRIPTION ...__._-.__. __.:__.__.AMOUNT UNENC . DATE EXP
$612.11
/TELEPHONE
$216.40...
/TELEPHONE
$229.00
/TELEPHONE
$199.44._
'/TELEPHONE
$96.09
/TELEPHONE
748687/189054 06992 29368
$0.00 03/09/89
1•
00326 29368 .._.
$0.00 03/09/89 1
06196 29368
$0.00 03/09/89
--__________..._ 00326 29368 _.
$0.00 03/09/89
789141 06981 29368
$0.00 03/09/89
.*** VENDOR TOTAL + ****•********a• *prat******•x******* ******** ►*************a*** _ _ $1, 553. 04 _
R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 00731
ELGIN SWEEPER PARTS C9231 11/30/88
_ HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. _._. _ ._ 00731
ELGIN SWEEPER PARTS C9364 12/15/88
001-400-3103-4311 00442 . *20.86 . 1C9231 07285
ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00
001-400-3102-4311 00443 .. $207.96 ____1C9364_07611 _
ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R ICMA 00157 001-400-1202-4316 00232
PUBLICATIONS 03/02/89 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING
$228.82
$32.70
*** VENDOR TOTAL**********.**•*********************.************************************ *32.70
R INGLEWOOD TRANSMISSION
OVERHAUL TRANSMISSION 4034
02095 110-400-3302-4311 00459 $438.00 __
02/08/89 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************
INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC ___. 02458
STREET LIGHT FIXTURES 26621. 02/13/89
$438.00
29369
03/09/89
29369
03/09/89
07350 29370
$0.00 03/09/89
4034 07840 29371
$834.57 03/09/89
105-400-8201-4309 00055__ *873.56 ._ 26621 07267 29372 __
CIP 85-201 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $873.56 03/09/89
VENDOR TOTAL. ********************************************************************
JOBS AVAILABLE
EMPLOYEE ADVERTISING
*873. 56
01165 001-400-1203-4201 00441 $112.32 '89-3-036 07087 . _ 29373
3-036 01/31/89 PERSONNEL ./CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $112.32 03/09/89
J
r •
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/89
PAY VENDOR NAME VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $ AMOUNT
__DESCRIPTION -.DESCRIPTION ___.___ .__...-_.. ._.. . DATE INVC . PROJ M ' ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
R JOBS AVAILABLE
PAGE 0015
DATE 03/09/89
INV/REF PO * CHK *
t_... AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP . _.
-'1
01165 001-400-1203-4201 00443 $44.00 89-4-045 07096
EMPLOYEE ADS 4-045 02/15/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00
•
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***** * ****a*****wa**a*********tea**** ********************* $156.32 __ ._. _ _ _. --
R JONCICH. STURM & ASSOCIATES
29373
03/09/89
02159 001-400-8610-4201 00004 $1.625.92 1046 08116 29374
ARCHITECT SERV/TO NOV 88 1046 12/02/88 CIP 88-610 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
.-*** VENDOR TOTAL. _***********************************************************IF********_..__._._. *1, 625. 92
R LEAGUE.OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
. 00317 001-400-4601-4317 00084 $120.00
REG/A. MASTRIAN-HANDMAN TR240 03/08/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONFERENCE EXPENSE
***-VENDOR TOTAL.******************************************4************* _________ .$120.00.---••—
R PAUL E.*LEWKOWICZ
THEATRE TECH/FEB 18 •
02619 001-400-4601-4201 00290 $65.00
02/22/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0.00 03/09/89
TR240 00240 29375
$0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** _ -- ---$65.00 ---- - -
***
R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE. INC. 00077 001-400-4101-4305 00281
MSC CHCS/FEB 89 02/28/89 PLANNING
LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE. INC._ 00077 001-400-4202-4305 00372
. MISC CHCS/FEB 89 02/28/89 PUB WKS ADMIN
R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE. INC. 00077 150-400-8102-4201 00024
PLANS/SPECS/CIP 85-102 23424 02/03/89 CIP 85-102
$338.45
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$51.44
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
07722 29376
$0.00 03/09/89
00233 29377
$0.00 03/09/89
00233 29377
$0.00 03/09/89
$449.70 223424 07692 29377
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $449.70 03/09/89
VENDOR TOTAL. ******************************************************************** - -- $839.59 ._._
R LOS ANGELES CO CIV SERV COMM. 00869
SERV/D. ALLEN CASE 89-02 02/22/89
LOS ANGELES CO CIV SERV COMM.___ 00869
SERV/CASE NO. 88-293 89-C1 02/09/89
001-400-1203-4251 00106 $2,159.58 • 89-02
PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
001-400-1203-4251 00107 _ $1.469.32 __ 89-01 07094 29378
PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
07098 29378 •
$0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *3.628.90
R._ COUNTY OF *LOS ANGELES
MAP REVISIONS/JAN 89 1054
$0.00 03/09/89
00287 001-400-4101-4305 00282_ $14.30 !...._.._1054.. 06083 29379
02/02/89 PLANNING '/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$0.00 03/09/89 ` 1
4111.
rlr
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:27:55 •
PAY VENDOR NAME
__ DESCRIPTION
^_
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/89
3
PAGE 0016 i
' DATE 03/09/89 '
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK *
DATE INVC. PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION . _.AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL **** ******* *******ta *********************. ****#**************
_R._ LOS ANGELES TIMES .. _. _ _ .
EMPLOYEE ADS
LOS ANGELES TIMES
EMPLOYEE ADS
L____ 00213 001-400-1203-4201 00444._
10715 02/26/89 PERSONNEL
00213 001-400-1203-4201 00445
10715 02/26/89 PERSONNEL
$14.30
$194.37 08-010715
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
07078 29380
$194.34 03/09/89
$924.04 08-010715 07084
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $882.20
*** VENDOR TOTAL_ ****-1F*** *******IF*****************41411 ****-^ --- -$1, 118.4i _ _. _ __
R JAMES P.*LOUGH
. 00938 001-400-1131-4201 00467 $6.185.00
RETAINER/EX LEG/FEB 89 03/01/89 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
r - -*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** — -___$6,185.00__
R MANHATTAN CAR WASH
MISC CHGS/JAN 89
01146 001-400-2101-4311
01/31/89 POLICE
00625 $100.15
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR •TOTAL********************************************************************---. --$100.15 -- -
R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES. INC.
LEASE PMT/MARCH 89
02272 001-400-2101-6900
03/02/89 POLICE
00401 $43.850.75
/LEASE PAYMENTS
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R ALANA*MASTRIAN-HANDMAN
PER DIEM ADVANCE
R ALANA*MASTRIAN-HANDMAN
' MILEAGE ADVANCE
R ALANA*MASTRIAN-HANDMAN
HOTEL DEPOSIT
TR240
TR240
TR240
00219 001-400-4601-4317 00080
03/08/89 COMM RESOURCES
00219 001-400-4601-4317 00081
03/08/89 COMM RESOURCES
00219 001-400-4601-4317 00083
03/08/89 COMM RESOURCES
$43,850.75,-----__-- -__---
$140.00 TR240
/CONFERENCE EXPENSE
$158.40 ...TR240
/CONFERENCE EXPENSE
$95.00 • TR240
/CONFERENCE EXPENSE.-
*** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************************.********. - -. __..$393.40_ ___
MONARCH BROOM
MISC CHCS/FEB 89
29380
03/09/89
06675 29381
$0.00 03/09/89
00136 29382
$0.00 03/09/89
00063 29383
$0.00 03/09/89
00240 29384
$0.00 03/09/89
00240 _ 29384
$0.00 03/09/89
00240 29384
$0.00 03/09/89
00084 001-400-3103-4309 00807 $234.30 6955 00238 ' 29385
$0.00 03/09/89
6955 ' 02/28/89 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
•
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION - - - - --- - -
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/89
PAGE 0017
DATE 03/09/89
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER. TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK *
DATE INVC ... PROJ M _ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ._..__ AMOUNT. UNENC DATE EXP.__
a** VENDOR TOTAL*I************e**********************a****a*aaaaaa* *********t******
•
MONTEREY SHERATON HOTEL
HOTEL ADV/A. MASTRIAN TR240
$234.30
02712 001-400-4601-4317 00082_ $114.00. ___ ......___ TR240 00240 . 29386 __ ..
03/08/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 03/09/89
$114.'00
*** VENDOR TOTAL************************taa*asa*a*a****as***H1****a***a*****a*******
•
MUNICIPAL TOY COMPANY
EASTER EGG HUNT SUPPLIES 89314
01517 001-400-4601-4308 00156 _ $332.00
02/21/89
COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL**************************a*******a.x.****a**a**a***.p.********,p,***,u *** _ $332.00
____ _89314 07716 .__ 29387
$0.00 03/09/89
OMNI OFFICE PRODUCTS __._ 00659 001-400-4101-5401 00007___. . $384.99. _ 959741/146450 06078
46450 . 02/16/89 PLANNING /EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 $383.93
$384.99
DESK/CHAIR
*4* VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************a****a*a********a*a****a***
PACIFIC COAST CABLING _ 02653
COMPUTER CABLE SUPPLIES 1070 01/12/89
R PACIFIC COAST CABLING
02653
COMPUTER•CABLE SUPPLIES 1071. 01/12/89
R PACIFIC COAST CABLING_ 02653
CRIMPING TOOL 1069 01/12/89
R PACIFIC COAST CABLING
TRNG/INSTALLATION/
* * *
02653
1083 01/18/89
1
.1
293
03/09/88
3 09/89 -1
v
001-400-1206-4309 00121 _ $141.86 _1070. 07822 __ 29389
S._ ._
DATA PROCESSING /MAINTENANCE MATERIAL$141.86 03/09/89
001-400-1206-4309 00122 $993.01
DATA PROCESSING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
001-400-1206-4309 00123 $134.19
DATA PROCESSING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
001-400-1206-4316 00073 $150.00
DATA PROCESSING /TRAINING
VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R PEP BOYS
MISC CHCS/FEB 89
00608 001-400-2201-4311
56378 02/28/89 FIRE
$1,419.06
00272 $14.77
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR. TOTAL*********a*aaaa****a********w**aa.r.*********a************,x ********a* .....
R PERVO PAINT CO.
TRAFFIC PAINT
$14.77-__ __
1071 07823 29389
$993.01 03/09/89
1069 07819 . 29389
$134.19 03/09/89
1083 07827 29389
*150.00 03/09/89
56378 00242 29390
$0.00 03/09/89
01316 115-400-8170-4309 00002 $2,524.05 68979/69029 07678
69029 02/21/89 CIP 87-170 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $2,524.05
J
29391
03/09/89
r
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/89
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER, TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # 'ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***** *****************************+rte********************x********
R PETER'S NURSERIES
PLANTS/CITY HALL COURT
PAGE 0018
DATE 03/09/89
INV/REF PO # CHK #
. AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$2.524.05
02367 001-400-8604-4309 00113 $747.94 2153/2084 07270
/2084 02/07/89 CIP 86-604 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $747.94
$747.94
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R KARI*PROPECK
MEALS/BASIC DISPATCH
02713 001-400-2101-4312
02/22/89 POLICE
00844 $325.00
/TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER
TUITION/BAS DISPATCH .
02715 001-400-2101-4312
02/22/89 POLICE
$325. 00
00846 $30.00
/TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST
$30.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO
MISC CHCS/JAN 89
RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO
ACCIDENT SCENE PHOTOS
RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO
MISC CHCS/JAN 89
RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO
MISC CHGS/JAN 89
RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO
MISC CHCS/JAN 89
RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO
MISC CHCS/JAN 89
RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO
MISC CHCS/JAN 89
00173 001-400-1202-4305 00209
01/31/89 FINANCE ADMIN
00173
H5009 02/04/89
00173
01/31/89
00173
01/31/89
00173
01/31/89
001-400-2101-4305 00930
POLICE
001-400-2101-4306 00616
POLICE
001-400-2201-4305 00267
FIRE
001-400-4201-4305 00406
BUILDING
00173 001-400-4204-4309 01251
01/31/89 BLDG MAINT
00173 001-400-4601-4305 00631
01/31/89 COMM RESOURCES
$24.18
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$231.74
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$167.04
/PRISONER MAINTENANCE
$65.25
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$56.53
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$56.00
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$13.02
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$613.76
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES
ENG SERV/PUB. WORKS
29392
03/09/89
07938 29393
$0.00 03/09/89
07940 29394
$0.00 03/09/89
00144 29395
$0.00 03/09/89
H5009 07923 29395
$0.00 03/09/89
00144 29395
$0.00 03/09/89
00144 29395
$0.00 03/09/89
00144 29395
$0.00 03/09/89
00144 29395
$0.00 03/09./89
00144 29395
$0.00 03/09/89
01578 001-400-4202-4201 00244 $425.00 89118 07698
89118 02/01/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00
29396
03/09/89
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0019 •�
FOR 03/14/89 DATE 03/09/89
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER, TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * .�
DATE INVC PROJ * 'ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ____ AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP __
*** VENDOR TOTAL *****a *** *. .a****wx a******** * * **INHHHHHH* ***11t****
•
$425.00
SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY_ _ _ 00021 .001-400-3104-4309 00183.. $540.91 ..__32665 07684 29397 _
STREET BIONS 32665 02/22/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $540.91 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
*540. 91
R _ SCHULTZ ELECTRIC, INC. _ 02418 .001-400-8602-4201 00032 *580.00 ...1082 08102 _ 29398
DISCONNECT COMPUTER FROM 1082 02/21/89 CIP 86-602 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR IVAT $600.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************************,a,********,n, *580.00
SENTINEL SIGNAL SYSTEMS __ __.. __ 01025 _ 001-400-4204-4321 00427.. _ *300. 00 _ 08120 __ 29399
FIRE ALARM SYS/COMM CTR 02/13/89 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT *0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $300.00
•
R . . _ SHELL OIL CO. , ___ . _.. __ _ 00320 001-400-2101-4310 00169_ $132.24 _. _ 0223353 07354 29400
MISC CHCS/JAN 89 23353 02/13/89 POLICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$132.24
JERRY*SH0URDS 02708 001-210-0000-2110 02725 $50.00 72175 07174 29401
ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 72175 03/06/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R ETTA*SIMPSON _
' MON EXP/FEB 89
$50.00
01961 001-400-1101-4317 00304 $17.00 06674 29402
03/02/89 CITY COUNCIL /CONFERENCE EXPENSE
*** VENDOR TOTAL*********************a***********************************************
R SINCLAIR PAINT CO.
MISC CHGB/FEB 89
*17.00
$0.00 03/09/89
A
01399 001-400-4204-4309 01252._ $152.51 __._00246 _ 29403
01/31/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS _ $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$152.51
v
•../
r
yr
SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY__00114 001-400-1101-4305 00233 , $89.35 _ _.00247 29404
I
MISC CHCS/FEB 89 02/28/89. CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 03/09/89'
a
a
a
r
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
.DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0020
FOR 03/14/89 DATE 03/09/89
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER, TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION .._____.._. • AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL ****•*******************ra*******air* ********************* * $89.35
R _ JOEL T.*SMITH_ ... 02707 001-210-0000-2110 02726 $50.00 72156 07175 29405
ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 72156 03/06/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL *************************************************** x.*****.x.*****.x,. .x,** $50.00
R__ SOURISSEAU SECURITY SYS, INC.___ 02075 001-400-2101-4201 00358 $300.00 .1222 07933 29406
BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION 1222 02/16/89 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
*300.00
SOUTH BAY CITIES ASSOCIATION.__.._.. 00341 001-400-1101-4317 00305_ $15.00 .. 06673 29407
DINNER MTG/J. WILLIAMS . 03/03/89 CITY COUNCIL /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$15. 00
__. SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 110-300-0000-3302 26019 $9,360.00 073*8 29408
CITE SURCHARGE/FEB 89 02/28/89 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$9.360. 00
SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00400 110-300-0000-3302 26020 $248.00 07863 29409
CITATION COURT BAIL 03/02/89 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 03/09/89 •
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$248. 00
R SOUTH BAY VINEYARD CHRISTIAN _... 02709 001-210-0000-2110 02727 $100.00 69942 _ 07172 29410
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 69942 03/06/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100.00
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO.
GAS BILLS/FEB 89
00170 001-400-4204-4303 00294.. $2,091.89.
02/28/89 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$2.091.89
_____ 00253 ._ 29411
$0.00 03/09/89
SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO _00115 001-400-3103-4201 00212 _ $2,375.10 1_2342 00029 .. 29412
SWEEP SERV/FEB 89 2342 02/22/89 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/09/89
•
MIN
J
Oft
J
.11
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
_ ..._ ._..DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 03/14/89
PAGE 0021
i
DATE 03/09/89
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO it CHK # r
.DATE INVC _ PROJ # 'ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION __:__-._ AMOUNT_UNENC DATE EXP
R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 110-400-3301-4201 00202 *2.902.90
SWEEP SERV/FEB 89 2342 02/22/89 VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
2342 00029 29412
$0.00 03/09/89
-- *** VENDOR TOTAL********w*******wH►****t*************tet************** ******• *• *.* - --•---35.278. 00 -- -- ___ _ _..... .
R STARLITE-BLINKERLITE SUPPLY 00546 115-400-8165-4201 00014 . $222.00 97470/96764 06768
BARRICADE RENTAL 96764 02/27/89 CIP 87-165 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $240.00
***_ VENDOR _TOTAL********************************************************************_._ -- ___$222,00_______ .
R JANE*SULLIVAN
02710 001-210-0000-2110 02728 $100.00 69915 07171 29414
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 69915 03/06/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL*************r*********************. ,p•, ******************************* _ _ __ . _$100. 00__ . _
• R SUPERIOR MEDICAL EGUTPMENT 00425 001-400-2201-4309 00646 $21.00 73743 00255 29415
MISC CHCS/FEB 89 73743 02/28/89 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/09/89
_...*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** -----. _____ .$21.00 -----
29413
03/09/89
R TENNANT COMPANY 00307 001-400-3103-4311 00444 $343.26
STREET SWEEPER PARTS 67-00 02/03/89 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL
***
295067-00 07662 29416
$343.25 03/09/89
************************************IHHHHH *************************
_. _... ' *343.26 -- .
R TIME BUSINESS FORMS
JOB BULLETIN PRINTING 40900 01516 -430502/28/89 001-400-120 PERSONNEL 0200 /OFFICE$197OPERO3 SUPPLIES
TIME BUSINESS FORMS
PRINT SERV/BUILDING
01516 • 001-400-4201-4305 00405
40039 01/17/89 BUILDING
$211.94 _
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$408.97
VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
TODD PIPE & SUPPLY
MISC CHGS/FEB 89
TODD PIPE & SUPPLY
MISC CHCS/FEB 89
00124
02/28/89
00124
02/28/89
001-400-6101-4309 00653
PARKS
•
160-400-3102-4309 00352
/ SEWER/ST DRAIN
•
40900 07083 29417
$197.03 03/09/89
40039 07504 29417 ._
*210.87 03/09/89
•
J
J
$61.08 _. _.00257. _. 29418
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS--__ $0.00 03/09/89 ~ i
00257 29418
$0.00 03/09/89
$189.77
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
y
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
a PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
ti
11
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST •
• FOR 03/14/89
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ M 'ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL ****** ►**a n** **** *xr* * ** **+r****tea************
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC CHCS/FEB 89
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC CHCS/FEB 89
_ R . TRIANGLE HARDWARE_ _
MISC CHCS/FEB 89
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC CHCS/FEB 89
TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC CHCS/FEB 89
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC CHCS/FEB 89
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE __
MISC CHCS/FEB 89
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC CHG$$/FEB 89
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC CHCS/FEB 89
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC.CHGS/FEB 89
00123 001-400-1101-4305 00232
02/28/89 CITY COUNCIL
00123 001-400-2201-4309 00645
02/28/89 FIRE
00123 001-400-2401-4309 00100.
02/28/89 ANIMAL CONTROL
00123 001-400-3103-4309 00806
02/28/89 ST MAINTENANCE
,_. 00123
02/28/89
001-400-3104-4309 00186.
TRAFFIC SAFETY
00123 001-400-4204-4309 01253
02/28/89 BLDG MAINT
00123 001-400-6101-4309 00654
02/28/89 PARKS
00123 105-400-2601-4309 00455
02/28/89
STREET LIGHTING
00123 110-400-3302-4309 00519
02/28/89 PARKING ENF
00123 160-400-3102-4309 00353
02/28/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN
PAGE 0022
DATE 03/09/89
INV/REF PO N CHK M
- — AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*250. 85
*4. 78
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
*7. 66
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*1.72
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*46. 12
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*40.45
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*552. 65
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$120.32
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*58. 00
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$13.72
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*56.37
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
_ *901.79 _
00258 29419
*0.00 03/09/89
00258 29419
*0.00 03/09/89
00258 29419
*0.00 03/09/89
00258 29419
*0.00 03/09/89
00258 29419
*0.00 03/09/89
00258 29419
*0.00 '03/09/89
00258 _ 29419
*0.00 03/09/89
00258 29419
*0.00 03/09/89
00258 29419
*0.00 03/09/89
00258 29419
*0.00 03/09/89
R UARCO, INCORPORATED 00126 110-400-3302-4305 00541 *1.843.12 • 430646 06976 29420
PARKING CITES 30646 02/27/89 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES.
*** VENDOR TOTAL ************************.eta.********,it**,M***********,K,****************** _101.843.12
R ULTRASYSTEMS
CONTRACT SERV/PLANNING
01331 001-202-0000-2020 00782 *1.705.00
06/30/88 / /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
*1.786. 35 03/09/89
06030 29421
*0.00 03/09/89
Y
•
•
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
_ _. .DESCRIPTION
t.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0023
FOR 03/14/89 DATE 03/09/89
OND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO N CHK *
DATE INVC _._ ... PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC .. DATE EXP.._ ._____
*4* VENDOR TOTAL ******** **a*c** **w4** **************************+*+ .******
$1,705.00
R _ _ FRANK P. *UNZUETA, _ • 02711 .001-210-0000-2110 _ 02729. _. $500.00 __.69907. 07170 29422
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 69907 03/06/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$500.00
_ R MICHELE*VAN HESSEN _ _. • _ 02706 001-210-0000-2110 02730 _ $100.00 _. 69943 07173 29423
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 69943 03/06/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 03/09/89
114* VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100.00
J
VANIER GRAPHICS 01302 001-400-1206-4305 00366 $930.40 33403/32893 07829 29424
COMPUTER PAPER/CITY OFF.. 32893 01/30/89 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $930.38 03/09/89
J
$930.40
*** VENDOR TOTAL.********************************************************************
J
VERNON PAVING COMPANY__ 00019 160-400-3102-4309 00351 $174.93 . 33253 00260 29425
MISC CHCS/FEB 89 33253 02/28/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR-TOTAL********************************************************************
THE*WALL STREET JOURNAL
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$174.93
00465 001-400-1202-4316 00231 $129.00..._. .. 07356 29426
03/02/89 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING
***.VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************************.,**.x.** $129.00
$0.00 . 03/09/89
WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY _ 00141 001-400-1131-4201 00466 $399.19 652-893-746 04579 29427
PUBLICATIONS 3-746 03/02/89 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$399.19
WEST -LITE SUPPLY CO.___. 60833 001-400-4204-4309 01249 .. $323.59 71228/70802. 07657 29428
LAMPS/CITY BUILDINGS 70802 02/07/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $323.59 03/09/89
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$323.59
__ WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE__ __ _.._^_01152 _ 001-400-1203-4201 00442 . $312.00 ' ___.9601_ . 07095 _..... 29429 _,
EMPLOYEE ADS 9601 02/10/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/09/89
Nal
J
J
r
V
3
V
V
ee
s
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:27:55
PAY VENDOR NAME
. _DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST '
FOR 03/14/89
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION _ __.._. •._ AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
PAGE 0024
DATE 03/09/89
INV/REF PO N CHK N
*** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************************* *************Hr****
•
R XEROX CORPORATION
LEASE PMT/MARCH 89
96311
R XEROX CORPORATION
LEASE PMT/MARCH 89 96312
R XEROX CORPORATION
LEASE PMT/MARCH 89 95800
R XEROX CORPORATION
LEASE PMT/MARCH 89 96308
R XEROX CORPORATION
LEASE PMT/MARCH 89 96309
R XEROX CORPORATION
LEASE PMT/MARCH 89 96310
00135 001-400-1208-6900 00143.
03/02/89 GEN APPROP /LEASE
00135 001-400-1208-6900 00144
03/02/89 GEN APPROP /LEASE
00135 001-400-1208-6900 00145
03/02/89 GEN APPROP /LEASE
00135 001-400-2201-6900 00067
03/02/89 FIRE /LEASE
00135 001-400-2401-6900 00032
03/02/89
00135
03/02/89
XEROX CORPORATION 00135
LEASE PMT/MARCH 89 96309 ()3/02/89
ANIMAL CONTROL /LEASE
001-400-4601-6900 00033
COMM RESOURCES /LEASE
110-400-3302-6900 00115.
PARKING ENF /LEASE
*** VENDOR TOTAL**********************►********•****************ter*************. *****
*** PAY CODE TOTAL******************************************************************
*** TOTAL WARRANTS******************************************************************
$312.00
$238.16
PAYMENTS
$321.08
PAYMENTS
$943.72 ___
PAYMENTS
$47.62 _
PAYMENTS
$56.15 . ___
PAYMENTS
$189.21
PAYMENTS
$114. 00 ... _.._
PAYMENTS
$1.909.94
$159.298.56 _
$272.975.01
521496311 00050 29430
$0.00 03/09/89
521496312 00049 29430
$0.00 03/09/89
521495800 .00048 29430
$0.00 03/09/89
521496308 00053 29430
$0.00 03/09/89
521496309 00051 29430
$0.00 03/09/89
521496310 00052 29430
$0.00 '03/09/89
521496309 00051 29430
$0.00 03/09/89
.1
.0
I HEREBY CERTIFY -THAT THE DEMANDS OR LAMAS COVERED BY
THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PA ES//..Tp.g). CLUSIVE OF THE
WARRANT REGISTER FOR t. ----ARE ACCURATE
AND FUNDS ARE AV I BLE FOR PAYMENT THEREOF:
BY [/ �!' C 1
FINANCE ADMINIS ATOR
DATF
1
.0
I.'4►
d
mit
March 1, 1989
Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of
Members of the City Council March 14, 1989
CANCELLATION OF WARRANTS
Please consider the following request for cancellation of the
warrants listed below.
#028832 - 1/24/89 - William Vincent - $332.25 - Account Number
001-400-2101-4312. Officer did not attend course.
#028807 - 1/24/89 - Sacramento Inn - $580.00 - Account Number
001-400-2101-4312. Officer did not attend course.
#028774 - 1/24/89 - Hyatt Regency Monterey - $196.00 - Account
Number 001-400-1201-4317. A different hotel was used.
#022440 - 2/10/87 - State of California Department of Justice
Accounting Services - $70.00 - Account Number 001-400-2101-4251.
Warrant never received. Payment stopped.
Concur:
evin Northcra
City Manager
Gary :rutsch )92-4t."--1€-&
-
City Treasurer
Noted for fiscal impact
Viki Copeland
March 7, 1989
City Council Meeting
March 14, 1989
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
ORDINANCE NO. 89-975 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, DELETING A PORTION OF SECTION 551 OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE REGARDING ZERO SIDE YARD SETBACK WITHIN R -2B ZONES AND
AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 89-975 relating to the
above subject.
At the meeting of February 28, 1989, this ordinance was
introduced by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Williams, Mayor Rosenberger
None
None
None
Respectfully submitted,
Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk
Concur:
ievin B. N
orthpraft, City Manager
ORDINANCE NO. 89-975
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DELETING A
2 PORTION OF SECTION 551 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING ZERO
SIDE YARD SETBACKS WITHIN R -2B ZONES AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL
3'NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 . --Ze e s e. yard_sethacks work well for new subdivisions, not
14 f-19t--l-o-ts previously developed; 0/1
15 D. This Ordinance will bring side yard setbacks into consistency
16 for all residential zones;
17
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does
18 hereby ordian as follows:
191i 1. Delete the following paragraph of Section 551 regarding side
yards for R -2B zones:
20
"Exception: with the recorded agreement of the owners of
21 adjoining property and provided no violation of the Building
Code will result, one (1) side yard may be reduced to zero
22 (0) feet where the remaining side yard is at least five feet
in width."
