Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07/12/88
"If it takes a lot of words to say what you have in mind, give it more thought." -Dennis Roth AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 12, 1988 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 6:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR Jim Rosenberger MAYOR PRO TEM June Williams COUNCILMEMBERS Roger Creighton Chuck Sheldon Etta Simpson CITY CLERK Kathleen Midstokke CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY James P. Lough All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PROCLAMATIONS: Lore , - , 988 PRESENTATIONS TO OUTGOING MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar or within the jurisdiction of the Council not elsewhere considered on the agenda may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the item is called. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are request- ed to submit those comments to the City Manager. APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEM: A. Designate Mayor for 8 month term ending March 14, 1989. B. Designate Mayor Pro Tem for 8 month term ending March 14, 1989. C. Intergovernmental agencies requiring appointment of Mayor as delegate. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated July 5, 1988. 1 1. (a) CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) Recommendation to approve minutes as follows: 1) Minutes of Special Meeting for joint meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council with Board of Trustees Hermosa Beach City School District held on June 20, 1988; 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on June 28, 1988. (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive and cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Recommendation to approve investment policy of Hermosa Beach idle funds. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated June 29, 1988. (c) (e) (f) (g) Recommendation to receive and file monthly investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated July 6, 1988. Recommendation to approve and authorize Mayor to sign contract between City of Hermosa Beach and Mark Briggs & Associates, Inc. for State Grant reconciliation. Memo- randum from Assistant City Manager Alana Mastrian dated July 6, 1988. Recommendation to approve and authorize Mayor to sign contract between the City of Hermosa Beach and Bob Pritchard International Marketing for Pro Volleyball contract. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated July 6, 1988. Recommendation to approve amended agreement for legal services with the firm of Kane, Ballmer & Berkman. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated July 7, 1988. ***************************************************************** MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING: After the City Clerk has read the title to any resolution or or- dinance on tonight's agenda, the further reading thereof be waived, reserving and guaranteeing to each Councilmember the right to demand the reading of any such resolution or ordinance in regular order. ***************************************************************** - 2 - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ORDINANCE NO. 88-936 - AMENDING SECTION 1-7.3 "NOTICE TO APPEAR -TIME" OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE. For adoption. ORDINANCE NO. 88-937 - AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANG- ING THE ZONE FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED AND SHOWN ON ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Area 7 from R-2 to R -2B). For adoption. (c) ORDINANCE NO. 88-938 - ADOPTING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD "ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, GRADES K-8, C.U.P. REQUIRED" TO THE R-1 ZONE, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEN- TIAL ZONE, AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DEC- LARATION. For adoption. (d) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 8-6, CIVIL DE- FENSE AND DISASTER - EMERGENCY POWER. For introduction. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated July 5, 1988. (e) A RESOLUTION RECITING THE FACT OF THE CANVASS OF THE BALLOTS FROM THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION CONSOLIDATED WITH THE PRIMARY ELECTION HELD ON JUNE 7, 1988, DECLAR- ING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY PROVISION OF LAW. For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated July 5, 1988. (f) A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING WAGES, HOURS, TERMS AND CONDI- TIONS OF EMPLOYMENT GOVERNING EMPLOYEES REPRESENTED BY . THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION, POLICE COMMANDERS BARGAINING UNIT. For adoption. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated July 11, 1988. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) Letter from South Bay Center for Counseling dated July 5, 1988, requesting free space at Community Center. Recommended Action: To refer to the Community Resources Commission for consideration. (b) Letter from National Council for Alcoholism dated requesting free space at Community Center. Recommended Action: To refer to the Community Resources Commission for consideration. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING OF TEXT AMENDMENT TO AMEND OR REPEAL BILTMORE SITE SPA ORDINANCE NO. 84-751. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated July 7, 1988. 6. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION UNMERGING OF LOTS GROUP L.M. 88-4 (WITH RESOLUTIONO. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated July 5, 1988. 7. EXTENSION OF INTERIM FIRE FLOW ORDINANCE AND CONTINUANCE OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO DATE CERTAIN. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated July 6, 1988. HEARINGS 8. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF PRIORITIZED CITY GOALS. Memoran- dum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated July 7, 1988. C 3 _ -C }-- 6V-- -C) MUNICIPAL MATTERS 9. STATISTICAL DATA ON R-2 ZONED LOTS WITH A POTENTIAL OF MORE THAN 2 UNITS, EXCLUDING REZONED AREAS 2, 9, AND 7. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated July 5, 1988. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Proposed ballot measures regarding Biltmore Site and Railroad Right -of -Way. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated July 7, 1988. (b) Status report re. railroad right-of-way. (Reserved on agenda in case there is new information to report.) 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Vacancies - Boards and Commissions Civil Service Commission - 2 four-year terms expiring 7/15/92. Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (b) Request from Councilmembers Williams and Sheldon for discussion of possible building moratorium on the west side of the 2400 block of Myrtle Avenue and/or any R-2 zoned area which abuts R-1 zoned areas. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. ADJOURNMENT SCRIPT FOR ROTATION OF MAYOR 1. OUTGOING MAYOR SIMPSON'S COMMENTS 2. MOTIONS TO APPOINT JIM ROSENBERGER AS MAYOR AND JUNE WILLIAMS AS MAYOR PRO TEM FOR TERMS ENDING 3-14-89 3. SWAP SEATS AND NAMEPLATES 4. MOTIONS TO...(SEE 4 ACTIONS RECOMMENDED IN CITY CLERK'S MEMO) 5. PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE TO OUTGOING MAYOR SIMPSON BY NEW MAYOR JIM ROSENBERGER 6. INCOMING MAYOR ROSENBERGER'S COMMENTS 7. REFER TO AGENDA - CONSENT CALENDAR CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. CITY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs -are borne by visitor/users; led/by a City Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers THE'HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach bas the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager, operating tbrougb the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY • The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. • Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City.Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal • requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by tbe Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting. Miscellaneous Items. and Reports - City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since tbe agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of the City Council may place items on .the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member•after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority Is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business district. July 5, 1988 City Council Meeting July 12, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ,APPATNTMENT. QF ..MM QR,. 4PP . NATON . PRO.. TZM CIT. COU ign_BEOBGANIZaLtQN - _,JULY. 1988 Consistent with the City Council policy of a nine-month rotation of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore, the following appointments should be made: 1. Mayor for a term ending March 14, 1989. 2. Mayor Pro Tempore for a term ending March 14, 1989. Recommendations after appointment of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore are: 1. To appoint Councilmember Simpson delegate and Mayor Rosenberger alternate to the city selection committee of SCRTD, and to adopt Resolution No. 88- entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING A MEMBER OF SAID COUNCIL OF SAID CITY TO THE CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO PART 3 OF DIVISION 10 OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE." 2. To appoint the Mayor to the Los Angeles County/City Selection Committee. 3. To appoint the Mayor to the South Bay Cities Sanitation District Board of Directors, and Councilmember Simpson alternate director. 4. To appoint Councilmember Simpson as delegate and Mayor Rosenberger as alternate to the Inglewood Fire Training Authority. (They meet immediately following the Sanitation District meeting.) Enclosed for your information are current committee assignments as of July 5, 1988. The remainder of the assignments may be made at the City Council meeting of July 26, 1988. Following appointment/reappointment, letters will be sent to the appropriate boards and commissions. You will receive a list of the newly appointed members. POCS RQU D At the City Council Meeting of March 8, 1988, a report was re- quested regarding the rotation of some committee assignments where a permanent representative would best serve the committee. 1 contacted the following entities to which we normally appoint the Mayor as delegate: C t e e.tion . mmit ee Of h- So.-lif..;a• • sit Tt Authority in Public Utilities Code Section 3.207. Does not appear to require appointment of Mayor as delegate. Requires new resolution for appointments. $outh,_$ay _C jt gs, . County _Sinitgtipn D,i. trrict BQp e s Author y n Health & Safety bode Section 41730. a .t press ing officer is automatically on the Board of Directors, however, an alternate director is appointed to act in place ... during such person's absence, inability, or refusal to act. Therefore, the alternate could attend the meetings in the Mayor's place without requiring Council action each time. ko .AngflesCQgnty-City_$gl,tQtj9n Somgiitte2 Authority in Government Code Sect on 50270. The committee "shall consist of the mayor of each city within the county." Other councilmembers can be designated delegates at each meet- ing. This would require Council action each time a meeting is called, therefore, it is recommended that this appointment con- tinue to be the new Mayor. CONCUR: ;46kAL.,) KATTTHLEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk+ EVIN :. NOR RAFT, CITY MANAGER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING A MEMBER OF SAID COUNCIL OF SAID CITY TO THE CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO PART 3 OF DIVISION 10 OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to the Southern California Rapid Transit District Law, being Part 3 of Division 10 of the Public Utilities Code of the State of California, the City Council does hereby appoint the following member of said Council as a member to the City Selection Committee: Delegate: Councilmember Etta Simpson Alternate: Mayor Jim Rosenberger SECTION 2. That the within resolution operative and the appointment made by effective as of July 12, 1988. SECTION 3. That immediately the appointment hereby made, the City shall become Section 1 hereof shall be after the effective date of Clerk shall without delay forward a copy of this resolution, together with appointment made hereby, to the Secretary of the ornia Rapid Transit District. SECTION 4. That the City adoption of this resolution; shall notice of the Southern Calif - Clerk shall certify to the cause the action of the City Council in adopting same to be entered in the official minutes of said City Council; and shall retain this resolution, duly signed by the proper City officials in the official records of the City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY 1988 ATTEST: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK Date: July 5, 1988 CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION OF DELEGATES, ALTERNATE APPOINTMENTS AND/OR REAPPOINTMENT Appointments made: Beach Cities Committee Delegate Simpson Delegate Rosenberger Commuter Transportation Implementation Plan Steering Committee Delegate Creighton (5-24-88) Alternate Rosenberger (5-24-88) Independent Cities Association Delegate Simpson Alternate Rosenberger Independent Cities Risk Management Association Delegate Sheldon Resolution No. 87-5095 Alternate Blackwood Inglewood Fire Training Authority Commission (same as South Bay Sanitation District) Delegate Simpson (3-8-88) Alternate Rosenberger (3-8-88) League of California Cities - Board of Directors Delegate Rosenberger Alternate Creighton Los Angeles County/City Selection Committee (must appoint alter- nate separately each time if unable to attend when meeting is called.) Mayor Simpson Sister City Association, Inc. Delegate Williams Alternate Sheldon South Bay Cities Association Delegate Delegate Simpson Williams South Bay Cities Sanitation District (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County) (Same as Inglewood Fire Training Auth.) Delegate Simpson Alternate Rosenberger South Bay Corridor Study Steering Committee Delegate Williams Alternate Creighton South Bay Juvenile Diversion Project Delegate Sheldon Alternate Rosenberger South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority Delegate Rosenberger Primary Alternate Sheldon (other three councilmembers are back-up alternates Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) Delegate Simpson Alternate Sheldon Southern California Rapid Transit District (by Resolution) Delegate Simpson Resolution No. 87-5085 Alternate Rosenberger Nest Basin Water Association Delegate Simpson SDBCONNITTSSS Business Relations Councilmember Rosenberger Councilmember Williams City -School District Relations Councilmember Creighton Councilmember Simpson Coordinating Council Councilmember Williams Councilmember Sheldon Fire and Police Relations Councilmember Williams Councilmember Creighton Planning Councilmember Sheldon Councilmember Rosenberger Railroad Right -of -Way Councilmember Councilmember Rosenberger Simpson Litigation (Temporary) Councilmember Creighton Councilmember Sheldon Fire Flow Fee (Temporary) Councilmember Rosenberger (6-28-88) Councilmember Williams (6-28-88) 3 BACKGROUND MATERIALS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY 1955 Workman Mill Road / Whittier, California Mailing Address: / P. 0. Box 4998, Whittier, California 90607 Telephone: (213) 699-7411 / From Los Angeles (213) 685-5217 April 28, 1988 Ms. Kathleen Midstokke City Clerk Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear Ms. Midstokke: CHARLES W. CARRY Chief Engineer and General Manager Requirement that Mayor be Delegate In reply to your letter of April 6, 1988, and to confirm information given by telephone, the Sanitation Districts are special districts established by the Sanitation District Act of 1923 (Division V, Part 3, Chapter 3, Sections 4700 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California). Section 4730 provides: "The presiding officer of the governing body of each city, the whole or part of which is included in the sanitation district, is a member of the board. ... The gov- erning body of each city ... shall each select one of its members, other than its presiding officer, as an alternate director to act as a member of the district board in place of the presiding officer ... during such person's absence, inability, or refusal to act." The alternate Director remains such until that individual becomes Mayor, leaves the Council (or resigns as alternate Direc- tor), or until someone else is appointed. LD:sg Please advise if any further information is required. Yours very truly, y Dir Chief Accountant and Secretary to the Boards MEMBER CITIES AHS Alhambra Arcadia Arta & Avalon Aura Baldwin Park Bellflower Ball Ball Gardens Beverly Hine Bradbury Burbank Carson Cerritos Claremont Commerce Compton Covina Cudahy Culver City Downey Doane El Monte El Segundo Gardena Glendale Glendora Hawaiian Garde Hawthorne Hermosa Bach Hidden Hila Huntington Park Industry Inglewood Irwindale La CanadalFlintrtdge La Hebra Heights Lakewood La Mirada Lancaster La Puente La Verne Lawndale Lomita Long Beach Us Angeles Manhattan Beach Maywood Monrovia Montebello Monterey Park Norwalk Pahmlele Palos Verdes Estates Paramount Pasadena Pico Rivera Pomona Rambo Pelee Venda Redondo Beach Rolling Hills Rolling Hills Estates Rosemead San Dims San Fernando San Gabriel San Marino Santa Clarke Santa Fe Springs Santa Monica Sierra Madre Signal Hill South El Monte South Gate South Pasadena Temple Qty Torrance Vernon Walnut Wert Covina West Hollywood Westlake Village Whittler LOS ANGELES COUNTY CITY SELECTION COMMI April 13, 1988 Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear Ms. Midstokke: Subject: City Selection Committee Delegates This is in response to your letter of April 6th inquiring about the requirement that mayors be appointed as delegates to the Los Angeles County -City Selection Committee. Government Code, Section 50270 provides that the membership of the Committee "shall consist of the mayor of each city within the county." Further, Section 50271 reads "when the mayor is unable to attend a meeting of a city selection committee, he shall designate another member of the city's legislative body to attend and vote at the meeting in his place and as his representative." While the law requires that the mayor is the member of the com- mittee, it does not prohibit the designation of other council members as delegates at each meeting. The delegate can be the same council member, if the City deems necessary to facilitate its business. Confirmation of delegates is necessary, however, when the mayor is unable to attend the meeting. We appreciate your writing to us. If we can be of further assistance, please let us know. Very truly yours, LARRY J. MONTEILH Secretary 383 HALL OF ADMINISTRATION, 500 WEST TEMPLE STREET, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 Edmund Krause Vice Chairman Larry J. Monte 3ecetery Violet Verona Deputy Secretary § 30201 PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE combining the areas of the cities within the district, except the City of Los Angeles, into four corridors based on existing or proposed transit lines. The rules and regulations shall provide that the member of the board to be selected by a subcommittee of the city selection committee shall be s resident of the corridor represented by the subcommittee. The terms of office of these four members of the board shall be for four years. On and after January 1, 1977, any appointment to the board shall be made by a subcommittee of the committee, which subcommittee shall include only members representing those cities within the corridor that the previous director represented. The appointment of a subcommittee shall be deemed approved by the city selection committee unless rejected by a two-thirds vote of the committee within 80 days of the appointment. If the appointment is so rejected, the subcommittee shall make another appointment. (Amended by Stats.1976, c. 469, p. 1218, § 1; Stata1977, c. 208, p. 726, f 1.) Lew Review Comemeriee Public officials sepreseet acres, not people. (1974) 7 Loyola L.Rer. (Clelif.) 227. C.o ret i"'4117cc § 30207. Clay selection committee; establishment; membership; number of votes A city selection committee shall be established which shall consist of one member representing each city within the district as described in Section 80100, except the City of Los Angeles. Each member of the city selection committee shall serve without compensation from the district and shall be designated and appointed by and be a member of the governing body of the city he represents. As a member of the city selection committee, each member shall be entitled to vote on all motions coming before the committee or subcommittee thereof of which such member is a member, and shall be entitled to cast one vote for each ' ' ' 10 000 or major fractional part thereof, of • ' ' ' population in the city represented by him as shown the • • • latest population estimate prepared by the popula ''pre research unit of the Department of Finance pursuant to Section 2227 of the Revenue and 'luxation Code; provided, that each member shall have at least one vote and no cit1 shall have votes exceeding in number the total number of votes of all the other cities • ' represented on the committee. For the purposes of this section, the term "major fractional part" means a fractional part larger than one-half. (Amended by Stats.1976, c. 469, p. 1214, § 2.) § 30221. Ming vacancies of board members appointed by subcommittee of city selection committee Whenever a vacancy occurs in the • • • member of the board ' • • appointed a subcommittee of the city selection committee, the • • • vacancy shall be filled by ' ' • that so mmittee. The r' • subcommittee shall meet within 80 ' ' ' days following the occurrence to t a (Erector to fill thevacancy.—Tie board ' ' • shall determine promptly the time and place of the meeting of the • • • subcommittee and shall give the members at least 10 • • • days notice thereof. Whenever there s�not�a quorum present at the meeting of the • • 0 subcommittee, the meeting shall be adjourned to a subsequent time and place as determined by a majority of the total number of votes present. The appointment of the subcommittee shall be deemed approved by the city selection committee unless rejected by a two-thirds vote of the committee within 30 days of the appointment. If the appointment is so rejected, the subcommittee shall make another appointment. An appointment to fill a vacancy shall be for the unexpired portion of the term. (Amended by Stats.1976, c. 469, p. 1214, § 8.) § 30222. Annual meeting of city selection committee The city selection committee shall meet' • • within 4b' • • days after • • • receiving the latest population estimate by the population research unit of the Department of Financepmsuant to Section 2227 of the Itevenue and Taxation Code j1) to determine the number of votes each member is entitled to cast and (2) to enable each subcommittee of the committee to a y . • t a member to the board on the basis of the newly determined number of votes each mem . is entitled to east provided, however, that nothing herein shall prevent the reappointment of directors who are currently serving or who have served previously. The board • • • shall determine the time and place of the meeting of the city selection committee and shall give the members at least l0 • • • Underline indicates chargee or additions by amendment 28 161114.1 days ac select of a major (A § auth holdinj additidn by meml)er § 30253 L 4 e tdraf Theb pa optima. I (Amend( Section 30276`. 1.40213 AO be at any t the awl co ort2wes by t e uot (Akedf 3. 6 § The aeP 42. ay, of ae_ P Zp1b2iTs.� a at 12. LLEO E__QE_ALLEGIANCE - Councilmember Rosenberger JOLL-CAUL.-_XJL CQUNCJL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson Absent: None PLI.-CALL .-.. N4ARR_9 'IRUTEE§ Present: Marks, Meyer, Tattu, Weiss, President Gonzales Absent: None The meeting was adjourned to a committee of the whole. City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft gave a brief overview of the items to be discussed. im or �$ on Mon ay, June Beac ommunity Center, Room iUB$9A9iOMh@BBs13841KE4irRV'BD_9I1_1?BI4GIHG The Board of Trustees explained that they have unanswered legal questions regarding land use such as drilling on their site, other uses that are prohibited, Prop 65, and the tank farm. It was explained that there would be no obligation on behalf of the School District in regards to incurring costs, as the EIR is being paid by McPherson Oil Company. At this time, both bodies adjourned the joint meeting, and called to order seperate meetings in order to take the following actions: 19tJ04;To have a joint EIR with the Hermosa Beach School Distr et in regards to oil drilling per the November, 1984 Election. Motion Sheldon, second Williams. So ordered. j 4114@I To have a joint EIR with the City of Hermosa Beach in regards to Oil drilling per the November, 1984 Election. Motion Gonzales, second Weiss. So ordered. It was stated that this would require joint public hearings. The City/School District subcommittee will continue to monitor the progress of this project. The meeting was reconvened jointly to a committee of the whole. 13C) Minutes 6-20-88 QI QlSSIQI4. QF .S4WOQI._ DISTRICT_ SURPLUSa P o£RTIE AMD . QLTl_OP1'N SPACE INTERESTS* There was discussion regarding the City's oil revenue and acquisition of open space. The School Board explained that there is some current legislation regarding expenditure of funds received from surplus property. It was stated that their immediate needs are for revenue for educational programs. The subcommittee will continue to discuss this matter. The School Board suggested that it would be beneficial to get together again after their new administration is secured and long term programs have been established. QTRER , PQ$SI IE,. ABEj S .QF... EQ$$IDLE SQaPRRATIQE_ EFFQRTS Building maintenance, grounds maintenance, uses of Community Center, upkeep of closed facilities. The School District explained that they employ a gardener, and the upkeep on their leased sites was the responsibility of the lessee. Staff was requested to get a copy of the agreement between the city of Manhattan Beach and their School District. It was agreed that there will another joint meeting mid-October. 4D 1OURNMENT The Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held jointly with the Board of Trustees of Hermosa Beach City School District was adjourned at 8:40 P.M. ., 1-1);1 Kat leen Midstokke, City Clerk 2 Minutes 6-20-88 MINU.. •F T G ME G • 0 C of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hel• on Tuesday, June 28, 1988 at the hour of 7:47 P.M. RQI.4. _ CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson Absent: None PLA NNINC_CQUMINION..INTERYIEWS - 5:30 p.m. Interviewed were: Rhett Beavers, John Edwards, Christine Ketz, and Howard Simon 5ID ESSIQN - 6:00 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section ,OS495 aj) to discuss Ganan}ge, v:.-Glty, of Hermon, Beach, Escalante._v.. City_Qf, Hermosa, Beonh, Suautav personnel matters and real property negotiations on the Railroad Right -of -Way and the Biltmore site. pLEQGE_OF_ALuGIANCE - Michael Flaharty, Chief Union Steward, Teamsters #911 ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson Absent: None TNmuCTIQN_Qu NKK_] MP Oj(gg: Devin Guzman, Police Officer by Lt. Tony Altfeld 4N 0UNGENENTS_ FON CLOSED SESSI011 City Attorney Lough announced the dismissal by the plaintiff against all parties in the case of Gas] ,ampg..,v.,,City,f-Eierg4:0sa kap!) with prejudice. 0T1jEN_..CONN NTS Elizabeth Myers, owns 3323 Hermosa Avenue re her request for a variance - referred to staff for clarification of variance. Howard Longacre, 1221 - 7th Place re the use of asbestos pipe is the City and water quality standards - asked for testing. 1. CON$ENT.CALENDAR t n: To approve Consent Calendar recommendations (a) rough (s) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for further discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (b) Creighton, (g) Sheldon, (k) Williams and (p) Williams. Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon. So ordered. 1 - Minutes 6-28-88 ia(2 I (a) 8ecommendation._to,.ap_grove ininutes of regular meeting of the City Council held On June 1 , 1988. (b) Recome d.t on t• asir.e Demands -nd W-rr.-nts Nos. •597 and 2.7 3 through 2.:70 inclusive noting voided Warrants Nos. 26749, 26751, 26752 and 26753. rgp9sed..Act4on; To pull item r (Tassie's Flowers - $34.61) on page 24 and send back to staff for -appropri- ate action. Motion Creighton - dies for lack of a second. Action: To approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 25497 and 267)43 through 26870 inclusive noting voided Warrants Nos. 26749, 26751, 26752 and 26753. Motion Mayor Simpson, second Sheldon. So ordered noting NO votes by Creighton and Rosenberger. (c) Recommendation.to,receive,-and&file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to„receiye_and file, the monthly. financial reports„ f or,_ flay, -198 s 1) Expenditure Report 2) Revenue Report 3) Treasurer's Report (e) Recommendation to authOrizeCity,Manager to sign erten- ion of eontr� act rith,Self Insurers„Service, Inc. for third party administration of the City's Workers' Cpm` Pensation claims. Memorandum from Risk Manager Robert Blackwood date. June 21, 1988. (f) Recommendation to.take,-a legislative,adyocaey position urging, enactment of. ABw3Q63 ,which requires.., the . QePart- ent of Motor Vehicles to.establish .a 'clot •ro:ram to o. ect •arkin: •enaitiesre:ardless of whether a vehi- g_e,is_.trans erre' Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated June 9, 1988. (g) Recommendation to,-,approye.,_outstanding. employee -program. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat- ed June 20, 1988. Motion Sheldon, second Mayor Simpson. So ordered. (h) Recommendation to receive and file .r -. ort .on needs as- essme t.study forCity„Hall, space requirements, CIP, 8- O91. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 7, 1988. (i) Recommendation_to deny, claims and refer to City's Claims Administrator thel.claims_ of: 1) Brian Sullivan, 182 Manhattan Avenue, represented by Charles Eric McCurdy, Atty, 10960 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1808, LA 90024, filed June 13, 1988 - alleged injury to ankle and foot due to irregular 2 Minutes 6-28-88 sidewalk; 2) Jeff Jordan, 2450 Via Campesina, Palos Verdes Es- tates, CA 90274, filed June 14, 1988 - alleged bicycle injury due to firehose on Strand; 3) Torrance Nissan, 20710 Hawthorne Blvd., Torrance, CA 90503, filed June 16, 1988 - alleged vehicle damage by city equipment. 4) Hap Jacobs, 2224 Thorley Place, Palos Verdes Es- tates 90274, filed June 20, 1988 - alleged damage by truck to house and basketball hoop at 650 Beach Drive. (j) Recommendation toa rove re•uestfor 0da .exte "*n Of.temporary appointment - Police Records,Admi.nistrator. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert A. Blackwood dated June 20, 1988. 9 31 (k) Recommendation to authorize_ disposal ,of firearms i,n. ac- 0Ordance with Section_120?8.0, of, the California, Penal Code. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wis- niewski dated June 20, 1988. Action.: To authorize the destruction of firearms rather than trading them. Motion Williams, second Sheldon. So ordered. (1) Recommendation tQ_grant,a.Negative Declaration, foror- dinajce establishing_.f rg flow fees, Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach date June 21, 1988. Recommendation to_,approve_request to reconsider caretak- e._uni r.t., in _the_.Manufeeturing_zone. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated June 23, 1988. Recommendation,to,.approye.,Project Touch lease agreement at Community..Center. Memorandum from Community Resour- ces Director Alana Mastrian dated June 20, 1988. Recommendation to _receive, and .. file_Child., Abuse_ Monthly Report. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated June 21, 1988. Recommendation toapprove_modifieation of.request.from Grou• D namics Inc to..ehan;e summer voile ball t•urna- ment. .rom a Women's..Pro-, o leyball Tournament to, a. Perspn.,TQurnament. Memorandum from Community Resources Coordinator Mary Rooney dated June 23, 1988. tropQsed Action; To approve the Women's Pro -Volleyball ournament to a 6 -Person Tournament with the change that Coors Lite Beer not be a sponsor. Motion Williams - dies for lack of a second. 3 Minutes 6-28-88 Action;., To approve the modification request from Group Dynamics, Inc. to change summer volleyball tournament from a Women's Pro -Volleyball Tournament to a 6 -Person Tournament. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. (q) Recommendation.to.approve.award.of.bid.for_.excess.work- ers',cQmpensation.insurance. Memorandum from Risk Man- ager Robert A. Blackwood dated June 22, 1988. (r) Recommendation,to approve a new_nottosexceed,cost_for sanitary.sewer.design. CIF,47-405) for Harris.& Asoci- gates_in_�the.,pm901 t„_0_ 5.Q427,d Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 22, 1988. (s) Recommendatioi to.approveSOuth Bay_COrridor.,Steering Committee.Joint,Powers Agreement and apprQvg.membership fee of $100 to,be appropriated from.Prospecti.ve_Expendi- tures. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 23, 1988. MOTION.,.TQ WAIVE, FURTHER READING Action: To waive further reading of any resolution or ordinance on tonight's agenda. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - None 2. ORDINANCES AND,R.E$OJ.UTIONS (a) ORDINANCE .NO. .88 2 AN ORDIN NCE OF THE ITT OFHER- MOSA.B ACH,.CAL„FORNIA, STABLISHING AFIREFLOW .FEE TO UPGRADE FIRE PROTECTION AN TO ASSIST. CONSTRUCTION PROD - CTS _ 0 M UN ORM ,FIRE,.CODE REQUIREMENTS. For adoption. Action; To adopt Ordinance No. 88-932. Motion Creighton, second Mayor Simpson. So ordered noting a NO vote by Williams. inal,,.Action; To appoint a temporary subcommittee con- sisting of Councilmembers Rosenberger and Williams to work with the City Manager to bring back a Resolution of Intention to Council as soon as possible regarding the upgrade of the water lines, testing of water, water flow, use of asbestos pipe, use of all monies collected for upgrade, contractural relationship with the water supplier, etc. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (b) ORDINANCE No. 8-9 3.- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA.BEACH, CALIFORNIA,, REPEALING,LEGALLT_INCONSISTENT AND SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE ORDINANCES FROM HE HERMOSA BEACH_,CITYCODE. For adoption. 4 Minutes 6-28-88 Ac ion: To adopt Ordinance No. 88-933. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. (0) ORD_INANCE.NQ 88-934,-,AN.ORDINANCE OF.THE CITY OF,_HER- OSA B ACH CALI ORNIA CONFIRM NG THE ..REPORT OF TH DIRFCTOR.OF PUBLIC WORKS DATED „APRIL,M13,,19 ; PREPARED PURSUANT TO RESOL ION NO - 18,AND APPROVED PUR UANT 0R SOLUTION, NO.:: -5131 OF. SAID COUNCIL,.AND.THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIQNS, ESTIMAtR,..DIAGRAM-AND. ASSESSMENT CONTAINED IN SAID 'EP+RT- .,ORDERING C R AIN CROS ING GUARD,MAIN ENANCE SERVICES,TO,BE FURNISHED AND MAIN- TUNED FOR. T[1E, FISCAL .YEAR ,BEGINNING,.JUL$,1, . 19 Q. For adoption. AGtion; To adopt Ordinance No. 88-933. Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon. So ordered. (d) A ,RESOLUTION.,,APPROVING FINAL PARCEL, MAP .#18853 .FOR .A OUR- NIT CONDOMINIUM PRO ECT LOCAT D AT . 50 LOMA For a•option. Memorandum from Planning Director Mic ael Schubach dated June 20, 1988. Antim To adopt Resolution No. 88-5159 entitled "A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #18853 FOR A FOUR -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1550 LOMA DRIVE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (e) AN ORDINANCE_ AMENDING SECTION, 1-7.3_. "NOTICE .TO . API'EAR- TIME".QF,tiTHE.HERMOSADBEACH CITY CODE. For introduction. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated June 14, 1988. Actions To introduce Ordinance No. 88-936 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE ATTACHED TEXT AMENDMENT TO HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE SECTION 1-7.3 'NOTICE TO APPEAR -TIME'." Motion Mayor Simpson, second Creighton. So ordered. (f) 4! RESOLUTION . To RECYCLE„TAPE _,RECORDINGS , OF , CITY CQUNNCIL MEETINGS. For adoption. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated June 21, 1988. Action; To adopt Resolution No. 88-5160 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE RECYCLING OF TAPES USED TO RECORD THE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 180 DAYS (6 MONTHS) AFTER THE OCCURRENCE OF THE EVENT RECORDED.” Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered noting NO votes by Sheldon and Williams. - 5 Minutes 6-28-88 (g) A ,RESOLUTIO l SU PPORTING_A,.'ROMPT ELECTION_ ON _,THE. QUES- TION OF .INCORPORATION OF_,THE ,PROPOSED CITY_.OF MALIBU, SALFORNtA, For adoption. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated June 23, 1988. I'roposeclAot on;, To adopt Resolution No. 88- enti- tled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING A PROMPT ELECTION ON THE QUESTION OF INCORPORATION OF THE PROPOSED CITY OF MALIBU, CALIFORNIA." Motion Mayor Simpson - dies for lack of a second. ct on- To receive and file the report and send a Tet- er to the proposed City of Malibu indicating our sup- port and offering them the City Council's best wishes. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered noting noting a NO vote by Williams. 3. ITEMS.REMOVED FROM_THE.CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Consent Calendar items (b), (g), (k) and (p) were pulled for further discussion at this time but are listed in order for clarity. (k) Recommendation .tQ,.rece ve and _file status report4on City HaXardous. Waste. Management , Prograr, and_ CQuny__ HazardokA Waste Mapagement•.PJ.an. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated May 17, 1988. (Con- tinued by Counoilmember Williams from 5/24/88 and 6/14/ 88 meetings.) Both Mayor Simpson and Couneilmember Williams commended Janice Silver for an excellent report. .12142a To receive and file this report. Motion Williams, second Mayor Simpson. So ordered. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM , TIJE , PUBLIC. None SPECIAL OJ DER OF,.BUSINESS 5. RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE ALTERNATIVE_.HOURS.OF.OpERA- TION FOR CITY HALL OFFICES. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated May 16, 1988. (Con- tinued from 5/24/88 and 6/14/88 meetings.) The staff report was presented by Personnel Director Robert Blackwood. Action: To authorize continuation of the 4/10 alterna- tive schedule for six months (through December 1988) and then evaluate the schedule for effectiveness. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon 6 Minutes 6-28-88 Amen4ment_to_MQt4Qn; To have staff return at the end of the six month extention with alternate solutions (flext five-day schedule, etc.) Motion Rosenberger - Accepted by both the maker of the motion and the second. So ordered. Jerry Compton, 832 - 7th Street asked Council to consider scheduling inspections on Fridays. A recess was called at 9:16 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:30 P.M. PU¢LIC„HEARINo 6. REZONE SIF,.AREA 7 FROM R.2„TO R-1 ,ORJO. SUCH OTHER_ ZONE AS„DEEMEDMAPPROPRIATE_$Y.. CITY COUNCIL„AND ADOMAN,.EN- yI RbNMENTAL.