Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/13/89"It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, • it's what we know that ain't so." -Will Rogers AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 13, 1989 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 6:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR June Williams MAYOR PRO TEM Roger Creighton COUNCILMEMBERS Jim Rosenberger Chuck Sheldon Etta Simpson CITY CLERK Kathleen Midstokke CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: INTRODUCTION OF INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY CHARLES S. VOSE ANNOUNCEMENT RECOGNIZING FLAG DAY, JUNE 14, 1989 PROCLAMATION: Honoring 50th anniversary of Little League Baseball, and proclaiming June 11-16, 1989 as National Little League Week. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the item is called. Citizen comments on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction will be provided time at the end of the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council'. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) (a) (b) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on May 22, 1989; 2) 'Regular meeting of the City Council held on May 23, 1989; 3) Special meeting of the City Council held on June 1, 1989. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive and cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the May, 1989 invest- ment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated June 6, 1989. (e) (f) (g) (i) (j) Recommendation to authorize completion of sale of sur- plus land sold at public auction (634 1st St., 705 1st St., 704 1st P1.). Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated May 30, 1989. Recommendation to approve re -appointment of Mr. Scott Ingell to the Private Industry Council of the Job Train- ing Partnership Act. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated June 5, 1989. Recommendation to accept and file report regarding the audit and evaluation of Public Safety dispatch system. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated May 16, 1989. Recommendation to adopt resolution endorsing the ap- plication for FY 1989-90 Proposition A Subregional Incentive Funds for the Hermosa/Redondo joint Dial -A - Ride program known as the "WAVE". Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated June 6, 1989. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #19033 for a three -unit condominium at 1078 Monterey Boulevard. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 6, 1989. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #19513 for a two -unit condominium at 610 Palm Drive. - 2 - (k) (0) (P) (g) (r) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 6, 1989. Recommendation to approve renewal of. lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Project Touch for office space (Room 11) of the Community Center. Memora- num. from Community. Resources Director Alana Mastrian- Handman dated June 1, 1989. Recommendation toapprove lease agreement between the 'City of Hermosa Beach and Project Touch for additional office space (Room 3) in the Community Center. Memoran- dum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated June 1, 1983. Recommendation to approve selection of Purkiss Rose to develop Master Plan for Parks and Recreation in an amount not to exceed $33,978, waive any irregularities with regard to late submissions, and appropriate $8,978 from Prospective Expenditures to Dept. of Community Resources.. Memorandum from Community Resources Direc- tor Alana Mastrian-Handman dated June 1, 1989. Recommendation to receive and file Planning project timetable. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 6, 1989. Recommendation to approve addition of the American Beach Volleyball League's 4 -man tournament to the list of beach volleyball tournaments held in Hermosa Beach this summer. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dated June 6, 1989. Recommendation to accept and file report from Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission regarding School District properties. Letter from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dated May 25, 1989. Recommendation to accept as complete slurry seal and asphalt street repair project, CIP 87-180 and CIP 88- 171. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony An- tich dated June 6, 1989. ��\\ Recommendati 0 ward contract for itity Center fire alaq�' em, CIP 88-604. dum from Public Works Dirtor Anthony Antich daJune 6, 1989. Recommendation to adopt three resolutions establishing traffic signal locations, establishing 12 -hour parking areas, and establishing curbside handicapped parking zones. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 31, 1989. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3 ORDINANCE NO. 89-990 - AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO DELETE VIDEO SALES AND 'RENTALS IN THE C-1 AND C-2 ZONES, NEIGHBORHOOD COM- MERCIAL AND RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL AND APPROVING AN EN- VIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adaption. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM•THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) Letter from Shane MCColgan, Pulse Fitness Systems', 934 Hermosa Avenue, Suite 11, Hermosa Beach, re. parking for expansion of business. (Requested by Mayor Williams). SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS 5. REVIEW OF GRADING PLAN AND EXTENSION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR POWER STREET SUBDIVISION, TRACT NO. 30986. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M.. 6. CONSIDERATION OF 1989-1990 BUDGET AND FIVE YEAR CAPITAL MPROVEMENT PROJECTS PROGRAM, with resolution adopting ;d6;r'I budget and resolution establishing the appropriation limit for 1989-90. Memorandum from Finance Administra- tor Viki Copeland dated June 6, 1989. 7. CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1989-1990, with or- dinance for waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 23, 1989. 8. CONFIRMATION OF FY 89-90 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT AS- SESSMENT, with resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 23, 1989. 9. PROPOSED INTERIM ORDINANCE REQUIRING PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW OF HIGHER DENSITY CONSTRUCTION ON R-2 LOTS. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 6, 1989. 10. PROPOSED ORDINANCE RE. CITY COUNCIL APPEAL PROCEDURE AND FEE. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 6, 1989. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 11. RECOMMENDATION RE. USE OF MOTORCYCLES FOR TRAFFIC EN- FORCEMENT. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. North - craft dated June 8, 1989. 12. RECOMMENDATION RE. RECLASSIFICATION PROCEDURE. (Oral report from Councilmember Roger Creighton and Personnel Director Robert Blackwood) 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER. 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Vacancies - Boards and Commissions 1) Appointment to vacancy on Civil Service Commission. for unexpired term ending July 15, 1992. Memoran- dum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated. June 6, 1989. 2) Authorization to advertise for one (1) Planning Commission expiration of term ending June 30, 1989. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated June 6, 1989. 3) Authorization to advertise for three (3) Parks, Recreation & Community Resources Advisory Commis- sion expiration of terms ending June 30, 1989. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated June 6, 1989. 15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) (b) (c) Request by Mayor Williams for discussion re. installing bathroom facilities at Sixth and Prospect, Fort Lots of Fun. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. Request by Councilmember Rosenberger for discussion re. concern about false information being presented with signatures. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis- cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. Request by Mayor Williams to consider allowing driveway permits for compact cars, said permits to be stamped "Compact Cars Only". Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis- cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. (d) Request by Mayor Williams for review of Strand "flashing walk lights" policy. 5 (e) Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis- cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. Request by Councilmember Creighton for consideration of placing on ballot recent initiative without signature verification expense. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis- cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. ADJOIIRNMENT CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS ,Where there is no vision the people perish... • HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. CITY VISION A .fess dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are.borne by visitor/users; led by a City Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers • THE'HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa $each bas the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The• Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration Is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY • The following explanations may help you to understand the terms • found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items • A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on• certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City -Clerk, prior to the Hearing. • Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal • requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government•revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week later'Council•may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting. Miscellaneous Items and Reports .City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items -to the attention ' of, or for action by the City Council. . Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since. the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of the City Council may place items onithe agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. • Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle'Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business' district. • June 6, 1989 Honorable Mayor add Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 13, 1989 1989-90 REVISED BUDGET AND FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the,City Council: - Adopt resolution 8approving and adopting the 1989-90 revised budget (Exhibit A) , Z,//j - Adopt resolution 89-1 approving and adopting the annual appropriations limit for 1989-90 (Exhibit B) Receive and file the answers to questions raised at tle work- shop_; AMa 22, 1989 (Exhibit C) ,,�� J$ •j c/i Receive and file the revised summary of capital improvement projects (Exhibit D) ,/i f" �+ f' _--'a BACKGROUND On May 22, 1989, the City Council reviewed the Preliminary 1989-90 Budget. Straw votes were taken on proposed revisions and a list of items requiring further information was compiled for reply back to Council June 13, 1989. ANALYSIS The next step in the budget process is a public hearing and adoption of a budget resolution (Exhibit A). Attached to the budget resolution is the Budget Summary which recaps the entire budget, including capital improvements. The City Council took a straw vote on May 22, 1989 to delete the electrovote-system from the City Council Budget. That change is reflected in the summary and in the City Council Department as reflected on Exhibit Al. A resolution adopting the appropriations limitation for 1989-90 (Exhibit B) is also required. The final budget document will contain this limitation amount, $9,995,462 and the appropriations that are subject to the limit, $6,801,026. Appropriations subject to the limit are 68% of the amount allowed, which means that the city still has a comfortable margin between appropriations and the limitation. Exhibit C is the list of questions from the budget workshop. Each department prepared responses to questions in their area of responsibility. These responses were then compiled into one document with attachments for the City Council. 1 r Exhibit D is the revised summary of the Five Year Capital Improvement Program. The format has been changed to show: - City goals - Previous year expenditures - Current year funded, - Funding Sources unfunded City Council requested that CIP 89-142, Sidewalk Repairs, be funded in FY 89-90. The revised CIP budget shows an estimate of $326,000 as unfunded for the project. Staff will request an appropriation for the project when proposals are received and the exact amount is known. Proceeds from the sale of city property will be the proposed funding source as suggested at the workshop. The revised summary also reflects $5,000 for Council Chamber replacement chairs as part of the $30,000 appropriated to CIP 89-609, City Hall Expansion. Other changes requested at the workshop are: - CIP 93-145, Utility Undergrounding, description of project expanded to include "and other priority areas" - CIP 91-143, Strand Walkway, use of asphalt will not be considered, only concrete • CIP 91-511, Railroad Right-of-way Parking Lot, project will move up one year to 1990-91 The individual CIP pages will be revised for the final printing of budget. Concur: Kevin . Northp%ait City Manager VC/kc 2 Viki Cop land Finance Administrator 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 WHEREAS, a budget for the fiscal year 1989-90 has been prepared by the City Manager, and WHEREAS, said budget incorporates expenditures for operating purposes, capital outlay and capital improvement projects; and WHEREAS, said budget includes the appropriations limit and total annual appropriations subject to limitation as required by Section 37200 of the Government Code. WHEREAS, the City Council has examined said budget and, after due deliberation and consideration, has made such amend- ments to the budget as it deems advisable. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council does hereby approve and adopt the revised budget for the 1989-90 Fiscal Year as pre- sented in the document entitled "City of Hermosa Beach Budget Summary 1989-90" as amended by the City Council through June 13, 1988, and summarized as follows: (Attached as "Exhibit A") PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Exhibit A ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovernmental/State Intergovernmental/County Intergovernmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/89 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget Capital Outlay Capital Improvements SUBTOTAL PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL FUNDS APPROPRIATED ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/90 *DESIGNATED FUR: ASSET REPLACEMENT CAP IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 1989-90 GENERAL FUND $5,861,948 $264,205 $175.000 $376,770 $847.607 $00 $359,971 $6,680 $7,892,181 $1,742,785 $9,634,966 $2,334,090 $11,969,056 $8,745,324 $451.704 $301,000 $9,498,028 $786.226 $10,284.254 $1,684,802 * $120,000 $443,165 **RETAINED EARNINGS RESERVED AND FIXED ASSETS LIGHTING FUND $348,094 $0 0 $61,2$ 0 $0U $00 $0 $409,324 $409,324 $1,309,290 $1,718,614 $319,804 $2,000 $46,500 $368,304 521,500 $389.804 $1.328,810 CONTINGENCY AFFORD HSG PARKING FUND STATE GAS COUNTY GAS PARK REC TAX FUND TAX FUND FAC TAX FUND $0 $0 $48,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,585,746 $0 $0 $0 5128,527 518,685 51,745 $25,405 $0 $271,070 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $819,688 $0 $0 $0 $100 $0 $0 $175.000 $2,534,061 $289,755 549,745 5250,405 $5,000 52,534,061 $294,755 $49,745 $250,405 51,256,676 $226,577 $41,167 $638,811 53,790,737 5521,332 590,912 $889,216 $971,872 $90,050 $15,000 51,076,922 $1.423,639 $2,500,561 $1,290.176 ** Exhibit A $1,007.006 $111,831 $335,000 $335,000 $47,272 $382,272 $139.060 $86,570 $0 $86,570 $48,000 $5,000 $48,000 $91,570 $42,912 $797,646 *** ***PROSPECT PARK $50.000 REVISED 6/13/89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 1989-90 UUT RR RIGHT OF WAY FUND ESTIMATED REVENUE 67.UUT REV SHARING CDBG PROP A FUND FUND FUND FUND Taxes $816,508 $1,224,762 FUND TO BE $0 $216.331 Licenses/Permits $0 $0 CLOSED $0 $0 Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 $U Use of Money/Property $20.525 $2,890 $0 $12,270 Intergovernmental/State $ 8 50 $0 $0 0 Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $122.762 $0 Current Service Charges $0 $O $U $11,800 Other Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $837,033 $1,227,652 $122,762 $240,401 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $837.033 $1,227.652 $122,762 $240,401 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/89 $1,437.804 $127,119 $0 $246,641 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $2,274.837 $1,354,771 $122,762 $487,042 PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $122,762 $237.759 Capital Outlay Capital Improvementa $55,000 SUBTOTAL PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS $0 $0 $122,762 $292.759 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $1,354.771 $1.254 TOTAL FUNDS APPROPRIATED $1.354.771 $122,762 $294.013 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE FUND TO BE 6/30/90 52.274.837 * $0 CLOSED $0 $193.029 *DESIGNATION FOR OPEN SPACE DESIGNATION FOR ATSF PURCHASE (SEAVIEW PROCEEDS) $200.000 $281,459 REVISED 6/13/89 ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovernmental/State Intergovernmental/County Intergovernmental/Federal Current Service Charges Other Revenue TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/89 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget Capital Outlay Capital Improvements SUBTOTAL PROPOSED APPROPRIATION INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL FUNDS APPROPRIATED ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/90 GRANT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 1989-90 CR GRD FUND $78,495 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,315 $1,010 $125.704 $0 $0 $0 $675,258 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $803,277 $79,505 $64.388 $867,665 $79,505 $57,759 $925,424 $709.908 $709,908 $709,908 $215,516 SEWER FUND $0 $0 $0 $60,610 $0 $5,000 $0 $29,200 $0 $94,810 $1,154,771 $1,249,581 ASSET FORF FIRE PROTECT INSURANCE FUND FUND FUND $0 $0 $200,000 $5,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $205,900 $205.900 $42,661 $705,959 $150.213 5122,166 $1,955,540 $356.113 $55,180 $55.180 $6,672 $61.852 $60,314 $135.686 $9.070 $1,773,758 $1.918,514 $37,026 $1.955,540 $0 $185,612 $33,600 $219,212 $15.591 $234,803 $121.310 $0 $0 $0 $4,980 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000 $134.980 $134.980 $0 $0 $0 $37,785 $0 $0 $0 $o $37.785 $899,168 $936,953 $137,822 $131.051 $272,802 $1,068,004 $100,000 $899.168 $100,000 $325 $100,325 $172,477 $899,168 $118,836 $1.018.004 $50,000 * *CONTINGENCY TOTAL $8,644,138 $264.205 $1,960.746 $760.647 $1.244,381 $5.000 5798,020 $1,220,659 $311,780 $15.209,576 $3,866.112 $19,075.688 $0 $8.843.640 $27.919,328 $11,773,167 $586,424 $3,322,736 $15.682,327 $3,866,112 $19,548,439 $8,370,889 REVISED 6/13/89 1 DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL OBJECT CODES AUTHORIZED 88-89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET 1989-1990 DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION 89-90 CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION 89-90 4102 REGULAR SALARIES SECRETARY 0.50 0.50 0.50 CLERK TYPIST 0.25 0.12 0.12 4112 PART-TIME TEMPORARY CITY COUNCILMEMBERS 5 5 5 TOTAL 5.75 5.62 5.62 OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4201 CONTRACT SVC./ PRIVATE: 4315 MEMBERSHIP: 4317 CONFERENCE: 4319 SPECIAL EVENTS: 5401 EQUIPMENT LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT MORE THAN $500 BUDGET EXPLANATIONS EXPLANATION Holiday decorations 50/50 match w/Chamber of Commerce $2,500 League of Cities - State $2,318; League of Cities - L.A. Division $625; So. Cal. Assoc. of Governments $863; West Basin Water Assoc. $100; So. Bay Cities Assoc. $200; Independent Cities Assoc. $776; Rails to Trails Conservancy $18. $1,000/yr. per Councilmember; Medal of Valor $250 Proclamations, plaques, mementos, flowers, etc. prepared and presented on behalf of the City $1,000. Lights for speaker's time $100; ElectroVote Systems $2,800. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS: Delete Electrovote Exhibit Al 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 WHEREAS, the voters of California on November 6, 1979 added Article XIII B to the State Constitution placing various limit- ations on the appropriations of the state and local governments; and WHEREAS, Article XIII B provides that the appropriations limit for the fiscal year 1989-90 is calculated by adjusting the base year appropriations of fiscal year 1978-79 for changes in the cost of living and population; and WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach has complied with all of the provisions of Article XIII B in determining the appropria- tions limit for fiscal year 1989-90; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS; SECTION 1. That for the City of Hermosa Beach the appropria- tions limit in the fiscal year 1989-90 shall be $9,995,462. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Exhibit B Budget Workshop Questions/Answers May 22, 1989 The following questions were asked at the budget workshop of 5/22/89. Responses have been prepared by the department noted parenthesis after the answer. 1. QUESTION ANSWER 2. QUESTION ANSWER - What is the breakdown of property taxes between residential and commercial? in - Property taxes are collected by the County of Los Angeles. The only breakdown used to categorize the taxes is secured and unsecured. The unsecured category does contain commercial personal property and improvements. However, the secured category contains both residental and commercial land, therefore a clear picture cannot be ascertained from the information available. There is a report available from the County Assessor that would detail the use code for all secured property, thereby giving us the breakdown between commerical/residential. The cost for the County to produce the report is $300-400. Staff would recommend acquiring the report after the new assessed values are available in July. (Finance) - What are per capita amounts for revenue and expenditures over the past five years? Expenditures for the five or six largest departments are requested. - Exhibit Cl shows the trend of total General Fund revenue and expenditure per capita as a gradual increase over five years. Exhibit C2 lists the actual totals for each year of the past five years. The only comparative data readily available is census data for 1984-85. From census data, general revenue and expenditures per capita for two neighboring cities are shown below: Manhattan Beach Redondo Beach Hermosa Beach Revenue Per Capita $481 $652 $392 Expenditure Per Capita $418 $575 $393 Hermosa Beach has considerably less available to spend than either of these two cities. Exhibit C3 shows expenditures per capita for the seven largest departments. The level of Exhibit C expenditure increases slightly each year but is very consistent overall for each department. Exhibit C4 is a closeup for several cities of the two revenue sources that produce almost 5070 of our General Fund revenue - property tax and sales tax. As shown on the bar chart, Hermosa Beach has a good property tax base, but is the lowest of all the surrounding cities in sales tax per capita. (Finance) 3. QUESTION - What services are offered by Dispute Resolution Services? Has the scope and cost been increased over last year, ie, for minor criminal disputes? ANSWER - The scope of services and cost has not changed since the original contract was approved by Council. See Exhibit C5 for specifics on the contract. (Community Resources) 4. QUESTION - Is a data processing study needed for the entire City, perhaps using a consultant? Timetable, cost effectiveness analysis needed. A five year plan is being prepared by the Data Processing Department that incorporates department's perceived needs for hardware/software and a determination by Hewlett Packard of upgrades necessary to accommodate these needs. The document is being prepared in the format used by Cathedral City, who used the firm of Arthur Young & Company for their plan. El Segundo's plan has also been reviewed. Staff recommends that the need for a consultant be considered at Midyear Budget Review after the staff report is reviewed by the Council and Manager. (General Services) 5. QUESTION - Escalating cost of employee benefits is a concern. How can costs be controlled, ie, employee negotiations, shopping different plans? ANSWER Several cost containment factors are already in place for the indemnity medical plan: increased deductible ($250), preferred provider plan, second opinion prior to surgery, prior approval for hospital admissions and pre-service reviews for benefit determination. The deductible was increased from $100 to $250 through employee organization negotiations. The City actively markets all insurance plans each benefit year through our broker. Staff will continue to explore cost containment features and increased employee contribution for premiums through negotiations. (Personnel) 6. QUESTION - What is the feasibility of traffic cameras? ANSWER - The City of Monterey Park has done a feasibility study on use of traffic cameras. Staff has requested a copy and will provide the information to the City Council when it is received. (Public Safety) 7. QUESTION - What is the cost of police personnel for movie details and other special events and how much was reimbursed?. ANSWER - The total amount billed for reimbursement this fiscal year is $29,239. Services are billed at $55/hour which recovers both direct and indirect cost, ie, overhead. The actual costs for providing this service are difficult to calculate since officers have various hourly rates. In order to provide an exact figure staff would have to hand search each month and calculate the costs which would be very time consuming. The average overtime rate for officers is $23.00. There were approximately 532 hours of special event security to date. Based on that, we estimate that the direct cost is approximately $12,236. (Public Safety) 8. QUESTION - What improvements has the Water Company paid for? ANSWER - See Exhibit C6 (Public Safety) 9. QUESTION - How many citations have been issued under the new dog ordinance and how many warnings issued on the right of way? Do we need more personnel to enforce? ANSWER - The ordinance went into effect May 15, 1989. Warnings were issued until June 1, when issuance of citations began. Warnings Issued - 18, 11 on the R -0-W Citations Issued - 2, both on R -0-W (June 1 - June 4) Citations normally average 50 per month. Two officers are being added in the 89-90 budget. More of the officers will be deployed to concentrate on animal control. If enforcement is inadequate, a request will be made at midyear. (General Services) What is current policy re lettering of street name signs? 10. QUESTION - ANSWER - Hermosa Beach is spelled hermosa Beach on signs. According to a long term Public Works employee, 11. QUESTION - ANSWER - 12. QUESTION - ANSWER this was a Council decision after a contest ten or fifteen years ago. The Hermosa Beach logo contains capital H and a lower case b, as shown on our business cards and letterhead. (Public Works) Wbat are the maintenance activities for the School District's portion of Valley Park that the City will be implementing? See Exhibit C7 (Public Works) There is a concern about the lack of parking for Clark Field. Do hours for parking along Valley Drive need to be looked at? - Availability and adequacy of parking for recreational facilities will be addressed by the master plan for parks and recreation. Currently, to accommodate the activity at Clark Field and the Clark Buildings there are 91 paved spaces as well as the unpaved area along the right-of-way. These spaces are also used by residents for visitors and additional vehicles. Extensive construction of multi -unit dwellings in the surrounding neighborhood is also bound to increase the competition for spaces. A if so desired by Council. s a short term solution, staff recommends that ours of parking in the paved spaces on the ight-of-way and at the Clark Building be changed rom 12 hour parking to 4 hour parking from 8 a.m. o 8 p.m. These hours will allow for greater urnover during peak hours, as well as providing vernight residential use. (General Services) resolution will be prepared to enact this change 4 PER CAPITA REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 1983-84 THROUGH 1987-88 REVENUE EXPEND GENERAL FUND -MIMI - 1989-84 1984-88 1988-86 1986-87 1987-88 Exhibit C1 GENERAL FUND REVENUE/EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA REVENUE EXPENDITURES 1983-84 $272.33 $351.56 1984-85 $392.06 $393.29 1985-86 $460.76 $412.09 1986-87 $501.55 $463.31 1987-88 $517.71 $491.73 Exhibit C2 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA SELECTED DEPARTMENTS PW CR (Public Works) (Community Resources) P - F C_] (Police) (Fire) GS (Building) (General Services) Lh (Legal) 1984-85 1885-85 Exhibit C3 1888-87 1987-88 1 ES El Segundo) MB Manhattan Beach) R8 Redondo Beach) Santa Monica) SM T Torrance) (I Gardena) H8 iieacmrija PROPERTY TAX/SALES TAX PER CAPITA 1989-90 BUDGET SALES TAX PROP TAX PER CAPITA PER CAPITA .........:::: )4.43 145.39 L2.79 131.33 0 100 200 300 Exhibit C4 bispute Lauren Burton Resolution Director Services Loretta Francesco. f , ani Arrow Main Office: 2830 Pico Boulevard Santa Monica. CA 90405 (213) 450-5232 West Holli wood Office: 543 N. Fairfax Avenue Los Angeles. CA 90036 (213) 854-0122 MEDIATION INFORMATION Purpose: The primary goal of mediation is to assist people in the process of putting their dispute into manageable terms and help them arrive at a mutually satisfactory resolution of their dispute. The Process: Dispute Resolution Services, in cooperation with the City Attorney's/City Prosecutor's Office, seeks to involve parties to a conflict in an open dialogue that will result in a recognition of their differences and achieve a long-term solution to the dispute in the form of a settlement agreement. Disputants are directly involved in the resolution of their dispute with the assistance of a neutral trained mediator. The mediation is scheduled by DRS and/or the City Attorney's/Prosecutor's Office and may last from 1 to 3 hours. Although the content of the mediation is strictly confidential, the outcome or end result of the mediation is reported to the City Attorney's/Prosecutor's Office. Due to the informality of the pro- ceedings, there is no requirement for legal representation but the disputants do have the right to have an attorney present. However, attorneys are present only to advise their clients, not to partic- pate directly in the process. The mediator will ask both sides how they see the issues and what led to the filing of a criminal complaint or request for mediation. It is helpful for the conflicting parties to come to the session with a clear idea of how they see the issues and what they want out of the mediation experience. Settlement Agreements: Usually the settlement agreement is a reflect- ion of the parties' mutual concerns and helps govern the parties' future behavior or actions. This agreement may be written by the mediator and signed by the parties or it may be a verbal agreement. A copy of the written agreement or a summary of the verbal agree- ment remains on file with the City Attorney/Prosecutor. If no agree- ment is achieved, then the case will be referred back to the City Attorney's/Prosecutor's Office for review and final determination. HOW YOUR COMPLAINT GOES TO MEDIATION (DRS) Personal Request Police Report j `( ) CITY ATTORNEY'S/ ( Office Conference ) PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE ) ( ( Mediation at DRS Exhibit C5 Prosecution or Rejection A Non -Profit Corporation of the Los Angeles County Bar Association III. Precedent for Diversion Referral of Misdemeanor Cases to Dispute Resolution Centers. A. New York Perhaps the most successful program for diversion of misdemeanor cases to mediation is conducted by the New York Community Dispute Resolution Centers (CDRCs). During the past five years 702 to 802 of the case load of the Community Dispute Resolution Centers consisted of misdemeanor diversions. The program has been so successful that CDRCs have been set up in all 62 counties in the state of New York. Most importantly, 862 of the misdemeanor cases were resolved through successful mediations when both parties agreed to mediate.4 The New York State Legislature approved a 1988-89 grant for full and part-time CDRCs in all counties, the CDRCs being funded by the Unified Court System's Community Dispute Resolution Centers Program. Chief Administrative Judge Albert M. Rosenblatt declared at the May, 1988 Syracuse Conference on Mediation that alternative dispute resolution is a necessary relief valve for the court system. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 1988, New York CDRCs reported 103,292 contacts and referrals and conducted 19,945 conciliations, mediations and arbitrations, serving 56,678 people. Sixty-nine percent of the contacts involved criminal matters. 27,134 of the contacts involved 4For the fiscal year ended March 31, 1988, of the 41,542 cases handled by the New York Dispute Resolution Program, 26,978 cases or 68% were represented by the following types of misdemeanor complaints: No. of Cases % of Total Handled Cases Handled Aggravated assault 73 .3% Aggravated harassment 1,235 3.0% Assault 5,445 13.8% Criminal mischief 1,358 3.4% Forgery 20 .1% Fraud --bad check 850 2.2% Harassment 16,157 41.0% Menacing 912 2.3% Petit larceny 534 1.4% Reckless endangerment 115 .3% Theft of services 188 .5% Vandalism 49 .1% Violation of town/city ordinance 42 .1% 26,978 68.5% Source: The Community Dispute Resolution Centers Program Annual Report, April 1, 1987 to March 31, 1988. -4- misdemeanors, and 129 contacts involved felonies.5 Partly as a result of the success of the New York misdemeanor CDRC work, the legislature of that state amended the dispute resolution statutes to allow selected felonies to be diverted to mediation, with the consent of the prosecutor, defense counsel, defendant, victim and the court. See New York Criminal Procedure Law Section 215.10, et seq. In a commentary written immediately after the felony diversion program went into effect in New York on November 1, 1986, Peter Preiser wrote: "Article 215 was enacted at the request of the Office of Court Administration which administers a program for financing community dispute resolution centers run by nonprofit organizations. These centers, operating under contract with and regulated by the Chief Administrator. . ., have been accepting misdemeanors referred by the courts under a five-year old mediation and conciliation program termed a success by the Office of Court Administration. Accordingly, OCA requested and received legislative approval for expansion of the program to include selected felonies." Of course violent felonies, drug offenses and felonies committed by repeat offenders are excluded from the diversion program. Appropriate felony referrals to CDRCs are those crimes involving family, relatives, neighbors, acquaintances and others who have had some kind of recognizable past relationship. Of the disputes resolved by New York CDRCs during fiscal 1987, including both misdemeanor and felony matters, it may be helpful to analyze 5The Community Dispute Resolution Centers Program Annual Report, April 1, 1987 to March 31, 1988, Tables 1-11, pages 55-76. the different types of relationships that existed between defendant and victim. vd4 Acquaintances Boyfriend/girlfriend Consumer/merchant Divorced Employer/employee Ex-boyfriend/girlfriend Extended family Friend Immediate family Landlord/tenant Married Neighbors Room/housemate Separated Strangers Other Undetermined TOTAL 22.6% 1.3% 8.3% 1.72 1.2% 5.4% 2.02 4.4% 4.2% 12.82 1.7% 22.8% 0.7% 1.2% 5.5% 3.2% 1.0% 100.0% Court referrals accounted for 67% of all cases referred to the CDRCs during fiscal 1988, while police and sheriff departments referred 8%, district attorneys 4% and 10.7% of the cases were walk-ins. The average cost per request for service through the resolution process in fiscal 1988 was $18.90. $97.89 was the average cost per conciliation, mediation or arbitration, and the average cost per individual served through the conciliation, mediation or arbitration process was $21.11. Among the most prevalent referrals in New York during fiscal 1988 were bad check cases. As stated in the Annual Report covering the New York CDRCs s for fiscal 1987: "It was apparent that save for the problems of no response from complaining parties, mediation represents a serious alternative in responding to "bad check" problems. Very often citizens are limited to either ignoring the problem or seeking relief through local small claims court. Since there is no claims court option under New York State law, mediation of corporate transactions holds the potential for a speedier and more direct way to handle bad check cases." In summary, the resounding successes of the New York CDRC programs certainly warrant the creation of Dispute Resolution Centers in Los Angeles County and, eventually, the entire state. B. California 1. San Francisco Perhaps the most active entity which has actively mediated misdemeanor cases in California is the Center for Dispute Resolution in San Francisco. That Center was a program of the San Francisco Regional Office of the American Arbitration Association, and opened its doors on July 1, 1986. During fiscal 1986-87, 535 cases handled by the Center were referrals from the San Francisco criminal justice system (Municipal Courts, district attorney, public defender, police department and Youth Guidance Center). Of those disposed of during the fiscal year wherein all parties were contacted (377), there were 78 cases in which one or more parties refused to enter in to alternative dispute resolution processes. The remaining 299 cases were all successfully resolved through Center involvement. 2. Los Angeles The Neighborhood Justice Center of the Los Angeles County Bar Association has handled potential criminal cases referred to it by the City Attorney of Santa Monica since 1981. Disputants wishing to partake of the program are scheduled for mediation which may last from 1 to 3 hours. The Santa Monica City Attorney arranges the mediation, and although the content of the mediation is confidential, the outcome or result of the mediation is reported to the City Attorney's office. If no agreement is reached, then the case is referred back to the City Attorney's Office for review and final determination. 1 TO: Roger Creighton, City Councilmenber DATE: June 2, 1989 Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager SUBJECT: Improvements to Fire Flow system -- FROM: Steve Wisniewski What did the Water Co. pay for? Director of Public Safety ******************************************************************************* ******************************************************************************* According to my information, the Water Company has funded the portions of each of the following improvements as indicated by an *: Seven (7) hydrant head replacements have been completed *-none of these, all from fire flow fund Fifteen (15) new hydrants have been installed *-4 of these, the others funded by builders M89-78 731 feet of 6" water *-all of the main 836 feet of 8" water *-all of the main main has been installed main has been installed 1538 feet of 12" water main has been installed *-1218' of the main; the remaining 320' was funded by builders Five (5) hydrant head replacements are scheduled and pending installation *-all of these Four (4) new hydrants have been ordered and are pending installation *-none of these, all funded by builders Exhibit C6 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PARKS AND R.R. R—O—W LANDSCAPE QUANTITIES SCHOOL SITE ADJACENT TO VALLEY PARK ANNUAL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR CURRENT FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 1988 TO JUNE 30, 1989 LANDSCAPE ACTIVITIES UNITS APPROX. X ANNUAL X UNIT QUANTITY FREQUENCY COST 1. Turf Care 2. Edging i Trimming 3. Fertilization 4. Irrigation 5. Insect, Disease i Pest Control 6. Soil Aeration 7. Thatch Removal 8. Weed Control 9. Tree Maintenance 10. Baseball/Softball Field Maintenance Acres TLF • Acres M.H. Acres Acres Acres Acres , Each Each 1.6 1.5 2.2 2.2 1.6 1.6 2.2 8 52 52 4 52 12 2 1 12 4 42.959 11.103 57.831 50.00 5.774 118.536 250.597 53.410 1.765 ANNUAL COST 3574.19 866.03 508.91 2600.00 152.43 379.32 400.96 1410.02 56.48 TOTAL 9948.34 Exhibit C7 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENA►.CE, INC. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NEEDS 4 A B C 0 E f G J I J K L M CITY GOAL PROJ. NO. NO. FY89-90 ESTIMATED FY90-91 FY91-92 FY92-93 FY93-94 TOTAL TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT DESCRIPTION BY ESTIMATED PRIOR YR FUNDED UNFUNDED FUTURE FUTURE FUTURE FUTURE FY89-90 PROGRAM AREA FUNDING COSTS FY87-88 TO BUDGET BUDGET CIP CIP CIP CIP THRU SOURCES FY88-89 REQUEST REQUEST NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS FY93-94 STREET AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 16-2 85-102 Widen Highland Ave. FAU,SGT 163,696 113,688 50,008 0 50,008 SL,S 0 16-2 85-137 Overlay Valley & Ardmore FAU,SGT 558,159 3,759 554,400 0 554,400 16-2 89-141 Street Rehabilitation GF 525,000 0 125,000 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 525,000 16-1 89-142 Sidewalk Repairs * 326,000 0 326,000 0 326,000 16-1 92-143 Replace Strand Walkway GF 752,000 0 0 57,900 694,100 752,000 16-1 90-144 Replace Strand Wall GF 275,000 0 0 27,500 247,500 275,000 16-1 93-145 Utility Underground U 1,482,000 0 0 1,482,000 1,482,000 16-1 89-146 Street Median Upgrades GF,PFRT,U 146,200 0 20,000 20,000 46,200 20,000 20,000 20,000 146,200 16-1 92-147 Handicap Curbcuts SGT 100,000 0 0 100,000 100,000 16-1 89-148 Trash Enclosures Downtown P 10,000 0 10,000 0 10,000 16-1 90-149 New Bus Shelters PA 55,000 0 55,000 0 55,000 12 89-150 Misc. Traffic Signal Improv. SGT,PFRT,U 81,840 0 15,000 66,840 81,840 12 89-151 Traffic Engineering Program GR 45,500 0 45,500 0 45,500 16-1 91-165 Bikeway Path Repairs GF,SGT 91,012 14,012 0 77,000 77,000 16-2 89-170 Slurry Sealing SGT,U 450,620 120,620 320,000 10,000 330,000 16-2 88-174 Overlay Prospect SGT,U 500,000 0 0 500,000 500,000 12 86-176 Traffic Signal Pre-emption GF,SGT 58,732 25,732 33,000 0 33,000 16-2 87-177 Design Valley/Ardmore/Pier GF 40,000 0 40,000 0 40,000 STREET AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 5,660,759 277,811 1,593,908 596,840 146,200 282,400 1,161,600 1,602,000 5,382,948 PROGRAM AREA TOTALS FUND LEGEND: GF=GENERAL, SL=STREET LIGHTING, P=PARKING, SGT=STATE GAS TAX, CGT=COUNTY GAS TAX, PFRT=PARK FACILITIES REC. TAX 4UUT=4XUUT, 6UUT=6%UUT, PA=PROPOSITION "A", GR=GRANT, FAU=FEDERAL AID URBAN, S=SEWER, U=UNFUNDED * This project will be funded from the sale of three lots on 1st Street and 1st Place. Exhibit D CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NEEDS A B C D E F G J I J K L M CITY PROJECT DESCRIPTION BY GOAL PROJ. PROGRAM AREA NO. NO. 1 1 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED FY89-90 FY90-91 FY91-92 FY92-93 FY93-94 TOTAL TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PRIOR YR FUNDED UNFUNDED FUTURE FUTURE FUTURE FUTURE FY89-90 FUNDING COSTS FY87-88 TO BUDGET BUDGET CIP CIP CIP CIP THRU SOURCES FY88-89 REQUEST REQUEST NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS FY93-94 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 88-201 Street Lighting Upgrades SL,U 185,010 64,010 30,000 3,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 121,000 11 89-202 Hermosa Ave. Lighting SL 70,475 53,975 16,500 0 16,500 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AREA TOTALS STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 16-2 90-301 Miscellaneous Projects STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AREA TOTALS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 255,485 117,985 46,500 3,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 137,500 S 100,000 0 0 50,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 50,000 50,000 100,000 16-2 87-405 Target Area 3 GR,S 851,544 851,544 0 0 0 16-2 88-406 Target Area 4 GF,S 1,975,500 100,000 1,773,758 101,742 1,875,500 16-2 89-407 Sewer Bond Issue S,U 10,020,000 20,000 0 10,000,000 10,000,000 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 12,847,044 971,544 1,773,758 10,101,742 0 0 0 0 11,875,500 PROGRAM AREA TOTALS FUND LEGEND: GF=GENERAL, SL=STREET LIGHTING, P=PARKING, SGT=STATE GAS TAX, CGT=COUNTY GAS TAX, PFRT=PARK FACILITIES REC. TAX 4UUT=4%UUT, 6UUT=6%UUT, PA=PROPOSITION "A", GR=GRANT, FAU=FEDERAL AID URBAN, S=SEWER, U=UNFUNDED CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NEEDS A B C D E f G J 1 J K 1 M ESTIMATED FY89-90 FY90-91 FY91-92 FY92-93 FY93-94 TOTAL TOTAL ESTIMATED 1 1 1 1 1 CITY PROJECT DESCRIPTION BY ESTIMATED PRIOR YR FUNDED UNFUNDED FUTURE FUTURE FUTURE FUTURE FY89-90 GOAL PROJ. PROGRAM AREA FUNDING COSTS FY87-88 TO BUDGET BUDGET CIP CIP CIP CIP THRU N0. N0. SOURCES FY88-89 REQUEST REQUEST NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS FY93-94 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I PARK IMPROVEMENTS 13-2 89-506 Various Park Improv. PFRT 139,740 14,890 31,570 0 20,570 20,570 31,570 20,570 124,850 13-2 88-508 Park Irrigation PFRT,U 212,010 47,010 55,000 55,000 55,000 165,000 13-2 89-509 Tennis Court Resurfacing PFRT,U 59,400 0 0 19,800 19,800 19,800 59,400 13-2 90-510 Implement Park Master Plan PFRT 200,000 0 0 200,000 200,000 19-3 91-511 RRROW Parking Lot PFRT 126,500 0 0 126,500 126,500 13-2 89-512 Basketball Courts GR 60,000 0 60,000 0 60,000 8-1 89-513 Purch. Lots 8 Edith Rodaway Pk U 250,000 0 0 250,000 250,000 8-1 89-514 Purchase ATSF RR right-of-way U 7,500,000 0 6,000,000 0 1,500,000 7,500,000 8-1 89-515 Purchase S. School Propertli U 2,000,000 0 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 PARK IMPROVEMENTS 10,547,650 61,900 6,146,570 2,324,800 1,921,870 40,370 31,570 20,570 10,485,750 PROGRAM AREA TOTALS FUND LEGEND: GF=GENERAL, SL=STREET LIGHTING, P=PARKING, SGT=STATE GAS TAX, CGT=COUNTY GAS TAX, PFRT=PARK FACILITIES REC. TAX 4UUT=4XUUT, 6WT=6XUUT, PA=PROPOSITION "A", GR=GRANT, FAU=FEDERAL AID URBAN, S=SEWER, U=UNFUNDED CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NEEDS A B C D E F G J I J K L M ESTIMATED FY89-90 FY90-91 FY91-92 FY92-93 FY93-94 TOTAL TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY PROJECT DESCRIPTION BY ESTIMATED PRIOR YR FUNDED UNFUNDED FUTURE FUTURE FUTURE FUTURE FY89-90 GOAL PROJ. PROGRAM AREA FUNDING COSTS FY87-88 TO BUDGET BUDGET CIP CIP CIP CIP THRU NO. NO. SOURCES FY88-89 REQUEST REQUEST NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS FY93-94 I I I I I I I I I I I BUILDINGS & GROUNDS IMPROVEMENTS 16-1 89-601 Fuel Tanks GF,U 159,573 17,073 4,000 122,500 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 142,500 16-1 93-603 Cushman Facility P 50,000 0 0 50,000 50,000 16-1 89-604 Various Building Improv. GF,U 174,920 71,520 16,000 22,500 15,400 22,000 0 27,500 103,400 16-1 91-608 Public Works Yard U 1,502,500 0. 0 50,000 105,000 1,347,500 1,502,500 16-1 89-609 City Hall Expansion GF,U * 2,000,000 0 30,000 141,000 1,829,000 2,000,000 16-1 89-611 Community Center Improv. GF,U 150,000 0 0 150,000 150,000 16-1 89-612 City Wide Signs GF,U 22,000 2,000 8,000 12,000 20,000 16-1 89-613 Comm. Ctr. Elect. Upgrade GF,U 90,200 0 8,000 82,200 90,200 16-2 89-614 Pier Repairs GF,GR,U 361,692 161,492 0 95,700 104,500 200,200 16-1 89-615 Comm. Ctr. Fire Alarm Sys. GF,U 48,400 0 12,000 36,400 48,400 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AREA TOTALS GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 4,559,285 252,085 78,000 562,300 2,057,900 1,373,500 4,000 231,500 4,307,200 11 89-701 City Parking Lot Improvements P 20,000 0 5,000 0 15,000 20,000 11 89-703 Emergency Preparedness Trailer GF,U 22,000 0 5,000 17,000 22,000 GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AREA TOTALS 42,000 0 10,000 17,000 15,000 0 0 0 42,000 FUND LEGEND: GF=GENERAL, SL=STREET LIGHTING, P=PARKING, SGT=STATE GAS TAX, CGT=COUNTY GAS TAX, PFRT=PARK FACILITIES REC. TAX 4UUT=4XUUT, 6UUT=6%UUT, PA=PROPOSITION "A", GR=GRANT, FAU=FEDERAL AID URBAN, S=SEWER, U=UNFUNDED * Per Council suggestion of 5/22/89 replacement of Council Chamber chairs for approximately 85,000 is included in the 830,000. /L1/ c:7-r77G� :sstf ( cl-°"r'<1 64 w. A.T. C . H . D . 0 . G „, chwit Henfteenteea•/ June 12, 1989 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL RE: PUBLIC HEARING, AGENDA ITEM NO. 6, JUNE 13, 1989 COUNCIL MEETING Ladies and Gentlemen: This letter is submitted in opposition to your consideration of CIP No. 91-511 as part of the Five Year Capital Improvement Projects Program: 1. harsh contrast 2. not within the residents. The proposed parking lot would present a to the natural surroundings. A paved parking lot on the Greenbelt is realm of expectations of Hermosa Beach 3. A grass roots people's initiative for the purpose of preserving the historic condition and use of the Greenbelt was circulated by WATCHDOG (We Are the Citizens of Hermosa, Democracy Our Goal). 2,106 signatures have been filed with the City Clerk and it is apparent that the measure will be on the November 1989 ballot. Therefore, CIP No. 91-511 is premature and a waste of our City's funds and Council's time. It is in direct contravention with the very essence of the people's initiative. Section 3 of the initiative ordinance specifically states that this property shall never be used for, amongst other things, paved parking. WATCHDOG hopes that consideration will be given to the deletion of CIP No. 91-511 from your resolution. LRz MARY ANUE BOYLE p'.o. box 144• hermosa beach, ca 90254:' a. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION May 30, 1989 Honorable Mayor City Council meeting and Members of City Council of June 13, 1989 RESULTS OF SALE OF SURPLUS LOTS AT PUBLIC AUCTION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the city council authorize the mayor to sign any documents necessary to complete the sale of the surplus lots located at 634 1st Street, 705 1st Street and 704 1st Place. BACKGROUND The city council authorized the sale of the surplus lots via a public auction at the regularly scheduled meeting of April 11, 1989. ANALYSIS A public auction, conducted by Anderson -Ryan Realty Company, was held on May 18, 1989 in the city council chambers at city hall. The high bids for the surplus lots were as follows: 634 1st Street - $402,000.00 705 1st Street - $351,000.00 704 1st Place - $331,000.00 All three bids were in excess of the minimum established price of $320,000.00 per lot. Concur: fevin B. Northcraft City Manager Respectfully submitted, William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety • r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin B. Northcraft, Plannin• Director FROM: Michael Schubach, P1:. i,_Q ctor SUBJECT: Activity Ctrart DATE: June 6, 1989 The time frames and priority of activities noted on the attached chart were based on the following criteria: 1. Ease at which project could be completed. 2. Intuitive sense of urgency. 3. City Council request for immediate action. 4. State law requirements. 5. Complexity of issue. 6. Eminence of project completion. The following notes which criteron was used to schedule upcoming projects: The numbers shown on the attached chart and the numbers noted above correspond with the numbers shown below. Project No. Criteria Project No. Criteria 1 6 10 6 2 6 11 4 3 1 12 5 4 2, 3, 6 13 2, 3 5 3 14 2, 3 6 1, 6 15 3 7 5 16 5 8 5 17 4 9 2 1 Use of Consultants Using consultants for completion of upcoming planning projects generally will be costly and will not produce the expected results. Further, large amounts of staff time will still be necessary to review and critique the draft documents, and also to meet with the consultants. The current staff in most instances has the expertise to accom- plish the upcoming tasks, and is more able to "fine tune" the documents to the Citys needs. .Consultants generally provide "generic" products which have been prepared over and over again for other Cities. Based on past experiences, the, current ex- perience with the Circulation Element is a good example of norm rather than the unusual. ` The element is significantly behind schedule as a result of staff discovering numerous errors, and the consultant having to redo many segments -of the draft docu- ment. The document has been sent back to the consultant twice. Once the element is completed, staff's opinion is that on a scale of 1 to 10, the finished product will still only rate a 7. For the $75,000 and the 2 years it has taken to complete the Cir- culation Element, staff estimates that most of the General Plan could have been revised. Unless the City either does not have the time and/or the exper- tise to do the work, consultants should not be hired, and in some cases, the staff may not have either the expertise, or the time to accomplish the task. In those instances, staff would recom- mend hiring a consultant. Staff estimates that if consultants were hired to revise the General Plan, based on the cost of doing the Circulation Element, it would cost $250,000 to revise the other six elements. Of course, if the other upcoming projects were included, the cost would be even higher. Also, the $250,000 does not include the cost of the City's staff time for preparing the Request For Pro- posals, interviewing the consultants, and ultimately critiquing the draft products. The total cost of the Circulation Element including the City's staff time is probably $90,000. Recommendation f /111 y(r Appropriate $50,000 to be placed in the Planning Department's budget for consultant services to be utilized if and when they may be needed. REVIEWED: evin B. Northclraft City Manager CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Use of con- sultants can be frustrating, but there are also times when their assistance is invaluable. Given that our recent hirings will put us at full staffing for the first time in a long while, I recommend we review our progress at mid -year and reconsider consultants then if a need gxists. Project - • 1989. 1990 June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov.Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May 1. Video sales C-1 & C-2 zones . 2. Task force, Biltmore Site • 3. Gym in C-2 zones 4. Nonconforming uses/ structures 5. MUC zone changes 6. General Plan/zone change for consistency 7. Circulation element 8. Height measurement 9. 17' setback special study 10. Height of fences & hedges 11. Oil drill EIR 12. Mandated housing element revision 13. Design Review Board 14. Gen; P1. revisions (Incl. Housing Element) 15. Residential zoning stand- ards (after Housing.Ele_' meet) 16. Residential density reduction 17. requitement°wn parking 18. Applicant submit.requests completed completed •• dal UNSCHEDULED . �l - 1- 7- P STUDIES Open Space permitted use list Adult uses - movies, vidoes, newsracks, massage parlo.rs,.etc. Landscaping in 'R' Zones Residential use of Public Right-of-ways Restaurant expansion without required parking Definition of assembly.. Application fees Property maintenance Development fees Amortize all businesses requiring Conditional Use Permits Grading of lots Precise Plan development and Environmental assessment for exempt projects Policy statement, lot coverage. HONORABLE.MAYOR and MEMBERS OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL June 6, 1989 Regular Meeting of June 13, 1989 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PROPOSITION A INCENTIVE FUND APPLICATION FOR THE "WAVE" DIAL -RIDE -RIDE PROGRAM INITIATED BY: HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached Resolution 89- endorsing an application for FY 89-90 Proposition A Subregional Incentive Funds for the Hermosa/Redondo joint Dial -a -Ride program known as the "WAVE." BACKGROUND The Cities of Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach jointly sponsor a demand response, curb to curb, Dial -a -Ride Program known as the "WAVE." Service of the "WAVE" commenced on February 2, 1987. According to Los Angeles Transportation Commission Proposition A Guidelines, this joint effort between Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach makes Hermosa eligible to receive Subregional Incentive Funds. Incentive funds are made available out of Proposition A Discretionary funds. As a condition of approval of these funds, the City Council must approve this application. The proposed Resolution fulfills this requirement. ANALYSIS Redondo Beach staff is submitting an application for Proposition A Incentive Funds under the category of Subregional Grants. According to LACTC Proposition A Guidelines, projects approved under this category will be funded at 20% of the system's total operating budget for the first year and, in the second and third years, between 10% to 25% based on attainment of the performance standards outlined by LACTC. The Fiscal Year 89-90 will be the third year of operation for the "WAVE" Dial -a -Ride program. The amount of subregional funding available to Hermosa Beach for the Fiscal Year of 89-90 (based on performance funding of 14% of the total operating cost of the program) will be $19,053. 1 1 h ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 89- 2. Subregional Application for the "WAVE" Dial -a -Ride Res•ectfully Submitted Concur: _ _ An•rea N. An•erson .Planning Aide Michael Schubach Planning Director evin B. Northcr ft City Manager 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF.REDONDO BEACH FOR FY 1989-90 PROPOSITION A DISCRETIONARY FUNDS UNDER THE SUBREGIONAL PARATRANSIT INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR THE "WAVE" DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM. . WHEREAS, the City Council of tbe City of Hermosa Beach, California held a meeting on this matter and made •the.fol.lowing findings: A. The City of Hermosa Beach receives Proposition A Local Return Funds to operate local transit programs. B. The Cities of Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach operate the "WAVE" Dial -A -Ride demand response service for the general public, senior citizens and disabled; C. The Cities of Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach have been operating this joint venture Dial -A -Ride since February 2, 1987 and have executed an Agreement to continue service until FY 1989-90; D. Fare revenues and local support, as required under the Los Angeles Transportation Commission's Transit Performance Measurement Program, must amount to a minimum of 33 1/3 percent of the proposed program's total operating cost; E. The City of Redondo Beach is applying for funds under the Subregional Paratransit Incentive Program not to exceed 25% of the non -formula funds in its FY 1989-90 proposed Hermosa/Redondo Dial -A -Ride operating budget inconformance with tbe guidelines of Los Angeles County Transportation Commission; F. The responsibility for any resulting shortfalls in fare 3 1' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 revenues, local contributions, or program revenues will be shared proportionately by both cities; . NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby resolve as follows: • 1. That the city support the filing of an application by the •City•of•Redondo Beach for FY 1989-90 Proposition A Discretionary funds under the Subregional Paratransit Incentive Program not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the .FY 1989-90'proposed Hermosa/Redondo Dial -A -Ride budget. FINALLY RESOLVED, that the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, shall enter the same in the Book of Resolutions of said City and shall cause the action of the Mayor and City Council in adopting the same to be entered in the official minutes of said City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1989. day of PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: T/ccrsA CITY CLERK ��, CITY ATTORNEY ;3 HOUSING, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND TRANSIT April 13, 1989 Mr. Richard DeRock LACTC 403 West Eighth Street Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Dear Richard: WNIIii MANIA 415 DIAMOND STREET P.O. BOX 270 REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277-0270 TELEPHONE • (213) 372-1171 The cities of Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach respectfully submit our 89-90 Subregional Grant Application. We are requesting $89,200 incentive grant to cover the cost of the WAVE operation. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 372-1171, extension 2453. Sincerely, (lmal Cara Rice Transit Manager Enclosure SECTION 1. GENERAL APPLICANT INFORMATION PAGE 1 OF 2 PART ONE • 1. Applicant: CITY OF REDONDO BEACH 2. Principal Contact Person: Title: Phone Number: 3. Date: 4. Type of Incentive Project 5. Estimated Duration of. Project: 6. Amount of Incentive Program Funds Requested: PART TWO • CARA RICE TRANSIT MANAGER (n3) 372-1171 Ext. 245,3 April 3, 1989 Subregional July 1, 1989 - June 30, 1990 $89,220 7. Participating City(ies), Transit Operator(s), or Los Angeles County: City of Redondo Beach 8. Geographical Area of Service: 7.3 sq. miles 9. Start-up Date of FY 1988-89 Services: July 1. 1988 10. Service Parameters o Days and Hours of Transportation Services: 6 AM -12 midnight Seniors and disabled 7 days a week; General public: 7Am-7PM weekdays only o Eligibility Restrictions: None o Transfer/coordination arrangements with contiguous systems (fixed -route and demand -responsive) Gardena, RTD, Torrance SECTION 1. General Applicant Information PAGE 2 OF 2 11. Service Provider Check Box(es) o Operated directly by applicant o Service contracted Lai 12. Service Accesibility - Describe how the service• is .accessible to the disabled. Vans are lift-equipoed. SECTION 2. INCENTIVE PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION (To be completed for all Incentive project categories) Goals and Objectives - No change System Description - No Change Administration and Monitoring - Change as noted As a direct result of Commission changes to the Incentive Program Guidelines, the WAVE is ineligible for incentive grant funds if formula subsidies are used for the same program. LACTC staff assisted City staff to divide the program administratively,in order to comply with the change in the guidelines so that the WAVE could continue to receive both formula and incentive funds. Service under the formula funds allocation will be based on the deployment of 2 vehicles. Service under the Incentive Grant Program includes the deployment of 3 vehicles. The City will collect and report separate Section 15 data in order to comply with both programs. The change in the incentive program guidelines "restricting municipal operators from using formula and incentive funds on the same project", places an unnecessary burden on City staff since program costs and Section 15 data must be collected and recorded separately. The administrative change will not affect the WAVE riders at all. The system division will occur July 1, 1989. >Marketing Program - No change Coordination and Consolidation - No Change FY 89-90 IGP>LTR$>CARA*>PROPOSEDFY90SERVICE CHANGES a_61 ww J. Project Name: LACTC INCENTIVE PROGRAM APPLICATION FY 1989-90 RIDERSHIP AND OPERATING DATA HERMOSA-REDONDO WAVE SERVICES SUPPLIED AUDITED• FY 1987-88 CURRENT• FY 1988-89 PROPOSED 'FY 1989-90 TABLE 2 PLANNED FY 1990-91 01. Number of vehicles in operation 8 5 3 3 02. Total vehicle miles 232,261 232,261 03. Total vehicle hours 16,500 16,500 139,357. 04. Total vehicle revenue miles 209,626 05. Total vehicle revenue hours 16,191 209,625 06. Base fare • 1.00 16,191 • SERVICE CONSUMED 07. Unlinked passenger trips SERVICE PERSONNEL 1.00 9,900 139,357 125,774 9,715 1.00 9,900 125,714 9;715 1.00 158,000 158,000 134,800 I 34,800 08. Administrators 2 09. Full time vehicle operators 1 2 2 2 1 1 10. Part time vehicle operators 11 11 10 10 11. Dispatchers/supervisors 3 2 1.8 12. Ticket stubs/fare collectors 0 0 0 1.8 0 13. Information operators 0 0 14. Security Personnel 15. Total service personnel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL VEHICLES AVAILABLE FOR SERVICE 0 0 0 16. Automobiles 17. Non -modified vans 18. Small buses (Less than 25 seats) 19. Medium buses (25 - 35 seats) 20. Large buses (More than 35 seats) ' If Aoolicable January 1989 Incentive Program 4 4 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 • Project Name: LACTC INCENTIVE PROGRAM APPLICATION FY 1989-90 FINANCIAL DATA HERMOSA-REDONDO WAVE OPERATING EXPENSES 21. Vehicle operations 22. Vehicle maintenance 23. Non vehicle maintenance 24. General administration 25. Total operating expense (Non -capital); CAPITAL EXPENSES (Greater than 55000) 26. Vehicle purchases 27. Vehicle rental & leases AUDITED* FY 1987-88 387,447 86,605 100,378 574,430 0 0 CURRENT* FY 1988-89 398,514 89,220 107,064 594,798 0 0 TABLE 3 PROPOSED PLANNED FY 1989-90 FY 1990-91 • 239,109 I 239',109. 53.,532 53,532 64,238 j 64,238 356,819 28. Other major capital (Describe) 29. Total major capital 0 0 OPERATING REVENUES 0 0 0 0 0 0 356,819 0 0 0 30. Total farebox revenues 31. Prop A Local Return (All Sources) 32. Incentive funds 33. Other Prop A 34. State transit operating funds 35. Federal transit operating funds 36. Other funds (Identify 37. Total operating revenues CAPITAL REVENUES 38. Prop A Local Return 39. Other Prop A 34,575 35,000 357,781 407,058 98,020 85,740 22,054 27,000 62,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 574,430 594,798 21,000 21,000 246,659 279.000 89,220 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 356.879 1400.000 i 0 0 40. State transit funds (Identify 41. Other funds (identify 42. Total capital revenues 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 i *If applicable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 June 1, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City Council Meeting of June 13, 1989 AWARD OF BID FOR PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission the City Council: Authorize the Mayor to sign the attached Agreement with Purkiss Rose, for the development of a Master Plan for Parks and Recreation, in an amount not to exceed $33,978; waive any irregularities with regard to late submissions; appropriate $8,978 for 1989-90 from Prospective Expenditures into the Dept. of Community Resources; authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within budget limitations. BACKGROUND On December 13, 1988 the City Council approved the concept of developing a Master Plan for Parks & Recreation at an estimated cost of $25,000 and authorized staff to issue a Request for Proposals. On February 2, 1989 the RFP was sent to 16 firms. Of those 16 firms, 9 responded with a proposal, two of which were submitted within two hours after the scheduled deadline. ANALYSIS Three of the nine submissions were not within budget feasibility and therefore were not considered. They were RJM Design at $69,800; Randolph Hlubik at $62,275; and POD at $54,850. While each of these firms was way over the estimated budget, it was felt they could all do an excellent job for the City. However in reviewing the other firms it was felt one of those other firms could do as good a job for less cost. The firm of Harris & Associates at $38,300 is an excellent landscaping firm that designed Rodaway Park in Hermosa. However the recreation element that is critical to the Master Plan was not addressed to the degree that is needed by the City. Cardoza-DiLallo Harrington at $33,900 appeared overly dependent on City staff. And in addition to their base bid there are additional costs for sub -consultants and direct program expenses. The Heimberger/Hirsch proposal at $14,565 was the lowest proposal submitted. In reviewing the document it was apparent the end product, the Master Plan, would not contain the information that 1m the City is hoping to gain from this study. Therefore the proposal was not considered. The Commission then interviewed the final three firms: EPT/ERA $41,500 Purkiss Rose $32,360 (incl printing costs of $3000) Recreation Systems, Inc. $22,400 Two of these three firms submitted their proposals within two hours after the deadline. Staff was advised by the then City Attorney, the proposals could be considered and if one of those two were chosen, that Council could waive this irregularity. EPT/ERA This is an excellent firm that would provide the City with an good report. The cost of the services was a factor in not recommending this firm. And upon interviewing the other two finalist firms, it was determined one of the other two could still provide the same kind of excellent work for less cost. PURRISS ROSE This firm is being recommended to the City Council for two main reasons; their methodology and the recreation personnel who will be working on this project. While the cost is $9,360 above the estimated budget, it is felt by the Commission and staff that this firm will provide the City with a ten year plan that is very comprehensive and will be a useful tool in the development of our parks and recreation programs. RECREATION SYSTEMS, INC. This is the only firm that was within the estimated budget that it was felt could do an adequate job. However, this firm is not being recommended as it is felt they will not produce an end product that will be detailed enough for the City's purposes. BUDGET The recommended budget is: Contract Services Printing Costs 5% Contingency $29,360 3,000 1,618 Total contract amount $33,978 Initially the City Council appropriated $25,000 for this study. This figure was based on estimates received by staff through various professional contacts. Before you this evening is the request for an additional appropriation of $8,978 which will cover the total cost of the project. SUMMARY As the City Council has noted by now, the recommendation is not to the lowest proposal. It is the third lowest proposal with the reasons delineated above. Cost is only one factor in evaluating proposals for professional services. The Master Plan for Parks & Recreation will be a valuable tool for the intelligent development of our parks and recreation programs. The firm we are recommending has shown particular sensitivity to the uniqueness of the community. They recognize the need for a plan that identifies resident population needs while taking into consideration impact of the visitor population. They understand the need to develop a consensus for understanding and direction from all groups and individuals. The Commission and staff feel the firm of Purkiss Rose will provide to the City the balanced, detailed plan that the City needs and will be able to use for the next decade. Concur: Kevin B. Northbraft City Manager Respectfully submitted, Alana Mastrian-Handman Director Dept. of Community Resources Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copela d Finance Administrator CITY MANAGER COMMENT: Prior to signing agreement, the work plan is to be clarified with consultant to assure that the master plan will be formatted for inclusion in the City's general plan. 1 :1: E' AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS :1 /A /)oc ioneitt l:' 7 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect for .Special Services 1988 EDITION THIS DOCUMENT IMS LUPORMNT LEGAL. CONSEQUENCES: S: CONSUL7i1TION WITI/ AN A71i)RN1;Y IS ENCOURAGED WITI/ RESPECT 7r) /7:ti CO. /'/./ 'I'1ON 01? AIODIli/CAT/ON. AGREEMENT made as of the nineteenth Mr:vtten !1.::Id • ••I:J eighty—nine BETWEEN the Owner: (.\iaaa am/ trddrrxs) and the Architect: l.\' • uurl address) day of May in the year of City of Hermosa Beach 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Purkiss—Rose 733 E. Chapman Avenue Fullerton, CA 92631 For the following Project: r/mrlud, detailed dest'ripl/urr u/ ',rake). /uui ,u. address and siupr.l Comprehensive Master Plan for Parks & Recreation The Owner and the Architect agree as set Ibrth below. :4 11) N)—. 19'9. (<)I9NN Ira• •1'ba• Aim:mu. low if :1•ibiail:. 1'ii New lick ,%%eI1 ta. N.V.'.\\:Istliaigt.rn. I)( Z4u1116. Iti *r.taluiliatit ul Ilse material Ii rriu .0 .uh.Iatncd qui sun. nt ul its pr. visiuu. wadi( HA written perlllissiUlt .11 ilk. MA ra)l:ua•s 1hr tIIi' •*1 1IU 1'1ilral iIIItS ,teal w11i ha• auhjr.'I :.. Iry;.d WI stiuu.ut AIA DOCUMENT 0727 • $\\NER•AIt1:111111.1 .\t.K1a.%IIA1 • Poo, 1'.UI'1'Itl\ • .\L\' • l' • 1111' 0111ilt:AV •1Keul'I'v(T% I'a'' NI•\\ 11 Ott: UNIT, X\C'. •A\sIl1N ;'t• I :It. B727-1988 1 ARTICLE 1 ARCHITECT'S SERVICES (Here list those services to be provided by the Architect under the Terms and Conditions of Ibis Agreement. Note under each service listed the method and means of compensation to he used, (f applicable as provided in Article N.) ARCHITECTS RESPONSIBILITIES 1.1 ARCHITECT'S SERVICES 1.1.1 The Architect's services consist of those services performed by the Architect, Architect's employees and Architect's consultants as enumerated below and any other services included in Article 9.0. 1.1.2 The Architect's services shall be performed as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Work. ARTICLE 2 SCOPE OF ARCHITECT'S BASIC SERVICES 2.1 DEFINITION 2.1.1. The Architect's Basic Services consist of those described under the phases identified below, and any other services identified in Article 9.0. 2.2 Development of Interim Report 2.2.1. The architect shall develop a credible data base and thorough analysis that will support any policy statement. 2.2.2. Task & procedures that are to be included within this phase include: project definition, research, fact finding, demand analysis (public survey, synergy workshops), statement of needs, draft policy statement. 2.3 Implementation Phase 2.3.1 The Architect shall develop a Comprehensive Master Plan for parks and recreation that is based on citizen needs and is realistic and implementable. 2.3.2. Task& procedures that are to be incorporated within this phase include: physical development of sites, cost estimates, organization management of the department, funding methods, preliminary environmental investigation, recommended development projects, priority program and draft plan. 2.3.3. Once the draft plan has been reviewed and approved the final Master Plan will be submitted. 3.1 ARTICLE 3 ADDITION_ SERVICES Additional services shall.be provided..if.authorized or confirm:Lin writing by.the owner, and shall;be paid. for by theowner as.provided in..this agreement. AIA DOCUMENT 8727 • owNlili:AK/:IIITE.0 A(.KlilimINT • 19$N liI)ITI/)N • AIA' • ...Pow • TIM AMERICAN INsTI 1'1.1' / )I' A144'1111 1 -31N. ris NTNG' VI MK AVEN1'1i. NW. \IIIN .fl I' . 1)4. /mum. 8727-1988 2 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ARCHITECT ARTICLE 2 OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 The Owner steal provide full information regarding requirements for the Project. The Owner shall furnish required information as expeditiously as necessary for the orderly progress of the Work, and the Architect shall he enti- tled to rely on the accuracy and completeness thereof. 2.2 The Owner shall designate a representative authorized to act on the Owner's behalf with respect to the Project. The Owner or such authorized representative shall render dcci• cions in a timely manner pertaining to documents submitted by the Architect in order to avoid unreasonable delay in the orderly .and sequential progress of the Architect's services. ARTICLE 3 USE OF ARCHITECT'S DOCUMENTS 3.1 The documents prepared by the Architect for this Proj- ect are instruments of the Architect's service for use solely with respect to this Project and, unless otherwise provided, the Architect shall be deemed the author of these documents and shall retain all common law, statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright. The Owner shall be permit - to.: to retain copies. including reproducible copies, of the Architect's documents lir the Owners information, reference and use in connection with the Project. The Architect's docu- ments shall not be used by the Owner or others on other proj- ects, for additions to this Project or for completion of this Project by others, unless the Architect is adjudged to be in default under this Agreement, except by agreement in writing and with appropriate compensation to the Architect. ARTICLE 4 ARBITRATION 4.1 Claims. disputes or other matters in question between the parties to this Agreement arising out of or relating to this Agreement or breach thereof shall he subject to and decided by arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association cur- rently in effect unless Me parties mutually agree otherwise. 4.2 A demand for arbitration shall he made within a reason- able time after the claim. dispute or other matter in question has arisen. In 00 event shall the demand 1.►1. arbitration be nude after the date when institution (Illegal or equitable pro- ceedings basked on such claim. dispute or other matter in ques- tion would be barred by the'applicable statutes of Iimitalitins. 4.3 No arhitrai in arising tan of or relating to this Agreement shall include. by consolidation. joinder or in any oilier man - ;111 :Iddiliollal person or entity tut a party to this Agree- ment. except by written consent containing a specific refer• circ to this Agreement signed by the Owner. Architect and any other person or entity sought to he joined Ci ltsenl to arbitration involving an additional person in. entity shall nun r' institute consent 11►arhitrani Iof:u►yclaim. dispute ser.inter mater in :iucattun not described 1c the written consent or with a person ;)r entity not named of described therein The foregoing agreement to arbitrate and other agreements to arbi- trate with an additional person Or entity duly consented to by the parties to this Agreement shall he specifically enforce - :dile in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 4.4 The award rendered by the arbitrator or arbitrators shall be final, and judgment may be entered upon it in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. ARTICLE 5 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION 5.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon not less than seven days' written notice should the other party fail substantially to perforin in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the party initiating the termination. 5.2 lithe Owner fails to make payment when due the Archi- tect for services and expenses, the Architect may, upon seven days' written notice to the Owner, suspend performance of services under this Agreement. Unless payment in full is received by the Architect within seven days of the date of the notice, the ::aspension shall take effect without further notice. In the event of a suspension of services, the Architect shall have nu liability to the Owner for delay or damage caused the Owner because of such suspension of services. 5.3 In the event of termination not the fault of the Architect, the Architect shall be compensated lir services performed prior to termination, together with Reimbursable Expenses then due and all 'termination Expenses as defined in Paragraph 5.4. 5.4 Termination Expes'ses :hall he computed as a percentage of the compensation earned to the time of termination, as follows: .1 For services provided on the basis of a multiple of Direct Personnel Expense. ?t) percent of the total Direct Personnel Expense incurred to the time of ter- mination; and .2 For services provided on die basis of a stipulated sum, Ill percent of the stipulated sunt earned to the time of termination. ARTICLE 6 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 6.1 reties% otherwise provided. this Agreement shall he got•- erned by the law of the principal place of business of the Architect. 6.2 Causes of action he(ween the parties a► this Agreement pertaining to acts or failures to act shall he deemed to have accrued and the applicable statute of limitations shall com- mence to run not later than the date payment is due the Archi- tect pursuant to Paragraph H.-1. AIA DOCUMENT D727 • t►tt'ss:HM44:Ilrl•nt:'I At.10:I'M NT • I'»sx I'I>I'I'It►N • AIA' • -Ivo: •.. %MI lit AN IN'Irit 1E. )1, tit.:111111 I. 1-4i NEW V4 INK wi':I'P NW. W IIIK. lit . t►t .9/111$11 B727-1988 3 6.3 The Owner and Architect, respectively, bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, suc- cessors, assigns and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants of this Agreement. Neither Owner nor Architect shall assign this Agreement without the written consent of the other. 6.4 This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agree- ment between the Owner and Architect and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either writ- ten or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by writ- ten instrument signed by both Owner and Architect. 6.5 Nothing contained in chis Agreement shall create a con- tractual relationship with ora cause of action in favor of a third party against either the Owner or Architect. 6.6 Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, the Archi- tect and Architect's consultants shall have no responsibility for the discovery, presence, handling, removal or disposal of or exposure of persons to hazardous materials in any form at the Project site, including but not limited to asbestos, asbestos products, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCD) or other toxic substances. ARTICLE 7 PAYMENTS TO THE ARCHITECT 7.1 DIRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSE 7.1.1 Direct Personnel Expense is defined as the direct salaries of the Architect's personnel engaged on the Project and the portion of :tic cosi of their mandatory and customary con- tributions and benefits related thereto, such as employment taxes and other statutory employee benefits, insurance, sick leave, holidays, vacations, pensions, and similar contributions and benefits. 7.2 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 7.2.1 Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to the Architect's compensation and include expenses incurred by the Archi- tect and Architect's employees and consultants in the interest of the Project for .1 expense 01 transportation and living expenses in con- nection with out-of-town travel authorized by the Owner; .2 long-distance communications; .3 fees paid fox securing approval of authorities hav- ing jurisdiction over the Project: .4 reproductions; .5 postage and handling of documents, .6 expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates, if authorized by the Owner; .7 renderings and models requested by the Owner; .8 expense of additional coverage or limits, including professional liability insurance, requested by the Owner in excess of that normally carried by the Architect and the Architect's consultants; and .9 Expense of computer-aided design and drafting equipment time when used in connection with the Project. 7.3 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF THE ARCHITECT'S SERVICES 7.3.1 Payments on account of the Architect's services and for Reimbursable Expenses shall be made monthly upon presen- tation of the Architect's sutement of services rendered or as otherwise provided in this Agreement. 7.3.2 An initial payment as set forth in Paragraph 8.1 is the minimum payment under this .!greemcni 7.4 ARCHITECT'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS 7.4.1 Records of Reimbursable Expenses and expenses per- taining to services performed on the basis of a multiple of Direct Personnel Expense shall be available to the Owner or the Owner's authorized representative at mutually convenient times. ARTICLE 8 BASIS OF COMPENSATION The Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: 8.1 AN INITIAL PAYMENT OF Dollars (1 ) shall be made upon execution of this Agreement and credited to the Owner's account at final payment. 8.2 COMPENSATION FOR THE ARCHITECT'S SERVICES, as described in Article I, Architect's Services, shall be computed as follows: (Insert basis 0/cnm/h'nsutinn. including stipulated sums, multiples tar percentages. and identify the services w u b/tb particular metbods of compensation apply, i/ necessary) Phase 1: Phase 2: Interim Report Final Master Plan •$18,490 $10,870 $29,360 .Progressive Invoices to be billed monthly based on percent calplete. 4 B727-1988 AIA DOCUMENT 8727 • t1Vi'NI:K•AKI'Iunix AI.RFF%IIiN'r • ('1.4t4 I:I11'1111N • .AIA' • 'c'19$14 • TI IF 1 %IFiIk'AN INN"' rri'TF t1F AKt:1111 l'1'TS. ri= NI 1% (KK NUN''Ii. N Vi:%, IIINt :F1 IN. 111' �IUKN. 8.3 FOR REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES, as described in Article 7, and any other Items Included in Article 9 as Reimbursable Ex- penses, a multiple of 1.15 (15% ) times the expenses incurred by the Architect, the Architect's employees and consultants In the interest of the Project. 8.4 Payments are due and payable Net 30 ( 30 ) clays from the date of the Architect's invoice. Amounts unpaid over 30 ( 30 ) days after the invoice date shall bear Interest at the rate entered below, or In the absence thereof, at the legal rate prevailing from time to time at the principal place of business of the Architect. (Insert raw of Interest agreed upon.) 1 t -z% monthly (Usury laws and requirements under the Federal 7hutb in Lending Act, similar state and local consumer credit laws and other regulations at the Owner's and Ancbfect's principal places of business, the location o/ the Project and elsewhere may affect the validity of this provision. Specific legal advice sbouid be obtained w tb respect so deletions or modifications, and also regarding other requirements such as written disclosures or waivers.) 8.5 IF THE SCOPE of the Project or of the Architect's services is changed materially, the amounts of compensation shall be equitably adjusted. ARTICLE S OTHER CONDITIONS .Refer to addendum A & addendum B attached .Reproduction allowance of $3,000 to $5,000 to be billed as accrued. .Fee proposed includes 6 Task Force Workshops, 2 Public Hearings, 2 Commission/Council meetings, and 10 Staff Meetings. Additional workshops, meetings, or hearings will be billed at the Purkiss-Rose hourly rates: PRINCIPAL $75.00 PROJECT MANAGER $48.00 PROJECT CAPTAIN $42.00 DRAFTSMAN $36.00 CLERICAL AND IBRD PROCESSING STAFF $27.00 This Agreement entered Into as of the day and year first written above. OWNER ARCHITECT (Signature) (Signature) (Printed name and tide) • (nted name and title) Stephan D. Rose/Owner/Landscape Architect MA DOCUMENT 8727 • OWNEK•AKC.I IITEC.T AGREEMENT • W M WE lION • AIA • 1 wstt • TIIE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS. 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE. NA'.. WASHINGTON. D.C. 20006 B727-1988 5 ADDENDUM A In this contract, all references to Architect mean Landscape Architect. ARTICLE 1 Architect's Basic services are as described in Addendum "8" proposal to .include norma.1 .Landscape Architectural Services in more detail. ARTICLE 4 Arbitration is deleted in its entirety. THE FOLLOWING CLAUSES ARE ADDED TO THIS CONTRACT: INDEMNIFICATION Architect shall indemnify, defend and hold Owner harmless from any and all claims, liabilities, and causes of action for injury to or death of any person. or for damage to or destruction of property resulting from any negligent act of Architect. LIMITED WARRANTY Consultant warrants that it shall perform the services in accordance with the standards of care and diligence normally practiced by recognized consulting firms in performing services of similar nature. If, during the six (6) month period following completion of the services it is shown that Consultant has failed to fulfill this warranty, and Owner has promptly notified Consultant in writing of any such failure, Consultant shall perform, at Consultant's cost, such revisions and other corrective services within the original scope of work as may be necessary to remedy such failure. Neither party shall be responsible or held liable to the other for consequential damages including loss of profit, loss of investment, loss of business oppor— tunity, loss of use or product, or business interruption. The obligations and remedies provided herein are exclu— sive and in lieu of any other rights or remedies available at law or in equity. Indemnifications, releases from liability, and limitations of liability shall apply not— withstanding the fault, strict liability or negligence of the party indemnified, released or whose liability is limited. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: June 12, 1989 RE: Master Plan/Parks & RecreationFROM: Alana Mastrian-Handma ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** I have been asked for more information regarding Agenda Item 1M Award of Bid for the Parks & Recreation Master Plan. Attached you will find the proposal submitted by Purkiss-Rose which reflects the work that is to be done. The question has been asked, . . . "what will the end product contain? What information will I be able to find in that end product?" The final Master Plan will be a guideline for the development of parks and recreation programs and facilities in Hermosa Beach. Some examples of information that will be contained in the final report are as follows: - developing present parklands with specifics on what to do; - open -space to be acquired, if any, and how or if to develop it; i.e. softball fields, playground areas, tennis courts, etc.; - review existing recreation programs and determine how to enhance them, add to them or delete them; - review staffing with possible recommendations on reorganization in order to carry out the recommendations; - analyzing existing recreation facilities, i.e. community center, clark bldg., pier concession bldg., old prospect school, Biltmore site, etc. and make specific recommendations on the future use of those facilities; The final Master Plan will be very specific in what it recommends the City do in order to develop to it's fullest potential all the parks, recreation programs and recreation buildings and facilities in the City. These recommendations will be based on a great deal of input from the citizens of Hermosa Beach, via the Task Force, community surveys, public hearings, and an extensive review of what already exists in the area. The Master Plan will contain many specific recommendations with a scheduled phasing in plan for implementation and suggested ways to fund the projects. Staff and contractor will develop a monthly work schedule on which monthly progress payments will be made. A 10% retainer will be held until City Council approval of the final Master Plan. SUPPLEMENTAL 1 m `:FORMATION A member of the firm of Purkiss-Rose will be at the Council meeting should the City Council have any further questions or concerns. INTRODUCTION The City of Hermosa Beach is indeed unique: a compact, densely populated city, with a wide sandy beach as its front porch and the magnificent open space of the Pacific Ocean as its front yard. By their very nature, beach communities are associated with health, clean air, and recreation. In Hermosa Beach, recreation takes on a broader than usual meaning. The chances to walk out the door, see blue skies, breathe salt -laden air, watch the sea gulls gather, and then to stroll down the block may be a major form of recreation. Certainly taking the dog for a walk is a popular pastime. Residents pay dearly for the privilege of fresh air, open beaches, and the relaxed mileau only to watch thousands of visitors clutter their streets with cars and their beaches with bodies and litter. Such a City needs a plan for recreation that recognizes the special nature of a beach community from land resource limitations to ocean resource potential, from resident population needs to visitor population impacts. A Master Plan for Hermosa Beach will not be "off-the-shelf" but will acknowledge the concern and involvement of the citizens and will consider the special nature of properties like the Biltmore site and the railroad right-of-way. The Department of Community Resources has initiated a positive approach for the orderly development of parks and recreation services in Hermosa Beach through its request for proposals for preparation of a Master Plan for Parks and Recreation. The department recognizes that any Master Plan for program development, enhancement of existing park sites, land acquisition and development, implementation, and operations must be based on valid information about the current and anticipated needs of the resident population. Therefore, the task of the Consultant Team will be to assist the Community Resources Department in preparing a Master Plan and policy program based on the needs, resources, and opportunities of its constituents and to design conceptual studies for all park sites, owned and to -be -acquired, that best encompass those program requirements. This process will include significant community involvement throughout the analysis and planning phases. We propose a proven community input approach that involves a combination of surveys, structured workshops, and public hearings. The process produces valid information, allows for the recognition of the legitimacy of concerns of all groups and individuals, and develops a consensus of understanding and direction. The Master Plan and policy program will pay particular attention to identifying the recreation program needs of the City residents and to tying development recommendations to that program. At the same time, the plan will consider how the large visitor population affects and can contribute to recreation for the resident population.. In addition, the plan will give special consideration to means of funding, development, acquisition, and operations and maintenance, and priorities of development. The planning and design team of Purkiss-Rose Landscape Architects and Landerman-Moore, Planning. and Economics, under the direction of Stephan Rose, A.S.L.A, is committed to the development of a comprehensive Master Plan and policy program encompassing the present and future needs of all the residents of the City of Hermosa Beach. The scope of work we have developed for the Comprehensive Master Plan is based on the consultant team's involvement in the preparation of similar projects and our familiarity with beach communities. We understand the need to develop a plan that the community will support, that will be implementable in phases, and that will provide reliable direction for growth and development of recreation services. The successful completion of this project requires a knowledge and understanding of the unique characteristics of the region and of the beach communities as well as the ability to communicate and work together . effectively with public agencies and with the residents. We have the proven capabilities to complete this planning effort in an expedient and cost effective manner. PHILOSOPHY OF PUBLIC RECREATION Recreation represents a dynamic relationship between time, activity, and space. In simplest terms, recreation is any leisure time activity which is pursued for its own sake. Traditionally, leisure has been defined as a period of time and recreation as an activity in space. But in contemporary urban society, recreation has come to mean what happens to people in terms of self-image, achievement, or satisfaction. By this definition, the requirements for an effective recreation experience in a dense urban setting such as Hermosa Beach go beyond the traditional approach to public spaces and programs. A recreation setting includes any aspect of the city where an individual can experience freedom, diversity, self-expression, challenge, or enrichment. A recreation Master Plan must look at the totalcontext in which recreation occurs. Public recreation is one aspect of a complete community recreation system which also includes private non-profit and commercial recreation. In our view, public recreation planning includes the principles of access of all people to activities and facilities; co-ordination with other recreation opportunities; integration with other public services such as health and education; financial feasibility at all stages, including operations and maintenance; continous monitoring of effectiveness; and especially attention to the health, safety, and pleasure of intended users. Above all, public recreation planning should involve citizens at all stages of the process. 'By placing Parks and Recreation in the Department of Community Resources, the City of Hermosa Beach recognizes that leisure services and recreation are part of a broader responsibility to human services, life enrichment, and environmental planning. With this staff organization, the City expresses the relationship of leisure spaces and services to its social and physical environment. The Master Plan process offers the opportunity to define and amplify this relationship. APPROACH/METHODOLOGY This approach is based upon our past involvement in the preparation of comprehensive park and recreation master plans and related recreation projects using an interdisciplinary Consultant Team. The Consultant Team is comprised of specialists in the fields of park planning and design, needs analysis, recreation programming, economic planning, and community surveys. Principals of each firm will guide the project, develop its direction, and provide liason with you. The approach that has been designed into the detailed scope of work incorporates four techniques used successfully on similar projects: 1. extensive coordination with staff; consultation with the Master Plan Task Force, the Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources advisory Commission, and citizens; and the integration of their expertise into the planning process; 2. systematic concept development, group critique, and refinement to identify major components of the plans early in the planning process; 3. community surveys and workshops to establish consensus on program and facilities development; 4. the use of graphics to communicate planning and design concepts to community groups and decision makers. Further elaboration of these techniques is provided below. Coordination with City Staff, Task Force. and Advisory Commission The Consultant Team is familiar with community planning projects. We have found that team work and close coordination between staff, consultants, and public agencies is essential to a successful project. In the case of Hermosa Beach, we realize that the Advisory Commission and the Task Force are valuable resources in developing a comprehensive plan. We recognize that the Consultant Team will be responsible for ensuring that a high degree of coordination occurs and that project milestones are met. A major priority of the Consultant team will be to establish a continuing dialogue with staff, the Commission, and representatives of interested parties so that our products reflect community goals and City policy. Systematic Development of Alternatives Plans The Consultant Team has found that alternative land.use plans are developed most efficiently through a systematic process of needs identification, criteria statement, concept development, interdisciplinary review/critique and refinement. Frequent dialogue among the staff and members of the public is a dynamic and effective way to structure efficient planning concepts. This process results in a rapid consensus on the major components of alternative plans. This approach has been incorporated into the detailed Scope of Work as a means of ensuring that the development of alternatives results in realistic and implementable park development alternatives. The Consultant Team's prior experience with concept formulation, alternatives development, and consensus building is an important ingredient in the successful completion of the comprehensive Master Plan. Community Surveys and Workshops The Consultant Team suggests a program of community and special interest surveys using computer analysis. Also, Task Force and agency workshops will be the forum to establish project goals,, introduce alternative plans, and obtain public comment. We propose to work closely with Staff and to organize and further define this element of the planning program. A properly designed community involvement program will ensure that opportunities for public review and comment occur at the appropriate stages of the planning process. Graphic Communication The importance of graphics as an effective communications tool in planning cannot be overemphasized. The Consultant Team prides itself on the superior quality of the graphic products from its planning and design activities. We propose that both graphic and written media be used to document the alternative and final conceptual programs and designs prepared by the Consultant Team members. We recommend that exhibits, illustrations, maps, and other graphic media be used as extensively as the project dictates. PUBLIC INPUT PROCESS A program of public involvement is fundamental to the credibility of any study on recreation services. Early in the planning process, we will establish a system to obtain maximum input from groups, organizations, special interests and individuals representing both users and non-users of park facilities and programs. A typical fault of many planning programs is the tendency to emphasize the comments and reactions of special interests. Although special interest groups input is essential to the improvement of existing facilities and programs, it does not usually identify or support the leisure attitudes or preferences of the non -user. The consultant team's public input process will incorporate a variety of input sources in an effort to assemble a data base that accurately reflects the recreation interests and desires of the City as a whole. The program will include: .Questionaires .Surveys .Workshops .On-site Observation of User Behavior .Public Hearings Each of these activities will be employed as a method to generate factual input, concepts, ideas and concerns of the community. Our. scope of work indicates how each process will be used. We see three major objectives for the public involvement process in determining specific needs: information, public relations, and conflict resolution. Information: The process determines the problems to be solved and identifies solutions which are acceptable to the public. Public participation provides the planner with an opportunity to test perceptions of needs, as well as the public a chance to be the source of viable alternatives. In developing alternatives, the public also develops a commitment to change and is less resistant to new proposals. Public Relations: In order for a plan to gain acceptance, it must have wide public support; the public must have confidence and trust in the agency and in the planning procedures and projects Conflict Resolution: In fact, there is not one public, but many publics. Conflicts between publics participating in a planning study are bound to occur due to differences in interest, values, opinions, beliefs or to a scarcity in some resource. The process of conflict resolution employed by the planner determines, whether this conflict is cooperative or competitive. The synergistic workshop approach proposed by the consultant team leads to consensus seeking. Openness and sharing of authority and information develops a trusting, friendly atmosphere. The workshop program proposed by the consultant team is specifically organized and structured to provide a basis for issue solving and creative/energetic exchange of ideas, information and concern. The workshops will be 2 to 3 hour sessions organized with specific issues and objective statements,'work assignments. for the participants, and timed segments of work. These workshops will be facilitated by the'consultant team who will provide the facilitator, recorder, and structure of the workshops. The workshop physical layout will be predetermined as it is important to the exchange that must occur to gain meaningful information. We propose three to five Agency/Task Force Workshops during the Interim Report Phase and up to three workshops during the.Implementation Phase. These workshops will provide preparation for Public Hearings. The Synergy Workshop process was developed by synergy consultation services in 1972 and has been used successfully by many public and private organizations in the development of policy and management tools. The consultant team is trained in and has successfully employed this technique for over twelve years. A particular example of its success is the Malibu State Beach and the Adamson Estate segment of the Southern California Coastline Recreation Development Plan. SCOPE OF SERVICES/PRODUCTS As suggested in the request for proposal, the Master Plan process falls into two parts: the Interim Report; the Final Implementation Plan. The Interim Report will document the research and analysis phases of the project; the final plan will use this information as a basis for its recommendation. Following, we describe in detail our proposed Scope of Services for each part of this project by highlighting our philosophy, goals, objectives, tasks and procedures, and products. Part 1: Development of the Interim Report Philosophy In the Urban Setting, the use of leisure time has important implications for human development, community development, resource conservation, and the quality of life. Recreation planning and design can have consequences for making people's lives and communities better. In order to achieve this, services should be defined in terms of human experiences rather than strictly by activities, programs, and buildings, and should expand to include a concern for all aspects of the living environment. Most of all, planning must be done with, instead of for, people. Such a definition leads to a behavioral approach to assessing demand for recreation; that, is, the focus is placed on the experience, why a person participates, what activities are preferred, and what happens to a person as a result of the activity. This approach contributes to analysis of non-use, latent and expressed demand, future trends, and the needs of people at the neighborhood level. Goal: to develop a credible data base and a thorough analysis that will support any policy statements. Objectives: To achieve this goal, we plan to coordinate with staff and obtain maximum citizen input in order to identify major issues, assess recreation demand, and produce a needs assessment on which a draft statement of policies will be based. Tasks and Procedures A. Project Definition 1. Refine and agree upon the scope and intent of the project. 2. Develop liason and coordination. 3. Submit a public participation program which will include ways to include citizen -at -large representation in the Citizens Master Plan Task Force. 4. Submit a final program of accomplishment.w.ith a schedule_of completion. 6. Research and Fact Finding: 1. Identify regional, citywide, and neighborhood characteristics through review of demographic, economic, tax and planning reports for the area. The following information will be sought: a. Population by enumeration districts which specifically identify with the urban core, surrounding communities and regional area. Data will be a complete demographic breakdown including socio- economic information. b. Employment data for those governmental, business and institutional entities which exist in the project area. c. Visitation estimates for recreationists coming to the area or persons doing business with government, retail business and institutional entities. d. Listing and schedule of any beach area, 'downtown' or 'civic center' special events and activities which generate spectators and participation by the local residents and visitors to the area. e. Listing of past and present cultural, musical, art, political, educations and special event programs conducted in the community or area. f. The number of parking spaces available within the urban community core area in all categories including street (metered and not metered), lots, (public and private), parking structures (public and private), and parking allocated for service and emergency equipment. 2. Identify public and private entities that supply recreation programs and facilities that serve residents and visitors. 3. Develop profile of current recreation users and programs. The following information will be sought:. a. Current or historical frequency of use of recreational resources by category and by days of week and hours of day and by seasonal influences. b. Specific information regarding user interest groups, their representatives, type and scope of user activity, duration of use and seasonal relationships to use activities. 4. Inspect and evaluate all recreational resources within the city including the beach, school facilities, parks, the Biltmore site, railroad right-of-way, and all other possible open space elements and facilities. These elements might include alleys, parking lots, leftover spaces, conversion areas, view areas, sidewalks - in short, any physical feature or linkage which might contribute to the city itself becoming the recreation experience for its residents. 5. Investigate the relationship of existing and proposed urban structural mass to potential park sites and the relative affects these structural mass patterns may have on park sites in terms of use activities and quality of recreational experience. 6. Identify existing and potential revenue sources. 7. Review all aspects of research and fact finding with staff as a continual monitoring process. C. Demand Analysis: 1. Conduct a survey to identify latent and existing demand. The survey will be structured to allow a tabulation of questions of fact, questions of opinion and attitude, informational questions and self - perception questions. a. Prepare survey script b. Review with staff c. Administer survey d. Tabulate and analyze survey for use in Task Force workshops and staff meetings. 2. Organize a series of "synergy workshops" to effectively bring together the various user groups, governmental and organizational interests, and the community to work on specific needs, user preferences and surveys, and other information to define the issues of recreation and develop a demand profile. The workshops will be conducted with the Citizens Master Plan Task Force. a. Prepare workshop agendas or scripts b. Consider revenue generation possibliities c. Review with staff d. Facilitate workshops e. Summarize information —10— M.. •-�.ist-�crdFtc, kc�+-.�i�1i�*,�C`'.;.`�Yii 'iX'�:i".:.p �, 3. Perform on-site observation at selected sites to document actual use patterns for a specific period of time and at various times of day or day of week a. Select observation method(s) b. Perform observation c. Record information for use at workshops 4. Develop an estimate of demand for recreation services. D. Statement of Needs: 1. Develop standards of service based on recreation demand. 2. Develop a classification system for recreation activity based on user experience criteria. 3. Determine the relative magnitude of use and demand in each classification. 4. Describe program and facility needs in terms of public service activities and revenue producing activities. 5. Apply criteria for facilities and program needs a. People orientation b. Feasibility (cost/benefit) c. Relevance d. Practicality (ability of community to deliver the service) 6. Translate demand analysis into space, location and facility requirements necessary to support activities determined to be important. This activity will allow us to identify: a. Neighborhood characteristics and proximity to resources. b. Existing facilities improvement opportunities c. New facilities needs by type, size, location, and character d. Relative priority and phasing 7. Conduct community workshop to review, evaluate and provide a "reality check" on proposals. —11— E. Prepare Interim Report 1. Include in the report: a. Base data b. Planning approach c. Major issues d. Evaluation of citizen input e. Resource assessment f. Demand analysis g. Needs assessment h. Draft policy statement i. Recreation service goals for the city 2. Review by Commission and Council 3. Conduct a public hearing 4. Modify as necessary 5. Approval by Commission and Council Products The following products will be generated in the process of developing the Interim Report, and will be included in it: 1. Inventory maps, tables, and diagrams 2. Statement of issues 3. Profile of population and recreation service user 4. Demographic study 5. Use patterns and schedules 6. Survey information 7. Workshop evaluations 8. Estimate of demand 9. Criteria for evaluation 10. Standards of service 11. Assessment of needs 12. Statement of goals 13. Draft policy statement -12- Part 2: Implementation: Philosophy: A master plan for Parks and Recreation is only as useful as its implementation section makes it. While criteria of feasibility and practicality will have been applied during the needs assessment, the plan must still attend to management programs, funding of development, operations and management, and phasing of development. Goal: to develop a Comprehensive Master Plan for Parks and Recreation that is based on citizen needs and is realistic and implementable. Objectives: to work closely with staff and the Citizens Task Force to develop city wide alternative concepts for development and related organization and management programs; to identify funding methods for development and for operations and management; to identify potential environmental impacts; to prepare conceptual plans for recommended development projects; to provide estimates of probable costs. Tasks and Procedures: A. Physical development 1. Prepare conceptual studies for physical development that reflect the findings, concensus, and policies of the interim report. 2. Develop estimates of probable cost 3. Review alternatives with staff 4. Conduct a Task Force workshop to gain community direction 5. Gain concensus on preferred concept B. Organization and Management: 1. Evaluate the existing organizational and management qualities and capacities of the Parks and Recreation Department (Community Resources Department) and make recommendations on the following: a. Organization structure and lines of responsibility b. Staffing requirements and categories of employee services c. Relationships to other community services and area service agencies d. Future requirements for organizational and management services e. Training and educational opportunities for staff to enhance job performance and quality of service 2. Organize, prepare and discuss the analysis with the Director and other persons involved in policy procedures where organization and employee development and services are a consideration. C. Funding Methods: 1. Analyze existing funding programs and conduct evaluations of the present procedures and authorizations for funding Parks and Recreational programs and services in Hermosa Beach. 2. Conduct a Task Force workshop to provide community attitudes and consideration for funding. Several options and funding innovations will be discussed. Additionally, an analysis of the options for new• funding sources we will conduct in order to identify the suitability and use of methods which may require legislative or ordinance activity and administrative as well as legal review. 3. Assess funding options in terms of a financing program that identifies revenue centers and activities which create revenues specifically for recreation purposes. 4. Consider a number of funding programs. The following is a artial list of those which will be assessed. . User Fees . Concessions Contracts . Growth Fees . Certificates of Participation . Corporate Sponsorship . Tax Override or Special Tax . Bonds . Public/Private Joint Participation . Special Events Revenues . 5. Evaluate the funding options in terms of their respective probability of being used or implemented and the extent to which they will generate funds for the implementation of projects and services. D. Preliminary Environmental Investigation: Provide the City direction on potential for environmental impacts of plan implementation. E. Recommended Development Projects: 1. Prepare conceptual studies of development projects which would implement the concensus city wide recreation concept. 2. Provide probable estimates of cost F. Priority Program: 1. Develop a priority program for the development of facilities and services 2. Tie priority program to the C.I.P. and other funding sources. 3. Review with staff 4. Discuss and evaluate in workshop format. G. Draft Plan: 1. Prepare the final draft of the Comprehensive Master Plan including information from the interim plan and summarize all information developed in the implementation phase. The plan will include but not be limited to the following: a. An executive summary b. Program and use activities development plan c. Recreational resource and new development plan d. Conceptual diagrams of development projects e. Facilities enhancement and land acquisition plan f. Costing and funding plan g. Phasing and implementation plan h. Operations and management plan 2. Review plan with staff 3. Conduct a public hearing 4. Submit, review, and discuss final draft with Advisory Commission and City Council 5. Revise as necessary. 6. Submit 35 printed copies and camera ready copy for City use. Products The following products will be generated in the process of developing the final Master Plan: 1. City wide concepts 2. Estimates of probable cost 3. Concensus concept 4. Recommendation on organization and management 5. Assessment of funding options 6. Preliminary environmental investigation 7. Conceptual studies of development projects 8. Priority program and funding program 9. Draft plan 10. Final plan MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Monday, May 22, 1989 at the hour of 6:03 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - General Services Director Joan Noon ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams Absent: None The Council adjourned to a committee of the whole. 1. CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY 1989-1990 BUDGET An overview of the budget was explained by City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft. The Council reviewed each individual department's budget. Requests for more information and reports were made; and the City Manager will coordinate. Action: To remove $2,800 for the ElectroVote system from the City Council's Budget. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered, noting the objections of Sheldon and Williams. A recess was called at 8:20 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 8:30 P.M. 2. CONSIDERATION OF FY 89-90 - FY 93-94 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRELIMINARY BUDGET. The various CIP Projects were reviewed, and requests for more information or reports were made by the Councilmembers; and the City Manager will see that these come back. Action: CIP 91-511 - Railroad Right -of -Way Parking Lot - to move this up to the 90-91 Fiscal Year. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive - addressed Computer needs, oil drilling, and General Plan updating. ADJOURNMENT The Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California adjourned on Monday, May 22, 1989 at the hour of 10:13 P.M. to an Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, May 23, 1989 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. /1i/41466.16;fA5176W) Ckty Clerk 1 - 1 - Minutes 5-22-89 MINUTES,OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California held on Tuesday, May 23, 1989 at the hour of 7.:30 P. M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Don MacPherson ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Wiliams Absent: None • PROCLAMATIONS - National Public Works Week, May 21-27, 1989 PRESENTATION A PLAQUE TO CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY DWAYNE BEAVER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER. Mayor Williams and Tony Antich, Public Works Director, accepted the plaque. PRESENTATION BY VINCE DE LUCA, PRESIDENT OF SOUTH BAY BOARD OF REALTORS, OF BOOKLET ENTITLED 'CALIFORNIA HOUSING CRISIS - THE AMERICAN DREAM DEFERRED". Copies of the booklet are available in the City Clerk's office and the Library. PRESENTATION 'EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER' AWARDS Gail Brown, Police Records Administrator Henry Leroy Staten, General Services Coordinator The awards were presented by Mayor Williams and Robert Blackwood, Personnel Director. CITIZEN COMMENTS Wilma Burt - 1152 7th Street - re: 1(h) reclassification Richard Seeley - 1703 Manhattan - re: 1(m) legal adver tising contract. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (r) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (h) Williams; (i) Sheldon; (j) Simp- son; (k) Williams; (m) Williams; (n) Creighton; and (o) Sheldon. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes as follows: 1) Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on May 3, 1989; 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on May 9, 1989. 1a 2 - 1 - Minutes 5-23-89 (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 29884,.29992 through 30124 inclusive, and noting voided warrants numbers 29998 through 30001 inclusive and 30052. 0 (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) (e) (f ) (g) (h) Recommendation to receive and file the April, 1989 financial reports: 1) Revenue and Expenditure reports; 2) City Treasurer's Report. Recommendation to approve Final Map #19655•for a two - unit condominium located at 1181 Cypress Avenue. Memo- randum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 15, 1989. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5271, entitled, "A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP 119655 FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1181 CYPRESS AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Recommendation to approve Final Map 119868 for a two - unit condominium conversion located at 858 Loma Drive. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 15, 1989. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5752, entitled, "A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP 119868 FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION PROJECT LOCATED AT 858 LOMA DRIVE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Recommendation to approve in concept the hiring of a consultant to initiate a Records Management Program and authorize staff to prepare an RFP for said services sub- ject to approval of the expenditure in the 1989-90 bud- get. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon and City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated May 10, 1989. Recommendation to receive and file status report of reclassification testing. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated May 16, 1989. Action: To continue discussion of the present matter on this subject. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered, noting the objections of Rosenberger and Sheldon. Further Action: To appoint Councilmember Creighton as member to a committee with the City Manager and Person- nel Director to look into the matter and report back to the Council - 2 - Minutes 5-23-89 (i) (j) (k) (1) Motion Simpson, second Williams. So ordered, noting the objections of Sheldon and Rosenberger. (Rosenberger ob- jecting because the item is being brought before the Council at this time.) • Proposed Further Action: For this item to be brought back .on the next agenda. Motion Creighton - dies for lack of second. Addressing the Council at this time was: Wilma Burt - 1152- 7th Street Final Action: To receive and file the reclassification status report. Motion Simpson, second Williams. So ordered. Recommendation to approve the K-9 program for the Police Department. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated May 15, 1989. Action: To approve the K-9 program for the Police Department and allow them to continue the fund raising efforts toward attaining 100% of the funds through dona- tions and funding from the Narcotics Forfeiture Fund, if necessary; to grant authorization to purchase and train one narcotics detection patrol dog by October, 1989 in order to field a K-9 team; and to receive and file this report. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to receive and file report on staffing Friday telephone coverage. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated May 15, 1989. Action: To receive and Motion Williams, second Recommendation to send meat. Memorandum from dated May 16, 1989. file. Creighton. So ordered. letter on Federal drug enforce - City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft Action: To approve sending the letter supporting the effort of the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County to urge more Federal actions and emphasis to aid Los Angeles County's war on drugs with the following change: last line to read, "We pledge our utmost efforts to this end and most respectfully request your assistance in order to meet the challenges of drug trafficking and abuse". Each Councilmember will individually endorse. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered. Recommendation to approve Request for Proposals for Capital Financial Advisor. Memorandum from Finance Ad- ministrator Viki Copeland dated May 16, 1989. - 3 - Minutes 5-23-89 (m) (n) (o) (p) Recommendation to direct staff to negotiate a three-year extension to the current City legal advertising contract. with the Easy Reader. Memorandum from City Clerk Kath- leen Midstokke dated May 17, 1989. Action: To approve the staff negotiating a three-year extension to the current City legal advertising contract with the Easy Reader. Motion Simpson, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting objection of Counciimember Creighton. Recommendation to award agreement for sewer capital im- provement program analysis, CIP 88-407. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 15, 1989. Action: To authorize the Mayor to sign an Agreement with James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc., for Sewer Capital Improvement Program Analysis, CIP 88- 407, in an amount not to exceed $15,950.00; to authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within budget limitations. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered. Recommendation to award bids for purchase of vehicles for the Building & Safety, Police and Public Works Departments; and to authorize procedure for the purchase of used vehicles for the Community Resources and Public Works Departments. Memorandum from Public Safety Direc- tor Steve Wisniewski, Building and Safety Director Wil- liam Grove, and Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 17, 1989. Action: To award bids for purchase of vehicles to the low bidders meeting specifications for each vehicle; to approve a budget transfer of $2,200 from Equipment Ser- vice, to the Parks Division; and to approve the recom- mended procedure for purchase of used vehicles. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to approve request for County design and administration of street resurfacing projects for por- tions of Valley/Ardmore and for portions of Prospect Avenue. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 15, 1989. Recommendation to approve Deed Restriction on City lots for sale. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 17, 1989. Recommendation to authorize the sale of forfeited vehicle via Nationwide Commercial Auction Systems. 4 Minutes 5-23-89 Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated'May 17, 1989. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. •(a) ORDINANCE NO. 89-985 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO: 88-970 TO ADD A GRANDFATHER CLAUSE. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-985. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 89-986 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 19-52 TO RE -DEFINE THROUGH STREETS. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-986. Motion Simpson, second Creighton. So ordered. (c) ORDINANCE NO. 89-987 - AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING, RATIFYING, AND READOPTING ORDINANCE NOS. 85-804, 86-832, 86-837, 87-896, AND 88-967 CONCERNING TAX MEASURES. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-987. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. (d) ORDINANCE NO. 89-988 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE TO C-3 FOR THE AREA LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 4, BLOCK 1, TRACT 6851 AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DEC- LARATION. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-988. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. (e) ORDINANCE NO. 89-989 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE TO C-2 FOR THE AREA LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1-10 INCLUSIVE, AND 30, 31, BLOCK 14 OF HERMOSA BEACH TRACT AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-989. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. At this time items (h), (i), (j), (k), (m), (n), and (o) were discussed but are listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC - None 5 Minutes 5-23-89 PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ELIMINATE VIDEO SALES AND RENTALS IN THE C-1 AND C-2 ZONES, with ordinance for waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 15, 1989. Action: To waive, full reading of Ordinance No. 89-990, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO DELETE VIDEO SALES AND RENTALS IN THE C-1 AND C-2 ZONES, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Final Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 89-990. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. 6. SECOND QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - BILTMORE SITE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION CHANGING THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE ZONING OF THE PUBLICLY OWNED PORTION OF BILTMORE SITE FROM SPA TO OPEN SPACE (PUBLIC PLAZA) FOR THAT PORTION WEST OF BEACH DRIVE AND TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND C-2 FOR THAT PORTION EACH OF BEACH DRIVE BETWEEN 14TH STREET AND 15TH STREET, with resolution for adoption and ordinance for waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 15, 1989. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak was: Pat Hill - Manhattan Avenue - served on Advisory Task Force; asking for clarification on C-1, C-2, C-3. The Public Hearing was closed. Action: To send back to Planning Commission to hold a hearing inviting the Task Force Committee to attend or send in their suggestions, regarding the issues relating to parking, commercial (15th Street), viability of the site as it is, and parking alternaties. With the City Attorney's imput at the Planning level and imput regard- ing the end result of any initiative based on the exist- ing recommendations. Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon. So ordered. Further Action: Any action on the Biltmore Site Commit- tee recommendation or recommendation of this Council be put on the ballot in November. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. A recess was called at 9:10 P.M. 6 Minutes 5-23-89 The meeting reconvened at 9:22 P.M. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. APPROVAL OF OPEN SPACE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS - HERMOSA BEACH GREENBELT: Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated May 12, 1989. Action: To authorize the Mayor.to sign the Open Space Acquisition Agreement and escrow instructions for,pur- chase of the 19-1/2.acres of right-of-way commonly known as the Hermosa Beach Greenbelt, & appropriate $110,000. from the 4% Utility User Tax right-of-way fund for the initial deposit. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. S� ordered. Further Action: To provide that any subsequent amend- ments are non -substantive. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered. 8. DEMONSTRATION OF NEW NOISE EQUIPMENT. Oral report from Public Safety Director. Director Wisniewski showed the noise equipment to the City Council and gave the decibal readings for each Councilmember's voice. 