23
2. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a
24 completed building permit package of file with the City prior
to February 28, 1989. Said package must include a completed
25 building permit application form, completed conceptual plans
26 (plot plan, floor plans, elevation plans and similar plans)
and a lot survey. Projects that have submitted a completed
building permit package must pursue their application in a
27 diligent manner and must be issued a building permit within
six months of the effective date of this Ordinance.
28
WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing on February
28, 1989, and made the following Findings:
A. Section 551 of the Zoning Ordinance includes an exception
which allows for a dwelling in a R -2B zone to be constructed
to the side yard property line when an agreement is obtained
from the adjacent neighor;
B. All other residential zones do not provide for any exception
to a minimum side yard equal to 10% of the width of the lot,
with a three foot minimum, and five foot maximum;
3. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force
and effect from and after thirty (30) days after it's final
1 passage and adoption.
2
.3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
4
15
16
1
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date
of it's adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance
to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of
general circulation published and circulated in the City of
Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law.
5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of
this Ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original
Ordinances of said City, and shall make minutes of the
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the
proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed
and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1989.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
PPROVED
/perszero
ORM:
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
1. Location
a. Address:
R -2B zones
b. Legal:
2. Description
Text amendment to eliminate zero lot line in R -2B zone
3. Sponsor
a. Name: City of Hermosa Beach, Planning Department
b. Mailing Address: 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach( CA 90254
Phone: (213) 318-0242
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
In accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City of Hermosa beach, which iir
plements the California Environmental quality Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach,
the Environmental Review Committee must make an environmental review of all
private projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planning
Commission must make an environmental review of all public projects proposes
to be undertaken within the City, which are subject to the Environmental
quality Act. This declaration is documentation of the review and, if it be-
comes final, no comprehensive Enviromnental Impact Report is required for
this project.
FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
.We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this prc
. posed project in accordance with Resc'lution 79-4309 of the City Council of
Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive
Environmental Impact Report because, - '--- - -
ures arc ine144o4 in the Droiect, it would not have a significant effect on
the environment. Documentation supp}s finding is on file in the
Building Department.
12-8-88
Date of Finding
Chairnvir• natal Review Committee
FINDING OF THE PLANNING.COMMISSION
We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro-
ject in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa
Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environ-
mental Impact Report because, •- •- _ _ e
included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on the en-
vironment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Build-
ing Department.
Date of Finding
• Chairan, Planning Commission
•
FINDING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
We have undertaken and completed an environmental Impact Review of this pro•
posed project in accordance with Resolution 70-4309 of the City Council of
Hermosa Beach, and find this project does not require a comprehensive En-
vironmental Impact Report because, provided the attacked mitigation meas-
ures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on
the environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the
Building Department.
Date of Finding
Mayor, Hermosa Beach City Council
March 2, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council March 14, 1989
TRACT 30896
THE GRADING PLAN FOR AN EIGHT LOT SUBDIVISION
COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE POWER STREET GRADING PLAN
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council continue this matter until
the developer's engineering has been satisfactorily completed and
reviewed by the city.
Background:
On February 14, 1989 due to the late hour and an illness of the
Public Works Director, City Council rescheduled the Power Street
matter to 6 PM on February 21, 1989. On February 21, 1989 the
Public Works Director recommended a continuance until the regular
Council Meeting of March 14, 1989 so that engineering concerns
could be resolved.
Analysis:
The analysis is divided as follows:
1. The History of the Development
2. The Error in the Survey Prepared by the Developer
3. Time Limit
4. Other Concerns
1. The History of the Development
A revised grading plan was first considered by City Council on
March 24, 1987. On January 26, 1988 the developer again asked
for a revision to the grading plan. Attachment No.1 is a
chronology of this subdivision.
2. The Error in the Survey Prepared by the Developer
Recently a resident raised a concern that the topographic survey
and the hydrology report were wrong. Specifically, that the top
of slope was not correctly shown on the plans submitted to the
City. Getting a topographic survey was the first order of
business for the developer's engineer. This survey was prepared
on August 19, 1986 by a surveyor (licensed by the State)
employeed by the developer. 'A correct topographic survey is a
must to prepare a correct hydrology report.
5
On Tuesday February 28, 1989 Public Works staff and I met with
the developer's engineer (Westco) to review the topographic
survey. After walking the area (from top to bottom) the
developer's engineer agreed the survey was wrong and additional
survey work is necessary as the drainage area is actually larger
than that shown on the submitted plans. All hydrology work and
previous decisions were based on this wrong survey prepared and
submitted by the developer. The error affects the grading plan.
Because of the error additional checking of the developer's
engineering is necessary.
3. Time Limit
According to the Planning Director, the tentative tract map will
expire on April 15, 1989. The developer can request, in writing,
a sixty day extension for appealing the expiration date beyond
April 15, 1989- this is a mandatory extension, not subject to
Council approval.
4. Other Concerns
4a) According to the Planning Director, the lot lines shown on
the approved tentative map are different than the lot lines shown
on the grading plan submitted by the developer.
Alternatives:
Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City
Council are:
1. Refer the revised engineering to the Planning Commission
for review because their last recommendation to the City
Council was based on wrong information.
Res•ectfully submitted,
Antony Antic
Director of
lic Works
Attachments: Attachment No. 1
Concur:
%J7,v,
-Nevin B. Nort raft
C'ty Manager
cc: Bill Grove, Building & Safety Director
James P. Lough, City Attorney
Westco Engineering
Jim Marquez
Hermosa Villa Homes
Mi ael'S h bac
Director of Planning
ATTACHMENT 1.
SUBDIVISION CHRONOLOGICAL
Listed below is the chronological of memoranda to City Council
and subsequent actions:
December 18, 1985: Letter from Mark J. Kavanaugh, Kavanaugh
Development Co., Inc. requesting the vacation of a portion of
Powers and 20th Street.
January 14, 1986: Public Works Department memorandum to City.
Council titled "Request for Street Vacation -Power Street. Two
resolutions were adopted as follows:
Resolution No. 86-4901 establishing a policy on citizen initiated
requests for vacation of public right-of-way, and
Resolution No. 86-4902 directing the Planning Commission to
review the proposed vacation and prepare a recommendation to City
'Council on this matter.
April 15, 1986: Planning Commission approves tentative tract
30986 for eight lot subdivision.
May 27, 1986: Appealed to City Council - approved on appeal
Resolution No. 86-4941 with amendment to allow curb cuts on east
side of the street.
May 27, 1986: Memorandum to City Council from the Public Works
Department titled, "Resolution to Set a Public Hearing to
Consider the Vacation of Portions of Power and 20th Streets in
Conjunction with an Eight Lot Subdivision". Action: To continue
to June 10, 1986.
June 10, 1986: Memorandum to City Council from the Public Works
Department titled "Power and 20th Street Vacations". (May 27,
1986 memorandum above was an attachment to this item). Action to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 86-4945, A Resolution of the City
Council declaring its intention to order the vacation of portions
of Power Street and 20th Street.
2. Set July 22, 1986 as the date for a public hearing.
July 22, 1986: Public Hearing.at the regularly scheduled Council
meeting. Memorandum from Planning Department, titled, "General
Plan Amendments". Action: To approve staff recommendation
1. Resolution No. 86 -4964 --Allow a minimum of 1 dwelling unit
per legal lot, and
1
2. Resolution No. 86-4965 and adopt amendment to Circulation
Element of General Plan --Delete portions of Power and 20th
Street and relocate a portion of Power Street (approximately 95
feet to the east of the currently unimproved right-of-way) in
conjunction with an 8 -unit subdivision.
July 22, 1986: Public Hearing at the regularly scheduled Council
meeting. Memorandum from the Public Works Department, titled,
"Vacation of Portions of Power Street and 20th Street".
Action to approve staff recommendation which:
1. Adopted Resolution No.
portions of Power and 20th
contemplated by Resolution
10, 1986, and
86-4966 ordering the vacation of
Streets as herein described and as
No. 86-4945 adopted by Council on June
2. Authorized the Mayor to sign a statement of negative
declaration.
February 10, 1987: Memorandum to City Council from the Planning
Department titled "Environmental Assessment for Dwelling Unit
Layout & Grading Plans for an Approved Eight Lot Subdivision at
532, 534-540 Twentieth Street as a Required Mitigation Measure
`for a Negative Declaration". Council action: Council requested
that a revised grading plan consistent with tentative map or
modified in some other fashion indicating other options. Adopt
Resolution No. 87-5015. See attached 2/10/87 minutes.
March 24, 1987: Memorandum to City Council from the Planning
Department titled "Revised Grading Plan for 8 -lot Subdivision at
532, 534-540 Twentieth Street". Action to approve staff
recommendation as folows:
1. All lot 5 retaining walls parallel to Power Street will be
located a minimum of 45 feet from the front property line;
2. The small terraced areas located in the northwest corner of
lots 6 & 7 shall be landscaped in a manner to as to minimize the
visual impact of the retaining walls;
3. The soils report prepared for the project shall be amended to
address the revised grading plan.
4. To adopt Resolution No. 87-5056 - A Resolutio of the City of
Hermosa Beach, Approving the Grading Plan for an Eight Lot
Subdivision Located at 532, 534-540 Twentieth Street.
December 15, 1987:
Department titled,
Accommodate Street
Council Action was
Memorandum to Council from the Public Works
"Approval of Grading Plan Revision to
Improvements 532, 534-540 Twentieth Street".
to refer back to staff.
January 26, 1988: Memorandum to City Council from James P.
Lough, City Attorney, titled "Approval of Grading Plan Revision
to accommodate Street Improvements at 532, 534-540/20th Street".
Action was to •approve staff recommendation as amended:
1. In approving the revision, the Public Works Director will be
delegated the authority to meet with the engineers for the
developer and County to approve corrections assuming that the
grading plan meets all the necessary engineering requirements.
The plan is to be referred back to City Council for final
approval after review by the City Attorney.
March 22, 1988: Memorandum to City Council from the Public Works
Department, titled "Status Report on Grading and Drainage for
Tentative Tract #30986 located at 20th Street and Power Street",
with recommendation to receive and file.
April 5, 1988: Planning Commission approved one year extension
of tentative map.
October 25, 1988 (continued from 10/11/88): Memorandum to City
Council from the Public Works Department, Approval of Hydrology
Report and Grading Plan for an Eight Lot Subdivision..." Action:
Item withdrawn.
December 13, 1988: Memorandum to City Council from the Public
'Works Department titled, "Power Street Grading Plan". Action:
Refer this matter to the Planning Commission. Authority for this
decision is found in the Government Code -Subdivision Map Act.
The Planning Commission is the designated body charged with the
duty of making investigations and reports on design (Section
66415). Design means, among other things, drainage and grading
(Section 66418).
February 14, 1989: Memorandum to City Council from Planning
Department, titled, "Special Study 88-25 - - Review of Grading
Plan for Power Street Subdivision, Tract No. 30986. Action: To
continue to an adjourned meeting 6 PM on Tuesday, February 21,
1989.
February 21, 1989 (continued from 2/14/89): Action: To continue
this to 1st meeting in March (2/14/89) and to place this matter
before the public hearings on the agenda),
3
(d)
Vote•on Substitute Motion (Main Motion)
Motion DeBellis, second Cioffi.
AYE - DeBellis, Rosenberger, Simpson, Williams, Mayo
NOES None Ciof,fi
A RESOLU ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ERMOSA
BEACH, CAL ORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDED CONDI ONAL USE
PERMIT FOR A ROPOSED EXPANSION TO AN EXIST G CHURCH AT
2420 PACIFIC C QST HIGHWAY, A PARKING PLA FOR OFF-SITE
PARKING, AND A N .ATIVE DECLARATION. F adoption.
Action: To adopt Re elution No. 87 013 entitled "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OUNCIL OF HE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPRO+ NG AN MENDED CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR A PROPOSED EXPATO AN EXISTING CHURCH AT
2420 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, PARKING PLAN FOR OFF-SITE
PARKING, AND A NEGATIVE DECLARION."
Motion Rosenberger, sec•4 Willi -tqs, So ordered, noting
the objection of Coun lmember DeBlis.
(e) A RESOLUTION OF T CITY COUNCIL OF TH CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORN •, DENYING ON APPEAL A REQUEST FOR A
VARIANCE TO E AND INTO THE REQUIRED REARS.gTBACK AT
2420 PACIFI COAST HIGHWAY, HOPE CHAPEL. For'\adoption.
Action. o adopt Resolution No. 87-5014 entitled, "A
RES U'ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEAC , CALIFORNIA, DENYING ON APPEAL A REQUEST FOR A'\
V IANCE TO EXPAND INTO THE REQUIRED REAR SETBACK AT \
20 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, HOPE CHAPEL.
Motion Rosenberger, second Simpson. So ordered.
(f) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE GRADING PLAN, BUILDING
LAYOUT PLAN, AND LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR AN EIGHT LOT SUB-
DIVISION LOCATED AT 532, 534-540 TWENTIETH STREET SUB-
JECT TO CONDITIONS. For adoption. Memorandum from Plan-
ning Director Michael Schubach dated February 3, 1987.
Speaking to Council regarding this item were:
Jack Belasco 708- 8th Street, Man. Bch. - in opposition
Vicki Garcia - 1835 Valley Park Avenue - in opposition
Gordon Evans - 1769 Valley Park Avenue - in opposition
Warren Lombardi - 1849 Valley Park Avenue -in opposition
Clifford Fritch - 1823 Valley Park Avenue -in opposition
Betty Evans - 1769 Valley Park Avenue - in opposition
Proposed Action: To adopt Resolution No. 87-5015 enti-
tled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE GRADING PLAN,
BUILDING LAYOUT PLAN, AND LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR AN EIGHT
LOT SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 532, 534-540 TWENTIETH STREET
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS."
Motion Mayor Cioffi - dies for lack of second
•
- - Minutes 2-10-87
(g)
Proposed Action: Request developer to present another
grading plan that shows the wall not higher than 4 feet,
or what was indicated to us the•wall would be when we
approved the subdivision.
Motion Williams, second Simpson.
Addressing questions of the Council at this time Mark
Kavanaugh, Kavanaugh Development 2200 Pacific Coast Hwy.
Hermosa Beach, subject project developer.
Substitute Motion: To approve the building layout and
landscape plans as submitted in the staff report, with
the revised landscape plan to be submitted as in the
resolution.
Motion Rosenberger, second Simpson.
Amendment to Motion: To adopt Resolution No. 87-5015
entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE BUILDING
LAYOUT PLAN, AND LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR AN EIGHT LOT SUB-
DIVISION LOCATED AT 532, 534-540 TWENTIETH STREET SUB-
JECT TO CONDITIONS.", amended to remove reference to
grading plan and adding a subsection "B" to No. 2 that
states "Placement of additional specimen trees on lots
where possible."
Vote to Make Amended Substitute Motion Main Motion
AYES - DeBellis, Rosenberger, Simpson, Mayor Cioffi
NOES - Williams
Action: To approve the building layout and landscape
plans as submitted in the staff report, with the revised
landscape plan to be submitted as in the resolution. To
adopt Resolution No. 87-5015 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFOR-
NIA, APPROVING THE BUILDING LAYOUT PLAN, AND.LANDSCAPE
PLAN FOR AN EIGHT LOT SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 532, 534-
540 TWENTIETH STREET SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS.", amended to
remove reference to grading plan, and adding subsection
"B" to No. 2 that states "Placement of additional speci-
men trees on lots where possible."
Motion Rosenberger, second Simpson.
AYES - DeBellis, Rosenberger, Simpson, Mayor Cioffi
NOES - Williams
Further Action: Developer to bring in revised grading
plan consistent with tentative map or modified in some
other fashion indicating other options.
Motion Rosenberger,•second DeBellis. So ordered.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
IA, REPEALING MUNICIPAL CODE•SECTiON 21-3
E AND_._BROAD-LANGUAGE THAT REN -
full reading and
es P.
BEACH,
AS A RESULT OF 0
DERS IT UNENFORCEABLE_.-- For wa
introduction. --Memorandum from City Attor
Lough -dated February 4, 1987.
_ 4 MinutPg v -in -o -i
February 28, 1989
City o f21ermosarl3eaclL,�
Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254.3885
Jim Marquez
1334 Parkview Avenue, Suite 100
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Subject: Response to your letter dated February 27, 1989
Tract No. 30986, Commonly Known as Power Street
Dear Mr. Marquez:
On Monday February 27„1989 I received your letter and after
reading it I do not agree with all your statements. There were
no "slippages" by the City of Hermosa Beach.
1. I will foliowup on your claim that the city did not authorize
the County of Los Angeles to perform plan check.
2. On Thursday February 23, 1989 Westco delivered to the Public
Works Department materials relative to the tract. The materials
were titled by Westco as follows:
- 3 copies of the preliminary (conceptual) grading plan approved
by city council
- 3 copies of topographic survey showing the location of top of
slope,
- 3 hydrology
- 3 copies of
- 3 copies of
6/1/88,
- 3 copies of
- 3 copies of
calculations approved by BSI on 9/13/88,
final grading plan approved by BSI on 9/13/88,
mainline sewer plan approved by the County on
the street improvement plan, and
the storm drain plan.
SUPPLE ENTAL
INFORMATION
5
Page 2 of 3
On Thursday February 23, 1989 I spoke to you over telephone
twice. First, to let you know that I was in receipt of the
materials provided by Westco and that Mr Mike Saruwatari at the
County would like a complete set of plans before any meeting to
discuss the tract. I said someone in the department would
separate the materials supplied by Westco into a set for delivery
to the LA County Public Works Offices. You volunteered to have
your messenger pick up from the Public Works Office•a package of
the plans and calculations and deliver them to the LA County
Offices on Friday morning. Close to 5 o'clock I telephoned your
office, a second time, to let you know that your messenger had
not arrived. You didn't sound too concerned. I said I would
leave the package at the Police Department for pickup if your
messenger arrived after city offices were closed at 6 PM. At no
time during our discussions did I promise to provide two set, nor
did you indicate that two sets or that anything was to be
delivered to BSI. The Public Works Department would have
provided two sets had you communicated that request in either of
our two telephone conversations. Do you want me to return another
set to your office so that your messenger can forward it to BSI?
On February 28, 1989 I telephoned your office and told you that
you had never requested two sets of plans; you had requested only
one set. You responded by saying you remember saying two sets
and I insisted it was only one set. Jim, I am concerned when
you can't remember things and then make such a deal about it?
Why do you think you received only one set? If you wanted two
set all you had to do was ask.
3. All materials (as submitted by the developer and on file in
the Public Work Department)in relation to the grading and
hydrology report were presented to city council. The hydrology
report provided by the developer and on file in the Public Works
Department is dated March 9, 1988. However, the most recent
hydrology report is dated September 13, 1988. Why was the
revised report not submitted earlier to the Public Works
Department?
Page 3 of 3
I do not agree with your assertion that the public works files
were incomplete. The public works department files contained all
information as supplied by the developer. Mr. Lombardi's most
recent letter is dated February 14, 89. In your letter you
state:
" The absence of these materials from Mr Lombardi's
review obviously led to the various inaccurate statements
which are set forth in his most recent letter to the
Council. "
So that this matter may be put to rest, please provide in writing
those statement you feel are inaccurate in Mr. Lombardi's letter.
Cordially,
AAA
Anthony Antic
Director of P blic Works
Attachments: Mr. Lombardi's letter dated February 14, 1989
Memo dated February 28, 1989 from Bill Grove,
Building & Safety Director
Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting 14 February 1989, Agenda Item 8.,
Review of a Grading Plan for Power Street Subdivision, Tract No.
30986. Page 1 of 3
Honorable Mayor, Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council, City
Manager, City Attorney, Planning Director and Building Director:
On 25 January 1989, the local residents submitted a letter requesting
an appeal of the Planning Commissions recommendation to approve the
grading plan of the Power Street subdivision. The City Attorney
stated the the matter was not appealable.
Since the Planning Commission meeting of 17 January 1989, I have
spent considerable time researching the the issue, and would like to
make the following points:
1. Item 2 of Resolution No. 89-5223, requesting that the Planning
Commission review the Power Street grading stated "In approving
the preliminary grading plan, the land would have to remain at
the same existing grade of the easterly adjoining lots." The
Planning Commission REFUSED TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE.
2. The hydrology report by Harris and Associates showed that all of
the lots on Valley Park Avenue slope 50% to the front and 50% to
the rear. After reviewing the Westco Engineering plans, it is
obvious that this is not true. The majority of the lots slope to
the rear. This should substantially change the analysis done by
Harris and Associates, requiring resubmission of the Harris
report, which the city has taken as infallible.
3. The City has stated numerous times that the County of Los Angeles
has approved the additional flow of water from this subdivision
into the existing storm drainage system. I personally spent the
majority of Monday and Tuesday, 13,14 February 1989 speaking with
various personnel of the LA County Public Works division, which
is under the direction of Thomas A. Tidemanson. I was informed
independently by four staff members, Scott Ericson, Ed Gerlits,
and Angela Gallegof (I did not get the name of the fourth
gentleman), that Ed Saike of Westco Engineering submitted the
plans to the county in September 1988, but no plan check was
done, NO CALCULATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY, and the COUNTY
HAS NOT APPROVED ANYTHING REGARDING THIS SUBDIVISION BECAUSE THE
REQUIRED FEES WERE NOT PAID. The only thing the county did was
assign a Miscellaneous Transfer Drain (MTD) number (1294).`
Mr. Antich provide me Greg Kelly's name and phone number,
apparently his organization is the liaison between the city and
the county. He did not return my call, and no one in his area
was familiar with the new development. I was also told that Mr.
F
Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting 14 February 1989, Agenda Item 8.,
Review of a Grading Plan for Power Street Subdivision, Tract No.
30986. Page 2 of 3
Kelly's organization did not do
were done by the people mentioned
THERE APPEARS TO BE NO WRITTEN
APPROVED THE ADDITIONAL FLOW OF
DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
engineering calculations, they
in the previous paragraph.
EVIDENCE THAT THE COUNTY HAS
WATER INTO THE EXISTING STORM
Quoting the' 07 February 1989 letter of Mr. Michael Schbauch to
the Hermosa Beach City Council regarding Special Study 88-25 --
Review of Grading Plan for Power Street Subdivision, Tract No.
30986, "... The LA County engineers indicate that even though the
pipe is not adequate, the additional amount of water is not
significant. Where is the LA county engineers statement
DOCUMENTED?
To quote City of Hermosa Beach Memorandum from Tiny Antich to
Kevin Northcraft, dated 12 December 1988:
"4. The storm drainage system is a County facility, and
County engineers has approved the additional flow from
the proposed subdivision."
WHAT COUNTY ENGINEERS? WHERE IS THE DOCUMENTATION?
4. The last memorandum of 12/12/88 also states that:
"2. The Public Works Department has determined that all the
trees will be removed during the grading operation. It is
doubtful that any trees can be saved."
On 27 May 1986, Ms. Vargo, representing the developers, presented
a conceptual drawing of the proposed development to the Hermosa
Beach City Council. The conceptual grading plan showed the
majority of the specimen trees (over 24 inches in diameter) being
saved, as well as many of the trees in the 10 to 12 inch diameter
range. I also believe the grading was shown to be level with the
existing lots to the East. THIS PRESENTATION WAS A MAJOR FACTOR
IN THE TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF THE SUBDIVISION AND•GRADING PLAN.
IF THE CURRENT PLAN HAD BEEN PRESENTED, I BELIEVE THE COUNCIL
WOULD NOT HAVE GIVEN APPROVAL.
5. Resolution P.C. 89-10, A. states: The "French Drain" will
increase the percolation and decrease the potential of flooding.
The 80 foot french drain will also kill a very large eucalyptus
tree in the southwest corner of lot 26. This is one of the main
reasons the sewer was moved.
The french drain will also prevent the planting of adequate
landscaping required by the City.
Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting 14 February 1989, Agenda Item 8.,
Review of a Grading Plan for Power Street Subdivision, Tract No.
30986. Page 3 of 3
6. Resolution P.C. 89-10, D. states: The proposed grading plan does
not significantly differ from the original grading plan, sixteen
inches (16") higher will have no impact.
I believe this is being interpreted as being 16 inches higher
than existing grade, it is actually 3.6 FEET HIGHER THAN EXISTING
GRADE. The 16 inch delta mentioned is actually 18 inches.
7. While talking with the various members of the LA County Public
Works personnel, I raised my concerns about the sewer. I was
informed that the developer is required to provide a detailed
sewerage study to determine the impact of the new development on
the existing sewer lines. In a meeting with the Planning and
Building Directors today, I was told that this study has not
submitted.
AFTER THE REPEATED TESTIMONY OF SEWERAGE PROBLEMS, AND THE CITY'S
LETTER TO ME CONCERNING THE CONDITION OF THE LINE INTO WHICH THE
NEW DEVELOPMENT WILL TIE, I THINK THE STUDY SHOULD BE DONE PRIOR
TO APPROVAL OF THE GRADING PLAN.
Again, I Thank You For Your Time And Patience,
(A/ 1.
Warner P. Lombardi,
1849 Valley Park Avenue
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
•
14 February 1989
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Anthony Antich, Director of Public Works
FROM: William Grove, Director of Building & Safety
RE: Tract No.30986, Commonly known as Power Street
DATE: February 28, 1989
ALJ
01.
I have read the letter dated February 27, 1989 addressed to you
from Jim Marquez.
I would like to correct a statement made by Mr. Marquez regarding
the role of B.S.I., Inc. in the grading plan review process.
B.S.I., Inc. is a contract plan review firm which reviews plans
for private improvements for the Department of Building and
Safety. They are not acting as the city's hydrology consultant.
Plans for on site improvements, based on the conceptual grading
plan approved by the city council (prior to discovery of the
raised street issue), were forwarded to B.S.I., Inc. on August 5,
1987. The review was limited to on site conditions and did not
include any off site public improvements.
Due to the extensive hill side grading proposed, a separate
review of the soils report was undertaken by Baseline Consultants
acting under direction of the Department of Building an Safety.
The last action recorded by the Department of Building and Safety
regarding the grading plan was to forward the soils report review
and recommendations to Westco Engineering & Surveying for
incorporation in the grading plan. This was accomplished on
October 15, 1987.
Plan review corrections generated by B.S.I., Inc. are resubmitted
directly by the designer (Westco in this case) for correction.
If all corrections were made, B.S.I., Inc. would then forward the
plans to the Department of Building & Safety via messenger,
applicant or mail, along with a transmittal letter recommending
permit issuance. After reviewing for local requirements, the
Department of Building and Safety would issue a permit.
To date, I have not received any plans or transmittal letter from
B.S.I., Inc. Apparently Westco received this information and
failed to forward it to my office.
In any case, plans approved by B.S.I., Inc. alone do not indicate
that we are prepared to issue a permit. The soils report
information referred to above does not appear on any plans
submitted to your office, nor have they addressed any temporary
drainage facilities for use during grading and construction of
the proposed homes.
As we discussed, the City Council has designated you as lead for
this project. Jim Marquez and Westco should be advised to submit
all grading, drainage and hydrology plans and calculations to
your office directly for distribution as you deem necessary.
2
TIMOTHY H. ZIEMANN
LAWYER
1334 PARK VIEW AVENUE
SUITE 100
MANHATTAN BEACH. CALIFORNIA 90266
DIRECT MAIL TO
POST OFFICE BOX 3646
CIVIC CENTER STATION
MANHATTAN BEACH. CALIFORNIA 90266
TELEPHONIC (2131 545-2644
FACSIMILE (213) 546-5630
March 8, 1989
BY MESSENGER
Mr. Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach
Hermosa Beach City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
Re: Tract No. 30986
Power Street Subdivision
Dear Mr. Northcraft:
With Mr. Jim A. Marquez, I represent Fabiano Corporation,
et al., the developers of Tract No. 30986.
Concerning the subject of hydrology of the Tract, Mr. An-
thony Antich, Director of the Hermosa Beach Department of
Public Works, has stated that he would prefer that my
clients submit a survey map (depicting certain additional
land which Mr. Antich desired to be added to the Tract's
contributory area) prior to scheduling of the matter for
further action by the City Council.