„ N EGATIVE_ DECLARATION„ WITH, ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 21, 1988. Supplemental information - letter from Andrew & Kathleen Muckersie, 1639 Prospect dated June 24, 1988. The staff report was presented by Planning Director Michael Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Jerry._ Compton, 832 - 7th Street, presented the Planning Commission recommendation. Carl Kirstner, 1720 Prospect Andrew Muckersie, 1639 Prospect Bill Gray, 1115 - 7th Street Paul Normandie, 1714 Golden Avenue Lowell Sterritt, 1619 Golden Avenue Leland Ferro for Violet Ferro, 1727 Golden Avenue William Harman, 1641 Golden Avenue Paul Matthies, 1714 Prospect Diane Gorrell, 1737 Prospect Brian Kinel, 1725 Golden Avenue The Public Hearing was closed. AetlQn; To approve the Planning Commission.recommenda- tion that all of area 7 be rezoned to R -2B and introduce Ordinance No. 88-937 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION” with changes to delete lines 3 through 9 on page 1 and change line 13 to read "Rezone area 7 from R-2 to R -2B legally described as follows:” Motion Rosenberger, second Simpson - 7 - Minutes 6-28-88 AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - None 7. TEXT,, AMENDMENT TO,_ADD,,, "ELEMENTAR7 SCHOOL, GRADES _X-8, SUBJECT_TO.A„C QNDITIONAL.USE.PERMIT” TO THE t-1,_PERMIT- ,TED, USE.LIST..AND,At,NEGATIVEDECLARATION, WITH_ ORDINANCE F I TRODUC ION. Memorandum from Planning Director Miehae Schubach dated June 20, 1988. The staff report was presented by City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft. The Public Hearing was opened. No one coming forward, the Public Hearing was closed. et' : To approve the staff recommendation and introduce Ordinance No. 88-938 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD 'ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, GRADES K-8, C.U.P. REQUIRED' TO THE R-1 ZONE, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE, AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION" with addition of sections re publication, adoption, etc. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - None 8. TEXT AMENDMENT. TO iAMEND, OR, REPEAL ,BILTMORE_;SITE S.e,A, ORbINANCE ,NO. , 8 .-751 WITH 'RO1OSED ORDINANCE_ FOR .INTRQ- DUCZIQN. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 22, 1988. The staff report was presented by Planning Director Michael Schubach. Mayor Simpson asked that the record show that Council - members Creighton and Sheldon left the dais at 11:13 P.M. and returned at 11:16 P.M. City Attorney Lough stated that staff has been in con- sultation with Santa Fe regarding this issue because of the potential trade for the Biltmore Site and they have come up with a substantial number of modifications they would suggest and asked him to convey to the Council those modifications. After looking at the suggestions made, City Council may want to send this matter back to the Planning Commission for their meeting of July 5, 1988. One of the main issues not covered by the Plan- ning Commission was how to handle typical Conditional Use Permit type issues. Also the issue of the public park versus a garden -type plaza - the same type of use but it would give the private landowner more control over their land. 8 Minutes 6-28-88 Therefore, the City Attorney suggested that: this Public hearing be opened; public testimony taken; refer this matter back to the Planning Commission so that issues dealing with the Conditional Use Permit types of issues, parking issues, and some of the issues discussed by Mr. Schubach regarding landscaping and other types of ap- provals can be resolved, and have them report back to Council at the meeting of July 12; continue the Public Hearing at that time; close the Public Hearing and take a vote. The Railroad is asking that the Specific Plan be ap- proved by Council. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak was Jerry Compton, Planning Commission representative, who felt it was not necessary to send this matter back to the Planning Commission. n: To continue the Public Hearing open to July 12, 1988 and refer the Specific Plan back to the Planning Commission with all information available. Motion Mayor Simpson, second Rosenberger m rldment_�tQ,_MQt g : To insure that the Planning Com- mission reflects the exact development of 1985 (height, lot coverage, etc.) Motion Sheldon - accepted by both the maker and second of the motion AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - None 9. HEARING, TO. REVIEW DELINQUENTg.5FUSE,CH4RGES.FOR_CQNSIP- ERATION, OF PLACING ,SAID CHARGES ON .ISE TAX ROLLS,AS„ 4 SPECIAI A$SESSMENT,�WITH„RESOLUTION), Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated June 16, 1988. The Public Hearing was opened. No one coming forward, the Public Hearing was closed. C i To approve the staff recommendation and adopt Resolution No. 88-5161 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY ASSESSOR TO INCLUDE DELINQUENT REFUSE BILLS AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO BE COLLECTED AT THE SAME TIME AND IN THE SAME MANNER AS COUNTY TAXES.” Motion Williams, second Rosenberger. So ordered. 10. PROPOSED..RESOL.UTION.AMENDING R£SOLUTION,NO. 82-452 I�1- CRE4SIN9 TUE .PARKING_PERMZT FEES. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated May 17, 1988. Supplemental information - cards from Mrs. R. Felsing, Jeff Dunlop, Mark L. Shaw and an unsigned card. - 9 - Minutes 6-28-88 The Public Hearing was opened. No one coming forward, the Public Hearing was closed. PrOnO40„400.p11t To receive and file. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger NOES - Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson Motion fails Agtiorr, To approve the staff recommendation and adopt Resolution No. 88-5162 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA-BEACH, CALIFORNIA REPEALING RESOLUTION 84-4749 AND AMENDING SECTION 8, PARAGRAPHS (a), (b), (c), AND (d) OF RESOLUTION 82-4524, INCREASING THE FEE FOR ANNUAL PARKING PERMITS FROM $20.00 TO $25.00." Motion Sheldon, second Mayor Simpson. So ordered noting NO votes by Creighton and Rosenberger Action; To complete the agenda. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered noting a NO vote by Williams. MUNCIPAL_MATTERS 11. REPORT _. QN , STATUS.. OF , STUDY OF , PARKING REMOVAL, ON _THE,,, WEST SIDE_ OF P1CLF.IC_ COAST IIGHWAY BETWEEN 3_P.M., AND 7 P.M, Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 6, 1988. The staff report was presented by Public Works Director Anthony Antich. Speaking to Council was Jerry Compton who reiterated the Planning Commission recommendation. A tum; To approve the staff recommendation as follows: 1. Require a focused study for the west -side PCH parking removal and that this study be included in the on- going Circulation Element study. 2. Appropriate $5,000 from the State Gas Tax Fund balance to the Circulation Element for the provision of including PCH and addressing the environmental impacts identified in the environmental assessment. 3. Adjust the contract cost not to exceed from $70,000 to $75,000. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered noting a NO vote by Creighton. 12. BALLO MEASURE CO FIRMING BU INESS LICENSE TAX INCREA SINCE,AUGUST_31, 19: Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated June 20, 1988. The staff report was presented by City Attorney James P. Lough. ES - 10 - Minutes 6-28-88 Action: To approve the wording of the ordinance to be placed on the November, 1988 ballot entitled "AN OR- DINANCE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CAL- IFORNIA, CONFIRMING AND AMENDING CHAPTERS 17 (LICENSES AND PERMITS) AND 30 (TAXATION) CONCERNING BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES, TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAXES AND PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES TAXES" with the addition of the City Manager's recommendation that adds a cost of living escalator provision for rates that do not otherwise ad- just for inflation. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered. 13. MISCELLANEOUS..ITEMS AND. REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) Recommendation,fgr_;Special,:Meeting att6 PAM. 9P July,5, 1986 o. epnduct, Closed Session, on real _state negotia- tion*,, (Oral report) Action: To approve scheduling a Special Meeting at 6:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 5, 1988 to conduct a Closed Ses- sion on real estate negotiations. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. 14. MISCELLANBaUS ITEMS AND. REPORTS -,.CITY COUNCIL, (a) 4tatus.rep9rt re.,railroad,right-of-Nay. (Reserved on agenda in case there is new information to report.) None. (b) ga11ot„i4sues. Action; To delete item 4 from the suggested ballot measure list. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. EprthqrAqtAopt To place on the ballot the sale of the Biltmore site, Lot C and development rights to a hotel as substantial payment for purchase of the Greenbelt (formerly Railroad right-of-way), with the hotel specific plan and development agreement to be approved by this measure. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. E.4a1„A4i9n; To place selling the Biltmore site and zone at C-2, proposed wording to come back at the next meeting. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered noting a NO vote by Rosenberger. proposedAetion Staff to prepare a ballot measure to sell the Biltmore site as R-2. Motion Creighton - dies for lack of a second. - 11 - Minutes 6-28-88 15. OTHFA.MATTER$. CITY_COUNCII. (a) Vacancies,- Boards,and,,COmmissions Planning Commission - 2 Commissioners ending June 30, Nominations - Sheldon - Rosenberger Williams - Creighton - Simpson - Vote - Sheldon - Rosenberger Willams - Creighton - Simpson - Ketz Edwards Beavers Ketz Edwards Ketz Edwards Ketz Ketz Edwards for terms 1992. Edwards Edwards Beavers Edwards Edwards Edwards Edwards Beavers Edwards Edwards Applicants John Edwards and Christine Ketz were thereby appointed to the Planning Commission for four-year terms ending June 30, 1992. Acs Retiring Planning Commissioners Compton and DeBellis to receive appropriate acknowledgment at a fu- ture City Council meeting. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered. Fina,_Action Staff to send letters to the unsuccess- ful applicants. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered. ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, hour of 12:17 A.M. to a Special Meeting to July 5, 1988 at the hour of 6:00 P.M. the City of Hermosa June 29, 1988 at the be held on Tuesday, l Deputy City Clerk a - 12 - Minutes 6-28-88 • FINANCE-8FA340 1111E,17:54:03 • PAY VENDOR NAME • CtT ror HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0001 • FOR 07/12/88 DATE 07/07/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF POM CHK M • .DESCRIPTION _ _ DATE INVC PROJ A ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • H CANADA LIFE 00046 001-400-1212-4188 01084 $775.94 00008 26874 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 07/06/88 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS `0.00 07/07/88 • • *0* VENDOR TOTAL ******w********U ******w�* ********************41w,**.. $775.94 r • • • H MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES. INC. 02272 001-400-2101-6900 00297 $1.072.55 00059 26873 INITIATE LEASE/PD JEEPS 07/06/88 POLICE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 07/07/88 • *** VENDOR TOTAL ************ 0* 00000lHI0000*00************000000000000000000*,0000** $1.072.55 • H MYERS STEVENS 1 COMPANY 00091 001-400-1212-4188 01083 $853.20 00013 26875 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 07/06/88 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 07/07/88 • ***VENDOR TOTAL***************0********************0***********0*****ww*0***00**0* $853.20 • $2.701.69 *** PAY CODE TOTAL *0 0000* • • • - A-1 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 02180 001-400-2101-5400 00168 $1.337.64 67290-0 06350 26880 PAPINF 7POL.ICE-^3900 06/22/08 POLICE /EQUIPMENT $0.00 07/07/88 • 02180 001-400-8606-5400 00010 $1.262.51 05684 26880 OFC EQUIP/POLICE REMODEL 06/30/88 CIP 86-606 /EQUIPMENT $0.00 07/07/88 • VENDOR TOTAL ************ _.. ._**u********* ************ $2.600.15 R A-1 OFFICE EQUIPMENT R ACTION DOOR REPAIR •M' • 02323 001-400-8604-4201 00077 $850.00 14506 05343 26881 REP GARAGE DOOR/FIRE 14506 06/29/88 CIP 86-604 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/07/88 • $850.00 *0* VENDOR TOTAL *************00000**000000000*000****0****0000********00*0*00000000* R ADVANCE ELEVATOR • 00003 001-400-4204-4321 00362 $2.500.00 20143 06411 26882 REPLACE ELEVATOR VALVE 20143 06/28/88 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT $0.00 07/07/88 • *0* VENDOR TOTAL *0000000 **$0****0**************************0000*0*** R AMDPD PY 89 DUES/M. 8TUROEB $2. 500. 00 00416 001-400-1206-4315 00030 $120.00 06142 26888 07/01/88 DATA PROCESSING /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 07/07/88 1*• • • 0 • FINANCEm4FA040 dr PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION,_ • • dP .44 • • • '0* VENDOR TOTAL ' C!tv-aF' < HBRM08A BEACH 'DEMAND LIST __FOR 07/12/88 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC _ PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0002 DATE 07/07/88 INV/REF POM CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *120. 00 R AMERICAN JAIL A880CIATION 01820__ 001-400-2101-4315 00100 *20.00 DUES/A. ALTFELD 07/01/88 POLICE /MEMBERSHIP ""'_ VIRO)00.ms, ._.._. ... wa«u** *►**********«w«► *20.00 AMERICAN STYLE FOODS _ MISC CTi09%JUN 08 • '*0 VENDOR TOTAL. 00857 001-400-2101-4306 00538 *104.00 06/30/08 POLICE R R. 0.*ARNOLD FLOOR TILE/OD REMODEL VENDOR TOTAL 40•11*wrws 1330 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE «wo*wwu*** *104. 00 06332 26884 *0.00 07/07/88 00063 26885 *0.00 07/07/88 01199 001-400-8606-4309 00013 *131.00 1330 06365 26886 06/30/88 CIP 87-606 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 07/07/88 R ASAP FIRE PROTECTION ANNUAL FIRE NODD INSP. ** *131. 00 00250 001-400-4204-4321 00363 *120.00 7696 04%01/80 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT w* VENDOR TOTAL ***ems N **** a0NN► oa**w,'0'0 R AT & SF RAILWAY CO. RAILROAD RIGHT OF NAY *120.00 7696 05348 26887 *0.00 07/07/08 00028 001-400-1208-4201 00454 *85.00 688-060472 06221 60472 07/01/08 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 *85. 00 *0* VENDOR TOTAL. +►www ***w*www**a**w*+►w+w+fw*sww* R AURELI FLAG & BANNER PIER BANNERS 01497 001-400-6101-4309 00523 *332.28 18642 06/22/08 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS www VENDOR TOTAL ...«w««*.up Mw**«*** **1I H ** 1*** ******** *p** ,H,w***** R BANNER SIGN COMPANY REPAIR PARKING BANNERS *332.28 00834 110-400-3302-4309 00423 *329.10 05/31/88 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *ww VENDOR TOTAL **** **a*4wwwwe,,w«ww1w'r*Mw****** . **** R BAUER COATING & CHEMICALS BT PAINT SPRAYER PARTS 33869 *329. 10 00251 115-400-3104-4309 00573 *86.95 06/20/08 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 26888 07/07/08 18642 05793 26889 *0.00 07/07/88 06132 26890 *0.00 07/07/88 33869 05794 26891 *0.00 07/07/88 • • FINN CE-8FA340 TIME 17:54:03 • PAY VENDOR NAME • ! • • •' • • • • • "' • • • • • DESCRIPTION www VENDOR TOTAL R BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS MIISC CHOS/JUNE A9 • ,• CITU -OF MERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/12/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0003 DATE 07/07/88 INV/REF PO * CHK • AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *86.95 00005 001-400-1208-4305 00523 *448.18 06/30/88 OEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES www VENDOR TOTAL._ $448.18 JANINE*BOZEMAN ANIMAL TRAP REF'UNti 5b148 06/30/88 02343 001-210-0000-2110 00066 26892 *0.00 07/07/88 02253 4100.00 58748 05949 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 40.00 www VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwwww w+**1141 wwww****00w00w0*ww0w0 $100. 00 R OARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER - PETTY -CAIR•1/JUNE SA -" . R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/JUNE 88 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER "PETTY- CASH/JUN _80 . _ .-. 8 OARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/JUNE 88 R OARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY-CASH/JUNE 88 R OARY.BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/JUNE 88 R OARY.BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/JUNE 88 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/JUNE 88 R OARY.BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/JUNE 88 R OARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/JUNE 88 02016 001-400-1101-4305 00182 06/30/88 CITY COUNCIL 02016 001-400-1121-4305 00078 06/30/88 CITY CLERK 02016 001-400-1202-4305 00162 06/10/88 FINANCE ADMIN 02016 001-400-1203-4305 00148 06/30/88 PERSONNEL 02016 001-400-1207-4316 00021 06/30/88 BUS LICENSE 02016 06/30/88 02016 06/30/88 02016 06/30/88 001-400-2201-4305 00193 FIRE 001-400-2201-4309 00474 FIRE 001-400-2201-4316 00131 FIRE 02016 001-400-4101-4316 00109 06/30/88 02016 001-400-4202-4201 00194 06/30/88 PLANNING PUB WKS ADMIN *26.31 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *0.50 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *5.65 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *33.46 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $30.00 /TRAINING *15.81 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *6.34 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $10.31 /TRAINING *42.00 /TRAININO *2.05 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 26893 07/07/88 05942 26893 *0.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 40.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 40.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 *0.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 *0.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 *0.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 *0.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 40.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 40.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 $0.00 07/07/88 0 0 1 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME_'17: 54:.03 . . • PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION • � I • • • • r I • IP R OARYeBRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/JUNE 88 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY_ TREASURER PETTY • CABH/.JIJME 88 R GARY•BRUTSCH.CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/JUNE 88 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/JUNE 88 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/JUNE 88 R GARV*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURiER PETTY CASH/JURE 88 R GARY*BRUTBCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/JUNE 88 R OARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PE1fv cA8H/.JUNE ee- R GARY*BRUTBCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/JUNE 88 wow OARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PE1''f4f 'CASH/JUNE -88 CI'kV"` AIROMOBA BEACH LIST I_ 2' FOR',07/12/BIB VMD * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC _•._PROD,• ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02016 001-400-4202-4303 00301 06/30/88 PUB 14(S ADMIN 02016 001-400-4204-4201 00252 06/30/88 BLDG MAINT 02016 001-400-4204-4309 00978 06/30/88 BLDG MAINT 02016 001-400-4204-4316 00005 06/30/88 BLDG MAINT 02016 001-400-4601-4305 00513 06/30/88 COMM RESOURCES 02016 001-400-6101-4309 00522 06/30/88 PARKS 02016 110-400-3302-4305 00430 06/30/88 PARKING ENF 02016 110-400-3302-4309 00422 06/30/88 PARKING ENF 02016 110-400-3302-4310 00067 06/30/88 PARKING ENF 02016 110-400-3302-4316 00114 06/30/88 PARKING ENF • C PAGE 0004 --1 0 DATE 07/07/88 INV/REF PO 0 CHK 0 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *0.30 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $13.63 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 077.82 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $15.00 /TRAINING *0.10 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $22.11 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.50 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *11.72 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $5.00 /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $4.00 /TRAINING VENDOR TQTAL ** ***+w***4HHH ** H ** ►***********uw **w-woww**l e******ww***w*n****w* R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. ENO SERV/JUNE 88 36415 00630 115-400-8302-4201 00024 06/24/88 CIP 87-302 •wt VENDOR TOTAL sNM*NUII**M* UM UMe******w►ww*M ***** ** R BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE - - PU*JaC Ai I ONB/PARKING VENDOR TOTAL $322.61 *13.765.24 *13,765.24 00253110-400-3302-4305 00434 $34.38 07/01/88 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R THE*BU BEAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS SUBSCRIPTION/PERSONNEL -5203 ***** **** *34.38 01269 001-400-1203-4316 00132 $276.00 07/01/88 PERSONNEL /TRAINING 05942 26895 $0.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 $0.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 $0.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 $0.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 $0.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 $0.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 $0.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 $0.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 $0.00 07/07/88 05942 26895 $0.00 07/07/88 56415 06475 26896 $0.00 07/07/88 06150 26897 $0.00 . 07/07/88 863-5203 05849 26898 $0.00 07/07/88 • 1 • • • • • • • • 4 • PINNACE-SFA340 • TIME 17:34: 00 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION NNA VENDOR TOTAL r -"--C`ITY OF LMERM08A BEACH - FORDE?UWD IST FOR 07/12/88 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN • AMOUNT DATE INV; PROJ_N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY 80XE9/POLIO sC`_RtcORos 13212 AAA VENDOR TOTAL 00034 001-400-2101-4305. 06/10/88 POLICE ANNNwwNNNw PAGE 0005 DATE 07/07/88 INV/REF PO A CHK • AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *276.00 00742 *580.17 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES CA ASSOC OF POLICE TRNO OFCRS tWts/A: ALTFELD . . wowwaowuww 5580. 17 02348 001-400-2101-4315 00099 *25.00 07/01/88 POLICE /MEMBERSHIP *AA VENDOR TOTAL ANN*AN uu*Aw.NNww *25.00 _R CA STATE ASSOC OF LOCAL ELEC 00785 001-400-1141-4315 00021 *40.00 DUE$l0. ORUf CH 07/01/88 CITY TREASURER /MEMBERSHIP AAA VENDOR TOTAL AA wN *40.00 R CALIF MUNICIPAL_ TREASURERS 01167 001-400-1141-4316 00029 *26.63 'PUSL'ICATI %6. BRUTSCH 120 07/01/88 CITY TREASURER /TRAINING AAA VENDOR TOTAL NANNNNUANN******* ON R CALIF. MUNICIPAL TREASURERS REG/BRUTSCH APRIL CONF *26.63 01148 001-400-1141-4317 00006 *160.00 06/17/88 CITY TREASURER /CONFERENCE EXPENSE 0AN VENDOR TOTAL wi►wuwwuwww**** rtwNwf*www*w*H►wr►wwMww►wwwwwwwwwww*w**w _ _rwww**w R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE MON-WATER BILLS/JUN 88 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE MON WATER BILLS/JUN 88 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE MON-WATER RILLS/JUN110 ANN VENDOR TOTAL 00016 00.1-400-4204-4303 00238 06/30/88 BLDG MAINT 00016 001-400-6101-4303 00206 06/30/88 00016 115-400-3101-4303 00163 06/30/88. PARKS MEDIANS *160.00 *543.12 /UTILITIES *1,305.03 /UTILITIES $2,578.53 /UTILITIES R CAPIO DUES/M. TERCERO *4,426.68 00367 001-400-1205-4315 00022 535.00 07/01/88 CABLE TV /MEMBERSHIP 13212 05638 26899 50.00 07/07/88 06357 26900 *0.00 07/07/88 05950 26901 *0.00 07/07/88 120 05079 26902 *0.00 07/07/88 05951 26903 *0.00 07/07/88 00656 26904 50.00 07/07/88 00656 26904 $0.00 07/07/88 00656 26904 *0.00 07/07/88 06152 26905 $0.00 07/07/88 • • I .e. VENDOR TOTAL • • • • • PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION. VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE-INVC PROJ 8_ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CAREERTRACK. INC. OEM REO/M. BUTEN j ••• VENDOR TOTAL PACE 0006 DATE 07/07/88 INV/REF PO N CHK A AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP •••• $35.00 00448._. 110-400-3302-4316 00115 $295.00 PARKING ENF /TRAINING 12777 05/19/88 $295.00 R J. I. *CASE CREDIT CORP. 01147 160-400-3102-6900 00059 $748. 32 JULY LEASE PAYMENT 07/01/68 SEWER/ST DRAIN /LEASE PAYMENTS ••• VENDOR TOTAL ._. _ ••w••••••• *748. 32 R CENTRAL BANK LEASING LEASE PMT/JUL1f 88 • • • f • I . • • • • 01226 001-400-2101-6900 07/01/88 POLICE 00300 $1.978.59 /LEASE PAYMENTS *••••••••••••• $1.978.59 R CENVAL___ LEASING 58 00879 001-400-2101-6900 00299 $594.51 JUCV LE PAYPEW _.._ _ __ . 07%01 %88 POLICE /LEASE PAYMENTS ••• VENDOR TOTAL. «•••••w••••••••••••• $594. 51 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-2101-4311 00512 $6.73 MSC CHOE/JUNE 88 06/30/88 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE ••• VENDOR TOTAL $6.73 R CMI. INC. 01450 001-400-2101-4309 00151 $287.58 IN'POKILVZ R REPAIR 80305 06/08/88 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ••• VENDOR TOTAL ••••••••••••••• •w••• $287.58 R L. N. •CURTIS 6 SON MiertV_ i/IEYRE R L. N. •CURTIB & SON HOSE NOZZLES/FIRE DEPT 00850 001-400-2201-4187 06/30/88 FIRE 00850 001-400-2201-4309 06/30/88 FIRE 00098 *314.18 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 00473 $1.038.70 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1712777 06123 26906 $0.00 07/07/88 00021 26907 $0.00 07/07/88 00024 26908 $0.00 07/07/88 00020 26909 $0.00 07/07/88 00069 26910 $0.00 07/07/88 80585 06355 26911 $0.00 07/07/88 05341 26912 $0.00 07/07/88 05341 26912 $0.00 07/07/88 1 • 0 411. • PINANCE—BFA340 TIME, 17:54:03 TTY OF FEMORA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/12/88 PAGE 0007 DATE 07/07/88 PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK M DESCRIPTION _ _ DATE INVC _ PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R L. N. *CURTIS $s SON FIRE HOSES 00850 001-400-2201-3400 00048 $13.899.32 05329 26912 06/30/88 FIRE /EQUIPMENT $0.00 07/07/88 •** VENDOR _TOTAL *********MOMw **IHI* **********www 1*********** **** ***************** DAPPER TIRE CO. MISC CHOS/JUNE 88 *15.252.20 01390 105-400-2601-4311 00104 $197.88 00612 26913 06/30/88 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 07/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $197.88 R DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 00288 001-400-8601-4201 00033 $157.00 06457 26914 HAZ MATERIAL PERMIT FEE 06/29/88 CIP 86-601 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $157.00 R THE *DEVELOPMENT 00147 001-400-2101-4305 00740 $106.50 00514 26915 MISC CHOS/MAY 88 05/31/88 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 07/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL************************s******************************************* *106. 50 R M. O. *DION & SONS. INC. 00085 001-400-1208-4310 00129 $4.435.21 06459 26916 GASOLINE/CITY YARD/JUNE 06/30/88 GEN APPROP /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************M************************************ • *4.435.21 $0.00 07/07/88 R LAURIE*DUKE 00955 001-400-1101-4319 00051 *63.88 06604 26917 MAYORAL OUTGOING PLAQUE 07/06/88 CITY COUNCIL /SPECIAL EVENTS $0.00 07/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL**M********M******************************************************** $63. 88 • R DUNCAN INDUSTRIES 00122 110-400-3302-4309 00424 $300.58 2615-0 06136 26918 PARKING METER PARTS 615-0 06/21/88 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 07/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $300.58 R ELEK—TEK. INCORPORATED 02338 001-400-1206-4303 00306 $275.55 273299 06130 26919 $0.00 07/07/88 COMP PRINTER SUPPLIES 73299 06/16/88 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES • •1 .. ' • • •. • • • • v. • • PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VENDOR TOTAL **•N****w R FABIANO CORPORATION WORK GUAR REFUND r CIT1fDF� BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/12/88 VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC____ PROD M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 01713 001-210-0000-2110 53023 06/30/88 ******** • 1 PAGE 0008 • DATE 07/07/88 i INV/REF PO M CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $275.55 02259 $75.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL **********w* ******************** R FAMILY PRACTICE ASSOCIATES_ MEb 8E 0/408 1i/ 08 ®8 *75.00 00054 001-400-1203-4320 00200 $70.00 04/30/88 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS *** VENDOR TOTAL **** FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. DELIVERY N ERV/POLICE -- $70. 00 53023 05947 26920 *0.00 07/07/88 05857 26921 00.00 07/07/88 01962 001-400-2101-4305 00743 $11.00 6-482-62270 06356 62270 06/20/88 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****MI►** *****r********** ********** $11.00 R GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION 02335 001-400-2101-4305 00739 $410.55 11-363626 06303 DARE WWRKBODKB 43666 06/08/09 210004 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0. 00 *** VENDOR TOTAL ********w* ***** ********************** $410.55 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CH08/JUNE 8A - R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/JUNE 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE dHG8/JUNE 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/JUNE 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY YeUrtHCISTAkIt OS R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CH08/JUNE 88 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00173 $41.12 06/30/88 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1122-4304 00026 06/30/88 ELECTIONS 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00105 $223.92 06/30/88 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00162 $44.40 06/30/88 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00174 $88.78 06/30$08 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00179 $65.77 06/30/88 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE $54.26 /TELEPHONE 26922 07/07/88 26923 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 *0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 • • • • • • • • • • FIP1N OMIPA$*d TILE $7:54:03 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHOS/JUNE 88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CH08/JUNG 88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CROS/JUNE 88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TEM C1464/JUNE dB._. . . GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHOS/JUNE 88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/JIVE 88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHOB/JUNE 88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE-0408/JUNE-S8 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHO8/JUNE 88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/JUNE 88. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHO8/JUNE 88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CH08/JUNE 88 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/JUNE 98 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE-CMS/JUKE S8 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHOBIJUNE 88 --CtfflffirAmmeidA BEACH . . DEMAND LIST FOR 07/12/88 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE_INVC_ PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00178 06/30/88 PERSONNEL 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00108 06/30/88 *29.59 /TELEPHONE $214.23 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00091 $35.35 06/30/08 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE 00015 06/30/68 001-400-2101-4304 00259 $491.95 POLICE /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00114 06/30/89 FIRE 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00167 06/30/88 $270.56 /TELEPHONE *4.94 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2701-4304 00070 06/30/88 *4.20 CIVIL DEFENSE /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00180 06/30/88 PLANNING 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00178 06/30/88 BUILDING 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00181 06/30/88 $110.17 /TELEPHONE $167.72 /TELEPHONE *297.03 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4204-4321 00364 06/30/88 BLDG MAINT 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00199 06/30/88 PAGE 0009 DATE 07/07/88 INV/REF POM CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $18.35 /BUILDING SAFETY/8ECURIT $271.76 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00105 06/30/88 PARKS 00015 110-400-3301-4304 00085 06/30/88 00015110-400-3302-4304 00176 06/30/68 $1.65 /TELEPHONE *19.86 VEH PKO DIST /TELEPHONE *470.60 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE 00655 26925 •0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 C • • f irommaiimerha4: Tl11/1.171 94.03. - PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 1 411. MID R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGB/JUNE 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/.JUNE 88 *** VENDOR TOTAL BEACH 1".1• .' OENAND LIST FOR 07/12/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE _INVC•.___ PROD N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 145-400-3401-4304 00006 06/30/88 00015 145-400-3402-4304 00006 06/30/88 DIAL A RIDE EBEA GEORGE & AL'S AUTO TOP SHOP REUPHOLSTER CHAIR - _ 2548 $16.66 /TELEPHONE $16.66 /TELEPHONE PAGE 0010 DATE 07/07/88 INV/REF PO 0 CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ****** $2.959.53 01748 001-400-4202-4305 00302 $58.58 06/28/88 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL************e******************* ***************** $58. 58 R GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFCRS ASSOC 00059 001-400-1202-4315 00030 $90.00 DUES/V. COPELAND 40991 07/01/88 FINANCE ADMIN /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL **w****************r** $90. 00 R W. M. *GRAINGER PD EXHAUST FAN 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 00655 26925 $0.00 07/07/88 2548 06451 26926 $0.00 07/07/88 240991 06222 26927 $0.00 07/07/88 01310 001-400-4204-4309 00979 $34.37 445-770876 06455 70876 06/28/88 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 $34.37 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************w*** **************** R GTEL_ TELE MAINT CONTRACT 01340 001-400-1208-5400 00009 $5.460.00 07/01/88 GEN APPROP /EQUIPMENT VENDOR TOTAL ** $5. 460. 00 HALPRIN SUPPLY COMPANY DOO'TB%FIRfi DEPT 95631 *** VENDOR TOTAL 00946 001-400-2201-4187 06/16/8 FIRE 00099 $93.72 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE HANNON. PARK. d LENNON LEGAL 6111V/Jl 46 . *** VENDOR TOTAL $93.72 01079 705-400-1209-4324 00056 0877.50 06/21168 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS;/SETTLEMENTS R HEART OF CALIFORNIA CORP. ANN RENT/VAULT STORAGE 00300 ********** $877.50 26928 07/07/88 06146 26929 $0.00 07/07/88 95631 05346 26930 $0.00 07/07/88 05854 26931 $0.00 07/07/88 00203 001-400-1121-4201 00024 $100.00 202000300 04542 26932 07/01/88 CITY CLERK /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/07/88 • • • I FINANCE-1FA340 i TIM, 17: $4: 03 • • • • • • • i • I • l • • • • • •` PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL R R R HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC 608/MAY 6A 177 77 ` HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/12/89 VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC CH08/MAV 88 HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC CHCS/MAY 89 ****************** 00065 001-400-2101-4311 00509 05/31/88 00065 001-400-4201-4311 00123 05/31/88 BUILDING 00065 110-400-3302-4311 00379 05/31/88 PARKING ENF POLICE • PAGE 0011 DATE 07/07/88 INV/REF PO M CHK 0 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *100. 00 *126. 55 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *16. 00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *4. 00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL **** *****e* ******* R HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY COMPUTER COHOL/HP3000 1/933 *146. 55 00149 001-400-1206-3400 00167 *2.300.40 06/25/88 DATA PROCESSING /EQUIPMENT *** VENDOR TOTAL s*** ************************** R HEYDEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY GORII tum_ Remo. ...' .. . 53022 R HEYDEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY WORK GUAR REFUND 53022 02347 001-210-0000-2110 02257 06/30/88 02347 001-210-0000-2110 02258 06/30/88 *2.300.40 *75. 00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *75. 00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL**********•********************************************************* 0150.00 R MARCIA•HITE REIMB TRAINING BOOR COST 02336 110-400-3302-4316 00113 *37.06 06/23/88 PARKING ENF /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL•**********************************************w******************** R ICMA DUES/A. MASTRIAN 72061 R ICMA DUES/K. B. NORTHCRAFT 71596 00157 001-400-1201-4315 00041 07/01/88 CITY MANAGER 00157 001-400-1201-4315 00042 07/01/88 CITY MANAGER *37. 06 *449. 37 /MEMBERSHIP *487.50 /MEMBERSHIP e** VENDOR TOTAL ******. R IMACS SYSTEMS CORPORATION ADDL SOFTWARE/REP WRITER 1625 *936. 87 02330 001-400-1206-4201 00399 *750.00 06/29/88 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00520 26933 *0.00 07/07/88 00520 26933 *0.00 07/07/88 00520 26933 *0.00 07/07/88 Z517933 00149 26934 *0.00 07/07/88 53022 05946 26935 *0.00 07/07/88 53022 05945 26935 *0.00 07/07/88 06153 26936 *0.00 07/07/88 72061 04876 26937 *0.00 07/07/88 71596 04098 26937 *0.00 07/07/88 1625 06156 26938 *0.00 07/07/08 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 • 4 FINANCE-IFA340 TUIE 17: 54: 03 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION. R IMACS SYSTEMS CORPORATION REPORT WRITER 1608 R IMACS SYSTEMS CORPORATION ADDL SOFTWARE/REP WRITER 1625 "77-4—'-7-cIfiribirmemmemiA MACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/12/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATEINVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02330 001-400-1206-5400 00165 06/24/88 02330 001-400-1206-5400 00166 06/29/88 DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING PAGE 0012 DATE 07/07/88 INV/REF POM CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *4.562.25 1608 06155 26938 /EQUIPMENT *0.00 07/07/88 *318.44 1623 06136 26938 /EQUIPMENT *0.00 07/07/88 *4* VENDOR TOTAL w*w*************4HF*****w ***************w******** *5.630.69 INDEPENDENT CITIES ASSOCIATION CITY DUES/FY 88-89 00372 001-400-1101-4315 00059 *776.00 07/01/88 CITY COUNCIL /MEMBERSHIP *w* VENDOR TOTAL _. **ww** ***w********************w*** *776. 00 R INDEPENDENT CITIES RISK LIABILITY PREM/FY 88-89 01484 705-400-1209-4201 00055 *213.443.00 07/01/88 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *ww VENDOR TOTAL ***w**w*w*www***w *****ww*w***** R INTERCARE, INC. *213.443.00 04100 26939 *0.00 07/07/80 05853 26940 *0.00 07/07/88 01727 001-400-1203-4320 00199 *1.200.00 CT000711 05851 FIRE DEPT PHYSICALS 00711 06/30/88 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS *0.00 *1.200.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL *w** *******w*w***ww*www****w***w**********w****ww*** INTERNATIONAL BUSIPIESS MACHINE FatER .UAE%APR ..M 66335 R INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE MAINT CHCS/JULY 88 00068 001-400-1208-4201 00451 06/10/88 GEN APPROP 00068 001-400-1208-4201 00452 07/01/88 OEN APPROP *244.97 6866355 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *227. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL*******w***************************************w*w****************** *471. 97 R INTERTEC COMPUTER SERVICES ANN COIF PRINTER MAINT 01740 001-400-1206-4201 00401 *3.270.00 07/01/88 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *w* VENDOR TOTAL *www**************w******w*************w **** R GEORGE*I2UMI BLDG PERMIT REFUND 02337 001-300-0000-3801 06/23/88 *3.270. 00 01251 *40.00 /RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION 26941 07/07/88 06240 26942 *0.00 07/07/88 06240 26942 *0.00 07/07/88 06157 26943 *0.00 07/07/88 04958 26944 *0.00 07/07/88 • 1• • 1. • OR e • • • * VENDOR TOTAL w****w*Mww***w*w*****w** *********M** • • • • • • • GI r L T • FINANCE-4FA340 _ Tom„ 17:54:03 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION -- .: `" 119-6P-MERMoMA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/12/88 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT DATE INV; PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION •** VENDOR TOTAL ***************www** w*w*******w***** R TEREA•JOHN$ON MEALS/HOT FIRE TRAINING w** VENDOR TOTAL PAGE 0013 DATE 07/07/88 INV/REF PO M CHK • AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *40. 00 00444 001-400-2101-4313 00162 *7.25 06/22/88 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE. STC R KEYE PROUCTIVITY CENTER BEN REQ/H. - BYAT I 01871 110-400-3302-4316 00116 *125.00 07/01/88 PARKING ENF /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL M****M*w****** R BRIAN*KINEL CITE PMT -REQ 02607 02333 110-300-0000-3302 06/23/88 *7. 