Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/14/88"Praise, if you don't swallow it, can't hurt you." -Mort Walker AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 14, 1988 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 6:30 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR Etta Simpson MAYOR PRO TEM Jim Rosenberger COUNCILMEMBERS Roger Creighton Chuck Sheldon June Williams CITY CLERK Kathleen Midstokke CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY James P. Lough All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: a44.-ee PROCLAMATIONS: Commendation for Redondo Union High School's Distinguished Schools Award National Flag Day, June 14, 1988 JOINT PRESENTATION BY COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION AND COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION RE. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES OF BOTH ORGANIZATIONS. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar or within the jurisdiction of the Council not elsewhere considered on the agenda may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the item is called. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are request- ed to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed (a) (b) (c) (e) (f) (i) (j) will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) Recommendation to approve minutes 1) Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on May 19, 1988. 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on May 24, 1988. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Recommendation to receive and file monthly investment report for May, 1988. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated June 6, 1988. Recommendation to request funds from the County Sanita- tion District in order to determine public interest pro- gram goals, recovery and marketing potential and to per- form a preliminary economic analysis of a City recycling program. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated June 7, 1988. Recommendation to accept work as complete - Pier ground- ing repairs (CIP 85-203),. authorize staff to release $27,329 Cashier's Check submitted by Parker Diving Ser- vice in lieu of Labor and Materials and Faithful Perfor- mance Bonds, and authorize staff to file Notice of Com- pletion. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 31, 1988. Recommendation to receive and file review of tennis court operations at the Community Center. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated June 6, 1988. Recommendation to receive and file memorandum from Plan- ning Commission to City Council noting concern of delay of noise enforcement. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 6, 1988. Recommendation to award agreements and authorize Mayor to sign with 1) Steiny & Co. Inc. for construction of traffic signal improvements in an amount not to exceed $157,190, and 2) with Mohler Grover & Assoc. for inspec- tion and administration svcs. for a cost not to exceed $17,600; authorize staff to issue change orders and ad- denda as necessary (CIP 85-138). Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 6, 1988. Recommendation to receive and file report on permits for live bands and amplified sound. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated June 8, 1988. - 2 - (m) (n) (P) Recommendation to receive and file status report on City Hazardous Waste Management Program and County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated May 17, 1988. (Con- tinued by Councilmember Williams from 5/24/88 mtg.) Recommendation to authorize purchase of Hewlett Packard Eagle Disc Drive. Memorandum from General Services Di- rector Joan Noon dated June 2, 1988. Recommendation to convert the City Hall telephone system to Direct -in -dialing (DID). Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated June 7, 1988. Recommendation to accept and acknowledge gifts to City from Beach Cities Cycle (police bicycles); and from a Hermosa Beach family (Greenbelt Park benches). Memoran- dum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 7, 1988. Recommendation to approve lease agreement for rental of city -owned property at 74 -14th Street. Memorandum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated May 17, 1988. Recommendation to authorize City Manager to sign revised month-to-month contract with RCC. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated June 8, 1988. ***************************************************************** MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READINGS After the City Clerk has read the title to any resolution or or- dinance on tonight's agenda, the further reading thereof be waived, reserving and guaranteeing to each Councilmember the right to demand the reading of any such resolution or ordinance in regular order. ***************************************************************** 2. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (a) ORDINANCE NO. 88-922 -.AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 2-2.16, ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL. For adoption. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 88-929 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE ARTICLE V SECTIONS PERTAINING TO COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR DINING ENCROACHMENT PERMITS. For adoption. (c) ORDINANCE NO. 88-930 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR AREAS DESCRIBED AND SHOWN ON ATTACHED MAPS AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. (d) ORDINANCE NO. 88-932 - AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A FIRE FLOW FEE TO UPGRADE FIRE PROTECTION AND TO ASSIST CON- STRUCTION PROJECTS TO MEET UNIFORM FIRE CODE REQUIRE- MENTS. For adoption. 3 (e) A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICER ASSOCIATION, OFFICERS AND SERGEANTS BARGAINING UNIT. For adoption. Memoran- dum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated June 9, 1988. (f) A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH COMMANDERS BARGAINING UNIT. For adop- tion. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Black- wood dated June 13,1988. (g) A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP #18895 FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 518 ELEVENTH STREET. For adoption. Memorandum from Planning Direc- tor Michael Schubach dated June 6, 1988. (h) A•RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL AP- PROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1988-89. For adoption. Memorandum from Finance Administrator Viki Copeland dated June 9, 1988. (i) AN ORDINANCE REPEALING LEGALLY INCONSISTENT AND SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE ORDINANCES FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE. For introduction. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated May 26, 1988. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. APPEAL OF LOT MERGERS: A. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO NOT MERGE LOTS LOCATED AT 1254 - 20TH STREET WITH PROPOSED RESOLUTION. (Continued from 5/24/88 meeting.) B. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO NOT MERGE LOTS LOCATED AT 1224 - 20TH PLACE WITH PROPOSED RESOLUTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 16, 1988. 6. A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR TICKET SALES AT 727 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY - MUSIC PLUS. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 17, 1988 with supplemental report dated June 9, 1988. B. ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION APPROVING ZONE CHANGE FROM R-2, C -POTENTIAL TO C-3 WITH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVAL AS TO FORM OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 720 8TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK A, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated May 18, 1988. (Continued from 5/24/88 meeting.) 7. PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-1989: Memorandum from Finance Administrator Viki Copeland dated June 7, 1988. A. ADOPT RESOLUTION FIXING THE COMPENSATION OF THE CITY CLERK FOR FY 1988-89. B. CONSIDER RESOLUTION FIXING THE COMPENSATION OF THE CITY TREASURER FOR FY 1988-89. C. APPROVE USE OF GENERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $39,000 FOR CIP 85-160, CONCRETE STREET REPAIRS. D. ADOPT RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1988-89. 8. PROPOSED RESOLUTION FOR FY 1988-89 STREET LIGHTING DIS- TRICT ASSESSMENT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 16, 1988. 9. PROPOSED ORDINANCE FOR HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1988-89. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 16, 1988. 10. PROPOSED EXTENSION OF URGENCY FIRE FLOW ORDINANCE AND CONTINUANCE OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum from City Attorney James P. Lough dated June 9, 1988. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 11. RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE ALTERNATIVE HOURS OF OPERA- TION FOR CITY HALL OFFICES. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated May 16, 1988. (Con- tinued from 5/24/8q meeting.) 12. REPORT ON STA F STUDY OF PARKING REMOV .+` THE WEST SIDE OF PACI OAST HIGHWAY BETWEEN 3 P AND 7 P.M. Memorandum Public Works Director ny Antich dated June , 1988. 13. RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE DELETING R-2 AND R-3 USES FROM BILTMORE SITE APPRAISAL. Memorandum from City Man- ager Kevin B. Northcraft dated June 7, 1988. 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 15. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Request by Councilmember Williams to be appointed the delegate to the Beach Cities Coalition for Drug Free Youth. (Oral) (b) Request by Councilmember Creighton to consider 2 dwell- ing unit per lot limit on any lot within R-2 zone. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 9, 1988. rWe-z4 CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. /. i CITY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by visitor/users; led/by a City Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers .. . THE'HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach bas the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The - Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration •is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY • The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on•certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City -Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government•revenues and/or public conduct. All .• ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week later'Council•may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting. Miscellaneous Items and Reports .,.City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of the City Council may place items on'the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business -district. (c) Status report re. railroad right-of-way. (Reserved on agenda in case there is new information to report.) (d) Preparation of ballot measures. (Reserved on agenda in case there is new information to report.) 16. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Vacancies - Boards and Commissions Planning Commission - 2 Commissioners for terms ending June 30, 1992. ADJOURNMENT 6 MOP MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, May 24, 1988 at the hour of 7:46 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - 6:00 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section No. 54956.9 to discuss matters of litigation - Abarca, Martinez, et al vs. Hermosa Beach, Gotanda/Coast Savings vs. Hermosa Beach, Hermosa Beach School District vs. Hermosa Beach, Real Property negotiations involving the City drill site, and School District property at South School. ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson Absent: None PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - George Schmeltzer ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CLOSED SESSION None PROCLAMATIONS: Traffic Safety Week, May 22 - 28, 1988 PRESENTATION TO MANHATTAN/HERMOSA BEACH GIRLS DIVISION 4 ALL-STAR TEAM, AYSO SOCCER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAMPIONS Mayor Simpson announced that agenda items 8, 9 and 11 would be continued to the City Council meeting of June 14, 1988. CITIZEN COMMENTS Parker Herriott re ML Media public access channel - wants no paid advertisements. Michael Flaharty, 408 - 31st Street, asked to speak to item 11 which had been continued - advised he should wait until item is heard. Albert Wiemans, 336 - 24th Street, asked that item 2(b) Ordinance No. 88-927, rezoning of certain areas) be heard after item 5. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (p) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for further discussion but are listed Minutes 5-24-88 la (a) R-1". in order for clarity: (a3) Rosenberger, (e) Sheldon, (h) Creighton, (j) Sheldon, (k) Williams and (o) Sheldon. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Recommendation to approve minutes as follows: 1) Adjourned meeting of the City Council for workshop with Planning Commission held on April 7, 1988 (Continued from 5/10 meeting.) 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on April 26, 1988 (Continued from 5/10 meeting.) 3) Minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on May 10, 1988. Action: To approve minutes noting correction to May 10 minutes, page 11, line 5 deleting the words "in the Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered. (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 26302, 26394 through 26396 inclusive, 26439 through 26444 inclusive and 26446 through 26588 inclusive, noting voided Warrants Nos. 26446 through 26448 inclusive and 26464. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the monthly financial reports for March, 1988. (Continued from 5/10 meeting.) 1) Expenditure Report 2) Revenue Report 3) Treasurer's Report (e) (f) (g) Recommendation to receive and file the monthly financial reports for April, 1988. 1) Expenditure Report 2) Revenue Report 3) Treasurer's Report Action: To receive and file the monthly financial re- ports for April, 1988. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to receive and file status report of en- croachment permits. Memorandum from Public Works Direc- tor Anthony Antich dated May 3, 1988. (Continued from 5/10 meeting.) Recommendation to approve request for 30 day extension of temporary appointment - Police Records Administrator. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat- ed May 18, 1988. 2 Minutes 5-24-88 (h) (i) (j) • (k) Recommendation to appropriate $7,000 from Prospective Expenditures into City Manager budget to cover Profes- sional Services cost to reconcile State Recreation Grants. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian dated May 3, 1988. (Continued from 5/10 meeting.) Action: To appropriate $7,000 from Prospective Expendi- tures into the City Manager's budget to cover Profes- sional Services costs to reconcile State Recreation Grants. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Recommendation to approve procedures for handling assets which are seized and forfeited by Police Department. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated April 27, 1988. (Continued from 5/10 meeting.) Recommendation to approve agreement with General Tele- phone continuing pay telephones at 1 Pier Avenue and 540 Pier Avenue and authorize City Manager to sign. Memo- randum from General Services Director Joan Noon dated May 16, 1988. Action: To authorize the City Manager to sign the agreements for ongoing service and maintenance for the pay phones installed at 1 Pier Avenue and 540 Pier Avenue. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Recommendation to receive and file status report on City Hazardous Waste Management Program and County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated May 17, 1988. Action: To continue this item to the meeting of June 14, 1988. Motion Williams, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (1) Ratify action to begin appraisal of Biltmore site, ap- prove agreement with Michael Vizzini Associates for ap- praisal, and appropriate $10,000 from Prospective Expen- ditures. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. North - craft dated May 18, 1988. (m) Recommendation for acceptance of work as complete - Edith Rodaway Friendship Park (CIP 85-502); authorize staff to release the 10% retention payment, less costs for additional landscape maintenance services from an- other contractor; release the Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Materials Bond from Landscape West. Memo- randum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 17, 1988. 3 Minutes 5-24-88 (n) (o) (p) Recommendation to deny claim and refer to City's Claims Administrator the claim of: 1) Hans Eric Yeager, 7236 W. 90th Street, Westchester, CA 90045, filed 5/5/88 - loss of sunglasses after police search. Approval of retainer agreement for independent legal opinion on permitted uses of Biltmore Site and appropri- ate $5,000 from Prospective Expenditures. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated May 18, 1988. Action: To approve the retainer agreement for an in- dependent legal opinion on permitted uses of the Bilt- more Site, authorize the City Manager to sign the agree- ment, and appropriate $3,000 from Prospective Expendi- tures for this purpose. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Accept and file Planning Commission memo re. west side of P.C.H. driving lane - separate issue from circulation element. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 18, 1988. MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING Action: To waive further reading of any ordinance or resolution on this evening's agenda. Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - None 2. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (a) ORDINANCE NO. 88-926 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE I, "ADMINISTRATION" SECTION 2-3 AND CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE IIA, "DIRECTOR OF FINANCE", SECTION 2-22.4 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY REVISING THE METHOD OF FIXING THE AMOUNT OF BOND FOR THE CITY CLERK, CITY TREASURER, AND DIRECTOR OF FINANCE. For adoption.• Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88-926. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 88-927 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREAS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. (2A, 2B AND 2C TO R-1). For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88-927. Motion Williams, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (c) RESOLUTION NO. 88-5146 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PARKING RESOLUTION 4 Minutes 5-24-88 N.S. 2435, ESTABLISHING A LOADING ZONE (ON SOUTH CURB OF FIRST PLACE AT PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY) AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 85-4841. For adoption. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 16, 1988. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5146 . Motion Williams, second Rosenberger. So ordered. (d) ORDINANCE NO. 88-922 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2-2.16, ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL. For re -introduction. Memorandum from City Clerk Kath- leen Midstokke dated May 18, 1988. Action: To reintroduce Ordinance No. 88-922. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. (e) PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE ARTICLE V SECTIONS PERTAINING TO COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR DINING EN- CROACHMENT PERMITS. For introduction. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 12, 1988. Action: To direct staff to institute across-the-board standards for businesses that use City land and require an encroachment permit as soon as possible, and the En- croachment Permit fee should approximate the fair market value as determined by a survey of the area. Motion Sheldon, second Williams. So ordered. Final Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 88-929 enti- tled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE ARTICLE V. ENCROACHMENTS." Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. (f) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE BEACH CITIES COALITION FOR ALCOHOL AND DRUG FREE YOUTH. Memorandum from Steve S. Wisniewski, Director of Public Safety dated May 24, 1988. Action: To hear this item as the need arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - None Final Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5147 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA IN SUPPORT OF THE BEACH CITIES COALI- TION FOR ALCOHOL AND DRUG FREE YOUTH." Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. 5 Minutes 5-24-88 Action: To move to Public Hearings and to hear item 6 prior to hearing item 5. Motion Sheldon, second Williams AYES - Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams NOES - Creighton, Mayor Simpson 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Consent Calendar items a-3, e, h, j, k, and o were dis- cussed at this time but are listed in order on the Con- sent Calendar for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. None HEARINGS 5. CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED BALLOT MEASURE FOR THE NOVEMBER 8, 1988 ELECTION REGARDING DOWNZONING FOR DEN- SITY CONTROL TO MARE ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated May 18, 1988. Supplemental information - letters from Stephanie Solomon and Dennis Harmon, 2223 Manhattan Avenue and Robert Aprahamian, 230 - 24th Street dated May 19, 1988. The Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Parker Herriott Wilma Burt, 1152 - 7th Street George Schmeltzer, 515 - 24th Street Edie McFaden Webber Jerry Compton, 837 - 7th Street Leland Theroux, 1727 Golden Avenue Dean Nota, 2467 Myrtle Ave Bill Gray, 1115 - 17th Street Albert Wiemans, 336 - 34th Street Paul Normandy The Hearing was closed. Proposed Action: To have an advisory measure similar to EE brought back to Council by the City Attorney. Motion Mayor Simpson - no second to the motion Proposed Action: To put EE back on the ballot with a change to indicate property would be downzoned. Motion Creighton, second Mayor Simpson AYES - Creighton, Mayor Simpson NOES - Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams Motion fails PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6 - Minutes 5-24-88 6. REZONE OF AREA 9 FROM R-2 AND R-3 TO R-1 OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY CITY COUNCIL AND ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 18, 1988. Supplemental information - letters from Mr. & Mrs. Lawrence Burritt, 535 Hollowell dated May 17, 1988 Arthur O. Morse, 805 Prospect Avenue, dated May 16, 1988, Michael R. Smith and Kathryn L. Hadden -Smith, 715 Prospect Avenue dated May 17, 1988, Jim Sullivan and Sandra Essex, 1051 - 8th Street dated May 17, 1988 and Bob Parker, 1413 Prospect Avenue. The staff report was presented by Planning Director Michael Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak regarding Area 9A were: Albert Wiemans, 336 - 24th Street Wilma Burt, 1152 - 7th Street Don Kistler, 917 - 6th Street Joel Shapiro Mark Lucor, 206 Prospect Jim Heck, 1255 - 7th Place Parker Herriott Robert Hart, Ocean Drive Gary Burritt & Steve Vollucci, 436-438 Hollowell Tom Miller, 839 - 7th Street Don Sellers, 320 Prospect Avenue - read letter into the record Leland Theroix, 1727 Golden Avenue Coming forward to speak regarding Area 9B were: Richard & Donna Bartz, 901 - 5th Street Dana Shaw, 913 - 5th Street Mike Smith, 715 Prospect Avenue Phil Donatelli, 456 Ocean View Jim Sullivan, 1051 - 8th Street David Richmond, 1065 - 7th Street Parker Herriott Robert Hart, Ocean Drive Jim Halsey, 935 - 7th Street The Public Hearing was closed. Action: To rezone Area 9A from R-2 to R-1 and Area 9B from R-2 to R -2B except for areas currently zoned R-3, and introduce Ordinance No. 88-930 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION" with changes to page 1, line 10 to read "Rezone area 9B from R-2 to R -2B except for areas currently zoned R-3:" 7 Minutes 5-24-88 line 23 deleting portion 9, and line 24 dominium Tract Map #38826. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, NOES - Williams A recess was called at 10:40 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 10:55 P.M. deleting Con - Mayor Simpson 7. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF AN INTERIM EMERGENCY OR- DINANCE AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A FIRE FLOW FEE TO UPGRADE FIRE PROTECTION TO ASSIST OWNERS OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS TO MEET FIRE CODE RE- QUIREMENTS. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated May 18, 1988. Supplemental in- formation - letter from H. Longacre dated May 22, 1988. The staff report was presented by Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski and Walt Delcene, California Water Ser- vice Company. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Jim Anderson, 3221 Morningside Drive Wilma Burt, 1152 - 7th Street Jerry Compton, 832 - 7th Street Parker Herriott Howard Longacre, 1221 - 7th Place - read letter into the record Moira Nelson, 2415 Silverstrand Evan Wright, 2215 Hermosa Avenue The Public Hearing was closed. Action: To adopt Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 88-931 entitled "AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ESTABLISHING A FIRE FLOW FEE TO UPGRADE FIRE PROTECTION AND TO ASSIST CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS TO MEET UNIFORM FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS" as amended by Council. Motion Rosenberger, second Simpson AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Mayor Simpson NOES - Williams Further Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 88-932 enti- tled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ES- TABLISHING A FIRE FLOW FEE TO UPGRADE FIRE PROTECTION AND TO ASSIST CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS TO MEET UNIFORM FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS" as amended by Council. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered. 8 Minutes 5-24-88 Further Action: To appropriate $10,000 from prospective expenditures to fund the City portion for the remainder of FY 87-88. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Final Action: To direct staff to request consultant proposals for study and recommendations for long term solutions to the fire flow issue. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered. 8. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO NOT MERGE LOTS LOCATED AT 1254 - 20TH STREET WITH PROPOSED RESOLUTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 16, 1988. The Public Hearing was opened. Action: To continue this item to the City Council meet- ing of June 14, 1988. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. 9. A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR TICKET SALES AT 727 PACIFIC COAST HIGH- WAY - MUSIC PLUS. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 17, 1988. B. ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-2, C -POTENTIAL TO C-3 WITH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVAL AS TO FORM OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 720 8TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK A, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT. (Continued from 3/8/88 meeting.) Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated May 18, 1988. The Public Hearing was opened. Action: To continue this item to the City Council meet- ing of June 14, 1988. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. 10. PROPOSED RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF COMMUTER TRANSPORTA- TION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO SERVE COMMUTERS BOUND FOR THE EL SEGUNDO EMPLOYMENT CENTER SPONSORED BY THE CITIES OF HERMOSA BEACH, REDONDO BEACH, RANCHO PALOS VERDES, TORRANCE, EL SEGUNDO, LAWNDALE, LOS ANGELES AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 12, 1988. The staff report was presented by Planning Director Michael Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. No one coming forward, the Public Hearing was closed. 9 Minutes 5-24-88 Action: To approve the staff recommendation as follows: 1. Approve allocation of Proposition A Funds to imple- ment Phase 1, Alternative #2 of the Commuter Transporta- tion Plan at a cost of $120,000.00 for a three-year com- mitment @ $40,000.00 a year. 2. Approve Resolution No. 88-5148 entitled "A RESOLU- TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE CITY OF TORRANCE FOR FY 1988-89 PROPOSITION A DISCRETIONARY FUNDS UNDER THE INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR THE COMMUTER TRANSPORTATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN." 3. Appoint Councilmember Creighton as the delegate and Councilmember Rosenberger as the alternate to represent the City on the Commuter Transportation Implementation Plan Steering Committee. 4. Approve the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to act as lead agency in the administration of the program. 5. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding in concept only for the City of Rancho Palos Verdes to operate the program subject to the City Attorney's review, and au- thorize Mayor to sign. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 11. RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE ALTERNATIVE HOURS OF OPERA- TION FOR CITY HALL OFFICES. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated May 16, 1988. Continued to June 14, 1988 City Council meeting. 12. REPORT ON DAMAGE AND REPAIRS TO THE PIER FROM JANUARY, 1988 STORM. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated May 17, 1988. Action: To authorize staff to solicit proposals for engineering services to evaluate the extent of damage to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier and to determine the appropriate corrective measures necessitated by the January 17, 1988 storm. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered. Final Action: Adopted Resolution No. 88-5149 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DESIGNATING THE CITY MANAGER AS THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFOR- NIA FOR ALL MATTERS PERTAINING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY." Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered. - 10 - Minutes 5-24-88 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) Authorization to pursue a joint meeting between the City Council and the Hermosa Beach City School District. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated May 18, 1988. Action: To authorize staff to arrange for a joint City Council/School District meeting at the earliest prac- ticable time. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Status report re. railroad right-of-way. (Reserved on agenda in case there is new information to report.) None 15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL (a) R-2 Limit - Creighton Councilmember Creighton requested that this matter be placed on the next City Council agenda. ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday,. May 25, 1988 at the hour of 2:00 A.M. to a Special Meeting to be held on Thursday, March 26, 1988 at the hour of 6:00 P.M. C5 1,e.c..`. Deputy City C erk Minutes 5-24-88 COMERCIAL REAL ESTATE — SELECFION AAO LEASE 1ZA110NS FOR CHAN STORES ANO OTHERS June 10, 1988 Mr. Michael Schuback CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: 812 8TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA Dear Michael: JUN 1 1988 1429 4TH STREET SANTA MONICA CALIFORNIA 90401.2393 (213) 4518171 FAX (213) 3956361 The reason the applicant is requesting that the restriction on hours be removed from the specific plan to the C.U.P., is that the acquisition of the property cannot' be adequately financed with the specific plan encumbering the property, as opposed to restricting the operation of the Tenant. Please convey this to the City Manager, and any other people you feel would be appropriate. Bess egard GERRY OHEN GC/sl cc: Mark Wesley SAVE THE PIER & PAY COMMISSIONS PROMPTLY SVIVIEMENTAL INFORMATION s EOUNOING MEMBER OF CHAIN LINKS =r"'Ta=T 04 C w OFFICES IN: SAN DIEGO (619) 544-1449 SAN FRANCISCO (415) 673-1000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 7, 1988 City Council Meeting of June 14, 1988 Adoption of 1988-89 Budget RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council, as part of the 1988-89 budget process: A Adopt Resolution 88- fixing the compensation received by the City Clerk. B. Consider Resolution 88- fixing the compensation received by the City Treasurer C Approve use of General Revenue Sharing funds in the amount of $3.9,000 for CIP 85-160, Concrete Street Repairs as presented in the Capital Improvement Budget D Adopt Resolution 88- approving the budget and Capital Improvement Projects for fiscal year 1988-89 as presented in Exhibit A, "City of Hermosa Beach Budget Summary 1988-89" and incorporating the appropriation limitation and appropriations subject to the limitation. BACKGROUND CITY CLERK/CITY TREASURER COMPENSATION Compensation for the City Clerk and City Treasurer has been set annually by resolution. Per section 2-4.7 and 2-4.8 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, this is not necessary unless a change is under consideration. The attached resolutions have been revised so that annual adoption will not be required in subsequent fiscal years. The current compensation is $1,000 per month for City Clerk and $500 per month for City Treasurer. The City Treasurer is requesting an increase to $750 per month. Adoption of the attached resolution will enact this increase. The alternatives would be to leave the compensation as it is or select another amount. GENERAL REVENUE SHARING A public hearing is required prior to use of General Revenue Sharing Funds. The funds proposed for use are prior unused funds of $39,000 to be spent on Capital Improvement Project 85-160, Concrete Street Repairs. Since the Revenue Sharing program was discontinued by the federal government, no new funds are expected. ADOPTION OF 1988-89 BUDGET Budget workshops were held May 26th and May 31st. The following revisions to appropriations were suggested by a consensus of the City Council and are incorporated into the document(s) referenced. Revisions are highlighted. 1 1 ti DEPT/ACCT APPROPRIATIONS City Council City Council Planning Commission OBJECT REVISION CODE 4315 Delete National League of Cities $741, new total $4,559 4317 $1000/per Councilmember, new Conference total $5000 4317 Drop Chamber Retreat, add 1 commissioner to seminar attendees, Total remains $1,350 Additional revisions REVENUE UUT RR Right of Way Fund 67. UUT Fund Fire Prevention Fund APPROPRIATIONS Fire Hydrant Upgrade Data Processing TRANSFERS reflected are: 3401 Interest 3401 Interest 3912 Fire Flow Fees 4201 Contract Services /Private 4201 Contract Services /Private To Fire Protection Fund From 67, Utility User Tax Fund Estimated revenue Estimated revenue Estimated revenue $42,000 $56,000 $50,000 Estimated cost of hydrant upgrades $100,000 Lower cost of maintenance contracts, new total $93,000 Seed money, fire flow upgrade $50,000 Seed money, fire flow upgrade $50,000 2 DOCUMENT REFERENCE Budget Page 30-31 Budget Page 30-31 Budget Page 115 Budget Page 16 Budget Page 17 Budget Page 22 New Page Budget Page 53 & 55 Budget Page 8 Budget Page 9 The net change in the General Fund is a reduction in appropriations of $17,627 which results in an increase to both the estimated fund balance as of 6/30/89 and the designation for contingency in the same amount. The contingency represents 4.84% of the General Fund operating budget. Also attached are a revised Recap of Appropriations (Budget page 23), an Appropriation Summary by Fund as requested at the May 31st workshop, and revised Appropriations by Functions Charts for the General Fund and All Funds depicting Employee Benefits separate from the Management/Support function. The adopted budget, incorporating all of these revisions, will be printed and distributed the first week of July. Concur: Kevin B. Ndrthcraft City Manager Viki Copeland Finance Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE COMPENSATION TO BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY CLERK AND PROVIDING A JOB DESCRIPTION FOR SUCH COMPENSATION. WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the compensation for the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the matter of staffing and other job related duties have been reviewed by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to Ordinance No. 78-603 of the City Code of the City of Hermosa Beach, adopted December 14, 1978, the compensation of the City Clerk shall be fixed by a Resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 2. That the City Clerk'shall receive a salary of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per month payable semi- monthly at the same time and in the same manner as the salaries paid to each of the officers and employees of the City. SECTION 3. That the duties of the City Clerk shall be usual and statutory duties (excluding elections) including the duties specifically described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and titled "Partial List of City Clerk's Duties". SECTION 4. That said compensation as set forth in Section 2 of this Resolution shall be in full force and effect beginning 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 July 1, 1988 and remain in full force until such time as this Resolution is amended or repealed. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall be eligible for the same insurance and retirement benefits as the City Council. SECTION 5. That this Resolution supersedes City Council Resolution No. 87-5043 adopted June 9, 1987. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of June, 1987. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, Calif. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY PARTIAL LIST OF CITY CLERK'S DUTIES 1. Maintain custody of records. 2. Index and file City records and prepare certified copies. 3. Serve as Clerk of the Council (attend all Regular, Special and Adjourned meetings and workshops, sign documents and agreements, record votes cast and conditions stipulated, follow-up action of Council to City staff, prepare Chamber for each meeting.) 4. Maintain record of the proceedings of City Council meetings. 5. Attest, publish, post, index and file Ordinances and Resolutions. 6. Maintain custody of City Seal. 7. Administer and file Oaths of Office. 8. Administer oaths, affirmations and acknowledgements. 9. Receive petitions relating to Initiatives, Referendums or Recalls. 10. Attest and accept subpoenas. 11. Perform duties concerning Street and Easement vacations. 12. Perform duties concerning liens, encroachments and release of liens. 13. Receive claims and perform duties concerned therewith. 14. Give notice of Public Hearings, supervise all legal noticing for City, contract with newspaper for publications. 15. Receive and open bids. 16. Record with the County Recorder such documents as are required to be recorded. 17. Assist citizens regarding record requests, City Council meeting procedures, claims and various other matters. 18. Conduct research, assemble data and prepare reports, drafts, memoranda, correspondence as may be directed by the City Council or City Manager. vvhihit "A" 19. Administration of City Clerk's Department. 20. Preparation of City Clerk and Election budgets. 21. Maintain, supplement and duplicate City Code and Zoning Code books. 22. Other statutory duties pursuant to State law except those transferred to the Finance Director. 23. Appoint deputies. 24. Filing officer for disclosure and campaign statements per Fair Political Practices Commission. 25. Responsible for proper posting of agendas for meetings under the Brown Act. 26. Serve as Parliamentarian to City Council. 27. Receive and process Written Communications from the Public. CITY CLERK - DUTIES REQUIRED BY LAW: The statutes of the State prescribe the basic functions and duties of city clerks in general law cities. The Government Code provides that the city clerk shall perform such additional duties as are prescribed by ordinance. Thus, the duties and responsibilities of city clerks are not necessarily the same even in general law cities, and each city clerk is subject to the exact requirements of his own city. The following statutory duties performed by California city clerks are listed by section title and State Code reference. You may want to refer to the City Clerks Handbook prepared by the League of California Cities and the California State Code for more detailed information on each subject: 1. Maintain custody of records. (Gov. C. §§34090.5, 36520, 40801, 40806, 40808) a. Certification of copies. b. Indexing and filing. 2. Serve as Clerk of the Council. (Gov. C. SS 36804, 36814) 3. Record and maintain proceedings of Council meetings. (Gov. C. §§ 36814, 40801) a. Attest adjournment; declare adjournment if quorum not present. (Gov. C. § 54955 et seq.) 4. Attest, publish, index, file ordinances. (Gov. C. §§ 36932, 36933, 40806) a. Attest, index, file resolutions. 5. Maintain custody of City Seal. (Gov. C. S 40811) 6. Administer and file Oaths of Office. (Gov. C.. SS 3102, 36507) 7. Administer oaths, affirmations and acknowledgements. (Gov. C. § 40814) a. Oath of disaster service. (Gov. C. S 36900) 8. Conduct elections. (Gov. C. § 36900; Elec. C. 22800 et seq. and throughout) 9. Receive petitions relating to initiative, referendum or recall. (Elec. C. §§4001 et seq.) 10. Countersign general obligation bonds. (Gov. C. S 43623) 11. Attest to subpoenas. (Gov. C. § 37105) 12. File Affidavit of Completion. (Gov. C. S 34080) 13. File name change instrument for various purposes. (Gov. C. §. 34092) -1- City Clerk - Duties Required by Law (Continued) 14. Duties concerning Improvement District (or Assessment District) proceedings. (Str. & H. C. S 81000 et seq. and Various) 15. File official bonds. (Gov. C. S 36520) 16. Duties concerning street vacations. (Various State Codes) 17. Duties concerning filing of claims. (Various State Codes) 18. Give notice of public hearings. (Various State Codes) 19. Duties concerning Fair Political Practices Act (Gov. C. § 81000 et seq. (especially duties as Filing Officer). 20. Publications; copies for state library and university; preservation. (Gov. C. § 50110) 21. Open lists of local appointive offices. (Gov. C. § 54970) 22. Codes adopted by reference; maintenance in city clerk's office. (Gov. C. S 50022.6) CITY CLERK - DUTIES REQUIRED BY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: Ordinance No. N. S. 154, as amended (Zoning Ordinance): File and process appeals from action of Planning Commission. Resolution..No. N. S. 2146, adopted April 1, 1958 {based upon Gov. C. § 27281): Authorizing City Clerk to accept and consent to deeds for public purposes. Resolution No. N. S. 3227, adopted July 3, 1973 (last annual Salary Resolution): "Non -Statutory Duties - City -Public Information; Law Clerk -Legal Secretary." City Code, Section 2-3. Bonds of city clerk and city treasurer. Pursuant to § 36518 of the state Government Code, the bonds of the city clerk and the city treasurer are hereby fixed at the following amounts: City treasurer - $50,000.00 City clerk - 2,000.00 (Ord. No. N. S. 365) City Code, Section 2-16. Cooperation of other city officers with cit manager. It shall be the duty of all subordinate officers and the city clerk, city treasurer and city attorney to assist the city manager in administering the affairs of the city'efficiently, economically and harmoniously so far as may be consistent with their duties as prescribed by law and ordinances of the city. (Ord. No. N. S. 153 - People's Ordinance creating office of City Manager.) bf . 11/22/78 -2- RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE COMPENSATION TO BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY TREASURER AND PROVIDING A JOB DESCRIPTION FOR SUCH COMPENSATION. WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the compensation for the City Treasurer; and WHEREAS, the matter of staffing and other job related duties have been reviewed by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to Ordinance No. 79-621 of the City Code of the City of Hermosa Beach, adopted July 24, 1979, the compensation of the City Treasurer shall be fixed by a Resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 2. That the City Treasurer shall receive a salary of Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars ($750.00) per month payable semi- monthly at the same time and in the same manner as the salaries paid to each of the officers and employees of the City. That the duties of the City Treasurer shall be administration of the City's Investment Portfolio; administration of bond issues; signing of monthly warrants; signing of all tract maps; and all other related work as required. SECTION 3. That said compensation as set forth in Section 2 of this Resolution shall be in full force and effect beginning I July 1, 1988 and remain in full force until such time as this Resolution is amended or repealed. SECTION 4. That the City Treasurer shall be eligible for the same insurance and retirement benefits as the City Council. SECTION 5. That this Resolution supersedes City Council Resolution No. 87-5044 adopted June 23, 1987. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of June, 1987. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City. of Hermosa Beach, Calif. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: • CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 WHEREAS, a budget for the fiscal year 1988-89 has been prepared by the City Manager, and WHEREAS, said budget incorporates expenditures for operating purposes, capital outlay and capital improvement projects; and WHEREAS, said budget includes the appropriations limit and total annual appropriations subject to limitation as required by Section 37200 of the Government Code. WHEREAS, the City Council has examined said budget and, after due deliberation and consideration, has made such amend- ments to the budget as it deems advisable. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council does hereby approve and adopt the revised budget for the 1988-89 Fiscal Year as pre- sented in the document entitled "City of Hermosa Beach Budget Summary 1988-89" as amended by the City Council through June 14, 1988, and summarized as follows: (Attached as "Exhibit A") PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovn't/State Intergovn't/County Intergovn't/Fed Current Service Chg Other Revenue TOTAL ESTIMATED REV CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 1988-89 GENERAL FUND $5,283,500 253,115 135,000 315,360 798,610 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/88 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN TOTAL ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget Capital Outlay Capital Improvements SUBTOTAL PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS 316,999 40,000 7,142,584 1,618,654 1,732,924 10,494,162 X8,170,745 462,482 233,933 8,867,160 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT 221,492 TOTAL FUNDS APPROPRIATED ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/89 9,088,652 LIGHTING FUND $384,882 80,000 464, 882. 1,262,222 1,727,104 321,490 121,000 442,490 30,500 472,990 0.,405,510* 1,254,114 *DESIGNATED FOR: ASSET REPLACEMENT $120,000 CAP IMPROVEMENTS $443,165 **RETAINED EARNINGS RESERVED PARKING STATE GAS COUNTY GAS PARK REC FUND TAX FUND TAX FUND FAC TAX FUND • 1,375,000 169,000 785,500 2;329,500 14,846 2,344,346 837,787 57,700 895,487 1,434,013 2,329,500 14,846** 44,000 262,441 306,441 191,117 79,450 577,008 471,502 471,502 76,250 547,752 29,256 4,000 15,000 19,000 29,765 $70,000 28,807 175,000 273,807 414,610 • 48,765 688,417 141,600 141,600 141,600 48,765 546,817*** OPEN SPACE $200,000 CONTINGENCY 1395,514 ***PROPSECT AFFORD HSG $ 46,831 LITIGATION $200,000 PARK$50,000 Exhibit A Revised 6/14/88 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 1988-89 • UUT RR RIGHT 6% UUT* REV SHARING PROP A GRANT OF WAY FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes 777,627 Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property (42,000 Intergovn't/State Intergovn't/County Intergovn't/Fed Current Service Chg Other Revenue TOTAL ESTIMATED REV ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/88 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN TOTAL ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget Capital Outlay Capital Improvements 819,627 190,459 1,166,440 36,000- 8,000 1,222,440 8,000 31,986 226,009 12,000 13,360 251,369 140,674 433,200. 433,200 (13,257) 81,600 1,010,086 1,222,440 986 171,477 501,543 220,566 SUBTOTAL PROPOSED 220,566 APPROPRIATIONS INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL FUNDS APPROPRIATED ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/89 1,010,086 1,041,954 180,486 514,800 514,800 39,000. 39,000 220,566 514,800 986 171,477 (13,257) ESTIMATED REVENUE Taxes Licenses/Permits Fines/Forfeitures Use of Money/Property Intergovn't/State Intergovn't/County Intergovn't/Fed Current Service Charge Other Revenue TOTAL ESTIMATED REV ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 7/1/88 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN TOTAL ESTIMATED 70,497 FUNDS AVAILABLE PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 1988-89 • CR GRD SEWER ASSET FORF XRPIPROTECT INSURANCE TOTAL FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND S78,691 78,691 (8,104) Operating Budget Capital Outlay Capital Improvements 58,648 SUBTOTAL PROPOSED 58,648 APPROPRIATIONS 48,000 5,000. 37,200 25,000 . 115,200 904,672 800,000 • 1,819,872 16,000 24,000 '0 000` 16,000 501`0.00► 24,000 240,700 742,292 -5f1";000 193,892 256,700 800,000 960,184 S7,987,149 253,115 1,510,000 847,167 1,061,051 20,000' 433,200 1,153,059 290,000 13,554,741 5,760,546. 2,937,866 22,253,153 126,398 100 ti0O 834,965 10,670,599 11,070 531,252 1,628,000 3,110,835 1,765,468 834,965 14,312,686 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT 4,500 23,850 66,307 TOTAL FUNDS 63,148 1,789,318 66,307 •Y00000' APPROPRIATED ESTIMATED FUND 7,349 30,554 ;190,393 0 W" BALANCE 6/30/89 2,937,866 17,250,552 125,219 5,002,601 • • f • • • • • DEPARTMENT DIVISION FUND ' CREDITS: • • , • • • • • • • • • • • 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REQUEST DETAIL BY DIVISION BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1101 - CITY COUNCIL • 001 GENERAL FUND 4102 CITY COUNCIL 4110 CITY COUNCIL 4111 CITY COUNCIL 4112 CITY COUNCIL 4201 CITY COUNCIL 4304 CITY COUNCIL 4305 CITY COUNCIL 4315CITY COUNCIL '4317 CITY COUNCIL 4319 CITY COUNCIL 4397 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SALARIES/MISC VACATION/SICK PAY OFF ACCRUAL CASH IN PART TIME/TEMPORARY CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE TELEPHONE OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES (MEMBERSHIP, CONFERENCE EXPENSE. SPECIAL EVENTS 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT CLASS TOTALS : 5400 CITY COUNCIL EQUIPMENT 5401 CITY COUNCIL /EQUIPMENT LESS THAN $500 OBJECT CLASS TOTALS : 85 - 86 ACTUAL 86 - 87 87 - 88 ACTUAL BUDGET 87 - 88 87 - 88 BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL (EST) REQUEST RECOMMEND O 19.929 20.772- 12.716 19,074 20.731- 20.731- O 280 374- 0 0 518- 518- O 1.851 374- 202 303 518- 518- O ' 14.319 18.000- 9.716 14.574 18.000- 18.000- O 36.379 39. 520- 22.634 33, 951 39, 767- 39, 767- O 826 18.300- 0 12.500 0 O 826 18,300- 0 12.500 0 0 O 691 655- 396 574 600- 600- O 12.383 8.100- 6. 052 9.078 9.500- 9. 500- O 2.697 5.431- 4.998 5.000 5.300- 04c,959- O 2, 699 5, 606- 2, 850 3,000 5.950- f'5, 000- O 1.761 700- 229 500 1.000- 1.000- O 0 0 0 0 0 1.590 O 20.231 20.492- 14.525 18.152 22.350- 19,069- O 57.436 78.312- 37.159 64.603 62.117- 58.836- O 234 2, 500- 560 560 0 O 0 0 0 0 2. 500- 2, 500- O 234 2.500- 560 560 2.500- 2.500- O 234 2.500- 560 560 2.500- 2.500- • I • • • O O J • • • FUND TOTALS f 37.7 19 'f 'K b� 17 ., ER:s:x, 30 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET '1988-1989 DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL OBJECT AUTHORIZED DEPT. REC. CITY MGR. REC. CITY COUNCIL CODES 87-88 88-89 88-89 APPROVED 4102 REGULAR SALARIES SECRETARY 0.50 CLERK TYPIST 0.25 4112 PART-TIME TEMPORARY CITY COUNCILMEMBERS 5 TOTAL 5.75 0.50 0.25 5 5.75 0.50 0.25 5 5.75 BUDGET EXPLANATIONS OBJECT ACCOUNT CODES TITLE EXPLANATIONS 4112 PART-TIME TEMPORARY: Councilmembers.receive $300 per month 4315 MEMBERSHIP: 4317 CONFERENCE: 4319 SPECIAL EVENTS: 5400 EQUIPMENT CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: League of Cities - State $2,089; League of Cities - L.A. Division $575; So. Cal. Assoc. of Governments $517; West Basin Water Assoc. $100; So. Bay Cities Assoc. $200; Nat'l. League of Cities $741; Independent Cities Assoc. $758; Rails to Trails Conservancy $18. Monthly Councilmember Expense: Assumes $40/mo for yr. $480; League of Calif. Cities Annual (3 persons) $2,000; National League of Cities (1 person) $1,200; League of CA Cities Legislative Forum (1 person) $600; Mayor/Council Executive Forum $650; Loreto Sister City Visit (2 persons) $500 Proclamations, plaques, mementos, flowers, etc. prepared and presented on behalf of the City $1,000. Holiday decorations 50/50 match with Chamber of Commerce $2,500 COUNCIL SHOULD REVIEW VALUE OF NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES MEMBERSHIP AND CONFERENCE FOR OUR SIZE CITY. CITx OONCIIr 'REVIBI0101: - 41117 $1 OOO/YI2 ER COUNCILMEMBER r 4315 : :' DROP-NLC= MBRSHP' $74i-4;'''' 31 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REQUEST DETAIL BY DIVISION BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 85 - 86 86 - 87 87 - 88 87 - 88 87 - 88 BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) REQUEST RECOMMEND DIVISION 4102 "-'"'PLANNING-'COMM':" FUND 001 GENERAL FUND CREDITS: 4201 PLANNING COMM CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 0 3.862 3.770- 2.825 4.240 6.120- 6.120- O 3.862 3.770- 2,825 4,240 6.120- 6.120- • . 4305 .120- 4305 PLANNING COMM OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 0 1.849 2.000- 672 2.000 2,000- 1.200- 4316 PLANNING COMM TRAINING0 , 0 1.100- 13 250 1. 100- _,_x°,�_- 44317 PLANNING COMM CONFERENCE 'EXPENSEi 0 0.. 250- 0 0 250-,350--4 4397 PLANNING COMM 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS 0 0 0 0 0 0 217 O . 1, 849 3. 350- 685 2.250 3, 350- 2, 333 - OBJECT CLASS TOTALS : 0 5,711. 7.120- 3.510 6.490 9.470- 8.453 - FUND TOTALS : O 5, 711 7. 120- 3. 510 6. 490 9. 470- 8, 453 - OBJECT ACCOUNT CODES TITLE 4201 Contract Services/Private 4316 Training 4317 Conference BUDGET EXPLANATIONS EXPLANATIONS Minutes secretary fees $15/hr Estimate @$550/Commissioner for 2 Commis- sioners to attend major seminar such as 1988 Planning Commissioners Institute. 5 Commissioners to attend Chamber of Commerce Retreat at $50 a Commissioner CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: - Reduction in office supplies from $2.000 to $1,'200. - Training expense transferred to conference account #4317. CITY rCOUNCIIREV.TSIOW Commnssioners instead`of" o7-attend:'_majo'r'``sem nar. eIete''S "Comm' ssioners"to attend Chamberk of'Commerce Retreat. 115 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REQUEST DETAIL BY DIVISION BUDGET YEAR'1988 — 1989 VERSION 1 85 — 86 86 — 87 87 — 88 87 — 88 87 — 88 BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) REQUEST RECOMMEND DEPARTMENT 0000 DIVISION 0000 FUND 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES FUND 3910 PARK/RECREATION IN LIEU 0 19.602— 185.000 142.748— 185,000— 175.000 175,000 O 19.602— 185,000 142.748— 185,000— 175.000 175.000 OBJECT CLASS TOTALS : 0 251.803— 285.000 177.888— 294.774— 273.807 273.807 FUND TOTALS : 0 251.803— 285, 000 177. 888— 294. 774— 273. 807 273. 807 FUND 126 T'_ UUT: RAILROAD -RIGHT OF WAY FUND CREDITS: '3120 4% UTILITY USER TAX 0 0 0 0 190.459— 777.627 777,627 O 0 0 0 190.459— 777.627 777.627 3401: a INTERE8TINCOME4an 0 0 0 0 0 42.000 "'f`42 O00" O 0 0 0 0 42.000 42.000 OBJECT CLASS TOTALS : 0 0 0 0 190,459— 819,627 819.627 FUND FUND TOTALS : 0 0 0 0 190.459— 819.627 819,627 127 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND • CREDITS: 3120 UTILITY USER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 1166.440 40 • 16 • • f • • • DEPARTMENT 0000 DIVISION 0000 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REQUEST DETAIL BY DIVISION BUDGET YEAR 1988 — 1989 VERSION 1 85 — 86 86 — 87 87 — 88 87 — 88 87 — 88 BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) REQUEST RECOMMEND FUND 127--6X'UTILITY USER TAX FUND • • • • • • • • • • • • • O 0 0 0 0 O 1166, 440 3401 INTEREST "INCOME n % 0 0 0 0 0 56.000 ` 56.000'4 O 0 0 0 0 56.000 56,000 OBJECT CLASS TOTALS : 0 0 0 0 0 56.000 1222.440 FUND CREDITS: 3401 FUND TOTALS : 130 REVENUE SHARING FUND INTEREST INCOME O 0 0 0 0 56.000 1222,440 O 7.435— 1.916 3.287— 7.200— 8.000 8.000 O 7, 435— 1, 916 3, 287— 7.200- 8, 000 8. 000 3702 REVENUE SHARING—_�—_-0 13,042— 0 0 0 0 O 13.042— 0 0 0 0 0 OBJECT CLASS TOTALS : 0 20.477— 1,916 3.287— 7.200— 8.000 8.000 FUND CREDITS: 3414 FUND TOTALS : O 20.477— 1.916 3,287— 7.200— 8.000 8.000 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND FUND EXCHANGE 0 O 177,190 177,190— 177. 190— 0 17 e • r vata,tt� rL; CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REQUEST DETAIL BY DIVISION BUDGET YEAR 1988 — 1989 VERSION i 85 — 86 86 — 87 87 — 88 87 — 88 97 — 88 BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL. ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) REQUEST RECOMMEND DEPARTMENT. 0000 DIVISION 0000 FUND 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND FUND 180 'FZRE'PROTECTjON!UM ... CREDITS: o; FIRE FLOW FEES 0 0 0 0 0 50.000 4'054)700014'14- 0 5470004'' r 0 0• 0 0 0 50. 000 50. 000 OBJECT CLASS TOTALS : O O O O 0 50.000 50.000 FUND TOTALS : 0 0 0 0 0 50.000 50.000 FUND 205 DEBT SERVICE FUND CREDITS: 3401 INTEREST INCOME 0 5.972— 0 0 0 0 O 5.972— 0 0 0 0 0 OBJECT CLASS TOTALS : 0 5.972— 0 0 0 0 0 FUND CREDITS: 3401 --- -- --------- FUND FUND TOTALS _ 0 5.972— O 0 0 0 0 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND INTEREST INCOME O 8. 970- 0 22 C !TY' OF HERMOSA -BEACH' — REQUEST DETAIL BY DIVISION BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 • 85 - 86 86 - 87 87 - 88 87 - 88 87 - 88 BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) REQUEST RECOMMEND DIVISION 22024iTi;IHYDRANT UPGRADO FUND 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND CREDITS: i '420 HYDRANT?. 'UPGRADE 'CONTRACT -,.SERVICE/PR IVATE - 0 0 0 0 0 100. 000- 1,737;070064t: 0 0 0 0 0 100,000- 100.000 - .• • - • - • - • • - OBJECT CLASS TOTALS : 0 • 0 0 0 0 100.000- 100,000: FUND TOTALS : •Ilaimmwon.,••••••.• •,•kmoa••••••••mmo.w. 0 • 0 0 0 100.000-0 100. 