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager Northcraft gave an oral report regarding the auction of three surplus lots: 634 -1st Street - $ 402,000 705 -1st Street - 351,000 704 -1st Street - 331,000 $1,084,000 (This is $ 150,000 over our expected revenue.) 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Scheduling a joint meeting with the Planning Commission. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated May 18, 1989. Action: To hold meeting in abeyance until issues of upcoming re -appointment and discussion of another mem- bers attendance on Planning Commission are resolved. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered. 11. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: - 7 - Minutes 5-23-89 (•a ) (b) (c) Request by Councilmember Simpson for discussion of add- ing a path or walkway on northside of 21st Street between PCH.and Ardmore. Proposed Action: To direct staff to take action promptly to put in pathway of woodchips or something better and encourage property owners to improve their properties. Motion Simpson , dies for lank of second. Action: To discuss this item. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Final Action: To refer to staff for a report as soon as possible regarding 21st Street and any other streets with similar situations. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Councilmember Rosenberger gave an oral report on the fire flow system from a memo submitted by Public Safety Director Wisniewski, which was: Seven (7) hydrants replaced Fifteen (15) new hydrants installed 700'+ of 6" main 800'+ of 8" main 1500'+ 12" main Five (5) hydrant replacement heads are scheduled Four (4) hydrants are ordered Only forty-one (41) hydrants with no 4" connections left in the City. There were sixty-six (66) eight months ago. Director Wisniewski indicated all of the mains and five (5) of the hydrants had been paid for by Califor- nia Water Company. Mayor Williams commended Councilmember Sheldon regarding his organization, thru the Rotary, of the "Day at City Hall" for students to reside at a mock City Council meeting. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Parker Herriott - Re: neighbors construction Richard Sullivan - objects to videos in the C-3 area; feels it effects people the same in all areas. ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California adjourned to Tuesday, May 23, 1989, at the hour of 10:20 P.M. to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, June 13, 1989 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. 8 Deputy City Clerk Minutes 5-23-89 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California held on.Thursday, June 1, 1989 at the hour of 5:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Linda Riddle, Deputy City Clerk. ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams Absent: none • 1. AUTHORIZATION TO SIGN AGREEMENT FOR INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES ieIITH CHARLES (CASEY) S. VOSE OF OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR, AND EINBODEN. Action: To authorize the agreement with Charles (Casey) Vose for services as interim City Attorney with the Mayor signing the agreement. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton, So ordered. 2. REVIEW OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECOMMENDATION ON POWER STREET AREA DRAINAGE. Item 2B was discussed at this time, but listed in order for clarity. A. AUTHORIZATION TO CONTRACT FOR STORM DRAIN STUDY; Action: To authorize contracting for a study of this drainage area with Los Angeles county, appropriate $5,000 from Prospective Expenditures for study. Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon. So ordered. B. CONSIDERATION OF URGENCY MORATORIUM ON CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE DRAINAGE AREA. Proposed Action: To introduce emergency ordinance No. 89- , entitled "AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS OR CONTI- TIONAL USE PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF STRUCTURES, AND/OR ADDITIONS TO STRUCTURES WITHIN THE DRAINAGE AREA(S) AS DESIGNATED AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP." Motion Creighton, second Simpson. Motion withdrawn at this time by the maker and second. Proposed Action: To waiver full reading of ordinance No. 89 - Motion Creighton, second Simpson. AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams NOES - None At this time Councilmember Rosenberger withdrew his Yes vote on the waiver of full reading and read the entire text of the proposed ordinance. 1 Minutes 6-1-89 13 3 Proposed Final Action: To adopt ordinance No. 89 entitled, 'AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A MORA- TORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS OR CONDIT- IONAL USE PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF STRUCTURES, AND/OR ADDITIONS TO STRUCTURES WITHIN THE DRAINAGE AREA(S) AS DESIGNATED AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP.' Motion Creighton, second Simpson. AYES - Creighton, Simpson, Mayor Williams NOES - Rosenberger, Sheldon (Motion failed for lack of 4/5 vote) 3. AUTHORIZATION TO SIGN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICAT- IONS OF BUYERS OF `THREE SURPLUS CITY LOTS (Publicly auctioned on May 18, 1989). Action: To authorize the Mayor to sign applications. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. ADJOURNMENT The Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday, May 9, 1989 at the hour of 5:40 P.M. to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, June 13, 1989 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Deputy City Clerk - 2 - Minutes 6-1-89 • -41, CITY-OF-HERMOSA-BEACH - -, O 2T. a FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0001 TIME 15:42:49 FOR 06/13/89 DATE 06/08/89 4 s PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # + e DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION• . AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP .-- -- -- ._ --- _______________ - .-------- - -- -----. . - --� H CITY OF SANTA/*CSFM0 02867 001-400-1202-4316 00244 $20.00 07391 30126 ~ I. SEM REG/S. WARREN - - -- 05/22/89 FINANCE ADMIN. --/TRAINING $0.00 06/07/89 4 ,r b 9 1a •', *** VENDOR TOTAL*******-x••It•x•**************************************a********•p•x•#*•p•• •a•**** • $20.00 • H CYCLOPS COMPANY 01161 160-400-8406-4201 00019 $3.084.46 08803 30129 CLEAN & INSPECT SEWERS 06/01/89 CIP 86-405 -/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/07/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************•************************************************** $3.084.46 • '' .3 4b lr 5� •, I H FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMM. 02869 001-400-2101-4307 00175 $30.00 08907 30125 RADIO LICENSE APP -FEE -•----- 05/22/89 POLICE /RADIO MAINTENANCE — - $0.00 - 06/07/89 • -• *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $30.00 H DON*KOTT FORD 02868 001-400-1207-5403 00001 $10.834.25 PURCHASE BUS LIC CAR - — — -- 05/25/89 BUS LICENSE •--/VEHICLES-- 01764 30128 $0.00 06/07/89 H DON*KOTT FORD 02868 001-400-4201-5403 00001 $10.834.25 01764 30128 PURCHASE BUILDING CAR ------ -------- - ------05/25/89 BUILDING -------/VEHICLES - . - - $0.00 06/07/89 H DON*KOTT FORD 02868 001-400-4202-5403 00001 *10,834.25 01764 30128 PURCHASE PUB WKS CAR 05/25/89 PUB WKS ADMIN /VEHICLES $0.00 06/07/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $32.502.75 • • • a H LA BONNE VIE BEACHWEAR 02866 001-400-4601-4308 00170 $112.00 .07789 30132 VOLLEYBALL -TOURNEY HATS - — -- 06/07!89.............COMM -RESOURCES—(PROGRAM-MATER IALS --- $0.00 06/07/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $112.00 H POSTMASTER 00097 001-400-4601-4302 00049 $950.00 07780 30131 BULK MAIL/SUMMER REC PRG ---- 06/05/89 - COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING - $0.00 06/07/89 * * * VENDOR TOTAL $950.00 • H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT' SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00299 $80,173.35 RETIREMENT/APRIL 89 - 05/25/89 RETIREMENT ------/RETIREMENt 30127 ' $0.00 06/07/89 • 1. lk = .. CITY OF HERMOSA-BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0002 TIME 15:42:49 FOR 06/13/89 DATE 06/08/09 71 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00300 $Q1.347.68CR 30127 RETIREMENT/APRIL 89 05/25/89 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT $0.00 06/07/89 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.• 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00301 $102.97 30127 RETIREMENT ADJ/NOV 88 -05/25/89--- - RETIREMENT ----/RETIREMENT $0.00 06/07/89 o H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00302 $79.083.31 30133 o"' RETIREMENT ADV/MAY 89 06/08/89 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT $0.00 06/08/89 11 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 105-400-2601-4180 00098 $757.88 30127 1x'-' ---25/89 STREET-I-IGHTING-YRETIREMENT $0.00 06/07/89 - RETIREMENT/APRIL-89----------------05/ H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 110-400-3301-4180 00099 $183.10 30127 1. . RETIREMENT/APRIL 89 05/25/89 VEH PKG DIST- --/RETIREMENT $0.00 06/07/89 ' 15 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00099 $5.068.55 30127 16- RETIREMENT/APRIL 89 --- ------ 05/25/89--------- PARKING-ENF------/RETIREMENT---------•- ------- -- --- - $0.00 06/07/89 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 145-400-3401-4180 00073 $152.56 30127 14 RETIREMENT/APRIL 89 05/25/89 i DIAL A RIDE /RETIREMENT', $0.00 06/07/89 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 145-400-3402-4180 00073 $56.89 30127 - RETIREMENT/APRIL 89 — --- ---05/25/89---- ----- -- •- ESEA ---- — /RETIREMENT--------- -_-- -.. $0.00 -06/07/89 1 H PUB EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 145-400-3403-4180 00023 $15.94 30127 :x- RETIREMENT/APRIL 89 05/25/89 BUS PASS SUBSDY /RETIREMENT $0.00 06/07/89 ;i H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 155-400-2102-4180 00071 $120.08 30127 94 RETIREMENT/APRIL 89----- - 05/25/89---------- — - CROSSING-GUARD—/RETIREMENT $0.-00 --- 06/07/891 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00098 $877.51 30127 ;e RETIREMENT/APRIL 89 05/25/89--- SEWER/ST DRAIN -/RETIREMENT----- $0.00 06/07/89 - • PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 705-400-1209-4180 00022 $228.20 30127 re - -- :RETIREMENT/APRIL -89 --- --- 05/25/89---- - ----LIABILITY-INS /RETIREMENT - $0.00 06/07/89 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 705-400-1217-4180 00022 $282.28 •RETIREMENT/APRIL 89 05/25/89 WORKERS COMP - /RETIREMENT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL****************•**************************************************** $85.754.94 :9 30127 1 ,o 06/07/89 *** PAY CODE TOTAL********************************************************#********* $122.454.15 R • • ADVANCE.ELEVATOR ELEV-MAINT/JUNE-89 21-793 • 31 n113" • l: •4 -i • 00003 001-400-4204-4201 00321 $80.00 21793 00003 30137 06/01/89 BLDG-MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/08/ r r , FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:42:49 • PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF-HERMOSA—BEACH DEMAND'LIST FOR 06/13/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ Q ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION — PAGE 0003 ' DATE 06/08/89 :• INV/REF PO Q CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 4 *** VENDOR TOTAL***********a******************************************************** R MARIA J. *ALLCORN --REIMQ-TOWING FEES R MARIA J.*ALLCORN REIMB TOWING FEES $80.00 02870 001-300-0000-3841 00184 $35.00 DR89-1545 ---------1545------05/11189 1545------05/11!89 —/POLICETOWING-------_-- 02870 110-400-3302-4201 00207 $45.00 DR89-1545 —1545 05/11/89 PARKING ENF /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $80.00 08597 30138 $0.00 06/07/89 9 08597 30138 $0.00 06/07/89 n R COMMANDER ANTHONY*ALTFELD MEALS/COMP APPS CLASS - 00774 001-400-2101-4313 00204 $21.75 05/18/89 05/18/89. - --• - STC *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS MISC CHGS/NAY 89 • $21.75 „• 13 08908 30139 $0.00 06/07/89 -- +5 00857 001-400-2101-4306 -- 05/31/89 POLICE 00661 $348.00 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE *ax VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ASAP FIRE PROTECTION DISPATCH FIRE EXTINGUISH 20615 00250 001-400-2201-4309 06/02/89 FIRE $348.00 00692 $79.88 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * • R AUTOMOTIVE PAINT CENTER MISC CHCS/MAY 89 •-- • $79.88 00053 30140 $0.00 06/08/89 16 17 .1 20615 08317 30141 $79.88 06/07/89 „ 01891 001-400-3104-4309 00247 $298.87 ------05/31/89 05/31/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ---- VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************.************************* R JOHN P. *BARRY LEGAL SERV/APRIL 89 $298.87 00031 001-400-1132-4201 00032 $675.00 04/30/89 CTY PROSECUTOR /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR•TOTAL******************************************************************** • R BAY COPY CENTER •& FAX PAPER/POLI.CE OFFICE SUPP. 02536 /1662 - - --- 05/30/89 $675.00 00054 30142 $0.00 06/08/89 24 l:6 2? 3n' 08261 30143 , • $0.00 06/07/89 $155.40 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1581/1662 08520 30144 $116.55 06/08/89 • 31 (:, 001-400-2101-4305 0101349. 33 36' FINANCE—SFA340. TIME 15:42:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION • VND # DATE INVC CITY-OF—HERMOSA—BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/13/89 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION J 3 PAGE 0004 DATE 06/08/89 2- INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************• R BEACH TRAVEL — AIRFARE ADV/J.- WILLIAMS—TR249------ R BEACH TRAVEL AIRFARE ADV/ROSENBERGER TR250 • $155.40 00252 001-400-1101-4317 00319 $258.00 05/31/89------ --- ----CITY--COUNCIL—/CONFERENCE EXPENSE 00252 001-400-1101-4317 00322 $258.00 05/31/89 CITY COUNCIL /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR • TOTAL ********************•*** w**a•***at•p•*•p•**a••x**•µ****it*a•u**•x*#*••p•**•lt******•n* • R BISHOP MONTGOMERY HIGH SCHOOL DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 76986 $516.00 TR249 00249 30145 $0.00 06/07/89'j TR250 00250 30145 9 $0.00 06/07/89 s 01988 001-210-0000-2110 05/31/89 -- 02919 $500.00 76986 08433 ---- /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************•+r***•x•r*****•******•****•**********•****•*****•*•* • R ROBERT*BLACKWOOD MON EXP/APR—MAY 89 $500.00 00366 001-400-1203-4305 00212 $65.52 05/15/89 PERSONNEL - /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************•***********u•*********************•* • R JIM*BLICKENSDERFER LIGHT TECH/MAY.24. 89 $65.52 01303 001-400-4601-4201 00338 $42.00 05/25/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************•************************************************** R STATE*BOARD OF EQUALIZATION QTRLY COST/ALLOC TAPES: 10745 $42.00 it J 30146 " 06/08/89 08258 30147 " $0.00 06/07/89 07784 30148 ' $0.00 06/07/89 2. 02411 001-400-1207-4251 00008 $37.95 8E10745 01765 30149 I, 05/25/89 -- - - - BUS LICENSE -----/CONTRACT -SERVICE/GOVT- $0.00 06/07/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL*•*******•*********************•******•*********************#*******•It*** R ; BROOKES ELECTRIC EMERG REP/TENNIS COURTS- 8492 $37.95 00355 001-400-4205-4309 00371 $55.00 05/23/89 EQUIP SERVICE -/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 8492 08831 30150 -1 $0.00 06/07/89 2 R • BROOKES ELECTRIC 00355 001-400-8604-4201 00106 $480.69 8436 08810 30150 EMERG REP/THEATRE L-ITEE= 8436----04/30/89------------ -CIP 86-604--/CONTRACT—SERVICE/PRIVAT---- — $0.00 - — 06/07/89—i R BROOKES ELECTRIC EMERG REP/THEATRE LITES 8437 00355 04/30/89 001-400-8604-4201 00107 CIP 86-604 -- $165. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 8437 08815 30150 us) $0.00 06/07/89 --J ss 38J 1• • CITY--OF-HERMOSA-BEACH FINANCE-6FA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 15:42:4.9 PAY VENDOWNAME DESCRIPTION FOR 06/13/89 • VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN #1 AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION Nr PAGE 0005 1 DATE 06%08/89 xr INV/REF PO 4 CHK # ' AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ate' R BROOKES ELECTRIC REPAIR THEATRE DIMMERS 8435 00355 001-400-8604-4201 00108 5589206 04/30/89 CIP 86-604 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL***io***************.x********.x•*****a•*x••n****•**.u•a.*.a•*•n*n**.n*.a•*•a. •******* R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES REFUSE LIEN COLLECTIONS ' *1.289.75 02076 001-300-0000-3859 00024 5511.78 06/01/89 /REFUSE LIEN FEE *** VENDOR TOTAL****•xx•******x•*n•*****************•****a•***********•x•n*********•******* • _$511.78 8435 08806 30150 5589.06 06/07/89 07395 30151 +o $0.00 06/08/89 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER :PETTY CASH REIMS/MAY 89 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER --PETTY • CASH REIM/MAY- 89 - - R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH REIM/MAY 89 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER ---PETTY CASH REIM/MAY-89 --- • R GARY*BRUTSCH; CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH REIM/PLAY 89' • R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER -- ------•PETTY CASH REIM/MAY.89 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH REIM/MAY 89--- - • R • s • r— GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PETTYCASHREIM/MAY-89 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH REIM/MAY 89 - R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER 'PETTY CASH REIM/MAY 89----- R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER . PETTY CASH REIM/MAY 89 • 02016 . 001-400-1121-4315 00048 $12.00 06/01/89-- - - -• CITY CLERK -- •---• /MEMBERSHIP - - ear 1140 0843430152 14r' $0.00 06/08/89 15 02016 001-400-1201-4317 00183 $14.76 08434 30152 , 05/31/89- - - — CITY-MANAGER--/CONFERENCE-EXPENSE $0.00- 06/08/8 r 02016 001-400-1202-4305 00227 $15.07 08434 30152 ,p412 05/31/89 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 06/08/89 02016 001-400-1203-4305 00214 $25.43 05/31/89-- --•- ----- PERSONNEL-----/OFFICE-OPER-SUPPLIES 02016 001-400-1203-4316 00157 $14.95 05/31/89 PERSONNEL /TRAINING 02016 001-400-3103-4309 00846 $7.60 05/31189 - ST- MAINTENANCE- -/MAINTENANCE- MATERIALS --- 02016 001-400-3104-4309 00246 $2.18 05/31/89--- TRAFFIC SAFETY -/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS --- 08434 30152 2,4t 50.00 •---06/08/891 08434 30152 Qu► $0.00 06/08/89 08434 30152 - - $0.00---06/08/89 P. 0 30152 :ems 0%0 06/08/89 02016 001-400-4601-4308 00174 $48.35 08434 30152 ;,,41P 05/31/89-- COMM-RESOURCES—/PROGRAM-MATERIALS *0.00-06/08/89 02016 001-400-6101-4309 00696• $2.49 08434 30152 -iM 05/31/89- PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 06/08/89 02016 110-400-3302-4305 00573 $0.25 08434 30152 „V 05/31-/89— --- --------PARKING-ENF--/OFFICE-OPER -SUPPLIES $0.00-06/08/87 8434 30152 02016 110-400-3302-4310 00091 $25.76 05/31/89 PARKING ENF - • /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 0 $0.00 06/08/89 ` 7- :. .114 • • • • • • FINANCE-SFA340. TIME 15:42:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ITY-OF-HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/13/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************aria******************w•p*****•**•*••x•********************* R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. INC. MEDIAN$ MAINT/MAY 89 - R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE... INC. PARKS MAINT/MAY 89 00599 001-400-3101-4201 -- ---- 05/31/89 - - -- MEDIANS - 00599 001-400-6101-4201 05/31/89 PARKS INV/REF .6168. 54 00016 $3.000.00 !CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00143 69.539.03 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR.TOTAL******************************************************************** 612.539.03 • R CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION PUBLICATIONS/BLDG 4 • PAGE 0006 DATE 06/08/89 PO # CHK #' AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP <"J 02863 001-400-4201-4305 00449 64.20 05/18/89 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • R CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE STAMP/NAMEPLATE 24528 64. 20 00262 001-400-1131-4305 00107 05/17/89 CITY ATTORNEY 629.97 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************************x•************** R CALIFORNIA WATER.SERVICE WATER BILLINGS/MAY 89 • R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE • WATER BILLINGS/MAY 89---- R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLINGS/MAY 89 - 629. 97 00016 001-400-3101-4303 05/31/89 00016 05/31/89 -- 00016 05/31/89 - MEDIANS 001-400-4204-4303 -- -- -BLDG MA 001-400-6101-4303 PARKS 00042 $1.027.09 /UTILITIES 00312 9521.73 INT ---FUTILITIES " 00255 $3.019.43 - -- /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R • CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC:CHGS/MAY 89 64, 568. 25 00061 30153 90.00 06/08/89 1 9 00061 30153 60.00 06/08/89 07542 30154 60.00 06/07/89 24528 04596 '.t 30155 . . 60.00 06/07/89 00059 30156 90.00 06/08/89 00059 30156 60.00-06/08/8 00059 30156 90.00 06/08/89 00014 001-400-2101-4311 05/31/89 POLICE 00677 9316.78 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************•********************* • R CHANDLER'S. PV READY MIX MISC CHCS/MAY 89 9316. 78 00009 105-400-8202-4309 00060 6378.85 05/31/89 CIP 85-202 - - -/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00512 30157 90.00 06/08/89 21 •J 32 __--]00513 30158 24'3 90.00 06/08/89 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:42:49' , PAY YENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION * * * CITY-OF-HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/13/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4 AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R CHANDLER'S PV READY MIX MISC CHCS/MAY 89 PAGE 0/89 111111' DATE 06/08/89 2'. INV/REF PO it CHK $ AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00009 105-400-8203-4309 00029 $353..35 05/31/89 CIP 85-203 - /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS VENDOR TOTAL********************************•ax•*a•********** ******+t****a••n***a•x•*** R LORIE*CHAYKOWSKI • $732.20 02848 001-210-0000-2110 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 74700 06/01/89 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • 02916 $100.00 74700 R CITY & COUNTY ENGINEER'S ASSOC MEMBERSHIP/A. ANTICH $100.00 00039 001-400-4202-4315 00039 $7.00 05/16/89 PUB WKS ADMIN -- /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *7. 00 • R COAST GLASS COMPANY MISC CHGS/MAY 89 00325 001-400-4204-4309 01329 $24.23 05/31/89- BLDG MAINT - -- /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R COLICH & SONS PROGRESS PMT 3/CIA 405 3 R COLICH & SONS -- -•PROG PMTS 1-2/CIP 405----1/2 02294 05/24/89 02294 05/24/89- $24. 23 160-400-8405-4201 00027 $136.989.00 CIP 85-405 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 160-400-8405-4201 00028 $128,858.40 — CIP 85-405---/CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT— - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $265.847.40 R COMMAND DATA SYSTEMS --SOFTWARE MAINT TAXES R COMMAND DATA SYSTEMS SOFTWARE MAINT/JAN-JUN 02462 001-400-2101-4201 05/25/89 POLICE 00384 $944.20 /CONTRACT---SERVICE/PRIVAT--- 02462 001-400-2101-4201 90225 02/22/89 - POLICE 00386 $1.079.91 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2.024.11 IVAT 00513 30158 $0.00 06/08/89 08429 30159 1,9 $0.00 06/08/89 12 - 11 08816 30160 $0.00 06/07/89 s 00514 30161 I , $0.00 06/08/89 3 08828 30162 $0.00 06/08/89 1/2 08824 30162 --$000---06/08/89 11 24 08915 30163 „ -- $0.00 - -- 06/07/89 1 79 890225 08916 30163 $0.00 06/08/89 R VIKI *COPELAND COLORED 8LIRES/BUDGET • 00041 001-400-1202-4305 00228 $59.64 - 06/01/89 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1 07390 30164 $0.00 06/08/89 32 32 • -I 34 • • FINANCE-dFA340. TIME 15:42:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY-OF-HERMOSA--BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/13/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MARK 0. *CRAIG ANIMAL. TRAP REFUND/TWO --76442 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 02847 001-210-0000-2110 --06/01/89 - PAGE 0008 I'- DATE 06/08/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP , J • $59.64 02913 $100.00 76442 08431 30165 - -/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 06/08/89" R R R $100. 00 THE*DAILY BREEZE 00642 001-400-1203-4201 00494 $96.60 392205-100 EMPLOYEE ADVERTISING- ---5-100------05/18/89------ - PERSONNEL----/CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT -- .. THE*DAILY BREEZE EMPLOYEE ADVERTISING THE*DAILY BREEZE EMPLOYEE ADVERTISING --• - 00642 . 5-100 • 05/18/89 001-400-1203-4201 00495 $101.20 392205-100 PERSONNEL --/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00642 001-400-1203-4201 00496 $82.80 392205-100 05/18/89------------ - - PERSONNEL- --------- /CONTRACT -SERVICE/PRIVAT - - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * $280.60 R DATA SAFE 00156 001-400-1206-4201 00556 $193.75 42676 TAPE STORAGE/APR-MAY 89--42676-- ---05/22/89 ----- - DATA PROCESSING--/CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT - VENDOR TOTAL,******************************************************************** IS $193.75 ,o 1' 08263 30166 $0.00 06/07/89 08256 30166 $0.00 06/07/89 08242 30166 $82.80 06/07/891 00047 $0.00 30167 06/08/89 - I R DE LORNE CHEVROLET. INC. 02854 001-400-2101-5403 00004 $13.299.08 08917 30168 :., -- -POLICE MINI -VAN ---------- ------------06/06/89----------- "--- ---- POLICE------ /VEHICLES-=— ------------ -- $0. 00 - 06/07/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL.****a****a•********************************************************** $13.299.08 R DICTAPHONE. INC. 02855 001-400-2101-4305 01012 - - - RECORDING -TAPES - -------36886------05/01 /89--- - --- --• -POLICE --- ' --- $930. 50 M836886 07987 30169 :, /OFFICE- OPER-SUPPLIES --- ---- - --- $0. 00—•06/07/89 7 Pa . *** VENDOR TOTAL,*********•►********************************************************** R LAURIE*DUKE _ 'REIMB NOTARY -.EXPENSES ------ $930. 50 00955 001-400-1101-4305 00247 $27.00 --06/06/89--------- -" - - CITY COUNCIL----/OFFICE-OPER-SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R DUNCAN INDUSTRIES PARKING METER PARTS $27.00 1, ;5 06696 30170 -$0. 00- - 06/07/89 1 01184 110-400-3302-4309 00548 $1.095.45 P-005609-0 07873 30171 609-0------05/10/89 PARKING-ENF /MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS---- $1:056.65--06/67/89— r • CITY OF-HERMOSA-BEACH FINANCE-SFA340• DEMAND LIST PAGE 0;0;1' TIME 15:42:49 FOR 06/13/89 DATE 06)08/89 :d • PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP .ad *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,095.45 R EASTMAN, INC. 02514 001-400-1202-4305 00226 $221.22 4905493 07387 30172 d CHAIR MATS/FINANCE • ---- 05493------05/23/89 FINANCE -ADMIN - /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 06/07/89 • R EASTMAN, INC. 02514 001-400-1202-5401 00001 $111.81 4894371 07388 30172 , 7r DATA TRAY/FINANCE 94371 05/19/89 FINANCE ADMIN /EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $50 $0.00 06/07/89 *** VENDOR. TOTAL******************************************************************** 4333.03 ,:r R EASY READER 00181 • 001-400-1121-4323 00063 $829.60 0268 04597 30173 r PUBLIC NOTICING/APR 89 -- 0268 -- 04/30/89 CITY CLERK --/PUBLIC NOTICING $0.00 06/08/89 ,s R EASY READER 00181 001-400-1203-4201 00498 $56.25 9033 08243 30173 1c." -EMPLOYEE ADVERTISING- -9033 05/30/89---------- --PERSONNEL- ----/CONTRACT -SERVICE/PRIVAT ----- $56.80 - 06/07/89- R EASY READER 00181 001-400-1203-4201 00499 $32.63 9033 08254 30173 ojeF . EMPLOYEE ADS 9033 05/30/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $32.63 06/07/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $918.48 R EL CAMINO COLLEGE�, 01469 001-400-2101-4316 00382 $2.50 7072 08600 30174 MOTORCYCLE CLASS%RICKEY 7.072 04/18/89 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 06/07/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************************************at•******* $2.50 R ELECTROAPPLIANCE REFINISHING 02611 001-400-4101-5401 00011 $110.00 REFINISH OFC FURN/PLAN. - X5065- --- 05/18/89 - PLANNING --/EQUIP-LESS THAN $500 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • R • FRANK'S.CARBURETORS REBUILT CARBURETOR $110. 00 5065 08601 $0.00 30175 06/07/89 01095 001-400-4205-4311 00135 $45.80 6275 08138 30176 6275 03/23/89 EQUIP SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $45.79 06/08/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $45.80 d MP :9 r , 31 71.1 OP R FREEWAY STORES • 02853 001-400-1121-5401 00001 $255.55 TC32045 04594 30177 „r TRANSCRIBIN0.MACHINE- 32045 06/06/89 CITY CLERK /EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 $0.00 06/08/89 N v 1:1"-T • FINANCE-$FA340 TIME 15:42:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION • • -CITY OF-HERMOSA-BEACH ' DEMAND LIST FOR 06/13/89 VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GANDALF DATA. INC. 01432 MODEM MAINT/4TH QTR 89 - 25307---- 05/22/89 4255.55 001-400-1206-4201 00557 $492.00 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * R GATES MC DONALD REIMB LIAR/MAY1-11.-89 - $492. 00 3 PAGE 0010 DATE 06/08/89 PO 4 CHK $ ' AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP e 25307 00019 30178 $0.00 06/08/89 9 02538 705-400-1217-4182 00101 $20.392.43 -----06/05/89------- ----WORKERS-COMP----/WORKERS-COMP CURRENT--YR--.-- VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY 00058 --MISC CHGS/MAY 89 - - --- ---05/31/89--- R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY MISC CHCS/MAY 89 $20.392.43 105-400-2601-4309 00488 $99.49 -------- STREET -LIGHTING -/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00058 105-400-8202-4309 00059 $165.50 05/31/89 CIP 85-202 - -/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GENERAL TELEPHONF COMPANY. TELE CHCS/MAY 09 • R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY ---TELE -TELE CHGS/MAY--89 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/MAY 89 00015 05/31/89 4264.99 001-400-1101-4304 00220 410.06 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1122-4304 00036 $26.92 05/31/89 - ELECTIONS -•-----/-TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00141 $14.88 05/31/89 CITY ATTORNEY ----/TELEPHONE R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 00015 --TELE CHCS/MAY 89 -05/31/89 R • GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 'TELE CHCS/MAY 89 R . GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY -------- ---=TELE-CHGS/MAY- 89 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAY 89 001-400-1141-4304 00219 $20.11 CI TY- TREASURER -/TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00234 $22.87 -05/31/89 - CITY MANAGER -/TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00239 $84.08 05/31/89- ----- FINANCE -ADMIN -/TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00237 435.24 05/31/89 PERSONNEL - /TELEPHONE w ry 08266 30179 1,' *0. 00 06/08/89 --] n 00524 30180 $0. 00 1. 06/08/89 00524 30180 1 $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 $0.00-06/08/89 --1 0.00-06/08/891 00525 30182 $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 ,z - 40. 00 -06/08/89- 00525 -06/08/89- 00525 30182 M1� J $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 $0.00-06/08/89 3 00525 30182 ,. $0.00 06/08/89 - :z J FINANCE-SFA340' TIME 15:42:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R R R R R R R R R R R R • GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELECHGS/MAY 89 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/MAY 89 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/MAY 89 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE. CHGS/MAY 89 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/MAY 89 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/MAY 89 GENERAL TELEPHONE. COMPANY TELE CHGS/MAY 89 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/MAY 89 • GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/MAY 89 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/MAY 89 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/MAY 89. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/MAY 89 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/MAY 89 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/MAY 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/13/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00163 $212.,00 05/31/89 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00130 $30.36 05/31/89 BUS LICENSE - /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00379 $728.19 05/31/89 POLICE /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00172 $205.67 05/31/89 FIRE - /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00224 $114.30 05/31/89 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00240 $60.09 05/31/89 PLANNING - /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00235 $106.48 05/31/89 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 00015 '001-400-4202-4304 00240 $240.•17 05/31/89 PUB WKS ADMIt4 - /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4204-4321 00446 $18.17 05/31/89 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00275 $217.92 05/31/89 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00147 $11.29 05/31/89 PARKS /TELEPHONE 00015 110-400-3301-4304 00111 $10.77 05/31/89-- VEH PKG DIST -- /TELEPHONE 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00239 $273.20 05/31/89 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE 00015 145-400-3401-4304 00032 $4.16 05/31/89 - DIAL A RIDE----- -/TELEPHONE PAGE 0011 DATE 06/08/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2.446.93 00525 30182 $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 $0.00 06/08/89 00525 30182 $0.00 06/08/89 R GOODHEW AMBULANCE SERVICE 01910 001-400-2101-4201 00383 $510.27 001-959511-000 08902 PRIS EMERG SERV/POLICE 1-000 -- 04/23/89 POLICE ----------/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 30183 06/07/89 40. 1 + + 0 0 • lP ;� -. a�4 •.'�r�E1 p� pY � ,vr-,','1�IUt"+i. „t r • FINANCE4FA340 TIME 15: 42:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY—OF-HERMOSA—BEACH ' DEMAND LIST FOR 06/13/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0012 DATE 06/08/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GTEL MOVE EQUIP/POLICE --- -----16712 01340 05/07/89 .$510. 27 001-400-2101-4304 00380 $450.48 _ .__. _ POLICE-- - ----- --/TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************►************************************************** R HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 02102 001-210-0000-2110 EN0•SER/21ST ST VACATION 90106-----04/12/89 R HARRIS & ASSOCIATES ENG SERV/MAR 89 $450.48 EA16712 08707 30184 $500.00 06/08/89 'j 02912 $1.528.94 880590106 08187 30185 ---/DEPOSITS/WORK-GUARANTEE $0.00 06/08/89 02102 160-400-8406-4201 00020 $11.968.86 880720103 20103 04/12/89 - CIP 86-405 ------/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • R STEVE*HARTT MILES/"SIDS" CLASS $13.497.80 00896 001-400-2101-4312 05/15/89 POLICE 00946 $11.96 --- /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $11.96 08197 30185 $0.00 06/08/89 08903 30186 $0.00 06/08/89 R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY 00149 001-400-1206-4201 00552 $3,642.30 7,108643 07833 HPSPELL/WORD PROCESSING 08643 04/07/89 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $3.642.30 R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY 00149 LASERJET PRNTR/PERSONNEL—N8030- 06/01/89 * * * 001-400-1206-5402 00006 $1.578.60 7LN8030 07870 30187 06/08/89 fi 9 11) tF 30187 ,. DATA-PROCESSING—iEQUIP—MORE-THAN-$500 ---- --$1.578.60--06/08/89 VENDOR.TOTAL******************************************************************** R KIM PAGE*HODGES DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND ------69853 02689 001-210-0000-2110 06/01/89__-- $5.220. 90 02914 $100.00 69853 08427 30188 m ---/DEPOSITS/WORK-GUARANTEE------- $0.00 06/08/89' m *** VENQOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R • HOZIES:RADIATOR , RECORE RADIATOR R HOZIES'RADIATOR RADIATOR RECORE $100.00 SERVICE 00277 001-400-2101-4311 00675 $146.97 —95855------05/24/89 POLICE /AUTO -•MAINTENANCE SERVICE '. 00277 001-400-3104-4311 00023 93297 05/11/89 TRAFFIC SAFETY • $146.97 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 95855 08913 30189 $0.00-06/07/89 1 0.00'--06/07/891 no 93297 08809 30189 s.`'/ $0.00 06/08/89 3s y,J 1 FINANCE-SFA34O. • TINE 15:42:49 PAY VENDOR.NAME DESCRIPTION CITY-OF-HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/13/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0013 ' DATE 06/08/89 2411 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP .40 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R HYATT REGENCY/SACRAMENTO HOTEL ADV/J. ROSENBERGER TR250 .$293.94 02864 001-400-1101-4317 00321 $96.80 --05/31/89-- --- CITY COUNCIL -------/CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************•************************************************** $96.80 R HYATT REGENCY/SACRAMENTO 02865 001-400-1101-4317 00318 $96.20 --HOTEL-ADV/J:--WILLIAMS---TR2949-----05/31/89----------CITY--COUNCIL /CONFERENCE -EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $96.80 TR250 00250 TR249 7 01 30190 d $0.00 06/07/89 --i yr It „ 00249 30191 ,2r $0. 00 -_. 06/07/89 1 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC • 02458 001-400-4204-4309 01325 $335.48 29202 08118 - BUILDING LAMPS ---------29202------05/03/89------------ BLDG- MAINT —/MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS ----------- $335.47 • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $335.48 R JOBS AVAILABLE • 01165 001-400-1203-4201 00500 $79.00 89-10-048 EMPLOYEE ADVERTISING --0-048-------05/09/99--------------- -PERSONNEL ----/CONTRACT--SERVICE/PRIVAT-------- *** VENDOR TOTAL•******************************************************************** * * * R RICHARD M.*KNUTSEN -REIMB TOWING FEES R RICHARD,M.*KNUTSEN REIMB TOWING FEES $79. 00 30192 Ob/OS/B9 08255 30193 $0.00 --- 06/08/89 r 14 a 1.3 1 02872 001-300-0000-3841 00185 $35.00 08596 30194 24W 05/11/89-- ...-.. _.-....._ - —----1POLICE-TOWING---------------------- $0.00-----06/08/89-, 02872 110-400-3302-4201 00208 $70.00 05/11/89- PARKING ENF --/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • R MICHAEL*LADD COMP CONS/APR 89 0R019 $105. 00 08596 30194 ;5» $0.00 06/08/89 01978 001-400-1206-4201 00553 $757.12 NBRO19 08720 05/01/89 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $757.12 R LEAGUE'OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 00317 001-400-1101-4317 00320 $125.00 REG ADV/J. WILLIAMS -- - TR249 -- 05/31/89 CITY COUNCIL --- /CONFERENCE EXPENSE • 30195 n460 $0.00 06/08/89 40 72 TR249 00249 I" 30196 „15. $0.00 06/07/89 IS 40 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:42:49 CITY OF HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/13/89 PAGE 0014 DATE 06/08/89 PAY VENDOR NAME VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK 0 •' DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 00317 001-400-1101-4317 00323 $125..00 TR250 00250 30196 —I REG ADV/J. ROSENBERGER TR250 05/31/89 CITY COUNCIL /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 06/07/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL.*********************************x********************************** $250.00 R LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 00842 001-400-4201-4305 00450 $2.50 10449 07541 30197 to PUBLICATIONS 10449 05/09/89 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 06/08/89 *** VENDOR.TOTAL***********************************r*******n************************ $2.50 R PAUL E.*LEWKOWICZ 02619 001-400-4601-4201 00340 $77.50 07783 30198 THEATRE TECH/5-17/18,89 05/23/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/08/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $77.50 R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. 01320 110-400-3302-4187 00183 UNIFORMS/NEW GS HIRES 23311 04/13/89 „ .S $723.24 23311 07874 30199 PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $723.24 06/08/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** :0723.24 R CAROL*LOPILATO 02871 110-300-0000-3302 27691 $46.00 636424 08734 30200 CITE PAYMENT REFUND 36424 06/01/89 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 06/07/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $46.00 24 - R LOS ANGELES CO DISTRICT ATTY 00386 001-400-1131-4251 00084 $156.74 1-11 07543 30201 LEGAL SERV/JAN 89 1-11 08/12/89 CITY ATTORNEY• ---/CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT - $0.00 06/08/89 it** VENDOR TOTAL**************+t***************************************************** $156.74 R -LOS ANGELES COUNTY 1-IAZ MATERIALS PERMIT 02648 001-400-4202-4251 00011 $157.00 08834 30202 05/31/89 PUD WKS ADMIN - /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LOS ANGELES TIMES EMPLOYEE ADS -11347 $157.00 $0.00 06/08/89 :8 00213 001-400-1203-4201 00501 $302.76 17-011347 08225 30203 134 04/30/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $302.76 06/08/89 35 36 r FINANCE-SFA340.: TIME 15:42:49 • PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF-HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/13/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R LOS ANGELES TIMES EMPLOYEE ADS 11347 R LOS ANGELES TIMES EMPLOYEE ADS -- 11347 R LOS ANGELES TIMES EMPLOYEE ADVERTISING 11199 INV/REF AMOUNT • 00213 001-400-1203-4201 00502 04/30/89 PERSONNEL 00213 001-400-1203-4201 00503 04/30/89 PERSONNEL --- 00213 --- 00213 001-400-1203-4201 00504 05/28/89 PERSONNEL 4302.76 17-011347 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT • 4220.53 17-011347 -/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 4290.29 21-011199 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR:TOTAL*******************#**aa******************************************** R LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. MISC CHGS/MAY 89 41. 116.33 00079 001-400-2101-4187 00254 4249.16 05/31/89 POLICE --- -. ---/UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4249.16 • R MAIN ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. MISC CHGS/MAY 89 00426 105-400-8203-4309 00028 4886.12 05/31/89 CIP 85-203 --/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4886.12 R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES. INC. LEASE PMT DUE ON ACCEPT. 02272 001-400-2101-6900 06/01/89 POLICE 00427 49, 335. 36 /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MC. MASTER=CARR SUPPLY CO. THERMOMETERS 49, 335. 36 r PAGE 0015 DATE 06/08/89 PO # CHK # UNENC DATE EXP 08231 4302.76 30203 06/08/89 08257 30203 *0.00 06/08/89 08264 30203 40.00 06/08/89 r N'el i1 Itl v u yof 00534 30204 4 40.00 06/08/89 s� 00535 $0.00 00065 40. 00 00728 001-400-4204-4309 01326 497.01 05/15/89 -- BLDG MAINT -- --•.- /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ;MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION MISC CHGS/APRIL 89 R • MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION .---.MISC-CHCS/APRIL 89 *** VENDOR TOTAL • 497.01 00388 001-400-2101-4310 00185 4210.87 --04/30/89 POLICE..... -/MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 00388 110-400-3302-4310 00092 478.81 04/30/89--- ----- PARKING-ENF :MOTOR -FUELS AND -LUBES R MOHLE, GROVER•:& ASSOCIATES' 01499 -. ENG SERV/TRAFF-SIGS — 8.9 5704/04/89 4289.68 .e ill 0 30205 '1# 06/08/89 30206 : ,'". 06/08/89 08104 498.85 30207 06/08/89 00462 30208 :C wo 40.00 06/08/89 ' 00462 30208 5;'O 80:00-- 06/08/89- 9) 1 150-400-8138-4201 00043 44,260.50 CIP-85--138 .---;CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT u 89-57 08195 30209 30~ --• 40.00 --- 06/08/89 IP ., 4V FINANCE-SFA34Q TIME 15:42:49 PAY VENDOR.NAME DESCRIPTION -J • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -- DEMAND LIST PAGE 0016 w FOR 06/13/89 DATE 06708/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • *** VENDOR TOTAL•*******************************•************************************* $4.260.50 R MONARCH BROOM 00084 001-400-3103-4309 00845 $1.026.66 00538 30210 MISC CHCS/MAY 89 05/31/89-- ST MAINTENANCE -/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 06/08/89 'I }w *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.026.66 i„ 11 R MOORE BUSINESS FORMS 00423 001-400-1203-4305 00213 $60._22 51898975 08259 30211 . JOB, INTEREST CARDS - --.98975 --- ---- 04/25/89---- -- -- -- PERSONNEL---------/OFFICE-OPER 'SUPPLIES -'- $0.00 06/08/B9 13 I .