25 *125. 00 06366 26945 *0.00 07/07/88 06138 26946 *0.00 07/07/88 21930 *138.00 666100/602607 06250 26947 /COURT FINES/PARKING *0.00 07/07/88 R WAYNE*KODZEFF ANIMAL TRAP REFUND -6i232 02344 001-210-0000-2110 06/30/88 *138. 00 02254 *50.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL *wM****w**M*M* R MICHAEL*LADD COMMS CONS/JUNE 00 - VENDOR TOTAL 0009 *50.00 01978 001-400-1206-4201 00400 *2.428.70 _ 06/20/88 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R RODR IGO P. *CARES CITE PMT REFUND 02334 110-300-0000-3302 35114 06/16/88 *M*1►ww4Fw* *2. 428. 70 21931 *18.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING **w VENDOR TOTAL****w******w***•************w*wwwM*w*w*********www*ww*w************* R LAWSON PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED VARIOUS NUTS/BOLTS 04491 R LAWSON PRODUCTS. INCORPORATED VARIOUS NUTS/CONNECTORS 77630 00076 06/27/88 00076 06/06/88 001-400-4204-4309 00980 BLDG MAINT 105-400-2601-4309 00360 STREET LIGHTING *18. 00 61232 05948 26948 *0.00 07/07/88 0009 06151 26949 *0.00 07/07/88 735114 06149 26950 *0.00 07/07/88 *283.64 684491 06442 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 *382.00 678534/677630 05795 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 26951 07/07/88 26951 07/07/88 • • • • • • • • • 0 • • 1 FINANCE-8FA340 • TI 17:54:09 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCR IPT I ON 4 '` 41ITY OF HERPIOBA BEACH tENAND LIST PAGE 0014 1 8 FOR 07/12/88 DATE 07/07/88 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK M 4 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION • *** VENDOR TOTAL wwww wwww w*ww****** 4665.64 41. • R LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 00800 001-400-1101-4315 00058 4625.00 06602 26952 CITY DUES/FY 88-89 07/01/88 CITY COUNCIL /MEMBERSHIP 40.00 07/07/88 *w* VENDOR TOTAL w*wwwwwwwwwww w****wwww *625.00 R LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE 00214 001-400-1121-4315 00038 4130.00 04541 26953 DUES/K. MIDSTOKKE 07/01/88 CITY CLERK /MEMBERSHIP *0.00 07/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL _ mow* wwww*w*w*w****** *30.00 R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE. INC. 00077 001-300-0000-3838 00601 $42.14 00625 26954 MISC CHCS/JUNE 88 06/30/88 /SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIO $0.00 07/07/88 R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE. INC. 00077 115-400-8302-4201 00025 $36.05 00625 26954 MISC CHCS/JUNE 88 06/30/88 CIP 87-302 $0.00 07/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL *********www**e***e****************************r►**w*************,*** *78. 19 R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. 01320 001-400-2101-4187 00186 *565.99 4678 06322 26955 NEW UNIF EXP/GUZMAN 4678 06/08/88 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *0.00 07/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL -*****4w***************4*********************** www****************** *565.99 R JAMES P.*L000N 00938 001-400-1131-4201 00389 *8.540.00 06603 26956 RETAINER/JUNE 86 06/30/88 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL www******************www*********www******************************** *8, 540. 00 *0.00 07/07/88 R LOUIS THE TAILOR. IN_C, 00079 001-400-2101-4187 00185 $86.16 00626 26957 MISC CHGS/JUNE 00 06/30/88 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *0.00 07/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***--_-.-_ --- ..-. __-- - ********1111111HH144H1**w+►**NNIAHMOHIHNH14ww******ww****** R MANHATTAN CAR WASH MISC CHCS/MAY 88' *86. 16 01146 001-400-2101-4311 00510 *75.00 05/31/88 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00528 26958 *0.00 07/07/88 0 40 Jf r • 0 • •..� • • 4 Ka FINANCE-eFA330 TIME 17:54:03 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ;r - ; aiTlf o* HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/12/86 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ••• VENDOR TOTAL $$$$$*.w .. ....w.w•.•.••..••.•......... R MARINEBANC LEASING CO.. INC. LEASE PMT/JULY 88 - _ -1 PAGE 0015 DATE 07/07/88 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $73. 00 02154 001-400-4205-6900 00010 $417.96 07/01/88 EQUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS ... VENDOR TOTAL .. ..•.•..... $417.96 R MARK IV CHARTER BUS CO. 00290 001-400-4601-4319 00229 $187.86 BU2 SERV/BUMMER PROGRAM 07/01/88 COMM RESOURCES /SPECIAL EVENTS $$$ VENDOR TOTAL ...w ..................** $187.86 R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES. INC. JUN PATROL CAR LEASE R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES. INC. DISPATCH EQUIP LEASE/JUL R MARQUETTE LEABE SERVICES. INC. LEASE PMT/JULY 88 ... 02272 001-400-2101-6900 06/01/88 POLICE 02272 001-400-2101-6900 07/01/88 POLICE 02272 001-400-2101-6900 07/01/88 POLICE 00298 *1.233.52 /LEASE PAYMENTS 00302 $39.843.87 /LEASE PAYMENTS 00303 $1.233.32 /LEASE PAYMENTS VENDOR TOTAL $$$$$$ $$$$$ $$$$ $$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $42,310.91 R MARTIN & CHAPMAN CO. ELECTION MATERIALS 00289 001-400-1122-4201 00154 08/73 06/16/88 ELECTIONS $228.28 68008/73 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ••• VENDOR TOTAL .....w .w..••..........**....•...•. R EVELYNNE•MATSUMOTO BLDG PERMIT REFUND "• 02332 001-300-0000-3801 "61600 06/23/88 *228. 28 01230 $40.00 /RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION ••• VENDOR TOTAL .......s •........•.....•.••.•... *40. 00 R APRIL.MC CURRY DAMAGE DEPOUT REFUND 56931 02345 001-210-0000-2110 06/30/88 00054 26959 $0.00 07/07/86 04879 26960 *0.00 07/07/88 00056 26961 $0.00 07/07/88 00057 26961 $0.00 07/07/88 00056 26961 *0.00 07/07/88 04540 26962 *0.00 07/07/88 61600 04959 26963 $0.00 07/07/88 02255 $73.00 56951 05943 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 ••. VENDOR TOTAL .. ••••.•..•.*rw.4....• $73.00 R MCI MAIL ELEC MAIL SERV/MAY 88 02153 001-400-1206-4304 00107 $10.00 06/10/88 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 26964 07/07/88 00058 26965 *0.00 07/07/88 i • • • • • 4 • • 4 FiNE-BFA340 • TOL 17184: Oa •„ • PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 0 • www VENDOR TOTAL **************w***w*w*w*** *52. 00 41 VENDOR TOTAL yrs .. �, �,+r,:k q REACH LIST PAGE 0016 °'FOR 07/12/88 DATE 07/07/88 VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PON CHK *• GATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R JOBEPHNMEDINA CLARK BLDG DEPOSIT REF. 56946 w *10. 00 02346 001-210-0000-2110 02256 *52.00 56946 05944 26966 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00 07/07/88 06/30/88 R LEBLIE*MILLER PLAN CHECK REFUND 61006 06/23/88 /PLAN CHECK FEES *0.00 07/07/88 02331 001-300-0000-3813 00519 *1,259.00 61006 04960 26967 w*a VENDOR TOTAL ww*****w *******ass ************************** *1,259.00 • www VENDOR TOTAL ******** .__ ****** *82.00 • R MOHLE. GROVER & A880CIATES 01499 115-400-3104-4201 00057 *1,142.50 88-89 06456 26969 ` ENGRG SERV/MAY 88 88-89 06/02/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 07/07/88 www VENDOR TOTAL ****wwww******U**********4***w**w4****************** wwwww ****** R JUAN*MOCEOA JR. 02320 110-300-0000-3302 21937 *82.00 728692/727150 06254 26968 CITE PMT REFUND 27150 06/29/88 /COURT FINES/PARKING *0.00 07/07/88 R MONARCH BROOM • MIBC CHG8/JUNE 98 $1,142.50 00084 001-400-3103-4309 00658 *980.86 00630 26970 06/30/88 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 07/07/88 www VENDOR TOTAL. **a*****w*******w******* **** *980. 86 R CHRIBTOPHER.NAGEL 02324 110-300-0000-3302 21938 *20.00 733996 06255 26971 CITE.PMT REFUND 33996 06/29/88 /COURT FINES/PARKING *0.00 07/07/88 **a VENDOR TOTAL. w*********w************* *20.00 R NATIONAL CAREER WORKSHOPS _ SEM REO/V. C ' • 02203 001-400-1202-4316 00201 *59.00 06244 26972 07/01/88 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL **a*********** wwww****w* *59. 00 R OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER REPAIR POLICE UNIT 10890 06/24/88 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00093 001-400-2101-4311 00511 *811.47 •• *0.00 07/07/88 10890 06353 26973 *0.00 07/07/88 • ..• G - _ . . CI1"Y TSF AERMOSA BEACH --•" I FINANCE-8FA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0017 C .T1.,17: 54:03 FOR 07/12/88 DATE 07/07/88 PAV VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK M 4. DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP •w0 VENDOR TOTAL **********ww*►na*r**wo+www************ ►aww $811.47 R PACIFIC EQUIP & IRRIGATION 00406 110-400-3302-4311 00380 $103.62 20164 05297 26974 CUBHMAN LENSES 20164 06/28/88 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 07/07/88 • ` www VENDOR TOTAL www* $103.62 • ` R PACIFIC SCREEN PRINT 00491 001-400-4601-4308 00122 $123.33 1387 04881 26975 SUMER STAFF SHIRTS/CREB 1387 06/20/88 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS $0.00 07/07/88 4. www VENDOR TOTAL wwww w $123.33 I • 4 • 4 R PAK WEST 00519 001-400-4204-4309 00975 089.01 00632 26976 RISC CF108/JUNE 88 • 06/''10/88 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 07/07/88 www VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwwwwwwwww wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww $89.01 L R PAKAGINO AIDS CORPORATION 02329 001-400-2101-5400 00167 $403.89 68085 06325 26977 BAG SEALER 68085 06/21/8 POLICE /EQUIPMENT $0.00 07/07/88 iir www VENDOR TOTAL wwww wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww $403.89 R PEPSI -COLA BOTTLING COMPANY VEND MACH RENT/JUJL 88 00144 001-400-1208-4201 00453 $31.36 07/01/88 OEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00031 26978 $0.00 07/07/88 • j• www VENDOR TOTAL $31.36 d R PERIPHERAL SYSTEMS REPAIR POLICE COMPUTER 01297 001-400-2101-4305 00741 0440.92 06/21/88 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES www VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwo«•sww wwww4r0**0N w*H►w**HHw*******0** $440. 92 06319 26979 $0.00 07/07/88 R PERVO PAINT CO. 01316 115-400-3104-4309 00574 $3,242.93 66594 06436 26980 STREET PAINT 66594 06/21/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 07/07/88 wow VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwwww wwwwww $3,242.93 R POSTAL INSTANT PRESS 00296 110-400-3302-4305 00431 $27.96 03640 05275 26981 DRIVEWAY PERMITS 03640 03/30/8 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 07/07/8 i 1 BM: 03 ,1�111A!IPf19A0 PAV VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION • rT P1®tNOBA "BEACH :if$ , ; SOWS) LIST POR 07/12/88 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC.,_. PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION w** VENDOR TOTAL ****w*************w***** R PRESENTATION PRODUCTS. INC. REPAIR LETTERING MACHIN 15807 R PRESENTATION PRODUCTS. INC. KROV LETTERING TAPES 15825 01176 06/20/88 01176 06/20/88 001-400-2101-4305 00744 POLICE 001-400-2101-4305 00745 POLICE PAGE 0018 DATE 07/07/88 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $27.96 $97.99 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $324.44 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES www VENDOR TOTAL **w* *w ************w**w*o*w*w** *w****w***w* R PRISON INDUSTRY AUTHORITY FLAGS/STOCK 07338 $422.43 01030 001-400-1208-4305 00524 4738.85 03/08/88 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES **w VENDOR TOTAL ******** **w*w*www**ww********ww******w*****ww***w****w** R RADIO SHACK MISC CROS/JUNE 88 $738.85 01429 110-400-3302-4305 00429 445.24 06/30/88 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************ww*****www****w********************w*** R RADIOCALL CORPORATION PAGING SERV/JUL 88 R RADIOCALL CORPORATION PAOINO SERV/JUL 88 www VENDOR TOTAL 00102 001-400-2101-4307 00141 46718 07/01/88 00102 001-400-2401-4201 00181 46718 07/01/88 POLICE ANIMAL CONTROL $45.24 $70.00 /RADIO MAINTENANCE 410. 00 /CONTRACT SERV ICE/PR I VAT 480. 00 15807 06359 26982 40.00 07/07/88 15825 06358 26982 40.00 07/07/88 1007338 04328 26983 40.00 07/07/08 00635 26984 40.00 07/07/88 46718 00026 26985 40.00 07/07/88 46718 00026 26985 40.00 07/07/88 R RNRB SYSTEMS 00300 001-400-1208-4305 00525 42.000.00 10596518 06158 RESRT P08T`AOE METER 96518 06/28/80 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 40.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************** 42.000.00 R MARTHA*ROBERTS C I1 Ci - PASIO NT REFUmb 36933 02327 110-300-0000-3302 06/23/88 21929 428.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING *w* VENDOR TOTAL***wwww*w*****w********************* 428. 00 R ROYAL TRUCK BODY AN CONT TRUCK BODY PARTS 26813 01805 001-400-2401-5400 00005 41.208.78 06/15/88 ANIMAL CONTROL /EQUIPMENT 26986 07/07/88 736933 06253 26987 40.00 07/07/88 26813 06109 26988 40.00 07/07/88 FINANCE-8FA340 TII'B 17;84:03_ _ PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION - '7CITV OF NERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/12/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL swwwwwa **********************N ****** R SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY STREET SIGNS • PAGE 0019 DATE 07/07/88 INV/REF PO * CHK 0 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1, 208. 78 00021 115-400-3104-4309 00576 $2.311.90 30746 06/10/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL 4************************ ************************ .1 R JUAN*SALVATIERRA CITE PMT REFUND *2.311.90 02340 110-300-0000-3302 21933 $41.00 95026 06/23/88 /COURT FINES/PARKING ***VENDOR TOTAL ****** ** 4 R SAN DIEGO FIRE EQUIPMENT CO SALVAGE COVERS/FIRE 38695 I *** VENDOR TOTAL I 00937 001-400-2201-4309 06/23/88 FIRE *41.00 00475 *234.30 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *s****s* *234. 30 R SATURN MFG CORPORATION 02326 001-400-4202-4305 00299 *388.00 OFC PARTITION/PUB WKS 22249 06128/88 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *s* VENDOR TOTAL***************************************s**************************** *388.00 0 R SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANY TOOLS/FIRE DEPT 4 *** VENDOR TOTAL***s*****►****************************** ************ 01046 001-400-2201-4309 06/17/88 FIRE 00472 *1.384.06 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS " R SECURITY PACIFIC CREDIT CORP. • LEASE PMT/JULY 09 R SECURITY PACIFIC CREDIT CORP. LEASE PMT/JULY 88 SECURITY PACIFIC CREDIT CORP. LEASE'PMT7JULY 88 . ._ 00601 001-400-1201-6900 00083 07/01/88 CITY MAfAOER 00601 001-400-2101-6900 00301 07/01/88 POLICE 00601 110-400-3302-6900 00085 07/01/88 PARKING ENF $1. 384. 06 *209.72 /LEASE PAYMENTS *837.72 /LEASE PAYMENTS *209.43 /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL. *****s $1. 256. 87 R SELF INSURERS SERVICE. INC. BAL DUE/MAY WORK CORP 11218 30746 05780 26989 *0.00 07/07/88 595026 06252 26990 *0.00 07/07/88 238695 05328 26991 *0.00 07/07/88 22249 06441 26992 *0.00 07/07/88 05332 26993 $0.00 07/07/88 00043 26994 *0.00 07/07/08 00043 26994 $0.00 07/07/88 00043 26994 *0.00 07/07/88 00824 705-400-1217-4182 00061 *711.82 11218 05855 06/10/88 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR *0.00 26995 07/07/88 r• 0 FIN t E.0RA04 ' ' T 1 . I7.54.0¢, PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 410. 4 4 'I P1OBA' BEACH ?Yi : DEMAND LIST L..,FOR . 07/12/88 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INN; ... PROD * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0020 DATE 07/07/08 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R SELF INSURERS SERVICE. INC. 00824 709-400-1217-4183 00048 *496.97 BAL DUE/MAY WORK COMP 11218 06/10/88 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP PRIOR YR ••• VENOOR TOTAL •••* •••••••••••••••••••••••• *1.208.79 R MARTHA*OHAW CITE PMT REFUND 02341 110-300-0000-3302 15894 06/23/88 21934 *43.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING •** VENDOR TOTAL***********••••u•••••••••M••******••****IH •w••••••M••••••••w•••••••• R CA88ANDRAMBHOLL CITE PMT REFUND 02339 110-300-0000-3302 33872 06/23/88 *43. 00 21932 *18.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING ••• VENDOR TOTAL o•.••••••••s••••••••••••••••s••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• R SHOOP & LUTHER. INC. ST SWEEPER OIL *18. 00 02310 001-400-3103-4311 00366 *240.41 10657 06/23/88 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE ••• VENDOR TOTAL••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••wHi•••••••••••••••• R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. MISC CHCS/JUNE 88 *240. 41 01399 001-400-4204-4309 00974 *82.36 06/30/88 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ••• VENDOR TOTAL•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• R SIR SPEEDY PRINTING TEMP PARKING PERMITS 6840 R SIR SPEEDY PRINTING TOW -AWAY CARDS/PARKING 6613 01474 110-400-3302-4305 00432 06/16/88 PARKING ENF 01474 110-400-3302-4305 00433 09/12/88 PARKING ENF *82. 36 *89. 83 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *341. 46 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL. •w•••s••••••••••*HMHH*****•••••••••• R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY liiBZ` CN 'TAINC Ol - R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY MISC CHG8/JUNE 88 00114 001-400-1101-4305 00181 06/30/88 CITY COUNCIL 00114 001-400-2201-4309 00471 06/30/88 FIRE *431.29 *31. 21 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $80.85 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 11218 05855 26995 *0.00 07/07/88 419894 06249 26996 *0.00 07/07/88 733872 06251 26997 *0.00 07/07/08 10657 06450 26998 *0.00 07/07/88 00638 26999 *0.00 07/07/88 6840 06144 27000 *0.00 07/07/88 6613 06114 27000 *0.00 07/07/88 00639 27001 *0.00 07/07/88 00639 27001 *0.00 07/07/88 FINANCE -9A340 • TIME 17:54:02 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY MISC CHOS/JUNE 88 w1�'' bFcF ERNO2A BEACH —. DEMAND LIST FOR 07/12/88 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT DATE INVC _ PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0021 DATE 07/07/88 INV/REF PO * CHK 0 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00114 001-400-4204-4309 00976 $9.41 06/30/88 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS www VENDOR TOTAL w ►N►wawwnwwow ►wwwsn*+►r ► ►**www**» ►nN►w►sr*ow*+►*****r*waww**wwwaw►wr*w R SO BAY REO PUB COMM AUTHORITY LEASE PMT/AUG 88 1848 R 80 BAY REO PUB COMM AUTHORITY LEASE PMT/AUG 88 1848 www VENDOR TOTAL 00112 001-400-2101-4251 07/01/88 POLICE 00112 001-400-2201-4251 07/01/88 FIRE 00212 00033 $121.47 00639 27001 $0.00 07/07/88 $22.640.00 1848 00040 27002 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 07/07/88 $5.660.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT R SO BAY RESERVE COORDINATORS TRAINING EXP/12 OFFICERS $28. 300. 00 02342 001-400-2101-4316 00246 $90.00 06/22/88 POLICE /TRAINING VENDOR TOTAL www w *90. 00 R SO CAL. ASSOCIATION OF GOUTS CITY DOEE/FY.56-89 __ *am VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwi1wwwww wwwwwwwwwwwwwww 00343 001-400-1101-4315 00060 $658.00 07/01/88 • CITY COUNCIL /MEMBERSHIP R 80 CAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORP. ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLE 44411 R 80 CAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORP. MYERS CANS/ST LITES 44412 02191 001-400-4204-4309 00981 06/20/88 BLDG MAINT 02191 105-400-8201-4201 00043 06/20/88 CIP 85-201 $658. 00 1848 00040 27002 $0.00 07/07/88 06363 27003 $0.00 07/07/88 06601 27004 $0.00 07/07/88 $106.50 44411 06423 27005 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 07/07/88 01.516.56 44412 06414 27005 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/07/88 *** VENDOR TOTALwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww $1.623.06 R 80 CAL PERSONNEL MONT ASSOC DUES/R. BLACKWOOD 01600 001-400-1203-4315 00024 025.00 07/01/88 PERSONNEL /MEMBERSHIP ww VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww R 80 CAL PUB LABOR REL COUNCIL - DUES/R. SLACKED _ $25. 00 00117 001-400-1203-4315 00025 $350.00 07/01/88 PERSONNEL /MEMBERSHIP 05856 27006 $0.00 07/07/88 05852 27007 $0.00 07/07/08 410 e e • 17:54.0© • PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 0 t NIERMOSA BEACH <<.W1D LIST POR 07/12/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0022 DATE 07/07/88 1 INV/REF PO * CHK * 1 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ••• VENDOR TOTAL •••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 4350.00 0 R SOURISSEAU SECURITY SYS, INC. 02075 ' 001-400-2101-4201 00267 4210.00 1103/1104 06367 27008 BACKORND INVESTIGATIONS /1104 06/15/88 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00 07/07/88 IP ••• VENDOR TOTAL •••••••••• 4210.00 • • • • •. • • R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 110-300-0000-3302 21935 418.870.00 06257 27009 CITE BURCHAROE/.M!E 8S 06/30/88' /COURT FINES/PARKING 40.00 07/07/80 ••• WHOM TOTAL •••••••• ••••••••••+w•• 418.870.00 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00400 110-300-0000-3302 21936 490.00 06161 27010 COURT DATE BAIL 06/30/88 /COURT FINES/PARKING ••• VENDOR TOTAL wow*..********e** ewlI* **14* ie**.*,.,*..N *e. *,* *****o $90.00 40.00 07/07/88 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS 00018 _ 001-400-2201-4309 00470 414.91 00642 27011 MI8C CHOB/.JUNE 88 06/30/88 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 40.00 07/07/88 ••• VENDOR TOTAL •••••••••w•• •••• 414.91 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00239 4366.35 00658 27012 OAS BILLS/.AMI 88 06/30/88 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES ••• VENDOR TOTAL •••••••** * *•w••••••****r••+I•••.•••••w•••w••M•••••••••••••••••• 4366.35 40.00 07/07/89 STARLITE-BLINKERLITE SUPPLY 00546 001-400-3103-4309 00659 4426.00 91843 06420 27013 8AFEIY dONLB 91843 06/20/08 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 40.00 07/07/88 R BTARLITE-BLINKERLITE SUPPLY 00546 105-400-2601-4309 00361 4426.00 91843 06420 27013 SAFETY CONES 91843 06/20/88 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 40.00 07/07/88 R STARLITE-BLINKERLITE SUPPLY 00546 115-400-3104-4309 00575 4852.00 91843 06420 27013 BATd CONES- 91843 06/20/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 40.00 07/07/88 ••• VENDOR TOTAL •••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••••w•••••••••••••• 41.704.00 R STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS 02325 001-400-2101-4251 00211 4564.09 REPAY UNEXPENDED FUNDS 86-87 06/29/88 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 40.00 07/07/88 86-87 05519 27014 • 1 1 1 • 11, • FINANCE-SFA340 T1 17: S4: Oft_ PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION .771UVV1We IERlb8A DEMAND LIST FOR_,07/12/88 H VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ***M**** **INF** ******#*****4.* R STATE FARM MUT. AUTO INS CO. 02328 001-300-0000-3840 REIMS AMS TRANSPORT FEE 57364 06/21/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************INF****** PAGE 0093 .. _ DATE 07/07/89 INV/REF PON CHK 0 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *564. 09 00176 *105.00 /AMBULANCE TRANSPORT *105. 00 57364 05347 27015 *0.00 07/07/8 R STATE OF CALIFORNIA 00364 001-400-2101-4251 00210 *82.50 858239 00023 27016 FINGERPRINT SERV/NAVIN 58239 06/10/8 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *0.00 07/07/8 *** VENDOR TOTAL *II****** ******INF ************** *82.50 R TOM*THOMPSON MEALS/DARE CONFERENCE 01009 001-400-2101-4317 07/06/8 POLICE 00093 *14.50 /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL **s***** **************************** R TRIAD DESIGN ASSOCIATES. INC. PUBLIC NOTICING 6486 R TRIAD DESIGN ASSOCIATES. INC. PUBLIC NOTICING 6441 R TRIAD DESIGN ASSOCIATES. INC. PUBLIC NOTICING 6451 02235 001-400-4101-4305 00211 06/21/88 PLANNING 02235 001-400-4101-4305 00212 04/30/8 PLANNING 02235 001-400-4101-4305 00213 05/11/88 PLANNING *14. 50 *128.92 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *687. 50 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *484. 75 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL **************M►********.*oo w*******************►**** *1.301.17 R J. G. *TUCKER & SON. INC. 00717 160-400-3102-4309 00291 *426. 24 ANNUAL INSPECTION 60700 06/29/89 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL ********** *426.24 R U. 8. MARKETING DISTRIBUTORS RAT POISON 35758 00127 160-400-3102-4309 00290 *114.81 06/21/8 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************r*******w** **+r********u** *114.81 V & V MANUFACTURING EMPLOYEE SERVICE PINS 01938 001-400-1203-4201 00330 *2.577.57 7516 06/30/8 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 05616 27017 *0.00 07/07/8 6486 06016 27018 *0.00 07/07/88 6441 06005 27018 *0.00 07/07/88 6451 06015 27018 *0.00 07/07/8 60700 06435 27019 *0.00 07/07/88 35758 05790 27020 *0.00 07/07/88 7516 04405 27021 *0.00 07/07/8 • • • • • • • • • • • • • FINANC6-11FA340 'TU„ 17: 04: 03 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION dITY OF FERMOS BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/12/69 VOID N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION www VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwwwwww PAGE 0024 DATE 07/07/99 INV/REF PO 0 CHK • AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $2, 577. 57 R WEST BASIN WATER A880CIATION 00371 001-400-1101-4315 00061 *100.00 CITY DUES/FY 88-89 07/01/88 CITY COUNCIL /MEMBERSHIP www VENDOR TOTAL *www wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww *100.00 04099 27022 *0.00 07/07/88 R WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY 00141 001-400-1131-4201 00388 *22.80 652-893-746 04543 PUBLICATIONS 3-746 06/03/88 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 www VENDOR TOTAL •www wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww *22.80 R WHEREHOUSE ENTERTAINMENT INC. 01743 001-400-4202-4305 00300 *118.11 FLOPPY DISKS/PUB WKS 13212 06/10/88 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES '.* VENDOR TOTAL wwwwww wwwwwwwwwwww wwwwww *118.11 R SALLY A. •WHITE 00140 001-400-4102-4201 00158 *314.50 SEC SERV/JUNE 21-08 06/27/88 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERV ICE/PR IVAT www VENDOR TOTALwwwwnwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww4wwwwww wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww *314.50 R STEVE*WIBNIEWBKI MON -EXP/MAR-JUN .80 01364 001-400-2101-4316 00247 *27.00 06/28/88 POLICE /TRAINING www VENDS TOTAL •www wwwwwwwwwwwawwwwwwwwwwwwwwww R JERRY*WITT & SONS COMF1" CENTER IMF HEADERS *27. 00 02319 001-400-4204-4309 00977 *106.50 06/21/88 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS www VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww R XEROX CORPORATION TONER/FIRE DEPT COPIER 59290 06/20/88 FIRE 00135 001-400-2201-4305 00192 *106. 50 27023 07/07/85 13212 05788 27024 *0.00 07/07/88 06017 *0. 00 06369 *0.00 06454 *O. 00 *159.75 135259290 05339 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *0.00 www VENDOR TOTAL wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww www PAY CODE TOTAL _wwwwwwwwwwwwaw*wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww *** TOTAL. WARRANTS *****wwwwwww wwwwww *159. 75 many comp/ now THE THE WARRANTS USTED ON P $427.054.09 F WARRANT REGISTER FO Ate *429.755.78 OA iii r 27025 07/07/88 27026 07/07/88 27027 07/07/88 27028 07/07/88 • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • covamb re OVINE ARE AccuRAII LABS FOR PA ENT. TREMOR • Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council June 23, 1988 For the Meeting of July 12, 1988 CANCELLATION OF WARRANTS Please Consider the following request for cancellation of the warrants listed below. #026258 - Rancho Santiago Community College - $3.50. Account Number 001-400-2101-4312. Warrant was misplaced. #026263 - Officer David Rickey - $21.75. Account Number 001-400- 2101-4312. Warrant was misplaced. #026394 - S.F. Airport Hilton - $177.12. Account Number 001-400- 1101-4317. Warrant was lost by attendee. #026332 - Robert Graham - $50.00 - Account Number 001-210-0000- 2110. Payment requested in error. #026468 - Cal Poly Kellogg Unit Found. - $529.11. Account Number 001-400-2101-4313. Class cancelled. #026164 - Dennis Allen - $146.25. Account Number 001-400-2101- 4312. Officer Allen did not attend training. #026253 - PMW Associates - $199.00. Account Number 001-400-2101- 4312. Officer Allen did not attend training. #026579 - Ofcr Timothy R. Turek - $7.25. Account Number 001-400- 2101-4312. Did not attend class. #026417 - Ofcr r. Saldana - $7.25. Account Number 001-400-2101- 4312. Did not attend class. #025614 - Embassy Suite Hotel - $212.00. Account Number 001-400- 2101-4312. Class cancelled. #025588 - State of Calif. Office of Emergency Services - $525.00. Account Number 001-400-2101-4312. Class cancelled. #025635 - Ofcr Lance Jaakola - $59.75. Account Number 001-400- 2101-4312. Class cancelled. #025610 - Ofcr Tom Eckert - $59.75. Account Number 001-400-3202- 4312. Class cancelled. 1025606 - Ofcr Michele Derks - $59.75. Account Number 001-400- 2101-4312. Class cancelled. 1025613 - Embassy Suite Hotel - $212.00. 2101-4312. Class cancelled. 1025612 - Embassy Suite Hotel - $212.00. 2101-4312. Class cancelled. 1025662 - Papa Jax Catering - $171.00. 2101-4312. Class cancelled. Concur: evin orth-raft City Manager Account Number 001 -400 - Account Number 001 -400 - Account Number 001-400- r.... „. Gary Brut/Sch City Treasurer Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council July 7, 1988 City Council Meeting of July 12, 1988 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Responsible Agent July 26, 1988 Consent Calendar Monthly Finance reports on expendi- tures & revenues - June, 1988 Finance Administrator City Treasurer's Report - June, 1988 City Treasurer RTD request for increase level of Prop A subsidies for bus passes Planning Director End of year adjustments Finance Administrator Resolution re. stop signs. Also safe route to school signing and striping Public Works Director Commercial outdoor dining encroachments Public Works Director Music Plus CUP Planning Director Ordinances & Resolutions Ordinance amending Section 21-16.1(b) Unclaimed Property to conform to Civil Code. City Attorney Resolutions calling election and requesting consolidation for all measures City Clerk Resolutions re. arguments, authors, and rebuttals City Clerk Public Hearings Reconsideration of caretaker unit in Manufacturing Zone Planning Director Appeal decision of Planning Comm. merging lots 2,3,4, Dale Tract Planning Director - 1 1 c August 9, 1988 Monthly Investment Report - July Authorization to hire consultant for CDBG grant application City Treasurer Planning Director e**************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Report from temporary subcommittee on water quality Additional report on tennis court operations at Community Center Report on problems with campaign contribution ordinance. Recreational Vehicle ordinance Development of design standards and criteria by which to review projects for EIRS Acceptance of work and final estimate for replacement of sani- tary sewers Target Area I (J&J). Results of SCAG Santa Monica Bay Pollution Symposium Report on results of noise ordi- nance study Uniform Fire Code Fire Sprinkler Ordinance Ordinance amending provision against selling gasoline and alcohol at same location City Manager Comm. Resources Director City Clerk General Services Director Planning Director Public Works Director Planning Director Public Safety Director Public Safety Director Public Safety Director City Attorney ***************************************************************** June 29, 1988 City Council Meeting July 12, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council INVESTMENTS - HERMOSA BEACH IDLE FUNDS Recommendation To authorize the City Treasurer to invest Hermosa Beach idle funds in certificates of deposit sold by banks with a five (5%) percent net worth ratio or better. Background Historically, a three (3%) percent net asset value would indicate solvency. However, given the present financial climate, I am more comfortable with a five (5%) percent net asset value (net worth ratio). A financial institution could slip from a three (3%) percent base to something less more quickly than we could react to remove our investment. With five (5%) percent net asset value, we would have necessary reaction time to remove our funds. GARY L. BR NOTED: AP-14#°,-- EVIB.ity Manager ty Treasurer A Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council July 6, 1988 City Council Meeting of June 12, 1988 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE pakac._DEP ITS _ FQ8JABWM . @EACIi Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of June 1988. Respectfully submitted, ary Brut- h City Treasurer NOTED: City Manager to INVESTMENT REPORT - JUNE 1988 INSTITUTION.: _TOTAL_ _...,___ __ DATEAF._INYESTMENT_ ________DATE QF_MATVRITY _ .._ INTERESI LAIE BALANCE 5/31/88 $4,120,000.00 Withdrawal (250,000.00) 6/16/88 Withdrawal (300,000.00) 6/19/88 Balance 6/30/88 $3,570,000.00 8.05% c9Unty_Savingl Dank Investment $ 100,000.00 12/23/87 1/6/89 8.375% Farmgrs ,,Savings Investment $ 99,000.00 3/23/88 10/3/88 7.75% California. Feileral_S_4_I. Investment $ 100,000.00 12/28/87 6/31/88 8.15% Firat_ C_ alifOrnia,.Ftd..$_4_4 Investment $ 99,000.00 1/6/88 1/6/89 9.0% 4ong,_ Bgaeh_ $_ 4 _4 Investment $ 100,000.00 1/6/88 1/6/89 8.5% $r04g4. de..S I 1, Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.5% Oa2..4141€r.1an_ aYini Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.75% Perpetga1 $aTings Investment $ 99,000.00 Peei_fj0_.$aviDgs_DanL Investment $ 99,000.00 $eYgry. 011l. $_ &j, Investment $ 99,000.00 Eounders. Investment $ 99,000.00 tftAtwo2d *Ac L Investment $ 99,000.00 Investment $ 99,000.00 2olden._Gate_ .$a,nk Investment $ 99,000.00 Investment $ 99,000.00 cOlum12 a_ $ Investment $ 99,000.00 Wt3ttrn_Federal Investment $ 400,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.75% 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.85% 1/15/88 1/17/89 9.15% 2/4/88 2/3/89 8.625% 2/5/88 2/3/89 8.50% 2/18/88 2/22/89 8.20% 2/24/88 2/23/89 8.0% 2/25/88 2/24/89 7.85% 3/3/88 2/27/89 7.4% 3/31/88 3/17/89 7.75% prd_ Mor .0red it_ 0. Investment $ 500,000.00 erri11 Investment $ 500,000.00 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Investment $ 248,733.64 Investment $ 249,320.88 TOTAL BALANCE $Z,Q55,054.52 Respectfully Submitted, /24 __7?ftazzV._ Gary Brut oh City Tre surer 5/19/88 6/30/88 3/26/87 5/26/87 5/20/93 9.10% 1/2/90 8.35% 3/1/17 8/2/16 8.0% 9.50% July 6, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council July 12, 1988 CONTRACT BETWEEN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND MARK BRIGGS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended City Council approve the attached contract and authorize the Mayor to sign on behalf of the City. BACKGROUND At the Council meeting of May 24, 1988, the City Council approved an appropriation of $7,000 for State Park Grant Fund Closeout Assistance. A copy of that agenda item is attached. ANALYSIS As you will note, the company cannot guarantee that the entire project can be completed for the figure of $7,000. Their high quote was $9,500. It is important to realize there are many unknowns with this project. As there are 10 grants to close out, some will be a simple process of pulling files together and others will involve quite a bit more time in actually reconstructing files. Staff feels the majority, if not all of the work can be completed for $7,000. Should it appear that figure is insufficient, staff must return to the Council for approval of an additional appropriation. Staff has contacted several other firms regarding this project, the majority of which do not do this type of work. The only other quote we were able to receive was $15,000 for services rendered, given the unknowns of the project. Respectfully submitted Alana M. Mastrian Assistant City Manager if May 3, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council May 10, 1988 STATE GRANTS RECONCILIATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended City Council appropriate $7,000 from Prospective Expenditures into the City Manager's Budget to cover Professional Services costs to reconcile State Recreation Grants. BACKGROUND The City has been receiving grant funding from the State for many years. The City was contacted several months ago by the State indicating several of the grants are still active and have not been properly closed out. ANALYSIS After some preliminary research of City files, it is not possible for present staff to reconcile grants that date back to the late 70's. Many files will have to be reconstructed. At first blush, it appears, not only were projects completed, but it appears the City has expended funds that should/could be reimbursed by the State. Reimbursement will occur only after all proper documentation is submitted and approved. In discussing these grants with the City's representative in the State Department of Parks and Recreation, it is their considered opinion, the City may be eligible for reimbursements in the range of approximately $50,000 to $100,000. We don't want to give the City Council false hope with those figures, but it does appear reimbursements are definitely in order, the exact amount yet to be determined. Additionally, some grants still have monies that the City can expend on already approved projects. The State has indicated they may not look favorably upon the City for new grant applications until the present ones are reconciled. Respectfully submitted, Alana M. Mastrian Assistant City Manager Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager June 17, 1988 Ms. Alana Mastrian Assistant City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 RE: State Park Grant Fund Closeout Assistance Dear Ms. Mastrian: This letter agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc., when countersigned by the City, authorizes Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc., to perform the services setforth in the Exhibit 1, Work Program, related to the closeout of nine (9) State Park Grant funded projects. The services to be performed under the Work Program shall be done on a time and materials basis for an amount not to exceed Seven Thousand Dollars ($7,000). The services will be billed in arrears at the end of the month based on the following billing rates: Principal I $119 per hour Principal II $103 per hour Secretary $ 33 per hour It is understood that Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc., does not guarantee that all of the nine projects can be completed for the stated fee. The consultant and City staff will prioritize the project after the initial investigative file review is completed. The consultant work will proceed on a good faith -best efforts to complete the project closeout in thier priority order. APPROVED CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MARK BRIGGS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BY: BY: TITLE: TITLE; DATE: DATE: Marketl7/61788 MARK BRIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 505 N. Tustin Avenue, Suite 282, Santa Ana, California 92705 (714) 550-0390 WORK PROGRAM 1. Examine the files pertaining to the nine projects 'to determine the material needed to complete the closeout documentation. 2. Meet with the Finance and Public Works Departments to gather documentation on payments on contracts for work on the projects and documentation regrading contracts, progress reports and/or completion reports. 3. Meet with fomer Hermosa Beach employees who may have information about projects where no documentation is available in the current City files. 4. Prepare correspondence to the State Department of Parks and Recreation on the schedule for completing the project closeouts and/or explaining the problems with providing documentation for certain projects. 5. Prepare the reports to the State and appropriate payment request forms and documentation for submittal. 