000 - New Page • • • • • DIVISION 1206 FUND 001 CREDITS: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REQUEST DETAIL BY DIVISIQN BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 DATA PROCESSING% GENERAL FUND • 4102 DATA PROCESSING REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 DATA PROCESSING REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 DATA PROCESSING VACATION/SICK PAY OFF • 4111 DATA PROCESSING ACCRUAL CASH IN • • • • • • • • • • 85 - 86 ACTUAL 86 - 87 87 - 88 ACTUAL BUDGET 87 - 88 87 - 88 ACTUAL (EST) O 46.850 44,152- 30.739 46.000 O ,626 2.000- 118 200 O 319 795- 0 0 O 413 795- 48.208 95- 4201 -DATA PROCESSING CONTRACT'SERVICE/PRIVATE.:,cr 4304 DATA PROCESSING 4305 DATA PROCESSING 4309 DATA PROCESSING 4315 DATA PROCESSING 4316 DATA PROCESSING 4317 DATA PROCESSING 4397 DATA PROCESSING TELEPHONE OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE MATERIALS MEMBERSHIP TRAINING CONFERENCE EXPENSE 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT CLASS TOTALS : 48.208 47,742- 30.857 46.200 O 51.423. 127i969- 54.408 100.000 O 51.423 127.969- 54.408 100,000 O 3.586 6.928- 1.523 3.000 O 8.24? 8.600- 4,453 8. 600 O 2.121 3.000- 1.386 2.000 O 250 370- 150 370 O 2.646 1.450- 1.883 4.000 O 612 500- 885 1.000 O 0 0 0 0 O 17.457 20,848- 10.280 18.970 O 117,08S 196,559- 95.545 165,170 5400 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT 0 5402 DATA PROCESSING/EQUIPMENT MORE THAN 4500 0 OBJECT CLASS TOTALS : 6700 DATA PROCESSING INTEREST BUDGET MANAGER REQUEST RECOMMEND 68.794- 68,794- 500- 500- 1.720- 1.720- 1.720- 1.720- 72.734- 72,734- 118.936- 2,734- 118.936- "`93 000-* 118.936- 93,000- 3,000- 3.000- 10.000- 3.000- 670- 2,000- 850- 3.000- 10.000- 3.000- 670- 2,000- 850- 19,520- 19,520- 211.190- 211.190- 81.676 81.676 43.305- 31.634 43.305 0 O 0 O O 199.190- 81.676 99.190- 81.676 43. 305- 31.634 43,305 199,190- 81.676 99,190- 81,676 43,305- 31.634 43,305 199.190-.• 1.646 0 0 0 O 1.646 0 0 0 0 0 • • • • • • 3.000- 10.000- 3.000- .000- 10.000- 3.000- • 670- 2,000- 850- 5.226 70- 2,000- 850-5,226 14.294- 180,028.- • 4.294- 180,028- • 7. 830- 7.830- 7.830- 0 • • • • 53 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH . BUDGET . FY 88/89 DEPT. General Services - DATA PROCESSING - BUDGET EXPLANATIONS OBJECT ACCOUNT CODES TITLE EXPLANATION 4201 Contract Serv./Private $93,000 Hardware Maintenance ($42,450) includes: Uniforce Fuel System Hardware ($1200), Xerox Diablo Printer ($5550), H.P. Computer, Disk Drive, Ter minals and Printers ($30,000), Gandalf Modems ($2300), Printronix Printers ($3400) PLUS Software Support ($49,150) includes; H.P. System and Software Support ($12,000), Unicite Parking Citation Systems ($2,700), Uniforce Fuel System ($2400), E -Mail ($900), Apple II ($150). All In focomp Systems Support, upgrades and installation of Payroll Vehicle Maintenance & indexing ($31,000) PLUS: Data Bank offsite back-up storage ($1400) 4309 Maintenance Materials Cables, Connectors, tools, etc. 4315 Membership Beta Group; Hewlett-Packard Cities SIG (Special Interest Group for Municipal Governments and related agencies; Association of Municipal Data Processing Directors; SCRUG/Interex, (Southern Calif. Regional Users Group/the International As sociation of H.P. Computer users. 4317 Conference Beta Group; Interex. 5400 Equipment Linking Terminal to L.A. County JDIC System to retrieve Vehicle Registration Information. Cobol II/V Compiler. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: Deleted upgrade of C.P.U., new disc drive (until cost effectiveness shown), two (2) word terminals (can transfer existing), and $10,000 for Disaster Recovery.software (not cost effective). Suggest looking at cost effectiveness of maintenance contracts on terminals. 55 SCHEDULE OF BUDGET TRANSFERS, REVISED 6/14/88 STATE GAS TAX FUND From General Fund, CIP 160 From Sewer Fund, CIP 302 From Revenue Sharing Fund, CIP 160 To Grant Fund, CIP 102 To Grant Fund, CIP 138 To General Fund, Traffic Safety Department FUND TOTALS 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND:`: To General Fund, Foot Patrol, Code Enforcement To Sewer Fund To`Fire _Protection-Fund`Fire{'Hydrant Upgrade FUND TOTALS REVENUE SHARING FUND To State Gas Tax Fund, CIP 160 FUND TOTALS GRANT FUND From State Gas Tax Fund, CIP 138 From Sewer Fund, CIP 102 • From State Gas Tax Fund, CIP 102 From Lighting Fund, CIP 102 FUND TOTALS TRANSFER IN . TRANSFER OUT 27,600 . 12,850 39,000 79,450 0 0 26,800 11,000 17,800 26,000 81,600 17,800 26,800 31 650 76,250 191,954 800,000 50,0003 1,041,954 39,000 39,000 0 8 CROSSING GUARD FUND To General Fund, Administration FUND TOTALS SEWER FUND From 67 UUT Fund To Grant Fund, CIP 102 To State Gas Tax Fund, CIP 302 TRANSFER. .IN 800,000 FUND TOTALS 800,000 TRANSFER OUT 4,500 4,500 11,000 12 ,850 23,850 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND To General Fund, Police Equipment 66.307 FUND TOTALS 0 66,307 FIRE PROTECTION FUND From 67 UUT Fund Fire Hydrant Upgrade] FUND TOTALS INSURANCE FUND From General Fund 193.892 50,000 50,000 FUND TOTALS GRAND TOTALS 193,892 0 2,937,866 2,937,866 9 GENERAL FUND - DEPARTMENT CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK/RECORDS ELECTIONS LEGAL - ATTORNEY LEGAL - PROSECUTOR CITY TREASURER CITY MANAGER FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION PERSONNEL CABLE TV DATA PROCESSING BUSINESS LICENSE GENERAL APPROPRIATION EMPLOYEE HEALTH BENEFITS RETIREMENT PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES POLICE FIRE ANIMAL CONTROL CIVIL DEFENSE MEDIANS STREET MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SAFETY PLANNING PLANNING COMMISSION BUILDING PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SERVICE COMMUNITY RESOURCES PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TOTAL RECAP OF APPROPRIATIONS 1988-89 BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS SPECIAL FUND - DEPARTMENT 61336"' 53,619 13,747 138,524 38,454 27,908 118,034 248,275 89,235 30,449 f-187;858' 96,525 80,930 426,458 917,831 390,000 2,462,691 1,111,029 110,139 45,601 115,453 263,169 150,751 152,145 8,453 281,511 150,302 259,346 114,166 259,722 229,566 233,933 8,867,160 STREET LIGHTING FUND STREET LIGHTING DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PARKING FUND VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT PARKING ENFORCEMENT STATE GAS TAX FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PARKS RECREATION FACILITY FUND •CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PROPOSITION A FUND DIAL -A -RIDE COMMUTER BUS BUS PASS SUBSIDY GRANT FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT SEWER FUND SEWER/STORM DRAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS INSURANCE FUND LIABILITY INSURANCE AUTO/PROP/BONDS UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE WORKER'S COMPENSATION MEDICARE FIRE PROTECTION FUND 3�HYDRANVUPGRADE FU, OTHER FUND TOTAL GRAND TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 321,490 121,000 65,344 830,143 471,502 141,600 160,192 45,735 14,639 514,800 58,648 137,468 1,628,000 527,374 39,025 50,000 194,566 24,000 5,445,526 14,312,686 • • • I s i 1 • 880710 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 1 16:07:49 APPROPRIATION SUMMARY COMPARISON BY FUND DATE 06/09/88 BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 FUND 001 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1101 CITY COUNCIL 1121 CITY CLERK 1122 ELECTIONS 1131 CITY ATTORNEY 1132 CITY PROSECUTOR 1141 CITY TREASURER 85 - 86 7. CHO 86 - 87 7. CHO 87 - 88 87 - 88 87 - 88 % EST/ BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL ACTUAL (EST) BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) CRBDOT REQUEST RECOMMENDS O "-57.670 13 80.812- 37.719 65.163 19- 64.617- 61.336- O 40.476 40 56.505- 37.264 56.566 61.468- . 53,619- O 5.420 350 24.400- 962 24. 400 14. 100- 13, 747- 0 307.830 5- 335.146- 195,962 293.943 12- 344.050- 138.524- O 27.165 18 29.790- 21.310 31.965 7 39.440- 38,454- M -M-- - • -� 0 37,958 4 36.470- 24,551 39.305 8 . 30.724- 27.908- O 476.519 563.123- 317.768 511.342 554.399- 333.588 - DEPARTMENT 1200 MOMT/SUPPORT 1201 CITY MANAGER 0 113.369 1 120.496- 77.227 114.059 5- 118.925- 118.034- • 1202 FINANCE ADMIN 0 200,710 3 216.587- 147.945 206.331 5- 256.418- 248,275- 1203 PERSONNEL 0 102.421 8 110.854- 56.685 110.742 108,974- 89.235- 1205 CABLE TV 0 5.240 169 13.313- 7.483 14.114 6 37.720- 30.449- • 1206 DATA PROCESSING 0 223.022 7- 239.864- 127.179 208.475 13- 410.380- 187.858- 1207 BUS LICENSE 0 65.696 25 82.776- 53.094 81.988 1- 94.036- 96.525- , - 1208 GEN APPROP - 0 15.426 521 71.997- 41,291 95.812 33 64.279- 80.930- . 1212 EMP BENEFITS 0 359.581 6 363.702- 251.267 382.000 5 437.393- 426.458- • 1213 RETIREMENT 0 1.050.631 14- 984.045- 518.019 900.000 9- 941.365- 917.831- 1214 PROSP EXP 0 0 77.248- 0 20.000 74- 400.000- 390.000- , 1216 ADVERTISING 0 8.850 0 72- 0 0 0 s • • DEPARTMENT 2100 POLICE 2101 POLICE O 2, 144. 946 2.280.882- 1. 280, 118 2. 133. 521 2. 869. 490- 2. 585, 595- O 2.157.686 3 2.352.483- 1.434. 857 2.212. 518 6- 2.646,656- 2.462,691- 0 .462,691- 0 2. 157. 686 2.352.483- 1.434.857 2.212.518 2.646.656- 2.462.691 - DEPARTMENT 2200 FIRE 2201 FIRE 0 1.055. 628 8 1.137.805- 739.700 1.142. 647 1,205.540- 1.111.029 - * 1. 055. 628 1. 137. 805- 739. 700 1. 142, 647 1.205, 540- 1. 111. 029 - DEPARTMENT 2400 ANIMAL REOULTN I• • 2401 ANIMAL CONTROL 0 63.093 44 91.453- 54.783 90.840 1- 113,463- 110.139- wrr.s...:..161.4.1.1116.14:1•OWNAlla...eke.'A:.... ro • 40 • • fib 880710 16:07: 49 .110 O 63.093 91.453- 54.783 . 90.840 113,463- 110.139- C/TY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROPRIATION SUMMARY.COMPARISON BY FUND BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 1 PAGE 2 • DATE 06/09/88 1 85 - 86 X CHG 86 - 87 % CHG 87 - 88 87 - 88 87 - 88 % EST/ BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL -ACTUAL (EST) BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) CRBDGT REQUEST RECOMMENDS 1 DEPARTMENT 2700 DISASTER -PREP -- - 2701 CIVIL DEFENSE --MN-- 01.002 4704 57,567- 18.853 48.139 16- 51,045- 45.601- -MM • 0 1. 002 57, 567- 18,853 48.139 51.045- 45.601- • DEPARTMENT 3100 ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 3101 MEDIANS 0 0 . •0 0 0 118.413- 115.453- • 3103 ST MAINTENANCE 0 226.198 11 263.554- 163.159 251.400 5- 268.414- 263.169- 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY00 2.603- 0 0 154,155- 150,751- «��- - • 0 226.198 266. 157- 163. 159 251,400 540,982- 529.373- • DEPARTMENT 4100 PLANNING 4101 PLANNING 0 100.163 42 160,970- 9.1.623 142,152 12- 170,700- 152.145- * 4102 PLANNING COMM 0 5.711 14 7,120- 3,510 6.490 9- 9.470- 8,453- 40 DEPARTMENT ,453- DEPARTMENT 4200 CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4201 BUILDING 4202 PUB WKS ADMIN • 4203 BOARD OF APPEAL 4204 BLDG MAINT 4205 EQUIP SERVICE - DEPARTMENT 4600 COMM PROMOTION 4601 COMM RESOURCES 4602 COMM RES COMM 40 41 O 105.874 168,090- 95.133 148.642 180,170- 160,598- O 231.827 11 267.518- 161.967 258,109 4- 288.864- 281.511- O 209. 147 39- 138,673- 78.024 127,452 8- 164. 116- 150,302- O 300 400- 120 300 25- 400- 0 O 297.512 19- 255,533- 155.172 240,450 6- 273.996- 259.346- O 77,466 17 96,639- 59.221 90.283 7- 117.593- 114.166- • 0 816.252 758.763- 454.504 716.594 844.969- 805.325- O 212.236 53 321.780- 180.723 325.051 1 308.382- 259.722- O 73 105 150- 76 150 150- 0 ' 0 212.309 321.930- 180,799 325.201 308.532- 259, 722- i - INA 410 • SB0710 16:07:49 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROPRIATION SUMMARY.COMPARISON BY FUND BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 PAGE 3 DATE 06/09/88 85 - 86 % CHO 86 - 87 X CHO 87 - 88 87 - 88 87 - 88 X EST/ BUDGET MANAGER • - ACTUAL ACTUAL' (EST) --'BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) CRBDGT REQUEST RECOMMENDS DEPARTMENT 5100 PHYSICAL/MENTAL 5101 CHILD ABUSE 0 15,000 0 2.500- 0 0 0 • O —.15.000 - 0 2. 500- 0 0 0 • DEPARTMENT 6100 PARKS/REC • 6101 PARKS 0 177.994 12 216.833- 118,919 199.016 8- 223.452- 229,566-• ,. j 0 177.994 216.833- 118.919 199.016 223.452- 229.566- DEPARTMENT 8100 STREET/SAFETY • 8176 CIP 86-176 O O 0 0 0 39.195- 39.195- • O 0 0 0 0 39.195- 39.195 - • DEPARTMENT 8600 BLDGS & GROUNDS 8601 CIP 86-601 • 8602 CIP 86-602 8604 CIP 86-604 8606 CIP 87-606 • 8610 CIP 88-610 8611 CIP 88-611 8612 CIP 88-612 • • FUND 001 TOTALS: • 0 O 34.117 56- 15.730- 2.135 • 14.935 5- 118.505- 2.925- O 2.610 877 74.250- 306 25.500 66- 24,375- 24,375- o 24.089 118 105.550- 20.371 52.550 50- 80,341- 39.201- O 0 180.591- 12.616 153,961 15- 46.630- 46.630- O 0 8.200 0 8, 200 71,857- 71.857.--. O 0 O 0 0 132.000- 0 O 0 0 0 O 9.750- 9.750- O 60.816 ®men=m==am=a O 7. 513, 317 367.921- 35.428 255.146 mammmmmmmm m==ea=eamaa m=emamme==a 8.583.007- 4.891. 521 8.035.006 483.458- 194.738- 000=_=mmmmat ma=m=m=a== 10, 061, 351- 8. 867. 160- 411. • 0 • 880710 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 4 16:07:49 APPROPRIATION SUMMARY'COMPARISON 9Y FUND DATE 06/09/88 BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 85 - 86 7. CHO 86 - 87 7L CHO 87 - 88 87 - 88 87 - 88 7. EST/ BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL ACTUAL (EST) BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) CRBDGT REQUEST RECOMMENDS FUND 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND DEPARTMENT 2600 STREET LIGHTING 2601 STREET LIGHTING 0 " X - 343. 157 14- 336.906- 196.434 295.832 12- 321, 490- 321.490- DEPARTMENT 8200 STREET LIGHTING • 8201 CIP 85-201 8202 CIP 85-202 8203 CIP 85-203 FUND 105 TOTALS: O 343. 157 336.906- 196,434 295,832 321.490- 321.490- _ 19.635 53 35.938- 8.674 30.000 17- 44,000- 44.000- O 26.290 101 115.500- 15.790 52.971 54- 49.500- 49.500- O 1.550 1629 32.262- 6.323 26.796 17- 27.500- 27.500- O 47.475 •183.700- 30.787 109.767 121.000- 121.000- osmaaeaeem® vesafleeasa O 390.632 520.606- 227.221 405.599 442.490- .= ===== === 42.490- -aeQsamaam 442,490- a• v. • • • 40 • • • • • 880710 16:07:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 5 APPROPRIATION BUMMARY'COMPARISON BY FUND DATE 06/09/88 BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 85 - 86 % CHO 86 - 87 X CHG 87 - 88 87 - 88 87 - 88 7. EST/ BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL ACTUAL (EST) BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) CRBDGT REQUEST RECOMMENDS FUND 110 PARKING FUND DEPARTMENT 3300 PKO FACILITIES • • 3301 VEH PKG DIST 0 316. 595 82- 58. 100- 33.760 55. 584 4- 65,874- 65.344- 3302 PARKING ENF 0 699, 497 19 881,208- 478. 365 829. 156 6- 964,626- 830, 143- 3303 COIN CTR PKO STR 0 8. 500 0 00 0 0 , . • O - 1.024. 592 939.308- 512.125 884.740 1.030,500- 895.487- • DEPARTMENT 8600 BLINDS & GROUNDS • • • • • • • • 8605 CIP 86-605 FUND 110 TOTALS: O 6.242 -N«M .0 0 0 0 0 O _- N6.242 0 0 0 0 0 aaavasaaaaa ' aaaasasaaa aaaaaaanaaa ==== ======= O 1,030, 834 939.308- 512, 125 884,740 fl====aaamm n========= 1,030,500- 895, 487- � . ! . , . . : i '.F4K i 44110 t ,, N1i.,+�t� O 404144Mi.'flb�Ra • • It • • •� 880710 1 16:07:49 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROPRIATION SUMMARY COMPARISON•BY FUND BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 85 - 86 % CHO 86 - 87 X CHO 87 - 88 ACTUAL - ACTUAL (EST) BUDGET FUND 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND • DEPARTMENT 3100 ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 3101 MEDIANS • 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY • • • • • 9 DEPARTMENT 8100 8160 CIP 85-160 "8163 CIP 85-163 8165 CIP 87-165 8170 CIP 87-170 8171 CIP 87-171 8174 CIP 88-174 8176 CIP 86-176 -STREET/SAFETY DEPARTMENT 8300 STORM DRAIN 8302 CIP 87-302 DEPARTMENT 8900 OTHER 8904 CIP 86-904 FUND 115 TOTALS: O 116,063 3- O 96.786 29 O 212.849 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,721 108,079 0 0 0 0 0 125,761- 137.820- 263.581- .324 25,761- 137.820- 263.581- 324 60.000- 9.766- 0 0.000- 9.766- 0 82.500- 0 46.200- 120.800 198.466- 8.800 98.466- 8.800 3989 8,800 0 4.628 0 ===ssssas==a - 4.628 sasse=====s 347.077 397.588- 397.588- 0 97.588_397.588- 0 0 PAGE 6 DATE 06/09/88 87 - 88 87 - 88 X EST/ BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL (EST) CRBDOT REQUEST RECOMMENDS 74. 771 79.307 112.158 11- 124.606 10- 154.078 236.764 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 54.000 10- 72,600- 72,600- o 0 0 0 o 8.789 10- 977- 977- 0 0 137.500- 137.500- 0 73.425 11- 91.575- 91,575- 0 0 132.000- 132.000- 5.582 6,000 87- 0 0 5.582 142.214 434.652- 434.652- 5.580 359.862 5.580 359.862 O 0 O 0 ss====sass =s=ass====e ======sass= 859.635- 165.240 738.840 9- 36.850- 36.850- 36,850- 36.850- 0 6.850- 0 ==sa===l=e= =s==ees=== 471.502- 71.502- 471.502- 471.502- • • • . • • e • • • • • • • • 4. • • •I • • . • 880710 16:07:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 7 APPROPRIATION SUMMARY.COMPARISON BY FUND DATE 06/09/88 BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 85 - 86 X CHO 86 - 87 X CHO 87 - 88 87 - 88 87 - 88 % EST/ BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL ACTUAL (EST) BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) CRBDGT REQUEST RECOMMENDS FUND 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES FUND DEPARTMENT 8500 PARKS 8501 CIP 85-501 8502 CIP 85-502 8503 CIP 85-503 8506 CIP 86-506 8507 CIP 87-507 8508 CIP 87-508 • FUND 125 TOTALS: O "-- '--'--39.316 - 0 0 O 13.665 229 153.000- 40.067 O 31. 772 0 0 O 11.964 16- 10.000- 4.890 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 • -•1 O 0 0 45.000 71- 5.500- 5.500- O 0 0 I 10.000 10.000- 10.000- O 5, 100- 5. 100- O 121.000- 121.000- O 96.717 163.000- 44.957 55.000 141.600- 141, 600- MMmMmm==Mama Maas O 96,717 • Marin==as mmmmmmmmmas mm=s======m 163,000- 44,957 55.000 ma======st 141.600- 141.600- 41 • V ✓ w 4140 1 • i UI I ii 1 9. 0 SB0710 16:07:49 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 8 APPROPRIATION SUMMARY COMPARISON BY FUND DATE 06/09/88 BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 85 - 86 X CHG 86 - 87 X CHG 87 - 88 87 - 88 87 - 88 X EST/ BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL ACTUAL (EST) BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) CRBDGT REQUEST RECOMMENDS FUND 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND • DEPARTMENT 0000 0000 - 0 253.861. 0 0 0 0 0 11` ---_� 1 0 253.861 0 0 0 0 0 • DEPARTMENT 8300 STORM DRAIN • 8301 CIP 85-301 0 909- 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 909- • 0 0 0 0 0 • DEPARTMENT 8400 SANITARY SEWER 8404 CIP 85-404 0 30.997- 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 30. 997- 0 0 0 0 0 • I 0 • FUND 140 TOTALS: ====== ====== =sm=m==m==a =====massa oamassaaa=m ====a=oma= =========== =====massa • 0 221.953 0 0 0 0 0 0 11, • • • • 1 • • 0 - 1 • oflo • • 880710 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 9 • 16:07:49 APPROPRIATION SUMMARY'COMPARISON BY FUND DATE 06/09/88 BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 85 - 86 % CHG 86 - 87 X CHO 87 - 88 87 - 88 87 - 88 7. EST/ BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL ACTUAL (EST) BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) CRBDOT REQUEST RECOMMENDS V FUND 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND DEPARTMENT 3400 PUBLIC TRANSIT y 3401 DIAL A RIDE 0 88.847 55 148.449- 55.523 137.448 7- 154.897- 160,192- 3402 COMMUTER BUS 0 107.218 19- 164.269- 44.118 86,778 47- 45.735- 45,735- • 3403 BUS PASS SUBSDY 0 14.759 48- 14.121- 4.599 7.618 46- 14.639- 14.639- 1 ' `/ 3406 CIRC ELEMENT 0 2.582 2611 70.000- 16,760 70.000 0 0 _ 3407 COMTR BUS STUDY 0 0 82.500- 24,386 74,140 10- 0 0 O - - 213.406 479,339- 145,386 375,984 215.271- 220.566- .. ` '1 ' v OP r 41. 41, • s 0 FUND 145 TOTALS: =ari==a=!=== asaa aaaaaaa=MR =========== aarxrarroaa a========== -==carman O - 213. 406 479.339- 145.386 375.984 215.271- 220.566- ; • • e • • 8BG710 16: 07: 49 CITY .OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROPRIATION SUMMARY COMPARISON BY FUND BUDGET YEAR 1988 1989 VERSION i PAGE 10 1 DATE 06/09/88 I 85 — 86 % CHG 86 — 87 % CHG 87 — 88 87 — 88 87 — 88 % EST/ BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL ACTUAL (EST) BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) CRBDGT REQUEST RECOMMENDS FUND 150 GRANT FUND DEPARTMENT 8100 STREET/SAFETY 8102 CIP 85-102 8137 CIP 85-137 8138 CIP 85-138 8173 CIP 88-173 DEPARTMENT 8500 PARKS 8507 CIP 87-507 8508 CIP 87-508 FUND 150 TOTALS: O 0 104,819— 3.691 9.000 91— 118.800— 118.800- O 0 72.600— 3.759 3.759 95— 72.600— 72,600- O 19.901 52— 186.505— 6,966 9.544 95— 191,400— 191,400- O 0 0 0 0 132.000— 132.000- 0 19.901 363.924— 14.416 22.303 514,800— 514.800— O 0 25,300— 72 50.670 100 0 0 O 0 60.000— 0 12,000 80— 0 0 O 0 85.300— ---~~72 62.670 0 0 mmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmm O 19. 901 mmm mem mmmmmm mom= =me mmmmmmmm 449,224 14,488 84.973 514.800— 514.800- • • • • 0 ,• d 0 • l,• lo • • • • SBG710 16:07: 49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROPRIATION SUMMARY'COMPARISON BY FUND BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 PAGE 111 • DATE 06/09/88 . 85 - 86 7. CHG 86 - 87 Y. CHG 87 - 88 87 - 88 87 - 88 A EST/ BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL ACTUAL (EST) BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) CRBDGT REQUEST RECOMMENDS FUND 155 CROSSING GUARD FUND DEPARTMENT 2100 POLICE 2102 CROSSING GUARD 0 63.944 18- 87.958- 30,995 52.652 40- 58,648- 58,648 - FUND 155 TOTALS: r 0 63.944 87.958- 30,995 52.652 58.648- 58, 648- meseeeeeeeee 0 smmeeesemum seeommeme 63.944 87.958- 30.995 52,652 58, 648- essmesmsae 58.648- • • v • 11. • -. 880710 16:07:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 12 APPROPRIATION SUMMARY COMPARISON•DY FUND DATE 06/09/88 BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 85 - 86 % CHG 86 - 87 X CHG 87 - 88 87 - 88 87 - 88 % EST/ BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL ACTUAL (EST) BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) CRBDGT REQUEST RECOMMENDS FUND 160 SEWER FUND DEPARTMENT 3100 ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 3102 SEWER/ST DRAIN 0 0 1041242 4 130.750- 77.597 108,221 17- 137.468- 137.468-- 1041242 37.468- 104,242 130,750 77.597 108.221 137,468- 137.468 - DEPARTMENT 8400 SANITARY SEWER 8401 CIP 85-401 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 8402 CIP 85-402 0 1,178 575.126 546,957 575.126 0 0 8404 CIP 85-404 0 33,369 93- • 17.660- 2.190 2.190 88- 5, 000- 5.000- a 8405 CIP 86-405 0 0 605.825- 14.464 54.912 91- 18089.000- 1.089.000- 8406 CIP 88-406 0 2.137 0 0 0 484.000- 484.000- 8407 CIP 88-407-M---�_0 0 0 0 0 50.000- 50.000- 0 • FUND 160 TOTALS: 0 • 368742 1. 198. 61/- 563.611 632,228 1.628.000- 1.628, 000- a--am----a------------a--a-m-ms- ====== ===== 140.984 1.329.361- 641.208 740.449 ==== --aasa--as 1. 765. 468- 1. 765. 468- I. 0 i Ci 4110 o • • • . * SB0710 • 16:07:49 41. • • • • • • • 41. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROPRIATION SUMMARY COMPARISON 9Y FUND BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 • PAGE 13 i • DATE 06/09/88 i 85 - 86 X CHG 86 - 87 X CHG 87 - 88 87 - 88 87 - 88 Y. EST/ BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL ACTUAL (EST) BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) CRBDGT REQUEST RECOMMENDS FUND 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND DEPARTMENT 2200 FIRE 2202 HYDRANT UPGRADE FUND 180 TOTALS: O 0 -N-� 0 0 -N---N 0 100.000- 100.000- • 0 0 0 0 100.000- 100,000- ____mama=a=m =ma=m==a=s ====mam==a ====m====== m=======a== O 0 0 0 0 ======a==== ========== 100,000- 100,.000- • e • v so • , . 880710 16:07:49 • • • I FUND 705 INSURANCE FUND DEPARTMENT 1200 MGMT/SUPPORT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROPRIATION 8UMMARY'COMPARISON BY FUND BUDGET YEAR 1988 - 1989 VERSION 1 PAGE 14 DATE 06/09/88 85 - 86 % CHG 86 - 87 % CHG 87 - 88 87 - 88 87 - 88 7. EST/ BUDGET MANAGER ACTUAL - ACTUAL (EST) BUDGET ACTUAL (EST) CRBDGT REQUEST RECOMMENDS 1209 LIABILITY INS 0 26,350 946 440.765 234.778 275.586 37- 589,424-. 527.374- /210 AUTO/PROP/BONDS 0 0 56.850- 35,163 38.000 33- 49.025- 39,025- 1211 CITY INSURANCE 0 213,773 0 0 0 0 0 1215 UNEMPLOYMENT 0 - 56.986 12- 75.000- 36.442 50.000 33- 50.000- 50.000- 1217 WORKERS COMP 0 173.169 21 182.000- 85.774 210.187 15 206.911- 194.566- 1218 MEDICARE 0 6,602 114 14.000- 8.395 14.150 1 24.000- 24.000- - -....,.. :.a...- FUND 4.000- FUND 705 TOTALS: GRND TOTALS : • • O 476,880 768,615 400,552 587.923 919.360- 834,965-- - aaassasaaaaa 0 aaaaasaaaaa 476.880 sasaaaasat aaaaaa== == aaaaaa=mama 768.615- 400.552 587,923 919.360- 834,965- aaa1111aa ========== r=======t= ====== ==== =n====aaaa O 10.515, 647 14.180.053- 7.073. 693 11s-961.166 15.720. 990- 14,312.686- •'... tN.r :•.'•L. .:.s'.. -J.. w1:sa'-.I3.6...-.4.0A...nGc.«6;' M • •t , `+ :. :a.+H ....as. - . • w. v V 40 • • e ' +w.y'w}:Y4a.P1d-.f/s4Ypsdar,i.e}a/ APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNCTION - ALL FUNDS 1988-89 BUDGET TRAN8PORTN 126% 1782 MGMT18UPPORT 14.8% 2078 EMPOYEE BENEFI 9.5% 1344 COMM DEV 8.0% / 1225 /LEGISLATIVE 2.4% 335 CdILTRlLEISR 1.8% 229 PUBLIC SAFETY 28.8% 4109 APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNCTION GENERAL FUND 1988-89 BUDGET EMPLOYEE BENE 15.1% 1344 COMM DEV 13.8% 1225 TRANSPORTN 41.0% 529 LEGISLATIVE 3.8% 335 CLP 2.8% 233 CULTIVLEISR 2.5% Ufa PUBLIC SAFETY 42.0% 3729 MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Her4osa Beach, California, held on May 19, 1988 at the hour of 7:06 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson Absent: None Also Present: City Manager Northcraft, Personnel Director Blackwood Council resolved to a committee of the whole in order to discuss possible City goals. A brainstorming session on City goals was then held, in which over 60 possible goals were identified and discussed. Council agreed to have staff type up the goal topics remaining after discussions of each and agreed to have a further session to prepare statements for each goal and then to prioritize the goals. Suggested date for the followup was mid to late June, 1988. ADJOURNMENT The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned at 9:30 p.m. City Manager / • i 4 • ' • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 .VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE-INVC ' PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0001 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP H BUILDERS EMPORIUM 01824 001-400-1206-4305 00300 $101.13 • COMPUTER SHELVING 06/07/88 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES - *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************** ***********+t***********w*►*********** $101.13 • • • • ,• H CALIF NARCOTICS OFCRS ASSOC. REO/OFCR SFTY/M. WRIGHT 01797 001-400-2101-4316 06/07/88 POLICE 00230 $60.00 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H VIKI *COPELAND REG/SUMMER SESS/CSUDH $60.00 00041 001-400-1202-4316 00195 $268.00 05/23/88 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************************w**************** H FIRE RADIO SERVICE 02302 001-400-2201-4307 • FCC LICENSE RENEWAL 06/08/88 FIRE $268.00 00029 $325.00 /RADIO MAINTENANCE ***-VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************+!****************** H ROBERT*LANDRY FINAL CLAIM SETTLEMENT $325.00 02300 705-400-1209-4324 00048 $338.77 05/26/88 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************+►****************** H LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES MEETING/E. SIMPSON H LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES MEETING/CTY MGR REP 00842 001-400-1101-4317 00246 06/02/88 CITY COUNCIL 00842 001-400-1201-4317 00134 06/02/88 CITY MANAGER $338.77 $16.00 /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $16.00 /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $32.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H PEACE OFCRS ASSOC OF LA COUNTY REG/SALDANA/GARRETT 00729 001-400-2101-4316 05/26/88 POLICE 00228 $70.00 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H POSTMASTER BULK MAIL POSTAGE/CITES $70.00 00398 110-400-3302-4305 00416 *2,000.00 06/07/88 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 06117 26599 $0.00 06/09/88 06320 26598 $0.00 06/09/88 06220 26589 30.00 06/09/88 05338 26601 $0.00 06/09/88 05839 26591 $0.00 06/09/88 04091 26594 $0.00 06/09/88 04091 26594 $0.00 06/09/88 06309 26592 $0.00 06/09/88 06125 26600 $0.00 06/09/88 ib6 • •I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • E • • 4 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND 4 ACCOUNT -NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT 'DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL **********a*****.w**************** ********* HHHt *w**a************ H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT • ' RETIREMENT/APRIL 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT • RETIREMENT/APRIL 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT RETIREMENT/APRIL 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT RETIREMENT/APRIL 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT RETIREMENT/APRIL 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT RETIREMENT/APRIL 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT RETIREMENT/APRIL 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT RETIREMENT/APRIL 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT RETIREMENT/APRIL 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT RETIREMENT/APRIL 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT RETIREMENT/APRIL 88 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT RETIREMENT/APRIL 88 SYS. 00026 05/19/88 SYS. 00026 05/19/88 SYS. 00026 05/19/88 SYS. 00026 05/19/88 8Y8. 00026 05/19/88 8Y8, 00026 05/19/88 SYS. 00026 05/19/88 SYS. 00026 05/19/88 SYS. 00026 05/19/88 SYS. 00026 05/19/88 SYS. 00026 05/19/88 SYS. 00026 05/19/88 001-400-1213-4180 '-'00216 RETIREMENT 001-400-1213-4180 00217 RETIREMENT PAGE 0002 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $2.000.00 378, 040. 35 /RETIREMENT $78. 490. 23CR /RETIREMENT 105-400-2601-4180 00072 $916.03 STREET LIGHTING /RETIREMENT 110-400-3301-4180 00072 VEH PKO DIST 110-400-3302-4180 00072 PARKING ENF 115-400-3101-4180 00045 MEDIANS 115-400-3104-4180 00045 TRAFFIC SAFETY 145-400-3401-4180' 00045 DIAL A RIDE 145-400-3402-4180 ESEA $270.43 /RETIREMENT $4,240.22 /RETIREMENT $990.18 /RETIREMENT $687.25 /RETIREMENT 3125. 16 /RETIREMENT 00045 $150.02 /RETIREMENT 145-400-3407-4180 00012 $38.23 COMTR BUS STUDY /RETIREMENT 155-400-2102-4180 00045 CROSSING GUARD 160-400-3102-4180 00072 SEWER/ST DRAIN $92.01 /RETIREMENT $866.87 /RETIREMENT *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************************4*************** 37.926.52 H ROBINSON'S FIRE DEPT BEDDING 02301 001-400-2201-4309 00444 $298.05 05/26/88 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 *0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 26445 06/09/88 26445 06/09/88 26445 06/09/88 26445 06/09/88 26445 06/09/88 26445 06/09/88 26445 06/09/88 26445 06/09/88 26445 06/09/88 26445 06/09/88 26445 06/09/88 26445 06/09/88 05333 26593 $0.00 06/09/88 0 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ******+raw********a**w**********a**********************s***w********* H SELF INSURERS SERVICE. INC. REIMS WORK COMP/BRISSON 11134 H SELF INSURERS SERVICE. INC. REIMB WORK COMP/APR 88 H SELF INSURERS SERVICE, INC. REIMS WORK COMP/MAY 88 * * * H SELF INSURERS SERVICE. INC. REIMS WORK COMP/APR 88 H SELF INSURERS SERVICE. INC. REIMB WORK COMP/MAY 88 VENDOR TOTAL 00824 705-400-1217-4182 00055 05/26/88 WORKERS COMP 00824 705-400-1217-4182 00056 06/07/88 WORKERS COMP 00824 705-400-1217-4182 00057 06/07/88 WORKERS COMP 00824 705-400-1217-4183 00044 06/07/88 WORKERS COMP 00824 705-400-1217-4183 00045 06/07/88 WORKERS COMP PAGE 0003 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $298.05 $13.750.00 /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR *6,676.98 /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR $14.429.04 /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR *1.600.75 /WORKERS COMP PRIOR YR $2.095.70 /WORKERS COMP PRIOR YR **********************************a********************************* H MARK *WRIGHT MEALS/OFCR SFTY CLASS 00133 001-400-2101-4316 06/07/88 POLICE $38,552.47 00229 $14.50 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************************4************ $14.50 *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************a****w*******a*****w*w**************************** $49,986.44 R MONYEAN*ACUNA ANIMAL TRAP REFUND E11134 05838 26590 $0.00 06/09/88 05848 26595 $0.00 06/09/88 05848 26595 $0.00 06/09/88 05848 26595 $0.00 06/09/88 05848 26595 $0.00 06/09/88 06321 26596 $0.00 06/09/88 02298 001-210-0000-2110 02212 $50.00 58106 05933 58106 06/06/88 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00 R ADVANCE ELEVATOR ELEV MAINT/JUNE 88 00003 001-400-4204-4201 00246 19904 06/01/88 BLDG MAINT $80.00 19904 00003 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS PRISONER MEALS/MAY 88 ..,,A44,%5044 riiAa44,44,S ark u:W4xfie 00857 001-400-2101-4306 05/31/88 POLICE $80.00 00527 *65.00 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 26606 06/09/88 26607 ' 06/09/88 00053 26608 $0.00 06/09/88 • 0 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************************** ******** R AUTOMOTIVE PAINT CENTER PAGE 0004 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO N CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *65. 00 01891 115-400-3104-4309 00549 *328.81 MISC CHCS/MAY 88 05/31/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *328.81 R BANK OF AMERICA •BANK CHCS/FEB-APR 88 R BANK OF AMERICA BANK CHCS/FEB-APR 88 01195 001-400-1141-4201 00046 04/30/88 CITY TREASURER 01195 001-400-1202-4201 00133 04/30/88 FINANCE ADMIN $1,755.68 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *851. 48 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *2.607. 16 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BANNER SIGN COMPANY 00834 001-400-4601-4305 00507 *47.93 TENNIS COURT SIGNS 05/30/88 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *47.93 R BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY. INC. GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 5807 01889 001-400-4204-4309 00952 05/26/88 BLDG MAINT *141.23 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *141.23 R BAUER COATING & CHEMICALS ST PAINT SPRAY RIG PARTS 33783 R BAUER COATING & CHEMICALS PAINT SPRAY RIO PARTS 33470 00251 115-400-3104-4309 00551 05/17/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00251 115-400-3104-4309 00552 05/23/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY *319. 57 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *252. 68 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *572. 25 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BEAR SALES & SERVICE, INC. ENGINE ANALYZER PARTS 39816 00430 001-400-4205-4309 00272 $104.58 06/06/88 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *104.58 R BELL & HOWELL MICROFICHE MACHINE SUPPL 26875 00553 26609 *0.00 06/09/88 06223 26610 *0.00 06/09/88 06223 26610 *0.00 06/09/88 04864 26611 *0. 00 06/09/88. 5807 06419 26612 *0.00 06/09/88 33783 05787 26613 *321. 16 06/09/88 33470 05739 26613 *0.00 06/09/88 39816 06407 26614 *0.00 06/09/88 00563 001-400-4201-4305 00303 *176.05 345667/326875 04942 05/25/88 . BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *176.04 26615 06/09/88 • • • r ,o FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE •INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************+HHS****************************** R BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 54 MISC CHGS/MAY 88 *** VENDOR TOTAL [- - * *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************************** ************************* PAGE 0005 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO M CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $176.05 00005 001-400-1208-4305 00510 $1.272:84 05/31/88 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ******************************************************************** R -BRAUN LINEN SERVICE .PRIS LAUNDRY/MAY 88 00163 001-400-2101-4306 05/31/88 POLICE $1.272.84 00528 $59.52 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES DUMP CHGS/MAY 88 37002 *59.52 00056 26616 $0.00 06/09/88 00057 26617 $0.00 06/09/88 00158 001-400-3103-4201 00162 $2,828.38 80500-0037002 00004 26618 05/31/88 • ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/MAY 88 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/MAY 88 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/MAY 88 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMS PETTY CASH/MAY 88 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/MAY 88 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/MAY 88 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMS PETTY CASH/MAY 88 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMS PETTY CASH/MAY 88 . .. .. �...rf0':... (..`. fi..: •:J✓!$5!1.YY�lEfY' - :�!v.r:;"f' `d~f ni $2.828.38 02016 001-400-1101-4305 00177 $20.31 06/01/88 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 02016 001-400-1122-4305 00058 $4.74 06/01/88 ELECTIONS /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 02016 001-400-1201-4317 00135 $16.00 06/01/88 CITY MANAGER /CONFERENCE EXPENSE 02016 001-400-1202-4305 00158 $28.76 06/01/88 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 02016 001-400-1203-4316 00128 06/01/88 PERSONNEL 02016 001-400-1205-4316 00031 06/01/88 CABLE TV 02016 001-400-2101-4305 00717 06/01/88 POLICE 02016 001-400-2101-4316 00231 $50.10 06/01/88 POLICE /TRAINING $17.00 /TRAINING $25.00 /TRAINING $80.25 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 05938 26619 $0.00 06/09/88 05938 26619 $0.00 06/09/88 05938 26619 $0.00 06/09/88 05938 26619 $0.00 06/09/88 05938 26619 $0.00 06/09/88 05938 26619 $0.00 06/09/88 05938 26619 $0.00 06/09/88 05938 26619 $0.00 06/09/88 • i FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R QARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/MAY 88 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMS PETTY CASH/MAY 88 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMS PETTY CASH/MAY 88 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/MAY 88 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/MAY 08 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/MAY 88 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 • VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC' PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02016 001-400-2201-4311 00214 06/01/88 FIRE 02016 "001-400-2201-4316 00125 06/01/88 FIRE 02016 001-400-4202-4201 00187 06/01/88 PUB WKS ADMIN 02016 001-400-4202-4305 00285 06/01/88 PUB WKS ADMIN 02016 001-400-4601-4319 00227 06/01/88 COMM RESOURCES 02016 110-400-3302-4309 00412 06/01/88 PARKING ENF $14.20 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $17.00 /TRAINING PAGE 0006 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1.45 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $14.53 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $16.92 /SPECIAL EVENTS $21.27 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $327.53 R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CHECK SERV/APR 88 55562 R BSI CONSULTANTS. INC. PLAN CHECK SERV/APR 88 55562 00630 001-400-4201-4201 00096 05/05/88 BUILDING 00630 001-400-4201-4201 00097 05/05/88 BUILDING 05938 26619 $0.00 06/09/88 05938 26619 $0.00 06/09/88 05938 26619 $0.00 06/09/88 05938 26619 $0.00 06/09/88 05938 26619 $0.00 06/09/88 05938 26619 $0.00 06/09/88 $1.837.82 55562 04932 26620 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/09/88 *1.481.10 55562 04950 26620 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3.318.92 R C.E. W. LIGHTINQ CAL.. INC. ST LITES/HERMOSA AVENUE /4046 02280 105-400-2601-4309 00346 $198.09 3887/4046 05769 26621 05/23/88 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $198.09 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. PARK SERV/MAY 88 50085 R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. INC: ADDL SERV REQUESTED 50085 00599 001-400-6101-4201 05/31/88 PARKS $198.09 00111 $7.483.33 8050085 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00599 125-400-8502-4201 00063 05/31/88 CIP 85-502 $360.00 8050085 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $7,843.33 R CABLE EXCHANGE MOVE POLICE COMPUTERS 01415 001-400-8606-4201 00017 $955.29 ' 4908 05/06/88 CIP 87-606 /CONTRACT SERVICE PRIVATE 06417 26622 $0.00 06/09/88 06417 26622 $0.00 06/09/88 4908 06305 26623 $0.00 06/09/88 • • • • A '[ FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DE8CRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ***************************************** **a********************* R CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES. INC. PROPERTY INS/DISPATCH 08644 PAGE 0007 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO * CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $955.29 00038 705-400-1210-4201 00011 $3.220.00 1008644 05/19/88 AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICIALS DUES/BILL GROVE $3. 220.00 00411 001-400-4201-4315 00072 $115.00 05/19/88 BUILDING /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLINGS/MAY 88 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLINGS/MAY 88 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLINGS/MAY 88 00016 001-400-4204-4303 00233 05/31/88 BLDG MAINT 00016 001-400-6101-4303 00202 05/31/88 PARKS 00016 115-400-3101-4303 05/31/88 MEDIANS $115.00 $367.34 /UTILITIES *783.18 /UTILITIES 00158 $2.284.66 /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BERNARD B.*CAMACHO CITE PMT REFUND 02291. 110-300-0000-3302 92856 06/02/88 $3.435.18 05840 26624 $0.00 06/09/88 04949 26625 $0.00 06/09/88 06233 26626 $0.00 06/09/88 06233 26626 $0.00 06/09/88 06233 26626 $0.00 06/09/88 21366 $46.00 692856 06228 26627 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CAO/HUMAN RESOURCES 3RD QUARTER SERVICES $46.00 00587 001-400-1203-4251 00086 $828.88 054 05/25/88 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GRETCHEN RAE*CASSIDY CITE PMT REFUND 02293 110-300-0000-3302 21364 06/02/88 $828.88 $181.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CENTER FOR URBAN POLICY RES. PUBLICATIONS $181.00 02304 001-400-4101-4316 00104 $37.00 05/23/88 • PLANNING /TRAINING 054 05841 26628 $0.00 06/09/88 06230 26629 $0.00 06/09/88 06008 26630 $0.00 06/09/88 O to • • • • • • 1- . __ . FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION •,CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0008 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO Si CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL **************aaiwa**a*********************************** ********a• $37.00 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC CHCS/MAY 88 00014 001-400-4201-4311 00119 $21.26 05/31/88 BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE .*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $21.26 R CINTAS CORPORATION - UNIFORM RENT/MAY 88 R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENT/MAY 88 00153 • 001-400-4202-4187 00090 05/31/88 PUB WKS ADMIN 00153 110-400-3302-4187 00134 05/31/88 PARKING ENF $508.51 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $42.00 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $550.51 *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************►************************************************ R COAST IRRIGATION CO. REPAIR BACKFLOW FOR PARK 94341 R COAST IRRIGATION CO. REPAIR BACKFLOW FOR PARK 94341 00354 001-400-6101-4309 00507 05/25/88 PARKS 00354 115-400-3101-4309 00287 05/25/88 MEDIANS $1,324.86 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $655.61 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************+************************************i►************ R COAST TURF & UTILITY SUPPLY VALLEY PARK REPAIRS 23006 02289 125-400-8508-4201 00003 05/18/88 CIP 85-508 $1.980.47 00059 26631 $0.00 06/09/88 00002 26632 $0.00 06/09/88 00002 26632 $0.00 06/09/88 94341 05762 26633 $1.324.86 06/09/88 94341 05762 26633 $733.25 06/09/88 $977.40 823006 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R COLICH & SONS BEACH DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS 7770 02294 115-400-8302-4201 00022 05/27/88 CIP 87-302 $977.40 $154.949.40 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R COM SYSTEMS: INC LONG DISTANCE/MAY 88 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MAY 88 $154.949.40 00017 001-400-1101-4304 00170 $3.58 05/31/88 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-1121-4304 00161 $0.35 05/31/88 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE 05744 26634 $0.00 06/09/88 7770 06426 26635 $0.00 06/09/88 06235 26636 ' $0.00 06/09/88 06235 26636 $0.00 06/09/88 1 gib • v SID d FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R COM LONG R COM LONG R COM LONG R COM LONG R COM LONG R COM LONG R COM LONG R COM LONG R COM LONG R COM LONG R COM LONG R R R SYSTEMS. INC DISTANCE/MAY 88 SYSTEMS, INC DISTANCE/MAY 88 SYSTEMS. INC DISTANCE/MAY 88 SYSTEMS. INC DISTANCE/MAY 88 SYSTEMS. INC DISTANCE/MAY 88 SYSTEMS. INC DISTANCE/MAY 88 SYSTEMS. INC DISTANCE/MAY 88 SYSTEMS. INC DISTANCE/MAY 88 SYSTEMS. INC DISTANCE/MAY 88 SYSTEMS, INC DISTANCE/MAY 88 SYSTEMS. INC DISTANCE/MAY 88 COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MAY 88 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND * ACCOUNT 'NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE'INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00017 001-400-1141-4304 00159 05/31/88 CITY TREASURER 00017 001-400-1201-4304 00171 05/31/88 CITY MANAGER 00017 001-400-1202-4304 00176 05/31/88 FINANCE ADMIN 00017 .. 001-400-1203-4304 00175 05/31/88 PERSONNEL • 00017 001-400-2101-4304 00251' 05/31/88 POLICE 00017 001-400-2401-4304 00164 05/31/88 ANIMAL CONTROL 00017 001-400-4101-4304 00177 05/31/88 PLANNING 00017 001-400-4201-4304 00175 05/31/88 BUILDING 00017 001-400-4202-4304 • 00177 05/31/88 PUB.WKS ADMIN 00017 001-400-4601-4304 00194 05/31/88 COMM RESOURCES 00017 105-400-2601-4304 00087 05/31/88 STREET LIGHTING 00017 110-400-3302-4304 00173 05/31/88 PARKING ENF $33.43 /TELEPHONE *12.43 /TELEPHONE $15.50 /TELEPHONE $6.28 /TELEPHONE $236.32 /TELEPHONE $2.11 /TELEPHONE $5.22 /TELEPHONE $8.16 /TELEPHONE $82.97 /TELEPHONE $40.65 /TELEPHONE $18.36 /TELEPHONE $49.37 /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** COMMUNITY TRANSIT SERVICES _ COMM BUS SERV/APR 88 11252 COMMUNITY TRANSIT SERVICES COMM BUS SERV/MAY 88 11392 s a 1,40 01569 145-400-3402-4201 04/27/88 ESEA 01569 145-400-3402-4201 05/21/88 ESEA PAGE 0009 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO M CHK A AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $514.73 06235 26636 $0.00 06/09/88 06235 26636 $0.00 06/09/88 06235 26636 $0.00 06/09/88 06235 26636 $0.00 06/09/88 06235 26636 $0.00 06/09/88 06235 26636 $0.00 06/09/88 06235 26636 $0.00 06/09/88 06235 26636 $0.00 06/09/88 06235 26636 $0.00 06/09/88 06235 26636 $0.00 06/09/88 06235 26636 $0.00 06/09/88 06235 26636 $0.00 06/09/88 00122 $4.413.44 11252 06011 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 26637 06/09/88 00123 $4.159.69 11392 06012 26637 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/09/88 c _ 0 • • • •I • • 1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION •.CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0010 FOR 06/14/88 DATE 06/09/88 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ********•a*** ******* **a•i►******** ********* ►**** ********* *******a• $8.573.13 R COMPUADD CORPORATION - 02303 --001-400-4202-4305 00290 49.49 362624 06406 26638 DISK STORAGE BOX 62624 05/24/88 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 40.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** 49.49 R VIKI *COPELAND REIMB BOOKS/PKG/CSUDH 00041- 001-400-1202-4316 00196 470.30 06232 26639 06/08/88 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING $0.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *70.30 R THE *COPY SHOP 00022 110-400-3302-4305 00420 4482.45 06101 26640 PRINT SERV/PKG 05/25/88 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 40.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $482.45 R CRAIN AUTO ELECTRIC 02288 001-400-2201-4311 00216 4107.06 8630 05334 26641 FIRE ENGINE PARTS 8630 05/24/88 FIRE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 40.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $107.06 R L. N.*CURTIS & SON 00850 001-400-2201-4309 00447 483.50 57478 05331 26642 HOSE CLAMPS 57478 05/24/88 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 40.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 483.50 R DAPPER TIRE CO. 01390 105-400-2601-4311 00096 $142.67 00512 26643 MISC CHCS/MAY 88 05/31/88 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4142.67 R DATA SAFE COMP TAPE STOR/TO 5/11 36823 05/12/88 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 481.00 00156 001-400-1206-4201 00384 481.00 36823 00047 26644 R DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SERV 01857 001-400-2101-4251 00202 $133.68 AWWS SERV/APR 88 5823 05/06/88 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 5823 00046 26645 40.00 06/09/88 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • d FINANCE-SFA340 'T/ME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST ' FOR 06/14/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$w $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ ►**w*** R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HWY MAINT/MAR 88 04799 R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HWY MAINT/MAR 88 04799 PAGE 0011 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO M CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $133.68 00267 105-400-2601-4251 00057 3611.52 04/29/88 STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 00267 115-400-3104-4251 00055 04/29/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY 3611.52 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************►s***************************** R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION PD COMP MAINT/4TH QTR 93288 00269 001-400-2101-4201 05/31/88 POLICE $1.223. 04 104799 06405 26646 $0.00 06/09/88 104799 06405 26646 $0.00 06/09/88 00261 $396.00 37693288 00006 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 $396.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R EASY READER PUBLIC NOTICES/MAY 88 00181 001-400-1121-4323 00022 $1,050.75 0268 05/31/88 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHGS/MAY 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHG8/MAY 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 88 AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-2101-4311 •00502 05/31/88 POLICE 00165 001-400-2401-4311 00117 05/31/88 ANIMAL CONTROL 00165 001-400-3103-4311 00352 05/31/88 ST MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-4101-4311 00078 05/31/88 PLANNING 00165 001-400-4201-4311 00120 05/31/88 BUILDING 00165 - .001-400-4202-4311 00084 05/31/88 PUB WKS ADMIN 00165 001-400-4204-4311 00093 05/31/88 BLDG MAINT 31, 030.73 $601.63 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 3160.42 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $52.77 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $17.15 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $22.84 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $106.62 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $9.34 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 26647 06/09/88 0268 04538 26648 $0.00 06/09/88 00516 26649 $0.00 06/09/88 00516 26649 $0.00 06/09/88 00516 26649 $0.00 06/09/88 00516 26649 $0.00 06/09/88 00516 26649 $0.00 06/09/88 00516 26649 $0.00 06/09/88 00516 26649 $0.00 06/09/88 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC CHCS/MAY 88 AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS -- AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 PAGE 0012 DATE 06/09/88 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK M DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00165 001-400-4205-4309 00271 05/31/88 EQUIP SERVICE 00165-_..--"-001-400-4205-4311 00097 05/31/88 EQUIP SERVICE $91.08 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $48.59 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-6101-4311 00155 $9.16 05/31/88 PARKS /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 105-400-2601-4309 00345 $86.05 05/31/88 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00165 105-400-2601-4311 00098 $263.25 05/31/88 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 110-400-3302-4311 00372 $539.85 05/31/88 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 115-400-3104-4311 00063 $37.10 05/31/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL ************* ►**** ►*gra************* **** ►*********** r*+ ************* $2,045.85 R EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICES INC. JANITOR SERV/MAY 88 01294 001-400-4204-4201 •00247 $1.190.00 05/31/88 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,190.00 R F. MORTON PITT GUN LOCKERS 00516 26649 $0.00 06/09/88 00516 26649 $0.00 06/09/88 00516 26649 $0.00 06/09/88 00516 26649 $0.00 06/09/88 00516 26649 $0.00 06/09/88 00516 26649 $0.00 06/09/88 00516 26649 $0.00 06/09/88 06425 26650 $0.00 06/09/88 00210 001-400-2101-4309 00146 $532.10 6070 06316 26651 6070 05/25/88 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R FILARSKY & WATT LEGAL SERV/MAY 88 $532.10 00055 001-400-1203-4201 00325 $2.362.50 05/31/88 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $2,362.50 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R FRANKSONS, INC. 00010 110-400-3302-4311 00374 $164.93 CUSHMAN PARTS 12130 05/10/88 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE 05844 26652 $0.00 06/09/88 12130 06107 26653 $156.13 06/09/88 • • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $ AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL www*****w**w********************w*********************************** R GANDALF DATA. INC. PAGE 0013 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO N CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $164.93 01432 001-400-1206-4201 00385 $510.00 -- 4TH QTR PRINTER MAINT 7098 05/17/88 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY MISC CHGS/MAY 88 R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY ST LITE POLES 02183 R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY FISHING PIER PARTS 00058 05/31/88 00058 05/31/88 00058 05/31/88 00058 05/20/88 00058 05/10/88 $510.00 001-400-4204-4309 00948' ... .. '$420.18 - BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 7098 00019 26654 $0.00 06/09/88 00518 26655 $0.00 06/09/88 001-400-6101-4309 00503 $108.01 00518 26655 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 06/09/88 001-400-8606-4309 00006 $111.87 00518 26655 CIP 87-606 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 06/09/88 105-400-2601-4309 00347 $1.616.67 402183 05461 26655 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $1.522.95 06/09/88 105-400-8201-4201 '00035-- $741.24 05431 26655 . CIP 85-201 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************************************w******* $2.997.97 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/MAY 88' R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAY 88 00015 05/31/88 001-400-1101-4304 00169 • $38.19 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1122-4304 00024 *50.40 05/31/88 ELECTIONS /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00103 $222.29 05/31/88 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 00015 05/31/88 001-400-1141-4304 00158 CITY TREASURER $41:24 /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00170 "" $82.47 05/31/88 00015 05/31/88 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 001-400-1202-4304 "'00175 $61.10 " "- FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 "26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 '26657-- $0.00 $0.00 06/09/88 s FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHGS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHOS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAV es. R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHOS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHOS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAY 88 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00174 05/31/88 PERSONNEL 00015 " "001-400-1206-4304 00104 05/31/88 DATA PROCESSING 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00089 05/31/88 BUS LICENSE 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00250 05/31/88 POLICE 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00110 05/31/88 FIRE 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00163 05/31/88 ANIMAL CONTROL 00015 001-400-2701-4304 00068 05/31/88 CIVIL DEFENSE 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00176 05/31/88 PLANNING 00015 001-400-4201-4304 .00174 05/31/88 BUILDING 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00176 05/31/88 PUB WKS ADMIN 00015 05/31/88 001-400-4204-4321 00356 BLDG MAINT 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00193 05/31/88 COMM RESOURCES 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00103 05/31/88 • PARKS 00015 05/31/88 110-400-3301-4304 00083 VEH PKG DIST 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00172 05/31/88 PARKING ENF $27.49 /TELEPHONE $244.59 /TELEPHONE $33.37 /TELEPHONE $460.92 /TELEPHONE $214.34 /TELEPHONE $4.58 /TELEPHONE $4.20 /TELEPHONE $102.33 /TELEPHONE $114.56 /TELEPHONE $284.55 /TELEPHONE PAGE 0014 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO N CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $18.52 /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT $234.92 /TELEPHONE $1.53 /TELEPHONE $19.16 /TELEPHONE $210.75 /TELEPHONE 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 $0.00 06/09/88 es • • 1 • • • • • • • • •' • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELE CHCS/MAY 88 R GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - TELE CHCS/MAY 88 *** . CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE'INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 145-400-3401-4304 00004 •16.66 05/31/88 DIAL A RIDE /TELEPHONE 00015 145-400-3402-4304 00004 416.66 05/31/88 ESEA /TELEPHONE VENDOR TOTAL **************************************************** ►*************** R NIEVES*GONZALES ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 02297 -001-210-0000-2110 58028 06/06/88 PAGE 0015 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $2,504.82 06238 26657 40.00 06/09/88 06238 26657 40.00 06/09/88 02213 450.00 58028 05934 26658 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 40.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R HALPRIN SUPPLY COMPANY GLOVES/PUBLIC WORKS 92355 $50.00 00946 105-400-2601-4309 00348 4137.17 9259/92355 05/16/88 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $137.17 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R HARRIS & ASSOCIATES ENG SERV/APR 88 02102 160-400-8405-4201 00016 421.615.00 4 05/13/88 CIP 85-405 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 421.615.00 R HERMOSA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 00322 001-400-2401-4201 00177 4130.00 MISC SERV/MAY 88 05/31/88 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY MODEM CABLE 46126 4130.00 05718 26659 40.00 06/09/88 4 06410 26660 *0.00 06/09/88 00519 26661 40.00 06/09/88 00403 001-400-1206-4305 00302 477.21 10746126 06105 04/25/88 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 40.00 $77.21 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY COMP SYS MAINT/JUNE 88 30158 R HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY VECTRA DISC DRIVE C3742 00149 - 001-400-1206-4201 00383 41.056.00 Z130158 00009 06/01/88 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00 00149 001-400-1206-5400 00162 43.113.85 04/07/88 DATA PROCESSING /EQUIPMENT 26662 06/09/88 26663 06/09/88 7BC3742 05277 26663 40.00 06/09/88 1 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ,CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ************* ******aw**********wt****4H******gra******************a** R ALFRED*HIGGINS PRODUCTIONS, INC TAPE/DRUGS AND YOUR MIND 6629 01651 001-400-2101-4305 00721 05/25/88 POLICE PACE 0016 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $4,169.85 4228. 