Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/28/88ManIs actions are the picture book of his creeds." -Emerson ,,L04) AGENDA PtY/ REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 28, 1988 - Council Chambers, City Hall Planning Commission interviews - 5:30 p.m. Closed Session - 6:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR Etta Simpson MAYOR PRO TEM Jim Rosenberger COUNCILMEMBERS Roger Creighton Chuck Sheldon June Williams CITY CLERK Kathleen Midstokke CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY James P. Lough All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEE: Devin Guzman, Police Officer CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar or within the jurisdiction of the Council not elsewhere considered on the agenda may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the item is called. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are request- ed to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) (a) (e) (f) (h) (i) Recommendation to approve minutes the City Council held on June 14, Recommendation to approve Demands Nos. through of regular meeting of 1988. and Warrants inclusive. Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Recommendation to receive and file the monthly financial reports for May, 1988. 1) Expenditure Report 2) Revenue Report 3) Treasurer's Report Recommendation to authorize City Manager to sign exten- sion of contract with Self Insurers Service, Inc. for third party administration of the City's Workers' Com- pensation claims. Memorandum from Risk Manager Robert Blackwood dated June 21, 1988. Recommendation to take a legislative advocacy position urging enactment of AB 3063 which requires the Depart- ment of Motor Vehicles to establish a pilot program to collect parking penalties regardless of whether a vehi- cle is transferred. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated June 9, 1988. Recommendation to approve outstanding employee program. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat- ed June 20, 1988. Recommendation to receive and file report on needs as- sessment study for City Hall space requirements (CIP 88- 609). Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 7, 1988. Recommendation to deny claims and refer to City's Claims Administrator the claims of: 1) Brian Sullivan, 1824 Manhattan Avenue, represented by Charles Eric McCurdy, Atty, 10960 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1808, LA 90024, filed June 13, 1988 - alleged injury to ankle and foot due to irregular sidewalk; 2) Jeff Jordan, 2450 Via Campesina, Palos Verdes Es- tates, CA 90274, filed June 14, 1988 - alleged bicycle injury due to firehose on Strand; 3) Torrance Nissan, 20710 Hawthorne Blvd., Torrance, CA 90503, filed June 16, 1988 - alleged vehicle damage by city equipment. 4) Hap Jacobs, 2224 Thorley Place, Palos Verdes Es- tates 90274, filed June 20, 1988 - alleged damage by truck to house and basketball hoop at 650 Beach Drive. (i) (1) Recommendation to approve request for 30 day extension of temporary appointment - Police Records Administrator. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert A. Blackwood dated June 20, 1988. Recommendation to authorize disposal of firearms in ac- cordance with Section 12028.0 of the California Penal Code. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wis- niewski dated June 20, 1988. Recommendation to grant a Negative Declaration for or- dinance establishing fire flow fees. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach date June 21, 1988. (m) Recommendation to approve request to reconsider caretak- er unit in the Manufacturing zone. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated June 23, 1988. (n) Recommendation to approve Project Touch lease agreement at Community Center. Memorandum from Community Resour- ces Director Alana Mastrian dated June 20, 1988. Recommendation to receive and file Child Abuse Monthly Report. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated June 21, 1988. Recommendation to approve modification of request from Group Dynamics, Inc. to change summer volleyball tourna- ment from a Women's Pro -Volleyball Tournament to a 6 - Person Tournament. Memorandum from Community Resources Coordinator Mary Rooney dated June 23, 1988. Recommendation to approve award of bid for excess work- ers' compensation insurance. Memorandum from Risk Man- ager Robert A. Blackwood dated June 22, 1988. (r) Recommendation to approve a new not to exceed cost for sanitary sewer design (CIP 87-405) for Harris & Associ- ates in the amount of $50,227. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 22, 1988. (s) Recommendation to approve South Bay Corridor Steering Committee Joint Powers Agreement and approve membership fee of $100 to be appropriated from Prospective Expendi- tures. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 23, 1988. ***************************************************************** MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING: After the City Clerk has read the title to any resolution or or- dinance on tonight's agenda, the further reading thereof be waived, reserving and guaranteeing to each Councilmember the right to demand the reading of any such resolution or ordinance in regular order. ***************************************************************** (0) (q) 2. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (a) ORDINANCE NO. 88-932 - AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A FIRE FLOW FEE TO UPGRADE FIRE PROTECTION AND TO ASSIST CON- STRUCTION PROJECTS TO MEET UNIFORM FIRE CODE REQUIRE- MENTS. For adoption. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 88-933 - AN ORDINANCE REPEALING LEGALLY INCONSISTENT AND SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE ORDINANCES FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE. For adoption. (c) ORDINANCE NO. 88-934 - AN ORDINANCE ORDERING CERTAIN CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED AND MAINTAINED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1988. For adoption. (d) A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP #18895 FOR A FOUR -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1550 LOMA DRIVE. For adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 20, 1988. (e) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1-7.3 "NOTICE TO APPEAR - TIME" OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE. For introduction. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated June 14, 1988. (f) A RESOLUTION TO RECYCLE TAPE RECORDINGS OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS. For adoption. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated June 21, 1988. (g) A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING A PROMPT ELECTION ON THE QUES- TION OF INCORPORATION OF THE PROPOSED CITY OF MALIBU, CALIFORNIA. For adoption. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated June 23, 1988. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. (k) Recommendation to receive and file status report on City Hazardous Waste Management Program and County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated May 17, 1988. (Con- tinued by Councilmember Williams from 5/24/88 and 6/14/ 88 meetings.) 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS 5. RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE ALTERNATIVE HOURS OF OPERA- TION FOR CITY HALL OFFICES. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated May 16, 1988. (Con- tinued from 5/24/88 and 6/14/88 meetings.) PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 6. REZONE OF AREA 7 FROM R-2 TO R-1 OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY CITY COUNCIL AND ADOPT AN EN- VIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 21, 1988. 7. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD "ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, GRADES K-8, SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT" TO THE R-1 PERMIT- TED USE LIST AND A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 20, 1988. 8. TEXT AMENDMENT TO AMEND OR REPEAL BILTMORE SITE S.P.A. ORDINANCE NO. 84-751 WITH PROPOSED ORDINANCE FOR INTRO- DUCTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 22, 1988. 9. HEARING TO REVIEW DELINQUENT REFUSE CHARGES FOR CONSID- ERATION OF PLACING SAID CHARGES ON THE TAX ROLLS AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT (WITH RESOLUTION). Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated June 16, 1988. 10. PROPOSED RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 82-4524 IN- CREASING THE PARKING PERMIT FEES. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated May 17, 1988. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 11. REPORT ON STATUS OF STUDY OF PARKING REMOVAL ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BETWEEN 3 P.M. AND 7 P.M. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 6, 1988. 12. BALLOT MEASURE CONFIRMING BUSINESS LICENSE TAX INCREASES SINCE AUGUST 31, 1985. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated June 20, 1988. 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) Recommendation for Special Meeting at 6 p.m. on July 5, 1988 to conduct Closed Session on real estate negotia- tions. (Oral report) 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Status report re. railroad right-of-way. (Reserved on agenda in case there is new information to report.) (b) Ballot issues. (Reserved on agenda in case there is new information to report.) 5 15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Vacancies - Boards and Commissions Planning Commission - 2 Commissioners for terms ending June 30, 1992. ADJOURNMENT CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. / CITY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by visitor/users; led.'by a City Council which accepts a stewardship role for communLty resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers 1 TSE'HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach bas the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager, operating through the entire city staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Hearings Hearings are held on otber matters of public importance for which there is no legal requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of the City Council may place items on 'the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member"after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority Is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business district. IN OF THE E F HE T Hermosa :each, California held on Tuesday, June hour of 7:58 P.M. of the City of 1988 at the CLOS_4 4E§SIQN - 6:33 p.m. - pursuant to Government Code SectiOn 54956.9(a) to discuss Qotanda._,y. _ City„ of HgrmQaa. Beach,_. Gaskampe v. Cit of Her osa B acb Pantusco v. t •f Hermes :each a d Hermosa Beach Element -r choo District . C t of H rmosa each, and the purchase of real property regars ng the city owned ots at 2nd and 3rd Street, and negotiating instructions on the Railroad right-of-way and Biltmore discussion with A.T.& S.F. R01 L . CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson Absent: None PL1QG OF. A UT NCE - Councilmember Chuck Sheldon• TOLL _CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson Absent: None INCLINATIONS,: Commendation for Redondo Union High Distinguished Schools Award National Flag Day, June 14, 1988 • JOINT PRESENTATION�BY,COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION AND COMMU, TYCE,TER FOUNDA ION. RE. PURPO AND OBJECT V S 'F BO H IG.:NIEATIQNS, A wr tten and ora presentation was made by Com- munity Resources Director Alana Mastrian, Community Resources Commission Chairman Richard Reznichek, and Community Center Foun- dation President George Schmeltzer. School's ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM. CLOSED, SESSION City Attorney Lough announced the dismissal of Pantusco_ys,,.City, of,Hermosa.Beach by the Plaintiff. SITIEEff COMMENTS Michael Flaherty, Chief Union Steward, Teamsters 911 - spoke in favor of item 11, extension of the 4/10 City Hall schedule. 1. CONSENT CALE[iDAR Oct on: To approve Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (p) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for further discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (d) Simpson, (g) Rosenberger, (h) Sheldon, (k) Williams, (1) Sheldon and (o) Williams and noting a NO on (p) by Williams. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. la 1 - Minutes 6-14-88 a. Recommendation to. approve. minutes 1) Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on May 19, 1988. 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on May 24, 1988. (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and_Warrants Nos. 26445, 26589 through 2659 inclusive and 26598 through 26742 inclusive noting voided Warrants Nos. 26602 through 26605 inclusive and 26656. (c) Recommendation to, receive. and file, Tentative. Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation.to receive, and. file monthly investment report f_or May,,1988. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated June 6, 1988. Addressing the Council on this item was City Treasurer Brutseh who answered questions regarding investments the city had in two savings and loans which were taken over by the government. Proposed. Act on The City of.Hermosa Beach does not deposit any monies in institutions that have been as- sumed or taken over by federal regulators because of deficiencies in their operations rendering them insolvent. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. Motion withdrawn. Action: To receive and file, with the understanding that the City Treasurer will get back with information regarding the financial impact of the new proposed policy. Motion Creighton, second ,Simpson. So ordered. (e) Recommendation to request. funds from the County Sanita- tion District in,order to_determine public interest pro- gram goals, recovery and marketing_ potential and to per- form a_preliminary economic analysis of aCity recycling program. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated June 7, 1988. (f) (g) Recommendation to_aecept_work as complete - Pier ground- ing repairs,(CIP.85-203I., authorize staff. to. release $27, 329 Cashiers Check submitted by Parker. Diving, Ser- vice in lieu,of Labor.and_,Materials and FaithfulsPerfor- manceBonds, and authorize staff to file Notice Of Com- pletion. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antieh dated May 31, 1988. Recommendation to receive and file review of tennis court operations at the Community Center., Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated June 6, 1988. - 2 Minutes 6-14-88 (h) Action: To continue this item awaiting further informa- tion, including overall costs, options regarding better return on the tennis courts, and other systems used by other cities. Motion Rosenberger, second Mayor Simpson. So ordered. Recommendation to,receive and file,memorandum_from Plan- ping Commissionto_City Council noting concern,of,delay of,noise enforcement. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 6, 1988. Ac-,Wtion: To receive and file, noting that the Council concurs with the Planning Commission's concerns. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. (i) Recommendation to award. agreements.. and. authorize Mayor to.,sign,with i) Steiny„&.Co. Inc, fpr construction„of traffic. signal. improvements_ in an.amount not,to exceed $157,190, and 21. with .Mohle, _Grover _� Assoc _ for_,inspec- tion.and administration sves, fora cost,.not to exceed $17,600;. authorize staff to, issue_ehange.orders_and ad- denda,.as necessary.(CIP_85-1 8), Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 6, 1988. Sup- plemental from City Clerk - copy of .contracts. (j) Recommendation to, receive and_file report. On.permits..for live,bands and amplified Sound. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated June 8, 1988. . (k) RecOmmendation.to receive,:,and,file status report on City Hazardous_Waste Management,Program and County Hazardous Waste,Management.Pian. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated May 17, 1988. (Con- tinued by Councilmember Williams from 5/24/88 mtg.) Action: To continue this item. oil t on iWilliams, second Mayor Simpson. So ordered. (1) Recommendation tO.authorize„purchase of Hewlett Packard Eagle Disc Drive. Memorandum from General Services Di- rector Joan Noon dated June 2, 1988. Action: To approve $6,500 for a 404 Disc Drive. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. (m) Recommendation to convert the City Hall, telephone system Direct-in-dialing DR). Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated June 7, 1988. (n) Recommendation to accept and acknowledge gifts_to_City from Beach Cities Cycle . Z police bicycles;.. and ,from a Hermosa_$each family.,(Gregnbelt Park benches . Memoran- dum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 7, 1988. - 3 - Minutes 6-14-88 (o) Reeommendation.to,approve lease agreement for,rental of Pity -owned._ property, at 74 -14th Street. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated May 17, 1988. Addressing the Council on this item was: Carol Banihashemi - 12531 Eucalyptus Hawthorne - explaining the proposed bicycle rental and storage. Action: To not approve the lease agreement, to use this lot for parking purposes only, and to go ahead with the eight parking spaces. Motion Williams, second Creighton. Noting the objec- tions of Rosenberger and Sheldon, so ordered. (p) Recommendationto.authorize City Manager to sign revised month-to-monthcontraot.with,RCC. Memorandum from Public Safety Dir. Steve Wisniewski dated June 8, 1988. Noting a NO vote by Williams due to penalties for late payments. MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING Action: To waive further reading of any resolution or ordinance on this evening's agenda. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - None 2. ORDINANCES.AND RESOLUTIONS (a) ORDINANCE.NO. 88 -922 -.AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA,BEACH, CALIFORNIA,. AMENDING.CITY..CODE SECTION. 27 2.16,,ADDRESSING THE,COUNCIL. For adoption. Act .on;,. To adopt Ordinance No. 88-922. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. (b) ORDINANCE '10...J3.87929 -,AN ORDINANCE,OF OF. THE. CITY . OF MOSA.BEACH, CALIFORNIA', -AMENDING_ MUNICIPAL CODE:ARTICLE V SECTIONS. PERTAINING TO COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR DINING EN- CROACHMENT_PERMITS. For adoption. Action:, To adopt Ordinance No. 88-929. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. FiVal_Action: To direct staff to perform a one-month review. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered. (0) ORDINANCE NO. 88-930 -,_AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY. OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING,MAP BY CHANGING THE ,ZONE .FOR_AREAS DESCRIBED AND SHOWN ON AT- TACHED MAPS AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL_NEGATIVE DEC- LARATION. For adoption. 4 Minutes 6-14-88 Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88-930. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered noting a NO vote by Williams because of the rezoning of area 98 from R-2 to R -2B except for areas currently zoned R-3. (d) ORDINANCE NO. 88793? - AN ORDINANCE_OF THECITY .OF HER.- MOSA BEACH, CALIFQRNIA,.. ESTABLISHING., A,FIRE FLOW,•FEE• TO UPGRADE, FIRE..PROTECTION . RE AND TO,,ASSISTCONSTRUCTION PROD - CS TO M ET UN FORM FIRE CODE Q. REM N S For adop- tion. Heard with item 10 Action: To reintroduce Ordinance No. 88-932 with changes deleting Sections 4 and 12. Motion Creighton, second Mayor Simpson. So ordered noting a NO vote by Williams, and that Mayor Simpson Objects to the deletion of the above sections. (e) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY_CQUNCIL OF•THE CITT OF HERMOSA BEACH., CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AMEMORANDUM. OF,, UNDERSTAND- ING WITH THE HERMOSA BEACHPOtJCE,OFFICER ASSOCIATION, OFFICERSyAND _SERGEANTS $ARGAINING•..,UN.IT. For adoption.. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat- ed June 9, 1988. Supplemental - memorandum from Person- nel Director Robert Blackwood dated June 14, 1988. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5150. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (f) A RESOLUTION OF THE,CITY CQUNCIL OF,THE,CITY,OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,. ADOPTING,A MEMORANDUM,QF•UNDERSTAND- ING..WITH THE_HERMOSA_BEACH COMMANDERS BARGAINING.UNIT. For adoption. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated June 13,1988. Withdrawn by Personnel Director Robert Blackwood. (g) A RESOLUTION OF.THE CITY_ COUNCIL.•OF.THE CITYOF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA, APPROVING•FINAL PARCEL MAP #18895 FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT. LOCATED AT, 51_ ELEVENTH STREET. For adoption. Memorandum from Planning Direc- tor Michael Schubach dated June 6, 1988. Oct on; To adopt Resolution No. 88-5151. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered. (h) A RESOLUTION OF•THE CITY_COUNCIL•OF.THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,,APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIQNS ,LIMIT FOR • THE_ FISCAL, YEAR_. 19.$$-$9, For adoption. Memorandum from Finance Administrator Viki Copeland dated June 9, 1988. Action;. To adopt Resolution No. 88-5152, amending Sec- tion 1 to read: "That for the City of Hermosa Beach the appropriations•limit in the fiscal year 1988-89 shall be $9,505,004. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. 5 Minutes 6-14-88 (i) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY 0F,H£RMOSA,BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REP ALING LEGALLY INCONSISTENT AND SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE ORDINANCES FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE. For intro- duction. Memorandum rom City Attorney James P. Lough dated May 26, 1988. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 88-933. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM, THE CONSENT,. CALENDAR, FOR, SEPARATE • DISCUSSION. Consent Calendar items (d) Simpson, (g) Rosenberger, (h) Sheldon, (k) Williams, (1) Sheldon and (0) Williams were discussed at this time but are listed in order for clarity, and noting a NO vote by Williams on (p). 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. None. PUBLICAEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF LOT MERGERS: A. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION.. DECISION TO, NOT MERGE LOTS LOCATED_. AT 1254. -,20TH STREET WITH._PROPOSED RESOLUTION. (Continued from 5/24/88 meeting.) B. APPEAL OFPLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO,NOT MERGE LOTS LOCATED AT 1224 -_20TH PLACE WITH PROPOSED RESOLUTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 16, 1988. • The staff report was presented by Planning Director Michael Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Chao-Hsing Pian - 1224 -20th Place - requesting council not to merge his lots The Public Hearing was closed. ction To merge the lots at 1254 -20th Street, and 1224 0th P ace, and adopt the following Resolutions: RESOLUTION NO. 88-5153 entitled "A.BESOLUTION OF THE CITY, COUNCIL. OF, THE CITY _OF HERMOSA _BEACH CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ON APPEAL THE .MERGER OF LOTS COMMONLY KNOWN AS 125.. 20TH , STREET" . and RESOLUTION NO. d8-5154 entitled "A RESOLUTION OFSTHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA APPROVIN ON APPEAL THE MERGER OF LOTS COMMONLY KNOWN. AS 122 .20TH P A0,". 6 Minutes 6-14-88 6. A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT,AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR TICKET SALES AT 727 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY.- MUSIC.PLUS. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 17, 1988 with supplemental report dated June 9, 1988. Supplemen- tal letter dated June 10, 1988, from Gerry Cohen, Epsteen & Associates Santa Monica. The staff report was presented by Planning Director Michael Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Gerry Cohen, Epsteen & Assoc., Santa Monica - he stated that Music Plus wishes to continue the operation of their store on the same hours as they currently operate now: Sunday through Thursday 10:OOAM-10:OOPM; Friday and Saturday 10:OOAM- 11:OOPM; and Dec15-Jan15 until 11:OOPM. They also are requesting that the hours be removed from the Precise Plan to the Conditional Use Permit. Mark Wesley - 3324 Colorado Long Beach, Music Plus Kevin Tuxford - 1124 Vincent St: Redondo Beach, floor manager of local Music Plus Pat Price 719. -8th St - submitted correspondence betweeen herself and Music Plus, and survey of persons using parking lot - opposed project • MaryAnn• Wright - 731 -8th St - submitted pictures of. parking lot - opposes project Shirley Meyer - 654 -8th St - opposes project Betty Martin - 257 -27th St - supports project Tim Syvar - 19725 Sherman Way Canoga Park - project architect The Public Hearing was closed. PrOposed._Action; Approve the hours of operation as they exist today for Music Plus. City Clerk read that was minutes approval to the Conditional Use Permit for special event tickets for Music Plus with amended hours as above. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. Am ended,Proposgd,.Action; The motion is for the parking lot only. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. Noting the objections of Williams, Creighton, and Simpson, motion fails. Proposed, Further.AotiOn: Add condition under Num- ber 3 business and parking lot closing at 10:OOPM. Motion Williams, dies for lack of second. 7 Minutes 6-14-88 Action: This item be sent back to staff to reor- ganize. (Explained that includes that staff talks to the applicant and bring back something that is understandable to the lay person, including public noticing to amend the Precise Plan). Motion Creighton, second. Simpson. Noting the ob- jection of Sheldon, so ordered. Proposed,Further,Agtio0; Eliminate the hours stipulation from the Precise Plan and move that into the Conditional Use Permit. Motion Williams, second Simpson. No vote was taken on the motion. Propgsed,Further,Action To add the hours of operation of the parking lot to the Conditional Use Permit. Motion Williams, dies for lack of second. Councilmember Rosenberger requested a policy state- ment that a Precise Plan never again holds the hours of operation. B. ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION APPROVING ZONE CHANGE FROM R-2, C -POTENTIAL TO..C-3_WITH.A,NEGATIVE,.DECLARATION AND APPROVAL AS TO FORM OF A ESOLUTION APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN,FOR PROPERTY LOCATED_AT 720 TH STREET, -_,LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5. AND,.;.BLOCK REQONDO,HERMOSA,_TRACT._ Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated May 18, 1988. (Continued from 5/24/88 meeting.) This item was continued with item 6A. A recess was called at 10:20P.M. The meeting reconvened at 10:30. At this time Councilmember Sheldon stated that the beginning of the Council meeting was not televised by the cable tv company, and that staff should look into this, and request that they re- play the entire meeting. 7. PROPO$EDBUDGET.FOR FISCAL,YEAR:,1988-1989: Memorandum from Finance Administrator Viki Copeland dated June 7, 1988. A. ADOPT RESOLUTION...FIXING THE COMPENSATION.OF.THE CITY CLERK _ FOR FY_. 1988-$9 . B. CONSIDER RESOLUTION FIXING THE. COMP NSATION OF THE CITY -R..ASURER FOR FY_19:-:9. C. APPROVE USE OF GENERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS IN_THE AMOUNT OF439,000,.FOR, CIP_$5-160, CONCRETE STREET REPAIRS, D. ADOPT RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE, FISCAL TEAR,1988-89. 8 Minutes 6-14-88 The staff report was presented by City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft. Anticipated revenue is 13.5 Million, and anticipated expenditures are 14.3 Million. The Public Hearing was opened, no one coming forward to speak, the Public Hearing was closed. Aelion, To adopt Resolution No. 88-5155 entitled A RESOLUTION.OF,THE CITY_COUNCIL_OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA . BEACH,,CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE COMPENSATION TO BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY CLERK AND PROVIDING A JOB DESCRIP- TION FO SUCH COMPENSATION". 1000/mo. Motion Rosenberger, second Simpson. Noting the abstention of Creighton, so ordered. i n: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5156•entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY.000NCILOF THE CITY OF.HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE COMPENSATION TO BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY TREASURER AND PROVIDING AJ•B DESCRIPTION FOR SUCH COMPENSAT.ON". .750/mo. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. Action.; To approve the use of General Revenue Sharing Funds in the amount of $39,000 for CIP 85-160, Concrete Street Repairs as presented in the Capital Improvement Budget, and adopt Resolution No. 88-5157 entitled "A RESOLUTION ,OF THE , CITY , COUNCIL .QF THE •_ CITY. OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING.THE BUDGET.FOR THE_FISCAL �fEAR 198$-89".($11,312,666), approving the budget and Capital Improvement Projects for fiscal year•1988-89 as presented in Exhibit A, "City of Hermosa Beach Budget Summary 1988-89" and incorporating the appropriation limitation and appropriations subject to the limitation. Motion Sheldon, second Simpson. So ordered. 8. PROPOSED RESOLUTION FOR.FY_1988-89 STREET LIGHTING_DIS- TRICT._ASSESSMENT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 16, 1988. The Public Hearing was opened, no one coming forward to speak, the Public Hearing was closed. Agtiona To adopt Resolution No. 88-5158 entitled "AA RESOLUTION OF .THE, CITY COUNCIL OF.THE• CITY OF HERMOSA- BEACH, ERMOSA-BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND._ASSESSMENT_AND LEVYING ASSESSMENT FOR. THE FISCALYEAR COMMENCING JOLT 1, 19$$..HERMOSA BEACH STREET. LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 198$-199". 9. PROPOSED ORDINANCE FOR_HERMOSA BEACH..CROSSING.GUARDS MAINTENANCE, DISTRICT, 198,89. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 16, 1988. The Public Hearing was opened, no one coming forward to speak, the Public Hearing was closed. 9 Minutes 6-14-88 Action; To introduce Ordinance No. 88-934 entitled ORDINANCE OF_ THE_CITY .OF,.HERMOSA_ BEACH,_ CALIFORNIA= CON- FIRMING THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS,DATED APRIL ,.13, 1988_. PREPARED PURSUANT TO_ RESOLUTION NO.. 8g- 5118 AND. APPROVED PURSUANT. TO, RESOLUTION, NO. 88-5131, QF SAID COUNCIL, ANDTHE PLANS,:SPECI. FICATIONS,_E$TIMATE, DIAGRAM „AND,ASSESSMENCONTAINED IN SAID REPORT; ORDER- ING CERTAIN CROSSING GUARD. MAINTENANCE .SERVICESTO BE FURNISHED AND MAINTAINED FOR TH FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 13_19 ! . Motion Williams, second Simpson. So ordered. 10. PROPOSED EXTENSION OF URGENCY FIREFLOW.,ORDINANCE AND. CONTINUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated June 9, 1988. The staff report was presented by City Attorney Lough The Public Hearing was opened. Speaking were: Howard Longacre- 1221 7th Place - distributed the 1987 Annual Report of California Water Service Co. Densey Nelson- 2515 Silverstrand Ron Vollmer - building at 2526 Hermosa Avenue The Public Hearing was closed. • Proposed_ Action: Direct•staff to request that the water company make any required improvements at this time and that any fee we collect should be only for added hy• - drants that are not paid by the water company. Motion Williams, dies for lack of a second. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88-935 entitled "AN INTERIM URGENCY. ORDINANCE OF_THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXTENDING_ ORDINANCE NO_._56-931 WHICH ESTABLISHES AFIRE FLOW FEE.TO,UPGRADE FIRE PROTECTION", and continuance of a negative declaration. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Mayor Simpson NOES - Williams MUNICIPAL MATTERS 11. RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE ALTERNATIVE HOURS OF OPERA- TION FOR CITY HAI.L_OFFICES. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated May 16, 1988. (Con- tinued from 5/24/88 meeting.) Aet4on;. To continue this item to the next meeting. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. 12. REPORT ON_STATUS OF„STUDY,QF„PARKING REMOVAL ON THEWEST SIDE`_OF.PACIFIC_COAST HIGHWAY BETWEEN 3 P.M. AND 7 P.M. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich�� dated June 6, 1988. - 10 - Minutes 6-14-88 This item was withdrawn. 13. RECOMMENDATION_TO.A(THORIZE DELETING R-2 AND 87.3 USES FROM. BILTMORE SITE..AEPRAISAL. Memorandum from City Man- ager Kevin B. Northcraft dated June 7, 1988. Action: To change R-2 to R -2B and delete R-3 from the appraisal. (Resulting in R-1 and R -2B) Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting the objection of Creighton. 14. MISCELLANEOUS... ITEMS , AND REPORTS ,- . CITY , MANAGER City Manager Northcraft announced the Special Meetings of Thursday, June 16 at 7:OOP.M. to finalize goals; and the joint meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council and the Hermosa Beach City School District on Monday, June 20 at 7:OOP.M. at the Community Center, Room 12. 15. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS,AND.REPORTS,_-_CITY COUNCIL (a) Request by , Coung}.lmember. _Williams._to_ be .apppnted..dele- gate to,the„Deach,.,Cities_Cpalition for, Drug,. Free, Youth. istasi To appoint Councilmember Williams as delegate to the Beach Cities Coalition for Drug Free Youth. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (b) Request. by_. Couneilmember._.CreightOn, to,_consider 2 dwell- ng_„u 4t . per lot , limit QIP, any .lot within , R-2 .zone. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 9, 1988. ActioD= To continue this item. Motion Rosenberger, second Simpson. Amendm ,nt,,, tQ., MQtipr, I To send this back to staff for analysis of the impact since the rezoning to R -2B, and the impact of not having any R -2B zone, but rather R-2 with a 2 unit limit in the R-2 zone, and making sure it would apply to condos, apartments, and 2 on a lot. Motion Sheldon, noting no objection by the maker and second, motion is amended. yQte„on,.Amended Motion;. So ordered. (0) Status report re.railroad right -of -wax. There has been another meeting held, but there is no new information to be reported. (d) Preparatign.of,ballot measures. Supplemental item from subcommittee - conceptual mandatory ballot measures for the November, 1988 General Election. 11 - Minutes 6-14-88 1. Trade Biltmore Site and Lot C to railroad plus cash (financed by UUT) with Specific Plan ('85) and development agreement for hotel. 2. Sell Biltmore Site zoned C-2. Use money as down payment on right-of-way plus cash (financed by UUT)' over time. 3. Sell Biltmore Site zoned R-1 or R -2B (whichever is highest value). Use money as down payment on right-of-way plus cash (financed by UUT) over time. 4. Buy railroad right-of-way for cash (financed by UUT) Over time. Acs Staff to prepare ballot measures based on above four items for submission to Council no later than July 12 meeting. . Motion Sheldon, second Williams. So ordered. 16. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Vacancies_-,.Poards, and.,_Commissions Pl.anning_CQmmissio9 - 2 Commissioners for terms ending June 30, 1992. 1) Request by Councilmember Sheldon for reconsideration of interviewing prospective Planning Commissioners. Qroposed_4et,0n: To interview these Planning Commission candidates, before the next Council meeting, at a maxi- mum of five minutes each, in an informal setting at the tables. Chat with them, get to know them a little bit before we proceed to vote. Motion Sheldon, second Williams. Restatementof.Motion;Notify applicants and ask them to come in for five minutes each prior to the next meet- ing for a brief get acquainted session. AYES - Sheldon, Williams, Rosenberger NOES - Creighton, Simpson ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the• City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, June 15, 1988 at the hour of 1:28 A.M. to a Special Meeting to be held on Thursday, May 16, 1988 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk - 12 - Minutes 6-14-88 Shall the City of Hermosa Beach sell the Biltmore site, Lot C and development rights to a hotel as substantial payment for purchase of the Greenbelt (former Railroad right of way), with the hotel specific plan and development agreement to be approved by this measure? 2. N ithstanding Coastal Commission policy for visitor serving uses all the City -owned Biltmore site be zoned R-28 and the General an designation changed to medium density residential and sold as is? The Council, prior to the election, should approve a resolution of intent indicating that, if neither of the above measures pass, the Biltmore site will be reverted back to its former zone of C-2 and sold as is. ADVANTAGES: Limits to two issues but really provides three. Provides for a final resolution. Offers options per the Council's resolution of intent r June 23, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of June 28, 1988 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Responsible Agent July 12, 1988 Rotation of Mayor Mandatory committee appointments w/report re. reduction of rotation of Council liaison appointments Consent Calendar End of year adjustments Authorization to hire consultant for CDBG grant application Amendment to investment policy Resolution re. stop signs. Also safe route to school signing and striping Public Works Director Additional report on tennis court operations at Community Center Comm. Resources Director Commercial outdoor dining encroachments Public Works Director Ordinance & Resolutions City Clerk Finance Administrator Planning Director City Treasurer Extension of interim fire flow ordinance Public Hearings Appeal from Planning Commission decision to not merge lots in area LM 88-4 (10 parcels) Council Matters Council approval final wording of Council measures and questions for ballot City Attorney Planning Director City Clerk July 26, 1988 Ordinances & Resolutions Resolutions calling election and requesting consolidation for all measures (Council and People's initiatives) Resolutions re. arguments, authors, and rebuttals City Clerk City Clerk ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Report on problems with campaign contribution ordinance. Recreational Vehicle ordinance Development of design standards and criteria by which to review projects for EIRS Acceptance of work and final estimate for replacement of sani- tary sewers Target Area I (J&J). Results of SCAG Santa Monica Bay Pollution Symposium Report on results of noise ordi- nance study Uniform Fire Code Fire Sprinkler Ordinance Ordinance amending provision against selling gasoline and alcohol at same location City Clerk General Services Director Planning Director Public Works Director Planning Director Public Safety Director Public Safety Director Public Safety Director City Attorney ***************************************************************** June 23, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of June 24, 1988 EXPENDITURE REPORTING: MAY 1988 Attached is a copy of the eleventh month Expenditure Summary for this fiscal year. That point in the year reflects 91.6% of the fiscal year with 81.4% expended in the General Fund and 83.9% expended in the Parking Fund. Compared to the budget, expenditures are below budget by $1,124,434 in the General Fund and below budget by $174,741 in the Parking Fund. By June 30th, expenditures are expected to still be considerably under budget. Review of May reports indi- cates that unexpended appropriations may be as much as $600,000 in the General Fund and $50,000 in the Parking Fund due to per- sonnel vacancies and changes in Capital Improvement Projects. There will be an item on July 12, 1988 recommending reappropria- tion of some of these funds from the 1987-88 budget that were unable to be expended before year end. Concur: ev n B.�Nort raft City Manager Attachments All Department VC/kc Vi i Copeland Finance Administrator 101 1172 7 0 FINANCE-FA454 TIME .13:40:49 :" FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 0000 r • r DEPT: 2110 DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1101 CITY COUNCIL DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200-CONTRACT-6ERV%CE81-- --- 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4319 SPECIAL EVENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1121 CITY CLERK 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 LEGISLATIVE 20, 772. 00 374. 00 374. 00 18, 000. 00 39, 520. 00 28. 300. 00 28. 300. 00 655. 00 8.100.00 5. 206. 00 5. 606. 00 700. 00 20. 267. 00 2, 500. 00 2. 500. 00 90, 587. 00 DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 29, 388. 00 529. 00 529. 00 12, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 1. 444. 88 0. 00 139. 18 1. 200. 00 2, 784. 06 0. 00 • 0.00 41. 59 641. 27 0. 00 648. 36 0. 00 1, 331. 22 0. 00 0. 00 4, 115. 28 2, 293. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17. 367. 72 0. 00 428. 38 13, 316. 20 31, 112. 30 0. 00 0.00 569. 05 7, 623. 20 7, 212. 00 • 4. 272. 36 228. 50 19, 905. 11 560. 48 560. 48 51, 577. 89 26, 491. 52 0. 00 0. 00 14. 500. 00 PAGE 0001 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 - 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 3. 404. 28 374. 00 54. 38- 4, 683. 80 8, 407. 70 28, 300. 00 28, 300. 00 85. 95 476. 80 2. 006. 00- 1. 333. 64 471. 50 361. 89 1, 939. 52 1, 939. 52 83.6 0. 0 114. 5 73. 9 78. 7 0.0 0.0 86. 8 94. 1 138. 5 76. 2 32. 6 98. 2 22. 4 22. 4 39, 009. 11 56. 9 2. 896. 48 529. 00 529. 00 2. 500. 00- 90. 1 0. 0 0. 0 120. 8 r^ 0 • r FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1121 CITY CLERK 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT: 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4323 PUBLIC NOTICING OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1122 ELECTIONS DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES •4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1131 CITY ATTORNEY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION LEGISLATIVE 42, 446. 00 300. 00 300. 00 419. 00 1, 700. 00 220. 00 700. 00 720. 00 10, 000. 00 13. 759. 00 56, .505. 00 LEGISLATIVE 4, 000. 00 4. 000. 00 23, 350. 00 23, 350. 00 200.00 1.350. 00 300. 00 400. 00 2, 250. 00 29, 600. 00 DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 319. 650. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND, 3. 793. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4. 46 117. 22 0.00 0. 00 0.00 497. 00 618. 68 4. 411. 68. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 52. 54 93. 20 0. 00 0. 00 135. 74 135. 74 40, 991. 52 145. 00 145. 00 205. 26 1, 820. 53 200. 00 50. 00 1, 007. 32 6. 361. 90 9, 645. 01 50, 781. 53 0. 00 0. 00 10. 330. 85 10, 330. 85 52. 54 938. 46 0. 00 15. 74 1, 006. 74 11. 337. 59 9.726.50 243.456.36 PAGE 0002 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 454. 48 96. 5 155. 00 48. 3 155. 00 48. 3 213. 74 48. 9 120. 53- 107. 0 20. 00 90. 9 650. 00 7. 1 287.32- 139.9 3, 638. 10 63. 6 4, 113. 99 70. 0 5, 723. 47 89. 8 4, 000. 00 4, 000. 00 13. 019. 15 13, 019. 15 147. 46 411. 54 300. 00 384. 26 1. 243. 26 0. 0 0. 0 44. 2 44. 2 26. 2 69. 5 0. 0 3. 9 44. 7 18, 262. 41 38. 3 • 76, 193. 64 76. 1 r- r • f • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1131 CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1132 CITY PROSECUTOR DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL f DIVISION TOTAL 1141 CITY TREASURER DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC f 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN ` 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL • A 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 5, 000. 00 324. 650. 00 2. 471. 00 10, 000. 00 1, 025. 00 13, 496. 00 338, 146. 00 LEGISLATIVE 25. 440. 00 25. 440. 00 4, 350. 00 4, 350. 00 29, 790. 00 LEGISLATIVE 19, 803. 00 1, 000. 00 356. 00 356. 00 6, 000. 00 27, 515. 00 6. 800. 00 6. 800. 00 370. 00 1, 300. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 533. 03 10, 259. 53 222. 36 44. 31 0. 00 266. 67 10, 526. 20 2, 120. 00 2, 120. 00 1, 275. 00 1,.275. 00 3, 395. 00 1, 711. 18 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 500. 00 2, 211. 18 0. 00 0. 00 53. 63 101. 36 1, 183. 06 244. 639. 42 2, 208. 40 1. 143. 74 0. 00 . 3. 352. 14 247. 991. 56 23. 320. 00 23, 320. 00 5, 625. 00 5. 625. 00 28, 945. 00 18,011. 18 549. 90 0. 00 423. 00 5, 661. 28 24, 645. 36 6, 278. 86 6, 278. 86 368. 52 1. 469. 21 PAGE 0003 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3, 816. 94 23. 6 80, 010. 58 75. 3 262. 60 89. 3 8, 856. 26 11. 4 1, 025. 00 0. 0 10, 143. 86 24. 8 90. 154. 44 73. 3 2. 120. 00 91. 6 2.120.00 91.6 1, 275. 00- 129. 3 1.275.00- 129.3 845. 00 97. 1 1, 791. 82 90. 9 450. 10 54. 9 356. 00 0. 0 67. 00- 118. 8 338. 72 94. 3 2, 869. 64 89. 5 521.14 92.3 521.14 92.3 1.48 99. 6 169. 21- 113. 0 • I • ... • . r• r r FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND • 1141 CITY TREASURER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 110. 00 250.00 125. 00 2. 155. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 36, 470. 00 • DEPARTMENT TOTAL 581,098.00 1201 CITY MANAGER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT • • r r; 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 78. 693. 00 1, 748. 00 1. 748. 00 22, 040. 00 104, 229. 00 7. 500. 00 7, 500. 00 1, 532. 00 1. 750. 00 •350. 00 100. 00 925. 00 5.000. 00 3, 590. 00 13, 247. 00 2, 520.00 2. 520. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 127. 496. 00 1202 FINANCE ADMIN DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 144.109.00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 75. 00 0.00 554. 71 784. 70 2. 995. 88 25, 579. 78 7, 551. 87 0. 00 139. 18 185. 75 7. 876. 80 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 90. 41 29. 68 0. 00 0. 00 0. •00 0. 00 67. 44 187. 53 209. 72 209. 72 13. 274. 05 185. 00 162. 69 679. 71 2, 865. 13 33. 789. 35 424, 422. 92 ' 59, 398. 61 7, 134. 71 4, 328. 34 26, 041.93 96. 903. 59 5. 285. 00 5, 285. 00 1, 231.40 808. 45 130, 80 124. 97 674. 37 0. 00 324. 07 3. 294. 06 20516. 65 2, 516. 65 107, 999. 30 12, 190. 18 130, 891 87 PAGE 0004 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 16. 00 0. 00 16. 00 16. 00 16. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 75. 00- 168. 1 71. 31 71. 4 554.71- 543.7 726. 13- 133. 6 2, 664. 65 92. 6 156,659.08 73.0 19, 294. 39 5. 386. 71- 2, 580. 34- 4. 001. 93- 7, 325. 41 2, 215. 00 2, 215. 00 300. 60 941. 55 219. 20 24. 97- 250. 63 5, 000. 00 3. 265. 93 9, 952. 94 75. 4 408. 1 247. 6 118. 1 92. 9 70. 4 70. 4 80. 3 46. 1 37. 3 • 124. 9 72. 9 0. 0 9. 0 24. 8 3. 35 99. 8 3. 35 99. 8 19, 496. 70 84. 7 13, 217. 13 90. 8 .4 4.4 • • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 r' FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1202 FINANCE ADMIN • r r. r • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1203 PERSONNEL 1,800.00 2, 594. 00 2, 594. 00 7, 000. 00 158, 097. 00 44. 502. 00 44, 502. 00 1. 366. 00 8. 730. 00 210. 00 2. 547. 00 1. 135. 00 13. 988. 00 216. 587. 00 DEPT: MOMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL • 4300 MATERIAL8/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES A 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE r 4320 MEDICAL EXAMS 44. 756. 00 •806. 00 806. 00 3, 640. 00 50. 008. 00 16.818. 00 15. 600. 00 32, 418. 00 764. 00 4. 000. 00 582. 00 3. 000. 00 1, 300. 00 21. 800. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 180. 03 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 12. 370. 21 150. 00 150. 00 122. 93 828. 35 0. 00 423.. 00 0. 00 . 1. 374. 28 2, 149. 47 0. 00 1. 966. 93 2. 297. 44 137, 305. 71 40, 797. 38 40, 797. 38 951. 01 7, 110. 92 215. 00 2. 945. 82 1, 006. 12 12, 228. 87 13, 894. 49 190. 331. 96 3, 340. 75 0. 00 682. 40 35. 00 4. 15 4, 384. 11 85. 56 4, 469. 67 38. 88 226. 32 0. 00 16. 00 0. 00 325. 00 37. 614. 28 0. 00 1, 613: 65 • 3, 309. 12 42. 537. 05 20, 828. 28 9. 811. 55 30, 639. 83 745. 66 4, 442. 83 • 470. 00 2. 572. 26 298. 19 14, 986. 04 PAGE 0005 DATE 06/20/88 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE ti 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2. 535. 50 0. 00 2, 535. 50 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 349. 47- 2. 594. 00 627. 07 4, 702. 56 20, 791. 29 3. 704. 62 3, 704. 62 414. 99 1,619.08 5.00- 398. 82- 128. 88 1. 759. 13 119. 4 0. 0 75. 8 32. 8 86. 8 91. 6 91. 6 69. 6 81.4 102. 3 115.6 88. 6 87. 4 26.255.04 87.8 7. 141. 72 806. 00 807. 65- 330. 88 7, 470. 95 6. 545. 78- 5, 788. 45 757. 33- 18. 34 442. 83- 112.00 427. 74 1, 001. 81 6. 813. 96 84. 0 0. 0 200. 2 90. 9 85. 0 138. 9 62. 8 102. 3 97. 5 111. 0 80. 7 85. 7 22. 9 68. 7 dei M, 41, .1 •' ••' • • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 i" • FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND r` 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER OBJECT SUBTOTAL r" CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0006 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 31, 446. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 113, 872.00 r' 1205 CABLE TV DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT • • • r: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 'OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1206 DATA PROCESSING 5.813. 00 105. 00 105. 00 756. 00 6, 779. 00 1, 824. 00 1, 824. 00 2.300. 00 1. 000. 00 360. 00 500. 00 550. 00 4, 710. 00 13, 313. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 606. 20 9, 134. 02 453. 00 0. 00 0. 00 91. 00 544. 00 0.00 0.00 27. 22 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 27. 22 571. 22 23, 514. 98 0. 00 96,691.86 2,535.50 5. 102. 03 0. 00 0. 00 847. 00 5. 949. 03 1, 052. 14 1, 052. 14 2, 236. 72 O. 00 360. 00 227. 50 408. 80 3, 233. 02 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 370. 00 370. 00 436. 65 0. 00 0. 00 98. 00 0. 00 534. 65 10.234.19 904.65 7, 931.02 74. 7 14,644. 64 97. 1 710. 97 87. 7 105. 00 0. 0 105. 00 0. 0 91.00 112.0 829. 97 87. 7 401.86 77.9 401.86 77.9 373.37- 116.2 1,000.00 0.0 0.00 100.0 174. 50 65. 1 141.20 74.3 942.33 79.9 2,174.16 83. 6 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES r" 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 44,152.00 4.595.11 44,359.68 0.00 207.68- 100._ 4 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 2,000.00 0.00 118.48 • 0.00 1,881.52 5.9 • 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 795. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 795. 00 O. 0 • 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 795.00 0.00 0.00 O. 00 795.00 O.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 47, 742.00 ' 4,595.11 44, 478.16 0.00 3,263.84 93.1 • 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 125, 445. 00 125, 445. 00 6, 928. 00 8, 600. 00 2,174.49 2,174.49 191. 32 7.59 76, 860. 49 76, 860. 49 2. 125. 91 7,234. 57 3, 000. 00 3, 000. 00 0.00 0.00 45, 584. 51 63. 6 45, 584. 51 63. 6 4,802:09 30.6 1,365.43 84.1 • . FINANCE-FA454 • TIME 13:40:49 • R FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1206 DATA PROCESSING DEPT: r r`. r 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS • 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT r OBJECT SUBTOTAL • DIVISION TOTAL 1207 BUS LICENSE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL • I CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION MGMT/SUPPORT 3. 000. 00 370. 00 3, 974. 00 500. 00 23, 372. 00 43.305. 00 43. 305. 00 239. 864. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES i� 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP Cr 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL • DIVISION TOTAL • 1208 GEN APPROP 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 74, 727. 00 500. 00 1. 345. 00 1, 345. 00 77. 917. 00 35. 00 35. 00 419. 00 3. 000. 00 225. 00 300. 00 30. 00 500. 00 350. 00 4. 824. 00 82, 776. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 23. 772. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 51. 30 0. 00 250. 21 197. 03 197. 03 7.216. 84 5, 877. 14 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 5. 877. 14 20.00- 20. 00- 27. 07 183. 51 11:82 0. 00 0. 00 160. 00 0. 00 382. 40 6.239. 54 1, 479. 44 200.00 3. 524. 70 885. 23 15, 449. 85 43, 844. 63 43, 844. 63 . 180. 633. 13 67. 046. 58 0.00 612. 74 574. 85 68.234. 17 • 32. 50 32. 50 280. 52 • 2. 863. 65 281. 42 214. 93 30. 00 304. 00 340. 00 4, 314. 52 72. 581. 19 1. 981. 00 21, 791. 00 PAGE 0007 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 375. 00 375. 00 76. 68 76. 68 3. 451. 68 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 63. 85 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 63. 85 63. 85 0.00 1. 520. 56 170. 00 449. 30 760. 23- 7, 547. 15 616.31- 616.31- 55,779.19 16.31- 616.31 55,779.19 7. 680. 42 500. 00 732. 26 770. 15 9. 682. 83 49. 3 54. 0 88. 6 252. 0 67. 7 101. 4 101.4 76. 7 89.7 0.0 45. 5 42. 7 87. 5 2.50 92.8 2.50 92.8 138. 48 66. 9 72. 50 97. 5 56. 42- 125. 0 85.07 71.6 0. 00 100. 0 196. 00 60. 8 10. 00 97. 1 445. 63 90. 7 10, 130. 96 87. 7 • 1, 981. 00 91. 6 0, 411.4 0.4 00, •, r • • • r.. r r: r • • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1208 GEN APPROP DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4322 UNCLASSIFIED OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1212 EMP BENEFITS 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4189 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS • OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1213 RETIREMENT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4180 RETIREMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUNDI FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION MGMT/SUPPORT 0. 00 428. 00 428. 00 24, 628. 00 15, 084. 00 15. 084. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 21. 848. 00 21,848. 00 10, 437. 00 10, 437. 00 71.997. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 363. 702. 00 363. 702. 00 363, 702. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 984.045. 00 984, 045. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 1,981.00 582. 47 582. 47 0. 00 5, 457. 97- 1. 557. 94- 0. 00 7. 015. 91- 0. 00 0. 00 1..879. 62 1. 879. 62 2.572.82- 34, 058. 35 34, 058. 35 34. 058. 35 79, 392.85 79. 392. 85 25. 72 0. 00 0. 00 21, 816. 72 16. 065. 89 16, 065. 89 . 210. 59 41, 442. 10- 4, 636. 93- 26, 343. 69 19. 524. 75- 14, 732. 32 14, 732. 32 8. 693. 87 8. 693. 87 41. 784. 05 352, 890. 88 352, 890. 88 352, 890. 88 677. 145. 11 677, 145. 11 PAGE 0008 DATE 06/20/88 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 039. 55 0. 00 0. 00 1, 039. 55 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 039. 55 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 25. 72- 428. 00 428. 00 2, 811. 28 981. 89- 981. 89- 210. 59- 40, 402. 55 4,636. 93 26, 343. 69- 18, 485. 20 7. 115. 68 7,115.68 1. 743. 13 1. 743. 13 0.0 0. 0 0. 0 88. 5 106. 5 106. 5 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 67. 4 67. 4 83.2 83. 2 29. 173. 40 59. 4 10.811. 12 97. 0 10, 811. 12 97. 0 10. 811. 12 97. 0 306, 899.89 68. 8 306, 899. 89 68. 8 • . FINANCE-FA454 • TIME 13:40:49 P"^ r r. . FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND DIVISION TOTAL 1214 PROSP EXP DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4322 UNCLASSIFIED OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1216 ADVERTISING DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER • 4323 PUBLIC NOTICING OBJECT SUBTOTAL • r • DIVISION TOTAL 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2101 POLICE DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 4109 COURT TIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4114 POLICE RESERVES 4115 EXTRA TIME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION 984. 045. 00 MGMT/SUPPORT 38, 755. 00 38. 755. 00 38. 755. 00 MGMT/SUPPORT 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 MGMT/SUPPORT 1. 925. 590. 00 1. 925. 590. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 79, 392. 85 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 677. 145. 11 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 161, 018. 00 • 1. 777, 987. 33 161, 018. 00 1. 777. 987. 33 1, 925. 590. 00 161, 018.00 1, 777, 987. 33 4, 177, 997. 00 322, 226: 54 • 3, 508, 279. 00 POLICE 286, 485. 00 1. 307, 683. 00 25. 875. 00 10.200. 00 60, 400. 00 12. 900. 00 29. 087. 00 29, 087. 00 15, 774. 00 10. 000. 00 • 0. 00 • 20. 089. 50 105, 805. 88 1, 320. 00 1, 423. 12 5, 350. 28 1, 078. 05 0. 00 3. 068. 88 1, 537. 61 30. 00 0. 00 223. 217. 53 1, 136, 962. 12 13. 860. 00 6. 524. 94 50. 084. 97 14, 064. 37 11. 666. 03 41, 629. 61 15. 125. 24 1. 273. 00 176. 00 PAGE 0009 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7.995. 23 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 306. 899. 89 38. 755. 00 38, 755. 00 38, 755. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 147, 602. 67 147, 602. 67 147, 602. 67 661, 722. 77 68. 8 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 92.3 92. 3 92. 3 84. 1 63, 267. 47 77. 9 170, 720. 88 86. 9 12, 015. 00 53. 5 3, 675. 06 63. 9 10, 315. 03 82. 9 1, 164. 37- 109. 0 17, 420. 97 40. 1 12, 542. 61- 143. 1 648. 76 95. 8 8, 727. 00 12. 7 176. 00- 0. 0 r • • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0010 i TIME 13:40:49 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE :G 001 GENERAL FUND 2101 POLICE DEPT: POLICE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4118 FIELD TRAINING OFFICER 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4301 DAMAGE SETTLEMENTS 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE. STC 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 250. 00 6.045. 00 26.250. 00 1, 825.036. 00 20.905. 00 226, 554. 00 247, 459. 00 5. 000. 00 18, 799. 00 28. 800. 00 13. 500. 00 3, 250. 00 8, 120. 00 17. 500. 00 21. 000. 00 15, 000. 00 10, 000. 00 1, 535. 00 3, 300. 00 4. 865. 00 150, 669. 00 5400 EQUIPMENT . 5400 EQUIPMENT 44. 165. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 44, 165.00 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS • OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2201 FIRE 85. 154. 00 85, 154. 00 2. 352. 483. 00 2, 352. 483. 00 DEPT: FIRE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 371. 04 20. 68 2.916. 80 143, 011. 84 1. 640. 06 2.288. 67 3, 928. 73 0. 00 648. 41 3. 133. 32 995. 41 70, 00 786. 93 . 1, 273. 46 5, 921. 76 31. 96- 1, 224. 71 0. 00 •334. 04 584. 25 14, 940. 33 633. 68 633..68 4. 644. 34 4, 644. 34 167, 158. 92 167. 158. 92 33, 300. 00 2, 729. 50 4, 493. 44 3. 225. 94 26, 253. 57 1. 548, 556. 76 13. 014. 08 228, 964. 65 . 241, 978. 73 • 2.000.00 12, 362. 35 25, 977. 88 14. 286. 89 2. 057. 33 3, 562. 26 16, 032. 58 13, 770. 45 . 12. 088. 81 3. 454. 30 962. 50 2, 797. 13 3, 431. 52 112, 784. 00 9, 859. 45 9. 859. 45 71, 428. 79 71, 428. 79 1. 984. 607. 73 1. 984, 607. 73 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 1,024. 26 0. 00 0.00 452. 62 0. 00 0. 00 36. 25 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 513. 13 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 513. 13 1. 513. 13 22.244. 09 0. 00 756. 56 2, 819. 06 3. 57- 276, 479. 24 7. 890. 92 2, 410. 65- 5. 480. 27 3, 000. 00 6. 436. 65 1. 797. 86 786. 89- 1, 192. 67 4, 105. 12 1. 467. 42 7. 229. 55 2. 874. 94 6, 545. 70 572. 50 502. 87 1. 433. 48 36, 371. 87 34.305. 55 34, 305. 55 13. 725. 21 13, 725. 21 • 366. 362. 14 366, 362. 14 85. 5 53. 3 100. 0 84. 8 62. 2 101. 0 97. 7 40. 0 65. 7 93. 7 105. 8 63. 3 49. 4 91. 6 65. 5 80. 8 34. 5 62. 7 84. 7 70. 5 75. 8 22. 3 22.3. 83. 8 83. 8 84. 4 84. 4 11. 055. 91 66. 7 FINANCE-FA454 IP TIME 13:40:49 • • r • FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 2201 FIRE DEPT: FIRE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4108 FLSA OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2401 ANIMAL CONTROL 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MI8C DEPT: 737, 651.00 95, 900. 00 50, 900. 00 49, 615. 00 48. 151. 00 8, 700. 00 1, 024, 217. 00 500. 00 58. 570. 00 59, 070. 00 2. 987. 00 2.000.00 750. 00 9, 225. 00 3,-000. 00 2, 000.00 650. 00 4. 000. 00 525. 00 25. 137. 00 23.980. 00 23. 980. 00 5, 401. 00 5. 401. 00 1. 137, 805. 00 1, 137.805. 00 ANIMAL REGULTN 61, 293. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 62, 063. 68 5, 384. 26 4, 405. 12 0. 00 0. 00 57. 19 74, 639. 75 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 357. 59 439. 76 0. 00 849. 82- 585. 22 29. 85 0. 00 166. 54 0. 00 . 729. 14 1, 491.00 1, 491. 00 47. 62 47. 62 76, 907. 51 76, 907. 51 641. 625. 12 125, 123. 05 69, 968. 13 40, 229. 85 10, 578. 00 6. 767. 92 916, 536. 16 666. 80 48. 392. 60 49, 059. 40 3, 740. 03 2, 961. 95 0. 00 4. 718. 82 3. 336. 17 3, 804. 59 441. 75 5, 373. 73 473. 60 24, 850..64 5, 314. 93 5, 314. 93 536. 19 536. 19 996, 297. 32 996, 297. 32 4, 636. 52 58, 189. 11 PAGE 0011 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 506. 07 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 506. 07 13, 947. 31 13, 947. 31 0.00 0.00 14, 453. 38 14, 453. 38 0. 00 96, 025. 88 86. 9 29.223.05- 130.4 19, 068. 13- 137. 4 9, 385. 15 81. 0 37, 573. 00 21. 9 1, 932. 08 77. 7 107,680.84 89.4 166. 80- 133.3 10, 177. 40 82. 6 10, 010. 60 83. 0 753.03- 125.2 961. 95- 148. 0 750. 00 0. 0 4, 000. 11 56. 6 336. 17- 111. 2 1.804.59- 190.2 208. 25 67. 9 1.373.73- 134.3 51. 40 90. 2 219. 71- 100. 8 4, 717. 76 80. 3 4, 717. 76 80. 3 4. 964. 81 9. 9 4, 864. 81 9. 9 127, 054.30 88.8 • 127.054.30 88.8 3, 103. 89 94. 9 • r• r , r r • • • r: C' FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 2401 ANIMAL CONTROL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0012 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE DEPT: ANIMAL REGULTN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIAL'S/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL . 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5. 850. 00 1, 103. 00 1. 103. 00 1. 300. 00 393. 00 71, 042. 00 1, 800. 00 5. 000. 00 6. 800. 00 308. 00 2. 253. 00 1. 000. 00 1, 000. 00 1. 500. 00 50. 00 200. 00 800. 00 7. 111. 00 6. 500. 00 6, 500. 00 3. 70 0. 00 0. 00 46. 07 0. 00 4, 686. 29 10. 00 218. 60 228. 60 11. 10 0. 25 295. 25 84. 28 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 390. 88 832. 96 0. 00 256. 32 487. 38 75. 00 59, 840. 77 1. 171. 51 3. 774. 20 4. 945. 71 249. 76 1, 295. 77 545. 68 1, 276. 45 2. 081. 42 35. 00 127. 61 479. 31 6, 091. 00 0. 00 5. 017. 04 0. 00 1, 103. 00 0. 00 846. 68 0. 00 812. 62 0. 00 318. 00 0. 00 11, 201. 23 14. 2 0. 0 23. 2 37. 4 19. 0 84. 2 0.00 628.49 65.0 0.00 1,225.80 75.4 0.00 1.854.29 72.7 0. 00 58. 24 81. 0 0.00 957.23 57.5 0.00 454.32 54.5 0.00 276.45- 127.6 0.00 581.42- 138.7 0.00 15.00 70.0 0.00 72.39 63.8 0.00 320.69 59.9 0.00 1.020.00 85.6 0. 00 0. 00 1, 208. 78 5, 291. 22 18. 5 0.00 0.00 1.208.78 5,291.22 18.5 0.00 56.15 275.93 0. 00 56.'15 275. 93 DIVISION TOTAL 91, 453. 00 • DEPARTMENT TOTAL 91.453.00 • 2701 CIVIL DEFENSE DEPT: DISASTER PREP 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN r. r 27, 767. 00 500. 00 500. 00 5,361.92 5. 361. 92 2, 232. 84 0. 00 0. 00 71. 153. 41 71, 153. 41 25. 522. 78 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 275.93- 0.0 0.00 275.93- 0.0 1. 208. 78 19, 090. 81 79. 1 1, 208. 78 19.090. 81 79. 1 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2. 244. 22 500.00 500. 00 91. 9 0. 0 0. 0 C C • r'`, r FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 2701 CIVIL DEFENSE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4304 TELEPHONE 1 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4316 TRAINING IP OBJECT SUBTOTAL • r 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL r DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3103 ST MAINTENANCE r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPR IATION PT: DISASTER PREP DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL ` 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL i 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS A 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING r 28. 767. 00 760. 00 760. 00 150. 00 238. 00 650. 00 500. 00 7. 500. 00 9, 038. 00 18. 508. 00 18, 508. 00 57, 073. 00 57. 073. 00 ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 151..220. 00 2. 000. 00 2, 722. 00 2, 722. 00 0. 00 158, 664. 00 56.390. 00 56. 390. 00 20, 000. 00 3, 000. 00 14, 000. 00 200.00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. PAGE 0013 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE Y. 2.232.84 25.522.78 0.00 0. 00 1, 167. 09 0. 00 0. 00 1, 167. 09 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4. 20 42. 00 . 0. 00 0. 00 1, 123. 58 0. 00 56. 39 56. 39 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 60. 59 1. 221.97 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17. 715. 21 0.00 0.00 17,715.21 2, 293. 43 27. 911. 84 17, 715. 21 2, 293. 43 27, 911. 84 17, 715. 21 12, 023. 34 160. 36 0. 00 43:30 0. 00 12, 227. 00 • 4, 242. 62 4. 242. 62 855. 04 669. 54 614. 36 0.00 130. 413. 80 1, 613. 29 • 0. 00 2, 699. 70 231. 00 134, 957. 79 51. 156. 41 51, 156. 41 15. 833. 31 3, 566. 30 11,721.92 104. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 144. 84 0. 00 4, 620. 11 0. 00 3. 244. 22 407. 09- 407. 09- 150. 00 196. 00 473. 58- 443. 61 7. 500. 00 7, 816. 03 792. 79 792. 79 11, 445. 95 11, 445. 95 20, 806. 20 386. 71 2, 722. 00 22. 30 231. 00- 23. 706. 21 5,233. 59 5. 233. 59 4, 021. 85 566. 30- 2, 342. •03- 96. 00 88. 7 153. 5 153. 5 0. 0 17. 6 172. 8 11. 2 O. 0 13. 5 95. 7 95. 7 79. 9 79. 9 86. 2 80. 6 0.0. 99. 1 0. 0 85. 0 90. 7 90. 7 79. 8 118. 8 116. 7 52. 0 st f' r • • • FINANCE-FA454 T1ME 13:40:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 FUND DI.V OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION 001 GENERAL FUND 3103 ST MAINTENANCE DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER OBJECT SUBTOTAL 37, 200. 00 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT 5.000.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL _ 5, 000. 00 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6.300.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6, 300. 00 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 4101 PLANNING 263, 554. 00 263, 554. 00 DEPT: PLANNING 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE r: OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES '4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 41 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 41 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL A • 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 114, 533. 00 700. 00 2, 062. 00 2, 062. 00 1, 500. 00 120. 857. 00 20.188. 00 20, 188. 00 1, 257. 00 14, 507. 00 200.00 300. 00 761. 00 1. 600. 00 50. 00 18, 675. 00 1. 250. 00 1. 250. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 2, 138. 94 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 18, 608. 56 18, 608. 56 9, 057. 51 171. 55 0. 00 0. 00 117. 26 9, 346. 32 0. 00 0. 00 127. 21 337. 15 7. 60 0. 00 80. 00 17. 50 0. 00 569. 46 31. 225. 53 4, 978. 88 4. 978. 88 0.00 0. 00 • 222. 318. 61 222, 318. 61 93, 941. 61 468. 81 665. 28 0. 00 294. 81 95, 370. 51 13, 939. 01 13. 939.01 2, 012. 17 12, 252. 30 113. 51 426. 50 487. 00 444. 18 0. 00 15. 735. 66 0. 00 379. 83 0. 00 379. 83 PAGE 0014 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 4, 764. 95 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 764. 95 4, 764. 95 1. 209. 52 96. 7 21. 12 99. 5 21. 12 99. 5 6, 300. 00 6. 300. 00 36. 470. 44 36. 470. 44 0. 00 20, 591. 39 0. 00 231. 19 0. 00 1. 396. 72 0. 00 2, 062. 00 0. 00 1, 205. 19 0. 00 25, 486. 49 0. 00 6, 248. 99 0. 00 6. 248. 99 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 0 136.1 86. 1 82. 0 66. 9 32. 2 0. 0 19. 6 78. 9 69. 0 . 69. 0 755. 17- 160. 0 2. 254. 70 84. 4 86. 49 56. 7 126. 50- 142. 1 274. 00 63. 9 1. 155. 82 27. 7 50. 00 0. 0 2, 939. 34 84. 2 870. 17 30. 3 870. 17 30. 3 m AO 0 f c• r: r r • r FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND DIVISION TOTAL 4102 PLANNING COMM 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 PAGE 0015 DATE 06/20/88 91.0%. OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 160. 970. 00 DEPT: PLANNING DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 4201 BUILDING 3. 770. 00 3, 770. 00 2, 000. 00 1. 100. 00 250. 00 3. 350. 00 7.120.00 168, 090. 00 DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT 207, 355. 00 2, 000. 00 3, 732. 00 3. 732. 00 216, 819. 00 32, 000. 00 700. 00 32, 700. 00 2. 024. 00 6, 335. 00 900. 00 900. 00 645. 00 2.600. 00 800. 00 14. 204. 00 9. 915. 78 907. 00 907. 00 724. 98 0. 00 0. 00 724. 98 1.631:98 11. 547. 76 15, 823. 12 O. 00 . 0. 00 0. 00 15, 823. 12 1, 676. 74 • 380. 05 . 2, 056. 79 133. 27 1.024.99 42. 01 118. 85 O. 00 402. 85 0. 00 1. 721. 97 3.795.00 265.19 125, 425. 01 0. 00 4, 714. 25 4. 714. 25 2.273. 52 13. 00 0. 00 2, 286. 52 7. 000. 77 132. 425. 78 181, 172. 00 36. 81 0. 00 392. 38 181. 601. 19 21, 777. 29 380. 05 22, 157. 34 1, 751. 62 5. 560. 46 803. 94 465. 58 190. 00 2, 664. 40 770. 50 12, 206. 50 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 367. 64 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 367. 64 586.55 850.40 35, 544. 99 77. 9 944.25- 944.25- 125.0 125. 0 273. 52- 113. 6 1, 087. 00 1. 1 250. 00 0. 0 1, 063. 48 b8. 2 119. 23 98. 3 35,664.22 78.7 26, 183. 00 1, 963. 19 3. 732. 00 3, 339. 62 35. 217. 81 10, 222. 71 319. 95 10, 542. 66 272. 38 406. 90 96. 06 434. 42 455. 00 64.40- 29.50 4.40- 29.50 1,629.86 87. 3 1.8 0.0 10.5 83. 7 68. 0 54. 2 67. 7 86. 5 93. 5 89. 3 51. 7 29. 4 102. 4 96. 3 88. 5 2, 358. 05 37. 8 0 r • - t^ e r r FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 4202 PUB WKS ADMIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4301 DAMAGE SETTLEMENTS 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT: DIVISION . TOTAL 4203 BOARD OF APPEAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT: DIVISION TOTAL 4204 BLDG MAINT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC r r' EXPENDITURECITY SUMMOF ARYHERMOSA REPORT B(BYHFUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION 3. 795. 00 267, 518. 00 CONST/ENGIN/ENF 85.346. 00 1, 536. 00 1, 536. 00 4, 000. 00 7, 000. 00 99, 418. 00 17, 630. 00 17, 630. 00 4, 000. 00 3, 275. 00 9, 300. 00 500. 00 700. 00 500. 00 350. 00 2. 000. 00 1, 000. 00 21, 625. 00 138. 673. 00 CONST/ENGIN/ENF 400. 00 400. 00 400. 00 DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 113, 593. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 265. 19 19, 867. 07 7, 688. 37 0. 00 43. 30 198. 75 529. 66 8. 460. 08 679. 01 679. 01 0.00 435. 01 968. 80 O. 00 55. 48 . 4. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 1, 363. 29 10, 502. 38 30. 00 30. 00 30. 00 586. 55 216, 551. 58 73, 939. 41 236. 16 2. 127. 91 3. 304. 82 6, 365. 44 85. 973. 74 15, 196. 53 15, 196. 53 0.00 4, 631. 82 7, 984. 44 43. 05 847. 16 916. 95 358. 00 1,431.90 409. 44 16, 622. 76 117, 793. 03 150. 00 150. 00 150. 00 8. 766. 54 84, 771. 28 PAGE 0016 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 850. 40 1, 218. 04 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 500. 00 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 120. 34 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 120. 34 620. 34 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2,358. 05 37. 8 49. 748. 38 81. 4 11. 406. 59 1. 299. 84 591. 91- 695. 18 634. 56 13, 444. 26 1, 933. 47 1, 933. 47 4, 000. 00 1. 356. 82- 1, 315. 56 456. 95 147. 16- 537. 29- 8. 00- 568. 10 590. 56 4, 881. 90 86. 6 15. 3 138. 5 82. 6 90. 9 86. 4 89. 0 89. 0 O. 0 141. 4 85. 8 8. 6 121. 0 207. 4 102. 2 71. 5 40. 9 77. 4 20,259.63 85.3 250.00 250.00 250.00 37. 5 37. 5 37. 5 28, 821. 72 74. 6 t r , r 1 f. . • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 4204 BLDG MAINT DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER. 4303 UTILITIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING 4321 BUILDING SAFETY/SECURITY OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 4205 EQUIP SERVICE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION CONST/ENGIN/ENF • 2. 500. 00 2.045. 00 2. 045. 00 0. 00 0. 00 120, 183. 00 16. 200. 00 16. 200. 00 78, 000. 00 29, 000. 00 1.000. 00 800. 00 • 350. 00 10.000. 00 119, 150. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 57. 17 0.00 43. 30 0. 00 0. 00 8.867. 01 870. 65 870. 65 6. 865. 94 3. 156. 89 54. 35 67. 10 0. 00 1, 255. 47 11, 399. 75 1, 430. 95 0.00 • 1, 021. 75 2. 047. 45 200. 00 89, 471. 43 14. 016. 66 14, 016. 66 76. 242. 01 30, 300. 19 711. 52 1, 032. 35 0. 00 7. 046. 77 115. 332. 84 255, 533. 00 21. 137. 41 . 218. 820. 93 DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT 82, 421. 00 500. 00 1. 484. 00 1, 484. 00 0. 00 85, 889. 00 4, 000. 00 2, 200.00 1, 100. 00 450. 00 7. 750. 00 0. 00 6, 661. 97 Q. 00 0. 00 43. 30 0. 00 6, 705. 27 1, 006. 19 194. 88 54. 72 0. 00 1, 255. 79 73, 773. 29 24. 50 0. 00 256. 10 231. 00 74, 284. 89 4, 070. 94 1, 995. 78 1. 578. 36 170. 00 7, 815. 08 0. 00 0. 00 PAGE 0017 DATE 06/20/88 91. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 194. 94 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 300. 00 2, 494. 94 2, 494. 94 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 069. 05 2. 045. 00 1, 023. 25 2. 047. 45- 200.00- 30. 711. 57 2, 183. 34 2, 183. 34 1, 757. 99 3. 495. 13- 288. 48 232. 35- 350. 00 2. 653. 23 1, 322. 22 57. 2 0. 0 49. 9 0. 0 0.0 74. 4 86. 5 86. 5 97. 7 112.0 71. 1 129. 0 0. 0 73. 4 98. 8 34, 217. 13 86. 6 8, 647. 71 89. 5 475. 50 4. 9 1, 484. 00 0. 0 1, 227. 90 17. 2 231. 00- 0. 0 11, 604. 11 86. 4 70. 94- 101. 7 204. 22 90. 7 478.36- 143.4 280. 00 37. 7 65. 08- 100. 8 0. 00 0. 0 0 r r• r r; I • 1' P • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 4205 EQUIP SERVICE 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 4601 COMM RESOURCES 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4302 ADVERTISING 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LURES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4319 SPECIAL EVENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL . CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE ;( DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF, PAGE 0018 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 0. 00 0. 00 3, 000. 00 3, 000. 00 96.639. 00 758. 763. 00 DEPT: COMM PROMOTION 140, 705. 00 1, 600. 00 • 500. 00 5. 372. 00 35, 996. 00 184, 173. 00 38, 850. 00 38, 850. 00 3, 000. 00 40807. 00 19, 319. 00 3. 200. 00 750. 00 230. 00 545. 00 1, 420. 00 1. 330. 00 7, 400. 00 42, 001. 00 53, 756. 00 53, 756. 00 417. 96 417. 96 8, 379. 02 59. 915. 88 10, 003. 00 92. 20 0. 00 0. 00 2, 972. 63 13, 067. 83 1, 675. 00 1, 675. 00 0. 00 387. 15 359. 13 50. 89 33. 18 37. •21 125. 00 52.00 0. 00 34. 59 1, 079. 15 . 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 671. 84 1, 671. 84 83, 771. 81 637, 087. 35 127, 170. 14 1, 220. 22 380. 21 8, 662. 60 31. 858. 79 169, 291. 96 33, 297. 00 33. 297. 00 173. 48 4, 951. 88 13. 344. 81 2, 100. 44 620. 94 399. 18 800. 00 1, 458. 25 1, 329. 37 6, 566. 44 31, 744. 79 9, 437. 07 9, 437. 07 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 4.333. 32 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 131. 80 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 131. 80 2, 385. 39 2, 385. 39 0. 00 0. 0 1, 328. 16 1, 328. 16 12, 867. 19 117, 342. 33 13, 534. 86 379. 78 119. 79 3, 290. 60- 4, 137. 21 14, 881. 04 5, 553. 00 5. 553. 00 2. 826. 52 144. 88- 5. 842. 39 1.099. 56 129. 06 169. 18- 255. 00- 38. 25- 0. 63 833. 56 10. 124. 41 41. 933. 54 41. 933. 54 55. 7 55. 7 86. 6 84. 5 90. 3 76. 2 76. 0 161. 2 88. 5 91. 9 85. 7 85. 7 5. 7 103. 0 69. 7 65. 6 82. 7 173. 5 146. 7 102. 6 99. 9 88. 7 75. 8 21. 9 21. 9 Ci FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 4601 COMM RESOURCES r • r r • .11 f CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0019 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0%. OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE DEPT: COMM PROMOTION 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 3,000.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3,000.00 DIVISION TOTAL 4602 COMM RES COMM 321, 780. 00 DEPT: COMM PROMOTION 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 5101 CHILD ABUSE 150. 00 150. 00 150. 00 321. 930. 00 DEPT: PHYSIOAL/MENTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 6101 PARKS 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 DEPT: PARKS/REC 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL • 62, 701. 00 1;000. 00 1. 129. 00 1, 129. 00 0. 00 65, 959. 00 107, 447. 00 12, 600. 00 120, 047. 00 181. 72 181. 72 1.064. 14 1. 064. 14 16.003.70 244,834.96 82. 74 82. 74 82. 74 16,086. 44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4, 809. 80 0. 00 0. 00 43. 30 0. 00 4, 853. 10 9. 364. 33 0. 00 9, 364. 33 168. 73 168. 73 168. 73 245. 003. 69 2. 500. 00- 2, 500. 00- 2, 500.00- 2, 500.00- 53, 208.38 356. 58 0.00 867. 94 231. 00 54. 663. 90 •85. 756. 66 .0. 00 85. 756. 66 0.00 0. 00 2. 517. 19 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 517. 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 1, 935. 86 1. 935. 86 74, 427. 85 18.73- 18.73- 18.73- 74.409.12 8.73- 18.73- 18.73- 74.409.12 2, 500. 00 2, 500. 00 2. 500. 00 2.500.00 9. 492. 62 643. 42 1, 129. 00 261. 06 231. 00- 11, 295. 10 21, 690. 34 12, 600. 00 34, 290, 34 35. 4 35. 4 76. 8 112.4 112.4 112.4 76. 