*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $60.22 14 t3 R NORTHROP RECREATION CLUB 02846 001-210-0000-2110 02918 $100.00 76960 08432 30212 tt DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 76960 06/01/89 - - - ---/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE-- •-' -$0.00 - 06/08/89-i *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100. 00 I ,' R MERRY C.*O'CONNELL 02849 001-210-0000-2110 02915 $50.•00 75335 84029 30213 ANIMAL -TRAP REFUND ---- 75335 -- 06/01/89 - - - - /DEPOSITS/WORK-GUARANTEE---- -- - $0.00 ..- 06/08/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL.******************************************************************** $50.00 R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE 00321 001-400-2101-4304 00381 $162.55 00036 30214 COMP-HOOKUP/MAY 89 ------------05/31/89----------•-- POLICE--- /TELEPHONE= *** VENDOR TOTAL.******************************************************************** $162.55 $0. 00— 06/08/89 R MS VICKI L.*PETERSON 02861 110-300-0000-3302 27692 $46.00 105174 08722 30215 /COURT-FINES/PARKING--------- - — $0. 00 -- 06/07/89 al -CITE PMT REFUND - --05174 —05/16/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL,******************************************************************** $46. 00 L R POWER SYSTEMS _ 02557 001-400-2701-4309 00042 $282.00 I32181 08585 30216 _ --CHECK DIESEL GENERATOR- :-32181------05/19/89----- •-- CIVIL-DEFENSE—fMAINTENANCE MATERIALS $53.00 •- 06/08/89 13 *** VENDOR TOTAL***************sE**i't************************************************* $282. 00 .4 R RADIO SHACK.. 01429 001-400-2101-4305 01015 $38.13 00543 30217 IL -- MISC CHCS/MAY--89- 05/31 -/89 ---------POLICE /OFFICE -OPER -SUPPLIES $0.00-06/08/89- FINANCE-SFA340. TIME 15:42:49: PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R RADIO SHACK MISC GHGS/MAY 89 R RADIO SHACK MISC•CHGS/MAY 89 CITY OF HERMOSA-BEACH-- DEMAND LIST PAGE 0017 1 FOR 06/13/89 DATE 06/08/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 01429 001-400-2101-4311 00676 815:92 05/31/89 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 01429 105-400-2601-4309 00487 • $4.54 05/31/89 INV/REF STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************;*************************************************** R RADIOCALL SERVICE & SYSTEMS PAGERS/FIRE DEPT -• -- - 6372 00103 001-400-2201-5401 00007 06/06/89 --- - FIRE- — - $58.59 PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00543 30217 $0.00 06/08/89 00543 30217 $0.00 06/08/89 J ;.J $266.25 6372 08914 30218 -iEQUIP-LESS --THAN -$500-- - ----- - $0.00 06/07/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL********a*********************************************************** $266.25 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO 00173 001-400-2201-5401 00008 $133.13 H47544. 08311 30219 ,8‘-1 BINOCULARS/FIRE. - -- 47544----- --05/25/89 FIRE- ------ ----/EQUIP-LESS-•THAN $500 - - -- $133.13 - 06/08/89—i • I ,tv *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $133.13 R RANCHO SANTIAGO COMM. TUITION/J. PELKA COLLEGE 01957 '001-400-2101-4312 00947 $2.50 — -05/02/89-- - - -- - - POLICE-- ..------/TRAVEL-EXPENSE -r POST R RANCHO SANTIAGO .COMM. COLLEGE TUITION/S. HARTT 01957 001-400-2101-4312 00948 05/02/89 POLICE $2.50 /TRAVEL EXPENSE POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R READICARE MEDICAL GROUP -LAX PRE -EMP PHYSICALS/APR 89 23484 - $5.00 02390 001-400-1203-4320 00256 $828.00 05/05/89- • - PERSONNEL ----- /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R : REDONDO BEACH NEWS. INC. EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING *** R _r $828.00 08573 30220 $0.00 06/08/89 -1 08577 30220 $0.00 06/08/89 94-23484 08260 30221 $0.00 06/08/89 02858 001-400-1203-4201 00497 $30.00 05/24/89 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT VENDOR TOTAL.******************************************************************** AWARDS*REX_ GROUP TOURNAMENT MEDALS $30.00 OI OI 08262 30222 •,1111 $0.00 06/07/89 00100 001-400-4601-4308 00171 $136.32 12778 05/16/89 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS 12778 07768 30223 $136.32 06/08/89 OI 71 11� 1f r 'o d • FINANCE-SFA340• - TIME 15:42:49 PAY VENDOR.NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA -BEACH- DEMAND LIST FOR 06/13/89 PAGE 0018 DATE 06%08/89 2 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL****************a*************************************************** R RG SILKSCREEN SUMMER_PROG T-SHIRTS. R RG SILKSCREEN SUMMER PROGRAM SHIRTS 02862 001-400-4601-4305 00678 — 05/18/89-- COMM RESOURCES 02862 001-400-4601-4308 00175 05/18/89 COMM RESOURCES $136.32 $130.19 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $130.20 /PROGRAM MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************************+ter************** R RICHTER GROUP COMM CONSULTING SERVICE 639 02856 . 001-400-2101-4201 05/09/89 POLICE _$260.39 00385 $3,500.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JEFFREY*RISSE PARKING PERMIT REFUND 41034 • 02857 110-300-0000-3843 05/31/89 $3.500.00 06266 $25.00 /PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL *** VENDOR TOTAL **********************#********************** #********************** R ROBBINS.PRECAST. INC. TRASH RECEPTACLES "' 267 • • $25.00 01864 001-400-3103-5401 00002 $3.886.19 05/30/89 ST MAINTENANCE /EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DWAIN*ROQUE • SPR PROD INSTRUCTOR $3.886.19 07779 30224 $0.00 06/07/89 07779 30224 $0.00 06/08/89 639 08595 30225 $0.00 06/07/89 41034 08728 30226 $0.00 06/07/89 267 08132 30227 $3.886.19 06/08/89 02859 001-400-4601-4201 00339 $216.00 05/01/89 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PATRICK*ROSSETTI ST LITE ASSMNT SERV R PATRICK*ROSSETTI - -•CR GD ASSMNT,SERV $216.00 00301 105-400-2601-4201 00032 $7.000.00 05/01/89 STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 3 07764 30228 --] $0.00 06/07/89 08192 30229 $0.00 06/08/89 00301 155-400-2102-4201 00052 $2.000.00 08192 05/01/89--- -- - CROSSING -GUARD —/CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT— - — --$0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES ------ -- - ENG SERV/SLURRY--SEAL 01578 115-400-8170-4201 00022 89219--05/01-/89 CIP 87-170 $9.000.00 30229 06/08/89 1 $650.00 89219 08819 30230 39 CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT----- $0.00-06/08/89 1 _ J f-' Inv FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:42:49 " PAY VENDOR•NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/13/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY STREET.SIGNS. PAGE 0019 DATE 06/08/89 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 4650.00 1 00021 001-400-3104-5499 00007 *1.879.73 33590 08165 30231 33590 05/31/89 - TRAFFIC SAFETY--/NON-CAPITALIZED ASSETS *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************#************************************************** $1.879.73 R SUSAN*SAXE-CLIFFORD.PH D 00839 001-400-1203-4320 00257 4275.00 9-0524-3 PSYCH EVALUATIONS --- --'524-3 - -• 05/24/89----- -- ---- - PERSONNEL -------/PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS------ --- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $275.00 R SCCCA 02852 001-400-1122-4316 00012 $50.00 REG/L. RIDDLE/MIpSTOKKE---------- 05/25/89----- - ------ ELECTIONS-- /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ALLAN*SCHER --- REIMS TOWING FEES - - --- R ALLAN*SCHER . REIMS TOWING FEES 02851 001-300-0000-3841 —05/11/89 - --------- $50.00 $0.00 06/08/89 z -J s J a"� 1, 08265 30232 12..0 $0.00 06/08/89 14.41 • 04595 30233 ic`J $0.00 06/08/89. � •9 00186 $35.00 08598 30234 --t—/POLICE-TOWING--------- ------ $0.00 06/08/89 1 02851 110-400-3302-4201 00209 05/11/89 PARKING ENF $45.00 08598 30234 2."1 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/08/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $80.00 R SHERRY GARCIA*SCOTT MEALS/CAL-ID TECH CLASS - 01012 001-400-2101-4316 00383 $36.25 05/18/89-- • -.POLICE - - ----/TRAINING--- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ' SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT BOOKING FEES/FEB 89 R • SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT -- --- ---.TUITION/4-RECRUITS $36.25 • 00151 001-400-2101-4251 10702 05/26/89 POLICE 00151 001-400-2101-4312 05/02/89-------------- POLICE 08910 30235 $0.00 06/08/89 00268 $353.54 10702 00035 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT J '4 30236 $0.00 06/08/09 00949 $1.240.00 61833 08904 30236 •'i /TRAVEL -EXPENSE --r- POST— ---- — $0.00 --- 06/08/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ETTA*SIMPSON'- MON-EXP/MAY-89 • $1.593.54 • 01961 001-400-1101-4317 00324 $30.00 05/31/89 CITY COUNCIL /CONFERENCE -EXPENSE • 11 Ned 06694 30,237 p`d $0.00 ---06/08/89 � tr, 'r FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:42:49: PAY VENDOR:NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/13/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL*****u•a•a•******•x*************•r•a•#****a******************************* R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. MISC CHCS/MAY 89 • *30.00 01399 001-400-4204-4309 01328 $79.13 - 05/31/89-- BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR T6TAL******************************************************************** R R *** R R * * * • • SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY MISC CHCS/MAY 89 - - - - SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY MISC CHCS/MAY 89 *79.13 00114 001-400-2101-4306 00660 $58.82 05/31/89----- - - --- - POLICE ---- /PRISONER -MAINTENANCE 00114 , 001-400-4601-4305 00680 $105.16 05/31/89 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL******4************************************************************* • • SO. CAL SHARPSHOOTER. INC. HOLSTERS/NEW HIRES 45/47 02250 001-400-2101-4187 04/30/89 POLICE SO. CAL SHARPSHOOTER. INC. 02250 001-400-2101-4201 RANGE FEES/JAN-APR '89--- 45/47- ---- 04/30/89-------------- --- -POLICE $163.98 AMOUNT 00252 *376.69 12739/43/45/47 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 00382 $2,780.36 12739/43/45/47 -- /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************aa****************** ti *3,157.05 7 PAGE 0020 DATE 06/08/89 PO # CHK # ' - UNENC DATE EXP 00546 30238 $0.00 06/08/89 ---1 00547 30239 $0.00 06/08/89 00547 30239 „`.) $0.00 06/08/89 R 08906 30240 1•, $0.00 06/07/89 1,1 08906 30240 $0.00 06/07/89 1• R SOURISSEAU SECURITY SYS. INC, 02075 001-400-2101-4201 00387 $1.080.00 1273/71/39/72 08901 30241 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATING 39/72 -- •--05/15/89--- ------ .- -. •- POLICE ---•- ---- /CONTRACT- SERVICE/PR IVAT-- -------- $0.00 -- 06/08/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.080.00 , * * * R 7 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 110-300-0000-3302 27693 $14,628.00 07396 30242 - CITE SURCHARGE/MAY- 89 --.---------.--06/01/89--- ---- ----------------/COURT-FINES/PARKING - - - — $0.00- 06/08/89—i VENDOR TOTAL**********4********************************************************* *14.628.00 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00400 110-300-0000-3302 27694 $172.00 CITE COURT BAIL ------•--------------•O5/25/89-_----------------------- ---/COURT--FINES/PARKING — *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************•#********************************************* $172.00 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS •-MISC -CHCS/APR --89 00018 001-400-2201-4309 00693 04/30/89--- -- --FIRE 08727 30243 `2 - $0.00 --06/08/89— J J ,�J $20.77 00451 30244 ,, /MAINTENANCE MATER IALS ----------- $0.00---06/08/89 ---06/08/89 FINANCE-SFA340: TIME 15:42:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION .CITY-•OF-HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST . FOR 06/13/89 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE 8/81 DATE 06/08/89 111 INV/REF PO # CHK. # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC•CHGS/APR 89 • R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHCS/APR 89 00018 001-400-3103-4309 00847 04/30/89 ST MAINTENANCE 00018 105-400-2601-4309 00486 ---- 04/30/89-- - STREET LIGHTING $13.50 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $13.50 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR. TOTAL_*****************************rt*************************************tat R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. -------GAS-BILLINGS/MAY--89 $47.77 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00313 $403.3.5 05/31/89----- BLDG MAINT /UTILI-TIES *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************I************************************************** $403.35 R SOUTHWEST REGIONAL TRNG CENTER 00884 001-400-2101-4313 00205 TUITION/A. ALTFEL'D -05/18/89- POLICE 00451 3024 $0.00 06/08/89 00451 30244 $0.00 06/08/89- 1 00553 30245 $0.00 06/08/89 1 *263. 00 08909 /TRAVEL -EXPENSE,' -STC---------- ---$0. 00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP: --- --- - - WATER- COOLER RENT/APR 89 41516--- $263. 00 00146 001-400-4601-4305 00681 $36.90 0441516 00033 --04/30/89 - - COMM RESOURCE$ --/OFFICE-OPER-SUPPLIES- ----- $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL:**************ai***************************************************** • * * * $36.90 1 2• 3 J 5 s`1 9 ,Ov 11 12 ,5 N ,5 J ./ 30246 • ,s`i -06/08/891 30247 06/08/89 q-.1 ,9 2,✓ :? 73 R STATE OF CALIFORNIA 00364 001-400-2101-4251 00267 $37.00 869087 00023 30248 -FINGERPRINT-APP8/APR-89--69087-------05/12/89----------------POLICE- /CONTRACT-SFpRVICE/GOVT --- ---- $0.00--06/08/89 VENDOR TOTAL:******************************************************************** R STONEDGE TECH SOFTWARE SUPP/1989-------- 24-5. *37. 00 02518 001-400-1206-4201 00554 $100.00 89-03-24-5 08709 03/24/89- — - DATA PROCESSING- /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT----------- -$0.00- *** VENDOR TOTAL:**5F***************************************************************** R SUN BADGE COMPARY - MISC-CHCS/MAY- 89 *100. 00 00806 001-400-2101-4187 00253 $24.44 05/31/89-- - --POLICE -!UNIFORM-ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SUPERIOR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT MISC CHGS/MAY-89 $24.44 00425 001-400-2201-4309 00694 $21.00 —05/31/89 FIRE /MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS x 30249 06/08/89---1 ,n J 5, 00554 30250 :: *0.00-06/08/89 --] 13 14 00555 30251 m's *0.00- --06/08/(39 --I 0.00----06/08/89 'rd • I • • FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:42:49 •• • CITY OF HERMOSA—BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0022 .221 FOR 06/13/89 DATE 06/.08/89 2 PAY VENDOR.NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO $ CHK # 'j, DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP . *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *21.00 if tr t R SUPREME SALES CO., INC. 00494 001-400-2101-4306 00659 $33.46 70776 08552 30252 DISPOSABLE TOOTHBRUSHES/ 70776 - 05/09/89 - POLICE ---------/PRISONER MAINTENANCE $35.00 06/08/89-'1 9 Ito *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *33. 46 1 0 ti R SURF CARPET CARE - 01075 001-400-4204-4309 01327 $85.00 08193 30253 xt --CLEAN POLICE DEPT CARPET-------- ---05/04/89---- ---- --- BLDG-MAINT--- /MAINTENANCE—MATERIALS-- - $0.00 06/08/89-1 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *85. 00 to R TEXTILE RESOURCES 02825 001-400-4601-4308 00173 $62.01 4707 07776 30254 .t-, SUMMER PROG SUPP/COMM RE ---4707------05/23/89---- -- — --COMM RESOURCES—/PROGRAM MATERIALS $62.01 06/08/89 1t. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *62.01 ,1 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 00124 001-400-3101-4309 00027 $10.87 05157 30255 :1 MISC-CHCS/MAY-89 • 05/31/89 — — MEDIANS--- . /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS — — $0.00 06/08/89 t. 00124 001-400-6101-4309 00698 $52.36 05157 30255 .. 05/31/89 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 06/08/89 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY • MISC CHCS/MAY $9 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $63.23 R TOPD.PIPE AND SUPPLY 02221 001-400-3101-4309 00026 $313.93 00557 30256 MISC CHGS/MAY 89 -05/31/89 - MEDIANS - - -•--/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 06/08/89 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $313.93 • R • TOYS R US • SUMMER PROGRAM SUPPLIES • 02850 001-400-4601-4308 00172 *193.62 05/18/89 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 07778 30257 $0.00 06/08/89 21 21 ^1 $193.62 21 R UNIFORCE CORPORATION • • 01720 001-400-1206-4201 00555 $660.00 890309 07895 30258 I1. FUEL SYS SUPP/JAN—MAR 89 90309 03/15/89- DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $660.00 06/08/89 - Ntr FINANCE-SFA340. TIME 15:42:49 • PAY VENDOR:NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/13/89 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ' ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******!**4*****************************a**************************** R UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS PUBLICATIONS' J PAGE 0023 DATE 06408/89 of INV/REF PO Si CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP . $660.00 02860 001-400-4601-4305 00679 $34.50 05/25/89-- - COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $34.50 R VASEK POLAK SUBARU 01387 001-400-2401-4311 00148 $399.04 REPAIR CLUTCH/SUBARU ----155.52 - - -- 05/08/89-- - ----- ANIMAL CONTROL--/AUTO-MAINTENANCE-------- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R VERNON PAVING COMPANY - MISC CHCS/MAY 89• --- - $399. 04 00019 001-400-3103-4309 00848 $63.64 05/31/89----- -- ST MAINTENANCE ---/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R VERNON PAVING COMPANY 00019 001-400-6101-4309 00697 $38.34 MISC CHCS/MAY 89. 05/31/89 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DAVID*VI,.ASACH ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 0 77367 $101.98 • 01642 001-210-0000-2110 02917 06/01/89 $50.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * • SALLY A. *WHITE SEC SERV/4-25-89 R SALLY A. *WHITE - SEC SERV/MAY 16.89------- — - 00140 05/18/89- 00140 —05/25/89-- • 001-400-4102-4201 00207 PLANNING COMM - 001-400-4102-4201 00208 - PLANNING COMM - $50.00 $102.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $153.00 --/CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT-- VE(JDOR TOTAL*********9t********************************************************** R JUNE*WILLIAMS _ MON EXP/MAY-89 $255.00 01507 001-400-1101-4317 00325 $13.00 05/31/89— - - CITY COUNCIL--YCONFERENCE-EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R WRAY PRINTING 00132 001-400-2101-4305 PRISONER-FORMS/POLICE-01/02 05/17-/89 POLICE $13.00 07785 30259 $0.00 06/07/89 -a 1 ,1..i 15552 08704 30260 • ,./ $404.70 06/08/89 1 ,f 00560 30261 e`' 00560 30261 $0.00 06/08/89 77367 08430 30262 $0.00 06/08/89 08608 30263 $0.00 06/08/89 08609 30263 - $0.00 - 06/08/89 IBJ I '^ 19 I..J 06695 30264 „`i $0. 00 --06/08/89 1 01014 $517.59 --/OFFICE-OPER-SUPPLIES 3601/02 08516 30265 •,,,'"" $517.59 $517. 59 —06/08/89 r—. P FINANCE-SFA340• TIME 15:42:49' PAY VENDOR - NAME DESCRIPTION • CITY OF HERMOSA.BEACH- DEMAND LIST FOR 06/13/89 VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $ AMOUNT INV/REF DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL*********4**•n******************************************************* R R R R R R XEROX CORPORATION EXCESS METER.USE/APR 89 24216 XEKOX CORPORATION LEASE PMT/JUNE 89 94838 XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT/JUNE 89 - --- 94839 XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT/JUNE 89 94835 XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT/JUNE 119 --- ---94836 XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT/JUNE 89 94837 R XEROX CORPORATION. ---- - LEASE PMT/JUNE 89 =-94836 $517.59 PAGE 0024 J DATE 06/08/89 —I•411 PO Si CHK tk AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00135 001-400-1208-4201 00550 $6.19 20724216 07393 30266 05/08/89 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/08/89 q 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00162 $238.16 522294838 00050 30266 2J 06/02/89 GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 06/08/89 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00163 $321.08 522294839 --- 06/02/89------- • - --- - GEN APPROP -- /LEASE -PAYMENTS - ---- - 00049 30266 $0.00 06/08/89 —I „L 00135 001-400-2201-6900 00073 $47.62 522294835 00053 30266 „4./ 06/02/89 FIRE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 06/08/89 00135 001-400-2401-6900 00038 $56.15 522294836 00051 30266 ,,V 06/02/89----------- - ANIMAL--CONTROL--ILEASE-PAYMENTS--------- . ---- --- -- $0.00 06/08/89• 00135 001-400-4601-6900 00039 $189.21 522294837 00052 30266 1,»U 06/02/89 COMM RESOURCES /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 06/08/89 00135 .110-400-3302-6900 00121 $114.'00 522294836 00051 30266 V 06/02/89 PARKING-ENF---/LEASE-PAYMENTS ----------- -- -- ----- $0.00 06/08/89- *** VENDOR TOTAL********.************************************************************ R ZUMAR INDUSTRIES ------ SIGNAL -REPLACEMENT -PARTS -10054 $972.41 01206 115-400-8165-4309 00002 $567.66 05/18/89 CIP-87-167- /MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS . *** VENDOR. TOTAL******************************************************************** *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $567.66 $420.716.90 10054 08807 30267 , V — $555:39-06/08/89 *** TOTAL WARRANTS#******I********************************************************** $543.171.05 J .'9 1 3p J 1 HLRLBY CERTII-Y THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED Di 13 THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PA E T�— 1NCLUSIVE OF THE •u WARRANT REGISTER FO AND F04S 4!LAULE FOR PAYME BY FINANCE ADMINT$r/ OAT: EACCURATE J T. THEREOF% 5 Y. J Honorable Mayor and June 6, 1989 For the Meeting of Members of the City Council June 13, 1989 CANCELLATION OF WARRANTS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the warrants listed below. #029870 - 4/25/89 001-210-0000-2110 #029880 - 4/25/89 001-400-2101-4312 tuition payment. Frank P. Unzueta - $500.00 - Account Number Duplicate warrant issued in error. - Mark Wright - $43.50 - Account Number - Payment for per diem to be re -issued with #029642 - 4/11/89 - Officer Lauretta Ellingson - $7.25 - Account Number 001-400-2101-4316 - Officer did not attend training. #029264 - 2/28/89 - Kim Page - $100.00 - Account Number 001-210 0000-2110 - Check lost in mail. Concur: Kevin Northcraft Noted for fiscal impact Gary' Brutsch City Treasurer City Manager Viki Copeland June 6, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of June 13, 1989 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Responsible Agent June 27, 1989 Consent Calendar Award of contract for Community Center Fire Alarm System, CIP 89-615 Public Works Director Award of contract for traffic control pre-emption, CIP 86-176 Public Works Director Future plans for Old Prospect School Community Resources Dir. Recommendation re. Pier concession contract Community Resources Dir. Accept traffic signal improvements as complete CIP 85-138 Public Works Director Accept Community Center air condi- tioning as complete CIP 88-610 Public Works Director Adopt regulations for candidate statements City Clerk Suggested last meeting to decide on ballot measures and direct City Atty. to prepare wording Accept CIP 88-614 as complete - Pier Storm Damage CIP 88-406 Call for Bids - Sewers Target Area 4 Reclassification of Business License position to Clerk Typist July 11, 1989 Suggested last meeting to approve ballot measures and wording July, 25, 1989 Suggested last meeting to call election and adopt resolutions with final ballot wording City Clerk Public Works Director Public Works Director Personnel Director City Clerk City Clerk 1 c Review of City Goals October 24, 1989 Last meeting to adopt resolution re. tie vote City Manager City Clerk ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared RFP for cost allocation plan Recreational Vehicle ordinance Development of design standards and criteria by which to review projects for EIRS Adoption of Uniform Fire, Building and Plumbing Codes Fire Sprinkler Ordinance Ordinance amending provision against selling gasoline and alcohol at same location Stuart construction bill Award of contract - Community Center fire alarm system CIP 88-604 Award of contract - Traffic signal pre-emption CIP 86-176 Refuse contract renewal Finance Administrator General Services Director Planning Director Public Safety/Building Public Safety Director City Attorney Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Building Director ***************************************************************** Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council June 6, 1989 City Council Meeting of June 13, 1989 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of May 1989. Respectfully submitted, Gary7Brutsch City Treasurer NOTED: evin Northcraft City Manager Iti INSTITUTION TOTAL INVESTMENT REPORT - MAY 1989 DATE OF INVESTMENT DATE OF MATURITY INTEREST LAIF BALANCE 5/01/89 Investment Withdrawal Balance 5/31/89 $2,370,000.00 160,000.00 (500,000.00) $2,030,000.00 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT: Union Federal S&L Investment Union Federal S&L Investment Union Federal S&L Investment Community Bank Investment Community Bank Investment 4 $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 5/11/89 5/22/89 9/22/88 10/27/88 3/7/89 12/8/88 1/26/89 9/22/89 10/1/89 3/7/90 12/8/89 7/25/89 8.145% 8.50% 8.40% 9.50% 9.00% 9.15% City National Bank Investment $ 500,000.00 3/30/89 3/23/90 City National Bank Investment $ 500,000.00 4/25/89 4/25/90 City National Bank Investment $ 500,000.00 5/22/89 5/17/90 CORPORATE NOTES: Ford Motor Credit Co. Investment $ 500,000.00 5/19/88 5/20/93 Merrill Lynch & Co. Investment $ 500,000.00 6/30/88 1/2/90 Summit Bancorporation Investment $ 500,000.00 9/15/88 10/16/89 10.30% 10.00% 9.45% 9.10% 8.35% 8.90% U.S. TREASURY NOTE: Investment $ 500,937.94 2/22/89 1/31/91 9.20% Investment $ 505,551.17 3/13/89 3/31/90 9.45% Investment $ 506,721.33 3/21/89 3/31/90 9.61% Investment $ 501,895.72 3/23/89 11/15/89 9.42% FHLMC: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Investment Investment $ 248,733.64 $ 249,320.88 TOTAL BALANCE $10,043,160.68 Respectfully Submitted, Gar Brutsch `/ City Treasurer W 3/26/87 3/1/17 5/26/87 8/2/16 June 5, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 13, 1989 RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE RE -APPOINTMENT OF MR. SCOTT INGELL TO THE PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL OF THE JOB TRAINING PARTNERSHIP ACT (JTPA) Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council re -appoint Mr. Scott In- gell to represent the City of Hermosa Beach business •community on the Private Industry Councils of the Job Training Partnership Act. Background: The City of Hermosa Beach is a participating agency in the JTPA, South Bay Service Delivery Area (SBSDA). Under the Joint Powers Agreement which formed the SBSDA, each member city agreed to ap- point a representative of the private sector business community to the PIC. Mr. Scott Ingell was originally appointed by the Council on Au- gust 9, 1989 to•serve the unexpired term of Mr. Ken Handman. The PIC has policy and oversight responsibilities for local pro- grams. It is comprised of twenty-one (21) members with a simple majority of members from the private sector and includes rep- resentatives from education, labor, rehabilitation agencies, community-based organizaitons, economic development agencies, and employment service agencies. Analysis: Mr. Wesley D. Bush, Executive Vice President, of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, has submitted the attached letter stating the Chamber's nominations. It is SDA policy that the local Chamber provide a slate for nominations which represents 150% of the available PIC seats (i.e. 1 vacancy must have 2 nominees). The recommendation to re -appointment Mr. Ingell is based upon his expressed interest in continuing as the PIC representative as well as his involvement with the business interests of this community. The term of this appointment is July 1, 1989 - June 30, 1993. Respectfully subm Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Concur: %trl' , Kevin B. Nort}icraft City Manager HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER .AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 June 2, 1989 Mayor June Williams and Council City of Hermosa Beach City Hall/Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mayor Williams and Council Members: The Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce has solicited for private sector, nominees from the Hermosa Beach business community to your Private Industry Council (PIC). The nominees we are submitting for your consideration of appoint- ments are as follows: Mr. Scott Ingell Scotty's on the Strand Mr. Chuck Bowman Hermosa Beach resident We look forward to this cooperative effort under the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA), between public and private sectors of the City. Sicerely, Wesley" D. Bush Executive Vice President Immo rm.. r ��� 1 T immiume May,16, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of May 23, 1989 RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT REGARDING THE AUDIT AND EVALUATION OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCH OPERATION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council receive and file this report. BACKGROUND: The City of Hermosa Beach began operating its own public safety dispatch on December 29, 1988. During the first month of operation, the emergency 911 system failed on three separate occassions for three different reasons. This, coupled with the fact that the entire changeover was a massive undertaking, prompted the City to seek an unbiased evaluation and audit of the entire system to assure that it was set up properly and to make recommendations for improvement. At the regular City Council meeting of February 28, 1989, Council appropriated $3,500 from Prospective Expenditures to pay for the services of a communications consultant and authorized the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Richter Group Communications Consultants to perform the communications eva- luation and audit of the City's public safety dispatch operation. Additionally, GTE California Incorporated was asked to submit recommendations which could improve the 911 system and Advanced Electronics was asked to compile a technical report for the radio communications portion of the system. ANALYSIS: The report from the Richter Group addressed several concerns and gave several recommendations to remedy those concerns. Each of the major concerns will be listed below, with a brief statement of how they are being addressed by the department: RADIO FREQUENCIES AND LICENSE A dedicated radio frequency is needed for Hermosa Beach Police.... Application for a frequency was processed several months ago, but it is a slow process. We are aware of the need for a separate frequency and will remain vigilant on this matter. DISPATCH CENTER STAFFING Staffing; there should be more than one dispatcher on duty during the "busy times"....We are adding a sixth dispatcher by replacing a vacant PSO position with a dispatcher. Additionally, different schedules are being considered so that deployment is during the "busy times." 1 ig ` DISPATCH PROCEDURES Dispatch procedures and operations manual needed....We are in the process of writing the operations and procedures manual for the department. Need a policy concerning what calls for service are entered into the system...All calls for service are being entered into the system. TRAINING Dispatchers need more training on the communications equipment, the com- puter system, interagency procedures, etc All dispatchers have now completed the POST dispatcher training. We are scheduling specific training on the equipment so they will be familiar with its operation, and they are constantly being updated on the functions of the records and CAD systems. Training will continue to be an on-going issue that will be addressed. Need to have documentation on the multifrequency transmit/receive modules in the console This will be addressed in the operations manual and training will be given. FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS Air conditioning problems in the dispatch and equipment rooms Funds have been budgeted for replacement of the air conditioning in the equipment room, but were not approved for the upstairs portion of the department. It is hoped that the funds available will cover the costs to air condition the dispatch room as well as the equipment room. Noise level of the printer in the dispatch room needs to be eliminated.... We have budgeted funds to either purchase a sound cabinet to place around the existing printer or to purchase a laser printer, whichever is most effective. Blinds, shades, or some type of window covering installed to block the glare and heat in the dispatch room....We are in the process of acquiring quotes to take care of this concern with funds available in this year's budget. EARTHQUAKE PROTECTION Earthquake bracing for all of the equipment should be installed....We are contacting the various vendors and requesting that adequate bracing and provision for earthquakes be installed. Shelves in the equipment room should be eliminated and in favor of more permanent mounting of equipment....This is in the process of being accomplished. OVERHEAD PIPE HAZARD Water protection and water flow alarm are needed for the equipment room ..We are working with Public Works to acquire some type of adequate pro- tection for the equipment. We will investigate the possibility of some type of alarm system for the room. 2 EMERGENCY GENERATOR SECURITY A security fence around the emergency generator should be installed...This will be addressed with the assistance of Public Works. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE RECORDS Basic inventory of system needs to be developed....The Systems Manager will address this concern and create the necessary records. CONSOLES NEED DUAL HEADSET JACKS Dual headset jacks are needed at each dispatch position...We have contacted the console vendor and have ordered these jacks. ADDITIONAL E-911 INSTRUMENT An additional 911 telephone should be installed near a computer terminal... We are contacting GTE for assistance in this concern and will assure that it is installed as soon as possible. An unlisted number is needed for the dispatch room....As stated above, we will contact GTE for assistance and installation. City 'Focus' telephone system is obsolete and should be replaced...Although this particular concern is not part of the public safety system, it is a concern. It is our understanding that the City is looking into the possible replacement of this system in the near future. DISPATCHER -FIELD OFFICER INTERACTION Need to have improved level of communications between field personnel and dispatchers We have already had one joint meeting with field personnel and dispatchers to address matters of mutual concern. Improvement has been noted and ride-alongs for the dispatchers have been planned. This will be an on-going concern that will require attention. CAD EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE Should be a specific maintenance plan for the CAD/RMS and communications equipment...We have maintenance agreements in place with all vendors at this time. Should add the E-911 interface and obtain CLETS on one terminal....This has all been installed and is in operation. Provide uninterruptible power supply for the CAD/RMS system...This is already in place. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE STANDARDS --TRANSMITTER DEVIATION Audio level of the Fire frequency should be increased...We have contacted our radio service company and requested adjustment. 3 The GTE recommendations from for improving the 911 system consist of only two items; a backup battery supply for the PSAP equipment in three, four, or eight hour configurations and alternate routing. Because we have the 911 PSAP equipment attached to our uninterruptable power - supply as well as the emergency generator, we don't feel that the expense for the extra battery backup is warranted. We do feel that alternate this possibility with GTE. Beach and/or the County Li all three of the agencies backup for each agency in There is no backup in the gets cut in another area. routing is a viable recommendation and will pursue We will be considering an agreement with Redondo feguards in Hermosa Beach as our alternate route. If are able to link together, there will be adequate the event that one of the local PSAP's goes down. event a remote switching station goes down or a line The technical communications report is merely a 'map' of the entire com- munications system showing the location and interface of each component. It serves to address some of the documentation and inventory concerns of the con- sultant's report. SUMMARY: Based on the audit conducted by the consultant and on site visits to several public safety communications centers, it is apparent that the Hermosa Beach operation is second to none as far as equipment and systems are concerned. We feel that our operation will be one of the best in the South Bay once all of the recommendations have been successfully addressed. The experience of our person- nel is the only area of deficiency, but this will be corrected with time on the job and additional training for the dispatchers. CONCUR: tfu l l •, bmi tted , Steve S. Wisniewski Director of Public Safety Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: The report provides an excellent checklist of projects to complete to make our state of the art system as error -free as humanly possible. Two additional areas have been requested of the dept.: 1) a formalized complaint review process for users, and 2) 90 -day status reports until all consultant suggestions have been implemented. RG 337 April 1989 EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT HERMOSA BEACH PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS AND OPERATIONS Submitted to: Mr. Steve S. Wisniewski Director of Public Safety CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 540 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Prepared By: Henry L. Richter, Ph.D., PE RICHTER GROUP 178 West Longden Avenue Arcadia, CA 91006 EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT HERMOSA BEACH PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS AND OPERATIONS 1. INTRODUCTION This consulting study was made to carry out an evaluation and assessment of the Public Safety communication operations for the City of Hermosa Beach. A consultant team performed a comprehensive eval- uation of the Public Safety communication operations about eight years ago. Several significant happenings have occurred since then, and the Department management has wisely chosen to have an inde- pendent evaluation made of the present state of affairs. New leader- ship has come into the Department. The communications center and equipment has been upgraded from something considered below the bare minimum (since all dispatching and communications was handled by the South Bay Regional Communications Center) to a modern dispatch center and radio system. This change came about because the City terminated its arrangement with the Regional Communications Center and took over the responsibility of its own communications operations in December of 1988. This evaluative study included an examination of the physical aspects of the facility and communications equipment, observation and assessment of the operational aspects -of communications, and a general examination of the technical side of the communications oper- ation. The City has independently asked for a telephone system evaluation from the telephone utility and a radio system evaluation from _the radio maintenance organization. Data for this assessment was obtained by interviews of manage- ment as well as dispatch personnel, by physical examination and observation of the facilities and equipment, and by conversations with telephone company and radio maintenance personnel. This report is divided into several areas. The first is a general description of the Hermosa Beach Public Safety dispatch capa- bility. Specific discussions are then directed toward operations, equipment, and facility. A deficiency discussion session then RG 337/1 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO SYSTEM ANALYSIS Page 1-1 follows, and the last section highlights some recommendations to the . Department and City management. There is a list of areas of needed improvement in the Hermosa Beach Public Safety dispatching system that was derived from observations during the month of March, 1989. These comments are directed at one purpose: to better insure the successful operations of the communications support to the Fire and Police agencies of the City. No criticism of any individual, department, or process is intended. RG 337/1 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO PLAN Page 1-2 The City of Hermosa Beach established its own public safety dispatch operations the end of December 1988. For the last decade - plus, the City contracted for police and fire dispatch services with the South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority (SBRPCA) or "RCC." The decision was made to terminate this arrangement and to establish dispatch capability in the Police facility. A number of steps were required to bring this about. First, radio frequencies were needed to carry out the dis- patch. Hermosa Beach units were dispatched on a UHF 470 MHz frequency that was licensed to the RCC. A frequency was needed, and rather than go through the tedious and difficulty frequency acqui- sition process, an arrangement was made with the City of Redondo Beach to operate on a frequency licensed to them, and with a base station owned by them (a mobile relay -repeater) located in the Palos Verdes Hills. When Redondo Beach pulled away from the RCC, it obtained a 460 MHz police frequency for operations. Redondo Beach was still licensed on 470/473.3125 MHz, which is one of the RCC tactical frequencies, and by letter agreement Redondo Beach was allowed to operate on this channel through the Redondo Beach repeater which was still in place. The Hermosa Beach radio license did have a control station on this frequency located in the Police facility, and so this allowed direct control of the Redondo Beach repeater located on Palos Verdes. The Hermosa Beach Fire units have operated on a UHF high band frequency which is part of the South Bay group. This is used by the RCC fire agencies as well as others in the South Bay such as Redondo Beach and Torrance. Hermosa Beach held a valid FCC license for this frequency and had a base station and antenna located on the Police - Fire building. When Hermosa Beach assumed its own dispatch responsi- bilities, they simply began using this base station for dispatch. An arrangements was made with Redondo Beach to use an additional receiver, located on Palos Verdes, to help the dispatchers to hear weaker portable radios who may be some distance from the station. The talk -out coverage of the local base station seems to be adequate. RG 337/2 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO SYSTEM ANALYSIS Page 2-1 The remote receiver is brought into the dispatch consoles by wire- line. As the City prepared to disengage from the RCC, a number of pieces of equipment had to be obtained. The City bought new Motorola Centracom II consoles, the latest state-of-the-art. A dispatch center facility was prepared so that the consoles could be installed in it. A computer aided dispatch system was purchased and installed. Recently mobile digital terminals have been purchased, although they are not yet