85 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************************x**************** R IMPERIAL RADIATOR, INC. RADIATOR RECORE 15119 $228.85 01073 001-400-4202-4311 00085 $120.34 05/13/88 PUB WKS ADMIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE METER USE/MAINT/MAR-JUN *120. 34 00068 001-400-1208-4201 00447 $1,432.03 06/01/88 CEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JONCICH. STURM & ASSOCIATES SERV/CIP 86-602 1009 R JONCICH. STURM & ASSOCIATES PD REMODEL SERV 1004 02159 001-400-8602-4201 00015 05/11/88 CIP 86-602 02159 05/12/88 001-400-8606-4201 .00018 CIP 87-606 $1.432.03 $805.75 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $2,130.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE PRIVATE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,935.75 R JUNS ELECTRONICS DESKTOP SCANNERS 02099 001-400-2101-4305 14484 05/18/88 POLICE 00722*695.98 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JOHN*KEARIN MEALS/INSTRUCTORS COURSE 01032 001-400-2101-4312 05/23/88 - POLICE $695.98 00674 $36.25 /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $36.25 R KERN EQUIPMENT CO. SWEEPER PARTS 00284 001-400-3103-4311 00353 $161.13 9278 04/20/88 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 6629 05676 26664 $226.85 06/09/88 15119 05784 26665 4120.34 06/09/88 06225 26666 $0.00 06/09/88 1009 02159 26667 $0.00 06/09/88 1004 05797 26667 $0.00 06/09/88 14484 05651 26668 $691.98 06/09/88 06318 26669 $0.00 06/09/88 9278 05753 26670 $0.00 06/09/88 • • • yoi • • • • 1 4 • 4 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION • CITY OF HERMO8A BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC" PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL •********************* ***************n***** Hrw *rw**r********a* R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHCS/MAY 88 00167 001-400-4201-4305 00300 05/31/88 BUILDING 00167 001-400-4204-4309 00947 05/31/88 BLDG MAINT 00167 001-400-8606-4309 00003 05/31/88 CIP 87-606 00167 110-400-3302-4309 00413 05/31/88 PARKING ENF PAGE 0017 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO N CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *161.13 $27.67 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $409. 84 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *440. 78 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *12. 12 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************************************+r*** *890.41 R JOY*LEEPER PLUMBING PERMIT REFUND 59524 02287 001-300-0000-3206 05/24/88 01142 *128.00 /PLUMBING PERMITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *128.00 R LIEBERT. CASSIDY & FRIERSON LEGAL SERV/APR 88 02175 705-400-1209-4324 .00049 *56.25 • 05/23/88 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *56.25 I • • • R LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION PUBLICATIONS/BUILDING 02286 001-400-4201-4305 00304 05/24/88 BUILDING . *65. 00 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *65.00 R JEREMY*LOEB THEATRE TECH/MAY 88 R JEREMY*LOEB THEATRE TECH/MAY 88 02078 001-400-4601-4201 00197 05/31/88 COMM RESOURCES 02078 001-400-4601-4201 00198 05/31/88 COMM RESOURCES *160. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *360. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *520.00 R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE. INC. M1SC CHOS/MAY 88 • ••11.:•:::.•.% .. ;aim dZtY!dai%x 00077 001-400-4202-4305 00286 1646.86 05/31/88 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES VARVARIPTAISMANI • 00523 26671 *0.00 06/09/88 00523 26671 *0.00 06/09/88 00523 26671 *0.00 06/09/88 00523 26671 $0.00 06/09/88 59524 04951 26672 *0.00 06/09/88 05837 26673 *0.00 06/09/88 04924 26674 $0.00 06/09/88 04869 26675 *0.00 06/09/88 04866 26675 $0.00 06/09/88 00525 26676 $0.00 06/09/88 • er • • • • • • V • 41. • • • s • 1 a• FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION -"CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC - PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ******* *******************************4H1************************ R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. UNIFORM EXP/MALDONADO 1890 PAGE 0018 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO N CHK 4 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *46.86 01320 110-400-3302-4187 00135 497.82 04/22/88 PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LOS ANGELES CO DISTRICT ATTY FEB LEGAL SERV 2-14 *97.82 00386 001-400-1131-4251 00064 *201.39 05/25/88 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * R LOS ANGELES EQUIPMENT SALES CASH REGISTER TAPES 4236 *201.39 01350 001-400-1202-4305 00159 *40.43 05/13/88 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JAMES P. *LOUGH EXTRA LEG SERV/MAY 88 R JAMES P.*LOUGH EXTRA LEG SERV/MAY 88 00938 001-400-1131-4201 00381 05/31/88 CITY ATTORNEY 00938 705-400-1209-4201 .00048 05/31/88 LIABILITY INS *40. 43 *4.717.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $3.805.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 48.523.00 R LOUIS THE TAILOR. INC. MISC CHCS/MAY 88 . 00079 110-400-3302-4187 00133 $417.48 05/31/88 PARKING ENF. /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************.*********************** $417.48 R M&K METALS STEEL TUBING/UNIT 24 00777 105-400-2601-4311 00099 433.40 4683 05/20/88 • STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *33.40 R MANHATTAN CAR WASH MISC CHGS/APR 88 01146 001-400-2101-4311 04/30/88 POLICE 00501 $46.95 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 1890 05284 26677 40.00 06/09/88 2-14 04952 26678 40.00 06/09/88 4236 06213 26679 40.00 06/09/88 04092 26680 40.00 06/09/88 04092 26680 $0.00 06/09/88 00526 26681 $0.00 06/09/88 4683 06402 26682 $0.00 06/09/88 00428 26683 40.00 06/09/88 • • I • 4 • • i • I FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 . CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88• PAGE 0019 DATE 06/09/88 PAY VENDOR NAME VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK N DESCRIPTION DATE'INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************** ******************►w********* 446.95 R MANHATTAN FORD ' 00605 001-400-2201-4311 00215 46.18 00529 26684 MISC CHCS/MAY 88 05/31/88 FIRE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 40.00 06/09/88 R MANHATTAN FORD 00605 105-400-2601-4311 00097 411.18 00529 26684 MISC CHCS/MAY 88 05/31/88 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE 40.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 417.36 R MARINEBANC LEASING CO.. INC. 02154 001-400-4205-6900 00008 4417.96 00054 26685 LEASE PMT/JUNE 88 06/01/88 EQUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS 40.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4417.96 R PAM*MC ELWAIN 02283 001-400-1205-4201 00023 4370.00 CATV SUBSCRIBER SURVEY - 06/08/88 CABLE TV /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4370.00 06112 26686 4370.00 06/09/88 R MCI MAIL 02153 001-400-1206-4304 . 00103 410.00 06236 26687 ELEC MAIL SERV/APR 88 05/10/88 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 40.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 410.00 R MERRELL PAINT COMPANY 00087 001-400-4204-4309 00951 4160.82 12717 05771 26688 REPAIR PAINT SPRAYER 12717 05/24/88 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4160.82 4160.82 06/09/88 R MICHAEL/JUDI*MIRABELLI 02290 110-300-0000-3302 21367 441.00 639699 06227 26689 /COURT FINES/PARKING 40.00 06/09/88 CITE PMT REFUND 39699 06/02/88 ***• VENDOR TOTAL***************************************w**************************** R MONARCH BROOM MISC CHCS/MAY 88 $41.00 00084 001-400-3103-4309 00646 $357.84 05/31/88 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00530 26690 40.00 06/09/88 • • V • •• i FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ************** a****** *****w ***** ********* ******************awn* R MOSLER SAFE COMPANY REPAIR NIGHT DEPOSIT PAGE 0020 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO * CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *357. 84 00090 001-400-1202-4201 00134 *193.67 211-57627 06212 57627 05/26/88 FINANCE ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 $193.67 P** VENDOR TOTAL*a***a***a*a**w*w**w**a***www*a**wwaw*w***w****n****w******n*n*ww*a* R NABER TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES •REG/M. HAUGEN 00656 001-400-2101-4313 05/12/88 POLICE 00153 10167.92 /TRAVEL EXPENSE. STC *** VENDOR TOTAL*****n****w*********************aw********w********w****a*n*w*w***** R OCE BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. REMOVAL CHG/COPY MACHINE 56124 02042 001-400-2101-405 02/29/88 POLICE 16167.92 00720 *200.00 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTALn*******a*********n****w*****w**********************aww**w********** R OCHOA & SILLAS LEGAL SERV/MAY 88 R OCHOA & SILLAS LEGAL SERV/APRIL 88 00095 705-400-1204-4201 00049 1996 05/31/88 LIABILITY INS 00095 705-400-1209-4201 00050 1875 04/30/88 LIABILITY INS 16200.00 *250. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 8371. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL*nw*******ww*►****n**********w*******w*s***********na************w** *621.00 R OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER REPAIR CHEV MALIBU 00093 110-400-3302-4311 00373 *355.57 04/14/88 PARKING'ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL************n*w**a****n**w**w**n**************a*********w******w**** R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE PD COMP HOOKUP/MAY 88 *355. 57 00321 001-400-2101-4304 00249 *136.26 05/06/88 POLICE /TELEPHONE ***VENDOR TOTAL*n*ww*n*wn*www*************a**n*an*****n**w*****************w**, ..x,*** *136.26 R PEP BOYS 00608 110-400-3302-4311 00371 *64.08 MISC CHCS/MAY 88 56366 05/31/88 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE 26691 06/09/88 06308 26692 160.00 06/09/88 556124 06328 26693 *0.00 06/09/88 1996 05845 26694 *0.00 06/09/88 1875 05835 26694 *0.00 06/09/88 05279 26695 50.00 06/09/88 00036 26696 *0.00 06/09/88 56366 00534 26697 80.00 06/09/88 • • • r . I FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC' PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************wnw a******** t********* **** ************** R BRUCE*PHILLIPS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 00534-` 001-400-2101-4310 06/02/88 POLICE -_ PAGE 0021 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO * CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $64.08 00139 $20.40 /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************+t**************************** R POSTAL INSTANT PRESS PRINT SERV/COMM RES $20. 40 00296 001-400-4601-4302 00029 8229.45 /4111 05/25/88 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R FRED*PRYOR SEMINARS. INC. SEM REG/M. TERCERO 19016 $229.45 00298 001-400-1205-4316 00032 $98.00 05/16/88 CABLE TV /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************4************************************ R RADIOCALL CORPORATION PAGING SERV/JUNE 88 R RADIOCALL CORPORATION PAGING SERV/JUNE 88 00102 001-400-2101-4307 00139 45648 06/01/88 POLICE 00102 001-400-2401-4201 • 00178 45648 06/01/88 ANIMAL CONTROL $98. 00 $70.00 /RADIO MAINTENANCE 06329 26698 $0.00 06/09/88 4110/4111 04868 $0.00 $10.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $80.00 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO MISC CHCS/MAY 88 00173 05/31/88 00173 05/31/88 00173 05/31/88 001-400-2101-4305 00719 POLICE 001-400-2101-4306 00529 POLICE 001-400-4201-4305 00302 BUILDING 00173 -- 001-400-4202-4305 001-400-4202-4305 00288 05/31/88 PUB WKS ADMIN 00173 001-400-4202-4305 00289 05/31/88 PUB WKS ADMIN $63.96 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $154.42 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $39.66 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $33.23 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $21.74 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 419016 06103 $98.00 26699 06/09/88 26700 06/09/88 45648 00026 26701 $0.00 06/09/88 45648 00026 26701 $0.00 06/09/88 00536 26702 $0.00 06/09/88 00536 26702 $0.00 06/09/88 00536 26702 $0.00 06/09/88 00536 26702 $0.00 06/09/88 00536 26702 $0.00 06/09/88 GO CO 4 • • • co • • • • 1 • • ClO 0 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 40 40 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST1 • PAGE 0022 FOR 06/14/88 DATE 06/09/88 • • VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 40 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO 00173 110-400-3302-4305 00419 $42.64 MISC CHCS/MAY 88 05/31/88 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL ***************,*.*► *.****** u *twit.**************** $355.65 00536 26702 $0.00 06/09/88 R RIVIERA FINANCE 02178 145-400-3407-4201 00024 $7,601.19 1209-8 06013 26703 TRANS IMP PLAN STUDY 209-8 05/02/88 COMTR BUS STUDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $7,601.19 R ROGER WOODS 02278 001-400-6101-4309 00509 $388.72 1005 05785 26704 SIGN FOR PARK/PROSPECT 1005 06/03/88 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $388.72 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************************;**************** *388.72 R SCOTSMAN 02285 001-400-2101-4201 00262 $1.010.25 43547 05674 26705 RENTAL/BOOKING TRAILER 43547 05/03/88 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.010.25 R SELF INSURERS SERVICE, INC. 00824 705-400-1217-4201 ' 00028 $234.50 8094 05836 26706 1099/599 SERVICES 8094 05/09/88 WORKERS COMP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************+F******************** $234.50 R SELF -INSURERS SERVICE 01739 705-400-1209-4201 00047 $4,380.00 8161 00041 26707 PMT DUE/APR-JUN 88 8161 05/11/88 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/09/88 - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *4,380.00 R SENTINEL SIGNAL SYSTEMS 01025 001-400-4204-4321 00357 $200.00 05782 26708 FIRE ALARM LEASE 05/15/88 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT $300.00 06/09/88 r- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $200.00 R MARTHA*SHAW 02292 110-300-0000-3302 21365 $45.00 415894 06231 26709 CITE PMT REFUND 15894 06/02/88 $0.00 06/09/88 /COURT FINES/PARKING • • 1 1 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC* PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************** c+r****nw************ ************ ************ R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R SINCLAIR PAINT CO.-- MISC CHCS/MAY 88 01399 001-400-3103-4309 -00648 05/31/88 ST MAINTENANCE 01399 001-400-4204-4309 00949 05/31/88 BLDG MAINT 01399 001-400-6101-4309 00505 05/31/88 PARKS PAGE 0023 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $45.00 $73.61 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $288.97 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $28.97 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************+r•***********+t************** $391.55 R SMARDAN SUPPLY CO. PLUMBING SUPP/PIER 02284 001-400-6101-4009 45353 05/19/88 PARKS 00508 $76.42 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY MISC CHCS/MAY 88 00114 001-400-2101-4306 05/31/88 POLICE $76.42 00526 $146.76 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * R R R SO BAY REO PUB COMM AUTHORITY JULY CONTRACT PMT 1830 SO BAY REG PUB COMM AUTHORITY PHONE SERV/HB EQUIP 1816 SO BAY REO PUB COMM AUTHORITY JULY CONTRACT PMT 1830 VENDOR TOTAL 00112 001•-400-2101-4251 00204 06/01/88 POLICE 00112 001-400-2101-4304 00252 05/31/88 POLICE . 00112 001-400-2201-4251 00031 06/01/88 FIRE $146.76 $23,440.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $557.65 /TELEPHONE *5.860.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $29,857.65 R SO BAY TRNG OFCRS DEPOSITORY - ANNUAL FEES/FY 88 813 00614 001-400-2201-4316 05/26/88 FIRE 00127 $300.00 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R 80 CAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORP. STREET LITE LAMPS 43629 $300.00 00538 26710 $0.00 06/09/88 00538 26710 $0.00 06/09/88 00538 26710 $0.00 06/09/88 245353 05800 26711 $0.00 06/09/88 00539 26712 $0.00 06/09/88 1830 06239 26713 $0.00 06/09/88 1816 06341 26713 $0.00 06/09/88 1830 06239 26713 $0.00 06/09/88 813 05336 26714 *0.00 06/09/88 02191 105-400-8201-4201 00036 $1.584.72 • 43629 05768 05/17/88 CIP 85-201 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *1.586.85 26715 06/09/88 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ************** ********* *****wa**a ►********************* ********** R SOURISSEAU SECURITY SYS. -INC.' BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION /1089 02075 _' -001-400-2101-4201 05/23/88 POLICE PAGE 0024 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO It CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1.584.72 00263 $930.00 1091/1089 06307 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 $930.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************r* R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 'CITE SURCHARGE/MAY 88 00118 110-300-0000-3302 21368 $13.545.00 05/31/88 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT COURT BAIL/CITATIONS R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT COURT BAIL/CITATIONS 00400 110-300-0000-3302 21361 06/02/88 00400 110-300-0000-3302 21362 06/02/88 413. 545. 00 $788.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING $466.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL****w************************************+F******x******************* R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHCS/APR 88 R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHCS/APR 88 R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHCS/APR 88 R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHCS/APR 88 R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHCS/APR 88 R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHGS/APR 88 R SOUTH BAY OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHCS/APR 88 00162 04/30/88 00162 04/30/88 00162 04/30/88 00162 04/30/88 00162 04/30/88 00162 04/30/88 00162 04/30/88 001-400-1207-4305 .00125 BUS LICENSE 001.-400-2101-4305 00718 POLICE 001-400-2201-4305 00190 FIRE 001-400-4201-4305 00301 BUILDING '001-400-4202-4305 00287 PUB WKS ADMIN 110-400-3302-4305 00417 PARKING ENF 110-400-3302-4305 00418 PARKING ENF *1.254. 00 $9.67 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $10.44 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $9.55 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $99.40 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $8.52 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $25.49 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $34.89 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 26716 06/09/88 06226 26717 $0.00 06/09/88 06133 26718 $0.00 06/09/88 06134 26718 $0.00 06/09/88 00441 26719 $0.00 06/09/88 00441 26719 $0.00 06/09/88 00441 26719 $0.00 06/09/88 00441 26719 $0.00 06/09/88 00441 26719 $0.00 06/09/88 00441 26719 $0.00 06/09/88 00441 26719 $0.00 06/09/88 • • • • • • • FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND A ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE'INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL 4Hr************* 4HUHI************* r*****11w141****rir******4HH1********** R — SOUTH SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FUEL PERMIT FEE 23-88 PAGE 0025 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO N CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • $197.96 01688 001-400-8601-4201 00031 450.00 007274-23-88 05796 26720 04/04/88 CIP 86-601 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************************** ►************************* R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ADDL ST LITES/APR 88 $50.00 "00442 105-400-2601-4303 00134 41,635.17 05/01/88 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL**********4HHa*******4Hr***4HF*****4Ht*4HH►**4HHHHH********4HHr********** R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. GAS BILLINGS/MAY 88 41.635.17 00170 - • 001-400-4204-4303 00232 4690.59 05/31/88 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************4Ht********************4HHH►**********4H******* R SOUTHWEST REG OCC TRNG CENTER LOTUS 123 CLASS/CTY TRES R SOUTHWEST REG OCC TRNG CENTER LOTUS 123 CLASS/FINANCE R SOUTHWEST REG OCC TRNG CENTER LOTUS 123 CLASS/PERS. R SOUTHWEST REG OCC TRNG CENTER LOTUS 123 CLASS/D. P. R SOUTHWEST REG OCC TRNG CENTER LOTUS 123 CLASS/BUS LIC R SOUTHWEST REG OCC TRNG CENTER LOTUS 123 CLASS/FIRE R SOUTHWEST REG OCC TRNG CENTER LOTUS 123 CLASS/PLANNG R SOUTHWEST REG OCC TRNG CENTER LOTUS 123 CLASS/PUB WKS 02295 001-400-1141-4316 00026 06/07/88 CITY TREASURER 02295 001-400-1202-4316 00197 06/07/88 FINANCE ADMIN 02295 001-400-1203-4316 00129 06/07/88 PERSONNEL 02295 001-400-1206-4316 00056 06/07/88 DATA PROCESSING 02295 001-400-1207-4316 00019 06/07/88 BUS•LICENSE 02295 001-400-2201-4316 00126 06/07/88 FIRE 02295 -- 001-400-4101-4316 00103 06/07/88 PLANNING 02295 001-400-4202-4316 00100 06/07/88 PUB WKS ADMIN $690.59 $85.00 /TRAINING $255.00 /TRAINING $85.00 /TRAINING 485. 00 /TRAINING $170.00 /TRAINING $85.00 /TRAINING $85.00 /TRAINING $170.00 /TRAINING 00013 26721 40.00 06/09/88 06237 26722 40.00 06/09/88 06234 26723 40.00 06/09/88 06234 26723 40.00 06/09/88 06234 26723 40.00 06/09/88 06234 26723 40.00 06/09/88 4 Cie • 06234 26723 40.00 06/09/88 I • 06234 26723 40.00 06/09/88 06234 26723 40.00 06/09/88 06234 26723 40.00 06/09/88 r • • • 1 1 • • titt VI FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST _ FOR 06/14/88 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL **********************aa** ********* **wH ****** ***************** R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO -- MON SERV/MAY 88 R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO CLEAN DOWNTOWN SIDEWALKS 2217 R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO MON SERV/MAY 88 R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO MON SERV/MAY 88 00115 -"-001-400-3103-4201 00163 05/31/88 ST MAINTENANCE 00115 001-400-3103-4201 00164 05/16/88 ST MAINTENANCE 00115 '001-400-6101-4201 00110 05/31/88 PARKS 00115 110-400-3301-4201 00163 05/31/88 VEH PKG DIST PAGE 0026 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO Si CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 41.020.00 *1.617.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00029 26724 $0.00 06/09/88 $3.615.46 2217 05745 26724 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/09/88 $1.233.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $2.067.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $8.533.46 R SPIDELL TROPHIE NAMEPLATES 01238 001-400-4601-4308 00118 $35.15 9902 05/31/88 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************.******************* $35.15 R STATE OF CALIFORNIA FINGERPRINT SERV/APR 88 57342 00364 001-400-2101-4251 00203 $38.00 05/19/88 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT ***. VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $38.00 R STUART CONSTRUCTION CO. 02276 001-400-8606-4201 00016 $37.385.49 POLICE REMODEL SERV/MAY 6574 06/01/88 CIP 87-606 /CONTRACT SERVICE PRIVATE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $37.385.49 R SUPERIOR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT MISC CHCS/MAY 88 00425 001-400-2201-4309 05/31/88 FIRE 00445 $21.00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL*********a**************.s******,a,************************************ $21.00 R TENNANT COMPANY STREET SWEEPER PARTS 00307 . 001-400-3103-4311 00354 $1.793.88 05/19/88 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00029 26724 $0.00 06/09/88 00029 26724 $0.00 06/09/88 9902 04862 26725 $0.00 06/09/88 857342 00023 26726 $0.00 06/09/88 6574 06424 26727 $0.00 06/09/88 00544 26728 $0.00 06/09/88 05775 26729 $1.793.02 06/09/88 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0027 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************a*t***a**************************************** •1.793.88 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY- MISC CHGS/MAY 88 00124 001-400-6101-4309 05/31/88 PARKS 00504 $202.02 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $202.02 R TOPAZ AUTO LEASING •CITE PMT REFUND 02256 110-300-0000-3302 83341 06/02/88 21363 $28.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $28.00 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHGS/MAY 88 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R T. ...ANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHCS/MAY 88 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHCS/MAY 88 00123 001-400-2201-4309 00446 05/31/88 FIRE 00123 001-400-4204-4309 00950 05/31/88 BLDG MAINT 00123 001-400-6101-4309 00506 05/31/88 PARKS 00123 05/31/88 00123 05/31/88 00123 115-400-3104-4309 00550 05/31/88 TRAFFIC'SAFETY 105-400-2601-4309 ' 00344 STREET LIGHTING 110-400-3302-4309 00414 PARKING ENF *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************************** R AURELIANO*UGOLINI DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 56855 • 02296 001-210-0000-2110 06/06/88 $21.86 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $598.17 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $35.47 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $334.55 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $34.08 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $7.67 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS **** $1.031.80 00546 26730 $0.00 06/09/88 683341 06229 26731 $0.00 06/09/88 00548 26732 $0.00 06/09/88 00548 26732 $0.00 06/09/88 00548 26732 $0.00 06/09/88 00548 26732 $0.00 06/09/88 00548 26732 $0.00 06/09/88 00548 26732 $0.00 06/09/88 02214 $500.00 56855 05936 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $500.00 R UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SERVICE SOFTWARE SUPP/TO JUN 30 99-00 01597 001-400-1206-4201 00386 $290.00 6299-00 06120 05/19/88 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 26733 06/09/88 26734 06/09/88 t,. V 6.� • • �I FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 fib • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • DEMAND LIST PAGE 0028 FOR 06/14/88 DATE 06/09/88 PAY VENDOR NAME VNO * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK N DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP II R UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SERVICE 01597 001-400-1206-4201 00387 4105.00 • ' 6281-00 06126 26734 O SOFTWARE SERV/CITES ' 81-00 05/16/88 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00 06/09/88 r •- *** ' VENDOR TOTAL ir+F aaaawx ►******ae a a **p***p*** p *********,*•**4395.00 R URBAN LAND INSTITUTE- 00870 001-400-4101-4316 00105 444.50 06007 26735 • PUBLICATIONS 05/23/88 PLANNING /TRAINING 40.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 444.50 f R VANIER GRAPHICS 01302 001-400-1206-4305 00301 4855.95 5651-11 06122 26736 COMPUTER PAPER 51-11 05/25/88 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 40.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4855.95 ft R VERNON PAVING COMPANY 00019 001-400-3103-4309 00647 4131.52 00549 26737 . MISC CHCS/MAY 88 05/31/88 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 40.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4131.52 R SALLY A. *WHITE 00140 001-400-4102-4201 .00154 4204.00 06010 26738 . SEC SERV/MAY 17 05/26/88 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4204.00 . R C. EVAN*WRIGHT 02299 001-210-0000-2110 02211 4100.00 47943 05937 26740 WORK GUAR REFUND 47943 06/06/88 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 40.00 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4100.00 R WRAY PRINTING 00132 001-400-2101-4305 00723 *105.43 2068 05667 26739 BOOKING APPROVAL FORMS 2068 05/26/88 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4105.43 06/09/88 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $105.43 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1206-4201 00382 *158.33 VARIOUS 00015 26741 MAINT CHCS/JUNE 88 RIOUS 06/02/88 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00 06/09/88 • • ti f FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:13:30 PAY *** VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT/JUN 88 52598 R XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT/JUN Be 52213 R XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT/JUN 88 52597 R XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT/JUN 88 R XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT/JUNE 88 52595 R XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT/JUN 8B 52596 R XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT/JUNE 88 52595 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 06/14/88 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00084 06/02/88 GEN APPROP 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00085 06/02/88 GEN APPROP 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00086 06/02/88 GEN APPROP 00135 - 001-400-2201-6900 00037 52594 06/02/88 FIRE 00135 001-400-2401-6900 00010 06/02/88 ANIMAL CONTROL 00135 001-400-4601-6900 00011 06/02/88 COMM RESOURCES 00135 110-400-3302-6900 00083 06/02/88 PARKING ENF $321.08 /LEASE PAYMENTS $943.72 /LEASE PAYMENTS $229.64 /LEASE PAYMENTS $47.62 /LEASE PAYMENTS $56.15 /LEASE PAYMENTS $181.72 /LEASE PAYMENTS PAGE 0029 DATE 06/09/88 INV/REF PO * CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 519352598 00049 26741 $0.00 06/09/88 519352213 00048 26741 $0.00 06/09/88 519352597 00050 26741 $0.00 06/09/88 519352594 00053 26741 $0.00 06/09/88 519352595 00051 26741 $0.00 06/09/88 519352596 00052 26741 $0.00 06/09/88 $114.00 519352595 00051 26741 /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 06/09/88 VENDOR TOTAL ************************************* **mow************************ • *2.052.26 R ZUMAR INDUSTRIES 01206 115-400-3104-4309 •00553 6915.90 STREET SIGNS & PARTS 5154 05/27/88 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *** PAY CODE TOTAL***************************************************************at** $915.90 $379.161.35 *** TOTAL WARRANTS***a***********************.Ir*******.M,***,I►****r********************* $429.147.79 5154 06403 $0.00 i HtRtBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS 0 THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGES -LT WARRANT REGISTER FOR _ ANO F NOS AR yAILABLE FOR PAYMENT. THEREOF* 26742 06/09/88 LAIMS COVERED OE OLUDVE OF y S MOURNS .. FINANCE ADNISTRATOQ DATE- fA'�I/4 1 BY Q INV • June 8, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of June 14, 1988 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Responsible Agent June 28, 1988 Consent Calendar Approval of outstanding employee program Personnel Director Recommendations on needs assess- ment study for City Hall space requirements Public Works Director Study of parking removal Westside of Pacific Coast Highway Public Works Director Draft of proposed Council measures presented for approval/changes in wording City Clerk Resolution re. stop signs. Also safe route to school signing and striping Public Works Director Public Hearings General Plan and Zone Change Area #7 Planning Director Municipal Matters Ballot issue on business license tax City Attorney July 12, 1988 Rotation of Mayor Mandatory committee appointments w/report re. reduction of rotation of Council liaison appointments City Clerk Council approval final wording of Council measures and questions for ballot City Clerk Appointment of two positions on Civil Service Commission City Clerk July 26, 1988 1 c Ordinances & Resolutions Resolutions calling election and requesting consolidation for all measures (Council and People's initiatives) Resolutions re. arguments, authors, and rebuttals City Clerk City Clerk ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Environmental data on removal of parking on Pacific Coast Hwy. Agreement for inspection & admin- istration for Traffic Signal Improvements CIP 85-138 Report on problems with campaign contribution ordinance. Recreational Vehicle ordinance Development of design standards and criteria by which to review projects for EIRS Acceptance of work and final estimate for replacement of sani- tary sewers Target Area I (J&J). Results of SCAG Santa Monica Bay Pollution Symposium Report on results of noise ordi- nance study Uniform Fire Code Fire Sprinkler Ordinance Ordinance amending provision against selling gasoline and alcohol at same location Public Works Director Public Works Director City Clerk General Services Director Planning Director Public Works Director Planning Director Public Safety Director Public Safety Director Public Safety Director City Attorney ***************************************************************** Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council June 7, 1988 City Council Meeting June 14, 1988 REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO APPLY FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT FUNDS FOR RECYCLING FEASIBILITY STUDY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to request funding for a city recycling feasibility study. BACKGROUND On April 27, 1988 the County Sanitation District approved the recommendation of District 5 and South Bay Cities Sanitation Dis- trict to make funds (up to $5,000) available to member cities for city recycling program feasibility studies. ANALYSIS As part of its efforts to solve the critical solid waste disposal dilemma, the County Sanitation District is encouraging the im- • plementation of recycling programs. The funds provided by the Sanitation Disti.ct have been approved for determining city specific items such as: 1) public interest 2) program goals 3) recovery and marketing potential 4) performing preliminary economic analysis. According to the Sanitation District, "This level of funding for city specific information, when coupled with the general, county- wide information presented in the District's report entitled 'Residential Source Separation Feasibility in Los Angeles' and the availability of the Sanitation District's staff to advise city staff or consultants, should be sufficient to allow member cities to make decisions on the implementation of residential recycling programs within their boundaries." The District report is available for review in the Building Department. Staff has had some preliminary discussion with the city con- tracted refuse company, Browning-Ferris Industries and has deter- mined the following: 1) Browning-Ferris Industries is capable of and willing to work with the City in any recycling efforts. le 2) Curbside collection of recyclables would require subsidizing by the city and/or increased refuse rates. 3) So far, few curbside recycling programs have been successful. (The City of Redondo Beach had one in place a few years ago and participation became so minimal it was discontinued). 4) One option for recycling is to establish recycling drop-off centers which would result in minimal or no cost to the city or residents. 5) Recycling centers can be established so that either the con- tributing individual is paid for recyclables; or a city - related cause" such as purchasing the railroad right-of-way or...(?) could be established. It should be noted a city-wide recycling program will require fundamental changes in residents' habits. The program will be successful only with their interest and cooperation. The mechanics of residential source separation: 1) Residents must keep selected materials, usually newspaper, metal and glass out of the mixed wastestream. 2) Residents must provide short-term storage for these materials. 3) Residents must either place these materials at the curb for collection or take them to a central recycling facility. In summary, while a full-fledged curbside recycling program may not be determined to be feasible for Hermosa Beach, staff believes it would be worthwhile to determine the level of public interest in recycling. There are several ways to go in the cre- ation of a recycling program. Since funds are available for this purpose the city investment in studying recycling feasibility would be relatively small. Concur: Concur: ,� 'Kevin B. Northcraft William Grove, Director City Manager Dept. of Bldg. & Safety Respectfully submitted, ice Silver, Admin. Aide D=t. of Bldg. & Safety May 31, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regualar Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 14, 1988 ACCEPTANCE OF WORK AS COMPLETE PIER GROUNDING REPAIRS CIP 85-203 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Accept as complete the work performed by Parker Diving Service for the Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier Grounding Repairs. 2. Authorize staff to release the Cashier's Check in the amount of $27,329, which was submitted by Parker Diving Service in lieu of the Labor and Materials and Faithful Performance Bonds for the subject, project. 3. Authorize staff to file a Notice of Completion for Parker Diving Service for CIP 85-203. Background: The purpose of CIP 85-203 (Pier Grounding Repairs) was to repair the lighting grounding system on the Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier. On February 9, 1988 City Council authorized the Mayor.to sign an agreement with Parker Diving Service for the Pier Grounding Repairs in an amount not to exceed $30,062 and authorized staff to issue change orders as necessary. Pending receipt of materials, a Notice to Proceed was issued on April 28, 1988 and construction began on May 11, 1988. Analysis: On March 3, 1988 Ronald Nisbet Associates (RNA) was contacted by staff to provide inspection and underwater diving services for the installation of the grounding system by Parker Diving Service. This installation is complete to the satisfaction of both staff and RNA. The inspection report (complete with photographs) prepared by RNA is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. The contract allowed for 30 calendar days for the contractor to complete construction. The project was completed in accordance with plans and specifications within 13 calendar days on May 23, 1988. Pending Council authorization, as required by the California Code of Civil Procedure, staff will file a Notice of Completion with the Los Angeles County Recorder's Office within 10 days of Council acceptance of work as complete. The 10% retention payment will be released 45 days after filing this notice. 1 11? Fiscal Impact: CIP 85-203 FY 87-88 Contract Budgeted Amount Final Contract Total Savings Amount to City Ronald Nisbet Associates, Design -0- $ 1,550 < 1,550> Parker Diving Service $27,329 27,329 -0- Ronald Nisbet Ass., Inspection 2,200 1,330 870 Contingency 2,733 -0- 2,733 TOTAL: $32,262 $30,209 $ 2,053 Funding source: Lighting Fund The project was completed within budget. Alternatives: Another alternative available to Council and considered by staff is: 1. Do not accept work as complete. Respectfully submitted, 46riA 411, utf5ky..- Deborah M. Murphy Concur: Anthony Antich Assistant Engineer Director of P bl c Works Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager DMM/umv 2 Noted for Fiscal Impact: ea•ca.d) Viki Cope and Finance Administrator June 6, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 14, 1988 TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS, AWARD OF AGREEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND INSPECTION/ADMINISTRTION, CIP 85-138 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council : 1. authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement for the construction of the Traffic Signal Improvements (CIP 85-138) with Steiny & Company, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $157,190. 2. authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Mohle, Grover & Associates (MGA) for Inspection and Administration Services for CIP 85-138 for a cost not to exceed $17,600. 3. authorize staff to issue construction change orders and addenda as necessary within budget limitations. Background: CIP 85-138 provides for street lighting improvements at the Pier/ Valley/Ardmore intersections and traffic signal improvements at the following locations: Hermosa Avenue at 2nd Street Hermosa Avenue at llth Street Hermosa Avenue at Pier Avenue Hermosa Avenue at 13th Street Aviation Blvd. at Prospect At the February 23, 1988 Council meeting City Council authorized staff to advertise for bids for CIP 85-138 and to issue addenda as necessary. In addition, this project will require inspection and administrative services currently beyond the staffing and expertise level available within the Department. Analysis: The analysis of this report is divided into three sections as follows: I. Construction Agreement II. Inspection/Administration Agreement III. Fiscal Impact I. CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Staff advertised for bids in local trade and general circulation publications. Requests for bids were sent to eleven contractors. On April 14, 1988, the bid due date, three bids were received, publicly opened and read aloud as follows: 1 1i Contractor Bid Steiny & Company, Inc. $142,900 E & R Electrical $163,473 Paul Gardener Corporation $165,971 Engineer's Estimate $157,525 All bids are on file in the Office of the City Clerk. Staff conducted a reference check and determined Steiny & Company, Inc. to be the lowest bid and most responsible bidder. Because this project is partially funded (86.2%) by Federal Aid Urban (FAU) funds, which are locally administered by Caltrans, staff solicited Caltrans' concurrence of contractor selection. On May 24, 1988 staff received notification from Caltrans (Exhibit I) indicating that "Caltrans concurs in the City's recommendation to award the contract for this FAU project to the lowest qualified bidder, Steiny & Company, Inc." II. INSPECTION/ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT On January 13, 1987 the City of Hermosa Beach'entered into an agreement with Mohle, Grover & Associates (MGA) for traffic signal design services for CIP 85-138. This agreement provided for the performance of construction inspection and administrative services, but indicated that a fee for such services is to be determined after the design services are complete. We are now ready to begin construction. MGA has submitted a proposal for the construction inspection and administration services, which is included in their proposed agreement. On April 25, 1988 staff received Caltrans' approval (Exhibit II) to award this consultant agreement for construction inspection and administration for this FAU project to Mohle, Grove & Associates. III. FISCAL IMPACT Proposed Contract Amounts: Contract 1. Steiny & Co., Inc. Bid + 10% Contingency Total Proposed Contract Amount 2. Mohle, Grover & Associates Fee + 10% Contingency Total Proposed Contract Fee 2 Amounts $142,900 14,290 $157,190 $ 16,000 1 600 $1777,600 ( ( This results in the following fiscal impact: CIP 85-138 Plans and Specifications (Design Services) Construction Inspection Contingency TOTAL Budgeted Actual Proposed Final To Date Expenditures Contract Amount To Date $ 30,800 $154,550 $ 15,000 $ 16,955 $217,305 $28,900 -0- -0- -0- 28,900 $30,800 $157,190 $ 17,600 $ 11,715 $217,305 Both proposed agreements are within the budgeted amount and are on file in the Office of the City Clerk. This project is funded as follows: 86.22% Federal Aid Urban funds; 13.7.8% State Gas tax. Please refer to Exhibit III for the Project Budget. The deadline for spending FAU funds for this project is January 1, 1989. Please refer to Exhibit IV for the Project Schedule. Pending Council authorization to award construction agreement, staff will submit paperwork for state reimbursement for design services provided by Mohle, Grover & Associates. Alternatives: Alternatives available to City Council and considered by staff are: 1. Drop the project. 2. Award to other than low bidder and/or recommended consultant: This would result in a resubmittal to and obtaining of approval by Caltrans, which could result in a project delay and possible forfeiture of FAU funds. Respectfully submitted, Abogi44-rut Deborah M. Murphy Assistant Engineer Concur, A•,•,ny Antich Director of Pubtlic Works DMM/Umv Attachments: Exhibit I: Letter from Caltrans re: Exhibit II: Letter from Caltrans re: Inspection Agreement Exhibit III: Project Budget Exhibit IV. Project Schedule 3 Concur, evin B. Northcraft City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator Construction Agreement Consultant Project • STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Exhibit I GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Gorsmor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7, 120 50. SPRING ST. LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 TDD (206304450620-3222 Mr. Anthony Antich Director of Public Works City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90252 Dear Mr. Anti.ch: This letter is our notification that Caltrans concurs in the City's recommendation to award the contract for this FAU project to the lowest qualified bidder, Steiny and Company, Inc. Attached aie two copies of the updated "Final Report, Utilization of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE)" form. The exact work the DBE is to be doing should be determined at the Pre - Construction Meeting. Be advised that in order to receive credit for furnishing the controllers, the DBE must buy them. To process reimbursement invoices, we will need the following: 1. One copy of the executed contract. 2. Date of Award: Please call in this information as soon as it is available. 3. Date the work is scheduled to start. 4. List of the contractor's material resources for our Research Department. Your pre -construction meeting is to be coordinated with the Construction Branch. All change orders must be reviewed by for approval and participation. All change orders shall be Mr. Hillel Amos District 7 Construction Branch 1425 South Channing Street Los Angeles, CA 90021 (213) 749-7246 May 19, 1988 07-LA-0-HmB MG -3041(270) Traffic signal Improvements at Various Locations Re Ir% .Au 4)241988 AEA? WoRkS EPI; Materials and Sincerely, C. Villanueva, Acting Chief Local Streets and Roads Branch Attachments cc: H. Amos, Construction Branch R. Trainor, Labor Compliance CBL/Laser Caltrans Caltrans sent to: STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Exhibit II GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7, P.O. BOX 2304, l05 ANGELES 90051 TDD (213) 620-3550 (213) 620-3222 Mr. Anthony Antich Director of Public Works City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley..Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90252 Dear Mr. Antich: RECEflf HrK 451988 Apri 1 22, 1388LIG WORKS DEPT. 07-LA-0-HmB MG -3041(270) Traffic Signal Improvements at Various Locations We have reviewed your Consultant Agreement for construction inspec- tion and management for this Federal Aid Urban (FAU) Project as submitted with your letter of March 17, 1988 and are hereby giving you our approval. If you have any questions, please'do not hesistate to call Jerry Royce at (213) 620-2360. Sincerely, C. Villanueva, Acting Chief Local Streets and Roads Branch JAR/cbl Exhibit III CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY86-87 THRU FY88-89 SECOND YEAR OF THREE YEAR CAPITAL, IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM • PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: ACCOUNT NUMBER: PROGRAM AREA: Traffic Signal Improvements CIP 85-138 150-401-8138-4201 Street & Safety Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: WORK PROPOSED: Project proposes traffic signal upgrade and/or installation at the following intersections. Hermosa Ave. at 22nd St., 11th St., 13th St., and Hermosa Avenue at Pier Ave; Aviation at Prospect Ave; and Pier Ave. at Valley/Ardmore. Design (by private traffic engineering consultant) approyal by City Council and Caltrans anticipated in Spring, 1987. Construction anticipated to begin late Summer, 1987. No City funds for construction will be expended on this project until approved by both City and State, and after staff is authorized to proceed by Council. • NOTE: This project formerly known as CIP #'s 85-131, 85-132, 85-133, 85-134, 85-136 and 85-138. BUDGET SCHEDULE Col 1 Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col 5 Col 6 Col 7 EXPENDED PROJECT ELEMENTS BUDGET THRU FY86-87 2/28/87 1. 1 I PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 1 1 PLANS. SPECS & ESTIMATES 1.13.45.5g1 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS EST'ED EST'ED THRU FY86-87 6/30/87 BALANCE FY87-88 FY88-89 1 1 1 1 TOTAL . PROJECT BUDGET 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 01_3QL8401 1 1' I. 3o 154,5501 • 41 1154,5501154,5501 11542.5501 1-.15.5541 91 .I -35 ,5591-35 ,4491 1-35..4441 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY TOTAL EXPENDITURE FUNDING SCHEDULE 1 d$�.6541 18,365 202,015 01.3%.40011/A...10411.6.2.5501 0 1,115 16,955 0 30,800 171.215 186.505 1QQ.3591 16,9E5, 217.305 FUND NO. FUNDING SOURCES ****************** 150 Grant Fund (1) 1174,1771 I I 1 I 115 1State Gas Tax (2) 27,8381 FUNDING DISTRIBUTION ************** TOTAL 26,419I 147.758I 160.805I 1187.2241 I 1 1 1 I 4,381 23.4 571 25,700 1 I 30.0811 ' TOTAL FUNDING (1) FAU (86.22%) (2) City Match (13.78%) 6 202,015 30,800 171,215 186.505 217.305 • CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE PROJECT NAME : Traffic Signal Improvements ACCOUNT NUMBER PIP 85-138 LEGEND TENTATIVE SCHEDULE : 111111111111111•1111111 ACTUAL SCHEDULE : immilmmommilm X : 100% COMPLETE I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TASKS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC n a I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1------1 1 Final deli g approval before advertising for construction '4 Prepare advertisement & set bid opening) I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 44 date ''4 I I I ! 1. - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . Advertising period M(issue addendums as necessary) Accept sealed bids & public bid opening) 1 I I 1........-1 I I I I 1 I • • h Review bids Award contract Sign contract (bonda,insurance & workers comp. cert.) Preconstruction meeting procedure I Issue "Notice to Proceed" Construction Period Monitor progress & maintain records Progress payment and change order procedure Acceptance of work as complete 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 .1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,„J 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 11s - 1 1 1 — - - I --1-..L.. j 1 '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ..I 1 Issusing and recording a "Notice of Completion" 1989 _ Retention Payment ( �� Project close ,out 1 • • •,� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _1• AGREEMENT MG -3041(270) THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , in the year one thousand nine hundred by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as the "City," Party of the First Part, and Party of the Second Part. hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor," WITNESSETH: That the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: ARTICLE I: For and in consideration of the payments and agreements hereinafter mentioned to be made and performed by said City, said Con- tractor agrees with said City to construct the work under the City's specification entitled "TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, FEDERAL PROJECT NO. MG -3041(270)," and to perform and com- plete in a good and workmanlike manner all the work pertaining thereto shown on the drawings and described in the specifications therefor, to furnish at his own proper cost and expense all tools, equipment, labor and materials necessary therefor, except such material and equipment as in said specifications are expressly stipulated to be furnished by said City, and to do everything required by this Agreement and the said Specifications and Drawings. ARTICLE II: For furnishing all said materials and labor, furnishing and removing all plant, temporary works or structures, tools and equipment and doing all the work contemplated and embraced in this Agreement, also for all loss and damage arising out of the nature of the work aforesaid, or from the action of the elements, or from any unforeseen difficulties which may arise from or be encountered in the prosecution of the work until its acceptance by said City, and for all risks of every descrip- tion connected with the work; also for all expenses incurred by or in consequence of the suspension or discontinuance of work, except such as in the said Specifications are expressly stipulated to be borne by said City, and for well and faithfully completing the work the whole thereof, in the manner shown and described in the said Drawings and Specifica- tions and in accordance with the requirements of the Engineer, said City will pay and said Contractor shall receive in full compensation therefor the prices named in the Bidding Sheets of the Proposal hereto attached. ARTICLE III: All work to be done under this contract shall be completed within ninety (90) working days, beginning on the date stipulated in the Notice to Proceed. ARTICLE IV: The City hereby promises and agrees with said Contractor, to employ and does hereby employ said Contractor to provide the mater- ials and to do the work according to the terms and conditions herein contained and referred to for the price aforesaid, and hereby contracts to pay the same, at the time, in the manner and upon the conditions set forth in said specifications; and the said parties for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, to hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants herein contained. $ aa``, F-1 Q� ARTICLE V: The general prevailing wage rates adopted by the City Council as indicated in the Notice Inviting Sealed Bids, and the minimum wage rates as predetermined by the Secretary of Labor appearing in the Special Provisions, are hereby specifically referred to and by this reference made a part of this contract. It is further expressly agreed by and between the parties hereto that should there be any conflict between the terms of this instrument and the bid or proposal of said Contractor, then this instrument shall control and nothing herein shall be considered as an acceptance of the said terms of said proposal conflicting herewith. ARTICLE VI: By my signature hereunder, as Contractor, I certify that I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workmen's compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract. ARTICLE VII: The improvement contemplated in the performance of this contract is a Federal -Aid improvement over which the State of California shall exercise general supervision. The State of California, therefore, shall have the right to assume full and direct control over this con- tract whenever the State of California, at its sole discretion, shall determine that its responsibility to the United States so requires. In such cases, the State Contract Act will govern. ARTICLE VIII: The Notice Inviting Bids, the Instructions to Bidders, the Proposal, the General Conditions, the Standard Specifications, the Special Provisions and the Drawings mentioned therein, and all addenda issued by the City with respect to the foregoing prior to the opening of bids, are hereby incorporated in and made part of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF: The parties hereto have caused this contract to be executed the day and year first above written. ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA Party of the First Part By: By: Mayor Contractor Party of the Second Part F-2 TIME AND MATERIALS CONSULTANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 1986, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"), and MOHLE, GROVER b ASSOCIATES, a California Corporation, located at 901 East Imperial Highway, Suite A, La Habra, California 90631 (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage CONSULTANT to render certain construction inspection and management in connection with Federal Aid Urban (FAU) Project Number MG -3041(270), Traffic Signal Improve- ments at: Hermosa Avenue at 2nd Street, llth Street, Pier Avenue and 13th Street; Aviation Boulevard at Prospect Avenue; and Valley/ Ardmore at Pier Avenue in the City of Hermosa Beach. WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified and agreeable to render aforesaid construction inspection and management; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual promises hereinafter expressed and intending legally to be bound hereby, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: Article 1. Employment of Contractor CITY hereby agrees to engage CONSULTANT to perform the construction inspection and management as hereinafter set forth. Article 2. Scope of Services CONSULTANT shall perform all work necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory to CITY the services set forth in Appendix A, attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof. Article 3. Personnel A. CONSULTANT represents that it employs, or will employ, at its own expense, personnel required in performing the service under this Agreement, and as set forth in Appendix A. 1 B. All of the services required hereunder will be performed by CONSULTANT, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and be authorized or permitted under State and local law to perform such services. Article 4. Time of Performance The services of CONSULTANT are to commence within fifteen (15) days after this Agreement has been approved by the State of California, Department of Transportation (hereinafter referred to as "CALTRANS") and when CITY has authorized work to start by the issuance of a Notice to Proceed. The construction inspection and management shall be completed no later than sixty (60) calendar days after CITY issues the Notice to Proceed. Article 5. Reports and Final Reports CONSULTANT shall submit a progress report once every month to CITY, outlining the progress of the project. Article 6. Limitation of Cost The basis of payment for the services provided under this agreement shall be time and material with a not -to -exceed fee. A. The CITY shall reimburse the CONSULTANT for actual costs incurred by the CONSULTANT in performance of the work in an amount not to exceed $16,000 as set forth in the CONSULTANT'S proposal in Appendix B, attached hereto and by reference incor- porated herein and made a part hereof. B. Billings will be based on the schedule of hourly rates as set forth in Appendix C, attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof. Article 7. Payment Once each month, CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY a certified invoice for costs incurred in the performance of this Agreement. Article 8. Records and Audits CONSULTANT shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to costs incurred under this Agreement to include the records supporting cost proposals used to enter into a contract with the CITY. All such records shall be maintained on a generally accepted accounting basis and shall be clearly identifiable. CONSULTANT shall make available to the representative of CITY, CALTRANS and FHWA, or their appointees, during normal business hours, all of such books and records, and the right to examine and audit the same, and to make transcripts therefrom as necesssary, and the CONSULTANT shall allow inspection of all work data, documents, proceedings and activities related to the Agreement for a period of four (4) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. 