HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/25/89CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS
MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY
OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M.
CLOSED FRIDAYS
Where there is no vision the people perish...
HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are
participating in the process of representative government. Your
government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the
City Council meetings often.
It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new
items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by
the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have
all matters covered within the time allowed.
CITY VISION
A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile,
financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct
business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded
full municipal services in which : the maximum costs• are borne by.
visitor/users; ledby a City Council which accepts a stewardship
role for community resources and displays a willingness to
explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy
leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council
is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa
Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. •
Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986
NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers
THE'HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT
Hermosa Beach bas the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap-
pointed by and responsible to the City Council for.carrying out Council policy. The•
Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager, operating through
the entire city staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration
is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the
United States today.
GLOSSARY
The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen-
das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council.
Consent Items
•
A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re-
quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this
listing thereby causing that' matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal-
endar items Removed For Separate Discussion.
Public Hearings
Public Hearings are held on.certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford
the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the
matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior
to the Hearing.
Hearings
Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal
requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing.
Ordinances
An ordinance is a law that regulates government•revenues and/or public conduct. All
ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into
the records. At least one week laterCouncil• may adopt, reject or hold over the
ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the
second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive
the time requirements. .
Written Communications
The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally
communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed
with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting.
Miscellaneous Items and Reports ..City Manager
The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention
of, or for action by the City Council.
Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda,
usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday.
Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council
Members of the City Council may place items on •the agenda for consideration by the
full Council.
Other Matters - City Council ,
These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication
of. the Agenda.
Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature
Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con-
sidered on the agenda may do so at this time.
Parking Authority
The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte-
gral part of the City government.
Vehicle Parking District No. 1
The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur-
pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro-
mote public parking in the central business'district.
"Progress begins with the belief that
what is necessary is possible."
-Norman Cousins
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, April 25, 1989 - Council Chambers, City Hall
Closed Session - 6:30 p.m.
Regular Session - 7:30 p.m.
MAYOR
June Williams
MAYOR PRO TEM
Roger Creighton
COUNCILMEMBERS
Jim Rosenberger
Chuck Sheldon
Etta Simpson
CITY CLERK
Kathleen Midstokke
CITY TREASURER
Gary L. Brutsch
CITY MANAGER
Kevin B. Northcraft
CITY ATTORNEY
James P. Lough
All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND.
Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in
the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City
Clerk.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:
PROCLAMATIONS: Statewide Water Awareness Week, May 1-7, 1989
PRESENTATION: CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION FOR RETIRING CIVIL
SERVICE COMMISSIONER JOE MILLER
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the
Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Citizens may request to
speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal
Matters at the time the item is called. Citizen comments on
items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction
will be provided time at the end of the agenda. Please limit
comments to three minutes.
Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental
operations are requested to submit those comments to the City
Manager.
1.
CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be
acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con-
sent of the City Council. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by
a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed
1
1101.
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
will be considered under Agenda Item 3.)
Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting
the City Council held on April 11, 1989.
.Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants
Nos. through inclusive.
Recommendation to
Agenda Items.
receive and file Tentative Future
Recommendation to
financial reports:
1) Revenue and e
2) City Treasure
receive and file the March, 1989
xpenditure report;
is report.
•
of
Recommendation to adopt the following resolutions re.
the Hermosa Beach Street Lighting District No. 1989-1990
and setting June 13, 1989 for a public hearing:
1) Resolution approving the report of the Director of
Public Works made pursuant to the requirements of
Resolution 89-5240;
2) Resolution of intent to order certain street light-
ing fixtures and appurtenances to be installed and
maintained and electric current to be furnished for
street lighting fixtures throughout the City for
the fiscal year 89-90, and setting a public hearing
for June 13, 1989.
Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich
dated April 11, 1989.
Recommendation to adopt the following resolutions re.
the Hermosa Beach Crossing Guard Maintenance District
No. 1989-1990 and setting June 13, 1989 for a public
hearing:
1) Resolution approving the report of the Director of
Public Works made pursuant to the requirements of
Resolution 89-5241;
2) Resolution of intent to order certain Crossing
Guard services pursuant to Chapter 3.5, Articles
2,3, and 4, Sections 55530 thru 55570 of the
Government Code for the fiscal year 89-90, and set-
ting a public hearing for June 13, 1989.
Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich
dated April 11, 1989.
Recommendation to receive and file 3rd quarter status
report of Capital Improvement Projects. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated April 11,
1989.
Recommendation to approve annual request by Hermosa
Beach Chamber of Commerce for City services in conjunc-
tion with their 23rd bi-annual Fiesta de las Artes May
27, 28 and 29, and September 2, 3, and 4, 1989.
(i)
(1)
(m)
(n)
Recommendation to deny the following claim for damages
and refer to City's Claims Administrator:
1) Frank and Betty Fouce, 2930 Strand, Hermosa Beach,
filed April 11, 1989; alleged damages due to
failure of City to issue a building permit.
,Recommendation to receive and file final financial
statement, 1987-88. Memorandum from Finance Administra-
tor Viki Copeland dated April 17, 1989.
Recommendation to approve Professional Services Agree-
ment for the development of a Seismic Hazard Mitigation
Program. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director
William Grove dated April 17, 1989.
Recommendation to approve agreement between the City of
Hermosa Beach and School District regarding City main-
tenance of School District portion of Valley Park.
Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana
Mastrian-Handman dated April 17, 1989.
Recommendation to approve amendments and funding ap-
propriations for various State grants. Memorandum from
Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dat-
ed April 17, 1989.
Recommendation to accept resignation of Civil Service
Commissioner Joe Miller and direct City Clerk to adver-
tise for applicants. Memorandum from City Clerk Kath-
leen Midstokke dated April 20, 1989.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES.
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 89-980 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FROM M-1, OPEN SPACE AND R-2 TO
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA (SPA) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 603
FIRST STREET AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION
R NTAL EGATI DEC TIO . For adoption.
' / G� �
(b) ORDI CE O. 89- 81 - AN ORDINANCE AME4DING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FROM M-1
AND OPEN SPACE TO RESIDENTIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 4
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 540 FIRST STREET AND SHOWN
ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption.
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT ,CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE \PUBLIC.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M.
5. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS:
Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated
April 17, 1989.
A. GENERAL PLAN REDESIGNATION AND ZONE CHANGE FROM MEDIUM
DENSITY, R-2, TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL, C-3, OR TO SUCH
OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR
LOT 4, BLOCK 1, TRACT 6851 AND THE PRECISE PLAN FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT AT 1107 PACIFIC
COAST HIGHWAY AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION,
with resolution for adoption and ordinance for waiver of
full reading and introduction.
B. GENERAL PLAN REDESIGNATION FROM LOW DENSITY TO HIGH DEN-
SITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AREA 6,
WEST SIDE OF PROSPECT AVENUE, APPROX. 220 FT. SOUTH OF
ARTESIA BLVD., with resolution for adoption.
C. GENERAL PLAN REDESIGNATION FROM LOW DENSITY TO MEDIUM
DENSITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AREA
10, LOCATION GENERALLY FROM THE CITY LIMIT TO THE SOUTH
BETWEEN BARNEY COURT AND MEYER COURT, AND REAR OF LOTS
FRONTING ON SECOND STREET TO THE NORTH, with resolution
for adoption.
D. GENERAL PLAN REDESIGNATION FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO
LOW DENSITY AND HIGH DENSITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR AREA 12, NORTH SIDE OF 24TH PLACE, 90-
165 FT. WEST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, with resolution
for adoption.
E. TO REPEAL THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN
TO RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL, AND TO REZONE THE C-2 OR TO
SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE CITY COUN-
CIL FOR THE PRIVATELY OWNED PORTION OF BILTMORE SITE,
LOCATION GENERALLY BETWEEN 13TH STREET TO 14TH STREET ON
THE STRAND AND BETWEEN 14TH STREET TO 14TH COURT ALONG
BEACH DRIVE AND ADOPT THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLA-
RATION, with resolution for adoption and ordinance for
waiver of full reading and introduction.
F. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO CONSIDER THE LOCATION AND
POLICIES REGARDING MULTI -USE CORRIDOR AND TO CONSIDER A
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AND TO ADOPT THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEGA-
TIVE DECLARATION, with resolution for adoption.
(Recommend hearing on multi -use corridor to be opened
for requested testimony and then continued to May 3,
1989 to allow full public input.)
OTHER PUBLIC HEARINGS:
6. TEXT AMENDMENT RE. NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES AND
NEGATIVE DECLARATION, with ordinance for introduction.
Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated
April 3, 1989. (Continued from 4/11/89 meeting.)
7. EXTENSION OF THE MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING
PERMITS FOR NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES AND/OR USES. For
waiver of full reading and adoption. Memorandum from
Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 18, 1989.
4
8. CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUATION OF ALTERNATE SCHEDULING
FOR CITY HALL OPERATIONS. Memorandum from Personnel
Director Robert Blackwood dated April 17, 1989.
(Recommend hearing to be opened for requested testimony
and then continued to a later date.)
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
9. REVIEW OF POLICY ON RECLASSIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
TO RECLASSIFY FINANCE ADMINISTRATOR TO FINANCE DIRECTOR.
Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated
April 19, 1989.
10. REPORT ON BILTMORE SITE OPEN SPACE INITIATIVE. Memoran-
dum from City Attorney James P. Lough and City Manager
Kevin B. Northcraft dated April 19, 1989.
11. PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE IV, SECTION 17-55 ET
SEQ, OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
ALARM SYSTEMS. For waiver of full reading and introduc-
tion. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wis-
niewski dated April 17, 1989.
12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
(a) Oral report regarding recruitment and selection of
interim and permanent City Attorney.
14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items:
(a) Request by Councilmember Sheldon for discussion of ex-
panded anti -graffiti program. (Continued from 4/11/89
meeting.
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to
discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back
on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun-
cil action tonight.
15. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS
Citizens wishing to address the Council on items not on
the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction may do
so at this time.
ADJOURNMENT TO 5-3-89 AT 7:30 P.M. IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Michael Schubach, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Approach to Public Hearing for General Plan
Amendments
Recommendations:
The following outline is recommended for resolution of the
six General Plan Amendments before the Council:
1. Request staff report for each amendment
individually.
2. Open Public Hearing after staff report.
3. Allow public testimony for first amendment
only.
4. Take straw vote.
CONCUR:
5. Go on to next amendment, and follow same
steps as noted above. -1_":7
6. At Amendment Number 6, Multi -Use Corrider,
recommend continuance to May 3rd and no
staff report at this time
7. Allow public testimony for those who cannot
attend May 3rd meeting.
8. At the May 3rd Public Hearing request that
staff give report.
9. Reopen Public hearing and take public
testimony.
10. Have City Council discuss block by block,
(page by page of Planning Commission staff
report), proposed Multi -Use Corridor changes,
and take a vote on staff proposal, Planning
Commission proposal, and/or City Council
proposal.
11. Discuss policy statements, and vote.
12. Make final vote for each amendment with any
modifications as previously noted during the
straw vote.
evin B. Northcraft, City Manager
"Progress begins with the belief that
what is necessary is possible."
-Norman Cousins
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, April 25, 1989 - Council Chambers, City Hall
Closed Session - 6:30 p.m.
Regular Session - 7:30 p.m.
MAYOR
June Williams
MAYOR PRO TEM
Roger Creighton
COUNCILMEMBERS
Jim Rosenberger
Chuck Sheldon
Etta Simpson
CITY CLERK
Kathleen Midstokke
CITY TREASURER
Gary L. Brutsch
CITY MANAGER
Kevin B. Northcraft
CITY ATTORNEY
James P. Lough
All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND.
Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in
the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City.
Clerk.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:
PROCLAMATIONS: Statewide Water Awareness Week, May 1-7, 1989
PRESENTATION: CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION FOR RETIRING CIVIL
SERVICE COMMISSIONER JOE MILLER
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the
Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Citizens may request to
speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal
Matters at the time the item is called. Citizen comments on
items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction
will be provided time at the end of the agenda. Please limit
comments to three minutes.
Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental
operations are requested to submit those comments to the City
Manager.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be
.acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con-
sent of the City Council. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by
a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed
1
MED
will be considered under Agenda Item 3.)
(a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of
the City Council held on April 11, 1989.
(b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants
Nos. through inclusive.
(c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future
Agenda Items.
(d) Recommendation to receive and file the March, 1989
financial reports:
1) Revenue and expenditure report;
2) City Treasurer's report.
(e) Recommendation to adopt the following resolutions re.
the Hermosa Beach Street Lighting District No. 1989-1990
and setting June 13, 1989 for a public hearing:
1) Resolution approving the report of the Director of
N_5aS1 Public Works made pursuant to the requirements of
Resolution 89-5240;
2) Resolution of intent to order certain street light-
ing fixtures and appurtenances to be installed and
Vi -S2.51 street
and electric current to be furnished for
street lighting fixtures throughout the City for
the fiscal year 89-90, and setting a public hearing
for June 13, 1989.
Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich
dated April 11, 1989.
(f)
(g)
(h)
Recommendation to adopt the following resolutions re.
the Hermosa Beach Crossing Guard Maintenance District
No. 1989-1990 and setting June 13, 1989 for a public
hearing:
1) Resolution approving the report of the Director of
.sswi Public Works made pursuant to the requirements of
Resolution 89-5241;
2) Resolution of intent to order certain Crossing
Guard services pursuant to Chapter 3.5, Articles
triiA5a24 ® 2,3, and 4, Sections 55530 thru 55570 of the
Government Code for the fiscal year 89-90, and set-
ting a public hearing for June 13, 1989.
Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich
dated April 11, 1989.
Recommendation to receive and file 3rd quarter status
report of Capital Improvement. Projects. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated April 11,
1989.
Recommendation to approve annual request by Hermosa
Beach Chamber of Commerce for City services in conjunc-
tion with their 23rd bi-annual Fiesta de las Artes May
27, 28 and 29, and September 2, 3, and 4, 1989.
2
(i)
Recommendation to deny the following claim for damages
and refer to City's Claims Administrator:
1) Frank and Betty Fouce, 2930 Strand, Hermosa Beach,
filed April 11, 1989; alleged damages due to
failure of City to issue.a building permit.
(j) Recommendation to receive and file final financial
statement, 1987-88. Memorandum from Finance Administra-
tor Viki Copeland dated April 17, 1989.
(k) Recommendation to approve Professional Services Agree-
ment for the development of a Seismic Hazard Mitigation
Program. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director
William Grove dated April 17, 1989.
(1) Recommendation to approve agreement between the City of
Hermosa Beach and School District regarding City main-
tenance of School District portion of Valley Park.
Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana
Mastrian-Handman dated April 17, 1989.
(m) Recommendation to approve amendments and funding ap-
propriations for various State grants. Memorandum from
Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dat-
ed April 17, 1989.
(n) Recommendation to accept resignation of Civil Service
Commissioner Joe Miller and direct City Clerk to adver-
tise for applicants. Memorandum from City Clerk Kath-
leen Midstokke dated April 20, 1989.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES.
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 89-980 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FROM M-1, OPEN SPACE AND R-2 TO
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA (SPA) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 603
FIRST STREET AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption.
(b) ORDINANCE NO. 89-981 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FROM M-1
AND OPEN SPACE TO RESIDENTIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 4
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 540 FIRST STREET AND SHOWN
ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption.
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PIIBLIC.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M.
5. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS:
Memorandumfrom Planning Director Michael Schubach dated
April 17, 1989.
3
A. GENERAL PLAN REDESIGNATION AND ZONE CHANGE FROM MEDIUM
DENSITY, R-2, TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL, C-3, OR TO SUCH
OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR
LOT 4, BLOCK 1, TRACT 6851 AND THE PRECISE PLAN FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT AT 1107 PACIFIC
COAST HIGHWAY AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION,
with resolution for adoption and ordinance for waiver of
full reading and introduction.
B. GENERAL PLAN REDESIGNATION FROM LOW DENSITY TO HIGH DEN-
SITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AREA 6,
WEST SIDE OF PROSPECT AVENUE, APPROX. 220 FT. SOUTH OF
ARTESIA BLVD.,, with resolution for adoption.
C. GENERAL PLAN REDESIGNATION FROM LOW DENSITY TO MEDIUM
DENSITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AREA
10, LOCATION GENERALLY FROM THE CITY LIMIT TO THE SOUTH
BETWEEN BARNEY COURT AND MEYER COURT, AND REAR OF LOTS
FRONTING ON SECOND STREET TO THE NORTH, with resolution
for adoption.
D. GENERAL PLAN REDESIGNATION FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO
LOW DENSITY AND HIGH DENSITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR AREA 12, NORTH SIDE OF 24TH PLACE, 90-
165 FT. WEST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, with resolution
for adoption.
E. TO REPEAL THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN
TO RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL, AND TO REZONE THE C-2 OR TO
SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE CITY COUN-
CIL FOR THE PRIVATELY OWNED PORTION OF BILTMORE SITE,
LOCATION GENERALLY BETWEEN 13TH STREET TO 14TH STREET ON
THE STRAND AND BETWEEN 14TH STREET TO 14TH COURT ALONG
BEACH DRIVE AND ADOPT THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLA-
RATION, with resolution for adoption and ordinance for
waiver of full reading and introduction.
F. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO CONSIDER THE LOCATION AND
POLICIES REGARDING MULTI -USE CORRIDOR AND TO CONSIDER A
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AND TO ADOPT THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEGA-
TIVE DECLARATION, with resolution for adoption.
(Recommend hearing on multi -use corridor to be opened
for requested testimony and then continued to May 3,
1989 to allow full public input.)
OTHER PUBLIC HEARINGS:
6. TEXT AMENDMENT RE. NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES AND
NEGATIVE DECLARATION, with ordinance for introduction.
Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated
April 3, 1989. (Continued from 4/11/89 meeting.)
7. EXTENSION OF THE MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING
PERMITS FOR NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES AND/OR USES. For
waiver of full reading and adoption. Memorandum from
Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 18, 1989.
8. CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUATION OF ALTERNATE SCHEDULING
FOR CITY HALL OPERATIONS. Memorandum from Personnel
Director Robert Blackwood dated April 17, 1989.
(Recommend hearing to be opened for requested testimony
and then continued to a later date.)
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
9. REVIEW OF POLICY ON RECLASSIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
TO RECLASSIFY FINANCE ADMINISTRATOR TO FINANCE DIRECTOR.
Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated
April 19, 1989.
10. REPORT ON BILTMORE SITE OPEN SPACE INITIATIVE. Memoran-
dum from City Attorney James P. Lough and City Manager
Kevin B. Northcraft dated April 19, 1989.
11. PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE IV, SECTION 17-55 ET
SEQ, OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
qq ALARM SYSTEMS. For waiver of full reading and introduc-
tion. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wis-
niewski dated April 17, 1989.
12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
(a) Oral report regarding recruitment and selection of
interim and permanent City Attorney.
14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items:
(a) Request by Councilmember Sheldon for discussion of ex-
panded anti -graffiti program. (Continued from 4/11/89
meeting.
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to
discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back
on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun-
cil action tonight.
15. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS
Citizens wishing to address the Council on items not on
the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction may do
so at this time.
ADJOURNMENT TO 5-3-89 AT 7:30 P.M. IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
'MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, April 11, 1989 at the
hour of 7:37 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (a)
Wilhite v. Hermosa Beach, Gotanda v. Hermosa Beach, and Fouce v.
Hermosa Beach; threatened litigation under 54956.9 (b)(1); Real
Estate Negotiations regarding 8th Street lot; and Personnel.
Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor
Williams
Absent: None
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Present: Creighton,
Williams
Absent: None
- Betty Martin
Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor
PROCLAMATIONS Earthquake Preparedness Month, April, 1989
California Trails Days, April 22 - 23, 1989
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Gerry Compton - 832 -7th St - re Item 1(k) Business Tax
Wilma Burt - 1152 -7th St - re Item 1(g) Red Zone and 1(j) reclas-
sification of Finance Administrator.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations
(a) through (1) with the exception of the following
items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in
order for clarity: (e) Simpson; (j) Rosenberger; and (1)
Sheldon.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.
(a)
(b)
Recommendation to approve minutes as follows:
1) Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on
March 22, 1989.
2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on March 28,
1989.
Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants
Nos. 29593 through 29596 inclusive, and 29598 through
29714 inclusive noting voided warrants 29601 through
29605 inclusive and 29649, 29650.
Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future
Agenda Items.
Recommendation to receive and file the March, 1989 in-
vestment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L.
Brutsch dated April 5, 1989.
1
Minutes 4-11-89 la
(e.)
(f
(g)
(h)
Recommendation to award agreement for park irrigation
system assessment and rehabilitation program in an
amount not to exceed $35,310, CIP 87-508. Memorandum
from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated March
29, 1989.
Action: To authorize the Mayor to sign an Agreement
with Aqua Engineering, Inc., for Park Irrigation System
Assessment, CIP 87-508, in an amount not to exceed
$35,310. and authorize staff to issue addenda as neces-
sary within budget limitations.
Motion Sheldon, second Williams.
AYES: Rosenberger, Sheldon, Mayor Williams
NOES: Creighton, Simpson
Recommendation to award bid for Cushman parts to Pacific
Equipment and Irrigation. Memorandum from General Ser-
vices Director Joan Noon dated April 3, 1989.
Action: To accept the bid from Toro Pacific Equipment
and Irrigation, for cushman parts, in the amount of
$13,306.38 including tax, plus freight.
Recommendation to adopt resolution establishing a red
zone on Aviation Boulevard in the vicinity of Owosso and
Ocean Drive for the provision of improving sight distan-
ces at the Ocean Drive crosswalk. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated April 3,
1989.
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5250, entitled "A
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. N.S. 2435, AS AMENDED
BY ADDING THERETO A NO STOPPING RESTRICTION ON AVIATION
BOULEVARD AS HEREIN DESCRIBED SET FORTH." (at Owosso and
Ocean)
Recommendation to adopt resolution establishing a 25
mile per hour speed limit on Monterey Boulevard. Memo-
randum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated
April 4, 1989.
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5251, entitled "A
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SPEED
SURVEY ON MONTEREY BOULEVARD". (Maintaining speed limit
at 25 MPH.)
Recommendation to receive and file election calendar for
November, 1989 General Municipal Election. Memorandum
from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated April 6, 1989.
Recommendation to approve class specification for posi-
tion of Finance Director; salary range for that posi-
tion; and reclassification of Finance Administrator.
Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat-
ed April 3, 1989. Supplemental memorandum from City
Treasurer dated April 11, 1989.
2
Minutes 4-11-89
(k)
(1)
Proposed Action: To approve staff recommendation.
Motion Sheldon - dies for lack of second.
Action: That the reclassification policy be brought
back for review at next appropriate meeting.
Motion Creighton, second Williams.
AYES - Creighton, Simpson, Mayor Williams
NOES - Rosenberger, Sheldon
Proposed Further Action: To abolish the position of
Finance Administrator and proceed to employ a Finance
Director per Civil Service.
Motion Williams - dies for lack of second.
Proposed Further Action: To proceed to reclassify
Finance Administrator to Finance Director.
Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger.
AYES - Rosenberger, Sheldon
NOES - Creighton, Simpson, Mayor Williams
Final Action: To continue consideration of this posi-
tion until policy comes back.
Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered.
Recommendation to adopt resolution establishing a policy
to implement Ordinance No. 88-941 regarding increases in
business license taxes that are imposed on a flat fee
basis. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director
William Grove dated March 30, 1989.
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5252, entitled "A
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A POLICY PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE
NO. 88-941 PERTAINING TO THE ANNUAL PERCENTAGE INCREASES
ON BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES IN CHAPTER 17 OF THE HERMOSA
BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE."
Recommendation to accept and file information report on
the resolution of the Quanta v. City of Hermosa Beach
litigtion and approve staff recommendation on designa-
tion of funds. Memorandum: from City Manager .Kevin B.
Northcraft dated April 5, 1989.
Action: To accept and file the information report on
the resolution of the Quanta v. City of Hermosa Beach
litigation, and approve staff recommendation to disig-
nate the $125,000 funds received as settlement as fol-
lows: $60,000 to the General Fund, and $65,000 to the
affordable housing designation in the General Fund Unap-
propriated Reserve.
Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered,' noting
the objection of Creighton.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES.
3
Minutes 4-11-89
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 89-978 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 4
OF ORDINANCE NO. 88-917 PERTAINING TO THE TIME LIMIT TO
OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT. For adoption.
Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-978.
Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered.
(b) ORDINANCE NO. 89-979 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 4-
6.1(1) OF HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO REQUIRE THE
POSSESSION OF A SUITABLE MEANS OF REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL
OF A DOG OR ANIMAL NUISANCE (DEFECATION). For adoption.
Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-979.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
At this time items e, j, & 1 were discussed but are
listed in order for clarity.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO GRANT A CON-
DITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
#20644 FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 1722 GOLDEN AVENUE.
(Continued from 3/28/89 meeting.) Memorandum from Plan-
ning Director Michael Schubach dated April 4, 1989.
Supplemental letter from Lowell Stirratt dated April 6,
1989.
A staff report was presented by Director Schubach.
The City Clerk announced the appellant had called and
withdrew the appeal this morning; however, no written -
statement has been received.
The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward.to speak
was:
Jerry Compton - GWC - 200 Pier Avenue
The Public Hearing was closed.
Proposed Action: To drop the appeal as appellant had
requested.
Motion Williams, second Sheldon.
City Attorney Lough asked to speak before the vote and
advised the Council to go ahead with the decision to
avoid future problems.
The motion was withdrawn.
4
Minutes 4-11-89
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5253, entitled " A
RESOLUTION CONCURRING WITH THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VEST-
ING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #20644 FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM
PROJECT AT 1722 GOLDEN AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT
26, ANGELA HEIGHTS TRACT."
Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered.
A recess was called at 8:32 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:45
P.M.
6. ZONE CHANGE FROM R-2, M-1 AND OPEN SPACE TO EITHER R-1,
R-2, SPA OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY
THE CITY COUNCIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION
AT 603 FIRST STREET, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION.
Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated
April 3, 1989. Supplemental letter from ISCO Industries
received April 11, 1989. Supplemental memorandum from
Planning Director dated April 11 re: comparison chart of
densities under various zones.
A staff report was presented by Director Schubach.
The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak
were:
Patrick Killen - 312 S. Catalina - architect
Bob Erickson - 614 -1st P1 - oppossed
Herb Schneider - 157 Ardomore - oppossed
Caroline Colby - 719 -1st P1 - oppossed
Paulie Schneider - 157 Ardmore - oppossed
John McHugh - 718 -1st P1 - oppossed
Ms. Gantner - adjacent - supports
Jan McHugh - 718 -1st P1 - oppossed
Susan Jensen - 3108 Poinsettia M.B. - rep. sellers
Geoff Rue - 641 -25th St - supports
Gerry Compton - 200 Pier Ave - supports
The Public Hearing was closed.
Action: To approve a Specific Plan Area with 11 units,
2400 square feet per unit, 18 dwelling units per acre,
the reduction in units be applied to open space.
Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting
the objection of Williams.
Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 89-980,
entitled "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANG-
ING THE ZONE FROM M-1, OPEN SPACE AND R-2 TO SPECIFIC
PLAN AREA .(SPA) FOR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW AND
SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRON-
MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." (603 First Street) amend-
ing as follows:
5
Minutes 4-11-89
Page 1 line 23 add a new WHEREAS as H, changing H to I
to read as follows:
"H. The Specific Plan Area adopted by this ordinance
shall allow for a maximum number of 11 dwelling units.
The number of dwelling units and lot coverage set for
this Specific Plan Area are based upon the impact the
plan area would have, considering the total lot area,
and its impact upon the traffic and the surrounding
neighborhood comprised of smaller lots. Allowing a
higher number of units on a large parcel would adversely
impact the surrounding neighborhood with a dispropor-
tionate number of vehicle trips and external impacts;
I. Rezoning the subject parcel to a Specific Plan Area
for 11 dwelling units will result in consistency between
the zoning and the General Plan;"
Page 2 line 14 change to read: "The Permitted Use shall
consist of a maximum of 11 dwelling units."
Page 2 line 21 you would add a new Section (c) and (c)
would become (d) and the new (c) would read as follows:
"(c) The lot coverage required for the Specific Plan
Area shall not exceed 32.6%.
(d) All other standard including but not limited to
open space, placement of building, setbacks other than
noted above, and building height shall be governed by
the zoning ordinance, Article 5, R-2 Two -Family Residen-
tial Zone, and Article 7.2, Condominiums, Stock Coopera-
tive and Community Apartments.
(e) Any residential use shall be subject to an approval
of a Conditional Use Permit."
Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon.
AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor
Williams
NOES - None
Final Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 89- 980.
Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting
the objection of Williams.
7. ZONE CHANGE FROM M-1 AND OPEN SPACE TO EITHER SPA, R-2
OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE CITY
COUNCIL AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DEC-
LARATION AT.540 FIRST STREET, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRO-
DUCTION. (Continued from 3/28/89 meeting.) Memorandum
from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 20,
1989.
A staff report was presented by Director.Schubach.
6
Minutes 4-11-89
The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak
were:
Pat Killen - 312 S. Catalina - architect
Herb Schneider - 157 Ardmore - oppossed
Carolyn Colby - 719- 1st P1 - oppossed
Polly Schneider - 157 Ardmore - oppossed
John McHugh - 718 -1st P1 - oppossed
Jan McHugh - 718 -1st P1 - oppossed
Shirley Gantner — supports
Bob Erickson - 614 -1st P1 - oppossed
The Public Hearing was closed.
Action: To approve a Specific Plan Area with 10 units,
2400 square feet per unit, 18 dwelling units per acre,
the reduction per unit would equal 3 1/2 % applied to
open space. (If the math does not work out, it's the
number of units that control.)
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton.
AYES - Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson
NOES - Creighton, Williams
Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 89-981,
entitled "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANG-
ING THE ZONE FROM M-1, OPEN SPACE AND R-2 TO SPECIFIC
PLAN AREA (SPA) FOR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW AND
SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRON-
MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION.", amending as follows:
Page 1, line 13 - The addition of an additional finding:
"D. The Specific Plan Area adopted by this ordinance
shall alllow for a maximum number of 10 dwelling units.
The number of dwelling units and lot coverage set with
this Specific Plan Area is based upon the impact that
maximum development of the plan area would have, con-
sidering the total lot area, and its impact upon the
traffic and the surrounding neighborhood comprised of
smaller lots. Allowing a higher number of units on a
large parcel would adversely impact the surrounding
neighborhood with a disproportionate number of vehicle
trips and external impacts."
Page 2, line 1 - shall read:
"The Specific Plan Area shall allow for a maximum of 10
dwelling units." •
Page 2, line 6 - shall read:
"A maximum of 10 dwelling units shall be permitted."
Page 2, line 8 - add an additional d to read:
"(d) The lot coverage required for the Specific Plan
Area shall not exceed 32% of the overall area."
Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton.
AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor
Williams
NOES - None
7
Minutes 4-11-89
Final Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 89-981.
Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon. So ordered, noting
the objections of Creighton and Williams.
The City Manager stated that he would agendize the
development standards in the R-2 zone.
8. PROGRESS REPORT AND MORATORIUM EXTENSION FOR VIDEO SALES
IN C-1 AND C-2 ZONES, WITH INTERIM ORDINANCE FOR ADOP-
TION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated April 4, 1989.
A staff report was presented by Director Schubach.
The Public Hearing was opened. No one coming forward to
speak, the Public Hearing was closed.
Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 89-982,
entitled "AN ORDINANCE TO EXTEND TEN (10) MONTHS AND
FIFTEEN (15) DAYS ORDINANCE NO. 89-976 ESTABLISHING A
MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS AND CON-
DITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESSES
THAT SELL/AND OR RENT VIDEO TAPES IN THE C-1 AND C-2
ZONES."
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton.
AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams
NOES - Rosenberger
Pursuant to Government Code Section 36934, since waiver
of reading was not adopted by unanimous vote of the
council, the ordinance was read in full by Councilmember
Rosenberger.
Final Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-982.
Motion Williams, second Creighton. So ordered, noting
the objection of Rosenberger.
9. TEXT AMENDMENT RE. NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES AND
NEGATIVE DECLARATION, WITH 'ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION.
Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated
April 3, 1989. Supplemental memorandum from City Man-
ager Kevin B. Northcraft dated April 11, 1989 with al-
ternate draft ordinance.
A staff report was presented by Director Schubach.
The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak
were:
Peter Stabler - 66 -18th Street
Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive
Lael Stabler - 66 -18th Street
Robert Edmonds - 830 -14th Street
Sharon Blanks - 830 -14th Street
Gerry Compton - 200 Pier Avenue
Bill Drewer - 1037-39 Sunset
8
Minutes 4-11-89
Action: To continue the Public Hearing open until the
next meeting on April 25.
Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered.
HEARINGS
10. POLICY STATEMENT CONFIRMATION RE. REMODELLING AND EXPAN-
SION OF NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES AND/OR USES AND AP-
PLICABILITY TO 45 - 14TH STREET REMODELLING. Memorandum
from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 4,
1989.
A staff report was presented by Director Schubach.
The Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were:
David Schumaker - 1612 The Strand - applicant
Rick Coleman - 67 -14th Street - architect
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5254, entitled "A
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A POLICY STATEMENT INTERPRETING SEC-
TION 1302 REGARDING DEMOLITION OF NONCONFORMING USES AND
NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES." (therefore denying the pro-
posed development)
Motion Simpson, second Creighton.
AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Rosenberger
NOES - Mayor Williams
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
11. SELECTION OF A REAL ESTATE BROKER FOR THE SALE OF CITY -
OWNED SURPLUS RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. Memorandum from
Building and Safety Director Williams Grove dated April
3, 1989.
Director Grove stated for therecord that a late pro-
posal was received by Jan McHugh, Sandpiper Realty, on
April 11, 1989; however, the deadline was March 15.
Action: To select the firm of Anderson -Ryan Realty Co.
to act as broker in the marketing and sale of three sur-
plus residential properties loctated at 705 1st Street,
704 1st Place, and 634 1st Street via a public auction.
The auction should be limited to principals only with a
2% commission to the broker.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.
12. RESOLUTION AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN AND ORDERING VACA-
TION OF 21ST STREET. Memorandum from Public Works Di-
rector Anthony Antich dated April .4, 1989.
Addressing the Council on this item were:
Jerry Compton - 200 Pier Avenue - architect
Otto Palmer - 632 Monterey Blvd. - applicant
9
Minutes 4-11-89
Action: To approve staff recommendations as follows:
1. Approve the Development Restriction Agreement
between Applicant and the City of Hermosa Beach reflect-
ing development conditions to be placed on Lots 6, 7,
and 8 of Tract 1868, limiting Lots 6 and 7 to 3400
square feet, and Lot 8 to 3900 square feet, exclusive of
garages.
Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered.
2. Require that the Development Restriction Agreement
be recorded as a deed restriction against the affected
properties prior to recording the Resolution Ordering
Vacation; and no bootleg or additional units shall be
permitted on said lots.
Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered.
3. To adopt Resolution No. 89-5255 entitled " A RESOLU-
TION AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN AND ORDERING THE VACATION
OF A PORTION OF TWENTY-FIRST STREET IN SAID CITY."
Motion Williams, second Simpson. So ordered.
13. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AND EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT ALLOW-
ING PARTICIPATION IN THE INDEPENDENT CITIES LEASE
FINANCING AUTHORITY; APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTOR AND ALTER-
NATE DIRECTOR. Memorandum from Finance Administrator
Viki Copeland dated April 5, 1989.
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5256, entitled "A
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF -A
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE INDEPENDENT CITIES
LEASE FINANCE AUTHORITY, APPROVING THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE
CITY IN SUCH AUTHORITY, APPOINTING THE CITY'S REPRESEN-
TATIVE AND ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE TO THE AUTHORITY'S
BOARD OF DIRECTORS, AND RELATED MATTERS."; authorize the
Mayor to execute the agreement; and appoint Councilmem-
ber Jim Rosenberger Director and Viki Copeland as Alter-
nate Director to the governing body of the Authority.
Motion Sheldon, second. Creighton. ,So ordered,
14. DEMONSTRATION OF NEW NOISE EQUIPMENT. Oral report from
Public Safety Department.
This item was continued..
15. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
City Attorney James P. Lough announced that he has
turned in his resignation effective May 15 to accept a
position in Northern California as County Counsel.
Action: To take action on this item tonight, as the
need arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda.
Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered.
- 10 -
Minutes 4-11-89
Final Action: The City Attorney, as rapidly as pos-
sible, make the move with the Tort Claims acts against
the City with the adjuster as he stated, (Coleman &
Wright) and authorize the City Manager to sign a sub-
stitutions of attorney. Authorize the City Manager at
his discretion to make a recommendation regarding an
interim City Attorney should that become necessary after
the City Attorney leaves. Authorize our Personnel Di-
rector to advertise and assemble resumes, and proposals,
recruitment criteria to come back in 2 weeks.
Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered.
16. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
17. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items:
(a)
Request by Councilmember Sheldon for discussion of ex-
panded anti -graffiti program.
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to
discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back
on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun-
cil action tonight.
This item was continued.
18. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS
Jim Lissner - 2750 El Oeste - re: Lowering speed limit
on Gould Avenue.
ADJOURNMENT
The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California adjourned on Wednesday, April 12, at the hour
of 12:53 A.M.
City Clerk
MinlitPQ n_„ _nn
EP
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 16.45:07
PAY VENDOR N.'.ME
DESCRIPTiON
H HERMOSA
SAL/3-16
11 HERMOSA
SAL/,4-1
H HERMOSA
SAL/3-16
(( HERMOSA
SAL/3-16
H HERMOSA
SAL/3-16
li HERMOSA
SAL/3-16
H HERMOSA
SAL/3-16
H HERMOSA
SAL/3-16
H HERMOSA
SAL/3-16
BEACH PAYROLL ACc:OUNT
TO 3-31-89
BEACH PAYR(1LL. ACt:OUNT
10 4-15-89
BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT
TO 3-31-89
1JEACH PAYROLL ACI:(UNT
TO 3-31--d9
BEACH PAYROLL ACc;OUNT
TO 3-31-89
BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT
10 3-31-89
BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT
TO 3-31-89
BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT
TO 3-31-89
REACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT
TO 3-31-89
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00243 001-202-0000-2030
04/04/09
00243 001-202--0000-2030
04/19/89
00243 105-202-0000-2030
04/04/89
00243 110-202-0000-2030
04/04/89
00243 145-202-0000-2030
04/04/09
00243 155-202-0000-2030
04/04/09
00243 160-202-0000-2030
04/04/09
00243 170-202-0000-2030
04/04/89
00243 705-202-0000-2030
04/04/89
00273
00274
$197,365.00
/ACCRUED PAYROLL.
$246,310.60
/ACCRUED PAYROLL
00151 $6,391.50
/ACCRUED PAYROLL
00152
00147
00140
00146
00002
00109
$40,782 16
/ACCRUED PAYROLL
$1,804.66
/ACCRUED PAYROLL
$3,884 61
/ACCRUED PAYROLL
$6,577.30
/ACCRUED PAYROLL
$5,527.91
/ACCRUED PAYROLL
$9,771 23
/ACCRUED PAYROLL
*** VENDOR TOTAL *+ * *+r****M **#*W*####**+r,r##+t*#**** *.** +1####**#*###**###*aril** *
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
PERS ADVANCE/MAR 89
H PUB EM'( JYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/MARCH 09
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/MARCH £39
PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/MARCH 89
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/MARCH 89
00026 001-400-1213-4180 00289
04/10/89
RETIREMENT
00026 001-400-1213-4180 00290
04/20/89 RETIREMENT
00026 001-400-1213-4180 00291
04/20/89
RETIREMENT
00026 001-400-1213-4180 00292
04/20/89 RETIREMENT
00026 105-400-2601-4180 00096
04/20/89
STREET LIGHTING
$518,414 97
$74,954.96
/RETIREMENT
$83,285 72
/RETIREMENT
$74, 954. 96CR
/RETIREMENT
$73.62
/RETIREMENT
$733. 78
/RETIREMENT
PAGE
DATE 04/2o
INV/REF PO # CHI
AMOUNT UNENC DATE Ek
295,,
$0 00 04/19
29/1
$0 00 04/1.)
295v
$0 00 04/19
295'.
$0.00 04/19
295v
$0 00 04/19
295
$0 00 04/19
29 5'
$0 00 04/19.
295'7
$0.00 04/19
2959
$0.00 04/19
2971.
$0.00 04/19,
2971
$0.00 04/20:
2971.
$0.00 04/20/
2971,
$0.00 04/20/
29717
$0.00 04/20/1
fh
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 16:45:07
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
tl
PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RE1 I kc., :-mT/MARCH 89
H PUB EMPLOYEES RE11.« "-MT SYS.
RETIREMENT/MARCH 89
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/MARCH 89
H Pl/,. -MPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RET IREMENI ..'49CH 89
H PUB EMPLOYEES REIIREME:,•. 'YS.
RETIREMENT/MARCH 1:19
H PUB EMP+ .cta RETIREMENT SYS.
RF' .,thMENT/MARCH 89
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/MARCH 89
H PUB EMPLOYEES RE T I I1EMFt\I'
RETIREMENT/MARCH ".
I� P EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
REF[REMENT/MAUCH 89
CITY or HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR'04/25/89
VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT
PATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00026 110-400-33W ^480 0009/
04/20/89 VEH PKI L.:'11
00026 110-400-3302-4180 0009
04/20/89 PARKING ENF
00026 145-400-3401-4180 00071
04/20/89 DIAL A RIDE
01)026 145-400-3402-416., 000/1
04/20/89 ESEA
00026 145-400-3403-4180 00021
04/20/89
,BUS PASS SUBSUY
00026 155-400-2102-4180 ("
04/20/89 CRIB0'.,,+I GUARD
00026 ''.,--400-3102-4180 00096
On "� r19 SEWER/ST DRAIII
00026 705-400-1209-4180 00021
04/20/89 LIABILITY INS
00026 705--400-1217-41c"; 00020
04/20/F19 WORKERS COMP
+Fn* VENDOR TOTAL****u'*.********************.'.
$150. /8
/RETIREMENT
$4,-Y17.00
/RETIREMENT
$140.54
/RETIREMENT
$54.65
/RETIREMENT
`F a -
/RF T IRF^"'" . ,
$125.d0
/REIIREMENT
$829..19
/RETIREMENT
$115
/RI ' 74EMENT
$164.42
/RETIREMENT
* ** PAY CODE TOTAL **+"' ..,rr+************************************4*************a +***4 ..
• 3M WINDOW TINTING
TINT SOUTH WINDOWS/CITY
02579 001-400-8604-4309 00126
1896 04/13/R<j CIP 86-604
PAGE ,'102
DATE 04/2(,,S9
INV/REF PO M CHk #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE E.P
*90.501.48
$608,916.45
$933.24
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
r+r* VENDOR TOTAL..****'****ni+*******x"::**********+t*****************************u.,*****4t
P, A- + CUAST REFITALS
MISC CHGS/APR 89
$0.00 04/2 ,09
297
$0.00 04/2 ""89
29;''
6C ' 0 04/2 • 139
29,
$0. 00 04/;"189
29: !/
$0.00 04::. ;.134
29, 1 7
$0.00 04/2: 1 ,
2971'
$0.00 04/L' 1/89
2971/
$0. 00 04/21/89
29, '
$0.00 U4/2 V89
189/: 07258
$933.24
00029 001--400-8614-4201. 0002.' $138.42 ';7165•
71658 04/15/89 CiP 88-614 /CONTRACT SE!'V10E/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL_ a**+, aN*#,r******##*#######*###**",,'•,tu*4##########**##########t+ff**#*aa
R A-1 OFFICE E0l1TPNENT
SHREDDER WASTEBAGS
02190 001-400-2101-4305
944-0 04/13/89 POLICE
'•1:38.42
00971 $55.:18
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
00041
$0.00
297-11
04/7 1/89
29,''
04.. ''89
91944— 07982 29. '3
$55. 38 04/.' •'89
•
•
•
•
40
FII ..NCE—SFA340
TIN•.E 16:45:07
Nt i VENDOR Nr'.i1E
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
1 DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND M ACCUUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ 4 ACCOUNT I%LSCRIPTION
**,. VENDOR TOTAL a************N.r#****w*****.a*****####+r .** +r ***#*#**.*****####+r#
it VIJAY K *AGAHbtAI
CITE PMT REFUND 92173
02781
04/05/89
110-300-0000-3302 26826
PAGE
DATE 04/20
INV/REF PO
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXt
*55 38
$18.00
/COURT FINES/PARKING
AR,• VENDOR TOTAL *****t.********,t******;e*****************.it***************************
it
APOLLO !LASING COMPANY LTD
LEASE PM1/MAY 89
$18.00
02558 001-400-3104-6900 000U! $841.29
04/15/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /LEASE PAYMENTS
**. VENDOR TOTAL**************************q*****************************************
• ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL
RAG RENTAL/MAR 89
It ARATEX/RED STAR INDUS I R IAL.
RAG RENTAL/MAR 89
it ARATEX/RCD STAR INDUSTRIAL.
RAG RENTAL/MAR 89 •
• ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL
RAG RENTAL/MAR 89
rt ARATEX/kED STAR INDUSTRIAL
RAO RENTAL/MAR 89
00152 001-400-2201-4309 00671
03/31/89 FIRE
00152
03/31/89
00152
03/31/89
00152
03/31/89
00152
03/31/89
001-400-3104-4309 00222
TRAFFIC SAFETY
001-400-4204-4309 01297
BLDG MAINT
001-400-4205-4309 00358
EQUIP SERVICE
110-400-3302-4309 00532
PARKING ENF
$041.29
$37.76
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$10.00
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$129.38
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$28.50
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$8.63
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*#„ VENDOR TOTAL**************************.I***************************************** $214.2.
• ARCOM
RADIO CLIPS/BATT ELLM
02621 001-400-2101-4307 00165
3483 02/15/89 POLICE
$170.40
/RADIO MAINTENANCE
**I VENDOR TOTAL*************************t..:***************************************** $170.40
rt
AV—UX/PKUFIRE
MISC CHCS/APR 89
79217) 0/887
$0 00 04/20
00066
291.'
$0.00 04/20.
00017 297.'
$0.00 04/20.
00017 297.'
$0 00 04/20.
0001/ 297
$0.00 04/20,
00017 2972.
$0.00 04/20
00017 29 72 (
$0 00 04/20.
3483 08526 2972
$0 00 04/19•
00603 705-400-1217-4182 00094 $69.63 986551 00046 297..
86551 04/15/89 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR $0.00 04/20,
**: VENDOR TOTAL.**************************lI*****************************************
R AVIATION LOCK Yx KEY
MISC CHCS/MAR 89
$69.63
00407 001-400-3101-4309 00018 $7.24
03/31/89 MEDIANS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
00035 2972':
$0.00 04/20/
FINANCE•-SFA340
TIME 16:45:07
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R AVIATION LOCK & KEY
MISC CHCS/MAR 89
AVIATION LUCK & KEY
MISC CHGS/MAH 89
R AVIATION LOi:K & KEY
MISC CHCS/MAR 89
H AVIATION LOCK & KEY
MISC CHGS/MAR 89
R AVIATION LOCK & KEY
MISC CHCS/MAR 89
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE 1NVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00407 001-400-3103-4311 00460 $1.07
03/31/09 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
00407 001-400-4204-4309 01296
03/31!89 BLDG MAINT
00407 001-400-4205-4311 00127
03/31/89 EQUIP SERVICE
00407 110-400-3302-4305 00556
03/31/89 PARKING ENF
00407 110-400-3302-4309 00531
03/31/89 PARKING ENF
**u VENDOR TOTAL***ui**********************t*****
R B & D ENGINE AND MOWER
REPAIR EDGER/CHAINSAW 35541
PAGE u,
DATE 04/20.
INV/REF PO # CHS,
AMOUNT UNLNC DATE EX
$196.51
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$2. 13
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
$d.14
/UFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$45. 74
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
******************************#*u**
01887 001-100-6101-4309 00677
04/12/89 1 PARKS
$254.03
$80.43
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
**u VENDOR TOTAL***H**********************W************************************if****
R BANC ONE LEASING 99
LEASE PMT/MAY 89
$80.43
02154 001-400-4205-6900 00032 $417.96
04/15/89 EQUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS
*441- VENDOR TOTAL***x**********************4*****Baa***************************fl4**,(**
R BANK OF AMERICA
MAR EXP/K. NORTHCRAFT
R BANK OF AMERICA
MAR EXP/K. NORTHCRAFT
R BANK OF AMERICA
MARCH EXP/S WISNIEWSKI
00180
03/31/89
00180
03/31/89
001-400-1101-4317 00313
CITY COUNCIL
001-400-1201-4317 00177
CITY MANAGER
00180 001-400-2101-4316 00359
03/31/89 POLICE
$417.96
$60.82
/CONFERENCE EXPENSE
$22.47
/CONFERENCE EXPENSE
$55.52
/TRAINING
*** VENDOR TOTAL_***i<**********************.,*****************************************
R BAUER COATING & CHEMICALS
VALVE/PAINT SPRAYER 39389
$138. 81
00251 001-400-3104-4309 00223 $86.68
04/05/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
00035 29/,:
$0.00 04/20
00035
297.
$0.00 04/20
00035 2972'
$0.00 04/20
00035 297.'
$0.00 04/20
00035 297d
$0.00 04/20
735541 08170 2973
$0.00 04/20.
00054 297:31
$0.00 04/20.
06685 2973.
$0.00 04/20.
06685 297.3.
$0.00 04/20'
08514 2973.
$0.00 04/20/
39389 08160 2973_:
$0.00 04/20/
J
4
J
J
J
16
•
•
•
I
•
1
I
•
1 MANCE--SFA 140
iME 16:45:07
AY VENOUR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND 41 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT'
DATE (NVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
* VENDOR IOTA( ***,. w***********fr*************** *********1* *************************
Ft BR1GETIE*BEIOLR
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND /4651
PAGE
DATE 04/20
INV: REF PO k t'Hh
AMOUNI UNENC DATE Ex,
$86.68
0278/ 001-210-0000-2110 02795 $100.00 74651 08414 297.E
04/17/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/19
.k VENDOR TOTAL**n,4************n*********A*****************************************
R JIH*BL1CKENSDERFER
THEATRE TECH/APR 4/9
R JIM*BLICKENSDERFER
THEATRE TECH/MAR—APR 89
01303
04/11/89
01303
04/03/89
001-400--4601-4201 00310
$100 00
$119.00
COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
001-400-4601-4201 00311
$504.00
COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
* VENDOR IOTAI. ***,:**********R;i***********a**********************************a*****
R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
CIT1' HEALTH INS/MAY 89
El BLUE_ SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R BLI!E SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
CIT." HEALTH 1NS/MAY 89
R
BUIE SI(IELD OF CALIFORNIA
CITY HEALTH 1NS/MAY 89
R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY B9
R BLUL SHIELD OF CAL1FORNIH
CITY HEALTH 1NS/MAY 89
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
CITY HEALTH 1NS/MAY 89
R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
01308
04/17/89
01300
04/17/89
$623.00
001-400-1212-4188 01361 $72.15
EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
105-400-2601-4188 00720 $0.51
STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
01308 110-400-3301-4188 00697 $2.05
04/17/89 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
01308 110-400-3302-4188 00917 $2.05
04/17/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
01300 145-400-3401-4188 00659 $0.26
04/17/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
0130u 145-400-3402-4188 00659
04/17/89 ESEA
$0.51
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
01308 145-400-3403-4188 00120 $1.01
04/17/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
01300
04/17/89
155-400-2102-4188 00339
$0.51
CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
01308 160-400-3102-4188 00664 80.65
04/17/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
0/751 297A
*0.00 04/19
07746 29/3
*0 00 04/20
00055 297J
$0.00 04/19
O(,055 297.;
$0.00 04/19
00055 2973
$0.00 04/19.
00055 297.x.
$0.00 04/19
00055 2973:
*0.00 04/19,
00055 297A
$0.00 04/19.
00055 2973,
$0.00 04/19
00055 297.i
*0.00 04/19
00055 2973c
$0.00 04/19:
F I I IANCE--SFA340
TIIIE 16:45:07
Pt)/ VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE 1NVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPFION
**. VEN1i(R TOTAL***,<H***********4.a********µ*****,t***********************************
It BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
• BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
It BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
• BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH 1NS/MAY 89
it BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
A BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
01293 001-400-1212-4188 01369
04/15/89 EMP BENEFITS
01293 110-400-3302-4188 00922
04/15/89 PARKING ENF
01293 145-400-3401-4188 00663
04/15/89 DIAL A RIDE
01293 145-400-3402-4188 00663
04/15/89 ESEA
01293 705-400-1209-4188 00093
04/15'89 LIABILITY INS
01293 705-400-1217-4188 00092
04/15/89 WORKERS COMP
VENDOR TOTAL***,**A*************************
R BRAUN LINEN SERVICE
MISC CHCS/MAR 89
00163 001-400-2101-4306 00638
03/31/89 POLICE
PAGE
DATE 04/20
INV/REF PO # CHIA
AMOUNT IINENC DATE Ex,
$79.70
$10. 043. 81
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$689.38
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$11.08
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$6.83
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$85.41
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$170.82
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$11,013 33
$155.36
/PRISONER MAINTENANCE
**a, VENDOR TOTAL.*****************:r**************-*********************************
• BROOKES ELECTRIC
EMERG REP/COUN CHAMBERS 8219
▪ BROOKES ELECTRIC
ST LITE REPAIRS
00355 001-400-4204-4309 01299
02/28,89 BLDG MAINT
0035 105-400-8203-4201 00033
8119 01/29/89 CIP 85-203
$155.36
$275.57
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
00056 297J
$0.00 04/20
00056 2973
$0 00 04/20
00056 29/J i
$0.00 04/20
00056 2973
$0.00 04/20
00056 297"3
$0 00 04/20:
00056 2973.
$0 00 04/20
00038 2973/.
$0.00 04/20,
8219 08140 2973`
$0 00 04/20.
$47.93 8119 08126 2973'
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/20:
**: VENDOR TOTAL ***,****************************,r*********************************** $323.50
tt GAIL*BROWN
MEALS/COMPUTER CLASS
01004 001-400-2101-4316
04/10/89 POLICE
00358 $14.50
/TRAINING
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $14.50
R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES
DUMP CHGS/MAR 89 37002
08517 2974(
$0.00 04/20/
00158 001-400-3103-4201 00216 $5.048.90 90300-037002 00004 29741
03/31/89 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/20/
F 1. I.\NCE- SFA340
TIME 16.45:07
VENDOR NAME
DESC:R IP 1 I ON
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DLSCRIPTION
** VENDOR TOTAL *#i.,*****a.****i.,,p************** ******************** **************
t1 BSI CONSULTANTS, INC
PLAN CHECK FEES
F2 BSI CONSULTANTS, INC.
PLAN CHECK FEES
It BSI CONSULTANTS, INC.
I'LAN CHECK FEES
R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC.
PLAN CHECK FEES
Ft BSI CONSULTANTS, INC
PLAN CHECK FEES
00630 001-400--4201-4201 00145
1103 03/03/89 BUILDING
'.19856
60493
1039
60493
00630 001-400-4201-4201 00146
11/25/88 BUILDING
00630 001-400-4201-4201 00147
01/05/89 BUILDING
00630) 001-400-4201-4201 00148
02/05/89 BUILDING
00630 001-400-4201-4201 00149
02/05/89 BUILDING
PAGE
DATE 04/20
INV/REF PO 4 13*
AMOUNT UNENC DATE E.
$5.048 90
$3.084.91
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$2.410.40
1103 07508 2974.
$795 00 04/20
59856 04999 2974.
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $2.410.40 04/20
$4,232.54 60493 04995
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
29/4
$0.00 04/20.
$2.825.42 1039 07501
2974.
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *1.977 00 04/20
83. 771. 05 1039/60493 04998
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $4.336.00
**. VENDOR TOTAL **********#********************,ru**##**#*#*#####**#**#*#**#*##*****
it
BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY
COMPUTER RIBBONS/TAPES 93/94
• BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY
DISPATCH PRINTER SUPP. 46568
• BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY
OFFICE SUPP/PD DISPATCH 46610
$16,324.32
00034 001-400-1206-4305 00371 $802.59 148689/93/94 07830
02/17/89 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $802.58
00034 001-,400-2101-4305 00972
12/22/88 POLICE
00034 001-400-2101-4305 00973
12/22/88 POLICE
$477.00
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
$631.29
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
**i. VENDOR TOTAL***k****************************************************************
Il
CA LANDSCAPL MAINTLNANCE. INC.
PARKS MAINT/MAR 89 70903
• CA LANDSCAPL MALNTEiNANCE, INC
PARKS MAINT/MAR 89 /6903
00599 001--400-3101-4201
03/31'09
MEDIANS
00599 001-400-6101-4201
03/31/8Y PARKS
$1.910. 88
2974.
04/20
29/4
04/20.
146568 08521 2974.
$0.00 04/19
146610 08522 29/4
$0.00 04/20,
00012 $3.000.00 0470903 00061
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
29/4-
$0.00 04/20.
00139 $8.710.00 0076903 00061
2974
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/20.
** VENDOR TCITAI-***n******w,r****aa********ft*****:ru**********,r****************A******
R CAL POLY KELLOGG UNIT FOUND.
TUIT/S. WISNIEWSKI
00677 001-400-2101-4313
04/13/89 POLICE
$11.710.00
00200 $351.90
08529 2974;
/TRAVEL EXPENSE. STC $0.00 04/20/
1- 1. IANCE. SFA340
T NIE 16 45:07
1' .Y VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND ,i ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN tF AMOUNT
DATI: INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DE;;CIlIPT10N
*a, VENIIUR TOTAL**4x*********************7******..,i*****************************,t*****
P CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
INSTALL WATER/GENTRY 1853
PAGE
DATE 04/mac,
INV/REF PO $
AMOUNT UNL.NC DAIS Lt
$351.90
00671 125-•400-8502--4201 C)0069 81, 716. 00
02/09!89 CIP 85-502 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
H CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00671 180-400-2202-4201 00007 $5.095.63
INSTALL/REPLACE FIRE HYD 03/2,;/89 HYDRANT UPGRADE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
u,A VENDOR TUTAI**u.,+r*;r************************�***********************************
It
CANADA LIFE
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
$6,811.63
00041 001-400-1212-4188 01362 $707.00
04/17/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Au VENDOR TOTAL ***.. *** R****************** w****;< ************************•If***********
• CANADA LIFE
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
• CANADA L.IFL
CITY HE#IL TH INS/MAY 89
Ii CANADA LIFE
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
rt CANADA LIFE
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R CANADA LIFE
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
CANADA LIFE
CITY HEALTH INS/NAY 89
I� CANADA LIFE
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
1 CANADA LIFE
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R CANADA LIFE
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
00239 001-400-1212-4188 01359
04/17/89 EMP BENEFITS
00239 105--400-2601-4188 00718
04/17/89 STREET LIGHTING
0023', 110-400-3301-4188 00695
04/17'89 VEH PKG DIST
00239 110-400-3302-4188 00915
04/17/89 PARKING ENF
00239 145-400-3401-4188 00657
04/17'89 DIAL A RIDE
00239 145-400-3402-4188 00657
04/1789 ESEA
00239 145-400-3403-4188 00118
04/1789
BUS PASS SUBSDY
00239 155-400-2102-4188 00337
04/17/89 CROSSING GUARD
00239 160-400-3102-4188 00662
04/17 '89
SEWER/ST DRAIN
$707.00
82. 607. 94
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$76.74
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$17.37
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$573.94
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$5.16
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$1.76
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$1.95
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$14.45
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$94.78
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
185:3 06463
297.1
$0.00 04/20
05370 2974
$5.053.00 04/20
00008 29/4
$0.00 04/19.
00024 2974.
$0.00 04/19.
00024 29/1.
$0.00 04/19
00024 29/4:
$0.00 04/19
00024 29 741
$0 0U 04/19,
00024 29741
$0.00 04/19/
00024 297.V.
$0.00 04/19.
00024 29741,
$0 00 04/19/
00024 29/41.
$0.00 04/19
00024 2974b
$0.00 04/19/
v
•I
F 11 t,;NCE -SFA340
T ItiE 16:45:07
VENDOR N, AE
DESCR'PI tON
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE U.
FOR 04/25/89 DATE 04/20
VND tI ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO N CH'.
DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EAt
It CANADA LIFE 00239 705-400-1209-4188 00089 $17.77 00024 2974
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89 04/17/89 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 04/l9
It CANADA 11FE 00239 705--400-1217-4188 00088 $6.31 00024 294
CITY HEAITH INS/MAY 89 04/17/89 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 04/19
**. VENDOR TOTAL tr*#**********a**n**###***#***##*w##*#*#*******#####***###**###****#*
$3,418.17
CAHHULI f1ASONAR. CON5IHU(.I ION F 02777 001-210-0000-2110 02807 $175.00 67080 0/194 29/4
WORK GUAk REFUND 6/080 04/03/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/20
**, VENDOR TOTAL*********************#**#***#*#************************************* $175.00
It J. 1. *ce, 3E CREDIT CORP. 01141 160-400-3102-6900 00083 *748.32 00021 29/'
LEASE PMI/MAY 89 04/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 04/20
**a VENDOR TOTAL*****.**********f:********:r****,a***********************************
CAVENAUcH AND ASSOCIATES 02790 001-400-2101-4312 00920
TUITION/L. RICKEY
04/13/89 POLICE
$748.32
$75.00 08533 2975
/TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 04/19
**,. VENDOR TOTAL**#***a*******#***#######****#*.h*#*#***********#*#*#**######*##*###
*75. 00
it CELLULAK DYNAMICS COMPANY 02449 001-400-2101-4304 00364 $262 38 00310 2975
MOBILE POONES/MAR 89 03/31/89 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0 00 04/20,
**„ VENDOR TOTAL **##************ii,F****************** *#**********####****A**********
$262.38
it CENTRAL BANK LEASING 01226 001-400-2101-6900 00414 $1,978.59 00024 2975
LEASE PMI/MAY 89 04/15/89 POLICE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 04/20,
**i. VENDOR TOTAL..****************_au************************************************** $1,978.59
II CENVAL 1EASING 58 00876; 001-400-2101-6900 00416 $594.51 00020 2975,
LEASE PMI/MAY 89 04/15/89 POLICE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 04/20,
**w VENDOR TOTAL#*#*##**#*######*#*#*#***#*##**#*###**#*****************************
$594.51
It CHAFFEE MOTORS 02748 001-400-2101-4311 00646 $369.00 20529 07974 2975;
REPAIR PATROL CAR FENDER 20529 03/27/89 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $369.00 04/20/
40
tINANCE-SFA340
TIME 16:45:07
PAY VENDOR Ni iL
DESCR IP T i IN
CITY OF HERMOSA IIEACI4
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DCSCRIPTION
** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************************************
**
R CINTAS MPORA1ION
UNIFORM 1i NT/MAF 89
R
CINTAS t IRPORAT I ON
UNIFORM l NT/MAR 89
VENDOR TOTAI
PAGE t:
DATE 04/20
INV/REF PU # CHh
AMOUNT UNENC DATE LX,
$369.00
00153 001-400-4202-4187 00113 $607.18
03/31/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
00153 110-'400-3302-4187 00174 $52.50
03/31/89 PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
:,**#*ilii********k*******#itIF*#*#a****###*####***##***##*#*****a,t*****
R M. J. *C1 , LAND
WORK GUARANTEE REFUND /0607
** VENDOR TOTAL
02790 001-210-0000-2110
04/17/89
$659.68
00002
29/5
$0.00 04/20
00002 2975-
*0 00 04/20
02792 $350.00 70607 08410 2975
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/1''
****#*****************##il.t***********************************.M***#
R COM SYSI. EIS, INC
LONG DIS1 MAR 89
R COM SYSI 11S, INC
LONG DIS1 FED 89
R COM SYSI
LONG DIS1
R COM SYS1
LONG DIST
MS, INC
MAR 89
MS, INC
FEB 89
R COM SYS1 MS, INC
LONG DIST MAR 89
R COM SYS1: MS, INC
LONG DISI EEB • 89
R COM SYS1 IMS, INC
LONG DIS1 MAR 89
R COM SYSI. MS, INC
LONG DIST/FEB 89
00017
03/31/89
0001/
02/28/89
00017
03/31/89
00017
02/28/89
001,-400-1121-4304 00206
CITY CLERK
001-400-1121-4304 00207
CITY CLERK
001-400-1141-4304 00209
CITY TREASURER
001-400-1141-4304 00210
CITY TREASURER
00017 001-400-1201-4304 00224
03/31/89 CITY MANAGER
00017 001-400-1201-4304 00225
02/28/89 CITY MANAGER
00017
03/31/89
001-400-1202-4304 00229
FINANCE ADMIN
00017 001-400-1202-4304 00230
02/28/89 FINANCE ADMIN
R COM SYSTLMS, INC 00017 001-400-1203-4304 00227
LONG DIST/MAR 89 03/31/89 PERSONNEL
$350.00
$4.87
/TELEPHONE
$2.17
/TELEPHONE
$20.05
/TELEPHONE
$21.01
/TELEPHONE
$3.14
/TELEPHONE
$2.61
/TELEPHONE
$39.47
/TELEPHONE
$32.57
/TELEPHONE
$21.05
/TELEPHONE
00315 2975
$0.00 04/20.
00215 2975
$0.00 04/20
00315 2975,
$0.00 04/20
00215 2975•
$0 00 04/20,
00315 2975'
$0.00 04/20/
00215 2975'.
$0.00 04/20'
00315 2975'.
$0.00 04/20/
00215 2975'•
$0.00 04/20/
00315 29755
$0.00 04/20/
F 1 MANCE-S1= A340
TIIME 16:45.07
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R COM SYSTEM.
LUNG DIST/Fill
R c.0H SYSTEM:
LONG DIST/Mi-
COM SYSTEM:,
LONG DIST/FEU
INC
89
INC
89
INC
89
H
COM SYSTEM. INC
LUNG DIST/WA 89
R COM SYSTEM INC
LONG DIST/Fl it 89
R CUM SYSTEM: INC
LONG DIST/MP.t 89
R COM SYSTEM: INC
LONG DIST/F11 89
CUM SYSTEM. INC
LONG DIST/MA.: 89
R COM SYSTEMS INC
LONG DIST/FLA 89
R COM SYSTEM:, INC
LONG DIST/MA t 89
R COM SYSTEMS INC
LONG DIST/FLM 89
R c.UM SYSTEM: INC
LUNG DIST/M,i 89
R CUM SYSTEM. INC
LONG DIST/FID 89
k CUM SYSTEM: INC
LONG DIST/MA.R 89
R COM SYSTEMS, INC
LONG DIST/MAR 89
P
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND #1 ACCOUNT NUMBER TSN # AMOUNT
DATE 1NVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00017 001-400-1203-4304 00228
02/20.89 PERSONNEL
0001% 001-400-2101-4304 00362
03/31/89 POLICE
00017 001-400-2101-4304 00363
02/28/89 POLICE
00017 001-400-2401-4304 00214
03/31/89 ANIMAL CONTROL
00017 001-400-2401-4304 00215
02/28/89 ANIMAL CONTROL
00017 001--400--4101-4304 00230
03/31/89 PLANNING
00017 001-400-4101-4304 00231
02/28/89 PLANNING
00017 001-400-4201-4304 00225
03/31,89 1 BUILDING
00017
02/28/89
0001%
03/31 /89
00017
02/28/89
00017
03/31'09
0001-%
02/2689
001-400-4201-4304 00226
BUILDING
001-400-4202-4304 00230
PUB WKS ADMIN
001-400-4202-4304 00231
PUB WKS ADMIN
001-400-4601-4304 00263
COMM RESOURCES
001-400-4601-4304 00264
COMM RESOURCES
0001/ 001-400-6101-4304
03/31/89 PARKS
00017
03/31/89
001.3/
105-400-2601-4304 00106
STREET LIGHTING
$21.05
/TELEPHONE
$179.97
/TELEPHONE
$187.19
/TELEPHONE
$17.08
/TELEPHONE
$11.72
/TELEPHONE
$35.18
/TELEPHONE
$45.18
/TELEPHONE
$15 12
/TELEPHONE
$11.90
/TELEPHONE
$68.68
/TELEPHONE
$76.06
/TELEPHONE
$4/.46
/TELEPHONE
$44.26
/TELEPHONE
$0.47
/TELEPHONE
$15.16
/TELEPHONE
INV/REF
PAGE u.
DATE 04/20.
PO # CHN
AMOUNI UNENC DATE E E><t
00215 2975,
$0 00 04/20,
00315 29/5•
$0.00 04/20,
00215 2975'
$0.00 04/20
00315
$0.00 04/20
00215 2975',
$0.00 04/20..
00315 2975
$0.00 04/20:
00215 2975
$0.00 04/20•
00315 297_ •
$0.00 04/20•
00215 2975'
$0.00 04/20.
00315 2975:
$0.00 04/20/
00215 2975',
$0 00 04/20,
00315 29/::-
$0.00 04/20,
00215 2975'.
$0.00 04/20/
00315 2975
$0.00 04/20/
00315 2975•
$0.00 04/20/
1 INANCE—SFA34O
1 IME 16:45:07
1'A'/ VENDOR NAPIL
DESCRINTIUN
R CUM SYSTEms, INC
LONG DIST /FED HY
h' COM SYSTEMS, INC
LONG DIST /MAR tt'I
R COM SYSTEMS, INC
LONG DIST/FED 89
CM, OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/35/89
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN #
DAT: INVC PROD # AMOUNT
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00017
02/28/89
00017
03/J1/89
00017
02/28/89
105-400-2601-4304 00107
STREET LIGHTING
110-400-3302-4304 00229
PARKING ENF
110-400-3302-4304 00230
PARKING ENF
* ,* VENDOR FOTAL **,,; #* MRM****** ,******** *****,•; **************** *******************
$28.28
/TELEPHONE
$72.22
/TELEPHONE
$30.39
/TELEPHONE
R COMMUNICATION SUPPORT CORP.
CONS SERV/MAR 89 5.001
$1,054 31
PAGE
DATE 04
INV/REF 1'1; 4
AMOUN 1 11NENC UA 1 E
00215 2•;
$0 00 04/
00315 �y
$0.00 04/.
00215 29
$0.00 04:..
0281111 001-400-1205-4201 00028
CABLE TV
03/:11 /B9 $3,500.00 89005 001 07884 29
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*•* VENDOR TOTAL ** *** J****11 *###**#p1F####**#*##**#*n***#1k##*##***###*#*****iµnn. *0 00 04/,
R OFCR NANCYwCOUK
MEALS/NARC ENE CLASS
021/J 001-400--2101-4316 00356
04/13/89 POLICE
*:.H VENDOR I01AL**,I„***x****,:******##****#**w#***n**n**************************#*
/TRAINING
R CPRS DISTRICT i;
SEM REG/BELSER/E1,ISON
$3,500.00
$7.25
$7.25
02784 001-400-4601-4316 00106
04/113!89 COMM RESOURCES /TRAINING
3U.00
**. VENDOR TOTA1 **-„ ***„ri*************#******,.i***********************************
R DAVIS AND ASSOCIATES
TUIT/Q. KENI)ALL
0279e, 001-400-2101-4316
04/13/89 POLICE
$30 op
00355 $49.00
/TRAINING
VENDOR IUTAI. **::"***: aA**#** ;rx**#**,,,,****,:.Ita***x*****#**######*####***********
R DEPARTMENT 01: ANIMAL CAk1 �y
SHELTER COSTS/MAH 89
$49. 00
00154 001-400-2401-4251 00101
3.60
04/10:019 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT4SERVICE/GOVT
** VENDOR TOTAL**i*****,.***********#***********n*****************************i*****
R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HIGHWAY MAINT/FED 89 08705
$343.60
00267 001-400-3104-4251 00015
03/22/89 $760. 89
TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
08535
29.
$0 00 04/1
0775E
29;
$0.00 04/1
08540 2971
$0.00 04/1'r
00014 29ic
$0.00 04/2(.
108705 08168 2976
$0.00 04/20
F I I LANCE SFA340
TIIIE 16:45:07
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
it DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HIGHWAY MAINT/FED 89 08705
VND #►
DATE 1NVC
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
ACCOUNf NUMBER TRN $ AMOUNT
PRO,J * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PAGE
DATE 04/2,
INV/REF PO M CHI
AMOUNT UNENC DATE LA
00267 105-400-2601-4251 00082 4760.89
03/22/89 STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
**• VENDOR TOTAL.***+.************,r***************** *********************************
H DESERT BLASTERS
SANDBLAST SIDEWALKS
41.521. 78
02700 001-400-3104-4309 00224 43.400.00
04/12/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
VENUGH TOTAL.. **..wn***n*****nH***n****Un****4.************n*******************n,r**
R DESK CITY
43, 400. 00
108705 08168 29/c
40.00 04/2o
07644 297
$3.400 00 04/2c
01097 001-400-1201-5401 00001 4186.38 24146 06684
297(
STENO CHAIR/L... DUKE 24146 04/05/89 CITY MANAGER /EQUIPMENT—LESS THAN 450 40.00 04/21,
**. VENDOR TOTAL**,.************.*n*******.***********************************#****** 4186 38
H RIA*DEIJERLEIN
REC CLASS REFUND
02778 001-300-0000-3411
71423 04/06/89
01085 $20.00
/OTHER FACILITIES
**. VENDOR TOTAL.****************n********************************************;r******
H DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
COUNTY JDIC SYS INST. 03189
tt DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPOR.JION
TUITION/GAIL BROWN
320.00
71423 07749 297c.
40.00 04/26
00269 001-400-2101-4201 00370 4450.00 374803189 08560 297e.
03/14/89 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00 04/20
00269 001-400-2101-4316 00357 $595.00
04/10/89 POLICE /TRAINING
**s. VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
H DUNBAR NUNN CORPORATION
BLADE CUNNECIORS 5368:,
01413 001-400-2101-4311
02/08/89 POLICE
00647
41.045. 00
$52.01
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
452.01
**,: VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
H OFCR TUM*ECKERT
MEALS/VEH CODE ENF CLASS
01958 001-400-2101-4312
04/13/89 POLICE
00919 $29.00
/TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST
*** VENDOR TOTAL *************************************************+t*****************
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC CHGS/MAR 89
00165 001-400-2101-4310
03/31/89 POLICE
$29. 00
08518 297e.
40.00 04/20
53685 07922 291,
452.01 04/26
08534 297,
$0.00 04/19,
00176 $61.34 00322 297/,
/MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 40.00 04/20'
F IN.,NCE-SFA340
T IMi_ 16:45:07
PA VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
It EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC CHCS/MAR 89
▪ EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC CH( /MAR 89
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC CHCS/MAR 89
• EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC CHCS/MAR 89
it EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC CHGS/MAR 89
• EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC CHGs/MAR 89
12 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC CHGb/MAR 89
,1
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC CHGL/MAR 89
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC CHCS/MAR 89
It EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC CHCS/MAR 89
It EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC CHCS/MAR 89
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC CHCS/MAR 89
rt EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC CHGS/MAR 89
It EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC CHGS/MAR 89
• EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC CHGS/MAR 89
CITY OF HERMOSA 13EA(:I I
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE iNVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00165
03/31 /89
001-400-2101-4311 00644
POLICE
00165 001-400-2201-4311 00276
03/31'09 FIRE
00165 001-400-•2401-4311 00144
03/31'89 ANIMAL CONTROL
00165
03/31/89
00165
03/31 '09
00165
03/31.09
00165
03/31/89
001-400-3103-4309 00832
ST MAINTENANCE
001-400-3103-4311 00459
ST MAINTENANCE
001-400-3104-4311 00021
TRAFFIC SAFETY
001-400-4202-4311 00107
PUB WKS ADMIN
00165 001-400-4204-4309 01294
03/31'89 BLDG MAINT
00165
03/3189
001-400-4205-4309 00357
EQUIP SERVICE
00165 001-400-4205-4310 00131
03/31'89 EQUIP SERVICE
00165
03/31/89
001-400-6101-4309 00675
PARKS
00165 001-400-6101-4311 00181
03/31/89 PARKS
00165 105-400-2601-4311 00137
03/31'89 STREET LIGHTING
00165
03/31/89
110-400-3302-4311 00476
PARKINQ ENF
00165 160-400-3102-4311 00115
03/31/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN
$877.60
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
110.65
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
1136.32
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
PAGE
DATE 04/20
INV/REF PO it CHI/.
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXI
$85.82
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*727. 94
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
143.65
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
19.72
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
$39.03
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$412.65
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$90.47
/MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
*96. 27
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$6.01
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
$152. 92
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
$395.51
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
$124.80
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
00322 2977;x,
10.00 04/20.
00322 297/.
$0 00 04/20
00322 2977-
10 00 04/20/
00322 2977.
$0.00 04/20/
00322 2977..
10 00 04/20.
00J2 2971
$0.00 04/20.
00322 297).
$0.00 04/20/
00322 2977
$0.00 04/20,
00322 2977
$0.00 04/20,
00322 297/
*0 00 04/20,
00322 2977"
*0 00 04/20
00322 297)
*0 00 04/20,
00322 2977
$0.00 04/20,
00322 2977
$0.00 04/20.
00322 2977:J
*0.00 04/20/
F II LANCE--SFA340
TIME 16:45:07
P.r,Y VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND 41
DATE INVC
CITY OF HERMOSA REACT I
' DEMAND LIST PAGE t,
FOR 04/25/89 DATE 04/20
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN *
AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CH4
PROD # ACCOUNT DI-SCRIPIION AMOUNT UNFNC DAIL ix,
*444, VENDOR TOTAL. **4444************,,**************4a 4-*********************************** 163.270.70
tt TERRI*L.DISUN 02771 001-400-1101-4319 00075
MON EXP/MARCH 89
*31.16
07745 29/:
03/31%89 CITY COUNCIL /SPECIAL EVENTS $0 00 04/20
**H VENDOR TOTAL.-**********,rrr*************************************************o***** *31 16
rt
CITY OF *EL SEGUNDO 0278:.; 174/y100-2103-4201 0000/ *666.69 08556 297/
CAR RENTAL/NARCOTIC OFCR 04/04/89 SPEC INVESTGTN:I /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*4441 VENDOR TOTAL****************11*************44****44******************************** $666.69
*0 00 04/20.
R ELECTROAPPLIANCE REFINISHING 02611 001-400-1121-4201 0002L *148.00 5059 04590 2977,
REFINISH OFF FURNITURE 5059 04/07/89 CITY CLERK /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 04/19:
Ft ELECTROAPPLIANCE REFINISHING 02611 001-400-1141-4201 00061 *239.00 5073/5064 07364 2977
PAINT TREAS OFF FURN /5064 04/03/89 CITY TREASURER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *254 00 04/20
Lt ELECTROAPPLIANCE REFINISHING 02611 001-400-1202-4201 00161 S847.80 5073/5064 0/364 297/
PAINT FINANCE OFF FURN /5064 04/031/89 FINANCE ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $645.00 04/2u
**. VENDOR TOTAL **********44*#*#*4.*44#****##****4441.t•R**************44*#***************** $1,234.80
t2
ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 02354 001-400-3103-6900 00023 $1,736.78 00060 297)
LEASE PMT/MAY 89 04/15/89 ST MAINTENANCE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 04/20.
**4: VENDOR TOTAL*******************************4+.***********************************
$1. 736. 78
IT FAIL INVESTMENTS 0279 001-210-0000-2110 02796 *350.00 70560 08407 297h
WORK GUAR REFUND %0560 04/17/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/19:
VENDOR TOTAL **4.a******,,,.**** t*******o,,****4,,,.*****************************n***** *350.00
It FEULRAI. EXPRESS CUM-, 0196 001--400--2101--4305 00974 *24.00 6-733-73402 08561 29//
EXPRESS MAIL -/PD /3402 03/28/89 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 04/20,
*444: VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $24.00
t4 FILARSKY & WATI 00055 001-400-1203-4201 00461 $892.50 08229 29781:
LEGAL SERV/MAR 89 03/31/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/20/
•
r
FINANCE -SF A..140
TIME 16:45:)7
PAY VENDOR NAME
w DES.: R I P T I ON
VND 4
DATE INVC
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 8
PAGE 10
DATE 04/20
AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK
PROJ # ACCOUNI W. SCII IP [ION
*** VENDOR IUTAI_#*#*N**#k**#****t#***#*#***#*****###*##*#******####if####****##****##
$892. 50
R Flc_XIBIE SYSTEMS 01207 160-400-3102-4309 00367 $771.67
SEWER RODS 15860 03/31/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
` *** VENDOR IUTAI..****************k***************************************************
w
•
•
•
•
•
R MARC F. *FREEMAN
ANIMAL TRAP REFUND
*** VENDOR TOTAL
02774 001-210-0000-2110
/2415 04/03/89
$771.67
02808 $100.00
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
***********#****„**********#####***#**#*####**#***###*###***********
R RE:.I:RVL OFCR GEORGE*GARRI: fT
MEALS/SEARCH WARRANT CRS
02665 001--400--2101-4312 00923
04/10/89 POLICE
$100. 00
$7.25
/ I RAVEN- EXPENSE PUS I
*** VENDOR IUTAL**************************if******#**********************************
R
GATES MC DONALD
REIMB C. LEWIS EXP
R GATES MC DONALD
WORK COMP/MAR REIMS
02596 705-400-1217-4182 00093
04/19/89 WORKERS COMP
02596 705-400-1217-4182 00095
04/06/89 WORKERS COMP
$7.25
$.28,390.25
/WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR
$28,290 51
/WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR
*** VENDOR IOTAL****tE***********h***************************************************
R TRUDI*GEISZLER
02788 001-210-0000-2110 02794
04/17/89
$J6, 680. 76
AMOONi UNFNC DATE LX
15860 08146
2978
$0.00 04/20
72415 0/198 29/d
*0.00 04/20
00511
291u
$0 00 04/20.
Od<'37
$0.00
2'-? 7ti
04/19
08233 2978
$0.00 04/20
$50.00 72385 08413 2978'
ANIMAL TRAP REFUND :2385 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0 00 04/19
*** VENDOR ICiTAI***:tµ*****a:iE****k:,********,I***********************************u**:t** $50. 00
R CHARLES*GIRARDINI
02799 001-210-0000-2110
04/17:89
02800 $1,525.00 58987 08411 2978(
WORK GUAR REFUND 50987 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0 00 04/19
k** VENDOR IOtAL****************„********#***************************************Hk* $1,525.00
R GTEL
EQUIP RENTAL/APR 89
01340 001-400-2201-4304
04/13/89 FIRE
00166 $108.20 00426 2978/
/TELEPHONE $0.00 04/20/
FINANCE—SFA340
T , ME 16:45:07
AY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
• GTEI.
EQUIP RENTAL; APR U9
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE 1NVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
01340 001-400-4601-4304 00265 $83.17
04/13/89 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE
• VENDOR TOTAL**,e1.***1,r****************************** *****************41 *****,r,r**
• GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/NAY 89
It GUARDIAN DENIAL_
CITY HEALTH I NS/MAY 89
ft GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH 1NS/N.;Y 89
R GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/NAY 89
R GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/NAY 89
• GUARDIAN DENIAL
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
12 GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
• GUARDIAN DENIAL
CITY HEALTH INS/NAY 89
R GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
02623 001-400-1212-4188 01366
04/15/89 EMP BENEFITS
02623 105-400-2601-4188 00722
04/15/09
STREET LIGHTING
02623 110-400-3302-4188 00919
04/15/89 PARKING ENF
02623 145-400-3401-4188 00661
04/15/89 DIAL A RIDE
02623 145-400-3402-4180 00661
04/15/89 ESEA
02623 145-400-340:3-4188 00122
04/15/09
BUS PASS SUI3SDY
02623 160-400-3102-4188 00666
04/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN
02623 705-400-1209-4188 00091
04/15/89 LIABILITY INS
02623 705-400-1217-4188 00090
04/15/89 WORKERS COMP
1: .1 VENDOR TOTAL***,r***,t11-*******************tt***ir,1*********1t*****tr********rr*u
R GUILD PRINTING COMPANY. INC.
BUS CARDS/D FAIR ::H ILD 80-01
R GUILD PRINTLNG COMPANY, INC.
BUS CARDS/G. BRUTUCH 80-01
R GUILD PRINTING COMPANY. INC.
BUS CARDS/K. ROBERTSON 80-01
00202 001-400-1141-4305 00086
03/30/89 CITY TREASURER
00202 001-400-1141-4305 00087
03/30/89 CITY TREASURER
00202 001-400-4101-4305 00305
03/30/89 PLANNING
PAGE
DATE 04/20,
INV/REF PO # CHM.
AMOUNT UNENC DAIS EX.
$191.37
$1,575.65
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$3.44
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$99.01
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$10.30
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$5.23
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$,'•. 66
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$5.16
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$11.10
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$22.20
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
**,r**
$1,734 75
00426 29/8
$0.00 04/20.
00001 29781
$0 00 04/20.
00001 2918t
$0.00 04/20:
00001 2978r
$0 00 04/20,
0000129/br
$0.00 04/20.
00001 297th
$0.00 04/20.
00001 29/8!
$0 00 04/20:
00001 29781
$0.00 04/20
00001 2978
$0.00 04/20.
00001 29781
$0.00 04/20:
$40.83 122380-01 07736 2978'
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $100.00 04/20,
$40.83
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
122380-01 07736 2970-
$0.00 04/20.
$40.83 122380-01 07736 2978,'
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *50.00 04/20/
FII
T[t
P.
,NCE-SFA340
16 45:07
VEND iR NAME
DESCRIPTION
GUILD PRINTING COMPANY, INC.
PRIN1 SPRING CLASS PROG 08-01
GUIL.D PRINTING COMPANY, INC.
BUS CARDS/M. ERNST 00-01
GUILD PRINTING COMPANY, INC.
BUS CARDS/J R REVICZKY 80-01
GU11 0 PRINTING COMPANY, INC.
BUS CARDS/R REZNICHEK 80-01
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND 1; ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROD 10 ^.C,CUUN I DI_ScH IP T I ON
PAGE
DATE 04/20
INV/REF PO # CHF.,
AMUUN1 UNEMC DATE Lk
00202 001--400-4601-4302 00043 $1,706.13 122228-01 07738 2970
03/30/89 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING $1.600 00 04/20
00200 001--400-4601-•4305 00659 $40.83
03/30/89
COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
00202 001-400-4601-4305 00660 $40.83
03/30/89
COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
0020' 001--400-4601-4305 00661 $40.80
03/30/89
COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
**+ VENDOR TOTAL *********** ***** ********************************************* ****
HAINES AND COMPANY
1-. A DIRECTORY LEASE
00878 001-400-2101-4305 009/7
51047, 04/05/09 POLICE
$1,951.08
122380-01
122380--01
122380-01
07736
$40.83 04/20
07/36 2778
$40.83 04/20
07/36 ,2Y/U
$68.34 04/20
$213.66 51047 OU:,5 i'
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
kg, VENDI.IR TGTAL.-***********u****,,:,*******n,.,,*10-*-,,rar **.***u+�a�* I**********u**********
MELISSA*HARKED
THEATRE TECH/4-9--89
02785 001-400-4601-4201 0030/
04/11/89 COMM RESOURCES
$213 68
$65.00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
**:. VENDOR TOTAL*****************:,********ft*****,f;t*******************************4*R
**:
STEVE*HARTT
MEALS/SIDS CLASS
$65.00
00896 001-400-2101-4312 00922 $7.25
04/13/89 POLICE /1RAVEL EXPENSE POST
$7. 25
VENDOR TCI FAL*****************g**************************************************
HERMOSA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 00322 001-400-2401-4201 00190 $114.00
MISC CHCS/MAR 89 03/31.09 ANIMAL CONTROL :LONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
**: VENDOR TOTAL****************,t-********x*****,,*********************************** $114.00
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
COMP SYS MAINT/APR 89 A1V92
HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY
SOFTWARE SUPP/APR—JUN 89 C3639
00149
04/01/89
00149
04/01/89
001--400-1206-4201 00525 $1,223.00 26A1V92
DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
001-400-1206-4201 00526 $2,667.83 7KC3639
DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$U 00 04/20
0//5U
09/'.
$0.00 04/19
07971
29/9
$0.00 04/19
00327
24/9
$0 00 04/20
00009 2979
$0.00 04/20
00032 2979
$0.00 04/20,
rr
•
•
•
F MANCE - Sl- A340
TIME 16:45:07
f',.'1 VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
*1,
CITY OF HERMOSA UEAt.I 1
DEMAND LIST PAGE ,.
FOR 04/25/89 DATE 04/20
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF" PO #
DATE L NVC PROJ # ACCOUNI 0.:3CR IP 1 I ON AMOUNT UNLNC DA IL LA
rt
HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY 00149 001-400-1206-4201 0052/ *2,172.00 25Y1V30 00010 2979
COMP TERM MAINT/APR—JUN ','1V30 04/01/89 DATA PROCESSING; /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0 00 04/20
VENDOR fl'iTAI ***km**** ******.s*************M,i**************************k1,kkm***
$6,062 83
rt HOLIDAY INN 02646 001-400-2101-4312 00910 *254.88 013541 29/'1
LODGING/D. RICKEY 04/13/89 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *0 00 04/1v
k 4 VLNIiUH fIITAI +*k.kir**kua****i. ***********nui,4it***4*************** *** *.u1,u:,*k** $254.88
**
R HOLIES HADIAIOR SERVICE 00277 001-400•-2101-4311 00648 $146.97 93150 07991 297
RECORE RADIATOR '/3150 04/11/89 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 04/20
VENU1:IR TIJTAI ***a************
********k ****** w.,***:.* N*************H*******i* ka ***ii
$146 97
rt INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECGRIC 02458 001-400-4204-4309 01295 $309.49 07601 291v
CITY HALL LITE FIXTURES 04/17/69 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0 00 04/20
VENUUR IUTAL-***a,a***k*k***#k,.********kx*****le,r**w*4************m********.„-„rk**
*309 49
• FRED 5.*JAMES & CO.— CALIF 02782 705-400-1210-4201 00030 $997.00 147612 08228 297v
DAMAGE INS/FIRE VEHICLES 47612 03/27/89 AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0 00 04/20
VENDOR TOTAL ***********
****iNx********h*****k*******************************k***
$997.00
• PAUL*JENSEN 02775 001-210-0000-2110 02805 $50.00 68920 07197 2979
ANIMAL TRAP REFUND ,H920 04/03/89
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00
**:• VENUCIR TLITAL ***a ************, ********f, *****H****•,t******************,. **fr uN r.si k* $50 00
*H
04/20
It JOBS AVAILABLE 01165 001-400-1203-4201 00462 $208.80 89-07-049 08226 2980
EMP ADVERTISING 1-049 03/29/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/20
VENLJi1R TOTAL***uk***********!,u********:t*****,f****************************„41,44**
$208 80
R KELLY PAPER COMPANY 00212 001-400-1208-4305 00624 $1,233.27 106974 07367 2980
COPIER PAPER 06974 03/27/89 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 04/20.
r
•
0
I
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 16:45:07
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
*,i* VENDOR TOTAL **w***ii-** ****+rig****************************************************
(t
* * *
OFCR BONNIE:*KEI•IDALI-
MEALS/MILES/DOM VIOL
R OFCR BONNIL*KENDALL
MEALS/CORR TRNG COURSE
R
OFCR IJONN I L *KEI'IUAL I
MEALS/REPT WRITING CLASS
R
02174 001-400-2101-4312
04/13/89 POLICE
02174
04/13/89
021/4
04/13/89
031-400-2101-4313
POLICE
001-400-2101-4316
POLICE
PAGE
DATE 04/.
INV/REF PO # CI
AMOUNE UNENC DA(E 1
$1,233.27
00918 $72.56
/TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST
00199
$150.00
/TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC
003:i4 $7.25
/TRAINING
VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
BUTCH*KUFL/K
027/6 001-210-0000-2110
04/03/89
$229.81
WORK GUAR REFUND 67088 02806 $150.00 67088
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
*** VENDOR TOTAL*******,************************************************************
R LEARNED LUMBER
MISC CHGS/MAR 89
R LEARNED LUMBER
MISC CHGS/MAR 89
R LEARNED LUMBER
MISC CHVS/MAR 89
R LEARNED LUMBER
MISC CHCS/MAR 89
R LEARNED LUMBER
MISC CHCS/MAR 89
R LEARNED LUMBER
MISC CHGS/MAR 89
00167 001-400-2201-4309 00670
03/31/89 FIRE
00167 001-400-3103-4309 00834
03/31/89 ST MAINTENANCE
001-400-6101-4309 00676
PARKS
001-400-8604-4309 00125
CIP 86-604
001-400-8611-4309 00003
CIP 88-611
160-400-3102-4309 00366
SEWER/ST DRAIN
00167
03/31/89
00167
03/31/89
00167
03/31/89
00167
03/31/89
$150.00
$28.95
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$15.23
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$12.43 ,
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$335.33
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$98.84
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$12.41
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
**,. VENUUR TOTAI********************************************************************
PAUL E.*LEWKOWICZ
THEATRE TECH/MAR 27,89
*503.19
02619 001-400-4601-4201 00312 $20.00
03/30/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
085:36
291
$0.00 04/1
08530
291
$0.00 04/I'
08525
$0.00 04/1
07195
296
$0. 00 04/2,
00331
29L;,
$0 00 04/2
00331
298(
$0.00 04/2c.
00331
298(
$0.00 04/26
00331 2986
$0.00 04/2<:
00331 290,.
$0. 00 04/2c,
00331 2980
$0.00 04/20
07744 2980
$0.00 04/20
•
• ,
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1INANCE-SFA340
TIME 16:45:07
PAY VENDOR 1 (AME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE t,
FOR 04/25/89 DATE 04/20
VND s ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4 CHh
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
VENDOR TOTAL**-q.•w**:.************************************************************ $20.00
AMOUNT UNENC DAIS Ek
R LOMITA BLULI'RINI SERVICE, INC 00077 001-400-4101-4305 00304 327.74 00333 298:.
I1ISC CHCS/MAR 89 03/31/89 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 04/20
R LOMITA BLULI'RINI SERVICE, INC 00077 115-400-8171-4201 00028 $75.69 00333 298u
IIISC CHuS/MAR 89 03/31/89 CIP 85-171 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/20
LOMITA BLUL1'RINI SERVICE, INC 00077 150-400-8102-4201 00027 $220.67 00333 290u
MISC CHOS/MAH 89 03/31/89 CIP 85-102 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/20
µ** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $324.10
R LOS ANGELES BASIN CHAP. 1CB0 01067 001-400-4201-4316 00147 $35.00 07530 298u
SEM REG/W. GROVE 04/10/89 BUILDING /TRAINING $0.00 04/20
VENDOR TOTAL.********************************************************************
$35.00
CITY OF -*LOS ANGELES 02797 001-400-2101-4251 00261 $226.44 00530 298u-
AWWS CLOSE-OUT BILLING 04/13/89 POLICE /CON1RACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 04/19
** VENDOR TOTAL***k***u************************************************************ $226.44
R LOS ANGELES CU CIV SERV COMM. 00869 001-400-1203-4251 00115 $1,909.04 89-04 08230 29r1u
MARCH 89 SERVICES 89-04 03/29/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 04/20
*** VENDOR TOTAL********a.*********************************************************** $1,909.04
R
LOS ANGELES CO. ASSESSOR 02769 001-400-4201-4251 00030 $833.60 07528 2901
MICROFICHE UFDATE'; 04/04/89 BUILDING /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 04/20
** VENDOR TOTAL.***t***ya*********************************************************** $833.60
R COUNTY OF *LOS ANGELES 00287 001-400-4101-4305 00303 $35.70 1359 06094 2981.
MAP REVISIONS 1359 04/04/89 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 04/19
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$35.70
R LOS ANGELES TIMES 00213 001-400-1203-4201 00460 $536.37 13-011397 07097 2981,
EMPLOYEE ADVERTISING 11397 04/02/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $578.29 04/20,
i
s
FINANCE--SFA3-1 O
TIME 16:45:07
PAY VEND(IR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R LOS ANGELES TIMES
EMPLIIYEE ADS
t2 LOS ANGELES TIMES
EMPLUYEE ADS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND it ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PAGE
DATE 04/20
INV/REF PO 4 CHf
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EA
00213 001-400-1203-4201 00463 41,237.20 13-011397 08217
11397 04/02/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00
(1397
00213 001-400-1203-4201 00464
04/02/89 PERSONNEL.
4220.53 13-011397 08222
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00
*** VENDOR T(ITAL********************************************+r***********************
• MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
• MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
• MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITY HEALTH TNS/MAY 89
R MANAGE[) HEALTH NETWORK
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
41, 994. 10
01859 001-400-1212-4188 01364 4850.40
04/17/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
01859
04/17/89
01859
04/17/89
01859
04/17/89
105-400-2601-4188 00721
427.87
STREET LIGHTING /EMPL.OYEE BENEFITS
110-400-3301-4188 00698
42.74
VEH PKG DIST /EMPL.OYEE BENEFITS
110-400-3302-4188 00918 4173.55
PARKING ENF /EMPL.OYEE BENEFITS
01859 145-400-3401-4188 00660 41.10
04/17/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
01859 145-400-3402-4188 00660
04/17/89 ESEA
01859
04/17/89
01859
04/17/89
01859
04/17/89
01859
04/17/89
01859
04/17/89
145-400-3403-4188 00121
40.36
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
40.55
BUS PASS SUBSD'r /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
155-400-2102-4188 00340
42.29
CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
160•-400-3102-4188 00665
421.93
SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
705-400-1209-4188 00090
42.29
LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
705-400-1217-4188 00089
44.58
WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R MANHATTAN CAR WASH
MISC CHGS/FEB & MAR 89
$1.087.66
2981
04/20
2981
04/20
00041 2981
40.00 04/1Y
00041
2981
40.00 04/19
00041
2901
40.00 04/19
00041
2981
40.00 04/19
00041
2981
40.00 04/19
00041 2981
40.00 04/19,
00041
2981
40 00 04/19,
00041
2981.
40.00 04/19.
00041
2981
40.00 04/19/
00041 2981
40.00 04/19,
00041
2981:
40.00 04/19
01146 001-400-2101-4311 00645 4186.45 00336 29814
03/31/89 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 40.00 04/20/
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 16:45:07
PAY VENDOR N. IL
DESCRIPTI iN
VND N
DATE 1NVC
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $
PROJ # ACCOUN1
PAGE 0
DATE 04/20
AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4 CHh
DESCRIPTION
**44 VENDOR TOTAL. ,.#*****************************************************************
R MANIACL INSURANCE SERVICES, INC
FEB -APR E.-7 PREM/CTY MGR
AMOUNi UNLNC DAZE Eli!
$186.45
02673 001-400-1212-4188 01365 $99.94
04/19/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
VENDOR TOTAL.*******************************************************************
R MAROUET I LEASE. SERVICES, INC.
LEASE PMI 'MAY 89
R MARGUETT, LEASE SERVICES. INC.
LEASE PM1'MAY 89
0227.' 001-400-2101-6900 00413
04/15/89 POLICE
$99.94
$1, 072. 55
/LEASE PAYMENTS
02272 001-400-2101-6900 00415 $1,233.52
04/15/89 POLICE
/LEASE PAYMENTS
**., VENDOR TOTAL,*******************************************************************
R STEVEN*hl,. NICHOLS
WORK GUAR.NTEE REFUND 67081
**.. VENDOR TOTAL.
02791 001-210-0000-2110
04/17%89
$2, 306. 07
02791 $175.00 67081
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
N***********###*************##*:t*#****#*****#####*######***********
R MERCURY .IR GROUP
GASOLINE/.ITY YARD
ft MERCURY ..1R GROUP
GASOLINE/'.:ITY YARD
02537 001-141-0000-1401 00035
62628 02/28/89
02537 001-141-0000-1401 00036
63512 03/31/89
$175.00
$3.291.39
/GASOLINE INVENTORY
$5, 195. 94
/GASOLINE INVENTORY
*** VENDOR TOTAL.:*****************#*************************************************
R
KATHLEEN MIDSTUKKE
MON EXP/JN-MAR 89
R KATHLEEN M1DSTUKKE
MON EXP/J.N-MAR 89
H KATHLEEN NIDSTOKKE
MON EXP/JAN-MAR 89
R KATHLEEN'MIDSTOKKE
MON EXP/JAN-MAR 89
01549
04/05/89
001-400-1101-4317 00312
CITY COUNCIL
01549 001-400-1121-4317 00040
04/05/89 CITY CLERK
01549
04/05/89
001-400-1122-4201 00175
ELECTIONS
01549 705-400-1209-4201 00092
04/05/89 LIABILITY INS
$8, 487. 3d
$8.00
/CONFERENCE EXPENSE
$8.00
/CONFERENCE EXPENSE
$10.60
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
00419 2981
$0.00 04/20:
00059 2981.
$0.00 04/20.
00056 2981,
$0.00 04/20
08409 2981
$0.00 04/19
62628 08119 2981.
$0.00 04/20
63512 08147 2981.
$0.00 04/20;
04588 2981'
$0.00 04/20,
04588 2981
$0.00 04/20
04588
2981
$0.00 04/20.
$18.80 04588 2981'
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/20.
F I I'IANCE-SFA340
TIME 16:45:07
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE 1NVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
**r. VENDOR TOTAI **** ****4* ******,.***************************************************
R MONARCH BROOM
MISC CHCS/APR 89
PA,,E
DATE 04/20
INV/REF PO ;; CHF,.
AMOUNT UNENC DATE Ex
*45 40
00084 001--400-3103-4309 00831 $1,686.96
04/19/89 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
**I, VENDOR TOTAL *******I„ ******t„ ***************************************************
R MYERS STEVENS & COMPANY
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
00091 001-400-1212-4188 01363
04/17/89 EMP BENEFITS
$1.686.96
$853.20
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL *******************************************************************
k NEW PACIFIC LUMLi R CO.
MISC CHCS/MAR 89 1.8216
00606 001-400--3103-4309 00833
$853.20
$82.43
03/31/89 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MA1EHIAL.S
*** VENDOR TOTAL********,,********k***********************************************,I**
R ORAL HEALTH SERVICE=S
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
L2 ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
EI ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
I2 ORAL HEALTH SERV1CLS
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
11 ORAL HEALTH SERV I CLS
CITY HEALTH 1NS/MAY 89
R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
$82.43
00235 001-400-1212-4188 01367 *1,193. 70
04/15/89 EMP BENEFIT$ /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00235 105-400-2601-4188 00723 $52.71
04/15/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00235 110-400-3301-4188 00699 $4.32
04/15/89 VEH PKG DIST /LMPLUYEE BENEFITS
00235 110-400-3302-4188 00920 $339.67
04/15/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00235 145--400-3401-4188 00662 $0.58
04/15/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00235 145-400-3402-4188 00662 $0.29
04/15/89 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00235 155-400-2102-4188 00341 $5.93
04/15/89 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00235 . 160-400-3102-4188 00667 $43.09
04/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00438 290,:
$0.00 04/20
00013
c9LLr--'
$0 00 04/19
568216 00339
290_.
$0 OU 04/20
00019 290:
$0.00 04/20
00019 2982
$0 00 04/20
00019 290
$0.00 04/20
00019 2982.
$0.00 04/20,
00019 29E1.'
$0.00 04/20
00019 2982
$0.00 04/20.
00019 29u,'
$0.00 04/20:
00019 2982:
$0.00 04/20
•
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 16:45.07
PA'. VENDOR it .ME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 00.
FOR 04/25/89 DATE 04/20/;
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO N i.HI1
AMOUNT 11NENC DATE E: XF
DATE I NVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DIi. CN 1P I ION
*** VENDOR FOTAI****f***************************Trutt********************************* $1,640 29
Ft PACIFIC- BELL. TELEPHONE 00321 001-400-2101-4304 00365 $150.40 00036 298.•I
COMP HOLIKUP/APR 89 04/10/89 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 04/20/
*** VENDOR TOTAL****w*****,r****************w***************************************
$150.40
Lc PACIFlt BALL-:, 01649 001-400-2201-5402 00007 $1,466.03 9744/ 08309 298,2E
REFRIGEkATOR/F-IRE DEPT 97447 04/06/89 FIRE /EQUIP—MORE THAN $500 $0.00 04/20/
*** VENDOR TOTAI.********************************k*********************************** $1.466.03
• PACIFIC ARE 00575 001-400-1212-4188 01360 $12,971.41
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89 04/17/09 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00016 29112
$0.00 04/19/
R PACIFIC ARE 00575 105-400-2601-4188 00719 $495.56 • 00016 29826
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89 04/17/89 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 04/19:
• PACIFItARE 00575 110-400-3301-4188 00696 $30.88 00016 29U2'
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89 04/17/89 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 04/19:
V R PACIFIC.ARE 00575 110-400-3302-4188 00916 $2,030.15 00016 2982t
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89 04/17/89 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0 00 04/19:
4 R Pe C1FI. ARE 00575 145-400-3401-4188 00658 $7.21 00016 298.2e
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89 04/17/89 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 04/19/
✓ R PACIFI.:ARE 00575 145-400-3402-4188 00658 $2.06 00016 2982e
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89 04/17/09 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ' $0.00 04/19:
12 PAC1F1:.ARE 00575 145-400-3403-4188 00119 $4. 12 00016 2982:
CITY HEALTH 1NS/MAY 89 04/17/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 04/19.
R PACIFIL:ARE 00575 155-400-2102-4188 00338 $45.37 00016 2982,
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89 04/17/89 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 04/19.
• PAC IF Ii.ARE 00575 160--400-3102-4188 00663 $355.00 00016 2902:
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89 04/17/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 04/19
.i *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $15,941.76
• PAGENEI' 02487 001-400-1201-4201 00046 $11.50 00059 2982:
PAGING .SERV/APR 89 04/01/89 CITY MANAGER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/20.
1
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 16:45:07
PAY VENDOR NAMI
DESCRIPTIOI
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE u
FOR 04/25/89 DATE 04/20
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TON # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHP
DATE INVC PRO.J # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EX
R PAGENET 02487 001-400-2101-4307 00166 *115.00 00059 29th'
PAGING SER' APR 89 04/01/89 POLICE
/RADIO MAINTENANCE *0 00 04/20
##w VENDOR TOTAL #,. .*****######*A.*******M####i.R******######************####itniF##kit
$126.50
R PAK WEST 00519 001-400-4204-4309 01298 $1.068.17 612159/610121 08134 291i.
JANITOR SUI LIES 10121 03/21/89 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0 00 04/20
**a VENDOR TOTAL *
1 ############it * #######*h####i, w*.***######it #it ################;t##it ##
$1.068. 17
OFCR JOSEI I1PELKA 00950 001-400-2101-4312 00917 *20.28 08537 2982
MILES/AIDS :LASS 04/13/89 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST $0.00 04/19
R OFCR JOSEI I*PELKA 00950 110-300--0000-3902 00018
FINAL PMT/I IMB BURGLARY /5041 04/10/89
##* VENDOR TOTAL
366.10 75041 0/376 298
/REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR $0.00 04/20
1F###*#*######A###****#######i.R########*#####*#######*######*#####
*86.38
R PEP BOYS 00608 001-400--2201-4311 00277 *21.59 00442 298:1
MISC CHCS/. H 89 04/15/89 FIRE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *0.00 04/20
##+t VENDOR TOTAL #
* #### #### #### * 1a## #### ## # ##** * R# #### ## ## ## #### ########## ## # # # # ####
$21.59
R PETER'S Ni SERIES 02367 001-400-8604-4309 00127 *125.00 2313 07690 2983
PLANTS/CIT'. HALL FOYER 2313 02/28/89 CIP 86-604 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *125.00 04/20
*125.00
##i; VENDOR TOTAL #,. n*****************#********g***********************************
R PITNEY 801 S 0022;. 001-400-1208-4201 00538 $185.31 738764 08006 2983
RESET POSTS E METER 38764 04/10/89 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE./PRIVAT *0 00 04/20
*** VENDOR TOTAL it::############ii#########*####4ia################################### $185.31
R POSTMASTEI 00097 001-400-2101-4305 00975 *72.00 307 08515 29E03
P. O. BOX h NIAL 3071 04/10/89 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 04/20
*** VENDOR TOTAL#it,#************#*************************************************#*
*72. 00
R POSTMASTEh 00398 110-400-3302-4305 00557 $2.000.00 07893 2983•
CITE NOTICE POSTAGE 04/05/89 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 30.00 04/20
iIJ
ri
FINANCE—LI A340
TIME 16:4:07
PA V& NDOR LAME
LI SCR IF KION
**+, VENUUI< TOTi
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TAN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PRO./ # ACCOUNT DLUCRIPTION
#**I,***********,A..k**************Rif**********************************
ft PRINCI 'AL CASUALTY INS t.0
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
K I'R INC I 'AL CASUALTY INS. CO
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
Ft PRINCI 'AL CASUALLY INS i O
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
Ft PRINCI 'AL CASUALTY INS. CO.
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R PRINCI 'AL CASUALTY INS. CO.
CITY HE;LTH INS/MAY 89
R PRINCI'AL CASUALTY INS CU
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R PRINCI 'AL CASUALTY INS + f)
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
00585 001-400-1212-4188 01368
04/15/89 EMP BENEFITS
00585 1057400-2601-4188 00724
04/15/89
STREET LIGHTING
00585 110-400-3301-4188 00700
04/15/89 VEH PKG DIST
00585 110-400-3302-4188 00921
04/15/89 PARKINQ ENF
00585 160-400-3102-4188 00668
04/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN
00585 705-400--1209-4188 00092
04/15/89 LIABILITY INS
00585 705-400-1217-4188 00091
04/15/89 WORKERS COMP
PAUL-.
DATE 04/20
INV/REF PO # CNH
AMOUNT UNENC L,AFE Ex
$2,000 00
$67.25
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.50
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.50
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$4.25
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$1.00
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$1.25
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$1.25
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTE,****************Mu************************************************** $76 00
* * *
K PROF (.: IMMUNICATIONS INSTALLERS
PATROL :AR RADIO EQUIP 0217
VENDOR TOTA
02526 001-400-2101-5402 00036
03/29/89 POLICE
$3,964.04
/EQUIP—MORE THAN $500
********************************************************************
R RALPH ANDERSON & ASSOCIAILS
SEM REQ 'M. FEHSKENS
*** VENDOR TOTE
02786 001-400-1207-4316 00035
04/12/89 BUS LICENSE
$3, 964 04
$300.00
/TRAINING
**** ** * * ** ** * ** * 1A * ** * * ** * * * ***** k k ** **** * * ** ********* ***** **** * * ** * *
R 1 rdREN'A !EEC)
WORK GU \R REFUND
01916 001-210-0000-2110
43505 04/17/89
$300.00
00038 298.s
$0.00 04/20
00038 2983
$0.00 04/20
00038 298.i
$0.00 04/20
00038 2983
$0.00 04/20
000:18 298.1
30 00 04/20
00038 2983
$0.00 04/20
00038 29U
$0.00 04/20
0217 07960 2983
$3,964 04 04/20
01763
298.1
$0.00 04/19
02799 $750.00 4350: 08403 298.3
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00
*** VENDOR TOTAA.******************************************************************** $750.00
K 1EGISTtAR—RECORDER 00225 001-400-1122-4201 00174
NOV 88 ::LECTION COSTS 116—E 03/20/89 ELECTIONS
04/19
$10,227.17 116•-E 04591 2983'
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/19,
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0
1IME 16:45:07 FOR 04/25/89 DATE 04/20
P,. VENDOR •IAME VND 8 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO N CHK
DESCR I FI' I ON DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE LA
Al **, VENDOR TOTA, . ***,• *******************•a•*•a i***** r*********************************** $10,227.17
'• K OFCR b. VID*RICKEY 00949 001-400-2101-4312 00921 $100.00 08532 298.1
MEALS/DUI SEMINAR 04/13/89 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 04/19
'41 **„ VENDOR TOTAL**************************.,***************************************** $100.00
v I MAGNOI lA*R(J1IERfS 0277 001-210--0000-2110 02810 $100.00 71.1/8 0/200 290.1
WORK GUAR REFUND 71378 04/03/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/20
*** VENDOR TOTF•t_**************************.****•************************************* $100.00
R MIKE*1 •., J TH 02794 001-210-0000-2110 02797
WORK G(AR REFUND 74751 04/17/89
R MIKE*KUTH 02794 001-210-0000-2110 02803
WORK GI -AR REFUND 59009 04/17/89
*150. 00
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
74751 08404 2984
$0.00 04/1v
*1,550.00 59009 08405 2984
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/199
(41 VENDOR T01,1-**a:.µ***II*uir*************a,,***************************************** $1,700.00
R SAFEWt( SIGN COMPANY 00021 001-400-3104-4309 00225 $491.71 33042 08103 2984
STREET SIGNS
33042 04/07/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*Oh VENDOR T01,1..***A*********************i,u*****f************************u********** $491 71
R CAMILIE*SHAKKOUR 02779 110-300-0000-3843 06229
*50. 00
$491.71 04/20
07876 2984
PARKIN( PERMIT REFUND 03/28/89 /PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL *0 00 04/20
**a VENDOR TO1, 1- ***:tau****ii,E*************u*****:<e*****,t*****************,Fu********** $50 00
N SHAW t NG I NE. R I NG 0279:i 001-210-0000-2110 02798 $150.00 70602 08406 2984
WORK GI 'AR REFUND
70602 04/17/89
R :SHAW t NGINLLR1NG 0275' 001-210-0000-2110 02802
WORK GUAR REFUND
/0602 04/17/89
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00
$1,575.00
04/19
70602 08408 290•.
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0. 00 04/19
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,725.00
R SIR SrEEDY 00361 110-400-3302-4305 00558 $127.01 8540 07848 2984
EVALUA BION FORMS 8540 04/10/89 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *127.01 04/20
0
FIN'NCE—SFA340
TIME 16:45:07
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
PAGE 00.
DATE 04/20/
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK
DATE INVC PRO.) # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNL_NC DATE EXI
*** VENDOR TOTAL ****a************n**************************************************
* * *
It
SO BAY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 69927
VENDOR TOTAL
02773 001-210-0000-2110
04/93/89
4127.01
02811 $500.00
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
***********************a -a*******************************************
SOURISSEAU SECURITY SYS, INC.
BACKGRND INV/WILHITE 1252
R SOURISSEAU SECURITY SYS, INC.
BACKGRND/GREEN/U'NEILL /1239
02075 001-400--2101-4201
04/18/89 POLICE
02075 0017400-2101-4201
03/27/89 POLICE
00368
$500.00
69927 07199 2904/
40.00 04/20/
4420.00 1252 08542 29E14r.
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00 04/19i
00371 445.00 1238/1239
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENU(IR TOTAL****,:,4,1*********,,*******aw,r****************,rk****************4t;en*t.
K SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL
PRIS SERV/POLICE
00107 001-400-2101-4201
04/13/89 POLICE
$465.00
00369 4393.40 .
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL****,,urr**********A********,,,*****************************;r**********
***
• SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT
CITE COURT BAIL
00400 110-300-0000-3302
04/13/89
4393.40
26824 4100.00
/COURT FINES/PARKING
VENDOR TOTAL ****, ,,,t**********,****r***it,r****************************************
R SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY
PAINT TRUCK PERMIT FEES 22-89
01688
03/16/89
001-400-3104-4251 00014
TRAFFIC SAFETY
4100. 00
08555 298411
40.00 04/20/
08539 2984:
$0 00 04/19
07896 29854
40.00 04/19,
4270.00 007274-22-89 08163 2985,
/CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
**„ VENDOR TCITAL****M,********************u*****************************************
▪ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN CO
MON ELEC BILIS/MAR 89
N SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN CO
MON ELEC BILLS/MAR 89
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
MON ELEC BILLS/MAR 89
00159
03/31/89
00159
03/31/89
00159
03/31/89
001-400-3101-4303 00036
MEDIANS
001-400-3104-4303 00018
TRAFFIC SAFETY
001-400-4204-4303 00304
BLDG MAINT
$2701 00
$71.17
/UTILITIES
$593.05
/UTILITIES
$5,598.67
/UTILITIES
40.00 04/20.
00352 2905.
40.00 04/20
00352 2985.
40.00 04/20
00352 2985
$0.00 04/20
FItiANCE -SFAJ40
TIME 16.45:07
PtY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
Il SOUTHERN CAI
MON ELEC BILL
12 SOUTHERN CAI.
PION ELEC BILL
R SOUTHERN CAL
MON ELEC BILL
IFORNIA EDISIIN CO.
S/MAR 89
IFORNIA EDISIIN CO.
S/MAR 89
IFORNIA EDISUN CO.
S/MAR 89
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00159 001-400--6101-4303 00249 $593.81
03/31/89 PARKS
/UTILITIES
00159 105-400-2601-4303 00185 $248.52
03/31/89 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES
00159 160-•400-3102-4303 00104 $62.52
03/31/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /UTILITIES
**:. VENDOR TOTAL ***..*********************u sae********************************* **u***
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISIIN CO.
ST LIGHTING BILLS/MAR 89
PAGE
DATE 04/20
INV/REF PO $ CLIP,
AMOUNT UNENC: DATE Lk,
$7. 167. 74
00442 105-400-2601-4303 00186 $14,844.88
03/31/89 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES
*u. VENDOR TOTAL.***al:**********u,,i,*******;.,n******* *******,********************* 1.**
K SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP
COOLER RENT/MAR 89 42786
$14,844.88
00352 29155
$0 00 04/20
00352 2985
$0.00 04/20
00352 2985.
$0.00 04/20
00013 2985
$0 00 04/20
00146 001-400-4601-4305 00658 $47.64 0342786 00033 2985
03/31/89 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 04/20
**,. VENDOR TOTAL***u************u***************************************************
R SPECIAL LETTERS
02728 001-400-2101-4305
RECRUIT CERTIFICATES %3002 03/14/89 POLICE
$47.64
00976 $46.86 89073002 08512 2985'
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 04/20
VENDOR TOTAL ****4***********m********************************************#,**t.**
It SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO
SWEEP SERV/MAR 89 2356
li
SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO
SWEEP SERV/MAR 89 2356
$46 86
00115 001-400-3103-4201 00217 $2,375.10 2356 00029 2985:
03/31/89 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/20
00115 110-400-3301-4201 00208 $2.902.90 2356 00029 2985.
03/31/89 VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/20
**;. VENDOR TOTAL ***;.***********;rF*********-r*****************************************
12 MR MARK L. 1STREIFF
CITE PMT REFUND 91365
02780 110-300-0000-3302 26825
04/05/89
$5,278.00
$18.00
/COUR1 FINES/PARKING
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R MARGUERITE*STURGES
MILEAGE REIMB/CPPA CONF
$18.00
00620 110-400-3302-4317 00110 $106.40
04/05/89 PARKING ENF /CONFERENCE EXPENSE
791365 07886 2985
$0.00 04/2U
07889 2985r
$0.00 04/20
F I I LANCE- SFA340
TINE 16:45:07
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0
FOR 04/25/89 DATE 04/20
VND # ACCOUN1 NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF I'U N CHh
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE L.
**-, VENDOR TOTAL_***::************.*********k*********4******************************* $106.40
R SUPER SPORTS 002768 001-400-4601-4308 00161
VOLLEYBALLS
$498.42 1240 07741 2911_
1240 03/27/89 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS $0.00 04/20
*** VENDOR TOTAL***!:**********************>e***************************************** $498.42
R
TAI-YU SU 02694 001-210-0000-2110 02801 $7,775.00 26391 08402 298e_
WORKGUAR REFUND .:6391 04/17/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0 00 04/19
*** VENDOR TOTAL***3.-**************************************************************** $7,775.00
• PAT*TEVER8AUGH 02789 001-210-0000-2110 02793 $50.00 76255 08412 2986
ANIMAL TRAP REFUND ,6255 04/17/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/19
**u VENDOR TOTAL***u******:,*****!.:r********u***************************************** $50.00
R TIME BUSINESS FORM:_i 01516 001--400--4201-4305 00427 $101.05 41461 07:L2b 298e.
PRINT SERV/BUILDING 41461 03/29/89 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0 00 04/20
**„ VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $101.05
• TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 00124 001-400-3101-4309 00016
MISC CHGS/MAH 89
$18.97 943844 00357 29136
43844 03/31/89 MEDIANS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 04/20.
VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
$18.9?
• TODD PIPE AND SUPPLY 02221 001-400-3101-4309 00017 $84.96 115566 00457 2986
MISC CHGS/APR 89 15566 04/15/89 MEDIANS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 04/20
**k VENDUR 10TAL***un*****!t*****!k*******,,:r*****************************************
$84.96
It TORI'tANCE NISSAN 00125 170-400-2103-4201 -2103-4201 00006 $1,200.00 00060 29em,
RENTAL PMT/MAY & JUN 89 04/15/89 SPEC INVESTOTNS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/20
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,200.00
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 001-400-1212-4188 01357 $209.18 00029 2986
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89 04/15/89 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *0.00 04/19.
F 11IANCE- SFA340
TIME 16:45:07
M A i
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
TRANSAMER I l:.. OCCIDENTAL
CITY HEALTH LOS/MAY 89
TRANSAMER IC.. OCC I01 NTAl
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL.
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
TRANSAMER I Gi. OCCIDENTAL..
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL
CITY HEALTH 1NS/MAY 89
TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
CITY OF HERMOSA 11EAcrt
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE: INVC PROJ # ACCOUNI Dt:I;CRIPIION
00240 105-400-2601-4188 00717
04/15/89
STREET LIGHTING:
00240 110-400-3301-4188 00694
04/15/89 VEH PKG DIST
00240 110-400-3302-4188 00914
04/15/89 PARKING ENF
00240 145--400-3401-4188 00656
04/15/89 DIAL A RIDE
00240 145-400-3402-4188 00656
04/15/89 ESEA
00240 155-400-2102-4188 00336
04/15/89 CROSSING GUARD
00240 160-400-3102-4188 00661
04/15/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN
$1.52
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$7.05
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$10.58
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.94
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.38
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$1 76
/EMPLOYEE BENEF115
$3.04
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
VENDOR TUTAL **-11..44**IFrt:xR*kir**********.************************************k****
Ft TRIANGLE HAIDWARE
ELEC SUPP/ST LIGHT[I1G
VENDOR TOTAL ***,: *****u,..**#
R THE*UNION CENTRAL t_IFE
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R THE*UNION CENTRAL 1 1FE
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
tt THLIUNTUN CENTRAL 1 LEE
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
PALL
DATE 04/20
INV/REF PO a CFLI
AMUI1111 IIIJENC LAIL EX,
$234.45
00123 105-400-2601-4309 00470 $183.32
2273 03/20/89 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
x*####*#**x,*####************##********#******NR*#***
INS CO.
INS CO
INS CO.
INS CO
R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO.