6. Follow-up with the State personnel by telephone or meetings if the State personnel comes to the City. 7. Provide the City with a final status on each project when all avenues have been exhausted to meet the State requirements. Marketl7/61788 • June 17, 1988 Ms. Alana Mastrian Assistant City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 RE: State Park Grant Fund Closeout Assistance Dear Ms. Mastrian: This letter agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc., when countersigned by the City, authorizes Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc., to perform the services setforth in the Exhibit 1, Work Program, related to the closeout of nine (9) State Park Grant funded projects. The services to be performed under the Work Program shall be done on a time and materials basis for an amount not to exceed Seven Thousand Dollars ($7,000). The services will be billed in arrears at the end of the month based on the following billing rates: Principal I $119 per hour Principal II $103 per hour Secretary $ 33 per hour It is understood that Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc., does not guarantee that all of the nine projects can be completed for the stated fee. The consultant and City staff will prioritize the project after the initial investigative file review is completed. The consultant work will proceed on a good faith -best efforts to complete the project closeout in thier priority order. APPROVED CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAR BRIGGS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BY: BY:, TITLE: TITLE: DATE: DATE: 47/ 41 Marketl7/61788 MARK BRIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 505 N. Tustin Avenue, Suite 282, Santa Ana, Califomia 92705 (714) 550-0390 WORK PROGRAM 1. Examine the files pertaining to the nine projects .to determine the material needed to complete the closeout documentation. 2. Meet with the Finance and Public Works Departments to gather documentation on payments on contracts for work on the projects and documentation regrading contracts, progress reports and/or completion reports. 3. Meet with fomer Hermosa Beach employees who may have information about projects where no documentation is available in the current City files. 4. Prepare correspondence to the State Department of Parks and Recreation on the schedule for completing the project closeouts and/or explaining the problems with providing documentation for certain projects. 5. Prepare the reports to the State and appropriate payment request forms and documentation for submittal. 6. Follow-up with the State personnel by telephone or meetings if the State personnel comes to the City. 7. Provide the City with a final status on each project when all avenues have been exhausted to meet the State requirements. Marketl7/61788 •T June 17, 1988 Ms. Alana Mastrian Assistant City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 RE: State Park Grant Fund Closeout Assistance Dear Ms. Mastrian: This letter agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc., when countersigned by the City, authorizes Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc., to perform the services setforth in the Exhibit 1, Work Program, related to the closeout of nine (9) State Park Grant funded projects. The services to be performed under the Work Program shall be done on a time and materials basis for an amount not to exceed Seven Thousand Dollars ($7,000). The services will be billed in arrears at the end of the month based on the following billing rates: Principal I $119 per hour Principal II $103 per hour Secretary $ 33 per hour It is understood that Mark Briggs and Associates, Inc., does not guarantee that all of the nine projects can be completed for the stated fee. The consultant and City staff will prioritize the project after the initial investigative file review is completed. The consultant work will proceed on a good faith -best efforts to complete the project closeout in thier priority order. APPROVED CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MARK BRIGGS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BY: BY: TITLE: TITLE: DATE: DATE: Marketl7/61788 MARK BRIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 505 N. Tustin Avenue, Suite 282, Santa Ana, Califomia 92705 (714) 550-0390 WORK PROGRAM 1. Examine the files pertaining to the nine projects to. determine the material needed to complete the closeout documentation. 2. Meet with the Finance and Public Works Departments to gather documentation on payments on contracts for work on the projects and documentation regrading contracts, progress reports and/or completion reports. 3. Meet with fomer Hermosa Beach employees who may have information about projects where no documentation is available in the current City files. 4. Prepare correspondence to the State Department of Parks and Recreation on the schedule for completing the project closeouts and/or explaining the problems with providing documentation for certain projects. 5. Prepare the reports to the State and appropriate payment request forms and documentation for submittal. 6. Follow-up with the State personnel by telephone or meetings if the State personnel comes to the City. 7. Provide the City with a final status on each project when all avenues have been exhausted to meet the State requirements. Market17/61788 July 6, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council July 12, 1988 CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND BOB PRITCHARD INTERNATIONAL MARKETING, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended City Council approve the attached contract and authorize the mayor to sign on behalf of the City. BACKGROUND At the Council meeting of January 26, 1988, City Council approved a Pro Beach Volleyball Tournament Policy. That policy was developed to address both the Council's and resident's concerns regarding large gatherings on the beach for this type of activity. Once the policy was adopted Council directed staff to negotiate all contracts per the policy. ANALYSIS The contract before you this evening adheres to the adopted policy of January, 1988. The contract is before you this evening, as the City Council must approve all City contracts. As a point of information, staff has attached a schedule of both the amateur and professional volleyball tournaments scheduled for Hermosa Beach this summer. Concur: Kevin City Manage or craft 1 Respectfully submitted, Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources OMB lg VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENTS 1988 AMATUER VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENTS: May.21-22 r June 11-12 Aug. 6-7 11 Men's A Men's Master Women's Open CBVA CBVA CBVA PRO VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENTS: July 23-24 Women's Pritchard Sept. 24-25 Men's AVP AGREEMENT This agreement is entered into on , 1988, at Hermosa Beach, California, by and between Bob Pritchard International Marketing, Inc., a Sporting Events Promoter (BPIM), and the City of Hermosa Beach (CITY), with regard to the following facts: A) BPIM is a promotion company which promotes sporting events. B) CITY administers beach programs in Hermosa Beach, California and annually stages beach volleyball tournaments. C) BPIM and CITY are desirous of entering into a relationship with regard to the 1988 California Open Women's Professional Beach Volleyball Tournament. THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: 1) BPIM will pay to CITY a fee of $3,000 for use of the beach volleyball courts located at the Hermosa Beach Pier, July 23 & 24, 1988. 2) BPIM agrees to provide a professonal cleaning service to clean up around tournament site both Saturday and Sunday. Area to be specified by CITY. 3) BPIM will pay the cost of Police Officers to supervise the event both days; the Chief of Police or his designate will mandate the number of officers and hours worked. In the event of an emergency or other situation arising from a volleyball related activity which necessitates additional security, BPIM is responsible for the additional costs incurred. Said costs to be paid no later than two weeks after tournament. 4) BPIM will supply a professional security force of their own, minimum of six at any one time to supervise the crowd and alert all present to the "Open Container" Ordinance of the City. All such personnel shall be wearing identifiable t -shirts and shall be a seperate staff from tournament personnel. 5) BPIM will provide the CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing liability insurance naming the CITY, its officers, employees and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage. 1 Agreement Page Two BPIM agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent of wrongful act or omission of BPIM, its agents, officers and employees, including,but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. 6) BPIM will guarantee a minimum announced purse of $10,000. In no event is the CITY liable for the prize money. 7) All P.O.P. materials (i.e. event posters) produced will mention the event and all posters, counter cards and tour schedules will mention the competition site. 8) Adequate funds will be committed by BPIM and its sponsors to advertise the event. The CITY shall assume no advertising obligation. 9) BPIM shall be permitted to sell official Pro Volleyball concession items at no more than one concession booth at the tournament site. 10) No food or beverage concessions are permitted. 11) CITY shall be notified no later than July 15, 1988, of any co-sponsors supporting the Tournament. Each co-sponsor shall pay the CITY a fee of $100. Said fees to be paid by BPIM prior to the tournament. The CITY shall have final approval of all co-sponsors and of the primary tournament sponsor. Co-sponsors shall be permitted to display their products at no more than one concession booth each. CITY and BPIM will mutually agree to display areas. 12) BPIM shall provide portable audio system capable of reaching primary spectator area. 13) CITY shall permit BPIM to place two event banners announcing the tournament over major thoroughfares, at mutually agreed upon locations, for the period of two weeks preceding the event. Installation to be done by City Public Works Department and cost to be borne by BPIM. 14) CITY shall request the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches to level the beach and sift the sand before 7:00 a.m. on July 23rd. Costs shallbe borne by BPIM. 2 Agreement Page Three 15) BPIM will provide up to four portable toilets at a location agreed to by both contracting parties and the L.A. County Lifeguards. 16) BPIM shall provide a leaderboard, volleyballs, nets, referees and all equipment necessary to stage the event. 17) All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc., deemed necessary by BPIM to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of BPIM. 18) That Bob Pritchard International Marketing, Inc., be required to post signs throughout the impacted area as well at major ingress roads to the CITY indicating 1) where there is free parking and 2) that the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. 19) BPIM shall have access to the Tournament site 36 hours prior to start of event. 20) CITY to contact L.A. County Lifeguards to provide power source for BPIM. 21) CITY shall block the end of Pier Avenue for BPIM staff parking and television access. BPIM will be responsible for monitoring use of this area. (Same area as in years past.) Beach Drive to Strand. BPIM will in no way block emergency vehicle access from Pier Avenue to the Strand. If BPIM fails to comply with this condition, the CITY may revoke parking privileges at any time. OVED, A CI r ATTORN ate CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Municipal Corporation, By Mayor Date BOB PRITCHARD INTERNATIONAL MARKETING, INC. BY� A_.�c�c�, (J.C.C�cY ,eDirec or of a ketin. 3 July 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of July 12, 1988 APPROVAL OF AMENDED AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES WITH KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to sign the attached First Amended Agreement for legal services with Kane, Ballmer & Berkman. Background: The attached letter received from Kane, Ballmer & Berkman reflects their new billing rates effective July 1, 1988. These rates amend rates last adjusted in August, 1986 and reflect a O% to 11% increase. This firm continues to handle certain cases dating to when they served as the City's legal representatives. No new cases have been assigned to them. Approval of the agree- ment would allow the City to call upon them for services as requested by the City Council or City Manager. ev n :. ort craft City Manager KBN/ld Attachment ik MURRAY O. KANE BRUCE O. BALLMER JAMES DEXTER CLARK GLENN F. WASSERMAN MARJORIE R. FRIEDLANDER R. BRUCE TEPPER, JR. RENEE L. CAMPBELL LANCE E. GARBER KATHRYN REIMANN PRINCIPALS ROBERT P. BERKMAN RETIRED KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN A LAW CORPORATION 354 SOUTH SPRING STREET, SUITE 420 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90013 TELEPHONE (213) 617-0480 TELECOPIER (213) 625-0931 June 6, 1988 Mr. Kevin Northcraft City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Mr. Northcraft: The City of Hermosa Beach previously entered into an Agreement for Legal Services with our firm. In August, 1986, the City and our firm last amended the Agreement. That Agreement included a schedule of billing rates for each category of attorneys. Due to increases in our costs since the Amendment, we have adjusted the prevailing billing rates charged our clients in accordance with those set forth in the enclosed "First Amended Agreement for Legal Services". 1. The proposed First Amended Agreement sets forth the following rate structure: Senior Principal Principal Senior Associate Associate Redevelopment Specialist Legal Assistant I Legal Assistant II Word Processing $150 $135 $115 $100 $100 $ 70 $ 50 $ 25 per hour per hour per hour per hour per hour per hour per hour per hour 2. All other terms and conditions would remain as set forth in the proposed Agreement. Mr. Kevin Northcraft June 6, 1988 Page 2 3. The Effective Date of the First Amended Agreement would be July 1, 1988. We respectfully request that the enclosed First Amended Agreement for Legal Services be presented to the City for its consideration at your earliest convenience. In the event this First Amended Agreement is approved, please execute the two enclosed signed originals and return one to us c/o Philip Henderson, Administrator. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me. Sincerely yours, KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN By • CSQ. cc: Mr. James Lough, City Attorney (w/o enclosures) FIRST AMENDED AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES WITH KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of , 1988, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN, a law corporation, authorized to practice law in California with principal offices in the City of Los Angeles, California (hereinafter referred to as "Special Counsel"). W I T N E S S E T Ii: WHEREAS, the City is desirous of undertaking activities necessary for the planning and execution of redevelopment projects pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law; and WHEREAS, the City desires to engage Special Counsel to render advice and assistance in connection with these undertakings in cooperation with, and in assistance to the City Attorney of the City of Hermosa Beach, and City Attorney acting as General Counsel for the City (hereinafter referred to as "General Counsel"). NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY DO MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES Special Counsel agrees to render legal services to the City when and as requested by the City and under the direction of General Counsel. Services to be performed by Special Counsel under this Agreement may include, but not be limited to, the rendering of legal advice and consultation; furnishing of written legal opinions; drafting and preparation of necessary legal documents; legal reviews and approval of contracts; drafting of redevelopment plans and legal opinions with respect to such plans; attendance at local hearings or other meetings as required; and litigation services. 2. COMPENSATION Special Counsel shall be compensated for services rendered under this Agreement in accordance with the following schedule: r Senior Principals Principals Senior Associates Associates Redevelopment Specialist Legal Assistant I Legal Assistant II Word Processing $150 per hour $135 per hour $115 per hour $100 per hour $100 per hour $ 70 per hour $ 50 per hour $ 25 per hour For travel, subsistence, and other out-of-pocket expenses authorized by the City in connection with the performance of duties under this Agreement: (a) The amount of the actual cost of transportation by common carrier or at the rate of twenty-five (25) cents per mile, if travel is performed by privately owned automobile. (b) Subsistence expenses, supported by detailed records in the amount of the actual costs. (c) Taxi fares, long distance telephone calls, and similar expenditures in the amount of actual cost. (d) Duplication costs for all copies in excess of first copy, at a cost of fifteen (15) cents per page. (e) Fees and costs incurred by counsel on engaging consultants and experts approved by you. Special Counsel shall not be reimbursed for secretarial or typist services nor for normal office operating expenses, with the exception of word processing fees as noted above. Special Counsel shall be reimbursed for actual litigation costs, fees and expenses such as filing fees, expert witness fees, charges for service of process and costs of investigation. 3. METHOD OF PAYMENT Special Counsel shall, within ten (10) days after the first of each calendar month, submit a statement containing a breakdown of services performed during the preceding month, specifying the services performed, dates and number of hours, itemization of travel, subsistence and other expenses related thereto. 4. RIGHT OF TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated at any time by either party on written notice to the other. 5. NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE IN FORM Special Counsel reserves the right to effect changes in form, including but not limited to: the change in form from a professional law corporation to a partnership; the change in form of any partner or partners from an individual or individuals to a professional law corporation; the change in form of any corporate partner or partners to individual partners. The City shall be promptly notified in writing of any change in form. 6. ADDITIONAL PARTNE S AND EMPLOYEES The addition of new partner(s) or the departure of existing partner(s) shall not effect a termination of this Agreement. Special Counsel reserves the right to add, substitute or delete partners, associates and employees in carrying out its services under this Agreement. The City shall be promptly notified in writing of any change in the constituency of the partnership. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Special Counsel have executed this Agreement as of the date first hereinabove set forth. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH By: Date: KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN By: Date: (-3-v...c.t (-442a....4., (p/e.Arr 40,• • July 5, 1988 City Council Meeting July 12, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-936 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE ATTACHED TEXT AMENDMENT TO HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE SECTION 1-7.3 "NOTICE TO APPEAR - TIME" Submitted for waiver of further reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 88-936 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of June 28, 1988, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Concur: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson None None None Ra hleen edstokke, City Clerk evin . or raft, City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88-936 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE ATTACHED TEXT AMENDMENT TO HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE SECTION 1-7.3 'NOTICE TO APPEAR -TIME' WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach desires to bring the Hermosa Beach City Code up to date with current statutory provisions; WHEREAS, Section 1-7.3 of the Hermosa Beach City Code provides that a person must appear before the court with jurisdiction or before an officer authorized to receive deposit or bail at least 5 days after an arrest for a violation of the City Code; WHEREAS, Section 1-7.3 conflicts with California Penal Code section 853.6, providing that a person appear before the court of jurisdiction or before an officer authorized to recieve deposit or bail at least 10 days following an arrest; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Chapter 1, (General Provisions), Section 1-7.3 of said City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 1-7.3. NOTICES TO APPEAR - TIME. The time specified in the notice to appear shall be at least ten (10) days after such arrest. // // 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 i JL 25 10, 2; 27 Section 2. Effective Date. That this ordinance spall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption. Section 3. Publication. Prior to the expiration of Fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city; shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF 1988. ATTEST: CITY CLERK PROVED AS 28 Y ATTORNEY PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA July 5, 1988 City Council Meeting July 12, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-937 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Area 7 from R-2 to R-28) Submitted for waiver of further reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 88-937 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of June 28, 1988, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Concur: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson None None None evin`B. Nort c aft, City Manager Ail Ka hleen Midstokke, City Clerk 2b 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - 937 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the Zoning Map shall be amended as shown on the attached maps and legally described as follows: 1. Rezone area 7 from R-2 to R -2B, legally described as follows: - Lots 1-4 inclusive of the Johnson and Newman's Camino Real Tract. - Lots 2-22 inclusive of the J. M. Floores Subdivision. - Lots 1-4 inclusive, 17-22 inclusive, portions of 15 & 16, Lots 6-13 inclusive and 24-27 inclusive of the Angela Heights Tract. - Lots 1-8 inclusive of Tract 21785. 2. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a completed building permit package on file with the City prior to June 28, 1988. Said package must include a completed building permit application form, completed conceptual plan (plot plan, floor plans, elevation plans and similar plans) and a lot survey. Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a diligent manner and must be issued a building permit within six months of the effective date of this ordinance. 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK AREA OVERVIEW Reione from Two Family Residential (R-2) to Two Family' Residential (R -2B) • (numbered areas correspond to detail maps) 18TH AREA Detail Map 1 • ST $ % 17TH ST. N L___ 17Th AREA 7 ' Detail. p 2 • ST. + • -' . . • •Ks p sA p o .III o i o K 0n,"$ o* •O /MN , '.. ''• N AREA 7 ' Detail p 3 4 I7TH s 11 S7 tU .• • cc • 4es9 /11..v O •$1irto8 /4 $4 Noll'77ir. ' QO/ `�� . 4dc4/ 14x.4i3I 97 ® AREA 7 Detail Map 4 ®Iof4. . '04r9 O 1143 oar.0 %®i 4JOI40 T % 13 4l►tete /30.96 4 SO7.47 E m • 2.210 ST. t • r,4a o July 5, 1988 City Council Meeting July 12, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-936 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE ATTACHED TEXT AMENDMENT TO HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE SECTION 1-7.3 "NOTICE TO APPEAR - TIME" Submitted for waiver of further reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 88-936 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of June 28, 1988, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Ka hleen Midstokke, City Clerk Concur: evin B. or raft, City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88-936 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE ATTACHED TEXT AMENDMENT TO HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE SECTION 1-7.3 'NOTICE TO APPEAR -TIME' WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach desires to bring the Hermosa Beach City Code up to date with current statutory provisions; WHEREAS, Section 1-7.3 of the Hermosa Beach City Code provides that a person must appear before the court with jurisdiction or before an officer authorized to receive deposit or bail at least 5 days after an arrest for a violation of the City Code; WHEREAS, Section 1-7.3 conflicts with California Penal Code section 853.6, providing that a person appear before the court of jurisdiction or before an officer authorized to recieve deposit or bail at least 10 days following an arrest; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Chapter 1, (General Provisions), Section 1-7.3 of said City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 1-7.3. NOTICES TO APPEAR - TIME. The time specified in the notice to appear shall be at least ten (10) days after such arrest. // // • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 27 28 Section 2. Effective Date. That this ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption. Section 3. Publication. Prior to the expiration of Fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city; shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF 1988. ATTEST: CITY CLERK PROVED AS ORM: Y ATTORNEY PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA -r• July 5, 1988 City Council Meeting July 12, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-938 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD "ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, GRADES K-8, C.U.P. REQUIRED" TO THE R-1 ZONE, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE, AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Submitted for waiver of further reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 88-938 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of June 28, 1988, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson None None None Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk Concur: Kevin B. N. t craft, City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - 938 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD "ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, GRADES K-8, C.U.P. REQUIRED" TO THE R-1 ZONE, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE, AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on June 28, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony on this matter and made the following Findings: A. Schools are currently allowed in the Open Space zones; B. The school district has available schools zoned unclassified which cannot currently be used for schools because unclassified areas have been defined as equivalent to R-1 zoning; C. Schools are typically found in residential areas and serve a useful purpose including open space and recreational space; D. Elementary schools may not have a detrimental effect in residential zones when appropriate conditions of approval are imposed; E. A Conditional Use Permit shall be required, tberefore, any proposed school shall be discretionary, and shall therefore, require a site specific environmental assessment; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN THE FOLLOWING TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND APPROVES AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Section 1: Amend the R-1, Single -Family Residential Zone permitted use list, Article 4, Section 4-2, to include the following in alphabetical order the following: "Elementary School, Grades K-8, Conditional Use Permit required" Section 2: This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Section 3: Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the glia Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation p-ubliebed and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 4: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance , shall enter the same in the book of original ordinance of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption therof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Location a. Address: city wide • • b. Legal: 2. Description Text amendment to zoning ordinance to add "elementary school, grades K-8, C.U.P. required" to the R-1 zone pprmittAA nate licit- 3. iar 3. Sponsor a. Name: Planning Department._ <'ity of Hermosa Reach b. Mailing Address: 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Phone: 213-376-6984 • In accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City of Hermosa beach, which im- plements the California Environmental quality Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach, the Environmental Review Committee must make an environmental review of all private projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planning Commission must make an environmental review of all public projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, which are subject to the Environmental quality Act. This declaration is documentation of the review and, if it be- comes final, no comprehensive Enviromnental Impact Report is required for this project. NEGATIVE DECLARATION a FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro- . posed project in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas- ures are included in the project, it would not ave a significant effect on the environment. Documentation supporj4ng th' inding is on file in the .Building Department. -_ r9-f98s Date of Finding Chairma viro ental Review Committee FINDING OF TH: We have undertaken and completed a ject in accordance with Resolution Beach, and find that this project mental Impact Report because, pro included in the project, it wo d vironment. Documentation s •porti ing Department. G-01/ Date of Finding act Review of this pro- f Council of Hermosa :omprehensive Environ- itigation measures are tnt effect on the en - ml file in the Build - C. -"fin, Planning C • F THE CITY COUNCIL • We have undertaken and completed an environmental Impact Review of this pro- posed project in accordance with Resolution 70-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find this project does not require a comprehensive En- vironmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas- ures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on . the environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Building Department. . bate of Finding - Mayor, Hermosa Beach City Council July 5, 1988 City Council Meeting July 12, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council AMENDMENT TO CITY CODE SECTION 8-6 CIVIL DEFENSE Re99nmendatiQn It is recommended that the City Council introduce the attached ordinance entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 8-6. CIVIL DEFENSE AND DISASTER - EMERGENCY POWER." Bacgru4 Pursuant to Book Publishing Company's report on the Hermosa Beach City Code and review by the City Attorney's office, the Council has concurred that there are several ordinances contained in the City Code that need to be amended. City Code Section 8-6. Civil Defense and Disaster- Emergency Power makes reference to the declaration of an emergency affects the exercise of public bidding requirements in State Government Code Section 37902. This statute was repealed in 1982 and replaced with Public Contract Code Section 20168. This ordinance amends the City Code changing the reference to the new statute. NOTED: N.rt ,'r= City Manager Respectfully submitted, OP4‘1.4)M4.0V%4:-) Kat leen Midstokke, City Clerk 26 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 8-6. CIVIL DEFENSE AND DISASTER - EMERGENCY POWER. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach desires t0 bring the Hermosa Beach City Code up to date with current statutory provisions; WHEREAS, Section 8.6 Of the Hermosa Beach City Code makes reference to the declaration Of an emergency affects the exercise Of public bidding requirements State Government Code, Section 37902; WHEREAS, SeetiOn 37902 Of the Government Code was repealed in 1982 and replaced with Public Contract Code Section 20168; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Agraliaala Chapter 8, Civil Defense and Disaster, Section 8-6. Same -Emergency power., NOte: of said City Code is hereby amended tO read as follows: Note: The deelaratiQn Of an emergency affects the exercise Of many city powers, duties and functions; for example: Public bidding requirements (egtlio 9 tnt k4 _zNQt. Qn_aQJ 8; Government Code Section 4410; Mi itary and Veterans Code, Section 147); the appointment of additional police Officers (Govern- ment Code Section 38631); the holding of council meetings (Government Code, Section 54954), and emergency powers to expend funds (Government Code Section 53019). SECTION_2s Ordinance NO. 76-547, Section 1, adopted January 11, 1977 is hereby amended accOrdingly. araglinala Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption. AECTIQN 4l Publication. Prior to the expiration Of Fifteen (15) days after the date Of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance t0 be published in the zayAteactet, a weekly newspaper Of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, California, in the manner provided by law. AMU/Lia That the City Clerk shall certify t0 the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book Of original ordinances Of said city; shall make minutes Of the passage and adoption thereof in the records Of the proceedings Of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF ATTEST: CITY CLERK ROVED AS ORM: AT O R N Y' , 1988. PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA BACKGROUND MATERIALS HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE 1 8-7 (e) To requisition necessary personnel or material of any city department or agency. (1) To exercise the powers conferred on him by this chapter or by resolution adopted under this chapter, powers conferred on him by statute, by agreement approved by the city council, or by other lawful authority, and in conformity with Section 38791 of the State Government Code, to exercise complete authority over the city and to exercise all police power vested in the city by con- stitution and general laws. Note: The declaration of an emergency affects the exercise of many city powers, duti = an u ; for example: Pub ' • . ' s g requiremen State , „ ent Code, Sec - ti . ' 379 ' - and 4410 ; State i 'tary and Veterans Code, 47) ; the appointment of additional police officers (State Government Code, Section 38631) ; the holding of council meetings (State Government Code, Section 54954) , and emergency powers to expend funds (State Government Code, Section 53019) . (Ord. No. 76-547, § 1, 1-11-77) Sec. 8-7. Emergency organization. All officers and employees of this city, together with those volunteer forces enrolled to aid them during an emergency, and all groups, organizations, and persons who may by agree- ment or operation of law, including persons impressed into service under the provisions of section 8-6(d) of this chapter, and thereby charged with duties incident to the protection of life and property in this city during such emergency, shall constitute the emergency organization of the city. The city council shall implement this chapter by the adop- tion of a resolution setting forth the form of organization, the assignment of functions and duties, and the agencies responsible therefor. Insofar as practicable, the form of orga- nization, titles and terminology shall conform to the recommen- dations of the emergency preparedness and disaster agencies of the federal government and the State of California. (Ord. No. 76-547, § 1, 1-11-77) Supp. No. 4-77 110 i n WOW COM oftig,iliogi•oithe titto tide article. depea1ed. 1 t *WWI that date. PI .141,1'; at iiit is the :Thiitti, 'dikes to all legisktiiiii Ism enact- . with owe mother. pre - /0#0, utitilit without an "law iesPect to OP* ficaled ape a Or „ • • • • Z•• e•44...` .<• 00111- * A.I.Fmrse eiserges for • ilmOb•!Pas• *LAI* a$ Public O It! 6• -001,01044INI 000- mn for Id. 61.4..21c tr/!, :4 rri •:. vI eirret...( eani f.4147"r • ••• leCtion 8 thUUc1e. to.t . • . e.torp alte/WM" GOMM:NT CODE 11) MU to STOW Repealed I ARTICLE IL MUSEUMS ft 37558, 37559. Repealed by Stets.1977. 4. 309, p. 1286, if 14, 18, =VW, off. July 8, 1277 ARTICLE 7. HOSPITALS MANAGED BY BOARD OF HOSPITAL TRUSTEES f 37600. Applicability Law Rade' C -- Hospital respoosibIlhy. Arthur F. Southwick (1973) 9 C.W.Lt. 429. f 37618. Bond issue Instead of the tax levy, the city legislative body may raise the necessary funds by a bond issue pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 43600) of Chapter 4 of Division 4. (Amended by Stats.1982, c. 464, p. 1867, 1 79.) ARTICLE 8. HOSPITALS MANAGED BY CITY LEGISLATIVE BODY Crags Rehreseei Public anployees' redrement system, "public agency" to • include hospital managed in accordance with this article, em 20009.1 f 37658. Donations; indebtedness tot interest The indebtedness shall be incurred and interest paid pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 43600) of Chapter 4 of Division 4. The ordinance calling the bond election shall not contain any statement as to bonds to be issued. In general terms the ordinance shall describe the proposed donation, the purpose for which itis to be used, and the terms upon which it is to be made and accepted. (Amended by State.1986, c. 106, f 66.) f 37459. Bonded indebtednesso election The city may incur a bonded indebtedness pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 48600) of Chapter 4 of Division 4, for the acquisition of real or personal property for the hospital and its Construction and equipment. The question of incurring such an indebtedness may be submitted at the election determining whether a hospital is to be established. (Amended by Stats.1985, e. 106, f 67) CHAP= 6. CONTRACTS [REPEALEDI pesr 6isoe repeakd by StatalM, 464, p. 1$14,i & pealed bj Stats.1982, c. 465, p. 1914, f 8 1 was amended by Sesta.1978, c. See, am, Pub.Con.C. 20161 to 20169. 3. and I 379122 was uncoiled by Stats.1969, c. 594, p. 1226, 1; Stats.1975, c. 916, p. 2024 i Son37903.5,37903.S. added by State.1976, G. 602,p. 1432.1 7, related to notices inviting bids, which specified locations of postible metals ff 37981 to 37935. Repealed by State.1982, c. 4415, p. 1914, 1 8 ate. now. Pab.Coa.C. if 20170 to 20174. Asterisks • • • Indicate deletions by amendment 61 CM.Colle-6. 61 10611PP L AGENCIES Div. 2 xi 1603 of the modifications 1 Game Code. ee of Identical presented and he lowest, the Is are received, 'urther comply- . 516, p.1884, § 27; '9, 4 1; Stats.1941, ta.1941, e. 1084, p. 49,p.258,§777; 1 1; Stats.1915, c. 941, e. 741, p. 2260, p. 2878, 4 2. ids; resolution resolution by a 1 can be per - or supplies on of the LOCAL AGENCY PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION § 20168 Pt. 3 resolution, it may have the project done in the manner stated without further complying with this chapter. (Added by Stats.1982, c. 465, p. 1921, § 11.) Historical Note Derivation: Gov.C. former § 37905, add- ed by Stats.1949, c. 79, p. 165, § 1. Stats.1883, c. 49, p. 274, § 874; Stats. 1891, c. 59, p. 55, § 1; Stats.1897, c. 87, p. 89, § 1; Stats.1913, c. 27, p. 32, § 1; State. 1929, c. 294, p. 598, § 3; Stats.1931, c. 131, p. 183, § 5; Stats.1933, c. 516, p. 1334, § 27; Stats.1939, c. 306, p. 1579, § 1; Stats.1941, c. 741, p. 2259, § 1; Stats.1941, c. 1034, p. 2672, § 1; Stats.1883, c. 49, p. 258, § 777; Stats.1891, c. 58, p. 54, § 1; Stats.1915, c. 663, p. 1304, § 1; Stats.1941, c. 741, p. 2260, § 2; Stats.1941, c. 1034, p. 2673, § 2. Notes of Decisions 1. In general City acted in excess of its authority when it permitted its own employees to replace service lines to water main, at total cost in excess of $3,500, without submitting such "public project" to competitive bidding. Killeen v. City of San Bruno (1976) 128 Cal.Rptr. 760, 56 C.A.3d 479. A general law city receiving federal funds under title X, Public Works and Eco- nomic Development Act of 1965, could not utilize persons employed with such funds for construction, erection, repair, remodel- ing, improvement or alteration of public fa- cilities, if total costa of a particular project exceeded the limit of $5,000 as set forth in Gov.C. § 37902 (repealed; see, now, § 20162) except as permitted by Gov.C. § 37905 (repealed; see, now, this section), Gov.C. § 53707 (repealed) and by applicable judicially created exceptions. 