2 CONSULTANT shall maintain records to show actual time and allowable costs with respect to the Scope of Services set forth in Appendix A as required by CALTRANS and FHWA. CONSULTANT shall permit the authorized representatives of CITY, the U. S. Department of Transportation and Comptroller General of the United States to inspect and audit all data and records of CONSULTANT relating to his performance under the contract. Article 9. Compliance with Civil Rights Act During the performance of this contract, CONSULTANT agrees as follows: A. Equal Employment Opportunity In connection with the execution of this contract, CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, sex or national origin. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rate of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. B. Nondiscrimination Civil Rights Act of 1964 CONSULTANT, with regard to the work performed by it after award and prior to completion of the contract work, will comply with the regulations of the Department of Transportation relative to nondiscrimination in Federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation (49CFR21). Accordingly, the consultant shall comply with all aspects of Attachment I, "Federal Requirements for Federal Aid Projects.' C. Information and Reports CONSULTANT will provide all information and reports required by the CALTRANS or FHWA regulations, or orders and instructions issued pursuant thereto, and will permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by CITY, CALTRANS or by FHWA to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such regulations, orders and instructions. Where any information required of a CONSULTANT is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, CONSULTANT shall so certify to CITY, CALTRANS or FHWA as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. 3 D. Sanctions for Noncompliance In the event of the CONSULTANT'S noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, CITY shall impose such contract sanctions as CITY, CALTRANS or FHWA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: 1. Withholding of payments to CONSULTANT under the contract until CONSULTANT complies, and/or 2. Cancellation, termination or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part. Article 10. Covenant Against Contingent Fees CONSULTANT warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person to solicit or secure this contract and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, CITY, CALTRANS or FHWA shall have the right to annul this contract without liability or, in its discretion, to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee. Article 11. General Provisions Those provisions as set forth in the General Provisions attached hereto are by reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof. Article 12. Subcontracting CONSULTANT shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement without prior approval of CITY, CALTRANS and FHWA. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be signed by their proper corporate officers and have caused their proper corporate seal to be hereto affixed the day and year first above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH a Municipal Corporation BY: ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK 5 BY: PRESIDENT MOHLE, GROVER & ASSOCIATES CERTIFICATION OF CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am the Director of Public Works of the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH and that the consulting firm of MOHLE, GROVER b ASSOCIATES or its representative has not been required, directly as an express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this Agreement, to: (a) employ or retain, or agree to employ or retain, any firm or person; or (b) pay, or agree to pay, to any firm, person or organization, any fee, contribution, donation or consideration of any kind; except as hereby expressly stated, (if any): None I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished the State Department of Transportation, in connection with this Agreement involving participation of Federal -aid Urban highway funds, and is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (Date) Director of Public Works 6 CERTIFICATION OF CONSULTANT I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am the President and duly authorized representative of the firm of MOHLE, GROVER & ASSOCIATES, whose address is 901 East Imperial Highway, Suite A, La Habra, California 90631, and that neither I nor the above firm I here represent has: (a) employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee or other consideration, any firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above consultant) to solicit or secure this Agreement: (b) agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or retain the services of any firm or person in connection with carrying out the Agreement; or (c) paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above consultant) any fee, contribution, donation or consideration of any kind for, or in connection with, procuring or carrying out the Agreement; except as here expressly stated (if any): None I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished to the State Department of Transportation in connection with this Agreement involving participation of Federal -aid Urban highway funds, and is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil. MOHLE, GROVER & ASSOCIATES (Date) R. Henry Mohle President 7 GENERAL PROVISIONS The following general provision clauses are incorporated herein and made a part of this Agreement: 1. Changes in Scope or Complexity of Work 2. Specifications 3. Termination for Convenience of City 4. Termination of Agreement for Cause 5. Interests of Members of City and Others 6. Interest of Consultant 7. Officials Not to Benefit 8. Subletting or Assignment 9. Publications 10. Copyrights 11. Convict Labor 12. Insurance and Mutual Assistance 13. Jurisdiction 14. Successors and Assigns 15. Ownership of Documents 16. Extension of Time for Delay 17. Responsibility for Claims and Liability 18. Arbitration of Disputes 19. Cost Principles 20. Patent Rights 21. Endorsement on Plans, Etc. 22. U. S. Government Code Section 7550 23. Subsurface Investigations 24. Design Standards 25. Obligations of Local Agency to Consultant GP -1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Clause 1. Changes in Scope or Complexity of Work No payment for extra services caused by a change in scope or complexity of work shall be made, unless and until such extra services and a price therefor have been authorized in writing and approved by CITY, CALTRANS and FHWA as a supplemental agreement. The supplemental agreement shall set forth the changes of work, extensions of time for preparation and adjustment �f the fee to be paid by CITY to CONSULTANT. No claim for said additional work shall be made unless specifically authorized in writing by CITY. All controversies arising out of the work which cannot be settled by mutual agreement shall be resolved as provided in the July 1984 Standard Specifications of the State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for the settlement of such disputes. Clause 2. Specifications All specifications, manuals, standards, etc., either attached to this Agreement or incorporated herein by reference, are deemed to be the issue in effect as of the date of this Agreement and are binding as to the performance of the work specified in this Agreement unless they are changed by written amendment and this Agreement modified in writing to incorporate such changes. Any changes are subject to CALTRANS and FHWA approval. Clause 3. Termination for Convenience of City CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving written notice to CONSULTANT of such termination and specifying the effec- tive date thereof, at least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination. In the event, all finished or unfinished documents and other materials shall, at the option of CITY, become its .property. If this Agreement is terminated by CITY as provided herein, CONSULTANT will be paid an amount which bears the same ratio to the total compensation as the services actually performed bear to the total services of the CONSULTANT covered by this Agreement, less payments of compensation previously made. The value of the work performed should be the costs eligible for billing. The ratio completed should be based on the total estimated cost. Clause 4. Termination of Agreement for Cause A. CITY may, subject to the provisions of paragraph "C" of this Clause 4, by written notice to CONSULTANT, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement in any of the following circumstances: 1. If CONSULTANT fails to perform the services called for by this Agreement within the time(s) specified herein or any extension thereof; or 2. If CONSULTANT fails to perform the services called for by this Agreement or so fails to make progress as to endanger GP -2 performance of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, and in either of these two circumstances does not correct such failure within a period of ten (10) days (or such longer period as CITY may authorize in writing) after receipt of notice from CITY specifying such failure. 8. In the event CITY terminates this Agreement in whole or in part as provided in paragraph "A" of this Clause 4, CITY may pro- cure, upon such terms and such manner as he may determine appro- priate, services similar to those terminated and CONSULTANT shall be liable to CITY for any excess costs for such similar services, provided that the CONSULTANT shall continue the performance of this Agreement to the extent not terminated under the provisions of this Clause 4. C. Except with respect to defaults of subcontractors, the CONSULTANT shall not be liable for any excess costs if the failure to perform this Agreement arises out of causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of CONSULTANT. Such causes may include, but are not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, acts of the Government in either its sovereign or contractural capacity, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes and unusually severe weather; but in every case, the failure to perform must be beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of CONSULTANT. D. If this Agreement is terminated as provided in paragraph "A" of this Clause 4, CITY may require CONSULTANT to provide all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, services, drawings, maps, models, photographs, reports, etc. prepared by CONSULTANT. Upon termination as provided in paragraph "A" of this Clause 4, CONSULTANT shall be paid the value of the work performed, less payments of compensation previously made, which shall be the allow- able costs. E. If, after notice of termination of this Agreement under the provisions of this Clause 4, it is determined for any reason that CONSULTANT was not in default under the provisions of this Clause 4, or that the default was excusable under the provisions of the Clause 4, then the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the notice of termination has been issued pursuant to Clause 3. Clause. 5. Interest of Members of City and Others No officer, member or employee of CITY, and no member of its governing body nor other public official of the governing body of the locality or localities in which the work pursuant to this Agree- ment.is being carried out, who exercises any functions or responsi- bilities in the review or approval of the undertaking or carrying out of the aforesaid work shall: A. Participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which affects his personal interest or the interest of any GP -3 corporation, partnership or association in which he has, directly or indirectly, any interest, or B. Have any interest, directly or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof during his tenure or for one year thereafter. Clause 6. Interest of Consultant CONSULTANT hereby covenants that he has, at the time of the execution of this Agreement, no interest, and that he shall not acquire any interest in the future, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services required to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. CONSULTANT further covenants that in the performance of this work no person having any such interest shall be employed. Clause 7. Officials Not to Benefit No member of or delegate to the Congress of the United States of America nor any Resident Commissioner shall be admitted to any share or part hereof or to any benefits to arise herefrom. Clause 8. Subletting or Assignment Neither of the parties hereto shall assign, sublet or transfer his interest in this Agreement or any portion thereof. Clause 9. Publications It is agreed that either or both of the parties hereto may publish at any time, subject to the terms of this Agreement, the results of the work conducted hereunder, provided credit is given to the individuals and organizations who conducted and sponsored the work. A copy of each manuscript to be submitted for publication by either of the parties hereto shall be furnished to the other party prior to such submission for publication and five (5) copies or reprints shall be furnished to the other party subsequent to publication. Articles or works reporting on the subject work hereunder or on portions thereof which are published or are caused to be published by CONSULTANT shall contain in the foreword, preface or footnote a statement to the effect that publication of the article or work does not necessarily indicate acceptance by CITY of the findings, conclu- sions or recommendations either inferred or specifically expressed therein. Clause 10. Copyrights No reports, maps or other documents produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be the subject of an application for copyright by or on behalf of CONSULTANT. GP -4 Clause 11. Convict Labor In connection with the performance of work under this Agreement, CONSULTANT agrees not to employ any person undergoing sentence of imprisonment at hard labor. Clause 12. Insurance and Mutual Assistance Each of the parties hereto shall carry insurance to protect him from claims under workers' compensation acts, from claims or damages caused by bodily injury including death, to employees and the public and from claims for property damage. If any claim related to the performance hereunder be asserted against either party hereto, the party claimed against shall receive all reasonable assistance from the other. Clause 13. Jurisdiction This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the statutes and laws of the Federal Government and any State and local government having jurisdiction in the premises. Clause 14. Successors and Assigns Each of the parties hereby binds himself, his partners, successors, assigns and/or legal representatives to this Agreement, in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. Clause 15. Ownership of Documents The CITY shall have unencumbered rights and title data general under this contract to include, but not be limited to, original documents, methodological explanations, computer programs, drawings, designs, reports, etc. Clause 16. Extension of Time for Delay A. If the work is delayed at any time by reason of a suspension ordered by the CITY or because of any other act of the CITY, or because of neglect by the CITY without contributory fault or neglect on the part of the CONSULTANT, or if the work should be delayed at any time by reason of strikes, acts of God, the public enemy, acts of the CITY, fire, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, freight embargoes, abnormal force, violence of the elements or for any other unforeseeable cause beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the CONSULTANT, or for any other reason which in the opinion of the CITY is proper justification for such delay, then the CONSULTANT shall be entitled to an extension of time equivalent to the time actually lost by such delay. B. The CONSULTANT shall file a written request with the CITY for extension of time within ten (10) days following the beginning of such delay, and failure to do so shall constitute a waiver thereof; provided, that in case of a continuing cause of delay, only GP -5 one claim will be necessary. The CITY shall decide whether and to what extent any extension of time shall be allowed. C. A request for an extension of time or the granting of an extension of time shall not constitute a basis for any claim against the CITY for additional compensation. The CONSULTANT shall be deemed to have waived any claim for additional compensation and does hereby so waive any such claim unless he shall at the time of filing a request for an extension of time, likewise file a claim for addi- tional compensation on account of such delay. Clause 17. Responsibility for Claims and Liability It is expressly understood that in the performance of the engineering services herein provided for, CONSULTANT shall be and is and independent engineer and is not an agent or employee of CITY. CONSULTANT has and shall retain the right to exercise full control and supervision of the services and full control over the employ- ment, direction, compensation and discharge of all persons assisting CONSULTANT in the performance of said engineering services here- under. CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible and save CITY harm- less for all matters relating to the payment of his employees, including compliance with social security, withholding and all other regulations governing such matter. CONSULTANT will at all times indemnify CITY, its officers and employees, and hold and save CITY, its officers and employees, harmless from and against any and all actions or causes of action, claims, demands, liabilities, losses, damages or expenses of whatsoever kind and nature, including attorney's fees which CITY may sustain or incur as a consequence of errors or omissions in CONSULTANT'S design of the project. Clause 18. Arbitration of Disputes The CONSULTANT shall, at all times, comply immediately with any and all demands made by the Director of Public Works. In the event of controversy between the Director of Public Works and the CONSUL- TANT, the CONSULTANT agrees to abide by the decision of the City Manager, whose decision shall be final as to all matters in dispute. Clause 19. Cost Principles This Agreement shall reference the Federal Procurement Regulations, Title 41, Subpart 1-15, Code of Federal Regulations as controlling for allowable elements of cost. Clause 20. Patent Rights All applicable patent rights provisions described in 41 CFR 1- 9.1 regarding rights to inventions shall be included in this Agreement. Clause 21. Endorsement on Plans, Etc. This Agreement shall require the CONSULTANT'S endorsement on all plans, specifications, estimates and engineering data furnished by the CONSULTANT. All endorsement shall be made by personnel licensed as Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. Clause 22. U. S. Government Code Section 7550 Any document or written report prepared for or under the direction of a State or local agency, which is prepared in whole or in part by nonemployees of such agency, shall contain the numbers and dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation of such document or written report; provided, however, that the total cost for work performed by nonemployees of the agency exceeds five thousand dollars ($5,000). The contract and subcontract numbers and dollar amounts shall be contained in a separate section of such document or written report. When multiple documents or written reports are the subject or product of the contract, the disclosure section may also contain a statement indicating that the total contract amount represents compensation for multiple documents or written reports. Clause 23. Subsurface Investigations CONSULTANT is responsible for making subsurface investigations relative to the traffic signal design. As a result of these invest- igations, CONSULTANT is to locate all the applicable utilities and verify them with the utility companies. Utilities are then to be indicated on the plans where underground work will be included with the specific project. Clause 24. Design Standards Consultant shall conform to the State of California, Department of Transportation Standard Plans and Specifications and General Signal Layout format. Clause 25. Obligations of Local Agency to Consultant All data applicable to the project and in the possession of the City shall be made available to the Consultant. This shall include, but is not limited to, the following: 1. Accident data 2. Existing plans and/or specifications 3. Traffic Counts 4. Format for plan sheet 5. Miscellaneous public record information GP -7 In addition, the City shall serve as a liaison between the Consultant and the Planning Commission, City Council and the media for purposes of scheduling workshops, meetings and public hearings. March 1, 1988 EXHIBIT A Ms. Deborah M. Murphy Assistant Engineer City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Subject: Proposal for Contract Administration FAU Project MG -3041(270) Dear Debbie: We sincerely appreciate the opportunity of submitting this proposal to provide the complete inspection and construction administration services for the subject Federal -Aid Urban project. The overall responsibility for the inspection and contract administration will be by the undersigned. Mr. Burton S. Burgess, registered civil engineer, will be the professional directly assigned to the project. Mr. Burgess will be the on-site MGA representative and will be responsible for all detailed inspections and contract administration items. Our proposal is to provide complete services so that the only work on the project required to be done by City staff will be to sign reimbursement requests and other documents as may be required to have City official signatures. We will be responsible for all details and documentation during the construction phase of the project. Our proposed duties will include, but not be limited to, the following: o Review construction bids and advise the City on award of the project. o Prepare letter to State recommending contract approval. o Preparation for and supervision of pre -construction meeting. o Preparation of the Notice to Proceed. Ms. Deborah M. Murphy March 1, 1988 Page 2 o Conduct of all required "at the scene" construction inspections. o Interview persons employed by the contractor and sub- contractors on-site. o Review of contractor's payroll. o Preparation and keeping of diaries and all documents required under the FAU procedures. o Keeping track of and communicating with contractor as to days remaining on contract. o Preparation of all contract change orders, if so required. o Preparation of monthly progress pay requests for payments to the contractor. o Preparation of reimbursement requests to the State for FAU funds. o Conduct of controller testing at the laboratory selected by MCA. o Attend informational meetings with City staff as required. o Prepare final report in accordance with Caltrans procedures. As you know, we have just completed the contract administration of a $4 million dollar full interchange on a State highway utilizing $1 million dollars of FAU funds in addition to City assessment district funds. Mr. Burgess was the resident engineer for this project and therefore has very current and extensive experience in all phases of construction including traffic signal work. It is proposed that the work for providing the detailed inspection and contract administration services be conducted on a time and material basis in accordance with the attached hourly rates with a not -to -exceed fee of $16,000. The not -to -exceed fee is approximately 10 percent of the City approved estimate of actual construction costs. If the contractor exceeds the contract time limit and is assessed liquidated damages, the not -to -exceed fee would possibly be exceeded due to the extraordinary length of commitment necessary on our part. Ms. Deborah M. Murphy March 1, 1988 Page 3 Please give me a call if you have any questions or need any amplification of this proposal. Respectfully submitted, MOHLE, GROVER & ASSOCIATES R. Henry Mohle President RHM:jh Attachment EXHIBIT B CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TIME AND MATERIALS COST ESTIMATE LABOR (Including Overhead) Principal 20 hours @ $90 $ 1,800 Resident Engineer 100 hours @ $70 7,000 Senior Draftsman 40 hours @ $50 2,000 Clerical 40 hours @ $35 1.400 12,200 MATERIALS Controller Laboratory Testing 3,500 Printing b Miscellaneous 300 3,800 TOTAL NOT -TO -EXCEED $16,000 • EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1988 Principal $90.00 Vice President $75.00 Transportation Engineer/Associate $70.00 Civil Engineer/Associate/Resident Engineer $70.00 Computer Analyst $55.00 Designer $55.00 Construction Inspector $55.00 Senior Draftsman $50.00 Assistant Engineer $50.00 Engineering Technician II $40.00 Engineering Technician I $35.00 Clerical $35.00 Traffic Enumerators $30.00 Computer Operator $25.00 Expert Witness - Principal $125.00 Vice President $100.00 Subconsultants will be billed at cost plus 10% Mileage Rate: $0.25 per mile June 8, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 14, 1988 RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE INFORMATIONAL REPORT REGARDING PERMITS FOR LIVE BANDS AND AMPLIFIED SOUND RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council receive and file this report. BACKGROUND: Each year there are numerous requests for a permit during the summer months, especially on holidays. Over the past few years, there have been permits issued by the Chief of Police/Director of Public Safety on several occassions. The purpose of this report is to inform Council that several applications have been received, and of the procedure that is followed before a permit is issued. ANALYSIS: There are procedures set forth in Article V, Sections 19i-14 through 19i-30, of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code which deal with Amplified Sound and the issuance of permits. The Article deals with requirements of the application, time limits for the application, and fees for the application and the permit. Section 191-18 deals specifically with approval of a permit, placing the authority with the Chief of Police/Director of Public Safety. This section sta- tes that the Chief/Director shall approve the permit, unless he finds that the issuance would violate one of the five(5) criteria set forth, see attached. If the permit is denied, the applicant is afforded an appeal to the City Council. Before a permit is issued, staff considers all of the five items listed, as well as checking to see if any problems or complaints have been received at the loca- tion for which the permit is being issued. If a permit is issued, several restrictions are set forth. The permit fee is collected and the permit is issued. A sample of a previous permit and a copy of section 19#-18 is attached for your review. Resfully ubitted, Steve S. 'i niewsk Director of Public Safety CONCUR: �y'f1 4 -6 - Kevin B. Northcraft,'City Manager li LIVE (AMPLIFIED) ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DATE: May 24, 1988 In accordance with Chapter 19i, Sections 19i-14 through 19#-22 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, has been granted approval by the Hermosa Beach Police Department to have live (amplified) entertainment at in Hermosa Beach, CA on May 31, 1988 from the hours of 3:OOPM to 7:OOPM subject to the following conditions: I 1. Music must stop at 7:OOPM. 2. The volume of sound shall be controlled so that it will not be unreasonably loud, disturbing, or a nuisance to persons living in nearby residences. 3. If there are any complaints concerning the volume of music, applicant will immediately turn it down to a reasonable level when instructed to do so by Police Officers. 4. Public intoxication and public drinking shall not be allowed. 5. If Police are required to respond to more than one(1) complaint regarding the volume of noise or more than two(2) total complaints; this permit shall become invalid immediately and will be cause for the entire party to be closed down by Police. 6. This permit shall be produced for inspection, on demand, by any Hermosa Beach Police Officer. conditions. Date: Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety Permit fee: $20.00 understand and agree to adhere to all listed § 1934-18 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE § 1934-20 (d) A general description of the sound amplifying equip- ment which is to be used; and (e) Whether the sound amplifying equipment will be used for commercial or noncommercial purposes. (Ord. No. N. S. 398, § 1, 1-19-71) Sec. 19 %2 -18. Approval of License Review Board. The chief of police shall approve the application unless he finds that: (a) The conditions of the motor vehicle movement are such that, in the opinion of the chief of police, use of the equipment would constitute a detriment to traffic safe- ty; or (b) The conditions of pedestrian movement are such that, in the opinion of the chief of police, use of the equip- ment would constitute a detriment to traffic safety; or (c) The issuance of the permit would be otherwise detri- mental to the public health, safety or welfare; or (d) The issuance of the permit will substantially interfere with the peace and quiet of the neighborhood or the community; or (e) The applicant would violate the provisions of this Code or of any other law. (Ord. No. N. S. 398, § 1, 1-19-71; Ord. No. N. S. 480, § 2(B), 1-15-74) Sec. 191/2-19. Conditions of approval. The chief of police may impose such conditions on the operation to be conducted under the permit as he may deem necessary or proper. (Ord. No. N. S. 398, § 1, 1-19-71; Ord. No. N. S. 480, § 2(C), 1-15-74) Sec. 19 y2 -20. Appeals. Any person aggrieved by disapproval of an application may appeal to the city council within ten (10) calendar days from Supp. No. 6-74 274.34 June 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council June 14, 1988 RECOMMENDATION TO CONVERT THE CITY HALL TELEPHONE SYSTEM TO DIRECT -IN -DIALING (DID) Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the conversion of the City Hall telephone system to direct -in -dialing. Background: Shortly after City Manager Northcraft arrived, he asked us to look into the benefits of direct -in -dialing as opposed to all calls coming through the switchboard. Initially, we were skeptical because we assumed it would require a new telephone system. Much to our surprise, we learned that we could convert to this system, with our present equipment, by merely adding a couple of circuit boards. A representative of General Telephone Company met with the Executive Staff on Monday, June 6th, to provide information and answer any questions pertaining to this system. The staff is in agreement that this method is both cost effective and efficient. Analysis: What is DID? Direct -in -dialing allows callers to dial a seven digit number for a particular work group or employee without going through a switchboard. It saves the incoming caller time by not having to go through the attendant. Telephone directory listings guide the caller to the appropriate department or division in the event that they do not know who to call. There will be an assigned general information number for assistance, when all else fails. If this conversion is to be effected, it is necessary to submit our desired telephone directory listings by the end of June. The conversion would not be implemented until October in conjunction with the release of the 1988 telephone directory. The most evident benefit of DID is cost -savings. After an initial installation fee of approximately $10,000 (a one time charge) the monthly cost would be $530, or $6,360 annually. There are additional costs for installation of more trunk lines, if it is deemed necessary, but they are nominal. The annual cost of attending the switchboard is approximately $31,000, this includes salary and benefits. Overall savings $24,640 annually. The current switchboard operator will be assimilated into the general work force, in another capacity, through attrition etc. Although the final details are not complete, we can assure you that a long term dedicated employee will not be affected by this change. Jo�ffi Noon General Services Director Noted for Fiscal Imp ct : Concur: . !., r jj, �-.c�% Viki Copeland Kevin B. Northcraft Finance Administrator City*Manager CITY MANAGER COMMENT: Another positive impact will be that the public will be able to call departments directly, saving time in getting to the desired department or employee. However, this will require maintaining department telephone numbers rather than the one City Hall number we now have. The proposed direct dial system is working in many California cities, including Inglewood, Hawthorne, and Torrance. June 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 14, 1988 DONATIONS TO THE CITY Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign letters of appreciation to all individuals and or businesses making donations to the City. Background: A Hermosa Beach family has recently donated three park benches to the City to be installed on the Greenbelt between Gould Avenue and Pier Avenue. In May 1988 a letter from the family to Mayor Simpson was received by the Public Works Department indicating their desire to donate three benches to the City. Subsequently, the benches have been ordered and will be delivered to the City Yard. Installation will be done in-house. In September 1987 The same family donated monies to cover the installation of a drinking fountain at Pier Avenue on the north side of the greenbelt area. The Beach Cities Cycle located at 219 Pacific Coast Highway is donating two mountain bikes to the Hermosa Beach Police Department for use by the Department until September 1988. Beach Cities Cycle will also provide all maintenance and repairs. The individuals responsible for this donation are Jay Podgurski and Carl Pedersen. Analysis: It is the opinion of staff that the above residents and business owners receive recognition in the form of "Letters of Appreciation" signed by the Mayor. Respectfully submitted, Concur: Anthony Antich Director of Pu•lic Works 'Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 1 eves�ewski Public Safety Director i 4 June 8, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 14, 1988 RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN REVISED MONTH TO MONTH CONTRACT WITH RCC RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council authorize the City manager to sign the attached month to month agreement for services with RCC. BACKGROUND: At the regular City Council meeting of April 26, 1988, Council authorized the City Manager to sign a month to month agreement for dispatch services with RCC. That particular agreement did not contain a "hold harmless" clause because of an oversight during the drafting of the agreement. The City Attorney and the attorney for RCC worked together to draft an accep- table clause to be included in the agreement. The Board of Directors of RCC has approved the agreement and authorized the Director to sign. CONCUR: rpt-�fi� Kevin B. Northcra t, City Manager tful ly tted, Steve S. W 's iewski Director of Public Safety Enclosure #6 CONTRACT AGREEMENT June 8, 1988 1. The City of Hermosa Beach ("City") hereby requests and the South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority ("Authority") hereby agrees to provide public safety telecommunications service to City on a month-to-month basis during Fiscal Year 1988- 1989. Services to be provided are limited to: a. Twenty-four hour answering of all incoming calls for service received on 9- 1-1 telephone lines, City seven -digit emergency lines (376-9454, 376-9455, 376-9456, 372-2188, 372-2189), and alarm circuits. b. Twenty-four hour dispatching of all City Fire and Police calls for service, and alarm notifications. c. Maintenance of all presently serviced electronics equipment; equipment for City communications center use is specifically excluded. d. Complaint investigation service. 2. This agreement does not convey to City any duties, responsibilities or privileges of membership in Authority; City is contracting for service only. On and after July 1, 1988, City will have no membership or voting rights on any Authority Board or Committee. As a contracting agency, City will be welcome to attend any meeting. 3. As established by the Board of Directors, monthly contract costs are set as follows: July 1988: $29,300 August 1988: 28,300 September 1988: 24,250 October 1988: • 23,250 November 1988: 24,250 Contract service beyond November 30, 1988, assumes incremental computer system developmental costs, and is as follows: December 1988: $146,500 January through June 1989: $ 26,500 monthly 4. Invoices for monthly service will be furnished 30 days prior to the service month, and are due and payable fifteen days before the beginning of the service month. (July 1988 service invoice furnished June 1, 1988, payable June 15, 1988.) Payments received by Authority Treasurer from one to seven days late- will require a 5% penalty; more than seven days late incurs a 10% penalty. 5. Authority requires and City agrees to provide 45 -day written notice to Authority's Executive Director to end service agreement. Penalty for insufficient notice shall be as determined by Authority Board of Directors. Provision of service for less than one month will still incur the full monthly charge. 1 • 6. The City of Hermosa Beach shall indemnify and hold South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority, and its member agencies, harmless for any and all injuries or damages caused by the negligence of the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers or employees. The South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority arid its member agencies shall indemnify and hold harmless the City of Hermosa Beach for any negligence caused by the South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority, its member agencies, its officers or employees. Agreement entered into this day of , 1988 City Authority 2 .f May 17, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council June 14, 1988 APPROVAL OF LEASE AGREEMENT FOR RENTAL OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY AT 74 FOURTEENTH STREET Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council (1) approve the attached lease agreement for rental of the city owned property at 74 Fourteenth Street and (2) authorize the Mayor to sign said agreement. • Background: At your regularly scheduled meeting of June 10, 1986, the City Council directed the City Manager to complete an escrow to acquire for public parking purposes the vacant lot listed as 74 14th Street (see background material). The intended use was to incorporate the property into Lot "C" to create additional park- ing spaces, it is currently being used for this purpose. We have found however, that there is not a need for this additional parking on a year round basis. The only time it is needed is on busy weekends during the summer months consequently, the only additional revenue we receive is the percentage of gross revenue that is generated during these busy weekends. Consideration was given to striping and metering the lot but due to the dimensions of the property and the need for turn around space, we could only install eight spaces. Over the past two years, we have looked to leasing the property on a monthly basis to various businesses to perhaps alleviate some of their parking problems. A sampling of our effort is as follows: 1. In September of 1986, we contacted Social Vocational Services. They had eighteen vans that parked on Lot "C", overnight and on weekends. Their cost for park- ing was $540 a month. They were planning a move from Hermosa Beach and cited the parking expense to be their main reason. We offered the lot•as an alterna- tive since we determined they could be accomodated if they stack parked the vans. After consideration, they declined our offer. 2. In April of 1987, we contacted the owner of A & H Motors, an auto brokerage firm, at 200 Pier Avenue. We had heard that they were having a problem, with the City, re. their business license because of storing vehicles at their site. We felt that it may be an 1 10 alternative storage site for them. They appeared to be interested at the time however, despite follow up on our part, we got no where. 3. In August of 1987, we contacted the owner of the newly opened 7-11 store adjacent to our property. We thought that they might be interested in utilizing the lot for additional parking. They did not express any interest in our offer. Analysis: At this point in time, it seems advisable to enter into the proposed lease so that the City may realize a greater return on its investment, at least until the property is more marketable. The monthly rental fee is based on 20 cents per square ft. (2850 sq. ft. X .20 = $570.00). The City .is leasing its lots on First Street and First Place at a much lower rate however, the Fourteenth Street lot is much closer to the beach and in the commercial district and therefore more desirable. The annual revenue to the City will be $6,840. J Noon General Services Director cc: Kevin B. North raft City Manager Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator LEASE AGREEMENT THIS LEASE made and entered into this day of , 1988, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Lessor," and Ali Banihashemi, dba hereinafter referred to as "Lessee." RECITALS WHEREAS, Lessor is the owner of that certain real property located in the City of Hermosa Beach and described as: Lot 15, Block 14, Hermosa Beach Tract and commonly known as 74 14th Street, all of the foregoing hereinafter referred to simply as the "Leased Premises"; and WHEREAS, Lessee is desirous of leasing the Leased Premises for an initial six month tenancy for the purposes of utilizing the Leased Premises to conduct bicycle rentals and storage. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the Lessee and the Lessor as follows: 1. TERM. Lessor hereby leases to Lessee and Lessee leases from Lessor the Leased Premises for an initial period of six months commencing on the day of , 1988 and continuing until either party serves upon the other written notice in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 7 below, which notice will terminate the tenancy within thirty days after the date said notice is given. 2. RENTAL. Lessee shall pay to the Lessor as and for rental of the Leased Premises the sum of Five hundred and seventy dollars ($570.00) per month, payable on the first day of each month commencing On the day of , 1988 and continuing until the tenancy is terminated. 3. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS. Lessee agrees to comply with all the conditions of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) outlined in P.C. Resolution #88-43. Any breach of the conditions of the CUP shall be considered a breach of this agreement. 4. USE OF PREMISES. The use of the Leased Premises by Lessee shall be limited to bicycle rental and storage and for no other purposes. 5. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee promises to hold Lessor harmless from any claims for damages or otherwise and to protect Lessor, its officers and employees in any litigation and to satisfy any judgements granted against Lessor arising from'the use of the Leased Premises. 6. INSURANCE. Lessee shall cause to be obtained public liability and property damage insurance wherein Lessor, its officers and 2 employees are named as additional insureds for limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for personal injuries and Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) for property damage, provided further that such insurance shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney of the City of Hermosa Beach, and provided further that the insurer will agree to notify Lessor 30 days in advance prior to any cancellation of said insurance or the lapse thereof. 7. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pursuant to this Lease within three days after written notice from Lessor, or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this Lease within thirty days afternotice from Lessor, Lessor may immediately cause this Lease to be terminated and thereafter to take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 8. NOTICES. Any notices required to be made or given pursuant to the provisions of this Lease may be either personnaly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Lessor: Lessee: City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attention: City Clerk Ali Banihashemi 12531 Eucalyptus Avenue Apt. F Hawthorne, CA 90250 Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served 24 hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 9. ATTORNEYS' FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this Lease Agreement, that the prevailing party may, in the discretion of the court, be granted as an additional item of damages it attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Lease Agreement at the City of Hermosa Beach on the date first hereinabove set forth. APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH a Municipal Corporation City Attorney 4 Mayor City Clerk Lessee Lessee BACKGROUND MATER/Al a (o) Recommendation to acquire 75 - 14th Street for public parking purposes. Memorandum from City Manager Gregory T. Meyer dated June 5, 1986. Action: To direct the City Manager to complete an es- crow to acquire for public parking purposes the vacant lot listed as 75 - 14th Street. Motion Rosenberger, second Cioffi. So ordered. 1 Minutes 6-10-86 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council June 6, 1988 City Council Meeting of June 14, 1988 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC, DEPOSITS,. E'OH , HERMOSA BEACH Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of May 1988. Respectfully submitted, AfiA 1 Gary Bruts o City Treasurer NOTED: IFAA,z-a evin Northcra City Manager ld INSTITUTION TOTAL INVESTMENT REPORT - MAY 1988 DATE OF INVESTMENT. AIF BALANCE 3/31/88 Investment Investment Withdrawal Investment Balance 4/31/88 9ounty_Savings,Bank Investment Farmer. SaYifigs Investment $3,570,000.00 600,000.00 150,000.00 (600,000.00) 400,000.00 $4,120,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 99,000.00 California_Federel„$ & i, Investment First California Investment LQng Beach_S. &_L Investment Brookside S &.L Investment 1 $ 100,000.00 & ,L $ 99,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 99,000.00 5/4/88 5/10/88 5/27/88 12/23/87 3/23/88 12/28/87 1/6/88 1/6/88 1/13/88 DATE 4F_ MATURITY _ INTEREST 5/18/88 8.05% 1/6/89 8.375% 10/3/88 7.75% 6/31/88 8.15% 1/6/89 9.0% 1/6/89 8.5% 1/12/89 8.5% Cal_American Savings Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.75% Perpetual Savings Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.75% Pacific Savings Bank Investment $ 99,000.00 1/13/88 1/12/89 8.85% Beveriy_ Hiiis_S, & L Investment $ 99,000.00 1/15/88 1/17/89 9.15% iortb America,S,& L Investment $ 99,000.00 2/4/88 2/2/89 8.50% Founders S CI Investment $ 99,000.00 2/4/88 2/3/89 8.625% 4Ivstwood . $ & L Investment $ 99,000.00 2/5/88 2/3/89 8.50% Amerigan.Divers._Save, Bank Investment $ 99,000.00 2/9/88 2/8/89 8.25% eutterfield_S_& L Investment $ 99,000.00 2/18/88 2/22/89 8.20% Golden._Gate Bank Investment $ 99,000.00 2/24/88 2/23/89 8.0% Huntington S,&_1., Investment $ 99,000.00 2/25/88 2/24/89 7.85% Columbia $ 4_L Investment $ 99,000.00 3/3/88 2/27/89 7.4% Western Federal Investment $ 400,000.00 3/31/88 3/17/89 7.75% Ford, Motor_Credit.Co, Investment $ 500,000.00 5/19/88 5/20/93 9.10% FHLMC Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Investment Investment TOTAL BALANCE $ 248,733.64 $ 249,320.88 $?,3031054..52 Respectfully Submitted, ary Bruts h City Treasurer 3/26/87 5/26/87 3/1/17 8/2/16 8.0% 9.50% June 6, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council June 14, 1988 COMMUNITY CENTER TENNIS COURTS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended City Council receive and file this report. BACKGROUND This report will provide the City Council with a historical background on the operation of the tennis courts at the Community Center. The Community Center Courts were built in the 1980-81 fiscal year. Once completed the City initiated a.reservation/fee system which necessitated the hiring of part-time staff. The following is the actual accounting of that operation: Expenditures (include staff, utilities, maintenance staff, administration and miscellaneous). Revenues: Deficit $25,810 12,000 $13,810 Realizing the problems (financial and administrative), the City was experiencing with the operation, the alternative method of contracting out was pursued. An RFP was issued, interviews were conducted and a private contractor assumed the responsibility of the operation of the Community Center Tennis Courts on September 1, 1982. Monitoring that contract was an administrative nightmare. The Contractor did not abide by the contract, payments were not on time, and the revenue to the City was not as high as anticipated. Given the problems with the Contractor, the City chose not to renew the contract and City Council directed the Advisory Commission to review the entire operation and make recommendations as to the most cost efficient way to operate those courts. On March 11, 1986 the Commission recommended not contract out the operation of the Courts the operation that is now in effect. Presently, the courts are free to the public, lights for night playing. Also, three of the 1 that City Council and to proceed with with coin operated six courts at any ig one time can be "rented" by tennis instructors for private lessons. For this fiscal year(87-88) the revenue projection for the courts (including Kelly Court lights at Clark Stadium) is: Light Meter revenue and Rental fees: $11,500 Expenditures are estimated at: Utilities $1,600 Maintenance 3,600 Administration 1,200 Miscellaneous 2,000 Capital Purchases 1,000 $9,400 Expenditures: Revenue: Net Gain $9;400 11,500 $2,100 * This figure does not include the Capital Improvement Project just completed at Kelly Courts. SUMMARY In both previous methods of operation, the administration was a nightmare and obviously not cost effective. The present operation requires minimal monitoring and appears to be somewhat cost-effective and staff has not encountered many problems to date. Please note, the Kelly Court operation has never been altered. The Commission and Council both felt it was prudent to keep those courts for free play on a first come, first serve basis. Those courts do have meters for night playing. Noted:ff,7 • Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 2 Respectfully submitted, AiiE]a2) Alana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FROM: Hermosa Beach Planning Commission SUBJECT: Noise enforcement DATE: June 6, 1988 At the May 17, 1988 Planning Commission Meeting, Commissioner Pierce noted that the issue of noise enforcement has been going on for a year and half, and for various reasons enforcement has been delayed. The Planning Commission directedstaff to send a memorandum. to the City Council advising them of the Commissions view that noise enforcement is very important; further, that the Police Department should be provided with whatever is necessary to ensure that the noise measuring equipment will work properly. The Police Department has no new progress to report at this time. CITY MANAGER COMMENT: Staff has been awaiting the completion of the noise study to determine appropriate equipment and procedures defensible in court. On June 7, the person performing the study advised us it will be in our hands by June 10. 1 lb June 2, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council June 14, 1988 REQUEST FOR AUTHORISATION TO PURCHASE A HEWLETT PACKARD EAGLE DISC DRIVE Recommendation: Staff requests authorization to purchase a Hewlett Packard Eagle Disc Drive, for $12,302.88, as sole source, utilizing current budget data processing funds. Background:• Due to limited disk space and intermittent problems with a current drive, purchased in 1981, staff made a budget request in the 1988/89 budget for a new disc drive. City. Manager Northcraft recommended against the purchase, at this time, until we could provide further analysis on cost effectiveness and a review of options. Over the past eighteen (18) months, our system has been down due to problems with this disc drive on the following dates; 1/5/87 - system down all day 1/2/87 - system down all day 7/5/87 - system down 1/2 day 5/19/88 - system down all day Please see attached documentation re. verification. During budget workshop discussion, at our meeting with the City Council on May 31st, the City Council indicated that they were sensitive to this data processing need. Staff stated, at this time, that we felt there was adequate money in this year's budget to effect the purchase. Analysis: A review of our actual and projected expenditures, in the data processing budget for this fiscal year, indicates that there will be additional savings in our contract services account. Therefore, we can safely transfer the required amount to our equipment account. Our current disc drives provide 928 megabytes of storage. However with present utilization, there is only 2.5 megabytes (1.1 million sectors) of available storage to accomodate any future applications. Payroll alone will consume approximately 500,000 sectors (approximately one half) of the available space. In addition to payroll, we are scheduled to install a vehicle maintenance system and legislative history (indexing) during the 11 next fiscal year. It is doubtful that we can accomodate all of these new programs with our current disc space. In addition it is imperative that we preserve adequate space to reload the system in the event of a system failure. Installation of the new disc drive will increase our storage capacity by 33%. The Eagle disk drive is H. P.'s newest drive and they are the sole distributer. While there are several distributers of remarketed Hewlett Packard equipment, it is our understanding that only H. P. can sell new equipment. There are several reasons for choosing this particular drive. It is smaller than any other drive (we have a very congested computer room), the monthly maintenance cost is $50.00 as opposed to $197.00, which we are paying on our other drives and it requires less power and air conditioning. Finally, it has 571 megabytes of storage space and is the largest drive to accomodate the H.P. Series 3000. We have researched the option of purchasing a remarketed 400 meg. drive (which is the same as our other two drives). The lowest price we were able to obtain is $5,500. This includes shipping and a 30 day warranty on parts. However, it does not include installation. Hewlett Packard has to perform the installation if we wish to have continued maintenance on the equipment. The installation and inspection of the equipment is on a time and material basis. Time is $115 an hour,travel time at $120 an hour and replacement of any parts required to meet H. P. standards. We can purchase a remarketed drive from Hewlett Packard for approximately $6,880, including installation. Staff is recommending that we purchase the Eagle because (1) it is brand new and will have a 90 day warranty, (2) it has more disk space than the 404, (3) it takes less floor space, (4) requires less power and stress on the air conditioning and (5) the monthly maintenance is cheaper. General Services Director Concur: �7, Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 2 Noted for Fiscal Impact: 4kt-CI Viki Copeland Finance Administrator REPAIR DATA DETAIL PRODUCT SEARCH 2417E390500141 2202A18276 870731 7925A 050 2.0 PARTS DOLLAR TOTAL LABOR TOTAL CSO REPAIR TOTAL 88951 PM DUE PM'D CHANGED FILTERS .24175104300241 870122 79258 05P 1 07905-60046 4 07925-64254 1 07930-60226 1 07920-64255 5 07925-64253 3.0 PARTS DOLLAR TOTAL LABOR TOTAL CSO REPAIR TOTAL 88951 1),; -7 PS:LDVI:HAS BEEN LOGGING DRIVE FAULTS AND CUST IS CONCERNED REPLACED HEADS, VEL TRANSDUCER, VEL SHAFT*CUST REPLACED PACK do -urn Gni d . 2417S165000241 870625 7925A 05P PARTS DOLLAR TOTAL LABOR TOTAL CSO REPAIR TOTAL 0.0 88951 PS:INFO ONLY:10 POSS CORR ERRS ON H=5 OF LDEV 1 ON 6/24,ALSO DERR 15 ON LDEV 2;EL X2156 24175168300141 870705 7925A 05R 28179 SF650;7925 LDEV1; SUSPEC HD4. CALL CUST TO SCHEDULE TIME REPLACED HD 4;RAN SLEUTHSM;LOOKED AT 33'S LOOKED G000 • 4 REPAIR DATA DETAIL PRODUCT SEARCH 1 07925-64253 1.5 PARTS DOLLAR TOTAL LABOR TOTAL CSO REPAIR TOTAL 24175182200141 870804 7925A 05R PARTS DOLLAR TOTAL LABOR TOTAL CSO REPAIR TOTAL 0.0 88951 T DRIVE FAULT LOOKED AT LOG'S WILL MONITOR 24175190000141 870824 7925A 05P PARTS DOLLAR TOTAL LABOR TOTAL CSO REPAIR TOTAL 0.0 88951 INFO ONLY//LDEV 1 LOGGING DRV/CNTLR ERRORS ON PREDICTIVE. INFORMATION ONLY///POSS.DRV CNTRL PCA///JJ/WRC 408-982-2156 24175208700141 871005 7925A 05R 1 13037-69026 1 0180-2789 3.0 PARTS DOLLAR TOTAL LABOR TOTAL CSO REPAIR TOTAL 88951 FTR:01D:CE0:408-982.2156:W135380 INTERMITTENT LDEV1 NOT READY REPLACED POWER SUPPLY & CAP IN CONTROLLER 2417S210400141 871007 7925A 88951 REPAIR DATA DETAIL PRODUCT SEARCH 05P 1.0 PARTS DOLLAR TOTAL LABOR TOTAL CSO REPAIR TOTAL PS: LDV #1: HEAD 3 LOGGING EXCESSIVE ERRORS. FOR YOUR INFO. LOGGED ON SYSTEM RAN COLOSSUS NO ERRORS*NO ERRORS SINCE 10/9 24175365110141 880519 7925A 05R 1 13037-69026 1 0180-2789 2.5 PARTS DOLLAR TOTAL LABOR TOTAL CSO REPAIR TOTAL • 88951 DRIVE NOT READY*T FAULT INDICATOR ON 7925 REPLACED POWER SUPP & CAP IN 13037 TESTED OK 24175365110241 880519 7925A 05R PARTS DOLLAR TOTAL LABOR TOTAL CSO REPAIR TOTAL 2.0 81299 FTR:NCB:CE0:408-982-2156:W1208815 T FAULT INDICATOR ON 7925 REPLACED POWER SUPPLY AND CAPACITOR 2417T521200141 860710 7925A 054 1 3150-0316 1 3150-0340 1.5 PARTS DOLLAR TOTAL LABOR TOTAL CS0 REPAIR TOTAL 88951 D -u)-n 1 z &u"“/ PM DUE REPLACED BOTH FILTERS*PREFORMED FULL PM'S l REPAIR DATA DETAIL PRODUCT SEARCH 2417Y317510441 880121 7925A 05Q 1 3150-0340 1 3150-0316 0.5 PARTS DOLLAR TOTAL LABOR TOTAL CSO REPAIR TOTAL 88951 PM DUE PM'D DRIVE CHANGED FILTERS 12 CSO'S 21 PARTS 12 UNITS 17.0 HOURS PARTS DOLLAR TOTAL TOTAL CSO DOLLARS 0.65 PARTS PER UNIT 150.45 DOLLARS PER CSO -AVERAGE TOTAL STREP r May 31, 1988 City Council Meeting June 14, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-922 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2-12.16, ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL. Submitted for waiver of further reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 88-922.relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of May 24, 1988, this ordinance was reintroduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Concur: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson None None None evin B. North • aft, City Manager fR thleen Midstokke, City Clerk Y4 v 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE N0. 