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 84. 8 35. 6 0.0 76.8 0.0 82. 8 79. 8 0.0 71.4 -•- •' FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 6101 PARKS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0020 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE iL DEPT': PARKS/REC 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER r 4303 UTILITIES 19, 000.00 1.346.60 15, 250.54 O.00 3, 749.46 80.2 4304 TELEPHONE 127. 00 1. 59 78. 12 0.00 48.88 61. 5 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 8. 900. 00 527. 79 11, 615. 20 1. 713. 58 4, 428. 78- 149. 7 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 800.00 47.83 636.88 0. 00 163. 12 79.6 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2. 000. 00 34. 51 1, 896. 16 0. 00 103. 84 94. 8 4315 MEMBERSHIP 0.00 0.00 137.00 0.00 137.00- O.0 4316 TRAINING 500. 00 O. 00 2. 00 0. 00 498. 00 0. 4 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 31. 327. 00 1, 958. 32 29, 615. 90 1. 713. 58 2. 48- 100. 0 • • 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 042. 73 1, 042. 73 0. 00 0. 00 1, 042. 73- 0. 0 1, 042. 73- 0. 0 A DIVISION TOTAL 217. 333. 00 16. 175. 75 171, 079. 19 1.713. 58 44, 540. 23 79. 5 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 217, 333. 00 16, 175. 75 • 171. 079. 19 1.713. 58 44, 540. 23 79. 5 r 8601 CIP 86-601 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES r 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 15, 730. 00 0. 00 13.204. 50 0. 00 2. 525. 50 83. 9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 15, 730. 00 ' 0. 00 13, 204. 50 O. 00 2, 525. 50 83. 9 DIVISION TOTAL 15. 730. 00 0. 00 13, 204. 50 O. 00 2. 525. 50 83. 9 r • 8602 CIP 86-602 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES r 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 74.250.00 O.00 10, 146.30 ' O.00 64.103.70 13.6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 74.250. 00 O. 00 10, 146. 30 O. 00 64, 103. 70 13. 6 DIVISION TOTAL 10.146.30 0.00 • 64.103.70 13.6 • 74. 250. 00 0. 00 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS • 8604 CIP 86-604 A r 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 105, 550. 00 105, 550. 00 0. 00 0. 00 27, 264. 07 27, 264. 07 0. 00 0. 00 78, 285. 93 78, 285. 93 25. 8 25.8 1� • •11 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND r 8604 CIP 86-604 DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER r ' 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0021 _ _ FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. BLOCS & GROUNDS 0.00 0.00 250.00 250. 00 r' ,51,_ DIVISION -_-TOTAL__._. 105.550.00 250.00 r 8606 CIP 87-606 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 180, 591.00 10.653.82 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 180,59/.00 10, 653. 82 0 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 0.00 452.01 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 0.00 319.12 0,1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 771..13 28 5400 EQUIPMENT r " 5400 EQUIPMENT 0.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL •a 180. 591. 00 376, 121. 00 10, 503:700. 00 11,424.95 11.674.95 733. 537. 44 3, 255. 46 3. 255. 46 30, 519. 53 23.269. 87 23.269. 87 452. 01 319. 12 771. 13 957. 11 957. 11 24. 998. 11 78, 868. 44 8. 496, 955: 28 0.00 0.00 3, 255. 46- 0. 0 3.255. 46- 0. 0 0. 00 - __ 75. 030. 47 28. 9 0. 00 157, 321. 13 12. 8 0. 00 157, 321. 13 12. 8 0. 00 452. 01- 0. 0 0. 00 319. 12- 0. 0 0. 00 771.13- 0.0 3.782. 65 4.739. 76- 0. 0 3.782.65 4.739.76- 0. 0 3.782. 65 3,782. 65 60.013. 42 151. 810. 24 293, 469. 91 1, 946. 731. 30 15.9 21.9 81.4 r`• • r rI c- • • • '. FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13: 40: 49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2601 STREET LIGHTING DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4304 TELEPHONE 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8201 CIP 85-201 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY DEPT: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION MGMT/SUPPORT 79, 500. 00 79, 500. 00 79, 500. 00 79. 500. 00 STREET LIGHTING 75. 889. 00 2. 500. 00 1. 366. 00 1. 366. 00 4. 000. 00 11. 309. 00 7. 146. 00 103. 576. 00 15. 530. 00 8, 000. 00 23. 530. 00 190. 000. 00 300. 00 14. 000. 00 1. 000. 00 4, 000. 00 500. 00 209. 800. 00 336. 906. 00 336. 906. 00 STREET LIGHTING • 0.00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 4. 176. 00 4, 176. 00 4, 176. 00 4. 176. 00 6. 065. 54 0. 00 0. 00 126. 34 0. 00 916. 03 440. 19 7. 548: 10 10, 000. 00 0. 00 10, 000. 00 14, 450. 30 27: 86 255. 29- 293. 63 94. 65 0. 00 14. 611. 15 32. 159. 25 32. 159. 25 75. 329. 00 75. 329. 00 75.329. 00 75. 329. 00 67. 545. 84 363. 98 0. 00 1, 239. 89 3. 842. 84 8. 796. 55 6. 317. 24 88. 106. 34 20, 560. 00 4. 825. 81 25. 385. 81 154, 517. 73 168. 52 3, 320. 81 1. 834. 99 2. 803. 55 0. 00 162. 645. 60 276. 137. 75 276. 137. 75 1. 177. 50 7. 031. 25 PAGE 0022 DATE 06/20/88 91.0%. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE . 0. 00 4, 171. 00 0.00 4.171.00 0. 00 4. 171.00 0. 00 4, 171. 00 0. 00 8. 343. 16 0. 00 2. 136. 02 0. 00 1. 366. 00 0. 00 126. 11 0. 00 157. 16 0. 00 2. 512. 45 0. 00 828. 76 0. 00 15, 469. 66 94. 7 94. 7 94. 7 94. 7 89. 0 14. 5 0. 0 90. 7 96. 0 77. 7 88. 4 85. 0 0. 00 5, 030. 00- 132. 3 0. 00 3. 174. 19 60. 3 0.00 1.855.81- 107.8 0. 00 35, 482. 27 81. 3 0. 00 131. 48 56. 1 1, 721. 04 8. 958. 15 36. 0 0.00 834.99- 183.4 0. 00 1, 196. 45 70. 0 0.00 500.00 0.0 1. 721. 04 45, 433. 36 78. 3 1. 721. 04 59, 047. 21 82. 4 1, 721. 04 59. 047. 21 82. 4 0. 00 7. 031. 25- 0. 0 04. 1� • 4 r_ r' r G • r FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND 8201 CIP 85-201 DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 0.00 35, 938. 00 35, 938. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35, 938. 00 8202 CIP 85-202 DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 75, 500. 00 75, 500. 00 40, 000. 00 40, 000. 00 115. 500. 00 8203 CIP 85-203 DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 32, 262. 00 32. 262. 00 0.00 0.00 32.262. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 1, 177. 50 0. 00 0. 00 7, 464. 64 . 7. 464. 64 1, 645. 96 1. 645. 96 • 10, 288. 10 0. 00 0. 00 878. 00 878:00' 878. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,031. 25 0. 00 0. 00 23, 892. 51 23. 892. 51 1, 645. 96 1, 645. 96 32. 569. 72 2.818. 65 2, 818. 65 26, 156. 11 26, 156. 11 28.974. 76 40. 00- 40. 00- 139. 67 139. 67 0. 00 99. 67 PAGE 0023 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 7, 031. 25- 6, 457. 15 29, 480. 85 6. 457. 15 29, 480. 85 741.24 24, 633. 75- 741.24 24.633.75- 7. 00 1, 645. 96- 0. 00 11645. 96- 7, 1.98. 39 3, 830. 11- 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72, 681. 35 72. 681. 35 13,843. 89 13, 843. 89 86. 525. 24 32, 302. 00 32. 302. 00 139.67- 139.67- 0.0 39.67- 139.67- 0.0 17.9 17. 9 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0. 0 110.6 3. 7 3.7 65. 3 65. 3 25.0 0. 1 0. 1 O. 0 0. 0 32, 162. 33 0. 3 +�c FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 105 PARKING FUND 8203 CIP 85-203 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL • r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0024 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 183. 700. 00 11, 166. 10 .61. 644. 15 600. 106. 00 47, 501. 35 413, 110. 90 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 7. 198. 39 8. 919. 43 114, 857.46 37.4 178,075.67 70.3 • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 110 PARKING FUND r 1212 EMP BENEFITS 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES i" 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL i • I DIVISION TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (EY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER Q 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL • f r DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3301 VEH PKG DIST DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 MGMT/SUPPORT 1. 322. 007. 00 1, 322, b07. 00 1. 322, 007. 00 1, 322. 007. 00 PKG FACILITIES 19. 890. 00 358. 00 358. 00 2, 964. 00 1, 200. 00 24, 770. 00 29. 680. 00 29. 680. 00 150. 00 1, 500. 00 2.000.00 3. 650. 00 0. 00 0. 00 58, 100. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 102. 85 102. 85 102. 85 128, 706. 00 128, 706. 00 128. 706. 00 128, 808. 85 1. 519. 50 0.00 0. 00 270. 43 144: 01. 1. 933. 94 2, 514. 70 • 2. 514. 70 19. 55 0. 00 0.00 19. 55 0. 00 0. 00 102. 85 102. 85 102. 85 1, 193, 305. 17 1. 193, 305. 17 1, 193, 305. 17 1, 193. 408. 02 17.365. 68 0. 00 0. 00 2, 419. 64 1. 189. 34 20, 974. 66 25, 594. 20 25. 594. 20 110. 14 16. 00 292. 97 419. 11 444. 53 444. 53 4. 468. 19 47, 432. 50 PAGE 0025 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE Y. 0. 00 102. 85- 0. 0 0. 00 102. 85- 0. 0 0. 00 102. 85- 0. 0 0.00 128,701.83 90.2 0. 00 128, 701.83 90. 2 0.00 128.701.83 90.2 0. 00 128, 598. 98 90. 2 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 524. 32 87. 3 358. 00 0. 0 358. 00 0. 0 544. 36 81. 6 10. 66 99. 1 3. 795. 34 84. 6 4, 085. 80 86. 2 4, 085. 80 86. 2 39. 86 73. 4 1, 484. 00 1. 0 1, 707. 03 14. 6 3, 230. 89 11. 4 444. 53- 0. 0 444. 53- 0. 0 10, 667. 50 81. 6 •� •� r r • • r-' FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13: 40: 49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 110 PARKING FUND 3302 PARKING ENF CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88. TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION DEPT: PKG FACILITIES 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4180 RETIREMENT 4187 UNIFORMS 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4301 DAMAGE SETTLEMENTS 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 453, 381. 00 12. 000. 00 8. 161. 00 8. 161. 00 69, 086. 00 2. 835. 00 69. 944. 00 6, 198. 00 51, 169. 00 680. 935. 00 9, 818. 00 9, 818. 00 1, 000. 00 3, 455. 00 53. 912. 00 38, 259. 00 7, 000. 00 10, 090. 00 350. 00 2, 000.00 2. 500. 00 118, 566. 00 69,375. 00 69, 375. 00 2, 514. 00 2, 514. 00 881, 208. 00 3303 COM CTR PKG STR DEPT: PKG FACILITIES 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE • 0. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 39. 166. 03 396, 722. 77 209. 75 6, 948. 24 541.17- 537.72 2. 85 4, 317. 87 2. 604. 13 28, 813. 46 497. 47 4, 340. 10 . 4. 240. 22 46, 850. 79 42.00 3,025.75 3. 165. 94 35, 944. 57 49.387. 22 527, 501. 27 360. 40 360. 40 .0. 00 298. 37 418. 83 466. 86 1,017.09 430. 12 0.00 • 0.' 00 0. 00 2, 631.27 6, 370. 10 6, 370. 10 323. 43 323. 43 59, 072. 42 2, 536. 03 2, 536. 03 0. 00 2. 594. 09 37, 412. 55 14, 894. 62 6, 916. 75 8, 182. 98 370. 00 1. 537. 14 361. 16 72, 269. 29 50, 402. 84 50, 402. 84 3, 073. 37 3, 073. 37 655, 782. 80 • • 0.00 0.00 PAGE 0026 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 452. 60 468. 47 0. 00 156. 13 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 077. 20 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 077. 20 0.00 56, 658. 23 5, 051. 76 7, 623. 28 3, 843. 13 40, 272. 54 1, 505. 10- 23, 093. 21 3, 172. 25 15, 224. 43 153, 433. 73 7, 281. 97 7,281.97 1, 000. 00 860. 91 16, 046. 85 22, 895. 91 83. 25 1, 750. 89 20.00- 462. 86 2, 138. 84 45, 219. 51 87. 5 57. 9 6. 5 52. 9 41. 7 153. 0 66. 9 48. 8 70. 2 77. 4 25. 8 25. 8 0. 0 75. 0 70. 2 40. 1 98.8 82. 6 105. 7 76. 8 14. 4 61. 8 18, 972. 16 72. 6 18, 972. 16 72. 6 559.37- 122.2 559.37- 122.2 224,348.00 74.5 0. 00 0. 0 4o. r • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 110 PARKING FUND 3303 COM CTR PKG STR 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5500 LAND 5500 LAND OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0027 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION :MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. DEPT: PKG FACILITIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 939,_308. 00 2.261, 315. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 63, 540. 61 192, 349. 46 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 703, 215. 30 1. 896. 623. 32 0.00 0.00 O. 00 1, 077. 20 1. 077. 20 0. 00 0. 0 0.00 0.00 0. 00 235, 015. 50 363. 614. 48 0.0 0. 0 0.0 74. 9 83. 9 • FINANCE-FA454 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TIME 13:40:49 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0028 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE iC 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND r 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER lam' 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 187, 878. 00 14. 690. 00 173, 185. 50 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 187, 878. 00 14. 690. 00 173, 185. 50 O. 00 14, 692. 50 92.2. 1 r DIVISION TOTAL 187. 878. 00 14, 690. 00 173, 185. 50 O. 00 14, 692. 50 92. 1 i DEPARTMENT TOTAL 187. 878. 00 14. 690. 00 173, 185. 50 O. 00 14, 692. 50 92. 1 3101 MEDIANS DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY 59. 809. 00 500. 00 1. 077. 00 1. 077. 00 0. 00 8. 913. 00 5. 4Q5. 00 76, 861. 00 2, 200. 00 2. 200. 00 36. 000. 00 9, 300. 00 100. 00 500. 00 200.00 46, 700. 00 5. 027. 80 0. 00 0. 00 43. 30 0. 00 990. 18 534. 31 6. 595. 59 0.00 0.00 1, 906. 21 253. 51 121. 66 0. 00 0. 00 2, 281. 38 125. 761. 00 8, 876. 97 DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 58. 377. 00 1, 200. 00 1, 051. 00 1.051. 00 4. 323. 80 0. 00 0.00 126. 18 55, 974. 93 0. 00 0. 00 256. 43 462. 00 8. 413. 59 7. 146. 57 72, 253. 52 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 524. 22 0. 00 524. 22 0. 00 24. 495. 50 3, 026. 72 869. 18 0. 00 0. 00 28. 391. 40 0. 00 733. 25 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 733. 25 101, 169. 14 733. 25 53, 033. 94 27. 29 0.00 1, 239. 20 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3. 834. 07 500. 00 1. 077. 00 820. 57 462. 00- 499. 41 1. 661. 57- 4. 607. 48 1. 675. 78 1. 675. 78 11, 504. 50 5. 540. 03 169. 18- 500. 00 200.00 17, 575. 35 93. 5 0. 0 0. 0 23. 8 0. 0 94. 3 130. 2 94. 0 23. 8 23. 8 68. 0 40. 4 124. 1 0. 0 0.0. 62. 3 23, 858. 61 81. 0 5, 343. 06 1, 172. 71 1.051. 00 188. 20- 90. 8 2. 2 0. 0 117.9 .,y '"1 "'1 ""1 "1 1 D f r • A r r r• r • A FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT: 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ' 4303 UTILITIES 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8160 CIP 85-160 DEPT: 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES .4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 8165 CIP 87-165 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 8, 699. 00 4, 957. 00 75, 335. 00 16. 000. 00 6, 000. 00 22.000. 00 5, 600. 00 0. 00 30, 000. 00 735. 00 800. 00 50. 00 200. 00 37, X385. 00 3. 100. 00 3, 100. 00 137, 820. 00 263: 581. 00 STREET/SAFETY 60.000. 00 60, 000. 00 60.000. 00 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 13. 178. 00 13, 178. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 687. 25 829. 61 5, 966. 84 82. 98 0. 00 82. 98 450. 80 49. 88 3, 578. 06 41. 22 156. 06 0. 00 0. 00 4, 276. 02 5, 856. 05 7, 614. 35 67, 770. 83 4, 681. 12 4, 825. 80 9, 506. 92 4. 694. 70 49. 88 24, 890. 62 903. 62 323. 37 195. 00 90. 00 31, 147. 19 PAGE 0029 DATE 06/20/88 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 0.00 2.842.95 67.3 0.00 2.657.35- 153.6 0. 00 7, 564. 17 89. 9 1, 960. 00 9, 358. SS 41. 5 0. 00 1, 174. 20 80. 4 1, 960. 00 10, 533. 08 52. 1 0.00 905.30 83.8 0.00 49.88- 0.0 2, 458. 61 2, 650. 77 91. 1 0.00 168.62- 122.9 0.00 476.63 40.4 0.00 145.00- 390.0 0. 00 110. 00 45. 0 2, 458. 61 3, 779. 20 89. 8 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3, 100. 00 0. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.100.00 0.0 10, 325. 84 19, 202. 81 108, 424. 94 209, 594. 08 4, 418. 61 24, 976. 45 81. 8 5, 151. 86 48, 835. 06 81. 4 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 60, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 60, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 60,000.00 0. 0 0. 00 13, 178:00 0. 0 0. 00 13, 178.00 0. 0 r. r. r r FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND DIVISION TOTAL 8171 CIP 87-171 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 PAGE 0030 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE . 13, 178. 00 0. 00 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE .OBJECT SUBTOTAL 82. 500. 00 82, 500. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 82,500.00 8176 CIP 86-176 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8302 CIP 87-302 46. 200. 00 46. 200. 00 46.200. 00 201, 878. 00 DEPT: STORM DRAIN 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT. TOTAL 8904 CIP 86-904 397, 588. 00 397. 588. 00 397. 588. 00 397, 588. 00 DEPT: OTHER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 5, 581. 50 0. 00 5. 581. 50 0. 00 5, 581. 50 0. 00 • 5, 581. 50 0.00 0.00 5, 748. 85 5. 748. 85 0. 00 5. 748. 85 0. 00 5. 748. 85 0. 00 0. 00 20. 02- 0.00 0.00 20.02- 0.00 0.00 0. 00 20. 02 0. 00 20. 02 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13, 178. 00 0. 0 82, 500. 00 82. 500. 00 82, 500. 00 40, 618. 50 40, 618. 50 40. 618. 50 196. 296. 50 0.0 0.0 0. 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 2. 7 391,839.15 1.4 391.839.15 1.4 391, 839. 15 1. 4 391, 839. 15 1. 4 20.02 0.0 20. 02 0. 0 20. 02- 0. 0 20. 02- 0. 0 0. '00 0. 0 • • r • • • • r r. r •`: • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0031 TIME 13:40:49 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0%. OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT.DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 115 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 8904 CIP 86-904 DEPT: OTHER 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 0. 00 1, 050, 925. 00 0. 00 33, 892. 81 0. 00 394, 109. 93 0. 00 5, 151. 86 0. 00 651, 663. 21 0. 0 37. 9 g A 4 • 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME 13:40:49 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND r 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER f' 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 53, 000.00 4.416.00 48, 584.34 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 53, 000.00 4,416.00 '48,584.34 DIVISION TOTAL 53, 000.00 4.416.00 48.584.34 r DEPARTMENT TOTAL 53.000. 00 4.416.00 48, 584. 34 FUND TOTAL 53.000. 00 4.416. 00 48.584. 34 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. r- r. • • PAGE 0032 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 415. 66 4, 415. 66 4.415.66 4,415.66 4,415.66 91. 6 91.6 91.6 91. 6 91.6 A A. Ara i�` • 46: 'FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE.SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0033 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0%. OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES r 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER r 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 134, 422.00 10, 159.00 124, 253.34 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 134, 422. 00 10, 159. 00 124. 253. 34 r DIVISION TOTAL 134. 422.00 10, 159.00 124, 253.34 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 134.422.00 10.159.00 124.253.34 8502 CIP 85-502 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 153.000.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 153, 000.00 0.00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 153,000.00 i' 8503 CIP 85-503 DEPT: PARKS •0.00 39. 900. 64 39, 900. 64 165. 52 165. 52 40, 066. 16 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES r 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 0.00 0.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 • 0.00 r DIVISION TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 r " 8506 CIP 86-506 r• • • "1 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 8508 CIP 87-508 10.000. 00 10,000. 00 10, 000. 00 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 3. 050. 00 4. 890. 00 4, 890. 00 4. 890. 00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE ti 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3. 050. 00 0. 00 10, 168. 66 10. 168. 66 10. 168. 66 10. 168. 66 113, 099.36 113. 099.36 165.52- 165.52- 92. 4 65.52- 165.52- 92.4 92. 4 92.4 92. 4 26. 0 26. 0 0. 0 0.0 112, 933.84 26.1 0. 00 0.00 0.00 5, 110. 00 5.110. 00 5, 110. 00 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 48. 9 48. 9 48. 9 3, 050. 00- 0. 0 C •. ' r r r : I • • A • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES 8508 CIP 87-508 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 163. 000. 00 297.422. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 3. 050. 00 0.00 0.00 3, 050. 00 3. 050. 00 13, 209. 00 3, 050. 00 1, 035. 18 1. 035. 18 4.085. 18 49.041.34 • 173.294. 68 PAGE 0034 DATE 06/20/88 91.0%. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE Y. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3, 050. 00- 1, 035. 18- 1. 035. 18- 4,085.18- 113,958.66 8- 4,085.18- 113,958.66 124. 127. 32 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30. 0 58. 2 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 • FUND DIV OBJT DESCR I 130 REVENUE SHARING FUND P'.' 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0035 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER r 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 92.122.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 92, 122. 00 r r • • f r DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 92. 122. 00 92. 122. 00 92. 122. 00 7. 677. 00 7, 677. 00 7, 677. 00 7,677. 00 7. 677. 00 84. 446. 67 84. 446. 67 84, 446. 67 84. 446. 67 84, 446. 67 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7. 675. 33 7. 675. 33 7, 675. 33 7, 675. 33 7, 675. 33 91. 6 91. 6 91.6 91. 6 91. 6 r‘. r • • • r FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GR 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4398 RESDL EQUITY TRBFR OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/80 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION MGMT/SUPPORT 221. 953. 00 221. 955. 00 221. 955. 00 221. 955. 00 221, 955. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 221, 955. 00 221. 955. 00 221, 955. 00 221. 955. 00 221. 955. 00 PAGE 0036 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 100. 0 100. 0 100. 0 • r c • f FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 3401 DIAL A RIDE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4302 ADVERTISING 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 9. 567. 00 300. 00 172. 00 172. 00 1, 426. 00 1, 256. 00 12, 893. 00 122, 702. 00 122. 702. 00 7.500. 00 50. 00 400. 00 57. 00 57. 00 200.00 8.264. 00 900. 00 900. 00 3, 690. 00 3, 690. 00 148, 449. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 1.098. 37 0. 00 0.00 0.00 125. 16 68. 97 1. 292. 50 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 16. 66 62. 80 0. 00 0.00. 0.00 79. 46 0. 00 • 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1.371. 96 3402 COMMUTER BUS DEPT: PUBLIC. TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES • 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/M/SC 12, 401. 00 1. 087. 61 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 100.00 0.00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 223.00 0.00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 223.00 0. 00 4180 RETIREMENT 1. 848. 00 150. 02 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1, 769. 00 78. 30 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 16, 584. 00 1, 315. 93 11.397. 60 0. 00 0.00 0.00 1. 169. 04 713. 74 13. 280. 38 45, 341. 11 • 45, 341. 11 0. 00 16. 66 141. 02 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 157. 68 708. 04 708. 04 0. 00 0. 00 59. 487. 21 11. 153. 68 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 405. 43 824. 03 13. 383. 14 PAGE 0037 DATE 06/20/86 91. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE ;4 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 1. 830. 60- 300. 00 172. 00 172. 00 256. 96 542. 26 387. 38- 119. 1 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 81. 9 56. 8 103. 0 77, 360. 89 36. 9 77.360.89 36.9 7, 500. 00 0. 0 33. 34 33. 3 258. 98 35. 2 57. 00 0. 0 57.00 0.0 200. 00 0. 0 8, 106. 32 1. 9 191. 96 78. 6 191. 96 78. 6 3, 690. 00 0. 0 3, 690. 00 0. 0 88, 961. 79 40. 0 1, 247. 32 100. 00 223. 00 223. 00 442. 57 964. 97 3, 200: 86 89. 9 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 76. 0 46. 0 80. 6 r , r 1 r^ • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT. DESCR 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 3402 COMMUTER BUS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES r' 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL • • r^ r 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4302 ADVERTISING 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4316 TRAINING OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 3403 BUS PASS SUBSDY 143. 235. 00 143, 235. 00 2, 800. 00 50. 00 1. 400. 00 200. 00 4. 450. 00 164. 269. 00 DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL • 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1, 426. 00 . 26. 00 26. 00 213. 00 117. 00 1. 808. 00 0. 00 12. 243. 00 12.243. 00 70. 00 70. 00 14, 121. 00 3406 CIRC ELEMENT DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 16. 66 0. 00 0. 00 16. 66 1, 332. 59 8: 58 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 8. 58 0. 00 937. 00 937. 00 0.•00 0.00 945. 58 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 50.817. 82 50, 817. 82 0. 00 16. 66 41. 54 0. 00 58. 20 64.259. 16 181. 61 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 181. 61 1. 027. 00 7. 184. 00 8,211.00 0. 00 • 0. 00 8. 392. 61 0. 00 0. 00 Q. 00 0. 00 PAGE 0038 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE . 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 92, 417. 18 92, 417. 18 2, 800. 00 33. 34 1, 358. 46 200. 00 4, 391. 80 100, 009. 84 35. 4 35. 4 0. 0 33. 3 2. 9 0. 0 1. 3 39. 1 1, 244. 39 12. 7 26. 00 0. 0 26.00 0.0 213. 00 0. 0 117. 00 O. 0 1. 626. 39 10. 0 1, 027. 00- 0. 0 5, 059. 00 58. 6 4, 032. 00 67. 0 70.00 0.0 70.00 0.0 5,728.39 59.4 0. 00 0. 00 0..00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 f P' . r r'` FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 3406 CIRC ELEMENT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0039 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 70, 000. 00 70, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 70. 000. 00 0. 00 16, 760. 46 16, 760. 46 16, 760. 46 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 53, 239. 54 53, 239. 54 23. 9 23.9 53, 239. 54 23. 9 r 3407 COMTR BUS STUDY DEPT: PUBLIC. TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES Q 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 2, 527. 00 112. 57 1, 328. 02 . O. 00 1, 198. 98 52. 5 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 45.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 0.0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 45.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 O.0 • 4190 RETIREMENT 377.00 38.23 384.06 0.00 7.06- 101.8 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 239.00 27.04 294.20 0.00 55.20- 123.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3, 233. 00 177. 84 2, 006. 28 O. 00 1, 226. 72 62. 0 II 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 79.055.00 0.00' 49,858.21 0.00 29,196.79 63.0 ✓ OBJECT SUBTOTAL 79.055.00 O. 00 49, 858.21 O. 00 29, 196.79 63.0 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ✓ 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 212.00 0.00 95.95 0.00 116.05 45.2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 212.00 0.00 95.95 0.00 116.05 45.2 DIVISION TOTAL 82. 500. 00 177. 84 51, 960. 44 0. 00 30, 539. 56 62. 9 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 479:339.00 3.827.97 200.859 88 0.00 278.479.12 41.9 FUND TOTAL 479.339. 00 3. 827..97 200, 859. 88 0. 00 279, 479. 12 41. 9 r • ' • • : I L. Oft • C • • 0 •I r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0040 TIME 13:40:49 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE ti 150 GRANT FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MOMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 35. 000. 00 2, 917. 00 32. 087. 00 O. 00 2, 913. 00 91. 6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 35.000.00 2.917.00 32.087.00 0.00 2.913.00 91.6 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8102 CIP 85-102 35. 000. 00 35.000. 00 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 8137 CIP 85-137 104,819. 00 104. 819. 00 104. 819. 00 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 8138 CIP 85-138 72, 600. 00 72, 600. 00 72, 600. 00 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERyICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 8165 CIP 87-165 186. 505. 00 186. 505. 00 2, 917. 00 2.917. 00 0. 00 0.00 32. 087. 00 32, 087. 00 7. 601. 36 7, 601. 36 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 7.601.36 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 3. 758. 98 3. 758. 98 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3. 75B. 98 0. 00 454..40 454. 40 186, 505. 00 454. 40 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 9.238. 98 9, 238. 98 0. 00 0. 00 9, 238. 98 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 2, 913. 00 2, 913. 00 97, 217. 64 97. 217. 64 91. 6 91. 6 7. 2 7. 2 97, 217. 64 7. 2 68, 841. 02 68, 841. 02 5. 1 5. 1 68, 841. 02 5. 1 177, 266. 02 177. 266. 02 4. 9 • 4. 9 177, 266. 02 4. 9 0. 00 O. 0 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 (1 P FINANCE-PA454 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TIME 13:40:49 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0041 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 150 GRANT FUND 8176 CIP 86-176 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES r 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0. 00 r r DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8507 CIP 87-507 0. 00 363. 924. 00 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 8508 CIP 87-508 56. 300. 00 56, 300. 00 56. 300. 00 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEWARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 29, 000. 00 29. 000. 00 29.000. 00 85.300. 00 484. 224. 00 0. 00 0. 00 454. 40 15, 430. 50 15. 430. 50 15, 430. 50 0. 00 • 0. 00 0. 00 15. 430. 50 18. 801: 90 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 20, 599. 32 42. 191. 54 42, 191. 54 42. 191. 54 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0..00 0. 00 0. 00 42, 191. 54 94. 877. 86 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 343. 324. 68 14, 108. 46 14, 108. 46 14, 108. 46 29, 000. 00 29, 000. 00 29, 000. 00 43, 108. 46 389, 346. 14 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 5. 6 74. 9 74. 9 74. 9 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 49. 4 19. 5 • 1 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 155 CROSSING GUARD FUND r ' 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0042 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 4,500.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4, 500. 00 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2102 CROSSING GUARD MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 375. 00 375. 00 4, 500. 00 375. 00 4, 500. 00 375. 00 DEPT: POLICE 4, 125. 00 4, 125. 00 4, 125. 00 4, 125. 00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 375. 00 375. 00 375. 00 375. 00 91. 6 91. 6 91. 6 91. 6 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 7.802. 00 725. 22 6.088. 64 0. 00 1, 713. 36 78. 0 • 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 0.00 0.00 743.34 0.00 743.34- 0.0 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 140.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 0. 0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 140.00 0.00 256.32 0.00 116.32- 183.0 • 4113 CROSSING GUARDS 43, 064. 00 3, 226. 70 26, 474. 07 0. 00 16, 589. 93 61. 4 4180 RETIREMENT 1, 167. 00 92. 01 1, 173. 79 0. 00 6. 79- 100. 5 4187 UNIFORMS 452.00 21.04 747.52 0.00 295.52- 165.3 ✓ 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 641.00 50.69 769.65 0.00 128. 65- 120.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 53, 406. 00 4. 115. 66 36, 253. 33 0. 00 17, 152. 67 67. 8 r 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 34.052. 00 5. 000. 00 11, 680. 62 4, 000. 00 18, 371. 38 46. 0 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.0 r OBJECT SUBTOTAL 34, 552. 00 5, 000. 00 11, 680. 62 4, 000. 00 18, 871. 38 45. 3 rl C • • DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT• TOTAL FUND TOTAL 87..958. 00 87, 958. 00 92, 458. 00 9, 115. 66 9, 115.66 9. 490. 66 47. 933. 95 47, 933. 95 52, 058. 95 4, 000. 00 4. 000. 00 4. 000. 00 36, 024. 05 36. 024. 05 36, 399. 05 59. 0 59.0 60. 6 • • A r r' r` r'. • A FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13: 40: 49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 160 SEWER FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0043 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3102 SEWER/ST DRAIN 254, 652. 00 254, 652. 00 254, 652. 00 254. 652. 00 DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 78, 220. 00 2.500.00 1. 408. 00 1, 408. 00 0. 00 11, 656. 00 6. 198. 00 101, 380. 00 2. 700. 00 2, 500. 00 5, 200. 00 •500. 00 9, 100. 00 1, 500. 00 1. 500. 00 150. 00 12, 750. 00 2.350. 00 2. 350. 00 9, 070. 00 9. 070. 00 7, 681. 00 7, 681. 00 7.681. 00 7, 681. 00 6. 196. 26 206. 08 0. 00 44. 28 0.. 00 866. 87 • 467. 21 7, 780. 70 0. 00 • 0. 00 0. 00 60. 57 439. 34 98..01 0. 00 0. 00 597. 92 0. 00 0. 00 748. 32 748.32 246, 979. 00 246. 979. 00 246. 979. 00 246. 979. 00 70, 044. 58 1, 639. 28 0. 00 2. 282. 74 231. 00 8. 671. 91 5, 236. 26 88. 105. 77 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 555. 07 4.897. 09 •1.124.58 1. 012. 19 0. 00 7, 588. 93 1, 536. 80 1, 536. 80 8. 979. 84 '8, 979. 84 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7. 673. 00 7. 673. 00 7, 673. 00 7, 673. 00 8. 175. 42 860. 72 1. 408. 00 874. 74- 231. 00- 2.984. 09 951. 74 13, 274. 23 2. 700. 00 2.500.00 5. 200. 00 55. 07- 4. 202. 91 375. 42 487. 81 150. 00 5. 161. 07 96. 9 96. 9 96. 9 96. 9 89. 5 65. 5 0. 0 162. 1 O. 0 74. 3 84. 6 86. 9 0.0 0.0 0. 0 111. 0 53. 8 74.9 67. 4 0. 0 59. 5 813.20 65.3 813.20 65.3 90. 16 99. 0 90. 16 99. 0 r DIVISION TOTAL 130. 750. 00 9, 126. 94 106. 211. 34 0. 00 • 24. 538. 66 81. 2 • • ,. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0044 TIME 13:40:49 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 • 91. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE r • 160 SEWER FUND ✓ DEPARTMENT TOTAL 130, 750.00 9, 126.94 106, 211.34 0.00 24, 538.66 81.2 r 8402 CIP 85-402 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 575, 126. 00 0. 00 573, 876. 73 0. 00 1, 249. 27 99. 7 ✓ OBJECT SUBTOTAL 575, 126.00 0.00 573, 876.73 0.00 1, 249.27 99.7 ✓ DIVISION TOTAL 575, 126. 00 0. 00 573, 876. 73 0. 00 1, 249. 27 99. 7 8404 CIP 85-404 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER • 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 17. 660. 00 0. 00 2, 190. 14 0. 00 15, 469. 86 12. 4 • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 17, 660. 00 0. 00 2. 190. 14 0. 00 15. 469. 86 12. 4 A 1 DIVISION TOTAL 17, 660. 00 0. 00 2, 190. 14 0. 00 15, 469. 86 12. 4 8405 CIP 86-405 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 605,825.00 ✓ OBJECT SUBTOTAL 605,825.00 r• • r<,i DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 605, 825. 00 1. 198.'611. 00 1. 584. 013. 00 6.905. 00 6, 905. 00 6, 905. 00 6. 905. 00 23, 712.94 . 29. 928. 99 0. 00 29, 928. 99 0. 00 29, 928. 99 605. 995, 86 959, 186. 20 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 575, 896. 01 575, 896. 01 575, 896. 01 592: 615. 14 624.826. 80 4. 9 4. 9 4. 9 50. 5 60.5 • • 4 r • r r t • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 2202 HYDRANT UPGRADE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION DEPT: FIRE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 10. 000. 00 1 O. 000. 00 10. 000. 00 10.000. 00 10, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. '00 PAGE 0045 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10, 0 00 . 00 10. 000. 00 10. 000. 00 10, 000. 00 10. 000. 00 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 04. 1", • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 705 INSURANCE FUND 1209 LIABILITY INS DEPT: 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES r 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL • • r r • •. • A ,j c,; 6 i 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1210 AUTO/PROP/BONDS DEPT: 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1215 UNEMPLOYMENT DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4186 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DI.VISION TOTAL 1217 WORKERS COMP DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4182 WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR '4183 WORKERS COMP PRIOR YR OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - -.- 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1218 MEDICARE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION MOMT/SUPPORT 420, 765. 00 420. 765. 00 20, 000. 00 20, 000. 00 440. 765. 00 MGMT/SUPPORT 56. 850. 00 56. 850. 00 56.850. 00 MGMT/SUPPORT 75, 000. 00 75, 000. 00 75.• 000. 00 MOMT/SUPPORT 90, 000. 00 60, 000. 00 150, 000. 00 32,000. 00 32, 000. 00 . 182.000. 00 DEPT: MOMT/SUPPORT 14, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 4, 903. 00 4, 903. 00 7,859. 41 7. 859, 41 12,762. 41 0.00 0.00 0.00 • 1,423. 79 1,023.79 1.023. 79 37.660. 25 5, 974. 08 43, 634. 33 2, 250. 00 2, 250. 00 45, 884. 33 229. 279. 55 229, 279. 55 38, 583. 07 38, 583. 07 267.862.62 36.062. 64 36.062. 64 36. 062. 64 45, 677. 99 45.677. 99 45, 677. 99 126, 027. 80 34, 204. 50 160, 232. 30 32, 587. 00 32, 587. 00 192, 819. 30 1,498.30 12, 834. 95 PAGE 0046 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 191, 485. 45 191, 485. 45 18, 583. 07- 18, 583. 07- 54. 4 54. 4 192. 9 192. 9 172, 902. 38 60. 7 20, 787. 36 20, 787. 36 63. 4 63. 4 20.787.36 63.4 29. 322. 01 29, 322. 01 60.9 60. 9 29, 322. 01 60. 9 36,027.80- 140.0 25,795.50 57.0 10,232.30- 106.8 587. 00- 101. 8 587. 00- 101. 8 10.819.30- 105.9 1, 165. 05 91. 6 06. 077. , • 1 F I NANC E-FA454 TIME 13:40:49 FUND DIY OBJT DESCR 705 INSURANCE FUND 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES r OBJECT SUBTOTAL r DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT TOTALS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 APPROPRIATION 14, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 1. 498. 30 12. 834. 95 14, 000. 00 1. 498. 30 12, 834. 95 768, 615. 00 61.168. 83 555. 257. 50 768, 615. 00 61, 168. 83 555, 257. 50 18, 499, 194. 00 1, 149, 585. 36 13, 591, 320. 51 PAGE 0047 DATE 06/20/88 91.OY. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 79, 161. 91 1, 165. 05 91. 6 1. 165. 05 213,357. 50 213,357. 50 4.828. 711. 58 91. 6 72. 2 72.2 --- 73. 8 nq r- June 23, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of June 28, 1988 REVENUE REPORTING: MAY 1988 Attached is a copy of the eleventh month Revenue Summary for this fiscal year. That point in the year reflects 91.6% of the fiscal year with 92.4% received in the General Fund and 100% received in the Parking Fund. Revenues are above budget by $88,220 in the General Fund and by $192,112 in the Parking Fund. The revenue picture for the General Fund is improved, primarily due to property tax collec- tions. Review of May reports suggests that General Fund revenue may be over budget by $200,000 and Parking Fund over by $135,000. Concur: 'Kevin B. Nor City Manager Attachments All Departments VC/kc 64, Viki Copeland Finance Administrator 147 • i r r r- • • • n r r FINANCE-FA484' TIME 14:45:59 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 001 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3101 3102 3103 3104 3105 3106 3107 3108 3110 3111 3112 3113 3114 3115 3120 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3200 LICENSES 3202 3203 3204 3205 3206 3207 3209 3210 3211 3212 3213 '3214 OBJECT 3300 FINES 3301 3303 OBJECT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) ,FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 /CURRENT YEAR SECURED /CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS /INTEREST/PENALTIES /OTHER PROPERTY TAXES /SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL 8B813 /TRANSFER TAX /SALES TAX /CABLE TV FRANCHISE /ELECTRIC FRANCHISE /GAS FRANCHISE /REFUSE FRANCHISE /TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY /BUSINESS LICENSE /UTILITY USER TAX_ AND PERMITS /DOG LICENSES /BICYCLE LICENSES /BUILDING PERMITS /ELECTRIC PERMITS /PLUMBING PERMITS /OCCUPANCY PERMITS /GARAGE SALES /BINGO PERMITS /BANNER PERMITS /ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS /ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE /AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT SUBTOTAL & FORFEITURES /VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS /COURT FINES/POLICE DEPT SUBTOTAL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 3402 /RENTS & CONCESSIONS 3403 /PIER REVENUE 3404 /COMM CTR LEASES EST REV 10991, 978. 00 154. 756. 00 150, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 100. 00 60, 000. 00 92, 576. 00 1.717, 522. 00 78, 000. 00 30, 000. 00 33, 200. 00 98, 000. 00 131. 324. 00 500. 000. 00 1, 279, 533. 00 ' 6. 321, 989. 00 13, 500. 00 200.00 160, 000. 00 38, 000. 00 30, 000. 00 5. 000. 00 100. 00 200. 00 500. 00 .185. 00 3, 500. 00 0. 00 251, 185. 00 100,000. 00 40, 000. 00 140, 000. 00 56, 000. 00 6, 900. 00 9, 960. 00 60. 000. 00 MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 173, 038. 64 0. 00 42, 457. 47 0. 00 0. 00 3. 056. 83 0. 00 151, 600. 00 24, 545. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 35, 828. 53 21, 280. 16 94, 748. 43 546. 555. 06 335. 50 0.00 18, 419. 27 2. 103, 00 1, 646. 00 500. 00 3,00 0. 00 6, 320. 00 0. 00 320. 00 0. 00 29, 646. 77 8. 268. 25 2, 356. 92 10, 625. 17 396. 03- 192. 07 539. 10 4, 731. 00 2, 059, 695. 82 159, 232. 89 189, 705. 98 0. 00 0. 00 62, 381. 88 108, 415. 70 1.440, 229. 25 90, 970. 00 32, 316. 78 33, 835. 46 101. 413. 23 138. 692. 83 401, 498. 19 1, 054, 230. 83 5, 872. 618. 84 15, 312. 50 106. 50 130, 736. 40 34. 355. 00 26, 108. 50 5, 600. 00 54. 00 50. 00 6, 720. 00 255. 00 3, 699. 00 20. 00 223, 016. 90 77.756. 78 23, 878. 56 101, 635. 34 79, 521. 42 6, 605. 79 8, 939. 22 56, 507. 54 PAGE 0001 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE % 67, 717. 82- 40476. 89- 39, 705. 98- 5, 000. 00 100. 00 20381. 88- 15.839. 70- 277, 292. 75 12, 970. 00- 20316. 78- 635. 46- 3, 413. 23- 7, 368. 83- 98,501. 81 225, 302. 17 449. 370. 16 1.812. 50- 93. 50 29,263. 60 3, 645. 00 3, 891. 50 600. 00- 46. 00 150. 00 6, 220.00- 70. 00- 199. 00- 20. 00.- 280168. 0=28.168. 10 22. 243. 22 16. 121. 44 38, 364. 66 23, 521: 42- 294: 21 1, 020. 78 3. 492. 46 103. 3 102. 8 126. 4 0. 0 0. 0 103. 9 117. 1 83. 8 116. 6 107. 7 101. 9 103. 4 105. 6 80. 2 82. 3 92. 8 113. 4 53. 2 81.7 90. 4 87. 0 112. 0 54. 0 . 25. 0 1344. 0. 137. 8 105. 6 0. 0 88. 7 77. 7 59. 6 72. 5 142. 0 95. 7 89. 7 94. 1 .,y • • •1' r FINANCE-FA484. TIME 14:45:59 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0002 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE Y. 001 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3405 /COMM CTR RENTALS 50, 000. 00 1. 275. 00 41. 760. 50 8, 239. 50 83. 5 3406 /COMM CTR THEATRE 12. 000. 00 2, 290. 50 15, 370. 37 3, 370. 37- 128. 0 3411 _ _ _ /OTHER FACILITIES 59, 000. 00 5. 216. 25 45, 341. 20 13, 658. 80 76. 8 3412 /TENNIS COURTS 12, 500. 00 882. 00 10, 428. 25 2. 071. 75 83. 4 3416 /OIL ROYALTIES 5, 000. 00 0. 00 1, 632. 78 3. 367. 22 32. 6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 271, 360. 00 14. 729. 89 266. 107. 07 5. 252. 93 98. 0 • r • r' •`'i • r- 1 :5• • 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE ' 3504 /IN LIEU OFF HIGHWAY 409.00 0.00 352.90 56. 10 86.2 3505 /IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE 629. 826. 00 51, 170. 68 570, 102. 44 59, 723. 56 90. 5 3507 /HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE 6,000. 00 0. 00 1, 311. 75 4, 688. 25 21. 8 3508 /MANDATED COSTS 2, 171. 00 0. 00 2, 171. 00 0. 00 100. 0 3509 /HOMEOWNER PROP TX RELIE 64, 000. 00 23, 196. 65 56, 334. 72 7.665. 28 88. 0 3510 /POST 15. 000, 00 3, 985. 08 17, 971. 37 2, 971. 37- 119. 8 3511 /STC -SVC OFF TRAINING 10, 000. 00 0. 00 6, 750. 00 3,250. 00 67. 5 3514 /CIGARETTE TAX 52. 000. 00 4, 172. 16 47. 722. 64 4. 277. 36 91. 7 3515 /SUPPLEMENTAL SUBVENTION 25.254.00 0.00 25.254.27 0.27- 100.0 3525 /LOCAL COASTAL GRANT 0. 00 7, 853. 86 7. 853. 86 7, 853. 86- 0. 0 • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 804, 660. 00 90, 378. 43 735, 824. 95 68, 835. 05 91. 4 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3801 /RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION 12.000.00 1,640.00 14.150.00 2.150.00- 117.9 3802 /SIGN REVIEW 700.00 50.00 675.00 25.00 96. 4 3803 /ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 8, 280. 00 460. 00 4, 580. 00 3, 700. 00 55. 3 3806 /BOARD OF APPEALS 900.00 24.00- 600.00 300.00 66.6 3808 /ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW 3, 000. 00 320. 00 3. 520. 00 520. 00- , 117. 3 3809 /TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW 4. 515..00 1, 125. 00 6, 080. 00 1. 565. 00- 134. 6 3810 /FINAL MAP REVIEW 625.00 125.00 1.500.00 875.00- 240.0 3811 /ZONE CHANGE REVIEW 1. 800. 00 0. 00 • 2, 700. 00 900. 00- 150. 0 .3812 /CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 10, 000. 00 3, 840. 00 21, 920. 00 11, 920. 00- 219. 2 3813 /PLAN CHECK FEES 118, 000. 00 8, 196. 25 93, 228. 01 24. 771. 99 79. 0 3814 /PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL • 1. 500. 00 0. 00 799. 50 700. 50 53. 3 3815 /PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES 12, 000. 00 2. 351.03 10, 522. 44 1, 477. 56 87. 6 3816 /CURB/SIDEWALK REPAIR 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.0 3817 /SPECIAL CURB MARKING 500.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.0 3818 /POLICE SERVICES 15. 000. 00 1, 598. 50 13, 013. 50 1. 986. 50 86. 7 3819 /JAIL SERVICES 28, 000. 00 1, 190. 00 25, 900. 00 2, 100. 00 92. 5 3820 /TRUSTY ADMIN FEE 2.000.00 • 0. 00 1,930.00 70.00 96. 5 3821 /FINGERPRINT SERVICE 2.500.00 16.50 2,697.00 197.00- 107.8 3823 /SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY 13, 500. 00 0. 00 22, 755. 00 9. 255: 00- 168. 5 3824 /VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES 2.000.00 144.00 2.622.00 622.00- 131. 1 3825 /PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING 100.00 0.00 30.00 70.00 30.0 1 CITY OF HER OSA H • ! FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMRYMREPORTAC(BY FUND) PAGE 0003 TIME 14:45:59 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE r 001 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 • 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3827 /LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT 5.510.00 0.00 5.510.00 0.00 100.0 r" ' i 3831 /STREET CUT INSPECTION 27, 000.00 2.800.00 25, 327.45 1,672.55 93.8 L _ _ 3834 _ /ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 1,500.00 0.00 880.15 619.85 58.6 3836 /FUMIGATION INSPECT FEE 7.000.00 846.60 7.435.60 435.60- 106.2 r 3837 /RETURNED CHECK CHARGE 760.00 70.00 831.75 71.75- 109.4 3838 /SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIO 600.00 203.60. 1,259.35 659.35-. 209.8 3839 /PHOTOCQPY CHARGES 1.000.00 384.65 942.25 57.75 94.2 ID 3840 /AMBULANCE TRANSPORT 6.500.00 817.00 8,624.37 2,124.37- 132.6 3841 /POLICE TOWING 32, 000. 00 3,165.50 30,003. 00 1. 997. 00 93. 7 3857 /PKG PLAN APPLICATION 1,090.00 0.00 640.00 450.00 58.7 IP 3858 /TENANT REFUSE BILLING 1.250.00 120.00 1,560.00 310.00- 124.8 3859 /REFUSE LIEN FEE 0.00 147.11 1,927.29 1.927.29- 0.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 321,230.00 29.586.74 314. 163.66 7.066.34 97.8 A 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 /SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 8.000. 00 0. 00 1,150.22 6,849.78 14. 3 r 3902 /REFUNDS/REIMS PREV YR 6,669.00 0. 00 6,734.66 65. 66- 100. 9 3903 /CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT 1,000.00 97. 00 3.699.24 2.699.24 369. 9 3904 /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 2, 700. 00 2,165.85 3,540.94 840. 94- 131. 1 r 3955 0 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 1.707.324. 00 156, 358. 00 1. 550, 966. 84 156, 357. 16 90. 8 3956 /RESDL EQUITY TRSFR IN 221, 955.00 0. 00 221, 955. 00 0. 00 100.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1.947. 648. 00 158.620. 85 1.788, 046. 90 159, 601. 10 91. 8 r DEPT 0000 TOTALS 10,058, 072.00 880. 142.91 9.301, 413.66 756, 658.34 92.4 r r `' • A • FUND TOTAL 10. 058, 072. 00 880,142.91 9.301,413.66 756,658.34 92.4 4- • • r`. r • C' • • •` FINANCE-FA484 TIME 14:45:59 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION ; 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3101 3103 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /CURRENT YEAR SECURED /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3904 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL /INTEREST INCOME • /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS TOTALS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 EST REV 397, 647. 00 40. 000. 00 437, 647. 00 70. 000. 00 70, 000. 00 0.00 0.00 507. 647. 00 MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 40, 521.70 3, 092. 94 43, 614. 64 380, 044. 84 23, 598. 13 403.642. 97 5. 464. 44 73, 512. 40 5.464.44 73,512.40 0. 00 2. 000. 00 0.00 2, 000.00 49.079.08 479,155.37 507, 647. 00 49, 079. 08 479, 155. 37 PAGE 0004 DATE 06/20/88 91.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE . 17. 602. 16 16, 401. 87 34.004. 03 95. 5 58. 9 92. 2 3, 512. 40- 105. 0 3. 512. 40- 105. 0 2, 000.00- 0.0 2.000.00- 0.0 28.491.63 94.3 28, 491.63 94.3 r`. r• i r r • r FINANCE-FA484 TIME 14: 45: 59 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 110 PARKING FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3302 /COURT FINES/PARKING OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3400 USE OF MONEY 3401 3407 3409 3413 OBJECT SUBTOTA & PROPERTY /INTEREST INCOME /PARKING LOT RENTAL /LOT B /VPD LEASE L 3800 CURRENT• SERVICE 3842 3843 3844 3845 3846 3847 3848 3849 3850 3851 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3904 OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 CHARGES /PARKING METERS /PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL /DAILY PARKING PERMITS /VPD LOT PERMITS/DAILY /VPD LOT PERMITS/MONTHLY /VALIDATION STAMPS /DRIVEWAY PERMITS /GUEST PERMITS /CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS /KEY CARDS /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS EST REV 1. 400. 000. 00 1. 400. 000. 00 30, 000. 00 29. 104. 00 18. 411. 00 65, 000. 00 142. 515. 00 550. 000. 00 150, 000. 00 3. 500. 00 3, 500. 00 7, 000. 00 2.000.00 500. 00 1, 500. 00 780. 00 20. 00 718. 800. 00 0. 00 MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 142. 176. 00 142. 176. 00 1. 616. 03 2. 192. 25 1.915.84. 12, 011. 25 17. 735. 37 63, 688. 87 15.873. 00 275. 00 788. 10 1, 214. 40 2. 849. 01 88. 50 88. 00 160. 00 0. 00 85. 024. 88 0. 00 1. 323, 421. 23 1. 323. 421. 23 38. 112. 41 26, 914. 75 21. 074. 24 69, 842. 75 155, 944. 15 607. 904. 41 153, 901. 00 1. 700. 00 5, 116. 93 9. 955. 42 2, 577. 43 548. 00 993. 00 1, 340. 00 22. 00 784, 058. 19 PAGE 0005 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE % 76. 578. 77 76, 578. 77 8, 112. 41- 2, 189. 25 2. 663. 24- 4. 842. 75- 13, 429. 15- 57. 904. 41- 3, 901. 00- 1, 800. 00 1, 616. 93- 2, 955. 42- 577. 43- 48. 00- 507. 00 560. 00- 2. 00- 65.258. 19- 94. 5 94. 5 127. 0 92. 4 114. 4 107. 4 109. 4 110. 5 102. 6 48. 5 146. 1 142. 2 128. 8 109. 6 66. 2 171. 7 110. 0 109. 0 53.38 53.38- 0.0 0.00 0.00 53.38 53.38- 0.0 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 2.261. 315:00 244. 936. 25 2. 263. 476. 95 FUND TOTAL 2, 261. 315. 00 244. 936. 25 2, 263. 476. 95 2, 161. 95- 100. 0 2, 161. 95- 100.0 • FINANCE-FA484 • TIME 14:45:59 • r r r ., FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 EST REV PAGE 0006 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 25, 000. 00 2, 830. 99 39. 770. 47 14, 770. 47- 159. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 25, 000. 00 2, 830. 99 39, 770. 47 14, 770. 47- 159. 0 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3501 3502 /SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION 83.274. 00 5. 280. 74 . 69, 122. 49 14, 151. 51 83. 0 3503 /SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 169, 593. 00 11. 847. 60 145, 579. 39 24, 013. 61 85. 8 /SECT 2107. 5 ALLOCATION 4, 000. 00 0. 00 4, 000. 00 3522 /TDA ARTICLE 3 (S11821) 4, 869. 00 0. 00 4. 869. 00 0. 0. 00 100. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 261, 736. 00 17, 128. 34 223, 570. 88 38, 165. 12 0 185. 4 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 361, 816. 00 19, 739. 00 345. 499. 67 16, 316. 33 95. 4 361, 816. 00 , 19, 739. 00 345, 499. 67 16, 316. 33 95. 4 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 648, 552. 00 39. 698. 33 608, 841. 02 39. 710. 98 93. 8 FUND TOTAL 648..552. 00 39, 698. 33 608, 841. 02 39, 710. 98 93. 8 n • • •• ' r e • • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0007 TIME 14:45:59 FROM 05/.01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 1, 400. 00 160. 06 2. 635. 39 1, 235. 39- 188. 2 OBJECT SUB DOTAL 1, 400. 00 160. 06 2, 635. 39 1. 235. 39- 188. 2 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3601 /COUNTY AID TO CITIES 16, 000. 00 0. 00 16. 000. 00 0. 00 100. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 16, 000. 00 0. 00 16. 000. 00 0. 00 100. 0 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 17, 400. 00 160. 06 18, 635. 39 1, 235. 39- 107. 0 FUND TO TAL 17. 400. 60 160. 06 18. 635. 39 1, 235. 39- 107. 0 w • FINANCE-FA484 TIME 14:45:59 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION r 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 • • r r w • 3100 TAXES 3116 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3400 USE OF MONEY & 3401 3416 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3910 3955 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL /PARK REC FACILITY TAX PROPERTY /INTEREST INCOME /OIL ROYALTIES /PARK/RECREATION IN LIEU /BUDGETED TRANSFERS IN TOTALS EST REV 85. 000. 00 85,000. 00 15. 000. 00 0.00 15, 000. 00 185, 000. 00 0. 00 185, 000. 00 285, 000. 00 285. 000. 00 MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 27. 534. 00 62, 534. 00 27. 534. 00 62, 534. 00 1, 535. 72 21, 234. 91 717. 30 2, 591. 54 2, 253. 02 23, 826. 45 0. 00 159, 083. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 159, 083. 00 29. 787. 02 245, 443. 45 29, 787. 02 245, 443. 45 PAGE 0008 DATE 06/20/88 91.0%. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 22, 466. 00 73. 5 22.466.00 73.5 6.234.91- 141.5 2.591.54- 0.0 8,826.45- 158.8 25, 917. 00 85. 9 0. 00 0. 0 25, 917. 00 85. 9 39.556.55 86.1 39, 556. 55 86. 1 r,; FINANCE-FA484 TIME 14:45:59 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 126 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88. TO 05/31/88 EST REV PAGE 0009 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 3100 TAXES 3120 /UTILITY USER TAX 0.00 .57.682. 16 95.299.00 95.299. 00- 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 57.682. 16 95.299. 00 95,299.00- 0. 0 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY r 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 0.00 160.68 160.68 160.68- 0.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 160.68 160.68 160.68- 0.0 r DEPT 0000 TOTALS 0.00 57.842.84 95.459. 68 95.459.68- 0.0 • FUND TOTAL 0. 00 57, 842. 84 95, 459. 68 95. 459. 68- 0. 0 • r r c. r • FINANCE-FA484 TIME 14:45:59 r • • A r: r• • • 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0010 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 130 REVENUE SHARING FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 1.916.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1.916.00 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1.916.00 FUND TOTAL 1,916.00 189. 76 189. 76 189. 76 189. 76 4, 476. 84 4. 476. 84 4, 476. 84 4. 476. 84 2.560.84- 233.6 2.560.84- 233.6 2.560.84- 233.6 2.560.84- 233.6 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0011 TIME 14:45:59 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE % r 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 r 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3414 /FUND EXCHANGE 177.190.00 0.00 177,190.00 0.00 100.0 r`.'1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 177. 190. 00 0.00 177. 190. 00 0.00 100.0 3900 OTHER REVENUE r• 3955 /BUDGETED TRANSFERS IN 44.765.00 0.00 44,765.00 0.00 100.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 44.765.00 0.00 44.765.00 0.00 100.0 ii DEPT 0000 TOTALS 221,955.00 0.00 ' 221.955.00 0.00 100.0 • FUND TOTAL 221.955.00 0.00 221.955.00 0.00 100.0 • r • • • FINANCE-FA484 TIME 14:45:59 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION i r .145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE DEPARTMENT 0000 r 3100 TAXES 3117 /PROPOSITION A TRANSIT 183, 176. 00 13, 615. 00 145, 810. 00 r" 3121 SUBREGNL INCENTIVE FUNDS 108, 680.00 0.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 291, 856. 00 13, 615. 00 145, 810. 00 r 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 5, 000. 00 609. 56 . 9. 520. 32 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 000. 00 609. 56 9, 520. 32 • 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3852 /FARES, E8EA 1, 810. 00 127. 00 1, 604. 00 • 3854 /FARES, DIAL A RIDE 7, 800. 00 0. 00 2, 980. 05 3855 /BUS PASSES 3, 500. 00 280. 00 3, 160. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 13, 110. 00 407. 00 7, 744. 05 • •• • 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3911 /INTER -CITY REVENUE 30.000.00 0.00 33.873.50 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 59.298.00 4,927.00 54.373.67 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 89. 298. 00 4, 927. 00 88, 247. 17 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 399,.264. 00 19. 558. 56 251, 321. 54 FUND TOTAL 399.264.00 19.558.56 251.321.54 PAGE 0012 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 37, 366. 00 108, 680. 00 146, 046. 00 79. 6 0. 0 49. 9 4.520.32- 190.4 4.520.32- 190.4 206. 00 88. 6 4, 819. 95 38. 2 340. 00 90. 2 5, 365. 95 59. 0 3, 873. 50- 112. 9 4, 924. 33 91. 6 1.050. 83 98. 8 147, 942. 46 62. 9 147, 942. 46 62. 9 r r r • r. • • FINANCE-FA484 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TIME 14:45:59 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0013 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION UNREALIEST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE ZED ti 150 GRANT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /INTEREST INCOME 17.00 139.91 1,383.49 1.366.49- 8138.1 17.00 139.91 1,383.49 1.366.49- 8138. 1 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3523 3524 /CLARK COURTS 86-1-19095 20,000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 20, 000. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /PARKS IRRIG 86-1-19096 31.000.00 0.00 0.00 31, 000.00 0.0 ,51, 000.00 0.00 0.00 51.000.00 0.0 3700 INTERGOVERNMENT/FEDERAL 3701 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /FEDERAL AID URBAN 322, 241.00 0.00 0.00 322, 241.00 0.0 322, 241.00 0.00 0.00 322, 241.00 0.0 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 110, 983.00 9,248.00 101, 735.17 9.247.83 91.6 110, 983.00 9,248.00 101, 735.17 9.247.83 91.6 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 484, 241.00 9,387.91 103, 118.66 381. 122.34 21.2 FUND TOTAL 484, 241. 00 9, 387. 91 103, 118. 66 381, 122. 34 21. 2 0 c.. FINANCE-FA484 TIME 14:45:59 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION r 155 CROSSING GUARD FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 r • • • r r 3100 TAXES 3101 3103 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /CURRENT YEAR SECURED /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /INTEREST INCOME 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 TOTALS FUND TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05,01/88 TO 05/31/88 EST REV 73. 495. 00 5. 464. 00 78. 959. 00 233. 00 233. 00 0. 00 0. 00 79, 192. 00 79. 192: 00 MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 7. 075. 05 506. 41 7,581.46 236. 44 236. 44 0.00 0.00 7.817. 90 7.817. 90 68, 430. 02 3, 970. 56 72, 400. 58 1. 828. 97 1, 828. 97 0. 00 0. 00 74.229. 55 74, 229. 55 PAGE 0014 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 5.064. 98 93. 1 1.493.44 72.6 6.558.42 91.6 1.595.97- 784.9 1,595.97- 784.9 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 4.962. 45 93. 7 4.962. 45 93. 7 c • =; FINANCE-FA4H4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0015 ' TIME 14:45:59 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE r 160 SEWER FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 25,000.00 3,394.82 42, 612.13 17.612.13- 170.4 r ' : t OBJECT SUBTOTAL 25, 000.00 3,394.82 42, 612.13 17.612.13- 170.4 1- 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3602 /BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANC 5.000.00 0. 00 0. 00 5.000.00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5,000.00 0. 00 0. 00 5,000.00 0. 0 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3828 /SEWER CONNECTION FEE 30, 000.00 1.316.11 21, 456.44 8.543.56 71.5 3829 /SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 1,200.00 175.00 1,746.69 546.69- 145.5 II 3832 /SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN 8.000.00 825.00 9.568.12 1,568.12- 119.6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 39. 200. 00 2.316.11 32, 771. 25 6,428.75 83. 6 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3906 /IN LIEU SEWER FEE 63.000.00. 0.00 63, 292.00 292.00...- 100.4 r 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN - 800, 000.00 66.667.00 733. 336.33 66.663.67 91.6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 863, 000.00 66.667.00 _ 796, 628.33 66, 371.67 92.3 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 932. 200. 00 72, 377. 93 872, 011. 71 60. 188. 29 93. 5 0 r r • • A FUND TOTAL 932, 200. 00 72.377. 93 872, 011.71 60, 188. 29 93. 5 i • FINANCE-FA484 TIME 14:45:59 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 e- 4: FUND TOTAL 411 r r.. /OPERATING TRANSFERS IN TOTALS • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0016 FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 DATE 06/20/88 91.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 10, 000. 00 10. 000. 00 10. 000. 00 10. 000. 00 10.000. 00 10, 000. 00 10. 000. 00 10, 000. 00 • 10. 000. 00 10, 000. 00 10. 000. 00 10. 000. 00 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 100. 0 • 41`'! FINANCE-FA484 TIME 14:45:59 r r r • • f r r. r • • FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 705 INSURANCE FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /INTEREST INCOME 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL REPORT TOTALS TOTALS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 05/01/88 TO 05/31/88 EST REV 10. 000. 00 10. 000. 00 994, 485. 00 994. 485. 00 1. 004, 485. 00 1, 004, 485. 00 16. 911, 239. 00 MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE PAGE 0017 DATE 06/20/88 91.0%. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 71, 998. 31- 28.916. 02 18, 916. 02- 289. 1 71. 998. 31- 28, 916. 02 18. 916. 02- 289. 1 149. 752. 00 919, 605. 67 74.879. 33 ' 92. 4 149. 752.00 919. 605.67 74, 879.33 92.4 77, 753.69 948. 521.69 55.963.31 94.4 77.753. 69 1.498. 732. 24 948, 521.69 55.963.31 94.4 15, 498, 060. 51 1.413. 178. 49 91. 6 CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - MAY 1988 FUND NUMBER 001 105 110 115 120 125 126 130 140 145 150 155 160 180 705 GENERAL ACCOUNT 5/1/88 BALANCE_ CASH ADJUSTMENTS WARRANTS ADJUSTMENTS 5/31/88 BALANCE GENERAL LIGHTING DISTRICT PARKING STATE GAS TAX COUNTY GAS TAX PARK REC.FAC.TAX RAILROAD RT.OF WAY REVENUE SHARING CD BG PROPOSITION A FUND GRANT FUND $2,545,849.94 1,279,284.26 378,328.81 662,763.92 37,472.21 359,528.59 37,616,84 44,425.56 -0- 142,704.97 32,753.90 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT 55,353.90 SEWER MAINTENANCE 794,763.51 FIRE PROTECTION FUND -0- SELF INSURANCE FUND673,698.18 $7,04 ,5 4.59 $ 752,746.64 $ 44,376.16 259,426.86 17,417.54 - 0- 28,251.30 57,682.16 - 0- -0- 14,022.00 -0- 7,581.46 2,316.11 - 0- -0- $1,183,620.19 170,248.01 5,464.44 1,616.03 22,569.99 160.06 1,535.72 160.68 189.76 -0- 5,536.56 9,387.91 236.44 70,061.82 10,000.00 77,.753,69 374,921.11 $ 585,390.12 $ 43,993.59 77,855.14 19,688.04 - 0- 3,050.00 -0- -0- -0- 3,598.76 15,884.90 8,701.05 16,594.25 - 0- 62,507.42 837,263.27 $ 191,108.66 4,469.63 130,083.27 14,852.88 4,416.00 10,159.00 - 0- 7,677.00 - 0- 62.80 2,917.00 375.00 7,779.01 - 0- 373,900.5 $2,692,345.81 1,280,661.60 431,433.29 668,210.53 33,216.27 376,106.61 95,459.68 36,938.32 -0- 158,601.97 23,339.91 54,095.75 842,768.18 10,000.00 . 68,944.45 $7,392,122.37 RUST ACCOUNTS BALANCE RECEIVED, PAID BALANCE. STATEMENT BALANCE _y PAYROLL ASSET SEIZ./FORFEIT. CHECKING $7,076287.35 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $199,000.00 INACTIVE DEPOSIT - POLICE ASSET SEIZ./FORFEITURE $442,305.25 INTERtST RECEIVED TO DATE $ 3,146.54 $437,753.18 37,556.97 1,373.89 $ 40,702.41 $49,127.07 $437,744.05 -0- $437,744.05 $ 3,155.67 $42, x..86 338,93053 AR BRU MAY 20, 1988 TR A UR GENERAL PAYROLL ASSET FORFEIT. CHECKING OUTSTANDING CHECKS INACTIVE DEPOSIT BALANCE $ 456,805.01 3,485.34 38,934.86 4.9,221.21 211,299.46 357,921.55 7,275 , 287.35 7,633,208.90 11t3 • June 21, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 28, 1988 REQUEST TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN EXTENSION OF THE CONTRACT WITH SELF INSURERS SERVICE, INC. FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE CITY'S WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Man- ager to execute the attached addendum to the current contract for Workers' Compensation Claims Administration with Self Insurers Service, Inc. extending said contract through September 30, 1988. Background: In July of 1985 the City contracted with Self Insurers Service, Inc. (S.I.S.) for services related to the administration of the City's Workers' Compensation claims. Since that time the con- tract has been renewed annually. In May 1988 S.I.S. advised the City that it will no longer pro- vide claims service for California public agencies. Analysis: In order to provide the City opportunity to solicit another firm to administer our Workers' Compensation claims, S.I.S. has agreed to extent the current contract through September 30, 1988. This extension is at the current contract rate of 5750.00/month. In addition to administration of the City's Workers' Compensation claims, S.I.S. is also the administrator for the City's Liability claims. Although that contract does not expire until June 30, 1989, it allows for either party to cancel the agreement upon sixty (60) days written notice. Self Insurers Service, Inc. will exercize this option to be effective September 30, 1988. The Risk Management Department is soliciting proposals for both Workers' Compensation and Liability Claims administration services. Respectfully submitted, Concur: Robert A. Blackwood Risk Manager Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager to 4 SELF I SUREIZS SERVICE A ROLUNS BURDICK HUNTER CORP. SELF -INSURERS SERVICE. INC SUITE 300 17320 REDHILL AVENUE IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92714 714 • 261 • 1900 FACSIMILE 714 • 474 • 8970 June 6, 1988 City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attn: Robert Blackwood, Personnel Director Re: Workers' Compensation Claims Administration Dear Mr. Blackwood: This letter will confirm our recent discussion regarding an extension of the existing contract through September 30, 1988. The extension fee will be at the current 1987/88 contract rate as stipulated in the enclosed addendums. After the appropriate signatures, return one of the addendums so we will both have an original for our respective files. Thank you for your continued courtesy and cooperation during this transition period. Very truly yours, Self -Insurers Service, Inc. Hope J. F lett Regional Vice President HJS/bh 266 Encl. cc: Dee Huffman SELF�RERS ADDENDUM TO CONTRACT AGREEMENT This Addendum amends the contract for the 1987-88 term between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation, and Jardine Claims Management, acquired by Self - Insurers Service, Inc. on April 17, 1987. RECITALS The parties desire to amend said contract agreement between Self -Insurers Service, Inc. and the City of Hermosa Beach after discussion and letters on the subject. AGREEMENT The parties agree as follows: 1. The expiration date of the agreement is extended through September 30, 1988. 2. Service fees payable at the rate of $750.00 per month or $2,250.00 per quarter. Self -Insurers Service, Inc. By. Attest: By : Date: bh/2B3 / ope J llett Regional. ce President City of Hermosa Beach By: By: Date: SELFIIVSURER� SERVICE ADDENDUM TO CONTRACT AGREEMENT This Addendum amends the contract for the 1987-88 term between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation, and Jardine Claims Management, acquired by Self - Insurers Service, Inc. on April 17, 1987. RECITALS The parties desire to amend said contract agreement between Self -Insurers Service, Inc. and the City of Hermosa Beach after discussion and letters on the subject. AGREEMENT The parties agree as follows: 1. The expiration date of the agreement is extended through September 30, 1988. 2. Service fees payable at the rate of $750.00 per month or $2,250.00 per quarter. Self -Insurers Service, Inc. City of Hermosa Beach By. Attest: By: Date: 6 bh/2B3 Reg et e President By: By: Date: June 9, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council June 28, 1988 LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY POSITION IN SUPPORT OF AB 3063 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council (1) Take a legislative advocacy position urging enactment of AB 3063 and (2) request the City Clerk to so notify our Senate and Assembly representatives plus the author of the bill and the League of California Cities. Background: For approximately seven years, the staff, in conjunction with several other cities staff members, has been trying to effect a legislative change that would enable us to collect outstanding parking citations that were.uncollectable due to transfer of vehicle ownership. Eventually we banded together and formed the California Public Parking Association (CPPA) which now has a membership of over two hundred, represents sixty three cities, and employs a lobbiest, on a part time basis. Previous Hermosa Beach City Councils were supportive of our effort and attempted both in 1984 with Assemblyman Felando and again in 1986 with Senator Beverly, to encourage legislation that might solve the problem( without success. However, our approach, at that time, was different than what is now being proposed in Assemblyman Polanco's bill. The current City Council indicated, in our last budget workshop, that they would also be supportive of this effort, so once again we are "coming to the well". Analysis: You will be able to determine, from the attached background material and copy of the bill, that even the latest effort has been watered down a great deal. However, it is a start - "a foot in the door". if'. The proposed bill would require the DMV to establish a plan, by March 31, 1989, and implement a 24 -month pilot program, on or before December 31, 1989, to collect unpaid parking citations in cases where the owner has twenty-five or more citations and has transferred the ownership of the vehicle. Currently, the City of Hermosa Beach has approximately 58,000 unpaid parking citations, covering a span of three years. This represents, at face value, $1,044,000.00. We urge your support of this bill. General Services Director Concur: �� Kevin B. North6raft City Manager BACKGROUND MATER/AL AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 23,1988 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 5, 1988 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE -1987 8 REGULAR SESSION ASSEMBLY BILL No. 3063 Introduced by Assembly Member Polanco February 8, 1988 An act to add Sections MB; 8818; and 4880t 4764.1, 47642, 476L3, and 4764.4 to the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles. LEGISLATIVE COUNSELS DIGEST AB 3063, as amended, Polanco. Vehicles: driver's Iieenses; • identifieat on Bards Vin: financial responsibility ity Parking violations. - ung law requires the Department ef Meter Vehicles to obtain specified information for every application for veldele registration and every applieatioe fere drivers lieensc, and to keep that information ee ; es This bill would require the dept to establish a data eelleetion plan to faeilitate a eelnaputer pram for the ereesinsatehing ef vehiele registrant with the names of holders of drivers= lieenses: The bill would else rewire the dem to provide fee user fees to Bever development and operating Beats of the prog rsnb The department wre ld be required to report ib plae to the legislature en er before January 4; {e} Foisting law requires applications for drivers lieenses;' identifieation card% and vehiele registration to eentain s informatimk This hill would autherinte the meat to require applications for a drivers license and vehicle registration to include the applieaut4 true full stanift er variation es AB 3063 —2— deterrnMed by the department social seeurity neer er employer identifieatien mer; driver's keease mer; and vehicle identifying hers; as speeif ed. Those previsions would heeeme operative ea January 4; 49907 Existing law provides that the Department of Motor Vehicles is not required to attempt to collect undeposited parking penalties and administrative fees from a former registered owner of a vehicle whenever a vehicle is transferred • or not renewed for 2 renewal periods. This bill would require the department to develop a plan to establish a pilot program to collect parking penalties, regardless of whether a vehicle is transferred to collect fees to cover the costs of the pilot program, and to report.on the plan to the Legislature on or before March 31, 1989. The department would be required to implement a 24 -month pilot program by December 31, 1989, and submit reports thereon to the Legislature. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State -mandated local program: no. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SCAN 4: It is the intent of the 4 stature; ie 2 SECTION 1. Section 4764.1 is added to the Vehicle 3 Code, to read: 4 4764.1. The Legislature finds that there is a significant 5 loss'of revenue to local govearunents due to the present 6 inability of the department to collect unpaid parking 7 violation penalties is cases where the ownership of a 8 vehicle has been transferred It is, therefore, the intent of 9 the Legislature that the department, in cooperation with 10 parking citation processing agencies, shall develop a plan 11 to establish a pilot program by which parking violation 12 penalties and administrative fees may be collected 13 without regard to whether a vehicle is transferred 14 SEC 2 Section 47642 is added to the Vehicle Code, 15 to read 16 47642 Notwithstanding Section .4764, the 17 department shall, in cooperation with parking citation 1 —3 — AB 3063 1 processing agencies, develop a plan to establish a pilot • 2 program by which parking penalties and administrative 3 fees may be collected without regard to whether a 4 vehicle is transferred The plan shalt address, but not be 5 limited to, a review of the following: 6 (a) A method by which parking violators with 25 or 7 more notices of parking violations on file with the 8 department, can be identified and be made responsible 9 for payment of their parkingpenalties. The director may 10 establish a lower numerical threshold if it is determined 11 to be cost-effective. 12 (b) A system by which a common identifier can assist 13 the department in identifying any vehicles owned by the 14 same owner if a common identifier is deemed desirable. 15 SEC 3. Section 47643 is added to the Vehicle Code, 16 to read: 17 4764.3. The department, pursuant to Section 4763, 18 shall assess a fee to cover the costs of the pilot program. 19 SEC 4. Section 4764.4 is added to the Vehicle Code, 20 to read 21 4764.4. The department shall report on the plan 22 developed pursuant to Section 4764.2 to the Legislature 23 on or before March 31, 19199, and shall implement a 24 24 -month pilot program on or before December 31, 1989. 25 The department shall submit an interim report to the 26 Legislature evaluating the results of the pilot program by 27 January 1, 1991, and a final report; with recommendations, by July 1, 1991. 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 All matter emitted in this version of the MI appears in the bill as amended in the Assembly, Apra 5, 19811 (LL 11). 