59 Ops.Atty. Gen. 242, 4-2-76. § 20168. Calamities or emergencies; expenditures; resolution If there is a great public calamity, as an extraordinary fire, flood, storm, epidemic, or other disaster, or if it is necessary to do emergency work to prepare for national or local defense, the legislative body may pass a resolution by a four-fifths vote of its members declaring that the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health, or property. Upon adoption of the resolution, it may expend any sum required in the emergency without complying with this chapter. (Added by Stats.1982, c. 465, p. 1921, § 11.) Historical Note Derivation: Gov.C. former § 37906, add- ed by Stats.1949, c. 79, p. 165, § 1. Stats.1883, c. 49, p. 274, § 874; Stats. 1891, c. 59, p. 55, § 1; Stats.1897, c. 87, p. 89, § 1; Stats.1913, c. 27, p. 32, § 1; Stats. 1929, c. 294, p. 598, § 3; Stats.1931, c. 131, p. 183, § 5; Stats.1933, c. 516, p. 1334, § 27; Stats.1939, c. 306, p. 1579, § 1; Stats.1941, c. 741, p. 2259, § 1; Stats.1941, c. 1034, p. 2672, § 1; Stats.1883, c. 49, p. 258, § 777; Stats.1891, c. 58, p. 54, § 1; Stats.1915, c. 663, p. 1304, § 1; Stats.1941, c. 741, p. 2260, § 2; Stats.1941, c. 1034, p. 2673, § 2. 267 July 5, 1988 City Council Meeting July 12, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council CANVASS OF BALLOTS SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION JUNE 7, 1988 ecgmme1Ida OR It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION CONSOLIDATED WITH THE PRIMARY ELECTION HELD ON JUNE 7, 1988, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY THE PROVISION OF LAW." BdokgrQp3d The results of the canvass are as shown on "Exhibit A" of the attached resolution. Measure D- 4% of Utility Users Tax to Purchase A.T. & S.F. Right -of -Way was passed, and should be deemed adopted. Respectfully submitted, Concur: evin B. Nort ft, City Manager hleen Midstokke, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION CONSOLIDATED WITH THE PRIMARY ELECTION HELD ON JUNE 7, 1988, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY THE PROVISIONS OF LAW. WHEREAS, a Special Municipal Election consolidated with the Primary Election was held and conducted in the City of Hermosa Beach, California, on Tuesday, June 7, 1988, as required by law; and WHEREAS, notice of the election was duly and regularly given in time, form and manner as provided by law; that voting pre- cincts were property established; that election officers were appointed and that in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State Of Cali- fornia for the holding Of elections in cities; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution NO. 88-5112 adopted on February 23, 1988, the Registrar -Recorder, County Of Los Angeles, canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the results tO this City Council, the results are received, attached and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That there were twenty two (22) voting precincts established for the purpose of holding said election consisting Of the regular election precincts in said City as established for holding of State and County elections. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 2. That at the Special Municipal Election, the following measure was submitted to the electors of said City: Shall of the existing 10 Utility Users Tax be limited to Railroad right-of-way purchase and expire thereafter? SECTION 3. That the whole number of ballots east in the City except absent voter ballots was 4,784. That the whole number of absent voter ballots east in the City was 499, making a total of 5,283 ballots cast. SECTION 4. That the number Of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes given in the City for and against such measure are as listed in "Exhibit A" attached. SECTION 5. The City Council does declare and determine that as a result of said election, a majority in excess of two-thirds of the qualified voters voting on such measure did determine as follows: D -4% OF UTILITY USERS TAX TO PURCHASE A.T.&S.F. RIGHT-OF-WAY That said measure was carried, and shall be deemed adopted. SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and shall enter the same in the Book of original Resolutions of said City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON the 12th day of July, 1988. P SID NT o the C ty Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: ROVED AS 'i ORM: e0.4/ KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk J -S P. LOU 40iV y Att EXHIBIT "A" STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. ) I, CHARLES WEISSBURD, Registrar -Recorder of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct Canvass of the Votes cast For and Against Proposition D at the Hermosa Beach City Special Municipal Election consolidated with the Primary Election held on June 7, 1988. I further certify that the total Ballots Cast in the Hermosa Beach City Special Municipal Election are as follows: PRECINCT BALLOTS CAST ABSENTEE BALLOTS CAST TOTAL BALLOTS CAST 4,784 499 5,283 I further certify that the total votes cast on said Proposition D are as follows: PROPOSITION D Precinct Vote Absentee Vote TOTAL VOTE YES NO 3,561 749 393 60 3,954 809 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal this 27th day of June, 1988 sNaok*\i‘k$ CHARLES WEISSBURD Registrar -Recorder County of Los Angeles HERMDSA BEACH 2750011A HE OSA BEACH 2750012A Hgom 1SA BEACH 2750013A :1E.7500:t6A HERMOSABEACH 2750017A HERMOSA BEACH 2750018A META BEACH 2750019A 112 35 12E 25 131 27 COUNTY OF LDS ANGELES PRIMARY ELECTION NONPARTISAN OFFICIAL COUNTYWIDE coLNTYWIDE BALLOTS CAST 4784 499 OWE 7. 1988 PAGE 233.2 27TH US CONGRESSIONAL ABSENTEE VOTE 29TH STATE SENATE 4784 $9 51A 51ST STATE ASSEMBLY 4784 51ST STATE ASSEMBLY 4TH SUPERVISORIAL ABSENTEE VOTE 4TH BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 4784 >iY%. i{44'•• � iii: ii;J}::: HERM OSA BEACH+ ABSENTEE VOTE Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 12, 1988 City Council Meeting of July 12, 1988 RESOLUTION TO ADOPT A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, COMMANDERS' BARGAINING UNIT RECOMMENDED ACTION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution. Background: The existing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Police Officers' Association, Commanders' Bargaining Unit, expired February 29, 1988. The City and representatives of the of the Unit have met and con- ferred toward reaching agreement on a successor MOU. that MOU is attached for Council approval. Analysis: Included in the changes negotiated in this MOU are: * Establishing a Commander classification. * Elimination of the Lieutenent and Captain Classifications * Increase of 3% in the Commander salary range effective 3/1 * Increase of 4% the second and third year * Establishing a + 7.5% Merit Pay plan * Increase in Life insurance to $50,000 * Bereavement Leave * Education/Tuition Reimbursement * Increase in uniform allowance Respectfully submit Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Noted: th Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 2f a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE HER- MOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION, COMMANDERS' BARGAINING UNIT WHEREAS, the Hermosa Beach Police Commanders have elected to meet and confer with the City of Hermosa Beach on matters con- cerning wages, hours, and working conditions; and, WHEREAS, the above personnel have selected certain indi- viduals to represent them; and, WHEREAS, Employee and Management representatives have jointly negotiated a Memorandum of Understanding which bas been ratified by a majority vote of the members of the Police Commanders' Bargaining Unit. Said Memorandum of Understanding is attached hereto as "Exhibit A".; and, WHEREAS, the employee representatives and the City Manager have signed the Memorandum of Understanding and have mutually agreed to recommend that the City Council adopt this Memorandum of Understanding; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESOLVES to enter into said Memorandum of Understanding to be dated July 12, 1988, and to be effective for the period March 1, 1988 through and including February 28, 1991. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which time same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 12th dat of July, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: Ci 13 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Clerk City Attorney MARCH 1, 1988 FEBRUARY 28, 1991 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH A FORMAL MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SETTING FORTH THE HOURS, WAGES, AND WORKING CONDITIONS FOR EMPLOYEES REPRESENTED BY THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS° ASSOCIATION. POLICE COMMANDERS BARGAINING GROUP 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE SUBJECT FAGS 1 PARTIES TO THE MEMORANDUM 2 2 RECOGNITION 2 3 SCOPE OF IMPLEMENTATION 2 4 JOB ACTION 3 5 NON-DISCRIMINATION 3 6 MANAGEMENT RIGHTS 3 7 PROVISIONS OF LAW - INSEPARABILITY 4 8 FULL UNDERSTANDING, MODIFICATION WAIVER 4 9 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 5 10 WORK SCHEDULE 5 11 COMPENSATION - METHODS OF COMPENSATION 5 12 BASE SALARY 6 13 EXEMPT EMPLOYEES 6 14 INSURANCE COVERAGES 6 15 DEFERRED COMPENSATION 7 16 SALARY CONTINUATION PLAN 7 17 RETIREMENT 7 18 LEAVE OF ABSENCE 7 19 VACATION 8 20 HOLIDAYS 8 21 SICK LEAVE 9 22 BEREAVEMENT LEAVE 10 23 MANAGEMENT LEAVE 10 24 EDUCATIONAL REIMBURSEMENT 10 25 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10 26 AMMUNITION REPLACEMENT 10 27 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MERIT PAY 11 28 DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS 11 29 LAYOFF 12 30 NO SMOKING 12 31 FURTHER STUDIES 12 32 DURATION OF CONTRACT 13 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR TEE POLICE COMMANDERS BARGAINING GROUP 1. PARTIES TO THE MEMORANDUM This Memorandum of Understanding, hereinafter referred to as the "MOU" or the "Agreement," has been entered into, pursuant to the laws of the State of California and the City of Hermosa Beach, California, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, hereinafter referred to as the "City" or as "Management," and the HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, hereinafter referred to as the "Association." 2. RECOGNITION The titles of Police Captain and Police Lieutenant are hereby abolished and replaced with the title, "Police Commander." Current incumbents in the classification of Police Lieutenant and Police Captain shall be reclassified as Police Commander, a civil service designated position. Such reclassification shall not operate to divest incumbents of any vested property right in their jobs. The new job description is attached as Attachment "B." Pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, (Government Code 3500, et seq.), the City agrees to, and does, recognize the Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association as the exclusive representative of the full-time positions in the clas- sification of Police Commander of the City of Hermosa Beach. 3. SCOPE & IMPLEMENTATION OF TEE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This memorandum of understanding constitutes the joint recommen- dation of Management and the Association. It shall not be bind- ing in whole or in part upon the parties unless and until the following conditions have been complied with: 1. The association shall notify the City Council in writing that it has formally approved the Memorandum of Understanding in its entirety. 2. The City Council shall approve this Memorandum of Understanding. 3. This MOU has been reached following good -faith negotiations, by the authorized Management representative of the City Coun- cil and the authorized representative for the Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association. 4. JOB ACTION The Association and its members agree that during the term of this MOU there shall be no strike. In the event of an unauthorized strike, the City agrees that there will be no liability on the part of the Association pro- vided the Association promptly and publicly disavows such unau- thorized action; orders the employees to return to work and at- tempts to bring about a prompt resumption of normal operations; and provided further, that the Association notifies the City in writing, within 48 hours after the commencement of such strike, what measures it has taken to comply with the provisions of this strike. In the event such strike by the Association has not affected resumption of normal work practices, the City shall have the right to take appropriate disciplinary action. 5. NON-DISCRIMINATION The City shall not discriminate against any employee because of race, color, age, creed, national origin, sex, handicap, medical condition, marital status, or union activities in any matter. 6. MANAGEMENT RIGHTS 1. Manage the City. 2. Schedule working hours. 3. Establish, modify or change work schedules or standards. 4. Institute changes in procedures. 5. Direct the work force, including the right to hire, promote, demote, transfer, suspend, discipline or discharge any employee. 6. Determine the location of any new facilities, building, departments, divisions, or subdivisions thereof, and the relocation, sale, leasing or closing of facilities, depart- ments, divisions, or subdivisions thereof. 7. Determine services to be rendered. 8. Determine the layout of buildings and equipment and materials to be used herein. 9. Determine processes, techniques, methods and means of per- forming work. 10. Determine the size, character and use of inventories. 11. Determine the financial policy including accounting procedures. 12. Determine the administrative organization of the system. 13. Determine the selection, promotion, or transfer of employees. 14. Determine the size and characteristics of the work force. 15. Determine the allocation and assignment of work to employees. 16. Determine policy affecting the selection of new employees. 17. Determine the establishment of quality and quantity standards and the judgment of quality and quantity of work required. 18. Determine administration of discipline. 19. Determine control and use of City property, materials and equipment. 20. Schedule work periods and determine the number and duration of work periods. 21. Establish, modify, eliminate or enforce rules and regulations. 22. Place work with outside firms. 23. Determine the kinds and numbers of personnel necessary. 24. Determine the methods and means by which such operations are to be conducted. 25. Require employees, where necessary, to take in-service train- ing courses during working hours. 26. Determine duties to be included in any job classifications. 27. Determine the necessity of overtime and the amount of over- time required. 28. Take any necessary action to carry out the mission of the City in cases of an emergency. The exercise of the foregoing powers, rights authority, duties and responsibilities by the City, the adoption of policies, rules, regulations and practices in furtherance thereof, and the use of judgment and the discretion in connection therewith, shall be limited only by the specific and express terms of this Memo- randum of Understanding, City Personnel Ordinance and Personnel Rules and Regulations, the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights, and other statutory laws. Except in emergencies, or where the City is required to make changes in its operations because of the requirements of law, whenever the exercise of management's rights shall impact on em- ployees of the bargaining unit, the City agrees to meet and con- fer with representatives of the Association, upon request by the Association, regarding the impact of the exercise of such rights unless the matter of the exercise of such rights is provided for in this Memorandum of Understanding. 7. PROVISIONS OF LAW - INSEPARABILITY It is mutually understood that this MOU is, and shall be, subject to all current and future applicable state, federal and local laws. If any article, part, provision or segment of this MOU is, or shall be, in conflict with or inconsistent with such ap- plicable provisions of federal, state or local law, or is other- wise held to be invalid, or unenforceable by any court of compe- tent jurisdiction by final decree, such article, part or provi- sion thereof shall be superseded by such applicable law and the remainder of this MOU shall in no way be affected thereby. 8. FULL UNDERSTANDING, MODIFICATION, WAIVER It is intended that this Agreement sets forth the full and entire understanding of the parties regarding the matters set forth herein, and any other prior to existing understanding or agree- ments by the parties whether formal or informal, regarding any such matters are hereby superseded or terminated in their entirety. Except as specifically provided herein, it is agreed and under- stood that each party hereto voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives its right, and agrees that the other shall not be required to negotiate with respect to any subject or matter covered herein during the term of this agreement. Any agreement, alteration, understanding, variation, waiver, or modification of any of the terms or provisions contained herein shall not be binding upon the parties hereto unless made and exe- cuted in writing by all parties hereto, and if required, approved and implemented by the City Council. The waiver of any breach, term or condition of this Agreement by either party shall not constitute a precedent in the future en- forcement of all its terms and provisions. 9. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE The Grievance Procedure is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. 10. WORK SCHEDULE Police Commanders shall have the choice of working a ten (10) hour day, four (4) days per work week; or an eight (8) hour day, five (5) days per work week. The City may cancel this scheduling plan, without cause, at any time during the term of this Memorandum of Understanding by giving the Association three (3) months written notice. Upon such notice, the City shall, at the request of the Association, meet and confer on a new scheduling plan. Absent mutual agreement, the City shall revert to the 5/8 plan in effect prior to the ex- perimental work plan. In the event of an emergency situation, the City may cancel, al- ter or amend the work schedule as necessary immediately. 11. COMPENSATION - METHODS OF COMPENSATION A. Methods of compensation: 1. Compensation shall be determined on an hourly basis. 2. Payments due shall be paid on a bimonthly basis unless other- wise mutually agreed. By mutual consent early payments and other modifications can be made. 3. Base hourly salary shall be considered the rate of pay for a particular classification without consideration of any other form of compensation. B. Salary Advancements Within Base Pay Range: 1. Step Advancement: a. All salary advances shall be based on merit and fitness. All increases shall be recommended by the Department Head and approved by the Personnel Officer/City Manager. Merit increases shall be effective at the beginning of a pay period. b. Upon the succesful and satisfactory completion of twelve (12) months service, employees shall be advanced one step within their range and yearly thereafter until the maxi- mum within the range achieved. 2. Promotion An employee who is promoted to a position in a class with a high- er salary rate shall be entitled to the lowest step in the higher range which exceeds the present rate of pay with the intent of increasing the base salary rate by at least 5%. C. Compensatory Time Employees may accrue up to 175 hours of compensatory time and may cash out all or part of such accrued time at any time, subject to the budgetary constraints of the department. 12. BASE SALARY Effective with the commencement of this MOU, the base salary range for the classifications in the bargaining unit shall be: STEP: A B C D 8 Commencing March 1, 1988 3954 4152 4359 4577 4806 Commencing March 1, 1989 4317 4533 4760 4998 Commencing March 1, 1990 4490 4715 4950 5198 13. EXEMPT EMPLOYEES The Classification of Police Commander is designated as exempt under FSLA. 14. INSURANCE COVERAGE A. LIFE City shall provide a life insurance policy for each employee, payable in the amount of $50,000 upon such employee's death. B. MENTAL HEALTH City shall make such a plan available to city employees; the full cost to be paid by the employee. C. VISION City shall make such a plan available to city employees; the full cost to be paid by the employee. D. HEALTH City shall provide for Association members a health insurance plan to include a choice of an annuity plan with $250.00 de- ductible or an HMO plan; both plans to include maternity care and prescription benefits. City to pay employee costs and current dependent rate with any future increased dependent costs to be borne 80% City and 20% employee. E. DENTAL City shall provide for Association members a dental insurance plan to include a choice of an annuity plan or an HMO plan. City to pay employee cost and current dependent rate with any future increased dependent costs to be borne 80% City and 20% employee. 15. DEFERRED COMPENSATION City agrees to make available to all employees in the Unit the citywide Deferred Compensation Plan. All participants being then eligible to vote on decisions of the Deferred Compensation Committee. 16. SALARY CONTINUATION PLAN Management agrees to contribute for each member of the Unit, the sum of Fourteen and 40/100 dollars ($14.40) per month per person, toward the purchase of a Long Term Disability plan through the Association. Any cost in excess of this shall be borne by the Association. 17. RETIREMENT The City agrees to continue its policy of providing employees in this representation unit with the "one year final compensation plan" for the calculation of retirement based on the highest 12 consecutive months earnings. 18. LEAVE OF ABSENCE Management agrees to allow all employees covered by this MOU to take a leave of absence without pay, not to exceed 60 days, in conjunction with, or in addition to, their regular vacation time. This leave will only be allowed every other year and cannot be taken during the months of June, July, or August. Any officer wishing to take this leave must exhaust all compensatory time prior to utilization of the leave. The officer must also exhaust vacation time. This provision shall not reduce any leave enti- tlement an employee may have under the Military and Veterans Code. 19. VACATION Vacation accrual rates shall be as follows: A. For employees initially hired before May 2, 1984. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. B. Upon hire, Commencing Commencing Commencing Commencing Commencing at the rate of 96 hours/year. with the 7th year, at the rate of 112 hours/year. with the 8th year, at the rate of 136 hours/year. with the 15th year, at the rate of 160 hours/year. with the 16th year, at the rate of 168 hours/year. with the 17th year, at the rate of 176 hours/year. For employees hired after May 1, 1984. 1. No accrual during time served as a Police Recruit. 2. Upon graduation from the Academy, or upon hire as a Lateral Entry, at the rate of 72 hours/year. 3. At the rate of 96 hours/year commencing with the thirty sixth (36) month after (2) above. 4. At the rate of 112 hours/year commencing with the 7th year after (2) above. 5. 6. C. The At the rate .of eight additional hours/year commencing with the llth year after (2) above to a maximum of 20 days/year. At the rate of eight additional hours/year commencing with the llth year after (2) above to a maximum of 20 days/year. Each member of the bargaining unit will be required to use the number of hours accumulated for vacation purposes during each fiscal year. During the fiscal year, if within ninety (90) days following completion of the fiscal year the indi- vidual has not utilized these vacation hours off, they shall then be paid for them. An individual may accumulate and hold as unused vacation hours an amount equal to the total num- berof hours that can be accrued in an 18 -month period. 20. HOLIDAYS following holidays shall be considered as paid: New Year's Day Lincoln's Birthday Washington's Birthday Memorial Day Independence Day Labor Day Veteran's Day Thanksgiving Day Day after Thanksgiving Christmas Day 21. SICK LEAVE Sick leave accrual shall be as follows: 1. For all employees initially hired before May 2, 1984: A. Those employees having less than 176 accrued hours of sick leave shall accrue sick leave at the rate of 6 hours per month until their accrual accumulates to 176 hours at which time their accrual shall be 8 hours per month. B. A once a year cash -in can be up to 100% of the unused sick leave as long as at least 176 accrued hours remains on hand. An employee may accrue a maximum of three hun- dred and fifty hours (350); thereafter any excess shall be cashed out. Employees who have more than 350 hours of sick time on the books as of June 1, 1988 shall be frozen at that accumulation; any sick time in excess of that amount shall be cashed out. 2. For employees hired after May 1, 1984: A. Zero during academy. B. Upon graduation from the Academy or upon hire as a lateral entry, 4 hours per month for the initial 12 months. C. 5 hours per month for the next 12 months. D. 6 hours per month therafter and subject to all of (1) above. 3. Upon termination from City employment, sick leave will be paid at the current hourly rate, on the following conditions: 1. One-quarter pay from 5 to 10 years of continuous service. 2. One-half pay from 10 years until termination. Upon service retirement from the City all unused sick leave shall be converted to paid duty status. Said accrued hours shall be included in total compensation calculations for retirement purposes. 22. BEREAVEMENT LEAVE Each employee shall receive a maximum of 24 hours per calendar year to be utilized for bereavement leave because of a death in their immediate family. Immediate family shall mean and include only the employee's spouse, children, stepchildren, parents, brothers and sisters. Said time will not be cumulative from one twelve month period to another nor will pay in lieu of unused leave for bereavement be provided. 23. MANAGEMENT LEAVE Police Commanders shall be allowed 40 hours of additional leave each calendar year in addition to the fixed holidays and bereave- ment leave. Management leave does not accumulate or carry over, it must be used each year. The current practice of earning com- pensatory time (with exception of the regular monthly accrual) shall continue during the term of this Memorandum of Understand- ing. 24. EDUCATIONAL REIMBURSEMENT The City agrees that Police Commanders who desire to enroll in training and academic courses that may provide the employee with general or specific skills and/or knowledge that contributes to their ability to perform their current position or enhances pro- motional opportunities, shall have their course fees (up to CSU rate), books, materials, and tuition (CSU rate) paid by the City, in advance, subject to the approval of the City Manager. The employee will reimburse the City for all expenses if the employee fails or does not complete the courses. 23. UNIFORM ALLOWANCE Said allowance for Police Commanders to be $600 per year, payable through the regular payroll schedule. An absence due to sick leave, injury on duty, or leave of absence without pay, exceeding sixty (60) days shall result in a pro -rata reduction in uniform allowance for the time of the absence. 26. AMMUNITION REPLACEMENT In addition to the quarterly qualification ammunition, each of- ficer will be allowed to utilize fifty (50) rounds.of ammunition for their primary duty weapon, at City expense, each month at the firing range used by the Department. The City will also pay for the expense of using the range. The ammunition will be used to practice on an approved course of fire so that officers will be- come more proficient with their service weapons. The City will not compensate officers for the time spent to utiize this ammunition. Officers must use the allotted ammuni- tion each month, it does not accumulate. 27. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MERIT PAY Police Commanders will be eligible to receive Merit Pay based on performance. Said merit pay will range from -7.5% to +7.5% of the base monthly salary, payable for three month increments. The standard to be considered will be timely response to and level of completion of those goals and objectives established between the employee and the Director of Public Safety at the commencement of the evaluation period. This provision is not subject to the grievance process, the discipline process, or any other type of appeal process, for merit payments of 0% to 7.5%. Any negative payment (less than 0%) is disciplinary in nature and is subject to the usual appeal procedures. 28. DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS For the purpose of defining discipinary actions, the following definitions shall be applicable: 1. Disciplinary actions are defined as: a. Dismissal. b. Suspension. c. Demotion. d. Reprimand (written.) e. Reductions in pay. 2. Reductions in pay are governed by the "Green Section" of the Police Manual. 3. Appeals from the disciplinary actions shall only be sub- ject to the "Blue" section of the Police Manual entitled "Rules and Regulations." 4. Prior to the commencement of any internal investigation which is likely to subject the officer to disciplinary action, the officer shall be advised of their rights pur- suant to Section 3300, et. seq., of the California Government Code as amended. All rights contained therein shall be applicable to the disciplinary actions and shall be used as a minimum guideline only. 5. Any reprimand record or other writing containing negative comments (with the exception of Performance Evaluations) included in the employees personnel package is a written reprimand. 6. Inclusionary periods as currently set forth in the Police Department Rules and Regulations shall remain in effect during this M.O.U. 7. Any officer receiving time off dispensed as a result of disciplinary action can use either accumulated compensa- tory time or vacation time at their discretion. However, when exceptional circumstances arise and the City feels that it is in the best interest to keep an officer off duty for a limited period of time (not to exceed five (5) working days), the City may exercise this right. 29. LAYOFF Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 2-42 as currently enacted, is the governing provision regarding layoff. However, City fur- ther agrees that prior to implementation of any such layoff, dis- cussions shall be held to explore other alternatives, mitigation, etc. 30. NO SMOKING The parties agree that the City shall amend its class specifica- tions for unit positions to provide that employees who become unit employees after the date this MOU goes into effect shall, as a condition of their continued employment, refrain from smoking tobacco or any other non -tobacco substance at any time on or off duty. Violation of this condition of employment shall be deemed good cause for dismissal. 31. FURTHER STUDIES The City and Association jointly recognize that some matters need further study and negotiation during the life of the M.O.U. It is therefore agreed that the following items will be addressed: 1. Physical fitness program. 2. The City and the members of the Commanders Unit agree to study, during the month of September 1989, the salary range for the classification of Commander. The purpose of this study will be to compare the ex- isting Commander classification with comparable clas- sifications in other municipalities, as well as the internal relationship to subordinate classifications. It is recognized by both parties that if proper com- pensation is not maintained in relation to comparable classes in other municipalities, as well to the internal salary structure, the result would be a situation which can adversely affect employee morale and productivity. Nothing herein shall require the City to make any salary adjustment as a result of the above study. 32. DURATION OF CONTRACT This MOU is effective March 1, 1988 and shall remain in full force and effect for 36 months thereafter, ending February 28, 1991. In witness whereof, the parties hereto have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Memorandum of Under- standing this day of , 1988. HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFI ERS' ASSOCIAT ON �b • CITY OF I RMO A B Steve Wisniewski D rector of Publi Robert Blackwood Personnel Director fety vARCE PROCEDURES FOR CACU POLICE DEPARTMENT ATM NT "A" rievance Procedures to improved employee -employer relations by %ing grievance a procedures on matters. le that grievances shall be heard and settled rally as possible. grievances to be settled. promptly and/or :o the point of origin as possible. .s defined as any dispute concerning the In, intent or application of the written Understanding or departmental rules and •ovorning personnel practices or working plicable to 'employees covered by the Understanding. An impasse in meeting g upon the teras of a proposed Memorandum ing'is not a grievance. ievance Procedure ne may request the assistance of another his own choosing in preparing and prese:•:tit 1 ince at any level of review, or may be ad by a recognized employee organization, present himself. representative, if any, may nt of work time, as determined vision Commander, and a and Representative, in presenting a grievance. g to the retroactive status of tters shall be limited to the grievance in writing, except in ould be impossible for the r knowledge of an accounting rror is departmentally or fied may be extended to a al agreement of the employee erned. oe from reprisal for using Iv. Matters Subject to Grievance Procedure Full-time employees having probationary or permanent status may process a personal grievance on one, or more than one, of the following grounds. a. Improper application of rules, regulations and procedures. b. Unfair treatment, including coercion, restraint, or reprisal. c. Reduction in force action - layoffs. d. Promotion procedures implemented unfairly. e. Classification of position. f. Non -selection for training opportunities. g. Discrimination because of race, religion, color creed, or national origin. h. Any matter affecting an employee's work schedule, fringe benefits, holidays, vacation, sick leave, retirement, performance, rating, a change in classification, salary, work assignment, or any other matter affecting wages, hours or working conditions. i. Discharge, demotion, or suspension. j. Individual disputes over the intents or application. of the provisions of the most recent,officially signed agreement between the City and their recognized employee representatives. Probationary employees may file grievances under all of the above, but not as applied to their performance ratir.. or dismissal. V. Grievance Procedure a. Step One - Informal Process An employee must attempt first to resolve a grievance through discussion with his immediate supervisor with- out undue delay on an informal basis. If, after such discussion the employee does not believe the problem has been satisfactorily resolved, he shall have the right and obligation to discuss it with his supervisor' immediate superior, if any, and his department head if necessary. Every effort shall be made to find an acceptable solution by these informal means at the most immediate level of supervision. At no time may the informal process go beyond the department head concerned. In order that this informal procedure may be responsive, all parties involved shall expedite this process. In no case may more than fifteen (15) calendar days elapse from the date of the alleged incident or action and the resolutions of the grievance or com- pletion of the informal process. Said grievance shall be considered waived if not so presented to the im- mediate supervisor within fifteen (15) calendar days following the day during which the event upon which the grievance is based occurred. Step Two - Formal Process - Management Supervisor If the grievance is not resolved through the informal process, the employee shall have the right within ten (10) working days from the decision or completion of the informal process to file the grievance in writing on a specified form and present it to his Division Commander. The Division Commander shall discuss the grievance with the employee and shall render a V. Grievance Procedure decision and comments in writing and return them to the employee within ten (10) working days after receiving the grievance. Failure of the grievant to serve such written notice ten (10) calendar days following the termination of the informal step shall constitute a waiver of the grievance. Step Three - Formal Process - Department Head If the grievance procedure is not resolved at Step 2 and the employee is notified in writing, the employee may, within the next five (5) working days present the grievance in writing to the department head. In the event that no written response is given to the employee within ten (10) working days from the date of submissioi of the written grievance, the grievance will be as- sumed to have been valid and the employer will take steps to correct that problem. Failure of the em- ployee to take appropriate action within the pres- cribed time periods will be deemed to constitute termination of the grievance. Failure of the em- ployer to respond within the time provided will be deemed to be an admission as to the validity of the grievance and will require affirmative action to correct the grievance. The department head shall render his decision and comments in writing within five (5) working days from the date of receipt of% the grievance and return them to the employee within that time. V. Grievance Procedure Step Four - Advisory Arbitration a. If the grievance is not resolved in Step 3 the employee may within five (5) working days, present the grievance in writing to the City Manager or his designate for processing. Failure of the employee to take this action within five (5) working days from the date of receipt of rejection of ..the grievance in Step 3 will be deemed to constitute a termination of the grievance. b. The scope of the advisory arbitration of grievance shall include all of the grievable matters as set forth in Section 4 of this procedure. An exception would be those matters that by Peoples Ordinance NS 211 must be adjudicated by the IIermosa Beach Civil Service Commis- sion. All other grievances shall bypass Step 4 of the grievance procedure and go to .the Step 5 procedures. An employee who chooses advisory arbitration shall be deemed to have made a choice between the Civil Service Board of Review and arbitration and, therefore, may not seek two hearings on the same grievance. c. As soon as possible, and in any event not later than ten (10) work days after either party received written notice from the other of the desire to arbitrate, the parties shall agree upon an arbitrator unless externa. constraints prohibit compliance, whereupon the earliest date available shall apply. Grievance Procedure d. Arbitrator shall be selected from a list of seven (7) arbitrators from within two (2) working days. If a mutual agreement cannot be reached at a meeting of the two parties as to selection of an arbitrator, then each party shall strike off a name from the list on an alternating basis until one name remains, which person shall become the arbitrator. The City shall have the first opportunity to strike a name from the list of seven (7) arbitrators. The priorit of striking names shall alternate from one party to the other each time advisory arbitration is invoked by the same parties. e. Any arbitrator appointed must be familiar with em- ployee/management relations in public employment. f. The arbitrator shall hold such hearings and conduct such proceedings as may be necessary, but such hear- ings and proceedings shall be conducted in an ex- peditious and confidential manner with the involved parties only. Employees called as witnesses shall be released from duty as needed. g. The rules of conduct of proceedings shall be ac- cording to those procedures utilized by the Ar- bitration Service. h. The findings of fact and the recommendations Qf t.