88- 922 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALLIFORNIA, AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2-2.16. ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL. WHEREAS, the City Couuncil has adopted rules to expedite the transactions of the business of the Council in an orderly fashion; and WHEREAS, Section 54954.3 of the California Government Code authorizes that the legislative body may adopt reasonable regulations limiting the total amount of time allocated for public testimony on particular issues and for each individual speaker; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 86-5001 on December 16, 1986, and has been attempting to follow the policy of allowing three (3) minutes per person for public testimony; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 2-2.16. Addressing the council. shall be amended as follows: (a) Manner of addressing council. Each person desiring to address the council shall step up to the microphone in front of the rail, shall be asked to state his name and address for the record, state the subject he wishes to discuss, state whom he is representing if he represents an organization or other persons, and unless further time is granted by majority vote of the council, shall limit his remarks to three (3) minutes. If the speaker feels he will need more time, he should so request before beginning his remarks. All remarks shall be addressed to the council as a whole and not any member thereof. No question shall be asked a councilmember or a member of the city staff without the permission of the presiding officer. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16" 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full •force .and operation from and after thirty days after its final passage and adoption. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, California. SECTION 4. The City Clerk; shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS ATTEST: City Clerk DAY OF , 1988 PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of Hermosa Beach. 2 4 May 31, 1988 City Council Meeting June 14, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-929 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE ARTICLE V. ENCROACHMENTS. Submitted for waiver of further reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 88-929 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of May 24, 1988, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None t � Ka leen Midstokke, City Clerk Concur: evin B. North aft, City Manager 2b 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27. 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88- 929 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, ' CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE ARTICLE V. ENCROACHMENTS. WHEREAS, the City Council is desireous of amending the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Article V, Sections 29-39 and 29-40 with reference specifically to Commercial Outdoor Dining Encroachment Permits. NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE.CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 29-39. Commercial Outdoor Dining., is amended to read as follows: A conditional use permit is required for use of public right-of-way for commercial outdoor dining subject to the following conditions: (a) Provides for and maintains an area for passage of pedestrian traffic; (b) Does not inconvenience pedestrian traffic; (c) Conforms with all applicable health codes and the Municipal Code. (d) applicant to pay all appropriate fees, including but not limited to rental fees, (e) applicant to maintain and keep in force at all times a policy of liability insurance, naming the City as an additional insured in the amount of $1,000,000, and (f) to pay restorative costs, if applicable, in an amount to be determined by the Director of Public Works, plus administrative costs. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27. 28 SECTION 2. Section 29-40. Mandatory conditions imposed on all encroachments. The third paragraph under .(c) in Section 29-40 titled Commercial outdoor dining encroachments shall be deleted. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and operation from and after thirty days after its final passage and adoption. SECTION 4. PUBLICATION. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be pub 'fished in the Easy Reader; a weekly newpaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 5. CERTIFICATION. The City Clerk shall certify to thepassage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of May, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS •RM: Y ATTORNE May 31, 1988 City Council Meeting June 14, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-930 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Area 9A from R-2 to R-1 and 9A from R-2 to R -2B with the exception of the areas currently zoned R-3). Submitted for waiver of further reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 88-930 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of May 24, 1988, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Concur: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Mayor Simpson Williams None None Kevin B. ort raft, City Manager Raleen Midstokke, City Clerk 9.diedttx.._) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88- 930 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on May 24, 1988 and made the following Findings: A. The State law requires consistency between the zoning and the General Plan; B. Rezoning the subject properties as indicated on the attached maps will result in consistency between the zoning and General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain amending the Zoning Map as shown on the attached maps and legally described as follows: 1. Rezone area 9A from R-2 to R-1, legally described as follows: - Lots 1-9 inclusive, 12-20 inclusive, 21-29 inclusive, 30-34 inclusive, east 3 feet portion of 35 and 36 of Tract 5209, Lots 1-8 inclusive, 10-45 inclusive of Hermosa Heights Tract. - Lots 1-9 inclusive, 18-37 inclusive of Hollowell Tract. - Lots 1-7 inclusive, 9-29 inclusive of the Dillon Tract. - Lots 1-3 inclusive of Parcel Map 5358. 2. Rezone area 9B from R-2 to R -2B except for areas currently zoned R-3: ▪ Lots 1-10 inclusive, 23-32 inclusive of Wilson and Lind's Tract. - Lots 2-6 inclusive, 1-19 inclusive of Glorietta Tract. • Lots 1, 2, 7, portion 10, 11 of Block 85 of 2nd Addition of Hermosa Beach Tract. ▪ Condominium Tract Maps #42019, 41234, 13703, 10651, 6031. - Lots 1-8 inclusive of Tract 7594. • Lots 40-45 inclusive of Tract 5209. - Lots 1-10 of Camino Real Tract. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 - Lots 1-8 inclusive of Garden View Tract. - Lots 1-8 inclusive of Hopkin Tract. - Lots 6, 8, 9 of Hurd's Ocean View Tract. 3. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a completed building permit package on file with the City prior to May 24, 1988. Said package must include a completed building permit application form, completed conceptual plans (plot plan, floor plans, elevation plans and similar plans) and a lot survey. Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a diligent manner and must be issued a building permit within six months of the effective date of this ordinance. 4. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. 5. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in tbe manner provided by law. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter tbe same in tbe book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of tbe City Council at wbicb the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: PROVED AS 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ccorzon9 MAP A AREA 9A Area Overview Rezone from Two Family Residential (R-2) to Single Family Residential (R-1) (numbers correspond to detail maps) V v n 4 SEVENTH 5 LD 1 5 LD '. x 2 LD I- H 2 ►. 4. 1 1. LD MASSEY AVE HOLLOWELL 3 LD GENTRY r I f} vE NvE /5. 4.1 'REYNOLDS MAP A AREA 9A Detail Map 1 Pi LN. 5 7• 6 0 5 4 ® Npq �.,�.. 41 31 ••.32`.•33`h34 +35'`366 `37`' %38 39'�40tk Q[1",.- 42 o,twN 43 t g UL d N **3 ® 111/' 2l `••2423 2 .7 ;• 9, 5 26~272812 9 t.t•t• 44 30 45 MASSEY 2 z5 'L bY dfiLlf 4O AVE. ate -+ �r I • RErNoLvs MAP A ARRA 9A Detail Map 2 LN. P ae Ow N vh Q ui 'I' ® N OA O O4 ON fi t•3 .®� ,j . '7 © IS • 36 IS K �C 35 3 PS fi 4 33 ,5 ,i0 YS • .3/MASSEY 0 r5 estra YS 5 rest 0 28 27 26 20 1 240 n 23 t3 22-* .AVE. • • 3 04m 21 ,ib ries Qm 16 HOLLOWELL $ I _ AVE. MAP A AREA 9A Detail Map 3 HOLLOWELL • 1 GENTRY `, • ASE SI 50 1 SO 130 jos ?S ?f 2 ,V -- iQ' i0 1 I 3 j� i 7 d5 Q 4 QQ 5 — zs O • n 70 — . r � • r� 0 .• I I„ 0 1 O i31 SO t so P® 1 $ . Q 32 •'_" i6i� $ 1 22 . IS o 23 . 0 24 .•. -- ' 0 25 0 26 ._. 3, 27 .- 026 28 , 29 . .. V , �1 33 v' 034 ,� �n 1 GENTRY `, • -0 rn -4 STH ST. MAP A ARBA 9A Detail Map 4 �o +h J�►'e,e.t' 00 O$35 y • 019 ie I8 CI 17 • • Q 18 f 1 1 �i 15 • 5 40 40 32 C) m 32 N r sr MAP A AREA 9A Detail Map 5 . . REY r OLAi L.N. ....la' «.. �. 2.o i vs '-e21.0 - -. " ., rr i o r- - o, .02 • 1 • O"— : yOLLOWB• L4. RYF rr 1 •r 11w •0 .rs - cte ti ® ® 4 • ,d e 1 • _ sfr OPP 1151 1 � 1 75OS��CT � V N . GE 1tly sr A «, 6 • C • L f) Oo 4 1 LD 4. N c, MAP B AREA 9B Area Overview Rezone from Two Family Residential (R-2) to Single Family Residential (R -2B) • (numbers correspond to detail maps) �cT 2 LD 3 LD r PINE 1ST. COJ ti V1 . HOPKINS AVE LO 5 OCEAN VIEW AVE 1' • ti. MAP B AREA 98 Detail Nap 1 0 • • 0 n 1 a A A • • ® r ® • A w PP ® l e • • ® I ® • • Q w • 0 • Qe • GP' • 0• Off •• 1 OF .. 1 •• • pe S 1 1 i W W b MAP B AREA 913_ Detail Map 2 1 O- • p= e 10:d. • 0 ! ._-?w • • = •ft 0 OP O Y .r Q • = a gt N a • N 0 • 1 AV • :Dai --- � -- Z 1331 -IS :::N O O• t i Opq ^,k 3 N�`7 • 1 w W PION • 1 • MAP 8 AREA- 9B Detail Map 3 P86/3PbECT f}- VENUE • l y ® -Ant- ,.. ® ✓� v - 14R ®4;.ti -w7-vol . 8 or 4" - o ' 'oc v I . Of :"Doer. 71 4.1 os I 1 1 1 OF sow / • . ;1 ® a . OW Q ' o $ -- - $ 0 0 rip 03 1 Off mk _ ------ s--- S r- i -" •31.' O m Mi _ --14 or a). 1 OO' a 1 c4.i.*v1A .a► e -4 :. .: "Of €i os or ' oe i INE _srf EET- W N to 4) . 4, J MAP B AREA 9B Detail Map 4 .?/NE _s-F73EET L 14.1 '! GRA -V EL Ey Couii • E9 L9 . (E). • 1 F9 09/ k57 ® .011) 05/ - .Fmr. t© 44j PC OS/ s s �ti MAPS ARIA 9B Detail Map 5 HoP1ciNs AVENUE OCEAN V IEkI Location a. Address: hl.alvlll 1✓..•+ate 1�.rlaay.+ Area 9 b.Legal: See attached map 2. Description Rezone of area 9 to be consistent with General Plan policies. 3. Sponsor a. Name: Planning Department b. Mailing Address: 1315 Valley.Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 me Phone: 213-376-6984 NEGATIVE DECLARATION a • In accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City of Hermosa beach, which im- plements the California Environmental quality Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach, the Environmental Review Committee must make an environmental review of all private projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planning Commission must make an environmental review of all public projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, which are subject to the Environmental quality Act. This declaration is documentation of the review and, if it be- comes final, no comprehensive Enviromnental Impact Report is required for this project. FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro- posed project in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive. Environmental Impact Report because, urea are includcd in the projcct, it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation s,.,ortin•_this finding is on file in the Building Department. 3-17-88 Date of Finding Cha _'' i� ' • - tal Rev4ew Committee FINDING OF THE PLAN NG COMMISSION We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro- ject in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environ- mental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation measures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on the en- vironment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Build- •ing Department. `• 3 /$7,4fc$ Date of Finding AtAr0w Chai f an, Planning Commission FINDING OF THE CITY COUNCIL We have undertaken and completed an environmental Impact Review of this pro- posed project in accordance with Resolution 70-4309 of the City Council of • Hermosa Beach, and find this project does not require a comprehensive En- •� vironmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas- ures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on. the environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Building Department. # June 14, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 14, 1988 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION, OFFICERS' AND SERGEANTS' BARGAINING UNIT A resolution adopting the negotiated Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Police Officers' Association has been submitted for adoption by the Council at tonight's meeting. The changes negotiated in this MOU include: * Article 7 Management Rights - previous MOU did not address the specific powers, rights, authority, duties and responsibili- ties retained by the City. * Article 11 Work Schedule - City agreed to continue the cur- rent work schedule of the 3/12 plan for patrol officers/sergeants and the 4/10 plan for investigative officers/sergeants. * Article 12(c) Compensation - Caps the amount of holiday and overtime compensatory time which can be carried as an accrual at 175 hours. * Article 13 Base Salary - Increases base salary range 97 retroactive to March 1, 1988. Provides for a 5% increase to be effective March 1, 1989 and a 77 increase to be effective March 1, 1990. * Article 14 Overtime Practice - Establishes a 28 day work period for all sworn police personnel. Maintains current prac- tice of compensation at the rate of time and one-half for hours worked in excess of the standard work shift. * Article 15 Insurance Coverage - Increases life insurance amount from $24,500 to $40,000. * Article 23 Bereavement Leave - Establishes a maximum of 24 hours per year available for an employee to use in the event of a death in their immediate family. * Article 25 Educational Incentive - Includes monthly payment to employees hired after May 2, 1984 for receiving an Intermedi- ate or Advanced P.O.S.T. certificate. Payment amount is $125 and $250 per month respectively. Previous contract limited this monthly payment for individuals in this catagory for AA degree ($125/mo) or BA degree ($250/mo.) only. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION1 * Article 26 Uniform Allowance - Increases yearly uniform al- lowance from $600 to S700. * Article 28 Assignment Pay - Changes compensation for Motor- cycle Duty pay from In of monthly salary to $280 per month. * Article 30 Extra Job Sign -Ups - Allows the City to hire civilian employees to enforce Municipal Code provisions relating to bicycles and skateboards. * Article 36 No Smoking - Allows that only non-smokers will be considered for the position of Police Officer. The first year increased "cost" to the City for contract is $129,086. This figure includes the ry, uniform allowance, insurance and associated other existing premiums to pay, retirement, and the negotiated increase in sala- increases in insurances. In preparation for negotiations, the City conducted comoarsion salary surveys of surrounding municipalities. The results of these surveys showed that the City's Police Officers were 12.5%- 15.3% below the average compensation of those cities surveyed and Police Sergeants were 15.4%-18.4% below. The variation in the range reflects different combinations of the municipalities se- lected to include in a survey. As a result of this negotiation the City has been able to narrow that gap to 3.8%-5.8% below average for Officers and 5.9%-8.6% below average for Sergeants (current negotiations in the surveyed cities will impact these percentages). espectfully submi ed, Noted: Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager June 9, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 14, 1988 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION, OFFICERS' AND SERGEANTS' BARGAINING UNIT Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution. Background: The existing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Police Officers Association, Officers' and Sergeants Bar- gaining Unit, expired February 29, 1988. The City and the Association have met and conferred toward reach- ing agreement on a successor MOU. That MOU is attached for coun- cil approval. Analysis: In addition to certain language items, the attached Memorandum of Understanding establishes: * A 9% base salary increase effective March 1, 1988. * A 5% base salary increase to be effective March 1, 1989. * A 7% base salary increase to be effective March 1, 1990. * An increase in Life Insurance coverage to S40,000. * An increase of S100.00 per year for uniform allowance Respectfully submit obert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Concur: Kevin B. North City Manager raft 1 e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE HER- MOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, OFFICERS' AND SERGEANTS' BARGAINING UNIT WHEREAS, the Hermosa Beach Police Officers and Sergeants' have elected to meet and confer with the City of Hermosa Beach on matters concerning wages, hours, and working conditions; and, WHEREAS, the above personnel have selected certain indi- viduals to represent them; and WHEREAS, Employee and Management representatives have jointly negotiated a Memorandum of Understanding which have been ratified by a majority vote of the members of the Police Of- ficers' and Sergeants' Bargaining Unit. Said Memorandum of Understanding is attached hereto as "Exhibit A".; and, WHEREAS, the Employee Representatives and the City Manager have signed the Memorandum of Understanding and have mutually agreed to recommend that the City Council adopt this Memorandum of Understanding; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA RESOLVES to enter into said Memorandum of Understanding to be dated June 2, 1988, and to be effective for the period March 1, 1988 through and including February 28, 1991. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which time same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 14th day of June, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: , City Clerk , City Attorney MARCH 1, 1988 - FEBRUARY 28, 1991 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH A FORMAL MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SETTING FORTH THE HOURS, WAGES, AND WORKING CONDITIONS FOR EMPOYEES REPRESENTED BY THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS° ASSOCIATION. POLICE OFFICERS & POLICE SERGEANTS BARGAINING GROUP MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS AND POLICE SERGEANTS BARGAINING GROUP 1. PARTIES TO THE MEMORANDUM This Memorandum of Understanding, hereinafter referred to as the "MOU" or the "Agreement," has been entered into, pursuant to the laws of the State of California and the City of Hermosa Beach, California, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, hereinafter referred to as the "City" or as "Management," and the HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, hereinafter referred to as the "Association." 2. RECOGNITION Pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, (Government Code 3500, et seq.), the City agrees to, and does, recognize the Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association as the exclusive representative of the full-time positions in the clas- sifications of POLICE OFFICER AND POLICE SERGEANT of the City of Hermosa Beach. 3. SCOPE & IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This memorandum of understanding constitutes the joint recommen- dation of Management and the Association. It shall not be bind- ing in whole or in part upon the parties unless and until the following conditions have been complied with: 1. The association shall notify the City Council in writing that it has formally approved the Memorandum of Understanding in its entirety. 2. The City Council shall approve this Memorandum of Understanding. 3. This MOU has been reached following good -faith negotiations, by the authorized Management representative of the City Coun- cil and the authorized representative for the Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association. 4. MONTHLY MEETINGS In the interest of fostering and continuing a spirit and atmo- sphere of harmonious employer-employee relationships, it is agreed that the Association Board of Directors shall meet once a month at a designated time and place with administrative officers of the Department. There shall be no less than two (2) Board members present for each such meeting. t It is further agreed that the Association and the City Manager shall meet quarterly to best effect implementation of this document. 5. JOB ACTION The Association and its members agree that during the term of this MOU there shall be no strike. In the event of an unauthorized strike, the City agrees that there will be no liability on the part of the Association pro- vided the Association promptly and publicly disavows such unau- thorized action; orders the employees to return to work and at- tempts to bring about a prompt resumption of normal operations; and provided further, that the Association notifies the City in writing, within 48 hours after the commencement of such strike, what measures it has taken to comply with the provisions of this strike. In the event such strike by the Association has not affected resumption of normal work practices, the City shall have the right to take appropriate disciplinary action. 6. NON-DISCRIMINATION The City shall not discriminate against any employee because of race, color, age, creed, national origin, sex, handicap, medical condition, marital status, or union activities in any matter. 7. MANAGEMENT RIGHTS 1. Manage the City. 2. Schedule working hours. 3. Establish, modify or change work schedules or standards. 4. Institute changes in procedures. 5. Direct the work force, including the right to hire, promote, demote, transfer, suspend, discipline or discharge any employee. 6. Determine the location of any new facilities, building, departments, divisions, or subdivisions thereof, and the relocation, sale, leasing or closing of facilities, depart- ments, divisions, or subdivisions thereof. 7. Determine services to be rendered. 8. Determine the layout of buildings and equipment and materials to be used herein. 9. Determine processes, techniques, methods and means of per- forming work. 10. Determine the size, character and use of inventories. 11. Determine the financial policy including accounting procedures 12. Determine the administrative organization of the system. 13. Determine selection, promotion, or transfer of employees. 14. Determine the size and characteristics of the work force. 15. Determine the allocation and assignment of work to employees. 16. Determine policy affecting the selection of new employees. 17. Determine the establishment of quality and quantity standards and the judgment of quality and quantity of work required. 18. Determine administration of discipline. 19. Determine control and use of City property, materials and equipment. 20. Schedule work periods and determine the number and duration of work periods. 21. Establish, modify, eliminate or enforce rules and regulations. 22. Place work with outside firms. 23. Determine the kinds and numbers of personnel necessary. 24. Determine the methods and means by which such operations are to be conducted. 25. Require employees, where necessary, to take in-service train- ing courses during working hours. 26. Determine duties to be included in any job classifications. 27. Determine the necessity of overtime and the amount of over- time required. 28. Take any necessary action to carry out the mission of the City in cases of an emergency. The exercise of the foregoing powers, rights authority, duties and responsibilities by the City, the adoption of policies, rules, regulations and practices in furtherance thereof, and the use of judgment and the discretion in connection therewith, shall be limited only by the specific and express terms of this Memo- randum of Understanding, City Personnel Ordinance and Personnel Rules and Regulations, the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights, and other statutory law. Except in emergencies, or where the City is required to make changes in its operations because of the requirements of law, whenever the exercise of management's rights shall impact on em- ployees of the bargaining unit, the City agrees to meet and con- fer with representatives of the Association, upon request by the Association, regarding the impact of the exercise of such rights unless the matter of the exercise of such rights is provided for in this Memorandum of Understanding. 8. PROVISIONS OF LAW - INSEPARABILITY It is mutually understood that this MOU is, and shall be, subject to all current and future applicable state, federal and local laws. If any article, part, provision or segment of this MOU is, or shall be, in conflict with or inconsistent with such ap- plicable provisions of federal, state or local law, or is other- wise held to be invalid, or unenforceable by any court of compe- tent jurisdiction by final decree, such article, part or provi- sion thereof shall be superseded by such applicable law and the remainder of this MOU shall in no way be affected thereby. 9. FULL UNDERSTANDING, MODIFICATION, WAIVER It is intended that this Agreement sets forth the full and entire understanding of the parties regarding the matters set forth herein, and any other prior or existing understanding or agree- ments by the parties whether formal or informal, regarding any such matters are hereby superseded or terminated in their entirety. Except as specifically provided herein, it is agreed and under- stood that each party hereto voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives its right, and agrees that the other shall not be required to negotiate with respect to any subject or matter covered herein during the term of this agreement. Any agreement, alteration, understanding, variation, waiver, or modification of any of the terms or provisions contained herein shall not be binding upon the parties hereto unless made and exe- cuted in writing by all parties hereto, and if required, approved and implemented by the City Council. The waiver of any breach, term or condition of this Agreement by either party shall not constitute a precedent in the future en- forcement of all its terms and provisions. 10. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE The Grievance Procedure is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. 11. WORK SCHEDULE The City agrees to continue the experimental utilization of the 3/12 plan for officers and sergeants assigned to patrol. and the 4/10 plan for officers and sergeants assigned to investigation. The City may cancel this scheduling plan, without cause, at any time during the term of this Memorandum of Understanding by giving the Association three (3) months written notice. Upon such notice, the City shall, at the request of the Association, meet and confer on a new scheduling plan. Absent mutual agree- ment, the City shall revert to the 5/8 plan in effect prior to the experimental work plan. In the event of an emergency situation, the City may cancel, al- ter or amend the work schedule as necessary, immediately. 12. COMPENSATION - METHODS OF COMPENSATION A. Methods of compensation: 1. Compensation shall be determined on an hourly basis. 2. Payments due shall be paid on a bimonthly basis unless other- wise mutually agreed. By mutual consent early payments and other modifications can be made. 3. Base hourly salary shall be considered the rate of pay for a particular classification without consideration of any other form of compensation. 4 B. Salary Advancements Within Base Pay Range: 1. Step advancement: a. All salary advances shall be based on merit and fitness. All increases shall be recommended by the Department Head and approved by the Personnel Officer/City Manager. Merit increases shall be effective at the beginning of a pay period. b. Upon the successful and satisfactory completion of twelve (12) months service, employees shall be advanced one step within their range and yearly thereafter until the maxi- mum within the range achieved. 2. Promotion An employee who is promoted to a position in a class with a high- er salary rate shall be entitled to the lowest step in the higher range which exceeds the present rate of pay with the intent of increasing the base salary rate by at least 5%. C. Compensatory Time: Employees may accrue up to 175 hours of compensatory time and may cash out all or part of such accrued time at any time, subject to the budgetary constraints of the department. 13. BASE SALARY Effective with the commencement of this MOU, the base salary range for the classifications in the bargaining unit shall be: Step: A B C D Commencing March 1, 1988: POLICE OFFICER: $2472 2595 2725 2861 POLICE SERGEANT: 2893 3037 3189 3348 Commencing March 1, 1989: POLICE OFFICER 2595 2725 2861 3004 POLICE SERGEANT 3037 3189 3348 3515 Commencing March 1, 1990: POLICE OFFICER: 2776 2915 3061 3214 POLICE SERGEANT: 3249 3411 3582 3761 5 14. OVERTIME PRACTICES A. 7K Exemption - The City of Hermosa Beach has exercised its ability to take a statutory "7K" exemption for sworn police personnel. The work period for such employees shall be 28 days in length commencing on Sunday, May 22, 1988, at 12:01 A.M. B. F.L.S.A. Overtime - All employees required to perform in ex- cess of the standard work shift, or at times other than their regularly scheduled work shift, shall receive compensation at the rate of time and one-half their regular rate of pay. The regular rate of pay shall include the following components in addition to base salary. 1. Educational incentive. 2. Assignment Pay. 3. Longevity Pay. C. Paid Leave Exclusions - In determining an employee's eligibility for overtime compensation in a work day, paid leaves of absence and unpaid leaves of absence shall be ex- cluded from the total hours worked. For this purpose, paid leaves of absences include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Vacation 2. Holiday Leave 3. Sick Leave 4. Compensatory Leave 5. 4850 Time 6. Jury Duty 7. Military Leave D. Compensatory Time In lieu of receiving cash payment for overtime hours, an em- ployee may elect the option of taking compensatory time off. Compensatory time shall be earned at the time and one-half rate for each hour worked. An employee may accrue up to a maximum of 175 hours (after conversion at time and one-half) compensatory time. This maximum accumulation also includes holiday compensatory time. E. Overtime Authorization All overtime requests must have prior written authorization of a supervisor prior to the commencement of such overtime work. Where prior written authorization is not feasible, explicit verbal authorization must be obtained. Where verbal authorization is obtained, written authorization must be ob- tained as soon thereafter as practicable. Dispatched calls beyond the end of duty time are considered as authorized. An employee's failure to obtain prior written approval, or ex- plicit verbal authorization followed by written authoriza- tion, will result in the denial of the overtime request. F. Shift Trades The practice of shift trading shall be voluntary on behalf of each employee involved in the trade. The trade must be due to the employee's desire or need to attend to a personal mat- ter and not due to the department's operations. The employee providing the trade shall not have his/her compensable hours increased as a result of the trade; nor shall the employee receiving the trade have their compensable hours decreased as a result of the trade. Any premium pay or other extra com- pensation shall continue to accrue only to the person originally entitled to the premium pay or extra compensation. Any hours worked beyond the normal work day will be credited to the individual actually doing work. "Paybacks" of shift trade are the obligation of the two employees involved in the trade. Paybacks are to be completed within one (1) calendar year of the date of the initial shift trade. Any dispute as to the paybacks is to be resolved by the involved employees, and under no circumstances will the department be obligated for any further compensation whatsoever to any of the in- volved employees. The department is not responsible in any manner for hours owed to employees by other employees that leave the employment of the City or are assigned other duties. A record of all initial shift trades and "paybacks" shall be maintained by the involved employees on forms pro- vided by the department ("shift trade log.") If one individual fails to appear for the other (regardless of the reason), the person who was scheduled as a resut of the shift trade will be listed as absent without leave and may be subject to disciplinary action. G. Early Relief Policy The practice of early shift release shall be voluntary on behalf of each employee involved in the relief. The employee providing the early relief shall not have his/her compensable hours increased as a result of the early relief, nor shall the employee relieved early have their compensable hours de- creased as a result of the early relief. "Paybacks" of early relief hours are the sole obligation of the two employees involved in the early relief. Any dispute is to be resolved by the involved employees, and under no circumstances will the department be obligated for any further compensation whatsoever to any of the involved employees. The department is not responsible in any manner for hours owed to employees by other employees that leave the employment of the City or are assigned other duties. H. Training Time Attendance at training school/facilities (including the academy) which improves the performance of regular tasks and/ or prepares for job advancement are not compensable for hours in excess of the employee's normal work shift. Any time spent in excess of the normal work shift will not be counted as working time and is not compensable in any manner whatsoever. Time spent in studying and other personal pursuits is not compensable hours of work. I. City Vehicle Use Except as otherwise herein provided, employees who are pro- vided with a City vehicle to travel to and from work shall not be compensated in any manner whatsoever for travel time to and from work. This provision also applies in those situations where the radio must be left on and monitored. J. City Motorcycle Use Employees assigned to motor duty may, with the approval of the Director of Public Safety, use the city assigned motorcy- cle to travel to and from work. Such travel time will not be compensated in any manner whatsoever (even when the employee is required to leave the radio on and monitor the radio.) Any work the employee performs on the motorcycle while away from the police facility will not be considered hours worked and will not be compensated in any manner whatsoever.Clothes Changing K. Clothes Changing Employees are not authorized to wear their uniforms or any part thereof that is distinguishable as such unless on duty. Each employee is provided with a locker for their personal convenience. Any employee may or may not utilize the locker for storage and changing purposes at their own discretion. Nothing herein prevents an employee from wearing their uni- form to and/or from their residence to work as long as the badge and insignia are covered in a non -police issued garment such as a windbreaker. Employees choosing to wear their uni- forms covered to and/or from work should not wear their "Sam - Browne" belt. Time spent in changing clothes before or after shift, is not considered hours worked and is not compensable in any manner whatsoever. L. Call Backs Call Back duty occurs when an employee is ordered to return to duty on a non -regularly scheduled work shift. Call back does not occur when an employee is held over from their prior shift or is working prior to their regularly scheduled shift. An employee called back to duty shall be credited with a minimum of two hours work commencing when the employee reports to work. Any hours worked in excess of two hours shall be credited on an hour -for -hour basis for actual time worked. This provision is to be distinguished from Court pay which is to be used when an employee is called back to court. M. Court Time When an officer is physically called to court, they shall be credited on an hour -for -hour basis for the time actually spent in court. They shall receive a minimum three (3) hours for a morning appearance and a minimum three (3) hours for an afternoon appearance. Travel time shall be included for any subpoenaed appearance other than to the Torrance Courthouse. N. Standby Court Time An empoyee who while off duty is on court standby status may leave a telephone number where they may be reached while on court standby. Such time is not considered hours worked under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The employee will receive straight time pay, up to a maximum of 8.5 hours per day, for standby during the pendency of the case. 15. INSURANCE COVERAGE A. LIFE City shall provide a life insurance policy for each employee, payable in the amount of $40,000 upon such employee's death. B. MENTAL HEALTH City shall make such a plan available to city employees; the full cost to be paid by the employee. C. VISION City shall make such a plan available to city employees; the full cost to be paid by the employee. D. HEALTH City shall provide for Association members a health insurance plan to include a choice of an annuity plan with $250.00 de- ductible or an HMO plan; both plans to include maternity care and prescription benefits. City to pay employee costs and current dependent rate with any future increased dependent costs to be borne 80% City and 20% employee. E. DENTAL City shall provide for Association members a dental insurance plan to include a choice of an annuity plan or an HMO plan. 9 City to pay employee cost and current dependent rate with any future increased dependent costs to be borne 80% City and 20% employee. 16. DEFERRED COMPENSATION City agrees to make available to all employees in the Unit the citywide Deferred Compensation Plan. All participants being then eligible to vote on decisions of the Deferred Compensation Committee. 17. SALARY CONTINUATION PLAN Management agrees to contribute for each member of the Unit, the sum of Fourteen and 40/100 dollars ($14.40) per month per person toward the purchase of a Long Term Disability plan through the Association. Any cost in excess of this shall be borne by the Association. 18. RETIREMENT The City agrees to continue its policy of providing employees in this representation unit with the "one year final compensation plan" for the calculation of retirement based on the highest 12 consecutive months earnings. The City will pay 9/9 of the employee's contribution to the PERS retirement system credited to the employee's portion. 19. LEAVE OF ABSENCE Management agrees to allow all employees covered by this MOU to take a leave of absence without pay, not to exceed 60 days, in conjunction with, or in addition to, their regular vacation time. This leave will only be allowed every other year and cannot be taken during the months of June, July, or August. Any officer wishing to take this leave must exhaust all compensatory time prior to utilization of the leave. The officer must also exhaust vacation time. This provision shall not reduce any leave enti- tlement an employee may have under the Military and Veterans Code. 20. VACATION Vacation accrual rates shall be as follows: A. For employees initially hired before May 2, 1984. 1. Upon hire, 2. Commencing 3. Commencing 4. Commencing 5. Commencing 6. Commencing at the rate of 96 hours/year. with the 7th year, at the rate of 112 hours/year. with the 8th year, at the rate of 136 hours/year. with the 15th year, at the rate of 160 hours/year. with the 16th year, at the rate of 168 hours/year. with the 17th year, at the rate of 176 hours/year. B. For employees hired after May 1, 1984. 1. No accrual during time served as a Police Recruit. 2. Upon graduation from the Academy,or upon hire as a Lateral Entry, at the rate of 72 hours/yr. 3. At the rate of 96 hours/yr. commencing with the thirty sixth (36) month after (2) above. 4. At the rate of 112 after (2) above. 5. At the rate of 128 after (2) above. hours/year commencing with the 7th year hours/year commencing with the 10th year 6. At the rate of eight additional hours/year commencing with the llth year after (2) above to a maximum of 20 days/year. C. Each member of the bargaining unit will be required to use the number of hours accumulated for vacation purposes during each fiscal year. During the fiscal year, if within ninety (90) days following completion of the fiscal year the indi- vidual has not utilized these vacation hours off, they shall then be paid for them. An individual may accumulate and hold as unused vacation hours an amount equal to the total number of hours that can be accrued in an 18 -month period. 21. HOLIDAYS The following holidays shall be considered as paid: New Year's Day Lincoln's Birthday Washington's Birthday Memorial Day Independence Day Labor Day Admissions Day Veteran's Day Thanksgiving Day Day after Thanksgiving Christmas Day Birthday Additional, each employee shall be credited 1.33 hours per month additional compensatory time. Said time off to not conflict with departmental scheduling. 22. SICK LEAVE Sick leave accrual shall be as follows: 1. For all employees initially hired before May 2, 1984: A. Those employees having less than 176 accrued hours of sick leave shall accrue sick leave at the rate of 6 hours per month until their accrual accumulates to 176 hours at which time their accrual shall be 8 hours per month. B. A once a year cash -in can be up to 100% of the unused sick leave as long as at least 176 accrued hours remains on hand. An employee may accrue a maximum of three hun- dred and fifty hours (350); thereafter any excess shall be cashed out. Employees who have more than 350 hours of sick time on the books as of June 1, 1988 shall be frozen at that accumulation; any earned sick time in excess of that amount shall be cashed out. 2. For A. B. C. D. employees hired after May 1, 1984: Zero during academy. Upon graduation from the Academy or upon hire as a lateral entry, 4 hours per month for the initial 12 months. 5 hours per month for the next 12 months. 6 hours per month thereafter and subject to all of (1) above. 3. Upon termination from City employment, sick leave will be paid at the current hourly pay rate, on the following conditions: 1. One-quarter pay from 5 to 10 years of continuous service. 2. One-half pay from 10 years until termination. Upon service retirement from the City, all unused sick leave shall be converted to paid duty status. Said accrued hours shall be included in total compensation calculations for retirement purposes. 23. BEREAVEMENT LEAVE Each employee shall receive a maximum of 24 hours per calendar year to be utilized for bereavement leave because of a death in their immediate family. Immediate family shall mean and include only the employee's spouse, children, stepchildren, parents, spouse's parents, brothers and sisters. Said time will not be cumulative from one twelve month period to another nor will pay in lieu of unused leave for bereavement be provided. 24. LONGEVITY PAY Effective July 1, 1976, all police officers hired after July 1, 1976, will not be entitled to any longevity pay. 25. EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION & MAINTENANCE OF BENEFITS In recognition of formal professional training, obtained from either an accredited educational institution or through P.O.S.T. sanctioned training, City agrees to a concept of pay as an ad- junct to base monthly salary as follows: 1. For employees hired before May 2, 1984: A. Payable at the rate of 5% above base salary for an Inter- mediate P.O.S.T. Certificate or A.A. Degree; B. Payable at the rate of 10% above base salary for an Advanced P.O.S.T. Certificate or a B.A. or B.S. degree; C. Payable at the rate of 5% above base salary for employees who were employed after July 1, 1976 and are employed for 7 years as a sworn peace officer in Hermosa Beach and who obtain an A.A. degree; D. Payable at the rate of 10% above base salary for employ ees who were employed after July 1, 1976 and are employed for 14 years as a sworn peace officer in Hermosa Beach and who obtain a B.A. or B.S. degree. 2. For employees hired after May 2, 1984: A. Payable at the rate of $125/month for an A.A. degree or Intermediate P.O.S.T. Certificate. B. Payable at the rate of $250/month for a B.A. or B.S. degree or Advanced P.O.S.T. Certificate. C. Such compensation shall not exceed $250/month. Employees receiving such compensation are obligated to main- tain the educational level required for P.O.S.T. Certifica- tion, at the city's expense and at the direction of the Police Department. 26. UNIFORM ALLOWANCE Said allowance for Officers and Sergeants to be $700/year, pay- able through the regular payroll schedule. An absence due to sick leave, injury on duty, or leave of absence without pay, exceeding sixty days (60) days shall result in a pro -rata reduction in uniform allowance for the time of the absence. 27. AMMUNITION REPLACEMENT In addition to the quarterly qualification ammunition, each of- ficer will be allowed to utilize fifty (50) rounds of ammunition for their primary duty weapon, at City expense, each month at the firing range used by the Department. The City will also pay for the expense of using the range. The ammunition will be used to practice on an approved course of fire so that officers will be- come more proficient with their service weapons. The City will not compensate officers for the time spent to uti- lize this ammunition. Officers must use the allotted ammunition each month, it does not accumulate. 28. ASSIGNMENT PAY A. The City shall pay as Detective compensation two hundred and twenty dollars ($220.00) per month to each officer assigned to a detective position. That compensation shall be for the additional time detectives are "on-call." This sum shall be included in total compensation calculations for retirement purposes. B. The City agrees to pay the officer assigned as Crime Preven- tion Officer the sum of two hundred and twenty dollars ($220.00) per month as special duty pay, that sum shall be included in total compensation calculations for retirement purposes. C. The City agrees to pay to each officer assigned to field training or acting watch commander duties the sum of one dol- lar eighty eight cents ($1.88) per hour as special duty pay. That sum shall be included in total compensation calculations for retirement purposes. D. The City agrees to pay each officer assigned to Motorcycle Duty the sum of two hundred and eighty dollars ($280.00) per - month. This sum shall be payable when on duty, during haz- ardous duty disability leaves, and during absences from work of less than one month. This sum shall be included in total compensation calculations for retirement purposes. E. It is the intent of these provisions that such assignments will be for career development, and generally will be limited to an assignment of twenty-four (24) months. The right to assign and reassign shall be vested solely with the Director of Public Safety. The parties understand and agree that all assignments to extra -pay positions are temporary assignments, and that of- ficers will be rotated into and out of these assignments as part of the department's job enrichment and career develop- ment program. In conformity with this understanding, each officer who ac- cepts an assignment shall sign a statement indicating that they understand the temporary nature of the assignment. Nothing herein shall abrogate an employee's appeal rights as set forth in Government Code Section 3304. 29. YEARLY SHIFT CHANGES Shift changes will be made three (3) times yearly, and patrol officers and sergeants shall be eligible to bid on all shifts throughout the year. Bidding for shifts and days off will con- tinue to be made on a seniority basis. An officer will not work the same shift three consecutive changes without management's approval. Management shall be permitted to schedule all new hire officers for a two (2) year period without regard to seniority. If exceptional circumstances arise regarding a particular officer who may be a problem, management may change their schedule and/or shift preference. 30. EXTRA JOB SIGN-UPS Regular officers of the Hermosa Beach Police Department will be given priority over reserve officers in the assignment of extra jobs. No restrictions on the number of regular officers who can sign up for extra jobs shall be imposed. Regular officers will be compensated for all hours worked on extra jobs at their regu- lar rate of pay. To be eligible for an extra job, an officer must have completed their probationary period. The officer must have signed up for the job at least five (5) days prior to the date listed on the job posting. If no regular officer has signed up for the job five (5) days prior to the listed date, the job may be assigned to a reserve officer. Available extra jobs will be posted on the bulletin board at least ten (10) days in advance of the job date. In the matter of foot patrol and beach patrol jobs, a monthly schedule will be posted, when possible, at least five (5) days prior to the first day of the month. A sign-up list for foot patrol and beach patrol extra jobs will be posted at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the job for the following month. Failure to work a job assignment after having been selected to do so will be deemed to be a violation of general orders. For emer- gency reasons, an officer may provide a replacement for the extra job from one of the other regular officers to cover the assigned job. For the same reasons, and with the permission of the Divi- sion Commander, a reserve officer may be used as a replacement in an emergency situation. Nothing herein shall prohibit the City from hiring temporary civilian employees to perform police related duties in the en- forcement of Municipal Code provisions relating to bicycles and skateboards. Any additional assignments of temporary civilian employees shall be subject to the meet and confer process. 31. SHIFT COVERAGE If for any reason the Police Department cannot meet a minimum three-person staffing standard requirement, the Department shall have the right to fill positions with qualified reserve officers. This may be done only when all regular officers have been con- tacted to determine their availability to cover the shift or a portion of the shift which will be understaffed. 32. WATCH COMMANDER SELECTION The Director of Public Safety shall have the right to establish criteria for selection of officers to be placed on the Watch Commander's list. The Director shall select any number to be placed on the list and may remove officers or add officers to the list at any time. 33. PERFORMANCE REVIEW Upon completion of probation, each employee shall thereafter be reviewed annually; said review to be constructive in nature and designated to point out areas of strengths, weakness, methods for improvement, etc. 34. DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS For the purpose of defining disciplinary actions, the following definitions shall be applicable: 1. Disciplinary actions are defined as: a. Dismissal. b. Suspension. c. Demotion. d. Reprimand (written) e. Reductions in pay. 2. Reductions in pay are governed by the "Green Section" of the Police Manual. 3. Appeals from the disciplinary actions shall only be sub- ject to the "Blue" section of the Police Manual entitled "Rules and Regulations." 4. Prior to the commencement of any internal investigation which is likely to subject the officer to disciplinary action, the officer shall be advised of their rights pur- suant to Section 3300, et.seq., of the California Govern- ment Code as amended. All rights contained therein shall be applicable to the disciplinary actions and shall be used as a minimum guideline only. 5. Any reprimand record or other writing containing negative comments (with the exception of Performance Evaluations) included in the employee's personnel package is a written reprimand. 6. Inclusionary periods as currently set forth in the Police Department Rules and Regulations shall remain in effect during this M.O.U. 7. Any officer receiving time off dispensed as a result of disciplinary action can use either accumulated compensa- tory time or vacation time at their discretion. However, when exceptional circumstances arise and the City feels that it is in the best interest to keep an officer off duty for a limited period of time (not to exceed five (5) working days), the City may exercise this right. 35. LAYOFF Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 2-42, as currently enacted, is the governing provision regarding layoff. However, City fur- ther agrees that, prior to implementation of any such layoff, discussions shall be held to explore other alternatives, mitiga- tion, etc 36. NO SMOKING The parties agree that the City shall amend its class specifica- tions for unit positions to provide that employees who become unit employees after the date this MOU goes into effect shall, as a condition of their continued employment, refrain from smoking tobacco or any other non -tobacco substance at any time on or off duty. Violation of this condition of employment shall be deemed good cause for dismissal. 37. ASSOCIATION DIRECTORS TRAVEL TIME A maximum of two Board members shall be allowed to attend out of town meetings on City time up to and including a cumulative total of five (5) working days per calendar year provided such out of town meetings are for purposes of Association business. With the permission of the Director of Public Safety additional days may be granted. 38. FURTHER STUDIES The City and Association, jointly recognize that some matters need further study and negotiation during the life of the M.O.U. It is therefore agreed that the following items will be addressed: 1. Voluntary time off without pay. 2. Physical fitness program. 3. Master Officer Program. 