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
02355 001-400-1212-4188 01356
04/17/89 EMP BENEFITS
02355 105-400-2601-4188 00716
04/17/89 STREET LIGHTING
02355 110-400-3301-4188 00693
04/17/89 VEH PKG DIST
02355 110-400-3302-4188 00913
04/17/89 PARKING ENF
02355 145-400-3401-4188 00655
04/17/89 DIAL A RIDE
$183.32
$672.26
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$24.68
/EMPLOYEE BENEFI(S
$1.80
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$134 73
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.99
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00029 29dc.
$0 06 04/1:i
00029 290c.
$0 00 04/19
00029 298b
$0.00 04/19
00029 290c.
$0.00 04/19
00029 2986
$0.00 04/19
00029 298
$0.00 04/19
00029 2986
$0 00 04/19
2273 08172 298x.
$0.00 04/20
00028 2986.
$0.00 04/19
00028 2986,
$0.00 04/19
00028 29861
$0.00 04/19.
00028 291-1-1,
$0.00 04/19
00028 2986,
$0.00 04/19
1
F II IANCE--SFA340
TINE 16:45:07
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
I1 THE*UNION (ANTRAL LIFE INS CO.
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
Ft THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO.
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
R THE*UNION CENTRAL. LIFE INS IS CO
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
It THE*UNION CI.NTRAI.. LIFE INS CO.
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
02355 145-400-3402-4188 00655 $0.32
04/17/89 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
02355 145-400-3403-4188 00117 $0.49
04/17/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
02355 155-400-2102-4188 00335 $2.05
04/17/89 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
02355 160-400-3102-4188 00660
$19.20
04/17/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
**, VENDOR TOTAL****************r*********!F*****************************************
R UNITED AMERICAN INSURANCE CO.
CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 89
02697 001-400-1212-4188 01358
04/17/89
PAGE 0
DATE 04/20
INV/REF P0 li CHF,
AMO(N1 UNENC UA TL Ex•
$856.52
$80.00
EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
VENDOR TOTAL ***ir**********************r*************************************t,***
It FRANK P. *UN: UETA
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND (.9907
02711 001-210-0000-2110
04/03/89
$80'. 00
00028 2986
$0 00 04/19
00028 2986
$0 00 04/19
00028 2986
$0.00 04/19
00028 2986
$0.00 04/19
00065
2986
$0.00 04/19
02804 $500.00 69907 08401 2987
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/20
**,. VENDOR TOTAL ***;************i***********************************************:r**
Il VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY COMPANY
HAZ MATERIAL CLEANER 61848
$500.00
01934 001-400-2201-4309 00669 $298.20
04/04/89 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
**it VENDOR TOTAL***-***************************************************************
It VALLEY LODGE
LODGING/B. KL.NDALL
$298.20
02795 001-400-2101-4313 00198 $524.64
04/13/89 POLICE
/TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC
**,. VENDOR TOTAL.***:.************,.*********,F*************************************t,***
It VIK'S CONCRETE PUMPING
CONCRETE PUMPING /2398
$524.64
1961840 08305
498/
$298.20 04/20
08531
2987.
$0.00 04/19.
02751 001--400-3103-4309 00835 $160.00 11651/2398 08144
04/01/89 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $250.00
**,f VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************************#*******
R J. S. *WARD & CO. AS AGENT FOR
REIMB LIAB/MAR 89
$160.00
2987
04/20.
02466 705-400-1209-4201 00091 $6,477.60 08234 2987,
04/10/89 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/20
4
F I I LANCE-SFA340
TIME 16:45:07
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R J. S. *WARD & CO. AS AGENT FOR
REIMB LIAR/MI,R 89
**" VENDOR TOTAL. ***,***i4,
VND >k
DATE INVC
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPIION
PAGE 0.
DATE 04/20
INV/REF PO k CHI,\
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EX,
02466 705-400-1209-4324 00095 $3.123.34
04/10/89 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS
*#***1:,w**##****a********#*#*************#*********,1*#****
• WATCHFOGEL t ONST,M;TION
WORK GUAR REFUND /0567
02770 001,-210-0000-2110
04/03/89
49.600 94
08234
2987
$0.00 04/20
02809 $1.550.00 70567 07196 2987'
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/20.
**, VENDOR TOTAL ***,.***u ir******..********t*****************************************
• WEST PUBLISHING •:UMPANY
PUBLICATIONS
$1.550 00
00141 001-400-1131-4201 00480 4170.79
04/03/89 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
**.: VENDOR TOTAL **„s,***w*,r***********wr,.K*****************#####***********;,*****#
K WESTERN GOVT L RE: EARCH AsSOC.
EMPLOYEE ADS 8260
4170 79
01110 001-400-1203-4201 00459 $51.10
04/18/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
VENDOR TOTAL**,r,.****..*******Ma********:.,********************************a;r*;r****
R SALLY A. *WHITE
SEC SERV/APRIL 4, 89
R SALLY A. *WHITE
SEC SERV/MAR 21, t-19
00140
04/18/89
00140
04/03/89
001-400-4102-4201 00199
PLANNING COMM
001-400-4102-4201 00200
PLANNING COMM
451.10
4340.00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$272.00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
**,. VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
• STEVE*WISNILWSK1
MON EXP/JAN-IiAR 8"
01364 001--400-2101-4316
03/31/89 POLICE
4612. 00
00360 469.99
/TRAINING
**,: VENDOR TOTAL ***,***********K*********,r*****************************************
R MARK *WRIGHI
MEALS/ADV JAIL MGMT
00133 001-400-2101-4312 00924
04/04/89 POLICE
469.99
$43.50
/TRAVEL EXPENSE POST
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 443.50
R XEROX CORPORATION
DIABLO MAINT/JAN-I•IAR 89
04589 2987;
$0.00 04/19
8260 08236 298/
40.00 04/19
06093 2987t
40.00 04/19
06092 2987,
40.00 04/20.
08554
298/'
40.00 04/20
08558 29881
$0.00 04/20/ 1
00135 001-400-1206-4201 00528 4525.00 00045 2988,
04/01/89 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/20
•
FINANCE—SFA.140
TIME: 16:45:07
PA1• VENDOR NAME-
DESCRIPTION
XEROX CORPORATION
EXCESS METER USE/MAR 89 10331
XEROX CORPORATION
LEASE PMT/APR 89 60120
11 XEROX CORPORATION
LEASE PMT/APR 89 59597
It XEROX CORPORATION
LEASE PMT/APR 89 60117
II XEROX CORPORATION
LEASE PMT/APR 89 60118
XEROX CORPORATION
LEASE PMT/APR 89 60117
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 04/25/89
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN #
DATE INVC
AMOUNT
PROJ # ACCOUNI DLtiCRIPTION
PAt.E cit.
DATE 04:..0/-
INV/REF PO # LtI1'
AMOUNT UNENC LAIL Like
00135 001-400-1208-4201 00537 313.43 020410331 0/3/7
04/10/89 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00
00135 001-400-1208-6900 00151 4321.08
04/01/89 GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS
00135
04/01/89
00135
04/01/89
001-400-1208-6900 00152
GEN APPROP
001-400-2401--6900 00034
ANIMAL CONTROL
521760120 00049
#0.00
3943.72 521759597 00048
/LEASE PAYMENTS 30.00
356.15 X2176011/ 00051
/LEASE PAYMENTS 40.00
00135 001-400-4601-6900 00035 3189.21
04/01/89 COMM RESOURCES /LEASE PAYMENTS
00135 110-400-3302-6900 00117
04/01/89 PARKING ENF
521760118 00052
40.00
4114.00 52176011/ 00051
/LEASE PAYMENTS 40.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL********5****************************************************1******
*** PAY CODL TOTAL**********at************************************************tt,** *x
*** TOTAL WARRANTS******************************************************************
32. 162.59
4279, 174. 16
3888, 090. 61
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE OfMANDS
THE,WARRANTS LISTED ON PA":SITO
WARRANT'RECICTER FCR_
AND FUN' s r AVA;LA.;t C FC•I: c.".77..:: f 1
2vtld 1
04/20/.
2Ytiti1
04/20/.
2id131
04/20/.
� 1E1831
04/20/.
29881
04/20/
d itld I
04/20/
OR CLAIMS COVERS
NCLUSIVE OF 1
__ARE ACCUI
H. REOF:
BY
FINANCE A d NISI RATOIP
084TE
April 19, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the City Council of April 25, 1989
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS
MARCH 1989
Attached are the financial reports for March 1989. After adjust-
ing the revenue for one-time receipts (sale of Seaview Property
and settlement of Quanta) and assumption of property tax collec-
tions, General Fund revenue is 74% received for 75% of the year.
Early revenue projections for the end of this year prepared by
departments for the 1989-90 budget indicate that overall revenue
will be essentially on target.
General Fund expenditures are 69.3% expended for 75% of the year,
which incrementally would suggest savings by the end of the year
of over $600,000. Preliminary department estimates for budget
purposes suggest, however, that we may be under budget by
$300,000. As the 1989-90 budget is compiled, a more precise es-
timate of any savings will be available.
Concur:
evin B. Nor thcraft Viki Cope and
Finance Administrator
City Manager
Attachments
VC/sl
ftet
0
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 11:34: 14
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
001 GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ---
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) . PAGE 0001
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE UNREALIZED
BALANCE ;(
3100 TAXES
3101 /CURRENT YEAR SECURED 2, 325, 087. 00
3102 /CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED 167, 136. 00 13, 082. 67 1, 356. 927. 23 968, 159. 77 58. 3
169, 518. T8
3103 /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS
3106 /SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL 58813 150, 000. 00 13, 151. 66 197. 812.8 81 47, 8112. 81- 131. 60, 000. 00 2, 119. 23
3107 /TRANSFER TAX 55, 220. 36 4, 779. 64 92. 0
3108 122, 940. 00 16, 590. 72 92, 460. 79 30, 479. 21 75. 2
3110 /CABLE TV FRANCHISE
/SALES TAX 1, 673, 628. 00 133, 840. 22 1, 285, 356. 69
96, 138. 00 O. 00 - - 00 388, 271. 31 76. 8
74, 678
3111 /ELECTRIC FRANCHISE 34, 530. 00 21, 460. 00 77. 6
3112 /GAS FRANCHISE 0. 00 0. 00 34, 580. 00 0. 0
/REFUSE FRANCHISE
3113 34, 000. 00 0. 00 O. 00 34, 000. 00 0. p
107, 000. 00 12. 089. 80 90, 798. 48
3114 /TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY 168, 394. 00 16. 201. 52 84. 8
_ 3115 /BUSINESS LICENSE 156. 90 123, 550. 05 44, 843. 95 73. 3
r /UTILITY USER TAX
3120 475, 000. 00 21, 259. 00 289, 910. 88 185. 089. 12 61.0 -
00 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 0. 00 0. pp 0 0
5. 413, 903. 00 212. 290. 20 9 3, 736.234. 07 1. 677. 668. 93 69. 0
3200 LICENSES AND PERMITS
3202 /DOG LICENSES 14.000.00
3203 /BICYCLE LICENSES751. 00 13, 696. 25 303. 75 97. 8
/BUILDING PERMITS
3204 100.00 9.00 33.00 67.00 33.0
3205 /ELECTRIC PERMITS __ 173, 000. 00 15, 552. 06 144, 266. 29 28. 733. 71 83. 3 3206 /PLUMBING PERMITS 38, 000. 00 3, 042. 00 27, 645. 00 10. 355. 00 72. 7
/OCCUPANCY PERMITS
3207 30, 000. 00 1. 872. 00 21, 869. 00 8, 131. 00 72, 8 3209 /GARAGE SALES 6, 000. 00 625. 00 4, 110. 00 1, 890. 00 68. 5
3210 /DINGO PERMITS65. 00 10. 00 46. 00 19. 00 70. 7
3211 /BANNER PERMITS 200. 00 0. 00 50. 00 150. 00 25. 0
/ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS
3212 1, 800. 00 - 300. 00 1. 744. 79 55. 21 96. 9
150.00 70.00 170:00
3213 /ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE 20.00- .113. 3
3214 /AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT 3, 500. 00 500. 00 3. 020. 00 480. 00 86. 2
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 155. 00 30. 00 170. 00 15. 00- 109. b
266. 970. 00 22, 761. 06 216, 820. 33 50, 149. 67 81. 2
3300 FINES & FORFEITURES
3301 /VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS 100, 000. 00 9, 577. 56 100, 294. 32
3303 /COURT FINES/POLICE DEPT 35, 000. 00 2, 960. 06 33. 298. 48 1.701.52 1
OBJECT SUBTOTAL95. 1
135, 000. 00
12, 537. 62 133, 592. 80 1, 407. 20 98. 9
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 127, 000. 00
3402 /RENTS & CONCESSIONS2B, 530. 50 `" `-" 66, 042. 10 60, 957. 90 52.0
/PIER REVENUE
3403 1, 500. UO 131. 36 1, 076. 97 423. 03 71.7 I
9, 960. 00 534. 60 8, 327. 60
3404 /COMM CTR LEASES 68, 000. 00 1, 632. 40 83. 6
3405 /COMM CTR RENTALS 8, 321. 00 58. 036. 50 9, 963. 50 85. 3
/COMM CTR THEATRE
3406 50, 000. 00 5. 260. 50 37. 013. 44 12, 986. 56 74. 0
14, 000. 00 2, 166. 00 12, 493. 63
1.506.37 89.2
•
4
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 11:34: 14
CITY OF HERMOSA PEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE
001 GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3411 /OTHER FACILITIES 50, 000. 00 10. 384. 00 49, 388. 50
3412 /TENNIS COURTS 12, 500. 00 1. 233. 75 8, 187. 20
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 332, 960. 00 499. 29- 240, 565. 94
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE
3504
3505
3507
3508
3509
3510
3511
3514
3515
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
/IN LIEU OFF HIGHWAY
/IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE
/HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE
/MANDATED COSTS
/HOMEOWNER PROP TX RELIE
/POST
/STC -SVC OFF TRAINING
/CIGARETTE TAX
/SUPPLEMENTAL SUBVENTION
350. 00
636. 204. 00
4, 000. 00
0. 00
64. 000. 00
17, 500. 00
8. 500. 00
52. 000. 00
12. 627. 00
795, 181.00
3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY
3603 /RECYCLING FEASIBILITY 5,000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 000. 00
3800 CURRENT
3801
3802
3803
3806
3808
3809
3810
3811
3812
3813
3814
3815
3816
3817
3818
3819
3820
3821
3823
3824
3825
SERVICE CHARGES
/RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION
/SIGN REVIEW
/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
/BOARD OF APPEALS
/ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW
/TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW
/FINAL MAP REVIEW
/ZONE CHANGE REVIEW
/CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW
/PLAN CHECK FEES
/PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL
/PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES
/CURB/SIDEWALK REPAIR
/SPECIAL CURB MARKING
/POLICE SERVICES
/JAIL SERVICES
/TRUSTY ADMIN FEE
/FINGERPRINT SERVICE
/SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY
/VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES
/PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING
15, 000. 00
700. 00
8, 452. 00
375. 00
2, 980. 00
5. 400. 00
1, 875. 00
1, 800. 00
23, 040. 00
127, 000. 00
3. 465. 00
6. 000. 00
0. 00
300. 00
15, 000. 00
7. 735. 00
2, 775. 00
3. 000. 00
20, 000. 00
3. 000. 00
100. 00
0. 00
59. 555. 72
0. 00
1, 211.00
0. 00
3. 300. 14
0. 00
2. 546. 12
0. 00
66. 612. 98
0. 00
0. 00
1, 440. 00
200. 00
230. 00
0. 00
320. 00
450. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 440. 00
8, 518. 00
533. 00
270. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1. 338. 00
935. 00
170. 00
214. 50
0. 00
138. 00
20. 00
336. 37
503. 174. 43
1. 594. 19
1. 211. 00
32, 742. 11
15, 943. 13
1, 945. 38
36, 492. 50
12, 627. 13
606, 066. 24
5, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
12, 800. 00
830. 00
5. 840. 00
75. 00
2, 560. 00
4. 282. 20
1. 625. 00
1, 800. 00
20, 615. 00
107, 208. 31
2, 132. 00
4, 864. 35
0. 00
0. 00
11, 214. 50
7. 310. 00
2, 645. 00
1, 626. 50
9. 350. 00
1, 290. 00
90. 00'
PAGE 0002
DATE 04/19/89
75. 0% OF YEAR COMPLE.TE
UNREALIZED
BALANCE X
611. 50
4, 312. 80
92. 394. 06
13. 63
133. 029. 57
2. 405. 81
1. 211. 00-
31. 257. 89
1. 556. 87
6, 554. 62
15, 507. 50
0. 13-
189. 114. 76
98. 7
65. 4
72. 2
96. 1
79. 0
39. 8
0. 0
51. 1
91. 1
22. 8
70. 1
100. 0
76. 2
0. 00 100. 0
0. 00 100. 0
2, 200. 00
130. 00-
2, 612. 00
300. 00
320. 00
1, 117. 60
250. 00
0. 00
2, 425. 00
19, 791.69
1. 333. 00
1, 135. 65
0. 00
300. 00
3. 785. 50
425. 00
130. 00
1. 373. 50
10. 650. 00
1.710.00
10. 00
85. 3
118. 5
69. 0
20. 0
88. 8
79. 3
86. 6
100. 0
89. 4
84. 4
61. 5
81. 0
0. 0
0. 0
74. 7
94. 5
95. 3
54. 2
46. 7
43. 0
90. 0
to
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
u
1
•
w
--
9
0
V
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 11:34: 14
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
001 GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0003 •
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED 1
EST REV MONTHLY REVYEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7. .
•
3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES
3827 /LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT 6. 060. 00 0. 00 6, 060. 00 0. 00 100. 0
3831 /STREET CUT INSPECTION 15. 000. 00 600. 00 10, 765. 00 4. 235. 00 71.7 •
3834 /ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 7, 500. 00 1. 171. 00 7, 513. 00 13. 00- 100. 1
3836 /FUMIGATION INSPECT FEE 7. 500.'00 535. 80 6, 007. 70 1. 492. 30 80. 1
3837 /RETURNED CHECK CHARGE 800.00 322.40 627.80 172.20 78.4 •
3838 ' /SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIO 1. 500. 00 138. 20 1.932. 60 432. 60- 128. 8
3839 /PHOTOCOPY CHARGES 600.00 176.40.. 689.34 89.34- 114.8
3840 /AMBULANCE TRANSPORT 8. 000. 00 925. 00 7, 271. 00 729. 00 90.8 •
3841 /POLICE TOWING 33, 000. 00 1, 540. 00 19, 163. 70 13. 836. 30 58.0
3856 /GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1,350.00 0.00 1,350.00 0. 00 100.0
3857 /PKG PLAN APPLICATION 960.00 0.00 640.00 320.00 66.6 40
3858 /TENANT REFUSE BILLING 200.00 40.00 170.00 30.00 85.0
3859 /REFUSE LIEN FEE 500.00 0.00 324.76- 824.76 64.9
3860 /BOOTING RELEASE FEE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0
3861 /HAZARDOUS MAT PERMIT 2, 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 500. 00 0. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 333, 367. 00 21. 665. 30 260, 023. 24 73. 343. 76 77. 9
•
3900 OTHER REVENUE0
3901 /SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 397. 186. 00 0. 00 396, 814. 07 371.93 99.9
3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREY YR 43. 000. 00 3. 050. 15 67, 958. 99 24. 958. 99- 158. 0
3903 /CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT 3, 000, 00 2, 083. 25 2. 783. 25 216. 75 92. 7
3904 /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 1, 500.'00 125, 053. 99 126, 488. 53 124, 988. 53- 8432. 5
3907 /FOUNDATION CONTRIBUTION 25, 000. 00 0. 00 25, 000. 00 0. 00 100.0
3913 /CITY OFFICES RECYCLING 100.00 26. 10 170. 70 70. 70- 170. 7
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN -- 1.731. 421. 00 • 142, 109. 00 -.-- 1, 305, 092. 00 426, 329. 00 75. 3
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 201, 207. 00 272, 322. 49 r 1. 924, 307. 54 276. 899. 46 87. 4 •
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 9, 483. 588. 00 607. 690. 36 7. 122, 610. 16 2. 360, 977. 84 75. 1
•
FUND TOTAL
9. 483. 588. 00 607, 690. 36 7. 122. 610. 16 2. 360. 977. 84 75. 1 ! •
•
•
•
[•.-
•
2
4
1
1
1
1
1
t
1
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 11:34:14
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3101
3103
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
/CURRENT YEAR SECURED
/PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3955
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DEPT 0000
FUND TOTAL
/OPERATING TRANSFERS IN
TOTALS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
EST REV
357. 882. 00
27. 000. 00
384. 882. 00
82, 000. 00
82. 000. 00
3. 309. 00
3. 309. 00
470, 191. 00
MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
14. 539. 99
14. 539. 99
0. 00
0.00
14, 539. 99
470, 191. 00 14. 539. 99
224. 400. 68
14, 797. 68
239, 198. 36
61, 848. 66
61.848.66
3. 309. 00
3, 309. 00
304. 356. 02
304. 356. 02
•
•
PAGE 0004
DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED •
BALANCE
133. 481. 32
12. 202. 32
145. 683. 64
20, 151. 34
20, 151.34
62. 7
54. 8
62. 1
75. 4
75.4
0. 00 100. 0
0. 00 100. 0
165, 834. 98 64. 7
165.834.98 64.7
1:.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1•.
•
•
1•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 11:34:14
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
110 PARKING FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3300 FINES & FORFEITURES
3302 /COURT FINES/PARKING
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401
3407
3409
3413
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
3800 CURRENT
3842
3843
3844
3845
3846
3847
3848
3849
3850
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
/INTEREST INCOME
/PARKING LOT RENTAL
/LOT B
/VPD LEASE
SERVICE CHARGES
/PARKING METERS
/PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL
/DAILY PARKING PERMITS
/VPD LOT PERMITS/DAILY
/VPD LOT PERMITS/MONTHLY
/VALIDATION STAMPS
/DRIVEWAY PERMITS
/GUEST PERMITS
/CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3902
3904
3955
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DEPT 0000
FUND TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - _--`
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
/REFUNDS/REIMB PREY YR
/GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS
/BUDGETED TRANSFERS IN
TOTALS
EST REV
1.375, 000. 00
1, 375. 000. 00
33. 000. 00
15. 000. 00
22. 000. 00
65, 000. 00
135, 000. 00
580, 000. 00
185. 000. 00
2.500.00
7. 000.100
10. 000. 00
15, 000. 00
250. 00
1. 000. 00
2, 000. 00
802. 750. 00
50. 00
50. 00
12, 249. 00
12. 349. 00
2, 325, 099. 00
2, 325, 099. 00
MONTHLY REV
YEAR TO DATE
195. 748. 00 1. 046. 855. 62
195, 748. 00 1. 046, 855. 62
506. 53 17, 089.86
1.392.25__ 18.130.25
1. 915. 84 - -- ` 15, 326. 72
9. 914. 12 57. 938. 60
13, 728. 74 108, 485. 43
59. 253. 74
84. 118. 00
0.00
1. 395. 87
2, 263. 20
3, 870. 05
146. 50
61.00
20. 00
151, 128. 36
66. 10
0. 00
66. 10
468. 774. 63
125, 553. 00
995. 00
5. 516. 48
8, 053. 80
15. 259. 44
461. 00
685. 00
1, 790. 00
627. 088. 35
8. 54
41. 00
12, 249. 00
12, 298. 54
360, 671. 20 1. 794. 727. 94
360, 671. 20 1, 794. 727. 94
PAGE 0005
DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
BALANCE
328, 144. 38 76. 1
328.144.38 76. 1
15. 910. 14
3. 130. 25-
6. 673. 28
7. 061. 40
26, 514. 57
111, 225. 37
59. 447. 00
1. 505. 00
1. 483. 52
1. 946. 20
259. 44-
211. 00-
315. 00
210. 00
175. 661. 65
41.46
9. 00
0. 00
50. 46
51. 7
120. 8
69. 6
89. 1
80. 3
80. 8
67. 8
39. 8
78. 8
80. 5
101. 7
184. 4
68. 5
89. 5
78. 1
17. 0
82. 0
100. 0
99. 5
530, 371. 06 77. 1
530.371.06 77. 1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1.
•
A
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-FA484 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -- -
-
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT(BY FUND) PAGE 0006
TIME 11:34:14 FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE UNREALIZED
BALANCE
115 STATE GAS TAX FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401
OBJECT SUBTOTAL /INTEREST INCOME 25, 000. 00 4, 190. 69 18, 528. 31 6, 471. 69 74. 1
25, 000. 00 4, 190. 69 18, 528. 31 6. 471. 69 74. 1
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE
3501
3502 /SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION 83, 593. 00 14, 482. 08 65. 496. 62 18, 096. 38 78. 3 3503 /SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 174, 848. 00 _ 31, 783. 32 137, 606. 36 _37, 241. 64 78. 7 3522 /SECT 2107. 5 ALLOCATION 4, 000. 00 0. 00 4, 000. 00
/TDA ARTICLE 3 (58821) 5. 196.00 0.00 5. 196.00 0.00 100. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 267, 637. 00 46, 265. 40 212, 298. 98 55, 338. 02 179. 3
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 101,829.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 101, 829. 00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 394, 466. 00
FUND TOTAL 394, 466. 90
4, 961.00
4. 961. 00
86, 945. 00
86, 945. 00
55, 417. 09 317, 772. 29
55, 417. 09 317, 772. 29
14, 884. 00
14, 884. 00
85.3 _
85. 3
76, 693. 71 80. 5
76. 693. 71 80. 5
•
•
.•
1
L.
•
•
•
•
0
0
0
•
•
•
�•
•
1
1•
•
•
9
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 11:34:14
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0007
FROM 03/01/89 'TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 2.000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2.000.00
3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY
3601 /COUNTY AID TO CITIES 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 2.000.,00
FUND TOTAL 2.000.00
405. 49
405. 49
1. 770. 45
1, 770. 45
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
405.49 1,770.45
405. 49
1. 770. 45
229. 55 88. 5
229. 55 88. 5
0. 00 0. 0
0. 00 0. 0
229. 55 88. 5
229. 55 88. 5
3
0
1
1
1
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
___ _ - __
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0008
TIME 11:34:14 FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3116 /PARK REC FACILITY TAX 70,000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 70.000.00
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 33.000.00
3416 /OIL ROYALTIES 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 33,000.00
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3910 /PARK/RECREATION IN LIEU 175,000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 175, 000. 00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 278, 000. 00
FUND TOTAL 278,000.00
0. 00 37, 102. 00
0. 00 37, 102. 00
6, 786. 81 26, 368. 28
0. 00 0. 00
6. 786. 81 26, 368. 28
39. 204. 00 153. 549. 00
39, 204. 00 153. 549. 00
45. 990. 81 217, 019. 28
45. 990. 81 217, 019. 28
32.898.00 53.0
32.898.00 53.0
6, 631. 72 79. 9
0. 00 0. 0
6, 631. 72 79. 9
21, 451. 00 87. 7
21, 451. 00 87. 7
60.980.72 78.0
60.980.72 78.0
-,
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
J
•
•
•
•
•t
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0009
TIME 11:34:14 FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
126 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3120 /UTILITY USER TAX 777.627.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 777.627.'00
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 26.000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 26, 000. 00
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3903 /CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT 0.00
3956 /RESDL EQUITY TRSFR IN 481,459.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 481, 459. 00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1. 285, 086. 00
FUND TOTAL 1. 285. 086. 00
70. 325. 45
70. 325. 45
13. 396. 29
13. 396. 29
200. 00
0. 00
200. 00
590. 276. 42
590. 276. 42
29, 062. 79
29, 062. 79
200. 00
481, 459. 00
481. 659. 00
83, 921. 74 1. 100, 998. 21
83, 921. 74 1. 100, 998. 21
187, 350. 58
187. 350. 58
3. 062. 79-
3, 062. 79-
200. 00-
0. 00
200. 00-
75. 9
75. 9
111. 7
111. 7
0. 0
100. 0
100. 0
184. 087. 79 85. 6
184.087.79 85.6
•
i
•
•
ea
../
.J'
Al
FINANCE—FA484
TIME 11:34:14
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
127 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ---
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
EST REV
3100 TAXES
3120 /UTILITY USER TAX 1,166,440.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1. 166.440.00
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 3,000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3.000.00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1.169.440.00
FUND TOTAL 1, 169, 440. 00
.. ,..air,..
PAGE 0010
DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
105, 488. 18
105. 488. 18
994. 62
994. 62
885, 406.31
885. 406. 31
2,749.60
2.749.60
106. 482. 80 888, 155. 91
106. 482. 80 888. 155. 91
281,033.69 75.9
281.033.69 75.9
250. 40 91. 6
250. 40 91. 6
281.284.09 75.9
281, 284.09 75.9
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
1 •
0
111
FINANCE-FA494
TIME 11:34:14
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
130 REVENUE SHARING FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DEPT 0000 TOTALS
FUND TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89. TO 03/31/89
EST REV
1. 200. 00
1, 200. 00
1, 200. 00
1, 200. 00
MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE
67.49 y
67. 49
67. 49
67. 49
756. 61
756. 61
756. 61
756. 61
PAGE 0011
DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
BALANCE
443. 39
443. 39
63. 0
63. 0
443. 39 63. 0
443. 39 63. 0
•
0
•
•
s
•
•
0
•
•
J
1
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE
TIME 11:34:14 FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 9019 •
DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE UNREAL IZED
•
V 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000 ,0
0
1
1
3100 TAXES
3117 /PROPOSITION A TRANSIT
3121 SUBREGNL INCENTIVE FUNDS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
189, 587. 00
36, 422. 00
226, 009. ,00
20, 790. 00
0. 00
20, 790. 00
154, 280. 87
42, 870. 00
197, 150. 87
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 . /INTEREST INCOME 16, 000. 00 3. 168. 10 12, 622. 26
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 16, 000. 00 3, 168. 10 12, 622. 26
35, 306. 13
6, 448. 00-
28, 858. 13
3,377.74
3,377.74
81.3
117. 7
87. 2
78. 8
78. 8
3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES
3852
0. 00 0. 0
3854 /FARES, ESEA 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3855 /FARES, DIAL A RIDE 8, 050. 00 0. 00 5, 012. 74 3, 037. 26 62. 2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /BUS PASSES 3, 500. 00 798. 00 4, 807. 00 1. 307. 00- 137. 3 11, 550. 00 798. 00 9, 819. 74 1. 730. 26 85. 0 _
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3953 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DEPT 0000
1 FUND TOTAL
r
1, 106. 00
1. 106. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 106. 00
1, 106. 00
0. 00 100. 0
0.00 100.0
TOTALS 254, 665. 00 24. 756. 10 220, 698. 87 33, 966. 13 86. 6
254, 665. 00
24, 756. 10 220, 698. 87
33, 966. 13 86. 6
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
_-t
•
e
•
•
i
•
•
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 11:34: 14
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
150 GRANT FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0013
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 2, 000. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2.000.00
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE
3526 /19-378 CLARK STADIUM 0.00
3527 /14-857 COMMUNITY CENTER 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00
3700 INTERGOVERNMENT/FEDERAL
3701 /FEDERAL AID URBAN 433, 200. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 433, 200. 00
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 81.600.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 81, 600. 00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 516, 800. 00
FUND TOTAL 516.800.00
924. 33
924. 33
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
6, 801. 00
6, 801.00
7, 725. 33
7, 725. 33
2,479. 61
2,479.61
1. 932. 30
910. 00
2, 842. 30
0. 00
0. 00
61, 203. 00
61, 203. 00
66, 524. 91
66. 524. 91
479.61- 123.9
479.61- 123.9
1, 932. 30- 0. 0
910. 00- 0. 0
2, 842. 30- 0. 0
433, 200. 00 0. 0
433.200.00 0.0
20, 397. 00 75. 0
20, 397. 00 75. 0
450. 275. 09 12. 8
450, 275. 09 12. 8
1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
J
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0014
TIME 11:34:14 FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
155 CROSSING GUARD FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3100 TAXES
3101
3103
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
/CURRENT YEAR SECURED
/PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
73. 495. 00
5. 196. 00
78. 691. 00
800. 00
800. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
378. 31
378. 31
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 452.00 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 452.00 0.00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 79.943.00 378.31
FUND TOTAL 79.943. 00
44. 478. 22
2. 143. 61
46. 621. 83
1. 044. 09
1. 044. 09
452. 00
452. 00
40. 117. 92
378. 31 48, 117. 92
29, 016. 78
3. 052. 39
32. 069. 17
244. 09-
244. 09-
60. 5
41. 2
59. 2
130. 5
130. 5
0. 00 100. 0
0. 00 100. 0
31, 825. 08 60. 1
31. 825. 08 60. 1
•)
FINANCE-FA484
TIME 11:34:14
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION
160 SEWER FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0015
FROM 03/01/89. TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/69
75.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7.
3400 USE OF MONEY S. PROPERTY
3401 / INTEREST INCOME 82, 000. 00 15, 970. 13 51, 452. 87 30, 547. 13 62. 7
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 82, 000. 00 15. 970. 13 51, 452. 87 30, 547. 13 62. 7
3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY
3602 /BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANC 3, 600. 00 2, 465. 68 3, 397. 45 202. 55 94. 3
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3, 600. 00 2. 465. 68 3, 397. 45 202. 55 94. 3
3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES
3828 /SEWER CONNECTION FEE 25, 000. 00 3,236.24 15, 408. 86 9, 591. 14 61. 6
3829 /SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 1, 000. 00 70. 00 855. 00 145. 00 85. 5
3832 /SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN 2. 400. 00 213. 58 1, 598. 09 801. 91 66. 5
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 28, 400. 00 3, 519. 82 17. 861. 95 10. 538. 05 62. 8
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3906 /IN LIEU SEWER FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 803.481.00 66:666.00 614.619.45 188, 861. 55 76. 4
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 803, 481. 00 66, 666. 00 614, 619. 45 188, 861. 55 76. 4
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 917, 481. 00 88, 621. 63 687, 331. 72 230, 149. 28 74.9
FUND TOTAL
0
917, 481. 00 88, 621.63 687, 331. 72
230, 149. 28 74. 9
r
e
•
•
4111
•
r
d
s
•
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -- --1
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0016 •
TIME 11:34:14 FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89 ,
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION UNREALIZED •
EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3300 FINES & FORFEITURES
3304 /FORFEITED FUNDS 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 20,000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 20.000.00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 20.000.00
FUND TOTAL
20, 000. 00
6. 140. 77
6. 140. 77
2, 354. 52
2, 354. 52 _ _
8. 495. 29
8. 495. 29
6, 142. 77
6, 142.177
14, 371. 69
14. 371. 69
20, 514. 46
20, 514. 46
6, 142. 77- 0. 0
6. 142. 77- 0. 0
5. 628. 31 71. 8
5, 628. 31 71. 8
514. 46- 102. 5
514. 46- 102. 5
1 •i
--1
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
1
0
1 •
•
1 •
•
•
•
4
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0017
TIME 11:34:14 FROM 03/01/89. TO 03/31/89 ' DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 6,000.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6.000.00
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3912 /FIRE FLOW FEE 124. 000.00
3955 . /OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 59,700.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 183.700.00
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 189.700.00
FUND TOTAL 189,700.00
2, 096. 82 5, 797. 01
2. 096. 82 5, 797. 01
12, 471. 00 121, 836. 59
4, 167. 00 47, 199. 00
16. 638. 00 169, 035. 59
18. 734. 82 174. 832. 60
18. 734. 82 174. 832. 60
202. 99 96. 6
202. 99 96. 6
2, 163. 41 98. 2
12, 501. 00 79. 0
14, 664.41 92. 0
14, 867. 40 92. 1
14, 867. 40 92. 1
•
r
V
A
1
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0018
TIME 11:34:14 FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
UNREALIZED
FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE
• 705 INSURANCE FUND
•
•
1
1
1
1
1
r --
N
1
1
1
DEPARTMENT 0000
3400.USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
3401 /INTEREST INCOME 55, 000.00 8.120.74 38, 733.78 16, 266.22 70.4
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 55.000.00 8.120.74 38.733. 78 16.266.22 70.4
3900 OTHER REVENUE
3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 0.00 7.440.00 7.440.00 7.440.00- 0.0
3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 195,597.00 16. 157.00 147. 125.00 48.472.00 75.2
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 195.597.00 23.597.00 9 154.565.00 41,032.00 79.0
DEPT 0000 TOTALS 250, 597. 00 31, 717. 74 193, 298. 78 57. 298. 22 77. 1
FUND TOTAL
REPORT TOTALS
250.597.00 31.717.74 193.298.78 57.298.22 77. 1
17. 638. 256. 00 1. 455. 616. 19 13. 159. 486. 13 4. 478, 769. 87 74. 6
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
:JOB JOB484, BATCH. FINANCE. PUB
PRIORITY = DS; INPRI = 8; TIME = UNLIMITED SECONDS
JOB NUMBER = #J258
WED. APR 19, 1989. 8:34 AM
HP3000 / MPE V G. A2. 04 (BASE G. A2. 04) .
:COMMENT
:COMMENT PRINT REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT
:COMMENT
:PURGE TEMP484
:FILE OSLIST=TEMP484. NEW; REC=-32, 8, F, ASCII; NOCCTL; SAVE; &
: DEV=DISC; D I SC=250000. 32. 1
:0
HP32216C.00.08 QUERY/3000 WED, APR 19, 1989, 8:34 AM
COPYRIGHT HEWLETT-PACKARD CO. 1976
B=YTDDB
PASSWORD =
MODE = 5
S=YTD-DETAIL
FIND GEN-LED=300,301 AND &
DATE ID 880701 . 890331
11102 ENTRIES QUALIFIED
OUTPUT=LP;LINES=O;NOPAGE
REPORT; LINES=0; NOPAGE
D1, ACCOUNT-#. 14
Di. AMOUNT. 26
DI, DATE. 32
Si. OBJECT
S2. DEPT
83. FUND
END
EXIT
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
r
r
1
_~
•
END OF PROGRAM
!� : RUN FA484. PUB
II �
9
i
1
1
1
1
rd
END OF PROGRAM
:COMMENT PURGE TEMP484
:EOJ
CPU SEC. = 2219. ELAPSED MIN. = 182. WED. APR 19. 1989. 11:36 AM
•
•
•
•
•
•
1 •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
•
s.
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
0000
1401 GASOLINE INVENTORY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
1101 CITY COUNCIL
DEPT:
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0001
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND, ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
APPROPRIATION
0.00
O. 00
0.00
0.00
DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4319 SPECIAL EVENTS
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
20. 731. 00
518. 00
818. 00
17, 700. 00
39, 767. 00
22, 500. 00
22, 500. 00
600. 00
9. 500. 00
4. 559. 00
5, 000. 00
1. 000. 00
1. 590. 00-
19, 069. 00
2, 500. 00
2, 500. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1, 909. 50
0. 00
102. 60
1, 200. 00
3. 212. 10
0.00
0.00
20. 83
642. 28
0. 00
282. 00
84. 39
0. 00
1, 029. 50
0.00
0.00
83.836.00 4.241.60
1102 BILTMORE COMM DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
370. 00 136. 50
370. 00 136. 50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
15. 939. 43
0. 00
1,618.47
10, 881. 50
28, 439. 40
24, 218. 76
24, 218. 76
115. 52
6, 462. 65
4. 795. 00
2, 041. 79
356. 09
0. 00
13. 771. 05
2, 500. 00
2, 500. 00
68, 929. 21
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
136. 50 0. 00
136. 50 0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4, 791. 57
518. 00
800. 47-
6, 818. 50
11, 327. 60
1,718.76-
1.718.76-
484.
,718.76-
1.718.76-
484. 48
3, 037. 35
236. 00-
2, 958. 21
643. 91
1, 590. 00-
5, 297. 95
0. 0
0.0
0.0
0. 0
76. 8
0. 0
'197. 8
61. 4
71. 5
107.6
107. 6
19. 2
68. 0
105. 1
40. 8
35. 6
0. 0
72. 2
0. 00 100. 0
0. 00 100.0
14, 906. 79 82.2
233. 50 36. 8
233. 50 36. 8
a
s
'1
$
0
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08: 30: 30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1102 BILTMORE COMM
CITY OF. HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0002
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0%. OF YEAR COMPLETE
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPNd. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4323 PUBLIC NOTICING
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1, 120. 00
510. 00
1. 630. 00
0. 00
184. 50
184. 50
2, 000. 00 321.00
1121 CITY CLERK DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4323 PUBLIC NOTICING
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN 8500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1122 ELECTIONS
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
29. 388. 00
0. 00
735. 00
735. 00
12. 000. 00
42. 858. 00
2. 009. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1. 000. 00
3. 009. 00
300. 00 0. 00
300. 00 0. 00
440. 00
2, 000.00
220. 00
400. 00
550. 00
8, 000. 00
1, 349. 00-
10. 261. 00
57. 49
92. 45
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
953. 60
0. 00
1. 103. 54
200. 00 0. 00
200. 00 0. 00
53. 619. 00 4. 112. 54
DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
2, 000. 00 0. 00
0. 00
184. 50
184. 50
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
321.00 0. 00
19, 145. 46
59. 22
906. 63
0. 00
11, 000. 00
31. 111.31
100. 00
100. 00
387. 33
1. 404. 10
175. 00
425. 00
115. 00
6. 008. 85
0. 00
8, 515. 28
0. 00
0. 00
39, 726. 59
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
20. 07
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
20. 07
0. 00
0. 00
20. 07
81. 68 0. 00
1. 120. 00
325. 50
1, 445. 50
1, 679. 00
0. 0
36. 1
11.3
16. 0
10, 242. 54 65. 1
59. 22- 0. 0
171. 63- 123. 3
735.00 0.0
1, 000. 00 91. 6
11, 746. 69 72. 5
200. 00 33. 3
200. 00 33. 3
52. 67 88. 0
575. 83 71. 2
45. 00 79. 5
25. 00- 106. 2
435. 00 20. 9
1,991. 15 75. 1
1, 349. 00- 0. 0
1, 725. 65 83. 1
200.00 0.0
200. 00 0. 0
13. 872. 34 74. 1
1. 918. 32 4. 0
14
rl
t
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08: 30: 30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1122 ELECTIONS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4211 CONTRACT SERVICE/PREY YR
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1131 CITY ATTORNEY DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
2, 000.00
10. 900. 00
0. 00
10. 900. 00
100. 00
500. 00
400. 00
200. 00
353. 00-
847. 00
13, 747. 00
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1132 CITY PROSECUTOR
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
138. 487. 00
3, 000. 00
141, 487. 00
2, 400. 00
1. 650. 00
3, 526. 00-
524. 00
142, 011. 00
DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
42Q1 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
25. 440. 00
25. 440. 00
14. 000. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0.00
0. 00
8, 630. 76
8, 630. 76
0. 00
57. 29
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
57. 29
8, 688. 05
11. 242. 96
106. 96
11, 349. 92
242. 32
120. 01
0. 00
362. 33
11. 712. 25
2. 120: 00
2. 120. 00
0. 00
81. 68
913. 53
8, 630. 76
9. 544. 29
0. 00
537. 83
287. 00
0. 00
0. 00
824. 83
10. 450. BO
78. 636. 18
587. 82
79, 224. 00
1,791.30
865. 73
0. 00
2. 657. 03
81. 881.03
19, 080. 00
19, 080. 00
1. 200. 00
PAGE 0003
DATE 04/19/89
75. 07.. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1.918.32
4. 0
9. 986. 47 8. 3
8, 630. 76- 0. 0
1, 355. 71 87. 5
100. 00 0. 0
'37.83- 107.5
113. 00 71. 7
200. 00 0. 0
353. 00- 0. 0
22. 17 97. 3
3, 296. 20 76. 0
59. 850. 82
2, 412. 18
62, 263. 00
56. 7
19. 5
55. 9
608. 70 74. 6
784. 27 52. 4
3. 526. 00- 0. 0
2, 133. 03- 507. 0
60, 129. 97
6, 360. 00
6, 360. 00
12. 800. 00
57. 6
75. 0
75. 0
8. 5
c
•
It •.
r
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 09:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1132 CITY PROSECUTOR
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DEPT:
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
LEGISLATIVE
14, 000. 00
986. 00-
986. 00-
38, 454. 00
1141 CITY TREASURER DEPT: LEGISLATIVE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
1201 CITY MANAGER DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
11. 331.00
1, 000. 00
356. 00
356. 00
9. 000. 00
22, 043. 00
5. 260. 00
5. 260. 00
700. 00
1, 000. 00
110. 00
250. 00
500. 00
716. 00-
1. 844. 00
29. 147. 00
362, 814. 00
MGMT/SUPPORT
95. 525. 00
2, 350. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2, 120. 00
952. 50
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
750. 00
1, 702. 50
0.00
0.00
44. 22
139. 10
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
183. 32
1. 885. 82
33, 081. 26
8. 503. 50
0.00
1, 200. 00
0. 00
0. 00
20, 280. 00
8. 378. 50
118. 56
0. 00
0. 00
6, 750. 00
15, 247. 06
1. 112.90
1.112.90
408. 07
1. 230. 40
40. 00
26. 63
0. 00
0. 00
1. 705. 10
18, 065. 06
239, 653. 69
71, 944. 16
0. 00
PAGE 0004
DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00.
254. 00
254. 00
0. 00
100. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
100. 00
354. 00
374. 07
0.00
0.00
12. 800. 00
986.00-
986.00-
18.
86.00-
986.00-
18. 174. 00
2. 952. 50
881. 44
356. 00
356. 00
2, 250. 00
6, 795. 94
3.893.10
3,893.10
291.93
330. 40-
70. 00
223. 37
500. 00
716. 00-
38. 90
10, 727. 94
122, 786. 24
23, 580. 84
2, 350. 00
8. 5
0.0
0. 0
52. 7
73. 9
• 11.8
0.0
0.0
75. 0
69. 1
25. 9
25. 9
58. 2
133. 0
36. 3
10. 6
0.0
0.0
97. 8
63. 1
66. 1
75. 3
0. 0
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1201 CITY MANAGER
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DEPT:
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
MGMT/SUPPORT
2, 350. 00
3. 640. 00
103, 865. 00
20. 300. 00
20, 300. 00
1. 000. 00
1, 500. 00
350. 00
125. 00
1. 062. 00
3, 322. 00
2. 900. 00
3, 001. 00-
7. 258. 00
7, 621. 00
7, 621.00
139. 044. 00
1202 FINANCE ADMIN DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
174, 062. 00
2. 124. 00
4, 045. 00
4, 045. 00
1, 000. 00
185, 276. 00
64. 280. 00
64. 280. 00
1. 034. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
102. 60
315. 00
8, 921. 10
11. 50
11. 50
56. 28
61. 89
2G. 12
0. 00
0. 00
104. 74
70. 70-
7. 00
172. 33
0. 00
0. 00
9.104.93
14, 425. 64
81. 72
0. 00
137. 06
0., 00
14, 644. 42
2. 876. 38
2. 876. 38
187. 85
1,823.67
2.955.91
76. 723. 74
10. 183. 95
10, 183. 95
409. 51
956. 03
158. 68
4. 00
1, 061. 87
227. 63
1. 822. 03
0. 00
4, 639. 75
7. 620. 66
7. 620. 66
99. 168. 10
128. 119.81
1,946.71
0.00
4,215.21
0.00
134. 281. 73
20. 912. 63
20, 912. 63
1.175.28
PAGE 0005
DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
645. 00
645. 00
0.00
526. 33
684. 09
27, 141.26
10, 116. 05
10, 116. 05
590. 49
543. 97
191. 32
121. 00
0. 13
3. 094. 37
1. 077. 97
3. 001. 00-
2. 618. 25
77. 6
81. 2
73. 8
50. 1
50. 1
40. 9
63. 7
45. 3
3.2
99. 9
6.8
62. 8
0. 0
63. 9
0. 34 99. 9
0. 34 99. 9
39, 875.90 71.3
45. 942. 19 73. 6
177. 29 91. 6
4, 045. 00 0. 0
170. 21- 104. 2
1, 000. 00 0. 0
50, 994. 27 72. 4
42, 722. 37 33. 5
42, 722. 37 33. 5
141.28- 113.6
i
1
•
s,
•,
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1202 FINANCE ADMIN
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN *500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
9, 938. 00
215. 00
2. 702. 00
1. 788. 00
5. 143. 00-
10. 534. 00
500. 00
1, 500. 00
2, 000. 00
262, 090. 00
1203 PERSONNEL DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4320 MEDICAL EXAMS
4397 2.57.. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN *500
36. 780. 00
882. 00
882. 00
3, 640. 00
42, 184. 00
22, 063. 00
12, 800. 00
34, 863. 00
900. 00
4, 000. 00
495. 00
2. 870. 00
1. 500. 00
21. 800. 00
2. 288. 00-
29. 277. 00
760. 00
1. 256. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
829. 94
85. 00
295. 70
0. 00
0. 00
1, 398. 49
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
18, 919.29
3, 597. 00
0.00
644. 16
315. 00
4, 556. 16
3.411.53
3.729.16
7.140.69
272. 81
653. 55
•
0. 00
130. 00
0. 00
1, 291. 30
0. 00
2, 347. 66
7, 392. 84
225. 00
1, 436. 11
745. 00
0. 00
10, 974. 23
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
166. 168. 59
26, 170. 84
0.00
1, 684. 76
2.955. 91
30.811. 51
22. 264. 37
13. 122. 51
35. 386. 88
735. 04
4, 283. 32
568. 00
2, 117. 05
604. 98
10. 385. 30
0. 00
18. 693. 69
114.92 114.92
0. 00 0. 00
PAGE 0006
DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
645. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
578. 29
0. 00
578. 29
0. 00
22. 90
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
22. 90
939. 32
1,076.72
2.545.16 74. 3
10. 00- 104. 6
1. 265. 89 53. 1
1, 043. 00 41. 6
5. 143. 00- 0. 0
440.23- 104. 1
500. 00 0. 0
1.500.00 0.0
2, 000. 00 0. 0
95, 276. 41 '63.6
10. 609. 16 71. 1
882. 00 0. 0
802.76- 191. 0
684. 09 81. 2
11, 372. 49 73. 0
779.66- 103.5
322. 51- 102. 5
1. 102. 17- 103. 1
164.96 81.6
306.22- 107.6
73.00- 114.7
752. 95 73. 7
895. 02 40. 3
11, 414.70 47.6
2, 288. 00- 0. 0
10, 560. 41 63. 9
294.24- 138.7
179.28 85.7
•
r•:1 FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
r •
r
r
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
5400 EQUIPMENT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1205 CABLE TV
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
2. 016. 00
108. 340. 00
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1206 DATA PROCESSING
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
22. 804. 00
0. 00
556. 00
556. 00
1. 820. 00
25. 736. 00
1. 000. 00
1, 000. 00
600. 00
1. 000. 00
510. 00
250. 00
705. 00
781. 00-
2. 284. 00
2, 000.00
2, 000. 00
31. 020. 00
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
71, 091. 00
500. 00
1.720. 00
1, 720. 00
75, 031. 00
93.000. 00 `-
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
114.92
14. 159. 43
1. 898. 40
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
210. 00
2, 108. 40
0. 00
0. 00
28. 10
0. 00
0. 00
59. 00
0. 00
0. 00
87.10
0.00
0. 00
'2.195.50
6, 565. 48
18. 18
0. 00
0. 00
6, 583. 66
114.92
85, 007. 00
17, 449. 16
10. 44
0. 00
73. 83
1. 475. 25
19, 008. 68
5, 000. 00-
5. 000. 00-
495. 64
0. 00
235. 00
282. 00
397. 78
0. 00
1. 410. 42
0. 00
0. 00
15, 419. 10
54, 474. 77
218. 03
0. 00
73. 83
54, 766. 63
2. 961. 52 - 49. 845. 23
PAGE 0007
DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
2. 016. 04
2, 617. 23
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
4, 062. 98
114.96- 105.7
20. 715. 77
5. 354. 84
10. 44-
556. 00
482. 17
344. 75
6, 727. 32
6, 000. 00
6. 000. 00
104. 36
1. 000. 00
275. 00
32. 00-
307. 22
781. 00-
873. 58
2. 000. 00
2. 000. 00
15. 600. 90
16, 616. 23
281. 97
1. 720. 00
1. 646. 17
20, 264. 37
80. 8
76.5
0. 0
O. 0
13. 2
81. 0
73. 8
500. 0
500. 0
82. 6
0. 0
46. 0
112. 8
56. 4
0. 0
61. 7
0. 0
0. 0
49. 7
76. 6
43. 6
0. 0
4. 2
72. 9
39.091. 79 57. 9
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1206 DATA PROCESSING
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN *500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1207 BUS LICENSE DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
93, 000. 00
3.000. 00
10, 000. 00
3,000.00
670. 00
2.000.00
850. 00
5.226. 00-
14, 294. 00
0. 00
14. 330. 00
14, 330. 00
196, 655. 00
MGMT/SUPPORT
78, 809. 00
500. 00
1. 835. 00
1. 835. 00
0.00
82. 979. 00
4, 035. 00
300.00
4, 335. 00
400.00
3. 000. 00
350. 00
400. 00
50. 00
500. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
2.961. 52
268. 95
974. 05
1, 269. 06
80. 00
150. 00
0.00
0.00
2, 742. 06
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
12. 287. 24
3, 818. 27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
3, 818. 27
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
64.64
226. 64
10. 05
0. 00
0. 00
22. 00
49. 845. 23
1,971.22
6.585.58
1,812.17
400. 00
843. 10
495. 50
0.00
12, 107. 57
310. 25
6,499.90
6. 810. 15
123. 529. 58
50. 122. 67
125. 70
9.601. 79
505. 23
3,305.50
63. 660. 89
26. 70
115. 85
142. 55
399. 01
2, 615. 82
134. 06
0. 00
40. 00
121. 00
PAGE 0008
DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
4.062. 98
0. 00
865. 20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
865. 20
0. 00
O. 00 •
0. 00
4.928. 18
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
39, 091.79 57.9
1, 028. 78
2.549.22
1, 187. 83
270.00
1, 156. 90
354. 50
5.226. 00-
1, 321. 23
310. 25-
7, 830. 10
7,519. 85
68. 197. 24
28, 686. 33
374. 30
7.766.79-
1.329.77
.766.79-
1.329.77
3,305.50-
19.318.11
,305.50-
19.318.11
4.008.30
184. 15
4,192.45
0. 99
384. 18
215. 94
400. 00
10. 00
379. 00
65. 7
74. 5
60. 4
59. 7
42. 1
58. 2
0. 0
90. 7
0. 0
45. 3
47.5
65. 3
63. 6
25. 1
523. 2
27. 5
0.0
76. 7
0.6
38. 6
3.2
99. 7
87. 1
38. 3
0.0
80. 0
24. 2
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1207 BUS LICENSE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0009
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
400. 00
2, 475. 00-
2, 625. 00
12. 000. 00
12, 000. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 101. 939.00
1208 GEN APPROP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIA!;.;/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 'LLEPHONE
4:v5 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4397 2.0% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
02-177 SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN *500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS •
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
35, 457. 00
0. 00
1, 022. 00
1, 022. 00
37. 501. 00
29. 599. 00
29, 599. 00
2.572.00
0. 00
2. 075. 00-
497. 00
0. 00
760. 00
3. 877. 00
4, 6.i.'. 00
15. 180. 00
15. 180. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE v.
0. 00
0. 00
323. 33
0. 00
0. 00
4. 141. 60
1, 808. 76
0. 00
0. or
0. 00
1, 808. 76
1.847. 32
1,847.32
0.00
7, 381. '"--
00
0. 00
0. 00
3. 309. 89
0. 00
0. 00
67, 113. 33
15, 'r4. 19
33. 33
0. 00
0. 00
15. 407. 52
17. 109. 17
17. 109. 17
2.571.49
39, 157. 43-
3. 00
7,381.09- 36,585.94-
0.
6,585.94-
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 502. 96
1, 502. 96
87. 414. 00 2, 222. 05-
0. 00
170. 30
0. 00
170. 30
13, 518. 12
13, 5i:3. 12
9, 619. 17
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0, 00
0. 00
u. 00
0.00
• O. 00
0. 00
0. 00
400. 00 0. 0
2. 475. 00- 0. 0
684.89- 126.0
12, 000. 00 0. 0
12, 000. 00 0. 0
34.825 ;,, 65. 8
20, 082. 81
33. 33-
1, 022. 00
1, 022. 00
22, 09'' .d
12. 489. 83
12, 489. 83
0. 51
39, 157. 43
2,075.00-
0.