0 RALPH M.00HOA HERMAN SILLAS TIMOTHY H. B.YARYAN ROSE SLOAN JULIA E. SYLVA GARY M. MANDINACH ANN C. PUMAR EUGENE BUTTON OF COUNSEL F. VALLES L6PEZ * GONZALO VALLES* PABLO GALICIA* OCHOA a SILLAS ATTORNEYS AT LAW OVIATT BUILDING 617 SOUTH OLIVE STREET, SUITE 1010 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90014 TELEPHONE (213) 622-9170 TELEX (213) 622-0162 June 3, 1988 Ms. Marguerite Sturges, President California Public Parking Association City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: AB 3063 (Polanco). Dear Marguerite, SACRAMENTO OFFICE 910-K'STREET, SUITE 325 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 TELEPHONE (916) 447-3383 TELEX (916) 447-3495 BAY AREA OFFICE 505 14,E STREET, SUITE 300 OAKLAND. CA 94612 (415) 272-0544 MEXICO CITY OFFICE BOSOUE OE OURAZNOS NO. 65-507-8 BOSOUES OE LAS LOMAS 11700 MEXICO. O. F. (905) 596-68-48 PLEASE REPLY TO: SACRAMENTO I am pleased• to report to you and the Association that we have had legislative success on the "transfer of ownership" problem. After lengthy negotiations with numerous parties, we have reached an agreement with the DMV to undertake a two-year pilot program to collect unpaid parking citations in cases where ownership of the vehicle is transferred and the registered owner has twenty-five or more citations (this number may be reduced by the Director of DMV). Legislative Analyst has estimated, under this program, that Association members from local governments will collect roughly 3/4 million unpaid dollars in 1989-90, and $1.5 million in 1990-91. In addition, the Department will be actively pursuing a registration enforcement program which should bring in additional unspecified revenues for Association members. We are optimistic that, at the end of this program, significant progress on the Department's relational data base system will be made such that the transfer of ownership problems will be history. Although we still have some legislative hurdles yet to go, I am encouraged by the unanimous vote we received for CPPA in pass- ing AB 3063 out of the Assembly Ways and Means Committee earlier this week. The bill is now on the Assembly Floor. I am enclosing copies of the analyses of AB 3063 from the Department of Finance, - 1 - *ADMITTED ONLY IN MEXICO, D. F. Ms. Marguerite Sturges June 3, 1988 • Page Two Legislative Analyst, and the Ways and Means Committee for your information. If you have any questions, pleasedo not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, TIMOTH H. B. ARYAN THBY:emn Enclosures cc: California Public Parking Association Board of Directors Susan Slesinger, Acting Legislative Chairperson RALPH M. OCHOA HERMAN SILLAS TIMOTHY H. B.YARYAN ROSE SLOAN JULIA E. SYLVA GARY M. MANDINACH ANN C. PUMAR EUGENE BUTTON OF COUNSEL F. VALLES LOPEZ r GONZALO VALLES* PABLO GALICIA* TO: FROM: SUBJECT: OCHOA 8 SILLAS ATTORNEYS AT LAW OVIATT BUILDING 617 SOUTH OLIVE STREET, SUITE 1010 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90014 TELEPHONE (213) 622-9170 TELEX (213) 622-0162 MEMORANDUM May 27, 1988 Assemblyman Richard Polanco Timothy H. B. Yaryan AB 3063 - FISCAL IMPACT SACRAMENTO OFFICE 910 -K -STREET, SUITE 325 SACRAMENTO. CA 95814 TELEPHONE (916) 447-3383 TELEX(916)447-3495 BAY AREA OFFICE 505 1412. STREET. SUITE 300 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (415) 272-0544 MEXICO CITY OFFICE BOSOUE OE OURAZNOS N0.65 -507-B BOSOUES OE LAS LOMAS 11700 MEXICO.O. F. (905) 596-68-48 PLEASE REPLY TO: We discussed the fiscal impact of the AB 3063 pilot program with Carol Waggoner, Legislative Representative for DMV. The numbers look good. DMV estimates that it will cost $165,000.00 (plus $24,000.00 for the plan) per year to implement the pilot program outlined in your bill. DMV plans to charge a S2.00 fee per offender. This fee will gernerate $210,000.00 per year. DMV estimates that it can recover about .$1.4 million* annually (approximately S1,026 per offender) from offenders with 25 or more parking tickets. *This sum will go to the Courts and to Local Government. THBY:emn cc: Kathleen O'Leary, Legislative Assistant to Assemblyman Richard Polanco California Public Parking Association Board of Directors Susan Slesinger, Acting Legislative Chairperson *ADMITTED ONLY IN MEXICO, D. F. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE ANALYSIS Author: Polanco Amended: 5/23/88 Bill No.: AB 3063 Policy Committee: Transportation Vote: 11 - 0 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Disclaimed: Hearing Date: 6/1/88 Staff Comments By: Allan Lind � �; y Summary • This bill would require DMV to develop a plan to establish a pilot program to collect parking penalties, regardless of who owns the vehicle. (In other words, selling your car won't throw the'parking violation.hounds off your case for unpaid parking tickets). The bill would also require DMV to develop a fee schedule to pay for the costs of the pilot program. The bill would also require DMV to report to the Legislature by 3/31/89 on the plan and implement the plan by 12/31/89. Fiscal Undetermined, probably minor costs to DMV from the Motor Vehicle Account to develop a plan. Undetermined costs to DMV to administer a pilot program for collecting parking fines; costs would be offset by fees to be determined by DMV. Potential revenue gain to local agencies from collection of parking penalties that would otherwise go uncollected. Comments The bill does not include any measures for judging the public benefit of the proposed pilot program. Staff suggests the following amendment to guard against unleashing an inappropriate pilot program. On page 3, line 23, after "shall", insert: demonstrate to the satisfaction of the fiscal and relevant policy committees that the costs of the pilot program can be reasonably recouped from fees and that the pilot program will result in a net revenue gain for all local agencies who participate in the pilot. Provided that the pilot program is shown to be cost effective, the department may AL:srh ' ! e• Honorable Richard Polanco Member of the Assembly State Capitol, Room 2188 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Assemblyman Polanco: DEPARTMENT Finance AUTHOR Polanco -BTLL NUMBER AB 3063 SPONSORED BY RELATED BILLS AMENDMENT -DATE May 23, 1988 The Department of Finance has withdrawn its opposition to your bill May 23, 1988. Our position on the bill is now neutral. BILL SUMMARY as amended UNPAID PARKING VIOLATION PENALTIES This bill would require the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), in cooperation with parking citation processing agencies, to develop a plan to establish a pilot program to collect parking violation penalties and administrative fees without regard to whether a vehicle is transferred. SUMMARY OF CHANGES This version of the bill makes the fallowing major changes from the previous analysis of the April 5, 1988 version of the bill. - The bill has been completely recast to require DMV to develop a plan to establish a pilot program to collect parking violation penalties and administrative fees, regardless of whether a vehicle is transferred. The bill no longer deals with the development of .a plan to facilitate the cross-matching of vehicle registrants with holders of drivers' licenses. FISCAL SUMMARY --STATE LEVEL SO Code/Department LA Agency or Revenue CO Type . RV 2740 - DMV SO 1614 - Miscellaneous Revenue RV (Fiscal Impact by Fiscal Year) (Dollars in Thousands) Code FC 1987-88 FC 1988-89 FC 1989-90 Fund C $216 044 MVA* *Motor Vehicle Account Impact on State Appropriations Limit --No FISCAL SUMMARY --LOCAL LEVEL Reimbursable Expenditures Non -Reimbursable Expenditures Revenues IMP 4= MP AM U 105 044 • MVA* 1 1 Neutral epar 105 719 irec or . 'a e rePrincipal Analyst,Date (751) J. Dong sa6f88 Program Budget Manager Date Governor's Office (700) Susanne Morgan Position noted u..� la� S /�/ Position approved �a, r �pncition disapproved (2) • BILL ANALYSIS/ENROLLED BILL REPORT --(Continued) Form DF -43 AUTHOR AMENDMENT DATE BILL NUMBER Polanco • May 23, 1988 AB 3063 ANALYSIS A. Specific Findings _ Under current law,•parking citation processing agencies are authorized to file unpaid parking penalties, including administrative fees, with DMV for collection at the time of vehicle registration. DMV is prohibited from renewing the registration of any vehicle if the registered owner, rentee or lessee has outstanding unpaid parking violations on his/her record, except as specified. However, if the ownership of the vehicle is transferred to another person, DMV is unable to refuse registration renewal since the vehicle is no longer associated with the previous owner who accumulated the unpaid parking violations. This bill would require DMV, in cooperation with parking citation processing agencies, to develop a plan to establish a pilot program to collect parking penalties and administrative fees without regard to whether a vehicle is transferred. The plan would focus on parking violators with. 25 or more notices of parking violations on file with DMV. DMV would be required to report on the plan to the Legislature by March 31, 1989, and to implement a 24 -month pilot program by December 31, 1989, with an interim report evaluating the results of the pilot program by January 1, 1991, and a final report, with recommendations, by July 1, 1991. DMV would be required to assess a fee to cover the costs of the pilot program. DMV has been working with the author's office to develop legislation to help local governments collect unpaid parking violations. This version of the bill represents a compromise agreement between DMV and the author's •office. B. Fiscal Analysis DMV advises that there are about 21,000 vehicles with 25 or more parking violations filed. It estimates that about 25 percent, or 5,250 of these vehicles would be transferred annually. Of that number, about 80 percent, or 4,200 vehicles, may potentially be matched to other vehicles registered to the same owner. However, only one-third, or 1,386 vehicles, would actually result in the collection of unpaid parking violations. Based on• the above, DMV estimates one-time implementation costs of $164,000 (primarily for EDP) in early 1989-90. The collection process would not begin until January 1, 1990. At a cost of $3 per collection, DMV would incur costs of $52,000 in 1989-90 and $104,000 in 1990-91. At a charge of $2 for each vehicle matched, DMV would receive revenues of $105,000 in 1989-90 and $210,000 in 1990-91, sufficient to cover the costs of the program for -the first 18 months. Thereafter, the fee could be reduced to $1 to cover costs during the last 6 months of the program. Revenues collected for local government from unpaid parking citations, based on an average $41.48 per citation, would be $719,000 in 1989-90 and $1,437,000 in 1990-91. 0(4- w":) Legislative Analyst May 26, 1987 ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 3063 (Polanco) As Amended in Assembly May 23, 1988 1987-88 Session Fiscal Effect: Cost: Increased costs to the Motor Vehicle Account (MVA) to implement a pilot program to collect specified parking penalties; fully reimbursed by fees, as follows: January -June Full Year July -December 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 $200,000 A.$100,000e1v $50,000 Revenue: Increased revenues of approximately $1.5 million to local governments in each year of a two year program from parking penalty revenues. Analysis: This bill requires the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to establish a pilot program to collect parking penalties regardless of whether a vehicle's registration has been transferred to another person. Specifically, the bill: • Requires the pilot plan to address a method for DMV to collect parking penalties on vehicles with 25 or more parking violations. ' 1.t!. �r�// -••••••••• ( C ( C C 4 C AB 3063--contd -2- Requires the department to (1) assess a fee to cover the costs of the program; (2) to report to the Legislature by March 31, 1989 on the pilot plan, (3) to implement a 24 month pilot program by December 31, 1989, and (4) to submit an interim report to the Legislature on the results of the pilot program by January 1, 1991, and a final report, with recommendations, by July 1, 1991. Under current law, the local agency that processes parking violations can request the department to collect the parking penalties with registration fees. The department is required to refuse registration to those vehicles unless the penalties are paid. But the department is not required to collect parking penalties from a former registered owner of a vehicle whenever a vehicle is transferred or not renewed for two renewal periods. This bill would require the department to collect parking penalties in these instances. Fiscal Effect The department estimates that there are 21,000 vehicles annually that have more than 25 parking tickets, and that 4,200 of these vehicles are registered by a person that did not receive the parking tickets. Futhermore, the department estimates that it will sucessfully collect parking fines on one-third of these vehicles. We estimate that the department would incur costs of approximately $200,000 in 1988-89 (one-half year), approximately $100,000 in 1989-90, and approximately $50,000 in 1990-91. These costs would be completely reimbursed by a citation administration fee, which the department estimates would be $2 per citation. Costs in 1988-89 would include computer programming AB 3063--contd -3- ( implementation costs and costs to collect and process parking citations, while costs in subsequent years would consist entirely of collecting and processing the citations. We estimate that parking citation revenues in each year of the two year program would be approximately $1.5 million. These revenues would accrue to local • • governments. 83/s18 t 4 d R June 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 14, 1988 REPORT ON NEED ASSESSMENT STUDY AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN ALTERNATIVES FOR POSSIBLE CITY HALL EXPANSION, CIP 88-609 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Receive and file this report. 2. Consider this project as part of the 5 -year Capital Improvement Program. Background: The Hermosa Beach City Hall was constructed in 1964. The building was designed with the basement level used primarily as a storage area. The structural framework was designed to support a third -floor level to be added during future expansion. Over the last two decades, significant changes have occurred in regard .to City functions and staffing levels. The Planning Department was ' added and located in the basement. General Services and the Police Department were also accomodated in the basement. Staffing levels have increased to meet the growth in•public service needs by Hermosa Beach, residents. As a result, storage space in City Hall has been limited. Paper , products are currently stored in mechanical rooms and stairwells. Some plans and blueprints are stored in the Community Center. On March 2, 1988 BOA Architecture provided the City of Hermosa Beach with its findings on a Needs Assessment Study analyzing the space requirements for City Hall. The findings were based on current needs and estimated future needs five years in advance, compiled from the results of a survey distributed to department heads and employees during September of 1987. The Needs Assessment Study is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. Three preliminary design alternatives were recommended: Schemes A, B and C. Analysis: This analysis will be divided into the following sections: 1. Comparison of Useable Space 2. Description of Schemes A, B & C 3. Comparison of Alternatives 4. Fiscal Impact lh 1. Comparison of Usable Space The results of the architect's survey are listed below for each function, showing usable floor space in existence now as well as space required and provided for in Schemes A, B and C. FUNCTION City Manager City Attorney City Council City Clerk Planning Buildg. & Safety General Services Public Works . Personnel Finance/Treasurer Police Department Community Resources Copy -Room Kitchen Lunch -Room Basement Storage Future Expansion EXISTING REQR'D. SCHEME A SQ.FT. SQ.FT. 516 114 365 735 1286 1350 260 874 4546 off-site 104 102 604 516 547 78 153 814 1361 1657 2072 1269 804 1320 3910 236 108 604 458 2491(4) 492 116 ---(1) 310 1088 1212 1462 1020 317 890 4155 236 108 604 458 SCHEME B 874 204 336 779 1279 1368 2250 1292 816 1138 4155 n/a(2) 236 108 604 458 2491 SCHEME C 684 72 216 410 1455 1727 1466 1472 536 1078 4n/a(3) 236 108 604 412 VIM 4=11, TOTAL: 12,329 17,882 12,468 18,388 NOTE: Square Footages are based on usable space only and reflect'.service and support areas (i.e. mechanical rooms, lobbies, etc.) 16,275 do not restrooms, Shared space with other department. Community Resources may be placed in Future Expansion. Increased area can be utilized as future expansion or storage similar to Schemes A and B. Scheme C allows for increase in property and evidence, exercise and training rooms. Architect's estimated space for future expansion and storage space. 2. Descriptions of Schemes A, B & C Scheme A (No Major Addition): 2,NO FLA. NEW SKYLIGHT ",,,,,,,,%7-- I''T PLR.. ATRIUM COUNCIL CHAMBER SCHEME A bfrobEMENT POLICE FACILITY Additional usable floor space: 139 sq.ft. (1% increase). Estimated cost: $959,166 Scheme A utilizes systems furniture; a modular partitioned furniture system which has storage areas and work surfaces integrated into units which can be arranged to use floor space more efficiently. The existing Police Department firing range in the basement would be utilized for office and storage space. The central courtyard between the Council Chambers and the City Hall offices would be enclosed with a skylight to provide public seating and reception areas. Finally, the existing public restrooms adjoining the courtyard area would be upgraded to meet current handicap requirements. Partition changes would occur: 1. In the basement: Police Department firing range, operations division, locker rooms; Planning Department and General Services - computer -room. 2. 1st Floor: Public Works and Building Department 3. 2nd Floor: Finance Department, City Manager and Personnel Department. Scheme B (Third Floor Addition): 2.140 FLIT— ATRIUM 1 'T KR NEW SKYLIGHT COUNCIL CHAMBER .SCHEME B &ASEMENT POLICE FACILITY Additional usable floor space: 6,059 sq.ft. (49% increase). Estimated Cost: $1,740,511 A third floor level would be constructed above the existing two floors. A structural investigation would be required to determine if the existing structural framework is adequate to support an additional level. Originally, the building was designed for a third floor, but building codes, especially seismic regulations, have changed significantly since then. As in Scheme A, a new skylight over the courtyard would be installed, the first floor public restrooms upgraded and the existing firing range in the basement remodeled for office and storage space. Partition changes would occur in the basement similar to Scheme A. On the first floor, partitions would be relocated to accomodate Finance and Personnel Departments. The 2nd Floor would be changed to accomodate the offices of the City Manager, City Clerk, City Attorney and Council Members. The added third floor would house the Planning, Building and Safety and Public Works Departments and would extend over the existing Council Chambers. 3 Scheme C (3 -Level South Expansion) i I S? FLR. NEW SKYLIGHT COUNCIL CHAMBER SCHEME C bi.,oemeNT POLICE FACILITY Additional usable floor -space: 3,930 sq.ft. (32% increase). Estimated Cost: $1,405,827 Scheme C would extend the basement, 1st floor and 2nd floor to approximately 19 feet to the South. As in Scheme A, the new skylight would be added and the first floor public'restrooms upgraded. The partition changes in the basement would be similar. On the first floor the offices in the Building and Safety and Public Works Departments would be rearranged. On the 2nd floor Finance, Personnel, the City Clerk's and the City Manager's areas would alsohave their office space rearranged within the existing floor area. The departments would not be totally relocated in .Scheme C. In Scheme C each department would, more or less, expand its existing space to the South. 3. Comparison of Alternatives The analysis section is outlined as follows: 1. Scheme A 2. Scheme B 3. Scheme C The advantages and disadvantages of each alternative are discussed. The statements regarding disruption of City Hall functions and flexibility for reorganizing City Hall departments are opinions of the architect. Staff agrees with the architect's opinions as stated below. 1. Scheme A: A. ADVANTAGES: I. Lowest Cost Scheme A is the lowest cost alternative compared to B and C. Scheme A is $781,345 less than Scheme B and $446,661 less than Scheme C. 4 II. MINIMUM OF DISRUPTION Scheme A would disrupt City Hall functions less than schemes B or C. No departments would have to be totally relocated. (There would be some disruption, since each department would undergo wall relocations and furniture changes.) B. DISADVANTAGES: I. Short Term Solution Scheme A does not allow for future growth; it merely uses existing space more efficiently. Space needed for future employees and storage is not provided for. II. No Re -grouping Scheme A does not allow for the grouping of Planning, Building and Safety and Public Works consistent with City Council's goal. 2. Scheme B: A. ADVANTAGES: I. Long Term Scheme B provides the necesssary space for City Hall's future requirements for staff offices, public service and storage. II. Greatest Flexibility: Scheme B offers the greatest flexilblity of the three options. The departments could be reorganized and relocated by functions. B. DISADVANTAGES: I. Highest Cost Scheme B is the most costly of the three options. II. Relocation of Staff Since Scheme B calls for a major reorganization of City Hall, some City Hall staff would need to be relocated during the construction period. 3. Scheme C: Scheme C falls between Schemes A and B in regard to advantages and disadvantages. I. Cost Scheme C has a cost which is less than Scheme B but more than Scheme A. 5 II. Disruption Scheme C would cause less disruption than Scheme B but more than Scheme A. Departments would be expanded but not relocated. III.Short Term/Long Term Scheme C provides for less future growth than Scheme B but for more growth than Scheme A. IV. Flexibility Scheme C has less flexibility than Scheme B but more than Scheme • A. Planning, Building and Safety and Public Works departments could not be consolidated into the same floor. 4. Fiscal Impact: CIP 88-609 was listed as a possible Capital Improvement Project for FY 88-89. The total estimated cost is listed as ranging from $250,000 to two million dollars. The project is presently unfunded. City Council has the option of making CIP 88-609 part of the 5-year.Capital Improvement Program. Summary: Design options A, B and C all encompass a major investment in time and money to provide for space requirements in City Hall. Below is a chart which shows total cost and construction time for each option. Design Construction Inspection System Furniture Contingency Total Cost: Approximate Construction Time Only (does not include design) Alternatives: 1. Drop the project. Respectfully su mitted, Scheme A $ 51,649 516,490 34,088 271,201 85,737 $959,166 6 months Brian Gengler Assistant Engineer Concur: Kevin B. Northcfraft City Manager Scheme B. Scheme C $ 102,259 $ 87,550 1,022,591 ' 875,496 67,491 57,783 378,420 239,666 169,750 145,332 $1,740,511 $1,405,827 12 months 9 months An Rony Antich Director of Pu•lic Works Noted for � Fiscal Impact: 1146% Viki Copeland Finance Administrator CITY MANAGER COMMENT: This item is intended to update the Council on this continuing project. Prior to full consideration of these options, a guided tour for the Council will be arranged to view first hand the issues involved. June 21, 1988 City Council Meeting June 28, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES The following claim(s) have been submitted to the City Clerk's office: Brian Sullivan, 1824 Manhattan Avenue, represented by Charles Eric McCurdy, Atty., 10960 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1808, Los Angeles 90024, filed June. 13, 1988 alleged injury to ankle and foot due to irregular sidewalk. Jeff Jordan, 2450 Via Campesina, Palos Verdes Estates 90274, filed June 14, 1988 - alleged bicycle injury due to firehose on the Strand. Torrance Nissan, 20710 Hawthorne Boulevard, Torrance 90503, filed June 16, 1988 - alleged vehicle damage by City equipment. Hap Jacobs, 2224 Thorley Place, Palos Verdes Estates 90274, filed June 20, 1988 - alleged damage by truck to house and basketball hoop at 650 Beach Drive. Recommendation: To deny claim(s) and refer to City's Claims Administrator. Note: The above claim(s) are available for review in the office of the City Clerk. Concur: City Manager i-<&-/tizemYAzzVez27-44-) KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk June 20, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 28, 1988 REQUEST FOR 30 DAY EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT POLICE RECORDS ADMINISTRATOR Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council extend for thirty (30) days the temporary appointment of Acting Police Records Ad- ministrator Gayle Brown. Background: The previous Police Records Administrator resigned on September 25, 1987. Police Services Officer Gayle Brown was appointed as Acting Police Records Administrator on September 25, 1987 pending development of the class specification for that position. This review is necessitated by the reorganization of the Police Department to include in-house dispatching of Police and Fire units. Section 2-33 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code precludes the temporary appointment of an individual for more than six months without, on a 30 day at a time basis, approval from the City Council. Analysis: An Individual Job Analysis Questionaire has been completed by the individual currently assigned as Police Records Administrator and reviewed by the Department. Information obtained from that ques- tionaire as well as a position analysis completed by the previous Records Administrator will be utilized to develop a revised class specification. The proposed class specification will be submit- ted to the Council for approval at the July 12, 1988 meeting. Following approval of the class specification by the Council, a civil service test will be scheduled. R-spectfully submitt Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Concur: Kevin B. North -craft City Manager 11 June 21, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council June 28, 1988 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RE: ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING FIRE FLOW FEE SR 88-1 LOCATION: CITY WIDE INITIATED BY FIRE DEPARTMENT Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council grant a Negative Declaration for the attached ordinance regarding establishment of fire flow fees. Background The Staff Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of June 23, 1988, recommended a negative declaration for the proposed ordinance. A copy of the Environmental Information form is attached. Abstract An environmental assessment for this project is required pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Analysis The Fire Department has initiated the fees to upgrade fire protection because the present fire protection flow system is substandard for new construction within the City. The proposed ordinance will add a fee per square foot of new construction. Staff is recommending a Environmental Negative Declaration for this project since there are no substantial environmental impacts associated with the fees. The fees will provide a positive impact since the fees will allow for the replacement of the substandard fire hydrants. Attachments 1. Staff Review Minutes of 6/23/1988 2. Environmental Information Form 3. Ordinance 88-932 1 CONTINUED -- Staff Report SR 88-1 CON ichael- Sdbubach Planning Diirector, Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager A/ccsrfire 2 Res • ctfiu sut i tted, An Perea Associate PI\ginner PROJECT SR 88-1 ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A FIRE FLOW FEE TO UPGRADE FIRE PROTECTION. Motion by Mr. Grove to recommend a negative declaration, second by Mr. Peres. No objections, so ordered. June 23, 1988 3 st-gRe4. PL, .Lai , 6/I/s s4 NATURAL RESOURCES (State Designated Form) ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be completed by applicant) Type or Print Legibly Date Filed / /1,M GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name and address ofdeveloperor projectsponsor:"sponsor: C1-�—j � 4 eh w,osF4 c C�CeCV 1 I—Iy 131 \Jc� -�-(� (r RB �C4 9'0754, 2. Address of project: g02_,€_—Lf 3. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: -t"C\% e_ tN 1 5 11 I e_ to K I .1 . c>b1 f c 4. Indicate number of the permit application for the project to which this form SIR pertains: 5. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 11) ( A 6. Existing zoning district: C� —wid 7. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): , ofs-%lbljshv er-F . LF 4—cv e -Plow Pe -6 U� ya.cdc ri re l -i-, c,Qho,,` PROJECT DESCRIPTION 8. Site size: 9. Square footage 10. Number of floors of construction 11. Amount of off-street parking provided: vk ) ( y 12. Attach plans. 13. Proposed scheduling: 14. Associated projects: vv) rpr 15. Anticipated incremental development: VV A- 16. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, and type of household size expected: () (t- 17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally orientated square footage of sales area, and loading facilities: VO 1- 18. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: VO 1 19. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: kik) 1y- 20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required: 01 }�— Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO / ✓ 21. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills or substantial alteration of ground contours. ✓� 22. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. 23. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. 24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. 26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 28. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. 29. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. 30. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 32. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. - S-(-zJ t S h v(✓��ev`+ OP Fire `om � O co -Pe e, -47) di) -e 14 f 34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. DATE G 1 NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 21803 and 21807, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sections 21000-21176, Public Resources Code. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND. II •nt�-- 1. Name of Proponent C 4—c pP `� 1 W10EA- fccCi 2. Add ess and Phone Number-ef Proponent: 1 5 (S \I .br•-• �-2� keY1O 5- aGk CA- c(02 S -(- 3 e —tact 4 � e\it-.3c 3. Date of Checklist Submitted: (p t i (o 1 4. Agency Requiring Checklist . (d,,v-vh tut` 5. Name of Proosa1, if applicable es-�J0 S ('1 mer �— r S — -+-t ij[ Dui -Pee 4-z) --qi r e �l II. ENVIRONMENTAL I.MPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) YES NO MAYBE 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geological sub -structures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Chagnes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geological hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deteriroation of • • YES NO MAYBE ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or in the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? d. Change in . the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or . in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alterations of the direction or rate of low of ground waters? h. Substantial .reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal SMIIMMMOIMI ,7 ,/ replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will, the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shelfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers . of any unique, rare or endangerd species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing .fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise. Will the proposal . result in: a. Increase in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of peopleto severe noise levels? 7. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present • or planned land use of an area? 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? 11. Population. Will the propos! alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YES N0 / MAYBE L_ 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing g housing, or create a demand for. additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alternations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazardds to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? YES NO MAYBE 14. Public Services. Will . the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection b. Police protection c. Schools d. Parks or other recreational facilities e. Maintenance of public facilities, including / roads f. Other governmental services __ 15. Energy. Will the poroposal result in: / a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ ✓ b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities, Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power o natural gas. b. Communications systems. `�� c. Water. t/ d. Sewer or septic tanks. e. Storm water drainage. __ f. Solid waste and disposal. —/ 0— t/ 17. Human Health. Will the. proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health?) b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources: Will the proposal: a. result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? b. result in adverse phyusical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric building, structure, or object? c. have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential for degrate the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitate of a fish or wild life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten , to eliminate important examples of the major peroids of California history or pre -history? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future?) —11- YES NO MAYBE C. c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? . (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impcat on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impcats on the environment is significant?) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial severe effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? YES NO MAYBE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 • 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDINANCE NO. 88- 932 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ESTABLISHING A FIRE FLOW FEE TO UPGRADE FIRE PROTECTION AND TO ASSIST CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS TO MEET UNIFORM FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City. of Hermosa Beach recognizes the serious problems with the water system within the city which creates fire risks when new construction increases density and/or fire exposure; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach desires to establish a system in which improvements are made to the fire water flow protection system in order to increase the level of fire protection within the city; WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish a fire protec- tion water system for developments in which the burdens added to the system by new development are paid for by the developers of projects; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that all additions of new dwelling units and/or additional square footage to existing structures increases the demand on the fire protection system within the city; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the City of Hermosa 25 Beach was originally developed as a less dense resort community 26 and has since developed into a highly developed, densely packed 27 28 W.114- 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 residential community which has placed additional burdens on the fire protection water system; WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that improvement of the fire protection water system will benefit existing as well as new development; WHEREAS, the City Cot'incil finds that a relationship exists between new construction and the need to install, upgrade, and replace fire hydrants and other improvements to the fire protec- tion water system to improve fire protection and prevent the spread of fires from building to building; WHEREAS, the City Council finds a direct relationship between new development in all zones of the City and the need for fire system improvements overall; WHEREAS, the City Council finds the purpose of this fee is to finance improvements in fire protection facilities to reduce the impacts of increased density in residential, commercial and man- ufacturing areas brought on by the addition of buildings and the expansion of existing buildings within the city; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the fire protection fees collected pursuant to this interim ordinance shall be used to finance only the public facilities described or identified in Exhibit "A," attached hereto; WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows: A. After considering the study and analysis prepared by staff and the testimony received at this public hearing, the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Council approves said staff report, and incorporates such herein, and further finds that new development in the City of Hermosa Beach area will generate additional fire protection needs within the city and will contribute to the degradation of fire safety in the city; B. There is a need in the City of Hermosa Beach for addi- tional fire hydrants, hydrant replacements and upgrades in as- sociated facilities which have not been constructed or have been constructed, but new development has not contributed its fair share towards these facility costs and said facilities have been' called for in or are consistent with the city's Safety Element of its General Plan; C. The facts and evidence presented establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities and the impacts of the types of development. described in paragraph 3 below, for which the corresponding fee is charged, and that there is also a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development for which the fee is charged, as these reasonable relationships or nexus are in more detail described in the staff report referred to above; D. The cost estimates set forth in the staff report are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs; and WHEREAS, the materials in this study were available for public inspection and review fourteen (14) days prior to this public hearing. - / - • 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Purpose. In order to implement the goals and objec- tives of the Safety Element of the General Plan of the City of Hermosa Beach and to mitigate the fire protection impacts caused by new development in the City of Hermosa Beach, certain public fire protection improvements must be or had to be constructed. The City Council has determined that a development impact fee is needed in order to finance these public improvements and to pay, for the development's fair share of the construction costs of these improvements. In establishing the fee described in the following sections, the City Council has found the fee to be con- sistent with its General Plan and, pursuant to Government Code Section -65913.2, has considered the effects of the fee with respect to the city's housing needs as established in the Housing Element of the General Plan. On an annual basis, the City Coun- cil shall review this fee to determine whether the fee amounts are reasonably related to the impacts of developments and whether the described public facilities are still needed. Section 2. Fire Protection Improvement Fee. A Fire Protection Fee is hereby established on issuance of residential building permits for development in the city to pay for the fire protec- tion measures described in Exhibit "A," attached.. hereto. This development fee shall be paid by each developer prior to issuance of a building permit. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 3. Fee Account. The revenues raised by payment of this fee shall be placed in a separate and special fund and such revenues, along with any interest earnings on that fund, shall be used solely to pay for the city's construction of facilities described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto in the manner specified under Section 7 set out below. Section 4. Fee. (a) Residential Development That Adds Less Than Three Units. For new residential development, the fee shall be equal to fifty, cents ($0.50) per square foot for the construction of two or less dwelling units. For a new residential dwelling unit which rep- laces an existing residential dwelling, the fee shall be equal to fifty cents ($0.50) per square foot for the additional square footage of the new dwelling unit. Said square footage shall be calculated by subtracting the square footage of the demolished legally permitted structure from the square footage of the newly constructed dwelling unit. For existing residences that add floor space, the fee shall be equal to fifty cents ($0.50) per square foot of floor space added. Square footage shall be calcu- lated by using the methods found in the most recently approved 'edition of the Uniform Building Code adopted by the City of Her- mosa Beach. (b) All Other Developments. For residential developments that add three or more units to existing residential density, more than 5,000 sq. ft., or any non-residential development within the city, the development shall be liable for the actual cost of improvement which benefits the project or a fee equal to • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 fifty cents ($0.50) per square foot of floor space, whichever is greater. The square footage shall be calculated in the same man- ner as subsection (a). Section 5. Alternative Requirements. For projects of less than three units which received a building permit after July 1, 1987 must provide the fire protection improvements as a condition of approval, said developers may pay the fees established under this ordinance in lieu of providing the improvements required. Section 6. Use of Fee. The fee shall be solely used to pay (1) for the described public facilities to be constructed by the city; (2) for reimbursing the city for the development's fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the city; or (3) for reimbursing other developers who have con- structed public facilities as described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto, where those facilities were beyond that needed to miti- gate the impacts of the other developers' project or projects. Section 7. Notice and Imposition Date. This ordinance was adop- ted at a noticed public hearing, at which time the City Council - also considered the associated studies which were available to the general public for a period of at least fourteen (14) days prior to the public hearing. This fee shall apply to the is- suance of any building permit, for any residential development issued 60 days following this ordinance's adoption and for all other types of development 30 days following its adoption. Section 8. Clerk Prepared Synopsis. The City Council shall designate the City Clerk to prepare a summary (synopsis) of this -18- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ordinance to be published pursuant to Government Code Section 36933(c)(1) in lieu of the full text of said ordinance. Section 9. Publication of Synopsis. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause a synopsis (summary) of this ordinance to be pub- • lished in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circu- lation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. Section 10. Effective Period of Ordinance. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall en-• ter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings Of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS ' .TH DAY OF , 1988. ATTEST: PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY A HIBIT "A" FIRE PROTECTION MEASURES SUBJECT TO FIRE PROTECTION FEB 1. HYDRANTS 2. RISER CONNECTIONS FROM MAIN TO HYDRANT 3. NECESSARY VALVES AND ATTACHMENTS AS DETERMINED BY THE WATER COMPANY 4. REPAIRS TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS STREETS AND SIDEWALKS NECESSITATED BY THE INSTALLATION OF HYDRANTS, RISERS AND NECESSARY VALVES'AND ATTACHMENTS June 23, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 28, 1988 RECONSIDERATION OF CARETAKER UNIT IN THE MANUFACTURING ZONE Recommendation: That the Council authorize reconsideration of a text amendment to the zoning ordinance to add caretaker unit in the Manufacturing zone subject to a conditional use permit and standard conditions. Background: A small area of the mini -storage building directly south of City Hall at 552 - 11th Court was used for many years for a variety of commercial uses. These uses include a cabinet maker and a secretarial service. In 1986, the manager of the mini -storage purportedly contacted City Hall to see if that area could be converted to a caretaker unit due to flooding problems. The code allowed such a unit at that time, but no building permit was applied for at that time. In January, 1987 the zoning code was amended to eliminate caretaker units from the manufacturing zone. The subject area was apparently remodeled and rented in 1987, which caused the City to abate the illegal unit. The new manager then requested a text amendment to allow personal mini -storage in the M zone and to provide for a caretaker unit. Planning Commission and City Council actions then took place as follows: October 20, 1987 - Planning Commission approves personal mini -storage in the M zone and caretaker unit by a 2-1 vote; November 24, 1987 - City Council approves personal mini -storage in the M zone by 5-0 vote, and refers caretaker unit back to Planning Commission to provide better standards by 3-2 vote; February 2, 1988 - Planning Commission sets standards and requires a conditional use permit for caretaker units in the M zone by a unanimous vote; March 8, 1988 - Following no public testimony, the City Council unanimously received and filed this staff report (Mayor Simpson absent.) Analysis: Council has previously expressed concerns about the length of time the illegal unit had been in operation. Also, the chronology of events described above was not previously made 1 m available to the Council. For these reasons, it is appropriate to reconsider this matter and allow the applicant to address the Council at a future meeting. The City Attorney advises that this reconsideration can be done since the Council filed the staff recommendation on March 8 as opposed to rejecting it. evin B. Korth, aft City Manager 1CBN/ld CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager FROM: William Grove, Director of Building and Safety RE: Caretakers unit at 552 llth Place DATE: June 23, 1988 The referenced unit first came to our attention in March of 1987. An exchange of letters between my office and the management company to clarify the issues resulted in them applying to the Planning Commission on May 15, 1987 to have caretakers units added as a permitted use. They abated the illegal unit within a month of filing the request with the Planning Commission. Mr. Kowalski, representing the management company, was cooperative in attempting to resolve this matter at all times. HERMOSA MINI STORAGE 552 ELEVENTH PLACE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 April 28, 1988 "REQUEST FOR SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD CARETAKER UNIT IN MANUFACTURING ZONE SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND STANDARD CONDITIONS." BACKGROUND The owners of Hermosa Mini Storage moved into (and started operations at) 552 _Eleventh Place in February 1979. The parking lot for the facility is shared with the City of Hermosa Beach, who owns over fifty percent of it. We definitely feel that there are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances applicable to this request. We have the same requirements as all other mini storage facilities that have (in other areas) caretakers living on the property. In addition, we have the unique and extraordinary requirement to dispose of all surface water from the entire property, including the parking lot, that is generated from any rain(s). Eight years ago, the City made a recommendation on a certain size pump to handle our water plus the water from the City parking lot. We installed a pumping system at considerable cost and found that it was grossly inadequate --and that we actually incurred some flooding. Because of this experience, we replaced that system with a superior system at a cost of $12,000.00. However, we realized that should this pump ever fail for more than a few minutes, the entire building would be flooded out in any major storm. Therefore, as an additional precaution, we installed a back-up gas pumping system in the event the storm should cause an electrical outage. Because the system handles an immense amount of water, the caretaker is required to be on the premises after hours if there is any possibility of rain. With an excess of 300 tenants' storage occupying the building and because everybody's storage becomes "extremely valuable, antique, irreplaceable," etc. in the event of damage, we are acutely aware of this enormous potential liability. And because the City owns more than fifty percent of this parking lot and the resultant runoff, we feel the City must also surely share in our concern. Last year, this situation became even more critical when an additional 15,000 square feet (approximately) of roof surface area rain water was diverted to the pumping station. Previously, this water was discharged out through a vacant lot to Eleventh Street. After this vacant lot was sold and construction on it had begun, the City suggested that we carry this water to the pumping station rather than require the lot's new owner to provide for its disposal. We complied and therefore put a great additional burden on the system. The granting of this caretaker unit would not in any way be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property. The direct opposite is true. By having the caretaker on the property to assure the proper functioning of the pumping station, we will prevent the very real possibility of hundreds of Hermosa Beach residents getting their business and/or personal belongings flooded. A caretaker would also greatly reduce the potential liability to Hermosa Mini Storage as well as the potential liability of the City of Hermosa Beach. A caretaker would also help prevent damage and loss to the real property as well. We do not believe in any way that the granting of this caretaker unit would adversely affect the comprehensive general plan. Nor do we see the slightest possibility that the City would be opening "Pandora's Box". The likelihood of a similar caretaker unit ever being requested would be extremely remote. The restrictions laid out by the Planning Director, along with the requirement for a conditional use permit, would virtually eliminate any possibility of other caretaker units being in the manufacturing zones. My company was hired by the owners of Hermosa Mini Storage to manage their business property approximately twenty-two months ago, after the previous manager returned to his native Belgium. When I assumed the management, I then learned that the area designated for the caretaker had been completely remodeled except for minor things such as paint, floor coverings, window coverings, and some furnishings. I also learned that this same area was minimally equipped for a caretaker unit previous to this latest remodeling. It is my understanding from a number of people that this previous manager (my predecessor) had checked with the City of Hermosa Beach on zoning requirements and had found that at that time there was a provision for a caretaker unit in the manufacturing zone. He proceeded with that understanding. Unfortunately, he apparently did not realize that he also needed a permit to undertake the required remodeling. The owners of Hermosa Mini Storage have in the past worked very closely with --and cooperated in every way with --the City of Hermosa Beach in cleaning up the area, in building and sharing parking facilities, and in solving the surface water drainage problems. These owners are two very fine, extremely hardworking responsible citizens who put their trust in a property manager who, unfortunately, was not as capable in all areas as he had led them to believe. What we are asking for now is reciprocal help and cooperation from the City in order that we might solve the current problem with our caretaker unit, thereby greatly reducing chances of many fine Hermosa Beach citizens having their goods ruined --as well as greatly alleviating vast potential liabilities for both the owners of Hermosa Mini Storage as well as the City of Hermosa Beach. Respectfully submitted, GUARDIAN PREFERRED PROPERTIES, INC. Gean G. Iowalski, CPM President GUARDIAN PREFERRED PROPERTIES, INC. 3756 Tibbetts Street • Riverside, California 92506 (714) 683-6170 April 28, 1988 Mr. Kevin Northcraft City Manager Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mr. Northcraft: It was suggested by the Planning Commission Chairman, Mr. Gerald Compton, that I meet with you in order to review our mutual problem of surface water --in conjunction with Hermosa Mini Storage's need for a caretaker unit. Accompanying this letter is a brief background explanation concerning this subject. The request for a Text Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to add a caretaker unit was initially approved by the Building Department as well as the Planning Director --and subsequently approved by the Planning Commission. The request was, however, rejected by the City Council for alleged lack of controls and sent back through channels for more restrictions to be added. The Planning Director then did add many more restrictions, including the requirement for a conditional use permit, before sending the request back through the Planning Commission --where it was again approved. When this issue came before the City Council the second time, we --the Planning Director, the Building Director, and myself --were all totally confused and greatly distressed when the City Council voted to shelve the request with virtually no discussion concerning it. The owners of Hermosa Mini Storage are appealing to you for your help and respectfully submit a request to the Mayor and City Council of Hermosa Beach, asking them to please take another serious look at this request. The allowing of a caretaker unit in this very unusual and extraordinary circumstance will greatly reduce the chances of many good Hermosa Beach citizens having their goods ruined, as well as reduce the liability to the City and to the owners of Hermosa Mini Storage. At the same time, all of the many restrictions as imposed by the Planning Director will completely assure the City's total control in the matter. Thank you very much for your consideration and any assistance you may be able to give. Respectfully yours, GUARDIAN PREFERRED PROPERTIES, INC. Zwa.�sacv/L. Gean G. Kowalski, CPM jk Copies to: Mr. Richard Thielscher Mr. Gene Randall - Owners, Hermosa Mini Storage etion: To approve the staff recommendation and intro- duce Ordinance No. 88-920 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARD TO THE DEFINITION, LOCATION AND COM- .PUTATION OF OPEN SPACE AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARA- TION" with amendments to page 1, line 20 adding "in the R-1 zone." and page 2, lines 5 and 6 as follows: "areas or over living areas ofwthe same dwelling_unj.t when ac- cessible through the interior of the dwelling unit." Motion Williams, second Creighton. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. 6. TEXT.AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE,20.OF THE.ZONING;opINANCE TO ES AB SH AN ENFORCEMENT NFRACT ON '.ROCE COND - 1 A rS P RMIT,VIO_ATI.#$. Memorandum from Planning irector Michael Schubach dated March 1, 1988. The staff report was presented by Planning Director Michael Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak was William Simas, 121$ - 5th Street. The Public Hearing was closed. Ac�ti n: To approve the staff recommendation and intro- ud ce Ordinance No. 88-921 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A TEXT AMENDMENT ESTABLISHING PENALTIES FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT VIOLATIONS." Motion Williams, second Creighton. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpsom. HEARINGS 7. SPECIAL STUDY.AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ZONING.VRDDNANCE To £Db dARETAKER_ UN�jT. IN MANUFACTURING ZONE �SU�.T , T, TO A l0HbIT10$kl4 USE PER(II* AND STANDARD _CONDiTZONS. Memo- randum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 1, 1988. The staff report was presented by Planning Director Michael Schubach. The Hearing was opened. No one coming forward, the Hearing was closed. Action: To receive and file the report. of on Creighton, second Williams. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. MUtIICIPAL _MATTERS 8. A. MID -YEAR BUDGET EVIE - 1': -88 FI C YEAR. Continued from Fe•ruary 23, 19:: meeting. Memo- randa from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft and - 9 - Minutes 3-8-88 APPENDIX A—ZONING § 900 Sec. 8.5-9. Permits issued. Upon final approval of the commercial planned development by the city council, permits may be issued for grading, uses, buildings a structures which are in substantial conformity with the app ved final development plan and the conditions imposed, if an "Substantial conformity" shall be determined by the planning mmission. (Ord. No. N. S. 451, § 1, 3-6-73) Sec. 8.5-10. Appeal. Any person may appeal the decision of the planning com- mission on any matter connected with the "statement of development criteria", the reliminary development plan, or the final development plan, hrough procedures set forth in Article 14 of Zoning Ordinanc o. N. S. 154, as amended. (Ord. No. N. S. 451, § 1, 3-6-73) Sec. 8.5-11. Term of commercial plann d development. If within six months after the final ap . oval of the com- mercial planned development the constructio set forth there- in is not begun, the commercial planned develo ; ent becomes null and void. The planning commission may ex : d the time start construction upon a showing of good cause. (Ord. No. 3 . S. 451, § 1, 3-6-73) Article 9. "M" Manufacturing Zone ("M" Zone Sec. 900. Permitted uses. In an "M" zone only the following uses are permitted as hereinafter specifically provided and allowed, subject to e provisions of article 11.5 governing off-street parking uirements : (1) Any use permitted in the "C" zone except hotels, motels and auto courts; provided, that a dwelling con- �orming to the requirements of the R-3 zone shall hs permitted on the same lot on which a use permitted herein is located and which dwelling is used exclusively by the owner, lessee, caretaker or superintendent and his family. PP. No. 3-73 June 20, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council June 28, 1988 PROJECT TOUCH LEASE AGREEMENT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission approve the attached lease agreement between the City and Project Touch for additional space in the Community Center and forward to City Council for final approval. BACKGROUND Project Touch presently leases Room C in the Community Center, located on the first floor across the hall from the Community Resources office. They have been tenants since October, 1979. Room 11 became available when Palmer Drug Abuse terminated their lease agreement effective March 28, 1988. ANALYSIS The lease space for Room 11 is 400 sq. ft. with a monthly rental of $280. ($.70 sq. ft.) This rate will be in effect for the duration of the one year lease. Concur: Kevin B: Northgr'aft City Manager 1 Respectfully submitted, Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 28th day of June , 1988 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and Project Touch (Lessee). A. RECITALS: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of one (1) year commencing on the 1st day of July _,198a , and ending on the 30th day of June ,1989 . 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room 11 400 sq. ft. 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac- cording to the following schedule: July 1, 1988, to June 30, 1989: $280/mo.. $.70 sq. ft Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of the following month. 3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises except such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such signs shall be in accordance with the policy established by the Lessor. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Counseling services And for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Depratment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee promises to hold the City harmless from any claims, causes of actions or damages of any nature whatever arising from Lessee's use of the premises and will pay the City any monies to which the City may become obli- gated because of Lessee's use of the premises. Lessee shall, if so instructed by the City, cause any occupants of the premises to execute a document in a form prepared by the City wherein that occupant shall expressly waive any right of ac- tion against the City for damages for any injury sustained because of Lessee's use of the premises. 10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal- ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: Project Touch 710, Pier Avenue ,Hermosa Beach, CA 9025 Attn: Julie Dorr Feys. Cr Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first hereinabove set forth. ATTEST: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY LESSEE: June 20, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council June 28, 1988 PROJECT TOUCH LEASE AGREEMENT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission approve the attached lease agreement between the City and Project Touch for additional space in the Community Center and forward to City Council for final approval. BACKGROUND Project Touch presently leases Room C in the Community Center, located on the first floor across the hall from the Community Resources office. They have been tenants since October, 1979. Room 11 became available when Palmer Drug Abuse terminated their lease agreement effective March 28, 1988. ANALYSIS The lease space for Room 11 is 400 sq. ft. with a monthly rental of $280. ($.70 sq. ft.) This rate will be in effect for the duration of the one year lease. Concur: Respectfully submitted, a€ Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 28th, day of June 1988 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and Project_Touch (Lessee). A. RECITALS: • 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of one (1) year commencing on the 1st day of July _,1988 , and ending n the 30th day of June ,o1989 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room 11 400 sq. ft. 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac- cording to the following schedule: July 1, 1988, to June 30, 1989: $280/mo. _ $.70sq. ft Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of the following month. 1 3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises except such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such signs shall be in accordance with the policy established by the Lessor. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Counseling services And for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Depratment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee promises to hold the City harmless from any claims, causes of actions or damages of any nature whatever arising from Lessee's use of the premises and will pay the City any monies to which the City may become obli- gated because of Lessee's use of the premises. Lessee shall, if so instructed by the City, cause any occupants of the premises to execute a document in a form prepared by the City wherein that occupant shall expressly waive any right of ac- tion against the City for damages for any injury sustained because of Lessee's use of the premises. 3 10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal- ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: Project Touch 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attn: Julie Darr Feys_ Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first hereinabove set forth. ATTEST: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 5 LESSEE: June 21, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council June 28, 1988 CHILD ABUSE MONTHLY REPORT RECOMMENDATION -It is recommended that City Council receive and file the attached report. Concur: Kevin B. Northcr.aft City Manager 1 • Respectfully submitted, Atana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources ONO .3 0 .•I 0 1 3 0 3 ,1 3 3 RICH GRAPHICS. HERMOSA BEACH. CALIF. 221S766•CP CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PURCHASE ORDER This Purchase Order is not valid without authorized signature. PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER DATE 6-16-88 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001 -400 -4601 -4201 - REQUESTED BY Mastrian All Purchases are subject to the conditions printed on the reverse side of this sheet Mail two (2) copies of your invoices - c/o Finance Department, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-0299. South Bay Coalition/Alive 320 Knob Hill :`, C. Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Attn: Mary Castagna'...: ,.: r : I 4882 DELIVER MERCHANDISE TO CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH c/o Distribution Area Warrant No.: QUANTITY UNIT - DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL • . , 'Payment according to Agreement with the City of Hermosa Beach . City Council` approved- Aug.,: 1987 .-'' . . See attachments .. ..•... ; ,i,, • :y„ ., : : $1,000 • TOTAL $1,000 I hereby request this order ORIGINAL I hereby certify that this order is authorize( CITY MANAGER RECEIPT OF MATERIAL ; 1 heretsy certify that the goods or services as spedfed hereon have been •end that th quant! - s a s are properly stat Date tends Available); � RECEIVING COPY +tax :<.a tavironmo4lu , . ` Date -fAPPROVAL FOR PAYMENT' -f This Involve approver] for payment in the"`emou'nt -n* . r `. ... ... t & Date 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .19 20 21 22 23 24 • 25 26 27 28 w .CONTRACT FOR SERVICES This AGREEMENT made this 11th day of'August. 1987 between the South Bay Coalition for Alternatives to Domestic Violence, an independent contractor, hereinafter referred to as the CONTRACTOR and*the City of Hermosa Beach; a duly authorized governmental entity, hereinafter referred to as the CITY. ,ARTICLE 1. TERM OF CONTRACT " • Section 1.01. This Agreement shall become effective on • September 1, 1987t and shall 'continue to June 30, 1988. —ARTICLE 2. 'SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR. • ^ Section 2.01. 'CONTRACTOR ,agrees to ,perform the services specified in the "Description Services" attached to this Agreement and incorporated .by reference herein. • —.-e-7-:ARTICLE 3. COMPENSATION. ' Section 3.01. In consideration for the services to be performed by CONTRACTOR, CITY agrees to•pay to CONTRACTOR: ten thousand dollars 10 000: � , .. Said amount to be paid in ten �(�10)• equal installments. CONTRACTOR will submit to CITY a statement of services perzformed within twenty (20) days of the prior months service. CITY agrees to pay the amount due to CONTRACTOR for services within fourteen (14) days upon receipt of invoice. • c • ARTICLE 4. OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR. South Bay Coalition/ ALIVE! Statement June 15. 1988 To: City of Hermosa Beach Re: Services performed by South Bay Coalition/ ALIVE! for the Child Abuse Resource, Education and Prevention Program of Hermosa Beach. Summary of activities: Family Violence Council Seven meetings were held for human service professionals in Hermosa Beach and surrounding cities at Little Company of Mary Hospital. Topics that were addressed included: - "Working with Adult Incest Survivors" - "Growing Up in the Nuclear Age" - "The Pedophile- A Police Interview" - "Traumatized Children" - "Men Who Batter: Treatment Programs" - "Family Law, Issues" - "Parent Education Issues" The average number of 55 practitioners who attended these forums benefitted greatly from the subject information. networking with colleagues and professionals from several different disciplines. Professionals and community people from Hermosa Beach attended each meeting. Child Abuse Directory A 1988 Child Abuse Directory was printed in February. Services and programs of twenty-one agencies covering prevention, treatment, and education about child abuse were included. Although all of these agencies are not physically located in Hermosa Beach. their outreach area includes Hermosa. All of the listed programs and services are available to Hermosa residents. Copies of this Directory were distributed to the school district offices, police department, library, city offices, other locations, and upon request to individuals in the City. Legislation Information on pending California legislation regarding child care and child abuse was furnished as available in previous reports. Included with this year-end summary is the most recent update by ON CAPITAL DOORSTEP on the status of bills now under consideration. CONFERENCE: "Beyond Survival: A Journey Through the Healing Process" This Conference was presented as requested under terms of the Contract. The Mayor and City Council of Hermosa were sent personal letters inviting their attendance. This Community Forum provided the opportunity for professionals and lay people in the South Bay to explore the effects of personal traumas such as loss or decline of a loved one, rape, painful war experience. child abuse or natural disaster. The purpose was to emphasize the common elements of pain experienced by all victims of psychological trauma and their families, and to give practical tools for moving beyond the pain. • "Beyond Survival" took place in two parts, on April 21 and 22. The first was an original drama, drawing an audience of 150 people who represented student groups, churches, community.at large, and human service practitioners. Part II, the daylong Conference at Hermosa Beach Community Center, also drew 150 people. A Resource Fair was an important component of the Conference, as it made available to all attending a wide • selection of relevant literature and tapes concerning the emotional healing process. Information about accessible local support programs and services was also given. "Beyond Survival" was a resounding success, as measured by the number and range of attendees, verbal and written evaluations, and the high quality of the speakers, presenters, and the original drama. Judging from the eager participation of so many people in "Beyond Survival" and the requests of many who attended for a repeat next year. ALIVE! believes that this special community event served an important need for people to focus on carrying on with a healthy life despite the pain suffered from any type of emotional trauma. It wasa positive approach to problems that can get caught in lifeloing pain. ALIVE! Newsletter Quarterly issues of ALIVE! were mailed to many Hermosa Beach residents and distributed at City Hall, the library, school district office, Chamber of Commerce office, and other places. It has been a pleasure for the South Bay Coalition/ ALIVE to work with the City of Hermosa Beach in providing these programs and services. We feel that we have significantly benefitted many residents of Hermosa Beach who have suffered the pains of child abuse and/or domestic violence within their families. Again, our emphasis is on education. prevention, networking, and getting the word out that victims of child abuse and their families need not be isolated and hopeless. There is good. accessible, affordable help available! Submitted by /714fLy Mary Castagna, Executive Director South Bay Coalition/ ALIVE! June 15, 1988 June 22, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 28, 1988 AWARD OF BID FOR EXCESS WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council award the bid for the City's Excess Workers' Compensation Insurance to Employers Rein- surance Corporation for a deposit premium of $26,986. Background: In September of 1985 the City contracted with Cal-Surance Associ- ates, Inc., for services regarding the purchase of the City's excess workers' compensation, property, and vehicle damage in- surance coverages. Mr. Mark Zahoryin, Vice President of Cal-Surance, has advised this department that, as of this date, Employers Reinsurance is the only company to respond with a quotation for bidding on the City's excess workers' compensation coverage. Additionally, this year the brokerage firm of Marsh & McLennan was authorized to obtain a quote for this coverage. Marsh & McLennan is the Broker of Record for the I.C.R.M.A. While they identified eight (8) different carriers, the Cal-Surance bid is more competitive and allows the City to choose a higher limit of coverage. The City's current excess insurance coverage for workers' compen- sation claims expires June 30, 1988. This coverage is with Em- ployers Reinsurance Corporation and affords the City statutory coverage with a $200,000 self-insured retension (S.I.R.). It is recommended that the City maintain a statutory limit and a S.I.R. of $200,000. A statutory limit provides coverage regard- less of any judgement amount awarded. While the potential for a loss even at a $10 Million level is, at best, a remote possibili- ty, it is the fortuitous loss that should be insured against. The City would be responsible for payment of a loss above the $10 million limit in the event of a catastrophic loss. Analysis: Employers Reinsurance Corporation submitted the attached quota- tions. The recommendation is to accept Quote #I on the attached which maintains the City's current level of coverage. This quotation reflects a 14.9% rate increase. The approved budget for Fiscal Year 88/89 appropriated 526,000 for the excess in- surance premium. The following table displays a comparison of the current premium to the recommended: Current: Recommended: Increase: Percentage: Premium $22,390 Premium S26,986 Premium S 4,596 20.5% Rate: .4250/$100 of payroll Rate: .4883/$100 of payroll Rate: .0633/5100 of payroll 14.9% 14 Quotations from General Reinsurance provided by Marsh & McLennan did not include a Statutory limit. The quote which would allow the City to maintain a $200,000 S.I.R. had a a S10 million cap and was at a rate of .4485 per $100 of payroll as compared to the Employers Reinsurance quote of .4475 for the same coverage sub- mitted by Cal-Surance. Since the premium paid is a function of payroll, the initial pre- mium is considered a deposit premium. An audit is conducted at the close of the fiscal year and the premium is adjusted based upon actual payroll. Alternatives: 1. Accept quotation #IV on the attached for coverage with a S.I.R. of $200,000 and a limit of $10 Million. This option would result in a 5.3% rate increase with a deposit premium of S24,731. This premium is $2,255 less than the recommended. Respectfully submit Robert A. Blackwood Risk Manager Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copean Finance Administrator Concur: i1 Kevin B. Nort craft City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXCESS WORKERS COMPENSATION QUOTATIONS JULY 1, 1988 TO JULY 1, 1989 CURRENT QUOTE I QUOTE II QUOTE III QUOTE IV QUOTE V QUOTE VI COMPANY: EMPLOYERS EMPLOYERS EMPLOYERS EMPLOYERS EMPLOYERS EMPLOYERS EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE REINSURANCE REINSURANCE REINSURANCE REINSURANCE REINSURANCE REINSURANCE CORPORATION CORPORATION CORPORATION CORPORATION CORPORATION CORPORATION CORPORATION RATING: A+:XV A+:X A+:X A+:X A+:X A+:X A+:X ADMITTED ADMITTED ADMITTED ADMITTED ADMITTED ADMITTED ADMITTED LIMIT/ STATUTORY STATUTORY STATUTORY STATUTORY $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 ACCIDENT: EMPLOYERS $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 LIABILITY: S.I.R.: 200,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 PAYROLL: 5,268,353 5,525,702 5,525,702 5,525,702 5,525,702 5,525,702 5,525,702 RATE: .4250 .4883 .4266 .3926 .4475 .3794 .3456 MINIMUM DEPOSIT PREMIUM: $22,390 $26,986 $23,577 $21,698 $24,731 $20,972 $19,095 6-21-88/106r CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, INC. OVER 25 YEARS OF SERVICE June 21, 1988 Mr. Bob Blackwood City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 RE: Excess Workers Compensation Policy Policy #C35153 Current Carrier: Employers Reinsurance Corporation Expiration Date: July 1, 1988 Dear Bob: We have been able to obtain quotations for your Excess Workers Compensation insurance as per the attached quotation schedule. The current carrier, Employers Reinsurance Corporation, has given us six different quotes. Please review the attached quotation schedule and should you have any questions, please give either myself or Mark Zahoryin a call. We have quoted to date with only the Employers Reinsurance Corporation, and have submitted your information to General Reinsurance Corporation for their quotation. As yet, we have not received a quotation from General Reinsurance Corporation. Upon receipt of such quotation, should it be any lower or more advisable for your operations, we will forward that quotation. I was advised by Mark Zahoryin that you would be making a decision on the Excess Workers Compensation by June 28th. Please let me know as soon as possible as to the findings of the City Council. Respect f ly, ands ccount Administrator Enclosure A Member of the Cal-Surance Group Mailing Address P.O. Box 3459, Torrance, CA 90510 2790 Skypark Drive, Torrance, CA 90505 (213) 530-5555 LA (213) 772-3151 June 22, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 28, 1988 SANITARY SEWER DESIGN CIP 87-405 AUTHORIZATION OF NEW NOT -TO -EXCEED COST FOR DESIGN AGREEMENT Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council approve a new not -to -exceed cost for sanitary sewer design CIP 87-405 for Harris & Associates in the amount of $50,227. Background: 'On November 10, 1987 City Council awarded the agreement for sanitary sewer design, CIP 87-405, to Harris & Associates at a cost not to excced $43,648. At this time the design is approximately 90% complete for this project. Three changes in the scope of work will push design costs beyond the not -to -exceed amount: 1. additional surveying required to locate necessary benchmarks on Valley Drive between Herondo Avenue Pier Avenue, 2.. design for an additional storm drain between Pier and 13th Street,• 3. additional sewer design in the vicinity of Middle (1645 Valley Drive). and Avenue School Staff considers these additional services essential for the proper design of this project. Analysis: The additional costs for the three Original Contract Cost Additional Surveying Additional Storm Drain Design Additional Sewer Design 5% Contingency Cost Not To Exceed 1 changes are explained below: $39,680 1,840 2,552 3,764 2,391 350,227 Fiscal Impact: Noted below is the estimated budget for this project: Plans, Specifications and Estimates $ 50,227 Construction 900,000 Inspection 90,000 Contingency 48,773 TOTAL: Funding source: Sewer Fund. No additional appropriation is required. Respectfully submitted, • Brian Genglerr Assistant Engineer Concur: Kevin B.'Northcraft City Manager BWG/umv 2 Concur: $1,089,000 Anthony An is Director of P blic Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator June 23, 1988 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL June 28, 1988 SOUTH BAY CORRIDOR STEERING COMMITTEE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the following: 1. The City enter into a Joint Powers Agreement Extension with the Cities of Carson, El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, Inglewood, Lawndale, Lomita, Manhattan Beach, Palos Verdes Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Redondo Beach, Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Estates, Torrance, and Los Angeles to continue participation in the South Bay Corridor Steering Committee. 