Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03/27/90
Honorable Mayor and Members of the. City Council March 21, 1990 City Council Meeting of March 27, 1990 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Responsible Agent April 10, 1990 Accept as complete, Highland Ave. CIP 85-102 Accepting as complete, work performed by Moffatt & Nichol Pier Repairs Traffic ordinance update Results of sewer bond analysis, CIP 89-407 Revision of Handbill Ordinance Audit request for proposal Request for use of Community Center for tree lot Community Center revenue and expenditures RFP for consultant services to prepare a records management system Overlay Valley/Ardmore/Prospect agreement with County Report on results of 6th St. storm drain cleaning Comparison of sanitary sewer design costs Criteria for sidewalk installation along suggested route to school streets r Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Safety Director Finance Director Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. General Services Dir. Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Hearing Certification of oil drilling EIR Planning Director - 1 - 1st quarter General Plan amendment - 1) General Plan amendment for oil drilling 2) Area 10 General Plan change 3) SE corner Artesia & Prospect Text amendment to Zoning Code for oil drilling April 24, 1990 Street Lighting District Assessment reso. approving report & setting public hearing Crossing Guards District Assessment reso. approving report & setting public hearing Quarterly Report - CIP Program Public Hearings Appeal of CUP amendment for Roberts Liquors, 74 Pier Ave. 17 ft. parking setback May 8, 1990 Slurry sealing, call for bids CIP 89-170 Call for bids - basketball courts CIP 89-512 May 22, 1990 Power Street drainage and grading CIP 88-406 Call for Bids - Sewers Target Area 4 May 24, 1990 - 6:00 p.m. Budget and Capital Improvement Program study session June 7, 1990 Second budget study session if needed June 12, 1990 Public Hearing Planning Director Planning Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Planning Director Planning Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Park & Rec. Master Plan amendment to open space element Planning Director Public Hearings Crossing Guard Assessment District Public Works Director Street Lighting Assessment District June 26, 1990 Award construction contract for basketball courts Public Hearing/Budget Adoption July 24, 1990 Accept sidewalk repairs as complete CIP 89-142 Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Caltrans utility maintenance agrmt. Public Works Director Vehicle parking on pedestrian streets Public Works Director Historic Preservation Ordinance (with Land Use Element) Planning Director New marquee proposal Community Resources ***************************************************************** Initiated by Party Date City Mgr. 2/27 Air Quality Control measures City Mgr. 2/27 Commuter Express Participation City Mgr. 3/15 County audit of Parking tickets C.R. 3/19 Farmers' Market 3 Planning Director Planning Director Finance Director CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS, Where there is no vis.ion the people perish. . HERMOSA BEACH `CITY COUNCIL ,AGENDA WELCOME!. By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest sand hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. ,' It is the policy of the City. Council that no discussion of new items will begin after. 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by_, the Council. The agendas\ are developed with the intent to' have all matters covered within the time allowed. ,NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in,the Council Chambers CITY VISION A less dense,/ _,, more family oriented , pleasant low profile, financia//y sound community 'comprised of' a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum cost are' borne by visitor/users; -led' by a C.4y Council which accepts a stewardship role for communiy resoUrce's and displays a willingness , to explore innovative alternatives,, and moves toward public policy leaderghip in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council ori October 23; 1986 • ..c THE'HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the • United States today. GLOSSARY • The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. • Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on•certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. i Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates go.vernment•revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications The public, :members of communicate to or make with the City Clerk by advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meetin Miscellaneous Items and Reports . City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen sincethe agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of the City Council may place items on .the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. . g - brings items. to the attention Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business district. "Sometimes the fool who rushes in gets the job done." -Al Bernstein AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, March 27, 1990 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 7:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR CITY CLERK Roger Creighton Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER Chuck Sheldon Gary L. Brutsch COUNCILMEMBERS CITY MANAGER Robert Essertier Kevin B. Northcraft Kathleen Midstokke CITY ATTORNEY Albert Wiemans Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PRESENTATION OF DONATION FOR HOLIDAY TREE LOT FROM HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the item is called. Citizen comments on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction will be provided time at the end of the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on March 13, 1990; 2) Special meeting of the City Council held on March 15, 1990. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Recommendation to receive and file the February, 1990 financial reports: 1) Revenue and Expenditure Report; 2) City Treasurer's Report. (e) Recommendation to award bids for restoration of baseball/soccer field at Valley Park and tree trimming on the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt, Hermosa Avenue medians, and Gould Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and El Oeste. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated March 19, 1990. Recommendation to receive and file report on charges to the Lighting and Crossing Guard Districts. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated March 21, 1990. Recommendation to receive and file report on current retention policy of tapes of City Council meetings. Memorandum from City Manager Kvein B. Northcraft dated March 21, 1990. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE FROM C-3, R-1, R-2, R-3, R -P AND SPA -2 (MOSTLY C-3) TO A COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR FROM SOUTHERN CITY BOUNDARY TO EIGHTH STREET ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 19, 1990. 6. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROCEDURE FOR VARIOUS TYPES OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS A MEANS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY AND TO REQUIRE ENVIRONMEN- TAL ASSESSMENT OF SUCH PROJECTS, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION AND RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 20, 1990. 7. FINAL CIRCULATION, TRANSPORTATION, AND PARKING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN, WITH RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 20, 1990. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. RECOMMENDATION RE. REPORT ON PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated March 5, 1990. (Continued from March 13, 1990 meeting.) 9. REVIEW OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS FOR ENTRY SIGNS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 27, 1990. (Continued from March 13, 1990 meeting.) 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL 12. OTHER MATTERS -'.CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. ADJOURNMENT a a • • • • 2 a .7 .• 2' 7. 71 111 21 1. 12 a• IF 1s 10 1• .7 411 11 • • e 1111 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H MIKE*COSTELLO WORK GUARANTEE REFUND •*• VENDOR TOTAL CITY -OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 PACE 0001 DATE 03/22/90 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ 11 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 03311 001-210-0000-2110 03/14/90 03598 11. 550.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE H EQUITABLE INSURANCE CO OF IOWA ANNUAL PREMIUM/E. DILLER - - *** VENDOR TOTAL $1.550.00 00830 001-400-1212-4188 01672 14,159.00 03/19/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-90 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-1 -TO- 3-15-90 --- - H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT - -• PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-90 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-90 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-29-90 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT ----------PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-90 - - - H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-90 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT --- ---PAYROLL-/2-16 TO 2-28-90 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/2-16 TO 2-28-90 **e VENDOR TOTAL 00243 001-202-0000-2030 03/01/90 00243 001-202-0000-2030 03/ 19/90 - - --- 14. 159. 00 00337 1191. 830.30 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00338 1266. 440. 81 "'ACCRUED PAYROLL 00243 105-202-0000-2030 00186 03/01/90 . ... 00243 110-202-0000-2030 00187 03/01/90 - - - — -- — 00243 145-202-0000-2030 00182 03/01/90 00243 155-202-0000-2030 00183 03/01/90... - - — 00243 160-202-0000-2030 00181 03/01/90 00243 170-202-0000-2030 03/01/90 - $6.018.24 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 144, 231.17 "'ACCRUED PAYROLL- $1,725.46 AYROLL- $1,725.46 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $3.328.04 ?ACCRUED PAYROLL 17. 553. 63 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00037 115. 155. 62 -/ACCRUED PAYROLL 00243 705-202-0000-2030 00144 03/01/90 111. 818.53 /ACCRUED PAYROLL H LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION SEMINAR REG/L. TERRY 1548.101.80 03315 001-400-4202-4316 00144 155.00 03/21/90 • •---PUB WK9 ADMIN /TRAINING 10636 . 32874 $0.00 03/21/90 10913 32878 $0.00 03/21/90 32739 10.00 03/21/90 32877 •-$0700--03/21/90 32739 $0:00 --03/21/90 00000 32739 $0-00--03/21/90 32739 $0700. 03/21/90 32739 -S0:-00-- -- 03/21/90 32739 $0:00 03/21/90 32739 $0:00-03/21/90. 32739 $0.00 03/21/90 11115 32879 $0.00 03/22/90 • .7 1 .a .. .I .• .• 7+ .I • • '-.4 4 -•111 : n.. ..;11 'I • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 - -- -----CITY-OF- HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 PACE 0002 DATE 03/22/90 • PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO 8 CHK * DATE INVC PROJ 11 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 5 • • •, • ,. • n •70 1, • " 7. 25 • 7e 27 • 29 • '] *** VENDOR TOTAL $55. 00 H ORANGE APA -NUTS AND BOLTS 03313 001-400-4101-4316 00173 $80.00 :,EMINAR REG/A.-- ANDERSON- *** VENDOR TOTAL - 03/-14/90- PLANNING - - /TRAINING $80. 00 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00383 $68,086.46 RE-TIREMENT- ADV/FEB 03/071 *** VENDOR TOTAL • n 3e 37 • " 10 RETIREMENT ----/RETIREMENT 10806 32876 --$0:-00---03/21 /90---- $68.086.46 32740 0312t/90 --- $68,086.46 3/2t/9©---- H ROUND ROCK 03312 001-210-0000-2110 03599 $1.575.00 83231 10537 32875 WORK -GUARANTEE -REFUND ---93231 09/14/90— — — — - /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE ---- --110.00 03/21/90--- *** VENDOR TOTAL *** PAY CODE TOTAL $1. 575. 00 $623,607.26 R AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSN 00401 001-400-4202-4315 00056 $225.00 65927 10684 32889 DUES/PUBLIC WORKS 65927 01/20/90 • PUB WKS ADMIN /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL •., .7 .J • .. .S • .7 .0 • e, sa • s., • sn $225. 00 $0:00 03/22/90 R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00857 001-400-2101-4306 00775 $129.00 4723 00033 32890 MISC CHARGES/MAR 90 • 4723 03/15/90 -- -.- POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE -- ., •---$0:00 03/22/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL $129. 00 R APOLLO LEASING COMPANY LTD 02558 001-400-3104-6900 00038 $841.29 -LEASE PMT/APRIL 90 - 03/15/90 --TRAFFIC SAFETY /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL $841. 29 00066 32891 $0.00 - 03/22/90 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-2201-4309 00840 $25.85 00017 32892 UTILITY RAO RENT/FEB 90.---- - -"- 02/28/90 • -------FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/22/90 v • 7. 7] 7. 7, PC 77 7* r1• 34 n ae ]d .7 43 14111 4. • 2 5 e • 13 17 e ,: 34 33 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R ARATEX/RED UTILITY RAG R ARATEX/RED --UTILITY RAO R ARATEX/RED • R UTILITY RAO ARATEX/RED UTILITY RAO STAR INDUSTRIAL RENT/FEB 90 STAR INDUSTRIAL RENT/FEB 90 STAR INDUSTRIAL RENT/FEB 90 STAR INDUSTRIAL RENT/FEB- 90 ---CITY-OF HERM09A BEACH-- DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND 8 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00152 001-400-3104-4309 00433 02/28/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00152 001-400-4204-4309 01598 02/28/90 BLDG MAINT 00152 001-400-4205-4309 00449 02/28/90 EQUIP SERVICE 00152 110-400-3302-4309 00659 02/28/90 PARKING ENF- PAGE 0003 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO * CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $11.00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $146.01 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $31.25 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $9.23 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************e*******e*******ee***a*********************** $223.34 R AVIATION LOCK & KEY ----MISC.-CHARGES/FEB. 90 *** R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC. CHARGES/FEB 90 R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC: CHARGES/FEB 90 - AVIATION LOCK & KEY • MISC. CHARGES/FEB 90- R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC: CHARGES/FEB 90 VENDOR' TOTAL 00407 001-400-2101-4309 00272 02/28/90 POLICE-- -- 00407 001-400-2101-4311 00839 02/28/90 POLICE 00407 001-400-4204-4309 01600 02/28/90 BLDG MAINT- • - 00407 001-400-6101-4309 00826 02/28/90 PARKS 00407 110-400-3302-4309 00661 02/28/90 - PARKING ENF. $25.36 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $17.35 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $20.92 -/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $11.79 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $43.66 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *119.08 R BANC ONE LEASING 99 02154 001-400-4205-6900 00056 $417.96 - -LEASE-PMT/APRIL- 90 - 03/15/90 -- EQUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BANCROFT WHITNEY CO. - PUBLICATIONS/PUB. WORKS- 86001- *** VENDOR TOTAL $417. 96 00802 001-400-4202-4305 00475 $44.80 02/09/90 - - PUB WKS ADMIN- /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R BANK OF AMERICA WI9NIEW9KI- $44.80 00180 001-400-2101-4316 00520 $33.05 02/28/90 - - -- -POLICE" /TRAINING 00017 32892 $0.00 03/22/90 00017 32892 $0.00- 03/22/90 00017 32892 $0.00'- 03/22/90 00017 32892 -----$0700----03/22/90 00025 32893 $0.00- - 03/22/90 00025 32893 $0.00 03/22/90 00025 32893 -$0.00----03/22/90 00025 32893 $0.00 03/22/90 00025 32893 i070G --03/22/90 00054 32894 $0.00 - -- 03/22/90 1586001 11104 32895 $0:-00-- -03/22/90 10761 32896 $0.00..--. 03/22/90 1 4 3 . e e r' e 13 21 zn 30 is ., 11 11 'J. ec 56 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION — C -TY -OF- HERMOSA -BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 8 AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PACE 0004 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO K CHK 8 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL R ROBERTA*BARRON ---• SPRING CLASS REFUND *** VENDOR TOTAL 03310 001-300-0000-3826 93518 - 03/12/90 $33.05 00819 $7.00 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES R BAYSHORE CONCRETE CO. -- --- - WORK GUARANTEE REFUND -- --82591- *** VENDOR TOTAL 03303 001-210-0000-2110 03/15/90 *7. 00 93518 10454 32897 $0:00 03/22/90 03609 $125.00 82591 10538 32898 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE --- ---------$0--00----03121/90 - R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY -MISC-CHARGES/FEB 90----- - -- R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHARGES/FEB 90 - R BEACH CITIES OFFICE MISC-CHARGES/FEB 90 -- 3125. 00 02509 001-400-2101-4305 01206 $45.60 02/28/90 POLICE 02509 001-400-2201-4305 00336 02/28/90 -- FIRE /OFFICE -OPER SUPPLIES $17.04 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES SUPPLY 02509 001-400-3104-4309 00435 $11.17 — -- 02128/90--------TRAFFIC-SAFETY- /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHARGES/FEB 90 02509 001-400-4201-4305 00544 02/28/90 BUILDING R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509 MISC CHARGES/FEB 90 . - - - - ------ 02/28/90 R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC CHARGES/FEB 90 001-400-6101-4309 00827 PARKS --- - $36.87 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $11.29 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 02509 110-400-3302-4309 00662 $27.33 02/28/90 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BLICKMAN. INC. THEATRE TECH/MAR 3-10 $149.30 03092 001-400-4601-4201 005273455.00 03/13/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 $455. 00 01308 001-400-1212-4188 01677 $78.04 03/15/90 --EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00249 32899 ---$0:00 --03/22/90 00249 32899 $0:00 03/22/90 00249 32899 $0700-- 03/22/90-- 00249 32899 *0.00 03/22/90 00249 32899 30:00 --03/22/90 • 00249 32899 $0:00 - . 03/22/90 10457 32900 $0.00 03/21/90 ,00055 32901 $0.00 03/22/90 s e1• • • . • • ;1 • �.I a. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • • 2 e e 0 11 1! v ]: .3 35 ,E FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 16:59:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY -OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 01308 145-400-3401-4188 00863 $0.69 03/15/90 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01308 145-400-3402-4188 00865 $0.27 03/15/90 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED - CITY HEALTH INS/APR-90 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED ----CITY--HEALTH -INS/APR -90 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITU HEALTH INS/APR 90 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED —CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90---- ----- R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 *** VENDOR TOTAL 19 ,0 47 44 .n 44. 51 01293 03/15/90 01293 03/15/90 01293 03/15/90 01293 03/15/90- 001-400-1212-4188 01678 PACE 0005 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO N CHK 3 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 379. 00 $13.554.32 -EMP-BENEFITS -----/EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS - 110-400-3302-4188 01129 PARKING ENF $677.06 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 145-400-3401-4188 00864 $17.08 - DIAL A --RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS • 145-400-3402-4188 00866 $6.83 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01293 705-400-1209-4188 00230 $125.42 03/15/90-- 01293 03/15/90 ----------LIABILITY-INS --/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS --- 705-400-1217-4188 00229 $236.93 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R BRAUN LINEN SERVICE PRISONER LAUNDRY/FEB 90 70664 *** VENDOR TOTAL 00163 001-400-2101-4306 02/28/90 - - ------ POLICE $14,617.64 00776 $191.39 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE R MARK*BRIGGS & ASSOCIATES. INC. CDBO ADMIN SERV/FEB 90 403-8 $191.39 00055 32901 $0.00 03/22/90 00055 32901 -$0:00--- 03/22/90 00056 32902 ----$0:00---03/22/90 -S0.:00---03/22/90 00056 32902 $0.00-- 03/22/90 00056 32902 30.00-- 03/22/90 00056 32902 $0.00 03/22/90 00056 32902 -$0:00----03/22/90 00056 32902 $0.00 03/22/90 070664 00028 32903 $0.00 -- 03/22/90 02478 140-400-4703-4201 00015 $741.30 403-8 10805 02/28/90 CDBO ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************a*************************************** R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES TRASH PICKUP/MARCH 90 $741.30 00155 001-400-1208-4201 00633 $507.49 03/01/90 --- -GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 32904 03/22/90 00005 32905 $0.00 03/22/90 • • r /' 2 R • • 1 2 3 e 7 6 0 2 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION -e}TY-OF- HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ 8 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES TRASH PICKUP/MARCH 90 PACE 0006 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO 8 CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00155 110-400-3301-4201 00252 $516.63 03/01/90 VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** n 6 * * * R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00158 001-400-3103-4201 00264 DUMP- EHARGE9/FEB-90----37002---------02/28/90---------- - ---ST-MAINTENANCE- $1, 024- 12 00005 32905 $0.00 03/22/90 $3.350.98 900200-0037002 00004 32906 /CONTRACT- SERVICE/PRIVAT--. $0.-00 03/22/90 VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3.350.98 21 2 24 .12 :J 35 36 3, 10 39 4, 42 AA A5 40 49 5 5, 5 53 54 55 56 R QARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 3-15 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER --REINA-PETTY CASH/TO 3-15 ---- R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 3-15 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER - --- - REIMB-PETTY CASH/TO-3-15---- -- R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER -REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 3-15 • - --- R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER -REIMB-PETTY CASH/TO-3-15- R QARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 3-15 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER ---------------REIMB- PETTY CASH/TO-3-15 ----- - R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 3-15 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMB -PETTY-CASH/TO--3-15-- R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER -REIMB--PETTY CASH/TO 3-15 - --- 02016 001 03/19/90 02016 001 03/19/90--- 02016 001 03/19/90 02016 001 03/19/90-- - 02016 001 03/19/90 02016 001 —03/19190 02016 001 03/19/90 - 02016 001 03/19/90-- ---- 02016 001 03/19/90 02016 001 -03/19/90 ---- 02016 001 - 03/19/90-- -400-2201-4310 3/ 19/90 -- - -- - - - 400-1205-4316 00063 CABLE TV -400-1206-4305 00432 /TRAINING *8. 50 $4.48 •-----DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES - 400-2101-4305 POLICE 01201 $43.37 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES -400-2101-4311 00835 $12.28 POLICE- -400-2101-4316 00519 00519 --POLICE- -- /AUTO-MAINTENANCE $49.06 /TRAINING - 400-2201-4309 00837 $41.15 -F-IRC -400-2201-4310 -- FIRE - --/MAINTENANCE-MATERIALS 00110 $15.75 /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES -400-2201-4311 00320 $5.00 - - FIRE --- -- /AUTO MAINTENANCE -400-3103-4311 00538 9T MAINTENANCE $15.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE -400-4102-4305 00101 $12.90 PLANNING COMM--- /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES -400-4202-4305 00473 $11.69 - PUB WK9 ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 10552 32908 $0.00 03/22/90 10552 --$0:00- 32908 03/22/90 10552 32908 $0.00 03/22/90 10552 32908 $O: 00-03/22/90 10552 32908, ----$0:140---03/22/90 10552 32908 --$0700----03/22/90- 10552 32908 $0.00 03/22/90 10552 32908 $0:00 03/22/90 10552 32908 $0..00 03/22/90 10552 32908 -.30:00-- 03/22/90 10552 32908 $0.00 03/22/90 • 01 A ,o 22,' 231 A 5 [II 4 /10 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • II I; 14 'e I) I! .e ,0 .31 51 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY-OF-HERMOSA -BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 3-15 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER --REIMB PETTY CASH/T0 3-15 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER -REIMB PETTY CASH/T0 3-15 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 3-15----- 02016 001-400-4601-4305 00803 03/19/90 - COMM RESOURCES 02016 001-400-4601-4308 00262 -03/19/90 - - COMM RESOURCES 02016 105-400-2601-4310 00071 03/19/90- - STREET LIGHTING 02016 110-400-3302-4305 00666 03/19/90 PARKING ENF- PAGE 0007 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO 8 CHK A AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 324. 19 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $15.59 /PROGRAM MATERIALS $30.00 /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.95 /OFFICE- OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $289.81 R BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE -SUBSCRIPTION/POLICE------95239 *** VENDOR TOTAL 00253 001-400-2101-4305 03/14/90 POLICE - 01204 3195. 48 /OFFICE -OPER SUPPLIES R LAURIE*BYREN 03295 001-300-0000-3826 --SPRING CLASS REFUND ----- -92024 03/06/90 — $195.48 10552 32908 $0.00 03/22/90 10552 32908 $0.00- - 03/22/90 10552 32908 $0.00 03/22/90 10552 32908 -*0:00 03/22/90 695239 10757 32909 -$0:00- - 03/22/90 00817 $50.00 92024 10442 32910 IREC PROGRAMS/CLASSES -*0:00 - 03/21/90- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00 R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, I PARKS MAINT/FEB 90 NC. 00599 001-400-3101-4201 00038 — -- 02/28/90 — MEDIANS— .- R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. PARKS MAINT/FEB 90 00599 001-400-6101-4201 02/28/90 PARKS $3, 150. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00175 $10,025.62 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $13,175.62 R CA MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOC. ANNUAL DUES/G. BRUTSCH 00598 001-400-1141-4315 00031 $75.00 03/15/90 CITY TREASURER /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CAL POLY KELLOGG UNIT FOUND. TUITION/CARUSO/ALTFELD 27-28 00677 001-400-2101-4312 03/13/90 -- -- - POLICE $75.00 00061 32911 $0:00-- 03/22/90 00061 32911 $0.00 03/22/90 10551 $0.00 01193 $79.84 AR001827-28 10274 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 32912 03/21/90 32913 03/21/90 • 2 4 • e i /* e 2 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 2, r :7 24 5 2,! 2.) • a fib • • Oh ,5 C1TY—OF HERMOSA--BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND K ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CANADA LIFE ------CITY-HEALTH INS/APR 90 PAGE 0008 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $79. 84 00046 001-400-1212-4188 01673 $735.30 03/15/90 -- EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $735.30 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH-INS/APR 90 30 4, 42 4, 44 45 17 ,,, 54 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R CANADA LIFE CITY -HEALTH INS/APR-90 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R CANADA LIFE CITY -HEALTH INS/APR--90 CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 00239 001-400-1212-4188 01684 $3,132.51 03/15/90- ---- -- EMP- BENEF ITS - -----/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00239 105-400-2601-4188 00922 $99.63 03/15/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00239 110-400-3301-4188 00865 $4.15 03/15/90 — — VEH PKG. DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -- 00239 110-400-3302-4188 01132 $573.94 • 03/15/90 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00239 145-400-3401-4188 00868 $5.16 ' 03/15/90 — DIAL -A -RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS --- 00239 145-400-3402-4188 03/15/90 ESEA 00870 - $1.76 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00239 145-400-3403-4188 00252 $1.95 03/15/90 -- — — -BUS PASS SUBSDY--/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS --- 00239 155-400-2102-4188 00486 $14.45 03/15/90 -- CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R CANADA LIFE 00239 160-400-3102-4188 00864 $94.78 C-ITY HEALTH INS/APR-90 03/15/90 — — -SEWER/ST—DRAIN---/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R CANADA LIFE CITY -HEALTH INS/APR 90 -- ----------- 00239 705-400-1209-4188 00234 $17.77 03/15/90 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00239 705-400-1217-4188 00233 $6.31 03/15/90 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3,952.41 R JEANNE*CARUSO MEALS/TRAINING CLASS 03293 001-400-2101-4313 - 03/06/90 --- -•- ... --POLICE POLICE 00252 $103. 50 /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC 00008 32914 - 1610:00-- 03/22/90' 00022 32915 $0700-03/22/90-- 00022 32915 $0:00 — 03/22/90 00022 32915 $0:-00 ----03/22/90 00022 32915 $0.00 03/22/90 00022 32915 —$0:00---03/22/90 00022 32915 $0.00 03/22/90 00022 32915 00022 32915 $0.00- 03/22/90 00022 32915 $0-00---03/22/90--- 00022 32915 $0.00 03/22/90 00022 32915 $0.00 03/22/90 10264 32916 $0. 00 . • 03/22/90 e 27 74 77 • • S S • S 14 51 0% • • • • • • • • • • • • * • • 9 II FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 1658:27 •€1TY-OF-HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 --------- ------- PACE 0009 DATE 03/22/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VND ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4 CHK DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL -• $103. 50 R J. I.*CASE CREDIT CORP. 01147 160-400-3102-6900 00108 $748.32 —LEASE PMT/APRIL-90 -03/15/90- SEWER/ST DRAIN /LEASE PAYMENTS • *** VENDOR TOTAL 2C ;.` 24 25 28 37 30 )7 30 3o 11 $748. 32 R CDS NATIONAL USERS GROUP 02877 001-400-2101-4315 00165 $100.00 ANNUAL DUES/STRASER 03/06/90 -POLICE 'MEMBERSHIP - *** VENDOR TOTAL R CELLULAR DYNAMICS COMPANY MOBILE PHONE CHOS/JAN-90 *** VENDOR TOTAL $100. 00 00021. 32917 --SO-00---03/22/90---- 10749 32918 -- 02449 001-400-2101-4311 00837 $466.82 00110 32919 01/27/90 POLICE /AUTO -MAINTENANCE $0700----03/22/90 $466. 82 R CENTER FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE 02000 001-400-2101-4312 01199 $211.00 TUITION/W. KELLY 03/06/90 POLICE- -/TRAVEL-EXPENSE POST- *** VENDOR TOTAL R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT -----MISC-CHARGES/MAR 90 CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT TYPEWRITER REPAIR/POLICE 2026 *** VENDOR TOTAL 13 44 4r 40 It. 51 "14 58 33 $211. 00 00389 001-400-1141-4305 00105 $16.01 03/15/90- -CITY TREASURER---/OFFICE-OPER SUPPLIES------- - 00389 001-400-2101-4305 01202 $153.55 03/07/90 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC CHARGES/MAR 90- 00014 001-400-2101-4311 00840 - - 03/15/90 • POLICE $169. 56 $606. 60 /AUTO MAINTENANCE R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-4204-4311 00137 $87.63 -P11-SE-CHARGES/MAR 90 03115/90 BLDO MAINT /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL R CHEVRON USA. INC. •MISD-CHARGES/FEB 90 $694. 23 10273 32920 '0.00 -03/22/90 - 00311 32921 -110-7-00---03/22/90 2026 10748 32921 40: 00-03/22/90 00312 32922 $0.00 03/22/90 00312 32922 --11000--03/22/90 00634 001-400-2101-4310 00242 $230.55 00265 32923 02i28/90 -POLICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES -SO. 00--------03/22/90 4 231 5 I 12 :41 17 /1 111, 1,1 115 rn Al I 4 4 4 4 4 111 • • 1"- 4 4 2 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ITY-0E- -HERMO9A--BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 0 *** VENDOR TOTAL R CINTAS CORPORATION IFORM RENTAL/FEB -90------ — n e iv 24 '- 70 2'! :0 9- ]2 13 3.. I" 35 3n n fok le 30 42 44 41 40 44 53 ee • R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM-RENTAL/FEB-90 *** VENDOR TOTAL PAGE 0010 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $230.55 00153 001-400-4202-4187 00137 $436.88 -----02/28/90 — PUB WKS -ADMIN- /UNIFORM -ALLOWANCE 00153 110-400-3302-4187 00225 $42.00 02/28/90 -- - -- --- PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE R MARYMAE*CIOFFI SPRING CLASS REFUND *** VENDOR TOTAL 03294 001-300-0000-3826 92007 03/06/90 *478.88 00818 $30.00 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES R COLORADO CHAPTER EDUC. COMM. - SEMINAR REG/J. GEORGINO *** VENDOR TOTAL $30.00 03292 001-400-4201-4316 00199 $250.00 03/10/90 - ------BUILD/NO /TRAINING- 00017 TRAINING- R COM SYSTEMS. INC --LONG DISTANCE/JAN 90 - 86512 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN-90 --a65112--- COM 8651-2-- COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 01/30/90 001-400-1121-4304 00273 -CITY CLERK 00017 001-400-1141-4304 00292 01/30/90 -EITY—TREASURER 00017 001-400-1201-4304 00318 -LONG-DISTANCE/JAN 90 -- 86512- 01/30/90 R COM SYSTEMS. INC -- LONG-DISTANCE/JAN 90 CITY -MANAGER 00017 001-400-1202-4304 00317 86512--- 01/30/90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 00 -LONG DISTANCE/JAN 90 - 86512--- - 01/30/90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC --LONG DISTANCE/JAN-90- —86512 R COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN 90 FINANCE --ADMIN 1-400-1203-4304 00324 PERSONNEL 00017 001-400-2101-4304 00521 01/30/90 POLICE $250.00 $7.04 /TELEPHONE $10.27 /TELEPHONE — - $14.93 /TELEPHONE $32.37 -/TELEPHONE $38.59 /TELEPHONE $196.47 -/TELEPHONE - 00017 001-400-2401-4304 00290 $7.15 86512 01/30/90 - ------ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE 00002 32924 ---$0700 -03/22/90-- 00002 32924 $0:00 03/22/90 92007 10446 32925 $0.00 03/21/90 10357 32926 --$0-00 --- 03/22/90 00186512 00017 32927 - *0:00-03/22/90 00186512 00115 32927 •410A)0---03/22/90- 00186512 0: 00---03/22/90- 00186512 00115 32927 $0.00 - 03/22/90 00186512 00115 32927 S0:00-03/22/90 00186512 00115 32927 $0:00 - 03/22/90 00186512 00115 32927 -- $0700— —03/22/90- 00186512 00017 32927 $0.00 03/22/90 • 2 • 6, • e e :4 . .e 23 8- .7r1 ,{4 A • • • • s • • i • • r • r • • • $ • • e e 14 I) ,. :n 37, 1,1 4.7 an 51 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN 90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN 90 R COM SYSTEMS. INC - LONG DISTANCE/JAN 90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN--90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN 90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC ---- — LONG- DISTANCE/JAN--90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN 90 CITY -OF-HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00017 001-400-4101-4304 00319 $22.56 86512 01/30/90 PLANNING /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-4201-4304 00307 433.58 86512 ---- 01/30/90 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-4202-4304 00324 450.50 86512 01/30/90 - PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-4601-4304 00366 453.02 86512--------01 /30/90- - — COMM RESOURCES ---/TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-6101-4304 00211 410.27 86512 01/30/90 PARKS /TELEPHONE 00017 105-400-2601-4304 00136 $8.45 — 96512— -- 01/30/90— STREET -LIGHTING -/TELEPHONE 00017 110-400-3302-4304 00320 $103.44 86512 01/30/90 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE PAGE 0011 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO N CHK K AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $588.64 R CSULB FOUNDATION SEM REG/M. ERNST 00349 001-400-4601-4316 00130 $275.00 03/15/90 COMM RESOURCES /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R R R DAPPER TIRE CO. MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 01390 001-400-2101-4311 03/15/90 POLICE DAPPER TIRE CO. 01390 -MSC: -CHARGES/MAR 90 — — — -03/15/90 DAPPER TIRE CO. MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 $275. 00 00838 $120. 29 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 001-400-4205-4311 00170 $158.46 EQUIP SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 01390 110-400-3302-4311 00574 $116.67 03/15/90 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE & SHELTER COSTS/FEB 90 $395.42 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00127 $272.10 03/10/90 - ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 00186512 00186512 00186512 00115 32927 40.00 03/22/90 00017 32927 $0: 00 • - - 03/22/90 00115 32927 $0.00 03/22/90 00186512 00017 32927 ----$0.-00 —03/22/90 00186512 00017 32927 $0.00 03/22/90 00186512 00017 32927 40:00 03/22/90 00186512 00017 32927 $0:00 03/22/90 10460 32928 $0.00 03/21/90 00317 32929 $0.00 03/22/90 00317 32929 50.00 03/22/90 00317 32929 $0.00 03/22/90 00014 32930 40.00 03/22/90 3 4 0 6 0 v V"' f" • • • • • FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION -CITY-OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 24 I5 I, *** VENDOR TOTAL a*******ww***********+►w*w*ww********w*www*******w*a***craw***w*a***** $272.10 R DERBY DINKS TRUCK PAINTING 03291 105-400-2601-4311 00166 $1,984.24 --------- REPAIR HI -LIFT -TRUCK - 22701 - 03/15/90 --STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************w****************************** $1,984.24 R DIGITAL COMPUTER R DIGITAL COMPUTER EGUIPMENT CORPORATION MAINT/MAR -90 -----58990 EQUIPMENT 'CORPORATION MAINT/MAR 90 58990 00269 001-400-2101-4201 00537 03/01/90 -POLICE . 00269 001-400-2201-4201 03/01/90 FIRE PAGE 0012 DATE 03/22/90 PO 3 CHK UNENC DATE EXP 22701 10672 32931 $832.20 249358990 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT -- --- 00125 $554.80 249358990 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 35 40 • 39 4, R DIVE N' SURF MISC CHARGES/MAR 90 00604 001-400-2201-4309 03/15/90 FIRE $1,387.00 00842 $87.00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SHERRI*DRUITT DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND *** VENDOR TOTAL 4I 41 44 45 4, 46 5 55 50 * * * 03299 001-210-0000-2110 92020 03/15/90 $87.00 *000 -- 03/22/90 00068 32932 00068 32932 $0.00 03/22/90 00320 32933 $0.00 03/22/90 03602 $100.00 92020 10549 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 R E & E AUTO BODY TRUCK BODY REPAIR/P.W. $100.00 03290 001-400-3103-4311 00540 $1,000.00 3069 02/26/90 - -"ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE VENDOR TOTAL******************.****.*******w************************************** R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY - IBM METER USE/JAN 90 - 20971 R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY _._IMB-COPIER MAINT/FEB-- 90-- 20871----- -- 41, 000. 00 32934 03/21/90 3069 10685 32935 $0700- 03/22/90 02840 001-400-1208-4201 00634 $227.84 006-M20871 00268 03/04/90 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT - $0.00 02840 001-400-1208-4201 00635 03/04/90 - GEN-APPROP. - $255.00 006-M20871 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT - *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************a*****a***************** R EASTMAN, INC. --- --MISC-CHAROES/MARCH 90 $482.84 02514 001-400-1208-4305 00733 $423.78 03/15/90 - -- AEN-APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 32936 03/22/90 00268 32936 $0.00 - 03/22/90 00366 32937 *0. 00 --03/22/90 03/22/90 • •I i ►. 4 4 5 6 7 e_ 0 ,0 • TriF 41 641 0,1 • • • • • 2 • • • • • • • • 1) 12 ,3 .14 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITV-OF -HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************a******************** R EASY READER PUBLIC NOTICING/FEB 90 0268 PAGE 0013 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO * CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $423.78 00181 001-400-1121-4323 00093 $686.70 02/28/90 - CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R THE*ECONOMICS PRESS. INC. -- ---PUBLICATIONS/FINANCE ---- 194-6 - $686.70 00704 001-400-1202-4316 00292 $39.00 - 02/20/90 --- FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 MISC-CHCS/FEB 90 — -- 02/28/90 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHOS/FEB 90 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS - MISC CHOS/FEB.90 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHOS/FEB 90 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHCS/FEB 90 - R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHCS/FEB 90 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS -MISC.CHOS/FEB 90 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHOS/FEB 90 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC-CHOS/FEB 90 001-400-2101-4311 00834 POLICE ------- $39. 00 $712.72 /AUTO MAINTENANCE - 00165 001-400-2201-4311 00319 $74.35 02/28/90 FIRE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-2401-4311 00181 $41.01 02/28/90 - - ANIMAL --CONTROL /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-3103-4311 00537 $132.76 02/28/90 9T MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 0268 00267 32938 .$0:00- 03/22/90 M-2977194-6 00104 32939 ---$0:00-- 03/22/90 00165 001-400-4205-4309 00448 $188.55 --02/28/90 -- - --EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00165 001-400-4205-4311 00169 $94.37 02/28/90 EQUIP SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 105-400-2601-4309 00580 $206.01 02/28/90 - -------STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00165 110-400-3302-4311 00573 $121.21 02/28/90 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 160-400-3102-4311 00143 $56.28 02/28/90 - SEWER/9T-DRAIN--/AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY - LEASE-PMT/APRIL 90 - $1,627 26 02354 001-400-3103-6900 00048 $1,736.78 03/15/90 -ST MAINTENANCE /LEASE PAYMENTS 00222 32940 $0.00 -03/22/90 00222 32940 $0.00 03/22/90 00222 32940 41000---03/22/90 00222 • 32940 $0.00 03/22/90 00222 32940 - 110.00 - - 03/22/90 00222 32940 $0.00 03/22/90 00222 32940 $0.00 - 03/22/90 00222 32940 $0.00 03/22/90 00222 32940 • -$0: 00----• 03/22/90 00060 32941 $0.00 03/22/90 2 3 e e e 11 „ 12 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 16:58:27- 1 3 6:58:27- 1, 14 .r PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION -----EITY-OF HERMOSA-BEACH -- DEMAND - DEMAND LIST PAGE 0014 FOR 03/27/90 DATE 03/22/90 NND 8 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK Si DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP www VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************www******sem******* $1.736.78 R EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICES INC. 01294 001-400-4204-4201 00368 $1.325.00 046/039 00062 32942 JANITOR SERV/FEB 90 6/039 02/28/90 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT' $0:00-----03/22/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************ $1. 325.00 R TRUDY*FALLON 03306 001-300-0000-3405 00901 $37.50 82498 10450 32943 ROOM -RENTAL REFUND .----82498--- -- 03/08/90 - — /COMM CTR -RENTAL -9 21, 2 :J 70 J, 55 v 12 *** VENDOR TOTAL $37.50 --$0760--- 03 /21 /90 - -'- R MICHAEL*FAYE ASSOCIATES 03223 001-400-2101-4305 01203 $213.50 17262 10184 32944 -L-INE--DRAWING/PD BADGE--- -17262-- -- 03/09/90 /OFFICE--OPER'SUPPLIES $213:50 03/22/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL $213.50 R BONNIE*FIETZ 03316 110-300-0000-3302 32360 $28.00 654277 00114 32945 CITE PAYMENT REFUND' -54277 - 03/22/90 /COURT-FINES/PARKING - -0_-00---03/22/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 41 42 4:, .,I 45 40 49 51 5} 571 55 5, * * * *28. 00 R PHILLIP*FREEMAN 01324 001-210-0000-2110 03604 $1.575.00 83216 10546 32946 WORK -GUARANTEE-REFUND-------83216-- 03/15/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE ----------- --$0-00---03/21/90--- VENDOR TOTAL $1. 575. 00 R JANET*FURNEE' 02610 001-400-4601-4201 00528 $35.00 - 10449 32947 THEATRE-TECH/MARCH--5r90 -- - 03/08/90 — -COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT'SERVICE/PRIVAT---- -----$0:00-----03/21/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL R GATES MC DONALD -- RE-IMB -WORKERS -COMP/FEB90- *** VENDOR TOTAL $35.00 ' 02596 705-400-1217-4182 00131 $32.545.48 10915 32948 -- 02/28/90 -- ---------WORKERS-COMP--- --/WORKERS-COMP CURRENT YR - - -- ---$0-00------03/22/90 *************************************************** --- $32,545.48 R GATES. MCDONALD & COMPANY 02538 705-400-1217-4201 00070 $1,333.34 137330000402 00044 32949 ---ADMIN-SERV/MARCH -90------00402------03/02/90-------------WORKERS. COMP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0:-00- 03/22/90 !1 1CFie r 3 e .r Ill 4l• • • :1• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 e 12 15 I0 24 ]' 1J N 3, 10 10 II 40 11 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY -OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** PAGE 0015 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO N CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1,333.34 R GEORGE & AL'S AUTO TOP SHOP 01748 160-400-3102-4311 00144 $160.13 REPAIR SEAT/SEWER TRUCK - 0231 - - 03/12/90 - SEWER/ST DRAIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/MAR 90 ...-0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHCS/MAR 90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHO9/MAR 90 -0200- R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CH09/MAR 90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED - DIRECT DIAL CHO9/MAR 90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHCS/MAR 90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED --DIRECT DIAL CHOS/MAR -90----0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHCS/MAR 90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED --DIRECT DIAL CHG9/MAR 90 -0200----- R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHOS/MAR 90 -0200 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00279 03/01/90- -CITY -COUNCIL - 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00272 03/01/90 CITY CLERK 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00199 03/01/90 CITY -ATTORNEY 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00291 03/01/90 CITY TREASURER 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00317 03/01/90 -- CITY -MANAGER - 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00316 03/01/90 FINANCE ADMIN 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00323 03/01/90 -- -PERSONNEL 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00215 03/01/90 DATA PROCESSING 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00179 --03/01/90 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED --------DIRECT DIAL CI-QS/MAR 90 -0200 --- R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHCS/MAR 90 -0200 BUS LICENSE 00015 001-400-1208-4304 00049 03/01/90 GEN APPROP 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00520 -03/01/90- ... - -- --- POLICE - - 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00241 03/01/90 FIRE $160.13 $5. 53 /TELEPHONE $15.80 /TELEPHONE $7.89 /TELEPHONE $11.84 /TELEPHONE $13.42 /TELEPHONE $51.32 /TELEPHONE $18.95 /TELEPHONE -- $23. 68 /TELEPHONE $15. 79 /TELEPHONE $7.89 /TELEPHONE $318.62 /TELEPHONE $7.89 /TELEPHONE 0231 10681 32950 $0.400 03/22/90 318-0200 318-0200 318-0200 318-0200 318-0200 00362 32952 *0.00- 03/22/90 00362 32952 $0.00 03/22/90 00362 32952 $0.00-- 03/22/90 00362 32952 $0.00 03/22/90 00362 32952 $0.00- 03/22/90 318-0200 00362 32952 $0.00 03/22/90 318-0200 00362 32952 $070O.._ __.03/22/90 318-0200 00015 32952 $0.00 03/22/90 318-0200 00015 32952 $0.00 03/22/90 318-0200 00015 32952 $0.00 03/22/90 318-0200 00015 32952 $0.00- 03/22/90 318-0200 00015 32952 $0.00 03/22/90 7 e 4 11 12 u 14 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY -OF- HERMOSA --BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION :1 24 23 26 777 :9 3e 31 3J 35 36 37 ]e .30 11 42 47 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHCS/MAR 90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED DIRECT -DIAL CHAS/MAR-90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED ------ --DIRECT DIAL CHOS/MAR 90: -0200-- GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHAS/MAR-90---0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHOS/MAR 90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT-DIAL--CHAS/MAR-90--0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHCS/MAR 90 -0200 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00289 03/01/90 ANIMAL CONTROL 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00318 03/01/90 - PLANNING -- 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00306 03/01/90 - -- - BUILDING, 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00323 03/01/90- PUB WKS ADMIN 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00365 03/01/90 COMM RESOURCES 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00210 03/01/90--- .- -- - - -PARKS-- - *11. 84 /TELEPHONE *39. 47 /TELEPHONE $63.16 /TELEPHONE *79. 74 /TELEPHONE *15.80 /TELEPHONE PAGE 0016 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO M CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 318-0200 00015 32952 *0.00 03/22/90 318-0200 00362 32952 *0:00-- 03/22/90 318-0200 00362 32952 *0.00 03/22/90 318-0200 00362 32952 -$0700---03/22/90 318-0200 00362 32952 *0.00 03/22/90 *7.89 318-0200 00362 32952 /TELEPHONE - 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00319 *91.58 03/01/90 PARKING-ENF--- /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL ******ww**********w*********www******w*www*********************www** R GTEL EQUIPMENT RENT/MAR 90-- 44 4,. .7 41 49 5 51 12 53 54 55 511 R GTEL EQUIPMENT--RENT/MAR- 90--- ------ *** VENDOR TOTAL *808.16 01340 001-400-2101-4304 00523 *46.23 03/01/90 POLICE - /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-4601-4304 00367 *99.72 ---03/01490-------------COMM-RESOURCES-/TELEPHONE R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH -INS/APR-90 R GUARDIAN DENTAL ---CITY HEALTH INS/APR *145. 95 02623 001-400-1212-4188 01675 *2,179.59 03/15/90 — —-EMP-BENEFITS.----./EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 105-400-2601-4188 00917 '*4.20 90 - - 03/15/90 -- ----STREET LIGHTING -/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R GUARDIAN DENTAL -- G-IT-V---HEAL-TH - INS/APR- 90 - GUARDIAN DENTAL - --CITU HEALTH INS/APR 02623 110-400-3302-4188 01127 *104.73 03/15/90 - --- PARKING -ENF - -----/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 145-400-3401-4188 00862 *2.22 90 03/15/90 - DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - -*0:00 - -03/22/90 318-0200 00015 32952 - - -110:.00- 03/22/90 00326 32953 *0.00 03/22/90 00326 32953 *0. 00---03/22/90 - 00001 3295.4 *070,0-03/22/90 00001 32954 - *0.00 03/22/90 00001 32954 -- *0.00-- .03/22/90 00001 32954 *0.00 03/22/90 • 01: • • 45 d :,S 713 7: IP • ,n 7IP 411 i •1 5541111110 ♦11 ; . r :• • e 1. 15 17 • • • 0 0 11 713 41 • • FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R GUARDIAN DENTAL -CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R GUARDIAN DENTAL —CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90- R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 *** VENDOR TOTAL VND DATE INVC CITY—OF HERMOSA BEACH - DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN k AMOUNT PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02623 145-400-3402-4188 00864 03/15/90 ESEA 02623 145-400-3403-4188 00249 03/15/90 -- BUS PASS SUBSDY 02623 160-400-3102-4188 00859 03/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN 02623 705-400-1209-4188 00228 03/15/90 ----LIABILITY INS 02623 705-400-1217-4188 00227 03/15/90 WORKERS COMP $1. 14 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $3. 43 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PAGE 0017 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO N CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $27. 30 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $28. 66 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $33. 91 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. ELGIN SWEEPER REPAIR 13780 $2,385.18 00731 001-400-3103-4311 00539 $210.92 03/08/90 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $210.92 R FRANK B. *HALL & CO. OF CALIF. BONDS/BRUTSCH/NORTHCRAFT 45478 00001 32954 $0.00 03/22/90 00001 32954 $0.00 03/22/90 00001 32954 $0.00 03/22/90 00001 32954 •--$0:00-- 03/22/90 00001 32954 $0.00 03/22/90 1C13780 10682 32955 $0.00 03/22/90 03147 705-400-1210-4201 00049 $858.50 545477/545478 10910 32956 03/02/90 AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/22/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $858.50 R FRANKLIN D.*HARDISON CITE PAYMENT REFUND 66552 03289 110-300-0000-3302 03/08/90 32357 $18. 00 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY COMPUTER SYS MAINT/MAR90 K1968 $18. 00 866552 00107 32957 $0.00 03/22/90 00149 001-400-1206-4201 00690 $1,223.00 27K1868 00009 32958 03/01/90 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/22/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.223.00 R HOLLIT CONSTRUCTION WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 83229 03/15/90 03297 001-210-0000-2110 03600 $575.00 83229 10542 32959 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 03/21/90 • S • • • • r r- • • • • S l 2 e e „ 2 15 n ,n 21 24 25 2e 7, 2,1 '7 -15 26 5n '9 41 42 43 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 16:58:27 -----@ITY-OF- HERMOSA--BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0018 FOR 03/27/90 DATE 03/22/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO 11 CHK M DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 45 40 4V 5^ S. • *** VENDOR TOTALe*****************************************was*********************** $575.00 R PAUL*HOOKER 03301 001-210-0000-2110 03605 $1,550.00 83227 10545 32960 WORK --GUARANTEE REFUND -- -83227--- 03/15/90 - /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 30:00 -- 03/21/90 -- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,550.00 R INST OF TRANSPORTATION ENGRS 02479 001-400-4202-4305 00474 $30.80 900649 10664 32961 -- PUBLICATIONS/PUBLIC WORK --00649--- -02/28/90- ---------PUB-WKS-ADMIN -/OFFICE-OPER SUPPLIES $30:-10----03/82/90 -- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $30. 80 R ISLAND STYLE CONSTRUCTION 03251 001-400-8146-4201 00002 $2,900.00 10646 32962 F I K --DOWNTOWN - BLOC K --WALL- *** VENDOR TOTAL 03/12/90 - - -------C iP 89-146--- - - -/CONTRACT SERV ICE/PR I VAT - 32, 900. 00 $2, 900:-00 - - 03/22/90 R J C PAPER 03083 001-400-1208-4305 00734 $962.89 84106044 00103 32963 ------------ -- COPIER PAPER/STOCK ------ -06044- ------ 03/05/90 --- GEN APPROP - /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES -$0.00-----03/22/90- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $962.89 R JOHN*KEARIN WARRANT --SERV- CLASS/PD-- *** VENDOR TOTAL 01032 001-400-2101-4312 01194 $350.00 .03/19/90-- — - -POLICE - -- --- -/TRAVEL--EXPENSE - , -POST 3350. 00 10275 32964 $0-00 -- 03/21/90 R CYNTHIA*KELLMAN 03307 001-300-0000-3826 00814 $50.00 91912 10459 32965 ---CANCELED-CL-A99-REFUND-----91912---03/14/90 - - /REC--PROGRAMS/CLASSES - iO-OO----03/21/90 - *** VENDOR TOTAL $50.00 R WILLIAM*KELLY MEALS/LEGAL--UPDATE-CLASS *** VENDOR TOTAL 00362 001-400-2101-4312 01198 $24.00 10272 32966 03/06/90 - ---- POLICE -/TRAVEL-EXPENSE , POST - -$0.-00----03/22/90 324. 00 R KINKO'S 03284 145-400-3406-4201 00017 $457.32 - REPORT COPIES/PLANNING. 03/20/90-------CIRC--ELEMENT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 10810 32967 $0.00- - 03/22/90 • 3 0_ 0 0 • 0 1 1 1 1 • 1 • • 1 • 4 e e A 0 .7 n U n 23 !2 ie v io 11 ,1 51 ee FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ---CITY-OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN K AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************************************+r*** **** R COMMANDER MICHAEL*LAVIN —MEALS/MANAGEMENT SEMINAR - PAGE 0019 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO N CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $457.32 00792 001-400-2101-4312 01197 $24.00 03/06/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LEARNED LUMBER --MISC CMS/FEB 90- LEARNED 0- LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHCS/FEB 90 R LEARNED LUMBER MISE CHCS/FEB 90 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHOS/FEB 90 R LEARNED LUMBER MISO CHOS/FEB 90 00167 001-400-3103-4309 00963 02/28/90 ST MAINTENANCE 00167 001-400-4201-4305 00545 02/28/90 BUILDING 00167 001-400-4204-4309 01601 02/28/90 — -BL-DG MAINT 00167 001-400-4205-4309 00450 02/28/90 EQUIP SERVICE 00167 145-400-8149-4309 00020 02/28/90- — — CIP--90-149 $24.00 $19.78 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $22.31 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $218.37 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $29.27 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $29.59 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $319.32 R STEVE*LEGARE --- -- --WORK GUARANTEE REFUND --- - 83204 10268 32968 30:00-- 03/22/90 00231 32969 -00:00---03/22/90 00231 32969 30.00 - 03/22/90 00231 32969 00:00- -- 03/22/90 00231 32969 $0.00 03/22/90 00231 32969 --110:00---03/22/90 00734 001-210-0000-2110 03611 $950.00 83204 10540 32970 03/15/90 --- /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE -307-00---03/21/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $950.00 R CHARLES H.*LEWIS ---REPLACE--BADGE- 01418 001-400-2101-4187 00330 03/14/90 — — POLICE $45.00 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 345.00 R LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON 02175 001-400-1203-4316 00174 $1,480.00 — -- ANNUAL- CONTRACT- PAYMENT — -- 03/19/90 — — — PERSONNEL- ---- ./TRAINING • *** VENDOR TOTAL R BILL*LITTLE --WORK-GUARANTEE REFUND--- 02581- 03304 001-210-0000-2110 03/15/90 — — *1.480.00 10760 32971 $0:00-03/22/90 10914 32972 --$0700---03/22/90 03610 31.550.00 82581 10541 32973 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00---03/21/90 3 . 15 ., 27 ; 17 10 10 17 11 a] ;y 44 17 an „ '3 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY -OF HERMOSA--BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BRENDA*LOCKARD 03300 001-210-0000-2110 ANIMAL TRAP DEPOSIT -- 89004--- 03/15/90 PAGE 0020 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO * CHK $ AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1,550.00 03603 $50.00 89804 10547 32974 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 1,0:00 - 03/21/90- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LOMITA BLUEPRINT MISC. CHARGES/FEB $50.00 SERVICE, INC. 00077 001-400-3104-4309 00438 $86.4.7 90 - 02/28/90-- -- -- -- TRAFFIC -SAFETY ---/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. MISC. CHARGES/FEB 90 00077 001-400-4202-4305 00476 $60.10 02/28/90 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CITY OF*LOS ANGELES SEPULVEDA TUNNEL SHARE $146.57 03314 001-400-4202-4251 00017 $5,000.00 02/22/90 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** COUNTY OF *LOS ANGELES MAP REVISIONS/MAR 90 $5.000. 00 00287 001-400-4101-4305• 00420 $34.95 1211 03/06/90 - PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES **.* VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CRAIG*LUCIO 03608 $1,575.00 78567 10539 32978 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 78567 .. /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0:00 03/21/90 $34.95 00233 32975 - $0:00 ---03/22/90 00233 32975 $0.00 03/22/90 10678 32976 $0:00 03/22/90 1211 10807 32977 $0.00 03/22/90 00327 001-210-0000-2110 03/15/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MADINA DEVELOPMENT WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 82589 02633 001-210-0000-2110 03/15/90 - $1,575.00 03606 $1,550.00 82589 10544 32979 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00 03/21/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 $1. 550. 00 01859 001-400-1212-4188 01679 $774.56 03/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00041 32980 $0.00 03/22/90 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 -- • MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK --CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 - • MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY -HEALTH INS/APR 90- R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK --CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/APR-90 -CITY--OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 8 DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 01859 03/15/90 01859 03/15/90 01859 03/15/90 01859 03/15/90- 105-400-2601-4188 00919 STREET LIGHTING 110-400-3301-4188 00863 VEH PK0 DIST 110-400-3302-4188 01130 PARKING ENF 145-400-3401-4188 00865 __.. .-..DIAL A -RIDE 01859 145-400-3402-4188 00867 03/15/90 ESEA 01859 03/15/90 01859 03/15/90 01859 03/15/90 01859 03/15/90 01859 03/15/90 145-400-3403-4188 00250 BUS PASS SUBSDY 155-400-2102-4188 00484 CROSSING GUARD 160-400-3102-4188 00861 SEWER/9T-DRAIN-- 705-400-1209-4188 00231 LIABILITY INS 705-400-1217-4188 00230 — WORKERS -COMP ..... $31.11 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.66 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $136.70 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $4.30 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.45 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.46 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.92 /EMPLOYEE BENEFIT9 PAGE 0021 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO $ CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $18.44 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - $1.92 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $3.84 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS-- *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************a***********************war** $975.36 R CITY OF *MANHATTAN BEACH RETIRMNT DINNER/SHELDON - 00183 001-400-1101-4317 00365 $38.00 03/21/90 - -CITY COUNCIL /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $38.00 R MANHATTAN CAR WASH MI9C CHARGES/FEB 90 *** VENDOR TOTAL 01146 001-400-2101-4311 02/28/90 POLICE 00836 $82.50 /AUTO MAINTENANCE R MARGUETTE LEASE SERVICES, INC. -LEASE- PMT/APRIL 90 — ---- -_. 02272 001-400-2101-6900 00497 03/15/90 - POLICE- $82.50 OLICE $82.50 00041 32980 03/22/90 3 $0. 00 14 15 $0:00---03/22/90.-..-... 00041 32980 00041 32980 $0.00 03/22/90 00041 32980 • -110: 00---03/22/90 00041 32980 $0.00 03/22/90 00041 32980 110:00-• 03/22/90 00041 32980 $0.00 03/22/90 00041 32980 ---- 110.00 - 03/22/90 00041 32980 $0.00- 03/22/90 00041 32980 --110700-03/22/90- 09156 10:00--03/22/90. 09156 32981 $O: 00 --- -03/22/90 00236 32982 $0-00--- 03/22/90 $1,233.52 00056 32983 /LEASE PAYMENTS $0:00 03/22/90 o, ;, 71 47 -101 .7 55 6] 1 1 • • • • • • • • r r • • 2 e 6 i n FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R MARGUETTE LEASE SERVICES, INC. LEASE PMT/APRIL 90 CITY -OF HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $ AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02272 001-400-2101-6900 03/15/90 POLICE 00498 $1,072.55 /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** ]4 25 26 2, R MARTIN J. *MAYER - LEGAL SERV/FEB 90 *** VENDOR TOTAL PAGE 0022 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO * CHK $ AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP f2,306.07 03220 001-400-1132-4201 00042 $4,070.00 03/01/90 CTY PROSECUTOR /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R MODESTO JUNIOR COLLEGE TUITION/7 OFFICERS *** VENDOR TOTAL 03010 001-400-2101-4312 03/13/90 POLICE 01195 $4,070.00 *17.50 /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST R CATHY*MORROW ZONE CHANGE NOTICES/90-1 R CATHY*MORROW ZONE CHANGE NOTICES/89-9 *17.50 03204 001-400-4101-4305 00418 $1.450.00 03/14/90 • ---PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 03204 001-400-4101-4305 00419 $300.00 03/14/90 - --PLANNING---- - -./OFFICE-OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 39 41 42 43 44 45 4: 40 ,J 54 SS 56 $1.750.00 R MUNICIPAL TOY COMPANY 01517 001-400-4601-4308 00263 $720.00 EASTER -PROGRAM SUPPLIES --90176----02/20/90------eOMM-RESOURCES---/PROGRAM- MATERIAL9- *** VENDOR TOTAL $720.00 R MYERS STEVENS & COMPANY 00091 001-400-1212-4188 01681 $772.20 CITY HEALTH -I N9/APR 90' -- --- 03/15/90 - — --EMP BENEFITS -- /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - *** VENDOR TOTAL $772.20 00059 32983 $0.00 03/22/90 10360 32984 *0:00 03/22/90 10276 32985 $0.00 03/22/90 10802 32986 $0.00 - 03/22/90 10803 32986 -$0-00--03/22/90 90176 10412 32987 .$7 . 00 03/22/90- -- 00013 32988 $0:-00----09/22/90 R NEW PACIFIC LUMBER CO. 00606 160-400-3102-4309 00460 $80.06 - E584034 00239 32989 -- MISC. CHARGES/FEB 90----84034------ 02/28/90- - ---- —SEWER/ST -DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - - 00:-00----03/22/90 - *** VENDOR TOTAL *80. 06 R OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00564 $5,375.00 LEGAL SERV/FEB 90 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 02/28/90- ---420001--€ TY -ATTORNEY - 09155 32990 --160:00 ----03/22/90 1 7 • 'Y „• 4 �,. 4J 51 • • • • • • • • 2 5 a 2 1. .e 1F I) •'' • • • • • • !e In .o 11 .12 ,.1 el • 411111 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE LEGAL SERV/FEB 90 ---CITY-OF HERMOSA BEACH - DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0023 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00565 $6,730.00 02/28/90 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ORAL HEALTH CITY HEALTH R ORAL HEALTH CITY HEALTH R ORAL HEALTH CITY HEALTH ORAL HEALTH CITY -HEALTH R ORAL HEALTH CITY HEALTH R ORAL HEALTH -CITY HEALTH R ORAL HEALTH CITY HEALTH R ORAL HEALTH CITY HEALTH SERVICES INS/APR 90 SERVICES INS/APR 90 SERVICES INS/APR 90 SERVICES /NS/APR-90-- SERVICES IN9/APR 90 SERVICES INS/APR 90- SERVICES 0 - SERVICES IN9/APR 90 SERVICES INS/APR 90 $12. 