,075.00-
0. 00 37, 082. 94
0. 00
1, 701. 22
1. 076. 7e
2, 869. 94
0.00
0.00
2.869. 94
0. 00
1, 203. 52-
2, 800. 28
596. 76
1. 661. 88
1,661.88
43. 3
0. 0
0 0
0. 0
41. 0
57. 8
57.8
99. 9
0. n
7361.3
0.0
258. 3
27. 7
65. 5
89. 0
89. 0
74, 924.89 14.2
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
1212 EMP BENEFITS
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DEPT:
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
$ 1213 RETIREMENT DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4180 RETIREMENT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1214 PROSP EXP DEPT:
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4322 UNCLASSIFIED
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
MGMT/SUPPORT
473. 393. 00
473. 393. 00
10, 933. 00-
10, 935. 00-
462,458.00
0-
462,458.00
MGMT/SUPPORT
994, 689. 00
994. 689. 00
23, 534. 00-
23, 534. 00-
971. 155. 00
MGMT/SUPPORT
35. 481. 00
10, 000. 00-
25, 481. 00
25, 481. 00
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4398 RESDL EQUITY TRSFR OUT
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
481. 459. 00
253, 494. 00
734, 953. 00
734. 953. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
48. 785. 93
48, 785. 93
0. 00
0. 00
48. 785. 93
76, 318. 50
76, 318. 50
0. 00
0. 00
76, 318. 50
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.'00
0. 00
18, 457. 00
18, 457. 00
18, 457. 00
336, 006. 73
336, 006. 73
0.00
0.00
336. 006. 73
600. 442. 54
600, 442. 54
0.00
0.00
600, 442. 54
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
481. 459. 00
198. 122. 00
679, 581. 00
679, 581.00
PAGE 0010
DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
• 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
137. 386. 27
137, 386. 27
10. 935. 00-
10, 935. 00-
126.451.27
0-
126.451.27
394, 246. 46
394, 246.46
23, 534. 00-
23, 534. 00-
370,712.46
0-
370,712.46
35, 481.00
10. 000. 00-
25, 481. 00
25, 481. 00
0. 00
55, 372. 00
55, 372. 00
55, 372. 00
70. 9
70. 9
0. 0
0. 0
72. 6
60. 3
60. 3
0.0
0. 0
61.8
0.0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
100. 0
78. 1
92. 4
92. 4
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (2Y FUND) PAGE 0011
TIME 08:30:30 FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
001 GENERAL FUND
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3. 120. 549. 00 202, 147. 37 2. 182, 055. 14 11, 060. 35 927, 433. 51 70. 2
2101 POLICE DEPT: POLICE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 363.729.00 33,774.62 244.451.63 0.00 119.277.37 67.2
4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 1. 440. 939. 00 141, 804. 10 1. 066. 271. 31 0. 00 374, 667. 69 73. 9
4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 18, 480. 00 1, 660. 00 15, 045. 00 0. 00 3, 435. 00 81. 4
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 10, 200. 00 463. 68 4. 179. 24 0. 00 6. 020. 76 40. 9
4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 115, 000. 00 7. 043. 61 63, 093. 40 0. 00 51, 906. 60 54. 8
4109 COURT TIME 20, 500. 00 1. 006. 45 9, 988. 67 0. 00 10, 511. 33 48. 7
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 44. 031. 00 0. 00 9, 223. 43 0. 00 34. 807. 57 20. 9
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 44.031.00 13.266.43 49.439. 10 0.00 5.408. 10- 112.2
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 17. 800. 00 4. 922. 52 23, 096. 53 0. 00 5, 296. 53- 129. 7
4114 POLICE RESERVES 7, 500. 00 443. 00 6, 106. 25 0. 00 1, 393. 75 81. 4
4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 9. 3113. 00 695. 53 5, 053. 92 0. 00 4, 264. 08 54. 2
4118 FIELD TRAINING OFFICER 5, 500. 00 141. 00 2, 826. 70 0. 00 2. 673. 30 51. 3
4187 UNIFORMS 28, 050. 00 2, 284.'11 24, 213. 93 2. 736. 29 1, 099. 78 ' 96. 0
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2. 125, 078. 00 207. 505. 05 1. 522, 989. 11 2. 736. 29 599, 352. 60 71. 7
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4301 DAMAGE SETTLEMENTS
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE
4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST
4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN 3500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN 3500
46, 524. 00
127. 223. 00
173. 747. 00
5, 000. 00
20, 000. 00
26, 500. 00
6. 454. 00
1. 500. 00
6, 000. 00
17, 500. 00
21, 000. 00
17. 500. 00
7. 750. 00
1, 535. 00
5. 800. 00
1, 500. 00
58. 258. 00-
79. 781.00
4, 074. 00
24. 878. 00
460. 00
55. 50
515. 50
24, 422. 69
123, 501. 36
147. 924. 05
0. 00 0. 00
3, 133. 69 18, 222. 59
4, 265. 12 25. 791. 94
979.46 5.329.28
126. 86 1. 011. 58
454. 32 6, 053. 05
1.237.45 12,361.42
2. 497. 01 16, 340. 62
,3. 132 41 13. 007. 17
0. 00 1. 505. 83
100. 00 1. 098. 93
298. 75 6, 304. 06
0. 00 1, 243. 71
0. 00 0. 00
16. 225. 07 108. 270. 18
239. 62
2. 174. 31
1, 587. 92
19, 143. 86
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
477. 28
269. 88
0. 00
510. 68
0. 00
1, 379. 51
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2, 637. 35
0. 00
3. 964. 04
22, 101. 31
3. 721.64
25, 822. 95
5, 000. 00
1,777.41
230. 78
854. 84
488. 42
563. 73-
5, 138. 58
3. 279. 87
4, 492. 83
6, 244. 17
436. 07
504. 06-
256. 29
58. 258. 00-
31. 126. 53-
2. 486. 08
1. 770. 10
52. 4
97. 0
85. 1
0. 0
91. 1
99. 1
86. 7
67. 4
109. 3
70. 6
84. 3
74. 3
19. 4
71. 5
108. 6
82. 9
0. 0
139. 0
38. 9
92. 8
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08: 30: 30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
2101 POLICE
5400 EQUIPMENT
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2201 FIRE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0012
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
DEPT: POLICE
15. 194. 00
44. 146. 00
197, 045. 00
197, 045. 00
2, 619, 797. 00
2. 619, 797. 00
DEPT: FIRE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4108 FLSA OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
32. 512. 00
789. 201. 00
96, 000. 00
55. 000. 00
20. 808. 00
20, 808. 00
11. 100. 00
1, 025, 429. 00
1, 000. 00
31, 302. 00
32. 302. 00
4. 000. 00
2. 000. 00
750. 00
7, 200. 00
3. 600. 00
4. 000. 00
650. 00
3, 000. 00
750. 00
28. 488. 00-
2, 538. 00-
0. 00 7, 691. 94
2.413.93 28.423.72
48. 729. 92 253, 254. 66
48.729.92 253.254.66
275, 389. 47 2. 060, 861. 72
275, 389. 47 2, 060, 861. 72
2, 733. 50
65. 649. 61
9. 085. 22
4. 506. 94
0. 00
0. 00
443. 07
82, 418. 34
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
453. 26
187. 77
0. 00
419. 93
151. 62
47. 21
0. 00
25. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 284. 79
25. 759. 64
568, 805. 85
70, 197. 64
40, 129. 12
2, 278. 87
5, 174. 22
6. 195. 93
718, 541. 27
258. 87
26, 163. 00
26. 421.87
2, 619. 01
2. 616. 84
0. 00
6.217.81
1, 873. 00
1, 632. 53
260. 75
835. 34
411, 28
0. 00
16, 466. 56
0. 00
3. 964. 04
0. 00
0. 00
9, 337. 68
9, 337. 68
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
226. 34
226. 34
. 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
356. 08
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
400. 00
0. 00
0. 00
756. 08
7, 502. 06 50. 6
11, 758. 24 73. 3
56,209.66- 128. 5
56.209.66- 128.5
549, 597. 60 79. 0
549, 597. 60 79. 0
6. 752. 36
220, 395. 15
25, 802. 36
14, 870. 88
18, 529. 13
15, 633. 78
4, 677. 73
306, 661. 39
741. 13
5. 139. 00
5. 880. 13
1, 380. 99
616. 84-
750. 00
626. 11
1, 727. 00
2. 367. 47
389. 25
1, 764. 66
338. 72
28. 488. 00-
19, 760. 64-
79. 2
72. 0
73. 1
72. 9
10. 9
24. 8
57. 8
70. 0
25. 8
83. 5
81. 7
65. 4
130. 8
0. 0
91. 3
52. 0
40. 8
40. 1
41. 1
54. 8
0. 0
678. 5
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08: 30: 30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
2201 FIRE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: FIRE
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
3402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2401 ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
275. 00
10, 100. 00
10. 375. 00
34. 838. 00
34, 838. 00
1. 100, 406. 00
1, 100. 406. 00
ANIMAL REGULTN
78, 518. 00
1, 000. 00
1, 925. 00
1. 925. 00
1, 000. 00
300. 00
84. 668. 00
1, 800. 00
5. 000. 00
6, 800. 00
400. 00
1, 800. 00
750. 00
1, 538. 00
2.500.00
50. 00
200. 00
550. 00
2, 824. 00-
4, 964. 00
1, 541. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
47. 62
47. 62
83, 750.75
83, 750. 75
6. 526. 47
62. 82
0. 00
0. 00
98. 43
18. 76
6. 706. 48
0. 00
121.85
121. 85
42. 30
2. 25
51. 90
67. 57
43. 12
0. 00
0. 00
125. 00
0.00
332. 14
0. 00
621. 91
4, 420. 48
5. 042. 39
7. 374. 25
7, 374. 25
773. 846. 34
773, 846. 34
59. 229. 19
453. 18
635. 55
503. 77
654. 84
244. 66
61. 721. 19
373. 07
2, 290. 66
2, 663. 73
337. 02
801. 67
152. 77
557. 68
2, 391. 20
35. 00
81.27
125. 00
0.00
4. 481. 61
PAGE 0013
DATE 04/19/89
75.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
0.00 346.91- 226. 1
3, 310. 02 2, 369. 50 76. 5
3. 310. 02 2. 022. 59 80. 5
0. 00 27, 463. 75 21. 1
0. 00 27, 463. 75 21. 1
4. 292. 44 322. 267. 22 70. 7
• 4, 292. 44
322, 267. 22 70. 7
0. 00 19. 288. 81 75. 4
0.00 546.82 45.3
0.00 1.289.45 33.0
0. 00 1, 421. 23 26. 1
0.00 345. 16 65.4
0. 00 55. 34 81. 5
0. 00 22, 946. 81 72. 8
0. 00 1, 426. 93 20. 7
0. 00 2, 709. 34 45. 8
0. 00 4, 136. 27 39. 1
0. 00
639. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
639. 00
62. 98 84. 2
359. i3 80. 0
597. 23 20. 3
980. 32 36. 2
108. 80 95. 6
15. 00 70. 0
118. 73 40. 6
425. 00 22. 7
2. 824. 00- 0. 0
156. 61- 103. 1
0.00 0.00 1.541.00 0.0
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
2401 ANIMAL CONTROL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2701 CIVIL DEFENSE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: ANIMAL REGULTN
13, 000. 00
14. 541. 00
680. 00
680. 00
111. 653. 00
111, 653. 00
DEPT: DISASTER PREP
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4316 TRAINING
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN *500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
3101 MEDIANS
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 42.676.00
21, 464. 00
822. 00
822. 00
0. 00
23. 108. 00
1. 700. 00
1. 700. 00
0. 00
425. 00
500. 00
3. 300. 00
1. 169. 00-
3. 056. 00
6, 325. 00
6, 325. 00
34. 189. 00
34, 189. 00
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
56. 15 505. 35
56. 15 505. 35
7, 216. 62 69. 371. 88
7, 216. 62 69, 371. 88
1. 978. 61 17, 683. 48
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 555. 25
14.'58 116. 64
1. 993. 19 18, 355. 37
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0.00 4.20
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 290. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 294. 20
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
1. 993. 19
1, 993. 19-
18. 649. 57
18, 649. 57
2,715.10 27.644. 20
PAGE 0014
DATE 04/19/89
75. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
639. 00
639. 00
13, 000. 00
14, 541. 00
174. 65
174. 65
41, 642. 12
0. 0
0. 0
74. 3
74. 3
62. 7
41, 642.12 62.7
0. 00 3. 780. 52
0. 00 822. 00
0. 00 266. 75
0. 00 116. 64-
0. 00 4, 752. 63
•
0. 00 1, 700. 00
0. O0 1. 700. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
82. 3
0.0
67. 5
0. 0
79. 4
0. 0
0. 0
4. 20- 0. 0
425. 00 0. 0
500. 00 0. 0
3, 010. 00 8. 7
1, 169. 00- 0. 0
2. 761.80 9. 6
6, 325. 00 0. 0
6. 325. 00 0. 0
15, 539. 43 54. 5
15, 539. 43 54. 5
15, 031. 80 64. 7
•
•
•
1 J, 413 L. WV Cly. /
4` FINANCE-FA454 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
TIME 08:30:30
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0015
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV ODJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
001 GENERAL FUND
3101 MEDIANS DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
300. 00
1. 011. 00
1, 011. 00
0. 00
44. 998. 00
38. 000. 00
2. 200. 00
40, 200. 00
29, 000. 00
5, 000. 00
950. 00
500. 00
2. 960. 00-
32, 490. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
585.'00
3, 300,. 10
6. 000. 00
0. 00
6. 000. 00
753. 12
0. 00
32. 99
0. 00
0. 00
786. 11
117, 688. 00 10, 086. 21
3103 ST MAINTENANCE DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4316 TRAINING
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
129. 824. 00
2, 000.00
3, 099. 00
3, 099. 00
138. 022. 00
79, 100. 00
79. 100. 00
23, 000. 00
3. 500. 00
10, 000. 00
445. 00
5. 245. 00-
31, 700. 00
10, 412. 24
0.00
O. 00
0. 00
10, 412. 24
5.428.72
5.428.72
1, 083. 63
206. 44
1. 435. 16
0. 00
0. OO'
2, 725. 23
0. 00
428. 84
383. 95
1, 944. 00
30. 400. 99
24, 000. 00
1. 259. 05
25. 259. 05
12, 702. 58
1,509.86
473. 42
456. 51
0.00
15, 142. 37
70. 802. 41
93, 105. 70
48. 00
446. 37
1.766.84
95, 366. 91
45. 787. 20
45. 787. 20
11,621.91
2,315.76
9, 791.47
429. 00
0. 00
24, 158. 14
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
303. 09
0. 00
132. 14
0. 00
0. 00
435. 23
300. 00 0. 0
582. 16 42. 4
627. 05 37. 9
1. 944. 00- 0. 0
14. 597. 01 67. 5
14. 000. 00
940. 95
14, 940. 95
16, 297. 42
3.490.14
476. 58
43. 49
2.960.00-
17,347.63
.960.00-
17,347.63
63. 1
57.2
62. 8
43. 8
30. 1
49. 8
91. 3
0. 0
46. 6
46.885.59 60. 1
36, 718. 30
1, 952. 00
2. 652. 63
1, 332. 16
42, 655. 09
33, 312. 80
33, 312. 80
11, 075. 00
1, 184. 24
76. 39
16. 00
5, 245. 00-
7, 106. 63
71. 7
2. 4
14. 4
57. 0
69. 0
57.8
57.8
51. 8
66. 1
99. 2
96. 4
0. 0
77.5
r
•
r
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08: 30: 30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
r 001 GENERAL FUND
3103 ST MAINTENANCE
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
r 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
r
DIVISION TOTAL
3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5403 VEHICLES
5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
ACH
EXPENDITURECITY SUMMOFARYHREPORT ERMOSA BEBY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN
$500
$500
0. 00
3, 355. 00
3. 355. 00
20, 844. 00
20. 844. 00
273, 021. 00
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN
83, 172. 00
500. 00
2, 103. 00
2, 103. 00
4. 000. 00
91, 878. 00
9, 700. 00
6. 000. 00
15, 700. 00
5, 600. 00
41, 000. 00
735. 00
600. 00
100. 00
250. 00
3. 054. 00-
45. 231. 00
0. 00
12, 000. 00
12, 000. 00
11, 000. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 736. 78
1. 736. 78
20, 302. 97
6, 761. 80
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
6, 761. 80
O. 00
471. 76
471. 76
513. 59
6. 663. 79-
6. 61
241. 01
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
5. 902. 58-
0. 00
11, 445. 01
11, 445. 02
0. 00
3. 354. 75
3, 354. 75
17, 367. 80
17, 367. 80
186, 034. 80
60, 499. 08
313. 45
445. 28
1. 426. 53
0. 00
62. 684. 34
5. 676. 24
3, 442. 85
9, 119. 09
4. 240. 39
19, 502. 27
327. 18
957. 69
140. 00
230. 18
0. 00
25. 397. 71
1, 996. 88
26. 658. 02
28, 654. 90
841. 29 5. 047. 74
PAGE 0016
DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE Z
3, 886. 19
0. 00
3. 886. 19
0. 00
0. 00
4.321.42
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
3, 944. 80
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
3, 944. 80
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
1, 996. 87
3, 886. 19-
0. 25
3, 885. 94-
3,476.20
4-
3,476.20
3.476.20
0. 0
99. 9
215. 8
83. 3
83. 3
82; 664. 78 69. 7
22, 672. 92
186. 55
1, 657. 72
676. 47
4, 000. 00
29, 193. 66
4. 023. 76
2, 557. 15
6, 580. 91
1, 359. 61
17, 552. 93
407. 82
357. 69-
40. 00-
19. 82
3, 054. 00-
15, 888. 49
1, 996. 88-
14. 658. 02-
16, 654. 90-
72. 7
62. 6
21. 1
67. 8
0. 0
68. 2
58. 5
57. 3
58. 0
75. 7
57. 1
44.5
159. 6
140. 0
92. 0
0. 0
64. 8
0. 0
222. 1
238. 7
3, 955. 39 64. 0
a
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08: 30: 30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
4101 PLANNING
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0017
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
11. 000. 00
175, 809. 00
566, 518. 00
DEPT: PLANNING
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4313 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN 11500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
4102 PLANNING COMM
154, 269. 00
700. 00
2. 469. 90
3. 191. 00
2, 740. 00
163, 369. 90
1. 295. 00
1. 295. 00
1. 600. 00
16, 265. 00
200. 00
500. 00
760. 00
1, 150. 00
750. 00
3, 901. 00-
17, 324. 00
1. 580. 00
500. 00
2. 080. 00
184. 068. 90
DEPT: PLANNING
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6, 120. 00
6. 120. 00
841. 29
13, 617. 28
44, 006. 46
14. 883. 84
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
19'3. 38
15, 077. 22
5, 047. 74 1, 996. 87
130, 903. 78
387, 740. 99
103, 939. 69
0. 00
1. 300. 94
2,601.24
2, 401.28
110, 243. 15
5, 941. 67
10, 263. 09
3, 955. 39 64. 0
38, 963. 55 77. 8
168, 513. 92 70. 2
0. 00 50, 329. 31
0. 00 700. 00
0. 00 1, 168. 96
0. 00 589. 76
0. 00 338. 72
0. 00 53, 126. 75
67. 3
0. 0
52. 6
81. 5
87. 6
67. 4
0. 00 120. 20 0. 00 1, 174. 80 9. 2
0. 00 120. 20 0. 00 1, 174. 80 9. 2
363. 82
1, 398. 56
4. 64
0. 00
40. 00
51. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 858. 02
384. 99
0. 00
384. 99
17. 320. 23
603. 50
603. 50
1. 400. 15
10, 757. 45
71. 37
282. 38
523. 00
1. 228. 58
543. 00
0. 00
14. 805. 93
1, 112. 47
0. 00
1, 112. 47
0. 00 199. 85 87. 5
203. 85 5, 303. 70 67. 3
0. 00 128. 63 35. 6
0. 00 217. 62 56. 4
0.00 237.00 68.8
0.00 78. 58- 106.8
0.00 207.00 72.4
0. 00 3, 901. 00- 0. 0
203. 85 2, 314. 22 86. 6
0.00 467.53 70.4
0. 00 500. 00 0. 0
0.00 967.53 53.4
126. 281. 75 203. 85
3, 995. 00
3. 995. 00
0. 00
0. 00
57. 583. 30 68. 7
2. 125. 00
2, 125. 00
65. 2
65. 2
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
4102 PLANNING COMM
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: PLANNING
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
4201 BUILDING
DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
2, 400. 00
300. 00
550. 00
217. 00-
3. 033. 00
9. 153. 00
193, 221.90
CONST/ENGIN/ENF
219. 661. 00
200. 00
5. 285. 00
5, 285. 00
230, 431. 00
50, 400. 00
700. 00
51. 100. 00
2. 226. 00
11. 145. 00
1. 000. 00
900. 00
645. 00
2, 600. 00
1. 500. 00
7, 218. 00-
12. 798. 00
0. 00
55. 00
1, 200. 00
12, 000. 00
13, 255. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
658. 67
0. 00
261.00
0. 00
919. 67
1. 523. 17
18, 843. 40
16. 172. 51
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
16. 172. 51
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
234. 93
4. 852. 82
48. 73
149. 39
0. 00
136. 72
0. 00
0. 00
5. 422. 59
0. 00
54. 26
0. 00
0.00
54. 26•
2. 636. 99
279. 93
261. 00
0. 00
3, 177. 92
7. 172. 92
133. 454. 67
152, 030. 80
0. 00
873. 04
1. 570. 48
154. 474. 32
9, 102. 33
286. 57
9, 388. 90
1. 753. 54
8.981. 18
485. 95
1. 193. 87
225. 001
2. 145. 72
1. 144. 20
0. 00
15. 929. 46
0. 00
54. 26
712. 25
0.00
766. 51
PAGE 0018
DATE 04/19/89
75.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
203. 85
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
17. 281. 40
0. 00
17. 281. 40
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
236. 99-
20. 07
289. 00
217. 00-
144. 92-
109. 8
93. 3
47. 4
0. 0
104. 7
1, 980. 08 78. 3
59, 563. 38 69. 1
67, 630. 20
200. 00
4, 411.96
3, 714. 52
75. 956. 68
24. 016. 27
413. 43
24, 429. 70
•
472. 46
2. 163. 82
514. 05
293. 87-
420. 00
454. 28
355. 80
7. 218. 00-
3. 131. 46-
0. 00
0. 74
487. 75
12, 000. 00
12, 488. 49
69. 2
0. 0
16. 5
29. 7
67. 0
52. 3
40. 9
52. 1
78. 7
80. 5
48. 5
132. 6
34. 8
82. 5
76. 2
0. 0
124. 4
0.0
98. 6
59. 3
0. 0
5. 7
•
f
•
f
r..
1
1
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
DIVISION TOTAL
4202 PUB WKS ADMIN
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0019
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
307.584.00 21.649.36
DEPT: CONST/ENQIN/ENF
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4301 DAMAGE SETTLEMENTS
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
96, 711. 00
0. 00
2, 336. 00
2, 336. 00
4, 000. 00
7. 000. 00
112, 383. 00
8, 500. 00
0. 00
8, 500. 00
4, 000. 00
5. 200. 00
8. 700. 00
0. 00
900. 00
500. 00
630. 00
1, 500. 00
1. 000. 00
3, 726. 00-
18, 704. 00
700. 00
3. 600. 00
12, 000. 00
16, 300. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 155,887.00
4204 BLDG MAINT DEPT: CONST/ENQIN/ENF
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
132, 944. 00
2, 500. 00
7, 180. 26
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
530. 37
465. 56
8. 176. 19
1.151. 75
0. 00
1, 191. 75
0. 00
385. 41
539. 48
218. 49-
57. 74
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
546. 00
0. 00
1, 310. 14
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
180, 559. 19 17, 281. 40
70, 052. 05
83. 07
222. 28
706. 75
5, 578. 33
4. 101. 36
80, 743. 84
8. 972. 74
0. 00
8, 972. 74
0. 00
3, 789. 99
6, 647. 04
0. 00
546. 33
707. 11
502. 00
1, 966. 25
666. 00
0. 00
14, 824. 72
664. 09
1. 578. 60
0. 00
2, 242. 69
10. 678. 08 106, 783. 99
10, 521. 95
75. 62
98, 299. 97
950. 59
109. 743.41 64.3
0.00 26.658.95 72.4
0.00 83.07- 0.0
0. 00 2. 113. 72 9. 5
0.00 1,629.25 30.2
0. 00 1, 578. 33- 139. 4
0.00 2.898.64 58.5
0. 00 31, 639. 16 71. 8
479.00 951.74- 111. 1
0. 00 0. 00 0. 0
479.00 951.74- 111.1
0.00 4.000.00 0.0
0. 00 1, 410. 01 72. 8
104.96 1,948.00 77.6
0. 00 0. 00 0. 0
0.00 353.67 60.7
0.00 207. 11- 141.4
0. 00 128. 00 79. 6
0.00 466.25- 131.0
0.00 334.00 66.6
0. 00 3, 726. 00- 0. 0
104. 96 3, 774. 32 79. 8
0. 00 35. 91 94. 8
0. 00 2, 021. 40 43. 8
0. 00 12. 000.. 00 0. 0
0. 00 14, 057. 31 13. 7
583.96 40.519.05 68.8
0. 00
0. 00
34. 644. 03
1, 549. 41
73. 9
38. 0
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 0131:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
4204 BLDG MAINT
DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4316 TRAINING
4321 BUILDING SAFETY/SECURITY
4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS
5601 BUILDINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
4205 EQUIP SERVICE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
CONST/ENGIN/ENF
3. 177. 00
3. 177. 00
300. 00
142. 098. 00
17, 860. 00
17. 860. 00
75. 000. 00
45. 000. 00
1, 000. 00
1. 200. 00
500. 00
4. 200.00
6. 650. 00-
120. 250. 00
0.00
0.00
5. 000. 00
5. 000. 00
285. 208. 00
DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
91. 095. 00
200. 00
2. 186. 00
2. 186. 00
95. 667. 00
3, 495. 00
2. 000. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00
0.00
16. 68
10, 614. 25
2. 385. 00
2. 385. 00
7, 953. 97
520. 32
55. 38
78. 06
0. 00
1, 115. 64-
0. 00
7. 492. 09
1. 332. 85
1. 332. 85
0. 00
0.00
21.824. 19
. 7, 444. 75
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
7, 444. 75
267. 31
108. '29
27. 40
2.985.43
233. 36
102. 496. 75
12, 689. 99
12. 689. 99
63. 437. 48
27. 113. 50
617. 59
567. 29
0. 00
5. 882. 51
0. 00
97. 618. 37
1, 332. 85
1. 332. 85
0.00
O. 00
214. 137. 96
66. 853. 79
76. 37
278. 89
652. 95
67. 862. 00
3, 316. 78
1. 035. 01
PAGE 0020
DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
434. 32
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
434. 32
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
434. 32
Q. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
3.149.60
191. 57
66. 64
39. 601. 25
5, 170. 01
5. 170. 01
11, 562.52
17.452. 18
382. 41
632. 71
500. 00
1,682.51-
6,650.00-
22.197.31
,682.51-
6,650.00-
22.197.31
0.8
93. 9
77. 7
72. 1
71.0
71.0
84. 5
61.2
61.7
47.2
0.0
140. 0
0.0
81. 5
1, 332. 85- 0. 0
1. 332. 85- 0. 0
5, 000. 00 0. 0
5. 000. 00 0. 0
70.635.72 75.2
24, 241.21
123. 63
1, 907. 11
1, 533. 05
27. 805. 00
178. 22
964. 99
73. 3
38. 1
12. 7
29. 8
70. 9
94. 9
51.7
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
4205 EQUIP SERVICE DEPT:
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4316 TRAINING
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
4601 COMM RESOURCES
DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4302 ADVERTISING
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LURES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
CONST/ENGIN/ENF
2. 780. 00
255. 00
2. 927. 00-
5. 603. 00
1. 720. 00
8. 000. 00
9. 720. 00
6. 828. 00
6. 828. 00
117.818. 00
866. 497. 00
COMM PROMOTION
135. 065. 00
500. 00
3. 741. 00
3. 741. 00
49. 000. 00
192. 047. 00
56, 525. 00
56. 525. 00
3. 500. 00
5. 300. 00
9. 465. 00
4. 000. 00
500. 00
100. 00
625. 00
1,000. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
156. 17
0. 00
0. 00
531. 77
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
417.96
417.96
8,394.48
62. 546. 11
13. 010. 74
0.90
0. 00
0. 00
3. 699. 13
16. 709. 87
9. 099. 50
9. 099. 50
946. 37
541. 18
576. 69
391. 26
16. 72
192. 61
330. 00
0. 00
2. 066. 19
255. 00
0. 00
6, 672. 98
1, 719. 78
0. 00
1. 719. 78
4,179.60
4,179.60
80, 434. 36
581. 915. 50
97. 576. 04
480. 74
1. 129. 87
2. 051. 28
37, 632. 27
138, 870. 20
35. 365. 05
35. 365. 05
1. 020. 92
2, 871. 21
7. 454. 96
2. 724. 34
180. 23
455. 30
525. 00
677. 65
PAGE 0021
DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE ti
45. 79
0. 00
0. 00
45. 79
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
45. 79
18, 345. 47
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
1, 600. 00
0.00
262. 89
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
668. 02
0. 00
2. 927. 00-
1, 115. 77-
0. 22
8, 000. 00
8, 000. 22
2. 648. 40
2. 648. 40
75. 9
100.0
0. 0
119.9
99. 9
0.0
17. 6
61.2
6/.2
37, 337. 85 68. 3
266. 236. 03 69. 2
37, 488. 96
19. 26
2.611. 13
1,689.72
11, 367.73
53, 176. 80
21, 159. 95
21, 159. 95
879. 08
2, 428. 79
1. 747. 15
1, 275. 66
319. 77
355. 30-
100. 00
322. 35
72. 2
96. 1
30. 2
54. 8
76. 8
72. 3
62. 5
62. 5
74. 8
54. 1
81. 5
68. 1
36. 0
455. 3
84. 0
67. 7
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08: 30: 30
FUND DIV ODJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
4601 COMM RESOURCES
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: COMM PROMOTION
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4319 SPECIAL EVENTS
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
6101 PARKS DEPT:
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
i 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4304 TELEPHONE
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
1. 600. 00
10. 000. 00
6, 660. 00-
29, 430. 00
7. 585. 00
44, 700. 00
8, 000. 00
60, 285. 00
2. 300. 00
2. 300. 00
340, 587. 00
340. 587. 00
PARKS/REC
68. 532. 00
500. 00
1, 638. 00
1. 638. 00
0. 00
72. 308. 00
107, 020. 00
12. 600. 00
119, 620. 00
19, 000. 00
120. 00
9. 420. 00
800. 00
1. 450. 00
660. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
627. 40
1. 428. 00
0. 00
5, 050. 23
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
189. 21
184. 21
31. 048. 81
31, 048. 81
4. 434. 30
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
877. 50
5.311.80
17. 420. 00
0. 00
17. 420_00
2. 206. 80
26. 36
1. 534. 04
20. 37
121.43
0. 00
1. 758. 99
7, 434. 45
0. 00
25. 103. 05
4, 757. 98
2, 077. 70
0. 00
6, 835. 68
1. 695. 40
1, 695. 40
207, 869. 38
207. 869. 38
44, 056. 16
0. 00
198. 70
383. 95
2. 916. 00
47, 554. 81
73. 670. 00
0. 00
73, 670. 00
16. 735. 43
110. 39
10. 158. 69
369. 40
713. 95
167. 00
PAGE 0022
DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 862. 89
1. 064. 23
0.00
0. 00
1, 064. 23
0. 00
0. 00
2.927.12
2.927.12
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
446. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
158. 99-
2. 565. 55
6, 660. 00-
2, 464. 06
1. 762. 79
42, 622. 30
8. 000. 00
52, 385. 09
109. 9
74. 3
0. 0
91. 6
76. 7
4.6
0. 0
13. 1
604. 60 73. 7
604. 60 73. 7
129. 790. 50 61. 8
129, 790. 50 61. 8
24, 475. 84 64. 2
500. 00 0. 0
1. 439. 30 12. 1
1, 254. 05 23. 4
2, 916. 00- 0. 0
24, 753. 19 65. 7
33, 350. 00 68. 8
12, 600. 00 0. 0
45, 950. 00 61. 5
2, 264. 57 88. 0
9. 61 91. 9
1. 184. 69- 112. 5
430. 60 46. 1
736. 05 49. 2
493. 00 25. 3
s
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
F I NANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0023
TIME 08:30:30 FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
001 GENERAL FUND
6101 PARKS DEPT: PARKS/REC
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4316 TRAININQ
4397 2.5. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5403 VEHICLES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8176 CIP 86-176
500. 00
5. 886. 00-
26, 064. 00
15. 000. 00
15. 000. 00
232, 992. 00
232. 992. 00
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
40, 200. 00
40. 200. 00
1, 005. 00-
1. 005. 00 -
DIVISION TOTAL 39, 195. 00
8177 CIP 87-177 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
40. 000. 00
40, 000. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 40.000.00
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 79, 195. 00
8601 CIP 86-601 DEPT: BLDQS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 402.00-
3 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 402.00
0. 00
0. 00
3. 909. 00
0. 00
0. 00
26. 640. BO
26, 640. 80
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
O. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
99. 00
0. 00
28, 353. 86
0.00 401.00 19.8
0. 00 5, 886. 00- 0. 0
446. 00 2. 735. 86- 110. 4
0. 00 0. 00 15. 000. 00 0. 0
0.00 0.00 15.000.00 0.0
149. 578. 67
149. 578. 67
2. 554. 88
2. 554. 88
0. 00
0. 00
2. 554. 88
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2, 554. 88
446.00 82.967.33 64.3
446. 00 82, 967. 33 64. 3
0.00 37.645. 12 6.3
0. 00 37, 645. 12 6. 3
0.00 1,005.00- 0.0
0. 00 1. 005. 00- 0. 0
0.00 36.640. 12 6.5
0. 00 40, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 40, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 40, 000. 00 0. 0
0. 00 76, 640. 12 3. 2
0. 00 615. 00 0. 00
0. 00 615. 00 0. 00
213. 00-
213. 00-
152. 9
152. 9
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 GENERAL FUND
8601 CIP 86-601
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4316 TRAINING
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
2. 598. 00
0. 00
75. 00-
2, 523. 00
2. 925. 00
8602 CIP 86-602 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4397 2. 5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
88. 298. 00
88. 298. 00
0. 00
625. 00-
625. 00-
87, 673. 00
8604 CIP 86-604 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
38, 600. 00
38. 600. 00
1, 550. 00
949. 00-
601. 00
39. 201. 00
8606 CIP 87-606 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
109, 024. 00
109. 024. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
2, 597. 54
0. 00
0. 00
2, 597. 54
2. 597. 54
1. 267. 00
1.267.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 267. 00
0.00
0.00
747. 94
0.00
747. 94
747. 94
0.00
0.00
2, 597. 54
1, 906. 13
0. 00
4. 503. 67
5, 118. 67
42, 358. 70
42. 358. 70 g
11. 86
0. 00
11. 86
42, 370. 56
9,612.54
9.612.54
3.303.51
0. 00
3.303.51
12. 916. 05
65,717.46
65, 717. 46
PAGE 0024
DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
2, 673. 95
0. 00
2, 673. 95
2. 673. 95
4, 800. 00
4, 800. 00
0. 46 99. 9
1, 906. 13- 0. 0
75. 00- 0. 0
1.980.67- 178.5
2.193.67- 174.9
45, 939. 30 47. 9
45, 939. 30 47. 9
11. 86- 0. 0
625. 00- 0. 0
636. 86- 1. 8
45, 302. 44 48. 3
28, 987. 46 24. 9
20.987.46 24.9
4,427.46- 385. 6
949.00- 0.0
5,376.46- 994. 5
23, 611.00 39. 7
38. 506. 54
38, 506. 54
64. 6
64. 6
A
a
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0025
TIME 08:30:30 FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
001 GENERAL FUND
8606 CIP 87-606 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5400 EQUIPMENT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS
5602 IMPRVMTS OTHER THN BLDGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
500. 55
500. 55
0.00
0.00
109.024.00 500.55
8610 CIP 88-610 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
94, 974. 00
94. 974. 00
1. 843. 00-
1, 843. 00 -
DIVISION TOTAL 93.131.00
8612 CIP 88-612 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL •
DIVISION TOTAL
8614 CIP 88-614
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
10, 000. 00
10. 000. 00
0. 00
250. 00-
250. 00-
1, 625. 92
1. 625. 92
0. 00
0. 00
1. 625. 92
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
9, 750. 00 0. 00
DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
161.492.00 276.84
678. 75
678. 75
500. 55
500. 55
1, 996. 16
1. 996. 16
68. 892. 92
4, 365. 29
4, 365. 29
0. 00
0. 00
4, 365. 29
800. 00
800. 00
1, 078. 60
0. 00
1. 078. 60
1. 878. 60
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
4, 800. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
16. 873. 50 0. 00
678. 75-
678. 75-
500. 55-
500. 55-
1, 996. 16-
1, 996. 16-
35, 331. 08
90, 608. 71
90, 608. 71
1. 843. 00-
1. 843. 00-
88. 765. 71
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
67. 5
4. 5
4. 5
0.0
0. 0
4. 6
9. 200. 00 8. 0
9, 200. 00 8. 0
1. 078. 60- 0. 0
250. 00- 0. 0
1, 328. 60- 431. 4
7.871.40 19.2
144, 618.50 10.4
4
oft
0
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08: 30: 30
r, FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
001 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0026
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75. 07 OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
7.
8614 CIP 88-614 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 161, 492. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 161, 492. 00
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 503, 196. 00
FUND TOTAL 10, 131, 614. 90
276. 84
276. 84
7, 015. 79
793, 680. 03
16, 873. 50 0. 00
16, 873. 50
152, 415. 59
6, 959, 968. 02
i
0. 00
7, 473. 95
65, 363. 02
144, 618. 50 10. 4
144, 618. 50
343, 306. 46
3, 106, 283. 86
10. 4
31. 7
69. 3
r FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITVRE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
r'' l TIME 08:30:30 PAGE 0027
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
DATE 04/19/89
rFUND DIV ODJT DESCR 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
103 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
r•
30, 500. 00
30. 500. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 30.500.00
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 30. 500. 00
ID 2601 STREET LIGHTING DEPT: STREET LIGHTING
1
r
r'
7
•
4100 PERSONAL. SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4180 RETIREMENT
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4304 TELEPHONE
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4316 TRAINING
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
3400 EQUIPMENT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
68, 904. 00
1, 000. 00
1. 650. 00
1, 650. 00
4, 000. 00
11, 394. 00
8. 751. 00
97. 349. 00
18. 150. 00
8, 000. 00
26, 150. 00
180, 000. 00
300. 00
12, 500. 00
2, 500.00
5, 500. 00
500. 00
201. 300. 00
0. 00
0.00
324. 799. 00
324, 799. 00
2. 542. 00
2, 542. 00
2, 542. 00
2, 542. 00
5, 896. 50
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
495. 00
736. 21
720. 13
7. 847. e4
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
14. 958. 95
0. 00
751. 00
202. 58
64. 61
0. 00
15, 977. 14
22. 878. 00
22. 978. 00
22, 879. 00
22. 878. 00
52. 790. 17
0. 00
27. 40
973. 35
495. 00
5, 171.86
5, 607. 74
65, 065. 52
6,500.00
3,362.43
9,862.43
120.651. 74
80. 84
4. 778. 82
1, 692. 99 g
3. 610. 71
99. 00
130. 914. 10
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
23, 824. 98
23, 824. 98
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
53. 09
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
53. 09
4.074.41
4.074.41
205. 842. 05 4,127.50
205, 842. 05 4,127.50
7. 622. 00
7, 622. 00
7. 622. 00
7. 622. 00
16, 113. 83
1, 000. 00
1, 622. 60
676. 65
3. 505. 00
6, 222. 14
3, 143. 26
32. 283. 4B
11, 650.00
4.637.57
16, 287. 57
59, 348. 26
219. 16
7. 668. 09
807. 01
1. 889. 29
401.00
70, 332. el
4,074.41-
4,074.41-
75.0
,074.41-
4,074.41-
75.0
75. 0
75. 0
75. 0
76. 6
0. 0
1. 6
58. 9
12. 3
45. 3
64. 0
66. 8
35. 8
42. 0
37. 7
67. 0
26. 9
38. 6
67. 7
65. 6
19. 8
65. 0
0.0
0. 0
114, 829.45 64.6
114, 829.45 64.6
r
I^
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND
8201 CIP 85-201
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (8Y FUND) PAGE 0028
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: STREET LIGHTING
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
0.00
0.00
43, 126. 00
43, 126. 00
874. 00
874. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
873. 56
873. 56
44, 000. 00 873. 56
41 8202 CIP 85-202 DEPT: STREET LIGHTING
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
0"` 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 49.500.00 560.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 49.500.00
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
0.00
0.00
560., 00
0.00
0.00
49.500.00 560.00
8203 CIP 85-203 DEPT: STREET LIGHTING
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
27, 500. 00
27, 500. 00
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
27.500.00
121, 000. 00
476, 299. 00
0.00
0.00
1, 433. 56
27, 800. 54
180. 00
180. 00
4.654.59
4,654.59
873. 56
873. 56
5.708. 15
17. 707. 40
17, 707. 40
32. 22
32. 22
17. 739. 62
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
4, 561. 40
4, 561. 40
0. 00
0. 00
4, 561. 40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
620. 00 0. 00
620. 00 0. 00
620. 00
24, 067. 77
252, 787. 82
0. 00
4, 561. 40
8, 688. 90
180. 00-
180. 00-
33, 910. 01
33. 910. 01
0. 0
0.0
21.3
21.3
0. 44 99. 9
0. 44 99. 9
33, 730. 45 23. 3
31, 792.60
31, 792. 60
35. 7
35. 7
32. 22- 0. 0
32. 22- 0. 0
31. 760. 38 35. 8
26, 880. 00
26, 880. 00
26, 880. 00
92, 370. 83
214, 822. 28
2. 2
2. 2
2. 2
23. 6
54. 8
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0029
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION
110 PARKING FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 1, 423. 508. 00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 423. 508. 00
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
3301 VEH PKG DIST
1, 423. 508. 00
1, 423, 508. 00
DEPT: PKG FACILITIES
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4180 RETIREMENT
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
14. 553. 00
0. 00
358. 00
358. 00
2. 997. 00
977. 00
19. 243. 00
44, 361. 00
44, 361. 00
100. 00
200. 00
1, 000. 00
1. 300. 00
700. 00
700. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 65.604.00
3302 PARKING ENF DEPT: PKG FACILITIES
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 473.598.00
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 10,000.00
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 11,579.00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
117. 400. 00 1. 071, 307. 00
117, 400. 00 1, 071, 307. 00
117, 400. 00 1, 071. 30 7. 00
117. 400. 00 1. 071. 307. 00
1. 191. 20
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
162. 35
70. 31
1, 423. 86
3. 368. 88
3. 368. 88
10. 32
15. 84
0. 00
26. 16
0. 00
0. 00
4. 818. 90
36. 679. ,10
2. 037. 55
0. 00
10. 985. 34
2. 33
0. 00
0. 00
1. 241.65
785. 91
13. 015. 23
29, 547. 44
29. 547. 44
151. 56
198. 15
0. 00
349. 71
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE Y.
0.00 352,201.00 75.2
0. 00 352, 201. 00 75. 2
0. 00 352, 201.00 75. 2
0. 00 352, 201. 00 75. 2
0.00 3.567.66 75.4
0. 00 2. 33- 0. 0
0.00 358.00 0.0
0.00 358.00 0.0
0. 00 1. 755. 35 41. 4
0. 00 191. 09 80. 4
0. 00 6, 227. 77 67. 6
0. 00 14, 813. 56 66. 6
0. 00 14,813. 56 66. 6
0. 00 51. 56- 151. 5
0. 00 1. 85 99. 0
0. 00 1. 000. 00 0. 0
0.00 950.29 26.9
0.00 0.00 700.00 0.0
0.00 0.00 700.00 0.0
42. 912. 38
328. 466. 52
10, 196. 90
1. 379. 86
0.00 22.691.62 65.4
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
145, 131. 48
196. 90-
10. 199. 14
69. 3
101. 9
11. 9
0
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08: 30: 30
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0030 1
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
110 PARKING FUND
3302 PARKING ENF DEPT: PKG FACILITIES
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY
4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
4180 RETIREMENT
4187 UNIFORMS
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4301 DAMAGE SETTLEMENTS
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN 4500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN *500
5403 VEHICLES
5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
11. 579. 00
45, 000. 00
5. 000. 00
68, 579. 00
4, 000. 00
60. 732. 00
690. 067. 00
5, 000. 00
5. 000. 00
1, 000. 00
3. 000. 00
44. 599. 00
19. 373. 00
8. 000. 00
8. 665. 00
400. 00
2.000.00
2, 000.00
89, 037. 00
0. 00
401. 00
28. 691.00
28, 500. 00
0. 00
57. 592. 00
8, 500. 00
8, 500. 00
850, 196. 00
915, 800. 00
2. 339, 308. 00
84. 84
320. 00
319. 39
4, 733. 74
192. 08
4, 267. 91
48. 634. 61
0. 00
0. 00
2, 751. 71
13, 283. 50
3, 412. 04
36, 250. 99
2. 889. 39
37. 129. 69
435. 760. 60
2. 990. 67
2, 990. 67
0. 00 0. 00
435. 00 2, 277. 87
3. 590. 55 23, 393. 10
4. 959. 08 12. 495. 38
336.49 4.180.04
942. 65 12. 162. 52
0. 00 240. 00
29. 00 1, 834. 43
0. 00 1. 366. 23
10.292.77 57.949.57
4. 645. 45- 0. 00
0. 00 1, 417. 65
0. 00 15, 959. 77
0. 00 0. 00
4. 645. 45 4, 645. 45
0.00 22.022.87
114.00
114. 00
59, 041. 38
63. 860. 28
181. 260. 28'
7, 839. 41
7. 839. 41
526, 563. 12
569. 475. 50
1. 640, 782. 50
0.00 8.827.29 23.7
0. 00 31, 716. 50 29. 5
0. 00 1. 587. 96 68. 2
0. 00 32, 328. 01 52. 8
0. 00 1, 110. 61 72. 2
0. 00 23, 602. 31 61. 1
0. 00 254, 306. 40 63. 1
0.00 2.009.33 59.8
0. 00 2, 009. 33 59. 8
0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0
0.00 722. 13 75.9
127. 01 21, 078. 89 52. 7
224. 93 6. 652. 69 65. 6
0. 00 3. 819. 96 52. 2
614. 88 4. 112. 40- 147. 4
0. 00 160. 00 60. 0
0.00 165.57 91.7
0.00 633.77 68.3
966. 82 30, 120. 61 66. 1
0. 00 0. 00 0. 0
0.00 1.016.65- 353.5
0. 00 12, 731. 23 55. 6
0.00 28.500.00 0.0
0.00 4.645.45- 0.0
0.00 35.569. 13 38.2
0.00 660.59 92.2
0.00 660. 59 92.2
966. 82
966. 82
966. 82
322, 666. 06
345. 357. 68
697. 558. 68
62. 0
62. 2
70. 1
4111
9
i
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0031
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION
115 STATE GAS TAX FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
3101 MEDIANS
86. 250. 00
86. 250. 00
86.250. 00
86. 250. 00
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
0.00
0.00
DIVISION TOTAL 0.00
3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8160 CIP 85-160
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
6.354.00
6,354.00
6.354. 00
6.354.00
0.00
0.00
d.00
67. 188. 00
67. 188. 00
67. 188. 00
67. 188. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00 471.76- 471.76-a
0.00 471.76- 471.76-
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0.00
0.00
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
8165 CIP 87-165
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
124. 300. 00
124, 300. 00
124. 300. 00
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
471.76- 471.76-
471.76- 471.76-
0.00 39.470.50
0. 00 38, 470. 50
0.00 38,470.50
19.351.00 222.00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
13. 994. 00 0. 00
19. 062. 00
19, 062. 00
19. 062. 00
19. 062. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
471. 76
471.76
0.00
0.00
471. 76
471. 76
85. 829. 50
85, 829. 50
85, 829. 50
77. 8
77. 8
77. 9
77. 8
0. 0
0. 0
0.0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
30. 9
30. 9
30. 9
5. 357. 00 72. 3
a
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0032 1
TIME 08:30:30 FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
115 STATE GAS TAX FUND
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 19, 351.00
DIVISION TOTAL 19.351.00
8170 CIP 87-170 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
137, 500. 00
137. 500. 00
0.00
0.00
DIVISION TOTAL 137. 500.00
8171 CIP 87-171 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
145, 941.00
145. 941. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 145, 941.00
8174 CIP 88-174 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8302 CIP 87-302
132, 000. 00
132. 000. 00
132, 000. 00
559, 092. 00
DEPT: STORM DRAIN
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
64, 896. 00
64, 896. 00
64, 896. 00
222. 00 13, 994. 00
222. 00 13, 994. 00
0. 00 2, 175. 47
0.00 2, 175. 47
2.524.05 2.524.05
2, 524. 05 2, 524. 05
2.524.05 4.699.52
0. 00 60. 361. 96
0. 00 60, 361. 96
0. 00 60. 361. 96
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2, 746. 05
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5, 357. 00 72. 3
5. 357. 00 72. 3
135. 324. 53
135. 324. 53
2. 524. 05-
2. 524. 05-
0. 00 132. 800. 48
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00 0. 00
117, 525. 98 0. 00
39, 201. 19
39, 201. 19
0.00
0.00
O. 00 39, 201. 19 0. 00
85. 579. 04
85, 579. 04
85, 579. 04
132, 000. 00
132, 000. 00
132. 000. 00
441, 566. 02
25, 694. 81
25, 694. 81
25. 694. 81
1. 5
1. 5
0. 0
0. 0
3. 4
41. 3
41. 3
41. 3
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
21.0
60. 4
60. 4
60. 4
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
115 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES
8302 CIP 87-302
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0033 I
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89 , "
75.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: STORM DRAIN
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
64. 896. 00 0. 00
710. 238. 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
39, 201. 19 0. 00
8,628.29 223. 443. 41
25, 694. 81 60. 4
0.00 486.794.59 31.4
C
•
• •
r"
•
•
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES
8502 CIP 85-502 DEPT: PARKS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
5, 500. 00
5. 500. 00
0.00
0.00
5. 500. 00
8506 CIP 86-506 DEPT: PARKS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS
5602 IMPRVMTS OTHER THN BLOCS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
10. 000. 00
10. 000. 00
0.00
0.00
10, 000. 00
8507 CIP 87-507 DEPT: PARKS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
5. 100. 00
5. 100. 00
5. 100. 00
8508 CIP 87-508 DEPT: PARKS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
121. 000. 00
121. 000. 00
121. 000. 00
141, 600. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 506.35
0. 00 506. 35
0. 00 9.445.49
0. 00 9,445.49
O. 00 9, 951. 84
O. 00 O. 00
O. 00 O. 00
O. 00 O. 00
1, 954. 55
1. 954. 55
1. 954. 55
11, 906. 39
899. 14
899. 14
899. 14
899.'14
PAGE 0034
DATE 04/19/89
75.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE v.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1, 000. 00
1. 000. 00
1. 000. 00
1. 000. 00
5, 500. 00
5, 500. 00
0. 00
0. 00
5, 500. 00
9, 493. 65
9.493.65
9,445.49-
9,445.49-
48.16
,445.49-
9,445.49-
48.16
5, 100. 00
5. 100. 00
5, 100. 00
118, 045. 45
118, 045. 45
118, 045. 45
128, 693. 61
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
5. 0
5.0
0. 0
0. 0
99. 5
0. 0
0. 0
0.0
2. 4
2. 4
2 4
9. 1
a
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0035 v
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE '
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X
125 UUT,RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND
8508 CIP 87-508 DEPT: PARKS
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
FUND TOTAL 141, 600.00 899.14 11, 906.39 1.000.00 128. 693.61 9.1
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0036
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
126 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
127 67.. UTILITY USER TAX FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0037
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
1, 041, 954. 00 86, 829. 00
1. 041. 954. 00 86, 829. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 1, 041, 954. 00 86, 829. 00
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1, 041. 954.00 86. 829.00
FUND TOTAL 1. 041. 954. 00 86, 829. 00
781, 464. 00
781. 464. 00
781, 464. 00
781, 464. 00
781. 464. 00
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
260, 490. 00
260, 490. 00
260. 490. 00
260, 490. 00
260. 490. 00
74. 9
74. 9
74. 9
74. 9
74. 9
011
e
a
FINANCE-FA434
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
130 REVENUE SHARING FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY. REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0038
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE '
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
a
1'
30, 700. 00
30, 700. 00
30, 700. 00
30. 700. 00
30, 700. 00
1, 590. 00
1. 590. 00
1, 590. 00
1, 390. 00
1. 59Q. 00
25, 930. 00
25, 930. 00
25. 930. 00
25, 930. 00
25, 930. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
4, 770. 00
4, 770. 00
4, 770. 00
4, 770. 00
4, 770. 00
84. 4
84. 4
84. 4
84. 4
84. 4
0
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0039
TIME 08:30:30 FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND
3401 DIAL A RIDE DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4180 RETIREMENT
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
14, 730. 00
0. 00
2, 004. 00
1, 078. 00
17, 812. 00
142, 820. 00
142, 820. 00
50. 00
300. 00
350. 00
1. 159. 98
360. 55-
47. 91
50. 34
897. 68
0. 00
0. 00
4.16
0. 00
4. 16
160.982.00 ' 901.84
3402 COMMUTER BUS DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4. 931. 00 598. 31
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 0.00 360.55-
4180 RETIREMENT 666.00 15.85
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 372.00 21.03
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5.969.00 274.64
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 40.000.00 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 40,000.00 0.00
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00
DIVISION TOTAL 45, 969. 00 274. 64
3403 BUS PASS SUBSDY DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 1, 498. 00 45. 76
10, 858. 07
0. 00
1, 158. 86
737. 91
12. 754. 84
71, 837. 34
71, 837. 34
33. 28
10. 14
43. 42
84, 635. 60
3. 970. 95
0. 00
390. 04
262. 78
4. 623. 77
0. 00
0. 00
6. 00
6. 00
4, 629. 77
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00.
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
171. 60 0. 00
3, 871. 93
0. 00
845. 14
340. 09
5. 057. 16
70. 982. 66
70. 982. 66
16. 72
289. 86
306. 58
76, 346. 40
960. 05
0. 00
275. 96
109. 22
1. 345. 23
40, 000. 00
40. 000. 00
73. 7
0. 0
57. 8
68. 4
71. 6
50. 2
50. 2
66. 5
3. 3
12. 4
52. 5
80. 5
0. 0
58. 5
70. 6
77. 4
0. 0
0. 0
6. 00- 0. 0
6. 00- 0. 0
41, 339. 23 10. 0
1, 326. 40 11. 4
a
•
s
i
,,
1
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND
3403 BUS PASS SUBSDY
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4180 RETIREMENT
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
0. 00
36. 00
36. 00
203. 00
126. 00
1. 899. 00
16. 048. 00
16. 048. 00
70. 00
70. 00
18, 017. 00
3406 CIRC ELEMENT DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
17. 735. 00
17, 735. 00
17. 735. 00
242, 703. 00
242. 703. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 61
0. 00
0. 00
16. 94
10. 49
72. 80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
72. 80
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1. 249. 28
1. 249. 28
6.98
0.00
0.00
125. 72
104. 48
408. 78
7. 741. 00
7. 741.00
0. 00
0. 00
8. 149. 78
0.00
0.00
0. 00
97. 415. 15
97,415. 15
PAGE 0040
DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
6. 98- 0. 0
36. 00 0. 0
36. 00 0. 0
77. 28 61. 9
21. 52 82. 9
1. 490. 22 21. 5
8, 307. 00 48. 2
8. 307. 00 48. 2
70. 00 0. 0
70. 00 0. 0
9,867.22 45.2
17. 735. 00
17. 735. 00
17, 735. 00
145. 287. 85
145, 287. 85
0. 0
0.0
0.0
40. 1
40. 1
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
150 GRANT FUND
8102 CIP 85-102
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) u PAGE 0041
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
118, 800. 00
118. 800. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 118, 800.00
8137 CIP 85-137 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
72, 600. 00
72. 600. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 72, 600.00
8138 CIP 85-138 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
191, 400. 00
191. 400. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 191, 400.00
8173 CIP 88-173 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
8508 CIP 87-508
132, 000. 00
132. 000. 00
132. 000. 00
514. 800. 00
DEPT: PARKS
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
0.00
0.00
449. 70 2, 996. 05 16, 000. 00
449. 70 2. 996. 05 16, 000. 00
449. 70 2. 996. 05 16, 000. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
0.00 5.398.00 0.00
0. 00 5, 398. 00 0. 00
0. 00 5, 398. 00 0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
449. 70
0.00
0.00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
8, 394. 05
7. 15
7.15
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
16. 000. 00
0.00
0.00
7. 15 0. 00
99.803. 95
99, 803. 95
99, 803. 95
72, 600. 00
72, 600. 00
72, 600. 00
186. 002. 00
186. 002. 00
186. 002. 00
132. 000. 00
132, 000. 00
132, 000. 00
490, 405. 95
7. 15-
7. 15-
15. 9
15.9
15. 9
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
2. 8
2. 8
2. 8
0. 0
0. 0
0.0
4. 7
0. 0
0. 0
7. 15- 0. 0
C
•
r
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
150 CROSSING GUARD FUND
8508 CIP 87-508
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0042
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: PARKS
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
0. 00 0. 00
514, 800.00 449.70
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
7. 15 0. 00
8, 401. 20 16, 000. 00
7.15-
490,398.80
.15-
490,398.80
0. 0
4. 7
a
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0043 1
TIME 08:30:30 FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE %
155 CROSSING GUARD FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2102 CROSSING GUARD
4. 500. 00
4. 500. 00
4. 500. 00
4, 500. 00
DEPT: POLICE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4113 CROSSING GUARDS
4180 RETIREMENT
4187 UNIFORMS
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
11. 080. 00
267. 00
267. 00
36, 000. 00
1. 506. 00
1, 000. 00
780. 00
50. 900. 00
7. 700. 00
500. 00
8, 200. 00
59. 100. 00
59. 100. 00
63, 600. 00
375..00
375. 00
375. 00
375. 00
989. 85
0. 00
0, 00
2. 894. 76
211. 24
0. 00
75. 36
4, 171. 21
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
4,171.21
4.171.21
4.546.21
3. 375. 00
3, 375. 00
3. 375. 00
3. 375. 00
8. 317. 08
0. 00
300. 39
18. 864. 93
1. 648. 16
408. 47
607. 46
30. 146. 49
2. 000. 00
0. 00
2. 000. 00
32. 146. 49
32, 146. 49
35, 521. 49
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
1, 125. 00
1, 125. 00
1. 125. 00
1, 125. 00
75. 0
75. 0
75. 0
75. 0
2.762.92 75.0
267.00 0.0
33.39- 112.5
17. 135. 07 52. 4
142. 16- 109. 4
591.53 40.8
172.54 77.e
20, 753. 51 59. 2
5. 700. 00 25. 9
500. 00 0. 0
6. 200. 00 24. 3
26. 953. 51 54. 3
26, 953. 51 54. 3
28, 078. 51 55. 8
a
1
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0044
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
160 SEWER FUND 1
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
3102 SEWER/ST DRAIN
54. 529. 00
54. 529. 00
54. 529. 00
54, 529. 00
DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4106 REGULAR OVERTIME
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4180 RETIREMENT
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4303 UTILITIES
4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE
4316 TRAINING
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5400 EQUIPMENT
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
86. 275. 00
2, 500. 00
2. 081. 00
2. 081. 00
12, 101. 00
7. 791.00
112, 829. 00
2. 700. 00
2. 700. 00
5. 400. 00
900. 00
8. 611. 00
1, 500. 00
1. 500. 00
150. 00
12. 661.00
0. 00
989. 00
989. 00
9. 070. 00
9, 070. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 140. 949.00
1. 988. 00
1, 988. 00
1. 988. 00
1. 988. 00
6, 577.'30
0.00
0. 00
0.00
813. 34
573. 85
7. 964. 49
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
61. 13
1.167.73
62. 43
17.69
0.00
1.308.98
0. 00
0. 00
Q. 00
748. 32
748. 32
48. 566. 00
48. 566. 00
48. 566. 00
48. 566. 00
59. 761. 92
338. 57
446. 37
1.199.70
6,514.39
4.652.83
72, 913. 78
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
547. 81
4, 658. 91
554. 90
766. 40
0. 00
6. 528. 02
435. 79
0.00
435. 79
7. 483. 20
7, 483. 20
10, 021. 79 87. 360. 79
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
53. 09
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
53. 09
0. 00
995. 88
995. 88
0. 00
0. 00
1. 048. 97
5. 963. 00
5, 963. 00
5. 963. 00
5, 963. 00
26, 513. 08
2,161.43
1,634.63
881. 30
5.586.61
3.138.17
39.915.22
2, 700. 00
2. 700. 00
5. 400. 00
352. 19
3, 899. 00
945. 10
733. 60
150. 00
6, 079. 89
435.79-
6.88-
442.67-
1,
35.79-
6.88-
442.67-
1, 586. 80
1. 586. 80
89. 0
89. 0
89. 0
89. 0
69. 2
13. 5
21.4
57.6
53. 8
59. 7
64. 6
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
60. 8
54. 7
36. 9
51. 0
0.0
51. 9
0.0
100. 6
144. 7
82. 5
82. 5
52.539.24 62.7
1
C
•
r
FINANCE-FA454 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
TIME 08:30:30
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0045
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89
DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.
160 SEWER FUND
DEPARTMENT TOTAL 140, 949.00 10, 021.79 87. 360.79 1,048.97 52, 539.24 62.7
8404 CIP 85-404
DEPT: SANITARY SEWER
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
8405 CIP 86-405
0. 00 0. 00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
DEPT: SANITARY SEWER
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
1, 089. 000. 00
1. 089, 000. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
1, 089, 000. 00 0. 00
8406 CIP 88-406 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
484, 000. 00
484. 000. 00
0.00
0.00
484. 000. 00 0. 00
8407 CIP 88-407 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
50. 000. 00
50. 000. 00
50. 000. 00
1, 623, 000. 00
1, 818. 478. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
O: 00
12, 009. 79.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00 0. 00
15, 258. 88
15, 258. 88
57. 10
57. 10
15, 315. 98
4. 700. 64
4. 700. 64
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 0
0. 0
0. 00 0. 0
1, 073, 741. 12
1, 073. 741. 12
1. 4
1. 4
57. 10- 0. 0
57. 10- 0. 0
0. 00 1, 073, 684. 02 1. 4
0.00
0.00
4. 700. 64 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00
20. 016. 62
155, 943. 41
0. 00
0. 00
1, 048. 97
479. 299. 36
479. 299. 36
0. 9
0. 9
479, 299.36 0.9
50, 000. 00
50. 000. 00
50, 000. 00
1.602, 983. 38
1.661. 485. 62
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
1.2
8. 6
F I NANC E-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND
1299 BUDGET TRANSFER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0046
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
2103 SPEC INVESTGTNS
65. 309. 00
65. 309. 00
65. 309. 00
65. 309. 00
DEPT: POLICE
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY
4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY
4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME
4187 UNIFORMS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4304 TELEPHONE
4322 UNCLASSIFIED
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
5400 EQUIPMENT
5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *500
5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
6900 LEASE PAYMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
47, 428. 00
0. 00
3. 520. 00
0. 00
934. 00
51. 882. 00
2, 000.00
2. 000. 00
1, 440. 00
2, 000. 00
3. 440. 00
0. 00
14. 215. 00
14. 215. 00
7, 560. 00
7. 560. 00
79, 097. 00
79, 097. 00
144. 406. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
5. 326. 00
5. 326. 00
5. 326. 00
5. 326. 00
0. 00
5. 076. 00
110. 00
254. 40
87. 51
5. 527. 91
1, 200. 00
1. 200. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
499. 49
7, 231. 35
7, 730. 84
1, 200. 00
1. 200. 00
15. 658. 75
15, 658. 75
20. 984. 75
49. 330. 00
49. 330. 00
49, 330. 00
49, 330. 00
. 0. 00
5. 076. 00
110. 00
254. 40
87. 51
5. 527. 91
2.400.00
2. 400. 00
0. 00
1. 474. 00
1, 474. 00
499. 49
7. 231. 35
7. 730. 84
1, 200. 00
1. 200. 00
18, 332. 75
18. 332. 75
67, 662. 75
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
15, 979. 00
15, 979. 00
15. 979. 00
15, 979. 00
75. 5
75. 5
75. 5
75. 5
0. 00 47, 428. 00 0. 0
0. 00 5, 076. 00- 0. 0
0. 00 3, 410. 00 3. 1
0.00 254.40- 0.0
0.00 846.49 9.3
0. 00 46, 354. 09 10. 6
0.00 400.00- 120.0
0.00 400.00- 120.0
0. 00 1, 440. 00 0. 0
0.00 526.00 73.7
0. 00 1. 966. 00 42. 8
0.00 499.49- 0.0
6, 681. 26 302. 39 97. 8
6, 681.26 197. 10- 101. 3
0. 00 6, 360. 00 15. 8
0. 00 6. 360. 00 15. 8
6. 681. 26 54. 082. 99 31. 6
6. 681.26 54. 082. 99 31. 6
6. 681.26 70. 061. 99 51. 4
•
•
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0047'
g TIME 08:30:30 FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
v.
180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND
2202 HYDRANT UPGRADE
DEPT: FIRE
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
109, 700. 00
109, 700. 00
109. 700. 00
109, 700. 00
109. 700. 00
0. 00
0. 00
9. 00
0.00
0.00
2. 400. 00
2. 400. 00
2.400.00
2. 400. 00
2. 400. 00
54. 920. 00
54. 920. 00
54. 920. 00
54. 920. 00
54, 920. 00
52. 380. 00
52, 380. 00
52. 2
52. 2
52, 380.00 52.2
52, 380.00 52.2
52. 380.00 52.2
0
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08: 30: 30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
705 INSURANCE FUND
1209 LIABILITY INS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0048
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4180 RETIREMENT
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4315 MEMBERSHIP
4316 TRAINING
4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE
4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
15. 889. 00
382. 00
382. 00
2. 434. 00
2. 444. 00
21, 531.00
282. 056. 00
282, 056. 00
500. 00
250. 00
200. 00
300. 00
30. 000. 00
31. 250. 00
MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.