operational, due to software interface deficiencies of the Command Data Systems CAD system. Dispatch staff had to be hired, trained, and put into operation. Operational procedures had to be developed, and this is still in process. Since the Richter Group staff did an assessment of communi- cation operations for Hermosa Beach police and fire a number of years ago, this study was commissioned to provide an outside assessment to the Department and City management concerning the new operations. O RG 337/2 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO SYSTEM ANALYSIS Page 2-2 When dispatch responsibilities were assumed by the new communi- cations center, they began with full telephone company 911 Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) capability. All of the 911 equipment was obtained and installed in the basement equipment room not only to provide the 911 service but also automatic number identification (ANI) and automatic location identification (ALI). These 911 lines terminate on two telephone instruments located on the dispatch consoles. Two modern Motorola Centracom II consoles were obtained and put into place. These had provision for all of the operational fre- quencies available to Hermosa Beach, as well as some additional capability for mutual aid purposes. The CAD screens and keyboards were installed in the consoles, and the system became operational the end of December 1988. The Department is operating with limited dispatcher staff. The staffing provides only one operator on duty at a time, and although more than adequate for most circumstances, occasionally events do happen that require two or more people to handle the volume of telephone and radio traffic and the coordination that must be done. A couple of parttime dispatchers from Torrance are used, and this provides a small reservoir of trained personnel. However, there is very little overlap between these people and the Hermosa Beach operators, so not much training takes place. When some significant incident takes place, the dispatch staff counts on bringing other nearby personnel from Records or the jail area to help handle the overload. Unfortunately, it is not possible to alert people and get them in there on a timely manner, and sometimes there simply are no personnel available. RG 337/3 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO SYSTEM ANALYSIS Page 3-1 One of the consultants was in the dispatch center when notif i - cation came from Redondo Beach that a bank holdup suspect was making his way north on Pacific Coast Highway, and the radio and telephone both got very busy. The Records supervisor happened to be in the room and helped by handling some of the telephone calls. Two different Hermosa Beach units began tailing suspects, and for a 10 -minute period, both ladies were very hard pressed to try and keep up with the telephone and radio traffic, what with the notifications and coordination with the two adjacent cities as well as the Hermosa Beach Police units making traffic stops on the suspects, etc. It was a perfect example of how one person could in no way have handled all the different facets of that operation, particularly with officer safety involved making stops of two different suspect vehicles and trying to stay coordinated with the neighboring cities. There was no cross -monitoring between cities, and so all information had to be exchanged by telephone. The dispatch center has a new modern logging tape recorder. It has a CAD printer which is definitely on the noisy side. The City is using copies of the RCC procedural manuals, since none have been directly developed for the City itself. The manuals are of two different ages, one dated 1987 and one dated 1983. The dispatchers urgently need training on the radio system and the consoles. With a repeated type radio system it is important to understand somewhat how it operates. Many of the console modules may at may not be functional, but their exact function and operation is unknown to the dispatchers interviewed. Not only is training needed, but a reference procedure manual is needed to answer any questions that may come up that the trainee has forgotten. As far as the CAD operations are concerned, there seems to be good understanding on what to do. However, there appears to be an unclear policy of exactly what activities get logged as a call into the computer. Some very low priority "assist the citizen" may be handled without formally being recorded in the computer. While this is a policy issued by the City, the consultants recommend that, if RG 337/3 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO PLAN Page 3-2 only for statistical purposes, all services of any type be recorded in the computer. There needs to be better training on coordination with outside fire and police support that may be needed by the City. It was observed that staff are comfortable with processing single -event, City -specific activities. There appeared to be little to no experience with supporting big operations. This was particularly true in the area of radio communications capabilities. The telephone was viewed as the primary means of communications outside the City. while a valuable tool, the telephone can only call one agency at a time and may fail during critical times. The extensive communications capabilities of the consoles may not be fully recognized, resulting in the dispatcher not providing the communications support necessitated by a major event. O RG 337/3 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO PLAN Page 3-3 4. FACILITY A new facility has been developed on the main floor of the Police building. Previously, the City had a small dispatch area adjacent to the public window in the Records room. A room has been dedicated to dispatch and is adequate to house the two consoles and personnel. The dispatching room is properly sized to accommodate the dispatch center, and the use of doors, glass, and an access window/ tray for officers to talk to the dispatchers without coming into the room is well done. The security in the room is good. There are large windows allowing good contact with those in the hallway. A locked door is there but it is often open due to air conditioning problems. The room is secure from outsiders, but the open door tends to encourage drop-in traffic of the officers, and although contact between officers and dispatchers is important to help working relationships, it tends to also be a distraction when radio traffic or telephone calls from the citizens are in progress. Officers walk directly into the room to talk to the dispatchers. This can cause disruption of ongoing events and causes more dispatcher distraction than is necessary. Furthermore, the physical presence of the officers encourage more conversation and socialization, detracting from the primary task of the dispatcher, emergency telephone answering, and radio communication. There is need for a better air conditioning arrangement in the dispatch center. The present air conditioning in the room (window units built into the wall) are noisy and not very satisfactory. As a consequence, they are often not turned on and the door is left open for air circulation. There is a need for a remote air conditioning unit with cool air being brought into the room via ducts. The air conditioning deficiences cause a couple problems including the following. RG 337/4 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO PLAN Page 4-1 The console lighting track spotlights in the ceiling generate considerable heat. They are therefore often turned off for that reason, and the general room lights are used. These cause excessive glare on the computer screen, making the reading of critical information harder and more subject to error. It was noted that there is a need for blinds or drapes on exterior windows. The late afternoon sun is very bright through the windows and results in such reflection that it is hard to read the computer screens on which vital information is located, i.e., the address of the call, registration and want information on vehicles, etc. The room also has a CAD printer. It is a noise -generator and there is need to place a sound -reduction box around the printer to alleviate this problem. a RG 337/4 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO PLAN Page 4-2 5. BQQIPl` There are two fundamental locations where communications equipment is housed. One is the dispatch center, and that is covered in general terms in the last chapter. Two dispatch consoles are located there. The Dictaphone logging recorder and tape library is located there. The CAD system printer is also located there. A covered section of flooring has been built behind the consoles to contain and protect the wiring cables. All of the rest of the equipment is located in the basement almost underneath the dispatch center. The central electronics bank which is the "brainbox" that drives the consoles is located there. Several radio base stations are located there, the CAD computer equipment is located there, and the telephone switch (serving the whole system) is located there. The room seems to have ample space for the equipment that is located there. The room has some environmental problems that need to be addressed. A number of water and drain pipes run across the ceiling in the room, making for a significant hazard to the technical equipment, should any sort of leak occur. Condensation evidently does occur because there are some drip trays suspended underneath some of the piping. The room has a stand-alone air conditioner which takes up significant space and which should really be replaced with a 2 -piece unit, and there are abandoned and unterminated wires and cables here and there. It may well be possible to combine this air conditioner with an air conditioner to serve the dispatch area, locating the compressor unit outside somewhere and bringing either air or refrigerant into both spaces and distributing the air through duct work. The equipment room is in need of housekeeping and straight- ening up. One problem is when there are several different install- ation and maintenance organizations, no one has a concern for the overall layout or condition of the room. In general, the wiring is in reasonable shape. The radio base stations are mounted against the wall and are secure. The rack containing the console central RG 337/5 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO PLAN Page 5-1 electronics circuit cards does not have earthquake bracing nor a service loop on the cabling. In case of a significant earthquake, it is possible that this rack could pull loose, or even if not totally pulling loose could have the cabling pulled loose from their sockets. The 911 equipment cabinets should also be tied down better. An earthquake brace to the Focus telephone system cabinet would also be worthwhile. There is a mixture of new and old base station equipment. It is understood that some of the older equipment, such as the Public Works base station, is in the process of being replaced. The uninterruptible power supply (UPS) should be better an- chored for earthquake safety. The comments made about possible leaks form the pipes overhead should also be borne in mind in case of earthquake damage. Additional catch -pans would probably be a good investment. A water alarm remoted to the dispatch center is also recommended. A comment needs to be made about the telephone system, a Focus switch. The telephone company analysis was not available at the time of this writing, but it needs to be pointed out that that equipment was obsolete years ago, and the City would be well advised to replace this with modern switching equipment. Also under the subject of equipment, the backup generator needs to be mentioned. It has no security protection. It is located at the back of one of the garage stalls and is quite open to malicious damage or sabotage. A small chainlink cage enclosing it would be a relatively inexpensive bit of insurance. O RG 337/5 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO PLAN Page 5-2 A number of comments were made along with the narrative of the observations made during the consultants' examination. The consult- ants wish to present these as highlights for emphasis. 6.1 RADIO FREQUENCIES AND LICENSE The City of Hermosa Beach does not have its own police fre- quency. At the present time, operations are being conducted on a frequency designated for use by the RCC and under the aegis of the Redondo Beach FCC license. While handling the short-range need, this is not a long-term solution. The indefinite use of a frequency under such circumstances is fragile, to say the least. The serious question is whether or not this is a violation of the FCC Rules -- using a transmitter licensed to another jurisdiction as the primary user. It is recommended that a search be started immediately for a Hermosa Beach frequency. The Hermosa Beach Fire frequency use is fine, the license is in order, and there should be no problems with this operation. 6.2 DISPATCH CENTER STAFFING Although not atypical of cities the size of Hermosa Beach, staffing with one dispatcher during busy times is the setup for a crisis_ waiting to happen. It is not fair to the dispatchers, to the citizens, or to the field forces to have the potential for signif- icant overload and breakdown of communications center operations. One person is certainly adequate to handle normal activities, but should a major incident happen that would involve both police and fire plus numerous citizen calls, there is no way one person can adequately deal with all these factors. The City should be aware of its liability in this regard. Staffing reeds to be increased to two persons during predic- table periods of peak radio and telephone activity. Present staff levels typically place one person on duty. This is inadequate for RG 337/6 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO PLAN Page 6-1 both the telephone and radio function. The demands of record/ it critical information from a citizen on the telephone while simultane- ously supporting police or fire radio communications that may be life-threatening are mutually inconsistent. The computer system can provide the statistical information necessary to identify these peak periods. The consultants' experience suggests that an evening lap shift (i.e., from 1900 hours to 0300 hours) may be appropriate. 6.3 DISPATCH PROCEDURES Formalized dispatch procedures are an absolute necessity. Understandably, these will be developed as the center matures. However, in order for operators to handle calls and dispatch in a con- sistent manner, procedures are needed. Procedure books are available from a number of departments, and adaptations can be made to suit Hermosa Beach's specific style. A good procedures manual is one of the best defenses against a lawsuit involving dispatch procedures. If a procedures book exists and it is followed reasonably, then courts tend to look upon the procedures as professional and earnest. The procedures should eventually cover all phases of call answering, unit dispatching, CAD operations, dealing with different types of situations, and how reports and notifications are handled. Should the dispatch center become sophisticated enough to develop procedures and resources for evaluating and advising medical aid calls on the telephone, then these definitely need to be formalized into a cardex or on the computer files someplace. Handling such calls, i.e., giving CPR instruction over the telephone, how to control bleeding, etc., will definitely require more than one person in the dispatch center, since a dispatcher cannot get that involved in life-saving procedures and still fulfill responsibilities handling calls from the field and from the public. 6.4 TRAINING Dispatcher training on the operation of the radio system, the operation of the consoles, and operation of the CAD system is essential. Each dispatcher should have some fundamental knowledge of RG 337/6 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO PLAN Page 6-2 how a repeater system operates, generally where the- equipment bier located (to recognize and deal with communications systems problems), and how it is controlled from the console. The console has a number of functions that give flexibility in operating the various base stations and monitors available. There is no documentation on the, multifrequency transmit/receive modules and no knowledge. This needs to be rectified quickly. Training on handling interagency calls is also necessary. Much of this could be done over the radio when adjoining cities are concerned, thus saving valuable time dialing phone numbers. Also monitoring capability should be available and used when any incident is in progress that involves neighboring units. 6.5 FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS The air conditioning needs were commented on earlier in this report. The wall air conditioning units are less than satifactory, and a small dedicated system should be obtained and have the compressor unit outside to eliminate noise. Drapes on the windows would also help cut down glare and warm sunlight in middle and late afternoon. Otherwise, the facility appears very adequate. 6.6 EARTHQUAKE PROTECTION A number of items of equipments were found not to be properly anchored. Upset in the course of an earthquake could destroy the communications capability of the dispatch center. Several pieces of equipment were noticed in the basement equipment room where were not adequately fastened down. Of note was the central electronics bank. Although fastened to the floor, some kind of motion restraint at the top (either a bracket or cables to the ceiling or wall) would prevent the type of harmonic motion that an earthquake produces that could rip the anchors out of the floor. Other equipment in the room should also be secured including the 911 equipment, the telephone switch, and the UPS equipment. RG 337/6 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO PLAN Page 6-3 It could not be determined if the consoles were properly fastened to the floor; the access to the back is not that easy. But this feature should be verified with Motorola and the console installers. The logging tape recorder should be secured so that it does not upset or come toward the operators during an earthquake. Along with the mechanical cleanup the room wiring needs to be put in somewhat better order in a few places. Wire dressing and attachment would make the installation look more professional. Some documentation of the wiring should be available in the equipment room. The shelves on which some equipment is sitting should be eliminated and the equipment more permanently mounted with brackets to the wall. 6.7 OVERHEAD PIPE HAZARD The water and sewage pipes across the ceiling of the equipment room need fluid diversion trays. While the best option would be to relocate the equipment room where there are no overhead water pipes, this undoubtedly is not practical. Thus, the placement of trays below the pipes to divert any flow from broken pipes, to a floor drain may be an effective and low-cost solution. A single broken pipe in the present environment could disable the E-911 system, the consoles, and the computer for an extended time period. Additionally, the resulting damage could be very expensive to repair. 6.8 EMERGENCY GENERATOR SECURITY The emergency generator is not located within any kind of secure area. A simple chainlink wall would be a very good deterrent to discourage anyone from tampering with this vital piece of equipment. RG 337/6 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO PLAN Page 6-4 6.9 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE RECORDS A basic inventory system of all communications equipment needs to be developed; it would best be done as a computer file. Mainten- ance records of equipment can be valuable and an excellent way of managing the equipment. The records do not need to be elaborate, simply indicating by date when maintenance was performed. This way, if it was desired to look at specific maintenance items for any given piece of equipment, by going to the service ticket by date that information could be determined. Maintenance records will help insure that the annual FCC checks are made. They will also indicate any piece of equipment that is developing excessive maintenance and therefore in need of replacement. 6.10 CONSOLES NEED DUAL HEADSET JACKS The two console positions should each be equipped with dual headset jacks. This would permit a supervisor or traininee to plug into a console, working alongside a dispatcher. These are not expensive items. It is suggested that the headset jacks be mounted at opposite ends of the working counter. 6.11 ADDITIONAL E-911 INSTRUMENT There is a need to have at least one more telephone containing the E-911 and other emergency telephone lines for major events. This instrument should be located either in the dispatch room or at a 1Scation with a computer terminal so service requests can be entered into the CAD system. The dispatchers' telephones needs a separate unlisted direct business line direct to the room. It should bypass the Focus switch so it would be operational if a malfunction occurs. An independent telephone line would permit dispatchers to gain telephone access even if all other lines in the City are jammed with incoming or outgoing calls. RG 337/6 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO PLAN Page 6-5 Incidentally, the telephone bell on' the Rte' dim lines iet loud; it should be made much less shrill. 6.12 DISPATCHER -FIELD OFFICER INTERACTION There is a need for an improved level of communications between field personnel and dispatchers. This is a continuing problem in all dispatch centers. Because life -safety is so much involved in this business, both officers and dispatchers are very sensitive to perceived and actual errors. The consultants have found that the majority of conflicts are issues of perception rather than fact. A simple and short discussion between the two groups is often all that is needed for the perceived conflict to be resolved. In those cases where a mistake was made, the best learning process is for the involved parties to explain the correct process and why it should be followed. the present staffing limitations and work hour mismatch between dispatchers and field personnel inhibit dispatcher attendance at briefings. The consultants are not sufficiently familiar with the City operations and policies to provide a specific recommendation to accomplish this goal. 6.13 CAD EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE There is a need to identify a specific maintenance plan for the CAD/RMS and communications equipment. Staff should have documentation on how to obtain repair on each piece of equipment in the building, and for the radio and telephone systems outside the building. The City should continue to enhance the CAD/RMS to add the E-911 interface and obtain CLETS mneumonics so all computer access can be done from one terminal. A training component is involved in both of these capabilities. Since different pieces of the CAD equipment (such as the color status terminals) were obtained from different vendors, there is no overall system responsibility. CDS, the CAD supplier, will not maintain or take responsibility for these other pieces of equipment. A unified maintenance plan need to be established. RG 337/6 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO PLAN Page 6-6 4 " from commercial to emergency generator have resulted in excessive downtime of the system. It is typical for public safety computer systems to be protected by UPS power. The-CAWRNEF system should be provided with- anti uninterrupastellis power supply (UPS). It is reported that previous power transfers 6.14 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE STANDARDS --TRANSMITTER DEVIATION The voice audio level of the Hermosa Beach fire equipment is reported to be notably lower than those of other departments. Thus, when several agencies are operating on the channel, it is difficult for the dispatcher to recognize the City units. This report should be examined for possible technical problems. This is a common problem where several departments share °a - frequency. The technicians do not all use the same standards in aligning, tuning, and setting levels on the equipment. This is particularly true with transmitter deviation both on voice and dispatch tones. Agreement should be obtained among the technicians that handle the various systems that they will set maximum deviation at something like 4.3 kHz. 0 RG 337/6 HERMOSA BEACH RADIO PLAN Page 6-7 4,/ HONORABLE.MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL June 6, 1989 Regular Meeting of June 13, 1989 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #19033 (C.U.P. CON NO. 87-13) LOCATION: 1078 MONTEREY BOULEVARD APPLICANT: BONNIE FOLKART REQUEST: APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP FOR 3 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff •recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #19033 which is consistent with the approved Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map #19033 at their October 20, 1987 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. Michael Schubach Planning Director evin B. Northcrft City Manager T/srfinmap RespeSrtfully, submitted, Ken Robertson Advanced Planner 1•• 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH., CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #19033 FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1078 MONTEREY BOULEVARD, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on June 13, 1989 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 87-60, adop- ted after public hearing on October 20, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach,. California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #19033 1. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 8, Block 56, First Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract, as recorded in Book 1, Pages 59 and 60 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles, for a three- unit condominium project on land commonly known as 1078 Mon- terey Boulevard, Hermosa Beach, California... • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermo- sa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: T/r s f inmap CITY CLERK life4p CITY ATTORNEY June 6, 1989 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL June 13, 1989 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #19513 (C.U.P. CON NO. 88-2) LOCATION: 610 PALM DRIVE APPLICANT: OTTO PALMER & FRED HICKEY REQUEST: APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP FOR 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #19513 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #19513 at their February 16, 1988 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director T/srfinmap Res ectfully submitt oe/ en Robertson Advanced Planner 1j 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL•PARCEL MAP #19513 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 610•PALM.DRIVE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on•June 13, 1989 and made' the.,following Findings: • • A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of t Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for. its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 88-16, adop- ted after public hearing on February 16, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #.19513 - 1• - 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 27, Tract 1075, as recorded in Book 17, Page 140 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of Los An- geles, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 610 Palm Drive, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1989. ,RESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermo- sa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: K.A.Ag, tc ot,07 CITY ATTORNEY T/rsfinmap - 2'• - June 1, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council June 13, 1989 PROJECT TOUCH LEASE AGREEMENT (ROOM 11) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the attached lease agreement between the City and Project Touch for Room 11 in the Community Center. BACKGROUND Project Touch has been leasing space in the Community Center since 1979. ANALYSIS The lease space space for Room 11 is 400 sq. ft. with a monthly rental of $296. ($.74 sq. ft.) This rate will be in effect until June 30, 1990. The attached lease conforms to the present square footage rental policy. Concur: Alana Mastrian-Handman Director Dept. of Commun'ty Res urces Kevin B. Northcr City Manager Respectfully submitted, /ail0S , •�iCr�r,.o Marsha Ernst Administrative Aide Community Resources Dept. • Noted for Fiscal Impapt: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator lk HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 13th day of June 1989 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and Project Touch (Lessee). A. RECITALS: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:. 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of one (1) year commencing on the 1st day of July ,1989 , and ending on the 30th day of June ,1990 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room 11 400 sq. ft. 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac- cording to the following schedule: July 1, 1989, to June 30, 1990: •$296/mo. $.74 sq. ft Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of the following month. 3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises except such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such signs shall be in accordance with the policy established by the Lessor. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Counseling services And for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Depratment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any di- rect or indirect act or any omission of the Lessee, its of- ficers, agents and employees arising out of the lessee's use of said premises. The lessee, at its own cost, expense and risk shall defend any and all actions, suits or other pro- ceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal- ly served upon the party or•deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: Project Touch 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attn: Julie Dorr Feys Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first hereinabove set forth. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM://.40:0? CITY ATTORNEY LESSEE: DATE: • June 1, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council RECOMMENDATION City Council Meeting of June 13, 1989 PROJECT TOUCH LEASE AGREEMENT (ROOM 3) It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached lease agreement between the City and Project Touch for additional space in the Community Center. (Room 3) BACKGROUND Project Touch presently leases Room C and Room 11 and they have been tenants at the Community Center since October, 1979. Room 3 became available when the Salvation Army terminated their lease agreement effective May 1, 1989. ANALYSIS The lease space for Room 3 is 529 sq. ft. with a monthly rental of $370. ($.70 sq. ft.) This rate will be in effect until July 1, 1989, and then will increase to $.74 sq. ft. or $391 per month. The attached lease conforms to the present square footage rental policy and all other conditions of the former lease remain the same. iTiel Alana Mastrian-HanA Director Community Resources Dept. 1' ✓ 1L_— i Kevih B. Northcraft City Manager " 1 Respectfully submitted, Marsha Ernst Administrative Aide Community Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator 11 HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 13th day of June , 1989 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and Project Touch (Lessee). A. RECITALS: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of one (1) year commencing on the 1st day of June ,1989 , and ending on the 31st day of May ,1990 • 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room 3 (529 sq. ft.) 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac- cording to the following schedule: June 1, 1989, thru June 30, 1989, $370/mo. $.70 sq.ft. July 1, 1989, thru May 31, 1990, $391/mo. $.74.sq.ft. Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of the following month. 3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises except such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such signs shall be in accordance with the policy established by the Lessor. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Counseling services And for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Depratment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any di- rect or indirect act or any omission of the lessee, its of- ficers, agents and employees arising out of the lessee's use of said premises. The lessee, at its own cost, expense and risk shall defend any and all actions, suits or other pro- ceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal- ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: Project Touch 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attn: Julie Dorr Feys Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first hereinabove set forth. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: LVVIA.,L,/e:/2 CITY ATTORNEY DATE: LESSEE: May 31, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of RegularMeeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 13, 1989 UPDATE OF ALL EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATIONS, 12 HOUR PARKING AREAS, CURBSIDE (COMMERCIAL AREA) HANDICAP PARKING, RIGHT-OF-WAY PROHIBITED TO VEHICLES (PEDESTRIAN STREETS) Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 89- , of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, establishing traffic signal locations. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 89- , of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach establishing 12 hour parking areas. 3. Adopt Resolution No. 89- , of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, establishing curbside (commercial area) handicapped parking zones. 4. Refer right-of-way prohibited to vehicles (pedestrian streets) to the Planning Commission. Background: As part of the Department's on-going review it was determined that an update of Resolution N.S. 2435 and Ordinance No. N.S. 238 is necessary. Ordinance No. N.S. 238 and Resolution N.S. 2435 defines and establishes traffic control throughout the City. City Council has authority to designate the following. Traffic Control Status of Review 1. Stop Intersections Completed 2. One-way Streets Completed 3. Fifteen Minute Parking Zones -Streets Completed 4. Loading Zones Completed 5. White Zones Completed 6. Through Streets Completed 7. Handicap Parking, Residential Completed 8. Authorize Angle Parking Zone Completed 9. Truck Routes Completed 10. Residential Completed 11. Handicap Parking Commercial Areas Completed 12. Twelve Hour Limit Parking -Streets Completed 13. Recreational Parking Areas Completed 14. Traffic Signal Locations Completed - 1 - 15. Right-of-way Prohibited to Vehicles Completed (Pedestrian Street) 16. No Stopping Zones In Progress 17. No Parking Areas In Progress 18. One Hour Parking Limit Zones -Streets In Progress The other sections of Resolution N.S. 2435 and Ordinance No. N.S. 238 need additional review and as work is completed staff will present the results. Analysis: The analysis is divided into the following sections: 1. Curbside (commercial area) Handicapped Parking Zones - 12 Hour Parking Areas - Traffic Signal Locations - Recreational Parking Areas 2. Engineering Review 3. Sign Maintenance 4. Fiscal Impact 5. Summary 1. Curbside (commercial area) Handicapped Parking Zones - 12 Hour Parking Areas - Traffic Signal Locations - Recreational Parking Areas NOTE: No NEW curbside (commercial area) handicapped parking zones, 12 hour parking areas, traffic signal locations or recreational parking zones are being proposed. Resolution N:S. 2435 was first approved by the City Council on July 3, 1962. This resolution is governed by Ordinance N.S. 238 which was adopted by City Council on June 6, 1962. A search of the records and files in the City revealed that there exists no complete resolution listing all existing curbside (commercial area) handicapped parking zones, 12 hour parking areas, traffic signal locations or recreational parking. A complete listing is necessary for the efficient operation of both office and field crews, reduced potential liability and proper upkeep of City records. 2. Engineering Review A field inventory was performed and there are two existing 12 hour parking areas and 18 signal controlled intersections. There are six existing curbside (commercial area) handicapped parking spaces. There are no recreational parking areas at this time. A. Traffic Signal Location Municipal Code Section 19-39, says traffic signal locations are established by Council by resolution. There are 18 signal controlled intersections in the City at this time. These are listed on the attached resolution. B. Twelve Hour Parking Areas There are only two twelve hour packing areas in the City at this time, they are both off Valley Drive between Pier Avenue and Eighth Street. Municipal Code Section 19-77 states, Time Limit Parking is to be established by resolution of the City Council. C. Handicapped Parking (curbside commercial area) A resolution is necessary to establish curbside parking stalls for the exclusive use of disabled persons, pursuant to section 22511.7 and 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. There are three on Pier Avenue in front of the community center and three in back on Eleventh Place at this time. D. Right -of -Way Prohibited to Vehicles (Pedestrian Streets) A survey has been completed on pedestrian walk streets, it has been determined that 97% of the walk streets west of Beach Drive are used for parking and 37% East of Beach Drive are also used for parking. Ordinance No. 395 states (no vehicle is to be driven, ridden, or propelled over pedestrian walk streets) due to the complexity of this problem, we recommend this be refered to the Planning Commission. 3. Sign Maintenance No additional signage is required at this time. 4. Fiscal Impact No additional appropriation is necessary. 5. Summary All streets were inventoried No new traffic signal locations - 12 hour parking areas - or curbside (commercial areas) handicapped parking are being proposed at this time. Alternatives: Other alternatives available to City Council and considered by Staff: 1. Do nothing. 2. Modify the traffic signal, 12 hour parking and handicapped parking zones list. 3. Return to staff for further evaluation. Respectfully Submitted: -'Ga i aton� Engineering Technician Ant ony Antich Director of Rul5licWorks evin B. North• Cit fiJ ana.er aft • Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety Attachments: - Resolution No. 89- , 89- , and 89- , establishing Traffic Signal Locations, 12 hour Parking and Handicapped Parking Zones (to be adopted by City Council) 4 1 3 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A 'RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CONCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,. CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING TRAFFIC.SIGNAL LOCATIONS 4 WHEREAS, an engineering review has been performed. 5 • WHEREAS, the Municipal Code Section 19-39 titled "Traffic 6 Control Devices" needs updating.by resolution. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 8 SECTION 1. The following are established as Traffic 9 Controlled Intersections in the City of Hermosa Beach: 10 1. Hermosa Avenue and Herondo 11 2. Hermosa Avenue and 2nd Street 3. Hermosa Avenue and llth Street 12 4. Hermosa Avenue and Pier Avenue 5. Hermosa Avenue and 13th Street 13 6. Hermosa Avenue and 14th Street 7. Pacific Coast Highway and 2nd Street 14 8. Pacific Coast Highway and 5th Street 9. Pacific Coast Highway and 8th Street 15 10. Pacific Coast Highway and Aviation Boulevard 11. Pacific Coast Highway and Pier Avenue 16 12. Pacific Coast Highway and 21st Street 13. Pacific Coast Highway and Artesia Boulevard 17 14. Pacific Coast Highway and Longfellow Avenue 15. Artesia Boulevard and Prospect Avenue 18 16. Artesia Boulevard and Harper Avenue 17. Prospect Avenue and Aviation Boulevard 19 SECTION 3. This resolution shall become effective upon 20 adoption. 21 22 II PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1989. 23 24 PRESIDENT of the CITY COUNCIL and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California 25 II ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 26 27 28 J. l/'oQ,0, CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28. RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING TWELVE HOUR PARKING AREAS WHEREAS, Section 11.2 of Ordinance No. N.S. 238 (traffic code) provides that City Council, by resolution, establish "12 Hour Parking Zones" (Hermosa Beach Municipal Code 19-77). WHEREAS, an engineering review has been performed. WHEREAS, there is no resolution establishing 12 hour parking zones. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The following are established as Twelve Hour Parking Areas in the city of Hermosa Beach: Valley Drive, the area east of Valley Drive between Pier Avenue and Eighth Street. Valley Drive - West side from 130' to 300' north of Eighth Street. SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of ,• 1989. PRESIDENT of the CITY COUNCIL and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: (Kevtic..2_,�VG429 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING "COMMERCIAL AREA" CURBSIDE PARKING STALLS FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF DISABLED PERSONS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 22511.7 AND 22511.8 OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE, AS • HEREIN SET FORTH WHEREAS, an engineering review has been performed. • WHEREAS, the handicapped parking zones needs updating. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to Sections 22511.7 and 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code, that the following area is established curbside parking stall and space and designated as tow -away, pursuant to the California Vehicle Code. Pier Avenue - Three parking stalls in front of 710 Pier Avenue, the Community Center Eleventh Place - Three parking stalls in back of the Community Center SECTION 2. The handicapped zones will be reviewed at the end of two years after the adoption of this resolution. SECTION 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California , CITY CLERK , CITY ATTORNEY ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: oc„ fr2 ` June 6, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of June 13, 1989 AMERICAN BEACH VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission that City Council approve the addition of the American Beach Volleyball League's 4 -man tournament to the list of the beach volleyball tournaments held in Hermosa Beach this summer. BACKGROUND This request and five other volleyball tournament requests were approved by the Commission in February, 1989. Immediately thereafter the request for this particular tournament was withdrawn by the promoter. Therefore, in March, 1989 the City council approved the other five tournaments (see attached) and not this one. However the request for this tournament was resubmitted in May, 1989. As the Commission already approved it, it is now before the Council for final approval. ANALYSIS The tournament will be held August 12 and 13, 1989, and the sponsors for this tournament are: Mitsubishi Motors and Fruit of the Loom. To date, the City's 1989 pro volleyball events have proven to be highly successful and with no negative incidents. Craig Elledge of C E Sports has been responsible for several successful volleyball events in Hermosa Beach including last year's Kenwood Women's Pro which was very well run. Permit fees of $3,000 will be collected on behalf of the City. Remaining on our summer roster are the Men's Pro (Aug. 26 -27th), Women's Pro (July 23 -24th) and the Legends of Pro Volleyball (July 8 -9th). A 4 -man tournament would add a nice balance to the summer offerings. Concur: Alana Mastrian-Handman Director Dept. of Community Resources evin B. North9ra City Manager Respectfully submitted, Mary C)-Rooney, CO piinator Dept. of Community Resources 10 NAME OF ORGANIZATION TOURNAMENT 1989 BEACH VOLLEYBALL REQUESTS PREVIOUS YEARS SPONSOR IN HERMOSA $500 NOR - DATES REQUESTED REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT ASSOC. OF VOLLEYBALL PROFESSIONALS (Matt Gage) ATHLETIC SPORTS FOUNDATION (Steve Suttich) C E SPORTS (Craig Elledge) EPIC SPORTS MARKETING (James Leitz) I DIG SPORTSWEAR (Dave Behar) • MEN'S PRO HIGH SCHOOL BEACH VOLLEYBALL WOMEN'S PRO INTRAMURAL 6 -PERSON COED FROM 32 CALIFORNIA COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES MILLER LITE NORDSTROM JAG SWIMWEAR . FOOTLOCKER LEGENDS OF BEACH VOLLEYBALL I DIG SPORTSWEAR 6 YEARS NEW 2 YEARS NEW 1 YEAR AUG. 26-27 MAY 13-14 JULY 22-23 APRIL 29-30 JULY 8-9 YES YES YES YES YES May 25,E A City of 2iermosaTeacly Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254.3885 Mayor June Williams & Members of the City Council Hermosa Beach City Hall Members of the City Council, At the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission meeting of last evening, the Commission made the following motion and requested I forward it to you: Motion: ." to request the City Council to include in their negotiations with the School District all available open space which will include the five lots at 4th. & Prospect, Hermosa View Field, South School and the School District's portion of Valley Park" Reviczky/Reznichek. All Ayes. The Commission feels it is very important that the City purchase all of the above in order to preserve what little open space is left in the community. Respectfully Submitted, GGA( _ ) Alana Mastrian-Handman Director CITY MANAGER COMMENT: Our communication with the School District has been consistent with the Commission's recommendation; however, the School District has not expressed an interest in selling Hermosa View and North School, and the City currently has no financial resources to accomplish. We will continue to discuss. Recommendation: Accept and file Commission's recommendation. 1p June 6, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of • the Hermosa Beach City Council June 13, 1989 ACCEPT WORK AS COMPLETE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH SLURRY SEAL AND AtSPHALT STREET REPAIR PROJECT CIP 88-170 AND CIP 88-171 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Accept as complete CIP 88-170 and 88-171, Slurry Seal and Asphalt Street Repair Projects, completed by Roy Allan Slurry Seal Inc. 2. Authorize staff to: A. Release the payment retention to Roy Allan Slurry Seal Inc. B. Release Roy Allan Slurry Seal Inc. from the faithful performance bond and the labor and materials bond. 3. Authorize staff to file a notice of completion. A. Accept, as complete, inspection and contract administration services provided by Harris & Associates. BACKGROUND: On October 25, 1989 Council awarded a contract to Roy Allan Slurry Seal Inc. for slurry sealing various streets and for construction of asphalt street repairs throughout Hermosa Beach. ANALYSIS: This section is divided as follows: 1. Construction A. Built according to Plans and Specifications B. Built within time schedule C. Notice of completion D. Release of Bond E. Final contract cost 2. Inspection 3. Fiscal Impact and Project Accounting Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 6, 1989 Page 2 1. Construction A. Built according to Plans and Specifications The project hats been built according to the plans and specifications prepared by staff and approved by Council. Harris & Associates has inspected the project for compliance with the Plans and Specifications and has provided written certification of compliance. B. Built within time schedule Forty-five calendar days were allowed for construction; the completion date on the notice to proceed was March 17, 1989; contract change orders added 39 days to the contract; thereby ,changing the completion date to April 25, 1989. The date of substantial completion was April 17, 1989, 8 days ahead of schedule. C. Notice of completion Staff recommends that a notice of completion be filed. D. Release of Bonds Pending City Council authorization, and after the notice of completion is recorded, staff will release Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. from the obligations of the following faithful performance and labor and materials bond: Bonding Company: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland Original Bond Amount: $128,951.00 Amount to be Released: $128,951.00 Bond No.: 30138146 Also, pending Council approval, the retention payment, in the amount of $14,892.47 will be released to Roy Allan Slurry Seal Inc., 35 days after recordation of the Notice of Completion (provided no stop notices or liens are received within that time period.) Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 6, 1989 Page 3 E. Final Project Cost . Below is a summary of final costs including retention for the project: Original Contrast Amount: $128,951.85 Chance Orders: CCO No. 1 add 24,809.80 CCO No. 2: A. Adjustment of quantities add 5,760.33 B. Credit deduct 1 059.72 ,Net change in contract amount add 29,510.41 Final Contract Cost $158.462.26 The final construction cost is within the project budget as amended on February 14, 1989. 2. Inspection Harris & Associates provided contract administration and inspection of the work. Harris & Associates identified items that required correction and provided written certification that all items have been corrected. Harris & Associates recommends acceptance of the works and filing of the Notice of Completion. Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 6, 1989 Page 4 3. Fiscal Impact and Project Accounting Below is a summary of project costs: Original Amended Final Not to exceed Not to exceed Contract Fund Description 10-25-89 02-14-89 Amount Construction CIP 87-170, Slurry Seal 93,620.00 93,620.00 94,368.07 CIP 87-171, Street Repairs 48,117.00, 75.408.00 64.094.19 Total Construction $131,737.00 $169,028.00 $158,46226 Inspection and Proiect Administration CIP 87-170, Slurry Seal 14,500.00 14,500.00 CIP 87-171, Street Repairs 7.302.00 7,302.00 Total $21,802.00 $21,802.00 A detailed report is on file in the Public Works Department. ALTERNATIVES: The other alternative considered by staff and available to Council is: Do not accept construction as complete. Respectfully submitted, Edgar E. Edwards Harris & Associates Noted for Fiscal Impact: C ony Antich Director of Public orks Concur: Viki Copeland Kevin Northcraft/ Finance Administrator City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Dalley Drive Hermosa Beach CA Dear City Council members: June 10, 1989 Please be advised that your decision to require that all Video rentals and sales (and consequently panographic "X" rated) in the entire City of Hemosa Beach be limited to the area around Pacific Coast Highway (3-C zone) shows a gross lack of sensiti- vity to the needs of all Hermosa Beach Taxpayers. With tha exception of Mr. Schubach's April 12th, 1989 obnoxious statement that "elimination...is necessary. It is believed by Staff that both C-1 and C-2 zones are in too close proximity to residential development," NO ONE has offered any reasonable explanation or justification in creating a "SLEEZY BATTLE ZONE" up along the highway. First of all how dare an elected official tell a citi- zen what can or can not be seen or purchased in our city. Fact.. the video store in question is separated From residences by at least a large half block and even further in the other direct- ions. The Staff and the City Council are Fully aware that several of the existing highway places like Music Plus, The Tinder Box and others have Hermosa Beach residences living in the same bldg, or in single family homes separated by only a small alley way. IF Councilmembers feel that grown up Hermosa Beach adults voted them into office because of their expert qualiF- cations in determining what we should or shouldn't see ...then by all means please direct your protection at all Hermosans and outlaw Films being sold near any taypayer or their Families. In addition I believe it's stupid to declare Pier Ave less of a commercial zone than PCH. My God the drunks are killing them - elves down at the beach bars. And how about the Tushery window displays with the skimpy underware,,,surely we'll need experts deciding when they'll have to move up to the Highway. And as I mentioned last week why build a dog run on the greenbelt when the highway is available and it's second class citizens won't mind. It's bad enough that we living around the highway Fail to get police vehicle patrols like they do in the beach areas but now we can have the pleasure of ALL the porno Freaks lurking in the neiborhoods day and night because their not wanted down with the better breed of Families. I will go along with text amendment 89-1 as I have with the ambulance sirens, the car alarm shops, the dirty streets, the noise From the Saloons, the obvious lack of Police patrols ...but next election I'll insist that you tell the highway voters that you really don't represent them quite the same as you do the swells From the beach side of the highway. June Williams Roger Creighton Jim Rosenberger Chuck Sheldon Etta Simpson Kcv;r Mormit-t'+. SR: .. ,-•-t . -t • • • . Richard J Sullivan 82Lk 3rd Street Hermosa Beach CA SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 2a May 31, 1989 City Council Meeting May 23, 1989 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 89-990 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO DELETE VIDEO SALES AND RENTALS IN THE C-1 AND C-2 ZONES, NEIGH- BORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 89-990 relating to the above subject. At the meeting of May 23, 1989, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: -Carrot Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams None None None Respectfully submitted, Lind evin B. North raft, City Manager /1g/1 Riddle, epu y ity Clerk CITY MANAGER COMMENT: City Attorney Remelmeyer was reviewing the legal aspects of this ordinance prior to his surgery. Following his surgery, he volunteered a suggestion that the Council may wish to defer action on this matter until a permanent City Attorney is selected and has reviewed. 2a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 89 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO DELETE VIDEO SALES AND RENTALS IN THE C-1 AND C-2 ZONES, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on May 23, 1989 to receive oral and written testimony on this matter and made the following Findings: A. Video sales and rentals of the "X" rated type are not similar in intensity to other uses within the C-1 and C-2 zones; B. A video sales and rental use will have a negative effect on other businesses in the C-1 and C-2 zones and/or adjacent uses if X-rated tapes are included; C. The City is preempted from banning X-rated videos when they are not the predominant use; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain the following text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and approve an Environmental Negative Declaration. Section 1. Amend the C-1, Neighborhood Commercial Zone Permitted Use List, Section 8-2, to eliminate the following: "Videocassette tape sales and rentals, except Adult, "X" rated type; Conditional Use Permit required subject to Section 10-2." Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Section 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1989. PRESIDENT o the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS . FORM: CITY CLERK -., CITY ATTORNEY t/ccorvfde Location a. Address: C-1 & C-2 zones b. Legal: 2. Description N/A Text amendment to eliminate video sales and/or rentals in C-1 & C-2 zonex 3. Sponsor a. Name: Planning Dept. City of Hermosa Beach b. Mailing Address: 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, Ca 90254 Phone: (213) 318-0242 NEGATIVE DECLARATION In accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City of Hermosa beach, which im- plements the California Environmental quality Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach, the Environmental Review Committee must make an environmental review of all private projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planning Commission must make an environmental review of all public projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, which are subject to the Environmental quality Act. This declaration is documentation of the review and, if'it be- comes final, no comprehensive Enviromnental Impact Report is required for this project. FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE _We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro- posed project in accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas- ures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation suPp. 'ng t finding is on file in the Building Department. 3-23-89 ��►� ` Date of Finding Chairman, Envir nmental Review Committee FINDING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro- ject in accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environ- mental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation measures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on the en- vironment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Build- ing Department. 2MLS Date of Finding Chaian, Planning Commission FINDING OF THE CITY COUNCIL We have undertaken and completed an environmental Impact Review of this pro- posed project in accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find this project does not require a comprehensive En- vironmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas- ures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on . the environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Building Department. Date of Finding Mayor, Hermosa Beach City Council May 22, 1989 FITME55 5Y5TEM5 The Honorable Mayor Williams and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Honorable Mayor Williams and Members of the City Council: Madam Mayor, these are the points that I wish to clarify and I need the assistance of the City Council. Problem: clarification of former letter (April 4, 1989); (A) I have a health center with retail and wholesale of physical health equipment, 1 block south of new location, 1106 Hermosa Avenue. (B) Entrance of facility, by appointment only. (C) Individually owned and operated. Individual therapy and training to correct or improve physical inadequacies. (E) I would like to contract with the parking district for validated parking in Lot (B) or (C). I am open to suggestions for any other available parking. (F) I would be keeping the same logo as my present business, expanding only to have some individual physical therapy. In order to expedite this project, 1 need the help_of the City Council to rent and improve the property at 1106 Hermosa Avenue. This project would be of benefit both, to myself and the City of Hermosa Beach. Sincerely, PULSE FITNESS SYST �-C v Shane McColgan 934 Hermosa Ave., Suite 11 • Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 379-9980 Food Writer Betty Evans Cook Books Cooking Classes June 7, 1989 Honorable Mayor and City Council; I was out of town when you had your meeting regarding the flood situation and the relation to the Power street development. I would like a few minutes on the June 13 agenda to show my photos of our flooded house. Thank you. Betty Evans JUN 0 6 1989 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 5 1769 Valley Park Ave., Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 379-5932 June 8, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of • Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 13, 1989 • TRACT 30896 APPROVAL OF THE GRADING PLAN, FOR AN EIGHT LOT SUBDIVISION COMMONLY KNOWN AS POWER STREET Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Require a subsequent environmental assessment. 2. Approve a one year extension of the tentative map. Background: On March 14, 1989, due to the late hour and an illness of the Public Works Director, City Council rescheduled the Power Street matter to 6 PM on March 21, 1989. On March 21, 1989, the Public Works Director recommended a continuance so that engineering concerns could be resolved. These engineering concerns related to the drainage. Analysis: The analysis is divided as follows: 1. The History of the Development 2. Subsequent Environmental Assessment Needed 3. Request by Developer for Time Extension 4. Summary 1. The History of the Development A revised grading plan was first considered by City Council on March 24, 1987. On January 26, 1988 the developer again asked for a revision to the grading plan. Attachment No. 1 is a chronology of this subdivision. 2. Subsequent Environmental Assessment Needed After review, staff and the City Attorney agree that a subsequent environmental assessment for the project is needed. Reasons for the subsequent environmental assessment are: 1. The change in grade 2. The hydrology error by the developers' engineer. 3. The County letter concerning the hydrology of the watershed. 5 The City Council has also expressed a concern about the County letter and scheduled the matter for a special meeting on June 1, 1989. Council considered but did not approve anurgency moratorium ordinance. The drainage concern by the County is a • health and safety matter.' 3. Request by Developer for Time Extension According to. the Planning Director, the tentative tract map expired on April 15, 1989 unless the developer requests, in writing, a sixty day exte Sion for appealing the expiration date beyond April 15, 1989 - this is a mandatory extension, not subject to Council approval. On April 6, 1989, the developer. requested a seven month postponement of the -expiration. A copy of the developer's request was forwarded to the City Attorney for comment and evaluation. Staff has interpreted this as an extension of time, (i.e. 60 days - June 14, 1989) and it is reasonable to grant a one year extension to June 14, 1990. 4. Summary • New information has been provided regarding the drainage in the watershed area. Until more work is performed I cannot recommend an approval of the tentative map or a change in the grading plan. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Consider a moratorium Respectfully submitted, Concur: 0142 �•/�`�' _ rim ony ntich " Sevin B. Northcraft Director of Public Works City Manager Attachments: Attachment No. 1 -Subdivision Chronology Attachment No. 2 -May 16, 1989 letter from Los Angeles County cc: Bill Grove, Building & Safety Director Michael Schubach, Planning Director Charles S. Vose, City Attorney Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger 396 Hayes Street San Francisco, CA 94102 Jim A. Marquez 1334 Parkview Avenue, Suite 100 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Westco Engineering 20710 S. Manhattan Place, #116 Torrance, CA 90501 Attn: Ed Saiki Hermosa Villa Homes Attn: Kavanaugh/Fabiano Isco Industries Attn: Ivano Stamegna• Timothy H. Zieman Clifford Fritch Warren Lombardi Guillermero Garcia R. Amyer Gordon Evans Michael Molen Byron Conroy Patrick Quigley Bill Bryson James Geraghty ATTACHMENT 1. SUBDIVISION CHRONOLOGICAL. • Listed below is the chronological of memoranda to City Council and subsequent actions: December 18, 1085: Letter from 'Mark J. Kavanaugh, Kavanaugh Development Co., Inc. requesting the vacation of a portion of Powers and 20th Street. January 14, 1986: Public Works Department memorandum to City Council titled "Request for Street Vacation -Power Street". Two resolutions were adopted as follows: Resolution No. 86-4901 establishing a policy on citizen initiated requests for vacation of public right-of-way, and Resolution No. 86-4902 directing the Planning Commission to review the proposed vacation and prepare a recommendation to City Council on this• matter. April 15, 1986: Planning Commission approves tentative tract 30986 for eight lot subdivision. May 27, 1986: Appealed to City Council - approved on appeal Resolution No. 86-4941 with amendment to allow curb cuts on east side of the street. May 27, 1986: Memorandum to City Council from the Public Works Department titled, "Resolution to Set a Public Hearing to Consider the Vacation of Portions of Power and 20th Streets in Conjunction with an Eight Lot Subdivision". Action: To continue to June 10, 1986. June 10, 1986: Memorandum to City Council from the Public Works Department titled "Power and 20th Street Vacations". (May. 27, 1986 memorandum above was an attachment to this item). Action to approve staff recommendation as follows: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 86-4945, A Resolution of the City Council declaring its intention to order the vacation of portions of Power Street and 20th Street. 2. Set July 22, 1986 as the date for a public hearing. July 22, 1986: Public Hearing at the regularly scheduled Council meeting. Memorandum from Planning Department, titled, "General Plan Amendments". Action: To approve staff recommendation 1. Resolution No. 86 -4964 --Allow a minimum of 1 dwelling unit per legal lot, and - 1 - 2. Resolution No. 86-4965 and adopt amendment to Circulation Element of General Plan --Delete portions of Power and 20th Street and relocate a portion of Power Street (approximately 95 feet to the east of the currently unimproved right-of-way) in conjunction with an 8 -unit subdivision, July 22, 1986: Public Hearing at the regularly scheduled Council meeting. Memorandum from the Public Works Department, titled, "Vacation of Portions of Power Street and 20th Street". Action to',approve staff recommendation which: 1. Adopted Resolution No. 86-4966 ordering the vacation of portions of Power and 20th Streets as herein described and as contemplated by Resolution No. 86-4945 adopted by Council on June. 10, 1986, and 2. Authorized the Mayor to sign a statement of negative declaration. February 10, 1987: Memorandum to City Council from the Planning Department titled "Environmental Assessment for Dwelling Unit Layout & Grading Plans for an Approved Eight Lot Subdivision at 532, 534-540 Twentieth Street as a Required Mitigation Measure for a Negative Declaration". Council action: Council requested that a revised grading plan consistent with tentative map or modified in some other fashion indicating other options. Adopt Resolution No. 87-5015. See attached 2/10/87 minutes. March 24, 1987: Memorandum to City Council from the Planning Department titled "Revised Grading Plan for 8 -lot Subdivision at 532, 534-540 Twentieth Street". Action to approve staff recommendation as folows: 1. All lot 5 retaining walls parallel to Power Street will be located a minimum of 45 feet from the front property line; 2. The small terraced areas located in the northwest corner of lots 6 & 7 shall be landscaped in a manner to as to minimize the visual impact of the retaining walls; 3. The soils report prepared for the project shall be amended to address the revised grading plan. 4. To adopt Resolution No. 87-5056 - A Resolution of the City of Hermosa Beach, Approving the Grading Plan for an Eight Lot Subdivision Located at 532, 534-540 Twentieth Street. December 15, 1987: Department titled, Accommodate Street Council Action was Memorandum to Council from the Public Works "Approval of Grading Plan Revision to Improvements 532, 534-540 Twentieth Street". to refer back to staff. January 26, 1988: Memorandum to City Council from James P. Lough, City Attorney, titled "Approval of Grading Plan Revision to accommodate Street Improvements at 532, 534-540/20th Street". Action was to approve staff recommendation as amended: 1. In approving the revision, the Public Works Director will be delegated the authority to meet with the engineers for the developer and County to approve corrections assuming that the grading plan meets all the necessary engineering requirements. The plan is to be referred back to City Council for final approval after review by the City Attorney. March 22,',1988: Memorandum to City Council from the Public Works Department, titled "Status Repott on Grading and Drainage for Tentative Tract #30986 located at 20th Street and Power Street", with recommendation to receive and file. April 5, 1988: Planning. Commission approved one year extension' of tentative map. October 25, 1988: (continued from 10/11/88): Memorandum to City Council from the Public Works Department, Approval of Hydrology Report and Grading Plan for an Eight Lot Subdivision..." Action: Item withdrawn. December 13, 1988: Memorandum to City Council from the Public Works Department titled, "Power Street Grading Plan". Action: Refer this matter to the Planning Commission. Authority for this decision is found in the Government Code -Subdivision Map Act. The Planning Commission is the designated body charged with the duty of making investigations and reports on design (Section 66415). Design means, among other things, drainage and grading (Section 66418). January 17, 1989: Planning Commission Meeting. Review of a Grading Plan for Power Street Subdivision, Tract No. 30986. Motion and second to recommend that the City Council approve this grading plan; and to include the following whereases: (1) Whereas, the grading plan is in substantial compliance with the original grading plan, with a maximum variation of no more than 16 inches; (2) Whereas, the french drain on the subject property will increase the percolation and decrease the potential of flooding; (3) Whereas, the storage and projectpipe will also decrease the potential flooding; (3) Whereas, the storage and project pipe will also decrease the potential flooding to the adjacent property; (4) Whereas, the blocking of water to the adjacent properties from the Power Street project to the houses on Valley Park is now being blocked, so that it will reduce the amount of water which enters into their property as well. Chmn. Pierce stated that, given that there is a maximum of 3.6 feet at one end from the existing grade and essentially zero at the other end, and it very rapidly goes from 3.6 feet to approximately less than two feet, he felt there is no difference between the existing grade and the grading plans that exist. February 14, 1989: Memorandum to City Council from Planning Department, titled, "Special Study 88-25 - - Review of Grading Plan for Power Street Subdivision, Tract No. 30986. Action: To continue to an adjourned meeting 6 PM on Tuesday, February 21, 1989. February 21, 1989: (continued from 2/14/89): Action; To continue this to 1st meeting in March (3/14/89) and to place this matter, before the public hearings on the agenda). March 14, 1989: Memorandum to City Council - Review of Grading Plan for Power Street Subdivision. Action: To schedule for next meeting; died for lack of second. 'Act'ion: Staff to schedule when ready. Notify' neighbors and attorney for H. V. Preservation Society. June 1, 1989: Special Meeting. Consideration of urgency moratorium on construction within the drainage area. COIINTY OF LOS ANGELFcS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS POO SOL TH FREMONT 4,1, EMI ALH.AMBRA. CALIFORNIA 9IN}13)1 Telephone: at 11 iq-5101 THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON. Director CEC1L E. SUCH. Chief Deputy Direct°, MAS MACAW. Assistant Director May 16, 1989 RECEIVED MAY 1 MIMIC Wnaue nF.PT. Mr. Tony Antich . Director of Public Works City of Hermosa Beach 1315 valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-0299 Dear Mr. Antich: "ATTACHMENT NO. 2" ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O. BOX 11411 ALHAMSRA. CALIFORNIA ♦1NI-11N IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE: • PD.6 810.33 MTD 1294 - TRACT 30986 (POWER STREET) Preliminary investigation into the adequacy of the existing storm drain system at this location indicates that the peak flow rates from a 50 -year frequency rainfall is 360 cfs and that the existing system will handle only about 120 cfs. This information is extracted from a 1973 study and, with new developments and more intensive land use, it is possible that the above peak flow rates may be understated. As you know, the area is in a sump and collects runoff from many directions. We believe a hydrology study is needed to clearly define the problems and recommend possible solutions. If you wish, we can do the study by Service Request. We estimate that the study will cost $5,000 and require about three months. After the study, a detailed design can be made to determine pipe sizes, catch basin locations and construction costs. If you want us to proceed with the hydrology study or have any ques- tions on this matter, please call Mr. Lynn Nicholson at (818) 458-3917. Very truly yours, T. Directpr Public Works . TIDEMANSON W. STONE ty Director LDN:pf/TR30986-3 June 6, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council June 13, 1989 SUBJECT: INTERIM ORDINANCE CONTROLLING R-2 DENSITY STANDARDS INITIATED BY• CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE:' TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF UNITS IN THE R-2 ZONE TO A MAXIMUM OF 2 UNITS'FOR LOTS OF 3,500 SQUARE FEET, OR GREATER, AND TO A MAXIMUM OF 1 UNIT FOR LOTS UNDER 3,500 SQUARE 1FEET UNLESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINES THAT ADDITIONAL UNITS MAY BE ALLOWED, BUT NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL EXCEED 25 UNITS PER ACRE. Recommendation Adopt the attached interim ordinance. Background At the May 9, 1989 meeting, the City Council requested staff to prepare an interim ordinance as a result of concern for controlling density on large lots, or where lots might be assembled resulting in more allowable units. Analysis The proposed ordinance is intended to control density on R-2 zoned lots until the Planning staff has an opportunity to study the density issue through the current General Plan revision program. This interim ordinance is pursuant to 65858(b) which allows for a maximum of a two year time period, with a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council, rather than a one year period. The interim ordinance is not designed to allow higher densities than the current code; it controls the number of units per lot when a proposal would result in more than 2 units per lot. It, thereby, gives the Planning Commission discretionary approval so that such standards as more setback, open space, parking spaces, and less lot coverage can be imposed as a means to allow the additional units. This concept is similar to granting the zone change at 540 and 603 1st street from M-1 to Specific Plan Area. Staff would expect that, if a developer was willing to meet the imposed conditions of the Planning Commission, then, additional units could be constructed. For example, a developer assembles three lots totaling 12,250 square feet, a total of six units (2 per lot) could be constructed without any discretionary review. However, 7 units (equaling the allowed 25 units per acre) could - 1 - 9 1 be constructed with Planning Commission approval. The Planning Commission could impose reasonable standards to minimize the impact of the higher density. The standards to be imposed by the Planning Commission would generally be more parking, less lot coverage, larger. setbacks. However, some standards should be tailored on a case by case basis. Also, there is an development can be appealed to the City Council. appeal procedure provided so that a CONCUR: evin B. Nort+raft City Manager t/srccorr2 2 proposed ichae'I Schubach Planning Director 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 89 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM ORDINANCE CONTROLLING DENSITY ON R-2 ZONED LOTS WHEN THE NUMBER OF UNITS EXCEEDS A MAXIMUM OF TWO UNITS PER EXISTING LOT FOR LOTS. OF 3,500 SQUARE FEET OR GREATER, AND/OR WHEN THE NUMBER OF UNITS EXCEEDS MORE THAN ONE UNIT PER LOT ON ASSEMBLED LOTS OF UNDER 3,500 SQUARE FEET WITHOUT PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND APPROVAL. WHEREAS, The City Council held a public hearing, and made the following Findings: 0 • A. Density level in each zone requires a study via the General Plan update;. B. During the period of study, to control a potential proliferation of over -dense projects, an interim ordinance is necessary to protect the immediate threat to the health, safety and welfare of the public; C. Section.65858 of the Government Code authorizes the adoption of an interim ordinance as an emergency measure which can act to prevent conflicts with the contemplated proposal that the City Council has directed the Planning Commission to study; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain the following: Section 1. No building permits shall be issued or Conditional Use Permits granted within the R-2 zone for more than two (2) units per legal lot of 3,500 square feet or greater, except when the Planning Commission determines that more units may be allowed subject to the imposition of conditions and where the density will not exceed the maximum twenty-five (25) units per acre. Section 2. No building permits or Conditional Use Permits shall be issued in the R-2 zone for more than one (1) unit per lot for lots under 3,500, or two (2) units per lot for lots 3,500 square feet or greater when said lots are assembled for development except when the Planning Commission determines that more units may be allowed subject to the imposition of conditions, and density will not exceed the maximum of twenty-five (25) units per acre. Section 3. A public hearing shall be held in accordance with procedures set forth in City Council Resolution 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 78-4237 prior to the Planning Commission rendering its decision. Section 4. All decisions of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council within 10 days of the Planning Commission's decision. Section 5. Where a Conditional Use Permit' isrequired for Condominimum development, the Planning Commission may grant the higher density in conjunction with the Conditional Use Permit approval. When no Conditional Use Permit is required, the same fee as required for Environmental Staff Review and Conditional Use Permits • shall be imposed: Section 6. The granting of additional units, not to exceed the maximum of twenty-five (25) units per acre allowed by the General Plan, and zoning -ordinance, shall -'not be construed as a variance running with the land and if the General Plan is amended in the future to lower the allowed density, then such units may become non -conforming. Section 7. This ordinance is effective for a period of forty-five (45) days from today's date unless extended pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section •65858. Section 8. The staff shall draft a report for presentation to the public at its second regular meeting in July, 1989. Such report shall state what steps are being taken by the City to correct the problems referenced in this ordinance and what steps are planned to be taken in the future to remedy this situatin. Section 9. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinance of said City, shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THIS DAY OF JUNE, 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY T/ORDCC613 - 2 June 8, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach Police Department of June 13, 1989 REVIEW OF USE OF MOTORCYCLES FOR TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council review the attached in- formation and decide on future use of motorcycles by our Police Department from among the three alternative recommendations, as follows: 1) Discontinue use of motorcycles while directing that there should be no lessening of traffic enforcement priority by our enforcement officers. 2) Direct the continued limited use of motorcycles for traffic enforcement by directing that staff prepare a policy desig- ned to limit the hazard exposure to officers assigned to motors by such things as r t is to_be rrAr,rjut-,t' '- by motors, documenting and man- dating beginning and ongoing training programs, first class equipment and maintenance programs, and strong supervision procedures; and authorize $13,025 from Prospective Expendi- tures for the purchase of two motorcycles. 3) Authorize a continuation of the existing program of two motorcycle officers, and authorize $13,025 from Prospective Expenditures for the purchase of two motorcycles. Background: Due to the City's history of injuries related to the Police Department's use of motorcycle equipment, and the current need for a capital expenditure to purchase at least two new motorcy- cles, it is appropriate that a review be taken of the current policy. Accordingly, I deferred recommending replacement of the motorcycles until we had obtained department and officer input on the appropriateness of our motor patrol, along with an analysis of our experience, for presentation to the City Council. This memo is intended to provide that information to the Council, al- though it clearly is not an exhaustive use of motorcycle uses by police departments in the United States. The issues involved are complex, and different views depending on the evaluation of the various factors result in different staff opinions. This report attempts to provide all those views. Analysis: Officer input - A survey of our police officers was conducted to get input as to the use of motorcycles by our Police Department. Attachment 1 reflects the results of that survey, which indicates 11 that most officers would like to have the option to use motorcy- cles or cars for traffic enforcement. Costs - While costs are a factor, they are not the principal determination of this matter. It is estimated that motors save $7,000 per year in vehicle cost and $2,000 per year in operating costs over a police car. The additional salary paid to officers and additional equipment costs $3,500.00 per year for a motorcy- cle officer. There is evidence also that motorcycle enforcement will result in more ticket revenue, although information is sketchy. The Chief in Attachment 2 indicates that motorcycle officers can be as much as 50% more effective than traffic en- forcement officers in cars. However, the City had assigned an officer in a police car to strictly traffic enforcement in Decem- ber, 1988 and January, 1989. During that time the officer wrote 250 traffic citations as opposed to 225 for one motor officer and 159 for the other. It should be noted that the motor officers did conduct other activities than traffic enforcement, while the officer in the police car was assigned strictly to work traffic. Regarding injury costs, our experience has reflected a much high- er incidence of injuries and worker's comp. costs when officers are assigned to motors. Our experience reflects that an officer assigned to motors will have an injury accident every 5.4 years, as opposed to one every 47.6 years when assigned to cars. Fur- ther, our worker's comp costs when assigned to motors histori- cally is $12,500 per year, as opposed to $236.00 per year when assigned to police cars. Hazards - The issue the Council is faced with is a rare one that will directly affect the dangers a police officer confronts in his or her already hazardous job. Based on the record in our City, I would have to agree with the Chief when he indicates that it is not "if" an accident will occur on motors, it is "when and how bad". If history is a predicter of our future, we can expect an injury to one of our two motor officers every 2.7 years. Since our average worker's comp cost has been $12,500 per year, the worker's comp costs on a injury occurring every 2.7 years historically would cost $34,000, so would likely be severe. Given this negative history and the continuing high traffic vo- lumes in our community, it is clear that we will likely be re- quired to visit hospital rooms and/or attend funerals over the next five to ten years if we continue motorcycle patrols. Despite the positive benefits of motorcycle patrols, I cannot balance the benefits with the high likelihood of injury or death to our police officers. I would instead recommend that the Coun- cil consider challenging the department to do outstanding traffic enforcement with police cars, and eliminate our motorcycle use based on the history and the lack of likelihood that our histori- cal experience will change. Alternative Recommendation - If the Council, in its best judg- ment, determines that uses of motorcycles are really a necessary part of our traffic enforcement program, in the alternative I would recommend that the Council restrict use of motorcycles from high volume roads (where four out of five of our motorcycle in- juries have occurred), mandate the best safety and motorcycle equipment available, require both beginning and mandatory monthly training, and establish a strong supervisory procedure. These areas, while not eliminating the increased risk, might be effec- tive in reducing the potential for future accidents and injuries. evin B. Northcraft City Manager KBN/ld cc: Public Safety Director TO: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager DATE: May 2, 1989 SUBJECT: Motorcycles --to keep or not to keep FROM: Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety ******************************************************************************* ******************************************************************************* The final tabulation from the officer survey regarding the use of motorcycles is as follows: Discontinue use of motorcycles as traffic units - 5.7% (2) Continue use of motorcycles only, as traffic units - 11.4% (4) Use a combination of motorcycles and cars as traffic units - 82.9% (29) 100.0% (35) This survey points out what we knew all along, many officers would like to work traffic and have the choice of riding a motorcycle or driving a car. Most departments are going to this type of deployment for their traffic units because it allows flexibility and choice. Even though there is an increased likelihood of injury to the officer, a police motorcycle is better suited for some enforcement objectives than a police car and there are many instances when a motorcycle is invaluable, such as working enforcement along the Strand, being able to manuever during very conjested conditions in order to enforce traffic laws and to reach accidents, and to escort and control special events and activities. This department, like many others, has historically deployed all of its traffic detail on motorcycles. This is not always ideal because there are some officers who really like to work traffic, but are not enthused about riding a motorcycle. Because of this, we had planned to deploy our traffic detail by using a com- bination of 2 motorcycles and 2 traffic cars. This would allow the flexibility that a motorcycle offers and would allow those officers who don't like to ride a motorcycle a chance to work in the traffic unit. Unfortunately, the 5 motorcycles that we have are, to say the least, down and out. Three of them have been used for parts to keep the other two running, but those two, which are 1982 models, have now reached the end of the line. They need major repair which would not be cost effective considering the condition they are in. We are rehabing the 2 old 1983 patrol cars for use as traffic units, but need to have the two motorcycles. Without the vehicles, our plans to aggressively address the enforcement of traffic laws is going to fall short. In other words, we need the equipment to do the job It is respectfully requested that approval be granted for the purchase of two d # /, � f / motorcycles at $13,025. April 25, 1989 To: Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety From: Commander Anthony Altfeld Field Services Division Subject: Police Motorcycle Status Fye Officer Eckert's police motorcycle was placed out of service on Thursday, April 20, 1989 due to a variety of mechanical problems. As a result, Officer Eckert has been relegated to accomplishing his directed traffic enforcement objectives in a police car. As we have discussed before, our ability to impact citizen and City Council requests for directed traffic