My clients must, and do, respectfully view matters other-
wise.
With the materials currently in the City's possession,
the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works can
acknowledge how, and that, water from the Tract will
appropriately be diverted into the County Flood Control
System.
Additionally, Westco Engineering, Inc., has already cer-
tified to the City (by letter dated March 6, 1989) that
the contributory area of the Tract is in fact the area so
designated on the latest hydrology plan and calculations
already in the City's possession.
s
Mr. Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach
March 8, 1989
Page 2
There is thus no need for any such further (superfluous)
survey map to be submitted in order for the Council to
have before it all information required to pass upon the
merits of the hydrology -related aspects of the Tract.
My clients therefore request that this matter be placed
on the calendar for the Council meeting of March 14,
1989.
ly yours,
—�yl�tD
TIMOTHY H. ZIEMANN
THZ:PEM
cc: Hon. Jim Rosenberger, Mayor
Hon. June Williams, Mayor Pro
Hon. Roger Creighton
Hon. Chuck Sheldon
Hon. Etta Simpson
Mr. Anthony Antich
James P. Lough, Esq.
Hermosa Villa Homes
Tem
E. CLEMENT SHUTE. JR..
MARK I. WEINBERGER.
MARC B. MIHALY. P. C.
ALLETTA D A. BEUN
FRAN M. LAYTON
RACHEL B. HOOPER
SHUTE, MIHALY 8 WEINBERGER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
396 HAYES STREET
SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA 94102
(415) 552-7272
TELECOPIER.: (415) 552-5816
March 8, 1989
Mayor Jim Rosenberger
and Members of the City Council
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Re: Tentative Tract No. 30986
Power Street Subdivision
TERRELL J. WATT
URBAN PLANNER
WINIFRED A. BERMAN
ELLEN J. GARBER.
KENNETH L. KIMMELL
WENDY STRIMLING
ENVIRONMENTAL FELLOWS
RECEivEO
MAR O :)1989
Dear Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council:
This letter is submitted on behalf of the Hermosa
Valley Preservation Society, a group of city residents
concerned with development in the vicinity of the above -
referenced project. The Society requests that the City of
Hermosa Beach conduct the legally necessary environmental
review of tentative tract no. 30986 in light of the major
changes in the project since the 1986 approval of the
tentative tract map, including, most importantly, the change
in the contemplated grading requirements. To comply with
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Pub. Res.
Code secs. 21000 to 21177, the City of Hermosa Beach must
prepare a supplemental environmental impact report (EIR) to
analyze the environmental impact of the changes, propose
mitigation measures, and examine feasible alternatives to
the subdivision as currently designed.
The substantial changes in the subdivision require
the city to prepare a subsequent EIR. The Negative
Declaration adopted in 1986 for the proposed subdivision
fails to identify or mitigate the significant environmental
impacts of the subdivision in its current, changed design.
In situations in which an agency has already certified an
EIR or adopted a Negative Declaration, CEQA requires a
subsequent or supplemental EIR where changes in the project
or changes in the circumstances surrounding the project
involve environmental impacts not analyzed in the prior
environmental document. Pub. Res. Code sec. 21166. The
CEQA administrative guidelines have interpreted this
statutory provision to require a subsequent EIR where:
Mayor Jim Rosenberger and City Council
March 8, 1989
Page 2
(1) Subsequent changes are proposed in
the project which will require important
revisions of the previous EIR or
Negative Declaration due to the
involvement of new significant
environmental impacts not considered in
a previous EIR or Negative Declaration
on the project; [or]
(2) Substantial changes occur with
respect to the circumstances under which
the project is undertaken . which
will require important revisions in the
previous EIR or Negative Declaration due
to the involvement of new significant
environmental impacts not covered in a
previous EIR or Negative Declaration;
Cal. Code Regs. tit. 14, sec. 15162(a).
The alteration of the grading plans involves
environmental impacts not considered in the previous
Negative Declaration and thus necessitates a subsequent EIR.
The grading plan currently under debate has significant
environmental impacts which were not contemplated when the
city council approved the tentative map in May 1986 or the
conceptual grading plan in March 1987. The potential
environmental impacts which result from the revisions to the
project include the following:
1. possible flooding of adjacent
properties;
2. inadequacy of the storm
drainage system designed only
for a ten-year storm;
3. potential inadequacy of storm
drain on 20th street;
4. use of french drain system, necessitating
destruction of large eucalyptus tree and
preventing adequate landscaping; and
5. visual impacts of block wall
on adjacent properties.
Mayor Jim Rosenberger and City Council
March 8, 1989
Page 3
These potentially substantial impacts resulting from the
change in the grading plans trigger the need for a
subsequent EIR. Indeed, the fact that the change in the
grading plans has generated debate over the magnitude of the
impacts underscores the need to prepare an EIR. If the city
prepares an EIR and follows the proper CEQA procedures for
public review and comments, the city and the public will
have the information needed to evaluate the severity of the
impacts, to impose mitigation measures, and to choose
alternatives.
In analyzing the environmental impacts of the
grading, the subsequent EIR should consider the potential of
flooding if drainage facilities are not properly maintained.
Geotechnical engineers have concluded that the french drain
must be maintained, or it will cease functioning. See
Letter from AAKO Geotechnical Engineering Consultants, Inc.,
to Fabiano Corp. (Feb. 14, 1989) (attached). To reduce the
potential of flooding, the city should establish an
appropriate mechanism, such as a mandatory homeowners'
association, by which the future purchasers of the lots in
the subdivision are required to maintain the french drain
and other drainage facilities.
Another change in the project, one that has
received less attention but also requires environmental
evaluation, is the removal of existing trees. Whereas the
project as conceived at the time of the approval of the
tentative tract map contemplated saving as many trees as
possible (see Planning Commission Minutes (April 15, 1986)),
the city's Public Works Department has now "determined that
all trees will be removed during the grading operation."
Memorandum from A. Antich, Director of Public Works, to K.
Northcraft, City Manager (Dec. 12, 1988). The subsequent
EIR should analyze the environmental impact of the removal
of trees.
An on-going environmental impact that the
subsequent EIR should also address is the effect of the
subdivision on the sewage system. The sewer line to which
the subdivider proposes to link the subdivision has in the
past proved "troublesome." See Letter from Department of
Building and Safety, City of Hermosa Beach, to Warner
Lombardi (Nov. 12, 1980) (attached). The subsequent EIR
should analyze the current capacity of the sewer line and
Mayor Jim Rosenberger and City Council
March 8, 1989
Page 4
propose mitigation measures or alternatives reducing the
impact of the proposed subdivision on the sewage disposal
system.
Any information the city has already gathered on
these impacts does not relieve it of its obligation to
prepare a subsequent EIR on the tentative map. In Mira
Monte Homeowners Ass'n v. County of San Buenaventura, the
court made clear that a lead agency can not escape the
requirement of preparing a subsequent EIR merely by adding
conditions to a tentative map approval to mitigate newly
disclosed environmental effects. 165 Cal. App. 3d 357
(1985). The lead agency's imposition of additional
conditions "did not cure the [lead agency's] failure to
proceed as required by law. This is true even if the Board
would have reached the identical findings and determination
had it been in compliance." Id. at 365. Because "[t]he
value of an EIR is as an informational document," the court
required a subsequent or supplemental EIR so that
"environmental data are brought to the attention of the
agency and the public" and so that the public would be
assured of "meaningful participation." Id. For the City of
Hermosa Beach to fulfill CEQA's policy of full analysis and
disclosure of environmental effects and consequent informed
decision-making, the city must prepare a subsequent EIR to
analyze the impacts of the change in the project.
Although the city has already committed to
conducting environmental review of each lot prior to issuing
a building permit (see Resolution 86-2941, City Council
Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 30986 (May 27, 1986)),
this piecemeal review does not suffice to analyze the
impacts of the project as a whole in its current, altered
form. CEQA prohibits "chopping a large project into many
little ones --each with a minimal potential impact on the
environment-- which cumulatively may have disastrous
consequences." Bozung v. Local Agency Formation Commission,
13 Cal. 3d 263, 283 (1975). To have full information of the
environmental effects of the subdivision as currently
designed, the city must prepare a subsequent EIR.
The Hermosa Valley Preservation Society would be happy
to consult with you on the scope of the subsequent EIR.
Please notify this firm of all hearings, meetings, and any
other actions concerning the proposed subdivision. Please
also provide proper notification to residents on all sides
Mayor Jim Rosenberger and City Council
March 8, 1989
Page 5
of the proposed development. Thank you for your serious
attention to the Society's concerns.
Yours very truly,
SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER
'. ( ,../ .
/
MARK I. WEINBERGER /
Attorneys for Hermosa Valley
Preseravtion Society
cc: Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk
Attachments
ws-jt
- 1-‘1\10 ENGINEERING
COh. JLTAN1 z - r
2483 E.. ORANGETHORPE AVE / FULLERT 73.1232 Toll Free: (8001 422-4117
Job No. 5828 -P5 -A9
Febuary 14, 1989
Fabiano Corporation
c/o Jim Marquez
1334 Park View Avenue, Suite 100
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Subject: French Drain Recommendations for Surface Runoff from Easterly Adjacent
Property, Power Street and 20th Street, Hermosa Beach, California
References:
AAKO Geotechnical Engineering Consultants Inc., 7 November.1986,
Limited Soil Engineering Investigation for the Proposed Residential
Structures at the Southwest Corner of Power Street and 20th Street,
Hermosa Beach, California." Job No. 5828 -P1 -A6
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to your request, an evaluation was conducted for the use of a
french drain system to receive runoff from the easterly adjacent property.
Discussions with the engineer indicate that a 5 foot wide by 75 foot long
by 10 foot deep french drain filled to the ground surface with 3/4 inch maximum
gravel is planned along the easterly property line to intercept and receive
runoff from the adjacent property.
Reportedly the adjacent property comprises 38480 square feet tributary
drainage area. For a design 50 year storm, the maximum flow onto the subject
property would be Q=1.716 cfs with a maximum time of concentration of 10
minutes. Therefore the french drain must be able to receive and perculate 1030
cubic feet of water in a 24 hour period.
Based on Reference No. 1 a very permeable pebbly fine to coarse sand
underlies the site at a depth of 7 to 8 feet. The surface soil is silty fine to
medium sand and is classified as a Soil Type 003 from the "Los Angeles County
Hydrology Manual."
The underlying coarse soil strata is considered to have a significantly
great permeability. Therefore the french drain should extend a minimum depth of
3 feet into the coarse sand layer, which will require a total depth of 10 to 11
feet.
Previous studies and percolation testing by the undersigned indicate that
the pebbly fine to coarse sand strata will have a minimum percolation rate of 10
to 20 gallons per square foot per day. Assuming that the sidewall and bottom
absorption area of the french drain will be 11 square feet per linear foot of
trench. The total absorption area for a 75 foot long trench will be 825 square
feet.
GEOTECHNICAL
AAI<O ENGINEERING
,,vrourac ion
Doo No. bUt3-P5 Page -2-
Based on the above percolation rate, the french drain will be able to
percolate 8250 to 16500 gallons or 1100 to 2200 cubic feet of water. With the
anticipated design runoff of 1030 cubic feet of water, a 5 foot wide by 75 foot
long by 10 to 11 foot deep french drain will allow adequate percolation of the
runoff quantity with a safety factor ranging from 1.1 to 2.1.
With 3/4 inch gravel having a porosity of 30% to 40% the voids within the
french drain gravel will have a holding capacity of at least 1100 square feet,
which is greater than the design quantity of water runoff for one day.
Therefore the french drain system, sized as denoted above, should properly
function as a percolation trench for runoff water from the easterly adjacent
property.
•
The maintenance of the french drain surface is critical to its proper
functioning. The ground surface must always expose the 3/4 inch gravel, and any
silt or soil that may be washed over the gravel surface must periodically be
removed. Any siltation or debris buildup over the gravel may cause the french
drain to cease functioning.
No in-situ percolation testing was conducted on the subject site. All
conclusions and recommendations are based on anticipated soil conditions and
previous experience regarding permeability of the anticipated soil.
Details of the french drain system shall be reviewed by the undersigned.
Additionally, the french drain system shall be observed prior to gravel
installation to verify the actual conditions and to conduct percolation testing
if determined to be necessary.
This opportunity to be of services appreciated. If there are any questions
please contact this office at your convenience.
AAKO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.
!yd.. LJ/
JOHN R. GERY, GE 336
Pesi¢'ent
JRG/jlb
A A KO GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEERING
•�� q T\.!•S.INC
CIT OF bEICMOSil
•CIVIC CENTER NE
RMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA
4 0254
CITY HALL: (213) 376'6984
POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS: 376.79,31
November 12, 1980 RECEIurn
Mr. Warner P. Lombardi
P. 0. Box 668
Hermosa Beac' CA 90254•
• )10V 13 1980
EngtneetII scJt.
Subject: Sewer through Lot 28 of Tract 15546
C / 5;93 auk
Dear Warner,
Buildings cannot be constructed upon or above this easement.
You may construct paving or planting in this 5 foot strip;
but. if you do, you also accept the cost of replacement when
such improvements get destroyed as a consequence of sewer
maintenance.
A survey will be a requirement of a building permit and you
should direct the surveyor.to indicate the exact location
of the easement on his plan.
The sewer easement contains a 15 inch sewer. 'Our Director of
Public Works, Charles Clark, recommends that you not tie into
this sewer because it is a very troublesome line. He suggests
that you instead tie into the 8 inch sewer in Valley Park Ave-
nue, and that you will need to physically measure the inverts
at the two manholes on either side of your property; and he
has also offered to cooperate with your surveyor to help lift
the manholes. Coordination of this effort would be your respon-
sibility.
Sincerely,
Lee Alton, Director
Department of Building and Safety
LA/ld
cc: Charles Clark v
d L) l)ID LL -t Qlp (LVL_
puE.ko 5 E, D � Is 0 b2
•
�) •.r•
JIM A. MAAQUEZ
March 14, 1989
Hon. Jim Rosenberger, Mayor
City of Hermosa Beach
Hermosa Beach City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Re: Tract No. 30986
Power Street Subdivision
Dear Mayor Rosenberger:
In the long progression of this development through the City's
agencies, my client has always endevoured to accomodate Staff
whenever possible. Consequently, I have been instructed to
request a continuance of the matter of the Power Street Grading
Plan from the meeting scheduled March 14, 1989, to the next
regularly scheduled meeting of the Council to permit the
preparation of the Revised Topographical Survey requested by
Staff in its report of March 2, 1989. However, we believe it to
be imperative that certain matters contained in this report be
addressed prior to continuance.
Firstly, we do not support the recommendation by Staff to refer
this matter back to the Planning Commission. It is our belief that
Staff's report to the Council of the results of the survey as well
as the hydrology plans/calculations will be more than sufficient for
a meaningful decision by the Council.
Secondly, Staff's assertion that the lot lines on an unidentified
version of the grading plan do not conform to the lot lines on the
Approved Tentative Tract Map requires clarification. This is the
first time, after considerable review, that this issue has been
raised. The possibility of unwarranted delay is certainly present
should this issue prove to be a red herring.
Thirdly, I do not believe Staff's Chronolgy or history of the project
I AO
()(
5,16.71,15
JIM a
ARQJEZ
Page 2 Continued
fairly reflects the positive results of the many referrals by the
Council to Staff and the Planning Commission and I would like
the opportunity to correct this record.
Respectfully submitted,
Jim A. Marquez
JAM:THZ
cc: Hon. June Williams, Mayor Pro Tem
Hon. Roger Creighton
Hon. Chuck Sheldon
Hon. Etta Simpson
Mr. Kevin Northcraft
Ms. Kathleen Midstokke
Mr. James P. Lough, Esq.
Mr. Anthony Antich
Hermosa Villa Homes
`A;
,r.I I� ;i; .,1_) TAf vI ( I. (A (4-1:26() (` ,I:,) 5/16.7445
March 6, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of the .Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach City Council March 14, 1989
SUBJECT: POLICY STATEMENT PS 88-3 -- PLANNING COMMISSION
INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 1302 OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE REGARDING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES, AND
MORATORIUM REGARDING' ADDITIONS AND EXPANSIONS OF
EXISTING NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES
LOCATION: 45 14TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 21, BLOCK
15, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT
APPLICANT: DAVID SCHUMACHER
1612 STRAND
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
REQUEST: TO ALLOW EXISTING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE TO BE
RAISED TO LOCATE PARKING BELOW
MORATORIUM REQUESTED BY STAFF
Planning Commission Recommendation
To approve the proposed project and direct staff to study
developing a policy statement.
Staff Recommendation
1. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached
Policy Statement and, thereby, deny the proposed development.
2. Adopt the attached Emergency Moratorium regarding the
expansion of non -conforming uses and structures.
Abstract
Adoption of the proposed Policy Statement will clarify Section
1302 of the Zoning Ordinance for this project. Adoption of the
proposed moratorium will prohibit the issuance of any building
permits for a nonconforming dwelling or use until the
nonconforming section of the Zoning Ordinance can be studied.
Background
The Planning Commission, at their meeting of February 21, 1989,
recommended that the proposed Policy Statement P.S. 88-3 not be
adopted and recommended approval of the proposed alteration to
the dwelling at 45 14th Street.
Analysis
POLICY STATMENT:
The Planning Commission did not recommend adoption of the
proposed Policy Statement stating that the proposed development
is in compliance with Section 1302 of the Zoning Ordinance.
However, it is staff's opinion that Section 1302 does not apply
where the result will be substantial demolition of the existing
building. The Zoning Ordinance is a permissive code, and Section
1302 does not note permission of any type of demolition to the
existing structure; it only allows for expansion. However, staff
reconizes some demolition is necessary when expanding structures,
and therefore, policy direction is needed.
The subjectparcel is an existing nonconforming two unit
residential use in a C-2 zone. The proposed development will
require approximately 40% of the floor area and exterior walls of
the existing structure to be demolished. Also, the proposed
development will require the existing structure to be raised from
it's foundation to allow for a car port below.
Due to the extent of demolition and relocation via air space of
the existing structure, staff has determined that the development
will result in the creation of a new dwelling. Therefore,
Section 1302 should not be applicable to this development.
MORATORIUM:
Staff is also recommending the adoption of a moratorium to
prohibit the issuance of any building permit for a nonconforming
structure or use. Staff is presently working on a revision to
the City's Nonconforming section of the Zoning Ordinance. A
study and recommended resolution will be heard before the
Planning Commission at their meeting of March 7, 1989. The
adoption of the moratorium will prevent an influx of new permit
application for nonconforming developments in an attempt to
submit applications before the new ordinance is adopted
Additional background and analysis is provided in the attached
Planning Commission staff report of 2/21/89.
Alternatives
1. Adopt the attached Policy Statement and deny the adoption of
the nonconforming moratorium.
This alternative will encourage many new applications for the
expansion of nonconforming structures and uses which will
attempt to beat the proposed revisions to the nonconforming
section of the H.B.M.C.
2. Deny the adoption of the attached Policy Statement and adopt
the attached nonconforming moratorium.
This alternative will allow for the proposed development at
45 14th Street since the proposed moratorium provides a
grandfather clause for project submitted prior to March 14,
1989, and because there will be no clarification of Section
1302.
3. Deny the proposed moritorium and Policy Statement.
Attachments
1. Policy Statement 89-1
2. Moratorium Ordinance 89-
3. Section 1302 of the zoning ordinance
4. Staff report dated 2-21-89
5. Building Department memo
6. P.C. minutes of 2-21-89 & 1-17-89.
CONcU
9
Michrael Schubach
Planning Director
Kevin gortt raft
City Manager
a/pcsr45
•
An• : •ere
Associate P1:nner
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A POLICY STATEMENT INTERPRETING SECTION 1302
REGARDING DEMOLITION OF NONCONFORMING USES AND NONCONFORMING
STRUCTURES.
WHEREAS, the City Council, at their meeting of March 14,
1989, considered this matter and made the following Findings:
A. Section 1302 regarding nonconforming uses and buildings does
allows for residential uses to be expanded provided the
alteration complies with the regulations of the zone in which
the use is located.
B. Section 1302 permits residential expansions but makes no
statement regarding demolition or reconstruction of the
existing structure.
C. Section 1302 does not address relocations, including the
raising of nonconforming structures and/or uses.
D. Extensive demolition, relocation, and reconstruction of
nonconforming uses and structures can be a detriment to the
quality of life by extenting the life of said.structures for
many generations to come.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby adopt the
following policy interpretation regarding Section 1302.
1. Section. 1302 shall allow for residential expansions and/or
relocations, including raising the structure, only when such
change does not result in major demolition or reconstruction
of over 20% of either the existing floor area, or exterior
walls, or a combination thereof.
1
2
3
4
5
11
12
13
14
15
16
1
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of March, 1989.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California.
ATTEST:
PROVED S TO I FORM:
olicy
CITY CLERK
ITY ATTORNEY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO.
AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR
NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES AND/OR USES.
WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance allows for substantial
additions to existing nonconforming uses and structures;
WHEREAS, substantial alterations to nonconforming uses and
structures will maintain the nonconformity for many years to come
which compounds any current parking, density, safety, and other
environmental problems;
WHEREAS, many
nonconforming
structures
are
undergoing
substantial alterations while circumventing existing planning
regulations;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it desires a study of
nonconforming structures and uses and a recommendation from the
Planning Commission to remedy this situation;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that further reconstruction
of nonconforming uses and structures, during the period of the
study, would defeat the purpose of the study;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. No building permits shall be issued for projects
which are nonconforming to the zoning ordinance.
(a) Exceptions. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects
that have a completed building permit package on file with the
City prior to March 14, 1989. Said package must include a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
completed building permit application form, completed conceptual
plan (plot plan, floor plan, elevation plans, and similar plans,
and a lot survey). Projects that have submitted a completed
building permit package must pursue their application in a
diligent manner and must be issued a building permit within six
months of the effective date of this ordinance.
(b) This ordinance shall not apply to additions to nonconforming
structures where the proposed addition meets all of the following
criteria:
1. The value of the expansion is equal, or less than 50% of
the cost of the existing structure(s) based upon ICBG
estimate of cost per square foot of structure as calculated
by the Building Department; and
2. 107. or less of the existing dwelling will be demolished
or removed as calculated by the Building Department.
3. A minimum of two parking spaces per unit are provided.
Section 2. No building permits shall be issued for any
additions or structural alterations of nonconforming uses.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon
adoption by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council of
Hermosa Beach.
Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective for a period of
forty-five (45) days from today's date unless extended pursuant
to the provisions of California Government Code Section 65858.
Section 5. The City Council shall draft a report for
presentation to the public at their second meeting in April,
1989. Such report shall state what steps are being taken to
correct the problems referenced in this ordinance and what steps
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
are planned to be taken in the future to remedy the situation.
Section 6. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days
after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this
ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper
of general circulation published and circulated in the City of
Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law.
Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of
original ordinances of said city, shall make minutes of t'he
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings if
the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of March, 1989.
PRESIDENT of the CITY COUNCIL and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California
ATTEST:
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Sec. 1302. Nonconforming use of a nonconforming building.
The nonconforming use of a -nonconforming building may be
continued, provided such nonconforming use shall not be expanded
or extended nor shall any structural alterations be made -except
those required by law. If such nonconforming use is vacated or
discontinued for ninety (90) consecutive days or more, any future
use of such building shall conform to the provisions of the zone in
which it is located: - • . - • "' •` • •
Exception 1. Residential uses maybe expanded or structurally
altered provided the expansion or alteration complies with the
regulations of the zone' in which -the use is located. Where the'
residential use located in a "C" or "M" zone, any expansion
shall comply with R-3 regulations. (Ord. No. 84-776, § 2, 9-11-84)
February 14, 1989
Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach Planning Commission February 21, 1989
(CONTINUED FROM 1/17/89 and 2/7/89)
SUBJECT: POLICY STATEMENT PS 88-3 -- PLANNING COMMISSION
INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 1302 OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE REGARDING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES
LOCATION: 45 14TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 21, BLOCK
15, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT
APPLICANT: DAVID SCHUMACHER
1612 STRAND
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
REQUEST: TO ALLOW EXISTING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE TO BE
RAISED TO LOCATE PARKING BELOW
Recommendation
'Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the proposed
development and adopt the attached Policy Statement.
Background
Project Details --
Zoning: C-2
General Plan Designation: Commercial Recreation
Present Use: Residential; plans indicate 2 units (unable to
verify by building permits since construction predates
building records)
Analysis
The applicant is proposing to raise a portion of the existing
structure and provide 6 parking spaces below. The structure is a
nonconforming residential duplex in a C-2 zone. The existing
structure has one parking space.
Section 1302 of the Zoning Ordinance states "The nonconforming
use of a structure may be continued, provided such nonconforming
use shall not be expanded or extended nor shall any structural
alterations be made except those required by law..." This
section also provides an exception which states "Residential uses
may be expanded o'r structurally altered provided the expansion or
alteration complies with the regulation of the zone in which the
use is located."
It is the opinion of the Planning Department that this provision
does not allow for this type of proposed development where the
-(0-
c (-
structure is physically removed and relocated, including
relocations via air space, especially where extensive demolition
of walls occurs.
Staff has reviewed the plats and has determined that
approximately 40% of the existing floor area will be demolished.
The Building Department has also reviewed the plans and in their
opinion, the proposed raised structure would require "major
reconstruction," including foundation work and complete
reconstruction of one wall which presently attaches the two
units. Also, approximately 40% of the exterior walls of the
remaining lower level unit will also be demolished.
Essentially, the proposed development will be the demolition of
an existing dwelling and construction of new residential units
within a Commercial zone. Approval of this request would
maintain the nonconformity for many years to come.
The attached Policy Statement will clarify Section 1302 of the
Zoning Ordinance regarding structural alteration. The Policy
Statement will prohibit the relocation of any nonconforming use
or structure, air space relocation included, if the Planning
Commission determines that extensive demolition of floor area and
exterior walls will occur.
CONCUR.
Micba1 Schuh ach
Planning Director
a/pcsr45
Andrew Pe �a
Associate Tanner
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Micheal Schubach,
Director, Planning Dept.
FROM: Norbert Kowatschitsch, Building Inspector
RE: 45 14th Street
DATE: November 22, 1988
After field inspection of the site located at 45 14th Street, it
is my opinion that the existing rear unit which they propose to
elevate and move forward will not sustain such a move without
major reconstruction.
It is our concern that the project will essentially be the
demolition of an existing dwelling and construction of a new
dwelling in a commercial zone.
It is our suggestion that the Planning Commission determine if
this type of project is permissable pursuant to the zoning
regulations.
BACKGROUND
Al/ITER/41
4
INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 1302 REGARDING A NON -CONFORMING
RESIDENTIAL USE IN THE C-2 ZONE AT 45 14TH STREET (CONTINUED FROM
MEETINGS OF 1/17/89 AND 2/7/89) .
Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated February 14, 1989. Staff recommended that the
Planning Commission deny the proposed development and adopt the proposed policy
statement.
—/5— P.C. Minutes .2/21/89
The project is located in the C-2 zone, with a general plan designation of commercial
recreation. The present use is that of residential. The plans indicate two units; however,
staff was unable to verify by building permits, since construction predates the building
records.
The applicant is proposing to raise a portion of the existing structure and provide six
parking spaces below. The structure is a nonconforming residential duplex in a C-2
zone. The existing structure has one parking space.
Section 1302 of the zoning ordinance states: "The nonconforming use of a structure may
be continued, provided such nonconforming use shall not be expanded or extended, nor
shall any structural alterations be made except 'those required by law...." This section
also provides an exception which states: "Residential uses may be expanded or
structurally altered provided the expansion or alteration complies with the regulation of
the zone in which the use is located."
It is the opinion of the Planning Department that this provision does not allow for this
type of proposed development where the structure is physically removed and relocated,
including relocations via air space, especially where extensive demolition of walls occurs.
Staff has reviewed the plans and has determined that approximately 40 percent of the
the existing floor area will be demolished. The Building Department has also reviewed
the plans and in their opinion, the proposed raised structure would require "major
reconstruction," including foundation work and complete reconstruction of one wall
which presently attaches the two units. Also, approximately 40 percent of the exterior
walls of the remaining lower level unit will be demolished.