2. Approve a membership fee totalling $100.00 to be transferred from the Prospective Expenditure Account into the City Council Membership Account. BACKGROUND On September 10, 1981 the South Bay Corridor Steering Committee was formed for a term of three years. In 1985 an extension was enacted for an additional term of three years to terminate June 30, 1988. ABSTRACT The South Bay Corridor Steering Committee was formed to develop a comprehensive, cooperative transportation plan to serve the transportation needs of the South Bay Area. The fee of $100.00 is not a requirement for membership. ANALYSIS The study consists of three phases: Phase I - defines the transportation needs of the area, along with policy and guideline determinations. Phase II - develops and analyzes alternative solutions, costs enefits, and environmental and community impacts and restraints in the South Bay Area. Phase III - develops implementation programs for the Phase II recommendations. The South Bay Corridor Steering Committee will address all these phases. 1 CONCUR: �1G/wiz / Mic ael SchuKach Planning Director /r��� 'Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Respectfully . itted, isa Bre`ieg ber Planning Aide NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Vicki Copeland Finance Administrator 4 AN AGREEMENT FOR AN ADDITIONAL EXTENSION OF TERM OF THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE SOUTH BAY CORRIDOR STUDY PHASE III (IMPLEMENTATION) AND FOR THE INCLUSION OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES This Agreement, made and entered into this day of , 1988, by and among the South Bay Cities, a group bf cities consisting of the cities of Carson, El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Lawndale, Lomita, Manhattan Beach, Palos Verdes Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Redondo Beach, Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Estates, Torrance and Los Angeles, each of which is a municipal corporation, duly, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, all of which collectively shall be hereinafter referred to as "CITIES"; W I T N E 8 SET H: WHEREAS, the South Bay Cities, with the exception of the City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles and State of California have formed a transportation study team (South. Bay Corridor Study Steering Committee) to develop a comprehensive, cooperative transportation plan to serve the transportation needs of the South Bay area; and WHEREAS, Phase I of the study comprehensively defined the transportation needs of the area, along with policy and guideline determinations; and WHEREAS, Phase II developed and analyzed alternative solutions, costs/benefits, environmental and community impacts and constraints with respect to common transportation problems in the South Bay Area, and established necessary data for a research base; and WHEREAS, PHASE III developed implementation programs for recommendations contained in Phase II, recommended priorities of projects and developed means of financing for implementation; and • WHEREAS, by Agreement dated September 10, 1981, the term of Phase III was extended for an additional term of three years, and WHEREAS, by an extension of that agreement the parties extended the term until June 30, 1988, and; WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the term of Phase III for an additional five years; and WHEREAS, the City of Los Angeles is situated within the transportation system area and desires to be included as one of the South Bay Cities participating in Phase III. NOW, THEREFORE, CITIES, for and in consideration of the mutual benefits, promises -and agreements set forth herein, do agree as follows: 1. That the Joint Powers Agreement for the South Bay Corridor Study Phase III (Implementation) attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference, (hereinafter "Joint Powers Agreement") be and hereby is extended for an additional term of five years, terminating on June 30, 1993. 2. That, pursuant to Section 10 of the Joint Powers Agreement, the City of Los Angeles shall be permitted to participate in Phase III provided the City of Los Angeles fulfills the requirements of Section 5 of the Joint Powers Agreement. 3. This Agreement shall become operative and binding upon the parties hereto upon execution by all of such parties, in which event its effectiveness shall be measured from July 1, 1988. 4. The.. covenants, conditions, promises and agreements contained in the Joint Powers Agreement are incorporated herein by reference and shall be binding upon the parties -hereto with the exception that none of the CITIES will be subject to any expense, assessment, financial or budgetary contribution or any other type participation of financial liability by their except as already provided for in said extended Phase III Agreement without the review and advance consent thereto by each said City's city council. 5. Upon the expiration of this Agreement, further participation may be extended in accordance with Section 2C of the aforesaid Joint Powers Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and attested by the proper officers thereunto duly"authorized, their official seals to be hereto affixed, as of the date first above written. CITY OF CARSON CITY OF INGLEWOOD By BY ATTEST: ATTEST: Date CITY OF EL SEGUNDO CITY OF LAWNDALE Date By By ATTEST: • ATTEST: Date Date CITY OF GARDENA CITY OF LOMITA By By ATTEST: ATTEST: Date Date GNP 5- CITY OF HAWTHORNE CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH By By ATTEST: ATTEST: Date Date CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES By By ATTEST: ATTEST: Date Date CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES By By ATTEST: ATTEST: Date Date CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CITY OF TORRANCE - By By ATTEST: ATTEST: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Date Date CITY OF LOS ANGELES By ,BY ATTEST: ATTEST: Date Date WGQ:wm/147:5-31-88 '. • CITY COUNCIL CHARLES BELBA HAROLD S. CROYTS HAL HALL ROBERT T. HARGRAVE PETER J. ROSSICK June 17, 1988 CITY OF LOMITA Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers South Bay Corridor Steering Committee Member Cities Dear Members: At the last meeting of the Committee, the City Delegates budget of $1,200 for the membership assessment of $100 budget. The monthly expenses Committee Coordinator secretarial services, contingency fund ($20). ADMINISTRATION WALKER J. RITTER CITY ADMINISTRATOR DAWN TOMITA CITY CLERK South Bay Corridor Steering approved our annual operating Committee and a voluntary to provide the revenue for the include meeting expenses for the (approximately $25); postage ($5.); stationery, printing ($50) and a The assessment is voluntary because we cannot assess any dues or other charges without an amendment to the Agreement. The voluntary assessment is a good alternative to trying to amend the Agreement and casting an assessment "in concrete". You can send thevoluntary assessment, payable to the South Bay Corridor Steering Committee, to Dawn Tomita, City Clerk, City of Lomita, P.O. Box 339, Lomita, CA 90717. Your continued participation in and support of the Steering Committee's goals and objectives are mutually beneficial to our cities. Sincerely, HARD D S . CROYTS �Jz.5 — b4 / D MAYOR CHAIRMAN, SOUTH BAY CORRIDOR STEERING COMMITTEE Bar( SiCVC:''S0 n C$ (g) ZAc 3 —OO$S _7 CITY HALL OFFICES • 21.300 NARBONNE AVENUE. LOMITA. CALIFORNIA 90717 • (2131323-7110 V 1..• FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME . __DESCRIPTION H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT SAL/5-16 TO 5-31-88 u11 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE..INVC _ PROJ # ACCOUNT. DESCRIPTION 00243 001-202-0000-2030 00208 06/02/88 • HERMOSA BEACH .PAYROLL _ ACCOUNT_- _,___. 00243,_. SAL/6-1 TO 6-15-88 06/16/88 HERMOSA SAL/5-16 H _ ,_ HERMOSA SAL/5-16 H __ . HERMOSA SAL/5-16 L . H HERMOSA SAL/5-16 r' iv 1 In r HERMOSA SAL/5-16 HERMOSA SAL/5-16 H _ HERMOSA SAL/5-16 BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT .. TO 5-31-88 BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT,. TO 5-31-88 BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT__„_ TO 5-31-88 00243 06/02/88 00243 06/02/88 00243 06/02/88 BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT- 00243 TO 5-31-88 06/02/88 BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT TO 5-31-88 001720270000-2030_00209_ .105-202-0000-2030 110-202-0000-2030 115-202-0000-2030 145-202-0000-2030 INV/REF *151.379.28 /ACCRUED PAYROLL PAGE 0001 ' DATE 06/23/88 PO * CHK * AMOUNT._UNENC _._ DATE .EXP $222.152.85 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00119._ 47.369.38 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00119.!._._. $43.561.41 ____ --.__________..._..__. , /ACCRUED PAYROLL 40.00 49.521.08 ..___._ /ACCRUED PAYROLL 26597 40.00 06/22/88 26748-] 40.00 06/22/88 26597 40.00 06/22/88 ___00115._T.... 42.3007 13 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00243 155-202-0000-2030 00116_ 06/02/88 BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT____00243. TO 5-31-88 06/02/88 BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT TO 5-31-88 160-202-0000-203000113. 00243 705-202-0000-2030 06/02/88 43.972.96 /ACCRUED PAYROLL _ $6.446.62 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00077 .. $2,522.09 /ACCRUED PAYROLL ygNook TOTAL .11-11-11411117IH1****-11-1141-111171!**ill-11:41.41t3H11111-11.41-1H1-1H1-111-1H111:114141-11-11-31-11**********11-11-1_HF10.1 CHARLES H.*LEWIS TRNG/LEWIS-ECKERT 01418 001-400-2101-4316 06/16/88 POLICE 40.00 26597 _ 06/22/88 26597 .I' 06/22/88 26597 40.00 06/22/887, 26597 _.. $0.00 06/22/88 • J • 26597 40.00 06/22/887 26597 1 ' • 40.00 06/22/88 _A449.232,80_ *449..232.80________...._......._ --- 1 00236 .. $344,00 _ /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************************�t.**********,*_.__..__._$344.00 PARKER DIVING SERVICE REFUND CONSTRUCTION BOND 02306 001-210-0000-2110 02236 06/16/88 $27.329.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE • *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************************a*********** ** _...__. _..... .___....__.__._.----.__.._...... .. _ $27.329,00 H BRUCE*PHILLIPS JAIL TRNG COURSE 06344 26745 $0.00 06/22/88 _ . 06444 26747 40.00 06/22/88 00534 001-400-2101-4313 00156 4152.00 06/16/88 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE. STC 06345 26746 40.00 06/22/88 • • .110 Oa • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME _ _ . __DESCRIPTION_ _ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 PAGE 0002 DATE 06/23/88 I VND 4R ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK * ____DATE.INVC. PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC_- DATE EXP .. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ADV H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/MAY H _._.PUB _.PUB EMPLOYEES .. 1 41. RETIREMENT/MAY H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/MAY PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/MAY H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/MAY H_ PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/MAY • PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/MAY .H._. PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/MAY PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/MAY PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/MAY PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/MAY _ H PUB EMPLOYEES_ RETIREMENT/MAY PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/MAY RETIREMENT /MAY 88 RETIREMENT SYS. 88 RETIREMENT SYS._ 88 RETIREMENT SYS. 88 RETIREMENT_SYS-_. 88 RETIREMENT SYS...__ _.. 88 00026 _001-400-1213-4180 00220__ 06/13/88 RETIREMENT 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00221._ 06/22/88 RETIREMENT 00026 06/22/88 00026 06/22/88 00026 06/22/88 001-400-1213-4180 00222... RETIREMENT 001-400-1213-4180 00223 RETIREMENT ' 105-400-2601-4180 00074 . STREET LIGHTING 00026 . 110-400-3301-4180 00074. 06/22/88 VEH PKG DIST RETIREMENT..SYS.___._..._ 00026 88 06/22/88 RETIREMENT. SYS... 88 110-400-3302-4180 00074..._ PARKING ENF 00026 115-400-3101-4180 00047 06/22/88 MEDIANS RETIREMENT_SYS.___ 00026. __. 88 06/22/88 RETIREMENT. SYS. 88 RETIREMENT_ SYS._ 88 RETIREMENT SYS. _ 88 115-400-3104-4180 .. 00047__._ TRAFFIC SAFETY 00026 145-400-3401-4180 00047 06/22/88 DIAL A RIDE 00026 _145-400-3402-4180 ._.00047_ 06/22/88 ESEA 00026 145-400-3407-4180 00014 06/22/88 RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 88 06/22/88 RETIREMENT SYS._ 88 COMTR BUS STUDY 155-400-2102-4180 00047 CROSSING GUARD 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00074 06/22/88 SEWER/ST DRAIN $152.00 $77,729-32 _________ /RETIREMENT *77,570.48 _.._ _ /RETIREMENT . 26743 _- $0.00 $0.00 06/22/88 26750 f $0.00 06/22/88 26750 /RETIREMENT $0.00 06/22/88 $67. 99CR . _. /RETIREMENT $87466 /RETIREMENT $226.44__ /RETIREMENT 26750 $0.00 06/22/88 • 1:-) 26750....._ $0.00 06/22/88 26750 .1 $0.00 06/22/88 _$4,453.71___- -_ ___________26750 .__. 26750 ...... /RETIREMENT $912.47 $0.00 06/22/88 j /RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT $659...88 $125.28 /RETIREMENT $150.17______ /RETIREMENT $38.24.._ /RETIREMENT $92 01 /RETIREMENT $860.57. /RETIREMENT 26750 $0.00 06/22/89 26750 $0.00 06/22/88 _ 26750 . .I $0.00 06/22/88 26750 _. 1 $0.00 06/22/88 26750 _ $0.00 06/22/88 26750 $0.00 06/22/88-1 26750 $0.00 06/22/88 41 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 r- ,1 - °r Ni 4" PAY VENDOR NAME _____DESCRIPTION_.T,,!_ _ _ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 _..._. VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT PAGE 0003 DATE 06/23/88 ._ INV/REF PO * CHK N DATE__INVC__ _ PROJ * __ACCOUNT ,_-_____AMOUNT UNENC__.DATE_EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ***********r****************apt*****a******************************** H.__ SELF_INSURERS SERVICE, INC.__ REIMB LIAR/APR/MAY/JUNBB $85.895.92 00824 ._.705-400-1209-4324 _ _00052 _. $6,.094 93 06/14/88 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 05847. _ _ __ 26744 $0. 00 06/22/887 - *** VENDOR TOTAL._********************************************************************_. $6.094.93 _ — *** PAY CODE TOTAL.*************************************************************r* _.$562•.048-65 LT ANTHONY*ALTFELD . MEALS/ALTFELD/WRIGHT 00774 .. 001-400-2101-4312.00682.__... .. $43.50. _ _. 06/06/88 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** AMERICAN SOC OF CIVIL ENG. PUBLICTIONS/ANTICH 94554 a 02317 001-400-4202-4305 00297_._.. 03/31/88 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS MISC CHCS/JUN 88 00857 001-400-2101-4306 06/15/88 POLICE $43.30 06314 26754 *0.00 06/23/88 $18.81 ___.494554 OPER SUPPLIES $18,81 • 05727 .. 26755 $0.00 06/23/88 00534 _ $78.00 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL.****************************************************************** $78.00_,_ ANTHONY *ANTICH MON EXP/MAY 88 00030 _001-400-4202-4316 00103 05/31/88 PUB WKS ADMIN $28.64 _ ._... _ /TRAINING _ 00063 _26756 $0.00 06/23/88 06412 26757 *0.00 06/23/88 ', . *** _ VENDOR._TOTAL******************************************************************** $28,64.- ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/MAY 88 00152 001-400-2201-4309 00455 05/31/88 FIRE _001-400.-4204-4309 00962. BLDG MAINT ARATEX/RED STAR INDU_STRIAL_ ___ __00152 RAG RENTAL/MAY 88 �y- 05/31/88 ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/MAY 88 00152 001-400-4205-4309 00275 05/31/88 EQUIP SERVICE $20.50 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $86.50 .... . . /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $21.00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00017 26758 *0.00 06/23/88 _00017 _ _ 26758 $0.00 06/23/88 00017 26758 *0.00 06/23/88 i J FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 PAY *** VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL RAG RENTAL/MAY 88 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL __.. RAG RENTAL/MAY 88 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 PAGE 0004 DATE 06/23/88 ._.._ VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO $ CHK $ DATE INVC_ . PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION _ . _._.____. ___ AMOUNT...UNENC DATE EXP_. _______1 1 t. 00152 110-400-3302-4309 00419 $4.48 05/31/88 PARKING ENF 00152 115-400-3104-4309 00561 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00017 26758 $0.00 06/23/88 $15.00 _ __ _ __ _. 00017 05/31/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS VENDOR TOTAL ****************************************+*************** *******x ** ._ $147.48 26758 ., $0.00 06/23/88 R _ R. G. *ARNOLD _ . _. 01199 001-400-8606-4309 00010 _. $214.48 .. _ _39553_06343 FLOORING/POLICE REMODEL 39553 06/14/88 CIP 87-606 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 _ *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************. $214.48 . __ AUTOMOTIVE PAINT CENTER.._ 01891. _ ... _115-400-3104-4309 00560__..__ . $332_33. MISC CHCS/JUN 88 06/15/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS _*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************..__.._._.$332.33.. R_ AV-OX/PROFIRE MISC CHCS/JUN 88 00603 001-400-2201-4309 .. 00458_ _ *222.29_ .. _ .... . 06/15/88 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** .. $222.29 ____R_____ AVIATION LOCK & KEY____ 00407 001-400-2101-4305 00731____ ._ __$10.12 MISC CHCS/MAY 88 05/31/88 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHCS/MAY 88 00407 001-400-4204-4309 00959 . $133.07 05/31/88 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 26759 ._.._1 06/23/88 00653 .....__ 26760._ $0. 00 06/23/88 1 ______00065 - 26761. $0.00 06/23/88 4 _ __________00054 __ . 26762_ .. $0.00 06/23/88 I' _ *** VENDOR_.TOTAL********************************************************************_...___.._.$143+19_ R BANK OF AMERICA MAY EXP/K. NORTHCRAFT 00180 001-400-1101-4317 00248 $32.80 05/31/88 CITY COUNCIL /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR_ TOTAL************-****P***********111HH I****** ************************** ALFRED*BARNARD TRUCKING DUMP 17 LOADS DEBRIS C7523 $32-80_ 00054 26762 $0.00 06/23/88 04094 26763 $0.00 06/23/88 01356 .001-400-3103-4201 00168._. $3,995.00 1C7509/1C7523 06404 06/06/88 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 26764 06/23/88 v FINANCE-SFA340 TIME _17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT PAGE 0005 DATE 06/23/88 _ INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION____._________ DATE..INVC__,._,PROJ #.... ..__.ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNLUNENC___DATE_EXP. v *** VENDOR TOTAL *************a • *********aa**********# ******* ****** ******** R� ___BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA_ -__.__01308 ,. _• CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 ;__ __ __ _. R_.•____ BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 M _001-400-1212-4188 0106,— EMP 1064__EMP BENEFITS . 01308 _ 06/15/88 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA________,_01308 _._. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA._ CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 SLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA _ CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA__, CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 105-400-2601-4188 00526 STREET LIGHTING _.1.10-400-3301-4188 00520_ VEH PKG DIST 01308 _110-400-3302-4188 00696_. 06/15/88 PARKING ENF' 01308 _1157400-3101-4188 __.00429„• 06/15/88 MEDIANS $3,995.00 41 r Jv 6 v __ 486 31 00055 _ /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 40.00 40.51 ___:00055 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 40.00 _ _-...... _42.56 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 44.10 _ /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS _ _40.51 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01308 115-400-3104-4188 00465.._ 06/15/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA,_______.____01308 _. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY B8 06/15/88 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA __ CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 R BLUE SHIELD.. OF CALIFORNIA "�- - CITYTHEALTH INS/JULY 88 v'I _.*** VENDOR TOTAL ***************** 2 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 • ,I r R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 145-400-3401-4188 00467_ DIAL A RIDE __ 01308 145-400-3402-4188 00465 06/15/88 ESEA 01308 -,_145-400-3407-4188 00209 06/15/88 COMTR BUS STUDY 40.51 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 40.52..._ /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 40.39 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 26765 06/22/88 26765 06/22/88 00055._____ 26765 40.00 06/22/88— 7• w 00055 26765 Jr. 40.00 06/22/88 • w 00055 .____26765 40.00 06/22/887 00055 26765 J " 40.00 06/22/88 40 00055____ 26765 40.00 06/22/88----1; 00055 26765 40.00 06/22/88 40.37 . _ .... . 26765 _ /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 40.00 06/22/80 *************************************************** .. R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 ___' BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 01293 __001-400-1212-4188 01071..__ 06/15/88 EMP BENEFITS 01293 105-400-2601-4188 00528 06/15/88 STREET LIGHTING 01293 110-400-3302-4188 00698., 06/15/88 PARKING ENF 46, 846. 43 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 429.37 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4164.67 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01293 • 115-400-3101-4188 00431 4127.12 06/15/88 MEDIANS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00056 26766 40.00 06/22/88 00056 26766 40.00 06/22/88 00056 ___ 26766 __� 40.00 06/22/88 00056 26766 40.00 06/22/88 Qi 40 v LL. • FINANCE–SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME ..._DESCRIPTION _____ _____•__ _.._– ._.. _ R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 __.R____BLUE BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED ______ CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 R ___ _ BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 __R___. SLUE.. SHIELD PREFERRED _.__ CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 98 R._ BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED . . CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT PAGE 0006 I DATE 06/23/88 __-, INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE _INVC._.._ PROJ # .._..A000UNT_ DESCRIPTION _ _ AMOUNT_UNENC___DATE. EXP._ 00056 26766 $0.00 06/22/88 01293 115-400-3104-4188 00467 06/15/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY _._.__.01293. ..145-400-3401-4188 00469._ 06/15/88 DIAL A RIDE _._01293 . 145-400-3402-4188 00467_. 06/15/88 ESEA $156.49 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $14. 86. /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $11.14 .. _ /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .01293 _145-400-3407-4188 145-400-3407-4188 00211 __.__ .__ .. . _ $11.14 06/15/88 COMTR BUS STUDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00056____26766 $0.00 06/22/881I –00056 - . 26766 $0.00 06/22/88 0 0 411. • J 00056 . _ ._ 26766... $0.00 06/22/88 26766 _ _ J ,. 06/22/88 _ 01293 160-400-3102-4188 00469 ._ $29.37_ _____________.00056 06/15/88 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 _***_VENDOR TOTAL_*************aaar1n ********************* *a***********************______$7...390._59 R BOA ARCHITECTURE NEEDS ASSESSMENT SERV 10594 01744 001-400-4202-4201 00190_.. $750.00 _..10594..06440 05/31/88 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR_TOTAL.._n***A*************************************************************.._ $750.00_ . GAIL*BROWN MEALS/BROWN/FOX 01004 001-400-2101-4312 00681 06/07/88 POLICE $29.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST *** VENDOR_TOTAL_****+f**************************************************************._.__.__ __.$29 00 BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES TRASH PICKUP/JUN 88 BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES___ TRASH PICKUP/JUN 88 . 00155 001-400-1208-4201 00449 06/01/88 GEN APPROP 00155 06/01/88 110-400-3301-4201 00165_ VEH PKG DIST _ 06334 $0.00 $573.11 _ /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 26767 7] " 06/23/88 26768 06/23/88 00005 26769 J' $0.00 06/23/88 $447.20 00005. _ _ 26769 __.___i /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/23/88 $1.020.31 ._• ***VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** BSI CONSULTANTS. INC,,__._____00630 __T001-400-4201-4201 _00100.____. __ _$760.24 ___. —56040._.04956 .___ 26770 PLAN CHECK SERVICES 56040 05/27/88 BUILDING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/23/88-1 *** VENDOR..TOTAL******************************************************************** R.__ W. ROBERT*BUCHINSKY ' THEATRE TECH SERV/MAY88 _$760.24 _02116.. __001-400-4601-4201 00205______ _ . $590.00 04875____ 26771 05/31/88 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/23/887 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 17:16:13 _ PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE_ INVC,__-_ PROJ .p ...., ACCOUNT. DESCRIP_T,ION TAMOUNT_UNENC_ DATE .EXP. •'I r• PAGE 0007 DATE 06/23/88.___ INV/REF PO # CHK * *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************************r**aa****** $590.00 R_____•_ BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY_._. _ __00034...._.._ 001-400-8606-5400 00007__. __ $2..506 76 05683._.._—_.26772 PROPERTY ROOM SHELVES 05/31/88 CIP 86-606 /EQUIPMENT $2.573.88 06/23/88 I *** VENDOR.TOTAL********************************************************************.._.__ *2,506.76 C. E. P. O_ -__� _ __ ----- __.___02318 ... .._ .001-400-1121-4316 00012_ _ .. ... $7.5_ 00 REG/K. MIDSTOKKE TR205 06/20/88 CITY CLERK , /TRAINING !._.. _*** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************************a********. - -. _. _._$75..00 SR205 _00205 . ___ .. 26773 .. $0.00 06/23/88 R_._ CA BEACH VOLLEYBALL ASSOC _ 01882 MEMBERSHIPS COLLECTED 56929-----'06/07/88 R CA BEACH VOLLEYBALL ASSOC MEMBERSHIPS COLLECTED 001-300-0000-3411 ._. 00676._ _.. __$195. 00...__ . _ .56929.__04871 . _.26774 /OTHER FACILITIES 01882 001-400-4601-4315 00037 _ $75.00... 06/21/88 COMM RESOURCES /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************************************it $27Q._0_0 CALIF NARCOTICS OFCRS ASSOC. TUITION/S. ENDOM 01797 001-400-2101-4316 06/13/88 POLICE 00240 $40.00 /TRAINING VENDOR_TOTAL******************************************************************** R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY • CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88-- R 8_R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY R_ CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY-8e 00239 001-400-1212-4188 01065 88 06/15/88 EMP BENEFITS _...__._ 00239 105-400-2601-4188 00522 06/15/88 STREET LIGHTING 00239 110-400-3301-4188 00517 88 06/15/88 VEH PKG DIST CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 ' v' 00239 __110-400-3302-4188 00692__, 06/15/88 PARKING ENF 00239 115-400-3101-4188 00425 06/15/88 MEDIANS - - *40._00_ $1.944.78 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 06/23/88 04887 26774 $0.00 06/23/88 06347 *0.00 26775 06/23/88 00024 26776 $0.00 06/22/88 J $67.68____-----__ 00024 _ 26776 ___. _� /EMPLOYEE BENEFIT*0.00 06/22/88 $57.84• 00024 26776 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 06/22/88 $376.75 _ _ /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $47.04 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS J _________-00024 26776 ._ _.__ __� *0.00 06/22/88 I •. ," 00024 . 26776 . $0.00 06/22/88 J " I ae 3,406 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME _.. __DESCRIPTION _ CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 _ _R_.___ CANADA LIFE _ CITY HEALTH INS/JULY ' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT __.._. DATE_INVC.____._.PROJ # _.. ACCOUNT_DESCRIPTION._._ 00239 115-400-3104-4188 00461 06/15/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00239 145-400-3401-4188 00463._ 06/15/88 DIAL A RIDE 00239 145-400-3402-4188 00461 _ 06/15/88 ESEA 00239. ._.145-400-3407-4188 00205... 88 06/15/88 COMTR BUS STUDY CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 R___ _. CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 00239 155-400-2102-4188 00190. 06/15/88 CROSSING GUARD 00239 -.160-400-3102-4188 00465. 06/15/88 SEWER/ST DRAIN $74.09 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PAGE 0008 DATE 06/23/88 _ ._.. ' INV/REF PO # CHK * AMOUNLUNENC.-___DATE . EXP 00024 . 26776 .-- -.-t $0.00 06/22/88 $9.57_...._.___,____._,....00024 26776 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $4.34 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $7.22 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .. $67.21 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS VENDOR _ TOTAL **************************************** *************************** _... _._ . *2.665_74. __R._ _CENTER FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE _._. _..... 02000 001-400-2101-4312 TUIT/ALTFELD/WRIGHT 06/07/88 POLICE $0.00 06/22/88 00024 - 26776 $0.00 06/22/88 _ 00024 .. 26776_ $0.00 06/22/88 I. 00024 26776 $0.00 06/22/88 00024 _. 26776 $0.00 06/22/88 00686_ $248.00 __ --- ______ 06313 /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $248.00 R__-_ _ CHAMPION CHEVROLET_____, __ 00014 _001-400-2101-4311 MISC CHCS/JUN 88 06/15/88 POLICE 26777. 06/23/88 1 I .• -1 ..00505.___. . _ $126.78 , _ __ 00069 ...__ 26778 __ /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 06/23/88 $126.78 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R _ CHURCH OF CHRIST OF LATTER 02314 .001-210-0000-2110. 02239 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 56916 06/06/88 $101.50. _56916 .56916 05935 . 26779 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $101.50 _ R _. .. COAST IRRIGATION CO._ _ -.._ _00354 ___125-400-8508-4309 00004._ . $1.947..76 _ �� PARK SPRINKLER SUPPLIES 05/25/88 CIP 85-508 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS Ni___.*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.947.76. _R�_ OFCR NANCY*COOK 02173 001-400-2101-4312 _ 00687___.-_ . . -..$36.25 MEALS/LASER COURSE 06/07/88 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST i 05498 ___26780 _ _ $0.00 06/23/88 1 I. J 06333 .__ 26781 $0.00 06/23/Sir---11. ;tel ti. 6-1 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 .. V. 1 V , R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 00267 115-400-3104-4251 00057 $538.53 105150 06439 26785 HIGHWAY MAINT/APR 88 05150 05/25/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 06/23/88 PAY VENDOR NAME „,DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 PAGE 0009 DATE 06/23/88.. VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # PROJ # ._._A000UNT.DESCRIPTION AMOUN_T_UNENC.DATE_ EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL***a**************************************************************** .. _. $36.25 DATA SAFE _ _ _ _ _ _ 00156 __ 001-400-1206-4201 00395__._._ _ $80..75..._... _..____._. _37240_00047 ___ 26782. TAPE STORAGE/MAY12—JUNI1 37240 06/14/88 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/23/88 --1 .. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $80..75._._._..— DEPARTMENT OF ANIMALCARE &_,_ 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00076 . $419.85 00014 26783 SHELTER COSTS/MAY 88 06/10/88 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************...___._._..-.$419.85 - - - DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES_,_._, __ _ 01862 _0017400-2101-4251_ 001-400-2101-4251 .. .00208 $328.26 ....-_. ___._M30161__ 06330 ...._. 26784. . __ PROCUREMENT FEE/PD VEH 30161 05/16/88 POLICE . /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************.._._. ._$328.26 _ _.._. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 00267 105-400-2601-4251. 00059 $538.52_ ..105150___06439 26785 HIGHWAY MAINT/APR 88 05150 05/25/88 STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 06/23/887 ' *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** w __ *1,077.05•_.___._ M. O. *DION & _ SONS. _ INC. 00085 _001-400-1208-4310 00127 $4,636.93 57271/57314 06427 26786 FUEL/CITY YARD 57314 05/27/88 GEN APPROP /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************************$******---_-.. *4,_636.93.__._ 10 4 EASY READER EMP ADVERTISING Ir b 00181 001-400-1203-4201 00327 $34.50 1328 06/09/88 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************apt**************************** $3450 EL CAMINO COLLEGE DOM VIOL CLASS/4 OFCRS 01469 001-400-2101-4312 00685 06/07/88 POLICE 1328. 05843 26787 $0.00 06/23/88 $10.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST f"~5 y i:, �; r -r: .�.r. P tIp nrSc �r,;ta4e It3.4i •?4' k 00 .'04 06336 26788 $0.00 06/23/88 40 - r r FINANCE—SFA340 ..__.. TIME 17:16:13_. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT __ ACCOUNT_ DESCR.IP_TION *** VENDOR TOTAL ************** ***********•*****a**aaera**************************** __ R ._ STEVE*ENDOM _ . MEALS/OFCR SFTY CLASS _ *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** ._.—_.__414.50 ____________ . 0 PAGE 0010 �1.'0 - DATE 06/23/88__ INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT_UNENC. _.,DATE_EXP _ *10.00 _ .. _ .. 01034 _001-400-2101-4316 .....00239 _____ _.. _. *14-50 06/13/88 POLICE /TRAINING _.R_ ERT 'I RAILROAD SITE SURVEY 06346. -__ _.. 26789 40.00 06/23/88-1 ___ .._... 02312 _ __001-400-11Q1-4201 . 00024_.___.... 43,000.00_ .____.._.____48420_04886 _____26790_ 48420 04/26/88 CITY COUNCIL . /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 06/23/88 I1 — .*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************. JOHN*FEATHERSTONE _ . _ _ VOLLEYBALL DIR SERV JOHN*FEATHERSTONE VOLLEYBALL DIR SERV 00994 001-400-4601-4201 00203 06/01/88 COMM RESOURCES 00994 001-400-4601-4201 00204 06/14/88 COMM RESOURCES $3.000.00 4400.00 04870 _ 26791. /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 06/23/88 $400.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ***._VENDOR TOTAL._**************4*******4********************************************* ,._*800-00 RON*FOX MILES/FOX/KOEBSELL 01007 001-400-2101-4313 06/13/88 POLICE 00158 _ 478.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC ***_VENDOR.TOTAL****************************************************+r************n**___._ R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY LIGHTING FIXTURES __R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY LIGHTING FIXTURES GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY _ LIGHTING FIXTURES 00058 001-400-4204-4309 00965 06/08/88 BLDG MAINT 00058 __001-400-4204-4321 00360_ 06/08/88 BLDG MAINT 04873 26791 $0:00 06/23/88 06348 26792 40.00 06/23/88 $78,00_______________ $800.84 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4534.08 /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT 00058 105-400-2601-4309 00356 4938.05 06/08/88 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS _*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************..__...__ *2,272 97 BRIAN*GENGLER REIMB TUITION r 02316 :001-400-4202-4316 00102_. 4295.00 05/26/88 PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING FiF ti.rm.r11 05764 26793 40.00 06/23/88 ______05764 _..._ 26793. _ *0.00 06/23/88 1 • 05764 26793 *0.00 06/23/88 .... 06409 _ 26794 _ .I 40.00 06/23/88 .o✓ FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION .__ _____ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 MND 8 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT .. DATE_. INVC.,.___ PROJ # _ . ACCOUNT._DESCRI.PTION *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************a****************************ria******* GEORGE WASHINGTON LIFE INS.___ _ ..__ ___00574 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 R GEORGE WASHINGTON LIFE INS. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 ' V b V Lr GEORGE WASHINGTON LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 _ 001-400-1212-4188 01066._ EMP BENEFITS 00574 105-400-2601-4188 00523 06/15/88 INS... 00574 06/15/88 GEORGE WASHINGTON LIFE INS. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 GEORGE WASHINGTON LIFE INS.__ CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 GEORGE WASHINGTON LIFE INS. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 R ..__•_ _ GEORGE WASHINGTON LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 R GEORGE WASHINGTON LIFE INS. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 GEORGE WASHINGTON LIFE INS. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 STREET LIGHTING _ 110-400-3302-4188 00693._. PARKING ENF 00574 115-400-3101-4188 00426. 06/15/88 MEDIANS ' .00574 06/15/88 115-400-3104-4188 00462 _ TRAFFIC SAFETY 00574 145-400-3401-4188 00464 06/15/88 DIAL A RIDE 00574 _.145-400-3402-4188 00462_ 06/15/88 ESEA 00574 06/15/88 00574 06/15/88 145-400-3407-4188 00206 COMTR BUS STUDY 160-400-3102-4188 00466__ SEWER/ST DRAIN PAGE 0011 DATE 06/23/88 ._.. INV/REF PO $ CHK N $295.00 _$1.617.25 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AMOUNT_ UNENC_ __DATE. EXP $6.02 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $44.40 ...._. /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $23.92 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $28.22 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $3.16 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00001 . __ ... 26795_ $0.00 06/22/88 _. 00001 26795 $0.00 06/22/88 $1. 85 _.. _ /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2.37 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $6.02 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** .. $1.733.21 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES 'r DUAL PRINTER STAND 37031 ( 00001 _... 26795 $0.00 06/22/88 7 _00001 00001 26795 $0.00 06/22/88 v V v v ____00001 26795 $0.00 06/22/88 v 00001 26795 $0.00 06/22/88 _...___.._.00001 __ __ 26795 $0.00 06/22/88 1, 00001 26795 $0.00 06/22/88 00001 _ 26795 _____ $0.00 06/22/88 I 00275 ...001-400-4201-5400 00029 . $216,85.__________18037031. 01733 05/24/88 BUILDING /EQUIPMENT $207.68 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** GTEL .________________01340 ___001-400-2201-4304 EQUIP RENT/JUNE 88 06/16/88 FIRE GTEL EQUIP RENT/MAY-JUN 88 $216.85 001.12 _._.... $108,.20 /TELEPHONE _ 01340 001-400-4601-4304 00197 .. $181.32._... 06/16/88 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE V v 26796 06/23/88 1.. 0$ 06246.___ ... 26797 $0.00 06/23/88 � W 06246 _ 26797 (" $0.00 06/23/88 343 r FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME _ DESCRIPTION _ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0012 FOR 06/28/88 DATE 06/23/88. VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE. INVC.. __ _ PROJ # ACCOUNT.. DESCRIPTION ________.AMOUNT_UNENC__—.DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL#####****a####*******a#***#********************rw*****##**####### r** $289.52 0 3 GUILD PRINTING COMPANY. INC. .. 00202 001-400-1101-4305 00179_. $1.431.36.. _ . _119656:-01_ 04877 ._ 26798 , PRELIM BUDGET PRINTING 56-01 05/30/88 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 06/23/88 1 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 41.431.36 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO._..._._. 00731 . 001-400-3103-4311 00359_.._.. _ $4,224.77 ._1C7509/1C7523_.06408 26799 GEAR BOX/ST SWEEPER C7523 06/06/88 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 40.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************###********* $4.224.77.__ R..__. HANNON, PARK. & LENNON ._... .___._.. 01079 _ ...._.705-400-1209-4324 00053._,. .. _... $345_00...._.. __,___6465_05850 _._26800..__ LEGAL SERV/MAY 88 6465 06/14/88 LIABILITY INS, /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS $0.00 06/23/88 _*** VENDOR. TOTAL********************************************************************...._. HARTLEY & NIXON RENTALS_. .. . __ 00653 ___.001-400-3103-4311 00361_._.........__.. $18.76 _ __._.47.103_._.05737 __ 26801 __ WEED WHACKER GASKETS 47103 04/20/88 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 06/23/88 $18.76 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** CLAUDIA*HASSANNALLY _00542 .001-300-0000-3904 00197__. _$6.30 ___16762__ 06241 _.. 26802. ._ REPLACE LOST WARRANT 16762 06/16/88 /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS $0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************######################################## .. $6.30 • ______R ____ .HAWTHONE POLICE DEPARTMENT _ .______._ ,00172 001-400-2101-4316, 00238_.... $169..29_. _ ____._HB16_ 06324 ,_ 26803 ..__ TRNG EXP/3 EMPLOYEES H816 06/06/88 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 06/23/88 • i J *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** _ $169.29. R__HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY__. _. _ _00149_...._.,_, 001=400-1206-4316 00058 _ $900_.00 TRAINING EXP/B. SHEEHAN X2895 06/15/88 DATA PROCESSING /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************_._ $900.00 R HIWAY MARKING_SYSTEMS,:, I STREET SIGNS 4650 _7CX2895_05273. __ 26804. $0.00 06/23/88-1 00280. __001.400-3103-4309 00654,..__ _ _.... $144.,84 .__ _....________4650 . 05770 _. .26805 06/07/88 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $144. 84 06/23/88 v FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 r r r r r r • r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 PAGE 0013 DATE 06/23/88 PAY VENDOR NAME VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * ._.DESCRIPTION _ DATE .INVC___ PROJ * ,._. ACCOUNT DESCRIP—T.ION._. ____—_— _AMOUN.LUNENC__.DATE_EXP__ R HIWAY MARKING SYSTEMS STREET SIGNS 00280 115-400-3104-4309 00562 4144.84 4650 05770 26805 4650 06/07/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $144.84 06/23/88 _*** VENDOR_ TOTAL * ***************************** r*******************************aa*** $28968 KANE BALLMER & BERKMAN 00130 .001-400-1131-4201 00385 LEGAL SERV/MAY 88 I6.9 06/10/88 CITY ATTORNEY $1,494.50 _16.9_04095 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00 *** VENDOR. TOTAL**********ar********************************************************* 411_494-50 J J • 26806 - ✓ 06/23/88 R KELLY PAPER COMPANY 00212 001-400-1208-4305 00516 $1.062.87 COPIER PAPER 9895 06/17/88 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL_***********************.x.****alio-*****p..p.,...r************,a•*************** _ ..$1062 87 R MICHAEL*LADD 01978 001-400-1206-4201 00396 4588.75 8 SOFTWARE SUPP/MAY 88 8 05/31/88 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT .*** VENDOR TOTAL**************ao-************4*********aw***************$aha **_—_,_4588.75 .9895 06242 26807 I" ✓ $0.00 06/23/88 R JEREMY*LOEB TECH SERV/MAY & JUN 88 06128 26808 $0.00 06/23/88 02078 001-400-4601-4201 00202 3180.00 06/14/88 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR_TOTAL.******************a►***•z•M•***************************r**************** .. R - JAMES P. *LOUGH 00938 05/31/88 001-400-1131-4201 00384 45,224.00 LEGAL RETAINER/MAY88 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL********************.N•***************•M•*************************.n•*.m***_ __ _..*5, 224.00 MAIN ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. MISC CHGS/MAY 88 MAIN ELECTRIC SUPPLY_C0.__ _ MISC CHCS/MAY 88 00426 001-400-8606-4309 00009 05/31/88 CIP 87-606 00426 _. 05/31/88 _105-400-2601-4309 00354. STREET LIGHTING 04874 26809 $0.00 06/23/88 _ 04097 26810 $0.00 06/23/88 $51.81 •00527 26811 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4129.05 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS __--***.VENDOR TOTAL*ao-****************************************************************** R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 $180.86 01859 001-400-1212-4188 01070__ ,_ $618.06 $0.00 06/23/88 4.0 I y Y 00527 26811 40.00 06/23/88 I, M 1 .< .. 00041 .26812 06/15/88 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 06/22/88 j3°480!' 40 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC 01859 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01859 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01859 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01859 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01859 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 _R .. MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK01859 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01859 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 R___ MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK ._.._ . ___ _ _. 01859 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01859 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK .._ _ . 01859 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 105-400-2601-4188 00527 STREET LIGHTING 110-400-3301-4188 00521 VEH PKG DIST 110-400-3302-4188 00697 PARKING ENF 115-400-3101-4188 00430 MEDIANS 115-400-3104-4188 00466 TRAFFIC SAFETY 145-400-3401-4188 00468. DIAL A RIDE 145-400-3402-4188 00466 ESEA 145-400-3407-4188 00210 _ COMTR 8U8 STUDY 155-400-2102-4188 00192 CROSSING GUARD 160-400-3102-4188 00468 SEWER/ST DRAIN 612.91 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 62.32 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6106.88 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PAGE 3 0014 J DATE 06/23/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT. UNENC._.. _.DATE EXP 617.87 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 617.88 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00041 26812 50.00 06/22/88 00041 26812 50.00 06/22/88 00041 26812 50.00 06/22/88 00041 26812 $0.00 06/22/88 00041 26812 50.00 06/22/88 52.97 __._.00041 _ . 26812 . /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 60.00 06/22/88 63.84 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS . 00041 26812 50.00 06/22/88 50.87. _. _. 00041 .__ /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 50.00 61.20 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS _ 59.60 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL w***************#***#*#a*******************a************a as***** 6794.40 R _.. �_.. MANHATTAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. _ _ ___.__ _ 00236 _ CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 MANHATTAN LIFE INSURANCE CO._ CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 001-400-1212-4188 01064__ EMP BENEFITS 00236 105-400-2601-4188 00521 06/15/88 'MANHATTAN LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 R MANHATTAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. 00236 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 STREET LIGHTING 110-400-3301-4188 00516._ VEH PKG DIST 110-400-3302-4188 00691 PARKING ENF 6396.29 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 511.31 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 51.97 ._ /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 677.71 /EMPLOYEE BENEFIT8 1 26812 ._ 06/22/88 T 00041 26812 50.00 06/22/88 __.. 26812 50.00 06/22/88 26813 60.00 06/22/88 00028 26813 50.00 06/22/88 gre _00028 26813 $0.00 06/22/88-1 00028 26813 50.00 06/22/88 J , FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME _ _•__DESCRIPTION v • f S7 MANHATTAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 VNO M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT - DATE INVC_ ...PROJ.* .ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00236 115-400-3101-4188 00424 06/15/88 MEDIANS MANHATTAN LIFE INSURANCE. CO.____ ____00236 _.. •__ CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 MANHATTAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 115-400-3104-4188 .. 00460._ TRAFFIC SAFETY 00236 145-400-3401-4188 00462. 06/15/88 DIAL A RIDE __•_ R . MANHATTAN LIFE INSURANCE.. C0._!__....._ 00236 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 MANHATTAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 145-400-3402-4188 00460__ ESEA 00236 145-400-3407-4188 00204 06/15/88 R - MANHATTAN LIFE INSURANCE_C0..._ _00236 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 MANHATTAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 COMTR BUS STUDY 155-400-2102-4188 00189 CROSSING GUARD 00236 160-400-3102-4188 00464 06/15/88 SEWER/ST DRAIN PAGE 00155 DATE 06/23/88 _• INV/REF PO N CHK * AMOUNT.__UNENC DATE EXP. $10.82 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00028 26813 $0.00 06/22/88 $15.74 00028 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 $1.83 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2.31 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.35 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.98 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $10.82 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL **************** ****** .**.*****************************ter******* R MC GARRY CENTRAL TYPEWRITER IBM TYPEWRITERS 8305 00390 001-400-2101-5400 06/14/88 POLICE *530. 13 00165 _ $1,977.70, /EQUIPMENT 26813 06/22/88 00028 26813 __I $0.00 06/22/88 00028 .... 26813 $0.00 06/22/88 00028 26813 $0.00 06/22/88 00028 ___ 26813 __, $0.00 06/22/88 _00028 26813 $0.00 06/22/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************x•********************** $1.977,70. --- MMASC MEMBERSHIPS DUES/R. BLACKWOOD 00537 001-400-1203-4315 00022 $30.00 06/06/88 PERSONNEL /MEMBERSHIP ***_VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** MONAHAN'S CUSTOM CANVAS. REPAIR DEBRIS TARPS 3188 __%30,00 02151 001-400-2201-4309 00461. $111.83 • 05/20/88 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *1U. 83 .R _ _ MONARCH BROOM MISC CHCS/JUN 88 • __00084 001-400-3103-4309 00652 $134.19 06/15/88 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 8305 06326 26814 $0.00 06/23/88 12 05846 26815 $0.00 06/23/88 3188. 05327 26816 $111.83 06/23/88 1 v 6; i ~ 00630 26817 $0.00 06/23/88 w 3 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME ._ DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 PAGE 0016 DATE 06/23/88 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO IS CHK DATE INVC _. PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION _ AMOUNT..UNENC___.DATE EXP_ _ *** VENDOR TOTAL****••******•**************•x******************************************* R _. MOTOROLA INC. RADIO REPAIR/FIRE *134.19 J 00083 001-400-2201-4309 00460 .. .4135.00. _.W0678049 05330... 26818 -.._ 78049 05/28/88 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 40.00 06/23/88 �• J *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R .._. MOTOROLA INC.. $135.00 00207 .._001-400-2701-5400 00003_ $17.715-22__________170672. 03200 ..... 26819 . ____ PORTABLE RADIOS/POLICE 70672 05/28/88 CIVIL DEFENSE /EQUIPMENT $17.715.21 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $17,715.22 R NABER TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES __ ..... _ 00656 _001-400-2101-4313 00157.... X561. 36 _.___.... ______________06331_.. 26820 . _._.� REG/JOHNSON/KOEBSELL 05/31/88 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC 40.00 06/23/88 __*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *561.36 PATTY JAY*NEAL __ - 01722 001-210-0000-2110 02240____. __ 4296.50.__.. .. _._ 56921__ 05939 _ .26821. 26821. _ DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 56921 06/20/88 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 40.00 06/23/88 i• .- 00 .*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4296.50 R __ _ RONALD*NISBET ASSOCIATES - 01557 - -. 105-400-8203-4201 00022._ . .. 41.330.00 .___.5476._ 05476 .__ 26822 PROF SERV/PIER GROUNDING 5476 06/06/88 CIP 85-203 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.330.00 __. KEVIN B.*NORTHCRAFT - 02064 _ 001-400-1201-4317 00138._ _ 442.50 04093 ____ 26823 _ MON EXP/MAY 15 -JUN 15 06/16/88 CITY MANAGER /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 06/23/88 .*** VENDOR TOTAL*************•******************************************************* *42.50 R OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER._._ _, _ __ ,_00093 _ _ _.._001-400-2101-4311. _00506____... .. _ $259.89 .... AUTO REPAIR/POLICE UNIT 10870 06/13/88 POLICE !AUTO MAINTENANCE -.*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $259.89 _.10870_..06342 ___ _ . 26824-- $0.00 06/23/88 1 ORAL HEALTH SERVICES .__ 00235 _...001-400-1212-4188 01068__.. . $982.92��^ ._ __00019 26825 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 06/22/88 J • J 1 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME �.. DESCRIPTION V � R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 ORAL HEALTH SERVICES _._ ___ _ __• _ CITY HEALTH'INS/JULY 88 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 R .1 R R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 _ ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 __R _._ ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 ORAL_ HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRI.PTION 00235 105-400-2601-4188 00525 06/15/88 STREET LIGHTING __00235 .._110-400-3301-4188 00519-, 06/15/88 VEH PKG DIST 00235 110-400-3302-4188 00695 06/15/88 PARKING ENF 00235 115-400-3101-4188 00428 06/15/88 MEDIANS 00235 115-400-3104-4188 00464 06/15/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY PAGE 0017 DATE 06/23/88 INV/REF PO * CHK N AMOUNT ._UNENC _._ DATE EXP___ $33.80 .. 00019 26825 __ /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 06/22/88 86.96. /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $242.83 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS _00019 ._.. 26825 $0.00 06/22/88 -1 _ 00019 26825 __1 $0.00 06/22/88 $29.69 ._.__ _,___ -._00019 . __. 26825 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ~ $0.00 06/22/88 --- $47.9200019 $47.9200019 26825 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 06/22/88 __ __ 00235 _145-400-3401-4188 00466 $0.78 06/15/88 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00235 145-400-3402-4188 00464 $5.11 06/15/88 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00019 _ ._ 26825 .. � $0.00 06/22/88 i 00019 26825 $0.00 06/22/88 ___________00235 _145-400-3407-4188 00208. __. $0.52 00019 ._._ 26825 06/15/88 COMTR BUS STUDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00235 155-400-2102-4188 00191 $4.74 06/15/88 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS _ __ . _ _ __ _. __ 00235 _160-400-3102-4188 00467 $38.68 06/15/88 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************air************************************** R _ _ PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE__ ____00321 PD COMP HOOKUP/JUNE 88 �T 06/01/88 $1.393.95 $0.00 06/22/88 00019 26825 $0.00 06/22/88 00019 26825 . $0.00 06/22/88 I:. 001-400-2101-4304 _00257 00257 $138.27 _ _ .00036 _ 26826 . POLICE /TELEPHONE ^� $0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PACIFICARE_-••_-- •.00575 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 %.,71 R PACIFICARE 00575 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 _001-400-1212-4188 01063 __ EMP BENEFITS 105-400-2601-4188 00520 STREET LIGHTING 8138..27. sof J J 4 1# I• $10.736.58 00016 __ 26827. /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 06/22/88 -1. 00016 .. 26827 _.1' $0.00 06/22/88 $275.35 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8, • r� - .I L_ FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R PACIFICARE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0018 FOR 06/28/88 DATE 06/23/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO it CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION .__ ... __ __. _... ._._ . AMOUNT UNENC ... DATE EXP __ 00575 110-400-3301-4188 00515 $64.17 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00016 26827 $0.00 06/22/88 _ R__. , PACIFICARE _ _. 00575 .110-400-3302-4188 00690_. $2,130.64. ______.. __ _____00016 -- 26827 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 06/22/88 PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 00575 115-400-3101-4188 00423 $275.35 _.. 00016 . 26827 06/15/88 MEDIANS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 06/22/88 PACIFICARE 00575 _. 115-400-3104-4188 00459 . _ $485.52 ____.___._..00016 .. _. 26827 _- CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 06/22/88 R PACIFICARE 00575 145-400-3401-4188 00461. $34.55 _ _ 00016 26827 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 DIAL A RIDE' /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 06/22/88 PACIFICARE .._ .. 00575 _145-400-3402-4188 00459 $43.89 00016 26827 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 06/22/88 R PACIFICARE 00575 145-400-3407-4188 00203 $6.53 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 COMTR BUS STUDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS _ R._._. PACIFICARE 00575 155-400-2102-4188 00188 $36.55 . ' CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R PACIFICARE 00575 160-400-3102-4188 00463 $303.76 CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 06/15/88 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS _.*fir* VENDOR TOTAL ******** ******************* * *** *********** * * ******,*._._. 00016 26827 $0.00 06/22/88 40. or ar 00016 .. 26827 _._ $0. 00 06/22/88 00016 26827 $0.00 06/22/88 R PAK WEST 00519 001-400-4204-4309 00960 . $252.66 00632 26828 MISC CHCS/MAY 88 05/31/88 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 06/23/88 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 00519 001-400-4204-4309 00964.._. $1,766.42 _... ___ 05772 . 26828 06/07/88 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $1.759.12 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL •stat*********•**************************r****************************** $24019.08 •J J 9• R PARKER DIVING SERVICE..__ __._.02306 .._._.105-400-8203-4201. 00021.__ $24,596.00 . . _.8832.__06447 .__. 26829 DIVING/PIER REPAIRS 8832 06/16/88 CIP 85-203 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/23/88 ~ 1• -- -*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $24.596.00 PARKER PUBLISHING_CO,,_..INC._02311 02311 110-400-3302-4316 00111__._ ... $27.49__ ____ _______ .06129 ___ 26830 _ I PUBLICATIONS 06/06/88 PARKING ENF /TRAINING $0.00 06/23/88 1.� - v v v" FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME _._._ _ „_DESCRIPTION _ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC . PROJ * .ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION__ *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************pat*****#************#********* * PAGE 0019 . DATE 06/23/88 INV/REF PO M CHK 4* __ ..___.___._ AMOUNT_UNENC _... DATE EXP ._ _—_ $27.49 ___R __._. PEP BOYS _ ____,_._.___ .__._00608 _.... _,..001-400-2201-4311.._..00220_.___ __ .___.$34.03 MISC CHCS/JUN 88 06/15/88 FIRE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************_._.... _. $34..03 00634._ 26831_ $0.00 06/23/88 R _PEPSI COLA BOTTLING CO.... OF LA._.____ 00190 ..001-400-1208-4305 00515___ _ $290.34 ... . ..16822204_.04884 __ _ 26832 VEND MACH SUPPLIES 22204 06/16/88 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 06/23/88 i• I..v *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** PERVO PAINT CO. STREET PAINT/THINNER 66375 PERVO PAINT CO. TRAFFIC PAINT/THINNER 16154 01316 06/07/88 _ $290.34 115-400-3104-4309 00564_ . $1,65L74. 74. .. _66375_05799 ____ 26833 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 06/23/88 05742 26833 $0.00 06/23/88 01316 115-400-3104-4309 00565 06/07/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY $2.995.31 66043/16154 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL_******************************************************************** _ _ _— _ R POSTMASTER P.O. BOX RENTAL 00398 001-400-2101-4305 00734 $39.00 695 06/13/88 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 695 06335 26834 $0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************_ $39.00 _________ R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP BENEFITS/JULY 88 PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS, _C0.. EMP BENEFITS/JULY 88 PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP BENEFITS/JULY 88 00585 001-400-1212-4188 01072 06/15/88 EMP BENEFITS 00585 105-400-2601-4188 00529 06/15/88 STREET LIGHTING 00585 110-400-3302-4188 00699 06/15/88 PARKING ENF PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. _ 00585 EMP BENEFITS/JULY 88 T ^T! 06/15/88 R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. 00585 EMP BENEFITS/JULY 88 06/15/88 _115-400-3101-4188 00432_. MEDIANS 115-400-3104-4188 00468 $73.75 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.75 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $6.50 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00038 26835 $0.00 06/22/88 _____________00038 _....00038 _... 26835 $0.00 06/22/88 $0.50 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.75 TRAFFIC SAFETY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0038 26835 $0.00 06/22/88 .__.. 00038 26835 ____, $0.00 06/22/88 I. 00038 26835 $0.00 06/22/88 v 1 J 0 410. 4.0 FINANCE—SFA340 _ TIME 17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME ,_...._._ __DESCRIPTION R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. EMP BENEFITS/JULY 88 sr 'CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH`•'' DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT _..DATE_INVC.. PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00585 160-400-3102-4188 •00470 *1.75 06/15/88 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PAGE 0020 DATE 06/23/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT _UNENC—_-DATE EXP 00038 26835 *0.00 06/22/88 . *** . VENDOR TOTAL**********************************•n*********** rte****#*ter*# t a *a** _ *86..00 _—_ _._ _ R THE*RELIABLE CORPORATION CALCULATOR/BLDG 59400 R.__ THE*RELIABLE CORPORATION. . DRAFTING CHAIR 59401 01447 001-400-1207-4305 00128 05/03/88 BUS LICENSE *65.94 15859400. 01736 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *63.85 ____01447. ..001-400-4201-4305 00312__ _$89.99__15859401_ _ . 01732 05/06/88 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *8 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************_.._._ _.. *155.93. R _. _ OFCR DAVID*RICKEY __.. _ 00949 TUIT/MEALS/ADV OFCR TRNG 06/14/88 001-400-2101-4312 ._ 00684_ . _$32.50 _ _._ .. _ POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR.TOTAL******************************************************************** — .. — .*32.50 MARY._ C. *ROONEY__ REIMB TUITION _ 00302 _ _.001-400-4601-4316 00087._ ... *254.00 06/09/88 COMM RESOURCES /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** _ R ROYAL TRUCK BODY - _ AN CONTROL TRUCK BODY 26812 I I 26836 06/23/88 26836 —_ 5.15 06/23/88 i.. _____06349 .. _ . 26837._ *0.00 06/23/88 *254.00 _ 01805 001-400-2401-5400 00002_ $4,968.-23_. 06/15/88 ANIMAL CONTROL /EQUIPMENT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES__ ENG SERV/PUB WORKS 88249 R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES ENG SERV/PUB WORKS 88248 01578 001-400-4202-4201 00189._ 06/01/88 PUB WKS ADMIN 01578 06/01/88 115-400-3104-4201 00054 TRAFFIC SAFETY 04872 _._ _. 26838 ... _ .. _ *0.00 06/23/88 1 _________26812 -26812 _.05280 *4.968. 23 26839 *0.00 06/23/88 *250.00 _88249_06428 . .. _ 26840 ._ /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 06/23/88 *100.00 88247/88248-06428 26840 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 06/23/88 ***_VENDOR_ TOTAL***************P**************************************************** _ _ *350.00_._ SAFETY LINE, INC. HOT STICK/FIRE DEPT. L 02309 001-400-2201-4309 00459._ *152.53 2752 06/10/88 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 2752 05337 26841 *0.00 06/23/88 a :std°�'•� FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0021 .1 FOR 06/28/88 DATE 06/23/88 10 ... _ 1010 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # __,_DESCRIPTION___ -_---._ ....__.__..,_.. DATE..INVC _.PROJ # _ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT. SINENC_._ DATE_EXP__ *** VENDOR TOTAL********************•x***•***********•*******************m************ *152. 53 SAFEWAY SIGN _COMPANY_____• . - - _. .... _ ___ 00021. __115-400-3104-4309 .00563 ___ _ .. $1,946.29 30559 ._.05748 .__ 26842 ___. STOP SIGNS 30559 05/13/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 06/23/88 1 ************************ *** *** VENDOR TOTAL * **** ************************************10_10 .-. $1,946.29 10-10__ .--_._ 10__10.. _ _ R 1010_ OFCR R.*SALDANA _ _ 02165 ..001-400-2101-4316 00237 .._. _ $14-50 T..__-_ 06310 ___ _ 26843 MEALS/SALDANA/GARRETT 05/23/88 POLICE /TRAINING *0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • 1044."I. *14..50 . SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 00151 __001-400-2101-4312 00683,.__ *752.00 _ _52139___06351____ 26844 LASER TRNG/8 OFFICERS 52139 06/14/88 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** _ *752.00 I � V SHOOP & LUTHER, INC..__ 10 10__ 02310 _001-400-3103-4311 00360 . , *29. 14. _.. _1010 , _____1010_. 10155_..06446 ..._.... _ 26845.. ___.� ST SWEEPER OILS 10155 06/16/88 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *0.00 06/23/88 *29. 14 " *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** SINCLAIR PAINT CO._ MISC CHCS/JUNE 88 01399 001-400-4204-4309 00961_.. *210. 07 __-.___-_ 00638 ___ 26846 06/15/88 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************_ 1010_*210.07 v 1 " SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT_DISTR.00843 145-400-3403-4251 00015 *832.00T 44265. 06145 __ 26847 BUS PASS SALES/MAY 88 44265 06/01/88 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *0.00 06/23/88 i i' *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $832.00 SOUTH BAY COALITION _ALIVE 01288 001-400-4601-4201 00201._ *1,000.00__, 04882 1010._ 26848.._ CONTRACT PMT/MAY 88 06/16/88 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 06/23/88-- 1. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * 1, 000. 00 N .J" v � R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER _ 00113 _ _ 001-400-2201-4309.. , 00457___. . .. *97.45 _ . _________00640 . _ _ 26849 MISC CHGS/JUN 88 06/15/88- FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 06/23/88 1 ___] • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME _. DESCRIPTION __._.. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 4,1 0 PAGE 0022 ; !hi DATE 06/23/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC. PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION. _._—__—_._...__ AMOUNT. UNENC__..DATE EXP ... *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************+r*********s*********************** SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL BLOOD ALCOHOL/NOV-APR 88 00107 001-400-2101-4306 06/07/88 POLICE 1697.45 00535._ . .. _. ... 6814.35 .. .. ______________06338 ._ . 26850 _... /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 60.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** . 6814.35 __R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL..COURT CITATION BAIL _ _ 00400 110-300-0000-3302 . 21692_.. 6156. 00 __06148 06/16/88 /COURT FINES/PARKING 60.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** SOUTH BAY WELDERS_.. MISC CHCS/MAY 88 SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHGS/MAY 88 00018 001-400-2201-4309 00456_.. 05/31/88 FIRE 00018 001-400-3103-4309 00653 _ 05/31/88 ST MAINTENANCE SOUTH BAY WELDERS_ _ _ _...__.. ___ _ 00018 MISC CHCS/MAY 88 05/31/88 105-400-2601-4309 00355.. STREET LIGHTING 6156.00 ._ 648. 46 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1613.17 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 613.18 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 674.81 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO._ ELEC DILLINGS/MAY 88 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLINGS/MAY 88 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLINGS/MAY 88 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLINGS/MAY 88 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00236 05/31/88 BLDG MAINT 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00204 05/31/88 PARKS _ 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00137 05/31/88 STREET LIGHTING 00159 05/31/88 R , SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.___.____ 00159 _ ELEC BILLINGS/MAY 88 05/31/88 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO._ .. ELEC BILLINGS/MAY 88 115-400-3101-4303 00160 MEDIANS 115-400-3104-4303 00093 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00159 _ 160-400-3102-4303 00078 05/31/88 SEWER/ST DRAIN $5.390.87.._ /UTILITIES $541.55 /UTILITIES $172.54 /UTILITIES 1645.15 /UTILITIES 16481.41 ____._.. /UTILITIES $61.41 /UTILITIES 26851 06/23/88 r 00542 ._. 26852 160.00 06/23/88 00542 26852 .. J 60.00 06/23/88 ___________00542 __ 26852 60.00 06/23/88 __ 06247 26853 60.00 06/23/88 I 06247 26853 60.00 06/23/88 ._.06247 26853 60.00 06/23/88 M. 06247 26853 $0.00 06/23/88 _____ 06247 __.. 26853 60.00 06/23/88 06247 26853 60.00 06/23/88 s FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION _. _ _... _ __. DATE_INVC ____.. PROJ # ..... . ACCOUNT_ DESCRIPTION ______—_______ - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT *** VENDOR TOTAL ************ •p•**** ***a**+*** *****+ ***** **** r***********►w***gra 4.1 PAGE 0023 DATE 06/23/88 __.. INV/REF PO it CHK # AMOUNT_ UNENC _....DATE .EXP. _. $6.692.93 R ____ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. __ ____ 00171 __105-400-8201-4201. 0004Q_____ $245..00 06434.___._ 26854 ST LITE RISER COSTS 06/14/88 CIP 85-201 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/23/88 ___*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** _ $245.00 _._.__-- . ._.._._ • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00442 .105-400-2601-4303 00136�... _.$14, 459..02 00013 ___ 26855 ST LITES/MAY 88 05/31/88 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** ...$14.459.02 ._.._— SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP WATER COOLER RENT/MAY 88 46448 R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP WATER COOLER RENT/MAY 88 83370 • SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP_ WATER COOLER RENT/MAY 88 54474 00146 .001-400-2101-4305 00732 05/31/88 POLICE 00146 001-400-4204-4201 00250 05/31/88 BLDG MAINT $0.00 06/23/88 .$104.16__ _546448__00033 /OFFICE•OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 06/23/88 *28.95 583370 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00033 26856 $0.00 06/23/88 1 _ 00146 _001-400-4601-4305 00510._ *28.85 _554474_00033_ 26856 05/31/88 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • SPIDELL VOLLEYBALL TROPHIES $161.96 01238 _001-400-4601-4308 00120 $230.04___ __4880_ _ 04880 .. _. 26857 _ 4880 06/15/88 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS $0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R STUART CONSTRUCTION CO.___. POLICE DEPT REMODEL SERV 3 06/15/88 $230.04 001-400-8606-4201 00022 $25.022.56_ _3 06449 CIP 87-606 /CONTRACT SERVICE PRIVATE $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • MEGAN*SULLIVAN CITE PMT REFUND $25.022.56 26858 . 06/23/88 1- T.__. 02305. _1.10-300-0000-3302 __21691_._. $18.00 ______7201.56.._06139 26859.. _—_. 20156 06/16/88 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** _ R XAIFT LABORATORIES 17777-- EXAM GLOVES/POLICE L_ $18.00 _02308 001-400-2101-4309_ 00148 . , $158.95 . _ —..32493.._.05634 __. _ 26860 32493 05/06/88, POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 06/23/88 1 • • i • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 • PAY VENDOR NAME ._ DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # DATE.INVC PAGE 0024 DATE 06/23/88 AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ____._ __ .. . AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************.x***************************************** TASSIE'S FLOWERS _ FLOWERS/CITY ATTY $158.95 02307 001-400-1101-4319 00049_.. #34.61 _ 17962 06/02/88 CITY COUNCIL /SPECIAL EVENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** #34.61 R TIME BUSINESS FORMS .__.. PRINT SERVICE/BLDG _ 01516 _001-400-4201-4305 00311 36432 06/13/88 BUILDING .�j t1 4°J • ._..__.11962 04096 . 26861 _._. $0.00 06/23/88 I • $314.18 _____36432_ 04953 ._ 26862 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $314.18 * * * TODD PIPE & SUPPLY PLUMBING SUPPLIES R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY MISC CHCS/JUN 88 _ 00124 001-400-4204-4309 00963.. 06/13/88 BLDG MAINT . 00124 001-400-6101-4309 00518 06/15/88 PARKS $144.78. /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $34.02 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** --__#178.80_._ R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL__ CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 �. .__.R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 00240 001-400-1212-4188 01067 06/15/88 EMP BENEFITS 00240 105-400-2601-4188 00524 06/15/88 STREET LIGHTING 00240 110-400-3301-4188 00518 06/15/89 VEH PKO DIST 00240 110-400-3302-4188 00694 06/15/88 PARKING ENF 00240 115-400-3101-4188 00427 06/15/88 MEDIANS 00240 115-400-3104-4188 00463 06/15/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00240 145-400-3401-4188 00465 06/15/88 DIAL A RIDE $187.00 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.49 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS • $8.19 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $11.46 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.49 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.49 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.73 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS __________.06445 _. 26863 $0.00 06/23/88 00646 26863 $0.00 06/23/88 00029 26864 $0.00 06/22/88 00029 26864 $0.00 06/22/88 00029 26864 $0.00 06/22/88 00029 26864 $0.00 06/22/88 00029 26864 $0.00 06/22/88 _ 00029 26864 #0.00 06/22/88 00029 26864 $0.00 06/22/88 ; • FINANCE–SFA340 TIME 17:16:13 PAY VENDOR NAME _DESCRIPTION R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL. CITY HEALTH INS/JULY 88 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/28/88 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC.._ .PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ..._.. PAGE 0025 DATE 06/23/88 INV/REF PO # CHK # _—_.__ __AMOUNT_UNENC. _ DATE EXP 00240 145-400-3402-4188 ,00463 $0.55 06/15/88 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS __00240 ._.145-400-3407-4188 00207 .._. $0.55. _______. 06/15/88 COMTR BUS STUDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************lar*********#****************** TRW SKI CLUB DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND' 56849 06/20/88 $212.95 00029 26864 $0.00 06/22/88 ________00029 _ 26864 $0.00 06/22/88 _ 02313 001-210-0000-2110. 