105. 00 00235 001-400-1212-4188 01685 $1,289.02 03/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00235 105-400-2601-4188 00923 $67.12 03/15/90 -- STREET -LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00235 110-400-3301-4188 00866 $1.44 03/15/90 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00235 110-400-3302-4188 01133 $313.79 03/15/90 - --PARKING-ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00235 145-400-3401-4188 00869 $7.54 03/15/90 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00235 145-400-3402-4188 00871 $2.45 --- 03/15/90 -ESEA - /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00235 155-400-2102-4188 00487 $5.21 03/15/90 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00235 160-400-3102-4188 00865 $32.96 03/15/90 SEWER/9T DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE _.COMPUTER-HOOKUP/FEB-90-..... $1.719.53 00321 001-400-2101-4304 00522 $162.48 02/28/90 - POLICE - /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PACIFICARE -- - - -CITY--HEALTH INS/APR-90 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 00575 001-400-1212-4188 01674 -03/15/90 - EMP BENEFITS 00575105-400-2601-4188 00916 03/15/90 STREET LIGHTING 3162.48 $17.360.75 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $709.52 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 09155 32990 $0.00 03/22/90 00019 32991 $0.00 03/22/90 00019 32991 $0.00 03/22/90 00019 32991 $0.00 03/22/90 00019 32991 *0.00- 03/22/90 00019 32991 $0.00 03/22/90 00019 32991 $0.00--- - 03/22/90 00019 32991 $0.00 03/22/90 00019 32991 -*0:-00-• 03/22/90 00036 32992 $0:00 03/22/90 00016 32993 $0.00--- 03/22/90 00016 32993 $0.00 03/22/90 e e 11 14 15 17 10 2. :) z; 2e 2, v 4, FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:59:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 42 43 44 4, PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R PACIFICARE - CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 • - R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/APR-40.- PACIFICARE NS/APR-90 -- PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R PACIFICARE HEALTH-INS/APR-90 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 -CITY-OF HERMOSA-BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0024 FOR 03/27/90 DATE 03/22/90 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 8 AMOUNT INV/REF PO K CHK 8 DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00575 110-400-3301-4188 00861 03/15/90 VEH PKG DIST 00575 110-400-3302-4188 01126 03/15/90 PARKING ENF 00575 145-400-3401-4188 00861 03/15/90 DIAL A RIDE 00575 145-400-3402-4188 00863 03/15/90 E9EA -- - 00575 145-400-3403-4188 00248 03/15/90 BUS PASS 9UBSDV 00575 155-400-2102-4188 00483 03/15/90 - —CROSSING GUARD - 00575 160-400-3102-4188 00858 03/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN R PACIFICARE 00575 CITY HEALTH INS/APR-90 -- - -03/15/90 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 *** VENDOR TOTAL 705-400-1209-4188 00227 --LIABILITY IN9 00575 705-400-1217-4188 00226 03/15/90 WORKERS COMP $12.04 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2,828.91 /EMPLOYEE BENEFIT9 $82.50 /EMPLOYEE BENEFIT9 $27.46 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $7.22 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $48.06 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $325.06 /EMPLOYEE BENEFIT9 $87.50 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $87.50 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R PACTEL CELLULAR - LA MOBILE PHONE CHGS/FEB 90 12741 03209 001-400-2101-4304 02/28/90 POLICE $21,576.52 00519 $122.24 /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************+**+******************************* 4M1 4! 411 .;u R LINDA*PAINS SPRING CLASS REFUND 03309 001-300-0000-3826 91959 - - 03/12/90 - $122.24 00820 $50.00 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PAK WEST MI9C CHARGES/MAR 90 $50.00 00519 001-400-4204-4309 01603 *205.24 87468- 03/12/90 - BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00016 32993 $0.00 03/22/90 00016 32993 *O.00 03/22/90 00016 32993 $0.00 03/22/90 00016 32993 - $0:00......._03/22/90 -- 00016 32993 $0.00 03/22/90 00016 32993 10;00. 03/22/90 00016 32993 $0.00 03/22/90 00016 32993 *0.00-- 03/22/90 00016 32993 $0:00 03/22/90 1112741 00276 32994 - 03/22/90 91959 10453 32995 110.00 03/22/90 687468 00340 32996 $0.00 03/22/90 544, • • .• • • • • • • 5 e 12 14 1, 17 ie •` • • • • • • • • • • • • • • n 'o 10 14 11 47 .e 40 e• 5' ,4 ,M1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:59:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY -OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0025 FOR 03/27/90 DATE 03/22/90 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO Si CHK N DATE INVC PROJ it ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $205.24 R MS*PAVLAKOVICH 02275 001-300-0000-3826 00816 $50.00 93460 10456 32997 SPRING CLASS REFUND 93460 03/13/90 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES $0.00 03/21/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00 R PERFORMING TREE, INC. 00600 001-400-4601-4201 00526 $1,770.00 10452 32998 --CHILDREN'S THEATRE SERV. *** VENDOR TOTAL 03/08/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R PHOENIX GROUP $1,770.00 $0.-00-- 03/21/90 02530 110-300-0000-3302 32356 $2,257.92 4702-00 00077 32999 --OUT-OF-STATE C ITES/FEB9O--02-00 -- - -- 03/16/90- *** 3/16/90- *** VENDOR TOTAL /COURT-FINES/PARKING - -50:-00--- 03/22/90 $2,257.92 R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. 00585 001-400-1212-4188 01676 $61.25 CITY SHARE AUTO-HOME/APR 03/15/90 - EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. 00585 105-400-2601-4188 00918 $2.50 CITY SHARE AUTO-HOME/APR 03/15/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00038 33000 $0:00 -- 03/22/90 00038 33000 $0.00 03/22/90 R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. 00585 110-400-3301-4188 00862 $0.50 00038 33000 CITY SHARE AUTO-HOME/APR- ---- — 03/15/90 — -- - VEH-PKG-DIST/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - $0.-00- --03/22/90 R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. 00585 110-400-3302-4188 01128 $4.25 CITY SHARE AUTO-HOME/APR 03/15/90 -- PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00038 33000 $0.00 - 03/22/90 R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. 00585 160-400-3102-4188 00860 $1.00 00038 33000 -CITY SHARE AUTO-HOME/APR -- — - 03/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00---03/22/90 R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. 00385 705-400-1209-4188 00229 - $1.25 00038 33000 CITY SHARE AUTO-HOME/APR 03/15/90 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. 00585 705-400-1217-4188 00228 $1.25 CI-TY--SHARE-AUTO-HOME/APR 03/15/90 — WORKERS COMP -- --/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $72.00 R JOHN*PROUTT $0.00 03/22/90 00038 33000 $0:00- 03/22/90 03302 001-210-0000-2110 03607 $350.00 83218 10543 33001 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND. - 83218-- --- 03/15/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0:00---03/21/90 R :7 1• FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ---CITY-OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0026 FOR 03/27/90 DATE 03/22/90 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ***Awa0*********************************a*w************************* $350.00 R FRED*PRYOR SEMINARS, INC. 00298 001-400-4201-4316 00198 $99.00 610360 10326 33002 SEMINAR REO/C. LOCKHART 10360 03/13/90 BUILDING /TRAINING 199.00 03/22/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $99.00 R PURKISS-ROSE ASSOCIATES 02982 001-400-4601-4201 00529 $3,844.66 5989 10415 33003 CONTRACT PMT/DEC 89 -- 5989 01/22/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/22/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3.844.66 R RADIO SHACK 01429 001-400-1205-4305 00077 $15.95 00343 33004 - MISC CHARGES/MARCH-90 03/15/90 CABLE TV /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00:00 03/22/90 R RADIO SHACK 01429 001-400-2101-4305 01205 $10.62 MISC CHARGES/MARCH 90 03/15/90 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $26.57 00343 33004 $0.00 03/22/90 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO 00173 001-400-2101-4306 00777 $203.27 00244 33005 MISC. CHARGES/FEB 90 02/28/90 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 03/22/90 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO 00173 001-400-4101-4305 00421 $34.82 00244 33005 MISC. CHARGES/FEB 90 -- - 02/28/90 -- PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 03/22/90 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO 00173 001-400-4201-4305 00546 $70.52 00244 33005 MISC. CHARGES/FEB 90 02/28/90 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 03/22/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $308.61 R DEIRDRE D.*RAINER 03308 001-300-0000-3826 00821 $35.00 SPRING CLASS REFUND 93529 03/12/90 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $35.00 93529 10458 33006 $0.00 03/22/90 R CITY OF*REDONDO BEACH 03282 140-400-4701-4201 00005 $1.654.85 10804 33007 CDBG HOUSING ADMIN/JAN90 02/09/90 • -HOUSING REHAB /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/22/90 • • • I I 'I • • • • • 5 S 0... S S S S 0 S S • n 5. 9. FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY -OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0027 FOR 03/27/90 DATE 03/22/90 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************************area****** $1,654.85 R REGENTS - U.C. 02582 001-400-2101-5403 00016 $12,000.00 973951 10717 33008 2 MOTORCYCLES/POLICE 73951 01/11/90 POLICE /VEHICLES $12,000.00 03/22/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $12,000.00 R LISA*REYNOLDS 03298 001-210-0000-2110 03601 $50.00 93639 10550 33009 - --ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 93639 03/15/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 03/21/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL $50.00 R OFCR DAVID*RICKEY 00949 001-400-2101-4312 01196 $8.00 10252 33010 MEALS/MOTORCYCLE COURSE 03/15/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00- -03/22/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $8. 00 R RMRS SYSTEMS 00300 001-400-1208-4305 00732 $2,000.00 08023 33011 - POSTAGE METER RESET 03/15/90 - -GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,000.00 R VICKY*RYAN 03296 110-300-0000-3302 32358 $18.00 CITE PAYMENT REFUND 70155 03/12/90 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $18.00 - $0.00-- 03/21/90 870155 00110 33012 $0:00-- -- 03/22/90 R SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 00021 001-400-3104-4309 00436 $624.49 36890 10653 33013 STREET SIGNS - 36890-- 03/08/90 --- TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $624.49 03/22/90 R SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 00021 001-400-4204-4321 00499 $104.40 36786 10638 33013 "EMPLOYEE ONLY" SIGNS 36786 03/02/90 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT $104.48 03/22/90 R SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 00021 001-400-6101-5499 00008 $289.29 36828 10639 33013 -INTERNATIONAL SIGNS/PIER-36828 - 03/06/90 --PARKS- /NON-CAPITALIZED ASSETS *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************.****************************** $1,018.18 R JIMMIE LEE*SHAW ----MILES/CORRECTIONS CLASS 00960 001-400-2101-4313 00254 ' $223.60 03/06/90 -- POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE: STC $289:29 03/22/90 10267 33014 $0.00 03/22/90 1 1 1 1 n 12 11 24 28 Ph 115 38 17 DI 30 .o 1 42 1 ir 1 1 1 1 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY --OF HERMOSA--BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LEN*SILVEY. INC. TUITION/J. CARUSO *** VENDOR TOTAL PAGE 0028 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO * CHK !i AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $223.60 01071 001-400-2101-4313 00255 $399.54 03/06/90 POLICE R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. MISC:—CHARGES/FEB 90 /TRAVEL EXPENSE. STC $399.54 01399 001-400-4204-4309 01602 $242.02 02/28/90 - BLDG MAINT - /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JOAN*SLEMMONS CANCELED -CLASS REFUND- *** VENDOR TOTAL $242.02 03285 001-300-0000-3826 00822 $50.00 03/06/90 /REC-PROGRAMS/CLASSES R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 MISC: CHARGES/MAR 90 - 44721--------03/15/90 R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 44726 *50.00 001-400-2101-4306 00774 $46.27 POLICE -/PRISONER MAINTENANCE 00114 001-400-4601-4308 00264 $62.45 03/15/90 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. BUS PASS SALES/FEB 90 50431 $108.72 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00067 $1,409.00 03/07/90 - BUS PASS SUBSDV /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SO. CAL SHARPSHOOTER. INC. RANGE FEES/MAY—DEC 89 65-68 02250 001-400-2101-4201 02/27/90 POLICE $1,409.00 10266 33015 $0:00 03/22/90 00246 33016 $0: 00 -03/22/90 10443 33017 • *0-00-03/22/90 244721 00347 33018 $0.00---03/22/90 • 244726 00347 33018 $0.00 03/22/90 50431 09986 33019 $0.00 -03/22/90 00535 $3.293.71 3465-68 10746 33020 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/22/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOURISSEAU SUPPORT SERVICES - -BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION 4461--- $3.293. 71 02075 001-400-2101-4201 00534 $420.00 - 1461 10758 33021 01/13/90 — POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 - 03/22/90 •i 7 1111 e ,.• P 1 1 • • • • • S 0 S a • • S S s FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 12 14 15 16 32 15 30 11 44 .5 51 55 R SOURISSEAU SUPPORT SERVICES BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION 13-16 R SOURISSEAU SUPPORT SERVICES RANGE--FEES/MAY-DEC 89 65-68 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY -OF HERMOSA -BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02075 001-400-2101-4201 00536 03/06/90 POLICE 02075 001-400-2201-4201 00124 02/27/90 FIRE PAGE 0029 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO Si CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $90.00 1413-16 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 10753 33021 $0.00 03/22/90 $149.55 3465-68 10746 33021 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT - -- - $0.-00--- 03/22/90--- $659. 55 R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER 00113 001-400-2201-4309 00839 $52.31 - MISC:-CHARGES/MAR 90 5933------- 03/15/90 FIRE --- /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *w* VENDOR TOTAL *****www****************************www*www************************* R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL PRISONER SERV/FEB 90 *** VENDOR TOTAL 00107 001-400-2101-4201 03/14/90 POLICE 00533 $52.31 $137.40 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITE-SURCHARGE/FEB 90 -- - *** VENDOR TOTAL 00118 110-300-0000-3302 02/28/90 $137. 40 32359 $15.261.00 /COURT-FINES/PARKING R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITATION -COURT -BAIL - *** VENDOR TOTAL $15.261.00 00400 110-300-0000-3302 32355 $582.00 03/19/90 - _' /COURT FINES/PARKING R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC-CHARGES/FEB 90--- R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHARGES/FEB 90 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC- CHARGES/FEB 90 00018 001-400-2201-4309 - 02/28/90 FIRE 00838 * $582.00 $41.63 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00018 001-400-3103-4309 00960 $77.07 02/28/90 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00018 001-400-3104-4309 00432 $77.08 02/28/90 ------TRAFFIC SAFETY -/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. - ELEC- B ILLNOS/FEB 90 -- -- - $195.78 5933 00348 33022 -*0700---03/22/90 10759 33023 $0.00 - ---03/22/90 00111 33024 . $0-00--09/22/90 09992 33025 ---160:-00-•-03/22/90 00251 33026 *0:00 --03/22/90 00251 33026 $0.00 03/22/90 00251 33026 --$0700----03/22/90 00159 001-400-3101-4303 00085 $45.35 00252 33027 02/28/90 - - --MEDIANS /UTILITIES $0.00 -03/22/90 2 3 4 e ft 12 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 15 1n 10 24 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLNGS/FEB 90 — CITY -OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00159 02/28/90 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 ------ELEC-BILLNGS/FEB 90 - 02/28/90 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. --ELEC BILLNGS/FEB 90 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC-BILLNGS/FEB-90 — R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLNGS/FEB 90 001-400-3104-4303 00044 TRAFFIC SAFETY 001-400-4204-4303 00372 BLDG MAINT 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00298 02/28/90 PARKS 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00233 02/28/90 _._ ..._.-_-_-__.. .STREET LIGHTING 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00131 02/28/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN $563.26 /UTILITIES $6,883.47 /UTILITIES $884.51 /UTILITIES $219.05 /UTILITIES -- $52. 53 /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 2': • .15 J6 10 09 .11 42 44 45 51 55 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. GAS BILLINGS/FEB 90 PACE 0030 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO N CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $8,648.17 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00371 $1.471.86 02/28/90 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO SWEEPING SERV/FEB 90 2487 R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO SWEEPING SERV/FEB 90 --- --2487- $1,471.86 487- $1.471.86 00115 001-400-3103-4201 00265 $2,548.00 02/28/90 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00115 110-400-3301-4201 00253 $2,941.00 -02/28/90 — -VEH PKG-DIST----- -/CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT--- *** VENDOR TOTAL-******************************************************************** *5,489.00 00252 33027 $0.00 03/22/90 00252 33027 $0.00-- 03/22/90 00252 ' 33027 $0.00- 03/22/90 00252 33027 *0:00-03/22/90- 00252 0:00--03/22/90- 00252 33027 $0:00 03/22/90 00253 33028 $0:00 03/22/90 2487 00029 33029 $0.00 03/22/90 2487 00029 33029 -----*0 -00----03/22/90 R STATE OF CALIFORNIA 00364 001-400-2101-4251 00299 $153.75, 878436 00023 33030 -----------FINGERPR-INT APPS/JAN-90- 78436 02/23/90 -POLICE -- - /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT -- - --- ---. --*O:-00 --03/22/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SUPREME DIAMOND 02164 - -----CONCRETE/BLACKTOP BLADES --15248------- 03/13/90 R SUPREME DIAMOND CONCRETE/BLACKTOP BLADES 15248 • 001-400-3103-4309 00962 - ST MAINTENANCE $153.75 $274.23 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 02164 001-400-3104-4309 00437 $274.23 03/13/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 15248 10689 33031 $0.00 03/22/90 15248 10689 33031 $0.00 03/22/90 • 41 4 { 20 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 3 e 2 11 :I 2,1 )n in 711 • s� • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R SUPREME DIAMOND CONCRETE/BLACKTOP BLADES 15248 ---CITY-0F HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0031 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO $ CHK k AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 02164 105-400-2601-4309 00582 $274.23 15248 10689 33031 03/13/90 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/22/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************a**********r****ars*****s*****a****** R JANET*TOOTELL ----- SPRING CLASS REFUND 03288 001-300-0000-3826 93435 03/06/90 $822.69 00825 $50.00 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL*a*a*****s*s**rs******a**s*******s**************r******************* R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 350. 00 00240 001-400-1212-4188 01680 $179.19 03/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 - — 03/15/90- R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL --CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL — CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 105-400-2601-4188 00920 31. 52 - -STREET-LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 145-400-3401-4188 00866 $0.94 03/15/90 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 145-400-3402-4188 00868 $0.38 -03/15/90 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS --- 00240 160-400-3102-4188 00862 $3.04 03/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 705-400-1209-4188 00232 $3.17 ------03/15/90- -- -- ----LIABILITY INS • /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 705-400-1217-4188 00231 $3.17 03/15/90 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************a******************** R CYNTHIA*TRAVAGLIO SPRING CLASS REFUND 03286 001-300-0000-3826 88945 03/06/90 $191.41 00823 $32.00 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $32.00 93435 10445 33032 $0.00 03/22/90 4 1 4 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-2201-4309 00841 $111.83 MISC CHARGES/FEB 90 02/28/90 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00029 33033 $0.00 03/22/90 00029 33033 $0:00-03/22/90 00029 33033 $0.00 03/22/90 00029 33033 - $0.00---03/22/90 00029 33033 $0.00 03/22/90 00029 33033 $0:00 --- 03/22/90 00029 33033 $0:00 03/22/90 88945 10447 33034 $0.00 03/22/90 00258 33035 $0.00 03/22/90 1 1 4 ,.4 -I 1 • 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 e 0 „ 12 :4 25 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:58:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 35 l5 3, 10 I0 IC 11 42 40 • R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHARGES/FEB 90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE --------------MISC CHARGES/FEB 90 - R TRIANGLE HARDWARE ---------• MISC CHARGES/FEB 90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHARGES/FEB 90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHARGES/FEB 90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC--CHARGES/FEB 90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHARGES/FEB 90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC CHARGES/FEB 90 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00123 001-400-2201-4311 00321 02/28/90 FIRE 00123 001-400-3103-4309 00961 02/28/90 ST MAINTENANCE 00123 001-400-3104-4309 00434 02/28/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00123 001-400-4204-4309 01599 02/28/90 - BIDS-MAINT- $5. 67 /AUTO MAINTENANCE PAGE 0032 DATE -03/22/90 INV/REF PO SI CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $6.42 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $101.43 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00258 33035 $0.00 03/22/90 00258 33035 $0.00-- 03/22/90 00258 33035 $0.00 03/22/90 $278.38 00258 33035 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - ------- -----50:-00------03/22/90 00123 105-400-2601-4309 00581 $84.90 02/28/90 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00123 110-400-3302-4309 00660 02/28/90 - ._-----PARKING ENF 00123 145-400-8149-4309 00019 02/28/90 • CIP 90-149 00123 160-400-3102-4309 00459 02/28/90 ------SEWER/ST DRAIN - $26. 82 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $16.69 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $17.67 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $649.81 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. -CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90--- ---- R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. • CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/APR-90 - R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH 1NS/APR 90 02355 001-400-1212-4188 01682 $785.72 03/15/90 - EMP BENEFITS ----/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02355 105-400-2601-4188 00921 $24.40 03/15/90 - STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02355 110-400-3301-4188 00864 $0.80 -03/15/90 - -VEH PKG-DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02355 110-400-3302-4188 01131 $136.00 03/15/90 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02355 145-400-3401-4188 00867 $4.48 03/15/90- -DIAL-A-RIDE - ----/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02355 145-400-3402-4188 03/15/90 --- ESEA 00869 $1. 52 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00258 33035 $0.00 03/22/90 00258 33035 $0.00 -03/22/90 00258 33035 $0.00- 03/22/90 00258 33035 --$0:00- 03/22/90 00028 33036 ----- ----- - S0: 00-----03/22/90 00028 33036 $0.00 03/22/90 00028 33036 - $0.00 - -03/22/90 00028 33036 $0.00 03/22/90 00028 33036 $0.00 - -03/22/90 00028 33036 $0.00 03/22/90 • •I • • • _ FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 16:58:27 • e • " *I I 3 • i. • " n •.. •:1 • • • )1 • •, • ,n • 'I • „ • ., 4, .n 40 95 • ,n • PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY—OF-HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/27/90 VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ It ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. —CITY -HEALTH -INS/APR-90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 - R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 02355 145-400-3403-4188 00251 $0.48 03/15/90 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PAGE 0033 DATE 03/22/90 INV/REF PO * CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 02355 155-400-2102-4188 00485 $2.00 03/15/90 — -- - CROSSING -GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -- 02355 160-400-3102-4188 00863 $20.00 03/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02355 705-400-1209-4188 00233 03/15/90 $1.20 LIABILITY .iNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02355 705-400-1217-4188 00232 03/15/90 $1.20 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R UNITED AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. CITY HEALTH INS/APR 90 5977. 80 02697 001-400-1212-4188 01683 $80.00 03/15/90 --EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SUSAN*UPDIKE SPRING CLASS REFUND 93477 03287 001-300-0000-3826 03/06/90 $80.00 00824 $35.00 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R VALLEY LODGE HOTEL/J. CARUSO 02795 001-400-2101-4313 03/06/90 POLICE $35.00 00253 $578.88 /TRAVEL EXPENSE. STC *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R VERNON PAVING COMPANY 5578. 88 00019 160-400-3102-4309 00458 $44.13 MISC CHARGES/FEB 90 10557 02/28/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R J. S. *WARD & CO. AS AGENT FOR REIMB LIABILITY/FEB 90 $44.13 02466 705-400-1209-4201 00124 $23.927.55 02/28/90 - — LIABILITY IN9 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00028 33036 $0.00 03/22/90 00028 33036 $0:00— 03/22/90 - 00028 33036 $0.00 03/22/90 00028 33036 $0:00-- 03/22/90- 00028 33036 $0.00-- 03/22/90 00065 33037 --$0:-00— 03/22/90 93477 10444 33038 $0.00 03/22/90 10265 33039 $0:00 03/22/90 10557 00260 33040 $0.00 03/22/90 10912 33041 $0.00 03/22/90 • • • • • • • • 4/ lu 1. • • • r. I' • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • 0 • , 3 Fz TIME 16:58:27 ---- -.------ PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ,. " .. 35 3,3 ~ .. .. ., ^' . an nn n J.o.*wwno & co. AS AGENT FOR esIme LIABILITY/FEB 90 CITY OF *snMao*'ocwu* -- '-------------'-- DEMAND LIST LIsr p*Gs 0034 FOR 03/27/90 DATE 03/22/90 VND w ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF Po Si CHK * DATE INVC PROJ w ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 02*66 705-400-1209-4324 00130 w179.00 02/28/90 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL **^***************************************************************** n CINDY*WEITZ CANCELED -CLASS REFUND - 91929 . 03/08/90 03305 001-300-0000-3826 00815 $50.00 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES v** VENDOR TOTAL ***°°***°**°**°***°*°*****°°**°°*°***°**°****************°°********* n WESTERN GRAPHICS PLASTIC LAMINATING POUCH 7586 02873 11 00667 03/01/90 PARKING ENF *on.o4 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *°° VENDOR TOTAL °°°°°**°v°°*°°°°°*°**°°*°*°°°°°°°°°°°°**^°°°°*°**^°°,°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° n SALLY A. *WHITE SEC SERVICES/3-6-90 00140 001-400-4102-4201 00249 $ee9.00 03/14/90 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT °°* VENDOR TOTAL °*°°°v°*=****°°*****°°*°*°°**°°***°=************* ** *****=*** ***** R XEROX CORPORATION XEROX METER USE/FEB 90 21373 n XEROX CORPORATION --LEASE PMT/MARCH 90- 57215 n XEROX CORPORATION • LEASE PMT/MARCH 90 00135 001-400-1208-4201 00632 02/28/90 GEN APPROP 10912 33041 91929 10451 33042 03/21/90 7586 09973 33043 $31:95 03/22/90 *31.96 024021373 /CONTRACT SsevIns/peIvAr 00135 001 -*00-1208-6900 00221 *9*5.93 03/02/90 OEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00222 *one.ro 57675, -- 03/02/90 - GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS n XEROX CORPORATION -57676 n XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT/MARCH 90 n XEROX CORPORATION -----LEASE-PAYMENT/MARCH-90 n XEROX CORPORATION LEASE PMT/MARCH 90 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00223 *321.83 00135 001-400-2201-6900 57672 03/02/90 FIRE/LEASE PAYMENTS 00107 *47.74 00135 001-400-2401-6900 00059 *56.15 ---57679 03/02/90 ANIMAL CONTROL- -ILEASE PAYMENTS 00135 001-400-4601-6900 00060 *189.65 57674.• 03/02/90 • - - COMM RESOURCES /LEASE PAYMENTS l0000 330*4 00264 33045 524857215 00048 33045 524857675 00050 33045 524857676 000*9 33045 524e57672 00053 330*5 524857673 00051 33045 524857674 00052 33045 • , " �WN .0•�. . � | • .• "• '] . ]•| .NN ~ • • M CITY -OF HERMOSA BEACH- — _ -_ • = FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0035 2 TIME 16:58:27 FOR 03/27/90 DATE 03/22/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VND K ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK * e •DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ' • • • • 4 4 5 11 12 13 1. 15 16 17 IS 10 27 24 25 26 27 1e 020 36 )7 A 30 19 47 4) a 45 4e 4Y 0 52 5 54 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 110-400-3302-6900 00144 $114.40 524857673 00051 33045 LEASE PAYMENT/MARCH 90 57673 03/02/90 PARKING ENF /LEASE PAYMENTS 110.00 03/22/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** *** TOTAL WARRANTS****************************************************************** 56 -es 7 • $1,946.38 $259.004.17 $882,611.43 I H,RLL1Y CERIIFY THAT THE DEMANDS JWt CLAIMS COVERED BY THE WARRANTS- LISTED ONP (•�VCLUSWE OF THE WARRANT REGISTER (:::t--__..^ 7i 94_ .RE ACCURATE AND FUNDEi ARFI THEREOF: BY FINANCE ADMINISTRA I UR DATE .../90:7 e 1 10 110 41 22 3)153 36 )7 714 1 :;11 17 5] 54 55 56 57 gni 6— f.` 62 65 6I 65 66 67 March 20, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of March 27, 1990 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS, FEBRUARY 1990 Attached are the budget reports for February, 1990, the eighth month of this fiscal year, which reflect Midyear budget revisions approved February 13, 1990. For 66% of the fiscal year, General Fund revenues received are 69% of budget. Sales tax receipts are ahead due to reporting of the Nissan auto dealership. Those revenues may be deducted depending on the Board of Equalization's ruling. Parking Fund revenues are 60% received. Expenditures in the General Fund are below budget at 63% expended and Parking Fund expenditures are 61% expended. Concur: even B. Norcraft Viki Copeland City Manager Attachments Finance Director ldw ° 6 -7- 6 " ' FzwAmos-rA484 TIME 13:07:53 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION ---__-.'_ ''- 001 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT- ouoo--- o1oo TAXES ----'--��---�� - - `^-'-' 0 -`-�-'��=,u-p--------------'-----n-' o'----�'m��-^»ou~'^^=°' YEAR UNSECURED 738:•00•--.---98/-41•7787-7-7-17-4927225.-80----1-,-267J om�-` *-- � 03103 /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS /SUPPLEMENTAL- ROLL -98813 60.000'00 50'000 00 53. a� 32-�-,218, 437. 45 168, 437. 45�- *oa 8' ono� oo �O. 00 %�1a7'852. 33 �n'�pr�� 91. 2 - 226770 -�---�`'--: /TRANSFER TAX 48, 587.-35 11'4za-6n12p'oo7.00 O. 00 71'617.e5 or 469. 75 X OBJECT SUBTOTAL • /BUSINESS LICENSE``*�ETV FRANCHISE OCCUPANCY '�°mcn/u�/GAS cHISE /ELE:rnI«FRANCHISE /SALES TAX 1.7e0.309oo 101, 67B. 00 410, 00 154, omx�o.000 00--------6,-687.-27------87-1-869:a«------.'�7ozV0oa.�«� oo xo4^aoo oo 314-763:-41- O. 1��'*1 2. oom O. 00 -1'/'o�.� 86.i*21``p-------14^. 9na'nx---'-8m 2----�_ --- - -o�'7�.� o � zo:« ro11e *oo7aa�^,____n.__1a«.1o7.ea3z'uu4.a7 O. 590: 00 �|�����O���x'��� |ae,7 nv 979 a '� 3114��oz10 o.009.5m*ou_o1'oxn oaooe*o'aao�10'--'-'.'~ 3200 LICENSES AND PERMITS ~~~� -/onn LICENSES = 872: 00. 16'o�.r5'__-_���__�_2__� �^~ 3204 /BUILDING PERMITS 15. 00 300. 00 - 1-m-�_,-'-�-~ 71. ~^~---- �zc�Lsu� ''v*�'u 105, 619. 15 64.38085 ----- -------����crn�o PERMITS 276. 00 =`'9"�5«�'--~^~~ '=""//u 30, 000. oo e'»6o:no'----ma7-----^a�'7rp oo �'�uz�»o eo�� 3207 /OCCUPANCY PERMITS 'o.00 557 00 �'o�8. o33 192. 00 63.4 .;:,-.------------ -- -- ------/GARAGE SALES 65. 00 r 3210 /u/mno PERMITS 100. 00 '��:3, 3211 oo ao 00695. 28 o.om----92.o /BANNER PERMITS 1, 360. 00aa* 72 o oo �»»�oo------'/*wzm*LvFowL PERMITS ��o�o»-50.oo48.83213 400; 00 voo on_ - --3214 /AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMITO. o.497'oo 3. 00 99.9 /ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE 3'500.00 400. 00 Gil -267'o6o.uo----2e,vo9:9o_-_1ea/6na 97 ' ["�_30. 330. 00 60. 00 o«a |,�---'---3301 ---/vsHIcLs--2�-__~'.~ .3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3303AT I /COURT FINES/POLICE ospr-11o.000 nn-'----e/ro9au----_-7a.roco8------or.o6o;9a-`'---aa 1 �o.onm oo4�~OBJECT SUBTOTAL' 150,000.00 r,avn.or `eo 7 :----'------',12, 234. 105, 0+0. 51 4*'959.*9 70. 0 o'52*'o«oa'omp«o 36 r,, 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME v[22 3402 /RENTS CONCESSIONS _____''-~~.~" 136, 794. 93 52, 310. o7' 7e� o ^ '.1o5.00 73.873.11 189 :m -xeo. 16 oror3403 /PIER REVENUE xo'000.00 576. 20 7, 933. on 2, 566. 50 75.5 ix'aa� o4 ��3404 /comn CTR LEASES 80,o«o.oo 7'521.a3 54, 48* ao-__u*oo vcomm «rneswrALm_____e55'--'--^~~ q'*po'7o--7o.or3*11 /OTHER ,~'^^'^=� �*000.00~~'8^".^/ 1o'1e1�o3 6x�eTHEATRE 1,�on.�7 (-15,,60^000 00 o/.ona.uo 8, 148. 00 �'�o�.uo `^' 3406 /COMM CTR oxoeoxur -czrv oF'*snmoSm BEACH- --nsvswos SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 000�pAGs '� • 670% OF YEAR -COMPLETE"-- 4 YEAR TO DATE BALANCE % � FINANCE-FA484 3 TIME 13: 07: 53 4 r. r r CITY OF -HERMOSA'-BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 001 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 '3 14 .42 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3412 - --- ..•/TENNIS -COURTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL ------- 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTALSTATE 3504 /IN LIEU OFF HIGHWAY 393.00 0.00 3505 /IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE 708, 891. 00 76, 964. 75 3507 /HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE - 3, 500. 00-- - 0:00 3508 /MANDATED COSTS 0. 00 6, 755. 00 6, 755. 00- 0. 0 3509 /HOMEOWNER PROP TX RELIE 65,000.00 O. 00 32, 894. 78 32, 105. 22 50. 6 3510 /POST -_.._..-_ 48, 000. 00 -`----• 736.-12 - 28, 930: 45 '----19; 069:" 55 60. 2 3511 /STC -SVC OFF TRAINING 8, 500. 00 O. 00 3, 000. 00 5, 500. 00 35. 2 3514 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /CIGARETTE TAX 47, 323. 00 3, 560. 68 29, 327. 89 17, 995. 11 61. 9 ---- --881, 607.`00------81, 261: 55-- 576; 931.- 07 - ----3047675. 93 65:4 PAGE 0002 DATE 03/14/90-: 667 -07. -OF' YEAR -COMPLETE UNREALIZED • EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 10, 000. 00 790. 50 t, 414: 60 432, 055. 00 93, 446. 13 316, 060. 54 .:. 2, 585:'40----74:-1- 115, 994. 46 73. 1 333. 23 59. 77 B4. 7 474, 462. 26 234, 428. 74 66. 9 . 1, 227:46' ---2,, 272:54 35. 0 0. 00 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES ,:. 3801 --...• /RESIDENTIAL -INSPECTION -------11, 000. 00--- ---- 440. 00 6, 320:00---- 47680-00- 57-4- r : 3802 /SIGN REVIEW 900. 00 75. 00 700. 00 200. 00 77. 7 3803 /ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 4, 230. 00 460. 00 3, 080. 00 1, 150. 00 72. 8 �, 3806 -- /BOARD OF APPEALS .... ___..._.-._..-...-.__..... 300. 00 ..._...... O. 00 - - 225. 00 ...._. --- 3808 . 75. 00 ------75. O--- /ZONE •VARIANCE REVIEW 1, 280. 00 550. 00 i, 190. 00 90. 00 92. 9 ;, 3809 /TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW 5, 400. 00 1, 125. 00 4, 500. 00 900. 00 83. 3 3810 - ---/FINAL MAP REVIEW 3, 050. 00 - --- 125. 00 2, 175. 00 (^ 3811 /ZONE CHANGE REVIEW "-'875.'00•-- --- 71:3----- 1, 800. 00 O. 00 1, 090. 00 710. 00 60. 5 ;; 3812 /CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 23, 856. 00 5, 610. 00 20, 330. 00 3813 5, 758. 00 , 60. 2 ,: -- /PLAN CHECK FEES -- 415, 000: 00 8, 387: 95 69, 241: 65 -- 45, 758. 35 60. 2 (^,, 3814 3815 /PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL 2, 398. 00 O. 00 583. 00 1, 815. 00 24. 3 ,.,-L 3817 /PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES . • 10,000. 00 789. 10 5, 766. 29 4, 233. 71 57. 6 ., - -- ------ /SPECIAL CURB - MARKING-- ---- - 300. 00 0. 00 ('^ „ 3818 /POLICE SERVICES • 18, 000. 00 1, 063. 50 11, 292. 25 107. 70 - 62. 7 3819 /JAIL SERVICES 3, 553. 50 62. 17 1 O, 200. 00 1, 036. 50 6, 646. 50 :� --...- - 3820 3, 553. 50 65. 1 -._._....O. 00 186. 50 `.421 /FINGERPRINT SERVICE 3, 000. 00 165. 00 1, 615. 00 3823 /SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY 45, 000. 00 1, 385. 00 53. B "' 632. 50 37, 732. 30 7, 267. 70 83. 8 --- -- 3824 ---/VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES--.---.- -_- 3, 000. 00 1. 009: 50 O , 3825 3826 /PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING 100.00 4 367. 50 - 20.7 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES O. 00 54. 00 96. 00 30 9 30, 650. 00 5, 454. 00 12, 254. 00 18, 396. 00 39. 9 G -.... .-.... 3827 - . /LIQRARY GROUNDS MAINT-..._.------._.... 4, 517. 00 --------- _ 3831 /STREET 3834 CUTO. 00 INSPECTION 15, 000. 00 3, 600. 00 10, 075. 00 4, 925. 00 67. 1 /ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 17, 616. 00 720. 00 9, 167. 50 8, 448. 50 . 3836 - /FUMIGATION INSPECT FEE - --- - - 7, 500. 00 -- 7, 500. 00 ---- 52. 0 3837 253: 80 4, 331. 60 ------ 3, 168. 40 - 57. 7 3838 7 /RETURNED CHECK CHARGE 800.00 110.00 551.80 248. 20 68.9 /SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIO 1, 000. 00 57. 80 594.95 405. 05 59. 4 Q,. -,111 FINANCE-FA484 TIME 13:07:53 -„... k FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 001 GENERAL FUND ----- • • 1 t: v, -7 ----DEPARTMENT 0000 r•-• , , .. • • •.-_-__ • -• 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 12 3839 -/PHOTOCOPY-CHARGES 1,000.00 70720 726: -25 - /AMBULANCE TRANSPORT 8,500.00 932.86:t:.-. 4,116.86 /POLICE TOWING 26,500.00 -/GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 900:00 0.00 450;00 /PKG PLAN APPLICATION 960.00 /TENANT REFUSE BILLING 200.00 , /REFUSE•LIEN FEE 3860 /BOOTING RELEASE FEE 3861 /HAZARDOUS MAT PERMIT 1 12: 3862 /ALARM PERMIT FEE OBJECT SUBTOTAL ,k* CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH _ .. _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0003 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR -COMPLETE . UNREALIZED.. EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE . BALANCE % • • ---- • • -a- 3840 3841 38563857 3858 3859 3900 OTHER 3901 3902 3903 3904 3913 3955 3956 OBJECT • • 42 REVENUE - /SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR -/CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS /CITY OFFICES RECYCLING OPERATING TRANSFERS IN /RESDL EQUITY TRSFR IN DEPT 0000 SUBTOTAL FUND TOTAL TOTALS 320. 00 640. 00 10.00 170.00 30.00 85.0 500. 00- 2r429:78 1,280: 28----179O. 28 ---256: 0 ------ 0. 00 0. 00 35. 00 35. 00- 0. 0 1, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0 1, 000. 00----------170.00 880. 00 - ----- ---- - -120. 00 ---- 88. 0 -- 376, 644. 00 32, 155. 43 234, 063. 67 142. 580. 33 62. 1 273.75 -- 72.6-- 4,383.14 48.4 10, 645. 00 450. 00 320. 00 59.8 50.0 66.6 4 7 9 6 10 11 11: 14 13 19 11 10 1,061,669.00 • 0:00 ' 1,056,669.14 . 4,999.86 99.5 '. 500.00 - 13,347.89 .-• 13,764.30 13,264.30- - 2752.8 • 500.00. 0.00 7,070.73-- - --- --.-6;570:73-,---1414.1 500.00 1,078.00 1,742.77 1,242.77- 348.5 64.00 0.00 63.81 0.19 99.7 - 1, 654, 039. 00 - --- -138, 347. 08 -17100, 650. 64 .553. 388. 36- -- ----66. 5 ----• ' 118,836.00 9,903.00 79,224.00 39,612.00 66.6 2,836,108.00 162,675.97 2,259,185.39 576,922.61 79.6 10, 793, 333. 00 810,491.95 7,457,524.15 3, 335, 808. 85 69. 0 10, 793, 333. 00 810, 491.95 7, 457, 524. 15 3. 335, 808. 85 69. 0 • •• C 3 6 -7- r FINANCE—FA484 TIME 13: 07: 33 • - • FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION . _ • 105 LIGHTING.DISTRICT FUND 0000---- — - CITY.OF.HERMOSA-BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0004 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 66.0X OF -YEAR -COMPLETE EST REV MONTHLY REV UNREALIZED YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 4 7, 3100 TAXES 3101 - /CURRENT—YEAR- SECURED -322 094-00 31.229-1O ri4 " . 3103 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 26, 000. 00 • ' - 2, 925. 82 17, 522. 55 . • 8, 477. 45 ' 67. 3 348, 094. 00 '' 34, 154. 92 '': .'' ' 212, 257. 97 135, 83.6. 03 60.9 . i., 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 1.71 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 81, 550. 00 9. 065. 21 63, 266. 15 18, 283. 85 77. 5 OBJECT SUBTOTAL— -81. 550. 00. -9,-065721 63, 266.-15 -------18, 283: 85 --77: 5 • .: 3900 OTHER REVENUE . 3955-----/OPERATING-TRANSFERS-IN----------492.00---L---------07-00 ------492. , OL.:n OBJECT SUBTOTAL 492. 00 O. 00 492. 00 O. 00 100. 0 IL: ' DEPT 0000 —TOTALS 430, 136: 00- 43.-220.1-3 276, 016.-12 —1 54, 11988 . , FUND TOTAL 430, 136. 00 43, 220. 13 276, 016. 12 177, 27 27 34 37 r 73) 44 411,- 54 17 . • - 154, 119. 88 64. 1 3 4 15 16 IC 70 21 22 47 31 3. .33 44 41 • • ir mil', • FINANCE-FA484 TIfiE 13:07:53 ----- , FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION J.7 - 110 PARKING FUND --- DEPARTMENT 0000. 0'1 r. 54 te CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - '1A REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0005 - = 7 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 ' ' ' EST REV MONTHLY REV ••. 66:-0% OF YEAR COMPLETE' UNREALIZED YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES - 3302 /COURT-FINES/PARKING-------- 1, 427, 568. 00 109, 668. 80 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 427, 568. 00 109, 668. 80 -«3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 23, 057. 00 398. 66 3407 /PARKING LOT RENTAL 18, 792. 00 2, 640. 11 3409 /LOT 13 22,990.00 1, 915. 84 3413 /VPD LEASE 70, 000. 00 4, 935. 07 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 134, 839. 00 9, 889. 68 3800 CURRENT SERVICE 3842 3844 3845 3846 3847 3848 3849 3850 OBJECT 3900 OTHER 3902 ••• 3904 3955 OBJECT DEPT 0000 SUBTOTAL REVENUE SUBTOTAL FUND TOTAL CHARGES /PARKING METERS 700, 000. 00 /PARKING PERMITS: ANNUAL 185, 000. 00 /DAILY PARKING PERMITS 1, 000. 00 /VPD LOT PERMITS/DAILY 8, 000. 00 -/VPD LOT PERMITS/MONTHLY 10, 000. 00 /VALIDATION STAMPS /DRIVEWAY PERMITS /GUEST PERMITS. /CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS /BUDGETED TRANSFERS IN TOTALS • - • 22, 000. 00 600. 00 900. 00 1, 500. 00 929, 000. 00 4, 230. 00 50. 00 3, 033. 00 7, 313. 00 2, 498, 720. 00 2, 498, 720. 00 864,150.38 -- 864,150.38 563,417.62 - 60.5 L -- - 9, 453. 52 13. 603. 48 41. 0 13, 785. 86 5, 006. 14 73. 3 15, 326: 72 -------- 7, 663. 28 66. 6 46, 343. 61 23, 656. 39 66. 2 84, 909. 71 49, 929. 29 62. 9 48, 830. 94 43, 412. 50 0. 00 556. 26 1, 104. 00 2, 308. 74 195. 50 785. 00 451, 282. 84 61.994. 00 ------- 890. 00 5, 546. 23 6, 568. 65- 17, 622. 03 20. 00 620. 00 96, 449. 94 545, 972. 75 4,229.79 0. 00 0. 00 4, 229. 79 220, 238. 21 220, 238. 21 248, 717. 16 64. 4 123,006:00 33.5' 110. 00 89. 0 2, 453. 77 69. 3 3.431:65. 4, 377. 97 80. 1 185. 00- 130. 8 880. 00 383. 027. 25 41. 3 58. 7 4,229.79 0. 21 99. 9 0. 00 50. 00 0. 0 3, 033. 00 - 0. 00 100. 0 7, 262. 79 50. 21 99. 3 _ . 1, 502, 295. 63 996, 424. 37 60. 1 1, 502, 295. 63 996. 424. 37 60.1 • CITY OF-HERMOSA-BEACH . .12 FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME 13: 07: 53 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 ---• • • .- .... --_-_-_-- FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV 7 [115 STATE GAS TAX FUND iT. ----DEPARTMENT 0000 - r, 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY • PAGE • 0006, DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR -COMPLETE UNREALIZED YEAR TO DATE BALANCE -•••\ 2 /INTEREST -INCOME-- -- -23, 963. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 23,963.00 2,951.64 -INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE • • 124 DEPT 0000 17, 248:-18 ------73: 9 17.714.82 6,248. 18 73.9 .:0 2.1 3501 - . • /SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION 85,690.00 0.00 50,470.63 35.219.37 58.8 3502 /SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 176,184.00 59.2 21 3503 /SECT 2107:5 ALLOCATION 4,000.00 10:0:C())0 104,459.01 71,724.99 4, 000. 00 ------------ 0. 00---100. 0 ------- 3522 /TDA ARTICLE 3 (68821) 5,568.00 0.00 0.00 5.568.00 0.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 271,442.00 0.00. 158,929.64 112,512.36 58.5 3900 OTHER REVENUE :.,: , 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 10,000.00 416.66 8,333.35 1,666.65 - 83.3 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 10.000.00- . 446.-66 8,333.35-:13 '11 1i 666.-65 '------ -83. 3-----7 - 3= TOTALS 305,405.00 ' 3,368.30 184,977.81 120,427.19 60.5 . n 31 -.2 r; • FUND TOTAL- -305, 405: 00 -3; 368.-30 184.. 977: 81 ' 120,-427. 19 --- ---- 60. 5- • 41e, FINANCE-FA484 I. TI1'IE 13:07:53 ri FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION I'- 120 COUNTY GAS TA% FUND I, . DEPARTMENT 0000 r-1"i ,:.:1 I'- -- -- - 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 - /INTEREST INCOME ---- OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 EST REV PAGE 0007 DATE 03/14/90 66.0%-0E-YEAR-COMPLETE- UNREALIZED 6.O% OF..YEAR--COMPLETE- UNREALIZED MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE iG 2,145.00 32.48 3601 /COUNTY AID TO CITIES 0.00 j,. OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 DEPT 0000 ' TOTALS 2,145.00 r:: • FUND TOTAL 2, 145. 00 860:51 860. 51 ----1;284.49 1,284.49 0.00 0.00 32. 48 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 860. 51 1, 284. 49 40. 1 32. 48 860. 51 ar z r r ••., • • • • . • CITY FINANCE-FA484 OF HERMOSA BEACH ------------ ----- - - '- - - -'-- ----- ------ — ' ""-- - ------ " ' ",), REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME 13: 07: 53 . PAGE 0008 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 — DATE 03/14/90 66. 0/. OF YEARCOMPLETE E' w UNREAL I ZED e ti OBJ DESCRIPTION 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES FUND . _ EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE " _ _ ..... _ ..____ _.. BALANCE % O c...,.. ':..: ..., 12. 15 1C j 20i 068.-00 2; 568: 00------ -7114: 6 '----- i-5 20, 068. 00 2, 568. 00- 114. 6 - ok 46, 167. 00 11, 295. 90 74, 016. 37 27, 849. 37- 160. 3 .21 46, 167. 00 11, 295. 90 74, 016. 37 27, 849. 37- 160.3 2.1 . IN - -- 1, 056, 506. 00---- -- 0: 00-17056, 505. 60 - ----- - - --- 0:40 ---- 99: 9--- LIEU 240, 000. 00 26, 961. 00 111, 903. 00 128. 097. 00 46. 6 • 1, 296, 506. 00 26, 961. 00 1, 168, 408. 60 128, 097. 40 90. 1 DEPT 0000 -TOTALS 1, 360, 173:00 31; 955:-90 —1-7262,-492. 97 97i 680. 03 — .9278 3, FUND -----DEPARTMENT 0000 r- 1 12 3100 TAXES •;--------------- 3116 . ..-.- ...L.:-.--- --/PARK-RECFACILITY.TAX -17,500.00 6i -301-00- r : ..I • OBJECT SUBTOTAL ' 17,500.00 6.301.00- 3400 USE OF MONEY- &-PROPERTY----------- 3401 - /INTEREST INCOME kj OBJECT SUBTOTAL 41 ,,1 • -- 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3910 /PARK/RECREATION IN 3956 /RESDL EGUITY-TRSFR- . • :: OBJECT SUBTOTAL ft. 25 . "• rL 33 31 22 34 r- FUND TOTAL 1, 360, 173. 00 31,955.90 1,262,492.97 97, 680. 03 92. 8 a , -co CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - - /IF mi 1 FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0009 '- 'w TIME 13: 07: 53. FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 66:0% OF YEAR- COMPLETE r ' UNREALIZED • FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE % 126 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND I DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES /UTILITY USER TAX 816, 508. 00 69, 994. 38 510, 362. 58 306, 145. 42 62.-5 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 816, 508. 00 69, 994. 38 510, 362. 58 306, 145. 42 62. 5 •••••-- 3400 USE OF MONE-1( & PROPERTY • 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 31, 455. 00 26, 896. 79 48, 113. 22 16, 658. 22- 152. 9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 31, 455. 00 26, 896. 79 48, 113. 22 16, 658. 22- 152. 9 41 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 /SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 11, 275. 00 3, 949. 00- .- 11, 274. 58 O. 42 • 99. 9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 11, 275. 00 - 3, 949. 00---- 11, 274;58 - - O. 42. 99. 9 OLL ______ DEPT 0000 TOTALS 859; 238. 00 92, 942. 17 569, 750. 38 289, 487. 62 66. 3 --,1 FUND TOTAL 859, 238. 00 • 92; 942. 17 569;750';-38 -289, 487; '62- 66: 3 . • ah, FINANCE-FA484 TIME 13:07:-,3_ r 7 4r ri r r •7 CITY OF HERMOSA'BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV 127 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND ------DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3120 -/UTILITY USER -TAX 1..224i-762:00- 104:991-.-56 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1,224,762.00 • 104,991.56i -------3400 USE OF MONEY -&-PROPERTY YEAR TO DATE 765r543:-82 765,543.82 PAGE 0010 DATE 03/14/90 66.04 OF YEAR -COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE % -459:218.18 - 5--- 459.59. 218. 18 62. 5 3401 • /INTEREST INCOME 4,765.00 . 269.49 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4,765.00 269.49 41.. DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1,229,527.00 105.261.05. I-, 4111,.,3 143 r.6 FUND TOTAL 4, 214. 53 550. 47 88. 4 4,214.53 550. 47 88. 4 769,758.35 459,768.65 62.6 1,229,527.00 105,261.05 769,758.35 459,768.65 62.6 • • • _ .. ..... ----' - - ' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ------- --- ' FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) � PAGE 0011 ` 1� 5 TIME 13: 07: 53 FROM 02m1/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03m4/90 " Is -�- '--- -' ' 66. 0% OF -YEAR COMPLETE ° ��" � UNREAL � . ° .m r FUND OBJ DESCR IPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE ^ . ' 140 COMMUNITYi ��/, DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND � 0 "'� -- DEPARTMENT 0000- -- '^ ' " r`' '^ 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY ." iti --------- o�o� /INTEREST 'INCOME —--- �- — 1.63e.00 ------ -8,21 4.695:e3'-------3.057.83- �o�a------� ." oo�screuoror�� �.�oa oo ��o�- � 4, 695. o.o��oo- oea 6 :E 445 �`^ ' ." .�--'—'----�o7on ImrsnGovsewmsw7/psosnAL'---'-------- . ~ = �, 3713m�eI� REHABILITATION �.o�.� 0. 00 0. 00 9�0�� oo � � ___� or1« /PROJECT TOUCH 7, 670. 00 1, 450. 00 1, 450. 00 6, 220. 00 18. 9 2:,�0 3715 - /000c ADMINISTRATION '----'-12.276.00 '------1.615.00 3, 850. 00 -- -'e.o2a:oo--- o1o-'---- /or16 /SO BAY FREE CLINIC 4.200.00 1.050.00 1.050.00 3.150.00 25 o `o717 /JUVENILE DIVERSION 3, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3, 000. 00 0.0 = /SO BAY COALITION m-zos—onn.ow—O. 00 o.00'-- — - —— 000mw--'u. o —----' ' 111.1 3719 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /1736 HOUSE 2.544.00 ^.`..^^.". 0. 00 2.544.00 0. 00 100 0 :,--� �1 j2,..: °.�/z.o 8.894.00 113.121.00 -ra 1 i,« TOTALS 123, 653. 00 �.�o� 79 �n oe� 83 �xo o�n 17 �o 9 �? ` �.. �' ��� `` ' _ / `, . . ,. rumo TOTAL 123, 653. 00 4, 106. 79 13, 589 83 110, 063. 17 1o.9 ...: DEPT 0000 �� 9' / • 111';, rImomns-FA484 TIME 13:07:33 -FUND_--� ` 145 PROPOSITION 'A -umvr', 3100 TAXES -/PROPOSITION . A -TRANSIT ---200,000. 00----yi 34,um r.° • 31e1 suansomL INCENTIVE FUNDS 16.331.00 O. 00 `"/ OBJECT SUBTOTAL e16.331.00 1.1n4.00- |�_-_-_---_--_-_ 3400 USE OF MONEY It PROPERTY � 3401 /INTEREST INCOME �n��o�oo �.ao��u� ��.npo�o� 872. 98 �� o -�` _ -- OBJECT SUBTOTAL—'—� ---'---- '------'----17.46o.00'------�o.•ao5,z4 1a.o9o.o2----'----'-oro.9o------95�o------- 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES - 3e54 /rAnse.-oIAL'A nIDE --- ---- ---- ------ 7.BOO: on --- -----2.*r2.eo-------o.4ro,o5--- -5, 327. -o1-r 3855 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /BUS PASSES 4.000.00 11'800 .00 600. 00 3, 072. 4.07e.00 6 ,550.85 �7800- 5, 249. 15 1o1v 55.5 ;______._ �/= 3900 OTHER REVENUE _--_-_ -- 3902 /nsruwoa/eszna PREV YR o.no4.puo. 1o' 4, 903. 13 4, 903. 13- o 0 ��- ----- 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN ------ --- ----------340.00-----------0,00 000.00 ------'-- 'o 00----100.m----,---- r- ,,, --,----r_`, OBJECT SUBTOTAL 340. 00 4, 903. 13 5, 243. 13 4, 903. 13- 1542 o i" 3 1-'------' ospr 0000 "24 5.9o*oo---------- -9.*47:- 22----'-157'978.00-� ----ar.-9oa.on----- 64. 2.--- ----- — r- `" CI:��������� � CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0012 2 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 ��� " 66704 OF Ysxn'TompLsrs" UNREAL Izso " EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE ` = `^ lc 0. 00 16.331.00 o.o ' `` 129.59*00 86 737. 00 59. 9 ".`e "' = r ,^ � _- ` . Q FINANCE-FA484 T 111E 13:07:53 r':::! 6-1 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 150 GRANT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 - 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 3, 340. 00 3. 340. 00 24 1. 24- 1,886.52 1,886.52 . PAGE 0013 DATE 03/14/90 66'0% OF-YEAR'COMPLETE--. 3" `S' UNREALIZED:. 6 .A BALANCE % ' rc: -"" 1:453.48 1. 453. 48 56:4- 56.4 6: '4-"' 56.4 ,4 �. ,:, .i 3517 /OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFET 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 3528 /PER CAPITA GRANT 58, 000.00 0.00 0.00 58, 000.00 0.0 3529 /WILDLIFE GRANT 20, 204. 00 - -- 0.00 0. 00 -20,204.00- 0.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 78, 204. 00 0. 00 0. 00 78, 204. 00 0. 0 3700INTERGOVERNMENT/FEDERAL 3701 /FEDERAL AID URBAN 200, 000.00 0.00 38, 999.50 161, 000.50 19.4 3712 /FED EMERG MGMT AGENCY 89, 738.00 0.00 0.00 89, 738.00 0.0 ------------- OBJECT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 289, 738. 00 -- - -0:00 38,999.50 250,738.50 13.4" 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3904 - /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS --. '0. 00 _.. __........._..__...__..0. 00----..1.264: 64="--"-----'t 264:64----"'-0: 0''_--._ 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 16, 388.00 26,634.33- 10, 925.36 ' 5,462.64 66.6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 16, 388. 00 26,634.33- 9,660.72 6,727.28 58. 9 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 387, 670. 00 26.635.57- 50, 546. 74 337, 123. 26 FUND TOTAL 387, 670. 00 26. 635. 57- 50, 546. 74 13. 0 0 'i rImwmcs-r«48* TIME 13:07:33 ` !� r|, ^ !.:. rl" 3100 TAXES 00---------6i-545:-71----.---43,91���----29'57�or---���r---— r-• YEAR COLLECTIONS 5,000.00 415.83 ' `o.ao7.rn 1.392.30 72.1 :.; OBJECT SUBTOTAL ��� . 6,96,961.54��``:' 47,55.69 30,969.31 60.3r-42', 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 ' /INTEREST �.�i.� ��� 2,004.37 +43.37- 128.4 '-----'-- OBJECT ouororAL'------ ----�---------------'--1'561:00----- 373:98 e.004:o7------ --'*4o.or-----x2e 4--- 11,, -~~' 3900 OTHER REVENUE p______ ----3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS - -'--------- 303. 00 o.on------'--'�ooa ou 0.00 �oo o---'--- 0^" OBJECT SUBTOTAL 303. 00 0. 00 000 00 0. 00 100 0 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 155 CROSSING GUARD FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 --'— -- CITY OF *snmosA'osAo*'----------- --�--'-- ------'----- nsvsmus SUMMARY REPORT (BY ruwo)oo�« " PAGE ����� FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 ';215 -_-_-___--'. �' - OF YEAR COMPLETE , EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE UNREALIZED ' BALANCE z --------'-'-------' DEPT 000w' TOTALS- nw.00v:'oo 7F.335752 Aaa FUND TOTAL 80, 359. 00 7,335.52 __...... V " '^ E------ sJ FItANCE-FA484 TIME 13:07:53 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 160 SEWER FUND --DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 ----- 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3602 /BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANC OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3828 /SEWER 3829 /SEWER 3832 /SEWER OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL CONNECTION FEE DEMOLITION FEE LATERAL INSTALLTN TOTALS EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE PAGE 0015 I DATE 03/14/90 I 3 66.0% OF''YEAR COMPLETE 4 UNREALIZED BALANCE % • 81, 500. 00 81, 500. 00 -10,966:33 10, 966. 33 68, 198. 26 68, 198. 26 -13:301:74-83:6 13, 301.74 83.6 5, 000. 00 625. 94 5, 000. 00 625. 94 18, 000. 00 1, 200. 00 1, 500. 00 20, 700. 00 1, 155. 753.00 1, 155, 753.00 1, 262, 953. 00 2, 051. 00 2, 949. 00 41. 0 2, 051. 00 2, 949. 00 41. 0 4,668.34 9,983.76 0.00 200.00 4,778.34 11, 002.30 96, 230. 92 96, 230. 92 112, 601.53 770, 829. 36 8,016.24 55.4 381. 46 --.-- 68.2 1,300.00 13.3 9,697.70 53. 1 384, 923.64 66. 6 770,829.36- - 384, 923. 64•------66:6------ 852, 080. 92 1, 262, 953. 00 - ---- -112, 601: 080. 92 410, 872. 08 67. 4 410; 872:08 •yr 0 :• 3 FINANCE-FA484 TIME 13:07:33 L. f-'15, FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION (-; , 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND ---DEPARTMENT 0000 CITY OF HERMOSA - BEACH ------- - REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0016••• FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 66707.OF-YEAR--COMPLETE UNREAL I ZED` EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE • 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES ----- 3304 3304 /FORFEITED FUNDS - -- - 200, 000. 00 - - -• --0-.-00 -. 39,772.78-- • - 160. 227. 22 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 200, 000. 00 0. 00 . 39, 772. 78 160. 227. 22 --------3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY - - - - - 3401 . /INTEREST INCOME 7,810.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7,810.00 DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL TOTALS 207, 810. 00 400. 21 4, 552. 31 3, 257. 69 58. 2 400. 21 4, 552. 31 3,' 257. 69 58. 2 400. 21 207, 810. 00 400, 21 44, 325. 09 163, 484. 91 21. 3 44, 325. 09 163, 484. 91 • FINANCE-FA484 TIJ'IE 13:07:53 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND - DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 - /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3900 OTHER REVENUE - 3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 3912 /FIRE FLOW FEE - -- OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL TOTALS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -- REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0017 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 66.0A OF -YEAR COMPLETE EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANLIZED. BALANCE 9, 533. 00 -- ---- --- 2, 004. 21 9, 533. 00 2, 004. 21 0. 00 100. 000. 00 100, 000. 00 109, 533. 00 0. 00 15, 067. 00 -- 15, 067. 00 14r124.41- 14,124.41 4;124.41- 14,124.41 4; 591. 41-------148: 1 4, 591. 41- 148. 1 7,923.62 7,923.62- 0. 0 63, 647. 31 36, 352. 69 63. 6 71, 570: 93 -------- -- 28, 429. 07 --- - 71. 5 17, 071. 21 85, 695. 34 - 109, 533. 00 -17, 071- 21 - 85, 695.-34 --- -- ---23, • FINANCE-FA484 TIME 13:07:53 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 705 INSURANCE FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -- REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0018 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 -66.-07.-0E- YEAR "COMPLETE UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 - /INTEREST --INCOME --- - -----44, 948.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 44, 948. 00 OTHER REVENUE _.__._.___... _------------ --------.-_-__. 3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 3955.OPERATING TRANSFERS IN IN -DEPT-- INS OBJECT SUBTOTAL ---- DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL 955:-67.-----44: 38. 94- `; 19, 992. 33 - 24, 9$5. 67 44. 4 • :7 0 7 0. 00 0. 00 50, 191. 67 50, 191. 67- 0. 0 1, 764. 00 0. 00 1, 764. 00 0. 00 100. 0 766, 336. 00 57, 901: 11--------466, 615. 56 ----------- 299, 720. 44 --- 60. 8 768, 100. 00 57, 901..11- 518, 571.23 249, 528. 77 67 5 - - 813, 048. 00 --- - 57, 940x05 - 538, 563. 56 813, 048. 00 . 57, 940. 05- 538, 563. 56 274, 484. 44 66. 2 REPORT TOTALS - - -- 20, 709, 637: 00 -1r 373, 897:-05-13,-816:-288. 46-----•- 6,.893;.348. 7: .3:, FINANCE-FA454 4*z TIME 10: 42: 38 1-34 r" r. 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - - EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT- (BY -FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR --- 001 GENERAL.. FUND 1101 CITY COUNCIL DEPT: 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY ------- OBJECT SUBTOTAL APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. LEGISLATIVE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE C 2CJ OBJECT SUBTOTAL fb 7:7 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES --4315 MEMBERSHIP 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4319 SPECIAL EVENTS 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER-CHGa OBJECT SUBTOTAL DI (S32 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL fb 111 DIVISION TOTAL 21, 540. 00 0. 00 431. 00 431. 00 1, 828. 04 14, 591. 40 0. 00 111. 15 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 146. 86 18, 000. 00 2, 744. 50 14, 098. 40 40. 402. 00 4, 572. 54 29, 947. 81 PAGE -------0001 DATE 03/14/90 66. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 6, 000: 00 0. 00 6, 000: 00 6, 000. 00 0. 00 6. 000. 00 200. 00 9, 000. 00 5, 900. 00 5. 250. 00 1, 000. 00 2, 840. 00 24, 190. 00 1121 CITY CLERK DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 6, 948. 60 67. 7 0. 00 111. 15- 0. 0 O. 00 ------ - 431:00 - 0. 0 - -- 0. 00 715. 86- 0. 00 3, 901. 60 0.00 0;454:19 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 266.0 78.3 74.1 100.0 100. 0 58.73 175.93 675.42 7,466.38 2,432.00 -6,237.00 98.00- 708.00 0.00 222.59 385.39- .1,672.55 2,682.76 16,482.45 100. 00 0. 00 100. 00 0. 00 0. 00 24. 07 97. 9 0. 00 1, 533. 62 82. 9 0. 00 337.00-105. 7 ----- 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 4,542.00 13.4 777.41 22.2 1i167745 58. 8 7, 707. 55 68. 1 •1: 0. 00 100. 00 0. 0 0. 00 100. 00 0. 0 70, 692. 00 7, 255. 30 52, 430. 26 LEGISLATIVE 0.00 18,261.74 74.1 27, 815. 00 2, 371. 00 18, 331. 00 556. 00 0. 00 0. 00 556. 00 0. 00 0. 00 12. 000. 00 0. 00 4, 949. 99 40, 927. 00 2, 371. 00 23, 280. 99 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 20. 300. 00 20, 300. 00 831. 00 2, 006. 00 0. 00 0.00 43.94 398. 63 160. 00 160. 00 609:71 875.41 0. 00 9, 484. 00 65. 9 0.00 556.00 0.0 0. 00 556. 00----------- 0. 0 0. 00 7, 050. 01 41. 2 0. 00 17, 646. 01 56. 8 0. 00 20, 140. 00 0. 00 --------------20, 140;00 -- 0. 7 0. 00 221:29 73. 3 O. 00 1, 130. 59 43.6 •! • • A - F I NANCE-FA454 TIME 10: 42: 38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR -001- GENERAL- FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - -- - - -- -•--EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT----(BY-FUND-) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 1121 CITY CLERK DEPT: LEGISLATIVE PAGE -----0002 DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X r„ 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4315 MEMBERSHIP 220. 00 100. 00 205. 00 -• 4316 TRAINING __.___....__....._._ ----•----..-.----450. 00 ------- 50. 00 _ _.._ 50:'00 r ., 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 600. 00 O. 00 296. 80 4323 PUBLIC NOTICING 8, 800. 00 532. 70 6, 231. 14 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER-CHGS-------'-2, 534. 00 - --- 170. 61------ 1, 551. 24 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 15, 441. 00 954. 66 9, 819. 30 •-u 5400 EQUIPMENT ......... _. _.._.._......._.. ---- _....................... 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 513.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 513.00 0.00 21 7,3 21 DIVISION TOTAL 1122 ELECTIONS 77, 181. 00 3, 325. 66 DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 20,650.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 20, 650. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 367. 32 367. 32 0. 00 15. 00 -0: 00- 400.00 0. 00 303. 20 0. 00 2, 568'. 86 0. 00 982.76 0. 00 5, 621. 70 93. 1 -11.-1- 49. 4 70. 8 "61.' 2 63. 5 15 ,c !n 0.00 145.68 71.6 =. 0. 00 145. 68 71.6 =', . 33, 627. 61 0. 00 43, 553. 39 43. 5 1.386. 50 1,386.50 970. 09 970. 09 4304 TELEPHONE 287. 00 - 0. 00 287. 00 • F --------'• 4305 OFFICE OPER-SUPPLIES. 894. 00-- - 113.32 951:-07 r.„ 4316 TRAINING 0.00 0.00 0. 00 .:c 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 563.00 0.00 411.60 37-------------- OBJECT SUBTOTAL ... _ 744. 00 --.._._...- ------._. 113. 32 - -1',•649. 67 r-, ;;-.`.... - -- DIVISION ,.,d e•. 1131 CITY ATTORNEY 0. 00 19, 679. 91 4. 