Essentially, the proposed development will be the demolition of an. existing dwelling and
construction of new residential units within a commercial zone. Approval of this request
would maintain the nonconformity for many years to come.
The proposed policy statement will clarify Section 1302 of the zoning ordinance
regarding structural alteration. The policy statement will prohibit the relocation of any
nonconforming use or structure, air space relocation included, if the Planning
Commission determines that extensive demolition of floor area and exterior walls will
occur. The policy statement states that no more than 20 percent of existing exterior
walls or existing floor area may be demolished or reconstructed.
Hearing opened at 12:00 A.M. by Chmn. Peirce.
David Schumacher, 1612 The Strand, Hermosa Beach, applicant, addressed the
Commission and introduced his architect Rick Coleman.
Rick Coleman, 39 14th Street, Hermosa Beach, architect, addressed the Commission and
stated that he was first approached by Mr. Schumacher approximately two years ago on
this project. At that time, the applicant desired to develop this property commercially
and plans were drawn for a six -unit motel. The applicant paid fees to structural and
mechanical engineers as well as to the architect and others. The applicant even began
the bidding process before coming to the realization that it was not economically
feasible to develop this property commercially.
Mr. Coleman stated that an informal survey of other 30- by 90 -foot C-2 lots in the City
showed that there are no similar lots which can be developed commercially because of
the City requirements. Therefore, he felt that this proposal is a sensible use of the
property.
P.C. Minutes 2/21/89
Mr. Coleman stated that the proposal is to reduce 700 square feet of a nonconforming
residential use and to create five additional parking spaces. He displayed a color
rendering of the proposal. He also showed a photograph of the existing structure. He
stated that there is no incentive for Mr. Schumacher to develop this property, if the
request is denied, other than to maintain the structure exactly as it is with a minimum of
maintenance.
Mr. Coleman added that, as an architect, he was not as enthusiastic about this project as
he was about the commercial development. He stressed, however, that he feels this
project would be an improvement over what is currently there. He said he would not be
willing to risk his reputation if he did not feel this was a good project.
Mr. Coleman passed out photographs of a similar residential project on 9th Court.
Mr. Schumacher stated that the project on 9th Court was in process during. an
earthquake, and the building withstood the movement. •
Hearing closed at 12:06 A.M. by Chmn. Peirce.
Comm. Rue asked whether this project complies with R-3 standards. He read from
Section 1302, which states that any expansion of a residential use located in the C or M
zone must comply with the R-3 regulations.
Mr. Schubach stated that the project complies as best as possible.
Comm. Rue noted concern over the way in which the code is written in regard to
nonconforming use of a nonconforming 'building, stating that the code mentions no
specific percentages. He said that the code requirements should befollowed; and that if
the Commission feels the code is in error, then the code should be amended.
Comm. Rue felt that the applicant has done quite a job on this project, and the applicant
must do as best as possible with the guidelines available. He noted, however, that he
feels the code is inadequate in this regard. He felt that to subject someone to unwritten
conditions is ludicrous.
Chmn. Peirce disagreed, stating that he felt the opposite way. He said that this project
would involve extensive structural alterations; therefore, it falls directly under Section
1302.
Comm. Edwards stated that this project would increase the parking in the area and would
probably improve the appearance of the structure. He noted that the applicant said at
the last meeting, if the building did not survive the move, he would remove the fallen
structure. Based on these facts, and on the fact that the code mentions no specific
percentages, he would support the project.
Comm. Rue noted that this proposal is unusual; however, he noted that the code mentions
no specific numbers in regard to the percentage of what can be structurally altered.
Comm. Ketz felt that by elevating this structure and putting parking under it, the
structure will be rehabilitated and it would extend the life of a nonconforming use, which
is something she did not favor encouraging.
Comm. Rue stated that the code mentions only "major structural changes," but it does
not specify what those changes can be. He did not feel this project involves major
structural changes.
--t5-
P.C. Minutes 2/21/89
Comm. Edwards felt that the zoning in this particular area has not been firmly settled at
this time, due to its proximity to the Biltmore site. Chmn. Peirce noted, however, that
this project is not within the Biltmore site zoning area.
Comm. Edwards stated that the project would provide additional parking and improve the
appearance of the building.
Comm. Rue noted that Exception No. 1 to Section 1302 states that residential uses may
be expanded or structurally altered provided the expansion or alteration complies with
the regulations of the zone in which it is located. It says nothing about the percentage of
the alteration.
Mr. Schumacher stated that nothing is being built, there will be only demolition.
MOTION by Chmn. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Ketz, to approve staff's recommendation,
Policy Statement 89-1 (which would therefore deny this project).
AYES: Comm. Ketz, Chmn. Peirce
NOES: Comms. Edwards, Ingell, Rue
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
(MOTION FAILS.)
MOTION by Comm. Edwards, seconded by Comm. Rue, to find that this project is in
conformance with Section 1302 of the zoning code as it is written.
Mr. Lough, in response to a question from Comm. Edwards,. explained that conditions
cannot be imposed on the motion.
Comm. Ingell felt that this project is in conformance with the R-3 standards; therefore,
he would vote for the motion. In regard to the Policy Statement 89-1, however, he did
not feel 20 percent demolition or reconstruction is a realistic figure in order to do any
type of remodel.
AYES: Comms. Edwards, Ingell, Rue
NOES: Comm. Ketz, Chmn. Peirce
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Chmn. Peirce directed staff to return at a future date with additional information
regarding a policy statement for Section 1302 of the zoning code.
f6_
P.C. Minutes 2/21/89
INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 1302 REGARDING A NONCONFORMING
RESIDENTIAL USE IN THE C-2 ZONE AT 45 14TH STREET
Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated January 10, 1989. The project is located in the C-2
zone, with a general plan designation of commercial recreation. The present use is as
residential; plans indicate two units, but staff is unable to verify by building permits
since construction predates building records.
The applicant is proposing to raise a portion of the existing structure and provide six
parking spaces below. The structure is a nonconforming residential duplex in the C-2
zone. The existing structure has one parking space.
Section 1302 of the zoning ordinance states: "The nonconforming use of a structure may
be continued, provided such nonconforming use shall not be expanded or extended nor any
structural alternations be made except those required by law...." This section also
provides an exception which states: "Residential uses may be expanded or structurally
P.C. Minutes 1/17/89
•
•
C
altered provided the expansion or alteration complies with the regulations in which the
use is located."
It is the opinion of the Planning Department that this provision does not allow for this
type of proposed development where the structure is physically removed and relocated,
including relocations via air space.
The Building Department has also reviewed the plans and in their opinion, the proposed
raised structure would require "major reconstruction," including foundation work and
complete reconstruction of one wall which presently attaches the two units. Also,
approximately 40 percent of the exterior walls of the remaining lower level unit will also
be demolished.
Essentially, the proposed development will be the demolition of an existing dwelling and
construction of new residential units within a commercial zone.
The policy statement proposed by staff will clarify Section 1302 of the Zoning Ordinance
regarding structural alteration. The Policy Statement will prohibit the relocation of any
nonconforming use, air space relocation included.
Staff recommended that the Planning Commission deny the proposed development and
approve the proposed policy statement.
Chmn. Peirce asked how much of the original building will remain.. .
Mr. Schubach noted that that is the issue which needs to be determined.
Hearing opened at 12:13 A.M. by Chmn. Peirce.'
David Schumacher, 1612 The Strand, applicant, addressed the Commission. He stated
that he acquired this building in 1962. He stated that the property is at 45 14th Street,
which is one lot east of the Biltmore Site, and is a single-family residence of
approximately 850 square feet. He stated that it is a shed -type structure on the back.
The shed is between the building and the small apartment in the rear, which is
approximately 500 square feet and has a garage.
Mr. Schumacher plans to demolish the shed -type portion of the building and move the
existing apartment building forward, lift it up, and build a platform for six automobile
parking spaces.
Mr. Schumacher stated that he would like to have the parking spaces since he owns ten
units on The Strand, and he now has only one parking space. He felt this proposal would
ease the parking problem in the area. He also owns other units on The Strand which do
not have enough parking. He currently rents garages for his tenants to use.
Mr. Schumacher stated that the parking problem will only become worse when something
is built at the Biltmore site. He felt that his proposal would be of benefit to the area.
Rick Coleman, 39 14th Street, project architect, addressed the Commission and stated
that this proposal would be very favorable to the City. They are proposing to demolish
700 square feet of a nonconforming residential use in order to provide five additional
parking spaces. The existing structure will be refurbished and upgraded. He disagreed
with the staff report, stating that the building will be able to withstand the move. He
stated that Bell House Movers is also confident that it will withstand the move, and they
fg=
P.C. Minutes 1/17/89
c
have examined the building and find no problem with elevating this building.
Mr. Coleman said that Bell has even put forth a contract, attesting to their confidence
that this project can be done. He stated that new foundation work will be necessary;
however, the structure will definitely survive the move. He stated that there is a
conventional foundation currently underneath the building. He stated that the proposal
will greatly enhance the appearance of the site.
Chmn. Peirce asked what would happen if the house cannot stand the move and it cracks
in half. •
Mr. Schumacher stated he is so certain that will not happen that he is willing to pay to
have the• work performed. • He continued by stating that he works as a real estate
appraiser and is well versed in this type of work, since he worked on the project of
relocating houses which were near the airport. He noted that that work was also done by
Bell House Movers, who have been in business almost one hundred years. He stated that
with his experience, he believes the building will not fall apart.
Comm. Rue noted that the Commission must follow the guidelines set forth in the
ordinance. He asked how the applicant felt this ordinance is not applicable in this
instance. He read aloud Section 1302 of the ordinance. '
•
Mr. Coleman stated that structurally, the structure stays exactly as •it is. Also, the
intent of the code section is sufficiently vague in this case to ask staff to recommend •
that the Commission deny the request. He felt that the ordinance is not clear in this
instance. He also stated that when this process was started several months ago, the
Planning Director agreed that this was ati unusual case, and. it took several days before
he informed the applicant that he could find nothing in the code which prohibited this
type of project; therefore, the applicant proceeded in good faith with the plans. But
when the plans were submitted to the Building Department, the issue of the building not
being able to withstand the move arose. Therefore, the applicant is now appearing
before the Commission.
Mr. Schtibach stated that after the building was examined, the Building Department
determined that extensive work would be necessary, contrary to the intent of the
ordinance. Therefore, the issue is before the Commission at this time for interpretation.
Chmn. Peirce noted that the real issue here is whether a person can raise a house and
provide parking underneath it.
Comm. Ingell felt that anything which increases parking in the City is something which
should be studied.
Chmn. Peirce stated that this property is in the C-2 zone and could be turned into a
parking lot. He questioned whether the Commission really wants to encourage the type
of project being proposed
Hearing closed at 12:24 A.M.
Comm. Ingell stated that many years ago his parents had their house moved by Bell
Movers, and the home is still lived in today. He noted that Bell's reputation is very fine,
and if they felt it can be moved safely, he tended to agree.
lq-
P.C. Minutes .1/17/89
c
Chmn. Peirce stated that this proposal involves a substantial modification being made to
a structure, which is in violation of Section 1302. Therefore, he could not support this
type of project.
Comm. Rue questioned whether structural alterations include demolition.
Mr. Schubach stated that the policy statement does not currently address the specific
point of demolition.
Mr. Schubach, in response to a question by Chmn. Peirce, stated that once parking is
added to the lot, it is required to be maintained there for use by the residents on that lot
according to the parking ordinance; also, once the parking is added, it cannot be
removed.
Comm. Edwards noted that the code does not actually specify the meaning of
"alteration." He stated that this project does not appear•to be substantial.
Chmn. Peirce asked, however, whether this is the type of project the City wants to •
encourage.
Comm. Rue.agreed that there are other alternatives which would be more conducive to
the area.
MOTION by Chmn. Peirce to approve staff's recommendation to deny the.•propospd •
development and to adopt the proposed policy statement, P.C. 89-1.
Comm. Rue stated that it could be added that substantial structural changes are being
made.
Comm. Ingell stated that he did not want to make a decision on the policy statement at
this time, noting the lateness of the hour. He felt the issue should be studied further.
MOTION WITHDRAWN BY CHMN. PEIRCE.
MOTION by Chmn. Peirce to deny the proposed development, based on the fact that
Section 1302 prohibits a development such as this where a building is lifted, torn down 40
percent, and then reconstructed.
Comm. Ingell did not feel that is the intent of Section 1302. He again noted the lateness
of the hour for making such a decision. He continued by reading aloud from the code.
He felt that the item should be continued so that the Commission can further study this
issue.
MOTION WITHDRAWN BY CHMN. PEIRCE
MOTION by Chmn. Peirce to deny the project at 45 14th Street based on the fact that it
violates the structural alteration portion of Section 1302. MOTION DIES FOR LACK OF
A SECOND.
MOTION by Comm. Ingell, seconded by Comm. Ketz, to continue this item to the next
meeting of the Planning Commission.
— — P.C. Minutes •1/17/89
AYES: Comms. Edwards, Inge11, Ketz, Rue
NOES: Chmn. Peirce
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Comm. Ingell suggested that this item be placed at the beginning of the agenda at the
next meeting.
Comm. Edwards stated that he would be absent from the next meeting.
- - - - - - - — - - - -
— 21— P.C. Minutest/17/89
Mrs. Lorraine Roberts
1656 Bayview Drive
Hermosa Beach, California
90254
13 March 1989
Hermosa Beach City Council
1315 Valley Drive - Civic Center
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
Re: Item #6 Agenda for March 14, 1989/ Policy Statement
Dear Council Members,
Since Item #6 of the March 14, 1989 agenda is a non-public hearing matter, I
respectfully submit the enclosed copies of photographs illustrating the problems
described in my January 1989 letter to Mayor Rosenberg. I hope this information
is helpful in making your decision.
The need for a moritorium
density, the lack of open
fact that construction on
regulations.
is evident from these photos which reflect the high
space, and the closeness of the houses and given the
the single story structure is inevitable under current
It seems to me that the council could reasonably take the following action to
deal with this type of problem: (1) approve a moritorium until current ordinances
can be properly reviewed; (2) form a review team made up of council, staff, and
legal to assess the need for change in city regulations on this matter; (3) re-
write the ordinances to allow for needed repairs on property, but to control the
continued construction on non -conforming structures; (4) enact the re -written
code sections.
The moritorium is needed now in order to precluded continued construction and
approval of construction plans while the extend to the issue is explored. Thank
you.
Sincerely,
i 4- L. L= 4,-
Roberts --1
Lorraine
R.
4,
-
k.
4k.
i►
Ca?eh 6, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Hermosa Beach City Council of March 14, 1989
INFORMATIONAL REPORT REGARDING PROPOSAL TO USE
POLICE DOGS IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council:
1. Give staff direction regarding implementation of a canine
program for the Police Department.
2. Receive and file this report.
BACKGROUND:
In the mid 1960's, the City of Hermosa Beach Police had an active canine program
which was one of the first in Los Angeles County. During that period, there
were two dogs and handlers assigned to the program.
Eventually, the canine program was dropped for financial reasons as the dogs got
older and needed to be replaced.
ANALYSIS:
Several Officers have expressed an interest in starting a canine program in
Hermosa Beach once again for many reasons. One Officer, Joe Pelka, recently
submitted a proposal for the use of dogs in the department.
Officer Pelka's report was well written and contained many interesting facts
concerning the use of police dogs. Officer Pelka indicated that there might be
enough interest and community support to fund a canine program with donations.
As a result of this report, Officer Pelka was given permission to investigate
the possibility of community support for a program and he was instructed to
report the findings for further consideration of the program.
Officer Pelka has been talking with various civic and community groups about the
program and has reported that there is positive community support for such a
program and believes that the funds for the start-up will be donated by several
groups.
Before we proceed any further, staff asks that Council provide policy direction
regarding the implementation of a canine program.
CONCUR:
Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager
bmitted,
Steve S. Wisniewski
Director of Public Safety
r
CITY MANAGER COMMENT:
Having researched a canine corps in my former position, I
believe the City would have direct benefit from this program.
I would recommend we pursue community support for one canine
officer initially. Since we lack numerous large warehouses,
I would recommend narcotics training be included, as the drug
enforcement application may prove to be the most beneficial.
The City costs, such as for officer training time, could be
funded through asset seizure funds.
PROPOSAL FOR THE USE OF POLICE DOGS
IN THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
OFFICER
JOSEPH R. PELKA
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
JANUARY 1989
BACK TO THE FUTURE
-:ERMOL A LEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT - 1964
Pictured above (left to right) are Officer Fred bowman and
nis partner. Falcon , and -Duke' with his partner, k rficer
=eorze Carpenter. The HBPD canines were the : i r:7t in L,)s Angeles
.n- :nd : e l the first teams In t.ne .tate. The,' were used
~
Teams were ;reen oalled upon :„ assist ther agencies. Hermosa
=eacn was ahead cf its time in 1964. ,and set the standards for
cher epartment3 `.D achieve.
Fred Bowman presently teaches community college Police
science classes in northern California. '_ieorEe Carpenter
.s nresently a lieutenant with the Morro Pay Police .eoartment
_n •_entrai 'al iiornis.
PART I:
PART II:
APPENDIX
TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE PROBLEM
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
PROBLEM AREAS
COMMUNITY CONCERNS
POLICE DEPARTMENT CONCERNS
1.
1
1
2
3
3
THE SOLUTION 5
INTRODUCTION/PROPOSAL 5
ACHIEVEMENT OF GOALS, PROPOSALS AND PLANS 5
IMPACT ON THE COMMUNITY 5
IMPACT ON THE POLICE DEPARTMENT 6
STAFFING/SUPERVISION 6
VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT 7
VENDORS 7
''OSTS 8
FUNDING 9
CONCLUSION 10
11
HBPD GOALS, PROPOSALS & PLANS 12
ADLERHORST COSTS FOR DOGS/TRAINING/EQUIPMENT 15
NEA STORIES:HUMAN INTEREST -ANIMALS IN POLICE WORK 22
POLICE DOG NEWS STORIES: OFFICER SAFETY 42
POLICE DOG NEWS STORIES: AREA SEARCHES 46
POLICE DOG NEWS STORIES: NARCOTICS DETECTION 53
PART I: THE PROBLEM
INTRODUCTION
This paper is a proposal for the use of police dogs in the
Hermosa Beach Police Department. The first section, "The Problem"
will outline some of the problem areas in the city. The second
part, "The Solution", will demonstrate how police dogs can help
in those problem areas.
BACKGROUND
Animals have long been used by man to assist them with their
needs. The first domesticated animals were probably early horses
which were used as "beasts of burden". In time, the wolves and
foxes evolved and were themselves domesticated. Dogs were first
used by man probably for protection against other wild animals.
as well as for hunting purposes. In more modern times, dogs were
used for herding purposes, where the dog's two most important
traits were used: intelligence and protectiveness/loyality. Today
we find animals, and dogs in particular, being used more and more
to serve man's needs. Dogs are used to guide, assist and protect
blind and deaf people. The use of dogs and now monkeys are being
expanded to assist persons with othbr handicaps. such 3s paraple-
aics.
With the exception of helping the handicapped, the .animal
kingdom's greatest assistance to man has been in the police/
emeraencv services field. Police dogs. whether German shepherd,
_r another breed. have long been used by police departments in
Doth the United metates and Europe. Police dogs can be used for
different purposes, depending on the training the dog/handler
team has received. Police Service Dogs (often called 'patrol
(fogs"). are the most common. The Police Service Dog is used to
locate. pursue, and apprehend suspects. The dogs are excellent
in providing officer safety, in that they can alert officers of a
ridden .uspect lona before the officers themselves would detect
a hidden person. En addition, the dogs are trained to subdue and
contain an aggressive (armed or not) suspect. This prevents, or
minimizes injury or death for both the law officers, and the
suspect himsei- Other tasks that dogs can be trained for in-
,iude: _iarcotica detection, explosives detection, flammable
:material detection used in arson investigations). live person
detection (whether intentionally hidden such as a person conceal-
ed in a vehicle to illegally enter the country, or a person
`.rapDea in the rubble of a building destroyed in an•earthQuake),
3s well as dead body detection (often called a "cadaver dog -1,
which also would be used at the scene of a disaster.
1
AL1 of the police departments in the South Bay, with the ex-
ception of Hermosa Beach. have police dogs. Even Palos Verdes,
which has a smaller police department, less residents and very
few business/commercial buildings, has two police dogs. In the
mid 1960s, Hermosa Beach did have two handler/canine teams, as
pictured in the front of this proposal. The Hermosa dogs were
the first in Los Angeles County at that time.
Presently, HBPD patrol officers must call on neighboring
agencies when a police dog is needed in Hermosa Beach. This
causes delays in response, and wastes time and manpower. These
are items we can not afford to waste in a department our size.
My life was saved by a Redondo Beach police dog on 12 Jan.
1981. I, along with other HBPD officers had been sent to the
Redondo Beach pier to assist with the search of an armed, mur-
der/robbery suspect. Another suspect had already been killed
in an exchange of gun fire with two RBPD officers. leaving one
Dfficer shot (he recovered from his wound) and the other injured
from being struck in the face by flying glass (he also fully
recovered and did not have any eye damage). A second armed sus-
pect. later identified as Dane Joseph Briock, had hidden himself
in heavy brush between the pier and some large apartment build-
ings. RBPD Officer (now Sgt) Randy Martin arrived with his dog
and started to search the area. After about 10 minutes, the dog
located the suspect in the bushes about 20 feet behind me and 10
feet above me. The suspect did put up some resistance, but was
subdued by the dog, with no officer injuries and minimal injury
to the suspect, despite the suspect.bei.ng armed and capable of
deadly force. Later, when the suspect was interviewed by RBPD
detectives, he mentioned that he had a clear shot at me and could
have easily killed me. However. the suspect said he knew the
adds were against him and he "did not feel suicidal".
PROBLEM AREAS
Hermosa Beach has two areas in the city that presently, or
:n the near future. will utilize a high amount of police re-
sources: the downtown/pier/beach, and the growing commercial
establishments such as the Vons shopping center and the new
Pavilion mall in the Pier/PCH area.
The downtown/pier/beach area has always had a reputation
for alcohol/drug use and general rowdiness. The problem is not
unique to a beach community, but is compounded in Hermosa Beach
because of tht=high concentration of bars and stores selling
icoholic beverages in the area. In addition, the area long ago
starting in the mid to late 1960s) catered to an -anti.-
establishment" mentality. such as bikers. "hippies", and the
anti -war movement. Although these social movements have dimin-
ished, -,he carry-over from those times still prevails, and the
city .;till has the reputation as a "party town". Until recently,
the Pier 52 bar had a sign just inside its front door, stating:
2
'No Colors", in reference to the wearing of motorcycle jackets
with patches from outlaw biker gangs. The downtown business
owners have long voiced their concern and desire to clean-up
the area and make it look like downtown Manhattan Beach.
The new commercial/business centers now starting to appear
along PCH will require even more police services. The new
Pavalion mall will attract more shoppers to Hermosa Beach. and
with them more crime, as both shops and shoppers become victims.
The parking structure alone has 11 seperate parking decks, and
numerous fire exits that would allow a suspect to escape. The
search of the parking structure alone would require more officers
than are normally assigned to an average shift. In addition,
the lower parking decks are underground, which prevents our
present radio frequency from being transmitted or received.
COMMUNITY CONCERNS
The community has generally given the department high marks
for its personnel. but have been disappointed by the lack of
services the department provides. People often feel that HBPD
is not a "full service" department.
Granted. the city government has always been faced
with budget restrictions, due to its limited tax base. The
city is now attempting -to attract new businesses (such as Vons
and the Pavilion) to increase its tax base. However, most
commercial interests want a safe and secure community in which
to locate their new facility. At present. our police depart-
ment has nothing directed specifically for the protection of
commercial/shopping establishments. As such. there is very
Little the police department offers as an incentive to attract
future commercial growth.
POLICE DEPARTMENT CONCERNS
The use of police dogs is a common tool now used when
searching for a suspect. Dogs are also often used when officers
find an "open door" when responding to an alarm call. The use
-t dogs removes much of the risk to officers from death or in-
jury and greatly increases officer safety. However. not having
)ur own police dog requires the department to request assistance
from neighboring agencies. This delay, while the officers wait
for the dog tu-strive wastes time. and may back-up other calls
that are holding. In addition. many officers get impatient. or
.o riot even request .3 dog, doing the search themselves. Finally,
even if another department's dog is used, and responds quickly.
HBPD assumes all the legal problems/liability issues associated
with mutual aid. Such problems include: the officer/handler not
being familiar with city geography, department policy (such as
the use of force), and the lack of control over the K9 team's
training and procedures.
Besides suspect searches, narcotic detection dogs can assist
in searching areas for illegal drugs. If a dog from another
agency is used, and assets are seized, then that other agency
will eventually receive some of the asset forfeitures that
would have been awarded to HBPD.
- 4 -
PART II: THE SOLUTION
INTRODUCTION/PROPOSAL
In light of the problems presented in the previous pages.
I propose that the Hermosa Beach Police Department acquire two
Police Service Dogs, and train two officers as canine handlers.
The dogs themselves should have the required traits so that they
can later be cross -trained in narcotics detection. However.
neither the dogs or their handlers will need the narcotics train-
ing initially. Many canine handlers have told me that being a
new handler is like being a rookie officer: you have to learn the
.lob all-over again. Since any new program will have some growing
pains, it would be best to limit the officer/dog team's function
purely to patrol duties and not be involved in narcotics searches
until Later.
ACHIEVEMENT OF DEPARTMENT GOALS. PROPOSALS AND PLANS
By starting a K9 program, the department directly
goal number 26, as set by the Public Safety Director.
addition, the K9 program will contribute towards goals
1, 2. 4, 5, and 14, as set by the Public Safety Directo
Goals, Proposals and Plans are listed in the appendix.
IMPACT ON THE COMMUNITY
achieves
In
number:
r. The
The use of police dogs will have many positive impacts on
,:ommunity. First and foremost, the department will be more
-.ffective .and efficient. .and this will lead to a safer ,community.
-afer community will enhance the department's image and this
:an ,ead to improved community relations, an increase in quali-
`iea police applicants for future employment with the department,
:s well as making the city more attractive to future commercial
concerns. The dogs themselves will produce positive community
relations for the department. Most people have strong, positive
feelings about animals in general. The police dogs, by their very
::store, rill -ause -.,i:: human r.rait to reflect positively c.n the
tepartment. A number 'f newspaper articles regarding the use of
-pas and horses by police agencies can be found in the appendix.
All ct the articles present a positive view of the animal and the
officers and -departments involved. The press often presents
7-oiice agencies in a negative light for various reasons. Despite
-.his. t have never seen a negative press article on police dogs.
Many of the articles deal with the death or retirement of a
police dog. Based on these, the dogs often get bigger and better
--rens than their human counterparts in law enforcement.
5
IMPACT ON THE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Despite the emotions that animals bring out in humans, a
police dog is still only a tool of the job. The use of dogs will
benefit the department in many ways:
1 Officer safety:
2 Efficiency:
3 Morale:
4 Revenue:
Decreased injuries and their related costs.
Faster building and area searches. One K9
team is as efficient as three officers.
Increased officer safety, job enrichment,
department image enhancement.
Through asset seizures if the dog(s) are
narcotics detection trained.
Other areas the dogs can be used for are crowd/suspect control.
In times past. the city has had near riots on the beach. although
this has not occurred in many years. However, the city is faced
with a small, but growing, gang problem. Hermosa Beach has had
some gang related crimes/incidents to date. In addition, some of
Redondo Beach's gang problems are sure to affect us sooner or
later. Both dog handlers and gang officers have informed me that
police canines are one of the few ways to control uncooperative
gang members, other than by a massive police presence. Police
canines are one of the few things that gang members fear and
respect.
STAFFING/SUPERVISION
Initially, only one canine team should be fielded.. As in
.tl new programs, there will be problems and "Erowing pains".
If the team is successful and accepted by the department as a
:iabie tool. then another canine team should be added. rhe K9
teams will be under the direct supervision of the on -duty watch
commander. The administration of the K9 program will be under
the control of the Patrol Division Commander. Both the watch
commander and:the Division Commander will direct the canine
teams activity in what ever way they feel is appropriate to deal
with particular problems, or achieving long or short term goals.