02237__.. $100.00 __- _56849. 05941 26865 .__ /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** J. F. *WEBER. CONSULTANT PROF SERV/GANN INIT $100. 00 _ 00134 001-400-1202-4201 00137.___. $559.00 __.06245 _ 26866 __ ___ 06/11/88 FINANCE ADMIN, /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/23/88 • $559.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** WHEREHOUSE ENTERTAINMENT INC. ., VIDEO TAPES 13213 01743 .001-400-2101-4305 06/10/88 210003 POLICE :! .0 1 00733 $84.99 __ _13213 .. 06304 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** ROBERT P. *WHITE _ TEMP SIGN DEPOSIT REFUND 12647 02315 001-210-0000-2110 02238 06/20/88 $84.99 $250.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** _ _ SALLY A. *WHITE -------- ________ SEC SERV/JUNE 7.1988 26867 06/23/88 12647 . 05940 .. 26868 $0.00 06/23/88 •.J $250.00 00140 _ .._001-400-4102-4201 00156_,_. $272.00__.. _06014 26869 06/15/88 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/23/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** XEROX CORPORATION XEROX DRY INK/BLDG 38337 00135 .001-400-1208-4305 00517 05/23/88 GEN APPROP 1 . *272.00 • _$89.46 _135038337. _.04955 ____ 26870 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 06/23/88 __ --I *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** •J $89.46 . t4 .RtOY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY r1E WARRANTS USTEO'bi'PAGE 1cLUSIYE OF YHAWARRANT REGISTER FOR =WWI *** PAY CODE TOTAL**************************************************************** __$187..827,_83_.ANOFUN Rt A LAKE --• r--- . ev / FINANCE AOMINI RAT.OI; I *** TOTAL WARRANTS_****************************************************************** $756.876.48 . 1 June 20, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 28, 1988 APPROVAL OF OUTSTANDING EMPLOYEE PROGRAM Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council Approve the attached Em- ployee Recognition Program Background: The attached Administrative Memorandum was developed in order to create a mechanism to recognize employees who display commendable performance. Analysis: Following approval of the City Council, the attached Administra- tive Memorandum will be distributed to all Department Directors, employees, and employee organizations. In addition, a press release will be prepared and distributed to the Easy Reader, Dai- ly Breeze, and Los Angeles Times to announce the program. This proposed program will allow outstanding employees to be nominated for recognization by fellow employees, supervisors, Department Directors, or other citizens. Nominations for the award will be solicited by the Personnel Department at the conclusion of each calendar quarter and will be reviewed by the Department Directors who will sit as a Perfor- mance Award Committee. An employee(s) approved for the award by the Committee will be presented to the City Council for recognition and will be awarded a plaque signifying the event and bearing the City Seal. The first quarter for which employees will be eligible for this recognition will be July - September 1988. Respectfully Submitted, Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Concur: evin N. North a t City Manager CITY MANAGER COMMENT: This program is strongly recommended as a very effective and inexpensive way to recognize outstanding contributions by our employees. It has the potential to improve morale, as well as public understanding of and appreciation for the City's activities. lg ADMINISTRATIVE MEMORANDUM TO: All Full -Time Employees FUNCTION: Personnel FROM: Kevin B. Northcraft NO: P-8 City Manager SUBJECT: Employee Performance Recognition Program PURPOSE: To publicly recognize full-time employees of the City of Hermosa Beach for either sustained performance above expected levels or for one-time actions of an exceptional nature. POLICIES: Recommendations for recognition should be based upon the follow- ing factors: * Overall Job Performance * Application of personal skills, knowledge and abilities * Positive work attitude * Dedication to duties * Attendance/Punctuality/IOD safety Record * Courteous manner * Supportive of City and Department policies and goals * Involvement in community activities Definitions: A. Sustained Performance Above Expected Levels Explanation and examples of Sustained Performance Above Expec- ted Levels must be clearly documented. Justification must be offered that indicates the individual's performanace has reached a level beyond that which reasonably could be expected, and that this level has been sustained throughout the performance ap- praisal review period. Examples of performance that could be considered under this criterion are: 1. Repeatedly taking individual initiative to develop im- proved methods to perform assigned job duties; 2. Completing long term or frequent short term special proj- ects while maintaining high efficiency in regularly assigned job duties; 3. Repeatedly accepting additional responsibilities during extended periods of staffing shortages or abnormally heavy work loads; 4. Continually recommending new and innovative ideas to im- prove efficiencies and productivity, which are adopted; S. Continually accomplishing all major job objectives and accountabilities of the position in a manner above the expected level B. One-time Actions This criterion is intended to reward an employee whose per- formance exceeds expectations during special, non -routine or unique situations. Justification should be offered that explains the nature of the action and the positive or measurable impact this action had on the City. The merits of a one-time action will be judged concurrently with the evaluation of an employee's ongoing performance. Examples of One -Time Actions that could be considered for a meritorious award are: 1. Handling in an exceptional manner an unusual or non- routine high -impact situation . 2. Handling in an exceptional manner a special project as- signed in addition to normal job responsibilities. 3. Developing a procedure, handling a transaction, identify- ing an inefficiency or correcting an omission that results in a significant cost saving or eliminates a potentially costly situation. APPLICABILITY: The provisions of this policy apply to all permanent full-time employees. Department Directors are not eligible for recogniza- tion under this policy. ADMINISTRATION: Recommendations and justification will be solicited by the Direc- tor of Personnel at the conclusion of each calendar year quarter. Recommendations can be made by Department Directors, Department Supervisors, other employees, and/or other members of the public. Following receipt of the recommendations they will be reviewed by the Performance Award Committee which consists of all Department Directors. Following consensus approval by the Committee, an appropriate ceremony will be scheduled before the City Council where the em- ployee to be recognized will be presented with a tile wall -plaque signifying the award and bearing his/her name. Additionally, acknowledgment of the award will be posted outside the City Coun- cil chambers and distributed to the local newspaper. Kevin B. Northcraft Robert A. Blackwood City Manager Personnel Director .w June 20, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 28, 1988 RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE DISPOSAL OF FIREARMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 12028.0 OF THE CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Police Department to dispose of a quantity of confiscated weapons and some departmental weapons in accordance with section 12028.0 of the California Penal Code. BACKGROUND: The Police Department has approximately forty-seven (47) firearms which have been cleared for disposal in accordance with section 12028.0 (c) of the California Penal Code. Additionally, there are several firearms belonging to the department which can be disposed of in favor of more useable items. The Penal Code allows the disposal of firearms only once each year, between July 1 and July 10. Procedures set forth allow licensed federal fireams dealers to bid on the firearms and allows the Police Chief of the City to make an award to the most suitable bidder. It is common practice to have the dealers bid for exchange or trade of the firearms for usable equipment and firearms for the department. Several licensed dealers have contacted the department regarding the possible disposition of the firearms in our custody and have indicated a willingness to bid on them. It is our intention to allow qualified, licensed bidders to submit a sealed bid to be opened on July 5, 1988. This will allow adequate time to check the bids and credentials of the dealers and make the award within the time constraints. CONCUR,/, Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager L1. ctubmitted, Steve . ^isniewski Director of Public Safety CITY MANAGER COMMENT: The Chief indicates the dealers involved sell to law enforce- ment agencies as opposed to the general public. Also, "Saturday night specials" will be destroyed rather than offered for sale. These precautions should assure that auctioned weapons will not again be used for unlawful purposes. 11: § 12027 CONTROL OF DEADLY WEAPONS any money, treasure, bullion, bonds, or other thing of value within this state. (1) Members of any club or organization organized for the purpose of practicing shooting at targets upon established target ranges, whether public or private, while such members are using any of the firearms referred to in this chapter upon such target ranges, or while going to and from such ranges. (g) Licensed hunters or fishermen while engaged in hunting or fishing, or while going to or returning from such hunting or fishing expedition. (h) Transportation of unloaded firearms by a person operating a licensed common carrier or an authorized agent or employee thereof when transported in conform- ance with applicable federal law. (i) Upon approval of the sheriff of the county in which they reside, honorably retired federal officers or agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secret Service, the United States Customs Service, the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, and the Drug Enforcement Administration who were assigned to duty within the state for a period of not less than one year, or who retired from active service in the state. Retired federal officers or agents shall carry identifica- tion indicating their retired federal status and shall provide the sheriff with certification from the agency from which they retired certifying their service in the state, the nature of their retirement, and indicating the agency's concurrence that the retired federal officer or agent should be accorded the privilege of carrying a concealed firearm. The sheriff of the county in which the retired federal officer or agent resides may require recertification prior to a permit renewal, and may suspend the privilege for cause. The sheriff may charge a fee necessary to cover any reasonable expenses incurred by the county. (Added by Stats.19S3, c. 36, § 1. Amended by Stats.1959. a 1854, § 1; Stats.1963, c. 1677, § I; Stats.196S, c. 281. §2; Stats.1968, c. 1222, § 61: Stats.1969, c. 1012, § 1:, Stars.1974, c. 1090. § 1; Stats.1980, c. 1340, § 24: Stats. 1981. c. 32, § 2: Stats. 1984, c. 351. § 1: Stats 1986. c. 937. § 2: Stats.1987, c. 115. § l: Stats.1987. a 700,. §3.) 810 Part 4 (a) (1) Any peace officer, listed in Section 830.1 or 830.2, whether active or honorably retired, other duly appointed peace officers, honorably retired peace officers listed in subdivision (c) of Section 830.5, full-time paid peace officers of other states and the federal government who are carrying out official duties while in California, or any person summoned by any of these officers to assist in making arrests or preserving the peace while he or she is actually engaged in assisting that officer. Any peace officer described in this paragraph who has been honor- ably retired shall be issued an identification certificate by the agency the officer retired from. Any officer retired after January 1, 1981, shall have an endorsement on the identification stating that the issuing agency approves the officer's carrying of a firearm. The endorsement shall also include the date when the en- dorsement is to be renewed. (2) A retired peace officer who retired after January 1, 1981, shall petition the issuing agency for the renewal of his or her privilege to carry a concealed firearm every five years. An honorably retired peace officer, described in paragraph (1), retired prior to January 1, 1981. shall not he required to obtain an endorsement from the issuing agency to carry a firearm. The agency from which a peace officer is honorably retired may, upon initial retirement of that peace officer, or at any time subse- quent thereto, deny or revoke, for good cause the retired officer's privilege to carry a firearm. (3) An honorably retired peace officer listed in subdi- vision (c) of Section 830.5 authorized to carry firearms by this subdivision shall meet the training requirements of Section 832 and shall qualify with the firearm at least annually. The individual retired peace officer shall be responsible for maintaining his or her eligibility to carry a firearm. The Department of Justice shall provide subse- quent arrest notification pursuant to Section 11105.2 regarding honorably retired peace officers listed in subdi- vision (c) of Section 830.5 to the agency from which the officer has retired. (b) The possession or transportation of unloaded fire- arms as merchandise by a person engaged in the business of manufacturing, repairing, or dealing in firearms who is licensed to engage in that business or the authorized representative or authorized agent of that person while engaged in the lawful course of the business. (c) Members of the Army, Navy. or Marine Corps of the United States. or the National Guard. when on duty. or organizations which are by law authorized to purchase or receive such weapons from the United States or this Mate. (d) Duh' authorized military or civil organizations while par:tdin:. or the members thereof when going to and other financial institutions -• to and about the shipment. transportation. or deli\ ery of Cross References Dtsarmtng pnsoner. see § 846 Humane o0icers. right to carr) weapons. see Civil Code § 601. Machine guns. sale to or posses ton b' police departments. shcn4 mashall. and mdnar. and naval forces. see § 12201 Peace officers' e\empnon from pro.lstons of this chapter, see $ I200✓4 Retired peace officers. see Business and Professions Code f Tear gas weapons, official use by peace officers, see § 12407. . 12028. Firearms and other weapons as surrender of weapon: sale at public auction -iron to .owner. destruction _a-" 'ging npOa dir ,ubt•tance. other than fixed ammunition, dote 811 Title 2 as provided in Section 12020, the unlawful concealed carrying upon the person or within the vehicle or the carrier of any of the weapons mentioned in Section 12025, and the unlawful possession or carrying of any item in violation of Section 653k is a nuisance. (b) A firearm of any nature used in the commission of any misdemeanor as provided in this code or any felony, or an attempt to commit any misdemeanor as provided in this code or any felony, is, upon a conviction of the defendant, or upon a juvenile court finding that an offense which would be a misdemeanor or felony if committed by an adult was committed or attempted by the juvenile with the use of a firearm, a nuisance. A finding that the defendant was guilty of the offense but was insane at the time the offense was committed is a conviction for the purposes of this section. (c) Any weapon described in subdivision (a), or, upon conviction of the defendant or a juvenile court finding that an offense which would be a misdemeanor or felony if committed by an adult was committed or attempted by the juvenile with the use of a firearm, any weapon described in subdivision (b), shall be surrendered to the sheriff of a county or the chief of police or other head of a municipal police department of any city or city and county. The officers to whom the weapons are surren- dered, except upon the certificate of a judge of a court of record, or of the district attorney of the county, that the retention thereof is necessary or proper to the ends of justice, may annually, between the 1st and 10th days of July, in each year, offer the weapons, which the officers in charge of them consider to have value with respect to sporting, recreational, or collection purposes, for sale at public auction to persons licensed under federal law to engage in businesses involving any weapon purchased. If any weapon has been stolen and is thereafter recovered from the thief or his or her transferee, or is used in such a manner as to constitute a nuisance pursuant to subdivi- sion (a) or (b) without the prior knowledge of its lawful owner that it would be so used, it shall not be so offered for sale but shall be restored to the lawful owner, as soon as its use as evidence has been served, upon his or her identification of the weapon and proof of ownership. (d) If, under this section, a weapon is not of the type that can be sold to the public, generally, or is not sold pursuant to subdivision (c) the weapon shall in the month of July, next succeeding, or sooner, if necessary to conserve Local resources including space and utilization of personnel who maintain files and security of 'those weapons, be destroyed so that it can no longer be used as such weapon except upon the certificate of a judge of a court of record, or of the district attorney of the county, that the retention of it is necessary or proper to the ends of justice. (e) This section does not apply to any firearm in the possession of the Department of Fish and Game or which was used in the violation of any provision of 1 in the Fish and Game Code or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto, or which is forfeited pursuant to Section 5008.6 of the Public Resources Code. CONCEALED WEAPONS § 12028.5 (f) No stolen weapon shall be sold or destroyed pursuant to subdivision (c) or (d) unless reasonable notice is given to its lawful owner, if his or her identity and address can be reasonably ascertained. (Added by Stats. 1953, c. 36, § 1. Amended by Stats.1963, c. 1677, § 2; Stats.1970, c. 1057, § 1; Stat. 1971, c. 1271, § 2; Stats.1980, c. 558, § 1; Stats.1982, c. 142, § 6: Stats. 1983, c. 39Z § 1; Stats.1984, c. 1430, § 1; Stats.1987, c. 761, § 1; Stats.1987, c. 1461, § 2.5.) 1 So in original. Cross References Firearms capable of being concealed upon the person, see § 12001. Licenses to carry concealed weapons. see § 12050 et seq. Public nuisances, see Civil Code § 3490 et seq. Search of defendant in presence of magistrate and retention of weapons. see § 1542. Switch -blade knives having blades longer than two inches, see § 653k. § 12028.5. Domestic violence incidents; temporary custody of firearms by officers; receipt; release of firearm; stolen firearms; unrecovered firearms (a) As used in this section, the following words have the following meanings: (1) "Abuse" means intentionally or recklessly causing or attempting to cause bodily injury, or placing another person in reasonable apprehension of imminent serious bodily injury to himself, herself, or another. (2) "Domestic violence" is abuse perpetrated against a family or household member. (3) "Family or household member" means a spouse, former spouse, parent, child, any other person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the last six months, regularly resided in the household. (b) A sheriff, undersheriff, deputy sheriff, marshal, deputy marshal, or police officer of a city, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 830.1, a member of the University of California Police Department, as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 830.2, and a member of a California State University Police Department, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 830.2, who is at the scene of a domestic violence incident involving a threat to human life or a physical assault, may take temporary custody of any firearm in plain sight or discovered pursuant to a consensual search as necessary for the protection of the peace officer or other persons present. Upon taking custody of a firearm, the officer shall give the owner or person who possessed the firearm a receipt. The receipt shall describe the firearm and list any identification or serial number on the firearm. The receipt shall indicate where the firearm can be recovered and the date after which the owner or possessor can recover the firearm. No firearm shall be held less than 48 hours. If a firearm is not retained for use as evidence related to criminal charges brought as a result of the domestic violence incident or is not retained because it was illegally possessed, the firearm shall be made available to the owner or person who was in lawful possession 48 hours after the seizure or as soon thereafter as possible, but no J June 23, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council June 28, 1988 GROUP DYNAMICS PROFESSIONAL BEACH VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff that City Council approve the attached modification to Group Dynamics request for a Professional Beach Volleyball Tournament on August 27-28, 1988. BACKGROUND At the April 12, 1988, City Council meeting, the permit request submitted by Group Dynamics Inc. for a Women's Professional Beach Volleyball Tournament on August 27-28 was approved (see attached permit request). The approval brought the 1988 summer professional tournament roster to three (3); one men's and two women's events. Subsequently, as Group Dynamics solicited sponsorship for the event, they discovered difficulties procuring support for the originally proposed women's tourney. Instead they found a clothing sponsor (I Dig Sportswear) who would support a six -person open volleyball tournament with a "Legends" (older well-known players) exhibition. I Dig Sportswear would be the title sponsor of the event with Coors Lite as the presenting sponsor. Attached (FYI) you will find a list of all other 1988 professional and amatuer volleyball tournaments scheduled to date. ANALYSIS Group Dynamics, Inc. acted as the marketing firm for the Miller Lite Men's Pro Tourney from 1985-1987. Last summer they also conducted the Le Coq Sportif Women's Pro Tourney in Hermsoa Beach. To date, Group Dynamics has always presented professional and orderly events in the City. They have cooperated with all of our requests and have been responsive to our concerns. Whether or not switching the tournament from women's to a 6 -person event Ea increase spectator -draw remains to be seen, however, our new pro tournament policy addresses security concerns and should prove to insure a safe and successful event. ip 1 At the June 22nd meeting the Community Resources Advisory Commission unanimously approved the change. The 6 -person tourney may add a nice balance to the pro season; providing one men's event, one women's event and one team event. Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Respectfully submitted, Mary ..'ooney, Coordinator Dep'. ,f Community Resources June 2, 1988 Mary Rooney Department of Community Resources City of Hermosa Beach 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mary: This is a request to modify the status of our August 27-28 permit to conduct a Pro Beach Volleyball tournament in Hermosa Beach. Because of difficulties in procuring sponsorship for the 2—woman tournament originally proposed, and based on sponsor interest in the demographics of other volleyball tournament formats, we are requesting approval to hold a 6—person open volleyball tournament and a 'Legends' exhibition on the same dates and at the same site as originally approved. The title sponsor of the event would be I Dig Sportswear, with Coors Light as the presenting sponsor. Coppertone will probably be involved on a co—sponsor level. Although the player field for the 6—person event will be greater than that of the 2—woman event, we anticipate crowds certainly no greater than the women's pro event held last year in Hermosa Beach. In fact, we anticipate lighter than usual parking/crowd control problems because the event, 1) is a first—year tournament, 2) will involve no top names, and 3) will involve many local residents as participants (walking or biking to the event.) Thank you for considering our request for this permit modification. We await your reply. Cordially, Alan Shaw Account Supervisor 2601 Ocean Park Boulevard, Suite 309 Santa Monica, California 90405 (213) 452-5056 TELEX 510-601.2864 TELEFAX (213) 452-0309 11702 Lions Station Plaza Hanzomon 5-4, Kojlmachi 1-chome, Chlyoda-ku, Tokyo 102 Japan TEL (03) 221-6040 TELEFAX (03) 221-6740 April 4, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council April 12, 19.88 WOMEN'S PROFESSIONAL BEACH VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by staff and the Community Resources Commission that City Council approve the attached permit request for a Women's Professional Beach Volleyball Tournament (submitted by Group Dynamics, Inc.) and direct staff to negotiate a contract per the conditions of our pro tournament policy. BACKGROUND At the March 28, 1988, Community Resources Commission meeting, the Commissioners unamiously approved the attached permit request. There have been two (2) professional tournaments scheduled for this season to date: A Women's event on July 23 -24th and a Men's event on Sept. 24 -25th. Because this tournament, if approved, would add one more pro tournament to the summer, the Commission is requesting Council's final endorsement of the event. The request submitted by Group Dynamics is to conduct a Women's Pro Tournament on August 27-28, 1988. Last summer, Group Dynamics conducted Hermosa's first Women's professional tournament. Attached (FYI) you will find a list of all 1988 professional and amatuer volleyball tournaments scheduled to date. ANALYSIS Group Dynamics, Inc. acted as the marketing firm for the Miller Lite Men's Pro Tourney from 1985-1987. Last summer they also conducted the Le Coq Sportif Women's Pro Tourney in Hermosa Beach. To date, Group Dynamics has always presented professional and orderly events in the City. They have cooperated with all of our requests and have been responsive to our concerns. Last summer's Le Coq Sportif event was especially smooth running and had no negative incidents. 10 It is anticipated this same kind of success would occur with the proposed 1988 tournament. Concur: Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources kevin Northcraft City Manager ectfJ submitted, Mary C./4oney, Coordinator Dep . qf Community Resources VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENTS 1988 f AMATUER VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENTS: May 21-22 June 11-12 Aug. 6-7 Men's A Men's Master Women's Open CBVA CBVA CBVA PRO VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENTS: July 23-24 Women's Pritchard Sept. 24-25 Men's AVP 41. City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 376-6984 extension 280 or 379-3312 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION Organization's Name: GROUP DYNAMICS, INC. Profit XX Non -Profit Non-profit Number Organization's Address: 2601 OCEAN PARK BLVD., SANTA MONICA, CA Zip Code 90405 Phone Number(s): (213) 452 - 5056 Contact Person and Title: Jack Butefish, President Contact Person's Address: SAME Zip Code Daytime Phone Number:sAME Evening Phone Number: Brief Description of Event: WOMEN'S PROFESSIONAL BEACH VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT Date (s) of Event: AUGUST 27-28, 1988 Location(s) of Event: The Pier (North side) Set-up Time:g nn AM on Friday. August 26th Time Event is to Commence: 7:00 *AM AUGUST 27th Number of Participants (Including volunteers): 75 Anticipated Number of Spectators: 2,000 - 3,000/day Number of Vehicles Involved and How Used: one (1) equipment truck 2-5 sponsor display vehicles, staff cars (approx. 10) Description of Set—up for this Event: SAME AS OUR 1987 LE COQ SPORTIF WOMEN'S PRO BEACH EVENT. rj Additional Information or Special Requests: Fees, Charges and Other Requirements: Police Costs Fire Costs Business License Public Works Costs Processing Fee Other Costs Total Due Refundable Damage Deposit $ Damage Deposit is due: Balance of fees incurred are due: Insurance Required: Yes No Date Received Unless greater or lessor coverage is requested, applicant agrees to furnish the City of Hermosa beach evidence of $1 million comprehensive general liability insurance in the form of a certificate, covering the entire period of this permit, naming the City of Hermosa Beach and its employees as additional insureds. Expiration Date . Permittee waives claims against the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees, for fees or damages caused by, arising out of, or in any way connected with the exercise of this permit. APPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND TO MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION AND TO RETURN SAID PREMISES IN THE SAME CONDITION AS THEY WERE BEFORE SAID USE. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. A FEES, CHARGES AND OTHER NECESSARY MATERIAL WILL BE PAID AND/0' FURNISHED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCE S MUTUALLY AGREED TO BY BOTH 41111; AdO�f gnage • Re•restative Date Permit to be processed through City Council: YesNo If YES, Council's decision: Application is invalid without the following signatures: Department of Community Date Resouces Police Department Date Authorization Fire Department Date Authorization if Required Life Guard Authorization Date Needed on all Water Events June 21, 1988 City Council Meeting June 28, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-932 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A FIRE FLOW FEE TO UPGRADE FIRE PROTECTION AND TO ASSIST CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS TO MEET UNIFORM FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS. Resubmitted for waiver of further reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 88-932 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of June 14, 1988, this ordinance was reintroduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Concur: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Mayor Simpson Williams None None Ka hleen Midstokke, City Clerk evin B. North aft, City Manager 2a 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88- 932 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ESTABLISHING A FIRE FLOW FEE TO UPGRADE FIRE PROTECTION AND TO ASSIST CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS TO MEET UNIFORM FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City. of Hermosa Beach recognizes the serious problems with the water system within the city which creates fire risks when new construction increases density and/or fire exposure; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach desires to establish a system in which improvements are made to the fire water flow protection system in order to increase the level of fire protection within the city; WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish a fire protec- tion water system for developments in which the burdens added to the system by new development are paid for by the developers of projects; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that all additions of new dwelling units and/or additional square footage to existing structures increases the demand on the fire protection system within the city; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the City of Hermosa Beach was originally developed as a less dense resort community and has since developed into a highly developed, densely packed residential community which has placed additional burdens on the fire protection water system; WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that improvement of the fire protection water system will benefit existing as well as new development; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that a relationship exists between new construction and the need to install, upgrade, and replace fire hydrants and other improvements to the fire protec- tion water system to improve fire protection and prevent the spread of fires from building to building; WHEREAS, the City Council finds a direct relationship between new development in all zones of the City and the need for fire system improvements overall; WHEREAS, the City Council finds the purpose of this fee is to finance improvements in fire protection facilities to reduce the impacts of increased density in residential, commercial and man- ufacturing areas brought on by the addition of buildings and the expansion of existing buildings within the city; _ . 4 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the -AiP fire proth ion fees collected pursuant to this interim ordinance shall be used to finance only the public facilities described or identified in Exhibit "Al" attached hereto; WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows: A. After considering the study and analysis prepared by staff and the testimony received at this public hearing, the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Council approves said staff report, and incorporates such herein, and further finds that new development in the City of Hermosa Beach area will generate additional fire protection needs within the city and will contribute to the degradation of fire safety in the city; B. There is a need in the City of Hermosa Beach for addi- tional fire hydrants, hydrant replacements and upgrades in as- sociated facilities which have not been constructed or have been constructed, but new development has not contributed its fair share towards these facility costs and said facilities have been called for in or are consistent with the city's Safety Element of its General Plan; C. The facts and evidence presented establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities and the impacts of the types of development described in paragraph 3 below, for which the corresponding fee is charged, and that there is also a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development for which the fee is charged, as these reasonable relationships or nexus are in more detail described in the staff report referred to above; D. The cost estimates set forth in the staff report are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs; and WHEREAS, the materials in this study were available for public inspection and review fourteen (14) days prior to this public hearing. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Purpose. In order to implement the goals and objec- tives of the Safety Element of the General Plan of the City of Hermosa Beach and to mitigate the fire protection impacts caused by new development in the City of Hermosa Beach, certain public fire protection improvements must be or had to be constructed. The City Council has determined that a development impact fee is needed in order to finance these public improvements and to pay for the development's fair share of the construction costs of these improvements. In establishing the fee described in the following sections, the City Council has found the fee to be con- sistent with its General Plan and, pursuant to Government Code Section 65913.2, has considered the effects of the fee with respect to the city's housing needs as established in the Housing Element of the General Plan. On an annual basis, the City Coun- cil shall review this fee to determine whether the fee amounts are reasonably related to the impacts of developments and whether the described public facilities are still needed. Section 2. Fire Protection Improvement Fee. A Fire Protection Fee is hereby established on issuance of residential building permits for development in the city to pay for the fire protec- tion measures described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto. This development fee shall be paid by each developer prior to issuance of a building permit. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 3. Fee Account. The revenues raised by payment of this fee shall be placed in a separate and special fund and such revenues, along with any interest earnings on that fund, shall be used solely to pay for the city's construction of facilities described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto in the manner specified under Section 7 set out below. Section 4. Fee. (a) Residential Development That Adds Less Than Three Units. For new residential development, the fee shall be equal to fifty cents ($0.50) per square foot for the construction of two or less dwelling units. For a new residential dwelling unit which rep- laces an existing residential dwelling, the fee shall be equal to fifty cents ($0.50) per square foot for the additional square footage of the new dwelling unit. Said square footage shall be calculated by subtracting the square footage of the demolished legally permitted structure from the square footage of the newly constructed dwelling unit. For existing residences that add floor space, the fee shall be equal to fifty cents ($0.50) per square foot of floor space added. Square footage shall be calcu- lated by using the methods found in the most recently approved edition of the Uniform Building Code adopted by the City of Her- mosa Beach. (b) All Other Developments. For residential developments that add three or more units to existing residential density, more than 5,000 sq. ft., or any non-residential development within the city, the development shall be liable for the actual cost of improvement which benefits the project or a fee equal to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 fifty cents ($0.50) per square foot of floor space, whichever is greater. The square footage shall be calculated in the same man- ner as subsection (a). Section 5. Alternative Requirements. For projects of less than three units which received a building permit after July 1, 1987 must provide the fire protection improvements as a condition of approval, said developers may pay the fees established under this ordinance in lieu of providing the improvements required. Section 6. Use of Fee. The fee shall be solely used to pay (1) for the described public facilities to be constructed by the city; (2) for reimbursing the city for the development's fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the city; or (3) for reimbursing other developers who have con- structed public facilities as described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto, where those facilities were beyond that needed to miti- gate the impacts of the other developers' project or projects. Section 7. Notice and Imposition Date. This ordinance was adop- ted at a noticed public hearing, at which time the City Council also considered the associated studies which were available to the general public for a period of at least fourteen (14) days prior to the public hearing. This fee shall apply to the is- suance of any building permit, for any residential development issued 60 days following this ordinance's adoption and for all other types of development 30 days following its adoption. Section 8. Clerk Prepared Synopsis. The City Council shall designate the City Clerk to prepare a summary (synopsis) of this 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ordinance to be published pursuant to Government Code Section 36933(c)(1) in lieu of the full text of said ordinance. Section 9. Publication of Synopsis. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause a synopsis (summary) of this ordinance to be pub • - lished in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circu- lation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. Section 10. Effective Period of Ordinance. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall en- ter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS TH DAY OF , 1988. ATTEST: PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY 7 IXEIBIT NAN FIRE PROTECTION MEASURES SUBJECT TO FIRE PROTECTION FEE 1. HYDRANTS 2. RISER CONNECTIONS FROM MAIN TO HYDRANT 3. NECESSARY VALVES AND ATTACHMENTS AS DETERMINED BY THE WATER COMPANY 4. REPAIRS TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS STREETS AND SIDEWALKS NECESSITATED BY THE INSTALLATION OF HYDRANTS, RISERS AND NECESSARY VALVES AND ATTACHMENTS June 21, 1988 City Council Meeting June 28, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-933 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING LEGALLY INCONSISTENT AND SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE ORDINANCES FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE. Submitted for waiver of further reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 88-933 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of June 14, 1988, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk Concur: evin B. North craft, B. Northcraf , City Manager 2b 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88-933 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING LEGALLY INCONSISTENT AND SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE ORDINANCES FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE. WHEREAS, the Citizens of the City of Hermosa Beach do not benefit from socially uninforceable and legally inconsistent ordinances remaining within the City Code; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach is committed to maintaining a City Code that is currently legally enforceable; WHEREAS, it has been determined that one hundred seven (107) sections and subsections are contained in the City Code that are either inconsistent with state law, the State Constitution, or the mores of contemporary society; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Section 10-5(b) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Making immoral or obscene dancing unlawful is now repealed. Section 2. That Section 10-5(d) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting females under 21 from acting as dance instructors is now repealed. Section 3. That Section 21-8(b) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting massage by the opposite sex is now repealed. Section 4. That Section 31-4 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Requiring taxicab owners and operators to be U.S. citizens or to have declared their intention to become citizens is now repealed. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 5. That Sections 16-1 to 16-36 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Regulation and control of sanitation of Hospitals. Schools and Nurseries is now repealed. Section 6. That Sections 20-2(a) to 20-2(1), 20-2(o) and 20-2(r) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Nuisances are now repealed. Section 7. That Sections 25-1 to 25-13 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Health and Safety regulation of public eating places is now repealed. Section 8. That Section 21-27 and 21-28 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting fleeing from a police officer and furnishing false information to a peace officer is now repealed. Section 9. That Section 21-2 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Forbiding the sale of crime comic books to minors is now repealed. Section 10. That Section 21-4 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting the use of glue and like substances for purposes of intoxication is now repealed. Section 11. That Section 21-15 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Making sexual intercourse among unmarried person unlawful is now repealed. Section 12. That Section 21-16 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting trespassing on posted property is now repealed. Section 13. That Section 21-24 to 21-26 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Littering is now repealed. Section 14. That Section 18-1 to 18-2 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting the sale of firearms to minors and the possession of firearms by minors is now repealed. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 15. That Section 18-4 and 18-5 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Unlawful for parents or guardians to allow or permit minors to violate curfew provisions or other provisions in Chapter 18 is now repealed. Section 16. That Section 18-6 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Misrepresentation of age by minor for the purpose of obtaining alcoholic beverages is now repealed. Section 17. That Section 18-11 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Unlawful for females under 21 to act as dance instructors is now repealed. Section 18. That Section 18-12 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting dance instruction in rooms not visible from main dance floor is now repealed. Section 19. That Sections 26-1 to 26-12 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Felon Registration is now repealed. Section 20. That Section 21-22 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Unlawful to carry certain concealed weapons without permit from Mayor is now repealed. Section 21. That Section 21-1 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Abandoned Refrigerators is now repealed. Section 22. That Section 19-6 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibitinapersons from clinging to moving vehicles is now repealed. Section 23. That Section 19-14 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Vehicles emerging from private property and alleys is now repealed. Section 24. That Sections 19-21 to 19-23 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Accidents and Reports is now repealed. 1 2 3• 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 25. That Section 19-20.1 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - abandoned Vehicles is now repealed. Section 26. That Sections 6-1 to 6-7 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Bicycle Licensing is now repealed. Section 27. That Section 19-31 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Misdemeanor to violate Chapter 19 is now repealed. Section 28. That Section 22-3(j) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting profane or indecent language in parks is now repealed. Section 29. That Section 22-3(0) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Gambling is now repealed. Section 30. That Section 17-50(d) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Gambling is now repealed. Section 31. That Section 5-11(c) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting vulgar, profane language is now repealed. Section 32. That Section 5-11(a) and 5-11(b) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Loud Noises is now repealed. Section 33. That Section 5-20 of the Hermosa Beach City Code Prohibiting intoxicated persons to be on the beaches is now repealed. Section 34. That Section 23-6 and 23-7 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Reporting Requirements of Pawnbrokers is now repealed. Section 35. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty 0O) days of its final passage and adoption. Section 36. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ordinance to be published in the $asy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 37. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO F 32✓ P. LOUGH, ITY A'-•RNEY L16/RPORD June 21, 1988 City Council Meeting June 28, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-934 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATED APRIL 13, 1988 PREPARED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 88-5118 AND APPROVED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 88-5131 OF SAID COUNCIL, AND THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ESTIMATE, DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT CONTAINED IN SAID REPORT; ORDERING CERTAIN CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED AND MAINTAINED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1988. Submitted for waiver of further reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 88-934 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of June 14, 1988, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Concur: Creighton, None None None Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson evin B. Northc City Manager Ka46(6A) t leen Midstokke, City Clerk C 1 1 2 ORDINANCE NO. 88-934 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 4 DATED APRIL 13, 1988 PREPARED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 88-5118 AND APPROVED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 88-5131 OF SAID COUNCIL, 5 AND THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ESTIMATE, DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT CONTAINED IN SAID REPORT; ORDERING CERTAIN CROSSING GUARD 6 MAINTENANCE SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED AND MAINTAINED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1988. 7 HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1988-89 8 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, 9 California, did in Resolution 87-5118 of said Council, pursuant 10 to the provisions of the "Crossing Guard Maintenance District Act 11 of 1974" (Chapter 3.5, Article 2, 3 and 4, Sections 55530 through 12 55570, of the Government Code of the State of California), 13 require the Director of Public Works of said City to make and 14 file with the Clerk of the City Council a report in writing, Io presenting certain matters relating to the proposed Crossing 16 Guard Maintenance District No. 1988-1989, as contemplated under 17 the provisions of said Act; and 18 WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works, pursuant to the 19 requirements of said City Council as expressed in. Resolution No. 20 87-5118 and did on the 13th day of April, 1988 , file in the 21 office of the City Clerk (who'is ex -officio Clerk of the City 22 Council) of said City, his report in writing responsive to the 23 requirements of said Resolution No. 88-5118 and as contemplated 24 under the provisions of said Act; and 25 WHEREAS, the said City Council did in Resolution No. 89-5131 26 approve said report on the 26th day of April, 1988, in conformity 27 with the provisions of said Act; and 28 1 2 3 4 5 •6 i 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, said City Council did thereafter and on said 26th day of April, 1988, pass its Resolution of Intention No. 88-5132 declaring its intention to order certain Crossing Guard Maintenance Services for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1988; and WHEREAS, Said City Council did on said 26th day of April, 1988, in its Resolution No. 88-5132 fix and designate Tuesday, the 14th day of June, 1988, at the hour of 8:00 p.m. of said day as the time for hearing protests in reference to the proposed maintenance and assessment, at the Council Chamber, in the City Hall, Civic Center, in the City of Hermosa Beach, California; and WHEREAS, at the time and place above stated for hearing protests in reference to the proposed maintenance and assessment, certain written and oral protests and objections were filed and presented, which said protests and objections were fully and regularly heard and considered by said Council; and WHEREAS, said City Council being fully advised in the premises, does hereby proceed as follows: NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, FIND, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That said Council does hereby deny all protests and objections and does hereby approve, confirm and adopt the said report of said Director of Public Works dated the 13th day of April, 1988, and does hereby approve and confirm the assessment proposed for said proposed maintenance as set forth and referred to in said report, which said report is now on file • 1 in the office of the City Clerk of said City, open to inspection, 2 hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and said City Council 3 does hereby also confirm and adopt the respective instruments struments therein contained and designated therein as SPECIFICATIONS, 5 DIAGRAM AND PLAN NO. 1988-1989, Estimate of Costs and Assessment, 6 all of which, on file as aforesaid, are herebyincorporated porated i herein and made a part hereof. 8 SECTION 2. That said Council does herebyorder the said 9 contemplated maintenance to be made in accordance with the said 10 PLAN and SPECIFICATIONS therefor, so adopted and approved, pp oved, and 11 does hereby order and determine that. the fiscalyear 12referred to in said Resolution of Intention No.88-5132 shall be and the same 13 is hereby fixed and established as the period commencing on the 14 1st day of July, 19.88, and ending on the 30th dayof June, 1989 15 both dates inclusive, as therein set forth; and said Council does 16 hereby levy the said proposed total assessment made to cover the 17 costs and expenses of said improvement upon the respective 18 p ctive several subdivisions of land in the assessment district described 19 in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-5132 and as fixed and 20 determined by said report, 'dated Apri113, 1988, and the proposed 21 assessment, filed therewith, as aforesaid, in the office of the 22 City Clerk of said City, for the fiscalear beginning Y g ing July 1, 23 1988 and ending June 30, 1989 both dates inclusive. e• SECTION 3. That the City Council hereby orders and directs 25 the City Treasurer to establish a special fund ' 26 en titled, "Hermosa Beach Crossing Guard Maintenance District No.1988-1989 Fund"; 27 and who shall place into said Fund alla ments o P Y f assessments 28 June 20, 1988 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL June 28, 1988 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #18853 (C.U.P. CON NO. 87-11) LOCATION: 1550 LOMA DRIVE APPLICANT: JEROME OLGUIN, RALPH RUTHERFORD, KEVIN C. & KIMBERLIE R. MCTAVISH REQUEST: APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP FOR 4 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #18853 which is consistent with the approved Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map #18853 at their October 6, 1987 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. Michael Schubach Planning Director die7?—:;47.7 evin B. North raft City Manager T/srfinmap R bmitted, An e ea Associate Planner 2d 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #18853 FOR A FOUR -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1550 LOMA DRIVE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on June 28, 1988 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, •together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any • specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of 'Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 87-56, adop- ted after public hearing on October 6, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #18853 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 9 and a portion of Lot 40, Hiss Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract, as recorded in Book 4, Page 19 of - 1 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles, for a four -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 1550 Loma Drive, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermo- sa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: T/rsfinmap CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON, Director CECIL E. BUGH, Chief Deputy Director MAS NAGAMI, Assistant Director June 6, 1988 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone: (818) 458-5100 The City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O. BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA. CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE: L4 850.18 Dear Council Members: PARCEL MAP N0. 18853 The subject map has been checked by the City Engineer and is ready for your approval. IT IS RECOM1ENDED THAT YOLR COUVCIL: 1. Approve the map. 2. Make findings as follows: a. That this project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1 and 66474.6 of the Subdivision.Map Act. b. That the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvereit, is consistent with the general plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code. 3. Instruct the City Clerk to endorse on the face of the map of Parcel Map No. 18853 the certificate which embodies'the approval of said map. Please return the signed original tracing to the Subdivision Section, Land Development Division, Department of Public Works, for processing and filing with the Registrar/Recorder of the County of Los Angeles. Very truly yours, T. A. TIDEMANSON City Engineer Roger W. Burger lteE-Deputy City Engineer MGR:kc Attachments cc: City Clerk Director of Public Works 30 North Raymond Avenue Suite 708 Pasadena, Calif. 91103-3930 James P. Lough Attorney at Law June 14, 1988 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Telephone (818) 792-4728 (818) 792-4776 MEMORANDUM REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: JAMES P. LOUGH, City Attorney Linda LeVanway, Paralegal RE: Amendment to City Code Section 1-7.3 Citation Procedure RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached ordinance amending Section 1-7.3. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Book Publishing Company's report on the Hermosa Beach City Code and review by this office, the Council has concured that there are several ordinances contained in the City Code that need to be amended. Section 1-7.3 provides that on receipt of an arrest citation, unless waived by the person, the time specified in the notice to appear must be within 5 days. Penal Code 853.6 (b) conflicts with this ordinance because as it requires: "Unless waived by the person, the time specified in the notice to appear must be at least 10 days after the arrest if the duplicate notice is to be filed by the officer with the magistrate." CONCLUSION: This office advises the City Council to approve the attached ordinance amending Section 1-7.3 of the Hermosa Beach City Code to conform with Penal Code section 853.6. Respectfully mitted, �S P. LOUGH, C ty A TY OF HERMOSAEACH L17/ORDAD1 rney e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE ATTACHED TEXT AMENDMENT TO HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE SECTION 1-7.3 'NOTICE TO APPEAR -TIME' WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach desires to bring the Hermosa Beach City Code up to date with current statutory provisions; WHEREAS, Section 1-7.3 of the Hermosa Beach City Code provides that a person must appear before the court with jurisdiction or before an officer authorized to receive deposit or bail at least 5 days after an arrest for a violation of the City Code; WHEREAS, Section 1-7.3 conflicts with California Penal Code section 853.6, providing that a person appear before the court of jurisdiction or before an officer authorized to recieve deposit or bail at least 10 days following an arrest; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Chapter 1, (General Provisions), Section 1-7.3 of said City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 1-7.3. NOTICES TO APPEAR - TIME. The time specified in the notice to appear shall be at least ten (10) days after such arrest. /1 /1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 2. Effective Date. That this ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption. Section 3. Publication. Prior to the expiration of Fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city; shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 1988. ATTEST: CITY CLERK PROVED AS ORM: Y ATTORNEY PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA June 21, 1988 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH M E_ MyQ_ R .A. 8 D__U M REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 1988 TO: The Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney Linda LeVanway, Paralegal RE: Resolution to Recycle Tape Recording City Council Meetings RECQM,E4(DATIQN; It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution entitled "A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE RECYCLING OF TAPES USED TO RECORD THE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 180 DAYS (6 MONTHS) AFTER THE OCCURENCE OF THE EVENT RECORDED". QACORQUN_Q: This office was asked to research how the City may recycle the video and audio tape used to record Council meetings. The City tapes the Council meetings, then the minutes are prepared by the City Clerk's office. Since the meeting is then Offically recorded, the tape is no longer needed. Retention of these tapes instead of recycling them has added an extra cost in always having to buy new tapes. Also, there is not sufficent storage space to store all these tapes. Therefore, the City should adopt a policy by which these tapes may be recycled. d8A�1$JS;. Government Code section 34090 et seq. provides for estruction of public records. Since the tapes the City wishes to recycle are duplicates of city records less than five years old, section 34090.7 is most applicable. It reads: "...the legislative body of a city may prescribe a procedure under which duplicates of city records less than five years old may be destroyed if they are no longer required." "For purposes of this section, yi4eo.recording„mediums,, such, ss, videotapes,_ and film shall -be cpnsidered dupli9ate._reeords_.if the_„city,Aee s anoth _,reGQrd., s 0, -s writ -n min tes or an au i a•e_reco d e _ g_yent w ch 1,3- recorded in the yj, . eo. me. ium, However, l ,video,_ree9rdirlg,.mgdium_ shall_ not.be de3tr9yed_or. grasea _pursuant.,to„ this., seetipn__fpr .. a period.of at,. least 90 c�ays..af'ter Qecgrren., ceof,.,the gvent , recordgcf, thgreon.'! `2 f REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 1988 TO: The Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney Linda LeVanway, Paralegal RE: Resolution to Recycle Tape Recording City Council Meetings The last Council action on this subject was taken in 1981. At that time Council established a procedure for duplicating tapes upon public request for copies and set policy where the City could charge a specified amount for the duplicates. Also, Council set a policy to retain the tapes for six months, with the exception of those matters determined by the City Attorney/City Council to be retained. Since 1985, all tapes have been retained by this office's request. ONCUL$IQt; For the reasons listed above, this office recommends that the Council approve the attached resolution providing that audio or video tapes may be recycled 180 days (6 months) after the occurance of the event recorded unless expressly ordered to be retained by the City Council or City Attorney. CONCUR: Kil E N 1 OKKE, City Clerk Respectively submitted, . LOUGH, At or NOTED: KEVIN B. NORTHCRAFT, City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 88— A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE RECYCLING OF TAPES USED TO RECORD THE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 180 DAYS (6 MONTHS) AFTER THE OCCURRENCE OF THE EVENT RECORDED. WHEREAS, Government Code section 34090.7 provides that a city may prescribe a procedure under which duplicates of city records less than five years Old may be destroyed if they are no longer required; WHEREAS, the audio and video tape recordings of City Council meetings are considered duplicate records in that the proceedings are additionally recorded in Offieal minutes; WHEREAS, the retention of these tapes creates a storage problem and is also costly to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby direct the City Clerk to recycle the audio and vide° tape recordings Of the City Council meetings 180 days (6 months) after the oecurence of the event recorded, with the exception of those matters determined by the City Attorney and/or City Council to be retained. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of June, 1988. PR S D NT of t e City COune l and MAYOR of the City Of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: BACKGROUND MATERIALS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: SEPT. 25, 1987 FROM: CITY CLERK MIDSTOKKE RE: RETENTION OF TAPES CITY COUNCIL MTGS. Attached is a copy of the last council action regarding the retention of tapes of City Council Meetings. However, since you have been the City Attorney, I have retained all of the tapes at your request. I am requesting that you reconsider and allow for the recycling after six months as allowed in the Government Code. The tape could be kept indefinitely if matters of litigation or potential litigation are discussed. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. 4/6-00 RECOMMENDATION REGARDING RETENTION OF TAPES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS. Memorandum dated April 22, 1981 from Charlotte Malone,. City Clerk. In reviewing subject matter, Councilmembers questioned the City Attorney as to the proposed recommendation to which he responded that he was in concurrence with same. Coming forward to speak on this matter was Wilma Burt, 1152 7th St., who commented that she was in favor of retaining tapes for one year. ACTION - that the policy of the City Council is that tapes are to be retained for six months with the exception of those matters determined by the City Attorney/City Council to be retained; and that staff present a proposed resolution to recover costs for copies of tapes. Motion by Mayor Widman, seconded by Schmeltzer Ayes: Barks, Sehmeltzer, Tyson, Mayor Widman Noes: None Absent: MacFaden RECOMMENDATION TO LEVY ASSESSMENT FOR 1981-82 - PARKING AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. Memorandum dated April 24, 1981 from Gregory T. Meyer, City Manager. (Additional Item - post agenda). Mr. Meyer, City Manager, referenced a request by the PAID Commission that the Council set a levy of $5.00 per month/Business Licensee with- in the district. Mr. Meyer recommended that, as a matter of policy, the District levy be treated in the same manner as business licenses, meaning that there would be no refunds nor pro -rations allowed. During Council discussion a member suggested that before action was taken that there be full notice and public hearings. Rosemary Foreman, Staff Liaison, responded by noting that full public had been conducted at the Council level and that downtownbusinessngs meetings were held in which all interested parties were notified. Also heard speaking on this item were Gary Hichlmeier. and Perry Dell. ACTION - to accept recommendation of the Parking and Business Improvement District Commission, as outlined in memorandum dated April 24, 1981. Motion by Mayor Widman, seconded by Tyson Ayes: Schmeltzer, Tyson, Mayor Widman Noes: Barks Absent: MacFaden Carried. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE MEETING WITH HERMOSA SCHOOL BOARD. Memorandum dated April 24, 1981 from City Manager. Gregory Meyer, City Manager, referenced a request from the Hermosa School Board regarding a sub -committee meeting to discuss the possible impact on the "Safe Route to School" plan as a result of the Council's actions implementing modification to the traffic circulation in the north quadrant. ACTION - that the City Manager arrange a mutually convenient time (Mav K. 1QR1 at 7 • qn ., m N Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council APRIL 22, 1981 City Council Meeting of April 28, 1981 RETENTION OF TAPES OF COUNCIL MEETINGS Request to set Policy Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt a policy that tape recordings of,Council meetings: 1. Be recycled as the minutes are approved by Council, with the exception of those matters determined by the city attorney to be retained. Background Since January 23, 1979 the Council meetings have been recorded at a cost per meeting of aproximately $7.50 ($2.50 per tape). Lack of sufficient storage space would seem to indicate that a retention policy be set. A telephone survey of local cities and information from the League of California Cities reveals that: Manhattan Beach - Recycles after minutes are approved El Segundo - Recycles after two years Redondo Beach - Recycles after 15-18 months Seal Beach - Recycles after minutes are approved Garden Grove - Recycles after one year Cities which have adopted Policy 1 regard the tapes solely as an aid in preparation of minutes, with the exception of those matters deemed by the city attorney to be retained. While staff is recommending Policy 1, other options available to you are: 1) Tapes be retained for a specified period of years (1 to 10), with the exception of those matters de- termined by the city attorney to be retained. 2) Tapes be retained indefinitely Concur: Gre_or T 'eyer Ci Manager &TteMalone, City Clerk 4-28-81 Council Action: that policy be to retain tapes for 6 months, with ex- ception of those matters determined by the City Attorney to be retained; and to set up resolution to recover costs for copies of tapes. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 201 211 22 ATTEST: RESOLUTION NO. 82-4515 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR PROVIDING DUPLICATE TAPES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that a number of requests have been made for providing duplicate tapes of City Council meetings and various City Commission meetings; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that considerable time is spent by City staff in providing appropriate tapes or segments of tapes requested by the public. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That there is hereby established a fee for providing duplicate tapes of City Council and/or City Commission meetings, based on the fee analysis prepared by the Building Department, attached hereto as "Exhibit A". Total for one side of tape Total for both sides of tape $20.00 $28.00 SECTION 2. That this resolution shall take effect on the day of its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 6th day of April, $RESIDENT ofe�City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California 23 CITY CLERK 24 25 26 27 28 29 1 APPROVED AS TO FO /fa& CITY ATTORNEY March 29, 1982 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of April 6, 1982 PROPOSED FEE RESOLUTION COPIES OF DUPLICATE TAPES Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached fee resolution allowing the City Clerk's office to charge a fee for providing duplicate tapes of City Council meetings and/or City Commission meetings. Background The City Clerk's office has found that there has been an increasing demand for copies of tapes of City Council meetings, some of which date back three or more months. Also, from time to time requests are made for City Commission meetings. As considerable time is spent in providing the public with tapes, along with assistance in allowing citizens to use City Hall facilities to record from original tapes, it is staff's feeling that a fee should be established. Your attention is called to the following policy decision acted upon at your meeting of April 28, 1981: "That the policy of the City Council is that tapes are to be retained for six months with the exception of those matters determined by the City Attorney/City Council to be retained; and that staff present a proposed fee resolution to recover costs for copies of tapes." Analysis An assessment of time spent in providing duplicate tapes has been prepared by the Building Department which accurately reflect costs associated with preparation of tapes (Exhibit A attached). As an alternative to the recommended fee, you may wish to modify the amount proposed. Concur: Gr oe tu-i T rgy lT. 'Meyer City Manager C rlotte Malone City Clerk COST AAVAL9,S,e FOR FROkW/NG rPil IE f rc D-7,L� % 1p as a ��� • 2J" : //40 2 '5. 'I11MI ,IIIIII�C ■MIEN 11111111N jMINIM11111111■ num .Ennis Immo minus Air J 11mi7.44iililil . ■ INH' 1111111 110111111 1111111N �-- 'AIFFAffilf /14 mum 111■ 11111111 rr • IiEllllille 11111111111 111m1111i111111■ MUM ■11m1aa111111■ of ma=' . irrimimminommiumino 111.'111111■ inmo 111111o� r m� ' - 1111111111 11.111111 ■ 11111Iv11111 ■� 11E1_11111111 1111111111111111111 111111RR111i11■ 11E11 11111111 111111111111111111 14, 4 d e•s it - /Y. �■ 1■ rill I li�ia,rilllll� txf .. •V 1111111111111111 111111111111111111 ... .�. 1mo. e June 23, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 28, 1988 SUPPORT FOR PROMPT ELECTION ON PROPOSED CITY OF MALIBU INCORPORATION Recommendation: That the City Council approve the attached resolution supporting a prompt election on the question of incorporation of the pro- posed City of Malibu, California. Background: The attached letter, dated June 11, 1988, was received from the incorporation committee of the proposed city of Malibu. Mayor Simpson has asked that the Council consider support for the com- mittee's efforts as requested. Analysis: The letter requests our City's support of a prompt election and urges the County to rescind it's concern regarding completion of an assessment district for sewer improvements. Urging of a prompt election seems appropriate given the progress that has been made to date towards incorporation. The sewer assessment district question appears to be more a matter between the resi- dents, the incorporation committee, and the County. Accordingly, the resolution suggested by the incorporation committee has been revised to reflect our support for a prompt election as a gesture of cooperation with the residents of Malibu and possibly a future fellow municipality within our County. 4e?fL ev n B. Norther, ft City Manager KBN/ld RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING A PROMPT ELECTION ON THE QUESTION OF INCORPORATION OF THE PROPOSED CITY OF MALIBU, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, there is proposed the incorporation of the City of Malibu in Los Angeles County; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County has requested the Local Agency Formation Commission to condition the incorporation of the City of Malibu on the right of the County to retain jurisdiction as long as necessary to complete assessment district projects within the city; and WHEREAS, such a condition is not authorized by state law; and WHEREAS, the County should not delay incorporation until this condition is exacted; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby expresses its support for a prompt election to be held on the question of the incorporation of the proposed City of Malibu, California. SECTION 2. The City Council further urges LAFCO to approve the holding of the election without the condition allowing the /1 1/ /1 1/ /1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 County of Los Angeles to conduct assessment proceedings within the city after incorporation. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of June, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 4984 South Encinal Canyon Road Malibu, California 90265 (213) 457-7086 (213) 457-7397 June 11, 1988 Mayor Etta Simpson City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 Deer Mrs. Simpson: The purpose of this letter is to request that your City Council direct to the Board of Supervisors a resolution of support for the residents of Malibu to have an opportunity to vote on cltyhood In November, free of conditions intruding upon traditional municipal affairs. You may have read of our effort to bring the Malibu Cityhood issue to a vote in November. We received a favorable staff recommendation indicating financial viability, followed by a 6 - 1 approval of the Local Agency Formation Commission on May 25. The hearing has been closed but continued to July 13 at which time LAFC0 will hear requests for reconsideration. One request is from the LA County Board of Supervisors to condition the approval by giving the County juris- diction for as long as necessary to complete assessment district projects commenced prior to the date of incorporation. At the Bd of Supervisors hearing, discussion of the motion made it clear that the intent was to permit the County to process a sewer improvement district in Malibu which they are pursuing based on a contested alleged health hazard which allows them to impose the assessment district without a vote of the people. It is our opinion that the County has no more authority to do this than to continue to administer city zoning after incorporation. It would also seem to erode the powers of cities, and would establish a very detrimental precedent. A ballot measure encumbered with such a condition would be very confusing to the voter. This request to condition our LAFCO approval is supported by our Supervisor, Deane Dana The Bord of Supervisors must act by August 9 to set a November election. Statute allows them delays beyond this date. We need your city to encourage them to act in a timely manner. I'm sure you are aware of the benefits to a new city of incorporating early in a fiscal year. In our case, they also include continued California Highway Patrol service on our major street, Pacific Coast Highway, until June 30 - a significant financial savings to the City. A draft resolution is attached. We will of course be grateful for any form that your assistance may take. It would be helpful if you would send a copy to us and to LAFCO, 383 Hall of Administration, 500 W. Temple, St. Los Angeles, Ca. 90012. We will appreciate your consideration of our request. Very truly yours, lr��' June 21, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council June 28, 1988 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 87-8 -- REZONE AREA 7 FROM R-2 TO R-1 INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends that all of area 7 be rezoned to R -2B. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the rezoning of area 7 to Single Family Residential, R-1 zone. Background The Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 17, 1988 and adopted Resolution P.C. 88-45 which recommends rezoning the area to R -2B. Analysis The Planning Commission's 4-1 vote to rezone this area to R -2B was based on lower density that would occur when the maximum of two units per lot in the R -2B is imposed, and also the large size lots that exist, which could accommodate two units under the R -2B zoning. A 27% reduction in potential density would result if the area were changed from R-2 to R -2B. Under R-1, a potential reduction in density of 73% would result. However, the number of existing lots with two units equals 21, and the number of existing units on these lots equals 42. Considering that these existing units will remain, a more realistic reduction in density is 51% if the entire area is rezoned to R-1 as recommended by the staff. If the alternative as noted in the attached staff report is adopted which would rezone the area east of Prospect to R -2B and rezone the area west of Prospect to R-1, a realistic reduction of 21% and 42% respectively would result, and an overall reduction for the entire subject area of 29% would result. Attachments 1. Proposed ordinance (based on staff's recommendation, also includes "Grandfather Clause") 2. Staff report dated May 12, 1988 1 3. Planning Commission 88-45 4. Planning Commmission minutes dated May 17, 1988 5. Affidavit for public notice 6. Public Correspondence CONCUR: Respectfully sibm ted, Michael Scbu ach ! Planning Director Kevin B. Northgra ft City Manager T/ccsrzon7 1 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. -WHEREA$, the City Council held a public hearing on June 28, 1988 and made the following Findings: A. The State law requires consistency between the zoning and the General Plan; B. Rezoning the subject •properties as indicated on the attached maps will result in consistency between the zoning and n=rat Plan• NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the Zoning Map shall be amended as shown on the attached maps and legally de cribed as follows: X-G Aft 1. Rezone area 7 from R -2,R . too—t, legally described as follows. - Lots 1-4 inclusive of the Johnson. and Newman's Camino Real Tract. - Lots 2 -22 -inclusive of the J. M. Floores Subdivision. - Lots 1-4 inclusive, 17-22 inclusive, portions of 15 & 16, Lots 6-13 inclusive and 24-27 inclusive of the Angela Heights Tract. - Lots 1-8 indlusive of Tract 21785. 2. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a completed building permit package on file with the City prior to June 28, 1988. Said package must include a completed building permit application form, completed conceptual plan (plot plan, floor plans, elevation plans and similar plans) and a lot survey. Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a diligent manner and must be issued a building permit within six months of the effective date of this ordinance. 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. -� - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: T/ccorzon7 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY AREA 7 OVERVIEW c Rezone from Two Family Residential (R-2) to Single Family Residential (R-1) (numbered areas correspond to detail maps) N AREA 7 Detail Map 1 • IBTH ST . 4 de OS 5 6i 0 7 jO4 £ 44'ie o399 3 973/ 2,6801 a' ' A 4570/" ti O 8 .01 9 • • W J7 17TH ST.;) 1 nr1 5T. fie N 1 L.- 17TH AREA 7 Detail Map 2 cc ST• • i 0 so • k...,a • _• A• .11 s"� . �.. O p 0 O O O O • 11 22 ` • 21 •20 19 • 18 h " 17 16 .. 15 14 13 1 so •s . l, 112 • pees ti ao TrI • o I7 TH 4e......,,69.475 �,I 4550 '1 av65 44 % ••;I • 490 ' t • Ai W I /ef/ !b AREA 7 ' Detail Map 3 'B! •Alw ?o. %. 3��7r.! o /yam ti /e. tii3 % ��. h O o 4/.50 I / /94.60 e0 sr.?", 15 N, "04 J1 41620 /50.n Ni O 17 . f07e'' • 2 ti 49501°' 'Ave At O44401•' Ale /JO 8 0 18 /10 1 ST. 7, 10 4 ' 70.65 0 b 474101°' 22 Yo, sa.s6� b 45001 y .(TI % • &o.,/ 1 ' 796// Z , /t/g9.99e /10•/2 •..e i w owe O 20 to NO D es m 19 40 e1 N • A;744.0 Z//oo• 9.0 ' 7are8 O /6394 S .75ped7 '41W7/%7%y. /66.0/ 7y6 dd4/ h O 14x/i..° 65. / .97 AREA 7 Detail Map 4 /58/7 ' G,d70so• • /5629 ® w O 12 4z..vr.• "58.2.5 11 49cbro• /5Q66 0 13 4;e0"• /50.96 40 kh %4 RV"' o r• iq,�2!/iP m • t •/44sz201<5., mINNIO 9 reathgritutth glatrr-tats Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission May 12, 1988 Regular Meeting of May 17, 1988 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 87-8 -- REZONE AREA 7 FROM R-2 TO R-1 INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation Staff recommends rezoning area 7 from R-2 to R-1. Background According to the City Council schedule of zone changes, the subject area should be considered at this time. Analysis Staff has considered area 7 as one area, instead of separating it into sub -areas like area 9 and area 2. There were no areas within area 7 which could be considered distinctively different except for the factor that east of Prospect Avenue, a larger percentage of lots have 2 units; this factor is discussed later. The following describes the subject area: Total Land Area: 270,593 sq. ft. Total No. of Lots: 51 Current No. of Dwelling Units: 71 Average No. of Units per Lot: 1.39 Existing Density: 11.43 Units per Acre Existing Zoning: R-2 General Plan Designation: Low Density Potential No. of Units under Current R-2 Zoning Ordinance (1,750 sq. ft. per Unit): 135 Potential No. of Units under Previous R-2 Zoning Ordinance (2 Unit Maximum): 98 Potential No. of Units under Proposed R-1 Zone Change (1 Unit per Lot) : - /0 - 51 No. of Lots with Nonconforming Units under Current R-2 Allowable Density: 0 No. of Lots with Nonconforming Units under Current R-1 Ordinance: 21 No. of Units Constructed in the Last 10 Years: 9 No. of Units Constructed 10 to 20 Years Ago: 16 No. of Units Constructed 20 to 30 Years Ago: 7 No. of Units over 30 Years: 39 Historical Factor: a. 1922 Land Use Map: R-1 b. 1930 Land Use Map: R-2 c. 1943 Land Use Map: R-2 d. 1956 Zoning Map: R-2 e. 1978 Zoning Map: R-2 Lot Size Breakdown: a. No. of Lots below 3,500 sq. ft.: 2 b. No. of Lots over 3,500 sq. ft.: 15 c. No. of Lots over 5,250 sq. ft.: 29 d. No. of Lots over 7,000 sq. ft.: 5 According to the General Plan, the subject area should be rezoned to R-1, and the rezoning would be in accord with advisory measure EE. Fifty-nine percent of the total area is single family dwelling units, and except for one lot with 4 units, the other 41% of the lots have only 2 units. The majority of lots with two units are on the east side of Prospect Avenue; 49% of those lots have 2 units. Only 30% of the lots west of Prospect Avenue have 2 units. Because the majority of the lots with 2 units are east of Prospect Avenue, staff's alternative recommendation would be to rezone this area R-2B.Staff believes this area is large enough to stand on its own and not be considered "spot zoned" if it were to be rezoned R -2B. - 11 - Overall, staff can not find any other reasons that area 7 should be spared from rezoning. It does not possess enough distinguishing features which makes it significantly different from other areas that have been rezoned. Based on the number of existing single family dwellings and the general age of the existing structures, this area bas a good potential for rezoning to R-1. T/pcsrzon7 Michael Schubach Planning Director 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 RESOLUTION P.C. 88-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND RECOMMENDING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 17, 1988 and made the following Findings: A. The lots in the subject area are of sufficient size to be zoned R -2B; B. Rezoning the subject properties to R -2B will result in a density reduction; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby recommend that the Zoning Map shall be amended as shown on the attached maps and legally described as follows: 1. Rezone area 7 from R-2 to R -2B, legally described as follows: - Lots 1-4 inclusive of the Johnson and Newman's Camino Real Tract. • Lots 2-22 inclusive of the J. M. Floores Subdivision. • - Lots 1-4 inclusive, 17-22 inclusive, portions of 15 & 16, Lots 6-13 inclusive and 24-27 inclusive of the Angela Heights Tract. - Lots 1-8 inclusive of Tract 21785. VOTE: AYES: Comms.DeBellis,Ingell,Chmn.Compton NOES: Comm.Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm.Rue I her true C a mis egu CERTIFICATION tify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 88-45 is a plete record of the action taken by the Planning of the City of Hermosa Beach, Cal fornia �4 their meetin_ • 7, 1988. er • Compton, C airman 28 to T/perszon7 • -13— Mic ae Sc u , Secretary ,a?6r:i,,+.:.., f" REZONE OF AREA 7 FROM R-2 TO R-1 OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated May 12, 1988. According to the City Council schedule for zone changes, Area 7 should be considered at this time. He displayed a map of Area 7 on the overhead projector while presenting the staff report. Staff has considered Area 7 as one area instead of separating it into sub -areas as was done in Areas 9 and 2. There were no areas within Area 7 which could be considered distinctly different, except for the fact that east of Prospect Avenue, there is a large percentage of lots having two units. Area 7 has a total land area of 338,753 square feet. There are 73 lots, with a current number of 91 dwelling units. The average number of units per lot is 1.25 with an existing density of 11.70 units per acre. The existing zoning for Area 7 is R-2, with a general plan designation of low density. Under the current R-2 zoning ordinance, there are a potential of 162 units (using 1,750 square feet per unit). Under the previous R-2 zoning ordinance, there were a potential 146 units, with a two unit maximum. There is a potential number of 73 units under the proposed R-1 zone change, with one unit per lot. There are no lots with nonconforming units under the current R-2 allowable density; there are 20 lots with nonconforming units under the current R-1 ordinance. Ten units in Area 7 were constructed within the last 10 years; 15 units were constructed 10 to 20 years ago; 8 units were built 20 to 30 years ago; and 58 units are over 30 years old. The 1922 land use map designation for Area 7 was R-1; 1930 and 1943 land use map designations were R-2. The 1956 and 1978 zoning map designations were both R-2. There are 19 lots in Area 7 under 3500 square feet; 23 lots over 3500 sgiare feet; 26 lots over 5250 square feet; and 5 lots larger than 7000 square feet. P.C. Minutes 5/17/88 l® , According to the general plan, the subject area should be rezoned to R-1, and the rezoning would be in accord with advisory measure EE passed in 1980. Seventy-three percent of the total area is single-family dwelling units, and with the exception of one lot with four units, the other 27 percent of the lots have only two units. The majority of lots with two units are on the east side of Prospect Avenue; 48 percent of those lots have two units. Only 17 percent of the lots west of Prospect Avenue have two units. Because the majority of the lots with two units are east of Prospect Avenue, staff provided an alternative recommendation, which would be to rezone this area to R -2B. Staff believes this area is large enough to stand on its own and not be considered "spot zoning" if it were to be rezoned R -2B. Overall, staff could find no other reasons that Area 7 should be spared from rezoning. It does not possess features which make it different from other areas slated for rezoning. Based on the number of existing single-family dwellings and the general age of the existing structures, this area has a good potential for rezoning to R-1. Comm. Peirce discussed the zoning map and asked about lots in the area already zoned R-1. Mr. Schubach stated that some of the lots between 18th Street and Prospect are zoned R-1. Those lots would not have been noticed. Chmn. Compton asked Mr. Lough to explain what would happen to condominiums in this area if the zoning were changed to R-1. • Mr. Lough discussed the present state of the law, explaining that the condominiums could probably be rebuilt because condos are considered to be separate, legally constituted entities. He noted, however, that this could change in the future. Comm. Ingell asked the Planning Director to explain to the audience why this issue is before the Planning Commission. Mr. Schubach explained that the general plan was adopted in 1979. Since that time, the City has gradually attempted to make the zoning consistent with the general plan. Area 7 is currently shown as a low density area on the general plan; therefore, to be consistent, the area should be rezoned to R-1, low density. The City Council directed staff to schedule hearings for the proposed rezonings, and the areas are being addressed one per month until completed, which could be the end of this year. Public Hearing opened at 8:10 P.M. by Chmn. Compton. Lowell Sterritt, 1619 Golden Avenue, Hermosa Beach, between Prospect and 17th Street on one side and 16th Street on the other side. He brought the property as R-2 in 1954 and has paid taxes for .years on the R-2 zoning. He has no intention of ever building another unit on his property. He opposed the proposed downzoning, stating that he felt it would devalue his property. He stated that it might become necessary to sell his property in the future, and R-2 would be worth more than R-1. He concluded by stating he has lived on this property since he purchased it 34 years ago. °--15- P.C. Minutes 5/17/88 • Richard Holmes, Lot 7 17th Street, Hermosa Beach, which is 40 feet by 140 feet. He considered the lots on 17th Street to be large enough to accommodate two units and still meet the open space requirements. He has over 5600 square feet. If the property is rezoned to R-1, he felt that the property value would be lowered, and that he would not be able to refinance the property. Further, he felt he would not be able to sell the property already there, which is R-2, because the unit would be nonconforming and no bank would want to give a loan on a nonconforming building. He suggested that the Planning Commission recommend that the property remain R-2; otherwise, there could be a lawsuit from him. He stated that he has lived at the property for over ten years. Wayne Durrell, 1737 Prospect Avenue, Hermosa Beach, Lots 1 and 2, which are R-2 and registered as two separate lots even though there is only one dwelling unit. The property was purchased by his grandmother in 1940, and he took it over in 1983 when she died. He planned to tear down the one old structure and build two new units. This will not be possible if the zoning is changed to R-1. Chmn. Compton explained that Mr. Durrell would still be able to build two units so long as the current unit does not straddle the property line and it was merged. If there are two legally constituted lots, a unit could be built on each lot if the lots are large enough. Mr. Schubach stated that if Mr. Durrell has not already received a merge notice, chances are the lots will not be merged; however, he suggested that the Durrells contact the Planning Department for further information. Kathleen Berlin, owner of 1010 17th Street and 1030 8th Place, Hermosa Beach, vehemently opposed the proposed downzone. As she stated in her letter to the Planning Commission, she had intended to tear down the older unit and rebuild two new units as retirement nears. The property was purchased specifically for that purpose. She stated that her lot on 17th Street, as well as others west of Prospect, are very unique because of their large size of 40 feet by 140.15 feet, with the exception of the lot on Prospect. Leland Ferro, speaking on behalf of his mother Violet Ferro, who owns Lot 10 of Angeles Heights Tract, which fronts on Golden Avenue and abuts the school grounds. He stated that he lives 400 miles away and knew nothing of this proposal until ten days ago when he received something in the mail. Mr. Ferro noted that he got out of a sick bed in order to attend this meeting. If he could not continue his testimony at the hearing because,of illness, he requested the right to speak at a later time. Mr. Ferro opposed the proposed downzoning stating that it would adversely impact the property value. He continued by discussing what has historically happened in the area. Mr. Ferro stated that his mother is 87 years old, and the home in question is her family home. The property would have been sold before and developed as an R-2 property; but in deference to his mother, the property has remained in the family because of sentimental value. The income derived from this property helps his mother live comfortably and independently. Mr. Ferro stated that he has not had adequate time to study this issue fully in order to determine how much income would be lost as a result of zoning from R-2 to R-1.. He noted that taxes have been paid on this property for years based on the R-2 zoning. He _ stated that between $50,000 and $100,000 could be lost as a result of the proposed • downzoning. P.C. Minutes 5/17/88 c Mr. Ferro stated that this property has been zoned R-2 for the entire 55 years it has been in his family. His mother may want to sell this property at some time in the future if it becomes necessary to have the income due to failing health and the high cost of health care. Mr. Ferro stated that, if necessary, he will submit further findings in writing in the event this matter goes to a court case. Chmn. Compton noted that the Planning Commission is merely an advisory body to the City Council. He suggested that comments be submitted in writing to the City Council. Mr. Ferro stressed that he was requesting the Planning Commission to recommend to the City Council that the area be left as R-2. Rich Hergenrather, 846 18th Street, Hermosa Beach, asked for clarification of the area to be rezoned. Mr. Schubach stated that Mr. Hergenrather is not located in Area 7; therefore, his property is not subject to the proposed rezone. He continued by pointing out Area 7 on the map. Bill Gray, 1115 17th Street, Hermosa Beach, stated that he owns the following properties in Hermosa Beach: 1007 17th Street; 1015/1017 17th Street; 1111/1113 17th Street; and 1115/1117 17th Street. He noted that he had submitted a letter to both the Planning Commission and City Council dated May 16, 1988. Mr. Gray stated that 1007 17th Street is a lot of 40 by 140 feet and directly abuts the back of two lots on Prospect on which the owners will be able to erect two units. He stated that two lots within 100 feet of his home will be allowedto build two units. He felt that the downzoning would be inconsistent logic for this particular area. Mr. Gray stated that he is a long-term resident. The property deed shows 17th Street to be Reservoir Street. He has worked in Hermosa Beach since the 1940's, and he met and married his wife in the City. Mr. Gray stated that he has purchased his property over the years and improved it with the intent of providing for the future of his children. Mr. Gray stated that he planned to build another duplex at 1007 17th Street to provide income retirement. The building would be two-story, two-bedroom units and with more than the required number of off-street parking spaces. The adjacent unit, which he built at 1015/1017 17th Street, contains six garages and an additional six outside parking spaces for cars. Mr. Gray pointed out that, even though there is a building moratorium in effect in the City, the City allowed a single-family home to be built on two lots across the street from his home. This house completely covers the lot, is over 5000 square feet, contains five or six bedrooms, and yet the City required only two off-street parking spaces.. He noted concern over future parking problems at this very large home. Mr. Gray stated that he read in the Daily Breeze that the City Council feels that they have a mandate to reduce the density in the 'City. He therefore asked several questions of the Planning Department: (1) How many dwelling units are in Hermosa Beach? The Planning Department answered: The best figure we have is the 1980 census which • -1 -- P.C. Minutes 5/17/88 rri c indicates that there were 9633 dwelling units; (2) How many dwelling units in the area are being considered for downzoning? The Planning Department answered: That number is not available, but if you call back, I will total up the number of units that we have presently; and with those that are being considered at the next Planning Commission meeting, I think it is approximately 80 percent of those being downzoned. The numbers received were: Total number of lots being downzoned, including those in Area 7 are 679; total dwelling units on the above lots is 1089. Mr. Gray stated that if the above numbers are accepted as being approximately 80 percent of the total to be downzoned, the numbers will increase as follows: total lots to be affected by the downzoning would be 849; total dwelling units presently on these lots would be 1362. Again, the 1980 census and the number of dwelling units was listed as 9633. Mr. Gray continued by explaining that, assuming that all the 849 lots were built up to the R-2 maximum, an additional 336 dwelling units would have been added. If there has been a zero increase in the number of dwelling units since 1980 (which is hard to believe), then after all the dust has settled from downzoning, the City fathers have protected the City from an increase in dwelling units, not cars or bedrooms, which amounts to 336 units or a 3.5 percent reduction in dwelling units. He questioned whether this really reduces the City's density problem. Mr. Gray stated that the question must then be asked, are the City fathers making wise use of resources entrusted to them in this time-consuming and labor-intensive effort, when it appears that they do not really have a plan for reducing density. Mr. Gray suggested that it would be better to first develop a plan to get resident automobile parking off the public streets, thereby reducing the so-called density problem. Mr. Gray requested that if the large lots in Area 7 must be downzoned, a clause be added stating: "If a natural or unnatural disaster causes the total destruction of any multiple residences in this area, it may be rebuilt in its entirety providing it has not been sold outside of the owning family after the date creating this downzoning." He noted that at any time, a multiple -family dwelling could be destroyed. Mr. Gray felt that this issue has become a college textbook example of how to downzone someone else's property. He felt that the present piecemeal method of holding hearings is a divide and conquer example of a college course in city planing. He did not feel that this approach is appropriate. He stated that there are places in Hermosa Beach which are large enough to accommodate large numbers of people so that City-wide hearings on downzoning can be held on all the areas at the same time, rather than in piecemeal segments. He felt that by the present approach, the rules and regulations of the City, County, and State are being violated. He further doubted the legality of the findings, and he has been advised by attorneys that there is an excellent chance of a lawsuit relating to the inverse condemnation of property. Mr. Gray felt that all members of the Planning Commission and City Council may be separately and collectively held liable due to loss of property values. He asked that the downzone plans be abandoned and that the moratorium on R-2 construction be lifted. As a citizen of the City, a taxpayer, and a resident voter, he strenuously objected to these actions. Paul Matthis, 1714 Prospect Avenue, Hermosa Beach, stated that he was confused when he .originally voted on Proposition EE. His lot is 50 by 165 feet at 1712/1714 Prospect • P.C. Minutes 5/17/88 c Avenue. His lots are huge, and he built a second house with the intention of his son living in the second house. He felt that the downzoning would result in a loss of retirement income on which he had been depending. He stated that he was told by the City Council that houses rarely burn down in the City. He didn't feel that was an adequate answer. He then asked in a more serious tone what would happen, and the City Council told him to make sure he has good fire insurance. He felt that more appropriate answers must be given to the citizens. Mr. Matthis thought that Proposition EE was to ensure that there would not be highrises on the Strand; not that people would be downzoned. Mr. Matthis asked that his lots be allowed to remain as R-2. He stated, however, that he would have no objection to a rezone to R -2B. Chmn. Compton explained the difference between R-2 and R -2B. He also noted the importance of interested citizens attending the City Council hearings on this matter. Bill Gray again addressed the Commission. He asked about R -2B and what areas are being proposed for the R -2B designation. Chmn. Compton explained that staff recommended that the large areas east of Prospect be rezoned to R -2B. Mr. Gray suggested that all the lots in Area 7 be recommended for a zone change to R - 2B, noting that the lots on the west side of Prospect are also very large. To divide Area 7 into two• halves would be spot zoning. Wilma Burt, 1152 7th Street, Hermosa Beach, stressed that it will be possible next year to change the general plan in order to bring the general. plan and zoning into conformity. She stated that to change the zoning and make these properties legal nonconforming will accomplish nothing. She noted that people with legal nonconforming properties must pay huge fees to the City every time that want to do something with the property. Ms. Burt felt that it is unfair to allow so many new condominiums for new people, while at the same time taking away property rights from the old people who have lived in the City for years and paid taxes. She stressed that this situation is not fair or equitable. Ms. Burt stressed for the benefit of the audience that the general plan can be changed, rather than the zoning, in order to bring both into conformity. Ella Mae Buggy, 1620 Golden Avenue, Hermosa Beach, purchased her two R-2 lots in 1959. She stated that both lots are L-shaped. She opposed any downzoning, stating that if her two lots were merged into one, she could have only one unit. She stated that she has considered building a second unit on her property. The downzoning would greatly devalue her property. Chmn. Compton explained that unless Ms. Buggy's property straddles the property line, she will not be affected by the merger ordinance. He asked whether this particular area has been included in the lot merger ordinance. Mr. Schubach believed this area was included; however, he suggested that Ms. Buggy come to the Planning Department so that he could check the maps before giving a definite answer to Ms. Buggy. P.C. Minutes 5/17/88 c Gary Oates, 917 17th Street, Hermosa Beach, opposed the downzone. He stated that he originally had favored a rezone to R-1 because he thought it would reduce the parking problems; however, after listening to the testimony, he decided that R-1 would not reduce the problem. He noted that his main concern is in regard to parking problems in the area. Mr. Oates suggested that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the area remain R-2 but require that people provide more parking than is currently required in order to alleviate the problem of people driving up and down the streets looking for parking spaces. He suggested that this would be a reasonable compromise. Carl Kirstner, 1720 Prospect Avenue, Hermosa Beach, concurred with all of the comments made by Mr. Matthis. He stated that his objection to the rezone is the fact that if one of his units is destroyed, he would be able to rebuild only one of them. He also opposed because of the fact that it will be more difficult to refinance the property if it is rezoned to R-1. He felt that it would be unfair to even consider a rezone to R-1. Mr. Kirstner stated that his lot is over 8000 square feet and is on the east side of Prospect. He felt his lot is large enough to accommodate a duplex. He felt that the real problem in the City is 19 -foot houses on 25 -foot lots. Mr. Kirstner felt that if something was legally built, the owner should be able to rebuild in the event one of the units is destroyed. He questioned whether someone would even be able to obtain insurance on a duplex which is nonconforming. Paul Daly, 1714 .Golden Avenue, Hermosa Beach, stated that he is in the process of developing an approach to handle development of this property. He stated that he is prepared to take action if the City downzones his property. He stated that he purchased his property as R-2, and he will not tolerate the City downzoningit. to R-1. Comm. Peirce stated, however, that a property owner does not possess by law the right to maintain his property at the zoning at which it was purchased. He stated that courts have upheld the rights of cities who have done just what Hermosa Beach is doing now. Mr. Daly stated that he is prepared to bring a lawsuit if it becomes necessary. He threatened to bring a class action suit against the City based on the loss of people's property values. Lee Ferro, on behalf of Violet Ferro, again addressed the Commission. He brought up the point that his mother's lot, Lot No. 11, is one of the largest lots in the City, and it is zoned R-2 which is all they ever wanted it to be zoned. He stated that he does not want to split or subdivide the lot; he merely wants to maintain it as R-2. The location of this lot is near the school site and is one lot within a total of ten lots. He continued by discussing the number of dwelling units which would be allowed in the area. Mr. Ferro stated that this area is 94.44 percent already developed. He stated that by rezoning this particular lot to R-1, Lot No. 11 would then become the only lot of the total ten lots which would be zoned R-1. Mr. Ferro stated that this lot has been R-2 for 55 years. He stated that his father had intended to develop this property in 1964, and he put in a communal driveway and sewer line in order to be able to build two units at some time in the future. He stated that he could produce a signed statement from the previous building director indicating this fact, which would prove that there has been an intention to build two units on the lot. He '20 — P.C. Minutes 5/17/88 C noted that they were unable to continue with the development due to a lack of funds. Mr. Ferro discussed the open space issue, stating that Lot 11 abuts five acres of open space. He stated there are not many lots in the City which abut so much open space. Public Hearing closed at 9:10 P.M. by Chmn. Compton. Chmn. Compton explained for the benefit of the audience the reason that the Planning Commission is holding these public hearings. Mr. Ferro stated that he lives 400 miles away; he wanted to ensure that he will receive notice of the next hearing on this matter. Chmn. Compton stated that notices will be sent out in regard to the rezoning action. Public Hearing reopened at 9:13 P.M. by Chmn. Compton. Carl Kirstner again addressed the Commission and asked whether any precedent has been set which states that a city cannot downzone property which has already been developed. Mr. Lough replied that such a downzone would create a nonconformity; however, the building is allowed to remain as a legal nonconforming use until it is destroyed or falls into misuse. Comm. DeBellis noted that it is within the purview of the elected officials of the City to change the zoning. He stated that no individual has a legal right to maintain the zoning on property. Mr. Kristner stated, however, that the City has a moral obligation to the residents of the City. Public Hearing closed at 9:17 P.M. by Chmn. Compton. Comm. DeBellis complimented Mr. Gray on his fine presentation; however, he disagreed that this is a textbook case in city planning. He stated that the City is attempting to comply with the State mandate that the general plan and zoning be brought into consistency. He noted that individuals voted for and passed Proposition EE. He noted that if this issue is again voted upon, it could backfire and what was once advisory could become mandatory. Comm. DeBellis stated that the procedure being used by the Planning Commission in regard to holding the hearings is better than if the issue were mandatory. Further, if the issue were mandatory, citizens would not even be receiving individual public notices. As the matter stands now, citizens have at least two opportunities to speak on the matter, once at the Planning Commission level and again at the City Council level. Comm. DeBellis felt that it might be reasonable that Area 7 as a whole be rezoned to R - 2B. By looking at the number of lots under 3500 square feet, there are only 19 lots of the 73, or 26 percent, that could not build two units anyway; therefore, this would result in a reduction of 19 units. Comm. DeBellis continued by discussing the larger lots, stating that only five lots would be able to build two units under the R -2B zoning; therefore, this would result in a reduction of ten units. Lots over 5250 square feet would be allowed at least three units — 21— P.C. Minutes 5/17/88 C under current R-2 zoning; however, if they were rezoned to R -2B, they could build only a maximum of two units. This would result in a reduction of 26 units. Added together, there would be a reduction of 55 units if the area is rezoned to the R -2B zoning designation. He felt that this would be a significant density reduction under R -2B as opposed to R-2. It would also preserve property rights to a certain extent. Comm. Ingell also favored recommending that all of Area 7 be rezoned to R -2B. Comm. Peirce noted that Area 7 is surrounded on four sides by R-1. The lots to the west of Prospect are large; however, they are not developed to the R-2 standard, whereas the lots to the east are developed as R-2. Comm. Peirce believed that the lots to the west of Prospect should be downzoned to R- 1. In regard to the large lots to the east of Prospect, if they were rezoned to R -2B, a small pocket of R -2B would be created in an R-1 area. He felt that this could be considered as spot zoning. He stated that he was still undecided about the area east of Prospect. Chmn. Compton stated that the City is very old, and lots were developed many years ago. He continued by discussing how those tracts were zoned many years ago. He stated that the reasons are compelling to rezone all of Area 7 to R -2B, stating that there could be, density reduction, but at the same time property values would not be decreased by rezoning to R -2B. Comm. DeBellis stated that he favored R -2B only because of the large lot sizes, not the value argument or the threats of lawsuits. He felt that the Planning Commission has tried to take into account the viewpoint of citizens. He concluded by stating that he could favor a rezone to R -2B for all of Area 7. He felt that if people are willing to hold the number of units to two on large lots because of the R-2B„zoning, that would be a tremendous concession on the part of the homeowners. Comm. DeBellis noted that fewer than half of the homeowners in Area 7 appeared to oppose the proposed rezone to R-1. Comm. DeBellis noted that many of the houses in Area 7 are very old and should probably be upgraded. He stated that it is not certain whether this would be accomplished quicker if the zoning were R-1 or R -2B. Comm. Ingell noted that only one letter had been received in support of staff's original recommendation. He felt that there should be more communication from the public so that the Planning Commission would be informed of the sentiments of the community. MOTION by Chmn. Compton, seconded by Comm. DeBellis, to recommend that all of Area 7 be rezoned to R -2B. Comm. DeBellis asked for clarification on the difference between R-2 and R -2B zoning. Mr. Schubach explained that R -2B has all the same requirements of R-2, with the exception that there can be only a maximum of two units per lot. He noted, however, that the R -2B ordinance should be amended in order to delete the old reference to zero lot line development. He stated that that wording should be removed. Comm. Ingell suggested that staff take the appropriate steps to remove the wording relating to zero lot line development. --2z— P.C. Minutes 5/17/88 AYES: Comms. DeBellis, Ingell, Chmn. Compton NOES: Comm. Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. Rue • --.)3- C • P.C. Minutes 5/17/88 I, the undersigned, do declare under penalty of perjury that I did on the 14th day of June , 110.k 88 deposit into the United States post office, first class postage prepaid, a copy of the public notice attached as Exhibit "A" to each and every person attached as Exhibit "B". I warrant that the persons named on Exhibit "B" are all the persons required by applicable law to receive the public notice attached as Exhibit "A". I understand and agree that it is my responsibility to cause these public notices to be made in an accurate and timely fashion and agree to hold the City harmless against any liability whatsoever for any defect of said notice or notices. In the event an action is instituted in a court of com- petent jurisdiction which questions the legality of the public notices, then the City may in its exclusive discretion suspend all hearings or cause the cessation of any construction or of any use which was permitted as a result of a hearing which was held in accordance with the public notice. In the event that the court declares the notice or noticing procedure to be effective, then the City may in its exclusive discretion revoke any permits granted and cause any approvals given pursuant to those public notices to be declared null and void and I agree on behalf of myself and my heirs, assigns or successors -in -interest to hold the City harmless in connection therewith. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. I have executed this declaration on this the 14th day of .T»nP , .1988 at IIermosa Beach, California. CAT. NO. NN00827 TO 1944 CA (9-84) (Individual) STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 1 ti 1 (lame) By: AV ,..L% (sig ature) On On June 14, 1988 C -- a Ziegler TICOR TITLE INSURANCE }a before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared MARTHA ZIEGLER , personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person_ whose name i s subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that she exe- cuted the same. WITNESS my hand atyd'offcial seal. Signature =2 � fxss:42xstamss sussssssa .►:s xs: OFFICIAL SEAL g ~i FRANCENE D. BAKER NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA 3 LOS ANGELES COUNTY • My Commission Expires Nov. 29. 1988 • 141V ti:t `!•tczaztl iii-sLsgol......mr .x:. va...tta (This area for official notarial seal) Planning Department City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 `SAY 0 9 t:18B In re: Zone Change for Area 7 Hearing May 17 Planning Commision We own a single family home at 922 17th. St. in Area 7. We are in favor of the proposed zone change to R1. A few years ago permission was granted for four condos directly across the street from our residence. At that time, we presented many reasons why this would be undesirable. Unfortunately we are now living with greatly increased density. Hopefully this will not occur again in this area. At the present time there are 10 single family homes in our block and 5 duplexes. Of the 10 single homes, there are 4 that contractors and developers would gladly pay a high price to buy -- tear down and develop --so we are constantly facl.ing the dangers of higher and higher density. In August of '87, there was a moratorium on R2 in this area and during that time an older home at 950 was sold to a local contractor. He tore down the small single family home and built a very large single family home. We would rather see this trend continue than the condo or duplex concept. Currently our narrow street cannot accomodate the street parking from the already crowded rentals. WE URGE YOU TO DOWNZONE AREA 7. Sincerely, Paul C. Barr & Betty Barr May 5, 1988 14,4 t K G. DEpARTr'Nr C i, T'Y o F [-IeRNIOS R #RI- I 5- VA Li-. F..1 1) tu H ER rn 0 s A EP,. C It C I o QrrrLE. ME r4 a.FREIN1 cE is mat.,e A� /Y) .e T/ n'e,. /0 RE. hl eh D O N .2(.5--23 Mu).,e tiv R 1 c -t+6 PALO 5 VER oes CtoR.NtFA�•.t=RO?y (>7fty 9,,9 se MAY 1.01988 '-O yO U R savreFie irarc- /72 4 lrc- /7/4 / / 7, /98' e Rb /IV& P A2 O D a 3 .A.c a 4%A/Y 7'/i' .r z / G. /" A .p•vis. 7 ierackv e 7 A /e/ W /Y T6' 7; R A/q .e AA •ditt=A by AI.o,ry hW a 77 124 E 0(114E -A A117C S /4' ,52..eA , aix ) /6 it To 7or/6. ay oc.P Ta .o.ry P4° 0 s .,..c �o C,6' •s-/rQ- s 7-446' o n ?-o 'P / ,9 s / le 0 U .c D x,47-.F,e/.4 <y /? D cE 77.1 Al, uF o rhl P12 o 45 t -y Alre A �rr y s VW.6 v s o f 7-*' A. <. POT.Verr/ac. Q P r�.9.//t yo v Fora yo v2 CO 4' s' rs7va �✓. -26- May 11, 1988 City of Hermosa Beach Planning Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Public Hearing - May 17, 1988 Rezone of Area 7 from R-2 to R-1 Dear Mr. Michael Schubach and Planning Commissioners, This letter of PROTEST is in regard to the above matter. The property I own is located at 1010 17th Street, Hermosa Beach, J. M. Flores Sub Lot 15. Because of the unique length, depth, and zoning of this lot, I purchased this parcel with the ultimate intention of building to the R-2 potential. It is my opinion that with this hearing and the objectives of this hearing, you have the intent to preclude me at some future date from enjoying the same benefits as my neighbors. My property is surrounded by duplexes and you are now divesting me of my rights, the opportunity to reap the monetary benefits of a potential income at my retirement. The Tax Assessor's Office has informed me that prior to Jarvis, all. properties were appraised and taxed according to location and the zoning. I am vehemently opposed to any action by the Planning Commission and/or the City Council with regard to down -zoning of not only my property, but other properties as well. Proposition EE was an advisory vote only, and the results of this were determined by a majority of renters and not property owners. The verbage was confusing and misconstrued by many. Property owners who reside outside the City were not given the opportunity to vote on this issue and I strongly suggest that an in-depth study be conducted with all property owners who will be affected. Sincerely, ks ) Kathleen Ann Berlin 1030 8th Place Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 c P. 0. Box 92 Redondo Beach, CA 90277 May 16, 1988 Planning Commission City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Gentlemen: 4988 I am opposed to any action that would reduce the zone from R2 to RI in the area known as "7" per your recent notice. The so-called "grandfather clause" should be maintained without limitations. As a senior citizen I depend on the income derived from my property and this would be reduced by the change of the zoning. Yours very truly, Velma Mae Winey, Trustee Property address: 1702 Golden Avenue (-, c 5/16/88 TO: HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION. HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL. FROM: BILL D. GRAY SUBJECT: REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN RATHER THAN DOWN ZONE HERMOSA PROPERTY. hereby request that you do not change the zoning of our following properties in Hermosa Beach. 1007, 17th St. 1015/1017, 17th St. 1111/1113, 17th St. 1115/1117, 17th St. 1 request that If the present zoning chages are required to comply with the General Plan that the city make changes to the General plan and leave the zoning as it is. Our families are long time residents of this area, dating back to the late 1800 hundred's. Our property deed indicates that when the land we live on was purchased, 17th St. was called Reservoir St. 1 worked in Hermosa and was married in the little church that was on the northeast corner of Pier Ave. and Valley Drive. We have purchased land over the years and improved it with the intent to provide for our, and our childrens, future. We had planned to build another duplex at 1007, 17th St. to provide Income during my retirement. The building would be a two story , with 2 bedroom units and with more than the required off street parking. The adjacent unit, which we built, at 1015/1017,17th St. contains six garages and six outside parking spaces for cars. C C' Page 2 The lot size is 40' X 140' and with the present zoning would require 4 garages if it was developed as a Duplex. It will only require 2 garages if It is downzoned to an R-1 lot and a 5,000 sq. ft. home with 4 or 5 bedrooms could be built there. An example of the so-called "reduced density" (built during the R-2 moratorium),effort can be seen in the new house nearing completion at 950, 17th St. where a building contractor has built a 5,000 sq. ft. home that almost completly covers the lot and towers over each adjacent house. Please note that although this is a "single family home " it has five or six bedrooms and the R-1 building code requires only 2 garage spaces. Guess where the cars for the other bedrooms will be parked? 1 have read in the Daily Breeze that the city concil feels that they have a mandate to reduce the density of our city. I therfore inquired at the city planning department as to the following. 1. How many Dwelling Units exist in Hermosa. Answer: The best figure we have is the 1980 census which indicates that there was 9.633 Dwelling Units. 2. How many Dwelling units are In the areas being considered for down zoning? Answer: That quantity is not available, but if I can call you back, l will total up the number of units that we have presently and with those that are being considered this Tuesday night 1 think that is approximately 80% of those being down -zoned. The Numbers received were as follows; Total lots being down zoned, including Tues eve's quantity, = 679 Total Dwelling Units on the above lots, =1089 C C Page 3 If we accept the above as being approximately 80 % of the total to be down zoned then the numbers increase as follows. Total lots to be affected by down zoning = $49 Total Dwelling Units presently on these lots. =1.362 Refer again to the 1980 census and the number of Dwelling Units which was 9.63 . Assuming that all the 849 lots were built up to an R-2 maximum we would have added 849 X 2 =1,698 -1,362 = 336 additional dwelling units. If there has been "0" increase in the number of Dwelling Units since 1980, hard to believe, then after all the dust has settled from down zoning our city fathers have protected us from an increase in dwelling units, not cars or bedrooms, that amounts to 336 units or a 3.5 %. reduction in dwelling units. Does his really reduce our city's density problem? The question must then be asked, are the city fathers making a wise use of resources entrusted to them, in this time consuming and labor intensive effort, when it appears that they do not really have a plan for REDUCING DENSITY . Wouldn't it be better to first develop a plan to get resident automobile parking off the public streets, thereby reducing the so-called density problem. And in conclusion I would request that if you must down zone our large lots In area 7 that you provide a clause which will read somewhat as follows. " If a natural or unnatural disaster causes the total destruction of any multiple residence in this area it may be rebuilt in its entireity providing it has not been sold outside of the owning family after the date creating this downzoning". Respecfully Y ill D. Gray 1115, 17th St. Hermosa Beach. 19 May 1988 City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 11.44Y 2 4 19$8 As we are no longer residing in Germany we just received the Notice of Zone Change for Area 7 this week. Please accept this letter as my wholehearted support to rezone Area 7 of Hermosa Beach from R-2 to R-1. Anyone only needs to drive through this area to see that it would be in the best interest of all who reside there to reduce the number of inhabi- tants. The number of vehicles parked in streets is definitely a hazard and it is obvious that a decrease in the population density would be an improve- ment both evironmentally and aesthetically. Thank you for your interest and consideration. llace L. Emo 11132 Abbeywood Oklahoma City, OK 73170 C 23 May 1988 Hermosa Beach City Council City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attention: City Council Members Subject: Rezone of Area 7 MAY 2 b V88 The purpose of this correspondence is to strongly request that the Rezone of Area 7 from R-2 to R-1, as proposed, not be approved or implemented. This repeat attempt to make the General Plan and the Zoning Map compatible by down zoning, from R-2 to R-1, the largest lots in the City is not equitable to the present or future homewowners. Specifically, this change to a legal, but non -conforming status will have the following immediate impacts: 1) Reduces equity in existing two -unit dwellings by a conservative estimate of fifty -percent. 2) Eliminates S&L and Bank first mortgage refinancing, second mortgage improvement, and new mortgage loans. 3) Forces insurance coverage to values substantially less than replacement level of existing two -unit dwellings, if available at all. However, at the recent Hermosa Beach Planning Commission Meeting of 17 May 1988, a very equitable compromise was discussed and approved by the Commission as a recommendation to the City Council. Instead of rezoning Area 7 from R-2 to R-1 to achieve a density change of 73 units and forcing residents and owners to acquire legal services as avenues of recourse, the Commission recommendation was to change the Area 7 zoning from R-2 to R -2B. This would make a two -unit limit per lot mandatory, reduce the zoning to R-1 for lots below the minimum square foot limit, and eliminate the three, four and five units per lot currently authorized for larger R-2 lots. This in effect would produce 55 units of reduced density and yet allow current two -unit residences to not only be legal but conform, and make these units and similar R-2 lots attractive for future improvement and purchase. 23 May 1988 Page 2 I therefore, again, strongly request you review this attractive compromise to obtain a resolution that satisfies both the City and homeowner objectives. Sincerely, ,da,Adf Mr. Richard Holmes 1001 Seventeenth St. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 1 Warren Barr, O.D. 1246 Seventeenth Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 p A-0 ti` C ds4- r re- —Zah 2 ,/2-2- to d`"'-1, o� /7 k ;1y A orK goy - g.4 w r' 1"'- /r• 7A • Yr S a GA. or, e. ae-)ow/gefir c. C 044-tn7 C `afet !UN 21 1988 Pi9trre/ rrc- be":74027-Azoerz- C. o F A/Meino5.9 . cr,` /71/5' go -A.4 J1i'iue y 17,r.em o s,s "•431-cri CC, . 9a CE/7 r --h .e — .1° ¢ =17.°'4c rye.c f 47611)4' 270 >1 OU 19 k 77 CZ.race/ri r< ,t9 /79 •.E r. •7' o- 7 3 ,s4,�s. ,a o ni v rr Az a fir, /PPP a. -,4-A? iv/r G- A / /Z o PO 5 7-c - C, '7G- 77 a rr r rYG. J of TO /1 , 1729 2,1 AelUC FL0 UbeS tR , ?o 27'/ / 9 FC 'SUN 21 1888 /9/? 7 F241,07 Zek w,- 7--Ael PAto/gr /a as -/ o a`-17r�s Eei l.r -r6.F .4,Q .� W / S L Td s-7-02 ,0 O7r o -h y O 18 C. 7- :7-d A te' =o rr / n' G- 7 c) /Q / I s / 7-- P/to p p SObi'e_es: 7 -NA? uJc U,c. /7 /,7 .9 rer» .R max/ 2 D 0 %Jo T r' 05- (Jp,t e) 7ZL .tr s ©if= 7 -bio o F= 7-1/ PR o P•Ei 7-y .9 r/< c) 4) /40r4., yo U >z 00 0'5/D .F/a i June 24, 1988 Hermosa Beach City Council City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 Attention: City Council Members Subject: Rezone of Area 7 We are writing to advise you that we strongly object to the property in Area 7 being rezoned from R2 to R1. We purchased our property, in Area 7, paying the price for an R2 lot, with the intent of developing the property with a small rental unit. Over the last few years we have invested in plans to meet our requirements and fully intend to develop the property as planned. We were unable to be present at the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission Meeting of May 17, 1988, however, we understand an equitable compromise was approved by the Commission as a recommendation to the City Council. The Commission recommendation is to change the Area 7 zoning from R2 to R2B, allowing a two -unit limit for lots whose size meets the minimum square foot limit. We feel this recommendation meets both the city and homeowner objectives. We plan to be present at the City Council public hearing on this issue of June 28th. Since rezoning from R2 to R1 would force us to acquire legal services as our avenue of recourse, we urge you to approve the aforementioned Commission recommendation. Sincerely, G7/41-441-t.)/f Andrew M. Muckersie Kathleen A. Muckersie 1639 Prospect Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 June 20, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council June 28, 1988 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD "ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, GRADES K-8, SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT" TO THE R-1 PERMITTED USE LIST LOCATION: CITY WIDE; ALL R-1 ZONES INITIATED BY STAFF Recommendation Planning Commission and staff recommend adding "ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, GRADES K-8, C.U.P. REQUIRED" to the R-1 permitted use list. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of June 7, 1988, recommended approval of a text amendment to allow "elementary school, grades K-8" to the permitted use list and a Negative Declaration. Analysis The Zoning Ordinance currently allows Educational buildings and playgrounds in the Open Space zone. The proposed zoning amendment will allow elementary schools, grades kindergarden through eighth, in the R-1 zone, and therefore, will also be allowed in R-2 and R-3 zones. Additional background and analysis is provided in the attached Planning Commission staff report of June 7, 1988. Attachment T7 -777 -Ordinance 88- 2. Resolution P.C. 88-46 3. P.C. Staff Report of 6/7/88 4. P.C. Minutes of 6/7/88 CO el( A 4 iw Mic ae Sc u•ac Planning Director evin B. Northcraft City Manager a/pcsrtext • 1 n• r'•• area Associate PI: ner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 11 25 2 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD "ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, GRADES K-8, C.U.P. REQUIRED" TO THE R-1 ZONE, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE, AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on June 28, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony on this matter and made the following Findings: A. Schools are currently allowed in the Open Space zones; B. The school district has available schools zoned unclassified which cannot currently be used for schools because unclassified areas have been defined as equivalent to R-1 zoning; C. Schools are typically found in residential areas and serve a • useful purpose including open. space and recreational space; D. Elementary schools may not have a detrimental effect in residential zones when appropriate conditions of approval are imposed; E. A Conditional Use Permit shall be required, therefore, any proposed school shall be discretionary, and shall therefore, require a site specific environmental assessment; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN THE FOLLOWING TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND APPROVES AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. SECTION 1: 7 28 Amend the R-1, Single -Family Residential Zone permitted use list, Article 4, Section 4-2, to include the following in alphabetical order the following: "Elementary School, Grades K-8, Conditional Use Permit required" PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CONTINUED - ORDINANCE 88 - ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: a/pcsrtext CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY TO arkoritunit fauteriais •1 2 3 4 5 6. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 RESOLUTION P.C. 88-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIONOF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD "ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, GRADES K-8, C.U.P. REQUIRED" TO THE R-1 ZONE, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE, AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public bearing on June 7, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony on this matter and made the following Findings: A. School are currently allowed in the Open Space zones. B. The school district has available land zoned R-1 which cannot currently be used for schools. C. Schools provide recreational space for, adjacent residential uses. D. Elementary schools may not have a detrimental effect in residential zones wben appropriate conditions of approval are imposed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby recommend that the City Council make that following text amendment to the zoning ordinance and approve an Environmental Negative Declaration. SECTION 1: Amend the R-1, Single -Family Residential. Zone permitted use list, Article 4, Section 4-2; to include the followingin. alphabetical order the following: "Elementary School, Grades K-8, Conditional Use Permit required", VOTE: AYES: Comms.DeBellis,Ingell,Peirce,Rue,Cbmn.Compton- NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I bereb e ,y that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 88-46 is a tur an• om• ete record of the action taken by the Planning is- • the City of Hermosa Beach, Call rn.i,'� a their meeti g June 7, 1988. 6 27 28 eral Compton, Chairman ate Mic c ach, Secretary 1 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission June 1, 1988 Regular Meeting of June 7, 1988 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD "ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, GRADES K-8, SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT" TO THE R-1 PERMITTED USE LIST LOCATION: CITY WIDE; ALL R-1 ZONES INITIATED BY KEVIN B. NORTHCRAFT, CITY MANAGER Recommendation Staff recommends adding "ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, GRADES K-8, C.U.P: REQUIRED" to the R-1 permitted use list. Background At the Staff Environmental Review meeting of May 19, 1988, the review committeee recommended that a focused E.I.R. be prepared for the proposed text amendment. Staff is recommending a Negative Declaration for this project since a text amendment is not a site specific action. Since a school within a residential zone will require a discretionary action (C.U.P.) a focus E.I.R. would be more applicable to a site specific request. Analysis The Zoning Ordinance currently allows Educational buildings and playgrounds in the Open Space zone. The proposed zoning amendment will allow elementary school, grades kindergarden through eight grades. The Hermosa Beach School District currently has a school site, Hermosa View School, which is currently zoned partially Open Space and partially Unclassified. The City Attorney has determined that all unclassified areas are designated R-1 for all intent and purposes. Therefore, the School District has school property which cannot be used for school purposes since schools are not allowed in the R-1 zone. Overall, staff believes that schools are beneficial to residential uses, e.g. recreation. Upon a request for a conditional use permit for a specific site, staff can analyze the site and add conditions and mitigation measures which will resolve any impacts the school may cause. It should be noted that once the use is listed in the R-1 zone, it is also automatically included in R-2 an CONC ae Sc u'ac Planning Director 5 Per Associate anner TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD "SCHOOL" TO THE PERMITTED USE LIST IN THE R=1 ZONE WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated June 1, 1988. At the Staff Environmental Review meeting on May 19, 1988, the review committee recommended that a focused EIR be prepared for the proposed text amendment. Staff is recommending a negative declaration for this project since a text amendment is not a site specific action. Since a school within a residential zone will require a discretionary action (CUP), a focused EIR would be more applicable to a site specific request. The zoning ordinance currently allows educational buildings and playgrounds in the open space zone. The proposed zoning amendment would allow elementary schools, grades kindergarten through eighth grade. The Hermosa Beach School District currently has a school . site, Hermosa View School, which is currently zoned partially open space and partially unclassified. The City Attorney has determined that all unclassified areas are designated R-1 for all intents and purposes.- Therefore, the School District has school property which cannot be used for school purposes since schools are not allowed in the R-1 zone. Overall, staff believes that schools are beneficial to residential uses; e.g., recreation. Upon a request for a conditional use permit for a specific site, staff can analyze the site and add conditions and mitigation measures which will resolve any impacts the school may, cause. It should be noted that once the use is listed in the R-1 zone, it is also automatically included in the R-2 and R-3 zones. Staff recommended the addition of "Elementary School, Grades K-8, CUP Required" to the R-1 permitted use list. He stressed that only K-8 will be allowed, not any other types of schools, such as business schools or ballet schools, for example. Chmn. Compton asked why this issue is before the Planning Commission at this time. Mr. Lough explained that the Bilingual School, which is now located at the South School site, would like to relocate to Hermosa View School. To do so, it is necessary to occupy more than the buildings currently located there. They need to add temporary classrooms on the site; however, they prefer not to put all the temporary classes on the open space because it would eliminate the playground area and cause too much crowding. By putting the temporary classrooms on the unclassified area, they will have the ability to have a P.C. Minutes 6/7/88 C C better school area. If the area is left as open space, there would be a conflict with the ten percent lot area requirement. He stated that the applicant has been working with staff on this matter, and a text amendment appears to be the least offensive way to resolve the problem. Staff feels this to a fairly innocuous request compared to a case where someone wants to construct a school from scratch. He explained that unclassified area is treated as R-1 under the current code. Mr. Lough concluded by stating that the current litigation with the School District has nothing whatsoever to do with this request. Comm. DeBellis asked whether the zoning code definition of "school" refers to private school and public school. Mr. Schubach replied that the definition does not distinguish between private and public; therefore, the K-8 grades could be either private or public. Public Hearing opened at 8:39 P.M. by Chmn. Compton. Todd Haro, principal of the International Bilingual School located at 425 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission. He said that if this recommendation is approved, it will be possible to install four portable buildings at the site in addition to•the existing classrooms. This would be very convenient for the school children. If the recommendation is not approved, it would be necessary to put the temporary classrooms on the playground area, which -would not look attractive to the neighbors. He asked the Commission to consider approval of this request. • Public Hearing closed at 8:40 P.M. by Chmn. Compton. Chmn. Compton asked whether the neighbors had been notified of this request. Mr. Schubach replied in the negative, explaining that the request at this time is only for a text amendment. All neighbors within 300 feet of this property will be notified at such time when the International Bilingual School actually requests the conditional use permit. MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by Comm. Ingell, to approve Resolution P.C. 88-46 as written by staff. AYES: Comms. DeBellis, Ingell, Peirce, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Recess taken from 8:42 P.M. until 8:48 P.M. -7- P.C. Minutes 6/7/88 41116 il c Easy- Reader Run Date: June'16, 1988 .DISPLAY Acct: 7010-2110 PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach shall hold a public hearing on June 28, 1988 to consider the following: 1. Rezone of area 7 from R-2 to R-1 or to such other zone as de• emed aoorooriat by City Council & adopt an Environmental Negative Declaration.* Text amendment to add "school" to permitted use list in R-1 zone with Conditional.Use Permit & Environmental Negative Declaration.. •3: Text amendment to amend Specific Plan'Area for Biltmore Site Ordinance 84-751, location generally between 13th to 15th Street and the Strand to Hermosa Avenue. *Map on file in Planning Department. SAID PUBLIC HEARING shall be at •R.nn P.M. in the City Hall Council Chamber, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested are invited to participate at that time and place or to write to the City Council in care of the Planning and Environmental Services Department at the above address PRIOR to Thursday, June 23, 1988 at 12:00 noon IF YOU CHALLENGE the above matter(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing.described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Department at, or prior to, the public hearing. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact the Planning Department at 376-6984,_ Ext. 242. Kevin Northcraft City Manager City of Hermosa Beach June 22, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council June 28, 1988 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 88-3 FOR TEXT AMENDMENT OR REPEAL OF "BILTMORE SITE" SPECIFIC PLAN AREA ORDINANCE 84-751 INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation Planning Commission and staff recommend adoption of the attached ordinance amending the Specific Plan Area (SPA). Background On December 15, 1987, the City Council adopted a resolution of intent to study repealing the Specific Plan Area. On March 15, 1988, the Planning Commission recommended a comprehensive study to consider alternatives to repealing the SPA. On May 24, 1988, the City Council directed staff to study amending and/or repealing the existing SPA and to have this matter brought back before the City Council within 60 days. On June 7 and June 21, 1988, the Planning Commission studied amending or repealing the existing ordinance, and opted to amend the ordinance. Analysis The recommended ordinance is essentially the SPA ordinance adopted in 1985. The following notes the modifications proposed by the Planning Commission and staff: Permitted Uses This section was rewritten into two main categories -- "Primary Permitted Uses" and "Ancillary Uses". The only primary use should be the hotel; everything else should be secondary and related to the hotel, e.g. a "conference center facility" should not be permitted independent of a hotel. Also, under permitted uses health and fitness facilities should be for hotel guest only unless allowed with a Conditional Use Permit since this type of use could result in a large parking demand if it were open to the public. 1 Use Approvals (Removed from Ordinance) This section was unnecessary, and was somewhat non-sensical since section 1403-1414 of the zoning ordinance as referred to does not require uses to have a Conditional Use Permit instead only notes procedures to follow. Also all the permitted uses listed in the SPA which require a Conditional Use Permit are noted in that context. It is a given that a use can not be established until a Conditional Use Permit is issued. Subject Property Development Standards This section has been modified as follows: "(a) Intensity": Allow 60% lot coverage instead of 56% plus a variation of 2%. This SPA is no longer modeled after a certain conceptual plan; therefore some additional allowance should be provided. "(b) Building Height": Change from 45 feet to 40 feet. The downtown area has been recently limited to 35 feet; therefore 45 feet no longer seems appropriate, but 35 feet would be too limited for a 250 room hotel. "(c) Parking": Without certainty to exactly what combinations of uses will be proposed, the use of the current parking ordinance which allows for parking plans, and therefore can allow flexibility in parking should be used to regulate parking. Since public parking exists on the property and is required by the Coastal Commission, provisions for that parking must be recognized. "(e) Archetectural Consideration": The previous statement was too subjective to enforce. The modified statement will guarantee architectural treatment on all sides of the structures which is necessary because it will be visible and approached from all sides. "(h) Landscaping": Landscaping should be designed by a competent person; therefore it should be required that a licensed architect prepare the landscape plan. "(i) Signs": sign "sizes" should be regulated; the actual signs are already noted in SPA text. "(1) Trash Storage": A common problem is unsanitary conditions surrounding trash enclosures. To allow for cleansing of this area a hose bib should be provided. Bicycle Parking Based on observation of existing restaurants along the Strand, a minimum of 100 bicycle stalls should be provided. 2 M Other Changes Some changes and deletions were necessary since there connected to the ordinance need of improvement. to the wording of the 1985 ordinance is no longer a development agreement Also, some of the wording was in Attachments 1. Proposed ordinance 2. P.C. staff report dated 6/15/1988 & 3/29/1988 3. P.C. Resolution 88-47 4. 1985 SPA ordinance 5. 1984 SPA ordinance 6. Public notice affidavit CONCUR: Kevin B. Northtraft City Manager Respectfully submitted, Michael Schubac Planning Director CITY MANAGER COMMENT: Regarding Section 9.621(d)(2)- (1/2 acre park), the staff consensus was not in favor of this provision for these reasons: - Parks near public beaches duplicate available open space in the immediate area and can attract undesirable elements, placing an increased burden on local law enforcement (Santa Monica and Santa Barbara are two examples of cities with beach area parks with problems) - A ground level park eliminates the possibility of use of this land for added parking and commercial store fronts along Hermosa Avenue. 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 84-751 A SPECIFIC PLAN AREA FOR AREA COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE BILTMORE SITE. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on June 28, 1988 and made the following Findings; A. The attached ordinance will help achieve the goals, policies, and programs of the General Plan and Local Coastal Program; B. The amended ordinance will more adequately regulate the use of the subject property; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain the attached ordinance amending ordinance 84-751 a Specific Plan Area generally between 15th and 13th Street, and the Strand and Hermosa Avenue. Section 1. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Section 2. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: T/ccorbilt CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM, ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 84-751 A SPECIFIC PLAN AREA TO REGULATE DEVELOPMENT GENERALLY IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA BETWEEN 15TH AND 13TH STREETS AND THE STRAND AND HERMOSA AVENUE. ARTICLE 9.6, CHAPTER 1, SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 1 Section 9.611. Authority This Specific Plan is an instrument for implementing the Local Coastal Program ("LCP") and General Plan of the City, pursuant to Article 8, Chapter 3 of the State Planning and Zoning Law (Cal. Gov't. Code Sec. 65450 et seq.). Section 9.612. Location This Specific Plan regulates the "Biltmore Site" and adjacent lots (the "Subject Property") bounded on the west by the Strand, partially bounded on the north by Fifteenth Street, partially bounded on the east by Hermosa Avenue and on the south by Thirteenth Street as described in the Basic Concept Drawings attached hereto as Exhibit "A." Section 9.613. Area Description The Subject Property encompasses 2.99 acres of topographically flat land, consisting of 2.33 acres of vacant land and .66 acres upon which one and two story residential/commercial buildings now exist. The Subject Property is located near the Central Business District ("CBD") and adjacent to the Strand providing an opportunity for commercial/recreational development that could contribute significantly to the economy of the City and the revitalization of the commercial district. Section 9.614. Basic Concept Drawings The Basic Concept Drawings attached hereto as Exhibit "A" depict the boundaries of the Subject Property, the location of the Project and the alterations proposed to existing streets. Exhibit "A" also indicates the basic design concept for the Project incorporating the objectives, policies, standards and regulations herein. Section 9.615. Purpose The purpose of this Specific Plan is to set forth design principles and development standards for a hotel, conference center, arking facilities, public park and other ancillary uses (the "Project") that will enhance the commercial and recreational potential of the Subject Property while achieving the goals, policies, and objectives articulated in the General Plan and the LCP. This Specific Plan shall provide the following: - 5 - (a) Establish objectives, policies, regulations, development standards, and review criteria for the Project on the Subject Property; (b) Preserve the unique coastal character of the area and assure that development of the Subject Property will comply with California Coastal Act policies, promote local economic stability, and meet the needs of local residents and beach visitors; and (c) Implement the goals, objectives, and policies identified in the Local Coastal Program Element of the General Plan. Section 9.616. Specific Plan Development Objectives Proper development of the Subject Property is critical to the economic and environmental future of the City, therefore, the major objectives of this Specific Plan are as follows: (a) Assure the development of the Project in a manner consistent with the Hermosa Beach City Code ("HBCC") and the scale and location of the Subject Property; (b) Assure coastal access for visitors and residents; (c) Assure adequate parking; (d) Minimize adverse impacts of the Project on neighboring residential uses, ,especially as they relate to traffic, noise and visual effects; (e) Establish a long range and continuing source of revenue for the City; (f) Facilitate the safe and convenient flow of traffic in the area; and (g) Provide for permitted uses which are complementary to the Project use and to the City's CBD. - Section 9.617. Area Development Policies To effectively achieve the foregoing objectives, the following policies shall be applied to the design and construction of the Project: (a) Project unity and identity shall be achieved through the careful siting of building and parking areas, the development of an effective circulation system, the coordination and control of building design, landscaping, lighting, signing, and similar features. (b) The design and control of pedestrian and vehicular circulation shall provide safe and convenient access to the Project. (c) The standards of development set forth in Section 9.621 below shall be applied to realize the unique potential of - 6- the area and to provide for a high quality Project, compatible with commercial uses while maintaining a desirable environment for surrounding residents. Maximum flexibility, consistent with the goals, objectives and policies expressed herein, shall be allowed to encourage imaginative design and development. Section 9.618. Primary Permitted Uses (A) Hotel; Section 9.619 Ancillary Permitted Uses (A) Conference Center facility; (B) Parking facilities; (C) Compatible Uses: (1) Food related: a. Restaurant, excluding drive-ins; b. Delicatessen; c. On-site alcoholic beverage sales, including bars and cocktail lounges, provided such uses are a part of a bona fide eating place or hotel (subject to issuance of a Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.)); (2) Entertainment and recreation related (subject to issuance of a C.U.P.): a. Dancing; b. Live entertainment; c. Amplified and recorded music; d. Audio/visual entertainment; e. Health and fitness facility (C.U.P. required if catering to other than hotel guest); (3) Service related: a. Automotive rental agency storage of not more than three rental vehicles (excluding repair and/or servicing); cleaning; b. Apparel repair, alteration and c. Barber and beauty shop; d. Shoe repair and polishing; e. Ticket sales agency; f. Travel agency; 7.