6 0. 00 19, 679. 91 4. 6 .•i } -11 0. 00 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 - - --...57: 07-r106. 3.._`_ 0. 00 0. 00 • 0. 0 0. 00 151. 40 73. 1 0. 00 "` _._ 94. 33 TOTAL- -22,-3947-00 "1, 499. 82 2, 619. 76 0. 00'"-------19;'774:24----1-1" 6----"- -- DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 150, 000. 00 11, 174. 72 72, 679. 44 ' 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT ----'-"- 1, 400. 00 O. 00 --' "' .. 912. 05 - OBJECT SUBTOTAL ' 151, 400. 00 11, 174. 72 73, 591. 49 -4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER - - - --• 4304 TELEPHONE 2, 400. 00 31. 47 229. 73 1,4 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1.650.00 2.40 189.68 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE ...._-__.___.__.___ 1, 000. 00 -- 0. 00 _._-_.. 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 050. 00 33. 87 ' 419. 41 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 334. 13 0. 00 334. 13 77, 320. 56 48. 4 77, 808. 51 48. 6 2, 170. 27 9. 5 1, 126. 19 ' 31. 7 4,296.46 14.9 • � � 4 " pzmAmcs-FA45* TIME 10: 42: 38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR oo1-mcwsnA--FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - -- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY -'-FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 ----- DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE / z r^ �______ ____ ozvzsIow_rorAL___�_ 156,450 .00 11,208 .59 1132 CITY PROSECUTOR ---- '---- - ' -,�--'----- v ,ioEpr LEGISLATIVE '" T.) 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES - y~.^ 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 25.440.00 2.120.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 25,440.00 2,120.00 r., 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES *201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 25.600.00 2,420 .00 , OBJECT SUBTOTAL 25'600.00 2,420 .00- 41 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER u*oo--------920.00---------12866- • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 920. 00 128. 66- r� � � /- 334.13 82,104.97 47.5 16, 960. 00 � ' `��� 0. 00 16, 960. 00 8, 480. 00 66. 6 0. 00 8, 480. oo 66. 6 3, 080. 00 3, 080. oo 536.65 0.00 0.0022,520.00 22,520.00 o`no---------ueo no 0. 00 383. 35 , 12. o 2:: 12:o-----'� .1^ 58.3 DIVISION TOTAL 51.960.00 4.411.3* /� 20.576.65\�'''� , � 0.00 31.383.35 39.6 1141.CITY TREASURER DEPT. 'LEGISLATIVE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC xo.80700-_�,o�.�-m'�o:oo 0.�--4:oo7� �- ���n.- *r-^.. REGULAR OVERTIME 500. 00 o oo 501 99 n oo 1. 99- 100.34110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 256. 00 o oo o oo o uo 256. 00 o.n°^1/ ACCRUAL CASH IN 256. 00 . - O. 00 247: 00 o� ono�r:oo O. uo ' .9. 00 411z PART TIME/TEMPORARY 9'noo oo 750. 00 a'o«o.00 O. 00 o.000.00 `aa aooJsor SUBTOTAL 22, 819. 00 1 - ~ y-," 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ---'----- ----'-------�--------- -- --'- -- _ ��ox CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 2, 000. no uoo ' ao�o o om � 916. 50 4 1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL. -- • y_^. � _-. "° °" u�o--�--'-'����a�-----� no*�'----�--�� • 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER '�! |400«^-^^ ^~~~ '«oo5 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 74. O. 00 -~. 93 70 2' 0. 4315 MEMBERSHIP 62. 53 853. 22 0. 00 546. 78 e v1' 400. 00 4316 ~^~^~~'"18 •5. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 185. 00 n o250.00--0.00 -o�on- u� om~~~�ooo� o - 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE ' . 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 000 00 844. oo 0. 00 6n nn- 0. 00 '15a oo 0. 00 o�»o 500. 00 o.o ----' OBJECT SUBTOTAL • �.apvoo691. 46 ,62. �ra� o� �^��':oo w'»v------'o,00x. 17 51. -1 -4 o400 EQUIPMENT - 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *000------ano.00 ----'-'--o oo------o-oo o� oo-ono�om----o�o- OBJECT SUBTOTAL aoo� oo o� oo � o� oo o.o 800. 00 0. 0 '| I. . • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (r----FINANCE-FA454 ------------------EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT -(BY -FUND) TIME 10:42:38 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 ✓ 5 •:•; ✓ , DIVISION ..TOTAL . 30,498.00 1,892.09 17,750.32 1 r, , DEPARTMENT TOTAL 409,175.00 29,592.80 201,015.50 1 -,-------1201-CITY MANAGER ----------DEPT:---MGMT/SUPPORT .:! I • FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP ---001-GENERAL FUND PAGE- -0004 DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE . % 4.1 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES ------4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC----- 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN ---------4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL ...; .. --101; 616: 00 • ----- ------- 1, 848. 00 . 0. 00 0. 00 1, 848. 00 0. 00 1, 146. 68 3, 900. 00 210. 00 847: 00 109, 212. 00 8, 296. 02 • 67, 085. 25 1 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - 1 • I 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 300.00 11.50 173.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 300.00 11.50 173.00 1.„.1 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER . ri 4304 TELEPHONE 800.00 58.37 383.48 0.00 416.52 47.9 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES " 1,500.00 -76.35 -1;242:79 -0.00 : -257.21 ---- 82. 8 • ---------- d:- 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 350.00 8.43 115.41 0.00 - 234.59 32.9 125. 00 O. 00 90.07 O. 00 34. 93 72 0 4315 MEMBERSHIP -1.150.00 - 0.00' -606%38 O. 00 ..-..i r..:•,.,1 .7.3! 4317 COEXPENSE 4316 TRAINING 3, 181. 00 O. 00 3. 95 3, 087. 05 2. 9 NFERENCE :.! 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER-CMGS 2,900.00 5,481.00* 33.00 1,469.96 0.00 1,430.04 50.6 7 ' -517.45- -3,297.86- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 15,487.00 341.30-. 7,299.90 0.00 8,187.10 47.1 13.3! 31 DIVISION TOTAL 124,999.00 7,966.22 74,558.15 0.00 50,440.85 59.6 0. 00 12,747.68 334.13 207,825.37 • 58.2 49.2 0. 00 -36, 524: 43 64. 0 0. 00 1, 848. 00 0. 0 0.00 701.32 62.0 0. 00-----3; 053: 0021. 7 ------- 0. 00 42, 126. 75 61. 4 0. 00 127. 00 57. 6 0.00 127.00 57.6 • ; 4 ' c e4 7 :2 a I r el r•i•,•1 1202 FINANCE ADMIN Ini 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF. 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY • 191, 120:00- ---- --15, 556. 93 --- ---•--121•; ---_ ,.. 2, 523. 00 69, 138. 00 ---- - 63.8 - - ---- 120. 20 2, 735. 42 0. 00 212. 42- 108. 4 - ... 3, 855. 00 0. 00 101. 83 0. 00 3, 753. 17 ' 2. 6 • 5 000 003.855,00 O. 00 -2, 1, 516. 09 --------- 60. 6 ----- - - .. - 5,220.12 d OBJECT SUBTOTAL 206,353.00 15,677.13 132,378.28 _ . . . . 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES . 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL - - 0. 00 220.12- 104.4 0. 00 73, 974. 72 64. 1 51, 910. 00 900. 00 36, 979. 87 900. 00 14, 030 13 72 9 --- 51 910. 00 900. 00-- -36, 979. 87- - 900. 00 -- • - 14,030. 13- ---- 72. 9- • • , - F INANCE-FA454 fir(_ TIME 10: 42: 38 r In • FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001- GENERAL FUND - 1202 FINANCE ADMIN DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE -------- r 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT. SUBTOTAL 41- 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) --"-- FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION MGMT/SUPPORT MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 2, 563. 00 197. 62 10, 772. 00 188. 52 225. 00 0. 00 2, 460. 00 108. 41 150. 00» 597. 65- ----- 1, 700. 00 - 7, 888. 00 25, 608. 00 1, 046. 90 15, 624. 20 1, 430. 86 7, 247:45 220. 00 1, 529. 24 397. 01 4, 799. 64 DATE 03/14/90 66. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 1, 132. 14 55. 8 0. 00 5. 00 97. 7 0. 00 930. 76 62. 1 0. 00 1 i 302. 99 23:3 0. 00 3, 088. 36 60. 8 0. 00 9, 983. 80 61. 0 400. 00 0. 00 110. 76 400. 00 - 0. 00 110. 76 284. 271-. 00- -17; 624: 03 1203 PERSONNEL DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT • 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF r 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE- -15,480:00- 1,291:64- -10,-090:12 (H 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 11, 320. 00 2, 372. 22 4, 174. 92 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 26, 800. 00 3, 663. 86 14, 265. 04 185, 093. 11 0. 00 289. 24 27. 6 0. 00 • 289. 24 27: 6 900.00- '98,277-89----'66-4. ------- 53, 729. 00 4, 529. 68 36, 178. 09 --1.043. 00 0. 00 0. 00- 1, 043. 00 0. 00 541. 20 3, 900. 00 210. 00 847. 00 -59, 715. 00 4, 739. 68 -37,- 566: 29- rd 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 900.00 164.00 697.85 0.00 -------- -- --4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES- -- - - -5,000. 00 376.77 ----- . 2,697:21 00 Ilk • 'I . : • 4315 MEMBERSHIP 710.00 0.00 597.50 0.00 4316 TRAINING 3,625.00 0.00 892.00 118.95 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE - 1,070.00 0.00 527.08 0.00 0.1 4320 MEDICAL EXAMS 22 500.00 326.00 4,551.92 0.00 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 2,289.00 205.68- 1,383.11 0.00 ------- OBJECT SUBTOTAL ' -- -36,094.00 661:09' ----11.346:67 118.95 * d • 5400 EQUIPMENT - 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 -- -400:00- ' -0.00' 10:-00 0.00 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 r „1 r 0. 00 17, 550. 91 67. 3 0. 00 -1. 043. 00------- 0. 0 ---------- 0. 00 ' 501.80 51.8 0. 00 3, 053. 00 21. 7 0. 00 22.71 62. 9 109. 50 0. 00 109. 50 5, 280. 38 65. 8 7, 145. 08 36. 8 12, 425. 46 53. 6 202. 15 77. 5 2. 302. 79 - 53. 9 112. 50 84. 1 2, 614. 05 27. 8 542. 92 49. 2 17, 948. 08 20. 2 905. 89 60. 4 *---- -24,-628. 38 ------31. 7 390. 00 2:5- •• 800. 00 0. 0 -•4 1. .,• • • • • nw'. " . , .. i.' DIVISION TOTAL x23.809. 00 9.n�.� '`` '_--_ __ 1205 CABLE TV DEPT: mumr/ooppoer CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH rIwAwcc-rw454 - ' ------'---'---------EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT -(oY'ruwo� AG 0006 rzms 1m42:oo °,'",'.. -. ..-_.-- ' FROM'~^'`" TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 _________ FOND DIV OBJT DESCR --001 GENERAL FUND 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 66oz OF YEAR COMPLETE �. ^.* , APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP vTDsxpND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENCoALANCs � 1.200.00 0. 00 ' !�[--------*1oo PERSONAL -SERVICES r$, 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 25.261.00 1'290.60 ii, 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 489 .00 0.00 ---- 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 489.00- 0 00 *112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 2,000.00 126 .00 . OBJECT SUBTOTAL 28,239..00 1,416.60-' 10. 00 ug ^ , 7 171- 10 " `^ � 13, 165. 54 563. 93 O. 00 1.000.on 15, 107. 47 0. 00 12, 075. 46 52.1 0. 00 74: 93- /15.o 0.00---------489.00- -o.o------- o.00 642. 00 67. 9 0. 00 13,131.53 oo.« - 4200 400n oowrnAor SERVICES 4201 SERVICE/PRIVATERACT OBJECT SUBTOTAL ^'~~~.~~ .000.00 - "."u 0. 00 -u.*1u.00- 3, 610. 00 "-n.6,o-. n nn ^^"" -, 610. 00 361. 0 . 4; 610. 00 361.0 4111 ' 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER .;-------- 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ----------roo.00 '------- 7. 102- ------197:0e---------300oo'o"9�-----�x it 4315 MEMBERSHIP �oo oo 0. 00 0. 00 ^'"v 1, 000. oo uo | .- o oo *o oo o oo 4316 TRAINING ~. "=00 184. 00-----o00 /-'^ 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 500. 00 O. 00 437on m un _` . *396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER o*oo 533. 00 14. 32- 335 «o o oo r-----'---- OBJECT SUBTOTAL -' ---------- o.600.ou - ' 142. 7e ---- -'-1.198:48 ----------300on ••• 63. 00 87.« 197.60 62.9 '^ 5400 EQUIPMENT T.:-- -------- - 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN wnoo--------- o�on'-'-' - -- u.on- 53:32 0.00' --------no oo---�--o'n r = 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN p500 5.000.00 0. 00 0. 00 ouo 00 o.o00 • o 0 T ��__-'_--___ .~~"^. SUBTOTAL 5, 000. 00 O. 00 53. 32 o 00 ^. 946. --ae 1.0 d' y-~ 1206 DATA PROCESSING DEPT: mGmrroupponr DIVISION TOTAL 37, 922. 00 1. 559. 38 12. 749. 27 �---• '--- 4,on p=��""^ �=�,,.-. -- ._.-~.`^ .^.~^== •., 4102 REGULAR SALAR I ES /M ISC 83, 320. 00 6,o08. 00 n1.031. 60 o. 00 32,o88. 40 61 o 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 000 oo 2*.87e.73 o*.o . 40 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1.�oo00 OBJECT SUB 86, 650. 00 a 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 �'�nu�oo o o ,="� 6, 008. 51. 827. 25 0. 00 35, 092. 75 59. 6 MN J 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE _1���00 �99 ���� «��_o'o�.o�0.oo .177. 12 ' 41. 1 '= - -_ - F I NANCE-FA434 TIME 10:42:38 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 001 GENERAL FUND 1206 DATA PROCESSING DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT •.........................5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN !..7 OBJECT SUBTOTAL !77 DIVISION (-:27 1207 BUS LICENSE 127 DATE 03/14/90 2 -, 66. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE J 1 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 107, 416. 00 3, 348. 99 44, 238. 88 3. 000. 00 11.348:00 3. 000. 00 670. 00 3, 300. 00 850. 00 2, 220. 00 24, 388. 00 0. 00 63, 177. 12 41. 1 227. 99 1, 600. 12 884. 87 254:87 0. 00 513. 47 0.00 120. 00 0. 00 2, 518. 77 0. 00 424. 05 233. 46- 1, 327. 64 879. 40 -10; 758: 92 $500- 0. 00 0. 00- 442:'29- $500 19, 518. 00 0. 00 1, 965. 82 19, 518. 00 0. 00 2, 408. 11 TOTAL 238, 242. 00 10, 236. 39 109, 233. 16 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 0. 00 1, 399. 88 41. 53 7, 051: 60 41. 54 2, 444. 99 0. 00 550. 00 0. 00 781. 23 0. 00 425. 95 0. 00 892. 36 83. 07 -13, 546.01 53.3 37.8 18.5 17.9 76.3-- -- 49.8 59.8 44:4 0. 00 -442. 29- 0. 0 0.00 17, 552. 18 10. 0 0. 00 17, 109. 89 12. 3 83. 07 128, 925. 77 45. 8 4102 REGULAR SALAR IES/MISC 62, 000. 00 5, 956. 34 36, 328. 18 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500.00 0.00 0.00 --- 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 1, 664. 00 O. 00 0 O. 00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1, 664. 00 O. 00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 65, 828. 00 5, 956. 34 36, 328. 18 r-., 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 0. 00 25, 671. 82 , 58. 5 0.00 500.00 0.0 0. 00 - 1, 664. 00 --• '''' - • 0. 0 0. 00 1, 664. 00 0. 0 0. 00 29, 499. 82 55. 1 - • 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 52.00 0.00 26.78 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 160. 00 O. 00 37. 95 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 212. 00 0. 00 64. 73 -• -- 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 500. 00 20. 52 212. 98 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4, 000. 00 465. 73 2, 670. 03 --- 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES---------- -- 350. 00 ----------- 44. 40 163:33 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE. 400.00 0.00 16.00 4315 MEMBERSHIP 50.00 0.00 40.00 4316 TRAINING.............. -----«---'--600.00-- 83.53'---341:03 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 600.00 0.00 492. 57 0. 00 25. 22 51. 5 0. 00 122. 05 23. 7 - O. 00 147. 27 30. 5 • _ 0. 00 287. 02 42. 5 0. 00 1, 329. 97 66. 7 0. 00 186. 67 •---- - 46. 6 0. 00 384. 00 4. 0 0. 00 10. 00 80. 0 0. 00 • 258. 97 56. 8 0. 00 107. 43 82. 0 44, 7 10 22 "' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - • - • • - - -- • -----•------•-•-----EXPENDITURE SUMMARY. REPORT---(BY-FUND 1.1 TIME 10:42:38 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 • FUND DIV OBJT DESCR PAGE -0008 DATE 03/14/90 2 git: 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE -001-GENERAL-FUND ---- APPROPRIATION ("se 1207 BUS LICENSE DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 4,704.00 392.64 - OBJECT SUBTOTAL •-• • •'•- -------11, 204. 00 - -221:54 ---------- DIVISION ----TOTAL 77.244.00 2, 848. 73 6,784.67 0. 00 0.00 1,855.27 4,419.-33 60.5 60.-5 -6r177.88 43,177.58 0.00 ----34,066:--42 55.8 r., 1208 GEN APPROP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES , 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MSC 21,926.00 1,941.00 15,232.73 0.00 6,693.27 69.4 • ------------4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF-------- --469.00------------ 0.00- Ch00 0.00- 469.00. 0.0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 469.00 0.00 ' 0.00 0.00 469.00 0.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 22,864.00 1,941.00 15,232.73 0.00 7,631.27 66.6 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES I IV 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 21,528.00 1,580.51 '', 9,453.06 ' 0.00 12,074.94 43.9 1'2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 21,528.00 -1,580,5t 9,453:06 0.00. 12,074:94 C -:. 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ------------ 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES . 3 - 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER-CHGS----,---1,791.00 165.90- 14080.03 '0.00 '710.'97''60.3' (--, OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2,591-00 2,007.97- 31,837.58- 0.00 34,428.58 1228.7 • 17 : 2 ---------- -5400 EQUIPMENT . • D., r ?, 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 319.00 . 0.00 : 318.44 0.00 0.56 99.8 . tc OBJECT SUBTOTAL 319.00 0.00 318.44 . 0.00 0.56 99.8 sf,, . _ 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 18,156.00 • 1,506.48' 12,033:69 0.00' -6,122.31 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 18,156.00 1,506.48 12,033.69 0.00 • 6,122.31 66.2 4316 TRAINING 250:00---------------17.41.- -182:00 300.00 1, 859. 48- 33,197.61- 250.00 0.00 98.00 0. 00 68.-00-- 72: 0.00 33,497.61 11065.8 0.00 152.00 39.2 6 7 a 6 10 18 6 21 2.1 11 1 r r 44 DIVISION -- TOTAL-- Qp- 1212 EMP BENEFITS -65:-458:00 3,020.02 - 5;'200.'34 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 544,529.00 51,099.51 372.742.99 OBJECT SUBTOTAL -544,529.00- 51.099.51-''"372.'742.'99 It. 34 r- 0. 00 171,786.01 ; 68.4 - - 0.00 - 68.4 FINANCE—FA454 TIME 10: 42: 38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND DIVISION TOTAL 1213 RETIREMENT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH --'- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT"(BY FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 PAGE— ...--- 0009------__ DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP 544, 529. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT - 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES-- ----- 4180 RETIREMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1214 PROSP EXP DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4322 UNCLASSIFIED 4397 2.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS ---- OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL -- 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4398 RESDL EQUITY TRSFR OUT 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT - OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 822, 159. 00 822, 159. 00 822, 159. 00 MGMT/SUPPORT 28, 190. 00 241, 620. 00- --- 213, 430. 00- 213, 430. 00— MGMT/SUPPORT 1, 056, 506. 00 6, 914. 00 1, 063, 420. 00 1, 063, 420. 00 ---- -- 3, 168, 623. 00 2101 POLICE DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY—.- 4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 4109 COURT TIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY POLICE 500, 237. 00 -1, 551, 397. 00 19, 920. 00 7, 500. 00 90, 000. 00 20, 500. 00 41, 547. 00 41, 547. 00 43, 482. 00 YTD EXPND. 51, 099. 51 372, 742. 99 70, 065. 62 70, 065. 62 70, 065. 62 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 0. 00 171, 786. 01 68. 4 495, 598. 21 495, 598. 21 495, 598. 21 0. 00 0. 00 326, 560. 79 60. 2 326, 560. 79 60. 2 0. 00 326, 560. 79 60. 2 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 —...._..--0.00 0. 00 1, 056, 505. 60 O. 00 v 6, 914. 00 0. 00 1, 063, 419. 60 0. 00 1, 063, 419. 60 176, 813. 68 ---- 2, 424, 960. 41 38, 562. 80 122, 434. 41 1, 480. 72 1, 886. 27 ---10, 497. 85 2, 029. 71 0. 00 ------ 2, 357. 16 - 482. 04 0. 00 28, 190. 00 0. 00 241, 620. 00- 0.00 — 213.430.00- 0. 0 0. 0 0. 00 --- — 213, 430. 00--------- - 0:0 — — -- 2 4 a 7 IZ 1.1 L 0. 00 0. 40 99. 9 0. 00 .._._.' - 0. 00 -.--..100. 0 .-.- 0. 00 0. 40 99. 9 0. 00 0. 40 99. 9 1, 511: 52---------742,-151:-07------- 76. 5' - 306, 626. 68 0. 00 193, 610. 32 61. 2 ----966, 324. 76 0. 00 -- 585, 072. 24 ----- - 62. 2 12, 039. 47 0. 00 7, 880. 53 60. 4 0. 00 13, 396. 79— 278. 6 0. 00 ------19, 891: 09 ---77. B 0. 00 7, 251.64 64. 6 0. 00 40, 544. 95 ` 2. 4 0. 00 ------- - 1, 348. 32---- 103. 2 -- • - --• - 0. 00 29, 067. 54 33. 1 20, 896. 79 70, 108. 91 13, 248. 36 1, 002. 05 42, 895. 32 14, 414. 46 C 1' r,. sr FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10: 42: 38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR --001 GENERAL FUND 2101 POLICE DEPT: POLICE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ----- - EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY -FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4114 POLICE RESERVES 13, 500. 00 ----- 4116 TRAINING TIME - - -- 0.00 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 9,318,•00 4118 FIELD TRAINING OFFICER 10,000.00 • 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 387, 593. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES --------------- 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT ------- OBJECT SUBTOTAL - -- 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER --- 4304 TELEPHONE • 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE - 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE --- 4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT • 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES --• -- OBJECT SUBTOTAL ---" 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL • 95, 452. 00 37, 757. 00 - 133, 209. 00 34, 231. 00 6, 525. 00 -'-' 3, 000. 00 8, 500. 00 17, 500. 00 "'---21, 000. 00 17, 500. 00 8, 500. 00 12, 736. 00 4, 000. 00 337, 510. 00 495, 037. 00 1, 537. 00 25, 000. 00 16. 125.00 42, 662. 00 143, 640. 00 143, 640. 00 3, 202, 141.00 3, 202, 141. 00 , PAGE0010 DATE 03/14/90 66. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 1, 003. 00 469. 76' 676. 52 37. 60 15, 649. 62 939:52 4, 968. 19 4, 014. 74 2, 795. 75 ' ----- 26, 832. 59 184, 713. 59 1, 499, 961. 46 4, 439. 60 0. 00 - ---- 4, 439. 60 -' 3, 201: 46-'- 3, 175. 14 2, 565. 17 150. 50 2, 238. 95 1, 642. 11 4, 066. 86 1, 269. 78 768. 93 285. 00 729. 86 2, 323. 30 28. 373. 90--- 5, 956. 84- 48, 837. 30 13. 722. 95 560: 25 612: '20 24, 744. 07 6, 773. 09 - "---. 2, 392. 32 4, 146. 05 15, 626. 57 - 11, 843. 10 14, 534. 35 N 3, 734. 96 1, 220.' 00 10, 973. 42 4, 118. 18 `----"204, 448.'30 323, 166. 61 0. 00 2, 149. 62- 0. 00 -" 939. 52- O. 00 4, 349. 81 0. 00 5, 985. 26 1.51. 54'----- ••11, 660: 87- 151. 54 887, 480. 00 115. 9 0. 0 53. 3 40. 1 69. 8 62. 8 0. 00 46, 614. 70 51. 1 0. 00 24, 034. 05 36. 3 0. 00 70, 648. 75 .-,. 46. 9 ------- 295: '25- 776. 29 636. 95 0. 00 --- 874. 28 0. 00 ----6.'400. 67 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 8, 983. 44 0.00 326.74 0. 00 0. 00 4, 720. 03 4, 622. 29 0. 00 6, 000. 00---- 12, 000. 00 0. 00 11, 046. 77 16, 622. 29 2, 306. 07 154, 994. 79 0. 00 2, 306. 07 154, 994. 79 0. 00 ---3,-592:'55 ---- 84. 0 8, 710. 64 74. 5 885. 04- 1.13. 5 -607.68'-___..._.79.'7 3, 479. 67 59. 0 1, 873. 43 89. 2 _..... _.- 2, 756. 23 _ 86. 8 2. 965. 65 83. 0 4, 765. 04 43. 9 -- 315. 00 ' - "-`79. 4 1, 762. 58 86. 1 118. 18- 102. 9 :.. -'_"133, 061: 70"'-'--" 60.5 - 162, 886. 95 67. 0 2 3 45 7 e IC 12 4 22 3_ 14 1, 210. 26 21. 2 15, 657. 68 37. 3 - 1, 875. 00--"'-.. 111. 6 - 14, 992. 94 64. 8 11,354.79- 107.9 11,354.79- _ 107..9 185, 502. 42 2. 051, 729. 88 25, 757. 27 1, 124, 653. 85 64. 8 185, 502. 42 2, 051, 729.. 88 25, 757. 27 1, 124, 653. 85 64. 8 L. rIwAmcs-p**54 2201TIME 10: 42: 38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR --- 001 GENERAL FUND FIRE .____- [1;1' r: - 5400 EQUIPMENT y-, DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 410e REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4108 FLSA OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY-OFF. 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4187 UNIFORMS --'- OBJECT ouororAL- 4200 CONTRACT cowrn*or ecnvInsa SERVICE/PRIVATE- OBJECT SUBTOTAL - *uoo MArEeIALo/ouppLIea,or*sn-'- 4uu* TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES MATERIALS -- 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND Luoso 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE -------'-- 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING CITY OF *snmoa*os*nH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) - FROM 02x01/90 TO 02/28,90 APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. • DATE 03/14/90 ua o%. OF YEAR COMPLETE • •�� * FIRE- 38, 674. 00 846, 306. 00 96, 000. 00 55, 000. 00 -xn.ar1.on 15, 871. 00 1o.o«o.00 1.080.562.00 ---' 20.349.00 - 20, 349. 00 *317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE - 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER c000 -OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES -'- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE pAYmswro'--- -' 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION DEPARTMENT 2401 ANIMAL CONTROL 3, 500. 00 3, 500. 00 3, 000. 00 3, 500. 00 650. 00 3, 800. 00 -98, 989. 00 126, 039. 00 2, 908. 00 70.273.76--- 9.770. 72 *o5*u5 - u.00 ---- n.uo z.o2e.oa 88, 029. 59 -1.o80.«o----- 000.le «24.oa -1.ee1.87'--- 211.51 53. 82 -__o.00 5.00 0. 00 -4.op9. 17- 1,519.23- 23, 849 r-1.5x9.2n- oo.o4p 25 -56e.970:48 65, 733. 57 o7 256. 15 00- 9, 889. 66 p.7nu.on 709; 399: 91 14,638.56 • ' ---uou----2eo �a --- -'.~ .�,^� -6an-'------ 0.00 30.266.43 6e.4 0.00 • 17.743.85 67.7 -'--o.no-----'4n.o71.00-----'n�o' ` 0.00 5,981.34 -~~• 102 .15 3,037. 05 � "� /a o , • ��� 0,00-------S'710:*4---- 71 v 2.o41 -z7 0. 00 1�---------'-- 2'559.e8 69.38 ' o�o�wu a��o 4, 559. «p-- 121 43 2, 870.74 75.1 �.p�o��� 0.00 �'5u"�«e-----65.m--- 547. 56 186.11 ~""'�n� am�« 585. 00 '_ar���oo oo�� 784. 65 0. 00 x�o 0. 00 3, 015. 35 20.6 -61, 393. 0. 00 1.r1��ar ' 9.6 ��'.'..'° ---'u.on---'--nr.opn.oa----62n--- 1.225.00 0. 00 1 142.-- --------------------------- 10, 157. 00 14 00 �"° 0. 00 82. 86 93.2 - -- an.000.ou'-- ��.««�0.oo 10, 157. 00 0.0 36, 382. 00 1*���5.00 _----1�4'n 00 15,- on --�uoo---'-1o.on5oo--- or 7 587. 14 0. 00 20, 794. 86 42 8 oo.8o1.00 47.r« �o a--- o�ae��oo 47. 74 60, 462. 0. 00 53, 418. *8 � . - -____ 60,462. 52 0.om 53,-*� --o ----- '---418. 53. 0 TOTAL 1.377,213.00 10e oeo. 50 ar*.smo.mo TOTAL 1.377 . z����oo � - ---�---'---' oa.o�a oo 874, 905. 20 DEPT:- ANIMAL REGULTN ^'-' PERSONAL rsnsowAL osnvIosa 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC �9,av1. 00-- «79.o7 501, 828. 73 _-_--__-_-_---__-_ 63.479. 07 501,1328. 73 5 4 - FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR ; 001- GENERAL FUND •• el. CITY. OF HERMOSA BEACH ----------- '-"'--- EXPENDITURE 'SUMMARY 'REPORT -'-' (BY FUND) PAGE- 0012 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 66.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION 2401 ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT: ANIMAL REGULTN MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE iC 7 c ,2 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1, 000. 00 0. 00 ------------ 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY -OFF ----"------'1; 770: 00 '---'--- 0. 00 . 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,770.00 0.00 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 1.000.00 81.60 -'----4187 UNIFORMS 471: 00' -_- -- 18.76' OBJECT SUBTOTAL 95, 302.00 7,079.04 1, 046. 57 .563.93 1,014.34 132.60 150:-08 59, 019. 43 0. 00 46. 57- 0. 00 • 17206:07- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 755. 66 867. 40 320:92 36, 282. 57 104. 6 31.'8 57. 3 13. 2 -31: 8 61. 9 4 n IJ 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES-' 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 1,800.00 335.05 1,297.10 �,� 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 5,000.00 397.84 • 3,613.89 2:_ OBJECT SUBTOTAL - b, 800:00 -----' -732. 89- ' 4,910:99 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE "" " " " -"-450:-00""- -'195: 30'-'- -525. 77 ri 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1, 800. 00 2. 00 1, 183. 27 - 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 700. 00 11. 52 463. 38 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES - -- -_`1;400. 00 "- ""-"'159. 17'__ --`979.'79' 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2, 500. 00 161. 56 1, 229. 49 4315 MEMBERSHIP 50.00 35.00 o 35.00 4316 TRAINING 350. 00' -.__....-_.... 0. 00..... - -_ - 0:'00 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 550.00 0.00 104.96 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 10, 164. 00 1, 266. 31- 6, 006. 80 OBJECT SUBTOTAL _ '"' ' "' - - 17, 964. 00 " '- `- 701:76- --10; 528:'46 24 5400 EQUIPMENT -.1-___ 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS -THAN $500-'-'- "' 1; 000. 00" '-"-' """-""" 0. 00 -0: 00 rf r 5403 VEHICLES 13, 000. 00 0. 00 13, 394. 89 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 14, 000. 00 0. 00 13, 394. 89 0. 00 0. 00 0: 00 0. 00 88. 55 0. 00 -0:00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 88. 55 - 502. 90 1, 386. 11 1,'889:'01 • 72. 0 • 72.2 '" 72.2 - 75:'77- 116:8.._--___ 528. 18 70. 6 --p• 236. 62 '420. 21-- 1, 270. 51 ' 66. 1 69:9* 49. 1 15.00 70.0 -._..350. 00 - -._.. O .0.._. 445. 04 19.0 4,157.20 59.0 77346 99 59:1----- 0. 00" '- - 1';'000: 00---- 0: 0" --- 0.00 394.89- 103.0 0. 00 605. 11 95. 6 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 680. 00 56. 15 449. 20 3 OBJECT SUBTOTAL'-____.__. ---680. 00-'---_..__. _._. 56: 15 ---------'---449. 20 - - ' DIVISION '-- TOTAL' -' " """'-' - "134; 746: 00 7, 166: 32 -_'_-88, 302: 97- r.,, 2701 CIVIL DEFENSE DEPT: DISASTER PREP ----"--'-' 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES-' - ""' "- o- r,. 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 24, 532.00 2, 083. 24 16, 777. 86 ri- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 134, 746. 00 7, 166. 32 88. 302. 97 0.00 230.80 66.0 ' 0:00 _' --230.80- 88. 55 _._..46,354. 48"--H---65. 5 88. 55 46, 354. 48 65. 5 0. 00 7, 754. 14 68. 3 • • • ---r'INANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 13 17 r r r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)- - FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 _ ' , DATE 03/14/90 2.,. 66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ' 3 1:1 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. -001 GENERAL FUND • -.-- - 2701 CIVIL DEFENSE DEPT: DISASTER PREP ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 491.00 0.00 --- • 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 491. 00 0. 00 4187 UNIFORMS 231.00 14. 58 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 25, 745. 00 2. 097. 82 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 111 -- OBJECT SUBTOTAL r e.„ 111,2 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1.1 0.00 0.00 491.00 0.0 0: 00 O. 00------------ 491. 00 O. 0 116. 64 0.00 114.36 50.4 16, 894. 50 - 0. 00 8. 850. 50 65. 6 4, 648. 00 0. 00 4, 648. 00 0. 00• 50. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.-00 0. 00- 00 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00 200. 00 2, 000. 00 2, 000. 00 3.600. 00 0. 00 1, 047. 08 3, 090. 00 103. 71- 1, 926. 60 7, 440. 00 1, 896. 29 4, 973. 68 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EGUIPMENT-MORE THAN $500 4, 500. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL -- - - - ----- 4, 500. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 4, 648. 00 4, 648. 00 0. 00 50. 00 • 0. 00 500. 00 0. 00 1, 800. 00- O. 00 • 2.552. 92 0. 00 1, 163. 40 0. 00 2, 466. 32 0. 00 0. 00 0:00 42,-333:00 3, 994:11-----21,-86a-ie DEPARTMENT TOTAL 42, 333. 00 3, 994. 11 21, 868. 18 3101 MEDIANS DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN --------- 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 1000. 0 29. 0 62. 3 66. 8 2, •••• 0. 00 :4, 500. 00 0. 0 0. 00 : - 0. 00 20;464. 82- -51. 6- 0. 00 20, 464. 82 51. 6 r al 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 44,697.00 3.940.66 30,314.77 0.00 14,382.23 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 -----. .-- -4110 VACATION/SICK PAY-OFF--------- 894.00 0.00 0. 0.00 894.00 • .1 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN C ."I 894.00 0.00 503.73 0.00 390.27 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 46, 785. 00 3, 940. 66 30, 818. 50 0. 00 15. 966. 50 ° I 10,1 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 47,630.00 3,150.00 22,050.00 0.00 25,580.00 , 46.2 k-------------- 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 1,260:00 24,00 0.00 0.00 1,260.00 0.0 • )1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 48, 890. 00 3, 15O00 22, 050. 00 0. 00 26, 840. 00 45. 1 --•••-•._-__ • 67.8 0.0 0. 0 56. 3 65.8 4300 MATER I ALS/SUPPL IES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES . 13, 764. 00 562. 45 5,513.54 0. 00 3, 250. 46 62. 9 i r' A CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 - - - -EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUNDY- PAGE 0014 TIME 10:42:38 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 FUND DIV ODJT DESCR 001- GENERAL FUND -`--- --- DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 3101 MEDIANS . DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 5,B00.00 - - -- - - 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES- --- - 900. 00 - 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 720.00 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 4,958.00 ----- OBJECT SUBTOTAL- --21(142.00'--'- ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE .3 765. 70 0. 00 2, 490. 89 207: 35 0. 00 . 267. 59- 2, 562. 48 -1, 072. 76 '--10, 794:26 5400 EQUIPMENT --• 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN -$500----------O. 00 ------------0:00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 DIVISION TOTAL 116, 817. 00 3103 ST MAINTENANCE - DEPT. --ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC--------142, 856. 00 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500.00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 2,848.00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN ' ' ' .. ' - ' - - 2, 848. 00' OBJECT SUBTOTAL 149,052.00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES- 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING 84, 877. 00 84, 877. 00 0. 00 • 3, 309. 11 0. 00 .-... -..__ .692. 65' 0. 00 720. 00 0. 00 2, 37.5. 52 0.00-- 10,347:74 0. 00 0. 00 8,163.42 63, 662. 76 O. 00 42. 9 23. 0 0. 0 52. 0 51. 0 0.00 0.0 53, 154.24 2, 54.4 11, 452. 55' -- -'88,'885."16 O. 00 153. 34 O. 00 0. 00 11, 452. 55 0. 00" 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 90, 632. 68 0. 00 '-53970:84 62:2------_-._ 346.66 30.6 2, 848. 00 0. 0 58, 419. 32 60. 8 5, 747. 11 42, 251. 43 O. 00 42, 625. 57 49. 7 5, 747. 11 42, 251.43 O. 00 42, 625. 57 49. 7 20, 000. 00 749. 41 7, 653. 06 -3, 500. 00 - -- --- 310. 34 ------' 2, 595. 58 13, 000. 00 498. 86 8, 422. 56 600.00 127. 50- 426. 50 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER 'CHCS ---------55, 281.00 . '-' -•-- - 7, 822. 88- - ----- 32, 335. 87 . OBJECT SUBTOTAL 92, 381. 00 6, 391. 77- 51, 433. 57 - 5400 EQUIPMENT - .-- ----..-.__,-..- 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 150. 00 0. 00 150. 00 0. 00 20, 844. 00 20, 844. 00 1,736.78 '1,736.78 1, 397. 84 10, 949. 10 45. 2 0. 00 --- -... _..... 904: 42..-.--74: 1 0. 00 4, 577. 44 64. 7 0. 00 1, 397. 84 149. 05 0. 00 149. 05 0. 00 • 15,631.02 -----15, 631:02 0. 00 173. 50 - 22, 945. 13'-'--'- 39, 549. 59 71. 0 58.4' 57. 1 0. 95 99. 3 0. 95 99. 3 5,212.98 74.9 :1 F I NANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 -GENERAL FUND • DIVISION TOTAL 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY !I CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) ----- FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 347, 304. 00 12, 544. 67 200, 097. 75 DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL -..--PAGE..._... - 0015- - DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 1, 397. 84 145, 808. 41 97, 216. 00 5, 772. 32 54, 766. 70 500.00 0.00 225.50 1, 927. 00 --- "----- 0. 00 - 13. 69 1, 927. 00 0. 00 1, 272. 46 101, 570. 00 5, 772. 32 56, 278. 35 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT"'- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES -- 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 24, 348. 00 978. 62 6, 500. 00 - - 1, 575. 56 30, 848. 00 2, 554. 18 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3, 811. 12 4, 850." 60 8, 661. 72 58. 0 42, 449. 30 56. 3 274".50 45. 1 1,-913. 31 0. 7 654. 54 66. 0 45, 291.65 55. 4 4, 348. 00 16, 188. 88 0. 00 "--'-- 1, 649. 40' 4, 348. 00 17, 838. 28 6, 000. 00 569. 49 3, 883. 28 38, 652. 00 3, 220. 45 17, 623. 15 1, 000. 00 '---- 173. 35 .__..._.__.__.........873. 83 600.00 250.51 150. 00 0. 00 250.00 --- ... 0.00 6, 326. 00 110. 08 52, 978. 00 4, 323. 88 815. 96 186. 25 O. 00 ... 4, 540. 15 27, 922. 62 • 0. 00 11, 285. 79 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 11, 285.79 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 1, 127. 00 O. 00 783. 24 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 -.------ 721.00 O. 00 '- - O. 00 5403 VEHICLES 2, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 5499 NON -CAP I TAL I ZED ASSETS O. 00 149. 62 11, 084. 96 OBJECT --••-----------3,848.00SUBTOTAL 648. 00 - 149. 62 _...._.--IL 868: 20 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS -11, 000.-00 -- - -- - - 841.29 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 11, 000. 00 841.29 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 4101 PLANNING 7, 571. 61 ----- 7,571.61 200, 244. 00 13, 641.29 112, 302. 50 664, 365:00 34, 349: 38 376,-063. 01 DEPT: PLANNING 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 0. 00 0.00' 0. 00 1, 800. 17 -1, 800.,17 0. 00.,17 33. 5 74. 6 42. 1 2, 116. 72 64. 7 9, 743. 06 74. 7 .___._--..--....._.126. 17----- 87:3 `---- 215. 96- 135. 9 36. 25- 124. 1 250:00-- O. 0 --- 1, 785. 85 71. 7 13, 769. 59 74. 0 0. 00 0. 00 17, 433. 96 343. 76 69. 4 721. 00 --------..... 0. 0 . .. 2, 000. 00 0. 0 12, 885. 13- 0. 0 9, 820. 37_ --- 355. 2 3, 428. 39 --" ---- 68. 8 3, 428. 39 70, 507. 54 68. B 64. 7 18, 831. BO ----269.-470-19 59.-4-- 185, 731.00 13, 388. 10 107, 795. 59 0. 00 77, 935. 41 58. 0 fP • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR --- 001 • GENERAL FUND • -- 4101 PLANNING DEPT: • 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME VACATION/SICK PAY OFF---•-- 4111-ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL -------- 71- trl I CITY ------•-CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT --•.(BY FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 PAGE- 0016 DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. PLANNING ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 3 6 u ,0 700. 00 ------3, 749. 00 3, 749. 00 4, 210. 00 0. 00 103. 14 0. 00 1, 999. 44 0. 00 1, 834. 62 -198, 139. 00 - -13, 388. 10 ----112, 013: 59 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE- 9,978.00 - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 9, 978. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES -------- 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING - 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 -- OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL ='4102 PLANNING COMM ' 1. 600. 00 15, 531. 00 200. 00 500. 00 623. 00 2, 000. 00 1, 450. 00 8,221.00 30, 125. 00 ------1, 084. 00 1, 084 00 239, 326. 00 - DEPT: --PLANNING 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE' -" ' -'5,'304: 00 --"` OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 304. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE - OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 4, 800. 00 454. 00 1, 200. 00 6, 454. 00 11, 758. 00 3, 760. 00 3, 760. 00 4, 01-1.00 4, 011. 00 0. 00 596. 86 14. 7 0. 00 --------3, 468. 20 •--- 7:-4 0. 00 1, 749. 56 53. 3 0. 00 2, 375. 38 43. 5 0. 00- 86, 125. 41- 56: 5- -0. 00-- - 5, 967.-00-----40.1 - 0. 00 5, 967. 00 40. 1 274. 02 1, 126. 74 2, 228. 85 9, 010. 32 0.00 81:85 0. ,00 195. 36 163. 00 458. 00 0. 00 .. .......__.... - 461: 50 365.80 365.80 454. 54- 5, 068. 14 2, 577. 13 -._...- .._._ 16, 767: 71 0. 00 0. 00 19, 725.23 1, 058. 25 1, 058. 25 -1, 083. 11- 1, 083. 1 1 133, 875. 41 -3,965.25 3,965.25 0.00 473.26 70.4 550. 00 5, 970. 68 61. 5 0.00 304.64 39.0 0. 00 165. 00 -0. 00 - .._.....-._..1, 538. 50 0.'00 1, 084. 20 0. 00 550. 00 73. 5 23. 0 -- 25. 2 3.152.86 61.6 0. 00 0. 89 99. 9 550. 00 104, 900. 59 56. 1 0. 00 1, 338. 75 74.7 "" 74. 7 178. 50 2, 492. 66 0. 00 2, 307. 34 51. 9 0.00 27.99 0.00 426.01 6. 1 365. 80 ..... __..._ ..365. 80...------ O. 00 ....--.._......_.._. 834. 20..._...__.._.. 30. 4 544. 30 2, 886. 45 0. 00 3, 567. 55 44. 7 1,602.55 6,851.70 0. 00 4, 906. 30 58. 2 17 111 -c • --- 001 GENERAL FUND r FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) - FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. DEPARTMENT TOTAL 251,084.00 21,327.78 DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4201 BUILDING 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME ---4110 VACATION/SICK PAY-OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT- 41, OBJECT SUBTOTAL ----------- 4300 MATER I ALS/SUPPL I ES/OTHER • 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS------ ( 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 17, . 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER- CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EGUIPMENT k•, r! .• r 1" 225, 767. 00 200. 00 4, 455. 00 4, 455. 00 234, 877. 00 47, 400. 00 700. 00 48, 100. 00 2, 500. 00 6, 500. 00 -1000.00 1, 000. 00 1, 200. 00 645. 00 3, 000. 00 1, 500. 00 15, 355. 00 32, 700. 00 5401 EGUIPMENT-LESS THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL ---- DIVISION TOTAL 4202 PUB WKS ADMIN 1, 200. 00 10, 000. 00 ----11,200.00 - - --- 326, 877. 00 DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN • 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY .4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 140, 727. 11 DATE 03/14/90 2 66. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 550. 00 109, 806. 89 56. 2 18, 037. 60 138, 634. 33 0. 00 14. 61 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 713. 07 18, 037. 60 140, 362. 01 0. 00 87, 132. 67 0. 00 185. 39 0. 00 4r455. 00 0. 00 2, 741. 93 0. 00 94, 514. 99 -----.-- 61.4 7.3 0.0 38.4 59.7 .1 1.5 18, 149. 61 28, 749. 73 0. 00 0. 00-- 18, 149. 61 28, 749. 73 186. 11 1, 434. 85 620. 19 4, 714. 95 0. 00 711: 00 38. 40 324. 18 0. 00 210.30 0. 00 250. 00 288. 00 1. 564. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 139. 27- 9, 354. 16 6. 57- 18, 563. 44 0. 00 864. 68 0. 00 0. 00 - - - 0. 00 864. 68 11,096.03 7,554.24 84.0 11,943.33 7,406.94 84.6 0. 00 1, 065. 15 57. 3 2:: • 120. 75 1, 664. 30 74. 3 ., 0. 00 ------------ 289:0Q'-- 71. 1 -------- : 0. 00 675. 82 32. 4 - - . , 0.00 989. 70 17. 5 - 0. 00 395. 00 38. 7 ... 99. 00 1, 337. 00 55.4." .• 0. 00 1, 500. 00 0. 0 0. 00 -------- 6, 000. 84 60. 9 219. 75 13, 916. 81 57. 4 208. 16 127. 16 89. 4 0. 00 10, 000. 00 0. 0 208. 16 - 36, 180. 64 188, 539. 86- --12, 371. 24 125,965.90 61. 4 155, 170. 00 13, 507. 89 102, 756. 18 0. 00 52, 413. 82 66. 2 - - - 2, 988. 00 O. 00 - O. 00 0.00 -------- 2, 988. 00- ----- 0. 0 - 2, 988. 00 0. 00 1, 756. 91 0. 00 1, 231. 09 58. 7 5, 000. 00 0. 00 1, 891. 44 0. 00 3, 108. 56 37. 8 7, 000. 00 455. 03 - 3, 926. 16 0. 00 ----- 3, 073. 84 ---- -- -- 56. 0 -- 173, 146. 00 13, 962. 92 110. 330. 69 0. 00 62, 315. 31 63. 7 1 ♦ ' • ; FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 1, a - - FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 4202 PUB WKS ADMIN 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH _--'-----------EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT.--(BY-FUND> FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 ' APPROPRIATION DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4,600.00 - 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT ---- 5,000. OBJECT SUBTOTAL 9, 600. 00 9,600.00 - --•------•--4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE "- - - - r'' S, 200. 00 683. 66 3, 172. 76 - -- 7 1 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 9, 500. 00 1, 313. 57 271. 68 1, 731. 99 66. 6 1 - -- 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS- - 6, 206. 70 71, 68 3, 221. 62 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 0. 00 9. 33 -5 1, 112. 85' 66. 0 • MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 166. 27 166. 27 PAGE- ---0018 DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 1,446.89 1,446.89 z 3 n -1 bJ 7 ,O. ,2• 0. 00 3, 153. 11 31. 4 -. O. 00 5,'000. 00_'----•- O: O -----•- 0. 00 8, 153. 11 15. 0 800. 00 90. 94 627. 71 1 112 85 .,i 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 800.00 0.00 172.29 78.4 4315 MEMBERSHIP 7. 00 420, 44 0. 00 379. 56 52. 5 4316 TRAINING 2, 900. 00 C.:: 319. 50 433.50 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 0. 00 2, 466. 50 14. 9 - 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 1, 400. 00- O. 00 O. 00 ' -43, 233. 00 ' O. 00 1, 400. 00- 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 604. 9 -27; 290. 70' O. 00----- `` i 61, 683. 00 1, 819. 49 21, 375. 41 ""-- 63.1 -- e- 39, 940: 66 366. 93 21, 375. 41 65. 3 ""� --'-'- 5400 EQUIPMENT r;:-1 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 1, 550.00 298.74 '='�''� OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN k$500 400.00 p 00 i ' ---- ._. --.1, 950. 00 • ----------- . 298. 74 +; 5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS ;-----------"'--- ' 5602 IMPRVMTS OTHER THN DLDGS'------1;600: 00 "' - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00' 1, 600. 00 O. 00 e DIVISION TOTAL 247, 979.00 DEPT:--- _-CONST/ENGIN/ENF -4204 BLDG MAINT 838.74 0.00 711.26 0. 00 50. 1 0. 00 . 400. 00 0. 0 838:74--------.--.-.-.o. 00 - -1 T 111'. 26------- 43. 0 0. 00 0. 00 16, 247. 42 152, 556. 98 1, 600. 00 0. 0 366. 93 95, 055. 09 61. 6 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES - - 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC-----------• 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 145,015. 0012, 237. 62 ---------•"94; 727. 26------------ 2, 000. 00 137. 04 O: 00 "' _ - 50, 287.'74 ' 65. 3 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 2, 892. 00 795. 97 0. 00 1, 204. 03 39. 7 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN O. UO O. 00 0. 00 ._ ..-..._....._._.. _---2, 892. 00 .._....__.._-.._.....- 2, 892. 00 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 0. 00 -- 2, 408. 69 -• -• 0. 0 O. 00 O. 00 - 483. 2.. 483. 31 --..;...__-83. 2 4187 UNIFORMS O. O0 2, 317. 50 O. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 300. 00 16. 68 133. 44 2, 316. 56- 4. 4 O. 00 "-"'-"-----153, 099, 00 '-~--_------ 12, 391. 34 •-'-`-•--100, 382: 86 166. 56 44. 4 O. 00•_._.._..__....32, 716. 14 '- •---- 65. 5 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE ----- 17, 860. 00'--- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 538. 73' '~ ---10.-215:-00 17, 860. 00 1, 538. 73 7, 645. 00 -.._. __57 1 10, 215. 00 ' 0. 00 7, 645. 00 57. 1 ,2, ;,1. ,f r1 6.4 2,1 I '71 • • • r! FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10: 42: 38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR -001 GENERAL FUND 4204 BLDG MAINT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUNDY--------- FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE ---- 4316 TRAINING 4321 BUILDING SAFETY/SECURITY 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS - OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 80, 000. 00 45, 000. 00 1, 000. 00 1, 200. 00 500. 00 9, 500. 00 22, 057. 00 ---159, 257. 00 PAGE .. .. 0019 DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY ExP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE c 8, 062. 54 52, 986. 48 4, 585. 78 ------ 23, 301.92 45. 01 4. 43 0. 00 - 225. 11 1, 981. 78- 10, 941. 09 475.00 - - 0:00 475. 00 0. 00 330, 691. 00 24, 871. 16 --4205 EQUIP SERVICE -DEPT:---CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC------- •94, Ot. 00 - 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,150.00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 2,017.00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN -- 2, 017. 00 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 6,300.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 105,515.00 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4,700.00 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES ---------- 1, 500. 00 - 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 3,000.00 4316 TRAINING 200.00 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS------- 7, 288. 00 -- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 16, 688. 00 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 555. 00 1, 445. 00 5, 800. 00 9, 800. 00 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 5,016.00 -- 7, 788. 25 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 .. 0. 00 7, 788. 25 523. 52 38. 64 222. 90 0. 00 462. 15 67. 64 0. 00 1, 963. 44 13, 313. 53 92, 095: 16 234: 25 - 234. 25 0. 00 27, 013. 52 66. 2 1, 506. 68 -- 20, 191:40 55. 1 0.00 537: 85 46.2 0. 00 1, 132. 36 5. 6 0. 00 --------- 500. 00 0. 0 104. 48 7, 432. 08 21. 7 0. 00 8, 743. 47 60. 3 -1, 611. 16 ---- ---65, 550. 68 ----- 58. 8--- 0. 00- _._._.--. 240.75 0. 00 240. 75 202, 927.27 1,611.16 - 60, 520. 21 1, 224. 82 0. 00 736. 05 6, 291. 87 --- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 68, 772. 95 0. 00 2, 999. 08 505. 68 2, 000. 18 0. 00 --_ 330. 06- . - - --• 4, 520. 55 455. 00 10, 025. 49 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 267. 36 0. 00 5, 915.61- 7, 182. 97 0. 00 392. 15 558. 36 0. 00 0. 00 950. 51 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 49:3- ------- 49. 9:3..--_-- 49. 3 126, 152.57 61.8 74. 82- 106. 5 2, 017. 00 0. 0 1, 280. 95 -- - 36. 4 8. 13 99. 8 36, 742. 05 65. 1 1, 700. 92 63. 8 602. 17 .... .,. 59. 8 441.46 85. 2 200. 00 0. 0 2, 767. 45 - -- ---- 62. 0 5, 712. 00 65. 7 1, 287. 64 49. 6 1, 445. 00 0. 0 `115.61---'-101.9 - 2, 617. 03 73. 2 417. 96 3, 761.64 0. 00 1, 254. 36 74. 9 a • (`' ---001-GENERAL FUND 6900 LEASE OBJECT FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR ---- '4601 PAYMENTS SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT '(BY FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 PAGE- `v 0020' DATE 03/14/90 66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 5, 016. 00 417.96 137, 019. 00 1, 042, 566. 00 COMM RESOURCES ' -'."-"""'--DEPT:-'-'-COMM PROMOTION 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES -- -4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC-"'-'" 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF --------'--- 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN _- -- '"-- 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3,761.64 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE iG 0. 00 8, 661.21 85, 960. 43 89, 743. 05 633, 767. 16 1,254.36 74.9 ., +11 950. 51 46, 325. 44 15. 299. 84 393, 499. 00 -161;997. 00 -'-- "- ----10, 794. 00 ' --'-"107,-360: 94 2, 000. 00 575. 87 714. 71 12, 760. 00 0. 00 15, 398. 44 -- -` 5, 809. 00 _.. _ .. _..__..163. 31 " __...__ 4, 201.99 55, 000. 00 5, 799. 27 35, 316. 44 237, 566. 00 17, 332. 45 162, 992. 52 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL .- 7111 7.6 >> r fj• aZ 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER --- 4302 ADVERTISING -'""...... 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS -------- 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER`CHOS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 85, 078. 00 85, 078. 00 10; 500. 00 4, 000. 00 8,613. 00 --- 13, 890. 00 350. 00 100. 00 -- - -- 625. 00 1, 000. 00 1, 600. 00 ------15, 992. 00 56, 670. 00 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL nc -----------6900 LEASE PAYMENTS .... Ai, f". _c 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS o_. OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 000. 00 2, 500. 00 8, 577. 00 16, 077. 00 2. 300. 00 2, 300. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 397, 691.00 5, 762. 00 57, 800. 26 5, 762. 00 -57, 800: 26 2; 000: 00 335. 98 669. 86 153. 49 18. 34 0. 00 520. 00 0. 00 1, 015. 54 1, 015. 54 293. 03- "----"--10, 073. 51 4, 420. 18 26, 715. 40 k. 66.1 62. 2 0. 00 --------- 54,`636: 06----"66: 2 0. 00 1, 285. 29 35. 7 0. 00 2, 638. 44- 120. 6 0. 00 _... _..__.._ 1, 607. 01 --__._._.._.72: 3 0. 00 19, 683. 56 64. 2 0. 00 74, 573. 48 68. 6 0..00 27, 277. 74 67. 9 0. 00 `"`"_"`_` 27;'277. 74 67:9 6,128: 97' -' 'O. 00 2, 486. 55 0. 00 2, 758. 45 0. 00 2, 674. 64 ""- 1. 377. 49 226. 02 0. 00 30. 23 0. 00 -' 540. 00 0. 00 781. 49 0. 00 0. 00 0:00 1, 377. 49 1,971.60 0. 00 8, 577. 36 10, 548. 96 4, 041.43 181.00 0. 00 0. 00 8, 577: 36 0. 00 12, 618. 79 181.00 189. 65 1, 515. 00 189.65 1.515.00 38, 253. 24 . 1, 513. 45 62. 1 5, 854. 55 32. 0 837. 87.'._--"' 29. 1 123.98 64.5 69. 77 30. 2 85. 00 86. 4 218. 51 78. 1 584. 46 63. 4 918:-49---- 62. 9 28, 577. 11 49. 5 777. 57 84. 4 2, 500. 00 0. 0 3, 277. 21 79. 6 0.00 785.00 65.8 0.00 785.00 65.8 261, 641. 97 1,558.49 134, 490. 54 66. 1 • -- FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 3 FUND DIV OBJT r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)' FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DESCR • APPROPRIATION - 001 GENERAL FUND • 6101 PARKS DEPARTMENT TOTAL 397, 691.00 DEPT: PARKS/REC ------4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME -"--" 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY-OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 72, 632. 00 500. 00 -"' 1, 453. 00 1, 453. 00 76, 038. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT' OBJECT SUBTOTAL ---'----'4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4304 TELEPHONE -4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 6, 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS - .. OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN"$500---- 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS OBJECT SUBTOTAL --- 157, 606. 00 12, 600. 00 170, 206. 00 39, 036. 00 125. 00 11, 600. 00 700. 00 1, 000. 00 500. 00 500. 00 8, 902. 00 -61, 363. 00 ---' -.. 200: 00 1, 200. 00 0. 00 400. 00 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL_ 8141 CIP 89-141 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE -4, 200:00 4, 200. 00 PAGE -.'-..-'---0021 DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 38, 253. 24 261, 641. 97 1, 558. 49 134, 490. 54 66. 1 5,921.45 45, 337. 85 0. 00 22. 64 0.00 -- -... 0.00 0. 00 699. 71 5, 921. 45 46, 060. 20 0. 00 27, 294. 15 62. 4 0.00 477.36 4.5 0. 00 - -- 1, 453, 00_.----' O. 0 -` 0.00 753.29 48. 1 0. 00 29, 977. 80 60. 5 10, 025. 62 81, 097. 34 0. 00 ... -_.__. 0:' 00 10, 025. 62 81, 097. 34 3, 386. 77 31, 757. 60 34. 99 219. 27 1, 288. 83 ' --------6, 393. 83 81. 73 419. 71 302.06 441.02 0. 00 - - 488. 00 127. 50- 426. 50 489. 90- 5, 487. 94 4, 476. 98 -45, 633. 87 0. 00 223. 44 0. 00 0. 00 750.88 750.88 -'"" 750. 88 - 974: 32 0. 00 76, 508. 66 0. 00 -"-'- ---` 12, 600 00 0. 00 89, 108. 66 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 558.98 44. 1 0. 00 0.00 73. 50 85.3 0. 00 3, 414. 06 61. 6 0. 00 .._ ---15; 729. 13 -' --- - ---74.3 -.._._.-.. 6, 278. 40 94. 27- 5, 206:17' 280. 29 51. 4 47. 6 83. 4 175. 4 55. 1 59. 9 -' 0. 00 -- 0. 00 289. 29 289. 29 1, 200. 00 0. 0 1, 040. 17- 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 ---._...._...__ 0. 00 - - - 4, 200. 00 - 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 200. 00 313, 207. 00 21, 174. 93 173, 765. 73 289. 29 - 313, 207.'00-----21,-174.'93 -------173;"765-.--73 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 25, 000. 00 0. 0 - 0. 0 139, 151.98 55. 5 289: 29----- 139,-151798 - 55:5 ' 85. 50 85. 50 0. 00 24, 914. 50 0. 3 3 4 5 o 7 9 3, • • r1.. '-rzwAwos-FA*o« ________ FUND DIV OBJT DESCR --- 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ---� '--'--- --'--sxpswozroes SUMMARY REPORT -(BY FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. PAGE-----00222--- oATs 03/14,90 66. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 25.000.00 oo. 50 85. 50 8142 SIDEWALK REPAIR DEPT: STREET/SAFETY --------4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ----- 0.00 24,914.50 0.o �� ' 0. 00 24, 914. 30 o.o 4201 CONTRACT osnvIns/peIvArE 328.064.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 328, 064. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL o28.064. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 328, 064. 00 0. 0 - _ -' __-_�__-___ _� • 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE �- -' SUPPLIES O.- -- -- 226. 36 O. ~~ 226. 36- "." �`SUBTOTAL r--:, _ e...-,, '4300 mArsnzALo/ouppLIss/oT*sn |�\ s/------ '-- 4309 MAINTENANCE mArsnIm-e'-----------o.00----- 1'•1om.oe-------'�1,'oo1�o2-- --o.00------I.001.-52--�---o.'o--�--�-- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 1.145.3e 1.o21. 52 0. 00 1, 321. 52- o.o = | ^.3' ' |?:.-_---•-• _- __--".�^ ,," ��-.�^ -_.-.---'.-.--_...---. '.'1- c, , '" " " `" ` �. = ' DIVISION TOTAL---'--------000.oa4,00--'---�--'-a.ou' . oa-- �--o.om-----o27.ao7:a4----- oro--_----� )- o14a CIP 89-146 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY . • . 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE eo.000.00 0. 00 0. 00 e.poo.00 17.100.00 xo. 5 ---------' OBJECT SUBTOTAL -- �-'---- 20, 000. o.uo----- ---'o.00-------a.poo.00-------1r.'1uu. oo------14.o------- j'il 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES--------- 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE------70,468:00- =OBJECT SUBTOTAL 70,468 .00 •^ �-- - e177 r LC, , -' --------- ' o.on---------o.00 0. 0 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 70.468.00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 70.468.00 n.o CIP 87-177 DEPT: -STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE --- 40, 000. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 40.000.00 o. 00 0:00 ----------- o. 00---40.000. 00'---0.0 • I FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10: 42: 38 FUND DIV ODJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (13Y FUND)-" ""' PAGE --'-'-'- 0023 - FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 66. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X 0. 00 0. 00 40, 000. 00 0. 0 1, 633. 38 2, 900. 00 478, 998. 62 0. 9 DIVISION TOTAL 40, 000. 00 0. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 483, 532. 00 1, 230. 88 - 8601 CIP 86-601 DEPT:- BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE-"-- ' 4, 000. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 8604 CIP 86-604 0. 00 --- 0. 00 4, 000. 00 0. 00 DEPT:- BLDGS'& GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE ----------19, 000. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 19, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL - 8606 CIP 87-606 1, 071-:'24 1,071.24 1, 071. 24 1, 000:-00--- -"-1;'928.- 76 1, 000. 00 1, 928, 76 1, 000. 00 31 7- 51. 7 1, 928. 76 51. 7 -..0. 00' - 0: 00 0. 00 • 0. 00 19, 000. 00 0. 00 DEPT:---BLDGS & GROUNDS - -- 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00"- ------19, 000. 00"- - 0. 0 0. 00 19, 000. 00 _ 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 8; 550. 00 _._.._..-.__-. 0. 00 17. 50 8, 550. 00 0. 00 17. 50 DIVISION TOTAL 8, 550. 00 8609 CIP 89-609 -- DEPT:-- BLDGS &- GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE-----30, 000.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 30, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 30, 000. 00 8610 CIP B8-610 DEPT:--- DLDGS & GROUNDS . 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - - 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7, 000. 00 7, 000. 00 19, 000. 00 0. 0 74. 73-- -- 8x457. 77 --- - 1. 0 ---- 74. 73 8, 457. 77 1. 0 0. 00 17. 50 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 74. 73 -0:00 0. 00 8, 457. 77 1.0 0. 00........._.. --- 30, 000. 00 -------- O. 0 ..... 0. 00 30, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 30, 000. 00 0. 0 0.00 - ---2,-485:00 0. 00 2, 485. 00 0. 00-----:----4, 515: 00 ---- -35. 5 0. 00 4, 515. 00 35. 5 1 F I NANCE-FA454 •2 TIME 10:42:38 r , r --------- CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE-- 0024 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 66. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP. YTD EXPND. ---••001 -GENERAL FUND • - - ••• - • • DIVISION TOTAL 7, 000. 00 0. 00 8612 CIP 88-612 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS ----------4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SER V I CE /PR I VATE 16, 700. 00 O. 00 r • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 16, 700. 00 O. 00 r 2, 485. 00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 4, 515. 00 35. 5 O. 00 .:. 0. 00 16, 700. 00 0. 00 16, 700. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 16, 700. 00 0. 00 0. 00 • 8613 CIP 89-613 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 0 1 , • -4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 0. 0 0. 0 0. 00 16, 700. 00 0. 0 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 8, 000. 00 O. 00 230. 50 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 8, 000. 00 O. 00 230. 50 DIVISION TOTAL 8, 000. 00 0. 00 230. 50 8614 CIP 88-614 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS -4200 -CONTRACT SERVICES 4 ,.. O. 00 7, 769. 50 2. 8 ... .- O. 00 7, 769. 50 2. 8 .._ 0. 00 7, 769. 50 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 136, 074. 00 0. 00 96, 643. 89 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 136, 074. 00 0. 00 96, 643. 89 2. 8 • • . 0. 00 39, 430. 11 71. 0 0. 00 39, 430. 11 71. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 136, 074. 00 O. 00 96, 643. 89 O. 00 39.43011 71. 0 • 8615 CIP 89-615 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 10,000.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 10, 000. 00 O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 10, 000. 00 0. 0 . _ DIVISION TOTAL 10, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 10, 000. 00 0.0 . • _ . ________ .- ---- . - DEPARTMENT TOTAL 239, 324. 00 O. 00 100, 448. 13 1, 074. 73 137, 801. 14 ' 42. 4 - 8703 CIP 89-703 DEPT:---- OTHER 'PROJECTS ' 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE -- 5, 000: 00' - - O. 00 0:*00 0. 00 5, 000. 00 O. 0 - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 5, 000. 00 O. 0 . '` 412 p --001 LIGHTING DISTRICT r pxwAwcs-FA45* TIME 10:42:38 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY ruwo,--'------ '-- -' FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION 8703 CIP 89-703 DEPT: OTHER PROJECTS - `, DIVISION TOTAL :x000 mo ' r -_'- /~.^ DEPARTMENT TOTAL 5.000.00 ['� .z------- -'--' FUND -TOTAL -11.731.000.00 -- r--.` /' •'` • ^-[ 1.1` f_� �17,7 /-� ' MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. DATE 03/14/90 66.0z OF YEAR COMPLETE - ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE z , " ° 0. 00 n.ono.00 o.o 0. 00 0. 00 707,454.47 7,350,828.63 0. 00 5, 000. 00 0. 0 " = mr e4, .^� = = / 40 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ---FINANCE-FA454 - -EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT -(BY-FUND) 41! TIME 10:42:38 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. .• -• • •• -• PAGE 0026. DATE 03/14/90 66. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ; r -L 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 105 -LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER . - 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 12, 275. 00 1, 022. 92 8, 183. 36 ,.. - -.-----------. OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 12, 275. 00 -1, 022. 92 • -8, 183: 36 !.. r.., t• . ------------------- DIVISION --TOTAL- 12, 275:-00- -1; 022. 92 - 8;-183736 r- ... • DEPARTMENT TOTAL 12, 275. 00 1, 022. 92 8, 183. 36 _ - 2601 STREET L I GHT ING DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES • 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1E, 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF - t 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY . 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 4, 091. 64 0. 00 -4. 091. 64 0. 00 66. 6 4, 09t-64 -66. 6 0. 00 4, 091. 64 66. 6 77, 099. 00 6, 018. 24 46, 251. 55 1, 000. 00 0. 00 11.30 1, 533. 00 O. 00 • 0: 00 1, 533. 00 0. 00 1, 494. 26 4, 000. 00 0. 00 915. 00 9, 699: 00 • 89. 57- 6,.118. 45 8, 932. 00 940. 00 6, 608. 02 103, 796. 00 7, 047. 81 61, 398. 58 • J1 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/OOVT 9, 350. 00-- -1, 575. 56 850.58 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 14, 300. 00 0. 00 6, 000. 00 r4:111 1:1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 23, 650. 00 1, 575. 56 10, 850. 58 4303 UTILITIES 170, 000. 