However. the field tactics of a search or other activity centered
around the K9 team will be directed by the canine handler, under
the supervision of the on -duty watch commander.
Once two K9 teams are in place, a suggested schedule would
be a 3/12 olars is now used by patrol. One team would work
Zunday-Tuesday, and the other team would work Thursday -Saturday.
.ach team would have their 'make-up" day on a different Wednesday
so that all days of the week would be covered. except for every
third Wednesday. The hours of the shift would be at, the
direction of the Patrol Division Commander, a suggested shift
would be from 1500 hours to 0300 hours. This would provide an
on -duty K9 team 12 hours a day, nearly every day.
Another concept would be for the South Bay police
departments to cooperate and achieve a "master canine schedule".
This would involve the departments in "pooling" their K9 teams
so that at least one K9 team is always on -duty in the South Bay
and available to assist other agencies. This is similar to the
Christmas season DUI teams that have combined officers of diff-
erent South Bay departments. By doing this, the HBPD canine
teams would be of benefit to the city, as well as all of the
South Bay.
If staffing allows, other officers should be allowed to ride
with the K9 team. This would allow the other officers to become
better acquainted with the canine team and learn the team's uses,
tactics, and strengths and weaknesses. When a K9 team conducts
a search, usually another officer assists by watching the handl-
er's back as the handler watches and directs his dog. Our reserve
officers can assist in this area by being routinely assigned as a
second officer to the canine unit. In this way, the handler
already has his back-up, and a regular patrol unit does not have
to be used to fill the position.
VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT
Each canine team will need its own vehicle which has been
modified for canine use. The modifications include the instal-
lation of a platform where the rear seat normally is. as well
as other items of particular use fo-r the K9 team. In the past,
the normal four door patrol car, with modifications. has been
used. However. many agencies (Long Beach, Irvine. Newport Beach)
are now using the Jeep station wagon for their canine units.
The advantage of the Jeep is additional room for the dog, as
well as four wheel drive capability so the vehicle can be used
�n the beach.
Besides the vehicle, other items will be needed for the K9
team, such as leashes, harnesses, training equipment (for both
dog and handler), dog food, etc. A list of K9 equipment and
their costs is in the appendix.
VENDORS
The police jogs and the handler training can be provided by
many differelt=sources. Below are listed four companies that
have ipeen used. and recommended, by other police departments:
Adlerhorst International, Inc.
3951 Vernon Ave, Riverside. CA 92509
7141 685-2430
Owner: David Beaver
7
Master K-9
Beaumont, CA
(714) 845-2780
Owner: Dan Lamaster
Tony Bairos Kennels (formerly named Mandelyn Kennels)
2910 Gibson St. Bakersfield, CA 93308
(805) 323-9161
Owner: Tony Bairos
Witmer -Tyson Imports
2005 Spring St. Redwood City, CA 94062
(415) 364-6987
Owners: Randy Tyson -Witmer & Dave Witmer
COSTS
The costs of a canine team will vary, depending on where
the dog is purchased and the type of training the dog and
handler receive. In addition. if a new police car is purchased,
instead of converting an existing police car, that expense must
be included. Below is an estimate of the cost of one K9 team for
its first year of operation:
1 Police Service Dog $ 5,000
99 Handler training ... $ 1,500
3 Equipment $ 500
4 Vehicle conversion $ 3.000
5 Dog food $ 400
Routine vet. care $ 600
Total $ 11.600
The cost of a new vehicle is not included. because the department
may opt to use an exisiting unit. If not, because the vehicles
are leased, it would not be appropriate to list the total pur-
cnase price in this format.
Of the $11.000 total. $10.000 is a one-time initial capital
xpense. If the $10.000 is pro -rated over four years (the aver-
age useful life of a police dog), then the expense is only $2.500
per year. This amount is very small compared to the numerous
benefits received. These benefits would include less IOD costs
from the inorsased officer safety, and quicker area/building
:searches that would save the department time and manpower.
- 8 -
be:
The estimated costs for the second year of one K9 team would
1 Narcotics dection training $ 2.000
2 Maintenance training $ 1,000
3 Dog food $ 400
4 Routine vet. care $ 600
Total i --117d00
At this point, the canine team would be narcotics detection
trained. In addition to the economic benefits mentioned
above, the canine team would now start to produce revenue,
through asset seizures from drug investigations and search
warrants.
The estimated costs for each of the folowing years would
be:
1 Maintenance training $ 1,000
2 Dog food $ 400
3 Routine vet. care $ 600
Total $ 2,000
The above costs do not -include inflation, and assume that
the individual costs stay constant.
FUNDING
The easiest way to pay for these costs would be out of the
.-iepartment's own budget. However, with the tight budget con-
straints tnat the city has, some other funding sources could be
used. sucn as:
The approx. $ 200,000 narcotic asset seizure.
Grants or funding assistance from other government
agencies.
3 Donations from local civic/business groups. such as
the ;hamber of Commerce, Rotary Club, Kiwanis Club,
Downtown Business Association. etc.
9
CONCLUSION
The use of dogs in police work has long been accepted.
They are now considered "standard equipment", .iust as portable
radios are. In building searches, one K9 team is as effective
as three police officers. The costs of one canine team are very
minimal when compared to the costs of three officers.
The argument is sometimes made that HBPD is "too small" to
have its own canine team(s). To this I totally disagree. In a
small department such as ours, manpower and other resources are
minimal. The effectiveness and efficiency that police dogs can
provide are even more important in a small agency.
Through dedicated effort by both line personnel and
administrators, the Hermosa Beach Police Department has the need,
and the resources. to initiate and nurture a successful canine
program.
- 10 -
APPENDIX
GOALS, PROPOSALS AND PLANS
1- Hermosa Beach Police Department will regain its reputation
as one of the most respected, professional departments in
Southern California. In the future, when individuals talk
about the Hermosa Beach Police Department, they will be
talking about our innovative ways of doing things and will
look to us for ideas and leadership.
(F) We will establish and maintain strong community relations
programs which enhance the crime prevention efforts and
improve the image and acceptance of the police force within.
the entire community. This includes establishing
cooperative relationships with community groups.
3. We will establish and maintain open and credible
relationship with the news media and other public interest
groups.
4. We will establish and develop strong cooperative
relationships and programs with other law enforcement and
public safety agencies in our area.
We will develop a plan of organization for the department
which may include reallocation of shifts to respond to crime
statistics/patterns, and review of department policy and
procedures to ensure effective, high quality police services
are provided to the community;=.
6. We will hold annual goal setting sessions to develop
department goals for the Hermosa Beach Police Department.
(This must be a team effort and not just the Chief's ideas.)
7. All current policies and procedures will be evaluated. A
comprehensive operational and administrative policy and
procedures manual will be developed, published, and
implemented. We will implement programs and training to
ensure department wide understanding and compliance with
standardized policies and procedures.
8. There will be established clearly defined criteria and
personnel procedures for performance evaluations, promotions
and rotational transfers within the force. We will
establisd implement assessment center programs to ensure
promotional opportunities are basedon merit.
9. The current Records system and physical location will be
evaluated. We will develop a plan, acquire equipment and
implement computerized automation and micro -filming of the
Records function as well as addressing the issue of records
confidentiality and security.
10. Facilities will be evaluated, a remodel plan will be
developed, and corrective action will be taken to improve
our work environment with the best utilization of space
available.
11. A strong cooperative working relationship with the City
Manager, department heads and council members will be
established.
12. The leadership will be provided which develops a strong
sense of pride, espirit de corps, and high morale within the
department and ensures a strong commitment to high quality
police services to the community.
13. A needs assessment will be conducted of all department
members to determine areas of deficiencies. A training
policy and plan will be developed and a training/career
development program will be implemented to eliminate those
deficiencies and to maintain a high degree of
professionalism in the force. There will be developed and
implemented a quality in-service audio/visual training
program.
14.x; We will develop and implement a pro -active, directed Patrol
system aimed at reducing crime and increasing officer
productivity.
15. We will develop and implement a "dual career ladder"
approach and system for afficer:recognition, reward and
incentive.
16. Evaluation of all sworn positions and civilianizat:ion where
possible to reduce cost of police service and place more
sworn officers in the field.
17. implement quarterly qualifications of all sworn officers.
Plan and implement an upgrade of the existing firearms range
or develop alternative for qualifications.
18. Develop and implement a Master Patrol Officer Plan in lieu
cf the traditional Watch Commanders List which will provide
incentives and career development.
19. Develop and implement a physical fitness plan which will
provide -i entives for employees to maintain a high degree
cf physical fitness.
20. Hold regular supervisory meetings and communicate the
information to all employees of the department.
21. :pork as a team to ensure that working at the Hermosa Beach
Police Department is a rewarding experience, one that is
enjoyable.
22. Work to increase and ensure maximum utilization of the MDT's
in the patrol units in order to lower our overall
communications cost.
23. Conduct a complete review and evaluation of each position
and classification in the department; revise and publish
appropriate job descriptions as required.
24. Develop and implement an awards and commendations program
for employee and citizen recognition.
25. Establish an active program aimed at recruiting minorities
into sworn police officer positions.
Evaluate and study feasibility of Narcotics K-9; rejoining
South Bay Task Force, establish a cooperative helicopter
unit with area cities, and other programs as appropriate.
:ear Sir:
Since we _rained cur first -,lice Service Dog t =
nf orce:�.e. - 'n � - �� w y _„ seams for law
•- -- -c er .ors: as evolved into the lart
private Pc__ce S„ . Handler School i:1 t :e world. we are the
_novators of the accelerated training programs, followed by
closel monitored
kept aminimum on-going training. The officer town time is
without sacrificing quality, a very cost
ti e
effec v system. ..ur quaff' 1 e
Seri- .,- are-� :t cin requirements remer.ts fcrr mol
Service Dogs recognized Police
-qr{1-- .. as one of the most comprehensive in
the world. This type of program insures our teams are `rained
r
poperly and maintain y - .
_ ai r.. a very high degree of competence, keeping
r:ch and-rabil_ty low. :Our _ull timed - '
staff a _ e :f :he .. _ J S .. � . � ..+ P.`�.. or. - -t � ... 1 u: e
_faders e.. the_. _ alit_. Additionally, we brLn:, the
field from Europe to help instruct andevaluateeai"E. 't- -- _zrec- o= :he
- bG_ m=. _ w-= .: -r= r===onsitie=or the . - s 1. uc ..' .l -cy.. ^ -,
:e -tr=ied advanced handler course. This , s a ' -Z0 hour 1.cllr .-.rcgram,
conducted E times a _year and designed to meet the requirements of
•-J-!"Grp _ _ _ - _
: ery_rce .,oc teams.
Our .-. raj_ ^r - cl.ruc...ure over thealmost 12 years we have
✓-- Gv
i^ used
_ot er arcele_at=c as -api..'1y . _s -an -..er
items used _ law enforcement; however, the'increases due ^
tremendous problem ..c cG. oerhead scompcufdec :he
procuring Insurance, and the fact that the
buying power c± t .5. collar -:as been diminfished a_..,
_ost
_ _� ears. 'These =acts.ece
= - � -- ssitate
increase =�_ fiscal
structurerto assist year
r_ ?lease note the following _rice
_ this crucial budget planning time.
*DvER*
ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL. INC. 3951 Vernon Avenue • Riverside. Ca 92509 • 714-685-2430
LARGEST PRIVATE POLICE DOG SCHOOL IN THE WORLD • IMPORTING • TRAINING • BREEDING • TRAINING EQUIPMENT
S :JC. W000002 • DEA. PA0232568. PA0232520
/ < —
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1988
POLICE SERVICE DOGS
GERMAN SHEPHERD DOG -WITH TRAINING TITLE
$5,200
3ELGIAN MALINOIS-CERTIFIED EUROPEAN POLICE
COG TITLE
S4,500
:60 HOUR ENTRY LEVEL TRAINING $1,500
160 HOUR NARCCTICS DETECTION TRAINING $2,000
:40 HOUR EXPLOSIVES DETECTION TRAINING $3,000
YEARLY MAINTENANCE CONTRACT PER DOG TEAM S 800
DISCOUNTS AVAILABLE FOR 5 OR MORE DOGS PURCHASED OR
TEAMS FOR MAINTENANCE TRAINING
ECARD:NC, _ EP �AY
$ 10
EQUIPMENT AS PER ENCLOSED PRICE LIST.
*ADDITIONAL.I, WE MUST CHARGE 6% SALES TAX CN DOGS AND EQUIPMENT.
Cur goals shall remain th.e.-:same, to provide
available :, the best
_ Police Service Dogs and training while continuing to
--vclve to a higher level in all areas relating to this very
minor_ant raw enforcement resource.
--lease have any
avid Re=ver�nJ
I-_e_nat:;_ na', Inc.
Enc,csures
POLICE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES
PRICE LIST
JULY 1, 1988
DOG TRAINING EQUIPMENT
2. German :.earner ?ants - :hro:ned Tanned (Fully Padded)
$2FI5.U0
3. German Protection Jacket - Chrome - Tanned Leather, Very Light & Flexible $ 275.00
29. German _ ._1�-oacced 2-�i�ce ?4ng cut; ( Fully protective/not lightweight)$1000.00
4. er a n ?acaed Sort Arm & Cover
$ 115.00
rman :.eat ner .._... .:it.. Plastic: .cp y Site Bar (Left or Right` C
� Y 149.00
$ 32.00
7. German Learner An - Chrome Tanned. Arm can be worn on right or left ; 149.00
8. German Jute Cover for Leather Arm - Chrome Tanned; long 33" $ 36.00
9. Ger:-.an Puppy Padded Aran & Cover (Leather tp/ ute.., added bottom) $ 89.00
10. German Mattie/Heavy Learner with Covered -Steel -Bar $ 147.00
11 a -� tier with . German -�z ..---tom=. =_ �� � --__ _ =cr :� 'w Covered Steel Ear & ?ads $ 160.00
_?. - _ �_��ve $ 45.00
uscab e s 35.00
14. _r -a.- 2rac..... Leash - . •_cn Rope _V' 8c1r Hook $ 15.00
13. _e:- o.. Le. tne_ =; ered .:_...: - . 4" _tick ,Steel top & Leather loop -pi -;ab 1e) $ 25.00
ermar ___ .. - =esu _ :ermar. _heonerds $ 15.00
17. �r-u .--=--�t :a :-- ear-. $ 25.00
6. German jute Cover, regular 2." `r o r
l
- $ 12.00
5.00
__.ss _.: Ke _..a_:. 3.00
5.00
_-- S 2.30
3.00
24. ,-a =c�..a_ _ _ 'k Reiea e �cas^-� crab e r
J �C'.^G't J' ?2.50
PAGE. 2
DOG TRAINING EQUIPMENT
23. :erman Quick Release 3'-3/4" Nylon Leash $ 10.00
26.-e=:ran Regular Bolt 3'-3/4" Nylon Leash S 8.50
27. ;;erman Quick Release 6'-3/4" Nylon Leash $ 12.00
23. :erman Sear:n Slack Nylon Combined Leash & Collar $ 10.00
30. -crman Pair of Rize Suit Arm Covers $ 42.00
31. Lerman Regular Solt 3/4" Nylon 12" Loop Traffic Leash $ 7.50
32. :erman kick F.elea._e 3/4" Nylon 12" Loop Traffic Leash $ 8.50
33. _er:nan Bamboo Training Stick $ 1.75
gal er Manx Cartridges ,5/6/15) by ? ob-eda..... 8.50
35. er^a^ - ._ =.ev:_:er .:or .22 caliber Elank Cartridges $ 60.00
7.1
.
___ns,
rotecti .
37. _erman
33.- aced
pair left and right lees for ankle
$ 36.00
:over _t^ three straps/24" for older Site Bar Arm $ 36.00
Sleeve, extended to cover `.ands Ray Alien
(RA10)...$ 65.00
39.- :..;.e ReguLar Zang _aced 2ndercover Sleeve S 65.00
...,ver Sleeve Ray -.i er -.1) S 48.00
BOOKS
165. "=^e =er'an ._.. :=C^ Sock" ty _..san Earwig S 39.95
161. Bock"_e..uz.on.und" .Pan 3arwig $ 15.00
163.
.� ._-_-.. ..- = e:•1 .. .moi tl
A?TC11!
_avid :Raver 4.00
4.00
PERSONAL. ITEMS
15
5.00
7.00
LEASHES
eau_ar _cit '-1"ir:g Nylon - Leash $ 10.50
45.-eaular Solt 6'-1" Double Nylon Leash $ 12.00
46. Regular 5oit -i" reacher Leash $ 13.00
47. Regular Edit 6-3/4" Leather Leash $ 10.75
48. Regular _ol„ -1/2" Leather Leash $ 9.50
49. Regular -cit 4'-1" Learner Leash
$ 10.50
50. Dcsxccil ''500" rucgage Quality Kennel
$ 67.00
51. ":.=.!Cocii "400" Lu.;gage duality Kennel$ 57.00
52. Leather Collar " to 26"
$ 6.50
53. :vion Collar 18" to 26" $ 6.00
_.. $ 8.50
EQUIPMENT FOR FIELD TRAINING
64. 5chutt-und Blinds made from Polyurethane coated nylon parack,
ao=_wnich _s weather resistant and far more durable than
cotton of ester; included are 3--z" metal poles with welded
metal spikes $ 75.00
65. Set of :,--3' Schutzhund Blinds, described in item *64 $435.00
HARNESS ANO EQUIPMENT FOR LIFTING & DROPPING DOGS
66. Rappelling/Swat Harness: rade with Qrre ply of ballistics
cloth sandwiched between two ply -of Polyurethane and using 2"
wecoi. _ with plastic side release buckles $ 50.00
67. :=raid" =12 Cord Rope/usable grade on spool $ 27.50
---s._i-= _i___i..s_s .:a_a.,_..r of too orade -tta_ $ 21.00
c9. 1:0' _-..chard' _ -- ? re tcp ;rade
$ 52.50
Roe top c:ade on =pool $150.00
ELECTRICAL TRAINING EQUIPMENT
5110.00
76. -� s_ ia_ :0/B.� $275.o0
5 40.00
7=. 13.00
79. . 3.00
30. E...,t 5-12 -and Prod
cc $ 21.00
31. - _kai i he _ .-Y 1 S
$ 1.60
__ l'ontweiont -_anti.. pistol like, _rte coeratec,
nigh .=„-n: .:ave dog repeiler (See enclosed onamphlet�
$ 35.00
DOG SUPPLIES AND MEDICATION
86.=.ecuiar :doper Scooper $ 13.50
37. rge ?ocper Scooper
$ 20.00
38. _ . -_a_nless 3zeel yowl
$ 5.50
39. - ,t. 5..ainiess Steel Ecwl
$ 6.50
90. _ _aszi,. .tater Hole $ 3.50
91. iasis:Cater F a'ucer
$ 6.50
92. T,ilmore :nater Nozzle $ 4.50
93. Iixit Water Faucet
$ 8.50
94. S l iker Erush
$ 7.50
- �a- seudocccaine \sold to licensed law enforcement agencies
only)
$ 10.00
96. -ia- _se.zdohercin sold to licensed law enforcement agencies
oni_; $ 10.00
97. Adam's i:, oz. Flea Off Spray $ 8.25
98. Adam's 12 cz. _lea Off Shampo0
$ 7.75
99. -._cr -_z ...co. Ear Cleaner R-7 $ 9.50
100. --- - 0_nt-e-r -
•czS 5.75
$ 7.75
__... .3 4.75
. -_ea .,_f Spray
$ 15.00
-04. - :c. $ 19.50
..a1
$ 7.75
DOG FOOD
143. 526.00
144. _.:�F :og
- __- _ `.
$33.80
14,;. .;y:,c.. _ -:, lb.gag 34.00
526.70
145. _.:.:C _ ' ,i aQ _
.70
.:.r. 526.70
- Z0-
FENCE SIGNS
'7:. -ear -c= _ - / -auci;;n Dog ' ead/ 10 x 12$ 5.00
AUTO SIGNS AND DECALS
l e = - .. _ndow .; ice Letters "Police Dog" Decal 3" .. =2" $ 15.00
115. 7_ac., :,lice _ecal- x 26" $ 10.75
- -, ; -_ K"' :acai x 27" $ 11.50
$ 12.00
1 1 - - .e "7---- :ecal x 20"
$ 13.75
11;. Red Re"-: e " _,eeo Away" Decal 3" x 27" $ 13.75
__`._. .--'_ :e ":- Decal . " x 3" $ 6.50
$ 7.50
,77 -._- 5 -ac k :c_ ' ,"
$ 6.00
_23.lack ' :..i:" :_ca_ 3Y' x 8 $ 6.50
_
124. Red =ems i " re " -auci n" Decal 31/2" x 20"
$ 12.00
125. Red =.ai' _ -rte ",aucicn" :ecal 5" x 27" 15.80
H_ac.. "Police ,a.._ne" _ecai -x 274-,_-.: $ 11.88
_.. .. _. .. :ecaLs_..r left ;Y right doors/Large S 12.00
:_-=_-. s :5:11-1t Coco. /Small 5 10.00
- -..tc, =a=.:._ _ _ Head, fcr ..:^es and ..u..lnesses 5 1.00
dozen 10.00
PINS
PAGE 5
_.00
8.30
5 5.00
8.00
E=HOPS T ' `JTEA NATI
.% � ONAL. NC.., avenue • R•.ersiee. Ca 92509 • 4-585-2430
s.RGEST PaIVATE DOLICE :rOG SCHOOL IN THE WORLD • IMPORTING • TRAINING • BREEDING • TRAINING EQUIPMENT
• OE:,=A^',11c5e,cc
—Z.7 — �I
Humans Rule the World, but Animals Push Its Buttons
By BILL BI1LITER,
Times Staff Writer
,'te` 25 years
bubittesii, Yijt
rieivs. 'Superstar
eTia
Latest case m point: Sid Vi ` . us. Sid, a
boa constrictor• inspired a me ' is
extravaganza earlier this month when he
underwent laser treatment for cancer of
the jaw: It may have been the biggest crush
of local radio, TV and newspaper
journalists in one place since former
• President Reagan's last visit to Orange
County.
Of course Reagan is big news. But a
snake named Sid Vicious?
Times Science writer Lee Dye says. it,
animal stories are a reporter's best friend. t
Though he has written hundreds of
thoughtful, incisive articles about the
mysteries of science and the universe, Dye
says fews of his stories have drawn such
wide response as his coverage.last October
of stranded whales off Point Barrow,
Alaska.
thg newspaper
ma velatthe•t
ttlltio[ to the
0
"It started as just a simple story of
Eskimo whalers trying to help some
stranded whales," he said. "Then it became
one of the biggest, craziest things you ever
saw. There were at least 100 news people
up there covering the story. It was lots of
fun.
"Hey, I like animal stories. Give me a
fuzzy animal story anytime. If I hada •
choice between an end -of -the -world story
and a frizzy animal story. I'd take the fuzzy
animal story."
Two of the biggest news stories ever to
come from Orange County involved
animals—a hon named Fraser and a
hippopotamus named Bubbles.
In 1972, Fraser became a national
sensation when Times reporter Gordon
La Angeles lima
Las Angela Than
Bubbles, top, while free after her
great escape; Sid Vicious, above left,
after surgery, and Fraser and friend.
Grant wrote a beguiling feature about an
old, bedraggled lion that had been given to
Lion Country Safari in Laguna Hills by a
Las Angeles T nee
Mexican circus. Fraser's age in lion years
was the equivalent of about 75 for a man.
"His ftlr was losing its luster, and his ears
were battered," Grant wrote.
But looks were deceiving, Grant noted.
Fraser was a ladies' man—a world-class
ladies' man. Female lions fought for him.
They protected him. One gave birth to a
baby sired by Fraser.
Grant wrote, "Fraser: A name that rings
paeans of hope in the hearts of many men
facing their later years but sounds doleful
gongs of frustration and despair in other
men, some quite young. A name that
among women, has, well...."
Fraser quickly became Orange County's
sex symbol.
In 1978, Grant wrote about Bubbles, a
hippopotamus that escaped from Lion
Country Safari and eluded captors for
almost 3 weeks. When finally found.
Bubbles was shot with a tranquilizer gun.
She collapsed in an awkward position and
died from the crush of her own weight.
International news media had picked up
Grant's first story of Bubbles' escape, and ' (I
the report of the animal's•death brought an
outpouring of grief.
"Her death touched off a phenomenon of
literally worldwide proportions," Grant
wrote.
Other animal stories have also captured
the public's fancy and sympathy.
In December I was among the Orange
County reporters writing about a missing
dog that belonged to a young retarded
woman in Huntington Beach. The story
had a happy ending: The dog was found.
"We got hundreds of phone calls, and
everyone seemed so interested," the young
woman's father said.
In a cynical world, it is good to be •
reminded that animble sometimes br ngoui
the best in people.
Perhaps even me. I have a deep and
abiding fear of snakes. But Sid Vicious is
the nicest snake I ever met. I hope he
recovers and lives a long, happy life.
LA Ylides 11—s—s
APO Officer Michael Longddar11ASO ts.r rn..
with his five-year partner. Duke.
Dyke Collared Mots Than 370Bad 6uys
Most Dogged Cop on L.A.
ForceGoingBlind, Retires
By JERRY BELCHER. Times Sorry Writer
A good coo—maybe the best
var to walk on four caws—was
--tired from tete [.os Angeles Police
-continent Friday with aopropn-
ate pomp and ceremony—plus a
'ew moments for hum to relax and
s:ay his tavonte game. which is
aong a rubber ball.
Duke. aid German
-neoherd. a member of
-.e department's Canine unit suite
181. ono during tus career. he's
ren stabbed. punched. kicked.
:rated and shot at.
But It was not murr or stress
tat faced Use debarment to place
ion on the retired list at the peak of
'u career. It was the fact that Duke
slowly going blind.
;tficer Michael Long. Duke's
▪ antler and handler since the
-,andsome black-and-tan dog
tuned the unit. tried to sound
w etiery stoical when he exolalned
:..at he's sufferurg from an ire -
.rape disease called ptogrenove
:nal airway..
He's cull got the desire to
work. " Lang said. "It's just that he's
gradually gong blond."
Long said the vete uw.a, who
discovered the disease during an
exa""nation last July predlctad
that los partner will be totaliY blind
by the end of the year.
Aamatant Pollee Chid Robert
venial' presided over Duke's re-
ur'tment ceremony Friday after-
noon n the roll -call room of Cen-
tral Station—and. for the benefit of
photographers. aphers. gladly let the retir-
ee give him a big wet kiss on the
cheek. a bbeety seldom If ever
permitted by a high-ranking offi.
cer of the depae.el't
In recounting Duke's record.
vernon called hon "the most suc-
cessful canine' 10 the history of
California.
-This dog. has
sir umoita' In over 370 felony ar-
rests r -
rests ... at a manpower savour of
over 26.000 hours. and that
amounts to a serum o of nearly a half
m1 tiondolars." Venom slue
Pleas sonPORCH. PVv3
* Saturday. November 8 1986/Pirt U y$
FORCE: Most Dogged Cop
Catid.aad tom Page I
Duke stood modestly at his
partner's side as the chid praised
Among other bad guys Duke
sniffed out (and anally aired mm
smt'mda'mg without a tight) woe
4 murderers—the lactone captured
during a chase on Halloween
night -6 roma 65 robbers. 214
buglers. 68 ear thieves. 7 amens
accred of a®alting police ofp-
cs . 3 hit -and -nun drivers and 2
=CCU=
For hi* work. Duke received 48
official commendations. not to
mouton cc to thef retirement deigned
presented
byVernon durum the ceremony.
Duke seemed ummpresed by
the chiefs praise or the certificate
But he did perk up when someone
brought a big rubber ball into the
room and tossed it out for Duke to
retrieve. Dmptte his failing eye-
sight he aught it on the bounce
and brought it back to his master
with kis tad wagging happily. Long
explained that Duke's biggest 'Anil
.n ufe is "a pat on the baa" after
=atcbmg a crook. and a chance to
play bring-back-the-balL
Long himself will keen his de-
partmental 9.4 when hr'snewdE9gmum of K-
9-4 another
German shepherd named Yeager.
replace Duke in about a month.
But Duke's official department
badge. E920. will be permanently
retied with the dog.