enforcement in specific areas of the community is directly and severely impacted by our access to the police motorcycle as one means and an option of accomplishing these objectives. Officer Eckert has advised me that his motorcycle will be out of service for as long as two weeks from date of this memo. Traffic enforcement objectives will be impacted as well as productivity statistics. The costs of repair are becoming exceedingly high and is balanced inappropriately against the costs and reason of purchasing a new police motorcycle. Whether we like it or not, a police motorcycle is better suited for some enforcement objectives than a police car. As long as Officer Eckert is forced to ride a police motorcycle which is mechanically deficient and unsafe, Officer Eckert's safety is placed at risk and the department will be unable to accomplish the degree of directed traffic enforcement which I believe is n=ces:ary and which I understand the City Council expects. C.":n•er ' ton '• ltfeld Field Ser es Di ision Hermosa Be= h Police Department 1 June 5, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 13, 1989 RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE USE OF MOTORCYCLES FOR TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT AND TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS AND AUTHORIZE REPLACEMENT OF TWO MOTORCYCLES IN FY 89-90 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Approve the continued use of motorcycles to work traffic enforcement; and 2. Appropriate necessary funds in the FY 89-90 budget to replace two motorcycles. BACKGROUND: Following the recent motorcycle accident involving Officer Lewis, the City Manager requested that we assess the value of continued use of motorcycles in traffic enforcement. A survey of the department regarding the use of motorcycles was conducted with the following results: Use a combination of motorcycles and cars as traffic units - 82.9% (29) Continue use of motorcycles only, as traffic units - 11.4% (4) Discontinue use of motorcycles as traffic units - 5.7% (2) 100.0% (35) This survey pointed out what we knew all along, many officers would like to work traffic and have the choice of riding a motorcycle or driving a car. Most departments are going to this type of deployment for their traffic units because it allows flexibility and choice. Even though there is an increased likelihood of injury to the officer, a police motorcycle is better suited for some enforcement objectives than a police car and there are many instances when a motorcycle is invaluable, such as working enforcement along the Strand, being able to manuever during very conjested conditions in order to enforce traffic laws and to reach accidents, and to escort and control special events and activities. This department, like many others, has historically deployed all of its traffic detail on motorcycles. This is not always ideal because there are some officers who really like to work traffic, but are not enthused about riding a motorcycle. d*citti €1; f Because of this, we had planned to deploy our traffic detail by using a com- bination of 2 motorcycles and 2 traffic cars. This would allow the flexibility that a motorcycle offers and would allow those officers who don't like to ride a motorcycle a chance to work in the traffic unit. Unfortunately, the 5 motorcycles that we have are, to say the least, down and out. Three of them have been used for parts to keep the other two running, but those two, which are 1982 models, have now reached the end of the line. They need major repair which would not be cost effective considering the condition they are in. We are rehabing the 2 old 1983 patrol cars for use as traffic units, but need to have the two motorcycles. Without the vehicles, our plans to aggressively address the enforcement of traffic laws is going to fall short. ANALYSIS: A comparison of the productivity of motor officers -vs- officers in patrol vehicles is as follows: PATROL TRAFFIC # of Cites - Officers # Of Cites - Officers APRIL 252 (24) 119 (1) MARCH 188 (19) 63 (1) FEBRUARY 116 (19) 85 (1) JANUARY '89 260 (21) 204 (2) DECEMBER 351 (21) 180 (2) NOVEMBER 153 (20) 300 (2) OCTOBER 194 (22) 141 (2) SEPTEMBER 208 (22) 193 (2) 8 month total 1,722 (21.0 avg.) 1,285 (1.625 avg.) During this eight month period, the 2 officers assigned to traffic in early September worked all traffic related matters, conducted follow-up investigation on hit and run accidents, answered calls for service, worked directed patrol activities, attended 2 weeks of training, and were used to run many errands in addition to working traffic enforcement. The traffic unit was reduced to one officer in February following an accident. Even with all of these additional duties and the reduction in staffing, the two officers in traffic produced 46.6% of the total citations written for the eight month period. They wrote an average of 642 citations each compared to the patrol officers who averaged only 82 each for the same period. While this information shows that a traffic unit is much more productive in traffic enforcment than the patrol unit, it does not really address the issue of whether a car is better than a motorcycle or vice -versa. Many studies have been conducted by other departments to address this topic. One of those was conducted by the Los Angeles Police Department. Their study revealed that 1) Motorcycle Officers issued nearly 50 percent more traffic cita- tions than traffic enforcement officers in cars; 2) injury and fatal traffic accidents increased at a disproportionate rate in areas deploying automobiles; 2 3) preventable officer -involved traffic accidents were significantly higher for officers in automobiles; 4) motorcycles are more cost effective than motor vehicles, a motorcycle can be operated for approximately $1,050 per year as opposed to $3,150 for a motor vehicle, a motorcycle costs $6,500 as opposed to $14,000 for a patrol vehicle; and 5) the motorcycle is more maneuverable, allowing officers to reach accident scenes and respond to calls during very congested traffic. If anyone had been in the area during the recent street fair, the problems of traffic congestion and response to calls for service could have been seen first hand. This is a common occurrance during rush hour traffic each week day and during the weekend when the beach crowd comes to town. Of course, the issue of officer safety is always a primary concern in deploying motorcycles. Having had motorcycles in every department that I have served as Chief of Police for, I can say from experience that officers do get injured on motorcycles and accidents are a fact of life. It's not a matter of 'if' and accident is going to occur, just 'when and how bad'. However, this could also be said of officers in patrol units, officer involved shootings, and all other aspects of the business. From experience, I can state that there are many more accidents involving offi- cers in patrol vehicles than on motorcycles. Here in Hermosa Beach, we have had two officers injured badly on motorcycles and one killed. One of the injured officers has come back and is performing well, the other will be back in the near future. On the other hand, we have had several officers injured in vehicle accidents. One went out on medical disability because of injuries received and another is seeking medical retirement citing an accident injury to his neck as partial cause. Additionally, we have officers injured frequently while making arrests and having to scuffle with the suspect. Some have been severe, others rather minor. The bottom line is...Officers can and will get injured in Police work; in order to reduce the possiblity and extent, we provide the officers with adequate training, proper supervision and, safe equipment to work with. The officer survey conducted, shows that 94% of the officers feel that motor- cycle deployment should be continued. Many of the officers have indicated that morale and department pride will be affected if the motors are taken out of operation. It is our conclusion that the Department must have the option and flexibility to deploy traffic officers on motorcycles and we must increase the number of offi- cers assigned to work traffic exclusively, if we are to achieve the goals of reducing traffic accidents through increased enforcement as specified in the traffic study conducted by the Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley. CONCUR: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager 3 ful eve S. 'sniewski i tted , Director of Public Safety CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM May 20, 1989 TO: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager(�1�I� FROM: Robert A. Blackwood, Risk Manager I''�'" SUBJECT: Police Motorcycles - Injuries I have researched the Workers' Compensation files and loss runs for the period January 1, 1982 to present to determine the cost to date for injuries resulting from on -duty motorcycle injuries. I was able to identify the following costs: EMPLOYEE: D.O.I.: COST TO DATE: Wolcott, Paul 06/20/82 $113,518 Moss, Gary 06/20/82 $ 25,000 (resulted in death) Rickey, Dave 08/11/83 $ 8,800 Lewis, Charles 02/02/89 $ 68,000 (reserved at $191,000) Eckert, Tom 04/06/89 $ 500 TOTAL: $215,818 (3 '/�• ) AVG/YR: $ 30,831 I was unable to identify costs for injuries prior to 1982. The number of motor officers assigned has changed as follows: July 1980 - June 1986 ---- 1 Sergeant 3 Officers July 1986 - Jan. 1987 1 Sergeant Jan. 1987 - Jan. 1989 NONE 47,-V. 1981r 2 Officers liae--/m 3 1 - June 8, 1989 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Upon review was able to Officer Allen, D: Odum, J: Bohlin, T: Mebius, J: Mitchell, K: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM Kevin B. Northcraft, City Mananger Robert A. Blackwood, Risk Mananger Vehicle accidents involving injuries Police Personnel (non -motors} of the loss runs for workers' compensation claims, I indentify the following losses: Date of injury Amount paid 02/28/86 03/19/87 04/14/87 06/29/87 03/01/89 TOTAL: AVG/YR: $11,193 $44,160 $ 664 $ 81 $ 151 $56,249 $14,062 (86-89) AVG. OFFICERS - 340 HERMOSA BEACH MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENTS VS POLICE CAR ACCIDENTS, 1. 1982-89 # OF INJURY ACCIDENTS 2. 1982-89 WORKERS' COMP. LOSSES 3. MAN-YEARS (# OF OFFICERS ASSIGNED TIMES 7 YEARS) 4. MAN-YEARS PER INJURY (LINE 3 DIVIDED BY LINE 1) 5. WORKERS' COMP LOSSES PER MAN-YEAR (LINE 2 DIVIDED BY LINE 3) 1982-89 MOTORS CARS 5 5 $338,818 $56,249 27 238 5.4 47.6 $12,500 $ 236 SUMMARY - Between 1982-89, in Hermosa Beach, a motorcycle unit consisting of two officers would sustain an injury accident every 2.7 years at a workers' compensation cost of $25,000 per year. If in police cars, they would sustain an injury accident every 24 years at a cost of $500 per year. PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MULTI-PURPOSE Honorable Councilmembers: We live near Gould Avenue and are impacted by noise, air pollution and property damage from the traffic theron. We feel that reducing the speed and volume of the traffic will reduce the noise, property damage, and the severity of accidents a measureable amount. Those of us who have signed below and initialed the column "motors - yes" would like you to include $27,000 in your new budget for four police motorcycles, so that we may have adequate traffic enforcement on the streets of Hermosa. We do recognize that motorcycles are many times more dangerous than patrol cars, and that the resulting injuries are costly in many ways, but we feel that as long as the officers ride voluntarily we should continue to fund motorcycles. Those of us who have signed below and initialed the column "speed - 25" would like you to remove Gould Avenue from the Federal Aid map and define it as a local street so that a 25 mph speed limit can be posted, and enforced with radar. We also ask you to direct that this objective be placed in the new general plan now being drawn. Many of us also signed the October 1988 petition which made this same request. Those of us who have signed below and initialed the column "2 lefts - yes" would like you to do all you can to get CalTrans to convert the present #1 westbound lane on westbound Artesia at PCH to a second non -optional left turn lane. We also ask you to direct that this objective be placed in the new general plan now being drawn. Thank you. Jk 1 C S co.f/oeic' n1C 7 /C .fie" .7 (e4 (.0,4./644_ ?o e ©eS c MerieSet., l��try t fvt (L33v,-ifp, S �� i�rcfm / Wade AYeK., 3340Lad ref"-, iq 6/11/ /46, l,V Dr! 4 Al kW 6,33 h4U tx. /-4 . - ' Motors Speed 2 lefts yes no 25 35 yes no apt I y - 0 g 2 9ti PK ItA SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1 PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MULTI-PURPOSE Honorable Councilmembers: We live near Gould Avenue and are impacted by noise, air pollution and property damage from the traffic theron. We feel that reducing the speed and volume of the traffic will reduce the noise, property damage, and the severity of accidents a measureable amount. Those of us who have signed below and initialed the column "motors - yes" would like you to include $27,000 in your new budget for four police motorcycles, so that we may have adequate traffic enforcement on the streets of Hermosa. We dc recognize that motorcycles are many times more dangerous than patrol cars, and that the resulting injuries are costly in many ways, but we feel that as long a. the officers ride voluntarily we should continue to fund motorcycles. Those of us who have signed below and initialed the column "speed - 25" would like you to remove Gould Avenue from the Federal Aid map and define it as a local street so that a 25 mph speed limit can be posted, and enforced with radar. We also ask you to direct that this objective be placed in the new general plan now being drawn. Many of us also signed the October 1988 petition which made this same request. Those of us who have signed below and initialed the column "2 lefts - yes" woul . like you to do all you can to get CalTrans to convert the present #1 westbound lane on westbound Artesia at PCH to a second non -optional left turn lane. We also ask you to direct that this objective be placed in the new general plan no.. being drawn. Thank you. •\.1V1 --(4-4-t4%. NA,/ q¢ a. fr e7 ('-0 c, t o ( � u r AiNtYY() Gc'7 au IS int F4frn1 sQ ✓ . �. /4 /16!��5�/i 4;CS %o � : cAz Motors Speed 2 lefts yes no 25 35 yes no b -i1-3 f 'Trt4t2 • ({4_47n,c,;04 CC, t/ 600 7 F-sj-te ��.� ! �►� Spjjt ' ro.3s—oc41c—J 022 ✓_ `A‘Kt 6DuiA ,31-Sct9 l r /1`6 2 7 ( cEsre /fA / c /lac Ivo L:S Ili/g5 60(43 j7o'( 61°657( 3 PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MULTI-PURPOSE Honorable Councilmembers: We live near Gould Avenue and are impacted by noise, air pollution and propert damage from the traffic theron. We feel that reducing the speed and volume of the traffic will reduce the noise, property damage, and the severity of accidents a measureable amount. Those of us who have signed below and initialed the column "motors - yes" would like you to include $27,000 in your new budget for four police motorcycles, so that we may have adequate traffic enforcement on the streets of Hermosa. We dc recognize that motorcycles are many times more dangerous than patrol cars, and that the resulting injuries are costly in many ways, but we feel that as long a- the officers ride voluntarily we should continue to fund motorcycles. Those of us who have signed below and initialed the column "speed - 25" would like you to remove Gould Avenue from the Federal Aid map and define it as a local street so that a 25 mph speed limit can be posted, and enforced with radar. We also ask you to direct that this objective be placed in the new general plan now being drawn. Many of us also signed the October 1988 petition which made this same request. Those of us who have signed below and initialed the column "2 lefts - yes" woul,-: like you to do all you can to get CalTrans to convert the present #1 westbound lane on westbound Artesia at PCH to a second non -optional left turn lane. We also ask you to direct that this objective be placed in the new general plan nom being drawn. Thank you. Motors Speed 2 lefts yes no 25 35 yes no 7 (4111•40144- aC93 3 eV C.�. • L % PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MULTI-PURPOSE Honorable Councilmembers: We live near Gould Avenue and are impacted by noise, air pollution and property damage from the traffic theron. We feel that reducing the speed and volume of the traffic will reduce the noise, property damage, and the severity of accidents a measureable amount. Those of us who have signed below and initialed the column "motors - yes" would like you to include $27,000 in your new budget for four police motorcycles, so that we may have adequate traffic enforcement on the streets of Hermosa. We de recognize that motorcycles are many times more dangerous than patrol cars, and that the resulting injuries are costly in many ways, but we feel that as long a- the officers ride voluntarily we should continue to fund motorcycles. Those of us who have signed below and initialed the column "speed - 25" would like you to remove Gould Avenue from the Federal Aid map and define it as a local street so that a 25 mph speed limit can be posted, and enforced with radar. We also ask you to direct that this objective be placed in the new general plan now being drawn. Many of us also signed the October 1988 petition which made this same request. Those of us who have signed below and initialed the column "2 lefts - yes" woul:�. like you to do all you can to get CalTrans to convert the present #1 westbound lane on westbound Artesia at PCH to a second non -optional left turn lane. We also ask you to direct that this objective be placed in the new general plan now being drawn. Thank you. i a70 CZ lam'. 6- (3.- '7 /6g,,A/ (7;;zei ,;1;" 39 6 ea 2 T4-/2. • /474i-4 5 t Ejr 67-e T N,tl C� L / 77 ,r'/Y " $ i ,c/z) Zi GAYa Trill C£ Motors Speed 2 lefts yes no 25 35 V ye no V/ V ✓ i� .± V z/ Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 23, 1989 Regular Meeting of June 13, 1989 PUBLIC HEARING HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1989-1990 • Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council introduce the attached ordinance which: 1) confirms the report of the Director of Public Works dated April 18, 1989, prepared pursuant to Resolution No. 89-5259 of said Council and the plans, specifications, estimates, diagrams and assessment, and 2) orders certain Crossing Guard Maintenance Services to be furnished and maintained for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989. Background: The Crossing Guard Maintenance District was voted on at the Special Municipal Election of November 8, 1983. The measure was an advisory vote, which is not binding and the measure passed by a 2-1 margin. As required, the necessary steps have been taken for the preparation of the public hearing set for June 13, 1989 for the adoption of the City's Crossing Guard Maintenance District, as follows: 1) March 14, 1989 - City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-5241 ordering the report for the renewal of the district. 2) April 18, 1989 City Clerk the and assessment 3) April 25, 1989 - The Director of Public Works filed with the report consisting of estimate of costs, maps, rolls. a. City Council adopted Resolution No. report. b. City Council adopted Resolution No. of intention) which set the date of June 13, 1988 at 8:00 p.m. in order on this matter. 89-5259, approving the 89-5260, (a resolution the public hearing for to accept public input Analysis: The Government Code provides authority for this assessment. The adoption of the attached ordinance provides the funds necessary to sustain the City's Crossing Guard Maintenance District. Funds.to operate and maintain the Crossing Guards are provided via an annual assessment. The annual assessment for FY 89-90 is as follows: Amount Percent Increase FY 88-89 $74,733.04 FY 89-90 $75,183.00 .6% The assessment for FY 89-90 is $449.96 more than FY 88-89. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Let the District lapse; thereby, increasing the General Fund obligation by approximately $74,733. Respectfully Submitted, Concur: Ant !o'ny ntich Levin B. Northcr. ft City Manager Director of Pub is Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copland Finance Administrator Attachments: Estimate of Costs FY 89-90 Ordinance No. 89- cg/pwclerk HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1989-90 FY 88-89 Actual July 1, 1988 Fund Balance $ 18,822 Estimated FY 88-89 Revenue 79,491 * Estimated FY 88-89 Expenditure (thru 6-30-89) 59,100 * Estimated Fund Balance June 30, 1989 39,213 ** * Based on mid -year 2/28/89 report ** Mid -year FY 89-90 Estimated Fund Balance July 1, 1990 NET ASSESSMENT FOR FY 89-90 Estimated FY 89-90 Expenditure Estimated June 30, 1990 Balance hbcgs 4/13/88 $ 39,213 75,183 62,980 51,416 .HERMOSA-BEACH CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1989-1990 ESTIMATE OF COST FY 1989-1990 1. Direct Expenses: Total Regular Salaries/Miscellaneous $ 11,876 Regular Salries/Safety 0 Special Duty Pay 0 Vacation/Sick Pay Off 238 Accrual Cash In 238 Crossing Guards 33,321 Retirement 2,731 Uniforms 1,000 Employee Benefits 876 Contract Services/Private: - Assessment Engineering Services 4,400 Contract Services/Government: - L.A. Co. Collections of Assessments 500 Subtotal: $ 58,480 2. Incidental Expenses: City Manager Administration $ 500 City Council Administration 500 Engineering Department 2,500 Legal Expense 500 City Clerk Expense 500 Subtotal: $ 4,500 Total Costs for Crossing Guards District No. 89-90: $ 62,980 hbcgs 4/13/89 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,, • 3 CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATED APRIL 18, 1989 PREPARED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 89-5241 4 AND APPROVED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 89-5259 OF.SAID COUNCIL, AND THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ESTIMATE, DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT 5 CONTAINED IN SAID REPORT; ORDERING CERTAIN CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED AND MAINTAINED FOR THE 6 FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, . 7 HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1989-1990 8 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, 9 California, did in Resolution No. 89-5241 of said Council, 10 pursuant to the provisions of the "Crossing Guard Maintenance 11 District Act of 1974" (Chapter 3.5, Article 2, 3 and 4, Sections 12 55530 through 55570, of the Government Code of the State of 13 California), require the Director of Public Works of said City to 14 make and file with the Clerk of the City Council a report in 15 writing, presenting certain matters relating to the proposed 16 Crossing Guard Maintenance District No. 1989-1990, as 17 contemplated under the provisions of said Act; and 18 WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works, pursuant to the 19 requirements of said City Council as expressed in Resolution No. 20 89-5241 and did on the 18th day of April, 1989, file in the 21 office of the City Clerk (who is ex -officio Clerk of .the City 22 Council) of said City, his report in writing responsive to the 23 requirements of said Resolution No. 98-5241 and as contemplated 24 under the provisions of said Act; and 25 WHEREAS, the said City Council did in Resolution No. 89-5259 26 approve said report on the 25th day of April, 1989, in conformity 27 with the provisions of said Act; and 28 WHEREAS, said City Council did thereafter and on said 25th 1 2 3 5 day of April, 1989, pass its Resolution of Intention No. 89-5260 declaring its intention to order certain Crossing Guard Maintenance Services for the fiscal year. beginning July 1, 1989; and 0 WHEREAS, said City Council did on said 25th day of April, 6 1989in its Resolution No. 98-5260 fix and designate Tuesday, the 7 13thday of June, 1989, at the hour of 8:00 p.m. of said day as 8 the time for hearing protests in reference to the proposed 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 maintenance and assessment, at the Council Chamber, in the City Hall, Civic Center, in the City of Hermosa Beach, California; an WHEREAS, at the time and place above stated for hearing protests in reference to the proposed maintenance and assessment certain written and oral protests and objections were filed and presented, which said protests and objections were fully and regularly heard and considered by said Council; and WHEREAS, said City Council being fully advised in the premises, does hereby proceed as follows: NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, FIND, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That said Council does hereby deny all protests and objections and does hereby approve, confirm and adopt the said report of said Director of Public Works dated the 18th day of April, 1989, and does hereby approve and confirm the assessment proposed for said proposed maintenance as set forth and referred to in said report, which said report is now on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City, open to inspection, hereby referred to and made a part thereof; and said City Counci 1 does hereby also confirm and adopt the respective instruments 2 therein contained and designated therein as SPECIFICATIONS, 3 DIAGRAM AND PLAN NO. 1989-1990, Estimate of Costs and Assessment, 4 all of which, on file as aforesaid, are hereby incorporated 5 herein and made a part hereof. 6 SECTION 2. That said Council does hereby order the said 7 contemplated maintenance to be made in accordance with the said 8 PLAN and SPECIFICATIONS therefor, so adopted and approved, and 9 does hereby order and determine that the fiscal year referred to 10 in said Resolution of Intention No. 89-5260 shall be and the same 11 is hereby fixed and established as the period commencing on the 12 1st day of July, 1989, and ending on the 30th day of June, 1990, 13 both dates inclusive, as therein set forth; and said Council does 14 hereby levy the said proposed total assessment made to cover the 15 costs and expenses of said improvement upon the respective 16 several subdivisions of land in the assessment district described 17 in said Resolution of Intention No. 89-5260 and as fixed and 18 determined by said report, dated April 18, 1989, and the proposed 19 assessment, filed therewith, as aforesaid, in the office of the 20 City Clerk of said City, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 21 1989and ending June 30, 1990 both dates inclusive. _ 22 SECTION 3. That the City Council hereby orders and directs 23 the City Treasurer to establish a special fund entitled, "Hermosa 24 Beach Crossing Guard Maintenance District No. 1989-1990 Fund"; 25 and who shall place into said Fund all payments of assessments 26 received from the County Tax Collector and payments shall be made 27 out to said special Fund only for the purposes provided for in 28 said Chapter 3.5, Article 2, 3 and 4, Sections 55530 through 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 55570, of the Government Code of the State of California. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk of said City is hereby ordered to transmit, or cause to be transmitted, to the County Auditor of Los Angeles County, State of California, as contemplated under the provisions of the "Crossing Guard Maintenance District Act of 1974"•, the Diagram and Assessment upon which such levy is based, and the County Tax Collector of said County (who is also the City Tax Collector for said City) is ordered and directed to make collection of all assessments shown required by law of and to be performed by the officer, employee, or person so designated. SECTION 5. That prior to the expiration of fifteen days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the EASY READER, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 6. That this ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney ty/cgord May 23, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 13, 1989 PUBLIC HEARING '•CONFIRMATION OF FY 89-90 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT ASSESSMENT Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 89- , a resolution of the Hermosa Beach confirming the FY 89-90 street lighting assessment and levying assessment for the fiscal year July 1, 1989. 2. Revise the FY 89-90 estimated revenue for secured in the Lighting District to $329,027. Background: On April 25, 1989 which set 8:00 pm public hearing in Analysis: City of district commencing collections City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-5258, on June 13, 1989 as the time and date for a order to accept public input on this matter. A notice for this public hearing was printed in the May 4, 1989 edition of the Easy Reader. Adoption of the attached resolution provides for the funds necessary to continue the operation of the City's street lighting system. The assessment provides for the payment of all costs related to street lighting operation, maintenance and administration. The FY 89-90 assessment. is as follows: FY 88-89 FY 89-90 Amount of Assessment Percent Decrease $365,878.80 $329,026.80 10% The assessment for FY 89-90 is $36,852 less than FY 88-89. At the February 9, 1988 City Council meeting, the City's Assessment Engineer's proposal included a five year program to reduce the total street lighting assessment 10% each year for a period of five years resulting in an assessment reduction to the taxpayers of $522,671. The goal has been accomplished. Mr. Patrick Rossetti, the City's Assessment Engineer, will be present at the June 13, 1989 meeting to answer questions about the assessment. 1 Alternatives: Another alternative available to City Council is: 1) Let the district lapse; thereby, causing an increased general fund obligation of $329,026.80 Respectfully submitted Anthony Antich Director of P3biic Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator Concur: evin B. Northcraft City Manager Attachments: Estimate of Costs FY 89-90 Resolution No. 89 - Note: The Finance Administrator notes that the revenue amount shown in the preliminary budget is different than the assessment shown in this item. It is recommended that City Council revise the FY 89-90 estimated revenue for secured collections in the Lighting District to $329,027. HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1989-1990 FY 88-89 Actual July 1, 1988 Fund Balance $ 1,235,168 Estimated FY 88-89 Revenue $ 466,882 * Estimated FY 88-89 Expenditure $ 445,799 * Estimated June 30, 1989 Fund Balance * Based on mid -year 2/28/89 report ** Mid -year FY 89-90 Estimated July 1, 1989 Fund Balance NET ASSESSMENT FOR FY 89-90 Estimated FY 89-90 Expenditure $ 1,256,251 ** $ 1,256,251 $ 329,027 380,299 Estimated June 30, 1990 Fund Balance $ 1,204,979 hbcgs 4/13/88 HERMOSA•BEACH STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1989-1990 ESTIMATE OF COST FY 1989-1990 1. Direct Expenses: Total Regular Salaries/Miscellaneous $ 76,663 Regular Overtime 1,000. Vacation/Sick Pay Off 1,533 Accrual Cash In 1,533 Part Time/Temporary 4,000 Retirement 11,394 Employee Benefits 8,751 Contract Services/Private: - Assessment Engineering Services 14,300 Contract Services/Government: - L.A. Co. Collections of Assessments 2,000 - PCH Lighting Agreement w/Caltrans 6,500 Materials/Supplies/Other (incl. energy costs) 192,850 Subtotal: $320,524 2. Incidental Expenses: City Manager Administration $ 500 City Council Administration 500 Engineering Department 2,500 Legal Expense 500 City Clerk Expense 500 3. Operating Expenses of Equipment and Data Support Services: Subtotal: $ 4,500 Subtotal: $ 1,000 4. Capital Improvements: CIP 85-102 Highland Lights CIP 85-201 Light Conv./Install. St. Lite Upgrade CIP 85-202 Hermosa Ave. Lighting $ /,775 39,000 16,500 Subtotal: $ 54,275 Total Costs for Street Lighting District No. 89-90: $ 380,299 hbcgs 4/13/89 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND LEVYING ASSESSMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1989. HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1989-1990 WHEREAS, in the proceedings under the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" ,(commencing with Section 22500, Streets and Highways Code), the City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-5240 ordering the Director of Public Works to prepare and file the report required by said Act for the proposed levy of an annual assessment for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1989, and pursuant thereto such report has been prepared and filed with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted its Resolution No. 89-5257 approving the report as filed pursuant to Resolution No. 89-5240 ordering said report; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted its Resolution of Intention No. 89-5258 declaring its intention to order certain street lighting fixtures and appurtenances to be installed, maintained and electric current to be furnished for lighting of said fixtures for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1989 and appointing a time and place for hearing protests relative thereto;'and WHEREAS, the hearing was duly held at the time and place fixed therefor and all interested pesons desiring to hear and be heard, either orally or in writing, were afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard on the report of the Director of Public Works, the Diagram and Assessment contained therein, or in any way relating to the report and the proceedings. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has considered all oral and 3 written protests made or filed by any interested persons, and 4 except to the extent of any changes ordered by the City Council, 5 .each and all protests are overruled and denied. 6 SECTION 2. The Assessment and Diagram are hereby confirmed.. 7 The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of an • 8 assessment for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1989, as 9 referred to in the assessment. 10 SECTION 3. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified 11 copy of this Resolution and of the Diagram and Assessment referred to herein with the County Auditor of the County of Los 12 13 Angeles. ,Thereupon, the County Auditor shall provide for the 14 collection of assessments at the time and in the manner provided 15 in the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972". 16 SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and 17 adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the same to be entered in the book of original Resolutions of said CIty; and shall make 18 19 a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of 20 the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes 21 of the meeting at which time the same is passed and adopted. 22 SECTION 5. That this Resolution shall take effect 23 immediately. 24 25 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 13th day of June 1989. 26 II PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California 27 ATTEST: � , CITY CLERK 28 II APPROVED AS TO FORM: � LOAIL `%GQP , CITY ATTORNEY Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 6, 1989 Regular Meeting of June 13, 1989 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 89-3 -- APPEAL FEES, CITY COUNCIL APPEAL OF COMMISSION DECISIONS PURPOSE: TO WAIVE ANY REQUIRED APPEAL FEES WHEN COUNCILMEMBERS BRING UP A COMMISSION•DECISION FOR RECONSIDERATION• 0 INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL 0• Recommendation Adopt the attached Ordinance relocating the appeal provision for land use matters within the municipal code, and waiving appeal fees when at least two councilmembers bring up a Commission decision for reconsiderationin those instances where the Municipal Code provides for an appeal. Analysis The City Council adopted Section 1609, contained in the Zoning Ordinance, on June 25, 1985 to require fees and public noticing from appellants who appeal Planning Commission decisions on land use matters to the City Council. The ordinance amendment was included in Section 1609 to make it a part of Article 16 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding Planning Commission "Procedure, Hearings, Notices, and Fees". Staff believes it would be more appropriate to include this section in Chapter 2, Article 1, of the Municipal Code regarding "Administration, In General," and more specifically in an added Section 2-2.27 which is after Section 2-2.26 where exceptions to application and appeal fees are noted. Although Section 1609 of the Zoning Ordinance currently allows for appeals of Planning Commission decisions there are no provisions allowing the City Council or any member thereof to appeal a Planning Commission decision without paying the $348.50 fee. In staff's judgement it certainly would be appropriate to allow the City Council the option to bring Planning Commission decisions up for reconsideration without the payment of fees. Often there are serious implications to the Commission decisions, which should, if under question, be reconsidered at the City Council level. Also, in order to limit the frequency of councilmembers bringing commission items forward for reconsideration, and to minimize any possibility of abuse of the procedure, staff believes that at least two councilmembers should sponsor bringing up a decision to Council for reconsideration. This section of the Municipal Code should also allow councilmembers to reconsider decisions of any of the City's - 1 - Commissions, in those instances where the Code provides for appeals, when at least two councilmembers determine that such an appeal is warranted. Any fees required of such an appeal would be waived. • In regards to the 300 -foot radius public noticing required for certain land use matters involving the Planning Commission, e.g.. Conditional. Use Permits and Variances, the City would bear the, cost for such noticing if it sponsors the appeal. CONCUR: Devin B. Northcraft City Manager t/ccsrapp Attachments 1. Proposed Ordinance No. 89- 2. Ordinance No. 85-809 Respectfully 'Gbig1tted Michael Schubach Planning Director CITY MANAGER COMMENT: The City Council delegates authority to commissions, but should have authority to call up decisions for Council review without paying a fee to carry out responsibilitis of their office. The recommendation supports the representative democracy position that elected officials should set policy. 1• 2 3 4 5 6 7 •8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 89 - AN. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 2-2.27 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE, :.'APPEAL FEES, CITY COUNCIL.' APPEAL OF COMMISSION DECISIONS NOT SUBJECT TO FEES," TO RELOCATE THE APPEAL FEE' PROVISION FOR LAND USE MATTERS IN 'THE'MUNICIPAL: CODE, AND WAIVING APPEAL FEES WHEN AT LEAST TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS SPONSOR RECONSIDERATION OF A COMMISSION DECISION. WHEREAS, the City Council hpl.d a public hearing on..June 1.3, 1989 and made the following Findings: A. Procedures for the appeal of Planning Commission decisions to City Council are more appropriately located in Chapter 2,. Article 1 of the Municipal Code: "Administration, In General," than in Article 16, "Procedure, Hearing, Notices and Fees" of the Zoning Ordinance; B. It is appropriate for the City Council to have an option to bring up for reconsideration certain decisions made by the Planning Commission on land use matters, where the Code provides for an appeal, if at least two councilmembers sponsor such a reconsideration, without paying the fee required of other appellants; C. It is appropriate for the City Council to bring up for reconsideration any decisions rendered by any of the City's Commissions, where the Code provides for an appeal, if at least two councilmembers agree that the circumstances or conditions warrant such a reconsideration; D. Allowing the City Council to reconsider decisions of its various commissions is in the public interest; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain as follows: 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 1. That a Section 2-2.27 be added to read as follows: Sec; 2-2.27 Appeal fees, City Council appeals of Commissions decisions not subject to fees. • Where the zoning ordinance or municipal code allowp for sill: appeal to be filed•with the City Council on matters regarding land use, a fee, established pursuant to Chapter 2, Article XIII' of the. Municipal Code shall accompany such an appeal. In addition to such an appeal fee, the appellant shall be 'responsible for providing any required public noticing and shall pay the direct cost of required newspaper ads. As used in this section "land use matters" shallinclude zone variances, condi€Yonal use permits, tentative parcel and tract maps; precise plans and any other discretionary process by which land use is regulated. In those instances where the City Council, or at least two members thereof, determines that it is in the public interest to reconsider a decision of any commission of the City, and. only where the Municipal Code provides for an appeal, the City Council shall reconsider said decision and shall waive any fees normally required of the appellant. When the City Council, or at least two members thereof, sponsors bringing up such a reconsideration of a commission decision the City shall be responsible for providing any required public noticing and shall pay the direct cost of required newspaper ads. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 1609 of the Municipal Code is hereby repealed. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1989". day of PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the .City Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST:•• CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TOF RM: Vc22 CITY ATTORNEY t/ccrsapp 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO (7-809 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ADDING A SECTION 1b09 -TO ARTICLE 16 "PROCEDURE, HEAR- INGS, NOTICES AND FEES" OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW A FEE TO BE CHARGED FOR A°PEALS TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON MATTERS RELATING TO LAND USE. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission.hel'd a .public hearing.: on May 21, 1985 to consider this matter; and WHEREAS, the. City Council, held a public hearing on June 25, 1985 'to consider this 'matter; and WHEREAS, it has been has determined that an appeal to the City Council on matters relating to -land use is a service that the City provides which should be paid by the user (appel lant) ; and WHEREAS, by charging a fee for an appeal, the general public would be relieved of the tax burden of subsidizing this service; and WHEREAS, charging an appeal fee would minimize capri- cious appeals. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That a section 1609 be added to Article 16 "Pro- cedure, Hearings, Notices and Fees" to read as follows: "Section 1609 Appeal Fees Where the zoning ordinance or municipal code allows for an appeal to be filed with the City Council on matters regarding land use, a fee, established pursuant to Chapter 2, Article XIII of the Municipal Code shall accompany such appeal. In addition to such appeal fee, the appellant shall be responsible for pro- viding any required public noticing and shall pay the direct cost of required newspaper ads. As used in this section "land use matters" shall include zone variances, conditional use permits, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 tentative parcel and tract maps, precte plans and any other dis- cretionary crocess by which land use is regulated." SECTION 2. That this Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of.its adoption. SECTION 3. That prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly news- paper of general circulation', published and circulated in the • City of Hermosa ATTEST: D ADOPTED this 9th day of July, 1985 P•R€SZDENT o the City Council and MAYOR of th-, City of Hermosa Beach, California APP:•VED AS TO FORM: 111 CITY CLERK Y ATTORNEY