00 15, 068. 06 102, 663. 08 4304 TELEPHONE 150.00 20.63 175. 15 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS . 10, 200. 00 - 277. 07 -- ---- 5; 766: 63 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 2, 500. 00 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 9, 500. 00 4316 TRAINING 500.00 • , 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 8, 188. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 201. 038. 00 • 5400 EQUIPMENT 5403 VEHICLES 2, 000. DIVISION - TOTAL -330, 484. 1\ 3 7 11 0 14 13 I0 '7 11. 21 0. 00 30, 847. 45 59. 9 0. 00 988. 70 1. 1 0. 00 533. 00 0. 0 0.00 38. 74 97. 4 0. 00 3, 085. 00 22. 8 0. 00 3; 580. 55 63. 0 0. 00 2, 323. 98 73. 9 0. 00 42,397.42 59. 1 0. 00 0. 00' 0.00 8, 300. 00 4.499.42 12, 799. 42 , 41. 9 45. 8 LS; • 0. 00 67, 336. 92 60. 3 0.00 25. 15- 116.7 468. 60. --3,-964. 77 . 61.-1 135. 66 2, 068. 98 0. 00 431. 02 82. 7 15. 37 1, 513. 55 0. 00 7, 986. 45 15.9 .. 0.00 50.00-O. 00 450. 00 10. 0 - • .., 268. 58- 5, 113. 92 0. 00 3, 074. 08 62. 4 15, 248. 21 117, 351. 31 468. 60 83, 218. 09 58. 6 00 0. 00 0. 00 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 2, 000. 00 0. 0 00 - 23, 871. 58 189, 600..47-- 60 '140, 414. 93........57•5 " DEPARTMENT TOTAL 330, 484. 00 23, 871. 58 189, 600. 47 468. 60 140, 414. 93 57. 5 o� --FINANCE-rA454 TIME 10:*2:38 , ` '--------'- ° |` FUND DIV OBJT DESCR --105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND 8e01 CIP 85-201 r" r'` • •'" CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH •- -- ' EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (13Y ruwo)-----� FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 30.o00. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 30, 000. 00 ., y.12. r • ~� - -'-pAGs' 0027---~---'r` ?;. DATE 03/14r90 2 - 66oz OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. "i ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE "z 0.00 DIVISION- TOTAL- -------------3o.000,00 -------'--o,ao 8202 CIP 85-202 DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 2.000.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 000. 00 f - 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER *309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 'owoo EQUIPMENT 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS OBJECT SUBTOTAL . -- r ozvIsIom TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 on.000.00 o.o - '" °�� |�� uoo'----oo.oum 00----0.0- '=~l `" 0. 00-- oo,-0uo':oo 0. 0 0. 00 825. 00 0. 00 0.00---------814794 0. 00 0. 00- 0. 00 0. 00 340. 80 0. 00 0. 00 340. 80 2, 000 00 0. 00 1, 980. 74 32, 000 00 0. 00 1, 980. 74 374.759.00 24.e94.50- 199. 764. 57 1'175.00 1, 175.-00 814:94- o1*9*- 41.2 w1.2 w, o 0. 0 0. 00 340 80- 0. 0 0. 00 30, 019. 26 a.I 468. 60 174.'525: 83 ' 1 FINANCE-FA454 (' TIME 10:42:38 : u i FUND DIV OBJT DESCR ---•110 PARKING FUND r u 1299'BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: f`t 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL ---"--- DIVISION -TOTAL ' r' 23 ze 33 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3301 VEH PKG DIST DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES --- _.--•-- 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 286. 80 O 6, 296. 79 O. 00 10, 370. 21 37, 7 -- 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN • O. 00 751. 89 O. 00 439. 89- 240. 9 4180 RETIREMENT - -- O.00 - -. O. 00' 0: 00" --312. 00 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS O. 00 930. 87 '' p 00 O. 0 19. 59 388. 16 3, 075. 13 23. 2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 .357. 84 52.0 - - - 306. 39 ----- 8; 367: 71 ' O. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES -------13:675: "29' 37; q ---- - 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE--------44;361-00- - - OBJECT SUBTOTAL3, 457: 63- -27-219741 44, 361.00 3, 457. 63 27, 219. 41 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY -REPORT. -•(DY' -FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION MGMT/SUPPORT 1, 388, 090. 00 1, 388, 090. 00 PAGE 0028 DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE • X 117, 434. 67 918, 351. 36 117, 434 0. 00 469, 738. 64 66. 1 : 67 918, 351. 36 0. 00 - 469, 738. 64 ---_- 66:1 - - - -1i388,.090. 00 - - --117; 434:67 918,-351-736 000------469 T738: 1, 388, 090. 00 117, 434. 67 918, 351.36 �.-...._ ....._._.......- _. 0. 00 469, 738. 64 66. 1 PKG FACILITIES --_.-. - -- - - - - 16, 667. 00 312. 00 312. 00 4, 006. 00 746. 00 22; 043. 00 ---"---- 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER•-- 4304 TELEPHONE 250.00 "--' - - ._. 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00 70.00 0.00 180.00 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -----------1,300.00 21. 12 - 137.98 28.0 0. 00 000. 00 .:-...-_..-.--..----,_- 0:00----- ---...978. 74 ' 162. 02 45. 9 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS843.00- -'0.00 99. 58- 499. 97 34 . 0326-------97. 8 - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 393. 00 O. 00 343. 03 59. 3 68. 46- 1, 686. 69 O. 00 706. 31 70. 4 5400 EQUIPMENT ---_.-__-_- 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 0.00 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 0.00 10.00 - 0.00 __ 0.00 10.00- 0.0 O: 00 :., 5420 DEPRECIATION/EQUIP&VEH 350.00 ----0.00- -'--489.37 0.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 350.00 0.00 10.00 350.00 0.O 489. 37 - - --- 149. 37- 142. 6 5600 DUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS - -- ----------•----. _........__._ 5620 DEPRECIATION/BLDGS&IMPRV 2,700.00 - OBJECT SUBTOTAL. .- .--_. • O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 _ ---------- 2, 700. 00 .._. _. •0:00 -177141759---617-3 - 0. 00 17, 141. 59 61.3 • DIVISION 3302 PARKING ENF DEPT: PKG FACILITIES 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 523, 749. 00 --" O. 00 . 3, 695.-56' --37; 283: 81- 0. 00 2, 700. 00 2, 700. 00 0. 0 0. 0 ---489. 37---------34,-073: 82---52: 5 .... .... ...... 40, 693_06 340, 571. 15 0. 00 _`183, 177.85 65. 0 • , -"FINANCE-FA454 :: TIME 10: 42: 38 r , FUND DIV OBJT DESCR ---110-PARKING FUND 2f CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY -FUND) - FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 PAGE ' ' 0029 __ DATE 03/14/90 66. 07, OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 3302 PARKING ENF DEPT: PKG FACILITIES 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 12, 000. 00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY- OFF--------- 11, 065. 00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 11,065.00 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 49,160.00 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL----------- 5, 350. 00 4180 RETIREMENT 67, 120. 00 4187 UNIFORMS 8,000.00 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS------ --------- 80, 752. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 768,261.00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - - - 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE I 11,000.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 11, 000. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 3, 000. 00 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES - 45, 000. 00 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 3,378.00 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 15,000.00 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES - - -- 8, 000. 00 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 12, 000. 00 4315 MEMBERSHIP 300.00 4316 TRAINING -- ----------- 2, 000. 0°- 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 1, 000. 00 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 41,975.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL - - 131,653:00 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 ----------'- 1, 589: 00 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 53,500.00 5420 DEPRECIATION/EQUIPY,VEH 20,000.00 5499 NON -CAP I TAL I ZED ASSETS ------ ----- 30, 100. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 105.189.00 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS -- -------------------- 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3, 500. 00 3, 500. 00 1, 019, 603. 00 1, 091, 450. 00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 182. 16 5, 211. 41 0. 00 _..__..._._. 3, 701: 28 107. 08 4, 129. 93 2, 484. 08 26, 873. 45 346. 67 - - - 2, 988. 47 238. 37 36, 680. 74 173. 32 2, 080. 25 - 4, 775. 38 - -- 36, 248. 04 49, 000. 12 458, 484. 72 0. 00 6, 788. 59 43. 4 0. 00 -- ' 7, 363. 72 - 33.4 -- 0. 00 6, 935. 07 37. 3 0. 00 22, 286. 55 54. 6 0. 00 --- 2, 361: 53 33.8 0. 00 30. 439. 26 54. 6 0. 00 5, 919. 75 26. 0 0. 00' -- -' 44, 503. 96 44. 8 0. 00 309, 776. 28 59. 6 0. 00 2. 144. 96 0. 00 2, 144. 86 572. 82 2, 524. 01 5, 182. 74 -' ----19, 580: 34 305. 50 2, 444. 00 11.3. 58 7,592.70 460. 05 - 4, 909. 76 506. 44 5, 046. 51 0. 00 200. 00 0. 00 1, 007: 86 0. 00 428. 00 3, 503. 62- 25, 445. 18 3, 637. 51 ' - 69, 186. 36 0. 00 ---- -- 611769 0. 00 1, 651.39 0. 00 0. 00 29, 188. 87 ------•-- 29,-188. 87 29, 188. 87 31. 451. 95 0. 00 8. 855. 14 19. 4 0. 00 8, 855. 14 19. 4 0.00 475.99 84. 1 4. 202. 78 21, 208. 88 - 52. 8 0.00 934.00 72.3 2. 833. 02 4. 574. 28 69. 5 19. 97 - -- 3, 070. 27'------61. 6 0. 00 6, 953. 49 42. 0 0. 00 100. 00 66. 6 99. 00 '----'---893. 14 ------ 55. 3 0.00 572.00 42.8 0. 00 16, 529. 82 60. 6 7, 154. 77' 55,311: 87 -"''57. 9 114.40 9.13.20 114.40 913.20 0. 00- .__..._- _.__.._...977. 31 --38. 4 ...'.._' 489. 37. 51, 359. 24 4. 0 0. 00 20, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 ... - ... .. 911: 13 96: 9 489. 37 73. 247. 68 30. 3 • 0. 00 2, 586. 80 26. 0 0. 00 2, 586. 80 26. 0 81. 940. 90 85, 636. 46 562, 181.09 599. 464. 90 7, 644. 14 8, 133. 51 449, 777. 77 483, 851. 59 55. 8 55. 6 i • N� � � CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH rzw�wcs-r�*n� ----' sxpswo�roes SUMMARY.REPORT- '�oY`puwo, p��s 0030 ��_ -- ._' _ '_---'__'-'_-' ______ � �, TIME 10:42:38 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03r14/90 �' ---- y." FUND DIV ooJr DESCR ---110.PARKING FUND 8148 CIP e9-148 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 66. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE A c 25 APPROPR I AT ION I r" 1 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES *201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PR IvArE 108000. 00 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 108000. 00 0. 00 DIVISION -TOTAL --- -N -'_ 108 - 0- 00_ " 8701 CIP 89-701 DEP T: OTHER PROJECTS ,, (4122 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10.000.00 0.00------'10r009:00 o. o o:o- o. 0 0. 00 0. 00 10,000. 00 0. 0 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT osnvzcs/pnIvArs o.000.on 0. 00 0. 00 ooJsor SUB TOTAL 5.000.00 0. 00 0. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL = - --- 2.1 ,o 37 y-"" ,, ' • = '" `` ----- 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 " , 0. 00 58000. 00 0. 0 ` 0. 00 5. 000. 00 0. 0 19e. 15 192. 15- o.o 0. 00 0. 00. -oroo ---192. 1n•------192��n- uo � DIVISION roroL---- --'---:----n.000 oo.---'-----o.00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 5, 000. no 0. 00 0. 00 'x90 15 19e. 15 4.807.85 n.a el 325. 66 968, 398. 08 61. 1 • - . ^ e 410. et, 113 STATE GAS TAX FUND - . • 1,2 _ EINANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 FUND DIV (MUT DESCR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT : 3 - .. . - ..... - . . . 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ' 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 47. 272. 00 3, 939. 33 31, 514. 64 0. 00 15, 757. 36 66.6 r, i OBJECT SUBTOTAL 47, 272. 00 3, 939. 33 31, 514: 64 0. 00 -----15,-757:.36*----- 66:6 ---- "i• ,_ E2 .:, . _ - - DIVISION • - TOTAL 47 ; 272..00 3, 939:33 317514764 0. 00 15, 757:36 66. 6 A. DEPARTMENT TOTAL 47, 272. 00 3, 939. 33 31, 514. 64 0. 00 15, 757. 36 66.6 24 _ - -----..--..- 12 if DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 8150 CIP 89-150 1-..-'.-- --- -4200 CONTRACT SERVICES • ,3 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 I_ OBJECT SUBTOTAL 15,000.00 . 0.00 0.00 [12.________. 4V, DIVISION TOTAL 15, 000. 00 0. 00 8160 CIP 85-160 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 1-- 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES iJ1 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 0.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 15, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 15, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 15, 000. 00 0.00 0 . 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 8170 CIP 87-170 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY • 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 337, 219. 00 0. 00 136. 32 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 337, 219. 00 0. 00 136. 32 Ctsi 146 4V, DIVISION TOTAL 337, 219. 00 0. 00 8171 CIP 87-171 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY • - --••-•-•-••• 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 0. 00 337, 082. 68 0. 00 337, 082. 68 136.32 0 . 0 0.0 • •:! • 0. 00 337, 082. 68 0. 0 . . _ 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 21, 305. 00 0.00 .11 51 r 136. 32 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 21, 305. 00 0. 00 136. 32 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 21, 168. 68 O. 6 21, 168. 68 O. 6 21,305.00 0. 00 136. 32 0. 00 21, 168. 68 0. 6 1t 177 31 r3. r FINANCE—FA454 TIME 10:42:38 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -------------- EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT- (BY FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE --115 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 8171 CIP 87-171 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER DEPARTMENT- TOTAL - FUND TOTAL PAGE -0032 DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 272.-64 420, 796. 00 3, 939. 33 31, 787. 28 0.00 373, 251.36 389, 008. 72 O - . CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH , - FINANCE—FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)- PACE 0033 ,•-• 6, TIME 10: 42: 38 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 I 3 • : 1 ... I i --- • _-_— _ - _ _ — ✓ 5 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % -1 - -.. - - 7 ----- 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND ...: .3 .,..- 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ,.: ....' 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 5, 000. 00 28, 000. 00— 5, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 100. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5,- 000.- 00 . 28, 000. 00— 5, 00000 0.00 0.00 -100. 0 --- IC IL: :e t: 2., 5, 000. 00 28, 000. 00— 5, 000. 00 0. 00 100. 0 - - — -• 4 66. 07OF YEAR COMPLETE • - ✓ a fp r 12 r • • - - • _ 19 • , - • - • .2 o r r • • .17 4 --.-..--.__... r r • DIVISION .....TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 5,000.00. — ---28, 000:00 -- -57000.-00 5, 000. 00 28, 000. 00— 5, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 07'00 0. 00 0. 00 100 0- 100. 0 -- FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT -(BY FUND) PAGE 0034 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE ----125-PARK-AND RECREATION FACILITIES 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT ----OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 L_ -___-._---.____ . -__ DIVISION -TOTAL-------- 5, 000. DEPARTMENT TOTAL 5,000.00 DEPT: PARKS 8506 CIP 86-506 -4200 CONTRACT SERVICES is 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 26,570.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 26, 570.00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 5,000.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL -5,000.00 r-,, DIVISION ' TOTAIL.........._-._ --- - ' 31,-570.00' 8508 CIP 87-508 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 52, 500. 00 52, 500. 00 is .1 416.66 3,333.35 416. 66 -----'- 3, 333: 35 0. 00 1, 666. 65 66. 6 0. 00 ----'---1; 666: 65----66:- 6---- 416: 5---66:-6-- 416:66- ----3x333:35 0.00- 416.66 3,333.35 17666:65 0. 00 1,666.65 66. 6 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 26, 570. 00 0. 0 0. 00 26, 570. 00 0. 0 0. 00 4, 846. 81 • 0. 00 _._.. ___-.-.4, 846: 81 0. 00 '- --- 4, 846:81 0. 00 153. 19 96. 9 0. 00-------153.'19------96: 9--- 0. 00 10, 536. 59 0. 00 •_.._._......_.... 10, 536. 59 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER - 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS --- ------- 2, 500:00 -- ------,0:00- c:, OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2,500.00 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 55, 000. 00 86, 570. 00 91, 570. 00 0. 00 0. 00 416. 66 2i 379: 29 2, 379. 29 12, 915. 88 17.762: 69 21, 096. 04 0. 00 41, 963. 41 20. 0 0. 00 _......__,_. 41, 963:41' 0. 00 -'-' - _ -120: '71-._. 95...1 0. 00 120. 71 95. 1 0. 00 42, 084. 12 23. 4 68, 807. 31--- "-- -20. 5 0. 00 70, 473. 96 23. 0 ,4 111 l:. '`�«��(��� .4) -rzw*wcs-rA*z4 CITY OF HERMOSA osAc* |.\ TIME 10:42:38 - -sxpsmoIrons SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) -'- - ' - PAGE 0035' - FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 i'2. UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND. - ---'-- | r_`" ' '--- ----- TRANSFER, ^��� BUDGET DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT |'---- ' -~--' - ------ '' '--- , • • • j � AppnopnIAT ION MONTHLY EXP YTD sxpwo ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. " .�^ y~ . 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ' |'��o�� OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT �o.00n�oo n�oo xo.00u'oo o oo o oo �uo n.^ `,. OBJECT SUBTOTAL 15.000.00 -o.ou-15.000'ou I:,� 000--�oo� o '` /^^| If .-t |":------- --------- °,",S,=. ------------------------- DEPARTMENTDEPARTMENT TOTAL 15,o00. 00 u00 15, 000. 00 8514 czp 89-514 DEPT: PARKS --'4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT osevIcs/pnIw^rs 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 26. 40 0. 00 0. 00 26. 40 0. 00 5500 LAND 5501 LAND 1, 578, 004. 00 10, 000. 1, ~=�� �- ,^ - OBJECT�SUBTOTAL '1�ro oo* ou --- ~~~'~~�'' . . � 10, 000. ..uoo� ���a77 r-= = . 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS �------'---- 6900 LEASE pAvmswra----'- --145, 545. no ----- 145.545'00 ------ 145,-545:00 ° •`" 47: 0. 00 1cm.o 26.40- 26.40- 0. 0 0. 0 0. 00 10, 000 23 99 3 u.uo'----- ---1o.000. 23-----99.3 --`---- u on -----------o. 00----100.- 0' ' DIVISION TOTAL 1.723.549.00 135,•545. 00 1.713.575. 17 0. 00 9.973.83 99.* --------- ---- DEPARTMENT TOTAL --------- 1.723.549,00--'--135.545.00-'-'1, 713. 575. 17 0.00---'---9.973.83 - 99. 4 -- FUND roTAL_______.___ 1.73e.549.00 135. 545. 00 1.728.575. 17 0. 00 9.973.e3 99. 4 ]- _ _ • `l- �.� ..1 C • 1---FINANCE—FA454 - 4t, TIME 10:42:38 -•--• • •.• -•• • - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ------- ----------- - - EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT -(BY FUND) PAGE FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR:_ APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP C. —127-6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND C' 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER rI DIVISION -TOTAL-------1,354,-771:00 112,897:58-----903r180.64 0.00 451759636 66.6 •I DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1,354,771.00 112,897.58 903,180.64 0.00 451,590.36 66.6 • FUND TOTAL 1,354,771.00 112,897.58 903,180.64 0.00 451,590.36 66.6 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT •• • - .- • .•.-•--- • •. YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 1,354,771.00 112,897.58 903,180.64 0. 00 451,590.36 66.6 ------- OBJECT SUBTOTAL • -. — — 112,897.58 -----903,180.64- ---0.00 .451,590:36 4 .1 17 111 o" 1' • INANCE-FA454 TIME 10: 42: 38 1 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR ----•140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT- BLOCK -GR r!, _4701 HOUSING REHAB CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY F(JND)* FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 PAGE 0037 , DATE 03/14/90 66.0/. OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % Z. 7 b DEPT: OTHER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 92,072.00 0.00 0.00 IOBJECT SUBTOTAL - 92,072.00 eTh, DIVISION TOTAL 92, 072.-00 - 0.00 0.00 rs; 4702 PROJECT TOUCH DEPT: OTHER 410: 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 7, 670. 00 0. 00 1, 450. 00 -------- --- OBJECT SUBTOTAL ---7.670.00 0. 00 1, 450. 00 r'12:1 DIVISION TOTAL 74 670: 00 4703 CDBG ADMIN DEPT: OTHER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 12, 276. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL - -- 12, 276. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 0. 00 - -1, 450700 0. 00 92, 072. 00 0. 0 O. 00 92, 072. 00 0. 0 0. 00 92;07200 0. 0 0.00 6,220.00 18.9 0.00--------6,220:00------18.9-------- 0. -------- /.4 ".• 21: 27 7. 1 2,165.19 7,729.17 2,165:19 12.276:00-----2, 165. 19 L., 4704 9.13. FREE CLINIC DEPT: OTHER I17 ri, 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4, 200. 00 1, 050. 00 1--1----- ------ -- OBJECT SUBTOTAL - - -• - - ------ 4, 200: 00---------1, 050. 00 .! DIVISION TOTAL 7,729717 0. 00 4, 546. 83 62. 9 0. 00 -4,546: 83---62. 2, 100. 00 2,100:00 4, 200:00 1, 050. 00 2, 100. 00 • i; 4705 JUVENILE DIVSN DEPT: OTHER 410:1.7 14, 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 3, 000. 00 237.80 - OBJECT SUBTOTAL --3. 000. 00 - 237. 80 DIVISION TOTAL .11 -... • 0.00 2, 100. 00 50.0 ,:- 0. 00 - 2i-100. 00 -50. 0 . .., 0: 00 • • 2, 100. 00- 752. 85 0. 00 2, 247. 15 25. 0 752:85 0. 00 ..........2. 247. 15 ----- 23. 0 3, 000. 00-...........................237. 80-------752. 85 4706 S.B. COAL ALIVE DEPT: OTHER r• 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 253.00 0.00 252.68 -.•-•._ • •- • 0. 00 -- ------ 2, 247: 15 -- --- 25.0 0. 00 0. 32 99. 8 • --•_ _ • -• ,,- -----FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 n , ---140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK -GR �,; 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES �., ,OBJECT SUBTOTAL FUND DIV OBJT DESCR f -.. H.) I` r= rI„ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -----------------EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT--'(BY-FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 PAGE- 0038 DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 253. 00 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 253.00 4707 1736 FAM CR CTR DEPT: OTHER 252.68 0.00 0. 32 99. 8 0.00 252.68 0.00 0. 32 99. 8 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES- 4201 ERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 2,544.00 0.00 2,544.00 0.00 0.00 100.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2,544.00 0. 00 2,544.00 0. 00 0. 00 100. 0 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 2, 544. 00 0. 00 2, 544. 00 122, 015. 00 3, 452. 99 14, 828. 70 122, 015. 00 3, 452. 99 ---------14, 828-70 0.00 0.00 100.0 0. 00 2 4 8 i L 27 107, 186. 30 12. 1 0. 00 e --FINANCE-FA434 IME 10:42:38 r FUND DIV OBJT DESCR ---145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND -- - 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY - - FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. PAGE 0039 DATE 03/14/90 66. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.G 7 .. r 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER I" 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT • , '7, '020:00 0.00 0.00 r------------- OBJECT SUBTOTAL •- 0.00 0.00 -0:00 r., I-:1--------------------- DIVISION •--TOTAL--- -- - --- -----------0.•00- H• -0.00 -0:00 0.00 r...;,, 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 • DEPARTMENT TOTAL O. 00 3401 DIAL A RIDE DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 14, 958. 00 1, 211. 08 10, 201. 68 4180 RETIREMENT 1, 888. 00 4. 13 1, 096. 48 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1, 439. 00 124. 91 693. 96 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 18, 285. 00 1, 340. 12 11, 992. 12 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 136, 094. 00 27. 085. 50 27, 085. 50 O. 00 109, 008. 50 19. 9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 136, 094. 00 27, 085. 50 27, 085. 50 O. 00 109, 008. 50 19. 9 4300 MATER I ALS/SUPPL IES/OTHER 6 LC, 11 12 13 1.1 r., 17 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 4, 756. 32 68. 2 0.00 791. 52 58.0 0. 00 -745. 04 48. 2--- 0. 00 6, 292. 88 65. 5 4304 TELEPHONE 50.00 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 88.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 638.00 4. 16 - 29. 12 0. 00 20. 88 58. 2 0. 45 O. 45 0.00-----499.55--'----'0. 0 7. 29 59. 32 0. 00 28. 68 67. 4 11.90 88.89 0.00 549. 11 13.9 DIVISION TOTAL 155, 017. 00 28,437.52 39,166.51 r- :I 3402 COMMUTER • I :7 31 _ --...•.•_.•.... BUS DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES - - -- 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 5, 403. 00 385. 98 3, 574. 54 4180 RETIREMENT 681.00 1.28 397.97 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 549. 00 -43.26---'253:38 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6, 633. 00 430. 52 4. 225. 89 - 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ------ -- - -- 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 49, 000. 00 3, 931. 00 11, 695. 09 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 49, 000. 00 3. 831. 00 11, 695. 09 4300 MATER I ALS/SUPPL IES/OTHER 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 52. 00 0.44 32. 92 0. 00 115, 850. 49 25. 2 0. 00 1, 828. 46 66. 1 0. 00 283. 03 58. 4 0. 00 - 295. 62. -- -46. 1 0. 00 2, 407. 11 63. 7 - - O. 00 37, 304. 91 23. B 0. 00 37, 304. 91 • 23. 8 0. 00 19. 08 63. 3 21: • TIME 10:42:38 � CITY OF *snMosA BEACH ----'-------sxpsmoIroes SUMMARY espcmr' (ov-puwo) PAGE- 0040 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION a--'1«m'peopoa/rIow 'Arowo OBJECT SUBTOTAL 52. 00 u4« • 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE y~.^ oe 92' 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 55.685.00 *e61.96 -------- - - 3403 BUS PASS SUBSDY DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT -4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 15,953.90 0. 00 39, 731. 10 28.6 r., *102 REGULAR aALAersa/nIou 1.664.00 128.40 475.*6 0.00 �o 1 o 54 28.5 1,.�410* REGULAR OVERTIME 0.00 • 0.00 0.61 0.00 ' 0.61- 0.0 .., 4180 RETIREMENT / � . 216. 00 --'------ 0.00 -123.86 000----------mz x�-----��z � . -^88 ���BENEFITS"149.0013.54ms 68 " 00'�_ _ 9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL• ��oo �*� � _ ,705. 61 �� °"��* m�v " , 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES II 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT ----------'- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 43MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER --- ----.-. 12, 773oo 1.325.00 6.14e 00 6, 142. oo 0. 00 6.631.00 «a.o 0.00.-------6r6317:00------48:0------- ���--. �--------- 4396 rnapn OUT -INS USER c*uo'---------a75.u0--�--'--14, n2---------5"~-�"_ �= OBJECT SUBTOTAL ��� -�- ~�~0.00 - 369:61 ��r -' =2.32- 505 .39 0.00 369.61 57.7 DIVISION -._^. - .".°� �n.677.oo 1.o24. 62 7, 353. ou ' o,00 e.ou4.00 46.9 ^� � �----------3406 CIRC ELEMENT - -�----nEpr�--PUBLIC TRANSIT- ' ' ' «-= - ---------- i � 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ^ ' '�-------- 4uo1CONTRACT asnvzos/pnIvArs----1r�rn5:0o-----------o.00--------�-1o:oo 0.oo-----'-1rrr2o.'on--o.o ' " .~J^^. SUBTOTAL 17, 735. oo o� oo 1e� oo o�oo ��.�eo�oo o�o �1• 40 r- " = ° 410. 81*9 CIP 90-149 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY ., 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 23.000.00 DIVISION TOTAL 17,735.00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL- -4'''-- .- "^°.^° 62.485. O. 00 0.00 17,723.00 0.0 ,•^ " 40.23 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00 -' 57188 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 571ae 571:: 88 571. 88 -47e:13• o.o--- «ro. 13 1, 050. 01- 0. o .c r13 145 GRANT FUND --- - -- I 8149 CIP 90-149 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY -FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 r FUND DIV ODJT DESCR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION DIVISION DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 25, 000. 00 25, 000. 00 '-PAGE 0041 -- DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 612. 11 612. 11 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 612. 11 478. 13 612. 11 478. 13 23, 909.76 4.3 23, 909. 76 4. 3 ' , - - FUND TOTAL ---- - 269,114:00-- -34, 636;21-- --63, 097. 52 478.13' -- 205v536:-35-----23.6 r - L' • rIwAmcs-rA454 TIME 10: 42: 38 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH '--- --------'---sxpswozTons SUMMARY nsponr'(ov-ruwo FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/2B/90 PAGE 0042 DATE 03/14/90 66. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 8102 CIP 85-102 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY --- CONTRACT SERVICES��.. ��vv ., 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 188.051.00 74, 766. 51 120.133.30 o no ar 917ru 63 o T-, OBJECT SUBTOTAL 188.051.00 74, 766. 51 • ��oo.1no.on o oo-----ar'91r'ro an�a ' .^ ° r,,, e137 CIP 85-137 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY a'------' --'----'-'--- *200,CONTRACT SERVICES = .*291 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 68, 366. 00 o.uoo.00 0. 00 ao 366 00 /� ----'- OBJECT SUBTOTAL -----aa.oaa.00 -- ''----o.00'----.----''-m��oo o oo ----�o'oaa oo = 11, DIVISION TOTAL- -,, 8151 CIP 89-151 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY • "17 r` - 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 DIVISION 'TOTAL- o.00----------o.00----------nrnoDEPARTMENT TOTAL 256, 417. 00 74, 766. 51 120, 133. 30 8512 CIP 89-512 DEPT: PARKS �--'-- 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES -'----------__ 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE oa.000.on 0. 00 ki OBJECT SUBTOTAL se, oou.00 u.uo N�~DIVISION TOTAL 58, 000. 00 01:7o516 CIP 89-516 DEPT: PARKS -0000 EQUIPMENT '-------''-------- ----' 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 795e.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 7.95e.00 " '^ z "' = "` 0.o o�o------- m.00-------ao/oaa'.-on' o�o'-------�� • . 0. 00 0. 00 o.o 'o.o-------�' 0. 00 136, 283. 70 «6.o i 0. 00 0. 00 o.uo 0. 00 oo.uoo.no 0. 0 58, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 no.00u�oo o�o _--� _-_`----__ ____- ` .1 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 r.pnaoo 0. 0 i 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 r.95�oo ' 0.-0 /� ! - -----------'----------�� �----------------------! / 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7.958.00 0. 0 . '� '/� � / | , - FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR ,� 150 GRANT FUND (-lc! 8517 CIP 89-517 t.i CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) - FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. DEPT: PARKS 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION ----TOTAL 8, 742. 00 8, 742. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -- - 0. 00 8, 742: 00......_- ..... - - 0. 00 8518 CIP 89-518 DEPT: PARKS 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 12.305.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 12, 305. 00 - DIVISION TOTAL ---- 12, 305: 00 8519 CIP 89-519 DEPT: PARKS 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 2,108.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL ------...--- 2, 108. 00....._. DIVISION TOTAL 2, 108. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 89, 113. 00 FUND TOTAL 345.530.00 - ' PAGE 0043 DATE 03/14/90 66. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE • 0. 00 O.00 0.00 8, 742. 00 0. 0 8.742. 00 -'---'-- 0. 0 8T-742:-00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 12, 305. 00 ------0.-00 --- 12. 305.-00 - 0. 00 -0: 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 74, 766. 51 0. 00 --------12; -305. -00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 120, 133. 30 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 0 2, 108. 00 0. 0 2;'108. 00 89, 113. 00 225, 396. 70 0. 0 34. 7 • f ;' ---- FINANCE-FA454 r:: TIME 10:42:38 rr. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT' (BY'FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION 155 CROSSING GUARD FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT k I r.0 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 4,500.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4,500.00 --•------•-• DIVISION ----TOTAL 4,500.00- DEPARTMENT ,500:00- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 4,500.00 2102 CROSSING GUARD DEPT: POLICE ---------4100 PERSONAL SERVICES .----.- .. 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME -- - 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF - 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4113 CROSSING GUARDS 4180 RETIREMENT • • 4187 UNIFORMS 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 31...__-_._._.-.---_... OBJECT SUBTOTAL . .-. 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. PAGE 0044 DATE 03/14/90 66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE iG 375. 00 3, 000. 00 375. 00 --'----3, 000-00 375:00 ---3,-000-00 375. 00 3, 000. 00 0. 00 1, 500. 00 0. 00 - '----- -1, 500: 00 0.00--- 17 500:00 66. 6 66. 6 0. 00 1, 500. 00 66. 6 12, 145. 00 901, 03 7, 070. 88 0.00 0.00 15.24 238. 00 - - -- . - : 0. 00 187.98 238.00 0.00 318.67 33, 321. 00 2, 427. 01 15, 178. 47 ----- - 2, 765. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 876.00 71.64 599.26 .. 50, 583. 00 - . -- 3,399.58 -- 24,202.56 "' ---- 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER r .t 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL • DIVISION TOTAL- --DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL - 8, 400. 00 - -- 0. 00 - 500. 00 0. 00 8, 900. 00 0. 00 0. 00 5, 074. 12 58. 2 0. 00 15. 24- 0. 0 0. 00 ------------ 50. 02 ----- 78. 9 ' ---- 0.00 80.67- 133.8 0. 00 .18, 142. 53 45. 5 0. 00 "-' `- r` 1; 932. 94' 30. 0 ----- O. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0 0.00 276.74 68.4 -0. 00 26,-380. 44 "--_--...47.8 - ._.__._.....6; 400. 00 --, - 23. 8 ' 0.00 0.00 500. 00 0.0 2, 000. 00 0. 00 6, 900. 00 22. 4 1,814.00 177.60- 1,089.41 -_..-__ 1, 814. 00' -- - 177. 60-- - 1 089. 41' 61, 297. 00 65, 797. 00 0.00 724.59 60.0 3, 221. 98 -_.._..___.27; 291': 97"--_-_.__.._... 0. 00. . __ ..._.-34; 005: 03 --' "' .. 44: 5 --- 3,221.98 .'- 3,221.98 3,596.98 27, 291.97 30, 291.97 0. 00 34, 005. 03 44. 5 0. 00 35, 505. 03 46. 0 2 r U u 1r, 411.„1 TIME 10:42:38 HI FUND DIV OBJT DESCR r„ -160 SEWER FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)----------- - -- FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3, 289. 00 3, 289. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. PAGE 0043-- ----- DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 274.17 2,193.36 274.17 2,193.36 : •- DIVISION - TOTAL - - -- 3, 289. 00 274.-17 • 2r19336 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3,289.00 274.17 2,193.36 41. 3102 SEWER/ST DRAIN DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 0 irI 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 94, 302. 00 7, 203. 55 55, 308. 73 .1 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1, 500. 00 274.08 1, 641. 95 1-----------------4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 1, 878. 00 O. 00 0:00 0. 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,329.00 0.00 2,328.98 4180 RETIREMENT 11,361.00 0.39 6,833.79 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8,923.00 522.58 4, 504:29 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 120, 293. 00 8, 000. 60 70, 617. 74 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES r-, 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL • • • r ! '1 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 0. 00 1, 095. 64 66. 6 0. 00 0.00 1,095:64 0. 00 1, 095. 64 0. 00 38, 993. 27 0. 00 141. 95- O. 00 18 78. 00 0. 00 0. 02 0.00 4, 527. 21 0. 00 4, 418:71 0. 00 49, 675. 26 66.6 66.6 58.6 109.4 99.9 60.1 50.4 58.7 2, 700. 00 0. 00 662.42 0. 00 2, 037. 58 24. 5 2, 850. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 850. 00 0. 0 5, 550. 00 0. 00 662.42 0. 00 4,887:58 11. 9 - 4303 UTILITIES 500.00 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 7,500.00 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 800.00 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2,025.00 4316 TRAINING 0.00 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 27,251.00 39. 67 311:94 109.59 6,487.79 50.77 507.96 337.44 2, 600. 82 0. 00 0.00 3,674.44- 16,005.69 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 38,076.00 3,136.97- 25,914.20 - 662.42 0. 00 '188. 06 ' 62. 3 662. 42 349. 79 95. 3 0. 00 292. 04 63. 4 0. 00 575. 82- 128. 4 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 11, 245. 31 58. 7 11, 499. 38 69. 7 • 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 9,070.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 9,070.00 748. 32 6,734.-88 O. 00 ---2.335. 12 74. 2 748. 32 6, 734. 88 O. 00 2, 335. 12 74. 2 DIVISION TOTAL 172, 989. 00 5,611.95 DEPARTMENT TOTAL - 172,989.00 5, 611. 95 8405 CIP 86-405 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 154, 000. 00 . • .. 103,929.24 103,- 929:-24 -+ 662. 42 68, 397. 34 60. 4 662.- 42 -68,- 397: 60.. 4 0. 00 151, 983. 75 0. 00 2,016.25 98. 6 • • --FIwAmos-rA454- -• - f+' TIME 10:*2:38 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH --'- -------sxpswoIruns SUMMARY REPORT ' (BY FUND) PAGE 00*/.3 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/2e/90 DATE 03/14/90 66.o% OF YEAR COMPLETE rt FUND DIV ooJrocoue APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE z -'-��o-�swsn FUND -- ' '- -- - 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ------ ------------------- ___ ___ _ OBJECT SUBTOTAL ___'_zn4,000.00 0. 00 151, 983. 75 0. 00 2.016.25 9e. 6 --- 1,2 DIVISION TOTAL 154'000.00 o.noxn�/*oo�7o o.no 2, 016. va. 6 .^ 8406 CIP 88-406 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER --�------------------------------- [:!--------4ouo CONTRACT �SERVICES '.."_. ~ i. OBJECTSUBTOTAL ��o�mowrnAorosnvIcs/pnIw^rs on.000.00 o.00 o.00 o.00 oo.000 oo o n • DIVISION TOTAL 80.000.00 0. 00 0. 00 e407 CIP 88-407 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER 12, ----- -42oo CONTRACT SERVICES '--'------- = 4201 OBJECT• CONTRACT osnvzus/pnzw^rE 14.500.00 0. 00SUBTOTAL 14, 500. 00 |r •" 0. 00 80, 000. 00 0. 0 -- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 14, 500. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 14, 500. oo 0. 00 0. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 24o.500. 00 o. 00 151, 983. 75 FUND TOTAL � -'-------------424.7713.00 0. 00 14, 500 00 0. 0 0. 00 96, 516. 25 61. 1 1. . , y " " s '^ `" ., it ., '" ,, •. ^ • ' ' " It rL • ;FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND -- CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) - FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0.00 DIVISION - TOTAL - - - - O. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 0.00 2103 SPEC INVESTGTNS DEPT: POLICE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES _ • 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 0.00 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 158,692.00 ---- ----- 4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY -._____. 10, 560. 00 4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL • • ., r 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES --- - 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4322UNCLASSIFIED 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL .-- --- - -- 0. 00 0. 00 2, 800. 00 172, 052. 00 8, 000. 00 8, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. PAGE '-' 0047 - DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE iL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10, 301.00 660. 00 - 1. 560. 60 2, 459. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00- 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 80, 918. 50 5, 060. 00 18, 267. 46 2, 459. 00 175.02 - 1.400: 16 15, 155. 62 108, 105. 12 0. 00 0. 00 5,489.55 5,489.55 0. 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0. 00 77, 773. 50 50. 9 0. 00 ------ - 5,-500. 00' ------ 47. 9 ---- 0. 00 18, 267. 46- 0. 0 0. 00 2, 459. 00- 0. 0 0. 00---- ----- 1, 399: 84'----50:0------.- O. 00 63, 946. 88 62. 8 0. 00 2, 510. 45 68. 6 0. 00 2, 510. 45 68. 6 4, 560. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 560. 00 0. 0 6, 000. 00 ..._......_.._._. _.... 0. 00 ..__....... ...... - O. 00 -- -- ... 0. 00 ._..__. 6, 000. 00 ....--_._. 0. 0 5, 000. 00 648. 27 1, 760. 69 0. 00 3, 239. 31 35. 2 14, 516. 00 223. 6B 9, 319. 84 0. 00 5, 196. 16 64. 2 30. 076.00 -------..-------- 871. 95 -------11, 080: 53 ---- 0. 00----------18, 995. 47 - ---36. 8 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 4, 000. 00 0. 00 5403 VEHICLES 25, 600. 00 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 29, 600. 00 0. 00 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 0.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 ----0.00 DIVISION TOTAL --- - 239, 728. 00 - - - 16, 027. 57 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 239, 728. 00 16, 027. 57 127.00- 23, 637. 68 23, 764. 68 0. 00 3, 873. 00 __._._...._.._.. 3. 1 0. 00 1, 962. 32 92.3 0. 00 5, 835. 32 80. 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00--- -- 0:00...- 0.0... 148.-439.- 88 148, 439. 8B 0. 00 ----- -91, 288. 12 ---- - 61 9 0. 00 91, 288. 12 61.9 • _I. 10 n i, (" I;^ FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR ---•170 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 143 • p:r OW CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH --------------•-- ---•EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT .(BY FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 PAGE 0048 F� s DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 2103 SPEC INVESTGTNS DEPT: POLICE 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER -• FUND TOTAL --- ,• 2 3 4 u 7 ,c 11 ,2 -239. 728: 00 16x027. 57.. 148x439': 80 0. 00 91; 288: 12— -61: 9'--- 4 n n ,0 0 :0 2.2 7.7 21 3 • • • C� I-- f1=FINANCE-FA434 IME 10:42:3B r., FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND -- r! r:11 :: 40, • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) --------------- FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL - - 0.00 - -- DIVISION----TOTAL- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2202 HYDRANT UPGRADE ---- 0; 00 0. 00 DEPT: FIRE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 170,792.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 170,792.00 r 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE • 2.3: e 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -- - - 0: 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00---0: 0- 0. 00 0. 0 0.00 0.0 0. 00 19, 654. 94 0. 00 19, 654. 94 325. 00 27. 00 325. 00 - -- - 27. 00 -171, 117. 00 171, 117. 00 171, 117. 00 2, 573. 00 2, 573. 00 148, 564. 06 13. 0 148, 564. 06 13. 0 13 14 Is 17 is ID :0 21 31 216. 06 0. 00 216.- 06 0. 00 27. 00-- -----19, 871.-00 27. 00 19, 871. 00 27. 00 19, 871. 00 2, 573. 00 2, 573. 00 2, 573. 00 108. 94 66. 4 108:94 66 4 148, 673. 00 --- -----13. 1 --- 148, 673. 00 148, 673. 00 13. 1 13. 1 7:1 , • rIwAmos-FA454 TIME 40:42:3e CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ----------- -------'--.EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY- FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 PAGE0050 DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. �---705-IwaunAmcs FUND - ," 1209 LIABILITY INS • DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT v~. `^ • .` '" 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN *180 RETIREMENT --4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 21.094.00 1, 735. 50 *or.00----'--'--'o.uo 407. 00 0. 00 2.654.00 3.87 o.mzo.00---- 266: 89 13,716.23 --- 0700 541.20 1.o1a.p1 17, 393. 83 '*200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4e01 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE e97.44e.00 1.010.00 235, 080. 50 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 297,448.00 1.010.00 235.080.50 • 7.377.77 ao.o '----407:00------oo 134. 20- xoo. 9 1.135-09 nr.o 1.207.51 57.2 9,993.17 63.5 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 0.00 109.88 4315 MEMBERSHIP 188.00 *316 TRAINING 275.00 49.84147.96 4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 72.000.00 18.587.78 52,423.82 OBJECT SUBTOTAL - -72,951. 00 .18,657.62 52,869:66 o*oo EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS ~rnAw-*muu---------^woroo-o:oo . 0.00 - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 400.00 0.00 ` 0.00 DIVISION TOTAL 398,186.00 21,673.88 305,343.99 �------�o�oAurorpeopraowoo -------- ospr:-mumr/aupponr-�----------------------� ' r-= :: ---------- 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE--,-----30,850:00----------606:00 • 23.14e.40 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 30,850 .00 606.00 23./*2.40 ---'--'----y000 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER--------------- ---____ 4324 cLAzms/Ss IVrTLEmsmro 8,000.00 0.00 233.24 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 8,000.00 0.00 e33.e4 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES r^` •.2 (10'" 15. DIVISION ___-__._- 1210 UNEMPLOYMENT TOTAL ?o.aso.00 606. 00 23, 375. 64 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES ' DEPT: mGmr/ouppoer * 4186 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS -- 577. - ~~^~'^�' ��uo 4, 919. 62 20.968. 99 55 0. 00 62.367.50 79. 0 0. 00 62, 367 50 79. 0 0. 00 390. 12 0.00------'---12. 00- 0. 00 127. 04 0. 00 19, 576. 18 0. 00 20, 081:34 21.9 106:8------- 53.8 ra.o 72: 4 0.00 --------- «oo.0. 00 400. 00 0. 0 oo-----'o��n----'--- " ,` 4 , ° '" " ° • . ". ^ " 1_ •• ' o.00-------rrrur��o-----r��o-----,---o' 0.00 7,707.60 75.0 -----'-- ---'' ----�-�' __-..- | 756. 97 r.00p.rr 12.3 •' - 756.97 7,009.79 12�o - �--' -- ----�1 756.97 14,717.39 62.1 0. 00 4.608.01 81,9 • • • I NANCE-FA454 r• f1 TIME 10:42:38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 3 -705 INSURANCE FUND 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL _......__ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT- (13Y FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 --,,' --,,h<4 ,..' • '4'/'*.,=,.,‘,r4-7'.-T,V., DATE 03/14/90 ; 66. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 4 6 APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP DIVISION TOTAL 1217 WORKERS COMP PERSONAL SERVICES' r 17 • 12-L 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - • OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT: 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4180 RETIREMENT 4182 WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR 25 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES- 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL :11 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4316 TRAINING OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION 3-3 --1218 MEDICARE r.n 25, 577. 00 4, 919. 62 25, 577. 00 MGMT/SUPPORT YTD EXPND. 20, 968. 99 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 4, 608. 01 81. 9 4, 919. 62 20, 968. 99 0. 00 4, 608. 01 81. 9 7 26, 752. 00 520. 00 520. 00 3, 366. 00 207, 000. 00 2, 239. 76 0. 00 0. 00 3. 87 31, 271. 11 4, 225. 00 - 374. 11 242, 383. 00 - - 28, 605. 00 28, 605. 00 200. 00 1, 220. 00 1, 420. 00 33, 888. 85 1, 333. 34 1, 333. 34 17, 639. 81 0. 00 - 541-: 20 1, 948. 96 119,973.94 2,449.43 142,553.34 0. 00 9, 112. 19 0. 00 520. 00 0. 00 21: 20- 0.00 1, 417. 04 65. 9 0.0 57.9 0. 00 87, 026. 06 57. 9 0. 00 1, 775:- 57 - 57. 9 0. 00 99, 829. 66 58. 8 20, 744. 36 20, 744. 36 0. 00 7, 860. 64 72.5 • 0. 00 7, 860. 64 72. 5 • ; 30. 54 98. 34 95. 00- 143. 99 64. 46- 242. 33 TOTAL 272, 408. 00 35, 157. 73 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 163, 540. 03 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 33, 079. 00 2, 923. 65 21, 167. 94 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 33, 079. 00 2, 923. 65 21, 167. 94 DIVISION TOTAL 33, 079. 00 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT----MOMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPL I ES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT - OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 2, 923. 65 0. 00 ''0;0O 0.00 0.00 21,167.94 0.00 101.66 49.1 O. 00 1, 076. 01 0. 00 1, 177. 67 17. 0 0. 00 108, 867. 97 60. 0 0. 911. 06 -'--'63.9 0. 00 11, 911. 06 63. 9 O. 00 11, 911. 06 63. 9 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 1:1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -•-•.- —FINANCE—FA454 • • -------- — —EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT --(BY• FUND) PAGE 0052- iN TIME 10:42:38 FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 DATE 03/14/90 2 4 • .3 7 r 0 1.1 14 REPORT TOTALS 20,617.164.00 1,363,892.93 12,947,213.90 81,939.47 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 705 -INSURANCE FUND 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 100..00 — — --65, 280. 88- --- —534;-396-.-.59 12 rp4 • r-17 41,3 24 2`.T. n,e FUND TOTAL 768,100.00 65,280.88 534,396.59 56:-97----232,94644 756.97 232,946.44 7,588,010.63 69.6 63.1 70 411 al 41 , • • •••• CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - FEBRUARY 1990 FUND NUMBER GENERAL ACCOUNT 2/1/90 BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENTS WARRANTS ADJUSTMENTS 2/28/90 BALANCE 001 GENERAL $2,964,435.51 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT 1,359,814.26 110 PARKING 60,607.11 115 STATE GAS TAX 442,332.53 120 COUNTY GAS TAX 4,912.20 125 PARK REC.FAC.TAX 1,694,170.27 126 RAILROAD RT.OF WAY 391,320.17 127 6% UTILITY USERS TAX 40,545.94 140 CDBG 120,869.33 145 PROPOSITION A FUND 390,559.90 150 GRANT FUND 233,689.40 155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT 56,049.97 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE 1,644,010.13 170 POLICE ASSET SEIZURE 60,023.43 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 300,564.19 705 SELF INSURANCE FUND 587,271.43 $10,351,175.77 TRUST $ 702,505.60 34,154.92 233,320.75 - 0- - 0- 20,660.00 99,566.08 109,003.92 4,115.00 17,154..00 - 0- 6,961.54 5,445.28 15,067.00 -0- $1,247,954.09 $305,814.11 10,195..84 8,229.45 3,395.90 28,033.09 11,410.75 -0- 273.09 -0- 2,869.59 1,365.67 736.11 113,839.26 1,479.48 2,024.39 74,930.89 $ 564,597.62 $ 787,828.84 23,221.45 108,025.89 - 0- -0- - 0- 145,545.00 -0- 3,452.99 32,804.66 74,766.51 4,221.91 19,148.10 15,131.10 -0- 69,695.73 $1,283.842.18 $126,526.91 2,020.63 122,622.43 3,966.93 .61 531.51 2,674.91 116,913.54 8.21 12,915.08 28,001.24 559.53 3,242.51 1,302.95 47.18 142,804.48 $ 564,138.65 $3,058,399.47 1,378,922.94 71,508.99 441,761.50 32,944.68 1,725,709.51 342,666.34 32,909.41 121,523.13 364,863.75 132,287.32 58,966.18 1,740,904.06 45,068.86 317,608.40 449,702.11 $10,315,746.65 ACCOUNTS BALANCE RECEIVED PAID BALANCE STATEMENT BALANCE PAYROLL $2,086.24 $9,977,390.90 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $249 332.08 $453,201.64 INACTIVE DEPOSIT HELD BY FISCAL AGENT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY $600,279.47 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE $560,066.83 $560,557.00 $1,596.07 GENERAL $ PAYROLL OUTSTANDING CHECKS INACTIVE DEPOSIT BALANCE 406,894.97 637.63 407,532.60 316,912.86 90,619.74 10,226,722.98 10,317,342.72 March 19, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 27, 1990 AWARD OF BIDS RESTORATION OF BASEBALL/SOCCER FIELD AT VALLEY PARK AND TREE TRIMMING ON THE HERMOSA VALLEY GREENBELT, HERMOSA AVENUE MEDIAN AND GOULD AVENUE BETWEEN PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND EL OESTE Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council award the following two bids and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract agreements for: 1. Restoration of the baseball/soccer field at Valley Park with Southern California Tree and Landscape in an an amount not to exceed $27,225, which includes a 10% contingency ($22,300 was previously budgeted for this work); approve the appropriation of an additional $4,925 from the. Parks & Recreation Facility Tax Fund (CIP 89-506, Various Park Improvements). 2. Tree trimming on the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt, Hermosa Avenue. Median and Gould Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and El Oeste with Southern California Tree & Landscape in an amount not to exceed $4,840, which includes a 10% contingency. Background: Restoration of Baseball/Soccer Field at Valley Park: --The need for this renovation was recognizedand approved in the 1989-90 Budget. Maintenance, by the City, of the School District property adjacent to Valley Park was approved by Council on April 25, 1989 and added to the existing landscape maintenance contract. As stated in the staff report to City Council on April 25, 1990 the City had been receiving many complaints regarding this portion of Valley Park. In response to these complaints, the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission requested the staff of the School District and the Community Resources Department to meet and discuss a possible solution to this problem. The Agreement between the Hermosa Beach School District for the use of the School District property does not call out the restoration work by name, but without the restoration work being completed the City cannot fully use the premises for the intended park and recreational activities agreed to. Tree Trimming on the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt, Hermosa Avenue Median and Gould Avenue Median between Pacific Coast Highway and El Oeste: --This is normal trimming for Hermosa Avenue and the Gould Avenue median. However, the tree trimming on the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt is considered an emergency as the Pine trees are stressed and infected with pests. Pest control by the City's landscape contractor will follow the trimming. Residents bordering the Greenbelt on Valley and Ardmore will be notified of the project prior to start. - 1 - le Normally, a project of this dollar amount would not require City Council action; however, because the cost could have exceeded the $5,000 which would require Council action, staff determined the better course of action was the formal bid process. Analysis: The analysis will be divided as follows: 1. Restoration of Baseball/Soccer Field at Valley Park 2. Tree Trimming 3. Reference Check 4. Inspection Notice to Bidders, Special Provisions & Specifications are in the City Clerk's office for review. 1. Restoration of the Baseball/Soccer Field at Valley Park Twenty six companies received Request for bids. There were five (5) responses. On March 15, 1990 the sealed bids were publicly opened and read aloud. The results were as follows: Firm Bid Amount 1. Southern California Tree & Landscape 2. California Landscape Maintenance 3. Executive Landscape Contractors 4. Ryco Construction, Inc. 5. Bopark Enterprises $24,750.00 $28,800.00 $35,000.00 $43,134.00 $66,000.00 The playing field is uneven and may be potentially hazardous. The restoration area includes all of the Hermosa Beach School District property adjacent to Valley Park. Approximately one third of the area to be renovated is City property as shown on the map in the City Clerk's office. 2. Tree Trimming Ten (10) companies received Request for Bids. There were five (5) responses. On March 15, 1990 the sealed bids were publicly opened and read aloud. Firm Bid Amount 1. Southern California Tree & Landscape 2. Parker's Tree Service, Inc. 3. Traver's Tree Service 4. Johnny's Tree Service 5. California Landscape Maintenance 3. Reference Check $ 4,400.00 $ 5,030.76 $ 7,837.00 $13,717.00 $16,617.00 References were checked for Southern California Tree & Landscape. The reference check indicates that the firm is qualified to do the type of work required in both projects and to finish on schedule. The contractor has a valid C-27 license with the State of California and a City Business License will be obtained before commencement of work. 4. Inspection Inspection for both these projects will be performed in-house by the Public Works Department. Fiscal Impact: RESTORATION OF BASEBALL/SOCCER FIELD AT VALLEY PARK: FUNDING SOURCE: GENERAL FUND AND PARK & RECREATION FACILITIES FUND Budgeted Amount Parks Division FY 89-90 $22,300 Additional Appropriation from CIP 89-506 4,925 Contract Amount Not to Exceed• ,..$27,225 Contractor Bid $24,750 Contingency (10%) 2,470 Not to Exceed $27,225 TREE TRIMMING: FUNDING SOURCE: GENERAL FUND Budgeted Amount Parks Division FY 89-90 $ 2,860 Budgeted Amount CIP 89-146 (Median Upgrade) 1,980 $ 4,840 Contract Amount Not to Exceed: Contractor Bid $ 4,400 Contingency (10%) 440 Not to exceed $ 4,840 Alternatives: Alternatives available to City Council: 1. Reject the low bidder. 2. Rebid the project. 3. Drop the projects. Respectfully Su•mitted erelyn%anole Administrative Aide Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: Lynn A. Terry, P.E. Deputy City Engineer Michael Flaherty Parks Division, P. yV. Dept. evin B. North raft City Manager cc: Mary Rooney, Director of Community Resources Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission Hermosa Beach School District March 21, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 27, 1990 Street Lighting and Crossing Guard Assessment Districts Report on Charges Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. Background At the meeting of March 13, 1990, the Council requested a report on charges to the Lighting and Crossing Guard District. A recap of the budgeted charges for 1989-90 is attached. Analysis The cost allocation plan being prepared by DMG and Associates (in conjunction with the user fee study) will determine the actual cost associated with the assessment districts. The administration costs currently budgeted are a flat amount and are very low. Noted: 'kevin B. North raft City Manager Viki Copeland Finance Director if Street Lighting District Budget 1989-90 Street Lighting Division, Operating Costs Salaries and Benefits Contract Services (Assessment engineer, traffic signal maintenance - CALTRANS Materials, supplies, utilities Vehicle used 1/2 ton pickup) Capital Improvement Projects CIP 102, CIP 201, CIP 202, Widen Highland Avenue Light Conversions/ New Installations Hermosa Avenue/Pier Avenue Lighting Administration $103,796 23,650 201,038 2,000 $330,484 $ 7,775 30,000 2,000 $ 39,775 4,500 $374,759 % of total 28% 6% 54% 1% 89% 10% 1% Crossing Guard District Budget 1989-90 Crossing Guard District, % of total Operating Costs Salaries and Benefits $50,583 77% (Crossing Guards, $33,321, 51% of total) Contract Services 8,900 14% Materials, Supplies 1,814 2% $61,297 93% Administration $ 4,500 $65,797 7% March 21, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of March 27, 1990 REPORT ON CURRENT TAPE RETENTION POLICY OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report on audio recording retention of Hermosa Beach City Council meetings. Background: At the February 27, 1990 City Council meeting, the Mayor directed staff to prepare a report on current tape retention of City Coun- cil meetings and the cost of retaining more than six months. Analysis: The current Resolution (Res.#88-5160) provides for the recycling of tapes used to record the meetings of the City Council 180 days (6 months) after the occurrence of the event recorded. The current resolution was adopted to alleviate the expense associated with continually having to purchase tapes. Also, lack of sufficient storage space indicated that the retention policy was necessary. Council Meetings are currently being recorded at a cost per meet- ing of approximately $3.84 ($1.28 per tape). Lack of sufficient storage space will become more problematic if tapes are retained for longer or unspecified periods. Rarely, are there requests for duplication of City Council Meet- ings from citizens or other interested parties. Citizens who do request an opportunity to listen to a tape are most always inter- ested in a recently past Council Meetings. This indicates that recycling after 180 days is appropriate. A telephone survey was conducted of area cities to find out their procedures on audio recording retention of City Council Meetings. The cities surveyed regard the tapes solely as an aid in prepara- tion of minutes, with the exception of those matters deemed by the city attorney to be retained, the results of the survey are: CITY RECYCLING PERIOD 1. El Segundo 2. Hawthorne 3. Lawndale 4. Lomita 5. Los Angeles 6. Palos Verdes 7. Torrance 8. Redondo Beach Concur: after after after after after after after after 2 years 90 days 1.5 years 6 months minutes are 3 months minutes are 2 years AVERAGE /167-et./6241/-141-7 Elaine Doerfling City Clerk *Kevin B. ort ra t City Manager MONTHS KEPT 24 3 18 6 approved approved eggy wuann Municipal Intern 1 3 1 24 10 months CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Michael Schubach, Pla SUBJECT: Commercial Corridor Citywide DATE: March 27, 1990 and Precise or Development Plan Coincidentally, the text amendment for Precise Development Plan and the Commercial Specific Plan Area along the highway are being heard at the same time. These two text amendments have similar requirements for developments. However, there are significant differences which would cause great difficulty if these items were discussed jointly. The Specific Plan Area is a completely comprehensive entity relating to a specific geographical area, whereas the Precise Development Plan is a general overlay which enhances minimum standards imposed through various zones in all parts of the city. Note that these two ordinances are not in conflict for the noted factors, i.e. one is for a specific geographical area and the other is citywide. To discuss these matters together would cause great difficulty; however if specific standards'found within the Precise Development Plan or vice versa within the Specific Plan Area that would be desirable to include in one or the other of the proposed ordinances, a councilmember may motion to do so. However, significant changes made to either ordinance will result in referral back to the Planning Commission unless it is determined that the Planning Commission had discussed that particular item previously. Also, staff would warn that it may not make sense to propose the same standard in both ordinances. Recommendation Hold two separate public hearings. Concur: ithltiAAWae-a& Robert A. Blackwood Acting City Manager SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 54'6 March 19, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council March 27, 1990 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 89-9 LOCATION: COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AREAS ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, BETWEEN EIGHTH STREET AND THE SOUTH CITY BOUNDARY INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO REZONE SAID AREAS FROM C-3, R-1, R-2, R-3, R -P AND SPA -2 (MOSTLY C-3) TO A COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE RECENTLY AMENDED LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN Recommendation The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the areas designated Commercial Corridor on the General Plan, located south of 8th Street, be rezoned from their current zoning classifications to Commercial Specific Plan Area by the adoption of the attached ordinance. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of 2/20/90 recommended adoption of theproposed zone change and creation of Specific Plan Area No. 7 through the adoption of Resolution P.C. 90-8. It should be emphasized that this zone change is the fourth of five steps that has been necessary to implement the General Plan Amendments adopted by the City Council on 5/9/89 which established the boundaries of the Commercial Corridor. These General Plan amendments were the culmination of much deliberation including four public hearings. The Council has completed the zone changes for the three residential segments (south, northwest, and northeast) located adjacent to the Commercial Corridor. The final step will be the zone changes for the northern portion of the Commercial Corridor. The proposed Specific Plan Area is consistent with the policies adopted as part of the Land Use Element of the General Plan as expressed in Resolution 89-5270. Interim Ordinance No. 89-1004 which established a moratorium on the issuance of building permits in the Multi -Use Corridor, and which still applies only to the Commercial Corridor designated areas fronting on Pacific Coast Highway, expires on August 1990. Adoption of the proposed ordinance will remove the southern portion of the Commercial Corridor from the moratorium. 