-: arbitrator shall be transmitted to the involved parties and the City Administrator. -a V. Grievance Procedure i. The fees and expenses, including the making of the record of the arbitrator, shall be borne equally by the parties. Calling of the witnesses by either party shall be done with a reasonable amount of restraint. An excessive use of witnesses will necessitate the cost of loss of work time to be paid by the party calling the witnesses. A decision of the arbitrator may be requested by either party as to whether there may have been an excessive use of witnesses. j. The arbitrator shall have no power to alter, amend, change, add to, or subtract from any of the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding. The decision of the arbitrator shall be based solely upon the evidence and arguments presented to him by the respective parties in the presence of each other. k. The decision of the arbitrator shall be final upon the parties to the dispute unless either party, within 60 days after the final written decision of the arbitrator is personally served upon the party, causes to be filed in a court of competent jur.- sdiction a complaint to review all or any part of t proceeding, upon litigation, the entire matter sh 1_ be reviewed and a trial de novo held. • ATTACHMENT 'B" POLICE COMMANDER DEFINITION Under general direction of the Director of Public Safety,plans and directs the activities of a major division of the Police Department; participates as a member of the police management team in the consideration of departmental problems and issues; and performs related duties as required. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES Assigns, directs, reviews, supervises, manages, coordinates, and evaluates the work of police personnel in a major division of the department (Patrol, Support Services, Staff Services, or Administration). Duties vary dependent upon departmental division assigned, but may include such duties as: oversees the community crime prevention/education program; manages and directs jail opera- tions; manages and directs the operation of data processing and communications; directs and reviews all work of subordinates; acts as staff liaison to city com- missions and boards; participates as a member of police management team in the formation of departmental policy, procedures, rules and regulations; provides information to the public on police activities and handles citizen complaints; makes recommendation for purchase and/or procurement of department equipment and supplies; conducts administrative investigations as directed by the Director of Public Safety; manages and coordinates all training activities for department personnel; performs a variety of administrative duties including budget prepara- tion, staff reports, grant management and staff reviews; manages and directs the control and custody of evidence and property; directs preparation of criminal cases for presentation to the district attorney for appropriate disposition; manages and directs patrol shifts; manages and directs the work of part-time and volunteer personnel; manages and directs the activities of special units such as traffic enforcement and beach patrol; assists in selection, hiring, development, evaluation, and disciplining of personnel; maintains liaison with community groups and agencies; and provides general administrative assistance to the Director of Public Safety. REQUIREMENTS Completion of two years of college, advanced POST certificate and three years of supervisory experience at the sergeant level or two years supervisory experience at the Lieutenant level, plus four years experience as a police officer in a municipal police department. SOUTH BAY CENTER FOR COUNSELING ked adiv tomasa t vieede 2617 Bell Avenue, Manhattan Beach, California 90266 0 (213) 545-6575 July 5, 1988 Etta Simpson, Mayor Hermosa Beach City Council 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Mayor Simpson: 0°1144) fiCEIVEb JUL 5 1988. City Clerk City ot Hennese Cosa 40281010 We respectfully request to be placed on the agenda for the City Council meeting of July 26, 1988. We will be making a request for free space for the Stop -By Center. hik you, Caryl Blom Assistant Director, Clinical Services Lee Schmidt Director, Stop -By Center National Council on Alcoholism of the South Bay 1334 Post Avenue • Torrance, Califomia 90501 • (213) 328-1460 June 16, 1988 Mayor and Members of City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mayor and Members of City Council: The National Council on Alcoholism of the South Bay and Fuller Theological Seminary of Pasadena and several other local agencies are co -sponsoring a one -day workshop on "Women: Alcoholism, other Addictions and Society," tentatively planned for Thursday, January 26, 1989 at 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. We are hoping to be able to use the Hermosa Beach Community Center because of its perfect location for this event. We will need the auditorium and four (4) break-out rooms for the on-going workshops. Unfortunately we do not have funds available for the $600 rental fee your city plans to charge. As in the prior years admissions, using sliding scale do not cover all the expenses we incur organizing this event. Therefore we are respectfully requesting that you waive your usual fee for the rental of your center. The National Council on Alcoholism of the South Bay is a non-profit tax-exempt organization that has been serving the South Bay area since 1973. We offer several programs free of charge, such as telephone helpline counseling, information and referral, individual consultation, crisis -intervention, community education lectures, rap groups for women, peer counseling education lectures, the Sunrise and BABES programs. We look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely, etty B nburg xeouti Direct BB:sg AFFILIATED WITH THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Yu-Ying Ting, Clerk Typist SUBJECT: City Council Agenda Item #5, Biltmore Site SPA Report DATE: July 11, 1988 Attached please find draft Planning Commission minutes of July 5, 1988 to complete the Biltmore Site SPA report. Also, please insert the attached 4 pages of Exhibit A into your report after page 10. They were inadvertently omitted from the staff report. Thanks. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION BILTMORE SITE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA — ORDINANCE 84-751 (REFERRED BACK BY THE CITY COUNCIL) The City Council has requested that the Planning Commission consider the proposed modifications. Essentially, the intent is to eliminate any additional discretionary actions after the approval of the SPA ordinance. The basic areas of concern are: (1) trash enclosures; (2) bicycle spaces; and (3) required conditional use permits. Chmn. Peirce discussed the City Council comments made on this item at their last meeting. He noted that the City Attorney has included several conditions in the proposed Biltmore Site Specific Plan. Chmn. Peirce directed the Commission's attention to the City Attorney's letter dated June 29, 1988, with the recommended changes by the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Company to the Specific Plan for the Biltmore Site. Mr. Lough stated that his letter contains recommendations made by the Railway Company to the 1985 specific plan area. He noted, however, that this matter will probably be placed on the ballot. Mr. Lough stated that the purpose of a Specific Plan is to act as a tool to regulate much more specifically than a zoning ordinance, and it limits the development or use of the land to the specific items within the specific plan. Mr. Lbugh discussed the proposed changes, explaining that Section 9:615 should be changed from "public park" to "garden plaza." The proposed 1985 development was a public/private development. The idea is now being discussed to sell the Biltmore site and possibly Lot C, which would then make the land privately owned. Park facilities would still be desired; however, it would not be desirable to have public control over a private park, mainly because of liability issues. Therefore, the wording should be changed to __ "garden plaza." He continued by explaining some of the legal problems which could arise if the wording "public park" remains. He noted, however, that the space will remain as a park -type land. The Planning Director has also included conditions related to the park - type area. 4.4 Mr. Lough discussed Section 9.619, explaining that that section will establish typical conditional use permit standards which have been applied in the area around the beach. He stated that he culled several of the conditions imposed on the Comedy and Magic Club for incorporation into this document. After discussion with the railroad, the document was returned to the City. He noted that the Planning Commission would still retain its discretionary reviews if this remains as a conditional use permit.. Chmn. Peirce asked whether the City Attorney had any recommendations as to conditions to add to this document in order to protect the City. Mr. Lough explained that he had discussed the matter with representatives from the railroad; this is the document which resulted from those discussions. He stated that the only thing which should be incorporated would possibly be hours of operation. He noted, 18 P.C. Minutes 7/5/88 however, that it is difficult to impose hours of operation when it has not yet been determined what the uses will be. He suggested that the Commission wait to see what the uses will be; if there are problems, additional conditions could be imposed. He noted that a hotel operator desires orderliness; otherwise, customers will not be able to sleep. Mr. Lough discussed the parking, explaining that since the 1985 ordinance, new parking requirements have been adopted thereby making the requirements more stringent. He stated that not considering shared parking, 403 parking spaces would now be necessary. He continued by explaining how the parking requirements were determined for this project. He stated that the analysis was done based on reports done by national land use planners. Mr. Lough stated that a condition should be added on Page 6 under HBCC Appendix A -A Zoning: "Valet parking shall be required at all times whenever tandem parking is used." Mr. Lough discussed Section 9.621 (h) and (1) and Section 9.623 where it is suggested to delete the wording "and approval of the Planning Director." He explained that the Planning Commission will have later discretionary approval; since this issue will probably be on the ballot, the public should be able to make a decision which is not based on later discretionary approval. 'Comm. Ingell suggested the inclusion of several conditions: (1) The establishment shall not adversely affect the welfare of the residents and/or commercial establishments in nearby; (2) Screening shall be installed on all openable exterior windows at ground level to prevent the pass-through of alcoholic beverages and to control insect problems. Mr. Lough stated that the first suggestion is in the document as Condition No. 6. Mr. Lough stated that this building will have sealed windows;.:therefore,.he. did not feel screened windows to be necessary. Comm. Ingell continued: (3) Signs shall be posted in a conspicuous location warning patrons of the illegality of open containers in any public area such as the street and beach. Mr. Lough stated that that condition seems reasonable. Comm. Ingell continued: (4) All alcoholic beverages shall be served in non -throw -away glass containers, including beet and wine. Mr. Lough could think of no objection to such a condition; however, he would need to consult the railroad people. Comm. Ingell continued: (5) The police chief may determine that if a continuing police problem exists, it may require the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel; (6) The exterior of the premises, including parking areas, shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner; (7) Any changes to the interior layout shall be subject to the review of the Planning Commission; (8) This conditional use permit is exclusively for and so long as the premises remain a restaurant (or hotel); (9) The business must maintain a food/alcohol sales ratio of (to be determined) percent. Mr. Schubach noted that all of the standard conditions of approval as suggested by Comm. Ingell are in the City Code under Article 10.7. He suggested that that Article be referenced in the document. Mr. Lough stated that the percentages were discussed; however, they were inadvertently omitted. 19 P.C. Minutes 7/5/88 Comm. Ingell continued: (10) Alcoholic beverages may be served only during the times when the service of food sis available; (11) Maximum permissible occupancy shall be clearly posted and shall not be exceeded at any time; (12) This establishment shall be in compliance with all Building and Fire Department regulations; (13) Any violations of the conditions of approval and/or violations of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is grounds for either a 50 dollar or above fine, or a revocation hearing. - Chmn. Peirce noted .that all of these conditions are contained in Article 10 on Page 516 of the code. He asked whether there would be any objection to referencing all of Article 10 in the document. Mr. Lough stated that that would not be a problem. Comm. Ingell continued: He suggested the addition of a Condition 7(a) stating "The general manager shall be aware of all conditions of all of the businesses located within the hotel." Also Condition No. 8 should reference the general manager. Comm. Edwards asked for background information on what is being done now and what has previously been done in regard to this document. Comm. Edwards discussed the prior EIR and noted that the document addressed traffic problems and proposed remedies. However, he saw no specific traffic mitigation measures to be imposed. Chmn. Peirce explained the traffic mitigations previously proposed. • Comm. Ingell noted concern over the hours of operation at this establishment. He noted that other CUPs contain specific hours of operation. Chmn. Peirce stated, however, that the hotel must be allowed to begin operations; the City can then impose additional conditions if problems arise: ,..He. noted that the City does not have extensive experience with CUPs for hotels. Parker Herriott, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission, and stated that four hotels have previously been denied at this location. He did not feel that the City Council should be burdening the Commission and citizens again with this issue. Mr. Herriott continued by giving background history of this site and the proposed hotels. He voiced his objections to the 1984 and 1985 specific plans. Mr. Herriott stated that he opposes a hotel on the site because of traffic and density problems, especially since the proposed site is very close to residential areas. He also notedconcern about increased noise in the area. Additionally, the height limit in the surrounding area is only 35 feet, the hotel proposal is for 39 feet. He felt that the height should be limited to 35 feet. Chmn. Peirce stated that the Commission agreed that the height limitation should be 39 feet. They also agreed that Article 10 of the code should be referenced in the document. It was agreed to revert to the original recommendation of the specific plan in regard to the 58 percent less or minus 2 percent for development standards. Comm. Ketz asked for clarification on the height issue. Chmn. Peirce explained the height. Mr. Lough stated that Comms. Ketz and Edwards have read the previous minutes on this issue; therefore, there was no objection to their partaking in the discussion of this matter. 20 P.C. Minutes 7/5/88 Comm. Edwards discussed the previous focused EIR, Book 1, March 1984, as it related to traffic •and thegeneration of additional vehicle trips. He asked for clarification of the proposed mitigation measures. • Mr. Schubach stated that he was not working in the City in 1984. The 1984 EIR related to a previous proposal and is therefore not relevant to this project. If this measure goes on the ballot, an EIR would not be required. Mr. Lough explained the differences between the previous proposal and the proposal now before the Commission. He discussed the proposed parking for the hotel. Mr. Schubach stated that no sophisticated calculations have been performed for the new proposal because the City Council has requested the Commission's input on this document as soon as possible since the issue will be placed on the ballot. He stated that if the Commission desires, they can recommend to the Council that additional calculations be made in regard to parking and traffic. He stressed that the previous EIR was prepared on the basis of a much larger hotel. Mr. Schubach explained, in response to questions from Comms. Edwards and Ketz, the parking proposed for the current project. He stated that the calculations took into account peak hours. Comm. Ingell stated that the assertion that the peak hours are during the day holds true for only about three months of the year. During the other nine months, the peak hours are definitely during the evening hours. Mr. Lough summarized the differences between the 1984 proposal and the current proposal: (1) the number of rooms has now been lowered; (2) the number of parking spaces has now been increased; (3) the size of the restaurant has-been. decreased; (4). the conference area has been downsized; (5) the bar area. has now been downsized; and (6)- additional bicycle spaces have been added. Comm. Edwards asked about the hours of construction and mitigation measures to limit the effects of construction. Chmn. Peirce stated that the builders must adhere to the code in regard to limiting hours of construction. Mr. Schubach stated that. construction requirements are contained in the Building Code. Therefore, it is not necessary to include such a condition. MOTION by Chmn. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Ingell, that the specific plan be returned to the City Council with the following modifications: To include everything contained in tonight's staff recommendation, but to incorporate Article 10.7 of the code, per the City Attorney's suggestion, under Section 9.619(e); to include a Condition 7(a) requiring that the general manager shall be aware of all conditions for all establishments located within the hotel; to include a Condition 8(a) requiring that the general manager shall read and sign a copy of the conditional use permit; a condition shall be added requiring that any violations of the conditions of approval and/or violations of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is grounds for either a 50 dollar or above fine, or a revocation hearing; to change the height limit from 40 feet to 39 feet; that the parking spaces be determined per the staff recommendation; that a condition be added requiring that valet parking shall be required at all times whenever tandem parking is used. 21 P.C. Minutes 7/5/88 Comm. Edwards commented on the use of an airport shuttle and asked whether that is a condition. Mr. Lough explained the use of a shuttle as it pertains to a development agreement. He stated that that issue is contained in the body of the Specific Plan under Section 9.622. Comm. Edwards noted concern over traffic and parking at the proposed site. He asked whether other options are being addressed at this time. Mr. Lough stated that the Commission is being asked to look only at a particular section of the document at this time. Comm. Ingell felt that a trolly system would be beneficial to the City. Mr. Lough noted, however, that the cost of the previous trolly was quite expensive. Comm. Edwards felt that more study should be given to the issue of traffic impacts and mitigations measures. He noted that a hotel would add significantly to the traffic in the area. Comm. Ingell stated that a traffic circulation element is currently being prepared. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION by Chmn. Peirce as maker and agreed to by Comm. Ingell as second, to recommend to the City Council that additional traffic mitigation meaures should be studied for any proposal placed on the ballot. AYES: Comms. Ingell, Ketz, Rue, Chmn. Peirce NOES: None ABSTAIN: Comm. Edwards ABSENT: None 1J 22 P.C. Minutes 7/5/88 July 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council July 12, 1988 SUBJECT: REFERRAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION REGARDING BILTMORE SITE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA (SPA) Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends that the attached ordinance be adopted. And further recommends that Traffic Mitigation Measures be investigated in light of the discussion contained in the previous E.I.R. for the proposed hotel in 1984. Background The City Council referred back the Planning Commission's recommended ordinance amending the 1984 adopted SPA for further consideration regarding parking standards, and future discretionary actions required by the proposed SPA in conjunction with on -sale alcohol, health and fitness facility, entertainment, trash enclosures, landscaping, and bicycle parking. Analysis The Planning Commission has modified their original recommendation in regard to the items noted above. Changes have been underlined and deletions are indicated with a dashed line in the attached document. Attachments 1. Document with Modifications. 2. Planning Commission Minutes of July 5, 1988 (not available until July 11, 1988). 3. Proposed Ordinance. CONCUR: Kevin B. Northraft City Manager. Respectfully s bmitted, 1c- - •c u.!ch Planning Director 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM, ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 84-751 A SPECIFIC PLAN AREA TO REGULATE DEVELOPMENT GENERALLY IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA BETWEEN 15TH AND 13TH STREETS AND THE STRAND AND HERMOSA AVENUE. ARTICLE 9.6, CHAPTER 1, SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 1 Section 9.611. Authority This Specific Plan is an instrument for implementing the Local Coastal Program ("LCP") and General Plan of the City, pursuant to Article 8, Chapter 3 of the State Planning and Zoning Law (Cal. Gov't. Code Sec. 65450 et elg.). Section 9.612. Location This Specific Plan regulates the "Biltmore Site" and adjacent lots (the "Subject Property") bounded on the west by the Strand, partially bounded on the north by Fifteenth Street, partially bounded on the east by Hermosa Avenue and on the south by Thirteenth Street as described in the Basic Concept Drawings attached hereto as Exhibit "A." Section 9.613. Area Description The Subject Property encompasses 2.99 acres of topographically flat land, consisting of 2.33 acres of vacant land and .66 acres upon which one and two story residential/commercial buildings now exist. The Subject Property is located near the Central Business District ("CBD") and adjacent to the Strand providing an opportunity for commercial/recreational development that could contribute significantly to the economy of the City and the revitalization of the commercial district. Section 9.614. Basic Concept Drawings The Basic Concept Drawings attached hereto as Exhibit "A" depict the boundaries of the Subject Property, the location of the Project and the alterations proposed to existing streets. Exhibit "A" also indicates the basic design concept for the Project incorporating the objectives, policies, standards and regulations herein. Section 9.615. Purpose The purpose of this Specific Plan is to set forth design principles and development standards for a hotel, conference center, parking facilities, Garden Plaza and other ancillary uses (the "Project") that will enhance the commercial and recreational potential of the Subject Property while achieving the goals, policies, and objectives articulated in the General Plan and the LCP. This Specific Plan *Shull provide the following: -2.- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 10 11 (a) Establish objectives, policies, regulations, development standards, and review criteria for the Project on the Subject Property; (b) Preserve the unique coastal character of the area and assure that development of the Subject Property will comply with California Coastal Act policies, promote local economic stability, and meet the needs of local residents and beach visitors; and (c) Implement the goals, objectives, and policies identified in the Local Coastal Program Element of the General Plan. Section 9.616. Specific Plan Development Objectives Proper development of the Subject Property is critical to the economic and environmental future of the City, therefore, the major objectives of this Specific Plan are as follows: (a) Assure the development of the Project in a manner consistent with the Hermosa Beach City Code ("HBCC") and the scale and location of the Subject Property; 12 (b) Assure coastal access for visitors and residents; 13 (c) Assure adequate parking; 14 (d) Minimize adverse impacts of the Project on neighboring residential uses, especially as they relate to 15 traffic, noise and visual effects; 16 (e) Establish a long range and continuing source of revenue for the City; 17 (f) Facilitate the safe and convenient flow of traffic in the area; and (g) Provide for permitted uses which are complementary to the Project use and to the City's CBD. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 9.617. Area Development Policies To effectively achieve the foregoing objectives, the following policies shall be applied to the design and construction of the Project: (a) Project unity and identity shall be achieved through the careful siting of building and parking areas, the development of an effective circulation system, the coordination and control of building design, landscaping, lighting, signing, and similar features. (b) The design and control of pedestrian and vehicular circulation shall provide safe and convenient access to the Project. (c) The standards of development set forth in Section 9.621 below shall be applied'1'b realize the unique potential of - 3.- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the area and to provide for a high quality Project, compatible with commercial uses while maintaining a desirable environment for surrounding residents. Maximum flexibility, consistent with the goals, objectives and policies expressed herein, shall be allowed to encourage imaginative design and development. Section 9.618. Primary Permitted Uses (A) Hotel; Section 9.619 Ancillary Permitted Uses (A) Conference Center facility; (B) Parking facilities; (C) Compatible Uses: (1) Food related: a. Restaurant, excluding drive-ins; b. Delicatessen; c. On-site alcoholic beverage sales, including bars and cocktail lounges, provided such uses are a part of a bona fide eating place or hotel (subject to all applicable standards of Article 10 Conditional Use Permit Standards and Article 20, Penalty, of the Hermosa Beach Zoning Ordinance). The City shall have the right during business hours, upon 15'days notice, to inspect the books and records of the applicant to determine --if gross sales of alcohol beverages meet all Hermosa Beach code requirement. Upon request at the inspection, the owner/operator of the business shall also submit to the City copies of all records submitted to the State Board of Equalization for the purposes of verifying the applicant's books and records, with the understanding that these reviews are confidential; (2) Entertainment and recreation related (subjcct to issuancc of a C.U.P.): a. Dancing; b. Live entertainment; c. Amplified and recorded music; d. Audio/visual entertainment; Health and fitness facility (c.u.r. e. (3) Service related: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a. Automotive rental agency storage of not more than three rental vehicles (excluding repair and/or servicing); cleaning; guest only; b. Apparel repair, alteration and c. Barber and beauty shop; d. Shoe repair and polishing; e. Ticket sales agency; f. Travel agency;• g. Health and fitness facility for hotel (4) Retail related: a. Apparel shop; b. Art gallery; c. Bookstore; d. Camera shop; e. Candy, nut and confectionary shop; f. Cigar store; g. Drugstore; h. Florist; i. Greeting card shop; j. Jewelry shop; k. Specialty gift shop; 1. Stationery store; (D) Other uses not permitted above may be determined by the Planning Commission to be permitted uses if they meet the following criteria: (1) The proposed use will not create circumstances, effects or conditions which are undesirable, more intensive or substantially different than the other uses permitted herein. Factors to consider are traffic, hours of operation, equipment, and the nature of the use; (2) The proposed use will be compatible with the uses permitted herein; (3) The proposed use is similar in scope, purpose, and operation to the Oses permitted herein; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 stated herein; prohibited. (4) The proposed use will promote the objectives (5) The proposed use is not otherwise Section 9.620. Prohibited Uses All uses are prohibited unless provided for and authorized herein. Under no circumstance shall the following uses be permitted as principal or accessory uses: (a) Residential dwellings, including trailer and mobile home parks; (b) Churches, Synagogues, temples and other uses primarily devoted to religious worship; (c) Educational institutions; (d) Drive-in restaurants; (e) Billboards; (f) Hospitals, sanitariums, homes for the aged and other similar uses. Section 9.621. Subject Property Development Standards To achieve the foregoing objectives, the following standards shall be applied to the development of any Project on the Subject Property: -(a) Intensity. Development of the Subject Property shall comply with the following: (1) The above grade lot coverage of the Project shall not exceed 60% of the Subject Property; (2) The number of guest rooms shall not exceed 250; (3) The Conference Center facility shall not exceed an area of 7,000 square feet. (b) Building Height. The Project shall have no more than four (4) stories and the building height shall not exceed 40 feet. (c) Parking. The Project shall provide not less than 420 subterranean parking spaces. Provision for striping, parking for the physically handicapped, compact spaces, stall design, tandem, turning radii and similar standards shall be as specified in HBCC Appendix A -Zoning. Valet parking shall be required at all times when tandem parking is used. The HBCC provides that in projects that can demonstrate, based on a parking study and parking plan, that opportunities for shared parking are available, the number of parking spaces to be required shall be the number determined by such parking study and parking plan to -6- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 be needed. The parking study and parkin. plan preRared in 1984 for a hotel project previous y proposed or the Subject Property demonstrated a need for not more than 390 parking spaces. The Project shall provide not less than 420 parking spaces, though it is recongnized that it contains 12 less hotel rooms, 1,250 less square feet of assembly area and 1.980 less square feet of entertainment ounge/bar area than the hotel project for which the parking plan and study was prepared. Accordingly, the 420 spaces are determined to be adequate and in compliance with HBCC requirements. (d) Open Space. As indicated on Exhibit "A", the Project shall preserve and enhance open space by providing and maintaining the following: (1) A plaza facing the Strand; (2) An approximately 1/2 acre park for general public use. To the extent permitted by law, no future non -park use may be made of the surface of the park -designated area of the Subject Property unless and until this Specific Plan is amended according to Article 15 Amendments of the zoning ordinance. (e) Architectural Considerations. (1) Compatible architectual treatment shall be carried out on the front, rear and sides of the entire development; (2) Roof. The roof shall be sand -colored; (3) Windows. The use of chrome -colored or mirrored glass shall be prohibited. (f) Equipment. Air conditioners, duct work and similar equipment shall not be located on the roof of the building and shall be screened from public view. (g) Circulation. (1) Fifteenth Court shall be made one-way eastbound to ensure a circular flow of traffic for service vehicles; (2) There shall be no public pedestrian ingress from 15th Street; (3) There shall be no public pedestrian ingress from Beach Drive between 15th Street and 15th Court. (h) Landscaping. Landscaping and automatic irrigation prepared by a licenced landscape architect shall be provided and made complementary to the Subject Property's coastal location; (1) Guidelines a. Landscaped areas should be planned and designed as an integral part of the project. The type, quantity - % - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and placement of plant material should be selected for its struc- ture, texture, color and compatibility with the building design and materials. b. Exterior lighting, signs, walls and walkways should also be incorporated as an ntergral part of the landscape design. c. Soil, water, sun conditions and other factors should be considered in the choice of specific plant materials. (2) Plant Materials a. Minimum size box. All newly planted trees shall be guy wires. trees shall be 24 -inch supported with stakes or b. Shrubs shall be minimum 5allon size. When planted to serve as a hedge or screen, shrubs shall be planted with 2 to 4 feet spacing, depending on the plant species. c. Depending on the plant material groundcover shall be generally spaced at a maximum of 6 to 8 inches on -center. When used as groundcover, minimum one gallon size shrubs may be planted at 18 to 24 inches on -center. d. All plant material shall be installed in a healthy, vigorous condition typical to the species. (3) Site Landscaping a. All areas not covered by buildings or structures, enclosed for storage or used for paved walks, drive- ways or parking shall be landscaped. Trees should be planted at a quantity approximate to one tree for each 200 square feet of landscaped area when the site can accommodate such. Trees may be plantedingroupiw. b. Landscaping including trees, shall be provided adjacent to structures and along interior property lines when the site can accommodate such; trees may be planted in groupings. c. Along fences or walls that are visible from the street, a combination of trees, hedges, shrubs, and vines, shall be planted on the street -facing side. d. Areas used for loading, refuse, storage and equipment shall be screened with a combination of walls and landscaping. (4) Irrigation A permanent sprinkler irrigation system suf- ficient to cover all planted areas shall be provided and shall be specified on all submitted plans. Automatic controls are re- quired on all irrigation systems. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (5) Maintenance Landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and healthy condition. This shall include proper trimming, mowing of lawns, weeding, removal of litter, ferti izing, regular watering and replacemnt of diseased or dead plants. (i) Signs. The sign sizes on the hotel shall not exceed that currently permitted by the HBCC. Signs shall be allowed as follows: (1) A monument sign not to exceed eight feet in height shall be permitted on the Subject Property adjacent to Hermosa Avenue; (2) Four temporary construction signs not to exceed 200 square feet shall be permitted on the site during construction. Total construction sign square footage shall not exceed 800 square feet; (3) Such additional square footage of signage allowed by the HBCC which may be placed at any point upon any of the facades of the Project Improvements. (4) All signs shall be reviewed by the Building Director for compliance with HBCC Section 28-Al2. (j) Utilities. All utilities. shall be underground. (k) Sprinklered Building. The Project, including all structures, will be sprinklered. Said installation will be in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code, 1985 edition. -(1) Trash Storage. Trash storage areas shall be screened from the view of neighboring residential uses and shall be conveniently located for service vehicles. Enclosures shall be constructed out of the same material as the building. A hose bib at trash location shall be provided for cleaning of area. There shall be ten square feet of refuse enclosure per 1000 square feet of net floor area of building or structure, except that no enclosure shall have dimensions less than eight feet by eight feet. Trasharea may be reduced in size if it is shown that all trash can beroperly accommodated. The enclosure shall have a concrete slab floor sloped to drain, minimum six-foot high masonry walls, and a minimum six-foot wide opening with self - latching opaque panel gates. The refuse enclosure shall be lo- cated to provide access without interfering with parking and cir- culation. Preferably, the trash location shallnot be visible from adjacent property, and/or from public right-of-ways unless no other location exists. (m) Loading Areas. Loading, unloading and service activity areas shall be screened to minimize the view from and noise to neighboring residential uses and located for convenient use by service vehicles. (n) Noise Buffering. To minimize noise to neighboring residential uses, the ground floor windows facing -9- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 15th Street shall be non-operable and hotel rooms with operable windows facing 15th Street shall not be used as hospitality suites. (o) Site Design. (1) Open and landscaped areas shall be provided around the building and shall highlight primary entrances; (2) Parking shall be located to provide safe and convenient access to uses and shall contribute to an overall circulation pattern. Section 9.622. Public Transit The developer shall institute an airport shuttle for hotel guests. Section 9.623. Bicycle Parking The developer shall provide not less than one hundred permanently mounted bicycle parking stalls. Bike stalls shall be in conspicuous locations and adjacent to the Strand. Section 9.624. Severability If any part or provision of this Specific Plan, or any application thereof, is held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision or application will not be deemed valid, except to the extent permitted by law, but all other provisions or applications shall continue in full force and effect. T/pcorbilt to ITTEENT11 1IERMOSA AVENUE 1 1 1 1 1 1 - -EE •. OUR TIENT( 1 STR THIRTEENTH PUBLIC �J i ESTAURANT W/VIEW r ti PATIO 'UBLLC MEETING 1 CAFE ROOMS , BEACH FRONT • PLAZA GROUND LEVEL HERMOSA BEACH HOTEL V 1I8InX3 IJ r I -E LIT771 t R E Ji} 3-- 3- EF 1L9JPUB j r--F-PUBLIC OCEAN VIEW • REFRESHMENT DECK J Yi____._____ • • • MEZZAMNE LEVEL • HERMOS. MAO 1 HOTEL ZI8IlX8 • -F t. i :1 GUEST ROOMS 53` 9`l • 1 THIRD & FOURTH LEVEL 11 4 • IOPT WOFi HERMOSA BEACH HOTEL V J i iUXB •=I• • • • • .7r--•-• 4.111It I PUBLIC PARKING AREA PUBLIC PARKING AREA r• • 1' 1 SUB -GRAM PARKING - HERMOSA BEACH, • HOTEL V IIEIIIIX2 PIN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 84-751 A SPECIFIC PLAN AREA FOR AREA COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE BILTMORE SITE. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on July 12, 1988 and made the following Findings; A. The attached ordinance will help achieve the goals, policies, and programs of the General Plan and Local Coastal Program; B. The amended ordinance will more adequately regulate the use of the subject property; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain the attached ordinance amending ordinance 84-751 a Specific Plan Area generally between 15th and 13th Street, and the Strand and Hermosa Avenue. Section 1. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Section 2. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage .and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 •11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM, ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 84-751 A SPECIFIC PLAN AREA TO REGULATE DEVELOPMENT GENERALLY IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA BETWEEN 15TH AND 13TH STREETS AND THE STRAND AND HERMOSA AVENUE. ARTICLE 9.6, CHAPTER 1, SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 1 Section 9.611. Authority This Specific Plan is an instrument for implementing the Local Coastal Program ("LCP") and General Plan of the City, pursuant to Article 8, Chapter 3 of the State Planning and Zoning Law (Cal. Gov't. Code Sec. 65450 et seg.). Section 9.612. Location This Specific Plan regulates the "Biltmore Site" and adjacent lots (the "Subject Property") bounded on the west by the Strand, partially bounded on the north by Fifteenth Street, partially bounded on the east by Hermosa Avenue and on the south by Thirteenth Street as described in the Basic Concept Drawings attached hereto as Exhibit "A." Section 9.613. Area Description The Subject Property encompasses 2.99 acres of topographically flat land, consisting of 2.33 acres of vacant land and .66 acres upon which one and two .story residential/commercial buildings now exist. The Subject Property is located near the Central Business District ("CBD") and adjacent to the Strand providing an opportunity for commercial/recreational development that could contribute significantly to the economy of the City and the revitalization of the commercial district. Section 9.614. Basic Concept Drawings The Basic Concept Drawings attached hereto as Exhibit "A" depict the boundaries of the Subject Property,—the location of the Project and the alterations proposed to existing streets. Exhibit "A" also indicates the basic design concept for the Project incorporating the objectives, policies, standards and regulations herein. Section 9.615. Purpose The purpose of this Specific Plan is to set forth design principles and development standards for a hotel, conference center, parking facilities, Garden Plaza *and other ancillary uses (the "Project") that will enhance the commercial and recreational potential of the Subject Property while achieving the goals, policies, and objectives articulated in the General Plan and the LCP. This Specific Plan shall provide the following: - 12- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (a) Establish objectives, policies, regulations, development standards, and review criteria for the Project on the Subject Property; (b) Preserve the unique coastal character of the area and assure that development of the Subject Property will comply with California Coastal Act policies, promote local economic stability, and meet the needs of local residents and beach visitors; and (c) Implement the goals, objectives, and policies identified in the Local Coastal Program Element of the General Plan. Section 9.616. Specific Plan Development Objectives Proper development of the Subject Property is critical to the economic and environmental future of the City, therefore, the major objectives of this Specific Plan are as follows: (a) Assure the development of the Project in a manner consistent with the Hermosa Beach City Code ("HBCC") and the scale and location of the Subject Property; (b) Assure coastal access for visitors and residents; (c) Assure adequate parking; (d) Minimize adverse impacts of the Project on neighboring residential uses, especially as they relate to traffic, noise and visual effects; (e) Establish a long range and continuing source of revenue for the City; (f) Facilitate the safe and convenient flow of traffic in the area; and (g) Provide for permitted uses which are complementary to the Project use and to the City's CBD. Section 9.617. Area Development Policies J To effectively achieve the foregoing objectives, the following policies shall be applied to the design and construction of the Project: (a) Project unity and identity shall be achieved through the careful siting of building and parking areas, the development of an effective circulation system, the coordination and control of building design, landscaping, lighting, signing, and similar features. (b) The design and control of pedestrian and vehicular circulation shall provide safe and convenient access to the Project. (c) The standards of development set forth in Section 9.621 below shall be applied' Vo realize the unique potential of -13.- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 �11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the area and to provide for a high quality Project, compatible with commercial uses while maintaining a desirable environment for surrounding residents. Maximum flexibility, consistent with the goals, objectives and policies expressed herein, shall be allowed to encourage imaginative design and development. Section 9.618. Primary Permitted Uses (A) Hotel; Section 9.619 Ancillary Permitted Uses (A) Conference Center facility; (B) Parking facilities; (C) Compatible Uses: (1) Food related: a. Restaurant, excluding drive-ins; b. Delicatessen; c. On-site alcoholic beverage sales, including bars and cocktail lounges, provided such uses are a part of a bona fide eating place or hotel (subject to all applicable standards of Article 10, Conditional Use Permit Standards, and Article 20, Penalty, of the Hermosa Beach Zoning Ordinance). The City shall have the right during business hours, upon 15•days notice, to inspect the books and records of the applicant to determine..if gross sales of alcohol beverages meet all Hermosa Beach code requirement. Upon request at the inspection, the owner/operator of the business shall also submit to the City copies of all records submitted to the State Board .of Equalization for the purposes of verifying the applicant's books and records, with the understanding that these reviews are confidential; (2) Entertainment and recreation related: a. Dancing; b. Live entertainment; c. Amplified and recorded music; d. Audio/visual entertainment; e. Health and fitness facility; (3) Service related: a. Automotive rental agency storage of not more than three rental vehicles (excluding repair and/or servicing); -14.- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 �11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 cleaning; guest only; b. Apparel repair, alteration and c. Barber and beauty shop; d. Shoe repair and polishing; e. Ticket sales agency; f. Travel agency; g. Health and fitness facility for hotel (4) Retail related: a. Apparel shop; b. Art gallery; c. Bookstore; d. Camera shop; e. Candy, nut and confectionary shop; f. Cigar store; g. Drugstore; h. Florist; i. Greeting card shop; j. Jewelry shop; k. Specialty gift shop; 1. Stationery store; (D) Other uses not permitted above may be determined by the Planning Commission to be permitted uses if they meet the following criteria:' (1) The proposed use will not create circumstances, effects or conditions which are undesirable, more intensive or substantially different than the other uses permitted herein. Factors to consider are traffic, hours of operation, equipment, and the nature of the use; (2) The proposed use will be compatible with the uses permitted herein; (3) The proposed use is similar in scope, purpose, and operation to the uses permitted herein; (4) The proposed use will promote the objectives stated herein; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 prohibited. Section 9.620. Prohibited Uses All uses are prohibited unless provided for and authorized herein. Under no circumstance shall the following uses be permitted as principal or accessory uses: (a) Residential dwellings, including trailer and mobile home parks; (b) Churches, Synagogues, temples and other uses primarily devoted to religious worship; (c) Educational institutions; (d) Drive-in restaurants; (e) Billboards; (f) Hospitals, sanitariums, homes for the aged and other similar uses. Section 9.621. Subject Property Development Standards To achieve the foregoing objectives, the following standards shall be applied to the development of any Project on the Subject Property: (a) Intensity. Development of the Subject Property shall comply with the following: (1) The above grade lot coverage of the Project shall not exceed 60% of the Subject Property; (2) The number of guest rooms shall not exceed (5) The proposed use is not otherwise 250; (3) The Conference Center facility shall not exceed an area of 7,000 square feet. (b) Building Height. The Project shall have no more than four (4) stories and the building height shall not exceed 40 feet. (c) Parking. The Project shall provide not less than 420 subterranean parking spaces. Provision for striping, parking for the physically handicapped, compact spaces., stall design, tandem, turning radii and similar standards shall be as specified in HBCC Appendix A -Zoning. Valet parking shall be required at all times when tandem parking is used. The HBCC provides that in projects that can demonstrate, based on a parking study and parking plan, that opportunities for shared parking are available, the number of parking spaces to be required shall be the number determined by such parking study and parking plan to be needed. The parking study and parking plan prepared in 1984 for a hotel project previously proposed for the Subject Property demonstrated a need for not more than 390 parking spaces. The 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Project shall provide not less than 420 parking spaces, though it is recongnized that it contains 12 less hotel rooms, 1,250 less square feet of assembly area and 1.980 less square feet of entertainment lounge/bar area than the hotel project for which the parking plan and study was prepared. Accordingly, the 420 spaces are determined to be adequate and in compliance with HBCC requirements. (d) Open Space. As indicated on Exhibit "A", the Project shall preserve and enhance open space by providing and maintaining the following: (1) A plaza facing the Strand; (2) An approximately 1/2 acre park for general public use. To the extent permitted by law, no future non -park use may be made of the surface of the park -designated area of the Subject Property unless and until this Specific Plan is amended according to Article 15 Amendments of the zoning ordinance. (e) Architectural Considerations. (1) Compatible architectual treatment shall be carried out on the front, rear and sides of the entire development; (2) Roof. The roof shall be sand -colored; (3) Windows. The use of chrome -colored or mirrored glass shall ehibited. (f) Equipment. Air conditioners, duct work and similar equipment shall not be located on the roof of the building -and shall be screened from public view. (g) Circulation. (1}, Fifteenth Court shall be made one-way eastbound to ensure a circular flow of traffic for service vehicles; (2) There shall be no public pedestrian ingress from 15th Street; (3) There shall be no public pedestrian ingress from Beach Drive between 15th Street and 15th Court. (h) Landscaping. Landscaping and automatic irrigation prepared by a licenced landscape architect shall be provided and made complementary to the Subject Property's coastal location; (1) Guidelines a. Landscaped areas should be planned and designed as an integral part of the project. The type, quantity and placement of plant material should be selected for its struc- ture, texture, color and compptibility with the building design and materials. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 b. Exterior lighting, signs, walls and walkways should also be incorporated as an intergral part of the landscape design. c. Soil, water, sun conditions and other factors should be considered in the choice of specific plant materials. (2) Plant Materials a. Minimum size trees shall be 24 -inch box. All newly planted trees shall be supported with stakes or guy wires. b. Shrubs shall be minimum 5 gallon size. When planted to serve as a hedge or screen, shrubs shall be planted with 2 to 4 feet spacing, depending on the plant species. c. Depending on the plant material, groundcover shall be generally spaced at a maximum of 6 to 8 incbes on -center. When used as groundcover, minimum one gallon size shrubs may be planted at 18 to 24 inches on -center. d. All plant material shall be installed in a healthy, vigorous condition typical to the species. (3) Site Landscaping a. All areas not covered by buildings or structures, enclosed for storage or used for paved walks, drive- ways or parking shall be landscaped. Trees should be planted at a quantity approximate to one tree for each 200 square feet of landscaped area when the site can accommodate such. Trees may be planted in groupings. b. Landscaping including trees, shall be provided adjacent to structures and along interior property lines when the site can: accommodate such; trees may be planted in groupings. c. Along fences or walls that are visible from the street, .a combination of trees, hedges, .shrubs, and vines, shall be planted on the street -facing side. d. Areas used for loading, refuse, storage and equipment shall be screened with a combination of walls and landscaping. (4) Irrigation A permanent sprinkler irrigation systen suf- ficient to cover all planted areas shall be provided and shall be specified on all submitted plans. Automatic controls are re- quired on all irrigation systems. (5) Maintenance Landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and healthy condition. This ° shall include proper trimming, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 mowing of lawns, weeding, removal of litter, fertilizing, regular watering and replacemnt of diseased or dead plants. (i) Signs. The sign sizes on the hotel shall not exceed that currently permitted by the HBCC. Signs shall be allowed as follows: (1) A monument sign not to exceed eight feet in height shall be permitted on the Subject Property adjacent to Hermosa Avenue; (2) Four temporary construction signs not to exceed 200 square feet shall be permitted on the site during construction. Total construction sign square footage shall not exceed 800 square feet; (3) Such additional square footage of signage allowed by the HBCC which may be placed at any point upon any of the facades of the Project Improvements. (4) All signs shall be reviewed by the Building Director for compliance with HBCC Section 28-Al2. (j) Utilities. All utilities shall be underground. (k) Sprinklered Building. The Project, including all structures, will be sprinklered. Said installation will be in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code, 1985 edition. (1) Trash Storage. Trash storage areas shall be screened from the view of neighboring residential uses and shall be conveniently located for service vehicles. Enclosures shall be constructed out of the same material as the building. A hose bib at trash location shall be provided for cleaning of area. There shall be ten square feet of refuse enclosure per 1000 square feet of net floor area of building or structure, except that no enclosure shall have dimensions less than eight feet by eight feet. Trash' area may be reduced in size if it is shown that all trash can be properly accommodated. The enclosure shall have a concrete slab floor sloped to drain, minimum six-foot high masonry walls, and a minimum six-foot wide opening with self - latching opaque panel gates. The refuse enclosure 'shall be lo- cated to provide access without interfering with parking and cir- culation. Preferably, the trash location shall not be visible from adjacent property, and/or from public right-of-ways unless no other location exists. (m) Loadin• Areas. Loading, unloading and service activity areas shall •e screened to minimize the view from and noise to neighboring residential uses and located for convenient use by service vehicles. (n) Noise Buffering. To minimize noise to neighboring residential uses, the ground floor windows facing 15th Street shall be non-operable and hotel rooms with operable windows facing 15th Street shall not be used as hospitality suites. -/9- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (o) Site Design. (1) Open and landscaped areas shall be provided around the building and shall highlight primary entrances; (2) Parking shall be located to provide safe and convenient access to uses and shall contribute to an overall circulation pattern. Section 9.622. Public Transit The developer shall institute an airport shuttle for hotel guests. Section 9.623. Bicycle Parking The developer shall provide not less than one hundred permanently mounted bicycle parking stalls. Bike stalls shall be in conspicuous locations and adjacent to the Strand. Section 9.624. Severability If any part or provision of this Specific Plan, or any application thereof, is held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision or application will not be deemed valid, except to the extent permitted by law, but all other provisions or applications shall continue in full force and effect. T/pcorbilt CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager FROM: William Grove, Director of Building and Safety RE: Biltmore SPA DATE: July 12, 1988 416 In reviewing the proposed ordinance to amend the SPA, I found no mention of replacing lost public parking. As near as I can determine, based on the information available, the proposal will displace 104 spaces in Lot C, 20 spaces in Lot F and 49 parking spaces on 13th Street for a total of 173 public parking spaces. The SPA ordinance indicates that 420 spaces will be provided which reportedly will comply with HBCC requirements although individual use areas are not indicated in the document. Deducting the lost public parking spaces from the total provided results in 247 additional parking spaces for the development. This amount of parking seems totally inadequate for the scope of the proposed development considering the original hotel EIR for a slightly larger project indicated a peak parking demand for the hotel of 447 parking spaces. I believe that Section 9.621 (c) of the proposed ordinance should be amended to delete a specific number and instead require any development to comply with current parking standards. Any public parking spaces lost due to the development should be replaced on site and available to the public. CC: Michael Schubach, Planning Director Joan Noon, Vehicle Parking District Administrator Jim Lough, City Attorney CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager FROM: William Grove, Director of Building and Safety RE: Biltmore SPA DATE: July 12, 1988 In reviewing the proposed ordinance to amend the SPA, I found no mention of replacing lost public parking. As near as I can determine, based on the information available, the proposal will displace 104 spaces in Lot C, 20 spaces in Lot F and 49 parking spaces on 13th Street for a total of 173 public parking spaces. The SPA ordinance indicates that 420 spaces will be provided which reportedly will comply with HBCC requirements although individual use areas are not indicated in the document. Deducting the lost public parking spaces from the total provided results in 247 additional parking spaces for the development. This amount of parking seems totally inadequate for the scope of the proposed development considering the original hotel EIR for a slightly larger project indicated a peak parking demand for the hotel of 447 parking spaces. I believe that Section 9.621 (c) of the proposed ordinance should be amended to delete a specific number and instead require any development to comply with current parking standards. Any public parking spaces lost due to the development should be replaced on site and available to the public. CC: Michael Schubach, Planning Director Joan Noon, Vehicle Parking District Administrator Jim Lough, City Attorney 1 9 July 1988 Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Members of the City Council: This letter is in reference to the proposed merger of lots 79 and 80, Southern California Hall and Marine View Park Tract, at 634-636 Longfellow Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. It is written because I may not be able to attend the City Council meeting on July 12, 1988, when an appeal on this matter is to be taken up. When my wife and I purchased this property in 1967, we did so because of the fact that it consisted of two full size lots and was zoned R-2. At this late date we are being told that the City of Hermosa Beach plans to merge the lots and then down - zone the property to R-1. If these had been odd -shaped lots of small size, perhaps I may have understood and agreed to the proposal. But these are (or were) full-sized legal lots, and it does not seem right to make these proposed changes. It may be legal, but it is just not morally right. Some people in the real estate business and others who are knowledgeable have been consulted about this. The consensus is that this procedure would devalue this property about $45,000. Since I am now retired, there is no way that I will ever be able to make this back. I urge you, members of the City Council, to follow the recommendation of the Planning Commission not to merge these lots. Sincerely yours, (/;;/"" A. E. Stone, Jr. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION s CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FROM: Andrew Perea, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Lot Merger Hearing Supplemental Information DATE: July 5, 1988 The attached letters are from Butch Kuflak, 666 Longfellow Avenue, and Newell B. Kahler, 605 Longfellow Avenue. Mr. Kuflak and Mr. Keller are requesting a continuation of the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision not to merge their lots. Staff is recommending a continuation of their hearings to July 26, 1988 since they will be out of town on July 12, 1988. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION r4L)I7 s,l7tric ( �-� fro uN e iL. APQ£AL 1-0 77-f, e/r7 �ocihJC/ 1-4,e,Pios/9 ,64ll d 7i) /IT, / /c ii,db /a'6-7' /T 96 65'0 ex. //04 (7 4 -A/D g2,119 -/x/ 7€ze./ ar-)ed A14/ I'.vaccl /oc'6/'4 4aveie : 26? ivy/ ft -ss ti iv( A/07 M/r9-( /z .75 f2C-g4,c77- 7171C Juix 12_ intEr-nkt 2:27telt // he o(. / y n et 14.1vvmce3c cauct plarmi alt,.,,.l.l sn...L1 1.0.4/11,1- NTGALI lonst. acLent,A. ksiou,t, Lc,s cra Kij umll L.. WA41L L iLJ iL cst,v1.1 Wil, V;A.vo- zsa wv) tiocki,ciopobre, Ji.. wl\ncvAst x-ww- G�/ e eL coi,,i JCpJ u.4.104.4 M. C J Please advise my attorney, Mark Lowerre, Post Office Box 3642, Manhattan ash. California, 90266, whether or not this request for postponement is granted. if • this request is not granted, he will appear for me. ,°\CU.Aistkii I ( C-11 01.f..1 .• J • July 5, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council July 12,1988 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION NOT TO MERGE LOTS LOCATION/ 605 LONGFELLOW AVENUE ..f!/ OWNER: NEWELL B. KAHLER 634 LONGFELLOW AVENUE A. E. AND BEVERLY STONE 638 LONGFELLOW AVENUE GARRISON AND HELENE FROST 666 LONGFELLOW AVENUE BUTCH KUFLAK 1� 657 30TH STREET SWEE-TECK TAN AND LILLY TAN 645 30TH STREET JOHN W. WOODSLAIR 641 30TH STREET JOHN AND KATHLEEN TIMS, J. KNAPIK 637 30TH STREET CHARLES AND SUSAN LEHMAN 633 30TH STREET CARMEN DOUGHERTY 629 30TH STREET FRANCIS AND MARIE FREITAS INITIATED BY MAYOR ETTA SIMPSON Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council merge the lots. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of June 7, 1988, approved the applicants' request not to merge the subject lots. These lots were heard before the Planning Commission prior to the effective date of the revised lot merger procedures. 1 CONTINUED -- LOT MERGER APPEAL Abstract The Planning Commission decision will allow the property owners to create substandard parcels rather than merging the lots as intended by the Lot Merger Ordinance. Analysis The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in LM 88-4 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. Staff finds these lots to be subject to merger since less than 80% of the block has been split and the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. The property owners were notified of the appeal by certified mail. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt the subject properties from being subject to merger. Additional background and analysis is provided in the attached Planning Commission staff report of June 7, 1988. Attachments 1. Resolution No. 88- 2. PC staff report June 7, 1988 3. PC minutes of June 7, 1988 4. Background a. Memo regarding letters of correspondence b. Appeal of Intent to Merge Lot from Property Owners c. Tax Assessor's Map d. Aerials CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director evin ':. or craft City Manager 2 Respe tfullyubmitted, /1 An w Pere Associate Planner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ON APPEAL THE MERGER OF LOTS COMMONLY KNOWN AS 605 LONGFELLOW AVENUE, 634 LONGFELLOW AVENUE, 638 LONGFELLOW AVENUE, 666 LONGFELLOW AVENUE, 657 30TH STREET, 645 30TH STREET, 641 30TH STREET, 637 30TH STREET, 633 30TH STREET, AND 629 30TH STREET. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on July 12, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following Findings: A. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of June 7, 1988, approved, on appeal from the property owner, the unmerger of the subject lots; B. Section 29.5-19 through 29.5-29 of the Zoning Ordinance perscribes the procedures for the merger of parcels; C. The City Council finds these parcels to be consistent with the criteria for merger: 1. The main structure is sited on contiguous parcels. 2. Not more than 80% of the lots have been unmerged and developed separately. 3. One of the contiguous parcels comprises less than 4000 square feet. 4. The contiguous parcels are held under common ownership. D. The parcels are within the So. California Convention Hall and Marine View Park Tract. Lots Numbers are as follows: 1. 605 Longfellow Ave Lots 59 and 60. 2. 634 Longfellow Ave Lots 79 and 80. 3. 638 Longfellow Ave Lot 81 and 82. 4. 666 Longfellow Ave -- Lots 94 & 95 and W' 10" Lot 96. 5. 657 Longfellow Ave Lots 156, 157 & E' 12.5' Lot 158. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6. 645 30th Street Lots 161 and 161. 7. 641 30th Street Lots 163 and 164. 8. 637 30th Street Lots 165 and 166. 9. 633 30th Street -- Lots 167 and 168. 10. 629 30th Street Lot 169 and 170. E. The merger of these parcels will preserve the cbaracter of the existing neighborhood by maintaining current densities and preserving public on -street parking; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve the merger 605 Longfellow Avenue, 634 Longfellow Avenue, 638 Longfellow Avenue, 666 Longfellow Avenue, 657 30th Street, 645 30th Street, 641 30th Street, 637 30th Street, 633 30th Street, and 629 30th Street. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of July, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY a/ccrsmerg May 24, 1988 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission June 7, 1988 SUBJECT: LOT MERGER HEARING GROUP: LM 88-4 REQUEST: TO MAINTAIN PARCELS AS TWO OR MORE SEPARATE LOTS ADDRESS/LEGAL DESCRIPTION/OWNER/ASSESSOR'S NO.: 605 LONGFELLOW - LOT 59 AND LOT 60, S0. CAL. CONVENTION HALL AND MARINE VIEW TRACT - NEWELL B. KAHLER - 4169027025 634 LONGFELLOW - LOT 79 AND LOT 80, S0. CAL. CONVENTION HALL AND MARINE VIEW TRACT - A.E. AND BEVERLY STONE - 4169031014 638 LONGFELLOW - LOT 81 AND LOT 82, S0. CAL. CONVENTION HALL AND MARINE VIEW TRACT - GARRISON AND HELENE FROST - 4169031015 666 LONGFELLOW - LOT 94, LOT 95 AND W' 10' OF LOT 96, S0. CAL. CONVENTION HALL AND MARINE VIEW TRACT - BUTCH KUFLAK - 4169030022 657 30TH STREET - LOT 156, LOT 157, AND E' 12.5' OF LOT 158, SO. CAL. CONVENTION HALL AND MARINE VIEW TRACT - SWEE-TECK AND LILLY TAN - 4169030016 645 30TH STREET - LOT 161 AND LOT 162, SO. CAL. CONVENTION HALL AND MARINE VIEW TRACT - JOHN W. WOODSLAIR - 4160030019 641 30TH STREET - LOT AND MARINE VIEW TRACT 4169030020 637 30TH STREET - LOT AND MARINE VIEW TRACT - 163 AND LOT 164, SO. CAL. - JOHN AND KATHLEEN TIMS, 165 AND LOT 166, SO. CAL. CHARLES AND SUSAN LEHMAN CONVENTION HALL JOSEPH KNAPIK - CONVENTION HALL - 4169031016 633 30TH STREET - LOT 167 AND LOT 168 , SO. CAL. CONVENTION HALL AND MARINE VIEW TRACT - CARMEN DOUGHARTY - 4169031017 629 30TH STREET - LOT 169 AND LOT 170, SO. CAL. CONVENTION HALL AND MARINE VIEW TRACT - FRANCIS AND MARIE FREITAS - 4169031018 Recommendation To deny the applicants' request to maintain their parcels as two separate lots. Background LOT MERGER GROUP 88-4 -Notification of Intent to Merge Lots mailed on March 10, 1988 -Number of Notices of Intent to Merge Lots mailed - 41 - Number of bearing requests for appeals received - 10 - Number of lots already developed on 25' parcels per block - Longfellow Avenue - 33% 629 - 637 30th Street - 07 641 - 657 30th Street- 5% Analysis The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in LM 88-4 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. 605 Longfellow Ave The parcel is comprised of two 25' by 100' lots. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure is a two unit dwelling. This parcel is located within a General Plan/Zoning inconsistency area. (GP designation - Low Density, zoning R-2) 634 and 638 Longfellow Ave These parcels are comprised of a two 25' by 105.58' lots each.Aerials indicate that the main structures straddle the property lines.. Building records indicate these structures to be two unit dwellings. These parcels are located within a General Plan/Zoning inconsistency area. (GP designation - Low Density, zoning R-2) 666 Longfellow Ave This parcel is comprised of two 25' by 100.58' lots and a 10' by 100.58' portion of an adjacent lot. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure to be a single family dwelling, zoned R-1. 657 30th Street This parcel is comprised of two 25' by 100.58' and .a 12.5' by 100.58 portion of an adjacent lot. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure to be a single family dwelling, zoned R-1. 641 and 645 30th Street These parcels are comprised of two 25' by 100.58' lots each. Aerials indicate the main structures straddle the property line. Building records indicate the structure at 641 30th Street to be a duplex. 645 30th Street is a single family dwelling, zoned R-1. 629, 633, and 637 30th Street These parcels are comprised of two 25' by 105.58' lots each. Aerials indicate the main structures straddle the property line. Building records indicate these structures to be two family dwellings. These sites are within the General Plan/Zoning inconsistency area. (General Plan - low density, zoning R-2). Staff finds these lots to be subject to merger since less than 80% of the block has been split and the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. Staff cannot determine any reasons topt being subject to merger. CONC lots from An•rew Perea !J Associate Plan Michael(Schubach Planning Director Attachments: 1. Lot Merger Letter 1 2. Intent to Merge Lots 3. Requests for appeals 4. Tax Assessor's Map 5. Aerial a/pcsrlm HEARING OF DETERMINATION FOR LOT MERGER GROUP L.M. 88-4 Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated May 24, 1988. Forty-one Notifications of Intent to Merge Lots were mailed on March 10, 1988; ten hearing requests for appeals were received. The number of lots already developed on 25-foot parcels per block are: P.C. Minutes 6/7/88 • Longfellow Avenue, 33 percent; 629-637 30th Street, 0 percent; and 641-657 30th Street, 5 percent. The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in L.M. 88-4 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. 605 Longfellow Avenue: This parcel is comprised of two 25 by 100 -foot lots. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure to be a two -unit dwelling. This parcel is located within a general plan/zoning inconsistency area. The general plan designation is low density, and the zoning is R-2. 634 and 638 Longfellow Avenue: These parcels are comprised of two 25 by 105.58 -foot lots each. Aerials indicate that the main structures straddle the property lines. Building records indicate these structures to be two -unit dwellings. These parcels are located within a general plan/zoning inconsistency area. The general plan designation is low density, and the zoning is R-2. 666 Longfellow Avenue: This parcel is comprised of two 25 by 100.58 -foot lots and a 10 by 100.58 -foot portion of an adjacent lot. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure to be a single-family dwelling, rezoned to R-1. 657 30th Street: This parcel is comprised of two 25 by 100.58 -foot and a 12.5 by 100.58 - foot portion of an adjacent lot. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure to be a single-family dwelling, zoned R-1. 641 and 645 30th Street: These parcels are comprised of two 25 by 100.58 -foot lots each. Aerials indicate the main structures straddle the property line. Building records indicate the structure at 641 30th Street to be a duplex. 645 30th Street is a single- family dwelling, zoned R-1. 629, 633, and 637 30th Street: These parcels are comprised of two 25 by 105.58 -foot lots each. Aerials indicate the main structures straddle the property line. Building records indicate these structures to be two-family dwellings. These sites are within a general plan/zoning inconsistency area. The general plan designation is low density, and the zoning is R-2. Staff finds these lots to be subject to merger since less than 80 percent of the block has been split, and the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. Staff can determine no reasons to exempt these lots from being subject to merger; therefore, staff recommended that the Planning Commission deny the applicants' requests to maintain their parcels as two separate lots. Chmn. Compton asked how staff has determined which lots were to be merged or not. He felt that they should be left alone so that in time the old units will be torn down and new units will replace them. Comm. DeBellis asked whether staff feels the reason some of these lots have two units on them is because they were originally zoned R-2. P.C. Minutes 6/7/88 • Mr. Schubach replied in the affirmative. Hearing opened at 8:55 P.M. by Chmn. Compton. 605 Longfellow Avenue Appellant: Newell B. Kahler Newell Kahler, 605 Longfellow Avenue, Hermosa Beach, opposed the merging of his lots. He stated that he bought the property 26 years ago as R-2 as income property. He stated that there are 28 duplexes on his block and 28 single-family homes. The duplexes are much finer than the homes on the block. Most of the homeowners have been there for many years. He said that this is a beautiful residential street. He handed out photos depicting the street. Mr. Kahler continued by stating that there are no parking problems on this street at all. He felt that the City is not giving full notice of the consequences of the proposed downzoning. He cited an article in the "Easy Reader" edition of March 24, 1988. Mr. Kahler asked whether it would be possible for the people on Longfellow Avenue to petition to become part of Manhattan Beach. Comm. DeBellis asked if a duplex existed at this property when it was purchased 26 years ago. Mr. Kahler replied in the affirmative. Mr. Kahler stated that he will be out of town for six weeks and would therefore be unable to attend that City Council hearing on this matter. _ Chmn.. Compton advised Mr. Kahler to submit in writing a. request to the Planning Department for a continuance explaining that he would be out of town. 634 Longfellow Avenue Appellant: A. E. Stone A. E. Stone, 634 Longfellow Avenue, Hermosa Beach, opposed the merger of his lots. He stated that a decision has already been made on what action to take in regard to these properties. He bought this property in 1967 as two full-sized lots. He felt it is unfair that the City is now saying they are not two full-size lots. He did not feel that anyone in the City has the right to change his zoning without his permission, especially since such an action would be to his detriment. He stated that he has spoken to several realtors, and they all stated that the property would be worth less if the lots were merged. He estimated his possible loss at approximately $45,000. He felt that if the City downzones property, owners should be compensated for their loss. Mr. Stone did not feel that lot mergers would control the density. He stated that families can no longer afford single-family dwellings in the City, so several single working adults move in together in order to make the payments. This creates additional parking problems because of all the extra cars. He continued by discussing at length problems with renters in the area. iv-- P.C. Minutes 6/7/88 Chmn. Compton advised Mr. Stone to make his presentation to the City Council. He noted that the Planning Commission acts only as an advisory body to the Council in this matter. Mr. Stone urged the Planning Commission to recommend that this property not be merged. 638 Longfellow Avenue Appellant: Garrison Frost Garrison Frost, 2900 Tennyson Place, Hermosa Beach, opposed the merger of his lots. He purchased the property ten years ago with the idea of using the property as rental income during his retirement years. This was an attractive piece of property to purchase because there were many available options, such as improving one of the units and having a rental on the property. He felt that this street is very nice, wide, and nicely landscaped. He wanted to improve his property; however, if too many restrictions are placed upon his property, he will seriously consider putting his money and interests elsewhere. Mr. Frost did not feel it is appropriate for the City to change the zoning on people's property. He did not feel this would effectively control density. By losing the number of options available to this property, the number of potential buyers will be diminished therefore reducing the price. Mr. Frost felt that people should be allowed to continue with their dreams just as our forefathers felt should be done. 666 Longfellow Avenue Appellant: Butch Kuflak Butch Kuflak, 666 Longfellow Avenue, Hermosa Beach, opposed the merging of his lots. He felt that this proposal is very unfair. He felt that his neighborhood is based on family living. The action of merging lots would not improve the City. He would rather see a new home than two units. He favored single-family living in the City. He said that he researched the possibility of defining his area with the Planning Department. He stated that there is a mini -block that interrupts the flow of Longfellow from Tennyson to Ardmore. He continued by discussing this breakoff point. There are 19 dwellings on the south side of the street, of which none are on double lots. On the other side of the street, on which he lives, thereare five double lots. Of thirty dwellings, only five are on double lots, or only 20 percent. In other words, 80 percent of the dwellings in the area are not on double lots. Mr. Kuflak stated that he .had planned to split his lots, in which case he would have two 30 -foot lots. This would be greater than 80 percent of the dwellings on the street. He stated that this street has the luxury of alleys on both sides; therefore, this is one of the few streets in town with ample parking. He stressed that this is a very unique street. Mr. Kuflak noted that he has 60 feet of frontage on his property. He did not feel that requiring 40 feet of frontage would eliminate the density problems in the City. Mr. Kuflak noted that he bought this property with the intent of building a new home, but he cannot afford to build one house on a 60 -foot lot; however, two homes on two 30 -foot — < <— P.C. Minutes 6/7/88 lots is within reach. He stated that citizens are not properly informed of changes occurring in the City, noting that he submitted plans in 1986, and he feels he was misinformed by the Building Department in regard to his options at that time. 657 30th Street Appellant: Swee-Teck and Lilly Tan Swee-Teck Tan, 657 30th Street, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission. He disagreed with the staff report and stated that the main portion of his dwelling does not straddle the property line. He stated that the front footage of his house is 62.5 feet; therefore, he actually has two and a half lots. The main body of the house is on one side of the lot; the other side is completely clear. He stated that he has studied the map. The only thing on the other side of the lot is a garage which was converted into a living room and a garage which was added in the rear. Mr. Tan stated that his house is on one lot, and there is an empty lot next to that. All the other houses in the area are on 25 -foot lots. At this time he has no plans to build on the other lot; however, in the future he may want to live in one house and build one on the other lot to sell for his retirement. He felt it is unfair for the City to merge these lots because the options for his property would be diminished. Mr. Tan passed out a drawing of his property. He stated that he purchased this property twelve years ago. He said that he would not be able to afford to build one large house on one merged lot; however, he could afford to build a smaller house. He stated that he did not have enough time to prepare a presentation and he noted that he would like to 'appeal the merger. Chmn. Compton stated that, according to the lot layout plan, this dwelling definitely straddles the property line. He stated that the property line for Lot No. 156 goes • directly, through the dwelling. The house is 26 feet with a four -foot setback. If the lots were configured differently, there might be a different situation where two lots could be created; however, that is not the case here. 645 30th Street Appellant: John W. Woodslair (No one appeared to speak about this property.) 