As he has has neer be 1dnagete
department at the age oPPI3
months. Duke will embus Mattie
in a kennel in the Ud°d
Long's home in LaVeene. !.
with Duke. will beghaa nointineng
vacation today.
When Long returns to wail hN
new partner will have
Ws Warning. ha And
Yeager
hare gutru
DuLong cud he bks Yeagetggbdog is nimbi alter test pilot Make
Yeager—pmt tine but e iallear
that for Mm. Doke will aiwalt be
the acacias. ray:
nor,
L.A. Prison on lana■ry
Agenda for LL'gislatjlp
Senate Peesideir Pro Te eibavid
A. Roberti (D -Loa Angdeigienid
Friday that the (oweeetvvdrover building a state proton Idles
lsos
Angeles County should
with in January when the *few
Leipalatme convenes. ..
The downtown Los Angers
prism proposal favored by Gov.
George Denineepan ie umeinitop
in elect+electionpolitis wharlo4
Senate Demoaar refuted Wr 1 -
pmt it Roberti said be Intimate
wort with supporters of the prkies
between now andlanitery, .;.v,.
r::r.
I
PVE officer Hall won't
`He was the best
partner I ever hal'
By Kristina Horton
STAFF WRITER
Palos Verdes Estates Police Offi-
cer Joe Hall will never forget the
night that his partner — police dog
Falk — leaped through the open
window of a nearby car and rescued
him from a knife -wielding attacker.
Hall escaped harm that night.
The suspect's other victim — a kid-
napped and sexually molested 14 -
year -old boy — was pulled to safe-
ty. And Falk once again became the
tail -wagging German shepherd of-
ten seen around town at Hall's side.
But last week, five years after
joining the police force, the 9 -year-
old dog suffered a heart attack and
died in a speeding police car en
route to the hospital.
"He was the best partner I ever
had. That's the way I considered
him," said Hall, the dog's handler.
"He didn't have a mean bone in
his body when it came to people.
He had another job to do at times."
"On a given day, I would have 20
or 30 people come up and ask about
him — small kids and big kids as
well," Hall said.
In one of his scrapbook photos,
Hall's police car is so crammed with
preschool children trying to pet
Falk that the dog can barely be
seen peeking out through the crowd
of youngsters.
But Falk, born in Germany and
trained in Bakersfield, ferreted out
48 fleeing suspects during his ca-
reer.
And during one search in Carson,
Hall said, the dog went after an
armed suspect under a motor home
and was temporatily blinded by a
deputy's gunfire while pulling the
struggling man out. Even the dog's
whiskers were burned off by ex -
forget Falk
ploding gun powder.
But, Hall said, Falk "didn't hesi-
tate one bit."
Since the dog's death Wednesday
afternoon, local residents and police
from around the South Bay have
been calling in their condolences,
Hall said.
He and Falk often patroled on
foot and in the car around local
school campuses, but they also went
on searches as far away as Carson
and Long Beach.
Local police officers and fire-
fighters gathered Thursday to bury
the dog.
And the same day, with one po-
lice dog remaining at the depart-
ment, City Manager Gordon Siebert
gave the go-ahead for to buy anoth-
er dog at a cost of 35.000.
Hall said he will be looking for a
dog with "the same temperament as
Falk, as close as possible."
PVE Police Officer Joe Hall and his late
partner — police dog Falk.
-
Canine Un is
Patron Aleets
Stand -In Hero
Wull, hello thele. ImndbOrtte,"
La Verne Wheeler of Santa Ana
finally got a chance to say to
Vasko, a dog she bought for
Santa Ana police as a
replacement for a German
shepherd that had to be
destroyed in January because of
a degenerative hip ailment.
Officer Mike Fleet rejoined the
canine unit with Vasko Sunday
and accepted a surprise offer
Tuesday from Wheeler of $5,500
for yet another dog to replace
another dl dog.
IKON ht 1'.1N 1.to.
l4
ir Part II / Saturday; February 13. 1988 R
t
Police Dog
ti
Dies the Day
Before His
Duty Began
1
1
By JESS BRAVIN.
Times Staff Writer
:Barely a month after
death of a beloved Santa
!police dog prompted an
pouring of public support
sympathy, another can
crime stopper has been
-stroyed because of medical
cessity, authorities said Fri
the
Ana
out -
and
ine Boris von Ratsteinfels
Be-
ne- life had been een spent in training
at a Riverside kennel. There.
This time, the loss was fe
Newport Beach, where
west member of that ci
lice canine unit. Boris
tsteinfels, was destroyed
ter suffering an intestinal
that probably was caused
the. stress of training, said
er Bob Oakley, a pol
kesman.
It in Boris and Milius would spend
the each day learning the essen-
ty's tials of canine police work.
von Police dogs such as Boris are
af- frequently used to track sus -
in
ju- pests. Milius said. •
by The officer said that getting
Of
Boris to attack was easy.
ice Training him to restrain him-
_ self when dealing with a pas-
t' sive-suspect was another mat -
of ter, though.
oth
Boris' death last Saturda
came just weeks after that
Conrad von Biskirchen, an
er German shepherd who. in
five years on the Santa Ana
force. had taken part in more
than 100 arrests.
But 3 -year-old Boris von
Ratsteinfels. whose Teutonic
name stemmed from a whelp -
hood spent in the kennels of
Germany, never had the
chance to serve. He died a day
before he was to begin his
patrols with Officer Gary.Mil-
ius. an 11 -year Newport Beach
police veteran who was begin-
ning his first assignment as a
dog handler.
"We had just finished train-
ing, and the next day he dies on
me." said Milius. 34.
y said police had . de-
ayed announcing Boris' death
to give Milius "some time to
adjust" to the loss.
Bons. despite his untimely
eath. hadbecome part of the
Milius family during his short
sojourn in Orange County.
Since Dec. 15. Boris had lived
with Milius in his Huntington
Beach home. becoming a spe-
cial friend of the officer's 3 -
ear -old son. Joshua.
"He loved him." Milius said.
He played with him all the
—time."
The last friar mnn4e ..o
."We worked on obedience
every' -day," Milius said. "The
dog has to obey you and only
you, even if it means stopping
him from doing something he
really wants to do. like attack
someone.
"We want the dog to be more
than a biting machine." Milius
said.
In an official statement. the
Newport Beach Police Depart-
ment said that "Boris' loss was
immediately felt by the depart-
ment, where his two German
shepherd predecessors have
established a track record of
reliability, safety and excel-
lence. The Police Department
intends to replace Boris as soon
as possible once the funds are
located to pay the costs. of a
new dog."
Oakley said the dog, which
cost the department $4.500,
may have been injured while in
training, but police were not
holding the kennel or anyone
else responsible.
"When a dog is in a training
environment, it's sort of a
stressful situation." Oakley
said. "I don't think it could
have been prevented. Nobody
had a clue that this would
Postscript_
1
Z. R R
Hard -Nosed Cop Back on the Job, Sniffing Out Crime
Hy NAN('Y WHII)h.Times Stall Writer
Since his return to the force after being njured,
I Iuntiugton Beach Police Officer Briat idrick's
partner really has been spoiled with al he hero
business
"You really can't see touch of a scar un his lose.
and everybody's been pretty amazed about that,"
Tidrick said. "Ile gets even more attention now."
Of his partner, Rex, Ti.lnck added: "Ile kind of
stares at then( until they give him food. The guys
have been feeding him pieces of cookies in briefing
Ile's a tough old dog."
❑
Fora tense moment last November, however, it
looked as though Rex's days of biscuits and
Alpo— not to mention catching criminals—were
over.
It was a rather unlikely injury that threatened to
scuff out the career of Iluntington Beach's only
drug -sniffing canine, a 100 -pound German shepherd
that has nabbed his share of narcotics and fleeing
criminals.
Returning from a burglar -alarm call at an
Indust rial budding last Nov. 6, Tidrick let Rex out of
the car to run through some drills on a grassy patch
at the McDonnell Douglas Space Center. While
Tidrick fetched a leash from his patrol car.
7 -year-old Rex roamed about 25 feet away to a
service road Moments later. Rex was run over by a
car.
"The first part of 'Hex!' came out of my mouth; he
turned to look at me and got clobbered," Tidrick
recalled. "The cadwent right over him. Ile
disappeared underneath. Then he popped out the
back end Amazing.. The left side of his nose was
completely flat. l knew it was broken, and he had a
hole on the side of it."
11
Tidrick said he accepts partial blame for the
accident. "I would have been a little irritated had he
run off after I'd told him to heel. But I'd just sort of
said, 'Come on. let's go.' "
Tidrick, whose only part ner of the four -leg variety
has been Rex, had worked for three or four years as a
veterinary assistant before becoming a cop. The
experience came in handy.
He wrapped a towel around Rex's broken snout
before driving him to a nearby animal hospital.
Because the vet's assistant had lett for the day,'
Tidrick helped the doctor pull pieces of tissue pot of
the dog's nasal passage and wire it back together. He
took the pooch home and then waited for the verdict,
taking a vacation for a few weeks himself.
During the recovery. a reporter asked Tidrick's
boss for permission to photograph Rex, who was
intermittently wearing a plastic cone resembling an
Elizabethan collar to protect the injury. "It looks like
the old boy's going to make it," the canine unit
supervisor said, but he denied the request in the
interest of Rex's dignity.
"I'm sorry," I.t. Michael Higgs added, half joking.
"Ile's been wearing the cone thing a lot. We wouldn't
let you take a picture of him with the cone thing on
because of the humiliation of it."
After weeks of recuperating, the veterinarian last
month issued his verdict: Hex's sniffer could still
sniff.
And so it was that on Jan. 8. Rex climbed back on
his perch—a customized rear seat in Tidrlck's patrol
car, equipped with a water bowl, a rubberized flatbed
and scores of paw scratches on the upholstery, a
legacy of his many rides.
It was in that same seat that Tidrick realized that
November day that his pal was going to survive, if
not return to his glory days as Huntington Beach
drug -sniffing canine.
"When he sat up in the back seat and was licking
his chops," Tldrick recalled with a grin, "I knew he
was going to be OK."
Now, things are jyvt about back to normal, Tidrick
said. "He's already been out on a dope [marijuana;
case, so we're basically back in business."
AURELIO JOSE BARRF.RA / Los Angeles 'Ititldia
Brian Tidrick with Rex, who's back on the jof ,
- —bra
Rl i'ersiide School
Trains Dogs to Take
a Bite Out ofCrime
MP'
Wearing protective gear, Officer Gill Moberly gets dog to attack him while standing in water
sprinkler, an exercise that teaches the animal to go after a suspect despite obstacles.
IVtSI{Slid ti.uiDiego Police Officer
Hick Widner knelt at the entrance to a
cave where a robbery suspect was hiding,
turned to his new partner and said "Plods!"
His partner, Ilcnno—a police dog that Widner
' calls an "alligator with fur"—immediately
responded to the Dutch command for "sit at
heel."
"This is the San Diego police! Come out or I'll
send the dog In!" Widner shouted.
Falling to gel a response, Widner uttered the
word for "search," and the 80 -pound Malinois
,. bolted into the darkness. Seconds later, Widner
heard the muffled sound of his dog barking and
the cries of the suspect he had cornered.
The "arrest" was actually a training exercise
•• , ! at Adlerhorgt Inteniatlonal, near Glen Avon in
, • Riverside County. It is the largest private police
.. dog -handler training school in the world.
More than 80 law enforcement agencies
throughout the nation use dogs trained at
' ' Adlerhorst. These agencies Include the U.S.
Immigration and Naturalization Service, Los
• Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Orange
' •County Sheriff's
Department and
police departments
In San Diego, Santa
Ana, Ventura, West
Covina and Downey.
The dogs are trained
to ignore gunfire at close range and to bypass a
;•• raw steak to track down the scent of heroin.
'' : Adlerhorst specializes in teaming officers and
"'' dogs. Partnerships are based on personality '
` profiles provided by each officer. The school uses
mostly 2 -year-old German shepherds and
' i Malinoia that are pretrained in Europe and,
• therefore, respond to Dutch or German
commands that must be learned by their .
American handlers.
As partners, a handler and his dog train
together in a 120 -hour program that some have'
compared to military boot camp. In training, •
• handlers learn to "read" their dog's behavior and
anticipate the animal's moves. The doge become
unerringly loyal to their handlers.
The school favors the so called
"search -and -bark" method, In which the dog
locates and then corners a Suspect until its •
handler arrives. The dogs bite a suspect only it
' ,: he runs or attacks the handler.
—LOUIS SAHAGUN
Photos by
JAYNE KAMIN-0NCEA
I.os Angeles Times
During another training exercise, dog crawls
through a pipe and is then lowered by ropes to
search for suspect in an underground tunnel.
24 • The Beach Reporter • July 21, 1988
Canine officer Kay Vom Emsbogen
(photo by Ed Medlock)
Canine officer mourned
Monday July 18. retired Manhattan
Beach Police Department canine Kay
Vom Emsbogen passed away. Since his
retirement in January of this year. Kay
has lived with his handler, Dave Fer-
gusowand family in their Manhattan
Beach home.
Kay was purchased with funds do-
nated by the residents and business per-
sons of Manhattan Beach.
Dunng Kay's five -plus years of service
to the citizens of Manhattan Beach. he
was involved in more than 250 building
ana area searches and responsible for
more than 350 arrests.
Kay was forced to retire due to a pro-
gressiveiy worsening medical condition.
He will be missed by his family at home
and at the Manhattan Beach Police De-
partment.
Goodbye. Kay.
K-9 Unit's 'Granddaddy' Retires
j -�
Dogged Dirk Has His Day of Glory
By 1.AtlitA KUR•1LMAN. Tomes staff Writer
e had risked his life more times than
any of his comrades on the .' nta
Ana police force could remt er.
And admiring officers from police age les
throughout Orange County turned o for
his retirement party Tuesday at Santa ria
pollee headquarters
A couple of honorary plaques sat on a
table next to the going away ptescuts in
the second -floor officers' lounge. Santa
Ana Police Officer Dennis Scott was begin-
ning to get a lump in his throat as he
contemplated saying goodby to his partner
for the past 21/2 } ears, Dirk Von der
Schlossniuhle
"It's just been the hest duty assignment
I've ever had," Scutt said, adding that he
will switch to the investigative division
rather than start all over with a new
partner. "I'd lust rather end it with him."
Dirk looked up at his partner, licked his
chops and let out a yawn. The granddaddy
of the Santa Ana Police Department's
canine unit, refreshed after a month of
unlimited dog food and napping on the
couch, showed none of his partner's nostal-
gia.
And why should he? After three-quar-
ter, of .i lifetime sniffing out had guys, one
could :.afely say is been a dog's life for
Dirk.
lie 1145 Jumped ,through a patrol car
window to save Scott from an attacking
`It's just been the best duty
assignment I've ever had.1'd
just rather end it with him.'
—Officer Dennis Scott
criminal Ile has kept at bay a robbery
suspect armed with a nail -studded board,
despite repeated and bloody blows to the
nose. Ile once helped make five felony
arrests in single day.
In his 6'4 years of active duty. Dirk has
helped officers catch some 190 criminals,
more than any other police dog in the
county, according to Santa Ana Police Sgt.
Raul Luna, head of the department's canine
unit.
"Ile can sniff doors that are closed and
tell you if somebody is behind 'them',"
Luna said in a voice full of admiration.
"Ile's lust had a steady, active career here
at the department."
Hut in all those years and with all that
pressure, hadn't Dirk ever bitten the wrong
person?
"We're nut going to get into that," Luna
snapped "Thu is a retirement party."
Scott, who has kept the 81/2 -year-old
Dirk at home since they became partners
and will care for him in his retirement, was
more forthcoming.
"Ile bit me twice," he said with a grin.
"Once in the leg and once in the stomach."
That was when the two first met, Scott
said. "Now, he wouldn't do that for the
world."
Scott said the grizzled but still able Dirk
has adjusted without a hitch to his new life
in retirement, which is more than Scott can
say for himself.
When the plaques had been read and the
shiny new doggie dish presented, a call of
"Speech!" rang through the room.
Dirkave a dignified stare.
But Scott ducked his head as his eyes
fulled with tears. He pulled on Dlrk's leash
and croaked, "Naw, I'll talk to you all
later."
DAM YURONAKA / Los Angeles Times
Dirk, the retiring Santa Ana police dog, took it all in stride—and with a yawn.
• s
Daily Breeze
FRIDAY
Sectemoer 30. 1988***
Communitie
'muscat-- r
wndvw..±::>sieh,
agwsMgR with- Bons, says the dog.
suffer from the lob's 'ups and donna." ' •
Redondo Beach
police dog unit is
1 of state's best
By •err lams
Boomer. Bear. Boni. and d Mika
could be considered the pet pow
work ey are young. train dai-
1, work � ..d
dm o. drop doughnut crumbs in the car
ate..
However, their fellow Redondo Belt
officers have with their
barking. slobbering and flees. shrill
The five 'officers° four German
ahepbards and a Labrador retriever —
compose half the department's canine
unit patrolling city streets with their hu-
man partners between 7 p.m. and 6 a.m.
The Bedoudo Beech canine .unit is not
unique, but the four German shepherds
bonnet ` patrol are as .om.
In May. the demeanor
took second pleae overall in the state's
second
memberP�s DogCompetition. The fifth
k
Labrador retrier. squad. the South Bay's Bay's
only drug.eniffing dog.
Detective Paul /fallings. canine unit
training officer. said the dog team is good
because the human officers are
You only get the highest caliber of offi-
cers working in the canine unit because
only highly mouvated officers are willing
to tram the dogs daily," he said.
The dogs work out on an obstacle
course and field behind the California
water Services building off Torrance
Boulevard in Redondo Beach. There the
four shepherds practice obedience. search
techniques. biting ane running the obsta-
cle course.
Training 'laborious'
The obedience training is the 'most
labonous.' Hellinga said. The dogs don't
forget the walking, trotting and etoppmg
techniques they've been practicing since
birth. but without practice. they do get
rusty. he said.
Still. Hellinga admitted. officers don't
always look forward to the practice.
"But you can't show the dog that.*
Hellinga said. "[f the dog picks up that
the handler doesn't want to do the agar -
trees, then he won't want to do them.'
The
tr man. commands a dog to heal, the dog feels tfmatdop will be commode& to corns*
tall
Beneath
ha all the jumping.pkyaml►y dogs.he aid. comae dig so, hs maid. a gsaaf. but not bite unless elenehed.
Vis. a running and Just. a shooting a suspect is a flail When a dog has to bite, he le trained to
dog must Lara to trust its resort for homes officers. amine cone,... Omni, hid the =m...*
sea sasonswrevs rvemotwver
Kea Breedeef, above. seeds Bads in pursuit of Tim Stark, a publd- qty
officer playing the role of a fleeing criminal. Below, Boomer obits'. Stark
during
an exercise ktvoWing a simulated search and sacape.
Canine
herds bite with approximately
1,200 p
relatively
per square inch,
Y light compared to a
Rottweiler's 2,000 pounds per
square inch. The softer bite re-
sults in a small puncture and a
bruise — one of the reasons s
German shepherds were chosen
by the Redondo Beach officers
instead of the Rottweilers, Do- b
berman pinschers, and Malinois e
used by other departments,
Hellinga said.
Since the program began in
1978, no canine unit officer has
sustained serious injury when
his dog partner was present. No
dog has ever been killed in the
line of duty.
This year alone, Redondo
Beach canines have assistedin
making 169 felony arrests and
432 misdemeanor collars.
They've participated in 410
building and area searches and
backed -up officers 3,564 times.
The dogs are retired after
three to five years of active du-
ty, Hellinga said. Although
there are no statistics to prove
it, canine handlers agree the life
span of a police dog is shorter
because of stress.
Stress comes mostly from the
constant "ups and downs" of
the job, Greenleaf said.
"When they're out of the car
and we're arresting someone,
they're on red alert. Then when
thminspect is handcuffed and
thrown in the back of the car, half
it's over and they can calm go
down. That can happen 10, 15
FROM PAGE B
times a night."
The stress also comes from
being awake and alert for 10
hours and from adjusting to the
patrol car's speed and turns, of-
ficers say. "Or they just get
tressed by people, just like of-
ficers do," Hellinga said.
Over the years, man and his
est friend tend to become
notionally attached. Scot
McCallon's partner, Boomer,
can be seen resting his tired
head on McCallon's shoulder
near the end of a shift, the offi-
cer said.
But even though McCallon
may stop for coffee and dough-
nuts, Boomer doesn't get a crul-
ler for a midnight snack. "It's
bard not to spoil them," McCal-
lon said. He said restaurateurs
on the Redondo Beach pier are
infamous for cooking entire
steaks for Boomer — but
McCallon must turn down the
offers.
"If he had steak. he wouldn't
eat
s regular food for a week,"
heDinner time for all the doge
is breakfast time for their part-
ners — 5 a.m. Most get a high -
protein food available only from
pet stores and then canned
food, but like people, dogs can
be finicky eaters.
After trying one thing after
another. McCallon said Boomer
finally settled on dry food and
a can of chicken pans. "I
t a health -conscious dog,"
McCallon said.
2. - Associated Press
In the line of duty—Handler Robert Weber
with Aaron at Vienna airport. Search dog injured
paw digging in _the rubble of Armenia. Foreign
rescue teams on Thursday began leaving the
quake -devastated region. (Story on Page 42)
54 fart I i Sunday, December 25, 1988 R *
Officer Loses Canine Sidekick; Lasso Dies at Age 7
Iiy MICIIAl1. J. YBAItHA, Times Staff Writer
He was a model police officer.
"He'd work till he dropped if you'd ask
him," said a fellow cop, who called him
"exceptional."
In five years on the force, police said he
caught 174 felons without ever using a gun.
He sniffed them out; sometimes he bit them,
too.
Lasso, one of the Los Angeles Police
Department's original batch of canine cops, is
dead at 7. That's about 50 in human years.
The dog had just finished making a training
film late Thursday when his handler/partner
became concerned about Lasso's listless be-
havior.
Officer Kerell Broussard took the animal to
a veterinarian who found blood in his lungs.
Lasso was undergoing treatment when he
died. Death was probably due to a tumor,
Broussard said.
Broussard, who had lived with Lasso since
they went through a 12 -week training course
together five years ago, took it hard.
"It's the same thing as if his partner died or
someone in his family died," Officer Richard
Rockhold said.
15 Dogs on Force
Lasso was among the 15 dogs in the
department who search for suspects; others
work as bomb -sniffers or narcotic finders.
After a successful career, Lasso was going
to retire this year and spend his twilight years
as Broussard's pet. "He was going to become
one of the family," the handler said, in an
emotion -choked voice.
The dogs live at home with their trainers
and travel in specially equiped police cars,
replete with water and fan.
"He got along well with everyone," Sgt.
Jerry Thomas said. "lie was a very friendly
dog; but when it came time to work, he
worked."
The black and brown, 70 -pound German
shepherd, like all the dogs in the unit, was
paid for by the West L.A. Boosters, Thomas
said. A young "cadet" was already in training
to replace Lasso.
The new recruit will have large paw prints
to fill. Broussard said Latina often attacked
suspects as they tried to assault the officer.
"He's come to my aid'numerous times," he
said.
In the training film shot just before his
death, Lasso demonstrated how dogs guard
their masters.
"That's the last thing he did, showed how a
dog protects his handler," Broussard said.
"You could tell he was out of it. He was only
performing because I asked him."
Suspect Caught
by a Dog Slips -
Leash on Police
A robbery suspect who
couldn't elude a police dog
managed to escape from his
human captors Tuesday
while being treated for dog
bites at a hospital, Santa
Ana police said.
Eric Moore had been
captured under a house on
West Cubbon Street by a
police dog after Alfredo
Torrez, 36, flagged down
officers and said two men
had taken his wallet and
two gold rings, according to
Maureen Thomas, a police
spokeswoman.
Moore, who was bitten
several tunes during his
capture, was taken to
Western Medical Center at.
about 4:30 a.m., where he
disappeared.
"We're investigating
how he got away," Thomas
said. "Some of our officers
were present, but he man-
aged to escape at some
point when being examined
for his bite injuries."
A 17 -year-old boy ar-
rested with Moore was also
treated for dog bites and
taken to Juvenile Hall.
5
d
/ A Roundupof Southern outhern California News
litatikAIVAAVAkiil
latUMMIIMMIV
NVONNI\\\\,\\\O\N1/4. ..
\ASL\V4Z.N. Vek
Mane
Street,
San. Diego
Waiting in line on a
one -horsepower vehicle
seems to sit well with Officer
James Ackley of the San Diego
Police Department's mounted
patrol. Ackley was sitting on
his high horse recently at a
McDonald's while patrolling
El Cajon Boulevard. Ackley
was picking up some alfresco
lunch for himself and fellow
hbtlge guy Sgt. Leon Timm
3ARBARA MARTIN
Los Angeles Times
`You can't see five officers in a
crowd, but you can see a
horse.' —craw -rider Oen Feat
Policeman Will Sit
Tall in Saddle Today
By SANTIAGOO'DONNELL. TimesSta(f Writer
The rookie looked poised, even
ru$ as he went through his final
dress rehearsal before his first
assignment He seemed unamused
and always under control as he
marched by strangers to the sound
of cbcktng cameras.
The real test for Lumpy will be
today. at the Tet festival m Santa
Ana's CentennW Park. where he
• The Vietnamese cOe w Isty
will ring in KB new year. Orange
County life. Paige 10.
wW be assigned to patrol duty. If
everything goes well. he has a good
chance of landing a full-time poli
with the Santa MO Police Depart-
Tent-
Not
epart-
mentNot that he needs one. Lumpy
;Ives a comfortable life away from
• he spottlght in his Huntington
Beach stable. He gets (ed. cleaned
ind ridden every day. But today.
Lumpy and his partner Niekie will
`.ecome the first horses to wear the
•eitow ani blue Insignia of the
-arra Ana Mounted Police Patrol.
While the Sheriffs Department
has used horses for years. Santa
Ana is the first Orange County
when deoartmnent 10 recent history
deploy a mounted patrol.
rhe person who knows him best
Z`1
believes that Lumpy. a handsome
white Belgian draft can sense the
Importance of today's occasion,
"He's very sennuve—no doubt
that he picks up our anaety and
excitement." said owner-nder Dan
Felix. a Santa Ana police sergeant-
Felix
ergeantFelix is convinced that such
horses as Lumpy. beside; adding
color to festive celebnuon;. are
highly efficient crime preventers.
FeFelix. does the Job of five foot patrol
°Ulcers
.'You auk see five officers in a
crowd. but you can see a horse .. .
(besides' horses can do their
eight-hour shifts without getting
tired. For an officer. that's a lot of
work.' -
Felix got the Ida of forming a
mounted patrol about two yens
ago. almost immediately after his
wife. Linda paid 1500 for Lumpy,
then a sick 4 -month-old colt
"He was skinny. had big eyes.
big bones and swollen knees. so 1
called him Lumpy, and the name
stuck. We had to hand -feed burn for
more than a month. but he pulled
through." Felix said. The officer
wore his uniform and proudly
sported a black cowboy hat Friday
as he rode Lumpy Western-style.
"He's the giant pony we all
dream of having as kids." he said
dt&Tt•1®eestoiAngeorTines
Dan Felix pats Lumoy after a nde et Huntington Crest stables.
while teatime Lumpy into a tali,
trot
Like the other six officers enlist-
ed in Santa Ana s part-time horse
urut. Felix pays about 1250 for the
care and maintenance of his horse.
which he considers more of a pet
than a piece of equipment "You
can't pet a truck or a Peep. but
horse are lust big lovable am -
mals." he saki
The patrol is stili in its fnemauve
stage. lts members. who have been
Please ass ELT. Page 8
TET: Police Team Rides Today
Continued from Page:i
raining for over a year. roe to -
_ether every week. Felix said that
they get good reacuons from the
' vpenmental patrols. he wilt ask
'tie Police Department to create a
.ermanent horse unit.
'..nta Ana Police Chief Clyde L.
_ ronkhite is a oehever alreaay.
have used horses before our.
rte the ILos Angelest Olympics.
Ina they were very veru ef(ec.
• .:e.' he said Fnday. "I'd like to
-ave a permanent unit. but we
...Quid need some community fund.
for that. It can let expensive.