1. 499. 74
0. 00
322. 08
110. 34
120. 82
2, 052. 98
19. 391. 50
19. 391. 50
0. 00
0. 00
99. 00
0. 00
5, 201. 40
5. 300. 40
334.837.00 26.744.88
1210 AUTO/PROP/BONDS DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 39, 025. 00 27. 242. 37
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 39. 025. 00 27, 242. 37
DIVISION TOTAL 39, 025. 00 27, 242. 37
1215 UNEMPLOYMENT DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4186 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 50, 000. 00 3. 391.99
OBJECT SUBTOTAL 50, 000. 00 3. 391. 99
DIVISION TOTAL 50. 000. 00 3. 391. 99
1217 WORKERS COMP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 20, 891. 00 1, 927. 26
10, 533. 89
0. 00
1, 017. 62
877. 21
934. 03
13, 362. 75
272, 305. 25
272. 305. 25
157. 32
66. 00
285. 00
0. 00
29. 733. 13
30, 241. 45
315. 909. 45
58, 613. 82
58. 613. 82
58, 613. 82
28, 251.31
28. 251. 31
28, 251. 31
ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
12, 992. 46 0. 00
5. 355. 11
382. 00
635. 62-
1. 556. 79
1, 509. 97
8, 168. 25
9. 750. 75
9, 750. 75
342. 68
184. 00
85. 00-
300. 00
266. 87
1. 008. 55
18, 927. 55
19, 588. 82-
19, 588. 82-
66. 2
0. 0
266. 3
36. 0
38. 2
62. 0
96. 5
96. 5
31. 4
26. 4
142. 5
0. 0
99. 1
96. 7
94. 3
150. 1
150. 1
19, 588. 82- 150. 1
21, 748.69
21, 748. 69
56. 5
56. 5
21, 748. 69 56. 5
7,898.54 62. 1
0
•
3
1
FINANCE-FA454
TIME 08:30:30
FUND DIV OBJT DESCR
705 INSURANCE FUND
1217 WORKERS COMP
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0049
FROM 03/01/89 TO 03/31/89 DATE 04/19/89
75.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE
APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE
DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF
4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN
4180 RETIREMENT
4182 WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR
4183 WORKERS COMP PRIOR YR
4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4200 CONTRACT SERVICES
4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER
4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
4316 TRAININQ
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
501. 00
501.00
3, 042. 00
210, 675. 00
0. 00
3. 622. 00
239. 232. 00
42. 291. 00
42, 291. 00
200. 00
265. 00
465. 00
DIVISION TOTAL 281, 988. 00
1218 MEDICARE DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT
4100 PERSONAL SERVICES
4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS
OBJECT SUBTOTAL
DIVISION TOTAL
DEPARTMENT TOTAL
FUND TOTAL
REPORT TOTALS
0. 00
322. 08
164. 42
31, 507. 16
0. 00
210. 16
34. 131. 08
3, 066. 00
3. 066. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
37. 197. 08
24. 000. 00 2, 308. 08
24. 000. 00 2. 308. 08
0. 00
1,017.46
1, 155. 66
106. 182. 44
0. 00
1:621.64 u
122, 969. 66
42, 967. 00
42, 967. 00
46. 22
43. 99
90. 21
166. 026. 87
17, 005. 86
17, 005. 86
24, 000. 00 2, 308. 08 17, 005. 86
729, 850. 00 96. 884. 40 585. 807. 31
729, 850. 00 96, 884. 40 585, 807. 31
18. 495, 250. 90 1, 236, 811. 41 10. 849, 433. 45
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
501. 00
516. 46-
1. 886. 34
104. 492. 56
0. 00
2. 000. 36
116, 262. 34
676. 00-
676. 00-
153. 78
221. 01
374. 79
0. 00 115, 961. 13
0. 00 6, 994. 14
0. 00 6. 994. 14
0. 00 6. 994. 14
0. 00 144, 042. 69
0. 00 144, 042. 69
154. 668. 97 7. 491, 148. 48
0. 0
203. 0
37. 9
50. 4
0. 0
44. 7
51. 4
101. 5
101. 5
23. 1
16. 6
19. 4
58. 8
70. 8
70. 8
70. 8
B0. 2
80. 2
59. 4
•
•
CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - MARCH 1989
FUND
NUMBER
001
105
110
115
120
125
126
127
130
140
145
150
155
160
170
180
705
GENERAL
ACCOUNT
3/1/89
BALANCE
CASH ADJUSTMENTS
WARRANTS
ADJUSTMENTS
3/31/89
BALANCE
GENERAL
LIGHTING DISTRICT
PARKING
STATE GAS TAX
COUNTY GAS TAX
PARK REC.FAC.TAX
RAILROAD RT.OF WAY
6% UTILITY USERS TAX
REVENUE SHARING
CDBG
PROPOSITION A FUND
GRANT FUND
$2,621,683.81
1,272,376.52
44,325.59
366,722.35
35,484.16
593,905.69
1,172,293.24
87,038.11
5,905.80
-0-
277,236.43
80,887.24
CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT 33,105.59
SEWER MAINTENANCE 1,397,526.57
POLICE ASSET SEIZURE 206,041.19
FIRE PROTECTION FUND 183,490.19
SELF INSURANCE FUND 710,635.85
$9,088,658.33
$ 549,452.66
-0-
369,969.67
46,265.40
-0-
39,204.00
70,325.45
105,488.18
-0-
-0-
21,588.00
-0-
-0-
5,746.92
6,140.77
12,471 .00
7,440.00
$1,234,092.05
$181,557.26
14,539.99
506.53
9,151.69
405.49
6,786.81
13,596.29
994.62
67.49
-0-
3,889.20
7,725.33
378.31
82,874.71
2,354.52
6,263.82
24,277.74
$355,369.80
$ 775,567.65
24,640.48
71,945.25
2,746.05
- 0-
899.14
- 0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
2,384.09
449.70
3,464.18
10,039.60
3,170.25
-0-
90,045.66
$ 985,352.05
TRUST
ACCOUNTS
PAYROLL
BALANCE
RECEIVED PAID
BALANCE
$123,476.63
2,744.58
118,485.32
6,354.00
-0-
-0-
-0-
86,829.00
1,590.00
-0-
-0-
-0-
375.00
2,050.43
12,286.59
-0-
-0-
$354,191.55
STATEMENT
BALANCE
$2,453,649.45
1,259,531.45
224,371.22
413,039.39
35,889.65
638,997.36
1,256,214.98
106,691.91
4,383.29
-0-
300,329.54
88,162.87
29,644.72
1,474,058.17
199,079.64
202,225.01
652,307.93
$9,338,576.58
$9,221,633.12
INACTIVE DEPOSIT
$443,299.84
INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE
$3,504.04
$512,449.50
$512,816.79 $3,136.75
GARY BRUTCH, CI Y TREASURER
APRIL 20, 1989
GENERAL $ 231,186.38
PAYROLL <1,759.67>
229,426.71
109,346.50
120,080.21
INACTIVE DEPOSIT 9,221,633.12
BALANCE 9,341,713.33
OUTSTANDING CHECKS
April 11, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council April 25, 1989
HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1989-1990 ADOPTION OF
RESOLUTIONS REGARDING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SETTING JUNE 13,
1989 FOR A PUBLIC HEARING.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 89- , a resolution of the City
Council approving the report of the Director of Public Works of
said City made pursuant to the requirements of Resolution No.'
89-5240.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 89- , a resolution of intent to order
certain street lighting fixtures and appurtenances to be
installed and maintained and electric current to be furnished for
street lighting fixtures throughout the City for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1990; and setting a
public hearing for June 13, 1989, to accept public input on the
matter of the proposed Street Lighting District.
Background:
On March 14, 1989 City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-5240
ordering the preparation of a report for the formation of the
Hermosa Beach Street Lighting District No. 1989-1990.
Analysis:
Adoption of both resolutions is necessary at this time so that a
public hearing can be held to take testimony on the assessments.
Resolution (Attachment 1) approves the report of the Director of
Public Works prepared by the City's Street Lighting Assessment
Engineer. It adoption confirms that the report has been prepared
prior to the public hearing. This report covers matters relating
to the proposed Street Lighting Maintenance District and is on
file in the Office of the City Clerk.
The adoption of the second resolution (Attachment 2) provides for
the setting of a public hearing for June 13, 1989 at 8:00 pm (or
as soon as possible thereafter). At the conclusion of the public
hearing on June 13, 1989, the City Council will be provided with
a resolution it may adopt concerning the assessment district.
Should there be any questions regarding these matters, the
Director of Public Works and Mr. Patrick N. Rossetti, the City's
Assessment Engineer, will be present.
1
IMO
1e
Alternatives:
Other Alternatives available to Council are:
1. Let the district lapse; thereby, causing a potential
increased General Fund obligation of approximately $352,288.50.
Respectfully submitted,
Anthony Antich
Director of Pub is Works
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Finance Administrator
Concur:
evin B. Nor hcraft
City Manager
Attachments: Resolution NO. 89- , Approval of Report
Resolution NO. 89- , Setting the Public Hearing
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
OF SAID CITY MADE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION NO.
89-5240 OF SAID COUNCIL.
HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1989-1990
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach,
California, did in Resolution No. 89-5240, adopted March 14, 1989
pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972", of the State of California (Part 2 of Division 15,
Section 22500, et seq. of the Streets and Highways Code of the
State of California), did require the Director of Public Works to
make and file with the Clerk of the City Council a report in
writing, presenting certain matters relating to the proposed
installation of certain street lighting fixtures and
appurtenances and the proposed maintenance thereof, including the
maintenance of all fixtures and appurtenances throughout the City
as contemplated under the provisions of said "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972";_and
WHEREAS, said Director of Public Works, pursuant to the
requirements of said City Council as expressed in Resolution No.
89-5240, and of said law, did make and on the 18th day of April,
1989 file in the Office of the City Clerk (who is ex -officio
Clerk of the City Council of said City), his report in writing
responsive to the requirements of said Resolution No. 89-5240,
and of said law referred to in said Resolution No. 89-5240, and
as contemplated under the provisions of said "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972"; and
WHEREAS, said City Clerk has presented the said report to the
City Council of said City, and said Council has proceeded to
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
carefully examine, inspect and consider the said report and is
satisfied with said report and with each and all of the items
therein set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the report of the Director of Public Works
in the City of Hermosa Beach, California, bearing the date the
18th day of April, 1989 which said report was prepared and filed
pursuant to the requirements of the provisions of Resolution No.
89-5240 of the City Council of said City and in conformity with
the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972",
(Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the
State of California), and which said report was filed in the
Office of the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, California
on the 18th day of April 1989, be and the same is hereby approved
as so prepared, presented and filed.
SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the same to be
entered among the original resolutions of the City Council of
said City and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption
thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of
said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is
passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 25th day of April 1989
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED S 0 FORM
trTiATTORNEY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN STREET
LIGHTING FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES TO BE INSTALLED AND
MAINTAINED AND ELECTRIC CURRENT TO BE FURNISHED FOR STREET
LIGHTING FIXTURES THROUGHOUT THE CITY, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
BEGINNING JULY 1, 1989 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1990; AND APPOINTING A
TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN RELATION THERETO.
HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1989-1990
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the public interest and convenience require,
and that it is the intention of the City Council of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California, to order certain street lighting
fixtures and appurtenances as show in DIAGRAM and PLAN No.
1989-1990 and SPECIFICATIONS NO. 1989-1990 on file in the Office
of the City Clerk to be provided and installed and maintained;
and that electric current be furnished for street lighting
fixtures and appurtenances throughout the City for the fiscal
year beginning July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1990.
All of the work and improvements above specified shall be
done in accordance with Specification and Plans therefor referred
to in the Report of the Director of Public Works dated April 18,
1989, on file in the office of the City Clerk and which is hereby
referred to and by this reference incorporated herein and made a
part hereof.
SECTION 2. To expedite the making of said improvement, the
City Council may at any time transfer into the "Hermosa Beach
Street Lighting District No. 1988-1989 Fund", out of any money in
the General Fund, any sums as it shall deem necessary, and the
sums so transferred shall be deemed a loan to such fund, and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
shall be repaid out of the proceeds of the assessments provided
for in this resolution (within the same fiscal year) and pursuant
to the provisions of Section 22657 of the California Streets and
Highways Code, "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" referred to
herein.
SECTION 3. That said contemplated service, in the opinion of
the City Council, is of more than local or
said City Council hereby makes the expense,
chargeable upon a district,
which district
ordinary benefit, and
of said service
said Council hereby
declares to be the district benefited by said work and improve-
ment, and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof.
Said district is all of the City of Hermosa Beach as shown on
DIAGRAM and PLAN NO. 1989-1990 on file in the Office of the City
Clerk, on which exterior boundaries thereof are described as the
boundary lines of the said City, excepting from said district any
portion of any public street or alley which may be included
therein. Reference is hereby made to the said DIAGRAM and PLAN
for a complete and detailed description of said district. The
said DIAGRAM and PLAN so on file shall govern for all details as
to the extent of said assessment district.
SECTION 4. Any lots or parcels of land known as public
property, as the same is defined in Section 22663, Part 2,
Division 15, Streets and Highways Code, (Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972), herein after referred to, which are included in the
said assessment district, shall be omitted and exempt from the
assessment to be made to cover the costs and expenses of said
contemplated improvemment.
SECTION 5. The improvement contemplated by this Resolution
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
of Intention shall be done under the provisions of the
"Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972". (Now part 2 of Division
15, Section 22500 et. seq. of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California).
SECTION 6. That Tuesday, June 13, 1989 at the hour of 8:00
p.m. of the said day be and the same is hereby appointed as the
time, and the City Council Chamber in the City of Hermosa Beach,
California is hereby appointed as the place for hearing protests
as to the question of approving and confirming the assessment
district and the levying of the proposed assessment, in reference
to said improvement.
SECTION 7. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized,
designated and directed to give notice of said hearing in time,
form and manner as required by law.
SECTION 8. That the EASY READER, a weekly newspaper of
general circulation., circulated within the said City of Hermosa
Beach, California, is hereby designated as the newspaper in which
said notice shall be published.
SECTION 9. That this Resolution shall take effect
immediately; and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the original of the same
to be entered among the original resolutions of the City Council
of said City and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption
thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of
said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is
passed and adopted.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11/
12'-
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 25th day of April, 1989
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
T
City Clerk
City Attorney
April 11, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council April 25, 1989
HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1989-1990
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS REGARDING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND
SETTING JUNE 13, 1989 FOR A PUBLIC HEARING
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council:
1. Adopt the attached Resolution No. 89- , a resolution of
the City Council approving the report of the Director of Public
Works of said City made pursuant to the requirements of
Resolution No. 89-5241.
2. Adopt the attached Resolution No. 89- , a resolution of
intent to order certain Crossing Guard Services pursuant to the
"Crossing Guard Maintenance District Act of 1974", Chapter 3.5,
Articles 2, 3, and 4, Sections 55530 through 55570 of the
Government Code of the State of California, at certain locations
in the said City for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989
through June 30, 1990; and appointing a time and place for a
public hearing in relation thereto.
Background:
On March 14, 1989 City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-5241,
ordering the preparation of a report for the formation of the
Hermosa Beach Crossing Guard Maintenance District No. 1989-1990.
Analysis:
Adoption of both resolutions is necessary at this time so that a
public hearing can be held to take testimony on the assessments.
Resolution (Attachment 1) approves the report of the Director of
Public Works prepared by the City's Crossing Guard Assessment
Engineer. Its adoption confirms that the report has been
prepared prior to the public hearing. This report has the
estimated assessment for the proposed Crossing Guard Maintenance
District and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
The adoption of the second resolution (Attachment 2) provides for
the setting of a public hearing for June 13, 1989, at 8:00 pm (or
as soon as possible thereafter) to accept public input on the
matter of the proposed Crossing Guard Maintenance District and
assessment. At the conclusion of the public hearing on June 13,
1989 the City Council will be provided with a resolution it may
adopt concerning the assessment district. Should there be any
questions regarding these matters, the Director of Public Works
and Mr. Patrick N. Rossetti, the City's Assessment Engineer will
be present.
11'
Alternatives:
Another alternative available to City Council is:
1. Let the district lapse; thereby, causing a. potential
increased General Fund obligation of approximately $58,600.
Respectfully submitted,
A1
Ant •n Antich
Director of Pu.lic Works
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Finance Administrator
Concur:
even B. Nort•iraft
City Manager
Attachments: Resolution No. 89- , Approval of Report
Resolution No. 89- , Setting of Public Hearing
cg/pwadmin
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,.
CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
OF SAID CITY MADE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION NO.
89-5241 OF SAID COUNCIL.
HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1989-1990
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach,
California, did in Resolution No. 89-5241, adopted March 14, 1989
pursuant to the provisions of the "Crossing Guard Maintenance
District Act of 1974", Chapter 3.5, Article 2, 3, and 4, Sections
55530 through 55570 of the Government Code of the State of
California, did require the Director of Public Works to make and
file with the Clerk of the City Council a report in writing,
presenting certain matters relating to the proposed "Crossing
Guard Maintenance District Act of 1974"; and
WHEREAS, said Director of Public Works, pursuant to the
requirements of said City Council as expressed in Resolution No.
89-5241, and of said law, did make and on the 18th day of April,
1989 file in the Office of the City Clerk (who is ex -officio
Clerk of the City Council of said City), his report in writing
responsive to the requirements of said Resolution No. 89-5241,
and of said law referred to in said Resolution No. 89-5241, and
as contemplated under the provisions of said "Crossing Guard
Maintenance District Act of 1974"; and
WHEREAS, said City Clerk has presented the said report to the
City Council of said City, and said Council has proceeded to
carefully examine, inspect and consider the said report and is
satisfied with said report and with each and all of the items
therein set forth;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the report of the Director of Public Works
in the City of Hermosa Beach, California, bearing the date the
18th day of April, 1989 which said report was prepared and filed
pursuant to the requirements of the provisions of Resolution No.
89-5241 of the City Council'of said City and in conformity with
the provisions of the "Crossing Guard Maintenance District Act of
1974", (Chapter 3.5, Articles 2, 3, and 4, Sections 55530 through
55570 of the Government Code of the State of
which said report was filed in the Office of
the City of Hermosa Beach, California on the
1989, be and the same is
presented and filed.
SECTION 2. That the
California), and
the City Clerk of
18th day of
hereby approved as so prepared,
April
City Clerk shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the same to be
entered among the original resolutions of the City Council of
said City and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption
thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of
said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is
passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 25th day of April 1989
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AST FORM:
e
Y ATTORNEY
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN CROSSING
.GUARD SERVICES PURSUANT TO THE "CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT ACT OF 1974", CHAPTER 3.5, ARTICLES 2, 3, AND 4, SECTION
55530 THROUGH 55570, OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AT CERTAIN LOCATIONS IN THE SAID CITY, FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1989 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1990; AND APPOINTING
A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN RELATION THERETO.
HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1989-1990
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the public interest and convenience require,
and that it is the intention of the City Council of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California, to order certain Crossing Guard
Maintenance Services, as show in DIAGRAM and PLAN No. 1989-1990
on file in the Office of the City Clerk to be provided and
maintained at certain street crossings throughout the City for
the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1990.
All of the services above specified shall be done in
accordance with Specification and Plans therefor referred to in
the Report of the Director of Public Works dated April 18, 1989,
on file in the office of the City Clerk and which is hereby
referred to and by this reference incorporated herein and made a
part hereof.
SECTION 2. To expedite the making of said improvement, the
City Council may at any time transfer into the "Hermosa Beach
Crossing Guard Maintenance District No. 1988-1989 Fund", out of
any money in the General Fund, any sums as it shall deem
necessary, and the sums so transferred shall be deemed a loan to
such fund, and shall be repaid out of the proceeds of the
s
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
assessments provided for in this resolution (within the same
fiscal year) and pursuant to the provisions of Section 55561 of
the Crossing Guard Maintenance District Act of 1974.
SECTION 3. That said contemplated service, in the opinion of
the City Council, is of more than local or ordinary benefit, and
said City Council hereby makes the expense of said service
chargeable upon a district, which district said Council hereby
declares to be the district benefited by said Crossing Guard
Services, and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses
thereof. Said district is all of the City of Hermosa Beach as
shown on DIAGRAM and PLAN NO. 1989-1990 on file in the Office of
the City Clerk, on which exterior boundaries thereof are
described as the boundary lines of the said City, excepting from
said district any portion of any public street or alley which may
be included therein. Reference is hereby made to the said
DIAGRAM and PLAN for a complete and detailed description of said
district. The said DIAGRAM and PLAN so on file shall govern for
all details as to the extent of said assessment district.
SECTION 4. The Council of the City of Hermosa Beach,
California, shall levy an annual special assessment to pay the
costs of maintaining said Crossing Guards. The annual assessment
shall be levied and collected at the same time and in the same
manner and with the same interest and penalties as general taxes
of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. (Said taxes as
collected by the Los Angeles County Tax Collector for the City of
Hermosa Beach.)
SECTION 5. Any lots or parcels of land known as public
f
property, as the same is defined in Section 55560 of said
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Crossing Guard Maintenance Act of 1974, hereinafter referred to
which are included in the said assessment district, shall be
omitted and exempt from the assessment to be made to cover the
costs and expenses of said contemplated improvement.
SECTION 6. The improvement contemplated by this Resolution
of Intention shall be done under the provisions of the "Crossing
Guard Maintenance District Act of 1974", Chapter 3.5, Articles 2,
3 and 4, Sections 55530 through 55570 of the Government Code of
the State of California.
SECTION 7. That Tuesday, June 13, 1989 at the hour of 8:00
p.m. of the said day be and the same is hereby appointed as the
time, and the City Council Chamber in the City of Hermosa Beach,
California is hereby appointed as the place for hearing protests
as to the question of approving and confirming the assessment
district and the levying of the proposed assessment, in reference
to said improvement.
SECTION 8. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized,
designated and directed to give notice of said hearing in time,
form and manner as required by law.
SECTION 9. That the EASY READER, a weekly newspaper of
general circulation, circulated within the said City.of Hermosa
Beach, California, is hereby designated as the newspaper in which
said notice shall be published.
SECTION 10. That this Resolution shall take effect
immediately; and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the original of the same
to be entered among the original resolutions of the City Council
of said City and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14%
15�
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of
said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is
passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 25th day of April, 1989
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
, City Clerk
APPROVED AS T4 FORM:
, City Attorney
Honorable Mayor and Members of
the Hermosa Beach City Council
April 11, 1989
Regular Meeting of
April 25, 1989
STATUS OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
THIRD QUARTER REPORT
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council receive and file this report.
Background:
The FY88-89 Capital Improvement budget is $3,583,640. It is
projected that by June 30, 1989, $2,360,379 will be expended. This
represents 66% of the total budget. Less than 100% of the projects
will be completed during the Fiscal Year due to:
1. Staffing level (since July, 1988, have been unable to fill
engineering vacancy);
2. Rejection of bids by City Council and re -advertising;
3. Outside agency review.
There are 28 projects in the budget. Activity is in progress on 18
and 10 projects have been completed.
Analysis:
Below is a detailed description of the progress.
CIP 85-102
Description:
Street and Safety Improvements
FAU, Widen Highland Ave., from Longfellow to
35th Street
This project proposes to widen Highland Avenue from
30' to 40'; thereby, providing an 8' parking lane on
each side of the street.
Status: In progress. Anticipate construction to start May
1989.
Budget $118,800
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 7,601
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $111,140
CIP 85-137 FAU, Valley/Ardmore at Gould Avenue
Description: This project proposes to overlay Valley/Ardmore at
the Gould intersection.
lg
Status: In progress. FHWA (Federal Highway
Administration) has approved the project.
Awaiting assignment of funds agreement due in May
1989. This project to be combined with CIP
88-173 (AC overlay for portions of
Valley/Ardmore).
Budget $72,600
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 3,759
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $ 3,759
CIP 85-138 FAU, Traffic Signal Improvements
Description: This project proposes traffic signal upgrade
and/or installation at 2nd, llth, 13th and Pier
Avenue at Hermosa Avenue, and Prospect Avenue at
Aviation Boulevard; and a street lighting upgrade
at Pier Avenue/Valley/Ardmore.
Status: Project Complete. Scheduled for Council
acceptance as complete on May 9, 1989.
Budget $191,400
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 5,398
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $152,298
CIP 85-160
Description:
Status:
Roadway Improvements & Appurtenances
This on-going project consists of repairing
damaged concrete streets City-wide.
In progress. Proposals are due on January 9,
1989 for engineering services to determine
repairs for concrete streets City-wide.
Scheduled for award by Council during May 1989.
No further expenditures anticipated this fiscal
year.
Budget $132,600
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 38,471
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $ 38,471
CIP 87-165
Description:
Status:
Hermosa Beach Miscellaneous Bikeway Construction
This project repaired the bike path wall on
Hermosa Avenue between 28th Street and 35th
Street.
Project Complete.
Budget $19,351
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $13,994
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $13,994
2
CIP 87-170 Street Sealing
Description: This project consists of slurry sealing of
various streets City-wide to increase skid
resistance and prolong pavement life.
Status: Project Complete. Scheduled for Council
acceptance on May 9, 1989.
Budget $137,500
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 2,524
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $137,500
CIP 87-171 Asphalt Street Repairs
Description: This on-going project consists of repairing
damaged asphaltic streets City-wide. Streets
east of Ardmore were repaired prior to slurry
sealing.
Status: In progress. Proposals are due on January 9,
1989 for engineering services to determine
repairs for asphalt street repairs west of
Valley. Scheduled for award by Council during
May 1989.
Budget $149,755
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 60,362
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $149,755
CIP 88-173 AC Overlay for Portions of Valley/Ardmore
Description: Preparation of plans, specifications and
estimates leading to the resurfacing of portions
of Valley Drive/Ardmore and Pier Avenue.
Status: In progress. FHWA (Federal Highway
Administration) has approved the project.
Awaiting assignment of funds agreement due in May
1989. This project to be combined with CIP
85-137 FAU, Valley/Ardmore at Gould.
Budget $132,000
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ -0-
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $132,000
CIP 88-174 AC Overlay for Portions of Prospect Avenue
Description: Preparation of plans, specifications and
estimates leading to the resurfacing of Prospect
Avenue.
Status:
In progress. FHWA (Federal Highway
Administration) has approved the project.
Working to include with Los Angeles County
Improvement Program.
Budget $132,000
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989$ -0-
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $132,000
CIP 86-176 Traffic Control Pre-emption
Description: This project will install traffic control
pre-emption devices on all PCH signals at 2nd,
5th, 8th, and 21st Streets, and Aviation and
Artesia Boulevards.
Status: In progress. Design plans and specifications are
complete.
Bid opening scheduled for April 27, 1989.
Budget $40,200
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 2,556
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $20,200
4
CIP 85-201
Desctription:
Status:
Street Lighting Improvements
Light Conversion and New Installations
This project proposes the installation, upgrading
and conversion to high pressure sodium lights
throughout the City.
In progress. Pacific Coast Highway and Herondo
Street completed. North Strand next scheduled
for change out.
Budget $44,000
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $10,270
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $24,000
CIP 85-202
Description:
Status:
Hermosa Avenue/Pier Avenue Lighting
Replace lighting poles on Pier Avenue form
Hermosa Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway.
In progress. The street light poles for Pier
Avenue have been ordered. Installation is
expected to begin in April 1989 and the work will
be performed by the Street Lighting Division of
the Public Works Department.
Budget $49,500
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $17,880
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $25,000
CIP 85-203
Description:
Status:
Pier Lighting Grounding
This project consisted of electrical grounding of
Pier infra -structure (railing to ocean floor).
Project complete.
Budget $27,500
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 620
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $ 620
Sewers/Storm Drains
CIP 87-302 Beach Drive Improvements
Description: This project proposes to install a new storm
drain, replace sanitary sewer and resurface
street on Beach Drive from 6th to 10th Streets.
Status: Project complete.
Budget $ 64,896
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 39,201
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $ 40,000
CIP 86-405 Replacement and Upsizing of Sanitary Sewer Lines
City wide - Target Area 3
Description: Preparation of plans and specifications completed
leading to construction and completion of
deficiencies of sanitary sewer lines.
Status: In progress. Design completed by Harris &
Associates for $54,150. Construction bid awarded
on December 13, 1988 to Colich & Sons for
$680,845. Work in progress.
Budget $1,089,000
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 15,000
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $ 800,000
CIP 88-406 Sanitary Sewer Improvements, Target Area 4
Description: Preparation of plans and specifications leading
to construction and completion of deficiencies of
sanitary sewers in Target Area 4.
Status: In progress. City Council awarded design
agreement January 10,1989.
Budget $484,000
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 4,700
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $100,000
CIP 88-407 Sanitary Sewer Bond Issue
Description: Preliminary engineering leading to a $5 to $10
million bond issue.
Status: In progress. Work to begin during second quarter
1989.
Budget $50,000
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ -0-
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $20,000
7
Park Improvements
CIP 85-502 Park Development on Prospect Avenue (Edith Rodaway
Friendship Park)
Description: This project installed a park at the
intersections of Hollowell and Gentry with
Prospect Avenue.
Status: Project complete.
Budget $5,500
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 -0-
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $ -0-
CIP 86-506 Various Park Improvements
Description: New tree planting, benches, landscaping,
irrigation purchases, trash can, playground
equipment, picnic tables, etc. for Community
Resources Commission recommended locations.
Status: In Progress.
Budget $10,000
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 9,952
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $10,000
CIP 87-507 Clark Field Tennis Court Resurfacing
Description: This project proposed to resurface the two tennis
courts at Clark Field.
Status: Project complete.
Budget $ 5,100
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 -0-
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 -0-
CIP 87-508 Park Irrigation Restoration
Description: Restoration of various City Park irrigation
systems.
Status: In progress. Council to award Inventory and
Assessment Agreement on April 11, 1989.
Budget $121,000
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 2,950
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $ 40,000
CIP 86-601
Description:
Status:
Public Buildings and Grounds
City Fuel Dispensing Equipment
This project supplied and installed electronic
fuel dispensing system for inventory and billing
control of gasoline dispensed to City vehicles at
City Yard and brought existing City Yard gasoline
dispensation into conformance with State law.
This year, per law, the tanks were tested.
Project complete.
Budget $ 3,000
Estimated Expenditures as of February 28, 1989 $ 3,000
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $ 3,000
CIP 86-602
Description:
Status:
Electrical Upgrade at City Hall
Upgrade the electrical capacity of City Hall
Buildings including computer room. Also included
installation of emergency back up generator.
Project complete.
Budget $88,298
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $43,000
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $43,000
CIP 86-604
Description:
Status:
Building Improvements at Various Locations
This project proposes construction of Capital
Improvements for the following departments:
1. General Services
2. Fire Department
3. Police Department
4. Building Department
5. Community Center
In progress.
6. Public Works
7. City Hall - general
8. Planning Department
9. Council Chambers
Budget.... $40,150
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $16,000
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $40,150
CIP 87-606
Description:
Status:
Police Department Remodel
Demolition and modification of part of existing
Police facility, remodel of dispatching center.
Project Complete.
9
Budget $109,024
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 75,000
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $ 75,000
CIP 88-610 Community Center Air Conditioning
Description: Proposes installation of air conditioning in
Community Center Theater.
Status: In progress. Installation scheduled for April 1989.
Contract awarded to Los Angeles Air Conditioning on
October 11, 1988 at a cost not to exceed $74,400.
Budget $94,974
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 2,739
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $85,000
CIP 88-612 City -Wide Signs
Description: This proposes to design and install uniform entryway,
directional and park signs City-wide.
Status: In progress. Directional signage at City Hall
purchased - to be installed.
Budget $10,000
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 1,880
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $ 2,000
CIP 88-614 Pier Storm Damage
Description: This project proposes to assess damage, design
repairs or reconstruction and the repair of or
reconstruction of any damage to the Hermosa Beach
Municipal Pier caused by the January 17, 1988 storm.
Status: In progress. Repair contract awarded January 24,
1989.
Budget $161,492
Estimated Expenditure as of February 28, 1989 $ 16,597
Anticipated Expenditure by June 30, 1989 $161,492
Res,• - �� ful submit
_, ,[1.►amu I
Anthony Antich
Director of Pub is Works
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
Viki\Copeland
Finan Administrator
cip
pwadmin
Kevin B. North raft
City Manager
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
• CLAIMS FOR -DAMAGES
April 18, 1989
City Council Meeting
April 25, 1989
The following claim(s) have been submitted to the City Clerk's
office:
Frank & Betty Fouce - 2930 The Strand, Hermosa Beach,
filed April 11, 1989; alleged damages due to failure of
City to issue a building permit.
Recommendation:
To deny claim(s) and refer to City's Claims Administrator.
Note: The above claim(s) are available for review in the office
of the City Clerk.
Concur:
EV N . NORT. FT, City Manager
eeeitiedfOleititae‘
KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk
CLAIM NO.:
LIABILITY
L__ CITY CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PROP
COPIES TO: C/�/�I.
.
• MAIL TO:
City Clerk
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
.
1. Claims for death.injury to persons, or to personal property, must be filed not later than six (6) months atter
(Gov. Code. Sec. 911.2).
2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than one (1) year atter the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec.911.2).
3. Read entire claim before filing.
4. Attach separate sheets, if necessary. to give full details.
Name of Claimant (first, Last, Middle)
Frank L. Fouce and Betty L. Fouce
Home Address o1 Claimant (Street. City, State, Zip)
2930 Strand, Hermosa Beach, .CA
Age
Telephone No.
Telephone No.
013 )680-1770
Business Address of Claimant (Street. City, State, Zip)
306 W. Third Street, Los Angeles, CA 90013
Address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: 10960 Wilshire Blvd. (213) 312-0300
Terry W. Bird, Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert & Matz, 24th Fl. , Los Ancreles Cn gnn?a
Date of Damage/Loss/Injury
April 12, 1988
Time
A.M. P.M.
Place of Damage/Loss/Injury
2930 Strand Hermosa Beach, California
How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be specific)
See Attachment A
Were Police at scene?
Were Paramedics at scene?
Yes 0 NoO
Yes 0 NoO
Report No.
What particular act or omission do you claim caused the damage/losslinjury?Failure of City to stop denvincr that building
permit 20884 authorized the work being done at 2930 Strand, Hernosa Beach or failure to issue such
permits as would authorize such work, and otherwise causing the work to stop and 'remain stopped
Name of City employee(s) causing the damage/IossTnjury:Wi.11i.am Grove and Kenneth B. Northcraft
Is the total amount of your claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage, or Toss:
O less than $10,000.00 If so, state the amount more than $25,000.00 (Superior Court Jurisdiction)
O more than $10,000.00 but less than $25,000.00 (Municipal Court Jurisdiction)
How was amount of claim computed? (Be specific. List doctor bills, wage rate, repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2) estimates.
See Attachment B
Expenditures made because of damage/loss/injury (Date and Item).
THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE.
1
Expenditures made because of damage/loss/injury (Date and item)
Name and address of witness(es), doctor(s), and hospital(s)*
PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY.
For all vehicle damage claims, draw a diagram with the names of streets, and indicate place of incident by 'X' and by show-
ing house numbers or distances to street corners.
If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter 'A' location of City Vehicle and by 'B' location of yourself or your vehicle.
If Personal or property damage claim please identify location as completely as possible.
CLAIMS - OTHER
(Please draw diagram)
ir_
1 HAVE READ THE FOREGOING CLAIM AND KNOW THE CONTENTS THEREOF: AND CERTIFY THAT THE SAME IS TRUE OF MY
OWN KNOWLEDGE EXCEPT AS TO THOSE MATTERS WHICH ARE HEREIN STATED UPON MY INFORMATION AND BELIEF: AND
AS TO THOSE MATTERS I BELIEVE IT TO BE TRUE. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE
AND CORRECT.
Dated
Al2c. 7( (?1(
Signed
NOTE: PRESENTATION OF A FALSE CLAIM IS PUNISHABLE AS A FELONY (CAL. PEN. CODE 72).
ATTACHMENT A
[City Claim Reporting Form for
All Persons or Property]
How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be specific)
Claimants' reference to the Petition and Complaint in
the Writ of Mandate proceedings filed in Superior Court for the
County of Los Angeles, Case No. C 703776. Without waiving or
relinquishing any of the issues raised or facts pleaded in the
mandate proceedings, claimants submit this brief summary:
The City of Hermosa Beach issued claimants Building
Permit No. 20884. Claimants were remodeling the top floor of
their house at 2930 Strand pursuant to the Building Permit. On
April 12, 1988, a city inspector stopped at the site and stated
that the remodeling work being done was not authorized by the
Building Permit and therefore work should be stopped. Work
stopped on April 12, 1988.
On April 20, 1988, William Grove, Hermosa Beach Building
and Safety Director, wrote claimants a letter reiterating that
claimants' remodeling was not authorized by the Building Permit
and that such remodeling violated Section 306 of the City's "
zoning code. On August 2, 1988, the Planning Commission for the .
City of Hermosa Beach denied claimants' request for a
determination that the remodeling complied with the issued
Building Permit.
Because of the City's continued insistence that
completion of claimants' remodeling would be unauthorized and
illegal under S 306 of the zoning code despite the fact that such
remodeling is authorized and is lawful, claimants have been
denied occupancy of their property due to the uninhabitability of
the property during the remodeling stage and therefore have been
damaged. Claimants have been forced to seek alternative shelter.
The City's actions have also denied claimants their
rights as the holders of fee simple title to real property to
complete authorized and lawful improvements to 2930 Strand. The
cost of completing the remodeling has increased. Claimants have
thereby been damaged.
Because of the City's actions in not permitting the
authorized and lawful remodeling to be completed, claimants have
been forced to insure against waste for the benefit of mortgage
holders to 2930 Strand. Incurring such insurance costs have
damaged claimants.
Claimants have also been denied the use of and enjoyment
of 2930 Strand because of the City's actions. Claimants have
thereby been damaged.
Page 1 of 2
MAB/M17170201 ATTACHMENT A
Finally, Claimants have been unlawfully denied certain
of their real property rights and have thereby been damaged.
Claimants have hired attorneys and incurred costs in trying to
regain their rights to remodel their house on 2930 Strand.
Page 2 of 2
MAB/M17170201 ATTACHMENTA
ATTACHMENT B
(City Claim Reporting Form for
All Persons or Property]
How was.amount of claim computed? (Be specific. List doctor
bills, 'wage rate, repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2)
estimates.
Claimants compute the amount of damages based on
receipts for alternate shelter; mortgage financing estimates;
remodeling completion estimates; insurance premiums; rental value
of 2930 Strand; and bills from attorneys and surveyors. Pursuant
to Cal. Gov. Code S 910., documents evidencing damage are not
attached in order to assure that "no dollar amount shall be
included in the claim.•" Additionally, the full extent of damage
is not yet quantifiable and not all documents evidencing damages
are yet available.
If the City desires that this claim be supplemented with
those documents calculating and verifying those damages presently
quantified, please make a formal request. Claimant will arrange
to have them delivered to you.
MAB/M17170202
ATTACHMENT B
April 17, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Hermosa Beach City Council of April 25, 1988
FINAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT, 1987-88
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the
1987-88 financial statement.
BACKGROUND
A draft statement was submitted to the City Council on February
14, 1989. A draft was submitted because the auditors were still
reviewing certificates of participation for the Plaza Hermosa
Shopping Center and determining the need to include disclosures
or statements regarding the transaction in the City's financial
statement.
ANALYSIS
A11 of the numbers in the final financial statement are the same
as in the draft report submitted earlier. The staff report
submitted on February 14, 1989 remains accurate. The only
additions to the financial statement are:
1. The Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants which,
at the top of page 4, contains the first ever unqualified
opinion for the City of Hermosa Beach.
2. A statement regarding the certificates of participation at
the bottom of page 31.
The auditors recommend a periodic (every few years), independent
review of the status of the COP's. The City now receives
statements from the trustee relating to the COP's so future
reviews will be much easier to accomplish.
Concur:
even Nor craft
City Manager
Viki Copeland
Finance Administrator
11
April 17, 1989
Honorable Mayor City Council meeting
and Members of City Council of April 25, 1989
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
OF A SEISMIC HAZARD MITIGATION PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached
agreement.
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to Government Code Section 8875 et seq., all cities are
required to identify all unreinforced masonry buildings that are
potentially hazardous and to develop and implement a mitigation
program to reduce the hazard. This is to be accomplished by
January 1, 1990.
ANALYSIS
Pursuant to Section 2-62 of the municipal code, formal bidding is
not required for professional services. On an informal basis,
staff attempted, without success, to locate other firms with the
diverse background and expertise necessary to develop a seismic
hazard reduction plan.
Melvyn Green and Associates, Inc. has considerable experience and
expertise in the area of seismic safety as applied to existing
buildings. Notable projects in this field that the firm has ac-
complished include the following:
1) Prepared a. guidebook for local government implementation of
the unreinforced masonry building (URM) law for the Califor-
nia Seismic Safety Commission and gave presentations to
building and planning departments statewide.
2) Preparing seismic hazard reduction programs for the cities of
Beverly Hills, Lake Elsinore and Redlands.
3) Prepared a new code for the International Conference of
Building Officials titled the Uniform Code for Building Con-
servation including provisions for seismic requirements for
existing buildings.
Melvyn Green, principal in the firm, is a licensed structural
engineer in the State of California and a former municipal build-
ing official. Additional qualifications of the firm are contained
in their proposal.
1
lk
The cost for the preparation of the seismic hazard mitigation
program is $9,100 plus an estimated $6,520 for surveying build-
ings and reviewing records for a total cost of $15,620. Funds
have been appropriated from the general fund for FY 88/89 for
this project. Since the project will not be completed in the cur-
rent fiscal year, a portion of those funds ($10,000) is proposed
to be reappropriated in the FY 89/90 budget.
Concur:
Respectfully submitted,
William Grove
Director, Bldg. & Safety
evin B. Northp aft
City Manager
2
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
SEISMIC HAZARD MITIGATION PROGRAM
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 25th day
of April , 1989 by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a
Municipal Corporation hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and
Melvin Green & Associates, Inc. , hereinafter
referred to as "CONSULTANT".
WITNESSET H:
WHEREAS, CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to develop a
seismic hazard mitigation program in accordance with state law as
set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein
and by this reference made a part hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. CITY agrees to retain CONSULTANT to develop a seismic
hazard mitigation program as herein set forth.
2. CONSULTANT shall perform all work necessary to com-
plete in a manner satisfactory to CITY the services set forth in
Exhibit "A" entitled Proposal and attached hereto and by
reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof.
3. All information, data, reports and records and maps as
are existing and available from CITY, and necessary for carrying
out the work outlined in Exhibit "A" shall be furnished to CON-
SULTANT without charge by CITY and CITY shall cooperate in every
way reasonable in the carrying out of the work without delay.
4. CONSULTANT represents that it employs, or will employ
at is own expense all personnel required in performing the ser-
vices required under this Agreement.
5. All of the services required hereunder will be per-
formed by CONSULTANT or under its direct supervision, and all
personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and shall
be authorized or permitted under state and local law to perform
such services.
6. CITY's Director of Building & Safety (the "Director"
or his designee) shall direct the CONSULTANT to proceed and the
work required shall be completed within the time limit mutually
agreed upon. CONSULTANT shall have no claim for compensation for
any services upon which the Director has not authorized CONSUL-
TANT to proceed.
7. The CONSULTANT shall work closely and cooperate fully
with the Director, or his designee, who shall be the liaison
between CONSULTANT and the CITY and who shall review and approve
all details of the work as it progresses.
8. The CITY reserves the right to terminate or suspend
the Agreement at any time upon seven (7) days written notice ef-
fected by personal delivery or by a bona fide mail service, which
shall be deemed communicated as of the date of receipt thereof,
under any of the following circumstances:
(a) The project, as described in the attached Exhibit
"A", is to be abandoned or indefinitely postponed.
(b) CONSULTANT fails to prosecute the work within the
time limits specified in the attached Exhibit "A".
(c) Unsatisfactory performance by CONSULTANT.
9. No change in the scope of the work to be performed by
CONSULTANT shall be made except in writing between CITY and CON-
SULTANT, which shall set forth the changes mutually agreed upon
by the CITY and the CONSULTANT.
10. In accordance with State Compensation Laws, the
CONSULTANT shall carry Worker's Compensation insurance for all
persons employed in the performance of services as set forth
herein. The CONSULTANT shall provide the CITY with a certificate
verifying such coverage or endorsement acceptable to the CITY
before commencing services under this Agreement. Such policy
shall require thirty (30) days notice to the CITY in writing
prior to cancellation, termination, or expiration of any kind.
11. The CONSULTANT shall carry General Liability insurance
in an amount of not less than $1,000,000. The CONSULTANT shall
provide the City with certificates verifying such coverage or
endorsement acceptable to the City before commencing services
under this Agreement. Such policy shall require thirty (30) days
notice to the City in writing prior to cancellation, termination
or expiration of any kind.
12. If CONSULTANT fails to maintain such insurance, the
CITY may obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount
of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this
Agreement.
13. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limit-
ing in any way the extent to which CONSULTANT may be held respon-
sible to payment of damages to persons or property resulting from
its operations or any operations of any subcontractors under it.
CONSULTANT will be required to indemnify and hold harmless CITY
and its officers and employees from any claims, damages, or ex-
penses, including attorney's fees and court costs, arising out of
CONSULTANT'S negligent performance under this agreement.
14. In the event that legal action is commenced to enforce
or declare the rights created under this Agreement, the prevail-
ing party shall be entitled to an award of costs and reasonable
attorney's fees in the amount to be determined by the court.
15. The CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for all the work or
any part of the work performed under this Agreement at the rates
and in the manner established in the attached Exhibit "A".
16. This Agreement shall begin upon execution and shall
expire on the date shown on the Notice to Proceed unless extended
in writing by mutual agreement of both CITY and CONSULTANT.
17. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and
assigns of the parties, but it shall not be assigned by the CON-
SULTANT without the written consent of the CITY.
18. The CONSULTANT shall not assign any interest in this
Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same
(whether by assignment or otherwise) without the prior written
approval of the CITY, provided, however, that claims for money
due or to become due the CONSULTANT from the CITY under this
Agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other
financial institution or to a Trustee in Bankruptcy, without such
approval. Notice of any such assignment or transfer shall be
furnished promptly to the CITY.
19. No member of the governing body of the CITY and no
other officer, employee, or agent of the CITY who exercises any
functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and
carrying out of the program, shall have any personal financial
interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement; and the CONSUL-
TANT shall take appropriate steps to assure compliance.
20. The CONSULTANT covenants that he presently has no
interest and shall not acquire interest, direct or indirect, in
the study area or any parcels therein or any interest which would
conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of his ser-
vices hereunder. The CONSULTANT further covenants that in the
performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest
shall be employed.
21. This agreement supercedes any and all other agreements,
either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with
respect to the employment of CONSULTANT by CITY and contains all
the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to
such employment in any manner whatsoever. Each party to this
Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements,
promises or agreements, orallyor otherwise, have been made by
any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not
embodied herein, and that no other agreement or amendment hereto
shall be effective unless executed in writing and signed by both
CITY and CONSULTANT.
22. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California, and all ap-
plicable federal statutes and regulations as amended.
23. The invalidity in whole or part of any provision of
this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of California, and all applicable
federal statutes and regulations as amended.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement on the date and year first above written.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
ATTEST: A Municipal Corporation
CITY CLERK
By:
MAYOR, City of Hermosa Beach
By:
CONSULTANT
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONSULTANT
CITY ATTORNEY
EXHIBIT A
Seismic Hazard Mitigation Proposal
Prepared for
City of Hermosa Beach
Submitted by
Melvyn Green and Associates, Inc.
January, 1989
Melvyn Green P.E.
Anne L Watson M.Arch.
January 13, 1989
Mr. William Grove
Director
Department of Building and Safety
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
Re: Seismic Safety Ordinance
Engineering Services
Dear Mr. Grove:
Thank you for this opportunity to submit this proposal to assist the City of
Hermosa Beach in developing a hazard mitigation program for unreinforced
masonry buildings as required by SB -547 (1986).
The enclosed proposal is to assist you in meeting the requirements of the law
by undertaking the survey of unreinforced masonry buildings, developing a
draft ordinance that meets the needs of the community and preparing the
requiredreports to the Seismic Safety Commission.
Another very important aspect of this proposal is to assist the city in
developing citizen understanding and support for the program and assisting
staff in meetings with community groups and the City Council.
We are proposing a lump sum type of contract for the development of the
ordinance and program. For the survey portion we suggest an hourly basis since
the amount of time needed will vary for each building and the number of
buildings cannot be determined in advance. The proposal includes a budget
estimate for this work.
The proposal summarizes our experience in assisting cities and the state with
this effort.
I am looking forward to the possibility of working with you on this important
program. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or need further
information.
Melvyn Green
Structural Engineer
eM t yn Green & Associates Inc. 1145 Artesia Boulevard Suite 204 Manhattan Beach California 90266 (213) 374 6424
Structural Engineers • Architectural Preservation • Materials Conservation • Preservation Planning
Seismic Hazard Mitigation Proposal
Prepared for
City of Hermosa Beach
Submitted by
Melvyn Green and Associates, Inc.
January, 1989
INTRODUCTION
Local and State government officials have been concerned about
earthquakes for many years.
New research has resulted in cost effective methods to improve these
buildings to provide for life safety.
In 1986 legislation (SB -547) was passed requiring all jurisdictions in
Seismic Zone 4 to accomplish three tasks. These are:
• Survey and identify all unreinforced masonry wall structures,
• Develop a hazard mitigation plan and
• Submit a report of the findings to the legislative body and the
Seismic Safety Commission.
This must be completed by January 1,1990.
The earthquake of October 1, 1987 brought a new issue to the attention
of local government: the economic impact of an earthquake. The
experience of Whittier, where a major downtown improvement pro-
gram had recently been completed, is an example of this potential.
Merchants in undamaged buildings were unable to open their busi-
nesses because the streets were dosed due to nearby hazardous
structures. Merchants lost a large amount of money, and the city lost
considerable sales tax dollars, because of the damaged buildings.
As a result of SB -547 and the experience of the Whittier earthquake,
communities throughout California are proposing and adopting or-
dinances relative to strengthening of existing buildings for seismic
forces. Some ordinances are well thought- out and have received
public support. Others have been fought by building owners and
citizens because they believed the proposed ordinance would have a
negative effect on the community.
This proposal is to provide the City of Hermosa Beach with the
necessary technical information to permit an informed choice on the
type of ordinance to be considered, the types of buildings to be
strengthened, an inventory of the URM building stock, and the effect
on the community. In addition, an outline plan for developing public
awareness to the seismic risk faced by the community will be
prepared and assistance in developing public support provided.
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1
PROPOSAL
PROPOSAL
We propose to prepare a technical report and draft ordinance for
seismic strengthening of existing buildings of the type that have
proved hazardous in previous earthquakes in California. In the report
we will address the following issues:
• Why are some buildings hazardous in earthquakes?
• Do such buildings exist in Hermosa Beach?
• What are the life safety issues?
• What are the property damage issues?
• What are the costs to rehabilitate these buildings?
• Will business or residents be displaced by this ordinance?
• What are the pros and cons of seismic strengthening of these
buildings?
• What is the economic impact on the community if these structures
should be damaged in an earthquake?
Examples of the specific building types addressed and the issues
involved would be presented for consideration. The final report
would contain the technical information mentioned above and
recommendations in a draft ordinance form.
City of Hermosa Beach Page 2
TASKS
The suggested scope of work is:
Task 1. Hazards Identification and Issues. Identify the hazards,
rehabilitation and strengthening techniques, applicability and costs
for building types similar to those found in Hermosa Beach. Review
efforts of other cities in the state relative to adopted ordinances for
seismic safety. Work with city staff to review the type of program
options available to Hermosa Beach. The report will suggest methods
for developing public understanding and support for seismic
strengthening.
Task 2. Buildings in Hermosa Beach that may be Potentially Haz-
ardous. Identify the specific types of potentially hazardous structures
located in Hermosa Beach. Review the implications of these structures
in the context of the findings of Task 1. Prepare a draft report of
findings and recommendations for submission to city staff. Meet with
city staff to review preliminary recommendations.
Task 3. Report and Meetings with Council and Citizen Groups.
Based on the comments in response to the Task 2 report, prepare final
report and draft ordinance. Meet with staff to review recommenda-
tions. Assist in establishing a citizens' committee, meet with them,
and obtain their comments and concerns in development of a draft
ordinance. In addition a presentation of the findings and recommen-
dations to the City Council is induded in this proposal.
Task 4. Survey and Identification of Unreinforced Masonry Build-
ings. Using city -provided maps, data, historic surveys and similar
documents, survey the community for unreinforced masonry wall
buildings. Prepare an individual report for each structure with the
information required by law and as needed for effective code enfor-
cement.
Task 5. Seismic Safety Commission Report. The findings of the
survey and any adopted regulations will be presented in a report
format to the city and in a form that can be submitted to the Seismic
Safety Commission.
f
City of Hermosa Beach Page 3
PROJECTS
QUALIFICATIONS
Melvyn Green and Associates, Inc. brings special qualifications to
help communities address the problems of safety in existing build-
ings. The firm has performed work for many agencies of local govern-
ment, federal agencies and building code bodies relative to seismic
safety of existing buildings. In addition, since the office also performs
architectural and structural engineering, the real problems of im-
plementing the ordinances from the point of view of the property
owner and agency are in the forefront of our work.
Significant projects providing experience for this activity indude:
California Seismic Safety Commission - We prepared a
"Guidebook" for local government relative to implementation of the
URM Law and gave presentations on the law to building and plan-
ning departments statewide.
County of San Bernardino - We prepared a seismic safety handbook
for assisting communities in developing and implementing hazard
mitigation programs. This book anticipated a cooperative program
with building, redevelopment and community development depart-
ments.
City of Lake Elsinore - We are assisting in developing a seismic safety
program in compliance with URM law. We have completed a study
of costs for strengthening city owned buildings and the survey and
are now preparing a report for the City Council.
City of Beverly Hills - We prepared a report for the city relative to
options for seismic hazard mitigation ordinances, including a draft
ordinance. We meet with City Council, Planning Commission and
other bodies to the review ordinance, incentives and other options
and are assisting in meeting with other interested community groups.
We anticipate beginning the survey shortly.
City of Redlands - We are beginning the survey and other phases of
the program. In addition the project will examine tilt -up concrete
industrial buildings and mobile home seismic safety improvement
options.
International Conference of Building Officials - We prepared a new
code titled the Uniform Code for Building Conservation, including a
section on seismic requirements for existing buildings.
City of Hermosa Beach Page 4
Other specific project experience applicable to this project include:
City of Yuma, Arizona - We prepared a building code, including
seismic provisions for existing buildings and developed design
guidelines for building rehabilitation in downtown and historic dis-
tricts.
City of San Diego - We developed a "Building Code Cookbook" to
guide developers and others through the city regulatory system.
Los Angeles CRA - We developed a handbook about regulatory
procedures for building rehabilitation in the Los Angeles CBD.
United States Fire Administration - We performed a study titled
Effective Code Administration and Enforcement.
National Science Foundation - We received two grants to study the
techniques and issues relative to seismic safety and existing buildings.
U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development - We as-
sisted in development of the HUD Guidelines for Rehabilitation.
Committee Activities
Chairman -Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Committee
on Existing Buildings.
Secretary -American Society of Civil Engineers Standards Commit-
tee on Condition Assessment of Structures.
f
City of Hermosa Beach Page 5
SCHEDULE
The technical report would be accomplished over a one hundred and
eighty day period. This includes time for research, meetings with staff
and report preparation. Additional time may be needed for the public
information phase of the project.
City of Hermosa Beach Page 6
FEES
City of Hermosa Psach
Seismic Hazard !!itioetion Fr_or?.rn
Technical Proposal
Januar✓ 9, 1989
4elvvn Green °< Associates. Inc.
Fsr=.onnel Rate Hours Task 1 Hours Task 2 Hours Task 3 Hours Task 4 Hours Task 5
Note 1
Princioal Engineer $90.00 20 $1.800 20 $1,800 24 $2.160 20 $1.800 9 $720
Staff Engineer $50.00 12 $600 16 $800 8 1400 32
$1.600 4 $200
Jr. Engineericlerical 140.00 8 $320 69 $2,720 $)
Out -of -Pocket E;a. ¢0 130 $250 1400 10
Task Total 12.400
Total - Tasks 1. 2. 7 and 5
Estimate - Ta;{. 4
$2.970 $2.810
$9.100
$6,520
PrYm,tzzl Total $15,620
Notes:
1. 5urvev cost esti' to is based on 6 hours per building to review r'ecor'ds,
obsa"ve structure and cenalete forms.
"vats for this item ar'e al estimate since the number of buildings
is undefined. Estivate based on 20 structures.
16,520 $920
April 17, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the City Council April 25, 1989
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT
PORTION OF VALLEY PARK
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended the City Council approve an agreement between
the City and the School District for maintenance of the School
District portion of Valley Park encompassing the following
conditions:
The City shall maintain the physical area o•f the
park;
The City shall administer the use of that area
The City shall pay to the School District a fee of
$1 annually;
- The City of Hermosa Beach shall name the Hermosa
Beach School District as an Additional Insured;
The School District shall write a lease reflecting
these conditions.
Further, that City Council appropriate $1,700 from Prospective
Expenditures into Public Works, Parks Division Budget for
maintenance of that portion of Valley Park and for the remainder
of this fiscal year.
BACKGROUND
The City has been receiving many complaints regarding this
portion of Valley Park with regard to the lack of maintenance.
The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission
in response to these complaints requested the staff of the School
District and the City's Community Resources Department meet to
discuss a possible solution to this problem.
ANALYSIS
The School Board has indicated interest in the City maintaining
their portion of Valley Park in exchange for the City being
allowed to control the use of the area perhaps through a permit
process.The City would treat this as another recreation facility
that may require a reservation and possible fee for the use of
the softball/soccer field. A policy for this will be developed. by
the Commission.
Preliminary cost estimates for the maintenance of that area
submitted by the Public Works Department are as follows:
Renovation/restoration costs are estimated at $22,300. And the
annual maintenance is estimated at $9,949.
1
11
All of Valley Park will be addressed in the Master Plan. However
until that project is completed, staff is suggesting the Council
approve regular maintenance be done to that area of the park.
CITY MANAGER COMMENT:
Respectfully submitted,
;443040b1 0;%::47L:=2
Alana Mastrian-Handman
Director
Dept. of Community Resources
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Finance Administrator
The area of Valley Park owned by the School District is currently
being used as part of the City park by the public, so it is
appropriate for the City to assume maintenance responsibilities.
Consistent maintenance of the entire park by one agency reduces
costs, improves appearance, and is a good example of cooperative
efforts among local public agencies.
2
April 17, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City Council Meeting
of April 25, 1989
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS AND FUNDING
APPROPRIATIONS FOR VARIOUS STATE GRANTS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended the City Council:
approve amendments to the State Grants as listed on
attachment A;
approve a reimbursement to the State in the amount of
$11,250 with said amount to be appropriated from the Parks
& Recreation Facility Tax Fund into the Dept. of Community
Resources Budget;
approve the advancement of $31,113 from the Parks &
Recreation Facility Tax Fund into the CIP accounts listed
on Attachment A.
BACKGROUND
At the Council meetings of January 24 and February 14 the City
Council did approve the expenditure of the remaining funds in
these various grants for the projects listed on attachment A. At
that time staff indicated we would return to have Council amend
the contracts once the state approved our projects. That is what
is before you this evening.
Additionally, at the time the City Council denied the tearing
down of the Old Propsect School, staff reported the City would
then need to reimburse the state for that portion of the grant
that was earmarked for the demolition. That is also before you
this evening.
ANALYSIS
As indicated above, the City Council has already approved the new
projects that will be funded by the remaining monies in these
outstanding grants. However, there is one change in that. The
monies remaining in the 6th and Prospect Grant ($7, 958) can only
be spent at that location. It cannot be spent elsewhere. In
discussing this matter with the Public Works Department, it was
their considered opinion the money could best be spent on an
irrigation system, picnic tables, sod, drinking fountain and
trash cans at that location. The irrigation and sod have not
been approved by Council previously.
Since the City Council has decided not to demolish the Old
Prospect School Building located at 6th and Prospect, the City is
1
1m
Since the City Council has decided not to demolish the Old
Prospect School Building located at 6th and Prospect, the City is
obligated to reimburse the State $11,250 for that portion of the
grant that was never executed. Please see attachments B & C.
(no0
The City has $31,113 of State money to spend. The processAis that
the City expend its own funds and then receive reimbursement from
the State.
And lastly, the State will be reimbursing the City another
$40,112.77 for projects completed in the past. That payment will
be processed upon the State receiving our $11,250 reimbursement
to them.
Concur:
Kevin . Nor 'hcraft
City Manager
Respectfully submitted,
Alana Mastrian-Handma
Assistant City Manager
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
abj
Viki Copeland
Finance Administrator
Attachment A
FUNDING APPROPRIATIONS FOR VARIOUS STATE GRANTS
City Council approval of amendments to the following grants:
CIP 89-516
#19-0019 6th. & Prospect Park: $7,958
- The scope of the work shall be amended to include the
installation of an irrigation system ($4,900); purchasing of new
sod ($858), picnic tables ($1,000), aggregate trash cans ($800),
and drinking fountain ($400).
CIP 89-517
#76-19026 Recreation Facilities: $8,742
- The scope of the work shall be amended to include the
purchase of playground equipment ($8,050), and park drinking
fountains ($692).
CIP 89-518
#80-19019 Recreation Facilities: $12,305
- The scope of the work shall be amended to include the
purchase of playground. equipment ($12,305).
CIP 89-519
#BE -19-721 Hermosa Parks: $2,108
- The scope of the work shall be amended to include the
purchase of picnic tables ($2,108).