1 Please refer to the attached summary report prepared for the 2/15/90 joint Planning Commission and City Council meeting for further background and a chronology of the actions taken on the Pacific Coast Highway corridor. Analysis The Planning Commission heard testimony and discussed the provisions of the proposed commercial Specific Plan Area over the course of two public meetings which .resulted in the proposed ordinance. The recommended S.P.A. ordinance would establish a set of reasonable "first tier" development standards related to building height, bulk, total size, and landscape coverage. When in compliance with the standards a developer could obtain a building permit without any discretionary approval or environmental review. First tier standards can be waived, however, through approval of a Precise Development Plan. This would require environmental review and be subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. To approve a project which exceeds the first tier standards the Planning. Commission must make specific findings:. that the project is consistent with the guidelines for waiving first tier standards. The S.P.A. also includes "second tier" standards for which there must be compliance in all cases. The recommended standards are as follows: First Tier: Second Tier: Height (max.): East of P.C.H.: 30 feet 40 feet West of P.C.H.: 35 feet 45 feet Bulk (max.): 1.0 F.A.R.* none Gross Floor Area: 10,000 sq. ft. none Landscaping Coverage: 5% of lot area 2°h of lot area *Gross Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio (excludes parking structures) Also, the following would apply in all circumstances as minimum standards: Landscaping Min. 3' wide planter strips with Specifications: raised 6" curbing, or an area equivalent 2 in size, along street frontage, 5 -gallon shrub for each 20 sq. ft. Setback from R -zone: 8 feet plus 2 feet for each add'l story Buffering from R -zone: Min. 5' wide planter strip with 24-inch/15 gallon tree every 10 feet An important element of the proposed Specific Plan Area is the specific guidelines which the Planning Commission must follow in making a determination of whether or not a project can go beyond first tier standards. These guidelines require the Planning Commission to make a finding that the project is of a superior quality and appropriate for the site, and that any first tier standard which is exceeded is compensated for, or mitigated, by other features in the design. These guidelines are located in pages 8 through 11 of the ordinance. The permitted commercial uses within Specific. Plan Area No. 7 are proposed to be the same as permitted within the C-3 zone. The Planning Commission and staff did not find any reason to restrict the uses any further than currently allowed in the General Commercial zone. First, the frontage lots along the Highway are the most appropriate location for general commercial uses, and secondly, allowing a range of options would allow developers the flexibility to respond to changes in the market. The permitted uses, however, do include existing residential structures, and the reconstruction or rehabilitation thereof, as long as density does not increase. This provision carries out one of the policies adopted in the General Plan. Please refer to the attached proposed ordinance for the detailed provisions of the S.P.A. and the guidelines and criteria for review of Precise Development Plans. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff reports and minutes for further background and ana�ys,is. CONC. Michael Schu•ach Planning Director Attachments 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. Maps 3. Resolution 89-5270 4. Summary of MUC report 5. P.C. Minutes, Staff Reports 2/20/90, 1/16/90 6. Correspondence 7. Public Notice Affidavit /Ken Robe tson, Ass c. Planner Kevin Northcv4ft City Manager CITY MANAGER COMMENT: I have directed staff to develop a clear explanation of floor area ratio computa- tion to avoid conflicting figures. 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 90 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO CREATE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 7., FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on March 27, 1990, to receive public testimony regarding Zone Change 89-9, the establishment of a specific plan area zone in the Commercial Corridor area located south of 8th Street, and made the following findings: A. A specific plan area zone will implement the policies contained in resolution 89-5270 adopted by the City, Council, by establishing standards more restrictive than the C-3 zone to regulate commercial development to ensure compatibility with adjacent residential areas along Pacific Coast Highway, and bring the zoning into consistency with the General Plan; B. The height limits will lessen the potential view impact of commercial development; C. Landscaping requirements will improve the buffering of commercial development from residential uses, buffering residents from noise and visual impacts, and will contribute towards the improving the appearance of commercial projects; D. The review of individualprojects for compliance with .the standards contained in the specific plan area, and for the purpose of considering the view impact of individual projects by the Planning Commission will serve to further ensure that commercial development will not be incompatible with existing residential neighborhoods; E. The rezoning to specific plan areas will result in a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 development character for the subject areas which is appropriate for the surroundings; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the zoning map and the zoning ordinance text be amended as shown on the attached map and described as follows: SECTION 1. Rezone the Commercial Corridor General Plan designated area located on the east and west side of Pacific Coast Highway north of the south city boundary and south of Eighth Street to Specific Plan Area No. 7, legally described as follows: Eastside: Westside: South City Boundary-lst Street: Lot 1-7 Trafton Heights Tract lst-2nd St.: Lots 45-51 Trafton Heights Tract, Lots 41-46 of Homebuilders Place 2nd -3rd St: Lots 1-4 of Homebuilders Place, Lots 2, 4 of the Mission Tract 3rd -4th St.: Lots 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 of Mission Tract; Westerly 12' of Lot 12, and Lots 13, 14, 15 of Hurd's Ocean View Tract 4th -5th St.: Lots 1, 2, Portion of lot 3 of Hurd's Ocean View Tract, Lots 17-23 of Garden View Tract 5th -6th st.: Lots 1-5 of Tract #294, Westerly 40' of Lots 11-13, and Lots 14-16 of Camino Real Tract 6th -7th St.: 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract, Block 85, portion of lot 7 (Westerly 121.8'); Lots 17-19 of Wilson & Lind's Tract 7th -8th St.: Lots 14-16 Wilson and Lind's Tract 6th -8th St.: Lots 1-4 of Redondo Hermosa Tract; Lots 28, Block 78, 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach, portion of Lots 1-3, Lots 4-9 of Tract #8525 5th -6th St.: Portion of Lots 24, 25, Block 78, 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract 4th -5th St.: Lots 1-4 of Koepke's Tract, Lots 1-5 of Thorne's Hillside #2 3rd -4th St.: Portion of Lots 23-28. lots 29, 56, 57, of Walter Ransom Co.'s Venable Place Tract 2nd -3rd St.: Portion of Lots 38-63, Lots 64, 65, 88 and 89 & Easterly 10' of lot 87 Walter Ransom Co.'s Venable Place Tract -5-- 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 lst-2nd St.: Portion of Lots 90-95 of Walter Ransom Co.'s Venable Place Tract & Lots 96-99, 118-119, portion or Lots 1-6; Lots 7, 8 of Tract #5019, Lot 142 of Walter Ransom Co.'s Venable Place Tract lst-So.City Bdry: Lots 143-145 of Walter Ransom Co.'s Venable Place Tract; SECTION 2. The following text shall be added to the zoning ordinance: Article 9.7, Chapter 7, Specific Plan Area No. 7 Section 9.67-1. Authority. This Specific Plan Area is an, instrument for implementing the General plan pursuant to Article 8, Chapter 3, of the State of California Planning and Zoning Law (California Government Code Section 65450 et. Seq.) Section 9.67-2 Location and Description. The subject area is located on the east and west side of Pacific Coast Highway and is designated as Commercial Corridor on the Official General Plan Map. Section 9.67-3 Purpose. The purpose of the Specific Plan Area is to set forth the development requirements, standards and permitted uses for the subject area, and to carry out the policies of the Commercial Corridor General Plan area as stated in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Section 9.67-4 Permitted Uses. A. Commercial permitted uses shall be the same as those permitted in C-3 General Commercial Zone as contained in Section 8-4 of the City of Hermosa 'Beach zoning ordinance, and nonconforming uses shall be subject to the provisions of Article 13, Nonconforming Building and Uses of the zoning ordinance. B. A property being exclusively used for residential purposes at the date of the adoption of this ordinance shall be permitted to be continued as a residential use, maintaining its conforming status, and may be remodeled or redeveloped as a residential use as long as the density (number of dwelling units) is not increased. C. Residentially developed properties or vacant properties can only be converted to commercial uses if the property fronts on Pacific Coast Highway or is an assemblage of properties which front on Pacific Coast Highway. D. Properties with existing commercial uses or other than residential uses which do not front on Pacific Coast 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Highway may be used commercially, expanded, and/or remodeled, if the existing access is maintained. E. Any residential use which shares a lot or parcel with a commercial use shall be considered a nonconforming use and subject to Article 13 of the zoning ordinance. Section 9.67-5 Residential Development Standards A. In respect to height, yard, setback, open space, and dimensional requirements, any residential project whether new or a remodel of an existing structure shall be subject to the provisions contained in the zoning ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach, depending on the applicable zoning district. The applicable residential zoning district shall be determined based on the nearest residential zoning district on the same block. Section 9.67-6 Commercial Development Standards A. Purpose and Intent. The standards and guidelines are designed to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Hermosa Beach and to encourage the development of high quality commercial development along Pacific Coast Highway in respect to its impact on residential projects, environmental impacts, circulation, and appearance. B. Standards. Two sets of standards apply in this specifi plan area, First Tier and Second Tier. Compliance wi h• First Tier standards allows the project to proceed ' al co_ building permit. If a project goes beyond any'of the first trier standards the procedure for submittal and approval of a Precise Development Plan shall be followed. Developments must be in compliance with Second Tier standards at all times. Project sponsors are encouraged to discuss preliminary plans of proposed projects with the Planning Department before making any formal applications for building permits or Precise Development Plans. First Tier Second Tier Maximum/Minimum Maximum/Minimum Requirements Requirements 1. Maximum Height: 4 East of P.C.H.- 30 feet feet West of P.C.H. ?feet feet 2. Bulk: Max. 1.0 F.A.R.* none *Gross Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio (excludes parking structures) 3. Maximum Size: 10,000 sq. ft. none Gross Floor Area -7 - 4. Min. Landscape Coverage: 5% of lot area (The required landscape buffer residential zones shall not calculation) 270 of lot area between commercial and be included in this C. Requirements. The following requirements apply yo all proposed projects: ,� 1. Landscaping Specifications A minimum three (3) foot wide planter strip with raised 6" curbing, or an area equivalent in size to a 3 -foot wide planter strip along the front of the lot, shall be provided along §treet frontage. A 5 -gallon shrub sha11 berovided for each 20 sq. ft. 2. Setback from Residentially Zoned Property: A minimum of eight (8) feet plus two (2) feet for each additional story. 3. Landscaping Buffer from the Residential Zone: A Minimum five (5) foot wide planter strip landscaped with.a minimum of one 24 -inch or 15 -gallon size specimen tree provided for every 10 feet of length. 4. Six (6) inch high raised concrete curbing shall be provided along the perimeter of all landscaped areas except on the side abutting building walls, or fences. 5. The development, including the landscaping and the entire property grounds, shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner. 6. All other development standards shall be governed by the City of Hermosa Beach Zoning Ordinance, including, but not limited to Article 8, Commercial Zones, and Article 11.5, Off -Street Parking.. ),0s/�,/.L,` Section 9.67-6. Precise Development Plan. A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to set forth the procedures and guidelines for review of Precise Development Plans, which are required when a proposed project exceeds any one of the First Tier standards. B. Guidelines for Planning Commission review 1. General Guidelines: To allow projects which exceed any of the first tier standards, the overall building and project design, should be of a superior -S- quality, be compatible with surrounding properties, and be designed in scale with the community. The Planning Commission shall consider the following in making this determination: a. The building should be designed with interesting architectural features and materials to enhance the overall project. A three-dimensionsal quality should be emphasized by the use of stepping architectural features to avoid massive flat building faces. Special attention should be given to the appearance of the building from the street. b. Landscaping should be utilized throughout the site in a manner which enhances the building and the site, and to mitigate the visual impacts of any flat and/or massive parts of the building. c. The project should be compatible with neighboring projects with respect to height, scale, bulk, proportion. This is not a prescription for similar architectural styles, although in some cases it may be desirable, nor a prescriptionlfQr._..exisz_i.ng--mrdaioc-rity, as many existing buildings do(not stand scrutiny under these guidelines. -I.L> „A,..-k_i -...,/,cAi V, ) d. Architectural renderingsand perspectives must be submitted to show, the three dimensional quality of the proposed building(s). 2. Height. To allow projects to exceed the first tier height limits the building design should incorporate features to minimize and break-up the visual impact and view impacts of the higher structures on neighboring . residential areas and on the streetscape. The Planning Commission shall consider the following guidelines in making this determination: a. Limit lot coverage of uppermost level: The area of the portion of the structure which exceeds the first tier height limit should not cover a major portion of the lot area, and said over -height area should be compensated by a proportional area of the building which is at or less than the height limit. b. Flat roofs and flatvertical walls should be avoided: Stepped, variable, or sloping roofs should be encouraged. The appearance of flat roofs and massive flat vertical walls should be avoided through the use of stepping or tiered architectural features. c. Greater setbacks for upper levels: Progressing from the first floor to the uppermost story of the building setbacks from the rear property line should increase and exceed minimum -9- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 requirements, and the upper stories shall have tiered setbacks from the lower levels as viewed from the front. 3. Bulk. To allow projects which exceed the maximum Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio (F.A.R.) the building design should incorporate features to minimize the appearance of bulk, and to compensate for the bulk of a building with attractive architectural features which enhance the building and which reduce the visual impact of large areas of flat vertical walls. The Planning Commission shall consider the following guidelines in making this determination: a. Avoid "box -like" structures: Si,grificant and attractive architectural features should be used to break up the bulky appearance of "box -like" structures. b. Building step -backs: Step-ins and Step -outs should be used on the front of the building to break up the bulky appearance. This could accompany varying widths of the landscape planter area in the front of the building. c. Variable heights: The roof -line of the building should should be designed with variable heights, and roof patterns or materials, to avoid the appearance of a flat building.. 4. Landscaping. The objective of the landscaping requirement is to enhance the overall project including the streetscape, to complement the building design, to break up the impact of vast expanses of pavement, to buffer sound and visual impacts on neighboring residential areas, to provide shade for parking areas and to deflect direct sunlight into the interior of buildings. To allow less than the minimum 5% coverage, a landscaping plan must compensate for the loss of coverage by providing a superior design through: the use of types, quantity, and location of plant materials to achieve the objectives described above. B. General Criteria. In considering the Precise Development Plan for any development, the following criteria for granting or conditionally granting said permit shall be considered: 1. Distance from existing residential uses in relation to negative effects. 2. Impact on ocean views from residential areas 3. The amount of existing or proposed off-street parking in relation to actual need. 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. The combination of uses proposed, as they relate to compatibility. 5. The relationship of the estimated generated traffic volume and the capacity and safety of streets serving the area. 6. The proposed exterior signs and decor, and the compatibility thereof with existing establishments in the area. 7. Building and driveway orientation in relation to sensitive uses, e.g., residences and schools. 8. Noise, odor, dust and/or vibration that may be generated by the proposed use. 9. Impact of the proposed use to the city's infrastructure, and/or services. 10. Adequacy of mitigation measures to minimize environmental impacts in quantitative terms. 11. Other considerations that, in the judgment of the Planning Commission, are necessary to assure compatibility with the surrounding uses, and the city as a whole. C. Criteria for denial. 1. The proposed development would substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity or interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in such area, because of excessive dissimilarity or inappropriateness of design in relation to the surrounding vicinity, and there are no known conditions of approval which can be imposed that could resolve such problems. 2. The proposed development would have significant;: environmental adverse impacts which can not be mitigated, and where the finding of overriding considerations cannot be made. D. The decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by filing a written appeal within ten (10) days of the Planning Commission's decision. E. An approved Plan shall be valid for a one (1) year period and, should development fail to commence within such time limitation and no extension is granted, shall become null and void. F. No person shall violate or fail to comply with any approved plan or any condition or provision thereof, nor shall a building permit be issued for any building or structure which would violate or fail to comply with an approved Plan. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G. General Procedures and submittal requirements. 1. Application for Precise Development Plan review shall be filed and approval given prior to the issuance of, building permits. 2. Applications shall include detailed and fully dimensioned site plans, building plans, floor plans, architectural drawings and elevations including perspective drawings to exhibit the required three-dimensional features, landscape plans and/or any other data found ,to be reasonably required', 3. Applications shall be submitted t6: the City Planning Department and shall be incompliance with the department's specific requirement's. 4. Fees for submittals shall be set by policy of the City Council. SECTION 3. Amend Ordinance No. 89-1004 regarding the moratorium on the issuance of building permits for the Multi -Use Corridor to exclude the above described properties rezoned by this ordinance. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 5. The City Council shall designate the City Attorney to prepare a summary of this ordinance to be published pursuant to Government Code Section 36933(c) (1) in lieu of the full text of said ordinance. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage andadoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1990. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED040.44_,A( AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK Ile CITY ATTORNEY -%2- LD LD w 4-84 LD DRIVE _ u LD GC PACIFIC GC LiJ u 0. MD MD Mp 0 'GC _ 1 W HD BARD ST Cc MD Hn _ 4ENTR1' ),t N PARK OS LD MD PINE ST MD co.*NC V. HD 4 CC COAST N L LD AVE OCEAN LD SUBJECT AREA MD GENERAL PLAN MAP SOUTH PORTION CURRENT PINE R -2B R-2 3.1 .2 RE PAclr c C-3 2 RR --2 41, R-2 R-2 u J x •. x �_ R-2 x W b COAST M1SMWAV ; C-3; R-2 4/1 T SUBJECT AREA: • TO BE CONSIDERED FOR ZONE CHANGE TO COMMERCIAL S.P.A. . R-3 10 ZONING MAP 1 - SOUTH PORTION CURRENT SE St. Address Lot Use South City BoundarSize' to 1st St. Approx. Dist. Dist. Similar Use Current Use Date Cond. from from Adjacent Across Slope Zone Con. Const. PCH .ECB* Uses Street Ing Corner PCH/lst St. 45750 Com/Auto 60's Fair 0-158 - Res/E Comm. Flat C-3 824 1st St. • 5560 Com/Off. 1979 Good 158-198 Yes Comm. Flat C-3 828 1st St. 5560 Pump Hse 1930 Fair 198-248 - Comm. Flat C-3 'IST ST. 151. 0 g24 FZ; M68•43'E. AV I 40 • et,orki R pi , 11 1 . . ?.\ - hV do S. &Va.; 7S! 76.6 (vac o:16-36) 1&05o.0 400, 40 V!f0., 40 ecos ..„4::1:4 43 42 41 u.Zo 48.9 40 BK JO • 0 ANITA • COMMERCIAL s . 40 40 39 40 40 r40 f6 40 1 40 38 A' 2 `Z-. o P. '4\4' ol .., . \IN ---...k 40b 4015 40 • o SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL El'MI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) 40 31.44 it 4 40 16 0 5 to a 17 6. ST. ica Yes No Yes 1 to 7 BLK. I 0 41 8 1;4 9 a, 40 40 40 iz•lI t 4 40, ST. It' . EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY • SE St. Address 1st St.- 2nd St. 102 P.C.H. 134 P.C.H. 142 P.C.H. 830 2nd St. 838 2nd St. 844 2nd St. Lot Size 79200 5440 6800 3600 3600 3600 Use Com/Off. Comm. Comm. SFR SFR. Com/Pkg Approx. Date Cond. Const. 30/50 Far 1938 Fair no<50 Fair no<30 Poor no<30 Fair Dist. from PCH 0-500 0-135 0-135 135-175 0 175-215 40 215-255 80 Dist. from ECB' Similar Use Adjacent Across Slope Uses Street Res/bhd Res/bhd Res/bhd Com/W/S Com/E/S Res/E/W Current Zone Comm. Flat C -3/R -P Comm. Flat C-3 Comm. Flat C-3 Comm. Flat R -1C SFR Flat R -1C SFR Flat C-3 0 2ND ;S'30 133• • 1S44 90 14-2 kt*,,. Fph, i J1 1 134 . - ii%.4.4k,Piri 0/4/, . t.. , t ' 4. w i 0 . . , --„, 77„,,,,.. A, _ A .4,25, 14 u 7 , ./ ifiiir i fi vr ref/ pr g.ffirrr; All"; II 1 hVkiikk;:. Y St7 lb 2-- iffiliffrr 114/:, * AA sitf/ AA IST. D D ST. , . . o . o Use Conf' ing? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY . COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY SE • St. Address Lot 2nd St.- 3rd St. Size Use Approx. Date Cond. Const. Dist. from PCH Dist. from ECB* Similar Use Adjacent Across Slope Uses Street Current Use Zone Con ing NS 2nd St. 210 P.C.H. 13960 Com/Auto 45/81 Fair 0-160 Res/bad Comm. Flat C-3 Yes 835 2nd St. 3630 SFR 1976 Good 160-200 0 Com/W. SFR Flat R -1C Yes 845 2nd St. 3630 SFR 1976 Good 200-240 40 Yes Comm. Flat R -1C Yes SS 3rd St. 246 P.C.H. 2250 Comm. 1926 Fair 0-50 Res/bhd Comm. Flat C-3 Yes 252 P.C.H. 2250 Comm. 1926 Fair 0-50 - Res/bhd Comm. Flat C-3 Yes 814 3rd St. 2230 SFR 1977 Fair 50-75 0 Yes Comm. Flat R -1C Yes 820 3rd St.. 2230 SFR 1976 Fair 75-100 25 Yes Comm. Flat R -1C Yes 824 3rd St. 2230 SFR 1976 Fair 100-125 50 Yes Comm. Flat R -1C Yes 832 3rd St. 2230 SFR 1984 Good 125-150 75 Yes SFR Flat R -1C Yes 834 3rd St. 2230 SFR 1984 Good 150-175 100 Yes SFR Flat R -1C Yes 840 3rd St. 2230 SFR 1973 Fair 175-200 125 Yes SFR Flat R -1C Yes 844 3rd St. 2230 SFR 1973 Fair 200-225 150 Yes SFR Flat R -1C Yes 902 3rd St. 2230 SFR Fair 225-250 175 Yes SFR Flat R' -1C Yes 100 /8 ; 3RD • N.6843. 25 101/5 25" IJOi•'� ,,,10...• 1 45 70,4, J. ST .Z C r11 Z Cr 1.210,,11,230.0' 1,710c•'ttfpt.. ?210•" no, .4. 1,1l0�"• Io oy so ?3 O 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 1 7 210 so •25 2.5 ,.;,, \`��\• `�� `b j\\� \;` ��I 'N.• \� :S.S��✓T ..•ti -%:•::;:;.ti+/.•:•:• 5:•:::• lY: � to10�•. ::: :: --f-,8 56645 O 8 W.•_ js 9 ® 10. 3) 11 —. ® 12 • : 13 10 14 Di 15 o2 16 1- e 35 345 ° 2 ND • COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 1WO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) _t7 - EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY BOUNDARY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA SE • Approx. Dist. Dist. Similar Use Current Use St. Address Lot Use Date Cond.from from Adjacent Across Slope Zone Conform - 3rd to 4th size Const. PCH ECB+ Uses Street ing? / NS 3rd St. 300 P.C.H. 21600 Comm. 40/84 Fair 0-125 - Res.bad Com/Res. Flat C-3 Yes 819 3rd St. 2250 SFR 1958 Fair 125-150 0 Comm./W. SFRFlat_'``}' R -1C Yes 821 3rd St. 2250 SFR 1946 Fair 150-175 25 Yes SFR Flat R -1C Yes 829 3rd St. 2250 SFR 1970 Fair 175-200 50 Yes SFR Flat R -1C Yes 843 3rd St. 2250 SFR 1963 Fair 200-225 75 Yes SFRFlat R -1C Yes 847 3rd St. 2250 SFR 1963 Fair 225-250 100 Yes SFR Flat R -1C Yes SS 4th St. - 344 P.C.H. 8560 Comm. 1960 Fair 0-70 Res.bhd Comm. Flat C-3 Yes 820 4th St. 3400 SFR n<61 Poor 70-112 0 Comm./W. Comm. Flat C-3 No 822 4th St. 3390 2 Un. <1927 Poor 112-148 42 Yes SFR Flat R -1C Yes 832 4th St. 4250 SFR <1947 Fair 148-196 78 Yes SFR Flat R -1C Yes 836 4th St. 3940 SFR 1923 Fair 196-244 126 Yes SFR Flat R -1C Yes 5g 3RD ST. 811 4j88 3R0 COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) • S - EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY BOUNDARY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA SE Approx.Dist. Dist. imilar Use Current Us St. Address Lot Use Date Cond. from from Adjacent Across Slope Zone Co . 4th St.- 5th St. Size Const. PCH ECB* Uses Street in . Along P.C.H. q SIO 400 P.C.H. 1-1.91B9 Comm. 1970 Fair 0-116 - Res/bhd Comm. Flat C-3 Ye 422 P.C.H. 4350 Comm. 1960 Fair 0-116 - Res/bhd N/A Flat C-3 Ye. 428 P.C.H. 4350 . Comm. 1940 Fair 0-116 Res/bhd N/A Flat C-3 Ye. 430 P.C.H. 4350 Comm. 1962 Fair 0-116 - Res/bhd N/A Flat C-3 Ye. 440 P.C.H. 4350 Comm. 1946 Fair 0-116 Res/bhd N/A Flat C-3 Ye: 0f. 442 P.C.H. / e3lie Comm. 1982 Fair 0-116 - Res/bhd Comm. Flat C-3 Ye: W. side Ocean View 835 4th St. 4080 SFR 1941 Fair 148-196 48 Com/W/alley SFR Mod. R -1C Ye: 845 4th St. 4080 SFR <1944 Fair 196-244 96 Yes SFR Mod. R -1C Ye: 417 Ocean View 8700 3Units 1942 Fair 128-244 12 Com/W. SFR Mod. R -1C Ye: 429 Ocean View 5340 SFR n<45 Fair 128-244 12 Com/W. SFR Mod. R -1C Ye: 431 Ocean View 5340 SFR 1926 Fair 128-244 12 Com/W. SFR Mod. R -1C Yec 834 5th St. 6525 SFR 1922 Fair 128-244 12 Com/W. MFR Mod. R -.1C Nc 826 5th St. 2175 SFR no rec Fair 128-186 12 Com/W. Comm. Mod. R -1C Yes 59 QK 4/8a 4TH ST. r4 E 9° O 44.0 43O 4z 4z2. 4co 90 0 5Th to • • S 76'31W • 151.6 Nr 4TH • $35 $¢5 ST. °v COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) 40 z9 4i7w z LI U 0 eo EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY A° i re i... • • iffiffiR'-HI . . .•:, Ay. 1.0.:,;-:....-9 ,,,,A. AMU- - s ... „ri,.., 'WY. /ire cri. . . 4:7! , ,;•ff��iii: M1{i �v li}}diiF,.r;::K!1 f `` l.i ii jCj:>.)v{:H ilti:iti2 r, Akar r " .." if ;:ti`:�:ti is?yi:i:!�i: lsT.•::�.y: SiSF; riii: :}ii^. J , or 3:::::te.:;: • Nr 4TH • $35 $¢5 ST. °v COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) 40 z9 4i7w z LI U 0 eo EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY SE Approx. Dist. St. Address Lot Use Date Cond. from 5th St.- 6th St. Size Const. PCH SS 5th St. 504 P.C.H. 15000 Comm. 1984 Gdod 0-160 518 P.C.H. '51525 Vac/Com. 1946 Fair 0-120 j '':Ji:., ;' 530 P.C.H. -6'25 Comm. 1922 Fair 0-120 833 5th St. 13500 10UApt. 1988 Good 160-250 NS 5th St. (536 P.C.H. 4440 Com/Res bhd 1922 Fr/Pr 0-120 544 P.C.H. P' l 4440 Com/Res bhd 1922 Pr/Pr 0-120 588 P.C.H.• L 4440 Com/Res bhd <1955 Fr/Pr 0-120 822 6th St. 4400 SFR 1937 Poor 120-160 541 Gravely Ct. 2960 SFR 1952 Fair 160-240 544 Gravely Ct. 2960 SFR 1924 Fair 160-240 549 Gravely Ct. 2960 SFR 1952 Fair 160-240 STH ST. Dist. Similar Use Current Use from Adjacent Across Slope Zone Conf ECB' Uses Street ing? Yes Comm. Flat C-3 Yes - Yes Flat C-3 Yes - Yes Flat C-3 Yes 0 Com/W/SFR/N SFR Mod. R-3 Yes - SFR/bhd Mod. C-3 No - SFR/bhd - Mod. C-3 No - SFR/bhd Comm. Mod. C-3 No 0 Yes 2FR Mod. R -2C Yes 40 MFR/S. - Mod. R -2C Yes 40 Yes Mod. R -2C Yes 40 Yes SFR Mod. R -1C Yes a COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY SE Approx. Dist. Dist. Similar Use Current ' Use St. Address Lot Use Date Cond. from from Adjacent Across Slope Zone Con: NS 7th St. • Size Const. PCH ECB• Uses Street nB. 700 P.C.H. 14400 Com/Auto <1960 Fair 0-120 Res/bad Comm. Mod. C-3 Yes 821, 825 7th St. 4800 3UCon. 1977 Fair 120-160 0 Com/W. 2FR Mod. R -2C No 829 7th St. 4800 2Units 1961 Fair 160-200 40 Yes SFR Mod. R -2C • Yes 839 7th St. 4800 2Units 1924 Fair 200-240 80 Yes MFR Mod. R -2C Yes 7 1 4 NJ ti • i'22 /3a • $2g, 829 X539 •SZS 7 TH O 10 ti 0 b 0 0 8 N. 76 ,34'E. 13 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 ST. COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BOUNDARY (three or more units) - 2/ - COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA .•SW Approx. Dist. Dist. Similar Use Current Use St. Address Lot Use Date Cond. from from Adjacent Across Slope Zone ;Conf 8th St.- 6th St. Size Const. PCH ECB* Uses Street ing' SS 8th St. / 720 8th St. 5020 SFR 1923 Fair 122-188 0 Comm/E. SFR Flat R -2C Yes 710 8th St. 5020 411Apt. 1986 Good 188-254 66 Yes SFR Flat R -2C No 704 8th St. 2510 Dup. 1958 Good 254-287 122 Yes SFR Flat R -2C Yes Along P.C.H. 729 P.C.H. 9270 Comm. 1948 Fair 0-122 Res/bhd Com/SFR Flat C-3 Yes 705 P.C.H. 37150 Com.Res. 1940 Fr/Pr 0-290 - Res/bhd - Flat C-3 Yes 635 P.C.H. • 37150 Comm. 1930 Fair 0-290 - Res/bhd - Flat C-3 Yes 619 P.C.H. 3150 Auto/Com 1940 Fair 0-90 - Yes Flat C-3 Yes 601 P.C.H. 6570 Comm.. 1973 Fair 0-90 - Yes Comm. Flat C-3 Yes NS 6th St. 725 6th St. 5880 Comm. Pkg lot Fair 110-170 - Yes Comm. Flat C-3 Yes 723 6th St. 2940 Comm. Pkg lot Fair 170-200 - Res/bhd Comm. Flat SPA -2 Yes 721 6th St. 2940 2U/det. 1927 • Poor 200-230 0 Com/E/N Comm. Mod. SPA -2 Yes 709 6th St. 2940 SFR 1958 Fair 230-260 30 Com/ Comm. Mod. R -P Yes 707 6th St. 2940 2U/det. 1959 Fair 260-290 60 Com/ Comm. Mod. R -P Yes J 8TH EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY •••• - COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY rol COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDEN'1'IAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) _ • kb% 761 .721 723. 72S ST: • a• SE Approx. Dist. Dist. Similar Use Current Us( St. Address Lot Use Date Cond. from from Adjacent Across Slope Zone Cor 6th St.- 8th St. Size Const. PCH ECB" Uses Street in4 NS 6th St. 600 P.C.H. 12100 Com/Auto 1978 Fa,tr 0-122 -Mod. Comm. Mod. C-3 Ye: 620 P.C.H. 9600 Com/Auto 1965 Fair 0-122 - Res/bad Mod. C-3 Ye: 817 6th St. 7275 2Units 1946 Fair 122-170 0 Com/W/MFR/E SFR Mod. R -2C Ye: 831 6th St. 8400 6UCon. 1982 Good 170-226 48 SFR/N SFR Mod. R -2C Nc SS 7th St. 638 P.C.H. 6000 Comm. <1950 Fair 0-120 - 2FR/bad Mod. C-3 Yes 650 P.C.H./ 814 6th St.. 4800 Com/SFR bad 45/32 Fr/Fr 120-160 - SFR/badComm. Mod. C-3 Nc 824 7th St. 4800 2Unit 1958 Poor 120-160 0 Com/W. MFR Mod. R -2C Yes 832 7th St. 4800 SFR 1928 Fair 160-200 40 MFR/E. 2FR Mod. R -2C Yes 840 7th St. 4800 4UApt. 1987 Good 200-240 80 MFR/E. 2FR Mod. R -2C No 7TH • el4: 4 '3? s4o1 ST. COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 1WO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) >. •UJ7 VI -23- ST. EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY .•••••• COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY SW St. Address Lot 6th St.- 4th St. Size Between 6th -5th 501 P.C.H. 715 5th St. 3 I 7 Use Approx. Date Cond. Const. 48490 Com/Auto 1950 Poor 16200 Com/Auto 1977 Fair Dist. Dist. from from PCH ECB' 0-290 0-290 BK. 4187 Similar Use Adjacent Across Slope Uses Street Current Zone Use Conf ing? Res/bhd Com/Res Flat C-3 Yes. Res/bhd MFR Flat C-3 Yes $ 6TH ST. g� I0ael •.''�? :/:: 23 ,f 40• I •25 - 6 26 - 27 - O 28 ® 29 /U., 30 — 2 3/ 31 Y C '� , ,a 7859R .3959 ;toot•' t/ as ••4 ® ro o 40 J.7 i9 39 ,. Id 38 . l7 37 16 38 .. /5 35 3J 34 13 33 • / P. 3Z. 32 , • /4:-41 • 71..Jt 0 rr . _ N 7:,34'E_ 5 Tli -o 1 90 50 i 90 cl _J ST. COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL • TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) - WI NE me" - EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY BOUNDARY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA SS 5th St. 429 P.C.H. 14040 Comm. 1971 Fair 0-130 - Res/bhd Comm. Flat C-3 Yes 710 - 732 5th 12870 12UApt. 1986 Fair 130-250 0 Comm/E. Comm. Flat R -3C No 706 5th St. 4320 2Units 48/76 Fair 250-290 120 Yes Comm. Mod. R -3C Yes NS 4th St. 421 P.C.H. 4250 Com/Auto 1953 Poor 0-100 Yes Flat C-3 Yes 403 P.C.H. 13600 Comm. 1945 Fair 0-140 - Res/bhd Comm. Flat C-3 Yes 731 4th St. 5120 SFR n/a<49 Fair 140-180 0 Com E/MFR N&W MFR Flat R -3C Yes 701 - 715 4th 13952 8UCon. 1979 Good 180-290 40 Yes MFR Flat R -3C Yes Approx. Dist. Dist. Similar Use Current Use Lot Use Date Cond. from from Adjacent Across Slope Zone Conf Size Const. PCH ECB' Uses Street ing? 'Existing Commercial Boundary 5TH • als4 9 14 . '34 .4' • 10 5340,•. /373.9 11 /3.97.4 6:4.711 1 39 .19 12 54 50 1 / c2) i",1 13 • 4 1 1 7 4794 \S 3mra 39 .79 • 4TH • • 8 0 04.C.7.4) 15 4 7 0 16 • h. 6 0 17 1 5 0 C160 4 0 1 19 N78•34V: • \ l'oeo Mc -13 -• 3 20 40 N 76'34Z 901- 715 :73i ST El COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) —25— EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY ' COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY ?.1 421 • . (1) N < 42.1L u C.- • (' 40 • SW St. Address 4th St.- 3th St. Lot Size Use Approx. Dist. Dist. Similar Use Date Cond. from from Adjacent Across Slope Const. PCH ECB* Uses Street Current Zone Use Conf' ing? SS 4th St. 339 P.C.H./ / 750 4th St. 4400 Comm. n/a<45 Fair 0-75 Yes Comm. Flat C-3 Yes 333 P.C.H. 4400 Comm. 1941 Fair 0-110 - Res/bhd Flat C-3 Yes 4355 Res/bhd Flat C-3 Yes 325 P.C.H. 2250 Comm. 1927 Fair 0-110 - 746 4th St. 1050 Comm. 1981 Fair 75-110 - Res/bhd Comm. Flat C-3 Yes 736 4th St. . 4600 2Units 1938 Fair 110-140 0 Comm/E. Comm. Flat C-3 No 726 4th St. 4600 3Units 1957 Fair 140-180 40 Yes SFR Flat R -3C Yes 118 4th St. 4600 2Units 1979 Fair 180-220 80 Yes MFR Flat R -3C Yes 710 4th St. 4600. SFR n/a<56 Fair 220-260 120 Yes MFR Flat R -3C Yes NS 3rd St. 307 P.C.H. 3600 Comm. 1944 Fair 0-90 - Yes Comm. Flat C-3 Yes 303 P.C.H. 7200 Com/Auto 1965 Fair 0-90 - Yes Comm. Flat C-3 Yes 737 3rd St. 11500 Comm. 1968? Fair 90-190 - Res/NSW Comm. Flat C -3/R -3C Yes 715 3rd St. 9200 8UCon. 1985 Good 190-270 100 Church/E MFR Flat R -3C Yes *Existing Commercial Boundary COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) _ D4 - EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY SW St. Address 3rd St.- 1st P1. Lot Size Use Approx. Dist. Dist. Similar Use Date Cond. from from Adjacent Across Slope Const. PCH ECB* Uses Street Current Use Zone Con ing ij SS 3rd St. 243 P.C.H./ • / 742 3rd St. 3500 Comm. 1949 Fair 0-110 - Yes Comm. Flat C-3 Yes 233 P.C.H. 2960 Comm. 1956 Fair 0-74 - Yes Flat C-3 Yes 229 P.C.H. 4000 Comm. 1939 Fair 0-100 - Yes Flat C-3 Yes Approx. 730 3rd 10820 Com/Pkg - Fair 110-190 - Res/bad Comm. Flat C-3 Yes 720 3rd St. 4600 5UApt. 1962 Fair 190-230 0 Comm/E. MFR Flat R -3C No 710 3rd St. 4600 4UApt. 1964 Fair 230-270 40 Yes MFR Flat R -3C No NS 2nd St. 217 P.C.H. 4400 Comm. 1945 Fair 0-110 - Yes - Flat C-3 Yes 211 P.C.H. 4400 Comm. 1945 Fair 0-110 Yes - Flat C-3 Yes 201 P.C.H. 4400 Com/Auto 1944 Fair 0-110 - Yes Comm. Flat C-3 Yes Approx. 725 2nd 4600 Com/Auto Car/str Fair 110-200 0 Res/W. Comm. Flat C-3 Yes .:;- 717 2nd St. 3450 SFR 1968 Fair 200-230 90 Com/E. Comm. Mod. R -3C Yes 715 2nd St. 4600 SFR <1942 Good 230-270 220 Yes SFR Mod. R -3C Yes t fn 0 U COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ElMULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY • COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY • SW Approx. Dist. Dist. Similar Use Current Use St. Address Lot Use Date Cond. from from Adjacent Across Slope Zone Conf 3rd St.- 1st P1. Size Const. PCH ECB* Uses Street. ing? Between 2nd St - 1st P1. 121 P.C.H. 48300 Com/Auto 1970 Far 0-230 Res/bad Com/Res Flat C-3 Yes 710 2nd St. 4600 2Units . 1969 Fair 230-270 0 Com/E. SFR Mod. C-3 . No 725 1st P1. 4600 abnd/SFR <1913 Poor 150-190 0 Com/E. 2FR Mod. C-3 No 719 1st P1. 4600 2Units 1954 Fair 190-230 40 Com/N. 2FR Mod. R -3C Yes 709 1st P1. 4600 2Units Poor 230-270 '80 Com/N. MFR Mod. R -3C Yes -J do 2ND ST. •o 32 33 III 112 366 40 . E El COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL . (three or more units) .—Z$ — EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY 1 0 U 2NC Lot Use 1st P1. to Size 45 P.C.H. 35000 Com/Auto 1976 Fair SS 1st Place Approx. Dist. Date Cond. from Const. PCH Dist. Similar Use from Adjacent Across Slope ECB* Uses Street Current • Use Zone Con ing 0-150 - Res/bad Comm. Flat C-3 Yes 720 1st P1. 4080 2Units 1935 Poor 150-190 0 Com/S/E Comm. Mod. R -3C Yes 718 1st P1. 4025 2Units 1927 Fair 190-230 40 Com/S. SFR Mod. R -3C Yes 710 1st P1. 4600 3Units 1939 Fair 230-270 80 Yes SFR Mod. R -3C Yes NS 1st St. 719 1st St. 5865 Com/Auto Car/str Fair 150-192 - Res/W. Comm. Mod. R -3C Yes 715 1st St. 4600 SFR 1929 Fair 190-230 - Com/E. MFR Mod. R -3C Yes I eIST 0 40' 131 Ci) Ii 133 ' a0 130 C II 134 129 1j 135 4. 128 O of A.E F. SF Ry. Spve Tiock No / Per Qd. 1719 136 • 127 137 138 125 Ci) 139 a 710 rr- zP • :1,);l 10 : iZ;z5vjfeA//.. ? C"/.14(11,1101j. 4 4,...yrifiv2ii .) 7 , <,, 0o Agit V • 1L 90,403 0. 716:711 ST.g /64 LI LI COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) 9 EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY 1 Approx. Dist. Dist. Similar Use Current U: Lot Use Date Cond. from from Adjacent Across Slope Zone Conforn Size Const. PCH ECB* Uses Street inE SS ist St 7 P.C.H 12640 Comm. 1945 Fair 0-190 - Res/bhd Comm. Flat C-3 Ye 710 1st St. 9350 8UApt. 1975 Fair 190-300 - Com/E. Com/Res Mod. R -3C Ye: • . 710 s • ----ST7-3 El E.] COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) - 3 0 - EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY 84 cKcR avND MATER/A[ 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 90-8 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO CREATE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 7, FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hear`-ings on January 16 and February 20, 1990, to receive public testimony regarding Zone Change 89-9, the establishment of specific plan area zones in the Commercial Corridor area located west of Pacific Coast Highway and south of 8th Street, and made the following findings: A. A specific plan area zone will implement the policies contained in resolution 89-5270 adopted by the City Council, by establishing standards more restrictive than the C-3 zone to regulate commercial development to ensure compatibility with adjacent residential areas along Pacific Coast Highway, and bring the zoning into consistency with the General Plan; B. The height limits will lessen the potential view impact of commercial development; C. Landscaping requirements will improve the buffering of commercial development from residential uses, buffering residents from noise and visual impacts, and will contribute towards the improving the appearance of commercial projects; D. The review of individual projects for compliance with the standards contained in the specific plan area, and for the purpose of considering the view impact of individual projects by the Planning Commission will serve to further ensure that commercial development will not be incompatible with existing residential neighborhoods; E. The rezoning to specific plan areas will result in a -3/ - 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 development character for the subject areas which is appropriate for the surroundings; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby recommend •that the zoning map be amended as shown on the attached maps and described as follows, and the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Rezone the Commercial Corridor General Plan designated area located on the east and west side of Pacific Coast Highway north of the south city boundary and south of Eighth Street to Specific Plan Area No. 7, legally described as follows: Eastside: Westside: South City Boundary-lst Street: Lot 1-7 Trafton Heights Tract lst-2nd St.: Lots 45-51 Trafton Heights Tract, Lots 41-46 of Homebuilders Place 2nd -3rd St: Lots 1-4 of Homebuilders Place, Lots 2, 4 of the Mission Tract 3rd -4th St.: Lots 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 of Mission Tract; Westerly 12` of Lot 12, and Lots 13, 14, 15 of Hurd's Ocean View Tract 4th -5th St.: Lots 1, 2, Portion of lot 3 of Hurd's Ocean View Tract, Lots 17-23 of Garden View Tract 5th -6th st.: Lots 1-5 of Tract #294, Westerly 40' of Lots 11-13, and Lots 14-16 of Camino Real Tract 6th -7th St.: 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract, Block 85, portion of lot 7 (Westerly 121.8'); Lots 17-19 of Wilson & Lind's Tract 7th -8th St.: Lots 14-16 Wilson and Lind's Tract 6th -8th St.: Lots 1-4 of Redondo Hermosa Tract; Lots 28, Block 78, 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach, portion of Lots.1-3, Lots 4-9 of Tract #8525 5th -6th St.: Portion of Lots 24, 25, Block 78, 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract 4th -5th St.: Lots 1-4 of Koepke's Tract, Lots 1-5 of Thorne's Hillside #2 3rd -4th St.: Portion of Lots 23-28. lots 29, 56, 57, of Walter Ransom Co.'s Venable Place Tract -32- 2nd -3rd St.: Portion of Lots 38-63, Lots 64, 65, 88 and 89 & Easterly 10' of lot 87 Walter Ransom Co.'s Venable Place Tract lst-2nd St.: Portion of Lots 90-95 of Walter Ransom Co.'s Venable Place Tract & Lots 96-99, 118.-119, portion or Lots 1-6; Lots 7, 8 of Tract #5019, Lot 142 of Walter Ransom Co.'s Venable Place,Tract lst-So.City Bdry: Lots 143-145 of Walter Ransom Co.'s Venable Place Tract; and the following text shall be added to the zoning ordinance: Article 9.7, Chapter 7, Specific Plan Area No. 7 Section 9.67-1. Authority. This Specific Plan Area is an instrument for implementing the General plan pursuant to Article 8, Chapter 3, of the State of California Planning and Zoning Law (California Government Code Section 65450 et. Seq.) Section 9.67-2 Location and Description. The subject area is located on the east and west side of Pacific Coast Highway and is designated as Commercial Corridor on the Official General Plan Map. Section 9.67-3 Purpose. The purpose of the Specific Plan Area is to set forth the development requirements, standards and permitted uses for the subject area, and to carry out the policies of the Commercial Corridor General Plan area as stated in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Section 9.67-4 Permitted Uses. A. Commercial permitted uses shall be the same as those permitted in C-3 General Commercial Zone as contained in Section 8-4 of the City of Hermosa Beach zoning ordinance, and nonconforming uses shall be subject to the provisions of Article 13, Nonconforming Building and Uses of the zoning ordinance,. B. A property being exclusively used for residential purposes at the date of the adoption of this ordinance shall be permitted to be continued as a residential use, maintaining its conforming status, and may be remodeled or redeveloped as a residential use as long as the density (number of dwelling units) is not increased. C. Residentially developed properties or vacant properties can only be converted to commercial uses if the property -.33 - fronts on Pacific Coast Highway or is an assemblage of properties which front on Pacific Coast Highway. D. Properties with existing commercial uses or other than residential uses which do not front on Pacific Coast Highway may be used commercially, expanded, and/or remodeled, if the existing access is maintained. E. Any residential use which shares a lot or parcel with a commercial use shall be considered a nonconforming use and subject to Article 13 of the zoning ordinance. Section 9.67-5 Residential Development Standards A. In respect to height, yard, setback, open space, and dimensional requirements, any residential project whether new or a remodel of an existing structure shall be subject to the provisions contained in the zoning ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach, depending on the applicable zoning district. The applicable residential zoning district shall be determined based on the nearest residential zoning district on the same block. Section 9.67-6 Commercial Development Standards A. Purpose and Intent. The standards and guidelines are designed to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of- Hermosa Beach and to encourage the development of high quality commercial development along Pacific Coast Highway in respect to its impact on residential projects, environmental impacts, circulation, and appearance. B. Standards. Two sets of standards apply in this specific plan area, First Tier and Second Tier. Compliance with First Tier standards allows the project to proceed a building permit. If a project goes beyond any of the first tier standards the procedure for submittal and approval of a Precise Development Plan shall be followed. Developments must be in compliance with Second Tier standards at all times. Project sponsors are encouraged to discuss preliminary plans of proposed projects with the Planning Department before making any formal applications for building permits or Precise Development Plans. First Tier Second Tier Maximum/Minimum Maximum/Minimum Requirements Requirements 1. Maximum Height: East of P.C.H.- 30 feet 40 feet West of P.C.H.- 35 feet 45 feet 2. Bulk: Max. 1.0 F.A.R.* none 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 *Gross Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio (excludes parking structures) 3. Maximum Size: 10,000 sq. ft. none Gross Floor Area 4. Min. Landscape Coverage: 570 of lot area 270 of lot area (The required landscape buffer between commerciah and residential zones shall not be included in this calculation) C. Requirements. The following requirements apply 'to all proposed projects: 1. Landscaping Specifications A minimum three (3) foot wide planter strip with raised 6" curbing, or an area equivalent in size to a 3 -foot wide planter strip along the front of the lot, shall be provided along street frontage. A 5 -gallon shrub shall be provided for each 20 sq. ft. 2. Setback from Residentially Zoned Property: A minimum of eight (8) feet plus two (2) feet for each additional story. 3. Landscaping Buffer from the Residential Zone: A Minimum five (5) foot wide planter strip landscaped' with a minimum of one 24 -inch or 15 -gallon size specimen tree provided for every 10 feet of length 4. Six (6) inch high raised concrete curbing shall be provided along the perimeter of all landscaped areas except on the side abutting building walls, or fences. 5. The development, including the landscaping and the entire property grounds, shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner. 6. All other development standards shall be governed by the City of Hermosa Beach Zoning Ordinance, including, but not limited to Article 8, Commercial Zones, and Article 11.5, Off -Street Parking. Section 9.67-6. Precise Development Plan. A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to set forth the procedures and guidelines for review of Precise 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Development Plans,which are required when a proposed project exceeds any one of the First Tier standards. B. Guidelines for Planning Commission review 1. General Guidelines: To allow projects which exceed any of the first tier standards, the overall building and project design should be of a superior quality, be compatible with surrounding properties, and be designed in scale with the community. The Planning Commission shall consider the following in making this determination: a. The building should be designed with interesting architectural features and materials to enhance the overall project. A three-dimensionsal quality should be emphasized by the use of stepping architectural features to avoid massive flat building faces. Special attention should be given to the appearance of the building from the street. b. Landscaping should be utilized throughout the site in a manner which enhances the building and the site, and to mitigate the visual impacts of any flat and/or massive parts of the building. c. The project should be compatible with neighboring, projects with respect to height, scale, bulk, proportion. This is not a prescription for architectural similar architectural styles, although in some cases it may be desirable, nor a prescription for existing mediocrity, as many existing buildings do not stand scrutiny under these guidelines. d. Architectural renderings and perspectives must be submitted to show the three dimensional quality of the proposed building(s). 2. Height. To allow projects to exceed' the first tier height limits the building design should incorporate features to minimize and break-up the visual impact and view impacts of the higher structures on neighboring residential areas and on the streetscape. The Planning Commission shall consider the following guidelines in making this determination: a. Limit lot coverage of uppermost level: The area of the portion of the structure which exceeds the first tier height limit should not cover a major portion of the lot area, and said over -height area should be compensated by a proportional area of the building which is at or less than the height limit. b. Flat roofs and flat vertical walls should be avoided: Stepped, variable, or sloping roofs -36 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 should be encouraged. The appearance of flat roofs and massive flat vertical walls should be- avoided through the use of stepping or tiered architectural features. c. Greater setbacks for upper levels: Progressing from the first floor to the uppermost story of the building setbacks from the rear property line should increase and exceed minimum requirements, and the upper stories shall have tiered setbacks from the lower levels as viewed from the front. 3. Bulk. To allow projects which exceed the maximum Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio (F.A.R.) the building design should incorporate features to minimize the appearance of bulk, and to compensate for the bulk of a building with attractive architectural features which enhance the building and which reduce the visual impact of large areas of flat vertical walls. The Planning Commission shall consider the following guidelines in making this determination: a. Avoid "box -like" structures: Significant and attractive architectural features should be used to break up the bulky appearance of "box -like" structures. b. Building step -backs: Step-ins and Step -outs should be used on the front of the building to break up the bulky• appearance. This could accompany varying widths of the landscape planter area in the front of the building. c. Variable heights: The roof -line of the building should should be designed with variable heights, and roof patterns or materials, to avo-id the appearance of a flat building. 4. Landscaping. The objective of the landscaping requirement is to enhance the overall project including the streetscape, to complement the building design, to break up the impact of vast expanses of pavement, to buffer sound and visual impacts on neighboring residential areas, to provide shade for parking areas and to deflect direct sunlight into the interior of buildings. To allow less than the minimum 5% coverage, a landscaping plan must compensate for the loss of -coverage by providinga superior design through the use of types, quantity, and location of plant materials to achieve the objectives described above. B. General Criteria. In considering the Precise Development Plan for any development, the following criteria for granting or conditionally granting said permit shall be considered: _3,7 - 1. Distance from existing residential uses in relation to negative effects. 2. Impact on ocean views from residential areas 3. The amount of existing or proposed off-street parking in relation to actual need. 4. The combination of uses proposed, as they relate to compatibility. 5. The relationship of the estimated generated traffic volume and the capacity and safety of streets serving the area. 6. The proposed exterior signs and decor, and the compatibility thereof with existing establishments in the area. 7. Building and driveway orientation in relation to sensitive uses, e.g., residences and schools. 8. Noise, odor, dust and/or vibration that may be generated by the proposed use. 9. Impact of the proposed use to the city's infrastructure, and/pr services. 10. Adequacy of mitigation measures to minimize environmental impacts in quantitative terms. 11. Other considerations that, in the judgment of the Planning Commission, are necessary to assure compatibility with the surrounding uses, and the city as a whole. C. Criteria for denial. 1. The proposed development would substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity or interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in such area, because of excessive dissimilarity or inappropriateness of design inrelation to the surrounding vicinity, and there are no known conditions of approval which can be imposed that could resolve such problems. 2. The proposed development would have significant environmental adverse impacts which can not be mitigated, and where the finding of overriding considerations cannot be made. D. The decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by filing a written appeal within ten (10) days of the Planning Commission's decision. E. An approved Plan shall be valid for a one (1) year period and, should development fail to commence -3g- 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 within such time limitation and no extension is granted, shall become null and void. F. No person shall violate or fail to comply with any approved plan or any condition or provision thereof, nor shall a building permit be issued for any building or structure which would violate or fail to comply with an approved Plan. G. General Procedures and submittal requirements. 1. Application for Precise Development Plan review shall be filed and approval given prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Applications shall include detailed and fully dimensioned site plans, building plans, floor plans, architectural drawings and elevations including perspective drawings to exhibit the required three-dimensional features, landscape plans and/or any other data found to be reasonably required 3. Applications shall be submitted to the City Planning Department and shall be in compliance with the department's specific requirements. 4. Fees for submittals shall be set by policy of the City Council. VOTE: AYES: Chrmn.Ingell.Comms.Rue.Peirce.Ketz.Moore NOES: None ABSTAIN:None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 90-8 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of February 20, 1990. • Scott Ingell, Chairman Michael Schubach, Secretary Date a/perscc 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89-5270 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO ELIMINATE THE LAND USE CATEGORY OF MULTI -USE CORRIDOR AND CREATE A LAND USE CATEGORY OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR AND TO ADOPT A STATEMENT OF POLICIES FOR THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on March 21, 1989 and made the following Findings:. A. The land use category of Multi -Use Corridor, established in 1966, is no longer an appropriate land use designation for the Pacific Coast Highway commercial corridor as it does not clearly convey the City's goals and objectives for development along the corridor; B. Creation of the land use category of Commercial Corridor as a designation for the Pacific. Coast Highway commercial corridor is an appropriate designation as it more clearly conveys a commitment to commercial development along Pacific Coast Highway; C. The designation of Commercial Corridor will be applied to a more focused area along the east and west side of Pacific Coast Highway than the Multi -Use Corridor designation to recognize more realistically the the limits of the depth of commercial development acceptable to the citizens of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby amendthe Text of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to eliminate the Land Use category of "Multi -Use Corridor" and create the Land Use category of "Commercial Corridor" and the following text shall be added to the Land Use Element of the General Plan: Commercial Corridor - The purpose of this land use category is to clearly define the limits of the depth of commercial development along Pacific Coast Highway and prohibit the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (''SOLUTION NO. 89-5270 development of new residential uses within the area with exceptions for vacant property not fronting on Pacific Coast Highway. Existing residential uses within the corridor are expressly allowed and can be improved, expanded and rebuilt to the same density, however, the transition of these uses to commercial usage is highly desirable. This category allows various types of commercial land uses including retail, service, and office uses. Automotive related commercial uses would be allowed by conditional use permit only. To'ensure that commercial development will be compatible with existing nearby residential uses standards for building height, parking and access, setbacks, and landscaping will be implemented through Specific Plan Area designations Policies: 1) Existing structures used for residential purposes on -a lot or parcel which is exclusively used for residential purposes are permitted to .remain indefinitely,' and shall be considered conforming uses, allowing said structure to be improved., rebuilt, or expanded, as =long as the existing residential density is not increased. 2) Residentially developed and vacant property can only be _.used for ` commercial •..pur.poses i f :. the .property . fronts : on Pacific Coast Highway or is part of an assemblage of properties containing a commercial project which fronts on Pacific Coast Highway. New residential projects shall be prohibited, except in the following cases: a) on currently vacant lots or parcels of land which do not front on Pacific coast Highway and which are not currently connected by ownership to lots fronting on Pacific Coast Highway and which will be developed to a density consistent with surrounding residential densities allowed by the General Plan, subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission; and, b) the improvement, expansion, or reconstruction of current _ residential structures which does not increase the current residential density (number of dwelling units) of the lot or parcel of land and said improvement, expansion, or reconstruction must conform to the zoning standards. 4) Height limits and the method of measurement shall be established which will minimize impacts of commercial development on scenic views and on the privacy of adjacent residences. 5) Landscaping requirements shall be established to improve the attractiveness of development along Pacific Coast Highway and to buffer interfacing or abutting residential development. RESOLUTION NO. y -:-;.?70 6) Traffic impact studies shall be required for projects which will cause significant traffic impacts and these studies shall include proposed measures to mitigate the impacts. 7) All new commercial projects shall require Planning Commission Review to ensure compliance with the standards and policies of the Specific Plan Area, subject to City Council Appeal. 8) A list of permitted uses shall be established which permits a broad range of commercial and office related uses with emphasis given to uses which have the highest benefit to the community. 9) More than one SPA zone may be created for areas of the corridor based on the sub -area's unique features. 10) Orientation of all commercial development should be toward P.C.H. and not toward local residential streets 11) Physical setbacks, and architectural treatment shall be provided where commercial and residential development abut, or interface 12). Assembled ;lots _proposed for commercial developmet be merged'as a condition of development. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 9th day of May 19 shall SIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of ermosa Beach, California. TY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION �Z— Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council and Planning Commission January 31, 1990 Joint Meeting of February 15, 1990. SUBJECT: SUMMARY AND STATUS OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS AND ZONE CHANGES FOR THE MULTI -USE CORRIDOR INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL The following actions have been taken by the Planning Commission and the City Council at the noted dates towards the elimination of the "Multi -Use Corridor" designation and the subsequent rezoning of the affected areas. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 11/9/88 The City Council adopted a 10 -month moratorium on residential and commercial construction for portions of the Multi -Use -Corridor to study the various land uses within the Multi -Use Corridor and to consider changes in the policies, regulations, and land use designations which guide development in the P.C.H.. corridor. The reason for the study was to reconsider the seemingly unrealistic 300 -foot depth MUC designation on the General Plan the and Commercial Potential designations on the zoning map, and to consider commercial development standards. 1/30/89 Advanced Planner is hired to work on study 2/23/89 The Staff Environmental Review Committee recommended a Negative Declaration for the amendments being considered because portions of the MUC are proposed to be changed to residential designations thereby reducing the potential intensity of land use in the area. 4/4/89 After two public hearings the Planning Commission recommends amendments to the General Plan to eliminate the MUC designation, and to redesignate a portion Commercial Corridor and a portion residential designations generally recognizing existing development patterns. Policies for development in the Corridor were recommended. 5/9/89 After two public hearings the City Council adopted a slightly modified version of the amendments recommended by the Planning Commission and accomplished the following (See attached maps): Established the boundary of the Pacific Coast Highway "Commercial Corridor" at reasonable depths recognizing existing development,and a few areas for potential -9-3- conversion to commercial --redesignated said areas from MUC to Commercial Corridor Amended the General Plan Map to redesignate areas not within the Commercial Corridor from MUC to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, or High Density Residential, depending on the adjacent designation. Amended the text of the Land ,Use Element of the General Plan by adopting. the P.C. recommended definition for the "Commercial' Corridor" which included a recommendation to rezone 'the Commercial Corridor to commercial Specific Plan Areas Initiated the consideration of zone changes for the residential areas outside the Commercial Corridor to classifications consistent with the adjacent residential classifications SUMMARY: Redesignations resulted in the redesignation of approximately 21 acres from Multi -Use Corridor to a residential designation, and the redesignation of the remaining 31.6 acres from MUC to Commercial Corridor. This reduced the area of maximum commercial development allowed under the General Plan from 52.6 acres to 31.6 acres, but still allows for a potential increase in commercially developed acreage of 18 percent over the current amount of 267 acres. ZONE CHANGES 7/5/891. P.C. recommended zone changes for residential areas east of the northeast portion of the Commercial Corridor (14th Street - 16th Street) from R-2 to R-1 and R-2 to R -2B 8/1/89 P.C. recommended zone changes for residential areas in northwest portion (16th - 24th Street) 8/8/89 C.C. adopted P.C. recommendation for zone changes in northeast portion 8/22/89 C.C. extended moratorium an additional year 9/5/89 P.C. made recommendation for zone changes for residential areas east and west of south portion of the Commercial Corridor (South Boundary to 8th Street) to rezone from R-3 to R-2 those areas west of Corridor, and not to rezone R-2 areas east of Corridor 10/24/89 C.C. adopted zone changes, modifying P.C. recommendation, for northeast portion, C-3 to Residential S.P.A's and R -1A. Adopts zone changes for southwest portion (R-3 to R-2) per P.C. recommendation, and for southeast portion (R-2 to R -2B) against P.C. recommendation. 