39. DURATION OF CONTRACT This MOU is effective March 1, 1988 and shall remain in full force and effect for 36 months thereafter, ending February 28, 1991. In witness whereof, the parties hereto have caused their duly authorized represen ativ s to execut this Memorandum of Under- standing this day of , 1988. HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION Thomas Al. Boh int' ,Prsident CITY OF HERMOS BEAC Steve Wisniewski rector of Publ.,�j= fety Robert Blackwood Personnel Director GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES FOR HERMOSA BEACII POLICE DEPARTMENT ATTR "A" I.. Purpose of Grievance Procedures a. To promote improved employee -employer relations by establishing grievance a procedures on matters. b. To provide that grievances shall be heard and settled as informally as possible. c. To enable grievances to be settled promptly and/or as near to the point of origin as possible. II. Definition A grievance is defined as any dispute concerning the interpretation, intent or application of the written Memorandum of Understanding or departmental rules and regulations governing personnel practices or working conditions applicable to'employees covered by the ;•Iemorandum of Understanding. An impasse in meeting and conferring upon the terms of a proposed Memorandum of Understanding is not a grievance. III. Conduct of Grievance Procedure a. An employee may request the assistance of another person of his own choosing in preparing and prese:•:tit his grievance at any level of review, or may be represented by a recognized employee organization,• or may represent himself. • III. b. The employee and his representative, if any, may use a reasonable amount of work time, as determined by the appropriate Division Commander, and a Police Association Board Representative, in conferring about and presenting a grievance. c. Any grievance relating to the retroactive status of monetary or fiscal matters shall be limited to the date of filing of the grievance in writing, except in such cases where it would be impossible for the employee to have prior knowledge of an accounting error, or where the error is departmentally or City caused. d. The time limits specified may be extended to a definite date by mutual agreement of the employee and the reviewer concerned. e. Employees shall be free from reprisal for using the grievance procedure. -2- Iv. Matters Subject to Grievance Procedure Full-time employees having probationary or permanent status may process a personal grievance on one, or more than one, of the following grounds. a. Improper application of rules, regulations and procedures. b. Unfair treatment, including coercion, restraint, or reprisal. c. Reduction in force action - layoffs. d. Promotion procedures implemented unfairly. e. Classification of position. f. Non -selection for training opportunities. g. Discrimination because of race, religion, color creed, or national origin. h. Any matter affecting an employee's work schedule, fringe benefits, holidays, vacation, sick leave, retirement, performance, rating, a change in classification, salary, work assignment, or any other matter affecting wages, hours or working conditions. i. Discharge, demotion, or suspension. j. Individual disputes over the intents or application: of the provisions of the most recent officially signed agreement between the City and their recognized employee representatives. Probationary employees may file grievances under all of the above, but not as applied to their performance ratir or dismissal. -3- V. Grievance Procedure a. Step One - Informal Process An employee must attempt first to resolve a grievance through discussion with his immediate supervisor with- out undue delay on an informal basis. If, after such discussion the employee does not believe the problem has been satisfactorily resolved, he shall have the right and obligation to discuss it with his supervisor': immediate superior, if any, and his department head if necessary. Every effort shall be made to find an acceptable solution by these informal means at the most immediate level of supervision. At no time may the informal process go beyond the department head concerned. In order that this informal procedure may be responsive, all parties involved shall expedite this process. In no case may more than fifteen (15) calendar days elapse from the date of the alleged incident or action and the resolutions of the ,grievance or com- pletion of the informal process. Said grievance shall be considered waived if not so presented to the im- mediate supervisor within fifteen (15) calendar days following the day during which the event upon which the grievance is based occurred. Step Two - Formal Process - Management Supervisor If the grievance is not resolved through the informal process, the employee shall have the right within ten (10) working days from the decision or completion of the informal process to file the grievance in writ.ng on a specified form and present it to his Division Commander. The Division Commander shall discuss the grievance with the employee and shall render a -4 V. Grievance Procedure decision and comments in writing and return them to the employee within ten (10) working days after receiving the grievance. Failure of the grievant to serve such written notice ten (10) calendar days following the termination of the informal step shall constitute a waiver of the grievance. Step Three - Formal Process - Department Iiead If the grievance procedure is not resolved at Step 2 and the employee is notified in writing, the employee may, within the next five (5) working days present the grievance in writing to the department head. In the event that no written response is given to the employee within ten (10) working days from the date of submission of the written grievance, the grievance will be as- sumed to have been valid and the employer will take steps to correct that problem. Failure of the em- ployee to take appropriate action within the pres- cribed time periods will be deemed to constitute termination of the grievance. Failure of the em- ployer to respond within the time provided will be deemed to be an admission as to the validity of the grievance and will require affirmative action to correct the grievance. The department head shall render his decision and comments in writing within five (5) working days from the date of receipt of . the grievance and return them to the employee within that time. • 1! J V. Grievance Procedure Step Four - Advisory Arbitration a. If the grievance is not resolved in Step 3 the employee may within five (5) working days, present the grievance in writing to the City Manager or his designate for processing. Failure of the employee to take this action within five (5) working days from the date of receipt of rejection of ..the grievance in Step 3 will be deemed to constitute a termination of the grievance. b. The scope of the advisory arbitration of grievance shall include all of the grievable matters as set forth in Section 4 of this procedure. An exception would be those matters that by Peoples Ordinance NS 211 must be adjudicated by the Ilermosa Beach Civil Service Commis- sion. All other grievances shall bypass Step 4 of the grievance procedure and go to.the Step 5 procedures. An employee who chooses advisory arbitration shall be deemed to have made a choice between the Civil Service Board of Review and arbitration and, therefore, may not seek two hearings on the same grievance. c. As soon as possible, and in any event not later than ten (10) work days after either party received written notice from the other of the desire to arbitrate, the parties shall agree upon an arbitrator unless externa. constraints prohibit compliance, whereupon the earliest date available shall apply. • , V. Grievance Procedure d. Arbitrator shall be selected from a list of seven (7) arbitrators from within two (2) working days. If a mutual agreement cannot be reached at a meeting of the two parties as to selection of an arbitrator, then each party shall strike off a name from the list on an alternating basis until one name remains, which person shall become the arbitrator. The City shall have the first opportunity to strike a name from the list of seven (7) arbitrators. The priorit of striking names shall alternate from one party to the other each time advisory arbitration is invoked by the same parties. e. Any arbitrator appointed must be familiar with em- ployee/management relations in public employment. f. The arbitrator shall hold such hearings and conduct such proceedings as may be necessary, but such hear- ings and proceedings shall be conducted in an ex- peditious and confidential manner with the involved parties only. Employees called as witnesses shall be released from duty as needed. g. The rules of conduct of proceedings shall be ac- cording to those procedures utilized by the Ar- bitration Service. h. The findings of fact and the recommendations of t.-: • arbitrator shall be transmitted to the involved parties and the City Administrator. V. Grievance Procedure i. The fees and expenses, including the making of the record of the arbitrator, shall be borne equally by the parties. Calling of the witnesses by either party shall be done with a reasonable amount of restraint. An excessive use of witnesses will necessitate the cost of loss of work time to be paid by the party calling the witnesses. A decision of the arbitrator may be requested by either party as to whether there may have been an excessive use of witnesses. j. The arbitrator shall have no power to alter, amend, change, add to, or subtract from any of the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding. The decision of the arbitrator shall be based solely upon the evidence and arguments presented to him by the respective parties in the presence of each other. k. The decision of the arbitrator shall be final upon the parties to the dispute unless either party, within 60 days after the final written decision of the arbitrator is personally served upon the party, causes to be filed in a court of competent jur..- sdiction a complaint to review all or any part of t proceeding, upon litigation, the entire matter sh 1. be reviewed and a trial de novo held. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM June 9, 1988 TO: City Council FROM: Robert A. Blackwood, Personnel Director SUBJECT: Police Negotiations - Captains and Lieutenants The Police Officers' Association, Captains and Lieutenants Bar- gaining Unit, will be holding a meeting on Monday, June 13th in order to vote on ratification of the negotiated MOU. Should they vote to ratify the MOU at that time, the Resolution adopting that Memorandum will be forwarded to you prior to Tues- day's City Council meeting. obert A. Blackwood, Director Personnel & Risk Management 2f t June 6, 1988 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL June 14, 1988 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #18895 (C.U.P. CON NO. 87-10) LOCATION: 518 ELEVENTH STREET APPLICANT: JEROME OLGUIN, RALPH RUTHERFORD, KEVIN C. & KIMBERLIE R. MCTAVISH REQUEST: APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP FOR 3 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #18895 which is consistent with the approved Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map #18895 at their October 6, 1987 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially° consistent with the Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. Respactf ` y trhalitted, CONC Michael Schu•ac Planning Director 'Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager T/srfinmap An •erea Associate Pla ner 2g. f • RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #18895 FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 518 ELEVENTH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on June 14, 1988 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property. in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 87-57, adop- ted after public hearing on October 6, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #18895 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 8, Knutsen Tract, as recorded in Book 20, Page 185 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of Los An- geles, for a three -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 518 11th Street, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermo- sa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY T/rsfinmap THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON, Director CECIL E. BUGH, Chief Deputy Director MAS NAGAMI, Assistant Director May 19, 19 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone: (818) 458-5100 ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O. BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE: L-1 The City Council 850.18 City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Council Members: PARCEL MAP NO. 18895 The subject map has been checked by the City Engineer and is ready for your approval. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR COUNCIL: 1. Approve the map. 2. Make findings as follows: a. That this project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1 and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act. b. That the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improve ent, is consistent with the general plan required by Article 5 (camiencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (carmencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code. 3. Instruct the City Clerk to endorse on the face of the map of Parcel Map No. 18895 the certificate which embodies the approval of said map. Please return the signed original tracing to the Subdivision Section, Land Development Division, Department of Public Works, for processing and filing with the Registrar/Recorder of the County of Los Angeles. Very truly yours, T. A. TIDEMANSON City Engineer Roger W. Burger Deputy City Engineer MGR: kc Attachments cc: City clerk Director of Public Works June 9, 1988 Honorable Mayor and City Council Meeting Members of the City Council of June 14, 1988 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 88 - APPROVING APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR FY 1988-89 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution 88 - approving and adopting the annual appropriation limit for fiscal year 1988-89. Background In November of 1979, Article XIIIB of the California State Con- stitution was added by the voters through Proposition 4. This Article established limits, using a formula, on state and local governments for appropriation of revenue from tax proceeds. Appropriations may increase each .year by an amount equal to the percent change in population from January to January and the low- er of two price changes, either the U.S. March to March consumer price index (CPI) or the change in fourth quarter per capita per- sonal income. Revenues received in excess of the amount ap- propriated in accordance with this Article must be returned by a revision of tax rates or fee schedules within the next two subse- quent fiscal years. The limit and appropriations subject to the limit are included in the 1988-89 budget as required by Government Code Section 37200. This is the first year this legislation applies. Mr. James "Jim" Weber, municipal finance consultant, was retained to establish the appropriation limit for 1988-89 and determine appropriations subject to that limit for the 1988-89 budget. Actual revenues and expenditures for 1986-87 and budget estimates for 1987-88 have also been reviewed. Mr. Weber previously developed limits for 1980-81 through 1986-87. Analysis As shown on Attachment A, the limit for 1987-88 was increased by the U.S. CPI of 3.93% and population growth of 1.81% thereby making the limit for 1988-89 $9,505,004. Attachment B indicates that, of this appropriation limit for 1988-89, proposed ap- propriations subject to the limit are $4,348,349 or 46% of the limit. Historically, actual expenditures have been less than budgeted as is anticipated for 87-88, therefore actual appropria- tions expended may be less than the 46% anticipated. City Council Meeting of June 14, 1988 Page 2 At the end of the fiscal year, actual expenditures subject to the limit are analyzed. The calculations for 87-88 appropriations as of April 1988 and actual 86-87 expenditures are attached. The League of California Cities will issue new guidelines for the Gann limitation this summer. Staff will continue to monitor any changes that. can be made in the method of calculation. Viki Copeland Finance Administrator Concur: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 5 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 WHEREAS, the voters of California on November 6, 1979 added Article XIII B to the State Constitution placing various limit- ations on the appropriations of the state and local governments; and WHEREAS, Article XIII B provides that the appropriations limit for the fiscal year 1988-89 is calculated by adjusting the base year appropriations of fiscal year 1978-79 for changes in the cost of living and population; and. WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach has complied with all of the provisions of Article XIII B in determining the appropria- tions limit for fiscal year 1988-89; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS; SECTION 1. That for the City of Hermosa Beach the appropria- tions s limita i-oFi in the fiscal year 1988-89 shall be $9,505,004. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROV TO FOR 27 1V+Jeber Consultant May 26, 1988 Ms. Viki I. Copeland Finance Administrator City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 STATE CONTROLLER'S REPORT POLICIES & PROCEDURES ASSET MANAGEMENT SPECIAL PROJECTS GANN INITIATIVE SALES TAX AUDIT DEBT COLLECTION COST ACCOUNTING TEMPORARY HELP CASH CONTROL SB -90 CLAIMS ACCOUNTING AUDITING BUDGET Dear Ms. Copeland: I have reviewed the accounting records of the City of Hermosa Beach and have attached the following reports: 1. A complete recap sheet on the Gann Appropriation Limitation from the base year (1978-79) to the next year - 1988-89. 2. I have made a complete break -down on the Gann Appropriation for the fiscal year 1987-88, using the estimated revenues and the estimated expenditures. 3. I have made a complete break -down on the Gann Appropriation for the fiscal year 1986-87, using the actual revenues received and the actual expenditures spent. 4. It appears that the City is well below the Limitation on the Gann Initiative at this time and I do not see any problems in the foreseeable future. If you have any questions on this subject, please let me know. It has been a pleasure serving you and the City of Hermosa Beach for the past years and hope that we may continue doing so. If I can assist you on any other financial matters, please let me know. y yoours Jamey "Jim" Weber 803 Virginia Street, El Segundo, Ca. 90245 (213) 322-4803 RECAP 1978-79 TO PRESENT GANN LIMITATIONS Base Year (1978-79) Appropriations and Appropriations Limit Total 1978-79 Budget Appropriations: Less: Non -proceeds of Taxes Revenue $ 6,436,402 1,303,919 Base Year Appropriations Limit $ 5,132,483 CALCULATION OF APPROPRIATION LIMIT Consumer Price Index (1978) (+ 10.17%) Population Adjustment (1978) (- 0.89%) Per Capita Income (1979) (+ 12.11%) Population Adjustment (1979) (- 0.92%) Limitation for 1980-81 Fiscal Year $ 6,225,188 Per Capita Income (1980) (+ 9.12%) Population Adjustment (1980) (- 0.48%u) Limitation for 1981-82 Fiscal Year $ 6,760,554 Consumer Price Index (1981) (+ 6.79%) Population Adjustment (1981) (+ 1.23%) Limitation for 1982-83 Fiscal Year $ 7,308,159 Per Capita Income (1982) (+ 2.357) Population Adjustment (1982) (+ 1.06%) Limitation for 1983-84 Fiscal Year $ 7,558,829 Consumer Price Index (1983) (+ 4.74%) Population Adjustment (1983) (+ 0.6470) Limitation for 1984-85 Fiscal Year $ 7,967,762 Consumer Price Index (1984) (+ 3.7470) Population Adjustment (1984) (- 0.05%) Limitation for 1985-86 Fiscal Year $ 8,261,623 Consumer Price Index (1985) (+ 2.3070) Population Adjustment (1985) (+ 1.87%) Limitation for 1986-87 Fiscal Year $ 8,609,437 Consumer Price Index (1986) (+ 3.04%) Population Adjustment (1986) (+ 1.26%) Limitation for 1987-88 Fiscal Year $ 8,983,087 Consumer Price Index (1987) (+ 3.93%) Population Adjustment (1987) (+ 1.81%) Limitation for 1988-89 Fiscal Year $ 9,505,004 Attachment A CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH GANN INITIATIVE INFORMATION 1988-89 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO THE LIMITATION 14,230,313 LESS NON -PROCEEDS OF TAXES 5,363,491 EQUALS APPROPRIATIONS FROM PROCEEDS OF TAXES 8,866,822 LESS DEBT SERVICE APPROPRIATIONS, AND OTHER APPROPRIATIONS NOT SUBJECT TO LIMITATION 4,518,473 4,348,349 ADD EXCESS USER FEE -0- APPROPRIATION SUBJECT TO LIMIT 4,348,349 4670 APPROPRIATION LIMITATION UNDER GANN INITIATIVE 9,505,004 Attachment B CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH GANN INITIATIVE INFORMATION PROPOSED BUDGET 1988-89 APPROPRIATION GENERAL FUND 8,884,787 LIGHTING DIST FUND 442,490 PARKING FUND 895,487 STATE GAS TAX FUND 471,502 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND -0- PARK & REC. FAC. FUND 141,600 REVENUE SHARING FUND -0- COMM. DEV. BLOCK GRANT -0- TRANSIT FUND (PROP A) 220,566 GRANT FUND 514,800 CROSSING GUARD FUND 58,648 SEWER FUND 1,765,468 INSURANCE FUND 834,965 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND -0- ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND -00- 14,230,313 CITY OF HEMROSA BEACH GANN INITIATIVE INFORMATION PROPOSED BUDGET 1988-89 GENERAL FUND TAXES LICENSES & PERMITS FINES & FORFEITURES USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY INTERGOVERNMENTAL /STATE CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES OTHER REVENUE TAX NON -TAX SOURCES SOURCES 5,283,500.00 89,440.00 765,181.00 253,115.00 135,000.00 225,920.00 33,429.00 316,999.00 40.000.00 6,138,121.00 1,004,463.00 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND 46 4,882.00 PARKING FUND 2,329,500.00 STATE GAS TAX FUND 306,441.00 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 19,000.00 PARK & REC. FAC. FUND 273,807.00 REVENUE SHARING FUND 8,000.00 TRANSIT FUND (PROP A) 251,369.00 GRANT FUND 433,200.00 CROSSING GUARD FUND 78,691.00 SEWER FUND 115,200.00 INSURANCE FUND 24,000.00 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT WAY FUND 777,627.00 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND 1,166,440.00 ASSETS SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND 16,000.00 8,043,250.00 5,363,491.00 GANN INFORMATION 1988-89 APPROPRIATIONS NOT SUBJECT TO LIMITATION DEBT SERVICE -0- OTHER APPROPRIATION NOT SUBJECT TO LIMITATION: (A) STREET LIGHTING FUND (B) STATE GAS TAX FUND (C) GRANT FUND (E) CROSSING GUARD FUND (F) SEWER FUND (G) UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (H) MEDICARE (I) FLSA/OVERTIME (J) LEASE PAYMENTS 411,990.00 474,702.00 596,400.00 54,148.00 2,541,618.00 50,000.00 24,000.00 55,000.00 310,615.00 4,518,473.00 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH GANN INITIATIVE INFORMATION 1987-88 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO THE LIMITATION 14,185,156.00 LESS NON -PROCEEDS OF TAXES 4,663,037.00 EQUALS APPROPRIATIONS FROM PROCEEDS OF TAXES 9,522,119.00 LESS DEBT SERVICE APPROPRIATIONS, AND OTHER APPROPRIATIONS NOT SUBJECT TO LIMITATION ADD EXCESS USER FEE *APPROPRIATION SUBJECT TO LIMIT APPROPRIATION LIMITATION UNDER GANN INITIATIVE 3,520,870.00 6,001,249.00 -0- 6,001,249.00 67% 8,983,087.00 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH GANN INITIATIVE INFORMATION 1987-88 GENERAL FUND TAXES LICENSES & PERMITS FINES & FORFEITURES USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY INTERGOVERNMENTAL /STATE CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES OTHER REVENUE LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND PARKING FUND STATE GAS TAX FUND COUNTY GAS TAX FUND PARK & REC. FAC. FUND REVENUE SHARING FUND COMM. DEV. BLOCK FUND TRANSIT FUND GRANT FUND CROSSING GUARD FUND SEWER FUND INSURANCE FUND TAX NON -TAX SOURCES SOURCES 6,321,989.00 49,280.00 773,660.00 7,144,929.00 507,647.00 285,000.00 251,185.00 140,000.00 222,080.00 31,000.00 321,230.00 18,369.00 983,864.00 2,261,315.00 286,736.00 17,400.00 1,916.00 177,190.00 339,966.00 373,258.00 79,192.00 132,200.00 10,000.00 7,937,576.00 4,663,037.00 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH GANN INFORMATION 1987-88 APPROPRIATIONS GENERAL FUND 8,588,110.00 LIGHTING DIST FUND 520,606.00 PARKING FUND 939,308.00 STATE GAS TAX FUND 859,635.00 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND -0- PARK & REC. FAC. FUND 163,000.00 REVENUE SHARING FUND -0- COMM. DEV. BLOCK GRANT -0- TRANSIT FUND 479,339.00 GRANT FUND 449,224.00 CROSSING GUARD FUND 87,958.00 SEWER FUND 1,329,361.00 INSURANCE FUND 768,615.00 14,185,156.00 GANN INFORMATION 1987-88 APPROPRIATIONS NOT SUBJECT TO LIMITATION DEBT SERVICE -0- OTHER APPROPRIATIONS NOT SUBJECT TO LIMITATION: (A) STREET LIGHTING FUND 520,606.00 (B) STATE GAS TAX FUND 859,635.00 (C) GRANT FUND 449,224.00 (D) CROSSING GUARD FUND 87,958.00 (E) SEWER FUND 1,329,361.00 (F) UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 75,000.00 (G) MEDICARE 14,000.00 (H) FLSA/OVERTIME 50,900.00 (I) LEASE PAYMENTS 134,186.00 3,520,870.00 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH GANN INITIATIVE INFORMATION 1986-87 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO THE LIMITATION 10,264,637.42 LESS NON -PROCEEDS OF TAXES 4,422,143.51 EQUALS APPROPRIATIONS FROM PROCEEDS OF TAXES 5,842,493.91 LESS DEBT SERVICE APPROPRIATIONS, AND OTHER APPROPRIATIONS NOT SUBJECT TO LIMITATION 1,140,589.53 4,701,904.38 ADD EXCESS USER FEES -0- APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMIT 4,701,904.38 557 APPROPRIATION LIMITATION UNDER GANN INITIATIVE 8,609,437.00 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH GANN INFORMATION 1986-87 APPROPRIATIONS GENERAL FUND 7,513,434.35 LIGHTING DIST FUND 390,642.99 PARKING FUND 1,030,849.68 STATE GAS TAX FUND 347,090.87 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND -0- PARK & REC. FAC. FUND 96,721.14 REVENUE SHARING FUND -0- COMM. DEV. BLOCK GRANT (31,906.00) TRANSIT FUND 216,072.67 GRANT FUND 19,908.33 CROSSING GRUAD FUND 63,946.29 SEWER FUND 140,993.11 DEBT SERVICE FUND -0- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND -0- INSURANCE FUND 476,883.99 10,264,637.42 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH GANN INITIATIVE INFORMATION 1986-87 1986-87 BUDGET GENERAL FUND TAXES LICENSES & PERMITS FINES & FORFEITURES USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY INTERGOVERNMENTAL /STATE CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES OTHER REVENUE LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND PARKING FUND STATE GAS TAX FUND COUNTY GAS TAX FUND PARK & REC. FAC. FUND REVENUE SHARING FUND GRANT FUND TRANSIT FUND CROSSING GUARD FUND SEWER FUND DEBT SERVICE FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND INSURANCE FUND TAX NON -TAX SOURCES SOURCES 5,695,518.13 67,534.30 723,472.95 421,166.51 155,354.82 328,762.37 37,400.17 370,785.53 55,957.9 9 6,486,525.38 . 1,369,427.39 471,438.40 251,803.16 222,800.78 7,432,567.72 2,378,537.90 343,147.26 92,942.63 20,477.54 43,447.03 73,154.07 80,835.82 5,972.87 8,970.15 5,230.85 4,422,143.51 GANN INFORMATION 1986-87 APPROPRIATIONS NOT SUBJECT TO LIMITATION DEBT SERVICE -0- OTHER EXPENDITURES NOT SUBJECT TO LIMITATION: (A) STREET.LIGHTING FUND (B) STATE GAS TAX FUND (C) COMM. DEV. BLOCK GRANT FUND (D) GRANT FUND (E) CROSSING GUARD FUND (F) SEWER FUND (G) UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (H) MEDICARE (I) FLSA/OVERTIME (0) LEASE PAYMENTS 390,642.99 347,090.87 (31,906.00) 19,908.33 63,946.29 140,993.11 56,986.78 6,602.42 49,766.00 96,558.74 1,140,589.53 - James P. Lough Attorney at Law 30 North Raymond Avenue Telephone Suite 708 (818) 792-4728 Pasadena, Calif. 91103-3930 May 26, 1988 R18)7924776 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: JAMES P. LOUGH, City Attorney Linda LeVanway, Paralegal RE: Ordinance Repealing City Ordinances Pursuant to Report by Book Publishing Company RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached ordinance repealing legally inconsistent and outdated ordinances from the Hermosa Beach City Code. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the report by Book Publishing Company and review by this office, this office recommended in our memorandum of November 9, 1987, that the Council repeal certain ordinances that are either inconsistent with state law and/or the State Constitution, or are generally obsolete in contemporary society. The Council has directed us to prepare this ordinance in the interest of the citizens of Hermosa Beach, and in the Council's desire to bring the Hermosa Beach City Code up to date with current law. CONCLUSION: Therefore, this office advises the City Council to approve the attached ordinance repealing the 107 sections and subsections contained in the Hermosa Beach City Code deemed legally invalid or socially unacceptable. Respectfully = emitted, P. LOU H, ty Att ney TY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING LEGALLY INCONSISTENT AND SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE ORDINANCES FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE. WHEREAS, the Citizens of the City of Hermosa Beach do not benefit from socially uninforceable and legally inconsistent ordinances remaining within the City Code; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach is committed to maintaining a City Code that is currently legally enforceable; WHEREAS, it has been determined that one hundred seven (107) sections and subsections are contained in the City Code that are either inconsistent with state law, the State Constitution, or the mores of contemporary society; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Section 10-5(b) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Making immoral or obscene dancing unlawful is now repealed. Section 2. That Section 10-5(d) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting females under 21 from acting as dance instructors is now repealed. Section 3. That Section 21-8(b) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting massage by the opposite sex is now repealed. Section 4. That Section 31-4 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Requiring taxicab owners and operators to be U.S. citizens or to have declared their intention to become citizens is now repealed. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 5. That Sections 16-1 to 16-36 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Regulation and control of sanitation of Hospitals, Schools and Nurseries is now repealed. Section 6. That Sections 20-2(a) to 20-2(1), 20-2(o) and 20-2(r) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Nuisances are now repealed. Section 7. That Sections 25-1 to 25-13 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Health and Safety regulation of public eating places is now repealed. Section 8. That Section 21-27 and 21-28 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting fleeing from a police officer and furnishing false information to a peace officer is now repealed. Section 9. That Section 21-2 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Forbiding the sale of crime comic books to minors is now repealed. Section 10. That Section 21-4 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting the use of glue and like substances for purposes of intoxication is now repealed. Section 11. That Section 21-15 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Making sexual intercourse among unmarried person unlawful is now repealed. Section 12. That Section 21-16 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting trespassing on posted property is now repealed. Section 13. That Section 21-24 to 21-26 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Littering is now repealed. Section 14. That Section 18-1 to 18-2 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting the sale of firearms to minors and the possession of firearms by minors is now repealed. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 15. That Section 18-4 and 18-5 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Unlawful for parents or guardians to allow or permit minors to violate curfew provisions or other Provisions in Chapter 18 is now repealed. Section 16. That Section 18-6 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Misrepresentation of age by minor for the purpose of obtaining alcoholic beverages is now repealed. Section 17. That Section 18-11 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Unlawful for females under 21 to act as dance instructors is now repealed. Section 18. That Section 18-12 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting dance instruction in rooms not visible from main dance floor is now repealed. Section 19. That Sections 26-1 to 26-12 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Felon Registration is now repealed. Section 20. That Section 21-22 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Unlawful to carry certain concealed weapons without permit from Mayor is now repealed. Section 21. That Section 21-1 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Abandoned Refrigerators is now repealed. Section 22. That Section 19-6 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting persons from clinging to moving vehicles is now repealed. Section 23. That Section 19-14 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Vehicles emerging from private property and alleys is now repealed. Section 24. That Sections 19-21 to 19-23 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Accidents and Reports is now repealed. 1 2 3. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 25. That Section 19-20.1 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Abandoned Vehicles is now repealed. Section 26. That Sections 6-1 to 6-7 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Bicycle Licensing is now repealed. Section 27. That Section 19-31 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Misdemeanor to violate Chapter 19 is now repealed. Section 28. That Section 22-3(j) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting profane or indecent language in parks is now repealed. Section 29. That Section 22-3(0) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Gambling is now repealed. Section 30. That Section 17-50(d) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Gambling is now repealed. Section 31. That Section 5-11(c) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Prohibiting vulgar, profane language is now repealed. Section 32. That Section 5-11(a) and 5-11(b) of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Loud Noises is now repealed. Section 33. That Section 5-20 of the Hermosa Beach City Code Prohibiting intoxicated persons to be on the beaches is now repealed. Section 34. That Section 23-6 and 23-7 of the Hermosa Beach City Code - Reporting Requirements of Pawnbrokers is now repealed. Section 35. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Section 36. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1� 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 37. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO F P. LOUGH, L16/RPORD ITY AT ORNEY May 16, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council May 24,1988 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION NOT TO MERGE LOTS LOCATION/ 1254 20TH STREET OWNER: R. JANET HALLGREN, TRUST - CONTINUED FROM 5/24/88 1224 20TH PLACE CHAO-HSING PIAN INITIATED BY MAYOR ETTA SIMPSON Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council merge the lots on appeal pursuant to Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-29 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Background 1254 20th Street - The Planning Commission, at their meeting of April 5, 1988, approved the applicant's request not to merge the subject lots. The City Council, at their meeting of May 3, 1988, continued the Public Hearing regarding the appeal of this matter'. 1224 20th Place - The Planning Commission, at their meeting of May 3, 1988, approved the applicant's request not to merge the subject lots. Abstract The Planning Commission decision will allow the property owners to create substandard parcels rather than merging the lots as intended by the Lot Merger Ordinance. Analysis The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in LM 88-21 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. Staff finds these lots to be subject to merger since less than 80% of the block has been split and the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. The property owners were notified of the appeal by certified mail. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt the subject properties from being subject to merger. 1 Continued - Lot Merger Appeal Additional background and analysis is provided in the attached Planning Commission staff reports of April 5, April 19, May 3, 1988, as well as the City Council staff report of May 24, 1988. Attachments 1. Resolution No. 88- 2. CC staff report of 5/24/88 3. PC staff reports of 4/5/88, 4/19/88, and 5/3/88 4. PC minutes of 4/5/88, 4/19/88, and 5/3/88 5. Background a. Letter from Mayor Simpson requesting appeal b. Letter to property owners with notification c. Lot Merger Letter 1 d. Intent to Merge Lot e. Appeal of Intent to Merge Lot from Property f. Tax Assessor's Map g. Aerials CONC Michael Sciiubach Planning Director Kevin B. Northgraft City Manager 2 of appeal Owners Respubmitted, An•tew Pe ea Associate lanner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ON APPEAL THE MERGER OF LOTS COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1224 20TH PLACE. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on June 14, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following Findings: A. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of May 3, 1988, approved, on appeal from the property owner, the unmerger of the subject lots; B. Section 29.5-19 through 29.5-29 of the Zoning Ordinance perscribes the procedures for the merger of parcels; C. The City Council finds this parcel to. be consistent with the criteria for merger: 1. The main structure is sited on contiguous parcels. 2. Not more than 80% of the lots have been unmerged and. developed separately. 3. One of the contiguous parcels comprises less than 4000 square feet. 4. The contiguous parcels are held under common ownership. D. The parcel is legally described as lot 108 and 109, Redondo Home Tract. E. The merger of this parcel will preserve the character of the existing neighborhood by maintaining current densities and preserving public on -street parking; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve the merger of 1224 20th Place. 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 CONTINUED - Resolution No. 88 - PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY a/ccrsmerg 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 . 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ON APPEAL THE MERGER OF LOTS COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1254 20TH STREET. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on May 24, 1988 and June 14, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following Findings: A. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of April 5, 1988, approved, on appeal from the property owner, the unmerger of the subject lots; B. Section 29.5-19 through 29.5-29 of the Zoning Ordinance perscribes the procedures for the merger of parcels; C. The City. Council finds this parcel to be consistent with the criteria for merger: 1. The main structure is sited on contiguous parcels. 2. Not more than 80°h of the•lots have been unmerged and developed separately. 3. One of the contiguous parcels comprises less than 4000 square feet. 4. The contiguous parcels are held under common ownership. D. The parcel is legally described as lot 141 and 142, Redondo Home Tract. E. The merger of this parcel will preserve the character of the existing neighborhood by maintaining current densities and preserving public on -street parking; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve the merger of 1254 20th Street. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CONTINUED - Resolution No. 88 - PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY a/ccrsmerg 6 May 16, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council May 24,1988 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION NOT TO MERGE LOTS LOCATION/ 1254 20TH STREET OWNER: R. JANET HALLGREN, TRUST INITIATED BY MAYOR ETTA SIMPSON Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council merge the lots on appeal pursuant to Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-29 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of April 5, 1988, approved the appeal request not to merge the subject lots. Abstract The Planning Commission decision will allow the property owners to create substandard parcels rather than merging the lots as intended by the Lot Merger Ordinance. Analysis The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in LM 88-21 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. Staff finds these lots to be subject to merger since less than 80% of the block has been split and the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. The property owners were notified of the appeal by certified mail. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt the subject properties from being subject to merger. Additional background and analysis is provided in the attached Planning Commission staff report of April 5, 1988. (Note: the other property included in the staff report, 1224 20th Place, is scheduled for an appeal hearing before the City Council on June 14, 1988.) Attachments 1. Resolution No. 88- 2. PC staff reports of 4/5/88 3. PC minutes of 4/5/88 4. Background a. Letter from Mayor Simpson requesting appeal b. Letter to property owners with notification of appeal c. Lot Merger Letter 1 d. Intent to Merge Lot e. Appeal of Intent to Merge Lot from Property Owners f. Tax Assessor's Map g. Aerials CON UR - Michael Schu•ach Planning Director 'Kevin B. Northgraft City Manager Resp=ctf 11 'S •matted, An r'rPer Associate 7i anner Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 5 & 19, 1988) SUBJECT: GROUP: LOCATION: OWNER: LEGAL: REQUEST: LOT MERGER HEARING LM 88-2 20TH PLACE, 20TH STREET, PROSPECT AVENUE 1224 20TH PLACE CHAO-HSING PIAN 1905 CARNEGIE LANE REDONDO BEACH, CA 90278 April 28, 1988 Regular Meeting of May 3, 1988 19TH STREET EAST LOTS 108 AND 109 REDONDO HOME TRACT 4184006005 -ASSESSOR NO. TO MAINTAIN PARCELS AS TWO LOTS OF Recommendation To deny the applicants' request to maintain their parcel as two separate lots. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of April 5, 1988, continued this item per the applicant's request. LOT MERGER GROUP 88-2 -Notification of Intent to Merge Lots mailed on February 1, 1988 - Number of notification of Intent to Merge Lots mailed - 34 - Number of hearing requests for appeals received - 2 - Number of lots already developed on 25' parcels - 55% Analysis The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in LM 88-2 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. . c c Staff finds this lot to be subject to merger since less than 80% of the block has been split and the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. 1224 20th Place - The parcel is comprised of two 25' by 100' lots. Aerials indicate that the main structure staddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure is a single family dwelling. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt 1224 20th Place from being subject to merger. CONCUR: Michae "Sc u'ach Planning Director Attachments: 1. Lot Merger Letter 1 2. Intent to Merge Lots 3. Requests for appeals 4. Tax Assessor's Map 5. Aerial Andrew Pe'rea Associate Planner Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 5, 1988) SUBJECT: LOT MERGER HEARING GROUP: April 13, 1988 Regular Meeting of April 19, 1988 LM 88-2 20TH PLACE, 20TH STREET, 19TH STREET EAST OF PROSPECT AVENUE LOCATION: 1224 20TH PLACE OWNER: CHAO-HSING PIAN 1905 CARNEGIE LANE REDONDO BEACH, CA 90278 LEGAL: LOTS 108 AND 109 REDONDO HOME TRACT 4184006005 -ASSESSOR NO. REQUEST: TO MAINTAIN PARCELS AS TWO LOTS Recommendation To deny the applicants' request to maintain their parcel as two separate lots. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of April 5, 1988, continued this item per the applicant's request. LOT MERGER GROUP 88-2 - Notification of Intent to Merge Lots mailed on February 1, 1988 - Number of notification of Intent to Merge Lots mailed - 34 -Number of hearing requests for appeals received - 2 -Number of lots already developed on 25' parcels - 55% Analysis The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in LM 88-2 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. 11 • Staff finds thiCot to be subject to merg( since less than 80% ' of the block has been split and the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. 1224 20th Place - The parcel is comprised of two 25' by 100' lots. Aerials indicate that the main structure staddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure is a single family dwelling. Staff cannot determine any reasons to e being subject to merger. CONC Michael S hug`=ch Planning Dire tor Attachments: 1. Lot Merger Letter 1 2. Intent to Merge Lots 3. Requests for appeals 4. Tax Assessor's Map 5. Aerial pt 12,2' 20th Place from Ad:.j ' er Associate Planner ( c CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ANDREW PEREA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: *LOT MERGER 88-2 - REQUEST FOR HEARING DATE: APRIL 5, 1988 On Monday, April 4, 1988, staff received a call from Chao-Hsing Pian, owner of 1224 20th Street, requesting a continuance of a hearing regarding a determination of lot merger. Due to a conflict with her job, she will be unable to attend tonight's meeting. Staff is recommending that this matter be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of April 19, 1988. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1� -/3- c Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission SUBJECT: GROUP: LOCATION: APPEAL OF INTENT TO MERGE LM 88-2 20TH PLACE, 20TH STREET, AVENUE 1224 20TH PLACE OWNER: CHAO-HSING PIAN 1905 CARNEGIE LANE REDONDO BEACH, CA 90278 LEGAL: LOTS 108 AND 109 REDONDO HOME TRACT 4184006005 -ASSESSOR REQUEST: TO MAINTAIN PARCELS Recommendation c.- March 29, 1988 Regular Meeting of April 5, 1988 LOTS 19TH STREET EAST OF PROSPECT 1254 20TH STREET R. JANET HALLGREN, TRUST 1254 20TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 LOT 141 AND 142 REDONDO HOME TRACT NO. 4184007001 -ASSESSOR NO. AS TWO OR MORE LOTS To deny the applicants' request to maintain their parcel as two separate lots. Background LOT MERGER GROUP 88-2 -Notification of Intent to Merge Lots mailed on February 1, 1988 - Number of notification of Intent to Merge Lots mailed - 34 - Number of hearing requests for appeals received - 2 -Number of lots already developed on 25' parcels 20th Place - 55% 20th Street - 33% Analysis The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in LM 88-2 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. Staff finds these lots to be subject to merger since less than 80% .of the block has been split and the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. (7, 1224 20th Place - The parcel is comprised of two 25' by 100' lots. Aerials indicate that the main structure staddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure is a single family dwelling. 1254 20th Street - This parcel is comprised of slightly odd shaped lots of approximately 3000 square feet and 3080 square feet. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure is a single family dwelling. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt 1224 20th Place and 1254 20th Street from being subject tgmerge ichael Schu•ach Planning Director Attachments: 1. Lot Merger Letter 1 2. Intent to Merge Lots 3. Requests for appeals 4. Tax Assessor's Map 5. Aerial Andtew Associate Planner HEARING FOR DETERMINATION OF LOT MERGER GROUP L.M. 88-2 (CONTINUED FROM MEETING OF 4/19/88) Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated April 28, 1988. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of April 15, 1988, continued this matter at the request of the applicant. The matter was again continued from the meeting of April 19 because of the lateness of the hour. Mr. Schubach stated that the Planning Department has determined that the lots included in L.M. 88-2 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 25.5-19 through 29.5-28 and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. Mr. Schubach discussed 1224 20th Place and stated that this parcel is comprised of two 25 by 100 -foot lots. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure is a single-family dwelling. Staff could find no reason to exempt this parcel from being subject to the merger. Mr. Lough noted that the applicant was not present, and there has been no communication with the Planning Department on this matter. Comm. Ingell asked whether there have been any modifications to Code Section 29.5-19 through 29.5-28. He noted that that section says that if one does not want his property to be merged, it is necessary only to make that feeling known. Mr. Lough agreed that that was the case in the past; however, the City Council has adopted a new section that repeals the ability to act to unmerge. So if one meets all the mandatory requirements for merger, the lots must be merged. This new section will become effective in three weeks. Comm. Ingell stated that he would favor a continuance so that the applicant can be present at the hearing. P.C. Minutes 5/3/88 ailic54111 .. i :%ss.i. Chmn. Peirce noted that if action is taken on this matter now, the applicant would still have another chance to address the issue at the City Council level. Comm. Rue noted that no formal word has been received from the City Council in regard to the new section which becomes effective in three weeks. MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by Comm. Inge11, to approve the applicant's request to maintain the parcels as two separate lots on that grounds that the way the ordinance currently is written, it merely requires that notice be given by the applicant that he desires to maintain the lots separately. Chmn. Peirce stated that he has previously made his feelings known on this issue. Comm. Rue stated that, by his motion, he is in no way ignoring the density issue in the City. AYES: Comms. Ingell, Rue NOES: Chmn. Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comms. Compton, DeBellis P.C. Minutes 5/3/88 Chmn. Compton stated that the following items were continued to the next meeting of the Planning Commission: j • Hearing for determination for lot merger Group L.M. 88-2 • Staff Items • Commissioner Items MOTION by Chmn. Compton, seconded by Comm. Rue, to adjourn at 1:33 A.M. No objections; so ordered. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of Hermosa Beach at the regularly scheduled meeting of April 19, 1988. erald Compton, Chairman ichael Sdhubach, Secretary Date • -tg P.C. Minutes 4/19/88 1254 20th Street This parcel is comprised of two slightly odd -shaped lots of approximately 3000 square feet and 3080 square feet. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure is a single-family dwelling. Janet Hallgren, 1254 20th Street, Hermosa Beach, applicant, addressed the Commission and asked that her parcels not be merged. She has been a resident owner of this for nine years. She explained that she has two lots, one 25' by 125' and one 125' by 121'. These lots are unusually large and are on a corner. On her street, over 50 percent of the houses have been developed on 25' lots. The surrounding streets have almost completely been developed on 25' lots. She stated that her property value has dropped because of recent City rulings. She stated that there would be no loss of parking by development of her lot. She concluded by stating that these are very deep lots; and the corner lot would be extremely valuable to a developer. MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by Chmn. Compton, to not merge the lots at 1254 20th Street, based on the fact that the majority of homes in the immediate vicinity are on 25' lots; further, based on the fact that the owner has been a resident/owner for over 20 years in the City. AYES: Comms. DeBellis, Inge11, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: Comm. Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Ms. Wilma Burt stressed that these matters should be referred to as "hearings," not "appeals," stating that the word "appeal" has a specific meaning in law. Chmn. Compton suggested that in the future these matters be referred to as "hearings." P.C. Minutes 4/5/88 Tgarkgrouttb Olater.ials Citi o f2lermosaTeacly Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254.3885 City Clerk Midstokke City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear City Clerk Midstokke: I request to appeal to City Council the Planning Co sion decision not to merge the following property: Address: 1224 20th Place Legal Description: Lots 108 and 109 Redondo Home Tract Owner: Chao-Hsing Pian Mailing Address: 1905 Carnegie Lane Redondo Beach, CA 90278 Assessor No.: 4184006005 Sincerely, Etta Simps•n Mayor ES/ld \`'"1/ City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 3793312 / 376-6984 • Fire Department 376-2479 / 376-6984 • Police Department 376-7981 / 376-6984 —20— C C City of 21ermosaTeacfv . April 14, 1988 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90.54-3885 City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 OA - Dear City Clerk Midstokke: I request an appeal to the City Council from the decision to unmerge two (2) lots at 1254 - 20th Street, made by the Planning Commission on April 5, 1988. Sincerely, 4 ETTA SIMPSON Mayor 1p City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 379-3312 / 376-6984 • Fire Department 376-24791376.6984 • Police Department 376-7981 / 376-6984 • City of 2lermosarl3eacl. May 12, 1988 R. Janet Hallgren, Trust 1254 20th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 RE: Appeal. to the City Council of Hermosa Beach of Planning Commission decision - to not merge lots 141 and 142, Redondo Home Tract, commonly known as 1254 20th Street Dear Ms. Hallgren: An appeal of the Planning Commission decision on April 5, 1988 - not to merge the above mentioned lots - has been filed by Etta Simpson, Mayor of Hermosa Beach, and has been submitted to the City Clerk. A Public Hearing before the Hermosa Beach City Council has been set for May 24, 1988 at 8:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. This hearing will be held in the Council Chamber, City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive. If you wish any written evidence to be considered by the City Council at this meeting, we request that it reach the Planning Department by noon on Thursday, May 19, 1988 for inclusion in the City Council agenda packets. A staff report may be obtained on/or about May 19, 1988 from the Planning Department. If you have any questions regarding this matter please call (213)-376-6984. Sinc e1 An - 'e� a Associate •lanner City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 379-3312 / 376-6984 • –Fhb Department 376-2479 / 376-6984 • Police Department 376-7981 / 376.6984 —ZZ— March 24, 1988 cc c� City of 2lermosa 11eacL. Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Mr. Chao-Hsing Pian P.O. Box 2364 Redondo Beach, CA 90278 RE: Lot Merger - Request for Hearing 1224 20th Place Dear Mr. Pian: The Planning Department has received your request for a Hearing before the Planning Commission to determine if your lots should be merged pursuant to Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code and Section 66451.11-66451.21 of the State Government Code. The date of your hearing has been scheduled on April 5, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. in the Hermosa Beach Council Chambers, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach. You, or a representative agent, should be in attendance at the hearing to discuss your reasons for not beibg subject to the lot merger ordinance. If you have not already done so, you may provide in writing the reasons your lots are not subject to the merger ordinance. If there is a question as to whether the dwelling is located on contiguous lots then it may be necessary to provide a survey to determine location of the stucture and property lines. If you have any questions regarding this matter please call me at (213) 376-6984. Sincerely, AndrewPerea Associate manner City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 379.3312 / 376-6984 • Fire Department 376.2479 / 376-6984 • Police Department 376.7981 / 376.698 —23— February 24, 1988 Mr. Andrew Perea Associate Planner City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Calif. 90254 Dear Mr. Perea: Re: Proposed Merging of Lots I would like to request a hearing regarding the proposed merger of my lots, #141 and #142, at 1254 - 20th St., Hermosa Beach. There are a total of 26 houses on my block - of these two face Prospect, and have Prospect addresses, and one, opposite mine, faces Harper and has a Harper address. Of these 26 houses, 12 are built on 25 ft. frontage lots, and 11 are built on 50 ft. frontage lots - including mine, which is built on two 25 ft. frontage lots, as I assume the others are. The remaining 3 are the ones mentioned on the corners, each with 50 ft. frontage and 75 ft. (approx.) on the 20th St. side lot. Directly across from me (I am on the corner of Harper & 20th St.) on the Redondo side, almost ALL the houses are the "skinny" houses, with three having just been completed, and another two going up. On my own street, two of the existing "skinny" houses were built just last year, right around the time permits to build such houses were withdrawn. My point is that I am almost completely surrounded by the houses built on 25 foot lots, and over half the houses on my street, with 20th St. addresses, are on the 25 foot lots, and it seems strange that, since others have been allowed to do so, I should be penalized and told I cannot. As you know, this impacts considerably on my potential sale value of my house, as it is only a small two bedroom and den, 1 bath home. I am.totally self-supporting, and have been so for the last 20 years. I have raised two children - alone - and put them through college. It was my hope that I could retire within the next two or three years, and that I would be able to have two new houses built.on my lots, sell them, and use that as my retirement income. • FEB 25 \g88 -2 Your proposal to merge my lots would have a decidedly negative impact on my future plans, and I hope you will consider favorably my request to waive the merger of these lots. I might mention that my lots are particularly valuable from a building point of view, since one is on a corner, and both are deeper than usual - one is 25 X 125, and the other 25 X 121. As you are no doubt aware, most of the "skinny" houses are built on lots only 25 X 100, in Redondo, and sometimes on lots even smaller in Hermosa Beach. I look forward to hearing from you in this regard. ,Yours very truly, R.anet Hallgren 1254 - 20th St. Hermosa Beach, Calif. 90254 (Phone: 376-3232) • Chao-Hsing Pian P. 0. Box 2364 Redondo Beach, California 90278 February 29, 1988 Planning Department City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 To Whom It May Concern: I would like to schedule a hearing before the Planning Commission regarding to -the merger of lots 108 and 109, Redondo Home Tract (Assessor's No. 4184006005). The reasons I oppose the lot merger are based on the following reasons: 1. When I purchased the property (1224 20th Place, Hermosa Beach), lot size of 25' by 100' was legal, and there was not a 4,000 square foot minimum lot size requirement. 2. If I had known that there would be a law as stated in 1 above, I would not have purchased this property. Because that would be against my plan. My plan was to build two houses in adjacent to each other on these two lots, when I can financially afford it in the future. I would occupy one house, and my parents would occupy the other one. And, my plan has not been changed. 3. Merger of the lots would impose a huge financial hardship on me, the owner. 4. I do not believe in the taking of property rights of the homeowner. Sincerely yours, CZ!G Chao-Hsing Pian WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Hermosa Beach Planning Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 NOTICE OF INTENT TO MERGE LOTS Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach intends to determine if the following described lots are eligible for merger pursuant to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Sections 66451.11-66451.21. Assessor's No: 4184007001 Property Owner: R. JANET HALLGREN, TRUST 1254 20TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Legal Description: LOTS 141 AND 142 REDONDO HOME TRACT A Notice of the outcome of the decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission will be mailed to be recorded with the deeds of the above mentioned lots within 120 days of the date of this instrument. Questions regarding this matter may be addressed to the Hermosa Beach Planning Deparment at (213) 376-6984. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY \� ( C, .( Andrerea, Associate P1 nner DATE February 2, 1988 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On this 2nd day of February, 1988, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said county and state, personally appeared Andrew Peres, personally known to be the Associate Planner of the City of Hermosa Beach and known to me to be the person who executed the instrument on behalf of the City of Hermosa Beach and acknowledged to me that such City of Hermosa Beach executed the same. WITNESS y hand nd o ficial seal. Ib ccric,AL ;FAL. ,.-....;-:t. LO!S PE :. -K ._....) 't urn "Itil ILII•t14N1• .i r C LOS ANGELES COUNTY ' My Commission Expires Sept. 16, 1988 I1 SEAL (FREE RECORDING IS REQUESTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383 - BENEFITS CITY AND IS OFFICIAL CITY BUSINESS) Cr - cc WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Hermosa Beach Planning Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 NOTICE OF INTENT TO MERGE LOTS Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach intends to determine if the following described lots are eligible for merger pursuant to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Sections 66451.11-66451.21. Assessor's No: 4184006005 Property Owner: CHAO-HSING PIAN 1905 CARNEGIE LANE REDONDO BEACH CA. 90278 Legal Description: LOTS 108 AND 109 REDONDO HOME TRACT A Notice of the outcome of the decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission will be mailed to be recorded with the deeds of the above mentioned lots within 120 days of the date of this instrument. Questions regarding this matter may be addressed to the Hermosa Beach Planning Deparment at (213) 376-6984. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY Andr Pere Associate Planner DATE February 2, 1988 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On this 2nd day of February, 1988, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said 'county and state, personally appeared Andrew Perea, personally known to be the Associate Planner of the City of Hermosa Beach and known to me to be'the person who executed the instrument on behalf of the City of Hermosa Beach and acknowledged to me that such City of Hermosa Beach executed the same. WITNESS ,y hand .nd official seal. OFFICIAL SEAL i LOIS R. PEEK NQTON+ '•1R1.1r .:aN0gAMu LOS ANGELES COUNTY I My Commission Explres•Sept. 16, 1983 (FREE RECORDING IS REQUESTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383 - BENEFITS CITY AND IS OFFICIAL CITY BUSINESS) ouN • VIP \.K 411S4 •4, .11:› i ti= 5d WALTER RA i6ot I CO.'s RsboNbo ►+OME TRACT W1 Cs. A——t • ST. 19 40 W YLZE LAN E. • • 0 • •• • - , • .0 •••*•• 4.0 • 1i s i O t, • `4-""t' •/Att1:4 �' • 1 •..t • . 1t r i •..;,, v^� , 1,r :. .g.:. M+/ft ...• 1ti11K iV. •� t Easy' Reader Run Date: June 2,• 1988 DISPLAY Acct: 7010-2110 PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach shall hold a public bearing on June 14, 1988 to consider the following: 1. Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Negative Declaration for ticket sales at 727 Pacific Coast Highway, Music Plus (continued from 5/24/1988 meeting). ---=3P2. Appeal of Planning Commission•unmerging of lots located at•1254 20th • Street (continuted from 5/24/1988 meeting) and 1224.20th Place. SAID PUBLIC HEARING shall be at' 8:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chamber, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested are invited to participate at that time and place or to write to the City Council in care of the Planning and Environmental Services Department at the above address PRIOR to Thursday, June 9 1988 at 12:00 noon IF YOU CHALLENGE the above matter(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing. described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Department at, or prior to, the public hearing. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact the Planning Department at 376 -6984, - Ext. 242. _. Kevin Northcraft City Manager City of Hermosa Beach C Easy'Reader Run Date: May 12, 198$ Acct: 7010-2110 . DISPLAY • PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beac shall hold a public bearing on May 24, 1988 to consider tt following: 1. Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Negative Declaration for ticket sales at 727 Pacific Coast Highway, Music Plus. 2. Rezone of area 9 from R-2 and R-3 to R-1 or to such other zone as deemed appropriate ..by City Council and adopt an Environmental Negative Declaratio, 3, Approval of Commuter Transportation Implementation'Plan to serve commuters bound for the El Segundo Employment Center .sponsored by the Cities of Hermos Beach, Redondo Beach, Rancho Palos Verdes, Torrance, El Segundo, Lawndale, Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission. ---?> 4. Appeal of Planning Commission unmerging of lots located at 1254 20th Street *Map on file in Planning Department in City Hall. SAID PUBLIC HEARING shall be at" 8:00 P.M. in the City Hall Counci: Chamber, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested are invited to participate at that time anc place or to write to the City Council in care of the Planning anc Environmental Services Department at the above address PRIOR to' May 19, 1988 at 12:00 noon . IF YOU CHALLENGE the above matter(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing describec in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Department at, or prior to, the public hearing. . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact the Planning Department at 376-6984, Ext. 242. Kevin Northcraft City Manager City of Hermosa Beach May 16, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council May 24,1988 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION NOT TO MERGE LOTS LOCATION/ 1254 20TH STREET OWNER: R. JANET HALLGREN, TRUST INITIATED BY MAYOR ETTA SIMPSON Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council merge the lots on appeal pursuant to Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-29 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of April 5, 1988, approved the appeal request not to merge the subject lots. Abstract The Planning Commission decision will allow the property owners to create substandard parcels rather than merging the lots as intended by the Lot Merger Ordinance. Analysis The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in LM 88-21 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. Staff finds these lots to be subject to merger since less than 80% of the block has been split and the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. The property owners were notified of the appeal by certified mail. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt the subject properties from being subject to merger. Additional background and analysis is provided in the attached Planning Commission staff report of April 5, 1988. (Note: the other property included in the staff report, 1224 20th Place, is scheduled for an appeal hearing before the City Council on June 14, 1988.) 1 Attachments 1. Resolution No. 88- 2. PC staff reports of 4/5/88 3. PC minutes of 4/5/88 4. Background a. Letter from Mayor Simpson requesting appeal b. Letter to property owners with notification of appeal c. Lot Merger Letter 1 d. Intent to Merge Lot e. Appeal of Intent to Merge Lot from Property Owners f. Tax Assessor's Map g. Aerials CON Michael Sc"u•ach Planning Director —7' e7 -ems-. 'Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 2 Associate 7► anner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ON APPEAL THE MERGER OF LOTS COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1254 20TH STREET. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on May 24, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following Findings: A. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of April 5, 1988, approved, on appeal from the property owner, the unmerger of the subject lotsi B. Section 29.5-19 through 29.5-29 of the Zoning Ordinance perscribes the procedures for the merger of parcels; C. The City Council finds this parcel to be consistent with the criteria for merger: 1. The main structure is sited on contiguous parcels. 2. Not more than 80% of the lots have been unmerged and developed separately. 3. One of the contiguous parcels comprises less than 4000 square feet. 4. The contiguous °parcels are held under common ownership. D. The parcel is legally described as lot 141 and 142, Redondo Home Tract. E. The merger of this parcel will preserve the character of the existing neighborhood by maintaining current densities and preserving public on -street parking; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve the merger of 1254 20th Street. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CONTINUED - Resolution No. 88 - PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of May, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: Cara CITY ATTORNEY a/ccrsmerg 4 4ti Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission SUBJECT: GROUP: LOCATION: APPEAL OF INTENT TO MERGE LM 88-2 20TH PLACE, 20TH AVENUE 1224 20TH PLACE STREET, OWNER: CHAO-HSING PIAN 1905 CARNEGIE LANE REDONDO BEACH, CA 90278 LEGAL: LOTS 108 AND 109 REDONDO HOME TRACT March 29, 1988 Regular Meeting of April 5, 1988 LOTS 19TH STREET EAST OF PROSPECT 1254 20TH STREET R. JANET HALLGREN, TRUST 1254 20TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 LOT 141 AND 142 REDONDO HOME TRACT 4184006005 -ASSESSOR NO. 4184007001 -ASSESSOR NO. REQUEST: TO MAINTAIN PARCELS AS TWO OR MORE LOTS Recommendation To deny the applicants' request to maintain their parcel as two separate lots. Background LOT MERGER GROUP 88-2 - Notification of Intent to Merge Lots mailed on February 1, 1988 -Number of notification of Intent to Merge Lots mailed - 34 - Number of hearing requests for appeals received 2 - Number of lots already developed on 25' parcels 20th Place - 557e 20th Street - 3370 Analysis The Planning Department has determined that the lots included in LM 88-2 are subject to merger pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Section 66451.11-66451.21. Staff finds these lots to be subject to merger since less than 807. of the block has been split and the contiguous parcels are held by the same owner. ori 1224 20th Place - The parcel is comprised of two 25' by 100' lots. Aerials indicate that the main structure staddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure is a single family dwelling. 1254 20th Street - This parcel is comprised of slightly odd shaped lots of approximately 3000 square feet and 3080 square feet. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure is a single family dwelling. Staff cannot determine any reasons to exempt 1224 20th Place and 1254 20th Street from being subject t¢merge 000R ), ch'ael Schu . ach Planning Director Attachments: 1. Lot Merger Letter 1 2. Intent to Merge Lots 3. Requests for appeals 4. Tax Assessor's Map 5. Aerial Andrew P ea Associate Planner Comm. DeBellis asked whether there were any legal problems with continuing this item. Mr. Lough replied in the negative. MOTION by Chmn. Compton, seconded by Comm. Peirce, to continue the hearing of 1224 20th Street, to the next meeting of the Planning Commission. No objections; so ordered. 1254 20th Street This parcel is comprised of two slightly odd -shaped lots of approximately 3000 square feet and 3080 square feet. Aerials indicate that the main structure straddles the property line. Building records indicate this structure is a single-family dwelling. Janet Hallgren, 1254 20th Street, Hermosa Beach, applicant, addressed the Commission and asked that her parcels not be merged. She has been a resident owner of this for nine years. She explained that she has two lots, one 25' by 125' and one 125' by 121'. These lots are unusually large and are on'a corner. On her street, over 50 percent of the houses have been developed on 25' lots. The surrounding streets have almost completely been developed on 25' lots. She stated that her property value has dropped because of recent City rulings. She stated that there would be no loss of parking by development of her lot. She concluded by stating that these are very deep lots; and the corner lot 'would be extremely valuable to a developer. MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by Chmn. Compton, to not merge the lots at 1254 20th Street, based on the fact that the majority of homes in the immediate vicinity are on 25' lots; further, based on the fact that the owner has been a resident/owner for over 20 years in the City. AYES: Comms. DeBellis, Inge11, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: Comm. Peirce ABSTAIN:. None ABSENT: None Ms. Wilma Burt stressed that these matters should be referred to as "hearings," not "appeals," stating that the word "appeal" has a specific meaning in law. Chmn. Compton suggested that in the future these matters be referred to as "hearings." P.C. Minutes 4/5/88 Ett,thgrituttit April 14, 1988 City of 2lermosa 13eacL Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90 54-3885 City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear City Clerk Midstokke: OA - I request an appeal to the City Council from the decision to unmerge two (2) lots at 1254 - 20th Street made by the Planning Commission on April 5, 1988. Sincerely, 4 • ETTA SIMPSON Mayor 1p City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 379-3312 / 376-6984 • Fire Department 376-2479 / 376-6984 • Police Department 376-7981 / 376.6984 _8_ ' City of 21ermosa l�eacly _x. • 4 May 12, 1988 R. Janet Hallgren, Trust 1254 20th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 RE: Appeal to the City Council of Hermosa Beach of Planning Commission decision -,to not merge lots 141 and 142, Redondo Home Tract, commonly known as 1254 20th Street Dear Ms. Hallgren: An appeal of the Planning Commission decision on April 5, 1988 - not to merge the above mentioned lots - has been filed by Etta Simpson, Mayor of Hermosa Beach, and has been submitted to the City Clerk. A Public Hearing before the Hermosa Beach City Council has been set for May 24, 1988 at 8:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. This hearing will be held in the Council Chamber, City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive. If you wish any written evidence to be considered by the City Council at this meeting, we request that it reach the Planning Department by noon on Thursday, May 19, 1988 for inclusion in the City Council agenda packets. A staff report may be obtained on/or about May 19, 1988 from the Planning Department. If you have any questions regarding this matter please call (213) 376-6984. City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 379-3312 / 376-6984 • —Fir/ Department 376.2479 / 376-6984 • Police Department 376-7981 / 376-6984 March 24, 1988 Ms. R. Janet Hallgren 1254 20th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (r. City o Hermosa TBeach Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 RE: Lot Merger - Request for Hearing 1254 20th Street Dear Ms. Hallgren: The Planning Department has received your request for a Hearing before the Planning Commission to determine if your lots should be merged pursuant to Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code and Section 66451.11-66451.21 of the State Government Code. The date of your hearing has been scheduled on April 5, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. in the Hermosa Beach Council Chambers, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach. You, or a representative agent, should be in attendance at the hearing to discuss your reasons for not being subject to the lot merger ordinance. If you have not already done so, you may provide in writing the reasons your lots are not subject to the merger ordinance. If there is a question as to whether the dwelling is located on contiguous lots then it may be necessary to provide a survey to determine location of the stucture and property lines. If you have any questions regarding this matter please call me at (213) 376-6984. Si merely, An•rew '- ea Associate Planner City Hall (213) 376-6984 • Community Center 379.3312 / 376-6984 • Fire Department 376.2479 / 376=6984 • Police Department 376-7981 1376.698, —10— WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Hermosa Beach Planning Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 NOTICE OF INTENT TO MERGE LOTS Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach intends to determine if the following described lots are eligible for merger pursuant to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 29.5-19 through 29.5-28 (LOT MERGER ORDINANCE) and State Government Code Sections 66451.11-66451.21. Assessor's No: 4184007001 Property Owner: R. JANET HALLGREN, TRUST 1254 20TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Legal Description: LOTS 141 AND 142 REDONDO HOME TRACT A Notice of the outcome of the decision of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission will be mailed to be recorded with the deeds of the above mentioned lots within 120 days of the date of this instrument. Questions regarding this matter may be addressed to the Hermosa Beach Planning Deparment at (213) 376-6984. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY �( C,.� ,\f / DATE February 2, 1988 Andrerea Associate P1nner STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On this 2nd day of February, 1988, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said county and state, personally appeared Andrew Peres, personally known to be the Associate Planner of the City of Hermosa Beach and known to me to be the person who executed the instrument on behalf of the City of Hermosa Beach and acknowledged to me that such City of Hermosa Beach executed the same. WITNESS y hand nd o ictal seal. it ocric:Ai :FA LOIS R. EE ii ••`.. _ i�w NQTAi+. .: 11M L11 ..wl ..t.9N/. LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Commission Expires Sept, 16, 1988 SEAL (FREE RECORDING IS REQUESTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383 - BENEFITS CITY AND IS OFFICIAL CITY BUSINESS) (b ( February 24, 1988 Mr. Andrew Perea Associate Planner City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Calif. 90254 Dear Mr. Perea: Re: Proposed Merging of Lots I would like to request a hearing regarding the proposed merger of my lots, #141 and #142, at 1254 - 20th St., Hermosa Beach. There are a total of 26 houses on my block - of these two face Prospect, and have Prospect addresses, and one, opposite mine, faces Harper and has a Harper address. Of these 26 houses, 12 are built on 25 ft. frontage lots, and 11 are built on 50 ft. frontage lots - including mine, which is built on two 25 ft. frontage lots, as I assume the others are. The remaining 3 are the ones mentioned on the corners, each with 50 ft. frontage and 75 ft. (approx.) on the 20th St. side lot. Directly across from me (I am on the corner of Harper & 20th St.) on the Redondo side, almost ALL the houses are the "skinny" houses, with three having just been completed, and another two going up. On my .own street, two of the existing "skinny" houses were built just last year, right around the time permits to build such houses were withdrawn. My point is that I am almost completely surrounded by the houses built on 25 foot lots, and over half the houses on my street, with 20th St. addresses, are on the 25 foot lots, and it seems strange that, since others have been allowed to do so, I should be penalized and told I cannot. As you know, this impacts considerably on my potential sale value of my house, as it is only a small two bedroom and den, 1 bath home. I amtotally self-supporting, and have been so for the last 20 years. I have raised two children - alone - and put them through college. It was my hope that I could retire within the next two or three years, and that I would be able to have two new houses built on my lots, sell them, and use that as my retirement income. FEB 25 1988 -2 Your proposal to merge my lots would have a decidedly negative impact on my future plans, and I hope you will consider favorably my request to waive the merger of these lots. I might mention that my lots are particularly valuable from a building point of view, since one is on a corner, and both are deeper than usual - one is 25 X 125, and the other 25 X 121. As you are no doubt aware, most of the "skinny" houses are built on lots only 25 X 100, in Redondo, and sometimes on lots even smaller in Hermosa Beath. I look forward to hearing from you in this regard. Yours very truly, R. Janet Hallgren 1254 - 20th St. Hermosa Beach, Calif. 90254 (Phone: 376-3232) • • IL • 0 : L.sl• 'VDT ik.l3e. 7 . Ili =se 6 '1••• . 4, • ilytti ,• s. • (41 • 1ebot044 B. q ;Al TRACT WALTER RANSOM CO'S " I 1 / le zr • 44 !ByV. v Easy' Reader Run Date: May 12, 1988 Acct: 7010-2110 • . DISPLAY • PUBLIC NOTICE • NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Bea( following: shall hold a public hearing on May 24, 1888 to consider tt 1. Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Negative Declaration for ticket sales at 727 Pacific Coast Highway, Music Plus. 2. Rezone of area 9 from R-2 and R-3 to R-1 or to such other zone as deemed appropriate by City Council and adopt an Environmental Negative Declaratio 3, Approval of Commuter Transportation Implementation Plan to serve commuters bound for the El Segundo Employment Center sponsored by the Cities of Hermos Beach, Redondo Beach, Rancho Palos Verdes, Torrance, El Segundo, Lawndale, Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission: 4. Appeal of Planning Commission unmerging of lots located at 1254 20th Street *Map on file in Planning Department in City Hall. SAID PUBLIC HEARING shall be at .8:00 P.M. in the City Hall Counci: Chamber, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested are invited to participate at that time an( place or to write to the City Council in care of the Planning an( Environmental Services Department at the above address PRIOR to' May 19, 1988 at 12:00 noon IF YOU CHALLENGE the above matter(s) in court, you may be limited to raisin€ only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing describes in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Plannin€ Department at, or prior to, the public hearing. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact the Planning Department at 376-6984, Ext. 242. Kevin Northcraft City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 711-hz--41/—/•&, r4-9"" /se, LA As= /S June 9, 1988 /0 —/%-‘-, Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council June 14, 1988 SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR C.U.P. 88-2 LOCATION: MUSIC PLUS, 727 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY APPLICANT: GERRY COHEN REQUEST: TO ALLOW SALE OF SPECIAL EVENT TICKETS Recommendation Based on the concerns of the applicant, the staff is recommending that the City Countil take the following action: 1. Discuss the Conditional Use Permit in conjunction with the precise plan and zone change which are also on the agenda. 2. Consider the applicants request to allow the parking lot's hours of operation to be in the Conditional Use Permit instead of the precise plan as it is currently. 3. If the City Council determines that the applicant's request should be given consideration', then, direct staff to set for publicly hearing consideration of an amendment to the precise plan and Conditional Use Permit, and to prepare a staff. analysis. 4. Withhold final reading of the zone change until this matter is settled. Analysis The applicant's desire to place the parking lot's hours of operation in the Conditional Use Permit instead of the precise plan is a result of the Bank's demands in conjunction with financing the project. CONCUR: -Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager T/ccsr727 1 sp ully = u i tte c :el Sc u'ac Planning Director l May 17, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council May 24, 1988 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 88-2 LOCATION: MUSIC PLUS 727 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK A, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT APPLICANT: GERRY COHEN 1429 4TH STREET SANTA MONICA, CA 90401 REQUEST: TO ALLOW THE SALE OF SPECIAL EVENT TICKETS Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council grant minutes approval to the attached Conditional Use Permit, and discuss this matter in conjunction with the precise plan and zone change which final approval has been postponed until this meeting. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of April 19, 1988, recommended that the City Council approve a Conditional Use Permit for the sale of special event tickets. Abstract The approval of a conditional use permit for ticket sales will allow staff to place conditions on the buisiness establishment which would mitigate any problems associated with ticket sales. Music Plus currently sells sPecial event tickets without a C.U.P. Analysis As a condition of approval for the C.U.P., the Plannning Commission recommended that the C.U.P. be subject to approval from City Council since the applicant has also applied for a zone change and precise plan at 720 8th Street. Additional background information and analysis is provided in the Planning Commission staff report of April 19, 1988. Attachments 1. Resolution P.C. 88-33 2. P.C. Staff Report of 4/19/88 3. Background 1. P.C. Minutes of 4/19/88 2. Police Report 3. Staff Review Minutes of 4/7/88 4. Application 5. Public Notice Affadivit 727 Pacific Coast Highway - Continued Michael Sc Plannine Director Kevin B. No ' craft City Manager An rew Pere Associate P1'nner X 6• 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 88-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF SPECIAL EVENT TICKETS AT MUSIC PLUS, 727 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK A, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT AND APPROVAL OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 19, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following Findings; A. The site is presently selling special event tickets without the benefits of a conditional use permit. B. Requirement of a conditional use permit and the imposition of conditions will mitigate any problems that may arise in conjunction with said use; C. The existing building is not being expanded or altered. D. This use is consistant with the zoning ordinance and General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Music Plus, 727 Pacific Coast Highway, legally ..described as Lots 1 and 2, Block A, Redondo Hermosa Tract, and approve a Negative Declaration subject to the following conditions: 1. Ticket sales shall be prohibited prior to 11:00 a.m. daily for special events, or other acceptable methods to eliminate overnight camping, loitering, or similar behavior of patrons shall be provided subject to approval by the Planning Director. 2. Regular event, low demand tickets sales may commence at 10:00 unless complaints are received 3. Signs shall be placed clearly stating "No loitering, camping, or trespassing." 4. The owner shall obtain a business license for the ticket sales. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5. A manager or clerk who is aware of conditions of the conditional use permit shall be on the premises during business hours. a. Each manager shall be given a copy of the conditional • use permit and shall acknowledge by signiture that the conditional use permit has been read and understood. 6. The exterior of the premises including parking areas shall be maintained in a neat and clear manner at all times. 7. Any changes to the interior layout which leads to significant enhancement of ticket sales shall require that the Planning Director be noticed. 8. Additional conditions may be imposed if problems arise, such as loitering and overnight camping. 9. Prior to the conditional use permit being in effect, the application shall submit to the Planning Department a signed and notarized "Acceptance of Conditions" form. 10. This conditional use permit shall be subject to approval by the City Council. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Ingell,Peirce,Rue,Compton NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm.DeBellis CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 88-33 is a true flp4 complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commis, on f the City of Hermosa Beach, Californyt at their gulag eetinglif April 19, 1988. eral Compton, Chairman Mic ea -1 Sc ubach, Secretary Date E ttOkgr uu it b P.O. BOX 58900 2551 SOUTH ALAMEDA STREET LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90058 (213) 234-3336 TWX 910-321-2947 16 May 1988 Honorable Mayor Etta Simpson and City Council Members Mr. Roger Creighton Mr. Jim Rosenbeyer Mr. Chuck Sheldon Ms. June Williams City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Music Plus Hermosa Beach Dear Mayor Simpson and Council Members, As you know, we will be meeting in a couple of weeks to conclude our request for the zone change to allow additional parking. It seems that over the past several months, we have resolved many issues related to our doing business at the corner of 8th and Pacific Coast Highway. We have resolved the ticket line problem, and have resolved the maintenance question. Thus, we have begun the process of improving our relationship with our surrounding neighbors. There are a few issues yet unresolved. These issues are addressed in Mr. Gerry Cohen's letter to Mr. Michael Schubach, dated February 23, 1988, which I have enclosed. Gerry addresses our attempts to discuss ameliorating one particular neighbor's difficulties. While we knew we were putting ourselves in somewhat of a precarious position by approaching her (to begin discussions of how we may help her position), we never expected an escalating list of demands and a public announcement of those discussions. We have decided against offering any monetary adjustment or otherwise, and have notified her of this, in writing. today. We fully expect her to be unhappy with our decision, and expect the worst at our hearing with you. Page 2 16 May 1988 Honorable Mayor Etta Simpson and City Council Members Council has already determined, the additional parking is consistent with the general plan and will bring benefits to the community. We have been happy to accomodate all of Council's and the Planning Commission's many conditions. The addition of many trees and landscaping, with proper upkeep, will certainly improve its present appearance. The rolling security gates and lighting will completely resolve the problem of vagrants, etc. using our lot after hours. The additional parking, will pull those customers off the street who, now, are forced to drive the area searching for parking, dramatically improving the present status. The unresolved issue, then, is the "hours of operation" restriction, and this, indeed, must be resolved. 4• As Gerry indicates, we need the income generated from our current hours of operation, (10:00 pm Sunday thru Thursday, and up to 11:00 pm Friday, Saturday, and for the month beginning December 15 thru January 15 each year),_ to help pay for the project. The orolect becomes economically unfeasible with this restriction. and we will be forced to give—up our request for the zone change. Should council wish to hold us to our current operating hours, (not allowing us to increase our current hours of operation from the above), Music Plus would be willing to comply, but ask that this restriction is placed with the C.U.P., not the precise plan. We greatly appreciate all of the council members and city staff's time and efforts to try and work out our request. We hope you will consider the items mentioned in this letter and Gerry's, and look forward to seeing you May 24th. Thank you, again. Sincerely, rk Wesley MW:10 cc: Mr. Gerry Cohen Mr. Lou Fogelman 6 • COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE — S4LES, SITE SELECTION AND LEASE NEGOTIATIONS FOR CHAIN STORES AND OTHERS February 23, 1988 Mr. Michael Schubach Hermosa Beach City Hall City Planning Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 RE: PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE TO 720 8TH STREET AND -, RESTRICTIONS ON HOURS OF OPERATION OF THE PARKING LOT Dear Michael, • 1429 4TH STREET SANTA MONICA CALIFORNIA 90401.2393 (213) 451.6171 FAX (213) 395 6361 The petitioner's desire at this point is to construct a parking lot which will be. open to customers up to ten o'clock P.M. Sundays thru Thursday, and up to eleven o'clock P.M. Fridays, Saturdays, and for the month beginning December 15 thru January 15 each year. These are the hours of operation the tenant, Music Plus, has been operating for the past eight years. Recent council action, if enacted, would require the parking lot to close at ten o'clock P.M. each day, negatively impacting the tenant's ability to service customers and create sales tax dollars. In addition, these restrictions are to be put on the fee interest thru the precise plan, rather than on the user of the property, Music Plus, through a C.U.P. At council's suggestion at the January 12th meeting, we entered into discussions with a neighbor who has claimed substantial negative impact to her property and lifestyle due to the. proposed parking lot, with the intent of finding ways to ameliorate her difficulties. While we are optimistic about creating a satisfactory situation for her, we are still in discussion and are unsure of the outcome. The petitioners find themselves facing the prospect of the Tenant's decreasing hours of available parking for customers (won't this result in increased street traffic?) in order to attempt to alleviate a parking problem, which is an unacceptable position. In addition, the restriction placed in the precise plan, rather than in a C.U.P., places restrictions on the fee which are commercially unreasonable in light of current mortgage and investment practice. SAVE THE PIER & PAY COMMISSIONS PROMPTLY FOUNDING MEM$L1 Of CHAIN LINKS 01114W ,<StEirt =4,0,==. 7 - OFFICES IN SAN DIEGO (619) 544-1449 SAN FRANCISCO (415) 673-100C Mr. Michael Schubach Page Two February 23, 1988 We will, therefore, ask council 1) to allow the construction of the parking lot with hours of operation as noted above, 2) to place the restriction in a C.U.P. and not in the precise plan and 3) to make the zoning change process and C.U.P. process concurrent for orderly administration and protection of all the parties interests. Please call me with any comments or questions you may have. GC/sl cc: Lou Fogelman Terry Pringle Michael L. Epsteen Alex Byer 7 4- 1 ( C April 11, 1988 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission April 19, 1988 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 88-2 LOCATION: APPLICANT: REQUEST: MUSIC PLUS 727 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK A, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT GERRY COHEN 1429 4TH STREET SANTA MONICA, CA 90401 TO ALLOW THE SALE OF SPECIAL EVENT TICKETS Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a Conditional Use Permit subject to the conditions listed in the attached resolution. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of November 4, 1987, recommended the City Council approve a zone change and precise plan to allow a parking lot at 720 8th Street. The City Council approved the zone change and precise plan with added conditions of approval. The applicant has requested the second reading of this matter be continued until the applicant has had an opportunity to apply for the conditional use permit for the ticket sales. The City Council, at their meeting of February 23, 1988, approved Ordinance 88-916 requiring a CUP for ticket sales. The Staff Review Committee, at their meeting of April 7, 1988, recommended a Negative Declaration for this project and recommeded that this CUP be subject to approval from the City Council in conjunction with the zone change and precise plan for 720 8th Street. Analysis The applicant is currently selling special event tickets without a Conditional Use Permit. At the public hearing for the zone change and precise plan, nearby residents raised issues of problems associated with the ticket sales. These out" included loitering and noise from patrons "camping out' in an attempt to obtain choice seats. c Music Plus has initiated a policy not to sell special event tickets until 11:00 a.m. The other Music Plus stores in the area open their ticket outlets at 10:00 a.m. Therefore, the patrons attempting to obtain choice seats at special events will line up in the other stores. Police records indicate only one call has been received since the inception of the change in ticket sales hours. The call was made by the Music Plus management regarding a customer dispute. The management has also been working with nearby residents to resolve their concerns. The store is presently open from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. The ticket outlet is open from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. The Precise Plan, as approved by the City Council, will require the lights in the parking lot to be turned off at 10:00 p.m. and the parking lot to be secured. The applicant would like to amend their Precise Plan to allow the,proposed parking lot to be open until 11:00 p.m. There will be no changes to the existing layout of the store. As a condition of approval, staff is recommending that the Conditional Use Permit be subject to approval by the Planning Commission in conjunction with their zone change and precise plan. Also staff recommends the Planning Commission require a business license for the ticket sales. The approval of thea conditional use permit will give staff the ability to place conditions upon the business which could mitigate any potential problems associated with the use. Mi&�hael S huba Planning Direc Andrew Per a Associate lanner if 0 Ifige, r s 7- °° APPS. 4-4988 fuw ., CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR TICKET SALES AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 727 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY — MUSIC PLUS Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated April 11, 1988. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of November 4, 1987, recommended that the City Council approve a zone change and precise plan to allow a parking lot at 720 8th Street. The City Council approved the zone change and precise plan with added conditions of approval. The applicant has requested the second reading of this matter be continued until the applicant has had an opportunity to apply for the conditional use permit for the ticket sales. The City Council, at their meeting of February 23, 1988, approved Ordinance No. 88-916 requiring a conditional use permit for ticket sales. The staff review committee, at their meeting of April 7, 1988, recommended a negative declaration for this project and recommended that this conditional use permit be subject to approval from the City Council in conjunction with the zone change and precise plan for 720 8th Street. The applicant is currently selling special event tickets without a conditional use permit. At the public hearing for the zone change and precise plan, nearby residents raised issues of problems associated with the ticket sales. These problems included loitering and noise from patrons "camping out" in an attempt to obtain choice seats. Music Plus has initiated a policy not to sell special event tickets until 11:00 A.M. The other Music Plus stores in the area open their ticket outlets at 10:00 A.M. Therefore, the patrons attempting to obtain choice seats at special events will line up in the other stores. Police records indicate only one call has been received since the inception of the change in ticket sale hours. The call was made by the Music Plus management regarding a customer dispute. The management has also been working with nearby residents to resolve their concerns. The store is presently open from 10:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M. The ticket outlet is open from 11:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M. The precise plan, as approved by the City Council, will require the lights in the parking lot to be turned off at 10:00 P.M. and the parking lot to be secured. The applicant would like to amend the precise plan to allow the proposed parking lot to be open until 11:00 P.M. There will be no changes to the existing layout of the store. As a condition of approval, staff is recommending that the conditional use permit be subject to approval by the Planning Commission in conjunction with their zone change and precise plan. Also, staff recommends the Planning Commission require a business license for the ticket sales. The approval of the conditional use permit will give staff the ability to place conditions upon the business which could mitigate any potential problems associated with the use. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission grant the conditional use permit subject to the conditions specified in the resolution. Public Hearing opened at 11:50 P.M. by Chmn. Compton. —11— P.C. Minutes 4/19/88 Mark Westley, 3324 Colorado,_ Long Beach, and Jerry Cohen, 1429 4th Street, Santa Monica, representing_ Music Plus, addressed the Commission. They drew the Commission's attention to Condition No. 7 which states: "Any changes to the interior layout shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director." Mr. Westley felt that such a condition would be far too restrictive as far as his ability to run the store, stating that it would be necessary for him to obtain approval every time he desires to change or remodel the store.. He said that this appears to be a new condition whichhas been added, and he could not understand how such a condition could add to the effectiveness of the control of ticket sales. Mr. Westley asked for clarification on the intent of the City in regard to this proposed Condition No. 7. Mr. Schubach stated that condition is typically imposed in conditional use permits. In this case the the City would not want the applicant to suddenly become a major ticket distributor. Also, this condition would preclude future potential problems with the layout arrangement of the store. Mr. Cohen noted that Condition No. 8 states: "Additional conditions may be imposed if problems arise, such . as loitering and overnight camping." He felt that that condition could be referenced if there were to be any problems with ticket sales or the' layout of the store. This condition would give the City the ongoing authority to oversee conditions at Music Plus. Mr. Cohen. stressed that the City has various other means of operational control, other than the imposition of a condition dictating the layout of the store as addressed in Condition No. 7. He stated that the face of the language seems to dictate any changes in the layout of the store; therefore, they object to the wording of .the. condition. Mr. Lough suggested a modification to Condition No. 7 stating that "any changes to the interior of the layout which lead to a significant increase in the floor area for ticket sales..." Mr. Westley stated that they should be able to add terminals in the store without approval every time an addition is made so long as there are no problems. If there are problems, the City has the authority to take action. Comm. Peirce noted concern that many terminals might be installed, noting that the Commission thought this establishment was only going to be a small ticket outlet. Mr. Westley stated that all of the restrictions seem to be overbearing and unnecessary. He stated that the possibility of this establishment turning into a huge ticket outlet is highly unlikely. He stated that the attempt of the City to cover itself before such an occurrence grossly restricts his ability to change fixtures or lean more towards videos and other changes. He felt that the entire purpose of the CUP was to give the City control over the way in which tickets are sold. Comm. Peirce asked why the applicant objected to the City's attempt to maintain the size of the ticket sales to what it currently is. Mr. Westley felt that the City does not have such a right. If he can conduct the business with no problems, he should be allowed to carry on business. He stated that he is providing a community service. He agreed if the ticket sales are tripled, he could see — -12— P.C. Minutes 4/19/88 the addition of more conditions; however, to try to tie that condition in at this time is inappropriate. He noted that every single Music Plus store has only one ticket terminal per store.. Mr. Westley stated that the problems concerned with the long lines for ticket sales have been resolved. He felt that things are being carried too far by the imposition of these conditions. Chmn. Compton stated that if all the stores have only one terminal, the applicant should have no objection to a condition stating that any significant changes which lead to increased tickets sales shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. Comm. Rue disagreed, stating that additional ticket sales might not be detrimental to the public welfare. Comm. Ingell agreed with Comm. Rue, stating that the applicant's ability to merchandise could be limited by such a conditiop. Chmn. Compton stated that his comments regard only ticket sales, not videos or any other merchandise. No other layout changes would be included. Mr. Cohen stated that if increased ticket sales can be accomplished without negatively impacting the surrounding neighborhood, the applicant should be able to do so without the imposition of said condition. He stated that this would be good business practice. He stressed that the City has the right to come in if there are problems. Chmn. Compton stated that any modification which would lead to enhanced ticket sales could lead to potential problems that the applicant is not now aware of. If the City does not know that such enhancements are being done they will . not be able to oversee the operation. He stated that he would prefer that the condition be included in order to avoid future problems and complaints from the neighbors. He felt that the Planning Director would be amenable, and would not necessarily require every item to come before the Planning Commission. Mr. Westley asked if the Commission would be amenable to changing the condition to state that the applicant shall give notice to the Planning Director, as opposed to being required to ask for approval. Comm. Ingell felt that Condition No. 8 is adequate if there are problems. He felt that the applicant, as a businessman, has the right to conduct his business. He felt that the neighbors will definitely let the Planning Commission know if there are problems. Further, he felt that the applicant might be better able to serve customers if additional terminals are added. Mr. Lough agreed that the wording in Condition No. 7 is overly broad. He stated that this is a standard condition imposed to ensure that whatever the reason was for the conditional use permit being required is not causing problems. He felt that better wording would be something such as "Any changes to the interior layout which substantially increases the use of floor area for the purpose of ticket sales shall be subject to review by the Planning Director." He noted, however, that problems could arise in determining exactly what would constitute a "substantial increase." He suggested that the Planning Department be notified by the applicant when there is a modification to the amount of ticket sales. He noted that the City does now have a full- time CUP enforcement officer. He noted that there are merely suggestions for the • 13-- P.C. Minutes 4/19/88 Planning Commission to discuss. Mr. Lough did note that if the CUP is approved, Condition No. 7 should be modified in order to avoid ambiguities. Comm. Inge11 felt that. the applicant can probably run his business better than the Commission can. Whether the ticket sales are increased or not would not create a problem so long as people are kept from camping out and causing other problems. Mr. Westley stated that he is unclear about the issue of the parking lot closing hours and when the lights should be turned off. He noted that that issue is not part of the present package; however, he asked for clarification of the matter. He asked if the parking lot lights are off, and the parking lot itself is closed, can the City say that the store cannot remain open because they are not providing parking. Comm. Peirce stated that that would be a question to pose before the City Council. Chmn. Compton stated that the intent of the condition in question is to ensure that the public is not parking in the Music Plus lot during off hours. Pat Price, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission. She felt that the citizen's concerns have been pretty well addressed. She noted concern over the fact that the applicant has not attempted to converse with the residents. She noted that there are still people loitering around Music Plus. There is still a problem with noise. She stated that the problems have been somewhat reduced; however, she felt that that is because Music Plus.has not been, selling choice tickets since the last public hearing. Ms. Price noted that there have been problems with the parking lot. She felt that the area should be monitored to ensure that customers are parking. in the designated parking areas. She hoped that the Commission does not change the wording in Condition No. 7, stating that she feels it is appropriate. Shirley Meyer, 654 8th Street, Hermosa Beach, stated that she would hate to see the problems increase; therefore, she favored the inclusion of Condition No. 7 as submitted. She noted that she still has concerns over the parking, traffic, speeding, and other issues. She stated that she has never been included in regard to any impact study. Ms. Meyer stated that she has never been contacted by anyone from Music Plus in order to discuss any of the problems. She stated that only one person has ever been contacted, and she felt she and the others have been ignored. Marianne Wright, 731 8th Street, Hermosa Beach, stated that with the ticket sales, people are now stopping everywhere to drop off somebody to run in and pick up the tickets. She passed out several photographs depicting the traffic jams and people running into the store. Ms. Wright stated that people prefer to park on the street rather than in the lot. She said that people sometimes park in the lot all night long. Ms. Wright stated that the Music Plus store closes at various times of the night. George Katoulis, 701-703 8th Street, Hermosa Beach, questioned the addition of more parking spaces at this establishment. He noted concern that the business would expand once they have the additional parking. P.C. Minutes 4/19/88 Public Hearing closed at 12:23 A.M. by Chmn. Compton. MOTION by Comm. Ingell, seconded by Comm. Rue, to approve staff's recommendation, with the deletion of Condition No. 7. Therefore, Conditions 8, 9, and would need to be renumbered to reflect the deletion. Comm. Rue discussed Condition No. 8: "Additional conditions may be imposed if problems arise, such as loitering and overnight camping." He suggested the addition of wording to encompass other disruptive actions. He noted that there have many concerns voiced by citizens. Comm. Rue discussed Condition No. 2: "Regular event, low demand ticket sales may commence at 10:00 unless complaints are received." He noted concern over this condition. Mr. Lough noted two typographical errors on the Resolution: Condition No. 3: "Signs shall be placed clearly stating...', Condition No. 4: "The owner shall obtain a business license for the ticket sales." AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION by Comm. Ingell as maker and Comm. Rue as second, to direct that the typographical errors be corrected. 441 Comm. Peirce discussed Condition No. 2, stating that he remembered that the Planning Commission had required that no ticket sales shall take place before 11:00 A.M. He agreed that 10:00 might be inappropriate. Comm. Peirce favored the inclusion Condition No. 7, stating that ticket sales can have a large impact on the community, and it is something that the City should watch very carefully. He stated that action should be taken before problems arise so that problems will not be several years behind in the correction process. Comm. Ingell agreed; however, he felt that the applicant is in the business of selling music and tickets. He felt that the applicant is the best judge of what impact an additional ticket machine would have on his business. Comm. Peirce felt that the Planning Director should be notified when a change is proposed in the ticket sales. With the addition of a ticket machine, it could be several months before any problems surface. He said that it is more difficult to correct a problem after the fact that it is to watch a problem and take action to remedy the situation. Comm. Rue stated that he would agree that notice should be given to the Planning Director. Chmn. Compton suggested wording for Condition No. 7: "Any changes to the interior layout which leads to significantly enhanced ticket sales shall require the Planning Director to be noticed." This specifically would be tied only to ticket sales. Also, approval by the Planning Director shall not be required; merely, that the Planning Director be notified. Comm. Rue agreed with Chmn. Compton's suggestion. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION by Comm. Ingell as maker and agreed to by Comm. Rue as second, to retain Condition No. 7, with the following wording: "Any changes to the - /S- P.C. Minutes 4/19/88 interior layout which leads to significantly enhanced ticket sales shall require the Planning Director to be noticed." Comm. Ingell stressed that the City needs to develop a rapport with successful businesses, noting the importance of businesses in town. Comm. Peirce asked if the issue of the time for selling tickets should be addressed, explaining that when the matter left the Planning Commission, tickets were not to be sold until 11:00. This resolution (Condition No. 1) states that tickets can be sold at 10:00. He felt that 11:00 is more appropriate than 10:00. Mr. Schubach stated that the applicant wanted to leave that issue open. He stated that the applicant will be proposing a new method by which tickets are sold, which might prove to be more effective than is being done presently. Chmn. Compton noted, however, that the applicant was allowed to sell low -demand tickets at 10:00; only the high -demand special event tickets were to be sold beginning at 11:00. AYES: Comms. Ingell, Peirce, Rue, Chmn. Compton NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. DeBellis -16- P.C. Minutes 4/19/88 )1023 LAR 1H1 CITY APPLICANT 1622 DF. 488-00519 'i024 LOG .':02 CITY :!:?:.ICAN' DR #88-00520 1102 L06' :c2) PERSONEL COMPLAINT -:20 DI, { :" 11: / ,. l .. l:a:� • 10.1bE . CMP2 /04` , 1"109/C.:',A11 59 PACIFIC COAST NY : i -- ,'21ST): PRA 1323 COMP, ARLAN 2ARHAt--:ETR. 'JASEK POLAK PURSCHE. Sin INC 41C .1. P ? HAS FUR?!?CR IP'TO. 'e;SC SA*::. _TCR, 1Lc:: ::25 SCAN 1 30 SCAN, 914N 114:a VIA MDT 1646 CANCEL, 1D2 WI,L HANDLE EFC STATION VIA LANDLINE ?LETE 02/01/98 1027 /41.1 :7 {CMP3/ 0 0107n104/1 '29 'ACI!IC.0 A ;:i NEAR SF £T 1:.44 COMP, K&V31 RE2AK, MANASER. " ':'. PLUS- 274 3005. P,rISpu_E CVE •1:.11 TO Ms ATONED AT TPC TROFT i ;;.z.ILI . OA 20 YRS, Hr::.. :?T, DIX SNORTS 1647A FISP 1L5D #12::`: tri 1:x47 ENROUT 1L5D, NORTH Et 1647 ENROUT 121, HT! STATIO' 1651 ONSCNE 1L5D 1656 RADIO 1L5D, CODE -4 1356 INSERV 121 :559 CLEM( 1L5D ADAST. BCTF PARTIES AVMS£ :, DISPUTE DUE TC LACK -c-Ot"1UNI(AT1 115: CLOSED :MPLETE 02/01/5 1020 3/459k °IVP4! 4e: :1::7,1f l C - - n5 2u!) T (!' NEAP 17,: -_IC C C Staff Review Minutes April 7, 1988 1 PROJECT CUP 88-1 Coditional Use Permit for ticket sales at 727 Pacific Coast Hwy (Music Plus) Mr. Perea explained that the applicant is'requesting a CUP for ticket sales pursuant to a recent City Council ordinance which requires ticket sales establishments to apply for Conditional Use Permits. No environmental concerns. No Police Department problems. Mr. Peres advised the applicant that they would be required to obtain a business license. Motion By Mr. Perea to recommend a negative declaration, second By Engineer Bridges. No objections, so ordered. nritO4ECT ALJJ)L .bS �} F� PA t - COAdC1-- 1114) yr 050.C'4(A ct. Project Name (If applicable) i slt-T ") LEGAL DESCRIPTION 6751.e.2— VoLV- ik k.eda.-ao lke w ASh 1&rZONING APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name(s) e atm Mailing Address Xotlsttuk. ` C, -3 Ph on(713) 4514) 71 1149 LM- 4%01144044, Rogo Applciant's Relationship to Propert APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE / /.� PROJECT REQUEST ✓. Conditional Use Permit -Commercial Conditional Use Permit -Condominium Number of Units evelopment Agreement Environmental Staff Review ' 'Final Subdivision (Parcel/Tract Map) General Plan FOR OFFICE USE ONLY- Date of submittal: Lot Line Adjustment Lot Split Parking Plan. Precise Plan Specific Plan Specific Plan Amendment Tentative Subdivision (Parcel/Tract Map) Zone Change Zone Variance TOTAL FEES 4 65 7 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Received by: C $;04.4 use. (72,,uz-t- cU� f soJ2 ,a) ' (attach additional pages i necessary) OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT* 1 'I hOtYS )4'.619-4/146i7 being duly sworn, depose and say that .we/I are/am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are true and -correct to the best of our/my knowledge and belief. is Subsc�ribed and sworn before me this eat. day of AfAC 'G/d. , 19 .f .fy . alt NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the County of State of California. Signed; Owner's Address,: = •4 OFFICIALT3Eiaph PATRICIA MORELAND NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY My comm. expires JUN 18, 1991 * Signature required from current property owner, not owner in escrow. • CITY ®E HERMOSA BEAC•H _ •a' I, the undersigned, do declare under penalty of perjury that I did on the 12th day of Mav ► 1988 , deposit into the United States post office, first class postage prepaid, a copy of the public notice attached as Exhibit "A" to each and every person attached as Exhibit "B". I warrant that the persons named on Exhibit "B" are all the persons required by applicable law to receive the public notice attached as Exhibit "A". I understand and agree that it is my responsibility to cause these public notices to be made in an accurate and timely fashion and agree to hold the City harmless against any liability whatsoever for any defect of said notice or notices. In the event an action is instituted in a court of com- petent jurisdiction which questions the legality of the public notices, then the City may in its exclusive descretion suspend all hearings or cause the cessation of any construction or of any use which was permitted as a result of a hearing which was held in accordance with the public notice. In the event that the court declares the notice or noticing procedure to be effective, then the City may in its exclusive discretion revoke any permits granted and cuase any approvals given pursuant to those public notices to be declared null and void and I agree on behalf of.myself and my heirs, assigns or successors -in -interest to hold the City harmless in connection therewith. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. I have executed this declaration on this the 12th May , 19 88 at Hermosa Beach, California. NOTARY: (/246 Robert W. Vargo day of (name) - Agent (Capacity) NMN..:••)•:1•:.. .•.•..0•).);:i •tri�.�•.�>.�� :..i••:•1 • OFFlCtAL �FtK CHERYL A. VARGO 2 NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY ti My Commission Expires Aug. 16, 1989 .y is 1,4 :a May 18, 1988 City Council Meeting May 24, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE FOR ZONE CHANGE MUSTS PLUS RESUBMITTAL FOR APPROVAL AS TO FORM RESOLUTION FOR PRECISE PLAN Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Adopt the attached ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-2, C -POTENTIAL TO C-3 AND A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 720 - 8TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK A, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT."(MUSIC PLUS), provided all requirements have been properly satisfied (Conditional use permit). 