1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY
Attachment B (1 of 2
GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
P.O. BOX 942896
SACRAMENTO 94296-0001
(916) 322-9591
March 28, 1989
Ms. Alana Mastrian -Handman
Aunt ay Manager
Qty of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beath, CA 90254-3885
Dear M Mastriar-Handman:
Status Report - Hermosa. Beach Grant Projects
The following information is provided in answer to your letter of January 26, 1989 and our telephone
conversation on March 23, 1989.
&
1. Smith and Prospect Park - #19.0019
Per Odel King's letter dated November 24,1987 (copy enclosed), the City will have to refund $11,250
since you failed to remove the building. The remaining finds may be used for playground
equipment, irrigation, etc., as long as it is for outdoor facilities.
2 Recreation Facilities - #76-19026
You may amend in playground equipment and park trash cans. Letter amendment will suffice plus
an updated cost estimate.
3. Recreation Facilities - #80-19019
d'
You may amend to include playground equipment, baseball backstop, baseball basis, drinking fountain
and portable softfield field fence. A letter amendment will suffice plus an updated cost estimate.
Your progress payment for $40,112.77 will be forwarded for payment upon receipt of the $11250
refund from the 1974 Bond Act Project #19.0019.
4. Hermosa Parks - #BE -19-721
You may amend to include park drinking fountains and trash cars. A letter amendment will suffice
plus an updated cost estimate.
Attachment B (2 of 2)
Ms. Alava Mas an-Handrnan
Manch 2f3, 1989
Page
2 -
Upon receipt of our letter specifying proposed scope mages approved by Your counsel, we will proceed
If you have any questions, please tail.
Sincerely,
Georgene Gloria Albright
Project Officer
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—TME RESOURCES AGENCY
Attachment C
GEORGE OEUKMEJIAN, Govern,
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
P.O BOX 942896
SACRAMENTO 94296.0001
(916) 322-9583
November 24, 1987
Ms. Alana Mastrian
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Dear Alana:
Sixth & Prospect Park
Project #19-0019
This is to follow-up our discussion of last week
regarding the disposition of the building at the Sixth
and Prospect Park. My records indicate that we
advanced the City $50,000 to purchase the land, leaving
a balance of $7,958. The building was to be demolished
(74 Bond Act does not allow for indoor facilities).
As I mentioned, the City will have to refund $11,250,
since you failed to remove the building. This sum
represents the pro -rated cost for the portion of land
occupied by the building.
You asked whether the City could move the unused money
from the grant to another site. The answer is no.
However, you may spend the money at Sixth and Prospect
Park for further development. This would require an
amendment.
Please let me know how you plan to proceed.
Sincerely,
Odel T. King Jr.
Project Officer
April 20, 1989
City Council Meeting
April 25, 1989
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
VACANCIES - BOARDS AND:COMMISSIONS
CIVIL SERVICE' COMMISSION
ONE VACANCY - TERM ENDING JULY 15, 1992
The City Clerk's office received a letter of resignation from
Commissioner Joe Miller on April 20, 1989.
Recommendation:
To accept the resignation of Mr. Joe Miller with thanks, instruct
staff to prepare appropriate recognition for presentation, and
direct the City Clerk to advertise for applicants for the
vacancy.
Background
The Civil Service Commission functions as the City's Review Board
pertaining to personnel functions and Civil Service Rules and
Regulations in conjunction with N.S. 211 (People's Initiative).
Members of the Civil Service Commission shall be qualified
electors of Hermosa Beach.
Concur:
EV N . NOR .rCRAFT, City Manager
April 19, 1989
City Council
City of Hermosa Beach
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council:
It is with deep regret that I must resign my position as Civil Service
Commissioner. I have accepted an employment offer fram Tulare County to
serve as the Personnel Officer for the Department of Social Services. My
family and I will be relocating to the town of Visalia, which is located 45
miles south of Fresno, near Sequoia National Park. We leave with mixed
emotions, excited to be moving to a quiet town near the lakes and mountains,
but saddened to be leaving the beach and the many friends we have here.
I would like to thank the Council for having the courage to appoint a
newcomer to an unfinished Civil Service Commission term in June of 1986 when
I had only lived in Hermosa Beach for a year and a half, and then to
reappoint me to a full term in July of 1988. A person so new to a community
rarely receives such an opportunity. I feel that one of the most productive
sessions for the Civil Service Commission was the joint meeting of the City
Council and the Commission in December of last year. The concern and input
of the Council is important to those serving on Commissions and I would
encourage you to continue the practice of periodic joint meetings.
Thank you for the opportunity to participate in our local government. It
has given me a different perspective on our City and has given me further
reasons why Hermosa Beach is such a desirable place to live.
Very fly yours,
. E. MILLER
f
Honorable Mayor and April 18, 1989
Members of the City Council
ACTIVITY REPORT
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
MARCH, 1989
Attached for your information are recap sheets of department ac-
tivity for the month of March as well as the quarterly report of
buildings completed and demolished from January 1, 1989 thru
March 30, 1989.
Overall permit activity remained steady in March as the depart-
ment issued 63 permits of which 23 were building permits. Two
permits were issued for single family dwellings, three permits
were issued for duplex dwellings and one permit was issued for a
four unit structure. Six permits were issued for alterations or
additions to existing dwellings. Five dwelling units were de-
molished resulting in a net increase of seven to the housing
inventory.
Building Department general fund revenue for 75% of the fiscal
year is $318,271.80 or 81.6% of projected revenue for the fiscal
year.
The Business License division reports that 150 licenses were is-
sued during March resulting in revenue of $19,939.00. Business
License revenue to date is $287,595.43 or 60.5% of projected
revenue for the fiscal year.
The department logged 24 new code enforcement complaints during
March, of which five were for suspected illegal dwelling units.
Illegal dwelling unit enforcement was severely hampered during
March as the inspector assigned that task was off duty with an
IOD for the majority of the month. The department has thirty
cases under investigation.
Noted:
Kevin( B. No h raft
City Manager
Respectfully Submitted,
William Grove
Director, Bldg. & Safety
t
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED Month of MARCH, 1989
TYPE OF STRUCTURE
DWELLING
UNITS
PERMITS PROVIDED VALUATION
1. Single Dwellings 2 2 271,869
2. Duplex Dwellings 3 6 688,493
3. Triplex Dwellings
4. Four Units 1 4 508,569
5. Five Units or More
6. Commercial Buildings
7. Industrial Buildings
8. Publicly Owned Buildings
9. Garages - Residential
10. Accessory Buildings
11. Fences and Walls
12. Swimming Pools
13. Alterations, additions or
repairs to dwellings 6 260,391
14. Alterations, additions or
repairs to Commercial Bldgs. 4 19,000
15. Alterations, additions or
repairs to indus. bldgs.
16. Alterations, additions or
repairs to publicly owned bldgs.
17. Alterations, additions, repairs
to garages or accessory bldgs. 1 1,200
18. Signs
19. Dwelling units moved
20. Dwelling units demolished 5 -5
21. All other permits not listed 1 10,000
TOTAL PERMITS 23
TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS:
1,759,522.
TOTAL DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED : 12
TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DEMOLISHED: 5
NET CHANGE: +7
NET DWELLING UNIT CHANGE FY 88/89 +17
CUMULATIVE DWELLING UNIT TOTAL: 10,048
(INCLUDES PERMITS ISSUED)
1
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT
Month Ending MARCH 1989
NUMBER OF
PERMITS
Building
Plumbing
Electric
Plan Check
Sewer Use
Res. Bldg.Reports
Comm. Inspections
Parks & Recreation
In lieu Park & Rec.
Board of Appeals
Sign Review
Fire Flow Fees
LAST MONTH
THIS MONTH
21
28
19
16
1
24
20
0
2
0
3
8
23
19
21
11
4
36
25
0
5
0
8
7
THIS YEAR TO
DATE
278
219
205
129
19
321
154
5
28
1
26
84
THIS MONTH LAST YEAR
LAST YEAR TO DATE
25 242
31 242
24 195
16 102
3 39
60 281
26 195
2 5
3 24
2 8
1 21
TOTALS
142
159
1,469
193 1,354
FEES
Building**
Plumbing
Electric
Plan Check
Sewer Use
Res. Bldg. Reports
Comm. Inspections
Parks & Recreation
In lieu Park & Rec.
Board of Appeals
Sign Review
Fire Flow Fees
16,576.62
3,308.00
1,173.00
13,694.94
965.00
920.00
500.00
0
16,335.00
0
75.00
29,049.50
15,552.06
1,872.00
3,042.00
8,518.00
3,236.24
1,440.00
625.00
0
39,204.00
0
200.00
12,471.00
144,082.19
21,913.00
27,601.00
107,207.61
15,408.86
12,808.00
3,985.00
37,102.00
153,549.00
75.00
600.00
121,836,59
13,210.58 107,219.78
3,056.00 22,631.50
2,396.00 29,648.00
12,599.00 78,227.76
2,209.03 18,833.22
2,400.00 11,070.00
650.00 4,875.00
10,500.00 31,500.00
16,335.00 159,083.00
150.00 600.00
25.00 525.00
TOTALS
82,597.06
86,160.30 646,168.25 63,530.61 464,213.26
VALUATIONS
1,484,935
1,159,522 10,748,824
1,241,916 I0,029,916
**Includes State Seismic Fee $124.68
QUARTERLY REPORT FOR HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
BUILDINGS COMPLETED AND BUILDINGS DEMOLISHED
JANUARY 1, 1989 THRU MARCH 31, 1989
ADDRESS NO. OF UNITS
1620 Monterey
2416 Silverstrand
42 & 44 8th Street
1063 Loma
1057 Loma
1061 Loma
1059 Loma
801 Loma
803 Loma
1430 Hermosa
1426 & 1428 Hermosa
1835 Valley Park
844 Manhattan Ave.
645 Longfellow
1510 Prospect
610 9th Street
DEMOLISHED
ADDRESS
1235 2nd Street
620 10th Street
640 6th Street
120 4th Street
316 8th Street
1111 Valley Drive
918 7th Street
840 18th Street
1034 8th Street
852 Cypress
1737 Prospect
760 Monterey
725 9th Street
530 Loma
1424 Ocean Drive
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
2 (Condos.)
1 (Condo.)
1 (Condo.)
1 (Condo.)
1 (Condo.)
1 (Condo.)
1 (Condo.)
1 (Condo.)
2 (Condos.)
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
3 (Condos.)
DATE COMPLETED
1/17/89
1/19/89
1/26/89
2/14/89
2/14/89
2/14/89
2/14/89
2/15/89
2/15/89
2/22/89
2/22/89
2/27/89
3/6/89
3/13/89
3/15/89
3/27/89
NO. OF UNITS DATE COMPLETED
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
7 (Apt.)
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
2 (SFRs)
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
2 (Condos.)
1 (SFR)
1 (SFR)
1/3/89
1/9/89
1/12/89
1/19/89
1/31/89
2/1/89
2/1/89
2/2/89
2/8/89
2/16/89
3/2/89
3/9/89
3/13/89
3/20/89
3/27/89
BUSINESS LICENSE REPORT FOR THE
MONTH OF MARCH 1989
TO: Wm. Grove, Building & Safety Director
FROM: Mary Fehskens, Administrative Aide
DATE: April 18, 1989
NEW BUSINESS LICENSES ISSUED:
Out of City License Issued:
Home Occupation License Issued:
New Business' Opened:
New Owners of Existing Business:
TOTAL NUMBER OF LICENSES ISSUED:
BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWALS MAILED:
DELINQUENT NOTICES MAILED:
25
11
14
1
51
150
99
NEW & RENEWAL LICENSES ISSUED: 150
REPORTS SOLD: - 0
BUSINESS LICENSE REVENUE: $19,939.00
BUSINESS LICENSE REVENUE YEAR-TO-DATE: $287,595.43
April 17, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting
the Hermosa Beach City Council of April 25, 1989
PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT MARCH ACTIVITY REPORT
Recruitment:
* Initiated recruitment for the positions of Senior Building
Inspector, Building Inspector, and Associate Planner.
* Completed testing for the positions of Deputy City Engineer,
Assistant Planner, Court Liaison Officer, Property &
Evidence Technician, and Business License Inspector.
Labor Relations:
* Conducted initial negotiations meeting with representatives
of the Firefighters' Association.
Risk Management:
* Conducted a liability claims review with the City's
Administrator, J.S. Ward & Co.
* Conducted a workers' comp. claims review with the City's
Administrator, Gates McDonald & Co.
General Appropriations Secretary:
The current word processing secretary commenced employment
February 16, 1989. This position performs secretarial support
services for all the City's departments, directory assistance for
incoming calls, and mail processing. A monthly summary indicat-
ing the percentage of time spent performing each function will be
provided as part of the monthly activity report.
March: 180 hours available
Word Processing*
52.5% (94.5hrs)
*Public Works:
*Planning:
*Personnel:
*City Manager:
Respectfully sub
Mail Processing Directory/Misc. Duties
15.8% (28.5hrs) 31.7% (57.0hrs)
34.2% (61.5 hrs)
12.2% (22.0 hrs)
4.7% ( 8.5 hrs)
1.4% ( 2.5 hrs)
'tted,
Robert A. Blackwood
Personnel Director
Noted:
Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
Honorable Mayor and Members of
the Hermosa Beach City Council
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MARCH ACTIVITY REPORT
April 10, 1989
City Council Meeting
of April 25, 1989
PARKING ENFORCEMENT
3/88 3/89 87/88FY 88/89FY
Parking Cites Issued 7,311 6,919 67,507 61,565
Vehicles Impounded/Booted 32 36 420 292
Calls Responded To 107 103 1,223 961
Booting Revenue $6,246.00 $3,440 $64,174.50 $41,770
ANIMAL CONTROL
Citations Issued 42 59 600 461
Warnings Issued 0 0 10 1
Complaints Responded To 44 54 515 420
Total Number of Animals 40 51 493 436
Picked -Up of which:
Returned to Owner 11 17 148 129
Taken to Shelter 13 19 148 148
Injured, taken to Vet 5 2 23 16
Deceased 11 13 164 146
NOTE: Figures for this month have been corrected. Last month's figures
for FY88/89 were in error.
CONCUR:
J• ! Noon, Director
General Services
Kevin B. Nor hcraft
City Manager
Respectfully submitted,
Joan Noon, Director
by €L 2 . /-!'.t,L L4r—
Michele D. Tercero,
Administrative Aide
April 17, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the Hermosa Beach City Council
RECOMMENDATION TO INTRODUCE AN
OF THE "HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE"
City Council Meeting
of April 25, 1989
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 17-55
WHICH RELATES TO SECURITY ALARM SYSTEMS
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council introduce the attached ordinance.
BACKGROUND:
Every week, Police and Fire units are dispatched to possible emergency
situations as the result of home and business alarm systems designed and
installed to report possible fires, burglaries, holdups, etc.
The majority of these calls turn out to be "false alarms" caused by system
malfunctions, poor maintenance of the systems, employee or citizen error and
carelessness, and occasional problems not within the control of the business or
home owner.
These false alarms are not only a drain on police and fire resources, they are
also very annoying to the residential neighborhoods.
ANALYSIS:
Although we have not done a scientific study regarding the percentage of alarm
calls that are false, other cities have. It has been determined that 95 to 99%
of the alarm calls are false.
These type of calls are ever increasing as more and more home and business
owners have them installed because of fear of crime and for insurance purposes.
When properly installed, maintained and utilized, they are very effective in
protecting property, providing peace of mind, and giving a potential edge to the
public safety departments.
The rising number of false alarms; however, presents a drain
resources and a multitude of associated problems such as:
- Increased potential for injury to citizens and public
responding to the calls,
- Unnecessary out -of -service time for officers to investigate false alarm
calls, insure that the home or business is secure and notifications to
responsible parties are made,
- Removes police officers from their primary duties of preventive patrol and
law enforcement,
on public safety
safety officers
- Causes unnecessary radio traffic,
1
11
- Places unnecessary workload on dispatchers answering repeated calls from
alarm companies,
- Causes complacency by repeated responses to alarm locations that con-
tinually report false signals, and
- Is extremely annoying to the peace and quiet of residential neighborhoods.
The existing ordinance which addresses the topic of alarm systems and their
operation is basically a very thorough document. However, the only penalty for
repeated false alarms is revocation of the alarm permit. While this is one
remedy, it could leave a home or business vunerable to attack while the alarm is
deactivated. This could present a source of liability and/or complaint to the
City.
In an attempt to curtail the rising number of false alarms while still allowing
the systems to remain operational, many cities have adopted revisions to their
alarm ordinances which allow monetary fines for repeated/excessive false alarms.
This has proven to be successful in most instances in that the owners are
encouraged to assure that their systems are operating properly and that users
are trained properly in order to avoid a fine being levied. This attention has
caused a general reduction in the number of false alarms and has caused the
owner who continues to have false alarms to bear the financial burden for the
unnecessary responses.
We feel that such an amendment to our ordinance would be effective and
worthwhile in helping to reduce the number of false alarm calls.
CONCUR:
Kevin B. North/raft, City Manager
2
Rel tful y S i itted,
Steve S. W s iewski
Director of Public Safety
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
ARTICLE IV, SECTION 17-55 ET SEQ, OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ALARM SYSTEMS.
WHEREAS, Article IV, Section 17-55 et seq, relating to alarm
systems, creating a permit system and attempting to prevent the
occurrence of false alarms, was adopted by the City Council as
Ordinance 85-792, effective April 9, 1985; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that responding to
false alarms continues to be a problem in the City in that it is
time consuming, contributes to noise complaints and is dangerous
for the citizens and officers of Hermosa Beach; and
WHEREAS, amendments to Article IV, Section 17-55 et seq, will
enable City personnel to reduce some causes of repeated false
alarms and thereby conserve public safety personnel time, reduce
noise violations, and protect the citizens and officers;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Article IV, Section 17-55 et seq, of the Hermosa
Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
ARTICLE IV. ALARM SYSTEMS.
SECTION 17-55. PURPOSE.
The purpose of this article is to establish standards and
controls of the various types of intrusion, holdup, and other
emergency signals from alarm systems that require public safety
response or investigation, and for the businesses and persons
installing and servicing said systems, in order to protect the
public health, safety and welfare, and prevent false alarms.
SECTION 17-55.1. DEFINITIONS
1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
For the purposes of this chapter, certain words and phrases
shall be construed as set forth in this section, unless it is
otherwise apparent from the context that a different meaning is
intended.
(a) "Alarm System" means any mechanical, electrical or elec-
tronic device that is designed or used for the detection of an
unauthorized entry into a building, structure, or facility, to
signal the commission of an unlawful act, to signal that heat,
smoke, or fire has been detected, or to signal that fire extin-
guishment equipment has been activated. It specifically does not
include automobile alarms or auxiliary devices installed by a
telephone company or utility which is or may be utilized to re-
port equipment damage or disruption of service.
(b) "Audible Alarm" means a device designed to notify per-
sons in the vicinity of the protected premises by emission of an
audible sound to signal a need for emergency response.
(c) "Direct Dial Device" means any system connected to a
telephone line which upon activation, automatically dials a pre-
determined telephone number and transmits a message or signal
indicating the need for an emergency response.
(d) "False Alarm" means an alarm signal activated by sub-
scriber negligence or for any reason not of an emergency nature
or when activated due to a malfunction of any segment of the
alarm system and which necessitates a response by the Fire or
Police Department when, in fact, no emergency exists.
(e) "Chief of Police" means the Director of Public Safety of
the City of Hermosa Beach.
(f) "Silent Alarm" means a device for the detection of unau-
thorized entry or illegal act upon the premises which does not
2.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
generate an audible signal or sound on the premises when it is
activated, but rather transmits a signal directly to the Public
Safety Communications Center or to an alarm company central
office.
(g) "Permittee" means any person holding an alarm system
permit issued in compliance with the regulations set forth in
this chapter.
(h) "Alarm company operator" means that term as defined in
Section 7590.2 of the Business and Professions Code for the State
of California.
SECTION 17.55.2. ALARM SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS.
In addition to the permit or permits required by Section
17.55.4, the following requirements and prohibitions apply to
permitted alarm systems.
(a) Every person maintaining an alarm system shall provide
the Chief of Police with a current listing of the names, ad-
dresses and telephone numbers of the persons to be notified to
render service and repairs to the alarm system and additionally
to secure the premises during any hour of the day or night that
the alarm system is activated. The Permittee, or designee, must
be able to be present at the alarm location within forty-five
(45) minutes of a request by the Hermosa Beach Police Department
or Communications Center. The listing required by this Section
must be kept current by the person maintaining that alarm system.
(b) No person shall install or maintain any audible alarm
system which emits an audible sound for longer than ten (10) mi-
nutes after activation. Any audible alarm that continues to emit
a sound for longer than ten (10) minutes or generates more than
three (3) false alarms in any twenty-four (24) hour period may be
3.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
declared a nuisance by the Chief of Police, or designee. An
Alarm that has been declared a nuisance under this section may be
disconnected by the Chief of Police or designee. A designee may
include, but is not limited to, Police Department personnel, Fire
Department personnel, or other City personnel. Pursuant to this
Chapter, the permittee shall be charged for all costs incurred by
or reasonably borne by the City in disconnecting the nuisance.
(d) All alarm systems shall be equipped with an uninterrup-
tible power supply in such a manner that the failure or interrup-
tion of normal electrical utility power shall not activate the
alarm system. This power supply must be rechargeable and capable
of at least four hours of operation.
SECTION 17.55.3. REGISTRATION OF ALARM COMPANY OPERATORS.
No person, individual, firm, company, association, organiza-
tion, partnership, corporation or other entity shall engage in,
conduct, or operate as an alarm company operator, or agent to an
alarm company operator, as that term is defined in Section 7590.2
of the Business & Professions Code of the State of California,
without registering its name and filing a copy of its State of
California identification card and a copy of its City Business
License with the Chief of Police.
SECTION 17.55.4. PERMITS REQUIRED
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person, individual, firm,
company, association, organization, partnership, corporation or
other entity to use, install or cause to be installed an alarm
system on any premises within the City without having obtained an
alarm system permit issued pursuant to this chapter. However, if
the alarm system is installed by a licensed alarm company opera-
tor, the permit may be applied for within five (5) business days
4.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
of when the alarm system is installed and operational.
(b) A separate alarm system permit shall be required for
each premises on which an alarm system is used or installed.
Each alarm system must have a permit, and multiple permits are
required if multiple alarm systems are installed on one premises.
(c) An alarm company operator, or agent to the alarm company
operator, should inform its client that an alarm system permit is
required by the City and is the responsibility of the client.
(d) The alarm company operator or agent shall notify the
Chief of Police, or designee, each time an alarm system is in-
stalled by said alarm company operator or agent. This notifica-
tion shall be on a form prescribed by the Chief of Police. Such
notice shall be delivered to the Chief of Police within five (5)
business days of when the alarm system is installed and
operational.
(e) Alarm system permits are non -transferable. Any change
in ownership of an alarm system, premises upon which an alarm
system is operated, or business that operates an alarm system,
shall require a new alarm system permit for the operation of the
alarm system, issued pursuant to this chapter. The application
for an alarm system permit upon the transfer of property pursuant
to this subsection shall be considered as an application for a
new alarm system.
(f) Pursuant to regulations promulgated by the Chief of
Police necessary to protect against the dangers to be eliminated
by this Ordinance, the Chief of Police may allow the installation
and operation of an alarm system without a permit for the pur-
poses of testing such alarm system and determining its suitabili-
ty for use within the City.
5.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECTION 17.55.5. PERMITS; APPLICATION: FEES.
(a) Application for alarm system permits shall be made to
the Police Department of the City. The Police Department shall
prescribe the form of the application and request said informa-
tion as it deems necessary to evaluate and act upon the applica-
tion. All applications shall be submitted by the applicant under
penalty of perjury. The Chief of Police, or designee, shall
determine and set the conditions necessary for the installation
and operation of alarm systems within the City.
(b) An application for alarm system permit shall not be com-
plete unless accompanied by a non-refundable fee as prescribed in
Section 2-112 of the Municipal Code, titled "Public Safety Ser-
vices," in order to recover costs reasonably borne in processing
said application.
SECTION 17.55.6. RIGHT OF INSPECTION.
At the request of the Chief of Police, a City employee or
agent may inspect any alarm system on the premises where it is
intended to function prior to issuance of any permit for its in-
stallation and operation. The purpose of the inspection or in-
spections shall be to insure that the alarm system will function
as designed and complies with the provisions of this chapter.
SECTION 17.55.7. PERMITS: CORRECTION OF INFORMATION
(a) Whenever a change occurs relating to the written infor-
mation required on the permit application, the applicant or per-
mittee shall give written notice of such change to the Police
Department within five (5) calendar days.
(b) Any changes in the information required by Section
17.55.2(a), persons to be contacted, or persons responsible for
the repair and servicing of the alarm system shall be given by
6.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
the permittee, in writing, to the Chief of Police as soon as pos-
sible and in no event later than five (5) calendar days from such
change.
SECTION 17.55.8. TELEPHONE DEVICE PROHIBITED.
No person shall use any alarm system which is equipped with
direct dial device which, when activated, automatically dials any
telephone within the Fire Department, Police Department or the
Public Safety Communications Center.
SECTION 17.55.9. NOTIFICATION OF TESTS.
Permittees shall notify the Dispatcher at the Public Safety
Communications Center prior to any service, test, repair, main-
tenance, adjustment, alteration or installation of any alarm sys-
tem which would normally result in a police response. Any alarm
received immediately following such notification shall not con-
stitute a false alarm for the purposes of this chapter.
SECTION 17.55.10. PERMITS: REVOCATION.
An alarm system permit may be revoked by the Chief of Police
for any of the following reasons:
(a) Failure to observe any of the regulations, conditions of
the permit, or other provisions of this chapter;
(b) False representations knowingly made upon any applica-
tion or notice of change required by the provisions of this
chapter;
(c) Where the permittee fails to pay the service charges
billed;
(d) Any alarm system designated a nuisance by the Chief of
Police. The Chief of Police may declare an alarm system at a
specific location a nuisance if such alarm system actuates exces-
sive false alarms, It is hereby found and determined that more
7.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
than four (4) false alarms within any three (3) consecutive cal-
endar month period is excessive and thereby constitutes a public
nuisance. The Chief of Police shall not consider any false alarm
as a nuisance alarm if such false alarm occurs within thirty (30)
days of the date the alarm system is installed and operational,
nor any false alarm generated by a violent act of God or nature
and which was not the result of the negligence of the permittee,
or permittee's agent, or a defect in the alarm system.
SECTION 17.55.11. PERMITS: REVOCATION: NOTICES: EFFECTIVE
DATE.
(a) A written notice of revocation, stating the reason for
such revocation, shall be personally served upon or mailed to the
permittee by certified mail addressed to the permittee at the
permittee's address shown on the application or on the latest
notice of change on file with the City. In the event the notice
is mailed, service shall be deemed complete upon deposit in he
United States mail. The effective date of the revocation of an
alarm system permit shall be fifteen (15) days after the service
of notice of revocation. During such fifteen (15) day period,
the permittee may show cause, in writing, to the Chief of Police
why the permit should not be revoked.
(b) Whenever the revocation of an alarm system permit be-
comes effective, the permit shall be surrendered forthwith to the
Chief of Police, and the alarm system shall forthwith be removed
or deactivated.
SECTION 17.55.12. PERMITS: REVOCATION: APPEALS.
The action of the Chief of Police in revoking an alarm system
permit may be appealed to the City Council. Written notice of
such appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within fifteen
8.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(15) days following the service of the notice of revocation.
SECTION 17.55.13. PERMITS: REVOCATION: APPEALS: HEARING:
DETERMINATIONS.
The City Council shall hear and determine such appeal at its
next regular meeting held not less than seven (7) days following
the filing of the notice of appeal. Written notice of the time
and place of the hearing shall be served on the permittee in the
same manner as provided in this chapter for the service of a
notice of revocation. A majority vote of the whole Council shall
be required to reverse any revocation of an alarm system permit
ordered by the Chief of Police. Should the Council find that the
revocation of the permit was appropriate, the permittee may be
billed for all costs reasonably borne by the City in revoking the
alarm system permit.
SECTION 17.55.14. CHARGES FOR RESPONDING TO FALSE ALARMS,
BILLINGS, EXCEPTIONS.
(a) A service charge of $100 shall be paid to the City by
each subscriber or permittee of an alarm system, for each
response made by the Police or Fire Department to the location of
a false alarm after the first -5) responses are made during
A'tW
the same giscal year.
(b) The Director of Finance shall cause to be issued a
monthly bill for the unpaid service charges accrued during the
billing period and any prior periods. Such bill shall be due and
payable within fifteen (15) days after billing date.
(c) Exceptions: No charge shall be assessed for false
alarms occasioned by disaster, power failure or other causes
clearly not within the control of the permittee. No charges
shall be made for a false alarm occasioned by an alarm company or
9.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
permittee test of the alarm system, provided that the Police
Department has been notified before and after completion of said
test. No charge will be assessed for false alarms that occur
within thirty (30) days from the date when the alarm system was
originally installed and became operational. However, the per-
mittee may be charged the costs of disconnecting an alarm system
declared a nuisance under Section 17.55.02(c) of this chapter
regardless of the date of installation and operation.
(d) The provisions of this section do not apply to any
Federal, State, County or City agency, special district, or to
the Hermosa Beach Police Department which may be engaged in the
non-profit installation and maintenance of tactical alarm systems
utilized in crime suppression.
SECTION 17.55.15. FEES AND CHARGES CONSTITUTE A VALID AND
SUBSISTING DEBT.
(a) All fees and charges levied by the City pursuant to this
chapter shall be due and payable upon presentation of a written
invoice.
(b) All fees and charges for such services pursuant to this
chapter shall constitute a valid and subsisting debt in favor of
the City and against the permittee for whom such services are
rendered. If an amount remains unpaid after reasonable and prac-
tical attempts have been made by the City to obtain payment, a
civil action may be filed with the appropriate court for the
amount due and payable, together with any penalties, any related
charges and fees accrued due to non payment, and all fees and
charges required to file and pursue such civil action.
(c) Fees and charges shall be levied for recovering City
costs for notification and collection of delinquent accounts and
10.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
in amounts established by resolution of the City Council and
shall be collected as provided herein.
SECTION 17.55.16. MALFUNCTION REPAIR.
After any false alarm caused by a malfunction of the alarm
system equipment, an alarm system permittee shall cause the alarm
system to be repaired so as to eliminate such malfunction before
reactivating the alarm. No permittee shall reactivate such alarm
or cause the alarm to be reactivated, until such repairs have
been made and the alarm is in proper operating condition.
SECTION 17.55.17. MISCELLANEOUS.
(a) The provision of this ordinance relating to permits and
fees for installation and operation of alarm systems are ap-
plicable only to those installations made after the effective
date of this ordinance.
(b) The provision of this ordinance relating to false alarms
shall be in full effect as to all new and existing alarm systems
on the date that the ordinance takes effect.
(c) It shall be the obligation of the Permittee to maintain
any alarm system in good repair.
SECTION 17.55.18. SECTION 17.55.18. VIOLATION: PENALTY.
Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof,
shall be punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000.00, or by
imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or both
such fine and imprisonment.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in
full force and operation from and after thirty (30) days after
its final passage and adoption.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
11.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
adoption of this ordinance; shall cause the same to be entered in
the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute
of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of meeting at
which the same is passed and adopted; and shall within fifteen
days after the passage and adoption thereof cause the same to be
published once in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general
circulation, published and circulated within said City of Hermosa
Beach and which is hereby designated for that purpose.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this Day of April, 1989.
PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND MAYOR OF THE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
ATTEST: /APPROVED AS T
CITY CLERK
I Y ATTORNEY
12.
April 20, 1989
City Council Meeting
April 25, 1989
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
ORDINANCE NO. 89-980 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FROM
M-1, OPEN SPACE AND R-2 TO SPECIFIC PLAN AREA (SPA) FOR THE
PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND
ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGIATIVE DECLARATION. (603 FIRST
STREET - SPA NO. 3)
Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 89-980 relating to the
above subject.
At the meeting of April 11, 1989, this ordinance was introduced
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Concur:
Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson
Mayor Williams
None
None
Respectfully submitted,
Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk
evin B. Northpraft, City Manager
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO. 89 - 980
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FROM M-1, OPEN SPACE AND R-2
TO SPECIFIC PLAN AREA (SPA) FOR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW AND
SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
NEGATIVE DECLARATION. (603 FIRST STREET - SPA NO. 3)
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 11,
1989 and made the following Findings:
A. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of January 3, 1989,
approved a Conditional Use Permit and recommended a zone
change for a 13 unit condominium;
B. The City Council, at their meeting of February 14, 1989,
denied the proposed zone change and directed the Planning
Commission to study rezoning the subject area to R-1;
C. the area is Medium Density
D.
The General Plan designation for
Residential;
The adjacent parcels are zoned R-2 as are most
of
the
properties east of Ardmore Avenue in the immediate area;
E. The subject parcel is more in keeping with the size of the
adjacent Medium Density Residential properties rather than
the nearby Low Density Residential properties;
F. The proposed Specific Plan Area will allow for less lot
coverage, fewer curb cuts,"arid more parking;'
G. State Law requires consistency between the zoning and General
Plan;
H. The Specific Plan Area adopted by this ordinance shall allow
for a maximum number of eleven (11) dwelling units. The
number of dwelling units and lot coverage set for this
Specific Plan Area are basedupon the impact the plan area
would have, considering the total lot area, and its impact
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
upon the traffic and the surrounding neighborhood comprised
of smaller lots. Allowing a higher number of units on a
large parcel would adversely impact the surrounding
neighborhood with a disproportionate number of vehicle trips
and external impacts;
I. Rezoning the subject parcel to a Specific Plan Area for
eleven (11) dwelling units will result in consistency between
the zoning and General Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does
hereby ordain amending the Zoning Map as shown on the attached
maps and legally described as Lots 131 and 133 of Walter Ransom
Co's Venable Place Tract and a portion of Lots 41, and 42, Block
78, Second Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract (603 First Street) and
the following text shall be added to the Zoning Ordinance.
1. Article 9.6, Chapter 3, Specific Plan Area No. 3
Section 9.63-1. Authority.
This Specific Plan Area is an instrument for implementing the
General Plan pursuant to Article 8, Chapter 3, of the State
Planning and Zoning Law (California Goverment Code Sections
65450 et seq.).
Section 9.63-2. Location and Description.
The subject property is fronting on First Street and First
Place and is generally known as 603 First Street. The
property consists of four (4) lots, and has a total area of
26,319 square feet. Refer to attached map.
Section 9.63-3. Purpose.
The purpose of this Specific Plan Area is to set forth the
development requirements, standards and permitted uses for
the subject property.
Section 9.63-4. Permitted Uses.
The Permitted Use shall consist of a maximum of eleven (11)
dwelling units.
Section 9.63-5. Development Standards.
(a) Parking dimensions shall comply with Article 11.5 of the
zoning ordinance, and a minimum of two (2) parking
spaces per unit plus one additional guest space shall be
provided per dwelling unit.
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(b) A minimum ten (10) foot building setback shall be
provided along all prpoperty lines abutting a public
street.
(c) The lot coverage required for the Specific Plan Area
shall not exceed 32.60.
(d) All other standards including but not limited to open
space, placement of building, setbacks other than noted
above, and building height shall be governed by the
zoning ordinance, Article 5, R-2 Two -Family Residential
Zone, and Article 7.2, Condominiums, Stock Cooperative
and Community Apartments.
(e) Any residential use shall be subject to an approval of a
Conditional Use Permit.
2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force
and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final
passage and adoption.
3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date
of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to
be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of
general circulation published and circulated in the City of
Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law.
4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of
this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original
ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the
proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed
and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 25th day of April, 1989.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California.
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
T/ccrs6O3a
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
3
OVERVIEW
603 FIRST STREET
603 FIRST STREET
DETAILED MAP OF THE REZONING AREA
FROM M-1, OPEN SPACE & R-2 TO RESIDENTIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 3
/sT
• • SUBJECT
AREA
PCACd.
F/JJ/•
•
•
1,
1
M-1' V
•
131
Io
R
130
i9
129
• /F
.128.
0
127
®
126
O
125
O
. 124
/
' a0
123
�3
J9.81
el;
122 •
Ip
3043.•
71.601.41k"
0i0k , ti
414 w
•Grr
&W".
pit
133
••
pt
134
13
135
1i
136
1S
137
•
•
,
p6
138
•
O
139
•
®
140
,
IB
141
t.
•
40
.00.-
: Z9
142
I
4170
E%y. /ewe ofA.I [F Ry.SOW-Teat* / •
Pse 0•t. 1759-/S
•
•
•
STREET
April 20, 1989
City Council Meeting
April 25, 1989
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
ORDINANCE NO. 89-981 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP BY
CHANGING THE ZONE FROM M-1, AND OPEN SPACE TO RESIDENIAL SPECIFIC
PLAN AREA NO. 4 FOR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE
ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGIATIVE
DECLARATION. (540 FIRST STREET - SPA NO. 4)
Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 89-981 relating to the
above subject.
At the meeting of April 11, 1989, this
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Concur:
Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson
Creighton, Mayor Williams
None
None
ordinance was introduced
Respectfully submitted,
•
Kathleen Midst
City Cler
X16
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO. 89 - 981
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FROM M-1
AND OPEN SPACE TO RESIDENTIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 4 FOR THE
PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND
ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. (540 FIRST
STREET - SPA NO. 4)
WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on March 28
and April 1-]„ 1989 and made the following Findings:
A. State law requires consistency between the zoning and General
Plan;
B. Rezoning of the subject area from M-1 and Open Space to
Specific Plan Area will result in consistency between the
zoning and General Plan;
C. The property is adequate in size and shape for a Specific
Plan Area zoning;
D. The Specific Plan Area adopted by this ordinance shall allow
for a maximum number of ten (10) dwelling units. The number
of dwelling units and lot coverage set with this Specific
Plan Area is based upon the impact that maximum development
of the plan area would have, considering the total lot area,
and its impact upon the traffic and the surrounding
neighborhood comprised of smaller lots. Allowing a higher
number of units on a large parcel would adversely impact the
surrounding neighborhood with a disproportionate number of
vehicle trips and external impacts;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does
hereby ordain that the Zoning Map shall be amended to Residential
Specific Plan Area for the parcel shown on the attached maps and
legally described as a portion of lot 42, Block 78, Second
Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract (540 First Street), subject to
the following conditions:
The official Zoning Map shall be amended from M-1 and Open Space
to Specific Plan Area No. 4, and the following text shall be
added to the Zoning Ordinance:
1.. "Article 9.6, Chapter 4, Specific Plan Area No. 4
Section 9.64-1. Authority
This Specific Plan Area is an instrument for implementing the
General Plan pursuant to Article 8, Cbapeter 3,of the State
Planning and Zoning Law. (California Government Code Section
65450 et seq.).
Section 9.64-2. Location and Description
The subject property is fronting on 1st Street and has a side
property line adjacent to the Ardmore Avenue public
right-of-way. The site is 24,251 sq. ft. The property is
commonly known as 540 1st Street and is legally described as
a portionof lot 42, Block 78, Second Addition to Hermosa
Beach Tract.
Section 9.64-3. Purpose
The purpose of this Specific Plan Area is to set forth the
development requirements, standards, and permitted uses for
the subject property.
Section 9.64-4. Permitted Uses.
The Specific Plan Area shall allow for a maximum of ten (10)
dwelling units.
Section 9.64-5. Development Standards
1. The developments standards shall be similar to development
standards for the R-2 zone with the following
modifications:
a. One guest parking space shall be provided per unit.
b. A maximum of ten (10) dwelling units shall be permitted.
c. A minimum ten foot (10') setback shall be provided on 1st
Street.
d. The lot coverage required for the Specific Plan Area shall
not exceed thirty-two percent (327) of the overall area.
Section 9.64-6. Development Requirements
1. Any residential use shall be subject to approval of a
Conditional Use Permit."
2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force
and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final
passage and adoption.
3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date
of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to
be published in the Easy Reader, a' weekly newspaper of
general circulation publis ed and circulated in the City of
Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of
this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original
ordinances of said city, and shall make miniutes of the
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the
proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed
and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 25th day of Apri1,1989.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California.
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
t/pers540a
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
•
540 FIRST STREET
SUBJECT AREA
IST
`4
' c
Po
In
g3.
/ZOt °'.
380!- 5. ease.
740. •
1
o
HERONDO ST . __ .� slop
e
ERpNDO.
• !s 51• ..
,r. •
f\\ k1
�l. \N� vi
9
u
‘07-
0
Zi i V46 70:'•
6, 8404.. Z3 3�
ST•
2S
403.1 i
•
as 38
•
24
48'
to
40
-r
ta
5
•
e
A 1. Location
a: Address:
ACTIVITY illr;NTlriLATiuN
•
540 First Street
b. , Legal:A portion of Lot 42, Block 78, Second Addition to Hermosa
necacli lcacc
2. Descrtytion •
Conditional Use Permit & Vesting Tentative Tract Map #46826 for 10 -unit
condominium and zone change from M-1& Open Space to Specific Plan Area.
3. Sponsor,
a. Name: Thompson of California
•
b. Mailing Address: 2555 Dominguez Hill Drive
Phone:(213) 604-0289
NEGATIVE DECLARATION i
In accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City of Hermosa beach, which in
plements the California Environmental quality Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach,
the Environmental Review Committee must make an environmental review of all
. private projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planninc
• Commission must make an environmental review of all public projects proposes
to be undertaken within the City, which are subject to the Environmental
quality Act. This declaration is documentation of the review and, if it be-
comes final, no comprehensive Enviromnental Impact Report is required for
this project.
FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
_We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this prc
posed project in accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City Council. of
Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive
Environmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas-
ures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on
the environment. Documentation suppoii ng s finding is on file in the
.Building Department.
1-5-89
Date of Finding
Chai ; Envinmental Review Committee
FINDING OF THE PLANNIN COMMISSION -
We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro-
ject in accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City .Council of Hermosa
Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environ-
mental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation measures are
included in the project, it would not have a significant'effect on the en-
vironment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Build-
ing Department.
� 9 ,
Date r'lndi/ng Ch- man, Planning Commission
! 9
FINDING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
We have undertaken and completed an environmental Impact Review of this pro
posed project in accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City Council of
Hermosa Beach, and find this project does not require a comprehensive En-
vironmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas-•
ures are included in the project, it• would not have a significant effect on
the environment. Documentation suppor,ing this finding is on file in the
Building Department.
• Date of Findinv Mayor, Hermosa Beach City Council
MITIGATION MEASURES •
1. Tract map shall require dedication of land on First Street
for sidewalks as per Public Works Department's requirement.
2. Plans to show increased driveway width.
3. Relocation of pool equipment to minimize noise.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 11, 1989
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft
RE: Ordinance relating to nonconforming uses/buildings
As is noted in the City Manager comment on the agenda item, the
Building Director and I wish to add some comments to the staff
report and make suggested changes in the ordinance to clarify
what will no doubt be a tested ordinance during enforcement.
The attached ordinance updates the ordinance submitted with the
agenda item by clarifying language in Section 13-4 and 13-7. The
new language should improve clarity and reduce confusion in
interpreting the ordinance by future readers.
We also would like to express some concerns about the ordinance
as recommended by the Planning Commission. Section 13-7(C) al-
lows expansion of a violation of sideyard setback if three-
quarters of the block is so built. The Council may wish to con-
sider this expansion to be limited only to vertical (e.g., second
floors) rather than horizontal extension in the front or back
yards. Also, the 75% standard will be very difficult to deter-
mine precisely. Council should understand that it will be an
approximate finding (based on aerial maps). It will require an
applicant's considerable further effort if he disagrees with the
staff's approximate finding.
Regarding Section 13-8, relating to historical buildings, the •
ordinance implies that the determination of historical buildings
will be handled by the Planning Commission on a case by case ba-
sis. Staff feels that it is far preferable to have an es-
tablished criteria so that Planning Commissions over the years
will enforce consistently the standard. Staff will be preparing
a policy statement for consideration by the Planning Commission
to establish this criteria.
Regarding Section 1162(B), relating to expanding a nonconforming
structure with inadequate on-site parking, the Planning Commis-
sion recommendation is actually to allow additional construction
without increasing parking. The current code only allows 100
sq. ft. of construction without increasing parking, while the
recommendation is to allow 250 sq. ft. This "liberalizing" of
the exception to meeting parking standards increases the likeli-
hood of bedrooms being constructed, which may well increase park-
ing demand. We feel that maintaining the 100 sq. ft. exception
is preferable. The recommendation does provide two parking
spaces for existing dwellings (rather than one) be required to
expand beyond the "exception" square footage. If the Council
feels this increase makes the 100 sq. ft. exception too small, an
SUPPLEMENTAL.
INFORMATION
alternative would be to maintain the 100 sq. ft. limit for minor
additions for those dwellings with no on-site parking spaces and
allow up to 250 sq. ft. minor addition for an existing dwelling
with at least one parking space on-site.
Kevii'1 B. Northc . ft
City Manager
KBN/ld
CONCUR:
g,,
William Grove
Building and Safety Director
Mich e chubach
Planning Director
2
2
3
4
5
6
. 7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORIDNANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
ARTICLE 13, GENERAL PROVISION, CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS -
NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES, AND RELATED ORDINANCES AND
ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing of April 11,
1989 to receive oral and written testimony on this matter and
made the following Findings:
A. Sections 1300-1310 of the Hermosa Beach Zoning Code sets out
conditions and exceptions for nonconforming buildings and
uses;
B. The nonconforming sections referenced above have been
interpreted to allow for the demolition of significant
portions of structures while retaining the nonconforming
status of the building;
C. Allowing reconstruction of a building in a manner which
allows the property to retain its nonconforming status while
circumventing existing planning and development regulations
leads to continuation of the nonconformity for the life of
the new reconstructed building which compounds any current
parking, density, safety and other environmental problems
caused by continuation of such noconformities;
D. Current sections of said Article 13 are no longer valid as a
result of past amendments to the ordinance;
E. The existing ordinance has no provisions for historically
important structures which may be nonconforming as to use
and/or structure;
F. The existing ordinance is in need of revising for clarity and
consistency;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California does
hereby ordain adoption of the following amendments to Article 13
of the Zoning Ordinance:
SECTION 1. Amend Section number 1300 to number 13-1.
SECTION 2. Amend Section 1301 by deleting completely "Exception
1", changing the Section number to 13-2, and adding
the following:
"Enlargement of windows and door openings in interior
and exterior walls are considered minor and not
structural alterations; repairs and/or replacement to
plumbing, electrical wiring, similar work, and those
required by law or as determined by the Building
Director are not structural alterations."
SECTION 3. Amend Section 1302 by deleting completely "Exception
1", changing the Section number to 13-3, and adding
the following:
"Enlargement of windows and door openings in interior
and exterior walls are considered minor and not
structural alterations; repairs and/or replacement to
plumbing, electrical wiring, similar work, and those
required by law or as determined by the Building
Director are not structural alterations."
SECTION 4. Change the Section number of Section 1303 to 13-4 and
SECTION 5.
SECTION 6.
SECTION 7.
revise the wording as follows:
"If a nonconforming use is vacated or removed and it
is succeeded by another use, it is evident that the
nonconforming use was ended; it thereby immediately
loses any vested right to continue. A nonconforming
use may be succeeded by a use which is itself
nonconforming, provided the degree of nonconformity
is less intensive (e.g. requires less parking or
results in fewer dwelling units).
It is the intent of this section to allow for an
improvement in the degree of nonconformity of a use
utilizing existing structures. It is not intended to
allow the construction of new structures in violation
of the provisions of this code."
Change the Section number of Section 1304 to 13-5.
Delete Section 1306, Board of Zoning Adjustment to
Determine Conditions of Abatement.
Change the Section number of 1307 to 13-6 and add the
following sentence:
"The International Conference of Building Officials
valuation data shall be used in computing value."
2
SECTION 8. Amend Section 1309 by changing the title, the Section
number and the text as follows:
"Section 13-7, Conforming Use of a Nonconforming
Structure.
Intent and Purpose of this Section is to allow
remodeling and expansion to nonconforming residential
structures in sound condition in a manner that does
not ultimately result in significant removal of
existing structures. Where a structure is
significantly damaged by dryrot, termites, or similar
damage and removal of significant portions of the
structure is necessary or recommended, this ordinance
does not apply and expansion and/or remodeling is
prohibited. All nonconforming structures shall
require a termite and dryrot inspection by a bonifide
company, to determine the amount of structural
removal, if any, that will be necessary because of
damage.
Expansion to nonconforming manufacturing or
commercial structures is prohibited.
A. The following portions of the existing structure
may be removed:
(1) When adding additional stories, portions of
the roof as necessary may be removed.
(2) When adding to any side of a structure, walls
may be removed to enlarge existing rooms,
and/or to provide interior access as
necessary for logical expansion of the
existing structure. A maximum combination of
30% of the existing lineal feet of exterior
walls and/or floor area may be removed
whether necessitated by the inspection or by
the remodeling, or botb.
(3) Removal of any other portions of an existing
structure, other than those noted in
sub -sections (1) and (2) above, shall require
submittal of a demolition plan for review by
the Planning Commission to determine whether
the proposed plan meets the intent and
purpose of this Section.
B. Nonconforming structures may be expanded and/or
remodeled to a cumulative maximum of 50% of the
replacement cost of the existing structure(s) as
it existed on (effective date of ordinance) and
as determined by the Building Department which
shall use current Building Valuation Data
provided by the International Conference of
Building Officials (ICBG). When computing
remodeled area, i.e. relocation of interior
3
SECTION
SECTION
walls, the entire area affected by the relocation
of the wall shall be included in the computation.
For example, if a wall between the dining room
and kitchen is removed, the area counted includes
the dining room and kitchen area together.
C. Where existing walls are a minimum of, or more
than three (3) feet from the side property line
the wall may be expanded if at least seventy-five
(75) percent of the block as defined by the
zoning ordinance has the same or smaller
non -conforming sideyards (excluding commercial
and manufacturing uses)."
9. Add "Section 13-8, Nonconforming Historic Buildings.
A. A locally recognized historic building or
structure may be substantially preserved,
renovated or rebuilt subject to the issuance of a
Conditional Use Permit.
B. In reviewing the application for the historic
building or structure, the Planning Commission
shall evaluate and make Findings on the
following:
(1) The local historical significance of the
building or structure.
(2) The existing architecture_
C. In approving a Conditional Use Permit, the
Planning Commission may authorize such deviations
as necessary to preserve the structure and its
historical significance and impose conditions of
approval as deemed necessary."
10. Delete Section
Use of Land.
SECTION 11.
SECTION 12.
SECTION 13.
1310, Discontinuance of Nonconforming
Amend Section 1162(b) of the Article 11.5. Off -Street
Parking to state the following "...to require two (2)
parking spaces...." and "...During the life of --i
building and after (the effective date of this
ordinance) a single addition of not more than 250
square feet may be constructed without compliance to
this section."
This ordinance shall become effective and be in full
force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of
its final passage and adoption.
The City Council shall designate the City Attorney to
prepare a summary of this ordinance to be published
pursuant to Government Code Section 36933(c) (1) in
lieu of the full text of said ordinance. Prior to
the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
. 7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
- 15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary
to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly
newspaper of general circulation, published and
circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach.
SECTION 14. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
ATTEST:
adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in
the book of original ordinances of said city, and
shall make minutes of the passage and adoption
thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City
Council at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of
1989.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City
of Hermosa Beach, California
APPROED AS TO FORM:
P/ccornon
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
5
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
INFORMATION SHEET
NONCONFORMING USE AND STRUCTURES ORDINANCE
APRIL, 1989
1. Need for ordinance..
The City Councils of Hermosa Beach have taken many steps to
reduce the increasing number of residential units being
built in Hermosa Beach. These units can negatively affect
parking, traffic, and open space.
These actions were taken in response to a strong and sus-
tained public demand to prevent a degradation of the high
quality of life in our community. Since density is defined
as number of residential units per acre, many of the actions
have resulted in a considerable reduction of the potential
number of units allowed on lots within our City. Amendments
to the zoning code have also resulted in requirements for
increased off street parking, usable open space, and garage
setbacks.
Despite these actions particularly affecting new develop-
ments, existing development in Hermosa Beach is still very
dense. Parking, traffic, and lack of open space concerns in
developed areas of our community continue to be major public
concerns.
To allow a continuation and expansion of buildings in these
areas that do not meet current code creates potential for
aggravating these problems. This represents a substantial
loophole to accomplishing the goals of the many actions
designed to alleviate these problems.
At the same time, it is recognized that existing property
owners and residents must have some rights to improve their
property without tearing everything down and starting over.
The public issue now being discussed at the City Council
level is how to balance these conflicting needs into a rea-
sonable ordinance on nonconforming uses and structures.
2. Definitions
Sec. 239. Nonconforming building..
"Nonconforming building" means a building, or portion there-
of, which was lawfully erected or altered and maintained,
but which, because of the application of this ordinance to •
it, no longer conforms to the use, height or area regula-
tions of the zone in which it is located.
SUPPLEMENTAL
(Over) INFORMATION
s
Example: A building with a 2.5 ft. sideyard setback where
currently the sideyard setback required is 5 ft.
Sec. 240. Nonconforming use.
"Nonconforming use" means a use which was lawfully es-
tablished and maintained but which, because of the applica-
tion of this ordinance to it, no longer conforms to the use
regulations of the zone in which it is located.
Example(s): 1) A duplex in an R-1 zone;
2) A single family residence in a C-2 zone;
3) A four dwelling unit structure where current
density limitations would only allow a three
dwelling unit structure.
Section 250. Use.
"Use" means the purpose for which land or building is ar-
ranged, designed or intended, or for which either land or
building is or may be occupied or maintained.
3. Summary of Major Planning Commission Recommendations/Impact
on Residences
Existing nonconforming buildings will be able to be main-
tained to the expiration of their useful life. The ability
to add to or remodel existing nonconforming buildings will,.
be limited, thus encouraging removal of nonconforming hous-
ing stock and replacement with structures with adequate off
street parking, setbacks, usable open space, etc.
Existing nonconforming residential uses will also be able to
be maintained to the expiration of their useful life. No
additions to these structures will be allowed. Minor struc-
tural alterations will be allowed and alterations to plumb-
ing, electrical and mechanical systems will be allowed. The
more stringent limitations placed on nonconforming residen-
tial uses will encourage their replacement with or modifica-
tion to conforming uses at an earlier date.
J
Honorable Mayor and Members of the
Hermosa Beach City Council
April 3, 1989
Regular Meeting of
April 11, 1989
SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 87-9 AND 'TEXT AMENDMENT, ZONING
ORDINANCE REGULATIONS REGARDING NONCONFORMING USES
AND STRUCTURES
INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
The Planning Commission and staff recommend adoption of the
attached ordinance and an Environmental Negative Declaration.
Background
At the March 7, 1989 meeting, the Planning Commission adopted a
resolution recommending approval of a text amendment to modify
nonconforming uses and structures' article of the zoning
ordinance.
More background is provided in the attached Planning Commission
staff report of March 7, 1989.
Abstract
Adoption of this ordinance will essentially set parameters
relating to the demolition of nonconforming structures and
expansion based on the International Conference of Building
Officials (I.C.B.O.) building valuation. It prohibits the
expansion of nonconforming uses, and makes allowances for
buildings determined to have historical value. There is also
provisions for neighborhoods with nonconforming sideyards.
Analysis
An analysis and comparison chart of the existing ordinance and
the proposed ordinance are attached.
Since the Planning Commission meeting staff made one clerical
change which does not change the substantive intent of the
ordinance. Section 2 in the attached proposed ordinance includes
an additionalparagraph.
Staff assumed that it would be interpreted that a conforming
structure could have repair and/or replacement work since it was
in fact conforming, but it was indicated that someone may not
unless it was stated. Therefore, an identical paragraph was
included in Section 2 as it is in Section 3.
Attachments
1. Proposed ordinance No. 89-
2. P.C. staff report dated February 28, 1989
3. Comparison chart
4. Resolution P.C. 89-22
5. P.C. minutes of 3/7/89
6. Public notice
7. Correspondence
-I{JR
evin B. Northc
City Manager
P/ccsrnon
Respctfu,,su
Michael'Schubach
Planning Director
CITY MANAGER COMMENT:
The Building Director and I have several non -substantive suggestions
to the ordinance language to improve clarity and enforcement. These
changes will be reviewed with Planning and the City Attorney's office
and any appropriate revisions submitted prior to your 4/11/89 meeting.
2
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORIDNANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
ARTICLE 13, GENERAL PROVISION, CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS -
NONCONFORMING BUILDING'S AND USES, AND RELATED ORDINANCES AND
ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing of April 11,
1989 to receive oral and written testimony on this matter and
made the following Findings:
A. Sections 1300%11310 of, the Hermosa Beach Zoning Code sets out
conditions and exceptions for nonconforming buildings and
uses;
B. The nonconforming sections referenced above have been
interpreted to allow for the demolition of significant
portions of structures while retaining the nonconforming
status of the building;
C. Allowing reconstruction of a building in a manner which
allows the property to retain its nonconforming status while
circumventing existing planning and development regulations
leads to continuation of the nonconformity for the life of
the new reconstructed building which compounds any current
parking, density, safety and other environmental problems
caused by continuation of such.noconformities;
D. Current sections of said Article 13 are no longer valid as a
result of past amendments to the ordinance;
E. The existing ordinance has no provisions for historically
important structures which may be nonconforming as to use
and/or structure;
F. The existing ordinance is in need of revising for clarity and
consistency;
3
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California does
hereby ordain adoption of the following amendments to Article 13
of the Zoning Ordinance:
SECTION 1.
SECTION 2.
SECTION 3.
SECTION 4.
SECTION 5.
SECTION 6.
SECTION 7.
SECTION 8.
Amend Section number 1300 to number 13-1.
Amend Section 1301 by deleting completely "Exception
1", changing the Section number to 13-2, and adding
the following:
"Enlargement of windows and door openings .in interior
and exterior walls are considered minor and not
structural alterations; repairs and/or replacement to
plumbing, electrical wiring., similar work, and those
required by law or as determined by the Building.
Director are not structural alterations."
Amend Section 1302 by deleting completely "Exception'
1", changing the Section number to 13-3, and adding
the following:
"Enlargement of windows and door openings in interior
and exterior walls are considered minor and not
structural alterations; repairs and/or replacement to
plumbing, electrical wiring, similar work, and those
required by law or as determined by the Building
Director are not structural alterations."
Change the Section number of Section 1303 to 13-4 and
revise the wording as follows:
"If a nonconforming use is vacated or removed and it
is evident that the nonconforming use was ended; it
thereby immediately loses any vested right. If the
substitute use is itself nonconforming, the degree of
nonconformity may not be more intensive, e.g.,
require more parking, or be more dense, i.e., result
in more dwelling units."
Change the Section number of Section 1304 to 13-5.
Delete Section 1306, Board of Zoning Adjustment to
Determine Conditions of Abatement.
Change the Section number of 1307 to 13-6 and add the
following sentence:
"The International Conference of Building Officials
valuation data shall be used in computing value."
Amend Section 1309 by changing the title, the Section
number and the text as follows:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
"Section 13-7, Conforming Use of a Nonconforming
Structure.
Intent and•Purpose of this Section is to allow
remodeling and expansion to nonconforming residential
structures in sound condition in a manner that does
not ultimately result in significant removal of
existing structures. Where a structure is
significantly damaged by dryrot, termites, or similar
damage and removal of significant portions of the
structure is necessary or recommended, this ordinance
does not apply and expansion and/or remodeling is
prohibited. All nonconforming structures shall
require a termite and dryrot inspection by a bonifide
company, to determine the amount of structural
removal, if any, that will be necessary because of
damage.
Expansion to nonconforming manufacturing or
commercial structures is prohibited.
A. The following portions of the existing structure
may be removed:
(1) When adding additional stories, portions of
the roof as necessary may be removed.
(2) When adding to any side of a structure, walls
may be r6moved to enlarge existing rooms,
and/or to provide interior access as
necessary for logical expansion of the
existing structure. A maximum combination of
30% of the existing lineal feet of exterior
walls and/or floor area may be removed.
(3) Removal of any other portions of an existing
structure, other than those noted in
sub -sections (1) and (2) above, shall require
submittal of a demolition plan for review by
the Planning Commission to determine whether
the proposed plan meets the intent and
purpose of this Section.
B. Nonconforming structures may be expanded and/or
remodeled to a cumulative maximum of 50% of the
replacement cost of the existing structure(s) as
it existed on (effective date of ordinance) and
as determined by the Building .Department which
shall use current Building Valuation Data
provided by the International Conference of
Building Officials (ICBO). When computing
remodeled area, i.e. relocation of interior
walls, the entire area effected by the relocation
of the wall shall be included in the computation.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECTION 9.
SECTION 10.
SECTION 11.
SECTION 12.
•
SECTION 13.
C. Where existing walls are a minimum of, or more
than three (3) feet from the side property line
the wall may be expanded if at least seventy-five
(75) percent of the block as defined by the
zoning.:.ordinance has the same or smaller
non -conforming sideyards (excluding commercial
and manufacturing uses).
Add "Section 13-8, Nonconforming Historic Buildings.
A. A locally recognized historic building or
structure may be substantially preserved,
renovated or rebuilt subject to the issuance of a
Conditional Use Permit.
B. In reviewing the application for the historic
building or structure, the Planning Commission
shall evaluate and make Findings . onthe
following:
(1) The local historical significance of the
building or structure.
(2) The existing architecture.
C. In approving a Conditional Use Permit, the
Planning Commission may authorize such deviations
as necessary to preserve the structure and its
historical significance and impose conditions of
approval as deemed necessary."
Delete Section 1310, Discontinuance of Nonconforming
Use of Land.