1/16/90 P.C. public hearing regarding rezoning the Commercial Corridor designated areas -- continued to 2/20/90 - - REMAINING STEPS TO BE TAKEN Complete zone changes for Commercial Corridor Plan Areas. Staff is currently working on standards for the Planning Commission. Consider elimination designations. of the remaining Attachments 1. Before and after General Plan maps 2. Before and after zoning maps. CONCUR: ,1,— /.7/ ,..,,///-7,--->/:;• r''i, , /1 .:. G: ---,1--).'.." /------ Michael Schubach Planning Director. Kevin Northcya t City Manager to Specific the S.P.A. C -Potential /Ken Robertson Associate Planner ZONE CHANGES FROM C-3. R-1, R-2. AND R -P TO COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND ADOPTION OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR ALONG EAST AND WEST SIDES OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BETWEEN SOUTH CITY BOUNDARY TO EIGHTH STREET (CONTINUED FROM MEETING OF JANUARY 16. 19�� Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated February 7, 1990. Staff recommended that the areas designated commercial corridor on the general plan, located south of 8th Street, be rezoned from their current zoning classifications of C-3, R-1, R-2, R-3, and R -P (the majority being C-3) to commercial specific plan area. Mr. Schubach displayed an overhead slide depicting the area in question as he gave the staff report. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of January 16, 1990, continued this item and directed staff to consider alternatives to address comments at the meeting and to return with a modified proposal. This has not been a simple task, given that a variety of different and conflicting concerns were noted. Consequently, staff proposed a modified recommendation with the emphasis on refining the procedure, requirements, and criteria for review of precise development plans. Also, staff included three other alternatives to staffs recommendation for the Planning Commission to consider. Staff emphasized that it is extremely important that a final decision be made on this matter because of the pending expiration of the moratorium in August. of 1990 and the need to also complete zone changes and a specific plan area for the northern portion of the commercial corridor. Staff's previous approach was to develop standards and limitations which are more restrictive than those in the C-3 zone relating to height, landscaping, and buffering of residential zones. Also, the proposal included a requirement for precise development plans for all commercial projects to give the Planning Commission the authority to impose conditions recognizing the unique features of each particular project and to lessen the adverse environmental impacts of a project. Staff felt that it is still a generally appropriate method for dealing with the problem; however, the Planning Commission expressed concern about the requirement for precise development plans in all cases, as it would often require the Commission to make tough decisions to impose more restrictive standards on proposed projects and possibly lead to inconsistency in decisions and perhaps create uncertainty for developers as to what can be built. As such, staff modified the precise development plan procedure in a manner which would keep the positive attribute of flexibility to consider the unique features of particular projects but would provide a level of certainty for developers willing to meet some basic standards. The concept is to provide a first tier of development standards that, if complied with, would not require any discretionary approvals, making a project exempt from environmental review and requiring only a building permit from the City, although the Planning Department would be involved in plan check regarding the approval ofsite plans and landscape plans. Projects that contain any elements that go beyond these standards, however, would trigger the requirement of a precise development plan, requiring public hearings, Planning Commission approval, and P.C. Minutes 2/20/90 - 5t6 environmental review. Traffic impacts would be considered as part of the environmental review. Staff believes that this would provide somewhat of an incentive for developers to build projects of an appropriate scale and height. Also, there would be flexibility to go beyond the standards, and the Planning Commission would be in a position to allow more bulk, higher structures, or extremely large projects only if certain guidelines are followed to their satisfaction. This concept requires two tiers of development standards: (1) standards that.. if exceeded, would trigger the precise development plan requirement and which the Planni g Commission would have authority to waive if certain guidelines are followed; and (2): maximum or minimum standards which could not be exceeded except though a variance. Staff recommended the following standards for the first tier which would trigger the precise development plan: Height east of P.C.H. would be 30 feet; height west of P.C.H. of 35 feet bulk of 1.0 FAR; size of 15,000 square feet; and landscape coverage of 5 percent of the lot area. The second tier maximum/minimum standards would be: height east of P.C.H. of 40 feet; height west of P.C.H. of 45 feet; no bulk or size requirement; and landscaping coverage of two percent of the lot area. Mr. Schubach, in response to questions from Comm. Ketz regarding the landscaping, stated that the Commission may want to clarify that section of the ordinance Comm. Rue, noting that most of the lots in the City are quite small, asked how many projects in the City could potentially trigger the 15,000 square foot requirement. Mr. Schubach stated that the motel project as well as other projects which involve assemblage of lots or recycled properties would trigger the requirement. He clarified that any project which exceeds the first tier requirements would trigger the ordinance. Comm. Rue asked about requirements used in other cities. Churn. Ingell ref:alled that the Commissioners had previously desired to make the ordinance as simple as possible in order to attract good development. He questioned the feasibility of automatic review for all projects in the area in question, such as is done in other cities. Mr. Schubach stated that developers have expressed their desire to have concise standards in writing so that they do not have to appear before the Planning Commission to clarify what can and cannot be built in the City. Public Hearing opened at 10:28 P.M. by Chmn. Ingell. Mike Xenos, 705 Pacific Coast Highway, explained that his father had owned the property in question for a number of years with a partner. He continued by giving background information about the property, and stated that he has been in the process of deciding what to do with this property. He said there is not much frontage on the property; therefore, he feels the best use would be as a motel, which it has been for quite some time. He therefore asked if the use could be grandfathered in in order to avoid having to go through the precise plan process. He said that the spirit and intent of the plan is acceptable; however, he felt that imposition of these requirements would diminish the marketability of the property. He said that they could work with the Planning Department to meet the standards and thus avoid the necessity of having to go through the entire hearing process. Gerry Compton, 200 Pier Avenue, addressed the Commission and stated that he was very pleased to see the staff work which was done on this project. Even though he does not agree with everything in the document, he felt that it will help developers know what is allowed. P.C. Minutes 2/20/90 _4L7__ Mr. Compton favored the concept of setting reasonable restrictions for developers. If they want to build upwards, they can then make a request to the City to deviate from the requirements. Mr. Compton discussed the fact that many cities require conditional use permits for all projects, and he felt that that is an attempt to limit development. He continued by discussing development along the highway and the fact that many developers were not aware of what kinds of development could take place. Mr. Compton discussed the specific requirements and felt that the 15,000 square foot trigger might be excessive, and he suggested that 10,000 square feet might be a more reasonable number to trigger the additional new requirements. Mr. Compton stated that he had been grappling with the issue of allowing a different height on each side of the highway, noting that this might be a reasonable requirement, especially taking into account the various slopes along that area. Mr. Compton discussed the fact that developers must be given an incentive to create attractive - looking buildings. He stated that large, boxy buildings are not desirable, and the wording in the ordinance seems to address this issue. Mr. Compton discussed the way the height ismeasured in Manhattan Beach as opposed to Hermosa Beach and how buildings will be different because of the different methods of measurement. Mr. Compton stated that, on the whole, he agrees with the staff work on this document. Mr: Compton stated that he would prefer to see a mix of buildings along the highway. He stressed the importance of developers knowing what can be built in order to encourage good development. He stated that the guidelines must be very clear. Comm. Peirce asked for Mr. Compton's opinion on the issue of strip commercial development and whether it should be allowed. Mr. Compton did not feel that the City needs any more strip development along the highway. However, if the economics dictate that strip development is the only feasible alternative, a person has property rights and should be allowed to put in such a development. He felt that people should be encouraged to do better projects than strip developments. Jim Wellbaum, 222 North Sepulveda, El Segundo, stated that he has read the report and wanted to commend staff on their fine work. He felt that the document is very thorough, and he highly recommended approval at this time. He said that the moratorium has taken the wind out of the sails of many developers. He felt that the document will give developers a clear idea of what direction they can take in regard to their projects. Although he does not agree with everything in the report, he agrees .with approximately 95 percent of the suggestions. Public Hearing closed at 10:58 P.M. by Chmn. Ingell. Comm. Peirce agreed that the document is good; his only concern is over the square footage which will trigger the requirements. He felt that 10,000 square feet would be a more appropriate figure to trigger the tier. Comm. Moore favored approval as written by staff, with the 15,000 square foot figure. MOTION by Comm. Moore, seconded by Comm. Rue, to approve staffs recommendation as written. Comm. Moore felt that it is important to use a technique which will set up fairly restrictive standards which are clear. So long as a developer stays within the standards, it will not be P.C. Minutes 2/20/90 necessary for him to deal with the bureaucracy. In this way, people will not be robbed of their property rights in that if they want to develop further, they have the right to come to the City and ask to do so. Chmn. Ingell agreed that staff did an excellent job; however, he felt that the 15,000 square -foot trigger is excessive, and it should be reduced. Comm. Ketz agreed that the triggering square footage should be smaller, especially because of the small lots in town and the fact that not many would accommodate a project ofn ore than 15,000 square feet. She continued by discussing mini mall and strip development, noting that such projects have been outlawed in many cities. She questioned the feasibility of a"ban on such development along the highway. Comm. Peirce felt that the issue of mini malls and strip development should be addressed in the future. He personally felt that such development is very ugly. Mr. Schubach suggested that the issue be addressed along with the land use element. Comm. Moore argued in support of the motion to approve, stating that the standards are reasonable, and he felt that the first and second tier triggers are appropriate. Comm. Rue discussed strip centers, stating that the intensity of use appears to be the main issue regarding such centers. He felt that if strip centers are going to be allowed, the quality must be better. He questioned how better quality projects can be encouraged. Comm. Rue suggested amendments to the motion: (1) that the floor area be reduced to 10,000 square feet of gross floor area to trigger the first tier requirement; (2) in regard to Condition No. 3, wordage shall be added to encourage low maintenance landscaping and to provide for its upkeep; (3) wording shall be added stating that the required landscaping shall be in excess of the required landscaping buffer. Mr. Schubach, in response to concerns raised by Comm. Rue, suggested the addition of a condition requiring that the development, grounds and landscaping, shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner. Comm. Rue discussed Section 9.67-6, Section B, Item lc, and questioned whether the wording is redundant; i.e., "...This is not a prescription for architectural similar architectural styles...." He felt that the wording is not clear. He also felt that Item la appears to cover the same issue as that in Item ld. Comm. Rue discussed Section 9.67-6, Section B, Item ld and questioned whether it would be appropriate to include wording stating that three-dimensional models may be required as deemed appropriate by the Planning Director, or at the discretion of the Planning Commission. He felt that models could be quite helpful in certain projects. A discussion ensued regarding the feasibility of requiring models. Comm. Moore stated that he does not feel it would be appropriate to require models in some cases and not in others, stating that if the code says a model "may be required" the standards would not be clear. Public Hearing reopened at 11:11 P.M. by Chinn. Ingell. Gerry Compton, 200 Pier Avenue, addressed the Commission and explained that three- dimensional models can be quite expensive and time consuming to make. He said that computers can now generate detailed 3-D images which serve to depict projects in greater detail. Howard Longacre stated that models many times prove to be worth their weight in gold. He felt that it is ridiculous for an architect to assert that models are too expensive to make. P.C. Minutes 2/20/90 419 Public Hearing closed at 11:15 P.M. by Chinn Ingell. Comm Peirce felt that only 3-D renderings should be required, not models. He felt that models are very expensive, and the 3-D renderings from several angles are adequate to give a feel for a project. Comm. Peirce stated that the standards should be quite clear; he therefore did not favor conditions stating that certain things "may be required." Comm. Rue suggested a change to Section 9.67-6, Item 4, Landscaping, from: "The objective of the landscaping requirement is to enhance the streetscape...." to: "The objective of the landscaping requirement is to enhance the project in total...." (Vote on CommMoore's MOTION TO APPROVE, with 15,000 square feet as the trigger, but including the following amendments as suggested by Comm. Rue and agreed to by Comm. Moore: (1) addition of wording in Section 9.67-6, Commercial Development Standards, Item C3, Landscaping Buffer from the Residential Zone, to state: "The landscape buffer between the project and residential zones is not included in the calculations of the landscape area"; (2) addition of a condition to Section 9.67-6, Item 1, (to be Condition No. 6) stating that "The development shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner"; (3) Section 9.67-6, Precise Development Plan, Item. B4, Landscaping, shall be modified to state: "The objective of the landscaping requirement is to enhance the project in total...." AYES: Comm. Moore NOES: Comms. Ketz, Peirce, Rue, Chmn. Ingell ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None (MOTION FAILS.) MOTION by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Ketz, to approve staffs recommendation, Resolution P.C. 90-8, with. the modification that the trigger. be 10,000 square feet, and with the inclusion of the three above-mentioned amendments. AYES: Comms. Ketz, Moore, Peirce, Rue, Chinn. Ingell NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None P.C. Minutes 2/20/90 ZONE CHANGES FROM C-3, R-1, R-2, AND R -P TO COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND ADOPTION OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE SOUTHERN PORTIONS OF THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR ALONG EAST AND WEST SIDES OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BETWEEN SOUTH CITY BOUNDARY TO EIGHTH STREET. Mr. Robertson gave staff report dated January 10, 1990. Staff is recommending that the areas designated Commercial Corridort�'in the General Plan, located south of eighth street, be rezoned from. their current zoning classifications of C-3, R-1, R-2, R-3, and R -P (the majority being C-3) to Commercial Specific Plan Area. The City Council, at their meeting of May 9, 1989, amended the Land Use Element of the General Plan by eliminating the Multi -Use Corridor and creating the Commercial Corridor and several residential designations. Previous efforts of the Planning Commission and City. Council focused on defining ;the boundaries of commercial development along Pacific Coast Highway, and now the efforts will be focused on the establishment of development standards for these areas to ensure a level of quality for future development of this corridor with minimum impact to neighboring residential areas. Staff's approach was to develop more restrictive standards for the C-3 zone in areas such as height and view blockage, landscaping and buffering, and use of current residential properties fronting on side streets. The subject area is currently completely built out, containing a mix of commercial uses, with a focus on automotive related uses. Parking is inadequate, and the structures are old and unattractive. Landscaping is sparse and infrequent, and there is an abundance of signage. This strip, however, is very well traveled and quite vibrant. The majority of the lots are rather small, and the trend is leaning toward combining lots to create larger commercial developments. Stafff recommended one Specific Plan Area which contains a different height requirement for the east and west side of Pacific Coast Highway to recognize the different impact on views to the west.. All other requirements are the same for both sides and use the existing C-3 permitted use list and existing parking requirements as currently contained in the zoning ordinance for the C-3 zone. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission approve the proposed Zone Change and Negative Declaration. Mr. Schubach, in response to a question from Chmn. Rue, replied that the goals have already been set in the General Plan Amendment. This policy will help to reduce the commercial/residential conflict, and will encourage commercial growth. Public hearing opened by Chmn. Rue at 9:38 p.m. PC Minutes 01/16/90 Jerry Compton, 200 Pier Avenue #9, Hermosa Beach, stated that the part of this policy affecting him is the development standards. He said that he hopes there will be more than one public hearing on this issue, because. he just received the information about it and needs time to study it. This policy is proposing some major changes, and all development along Pacific Coast Highway needs to be looked at carefully. Hopefully this Commission will develop some solid standards to follow to let the developer know what is expected from the very beginning. Betty Ryan, 588:20th_Street, Hermosa. Beach,.questioned,the fate of.the !commercial... potential': zone.. Will any action tonight change commercial potential to strictly commercial? Also, how does the Planning Commission feel about commercial abutting residential without any form of transition? Greg :Tucker,. 850 8th .Place,: Hermosa. Beach, : felt_ it ..was. nice .that Hermosa Beach wasn't becoming -a major commercial_oriented city, but maintains a high level of residential areas. It is nice to keep the heights down to avoid blocking any views. - Jim Housing,:_ 93.4 . 7th. Street,_ Hermosa :Beach, said that he applaudsthe efforts -of staff to keep the heights down, but felt itwould: be better if the - heights were even . lower.: Public hearing closed by Chmn. Rue at 9:49 p.m. Chmn. Rue commented on the lack -of community response to this issue, and asked staff if .:it .were noticed for public hearing: - :' u.c c _, Mr. Schubach replied that most residents were satisfied with the changes proposed at the General Plan -:Review., and ;this ':step is 'merely:an implementation phase. Comm. Peirce stated that this particular plan may not encourage more development,but.. it may encourage a piece -meal :aggregation of side street lots.. If access is required off of Pacific Coast Highway only, could -the. business .:owner acquirethe adjacent .residentiallot at the rear and use it as 'a parking lot with side street access? Mr. Schubach repliedin the. positive. Comm. Peirce felt that 40 feet was too high for this area, and proposed a 35 foot maximum. The area would appear out of scale because of the depth of the area. The City should encourage aggregation of lots to encourage new development in the commercial area. Comm. Ketz saidthat she would rather see the same height on both sides of the=street, and 35 feet would be more appropriate than 40 feet. She suggested adding some form of sign standards and requirements to add consistency to the commercial area, and a section for street trees in the landscaping plan. PC Minutes 01/16/90 -SZ Comm. Ingell felt that this item is too large to decide on in only one meeting, and suggested breaking the project into smaller issues rather than having a blanket Specific Plan Area. Some of the lots involved are larger and the requirements would be different. Churn. Rue concurred, but felt that -it may not be necessary to break the plan up into smaller issues. It Would be nice to get more community input, however, before making a decision. The city should set the,limits and then live by them. Comm.-Peirce-stated_thatan incentive is needed to keep the contractors developing under the maximum height limit, such as,_ -allowing -automatic Board approval if the proposal. comes -in under the maximum. This -issue should be continued in order to weigh it out more thoroughly. We need to make sure that it doesn't get too complicated. - Comm. Ingell stated that. the whole -issue goes deeper than just the height of the buiiding;- the type of business is also important. -A design review is -needed to check all new businesses coming -into Hermosa Beach. The public hearing was reopened by Chmn...Rue -at_ -10_:.04, p.m. Robert Heard, 418.:Oceanview Avenue, Hermosa Beach, asked the Commission to explain what the 'commercial potential' zone was and what it means to future- development. Mr:- Robertson explained that.. the city :is planning .to.eliminate the commercial: : potentiai7-zone:_ and convert.. -it -,to _:residential only with a rezoning hearing in the future. Only if the property in question is in the commercial corridor. and adjacent to commercial property which fronts on. the_highway,.could.it be. converted. to commercial. use.. Mr. Schubach noted that there is nothing keeping the zoning from changing.in..a particular area at.sometime in_the future..Any..property owner: •has . the :right` to request - a:.zone change - Jerry Compton, 200: pier Avenue #.9., Hermosa..Beach, agreed that .the height limit should be the-. same for both sides of the street, and some buildings should be allowed a variance if parts of that building will not impact. any views.. If.you're:going to require a Precise Development Plan you need to allow more options. Maybe certain sections of the Zoning Code could .be referenced in.the Specific.Plan Area -policy that state -specific requirements to follow. Itis too easy to miss sections that are important. This is a:bi-g step for the city. Jeff Wellbaum, 222 No. Sepulveda Boulevard, El Segundo, representative of Jeep/Eagle Dealership, stated that the dealership has a lot totalling almost one acre, and with, a45 foot Eieight limitation there is an economical restriction. Retail offices, -hotels, etc., can't be built in this area because of the height limit, and these developments make money by renting space by the square foot. No one is interested in the Jeep site because they can't develop a working plan within the existing PC Minutes 01/16/90 guidelines to be economical.- There is no market here for office development, but maybe a:terraced hotel would be feasible. The city needs more clear cut Code requirements, and -the sections need to be redesigned and more concrete. The public hearing was closed by Chmn. Rue at 10:21 p.m. MOTION by Comm. Ingell, seconded by Comm. Peirce, to continue the zone change and Negative Declaration to the next meeting date in February. Comm. Peirce stated that. the Commission needs additional information from staff regarding a bulk limiting paragraph for this recommendation. The city couldpossibly allow a higher building if it is less bulky in appearance. Furthermore, the Commission needs some economical information, and more feedback from those who might build in the effected area... Comm. Ketz concurred stating that it would offer more flexibility. Comm. Ingell .suggested contacting the Chamber of Commerce for information about what businesses would use this property. We need to knowwhat would be a viable business -for this area. Chmn.=Rue noted that the property owners on Pacific Coast Highway keep track of business coming in and going out, and staff could contact them for input.We need to establish development standards and parameters. Mr. .Compton added that the Building Industry Association would be of some help with this research. They could supply information on typical businesses forthis area. _ Comm.= Peirce commented that this may be too much work for two weeks, and asked staff if they needed more -time._ Mr. Schubach explained that staff couldsupply more information and adjust the standards, but this is the implementation stage, and future development is only a prediction. The standards need to be set for today's .business development. The text can always be changed in the future to adjust to the area and usage. The intensive study has already been done. MOTION by Comm. Ingell, seconded by Comm. Peirce, to continue this discussion to the second meeting in February, February 20, 1990. No objections; so ordered. PC Minutes 01/16/90 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission (CONTINUED FROM THE 1/16/90 MEETING) February 7, 1990 Regular Meeting of February 20, 1990 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 89-9 LOCATION: COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AREAS ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY; SOUTH OF EIGHTH STREET INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO REZONE SAID AREAS FROM C-3, R-1, R-2, R-3, AND R -P (MOSTLY C-3) TO A COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE RECENTLY AMENDED LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN Recommendation Staff is recommending that the areas designated Commercial Corridor on the General Plan, located south of 8th Street be rezoned from their current zoning classifications of C-3, R-1, R-2, R-3, and R -P (The majority being C-3) to Commercial Specific Plan Area. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of 1/16/90 continued this item and directed staff to consider alternatives to address comments at the meeting, and to return with a modified proposal. This has not been a simple task, given that a variety of different and conflicting concerns were noted. Consequently, staff is proposing a modified recommendation with the emphasis on refining the procedure, requirements, and criteria for review of precise development plans. Also staff has included three other alternatives to staff's recommendation for the Planning Commission to consider. Staff would like to emphasize that it is extremely important that a final decision be made on this matter because of the pending expiration of the moratorium (August 1990) and the need to also to complete zone changes and a specific plan area for the northern portion of the Commercial Corridor. Analysis Staff's previous approach was to develop standards and limitations which are more restrictive than those in the C-3 zone relating to height, landscaping and buffering of residential zones. Also, the proposal included a requirement for precise development plans for all commercial projects to give the Planning Commission the authority to impose conditions recognizing the unique features of each particular project, and to lessen the adverse environmental impacts of a project. - 3-- i� C Staff believes that it is still generally an appropriate method for dealing with the problem, however, the Planning Commission expressed concern about the requirement for precise development plans in all cases as it would often require the Commission to make tough decisions to impose more restrictive standards on proposed projects, and possibly lead to inconsistency in decisions, and perhaps create uncertainty for developers as to what can be built. As such, staff has modified the precise development plan procedure .in a manner which would keep the positive attribute of flexibility to consider the unique features of particular projects, but would provide a level of certainty for developers willing to meet some basic standards. The concept is to provide a first tier of development standards that if complied with would not require any discretionary approvals, making a project exempt from environmental review, and requiring only a building permit from the city (although the Planning Department would be involved in plan check regarding the approval of site plans and landscape plans). Projects that contain any elements that go beyond these standards, however, would trigger the requirement of a precise development plan, requiring public hearings, Planning Commission approval, and environmental review (traffic impacts would be considered as part of the environmental review). Staff believes that this would provide somewhat of an incentive for developers to build projects of an appropriate scale and height. Also, there would be flexibility to go beyond the standards, and the Planning Commission would be in a position to allow more bulk, higher structures., or extremely large projects only if certain guidelines are followed to their satisfaction. This concept requires two tiers of development standards: 1) Standards that if exceeded would trigger the precise development plan requirement and which the Planning Commission would have authority to waive if certain guidelines, are followed, and; 2) Maximum or minimum standards which could not be exceeded except through a Variance. PROPOSALS Staff's recommended standards are as follows: First Tier Second Tier Triggers P.D.P. Max/Min standard Height: East of P.C.H.: 30 feet 40 feet West of P.C.H.: 35 feet 45 feet Bulk: 1.0 F.A.R.* none Size: 15,000 sq. ft. none Landscaping Coverage: 5% of lot. area 2% of lot area c *Gross Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio (excludes parking structures) The following standards would apply in all circumstances as maximum/minimum standards Landscaping Min. 3' wide planter strips with Specifications: raised 6" curbing, or an area equivalent in size, along street frontage, 5 -gallon shrub for each 20 sq. ft. Setback from R -zone: 8 feet plus 2 feet for each add'l story Buffering from R -zone: Min. 5' wide planter strip with 24-inch/15 gallon tree every 10 feet JUSTIFICATION The above first tier standards were developed by staff by considering probable view impact, existing height standards in nearby residential areas, and from estimates of a building height, bulk, and size which would easily fit into the scale and character of the P.C.H. corridor and, therefore, would not require the close scrutiny of the merits of a particular project. The height consideration was discussed in the previous report. Staff chose these new limits based on the testimony of the previous meeting, discussions with affected property owners, and from the comments of the Planning Commission. Again staff believes -that the different height requirements for the east and west side of the highway are appropriate, although it has been reduced to only, a 5 -foot difference. Staff's proposed second tier standards do allow higher buildings than previously proposed, but these would be under the scrutiny of the Planning Commission, and would be required to be designed in accordance with guidelines to mitigate the impact of the higher buildings. In regards to the bulk standards, as expressed in floor area to. lot ratio, staff considered parking standards, and prepared some rough schematics on some typical lots in the area. It appeared that to exceed a 1:1 F.A.R. would likely require two levels of a parking structure, and at least two stories. Parking structures would not be included in the F.A.R. calculation so staff does not believe this to be a very restrictive first tier requirement. Staff also looked at the F.A.R. of some recently completed• projects in the city: Lot Size Gross Floor Area F.A.R. Hermosa Hotel 27,000 sq. ft. 35,000 sq. ft. 1.3 Hermosa Pavilion 87,000 sq. ft. 79,000 sq. ft. 0.9 1200 Artesia 7,300 sq. ft. 6,200 sq. ft. 0.85 (Office Bldg.) TraveLodge 27,600 sq. ft. 33,000 sq. ft. 1.2 C Staff also believes that significantly large projects, no matter what the height or bulk, should be subject to the P.D.P. requirement, and therefore included a first tier of standard of a maximum of 15,000 square feet of gross floor area. GUIDELINES FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF P.D.P.'S Staff is also recommending that guidelines be included in the S.P.A. which give the Planning Commission some direction for making findings to "waive" the first tier standards, these guidelines are as follows: General. To allow projects which exceed any of the first tier standards the overall building and project design should be of a superior quality, be compatible with surrounding properties, and be designed in scale with the community. The Planning Commission shall consider the following in making this determination. 1. The building should be designed with interesting architectural features and materials to enhance the overall project. A three-dimensional quality should be emphasized by the useof stepping architectural features to avoid massive flat building faces. Special attention should be given to the appearance of the building from the street. 2. Landscaping should be utilized throughout the site in a manner which enhances the building and the site, and to mitigate the visual impacts of any flat and/or massive parts of the building. 3. The project should be compatible with neighboring projects with respect to height, scale, bulk, proportion. This is not a prescription for similar architectural styles, although in some cases it may be desirable, nor a prescription for existing mediocrity, as many existing buildings do not stand scrutiny under these guidelines. 4. Architectural renderings and perspectives must be submitted to show the three dimensional quality of the proposed building(s). Height. To allow projects to exceed the first tier height limits the building design should incorporate features to minimize and break-up the visual impact and view impacts of the higher structures on neighboring residential areas and on the streetscape. The Planning Commission shall consider the following guidelines in making this determination: 1. Limit lot coverage of uppermost level: The area of the portion of the structure which exceeds the first tier height limit should not cover a major portion of the lot area, and said over -height area should be compensated by a proportional area of the building which is at or less than the height limit. (. ( 2. Flat roofs and flat vertical walls should be avoided: Stepped, variable, or sloping roofs should be encouraged. The appearance of flat roofs and massive flat vertical walls should be avoided through the use of stepping or tiered architectural features. 3. Greater setbacks for upper levels: Progressing from the first floor to the uppermost story of the building setbacks from the rear property line should increase and".,:. exceed minimum requirements, and the upper stories shall have tiered setbacks from the lower levels as viewed from the front. Bulk. To allow projects which exceed the maximum Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio (F.A.R.) the building design should incorporate features to minimize the appearance of bulk, and to compensate for the bulk of a building with attractive architectural features which enhance the building and which reduce the visual impact of large areas of flat vertical. walls. The Planning Commission shall consider the following guidelines in making this determination: 1. Avoid "box -like" structures: Significant and attractive architectural features should be used to break up the bulky appearance of "box -like" structures. 2. Building step -backs: Step-ins and Step -outs should be used on the front of the building to break up the bulky appearance. This could accompany varying widths of the landscape features in the front of the building. 3. Variable heights: The roof -line of the building should should be designed with variable heights, and roof patterns or materials, to avoid the appearance of a flat building. Landscaping. The objective of the landscaping requirement is to enhance the streetscape, to complement the building design, to break up the impact of vast expanses of pavement, to buffer sound and visual impacts on neighboring residential areas, to provide shade for parking areas and to deflect direct sunlight into the interior of buildings. To allow less than the minimum 570 coverage, a landscaping plan must compensate for the loss of coverage by providing a superior. design through the use of types, quantity, and location of plant materials to achieve the objectives described above. As previously recommended, more general criteria for approval or denial of precise development plans are included in the S.P.A. provisions. As previously recommended the permitted commercial uses in the S.P.A. are proposed to be the same as is currently allowed in the C-3 zone. This permits the broadest range of permitted uses for commercial zones. Given the current economic reality that development potential along P.C.H. is, at best, marginal, and giventhat it is difficult to predict the types of uses which will find this location to be profitable, staff believes that if it is desired to encourage turnover of existing development the potential uses should be as broad as possible to give developers maximum flexibility. Alternatives A. Require a Precise Development Plan for all projects except minor projects of less than 1500 square feet (previous recommendation). This approach would be most consistent with policy No. 7 for the Commercial Corridor as stated in the amended Land Use Element of the General Plan: "All new commercial projects shall require Planning Commission Review to ensure compliance with the standards and policies of the Specific Plan Area, subject to City Council appeal." Staff continues to believe that this would be a good approach to the situation, and would give the city the most control and authority to ensure that projects are designed to fit each specific situation. However, staff understands the Planning Commission's reluctance to have to review projects which by virtue of their scale, size, and height, and compliance with some basic standards will fit into the development pattern of the Highway, and not significantly impact adjacent properties. B. No Precise Development Plan required -- use the proposed 2nd tier standards as absolute standards orestablish a modified set of standards. No discretionary review would be required of projects, and no environmental review could be required for large projects. This would not be consistent with policy No. 7 of the Commercial Corridor. C. Rezone subject properties to C-3 General Commercial and consider citywide amendments to the standards of the C-3 zone as part of the update to the Land Use Element of the General Plan. In this way all general commercial areas, including the remaining portion of P.C.H. and the Aviation corridor would have the same standards and review procedures, and would be considered for amendments at the same time. The problem with this alternative is that it is not consistent with the policy No. 7 of the Commercial Corridor. Further, there would be uniformity which does not recognize the uniqueness of various segments of, the City's commercial areas. CONCUgt h /( Michael Schubach Planning Director ken Robertson Associate Planner Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution containing S.P.A. standards 2. P.C. minutes of 1/16/90 3. P.C. staff report dated 1/10/90 4. Maps _bo - Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 89-9 January 10, 1990 Regular Meeting of January 16, 1990 LOCATION: COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED: AREAS ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SOUTH OF EIGHTH STREET INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO REZONE SAID AREAS FROM C-3, R-1, R-2, R-3, AND R -P (MOSTLY C-3) TO A COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE RECENTLY AMENDED LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN Recommendation Staff is recommending that the areas designated Commercial Corridor on the General Plan, located south of 8th Street be rezoned from their current zoning classifications of C-3, R-1, R-2, R-3, and R -P (The majority being C-3) to Commercial Specific Plan Area. Staff is recommending one S.P.A, with different height requirements for the west and east side of P.C.H. Background The City Council, at their meeting of 5/9/89 amended the Land Use Element of the General Plan by eliminating the Multi -Use Corridor designation and creating the Commercial Corridor designation and applying it to a portion of the previous Multi -Use Corridor designated areas. The remaining Multi -Use Corridor designated areas were General Plan amended to residential designations. The final steps toward implementing these amendments is the establishment of specific plan area zones for the commercial areas consistent with the policies established by the Council for the Commercial Corridor. Analysis The previous efforts of the Planning Commission and the City Council, which included several public hearings, focused on defining the boundaries of commercial development along Pacific Coast Highway. Additionally, policies were established for the implementation of the Commercial Corridor. Since that has been accomplished, our effort now is to establish development standards for these areas to ensure a level of quality for the future development of this corridor which will minimize the impact on neighboring residential areas. Staff's approach was to develop standards more restrictive than those in the C-3 zone for such concerns as height and view 6i- 11 blockage, landscaping and buffering, and to address the question of the use of property currently residential fronting on side streets. EXISTING SITUATION The subject area is currently completely built out, containing a mix of commercial uses, with a focus on automotive related uses. Parking is generally inadequate, and the structures are often old and unattractive. Landscaping is sparse and infrequent, and there is an abundance of signs of various types, colors, and shapes. Yet, the strip retains a certain vibrancy, probably due to the fact that 55,000 vehicles pass through daily. Lot sizes and ownerships patterns vary significantly. The majority of lots are rather small, and ownership is fragmented limiting the potential for large commercial projects with ample parking areas. Therefore, what is likely• to occur in the future is a slow turnover of the older structures, and in a few cases the turnover of an assemblage of lots into a larger commercial use. For example the Planning Commission approved a project at 524 P.C.H and is considering another commercial improvement at 638-640 P.C.H. on this agenda. .,The following statistical information for each side of P.C.H. in ,the Commercial Corridor shows that lots are indeed rather small, and also shows that automotive uses represent a large portion of the commercial activity. The estimated parking ratio to building area shows that parking is deficient, especially on the east side of the Highway where more than half of the calculated parking belongs to GTE. SOUTH WEST Area: 8.4 acres Number of separate ownership parcels: 28 Lot Size: less than 5,000 sq. ft. 14 5,000 - 10,000 sq. ft. 4 10,000 sq. ft. plus 10 Median size: 5500 sq. ft. Est. Total Building area: 145,600 Est. No. of off-street parking: 257 Est. Parking Ratio: 1 per 560 sq. ft. Total number of businesses: 37 Types of uses: Automotive related General Retail Commercial Service Food and Beverage 16 13 3 5 SOUTH EAST Area: 7.2 acres Number of ownership lots 24 Size: less than 5,000 sq. ft. 7 5,000 - 10,000 sq. ft. 7 10,000 sq. ft. plus 10 Median Lot Size: 9000 sq. ft. Est. Building area: 181,228 sq. ft. Est. No. of Parking Spaces: 240 'Est. Parking Ratio: 1 per 755 sq. ft. Number of businesses: 29 Types of uses: Automotive Related: 8 General Retail: 13 Commercial Service: 0 Food and Beverage: 8 PROPOSALS Staff's recommendations for the Specific Plan Areas are contained in the attached resolution. Staff is recommending one Specific Plan Area which contains a different height requirements for the east and west side of P.C.H. to recognize the different impact on views to the west. All other requirements are the same for both sides of the Highway and use the existing C-3 permitted use list -63-- and existing parking requirements as currently contained in the zoning ordinance for the C-3 zone. General Standards Staff is recommending that generally any new commercial development shall front on Pacific Coast Highway or be connected with a development which fronts on the highway, and shall have direct automobile access available from the highway to any parking areas. This is to ensure that the few properties not currently commercial on separate lots facing a residential street will not impact adjacent residential property and if used commercially will be tied into the frontage property. In order to allow the continued use and upgrade and improvement of current commercial properties facing a side street, for example, 715 6th Street, and the church at 737 3rd Street, staff is recommending that any existing commercial property which does not have frontage on the highway may be continued in a commercial use, and expanded, or remodeled using same access and orientation. To be consistent with the policies •contained in Resolution No. 89-5270 property which is currently developed exclusively residentially may maintain its residential use and may be remodeled, or redeveloped residentially as long as the density does not increase. Property which contains both a.commercial and residential use would be subject to the nonconforming provisions of the zoning ordinance. Another recommendation for consistency with Resolution No. 89-5270 is that separate lots would be merged as a condition of development of an assemblage of lots. Height Staff has contacted the followingneighboring cities to compare their height requirements in their highway commercial zones. Manhattan Beach - 30' on Sepulveda Redondo Beach - 30' or 2 -stories, 40' with a C.U.P., on P.C.H. El Segundo - 200', or 100' where adjacent to residential Torrance - no height limit, all projects subject to P.C. review The closest situation to Hermosa Beach is probably Redondo Beach. Both cities have view lots above the Highway and have residential in close proximity.. However, the commercial lot sizes in Redondo Beach are larger, and the steepness of the slope heading east from P.C.H.is not quite as severe. In considering the height limit for Hermosa Beach, the primary considerations are view obstruction and to not overly restrict the use of the P.C.H. properties. The most important concern is minimize obstruction to views of the ocean. The construction of buildings along the Highway will obviously obstruct some views regardless of the height. This effect would be primarily limited to the houses on the lower portion of the slope closest to the Highway which currently only have a small "window" to the sea. Fortunately, the slopes up from P.C.H. are fairly steep, and unless high rises are built, the views further up the slopes will not be impacted. Staff is proposing the following: - On the west side of P.C.H. - 40 feet - On the east side of P.C.H. - 30 feet The reason for the different height requirements is that the lots on the east side of the highway slope upward°from the grade of P.C.H., so the effective height would be from the upper end of the slope while on the west side, the effective height would be from the grade of P.C.H. Also, the west side is a further distance from the effected view properties. Also, it should be noted that the 30 -foot height requirement on the east side is consistent with the medium density character of the properties to the east, and the height limit of 30 -feet. (Although part of this area is under a current moratorium limiting the height to 25 feet) By walking or driving through the residential areas east of P.C.H. one can get an idea of what type of impact a 30, 35, 40 or 45 -foot high building would have using, for example, the Mobil sign as a reference point (about 45 feet high), or the light poles as reference points (about 30 feet) high. In staff's judgement after walking these areas- is that the impact of a 40 -foot high structure on the west side would be roughly equivalent to that of a 30 -foot high structure on the east side. Given that it is difficult to determine exactly where the impact would be without knowing the characteristics of the individual development, staff's recommendation includes provisions for Planning Commission review of proposed developments. At this stage the Planning Commission could require renderings which show the impact, and the Commission could make their decision on each individual project with a better understanding of the impact. Landscaping Landscaping, building setbacks, and 6 -foot high block walls are already required in the C-3 zone where commercial projects abut residential properties, and these standards are included in the S.P.A., however, no specific standards for landscaping in the buffer areas are in place. For the S.P.A. staff is recommending the following standards: - Planter strips shall be a minimum of five (5) feet wide in all cases - One twenty-four (24) inch boxed tree shall be provided for each 10 feet of length of planter strip in the buffer area. Also, staff will recommend landscaping requirements for the P.C.H frontage, as well as a minimum landscaping coverage for the lot. - Planter strips, a minimum of three (3) feet wide shall be provided along the property line adjacent to P.C.H. planted with one five gallon shrub for each twenty (20) square feet of planting area. - A minimum of five (5) percent of a lot to be developed commercially shall be covered in landscaping. A plan for landscaping, and irrigation, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of a building permit, and shall be implemented on the site prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Existing Uses and Standards of C-3 Zone to be Included in S.P.A. In regards to permitted uses in the S.P.A., staff is recommending that the same permitted use list for the C-3 zone be utilized. Staff believes this area is an appropriate area for a mix of general commercial uses, and to give the widest range of possibilities for future commercial growth does not believe the uses should be restricted any more than what is currently provided for in the C-3 zone, which includes all the uses allowed in the C-1 and C-2 zones. In regard to standards, section 8-5 of the zoning ordinance sets forth standards for commercial development in all commercial "zones. These are included in the S.P.A. to the extent they are not inconsistent with the provisions of the S.P.A. These standards will be considered as minimum standards. Specifically these standards are rather limited, and include provisions regulating outdoor uses only to parking lots and those uses incidental to the primary indoor use, the requirement for building setbacks from residential areas of 8 -feet plus 2 feet for each story above, a minimum 6 -foot high block wall where commercial abuts a residentially zoned property, and landscaping adjacent to residential zones. Review Procedure Staff is proposing that commercial projects be subject to approval of a precise development plan, requiring public hearings and Planning Commission approval. In addition to site plans, floor plans and elevations, plan submission shall include a proposed plan for landscaping and signage. Projects of less than 1500 square feet would be exempted. Staff believes that review and approval of a development plan is an appropriate process to ensure development quality and will allow resident input into the project. Staff also believes that - 66 - l given the relatively small area involved where this precise development plan will apply that existing staff would be able to handle the review process. Staff is also recommending that projects of more than two (2) stories be required to submit a view impact study, containing photographs and renderings of how the building will impact views. In sum, staff believes that the S.P.A. will serve as a good tool to further regulate commercial development along the highway, without significantly impacting the potential for commercial development. It will also serve as somewhat of a "test" case for possible future application of similar standards and review procedures for other commercial areas in the city, namely the Aviation corridor, the remaining_ portion of P.C.H. notin the Commercial Corridor, and perhaps even the downtown area. It can be looked at, perhaps, as being the first step towards developing a consensus in the City of Hermosa Beach regarding the desired scope and depth of regulation of commercial development. ( /4'Ken Rob -t son Associate Planner Michael Sch ubach Associate Planner Attachments 1. General plan and zoning maps 2. Parcel maps 3. Proposed Resolution 90- 4. Resolution 89-5270 5. Public Correspondence 6. Public Notice Affidavit -69 MARINA 700 TORRANCE BOULEVARD / REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90277 / TELEPHONE (213) 543-0081 January 9, 1990 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Zone Change 89-9 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: .I object to the above referenced item. I feel the close proximity of commercial development will have an extremely adverse effect on the property adjacent to the commercial development these changes will allow. This effect will be both monetary and esthetic. Sincerely, JAN 1 i. 199n 8 aul J. Lupo for Norma F. Stoffer 535 Gravely Ct. Hermosa Beach, CA 1 XXV WELARC INCORPE REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTSORATD February 16, 1990 Michael Schubach Ken Robertson CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 F E E3 2 01990', Re: Planning Commission action concerning zoning and development restrictions, Pacific Coast Highway, Southern Section Hermosa Beach, CA Dear Mr. Schubach, Mr. Robertson and Commissioners: I appreciate the time you have given me over the past three years and in front of the planning commission to discuss the proposed developments for our site located at 125 Pacific Coast Highway. To further clarify the discussions which were presented before the commission on January 16, 1990, I would like to emphasize that .the development of commercial property along the Pacific Coast Highway corridor in the past several years and in the foreseeable future is restricted considerably by the projects economics and the uncertainty of governmental approval of specific site plan applications. Due to escalating land values, development along the south end of the Pacific Coast Highway corridor is generally limited to the following types of projects: 1. Single floor retail; 2. Single floor retail with a second floor of quasi retail/office space; 3. Single specific use projects usually 1 to 2 floors (i.e.: auto dealers, fast food, single owner -user office) ; 4. Multi -floor hotel/motel; and 5. Multi -floor office. Our work in the last three years indicates that major domestic and some imported auto dealerships are moving away to the Hawthorne Boulevard corridor where the traffic, demographics and large land parcels are more favorable. A few of the very established foreign car dealers are an obvious exception to this relo at:'.ont.,. 222 NORTH SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD • SUITE 1690 • EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNA451:1 LEYiLI.J '- TEL 213.322.1690FAX '3214WAR -69- Hotel/Motel development has flourished in the last 3 to 5 years but is presently reaching a saturation level according to local owner -operators. There may be enough market demand for one 100 room hotel/motel project in the south end of the corridor. Quality office development with high tenant improvement standards, ocean views and general class A features, is presently having a difficult time migrating south of Manhattan Beach. The high rents needed to justify the costs of multifloor subterranean parking and a quality three or four story building indicate that a tremendous amount of product absorption of existing space must occur and even then other more favorable development locations will be selected before the south end of the corridor is explored. When a development is proposed, developers in the past have been faced with a design and approval process which can take six months to more than two years depending on the project. During this time the developer is typically required to spend significant sums of money for studies (architectural, engineering, soils environmental, etc.) in addition to the normal. costs of purchasing and pre -leasing the property. In the event the project is not approved by the City or altered to the extent it is no longer economically feasable, the developer has lost a significant amount of time and money. I would like to take this opportunity to emphasize that height limitations of over thirty (30) feet are not a major factor for most 'developments, and it should not be a major concern to the city. What should be a concern is promoting development which will enhance the appearance and business along the Pacific Coast Highway corridor in the next five to ten years. A zoning ordinance which encourages development of small to medium size retail/office projects with a height limit of thirty (30) feet or less and meeting your current C-3 development criteria without specific planning commission involvement would be a major step in the right direction. In the event a developer would like to build a larger, higher and more dense project (in excess of a 1.5 floor area ratio) the developer should have to come before the planning commission and the planning staff for a through design review and approval. By adopting this type of ordinance the City would be sending a clear message to developers that the clean, economically viable development of low to medium size structures within the corridor will be permitted without further unknown contingencies applied by the City Government. Thank you. i erely, aures G. Wellbaum JGW/gls C I T Y OF HERMOSA BEACH I, the underned, do d are under penalty of perjury �, that I did on the l.G L'day of ,t. e , 199 0, deposit into the United States Post Office, first class postage prepaid, a copy of the Public Notice attached as Exhibit "A" to each and every person attached as Exhibit "Btt. I warrant that the persons named on Exhibit "B" are all the persons required by applicable law to receive the Public Notice attached as Exhibit"A". I understand and agree that it is my responsibility to cause these Public Notices to be made in an aaccurate and timely fashion and agree to hold the City harmless against any liability whatsoever for any defect of said notice or notices. In the event an action is instituted in a court of competent jurisdictiox-hich questions the legality of the Public Notices, then the City may in its exclusive discretion suspend all hearings or cause the cessation of any consturction or of any use which was permitted as a result of a hearing which was held on accordance with the Public Notice. In the event that the court declares the notice or noticing procedure to be effective, then the City may in its exclusive discretion revoke any permits granted and cause any approvals given pursuant to those Public Notices to be declared null and void and I agree on behalf of myself and my heirs, assigns or successors -in -interest to hold the City harmless in connection therewith. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. of ave executed this declaration on this the lj" `day , 199/3 at Hermosa Beach, California. (Capacity) State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) SS O t►' s the d.y of /&///, , 1990 , before me, th undersigned personally n igned Notary Public, pe ly ...