= 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 guest only; g. Health and fitness facility for hotel (4) Retail related: a. Apparel shop; b. Art gallery; c. Bookstore; d. Camera shop; e. Candy, nut and confectionary shop; f. Cigar store; g. Drugstore; h. Florist; i. Greeting card shop; j. Jewelry shop; k. Specialty gift shop; 1. Stationery store; (D) Other uses not permitted above may be determined by the Planning Commission to be permitted uses if they meet the following criteria: (1) The proposed use will not create circumstances, effects or conditions which are undesirable, more intensive or substantially different than the other uses permitted herein. Factors to consider are traffic, hours of operation, equipment, and the nature of the use; (2) The proposed use will be compatible with the uses permitted herein; (3) The proposed use is similar in scope, purpose, and operation to the uses permitted herein; (4) The proposed use will promote the objectives stated herein; prohibited. (5) The proposed use is not otherwise Section 9.620. Prohibited Uses All uses are prohibited unless provided for and authorized herein. Under no circumstance shall the following uses be permitted as principal or accessory uses: (a) Residential dwellings, including trailer and mobile home parks; -8- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (b) Churches, Synagogues, temples and other uses primarily devoted to religious worship; (c) Educational institutions; (d) Drive-in restaurants; (e) Billboards; (f) Hospitals, sanitariums, homes for the aged and other similar uses. Section 9.621. Subject Property Development Standards To achieve the foregoing objectives, the following standards shall be applied to the development of any Project on the Subject Property: (a) Intensity. Development of the Subject Property shall comply with the following: (1) The above grade lot coverage of the Project shall not exceed 60% of the Subject Property; (2) The number of guest rooms shall not exceed 250; (3) The Conference Center facility shall not exceed an area of 7,000 square feet. (b) Building Height. The Project shall have no more than four (4) stories and the building height shall not exceed 40 feet. (c) Parking. Parking shall comply with Article 11.5 Off Street Parking of the zoning ordinance plus an additional 100 spaces for th public. (d) Open Space. As indicated on Exhibit "A", the_ Project shall preserve and enhance open space by providing and maintaining the following: (1) A plaza facing the Strand; (2) An approximately 1/2 acre park for general public use. To the extent permitted by law, no future non -park use may be made of the surface of the park -designated area of the Subject Property unless and until this Specific Plan is amended according to Article 15 Amendments of the zoning ordinance. (e) Architectural Considerations. (1) Compatible architectual treatment shall be carried out on the front, rear and sides of the entire development; (2) Roof. The roof shall be sand -colored; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (3) Windows. The use of chrome -colored or mirrored glass shall bee prohibited. (f) Equipment. Air conditioners, duct work and similar equipment shall not be located on the roof of the building and shall be screened from public view. (g) Circulation. (1) Fifteenth Court shall be made one-way eastbound to ensure a circular flow of traffic for service vehicles; (2) There shall be no public pedestrian ingress from 15th Street; (3) There shall be no public pedestrian ingress from Beach Drive between 15th Street and 15th Court. (h) Landscaping. Landscaping and automatic irrigation prepare by a licenced landscape architect shall be provided and made complementary to the Subject Property's coastal location; subject to review and approval of the Planning Director. (i) Signs. The sign sizes on the hotel shall not exceed that currently permitted by the HBCC. Signs shall be allowed as follows: (1) A monument sign not to exceed eight feet in height shall be permitted on the Subject Property adjacent to Hermosa Avenue; (2) Four temporary construction signs not to exceed 200 square feet shall be permitted on the site during construction. Total construction sign square footage shall not exceed 800 square feet; (3) Such additional square footage of signage__ allowed by the HBCC which may be placed at any point upon any of the facades of the Project Improvements. (4) All signs shall be reviewed by the Building Director for compliance with HBCC Section 28-Al2. (j) Utilities. All utilities shall be underground. (k) Sprinklered Building. The Project, including all structures, will be sprinklered. Said installation will be in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code, 1985 edition. (1) Trash Storage. Trash storage areas shall be screened from the view of neighboring residential uses and shall be conveniently located for service vehicles. Enclosures shall be constructed out of the same material as the building. The location and screening of the area shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. A hose bib at trash location shall be provided for cleaning of area. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (m) Loading Areas. Loading, unloading and service activity areas shall be screened to minimize the view from and noise to neighboring residential uses and located for convenient use by service vehicles. (n) Noise Buffering. To minimize noise to neighboring residential uses, the ground floor windows facing 15th Street shall be non-operable and hotel rooms with operable windows facing 15th Street shall not be used as hospitality suites. (o) Site Design. • (1) Open and landscaped areas shall be provided around the building and shall highlight primary entrances; (2) Parking shall be located to provide safe and convenient access to uses and shall contribute to an overall circulation pattern. Section 9.622. Public Transit The developer shall institute an airport shuttle for hotel guests. Section 9.623. Bicycle Parking The developer shall provide not less than one hundred permanently mounted bicycle parking stalls, at a location to be approved by the Planning Director. Section 9.624. Severability If any part or provision of this Specific Plan, or any application thereof, is held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision or application will not be deemed valid, except to the extent permitted by law, but all other provisions or applications shall continue in full force and effect. T/pcorbilt 3�. N ITTEENTH HERMOSA AVENUE 1 I 1- 40UR-TEENTI1 cam, 11 1 1 .I i PUBLIC PARK I W z JE AC 44 PUBLIC STR FAT ESTAURANT W/VIEW PATIO i CAFE r r • BEACH FRONT ' PLAZA THIRTEENTH GROUND LEVEL 6 soPr $ao RT HERMOSA BEACH HOTEL V SISIHXS 4-1 [Y -T1 i 1 t C t 3- 3 3 - PUB. 14BLIC OCEAN VIEW REFRESHMENT DECK • 1 1 MEZZANINE LEVEL 0 H[RMOS, BEACH HOTEL 'GUEST ROOMS • • 41rk1IrIiF`41 d;= 3 rFrG�.t .1 i 1 , TIIIRD & FOURTH IEVEI e li' 1• . !OPT tooFr HERMOSA BEACH -H HOTEL V SISIHX3 T 1 1 1 11 1 1 r•••• ••••••• 11811111 I t%I*11%1 •• ••••••••••• •• 11.11111 1451,4%1 PUBLIC PARKING AREA 1 PUBLIC PARKING AREA •••••••Ik SUB -GRADE PARKING • HERMOSA BEACH. HOTEL • •• I •• • 40•••• *ft $$$$ 444 440 V 118IHX2 • E ackgr oar s ii a 1r r-tajs June 15, 1988 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission June 21, 1988 (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 7, 1988 MEETING) SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 88-3 FOR TEXT AMENDMENT OR REPEAL OF "BILTMORE SITE" SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, ORDINANCE 84-751 INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution amending the Biltmore Specifc Plan Area (SPA). Background On December 15, 1987, the City Council adopted a resolution of intent to study repealing the Specific Plan Area. On March 15, 1988, the Planning Commission recommended a comprehensive study to consider alternatives to repealing the SPA. On May 24, 1988, the City Council directed staff to study amending and/or repealing the existing SPA and to have this matter brought back before the City Council within 60 days. • Analysis Repealing Ordinance The staff has prepared an analysis, and has made a recommendation concerning repealing the ordinance; the report was submitted to the Planning Commission on March 15, 1988 and to the City Council on April 26, 1988 (refer to attached staff report dated April 26, 1988). In essence, staff believes a comprehensive study should first be conducted so that the L.C.P. and L.U.P. can also be appropriately amended with the approval of the Coastal Commission. Amendment to SPA Ordinance The existing SPA is lacking comprehensiveness, and in some instances is ambiguous. However, the SPA is conceptually acceptable to the State Coastal Commission, and meets the goals, objectives and policies of the L.C.P. By amending the existing SPA, an improved version would result which would not be in conflict with the Local Coastal Program, or the certified Land Use Plan. _ 16_ In amending the SPA as proposed in the attached ordinance the following subjects are addressed: 1. Area description 2. Conceptual plans 3. Purpose 4. Objectives 5. Policies 6. Permitted uses 7. Prohibited uses 8. Conditional uses 9. Approval process 10. Development standards 11. Public transit 12. Bicycle parking 13. Severability ITERael Schu1ach Planning Director T/pcsrbilt C (" March 29, 1988 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission April 5, 1988 (CONTINUED FROM 3/15/1988 MEETING) SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 88-3 -- REPEAL OF BILTMORE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA (SPA) INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation Staff recommends a comprehensive study of this matter including amendments to Local Coastal Program and Land Use Plan prior to repealing the Specific -Plan Area. Background The City Council at their December 15, 1987 meeting adopted a resolution of intent to study repealing the Specific Plan Area originally adopted in May, 1984. Analysis Zoning (Map 1 attached) If the Specific Plan Area is repealed, the area will revert to its original zoning according to the City Attorney. The original zoning is C-2. Hotels and accessory uses such as restaurants, cocktail and entertainment lounges which currently are the only uses permitted under the Specific Plan Area are among the many other uses which are allowed in the C-2 zone. Since the various uses permitted under the C-2 zone are non -discretionary, only a building permit would be needed prior to construction. The C-2 zone would allow a maximum of 35' in height, and a setback with landscaping where the subject property abuts residential. Local Coastal Program (LCP) There are several relevant policy statements found within the Local Coastal Program. The. Local Coastal Program policies state the following: "Hermosa Beach shall maintain its current high level of .recreational access to the coast and its recreational facilities and be consistent with maintaining the beach in its most natural state. Maximum access and recreational opportunities shall be provided for all the people consistent with public safety needs and the need to protect public rights, rights of private property owners, and natural resource areas from overuse. The City shall protect its coastal resources for recreational activities. Policy: That the City should promote beach and recreational facilities related commercial development by refining the commercial (C-2) zone to encourage commercial -recreational uses. Policy: The Biltmore Site is a vital asset of the people of Hermosa Beach which will play a substantial role in maintaining the City as a financially feasible entity. The City has determined that the mostbeneficial, economic and environmental coastal use for this site is a hotel/conference use. Policy: That the City encourage coastal related commercial land uses within the downtown area. Policy: Develop design standards for development of the Biltmore Site and other City owned property which are in keeping with the scale and character of the area. Policy: That the City will maintain the existing commercial -recreational orientation in the downtown area. Program: Zoning and Building codes limit the height of all structures, depending on zone. The maximum height in each residential R-1, R-2 and R-3.zones are 25 ft.,.30 ft. and 35 ft., respectively. The maximum height in the City is 45 ft. or three stories in the commercial zone with the exception of the hotel site (between Thirteenth and Fifteenth Streets and Hermosa Avenue and the Strand). This development shall conform to the 45 ft. height limit with the exception of the nine (9) foot mansard roof. The mansard roof will be used to screen from public view elevator penthouses and other equipment necessary to operate the building as permitted in Section 1201 of the City Code. Additionally, the development will include buildings and parking structures which may contain up to five (5) stories." Even if the Specific Plan Area were repealed, the City would still have to either amend or comply with the above stated policies. To amend these policies would require approval by the Coastal Commission. The Commission in some instances may not be willing to allow changing policy, particularly if it would be contrary to their goals and objectives. General Plan/Land Use Plan (LUP) (Map 2 attached) The subject Specific Plan Area was adopted and submitted to the Coastal Commission as an amendment to the City's certified General Plan/Land Use. Plan. If the City were to repeal the Specific Plan Area, it would be necessary to request an amendment to the certified General Plan/Land Use Plan from the Coastal Commission. (Refer to attached Ordinance 84-751 for Specific Plan Area details.) The underlying General Plan/Land Use Plan designation for the subject property is part commerial recreation and part general commercial. The City owned portion abutting the Strand is commercial recreation. It should be noted that the commercial recreation designation corresponds to the Local Coastal Program policies noted above. Existing Land Use (Map 3 attached) The Specific Plan Area consists 37 lots, on which a variety of uses exist -- commercial, office, multiple family residential, single family residential and public parking. The residential uses are considered nonconforming under both the Specific Plan Area and C-2 zoning. Refer to attached map #3 for location of existing uses. Proposed Use of Subject Property• At this time, it is uncertain as to what the final use of the subject property will be. Several suggestions for the City owned portions along the Strand have been made by City Council members public park, residential development, highest and best use, trade for railway property, and sell City owned portion are generally the suggestions which have recently been made. Further, the idea that a hotel may be constructed on the property is still somewhat viable. Overview When considering the repeal of the Specific Plan Area, all the above noted factors should be considered. As it is noted, just repealing the Specific Plan Area will not resolve this matter completely in any direction. It will also be necessary to amend the Local Coastal Program and General Plan/Land Use Plan and obtain Coastal Commission approval for those amendments; in that regard, what those amendments should be needs to be determined. Amendments that do not further the goals of the Coastal Commission may not be acceptable to the commission. The commission (staff) should, therefore, be consulted. Once it is determined what the Local Coastal Program and General Plan/Land Use Plan amendments should be, and what ultimately the use of the subject property should be, then, those changes in -2o- conjunction with the repeal of the Specific Plan Area could be resolved at one time, and reviewed and approved by the Coastal Commission at one time. It may be discovered that instead of repealing the Specific Plan Area it may be wiser to amend it. Resolving this matter comprehensively instead of "piece meal" will be more efficient and probably more palatable to the Coastal Commission. Michael Schubach Planning Director J I 2, 2 W • 1 is i R-3 MAP 1 r•J3�7� MANHATTAN R-3 R-3 o sV( R-3' \1 H ERMOSA 1: H .as 31\C-2 r i R-3 .1 a• I I E C-2 2 C-2 R -P .. C-2 Of !1►• STRANO EXISTING ZONING -2z- LEGEND 2z LEGEND . C-2 R -2B R-3 R -P C-2 e% 1 GENERAL COMMERCIAL LIMITED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL PROFESSIONAL c MAP 2 /2 o4r. „ 741 r 7. .#747 -# A or#,. 4.. Alwr ir Akkg4 • • Sit QAark1D • • • • • • • • • • ♦•" • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • •• • • • • • • •"•"•_•_• • • • • •-•"••••••••••L • • • ••'• • •i'• • •••• •• ° • ••• •••• • ••••`• • •••-•••••••• • • •• - LEGEND GENERAL COMMERCIAL K)*(1 COMMERCIAL RECREATION MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL \ \ y (14-25 du/ac) HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (26- 33 du/ac) LAND USE ELEMENT -GENERAL- PLAN -z3- MAP 3 MILD i111111M711111111f11•1 !Milaaaaal =men Pit 11h1111M M• TIME-/Mah:411REMMIll --VNI....i1M1111•111111M11111111M5 HIMMIIMIIIMMIZINIONEMI I *Ma 111G Iran WYE aw-warr...z.ammesawi ..ilmaism um imsonaism/ I INAPAIroiXiMION II IN I N • 01 1111=1111111 11141W4Y/CiardMI MO NI I NIMEAF.S.S.MMI111.1•1111 11131111M111W1 MI 111111r-11 O 1111,1116 seal MI MIONI MI14111;11P_Alr....11 I INIW./t.IMIONIM •I 11111.--..11111MMEMM.m.* MKS "`I! 2.1. LEGEND 0 NUMBER OF STORIES ® PARKING I2 COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL/OFF10E MF RESIDENTIAL EXISTING LAND USE I MMINME11:11111 IIMMINIMIN11111 :00...._ SF RESIDENTIAL PUBLIC PARKING LOT VACANT . • . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 88-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE ATTACHED ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 84-751 A SPECIFIC PLAN AREA FOR AREA COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE BILTMORE SITE. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 7 & June 21, 1988 and made the following Findings; A. The attached ordinance will help achieve the goals, policies, and programs of the General Plan and Local Coastal Program; B. The amended ordinance will more adequately regulate the use of the subject property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby recommend approval of the attached ordinance amending ordinance 84-751 a Specific Plan Area between 15th and 13th Street, and the Strand and Hermosa Avenue. VOTE: AYES: Comms.DeBellis,Ingell,Peirce,Rue,Chmn.Compton NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 88-47 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of June 21, 1988. Gerald Compton, Chairman Michael Schubach, Secretary Date T/persbilt ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA WITH THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN AND LOCAL COASTAL A SPECIFIC PLAN TO REGULATE DEVELOPMENT GENERALLY DOWNTOWN AREA BETWEEN 15TH AND 13TH STREETS AND THE AND HERMOSA AVENUE ARTICLE 9.6, CHAPTER 1, SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 1 Section 9.611. Authority This Specific Plan is an instrument for implement- ing the•Local Coastal Plan ("LCP") and General Plan of the City, pursuant to Article 8, Chapter 3 of the State Planning and Zoning Law (Cal. Gov't. Code §§65450 et seg.). Section 9.612. Location This Specific Plan regulates the Biltmore Site and adjacent lots (the "Subject Property") bounded on the west by the Strand, partially bounded on the north by Fifteenth Street, partially bounded on the east by Hermosa Avenue and on the south by Thirteenth Street as described in the Basic Concept Drawings attached hereto as Exhibit "A." Section 9.613. Area Description The Subject Property encompasses 2.99 acres of topographically flat land, consisting of 2.33 acres of vacant land and .66 acres upon which one and two story residential/ commercial buildings now exist. The Subject Property is located near the Central Business District ("CBD") and adja- cent to the Strand providing an opportunity for commercial/' recreational development that could contribute significantly to the economy of the City and the revitalization of the commercial district. Section 9.614. Basic Concept Drawings The Basic Concept Drawings attached hereto as Exhibit "A" depict the boundaries of the Subject Property, the location of the Project and the alterations proposed to existing streets. Exhibit "A" also indicates the basic design concept for the Project incorporating the objectives, policies, standards and regulations herein. Section 9.615. Purpose The purpose of this Specific Plan is to set forth design principles and development standards for a hotel, conference center, parking facilities, public park and other collateral uses (the "Project") that will enhance the commer- cial and recreational potential of the Subject Property while achieving the goals, policies, and objectives articulated in the General Plan and the LCP. This Specific Plan is adopted to: (a) Establish objectives, policies, regulations, development standards, and review criteria for the Project on the Subject Property; • (b) Preserve the unique coastal character of the area and assure that development of the Subject Property • will comply with California Coastal Act policies, promote local economic stability, and meet the needs of local resi- dents and beach visitors; and (c) Implement the goals, objectives, and policies identified in the LCP portion of the General Plan including: • (1) Provide access and recreational oppor- tunities to local residents and beach visitors during the day and evening; • (2) Promote beach and,recreational facili- ties related to commercial development by encouraging commer- cial recreational uses; (3) Construct parkettes along. the Strand; (4) Preserve and enhance coastal overviews and key vistas; • ing open (5) space; 'Preserve and enhance the City's remain-• (6) Encourage coastal related commercial uses of the downtown area; •, (7) Develop design standards for development of the Biltmore Site in keeping with the scale and character of the area; (8) Maintain the existing commercial - recreational orientation of the downtown area; and (9) Realize the Subject Property's potential financial contribution to the City. 27- Section 9.616. Specific Plan Development Objectives Proper development of the Subject Property is criti- cal to the economic and environmental future of the City, therefore, the major objectives of:this Specific Plan are to: (a) Assure the development of the Project in a manner consistent with the Hermosa Beach City Code ("HBCC") and the scale and location of the Subject Property; (b) Assure coastal access foi• visitors and residents; • (c) Assure adequate parking; (d) Minimize adverse impacts of the Project on neighboring residential uses, especially as they relate to traffic, noise and visual effects; (e) Establish a long range and continuing source of revenue•for the City; (f) Facilitate the safe and convenient flow of traffic in the area; and (g) Provide for permitted uses which are comple- mentary to the Project use and to the City's CBD. Section 9.617. Area Development Policies To effectively achieve the foregoing objectives, the following policies shall be applied to the design and construction of the Project: (a) Project unity and identity shall be achieved through the careful siting of building and parking areas, the development of an effective circulation system, the coordi- nation and control of building design, landscaping, lighting, signing, and similar features. (b) The design and control of pedestrian and vehicular circulation shall provide safe and convenient access to the Project. (c) The standards of development set forth in Section 9.622 below shall be applied to realize the unique potential of the area and to provide for a high quality Project, compatible with commercial uses while maintaining a desirable environment for surrounding residents. Maximum flexibility, consistent with the goals, objectives and policies —28— expressed herein, shall be allowed to encourage imaginative design and development. Section 9.618. Permitted Uses (a) Hotel; (b) Conference Center facility; (c) Parking facilities; (d) Compatible Uses: (1) Food related: A. Restaurant, excluding drive-ins; B. Delicatessen; C. On-site alcoholic beverage sales, including bars and cocktail lounges, provided such uses are a part of a bona fide eating place or hotel (subject to issuance of a Conditional Use Permit ("C.U.P.")); (2) Entertainment and recreation related (subject to issuance of.a C.U.P.): (3) A. Dancing; B. Live entertainment; C. Amplified and recorded music; D. Audio/visual entertainment; E. Health and fitness facility; Service related: A. Automotive rental agency (excluding repair, servicing and storage of not more than three rental vehicles); cleaning; B. Apparel repair, alteration and C. Barber and beauty shop; D. Shoe repair and polishing; E. Ticket sales agency; F. Travel agency; (4) Retail related: A. Apparel shop; B. Art gallery; C. Bookstore; D. Camera shop; E. Candy, nut and confectionary shop; F. Cigar store; G. Drugstore; H. Florist; I. Greeting card shop; J. Jewelry shop;' K. Liquor and food shop; L. Specialty gift shop; M. Stationery store; (e) Other uses not permitted above may be deter- mined by the Planning Commission to be permitted uses if they meet the following criteria: z , (1) The proposed use will not create circum- stances, effects or conditions which are undesirable, more intensive or substantially different than the other uses permitted herein. Factors to consider include traffic, hours of operation, equipment, and the nature of the use; (2) The proposed use will be compatible with the uses permitted herein; (3) The proposed use is similar in scope, purpose, and operation to the uses permitted herein; (4) The proposed use will promote the objec- tives stated herein; -30.- (5) The proposed use is not otherwise prohibited. Section 9.619. Prohibited Uses All uses are prohibited unless provided for and authorized herein. Under no circumstances shall the follow- ing uses be permitted as principal or accessory uses: (a) Residential dwellings, including trailer and mobile home parks; (b) Churches, synagogues, temples and other uses primarily devoted to religious worship; (c) Educational institutions; (d) Drive-in restaurants; (e) Billboards; •(f) Hospitals, sanitariums, homes for the aged and other similar uses. Section 9.620. Use Approvals No use requiring a C.U.P. as. provided for in HBCC,. Appendix A -Zoning, Sections 1403-1414 shall be established except after the issuance of such permit. Section 9.621. Development Approval • The Project as described herein and in the Develop- ment Agreement and Ground Lease submitted to the City Council at their Regular Meeting on March 12, 1985 including all exhibits thereto, is hereby approved. Upon the filing of a completed application(s) for a building permit in accordance with the City's procedures for such applications, and pro- vided such application(s) complies with (i) the Development Agreement and (ii) the standards set forth below, a building permit(s) shall issue. Such compliance will be determined by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. Section 9.622. Subject Property Development Standards To achieve the foregoing objectives, the following standards shall be applied to the development of the Project on the Subject Property: - 3 j -- (a) Intensity. Development of the Subject Property shall comply with the following and the standards of this Section may only be changed by a vote of the People: (1) The above grade lot coverage of the Project shall not exceed 56% of the Subject Property (a variation of 2% shall be permitted); 250; exceed an more than exceed 39 (2) The number of guest rooms shall not exceed (3) The Conference Center facility shall not area of 7,000 square feet. (b) Building Height. The Project shall have no four (4) stories and the building height shall not feet. (c) Parking. The Project shall provide not less than 420 subterranean parking spaces. Provision for striping, parking for the physically handicapped, compact spaces, stall design, tandem, turning radii and similar standards shall be as specified in HBCC Appendix A - Zoning, Section 1163 or in a C.U.P. (d) Open Space. As indicated on Exhibit "A," the Project shall preserve and enhance -open space by providing and maintaining: (1) A plaza facing the Strand;. (2) An approximately 1/2 acre park for gen- eral public use. To the extent permitted by law, no future non -park use may be made of the surface of the park -designated area of the Subject property unless and until this Specific' Plan is amended by the voters of Hermosa Beach. (e) Architectural Considerations. (1) General Requirements. The architectural design shall coordinate the Project building materials, colors and textures, roof and signs to achieve an integrated appear- ance for all facades; (2) Roof. The roof shall be flat and covered with sand -colored pebbles; mirrored glass (3) Windows. The use of chrome -colored or shall be prohibited. (f) Equipment. Air conditioners, duct work and similar equipment shall not be located on the roof of the building and shall be screened from public view. (g) Circulation. (1) Fifteenth Court shall be made one-way eastbound to ensure a circular flow of traffic for service vehicles; (2) There shall be no public pedestrian ingress from 15th Street; (3) There shall be no public pedestrian_ingress 'from Beach Drive between 15th Street and 15th Court. (h) Landscaping. Landscaping shall be complemen- . tary to the Subject Property's coastal location. (i) Signs. The signs on the hotel shall not exceed that currently permitted by the HBCC. Signs shall be allowed as follows: (1) A monument sign not to exceed eight feet in height shall be permitted on the Subject Property adjacent to Hermosa. Avenue; (2) Four temporary construction signs not to • exceed 200 square feet shall be permitted on the site during construction. Total construction sign square • footage shall not exceed 800 square feet; • • (3) Such additional square footage of signage. allowed by the HBCC which may be placed at any point upon any of the facades of the Project Improvements. (4) All signs shall be reviewed by the Plan- ning Director for compliance with HBCC Section 28-Al2. (j) Utilities. All utilities shall be underground. (k) Sprinklered Building. The Project, including all structures, will be sprinklered. Said installation will be in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code, 1982 edition and the National Fire Protection Association Pamphlet No. 13, 1975 edition. (1) Trash Storage. Trash storage areas shall be screened from the view of neighboring residential uses and shall be conveniently located for service vehicles. Enclos- ures shall be constructed out of the same material as the building. The location and screening of the area shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. (m) Loading Areas. Loading, unloading and service activity areas shall be screened to minimize the view from and noise to neighboring residential uses and located for convenient use by service vehicles. (n) Noise Buffering. To minimize noise to neigh- boring residential uses, the ground floor windows facing 15th Street shall be non-operable and hotel rooms with oper- able windows facing 15th Street shall not be used as hospi- tality suites. (o) Site Design. (1) Open and landscaped areas shall be pro- vided around the building and shall highlight primary entrances; (2) Parking shall be located to provide safe and convenient access to uses and shall contribute to an overall circulation pattern. Section 9.623. Public Transit The developer shall institute an airport shuttle for hotel guests. Section 9.624. Bicycle•Parking The developer shall provide not less than twenty permanently mounted bicycle parking stalls, at a location to• be approved by the Planning Director. Section 9.625. Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect pursuant to Cal. Elec. Code §4013. Section 9.626. Amendment This ordinance may be amended by the City Council. after holding public hearings as required by the HBCC and the Cal. Gov't Code, or by the voters of the City. Section 9.627. Public Financing Public financing measures necessary to carry out the Project are described in the Development Agreement and Lease which are both approved concurrently herewith. Section 9.628. Severability If any part or provision of this Specific Plan, or any application thereof, is held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision or applica- tion will not be deemed valid, except to the extent permitted by law, but all other provisions or applications shall con- tinue in full force and effect. . I r • _•. 1 2 3 4 5 -6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 EXHIBIT " H " ,, • ORDINANC( _:•. 4-751 AN ORDIN SCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH WHICH ADOPTS A SPECIFIC PLAN TO REGULATE DEVELOPMENT IN THE DOWNTOWN 'AREA BETWEEN 15TH AND 13TH STREETS AND THE STRAND AND HERMOSA AVENUE AS INDICATED ON EXHIBIT 1 .MAP AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT 2. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing on April 12, and • April 19, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Council hald a public hearing on June 12; '1984;. and WHEREAS, implementation of the Specific Plan described herein will further the goals of.the City's General Plan and Local Coastal Plan; and WHEREAS, the City desires to achieve a systematic execution of the goals and policies of the General Plan in this downtown area which can only bye achieved through detailed regulations and conditions; and WHEREAS, the 'City desires to only specifically regulate that area indicated on • Exhibit 1 and 2; NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa does hereby ordain: Section 1. A hotel/convention center complex built pursuant to this specific plan Will accomplish the following General Plan policies: a) Land Use Element The designation of commercial/recreation which meets the needs of local residents and beach visitors. b) Urban Design Element 19 Upgrade the visual character of the area, convert under-utilized street space to- ped - 20 estrian-oriented activity areas and other public uses, address building scale and form 21 and the revitalization of the business district 22 23 Provide for improved pedestrian circulation and opportunities for landscaping. P- o• 24 d) Parking c) Transportation and Circulation Element • 25 • Provide parking necessary for the project. as well as additional parking to meet future 26 demands. 27 e) Economic Element 23 Revitalize commercial district, provide economic stability, provide policy. for future C . 1 II commercial growth. 2 II Section 2. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1) • The development standards and uses for the Specific Plan area as identi- fied in Exhibit 1 shall be the following:- the ollowing:the same as those for the C-2 zone described in Section 800-C, 801, 803, 804, and 805. 2) Section 802 regulate the height of 45' but an exception shall be made to the story limit. Up to = five- (5) : '. ;' stories shall be allowed. Section 3. • Public streets may be altered to accommodate the project in a manner consistent with the project as finally approved by the ity. Section 4. The local Coastal Plan shall be amended to .included this Specific Plan. Section 5. That a development agreement and appropriate Conditional Use permit be enacted pursuant to this Specific Plan. Section 6. That any project approved pursuant to this Specific Plan shall comply • with the following conditions: a. that the additional levels of parking be constructed on Lot C (a fifth level at 36') and on Lot B (a fourth level) if economically feasible for City/VPD to build. The parking spaces to be built on Lot C and Lot B will be sufficient to accommodate the general public, conference center, 19 and: hotel demand, however any future development in the downtown area 20 will require additional parking. There is an in -lieu fee provision within 1 21 • the VPD which allows new development to purchase spaces from the VPD 22 rather than provide them on site. However if additional levels are built 23 24 on Lot C and B, then those spaces could accommodate new development b. that realignment of loading dock. be updated on the plans and the trash 25 II storage areas be screened so as to minimize the view from the neigh - 26 27 28 • boring residential uses. c. that 15th Court .be made one-way east bound to ensure a circular flow of traffic for the service vehicles. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 23 r • d. the parking spaces to be developed by the Developer are 390. The total amount ofparking provided for the Project ( Hotel and Conference Center) will meet or exceed the current code requirements of the City by approximately twetty-fourpoitsix peroert(24.6% he Developer anticipates a normal operating parking requirement of two hundred sixty (260) spaces for the Hotel and Conference Center, exclusive of parking provided in the project garage for public parking. To the extent that additional parking is needed for utilization by the project, the developer. agrees to provide shuttle service and/or valet service in order to utilize a new parking structure when built at tlie Communtiy Center or other available parking facilities. As part of the operational plan of the project and as suggested by the EIR, the Developer shall institute a free airport shuttle for hotel guests, provide for bicycle parking and storage, encourage off-site employee parking, and attempt. to utilize bus services and/or off-site parking facilities whenever possible for large functions. The City and the Developer shall jointly agree on the standards by which the • City will manage the Lot C parking garage. e. the parking facilities, of the project may contain up to thirty percent (30%) compact car spaces, i.e. parking spaces which are ; feet 6 inches wide by 15 feet in length. f. in order to buffer the neighboring uses from noise generated by a hotel use, the following conditions are recommended. 1. No public access on 15th Street or Beach Drive between 15th Street and 15th Court will . be part of project. 2. Windows on ground floor which face onto 15th Street will be non-operable. 3. Hotel rooms on north side will not be used as hospitality suites. g. the signage on the hotel project improvements shall not exceed that cur- C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2S • c c G. rently permitted by 'the relevent City Code. The calculation of allowable signage shall be based on the "Building Frontage" of the improvements fronting. on to the Strand on the Leased Property. In addition to the signage provided for above, the Developer shall have the right to place supplemental signage at the following locations and in the following manner: A. 13th Street and Hermosa Avenue: Signage may be located on any or all of the three (3) sides of the parking. garage. The size of • such signage will be calculated under the relevant City Code assuming the parking garage as a separate commercial building, with its "Building Frontage" on 13th Street. The total allowed square footage may be distributed on the three (3) sides of the garage at Hermosa Avenue, at the Developer's discretion. B. Pacific Coast -Highway and Pier Avenue (Community Center): the size and design of such signage will be jointly approved. by the City and the Developer and costs will be shared equally by the • City and the Developer. C. Other Locations: as may be agreed upon by City and the Develop-. er, the costs of such additional signage will be .borne by the De - D. veloper. Reasonable "construction signs" shall be allowed during construc- tion, both on the Strand and at Hermosa Avenue. ORDINANCE 84-751, SECTION 7 shall be.amended as "The project shall not exceed 45 feet in height mansard roof or similar structure and shall Section 1201 of the Zoning Ordinance." follows: including any comply with • • • • t./.i•:._ • • •• C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • Section 8. Section 9. ATTEST:,74' �CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FO 1: �v 0741-- CITY ATTORNEY 61/tiEci DATE That this ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. :that prior to the expiration of fifteen days after the date of its adoption the City Clerk shall cause this ordinane. to be published in the Easy Reader,, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circu- lated in the City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED`'T IS26 DAY OF• June, 1984. 4A7 / • .4/!./J PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, . California. C I, the undersigned, do declare under penalty of perjury that I did on the /..t..,14 day of J2/4/6. , 195 deposit into the United States post:office, first class postage prepaid, a copy of the public notice attached as Exhibit "A" to each and every person attached as Exhibit "B". I warrant that the persons named on Exhibit "B" are all the persons required by applicable law to receive the public notice attached as Exhibit "A". b I understand and agree that it is my responsibility to cause these public notices to be made in an accurate and timely fashion and agree to hold the City harmless against any liability. whatsoever for any defect of said notice or notices. • In the event an action is instituted in a court of com= petent jurisdiction which questions the legality of the public notices, then the City may in'its exclusive discretion suspend all hearings or cause the cessation of any construction or of any use which was permitted as a result of a hearing which was held 'in accordance with the public notice. In the event that the court declares the notice or noticing procedure to be effective, then the City may in its exclusive discretion revoke any permits granted and cause any approvals given pursuant to those public notices to be declared null and void and I agree • on behalf of myself and my heirs, assigns or successors -in -interest to hold the City harmless in connection therewith. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. I. have executed this declaration on this the 41-4 day of . �ttNE , 1988' at Hermosa Beach, California. State •of California ) County of Los Angeles ) SS On this the ap day of me, ki?A-11i- Public, personally appeared proved to me on the basis of sati fact Ty videnc to be the person(s) whose name(s) IS subscri•ed to the within instrument and acknowledged that executed it. WITNESS my hand and offs• i (SEAL)'' -'.--- ,,,,..- -�v-.4 . ne-, 4, .FAL 1, r 1.^"1 ^. PEEK s •. maN PORPORNO/4 r dw. ��c t \t.,%.4'"'` I , . ,_�.:5 COUNTY ' Notary Pub is My Commission Expires Sept. 16, 1988 Yak (name)* u— y (Si nature) (Capacity) 198j before rsign.ed Notary • June 16, 1988 Honorable Mayor and City Council Meeting Members of the City Council June 28, 1988 HEARING TO REVIEW DELINQUENT REFUSE CHARGES FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLACING SAID CHARGES ON THE TAX ROLLS AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RECOMMEENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1) Receive testimony from affected property owners regarding their delinquent refuse bills. 2) Adopt the attached resolution authorizing and directing the county assessor to include delinquent refuse charges, which remain ten days following this hearing, as A special assessment to be collected at the same time and in the same manner as county taxes. BACKGROUND This hearing is required pursuant to Section 27A-8 of the municipal code before delinquent refuse charges can be included• as a special assessment with the tax bill. ANALYSIS The attached listing of properties constitutes those that Browning Ferris Industries reports were delinquent with refuse payments as of April 30, 1988. Notices were sent to affected property owners advising them of the opportunity to appear before the Administrative Appeals Board to dispute unpaid charges at a meeting held on June 15, 1988. The attached listing represents those properties with delinquent charges remaining following that meeting. The Administrative Ap- peals Board recommends that the properties remaining on the list 9 have the delinquent charges added to the tax bill as a special assessment. Notices were sent to the property owners on the attached list advising them of the opportunity to appear before the City Coun- cil at this meeting to dispute the delinquent charges. The attached resolution directs the county assessor to place delinquent refuse charges on the tax bill as a special assess- ment. Exhibit "A" of the attached resolution will be modified by the Director of Building and Safety to delete any delinquent re- fuse charges which are paid within ten days following this hear- ing as provided for by Section 27A -8(a)(6) of the municipal code. Concur: Kevin B. Northcaft City Manager 2 Respectfully submitted, William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16' 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY ASSESSOR TO INCLUDE DELINQUENT REFUSE BILLS AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO BE COLLECTED AT THE SAME TIME AND IN THE SAME MANNER AS COUNTY TAXES. WHEREAS, Section 38790.1 of the California Government Code authorizes cities to collect delinquent refuse bills via a special assessment to be collected with county taxes; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 86-840 which provides for collection of delinquent refuse bills in accordance with California Government Code Section 38790.1; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Ordinance No. 86-840, property owners have ten days from the date of the hearing to pay the delinquent refuse bill to avoid the special assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Each delinquent refuse bill shall be increased by ten dollars ($10.00) to compensate for the administrative costs incurred by collecting delinquent refuse bills via a special assessment. Section 2. The 'list of properties and the amount to be collected, attached as Exhibit "A", shall be forwarded to the county assessor for posting on the tax bill as a special assessment. Exhibit "A" may be modified by the Director of Building & Safety to delete those parcels where delinquent -refuse charges are paid within ten days following the City Council hearing. 2 3 4 5 6 .7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th DAY OF JUNE, 1988 President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 2 EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL # AMOUNT 4188 021 019 $121.36 4183 013 036 71.64 4183 013 032 151.56 4182 018 009 30.82 4185 019 016 40.82 4185 023 054 151.36 4188 011 007 51.64 4184 010 010 50.82 4187 011 034 30.82 .4188 015 046 30.82 4187 008 026 232.72 4187 008 038 71.64 4183 015 002 '71.64 4183 009 018 122.46 4182 008 005 232.72 4182 008.015 113.28 4182 011 023 93.28 4188 010 029 154.92 4187 025 041 113.28 4183 013 034 122.67 4183 013 030 122.67 4183 015 016 151.36 4181 033 008 81.64 4188 008 008 151.36 4185 010 020 30.82 4184 024 027 30.82 4188 006 005 314.08 4183 022 010 4188 026 006 4188 029 045 4188 029 048 4188 029 040 4188 029 039 4188 029 030 4187 022 016 4187 008 021 4186 009 012 4187 028 008 4187 027 014 4161 029 026 4187 019 017 4161 027 035 4185 011 029 4183 003 011 4185 006 018 4185 023 049 4184 :012 001 4185 023 023 4183 024 .010 4182 014 031 4182 026 025 4181 023 008 4181 021 036 4183 002 012 232.72 122.46. 51.64 71.64 113.28 113.28 30.82 151.36 151.36 78.58 71.64 151.36 143.96 127.16 32.74 51.64 122.46 122.46 128.76 122.46 148.42 30.82 30.82 42.96 30.82 72.46 251.12 TOTAL $5,742.22 2 BFI C/O Kim Caldwell P.O. Box 2438 Gardena, CA 90247 (213) 329-4115 RESIDENTIAL ACCOUNT# $AMOUNT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LIEN ACCOUNTS June 15, 1988 PARCEL # SERVICE ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER 10090 $111.36 65540 $61.64 42127 $141.56 8825168 $20.82 8849366 $30.82 4283 $141.36 59261 $41.64 2879066 *40.82 71480 $20.82 Ya ee,e, 8918880 8929333 65649 65664 8936486 38216 65680 8730129 65748 65755 51979 51961 10181 57448 8988958 67496 18465 9033069 9061664 19836Q 4188-021-019 4183-013-036 4183-013-032 4182-018-009 4185-019-016 '4185-023-054 4188-011-007 4184-010-010 4187-011-034 151 ARDMORE 1460 BAYVIEW 1512 BAYVIEW. 2010 BAYVIEW 1563 GOLDEN 1825 HARPER AVE 502 HERMOSA AVE 1919 HILLCREST 1107 LOMA DR #C TROTTER, ELAINE M. CURRIE III, ROBERT F. TROTTER, OSCAR F. JONES, L.H./SORHIA M. WOLF, RUSSELL J. PENUELA, MARGARITA STEPAKIS, OLYMPIA COLEMAN, CHARLES M., KEEGAN, EARL $20.82 $222.72 $61.64 $61.64 $112.46 $222.72 $103.28 $83.28 $144.92 $103.28 $112.67 $112.67 $141.36 $71.64 $141.36 $20.82 $20.82 $304.08 $222.72 $112.46 $51.64 8558520 $41.64 46516 $61.64 58057 $103.28 8739252 $103.28 58933 $20.82. 8612863 •$141.36 8612970 $141.36 4188-015-046 4187-008-026 4187-008-038 4183-015-002 4183-009-018 4182-008-005 4182-008-015 4182-011-023 4188-010-029 4187-025-041 4183-013-034 4183-013-030 4183-015-016 4181-033-008 4188-008-008 4185-010-020 4184-024-027 4188-006-005 4183-022-010 4188-026-006 4t86 -e2/ e44 4188-029-045 4188-029-048 4188-029-040 4188-029-039 4188-029-030 4187-022-016 4187-008-021 152 816 844 1730 1825 1951 2055 2405 527 706 1509 1515 1819 132 316 1531 2019 336 1793 541 605 615 633 636 650 736 208 221 LYNDON MANHATTAN MANHATTAN MANHATTAN MANHATTAN MANHATTAN MANHATTAN MANHATTAN AVE AVE AVE AVE AVE AVE AVE MQNTEREY BLVD MONTEREY BLVD MONTEREY BLVD MONTEREY BLVD MONTEREY BLVD NEPTUNE PALM DR PROSPECT AVE SPRINGFIELD THE STRAND VALLEY PK 3 ST 3 3T 3 ST 3 ST 4 ST 4 ST 4 ST 8 ST 8 ST MARINO, RICHARD A. CRIST, JOHN PETTYJOHN, CAROL L. ESCALANTE, MICHAEL F. MCALPIN, MARGARET K. KELLY, KAROLYN LOPILATO, ANTHONY J. HERRIOT, PAUL 8. HUGHES, KENNETH S. BRIGGS, KATHLEEN G. CURRIE III, ROBERT F. CURRIE III, ROBERT F. TROTTER, OSCAR F. OUAGLETTI, MICHAEL J. BROCKSCHMIDT, EDWARD H. SMITH, MARVIN M. WITTER, STEWART PETTYJOHN, CAROL L. AKERLUND, FREDERICK E. MCKEOWN, KENT IN C110, JEANN BERRIDGE, ROBERT A. BERRIDGE, ROBERT A. BERRIDGE, ROBERT A. BERRIDGE, ROBERT A. ACOSTA, NELSON CURRIE III, ROBERT F. CURRIE III, ROBERT F. ACCOUNT# $AMOUNT Page 2 PARCEL # SERVICE ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER 62588 5470 44644 39479 +79192 42412 35188 8665994 8667883 17046 51680 8700866 45153 71126 73122 64923 $68.58 $61.64 $141.36 $133.96 $24.40 $117.16 $22.74 $41.64 $112.46 $112.46 $118.76 $112.46 $138.42 $20.82 $20.82 $32.96 4186-009-012 4187-028-008 4187-027-014 4161-029-026 4107 011 020 4187-019-017 4161-027-035 4185-011-029 4183-003-011 4185-006-018 4185-023-049 4184-012-001 4185-023-023 4183-024-010 4182-014-031 4182-026-025 835 722 702 1140 -33.3 403 1118 930 68 825 1252 848 1218 585 312 530 8 ST 9 ST 10 ST 10 ST 11 OT 11 ST 11 13 14 15 17 19 19 20 25 25 ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST RADIS, BRIAN K. HAAS JR., CLARENCE ERICKSON, DIANE L. TOWER, BARBARA NAMANY, CTAPILCY BRIGGS, KATHLEEN G. . RODDA, JO -ANN VERDUZCO, SHARON M. MOLINA, FRANK BIJAKIIAN, KRIKOR EMORY, WALLACE L. HENDERSON, PAMELA N. SULLIVAN, DONALD L. MISCIONE, MARK A. TROTTER, ELAINE M. SHAW, JOHN 8754210 8641904 $20.82 4181-023-008 229 27 ST ' $62.46 4181-021-036 347 30 PL TOTAL $5,098.78 COMMERCIAL 4026308 $241.12 4183-002-012 59 PIER AVE TOTAL $241.12 GRAND TOTAL $5,339.90 WOOD, LARRY E. JOHNSON, JAY P. EGERER, JOSEPH K. Sec. 27A-8. Mandatory collection fee. (a) In order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the city, the charges (including bin rental where applicable) for collection of garbage, rubbish and other refuse shall be billed in advance either by the city or its franchisee to each owner(s) of record of all premises where refuse is produced or generated. Said billing shall be in the manner and frequency as established by the city either by resolution or by contract with its franchisee. The city may adopt such billing and collection procedures as are deemed necessary and appropriate. (1) If an owner of record fails to pay a service bill by the date set by the city council by resolution establishing such pro- cedures or by contrast with its authorized franchisee, the .... owner of record will be sent a notification of such delin- quency which shall include a penalty fine of ten dollars ($10.00), and the owner of record shall be assessed an additional ten dollars ($10.00) penalty fine for every suc- ceeding thirty (30) days of delinquency. Said notification • shall be sent by the franchisee. • • . (2) Each successive billing period established above shall in- clude the accumulated unpaid charges on a delinquent account for collection and disposal of refuse, as well as the accumulated penalties. Those owners of record who receive such notice shall not invalidate any action taken by the franchisee or city under this section. - (3) Should the owner of record fail or refuse to pay the fee assessed for collection of garbage, rubbish or other refuse as provided in this section, the individual in charge of such collection shall advise the city manager of such refusal. The failure to pay would, except for the provisions hereof, Supp. No. 9-86 332.34 1� C • § 27A-8 SANITATION, GARBAGE AND REFUSE 4 27A-8 result in the noncollection of garbage, rubbish or. other • refuse, which condition the council determines and declares would be a threat to the public health, safety and welfare and which condition, if permitted to exist, is declared to be a public nuisance. In the event of nonpayment, the city manager shall direct the contractor or franchisee to con- tinue to provide service, and the past -due billings; includ- ing penalties and expenses and charges for collecting such billings, shall be assessed against the property as provided in this section. The franchisee shall continue to collect garbage, rubbish and refuse in cases of nonpayment when directed to do so by the city manager. - (4) All costs incurred in collection of unpaid charges shall be recoverable by the city and charged against •the property from which the garbage, rubbish or refuse was collected. (5) The city manager shall direct a notice to the property owner where unpaid charges are pending, at the address shown on the latest tax roll, setting a date, time and place for a hearing before the administrative appeals board of the city at which the board shall review all unpaid charges and make a recommendation to the city council whether such charges should be charged against the property. The city manager shall thereafter direct a notice to the own- er(s) of record where unpaid charges are pending, setting a date, time and place for a public hearing before the city council at which the administrative appeals board's rec-. ommendation shall be considered and all unpaid charges shall be reviewed. Any property owners shall have the right to appear at the public hearings before the adminis- trative appeals board and before the city council. ' (6) At the conclusion of its public hearing, the city council shall determine and approve, as an assessment against the property, all past -due billings and penalties due to the date of said hearing, together with the costs incurred in collect- ing the unpaid charges. If the total assessment determined and approved by the council is not paid within ten (10) days after the determination by the. council, the delinquent account shall be submitted to the county assessor for in - Supp. No. 9-86 • 332.35 • • • .... - .. ... .. .. . — INNIZEIN=MlanaLf 7=.-.7v • .. . ...... ..Yr .M...K:. s t ...r•N..!9-• A+a/l9.-.e•.f►'. 4 27A-8 -- HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE 4 27A-8 clusion as a special assessment against the parcel. The assessment shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as county taxes are collected and shall be • subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in case of delinquency as provided for ordinary county taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection and en- forcement of county taxes shall be applicable to such spe- cial assessment. May 17, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 28, 1988 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING RESOLUTION 84-4749, AND AMENDING SECTION 8, PARAGRAPHS (a), (b), (c), and (d) OF RESOLUTION 82-4524, INCREASING THE FEE FOR ANNUAL PARKING PERMITS FROM $20.00 TO $25.00. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution amending Section 8, Paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of Resolution 82-4524, increasing the fee for Annual Permits from $20.00 to $25.00 (section (d), to remain as adopted in Resolution 84-4749, at $5.00, see attached Resolution 84-4749) Background: During the 1984-85 Budget Hearing, Council directed staff to increase the Residential Parking Permit fee, in light of the recommendations made in the MSI report. There has been no increase in the Residential Parking Permit since. Analysis: Since the passage of the amended resolution in 1984, increasing the fees to $20.00, the City has implemented the use of a computer program to generate a renewal system via the mail. This program grew out of requests from the public, to provide some method of obtaining the permits, without subjecting themselves to the long lines and time consumming process of coming in person to purchase the permits. Once a resident has purchased an annual Resident Permit, an account is created in their name. The account contains the type and number of permits purchased, the corresponding license number(s) and permit numbers, and the number of the Guest permit, if purchased. The account remains open, unless a permit is not purchased the subsequent year. Each year, renewal forms, containing the account information, are mailed to all currently open accounts. The resident may choose to purchase their permits by (1) returning the renewal form and monies, via the mail, in which case the permits will be returned by mail, or (2) come in person to obtain their permits. Over the period of this program, it is estimated that 457.-507 of the 6,000-8,000 renewals mailed out each year, are returned through the mail for processing. 10 The implementation and operation of this renewal program represents an additional cost factor to the city in postage, printing materials, envelopes, the computer program, and forms. The projected increase in revenue, if implemented as recommended, will range between $30,000 and $35,000 for the fiscal year 1988-89. This projection is conservative, since we are unable to determine what, if any, impact the increase in cost will have on the number of permits sold. Staff is aware there a concern, expressed by Councilwoman Williams, pertaining to the criteria currently used in the issuance of the annual parking permits. During the next six months, this department will be looking at alternatives regarding the number of permits issued to each household and the method by which those permits are issued, in order to eliminate possible abuses. Alternatives: 1. Effect no change in the cost of the permits, thereby continuing to subsidize the cost of the renewal, in part. 2. Increase the permit price by a lesser or greater amount. CONCUR: Jo Noon, Director Kevin B. Norahcraft, City Manager Respectfully submitted, Joan Noon, Director by c. l Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA REPEALING RESOLUTION 84-4749 AND AMENDING SECTION 8, PARAGRAPHS (a), (b), (c), and (d) OF RESOLUTION 82-4524, INCREASING THE FEE FOR ANNUAL PARKING PERMITS FROM $20.00, TO $25.00. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Section 8: Fees for Issuance of Resident Permits and Resident Guest Permits; (a) Resident Parking Permit to be affixed to resident's vehicle: (b) One non-attached Guest Parking Permit per address may be purchased by any person showing proof of current residence or ownership of residential property in the designated Impacted Parking Area: (c) Affixed Resident Permits may be issued as specified in Section 4 as amended, supra, for a fee of: (d) Day Permits: Section 2. That this Resolution shall repeal Resolution 84-4749. $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $ 5.00 Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause same to be entered among the original Resolutions of said 1 City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of June , 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 JUSTIFICATION OF COST REASONABLY BORNE The preferential parking area (impact zone) is approximately 33% or one-third of the entire city (see attached map). It therefore, requires at least one-third of the overall services provided by Parking Enforcement. This includes the issuance of parking permits, ticketing of illegally parked cars, collection of parking tickets, reporting of unpaid tickets to other enforcement agencies and meter maintenance, repair and collection, etc., as well as all other related costs. It is then reasonable to conclude that at least one-third of the Parking Enforcement Budget is dedicated to the preferential parking area. Parking Enforcement Budget 1988/89 - $803,143 X 33% (Preferential Parking Area) = $265,037 It is true that all of the enforcement effort is not directly related to preferential parking. There are four types of violations issued in the area, they are as follows; Meter violation - 50% Sweeper violation - 20% No stopping, standing or parking - 10% Time limit parking - 30% Both meter and time limit parking violations are directly influenced by permit parking. This represents 80%. Preferential Parking Area Costs - $265,037 X 80% = $212,029 The City issues approximately 8500 annual parking permits. $212,029 divided by 8500 = $24.94 unit cost Benefit to permit holder a) Preferential parking privileges not subjected to one hour parking restriction or having to pay the meter. b) Enforcement to maximize the availability and turnover of parking spaces. Cost to permit holder Currently at $20.00 per annum - 5.5 cents per day Recommended increase to $25.00 per annum - 7 cents per day Cost to non -permit holder $5.00 per day for daily parking permit or 25 cents per half hour for metered parking. • • PROGRAM •BOUNDARIES, CITY OF HERMOSABEACH Z.:A.LIIIP.01111-111A *la SCAM 1101010400 Far • 64 Iri0:1 .1/•1f.1 • t .2.• """''''..47*".1 If .11 _.._ -.- - -:, ti ...... .• • ; \ i ,) .. .-1.-.- r till -/ C'..- .....:r...e. 1 ‘V ..., ... • • .11 rt .......,, ,, • ...-- 'AI\ /..• .. ....: 7..r...- • - ..... ,..". 1 r....._.„.........._ 1.......,..„ .. 11010, 4 .ti (... AP.I.E........"‘A 1 1. .... ,i.I. i 0•01 iri ITY-'itr.T'..:."2.. tti: i•..... .....'---- .-......,....._ -.... ---... ..... ----. 11 . -...... ... q IL rtir-7:74 - • ..ot • W. 1 it 00 9 .•• .:.,, iiv• / /1 II , , ..i...• • ' .4„....., ,! ! . ...... ,•• . ii t s..... ii 1 :14.. •.. .1e.(Zji:;11"; .. 1‘ II ' 1 t• :‘,...L. ..:• .i, go 1; il i. 1. .11.1i 1 i. 4.1 1 l: ..p ..‘..,• .‘i,.i ; ..t i : I : 1. ! s J rr''1I.I; :Sr•lI)Tj1 ....._.0.0". .•'• =-... ..-•.....,tt---.i1.iT1/.,1. i01 , .•••.•%••1•,••....1.l,.i.•.•..•••..•:. •'•.iI ;r*..1.b0..-..1.•,-.0...-..0 .;!.."0I:i..-• 'i7 .0•7 0. 0 1 "..-• .-.1..L1 ,.. i 1 II Jt_ fj : t' i: 111 ' 1,-7'. ?, • j . l ; .• r.I . i.0I .. i •••••••I.. o‘z 11 L." 7T: • ,••••••• mo••• 081•46. 71. CA....".."." .1 .11 I • ‘10 r , • , • ][1_1111111:14.117ligffeli3r-Z1Irr 111 lid Ill - t "1 ti1ORNINGSZDE.. • • 4 • THE STRIAND .Lo1INR. 6 A 6/98 &EAv .L 5741//c£S MP 7: : Re: „Vclz /*✓ 'vv. v g/41.- A9eZK./i✓6- Pe ON / 55 470A03W Ta f bare_ i .f.-420,4 '1C20 To 2.5" • 6ZLZ/v & P*giti,r-5 e,".410 ,t 64afel/ atsioE,,vr5 FZEE ST /5 ,q / ?, iE., 'Ta Ioi+2x O"✓ Srizzfaz f az- C t0 R6 -W daft 04/A/ , c),5,4/c Ron Felsing 249 27th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 S.✓CC2tiC Y, erq c,. St,W ic5S oe.-7- S v, it viza& May 16, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of May 24, 1988 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE HOURS OF OPERATION FOR CITY HALL OPERATIONS Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the continua- tion of the 4/10 alternative schedule for City Hall operations. Background: In July 1987 the City Council was advised of the intent to ex- plore alternative hours of operation for City Hall offices. This alternative schedule had been requested by the employees repre- sented by the Teamsters Public, Professional, and Medical Em- ployees' Union, Local 911. At the October 13, 1987 meeting the Council was advised of the results of a survey of city service users. That survey concluded that 70% of those citizens responding indicated that they would prefer to have City Hall open for extended hours and that Friday was the least likely day of the week that the largest percentage of respondents would visit City Hall (exhibit A). On October 27, 1987, the City Council approved changing the hours of operation for City Hall to 7:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday for a six month trial period commencing November 30, 1987. In addition to employees working in City Hall offices, alterna- tive schedules have been explored for Police Officers, Police Services Officers, and General Services Officers. These alterna- tive schedules are continuing. Two evaluations have been conducted during this trial period of the alternative schedule. The first evaluation compared sick leave utilization and overtime accrued during the first two months of the trial period with the preceeding two months period and the same time period one year previous. Included in the first evaluation was a survey of the Department Directors. The results of that evaluation and survey supported the continuation of the trial period. Following the first evaluation, the Council directed that telephone access to City Hall was to be made avail- able during all open hours as opposed to not receiving in -coming calls during the first and last hours of the day and from 12:00 to 1:00. The second evaluation compares these same factors (sick and over- time) for the five months just completed under the trial period 11 (December - April) with the preceeding five month period and the same time period one year orevious. Included in this second evaluation are survey results from both the affected employees and users of City Hall offices. EVALUATION: Sick/Overtime The attached charts (exhibits B,C,D) indicate change in the utilizaton of "sick -time" used, and "comp -time" earned for the two comparison the percentage "admin -time" earned periods. Compared to the time period one year previous the net increased cost to the City for the alternative schedule was S488.07 (based on the average salary for employees in the General Employees' Bargaining Unit). Compared to the five month period preceeding the trial period the net increased savings to the City during the alternative schedule was S6,423.98 (based on average salary of employees in the Administrative Employees bargaining Unit and the Management Association). Employee Survey The results of the employee survey are attached (exhibit E). This survey was intended to measure the employees' perception of the impact of the alternative schedule on such factors as: their department's ability to serve the citizens; their impression of the citizen's opinions toward the alternative schedule; and how the employee feels about working the alternative schedule. This survey indicated: 1. Department's efficiency --- 2. Satisfaction with schedule - 3. Impact on daily work 61.4% responded improved 91.0% responded satisified 38.6% responded improved 52.3% responded No impact Citizen Survey A survey was conducted of those persons using City Hall services for the two week period May 2nd through May 12th. Of the 238 respondents 78% indicated that they wanted the current City Hall schedule continued while 9% indicated that they did not want the current hours continued. In response to the question "do you want City Hall to return to the previous hours of operation (Mon. tbru Fri. 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.)?" 677, indicated "NO" while 12% indi- cated "YES". Of those who are Hermosa Beach residents, 80% indi- cated a desire to have the current hours continued. The complete results of the Citizen survey are attached (exhibit F). ANALYSIS: In addition to the positive results of the above evaluation which measured cost to the city, employee perceptions/morale, and citizen input, there are other factors which are improved by this alternative schedule. These factors include: 1. City Hall offices are open an additional 4 hours each week (previously closed from 12:00 - 1:00); 2. Ability to serve citizens before and after their regular work hours as well as during their lunch period; 3. Reduction by 20% the number of vehicle trips for commuting to and from work (see attached letter and article - exhibit G). The South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) will re- quire, under Regulation XV, agencies to submit and implement a trip reduction plan by January 1, 1990 which encourages employees to reduce their driving to from work. If this alternative schedule continues to be beneficial to the City and its em- ployees, it will assist the City in meeting this requirement. The Management Association and the Teamsters' Union will be notified of the City's action following approval by the Council for the continuation of the alternative schedule. R spectfully sub��d Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director CITY MANAGER COMMENT: Concur: Kevin B. Nort craft City Manager The staff recommendation is for an indefinite extension. If approved, the City's right to return to the former schedule on 60 days notice will he maintained. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATE HOURS SURVEY (Based on City Hall public survey conducted August 10 thru September 11, 1987 - Ali jiesoonses) 1) Percentage of respondents preferring extended hour/four dam weeK = 70% A) Average number of 'visits' to City Hall per year = 5.5 visits B) Percentage -of Residents = 55% Percentage of Nonresidents = 3T/. Percentage declining to state = 3% 2) Percentage of respondents preferring current schedule = 17% A) Average number of 'visits" to City Hall per month = 1.6 B) Percentage of Residents = 55%/. Percentage of Nonresidents = 37% Percentage declining to state = 4% 3) Percentage of respondents with no preference = 18< 4) Of those who prefer an extended hour/four-day week, which day of the current five-day schedule are they least likely to use City Hall? A) Monday = 16% B) Tuesday = 8%. C) Wednesday = 15%/. 0) Thursday = 3%/. E) Friday = 294 5) If all seven days of the week were available, which days would the respondent prefer to have open (choosing 4 days) ? A) Monday = 55'% B) Tuesday = 57% C) Wednesday = 59% 0) Thursday = 62'% E) Friday = 37/. F) Saturday = 21% 8) Sunday = 6% aEXHIBI� 6) Percentage of respondents who would like City Hall to be open earlier than 8:00 a.m. A) 6:00 a.m. 8) 6:30 a.m. C) 7:00 a.m. D) 7:30 a.m. = 6% E) No time stated = 42% 7) Percentage of respondents who would like City Hall to be open later than 5:00 p.m. A) 5:30 p.m. = 5% 8) 6:00 p.m. = 22% C) 6:30 p.m. = 7% 0) 7:00 p.m. = 24% E) No time stated = 28% 8) Percentage of respondents who would like City Hall to be open from 12:00 to 1:00 = 47% Percentage of respondents who would not like City Hall to be open from 12:00 to 1:00 = 11% No preference = 32% Not responding = 2/. 2 DEPT. SICK LEAVE USAGE 4/10 PLAN 5 MONTHS AGO 12/87 - 04/88 01/87 - 11/87 6 1 YEAR AGO 12/86 - 04/87 Administration Building/Business Lic. Community Resources Finance General Services Planning Public Works TOTALS 10.00 131.40 33.00 116.00 229.00 0.00 74.00 35.75 173.00 55.00 121.42 169.50 40.00 25.50 593.40 620.17 41.63 200.50 86.00 125.45 226.75 0.00 47.33 727.66 PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN USAGE The following figures indicate the pecentage change in SICK LEAVE USAGE incurred during the start of the 4/10 work period in relation to the same time one year ago and 5 months previous. SICK LEAVE USAGE IN RELATION TO 1 TEAR AGO -18.5% (134.26 HRS) SICK LEAVE USAGE IN RELATION TO 5 MONTHS AGO -4.3% (26.77 HRS) C OVERTIME ACCRUAL ADMIN. TIME EARNED 4/10 PLAN 5 MONTHS AGO 1 YEAR AGO DEPT. 12/87 - 04/88 07/87 - 11/87 12/86 - 04/87 Administration 170.70 359.00 146.58 Building/Business Lic. 69.75 50.75 77.25 Community Resources 178.30 170.00 195.50 Finance 64.25 19.37 30.42 General Services 113.05 286.00 130.55 Planning 59.78 75.75 66.75 Public Works 178.58 211.89 128.15 TOTALS 834.41 1172.76 775.20 NOTE: "Admin" is time accrued beyond an employees normal working hours and is computed on an hour for hour basis. PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN ACCURAL TOTALS The following figures indicate the pecentage change in ADMIN. TIME earned during the 4/10 work period in relation to the same time one year ago and 5 months ago. ADMIN. TIME USAGE ADMIN. TIME USAGE IN RELATION TO 1 YEAR AGO IN RELATION TO 5 MONTHS AGO +87. (59.21 HRS) -29% (338.35 HRS) OVERTIME ACCRUAL COMP. TIME EARNED 4/10 PLAN 5 MONTHS AGO 1 YEAR AGO DEPT. 12/87 - 04/88 07/87 - 11/87 12/86 - 04/87 Administration 9.00 31.88 4.25 Building/Business Lic. 15.75 3.50 37.00 Community Resources 10.00 29.50 2.25 Finance 141.50 85.75 30.29 General Services 68.75 92.50 75.25 Planning 7.50 5.00 1.50 Public Works 50.50 31.00 69.00 TOTALS 303.00 279.13 219.54 NOTE: "Comp" is time accrued beyond an employees normal working hours and is computed at time and one-balf. PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN ACCURAL TOTALS The following figures indicate the pecentage change in comp. time earned during the 4/10 work period in relation to the same time one year ago and 5 months previous: COMP. TIME USAGE IN RELATION TO 1 YEAR AGO +38% (83.46 HRS.) COMP. TIME EARNED IN RELATION TO 5 MONTHS AGO +8.6% (23.87 HRS.) CITY HALL "4/10" WORK SCHEDOLE EMPLOYEE SURVEY PART I In this section, we were interested in how the 4/10 work schedule has impacted BACH DEPARTMENT'S ability to serve citizens. 1) In terms of the current work schedule, what is your opinion of your department's ability to serve citizens ? EXCELLENT 65.9% GOOD 31.8% POOR DON'T KNOW 2.3% 2) Has your department experienced any problems in shceduling lunch hours during the 4/10 work schuedule trial period ? YES 86.4% NO 6.8% DON'T KNOW 6.8% 3) Do you think that there is enough "counter help" available to help citizens during your department s scheduled lunch hours ? YES 93.2% NO 6.8% DON'T KNOW 4) How would you rate your department's efficiency during the 4/10 work schedule ? IMPROVED 61.4% DECREASED NO CHANGE 36.3% NO RESPONSE 2.3% 1 PART II In this section, we attempted to assess employees' impressions about CITIZENS' OPINIONS toward the 4/10 work schedule. Very No Satisified Satisfied Dissatified Opinion 5) What are citizens' re- sponse to City Hall being opened four (4) days of the week 25% 50% 2.3% 18.2% 6) What are citizens' response to City Hall being closed on Fridays ? 9% 47.7% 4.5% 32% 7) What are citizens' opinions regarding access to City Hall facilities during the 4/10 work schedule ? 45.5% 38.6% ---- 13.6% PART III In this section, we tried to survey bow EMPLOYEES FEEL about working a 4/10 work schedule. 8) In general, how "satisfied" are you with the current work schedule ? SATISIFED 91% DISSATISIFED 4.5% NO OPINION 4.5% 9) How bas your workload been impacted by the 4/10 work schedule ? INCREASED WORKLOAD 18.2% DECREASED WORKLOAD 2.3% NO IMPACT 77.2% DON'T KNOW 2.3% 2 10) How has the 4/10 work schedule impact your ability to complete all of your daily work duties ? IMPROVED 38.6% DECLINED 2.2% NO IMPACT 52.3% NO OPINION 4.5% 11) In your opinion, would you recommend the continuation of the 4/10 work schedule ? YES 88.6% NO 11.4% NO OPINION CITY HALL "4/10" SCHEDULE CITIZEN SURVEY - RESULTS/ALL RESPONDENTS t [This report contains the findings of a survey which citizens were requested to complete while seeking assistance at city hall service counters.] In order to assist the City in evaluating the "4/10 work schedule" (open Monday tbru Thrusday, 7 a.m. - 6 p.m., closed on Fridays), we would appreciate that you take a few minutes and complete this questionnaire. INSTRUCTIONS This questionnaire can be completed by placing a check mark in the appropriate answer box. Please check off ONLY ONE BOX. After you have completed, you can give this survey to any employee at the service counter. 1) Is the current City Hall work schedule convenient for you (Mon. thru Thurs., 7 a.m. to 6 p.m.) ? 2) Do you want the current City Hall work schedule continued (Mon. tbru Thurs. 7 a.m. to 6 p.m.) ? YES NO NO OPINION 867. 8% 7% 78% 9% 10% 3) Has it been inconvenient for you to have City Hall closed on Fridays ? 24% 64% 10% 4) Do you want City Hall to return to the previous hours of operation (Mon. thru Fri., 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.) ? 5) Are you a Hermosa Beach resident ? 73% YES 27% NO 127. 677. 14% 6) What is the approximate number of times per year that you utilize City Hall offices ? 34% 1-3 times 237. 4-6 times 9°1 7-9 times 27% 10+ CITY HALL "4/10" SCHEDULE CITIZEN SURVEY - RESULTS/HBRIIOSA RESIDENTS f [This report contains the findings of a survey which citizens were requested to complete while seeking assistance at city ball service counters. These results reflect responses from Hermosa Beach residents only.] In order to assist the City in evaluating the "4/10 work schedule" (open Monday tbru Tbrusday, 7 a.m. - 6 p.m., closed on Fridays), we would appreciate that you take a few minutes and complete this questionnaire. INSTRUCTIONS '1'bis questionnaire can be completed by placing a check mark in the answer box. Please check off ONLY ONE BOX. After you have completed, you can give this survey to any employee service counter. YES NO appropriate at the NO OPINION 1) Is the current City Hall work schedule convenient for you (Mon. thru Thurs., 7 a.m. to 6 p.m.) ? 