Amend Section 1162(b) of the Article 11.5. Off -Street
Parking to state the following "...to require two (2)
parking spaces...." and "...During the life of --i
building and after (the effective date of this
ordinance) a single addition of not more than 250
square feet may be constructed without compliance to
this section."
This ordinance shall become effective and be in full
force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of
its final passage and adoption.
The City Council shall designate the City Attorney to
prepare a summary of this ordinance to be published
pursuant to Government Code Section 36933(c) (1) in
lieu of the full text of said ordinance. Prior to
the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of
its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary
to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly
newspaper of general circulation, published and
circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach.
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECTION 14. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in
the book of original ordinances of said city, and
shall make minutes of the passage and adoption
thereof in,the records of the proceedings of the City
Council at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of
1989.
ATTEST:
PRESIDENT of the City Council and„ MAYOR of the City
of Hermosa Beach, California
CITY CLERK
APPROED AS '0 ORM:
cornon
CITY ATTORNEY
4
February 28, 1989
Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach Planning Commission March 7, 1989
SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 87-9 AND TEXT • AMENDMENT, ZONING
ORDINANCE REGULATIONS REGARDING NONCONFORMING USES AND
STRUCTURES
INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution, and an
Environmental Negative Declaration.
Background
On May 12, 1987, the City Council adopted an interim ordinance
concerning nonconforming uses and/or structures which were
demolished more than 507. The interim ordinance was effective
for 45 days.
On June 23, 1987, the Staff submitted an alternative emergency
ordinance to City Council and recommended that this ordinance be
a model for the permanent ordinance. The City Council referred
this ordinance to the Planning Commission for study.
At the October 6, 1987 Planning Commission meeting, the Planning
Commission Requested that this matter be continued and that a
comparison chart be provided.
On March 1, 1988, the Planning Commission continued this matter
on request by staff to study this matter more in light of the
downzoning that was occurring.
On January 31, 1989, the City Council requested that zoning
standards be studied in relation to nonconforming structures.
Analysis
Nonconforming uses and structures Sections 1301 and 1309: The
Staff has contacted 13 cities concerning their nonconforming
ordinances; these ordinances were found to be of little use.
However, it was noted that most cities do not allow expansion to
nonconforming uses; only structures are allowed and mainly
residential structures only. .This approach seems the most
logical, especially in light of the City's density reduction
ordinance. Anyone with more units than allowed will most likely
opt to remodel and expand rather than demolish. The result will
be circumvention of the density reduction ordinance.
Further, if one of the intentions of allowing expansion to
nonconforming dwellings is to maintain some of the City's fine
older homes and thus some of the City's quaint character, then,
the proposed ordinance will help to accomplish that intent,
41.1
c c
whereas the current ordinance seriously fails. Without any
control as to the amount of expansion or the amount of removal of
the existing structure, existing dwellings are for example, being
converted from 900 square foot dwellings to 3,000 square feet,
two story dwellings with 'maximum allowed lot coylverage; the
characteristics of the original dwelling are all but obliterated
and many times only one parking space exist since only one is
required to remodel and expand an existing dwelling.
Manhattan Beach has experienced similar problems with
nonconforming uses and structures as Hermosa Beach has. Staff
has reviewed their ordinance and actual implementation and has
created a similar ordinance. which includes wording related to
the way that Manhattan Beach's ordinance is actually being
enforced. Essentially the proposed ordinance will limit
expansion to nonconforming residential structures only, and limit
demolition to only those portions of the structure actually
necessary for logical expansion. It also limits expansion t� 50%
of replacement cost of the existing structure. The value per
square foot of floor area is based on building valuation data
from the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO).
Remodeling of the existing structure is also limited as noted
above so that entire dwellings cannot be gutted, leaving only
exterior walls (also used in Manhattan Beach), and any expansion
or structural alterations will require that at least 2 parking
spaces per unit be provided.
Examples of 50%L Valuation Formula •
Example 1: Expansion only
Existing Dwelling Size:
(X) Cost per Square Foot
Total Value:
50% of Value:
Expansion Allowed:
($32,800 - $65.60)
Example 2: Remodeling & Expansion
Existing dwelling Unit Size
(X) Cost per Square Foot:
Total Value:
50% of Value:
Proposed 400 Sq. Ft. Remodel @
$29.50 per Square Foot:
Proposed 300 Sq. Ft. Expansion:
Total Cost:
Zoning Standards:
Currently, Section 1309 allows for expansion of structures as
long as the expansion complies with current standards, an
exception is; sideyards may be extended if they are not more than
10% smaller than the current sideyard required. This requirement
1000 square feet
$ 65.60
$ 65,600.00
$ 32,800.00
500 square feet
1000 square feet
$ 65.60
$ 65,600.00
$ 32,800.00
$ 11,800.00
$ 19,680.00
$ 31,480.00
(cost under 50%)
C C
has caused requests for variances primarily for the following
reasons:
1. All the other dwellings on the block have X' sideyards.
2. There is only a minor difference between the proposed
setback and the required.
3. It will cost more, and it looks odd to have the addition
offset.
4. Variances have been given before.
Staff believes that to allow existing setbacks to be maintained
and also extended will be an incentive to attempt remodeling and
will result in a status quo situation, i.e., old structures will
evolve over time into new structures incrementally with one
remodel project after another until the entire dwelling has been
replaced.
However, with the limitations proposed in the revised ordinance,
allowing the extension of existing sideyards may not have the
same results as noted above. Staff believes the proposed
limitations and the following conditions should be included when
allowing nonconforming sideyards to exist and be expanded.
1. Where existing walls are a minimum of more than three
(3) feet from the side property line, the wall may be maintained
and extended if at least seventy-five percent of the block, as
defined by the zoning ordinance, has the same or smaller
nonconforming sideyards (excluding commercial and manufacturing
uses).
Downzoned areas
Recently, many areas of the City were downzoned. Some of these
areas had significant new construction just prior to the
moratorium, and downzoning occurring. Although staff has not
proposed any exception for these new and now nonconforming
structures, the staff believes City Council should consider
possibly allowing reconstruction in cases of total destruction
resulting from fire or natural disaster without meeting new
standard for 10 years after the date of construction, or for some
other specified time.
Condominiums: Condominiums may be destroyed, by fire for
example, and have had a density which exceeds the currently
allowed number of units. If the property owners are not allowed
to rebuild to the same density, then which owners would lose
their air space? Although it may be legally acceptable for the
City to force a reduction in density, thereby eliminate some
property owners' air space, Staff believes that the social and
political factors are equally important to the legal aspect. The
stigma of displacing persons could ultimately lead to political
action at the State level to prohibit the elimination of housing
units.
Staff believes a good approach would be to require that the
reconstruction of a destroyed condominium meet all the minimum
current standards regarding open space, parking, setbacks,
A
c
height, lot coverage and any other standard in effect at the time
of reconstruction. Of course, the variance procedure would be
available if it were impossible for all the future standards to
be met. However, it is impossible at this time to know what
circumstances and standards in the future will be.
Section 1306: This section must have been inadvertently not
repealed when Section 1305 was repealed; Section 1305 specified
the date when nonconforming buildings were to be removed, and
this section (1306) designates the Board of Zoning Adjustment as
the body to determine when the building was established so that
the date of required removal could be determined. Obviously,
without Section 1305, there is no need for Section 1306.
Section 1301, Exce•tion 1: This section allows a residence in a
commercial or manufacturing building andzone to expand the use
and the building as long as R-3 standards are met. Staff
believes that this exception is neither logical nor desirable.
Allowing a residence to exist in the midst of a manufacturing
zone conflicts with the very nature and principles of zoning and
endangers the health, safety and welfare of the resident.
Commeercial, manufacturing and residential uses are seriously
incompatible except under very limited circumstances.
Both Building and Planning Staff have investigated where such
uses may exist in the City. Two were discovered: one at the NE
corner of Ardmore and 2nd Street; and one at the "elbow" of 1st
Street and Ardmore (Riviera Body Shop). These particular
residences are in the M-1 zone, in commercial/manufacturing
structures. Upon further investigation, both were discovered to
be illegal nonconforming structures since both were never legally
converted to residences; therefore, they would not fall under
Section 1301 since they are not only nonconforming, but also
illegal.
Sectapm 1302, Exception 1: This section, like Section 1301 noted
above, allows expansion of nonconforming residential uses in
commercial and manufacturing zones and also allows expansion of
over -density residential uses and structures. As noted earlier,
if residential nonconforming uses are allowed to expand, then the
density reduction effort will have been circumvented.
Also, this section is worded somewhat nonsensically since it
states that a "use" can be structurally altered; uses are not
structures.
Historical Structures: Currently, there are no provisions for
historically designated structures in the event they were damaged
by fire, etc. Staff, therefore, is proposing a new section which
would waive zoning requirements for historically d sig ated
structures when certain Findings are met. A
P/specstdy
Michaei`S4chu•ach
Planning Director
COMPARISON CHART
CURRENT ORDINANCE
•
Sec. 1301. Nonconforming use of conforming building.
The nonconforming use of a conforming building existing
'on the effective date of this ordinance. may be continued,
provided such nonconforming use shall not be expanded or
extended into any other portion of the conforming building
nor shall any structural alterations be madeexcept those
required by iaw. If such nonconforming use is vacated or
discontinued for ninety (90) consecutive days or more, any
future use of such building shall conform to the provisions of
the zone in which it is located.
Exception 1. Residential uses may be expanded or structurally
altered provided the expansion or alteration complies with the
regulations of the zone in which the use is located. Where the
residential use located in a "C" or "M" zone, any expansion
shall comply with the R-3 regulations. (Ord. No. N.S. 515, § ],
12-9-75; Ord. No. 84-776, § 1, 9-11-84)
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
Sec. 13-2 Nonconforming use of .conforming building.
The nonconforming use of a conforming building existing
on the effective date of this ordinance may be continued,
provided such nonconforming use shall not be expanded or
extended into any other portion of the conforming building!
nor shall any structural alterations be made except those
required by iaw. If such nonconforming use is vacated or
discontinued for'ninety (90) consecutive days or more, any
future use of such building shall conform to the provisions•of
the zone in which it is located. • •
Enlargement of windows and door openings in interior
and exterior walls are considered minor and not
structural alterations; repairs and/or replacement to
plumbing, electrical wiring, similar work, and those
required by law or as determined. by the Building.
Director are not structural alterations.
—1
.1
c
CURRENT ORDINANCE
Sec. 1302. Nonconforming use of a nonconforming building.
The nonconforming use of a *nonconforming building may be
continued, provided such nonconforming use shall not be expanded
or extended nor shall any structural alterations be made except
those required by law. If such nonconforming use is vacated or
discontinued for ninety (90) consecutive days or more, any. future
use of such building shall conform to -the provisions of the zone in
which it is located. • • • - • "• •
Exception 1. Residential uses maybe expanded or.structurally
altered provided -the expansion or alteration complies with the
regulations of the zone' in which- the use is located. Where the
residential use located in a "C" or "M" zone, any expansion
shall comply with R-3 regulations. (Ord. No. 84-776, § 2, 9-11-84)
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
Sec. 13-3 Nonconforming use of a nonconforming building.,
The nonconforming use of a nonconforming building may be
continued, provided such nonconforming use shall not be expanded
or extended nor shall any structural alterations be made except
those required by law. If such nonconforming use 'is vacated or
discontinued for ninety (90) consecutive days or more; any future - - -
use of such building shall conform to the provisions of the zone in
which it is located. •• • • "• . ••
"Enlargement of windows and door openings in interior
and• exterior walls are considered minor and not.
structural alterations; repairs and/or replacement to;
plumbing, electrical wiring, similar work, and those.
required by law or as determined by the Building
Director are not structural alterations."
CURRENT ORDINANCE
Sec. 1303. Change in status of nonconforming use.
If a nonconforming use is vacated or removed and is suc-
ceeded by another and more restrictive use it is evidence that
the heavier nonconforming use was ended and. thereupon im-
mediately loses any vested right as such. If the substitute use
is itself nonconforming, the degree of nonconformity may not
be subsequently increased by changing to a less restricted use.
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
Change the Section number of Section 1303 to 13-4 and
revise the wording as follows:
"If a nonconforming use is vacated or removed and it
is evident that the nonconforming use was ended; it
thereby immediately loses any vested right. If the
substitute use is itself nonconforming, the degree of
nonconformity may not be more intensive, e.g.,
require more parking,'. or be more dense, i.e., result
in more dwelling units."
•
i
f.... . . .• ..tat.i:u+h...r.-
C
CURRENT ORDINANCE
Sec. 1304. Nonconforming alcohol beverage establishment,
. on and off -sale.
This conditional use permit process, established pursuant toy
this ordinance, shall apply to establishments which sell alcohol
and fall into any category of use which requires a conditional use
permit in order to sell alcoholic beverages in the City of Hermosa
Beach. All establishments which do not possess a conditional use
permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages on the effective date of
Ordinance No. 86-865 shall be required to apply for a conditional
use permit within two (2) years of the effective date of this
ordinance.
Editor's note—It shouldbe noted that § 4 of Ord. No. 86`865, provides that
"This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and
after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption." Such ordinance
boars an adopting date of Dec. 16. 1986.
Upon the filing of an application, each establishment must
diligently prosecute its application and receive a conditional use,
permit under the standards in effect at the time of the effective
date of this'ordinance. Said application must be heard before the.
planning commission within six (6) months of the filing of the
application. Any applicant may be granted an extension of time
within which to receive their conditional use permit if they can
demonstrate to the planning commission there is good cause fo
an extension of time necessary to receive the permit.
If no permit is either sought or granted within the time periods
specified above, such establishment shall no longer have the
legal authority to sell alcoholic beverages within the boundaries)
of the City of Hermosa Beach. (Ord. No. 86-865, § 1, 12-16-86)
•
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
Changes Section number from Section 1304 to 13-5.
CURRENT
ORDINANCE
Se '306. Board of zoning adjustment tc ltermine condi-
tions of abatement.
When any nonconforming condition exists in any zone, other
than the nonconforming use of land when no structure is in-
volved, it shall be the responsibility of the board of zoning ad-
justment, on its own initiative, to fix a date upon which the
nonconforming building was established. If any • use that
would normally be designated as nonconforming but lies with-
in an area indicated on the zoning map as being in an area
containing an indicated potential classification for a zone in
which such use would be permitted, the abatement provi-
sions of the zoning ordinance as they would affect use would
not apply. It shall also be the responsibility of the board of
zoning adjustment to determine whether, by reason of struc-
tural alterations, or enlargements, or the installation of•major
. equipment designed into the building prior to the date this or-
dinance becomes applicable thereto, it is deemed necessary to
establish a later date. for abatement than that .prescribed
herein for the building itself in order to assure that the in-
vestment represented by such structural .alterations, enlarge-
ments or. equipment installations may be amortized. In per-
forming this function the board shall consider all pertinent
data in connection therewith to provide the opportunity for
the owner of record, or lessee if there be such, to present such
evidence as 'they may possess and which properly relates to
such case. When the date of abatement has been determined
the board, by resolution, shall establish such date and shall
set .forth such facts as bear upon the case upon which the
determination of such date of abatement is based, and shall
formally notify the owner of such nonconforming property
of the action of the board by mailing to such owner a copy of
the formally adopted resolution not later than ten (10) days
following the date of such action. (Ord. No. N.S. 509, § 1,
9-23-75)
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
.DELETED
-16-
CURRENT ORDINANCE
•
Sec. 1307. Reconstruction of nonconforming building partial-
ly destroyed.
A nonconforming building destroyed to the extent of not more
than fifty (50) percent of its reasonable replacement value at the
time'of its destruction by fire, explosion or other casualty or'Act
of God, or the public enemy, may be restored and the occupancy
or use of Such building or part thereof which existed at the time
of such partial destruction may be continued subject to all other
provisions of this article.
-PROPOSED ORDINANCE
Change the Section number of 1307 to 13-6 and add the
following sentence:
"The International Conference of Building Officials
valuation data shall be used in computing value."
' CURRENT
ORDINANCE
PROPOSED
ORDINANCE
Sec.' 1309. Existing nonconforming structures.
Existing structures which are nonconforming as to yards, lot
coverage, open space or height may be expanded or enlarged
provided the expansibn or enlargement complies with the regula-
tions of the zone in which the structure is located. Existing non-
conforming sideyards may to maintained with an addition pro-
vided the sideyard is not more than ten (10) percent smaller than
the current sideyard required. (Ord. No. N.S. 234, § 3, 2-6-62;
Ord. No. 84-776, § 4, 9-11.84)
"Section. 13-7, Conforming Ilse of a. Nonconforming
Structure;
Intent and Purpose of this Section is. to allow
remodeling. and expansion to nonconforming residential
structures in sound condition in a manner that does
not ultimately result in significant removal of
existing structures. Where a structure is
significantly damaged by dryrot, termites, or similar
damage and removal of significant portions of the
structure is necessary or recommended, this ordinance
does not "apply and expansion and/or remodeling is
prohibited. All nonconforming structures shall
require a'termite and dryrot inspection by a bonifide
company, to determine the amount of structural
removal, if any, that will be necessary because of
damage.
Expansion to nonconforming manufacturing or
commercial structures is prohibited.
A. The following portions of the existing structure
may be removed:
(1) When adding additional stories, portions of
the roof as necessary may be removed.
(2) When adding to any side of a structure, walls
may be removed to enlarge existing rooms,
and/or to provide interior access as
necessary for logical expansion of the
existing structure. A maximum combination of
30% of the existing lineal feet of exterior
walls and/or floor area may be removed.
(3) Removal of any other portions of an existing
structure, other than those noted in
sub -sections (1) and (2) above, shall require
submittal of a demolition plan for review by
the Planning Commission to determine whether
the proposed plan meets the intent and
purpose of this Section.
B. Nonconforming structures may be expanded and/or
remodeled to a cumulative maximum of 50% of the
replacement cost of the existing structure(s) as
it existed on (effective date of ordinance) and
as determined by the Building Department which
shall use current Building Valuation Data
provided by the International Conference of
Building Officials (ICBO). When computing
remodeled area, i.e. relocation of interior
walls, the entire area effected by the relocation
of the wall shall be included in the computation.
C. Where existing walls are a minimum of, or more
than three (3) feet from the side property line
the wall may be expanded if at least seventy-five
(75) percent of the block as defined by the
zoning ordinance has the same or smaller
non -conforming sideyards (excluding commercial
and manufacturing uses).
CURRENT ORDINANCE
•
Sec. 1310. Required discontinuance of nonconforming use of •
• land.
A nonconforming use of land where no structure thereon
is employed in such use, existing at the time this ordinance
takes effect, may be continued for a .period of not more than
two (2) years thereafter, provided:
(1) No nonconforming use of the land shall in any way be
expanded or extended either on the same or adjoining
property; and
(2) ' If the nonconforming use of land existing at the time
this ordinance takes effect is thereafter discontinued
for six (6) months or more, or changed, any future use
of such land shall conform with the provisions of this
ordinance.
•
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
DELETED
-iq
CURRENT ORDINANCE
NONEXISTENT
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
"Section 13— 8, Nonconforming Historic Buildings.
A. A locally recognized historic building or
structure may be substatially preserved,
renovated or rebuilt subject to the issuance of a
Conditional Use Permit.
B. In reviewing the application for the historic
building or structure, the Planning Commission
shall evaluate and make Findings on the
following: •
(1) The local historical significance of the
building or structure. '
(2) The existing architecture. .
C. In approving a Conditional Use Permit, the
Planning Commission may authorize such deviations
as necessary to preserve the structure and its
,.historical significance and impose conditions of
approval as deemed necessary."
-2.0-
•
J '
c
CURRENT ORDINANCE
Sec. 1162.. Off-street parking, requirements for new and ex-
isting construction.
(b) For every residential building hereafter which is structur-
ally altered to increase gross floor area, there shall be provided,
permanently maintained and permanently available, one (1) park-
ing space for each existing unit, including requirements for turn-
ing radius as provided by this article and parking standards
herein. During the life of a building g single addition of not more
than one hundred (100) square feet may be constructed without
compliance with this section.
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
Sec. 1162. Off-street parking, requirements for new and existing
construction.
(b) For every residential building hereafter which is
structurally altered to increase gross floor area, there shall be
provided, permanently maintained and permanently available, two
(2) parking spaces for each existing unit, including requirements
for turning radius as provided by this article and parking
standards herein. During the life of a building and after (the
effective date of this ordinance) a single addition of not more
than two hundred and fifty (250) square feet may be constructed
without compliance with this section.
•
BACKGROUND.
414TER141
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
RESOLUTION P.C: 89-22
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REGOMMENDING AMENDING ARTICLE 13, GENERAL
PROVISION, CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS - NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS'
AND USES, AND RELATED ORDINANCES AND ADOPTING• ENVIRONMENTAL
NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing
of March 7, 1989 to receive oral and written testimony on this
matter and made the following Findings:•
A. Sections 1300-1310 of the Hermosa Beach Zoning Code sets out.
conditions and exceptions for nonconforming buildings and
uses;
B. The nonconforming sections referenced above have been
interpreted to allow for the demolition of significant
portions of structures while retaining the nonconforming
status of the building;
C. Allowing reconstruction of a building in a manner which
allows the property to retain its nonconforming status while
circumventing existing planning and development regulations
leads to continuation of the nonconformity for the life of
the new reconstructed building which compounds any current
parking, density, safety and other environmental problems
caused by continuation of such noconformities;
D. Current sections of said Article 13 are no longer valid as a
result of past amendments to the ordinance;
E. The existing ordinance has no provisions for historically
important structures which may be nonconforming as to use
and/or structure;
F. The existing ordinance is in need of revising for clarity and
consistency;
c c
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby
recommend adoption of the following amendments to Article 13
of the Zoning Ordinance:
SECTION 1.
SECTION 2.
SECTION 3.
SECTION 4.
SECTION 5.
SECTION 6.
SECTION 7.
SECTION 8.
•
Amend Section number 1300 to number 13-1.
Amend Section 1301 by'deleting completely "Exception
1", and changing the Section number to 13-2.
Amend Section 1302 by deleting completely "Exception
1", changing the Section number to 13-3, and adding
The following:
"Enlargement of windows and door openings in interior
and exterior walls are considered minor and not
structural alterations; repairs and/or replacement to
plumbing, electrical wiring, similar work, and those
required by law or as determined by the' Building
Director are not structural alterations."
Change the Section number of Section 1303 to 13-4 and
revise the wording as follows:
"If a nonconforming use is vacated or removed and it
is evident that the nonconforming use was ended; it
thereby immediately loses any vested right. If the
substitute use is itself nonconforming, the degree of
nonconformity may not be more intensive, e.g.,
require more parking, or be more dense, i.e., result
in more dwelling units."
Change the Section number of Section 1304 to 13-5.
Delete Section 1306, Board of Zoning Adjustment to
Determine Conditions of Abatement.
Change the Section number of 1307 to 13-6 and add the
following sentence:
"The International Conference of Building Officials
valuation data shall be used in computing value."
Amend Section 1309 by changing the title, the Section
number and the text as follows:
"Section 13-7, Conforming Use of a Nonconforming
Structure.
Intent and Purpose of this Section is to allow
remodeling and expansion to nonconforming residential
structures in sound condition in a manner that does
not ultimately result in significant removal of
existing structures. Where a structure is
significantly damaged by dryrot, termites, or similar
damage and removal of significant portions of the
structure is necessary or recommended, this ordinance
does not apply and expansion and/or remodeling is
prohibited. All nonconforming structures shall
require a termite and dryrot inspection by a bonifide
company, to determine the amount of structural
removal, if any, that will be necessary because of
damage.
Expansion to nonconforming manufacturing or
commercial structures is prohibited.
A. The following portions of the existing structure
may be removed:
(1) When adding additional stories, portions of
the roof as necessary may be removed.
(2) When adding to any side of a structure, wall's
may be removed to enlarge existing rooms,
and/or to provide interior 'access as
necessary for logical expansion of the
existing structure. A maximum combination of
30% of the existing lineal feet of exterior
walls and/or floor area may be removed.
(3) Removal of any other portions of an existing
structure, other than those noted in
sub -sections (1) and (2) above, shall require
submittal of a demolition plan for review by
the Planning Commission to determine whether
the proposed plan meets the intent and
purpose of this Section.
B. Nonconforming structures may be expanded and/or
remodeled to a cumulative maximum of 50% of the
replacement cost of the existing structure(s) as
it existed on (effective date of ordinance) and
as determined by the Building Department which
shall use current Building Valuation Data
provided by the International .•Conference of
Building Officials (ICBG). When computing
remodeled area, i.e. relocation of interior
walls, the entire area effected by the relocation
of the wall shall be included in the computation.
C. Where existing walls are a minimum of, or more
than three (3) feet from the side property line
the wall may be expanded if at least seventy-five
(75) percent of the block as defined by the
zoning ordinance has the same or smaller
non -conforming sideyards (excluding commercial
and manufacturing uses).
SECTION 9. Add "Section 13-8, Nonconforming Historic Buildings.
A. A locally recognized historic building or
structure may be substantially preserved,
r•
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
SECTION 10.
SECTION 11.
c
renovated or rebuilt subject to the issuance of a
Conditional Use Permit.
B. In reviewing the application for the historic
building or structure, the Planning Commission
s.hall evaluate and make Findings on the
following:
(1) The local historical significance of the
building or structure.
(2) The existing architecture.
C. In approving a Conditional Use Permit, the•
Planning Commission may authorize such deviations
as necessary to preserve •the structure and its
historical significance and impose conditions of
approval as deemed necessary."
Delete Section 1310, Discontinuance of Nonconforming
Use of Land.
Amend•Section 1162(b) of the Article 11.5. Off -Street
Parking to state the following "...to require two (2)
parking spaces...." and "...During the life of
.building and after (the effective date of this
ordinance) a single addition of not more than 250
square feet may be constructed without compliance to
this section."
VOTE: AYES: Comms.Edwards,Ketz,Rue,Chmn.Peirce
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 89-22 is a
true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning
Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their
regular meeting of March 7, 1989. -- -"', ., f' /
---/1"., _e.,(.4 -1....-A-- AD -74/ ,
Jaip s Peirce, Chairman Michael Schubach
yf "7 A -Ac/ -r `l
Date
P/persnon
Secretary
1
t
c
SPECIAL STUDY 87-9 AND TEXT AMENDMENT, ZONING ORDINANCE REGULATIONS
REGARDING NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES
Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated February 28, 1989. Staff recommended adoption of
the proposed resolution and an environmental negative declaration.
P.C. Minutes 3/7/89
c
c
On May 12, 1987, the City Council adopted an interim ordinance concerning
nonconforming uses and/or structures which were demolished more than .50 percent. The
interim ordinance was effective for 45 days.
On June 23, 1987, the staff submitted an alternative emergency ordinance to the City
Council and recommended that this ordinance be a model for the permanent ordinance.
The City Council referred this ordinance to the Planning Commission for study.
At the October 6, 1987, Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission required
that this matter be continued and that a comparison chart be provided,
On March 1, 1988, the Planning Commission continued this matter on request of staff so
that staff could study the matter more in light of the downzoning which was occurring.
On January 31, • 1989, the City Council requested that zoning standards be studied in .
relation to nonconforming structures.
Nonconforming Uses and Structures -- Sections 1301 and 1309
The staff has contacted 13 cities regarding their nonconforming ordinances; these
ordinances were found to be of little use. However, it was noted that most cities do not
allow expansion to nonconforming structures; only structures are allowed and mainly
residential structures only. This approach seems to be the most logical, especially in
light of the City's density reduction ordinance. Anyone with more units than allowed will
most likely opt to remodel and expand rather than demolish. The result will be
circumvention of the density reduction ordinance.
•
Further, if one of the intentions of allowing expansion to nonconforming dwellings is to
maintain some of the City's fine older homes and thus some of the City's quaint
character, then the proposed ordinance will help to accomplish that intent;. whereas, the
current ordinance seriously fails. Without any control as to the amount of expansion or
the amount of removal of the existing structure, existing dwellings are, for example,
being converted from 1900 square -foot dwellings to 3000 square -foot, two-story
dwellings with a maximum allowed lot coverage. The characteristics of the original
dwelling are then all but obliterated, and many times only parking space exists since only
one is required to remodel and expand an existing dwelling.
Manhattan Beach has experienced similar problems with nonconforming uses and
structures as Hermosa Beach has. Staff has reviewed their ordinance and actual
implementation and has created a similar ordinance which includes wording related to
the way that the Manhattan Beach ordinance is actually being enforced. Essentially, the
proposed ordinance will limit expansion to nonconforming residential structures only, and
will limit demolition to only those portions of the structure actually necessary for logical
expansion. It also limits expansion to 50 percent of replacement cost of the existing
structure. The value per square foot of floor area is based on building valuation data
from the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBG).
Remodeling of the existing structure is also limited, as noted, so that entire dwellings
cannot be gutted, leaving only exterior walls (also used in Manhattan Beach), and any
expansion or structural alterations will require that at least two parking spaces per unit
be provided.
_ 2 7- P.C. Minutes 3/7/89
c c
Zoning Standards
Currently, Section 1309 allows for expansion of structures as long as the expansion
complies with current standards. An exception is that sideyards may be extended if they
are not more than 10 percent smaller than the current sideyard required. This
requirement has caused requests for variances primarily for several reasons: (1) all the
other dwellings on the block have the same sideyards; (2) there is only a minor difference
between the proposed setback and the required setback; (3) it will cost more, and it looks
odd to have the addition offset; and (4) variances have been given before.
•
Staff believes that to allow existing setbacks to be maintained and also extended will be
an incentive to attempt remodeling and will result in a status quo situation; i.e., old
structures will evolve over time into new structures incrementally with one remodel
project after another until the entire dwelling has been replaced. •
However, with the limitations proposed in the revised ordinance, allowing the extension
of existing sideyards may not have the same results as noted. Staff believes the proposed
limitations and the following conditions should be included when allowing nonconforming
sideyards to exist and be expanded. (1) Where existing walls are a minimum of more
than three feet from the side property line, the wall may be maintained and extended if
at least 75 percent of the block, as defined by the zoning ordinance, has the same or
smaller nonconforming sideyards (excluding commercial and manufacturing uses).
Downzoned Areas
Recently, many areas of the City were downzoned. Some of these areas had significant
new construction just prior to the moratorium and downzoning occurring. Although staff
has not proposed any exception for these new and now conforming structures, staff
believes City Council should consider possibly allowing reconstruction in cases of total
destruction resulting from fire or natural disaster without meeting new standards for ten
years after the date of construction, or for some other specified time.
Condominiums
Condominiums may be destroyed by fire, for example, and have had a density which
exceeds the currently allowed number of units. If the property owners are not allowed to
rebuild to the same density, then which owners would lose their air space?. :Although it
may be legally acceptable for the City to force a reduction in density, thereby
eliminating some property owners' air space, staff believes that the social and political
factors are equally important to the legal aspect. The stigma of displacing persons could
ultimately lead to political action at the State level to prohibit the elimination of
housing units.
Staff believes a good approach would be to require that the reconstruction of destroyed
condominiums meet all the minimum current standards regarding open space, parking,
setbacks, height, lot coverage, and any other standard in effect at the time of
reconstruction. Of course, the variance procedure would be available if it were
impossible for all the future standards to be met. However, it is impossible at this time
to know what circumstances and standards might be in the future.
Section 1306
This section must have been inadvertently not repealed when Section 1305 was repealed;
Section 1305 specified the date when nonconforming buildings were to be removed, and
P.C. Minutes 3/7/89
this section (1306) designates the Board of Zoning Adjustments as the body to determine
when the building was established so that the date of required removal could be
determined. Obviously, without Section 1305, there is no need for Section 1306.
Section 1301, Exception 1
This section allows a residence in a commercial or manufacturing building and zone to
expand the use and the building as long as R-3 standards are met. Staff believes that this
exception is neither logical nor desirable. Allowing a residence to exist in the midst of a
manufacturing zone conflicts with the very nature and principles of zoning and endangers
the health, safety, and welfare of the resident. Commercial, manufacturing, and
residential uses are seriously. incompatible except under very limited circumstances.
Both Building and Planning staff have. investigated where such use may exist in the
City. Two were discovered: (1) at the northeast corner of Ardmore and 2nd Street; and
(2) at the "elbow" of 1st Street and Ardmore (Riviera Body Shop). These particular
residences are in the M-1 zone in commercial/manufacturing structures. Upon further
investigation, both were discovered to be illegal nonconforming structures since neither
was ever legally converted into residences; therefore, they would not fall under Section
1301 since they are not only nonconforming, but also they are illegal.
Section 1302, Exception 1
This section, like Section 1301, allows expansion of nonconforming residential uses in
commercial and manufacturing zones and also allows expansion of over -density
residential uses and structures. As noted, if residential nonconforming uses are allowed
to expand, then the density reduction effort will have been circumvented.
•
Also, this section is worded somewhat nonsensically since it states that a "use" can be
structurally altered, and uses are not structures.
Historical Structures
Currently, there are no provisions for historically designated structures in the event they
are damaged by fire, etc. Staff, therefore, is proposing a new section which would waive
zoning requirements for historically designated structures when certain findings are met.
Public Hearing opened and closed at 9:34 P.M. by Chmn. Peirce as no one appeared to
address this issue.
Chmn. Peirce suggested that each section be discussed individually.
Mr. Schubach explained that some of the sections to be changed will merely have the
numbers changed so that the numbering sequence is consistent in the municipal code and
zoning code.
Section 1301 -- Nonconforming Use of a Nonconforming Building
Chmn. Peirce stated that the staff proposal for Section 1301 needs no changes or
corrections.
— 241
P.C. Minutes 3/7/89
C C
Section 1302 -- Nonconforming Use of a Nonconforming Building
Chmn. Peirce stated that the staff ' proposal for Section 1302 needs no changes or
corrections.
Section 1303 — Change in Status of Nonconforming Use
Chmn. Peirce directed staff to rewrite this section so that the wording is more clear and
precise.
Section '1304 -- Nonconforming Alcohol Beverage Establishment, On and Off -sale
Chmn. Peirce stated that the staff proposal for Section 1304. needs no changes or
corrections.
Section 1306 -- Board of Zoning Adjustment to Determine Conditions of Abatement
Chmn. Peirce stated that the staff proposal for Section 1306 needs no change.
Section 1307 -- Reconstruction of Nonconforming Buildings Partially Destroyed
Chmn. Peirce directed staff to add wording specifying that the ICBG building evaluations
can be used.
Section 1309 -- Existing Nonconforming Structure
Comm. Ketz asked about the requirement for a termite inspection.
Mr. Schubach explained that a termite inspection is deemed appropriate because many
times when people begin a remodel or expansion of an older building, they discover
problems with dry rot and/or termites. They then demolish more than is allowed by the
code in order to repair the damaged sections. Mandatory termite inspections will
eradicate some of the problems which have been experienced in the past. He said these
problems arise regularly, in approximately 50 percent of the remodels of older homes.
He was not certain of the exact cost of a termite inspection; however, he did not think it
was excessive.
Chmn. Peirce suggested that the termite inspection be tied into wording regarding the
removal of wood. He noted that an inspection could be expensive.
Comm. Rue suggested wording specifying that after construction has begun, if the
Building Department finds that substantial sections have been removed, the project can
then be reevaluated.
Mr. Schubach stated that an applicant could then be halfway through a project before
discovering major projects.
Chmn. Peirce stated that requiring a terminate inspection closes a loophole in the
system. He noted concern over reconstruction, however, because an applicant could get
the inspection but still build something which differs from the submitted plans. He did
not understand the advantage of obtaining the termite inspection.
Mr. Schubach explained that a termite inspection would reveal how much of the existing
building needs to be removed.
30-
P.C. Minutes 3/7/89
C
Mr. Schubach, for clarification, addressed several hypothetical questions posed by the
Commission in regard to demolitions.
Chmn. Peirce stated that the main issue covered in this section is: if a house is
structurally damaged, should someone be allowed to rebuild the structurally damaged
portion back to the exact same thing and not consider it part of reconstruction.
Comm. Rue stated that the best solution to this problem appears to be for the City to
require a termite report and state from the beginning that the building can either.remain
as is; and if the building is remodeled, then it must conform to the current standards.
Comm. Ketz discussed Section A(2); i.e., "A maximum combination of 25 percent of the
lineal feet of exterior walls and/or floor area may be removed." She asked for
clarification on how the percentage would be determined.
Mr. Schubach explained how the percentage is figured on removals. He said that staff
determined 25 percent to be a reasonable figure. He stated that Manhattan Beach does
not use the 25 percent.
Mr. Schubach and the Commissioners discussed the various percentages which could be
used and their impact.
Chmn. Peirce directed staff to change the percentage in Section A(2) to 30%.
Section 1310 — Required Discontinuance of Nonconforming Use of Land
Mr. Schubach, in response to questions from the Commission, explained that this section
pertains to uses of land as opposed to uses of structures. He said it was very useful in
years gone by for such things as traveling carnivals, horses, and various other outdoor
uses.
Mr. Lough stated that by today's standards, this section could apply
parked on City streets or vacant lots.
Chmn. Peirce stated that this section is not necessary, explaining that
section. It states that nonconforming uses must be abated within two
section is more than two years old, the nonconforming use should not be
Chmn. Peirce stated that the issue of cars being stored
zoning code.
to cars for sale
this is a very old
years. Since the
allowed.
illegally is addressed by the
Chmn. Peirce directed staff to delete this section.
Section 13-10 -- Nonconforming Historic Buildings
Comm. Edwards noted a typo in Section A: "substantially."
Section 13-11 Condominium Reconstruction
Mr. Schubach and the Commissioners discussed options available in
condominium burns down. Mr. Lough stated that most other cities use
proceed option.
-31-
the event a
the insurance
P.C. Minutes 3/7/89
( C
Comm. Rue noted concern over inclusion of such a section, noting that it may not be
desirable to rebuild some units if they were built under much higher density standards.
Comm. Rue suggested that • homeowners associations could make provisions in the•
CC&R's as to what would happen in the event a condominium building .is totally
destroyed.
Mr. Schubach stated that inclusion in the CC&R's of provisions in the event of
destruction would be a good idea. He stated he would like to study this option further.
Comm. Rue suggested that these matters be studied. on a case -bye -case basis.
Chmn. Peirce directed staff to omit this section entirely.
Section 1162 — Off-street parking requirements for new and existing construction
Comm. Ketz noted that many additions could not be done because the applicant cannot
provide the required parking. She felt that a 100 square -foot addition would not be worth
doing if additional parking is required.
Chmn. Peirce stressed that a •major concern in the City involves the parking situation,
and people should not be allowed to expand if they cannot meet the current parking
standards.
Chmn. Peirce directed staff to amend this section so that it reads: "....During the life of
a building a single addition of not more than 250 square feet maybe constructed without
compliance to this section."
MOTION by Chmn. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Rue, to direct staff to incorporate -the
above-mentioned changes into the resolution, P.C. 89-22.
AYES: Comms. Edwards, Ketz, Rue, Chmn. Peirce
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Comm. Ingell
•
— 32 — P.C. Minutes 3/7/89
EASY READER
RUN DISPLAY DATE: March 30, 1989
DISPLAY
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach•
shall hold a public hearing on April 11, 1989 to consider the following:
1. Text amendment regarding nonconforming uses and structures and adoption
of the Environmental Negative Declaration.
2. Zone change from R-2, M-1 and Open Space to either R-1, R-2, Specific
Plan Area or to such other zone as deemed appropriate by the City Council
& Environmental Negative Declaration at 603 First Street.
3. A moratorium on the issuance of Building Permits and Conditional Use
Permits for video sales and rentals in C-1 and C-2 zones.
•
SAID PUBLIC HEARING shall be at 8:00 PM in the City Hall Council Chamber,
1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254.
ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested are invited to participate at that time and
place or to write to the City Council in care of the Planning and
Environmental Services Department at the above address PRIOR to:Thursday,
April 6, 1989 at 12:00 noon
IF YOU CHALLENGE the above matter(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the
Planning Department at, or prior to, the public hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact the Planning Department at
318-0242.
KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE
CITY CLERK
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
at/ziuc--/e4-y
4a cc fres /4
.J&L 4d3c /11St _
ake
4d-9 Ik s2ri2() .F 4.1 •
colt7v, /21 rij) avd/ cz-f /te _
viNoti 44e° 64.0.7.17
e/iecc.p,7en,
ce"-/0.1 Actitses- _ _
d)14YLU4/C/S PoWS _ 4 a //Y x/S• ek-/.74‘7'v i f ,r/_4 -c. _
0 0_7- _j- .4e/ikl,
— — ------ - - -I - ---- --- ----- - - --- - - —
j:-., e- / • .(44 .1/ le_1_
_
/g/ip-01,re n4 ._kv,v'
• i,,-•,
g3q\J 830 -
Cr4)LL k-/-6 As. EGeNi big ass/ et_e.
frePici A rE Verel frvarA.4 . 7-Atinv/cc.
-3(1.
77?
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager
FROM: Michael Schubach, Pladp irector
SUBJECT: "Grandfather" for Nonconforming Projects
DATE: April 19, 1989
A "Grandfather" clause may be necessary since such a clause was
placed in the moratorium ordinance. Applicants may be caught
between the cut-off date in the moratorium grandfather clause and
the date the revised nonconforming ordinance becomes effective.
In other words they had a Building Permit package submitted by
the moratorium deadline, but did not obtain Building Permits
prior to the effective date of the revised ordinance.
Recommendation
Add the following section to the revised ordinance:
"Exceptions. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects
that have a completed building permit package on file with
the City prior to March 14, 1989. Said package must include
a completed building permit application form, completed con-
ceptual plan (plot plan, floor plan, elevation plans, and
similar plans, and a lot survey). Projects that have submit-
ted a completed building permit package must pursue their
application in a diligent manner and must be issued a build-
ing permit within six months of March 14, 1989."
CONCUR:
Kevin B. Northcr:ft
City Manager `
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
s
r
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Membersofthe City Council
FROM: Michael Schubach, P nn Director
SUBJECT: Flexibility in Allowing Expansions of Nonconform-
ing Structures
DATE: April 11, 1989
The proposed ordinance may be too inflexible in some unusual
cases. And therefore, possibly, the following modification may
be useful:
The Planning Commission may allow expansions greater than 5070,
but not more than 10070, if it is determined that the intent and
purpose of this section has been met. The Planning Commission
shall develop criteria confirmed by the City Council for making
determinations.
Kevin B. Nortticraft
City Manager
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
s
•:c..A•'> ••C.••os
GLCrr • •••'f 7r
41oer. : .r
..y` . Or es..Cr
./. f V•UG..•..
OOuC_•S .. ••GLC
r••. .•-aCr
A•N0.J s -Or
••T••CA C. C�JG•`LAN
LCC T. ••TC•SC
•..u..: . O•rt.
044C_J
roto A. rcrs-E•
ALL(.. C. e! ..E ^►
STtv(N L. D_eSC`
snLL•-r. •-3.4,32
*carry' N so ra co
•NTI+Crt! JeC •�••
M•TCwE�: C. • Se:"
Tt•/CTM♦ `• N! Jrt.0
3.0E341,`. S'C e•r•C C..
•OC..C.LC ee'>wrC
000.4k4..
•4I1ON w•• yE.wrOD
MAA .0 rC : CA.
MIGM•CL JC... •r3
MAP•aNNC GC Cow...
JErr•Ct 613 w'1
T(•CSA •.'RACt
Cl./•N•• M. $••POW
OCSC•A- S. GEPSl.ON
9Ce4 ANN rAt..CT I
JAMES C...•LL
CCILC.• N J 00431*. 44.
CA1OL .1t LTNC•••
$' u•1. O. LAU"S C.•
JCrrOCT L_Or0 PI(MONT
1.AU3CN SCY14011•
RICHAROS, WAS SON, DREYrUSS & GERSHON
ATTOQN ET AT LAW
A MOPESS.O..A. CJAACNAT:ON
April 19, 1983
Members of the City Council
City of Hermosa Beach
Civic Center
1315 Valley .Drive
Hermosa Beach., California 90254
TNIRTY-CIGMT.I /LOO•
3.3 &QuTM No.( ST•CCT
1.01 AMOCLC$. CAL.rO•NIA •0071
13131 efe 6441•
CASLC •OO•Css
•1CMWAT
er COurs4
OIL$Cwr O•(Trls$. IMC
•OMALO M
• •e/004Ay m••OINFM•
J1•MC3 r.
Re: Civil Service Positions
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council:
You have requested our opinion regarding the
validity of removing department Heads from the City's civil
service system, and appointing -approximately 80 other
employees without complying with civil service requirements.
These issues -are the subject of considerable
concern on the part of several residents, who have indicated
that they intend to challenge the City's actions in court
and to ask the court to impose personal liability on members
of the City Council for reimbursement to the City of compensa-
tion paid to employees found to have been appointed in
violation of the City's civil service rules and regulations.
The residents are not only.questioning the status of the
department heads but also that of many 'other -employees
including police officers, clerical staff, and maintenance
workers.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Our opinion is based on the following facts
provided by the City:
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION 9
TRT27-2B
Members of the City Council
April 19, 1983
Page Two
On June 7, 1960, through the initiative process,
the electorate of the City approved the creation of a civil
service system to cover all City employees, excluding only
elected officials, appointed commissioners, volunteers,
emergency, and part-time employees. This ordinance contains
no provisions for the withdrawal of department heads or for
the amendment of the ordinance.
In 1970, the State Legislature amended Government
Code Section 45007 to allow positions to be removed from
civil service by either a 2/3 vote of the electorate or by a
majority vote of the City Council by adding a clause which
provided: ". . regular full-time city department heads
may be withdrawn by a majority vote of the City Council."
Thereafter, the City Attorney forwarded a memorandum to the
City Manager stating that in his opinion the City Council
could not remove positions from the civil service system
because the system was adopted by initiative. The City
Attorney concluded that the removal of such positions could
only be done by submitting the matter to the voters.
Nevertheless, in January 1974 the City Council
passed Resolution No. N.S. 3280, which retained then -current
department heads in the civil service system but gave those
who might be appointed in the future the option of being --
employed under the City's civil service system or under a
Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU".l. with the Hermosa -Beach
Management and Middle Management Employees' Association. In
addition, several employees who had been hired on a temporary,
non -civil service basis were promoted to civil service
positions -after successfully completing a closed -examination.
Following the adoption of this resolution several new
department heads were appointed and chose to be governed by
the MOU.
In early 1975, the City's actions were considered
by the Office of the Attorney General, which reached the
same conclusion as the City Attorney, i.e., because the
civil service system had been adopted by initiative, positions
could only be removed from that system pursuant to a vote of
the electorate.
In the meantime, department head positions
continued to be filled by appointment and many if not all
of the appointees signed a waiver of any civil service
rights.
TRT27-3B
Members of the City Council
April 19, 1983
Page Three
In January 1979 the City Council received an
opinion from the City Attorney stating that if the Council
wished to return future department heads to the civil
service system, it should exempt the then -current depart-
ment heads who were not civil service employees, or allow
them to choose whether to return to the system.
In May 1981 the City received an opinion from
the Office of the Legislative Counsel, which concluded that
the City Council was not able to remove department heads
from the civil service system without receiving the 2/3 vote
of the electorate specified in Government Code Section
45007.
In February 1982 the City Council received an
opinion from the City Attorney, who noted that all new
employees, including the department heads, were being hired
according to the civil service rules, and that each existing
employee whose method of hiring was suspect was being tested
through the Los Angeles County Civil Service Board to ensure
that he or she met civil service standards.
DISCUSSION
This matter raises numerous procedural and sub-
stantive issues. Eachissue must be analyzed before deciding
on a course of- action.
1. Standina to bring lawsuit.
The first question is whether the taxpayers would
have the standing, or the legal ability, to bring a suit
against the City. In order to have standing, the courts
have required plaintiffs to have a .legally sufficient
interest in the outcome of the action. When reviewing the
standing of taxpayers to bring suit against a local public
agency, the courts are lenient, generally holding that
taxpayers have a legally sufficient interest in ensuring
that elected and appointed officials carry out local laws,
especially where, as here, the matter involves efficient
government service through the choice of well-qualified
public employees who are paid with tax -derived funds. Thus,
the taxpayers have standing to challenge the City's modifica-
tion of the civil service system and its method of appointing
and promoting civil service employees.
4
'i1 -48
Members of the City Council
April 19, 1983
Page Four
2. Statute of Limitations.
The second question is whether the taxpayers' suit
would be barred by the statute of limitations. Under the
statute of limitations, the courts will not hear a case if
too long a time has elapsed since the alleged wrong occurred.
Here, the applicable statute of'mi*a*inns wor ulg_be.thrdge
ears, because the lawsuit is based on a statute, i.e.,
__years,
overnment Code Section 45007. Furthermore, it is likely
that the taxpayers would challenge the City through a writ
of -mandate. If the City has adopted an ordinance incorpora-
ting the 90 -day limitations of Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1094.6, such an action would have to be filed within
ninety days after the challenged action. The original
removal of department heads from the civil service system,
and most of the challenged appointments and promotions
occurred more than three years ago. Therefore it super-
ficially appears that the action would largely be barred by
.the statute of ..limitations.
However, the courts'will disregard this time
bar if the violation is "continuing," that is, the wrongful
act renews itself periodically. We believe that the
courts would find such a continuing violation here, on the
theory that if an individual was not properly appointed to a
position in thg fist. pace, he or she improperly occupies
that o o n teach day of trent. -Despite the o tin'uing
vioration theory, however, the statute of limitations would
serve to limit any liability on the part of the City, its
officers, or employees based on analogous cases for recovery
of improperly withheld wages. In those cases, the courts
have held that any wages accrued beyond the statutory period
cannot be recovered.
3. Doctrine of Laches.
Laches is an equitable policy which bars an action
due to the plaintiff's tardiness.in initiating an action,
even if it is not barred by the statute of limitations. The
numerous letters from the citizens to the Council indicate
that they have been questioning the Council's action and
threatening to bring a lawsuit for several years. while an
argument does exist that they would be tarred by laches, it
is a disfavored defense when asserted by a governmental
agency, and we do not believe a court would preclude the
lawsuit on this ground.
Members of the City Council
April 19, 1983
Page Five
4. The validity of the Council's removal of
Department Heads from the System.
A. Relationship between the initiative power
and Government Code Section 45007.
In order to determine whether the Council had the
ability in 1970 to remove department heads from the civil
service system, the court would interpret the 1970 amendment
to Government Code Section 45007, and its relationship to
other state laws.
The most important of these other laws is Elections
Code Section 4013, which states in pertinent part: -
No ordinance proposed by initiative petition
and . adopted by the voters, shall be repealed or
amended except by.a vote of the people, unless provision
is otherwise made in the original ordinance."
In the case under consideration, it is undisputed that N.S.
211 was proposed by, initiative, that it included department
heads within the civil service system, that it was adopted
by the voters, that it did not include within its terms a
provision allowing an alternate method -of revision, and that
the removal of department heads from the civil service
system was not done pursuant to a vote of the people.
Prior to 1970, Government -Code Section 45007
provided:
--- "After inclusion in the system, any depart-
ments or appointive officers or employees shall not be
withdrawn, either by an outright repeal of the civil
service ordinance or otherwise, unless the withdrawal
.has been submitted to the city electors at a special
or regular municipal election and approved . by. 2/3 of
those voting on the proposition." _,)
Thus, prior to 1970, it made no difference whether
the City's civil service system was adopted through an
initiative or solely through Council action; either way, the
withdrawal of any position from the system required approval
by a vote of the people.
However, in 1970 Government Code Section 45007 was
amended by adding the following language:
Members of the City Council
April 19, 1963
Page Seven
There is, however, a second possible interpre-
tation of the 1970 amendment, and it is this one which forms
the basis of the taxpayers' allegations that the Council
acted in excess of its authority. This interpretation is
based on the following analysis:
The initiative power reserved to the people is
based on the California Constitution and is a power which is
of historic importance. Therefore, the courts will favor an
interpretation of a statute which protects this power over
one which diminishes or destroys it. Furthermore, the
courts will, whenever possible, interpret apparently con-
flicting statutory provisions in order to harmonize and give
effect to each. Based on the above principles, the court
should harmonize these two sections and protect the initiative
power by interpreting Government Code Section 45007 to mean
that (a) if a system had originally been adopted by the
Council, the Council could subsequently modify that system
to remove department heads without requiring a vote of the
people; (b) if the system were initially adopted by initiative,
any removal of employees, including department heads, would
still require a vote of the people.
This second interpretation is supported by the
opinions from the Office of the Attorney General, and
the Legislative Counsel of -California mentioned earlier.
Both of these opinions were based on the City's facts and
both concluded that the. applicable statutes must be inter-
preted in the manner urged by the taxpayers. We believe
that a court would undoubtedly give these two. opinions
substantial weight, although it would not be bound to reach
the same conclusion.
From the above discussion, it is apparent that
there are persuasive arguments to support either the City
Council's or the taxpayer's position. There is a substantial
possibility that a court would adopt the taxpayers' inter-
pretation.
B. The obligation to meet and confer.
If the Council had the power to remove the depart-
ment heads by a majority vote, a subsequent memorandum of
understanding and employee agreements waiving civil service
rights would be effective. If, however, the City Council
did not have the power to unilaterally remove the department
heads, their removal is non-negotiable and conflicting
sections of the memorandums of understanding and employee
waivers are ineffective.
TRT27-ES
Members of the City Council
April 19, 1983
Page Eight
C. The length of time in position.
As noted previously, the courts have held that the
mere passage of time will not make an invalid appointment
valid. For example, in Alfred v. County of Los Angeles, 101
Cal.App.3d 260 (1980), an employee sued for additional
compensation on the ground that he had been_working out of
_gr.:de in ani he_r _position for a substantial period of time
and wase ntit ed to b -e paid at the rate of the higher
position. The court rejected the employee's argument
because the applicable civil service rules required that an
ap ointment to the higher positi.cn a ma a only from an
eligibility list of aTe f ants wti'o had passed the necessary
examinations With scores ranking them among the three
highest on the list. The court found that the em—lo ee had
jever been certified for appointment from such a ist to the
higher position, and thus that he could not qualify for
appointment to. that position. Based on this and similar
judicial rulings, it is clear that, in the absence of other
factors, any unlawful appointments could not be transformed
into lawful ones just because the appointees have been good
employees for a substantial period of time.
D. The effect of closed examinations..
In recent years the City has taken remedial action
by appointing all new department heads under applicable --
civil service provisions and giving all incumbent employees
closed examinations under the civil service provisions.
The question of whether any defect in the initial appointment
process has been subsequently cured through this procedure
is very important in weighing the alternatives open to the
City and in assessing any possible liability. If the
closing examinations effectively brought the appointments
into compliance with the civil service requirements, not
only are those appointments now lawful but any liability on
the part of the City has.been substantially reduced, if not
eliminated. If, however, those examinations did not cure
any initial defect, the employees are still not lawfully
appointed, and any liability would continue to accrue.
Under the City's personnel rules, if a vacancy
exists in the civil service, and there is no certified
eligible list, the personnel officer shall conduct an
examination to fill that vacancy. The rules are silent as
to whether the examination should be "open," i.e., available
to all applicants, or ".closet," i.e., available only to
Members of the City Council
April 19, 1983
Page Nine
incumbent personnel. Under both the civil service ordinance
and the personnel rules, the personnel officer is given the
discretion to determine the manner and method in which
examinations shall be prepared and administered. The only
limitation is contained in Section 2-33 of the civil service
ordinance, which states:
"No special credit shall be allowed in meeting any
qualification, or in the giving of any test, or the
establishment of any employment or promotional lists
for employment rendered under temporary appointment."
This provision probably precludes the City from giving a
closed examination to a temporary, incumbent employee,
because allowing that employee to qualify for the exam as an
"incumbent" is a "special credit." Under this_interpretation,
we believe_that employees who were unlawfully appointed
cannot be validated by such an exam.
This does not mean, however, that this remedial
action would not be persuasive to a court on equitable
grounds. First, we have been unable to find any California
precedent on this issue which is either beneficial or
adverse to the City's position that this action cured any
defects. Thus, it appears to be a case of first impression
in which facts can often play a substantial part. We
believe that the fact that all appointees have now taken a
civil service examination may weigh very heavily in the
City's favor, as it insures that, a±1 appointees have -met at
least the minimum requirements for the position.
Second, we believe.that.this remedial action, in
addition ta other equitable arguments which may not by
themselves be persuasive, could be the basis of a judicial
decision in favor of the City. These other equitable
.factors include (a) the detrimental reliance upon the
validity of their appointments by approximately .one-half the
City's staff, many of whom undoubtedly left other employment
and made important financial and family decisions in the
belief their appointments were proper; (b) the substantial
detriment to the community which relies upon the expertise
and familiarity with the City's pending matters acquired by
the present staff to ensure City functions progress in a
smooth and timeiy.manner; (c) the lengthy delay on the part
of the concerned taxpayers before formally challenging in
the court the ever-increasing number of appointments, (d)
the City's potential liability in wrongful termination suits
which any one of the affected employees could file.
11414.1-10O
Members of the City Council
April 19, 1983
Page Ten
Similar equitable arguments were apparently very
influential to a judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court in
Santa Monica. In that case, the plaintiff challenged the
selection process used to appoint approximately 50 employees
of the Santa Monica Rent Control Board on the ground it did
not comply with civil service requirements. In that case,
Judge Rittenband stated that the employees should not be
penalized because the Agency had not hired them properly,
that current appointments were being processed in accordance
with civil service requirements that a mass firing, which
would ultimately result should the plaintiff prevail, would
cause "chaos" at the Agency, that the City could face 50
lawsuits for wrongful termination, and that the board member
who brought the action had known about the problems for
about three years before he brought the lawsuit. The
judge reached this conclusion despite an opinion written by
the Santa Monica City Attorney which stated the rent board
employees should be subject to civil service regulations.
The attorney for the plaintiff in that action has stated
that in light of the judge's ruling at this stage of the
lawsuit, the plaintiff will probably not pursue the case any
further.
The similarities between the facts of the Santa
Monica case and those of the City are striking, and we
believe the same arguments could influence another judge.
.E. _Personal liability of employees.
With respect to the liability of the individual
employees whose status is being challenged to repay the City
for wages.,_ paid to them, we have found no California case
which has required such a repayment. Those courts that have
reviewed invalid appointments or promotions have required
the city or public agency to comply with applicable rules
and regulations to fill the position, and.in the absence of
such compliance have denied the employees their requested
promotion or permanent status. However, we are aware of
no case in which the court has required the individual who
performed services for the public agency to repay all
compensation to the agency. Based on this, we do not
believe the court would impose such a penalty on the
individual employees.
Members of the City Council
April 19, 1963
Page Eleven
F. Personal liability of City Council members.
Regarding the possible imposition on the City
Council members of personal liability for past compensation
paid to any employee whose appointment or promotion was not
in compliance with the civil service rules, we have been
unable to find any case in California in which the court has
imposed such a draconian penalty on elected officials who
had a good faith basis for taking the disputed action. To
the contrary, Government Code Section 820.6 specifically
provides that if a public employee, including a public
elected official such as a member of the City Council, acts
in good faith, without malice, and under the apparent
authority of an enactment which is later held to be unconsti-
tutional, invalid, or inappicable, he is not liable except
to the extent he would have been liable had the enactment
been constitutional, valid, and applicable. This section,
in addition to the indemnificiation provisions of Government
Code Section 825, cause us to conclude that the court would
not impose personal liability.
Shoulda City Council member be named in a lawsuit
regarding this matter, he or she should immediately make a
written request to the City -to defend him or her against
that claim or action, pursuant to Government Code Section
825. That section also provides that if the employee
reasonably cooperates in good faith in the defense of the
claim or action, the City shall pay -any -judgment or settle-
ment as well as 'conduct the defense of the action. This
section does not protect the City Council members from
punitive damages.
However, we believe it is highly unlikely that the
courtwould impose such damages for good faith actions. We
also believe that wage payments would not be held to be
gifts of public funds. In any event,, any liability would be
limited by the statute of limitations, both as to any
liability of the employees and the Council for reimburse-
ment of salaries received and paid.
ALTERNATIVES
Based on the foregoing, we believe that the only
way the matter can be ultimately resolved is through a court
review of the issues. This could be initiated by the City
Members of the City Council
April 19, 1983
Page Twelve
in a "friendly" suit for declaratory relief in which the
City would effectively bring suit against itself as a method
of obtaining a. judicial opinion. This alternative would be
costly because the City would pay all legal expenses incurred
by both sides. The only advantage is that a final decision
would be reached. We would not recommend this alternative.
The second alternative is to closely review the
City's personnel files to determine which positions are
indeed involved, keeping in mind that the taxpayers are
expanding their contentions to include approximately 80
employees. After advising the affected employees of the
reason for its actions, the City could open these positions
for an open examination, in effect treating the incumbents
as if they had always been temporary and were now terminated.
This course of action would probably satisfy the concerned
taxpayers that the final appointees were selected in con-
formance with.civil service requirements. The disadvantages
associated with this alternative include the prospect
of reducing. efficiency should new appointees be selected and
trained, an adverse effect on employee morale, and the
likelihood that the terminated employees would challenge the
City's action in a lawsuit. As noted earlier, the judge
found the disadvantages of such a course of action so
persuasive that he declined to require such a drastic
remedy. We do not recommend this action.
The third alternative is to treat all previous
actions as valid and do nothing further until the threatened
taxpayers' suit actually materializes. This would retain
the City's low profile approach to this matter and for the
present avoid the costs associated with litigation. The
obvious disadvantage is the continuing nonresolution of the
matter.
We believe that the first step which must be taken
in order to fully evaluate these alternatives is to review
all personnel files to deteri!iine which employees might be
affected. This would allow an objective assessment of the
magnitude of the problem and balancing of the advantages and
disadvantages of each of the alternatives.