641 30th Street Appellants: John and Kathleen Tims and Joseph Knapik (No one appeared to speak about this property.) 637 30th Street Appellants: Charles and Susan Lehman Sue Lehman, 637 30th Street, Hermosa Beach, opposed the merger of these lots. She did not feel that merger would reduce the density problems in the City. She has owned this property for ten years. Two years ago the property was improved, and a front unit was built, and the rear unit provides income. She stated that there is no parking problem in -(2- P.C. Minutes 6/7/88 0 the area. She felt that the area would be irreversibly changed if the lots are merged. She stated that all of the improvements at her property have been done by permit. 633 30th Street Appellant: Carmen Dougharty Carmen Dougharty, 633 30th Street, Hermosa Beach, opposed the merger. He rents the front duplex. He stated that he is the original owner of the duplex, and the property was purchased solely because of the fact that it provides supplemental income. He stated that the duplexes in the area are maintained very well. He said he has spent a lot of money on improving his property, and he wants to maintain the property as it is. 629 30th Street Appellants: Francis and Marie Freitas (No one appeared to speak about this property) Hearing closed at 9:45 P.M. by Chmn. Compton. Comm. DeBellis asked whether the Planning Commission still has the ability to not merge lots. Mr. Schubach replied in the affirmative. Mr. Lough explained recent Supreme Court decisions regarding the issue of lot mergers. He concluded by stating that the old rules still apply, and the Planning Commission still has the discretion allowed by the former rules. Comm. DeBellis noted, however, that the City Council has appealed those instances where the Planning Commission recommended that lots not be merged. He asked if that will still be the case. Mr. Schubach replied in the affirmative. Mr. Lough noted that they have, all been appealed; however, not all of the decisions have been reversed, nor have all the lots been merged; some have not been merged. Chmn. Compton stated that in cases where there are two units, it makes no sense to him to merge the lots into one single lot. If that is done, the only thing to be accomplished is that the old units will remain for a very, very long time. He questioned how density would be reduced if two units remain on one merged lot. All that can be guaranteed is that the units will remain for a long time and possibly be added onto. When the time comes for those old units to be removed, he felt that two new nice units should be allowed in their place. Comm. Rue concurred with Chmn. Compton's comments about the lots with two units. He commented on the remodeling done by Mrs. Lehman, and he felt that that is the type of thing which should be encouraged in the City. He stated that 30th Street and Longfellow are probably two of the nicest streets in the entire City. He suggested that the City Council reach a compromise in order to allow the type of development such as was done by Mrs. Lehman. He felt that one house in front of the other, maintained in a nice manner, is more appropriate than two 19 -foot houses on 25 -foot lots next door to (3-- P.C. Minutes 6/7/88 each other. Comm. DeBellis noted that some of these properties are in areas of general plan/zoning inconsistencies. He noted that he has walked and driven these streets many times, and it is difficult to differentiate between the homes and duplexes; therefore, he felt that the general plan, rather than the zoning, should be changed in that area. He noted that as recently as two years ago, two units were allowed in this area. He hoped that the Council would take this fact into consideration. MOTION by Comm. DeBellis, seconded by Chmn. Compton, to not merge the properties at: 605 Longfellow; 634 Longfellow; 638 Longfellow; 641 30th Street; 629 30th Street; 633 30th Street; and 637 30th Street because they are all existing two -unit dwellings in an R-2 zone. AYES: Comms. DeBellis, Ingell, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: Comm. Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None MOTION by Chmn. Compton, seconded by Comm. Ingell, to not merge the lots at 666 Longfellow and 657 30th Street, because they can both be developed into two 30 by 100 - foot lots; and that type of development would be consistent and reasonable in the area. AYES: Comms. DeBellis, Ingell, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: Comm. Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None MOTION by Comm. DeBellis, seconded by Comm. Ingell, to recommend to the City Council that, if the lots at 666 Longfellow and 657 30th Street are appealed and are • merged, that they be allowed to be split into two 30 by 100 -foot lots. AYES: Comms. DeBellis, Ingell, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: Comm. Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Comm. DeBellis discussed the property at 645 30th Street and noted that it is a single unit in an R-1 zone. He did not feel that he could support a motion to not merge this particular lot. MOTION by Chmn. Compton, seconded by Comm. Rue, to not merge the parcel at 645 30th Street, based on the fact that the owner requested that they not be merged and on the possibility of development into two 50 by 50 -foot lots accessed off the alley in the front. AYES: Comms. Ingell, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: Comms. DeBellis, Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Chmn. Compton urged all citizens to appear at the City Council hearing on this matter to make their feelings known. --14- P.C. Minutes 6/7/88 4,17 4, /fig VP-14t)/44-4- 772oraevai 7746 ee, cote/ad , 1;f.0-14,41- -/Le) ,ii,i7-2,Arri -64) 671 Yolifri-L4J zsi 6,et Atteei44t) Addian 4.3/, / l SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION s 7 powiatt -rni,4€4,0&L cx„tui_ a„ �-%�ru��u�d fuum � ii SUPPLEMENTX INFORMATION- 6 30 North Raymond Avenue Suite 708 Pasadena, Calif. 91103-3930 James P. Lough Attorney at Law July 6, 1988 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM Telephone (818) 792-4728 (818) 792-4776 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 12, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney RE: Extension of Interim Fee Ordinance and Continuance of Negative Declaration to a Date Certain Recommended Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88- extending the Interim Fire Flow Fee Ordinance No. 88-931. At the May 24, 1988 city council meeting, the city council adopted an interim ordinance which established fees to partially pay for the installation of fire hydrants and their appurte- nances to increase fire safety within Hermosa Beach. The ordinance was extended 30 days on June 14, 1988. This extension ordinance is only effective for a period of 30 days and, in order to continue collection of such fees, the city council must adopt the attached ordinance by a four-fifths (4/5) vote. This is the final extension of the emergency fees. Granting this extension by a four-fifths vote will prevent a large gap in the fee program for residential dwellings from occurring. JPL/gp NOTED: KEVIN B. NORTH 27/SR0712A spectfully ed, City Manager S P. LOUGH, Ci y Attorn TY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. SS AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXTENDING ORDINANCE NO. 88-931 WHICH ESTABLISHES A FIRE FLOW FEE TO UPGRADE FIRE PROTECTION. WHEREAS, the city council held a public hearing on May 24, 1988 and adopted by a four-fifths vote Ordinance No. 88-931 establishing an interim fire flow fee for a period of 30 days; WHEREAS, the city council held a public hearing on June 14, 1988 and adopted an extension of Ordinance No. 88-931 for an additional 30 days; WHEREAS, the city council has the authority under the Government Code to extend said ordinance for a period of 30 days after the initial 30 days; and WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Hermosa Beach is desirous of maintaining a fee system in which developments bear a partial burden of fire protection in relation to the increased fire risks that they have added to the community. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: /// /// 27/ORD23 -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 1. Ordinance No. 88-931 is hereby readopted and extended an additional 30 days from the date of its original expiration. Section 2. The city clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the city council at which the same is passed and adopted. This ordinance shall remain in effect for a period of 30 days after the expiration of the initial 30 -day ordinance. After notice and public hearing pursuant to Government Code Sections 54986 and 54992, as applicable, the city council may extend the interim authority for an additional thirty (30) days. No more extensions may be granted. Section 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the city clerk shall cause this ordi- nance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach. -2- 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3. 14 15 Section 5. Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this ordinance shall be brought within 120 days. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY, 1988. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTO 27/ORD23 -3- PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA July 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of July 12, 1988 APPROVAL OF PRIORITIZED CITY GOALS Recommendation: That the City Council consider public input on the City goals, discuss the prioritization based on the compilation or priority points as submitted by each Councilmember and formally approve the City goals. Background: The City Council has held two recent study sessions with the intent of updating policy goals for the City. These goals are critically important in prioritizing the use of City resources to accomplish the policy directions of City Council. Following our brainstorming, development of goals statements, and prioritization, it is now appropriate to receive public comment on the proposed goals. Upon approval, these goals would then be the major policy direction to staff, subject to periodic review and updating by the City Council. Kevin Northiraft City Manager KBN/ld Attachment CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH GOALS ESTABLISHED 1988 Priority No. 1 IMPROVE CITY FINANCIAL PICTURE Goal: Balance City budget for FY '89-'90. 2 DEVELOP BILTMORE SITE Goal: By January 1, 1989, the citizens will direct the future development of the biltmore site. 3 GROWTH MANAGEMENT/DENSITY REDUCTION Goal: Continue methods designed to reduce density. 4 -tie IMPROVE ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Goal: Complete evaluation of organizational effectiveness by January 1, 1989. - Implement policy whereby policies of the League of California Cities and other cities are utilized first. - City to develop and advise City Council regarding status of records management efficiency and needs. 4 -tie ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS Goal: Review enforcement and assignment of proper enforcement personnel for the laws of the City of Hermosa Beach. 4 -tie COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF GENERAL PLAN Goal: Schedule comprehensive review of various elements of the General Plan to begin January 1, 1989 and be completed by January 1, 1990. - (1) Land use element and (2) circulation element 7 STANDARDIZED PROCEDURES FOR CITY DEPARTMENTS (INSTRUCTIONAL SHEETS). Goal: Develop instructional form on how to get a building permit by January 1, 1989. 8 -tie ADD OPEN SPACE Goal: Acquire Railroad right-of-way by Jan. 1, 1989. 8 -tie COMPLETE INCONSISTENCIES AND LOT MERGERS IN 1988 8 -tie IMPROVE AND ENHANCE RELATIONSHIP WITH SCHOOL DISTRICT Goal: Through ongoing dialogue with the School District, creatively decide how the City can combine the need for preserving and acquiring open space with the School District's need for instructional money. 11 PROMOTE POSITIVE COrMiERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS Goal: Promote quality commercial development. - Develop awards to encourage upgrades. - Enforce fire codes, abate nuisances. - Improve infrastructure in commercial areas. - Ask Chamber of Commerce to review and study in lieu parking fees. - Revise and enhance landscaping in commercial and residential areas by upgrading ordinances. 12 TRAFFIC CONCERNS Goal: Make decision regarding Pacific Coast Highway traffic patterns by January 1, 1989. 13 -tie IMPROVE PUBLIC POLICY PROCESS Goal: Continue to promote public access via town hall meeting, cable, our abundant public noticing, improved press relations (releases and relations). 13 -tie PARK AND RECREATION PROCRAM Goal: Community Resources to audit recreational programming of other cities and League of California Cities toward increasing activities available to Hermosa Beach residents (youths, adults and senior citizens). - Comparison of current programs available in Hermosa Beach to what is available to be completed by January 1, 1989. 13 -tie REDUCE COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL CONFLICTS Goal: Via General Plan review, look at buffer, mixed use, commercial potential. 16 -tie IMPROVE CITY IMAGE/BEAUTIFICATION Goal: Implement and enforce landscape upgrade, nuisance abatement ordinances. - Develop routine for inspection of condition of City owned property toward maintenance of landscape, safety, buildings, etc. - Institute public safety awareness and appreciation thopen house (Police, Fire). Jame 16 -tie INFRASTRUC'UI IMPROVEMENTS Goal: Clear report of conditions of all infrastructure systems to be completed by January 1, 1989. 16 -tie ULTILIZATION OF VOLUNTEERS Goal: Conduct appreciation and recognition ceremony for City Commissioners, volunteers. - Solicit volunteer help and expertise on selected subjects from resources within the community. 2 19 -ti• PARKING CONCERNS Goal: Increase public parking spaces by 130 spaces (Compact spaces/structure). 19 -tie PUBLIC SAFETY Goal: Promote fire prevention to include business inspection and licensing. • Consider cleaner burning fuels for fleet/recommend ways to lower pollution. - Expedite use of forfeiture funds for drug enforcement. 19 -tie MORE COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT/EVENTS Goal: Request Foundation and Community Resources Commission to supply methods to increase community events. 22 CONSIDER ARCHITECTUAL REVIEW Goal: Complete A.S.A.P. 23 STREAMLINING COUNCIL MEETINGS Goal: Implement more expediting procedures for Council meetings. 24 IMPROVE PUBLIC COMMUNICATION PROCESS Goal: City departments to prepare report to City Council providing information on cost, format. etc. toward implementing community newsletter 3 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 5, 1988 Regular Meeting of July 12, 1988 SUBJECT: STATISTICAL DATA ON R-2 ZONED LOTS WITH A POTENTIAL OF MORE THAN 2 UNITS, EXCLUDING REZONED AREAS 2, 9, AND 7. INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation Receive and file report. Background At the City Council meeting of January 26, 1988, the City Council requested that staff investigate the subject matter. At the June 14, 1988 Council meeting it was requested that staff revise its analysis, in light of the recent zone changes. Analysis At this time, the overall number of R-2 zoned lots in the City with the potential to have more than two units per lot is twelve (12). This figure is predicated on the following analysis: All R-2 lots except for those in the multi -use corridor and two other lots, are in non -consistent General Plan/zoned areas. Therefore, the moratorium affects these lots, and the density shall conform with the lower density standards. STATISTICAL INFORMATION ON R-2 LOTS WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR MORE THAN TWO (2) UNITS Total number of R-2 lots under current zoning with the potential of more than two units: 43 Potential number of units exceeding two units on the lots noted above: 45 Total potential number of units on above noted lots: 131 Total number of above noted lots located in GP/Zoning inconsistent areas: 31 Total number of above noted lots in the Multi -Use Corridor with the potential of more than two units: 10 Total number of lots in consistent GP/Zoning areas: 2 Following rezoning, the potential number of units exceeding two units on the remaining lots: 13 - 1 - 9 Following rezoning, the total potential number of units on the remaining lots: 38 Conclusion After reexamining all the R-2 areas, one additional lot within a GP/Zoning consistent area was discovered; this lot would allow three units and has already been developed. Beyond the additional lot noted above, there is no new data to present. Unless the City Council changes its direction in regard to rezoning inconsistent areas, and allows some inconsistent R-2 zoned areas to remain R-2, the number of large R-2 lots which could have more than two units will remain status quo. Attachment 1) Staff report dated Febuary 9, 1988 2) City Council Minutes 6/14/88, 5/24/88, & 2/9/88. CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director Kevin B. Nor craft City Manager A/ccsrR2 2 Respectfully submitted, Assistant Planner 30 North Raymond Avenue Suite 708 Pasadena, Calif. 91103-3930 James P. Lough Attorney at Law July 7, 1988 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUIJ Telephone (818) 792-4728 (818) 792-4776 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 12, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney RE: Proposed Ballot Measures Regarding Biltmore Site and Railroad Right -of -Way Recommended Action: Council to set policy as to whether to place these measures on the November, 1988 ballot. Attached are copies of the two ordinances requested by the City Council for discussion as to placement on the November, 1988 ballot. The first measure involves the trade of the Bilt- more Site, including Lot "C," for the Railroad Right -of -Way. Adoption of this measure by the voters would approve a develop- ment agreement, specific plan, vacation of streets, General Plan amendment to the Circulation Element, and a Greenbelt Acquisi- tion and Exchange Agreement. The agreements and documents are not attached to this staff report since no agreements have been finalized at this point. The second measure involves the rezoning and changing of the General Plan for the Biltmore Site to C-2. Once this is accom- plished, the ordinance requires the City Council to sell the property to the highest bidder. The ordinance does not include the sale of Lot "C." Once the sale is accomplished to the Biltmore Site, discretion to rezone or change the General Plan reverts to the City Council as with other non-governmental property with the City. NOTED: Respectfully sumtted, • v IS P. LOUGH, C ty Attorney 40CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VIN B. NORTHCRAIFT, City Manager 27/SR0712A 1 to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVING A GREENBELT ACQUISITION AND EXCHANGE AGREEMENT, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN, GENERAL PLAN (CIRCULATION ELEMENT) AMENDMENT AND STREET VACATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXCHANGING PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE "ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY" FOR DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS AND PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE "BILTMORE SITE." WHEREAS, the citizens of Hermosa Beach adopted Ordinance No. 87-895, which required the City of Hermosa Beach to nego- tiate and purchase the property commonly known as the "Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe (AT&SF) Railroad Right -of -Way" or "Railroad Right -of -Way," with a first priority being a transaction without the use of bond financing; WHEREAS, the citizens of the City of Hermosa Beach adopted Ordinance No. 88-919, which created a special tax, separate and apart from the General Fund, on utility users in the amount of four percent (4%) for use to purchase the Railroad Right -of -Way; WHEREAS, the citizens of Hermosa Beach find and declare that the Biltmore Site is a valuable commodity which, when exchanged for the Railroad Right -of -Way, acts as a means for acquiring the Railroad Right -of -Way for use as a Greenbelt, Parkland and ancillary uses; 27/ORD24 -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the citizens of Hermosa Beach find and declare that the Biltmore Site is not suitable for park purposes in that it has not been used as a park and is adjacent to a city -owned beach which already provides ample recreational opportunities for visitors; WHEREAS, the citizens of Hermosa Beach find and declare that the Railroad Right -of -Way will provide more recreational opportunities both within and without the Coastal Zone than any potential utilization of the Biltmore Site as a city -owned recreational facility; WHEREAS, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (Santa Fe) is desirous of obtaining developable property in exchange for its Railroad Right -of -Way which it has to develop; WHEREAS, the Development Agreement, Specific Plan and Vacation will allow Santa Fe to develop the Biltmore Site in a manner consistent with the City's General Plan and Local Coastal Plan while providing a significant down payment for the exchange to receive the Railroad Right -of -Way; and WHEREAS, the citizens of Hermosa Beach find and declare that use of the utility users special four percent (4%) tax to finance the remaining obligation will accomplish the purposes of the people without resorting to bond financing. /1/ /1/ 27/ORD24 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. With the adoption of this ordinance, the City of Hermosa Beach enters into the Greenbelt Acquisition and Exchange Agreement which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A" as though fully set forth at this point. Section 2. With the adoption of this ordinance, the City of Hermosa Beach enters into the Development Agreement which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "B" as though fully set forth at this point. Section 3. With the adoption of this ordinance, the Specific Plan, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "C" as though fully set forth at this point, is adopted. Section 4. With the adoption of this ordinance, the General Plan amendment to the Circulation Element, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "D" as though fully set forth at this point, is hereby concurrently approved and adopted. Section 5. With the adoption of this ordinance, the Vacation, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as /// 27/ORD24 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 26 27 Exhibit "E" as though fully set forth at this point, is hereby concurrently approved and adopted. Section 6. In the event that any provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid pr unenforceable, the same shall not affect in any respect whatsoever the validity or enforceability of the remainder of this ordinance. Section 7. This ordinance shall take effect in the manner provided by law. Section 8. Except as herein provided, there shall be no modification, amendment or repeal of this ordinance without approval of the voters of the City of Hermosa Beach. Section 9. This ordinance shall only take effect if it receives a majority vote and also receives more affirmative votes than Ordinance No. 88- . ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: 2 27/ORD24 -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 84-751, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE LAND AREA COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE BILTMORE SITE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AND REQUIRING THE SALE OF THE BILTMORE SITE TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER. WHEREAS, the citizens of Hermosa Beach find that the Biltmore Site is a valuable commodity which, if sold, can be used to acquire portions of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe (AT&SF) Railroad Right -of -Way for use as a Greenbelt, Parkland and ancillary uses; WHEREAS, the citizens of the City of Hermosa Beach find and declare that the Biltmore Site is not suitable for park purposes in that it has never been used as a park and is adjacent to a city -owned beach which already provides ample recreational opportunities for visitors; WHEREAS, the citizens of Hermosa Beach find and declare that the Railroad Right -of -Way will provide more recreational opportunities both inside and outside the Coastal Zone than any potential utilization of the Biltmore Site as a city -owned recreational facility; WHEREAS, the citizens of Hermosa Beach find and declare that it is in the best interests of the City to sell the Biltmore 27/ORD25 -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Site to the highest bidder at a public auction for development as a commercial use that is compatible with the surrounding area; WHEREAS, the highest and best use of the Biltmore Site should be determined by fair and open bidding without special restrictions and encumbrances fixed by the current Specific Plan Area; WHEREAS, the citizens of Hermosa Beach desire to repeal the Specific Plan Area in order to automatically reinstate the C-2 zoning for the area and, along with the accompanying amendment to the General Plan, maintain consistency between General Plan and zoning in that General Commercial Uses entail the same types of usages and meet the goals and purposes of the General Plan for downtown development; and WHEREAS, the citizens of Hermosa Beach further desire to maintain consistency with the neighboring commercial areas by amending the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Commercial Recreational area to General Commercial. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance No. 84-751, as amended, is hereby repealed. The property that is a part of the area, commonly known as the Biltmore Site Specific Plan Area, the legal 27/ORD25 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 description of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A," shall revert to the underlying zone of C-2 (commercial), including the C-2 height limit of thirty- five (35) feet. Section 2. The Land Use Element of the Hermosa Beach General Plan is hereby amended to amend the designation from Commercial Recreational to General Commercial for the properties described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Section 3. The City of Hermosa Beach is directed to sell the Biltmore Site, as described in Exhibit "B" which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Said sale shall be to the highest bidder and conducted in a manner established by the Hermosa Beach City Council. Section 4. In the event that any provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid or unenforceable, the same shall not affect in any respect whatsoever the validity or enforceability of the remainder of this ordinance. Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect in the manner provided by law. Section 6. After sale of the Biltmore Site in the manner specified in Section 3, this ordinance may be amended or repealed by the Hermosa Beach City Council consistent with the California Government Code. 27/ORD25 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1� 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 7. This ordinance shall only take effect if it receives a majority vote and also receives more affirmative votes than Ordinance No. 88- . ATTEST: CITY CLERK 27/ORD25 -4- July 7, 1988 City Council Meeting July 12, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION - Two four-year terms expiring July 15, 1992 Qualifications: Elector of the City of Hermosa Beach. Prohibitions contained in HBMC Sec. 2-29...No person shall be appointed to the Civil Service Board who holds any salaried public office or employment with this city. No person, while a member of the Civil Service Board shall be eligible for appointment to any office or employment with this City. Membership on the Civil Service Board shall automatically terminate upon filing notice of candidacy for an elective office of this City. These seats are presently held by Ted Dalton and Joe Miller who are both eligible for reappointment. Mr. Dalton has served on the Commission since June 23, 1981 and Mr. Miller since June 10, 1986. Copies of their original applications are attached. Recommendation The City Council has two alternatives: 1. To reappoint Ted Dalton and Joe Miller to fill the two four-year terms expiring July 15, 1992. 2. To direct the City Clerk to advertise in the EASY READER for applicants to consider for these vacancies. tld66°3 KA LEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk • Concur: City Manager 120 Name: ONO THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL CO NAME OF COMMISSION 'IBEON T. • (TED) DAMON Address: 529 24th Place, Hermosa Beath, Ca 90254 Home Phone: 213-374-5672 Occupation or Profession:. INSURANCE BOER Name of Employer: NQN70rB & DAIMON INSURANCE AMER Address of Employer: 17707 Crenshaw Blvd, Torrance Business Phone: 213-538-2700 Marital Status: Spouse's Name: BIOGRAPHICAL Married Children: Janice Names •and Ages 26 Date of Birth: January 5, 1932 Place of Birth: It's Angeles, Ca Education: Long Beach State College ('57-'58) Granular: 54th Street School (Los Angeles Col lege (s) Pepperdine College ('50 to '54) Degrees and Titles: B.S. ( e) M.S. (Long Beach State College) (Include names of schools and dates, if applicable) Military Service: U.S. Army ('54 to '56) Honorable Discharge (Branch) Local References: (Optional) Professional: Eric Rafter- Attorney Other: Community Participation and Service: Chamber of Cameros Member (4day Tire Store) Activities and Hobbies: RuaPrise., Old cam, coins -2 - Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? IA order to spm Anti hnpefillly improve our ocumunity. What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission Member? Tin VIP fair and just with all decisions that arise, keeping in mind that the community mew& rrnw first, and set aside any and all personal benefits or disadvantages in those decisions. What are your present civil, fraternal or professional memberships and obligations: imtary Club of Del Alm, South Bay Insurance Agents and Brokers AssO., • Calif & National Associations of Insurance Agents, Do you have any concurrent obligations and responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interests? If so, What are they? Dbnv known Please give a resume of your education, employment, past acticities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission Member: M.S. Qirrentl ommar of insurance brokerage employing 8 people, ..1 owner o - f 4day Tire Stores in Hermosa Beach, Santa . & a total of 25 pa ple. Owner of two commercial buildings in Hermosa Beadh & Private Residence in Hermosa Beach, Church Moderator of Hyde Park Cbaigragational C11urC11 pastpea;Apst of Kiwanis Club of Angeles Mesa Mos Angeles) How long have you lived in Hernosa Beach? Comments: • March, 1975 Signed: Date: Received: ofr THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL COMMISSION NAME OF COMMISSION CLQ[ !+01Ge. Name: OIe, "474/ / Address : __ L9PBr 4,/eAe Occupation or Profession: Name of Employer: Address of Employer: 02 ) e .�ir , . / No/ Burliness Phone: 407•.iaTS BIOGRAPHICAL Home Phone: hilaalvaits IAr d4i / rcr7 C2 37y-1-2yy Marital Status: /?)rt,e,1044 Spouse's Name: 1?1,4,4mLe^._ Children: /41: c hai/e 2 (Names and Ages) Date of Birth: 12/11fry EDUCATION Place of Birth: St. C4( IND Elementary School: Jk , , (Iµ) College .(s) : S . lidgrou -MA) g4 High School: /K:AAt .L, tyjj GL G.h . J, • pf,4- Degrees and Titles: f[as/ems tPg /ii. A lw,�,Jl w1 - £4. LA,..l, /7(3 (Inc de names of schools and dat , if applicable Local References: (Optional) Rtelii.o.d p.6 77q. - 1762 - Professional: `% %Ns" 4,D7.9y Other: Community Participation and Service: /jam p Activities and Hobbies: Sk, ��;�, (�, 1 Lpawoo ea. -2 - Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? j' Wo keJ j 3 40billAS i / C141.a46 464E el:0,1 Se, Jict GIS a. ,PC.0U0c e,Q s^."140► 9. ,vpWr& t do you feel site the duties and responsibilities of a Commission Memb€ RWlrtJ.Icor. cisest flak j / 0,40/00; fli ove• ,i��4 :eS c J 9/bI.t4e44Is1 St4e4,4.1c Z Atus./'*f What are your present civil, fraternal or professional memberships and obligations? /L,a_ Do you have any concurrent obligations and responsibilities which 'could be construed as a conflict of interests? If so, what are they? 4i/Le- Please give a resume of your education, employment, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission member. 5e fe s w, c. How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? s6 "ce. Opprif Comments: Atia Ad" 4;e raw4 i .)11144Z (C/Sp, .0 Oda, 1.1L14 . '— !,t p.. dss& eiNtimi‘ .� 4.41A4,‘AU AdliTork 131A, 417,C011144 416 60101• W4L4J. Ata4t� Signed: 7Llkote.„_ - v • gA7 CIA0.4.40.90.:, 90.:• a. Mort �it,1.�.,. Date: �8'6 0114..41.4"..,= Received: JOSEPH E. MILLER 1905 MONTEREY BLVD HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 (213) 607-5555 CAREER OBJECTIVE Position utilizing administrative, interpersonal and research skills in the field of human resource management. EDUCATION i ST. JOHN'S UNIVERSITY, Collegeville, Minnesota 3.76 GPA Bachelor of Arts, Magna Cum Laude, December 1976 Majors: Philosophy and Sociology UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, Denver, Colorado Masters Degree In Public Administration December, 1983 EXPERIENCE SUMMARY HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY LOS ANGELES,, CA 3.92 GPA LABORATORY ADMINISTRATOR 1984 - PRESENT Perform the following duties for a technical laboratory of approximately 200 engineers: assist in manpower forecasting based on new contract awards and current contract performance, draw up necessary paperwork and monitor procurement of laboratory capital resource items, assist in short and long range budget planning, handle facilities requests and problems, security representative for DoD contracts, and interface with other service organizations throughout the company to satisfy contract requirements. STATE OF COLORADO PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATOR II COLORADO 1981 -1984 Hired as Personnel Analyst A and was promoted to Director of Personnel for an agency of 650 employees within three years. The duties of this position include: recruitment and selection of new employees, administering employee classification and compensation system, responsible for overall operation of the employee performance planning and appraisal system, performed examination review and development involving computerized psychometric analysis, and responsible for operation of the formal grievance procedure within the agency. OONTRi cTNG CORFORATION OF AMERICA STAFF SPECIALIST DENVF.R,OOLORADO 1980 -1981 I Administrative position responsible for recruiting, selecting and training college -level instructors; curriculum development; and financial budgeting on a Federal training contract. The contract covered a six state region and required maintaining an extensive documentation system to measure conformity to federal regulations. DEPENDABLE CRAFTSMEN BUSINESS PARTNER L06 ANCES, CALIFORNIA 1979-1980 Owned and operated a small constuction and remodeling company, as well as managed and maintained a 16 unit apartment complex. Scheduled sub -contractors and coordinated completion and delivery dates to customer satisfaction. VISTA DEL MAR CHILD-CARE WORKER LOS ANGELES, CAUFORNIA 1978 -1979 Head of child-care staff in Price cottage. Responsibilities included: providing residential treatment setting for eight emotionally disturbed youths, coordinating and interfacing with medical and government agencies, and coordinating treatment planning with social workers and psychologists. CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH ASSOCIATE ST. CLOUD, MINNESOTA 1975 -1977 PUBUCATION ACTIVITIES REFERENCES Projects Induded: formulating and implementing a process of citizen participation in determining community development priorities, evaluating community education programs, conducting a library needs assessment, project evaluation of Law Enforcement Assistance Association Conference, and conducting a victimization study of a rural Minnesota community. Fifth Avenue - A Path Through St. Cloud's History, 1977 Steam's County Historical Society, St. Cloud, MN Scuba diving, skiing, surfing, camping and hunting. Available upon request July 6, 1988 Ms. Etta Simpson Councilmember, City of Hermosa Beach 651 25th Street Hermosa Beach, Ca SUBJECT: Myrtle Avenue View Protection. Dear Ms. Simpson, Two months ago, while considering the downzoning re , the council recognized that a potential view obstructs was being created on Myrtle Avenue. Specifically, the east side of the 2400 block of Myrtle is now R-1 while the west side is R-2. No lots are big enough for multiple units. During the public hearings, several of my neighbors and I addressed the council on the height and setback disparity between these adjacent areas. During this hearing, several council members expressed concern about this disparity and suggested special staff actions to address the problem. I suggest that it is now time to put your concern into action! A contractor has just purchased the vacant lot at (approximately) 2461 Myrtle, and I assume will soon apply to build a structure to the maximum allowable standards. It would seem a'ate that, if standards for the block are soon to change, placed on building in the area under study. I believe t ere is precedent for such an action. During the above mentioned hearing, two areas of review were suggested: (1) rezoning the area R-1 consistent with surrounding areas and (2) changing how height is measured on sloping lots. Implementation of both changes would be the most effective manner to protect the views of residents on the east side of Myrtle. Changing the height measurement method would, of course, be applied to the entire city. Currently there are no high structures on this block. Immediate action is required if we are to avoid a single building in the block to be built at today's standards while future buildings will be new s an ards. Your understanding and prompt action will be appreciated. I would be pleased to discuss this issue with you by phone or in person, individually or in front of the council. Sincerely, Steve Peterson 2460 Myrtle Avenue Hermosa Beach, Ca 3754397 Q076%74 t, i'f (O M; ri a 12b ,rte Ai #fen 4 ,r,� fon. na efeestere? 4166001m9 omIO#rer‘klT 02 It . 1 ?. Y W.1.1 , g \‘4.1.„, 1\kaAA.,Left4- AL C.:49 Ctiv-va Ik-,exvtAsle2extz.L. 40- vtre4AA_ clo-urK- yvta eJLTenti -tVc A,-tair-.&.-tle 01, wArai._ , vak, -rASZA ,AraL- tsv. tag- et.44. -MUHL- rrh-gi +aka Ca4.t ,01,‘ Ctiaialdt A1/4L aPAZL tte,18-44, uin.crz. tyt aot. - ;\-.QAAA.4-0-1,2EL/20A. Ca,, 12b