2estdes the care and feeding, these
-.arses need somal training.
The kev to the Douce horse
• naming. Felts said. is getting the
.almals accustomed to strange
41205 and Sights. sucn as gun-
-ots. smoke and balloons.
':Jute Of this scares Lunov. his
wner said. "He Tikes humans even
more than horses. and the only
enthing
gh. the minute Lumhe reacts to is py set foot
on the field for has pracuce ride. he
2e M A....._ __ _
;rasa. And then another. And an-
•,tner.
dv only concern for tomorrow
is that the Park aria Rec oeoote wilt
comotatn that he's eating all the
marts. • Felts sant as ne tried 10 bull
Lumov away Iron the nusnes.
'-Lnutes latertoe team was Dace
the stable. Contrary to wnat one
..ght expect from a :educated
Tyner. Felix ltd not rewaro Lumov
...tat a tum° of sugar.
don't like feeding him sweets.
•aid Felix. "because when ne s on
-e field. vnu son t nee to see nim
•,hing things from strangers.
one said that oouce wore was
ithout its sacrifices.
neOmnlna or tae I•ietnamese
• Yenr wed he (e0rdten tnaab
[ver .iunda5 at ounce Arias Con -
-nnial Park at JuuO W Edinger
•+ a restturl hours are its a.m. to 11
Wage and Y a.m. to 9 P.m.
Sunday. The annual Tet feshusl
saluting the new lunar year is
sponsored by the Onion of Vietnam-
ese &indents Assn. of
,v)
Mountingan�Effort
AgainstDrug Scen e
Santa Ana Police Chief Clyde
Cronkhite, at 1100 block of
Brook Street, announces new
mounted patrol program.
Mounted police Wednesday be-
gan a high -visibility campaign to
iml drug dealers Inc Santa Ana
ighborhood where children
y "hide-and-seek" with gags
arijuana.
olice Chief Clyde Cronkhite
sa d the horseback officers would
help police "retake" the neigh-
borhood along the 1100 block of
Brook Street from drug dealers
and buyers who brazenly conduct
business during daylight hours.
"The kids play a game called
'hide the marijuana,"' Cronkhite
said during a news conference.
"This is no way for our young
people to grow up.
"People in this neighborhood
have said the children are fright-
ened of the police, but they seem
to like the horses."
About two dozen smiling chil-
dren crowded around Wednesday
and began waving as one horse,
Lumpy, trotted past.
Cronkhite said the four horses
involved in the anti-drug pro-
gram are owned and maintained
by four officers who have volun-
teered for the assignment. Each
officer and horse received special
training./ / Lae Angeles Times
Police Officer Dan Felix rides Lumpy, his Belgian draft horse, through troubled Santa Ana neighborhood as rresidents observe.
' T 1 lel E 5 -�
S.F.Horse Patrol Rounds Up Support
SAN FRANCISCO (A—Comedi
an Michael Pritchard, armed wi
17,028 signatures, Wednesday led
horseback charge on City Hall
save the nation's second -old
mounted patrol from budget cuts.
"We have to now speak for the
horses." Pritchard said. "And as
Mr. Ed would say, 'Weee're ready
to take on the maaayor.' "
Jokes aside. Pritchard and other
supporters of the city's 114 -year-
old Mounted Patrol Unit say it is
important to save a tradition that
also provides an important function
in policing parks and controlling
crowds during demonstrations.
The petitions, gathered in three
- weeks, are aimed at putting a
th non-binding policy statement on
a the November ballot to persuade
to the city to maintain the mounted
est patrol. The only older police horse
– unit in the country is in New York
Cit
y, which began three years
earlier in 1871.
San Francisco Police Sgt. Ed
Edney, a nine-year veteran of the
mounted patrol, said the unit has
been trimmed to 21 horses and 14
officers, down from 30 horses and
21 officers a few years ago.
For this year, _at least, the
mounted patrol is- safe from the
budget -cutters, but its future re-
mains uncertain.
Southland / A Roundup
of Southern California News
BORIS YARO / Los Angeles Tomes
Marty Grangetto, equestrian supervisor for the
mounted patrol stables, inspects candidate.
Ready for Mane Events
Mounted Police
Are Saddling Up
By IiIS'l'IIER SCI1ItA1)Elt, 7'i tries Staff Writer
LUS ANGELES—Manes swaying and ears erect, six horses
in various shades of chestnut and bay backed out of a van
and onto the grounds of the Los Angeles Police Depart-
ment's 3- week -old mounted unit headquarters.
The horses were there to try out for jobs with the Police
Department, but Officer Nancy Reeves, watching them go through
their paces, was having a hard time deciding among them.
"My problem is, I like them all," she said. "I'm so excited at this
whole thing. We've worked so hard and fought so hard to get this
unit started and now it's happening. This is what it's all about."
It is In months after the Los Angeles Police Departrinent,
bolst.eaed by a $495,000 grant. from the Ahmanson Foundation,
approved a proposal to create a frill -time amounted patrol. And, at
last, the unit is well on its way.
The stables on the banks of the Los Angeles River just outside
Griffith Park are complete. The training ring is built. The 16
officers so far assigned to the unit are testing horses bought by the
40 Horses Planned
By next July, when the unit is scheduled to be fully operational,
there should . be 40 horses. The officers, drawn from riders
throughout the department, will total 32. And Los Angeles—after
years of talks about a full-time unit that went nowhere until the
Ahmanson Foundation got into the act—will join the more than 100
cities nationwide that have full-time tnounted patrols.
Along with the grant from the philanthropic group—enough to
buy the site of the former Los I"eliz stables and outfit what a large
sign out front proclaims as "The Ahmanson Equestrian Facili-
ty"—the Los Angeles City Council has earmarked $729,0(0 to
establish the unit, $80.0t10.4 which is budgeted to buy the horses.
The police officers, who have left everything from traffic patrols
to detective units to join the patrol, say the money was wisely
spent because the unit will help fight crime. While acknowledging
the horses will be a great public relations tool, they say the unit is
not just for show.
"Most people don't come up and pet a police car, but they love to
come up and say hi to a horse," said Lt. Dave Aikens, who heads
the unit. "But these are not ceremonial horses.... They have.a
tremendous presence. They have tremendous mobility, visibility.
Plus they're intimidating. Gang members don't like us."
Even -Tempered Mounts
Because of the distractions the horses are likely to encounter on
patrol, the department is buying only quarter horse geldings,
animals. that are generally sturdily built and even-tempered,
Aikens said. The department also requires the horses be of a dark
color so they will be uniform and between 5 and 12 years old.
The unit is already assigned to patrol the busy Broadway
shopping district downtown daily between Thanksgiving and
Christmas. Police divisions throughout the city have requested the
unit's services after that, Aikens said. Aikens said that after all 32
officers are hired, he will he able to send about 16 officers on daily
patrol.
The mounted patrol will man major special events and control
large crowds, Aikens said. But the patrol can also be used in
missing -person searches in rugged terrain not easily covered by
police vehicles. Officers on horseback can also more easily patrol
areas where narcotics are bought and sold. such as Venire Beach
and MacArthur Park, the said
Replaces Volunteers
The full-time unit will replace the department's 7 -year -
volunteer mounted patrol. Its creation carne as a relief to t e
mounted officers, who since 1941 volunteered their own horses and
services at many public event,: but had to pay for almost all the
expenses they incurred.
Outside the stables last week. Officer Edward Elliott, who was a
motorcycle officer until joining the unit 3 weeks ago. watched the
horses navigate an obstacle course under the scrutinizing eyes of a
veterinarian and a trainer.
Ile looked out toward the ring and spoke softly, almost o
himself.
"I'm trading my iron horse for a real one,' he said
riend in need—Boston mounted policeman
.ank Pomodoro comforts caz.after the horse
United Press International
stepped on a broken grating and fell into a hole.
A crane was used to lift the animal to safety.
ORANIGE COUNTY
R Monday, March 14, 1988/ Part 11 5
Bomb sniffer—Spuds and sheriff's investigator Leon
Bennigsdorf look for explosives in car of Daniel Bruce
Eumatsu, 37, of Costa Mesa, who was stopped for alleged
erratic driving Sunday morning near Culver Drive and Main
Street in Irvine. Police said they asked permission to search
KEN HIVELY / La Angeles limes
car and found a .44 -caliber magnum revolver and what
appeared to be a "homemade bomb." Thirty people were
evacuated from nearby apartments while device was
dismantled. Eumatsu was booked into Orange County Jail on
suspicion of carrying concealed weapon and facsimile bomb.
s -rt -g8
Santa Ana
Dog Pulls Man From
Truck in Gun Incident
Santa Ana police used tear gas and a
dog to force a man from his truck
Tuesday after he reportedly threatened
them with a revolver.
Brito Pandeleon, 50, a native of Mexico
with no known local address, was ar-
rested on suspicion of possessing a
concealed weapon and of brandishing it
at officers, police said.
Pandeleon was sitting in his truck in
the 2200 block of South Bristol Street
shortly diet. 2 a.m. on Tuesday, Santa
Ana Police Sgt. Dave Petko said. When
he saw police, Pandeleon reached to the
floor, locked his doors, rolled up his
windows and lay down, Petko said.
Officers asked him over a loudspeaker
to come out, Petko added. Instead, he
reportedly picked up the gun.
When police eventually fired tear gas
into the truck, Pandeleon "opened the -
door to air the truck out but he still _ ..
wouldn't come out," Petko said.
Police then released a dog, who
dragged Pandeleon from the truck,
Petko said.
■
Santa Ana
Suspect's Escape Plan
Really Falls Through
A chase that began when a robbery
suspect attempted to hide in the attic of a
hotel continued in the rafters above
guest rooms until the suspect fell
through a ceiling and into the arms of
waiting police officers.
Carl Young, 26. of Santa Ana. who had
been stopped by police for questioning
Wednesday in the strong-arm robbery
of a 74 -year-old man. fled into the
nearby English Motel, 2409 N. Main St.,
and in an attempt to elude officers,
climbed into the attic, Sgt. Collie Pro-
vence said Thursday.
When Young refused to come down.
officers unleashed a police dog, which
chased Young over four guest rooms
before he dropped through the ceiling,
Provence said.
Young was treated at. St. Joseph's
Hospital in Santa Ana for dog bite and
facial cuts and then booked into County
Jail on suspicion of strong-arm robbery
in a Saturday attack in which an elderly
man was shoved to the ground by a thief
who stole his wallet.
n With Glyn Shot, Wounded by Tustin Officer
liy ILL BILLITER, Times Staff Writer 0'd
A Tustin police officer shot and
wounded a 24 -year-old roan
Thursday night after the man al-
legedly threatened another officer
with a gun, authorities said.
Th identity of the shooting
victi and information on the ex-
tent f his injuries was being
withheld by police late Thursday,
pending further investigation, Tus-
tin Police Sgt. Mike Shanahan said.
Shanahan said the identity of offi-
cers involved in the shooting inci-
dent also would not be immediately
revealed.
'The shooting victim was taken to
Western Medical Center in Santa
Aha, where a spokeswoman late
Thursday night said she had been
asked by Tustin police not to
comment on the man's injuries or
his condition.
According to a press release
issued by Tustin police, the inci-
dent occurred about 7:45 p.m. in a
condominium complex in the 17500
block of Vandenberg Lane. Police
responded to the scene after re-
ceiving numerous emergency calls
about a "man with a gun, with at
least one shot fired," according to
the press release.
When police arrived, the state-
ment said a male suspect was seen
"on an upstairs balcony, still hold-
ing the gun." As officers attempted
to surround the scene, the man
pointed a gun at one of the officers,
according to the press release.
Another officer then fired a shot at
the gunman, and he "fell down but
would not surrender."
The gunman was finally brought
under control, with the ai4 ; of, a
police dog and his handler, the
' press release said.
Officers said late Thursday night
that they did not know the extent
of the man's injuries. One officer
said the shooting victim would
probably be arrested, but he said he
did not immediately know what the
charges would be.
The shooting victim is a Tustin
resident but did not live in the
Quail Meadows condominium com-
plex where the confrontation took
place, the officer said.
The shooting incident is being
investigated by both Tustin police
and representatives of the Orange
County district attorney's office,
which routinely investigates offi-
cer -involved shootings.
llos Angeles Climes,
ROOKIE: Officer Dies
in Struggle for Gun;
Suspect, 16, Is Killed
114
By MICHAEL CONNELLY, Times Staff Writer
LOS ANGELES—A rookie Los
Angeles police officer, on street
patrol less than three months, was
fatally shot Tuesday during a
struggle for his gun with a 16 -
year -old burglary suspect he con-
. fronted on a North Hollywood
street, police said.
The, lees4-age gunman, Robert
Jatee1ei Qf _North •Hollywood, was
ter.Q cl ed by police dogs to the
'httic of a nearby vacant house,
where he was shot to death by four
officers after he repeatedly at-
tempted to reach for the revolver
he had taken from the slain police
officer, Cmdr. William Booth said.
A 19 -year-old accomplice in the
burglary was captured, police said.
Officer James Beyea, 24. was
pronounced dead at 1:28 a.m. at St.
Joseph Medical Center in Burbank,
less than an hour after he was shot
in the head and leg, apparently
with his own gun, Booth said.
Beyea and Officer Ignacio Gon-
zalez, 44. an 18 -year veteran who
•
•
r
was Beyea's training officer, hail
answered a burglary alarm calla ;';l
Alpha Electronics at 7261 Lanker?r1
shim Blvd. at 12:20 a.m.
When the officers arrived, Booth'
said, they found a door to the''
business open and went inside to :'i
search.
The burglar alarm went off agairl'':'
and the officers saw one persdii
running from the rear of building:'•
They quickly returned to their •
patrol car and drove around the
block in an attempt to cut the .
suspect off, Booth said.
"Then they split up," the police
spokesman said. "Beyea went on • •
foot and Gonzalez stayed in the car'
They thought this would be the '
best way to go after the suspect." '
Beyea caught up with the sus=•i.`
pect on Hinds Avenue, just north of
Wyandotte Street—about two
blocks from the electronics-•
store—and attempted to arrest
him, Booth said. From the car,
Please see ROOKIE, Page 11
IHLAND
R Wedne<
Officer Dies in Fray for Gun
Continued from Page 10
Gonzalez saW his partner and the
suspect struggling for control of a
gun.
"Gonzalez was about a block
away when he - saw the struggbe,"
Booth said. "As he went toward
them, he heard and saw gunfire."
Beyea fell to the ground, Booth
said, and the suspect fired at Gon-
zalez as he approached. Gonzalez
returned the fire, but neither was
hit. The suspect then ran off while
Gonzalez went to Beyea's aid.
About 50 officers, aided by a
helicopter and seven police dogs;
searched a 16 -block area around
the shooting site, Booth said. About
4:30 a.m., one of the dogs led
officers to a vacant house at 11828
Runnymede St., about three blocks
northwest of where Beyea had
been shot.
Sgt. Gary Nanson, 34, and Officer
John Hall, 41, climbed to the attic
where they found Steele and told
him to raise his hands, police said.
The teen-ager complied but then
reached to his side to grab a gun,
Booth said.
Hall fired one time and wounded
Steele in the head, police said.
Despite several warnings to stay
still, Steele twice again attempted
to pick the gun up and was fatally
shot by Nanson and two other
officers.
The gun retrieved from Steele's
side was Beyea's service revolver,
Booth said.
PUBLI C
AUCTION
Free Drawing!
tout Vuitton NandWr
mg taw
from PROBATE, SEIZURES,
CONSIGNMENTS, ESTATES,
OUT OF PAWN
2 Part II /Tuesday, August 9. 1988 1
Orange Ca
Santa Ana
Suspects in Shooting
Captured After Chase
Reports of gunfire in a Santa Ana bar
touched off a police chase that ended
when one suspect surrendered and a
second was sniffed out by police dogs in
a yard -to -yard search.
Two people were discovered wound-
ed, one critically, by police who re -
i sponded to reports of a shooting at the El
Temescal tavern in the 900 block of East
4th Street shortly after 10 p.m. Sunday.
The chase began when police inter-
viewing witnesses outside the bar saw a
brown station wagon drive by that fit
the description of the car in which the'
gunmen had fled, according to Officer
Cliff Seward. The car was pulled over on
Borchard Avenue and the driver and a
passenger were ordered out of the auto.
he said.
"They appeared to start to comply,"
Seward said. "However, the driver put
the car in reverse and -attempted to run
over the officers:
One of the officers fired a single shot.
shattering the windshield but not strik-
ing anyone. Seward said. The driver
sped away and. as he attempted to turn
onto Baker Street, lost control and hit a
tree.
The passenger, identified as Jose
I iores Garcia of Santa Ana, was arrested.
but the driver. who was identifierd as
Benaba Cortez Rivera. 28, of Santa Ana.
fled on foot.
Two police doga and a police helicop-
ter searched for the driver, who was
found hiding in bushes in the back yard
of a house in the 1400 block of South
Magnolia Avenue. Rivera was treated
for dog bites to his right shoulder and
arm. A loaded handgun was found in the
car. Seward said.
The shooting victims, meanwhile. re-
mained hospitalized late Monday at
western Medical Center in Santa Ana.
Olegario Orozco Alcaraz. 22. of Santa
Ana, was listed in critical condition with
a gunshot wound in the chest. while
George Perez Serrato. 29. also of Santa
Ana. was in stable condition with a leg
wound. police said.
Two suspects were being held in the
Orange County Jail on suspicion of
,attempted homicide and assault with a
deadly weapon on an officer.
Stanton
-zq- 88
Man Shot; Bloodhound
Used to Find Suspect
A 46 -year-old Anaheim man was shot
once in the head early Sunday after a bar
argument, and the fleeing gunman was
arrested 30 minutes later by Orange
County sheriff's deputies using a blood-
hound. authorities said. _
Rex Slinkard Jr., 46, was listed in
guarded condition Sunday at the Los
Alamitos Medical Center with a gunshot
wound to the head. Sheriff's Department
Lt. Bob Nesmith said. A hospital spokes-
man declined to provide further infor-
mation on the wounded man's condition.
Charles Robert Shadowen, 33, of Gar-
den Grove was being held at Orange
County Jail on suspicion of attempted
murder in lieu of $250,000 bail. Nesmith
said.
According to Nesmith. Shadowen and
Slinkard had an argument inside the Sea
Horse Bar in the 8000 block of Orange-
wood Avenue at about 1:15 a.m. The pair
continued arguing outside in the parking
lot when, witnesses said. Shadowen
pulled a handgun and shot Slinkard.
Nesmith said.
Shadowen ran away, but a reserve
deputy sheriff arriving at the scene with
his bioodhound and went after him.
.111111010" -
Nesmith said.
The dog followed Shadowen's path to
a critical piece of evidence, Nesmith
said, declining to reveal what the animal
found. The evidence led sheriff's depu-
ties to Shadowen, the lieutenant said.
-�a-tee
Police Arrest
Two Suspects
in Crime Spree
Two men suspected in a series of
rapes and robberies in Las Palmas,
Cerritos. Cypress and Long Beach
were arrested Tuesday following a
brief car and foot chase by Los
Angeles County Sheriff's Depart-
ment deputies.
The men, identified as Terrance
Lavelle Joiner. 25, of Compton, and
Mario Cummings, 23, of Long
Beach, were in a car that ran a red
light in Long Beach, according to
Deputy Roger Hom. The ensuing
car chase ended in the 5700 block of
Cherry Avenue, where the sus-
pects hit a parked car and tried to
run away.
Joiner was arrested at the scene.
Cummings was found hiding in a
bush a few blocks away by police
dogs.
The men are suspected of being
two of the three men involved in a
crime spree that began at 10 p.m.
Sunday in La Palma. First. a
21 -year-old man and a 16 -year-old
woman were assaulted, and one of
the men threatened the couple with
a submachine gun. A short time
later. three men with a semiauto-
matic weapon robbed an 18-year-
oid couple and rapeci the woman.
The pair arrested Tuesday are
also suspected in similar robberies
and rapes in C re and Long
ch. Hom said. •
Cummings, who had been free on
parole. was held without bail. Bail
was set at $20.000 for Joiner. The
men were charged with robbery,
rape, resisting arrest, battery on a
peace officer, kidnaping and assault
•,vith a deadly weapon.
9-L9 $8
Costa Mesa
Man Arrested After
Incident Involving Wife
A Costa Mesa man was arrested early
Wednesday on suspicion of breaking
into his estranged wife's apartment and
assaulting her, police said.
Matthew James Stinson, 29, was ar-
rested after being found by a police dog
under a bush near the apartment during
a search led by Canine Officer Mike
Delgadillo, according to Police Lt. Alan
Kent. The search took place after Stin-
son allegedly entered his estranged
wife's apartment in the 1900 block of
Pomona Avenue about 1:30 a.m.. as-
saulted her and caused damage to the
apartment, then fled.
Stinson was arrested on suspicion of
burglary, malicious mischief and assault
and battery.
■
Residents Concerned
About Flow of Homeless
A group of Costa Mesa residents is
fighting to remove social service pro-
Hiker Found Dead
SEQOUTA NATIONAL
PARK—The body of a 20-year-old
UCLA student who had been miss-
ing here for more than a week was
found down a deep ravine Thurs-
day. He apparently was killed in a
fall on the first day of a solo hike,
officials said. Scores of rangers and
volunteers, aided by four helicop-
ters. searched fruitlessly for three
days after his father reported -
Wolfe Kirson missing late Sunday.
A dog team found Kirson's body
about 1 p.m. Thursday on the other
side of the summit of a "very steep,
very rocky" trail he was seen
heading up on Sept. 12, said Jan
Knox, a spokeswoman for the park.
Kirson and a friend had planned to
hike over 11,000 -foot Sawtooth
Pass and meet a group of friends on
the other side in Lost Canyon. But
Kirson's friend canceled at the last
moment.
1248-88
Youth Carrying Gun
Is Shot by Police
From Associated Press
A youth carrying an apparently
unloaded handgun was shot and
wounded Saturday by a police
officer after the young man alleg-
edly pointed his weapon at another
officer, police said.
Juan AreLlano, 18, was in satis-
factory condition with a neck
wound in the jail ward at County -
USC Medical Center, Deputy R.
McCreary said.
Arellano was booked for investi-
gation of assault with a deadly
weapon on a police officer, authori-
ties said.
He was shot after officers • and
,police dogs converged on a resi-
dence in South -Central Los Angel-
es where neighbors had reported
seeing a gunman. said Officer Gil-
bert Ortiz.
Westminster
Police Dog Helps
Find Robbery Suspect
Los Angeles sheriff's deputies used a
police dog to help find, a Westminster
man after he allegedly robbed a Hacien-
da Heights bank,. drove off in a car then
ran off and hid in thick brush, a sheriff's
spokesman said Wednesday.
Ronald Mendoza. 25, was arrested on
suspicion of robbing a Republic Federal
Savings Bank in Hacienda Heights about
10:55 a.m., the sheriff's spokesman said.
Deputies said Mendoza allegedly re-
ceived about $700 after he gave a note to
a cashier.
Witnesses gave deputies a description
of the getaway car and its license plate
number, which were broadcast on an
emergency channel. A sheriff's deputy
heard the broadcast and pursued the car
into Whittier, but the suspect ran off
into hilly terrain.
A police dog was requested and, after
several hours, found Mendoza hiding in
the brush. deputies said.
The suspect was taken to Queen of the
Valley Hospital and treated for dog bites
on his shoulder. He was later booked on
suspicion of robbery at Los Angeles
County- USC Medical Center.
•
MARK ROSTER / toe Angeles Times
Dutch Malinois named Wodon dislodges drug packet from auto's engine compartment and sends it flying during demonstration.
Hounding the Smugglers
7-11-88
BorderPatrolDogs'
to Sniff Out Crime
By RIIGO MARTIN, Tinea Stiff Writer
The U.S. Border Patrol hopes to
give smugglers of narcotics and
illegal aliens a tougher time cross-
ing the Mexican border into the
United States now that Wodon,
Barry. KeIIy, Rocky, Bart and
Brando are on the job.
The six dogs—Dutch and Bel-
gian Malinois that have been
trained to sniff out drugs and
people hidden in vehicles—are
part of a canine program launched
Tuesday by the Border Patrol in
the U.S. Immigration and Natu-
ralization Service's Western Re-
gion.
$ Skyrocketing Drug Seizures
It will be the first time that
trained dogs have been used to
check vehicles at or near the
U.S.-Mexico border in the West-
ern United States, said Dale Coz-
art, chief patrol agent of the
Border Patrol's San Diego Sector.
The dogs' time has come "be-
cause we are seeing skyrocketing
drug seizures, and illegal aliens
become more and more subjected
to life-threatening situations by
smugglers," said Harold Ezell,
INS western regional commis -
stoner
The dogs are unique, according '
to their trainer, David Beaver,
because they are trained to detect
narcotics hidden in secret com•
partments of vehicles, as well as
hidden people. Beaver, owner of
Adlerhorst International Inc. of
Riverside, which supplies dogs for
more than 85 law enforcement
agencies in the Southwestern
United States, said that unlike
most drug -sniffing dogs, these
dogs are trained not to bark or fl
scratch when they detect illegal
drugs or people in the car. Beaver
said that the dogs are 95% reliable
in finding drugs and hidden pas-
sengers.
The animals. valued at about
$6.000 each. are expected to save
the Border Patrol between 800 to
1,000 man-hours a year, heaver
said. Since the dogs simply signal
their trainers by sitting or stop-
ping when they detect illegal
drugs or hidden passengers,
Beaver said, they are expected to
cause much less damage to vehi-
cles being inspected than regular
drug -sniffing dogs.
Please see SCENT, Page 8
6 Part 11 / Wednesday. February 17. 1988 R
SCENT: Dogs
Will Hound
Smugglers
Continued from Page 3
Int front of 25 reporters and
photographers at the San Clemente
3order checkpoint. Beaver and
members of the Border Patrol
demonstrated the abilities of the
iogs by hiding a man in a concealed
compartment in the rear of a
station wagon. When Brando. a
black male Dutch Malinois. reached
the door nearest the compartment.
he stopped. signaling to his trainer
that:he had detected the scent of
something.
Dogs Perform
Border Patrol age!its also dem-
onstrated the dogs' ability to sniff
out drugs; they hid a bag of
marijuana in the grilt of the same
car. Wodon. a brown male Dutch
Malinois. circled the car and then
signaled his trainer by sitting in
'rant of the car that he had detect -
•,a the narcotics. Both dogs were
rewarded with a small toy.
Beaver said the dogs have been
trained to associate playtime with
:he smeils of drugs such as cocaine.
marijuana and heroin. "You can put
moth balls or ammonia or anything
on this grill. and the dogs will lust
::more it because they have no
association with it."
Border Patrol agents. who have
volunteered to work with the dogs.
will keep the animals at their
dogs. which-. rid to
commands given :n Dutch.
voric eignt-Hour shifts with their
trainers and will be rotated to
various checkpoints throughout
the area. Cozart said.
The dogs will be used at Borger
Patrol checkpoints from California
to Arizona. Cozart said.
ORANGE
MARK BOSTER / Los Angeles Times
Wodon, new canine member of Border Patrol, and soothing hand.
Two of the animals will be
assigned to the Yuma Border Patrol
Sector. where they will be used at
checkpoints along the Mexican
border between the Arizona -Cali-
fornia line and Tucson. A third dog
will be assigned to checkpoints
between Tucson and the New Mex -
co state line. and a fourth will be
•ised in the Border Patrol's El
Centro Sector. between the Arizo-
na state line and El Centro. The
remaining two dogs will be used to
check vehicles at the Border Patrol
checkpoints on the San Diego
Freeway south of San Clemente
and on Interstate 15 near Temecula
. Riverside County. Cuzart said.
INS spokesman Joe Flanders
said the service decided to launch
the canine program in the western
region following a successful five-
month trial project in Texas.where
everal dogs were used to check
enicles crossing the internationai
border.
The program comes in response
to rapidly escalating drug seizures
n the Southwest. Cozart said. The
value of illicit drugs seized in a
three-month period from October.
1987, through January. has in-
creased 168% over the same period
the previous year. INS officials
said. The dollar amount rose from
$46 million to $123 million for that
period, they said.