If you have any further questions or wish to
discuss this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Very truly -oprs,
TRT27:lb
a erso
1 -47,2c -P
April 19, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Hermosa Beach City Council of April 25, 1989
REPORT ON BILTMORE OPEN SPACE INITIATIVE
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council, as appropriate, either
1) introduce the initiative ordinance at this meeting and adopt
it within ten days, or 2) authorize submission of the ordinance
to the voters at the November, 1989 election, and direct the City
Clerk to take the necessary steps to accomplish.
Background:
At your meeting of March 28, 1989, the City Clerk provided you
the certificate indicating sufficient signatures to either adopt
the Biltmore Site open space initiative or place it on the ballot
for public vote. At that meeting, Council requested a report
from the City staff and attorney on the initiative, pursuant to
Government Code Section 4009.5.
Analysis:
The City Attorney's analysis is attached under separate memo.
Regarding fiscal impact of the initiative, staff referred to the
Biltmore Site Advisory Task Force information materials to deter-
mine that the current value of the Biltmore Site is approximated
at 8.375 to .37 million dollars. The value varies depending on
the zoning, the conditions of sale, and the likely difficulty of
the permit procedure.
The initiative would cause the site to be valued at an open space
value. Estimating current market price for open space land at $9
to $10 per foot, the open space value of the property would be
$.37 million. The initiative does not require any improvements
of the land, should the City continue to maintain ownership, so
there would be no required increased cost for maintenance.
Regarding limitations on actions, the initiative would limit uses
of the property to those allowed in the open space zone and
restrict changes of the zone by requiring a popular vote. It
does not restrict sale of the site or consolidation with other
land.
evin B. North aft
City Manager
KBN/ld
cc: Parker Herriott
Planning Department
Building Department
Public Works Department
10
A.
30 NORTH RAYMOND AVENUE
SUITE 708
PASADENA, CALIF. 9it03-3930
JAMES P LOUGH
ATTORNEY AT LAW
April 18, 1989
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
MEMORANDUM
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 25, 1989
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney
RE: Report on Biltmore Site Open Space Initiative
TEL: (8t8) N2-4.728
(818) N2-4770
FAx: (SIS) 449'6873
This report is in response to the Council's request
regarding the legal status of the initiative currently on file
with the City Clerk. The Council's request for this report was
made pursuant to Elections Code Section 4009.5(a)(3).
After a careful review of the initiative and relevant laws,
it is the opinion of the City Attorney that the initiative is of
sufficient validity to be placed on the November ballot. While
the initiative has some technical problems, none of these
problems is serious enough to cause the Council to prevent it
from being placed on the ballot. Also, the initiative cannot be
amended or modified prior to placement on the ballot.
There are two problems with the initiative ordinance that
raise some concern. The first matter relates to the General Plan
designation for the properties adjacent to the Biltmore Site.
Those properties are the adjacent private properties and the
city -owned parking lot which are covered by Ordinance No. 84-751
(Biltmore Specific Plan Area). These areas, which exclude the
actual Biltmore Site, are designated in the General Plan as Open
Space under Section 3 and General Commercial under Section 6.
This apparent conflict, if reviewed by a court, would be
resolved by interpreting the clause to apply the General Commer-
cial designation to the non -Biltmore Site properties. There are
several reasons for this interpretation. First, General Commer-
cial would make the property consistent with the zoning. Apply-
ing the Open Space designation would result in an inconsistency
with the General Plan and the Coastal Plan (Section 4).
Second, the law regarding conflicts in ordinances or
statutes is clear in that conflicts between various provisions
of the law must be resolved in a manner which validates the
law. This legal maxim is stated as follows:
35/SR0425A -1-
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 25, 1989
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney
RE: Report on Biltmore Site Open Space Initiative
An interpretation which gives effect is
preferred to one which makes void.
(Civil Code Section 3541)
Also, conflicting provisions must be harmonized in a manner
that gives effect [Referendum Committee v. City of Hermosa Beach
(1986) 184 Cal App 3d 152, 229 Cal Rptr 51]. The application of
Open Space designations to the parcel of land, in addition to
creating an inconsistency, could present a taking problem under
the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution [Penn
Central Transportation Co. v. New York City (1978) 438 U.S. 104,
124].
The second problem with the initiative is the voter approval
requirement for amendment or repeal under Section 11. It pre-
vents amendments or a repeal without a two-thirds vote of the
people. This section directly conflicts with state law on the
subject. Section 4013 of the California Elections Code states,
in part, as follows:
If a majority of the voters on a proposed
ordinance vote in its favor, the ordinance
shall become a valid and binding ordinance of
the city.... (Emphasis added.)
This conflict between the general law of the state and the
local initiative ordinance would be resolved in favor of the
state law [Committee of Seven Thousand v. Superior Court (1988)
45 Cal 3d 491]. In other words, a later initiative which
attempts to amend or repeal the subject initiative would be
effective if adopted by a majority of voters. Applying current
law, the two-thirds provision would not be valid.
Since this two-thirds provision is ineffective, it will have
no impact on the validity of the overall initiative. This clause
will not act to invalidate the entire initiative. The initia-
tive, under Section 7, contains a severability clause. It states
that if any part of the initiative is unenforceable, the rest of
the measure will remain in full force and effect. These types of
clauses will save the invalidation of an initiative if the main
purpose of the initiative can still be implemented after removal
of the offending part [City of Westminster v. County of Orange
(1988) 204 Cal App 3d 623]. Since the purpose of the initiative
is to reclassify the property and require voter approval for
amendment or repeal, the removal or failure to enforce this
35/SR0425A -2-
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 25, 1989
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney
RE: Report on Biltmore Site Open Space Initiative
two-thirds clause will not affect the overall validity of the
measure.
Based on the foregoing reasoning, it is the opinion of the
City Attorney that this initiative measure is valid for submis-
sion to the voters or immediate adoption by the City Council.
While city councils have successfully refused to place measures
on the ballot, the problems of this measure would not be suffi-
cient, in my legal opinion, to allow the Council to refuse to
act on the measure. In the case of de Bottari v. City of Norco
(1988) 171 Cal App 3d 1204, 217 Cal Rptr 790, the city council
refused to place a referendum on the ballot because it would
have created an inconsistency between the General Plan and zon-
ing. In its ruling, the court stated why it was compelled to
intervene at the pre-election stage:
...judicial deference to the electoral process
does not compel judicial apathy toward
patently invalid legislative acts...
(171 Cal App 3d at 1212-1213)
Here, the two main problems with the initiative do not
create a problem that is so clearly invalid it could never be
implemented. The courts are hesitant to intervene at the pre-
election stage without clear and compelling reasons (Referendum
Committee v. City of Hermosa Beach, supra).
While the Council is now aware of these problems, there is
no mechanism to make changes in the initiative ordinance.
Elections Code Section 4011 requires that the measure be sub-
mitted to the electorate "without alteration." This would pre-
vent deletion of the conflicting General Plan designation or the
two-thirds vote requirement.
The best method for having the electorate understand these
issues is to have them addressed in the voter's pamphlet. They
could be addressed in the arguments or the impartial analysis.
Whether they are addressed or not is left up to the sole discre-
tion of the persons who draft the arguments or analysis. Courts
often look at what information was in front of the voters to
determine what their intent was when they voted (Hass v. City
Council (1956) 139 Cal App 2d 73, 293 P2d 61].
In conclusion, it is the opinion of the City Attorney that
this initiative measure is of sufficient validity to require
35/SR0425A -3-
•
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 25, 1989
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney
RE: Report on Biltmore Site Open Space Initiative
placement on the November ballot. The placement on the ballot
would be without alteration by the City Council.
JPL/gp
Respectfulubmitte
AMES P. LOUGH, City tAttorney
ITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
cc: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager
35/SR0425A -4-
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: CITY TREASURER
RE: CIVIL SERVICE RULES AND GUIDELINES
DATE: APRIL 20, 1989
To establish employee job management guidelines, Civil
Service rules were established in the mid 1800's. In 1960
N.S. 211 introduced Civil Service job management to Hermosa
Beach municipal government.
From these various rules, guidelines were established for
employee advancement. I would like to explain two words
pertinent to the resolution of this issue. These words are
as follows:
RESPONSIBLE: Liable to be called upon to answer.
ACCOUNTABLE: Subject to giving account. Capable
of being held accountable for.
In management terms a manager (city manager) can delegate
responsibility for task accomplishment to another. However,
a manager cannot delegate accountability.
In 1967 the City Manager was made City Finance Director by
City Council resolution. The City Manager has delegated
certain City financial task completion responsibilities to
the Finance Administrator. The City Manager has been
accountable for City financial matters by City Council
resolution.
The City now wishes to make the Finance Administrator the
Finance Director using the rational that the Finance
Administrator has been acting as the Finance Director. As
was stated in the proceeding paragraphs, the City Manager is
and has legally been the Finance Director.
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
ti
The City Manager cannot delegate his accountability as
Finance Director to anyone. To remove the City Manager's
accountability as Finance Director, the City Council must
pass a new resolution that would vacate the Director's
position. Any individual desiring to become the new Finance
Director must comply with Civil Service regulations.
Section 19760 of N.S. 211 clearly states that the City
Treasurer must move to withhold the pay of any employee
promoted in violation of N.S. 211. I strongly recommend
that the City Council review Attorney Richard Watson's legal
opinions regarding this matter.
A policy must be adopted by the City regarding testing that
is fair and equitable to all employee groups in compliance
with N.S. 211, which is the legal standard established
requiring testing. Employee's have a legal right to
competatively compete for advancement. To allow variations
and deviations to the legally mandated guidelines of N.S.
211 and past advancement practices is prejudicial and
improper.
---"/Xi// 11)./t‘
GARY B1TSCH
CITY TREASURER
cc:
City Manager
Finance Director
Personnel Director
Department Heads
Union Steward
5'
11 jl
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
RESOLUTION NO. N. S. 2702
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, COMBINING THE POSITION OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE WITH THAT
OF THE CITY MANAGER.
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. N. S. 302 of the City of Hermosa Beach,
California, passed and adopted on the 7th day of March, 1967, creates the
office of Director of Finance for the City of Hermosa Beach; and
WHEREAS, Section 5 of said Ordinance provides that such position of
Director of Finance may be combined with any other office in the City of
Hermosa Beach; and
WHEREAS, this Council is of the opinion that the volume of work to be
assigned to a Director of Finance at the present time does not warrant filling
the position on a full time basis;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That upon the effective date of Ordinance No. N. S. 302
hereinabove referred to, the position of Director of Finance be combined with
that of the City Manager, and that all of the responsibilities and duties of such
office of Director of Finance are hereby assigned to said City Manager.
•
April 18, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach City Council April 25, 1989
SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT AND EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM
INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL'
PURPOSE: TO NOTE PROGRESS TOWARD RESOLUTION AND EXTEND INTERIM
ORDINANCE REGARDING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES AND USES
Recommendation
Adopt the attached ordinance extending the interim ordinance for
ten months and fifteen days.
Background
The City Council at their March 14, 1989 meeting, adopted an
interim ordinance to limit remodeling and expansion of
nonconforming structures and uses until a revised permanent
ordinance was adopted.
Status
The Planning Commission has adopted a resolution revising the
current ordinance. The proposed revision was submitted to the
City Council at their April llth meeting and was continued to the
April 25th meeting.
Once the City Council has adopted the revised ordinance or a
modified version thereof and it becomes effective, the interim
ordinance can be repealed. Unless the City Council continues
this matter again, the revised ordinance should become effective
by mid-June.
CONCUR:
'Kevin` B. Norraft
City Manager
a/ccsrmora
1
The proposed Ordinance will not be
avbailable until Monday, April 24
James P. Lough
Attorney at Law-
30 North Raymond Avenue TTerephone
Suite 708
18181792-4728
Pasadena. Calif. 91103-3930 (818) 792-4776
April 25, 1989
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
MEMORANDUM
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 25,-1989
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney
RE: RECLASSIFICATION ISSUE UNDER N.S. 211
This memo is in response to the Council's request for
opinion as to the applicability of N.S. 211 to reclassifications.
Under N.S. 211, provision is made.. for reclassification of
positions to be recommended by the City Manager and adopted by
the City Council (Section 2-32[a]).
The subsection listed above allows for "revision...of
position classification(s) covering all positions in the
competitive service...". Here, the revision would be a change in
the classification based on job duties which are currently being
performed by the employee in question. Essentially, the position
in question consists of a bundle of duties which are performed by
an individual employee. Reclassification of the job title, when
done under the rules and regulations established by the City
Council, are a normal and necessary part of the Civil Service
process as established under N.S. 211. This procedure is the
same as the County Civil Service procedure for reclassifications.
The County rules were used as a pattern when N.S. 211 was set up
by the City by a vote of the people. Therefore, such a
reclassification isallowed pursuant to the Hermosa Beach Civil
Service ordinances.
An action taken by the Council, based on these rules, would
not subject the Councilmembers to individual liability. The
reason for this is that the Council would be acting in good faith
in adopting the policy since it follows City procedures. Under
Government Code Section 820.6, no personal liability could ever
be found against a city councilmember unless that liability would
also be found if the action was legal in all respects. There are
no known cases in which a city councilmember has been subjected
to such personal liability in a situation such as that presented
to the Council here.
Another issue raised in the memo by the City Treasurer deals
with authority to disburse monies based on the reclassification.
There is no known Hermosa Beach rule which would allow the City
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
9
4
to withhold payments based on a supposed dispute over the
legality of the reclassification. While under Government Code
Section 19760, the State Treasurer may withhold such monies from
an illegal appointment made by the State, that rule only applies
to the State Civil Service System. Therefore, any action to
withhold payment based on a perceived illegality would, in my
opinion,pe outside the course and scope of the duties of the
issuing officer.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at
the Council meeting.
JPL/ld
Yours very truly,
S P. LOUG-, Ci y Att ney
Y OF HERMOSA BEACH
James P. Lough
Attorney at Law
30 North Raymond Avenue Telephone
Suite 708 (818) 7924128
Pasadena, Calif. 91103-3930 - 18181 792-4776
April 25, 1989
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
MEMOR.ANDUM
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 25, 1989
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney
RE: RECLASSIFICATION ISSUE UNDER N.S. 211
This memo is in response to the Council's request for
opinion as to the applicability of N.S. 211 to reclassifications.
Under N.S. 211, provision is made for reclassification of
positions to be recommended by the City Manager and adopted by
the City Council (Section 2-32[a]).
The subsection listed above allows for "revision...of
position classification(s) covering all positions in the
competitive service...". Here, the revision would be a change in
the classification based on job duties which are currently being -
performed by the employee in question. Essentially, the position
in question consists of a bundle of duties which are performed by
an individual employee. Reclassification of the job title, when
done under the rules and regulations established by the City
Council-, are a normal and necessary part of the Civil Service
process as established under N.S. 211. This procedure is the
same as the County Civil Service procedure for reclassifications.
The County rules were used as a pattern when N.S. 211 was set up
by the City by a vote of the people. Therefore, such a
reclassification is allowed pursuant to the Hermosa Beach Civil
Service ordinances.
An action taken by the Council, based on these rules, would
not subject the Councilmembers to individual liability. The
reason for this is that the Council would be acting in good faith
in adopting the policy since it follows City procedures. Under
Government Code Section 820.6, no personal liability could ever
be found against a city councilmember unless that liability would
also be found if the action was legal in all respects. There are
no known cases in which a city councilmember has been subjected
to such personal liability in a situation such as that presented
to the Council here.
Another issue raised in the memo by the City Treasurer deals
with authority to disburse monies based on the reclassification.
There is no known Hermosa Beach rule which would allow the City
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
9
ti
to withhold payments based on a supposed dispute over the
legality of the reclassification. While under Government Code
Section 19760, the State Treasurer may withhold such monies from
an illegal appointment made by the State, that rule only applies
to the State Civil Service System. Therefore, any action to
withhold payment based on a perceived illegality would, in my
opinion, be outside the course and scope of the duties of the
issuing officer.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at
the Council meeting.
JPL/ld
Yours very truly,
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the Hermosa Beach City Council
April 19, 1989
City Council Meeting
of April 25, 1989
REVIEW OF CITY RECLASSIFICATION POLICY AND
RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OF RECLASSIFICATION
OF FINANCE ADMINISTRATOR TO FINANCE DIRECTOR
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council: 1) reaffirm the City's
procedure for reclassification of positions within the competi-
tive service approved at your meeting of October 11, 1988, and 2)
approve the class specification for the position of Finance Di-
rector, establish the salary range for the position at n range
for the management employees salary schedule (3674 to 4253) and
approve the reclassification of the Finance Administrator to
Finance Director.
Background:
The recommendation regarding the reclassification of the Finance
Administrator was submitted to the Council at your April 11, 1989
meeting. The recommendation failed passage on a 3-2 vote, and
then was continued by a unanimous vote. At that same meeting,
the City Council also requested a review of the procedure for
reclassification of positions within the competitive service as
unanimously approved by the City Council in October, 1988.
Analysis:
Attached is the subject agenda item from the October 11, 1988
meeting. Also attached is a memo from the City Attorney, dated
December 22, 1987, which confirms the authority of the City Coun-
cil to adopt this procedure as recommended by the City Manager
pursuant to Section 2-32 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code
(N.S. 211). The final attachment is a copy of Section 2-33 of
the Municipal Code related to appointments (also from N.S. 211).
Personnel procedures can become complicated, and the distinction
between a promotion and a reclassification can be confusing. The
key distinction is whether or not a vacant, authorized position
exists. A position is a set of work duties and responsibilities
assigned to one employee within an organization. A classifica-
tion is a title, job description, and salary range that is assig-
ned to each position within the City based on studies that deter-
mine the appropriate classification for each position. A posi-
tion is vacant if it is authorized but no incumbent employee is
currently occupying.
Section 2-33 states under the paragraph entitled Competitive Ex-
aminations "Appointments to vacant positions in the competitive
service shall be made in accordance with personnel rules and reg-
ulations. Appointments and promotions shall be based on merit
1
and fitness to be ascertained as far as practicable by competi-
tive examinations." (Emphasis added.)
When a vacancy exists, the City
cess and a list is established.
Civil Service Board, certifying
an appointment can be made.
requires a competitive exam pro -
The list then is approved by the
the qualified applicants, before
There is no appointment in a reclassification situation, since
reclasses are necessitated when the duties of a position current-
ly held by an employee have been found by independent study to be
not predominantly within the current classification's list of
duties. The principles of fair and equitable treatment of em-
ployees found in all civil service systems then require that the
employee be appropriately classified and compensated, provided
the incumbent meets the requirements for the proposed
classification.
Regarding the recommendation for reclassification of the Finance
Administrator, this is the sixth position recommended for reclas-
sification under the currently approved policy. The others were:
Parking Enforcement Officer to Meter Maintenance, Clerk Typist to
Administrative Aide, Clerk Typist to Account Clerk (2 positions),
and Clerk Typist to Administrative Aide. All were recommended by
the Personnel Director, City Manager and approved unanimously by
the City Council. Since reclassifications result from equity and
fairness issues, the alternative to reclassifying a position is
to return the position to its duties of its current class. In
most cases, and especially true with the subject reclassifica-
tion, this would have a very negative impact on the City's
operations.
evin B. Northc aft
City Manager
KBN/ld
cc: Personnel
September 27, 1988
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Hermosa Beach City Council of October 11, 1988
APPROVAL OF PROCEDURE ON RECLASSIFICATIONS
AND RECLASSIFICATIONS OF CERTAIN POSITIONS
Recommendation:
That the City Council confirm the procedure for reclassifications
described below and authorize the reclassifications of the fol-
lowing positions:
1. Present Class: Parking Enforcement Officer
Reclassification: Parking Meter Technician
Location: General Services Department
Incumbent: Robert Thomas
2. Present Class: Clerk Typist
Reclassification: Account Clerk
Location: Finance Department
Incumbents: Kathy Chiles, Sherria Lawrence
3. Present Class: Clerk Typist (Senior)
Reclassification: Administrative Aide
Location: Planning
Incumbent: Yu-Ying Ting
Background:
Several proposed position reclassifications in the General Ser-
vices, Finance, and Planning Department were included in this
year's annual budget and/or discussed with the employee associa-
tions during meet and confer discussions. At the same time,
questions have been raised by citizen activist Wilma Burt and
others regarding how City employees can move to higher positions
without competitive exams. The intent of this recommendation is
to set an orderly, written procedure for reclassifications and
process those reclassifications proposed.
Analysis:
Civil Service and merit systems provide for promotional, competi-
tive exams when a position is vacant, and other employees wish to
be promoted from lower paid positions to the vacant one. This
procedure would be considered as an appointment to a vacant posi-
tion and require the Civil Service Board to certify the
eligibility list. Reclassifications of a position, which may
result in higher pay, do not occur as a result of a vacancy.
Rather, reclasses occur when the duties of a position have been
found by independent study to be predominantly not within the
current classification's list of duties.
Since pay plans are based on a concept of fairness and equity,
employees performing duties other than those listed for their
classes cause a basic inequity in the City's pay system. To
correct this inequity, Civil Service and merit systems provide
for reclasses and accompanying pay level changes where
appropriate.
An obvious concern is to avoid misuse of reclassifications to
subvert competitive exam processes. In order to establish a
written procedure to prevent misuse, we have reviewed the Los
Angeles County's Civil Service procedures for reclassifications.
Based on their procedures and our understanding of how rules can
be best applied within our City, the following criteria for
reclassifications are proposed:
(1) Reclassification studies shall be initiated by the Personnel
Department upon recommendation of the Department Head in-
dicating that the duties required of a current position have
become predominantly other than those described in the clas-
sification specification sheet.
(2) The Personnel Department shall recommend a reclassification
upon conducting a study of the subject position's duties and
establishing findings that meet all of the following
criteria:
(a) that a predominant amount of duties required of the
position are other than as described for the current
classification;
(b) that the incumbent in the position has performed these
"out of classification" duties for at least six months;
(c) that the incumbent(s) in the position(s) is or are the
only person(s) performing those specific duties; and
(d) that the incumbent has adequately demonstrated that he/
she meets the requirements for the proposed
classification.
(3) Reclassifications, along with new class specification sheets
and/or amendments to the salary resolution or budget, if
appropriate, shall be approved by the City Council. Upon
approval, the reclassification will take effect the first
day of the payroll period in which the Council action was
approved.
(4) Reclassification shall not be used for the purpose of avoid-
ing procedures regarding promotions and demotions.
Implementation of the above -noted reclassifications procedure is
similar to past practice, except reclassifications have been ap-
proved by the Civil Service Board. Since changes to the clas-
sification plan and salary resolution must be approved by the
City Council per N.S. 211 (1960 initiative Civil Service Or-
dinance), it seems simpler to provide for all reclassifications
to go to the City Council. As this process results in a reclas-
sification and not an appointment, there is no need to have the
Civil Service Board to certify this action.
The recommended procedure is consistent with L. A. County Civil
Service procedures as well as N.S. 211. The latter provides for
competitive exams "...as far as practicable...". Clearly, a
reclassification is separate from a promotional opportunity oc-
curring because of a vacant position. These facts significantly
affect the "practicality" of competitive exam processes.
I' j/
ev n B. Nor craft
City Manager
KBN/ld
cc: Wilma Burt
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER L 30R
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
-•.. £CW r f•a•• Or .O$ AN:al-CS C*. •C••• ♦ •c: a
.AMES C 04•1,41KLA
it +:v . S'ea' .E .:0 :E=
July 22, 1986
9+• • Q
To: Department and District Heads
From: James C. Hankie
Chief Administrative Officer
Subject: HUMAN RESOURCES REPORT NO. 57: RECLASS
EXAMINATION POLICY/PROCEDURE CHANGE
In keeping with our desire to eliminate unnecessary processes
and to streamline human resource activity, a new policy is being
implemented relating to Reclass Examinations.
Formerly, a classification study which resulted in an
would require the conduct of a reclass examination in
qualify an incumbent for appointment to the position.
process was followed even when it was clear that only
incumbent was eligible for the position.
The attached policy/procedure change will permit the
Classification Division's reporting out document to be certified
by Employee Selection so the incumbent may be appointed. During
the classification study, appropriate steps will be taken to
insure that no other persons would be entitled to compete for the
position and that the incumbent meets the requirements of the
reclassified position.
upgrade
order to
This
the -
Questions concerning the new policy may be directed to
Richard Zorn, Classification Division, at 974-2439 or
Ernie Oestreich, Employee Selection at 974-2701.
JCH :DRD
LO: ug
A t to chme n t
10: 57 DATE: July 1, 1986
POLICY/PROCEDURE CHANGE: RECLASS EXAMINATIONS
This report supersedes all previous issues relating to Reclass
Examinations.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this policy/procedure change is to eliminate the
unwieldly and unnecessary aspects of the current process for
Reclass Examinations. Prior to this change, staff hours would
be wasted by going through the required activity to bulletin and
conduct an examination when it was clear that no competition
existed. Effective the date of this policy, the classification
study will take appropriate steps to ascertain whether there is
only one potential eligible for each reclassified position. The
letter reporting the results of a classification study will show
the incumbent's name and a statement to permit the CAO Office of
Human Resources Certification Unit to certify the letter as the
eligible list for the position.
POLICY
It shall be the policy of the County of Los Angeles, effective
the date of this report, to fill positions created as the result
of a reclassification by using one of three roe thods :
1. The reporting out letter may be certified as the
eligible list when the classification study findings
indicate that there is only one eligible for each
position.
2. The Department may request that a Rimless Examination
be bulletined with a defined specialty for the
position.
3. Any other selection process in keeping with County
rules and regulations may be used.
PROCEDURES
1. Following approval of the reclassification study findings by
the Board of Supervisors, and in accordance with Civil
Service Rules 7.04 and 7.06, the Certification Unit of the
Employee Selection Division will, on request from the line
department, initiate one of the three policy options.
Policy/Procedure Change: Reclass Examinations
July 1, 1986
Page 2
2. For Option 1, when the classification study findings meet
the criteria below, the Human Resources Certification Unit
may, on .request of the affected department, certify the
reporting out letter initiated by the Human Resources
Classification Division as constituting the certified
Reclass Examination list.
a. The study findings identify one and only one individual
per reclassified position as eligible to be appointed in
accordance with Human Resources policy. The reporting
out letter will show such incumbents name.
b. The ordinance change has been approved by the Board of
Supervisors and is in effect.
c. The incumbent meets the minimum requirements for the
higher level position as determined by the
classification analyst.
d. The reporting out letter contains the following
statement:
"This letter may be used as the eligible list for the
following position(s): ."
3. In selecting Option 1, information from the reporting out
letter will be posted on the official county recruitment
bulletin board in compliance with Civil Service Rule 7.03 a.
4. At the end of the required posting time, and after the
ordinance change has been approved by the Board of
Supervisors, the Department may process an Incoming Report
for the person(s) named in the reporting out letter. A copy
of the letter should be attached.
5. When selecting Option 2, the current procedures which exist
for conducting Reclass Examinations will be followed. The
Certification Unit will prepare the Promotional
Opportunities bulletin, Examinations As The Result of A
Reclassification" after consultation with the concerned
department. The special card form, "Application for
Promotional Examination for Reclassified Position," will be
used.
Policy/Procedure Change: Reclass Examinations
July 1, 1986
Page 3
6. Option 3
the Civi
7. For adds
Examinat
Division
References:
may be any other selection process permissible under
1 Service Rules and other County Code Regulations.
tional Information or questions regarding Reclass
ions, contact the CAO-OHR Employee Selection
, or the CAO-OHR Classification Division.
a. Los Angeles
5.88 Civi
Rule 7
Rule 7
Rule 8
County Code Title 5 Personnel Chapter
1 Service Rules
.04 Competitive Examinations
.06 Types of Examinations
.01 Non -Competitive Examinations
b. Los Angeles County Personnel Management Handbook
Section 100 Recruitment and Placement
Section 150.01 d. Reclass Examinations
Section 200 Classification
Section 220 Study Procedures
Section 285 The Evaluation
c. CAO/Human Resources Employee Selection Division
Policy & Procedure Manual
Section 900
Reclass Examinations - Certification's
Responsibilities
10/23/81 Classification Staff Memo on
Reclass Reporting Out Letters
Classification Employee Selection
besponsib le Division Responsible Division
974-2439 974-2701
CHIEF' ADN11.•41b 1 HA1 1V t,ur k LLk;H
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES
222 40RTM GRANO AVENu( .06 ANGELES CA►.FORwA 990 2
IIA 974 apt
JAMES C. MANKLA
CHIEF AOMINISTRATIvE OFFICER
Reporting out letter as Reclass Exam
Personnel Officer
YEYSEAS SOARO
PETER 0 SCMAIARUM
CHAIRMAN
01E4NET04 MAMN
EDMVNO 0 EDELMAN
OEANE OANA
MICMAEI.0 ANTONOVICM
We have conducted a classification study of the position(s)
listed below; our finding(s) is(are) as follows:
Classification Location and
Present Class Finding Assignment Incumbent
We have determined that the incumbent is the only person
eligible for the reclassified position. Therefore, this letter
may be used as the eligible list for the position indicated.
(add withhold restriction if applicable)
This finding will be effective upon approval of the Board of
Supervisors; appointment to the position may not be made until
the ordinance change is operative.
BC:RBZ
CV:sk
Attachments
138L -CHANGES
Law Offices of James P. Lough
oMI1 P. LOUGH
30 NORTH RAYMOND AVENUE
SUITE 708
PASADENA, CALWORNU 91103
December 22, 1987 (213) 381-6131
(818) 792-4728
C ONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM (818) 792-4776
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CDflFh OEflThL
TO: Members of the Civil Service Commission
FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney
RE: Questions Concerning Responsibility of Civil Service
Commission
This memo is an attempt to address the issues raised by the
Civil Service Commission regarding miscellaneous matters dealing
with its responsibilities under the City's Civil Service ordi-
nance. Essentially, the duties of the Civil Service Commission
Are framed by NS211 as adopted by the citizens of Hermosa Beach.
1. Why doesn't the Civil Service Commission play a role in
the approval of class specifications?
Under Section 2-32 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, the
types of personnel rules and regulations that are to be prepared
by the City Manager are listed. These rules and regulations
require adoption by the City Council instead of the Civil Serv-
ice Commission. Under subsection (a), class specifications are
dealt with as follows:
(a) Preparation, installation, revision and
maintenance of a position classification plan
covering all positions in the competitive
service including employment standards and
qualifications for each class.
This section specifically delegates to the City Manager,
with approval of the City Council, all issues dealing with class
specification. The probable reason for this delegation to the
City Manager with approval of the City Council is because of the
consultation requirements under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act
(Government Code Section 3500 et seq.). The City must consult
with employee groups before making such changes. Possibly, the
drafters of the Civil Service ordinance thought that this could
be accomplished with the two-step process rather than adding the
Civil Service as a third step.
19/SR1222 -1-
Sec. 2-33. Appointments.
Competitive examinations. Appointments to vacant posi-
tionstions in the competitive service shall be made in ac-
cordance with personnel rules and regulations. Appoint-
ments and promotions shall be based on merit and fitness
to be ascertained so far as practicable by competitive exam-
inations. Examinations shall be used and conducted to aid
in the selection of qualified employees and shall consist
of such recognized selection techniques as achievement and
aptitude tests, and other written tests, personal interview,
performance tests, evaluation of daily work performance,
work sampler, or any combinations of these or other recog-
nized selection techniques which will test fairly the qualifica-
tions of the candidates. Subject to inspection and review of
the civil service board, the personnel officer shall prepare, con-
duct and grade examinations excepting wherein such functions
are performed as set forth in section 2-47. The personnel offi-
cer may also provide for suitable physical, medical and psycho-
logical tests to be given as a qualification for eligibility to
appointment.
Qualifying tests. The personnel officer may require, in
addition to competitive tests, a qualifying test or tests which
will verify that the applicant can meet the minimum qualify-
ing standards set forth for the position.
Appointing officer. Appointments shall be made by the
officer in whom the power to make appointments is vested by
law from an eligibility list established by the civil service
board.
24
2-34 ADMINISTRATION j 2-34
Temporary a/,pniatments in absence of appointment lists.
In the absence of appropriate employment lists, a tempo-
rary appointment may be made by the appointing power of a
person meeting the minimum training and experience qualifi-
cations for the position. An employment list shall be estab-
lished within six months for any permanent position filled by
temporary appointment. The city manager, with the approval
of four-fifths of the city council, may extend the period for
any temporary appointment to any position for not more than
thirty days by any one action and the city council shall direct
the city clerk to record such action in the minutes of the meet-
ing of the city council.
No special credit shall be allowed in meeting any qualifica-
tion, or in the giving of any test, or the establishment of any
employment or promotional lists for service rendered under
temporary appointment.
Filling vacancies during suspension, demotion or dismissal
of employees. During the period of suspension of an em-
ployee or pending final action on proceedings to review sus-
pension, demotion or dismissal of an employee, such vacancy
may be filled by the appointng power on a temporary basis
subject to the provisions of this article and the personnel rules
and regulations.
Vacancies in specialized or technical fields. When a va-
cancy exists in a specialized or technical field and the civil
service board certifies to thecity council that the supply
of qualified personnel in such field is insufficient to provide
an appropriate employment list, the city council may au-
thorize the appointing power to permanently appoint a quali-
fied person to such vacancy. (Ord. No. 211 N. S., § 9.)
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1,
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
25
27
28
ORDINANCE NO. 89 -
AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
EXTENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-977, A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF
BUILDING PERMITS FOR NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES AND/OR USES FOR
TEN MONTHS AND FIFTEEN DAYS
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 25,
1989;
WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance allows for substantial
additions to existing nonconforming uses and structures;
WHEREAS, substantial alterations to nonconforming uses and
structures will maintain the nonconformity for many years to come
which compounds any current parking, density, safety, and other
environmental problems;
WHEREAS, many nonconforming _structures are undergoing
substantial alterations while circumventing existing planning
regulations;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it desires a study of
nonconforming structures and uses and a recommendation from the
Planning Commission to remedy this situation;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that further reconstruction
of nonconforming uses and structures, during the period of the
study, would defeat the purpose of the study;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. No building permits shall be issued for projects
which are nonconforming to the zoning ordinance.
1
1
4.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1.1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(a) Exceptions. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects
that have a completed building permit package on file with the
City prior to March 14, 1989. Said package must include a
completed building permit application form, completed conceptual
plan (plot plan, floor plan, elevation plans, and similar plans,
and a lot survey). Projects that have submitted a completed
building permit package must pursue their application in a
diligent manner and must be issued a building permit within six
months of the effective date of this ordinance.
(b) This ordinance shall not apply to additions to nonconforming
structures where the proposed addition meets all of the following
criteria:
1. The value of the expansion is equal, or less than 50% of
the cost of the existing structure(s) based upon ICBG
estimate of cost per square foot of structure as calculated
by the Building Department; and
2. 10% or less of the existing dwelling will be demolished
or removed as calculated by the Building Department.
3. A minimum of two parking spaces per unit are provided.
Section 2. No building permits shall be issued for any
additions or structural alterations of nonconforming uses.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon
adoption by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council of
Hermosa Beach.
Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective for a period of
ten months (10) and fifteen days (15) from today's date unless
extended pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code
Section 65858.
2
3
s
5
6
7
8
9
1C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Section 5. The City Council shall draft a report for
presentation to the public prior to any future extension of this
ordinance. Such report shall state what steps are being taken to
correct the problems referenced in this ordinance and what steps
are planned to be taken in the future to remedy the situation.
Section 6. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days
after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this
ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper
of general circulation published and circulated in the City of
Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law.
Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of
original ordinances of said city, shall nuke minutes of the
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings if
the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1989.
PRESIDENT of the CITY COUNCIL and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
t/ordnon
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
3
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO. 89 -
AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
EXTENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-977, A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF
BUILDING.PERMITS.FOR NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES AND/OR USES FOR
TEN MONTHS AND FIFTEEN DAYS
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 25,
1989;
WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance allows for substantial
additions to existing nonconforming uses and structures;
WHEREAS, substantial alterations to nonconforming uses and
structures will maintain the nonconformity for many years to come
which compounds any current parking, density, safety, and other
environmental problems;
WHEREAS, many nonconforming structures are undergoing
substantial .alterations while _circumventing existing planning
regulations;
WHEREAS, the. City Council finds that it desires a study of
nonconforming structures and uses and a recommendation from the
Planning Commission to remedy this situation;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that further reconstruction
of nonconforming uses and structures, during the period of the
study, would defeat the purpose of the study;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. No building permits shall be issued for projects
which are nonconforming to the zoning ordinance.
1
1
c.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(a) Exceptions. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects
that have a completed building permit package on file with the
City prior to March 14, 1989. Said package must include a
completed building permit application form, completed conceptual
plan (plot plan, floor plan, elevation plans, and similar plans,
and a lot survey). Projects that have submitted a completed
building permit package must pursue their application in a
diligent manner and must be issued a building permit within six
months of the effective date of this ordinance.
(b) This ordinance shall not apply to additions to nonconforming
structures where the proposed addition meets all of the following
criteria:
1. The value of the expansion is equal, or less than 50% of
the cost of the existing structure(s) based upon ICBO
estimate of cost per square foot of structure as calculated
by the Building Department; and
2. 10% or less of the existing dwelling will be demolished
or removed as calculated by the Building Department.
3. A minimum of two parking spaces per unit are provided.
Section 2. No building permits shall be issued for any
additions or structural alterations of nonconforming uses.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon
adoption by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council of
Hermosa Beach.
Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective for a period of
ten months (10) and fifteen days (15) from today's date unless
extended pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code
Section 65858.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
Section 5. The City Council shall draft a report for
presentation to the public prior to any future extension of this
ordinance. Such report shall state what steps are being taken to
correct the problems referenced in this ordinance and what steps
are planned to be taken in the future to remedy the situation.
Section 6. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days
after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this
ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper
of general circulation published and circulated in the City of
Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law.
Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of
original ordinances of said city, shall make minutes of the
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings if
the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this
day of , 1989.
PRESIDENT o the CITY COUNCIL an. MAYOR o the City o Hermosa
Beach, California
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
t/ordnon
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
3
REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED HERMOSA BEACH NON—CONFORMING ORDINANCE
Pc C1:1:cl.
APRIL 23, 1965 APR 2`1 1989
THE ATTACHED ORDINANCE AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION CONSTITUTES A
MAJOR CHANGE IN THE METEIOD BY WHICH HERMOSA BEACH TREATS THE
RENOVATION / ENLARGEMENT OF EXISTING STRUCTURES IN THE CITY.
THE ORDINANCE DEFINES TWO TYPES OF NON—CONFORMITIES:
1. BUILDING NON—CONFORMITIES; I.E. SUBSTANDARD SETBACKS, LESS
THAN CURRENTLY REQUIRED PARKING, LESS THAN CURRENTLY REQUIRED
OPEN SPACE AREA, MORE THAN THE 65% LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED, OVER
CURRENT HEIGHT LIMIT, ETC.
2. USE NON—CONFORMITIES;_RELATED TO. PROPERTIES WHICH DO NOT FIT
THEIR ZONING ALLOWED USE,' SUCH AS A DUPLEX IN AN R-1 (SINGLE
FAMILY) ZONE, A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE IN A COMMERCIAL ZONE, OR
VICE VERSA OR EVEN 3 UNITS IN AN R-3 ZONE IF THE LOT IS NOT LARGE
ENOUGH TO BUILD 3 UNITS UNDER CURRENT REQUIREMENTS.
THE NEW ORDINANCE WOULD ALLOW A MAXIMUM OF 50% -ADDITION (BASED ON
EVALUATION) TO THOSE PROPERTIES FALLING. INTO $1 BUILDING
NON—CONFORMITIES AND NO ADDITION TO THOSE PROPERTIES FALLING
UNDER 02 USE NON—CONFORMITIES. MINOR REPAIRS ONLY WOULD BE
ALLOWED FOR USE VIOLATING BUILDINGS.
ON THE SURFACE THIS MAY SEEM LIKE A REASONABLE STANCE FOR THE
CITY TO TAKE IF IT DID NOT COME BACK TO BACK WITH THE LAST THREE
YEARS OF DOWN ZONES, PARKING REQUIREMENT CHANGES, HEIGHT LIMIT
CHANGES, OPEN SPACE CHANGES, CHANGES IN THE NUMBERS OF UNITS
ALLOWED IN ALL THE MULTI—FAMILY ZONES IN THE CITY (WITH MORE TO
COME BASED ON RECENT COUNCIL ACTIONS),CONDOMINIUM ORDINANCE
CHANGES AND DRASTIC MODIFICATIONS TO GROUND LEVEL SETBACKS.
BASED ON THESE RECENT CHANGES I WOULD ESTIMATE THAT 01 BUILDING
NON—CONFORMITIES WOULD EFFECT APPROXIMATELY 99% OF THE EXISTING
STRUCTURES IN HERMOSA, LEAVING OUT ONLY THOSE BUILDINGS WHICH
WERE CONSTRUCTED WITH IN THE LAST YEAR OR SO UNDER THE NEW
CONSTRAINTS. THE RESULT IS THAT ANY ONE INTERESTED IN DOING A
MAJOR REMODEL OR ADDITION TO AN EXISTING STRUCTURE (OVER 50% OF
THE EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE ADDED) WOULD BE FORCED TO TEAR
DOWN AND BUILD A NEW STRUCTURE.
SUPPLEMENTAL s
INFORMATION
NON-CONFOhMINU CONT:
MUCH MORE DfA:�TIC IS THE EFFECT OF NO ALLOWED ADDITION FOR #2 USE
NON -CONFORMITIES. I WOULD MAKE A ROUGH GUESS THAT THIS EFFECTS
APPROXIMATELY 40% OF THE BUILDINGS IN TOWN, INCLUDING VIRTUALLY
ALL THE MULTI -FAMILY STRUCTURES BECAUSE OF RECENT UNIT ALLOWANCE
DOWNGRADE:; AND MANY DUPLEX (HOME AND INCOME) STRUCTURES WHICH
WERE RECENTLY DOWNZONED PUTTING THEM OUT OF USE CONFORMITY. I .
ASSUME THAT MANY OR MOST OF THESE DUPLEX'S WILL REMAIN FOR AS
LONG AS 60 YEARS WITHOUT UPGRADING AS A RESULT OF THIS PROPOSED
ACTION. IF THE FAMILY GROWS OUT OF THEM THEY WILL BECOME MORE
RENTAL STOCK TO ADD TO OUR ALREADY ASTRONOMICAL PERCENTAGE OF
ABSENTEE OWNER HOUSING.
PLEASE ATTEND THE UPCOMING COUNCIL MEETING ON TUESDAY APRIL 25th
IF YOU AGREE WITH ME THAT THE CITY NEEDS TO MOVE VERY SLOWLY AND
CAREFULLY WITH THIS ORDINANCE. HERMOSA HAS A LONG HISTORY OF
REACTION WITH OUT ENOUGH STUDY AND WITHOUT A LONG RANGE SET OF
GOALS WHICH ARE ANALYZED WHEN A MAJOR MODIFICATION, SUCH AS THIS
ONE, IS CONTEMPLATED. LETS GUARANTEE THAT THE LONG TERM EFFECT OF
THIS ORDINANCE IS ON TARGET WITH THE GOALS.
GERALD W. COMPTON AIA
GWC INC.
April 17, 1989
HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of
HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL April 25, 1989
PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
MARCH 1989
Staff reports were prepared for the following:
1. 6 1st Quarter General Plan Amendments
2. 3 Zone Changes
3 5 C.U.P.'s for Condominiums
4. 1 C•.U.P. for a Parking Plan
5. 7 Lot Merger Appeals
6. 1 Text Amendment regarding height of hedges and fences
7. 1 Text Amendment regarding nonconforming structures
8. 1 Policy statement confirmation and moratorium regarding
remodeling and expansion of non -conforming structures
9. 1 Memo from Planning Commission to City Council regarding
relocation assistance for senior citizens and fixed
income people
10. 1 Resolution of Intent to study downtown parking
The following activities were undertaken for transit projects:
1. Routine tasks.
Meetings and seminars attended by the Planning Department Staff:
1. 25 meetings
Budget Update:
March figures are unavailable at this time.
Transit Update:
"WAVE" Dial -a -Ride Ridership:
March 1989
Hermosa Beach riders - 984
Redondo Beach riders - 4742
Satellite point riders - 515
Total: 6241
C.U.P. Enforcement Update:
1. Casey's Isuzu was inspected and found to still be in
violation. A verbal warning was given of intent to cite.
2. Beach City Jammers was inspected and found to be in
compliance.
3. F.J. O'Conner Heating was inspected and found to still be in
violation; A letter has been issued to the District
Attorney's office requesting'a meeting between the owner and
city in an effort to bring him into compliance. Owner has
also been in contact with staff.
4. Hermosa Beach Yacht Club was inspected and warned about their
noise level.
POLICE CUP INSPECTIONS:
No violations were reported for Besties, The Lighthouse,
the Comedy and Magic Club, California Beach, End Zone,
Hermosa Saloon, Hennessey's Tavern, and Pier 52, other
than apparent noise violations.
* The Police Department has obtained a noise measuring
device, and is now in the process of training police
staff to use it.
Upcoming agenda items to City Council:
6 First Quarter General Plan Amendments
1 Extension of the moratorium regarding remodeling and
expansion of nonconforming structures or uses
1 Text Amendment regarding nonconforming uses and structures
1 City Council/Planning Commission workshop date and agenda
Respectfully submitted,
CONCUR:
Ingr Rademaker
Acting Assistant Planner
Michael Schubach
Director
2
April 18, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City Council Meeting of
April 25, 1989
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES
MARCH, 1989 ACTIVITY REPORT
The Department of Community Resources
following activities for the month of
has been involved in the
March.
RECREATION PROGRAMING
The Spring Recreation program began on March 27.
Enrollments for the classes are as follows:
Adult Classes
Tennis
Beach Volleyball
Computer
Karate
Social Dance
Youth Classes
26 Tennis 8
60 Beach Volleyball 7
5 Computer Cancelled
N/A Karate 4
8 Acting/Theatre 9
Jazz Dance 9
Total 98
Total 38
March 20 - 25 staff conducted Easter Week Activities for
youth culminating with the Easter Egg Hunt on Saturday,
March 25 (co-sponsored by the Community Center Foundation
and Jaycees). Over all participation in the week's events
(which included crafts, movies, contests and the "Hunt")
was approximately 300.
COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION
. On March 11, The Canadian Brass hit the Hermosa Civic
Theare stage. The concert was extremely well-received by
the audience (400 attended).
• Plans for a Foundation Board Workshop to be conducted on
April 22 at the Center were initiated. At this meeting,
the Board plans to discuss goals and objectives for the
upcoming years.
OLD HERMOSA SCHOOLHOUSE PROJECT
• On March 27, the committee assigned to examine alternative
uses for the Prospect School Building met for the first
time (see attached minutes). To date, meetings have
focused on the physical condition of the building,
potential uses and its potential to be listed on historical
registries.
6
FILM PERMITS
• In March, there
as follows:
were five (5) days of filming. Fees were
Permit Fees Parking Police Staffing
$3,600 $1,200 *$2,860
Total $7,660
* Police Department billing not computed to date.
MEETINGS
• Staff attended the following meetings: Commission, City
Council, Foundation, Coordinating Council, SCAATS, Old
Schoolhouse, Foundation Subcommittee and seven event
planning meetings.
FACILITY RESERVATIONS
• In March we received approximately 45 calls per week
regarding facility reservations.
• New reservations this month include: H. B. School
District, H. B. Coordinating Council, Doyle Reception,
Roberts Reception, Internal Revenue Service, H. B.
Management Assoc.
COMMUNITY CENTER MEETING ROOMS
Hope Chapel
Community Center Foundation
Community Center Advisory Commission
Friends of the Arts (FOTA)
Teen Advocate
Chamber of Commerce
Little League
Pre/Post Exercise
SuperKids Gym
1736 Family Crisis Center
Old Prospect Task Force
School Attend. Review Board (SARB)
COMMUNITY CENTER GYMNASIUM
Cooley Basketball
Colen Basketball
General Services
Cascio Basketball
Byron Basketball
Artiano Basketball
Cohen Basketball
Friedman Basketball
AARP Tax Service
H. B. School District
H. B. Personnel
Jewish Comm. Center
Jazz Dance
Karate
Sister Cities
Unity Church
Building Dept.
I B S
Internal Revenue Ser.
COMI4UNITY CENTER LEASES
Easter Seals
Project Touch
Hope Chapel
Salvation Army
Dispute Resolution
So. Bay Free Clinic
Teen Advocate Center
Botelho Basketball
Comm. Center Spring Program
Easter Seals
SuperKids Gymnastics
Meistrell Basketball
COMMUNITY CENTER THEATRE
Hope Chapel
H B School District
Jewish Comm. Center
I B S
Comm. Center Spring Program
Canadian Brass
Air Conditioning Installation
CLARK BUILDING
We average three private parties
per month in addition to the following
weekly/monthly meetings.
Jazzercise
Aerobics
Senior Exercise
Senior Club Meeting
Women's Club
Superkids
Sunday AA meeting
Monday AA meeting
South Bay Unity Church
Garden Club
CLARK FIELD
Slow Pitch
Little League
Dog Obedience
Maintenance (March 1st - 24th)
DEPARTMENT REVENUE:
Noted:
See
attached.
/7
Kevin B. Northc'aft
City Manager
Historical Society
Association for Retarded
Citizens (ARC)
VALLEY PARK RESERVATIONS
January, 1988
February, 1988
March, 1988
April, 1988
May, 1988
June, 1988
July, 1988
August, 1988
September, 1988
October, 1988
November, 1988
December, 1988
January, 1989
February, 1989
March, 1989
Respectfully submitted
1
0
4
7
7
18
16
14
7
8
3
2
1
2
8
lana Mastrian-Handaian
Director
Dept. of Community Resources
OLD HERMOSA SHOOLHOUSE PROJECT
MARCH 27, 1989, MEETING
MINUTES
I. Roll Call:
Present: Ginny Shoren, Steve Crecy, Jerry Compton, Sue
Horger, J. R. Reviczky
Staff: Mary Rooney
II. Selection of Chairperson: Ginny Shoren/All Ayes
Vice Chair: J. R. Reviczky/All Ayes
III. Update on present condition of school site:
Jerry Compton submitted a written list of necessary repairs:
attached
Motion: Submit a letter to the Community Resources
Commission asking them to request that Council allocate funds
(and/or work necessary) to take care of the major repairs
that have resulted from neglect in long-term maintenance.
Crecy/Shoren All Ayes
Staff will draft a letter and mail a copy to each committee
member for review.
IV. Alternative uses for site:
The committee wishes to keep the following alternatives "on
the list" for future discussions:
1) Youth activity center
2) Meeting hall
3) Lease to pre-school
4) Rent to non-profit agency(ies)
5) Historical Society Museum
6) Community garden/expand park to rear of building
7) Senior Center/tots
8) Reading Room
9) Exhibit hall
V. Historical Registry
Committee wishes to examine this issue after the next
Historical Society meeting (April 12, 4:00 p.m.)
1
VI. Funding Sources
Committee will consider the following options:
City General Fund
Park and Recreation Fund
Public/Private Grants
Donations
VII. Next Meeting
April 12, 6:00
p.m.
(after Historical Society Meeting)
Staff is requested to bring:
. School District Survey Results
. Clark Building Rental List
. Sale Agreement for Schoolhouse
. Amount of Park and Recreation Fund
VIII. Adjournment: 9:00 p.m.
Compton/Crecy All Ayes
Wale G/57
a/&;RJ f /20,7 ,gi/2640/ 4
- Zoon efr~- —
4ri-e2/c / 6/ 6~44 —
kJ/w/a)
/0o1/2/6/r/1
• TSG S ��� /GA����° � � � �i2 PA,70,c-f
fiftyv ,x(77,t4 "7,417 of',1041/A1-•
• Gl�� ��/ic�ii-�o P�Sff �u XMX- p/�v/O6
DEPT. OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES REVENUE TO DATE
FEBRUARY 28, 1989
1987-88 1988-89
COMMUNITY CENTER RENTALS $36,030.00 $39,079.61
COMMUNITY CENTER LEASES $43,221.54 $55,970.33
COMMUNITY CENTER THEATRE $10,434.89 $12,493.63
CLARK BUILDING* $19,557.75 $20,372.50
SPECIAL EVENTS* $18,057.70 $25,077.50
TENNIS COURTS $ 8.656.25 $ 8,187.20
135,958.13 161,180.77*
*Finance report groups these two categories under the heading
"Other Facilities".
*Final report from Finance Department not printed yet so these are
Department's figures.
1
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES
REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 1988/89
MARCH, 1989
REVENUE
COMMUNITY CENTER RENTALS $5,260.50
COMMUNITY CENTER LEASES 8,321.00
COMMUNITY CENTER THEATRE 2,166.00
CLARK BUILDING 1,413.50
SPECIAL EVENTS 5,032.00
TENNIS COURTS 1,233.75
$23,426.75
REVENUE TO DATE:
3/89 3/88
$161,180.77 $135,958.13
REVENUE PROJECTION: PRESENT FISCAL YEAR: $194,500
REVENUE: ACTUAL: LAST FISCAL YEAR: $189,078
COMMUNITY RESOURCES DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND REVENUE FOR 75 %
OF THE FISCAL YEAR IS $161,180.77 OR 83 % OF THE
PROJECTED FIGURE.
COMMUNITY RESOURCES EXPENDITURES FOR 75 % OF THE
FISCAL YEAR IS % OR $
*Will distribute copies of completed March expenditure report as
soon as final figures are received from the Finance Department.
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
MARCH 1989
OFFENSES REPORTED
THIS MONTH
THIS MONTH
THIS MONTH
ONE YEAR AGO
YEAR TO DATE
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
1. Murder
0
1
0
2
2. Rape
0
0
0
1
3. Robbery
3
3
9
6
4. Assault
12
5
35
16
5. Burglary
- 29
21
76
75
6. Larceny
35
26
112
97
7. Motor Vehicle Theft
14
13
34
42
8. DUI
19
34
47
98
9. All Other Offenses
312
279
740
862
PERSONS ARRESTED
In/1'414u nsrvnl
THIS MONTH
THIS MONTH
ONE YEAR AGO
YEAR TO DATE
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
1. Adults
67
109
200
321
2. Juveniles
0
1
0
1
3. Criminal Citations
122
63
208
164
4. 5-24/5-42 HNC
32
*
32
*
In/1'414u nsrvnl
THIS MONTH
THIS MONTH
THIS MONTH
ONE YEAR AGO
YEAR TO DATE
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
ACCIDENTS
0
0
0
0
f, Fatal
2. Injury
11
12
36
39
3. Property damage only
20
23
59
60
CITATIONS
315
203
1041
740
1. Traffic Citations
2. Parking Citations
57
15
68
46
CALLS FOR SERVICE
* figures not available
NOTED:
evin B. Northcraft, City Manager
tfully s bmitted,
/lass_
‘ga'
Steve Wisiewski
Director of Public Safety
THIS MONTH
THIS MONTH
ONE YEAR AGO
YEAR TO DATE
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
1. Total Calls
2079
1871
5611
5407
* figures not available
NOTED:
evin B. Northcraft, City Manager
tfully s bmitted,
/lass_
‘ga'
Steve Wisiewski
Director of Public Safety
HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
MARCH 1989
FIRE STATISTICS
PARAMEDIC STATISTICS
THIS MONTH
THIS MONTH
ONE YEAR AGO
YEAR TO DATE
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
1. Total Calls
79
60
247
208
(TYPE)
a. False Alarm
5
10
15
19
b. Mutual Aid
- 0
2
0
4
c. Paramedic Assists
36
34
113
113
d. Residence Fire
7
2
24
10
e. Commercial Fire
3
2
10
4
f. Vehicle Fire
2
*
8
*
g. Hazardous Mtls.
3
*
8
*
h. Other
23
10
69
58
PARAMEDIC STATISTICS
1. Mutual Aid
THIS MONTH
THIS MONTH
ONE YEAR AGO
YEAR TO DATE
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
1. Total Responses
77
83
244
264
(TYPE)
a. No Patient/Aid
6
12
24
38
b. Medical
34
37
102
108
c. Trauma
36
44
117
128
1. Mutual Aid
0
0
0
0
2. Auto Accident
24
9
51
43
3. Strand Accident
3
8
11
21
4. Assault
7
8
24
25
5. Jail
4
10
15
25
6. Transports
39
25
121
108
7. Base Hosp.Con.
23
22
67
58
8. Trauma Center
0
0
3
1
INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION
THIS MONTH
THIS MON1H
ONE YEAR AGO
YEAR TO DATE
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
1. Commercial
38
142
239
290
2. Assembly
0
0
0
0
3. Apartments
21
25
73
51
4. Fumigations
10
11
43
35
5. Institutions
0
0
0
2
6. Industrial
0
5
5
10
* figures not available
NOTED:
Kevin B ort craf , City Manager
eve Wiswslci
mitted,
Director of Public Safety
Honorable Mayor and Members of
April 13, 1989
Regular Meeting
the Hermosa Beach City Council April 25, ,1989
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - APRIL 1989
The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major
functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance.
ADMINISTRATION
To coordinate and blend the efforts of all divisions of the
Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the
City Council and City Manager; includes engineering and
administration of capital improvement projects.
Permits Issued:
Type
This Last FY 88-89 FY
Month Month To -date 87-88
Sewer Demolition 4 4 42 46
Sewer Lateral 0 2 13 28
Street Excavation 6 13 62 114
Utility Co's only 16 14 186 276
Dumpster/Lumber Drop 3 0 18 20
Banner Permits 3 1 10 9
ENGINEERING
Status of Current Capital Improvement Projects:
The status of the Capital Improvement Projects will not be ad-
dressed in this report as the status of these projects is being
presented to Council at this meeting in the third quarter report.
Highlights of projects in progress:
CIP 87-170 Slurry Sealing CIP 87-405 Sewer Rehab. Area 3
CIP 85-138 FAU, Traffic Sig. CIP 88-610 Comm. Ctr. Theatre
Air Conditioning
MAINTENANCE
The maintenance division of the Public Works Department is
divided into the following sections:
- Parks/Medians - Traffic Safety
- Street Maintenance/Sanitation - Building Maintenance
- Sewer and Storm Drains - Equipment Service
- Street Lighting
The Parks Division completed the baseball field at Clark stadium
for the Little League which included infield irrigation repairs.
1
Completed City-wide inspection of contract work in parks and
medians. Continued with irrigation repairs on the Greenbelt area
and City-wide.
Street Maintenance crew installed chain link fence at ,the old
Prospect School (6th & Prospect). Filled collapsed areas on
streets at 1132 Palm Drive and and 2900 block of Manhattan Ave.,
plus potholes City-wide (00 block 14th Court; Prospect at Gentry;
30th St. W of PCH; 500 block 6th St.; Monterey & 8th St.; Beach
Dr. at 16th & 17th Streets; 8th St. at Palm Drive. Made frame
for marquee at the Community Center. Completed concrete pour (4
yds) at 30th Street and Hermosa Avenue.
Street Lighting crew began preparation for the, installation of 22
new light poles on Pier Avenue. Re -set clocks City-wide for time
change.
Traffic Safety Division - assisted with "set-ups" and
"break -downs" for the Biltmore Task Force Committee. Painted
school x-ing and stop at 16th and Loma Drive. Re -painting of
stops and crosswalks after slurry sealing.
The crew in the sewer and storm drain division performed the
on-going tasks of checking and rodding sewer lines, checking the
pumps and manholes; cleared the storm drains on the beach with
the bulldozer. Performed miscellaneous sewer cap and hook-up
inspections. Rodded the drain at the Clark Building kitchen.
Assisted with concrete pour at 30th St & Hermosa Ave. and form
for marquee.
The Building Maintenance Division - Maintenance workers assisted
in janitorial duties due to absence of a custodian; cleaned
storage area at the Community Center; repaired doors at the
Police Department; sandblasted and primed steps at Community
Center; worked on trash enclosure at Clark Field.
Equipment Service - completed sandblasting of the Public Works
#14 dump truck in preparation of painting. Secured bid$ for
Police Department units regarding body work on vehicles involved
in accidents. Parts inventory and on-going vehicle maintenance.
Mandating of vehicle inspection sheets.
Respectfully submitted,
Antny Antich
Director of Puklic Works
mon2/pwadmin
:mv
Noted:
Kevin B.6Northcr
City Manager
Honorable Mayor and Members of
the Hermosa Beach City Council
April 17, 1989
City Council Meeting of
April 25, 1989
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
ACTIVITY REPORT, MARCH 1989
- The Finance Department is once again participating in the JTPA
(Job Training Partnership Act) program. The participant works 39
hours per week.
- Meetings of the ATSF financing committee continued. Mark Northcross
of Kelling, Northcross and Nobriga met with the committee again
regarding specifics of the Independent Cities Lease Finance
Authority.
- Reimbursement of $1,211.00 from the State was received for one of
the small mandated cost programs, Personal Safety Alarm Services
(Fire Department). Even though many programs are State mandated,
this is one of the few still eligible for reimbursement. It took
almost a year and half to receive the reimbursement.
STATISTICAL SECTION
FISCAL FISCAL
MARCH 1989 MARCH 1988 YEAR TO YEAR TO
DATE 89 DATE 88
CITATION PAYMENTS 5,042 5,895 42,845 44,076
INVOICES 3 7 63 91
CASH RECEIPTS 1,419 1,636 10,674 11,583
WARRANTS 299 284 2,723 2,389
PURCHASE ORDERS -i 316 297 2,651 2,489
UUT EXEMPTIONS 598 574
FILED TO DATE
PAYROLL FULL TIME 155 148
PART TIME 48 44
Noted:
City Manager
Viki Copeland
Finance Administrator