877. 97. 2) Do you want the current City Hall work schedule continued (Mon. thru Thurs. 7 a.m. to 6 p.m.) ? 80% 9% 3) Has it been inconvenient for you to have City Hall closed on Fridays ? 24% 66% 4) Do you want City Hall to return to the previous hours of operation (Mon. tbru Fri., 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.) ? 11% 71% 5) Are you a Hermosa Beacb resident ? 183 YES [ ] NO 3% 7% 4% 8% 6) Wbat is the approximate number of times per year that you utilize City Hall offices ? 23% 1-3 times 15% 4-6 times 10, 7-9 times 327. 10+ 1011 Second Street Hermosa Beech, CA 90254 May 16, 1988 Mayor and Members of City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council: I understand that the "4-10 plan" you implemented is nearing the end of its six—nth test period. I just wanted to voice my support for City Hall's expanded hours and commend you for being one of the few pities araad willing to try "something new" to improve service to the public. You've opened your doors to more people by inking your hours more convenient to the mmjority of the working public still restricted by the typical 8 to 5 Work schedule. I realise that your primary concern, When evaluating the results of this experiment, must be whether or not such a plan is beneficial to the citizens of the community in which you serve, but I've enclosed for your consideration an article I wrote for my college newspaper which addresses same of the other benefits that I see. 'Thank you. Sincerely, ,d,z4-43-4-42.4-44-fr-41) Blaine Doerfling !?I • Awe. . • • WARHOOP, MAY 12, 1988 ••• • . '• • • .1% t • , : • • Coif-ica.� .moo- , f4/1/i•PPZe0/p M"•1074 � al� ro • ( 6(iD5rP iStA(G Tfl`� arc c7G of +4 �stACcnGG ?-‚ te_C-ScDszAI T S -re7 1- 5 iffonLit SUPPLUNTer rZ� � OR � � k.i INFORMATION 1O%fJ,(• Tl 4e,W, It4J4tv, SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION I 0 arivwd /0a/dt 4de_006 590. /1 -?_s Uel s;� 7—AL_ 1,04/1,e_,.:,./a_ FEE F 4oc.41/5 f ep/e- o t0,0)7- At- eid m'a .c4.ic •:J c.1#; i s uvr t : 774% -pAye,es s4.,c, A -/44e 1_ /WA A' /e-.4 ,i eefz • per- o.) Tw ,4 e4 A// Su/ec. ge- STu 7� r -sec d!F sT zr /4-a ,0144' s\\\O IR • June 6, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 28, 1988 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY PARKING REMOVAL WEST -SIDE, BETWEEN 3:00 P.M. - 7:00 P.M. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council 1. Require a focused study for the west -side PCH parking removal and that this study be included in the on-going Circulation Element study. 2. Appropriate $5,000 from the State Gas Tax Fund balance to the Circulation Element for the provision of including PCH and addressing the environmental impacts identified in the environmental assessment. 3. Adjust the contract cost not to exceed from $70,000 to $75,000. G'KS Background: NOTE: All exhibits referenced in this report are on file in the Office of the City Clerk. At the regular City Council meeting of June 9, 1987 Council took formal action to "direct staff to notify Caltrans by letter that Council will consider doing staff recommendation; studies need to be done; will Caltrans pay for them?" Analysis: The analysis of this report is divided into the following sections: 1. Why is this project being considered? 2. CEQA Requirements for a Focused EIR 3. Actions Taken 4. The Circulation Element 5. Available Alternatives and Costs 6. Fiscal Impact 7. Summary 8. Recommendation 1. Why is this Project Being Considered? This project is being considered because City Council established the following goal at a special Council meeting on October 23, 1986: "To remove parking on Pacific Coast Highway". 1 11 Policy Statement 3 in the General Plan addresses traffic on Pacific Coast Highway; concludes that improved handling of traffic on PCH will reduce neighborhood traffic caused by travelers through our City and calls for parking removal on the west -side of PCH during the hours of 4:15 P.M. to 6:15 P.M. As recommended by the Planning Commission to the City Council, a focused EIR is necessary for this project. 2. CEQA Requirements for a Focused EIR California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines define a focused EIR as an EIR focusing on the effects determined to be significant. Just as an EIR, a focused EIR must include the following: 1. Table of Contents 2. Summary 3. Project Description 4. Environmental Setting 5. Environmental Impact a) Significant Environmental Effects b) Environmental Effects which cannot be avoided if proposal is implemented * c) Mitigation Measures Proposed to Minimize the Significant Effects * d) Alternatives to proposed Action * e) The Relationship between Local Short -Term Uses of Man's Environment and the Maintenance and Enhancement of Long -Term Productivity. * f) Any Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes which would be involved in the proposed Action should it be implemented. * g) The Growth -Inducing Impact of the proposed Action 6. *Effects not found to be significant 7. Organizations and Persons Consulted 8. *Cumulative Impacts * Information not available to date. 3. Actions Taken June 9, 1988: City Council directs (Exhibit A) staff to notify Caltrans. July 23, 1987: Public Works Department completes (Exhibit B) environmental assessment and submits to Planning Department. Planning Department schedules first available environmental staff review meeting (August 20, 1987). August 18, 1987: Public Works Department recommends (Exhibit C) to the Planning Commission that the project be considered for Third Quarter General Plan Amendment. Planning Commission postpones consideration until Fourth Quarter. Formal action taken to "set this item for review of information sometime during late September or early October in preparation for the 1987 Fourth Quarter General Plan Amendment." August 20, 1987: Environmental Staff Review Committee holds hearing (Exhibit D) and recommends to the Planning Commission that a draft Environmental Impact Report be prepared that addresses the potential impacts listed in the Environmental Assessment. Also that all past reports dealing with the removal issue and economic analyses on the effects to businesses be included for Planning Commission and City Council consideration. This is recommended on November 4, 1987. September 18, 1987: Caltrans contacted by staff (Exhibit E) now that scope of work has been better defined by the environmental assessment. In accordance with City Council's direction, Caltrans is asked to fund a traffic study for this project. October 14, 1987: Caltrans replies to staff (Exhibit F) indicating that "since existing studies provide a surplus of justification, Caltrans cannot justify funding additional outside studies". Caltrans' reply included traffic volumes; travel time and speed study, as well as a delay cost study. November 4, 1987: Planning Commission concurs (Exhibit G) with the Environmental Staff Review Committee (August 20, 1987), recommends a focused EIR and that this EIR be prepared prior to any resolution of this matter. November 25, 1987: Public Works Department sends letter (Exhibit H) informing Caltrans of Planning Commission's November 4, 1987 action. In addition, City requests Caltrans' assistance in locating existing studies (October 14, 1987) relating to: a) Air quality b) Possible objectionable odors c) Possible increase in noise levels d) Generation of additional vehicular movement e) Effects on existing parking or demand for new parking f) Alterations to present circulation patterns g) Possible increased traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians h) Impacts to road maintenance and other public facilities i) Police department impacts j) Environmental impacts These concerns were not addressed in Caltrans' October 14th, 1987 correspondence. December 1, 1987: Caltrans responds (Exhibit I) to staff's request by providing the 1986 Economic Impact Study. Caltrans did not provide any data addressing concerns a -j above. December 17, 1987: Public Works Department again asks (Exhibit J) Caltrans for information regarding concerns a -j above. 3 January 7, 1988: Representatives from the Public Works and Planning Department met with representatives from Caltrans to discuss the project. Caltrans indicated they will provide the requested information concerning items a -j above. February 1, 1988: Public Works staff telephones Caltrans regarding status of supplying information. March 17, 1988: Public Works Department again asks Caltrans (Exhibit K) for information regarding concerns a -j. April 12, 1988: Caltrans provides (Exhibit L) the following information to staff: 1. Environmental Fact Sheet 2. P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes along PCH In summary, this information indicated the following: A. The accident rate of the total 753 accidents recorded for a 4 -year, 11 -month period on PCH through Hermosa Beach is approximately 27% greater than the average for Los Angeles, Ventura and Orange Counties. B. The total southbound accidents recorded for the vening peak period exceed the total northbound accidents recorded for the morning peak period by 42.9%. C. The "congestion -related" (rear -end or side -swipe type) southbound accidents recorded for the evening peak period exceed the congestion -related northbound accidents recorded for the morning peak period by 103.2%. It is Caltrans' opinion that the proposed measure is justified both on the basis of public safety and public convenience. They urge prompt action by the City "to expedite the flow of traffic through Hermosa Beach, to improve safety on the streets and highways in Hermosa Beach and to limit further potential tort liability to both the City of Hermosa Beach and Caltrans." Between April and June 1988 staff evaluates all information supplied to date. May 24, 1988: Planning Commission recommends (Exhibit M) that City Council consider the (west -side PCH parking removal) issue separately from the Circulation Element, including its own Environmental Impact Report. City Council accepts and files Planning Commission's recommendation. June 21, 1988: Planning Commission discussed (Exhibit N) parking removal and will recommend to City Council that staff continue to pursue obtaining information from Caltrans - using whatever method necessary to obtain the information for preparation of a focused EIR. 4 4. The Circulation Element The Planning Department says that a general study of PCH is included as part of the Circulation Element (being prepared by DKS Consultants). However, the removal of parking is not a specific task with the scope of work. The Circulation Element will review economic and general impacts on PCH. It will not "focus" on the specific impacts identified in the environmental assessment. This will cost additional money. Included in their original contract cost, DKS has collected the following general PCH information in preparation of the Circulation Element: a) b) - Traffic Counts - Parking Survey Data - Turning Movement Counts at Intersections - 1987 Caltrans 24-hour Machine Counts - Estimated Through Trips 5. Available Alternatives and Costs Include as part of Circulation Element. To combine the specific concerns identified in the environmental assessment with the Circulation Element is beyond DKS' scope of work. It could cost up to $5,000 to include the "focused" concerns within the Circulation Element. Consider separately from Circulation Element. If directed to proceed with a focused EIR, separate from the Circulation Element, there could be the following potential cost impact: 1. Noticing for Public Hearing(s) 2. Estimated Fee for Focused Traffic Study EIR 3. Cost to Implement Project (to be borne by Caltrans) $ 300 $10,000 to $15,000 $ 2,000 Total Estimated Costs: $12,300 to $17,300 Time to complete: 4 to 8 weeks from Notice to Proceed. 6. Fiscal Impact On July 28, 1987 City Council approved a contract with DKS Consultants for the provision of a Circulation Element up -date in an amount not to exceed $70,000. 5 Additional appropriation required: $5,000. Funding source: State Gas Tax Fund Balance. 7. Summary One year has elapsed and we have not received all the information necessary for a focused EIR. Additional work is still needed. Caltrans will not pay for any additional studies. Council should be prepared to spend additional monies to implement this project. 8. Recommendation Based on cost it is recommended that DKS perform the additional work. Alternatives: Other alternatives available to City Council and considered by staff: 1. Determine that the information provided by Caltrans is sufficient. 2. Prepare the focused EIR in house. 3. Continue to pursue obtaining information from Caltrans. Respectfu3.1-y submitted, Deborah M. Murphy Assistant Engineer Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Concur: Ant ony Antic Director of • blic Works Concur: Micha-1 chubach Director of Planning cc: Viki Copeland, Finance Administrator DMM/umv . -_ • James P. Lough Attorney at Law June 20, 1988 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 30 North Raymond Avenue Suite 708 Pasadena. Calif. 91103-3930 MEMORANDUM REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney RE: Ballot Measure Confirming Business License Tax Increases Since August 31, 1985 Telephone (818) 792-4728 (818) 792-4776 Recommended Action: To approve the wording of the attached ordinance for placement on the November, 1988 ballot. Background: In November, 1986, the citizens of the State of California approved Proposition 62 which set up a new method for approving all taxes imposed by general law municipal govern- ments. The recent adoptions of the general and special utility user taxes were done pursuant to this proposition. One of the most significant provisions of this proposition was the requirement that general law cities have the people ratify all taxes imposed after August 31, 1985. What is meant by this requirement is currently undergoing several challenges in the courts. For those taxes not confirmed by the voters, cities must stop imposing them by November 15, 1988. The term "imposition" probably refers to the initial establishment of a tax. However, if the term includes all tax increases, those taxes increased since August 31, 1985 would be repealed, or reduced to their original rate, if not approved by the voters. Analysis,: The attached ordinance contains three business license ordinances, a transient occupancy tax increase, and a park and recreation facilities tax increase. All of these taxes were increased since August 31, 198t. In order to make sure that these taxes will continue, voters must approve their readop- tion by a majority vote. The ordinance also contains a provi- sion which allows the City Council to change the rate of the taxes imposed by three (3) affirmative votes. This provision would allow the City Council to make adjustments in business license taxes without a vote of the people. This option is being recommended since most of the business license taxes or 26/SR0628A -1- REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney RE: Ballot Measure Confirming Business License Tax Increases Since August 31, 1985 categories do not generate enough funds to make future increases justify the cost of an entire ballot measure. JPL/gp NOTED: Respectfull b.mitte KEVIN B. NORTHCRAFT, City Manager City Manager's Comment: It seems appropriate to provide for adjustments in rates to maintain constant value, despite changes in the cost of living. However, Section 4 of the ordi- nance may be so broad as to be cause for cbncern by voters. As an alternative, the Council may wish to consider a cost of living escalator provision for rates that do not otherwise adjust for inflation. 26/SR0628A -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING AND AMENDING CHAPTERS 17 (LICENSES AND PERMITS) AND 30 (TAXATION) CONCERNING BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES, TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAXES AND PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES TAXES. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance Numbers 85-819, 86-842 and 86-857 are hereby readopted and confirmed. Said ordinances establish busi- ness license fees for those businesses which do business within the boundaries of the City of Hermosa Beach. Said taxes shall continue to be imposed and collected in the same manner as set forth in the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Section 2. Ordinance Number 86-826, increasing the Tran- sient Occupancy Tax from six (6%) percent to eight (8%) percent, is hereby readopted and confirmed. Said tax shall be collected in the same manner as established under the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Section 3. Ordinance Number 86-849, increasing the Park and Recreation Facilities Tax from five hundred ($500.00) dollars to thirty-five hundred ($3,500.00) dollars for each new residential dwelling unit, is hereby readopted and confirmed. Said tax shall be collected in the same manner as established under the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Section 4. The City Council, by three (3) affirmative votes, is empowered to adjust the rate from time to time of all 26/ORD22 -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 27 28 business license taxes established under Chapter 17 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, the Transient Occupancy Tax and the Park and Recreation Facilities Tax, as the City Council finds in the exercise of reasonable discretion and fiscal pru- dence is required to provide funds for the financial obligations of the City of Hermosa Beach. Section 5. This ordinance shall be effective upon approval by the electorate in the manner provided by law. Section 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF 1988. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS T ORM: [::' Y ATTORNE 6/ORD2 2 -2- PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA June 7, 1988 City Council Meeting June 14, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council yACAICIES_.BQARQS AND.COMMISSIQNS ILANNING. COMMISSIQN RECOMMENDATION 1) Request by Councilmember Sheldon for reconsideration of interviewing prospective Planning Commissioners. 2) Appointment of 2 Commissioners for terms ending June 30, 1992. QACKGROUND Commissioners Gerald Compton and Tony DeBellis are both eligible for reappointment. A copy of their absence record is attached. We still have five applications of file. Additional advertising was done, but no further applications were received. The applicants are: Rhett D. Beavers, 606 Hollowell Avenue Rick Colman, 502 Longfellow John R. Edwards, 501-33 Herondo Street Christine M. Ketz, 335 -31st Street Howard M. Simon, 2436 Palm Drive Concur: KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE, C e , CityClerk EVIN B. NIRTH City Manager a PLANNING COMMISSION Absence Record / 9'g DATE NAME REASON /1,V 8 0?In 3/1 /fl k/3 f i s/3/0 S// 3/48' JJ Pe4.n.CQ 3 c 94 5;1a4- 7-07 �.e.4eLt G41.atAt Cue/K; GQ. A • IS49 ek4; kw PLANNING COMMISSION Absence Record 94` DATE NAME REASON az-J3/f"7 417/i-7 ?AMS ./0/go/r7 -737 .i2e4<.2t�v p24.42zit 151X.,)4411,1 64.413.1,"..L424 /.47644.4 Ak11, 11 It C C.4-4M.e 41.4% AGLAIA...6) PROOF OF PUBLICATION This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Los Angeles, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above -entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printe Proof of Publication of Beach Peoo1e's Easy Read, a newspaper of general circulation, p and published in the City of County of Los Angeles, and newspaper has been adjudged a news of general circulation by the Superior of the County of Los Angeles, S California, under the date of....9/21 Case Number .....sw. 22940 ........<..; that the of which the annexed is a printed cop in type not smaller than nonpareil) been published in each regular and issue of said newspaper and not In any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit: 5/5 weekly Hermosa Beach NNING COM ISBION V'AOANCtE `f WO TERMS END1 G.JUWE 30, 1&9 unci l of the City of Her mesa Beach is on the ;fie a,8 ih l NNIN 5/19 all in the year 19..88.. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Hermosa Beach California, hts...��.....day of.kY.... 19... 1t Signature Free cables of this blank form may be secured from: CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU, INC. Legal Advertising Clearing House P.O. Box 31 Los Angeles, CA 90053 Telephone 625-2541 Please request GENERAL Proof of Publication when ordering this form. Motion Rosenberger, second Mayor Simpson. AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - None Further Action: To direct the City Attorney to prepare a ballot proposition for an initiative measure. The measure would seek electorate approval or disapproval for either sale of, or land trade of, the Biltmore site (subject to Government Code and to include an M.A.I. appraisal). The sale or land trade would be solely for the purpose of acquisition of the abandoned railroad right-of-way for parkland and open space uses. (Sale at highest value after appraisal.) Motion Creighton, second Mayor Simpson AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - None Further Action: To direct the City Attorney to prepare a ballot measure that retains the Biltmore Site for use as a park, any change from park use to be made only with a vote of the people. Motion Sheldon, second Williams AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - Rosenberger Final Action: To authorize Councilmember Rosenberger to write a proposed measure within 48 hours that would al- low sale of the Biltmore site while preserving the com- mercial area and zoning for tax benefits. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - None (e) Report re. ATSF right-of-way. City Attorney Lough advised that the Environmental Im- pact Report will be brought back to Council at the meet- ing of February 23, 1988. 9• OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Discussion requested by Councilmember Williams re. requiring interviews for prospective Planning Commissioners. Proposed Action: To establish a City Council policy to interview prospective Planning Commissioners. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton AYES - Rosenberger, Williams NOES - Creighton, Sheldon, Mayor Simpson Motion fails. 7 Minutes 2-9-88 April 6, 1988 City Council Meeting April 12, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council PLANNING COMMISSION EXPIRATION OF TERMS Recommendation City Council to make a policy determination regarding the necessity for actively soliciting applications for the two Planning Commission terms expiring June 30, 1988. Such solicitation could be done by newspaper advertising, or Council could determine that the applications on file were sufficient and the posting of a notice of expiration of terms would suffice. Background On June 30, 1988, the terms for Planning Commissioners Gerald Compton and Tony DeBellis will expire, however, both Commissioners are eligible for reappointment. At the present time, we have five applications on file. The following applicants have been contacted and have indicated their interest in serving on the Planning Commission: Rhett D. Beavers, 606 Hollowell Avenue Rick Colman, 502 Longfellow John R. Edwards, 501-33 Herondo Street Christine M. Ketz, 335 - 31st Street Howard M. Simon, 2436 Palm Drive The Commission appointments will be scheduled for June 14, 1988 and at that time you will be given all completed applications. If Council wishes the City Clerk's office to advertise for additional applicants, this should be done by May 26, 1988 at the latest. Concur: EVI B. NORTHFT, City Manager Y(OCPWeGoti&le.ald&AAJ KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk 11d THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL COMMISSION NAME OF COMMISSION Planning Commission Name: Rhett D. Beavers Address: 606 Hollowell Ave. Hermosa Bch, CA 90254 Home Phone: 318-7176 Occupation or Profession: Sr. Community Planner/Landscape Architect Name of Employer: P & D Technologies (formerly PRC Engineering) Address of Employer:972 Town & Country. Orange Business Phone: 714-835-4447 BIOGRAPHICAL Marital Status: Married Spouse's Name: Brenda Reiswerg Children: none (Names and Ages) Date of Birth: 3/11/50 Place of Birth: New Iberia, Louisiana EDUCATION Elementary School: College (s): Univ. of Texas, Austin High School: Texas A & M Degrees and Titles: B.B.A. Finance, University of Texas, Austin.(1972) M.L.A. Landscape Architecture, Texas A & M (1979) (Include names of schools and dates, if applicable) Local References: (Optional) Professional: Warren Roche, AIA, Newport Beach, CA Other: Community Participation and Service: Cultural Arts Council of Houston. Architecture Grants Panel, 1981-1986 Activities and Hobbies: Reading, Architecture, Walking, Gardening -2 - Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? Community participation is is a duty and a privilege which I find both professionally and personally rewarding_ What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission Member' Please see reverse side of this page. What are your present civil, fraternal or professional memberships and obligations? American Society of Landscape Architects. California Council of Landscape Architects. Society of Commercial Archeology. Do you have any concurrent obligations and responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interests? If so, what are they? No. Please give a resume of your education, employment, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission member. Please see attached professional resume. How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? Six months Comments: Signed• Date: November 17. 1987 Received: SCHOOLS Texas A&M University University of Texas CITIZENSHIP U.S.A. PROFESSIONAL. RECORD RHETT D. BEAVERS EDUCATION ATTENDANCE 1979 1972 PERSONAL DATA LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY English PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS Registered Landscape Architect - Texas (0810) New Community Planning Site Planning Finance and Accounting SPECIALIZATION EXPERIENCE RECORD DEGREE CONFERRED M.L.A. - Landscape Architecture B.B.A. - Finance DATE OF BIRTH 3/11/50 Urban Design Landscape Architecture PRC ENGINEERING 1985 - Present Senior Planner/Project Director Orange, California Currently a senior planner and project director responsible for various aspects of projects including urban design, site planning, site analysis and documentation, mass grading, and new community design and planning. Responsible for the new community element of the State of Oklahoma proposal for the Super Conducting Super Collider project of the Department of Energy. The effort involved establishing the criteria, the elements and the form for a new community of 20,000 persons. Deputy Project Manager for Banning -Lewis Ranch, a 20,000 acre new town located east of Colorado Springs, Colorado. The planning effort includes information gathering; site and regional analysis; transportation and infrastructure strategies and design; fiscal and environmental impact studies; land use and master planning; and site planning. In addition, PRC Engineering, as lead consultant, oversees a Rhett D. Beavers (Continued) 2 number of sub -consultants on this project. Other representative experience includes: The Isles of Nassau Bay - Site design and lot layout for a 76 acre high end waterfront housing development near Galveston, Texas. Abu Dhabi Naval Base - Housing layout and master planning for a proposed naval base for The United Arab Emirates. Lakeside - Lot layout and site design for a 162 acre mid to high end housing development in Houston, Texas. The Parkway - Office cluster site planning, urban design, and food court design for various parcels in a 563 acre high end mixed use development in Houston, Texas. THE WOODLANDS CORPORATION 1981 - 1985 Staff Planner/Landscape Architect The Woodlands, Texas Staff Planner/Landscape Architect for The Woodlands, a 25,000 acre new town located 35 miles north of Houston, Texas. This is the only federally - funded new town to be an independent success. Design responsibilities include the master planning of The Metro Center, the 5,000 acre business complex in The Woodlands site planning for commercial/industrial prospects; master planning mixed use developments; neighborhood design and lot layouts; and master landscape planning. Involvement in other Woodlands Corporation projects include master planning and site planning for the Esplanade, a 188 acre mixed use development near Houston Intercontinental Airport. Master planning of Lake Catamount, a 3,200+ acre summer and winter resort adjacent to Steamboat Springs, Colorado. Landscape Architecture including master landscape planning, signage design and entry treatment for a number of Galveston, Texas, beach/bay front second home communities. EDEA 1980 - 1981 Planner/Landscape Architect Ft. Lauderdale, Florida/Houston, Texas Design responsibilities include land planning and lot layout on a 45 hectare mixed use parcel in Mexico City, Mexico; master planning portions of the Fountain Hills development outside of Phoenix, Arizona; and numerous landscape and urban design projects in Florida, Louisiana, and Texas. AFFILIATIONS American Society of Landscape Architects (M) California Council of Landscape Architects Society for Cultural Archaeology Rhett D. Beavers 606 Hollowell Avenue Hermosa Beach, California 90254 213/318-7176 November 18, 1987 Good Day: Please find enclosed my application for appointment to the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission. Though I am a relatively new resident of Hermosa Beach, my interest in serving on the Planning Commission is strong as is my professional experience in the area of community planning and landscape architecture. Should you have any questions regarding my application or if you need further information, please do not hesitate to call me. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to the opportunity to work with the Planning Commission. Sincerely, Rhett Beavers THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH N r Z AV/ APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPA NAME OF COMMISSION PLANNING Name: Rick Colman Address: 502 Longfellow • Occupation or Profession: Architect Name of Employer: self-employed Home Phone: 379-7167 office Address of Employcr: 39 Fourteenth St. H.B. Burliness Phone: 318-8847 BIOGRAPHICAL Marital Status: married Children: Nicole (11). Jessica (7), Daniel '(1) Spouse's Name: El i ssa (Names and Ages) Date of Birth: 6/7/49 EDUCATION Elementary School: (Michigan) High School: (Michigan) Degrees and Titles: Place of Birth: Detroit MI College .(s):Universitv.of Michigan U.C.L.A. U of M: B.A. (American Culture); U.C.L.A.:4aster Architecture (Include names of schools and dates, if applicabl Local References: (Optional) Professional: Other: (see attached) Community Participation and Service: none to date Activities and Hobbies: bicycl1ng,hiking, photography -2 - Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? (please see attached Personal Statement) What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission Memt To be well-informed on all agenda items, and given the interests of all parties in- volved, to render opinions consistent with the long-range good of the community What are your present civil, fraternal or professional memberships and obligations? American Institute of Architects Do you have any concurrent obligations and responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interests? If so, what are they? None Please give a resume of your education, employment, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission member. (please see attached Personal Statement) How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? 4 years Comments: Date: ''/14 /S1 Received: RICK COLMAN: Personal Statement Upon graduating from UCLA's School of Architecture and Urban Planning in 1976, I began working for Mr. Peter Choate, who is surely one of the most talented residential architects in the country. I ended up staying on for ten years, the last seven of which I spent as a partner in the firm. Our firm's work was featured several times in prestigious publications such as Architectural Digest, Town and Country, and House and Garden. For ten critical years of my training, I was steeped in architecture of the absolute highest caliber. Early in 1986 I went out on my own and established an office in Hermosa Beach, where I've lived since 1983. My office is located at 39 Fourteenth Street (adjacent to the Biltmore site!). My professional specialty is residential architecture, and I'm particularly proud of my two local projects which are now nearing completion: 41 19th Street, Hermosa Beach, and 1604 Ocean Ave., Manhattan Beach. I feel that these two quite different pieces of architecture accurately reflect my high aesthetic standards. My professional training and my natural disposition has inclined me over the years to issues of the environment. I see the position on the Planning Commission as an opportunity to take such concerns one step further. This will undoubtedly sound cliched, but: I see the position as an opportunity to make a positive contribution to this community which I love. Hermosa is truly unique and special and I will forever be an advocate of it remaining so. It will remain so, I feel, not by denying or discouraging development, but by guiding and encouraging appropriate development. And I emphatically believe that the same project can both beautifully serve the public interest and turn a handsome profit for a developer. If the above sounds overly idealistic, I look forward to the opportunity of having my idealism tempered by the harsh realities of the real world. I have in the past had quite widespread exposure to Planning Commissions, Architectural Review Boards, and Homeowner's Associations in various communities, but have never sat "on the other side of the table". However, I feel that I have a pretty good insight into what makes for a successful group, and I feel strongly that I can contribute significantly to the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission. Rick Colman September 14, 1987 PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL REFERENCES Mr. Al Albergate Public Information officer for City of Los Angeles District Attorney (213) 974-3528 Gary Davis, Principal Davis-Fejes Design Structural Engineers (213) 474-0575 Mr. Raymond Hansen, Principal Raymond Hansen Associates, ASLA Registered Lanscape Architect, California & Massachusetts Member of City of Santa Monica Architectural Review Board (213) 450-8898 Mr. Peter Choate, Principal Choate Associates Architects (213) 477-1547 Mr. Richard Blumenberg, Architect Pacific Palisades Civic League (213) 208-0478 1'Hi. l:1 "1 1 Ut HLH11 u A 131ACH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL COMMISSION NAME OF COMMISSION Pt 41V w ISN" Name: ‘70;‘,4-4) / f C4IALEDS' CA( pey:xY Address: 60/-3 3 flEeawvo S hb"-moy¢ Home Phone: 3AY 1I -O Occupation or Profession: JVf,atgle•rT J lG;% e5C, Name of Employer: a S. /4- I'S 4ce S/-cEOlVir 4911 ,6vvico,vme,,Alt f/•efivwAi SD/D6v Address of Employer: ri' 30j 71g 9eoo' Burliness Phone: 6 S/3-o7.� BIOGRAPHICAL Marital Status: A6a Spouse's Name: lyes Children: ,04w,v,4 ) (Names and Ages) Date of Birth: 1' %-`%S- Place of Birth: L tSAa4-, �� 7 EDUCATION Elementary School: Ritterlc�& C College (s): u?.g 644426.1v-0.0-1.773 High School:044n verJes I43. (,[ Sc Cyra.2 ) - /)6 Degrees and Tit les : M4 7 f ( el ''''4"11'144471-4-1 if'e✓i -t(SC - (Include names of scho is a dates, if applicable Local References: (Optional) F73a_ Professional: 14(06 . N.. AAOYLo .' ()3-o 9 33 Other: Community Participation and Service: 4etea.el�SPC�. AQrr 4 J Activities and Hobbies: Boop- f % Z c tL.) Gt ,gyp -2 - Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? To Lip s - `i'ulr t de,,, op "AI.* Cowl rh.K M z 1 �� IN w i'K, pr' `6'" ver t-ol f,` /. What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission Membe To reviiw CIO or , fb.r.u(./e43 ,4yyp AD'eJs 4 e).4.41 U kly What are your present civil, fraternal or professional memberships and obligations? Ivl� Do you have any concurrent obligations and responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interests? If so, what are they? No Please give a resume of your education, employment, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission member. aockorr ice, Zoo 1 a > Mks+t s i) EVViYON Mme,( Sir,1 EMM -017w t+t roe \Aar -fes• 3rs "d" 1it. M. Also/s Ca . °1' a1 toil% Ar Fame 4.4- . ,DVV7 ivI " 4forka M 40414542,k of/rots A C0 e M+.. • How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? 5.4ICe kiA,rc. A i T$ 7 Comments: Jv.../ * Q e �j '{' Td w M e_ 3A/ J4a#4 r '* sr osit a A �ow, 4-7)&14. , Signed:52„4 IC. Date : /I troy p' % Received: THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL COMMISSION NAME OF COMMISSION Planning Commission Name:Christine M. Ketz Address: 335 31st St. Hermosa Beach Occupation or Profession: Planning Home Phone: 318-3508 Name of Employer: Chris Ketz and Associates Address of Employer:1142 Manhattan Ave Ste CP Marital Status: Children: Manhattan Beach BIOGRAPHICAL Married Erika -- 3 yrs old (Names and Ages) 6 iudiness Phone: 318-9458 Spouse's Name: Gerald Date of Birth: i -10-4R Place of Birth:Scranton, Pennsylvania EDUCATION Elementary School: Bancroft E. S. High School: Central H. 5. Degrees and Titles: Local References: College .(s)•Bloomsbur3 State Univer. U. of Louisville Tenn. State Unversity n_s 'Ago M_S_ Community Development '73 MBA'81 (Include names of schools and dates, if applicable; (Optional) Sue Haller Armstrong 372-1171 Professional: George Pia 623-5536; Charles Schempeler 619-0939 Other: Community Participation and Service: I have not provided enough community service but I am very interested in participating. Activities and Hobbies: bike riding. beach walking, tennis, skiing ,ef) afCEIVEbS NOV 1 91987► Clty Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 9 -2 - Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? I feel that I could contribute my experience and knowledge to the city where I live. I really care about Hermosa Beach and its quality of life. What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission Membe To provide guidelines for development and to carefully review the Community Plan, its policies and any zoning chang requests for their impact on the community. What are your present civil, fraternal or professional memberships and obligations? member --American Planning Association member --Association of Environmental Planners Do you have any concurrent obligations and responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interests? If so, what are they? no Please give a resume of your education, employment, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission member. I have worked in the Planning profession for over 15 years, eight of which I was the Director of Current Planning for the Louisville and Jefferson County Planning Commission. See attached resume for details. How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? 1 1/2 years now and 1 yr in 1981 Comments: see attached Signed: Pte, Date: November 17. 1987 Received: CHRISTINE KETZ PRINCIPAL CHRIS KETZ AND ASSOCIATES Ms. Ketz is an urban and economic planner with 18 years experience in land use planning, preparing community plans, environmental impact assessments and economic and market analyses. Her experience encompasses eight years with city - county Planning Commission including a position as Director of Current Planning, and positions conducting economic and market research. Her experience with all aspects of urban planning provides Ms. Ketz with the ability to identify critical planning and economic issues, evaluate land development proposals and make knowledgable decisions on future growth. EDUCATION MBA Tennessee State University --1981 MS Community Development --University of Louisville --1973 BS Bloomsburg University --1969 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Ms. Ketz has served as the Project Manager for numerous projects including the Eastside Enterprise Zone Application, the site, market and financial analysis phases of the joint development project for the Los Angeles -Long Beach Light Rail project, the Community Plan Update for East Los Angeles, and the Pershing Square Environmental Impact Report. Project experience includes: 1) Economic Analysis for Benefit Assessment Districts for the Southern California Rapid Transit District Metro Rail System. Ms. Ketz participated in the initial analysis and development of benefit assessment districts including involvement with a Task Force, and the writing of the documentation report. 2) Land Use Technical Document for the Environmental Impact Report for the Metro Rail Project for SCRTD. This report documents the economic and land use impacts of station related growth induced by Metro Rail. 3) Environmental Impact Analysis for the Zoning Consistency Project for the City of Los Angeles. Ms. Ketz analyzed and developed the public facilities, population and housing elements of Environmental Impact Reports for several areas of the City. 4) Feasibility Analysis for Joint Development at Light Rail Station Sites. Ms. Ketz conducted an analysis which included site constraints, market viability and financial feasibility of various development scenarios for individual station sites. 5) Current Planning Projects. Ms. Ketz has analyzed site development proposals, conducted commercial needs assessments, market analyses and environmental analyses. Ms. Ketz has also analyzed and written area land use studies and conducted major studies such as a large industrial park located along a riverfront. 6) Housing Inventory Analysis for the Community Redevelopment Agency. Ms. Ketz supervised the inventory of financial techniques used in housing projects funded by CRA and the inventory of housing projects in Los Angeles. 7) Redevelopment Area Plans for Santa Ana. Redevelopment Plans for three areas were reviewed and revised. Ms. Ketz's involvement included financial techniques available to developers. 8) Financial Analysis and Market Analysis. Ms. Ketz developed a pricing strategy for computer processed accounting product. Project included the financial analysis of the division, analysis of the present product base and price structure, and competitive analysis. 9) Market Research and Forecasting. Projects included the analysis of prospective customers in order to forecast sales and to determine target markets, forecasting customer growth using regression analysis, competitive rate and market share studies and surveys. 10) Design of a System for Appealing Benefit Assessments. Ms. Ketz developed the system by which appeals of benefit assessments are processed. The system included the procedures, internal administration, staffing and budget. PROFESSIONAL HISTORY Chris Ketz and Associates --Principal Cordoba Corporation --Senior Analyst Kaiser Permanente --Market Research Analyst U.S. Census Bureau --Office Operations Manager Louisville and Jefferson County Planning Commission --Director of Current Planning PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Planning Association Who's Who in American Women November 17, 1987 Ms. Etta Simpson Mayor Hermosa Beach City Hall 1215 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Mayor Simpson: I am a Hermosa Beach resident and planner by profession, and would very much like to volunteer by time and services to the community as a member of the Planning Commission. Hermosa Beach is at a critical time in its development. As land prices rise, there is a pressure to develop or redevelop at greater intensities but the direction and amount of growth must be planned and not merely left to the forces of economics. The character and charm of Hermosa is one of a "relaxed beach city." Many economic levels and age groups reside here which make the city the great place that it is. Residents are becoming actively concerned about the future of the city as witnessed by the success of the Open Space initiatives. Hermosa Beach will grow as all cities must. However, the decision of how growth is controlled must be made with many factors in mind --the residents, the environmental effects i.e. traffic and parking and the economic return to the city. I have a masters degree in Community Development and a MBA. I would be very interested in the appointment to the Planning Commission. I am enclosing a copy of my resume and a completed application. I look forward to working with you and the City Council. Very truly yours, Chris Ketz enclosure cc: Jim Rosenberger June Williams Roger Creighton Chuck Sheldon THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL COMMISSION NAME OF COMMISSION PLANNING Mune: Howard M. Simon Address: 2436 Palm Drive, H.B. CA 90254 Home Phone : (213) 372-5218 Occupation or Profession: Planning Consultant Name of Employer: Xerox Corporation Address of Employer: 101 Continental Blvd., Suite 431 El Seaundo. CA 90245 Budiness Phone: (213) 333-2187 BIOGRAPHICAL Marital Status: Single Children: None Spouse's Name: (Names and Ages) Date of Birth: 11/17/56 Place of Birth: Los Angeles, CA EDUCATION Elementary School: High School: Beverly Degrees and Titles Local References: Rosewood Ave. - W. Hollywoddol lege .(s) : UCLA, CSUN, USC Hills High Master of Business Administration, USC, December, 1982 . Bachelor of Science, Business Administration, CSUN, June, 1981 (Include names of schools and dates, if applicable) Jeanette Carr Roy Judd Al Gradowski (Optional) 2432 Palm Dr. 2416 Hermosa 107 - 24th Dan Cota Susan Rubin Professional: 1630 Monterey 225 - 27th Other: Dave Mundhenke 1630 Monterey Xerox managers & neighbors Community Participation and Service: Hermosa Beach Historical Society Charter Member - MOCA Sierra Club Member Assistant Scoutmaster - Troop 64 Activities and Hobbies: Restoring my house, beach volleyball, bicycling, jogging bgEntb NOV 1 91987• m cts* City of Hermosa Bead -2- Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? To use my financial, analytic, negotiation skills and creativity to preserve the railroad right-of-way open space, and to peeserve the neighborly, small-town atmosphere by limiting residential density, increasing off-street parking, and attracting quality businesses. What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission Membe To support the desires of the community in interpreting and ruling on issues which come before the commission. To recommend actions which maintain or enhance the quality of life in Hermosa Beach. What are your present civil, fraternal or professional memberships and obligations? USC Commerce Associates Do you have any concurrent obligations and responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interests? If so, what are they? NO Please give a resume of your education, employment, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission member. See attached resume. Native of Los Angeles. How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? since September, 1986 Comments: Please feel free to call or visit. I would be happy to meet and discuss my qualifications, as you are already familiar with the other candidates. Hermosa Beach is a wonderful place to live and I would like to help maintain thaf mag- as `t a member of the Planning Commission. Signed: Date: November 18, 1987 Received: EXPERIENCE EDUCATION PUBLICATIONS OTHER INTERESTS HOWARD M. SIMON 2436 Palm Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (213) 372-5218 XEROX CORPORATION PLANNING CONSULTANT SR. PLANNING ANALYST PRICING ANALYST El Segundo, CA July, 1987 - present March, 1986 - June, 1987 February, 1985 - February, 1986 Developed product positioning and pricing strategies for Xerox desktop publishing systems, integrated office systems, and end of life strategies for Xerox personal computers. Prepared pricing proposals and assessed competitive relationships for senior corporate management presentations. Created and implemented tactical pricing actions to achieve current year targets in direct and retail channels. Created Xerox approach to software site licensing, which saves $5 million per year and increases customer satisfaction. Provided negotiated bid and government contract pricing support. Participated in six new product launch teams. FINANCIAL ANALYST August, 1983 - January, 1985 Controller for Systems Marketing Division headquarters annual budget of $49 million and 450 people after working in five other divisions due to reorganizations. Prepared strategic and operations plans, capital budgeting and reorganization plans. Member customer support artificial intelligence program team. Designed automated data feed used by 24 analysts saving 200 analyst hours per month. Rewrote financial section of sales training manual. Trained three new analysts. HERBERT LASKIN, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Los Angeles, CA ACCOUNTANT November, 1978 - August 1983 Consulting services for individuals, small businesses, and employee benefit plans. Performed financial and tax planning, cash flow and investment analysis, preparation and analysis of financial statements, research, and presentations to clients. Represented clients at IRS audits. Successful in business development. NATIONAL ACCOUNT SYSTEMS, INC. Los Angeles, CA LEGAL DEPARTMENT SUPERVISOR October, 1975 - August, 1978 Performed negotiations, departmental budgeting, client relations and evaluation of account activity. Increased monthly collections by 600 percent. Prepared Legal Department procedures guide and job descriptions for implementation in the San Francisco office. Supervised five people. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION December, 1982 Concentrations: Finance, Organizational Behavior Deans List Developed the `Synergism / Diversification Matrix' Strategic Planning Model CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE BACHELOR OF SCIENCE Major: Business Administration, Accounting Option Minor: Computer Science Small Business Institute -- Field Marketing Consultant "Competitive Pricing" introducing the Price Indifference Curve Model. Real estate restoration and preservation. Stock, commodity and money markets. Beach volleyball, tennis. cross-country skiing, travel, photography. June, 1981 Deans List June 22, 1988 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL OF JUNE 28, 1988 POLICE ACTIVITY REPORT FOR MAY 1988 The Fiesta -de la-Artes, during the Memorial Day weekend was celebrated without incident. The gusty winds caused some havoc and clean-up problems. The crowds were also smaller than usual. Detectives recovered $90,000 in reported stolen diamonds last month after a six month investigation. They served three search warrants with allied agencies and recovered a quantity of cocaine and narcotics. Investigators also identified the suspect in an armed robbery of a resident who lost a $39,000 car. A felony complaint has been filed. They also arrested the third (and last) suspect in the burglary of Vasek Polak porsche dealership. They had staked out a business after learning the suspect was back in the area. He had fled to northern California when he learned he was wanted, police said. CONSTRUCTION UPDATE The first month of construction has been completed on the first floor renovation of the Police Department. The project is moving in a timely manner. Some electrical disruptions and power surges occurred both to Police and Fire facilities. This caused some inconvenience and equipment damage. Our new UPS emergency electrical system also being installed this summer will eliminate their brownouts. We have received shipment on some of the computer equipment for our new dispatch center. The daily operation of the Records Bureau and Jail Facility is working as best as could be expected, under the circum- stances. A few citizens have gotten lost finding our temporary location. Other city department employees have been very helpful in assisting citizens and answering any questions about our hours of operation. City Council Meeting PAGE 2 CRIME PREVENTION The month of May was cause for celebration and sorrow. The D.A.R.E. classes at Our Lady of Guadalupe School were a rousing success and brought the students, teachers and parents closer together with the Police Department. Unfortunately, a more meaningful closeness was experienced through the untimely death of a student. A fourth grader, Victor Bornino, was on his way home from school when he darted into the street from between two parked cars and was struck by a vehicle. The accident occurred in Redondo Beach. Victor was rushed to the trauma unit at Harbor General Hospital but, died the next day. There was a funeral mass for him attended by his students, teachers, friends and family. Officer Thompson respectfully represented the City and Police Department and expressed our sorrow. Three new Neighborhood Watch Programs have started in different areas of the city. It is gratifying to see increased citizen participation in our Crime Prevention Programs. We are committed to maintaining high visibility for these programs. Noted: Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety /Kevin Northcraft City Manager Respectfully submitted, Val Straser, Captain Administrative Services HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT May 1988 OFFENSES REPORTED PERSONS ARRESTED THIS MONTH THIS MONTH ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Murder 0 0 2 0 2. Rape 0 1 1 3 3. Robbery 0 5 9 12 4. Assault 6 74 31 34 5. Burglary 23 23 116 111 6. Larceny 30 40 166 200 7. Motor Vehicle Theft 4 13 61 59 8. DUI 12 37 140 264 9. All Other Offenses 245 336 1330 1784 PERSONS ARRESTED TRAFFIC REPORT THIS MONTH THIS MONTH ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Adults 47 105 464 598 2. Juveniles 2 1 3 3 3. Criminal Citations 69 21 313 92 TRAFFIC REPORT THIS MONTH THIS MONTH 1HIS MONTH ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE ACCIDENTS 0 0 0 0 1. Fatal 2. Injury 13 17 54 55 3. Property damage only 13 25 93 180 CITATIONS 148 290 1089 1674 1. Traffic Citations 2. Parking Citations 16 18 72 271 ALLS FOR SERVICE THIS MONTH THIS MONTH ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Total Calls 1606 1902 8716 9433 June 20, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 28, 1988 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, MAY 1988 - Final revisions to the 88-89 budget are being made so that it can be reprinted. - As part of the audit for 1987-88, the auditors are working with Swope Valuation on testing of the appraisal methods used for fixed assets. STATISTICAL SECTION MAY 1988 MAY 1987 YEAR TO YEAR TO DATE 88 DATE 87 CITATION PAYMENTS 3,515 4,879 53,314 58,746 INVOICES 15 18 106 132 CASH RECEIPTS 1,373 1,411 14,546 17,141 WARRANTS 296 236 2,984 2,763 PURCHASE ORDERS 287 258 3,097 2,810 UUT EXEMPTIONS 577 553 FILED TO DATE PAYROLL FULL TIME 148 140 PART TIME 46 41 Noted: evin B. Nort a t Viki Co'e and City Manager Finance Administrator June 23, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 28, 1988 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT MAY ACTIVITY REPORT Labor Relations: * Concluded negotiations with the Police Officers' Officers' and Sergeants' Bargaining Unit. * Continued negotiations with the Police Officers' Captains' and Lieutenants' Bargaining Unit. Risk Management: * Conducted renewal negotiations for the City's Excess Workers' Compensation insurance. * Processed renewal information for the City's Liability insurance. Training: * Coordinated attendance at the training consortium seminar for the City managers/supervisors. This seminar was on the issue of Effectively Administering the Evaluation Process and Disciplinary Actions. Reppectfully submitted, Association, Association, Noted: dOr Robert A. Blackwood, Director Kevin B. North raft City Manager Personnel & Risk Management HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT May 1988 FIRE STATISTICS PARAMEDIC STATISTICS THIS MONTH THIS MONTH ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Total Calls 70 38 347 305 (TYPE) a. False Alarm 3 8 25 36 b. Mutual Aid 2 2 7 5 c. Paramedic Assists 35 33 190 160 d. Residence Fire 2 4 16 10 e. Commercial Fire 2 6 6 13 f. Other 26 18 103 114 PARAMEDIC STATISTICS INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION THIS MONTH THIS MONTH ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Total Responses 88 97 437 430 (TYPE) a. No Patient/Aid 10 10 58 45 b. Mutual Aid 0 0 1 0 c. Auto Accident 9 15 72 72 d. Strand Accident 9 5 39 12 e. Medical 36 32 171 139 f. Trauma 41 24 199 97 g. Assault 8 8 38 29 h. Jail 0 * 27 * i. Transports 42 52 179 217 j. Base Hosp.Con. 22 18 103 82 k. Trauma Center 2 0 4 8 INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION THIS MONTH THIS MON1H ONE YEAR AGO YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE 1. Commercial 103 43 463 259 2. Assembly 0 5 1 9 3. Apartments 18 16 91 122 4. Fumigations 8 7 50 63 5. Institutions 1 0 3 14 6. Industrial 0 0 10 5 * figures not available evin B.`fNorthcra�t, City Manager RQgctful ly/suami tted, v ki Director of Public Safety June 20, 1988 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL June 28, 1988 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT MAY. 1988 Staff reports were prepared for the following: 1. 1 text amendment. 2. 2 lot merger appeals. 3. 1 Final Map. 4. 1 C.U.P. revocation. 5. 1 variance. 6. 3 zone changes. 7. 5 C.U.P:'s for condominiums 8. 2 lot line adjustments. 9. 2 C.U.P.'s for commercial uses. 10. Second quarter General Plan Amendments. The following activities were undertaken for transit projects: 1. 1 transit report. 2. Routine tasks. Meetings and seminars attended by the Planning Department Staff 1. 22 meetings 2. 1 workshop seminar Budget Update Ending 4/30/88, expenditures were 13% below budget for 83% of the year. Ending 4/30/88, revenues were 31% above budget for 837 of the year. E -n -i -ng 5/31/88, expen ituri es were 13% beTow budget for 917 of the year. Ending 5/31/88, revenues were 35% above budget for 91% of the year. Transit Update "WAVE" Dial -a -Ride Ridership May, 1988 - 5,340 passengers April, 1988 - 5,107 passengers HERMOSA COMMUTER BUS Ridership (Discontinuance of this program effective May 27, 1988) May, 1988 - 242 passengers April, 198.8 - 275 passengers 1 Lot Merger Update Certified letters were sent to 18 property owners notifying owners of "intent to merge lots". "Notice of Intent to Merge Lots" were also recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorder's Office. Planning Commission heard 7 appeals. Upcoming agenda items 1. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application recommendation. 2. Special Study regarding measure of height, roof structures. 3. Text amendment to add a new R -1A Zone. CONCUR: Michel` Scfiubac Planning Director NOTED: evin B. Northcraft City Manager Respe fully submitted, 1-a Bre .. er Planning Aide 2 June 13, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council June 28, 1988 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - MAY 1988 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. Administration To coordinate and blend the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City -Manager; includes engineering and administration of capital improvement projects. Permits Issued: Type This Last FY Year FY Month Month To -date 86-87 Sewer Demolition 7 3 42 51 Sewer Lateral 0 1. 26 43 Street Excavation/ Construction 8 9 103 144 Utility Co's only 19 15 255 305 Dumpster/Lumber Drop 3 4 19 23 Engineering Status of Current Capital Improvement Projects: CIP 85-102/FAU Widen Highland: Submitted to Caltrans for review on February 16, 1988. Additional soils testing required by Cal- trans. Expecting approval by Council mid-July for authorization to bid. CIP 85-138/FAU Various Traffic Signal Improvements: Bids received April 14, 1988. Expect Council approval to award con- tract mid-June. CIP 85-160/Concrete Street Repairs: Contract awarded to Ruiz Engineering Company, the low bidder. Work to start approximately June 27, 1988. CIP 87-165/Bicycle Path Repairs: Contract awarded to Neff Con- tracting Corp., the low bidder. Work to start approximately June 15, 1988 and to end July 15, 1988. 1 CIP 87-171/Asphalt Street Repairs: Contract awarded to Vernon - Paving at a cost not to exceed $82,500. "Remove & replace" work completed June 8, 1988. Crack sealing to continue from mid-June to early July. CIP 85-203/Pier Grounding System: Construction began May 11, 1988. Anticipate Council to accept as complete mid-June. CIP 87-302/Beach Drive Sewer/Storm Drain Improvements: Construc- tion began April 25, 1988. Anticipate completion by July 1, • 1988. CIP 87-405/City-Wide Sewer Replacement: In design. Anticipate City Council authorization to bid July 12, 1988. CIP 85-502/Prospect Park: Council accepted as complete on May 24, 1988. ' CIP 87-507/Clark Field Tennis Court Resurfacing:* Council accepted as complete on May 10, 1988. CIP 86-602/Electrical Improvement Upgrade -City Hall: Contract awarded to Shultz Electric April 16, 1988. Anticipate construction to begin mid-June 1988.. CIP 87-606/Police Department Remodel: Construction started on May 2 - anticipate completion date July 16, 1988. Contract is for 75 days. Maintenance - Parks/Medians: To operate effective landscape maintenance and landscape for all City planted areas and provide upkeep of irrigation systems within the City medians and parks. - Street Maintenance/Sanitation: Includes the repair and maintenance of streets, alleys, sidewalks, curbs and gutters; street sweeping and cleaning of streets, alleys and parking lots. - Sewer and Storm Drains: Maintenance of sewers, storm drains and City sanitary sewer pump stations; installation of new laterals for new construction. - Street Lighting: Maintenance and installation of City-wide' street lighting, including liaison with electric utility. - Traffic Safety: To ensure the installation and maintenance of all mandated traffic control devices and necessary appurtenances. 2 - Building Maintenance: Custodial care and maintenance of City buildings. - Remodeling projects at Base 3 and the Police Department computer room in the - Equipment Service: Repair & maintenance of all City vehicles and equipment. Respectfully submitted, ony Antich Director of iP mon/m lic Works 3 Noted: Kevin B. Northc'raft City Manager Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 20, 1988 City Council Meeting of June 28, 1988 GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MAY ACTIVITY REPORT Parking Cites Issued Vehicles Impounded/Booted •Calls Responded To Booting Revenue Citations Issued Warnings Issued Complaints Responded To Total Number of Animals Picked -Up of which: PARKING ENFORCEMENT 5/87 10,170 72 188 $8,079 Returned to Owner Taken to Shelter Injured, taken to Vet Deceased CONCUR: J64n Noon, Director General Services Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager ANIMAL CONTROL 31 .0 30 39 12 12 2 13 5/88 8,518 82 75 $10,857 43 0 51 51 11 21 6 13 YTD 36,37Z 247 535 $34,900 303 0 219 245' 67 84 12 82 Respectfully submitted, Joan Noon, Director byGce). % Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT ************* NEWS ************* Cable TV Udate Multivisions, in an effort to improve service, has instituted a new operational procedure. They have basically established the Anaheim Office as a central office. All customer service calls, both request for service and complaints, for Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach, are patched through to the central office. Calls are then dispatched to the Hermosa Beach Office, via computer. This is not an uncommon practice, in service operations. Multivision has indicated to us that they feel they will have better control, supervision, etc., under this new system. However, as with all new systems, they haven't quite worked out all the bugs yet. The system has been in place for approximately three weeks and worked quite well until they advertised a new promotion for•the "Z" channel. Then, as things go with the best laid plans, their arrangements proved to be inadequate and the complaints started rolling into City Hall. ' We have had several conversations with Multivision management regarding this matter and they assure us that things will improve. We hope that this information will be of benefit to you in the event you receive calls from your constituents. Honorable Mayor and June 20, 1988 Members of the City Council ACTIVITY REPORT DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY MAY, 1988 Attached for your information are recap sheets of department ac- tivity for the month of May. Overall permit activity remained steady during May as the depart- ment issued 67 permits of which 31 were building permits. Two permits were issued for single family dwellings, two permits were issued for duplexes and one permit was issued for a four unit apartment structure. Five dwelling units were demolished resulting in a net increase of three dwelling units. Building Department general fund revenue for 91.66% of the fiscal year is $308,041.12 or 92.5% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. The Business License division reports that 125 licenses were is- sued during May resulting in revenue of $21,295.16. Business license revenue to date is $400,208.06 or 80.17 of the projected revenue for the fiscal year. The department logged 20 new code enforcement complaints during' May of which four were for suspected illegal dwelling units. The department abated two illegal units and closed two other cases during May and has 35 illegal dwelling unit cases under investigation. Noted: evin 8. Nort raft City Manager Respectfully Submitted, William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT Month Ending May, 1988 NUMBER OF PERMITS Building 30 Plumbing 24 Electric 16 Plan Check 13 Sewer Use 1 Res. Bldg.Reports 44 Comm. Inspections 12 Parks & Recreation 1 In lieu Park & Rec. . 0 Board of Appeals 0 Sign. Review 4 LAST MONTH THIS MONTH 31 19 17 14 3 41 20 2 1 0 2 THIS YEAR TO DATE 303 285 228 129 43 366 227 8 25 8 27 THIS MONTH LAST YEAR 27 35 31 4 4 72 16 0 1 3 LAST YEAR TO DATE 388 372 353 151 148 418 146 99 20 23 TOTALS 145 150 1,649 193 2,118 FEES Bui ding** Plumbing Electric Plan Check Sewer Use* Res. Bldg. Reports Comm. Inspections Parks & Recreation In lieu Park & Rec. Board of Appeals Sign Review 5,280.40 1,791.00 2,614.00 8,518.00 342.55 1,720.00 300.00 3,500.00 0 0 100.00 18,809.63 1,622.00 2,103.00 8,196.25 1,316.11 1,640.00 500.00 21,000.00 6,534.00 0 50.00 131,309.81 26,044.50 34,365.00 94,942.01 20,491.88 14,430.00 5,675.00 56,000.00 165,617.00 600.00 675.00 3,958.02 305,455.02 2,389.00 41,403.00 3,943.00 49,953.00 989.25 131,865.25 235.00 '27,155.00 1,800.00 15,620.00 400.00 3,675.00 0 226,500.00 75.00 1,500.00 75.00 757.00 TOTAL .2 :0 . 0 .27 'VALUATIONS 349,995 1,998,266 12,378,177 198,002 33,399,829 nctuoes reruns �. **Includes State Seismic Fee $153.03 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED Month of May, 1988 TYPE OF STRUCTURE DWELLING UNITS PERMITS PROVIDED VALUATION 1. Single Dwellings 2 2 $ 207,815 2. Duplex Dwellings 2 4 392,889 3. Triplex Dwellings 4. Four Units 1 4 452,000 5. Five Units or More 6. Commercial Buildings 7. Industrial Buildings 8... Publicly Owned Buildings 9. Garages - Residential 10. Accessory Buildings 11. Fences and Walls 2 900 12. Swimming Pools 1 16,500 13. Alterations, additions or repairs to dwellings 12 216,320 14. Alterations, additions or ' repairs to Commercial Bldgs. 3 533,530 15. Alterations, additions or repairs to indus. bldgs. 16. Alterations, additions or repairs to publicly owned bldgs. 1 (alteration to P.D.-fee waived), 17. Alterations, additions, repairs to garages or accessory bldgs. 1 3;312 18. Signs 19. Dwelling units moved 20. Dwelling units demolished 5 21. All other permits not listed 1 (demo commercial structure) TOTAL PERMITS 31 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: $1,998,266 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED : 8 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DEMOLISHED: 5 NET CHANGE: +3 NET DWELLING UNIT CHANGE FY 87/88 +29 CUMULATIVE DWELLING UNIT TOTAL: 10,018 (INCLUDES PERMITS ISSUED) BUSINESS LICENSE REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MAY 1988 TO: Wm. Grove, Building & Safety Director FROM: Mary Fehskens, Administrative Aide DATE: June 6, 1988 NEW BUSINESS LICENSES ISSUED: Out of City License Issued: Home Occupation License Issued: New Business' Opened: New Owners of Existing Business: TOTAL NUMBER OF LICENSES ISSUED: BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWALS MAILED: DELINQUENT NOTICES MAILED: NEW & RENEWAL LICENSES ISSUED: REPORTS SOLD: BUSINESS LICENSE REVENUE: BUSINESS LICENSE REVENUE YEAR-TO-DATE: 18 13 4 1 36 157 189 125' 0 $21,295.16 $400,208.06 June 15, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council June 28, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES MAY, 1988 ACTIVITY REPORT The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of May. SPECIAL EVENTS May•12th the Children's Thursday Theatre Series closed with "Mountains and Molehills" by the South Coast Repertory Company. Attendance was over 250. May 28 -29th the Men's A Volleyball Tournament was held at the Hermosa Beach Pier. 45 teams participated (doubling participation from last year). $450 in entry fees were collected. Cheese distribution was held on May 20th. 240 people were serviced. FILMING May 13-15 Oliver Wilson Productions rented the Civic Theatre to film a Show Time Comedy Special. Revenue to the City for this activity was $1,787.00. It is noteworthy that they rented a portable air conditioning system for the shows at the cost of $8,500. Adding air-conditioning fy 88-89 will enable the theatre to be used for videotape and film production thore often. • Three (3) film permits were processed in May. COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION • May 7th, the Romeros Classic Guitar Quartet performed to a sold -out audience. The show was extremely well-received. • Ticket sales closed for the sold -out season finale of Diane Schuur with Fritz Coleman and Paul Kozak. • All Foundation shows in the 1988 series with the exception of the Gala sold -out. It is clear the Civic Theatre is gaining recognition as a viable center for performing arts. • May 28 -30th the Foundation had a booth at the Fiesta de las Artes to sell posters and solicit memberships for the foundation. CIVIC THEATRE . RFP's for 16mm projectors and an electric motion picture screen were distributed. It is hoped we can install a system over the summer and implement its use for FY 88-89. SUMMER PARK PROGRAM 3,000 flyers were distributed to schools in Hermosa Beach and to local public libraries. A program director was .hired as well as ten park leaders (some from JTPA program). The session begins on June 27th. Registration is currently at 60. The program will be limited to 350 registrants. MEETINGS Staff attended the following meetings: Commission, City Council•, Foundation, Surf Festival Committee, SCAATS, Oliver Wilson Productions, JPTA and nine (9) event planning meetings. 0 FACILITY RESERVATIONS In May we received approximately 40 calls per week regarding facility reservations. New reservations this month include: Jewish Community Center, IMA concerts 1988-89, International Bilingual School, Los Cancioneros, Lopez Sweet 16 Party, Watts Reception, IBS: French Reception, Freedman Basketball and four Superkids birthday parties. COMMUNITY CENTER MEETING ROOMS California Film & Movie Traffic School Hope Chapel Community Center Foundation Community Center Advisory Board Sister Cities Teen Advocate City Testing Friends of the Arts LA School District Pre/post exercise class Chamber of Commerce Family Crisis Center Muslim Community Center Friends of the Arts COMMUNITY., CENTER,GYMNASIUM Cooley Basketball Colen Basketball F.O.T.A Project Touch Little League Mt Cheese Distribt. COMMUNITY CENTER LEASES Easter Seals General Services Cascio Basketball Thegze Basketball Wohn Basketball Easter Seals Paton Basketball Botelho Basketball ARC Special Olympics Youth Basketball Cohen Basketball SuperKids Gymnasitcs Olsen Basketball DeMoss Basketball Pacific Conference Basketball League Little League - Las Vegas Night Freedman Basketball Superkids Gym 4 parties Project Touch Palmer Drug Abuse Salvation Army So. Bay Free Clinic Teen Advocate Center Historical Society Association for Retarded Citizens (ARC) Hope Chapel COMMUNITY CENTER THEATRE The fiscal year schedule for the use of the theatre is attached. It reflects tentative as well as confirmed reservations. However, below, we will continue to list the actual events that took place in the theatre for the month. Hope Chapel (weekly) Bishop Montgomery H. S. Community Center Foundation Church of Jesus Christ Latter Day Saints "Hugo" Ugolini Concert Los Cancioneros CLARK BUILDING We average three private parties per month in addition to the following weekly/monthly meetings. Jazzercise Aerobics Senior Exercise Senior Club Meeting Garden Club Women's Club Sunday AA meeting Monday AA meeting South Bay Unity Church Top Notchers Square Dance Club International Bilingual School South Bay Light Opera TRW Party CLARK .FIELD Little League Slow Pitch Oliver Wilson Production H. B. School District, VALLEY PARK RESERVATIONS January -April, 1987 17 May -September, 1987 50 October, 1987 15 November, 1987 1 December, 1987 1 January, 1988 1 February, 1988 0 March, 1988 4 April, 1988 7 May, 1988 7 DEPARTMENT REVENUE: Attached Noted: '(evi'n B. North8raft City Manager Respectfully submitted, . gastrian Director Dept. of Community Resources JUNE JULY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES UPCOMING SPECIAL EVENTS • Men's Masters CBVA Volleyball Tournament ▪ Diane Schuur Concert (Civic Theatre) • Dad's Day Dash • Love Your Heart 10K race (American Heart Assn) • Voting • Opening Day - Summer Park Program • Kiwanis Club Soap Box Derby • Women's Professional Volleyball Tournament • Concerts on the Green (Community Center) AUGUST . Women'.s Open CBVA Volleyball Tournament . Women's Professional Volleyball Tournament . Concerts on the Green (Community Center) . Surf Festival Fishing Derby . Surf Festival Power'Lounging SEPTEMBER • Fiesta De Las Artes (Foundation Fundraising • Concerts on the Green (Community Center) • Men's Professional Volleyball Tournament • Richstone Center Walk-a-thon • Cheese Distribution • Hunger Project 10K Race Booth) DATE CIVIC THEATRE SCHEDULE MAY, 1988 THROUGH DECEMBER, 1988 GROUP May 1 May 2 thru 7 May 12 May 13 & 14 May 15 May 25 May 26 May 31 May June 4 June 5 June 6 thru 11 June 17 June 22, 23 June 24 June . July 31 Bishop Montgomery HS (School Play) Foundation (Romero Brothers - Prep/Show) Children's Theatre Series "Mountains and Molehills" Oliver Wilson Operatic Concert Bishop Montgomery HS (Talent Show - Rehearsal) Bishop Montgomery HS (Talent Show — Performance) Los Cancioneros (Choir - Rehearsal) Hope Chapel (Services) Los Cancioneros (Choir - Spring Concert) Patty Neal: Children's Dance Recital Foundation (Schuur - Prep/Show) Hermosa Beach School District (School Assembly) TIME 6:00 - 10:00 pm Varies 4:00 - 6:00 Pm All day 3:00 - 10:00 pm 5:00 - 10:00 pm 5:00 - 10:00 pm 7:00 - 10:00 pm 7:30 am -12:30 pm Sundays 7:00 - 10:00 pm 1:00 - 6:00 pm Varies TBD Hermosa Beach School District 9:00 (Graduation - Setup/Rehearsal) Hermosa Beach School District 6:00 (Graduation) Hope Chapel (Services) Jewish Community Cneter am - Noon - 10:00 pm 7:30 am -12:30 pm Sundays 7:00 pm -11:00 pm July Hope Chapel (services) 7:30 - 12:30 pm Sundays Aug. Hope Chapel (services) 7:30 - 12:30 pm Sundays Sept. Hope Chapel (services) 7:30 - 12:30 pm Sundays Oct 9 Police Dept. D.A.R.E All day Oct 18 & 23 Los Cancioneros 5:00-10:00 pm• Oct 24 & 29 Poof Too! All day Oct Hope Chapel (services) 7:30 - 12:30 pm Sundays Nov Hope Chapel (services) 7:30 - 12:30 pm Sundays Nov 6 & 10 Los Cancioneros 5:00-10:00 pm Dec Hope Chapel (services) 7:30 - 12:30 pm Sundays 1989 June 6 & 11 Los Cancioneros 5:00-10:00 pm DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES REVENUE/EXPENDITURES 1987/88 MAY, 1988 COMMUNITY CENTER RENTALS COMMUNITY CENTER LEASES COMMUNITY CENTER THEATRE CLARK BUILDING SPECIAL EVENTS TENNIS COURTS. REVENUE TO DATE: REVENUE $1,275.00 4,731.00 2,297.50 2,396.25 2,820.00 882.00 $14,394.75 5/88 • 5/87 $169,407.86 $175,008.24 REVENUE PROJECTION: PRESENT FISCAL YEAR: $193,500 REVENUE: ACTUAL: LAST FISCAL YEAR: $195,988 COMMUNITY RESOURCES DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND REVENUE FOR 91 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR IS $169,407.86 OR .8 8 % OF THE PROJECTED FIGURE. COMMUNITY RESOURCES EXPENDITURES FOR 91 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR IS. 77 % OR $, 244,835 DEPT. OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES REVENUE TO DATE MAY, 31, 1988 1986-87 . 1987-88 COMMUNITY CENTER RENTALS $50,178.13 $41,760.50 COMMUNITY CENTER LEASES $47,090.50 $56,507.54 COMMUNITY CENTER THEATRE $11,966.25 $15,370.37 CLARK BUILDING* $29,260.41 $24,960.50 SPECIAL EVENTS* $25,344.15 $20,380.70 TENNIS COURTS $11,168.80 $10 ,428.25 $175,008.24 $169,407.86 *Finance report groups these two categories under the heading "Other Facilities". 1