INS and Border Patrol, officials
could. not estimate the impact the
dogs mil have on narcotics smug-
gling across the U.S.-Mexican bor-
der. but Ezell said he expects the
canine program to "reduce it sub-
stantially.**
Border Patrol agents will contin-
ue their practice of stopping suspi-
cious vehicles traveling on free-
ways near the checkpoints and
directing the drivers to an area off
to the side. There the dogs and
their trainers will inspect the vehi-
cles. Ezell said.
By finding illegal aliens who are
being smuggled under dangerous
conditions. Ezell said. the do,gs also
•gill be saving peopie's lives.
"We want to avoid any situation
like that in Texas. in which 18
people died because they were
iocked in a railroad boxcar." Ezell
said. "If we can save one life. it will
be well worth it."
IMO
i
Buena Park
Oregon Man Arrested
on Narcotics Charges
A 32 -year-old Oregon man has been
arrested on suspicion of possessing 67
pounds of marijuana.and a small amount
of cocaine after officers were called to
his motel room for non-payment of his
bill. a police spokesman said Sunday.
Officer Rich McMillen said police
were called to the Best Western Motel at
8580 Stanton Ave. at 1 p.m. Saturday by
the manager, who told officers that the
suspect. Neil Marcell Pine of Coos Bay,
Ore., had refused to pay his past -due
rent.
The manager also told officers: that
the suspect might be involved in drugs
because there was "a lot of come -and -go
traffic" from the motel room. McMillen
said.
With Pine's permission. officers
searched the room and found a quarter -
ounce of cocaine. McMillen added.
He said the officers then requested
that thedepartment's.cs_g
doWith the dogs help, th officeers d
they found the 6Tpounds of marijuana in
the trunk of Pine's car:
The suspect was being held at the
Orange County Jail in lieu of $25.000
bail.
S3t/Nii� fil
a Pr w
Angela ants
ORANGE COCAINE: $60 Million in Drugs Seized
omit us= i isaa r astow
'art of the record 340 pounds of cocaine seized is displayed by polio► in Fullerton.
Fullerton Police Lead Raids
to Net $60 Million in Cocaine
By NANCY WRIDE.
Timen.saff Writer
F slletee police announced
Tuesday the tangle largest drug
metre m the cuy's history: 340
pounds df cocaine valued at
abase $ m1Wa
Officers also mimed s310.000 ha
cash and arrested 11 people—
several d them related to each
tter—on venous drug- traf-
fitting charges dunng raids
Monday at four Loa Angeles
County homes. detectives sand.
"These were me homes. in
nice rendenualareas." Fullerton
Police Capt. Donald Bankhead
aid. 'These were moor drug
'ratflckere not lower- levet out.
ate. They were moving the
:ruga. aeWng the drugs.
3esides the saustacuon of
-eking the arrests. aeteeuves
dia. the city naw stands to
-eceive a suable cnunk of the
:ash sowed because of federal
lurid state laws that allow law
°nfoRlment ageneses to recover
money and assets tnat can oe
: ed to drug sales.
Belem Drag Wes Cat
Fullerton narcotics officers
iandled the case because they
'ad develooea tnformauon aoout
-e suspects as a resuu of anotn-
.r tnvesugauon lis montns ago.
•'..ey said. Hamilton sari they
:onflsated nearly pure cocaine.
-store It has been cut tor atstn-
cuuon.
Bankhead said Fullerton de-
tecuves didn't to wnat one
:esa1b0es1'ees'—
.nul a week aero.
After several aays rat surveil -
ance at tae :our r.o nes—m
3elltlower. aoutn Gate. t'omona
,nes tang Beacn—waren war-
rants were ootainea. detective
Kevin Halwton said.
Segtmmne at 5:30 a.m. Mon -
:ay. Hamilton sato. aoout 30
:tracers amveo at the names at
.pout the same tame. serving the
warrants. Officers trom Brea.
Anaheim and Downey Douce ae-
;arunenta oaructoatea to note
'e arrests ana Inc preceding
' zveltlances. Hamilton salt
At the Bellflower nome. Douce
',tzea 48 kilos or cocaine.
1250.000 casn. a 3-muhmeter
autontaUc pooll. a
andseveralb-
Hamilton said five people
were arrested at that home on
summon ot poape no. of cocaine
Fullerton ooltce Cant. Donald Bankhead stacks some of the
5380.000 in cash seized in three Los Angeles County raids.
.:r sales and conaolracy to Ms-
c^oute cocauie Mieuel Beltran
Nunes J3. considered the "rum -
:eerier": Jose J. Martines. 22:
Jaime E. Nunez. 19: Teresa 0.
Nunes 24. and Letiaa M. Nunes.
19.
Mss!rofiieers eesrebed that
boors Ftee ton dog Nar-
ssslaia
a H®altrnf ojd
SCUM ffeasbOmd<•
Mass ase COca1 L Page 11
Cesdseed
�relieved
thekked bets and teen
temeSid MEL mid essence them
eight et the Nisi at liseekbe atdtes
Officers grew ammo qutckly at
the dbparny between the ince
nelgbbmhood and Miguel Nunes's
homer whose windows and doors
were protected by wrought -hon
Hamdtos rant There were also two
adult pit bullterriers m the back
yard. along with eight pups he
"It lent looked like they were
protecting more than they would
appear Meet to
have from the surface."
Ewing Vasquez.* was arrested
on strpmm of possum= et ea -
nuns tae cele and amtmal comer -
any m South Gate. where officers
said they weedabout$25A00ash.
plus several "firemen and hand -
In Pomona.. officers said they •
roundabout 100 kilo of income and
8100.000 ask, arrested there on 29. an stupmaon of poesatrcn et Jolt
Nunes. aa. 3T+ same charges
lwere Alesandnns marspa
for sale and conspiracy Twe ears were also sensed. 1
and Severe Nimes. 20. to dletetbate it. About 2 pounds d law police can keep such tmhiel
-Mmagma and SLOW cash were the Long Beach address. se atthe0mme sed. a entheawn if drug .npUni flet
police sold they arrested Pedro All of theneed ace convicted.ion aid "Won
we
Samna. 29. and Marta Contrera held wnbouc werebp al ara.�"
Fullerton Polios Capt. Donald BanklisGUM awns mown
ad holds seined cocain
4- Part tt /Thursday. June 30. 1988 R
ORANGE
$4.200.000
CASH SEIZED
Regional Narcotics
pression Program
6-27-88
GAIL FISHER / Las Amities limes
Costa Mesa Police Chief David L. Snowden behind coffin used to display $4.2 million seized in raid.
Capistrano Beach Questioning Leads to Raid
$4.2 Million Seized in Drug Investigation
9y DAVID REYES. Times Staff Writer
Cash totaling S4.2 million was
seized by law enforcement officials
'luring art invesugauon of a sus-
ected drug-trafficking ring that
vas first spotted in Orange County.
utnonties said Wednesday.
No arugs were found. but a
aded .38 -caliber handgun. ledg-
• rs. a money counter and cellular
tetephones were confiscated at an
apartment in Montebello in Los
ingetes Countv. said Orange
Jounty Sheriffs Capt. Tim Simon.
spokesman for the Regional Nar-
cotics Suppression Program.
Officers from the suppression
program. involving 19 Southern
California law enforcement agen-
cies...filia.began following a man in
a car who drove a circuitous route
through Orange County and into
Montebello. Simon said.
He then drove through Los An-
geles and returned to Orange
County before officers stopped him
at about 4:30 p.m. Monday in
Capistrano Beach near Interstate 5
and Camino de Estrella. Simon said.
After questioning the man. offi-
cers obtained a search warrant for
the Montebello apartment. where
•.he casn was found wrapped in
construction paper.
A police dog trained to sniff
nareaute gave an alert when it
sniffed the money. indicating to
officers that cocaine or other nar-
cotics had come in =fleet with the
cash. Simon said. •
"We received evidence that the
money was obtained (within! about
a week's time. and we pretty well
think the narcotic involved was
cocaine." Simon said.
Simon said the driver denied a
connecuon to the money. as did a
second suspect at the Montebello
residence. Both men. who are Mex-
ican citizens. were released pend-
ing further investigation. Officials
did not release the names of the
men.
The seizure came after three
weeks of tnvesugauon into a sus-
pected drug-trafficking and mon-
ey - laundering operauon. Simon
said.
Gr/
Feb. 28, 1989
Last night I had a call from a citizen concerned about recent GANG activity and
SKATE BOARD activity.:
Graffiti at Clark Field and Valley School
Lunch tables at Valley school have been broken up by skate boarders.
High school age skate boarders appear to be running in "gangs" and threatening
the younger children. The children are terrorized by these skate boarders.
I have personnally observed "big kids" on skateboard at Vons area weaving into
traffic, posing a threat to motorists and pedestrians, as well as themselves.
It is believed that some of these skate boarders are involved in drug activity.
We continue to get complaints from business people and pedestrians about the
skateboarders. Our police dept. seems to be powerless to do anything.
DO WE NEED AN ORDINANCE TO GIVE THE POLICE POWER TO STOP THIS ACTIVITY ?
WE DID AN ORD. TO STOP DRINKING ALCOHOL IN PARKING LOTS
CAN WE DO ONE TO STOP THE SKATEBOARDING IN PARKING LOTS ?
Von's market Manager as well as Burger King have told the citizen nothing can be
done about the skateboarders.
I am requesting this matter be put on the next Council Agenda
Wily is T* /' OPOR
penseN CA'L - i 4?P, 4 .
CvMPI-, /-S r!
P` c✓/ly
/ N t' \IPA/_ 00.410K/i✓ ' "-v " .
ioa
TO: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager DATE: March 9, 1989
SUBJECT: Memos re: skateboards FROM: Steve Wisniewski
Director of Public Sa ety
*******************************************************************************
*******************************************************************************
Attached is a response from Commander Mebius concerning recent inquiries about
skateboarding enforcement in parking lots.
I have directed that patrol officers begin to pay more attention to these types
of violations and take action. The new Sergeants' will be given direction in
this and other matters.
As for structures and surfaces that discourage skateboarding, I don't know of
many which would be compatable with other activity. Skateboarders love obstacles
and 'jumps'. Cobblestone or stamped concrete with a very uneven and rough sur-
face is about the only answer, short of concertina wire. However this type sur-
face might cause a lot of tripping and falling of pedestrians.
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
1Qa
Date: 03-02-89
To: Steve Wisniewski, Pub 'c Safety Director
From: John Mebius, Commande
Subj: Skateboard Activity
In response to recent concerns about skateboarding activity in
this community, I would like to bring you up to date on the
following issues:
(1) Skateboarding On School Property
We are in receipt of a letter signed by Mr. Don Ryckman,
Superintendent of Schools, dated April 21, 1988, that
requests our assistance in making sure skateboarding
activity does not take place on school property. Mr.
Ryckman cites the trespassing provision of the Education
Code as authority for arrest should that be required.
Officers are and have been made aware of the school
districts position on skateboarding and numerous contacts
have been made in the past with the youthful offenders by
our officers.
(2) Skateboarding On Vons Shopping Center
It is my understanding after consulting with Ms. Joan Noon,
General Services Director, that this particular parking
facility is and should be considered "Public Parking" due to
a mutual agreement the city and the developer entered into.
Therefore, our Municipal Code section 19-26(b) is applicable
and authorizes enforcement on the property. I will make
patrol officers fully aware of this. I will also advise the
Vons manager and Burger King manager of our intent to
enforce the applicable section.
(3) Skateboarding On Private Parking Lots Such As Alpha Beta &
Lucky Market Shopping Centers
There currently exists no specific ordinance that prohibits
skateboarding on these types of properties. I have also
checked with El Segundo, Manhattan, Redondo, Torrance and
Palos Verdes. These cities like us do not address this
issue. Penal Code section 602(1) addresses trespass,
however this section is only applicable if the skateboarder
refuses to leave once warned. I have contacted the City
Attorney, who indicated that he would research this issue
and make an appropriate recommendation.
Feb. 28, 1989
1 . /// T esr , , Y,:".
Last night I had a call from a citizen concerned about recent GANG activity and
SKATE BOARD activity.:
Graffiti at Clark Field and Valley School
Lunch tables at Valley school have been broken up by skate boarders.
High school age skate boarders appear to be running in "gangs" and threatening
the younger children. The children are terrorized by these skate boarders.
I have personnally observed "big kids" on skateboard at Vons area weaving into
traffic, posing a threat to motorists and pedestrians, as well as themselves.
It is believed that some of these skate boarders are involved in drug activity.
We continue to get complaints from business people and pedestrians about the
skateboarders. Our police dept. seems to be powerless to do anything.
DO WE NEED AN ORDINANCE TO GIVE THE POLICE POWER TO STOP THIS ACTIVITY ?
WE DID AN ORD. TO STOP DRINKING ALCOHOL IN PARKING LOTS
•
CAN WE DO ONE TO STOP THE SKATEBOARDING IN PARKING LOTS ?
Von's market Manager as well as Burger King have told the citizen nothing can be
done about the skateboarders.
I am requesting this matter be put on the next Council Agenda
Wilo/ c Thi 1 AOPs-A,
PEso•v c,4 -u- RE ePJA ..
C OMv1-4I1V -s f/ .dC71 ✓/ )7' ,7,7
/N '• viPw(/S 6'.44QJQlt/t 4-0 7- • .
Start 'of Item 68.
Message.
Subject: ski
Sender: Kevin NORTHCRAFT / CMGR/00
TO: Steve SKI / PD/00
Part 1.
TO: Tony ANTICH / PW/00
Steve SKI / PD/00
Part 2.
Dated: 02/08/89 at 1625.
Contents: 2.
Roger Bacon, via the Mayor, has filed a complaint re: skateboarders
on private property (his shopping center). Two thoughts: 1) Is there
any provision for us to enforce a ban on skateboarders on private
property such as we can enforce parking restrictions on private property
when properly signed? 2) Can we offer any suggestions on how to design
in structures or surfaces that will discourage skateboarding?
Any other ideas you have on how to resolve would be appreciated.
End of Item 68.
March 9, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Hermosa Beach City Council of March 14, 1989
ATTENDANCE REVIEW OF STANDING APPOINTIVE BODIES
This item was requested by Councilmember Sheldon.
Attached are the absence logs for the Council's two standing ad-
visory bodies for 1988. Also attached is the attendance policy
codified for the Planning Commission, which sets maximum absen-
ces, as follows:
For the calendar year -
No more than two (2) unexcused absences, and
No more than six (6) absences for any reason.
Due to business commitments, attendance has presented a difficul-
ty for new Planning Commissioner John Edwards. In recent discus-
sions with staff, Commissioner Edwards has committed to no more
than two additional, pre -noticed absences in 1989 (he has missed
one meeting in 1989 to date).
1
,t):1" -Z9
Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
KBN/ld
cc: Community Resources Director
Planning Director
lOb
EXCUSED ABSENCES
i
PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION
FEB. 24, 1988: REZNICHEK
APR. 20, 1988: REVICZKY
MAY 25, 1988: FISH
JUNE 22, 1988: REVICZKY
AUG. 24, 1988: FISH
JAN. 25, 1989: BYREN, FISH
Kevin,
I read in the action sheet of the last Council meeting of request
of list of Comissioners who have been absent from Commission
meetings. I don't know if that request included my group, but
the above covers the period from January, 1988 through February,
1989. All were excused absences.
Alana
1
PLANNING COMMISSION
Absence Record
/?e8"— / 911
DATE
NAME
REASON
(t /ct,...0 (
J l°•eAftc
�S ca .9452.1-
._Teie--
7;717 6.-Qel
GQI6 ADuc_
Gel R
k€'.
-� Fein
CitAL X t�
Ge °7
ESL
T L G04../ -.0L)
Scat jerk
e,Lv
1 d d
9/21' /c
�r-I
-
Atm447.1.4...3 4724 -
cru t- vz Liz
i
(S7) b' •
�.� • , G
Ci '• •
( 4,2
//'C -
/ ) ;•:'it
lit: J P :
,/1'17
c
2-73 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE 1 2-74
(h) Counsel with officials of public and private organiza-
tions and interested groups concerning community
recreation and leisure activities and assist them in the
promotion of park and recreational services; and shall
serve as liaison to the commission;
(i) Conduct studies of local conditions and needs for park
and recreation services, cultural arts programs, social
service programs, and assist with recruitment and
training of said personnel;
(j) Enforce all rules and regulations, resolutions and
ordinances of the city pertaining to public behavior in
all city -owned leisure oriented facilities and park
areas. (Ord. No. 81-663, § 10, 5-26-81)
ARTICLE VI. PLANNING COMMISSION•
Sec. 2-73. Created; composition.
. A planning commission is hereby created, which shall consist
of five (5) members. The members shall be qualified electors of
the city appointed by the city council. (Ord. No. 140 N. S., § 1;
Ord. No. 470 N. S., § 1, 7-17-73; Ord. No. 85-799, § 1, 6-13-85) .
Sec. 2-74. Terms of members; vacancies.
The term of office for appointive members shall be four (4)
years. Such terms shall be adjusted so that not more than two (2)
appointive terms shall expire on June 30th of the applicable
year. If a vacancy shall occur otherwise than by expiration of
term, it shall be filled by appointment by the city council for the
unexpired portion of the term.
No member of the commission appointed by the city council
shall remain on said commission for a period of time longer than
two (2) consecutive terms.
Three (3) absences from regular meetings of any commission
member within one (1) calendar year period creates an automatic
*Cross references—Attendance of city manager at commission meetings, §
2-17; planning commission as board of zoning adjustment, § 2-90 et seq.
State law reference—City planning commissions, Gov. C. A., §§ 65330-65342.
Supp. No. 6-85
46
C
c
12-76 ADMINISTRATION f 2-77
vacancy on said commission unless excused from such attendance
by consent of the commission; expressed by action made on the
record and recorded in the minutes. In no case should the total
number of absences exceed six (6) in any one (1) calendar year.
The secretary of the planning commission shall thereupon promptly
notify the city council and any such person so ceasing to be a
member of that fact, whereupon the vacancy so created shall be
filled by appointment under applicable provisions of this article.
Upon the expiration of a term, each member of the commission
shall serve until the successor is appointed and qualified, except
that in the event of a written resignation filed with the city
manager and accepted by action of the city council said resigna-
tion shall become effective on the date set forth therein. (Ord. No.
140 N. S., § 2; Ord. No. 394 N. S., § 1B, 10-20-70; Ord. No. 470 N.
S., §§ 2, 3, 7-17-73; Ord. No. 77-568, § I(e), 7-26-77; Ord. No.
82-692, § 1, 6-22-82; Ord. No. 85-799, § 2, 6-13-85)
Sec. 2-75. Powers and duties.
The city planning commission shall be governed in all respects
and perform the duties prescribed by applicable state and local
laws. (Ord. No. 140 N.S., § 3)
ARTICLE VII. POLICE RESERVE CORPS
Sec. 2-76. Established; appointment and compensation of
members.
There is hereby established in the city a police reserve corps,
the members of which shall be appointed by the city manager,
shall perform the duties and have the functions set forth in this
article and shall serve without compensation. (Ord. No. 90 N.S., §
1)
Sec. 2-77. Number of members; qualifications; powers and
duties generally.
The police reserve corps shall be limited to thirty-five (35)
members and shall be composed of individuals of either sex, who,
in the judgment of the city manager, are qualified physically,
psychologically and through a proper training program to assist
Supp. No. 6-85
46.1
INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE VOTERS
TM dry eroreey hes prepared the 1Mowde 1111 sed aatmay d the t01d purpas se/ pslete el 1111 proposed seamy
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SPECIFIC PLAN ORDINANCE
NO. 84-751, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN, REZONING THE PROPERTY COM-
MONLY KNOWN AS THE BILTMORE SITE. TO OPEN SPACE AND ALL OTHER PROPERTIES COVERED BY OR-
DINANCE NO. 84-751 REZONED TO C-2 (RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL ZONE), SUBJECT TO COASTAL COMMIS-
SION APPROVAL, AND REQUIRING A TWO-THIRDS VOTE OF THE PEOPLE FOR ANY AMENDMENT,
MODIFICATION OR. REPEAL OF THIS ORDINANCE.
This pepned laM atiee ordinance mould repeal Ike Speak PW Ara. slopled by Oe City toted' Is 1984..6115 spews ler s betel sit Meted uses sou IM meaty cnmaely loom u the Elleare Ppb. Padag tat
"C" ad edlseat PITON property. Ia plus el the Specifc Ise. Ids Nrdaeaes. M adopted by Ow atm, meld repine the Specific Pus dalqustles WM6 5se different mese.
The Memo GMs would be tensed to apse 3psa. The teed the E11mad d IM Gourd Plea wild We be cbaeped Ulm Caramerdalfgeasallesal tea Opo Specs dwgnudes *the Maim Ella. As Ops. Epees
property, IM Ms weld be regulated Iy M*c115.5 el 184 5eraose back belay Cads. TM wagged as allowed se the ate esuld bletede publls a /rivals pub, gaol bulldloW, reaatlaal ceders, pareemeld
belldlugs, 6btsrkal mssemeat er public eek sr plaza.
Tke roWalag meetly, Pad ldeg�"C" aid piste property wad f the puling sad wig of the Blethers 355, would be rained Is C-2 (Rahktsd Canelmisl Zees). TM Sward Plea for Ms as would apparengy
be change te Oeserst Comansslal. Pem1Ited ass seder lids zees are band to Eatlos 1.3 ef lin Mamas Bach Zoaleg Gds. Mb malap would be tit ams as PM adjacent dowotowa ares
la order le Implement IMF ordinance, the dty is directed to seek the Necasay approvals to Ihe cAsaga made how Ibe Calgerete Coastal Darn a. If any pit et this affiliation Is declared inrslld, IM remainder
ef lire ordinance dog be Implemested.
This erases shall Woe elect d adopted by a majority el the people. Aesordog te Ms Pmts, the ordinate cam oily be sanded. reputed sr modified by a twath kds Tele of aro people.
INITIATIVE ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SPECIFIC PLAN ORDINANCE NO. 84-751, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN.
REZONING THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE BILTMORE SITE TO OPEN SPACE SUBJECT TO COASTAL COMMISSION APPROVAL.
WHEREAS. the dtizens of Hermosa Beach find and dedere that the Sigmore Site is suitable for open apace purposes and open space is needed in the area because of existing congestion.
WHEREAS, the Biltmore Site is an.important natural resource of Hermosa Beach that should be enjoyed by residents and visitors.
WHEREAS. open space I an important necessary element of good planning for residents and visitors to Hermosa Beach.
WHEREAS. the citizens of Hermosa Beach find and declare that the Biltmore She has been undeveloped for the last 19 years, and that Open Space zoning would provide a continuation of the
existing openness In the area for residents and visitors.
WHEREAS, the citizens of Hermosa Beach desire to repeal the Specific Plan Area in order to rezone the Biltmore Site Open Space, along with the accompanying amendment to the General Plan
and maintain consistency between the General Plan and zoning.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 84751. as amended, is hereby repealed. The property that is a pail of the area commonly known as the Billnore Site Specific Plan Area. the legal description of which
is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A" shag be zones as set forth in this ordinance.
Section 2. The property commonly known as the Signiors Site, which consists of Lots 1 through 9 inclusive, Lots 19, 20 and 32 seg in Block 15 of Hermosa Beach Tract In the City of Hermosa Beach,
MceAngeles, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 1, Pages 25. 28 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county is rezoned to Open Space.
The Land Use Element of the Hermosa Beach General Plan is hereby amended to amend the designation from Commercial Recreational to Open Space for the properties described in
attached hereto.
Section 4. By this ordinance, the City of Hermosa Beach hereby amends the City Local Coastal Plan and Local Coastal Program to Open Space for the property known as the Biitmore Site, as described
above. and all other lends previously regulated by Speefie Plan Ordinance W. 84751 shall be changed to General Commercial.
Section 5. In the manner described by law. the City shall seek necessary approvals from the California Coastal Commission for the amendments made by this ordinance.
Section 8. The Land Use Element for all other properties formerly regulated by Specifc Plan Ordinance No. 84751, excluding the Biltmore Site, shag be amended to change the designation from
Commercial Recreational to General Commercial which is consistent with the underlying C-2 Zone.
Section 7. In the event that any provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unenforceable. the same shall not affect in any respect whatsoever the validity or enforceablity of the remainder
of this ordinance.
Section 8. This ordnance shall take effect in the manner provided by law.
Section 9. This ordinance shall only take effect if it receives a majority vote.
Section 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 11. There shag be no modification. amendment. or repeal of any provision herein except by a two-thirds affirmative vee of the electorate.
EXHIBIT "A"
DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY
• PARCEL 1:
Lots 19 through 29, inclusive. lots 32 and 33, seg in Mock 14 of Hermosa Beach, in the City of Hermosa Beach. County of Los Angeles, State of California. as per Map recorded in Book 1, Pages
25 and 28 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder d said county, together with:
(a) The north 15 feet of 131h Street Tying between the southerly prolongation of the east fine of Lot 29 and the southerly prolongation of the center fine of Beach Drive adjoining Lot 19 on the wit:
(b) The east one-half of Beach Drive adjoining Lot 19 on the west, lying between the westerly prolongation of the south line of said Ld 19 and the westerly prolongation of the center line of 14th
Court adjoining Lot 19 on the north;
(e) The south one-half of 14th Court, tying between the northerly prolngation of the west line of Lot 19 and the northerly prolongation of the east line of Lot 29.
PARCEL 2:
Les 1 through 9, inclusive, Lots 19, 20. and 32. seg in Bock 15 of Hermosa Beach, in the City of Hermosa Beach. County of Los Angeles. State of California. as per Map recorded in Book 1, Pages
25 and 28 of Maps. in the office of the County Recorder ol said county, together with:
(a) The north one -hag of 14th Street lying between the southerly prolongation of the west fine of Lot 1 and the southerly prolongation of the eat line of Lot 32;
(b) AN of Beach Drive adjoining said Lots 1 through 7, inclusive, and Lots 8 and 19, lying between the easterly prolongation of the south fine of said Lot 1 and the easterly prolongation of the north
line of said Lot 7;
(e) Alt 01 15th Court adjoining said lots 8. 9, 19. and 20 Tying between the southerly prolongation of the west line of said lot 8 and the southerly prolongation of the eat line of said lot 9; and
(d) The south one-half of 15th Court that would pass wi0ra conveyance of Lot 32 in Block 15 of Hermosa Beach, in the City ol Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per
Map recorded in Book 1, Pages 25 and 28 of Maps. in the office of the County Recorder of said county.
PARCEL 3:
Lots 1 through 10. inclusive. Lots 30 and 31, all in Bock 14 of Hermosa Beach. in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles. State of California, as per Map recorded in Book 1. Pages
25 and 28 of Maps. in the office of the County Recorder of said county, together with:
(a) The south one-half o1 14th Street adjoining said Lots 7.8.9 and 30. lying between the northerly prolongation of the west line of said Lot 7 and the southerly prolongation of the eat line of Lot
32 in Bock 15 of said Hermosa Beech:
(5) The north half of 14th Court adjoining said Lots 8.9.10.30 and 31, lying between the southerly prolongation of the east fine of said Lot 10 and the southerly prolongation of the west line of said Lot 8:
(c) The west one-half of Beach Drive adjoining said Lots 1 through 7, inclusive. lying between the easterly prolongation of the south line of said Lot 1 and the easterly prolongation of the north line
of said Lot 7: and
(d) The east one-half of Beach Drive adjoining said Lot 8, lying between the westerly prolongation of the north fined said Lot 8 and the westerly prolongation of the center lined 14th Court adjoining
saki tet.
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CIRCULATE PETITION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of the intention of the person whose name appears hereon of his intention to circulate an initiative petition within the City of Hermosa Beach, California. A statement of
the reasons of the proposed action as contemplated in the petition is as follows.
1. Instituting an ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach. California. repealing Specific Pian ordinance No. 84751, amending the land use clement of the General Plan. rezoning the property oommony
known as the Bittmoe Site to open space subject to Coastal Commission approval.
2. Whereas, the citizens of Hermosa Beach find and declare that the Biltmore Site is suitable for open space purposes and open space is needed in the area because of existing congestion.
3. There shag be no modification. amendment. or repeal of any provision herein except by a two-thirds affirmative vote of the electorate.
Parker Richard Herott
Dated: August 23. 1988