2. Approve as to form Resolution 88-5099 entitiled " A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING OF A PRECISE PLAN FOR 720 - 8TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK A, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT." (Music Plus) with the change on page 1, line 24, "approval of CUP"; changed to "approval of Frecise_Plan". Background At the City Council Meeting January 12, 1988, the City Council held a Public Hearing on the Zone Change and Precise Plan for this property. Ordinance No. 88-915 for the rezoning was introduced. The Ordinance has been continued several times, the most recent action was to bring it back May 24, 1988, to allow the owner time to secure a Conditional Use Permit. Resolution 88-5099 was adopted on January 12, 1988. After adoption it was noted that the above mentioned change should be considered. It was resubmitted on January 26, 1988 for approval of the change, and has been continued along with the Ordinance several meetings. Concur: vin . Northc City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 8 8- 915 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-2, C -POTENTIAL TO C-3 AND A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 720 8TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK A, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on January 12, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony on this matter and made the following Findings: A. The City Council wishes to expand commercially zoned property within the Multi -Use Corridor; B. The C -Potential designation indicates that this property's ultimate use is commercial; and C. The proposed zone change is consistent with the General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The official Zoning Map shall be amended by rezoning the property at 720 8th street, legally described as Lots 5 and 6, Block A, Redondo Hermosa Tract, from R-2, C -Potential zone to C-3, General Commercial zone. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Section 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the Hermosa Beach, California. 1988. ATTEST: \ APPROVED A CITY CLERK TY ATTIRNE M•..11Y111 ��./�/�•ii�t�.ntll/�/ • Location a. Address: 20 - 8th St., Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 • b. Legal: Lots 5 & 6, Block A, Redondo Hermosa Tract Description Zona rhangp from R-7. r -pot_ to 0-3 & Precise Plan 3. Sponsor a. Name: r_e-ry rohpn. r/n RpgtPPn & Assoc_ b. Mailing Address: 1429 4th Street Sant a'Monica.CA 90_401 Phone:(213) 451-8171 NEGATIVE DECLARATION In accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City of Hermosa beach, which im- plements the California Environmental quality Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach, the Environmental Review Committee must make an environmental review of all .private projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planning • Commission must make an environmental review of all public projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, which are subject to the Environmental quality Act. This declaration is documentation of the review and, if it be- comes final, no comprehensive Enviromnental Impact Report is required for this project. .. FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE .We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro - .posed project in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas- ures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation ppor 3 g this finding is on file in the .Building Department. August' 6, 1987 Date of Finding Cha man, nvironmental Review Committee FINDING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this pro- ject in accordance with Resolution 79-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environ- mental Impact Report because, provided the attached miti•ation measures are included in the project, it woul• of a •+ ifi •nt effect on the en- vironment. Documentation su•-•rting n the Build- ing Department. October 20, 1987 Date of Finding • n, Pla ning Commission FI + OF THE CITY COUNCIL We have undertaken and completed an environmental Impact Review of this pro- posed project in accordance with Resolution 70-4309 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find this project does not require a comprehensive En- vironmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation meas- ures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on. the environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Building Department. Date of Finding Mayor, Hermosa Beach City Council. RESOLUTION NO. 88-5099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING OF A PRECISE PLAN FOR 720 - 8TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK A, REDONDO 'HERMOSA TRACT. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on January 12, 1988 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter And made the following Findings: A. This Precise Plan is approved in conjunction with a zone change from R-2, C -Potential to C-3 at 720 - 8th Street; B. The Zoning Ordinance requires properties designated "C -Potential" to submit a Precise Plan for approval; C. The applicant proposes to develop the site as a parking lot in conjunction with an adjacent retail business at 729 Pacific Coast Highway; D. The proposed parking lot will provide additional parking for the business and therefore, be a benefit to the community by reducing the demand for the already impacted on -street parking; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does bereby approve a Precise Plan for property at 720 - 8th Street, legally described as Lots 5 and 6, Block A, Redondo Hermosa Tract subject to the following conditions; 1. A lot merger prohibiting the separation, sale, and/or lease of individual lots which constitute the overall subject property as shown on submitted plans shall be recorded prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The existing residential structure shall be completely removed within one year of approval of this Precise Plan. 3. Parking spaces shall be striped in conformance with the Zoning Code. 4. The entire parking area shall be paved, and/or resurfaced. a. Any cracks and/or potholes shall be repaired. 1 5. Lighting, either existing or proposed, for the parking lot shall comply with all of the following: a. Conform to building regulations. b. Directed away from all residential properties to avoid all glare. c. The business must eliminate lighting at 10:00 p.m. with the exception of security lighting. d. Light must be on a timer. e. Security lighting shall be provided and maintained after 10:00 p.m. 6. Fencing along the north side of the parking area shall be a maximum of 5 feet wrought iron to provide visibility into the entire parking lot and set back 3 or 4 feet from property line to reduce the impact of it's height. 7. Security gates shall be provided. a. The security gates shall be closed after 10:00 p.m. 8. Landscaped areas shall be'as shown modified plans and shall be subject to approval by the Planning Director a. Landscaped areas shall be maintained in a heat and clean manner. b. An automatic landscape sprinkler system shall be provided. c. 6 inch, raised concrete curbing along the perimeter of all landscaped areas shall be provided. d. Minimum size of trees shall be 15 gallon with locations as specified on plans. e. A minimum of three to four, 24 inch boxed trees along the north side. 9. Landscaped areas shall be modified to include wide planted areas the deeper the project intrudes into the existing residential neighborhood. 10. The proposed block wall shall be of a split -face, earth tone block, other than grey, and shall be maintained in undamaged. condition free of graffiti. 11. A grading plan resolving any and/or all water ponding problems at the subject location shall be submitted to the Building Department for review and approval prior to obtaining Building Permits. 12. Circulation of the parking lot shall be as follows: a. The westerly driveway shall be designated as the entrance. b. The easterly driveway shall be designated as the exit. c. Painted arrows and signs shall be provided to direct circulation. 13. Two decorative trash can locations shall be provided subject to approval by the Planning Director. 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 14. Development shall substantially conform with approved revised plans and shall conform to all of the conditions set forth in this resolution. Any modifications are subject to approval by the Planning Director. 15. Owner management shall implement effective strategies to control loitering at the site due to special event ticket sales. a. Ticket sales shall be prohibited prior to 11:00 a.m. daily for special events, or other acceptable methods to eliminate overnight camping, loitering, or similar behavior of patrons shall be provided. b. Regular event, low demand, ticket sales may commence if no problems arise. c. Any alternate method shall be subject to approval of the Planning Director prior to implementation. d. Signage shall be placed clearly stating "No loitering, camping, or trespassing on neighborhood property". 16. Owner shall request a Conditional Use Permit for ticket sales. a. A Conditional Use -Permit application shall be submitted within 90 days of the adoption of the proposed Text Amendment. 17. Owner shall obtain a Businesss License for special event ticket sales. 18. Three (3) copies of the revised site plan conforming to the conditions set forth herein shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval prior to issuance of any Building Permits. 19. This Precise Plan shall become null and void unless substantial effort to implement said plan has occurred within one year. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 12th day of January 1988. PR SID NT off the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: PPROVED A TO 0'� LERK TY ATTORNEY Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5098 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING A CITY MANAGER (Kevin B. Northcraft) with a change on line 16 "effective February 21, 1988." and on line 24 adding "Said contract is at- tached as Exhibit A." Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. The following items were discussed at this time but are listed in order on the Consent Calendar for clarity: (e), (f), (p), (t), (v), (z), (bb), (cc), and (dd). 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. None. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. ZONE CHANGE FROM R-2, C -POTENTIAL TO C-3 AND PRECISE PLAN AT 720 EIGHTH STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 4, 1988. Sup- plemental information - memorandum from Assistant Plan- ner Andrew Perea dated January 11, 1988. The staff report was presented by Planning Director Michael Schuback who noted that residents feel that one unit was not notified of the hearing. City Attorney Lough directed that the minutes of the December 15, 1987 City Council meeting be made a part of this record. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak in favor of the zone change were: Mark Westley, 3324 Colorado Street, representing Music Plus Wilma Burt, 1152 - 7th Street Tim Syvar, 19725 Sherman Way, for Music Plus Curtis Adams, 1217 Owosso Long Beach, Canoga Park, architect Speak in opposition to the zone change were: Pat Price, 719 - 8th Street Randy Warren, 710 - 8th Street (former owner) Shirley Myer, 654 - 8th Street Mary Wright, 731 - 8th Street The Public Hearing was closed. - 8 Minutes 1-12-88 Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 88-915 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AP- PROVING A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-2, C -POTENTIAL TO C-3 AND A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 720 8TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK A, RE- DONDO HERMOSA TRACT." Motion Sheldon, second Williams ' AYES - Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - Creighton Further Action: To allow Jerry Cohen to speak for three minutes. Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. Speaking to Council was Jerry Cohen, 1429 - 4th Street, Santa Monica - broker representing Music Plus - urged approval of the Precise Plan. Final Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5099 entitled "RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING OF A PRECISE PLAN FOR 720 - 8TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK A, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT" with an amendment that the busi- ness must secure the parking lot and eliminate lighting (with the exception of security lighting) at 10:00 P.M. Motion Sheldon, second Williams AYES - Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - Creighton ABSTAIN - Rosenberger MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6 INSTALLATION OF A SOUND SYSTEM FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IN THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Memorandum from Public Works Administrative Aide Merelyn Vanole dated December 23, 1987. Supplemental information - letter from Fleet Nuttall'dated January 7, 1988. The staff report was presented by Public Works Director Anthony Antich. Action: To 1) approve the purchase and installation of a sound system in the Council Chambers for the hearing impaired, and 2) transfer $600 from Prospective Expendi- tures to the City Council Equipment account. Motion Creighton, second Williams AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - None - 9 IMP 4 Minutes 1-1.2-88 Speaking to Council in opposition to the recommended action was Pat Quigley, 1927 Valley Park. Action: To direct the Public Works Director to meet with the engineers for the developer and county to ap- prove corrections assuming that the grading plan meets all the necessary engineering requirements, the plan to be referred back to City Council for final approval after review by the City Attorney. Motion Williams, second Creighton. So ordered. CITIZENS ADDRESSING CONSENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Jerry Cohen, Westwood Music, spoke on item 2(b), requesting no limitations on hours of operation, or as an alternative, limit hours Monday through Thursday to10:00P.M., other evenings and holiday months until 11:00 P.M. MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING Action: To waive full reading of any ordinance or resolution on this evening's agenda. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Rosenberger NOES - None ABSENT - Mayor Simpson 2. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (a) ORDINANCE NO. 88-915 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE FROM R- 2, C -POTENTIAL TO C-3 AND A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR . PROPERTY LOCATED AT 720 8TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK A, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT. For adoption. Action: To bring this Ordinance back for adoption in 30 days. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. (b) RESOLUTION 88-5099 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING OF A PRECISE PLAN FOR 720 - 8TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK A, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT. Resubmit- tal for approval as to form. Memorandum from City Clerk Kathleen Midstokke dated January 19, 1988. Action: To bring this Resolution back for adoption in 30 days considering a change on page 1, line 24, "ap- proval of CUP"; should it read "approval of Precise Plan". Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ) I, KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE, City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 88-5099 was duly and regularly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council Of the City of Hermosa Beach at a regular meeting of said Council held at the regular meeting place thereof on January 12, 1988. The vote was as follows: AYES: Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES: Creighton ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Rosenberger DATED: January 19, 1988 AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams NOES - None ABSENT - Mayor Simpson 2. ORDINANCES AND,RESOLUTIONS (a) ORDINANCE NO. 88-915 - AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-2 C -POTENTIAL TO C-3 AND NEGATIVE DECLA- RATION FOR PROPERTYLOCAT7D AT 720 EIGHTH STREET LEGAL - Y DESCRIBED AS.LOTS 5 AND BLOCK A REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT. For adoption. (Continued from January 2 and February 23, 1988 meetings.) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 1, 1988 requesting continuation of this matter to May 24, 1988. Supplemen- tal information - memorandum from Associate Planner An- drew Perea dated March 7, 1988. Speaking to Council was Jerry Cohen, 1429 - 4th Street, Santa Monica, requesting continuance to allow the owner to get the Conditional Use. Permit in place. Action: To continue this item to May 24, 1988. Motion Williams, second Creighton. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. (b) RESOLUTION 88-5099 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING.A PRECISE PLAN FOR.720,EIGHTH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED_AS_LOT$,5 AND 4, BLOCK A,. REDONDO,(IERMOSA TRACT. For adoption. (Continued from January 26 and February 23, 1988 meet- ings.) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 1, 1988 requesting continuation of this matter to May 24, 1988. Supplemental information - memorandum from Associate Planner Andrew Perea dated March 7, 1988. Ae1tfon; To continue this item to May 24, 1988. Motion Williams, second Creighton. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. (c) ORDINANCE NO. 88-917 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP_BY.CHANGING THE ZONE FOR AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWNON..THE ATTACHED MAPS AND,ADOPTING ANENVIRON- MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. (Areasl, 1A and..1B5. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88-917 entitled "AN OR- DINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FOR AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. (Areas 1, 1A and 1B). Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered noting the absence of Mayor Simpson. - 5 - • Minutes 3-8-88 (u) Claim for Damages: James Jones, represented by Howard A. Kapp, Esq., 315 So. Beverly Drive, Suite 406, Beverly Hills, CA 90212. Action: To deny claim and refer to City's Claims Administrator. (v) Authorization to solicit bids for Police Department_re- modeli first floor (CIP 87-6061. Memorandum from Public Works Director.Anthony Antich dated February 11, 1988. Action: To 1) approve plans and specifications for Police Dept. 1st floor remodel including dispatch room, 2) authorize call for bids, and 3) authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary. (w) Authorisation tosolicit_bids for traffic si nal im- provements (CIP 65-138).. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 11, 1988. Action: To authorize staff to advertise for 'bids for rf affic Signal Improvements - CIP 85-138, and issue ad- denda as necessary. (x) Preliminary Design Report for Sanitary Sewer Design (CIP ,.7-}05). Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 10, 1988. Action: To 1) accept the preliminary design report, and authorize completion of the plans and specifications for CIP 86-405. (y) Award of contract.- downtown area maintenance. Memoran- dum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 16, 1988. Action: To 1) reject bids, 2) authorize staff to re - advertise for bids and issue addenda as necessary, and 3) approve month-to-month extension with Specialty Main- tenance, Inc. for the 3 -months remaining (April, May & June) in FY 87-88. CITIZENS COMMENTS ON CONSENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Jerry Cohen, Epstein & Associates, Santa Monica, representing Music Plus, asked for a continuance to the next meeting on items 2(a) and 2(b), Ordinance No. 88-915 for adoption and Resolution No. 88-5099 for adoption. Action: To continue agenda items 2(a) and 2(b) to the City Coun- cil meeting of March 8, 1988. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered. - 4 - • Minutes 2-23-88 Action: To suspend the agenda and go to agenda item 5, Public Hearings. Motion Williams, 'second Creighton. So ordered. MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING Action: To waive full reading of any ordinance or resolution on this evening's agenda. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES - None 2. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (a) ORDINANCE NO. 88-915 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE FROM R- 2, C -POTENTIAL TO C-3 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PROP- ERTY LOCATED AT 720 EIGHTH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK A, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT. For waiver of further reading and adoption. (Continued from January 26, 1988 meeting.)' Continued to March 8, 1988 meeting. (b) RESOLUTION 88-5099 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRE- CISE PLAN FOR 720 EIGHTH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK A, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT. For adop- tion. (Continued from January 26, 1988 meeting.) Continued to March 8, 1988 meeting. (c) ORDINANCE NO. 88-916 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DELETING TICKET BROKER FROM THE C-1 ZONE AND ADDING TICKET BROKER/SALES SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO THE C-2 ZONE PERMITTED USE LIST AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88-916 entitled "AN OR- DINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DELET- ING TICKET BROKER FROM THE C-1 ZONE AND ADDING TICKET BROKER/SALES SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO THE C-2 ZONE PERMITTED USE LIST AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMEN- TAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered. (d) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO ACCESS OF CRIMINAL HIS- TORY INFORMATION FOR PURPOSES OF EMPLOYMENT, LICENSING, OR CERTIFICATION. For adoption. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated February 10, 1988. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 88-5107 entitled "A . RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA - 5 - Minutes 2-23-88 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 16,1988 Regular Meeting of June 14, 1988 CONFIRMATION OF FY 88-89 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT ASSESSMENT Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council adopt Resolution No. 88- , a resolution of the City of Hermosa Beach confirming the FY 88-89 street lighting district assessment and levying assessment for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1988. Background: On April 26, 1988 City Council Adopted Resolution No. 88-5130, which set 8:00 p.m. on June 14, 1988 as the time and date for a public hearing in order to accept public input on this matter. Analysis: A notice for this public hearing was printed in the May 19, 1988, edition of the Easy Reader. Adoption of the attached resolution provides for the funds necessary to continue the operation of the City's street lighting system. The assessment provides for the payment of all costs related to street lighting operation, maintenance and administration. The FY 88-89 assessment is as follows: FY 87-88 FY 88-89 Amount of Assessment Percent Decrease $397,647.31 $365,878.80 8% The assessment for FY 88-89 is $31,768.41 less than FY 87-88. Mr. Patrick Rossetti, the City's Assessment Engineer, will be present at the June 14, 1988 meeting to answer questions about the assessment. 1 Alternatives: Another alternative available to City Council is: 1) Let the district lapse; thereby, causing an increased general fund obligation of $365,878.80. Respectfully submit -d, fvol 7fkoe Anthony Antich Director of Public Works Noted for•Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator Concur: Kevin B. Nort craft City Manager Attachments: Estimate of Costs FY 87-88 Resolution No. 88- s1/1 mv sl/1 :mv 2 HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1988-1989 ESTIMATE OF COST FY 1988-1989 1. Direct Expenses: Regular Salaries/Miscellaneous Regular Overtime Vacation/Sick Pay Off Accrual Cash In Part time/temporary Retirement Employee Benefits Contract. Services/Private: - Assessment Engineering Services Contract Services/Government: - L. A. Co. Collections of Assessments ($2,000) - PCH Lighting Agreement w/Caltrans ($6,000) Materials/Supplies/Other (incl. energy costs) Subtotal 2. Incidental Expenses City Manager Administration 500 City Council Administration 500 Engineering Department 2,500 500 Legal Expense 500 City Clerk Expense 500 Total $ 66,018 1,000 1,650 1,650 4,000 10,971 9,912 18,150 8,000 201,300 $322,651 3. Operating Expenses of Equipment and Data Support Services: 4. Capital Improvements: CIP 85-102 Highland Lights CIP 85-201 Light Conv./Install. CIP 85-202 Hermosa Ave. Lighting CIP 85-203 Pier Lighting Repair Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal $ 4,500 $ 1,000 $ 26,000 44,000 49,500 27,500 $147,000 Total Costs for Street Lighting District No. 88.-89 $ 475,151 1 HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1988-1989 FY 87-88 Actual June 30, 1987 Fund Balance Estimated FY 87-88 Revenue (as of 2/29/88) Estimated FY 87-88 Expenditure $1,242,674 507,647 < 621,203> Estimated June 30, 1988 Fund Balance $1,129,215 FY 88-89 Estimated July 1, 1988 Fund Balance NET ASSESSMENT FOR FY 88-89 Estimated FY 88-89 Expenditure Estimated June 30, 1989 Fund Balance hbcgsl/1 4/7788 2 $1,129,215 $ 365,878.80 < 475,151> $1,019,943 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMIMG DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND LEVYING ASSESSMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1988. HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1988-1989 WHEREAS, in proceedings under the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (commencing with Section 22500, Streets and Highways Code), the City Council adopted Resolution No. 88-5519 ordering the Director of Public Works to prepare and file the report required by said Act for the proposed levy of an annual assessment for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1988, and pursuant thereto such report has been prepared and filed with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the City Counci•1 adopted its Resolution No. 88-5129, approving the report as filed pursuant to Resolution No. 88-1119, ordering said report; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted its Resolution of Intention No. 88-5130 declaring its intention to order certain street lighting fixtures and appurtenances to be installed, mmaintained and electric current to be furnished for lighting said fixtures for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1988 and appointing a time and place for hearing protests relative thereto; and WHEREAS, the hearing was duly held at the time and place fixed therefor and all interested persons, desiring to hear and be heard, either orally or in writing, were afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard on the report of the Director of Public Works, the Diagram and Assessment contained therein, or in any way relating to the report and the proceedings. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has considered all oral and written protests made or filed by any interested persons, and except to the extent of any changes ordered by the City Council, each and all such protests are overruled and denied. SECTION 2. The Assessment and Diagram are hereby confirmed. The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1988, as referred to in the assessment. SECTION 3. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution and of the Diagram and Assessment referred to herein with the County Auditor of the County of Los Angeles. Tnereupon, the County Auditor shall provide for the collection of the assessments at the time and in the manner provided in the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972". SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the same to be entered in the book of original Resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. SECTION 5. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM.A,, City Clerk , City Attorney May 16, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 14, 1988 HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1988-1989 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council introduce the attached ordinance which: 1) confirms the report of the Director of Public Works dated April 13, 1988, prepared pursuant to Resolution No. 88-5118 and approved pursuant to Resolution No. 88-5131 of said Council and the plans, specifications, estimates, diagrams and assessment, and 2) orders certain Crossing Guard Maintenance Services to be furnished and maintained for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1988. Background: The Crossing Guard Maintenance District was voted on at. the Special Municipal Election of November 8, 1983. The measure was an advisory vote, which is not binding and the measure passed by a 2-1 margin. As required, the necessary steps have been taken for the preparation of the public hearing set for June 14, 1988 for the adoption of the City's Crossing Guard Maintenance District, as follows: 1) March 8, 1988 - City Council adopted Resolution No. 88-5118 ordering the report for the renewal of the district. 2) April 13, 1988 - The Director of Public Works filed with the City Clerk the report consisting of estimate of cost's, maps, and assessment rolls. 3) April 26, 1988 - a. City Council adopted Resolution No. 88-5131, approving the report. b. City Council adopted Resolution No. 88-5132, (a resolu- tion of intention) which set the date of the public hearing for June 14, 1988 at 8:00 p.m. in order to accept public input on this matter. Analysis: The Government Code provides authority for this assessment. The adoption of the attached ordinance provides the funds necessary to sustain the City's Crossing Guard Maintenance District. 1 9 Funds to operate and maintain the Crossing Guards are provided via an annual assessment. The annual assessment for FY 88-89 is as follows: FY 87-88 FY 88-89 Amount Percent Decrease $75,971.00 $74,733.04 1.6% The assessment for FY 88-89 is $1,238.04 less than FY 87-88. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Let the District lapse; thereby, increasing the General Fund obligation by approximately $74,733. Respectfully Submitted Concur: Ant ony Antich '" 'Kevin B. Nort raft Director of Pub is Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator City Manager• Attachments: Estimate of Costs FY 88-89 Ordinance No. 88- cg/v 2 HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1988-1989 ESTIMATE OF COST FY 1988-1989 Total 1. Direct Expenses: Regular Salaries/Miscellaneous $ 10,686 Regular Salaries/safety -0- Special Duty Pay -0.- Vacation/Sick 0=Vacation/Sick Pay Off 267 Accrual Cash In 267 Crossing Guards 36,000 Retirement 1,448 Uniforms 1,000 Employee Benefits 780 Contract Services/Private: - Assessment Engineering Services 7,700 7,700 Contract Services/Government: - L. A. Co. Collections of Assessments 500 500 Subtotal $58,648 2. Incidental Expenses City Manager Administration 500 City Council Administration 500 Engineering Department 2,500 Legal Expense 500 City Clerk Expense 500 Subtotal $ 4,500 Total Costs for Crossing Guards District NO. 88-89 $63,148 HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1988-89 FY 87-88 Actual June 30, 1987 Fund Balance Estimated FY 87-88 Revenue (as of 2/29/88) Estimated FY 87-88 Expenditure Return of August 25, 1987 General Fund Loan Estimated Fund Balance June 30, 1988 FY 88-89 Estimated Fund Balance July 1, 1988 NET ASSESSMENT FOR FY 88-89 Estimated FY 88-89 Expenditure Estimated June 30, 1989 Fund Balance hbcg/1 4/7/88 < 890> 79,192 < 52,652> < 22,622> $ 3,028 $ 3,028 74,733.04 < 63,148> $14,613 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 24 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATED APRIL 13, 1988 PREPARED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 88-5118 AND APPROVED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 88-5131 OF SAID COUNCIL, AND THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ESTIMATE, DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT CONTAINED IN SAID REPORT; ORDERING CERTAIN CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED AND MAINTAINED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, did in Resolution 87-5118 of said Council, pursuant to the provisions of the "Crossing Guard Maintenance District Act of 1974" (Chapter 3.5, Article 2, 3 and 4, Sections 55530 through 55570, of the Government Code of the State of California) , require the Director of Public Works of said City to make and file with the Clerk of the City Council a report in writin, presenting certain matters relating to the proposed Crossing Guard Maintenance District No. 1988-1989, as contemplated under the provisions of said Act; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works, pursuant to the requirements of said City Council as expressed in*Resolution No. 87-5118 and did on the 13th day of April, 1988 , file in the office of the City Clerk (who'is ex -officio Clerk of the City Council) of said City, his report in writing responsive to the requirements of said Resolution No. 88-5118 and as contemplated under the provisions of said Act; and WHEREAS, the said City Council did in Resolution No. 89-5131 approve said report on the 26th day of April, 1988, in conformity with the provisions of said Act; and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2;1 281 WHEREAS, said City Council did thereafter and on said 26th day of April, 1988, pass its Resolution of Intention No. 88-5132 declaring its intention to order certain Crossing Guard Maintenance Services for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1988; and WHEREAS, Said City Council did on said 26th day of April, 1988, in its Resolution No. 88-5132 fix and designate Tuesday, the 14th day of June, 1988, at the hour of 8:00 p.m. of said day as the time for hearing protests in reference to the proposed maintenance and assessment, at the Council Chamber, in the City Hall, Civic Center, in the City of Hermosa Beach, California; and WHEREAS, at the time and place above stated for hearing protests in reference to the proposed maintenance and assessment, certain written and oral protests and objections were filed and presented, which said protests and objections were fully and regularly heard and considered by said Council; and WHEREAS, said City Council being fully advised in the premises, does hereby proceed as follows: NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, FIND, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That said Council does hereby deny all protests and objections and does hereby approve, confirm and adopt the said report of said Director of Public Works dated the 13th day of April, 1988, and does hereby approve and confirm the assessment proposed for said proposed maintenance as set forth and referred to in said report, which said report is now on file 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 25 in the office of the City Clerk of said City, open to inspection, hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and said City Council does hereby also confirm and adopt the respective instruments therein contained and designated therein as SPECIFICATIONS, DIAGRAM AND PLAN NO. 1988-1989, Estimate of Costs and Assessment, all of which, on file as aforesaid, are hereby incorporated herein and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That said Council does hereby order the said contemplated maintenance to be made in accordance with the said PLAN and SPECIFICATIONS therefor, so adopted and approved, and does hereby order and determine that the fiscal year referred to in said Resolution of Intention No.88-5132 shall be and the same is hereby fixed and established as the period commencing on the 1st day of July, 1988,.and ending on the 30th day of June, 1989 both dates inclusive, as therein set forth; and said Council does hereby levy the said proposed total assessment made to cover the costs and expenses of said improvement upon the respective several subdivisions of land in the assessment district described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-5132 and as fixed and determined by said report, dated Aprill3, 1988, and the proposed assessment, filed therewith, as aforesaid, in the office of the City Clerk of said City, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1988 and ending June 30, 1989 both dates inclusive. SECTION 3. That the City Council hereby orders and directs the City Treasurer to establish a special fund entitled, "Hermosa Beach Crossing Guard Maintenance District No.1988-1989 Fund"; and who shall place into said Fund all payments of assessments 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2G 27 28 received from the County Tax Collector and payments shall be made out to said special Fund only for the purposes provided for in said Chapter 3.5, Article 2, 3 and 4, Sections 55530 through 55570, of the Government Code of the State of California. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk of said City is hereby ordered to transmit, or cause to be transmitted, to the County Auditor of Los Angeles County, State of California, as contemplated under the provisions of. the "Crossing Guard Maintenance District Act of 1974", the Diagram and Assessment upon which such levy is based, and the County Tax Collector of said County (who is also the City Tax Collector for said City). is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, ordered and directed to make collection of all assessments shown in said Assessment and to perform the acts and duties as are required by law of and to be performed by the officer, employee, or person so designated. SECTION 5. That prior to the expiration of fifteen days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the EASY READER, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 6. That this ordinance shall take effect thirty. (30) days after adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Her- mosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: , City Clerk City Attorney Law Offices of James P. Lough JAMES P. LOUGH June 9, 1988 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM 30 NORTH RAYMOND AVENUE SUITE 708 PASADENA CALIFORNIA 91103 (213) 3814131 (818) 7924728 (818) 792-4776 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James P. Lough, City Attorney RE: Extension of Interim Fee Ordinance and Continuance of Negative Declaration to a Date Certain Recommended Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 88- extending the Interim Fire Flow Fee Ordinance No. 88-931 and continuance of the negative declaration to a date certain. At the last city council meeting, the city council adopted an interim ordinance which established fees to partially pay for the installation of fire hydrants and their appurtenances to increase fire safety within Hermosa Beach. This ordinance is only effec- tive for a period of 30 days and, in order to continue collection of such fees, the city council must adopt the attached ordinance by a four-fifths vote. Also noticed for this meeting is review of the environmental negative declaration. Staff asked that this be continued until the next extension of the interim ordinance set in July. Said negative declaration will cover the imposition of fire fees on a permanent basis. This matter will go before staff review for recommendation to the council which may include modification of the recommended action. NOTED: Respectfully submitted, S P. LOUGH, City Attorney CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH KEVIN B. NO THC F!, City Manager 1 0 ORDINANCE NO. 88 - AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXTENDING ORDINANCE NO. 88-931 WHICH ESTABLISHES A FIRE FLOW FEE TO UPGRADE FIRE PROTECTION. WHEREAS, the city council held a public hearing on May 24, 1988 and adopted by a four-fifths vote Ordinance No. 88-931 establishing an interim fire flow fee for a period of 30 days; WHEREAS, the city council has the authority under the Government Code to extend said ordinance for a period of 30 days after the initial 30 days; and WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Hermosa Beach is desirous of maintaining a fee system in which developments bear a partial burden of fire protection in relation to the increased fire risks that they have added to the community. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance No. 88-931 is hereby readopted and extended an additional 30 days from the date of its original expiration. Section 2. The city clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the city council at which the same is passed and adopted. This ordinance shall remain in effect for a period of 30 days after the expiration of the initial 30 -day ordinance. After notice and public hearing pursuant to Government Code Sections 54986 and 54992, as applicable, the city council may extend the interim authority for an additional thirty (30) days. Not more than one more extension may be granted. Any extension shall also require a four-fifths vote. Section 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the city clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach. Section 5. Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this ordinance shall be brought within 120 days. , PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF_JUNE, 1988. \' PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA, ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 May 31, 1988 City Council Meeting June 14, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 88-932 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A FIRE FLOW FEE TO UPGRADE FIRE PROTECTION AND TO ASSIST CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS TO MEET UNIFORM FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS. Submitted for waiver of further reading and adoption is Ordinance No. 88-932 relating to the above subject. At the regular meeting of May 24, 1988, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Williams, Mayor Simpson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None NedGel2/Sk Ra hleen Midstokke, City Clerk Concur: kevin B. Northc aft, City Manager t2a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 88- 932 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ESTABLISHING A FIRE FLOW FEE TO UPGRADE FIRE PROTECTION AND TO ASSIST CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS TO MEET UNIFORM FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach recognizes the serious problems with the water system within the city which creates fire risks when new construction increases density and/or fire exposure; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach desires to establish a system in which improvements are made to the fire water flow protection system in order to increase the level of fire protection within the city; WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish a fire protec- tion water system for developments in which the burdens added to the system by new development are paid for by the developers of projects; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that all additions of new dwelling units and/or additional square footage to existing structures increases the demand on the fire protection system within the city; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the City of Hermosa Beach was originally developed as a less dense resort community and has since developed into a highly developed, densely packed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 residential community which has placed additional burdens on the fire protection water system; WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that improvement of the fire protection water system will benefit existing as well as new development; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that a relationship exists between new construction and the need to install, upgrade, and replace fire hydrants and other improvements to the fire protec- tion water system to improve fire protection and prevent the spread of fires from building to building; WHEREAS, the City Council finds a direct relationship between new development in all zones of the City and the need for fire system improvements overall; WHEREAS, the City Council finds the purpose of this fee is to finance improvements in fire protection facilities to reduce the impacts of increased density in residential, commercial and man- ufacturing areas brought on by the addition of buildings and the expansion of existing buildings within the city; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the fire protection fees collected pursuant to this interim ordinance shall be used to finance only the public facilities described or identified in Exhibit "A," attached hereto; WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows: A. After considering the study and analysis prepared by staff and the testimony received at this public hearing, the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Council approves said staff report, and incorporates such herein, and further finds that new development in the City of Hermosa Beach area will generate additional fire protection needs within the city and will contribute to the degradation of fire safety in the city; B. There is a need in the City of Hermosa Beach for addi- tional fire hydrants, hydrant replacements and upgrades in as- sociated facilities which have not been constructed or have been constructed, but new development has not contributed its fair share towards these facility costs and said facilities have been called for in or are consistent with the city's Safety Element of its General Plan; C. The facts and evidence presented establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities and the impacts of the types of development described in paragraph 3 below, for which the corresponding fee is charged, and that there is also a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development for which the fee is charged, as these reasonable relationships or nexus are in more detail described in the staff report referred to above; D. The cost estimates set forth in the staff report are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs; and WHEREAS, the materials in this study were available for public inspection and review fourteen (14) days prior to this public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Purpose. In order to implement the goals and objec- tives of the Safety Element of the General Plan of the City of Hermosa Beach and to mitigate the fire protection impacts caused by new development in the City of Hermosa Beach, certain public fire protection improvements must be or had to be constructed. The City Council has determined that a development impact fee is needed in order to finance these public improvements and to pay for the development's fair share of the construction costs of these improvements. In establishing the fee described in the following sections, the City Council has found the fee to be con- sistent with its General Plan and, pursuant to Government Code Section 65913.2, has considered the effects of the fee with respect to the city's housing needs as established in the Housing Element of the General Plan. On an annual basis, the City Coun- cil shall review this fee to determine whether the fee amounts are reasonably related to the impacts of developments and whether the described public facilities are still needed. Section 2. Fire Protection Improvement Fee. A Fire Protection Fee is hereby established on issuance of residential building permits for development in the city to pay for the fire protec- tion measures described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto. This development fee shall be paid by each developer prior to issuance of a building permit. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 3. Fee Account. The revenues raised by payment of this fee shall be placed in a separate and special fund and such revenues, along with any interest earnings on that fund, shall be used solely to pay for the city's construction of facilities described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto in the manner specified under Section 7 set out below. Section 4. Fee Adjustments. A developer of any project subject to the fee described in Section 2 may apply to the City Council for a reduction or adjustment to that fee, or a waiver of that fee, based upon the absence of any reasonable relationship or nexus between the fire protection impacts of that development and either the amount of the fee charged or the type of facilities to be financed. The application shall be made in writing and filed with the City Clerk not later than (10) ten days after notice of the amount of fees in question given by the City to developer. The application shall state in detail the factual basis for the claim of waiver, reduction or adjustment. The City Council shall consider the application at a hearing held within 60 days after the filing of the fee adjustment application. The decision of the City Council shall be final. If a reduction, adjustment or waiver is granted, any change in use within the project shall invalidate the waiver, adjustment or reduction of the fee. Section 5. Fee. (a) Residential Development Of Less Than Three Units. For new residential development, the fee shall be equal to fifty cents ($0.50) per square foot for the construction of two or less - 5 MEI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 dwelling units. For a new residential dwelling unit which rep- laces an existing residential dwelling, the fee shall be equal to fifty cents ($0.50) per square foot for the additional square footage of the new dwelling unit. Said square footage shall be calculated by subtracting the square footage of the demolished legally permitted structure from the square footage of the newly constructed dwelling unit. For existing residences that add floor space, the fee shall be equal to fifty cents ($0.50) per square foot of floor space added. Square footage shall be calcu- lated by using the methods found in the most recently approved edition of the Uniform Building Code adopted by the City of Her- mosa Beach. (b) All Other Developments. For residential development of three or more units and all other development within the city, the development shall be liable for the actual cost of improve- ment which benefits the project or a fee equal to fifty cents ($0.50) per square foot of floor space, whichever is greater. The square footage shall be calculated in the same manner as sub- section (a). Section 6. Alternative Requirements. For single family home projects which received a building permit after July 1, 1987 must provide the fire protection improvements listed on Exhibit "A" as a condition of approval, said developers may pay the fees es- tablished under this ordinance in lieu of providing the improve- ments required. Section 7. Use of Fee. The fee shall be solely used to pay (1) for the described public facilities to be constructed by the city; (2) for reimbursing the city for the development's fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the city; or (3) for reimbursing other developers who have con- structed public facilities as described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto, where those facilities were beyond that needed to miti- gate the impacts of the other developers' project or projects. Section 8. Notice and Imposition Date. This ordinance was adop- ted at a noticed public hearing, at which time the City Council also considered the associated studies which were available to the general public for a period of at least fourteen (14) days prior to the public hearing. This fee shall apply to the is- suance of any building permit, for any residential development issued 60 days following this ordinance's adoption and for all other types of development 30 days following its adoption. Section 9. Clerk Prepared Synopsis. The City Council shall designate the City Clerk to prepare a summary (synopsis) of this ordinance to be published pursuant to Government Code Section 36933(c)(1) in lieu of the full text of said ordinance. Section 10. Publication of Synopsis. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause a synopsis (summary) of this ordinance to be pub- lished in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circu- lation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. Section 11. Effective Period of Ordinance. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall en- ter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. Section 12. Judicial Action to Challenge This Ordinance. Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this ordinance shall be brought within 120 days. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY, 1988. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY EXHIBIT "An FIRE PROTECTION MEASURES SUBJECT TO FIRE PROTECTION FEE 1. HYDRANTS 2. RISER CONNECTIONS FROM MAIN TO HYDRANT 3. NECESSARY VALVES AND ATTACHMENTS AS DETERMINED BY THE WATER COMPANY 4. REPAIRS TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS STREETS AND SIDEWALKS NECESSITATED BY THE INSTALLATION OF HYDRANTS, RISERS AND NECESSARY VALVES AND ATTACHMENTS June 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 14, 1988 AUTHORIZATION TO ELIMINATE R-2 AND R-3 USES FROM THE BILTMORE SITE APPRAISAL Recommendation: That the City Council authorize staff to advise the appraiser on the Biltmore Site to delete R-2 and R-3 uses from the Biltmore Site appraisal. Background: At the City Council meeting of May 24 staff was authorized to contract for an appraisal of the Biltmore Site under the following uses, R-1, R-2, R-3, Commercial, and 1985 hotel specific plan. Analysis: Council's strong emphasis to reduce allowable density within our community has recently been broadly discussed in relation to the General Plan consistency hearings and the lot merger ordinance hearings. Because of this emphasis, concerns have been raised as to whether a higher density residential use should be considered for the City's Biltmore Site. If the Council is in agreement that only R-1 uses would be allowed under the residential option for this site, it will expedite the appraisal to eliminate the unnecessary work of appraising for unacceptable uses, i.e., R-2 and R-3. It should be noted that higher density residential uses would be consistent with the General Plan and zoning for surrounding property. However, consideration of such uses could readily be viewed as inconsistent with Council's strong emphasis to curb residential density in our community. 'Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager KBN/ld cc: Planning Department June 9, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council June 14, 1988 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO STUDY A MAXIMUM OF 2 UNITS PER LOT IN THE R-2 ZONE INITIATED BY COUNCILMEMBER ROGER CREIGHTON Recommendation Adopt attached resolution or direct staff as deemed appropriate. • Background At the May 24, 1988 City Council meeting, Councilmember Creighton requested that the maximum of 2 units per. lot in the R-2 zone be considered. Analysis Placing a maximum number of units for lots in the R-2 zone may limit density in some cases to'below what the current General Plan recommends. However, this factor would not be considered inconsistent since it is only inconsistent when the zoning allows for more than the General Plan allows. ' It should be noted that in consistently General Plan/zoned areas there are only a few lots that could have more than 2 units unless the lots were assembled into two or more (refer to attached staff report dated February 9, 1988). Attachments 1. .Staff report dated February 9, 1988. 2. City Council minutes dated 5/24/1988 & 2/9/1988. CONCUR: 'Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager " T/ccsr2uni Respectfully =' bnyitted, l'lichael 'Scl(ub'ach Planning Director 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF TO STUDY ALLOWING A MAXIMUM OF TWO UNITS PER LOT IN THE R-2 ZONE. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on June 14, 1988 and made the following Findings: A. The City Council is desirous of limiting density in the City; B. Limiting the maximum number of units per lot to two is consistent with the General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, Cal.ifornia, does hereby direct the Planning Commission and staff to study allowing a maximum of two units per lot in the R-2 zone. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June, 1988. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR o the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: T/ccrs2uni CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 I Eatitgrouttb Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 3, 1988 Regular Meeting of February 9, 1988 SUBJECT: STATISTICAL DATA ON R-2 ZONED LOTS WITH A POTENTIAL OF MORE THAN 2 UNITS INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation Receive and file report. Background • At the City Council meeting of January 26, 1988, the City Council requested that staff investigate the subject matter. Analysis At this time, the overall number of R-2 zoned lots in the City with the potential to have more than two units per lot is twelve (12). This figure is predicated on the following analysis: All R-2 lots except for those in the multi -use corridor and one other lot, which have a potential of more than two units per lot, are in non -consistent General Plan/zoned areas. Therefore the moratorium affects these lots, and the density must conform with low density standards. Only the eleven (11) lots in the multi -use commercial corridor, other than the one consistent lot could be built to R-2 standards and have more than 2 units; these lots could each have one additional unit. However, these lots were supposed to be General Plan down designated to medium density according to advisory measure E.E., and prior to the moratorium could have had high density development or commercial development. Consequently, the density on these lots has been significantly reduced. STATISTICAL INFORMATION ON R-2 LOTS WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR MORE THAN TWO (2) UNITS Total number of lots under current zoning that may have more than two units: 129 Potential number of units exceeding two units on lots noted above: 168 • Total number of subject lots in General Plan/Zoning inconsistent areas: 117 Total number of lots in multi -use commercial corridor with R-2 zoning: Total number of lots in consistent areas: Total number of subject lots affected by General Plan/Zoning inconsistency moratorium: After current downzoning is complete the potential number of units per lots exceeding two units per lot will equal: 117 1 If multi -use commercial corridor lots zoned R-2 are not rezoned to C-3, general commercial, then, the potential number of units over two units per lot will equal: 11 Overall potential total of lots in multi -use corridor and consistent areas with a potential of more than 2 units per lot: Attachment 1. Map of areas with large R-2 zoned lots delineated on General Plan map. 12 CONCUR: Alana Mastrian Acting City Manager Respectfully swbm ted Michael Schubach Planning Director 15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL (a) R-2 Limit - Creighton Councilmember Creighton requested that this matter be placed on the next City Council agenda. • - 5 - Minutes 5-24-88 (c) Statistical data on R-2 zoned lots with a potential of more than 2 units. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 3, 1988. Action: To receive and file this report. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Minutes 2-9-88