•eared /1,4_„� j yl;�i�C,! and proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evi'ence to be the person(s) whose name(s) suscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SEAL) OFFICIAL SEAL LAURICE M. DUKE Notary Public. • California PRINCIPAL OFFICE. IN L. A. COUNTY My Comm. Exp. Mar. 12, 1993 9/ 5� March 20, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council March 27, 1989 (RECONSIDERATION OF ACTION TAKEN AT THE 9/26/89 MEETING) SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 89-7, AND TEXT AMENDMENT -- PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLANS INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER REQUIRING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO REQUIRE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL FOR VARIOUS TYPES OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS A MEANS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY AND TO REQUIRE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF SUCH PROJECTS Recommendation _Staff recommends adoption of the attached ordinance amending the zoning ordinance text to establish a Precise Development Plan procedure, and adoption of the attached resolution to establish fees and procedures for Precise Development Plan applications. The proposed ordinance and resolution contain the same text proposed at the 9/26/89 meeting. Background On January 23, 1990, the current City Council requested that this item be brought back for their consideration. The City Council at the September 26, 1989, meeting, considered the proposed text amendment, but chose not to approve it on a 4-1 vote. Please refer to the attached City Council Staff report of 9/26/89 for further background. Analysis Please refer to the attached City Council staff report of 9/26/89, and the Planning Commission staff report and minutes for further analysis. Alternative The provisions contained in the proposed commercial Specific Plan Area, which are also under consideration for tonight's meeting, propose to exempt commercial projects of less than 10,000 square feet and less than 1:1 floor area to lot ratio from its requirement for a Precise Development Plan. 1 If the Council adopts the Specific Plan ordinance it may therefore be desirable to include a similar type of exemption from the citywide Precise Development Plan ordinance. According to the City Attorney, however, to modify the Precise Development Plan ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission would require returning the proposed modification to the Planning Commission for consideration. Therefore, the City Council may wish to withhold action on this issue and send it back to the Planning Commission to consider a modification. Attachments: 1. Staff Report for 9/26/89 meeting 2. Proposed Ordinance and Resolution 3. P.C. Resolution No. 89-62 4. P.C. Staff Report/Minutes 8/15/89 5. Memo from Building Director CONC Michael Schubacfi Planning Director 'Kevin Northcraft City Manager plandoc/pcsrpdp en Ro•ertson Associate Planner Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 18, 1989 Regular Meeting of September 26, 1989 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 89-7, AND TEXT AMENDMENT -- PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLANS INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO EXAMINE REQUIRING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO REQUIRE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL FOR VARIOUS TYPES OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS A MEANS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY AND TO REQUIRE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF SUCH PROJECTS Recommendation Staff recommends adoption of the attached ordinance amending the zoning ordinance text to establish a Precise Development Plan procedure, and adoption of the attached resolution to establish .fees and procedures for Precise Development Plan applications. Background The Planning Commission at their August 15, 1989 meeting recommended that the City Council adopt_ the Precise Development Plan procedure. At their September 22, 1987 meeting the City Council requested that the staff study design standards, and the review process in conjunction with requiring a Precise Development Plan. Analysis Currently, the City has discretionary review over certain types of uses such as condominiums and liquor establishments, via a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), but does not require discretionary. review over commercial projects, hotels and motels, office buildings, industrial projects, or apartment buildings, no matter how large they may be. As a consequence of having no discretionary review, certain projects that may have significant environmental impacts are exempted by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines and cannot be assessed by the City for environmental impacts. a By requiring review of these projects, it would allow some opportunity to impose additional conditions of approval beyond the minimum zoning standards; it would also allow for environmental assessment and where needed, an Environmental Impact Report. This process would work to improve the quality of proposed development in many respects. i:� t To determine what size and type of projects that should require precise development plans, staff has reviewed the building department records to measure the quantity and frequency of certain types of projects not currently subject to any discretionary review. Individual single-family projects were excluded from consideration. Generally, only a few additional projects would require Planning Commission review annually since the majority of projects are condominiums which already require a C.U.P. However, the additional projects represent some if the most important projects in regards to environmental impacts, that are ever proposed in the City. (Please refer to the attachedmemo from the Building Director.) Staff determined that it would be appropriate to require Precise Development Plans for all new commercial, manufacturing, and residential projects of two (2) units or more, but to exclude remodels and additions of existing developments of less than 1,500 square feet. CON UR: ichael Schu•ach Planning Director 'Kevin Northcr,iift City Manager Attachments: Associate Planner 1. Proposed Ordinance and Resolution 2. P.C. Resolution No. 89-62 3. P.C. Staff Report 8/15/89 4. P.C. Minutes 8/15/89 5. Memo from. Building Director plandoc/pcsrpdp CITY MANAGER COMMENT: While this recommendation represents yet another procedural step for poten- tial development, it meets many positive public policy goals. This pro- cedural step will improve public discussion of projects (Goal #24) to re- duce potential commercial/residential conflicts (Goal #13) to provide design review to improve appearance (Goals #22 & #16), and better to manage our growth (Goal #3). The procedural step is noVirequired of many smaller impacts, and applying it to these other projects can be construed as closing a loophole from our efforts to expand public input about changes affecting our community. TO: FROM: Ken Robertson, Associate Planner Z._ SUBJECT: Grandfather clause for the Precise Development Plan Ordinance DATE: March 22, 1990 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council The proposed ordinance for requiring Precise Development Plans, as recommended by the Planning Commission, does not include a provision to exempt development projects which have already submitted completed building permit applications. Without such a "grandfather" clause the new ordinance would potentially be unfair to developers who have already invested in plans and studies. •Therefore, staff recommends that the following language be included in the. Precise Development Plan ordinance: This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a completed building permit package on file with the City prior to March 27, 1990. Said package must include a completed building permit application form, completed conceptual plan (plot plan, floor plan, elevation plan and similar plans, and a lot survey). Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a diligent manner and must have been issued a building permit within one (1) year of the effective date of this ordinance. Including this provision with the ordinance would be consistent with previous City Council actions when amendments or new ordinances are passed. Concur: 'Kevin Northcr,aft City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 89 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS FOR ALL PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENTS, AND FOR ALL PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS OF TWO DWELLING UNITS OR GREATER, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on September 26, 1989 and March 27,1990 and mede the following findings: 1. Discretionary review of projects is necessary to require environmental assessments for projects according to the California Environmental Quality Act (C.E.Q.A.) guidelines. 2. Examining projects on a case by case basis will improve the quality of each project, and make it more compatible with adjacent development. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby ordain that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Add the following to Article 14: DIVISION 3. PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Section 1430. Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of requiring Precise Development Plan review for development projects is to achieve a reasonable level of quality, compatibility, in harmony with the community's social, economic and environmental objectives, and to protect existing and potential developments, and uses on adjacent and surrounding property. Section 1431. Projects Requiring Review. In order to achieve the purpose of this Section, it is considered necessary to require that the use of land, and erection, construction or location of buildings or structures in any zone shall require submittal of plans for Planning Commission_review, with the exception of single-family residences and re1odels.or additions of less than 1,500 s uare feet. 3 2 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 1432. Standards and Review Criteria. A. Standards. All development shall be in compliance with minimum standards of the zoning ordinance. On a case basis, the Planning Commission may impose standards above the minimums designated by the zoning ordinance to improve the quality of development and to mitigate any environmental impacts. B. General Criteria. In considering the Precise Development Plan for any development, the following criteria for granting or conditionally granting said permit shall be considered: 1. Distance from existing residential uses in relation to negative effects. 2. The amount of existing or proposed off-street parking in relation to actual need. 3. The combination of uses proposed, as they relate to compatibility. 4. The relationship of the estimated generated traffic volume and the capacity and safety of streets serving the area. 5. The proposed exterior signs and decor, and the compatibility thereof with existing establishments in the area. 6. Building and driveway orientation in relation to sensitive uses, e.g., -residences and schools. 7. Noise, odor, dust and/or vibration that may be generated by the proposed use. 8. Impact of the proposed use to the city's infrastructure, and/or services. 9. Adequacy of mitigation measures to minimize environmental impacts in quantitative terms. 10. Other considerations that, in the judgment of the Planning Commission, are necessary to assure compatibility with the surrounding uses, and the city as a whole. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C. Criteria for denial. 1. The proposed development would substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity or interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in such area, because of excessive dissimilarity or inappropriateness of design in relation to the surrounding vicinity, and there are no known conditions of approval which can be imposed that could resolve such problems. 2. The proposed development would have significant environmental adverse impacts which are not mitigable, and where the finding of overriding considerations cannot be made. Section 1435. Appeals. The decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by filing a written appeal within ten (10) days of the Planning Commission's decision. Section 1436. Compliance. A. An approved Plan shall be valid for a one (1) year period and, should development fail to commence within such' time limitation and no extension is granted, shall become null and void. B. No person shall violate or fail to comply with any approved plan or any condition or provision thereof, nor shall a building permit be issued for any building or structure which would violate or fail to comply with an approved Plan. Section 1437. General Procedures. - Application for Precise Development Plan review shall be filed and approval given prior to the issuance o building permits. An application shall consist of detailed and fully dimensioned site plans, buildin plans, floor plans, architectural drawings an• elevations, landscape plans and/or any other dat found to be reasonably required Applications shall be submitted to the City Plannin Department and shall be in compliance with th department's specific requirements. Fees shall be set by policy of the City Council. 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 2. Amend Article 20. PENALTY, to add the followin underlined statements: Sec. 20-3 Violation of conditions of conditional us permits "and precise development plans" No person shall violate any conditions of a 'conditiona use permit or "precise development plan." Any perso violating any of the said conditions shall .be guilty of a infraction. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in ful force and effect from and after thirty (30) days o its final passage and adoption. SECTION 4. The City Council shall designate the City Attorney t prepare a summary of this ordinance to be publishe pursuant to Government Code Section 36933(c) (1) i lieu of the full text of said ordinance. Prior t the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date o its adoption, the City Clerkshall cause the summar to be :published in the Easy Reader, a weekl newspaper of general circulation, published an circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage an adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same i the book of original ordinances of said city, an shall make, minutes of the passage and adoptio thereof in the records of the proceedings of the Cit Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED,; and ADOPTED this day o 1990. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: plandoc/perspdp CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C RESOLUTION 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH THE PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS, TIME. FRAMES, AND FEES FOR SUBMISSION OF PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLANS. WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary that procedural requirements, and fees for Precise Development Plan applications be set forth: NOW THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve as follows: A. The Planning Department shall accept applications for Precise Development Plans; B. Applicants shall submit a completed general application form containing the signature of the property owner, and all required plans; C. A fee of $320.00 shall be included with the application in addition to any required fees for environmental review ($230); D. The Planning Department shall submit for public hearing before the Planning Commission applications for approval of a Precise Development Plan. The applicant shall be required to accomplish the public noticing. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby set forth the above procedures for applying for a Precise Development Plan. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this , 1990. day of PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY p/perspdp 84CHOROUND MATER/AC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 89-62 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING' ADOPTION OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS FOR ALL PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENTS, AND FOR ALL PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS. OF TWO DWELLING UNITS OR GREATER, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on August 15, 1989 and made the following findings: 1. A need for discretionary review is necessary to require environmental assessments for projects according to the California Environmental Quality Act (C.E.Q.A.) guidelines. 2. Examining projects on a case basis will improve the quality of each project, and make it more compatible with adjacent development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby recommend the following amendments to the zoning ordinance: Section 1. Title. Precise Development Plans. Section 2. Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of requiring Precise Development Plan review is to achieve a reasonable level of quality, compatibility, in harmony with the community's social, economic and environmental objectives, and to protect existing and potential developments, and uses on adjacent and surrounding property Section 3. Projects Requiring Review. In order to achieve the purpose of this Section, it is considered necessary to require that the use of land, and erection, construction or location of buildings or structures in any zone with the exception of single family residences, remodels and expansion of less than 1,500 Sq. Ft. in any zone shall require submittal of plans for Planning Commission review. Section 4. Standards and Review Criteria. 1 2 3 4 5 •6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A. Standards. All development shall be in compliance with minimum standards of the zoning ordinance. On a case basis, the Planning Commission may impose standards above the minimums designated by the zoning ordinance to improve the quality of. development and to mitigate 'any environmental impacts. B. General Criteria. In considering the granting of any Precise Development Plan for any development, the following criteria for granting or conditionally granting said permit shall be considered: 1. Distance from existing residential uses in relation to negative effects. 2. The amount of existing or proposed off-street parking, in relation to actual need. 3. The combination of uses proposed, as they relate to compatibility. 4. The relationship of the estimated generated traffic volume and the capacity and safetyof streets serving the area. 5. The proposed exterior signs and decor, and the compatibility thereof with existing establishments in the area. 6. Building and driveway orientation in relation to sensitive uses, e.g., residences and schools. 7. Noise, odor, dust and/or vibration that may be generated by the proposed use. 8. Impact of the proposed use to the city's infrastructure, and/or services. 9. Adequacy of mitigation measures to minimize environmental impacts in quantitative terms. 10. Other considerations that, in the judgment of the Planning Commission, are necessary to assure compatibility with the surrounding uses, and the city as a whole. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C. Criteria for denial. 1. The proposed development would substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity or interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in such area, because of excessive dissimilarity or inappropriateness of design in relation to the surrounding vicinity, and there are no known conditions of approval which can be imposed that could resolve such problems. 2. The proposed development would have significant environmental adverse impacts which are not mitigable, and where the finding of overriding considerations cannot be made. Section 5. Appeals. The decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by filing a written appeal within ten (10) days of the Planning Commission's decision. Section 6. Compliance. A. An approved Plan shall be valid for a one (1) year period and, should development fail to commence within such time limitation and no extension is granted, shall become null and void. B. No person shall violate or fail to comply with any approved plan or any condition or provision thereof, nor shall a building permit be issued for any building or structure which would violate or fail to comply with an approved Plan. Section 7. General Procedures. Application for Precise Development Planreview shall be filed and approval given prior to the issuance of building permits and shall be accompanied by detailed and fully dimensioned site plans, building plans, floor plans, architectural drawings and elevations, landscape plans and/or any other data found to be reasonably required Applications shall be submitted to the City Planning Department and shall be in compliance with the department's specific requirements. Fees shall be set by policy of the City Council. (p - 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 VOTE: AYES: Comms. Ingell,Ketz,Chmn.Rue NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm.Peirce CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 89-62 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California a their re:ular i-eting of August 15, 1989.--,, / �/ a ^ v• I jfl ee Rue, Chairman Date plandoc/perspdp Michael -Sc u August 8, 1989 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning commission August 15, 1989 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 87-7, AND TEXT AMENDMENT -- PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLANS INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO EXAMINE REQUIRING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUIRING PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL FOR VARIOUS TYPES OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS A MEANS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY AND TO REQUIRE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF SUCH PROJECTS Recommendation Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution recommending to the City Council that a precise Development Plan procedure be adopted. Background At the September 22, 1987 meeting the City Council requested that the staff study design standards, and the review process in conjunction with requiring a Precise Development Plan. Analysis Currently, the City has discretionary review over certain types of uses such as condominiums and liquor establishments, via a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), but does not require discretionary review over such developments as hotels no matter how large they may be. As a consequence of having no discretionary review, certain projects that may have significant environmental impacts are exempted by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines and cannot be assessed by the City for environmental impacts. By requiring review of these projects, it would allow some opportunity to impose additional conditions of approval beyond the minimum zoning standards; it would also allow for environmental assessment and where needed, an Environmental Impact Report. This process would work to improve the quality of proposed development in many respects. Other cities within the area have been contacted regarding project review. The following notes when discretionary review is required: -i2- 0 TORRANCE Residential a. Condominium projects require CUP b. All Projects in R-3 Zone c. Anything exceeding 2 stories or 0.6 (FAR)* requires. Cup Commercial a. Projects that exceed 0.5 (FAR)* b. Projects exceeding 15,000 Sq. Ft. c. Projects exceeding 2 stories d. Projects exceeding 35 feet in height e. All projects in C-2 or C-3 require Planning Commission Review Manufacturing a. Anything exceeding 15,000 Sq. Ft b. Projects exceeding 45 feet in height * (FAR) = Floor_ Area to Lot Area Ratio (Floor Area Ratio) REDONDO BEACH Residential a. All projects in R-3 and R-4 zones b. Anything exceeding 2 stories or 30 feet maximum Commercial a. Projects exceeding 2 stories or 30 feet in height Industrial a. Projects exceeding 2 stories or 30 feet in height -/3- EL SEGUNDO Residential a. Anything containing 6 units; in Multi -Family Zone b. If more than 3 units; in Single -Family Zone Commercial a. Anything above 15,000 Sq. Ft. Industrial a. Anything above 15,000 Sq. Ft. LAWNDALE Residential a. Any subdivision (Includes Condominiums) Commercial a. Anything that requires Special Use Permit (SUP) b. Anything over 65 feet that requires SUP c. All alcohol beverages permits Industrial a. All industrial projects that require SUP ROLLING HILLS Residential a. Any new projects that require a variance b. Remodeling over 25% c. Site plan review for compatibility Commercial a. Any projects that require CUP Industrial No industrial area PALOS VERDES Residential a. Total floor area is greater than 30% of the lot size plus 1,000 Sq. Ft. b. An addition greater than 1,000 Sq. Ft. c. Second level additions d. Floor area greater than 12,000 Sq. Ft. e. Cumulative applications in the last 24 months that equals a through d above Commercial a. Any cut of fill greater than 10 feet in height b. If geology or soils report is requested by the Building Official c. All the projects that require over 250 cubic yards of grading d. Cumulative grading other than the -foundation and driveway exceeding 100 cubic yards of grading HAWTHORNE Residential a. All the Condominiums b. All the redevelopment projects Commercial a. All the redevelopment projects b. All the projects with 4 or more stories Industrial a. All the redevelopment projects As it can be seen from reviewing other cities, discretionary review is required based on various criteria. In ,Hermosa Beach many residential projects are under 6 units, and most commercial, or manufacturing projects are relatively small. However, the cumulative impact can be significant. Particularly in regard to the sewer and fire flow problems which currently exist. Based on the above, staff believes that discretionary review should be required for all commercial and manufacturing projects, and for all residential projects over 2 units. It should be noted that currently 2 unit condominiums require a CUP but rental units of any number require no review at all. In conjunction with the Precise Development Plan process, a map of problem areas related to fire, sewer, flooding and parking should also be included since recently the state added an exemption section to CEQA which exempts projects of 6 or less units. However, Section 15300.2 of the guidelines allows a city the opportunity to identify locations in the City via a map where such projects could have an impact, and therefore, are not exempt. In this City, areas, where sewer, water, flooding and parking are a critical problem, could be identified and a map of those areas could be officially adopted. plandoc/pcsrpdp -/6- Michael Schubach Planning Director TEXT AMENDMENT. TO REQUIRE PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR NON - DISCRETIONARY PROJECTS AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated August 8, 1989. Staff recommended adoption of the proposed resolution recommending to the City Council that a precise development plan procedure be adopted. I - P.C. Minutes 8/15/89 At the September 27, 1989, meeting, the City Council requested that the staff study design standards and the review process in conjunction with requiring a precise development plan. Currently the City has discretionary review over certain types of uses such as condominiums and liquor establishments, via a conditional use permit, but does not require discretionary review over such developments as hotels, no matter how large they may be. As a consequence of having no discretionary review, certain projects that may have significant environmental impacts are exempted by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines and cannot be assessed by the City for additional environmental impacts. By requiring review of these projects, it would allow some opportunity to impose additional conditions of approval beyond the minimum zoning standards; it would also allow for environmental assessment and where needed, an environmental impact report. This process would work to improve the quality of proposed development in . many respects. Staff provided information on other cities which have a discretionary review process; i.e., Torrance, Redondo Beach, El Segundo, Lawndale, Rolling Hills, Palos Verdes, and Hawthorne. Mr. Schubach, in response to a question from Chmn. Rue regarding the amount of staff and Commission time which would be involved, stated that he did not feel a great deal of time would be expended as a result of this text amendment because almost all projects are condos of between two and six units at this time. He noted that no apartments have been built in several years. He explained that condos require discretionary review. He stated that the target is commercial and manufacturing; however,there has been no new manufacturing use in many years. In regard to commercial, hotels would now be reviewed before approval. He continued by explaining that an attempt is being made to remedy inequities between reviews for apartments and condos. "Chmn. Rue noted concern over the statement in Section 3, Projects Requiring Review, ...remodels and expansion of less than 1500 square feet in any zone shall require submittal of plans for Planning Commission approval." He questioned how much staff time and Commission time would be involved. Mr. Schubach, in response to questions from Chmn. Rue, stated that the Building Department would have actual figures on the number of commercial and residential remodels. He stated that the 1500 square foot figure could be adjusted if so desired by the Commission. Chmn. Rue stated that he would like to know the impact that that requirement could create. Mr. Schubach, in response to a question by Comm. Ketz, stated that this review would require noticing and a public hearing. Chmn. Rue noted that a big concern of the City is that projects are going in with no discretionary approval, and they can be very large, bulky, and eyesores. He asked whether certain projects can be keynoted to trigger a discretionary approval. He questioned whether all remodels and projects need to be approved. He said that most cities use a figure of 15,000 square feet. He suggested that the actual figure be addressed. P.C. Minutes 8/15/89 Mr. Schubach noted that specific plan areas will require special review. He continued by discussing various remodels which have been occurring in the city, stating that most of them are not very large. Mr. Lee stated that other cities use a site plan review process, where the majority of the site plans are subject to staff review. Criteria have been set for sensitive uses which trigger the full review process by the Planning Commission. If there is a concern oyer commercial uses, he said he could provide additional information as to what other cities use to trigger a review and full hearing process. Comm. Inge11 noted, however, that almost all projects in this city would trigger the review process because so many commercial uses are so close to residential.. Mr. Schubach stated that a section could be added whereby the majority of projects go through an. administrative review process; however, certain sensitive projects could trigger the full review process. He said an administrative review board could be created to review the projects. Public Hearing opened at 8:40 P.M. by Chmn. Rue. Sandra Pfister, 903 8th Street, asked whether this review process is an attempt on the part of the City to enforce the new general plan so that everything in the City will be in conformance. Mr. Schubach explained that this is an attempt to ensure better quality projects and allow for case-by-case study of projects to ensure that commercial and residential uses do not conflict. The Commissioners went through the actual resolution section by section. The following changes were recommended: (1) Section 2, Purpose and Intent: "The purpose and intent of requiring Precise Development Plan review is to achieve a high level of quality, compatibility, and harmony with the community's...." (2) Section 3, .Projects Requiring Review, "Inorder to achieve the purpose of this Section, it is considered necessary to require that the use of land, and erection, construction or location of buildings or structures in any zone with the exception of single-family residences...." (3) Section 7, General Procedures, "Application for Precise Development Plan review shall be filed and approval given prior to the issuance of building permits...." Comm. Ketz felt that the ordinance will tighten up development loopholes in the City. Carl Moore, 1100 Loma Drive, noted concern over overpromise on what the Commission can do here, especially in the criteria for denial. He noted that there are many frustrations of working with the zoning ordinance. He noted that the main objective is to get at incremental growth in the City. Public Hearing closed at 8:53 P.M. 9— P.C. Minutes 8/15/89 k MOTION by Comm. Ingell, seconded by Comm. Ketz, to approve Resolution P.C. 89-62 as amended above. Chmn. Rue noted concern over the fact that the impacts are not known in regard to the amount of time necessary. He stated that he would like information from the Building Department in regard to the actual number of projects which would be involved. Mr. Schubach suggested that the motion be approved with the condition that staff consider the number of projects and bring that to the attention of the City Council so that they can decide whether the square footage should be changed or when the review process should be triggered. He said that information could be presented as to how many cases would be triggered depending on the various square footages. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION by Comm. Ingell as maker and agreed to by Comm. Ketz as second, to follow Mr. Schubach's recommendation as noted above. AYES: Comm. Ingell, Ketz, Chmn. Rue NOES: None ABSTAIN:. None ABSENT: Comm. Peirce a. — 2c P.C. Minutes 8/15/89 s CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Schubach, Planning Director FROM: William Grove, Building & Safety Director RE: Permit Information DATE: September 19, 1989 Pursuant to your request, I have compiled the number of permits which were issued in the past year (since 9/1/89) which would have been subject to the proposed Precise Development Plan review process. The department issued 42 permits for condominium projects, 2 permits for duplex projects, 1 permit for a commercial project (hotel) and zero permits for apartment projects of three or more units. This is not necessarily representative of a "typical" year in types of development. Under different economic conditions, it may be that rental housing will once again gain in popularity with developers. 4 a • TELECOPIER 1213) 376-3531 NEWTON AND NEWTON 555 PIER AVENUE, SUITE 4 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 TELEPHONE (2131 372-4636 September 25, 1989 Honorable June Williams, Mayor, City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 WESTWOOD OFFICE 10880 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD SUITE 1900 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90024 (213) 208-7300 Re: Text Amendment - "Precise Development Plan" City Council Agenda Item No. 6 Dear Madam Mayor: We are writing this letter to express our concern over the proposed "Precise Development Plan" now under consideration by the City Council. Our initial review of this proposed ordinance leads us to believe it.might better be called the "Imprecise Development Plan". Instead`of having a body of law which will put the citizens of this community on notice as to what they may or may not build on property owned by them, the Council now seems to be inclined to adopt an ordinance allowing for discretionary review of all new commercial and multi -unit residential development, irrespective of the fact that a 15roject is designed to meet existing code. We fear that the result of such an ordinance will be to politicize and polarize our community more than already exists. We own commercial property on Pier Avenue. If we should decide to tear it down and build anew, we currently can consult with our architect and review our building codes to determine what can be built. How- ever, under the proposed text amendment, we will be subject to discretionary review if someone alleges our project has a negative affect on existing residential uses, or if our project is not "compa- tible with the surrounding uses, and the city as a whole". On its face, this does not sound unreasonable. However, who will make the discretionary decision which amounts to no more than whether or not you like our project? The answer seems to be the Planning Commission followed by the City Council. In essence, the political process will dictate the viability of our project, and not the rule of law or applicable statute. We do not want to throw our property rights into the political arena. Neither can we imagine anyone else who would want to invest in our community under this proposed standard. We will abide by your — zz- SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 6 ti Honorable June Williams Page Two r°�7.Yf rules, but fear your whims. If you want to limit the size an,,, scope ofdevelopment, the way to approach that subject is to set' forth objective, defined limits on building size within the existing building code. Then, at least, we know our rights. Under the current'proposal, we are left totally to your discretion. To those who would argue that our fears over the politicali- zation of land use in Hermosa Beach are unwarranted, we would simply point out what we believe to be the genesis of the proposed text amendment. A developer has submitted plans which in all respects are in conformity with our current building codes. Because some do not like the project, we suddenly now have a proposed change in the rules allowing a majority of the body politic to ban a project on some ill-defined, illusory standard founded in the concept of "compatability". We suggest that the vagueness of the ordinance will not withstand legal scrutiny, and would be patently discriminatory to even a casual observer of City Council. In closing, since we will be unable to attend the scheduled public hearing on this measure, we request that this letter be read aloud as our testimony on the subject at the appropriate time. cc: Council Member Jim Rosenberger Council Member Etta Simpson Council Member Chuck Sheldon Council Member Roger Creighton Kevin Northcraft, City Manager Michael Schubach, Planning Director CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM DATE: March 22, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft RE: Comments on concept of Precise Development Plan ***************************************************************** The Precise Development Plan concept is a part of the recommenda- tions of the first two public hearings on the March 27, 1990 agenda. Since the Council is likely to treat those recommenda- tions similarly, these comments are intended to apply to the con- cept under both agenda items. As you know, the City Council has grappled with the concept of a precise development plan previously. It raises fairly strong and conflicting philosophical issues. On the one side, the concept can be viewed as an increase in the bureaucratic red tape, it further seeks to limit an individual's property rights, and it could be interpreted as discouraging development. On the other side, the absence of a discretionary review process risks the community to suffer permanently from the poor judgment of an owner or developer, potentially creates negative impacts on neighbors and the whole City. Certainly the trend in California is to prevent unintended nega- tive impacts of development by increasing the public and elected bodies opportunity to review, condition and potentially modify or deny proposed projects. This is a purpose of the California En- vironmental Quality Act, and our own conditional use permit pro- cess via staff and Planning Commission. The latter is designed to reduce the negative impacts on our community and particularly on the neighborhood in which a development resides. In our City, it seems the philosophical issue is largely decided. We require discretionary review if many businesses wish to rent video tapes, if their is any change in an auto dealership's operation, if a liquor license is desired, if a snack shop wishes to serve sandwiches, and if a developer wishes to build a two - unit condo, among other requirements. Because of these current requirements, all of which have less impact than a large apart- ment or commercial building, the fact that the latter do not cur- rently require discretionary review can readily be interpreted as a "loophole" in our requirements. Accordingly, it is appropriate for us to establish the concept of a precise development plan to allow the public bodies and our citizens an opportunity to review and comment on development that may well affect the quality of life in our City for decades to come. This meets the Council's goals to enhance public awareness (No. 1), to review our building standards (No. 6), to equally SUPPLEMENTAL - 1 - INFORMATION 6 enforce our laws (No. 12), and to improve the quality of life (No. 17). To try to balance the conflicting philosophical issues, it is appropriate to consider limits on the review so that it does not become unnecessarily burdensome. While not every project needs discretionary review, obviously the concern for the quality of life, and our dense population, require a fairly low threshold above which discretionary review is required. Staff has sugges- ted that threshold be at remodels above 1,500 sq. ft., while the Planning Commission has recommended 10,000 sq. ft. Given our current code, a 10,000 sq. ft. building would probably necessitate almost an equal size square footage in parking. A combination of those two could have a dramatic effect on a neigh- borhood, in eigh-borhood,in terms of traffic, parking, aesthetics, noise, and shadows. It seems appropriate that discretionary approval apply to buildings of that size to protect the neighbors and to assure that our new developments have mitigated negative impacts to the extent possible, in exchange for the positive impacts that they bring. An example of a building that would be exempt from discretionary review under the 10,000 sq. ft. requirement would be the struc- ture that houses the Comedy and Magic Club, though a new building certainly would require considerably more parking. I think the protection of our residents dictate that the Council consider a threshold for applying discretionary review below 10,000 sq. ft.; the staff recommendation has been 1,500 sq. ft/ March 20, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Regular meeting of Members of the City Council March 27, 1990 SUBJECT: FINAL CIRCULATION, TRANSPORTATION, AND PARKING ELEMENT REPORT PURPOSE: TO EXAMINE THE FINAL DOCUMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ADOPTED RESOLUTION WHICH MODIFIED THE DRAFT DOCUMENT Recommendation Staff recommends adoption of the proposed Final Circulation, Transportation, and Parking element report, and for staff to prepare the environmental assessment based on this project. Alternative: If there are additional changes over and beyond those that have already been noted and adopted, staff recommends those changes be brought back at the second quarter General Plan amendments public hearing in July when the environmental assessment will be completed. Note additional changes in the text related to the already adopted modifications can be resolved immediately. Background At the January 23, 1990 public hearing Resolution 90-5339 was adopted which modified the draft General Plan Element, and indicated that a public hearing would be held "when returned for adoption as revised per this resolution". Analysis Staff has examined the final document in regard to the goals, objectives, policies, programs, and general text to make certain that the document has been modified appropriately in relationship to the City Council resolution modifying the document. The following notes the policies changed: Policy Pages 1.8 10, 42 2.2 11, 16 3.0 12, 53 4.1 14, 17- 2.2 12, 16 The recommendation section for Circulation is found on page 32. Only one change is noted i.e. Gould Avenue to a local street (Resolution item #10). All other recommended items have been deleted per the City Council Resolution 90-5339. The Transportation recommendation section, starting on page 44, has the entire section concerning "Bike Routes for Commuting Cyclists" removed; this section had recommended a bike path on the Greenbelt (Resolution change #11). Also, "Truck Route Recommendations" section has been removed in compliance with Resolution Modification No. 12. As for the Parking section of the document, the following notes where the City Council resolution changes can be found: Resolution No. Page/Paragraph #13 61 2 14 (removed from document) 15 60 5 *16 12 & 16 2 & 5 17 64 3 18 20 3 also 32 6 *Although this implementation policy is general, staff believes it is adequate to satisfy Item 16 of the City Council Resolution. Environmental assessment Once this document is adopted, staff may then proceed with the environmental assessment of the project. This portion of the process is in the Consultant's contract as an Environmental Impact Report (E.I.R.) However, since the plan is to essentially leave the existing situation as is, staff believes only a negative declaration will be necessary, and the City may be able to save $14,000. CONCUR: Kevin B. Northcr, City Manager Res.ectfully submitted, chael Schu ach Planning Director Attachments 1. Proposed resolution for adoption 2. City Council Resolution No.. 90-5339 3. Matrix of issues discussed at public hearing of January 23, 1990 4. Minutes of January 23, 1990 5. Correspondence plandoc/ccsrfinl 2 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT THE FINAL CIRCULATION, TRANSPORTATION, AND PARKING ELEMENT REPORTDATED MARCH, 1990 AND TO HAVE AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PREPARED. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on March 27, 1990 to receive oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. The said document is a state mandated General Plan Element; B. The document revises the current Circulation Element; C. An environmental assessment is necessary, and an Environmental Impact Report may be necessary to meet the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act; D. The changes, modifications and deletions required by City Council Resolution No. 90-5339 have been made to the subject document. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby adopt the Circulation, Transportation, and Parking Element report, dated March, 1990, and directs an Environmental Assessment be prepared. ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: (1 �� CITY ATTOR PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California 3 P/ccrescir BACKGROUND AI/ITER/41 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 90- 5339 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT THE MODIFICATIONS, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS AS NOTED BELOW TO THE REVISED CIRCULATION, TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on December 12, 1989 and January 9, 1990 to receive oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. The said document is a state mandated General Plan Element; B. The document revises the current Circulation Element; C. When the General Plan is returned for adoption as revised per this resolution, there will be a public hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby adopt the following modifications, deletions and additions (note: Page numbers correspond to the subject document) to the Circulation, Transportation and Parking Element of the General Plan prepared by DKS Associates, June, 1989: 1. Eliminate recommendation to implement parking restriction on Pacific Coast Highway southbound during peak commute hours. (P. 32-33) 2. Eliminate turn restrictions onto residential streets from Pacific Coast Highway during peak commute hours recommendation. (P. 33) 3. Eliminate widening of eastbound/westbound approaches at Prospect Avenue/Artesia Boulevard. (P.33) 4. Eliminate signalize following intersections recommendation: 1. Gould Avenue/Valley Drive/Ardmore Avenue 2. Pier Avenue/Valley Drive/Ardmore Avenue 3. Ardmore Avenue/21st Street 4. Hermosa Avenue/8th Street 5. Manhattan Avenue/27th Street/Greenwich Village Eliminate removing street parking along east side of Ardmore Avenue for 80 feet prior to side streets - 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th recommendation. (P. 37) 6. Eliminate widening of Ardmore Avenue from Pier Avenue to 1st Street. (P. 37) 7. Eliminate reclassifying the following streets from local to collector based on traffic volume: 1. Valley Drive (Pier Avenue to north border) 2. Ardmore Avenue (Pier Avenue to 2nd Street) • n..♦ 4....:.•••••••••;;;r4,.' N.Yv.�Y.A♦.�aJr..M.N ri '�:t�fnrl �.i{/i�lvr �y.r ♦ . .rrV._ � - — .Q� ti —_ .1}v 1 2 3 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. Highland Avenue (Longfellow Avenue to north border) 4. Longfellow Avenue(Ardmore Avenue to Manhattan Avenue) 8. Eliminate recommendation to cul-de-sac 4th Street just west of Ardmore Avenue and eliminate connecting 5th Street to 3rd Street west of Ardmore Avenue as an alternative for parking on Ardmore Avenue (see figure 12). (P. 38) 9. Eliminate one-waying of streets in general. (P. 38) 10. Add Gould Avenue to be changed from collector to local street designation. 11. Eliminate bike path along the greenbelt recommendation. (P. 58). 12. Eliminate creating limited truck routes along the following: 1. Gould Avenue (Pacific Coast Highway to Morningside Drive) 2. 27th Street (Morningside Drive to Greenwich Village) 3. Hermosa Avenue (Greenwich Village to Pier Avenue) 4. Manhattan Avenue north City limit to 27th Street 13. Modify recommendation concerning parking structure as follows: Study providing a parking structure downtown to enhance business possibly on northwest corner Pier Avenue/Manhattan Avenue; possibly trade land to obtain site. (P. 71) 14. Delete providing residential parking structures in some neighborhoods recommendation. (P. 70) 15. Change title "non-residential" to "commercial". (P. 71) 16. Add study of traffic intrusion on Monterey Boulevard / two-way traffic on Valley Drive between 2nd Street and Herondo Street in future. 17. Add study of angle parking on Hermosa Avenue to improve parking and create bicycle lane in future. In addition the recommendation by the Planning Commission to prohibit left turns onto Prospect Avenue south bound at Aviation Boulevard during peak traffic hours is eliminated. 18. Add notation that local residential streets include those streets predominantly residential in terms of adjacent property use, and are intended to retain a residential character. PASS J9 APPROV ', .nd ADO/PT- DO'T.4 is 23rd day of January, 1990. t / o PRE'IDE O of e Ci ` Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: - s- EXHIBIT -A- PG. ISSUE RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DKS 32 Eliminate parking lane and add southbound lane along PCH during peak hour traffic 33 Add "no left turn" signs as determined appropriate by staff along PCH to improve traffic flow. No consensus-C.M.& P Recommend approval W. Dir: desire emer- gency & high occu- rPancy vehicles only Recommend approval Recommend approval Recommend approval Recommend approval 33 Widening of eastbound/westbound approaches at Prospect/Artesia to provide additional capacity. Recommend denial Recommend against error in data from consultant, no need to widen. Level of Service E or D 34 Signalize following intersections: 1. Gould/Valley/Ardmore 2. Pier/Valley/Ardmore 3. Ardmore/21st St. 4. Hermosa/8th St. 5. Manhattan/27th/Greenwich Village Eliminate street parking along eastside of Ardmore for 80 feet Prior to side streets - 3rd, 4th 5th, 6th and 7th for safety sake No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Recommend against Should be consider- ed for safety reasons while limit- ing parking loss, if street not widened. support parking removal 37 Study widening of Ardmore from Pier Ave. to 2nd St in near future, and from 2nd to 1st St. after the completion of recently approved development Recommend approval Recommend approval (Note: Widening would impact the Greenbelt) Recommend approval 37 Reclassify the following streets from local to collector based on traffic volume: 1. Valley Dr.(Pier to north border) 2. Ardmore Ave.(Pier to 2nd St.) 3. Highland (Longfellow to north border) 4. Longfellow (Ardmore to Manhattan Ave.) Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve --Continued EXHIBIT "A" PG. ISSUE RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DKS 38 38 Cul-de-sac 4th St. just west of Ardmore; connect 5th St. to 3rd St. west of Ardmore as alternative (see figure 12) parking for Ardmore eastside One-waying of streets in general Recommend against Recommend against Recommend against Recm'd approval only with the provision that it is desired by neighborhood and a survey conducted Figure 12 should be retitled as an alterna- tive Approve where warranted and accepted Gould Ave. changed from collector to local street designation Prohibit left hand turn at peak traffic hour onto Prospect south- bound from Aviation Blvd. Recommend against and speed should stay 35 mph Study this issue once parking lane on PCH is converted to traffic lane during peek hours to see if problems persist Recm'd against & no speed should be in- cluded in document Recommend against Concur with Planning Commission but study issue only if park- ing lane is convert- ed to traffic lane. Concur with Planning Commission 58 Bike path along the greenbelt Recommend against No consensus among staff, but do agree to study more bike routes in City. A paved bike path is inconsistent with passive nature of the greenbelt Greenbelt is best loca- tion for bike path 61 Create limited truck routes along the following: 1. Gould Ave (PCH to Morningside) 2. 27th ST. (Morningside to Green- wich Village. 3. Hermosa Ave. (Greenwich Village to Pier Ave.) 4. Manhattan Ave. north City limit to 27th St. Recommend against Recommend against Recommend against Recommend against Recommend against Recommend against Recommend against Recommend against O.K. to delete (Concur with P1. Commission) 71 Providing a parking structure down- town to enhance business possibly on northwest corner Pier/Manhattan Ave; possibly trade land to obtain site. Recommend approval Concur with Planning Commission; also ex- plore other loca- tions & finanings alternatives includ- ing an assessment district. Concur with staff 2 -- Continued EXHIBIT "A" PG. ISSUE 70 Provide residential parking structures to elevate parking deficiency in some neighborhoods RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION Recommend against; STAFF DKS instead examine in- creasing required parking per dwelling via zoning ordinance Recommend approval I Not recom- with stipulation I mended neighborhood approves or upon request as I alternative to re- I required on-site parking 71 Planning Commission request to change title "non-residential" to "commercial" on page 71 Recommend approval Recommend approval Concur with Planning Commission Traffic intrusion on Monterey/ two-way traffic on Valley between 2nd and Herondo (Refer to Exhibit "C") Did not comment Recommended to add to Circulation Element - need to study matter. Did not study matter 71 Angle parking on Hermosa Avenue to improve parking and create bicycle lane Did not comment but received memo from P.W. Recommend to add to Circulation Element - need to study Matter in future Recommend against C p/exhibita 3 Final Action: To adopt Resolution No. 90-5339, enti- tled, "A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE MODIFICATIONS, ADDI- TIONS AND DELETIONS AS NOTED BELOW TO THE REVISED CIR- CULATION, TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN", with the amendment that when the General Plan, as revised per the Resolution, comes back for adoption, there be another Public Hearing. Motion Midstokke, second Wiemans. So ordered, noting the absence of Councilmember Sheldon. (h Recommendation to approve waiver of parking fees for tide Sand and Strand Run on Sunday, February 11, 1990. Mes•o- randum from Acting Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated January 4, 1990. (i) (J) (k) tion: To approve staff recommendation to waiv paking fees and time limits for meters along P er Ave e (from Manhattan Avenue to the Municipa Pier) and on He osa Avenue between 8th and 16th Stree-s during the:,Sa • and Strand Run on Sunday, February 11, 1990 between he hours of 7:00 A.M. and Noon. Motion Es--rtier, second Midstokke. So • dered,noting the absence of Councilmember Sheldon. Recommendatio to authorize Mayor to ign agreement for preliminary Eng eering Services foo Community Center Electrical Upgra.- to John Snyder nd Associates at a cost of $5,880. (•ontinued from •anuary 9, 1990 meet- ing.) Memorandum f •m Public We ks Director Anthony Antich dated January 6, 1990. Addressing the Council w:s: Howard Longacre - 1221 Se nth Place Action: To Receive and ile Motion Midstokke, second Esser.ier. So ordered, noting the absence of Counc member Sh- don. Recommendation to •prove schedule or Environmental Impact Report, Gefieral Plan amendmen., Conditional Use Permit, and Leaae Agreement for oil p •duction. (Con- tinued from Ja ary 9, 1990 meeting.) emorandum from Planning Dire for Michael Schubach dated anuary 17, 1990. Recommendation to receive and file the follow'.ng 1988-89 Financial reports: 1) C9mprehensive Annual Financial and Audit re ort, nd 2) Management Letter. Mexporandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated Jpuary 3, 1990. (Continued from January 9, 1990 meeting.) -9 Minutes 1-23-90 (b) thq staff's goals and incorporated many of the sugges- tio into the new goals list. (4) (Pg.4) Goals 17 ru 30 ne to be added to the list. (5) (last page) etty Martin oke, not Betty Ryan. Motion Mi stokke, second Creighton. So ordere1< noting the absence of Councilmember Sheldon. Recommendation approve Demands and Wa2iants Nos. 32049, 3223 through 32399 inclus' e, noting voided warrants 32244 thr gh 32246 inclusiv ; 32281 through 32283 inclusive; an 2309 through 311 inclusive. Action: To approve the errands and Warrants. Motion Midstokke, second ei• ton. So ordered, noting the absence of CouncilmembeSheldon. (c) Recommendation to recei - and f e Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to eceive and file De ember, 1989 City Treasurer's report. (e) Recommendatipn to receive and file Novembe 1989 Revenue ansa Expenditure report. Memorandum om Finance Director iki Copeland dated January 17, 1990. (f) Recommendation to receive and file December, 1989 onth- 1y/investment report. Memorandum from City Treasure 9ary L. Brutsch dated January 9, 1990. (g) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving draft Cir- culation, Transportation and Parking Element of the General Plan. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 16, 1990. Supplemental letters from Violet M. Isgreen, dated January 22, 1990, Jim Lis- sner, dated January 23, 1990 and David R. Suess, dated January 20, 1990. Addressing the Council were: Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street Proposed Action: To adopt Resolution No. 90-5339, which adopts the modifications, additions and deletions as noted within the Resolution to the. Circulation Transpor- tation Parking Element and include the recommended lan- guage as set forth in the City Manager's comments in the January 16, 1990 memo which are: "Local, residential streets include those streets predominately residential in terms of adjacent property use, that are intended to retain a residential character. Higher speeds and in- creasing traffic volumes are to be discouraged on such streets." (page 17-18) Motion Creighton, dies for lack of second. -- Minutes 1-23-90 ^,,I A.R 1. 9 r! 3fl Hermosa Beach City Council Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Good day, 1246 First St. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 March 16, 1990 This is in regard to an agenda item for a public hearing during the City Council meeting scheduled for March 27 on adopting the Circulation Element. It has been nearly eight weeks since I sent you a 32 -page letter on flaws in the proposed Circulation Element with respect to traffic on south Prospect. In that letter, which contained 22 pages of material copied directly from the proposed Element, I discussed several shortcomings, deficiencies, and inaccuracies. I have received no reply, no response, and no answer to my letter or to the question I have asked in writing twelve times since March of 1988 (two years ago): What is the City planning to do about mitigating traffic problems on Prospect Avenue south of Aviation? Or, to put it another way, what is the City doing to meet its obligations to ensure that the Circulation Element is being implemented for south Prospect, especially with respect to its collector status and its excessive traffic volume? I will probably not be able to attend on March 27, but I desire that you consider my January 20 letter and this letter as formal written communications from the public on the subject of adopting the circulation element. As I stated in that January letter, I apologize for the length of this letter, but I feel that the City has neglected its duty to oversee traffic circulation and accommodate the residents and businesses of Hermosa Beach. By allowing south Prospect, a collector street, to function as an arterial for the benefit of Redondo Beach and South Bay commuters and to the detriment of Hermosa residents and businesses, the City has neglected its duty on all sides. Given that updates to the Circulation Element are not timely (twenty years maximum) and that ten years have elapsed since the last update and the last attempt to address traffic on south Prospect, it is important to ensure that the draft element you approve is a complete, consistent document --- and, at least with respect to south Prospect, with the highest peak traffic volume in the City except for PCH, the document before you is not yet complete nor consistent. I appreciate your consideration of these issues and I await your reply and your answer. I hope either is forthcoming, this time; In closing I would urge that my comments from January 20 be reviewed, that the circulation element be amended before adoption to resolve the problems I have pointed out (as well as any other problems --- I only looked at south Prospect), and that the City take action to mitigate the traffic problems on south Prospect. As I stated in my last letter, I have every confidence that City staff are capable of providing solutions to this problem. Finally, I would like you to take a minute to re -read the "City Vision" that is printed on the cover of the City Council agenda, keeping in mind the commuter -shortcut nature of south Prospect in a low-density neighborhood. I hope you'll agree that the City Vision and the current conditions on south Prospect are inconsistent. Yours sincerely, David R. Suess cc: Kevin Northcraft, City Manager Michael Schubach, City Planner March 22, 1990 City of `.�%rmosarl3eacly Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Mr. David R. Suess 1246 First Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Subject: Response to your concerns regarding the Circulation, Transportation, and Parking Element. Dear Mr. Suess: In response to your concerns regarding the technical inaccuracies in the document, the City's Traffic Engineer has examined the technical aspects of the Circulation Element and has corrected these problems. Not all of the items you previously noted to be errors were determined to be errors. In regards to your concerns with the traffic on Prospect Avenue south of Aviation Boulevard, these issues were examined by both the Planning Commission and the City Council, and at this time no recommendations have been made to alter the existing situation as moving traffic would no doubt worsen the traffic on other streets. Your comments, as expressed in your January 20 letter, were considered along with a variety of comments and recommendations by the City Council prior to their final recommendations on the Circulation Element. Thank you for your input on these matters. Please be advised that these issues can potentially be considered 'again in the future. Your letter is part of the agenda packet for the March 27 meeting. Sincerely yours, a 1 ae Schu ach Planning Director cc: Kevin Northcraft, City Manager Michael Schubach, Planning Director Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Good day, 1246 First St. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 March 26, 1990 MAR 2 6 1990 f• N In regard to agenda item seven for a public hearing during the City Council meeting scheduled for March 27 on adopting the Circulation Element: I will not be able to attend, and I wish that these additional remarks be considered. Thank you for responding to my letter of March 16 about my January letter on flaws in the proposed Circulation Element with respect to traffic on south Prospect. I am gratified that the City's Traffic Engineer "has corrected these problems," but I am left in the dark by your statement that "Not all of the items you previously noted to be errors were determined to be errors." Which of the items do you mean? Does the Circulation Element being approved still maintain that rush hour traffic on Prospect south of Aviation is 93% local (as opposed to "through")? Is it not true that south Prospect is the second -busiest rush-hour street in town but receives little or no attention in the Circulation Element? Does not the Element show that the daily traffic volume on Prospect exceeds State guidelines and corresponds to that of a four -lane, asphalt arterial rather than a 25 -foot, concrete collector? It is important that the City Council have accurate information on which to base their decisions. Given that errors existed for six months and went uncorrected until after my letter, what assurance is there that the document being approved does not contain still other errors, undetected or uncorrected? Finally, thank you for answering my two -years -old question on what the City intended to do to mitigate traffic problems on south Prospect.. I am disappointed to learn that the City still intends to do nothing, but I am appalled at the reason given: "no recommendations have been made to alter the existing situation as moving traffic would no doubt worsen the traffic on other streets." Does this mean that the City will allow the guideline -violating traffic situation on south Prospect to persist so that commuter drivers traveling from Redondo arterials to other Redondo arterials will not be inconvenienced by having to go either to the PCH business corridor for ten blocks or to Redondo side streets? I hope that the Council will have available for careful review the revisions and corrections made before approving the Circulation Element. Yours sincerely, Ale David R. Suess cc: Kevin Northcraft, City Manager Hermosa Beach City Council SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1 March 27, 1990 City of21ermosarl3eaclt. Mr. David R. Suess 1246 First Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mr. Suess: Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Please accept the following clarification of the previous letter. The traffic engineer had examined the document priorto it being submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council -- not after you submitted your letter -- and the document was substantially corrected. If the errors you mentioned were in fact errors they were corrected. In other words, the City traffic engineer was satisfied with the information .contained in the document when it went to the Planning Commission and City Council, and any additional changes were noted. Also, as I noted previously your letters were presented to the City Council for their review. Michael Schubach Planning Director MAS/yyt SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION aG oel p%. " '`, e4--aZ-' March 5th, 1990 ak/ Honorable M. yor and M"e"mbe'rs `"'tlity Council Meeting of the City Council March 13th, 1990 GENERAL SERVICES PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM Recommendation: It is recommended that Council approve the expenditure of the appropriated funds to initiate the first phase of the Public Information Program for the General Services Department. The initial cost will be $8,770 dollars which includes: ads; posters; a twenty page booklet on Parking Enforcement ($6,000), Training ($200.00); and a Uniform Change ($2,570.00). Phase I also includes some policy and procedure changes. Background: At their regularly scheduled meeting of October 24th, 1989 Council approved in concept the Public Information Program. Council at that time requested staff to indicate how the appropriations requested were to be spent. Analysis: The first phase of the program targets parking enforcement, and includes implementation of some policy and procedure changes, designed to improve the image of the Department and its personnel. These changes include a much broader use of discretion by the officers in dismissing their own citations; encouraged citizen feedback; officer training; and a change in uniform, to reshape the perception of the officer from that of being merely an enforcer. Phase I of the public information program "Parking Enforcement" will consist of; 1) Ads in the local newspapers and the city newsletter; 2) Posters to be place in public places, including the City Hall complexes; and, 3) An information booklet to be distributed to citizens of the community. The booklets will also be located in public places and accessed as needed. 4) In-house training (Citizen as Customer); 5) New Policies and Procedures, and increased Officer accountability. 1 Advertisement has been very successful in several cities, and the attached copies of promotions are examples of situations that could be the subject matter for our posters. These ads were put together by high-priced advertising firms, and it would not be advisable to plagiarize them. The sample ads will be distributed to the General Services personnel as part of a contest to enter ideas for an ad campaign. A competition will be held, and employee recognition given for the ideas chosen. The attached booklet "A Guide: The Do's and Don'ts of parking in Hermosa Beach", will be updated and new information added. Cost break down included. APPROACH/TIMETABLE: To commence as soon as training is completed, and the posters and revised booklets are received. Respectfully subm'tted: Heniy L. St ten Acting General Services Director CONCUR: evin B. Northdraft City Manager Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Improving the Image Phase I A. Discretion: New Policies and procedures. 1. Officers are perms'ttedAto. dismiss their own citations in the field under the following circumstances: a. When the citizen is on the scene and in the Officer's opinion it would best serve public relations if he/she dismissed the citation (Citation is dismissed and a note written on the back indicating "in the best interest of P.R.") b. In situations, where a driver has gone into a store to get change, is prepared to feed the meter and does so. c. When it is not obvious that the vehicle is inoperable, and it is brought to the Officers' attention, i.e., flat tire, dead battery, etc. (those citations are to be dismissed, with the explanation "in the best interest of P.R." written on rear of the citation). d. In a/\i veh 1 cor; ec \ e� b1- ckithe �terest of .R.). wher he op obem - 1. ewe mak/ e. In any other circumstance where, in the officer's judgement, the best interest of justice will be served and or the problem will be resolved by the dismissal of a citation. i.e., differences in watch/clock time; (note: in the interest of good P.R.) The current Standard Operating Policies and Procedures, will be reviewed and revised, based on feedback from staff; the Officers; the citizenry; and the City Council, in an effort to eliminate unfair or iniquitous enforcement. B. Citizen Feedback: a. Supervisors will create form to be used to encourage and aid Citizen comments and participation. b. Citizen comments and or complaints will be evaluated and if appropriate, used to determine if there is a need to adjust the department's policies and/or procedures. UNIFORM CHANGE 1. Staff recommends that there be a change in the color of the uniform. Uniform change to commence after the appropriate training is complete. The goal of the change in uniform: a. To change the perception of the officer as an enforcer. b. To get the officer to change his perception of what he has to do to get his job done. c. To help the Officer feel better about the job he/she has to perform. 2. The cost of the change in uniform is: $2,570.00 3. Cost breakdown included in an attached report from the personnel department. The uniform that is being proposed is a uniform that is used in many surrounding communities. Staff recommends a change from Tan shirt and Dark Brown trousers to a Light Blue Shirt and Dark/Navy blue Trousers, with a Dark Blue /Navy Jacket. Staff also recommends that the sleeve patches be changed to reflect the right color coordination. A change in the title of the position to Community Services Officer is beir►g considered, and if implemented, should be indicated on the patches. Cost savings, if any, from this change in uniform, cannot be determined at this time. One plan under consideration, is to keep the existing shirt, and change the pants. This would reduce the cost by approximately $580.00. 5 PARKING ENFORCEMENT POLICIES Responsibility: 1. To enforce California Vehicle and Hermosa Beach Municipal Codes, as they pertain to parking violations. 2. To enforce all codes equitably, consistently, and without prejudice or favoritism. 3. To enforce all "clearly defined violations" observed. 4. To completely cover your assigned area in a consistent manner, and not concentrate your effort only in areas where there are more violations. 5. To be courteous, civil and respectful to all persons. Avoid answeringquestions in a short, abrupt manner. Try to maintain a cheerful attitude, regardless of the provo- cation. Remain cool and collected at all times. Refrain from•harsh, violent, coarse, profane, sarcastic or insolent language. (R3.10 - G. S. Rules and Regs) 6,, -.Be attentive to reports and complaints by citizens and either give them personal attention or refer them to the. proper person or agency. (R4.02 - G.S. Rules and Regs) CURRENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES (subject to revision) 7 General Guidelines: 1. "When in doubt, don't" - If you are unsure of the type of violation or if there is a question in your mind, as to whether or not a vehicle should be cited, don't issue a citation. It should be evident that there is a clear-cut violation, before a citation is issued. 2. Sidewalk violations - The City Council has directed that " where there is a clearly defined sidewalk and a vehicle is parked so as to not allow 3' for pedestrian access, that vehicle should be cited ". 3. Alleys - All vehicles are to be parked within the red lines, adjacent to the private property. 4. When marking .vehicles for seventy-two hours, the chalk marks must be on the tread and not on the sidewall of the tire. 5. Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Section 19-92 states " No person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle for•any purpose other than the loading or unloading of persons or material in any alley fifteen feet or less in width." To maintain conformity, our rule of thumb is to allow fifteen minutes for the purpose of loading or. unloading, ie. groceries, tools, etc. This is usually indicated, by the owner of the vehicle, when they activate their vehicle emergency flashers, to alert the enforcement officer that they are loading or unloading. However, this is not a requirement. Technically, unless the vehicle owner is present, there is no way of knowing that the vehicle is parked for this purpose. In the interest of justice, the enforcement officer is to chalk any vehicle that is parked in the alley and return in fifteen minutes to see if the vehicle has been moved. If not, the vehicle is to be cited. Referrals/Backup: 1. Officers shall make every attempt to resolve problems in the field. However, when it becomes necessary, contact the supervisor on duty or the senior officer, if the supervisor is not available. 2. If a situation becomes hostile, you should: a. Call your supervisor and/or radio for a police backup b. If neither are available, leave the scene. 3. Requests for citation dismissals should be referred to the'. Administrative Hearing Officer. At no time, should dismissals be referred to City Hall, the Director of the Department or other staff personnel. Exception: See section re. Discretion. 4. Citizens who wish to file a complaint regarding an officer should be advised to send a formal letter of complaint to the General Services Director. • 5. Citizens who wish to file a complaint regarding department policy should be advised to send a formal letter of complaint to the General Services Director. 6. Citizens who wish to complain regarding meter problems should be referred to Base #3, so that a meter repair work order may be filled out. 7. -Citizens who wish to complain regarding street signs,' curb markings, etc., should be referred to the Public Works Department. 8. Citizens who wish to complain regarding City Ordinances should be directed to send.a formal letter of complaint to the attention of the City. Manager. -'i - February 15, 1990 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager Robert A. Blackwood, Personnel Director General Service Officers' Uniforms The cost of changing the color of the current G.S. Officers' uni- forms would be $2,570.00. this assumes a complete change which includes: 3 uniform shirts (one long sleeve; two short sleeve); two pair pants; one jacket; and new patches. The total number of officers to be outfitted is 9 (seven of- ficers; 3 supervisors). Supervisor Lee has indicated to me that one plan that has been considered is to keep the existing shirt and change the pants, jacket and patches. If this were done the cost would be reduced to. $1,988.80. His proposal changes the color of the pants and jacket to an olive drab. While this would not "soften" the image of the of- ficers to the public, in Melvin's opinion this change would im- pact on the self-image of the officer and, hopefully, increase his professionalism. cc: L. Staten TO: MEMO FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT Robert Blackwood, Personnel Director FROM: Peggy Dunn, Municipal Intern✓ DATE: February 15, 1990 SUBJECT: General Services Uniform Pricing ***************************************************************** The pricing to completely outfit 9 officers and 3 supervisors is as follows: PATCHES quantity of 165 = $2.22-$2.45 = approx. $366.30-$404.25 quantity of 335 = $1.64-$1.88 = approx. $549.40-$629.80 SHIRTS long sleeved - $17.50 each x 12 = $210.00 short sleeved - $15.50 each x 24 (2 each) = $372.00 PANTS class B - $15.00 each x 24 (2 each) = $360.00 JACKETS $89.95 x 12 = $1,079.40 TOTAL $2,021.40 (to completely outfit 12) (8a,570 roc NE,.; Fi eke; 1 BACKcRavNn MATER/AL October 2, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council October 24, 1989 PROPOSAL FOR GENERAL SERVICES PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council (1) approve the proposal for the General Services Public Information Program, Phases I and II, for fiscal year 1989/90, (2) appropriate $6,000 from the Parking Fund to the P.E. Contract Services Account and $4,000 from the Crossing Guard Fund to the C.G. Contract Services Account to finance these projects and (3) direct staff to budget Phases III and IV in the 1990/91 Fiscal Year Budget. Background: As part of Department Head Goals and Objectives, for fiscal year 1989/90, City Manager Northcraft requested that Director Noon present new ideas for public relations efforts for the General Services Department. Subsequently, in a memo dated August 22, 1989, the General Services Director submitted the following; Animal Control: This is an area that is easy to get into. So much can be done to improve public relations in animal control. Unfortunately, over the years, it has taken a back seat due to the demands for parking enforcement and the ensuing revenue connected with same. Our efforts in this area were comprised of instructional presentations in the schools and an annual pet show. While both were successful, interest in these programs waned. In retrospect, I attribute this to lack of money and personnel. It was not a case of a concerted, budgeted effort but rather "fit it into your schedule with existing funds". At some point in time, other priorities prevailed. We were privileged to participate in a Los Angeles County Animal Control study, entitled Improving Animal Control, a few years ago. Several excellent ideas were generated as a result of this study and active participation by cities, humane organizations, vendors, etc. Endorsed recommendations include; - Radio and TV — Public Service Announcements could be used to inform and educate. (Since we are closely connected with the local cable network it could probably be arranged easily). - Quarterly Newsletter or Magazine. (With the advent of desk -top publishing, this is a realistic approach). 1 lk - Education in Schools - We have already had some experience in this area. We currently have two films available albeit they may be somewhat outdated. However, there are many more out there if we are willing to invest the money. - Positive Image Campaign - Animal Control Officers as "good guys"; a) Rename Animal Control to Animal Rescue - Print on all vehicles, forms, applications, licenses, etc. b) Produce video tapes that portray the Animal Control Officer as a helper and rescuer, i.e. an officer stopping traffic to help an injured animal, placing the animal on a stretcher and taking to vet, sub- sequently calling the owner to let them know what has happened. c) A program in which animal control officers give "RPO" (responsible pet owner) buttons to pet owners walking their dogs on leashes, carrying pooper scoopers, etc. - Mall/Fiesta Exhibits; Booths could be set up to hand out information, brochures, rules and regulations, etc. A plus could be to distribute pet food, flea collars, leashes,etc. (donated by vendors). - Annual Pet Shows; This has proven to be a big hit with the community, both owners (mostly children) and their parents. In the past, no one was a loser because we had a prize for every imaginable category. Cable TV: Public relations in this area has to be a cooperative effort between the city and the cable company. I think we have made some strides to date via the community survey, Cable TV Board, etc. Information dissemination will become more efficient through our direct communication to the character generator. This will enable the City to release immediate information dealing with a variety of subjects from the urgent to the mundane, as well as displaying the agendas for both City Council and Planning Commission meetings. Through cooperation, question and answer programs, documentaries, etc. could benefit the community considerably. Crossing Guards: This is an area that we never considered in promoting public relations, but it is an important one. While we have responded to concerns and complaints, of both parents and the school district, we have never conducted a pro -active campaign. It would be very beneficial to meet with the PTO, both prior to and during the school year, to determine if the City is meeting their needs and to solicit input on how to improve service. There is a need for education in this area. We have found that many times the children (and sometimes their parents) do not - 2 - follow the safe route to school, thereby placing themselves in potential danger. In addition to giving a presentation, in the schools and at PTO meetings, a coloring book could be designed to encourage the safe route to school. Parking Enforcement: This is a tough one! Parking Enforcement is one of those areas where "you're damned if you do and damned if you don't". One of the efforts to date has been to publish a brochure, A guide: The Do's and Don'ts of Parking in Hermosa Beach. Also, the Hearing Officer Program has been an added plus to public relations. We had a video produced promoting parking permits, which we aired on cable TV. Finally, a poster, warning against blocking the sidewalk (when this was a big issue), was distributed throughout town as well as used in a half page ad in the Easy Reader. Advertisement has been very successful in several cities. We have attached copies of promotions that have been used. Since these ad campaigns were put together by high priced advertising firms, it would not be advisable to plagiarize them. It could be a boost to morale if the employees, of the General Services Department, were solicited to enter ideas for an ad campaign, based on the same principles. A competition could be held with awards and employee recognition given for those ideas chosen. This could then be extended to include other ideas that could promote public relations in the field of parking enforcement. ***************************************************************** It must be realized that any attempt, to increase public relations efforts, will require a commitment on the part of the City Council and the Administration to dedicate funds and personnel to accomplish the task. ***************************************************************** Upon receipt of the above recommendations, City Manager Northcraft directed that an agenda item be prepared for the City Council to include a timetable and funding. He further stated that his emphasis is first on parking enforcement and safe route to school, with the others to follow. Analysis: Staff recognizes that, while ideas may come easily, actual implementation is more time consuming and costly. Therefore, we are proposing a four phase plan as follows; Phase I - Parking Enforcement Ad Campaign - Implement 89/90 - Commence Immediately - Approximate Cost/$6,000 (includes newspaper ads). Approach/Timetable: 3 1. Distribute sample ads to General Services personnel, asking for ideas to be submitted by December 1st., to include photo (black & white) and caption. 2. Establish panel of judges, prior to December 1st. Should include persons (possibly solicited from the community or newspaper) with graphics background. 3. Choose winners and present awards by first City Council meeting in January. 4. Go to bid for graphics firm to perform set-up for ads and posters, first week in January. 5. Award bid, second City Council meeting in February. 6. Commence campaign April 1, 1990. Depending upon the number of entries chosen, city could promote on a monthly, quarterly or bi-annual basis. Promotion to include ads in local newspapers as well as posters to be distributed throughout city buildings, public library, post office, markets, etc. Phase II - Safe Route to School Campaign - Implement 89/90 - Commence Immediately - Approximate Cost/$4,000 Approach/Timetable: 1. General Services Coordinator and/or Supervisors schedule a meeting with PTO second week in November of 1989 to get parent and teacher reaction and input on the new program as well as address any concerns they may have. 2. Prepare a request for proposal for the design and printing of a coloring book depicting the benefits of following a safe route to school and the dangers involved in disregarding said route, the first week in February. 3. Award of bid, first City Council meeting in May. 4. Make arrangements with School District (may wish to include private schools in city as well) to make presentation to school children during the month of October 90. At this time the coloring books could be distributed. It would be better to commence this effort at the beginning of the school year.' 5. General Services Coordinator and/or Supervisors will schedule a follow-up meeting with the PTO sometime in November of 1990.. Phase III - Cable TV gffort - Implement 1990 - Approximate Cost/ Effort has already commenced on this program. We have made arrangements with MultiVisions tohave direct access to the character generator and the necessary equipment has been ordered. Further planning in this area should be left up to whomever is assigned the responsibility for Cable TV. Phase IV - Animal Control Campaign - Implement 1990/91 - Approximate Cost/ This is a very ambitious campaign and will require more dedication of personnel. It is advisable to hold this program in abeyance until the General Services Department reorganization has been completed and the dust has settled. The proposed budget for Phases I and II are ball -park figures based upon estimate provided by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The timetable estimates are based upon personal experience in preparing projects for the City of Hermosa Beach. (:--- J9,4 :---Jo n Noon General Services Director Concur: evin B. ort craft City Manager Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director CITY MANAGER COMMENT: Since this program does not directly relate to our current goals, an option would be to defer until our goal review in December, 1989. However, the proposals seem very responsive to Council and citizen complaints. By starting with these proposals now, we can initiate what we hope will become a citywide "Citizen as Customer" theme. Such a theme would be designed to improve the quality of contacts with citizens, and the citizens' view of their City. t RESERVED METERED PARKING iII 411oCe.•..1:4(Ar •qern • • •• 14;-.47.-izzi'.1,4-q-•, So. talA414-1374 ,enzzak.:#4if: • ,z;taggararat.aall,,t., . • . ••••- 'r• • •:•• ,x414,"6 ..........sanassrsumussugsanzmuzincmunWIM154-• .:".wor,,_.„,tin..,,,s,:iv,t, .:::-4:;_icH4,447,-.!**.00.,,,,.." ,,miszsizzaasrm.‘. .,-itz•re},•c..,•4,.--....--...pt,d)44'..4, ...... - -..,......et=tpf-mts.- ,.:.1.:••• n.,:,:• • % A ,„,,,.,,,,,.... ,,,,,.,„ - .„ ., reiler-a.V,-&ilA 4 ,.." . . ,,,,.,,s,,t, ,ts: --n. -4,e---47.4.4Ni*,4 .."c,..,: --11*-•'''''''.;t:-%•?' r's ,.....40-'..:•14.-iit., .1.., „wor ....-..kioo,.,..... .. ---,.1.„. 4.* ..c„.„-6*?q,..?.4..* '...,,,•?2,--4,4`, . „. - ..,,. * . •*14-4.1... , vog,t_ ... ol,...4.05.4*4 . .„,... 7'A... il„_..,.. .-jil'w6l'a';:".1".61.kuma"w2lyr24,,;141.,,,,.::,.ffc.."."--.4'.:7:...;‘'''t"c:7-41'1"-.74: . . _ • .......,....m,0V=:;Arrrs...,. , 4 1.Air-,r.:04 ' 4%4'4 ....r: -,: •.:1- -4: ,-,:s 40 :....,-,-.1-;;..(1,-.4,.-A.,K,., 4 y • ..'t V1,7! , ,64...,4,1-,gt.;,; - x---,,i-Nlc-,;..,-?,,,..4.0.. 4, It 7'{ ... ,:„,;,,,K.--;.J:ir,z,W.••:,t,-ATIA;741,7, .:4;i:..,$;4!?.11..,-60-', %.4...... - . ,c,.,,.. . „,..r N taking life tough for a few selfish driers can make life a lot easier for the rest of us. Ws a thankless job But parking personnel help stop ' the violators who park where they shouldn't. • or who exceed (heir time limit so you cant park at all. Enforcement also helps traffic flow smoothly. and keeps streets open so emer- ...: • cencv vehicles aren't brought to a dead stop. - -', ';-';,:.',.',?,)i,;:.:.:-'..• :.::: ' •::;:;:.;.2,' Were cracking down ori lawbreakers :u open - :•,., • , ... up si)ace tor us al ,,.. •- • ...,,:t ..,.„ . • : .:, . . : , .,!;= : '-•• : `h., , - ',:-• - ''''''''': ILLEGAL PARKING %Vit.;.-\ t:ti';t�E'.aq x A parking violator Commits a Careiess act. An ambulance is delayed. A life is lost. There's oni� one wa% to prevent it. Enforce the ia‘v. That's • what our parking management program is doing. It's making sure the actions of a selfish kw aren't allowed to jeopardize he safety of us all. So we're writing tickets and to‘‘ ing cars ‘1,e're Making life tough for Lawbreakers. be- cause the rest of us can't afford to be brought 0 a dead stop. ILLEGAL PARKING CSS EVERYONE. . A IIleSS. $.. trcn t tl:c Cn, .. c (1,t1 ui I'arkir pn7�„xt Erin' ` ♦i(NWI�N• B � ~i datoz j;n t it rel �� ',•�z: At. IN DRIVEWAY They're ever\ here Blocking your drryekvav Obstructing irafl!c. Making life difficult. ThL•i r . nore the parking regulations most people obey'. But ;Vere doing something about it Our parking management program is enforcing .the law. Making pure parking violators get What they deserve. That's bad news Inr then ;. .But it's 7rczat news for the rest of us. because .:'-'.there's no roan; in our city for space invaders. ILLEGAL PARKING COSTS EVERYONE. DID YOU KNOW THIS IS WRONG' Although we are aware of the parking problems in Hermosa Beach, Pedestrians have rights too! The City asks that you do not block the sidewalks. This is a violation of California Vehicle Code 22500F. City of Hermosa Beach vooODo� bo ER 3.29-84 HB314A City of 21ermosaTeack 4 0. • i v i Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 September 26, 1989 Mr. Al Fuentes Member Services S.C.A.G. 818 West 7th Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Dear Mr. Fuentes, Thank you for your prompt response to our request for a cost estimate to produce public information materials. This matter is scheduled to be before the City Council at their meeting of October 24, 1989. I will not be able to see this project through since I will be retiring at the end of October. However, I am turning the project over to my Administrative Aide, Michele Tercero. She will be contacting you regarding the City Council's decision in this matter and what, if any, action is to be undertaken. If you have any questions, you may reach her at (213) 318-0257. I have been requested by our Public Works Director, Anthony Antich, to inquire if you have a brochure which outlines the services offered by your group. He was very impressed with the assistance you have provided to our department. If such is available, please forward to either Mr. Antich or myself. Once again, thank you for all your help. It has been a pleasure working with your organization. Sincerely, General Services Director cc: Anthony Antich, Public Works Director/ Michele Tercero, Administrative Aide City o f2-lermosarl3each. September 5, 1989 Mr. Al Fuentes Member Services S.C.A.G. 818 West 7th Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Dear Mr. Fuentes, Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 The City of Hermosa Beach is once again seeking your assistance in public relations efforts. If you recall, a couple of years ago, your organization designed, edited and printed a brochure entitled The DOs and DON'Ts of Parking in Hermosa Beach, as a contract service. At this point, we are in the planning stages and need a cost estimate for two projects we are considering. The first project under consideration is an ad and poster campaign depicting the benefit of parking enforcement. I have attached copies of material used by the City of New Orleans, LA. To help bolster morale, among our civilian personnel enforcing parking regulations, we are suggesting that a competition be held whereby the officers would submit black and white photographs along with appropriate captions. ,Those ideas chosen would be used in the campaign and service awards would be given to the employees submitting the ideas. We would need a cost estimate for camera ready set up; editing; printing of approximately one hundred posters for each idea chosen; and suggested ad size and cost. For planning purposes, let us assume we would use four (one each quarter) different subjects. The second project is a coloring book depicting the benefit of following the "safe route to school" and the potential danger of not doing so. This project would be from scratch, we don't have any idea on how to proceed. We have a small school district, approximately seven hundred students K through 8th grade. We would need ball. park costs from design to printing. - 1 - We are scheduled to present these proposals to the City Council at their second meeting in October Herefore, we would like to get approximate cost as soon as possible. We would need separate costs for each project with as much breakdown as possible. We greatly appreciate any help you can give us in this matter. If you have any question or need further information, please contact my office (213) 318-0257. Sincerely, an Noon General Services Director IOUTHERA CALIFORAIA AIIOCIATIOA OF GOVERAAIEATI 818 West Seventh Street, 12th Floor 3 Los Angeles, California 90017 7,1 (213) 236-1800 FAX (213) 236-1825 September 19, 1989 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE President Mike Antonovich, Supervisor. Los Angeles County First Vice President Christine Reed, Councilmember, Santa Monica Second Vice President John Flynn, Supervisor Ventura County Past President Don Griffin, Councilmember, Buena Park Imperial County Abe Seabolt, Supervisor Los Angeles County Deane Dana, Supervisor Orange County Harriett Wieder, Supervisor Riverside County Kay Ceniceros, Supervisor San Bernardino County Jon Mike's, Supervisor Cities of Imperial County (Ta be filled) City of Los Angeles Tom Bradley, Mayor Us Angeles Gloria Molina, Councilmernber, Los Angeles Robert Farrell, Councilmernber, Los Angeles City of Long Beach Clarence Smith, Councilmember. Long Beach Cities of Riverside County Jack Clarke, Councibnember, Riverside Cities of San Bernardino County John I.ongville, Mayor Rialto Cities of Ventura County John Melton, Councibnember, Santa Paula Cities of Orange County Irwin Fried, Coucilntentb r, Yorba Linda AT -LARGE DELEGATES Jacki Bacharach, Mayor, Rancho Palos Verdes Robert Gentry. Mayor, Laguna Beach Judy Nieburger, Couru'ilmember, Moreno Valley ALTERNATES Ms. Joan Noon General Services Director City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center -1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Dear Ms. Noon: It was indeed a pleasure to hear from you again. It demonstrated to us at SCAG that our Member Fee Services Program is of value to our member cities. In response to your request for a cost estimate to produce some parking enforcement materials, the following is provided: a) AD: 11 1/2" x 14" Artwork and Production $750. Typesetting 175. total 950. b) POSTERS (3): 12" X 18"; 100 lb. glossy book paper stock; (2) colors -black & 1 PMS color; 100 copies Artwork and Production $1,425. Typesetting 300. Printing (100 copies each) 1,050. total $2,775. c) BOOKLET: 5 1/2" x 8 1/2" 10 sheets of 8 1/2" x 11" folded = 20 pages plus the cover; 1 color Artwork and Production $1,825. Typesetting 300. Printing (300 copies) 850. total 2,975• If you want SCAG to proceed with this service, please provide us with a production schedule as soon as possible. Thank you again with the opportunity to provide a service to the City of Hermosa Beach. Al Fuentes Member Services Imperial County o Jeanie Vogel, Supervisor • Los Angeles County o Edmund Edelman, Supervisor and Peter Schabarum, Supervisor • Orange County o Gaddi Vasquez. Supervisor • Riverside County o Melba Dunlap, Supervisor • San Bernardino County o Larry Walker, Supervisor • Ventura County o James Dougherty, Supervisor • Cities of Imperial County o Ron Rodriguez, Councibnernber, Westmoreland • Cities of Los Angeles County o Vacant • Cities of Riverside County • Richard Deininger, Jr., Mayor, Corona • Cities of Orange County o John Karlal. Mayor Pro Tem, Cypress • Cities of San Bernardino County o Larry Rhinhart, Mayor Montclair • Cities of Ventura County o Frank McDevitt, Councilmember, Ojai o Richard Alatorre, Councilmember, Los Angeles • Michael Woo, Councilmember- Los Angeles • Joy Picus, Councilmember, Los Angeles • Long Beach 2nd Position Vacant • Vicki Howard, Councibnernber, Simi Valley • Robert Bartlett, Mayor, Monrovia • Ruthelyn Plummer, Mayor Pro Tem, Newport Beach • c. If needed, a Task Force can be organized to deal with certain specific problems and make recommendations (Task Force to consist of Supervisor(s), Officer(s), member(s) from Business Community, Resident(s) Note: Please remember, that is it far better to have a vehicle move from a problem area, than to have it sit there all day with a citation on it's window. However, these policies are not intended to allow constant violators and or those who would wait for the officers to appear before obeying the law, to go without citation(s). Cost and recommendations for implementation of the Public Information Program: TRAINING 1. Staff recommends that the Public Information Program start with training our General Services Officers. Training to commence when appropriate materials are received. The goal of the training program: a. To make the Officer knowledgeable of the objectives (The Citizen as Customer/the new policies and procedures). b. To explain the individual officers' responsibility for the success of the program. c. To give specific instructions to the officers in so far as our expectations of him/her (making sure that our Officers know that they will be held accountable for their actions). That they will also be rewarded for sustained high quality performance 2. The initial cost of training will be approximately $200.00. Statistics shall be maintained to evaluated the effectiveness of the program. 4 Honorable Maybr and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council ENTRY SIGNS February 27, 1990 Regular Meeting of March 13, 1990 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council receive and file this report. Background: November 2, 1989, City Council approved the design for entry signs and directed staff to prepare a bid package. The November 1, 1989 staff report is attached. At mid -year, Council asked for a second look at entry signs. Analysis: 1. Budget 2. Locations 3. Sign Design 1. Budget CIP 89-612, City Entry. Signs has an approved funding level of $ 16,000. 2. Locations All of the locations under consideration at the moment are: 1. Prospect at 1st Place * 2. Manhattan Ave. at 35th 3. Ardmore at Longfellow 4. Aviation at PCH * 5. Both ends of the Strand Wall 6. Hermosa Ave. at Herondo * 7. Valley Drive at Longfellow * 8. PCH at Gould 9. PCH at 1st St. * F - 1 - 3. Sign Design SUMMARY While surveying the City it is very apparent there is no semblance of uniform signs within the City. The various City signs are in different colors, different style print and different sizes. Respectively Submitted, Anthony Antich Director of Publlic Works Mary .• o f'ey, Acting Director of Community Resources Concur: evin B. Northcraft City Manager Attachments: Background Material (SEE CITY MANAGER NOTE ATTACHED) CITY MANAGER COMMENT: Entry signs are a very obvious and important statement of a City's image of itself. The approved signs will eliminate the hodge podge and broken signage that currently exists on our streets, and further Goals 1.1 (enhance awareness), 7 (upgrade downtown), and 10 (enhance sense of community). November 2, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members RECEIVED �C `'C JAN 17 1990 321- 13i"1�m� PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. City Council Meeting of of the City Council November 14, 1989 APPROVAL OF DESIGN OF ENTRY SIGNS TO THE CITY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission the City Council approve the attached design for entry signs to the City and direct staff to prepare a bid package. BACKGROUND The Commission has been working on this project for several months. During this time period they have reviewed many designs and color schemes and reviewed the various locations via slides and photographs. ANALYSIS CIP 89-612, City Entry Signs has an approved funding level of $16,700. The slide presentation that will be presented at the Council Meeting will show all the locations considered by the Commission as sites for the new signs. Upon receiving responses from the various bidders, and subject to budget appropriations, the Commission would then recommend to the Council the best locations for the installations of the signs. All of the locations under consideration at the moment are: Prospect at 1st. Place * Manhattan Ave. at 35th. Ardmore at Longfellow Aviation at PCH* Both ends of the Strand Wall Hermosa Ave. at Herondo* Valley Drive 'at Longfellow* PCH at Gould PCH at 1st. St.* *Denotes entry sign already there. DESIGN The sign shall be either a monument sign to be installed in the ground or a metal sign to be attached to a pole. The monument sign shall be constructed of concrete, poured in a form that is set level and flat. Copy for the name of the city will be cut out of gator foam, and set on face of form and poured over, so the name will be inset in the concrete. The logo will be in concrete also and the lettering will be a more modified script and not as depicted on the attached color rendering. The size of the monument sign shall be 4' x 7' x 8" thick. 1 Fri The pole signs shall be a treated metal ( to withstand the salt air) and shall be the same design and color as the monument sign. The size shall be 18" x 3' x 6". The existing monument signs shall be retained. The bricks will be treated and painted according to the new color scheme and the actual face of the sign shall be redone to match the new design. While surveying the City it is very apparent there is no semblance of uniform signage within the City. The various City signs are in different colors, different style print and different sizes. Part of the slide presentation will show some of the various signs throughout the City. Kevin • B. Northcyaft City Manager Respectfully submitted, Alana Mastrian-Handman Director Dept. of Community Resources • • •• • • . ••.;',4;r . •f• ' -1 , ‘, T‘:".1e6' • 4 .••*: • • ^7 7:4•7rfr '''/'-''' r-15.•-•...., 4$.•:'• .-r .. - MI — .... ',.. ••••,, .4,4. ' 11116.: S'cg • • . • . • • . • . • • ; ••• '... Ii •• 111 4.• ,] .1 ,, • „ . ri WA 1.• 1 Iii. . . ., '111 , . 1.11t., X :;• . •I• : Fil • , ,,,,, . ' . 1 , • • • • 1 f.,,i - ) ' 4k. ' .'• , •11;'. . ,1 , ' 44 NEON" SIGN COMPANY, IZ'TC. 707 E. ROSECHANS AVE. • LOS ANGELES, CA 90059 • (213) 3271317 • 1213) 321-4900 • STATE LICENSE NO. 253027 AUGUST 17, 1959 ALANA MASTRIAN-HANDMAN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 RE: ENTRY SIGNS Dear Al.ana , The proposed sign will. be constructed of concrete, poured in a form that is set level and flat. All supports will be in fora, such as re bar and the. installation piper., tied and welded in place befor the form is poured, CopY for• the narne of the city will be cut out of gator foam, and set on face of form and poured over, so the name will be inset in the concrete. The logo will be made of plastic, so as to look more like a windmill. The monument at this time can be painted or textured to the desired finish. Tile will he used on the areas shown: on the drawing - All signs are to be engineered for depth of footing by a civil engineer. Thanks, If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely Rocky Gruner Sales Dirtector Chief Neon Sign Co, Inc. TO: Commissioners CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH' -INTER- OFFICE MEMO DATE: August 24, 1989 RE: Entry Signs Specifications FROM: Alana Mastrian-Han ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** The attached letter contains the specifications for the entry signs to the City. At the last Commission meeting the Commission agreed on the design of the signs and requested the sign company to return with specifications. Additionally, the Commission on March 22, 1989 approved the following locations for the installation of the signs. The locations are listed on a priority basis per the Commission. PCH & First St. (entering from Redondo) Greenwood at PCH Ardmore (entering from Manhattan) PCH (entering from Manhattan) pw Prospect (entering from Manhattan) Gould/Artesia (entering from Manhattan)— p T Both ends of the Strand A map will be displayed the evening of the meeting identifying the locations listed above. /6/0 _f p las- ; o� :'� s .2 . ' �P t1 �L4 To CoC q a. Tv 0w -� �/�G`" (j) (k) (1) (m) (n) (0) (p) Recommendation to deny the following claims for damages and refer to the City's Claims Administrator: 1) Sunstone Music, c/o Law Offices of Peter R. Dionato, 8421 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 205, Beverly Hills, CA 90201, filed October 17, 1989; alleged unlaw- ful breach of contract. 2) Dama Claire Strizam, 408 Ocean View #B, Hermosa Beach, filed October 17, 1989; alleged auto acci- dent resulting from alleged negligent maintenance of tree. 3) Hans Joachim Schreier, 853 So. Bedford St., #4, Los Angeles 90035, filed October 2, 1989; alleged auto damage from fire hydrant. Recommendation to receive and file response to com- plaints by Michael Pitton regarding Vasek Polak auto dealerships. Memorandum from Building and Safety Direc- tor William Grove dated November 2, 1989. Action: To continue to the first meeting in January. Motion Rosenberger, second Williams. So ordered. Recommendation to adopt proposed resolution establishing the conditional use permit procedure for review and approval of requests for exceptions, pursuant to Sec- tions 13-3(A), 13-7(B), and 13-7(C) of the Zoning Ordinance, from certain provisions regarding the re- modeling and expansion of nonconforming structures. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November 2, 1989. (CONTINUED FROM 10/24/89 MEETING.) Action: ,To adopt Resolution No. 89-5326. Motion Sheldon, second Simpson. So ordered. Recommendation to approve design for entry signs to the City and direct staff to prepare a bid package. Memo- randum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian- Handman dated November 2, 1989. Recommendation to approve requests from Chamber of Commerce and staff regarding holiday activities. Memo- randum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated November 6, 1989. Recommendation to transfer $15,100 and authorize pur- chase of 220 parking meters from Duncan Industries to replace existing meters. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated November 6, 1989. Recommendation to receive and file review of past parking structure proposals. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated November 7, 1989. 4 Minutes 11-14-89 PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 27, 1989, MEETING JAN .1 1990 EUBJJO-WORKS DEPT„ ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Crecy, Commissioners Blaco, Reviczky, Pierce Staff: Belser, Edison, Rooney Absent: Merle Fish Visitors: Rick Kozlowski/LA Times Bike Ride MINUTES Motion: "To approve as submitted." Reviczky/Crecy All Ayes SPECIAL EVENT POLICY Motion: To approve staff recommendation with a stipulation that the ordinance have an added clause allowing for changes in fees as determined necessary in the future by the Commission. To have staff present the new proposed ordinance in its final form at the October Commission meeting." Pierce/Crecy All Ayes FILMING POLICY Motion: "To request staff to return to the October meeting with recommended changes in the film permit with added details regarding the processing fee of $300 vs the permit fee of $500." Reviczky/Crecy All Ayes ENTRY SIGNS Motion: "Staff will prepare the final presentation for City Council and bring it to the Commission for a final review at the October meeting." Reviczky/Blaco All Ayes BUDGET APPROPRIATION Motion: "To approve staff recommendation." Pierce/Reviczky All Ayes LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND SOUTH BAY CENTER FOR COUNSELING Motion: "To approve lease agreement as submitted." Blaco/Crecy All Ayes 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMMO TO: Commission DATE:. Sept. 25, 1989 RE: Budget Appropriation FROM: Alana Mastrian-Handman ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** Staff is recommending the Commission approve an additional appropriation of $10,000 for carpeting for the second floor of the Community Center and the Theatre Lobby and recommend this to the City Council for approval. This item was not included in the original CIP Budget of the City as staff felt it was possible to get through one more year with the existing carpeting. Since that time, however, some of the seams have come apart and it is not possible to repair them. They presently represent a hazard. The original thought wasto replace just the hall carpeting but in speaking to various vendors, it would be less expensive to do all of the area at once instead of piecemeal. Should the Commission approve this and make the recommendation to the City Council, this would become a Capital Improvement Project and would be implemented through the Public Works Dept. Our department would assist. 1 March 20, 1990 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of March 27, 1990 HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT FEBRUARY 1990 Staff reports were prepared for the following: 1. 2 Tentative Parcel Maps 2. 3 Text Amendments 3. 2 Conditional Use Permits (Condominiums) 4. 1 Conditional Use Permit (Commercial) 5. 1 Lot Line Adjustment 7. 1 Appeal of Planning Commission granting a Conditional Use Permit for general alcoholic beverages. 8. 1 Variance 9. 1 Zone Change 10. 1 Definition of Hardship for fee waiver 11. 1 Review of revised plan for Vasek Polak 12. WAVE vehicle use for St. Patrick's Day 13. Community Development Block Grant Program The following activities were undertaken for transit projects: 1. Routine tasks. Meetings and seminars attended by.. the Planning Department Staff: 1. 31 meetings Budget Update: Ending 02/28/90, revenues were 23% above budget for 66% of FY 89-90. Ending 02/28/90, expenditures were 9.9% below budget for 66% of FY 89-90. Transit Update: "WAVE" Dial -A -Ride Ridership: 02/90 02/89 Hermosa Beach Passengers 728 749 Redondo Beach Passengers 3,833 3,981 Satellite Passengers 367 521 Last FY FY to Date to Date 7,353 5,623 35,653 34,567 2,972 3,732 Upcoming agenda items to City Council: 1. 1 Text Amendment regarding height of hedges and fences 2. 1 Power Street grading plan 3. 1 Air Quality Management Plan 4. 1 Special Study to rezone Area B 5. 1 Text Amendment regarding height of hedges and fences 6. 1 Text Amendment regarding 17' parking setback CONCUR: i 1',(--// Michael Schubach Planning Director NOTED: Kevin B. Northeraft City Manager 2 Respectfully submitted, 614-1114.2, r 41-Leit/Milat,i Andrea N. Anderson Planning Aide March 12, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council March 27, 1990 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - FEBRUARY 1990 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering ana Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration function coordinates and blends the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager; includes engineering and management of capital improvement projects. Permits Issued: Type Current Month Last FY To Date This Month FY Last FY To Date Sewer Demolition Sewer Lateral Street Excavation Utility Co's only Dumpster/Strand Banner Permits 5 4 23 38 3 2 11 . 13 15 12 65 65 15 15 121 174 O 0 15 17 O 1 7 7 ENGINEERING The Capital Improvement Projects which are currently -4 are: CIP 85-102 CIP 85-137 CIP CIP CIP CIP CIP CIP CIP CIP CIP 89-141 89-142 89-148 89-149 89-150 88-174 88-406 88-407 89-506 Highland Ave. Wide. FAU, Asphaltic Over- lay, Valley/Ardmore Pavement Mgmt. System Sidewalk Repairs Trash Enclosures Bus Shelters Misc. Traf. Sig. Imp. Overlay Prospect Sewer Rehab/Area 4 Sewer Bonding Various Park Imp. CIP 89-512 CIP 89-516 CIP CIP CIP CIP CIP CIP CIP 89-517 89-518 89-519 89-601 89-604 89-615 89-701 MAINTENANCE progress Basketball Courts 6th St. & Prospect Park Recreational Fac. Recreational Fac. Hermosa Parks Fuel Tanks Var. Bldg. Imp. Comm. Ctr. Fire Alarm City Parking Lot Imp. The maintenance function of the Public Works Department is divided into the following sections: - Parks/Medians - Street Maintenance/Sanitation - Sewer and Storm Drains - Street Lighting - Traffic Safety - Building Maintenance - Equipment Service Parks Division/Medians: Prepared bid packages for baseball and soccer field renovation in Valley Park and for tree trimming on medians and Greenbelt area. Irrigation repairs City-wide. Irrigation repair on Hermosa Avenue and Gould Avenue medians. Removed hedges and ground cover from planter boxes. Removed Poinsettias from Pier Avenue. Street Maintenance/Sanitation: Continuing with the construction of bus benches for Hermosa Avenue, Manhattan Avenue and on Aviation Blvd. east of PCH. Repaired sand gates at Strand wall openings. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Assisted Street Maintenance Division with painting lumber for bus benches. Repaired sewer lateral at City yard. Opened beach storm drains with crawler and continued with sewer rodding throughout the City. Street Lighting: Assisted Traffic Safety with installation of new signs and sign poles City-wide. Traffic Safety Division: Continued with installation of new sign poles and signs throughout the City. Painted mechanics shop. Building Maintenance Division: Finished building trash bin enclosure at City Hall. Painted inside theatre lobby and foyer at the Community Center. Sanded and refinished wood around bar in theatre lobby. Repaired holes in stucco on the back side of bowling green building. Equipment Service: On-going maintenance of City vehicles and equipment. Respectfully s bmitted, Noted: nthony % ntich Kevin B. Northcraft 74'4-.31 Director of Public Works City Manager mon2/pwadmin :mv March 20, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 27, 1990 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, FEBRUARY 1990 Midyear Budget Review was conducted February 27, 1990. incorporated into the financial reports for February. Revisions are Preparations began for the new two year budget. Software and instructions are being modified to allow for the two year presentation. The California Society of Municipal Finance Officers notified the Finance Department that the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) received the Outstanding Certificate Award for financial reporting. The CAFR was submitted for the first time this year. 104 out of 453 cities in California received the award. STATISTICAL SECTION CURRENTMONTHI PMONTHUS ITLASTMONTH EAR I YEAR DATEO I LTOTDATYEAR R CITATION PAYMENTS 5,103 3,994 3,120 39,256 37,803 INVOICES 5 8 5 82 60 CASH RECEIPTS 1,817 1,289 1,027 10,736 9,255 WARRANTS 327 357 454 2,299 2,424 PURCHASE ORDERS 415 502 320 2,837 2,335 UUT EXEMPTIONS 620 607 598 FILED TO DATE PAYROLL FULL TIME 163 162 PART TIME 51 52 Noted: 152 47 '61411-4401 —1 No'thcra evin B. ft Viki Copeland City Manager Finance Director March 20, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of March 27, 1990 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT FEBRUARY ACTIVITY REPORT Recruitment: During the month of February the Personnel Department: * Concluded testing for the position of Community Resources Director. Nine candidates were interviewed for placement on the eligibility list. That eligibility list is on the agenda for the March 21, 1990 Civil Service Board meeting for certification. * Concluded testing for the position of General Services Director. Five candidates were interviewed for placement on the eligibility list. That eligibility list is on the agenda for the March 21, 1990 Civil Service Board meeting for certification. Labor * Relations: Processed the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) scheduled salary adjustment for the Police Association. Effective March 1, 1990 Police Officer's and Sergeant's salaries increased 7%; Commander's salaries increased 4%. Risk Management: * Department staff attended in reporting requirements as a result of passage of Act of 1989. two for the seminars Workers' Workers' regarding changes Compensation claims Compensation Reform General Appropriations Secretary: The General Appropriations Secretary performs secretarial support services for all City Departments as well as directory assistance for incoming calls and processing the City's mail. The following summary indicates the amount of time spent on each of the assig- ned functions. February: 150 hours available Word Processing* 71% (105.50 hrs) Avg. 7.03 hrs/day Finance: City Manager: Planning: Public Works: Personnel: Respectfully su Mail Processing Directory/Dept Support 14% (21.50 hrs) 15% (23 hrs) Avg. 1.43 hrs/day Avg. 1.53 hrs/day 18% (19.00 7% ( 7.00 26% (27.00 25% (26.50 25% (26.00 .tted, Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director hrs) hrs) hrs) hrs) hrs) Noted. evin B. Northcraft City Manager March 14, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of March 27, 1990 GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT FEBRUARY ACTIVITY REPORT PARKING ENFORCEMENT Last Current This Month Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Month Last Year To Date To Date Parking Cites Issued 6,639 5,435 57,670 54,646 Vehicles Impounded/Booted 26 22 278 292 Calls Responded To 98 99 1,022 961 Booting Revenue $1,528 $5,280 $26,411 $38,330 ANIMAL CONTROL Citations Issued 86 50 646 412 Warnings Issued 0 0 0 1 Complaints Responded To 54 48 458 366 Total Number of Animals 51 37 449 385 Picked -Up of which: Returned to Owner 10 14 130 112 Taken to Shelter 13 8 153 129 Injured, taken to Vet 1 0 21 14 Deceased 27 15 139 133 CONCUR: A. Respectfully submitted, Henry L. Staten, Acting Director by hz,,,,6 7, -7 -e -e -g -e - Michele D. Tercero, Henry L. Staten, Acting Administrative Aide General Services Director Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council March 27, 1990. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES FEBRUARY, 1990 ACTIVITY REPORT The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of February. -RECREATION PROGRAMMING ▪ The 38th Annual Sand & Strand Run was held on Sunday, February 11, 1990. There were 365 participants which is an increase of 42% over last year. ▪ Easter festivities scheduled for April are currently in the process of being organized. The City is graciously accepting the assistance of volunteers to help with the following activities: April 9 - "Paint the Town Spring" - Children from the Community can paint downtown merchants windows. April 10, 11, 12 - Free movies for children to be shown at the Hermosa Civic Theatre. Show time 2:00 PM. April 14 - 4th Annual Easter Egg Hunt at Valley Park. Residents only. February 13 - Staff met with Roger Preuss (Hermosa Valley School Vice Principal) and new "After School Activity Program" staff to discuss school rules and regulations and program expectations. The school is very pleased with the program, especially since new staff has been assigned (as of February 1, 1990). Currently enrolled are 157 children. SPECIAL EVENTS . February 27 - Staff met with the International Surf Festival Committee. The dates for the 1990 Festival are set for August 2, 3, 4 and 5. Hermosa Beach will host the same events as held previously; Power Lounging, Fishing Derby and the Pier to Pier Swim. COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION February 1 - Cable (Channel 10) aired a session of Community Focus that featured two Foundation Board Members as they publicized the 7th Annual Gala. February 3. - The Community Center Foundation held a Mask Building Party at the Clark Building, approximately 30 individuals attended and assembled an array of beautiful masks for friends, spouses and themselves. • February 24 - The 7th Annual Gala and Mardi Gras Costume Ball was held at the Hermosa Civic Theatre. There were 321 tickets sold with revenues totaling $10,875.00 • February 28 - Staff took Foundation Board Members and Commissioners on a tour of the Community Center Facility. FILM PERMITS • Two permits were processed for three days of filming in February. Permit fees of $1,850 were collected on behalf of the City. MISCELLANEOUS • The Lainie Kazan show "Legendary Ladies of Jazz," scheduled for March 31,' has been changed to June 23, 1990. Curtain 8:00 PM. FACILITY RESERVATIONS • There are currently 61 facility users. • In February the department processed 15 facility reservations. Facility User Hours Field 65 Theatre 81 Clark 182 Gym 212 Room 4 82 Room 7 10 Room 8 93 Room 10 68 Room 12 89 DEPARTMENT REVENUE Current This Month FY Last Fy Month Last Fy To Date To Date $24,161.67 $13,335.75 $181,412.77 $136,754.02 Revenue Projection: $249,650 -Community Resources Department general fund revenue for 66% of the fiscal year is $181,412.77 or 72% of the projected figure. Concur: Respectfully submitted, Ma y Rooney D rector Dept. of Community Resources Noted: evin B. North raft City Manager 3 Terri Edison Acting Coordinator HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT CALENDAR YEAR 1990 FEBRUARY OFFENSES REPORTED CURRENT MONTH CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE LAST CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE 1. Murder 0 0 0 0 2. Rape a 0 0 0 3. Robbery 1 6 7 6 4. Assault 12 10 19 23 5. Burglary - 25 16 55 47 6. Larceny 23 33 72 77 7. Motor Vehicle Theft ' 14 11 23 20 8. DUI 29 12 65 28 9. All Other Offenses 301 222 647 428 10. 415 CalTs 178 * 358 * PERSONS ARRESTED I RPU I £ , m.r V1. i CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE LAST CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE 1. Adults 72 69 172 133 2. Juveniles 1 0 1 0 3. Criminal Citations 141 45 330 86 4. 5-24/5-42 HB K 5- 0 8 0 I RPU I £ , m.r V1. i CURRENT MONTH CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE LAST CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE ACCIDENTS 0 0 0 0 1. Fatal 2. Injury 11 10 20 25 3. Property damage only 15 18 33 39 CITATIONS 668 242 1250 726 1. Traffic Citations 2. Parking Citations 16 4 32 11 CALLS FOR SERVICE * figures not available NOTED; Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager Res'-ctfull ritted, Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE LAST CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE 1. Total Calls 2523 1599 5786 3532 * figures not available NOTED; Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager Res'-ctfull ritted, Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety Honorable Mayor and March 15, 1990 Members of the City Council ACTIVITY REPORT DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY FEBRUARY, 1990 Attached for your information are recap sheets of department ac- tivity for the month of February. Overall permit activity remained steady in February as the department issued 62 permits of which 25 were building permits. Seven permits were issued for single family dwellings and two permits were issued for new commercial buildings. Ten permits were, issued for alterations or additions to existing dwellings. Three dwelling units were demolished resulting in a net increase of four dwelling units to the housing inventory. Building Department general fund revenue for 66.670 of the fiscal year is $241,698.57 or 65.1% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. Total revenue for all funds is $460,838.04. The Business License division reports that 217 licenses were is- sued during February resulting in revenue of $31,672.28. Business License revenue to date represents 60.28% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. The department logged 20 new code enforcement complaints during February, of which one was for an illegal dwelling unit. Two cases were closed and the department currently has twenty-five illegal dwelling unit cases under investigation. Noted: City Manager Respectfully Submitted, William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT Month of FEBRUARY 1990 NUMBER OF CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY PERMITS LAST FY DATE TO DATE. Building 25 21 205 255 Plumbing 15 28 218 200 Electric 22 19 190 184 Plan Check 16 16 112 118 Sewer Use 6 1 18 15 Res. Bldg.Reports 11 24 185 285 Comm. Inspections 16 20 121 129 Parks & Recreation 1 0 2 5 In lieu Park & Rec. 3 2 20 23 Board of Appeals 0 0 3 1 Sign Review 3 3 28 18 Fire Flow Fees 10 8 58 77 TOTALS 128 142 1,160 1,310 FEES Building** 17,796.90. 16,576.62 105,604.15 128,530.13 Plumbing 1,818.00 3,308.00 25,779.00 20,041.00 Electric 1,276.00 1,173.00 29,939.50 24,559.00 Plan Check 9,197.95 13,694.94 70,065.92 98,689.61 Sewer Use 4,668.34 965.00 10,326.30 12,172.62 Res. Bldg. Reports 440.00 920.00 6,360.00 11,368.00 Comm. Inspections 400.00 500.00 3,025.00 3,360.00 Parks & Recreation 3,500.00 0 7,000.00 37,102.00 In lieu Park & Rec. 17,160.00 16,335.00 124,971.00 114,345.00 Board of Appeals 0 0 225.00' 75.00 Sign Review 75.00 75.00 700.00 400.00 Fire Flow Fees 15,067.00 29,049.50 76,842.17 109,365.59 TOTALS 71,339.19 82,597.06 460,838.04 560,007.95 VALUATIONS 1,853,549 1,484,935 10,296,708 8,989,302 **Includes State Seismic Fee $130.07 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED Month of FEBRUARY 1990 TYPE OF STRUCTURE DWELLING UNITS PERMITS PROVIDED VALUATION 1. Single Dwellings 7 7 1,202,366 2. Duplex Dwellings 3. Triplex Dwellings 4. Four Units or More 5. Condominiums 6. Commercial Buildings 2 580,651 7. Industrial Buildings 8. Publicly Owned Buildings 9. Garages - Residential 10. Accessory Buildings 11. Fences and Walls 12. Swimming Pools 13. Alterations, additions or repairs to dwellings 10 66,032 14. Alterations, additions or repairs to Commercial Bldgs. 2 4,000 15. Alterations, additions or repairs to indus. bldgs. 16. Alterations, additions or repairs to publicly owned bldgs. 17. Alterations, additions, repairs to garages or accessory bldgs. 18. Signs 19. Dwelling units moved 20. Dwelling units demolished 2 -3 21. All other permits not listed 2 500 TOTAL PERMITS 25 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: 1,853,549 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED : 7 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DEMOLISHED: 3 NET CHANGE: +4 NET DWELLING UNIT CHANGE FY 89/90 +30 CUMULATIVE DWELLING UNIT TOTAL: 10,078 (INCLUDES PERMITS ISSUED) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: William Grove, Building & Safety Director FROM: Mary Fehskens, Business License Inspector RE: Monthly report for February DATE: March 12, 1990 CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY $31,672.28 $19,822.58 FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE $247,167.87 $267,656.43 Business Licenses Renewed New licenses issued during Febraury 1990 Out of city licenses 35 Home Occupation license 7 New business licenses issued 6 New owners of existing business 1 49 168 Total HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT CALENDAR YEAR 1990 FEBRUARY FIRE STATISTICS PARAMEDIC STATISTICS CURRENT MONTH ' THIS MONTH LAST YEAR CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE LAST -CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE 1. Total Calls 57 71 131 166 (TYPE) a. False Alarm 7 5 11 8 b. Mutual Aid 1 0 2 0 c. Paramedic Assists 25 30 60 77 d. Residence Fire 8 8 14 17 e. Commercial Fire 2 4 5 7 f. Vehicle Fire 3 1 4 6 g. Hazardous Mtls. 2 2 8 5 h. Other 9 21 27 46 PARAMEDIC STATISTICS 1. Mutual Aid CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE LAST CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE 1. Total Responses 66 65 150 167 (TYPE) a. No Patient/Aid 6 6 16 18 b. Medical 31 23 72 68 c. Trauma 29 36 62 81 1. Mutual Aid 0 0 2 0 2. Auto Accident 11 11 23 27 3. Strand Accident 4 5 8 8 4. Assault 7 8 12 17 5. Jail 2 5 6 11 6. Transports 40 30 87 82 7. Base Hosp.Con. 23 14 52 44 8. Trauma Center 1 2 3 3 INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE LAST CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE 1. Commercial 20 53 72 115 2. Assembly 2 0 2 0 3. Apartments 31 26 55 52 4. Fumigations 5 9 15 26 5. Institutions 0 0 0 0 6. Industrial 0 0 0 5 NOTED: Kevin B. Northcralt, City Manager fully tted, Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety