Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/24/90HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL April 11, 1990 Regular Meetingof April 24, 1990 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #20210 (C.U.P. CON NO. 88-27) LOCATION: 514 HERMOSA AVENUE APPLICANT: TIM HART AND GEORGE ADAMS REQUEST: APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP FOR 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM_ PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #20210 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #20210 at their November 1, 1988 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: Michael Schu•ach Planning Director fLoiLQ Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager T/srfinmap Respectfully submitted, Ken Robertson Associate Planner a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMQSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #20210 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 514 HERMOSA AVENUE, HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting :on April 24, 1990 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with C. Section Code; The development 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity. and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 88-91, adop- ted after public hearing on November 1, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel. Map #20210 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State: of California, being a Subdivision of a portion of Lot 8,. Block 38, First Addition to Hermosa Beach, as recorded in Book 1, Pages 59 and 60 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 514 Hermosa Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and'AOOPTED this 24th day of April, 1990. ATTEST: T/rsfinmap PRESIDENT of the City.. Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. CITY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low• profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by visitor/users; led by a City Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers \; r THE'HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beacb bas the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The. Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considaered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. • .• • GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen- • das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. An Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Diacuasion. Public Hearings . Public Hearings are held on -certain matters an required by lay. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of'public importance for Wuich .there ie,,no legal requirement to conduct an=advent*ed Public 'Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All • ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least.one week later.Council•may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications • The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting. Miscellaneous Items and Reports .-.City !tanager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items -to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, • usually having arisen since. the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of the City Council may place items on .the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- • gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business district. • \ r "A friend is a person who knows you and still likes you." -Unknown AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 24, 1990 - Council Chambers, City Hall MAYOR Roger Creighton MAYOR PRO TEM Chuck Sheldon COUNCILMEMBERS Robert Essertier Kathleen Midstokke Albert Wiemans Closed Session - 7:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER Gary L.:Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PROCLAMATIONS: Older Americans Month, May, 1990 (to be accepted Senior's Club President Bessie Nelson) CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the item is called. Citizen comments on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction will be provided time at the end of the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on March 27, 1990; 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on April 10, 1990. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. Recommendation to Agenda Items. Recommendation to financial reports: 1) Revenue and e 2) City Treasure receive and file Tentatige Future receive and file the March, 1990 xpenditure report; r's report. (e -j, 17 Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #20210 for a two -unit condominium located at 514 Hermosa Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 11, 1990. Recommendation to authorize purchase of a 1990 Nissan pick-up truck for the Building and Safety Department. Memorandum from Building Director William Grove dated March 28, 1990. (Continued from 4/10/90 meeting.) Recommendation to receive and file report on charges to the Street Lighting and Crossing Guard Assessment Dis- tricts. (Requested at 3/27/90 meeting.) Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated April 2, 1990. (Continued from 4/10/90 meeting.) Recommendation to approve request for use of Community Center front lawn for Christmas tree lot during the holiday season. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1990. (Continued from 4/10/90 meeting.) Recommendation to approve Beach Baseball Over the Line Pro and Community Tournaments. Memorandum from Communi- ty Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1990. (Continued from 4/10/90 meeting.) Recommendation to approve specifications for CIP 89-518, Playground Equipment and authorize staff to advertise for bids on this project. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated April 2, 1990. Recommendation to accept as complete, Highland Avenue widening, CIP 85-102. Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Anthony Antich dated April 12, 1990. (1) Recommendation to accept as complete, work performed by Moffatt & Nichol for pier repairs. Memorandum from (j) (k) (n) (o) (p) Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated April 16, 1990. Recommendation to approve report for proposals for con- sultant services to prepare a records management system. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated April 10, 1990. . Recommendation to approve memorandum proposal (on behalf of the City of Hermosa Beach) to the Office of Traffic Safety in order to obtain grant funding for a project to identify high accident locations and to study neighbor- hood traffic intrusion. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated April 12, 1990. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #19790 for a four -unit condominium located at 1419-1423 Manhattan Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 16, 1990. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #19969 for a two -unit condominium located at 918 Seventh Street. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 16, 1990. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) ORDINANCE NO. 90-1026 - AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS FOR ALL PROPOSED COMMER- CIAL AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENTS, AND FOR ALL PRO- POSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS OF TWO DWELLING UNITS OR GREATER AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLA- RATION. For adoption. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Project Touch, 1736 Family Crisis Center, South Bay Free Clinic, South Bay Juvenile Diversion, dated March 20, 1990, regarding C.D.B.G. funding to non- profit organizations. (Request by Councilman Sheldon to agendize.) Continued from 4/10/90 meeting. (b) Letter from June Williams, 2065 Manhattan Avenue, dated March 22, 1990, with supplemental letter dated April 7, 1990, regarding the homeless. (Request by Councilmember Midstokke to agendize.) Continued from 4/10/90 meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. PROPOSED ZONE CHANGES FOR NORTHERN PORTION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION AS FOLLOWS OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONES AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION: 74//1-) grA(4,9 / j A. FROM C-3, R-1 & R-3 TO COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA FOR THE AREA ALONG FAST AND WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY FROM PIER AVENUE TO 24TH STREET, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION; B. FROM R-3 TO R-2 FOR THE AREA ON EAST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BETWEEN 20TH STREET AND 21ST STREET, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 16, 1990. 6. PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT RE. 17 FT. PARKING: SETBACK AND CONSIDERATION OF THE ELIMINATION OF SETBACK REQUIREMENT FROM ALLEYS AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 16, 1990. 7. APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR ROBERTS LIQUORS, 74 PIER AVENUE. Memorandum from Planning Di- rector Michael Schubach dated April 17, 1990. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. REPORT ON COMMUNITY CENTER REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1990. Continued from 4/24/90 meeting. RECOMMENDATION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO HANDBILLS AND ADVER- TISING. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated April 2, 1990. Continued from 4/24/90 meeting. REQUEST FOR FUNDING FROM CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR, COMMUTER EXPRESS PARTICIPATION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 16, 1990. 11. REQUEST FOR REDIRECTION ON PROSPECT SCHOOL HOUSE. Memo- randum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated 12. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AND FACILITATE THE IMPLEMENTA- TION OF A FARMERS MARKET PER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REQUEST. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated 13. PROPOSED NEW CHAP ' 19 OF THE HERMOSA CODE ENTITLE t, ; - tlR VEHICLES AN DINANCE F ,� ' ' 0 DUCTION . Mem Director A`Hthony Antich dated M rch CH MUNICIPAL WITH OR - from Public Works 6, 1990. 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 15. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Report from Councilmember Midstokke on the South Bay Sanitation District and Solid Waste Management Act of 1989 meetings held on April 18,:1990. 16. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request by Councilmember Midstokke for discussion of parking requirements for restaurants and hotels. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. ADJOURNMENT IN MEMORY OP FORMER CITY CLERK BARBARA FLEMING WHO SERVED AS DEPUTY CITY CLERK FROM 1965 TO 1971, THEN AS ELECTED CITY CLERK UNTIL HER RETIREMENT IN 1978. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, April 10, 1990 at the hour of 7:43 P.M.: including a Joint Meeting at 8:00 P.M. with the Hermosa Beach City School Board on the Oil Drilling Environ- mental Report. CLOSED SESSION - held pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding Real Property negotiations; a Council subcommittee report to the City Council concerning Macpherson Oil and the City Yard/Tidelands Oil Lease at the hour of 7:10 P.M., adjourning at 7:34 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Ed Lee, Deputy City Attorney ROLL CALL: Present: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton Absent: None CONSIDERATION OF HOLDING OVER CERTAIN ITEMS The City Manager recommended holding over Agenda items 4(a), 7 and 8 to the next meeting due to the length of the Agenda. Hearing no objections, Mayor Creighton so ordered that Agenda items 4(a), 4(b), 7 and 8 be held over to the April 24, 1990 meeting. INTRODUCTION OF MARY ROONEY, NEWLY APPOINTED'COMMUNITY RESOURCES DIRECTOR. PROCLAMATIONS: Earth Day 1990, April 22, 1990 Mary Rooney read the proclamation and the Mayor presented the proclamation to Diane Miller of the Hermosa Valley P.T.O. California Earthquake Preparedness Month, April, 1990 The City Manager read the proclamation and the Mayor presented the proclamation to Steve Wisniewski, Public Safety Director. Medal of Valor Week, April 8-14, 1990 The City Manager read the proclamation and the Mayor presented the proclamation to Wes Bush, Director of the Chamber of Commerce. CITIZEN COMMENTS Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street 1 a cap 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (1) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (f) Creighton, (g) Midstokke, (h) Wiemans, (i) Essertier and Wiemans, and (j) Sheldon. Motion Midstokke, second Creighton. So ordered. (a) (b) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on March 27, 1990. (This item is to be continued as the minutes will not be available until the April 24, 1990 meeting.) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 33046, and 33048 through 33142 inclusive, noting voided warrants 33049, 33050, 33088 and 33089, and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer; Nos. 32477, 32631, 32647, 33020, and 33021. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file March, 1990 invest- ment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated April 5, 1990. (e) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #20557 for a two -unit condominium located at 1737 Pros- pect Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 2, 1990. (f) (g) Action: To adopt Resolution No.90-5353, entitled, "A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #20557 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1737 PROS- PECT AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Recommendation to authorise purchase of a 1990 Nissan pick-up truck for the Building and Safety Department. Memorandum from Building Director William Grove dated March 28, 1990. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Mayor Creighton for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To continue to the April 24, 1990 meeting. Recommendation to receive and file report on charges to the Street Lighting and Crossing Guard Assessment Dis- tricts. (Requested at 3/27/90 meeting.) Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated April 2, 1990. Supplemental memorandum from Councilmember Midstokke, dated April 10,1990. 2 (h) (i) (j) (k) (1) This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Councilmember Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To continue to the April 24, 1990 meeting. Recommendation to approve request for use of Community Center front lawn for Christmas tree lot during the holiday season. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1990. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Councilmember Wiemans for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To continue to the April 24, 1990 meeting. Recommendation to approve Beach Baseball Over the Line Pro and Community Tournaments. Memorandum from Communi- ty Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1990. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Councilmembers Wiemans and Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To continue to the. April 24, 1990 meeting. Recommendation to appropriate funds for, and to au- thorize purchase of, a mobile data terminal processor and radio base station. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated March 27, 1990. Action: To approve staff's alternative recommendation to enter into a lease/purchase agreement if this would be more advantageous financially. Motion Sheldon, second Mayor Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to approve request for proposal for audit preparation. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated April 3, 1990. Recommendation to receive and file response to City Council questions of March 27, 1990, pertaining to tree maintenance. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated April 4, 1990. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 90-1026 - AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS FOR ALL PROPOSED COMMER- CIAL AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENTS, AND FOR ALL PRO- POSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS OF TWO DWELLING UNITS OR GREATER AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLA- RATION. For adoption. Proposed Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 90-1026 Motion Sheldon, died for lack of second. Action: To re -introduce Ordinance No. 90-1026 with a six-month clause rather than one year, amending Page 4, Section 3, Line 8 1/2 to read,"...within six (6) months of the effective date...". Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. Ayes: Essertier, Midstokke, Wiemans Noes: Sheldon, Mayor Creighton Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 90-1026, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS FOR ALL PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENTS, AND FOR ALL PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS OF TWO DWELLING UNITS OR GREATER AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. Ayes: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton Noes: None (b) ORDINANCE NO. 90-1027 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO CREATE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 7, FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED AND SHOWN ON AT- TACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 90-1027. Motion Essertier, second Wiemans. So ordered. Ayes: Essertier, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton Noes: Midstokke 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items (f), (g), (h), (i), and (j) were discussed at this time but are listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) (b) Letter from Project Touch, 1736 Family Crisis Center, South Bay Free Clinic, South Bay Juvenile Diversion, dated March 20, 1990, regarding C.D.B.G. funding to non- profit organizations. (Request by Councilmember Sheldon to agendize.) Action: To continue to the April 24, 1990 meeting. Letter from June Williams, 2065 Manhattan Avenue, dated March 22, 1990, regarding the homeless. (Request by Councilmember Midstokke to agendize.) - 4 - Action: To continue to the April 24, 1990 meeting. The meeting recessed at 8:02 P.M. The Meeting reconvened at 8:15 P.M. CONVENE JOINT MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL AND HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON AGENDA ITEM 5A., THE OIL DRILLING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT President Weiss called the School Board to order. Present: Gonzales, Kelsey, President Weiss Absent: Mark, Meyer 5A. CERTIFICATION OF OIL DRILLING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT RE- PORT, WITH RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 3, 1990. Supplemental letter from Brent R. Harris, dated April 9, 1990. Revised resolution for City Council adoption. Deputy City Attorney Lee explained the role of each body with regard to this item. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach. Consultants Peter Cowan and Dennis Allen, of Ultra Sys- tems Environmental Services, made a presentation and responded to questions by the City Council and the School Board. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Applicant: Don Macpherson Proponent: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street Opponents: J.R. Reviczky - 600 Ardmore George Sacks - 225 Valley Drive Etta Simpson - 651 25th Street Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, submitted documents to the City. Harvey Cowan - 523 Third Street Brent Harris - 1416 Monterey Blvd. Janice Bock - 446 Monterey Blvd., #3E Ken Conklin - 501 Fourth Street Melanie Wells - 315 Fourth Street Beth Harris - 416 Monterey Blvd. Mike Wells - 315 Fourth Street, presented each Council Member with a Kennedy -head, 50 cent coin. Response: Don Macpherson, applicant, responded to public hearing comments. Ivan Tether of Hanna And Morton Law Firm, representing Mr. Macpherson, res- ponded to questions. Also responding to Council/ School Board questions were: Peter Cowan and Cecil Sterling, of Ultra Systems; applicant Macpherson; Director Schubach; and Deputy City Attorney Lee. 5 The Public Hearing was closed. The meeting recessed at 10:25 P.M. RECONVENE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING: The regular, City Council meeting was reconvened at 10:43 P.M. Action: To consider alternatives suggested by the Planning Commission and remove all oil and production facilities off South School and onto City Yard only. Motion Sheldon, Second Wiemans. So ordered. Deputy City Attorney Lee and Director Schubach responded to Council questions. Proposed Action: Adopt Resolution No. 90- , enti- tled, "A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE ZONING CODE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS". Motion Essertier, second Wiemans. Motion failed. Ayes: Essertier, Wiemans Noes: Midstokke, Sheldon, Mayor Creighton. Action: To renotice and continue to the May 8, 1990 meeting; for an expanded, more comprehensive, noise study with additional measurements during normal, night time, sleeping hours; for a written opinion from the City Attorney regarding the letter from the State Lands Commission dated March 6,1990, the letter from the Department of Conservation dated November 25,1987, and the Goleta decision; for a staff report on a noise level requirement more stringent than the minimum required by the City's Noise Ordinance and Oil Code since the project would be in 24 hour operation; a reason why important issues now being handled in the Conditional Use Permit should not be addressed first in the Environmental Impact Report; for an answer to the possibility of requiring the applicant to meet future advancements in technology as they arise; and, a limitation on the number of wells. Motion Midstokke, second Sheldon. So ordered. 5B. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR OIL DRILLING, WITH RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 3, 1990. Action: To continue to the May 8, 1990 meeting. So ordered. 5C. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ZONING CODE FOR OIL DRILLING, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 3, 1990. Action: To continue to the May 8, 1990 meeting. So ordered. 6. FIRST QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS AND/OR ZONE CHANG- ES FOR GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING INCONSISTENCIES: A. AREA 10 (BETWEEN BARNEY COURT AND MEYER COURT, FROM SOUTH CITY BOUNDARY TO THE REAR OF THE LOTS FRONT- ING ON SECOND STREET), GENERAL PLAN CHANGE FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, WITH RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION Mayor Creighton declared a conflict of interest since he owns property within 300 feet of the subject area and left the dais, and the room, during consideration of the item. Mayor Pro Tem Sheldon chaired this portion of the meeting. Councilmember Midstokke said that although she resides within 300 feet of the subject area, she does not own property within the area, and therefore, pursuant to rulings by the City Attorney and the Fair Political Practice Commission, there is no conflict of interest, thus allowing her to participate. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 2, 1990. Supplemental letters from Bonnie Wulff dated April 9, 1990; and Brigido Farfan, dated April 10, 1990. A staff report was given by Associate Planner, Ken Robertson. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming Forward to speak in favor of R -2B were: Frank Fernandez - 1010 First Street Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street Jerry Compton - 200 Pier Avenue, #9 Jack Andren - 521 Gentry Street Steve Harris - 23 Barney Court, submitted letter from lending institution. Speaking in favor of R-1 were: Sam Edgerton - 1118 Second Street - submitted information on former petitions. Steven Crecy - 1148 Second Street Mike Meyers - 1104 First Street Guy Elefski - 1115 First Street Joanne Zambrano - 1118 Second Street Ruth Brand - 1231 First Street Dennis Cleland - 434 28th Street Roger Gillespie - 1026 Second Street Council member Midstokke wanted the record to reflect two phone callers in favor of R-1: Jack Duer - 1110 Second Street Patricia Gazin - 1250 First Street B. The Public Hearing was closed at 12: Proposed Action: To bring the zoning with the General Plan and lower the Motion Essertier, second Midstokke. action. AYES: Essertier, Midstokke NOES: Sheldon, Wiemans 00 A.M. into conformance zoning to R-1. Motion tied, no Proposed Action: To leave the area R -2B with a 25 foot height limit. Motion Wiemans. Died for lack of a second. Action: To continue to the May 8, 1990 meeting and apply a Rule of Necessity to allow Mayor Creighton to cast the tie -breaking vote. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. Further Action: To direct the City Attorney to advise Mayor Creighton, and the City Manager, as to The Mayor's ability to vote on this issue at that meeting. Motion Sheldon, second Essertier. So ordered. Mayor Creighton returned to the dais. SE CORNER ARTESIA AND PROSPECT TO HARPER AVENUE GENERAL PLAN CHANGE FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND ZONE CHANGE FROM R -P TO SPECIFIC PLAN AREA (R-3 DENSITY, R-2 STANDARDS) THE RESIDENTIAL POR- TION, AND ZONE CHANGE FROM R -P TO C-2 THE COMMERCIAL PORTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY, WITH RESOLUTION FOR ADOP- TION AND ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Action: To open the Public Hearing and continue Item 6B to the May 8, 1990 meeting. So ordered. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. REPORT ON COMMUNITY CENTER REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1990. Action: To continue to the April 24, 1990 meeting. 8. RECOMMENDATION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO HANDBILLS AND ADVER- TISING. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated April 2, 1990. Action: To continue to the April 24, 1990 meeting. 9. RECOMMENDATION ON EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIR. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated April 5, 1990. Supplemental memorandum from Public Works Super- visor Vernon Highfield, dated April 9, 1990. - 8 - A staff report was presented by the City Manager, who indicated that the contractor had agreed to do the work with his crew within 14 calendar days. Action: To authorize staff to award the contract to the low bidder of Colich and Sons for emergency repair of the sanitary sewer on Myrtle Avenue between 24th and 25th Streets at a cost, not to exceed, $60,165.00, in- cluding a 20% contingency. Motion Midstokke, second Sheldon. So ordered 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER: None 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL: None 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL: None CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, submitted hotel information. Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive ADJOURNMENT: The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, April 11, 1990, at the hour of 12:53 A.M. to a Closed Session to be held on Tuesday, April 24, 1990 at the hour of 7:00 P.M., followed by a Regular Meeting at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Deputy City Clerk 9 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 90- A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO CONSIDER A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO PROHIBIT THE SALE OF SINGLE CONTAINERS OF ALCOHOL FROM STORES LOCATED NEAR THE PUBLIC BEACH WHEREAS, the public drinking of alcoholic beverages on and near the beach is an ongoing problem, causing a nuisance to residents and visitors to Hermosa Beach, and contributing to noise and litter problems, and; WHEREAS, according to the Police Department a significant part of the problem is due to the availability for purchase of single cans and bottles of beer, wine coolers, and other alcoholic beverages from stores located in close proximity to the beach, and; WHEREAS, the prohibition of the sales of single containers of alcoholic beverages from locations near the beach would contribute towards a reduction in these problems and, therefore, would benefit the public health, safety, and welfare, and; WHEREAS, the City Council desires to study and consider a zoning ordinance amendment to resolve this problem, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby direct staff to study and consider a zoning ordinance amendment for consideration by the Planning Commission to prohibit the sale of single containers of alcohol in those areas of the City determined to be problem areas, and schedule the appropriate public hearings for said amendments. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1990. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FO OrAtuf.._ Ihge CITY CLERK SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION CITY ATTORNEY a/rsintent - 1 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 90- A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO CONSIDER A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO PROHIBIT THE SALE OF SINGLE CONTAINERS OF ALCOHOL FROM STORES LOCATED NEAR THE PUBLIC BEACH WHEREAS, the public drinking of alcoholic beverages on and near the beach is an ongoing problem, causing a nuisance to residents and visitors to Hermosa Beach, and contributing to noise and litter problems, and; WHEREAS, according to the Police Department a significant part of the problem is due to the availability for purchase of single cans and bottles of beer, wine coolers, and other alcoholic beverages from stores located in close proximity to the beach, and; WHEREAS, the prohibition of the sales of single containers of alcoholic beverages from locations near the beach would contribute towards a reduction in these problems and, therefore, would benefit the public health, safety, and welfare, and; WHEREAS, the City Council desires to study and consider a zoning ordinance amendment to resolve this problem, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby direct staff to study and consider a zoning ordinance amendment for consideration by the Planning Commission to prohibit the sale of single containers of alcohol in those areas of the City determined to be problem areas, and schedule the appropriate public hearings for said amendments. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1990. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FO gsve CITY ATTORNEY a/rsintent CITY CLERK SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION - 1 - MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, April 10, 1990 at the hour of 7:43 P.M.: including a Joint Meeting at 8:00 P.M. with the Hermosa Beach City School Board on the Oil Drilling Environ- mental Report. CLOSED SESSION - held pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding Real Property negotiations; a Council subcommittee report to the City Council concerning Macpherson Oil and the City Yard/Tidelands Oil Lease at the hour of 7:10 P.M., adjourning at 7:34 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Present: Essertier, Absent: None - Ed Lee, Deputy City Attorney Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton CONSIDERATION OF HOLDING OVER CERTAIN ITEMS The City Manager recommended holding over Agenda items 4(a), 7 and 8 to the next meeting due to the length of the Agenda. Hearing no objections, Mayor Creighton so ordered that Agenda items 4(a), 4(b), 7 and 8 be held over to the April 24, 1990 meeting. INTRODUCTION OF MARY ROONEY, NEWLY APPOINTED COMMUNITY RESOURCES DIRECTOR. PROCLAMATIONS: Earth Day 1990, April 22, 1990 Mary Rooney read the proclamation and the Mayor presented the proclamation to Diane Miller of the Hermosa Valley P.T.O. California Earthquake Preparedness Month, April, 1990 The City Manager read the proclamation and the Mayor presented the proclamation to Steve Wisniewski, Public Safety Director. Medal of Valor Week, April 6-14, 1990 The City Manager read the proclamation and the Mayor presented the proclamation to Wes Bush, Director of the Chamber of Commerce. CITIZEN COMMENTS Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street a cap 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (1) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (f) Creighton, (g) Midstokke, (h) Wiemans, (i) Essertier and Wiemans, and (j) Sheldon. Motion Midstokke, second Creighton. So ordered. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on March 27, 1990. (This item is to be continued as the minutes will not be available until the April 24, 1990 meeting.) (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 33046, and 33048 through 33142 inclusive, noting voided warrants 33049, 33050, 33088 and 33089, and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer; Nos. 32477, 32631, 32647, 33020, and 33021. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file March, 1990 invest- ment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated April 5, 1990. (e) (f) (g) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #20557 for a two -unit condominium located at 1737 Pros- pect Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 2, 1990. Action: To adopt Resolution No.90-5353, entitled, "A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #20557 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1737 PROS- PECT AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Recommendation to authorise purchase of a 1990 Nissan pick-up truck for the Building and Safety Department. Memorandum from Building Director William Grove dated March 28, 1990. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Mayor Creighton for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To continue to the April 24, 1990 meeting. Recommendation to receive and file report on charges to the Street Lighting and Crossing Guard Assessment Dis- tricts. (Requested at 3/27/90 meeting.) Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated April 2, 1990. Supplemental memorandum from Councilmember Midstokke, dated April 10,1990. 2 (h) (i) (J) (k) (1) This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Councilmember Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To continue to the April 24, 1990 meeting. Recommendation to approve request for use of Community Center front lawn for Christmas tree lot during the holiday season. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1990. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Councilmember Wiemans for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To continue to the April 24, 1990 meeting. Recommendation to approve Beach Baseball Over the Line Pro and Community Tournaments. Memorandum from Communi- ty Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1990. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Councilmembers Wiemans and Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To continue to the April 24, 1990 meeting. Recommendation to appropriate funds for, and to au- thorize purchase of, a mobile data terminal processor and radio base station. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated March 27, 1990. Action: To approve staff's alternative recommendation to enter into a lease/purchase agreement if this would be more advantageous financially. Motion Sheldon, second Mayor Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to approve request for proposal for audit preparation. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated April 3, 1990. Recommendation to receive and file response to City Council questions of March 27, 1990, pertaining to tree maintenance. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated April 4, 1990. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 90-1026 - AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS FOR ALL PROPOSED COMMER- CIAL AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENTS, AND FOR ALL PRO- POSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS OF TWO DWELLING UNITS OR GREATER AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLA- RATION. For adoption. 3 Proposed Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 90-1026 Motion Sheldon, died for lack of second. Action: To re -introduce Ordinance No. 90-1026 with a six-month clause rather than one year, amending Page 4, Section 3, Line 8 1/2 to read,"...within six (6) months of the effective date...". Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. Ayes: Essertier, Midstokke, Wiemans Noes: Sheldon, Mayor Creighton Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 90-1026, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS FOR ALL PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENTS, AND FOR ALL PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS OF TWO DWELLING UNITS OR GREATER AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. Ayes: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton Noes: None (b) ORDINANCE NO. 90-1027 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO CREATE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 7, FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED AND SHOWN ON AT- TACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 90-1027. Motion Essertier, second Wiemans. So ordered. Ayes: Essertier, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton Noes: Midstokke 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items (f), (g), (h), (i), and (j) were discussed at this time but are listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) (b) Letter from Project Touch, 1736 Family Crisis Center, South Bay Free Clinic, South Bay Juvenile Diversion, dated March 20, 1990, regarding C.D.B.G. funding to non- profit organizations. (Request by Councilmember Sheldon to agendize.) Action: To continue to the April 24, 1990 meeting. Letter from June Williams, 2065 Manhattan Avenue, dated March 22, 1990, regarding the homeless. (Request by Councilmember Midstokke to agendize.) 4 Action: To continue to the April 24, 1990 meeting. The meeting recessed at 8:02 P.M. The Meeting reconvened at 8:15 P.M. CONVENE JOINT MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL AND HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON AGENDA ITEM 5A., THE OIL DRILLING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT President Weiss called the School Board to order. Present: Gonzales, Kelsey, President Weiss Absent: Mark, Meyer 5A. CERTIFICATION OF OIL DRILLING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT RE- PORT, WITH RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 3, 1990. Supplemental letter from Brent R. Harris, dated April 9, 1990. Revised resolution for City Council adoption. Deputy City Attorney Lee explained the role of each body with regard to this item. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach. Consultants Peter Cowan and Dennis Allen, of Ultra Sys- tems Environmental Services, made a presentation and responded to questions by the City Council and the School Board. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Applicant: Don Macpherson Proponent: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street Opponents: J.R. Reviczky - 600 Ardmore George Sacks.- 225 Valley Drive Etta Simpson - 651 25th Street Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, submitted documents to the City. Harvey Cowan - 523 Third Street Brent Harris - 1416 Monterey Blvd. Janice Bock - 446 Monterey Blvd., #3E Ken Conklin - 501 Fourth Street Melanie Wells - 315 Fourth Street Beth Harris - 416 Monterey Blvd. Mike Wells - 315 Fourth Street, presented each Council Member with a Kennedy -head, 50 cent coin. Response: Don Macpherson, applicant, responded to public hearing comments. Ivan Tether of Hanna And Morton Law Firm, representing Mr. Macpherson, res- ponded to questions. Also responding to Council/ School Board questions were: Peter Cowan and Cecil Sterling, of Ultra Systems; applicant Macpherson; Director Schubach; and Deputy City Attorney Lee. The Public Hearing was closed. The meeting recessed at 10:25 P.M. RECONVENE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING: The regular City Council meeting was reconvened at 10:43 P.M. Action: To consider alternatives suggested by the Planning Commission and remove all oil and production facilities off South School and onto City Yard only. Motion Sheldon, Second Wiemans. So ordered. Deputy City Attorney Lee and Director Schubach responded to Council questions. Proposed Action: Adopt Resolution No. 90- , enti- tled, "A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE ZONING CODE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS". Motion Essertier, second Wiemans. Motion failed. Ayes: Essertier, Wiemans Noes: Midstokke, Sheldon, Mayor Creighton. Action: To renotice and continue to the May 8, 1990 meeting; for an expanded, more comprehensive, noise study with additional measurements during normal, night time, sleeping hours; for a written opinion from the City Attorney regarding the letter from the State Lands Commission dated March 6,1990, the letter from the Department of Conservation dated November 25,1987, and the Goleta decision; for a staff report on a noise level requirement more stringent than the minimum required by the City's Noise Ordinance and Oil Code since the project would be in 24 hour operation; a reason why important issues now being handled in the Conditional Use Permit should not be addressed first in the Environmental Impact Report; for an answer to the possibility of requiring the applicant to meet future advancements in technology as they arise; and, a limitation on the number of wells. Motion Midstokke, second Sheldon. So ordered. 5B. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR OIL DRILLING, WITH RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 3, 1990. Action: To continue to the May 8, 1990 meeting. So ordered. 5C. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ZONING CODE FOR OIL DRILLING, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 3, 1990. Action: To continue to the May 8, 1990 meeting. So ordered. 6. FIRST QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS AND/OR ZONE CHANG- ES FOR GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING INCONSISTENCIES: A. AREA 10 (BETWEEN BARNEY COURT AND MEYER COURT, FROM SOUTH CITY BOUNDARY TO THE REAR OF THE LOTS FRONT- ING ON SECOND STREET), GENERAL PLAN CHANGE FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, WITH RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION Mayor Creighton declared a conflict of interest since he owns property within 300 feet of the subject area and left the dais, and the room, during consideration of the item. Mayor Pro Tem Sheldon chaired this portion of the meeting. Councilmember Midstokke said that although she resides within 300 feet of the subject area, she does not own property within the area, and therefore, pursuant to rulings by the City Attorney and the Fair Political Practice Commission, there is no conflict of interest, thus allowing her to participate. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 2, 1990. Supplemental letters from Bonnie Wulff dated April 9, 1990; -and Brigido Farfan, dated April 10, 1990. A staff report was given by Associate Planner, Ken Robertson. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming Forward to speak in favor of R -2B were: Frank Fernandez - 1010 First Street Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street Jerry Compton - 200 Pier Avenue, #9 Jack Andren - 521 Gentry Street Steve Harris - 23 Barney Court, submitted letter from lending institution. Speaking in favor of R-1 were: Sam Edgerton - 1118 Second Street - submitted information on former petitions. Steven Crecy - 1148 Second Street Mike Meyers - 1104 First Street Guy Elefski - 1115 First Street Joanne Zambrano - 1118 Second Street Ruth Brand - 1231 First Street Dennis Cleland - 434 28th Street Roger Gillespie - 1026 Second Street Council member Midstokke wanted the record to reflect two phone callers in favor of R-1: Jack Duer - 1110 Second Street Patricia Gazin - 1250 First Street 7 B. The Public Hearing was closed at 12:00 A.M. Proposed Action: To bring the zoning into conformance with the General Plan and lower the zoning to R-1. Motion Essertier, second Midstokke. Motion tied, no action. AYES: Essertier, Midstokke NOES: Sheldon, Wiemans Proposed Action: To leave the area R -2B with a 25 foot height limit. Motion Wiemans. Died for lack of a second. Action: To continue to the May 8, 1990 meeting and apply a Rule of Necessity to allow Mayor Creighton to cast the tie -breaking vote. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. Further Action: To direct the City Attorney to advise Mayor Creighton, and the City Manager, as to The Mayor's ability to vote on this issue at that meeting. Motion Sheldon, second Essertier. So ordered. Mayor Creighton returned to the dais. SE CORNER ARTESIA AND PROSPECT TO HARPER AVENUE GENERAL PLAN CHANGE FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND ZONE CHANGE FROM R -P TO SPECIFIC PLAN AREA (R-3 DENSITY, R-2 STANDARDS) THE RESIDENTIAL POR- TION, AND ZONE CHANGE FROM R -P TO C-2 THE COMMERCIAL PORTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY, WITH RESOLUTION FOR ADOP- TION AND ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Action: To open the Public Hearing and continue Item 68_ to the May 8, 1990 meeting. So ordered. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. REPORT ON COMMUNITY CENTER REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1990. Action: To continue to the April 24, 1990 meeting. 8. RECOMMENDATION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO HANDBILLS AND ADVER- TISING. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated April 2, 1990. Action: To continue to the April 24, 1990 meeting. 9. RECOMMENDATION ON EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIR. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated April 5, 1990. Supplemental memorandum from Public Works Super- visor Vernon Highfield, dated April 9, 1990. A staff report was presented by the City Manager, who indicated that the contractor had agreed to do the work with his crew within 14 calendar days. Action: To authorize staff to award the contract to the low bidder of Colich and Sons for emergency repair of the sanitary sewer on Myrtle Avenue between 24th and 25th Streets at a cost, not to exceed, $60,165.00, in- cluding a 20% contingency. Motion Midstokke, second Sheldon. So ordered 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER: None 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL: None 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL: None CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, submitted hotel information. Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive ADJOURNMENT: The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, April 11, 1990, at the hour of 12:53 A.M. to a Closed Session to be held on Tuesday, April 24, 1990 at the hour of 7:00 P.M., followed by a Regular Meeting at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Deputy City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, March 27, 1990, at the hour of 7:50 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - held pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding Real Estate Negotiations: South School and Prospect Heights surplus lots, with the Hermosa Beach School District, at the hour of 7:04 P.M., adjourning at 7:43 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - June Williams ROLL CALL: Present: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton Absent: None PRESENTATION OF DONATION FOR HOLIDAY TREE LOT FROM HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB Frank Paulstein, business owner, 200 Pier Avenue, pres- ented the donation on behalf of the Kiwanis Club Founda- tion to the Community Center Foundation. Community Resources Director Mary Rooney accepted the donation. CITIZEN COMMENTS Howard Longacre, 1221 Seventh Place 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (g) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (b) Midstokke, (d) Wiemans, (e) Sheldon, (f) Midstokke, and (g) Wiemans. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. (a) (b) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on March 13, 1990; 2) Special meeting of the City Council held on March 15, 1990. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 32739 through 32740 inclusive, and Nos. 32874 through 33045 inclusive, noting voided warrants 32880 through 32888 inclusive, 32907, and 32951. Action: To approve demands and warrants as presented, and request that the City Attorney look into the re- quirement that the City pay an annual life insurance premium for Earl Diller, former City Manager of ten - 1 - 1 o years ago, and provide Council with a copy of the agree- ment requiring same. Motion Midstokke, second Creightdn. So ordered. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the February, 1990 financial reports: 1) Revenue and Expenditure Report; 2) City Treasurer's Report. (e) (f) Action: To receive and file the subject reports. Motion Wiemans, second Midstokke. So ordered. Recommendation to award bids for restoration of baseball/soccer field at Valley Park and tree trimming on the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt, Hermosa Avenue medians, and Gould Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and El Oeste. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated March 19, 1990. Action: To award the following bids and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract agreements for: 1) Restoration of the baseball/soccer field at Valley Park with Southern California Tree and Landscape in an amount not to exceed $27,225, which includes a 10% con- tingency ($22,300 was previously budgeted for this work); and approve the appropriation of an additional $4,925 from the Parks & Recreation Facility Tax Fund (CIP 89-506, Various Park Improvements); and 2) Tree trimming on the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt, Hermosa Avenue Median and Gould Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and El Oeste with Southern California Tree & Landscape in an amount not to exceed $4,840, which includes a 10% contingency. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. In response to concerns by Councilmember Sheldon con- cerning staff's expertise with regard to landscape main- tenance, Mayor Creighton directed that staff check into the infestation that seems to exist on current trees and. prepare a report for Council review at the next meeting. In response to concerns expressed by Councilmember Midstokke with regard to School District concurrence for the restoration work, Mayor Creighton directed that staff contact the Hermosa Beach School District (property owner of the land in question) to ensure the District's concurrence for the restoration work before proceeding with the project. Recommendation to receive and file report on charges to the Lighting and Crossing Guard Districts. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated March 21, 1990. (g) Action: To refer back to staff for additional informa- tion: 1) a breakdown between salaries and benefits, and 2) a list of employees charged to this salary account; with the interest being in the expended amount this year on the accounts rather than the budgeted amount. Motion Midstokke, second Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to receive and file report on current retention policy of tapes of City Council meetings. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated March 21, 1990. Action: To allow citizen to speak on this item. Motion Wiemans, second Essertier. So ordered. Addressing the Council on this item was: Howard Longacre, 1221 Seventh Place Action: To receive and file the subject report. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered, noting the objection of Wiemans. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - NONE 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items (b), (d), (e), (f), and (g) were discussed at this time but are listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC - NONE PUBLIC HEARINGS Action: To reverse the order of Public Hearing Items 5 and 6. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered, noting the ob- jection of Midstokke. 6. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROCEDURE FOR VARIOUS TYPES OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS A MEANS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY AND TO REQUIRE ENVIRONMEN- TAL ASSESSMENT OF SUCH PROJECTS, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION AND RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION. Memorandums from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 20, 1990, and from City Manager Kevin Northcraft dated March 22, 1990. Supplemental memorandum from Planning Direc- tor Michael Schubach dated March 27, 1990. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: June Williams, 2065 Manhattan Avenue Jerry Newton, 2041 Circle Drive Jim Lissner, 2715 El Oeste Wesley Newton, 2041 Circle Drive Wilma Burt, 1152 Seventh Street Edie Webber, 1201 Eleventh Street Howard Longacre, 1221 Seventh Place Wesley Bush, Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce Jerry Compton, 200 Pier Avenue, Suite 9 The public hearing was closed. Proposed Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 90-1026 as presented. Motion Essertier. Died for lack of a second. Proposed Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 90-1026 with the grandfather clause. Motion Midstokke. Died for lack of a second. Proposed Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 90-1026 excluding the grandfather clause. Motion Wiemans, second Essertier. Failed by the follow- ing roll call vote: AYES: Essertier, Wiemans NOES: Midstokke, Sheldon, Mayor Creighton Action: To stop questoning staff since all questions have been adequately answered. Motion Midstokke, second Wiemans. So ordered, noting the objections of Creighton and Sheldon. Action: To allow questions by citizen. Motion Wiemans, second Midstokke. So ordered. Addressing the Council on this item was: June Williams, 2065 Manhattan Avenue Proposed Action: To refer back to staff for report on accepting the precise development plan, but changing it to apply to three units or more, or remodels/additions, greater than 3,000 square feet, and to include the grandfather clause. Motion Sheldon, second Midstokke. Failed by the follow- ing roll call vote: AYES: Midstokke, Sheldon NOES: Essertier, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 90-1026, with the following amendments: page 1, Section 1431, add to end of sentence, "...in any zone except residential zones."; and page 4, add the grandfather clause as Section 3, and renumber subsequent sections accordingly. Motion Essertier, second Midstokke. Carried by the fol- lowing roll call vote: AYES: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon NOES: Wiemans, Mayor Creighton Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 90-1026, as amended, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS FOR ALL PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENTS, AND FOR ALL PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS OF TWO DWELLING UNITS OR GREATER, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. Carried by the fol- lowing roll call vote. AYES: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton NOES: None Further Action: To adopt Resolution No. 90-5351, enti- tled, "A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH THE PROCEDURAL RE- QUIREMENTS, TIME FRAMES, AND FEES FOR SUBMISSION OF PRE- CISE DEVELOPMENT PLANS." Motion Essertier, second Sheldon. So ordered, noting the objection of Mayor Creighton. The Meeting recessed at 10:10 P.M. The Meeting reconvened at 10:26 P.M. 5. PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE FROM C-3, R-1, R-2, R-3, R -P AND SPA -2 (MOSTLY C-3) TO A COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR FROM SOUTHERN CITY BOUNDARY TO EIGHTH STREET ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 19, 1990. Supplemental memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 27, 1990. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach, and Associate Planner Ken Robertson made a presentation with the use of an overhead projector. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Jerry Compton, 200 Pier Avenue, Suite 9 Howard Longacre, 1221 Seventh Place Mike Zenith, 705 Pacific Coast Highway (Mar Vista Motel) The Public Hearing was closed. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 90-1027, with the following amendments: 1) Section 9.67-6. Commercial Development Standards, B. Standards: page 4, line 14, add word "with" to read "...to proceed with building permit."; and lines 23 and 24, east of Pacific Coast Highway --change maximum height of second tier to 35 feet, west of Pacific Coast Highway --change maximum height of first tier to 30 feet and maximum height of second tier to 40 feet; 2) Section 9.67-6. Commercial Development Standards, C. Requirements: page 5, item 6, add to end of sentence, "except for Article 14"; and add the requirements, "All landscaped areas shall include an automatic sprinkler system." and "The landscape plan and irrigation system shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director; and 3) Section 9.67-6. Precise Development Plan, B. General Guidelines: page 6, item 2.c., line 11, delete "for existing mediocrity" and re- place with "to match existing buildings" to read "...prescription to match existing buildings, as...";and item 2.b., line 23, add the word "tall" to read "...flat tall vertical walls..." Motion Sheldon, second Essertier. Carried by the fol- lowing roll call vote: AYES: Essertier, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton NOES: Midstokke Final Action: Towaive full reading of Ordinance No. 90-1027, as amended, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO CREATE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 7, FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. Carried by the fol- lowing roll call vote: AYES: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton NOES: None 7. FINAL CIRCULATION, TRANSPORTATION, AND PARKING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN, WITH RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 20, 1990. Supplemental letter from David Suess dated March 26, 1990, and responding letter from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated March 27, 1990. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. There being no one com- ing forward to speak on this item, the Public Hearing was closed. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 90-5352, entitled, "A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE FINAL CIRCULATION, TRANSPORTA- TION, AND PARKING ELEMENT REPORT DATED MARCH, 1990, AND TO HAVE AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, with the following amendments to the document: 1) page 45, item 5, delete reference to traffic speed greater than 45 miles per hour; 2) page 45, item 5A, delete reference to bus shelters; 3) page 45, item 5C, delete reference to leasing benches and/or bus shelters and all references to bus shelters; 4) page 48, under second paragraph, delete "Highly visible advertisements," and change sen- tence to read "Advertisements at major entrances to the City will be considered by the City Council."; and 5) page 51, second paragraph from bottom, Option Two, and page 52, first paragraph, delete all references to a separate bike path on the beach. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered, noting the objection of Sheldon. 1 Councilmember Midstokke also requested immediate Council consideration of the recommendation on page 60, under Zoning Code, regarding restaurant parking requirements. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. RECOMMENDATION RE. REPORT ON PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated March. 5, 1990. (Continued from March 13, 1990 meeting.) A staff report was presented by Acting Director Staten. Addressing the Council on this item was: Melissa Crosley, 210 S. Catalina, Redondo Beach Wilma Burt, 1152 Seventh Street Howard Longacre, 1221 Seventh Place Betty Martin, 252 Twenty-seventh Street Proposed Action: To table the public information pro- gram and the appropriation of funds, to have the new General Services Director review the entire program when he or she is comfortable with the City (after a couple months of being hired), and also to look at the public relations side of the program --the "citizen as customer" --in conjunction with the overall City goal just adopted for all departments regarding all City programs. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. Proposed Action: To amend the above motion to postpone the details of the program and the allocation of funds, but to institute the new policies and procedures. Motion Sheldon. Amendment not accepted by Midstokke. Action: Substitute motion to accept the new policies and procedures with the following modifications: 1) Change Item A.1. to read "Officers are permitted, with respect to non -public -safety violations, to dismiss their own citations..."; delete Item A.1.d. entirely; and table all expenditures pending review by the new General Services Director as suggested in the original motion. Motion Essertier, second Sheldon. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Essertier, Sheldon, Wiemans NOES: Midstokke, Mayor Creighton 9. REVIEW OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS FOR ENTRY SIGNS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 27, 1990. (Continued from March 13, 1990 meeting.) A staff report was presented by Community Resources Director Rooney. Proposed Action: To not proceed with the entry signs. Motion Creighton, second Midstokke. Failed with the objections of Essertier, Sheldon, Wiemans. Proposed Action: To receive and file, with no change in direction, thereby allowing the project to go forward. Motion Sheldon, second Essertier. Failed with the ob- jections of Creighton, Midstokke, Wiemans. Action: To not proceed with the entryway signs. Motion Midstokke, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the objections of Essertier and Wiemans. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - NONE 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL - NONE 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - NONE CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Howard Longacre, 1221 Seventh Place, submitted Daily Breeze article dated 3/16/90 re Hermosa Hotel Jim Lissner, 2715 El Oeste Wilma Burt, 1152 Seventh Street Fred Linden, 812 Gardenia Way, Corona del Mar, rep- resenting company developing Manhattan Grande Plaza ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, March 28, 1990, at the hour of 12:51 A.M. to a Closed Session to be held on Tuesday, April 10, 1990, at the hour of 7:00 P.M., followed by a Regular Meeting at the hour of 7:30 P.M. City Clerk 8 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, March 27, 1990, at the hour of 7:50 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - held pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding Real Estate Negotiations: South School and Prospect Heights surplus lots, with the Hermosa Beach School District, at the hour of 7:04 P.M., adjourning at 7:43 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - June Williams ROLL CALL: Present: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton Absent: None PRESENTATION OF DONATION FOR HOLIDAY TREE LOT FROM HERMOSA BEACH RIWANIS CLUB Frank Paulstein, business owner, 200 Pier Avenue, pres- ented the donation on behalf of the Kiwanis Club Founda- tion to the Community Center Foundation. Community Resources Director Mary Rooney accepted the donation. CITIZEN COMMENTS Howard Longacre, 1221 Seventh Place 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (g) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (b) Midstokke, (d) Wiemans, (e) Sheldon, (f) Midstokke, and (g) Wiemans. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. (a) (b) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on March 13, 1990; 2) Special meeting of the City Council held on March 15, 1990. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 32739 through 32740 inclusive, and Nos. 32874 through 33045 inclusive, noting voided warrants 32880 through 32888 inclusive, 32907, and 32951. Action: To approve demands and warrants as presented, and request that the City Attorney look into the re- quirement that the City pay an annual life insurance premium for Earl Diller, former City Manager of ten -1- 1a1) years ago, and provide Council with a copy of the agree- ment requiring same. Motion Midstokke, second Creighton. So ordered. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the February, 1990 financial reports: 1) Revenue and Expenditure Report; 2) City Treasurer's Report. (e) (f) Action: To receive and file the subject reports. Motion Wiemans, second Midstokke. So ordered. Recommendation to award bids for restoration of baseball/soccer field at Valley Park and tree trimming on the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt, Hermosa Avenue medians, and Gould Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and El Oeste. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated March 19, 1990. Action: To award the following bids and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract agreements for: 1) Restoration of the baseball/soccer field at Valley Park with Southern California Tree and Landscape in an amount not to exceed $27,225, which includes a 10% con- tingency ($22,300 was previously budgeted for this work); and approve the appropriation of an additional $4,925 from the Parks & Recreation Facility Tax Fund (CIP 89-506, Various Park Improvements); and 2) Tree trimming on the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt, Hermosa Avenue Median and Gould Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and El Oeste with Southern California Tree & Landscape in an amount not to exceed $4,840, which includes a 10% contingency. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. In response to concerns by Councilmember Sheldon con- cerning staff's expertise with regard to landscape main- tenance, Mayor Creighton directed that staff check into the infestation that seems to exist on current trees and prepare a report for Council review at the next meeting. In response to concerns expressed by Councilmember Midstokke with regard to School District concurrence for the restoration work, Mayor Creighton directed that staff contact the Hermosa Beach School District (property owner of the land in question) to ensure the District's concurrence for the restoration work before proceeding with the project. Recommendation to receive and file report on charges to the Lighting and Crossing Guard Districts. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated March 21, 1990. 2 (g) Action: To refer back to staff for additional informa- tion: 1) a breakdown between salaries and benefits, and 2) a list of employees charged to this salary account; with the interest being in the expended amount this year on the accounts rather than the budgeted amount. Motion Midstokke, second Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to receive and file report on current retention policy of tapes of City Council meetings. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated March 21, 1990. Action: To allow citizen to speak on this item. Motion Wiemans, second Essertier. So ordered. Addressing the Council on this item was: Howard Longacre, 1221 Seventh Place Action: To receive and file the subject report. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered, noting the objection of Wiemans. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - NONE 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items (b), (d), (e), (f), and (g) were discussed at this time but are listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC - NONE PUBLIC HEARINGS Action: To reverse the order of Public Hearing Items 5 and 6. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered, noting the ob- jection of Midstokke. 6. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROCEDURE FOR VARIOUS TYPES OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS A MEANS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY AND TO REQUIRE ENVIRONMEN- TAL ASSESSMENT OF SUCH PROJECTS, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION AND RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION. Memorandums from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 20, 1990, and from City Manager Kevin Northcraft dated March 22, 1990. Supplemental memorandum from Planning Direc- tor Michael Schubach dated March 27, 1990. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: June Williams, 2065 Manhattan Avenue Jerry Newton, 2041 Circle Drive Jim Lissner, 2715 El Oeste Wesley Newton, 2041 Circle Drive Wilma Burt, 1152 Seventh Street Edie Webber, 1201 Eleventh Street Howard Longacre, 1221 Seventh Place Wesley Bush, Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce Jerry Compton, 200 Pier Avenue, Suite 9 The public hearing was closed. Proposed Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 90-1026 as presented. Motion Essertier. Died for lack of a second. Proposed Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 90-1026 with the grandfather clause. Motion Midstokke. Died for lack of a second. Proposed Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 90-1026 excluding the grandfather clause. Motion Wiemans, second Essertier. Failed by the follow- ing roll call vote: AYES: Essertier, Wiemans NOES: Midstokke, Sheldon, Mayor Creighton Action: To stop questoning staff since all questions have been adequately answered. Motion Midstokke, second Wiemans. So ordered, noting the objections of Creighton and Sheldon. Action: To allow questions by citizen. Motion Wiemans, second Midstokke. So ordered. Addressing the Council on this item was: June Williams, 2065 Manhattan Avenue Proposed Action: To refer back to staff for report on accepting the precise development plan, but changing it to apply to three units or more, or remodels/additions, greater than 3,000 square feet, and to include the grandfather clause. Motion Sheldon, second Midstokke. Failed by the follow- ing roll call vote: AYES: Midstokke, Sheldon NOES: Essertier, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 90-1026, with the following amendments: page 1, Section 1431, add to end of sentence, "...in any zone except residential zones."; and page 4, add the grandfather clause as Section 3, and renumber subsequent sections accordingly. Motion Essertier, second Midstokke. Carried by the fol- lowing roll call vote: AYES: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon NOES: Wiemans, Mayor Creighton Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 90-1026, as amended, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS FOR ALL PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENTS, AND FOR ALL PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS OF TWO DWELLING UNITS OR GREATER, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. Carried by the fol- lowing roll call vote. AYES: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton NOES: None Further Action: To adopt Resolution No. 90-5351, enti- tled, IIA RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH THE PROCEDURAL RE- QUIREMENTS, TIME FRAMES, AND FEES FOR SUBMISSION OF PRE- CISE DEVELOPMENT PLANE." Motion Essertier, second Sheldon. ,So ordered, noting the objection of Mayor Creighton. The Meeting recessed at 10:10 P.M. The Meeting reconvened at 10:26 P.M. 5. PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE FROM C-3, R-1, R-2, R-3, R -P AND SPA -2 (MOSTLY C-3) TO A COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR FROM SOUTHERN CITY BOUNDARY TO EIGHTH STREET ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 19, 1990. Supplemental memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 27, 1990. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach, and Associate Planner Ken Robertson made a presentation with the use of an overhead projector. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Jerry Compton, 200 Pier Avenue, Suite 9 Howard Longacre, 1221 Seventh Place Mike Zenith, 705 Pacific Coast Highway (Mar Vista Motel) The Public Hearing was closed. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 90-1027, with the following amendments: 1) Section 9.67-6. Commercial Development Standards, B. Standards: page 4, line 14, add word "with" to read "...to proceed with building permit."; and lines 23 and 24, east of Pacific Coast Highway --change maximum height of second tier to 35 feet, west of Pacific Coast Highway --change maximum height of first tier to 30 feet and maximum height of second tier to 40 feet; 2) Section 9.67-6.. Commercial Development Standards, C. Requirements: page 5, item 6, add to end of sentence, "except for Article 14"; and add 5 the requirements, "All landscaped areas shall include an automatic sprinkler system." and "The landscape plan and irrigation system shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director; and 3) Section 9.67-6. Precise Development Plan, B. General Guidelines: page 6, item 2.c., line 11, delete "for existing mediocrity" and re- place with "to match existing buildings" to read "...prescription to match existing buildings, as...";and item 2.b., line 23, add the word "tall" to read "...flat tall vertical walls..." Motion Sheldon, second Essertier. Carried by the fol- lowing roll call vote: AYES: Essertier, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton NOES: Midstokke Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 90-1027, as amended, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO CREATE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 7, FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Creighton, second Sheldon. Carried by the fol- lowing roll call vote: AYES: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton NOES: None 7. FINAL CIRCULATION, TRANSPORTATION, AND PARKING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN, WITH RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 20, 1990. Supplemental letter from David Suess dated March 26, 1990, and responding letter from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated March 27, 1990. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. There being no one com- ing forward to speak on this item, the Public Hearing was closed. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 90-5352, entitled, HA_ RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE FINAL CIRCULATION, TRANSPORTA- TION, AND PARKING ELEMENT REPORT DATED MARCH, 1990, AND TO HAVE AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, with the following amendments to the document: 1) page 45, item 5, delete reference to traffic speed greater than 45 miles per hour; 2) page 45, item 5A, delete reference to bus shelters; 3) page 45, item 5C, delete reference to leasing benches and/or bus shelters and all references to bus shelters; 4) page 48, under second paragraph, delete "Highly visible advertisements," and change sen- tence to read "Advertisements at major entrances to the City will be considered by the City Council."; and 5) page 51, second paragraph from bottom, Option Two, and page 52, first paragraph, delete all references to a separate bike path on the beach. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered, noting the objection of Sheldon. Councilmember Midstokke also requested immediate Council consideration of the recommendation on page 60, under Zoning Code, regarding restaurant parking requirements. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. RECOMMENDATION RE. REPORT ON PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated March 5, 1990. (Continued from March 13, 1990 meeting.) A staff report was presented by Acting Director Staten. Addressing the Council on this item was: Melissa Crosley, 210 S. Catalina, Redondo Beach Wilma Burt, 1152 Seventh Street Howard Longacre, 1221 Seventh Place Betty Martin, 252 Twenty-seventh Street Proposed Action: To table the public information pro- gram and the appropriation of funds, to have the new General Services Director review the entire program when he or she is comfortable with the City (after a couple months of being hired), and also to look at the public relations side of the program --the "citizen as customer" --in conjunction with the overall City goal just adopted for all departments regarding all City programs. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. Proposed Action: To amend the above motion to postpone the details of the program and the allocation of funds, but to institute the new policies and procedures. Motion Sheldon. Amendment not accepted by Midstokke. Action: Substitute motion to accept the new policies and procedures with the following modifications: 1) Change Item A.1. to read "Officers are permitted, with respect to non -public -safety violations, to dismiss their own citations..."; delete Item A.l.d.. entirely; and table all expenditures pending review by the new General Services Director as suggested in the original motion. Motion Essertier, second Sheldon. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Essertier, Sheldon, Wiemans NOES: Midstokke, Mayor Creighton 9. REVIEW OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS FOR ENTRY SIGNS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated February 27, 1990. (Continued from March 13, 1990 meeting.) A staff report was presented by Community Resources Director Rooney. Proposed Action: To not proceed with the entry signs. Motion Creighton, second Midstokke. Failed with the objections of Essertier, Sheldon, Wiemans. Proposed Action: To receive and file, with no change in direction, thereby allowing the project to go forward. Motion Sheldon, second Essertier. Failed with the ob- jections of Creighton, Midstokke, Wiemans. Action: To not proceed with the entryway signs. Motion Midstokke, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the objections of Essertier and Wiemans. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - NONE 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL - NONE 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - NONE CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Howard Longacre, 1221 Seventh Place, submitted Daily Breeze article dated 3/16/90 re Hermosa Hotel Jim Lissner, 2715 El Oeste Wilma Burt, 1152 Seventh Street Fred Linden, 812 Gardenia Way, Corona del Mar, rep- resenting company developing Manhattan Grande Plaza ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, March 28, 1990, at the hour of 12:51 A.M. to a Closed Session to be held on Tuesday, April 10, 1990, at the hour of 7:00 P.M., followed by a Regular Meeting at the hour of 7:30 P.M. City Clerk April 2, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 24, 1990 APPROVAL OF SPECIFICATIONS FOR CIP 89-518 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT FOR VALLEY PARR Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Approve specifications for CIP 89-518, Playground Equipment and authorize staff to advertise for bids on this project. 2. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary. Background: At the meeting of May 24, 1988, City Council approved an appropriation of $7,000 for a consultant to reconcile outstanding recreation grants. On January 10, 1989, a report was presented to City Council indicating that additional funds were due to the City from the State for park recreation equipment. The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission has recommended that monies from the outstanding recreation grants be used for purchase of playground equipment at Valley Park. On September 12, 1989, the City Council appropriated the. remaining state recreational grant funds from Grant No. 80-19019 for the following Capital Improvement Project: CIP 89-518 Recreational Facilities $12,305 These funds need to be committed at this time in order to meet the state deadline for the above grant funds. Analysis: All of the funds for CIP 89-518 are designated for a large modular playground equipment system at Valley Park. The use of the grant funds has been reviewed with the State Department of Parks and Recreation in Sacramento and has received their approval. Specifications have been prepared by the City Public Works Department staff. The contract documents are - 1 - lj se available for review in the office of the City Clerk and are ready to go out for bid. Funding: The project is funded by the State Parks and Recreation Grants as shown below: CIP 89-518 State Grant No. Amount Available 80-19019 $ 12,305 If additional funds are required for the playground equipment, they will be requested from the park fund after the bids have been received. Alternatives: Alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Modify the scope of work. 2. Cancel the project and return the grant funds to the state. Respectfully Submitted, Brian Gengler Assistant Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Cope 'and Director of Finance ty/aospe Concur: Lynn A. Terry P.E. Depu y City Engineer Anthony Antich Director of Public Works Mary Direc or of Community Resources City Manager V I(evin B. North -raft City Managers Comment: This is for a modular play assembly per attachment "A". Cu (Oi,./6 Vot,ur C ehuuL 1110e Cv 12,14.5 Ruta Cu AA ISS R-unlg 0"N ts La.TC. 1 d w SUS. lar.i C Tait. f 1 I "Nu Bt.& Su Q& 57rcau-sS si . W«.1. S �5 / L%JCG (95F.r:% Sn,i WI t4 v4 0 CZs'i L . "ITEM A" MODULAR PLAY SYSTEM PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT ATTACHMENT A (v�WMlE-$UOE 5-0 8,1#2.3 v+�+GA.Aso,o s 11,04 wl mAro R.or«. Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 12, 1990 Regular Meeting of April 24, 1990 HIGHLAND AVENUE WIDENING, CIP 85-102 ACCEPT CONSTRUCTION WORK AS COMPLETE Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Accept as complete the construction of Highland Avenue Widening project, CIP 85-102 2. Accept as an estimate, the cost of construction surveying, inspection and material testing services provided by Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. 3. Authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Completion. 4. Authorize staff to: a) Release the retention payment to Excel Paving Company. b) Release Excel Paving Company from the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Materials Bond. c) Decrease the Street Lighting Fund amount from $ 33,775 to $ 18,222. Decrease the Gas Tax Fund amount from $ 29,459 - to $ -0-. Increase the Sewer Fund amount from $ 14,290 to $ 22,776. Increase the FAU Fund amount from $ 110,527 to $ 116,061. Background: On March 14, 1989, City Council awarded a contract in the amount of $122,357.58 to Excel Paving Company for the widening of Highland Avenue. This project was to provide one traffic lane and one parking lane in each direction between Homer Street and Longfellow Avenue. The work included a new sewer line, sidewalks,curbs, gutters, street lights and asphalt pavement. - 1 - lk Analysis: This section is divided as follows: 1. Construction A. B. C. D. E. F. G. Built According to Plans and Specifications Time Schedule Notice of Completion Release of Bonds Construction Costs County Costs City Costs 2. Fiscal Impact and Project Accounting A. B. C. Total Project Costs Total Project Funding FY 89-90 Project Status 1. Construction A. Built According to Plans and Specifications The Engineering staff recommends acceptance of the work as complete. The project has been built according to the plans and specifications originally prepared by Barrett Consulting Group as modified in accordance with plan revisions and change orders issued by the City Engineering staff. B. Time Schedule Below is a summary of the project time schedule: Start Date Contract Time Original Contract Completion Days Added by Change Orders Adjusted Contract Completion Actual Completion Date September 18, 1989 60 working days Date December 14, 1989 8 working days . Date December 27, 1989 December 19, 1989 The project was completed within C. Notice of Completion the adjusted time schedule. Staff recommends that a Notice of Completion be approved by the City Council and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. D. Release of Bonds Pending City Council authorization; after the Notice of Completion is recorded, staff will release Excel Paving Company from the obligation of the following bonds: Faithful Performance Bond Bonding Company Original Bond Amount Amount to be Released Bond No. Labor and Materials Bond Bonding Company Original Bond Amount Amount to be Released Bond No. Federal Insurance Company $122,357.58 $122,357.58 8116-46-42 Federal Insurance Company $122,357.58 $122,357.58 8116-46-42 Also pending Council approval; the retention payment, in the amount of $ 13,605.93, will be released to Excel Paving Company thirty (30) days after recordation of the Notice of Completion (provided no stop notices or mechanics liens are received within that time period). E. Construction Costs Below is a summary of construction costs for the project: Original Contract Amount Quantity Adjustments Change Orders (10 total) $122,357.58 12,578.28 1,123.42 Final Construction Cost $136,059.28 See Attachment "A" for more detailed information on change order costs. F. County Costs Construction control surveying, inspection and materials testing on this project were performed by the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. The County inspector has identified all items which required correction and has provided written certification that all items have been corrected. Below is a summary of the estimated County costs to be adjusted after all statements from the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works have been received. The staff was informed that the final invoices would not be available from the County until May. Surveying Inspection Materials Testing Budgeted Estimated Costs $ 5,000 $ 9,637..65 8,000 19,000.00(est.) 3,000 2,000.00(est.) Total County Costs $ 16,000 $ 30,637.65(est.) - 3 - G. City Costs The City will pursue FAU grant reimbursement for administration and design time spent by the City engineering staff on the project.(To be finaled after all costs are in). At the present time, all City engineering costs are charged to the City's general fund and Public Works budget with no reimbursement. 2. Fiscal Impact and Project Accounting. A. Total Project Costs Below is a summary of project costs separated into design, construction and construction engineering; divided by fiscal year. Year FY FY FY 87-88 88-89 89-90 Design $ 7,601.36 3,695.98 -0- Construction $ -0- -0- 136,059.28 Construction Engineering Totals $ -0- $ 7,601.36 9,637.65 13,333.63 21,000.00(est) 157,059.28(est) $11,297.34 $136,059.28 $30,637.65(est) $177,994.27(est) Design Construction Const. Engineering Amount $ 11,297 136,059 30,638(est) % of Total Project Cost 6.35% 76.44% 17.21% $ 177,994(est) 100.00% B. Total Project Funding The project is funded by the sources listed below. The Federal Aid Urban (FAU) grant reimbursement funds are paid through the State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and can be up to a maximum of 86.44% of the total cost. Funding Source Street Lighting FAU Fund Sewer Fund Gas Tax Fund Design Construction $ 2,000 $ 18,222 3,696 95,061 3,000 22,776 2,601 -0- $ 11,297 $ 136,059 Construction Engineering Totals $ -0- 30,638(est) -0- -0- $ 20,222 129,395(est) 25,776 2,601 $ 30,638(est) $ 177,994(est) C. FY 89-90 Project Status Total Funds Budgeted FY 89-90 $ 188,051 Estimated Funds to be Spent 157,059(est) Estimated Tax Dollars Not Spent $ 30,992(est) Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Do not accept construction as complete. Respectfully Submitted, Lynn A. Terry, P.E. Deputy City Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance Attachement ty/cwc Concur: Anth1J ''ntich Director of Pukilic Works City Manager CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY CIP 85-102, HIGHLAND AVENUE WIDENING Change Change in Order Working Change in No. Description of Change Days. Cost 1 2 Delete one street light and install poles on the east side of the street. 0 $ ( 5,120.00) Revise sanitary sewer house service lateral and install clean out. 1 1,250.00 3 Remove existing palm trees. 0 ( 600.00) 4 Delete all aggregate base under sidewalk, curb and gutter. 0 (1,500.00) 5 Contractor's standby time due to street profile design changes. 5 1,656.00 6 Curb and gutter elevation design change to improve drainage. 0 -0- 7 Regrading for curb and gutter due to design elevation changes. 1 1,825.00 8 Cold plane existing highpoint from station, 4+00 to 5+00. 1 750.00 9 Revise traffic pavement mark- ings. Delete reinstalling of street traffic signs. 0 -0- 10 Revise electric wiring, pole type and service points. Total: pwclerk/cwca ATTACHMENT "A" 0 2,862.42 8 days $1,123.42 (s16.66H EXPENDITURES PROJECT ELEMENTS EXPENDED PRIOR TO FY89-90 CIP 85-102 WIDEN HIGHLAND AVENUE ESTIMATED ESTIMATED BUDGET EXPENDED BALANCE FY89-90 6/30/90 6/30/90 BUDGET FY90-91 ESTIMATED FUTURE BUDGET NEEDS FY91-92 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS, SPECS & ESTIMATES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS 0 11,297 0 149,456 136,059 13,397 9,638 21,500 21,000 500 0 SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY TOTAL EXPENDITURE 20,935 170,956 157,059 13,897 17,095 0 17,095 $20,935 $188,051 $157,059 $30,992 SO SO 50 SO SO ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL 11,297 136,059 30,638 177,994 0 5177,994 FUNDING SOURCES 105 STREET LIGHTING FUND 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 150 GRANT Federal Aid Urban 160 SEWER FUND 2,000 33,775 18,222 15,553 2,601 29,459 0 29,459 13,334 110,527 116,061 (5,534) 3,000 14,290 22,776 (8,486) TOTAL FUNDING TOTAL UNFUNDED $20,935 $188,051 $157,059 530,992 SO SO SO 20,222 2,601 129,395 25,776 $177,994 April 16, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 24, 1990 ACCEPT WORK PERFORMED BY MOFFATT & NICHOL FOR PIER REPAIRS, CIP 88-614 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Accept the work performed by Moffat & Nichol Engineers, Inc. pertaining to the pier repairs, and 2. authorize staff to release the payments to Moffatt & Nichol Engineers, Inc. Background: On August 23, 1988, City Council awarded a contract to Moffatt & Nichol Engineers, Inc. for the preliminary engineering on the pier in order to determine the extent of the damages from the January 1988 storm. The fee for this service was not to exceed $17,500. On November 22, 1988, City Council awarded a contract to Moffatt & Nichol Engineers, Inc. for final design of the repairs to the municipal pier not to exceed $14,000. On March 28, 1989, City Council awarded a contract to Moffatt & Nichol Engineers, Inc. for construction contract administration and inspection services not to exceed $30,340. Analysis: This section is divided as follows: 1. Preliminary Engineering 2. Final Engineering 3. Construction Administration 4. Construction Inspection 1. Preliminary Engineering During January, 1988, the municipal pier was hit by extremely high storm waves and sustained damage to the most seaward row of piles and the concrete beam connecting the piles. Moffatt and Nichol Engineers was hired by the City to assess the original damage and prepare a report on their findings. This report was then used by the City in applying for Federal and State disaster assistance funds. The major portion of the funds for this report have been paid by the City to the consultant. - 1 - 11 Contract amount Payments made to date Balance due consultant $17,500 16,10\2 $ 1,398 2. Final Engineering Moffatt & Nichol Engineers, Inc. submitted their final design plans to the City for the repair of the pier. The repair work was based on limited observation of the existing damage. After the construction contractor had his working platforms in place, close inspection of the pile cap showed additional damage which required major change orders. Contract amount $14,000 Payments made to date -0- Balance due consultant $14,000 3. Construction Administration Moffatt & Nichol Engineers, Inc. proposed to the City that they would provide construction administration services to the City during construction which were to include the following: a) shop drawing review b) recommendations on contractor's payment requests c) recommendations on construction change requests d) attendance at the pre -construction meeting e) answer questions during construction f) provide a final on-site review The construction administration time to be provided by the project manager who works for Moffatt & Nichol Engineers, Inc. was approved by the City not to exceed a cost of $3,280 during the 45 calendar day construction period. The actual construction administration time spent by the project manager, based on billings from Moffatt & Nichol. Engineers, Inc., as per their invoice statements was as follows: April, 1989 May, 1989 June, 1989 July, 1989 less 6 hours 5 hours 21 hours 11 hours 43 hours 3 hours (over contract) 40 hours at $82/hour = $3,280 On June 16, 1989, the contractor requested guidance and a recommendation from the project manager on how to proceed due to unforeseen corrective construction that needed to be resolved. Work did not continue until August 2, 1989. This action took place after the City engineering staff demanded a meeting and that the project manager from Moffatt & Nichol Engineers provide direction to the contractor. The City engineering staff approved a change order to the contractor for 48 days of additional contract time due to no fault of his. The contractor requested $5,124 for standby time during this period, which the project manager (Moffatt & Nichol's) recommended that the City pay. The City engineering staff disagreed and denied the recommendation from the project manager. Staff's opinion was that if anyone should pay for the standby time, it should be the project manager. Between June 16, 1989, and August 24, 1989, the project manager from Moffatt & Nichol Engineers recommended eight (8) change orders for a total of $96,081. The City engineering staff reduced this amount and only approved $33,686 for these same eight change orders. See the attached summary of change order costs recommended by the consultant and the approved change order costs negotiated by the City staff. For additional back up information and correspondence between the City and Moffatt & Nichol Engineers, Inc. see copies of letters and documents available in the City Clerk's office dated as follows: 1. July 13, 1989 - Letter from City to Moffatt & Nichol 2. July 17, 1989 - Memo from Moffatt & Nichol to City 3. July 18, 1989 - Letter from City to Moffatt & Nichol 4. July 27, 1989 - Staff memo to City Council 5. August 4, 1989 - Letter from City to Moffatt & Nichol 6. August 17, 1989 - Letter from Moffatt & Nichol to City 7. August 31, 1989 - Letter from City to Moffatt & Nichol 8. September 13, 1989 - Letter from Moffatt & Nichol to City 9. September 14, 1989 - Letter from City to Moffatt & Nichol 10. September 14, 1989 - Letter from Mofatt & Nichol to City The cost to the project for construction administration time by City engineering staff was $1,905 in salaries, covering 91 hours. This force account cost was fully eligible under the Federal F.E.M.A. guidelines. It appears that the amount will be 97% reimbursable under the three (3) grants that the City is eligible for from Federal and State disaster assistance funding. 4. Construction Inspection Moffatt & Nichol Engineers, Inc. proposed to the City that they would provide management and on-site observation of the construction as desired by the City including underwater diving. The on-site observers were to be employees of Marine Construction Consultants for the above water construction and employees of American Divers for the underwater construction. These two companies were subcontractors to Moffatt & Nichol Engineers. The not to exceed costs and actual costs for construction inspection are shown below: Inspection Company Marine Construction Consultants American Divers Moffatt & Nichol Engineers (10% management fee) City of Hermosa Beach Total - 3 - Cost Not Actual to Exceed Cost $15,600 $14,700 9,000 7,500 2,460 2,460 620 $27,060 $25,040 By the end of July, 1989, it was apparent to the City staff that there was some major concerns about the\level of service being provided by Moffatt & Nichol Engineers in regard to construction inspection. Although 60% of the inspection funds were spent, the pile cap under the pier had not yet even moved one inch back toward its original position. See referenced City letter dated August 4, 1989. Additional City concerns were also stated in the City letter dated August 31, 1989. City staff was operating with the belief that, under, the agreement with Moffatt & Nichol Engineers, the project manager was providing full and complete construction management on behalf of the City, including control over the on-site inspection. After receiving the daily inspection reports provided by Moffatt & Nichol Engineers, it appeared that there was no control whatsoever over the inspection by the project manager. The on-site inspection subcontractor was not charging his time in a judicious manner. The City was charged $600 for a full day of inspection, every day, even if the actual work took only a small part of the day. According to the field inspection logs, August 10, 1989, was the last day that actual above -water construction work was inspected by Moffatt & Nichol inspection personnel. When the City engineering staff became aware that inspection was not being provided, the City was forced to remove City personnel from other duties to provide the necessary inspection. On August 28, 1989, the City began to monitor the above -water construction operations. Moffatt & Nichol Engineers were notified of this change in the City's letter of August 31, 1989. City Building Department inspection staff took over the day to day inspection duties until construction was completed. On September 25, 1989, the City engineering staff conducted the project final inspection. The cost to the City for the inspection by City forces under force account during that last three weeks was $620 in salaries. This amount is eligible for 97% reimbursement. Fiscal Impact: Moffatt & Nichol Consultant Engineers Approved Actual Contract Consultant Amount Cost Contract No. 1 Preliminary Engineering $17,500 Contract No. 2 Final Engineering 14,000 Contract No. 3 Construction Inspection 27,060 Construction Management 3,280 Total $61,840 Less previously paid amount Amount due consultant Less reimbursable amount City portion $17,500 14,000 24,420 3,280 $59,200 16,102 $43,098 40,377 $ 2,721 Based on the final F.E.M.A. inspection on April'2, 1990, it appears that 94% of the consultant's costs for engineering are reimbursable and 97% of the construction costs are reimbursable. The City engineering staff is pursuing and applying for the Federal and State disaster relief funds at this time. Alternatives: Alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Refuse to pay the amounts due because of poor service. This option has great emotional appeal. However, then these amounts could not be included in the disaster relief funds from the Federal and State agencies. This option could result in litigation problems and costs far in excess of paying the submitted invoices. 2. Deduct the amount that the City had to pay out in force account costs. These costs are for the City Engineering and Building Department staff time to finish the construction inspection. This option also has potential problems in excess of the amounts involved. Force account amount ($1,905 + $620) Less reimbursable amount City's final portion (3%) Respectfully submit ynn A. Terry, P.E. Deputy City Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Copeland iki Finance Director Attachments pier/pwclerk $2,525 2,449 $ 76 Conc r: 1011 ' _ A ony Antich Director of Public Works Kevin B. Nort'craft City Manager NEGOTIATED CHANGES IN CHANGE ORDERS MUNICIPAL PIER REPAIRS CIP 89-614 Change Order #1 Install temporary safety shims 7-17-89 between deck and pile cap. 7-26-89 Change Order #2 Remove underwater obstructions 7-17-89 from around the piles before 7-26-89 jacking the piles back into the original position. Change Order #3 Adjustment of time due to review of additional repair work by engineering design consultant. Change Order #4 Epoxy repair of cracks in the top 6 feet of six piles. Change Order #5 Epoxy coating on the outside of the pile cap to seal small hairline cracks. Change Order #6 Epoxy injection of cracks in the pile cap to restore the struc- tural integrity of the concrete beam. Change Order #7 Repair of the grout pad between the bottom of the deck slab and the top of the pile cap. 6,500 (M.& N.) 2,000 (City Staff) 4,000 (M.& N.) 2,100 (City Staff) 7-15-89 $ 5,124 (M.& N.) 7-31-89 $ -0- (City Staff) 6-16-89 7-26-89 8-24-89 $ 5,956 (M.& N.) $ 5,956 (City Staff) $ 5,183 (City Staff) 8-08-89 $ 4,724 (M.& N.) 8-24-89 $ 4,724 (City Staff) 6-16-89 $ 28,049 (M.& N.) 7-26-89 $ 8-08-89 $ 8-24-89 $ 6-16-89 7-26-89 8-08-89 8-17-89 8-24-89 28,049 13,711 11,403 (City Staff) (M.& N.) (City Staff) $ 36,284 (M.& N.) $ 4,977 (City Staff) $ 15,323 (M.& N.) $ 9,926 (M.& N.) $ -0- (City Staff) NOTE: Change order costs as negotiated by either (Moffatt & Nichol) or (City Staff). Attachment (1 of 2) I. Change Order #8 Repair of spalled area on the top 8 feet of pile NB. Change Order #9 Epoxy injection of additional cracks found underwater below the sand line. Change Order #10 Repair of 16 additional cracks in pile cap. Change Order #11 Repair of 28 bolt holes in con- crete deck. Change Order #12 6-16-89 7-26-89 8-08-89 8-21-89 8-24-89. 8-21-89 8-24-89 $ 15,291 (M.& N.) $ 5,000 (City Staff) $ 12,887 (M.& N.) $ 8,451 (City Staff) $ 8,276 (City Staff) - 07 (City Staff) - 0- (City Staff) 9-18-89 $ 4,800 (City Staff) 9-21-89 $ 700 (City Staff) Time adjustment for city activi- 9-25-89 ties. 6-16-89 7-17-89 7-26-89 8-8-89 8-17-89 8-24-89 9-18-89 9-21-89 SUMMARY OF NEGOTIATED CHANGES IN CHANGE ORDER TOTAL COSTS $ 85,581 $ 96,081 $ 48,105 $ 56,698 $ 43,612 $ 33,686 $ 38,486 $ 39,186 - 0- (City Staff) (M.& N.) (M.& N.) (City Staff) (M.& N.) (M.& N.) (City Staff) (City Staff) (City Staff) NOTE: Change order costs as negotiated by either (Moffatt & Nichol) or (City Staff) Attachment (2 of 2) April 12, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 24, 1990 OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT APPLICATION REQUEST Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council -approve the attached memorandum proposal (on behalf of the City of Hermosa Beach) to the Office of Traffic Safety in order to obtain grant funding for a project to identify high accident locations and to study neighborhood traffic intrusion. Background Approximately 18 months ago the City of Hermosa Beach had the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) conduct an evaluation of the Traffic Safety and Enforcement operations in the City. The results were very positive with respect to the engineering work effort in relation to the manpower availability and budget constraints. There were areas where the review team recommended additional study. One of these was the identification of high accident locations and development of citywide accident rates. The City requested grant funding for a project to accomplish the objectives stated by the OTS review team in 1989. However, the City did not qualify for funding at that time. At this time the City Public Works Department is again interested in requesting consideration for grant funding. Analysis The proposed project proposal is attached for review. In brief, the City would develop and distribute a work plan to perform the following tasks. - Develop a high accident location and identification program which would include frequencyof occurrence, severity and rate of occurrence as its main components. - Provide traffic engineering services to assist and instruct City staff in the basic engineering concepts to maintain the program. - Conduct studies of two representative neighborhoods within Hermosa Beach where they are experiencing traffic intrusion due to the high traffic volumes from the major arterials, such as Pacific Coast Highway. r Fiscal Impact None in that all work can be done with City forces and/or contracted to private consultants. OTSIto fund the project costs to an amount estimated at $40,500 if funded. Respectfully submitted, 1 Adak' ' i4 Ant ony Antich, 'ir ctor Public Works De•artment ti Concur: 'Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager MEMORANDUM PROPOSAL HIGH ACCIDENT IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM/NEIGHBORHOOD CIRCULATION STUDY INTRODUCTION Approximately eighteen months ago the City of Hermopa Beach had a Traffic Safety Evaluation of the enforcement -and engineering operation performed by the Institute of Transportation Studies (ITS) in cooperation with the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS). the results were in part very positive with respect to the engineering work effort versus manpower availability and budget constraints. There were areas that the representatives recommended additional study. The City has been diligently pursuing the recommendations by OTS during the past year and has made great progress in satisfying all but a few of the recommendations. There are however, areas that due to manpower commitments within the City cannot be initiated nor completed within the next year. Thus, the City is submitting this memorandum proposal to the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) in order for assistance to carry out these study recommendations. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM Two distinct areas of study have been identified by both the City and OTS. The need to continue to improve the present "high accident identification & surveillance program", and the need to study neighborhood circulation and traffic intrusion to avoid increased accidents on residential streets that are being forced to carry diverted commuter traffic. Both studies have elements not only common to each other, but in concert with the overall goals and objectives of the City's traffic engineering program. For example, OTS recommended expanding the traffic count program . Any study of high accident identification must include accident rates. This requires traffic volume data. Likewise, the proper signing, marking and regulation of access in a neighborhood traffic study can lead to a reduction in certain types of accidents that normally occur when neighborhood intrusion is high. Increasing traffic due to commercial developments, heavily congested morning and evening peak period commuter traffic and bumper to bumper beach oriented traffic continue to make it extremely difficult for Pacific Coast Highway to handle the traffic volumes. Neighborhood intrusion is on the increase and the sideswipe, right angle and parked vehicle accidents are increasing. There is a limited number of engineering personnel in the Public Works Department. A skeleton crew of the Public Works Director - 1 - and two technicians comprise the staff available. Limited funds also contribute to the lack of a completed comprehensive traffic safety program. Currently accident data is collected and filed from accident reports provided by the Police Department. These reports are analyzed for statistical content rather than for accident corrective action or prioritization. Selective enforcement efforts are not effectively applied because the accident data is not readily available. Manual compilation of the data_hinders a program to develop high accident locations.- As a result, accidents may have occurred at a location well before corrective measures can be taken. Current accident trends are shown in Table 1. TABLE 1 HERMOSA BEACH ACCIDENT HISTORY NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS YEAR FATAL INJURY PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL 1989 2 146 230 378 1988 0 140 233 363 1987 0 134 164 298 1986 0 117 274 391 1985 2 114 221 337 1984 1 144 195 340 1983 2 119 260 381 The City ,has completed an in-house effort to inventory its traffic control devices. The City is exploring available software to convert some of the manual data to computerized methods. The lack of a traffic count base with which to allow calculation of accident rates hinders the safety identification process. The City prior to the OTS review never had a comprehensive traffic count program. It relied on Caltrans, Los Angeles County, and private developers that may have a development proposal in need of supportive count data to provide the City's counts. Counts were scattered and not representative of a complete program. The City was denied grant funding in a 1989 request for an accident identification and surveillance program. Nevertheless the Public Works Department moved ahead with their limited manpower to establish a comprehensive traffic count program. The City Council approved funds to collect traffic count data and to establish a traffic count program. The program and the counts were completed in early 1990. The problem however, is that Hermosa Beach continues to lack certain data compilation and surveillance capabilities to complete the traffic safety program. The ITS Engineering and Enforcement team recognized these deficiencies in their study of City conditions. It recommended a comprehensive accident identification and surveillance program. The City has pursued this program as best they can due to limited 2 manpower and other traffic safety program priorities. It now needs assistance to complete the accident identification and surveillance program. PROJECT OBJECTIVES A program must be developed which can be implemented with a combination of outside and in-house assistance that is continued and maintained by present and future staff. The following objectives to accomplish this are: - Continue to maintain the current accident filing and compilation system to analyze all accidents for major causes and to identify areas for corrective action. - Develop a list of accident rates for up to 25 intersections and all collector and arterial midblock segments throughout the City. - Identify up to twenty five (25) high accident locations; update collision diagrams for all major intersections and develop corrective measures for the twenty highest locations. - Continue the traffic count program for the major and collector street system including manual turn movement counts. (The latter not collected with City funds). - Identify and study two similar residential areas of the City that are experiencing residential intrusion from commuter traffic. Develop residential traffic control strategies for improving flow for residents and reducing potential for intrusion. Use accident rate data and traffic volumes to assist in strategy and plan development. PROPOSED SOLUTION The City would develop and distribute a work plan to perform the following tasks: - Develop a high accident location and identification program which would include frequency of occurrence, severity and rate of occurrence as its main components. Provide traffic engineering services to assist and instruct City staff in the basic engineering concepts to maintain the program. - Use an outside traffic count contractor to supplement City machine traffic counts and to collect manual turn counts. - Conduct studies of two representative neighborhoods within Hermosa Beach where they are experiencing traffic intrusion due to the high traffic volumes of the major arterials, i.e. PCH. TIME REQUIRED The City anticipates that the program, can be completed within twelve to fifteen months after approval, by the Office of Traffic Safety. PROJECT COST ESTIMATE The cost for the consulting effort is estimated: at $35,000. Acquisition of machine traffic counters (4) to allow the City to maintain its count program would amount to an additional $5,500. 4 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Apeil 16, 1990 Regular Meeting of April 24, 1990 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #19790 (C.U.P. CON NO. 88-21) LOCATION: 1415 - 1423 MANHATTAN AVENUE APPLICANT(S): MIKE HUBBARD AND BILL JUCKES REQUEST: APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP FOR 4 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #19790 which is consistent with the approved Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map #19790 at their September 6, 1988 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director evin B. Northcraft City Manager T/srfinmap Respectfully submitted, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #19790 FOR A FOUR -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1415 1423 MANHATTAN AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on April 24, 1990 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 88-77, adop- ted after public hearing on September 6, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #19790 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lots 25 & 26, Tract 1124, as recorded in Book 17, Page 141 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles, for a four -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 1415 - 1423 Manhattan Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 24th day of April, 1990. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: T/rsfinmap CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL April 16, 1990 Regular Meeting of April 24, 1990 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #19969 (C.U.P. CON NO. 88-23) LOCATION: 918 7TH STREET APPLICANT(S): GREGORY AND ANN LUTZ REQUEST: APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP FOR 2-UNITCONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #19969 which is consistent with the approved Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map #19969 at their November 1, 1988 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: MiceI Scbubac Director Planning (144L,0144.01,',v, Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager T/srfinmap Respectfully submitted, /� Ken Robertson Associate Planner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 \\ RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #19969 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED ..AT 918 SEVENTH STREET AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on April 24, 1990 and made the following Findings: � A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Di vision 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with thefree and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 88-89, adop- ted after public hearing on November 1, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #19969 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 26, Wilson and Lind's.Tract, aS--recorded in Book 11, Page 73 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles, for a two -unit condominium project on land com- monly known as 918 7th Street, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 24th day of April, 1990. 0. ATTEST: T/rsfinmap PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 FINANCE-8FA340.. TIME 15:33:50 .....PAY .... YENDOR—NAME DESCRIPTION *** CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMANR_LISI__.. FOR 04/24/90 PAO.E__0001 DATE 04/19/90 YND. * ACCOUNT NUMBER IRN.J! Al1OUNT. • INV/REF CNKJI DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIFORNIA 00356 001-400-1121-4305 00145 $75.00 PUBLICATIONS/CITY CLERK VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 04/19/90 CITY CLERK /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES •-- $75.00 H ELAINE C. *DOERFLING 4200.00 PER DIEM ADVANCE /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $200.00 02055 001-400-1121-4317 00058 TR294 04/05/90• CITY CLERK * * * H GATES MC DONALD SETTLEMENT/D. ALLEN VENDOR TOTAL H H H H H H H 02596 705-400-1217-4182 00133 428,000.00 04/18/90 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR ******************************************************************** HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-90 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/4-1 TO 4-15-90 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-90 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-90 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-90 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-90 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-90 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-90 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-90 00243 001-202-0000-2030 04/04/90 00243 001-202-0000-2030 04/18/90 00243 105-202-0000-2030 04/04/90 00243 110-202-0000-2030 04/04/90 00243 145-202-0000—gp30 04/04/90 00243 155-202-0000-2030 04/04/90 00243 160-202-0000-2030 04/04/90 00243 170-202-0000-2030 04/04/90 428. 000. 00 00343 $208. 540. 48 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00344 4282, 458. 55 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00189 45, 107. 20 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00190 $42, 015.03 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00185 4- 1, 835.02 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00186 4- 4, 698.26 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00184 47, 431. 19 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00040 $17, 649.20 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00243 705-202-0000-2030 00147 04/04/90 42, 056. 87 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 09338 33151 40.00 04/19/90 TR294 00294 40.00 33143 04/18/90 10921 33149 $0.00 04/18/90 40.00 $0. 00 40. 00 $0. 00 40. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 10, 12 13 1A • 15 16 17 6 tY • 20 21 22 23 • 24 25 26 i 27 20 29 30 • 3, 33047 04/18/90 33150 04/18/90 33047 04/18/90 33047 04/18/90 33047 04/18/90 33047 04/18/90 33047 04/18/90 33047 04/18/90 33- 047 04/18/90 tk 32 33 34 • 35 36 37 36 • 30 40 41 42 • 43 44 45 46 • 47 46 419 0 • 5, 52 53 54 55 • 56 56 • 5Y 60 ei 62 • 83 64 6- 5 66 • 67 68 �.Q 70• 71 :4 .FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND .LIST_...__ FOR 04/24/90 PAGE 0002 DATE 04/19/90 VND__M......_ ACCOUNT -.NUMBER. _TRIC_&._.___.__AMOUNT.._..__..._-INV/REF PO * CHt DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $571,791.80 H IRONOAK SUPPLY WATER HEATER/THEATRE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $220.60 03343 001-400-4601-5602 00001 $220.60 04/18/90 COMM RESOURCES /IMPRVMTS OTHER THN BLDG * * * • LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CONFERENCE REQ/DOERFLING TR294 H LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES SEMINAR REG/E. DOERFLINC TR294 VENDOR TOTAL H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT ADV/MAR 90 03261 04/05/90 03261 04/05/90 001-400-1121-4317 00060 CITY CLERK 001-400-1121-4317 00061 CITY CLERK $175.00 /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $115.00 /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $290.00 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00391 $60,655.35- 04/11/90 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** SAN DIEGO HILTON HOTEL ADV/E. DOERFLING TR294 03345 04/05/90 $60,655.35 001-400-1121-4317 00059 $343.35 CITY CLERK /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** R A-1 COAST RENTALS MISC CHARGES/APRIL 90 00029 001-400-6101-4309 96730 04/15/90 PARKS $343.35 $661.576.10 00848 $80.64 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ACME VISIBLE RECORDS REPAIR POLICE RECORDS -0000 01574 001-400-2101-4309 00276 03/21/90 POLICE $80.64 10492 $0. 00 \ 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 33148 04/18/90 TR294 00294 33145 $0.00 04/18/90 TR294 00294 33146 $0.00 04/18/90 $0.00 TR294 00294 $0.00 296730 00041 $0.00 $85.40 11-745513-0000 10776 $0.00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ADVANCE ELEVATOR ELEVATOR MAINT/APR 90 $05.40 00003 001-400-4204-4201 00370 $80.00 23319 04/01/90 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 23319 00003 $0.00 33147 04/18/90 33144 04/18/90 33156 04/18/90 33157 04/18/90 33158 04/18/90 6 I0 11 12 13 14 19 16 17 16 10 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 20 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 39 30 40 42 43 44 46 47 45 40 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 58 50 60 62 83 64 66 61 611 7o 7172 74 75 7-1 n FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST..... ... ._ FOR 04/24/90 VND *. ACCOUNT NUMBER _.TRN..1l.... __________AMOUNT..... DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE 04/19/90 INV/REF__—____ __—PO .M ___..—CHK_!k AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************************a****** $80.00 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/APRIL 90 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS DISPATCH HEADSET PARTS R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/APRIL 90 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/APRIL 1990 9144 00935 001-400-2101-4201 9143 03/30/90 POLICE 00935 001-400-2101-4309 8449 03/26/90 POLICE 00556 00275 00935 001-400-2201-4201 00132 9143 03/30/90 FIRE 00935 110-400-3302-4307 03/30/90 00015 PARKING ENF $1,061.20 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $500.66 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $265.30 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $305.50 /RADIO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** RONALD G.*AKRIDGE REFUND PERMIT FEE 03341 001-300-0000-3115 92738 03/22/90 $2,132.66 02525 $5.00 /BUSINESS LICENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************•************************************** $5.00 R COMMANDER ANTHONY*ALTFELD MEALS/PATROL CLASS 00774 001-400-2101-4312 04/03/90 POLICE 01214 $24.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 86846 $24.00 9143 00070 33159 $0.00 04/18/90 8449 10190 33159 $500.65 04/18/90 9143 00070 33159 $0.00 04/18/90 9144 00073 33159 $0.00 04/18/90 92738 11002 $0.00 33160 04/18/90 10229 33161 $0.00 04/18/90 03337 001-210-0000-2110 03644 $100.00 86846 10565 04/12/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100.00 R APOLLO LEASING COMPANY LTD LEASE PMT/MAY 1990 02558 001-400-3104-6900 00040 $841.29 04/15/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $841.29 ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL UTILITY RAGS/MARCH 90 00152 001-400-2201-4309 03/31/90 FIRE 00860 $48.05 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00066 $0.00 00017 $0.00 33162 04/18/90 33163 04/18/90 33164 04/18/90 2 3 4 7 e 11 12 13 i4 15 16 2 22 23 24 25 26 27 31 3 3 3 4 4 •R • • • • 45 4 47 4 49 50 51 52 53 56 57 50 59 60 62 64 65 66 67 60 72 74 75 0 • • FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST.. .___. __. . FOR 04/24/90 PAY VENDOR. NAME VND. S.. _ ACCOUNT .NUMBER _TRN_11_ ________ _AMOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE __ _.._. 0004 DATE 04/19/90 INV/REF____ . _PO .*..____CHK_* AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-3104-4309 00460 $8.00 UTILITY RAGS/MARCH 90 03/31/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-4204-4309 01626 $160.39 UTILITY RAGS/MARCH 90 03/31/90 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-4205-4309 00456 $32.75 UTILITY RAGS/MARCH 90 03/31/90 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 110-400-3302-4309 00671 $13.83 UTILITY RAGS/MARCH 90 03/31/90 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $263.02 R AREA "D" OFC OF EMERG. SERV. SEMINAR REG/K. MITCHELL 03342 001-400-2701-4316 00033 $45.00 04/10/90 CIVIL DEFENSE /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ARTESIA SAWDUST PRODUCTS PLANTER SOIL/DOWNTOWN 38/49 $45.00 00017 $0.00 00017 $0.00 a 4a s a 33164 04/18/90 33164 04/18/90 00017- 33164 $0.00 04/18/90 00017 33164 $0.00 04/18/90 10292 $0.00 03347 001-400-8146-4201 00004 $264.74 71035/38/49 11122 03/29/90 CIP 89-146 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $264.74 * * * R ASPLUNDH REPAIR LIFT TRUCK VENDOR TOTAL 00487 105-400-2601-4309 00593 $224.38 21339 04/03/90 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ******************************************************************** $224.38 R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 00407 001-400-2101-4309 00281 $10.68 03/31/90 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00407 001-400-2101-4311 00862 $96.93 03/31/90 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00407 001-400-4204-4309 01625 $45.00 03/31/90 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $152.61 BALLOONACV, INC. 03064 001-400-4601-4308 00283 $100.00 AFTER SCHOOL PROG. SERV • 04/16/90 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS 21339 11114 $450.00 00035 $0.00 00035 $0.00 33165 04/18/90 33166 04/18/90 7 5 • 0 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 to 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 30 40 41 42 43 44 19 46 47 46 49 60 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 61 63 64 33167 04/18/90 33168 (04/18/90 33168 04/18/90 00035 33168 $0.00 04/18/90 10461 $100.00 33169 04/18/90 55 "3 67 58 70 0.1 7' ' 72 73 74 elk 75 —.FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR.. NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/24/90 VND.-* .. -.._ ACCOUNT...NUMBER-.----AMOUN-Y--- DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL************+t*******************x*********************************** R BANC ONE LEASING 99 LEASE PMT/MAY 1990 02154 04/15/90 PAGE_ 0004 DATE 04/19/90 ._..INV/REF— _pp* CHK—* AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $100.00 001-400-4205-6900 00058 $417.96 EQUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BANK OF AMERICA 00180 MAR EXP/S. WISNIEWSKI 04/16/90 POLICE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 5417. 96 001-400-2101-4316 00535 $95.97 /TRAINING R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 02509 03/31/90 02509 03/31/90 02509 03/31/90 02509 03/31/90 001-400-1201-4305 00158 CITY MANAGER /OFFICE 001-400-1206-4305 00435 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE 001-400-2101-4305 01228 POLICE /OFFICE 001-400-4201-4305 00556 BUILDING /OFFICE 02509 001-400-4601-4305 00811 03/31/90 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE $95.97 • $11.04 OPER SUPPLIES $11.53 OPER SUPPLIES $95.14 OPER SUPPLIES $36.79 OPER SUPPLIES $26.26 OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $180.76 R BEST WESTERN MOTEL HOTEL/M. HAUGEN 03255 001-400-2101-4313 03/31/90 POLICE 00267 $256.80 /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * R BISHOP MONTGOMERY HIGH SCHOOL REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 93880 01988 001-210-0000-2110 03643 04/12/90 $256.80 $500.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BLICKMAN, INC. THEATRE TECH/MAR 31/APR1 $500.00 03092 001-400-4601-4201 00538 $91.00 04/02/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00054 33170 50.00 04/18/90 10780 $0.00 00349 $0.00 00349 $0.00 00349 $0.00 00349 $0.00 33171. 04/18/90 33172 04/18/90 33172 04/18/90 33172 04/18/90 33172 04/18/90 00349 33172 $0.00 04/18/90 • 10284 33173 $0.00 04/18/90 93880 10564 $0.00 10471 $0.00 33174 04/18/90 33175 04/18/90 •w 1, 11 23 4 5 67 e 0 2 14 15 • • • • 16 17 ,e • 20 22 23 24 25 26 O 27 28 29 ]1 32 33 34 • 39 36 37 36 • 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 45 .7 4s 40 50 MI 51 52 e� 55 56 57 56 es 59 60 62 63 64 66 67 68 '" A ...FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR__NAME DESCRIPTION DATE INVC CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND_LIST FOR 04/24/90 _ PAGE -.__.0004 DATE 04/19/90 ACCOUNI.._NUMBER IRN_J* AMOUNT_ 'INV/REF PO * CH IL PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $91.00 . R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 04/15/90 . BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 04/15/90 001-400-1212-4188 01709 EMP BENEFITS 145-400-3401-4188 00884 DIAL A RIDE R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 145-400-3402-4188 00886 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 04/15/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************************** ESEA BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 * * * VENDOR TOTAL 01293 001-400-1212-4188 01713 04/15/90 EMP BENEFITS 01293 110-400-3302-4188 01148 04/15/90 PARKING ENF 01293 145-400-3401-4188 00886 04/15/90 DIAL A RIDE 01293 145-400-3402-4188 00888 04/15/90 ESEA 01293 04/15/90 01293 04/15/90 705-400-1209-4188 00249 LIABILITY INS 705-400-1217-4188 00248 WORKERS COMP $78.04 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.69 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.27 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ***** $79.00 $13,411.85 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $677.06 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $17.08 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $6.83 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $85.41 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $196.92 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ******************************************************************** BRAUN LINEN SERVICE PRISONER LAUNDRY/MAR 90 00163 001-400-2101-4306 03/31/90 POLICE $14,395.15 00787 $170.00 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $170.00 MARK*BRIGGS & ASSOCIATES, INC. CDBG ADMIN/MARCH 90 403-9 1 2 3 • 6 57 5 00055 $0.00 00055 $0.00 00055 $0.00 33176 04/18/90 33176 04/18/90 33176 04/18/90 • 10 1 12 13 4 16 16 �7 16 19 20 00056 $0.00 00056 $0.00 00056 $0.00 33177 04/18/90 33177 04/18/90 33177 04/18/90 00056 33177 $0.00 04/18/90 00056 33177 $0.00 04/18/90 00056 33177 $0.00 04/18/90 00038 $0.00 02478 140-400-4703-4201 00017 $2,297.46 403-9 10812 03/31/90 CDBG ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 33178 04/18/90 33179 04/18/90 22 23 24 27 26 27 26 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 .37 36 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 56 59 60 62 63 04 15 06 "5 67 0,1 71 72 4 :5 .....FINANCE—SEA340 . TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR. NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND.LISI FOR 04/24/90 DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION £AGE______0007 DATE 04/19/90 INV/REF PD # MCA AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,297.46 R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES TRASH PICKUP/APR 90 R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES TRASH PICKUP/APR 90 00155 04/01/90 00155 04/01/90 001-400-1208-4201 00644 GEN APPROP 110-400-3301-4201 00256 VEH PKG DIST 3507. 49 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $516.63 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $1,024.12 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES DUMP CHARGES/MARCH 90 37002 2 4 5 5 s a 00005 33180 $0.00 04/18/90 00005 33180 $0.00 04/18/90 00158 001-400-3103-4201 00268 $4,278.74 900300-0037002 00004 03/31/90 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMS PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 R GARY#BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMS PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMS PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 R R R R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMS PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMS PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMS PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 $4,278.74 02016 001-400-1201-4305 00157 $0.20 04/16/90 CITY MANAGER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 02016 04/16/90 001-400-1202-4305 00308 $5.38 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 02016 001-400-2101-4305 01227 $21.43 04/16/90 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 02016 001-400-2101-4306 00786 $45.42 04/16/90 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 02016 001-400-2101-4309 00277 $2.78 04/16/90 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 02016 001-400-2101-4316 00536 $58.93 04/16/90 POLICE /TRAINING 02016 001-400-2201-4305 00346 $0.45 04/16/90 FIRE 02016 001-400-2201-4316 04/16/90 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00218 $5.00 /TRAINING 02016 001-400-4101-4316 00175 $66.30 04/16/90 PLANNING /TRAINING 33181 04/18/90 10566 33183 $0.00 04/18/90 33183 04/18/90 10566 $0.00 10566 $0.00 10566 $0.00 10566 $0.00 33183 04/18/90 33183 04/18/90 33183 04/18/90 10566 33183 $0.00 04/18/90 10566 33183 $0.00 04/18/90 10566 33183 $0.00 04/18/90 10566 33183 $0.00 04/18/90 • 0 2 14 15 16 17 16 10 20 zi 22 23 24 25 26 w n 28 w • w za 311 3 w 32 33 34 w 35 36 37 35 3: fro 40 41 42 43 44 45 47 46 49 50A 51 54 75 56 38 w 5a 60 62 83 411 64 63 65 a 67 a )1 72 • ,5 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR..NAME DESCRIPTION R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 R QARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 R QARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMS PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 * * * R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 4/12 VENDOR TOTAL •CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND .LIST ... _.. __ ___ _.... FOR 04/24/90 VND_N._.. _ ACCOUNT-.NUMBER_.._TRN-*.__.___._______AMOUNT_ DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02016 001-400-4201-4305 00554 04/16/90 BUILDING 02016 04/16/90 02016 04/16/90 02016 04/16/90 02016 04/16/90 02016 04/16/90 001-400-4201-4305 00555 BUILDING 001-400-4204-4309 01620 BLDG MAINT 001-400-4205-4311 00176 EQUIP SERVICE 001-400-4601-4305 00810 COMM RESOURCES 001-400-4601-4308 00282 COMM RESOURCES 02016 001-400-6101-4309 00847 04/16/90 PARKS 02016 04/16/90 145-400-3406-4201 00019 CIRC ELEMENT PAGE.- _0008_ _. _ 0008 __—, DATE 04/19/90 2 3 4 e 7 e a 10 11 12 .INV/REF —PO N CHK 11 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $2.18 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $3.00 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $10.64 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $20.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $10.49 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $59. 80 /PROGRAM MATERIALS $22. 21 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $18.45 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ******************************************************************** $352.66 BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY FAX PAPER/POLICE 63060 00034 001-400-2101-4305 01222 04/09/90 POLICE $195.67 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. PARKS MAINT/MARCH 90 70003 R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. PARKS MAINT/MARCH 90 76003 00599 03/31/90 00599 03/31/90 001-400-3101-4201 MEDIANS 001-400-6101-4201 PARKS $195. 67 10566 $0.00 10566 $0.00 10566 $0.00 10566 $0. 00 33183 04/18/90 33183 04/18/90 33183 04/18/90 33183 04/18/90 10566 33183 $0.00 04/18/90 10566 33183 $0.00 04/18/90 10566 33183 $0.00 04/18/90 10566 $0.00 163060 10740 $196.57 00040 $3,150.00 0470003 00061 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0. 00 00177 $10,025.62 0076003 00061 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 $13.175.62 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** CA STATE ASSOC OF LOCAL ELEC DUES/G. BRUTSCH 00785 001-400-1141-4315 00033 $40.00 03/29/90 CITY TREASURER /MEMBERSHIP 33183 04/18/90 33184 04/18/90 33185 04/18/90 33185 04/18/90 10557 33186 $0.00 04/18/90 13 4 15 1e 17 18 10 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 20. 20 3C 31 32 as 35 36 37 3e 30 40 41 42 43 44 45 4e'` 47 49 43 50 ' 51 52 s.� 54 53 56 577 50 59 00 of 02r.0% 83 e4 03 66,^ 67 6R no 7^/► 71 72 77 Pw ___.FINANCE-SFA340. TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR__. NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/24/90 VND_.#____..__ ACCOUNT _NUMBER...._IRN_._!E_._ ____AMOUNT_ DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $40.00 R CALIF MUNICIPAL TREASURERS 01167 001-400-1141-4316 00037 $16.01 PUBLICATIONS/CTY TREAS. 03/29/90 CITY TREASURER /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICIALS DUES/FISCAL YR 1989-90 $16.01 00411 001-400-4201-4315 00092 $115.00 04/10/90 BUILDING /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4115.00 R CANADA LIFE 00046 001-400-1212-4188 01711 4735.30 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 04/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4735.30 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 00239 001-400-1212-4188 01707 04/15/90 EMP BENEFITS 00239 105-400-2601-4188 00935 04/15/90 STREET LIGHTING 00239 110-400-3301-4188 00876 04/15/90 VEH PKG DIST 00239 110-400-3302-4188 01146 04/15/90 PARKING ENF 00239 145-400-3401-4188 00882 04/15/90 DIAL A RIDE 00239 145-400-3402-4188 00884 04/15/90 ESEA 00239 145-400-3403-4188 00260 04/15/90 BUS PASS SUBSDY 00239 155-400-2102-4188 00495 04/15/90 CROSSING GUARD $3,070.54 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $99.63 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $4.15 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $573.94 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $5.16 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.76 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.95 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $14.45 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS EAGE___0009 DATE 04/19/90 CHK_#_____ AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 10556 33187 40.00 04/18/90 10378 33188 40.00 04/18/90 00008 33189 40.00 04/18/90 00022 33190 40.00 04/18/90 00022 33190 40.00 04/18/90 00022 33190 $0.00 04/18/90 00022 33190 $0.00 04/18/90 00022 33190 $0.00 04/18/90 00022 33190 $0.00 04/18/90 00022 33190 $0.00 04/18/90 00002 33190 $0.00 04/18/90 55 7 e 10 II 12 14 15 16 7 16 10 20 2* • 40 • • • 22 • 23 24 25 2e • 27 76 2a 31 • 32 33 34 • 35 36 37 3e • 3P 40 41 ` 43 44 n_+ ,) • 47 46 51 • 52 53 A SS 56 76 56 60 ei 62 • e3 64 65 • 67 66 �n • • .FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR._NAME DESCRIPTION R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND_LISI FOR 04/24/90 ACCOUNT..NUMBER. ._TRN._M_.___ _.:AMOUNT._ DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00239 160-400-3102-4188 00877 $94.78 04/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00239 705-400-1209-4188 00246 04/15/90 LIABILITY INS 00239 705-400-1217-4188 00245 04/15/90 WORKERS COMP $17. 77 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $6. 31 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $3,890.44 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** PAGE 0010 DATE 04/19/90 INV/REF Pn $AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R CENTINELA SO. BAY VISA 03353 001-400-1201-4315 00060 $8.00 ANNUAL FEE/VISA CARD 04/12/90 CITY MANAGER /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 2252 00389 001-400-2101-4305 03/31/90 POLICE $8. 00 01229 $8.47 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC. CHARGES/MAR-APR 90 00014 001-400-2101-4311 04/15/90 POLICE $8. 47 00863 $277. 13 /AUTO MAINTENANCE R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-4204-4311 00140 $16.72 MISC. CHARGES/MAR-APR 90 04/15/90 BLDG MAINT /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CHEVRON USA, INC. MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 00634 001-400-2101-4310 03/31/90 POLICE 00245 *293.85 $288. 19 /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENTAL/MAR 90 R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENTAL/MAR 90 00153 03/31/90 00153 03/31/90 001-400-4202-4187 00139 PUB WKS ADMIN 110-400-3302-4187 00228 PARKING ENF $288. 19 $630. 50 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $52. 50 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 2 3 4 00022 33190 $0.00 04/18/90 00022 $0. 00 00022 $0. 00 33190 04/18/90 33190 04/18/90 09161 33191 $0.00 04/18/90 2252 00311 $0. 00 33192 04/18/90 00412 33193 $0.00 04/18/90 • 00412 33193 $0.00 04/18/90 00365 33194 $0.00 04/18/90 00002 33195 $0.00 04/18/90 00002 33195 $0.00 04/18/90 6 e 7 s a to II 12 is 14 15 to 16 IS 20 21 22 23 24 23 26 27 26 29 3.. " 31 32 33 34 .-.' 35 36 37 36 30 40 41 47 A1 43 44 45 46 6 47 46 49 53 ON 51 52 53 54 . 55 56 57 780% 50 6,) ;891 63 64 .35 ego 67 683 1110 71 72 e4 75 0, .._.FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR. NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH . DEMAND LIST - ..._—...---. FOR 04/24/90 VND.-#..... ACCOUNT .NUMBER DATE INVC PROJ Ik ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE—_ —._ 0011 , DATE 04/19/90 2 3 M-- 6 - AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 10 12 13 1s 1e ii e 19 20 0 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $683.00 * * * COAST IRRIGATION CO. SPRINKLERS AND PARTS VENDOR TOTAL R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/FEB 90 COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 90 R COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DIST/FEB 90 R COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DIST/FEB 90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 90 COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DIST/FEB 90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 90 COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DIST/FEB 90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 90 COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/FEB 90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/FEB 90 02/28/90 00354 125-400-8508-4309 00017 44212 04/05/90 CIP 85-508 00017 001-400-1101-4304 00284 02/28/90 CITY COUNCIL 001-400-1121-4304 00278 00017 03/31/90 CITY CLERK 00017 001-400-1121-4304 00280 02/28/90 CITY CLERK 00017 001-400-1131-4304 00204 02/28/90 CITY ATTORNEY 00017 03/31/90 001-400-1141-4304 00299 CITY TREASURER 00017 001-400-1141-4304 00301 02/28/90 CITY TREASURER 00017 03/31/90 001-400-1201-4304 00323 CITY MANAGER 00017 001-400-1201-4304 00325 02/28/90 CITY MANAGER 00017 001-400-1202-4304- 00324 03/31/90 FINANCE ADMIN 00017 001-400-1202-4304 00326 02/28/90 FINANCE ADMIN 00017 001-400-1203-4304 00331 03/31/90 PERSONNEL 00017 001-400-1203-4304 00333 PERSONNEL $1.013.12 44213/44212 11123 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $1.015.14 $1.013.12 $2.52 /TELEPHONE $3.49 /TELEPHONE $10.69 /TELEPHONE $10.25 /TELEPHONE $20.17 /TELEPHONE $10.35 /TELEPHONE $8.32 /TELEPHONE $7.06 /TELEPHONE $46.84 /TELEPHONE $36.70 /TELEPHONE $14.09 /TELEPHONE $22.13 /TELEPHONE 33196 04/18/90 00215 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 00315 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 00215 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 00215 $0.00 00315 $0.00 0- 0215 $0.00 00315 $0.00 0- 0215 $0.00 00315 $0.00 00215 $0.00 00315 $0.00 00215 30.00 33198 04/18/90 33198 04/18/90 33198 04/18/90 33198 04/18/90 33198 04/18/90 33198 04/18/90 33198 04/18/90 33198 04/18/90 33198 04/18/90 21 0 OP 22 elp 23 24 2s 26 A 27 26 29 30 AI 31 32 33 34 A 36 *1' 36 37 36 ,OW 39 40 41 47 43 44 45 46/' 47 46 49 503'4 e1 52 53 s4 ^ s6 se 77 sa s9 60 of 62 04. 63 64 ef.#4 67 60 rip 70 pi 71 72 40 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR. NAME DESCRIPTION R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/MARCH 90 R COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DIST/FEB 90 COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 90 COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DIST/FEB 90 COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DIST/FEB 90 R COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/FEB 90 R COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/FEB 90 R COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 90 COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/FEB 90 R COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 90 COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DIST/FEB 90 R COM SYSTEMS, ,INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 90 VND.. B . DATE INVC CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/24/90 ACCOUNT .NUMBER .._TRN..*_.... ___,_.____._AMOUNT..._. PROJ * ACCOUNT DES 00017 001-400-2101-4304 00543 03/31/90 POLICE 00017 001-400-2101-4304 00545 02/28/90 POLICE 00017 03/31/90 001-400-4101-4304 00326 PLANNING 00017 001-400-4101-4304 00328 02/28/90 PLANNING 00017 001-400-4201-4304 00315 02/28/90 BUILDING 00017 001-400-4202-4304 00331 03/31/90 PUB WKS ADMIN 00017 001-400-4202-4304 00333 02/28/90 PUB WKS ADMIN 00017 001-400-4601-4304 00376 03/31/90 COMM RESOURCES 00017 001-400-4601-4304 00378 02/28/90 COMM RESOURCES 00017 001-400-6101-4304 00216 03/31/90 PARKS 00017 001-400-6101-4304 02/28/90 PARKS 00017 03/31/90 00218 105-400-2601-4304 00138 STREET LIGHTING 00017 105-400-2601-4304 00139 02/28/90 STREET LIGHTING 00017 03/31/90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 LONG DIST/FEB 90 02/28/90 110-400-3302-4304 00327 PARKING ENF 110-400-3302-4304 00329 PARKING ENF CRIPTION $290.95 /TELEPHONE $300.22 /TELEPHONE $27.73 /TELEPHONE $29.43 /TELEPHONE $68.15 /TELEPHONE $60.44 /TELEPHONE $80.24 /TELEPHONE $60.82 /TELEPHONE $88.84 /TELEPHONE $28.35 /TELEPHONE $7.82 /TELEPHONE $14. 81 /TELEPHONE $21.58 /TELEPHONE $100.57 /TELEPHONE $28.15 /TELEPHONE • .PAGE..._ _... -0012- DATE 0012..DATE 04/19/90 __Ckiti_11_- AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00315 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 00215 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 00315 33198 $0.00 04/10/90 00215 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 00215 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 00315 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 00215 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 00315 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 00215 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 00315 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 00215 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 00315 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 00215 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 00315 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 00215 33198 $0.00 04/18/90 11 2 /** 3 4 4 6 /1 7 6 10 /'5 11 12 13 u 15 I6 16 ID 2) 22 A5 23 24 25 26 n 27 20 29 30 eN 31 32 33 34 . 35 36 37 36 n 39 40 41 4; /1 45 46 A 41 46 49 50 /1 51 52 53 54 r,/ 55 56 57 56 ^ 56 60 61 624110 63 64 65 600 67 65 ec )O t 72 :i 4 75 A FINANCE-SEA340 TIME 15: 33: 50 PAY VENDOR. NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LISI FOR 04/24/90 VND.. #...... ACCOUNT...NUMBER. _7RN..!!_...._ ___..AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CPOA/CPOERT TUITION/3 OFFICERS RAGE 001'7 DATE 04/19/90 INV/REF___._ _PO # ___ _._CHK_# ..... AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1,400.71 01796 001-400-2101-4312 01215 $204.00 04/15/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $204.00 * * * CRAWFORD'S CARPET CLEANING CLEAN CARPETS/POLICE DEP 6687 VENDOR TOTAL 03324 001-400-4204-4309 01619 $50.00 04/08/90 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ******************************************************************** R CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRAINING CTR TUITION/D. JONES/MOTORS *** VENDOR TOTAL $50.00 02546 001-400-2101-4312 01220 $1,050.00 04/10/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE POST ******************************************************************** R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE & SHELTER COST/MARCH 90 *** VENDOR TOTAL $1,050.00 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00129 $732.10 04/10/90 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT ******************************************************************** R DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES SALES TAX/AMBULANCE $732.10 00571 001-400-2201-5403 00009 $1,950.08 04/19/90 FIRE /VEHICLES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,950.08 R MARTHA*DIAZ 03346 001-210-0000-2110 03640 $50.00 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 93547 03/29/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00 R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY IBM COPIER METER USE/FEB 42018 R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY IBM COPIER MAINT/MAR 90 42018 10230 33199 $0.00 04/18/90 6687 10699 33200 $50.00 04/18/90 10298 $0.00 33201 04/18/90 00014 33202 $0.00 04/18/90 00122 33203 $0.00 04/19/90 93547 10553 33204 $0.00 04/18/90 02840 001-400-1208-4201 00642 $339.80 006M42019 00368 33205 04/01/90 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/18/90 02840 001-400-1208-4201 00643 $255.00 006M42018 00368 33205 04/01/90 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/18/90 .FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR.. NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FOR 04/24/90 VND. N ...... ACCOUNT..NUMBER DATE INVC PROJ S ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $594.80 R EASTMAN, INC. MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 64573 02514 03/31/90 001-400-1208-4305 00747 $659.41 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** EASY READER PUBLIC NOTICING/MAR 90 $659.41 00181 001-400-1121-4323 00095 $1,491.05 0268 03/31/90 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.491.05 * * * R OFCR TOM*ECKERT PER DIEM/K-9 DRUG TRNG VENDOR TOTAL 01958 001-400-2101-4316 TR295 04/11/90 210005 POLICE 00533 $643.75 /TRAINING ******************************************************************** R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 90 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 90 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 90 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 90 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 90 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 90 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 90 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 90 00165 03/31/90 00165 03/31/90 00165 03/31/90 00165 03/31/90 00165 03/31/90 00165 03/31/90 00165 03/31/90 00165 03/31/90 001-400-2101-4311 00859 POLICE 001-400-2201-4311 00328 FIRE 001-400-2401-4311 00183 ANIMAL CONTROL 001-400-3101-4311 00010 MEDIANS 001-400-3103-4311 00554 ST MAINTENANCE 001-400-3104-4311 00044 TRAFFIC SAFETY 001-400-4201-4311 00196 BUILDING 001-400-4202-4311 00139 PUB WKS ADMIN $643.75 $799. 43 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $56.34 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $117. 16 /AUTO MAINTENANCE. $213. 63 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $306.99 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $119.44 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $128. 98 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $167.20 /AUTO MAINTENANCE DATE 04/19/90 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 664573 00366 33206 $0.00 04/18/90 0268 00367 33207 $0.00 04/18/90 TR295 00295 $0. 00 00322 $0.00 00322 $0.00 00322 $0.00 00322 $0.00 33208 04/18/90 33210 04/19/90 33210 04/18/90 33210 04/18/90 33210 04/18/90 00322 33210 $0.00 04/18/90 00322 33210 $0.00 04/18/90 00322 33210 $0.00 04/18/90 00322 33210 $0.00 04/18/90 22 23 24 25 2. 27 2 29 3- 31 3 3 3 3. 3 3, 3- 4 41 4. 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 s7 50 59 60 62 63 64 n1 ege 66 67 66 7C I^ 71 72 7] 74 75 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR..NAME DESCRIPTION R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 90 R R * * * EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MLSC. CHARGES/MARCH 90 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 90 PARTS EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 90 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 90 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 90 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 90 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 90 VENDOR TOTAL R EL CAMINO COLLEGE TUITION/5 OFCRS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND.LISI._....__. __...._ FOR 04/24/90 VND..# . _ _..._ ACCOUNT. NUMBER DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00165 03/31/90 00165 03/31/90 00165 03/31/90 00165 03/31/90 001-400-4204-4311 00139 BLDG MAINT 001-400-4205-4309 00454 EQUIP SERVICE 001-400-4205-4311 00175 EQUIP SERVICE 001-400-4601-4311 00081 COMM RESOURCES 00165 001-400-6101-4311 03/31/90 PARKS $74. 15 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $1,017.16 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $390. 09 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $7. 00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00213 /AUTO 00165 105-400-2601-4311 00168 03/31/90 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO 00165 110-400-3302-4311 00579 03/31/90 PARKING ENF /AUTO 00165 03/31/90 160-400-3102-4311 00147 SEWER/ST DRAIN /AUTO 01469 001-400-2101-4312 01216 03/29/90 POLICE $132. 06 MAINTENANCE $69. 04 MAINTENANCE $200. 12 MAINTENANCE $31. 89 MAINTENANCE /TRAVEL *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3,830.68 $12. 50 EXPENSE , POST $12.50 R ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 02354 001-400-3103-6900 00050 $1,736.78 LEASE PMT/MAY 90 9-479 04/15/90 ST MAINTENANCE /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R EXECUTIVE—SUITE SERVICES INC. JANITOR SERV/MARCH 90 $1,736.78 eAGE.___ _ 0015 DATE 04/19/90 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00322 33210 $0.00 04/18/90 00322 $0. 00 33210 04/18/90 00322 33210 $0.00 04/18/90 00322 33210 $0.00 04/18/90 00322 33210 $0.00 04/18/90 00322 33210 $0.00 04/18/90 00322 $0. 00 00322 $0. 00 10285 $0. 00 0000479-479 00060 $0. 00 01294 001-400-4204-4201 00371 $1,325.00 03/31/90 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS $1,325.00 01207 160-400-3102-4309 00471 $1,150.77 SEWER RODS 12845 04/03/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 33210 04/18/90 33210 04/18/90 33211 04/18/90 33212 04/18/90 00062 33213 $0.00 04/18/90 12845 11121 33214 $1, 150. 77 04/18/90 23 4 6 0 7 e 41- 2 2 1; ,45 ,5 r • w ,6 17 ,6 0 IS 20 21 22 0 23 24 25 260 27 26 2D q# 3, 32 33 u* 35 36 37 36 0 3: 40 41 44; 44 45 46 0 47 46 49 50 . 5, 52 53 54 • 55 56 57 56 0 5: 60 ei 62 . 63 64 65 6167 • 67 66 60 7Cf „ 72 74 . 75 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR.. NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST_ __________ FOR 04/24/90 _ VND.. B _ _.._ .__ ..ACCOUNT. _NUMBER ... _IRN _IE_.. ___ _AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION • _ ____.PAGE..__..__0016 DATE 04/19/90 INV/REF -__PD It' Ck1K—M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP — *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 111, 150: 77 R JANET*FURNEE' 02610 001-400-4601-4201 00539 THEATRE TECH/MAR 19-24 03/27/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *95. 00 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *95. 00 R GUILLERMO*GARCIA WORK GUAR. REFUND 83247 00638 001-210-0000-2110 03/29/90 03641 41, 575.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 41.575.00 * * * R RESERVE OFCR GEORGE*GARRETT EMERG. FILM PURCHASE VENDOR TOTAL R GATES MC DONALD REIMB WORK COMP/MAR 90 *** VENDOR TOTAL * * * 02665 001-400-2101-4305 01223 *49.60 03/27/90 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *49. 60 02596 705-400-1217-4182 00134 413,059.01 03/31/90 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR ******************************************************************** *13,059.01 R GATES, MCDONALD & COMPANY CONTRACT PMT/APRIL 90 00402 VENDOR TOTAL 93247 02538 705-400-1217-4201 00072 *1,333.34 137330000402 04/10/90 WORKERS COMP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ******************************************************************** 41.333.34 R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY MISC CHARGES/APRIL 90 00058 105-400-2601-4309 00595 *316.69 04/15/90 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 90 —0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHCS/APR 90 —0200 *316. 69 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00283 *5.65 04/01/90 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00279 *16.15 04/01/90 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE 10469 33215 *0.00 04/18/90 - 2 ON 2 4 10558 33216 *0.00 04/18/90 10770 40. 00 33217 04/18/90 10922 33218 *0.00 04/18/90 00044 *0. 00 33219 04/18/90 00424 33220 *0.00 04/18/90 318-0200 00462 *0. 00 318-0200 00462 *0. 00 33222 04/18/90 33222 04/18/90 5 6 7 s a to 11 12 13 14 t5 16 17 ID 10 20 21 22 1' 23 24 25 26 27 26 29 30" 31 32 n 34 ell 35 36 37 36 /1 30 40 41 421111 43. 44 45 46 /A 47 48 49 50 A 51 52 5-3- 4 et 34/, 55 68 57 50 el 50 60 61 62 n 63 64 63 66 87 69 :q TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR_. NAME DESCRIPTION R R R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHCS/APR 90 -0200 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHCS/APR 90 -0200 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 90 -0200 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 90 -0200 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 90 -0200 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 90 -0200 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH _DEMAND LIST FOR 04/24/90 VND_#_.__._._A000UNI_NUMBER _IRNA! AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 04/01/90 00015 04/01/90 00015 04/01/90 001-400-1131-4304 00203 CITY ATTORNEY 001-400-1141-4304 00300 CITY TREASURER 001-400-1201-4304 00324 CITY MANAGER 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00325 04/01/90 FINANCE ADMIN 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00332 04/01/90 PERSONNEL 00015 04/01/90 00015 04/01/90 001-400-1206-4304 00221 DATA PROCESSING 001-400-1207-4304 00183 BUS LICENSE 00015 001-400-1208-4304 00053 04/01/90 GEN APPROP 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00544 04/01/90 POLICE 00015 04/01/90 00015 04/01/90 001-400-2201-4304 00246 FIRE 001-400-2401-4304 00295 ANIMAL CONTROL 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00327 04/01/90 PLANNING 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00314 04/01/90 BUILDING 00015 04/01/90 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 90 -0200 04/01/90 , 001-400-4202-4304 00332 PUD WKS ADMIN 001-400-4601-4304 00377 COMM RESOURCES $8.08 /TELEPHONE $12.11 /TELEPHONE $14.89 /TELEPHONE $53.99 /TELEPHONE $19.38 /TELEPHONE $24.23 /TELEPHONE $16.15 /TELEPHONE $8.08 /TELEPHONE $310.17 /TELEPHONE $8.08 /TELEPHONE $12.11 /TELEPHONE $40.38 /TELEPHONE $68.79 /TELEPHONE $84.22 /TELEPHONE $16.15 /TELEPHONE PAGE 00 DATE 04/19/90 INV/REF * CHIT -#-- AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 318-0200 00462 33222 *0.00 04/18/90 318-0200 00462 33222 $0.00 04/18/90 318-0200 00462 33222 $0.00 04/18/90 318-0200 00462 33222 $0.00 04/18/90 318-0200 00462 33222 $0.00 04/18/90 318-0200 00462 33222 $0.00 04/18/90 .... .. .. 318-0200 00462 33222 $0.00 04/18/90 318-0200 00462 33222 $0.00 04/18/90 318-0200 00462 33222 $0.00 04/18/90 318-0200 00462 33222 $0.00 04/18/90 318-0200 00462 33222 $0.00 04/18/90 318-0200 00462 33222 $0.00 04/18/90 318-0200 00462 33222 $0.00 04/18/90 318-0200 00462 33222 $0.00 04/18/90 318-0200 00462 33222 $0.00 04/18/90 14 15 16 17 16 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 20 31 3 3 3 3 4 5 6 T 41 43 44 1', 46 47 46 49 50 51 52 5; 54 55 56 5, 50 59 CO 61 07 60 4 l5 r. 8 r4 FINANCE-SF_A340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR_NAME DESCRIPTION R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHCS/APR 90 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHCS/APR 90 -0200 *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************+i•*****•r**************************** CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH . DEMAND...LIST......_..-_.. _. FOR 04/24/90 DATE 04/19/90 VND_. # . _....__-ACCOUNII_NUMBER_._ .__IRUI _!!-.___�__.9MO.UNL____.__._. DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00015 04/01/90 00015 04/01/90 001-400-6101-4304 00217 $8.08 PARKS /TELEPHONE • 110-400-3302-4304 00328 $93.68 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE * * * GTEL PHONE CHANGES/POLICE 18145 GTEL EQUIPMENT RENT/APRIL 90 GTEL EQUIPMENT RENT/APRIL 90 GTEL EQUIPMENT RENT/APRIL 90 VENDOR TOTAL ************** GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 01340 04/01/90 001-400-2101-4304 POLICE *820. 37 00541 $221.09 /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-2101-4304 00542 $46.23 04/01/90 POLICE /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-2201-4304 00245 • $92.56 04/01/90 FIRE /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-4601-4304 00375 *99.72 04/01/90 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE $459.60 02623 001-400-1212-4188 01703 $2.043.95 04/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 105-400-2601-4188 00932 $- 4.20 04/15/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 110-400-3302-4188 01142 $104.73 04/15/90 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .02623 145-400-3401-4188 00879 04/.15/90 DIAL A RIDE 145-400-3402-4188 00881 ESEA 02623 04/15/90 02623 145-400-3403-4188 00258 $2.22 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.14 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $3.43 04/15/90 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 160-400-3102-4188 00874 $- 2- 7.30 04/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 318-0200 00462 33222 $0.00 04/18/90 318-0200 00462 33222 30.00 04/18/90 2218145 09993 33223 $0.00 04/18/90 00426 33223 30.00 04/18/90 00426 33223 $0.00 04/18/90 00426 33223 $0.00 04/18/90 00001 $0.00 00001 $0.00 33224 04/18/90 33224 04/18/90 00001 33224 $0.00 04/18/90 00001 33224 $0.00 04/18/90 00001 33224 $0.00 04/18/90 00001 $0.00 00001 $0.00 33224 04/18/90 33224 04/18/90 r 2 09 6 A 0 10 12 13 14 16 16 0% 25 26 27 26 26 37 31 3. 3 3 3• 3 3+ ON 3, 4• 41 4 ^ 4 4 45 46 " 4 4. 46 50 OA 51 62 53 54 55 56 s; 70 50 60 62 63 64 05 .1 0 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR.. NAME DESCRIPTION R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,249.54 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/24/90 ACCOUNT__NUMBER., _TRN_fl_._ ____AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02623 705-400-1209-4188 00243 $28.66 04/15/90 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 705-400-1217-4188 00242 04/15/90 WORKERS COMP $33.91 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS RAGE 0019—_ DATE 04/19/90 2\ 3 4 INV/REF _—_RO M ___._CNK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP HAINES AND COMPANY CRISS—CROSS DIRECTORY/PD 14596 00878 001-400-2101-4305 01224 $301.31 04/05/90 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $301.31 R HALPRIN SUPPLY COMPANY SAFETY HELMETS/FIRE DEPT 31440 00946 001-400-2201-4187 04/04/90 FIRE 00231 $102.16 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $102.16 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MICHAEL*HAUGEN MEALS/M. HAUGEN 00721 001-400-2101-4313 00268 03/27/90 POLICE $111.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $111.00 R HAWTHONE POLICE DEPARTMENT CONTRACT PMT/JAN—MAR 90 HB25 00172 001-400-2101-4251 00301 04/01/90 POLICE $2,400.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES/FEB 90 R HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 R HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES/FEB 90 R HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 4777 4777 00065 02/28/90 00065 03/31/90 00065 02/28/90 00065 03/31/90 001-400-2101-4311 00860 POLICE 001-400-2101-4311 00861 POLICE 001-400-2401-4311 00184 ANIMAL CONTROL 001-400-4201-4311 00197 BUILDING $2,400.00 $44.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $128.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $4.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $4.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00001 $0.00 33224 04/18/90 00001 33224 $0.00 04/18/90 14596 10773 $0.00 33225 04/18/90 23 24 25 26 ..1 27 26 2w 3') !.. 31 32 6 57 e D 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 16 ID 20 21 A 4 se m 22 . *, 31440 08377 33226 $102.15 04/18/90 10283 33227 $0.00 04/18/90 HB25 00042 $0.00 4777 00228 $0.00 00328 $0.00 4777 00228 $0.00 00328 $0.00 33228 04/18/90 33229 04/18/90 33229 04/18/90 33229 04/18/90 33229 04/18/90 13 34 35 36 37 30 es 39 40 41 42 , 43 44 45 46 n 47 46 4D 11 52 53 54 ,-.. 55 56 57 56 _ 59 60 01 02 63 64 66 r. 07 60 70 r1 71 l7 :4 ^ :71 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR._NAME DESCRIPTION * * * R R R R R HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES/FEB 90 4777 HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 VENDOR TOTAL HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY COMPUTER SYS MAINT/APR S1S67 HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY SOFTWARE SUPP/APR—JUN 90 P4538 HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY COMPUTER MAINT/APR—JUN90 P1S94 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND .LIST-_ _ FOR 04/24/90 .. VND._ * _....... ACCOUNT. .NUMBER . __IRN._* _.. ____AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00065 001-400-4202-4311 00140 03/31/90 PUB WKS ADMIN 00065 110-400-3302-4311 00580 02/28/90 PARKING ENF 00065 110-400-3302-4311 00581 03/31/90 PARKING ENF . 00149 001-400-1206-4201 00698 04/02/90 DATA PROCESSING 00149 04/02/90 00149 04/02/90 001-400-1206-4201 00699 DATA PROCESSING 001-400-1206-4201 00700 DATA PROCESSING *4.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *4.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 164.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE PAGE.. __ _._0020__ DATE 04/19/90 INV/REF _ PO * ant_*. AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *192.00 00328 *0.00 4777 00228 *0.00 00328 $0.00 *1,223.00 9591967 00009 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *3,314.60 7TP4538 00032 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 *2,172.00 95P1594 00010 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOC. CONTRACT PMT/JAN—MAR 90 1004 *6,709.60 03131 001-400-1202-4201 00208 *900.00 04/05/90 FINANCE ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R INTERNATIONAL CONF OF BLDG OFF ' PUBLICATIONS/FIRE DEPT 93283 R INTERNATIONAL CONF OF BLDG OFF. SEMINAR/KOWATSCHITSCH 90332 00781 001-400-2201-4305 04/04/90 FIRE $900.00 00345 $123.57 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00781 001-400-4201-4316 00202 $255.00 03/23/90 BUILDING /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** J. E. AUTO BODY REPAIR DETECTIVE UNIT /3648 03319 04/16/90 4378.57 705-400-1210-4324 00009 33,859.85 AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL*************'******************************************************* R DONALD*JONES MEALS/HOTEL/MOTORS CLASS $3, 859. 85 02627 001-400-2101-4312 01219 $787.50 04/10/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 33229 04/18/90 33229 04/18/90 33229 04/18/90 2 3 • 33230 04/18/90 33230 04/18/90 33230 04/18/90 1004 00075 33231 30.00 04/18/90 C93283 08391 $117'.15 E90332 10335 $0.00 3554/3648 10745 $3,859.85 33232 04/18/90 33232 04/18/90 33233 04/18/90 10297 33234 *0.00 04/18/90 e e 7 e • 10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 1e 10 20 r 22 /11 23 24 25 25 A 27 26 20 30 /t 31 32 33 34 0111 35 36 37 30 0,3 39 40 4, 42 # 43 44 45 46 ^` 47 46 40 50 51 52 f3 54 n 55 56 57 se rot 59 60 8.231963 64 67 65 67 60 70 w 71 72 ;4 ;5 . FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR. NAME VND.. * ....._ ACCOUNT._NUMBER. DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND .. LIST RAGE._.__ __ 0021 FOR 04/24/90 DATE 04/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R WILLIAM*KELLY MEALS/TRAINING CLASS 00362 001-400-2101-4312 04/03/90 POLICE INV/REF,._ _._... _—P_0...11.. __._._CNK_* AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $787.50 01217 $16.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR TOTAL****i►*************************************************************** R KIWANIS CLUB OF HERMOSA BEACH APRIL DUES/M. SCHUBACH $16.00 00380 001-400-4101-4315 00122 $40.00 04/04/90 PLANNING /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 340.00 R LA OUINTA INN 03125 001-400-2101-4316 HOTEL/K-9 DRUG TRAINING TR295 04/11/90 210005 POLICE ******************************************************************** *** VENDOR TOTAL 00534 $872.00 /TRAINING R MICHAEL*LADD COMPUTER SERV/MAR 90 MICHAEL*LADD COMPUTER SERV TO 4/12/90 $872.00 01978 001-400-1206-4201 00694 $2,025.28 027 03/26/90 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 01978 001-400-1206-4201 00695 $2,244.04 028 04/12/90 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $4,269.32 LEARNED LUMBER MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 00167 001-400-2101-4309 03/31/90 POLICE R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 03/31/90 00279 376.35 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 001-400-4204-4309 01623 $206.06 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R STEVE*LEGARE WORK GUAR REFUND R STEVE*LEGARE WORK GUAR REFUND 00734 001-210-0000-2110 83203 03/29/90 00734 001-210-0000-2110 70563 03/29/90 $282.41 03637 $1,550.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 03642 $4,550.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 10287 33235 *0.00 04/18/90 10813 33236 $0.00 04/18/90 TR295 00295 33237 $0.00 04/18/90 027 09527 33238 $0.00 04/18/90 028 09529 33238 $0.00 04/18/90 00331 $0. 00 33239 04/18/90 00331 33239 $0.00 04/18/90 83203 10561 33240 $0.00 04/18/90 70563 10560 33240 $0.00 04/18/90 11 2 3 4 6 7 0 4 • 4 0 10 nt 11 2 7 14 15 14 ii 16 10 7'J ii 23 24 25 26 27 26 29 31 32 33 34 .^. 35 .15 .17 38 39 40 41 12 ' 43 44 45 46 .-.' 47 40 49 50 -' 51 52 53 54 �. 55 56 57 58 ,.s 59 60 ei 67 r 63 64 65 67 68 71 :2 24 I^ ,5 F INANCE—' TIME 15 PAY. 1• r- CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND..LIST . ___._... FOR 04/24/90 PAGE .. _ _ _ 0022 DATE 04/19/90 VND #... ACCOUNT .NUMBER _TRN..#_ --------_AMOUNT- .. INV/REF._____.._. DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *******************►***********************************p•***** $6,100. 00 .“.11 -BLUEPRINT ,,.rBLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. 00077 001-400-3104-4309 00456 $21.51 . CHARGES/MARCH 90 48169 03/31/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS .••ENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LOS ANGELES TIMES 00213 001-400-1203-4201 00667 EMPLOYMENT ADS/MAR 90 12201 03/31/90 PERSONNEL $21.51 248169 00333 $0.00 $875.88 13-012201 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $875.88 R LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. 00079 001-400-2101-4187 00336 $39.50 MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 44851 03/31/90 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MAIN ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. MISC CHARGES/APRIL 90 $39.50 00426 105-400-2601-4309 00594 $253.00 04/15/90 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 01859 04/15/90 01859 04/15/90 01859 04/15/90 01859 04/15/90 01859 04/15/90 001-400-1212-4188 01714 EMP BENEFITS 105-400-2601-4188 00938 STREET LIGHTING 110-400-3301-4188 00878 VEH PKG DIST 110-400-3302-4188 01149 PARKING ENF 145-400-3401-4188 00887 DIAL A RIDE 01859 145-400-3402-4188 00889 04/15/90 ESEA $253.00 $797.60 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $31.11 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.66 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $136.70 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $4.30 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.45 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00372 $0. 00 33241 04/18/90 33242 04/18/90 244851 00334 33243 $0.00 04/18/90 00435 $0.00 00041 $0. 00 00041 $0. 00 00041 $0.00 00041 $0.00 00041 $0.00 00041 $0.00 33244 04/18/90 33245 04/18/90 33245 04/18/90 33245 04/18/90 33245 04/18/90 33245 04/18/90 33245 04/18/90 23 4 e e 7 s 9 ,0 11 ,2 ,4 ,s ,8 15 ,8 ,v 20 A A 221 22 074 23 24 25 2811 27 23 2v I 31 32 33+ 34 MI 35 38 37 38 A 39 40 41 42 91,11 43 45 .s` 4e'7 47 49 413 50 MI 5, 52 33` 34'1 se se 87 3e� sv GO 3c 62 40 83 64 TS; 66* 67 e8 as 70 71 72 74 75 A FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR..NAME DESCRIPTION MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/24/90 , .... ACCOUNT._NUMBER _.TRIC.#_. ____.___.__AMOUNT. DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 01859 145-400-3403-4188 00262 04/15/90 BUS PASS SUBSDY 01859 155-400-2102-4188 00497 04/15/90 CROSSING GUARD 01859 160-400-3102-4188 00880 04/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN 01859 705-400-1209-4188 00250 04/15/90 LIABILITY INS 01859 705-400-1217-4188 00249 04/15/90 WORKERS COMP $0.46 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS • $1.92 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $18. 44 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.92 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $3.84 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $998.40 MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES. INC. LEASE PMT/MAY 1990 R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES. INC. LEASE PMT/MAY 1990 02272 001-400-2101-6900 04/15/90 POLICE 02272 001-400-2101-6900 04/15/90 POLICE 00501 $1,233.52 /LEASE PAYMENTS 00502 $1.072.55 /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * * * * R MARTIN J. *MAYER BLDG LEGAL SERV/MAR 90 VENDOR TOTAL 32. 306. 07 03220 001-400-1132-4201 00044 31,347.50 03/31/90 CTY PROSECUTOR /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ******************************************************************** R MERCED COLLEGE TUITION/T. JOHNSON VENDOR TOTAL 03352 001-400-2101-4313 04/02/90 POLICE $1,347.50 00266 $10.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE. STC ******************************************************************** R KIM*MITCHELL MEALS/HOTEL/TRAINING 00522 001-400-2101-4312 04/15/90 POLICE $10. 00 01212 $406.50 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MOFFATT & NICHOL ENGINEERS. INC PIER REPAIRS/JUNE 89 1649 02666 001-202-0000-2020 03/15/90 00984 $406.50 $17,743.37 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DATE 04/19/90 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00041 $0.00 00041 $0.00 00041 $0.00 00041 $0. 00 33245 04/18/90 33245 04/18/90 33245 04/18/90 33245 04/18/90 00041 33245 $0.00 04/18/90 00056 33246 $0.00 04/18/90 00059 33246 $0.00 04/18/90 10376 33247 $0.00 04/18/90 10286 33248 $0.00 04/18/90 10281 33249 $0.00 04/18/90 1649 11101 33250 $0.00 04/18/90 e 7 s 0 2 4 10 ,8 10 20 72 23 24 25 25 27 0 ii. 2: 29 3';a! 31 3. 3 3 3 4 4. 44 15 4 49 5: 51 52 54 55 56 37 50 59 60 ei 02 e3 04 (17 1311 A A 0 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR. NAME DESCRIPTION MOFFATT & NICHOL ENGINEERS, INC PIER REPAIRS/JUNE 89 1649 R MOFFATT & NICHOL ENGINEERS, INC PIER REPAIRS/JULY 89 1687 MOFFATT & NICHOL ENGINEERS, INC PIER REPAIRS/AUG-SEP 89 1760 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST ...- FOR 04/24/90 ACCOUNT..NUMBER DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02666 001-400-8614-4201 00065 03/15/90 CIP 88-614 02666 001-400-8614-4201 00066 03/15/90 CIP 88-614 02666 001-400-8614-4201 00067 03/15/90 CIP 88-614 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 41, 089. 37CR /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $1,476.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $9,570.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT CATHY*MORROW ZONE CHANGE NOTICES $27,700.00 03204 001-400-4101-4305 00428 4200.00 04/05/90 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** MYERS STEVENS & COMPANY CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 4200. 00 00091 001-400-1212-4188 01715 4772.20 04/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** NATIONAL CAREER WORKSHOPS SEMINAR REG/M. SMALLMAN 3-284 R NATIONAL CAREER WORKSHOPS SEMINAR REG/S. DURAN 3-284 ******************************************************************** *** VENDOR TOTAL *772. 20 02203 001-400-1202-4316 00296 459.00 04/16/90 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING 02203 001-400-1202-4316 00297 *59.00 04/16/90 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING R OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE LEGAL SERV/MARCH 90 R OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE LEGAL SERV/MARCH 90 R OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE LEGAL SERV/MARCH 90 . PAGE ____0024____ DATE 04/19/90 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 1649 11101 33250 *0.00 04/18/90 1687 11101 33250 &0.00 04/18/90 1760 11101 33250 40.00 04/18/90 10814 33251 40.00 04/18/90 00013 33252 40.00 04/18/90 110-88013-284 00119 $0.00 110-88013-284 00119 30. 00 4118. 00 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00570 47,870.50 03/31/90 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 02B92 001-400-1131-4201 00571 42,762.50 03/31/90 420001 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 02892 705-400-1209-4201 00126 475.00 ' 03/31/90 LIABILITY INS- /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 $10,708.00 00235 001-400-1212-4188 01704 41,234.13 04/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 09160 $0.00 09160 $0.00 33253 04/18/90 33253 04/18/90 33254 04/18/90 33254 04/18/90 09160 33254 30.00 04/18/90 00019 33255 30.00 04/18/90 23 4 5 6 7 5 0 10 11 12 13 14 15 1e 10 l0 20 221 22 23 24 A 4 25 25 " 27 25 30 /R 31 32 33 34 Ill 35 36 37 38 A 30 40 41 42 Al 43 44 45 40 47 45 40 00 51 02 53 54 et 55 5e 913,1 50 60 01 02 q 83 44 89• 67 Igo 7.11 ,c 4• FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R • ORAL HEALTH SERVICES CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST. FOR 04/24/90 VND #. ACCOUNT NUMBER ..TRIC.#. .._._______AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00235 105-400-2601-4188 00933 04/15/90 STREET LIGHTING 00235 110-400-3301-4188 00873 04/15/90 VEH PKG DIST 00235 110-400-3302-4188 01143 04/15/90 PARKING ENF 00235 145-400-3401-4188 00880 04/15/90 DIAL A RIDE 00235 145-400-3402-4188 00882 04/15/90 ESEA 00235 155-400-2102-4188 00493 04/15/90 CROSSING GUARD 00235 160-400-3102-4188 00875 04/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************tea****************** R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 00575 001-400-1212-4188 01705 04/15/90 EMP BENEFITS 00575 105-400-2601-4188 00934 04/15/90 STREET LIGHTING 00575 110-400-3301-4188 00874 04/15/90 VEH PKG DIST 00575 110-400-3302-4188 01144 04/15/90 PARKING ENF 00575 145-400-3401-4188 00881 04/15/90 DIAL A RIDE 00575 145-400-3402-4188 00883 04/15/90 ESEA 00575 145-400-3403-4188 00259 04/15/90 BUS PASS SUBSDY $67.12 /EMPLOYEE DENEFITS $1.44 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $313.79 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $7.54 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2.45 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $5.21 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $32.96 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DATE 04/19/90 INV/REF....._....__ . ..___PO # _._ _ _ CHK..# AMOUNT UNENC DATE. EXP **** $1,664.64 $16.940.00 /EMPLOYEE DENEFITS $709.52 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $12.04 /EMPLOYEE DENEFITS $2,828.91 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $82.50 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $27.46 /EMPLOYEE DENEFITS $7.22 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00019 33255 $0.00 04/18/90 00019 33255 $0.00 04/18/90 00019 33255 $0.00 04/18/90 00019 33255 $0.00 04/18/90 00019 33255 $0.00 04/18/90 00019 33255 $0.00 04/18/90 00019 33255 $0.00 04/18/90 00016 33256 $0.00 04/18/90 00016 $0.00 00016 $0.00 33256 04/18/90 33256 04/18/90 00016 33256 $0.00 04/18/90 00016 33256 $0.00 04/18/90 00016 33256 $0.00 04/18/90 00016 33256 $0.00 04/18/90 • • • ..FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAX VENDOR. NAME DESCRIPTION R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH R PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH PACIFICARE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 INS/MAY 90 INS/MAY 90 INS/MAY 90 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND .LIST. FOR 04/24/90 ACCOUNT .NUMBER DATE INVC ,PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00575 155-400-2102-4188 00494 04/15/90 CROSSING GUARD 00575 160-400-3102-4188 . 00876 04/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN 00575 705-400-1209-4188 00244 04/15/90 LIABILITY INS 00575 705-400-1217-4188 00243 04/15/90 WORKERS COMP $48.06 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $325. 06 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $87.50 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $87. 50 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************************** R PAGENET $21.155.77 02487 001-400-1201-4201 00084 $11.50 PAGING SERV/APRIL 90 04/01/90 CITY MANAGER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R PAGENET 02487 001-400-2101-4307 00213 $150.50 PAGING SERV/APRIL 90 04/01/90 POLICE /RADIO MAINTENANCE R PAGENET ' 02487 001-400-2401-4201 00233 $11.50 PAGING SERV/APRIL 90 04/01/90 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $173.50 R PAK WEST MISC CHARGES/MARCH 90 00519 001-400-4204-4309 01621 $63.84 93761 03/31/90 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $63.84 * * * R MR.*PAZZUOLI WORK GUAR REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 03351 001-210-0000-2110 03636 83233 03/29/90 $75. 00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE ******************************************************************** $75.00 R PHOENIX GROUP COMPUTER SERV/CITATIONS 40-00 R PHOENIX GROUP COMPUTER SUPP/APR-JUN 90 15-00 02530 04/04/90 02530 04/01/90 001-400-1206-4201 00696 DATA PROCESSING 001-400-1206-4201 00697 DATA PROCESSING PAGE .____0026__ DATE 04/19/90 _PO #. ____CHK._# AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00016 33256 $0.00 04/18/90 00016 33256 $0.00 04/18/90 00016 33256 $0.00 04/18/90 00016 33256 $0.00 04/18/90 00059 $0. 00 00059 $0.00 00059 $0.00 693761 00440 $0.00 33257 04/18/90 33257 04/18/90 33257 04/18/90 33258 04/18/90 83233 10559 33259 $0.00 04/18/90 $210.00 4740-00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $435.00 4715-00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 09526 $0.00 00071 $0.00 33260 04/18/90 33260 04/18/90 23 6 0 0 1 12 3 43 6 • • • l9. to 20 �1 22. z3 24 25 26. 27 28 3u • 31 32 33 34. 35 36 38 • 30 40 41 42. 43 44 43 46 • a7 48 49 50 • 51 52 51 4. 55 58 5' 56 • so 60 ni 02 • 63 64 65 66. e7 50 4n ln. 71 72 4 • 7S • .._FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR. NAME DESCRIPTION PHOENIX GROUP OUT—OF—STATE CITES/MAR90 49-00 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND. LIST PAGE 0027 FOR 04/24/90 1 DATE 04/19/90 VND..M.-..__ ACCOUNT..NUMBER _TRN._*_. ____AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ 4 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02530 110-300-0000-3302 04/11/90 INV/REF__ _ _ _.. _ _PO- N __._._CNK—M- AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 32809 $780.48 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** POSTMASTER P. O. BOX RENTAL 00097 001-400-2101-4305 01225 307 04/16/90 POLICE $1,425.48 *72. 00 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. CTY SHARE/AUTO—HOME/MAY R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. CTY SHARE/AUTO—HOME/MAY PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. CTY SHARE/AUTO—HOME/MAY R PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. CTY SHARE/AUTO—HOME/MAY PRINCIPAL CASUALTY INS. CO. CTY SHARE/AUTO—HOME/MAY $72.00 00585 001-400-1212-4188 01706 $54.75 04/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00585 110-400-3301-4188 00875 *0.50 04/15/90 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00585 110-400-3302-4188 01145 *4.25 04/15/90 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00585 705-400-1209-4188 00245 *1.25 04/15/90 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00585 705-400-1217-4188 00244 *1.25 04/15/90 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** PROF COMMUNICATIONS INSTALLERS MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 R PROF COMMUNICATIONS INSTALLERS MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 $62.00 02526 001-400-4205-4311 00177 *80.09 03/31/90 EQUIP SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 02526 001-400-6101-4311 03/31/90 PARKS 00214 $160.18 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $240.27 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO MISC. CHARGES/MAR 1990 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO MISC. CHARGES/MAR 1990 00173 001-400-2101-4305 01230 03/31/90 POLICE 00173 001-400-2101-4306 00788 03/31/90 POLICE $49.15 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *219. 40 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 4749-00 00077 33260 *0.00 04/18/90 307 10781 33261 $0.00 04/18/90 00038 33262 $0.00 04/18/90 00038 33262 *0.00 04/18/90 00038 33262 $0.00 04/18/90 00038 33262 $0.00 04/18/90 00038 33262 *0.00 04/18/90 00377 33263 *0.00 04/18/90 00377 $0.00 33263 04/18/90 00344 33264 *0.00 04/18/90 00344 33264 $0.00 04/18/90 • 3 • 6 e 7 e ,0 a 5 8 ,7 ,6 P 20 2, 22 23 24 25 • 410 28 • 27 2P 3- 3, 3 3 a 47 •6 5, 52 5 56 50 60 823 0• CS 65 67 68 f t1 70 77. 75 • • • • • . FINANCE—SEA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR. NAME DESCRIPTION R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO MISC. CHARGES/MAR 1990 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO MISC. CHARGES/MAR 1990 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND..LIST._ FOR 04/24/90 VND.. M . __..._ ACCOUNT._NUMBER --.._TRN_.*_ DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT 00173 001-400-2201-4305 03/31/90 FIRE 00173 03/31/90 PAGE DATE 04/19/90 a S 3 9 4 6 • s , 00344 33264 ° $0.00 04/18/90 17• 00344 33264 $0.00 04/18/90 _AMOUNT _.___..__INV/REF _PO M UAL.* DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00347 $34.99 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 001-400-3103-4309 00980 ST MAINTENANCE $22.47 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $326.01 R RMRS SYSTEMS 00300 001-400-1208-4305 00746 $2,000.00 POSTAGE METER RESET 96518 04/10/90 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,000.00 R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES ENGRG SERV/FEB—MAR 90 90204 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 10596518 08025 33265 $0.00 04/18/90 01578 001-400-3104-4201 00054 $962.50 90204 11129 04/01/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 R SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY STREET SIGNS $962.50 00021 001-400-3104-5499 00049 $83.05 37307 04/10/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /NON—CAPITALIZED ASSETS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $83.05 OFCR LARRY*SAVOY MEALS/LEGAL UPDATE CLASS 00628 001-400-2101-4312 04/04/90 POLICE 01218 $24.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SUSAN*SAXE—CLIFFORD,PH D PSYCH EVALUATION/P.D. 325-4 $24.00 00839 001-400-1203-4320 00308 $275.00 03/25/90 PERSONNEL /PRE—EMPLOYMENT EXAMS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $275.00 R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. MISC CHARGES/MARCH 90 SINCLAIR PAINT CO. MISC CHARGES/MARCH 90 01399 001-400-3104-4309 00457 03/31/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY 01399 001-400-4204-4309 01622 03/31/90 BLDG MAINT $45.32 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $44.67 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 37307 10674 $83.06 0-0325-4 33266 04/18/90 33267 04/18/90 10291 33268 $0.00 04/18/90 10916 33269 $0.00 04/18/90 00346 $0.00 00346 $0.00 33270 04/18/90 33270 04/18/90 12 3 1. • 16 16 17 Ie •• to 2,3 zl zz • 23 24 27 ze 3z 33 3t. 77 36 37 39 . 3v 40 41 72 • 43 ae A6 • Q 52 53 54 4055 56 57 96 • S° so ai e2 63 64 e agh67 66 5A 70 71 72 73 7a • 77 40 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR. NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND. LIST.. _ _... FOR 04/24/90 VND 4 ... . ACCOUNT .NUMBER _ TRN- .* _ _________AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************************+r********** R SIR SPEEDY ANIMAL IMPOUND FORMS 389.99 00361 001-400-2401-4305 00156 $127.77 11227 04/04/90 ANIMAL CONTROL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES SIR SPEEDY CHILDRENS' THEATRE FLYER 11208 00361 001-400-4601-4302 00079 04/09/90 $155.19 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************* WILLIAM*SLATER ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 03349 001-210-0000-2110 95782 03/29/90 282.96 DATE Q-- DATE 04/19/90 * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 11227 09995 $127.77 11208 10455 *144. 52 03639 *50.00 95782 10554 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 45006 $50. 00 00114 001-400-1101-4305 00306 *73.48 03/31/90 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** CLARK*SNODGRASS ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 03350 001-210-0000-2110 94281 03/29/90 $73.48 33271 04/18/90 33271 04/18/90 33272 04/18/90 245006 00347 33273 *0.00 04/18/90 03638 *50.00 94281 10555 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 /5642 00113 001-400-2101-4309 03/31/90 POLICE $50. 00 00278 *35.23 6210/5642 00348 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC CONTRACT PAYMENT/FY89-90 $35.23 00779 001-400-4601-4201 00540 $3.000.00 04/09/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL PRISONER SERV/MARCH 90 $3. 000. 00 10475 *0. 00 33276 04/18/90 00107 001-400-2101-4201 00555 *315.10 10772 33277 03/29/90 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR. NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH . DEMAND LIST_ .._.. FOR 04/24/90 PAGE-. __._ _0030. - DATE 04/19/90 VND_*__.. _. ACCOUNI .NUMBER...-TRN__N.__._-_____._AMOUNT.......... .....INV/REF_ DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $315.10 R SOUTH BAY JUVENILE DIVERSION CONTRACT PMT/JAN. 90 01731 140-400-4705-4201 00008 $322.80 03/13/90 JUVENILE DIVSN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************+t************* $322.80 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 110-300-0000-3302 32807 $12,066.00 CITE SURCHARGE/MAR 90 03/31/90 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $12,066.00 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITATION COURT BAIL 04/16/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 00400 110-300-0000-3302 32808 $64.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING ------------- -_.. - $64.00 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS 00018 MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 03/31/90 SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 00018 03/31/90 001-400-2201-4309 00859 FIRE 001-400-3103-4309 00979 ST MAINTENANCE $43.70 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $13.95 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R SOUTH BAY WELDERS 00018 001-400-3104-4309 00459 $13.95 MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 03/31/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $71.60 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MAR 90 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MAR 90 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MAR 90 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MAR 90 00159 001-400-3101-4303 00089 03/31/90 MEDIANS 00159 001-400-3104-4303 00046 03/31/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00378 03/31/90 BLDG MAINT 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00302 03/31/90 PARKS $41.35 /UTILITIES $545.13 /UTILITIES $4,282.25 /UTILITIES $1, 124. 99 /UTILITIES 00118 33279 $0.00 04/18/90 09998 33280 $0.00 04/18/90 00351 33281 $0.00 04/18/90 00351 33281 $0.00 04/18/90 00351 33281 $0.00 04/18/90 00352 $0.00 00352 $0.00 00352 $0.00 00352 $0.00 33282 04/18/90 33282 04/18/90 33282 04/18/90 33282 04/18/90 • _._.FINANCE-SFA340. TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR__NAME DESCRIPTION SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MAR 90 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MAR 90 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND . LISI__ ...._ . FOR 04/24/90 VND_N.....-_ DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00237 $227.98 03/31/90 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00133 $53.53 03/31/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************************************+r****** SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ST LIGHT BILLS/MARCH 90 RAGE_ 0031 DATE 04/19/90 _.INV/REF M..CHE_M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $6,275.23 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00238 $13.581.13 03/31/90 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. GAS BILLINGS/MARCH 90 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00377 03/31/90 BLDG MAINT $13,581.13 $1,153.29 /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,153.29 R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO SWEEPING SERV/MARCH 90 2501 SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO SWEEPING SERV/MARCH 90 2501 00115 03/31/90 00115 03/31/90 001-400-3103-4201 00269 ST MAINTENANCE 110-400-3301-4201 00257 VEH PKG DIST $2,548.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $2,941.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $5,489.00 R STATE OF CALIFORNIA TUITION/K. MITCHELL 00951 001-400-2101-4312 03/26/90 POLICE 01213 $150.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MILLIE G.*STOCKTON REFUND SPRING CLASS FEE 91934 03339 001-300-0000-3826 00851 04/05/90 $150.00 $25.00 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $25.00 R SUBTEC ZONE CHANGE NOTICES 02962 001-400-4101-4305 00427 $185.00 03/29/90 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 2 3 7 s 00352 33282 $0.00 04/18/90 00352 33282 $0.00 04/18/90 00013 40.00 00353 40.00 2501 00029 40.00 2501 00029 40.00 33283 04/18/90 33284 04/18/90 33285 04/18/90 33285 04/18/90 10282 33286 $0.00 04/18/90 91934 10473 40.00 33287 04/18/90 08694 33288 $150.00 04/18/90 • 0 2 45 16 ,5 9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2. 2 3 31 • A n 3• 3 3 n 3 3. PN 3 4. 4� 4 4 15 4. /•% 4 4' 5. 5, 52 53 54 • 55 56 57 50 5• 50 01 62 63 64 65 66 '. 57 55 09 70 71 72 74 75 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST_ FOR04/24/90 VND.. M . _. __ ACCOUNI..NUMBER _IRN__O_. _________AMOUNT _ DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. MOVIE RENTALS/EASTER 5/695 _ PAGE . _. _ _ _ 0032 DATE 04/19/90 .INV/REF PO4. _C1411...* AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $185. 00 03158 001-400-4601-4308 00281 $366.50 03/28/90 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $366.50 * * * R HELEN*TADDEI CITE PAYMENT REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 03344 110-300-0000-3302 93550 04/09/90 32806 $46. 00 /COURT FINES/PARKING ******************************************************************** R THEATRE ARTS CONSERVATORY, INC REFUND COND USE PERMIT 83119 03340 001-300-0000-3812 00208 04/05/90 $46. 00 485855/695 10401 $366. 60 $320.00 /CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY MISC CHARGES/MARCH 90 4130H $320. 00 00124 160-400-3102-4309 00472 $93.00 03/31/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $93.00 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 4• 00240 001-400-1212-4188 01708 $217.59 04/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 105-400-2601-4188 00936 $1.52 04/15/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 04/15/90 00240 04/15/90 145-400-3401-4188 00883 $0.94 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 145-400-3402-4188 00885 $0.38 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 160-400-3102-4188 00878 $3.04 04/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 705-400-1209-4188 00247 $3.17 04/15/90 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 33289 04/18/90 793550 09997 33290 $0.00 04/19/90 83119 10816 $0. 00 33291 04/18/90 14130H 00357 33292 $0.00 04/18/90 00029 $0. 00 00029 $0. 00 00029 $0. 00 00029 $0. 00 00029 $0. 00. 00029 $0. 00 33293 04/18/90 33293 04/18/90 33293 04/18/90 33293 04/18/90 33293 04/18/90 33293 04/18/90 2 "--"S a 4 6 6 7 e a 10 4 6 17 15 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 31 3 41 45 4 47 45 49 50 51 77 54 55 56 57 561—• 59 60 61 62 63 64 66 67 60 "4 10 71 72 74 75 "8 I, • 010 _.FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 . PAY VENDOR. NAME DESCRIPTION TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND.. LIST PAGE 0031 FOR 04/24/90 DATE 04/19/90 VND_M__.__ ACCOUNI._NUMBER..._..__7RNJ!___ _____AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ S ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00240 705-400-1217-4188 00246 04/15/90 WORKERS COMP $3. 17 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS • • INV/REF PO4._____CNLM 4' AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $229.81 TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/MAR 90 00123 001-400-2101-4309 00280 03/31/90 POLICE 00123 001-400-2201-4309 00858 03/31/90 FIRE 00123 001-400-3101-4309 00060 03/31/90 MEDIANS 00123 001-400-3103-4309 00978 03/31/90 ST MAINTENANCE 00123 001-400-3104-4309 00458 03/31/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00123 001-400-4204-4309 01624 03/31/90 BLDG MAINT 00123 001-400-4205-4309 00455 03/31/90 EQUIP SERVICE 00123 001-400-6101-4309 00849 03/31/90 PARKS 00123 03/31/90 00123 03/31/90 00123 03/31/90 105-400-2601-4309 00596 STREET LIGHTING 110-400-3302-4309 00670 PARKING ENF 160-400-3102-4309 00473 SEWER/ST DRAIN $49. 94 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $13.81 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $78. 88 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $55. 20 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $206. 23 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $275. 16 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $7. 09 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $89.38 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $124. 79 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $16. 19 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $38. 55 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $955.22 JOHN M.*TSAO MD. INC. 03348 001-400-1203-4320 00309 $140.00 RETURN TO WORK PHYSICAL 51898 04/04/90 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS 00029 33293 $0.00 04/18/90 00358 $0. 00 00358 $0.00 33294 04/18/90 33294 04/18/90 00358 33294 $0.00 04/18/90 00358 33294 $0.00 04/18/90 00358 33294 $0.00 04/18/90 33294 04/18/90 00358 $0. 00 00358 33294 41 $0.00 04/18/90 00358 33294 46 $0.00 04/18/90 .7 00358 33294 $0.00 04/18/90 00358 33294 $0.00 04/18/90 00358 33294 $0.00 04/18/90 l0 12 t3 U t5 16 17 to to 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 • • • • 3. Pb 3t 3 " 3 3 3 4 Y► 51898 10917 $0.00 33295 04/18/90 5 51 52 53 54 55 56 47 C 63 64 6? 67 Cn •u 73 It :n 71 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR.. NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND..LIST........ FOR 04/24/90 ACCOUNT _NUMBER DATE INVC PROJ 11 AMOUNT_ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE 04/19/90 2 3 INV/REF. _.._..__PO M CHtL..* AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $140.00 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 * * * THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 02355 001-400-1212-4188 01710 04/15/90 EMP BENEFITS 02355 105-400-2601-4188 00937 04/15/90 STREET LIGHTING 02355 04/15/90 02355 04/15/90 110-400-3301-4188 00877 VEH PKG DIST 110-400-3302-4188 01147 PARKING ENF 02355 145-400-3401-4188 00885 04/15/90 DIAL A RIDE 02355 145-400-3402-4188 04/15/90 ESEA 00887 02355 145-400-3403-4188 00261 04/15/90 BUS PASS SUBSDY 02355 155-400-2102-4188 00496 04/15/90 CROSSING GUARD 02355 160-400-3102-4188 00879 04/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN 02355 705-400-1209-4188 00248 04/15/90 LIABILITY INS $758.52 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $24.40 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.80 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $136.00 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $4.48 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.52 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.48 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2.00 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $20.00 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.20 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 705-400-1217-4188 00247 $1.20 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 04/15/90 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R UNITED AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 90 $950.60 02697 001-400-1212-4188 01712 $80.00 04/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY COMPANY 01934 001-400-2201-4309 AIR—PACK REPAIR 89586 03/16/90 FIRE $80.00 00028 $0.00 00028 $0.00 00028 $0.00 33296 04/18/90 33296 04/18/90 33296 04/18/90 00028 33296 $0.00 04/18/90 00028 33296 $0.00 04/18/90 00028 33296 $0.00 04/18/90 00028 33296 $0.00 04/18/90 00028 33296 $0.00 04/18/90 00028 33296 $0.00 04/18/90 00028 33296 $0.00 04/18/90 00028 33296 $0.00 04/18/90 00065 33297 $0.00 04/18/90 00857 $121.75 2289586 08390 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $121.74 33298 04/18/90 e 7 8 • 10 11 12 4 15 16 17 15 10 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2fl 30 31 32 34 35 36 37 30 30 40 4, 42 43 44 45 46 47 46 49 50 5, S2 5.3 54 "5 55 58 57 55 1141 59 bo ci 62A, 63 64 65 66m 67 66 6G 70� 71 72 74 • 75 • • ._FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:33:50 PAY VENDOR_.NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH .DEMAND..LIST PAGE 003 FOR 04/24/90 DATE 04/19/90 VND_ M ....... ACCOUNT _NUMBER _ _7RN..M _ ___AMOUNT .... . INV/REF._____.._.. __PO ..N.. -__-CHK-*__._ DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $121.75 * * * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R J. 8.*WARD & COMPANY 02507 705-400-1209-4201 00127 $3.850.00 00042 33299 CONTRACT PMT/APR-JUN 90 04/02/90 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/18/90 VENDOR TOTAL #*******####*#########*#############**#**#*****************#*#***#** J. F. *WEBER. CONSULTANT AUDIT/ALLRIGHT PARKING *3.850.00 00134 001-400-1202-4201 00207 $472.50 09292 33300 03/27/90 FINANCE ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $900.00 04/18/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $472.50 R WRAY PRINTING 00132 001-400-2101-4305 01226 $83.26 5188 10775 33301 SUBPENA FORMS/POLICE 5188 04/09/90 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 04/18/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL***********#******************************************************** $83.26 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00227 $321.83 525154586 00049 33302 LEASE PMT/APRIL 90 54586 04/02/90 GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 04/18/90 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00228 $238.72 525154585 00050 33302 LEASE PMT/APRIL 90 54585 04/02/90 GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 04/18/90 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00229 $945.93 525154099 00048 33302 LEASE PMT/APRIL 90 54099 04/02/90 GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 04/18/90 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-2201-6900 00109 $47.74 525154582 00053 33302 LEASE PMT/APRIL 90 54582 04/02/90 FIRE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 04/18/90 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-2401-6900 00061 $56.15 525154583 00051 33302 LEASE PMT/APRIL 1990 54583 04/02/90 ANIMAL CONTROL /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 04/18/90 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-4601-6900 00062 $189.65 525154584 00052 33302 LEASE PMT/APRIL 90 54584 04/02/90 COMM RESOURCES /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 04/18/90 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 110-400-3302-6900 00146 $114.40 525154583 00051 33302 LEASE PMT/APRIL 1990 54583 04/02/90 PARKING ENF /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 04/18/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,914.42 f SI 5.11 55 55 57 50 59 00 #*# PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $240. 425. 02n- iiLIO CEflTIfY THAT THE DEMANDS 011,91AIMS COVERE IE WARRANTS LISTED ON P E TCS r -INCLUSIVE OF T PANT REGISTER FOR AREACCU *** TOTAL WARRANTS##########*################*###############################*###### $902. 001. 12..0 . uNDS ARE A AILABLE FOR PAYMENT TjiEREOF: FINANCE ADMI N I ST RAT HATE ! //9/1STN i Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council April 18, 1990 City Council Meeting of April 24, 1990 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS May 8, 1990 Street Lighting District Assessment reso. approving report & setting public hearing Crossing Guards District Assessment reso. approving report & setting public hearing Sewer bond analysis, CIP 89-407 Call for bids - basketball courts CIP 89-512 Report from Cable operator regarding public access Report on results of Sixth St. storm drain cleaning Comparison of sanitary sewer design costs Criteria for sidewalk installation along suggested route to school streets Quarterly report for Capital Improvement Program Public Hearings Certification of oil drilling E.I.R. General Plan amendment for oil drilling, with resolution Text amendment to zoning code for oil drilling, with ordinance. General Plan amendment for Area 10 General Plan amendment for SE corner of Artesia and Prospect to Harper Ave. Responsible Agent Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director General Services Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Planning Director Planning Director Planning Director Planning Director Planning Director May 22, 1990 Proposed reorganization of Community Resources Department personnel allocation Power Street drainage and grading Overlay Valley/Ardmore/Prospect agreement with County CIP 88-406 Call for Bids - Sewers Target Area 4 Award of contract for audit May 24, 1990 - 6:00 p.m. Budget and Capital Improvement Program study session June 7, 1990 Second budget study session if needed June 12, 1990 Public Hearings Crossing Guard Assessment District Street Lighting Assessment District June 26, 1990 Award construction contract for basketball courts Public Hearing/Budget Adoption July 10, 1990 Public Hearing Park & Rec. Master Plan amendment to open space element July 24, 1990 Slurry sealing, call for bids CIP 89-170 Accept sidewalk repairs as complete CIP 89-142 Personnel Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Finance Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Planning Director Public Works Director Public Works Director •**************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Caltrans utility maintenance agrmt. Vehicle parking on pedestrian streets Historic Preservation Ordinance (with Land Use Element) New marquee proposal Public Works Director Public Works Director Planning Director Community Resources ***************************************************************** Initiated by Party Date City Mgr. 2/27 Air Quality Control measures City Mgr. 3/15 County audit of Parking tickets City Mgr. 4/2 Vehicle Parking District Report City Mgr. 4/10 Recycling status report 3 Planning Director Finance Director Finance Director Building Director Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 17, 1990 City Council Meeting of April 24, 1990 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS, MARCH 1990 Attached are the financial reports for March 1990. After adjust- ing property tax collections, General fund revenue would be 78% received for 75% of the year. Early revenue projections for the end of this year, prepared by departments for the 1990-92 budget suggest that overall revenue will adequately meet budgeted projections. General fund expenditures are 70% expended for 75% of the year primarily due to low capital projects expenditures at 14% of bud- geted appropriations. Preliminary department estimates for bud- get purposes suggest that we will be slightly under budget at year end. A more precise estimate of any savings will be avail- able as the budget process progresses. Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft Viki Copeland City Manager Attachments Finance Director u r - •- • -77-FINANCE-FA484 TIME 19:16:05 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE-SUMMARY FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 7-001 'GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 - • - 3100 TAXES 3101 3102 3103 3106 777773107 3108 3110 3111 3112 3113 -3114 3115 OBJECT SUBTOTAL - • /CURRENT YEAR SECURED /CURRENTYEAR UNSECURED /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS /SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL 613813 /TRANSFER TAX' /SALES TAX /CABLE TV FRANCHISE YELECTRIC"FRANCHISE- /GAS FRANCHISE /REFUSE FRANCHISE 7-77/TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY /BUSINESS LICENSE EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE PAGE--'770001-7- DATE 04/16/90 75. 07, OF YEAR COMPLETE • -UNREAL 1ZED77-7----- BALANCE 7. 2, 759, 738. 00 183 850. 00-- 50, 000. 00 60, 000. 00 -129, 087. 00- 1, 790. 309. 00 101, 678. 00 36, 641: 00 33, 973. 00 140, 000. 00 154; 278: 00 410, 000. 00 5, 849, 554. 00 3200 LICENSES AND PERMITS 0. 00 718; DT -1-. • 52 23, 331. 19 0. 00 1T, 299751 94, 093. 30 0. 00 0700 0. 00 0. 00 0. OU 31,209.62 177,935.14 1, 492, 225. 80 -185, 863: 85 53, 328. 99 48, 587. 35 82,-916776 1, 267, 512. 20 54. 0 2.013.95-101: 0-77- 3, 328. 99- 106. 6 80. 9 1, 331, 605. 58 86, 721. 99 0. 00. 0. 00 87, 869. 64 122; 893;73.- 277, 071. 80 3, 769, 085. 49 3202 /DOG LICENSES 17, 000. 00 779. 50 3203 /BICYCLE LICENSES • 300. 00 37130 3204 /BUILDING PERMITS 170, 000. 00 11, 743. 24 3205 /ELECTRIC PERMITS 38, 000. 00 2, 023. 50 3206 /PLUMBING PERMITS 30; 000.-00 --2., 033. 00 3207 /OCCUPANCY PERMITS 6 000 00 293. 00 3209/GARAGE SALES 65. 00 6. 00 3210 -/B INGO. PERMITS 100. 00 0. 00 3211 /BANNER PERMITS 1, 360. 00 100. 00 3212 /ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS 650.00 0. 00 3213 /ANIMAL -REDEMPTION FEE 3, 500:00 455. 00 3214 /AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT 390.00 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 267, 365. 00 17, 436. 24 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3301 /VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS 110, 000. 00 3303 • 77 /COURT FINES/POLICE DEPT---- - 40; 000. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 150, 000. 00 16, 806. 25 231: 85 117, 362. 39 31, 963. 00 27:812: 00- 4, 101. 00 66. 00 0. 00 764. 72 700. 00 3, 952:•00 330. 00 204, 089. 21 11, 412. 65 46, 170:24 458, 703. 42 74. 3 14, 956. 01 85. 2 361641. •00 • a: a 33, 973. 00 0. 0 52, 130. 36 62. 7 31;384:27------79. 67-- 132, 928. 20 67. 5 2.080, 468. 51 64. 4 193. 75 98. 8 68:15---77: 2 52, 637. 61 69. 0 6, 037. 00 84.1 2/188. 00..........92. 7 1* 899. 00 68. 3 1.00- 101. 5 100. oo o: o- 595. 28 56. 2 50. 00- 107. 6 4527-00L- -112. 9 60. 00 84. 6 63, 275. 79 76. 3 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY - - 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 189, 105. 00 3402 /RENTS & CONCESSIONS 1, 450. 00 3403 - • /PIER REVENUE - • --- ------- 10; 500. 00 3404 /COMM CTR LEASES 00. 000 00 3405 /COMM CTR RENTALS 47, 000. 00 3406 /COMM CTR -THEATRE - 34,000:00 3411 /OTHER FACILITIES 60, 000. 00 12, 478. 99 -57271778 17, 750. 77 85, 210. 07 24, 789. 93 37; 58121 -2-1418. 79 122, 791. 28 27, 208. 72 14,635.93 187.39 400 8, 364. 00 4, 233. 50 22f2. 50 2, 755. 50 151, 430. 86 1, 449. 23 8;333. 50 62, 848. 25 39, 734. 75 23, 030. 67 54, 607. 50 77. 4 93: 9 81.8 37, 674. 14 80. 0 0. 77 99. 9 2, 166. 50 79. 3 17, 151. 75 78. 5 7, 265. 25 84. 5 10, 969. 33 67. 7 5, 392. 50 91. 0 r/mAwos-rA484. -' TIME 19:16:05 1p:1a:o5 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION -- 001- GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 -- '--- 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY _____�____ 3412 /TENNIS COURTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE ------rzwzIsoorr-'HIGHWAY ------------o9o-oo /IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE 708, 891. oo /HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE 3.500.00 rmAwoArso'COSTS' 0: 00 /HOMEOWNER PROP TX RELIE 65'000.00 /poar 48, 000. 00 47, 323. 00 eel, 607. 00 3505 .. • 3507 • . 3509 3510 NN` on14 = = ,, = `' = r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -REVENUE' SUMMARYREPORTnoY-rUmo1 FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE pAus--0002-- DATE 04/16/90 75. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE umnsAczzso--------' BALANCE 10'000.00 1'012.00 8, 426. ao /CIGARETTE TAX OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 1.573.40 84.2 • . 0. 00 333:23--- 59 rr a�7 - 921. 66 '~. ' 164.1.14 2op� 60 ' �1, 108. 40 68 3 ' o3- -- -- --~ �p��o �p.r�p�pu �o.2no.00 61 p - 0.- 00 o/000.00 - ------ -5��n000non�o-----.' ~o.p6o.op 32, 290. 98 15, 032. ---mz �a 2 -- ""..==.u1 630, 384. 88 251, 222. 12 71. 5 �o.� . 3801 /RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION 11'000.00 1, 120. oo 3802 '---''---/SIGN nsvIsu'--- - ------'-- 900oo- -----roo�oo 3803 /ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 4, 230. 00 460 00 3806 /BOARD OF APPEALS 000 oo 0 00 3808 1ZONE-VARIANCE REVIEW • -1, 280. 00.- -960:.00 38-. /TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW 5, 400. 00 225 00 3e10 /FINAL MAP REVIEW 3, 050. oo o oo 3811 '-------/zows-cxAwns.REVIEW - -1, BOO. oo n oo 3812 /CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 23, 856. 00 1, lee. 21 3813 /PLAN CHECK FEES 3814' -----'-/pLAwmIwn/zow/wo-AppsAc 3815 /PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES 3817 /SPECIAL CURB MARKING -3818 -/POLICE 'SERVICES ----- 31319 /JAIL SERVICES 382" /TRUSTY ADMIN FEE ,. 3821 --/FINGERPRINT SERVICE c -'- 3823 � 3824 /VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES - - 3, 000 00 3825 __/puoL/c•worIos POSTING • xoo 0"3826 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES 30 650. 00 382' /LIBRARY GROUNDS m^Imr 4, 517. 00 3831 '"'"==' CuINSPECT ION ---15.000.un ---a2o-oo38-° /ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 17.616.00 o 00383" /FUMIGATION INSPECT FEE 7, 500. 00 310 20 /RETURNED CHECK CHARGE 000:oo--60: 00 3838 /SALE OF m^pS/pooLIoArIo 1.000.00 3. 60 115.000.00 8.929.02 -----'u.o90 -----'o-oo 10.000.00 481op �---`! 3, 540. 00 690. 00 83. 6 225. 00 75. 00 75 0 \ 2'z5«.««--------'ero.00---1-' ' 4, 725. 00 675. 00 87.a. 175. 00 e75. 00 71 3 r, 090:00 710. 00---------60, 5--i .'21.n1e.o1 , 2, 337. rp sn�o 78,170 67 . oa.a���oo 67.p ~ 58roo--1.a15.00 -: ••2o.o ---] -- ~^'~^.-= "^.° .. ----- 000�oo 'o oo 170. 00 130. 00 56. 6-1e.00000 -1, 574. 50 10' ~"":',= -�r13o. 25/0'200.00 1.44o 00 8, 091. 50 2' 108. 50 • _rp. 3187 00 o�00 c`n»9v./-- --- o.ono.ou---'-----2oc50---r;`~.~~ �_r'-1ou.'zv a��5 45 non "" .'3""."" 41, 087. 3" � 3'912.70 91.32.917 50 5 ^^"."" 2.550.00- .185.0o00 20.00* -------80.00-^---20.04'083'00 16.337.00 14.313.00 , no.o *51/.00 0. 00 • 100.0 10, 700. � no -------'000.00'-` - 71 o 9' 167. 50 8, 448. 50 52. 0 *a41BO 2, 858. 61 o 61coo-------- - lee. oo - : - • 76. 4 59B.55 *01 45 np.e = _-� 71 FINANCE-FA4134 TIME 19: 16: 05 .--------.--. FUND 013J DESCRIPTION 001 GENERAL FUND r rm. • • • - - r r DEPARTMENT 0000 3800 CURRENT 3839 3840 3841 3856 -- 3857• 3858 3859 3860 3861 3862 OBJECT SERVICE CHARGES /PHOTOCOPY CHARGES /AMBULANCE -TRANSPORT /POLICE TOWING /GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 7PKG PLAN'APPLICATION /TENANT REFUSE BILLING /REFUSE LIEN FEE /BOOTING RELEASE FEE /HAZARDOUS MAT PERMIT /ALARM PERMIT FEE SUBTOTAL 3900 OTHER REVENUE :3901 3902 3903 3904 3913 3955 OPERATING 3956 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT --(BY-FUNDY- PAGE - 0003 FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 75. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE -------/SALE- OF-REAL7PERS-PROP /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR /CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS /CITY OFFICES RECYCLING TRANSFERS IN /RESDL. EQUITY' TRSFR -IN - OBJECT SUBTOTAL -DEPT 0000 TOTALS -- 1, 000. 00 EL 500. 00 26, 500. 00 900. 00 960: 00 200. 00 500. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 1, 000. 00 376, 644. 00 1, 061, 669. 00 500. 00 500. 00 500. 00 64. 00 83. 15 ---233: 9I 1, 890. 00 0. 00 O. DU 10. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 120. 00 ----34, 92280 809. 40 4; 350:77 17, 780. 00 450. 00 640. 00 180. 00 1, 280. 28- 0. 00 - 0. 00 1, 000. 00 260; 986. 55 6, 41-D. (..) 112. 76 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 654, 039. 00 138, 347. 08 118. 836. 00 --------- 9, 903-. 00 2, 836, 108.00 154, 772. 84 1. 063;-(379-. 14 17, 507. 06 7, 070. 73 -1;742. 63. 81 1, 238, 997. 72 -89, 127. 00 2, 417, 5813. 23 10, 793, 333:00 490;072.50-777627137. 00 190. 60 BO. 9 4, 149. 23 51. 1 8. 720. 00 67. 0 450. 00 50. 0 32000 66. 6 20. 00 90. 0 1, 780. 28 256. 0 0. 00 - 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 100t 0 107,-657: 45 71. 4 j_4[: 14=-100. '1 17, 007. 06- 3501. 4 6. 570. 73- 1414. 1 242777--348:5 0. 19 99. 7 415, 041. 28 -74. 9 ----- 29, 709. 00 75. 0 418. 519. 77 85. 2 3, 030754;5700 -- FUND TOTAL 10, 793, 333. 00 490, 072. 50 7, 762, 787. 00 3, 030, 546. 00 71. 9 - • J! 7. 71 L. • S t. • 'I. I • I n • r- I FINANCE-FA484 TIME 19:16:05 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3101 3103 OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ---------REVENUE-SUMMARY-REPORT-(BY i-uND) FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 /CURRENT YEAR SECURED ---/PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 3400 USE OF MONEY &-PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL EST REV DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED -- MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7. 322. 094. 00 0. 00 26, 000. 00 348, 094. 00 0. 00 81, 550. 00 81, 550. 00 194, 735. 42 127, 358. 58 5; 356. 83- I 31, 356. 83• • 189, 378. 59 158, 715. 41 9., 943. 35 9, 943. 35 60. 4 20.6 54. 4 73, 209. 50 8, 340. 50 89. 7 73, 209. 50 8, 340. 50 89. 7 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 /OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 492.000.00 492. 00 O. 00 100.0 • OBJECT SUBTOTAL -- - -- ' . __ - --- - ---- -- 492. 00 ------ ------ ---0. 00 492. 00 -O. 00 - - 100. 0 - - 9, 943. 35 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 430, 136. 00 263, 080. 09 167, 055. 91 61. 1 FUND TOTAL 430, 136:00 -9; 943735' 263, 080. 09 I67;055 -I 91 61:1 o• 0 2 • 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH .. -Fzw^wos-n^«o4 • ' REVENUE- SUMMARY REPORT -(BY-romo1-------- ----' ---p�o�---oou�-- . TIME 19: 16: 05 FROM 03r01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 75oz OF YEAR COMPLETE �TO DATE FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR«wns�c�zso -- - --- BALANCE z 110 PARKING FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 | - r 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES - , 3302 /COURT FINES/PARKING I.4or.oao.00 125, 589. 56 989, 739. 94 «or ooa 06 69 3 427, 568. 00 125.589 -- '~9; '~'.-- °3''"^8."" *v. 3 /.. 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 -/INTEREST-INCOME-----''--- ---zs,00r:ou 5T5. 6-5 9, 969717 rn 087.-83-7 --- 43.:2-77- ro4oz /PARKING LOT RENTAL 18.792.00 I. 606. oa 15, 391. 94 o'4uo 06 81 9 3409 /LOT 13 22.990.00 1, 915. e4 17, 242. 56 5. 747. 44 75 0 3413 ' ----/vpo LEASE -�-� - ru.000.00------4,roz'5p 51;o77oo'-'-'19'92n oo - 72 9 ..•onJsor SUBTOTAL 134.e39.00 8, 771 16 93.680.87 41'1oo 13 69 4 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES'-- ------'-'-'----- _ - _-'_--- ID 3842 3843 r�.�o� 51, 734. 503, 017. 12 1�9�� 71 o _ _ /PARKING PERMITS: ANNUAL �eo.000�oo ro.00ron 140, 031uo o«'p�� 00 75 6 ' ' 0000 - ------/o�z�vp�nxzwo PERMITS -'- 1, 000..00 ono 890: 00 ---''-���o no---�o9n---- MN / 3a*5 /VPD LOT PERMITS/DAILY a.000.00 750. 31 6, 304. 54 7.a45on � 'apn 46 ro 8 2, 354. 95 ra. 4|_ 3846 3847 /VPD LOT PERMITS/MONTHLY ---/vALIoArzow STAMPS 10.000.00 1. 076. 40 oo.00000----r;.zo1�5a 19, 823. 59----2176741--9o'1 158 3 384" /DRIVEWAY PERMITS 600. 00 /an oo • 950ou 350oo- | 3849 3850/GUEST PERMITS /CONTRACTOR 'S PERMITS 900. 00 500on -20 00 6" "" 684. 00 216. 00 76 0 680. 00 '-e2o 00 45oooJscr SUBTOTAL pon000.00 134, 052. aoo.025. 30 o«e. | 3900 OTHER REVENUE -'- --- - ------ --- ---'----------_--__--'_- - -___ -'-- _- ' - r 3902 /REFUNoa/nEIMBpeEV YR 4.o30. 00 0. 00 «'229 79 o21 99. 9 3904 /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 50. 00 o 00 o 00 50 00 o 0 3955 -- /BUDGETED TRANSFERS IN -o.00n.no-'--'-----'o�oo- 3, 033. oo------ n oo - 100 u ✓ OBJECT SUBTOTAL r.o/o.00 0. 00 r.oao.rp 50. 21 pp.z DEPT 0000 •\l FUND TOTAL 0.1 '��.. o.ope.rzo.00 268.413.27 1.770.708.90 720, 011. 10 70.8 • • . . r-. ri, • FINANCE-FA484 TIME 19: 16: 05 1 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - - -REVENUE- SUMMARY- REPORT -TB FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 EST REV PAGE _ - _ 0006 --- DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED -- MONTHLY REV \'EAR TO DATE BALANCE 23, 963. 00 3, 185. 52 20, 900. 34 3, 062. 66 87. 2 23, 963. 00 "''----- 3;-185-52..____ "20; 900: 34.--- "-__ " "-- 3. 062. 66 ' 87. 2 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3501 /SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION -.. _-..---"85; 690. 00---- ---6;7787-32 3502 /SECTION- 2107 ALLOCATION 176, 184. 00 16, 011.33 3503 /SECT 2107.5 ALLOCATION 4, 000. 00 0. 00 3522 • ---"--' /TDA ARTICLE 3 (58021) • 5, 568. 00 -"0- 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 271, 442. 00 22. 789. 65 3900 OTHER REVENUE ----'-" - • 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL TOTALS 10, 000. 00 10, 000. 00 305, 405. 00 416. 66 416. 66 26, 391. 83 57, 248. 95 • 120, 470. 34 4, 000. 00 0. 00 181,719.29 8, 750. 01 8, 750. 01 211,369.64 305,405.00 26.391.83 211, 369. 64 28;441. 05 66:8 55, 713. 66 68. 3 0.00 100.0 568. 00 __. -- 0. 0 89, 722. 71 66. 9 1, 249. 99 1, 249. 99 94, 035. 36 94, 035. 36 87. 5 87. 5 69. 2 69. 2 • • 'F I tJANCE-FA484 f .: TIME 19: 16: 05 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND • DEPARTMENT 0000 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ' REVENUE' SUMMARY REPORT - (BY FUNDY-- FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 EST REV 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 2,145.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL ' 2.145.00 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3601 - ..... ' . /COUNTY -AID -TO CITIES "--' "" 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 DEPT 0000 TOTALS -2,145.00 FUND TOTAL 2, 145. 00 •, 4i • MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 237.56 "237.'56 ----C). 00 0. 00 237.-56 237.56 1, 098. 07 1, 098. 07 0. 00 _. - - . - PAGE .._`"_.0007.'._' ;' DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ' UNREALIZED.-- BALANCE NREALIZED . - -.......- BALANCE 7 1,046.93 1,046.93 -- 51. 1 51.1 0. 00----0. 0 � | -• ' A FzwAmos-pA48* TIME 19:16:05 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -nsysmos SUMMARYnsponr-M-Fowo` FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 EST REV MONTHLY REV ----'PAGE-- --000S DATE 04/16/90 75.0z OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 3100 TAXES 3116 /PARK REC FACILITY TAX 17.500.00 0.00 20,068 .00 2.568.00- 11« a OBJECT SUBTOTAL- -'� .----- - 1r.n0000-'-'-- 0.00- -20;068.00 ---�--25a8.00- 114.6 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY -- —� 3401 '-''/IwrcnsS-/INTEREST-'--- ----4e^1167.00 12.444.o^ 8e.460'39-------40r2937*39=---1e7'2'---' OBJECT SUBTOTAL 46,167.00 12,444. 02 26,460. 39 40,293. 39- 187. 2 '' 3900 OTHER REVENUE 39/0 /PARK/RECREATION IN LIEU 240.000.00 12.870.00 124,773 .00 115.227.00 51 9 3956 /RESDL EQUITY TRSFR IN 1.056.506.00 0.00 1,056,505 .60 0.40 999 OBJECT SUBTOTAL-- ' 1.296.506.00 x2.ern:oo----�r18x; 270ao' -'--��n�o�r�o -- '*��/DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1,360,173.00 25,314.02 1,287,806.99 72.366.01 94.6 FUND TOTAL-- - - - 1.360.173.00 ------25;-314.: od x.287ona': 99 - --'72, 366701-----'94c6 •1 • • • • A' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ' - F I NANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY' REPORT- . (BY -FUNDS-------- -----.-.- .. PAGE --..... .. 0009 ' ,. TIME 19:16:05 FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 75. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE I' - I UNREALIZED -- "" "-- FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 126 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3120 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /UTILITY USER TAX 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 . /INTEREST -INCOME.. - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3900 OTHER REVENUE • 3901 /SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 TOTALS FUND TOTAL 816, 508. 00 90, 190. 73 600, 553. 31 816, 508. 00 - - --..90, 190'. 73.---- 600;'553. 31 -. -31, 455. 00 31, 455. 00 11, 275. 00 0. 00 11, 275. 00 859, 238. 00 215, 954. 69 73. 5 215,954.69 73.5 ---107301.•91-- 98, 415: 13 - 26; 960: 13- 185.'7 •-- 10, 301. 91 58, 415. 13 26, 960. 13- 185. 7 0. 00 23. 13 23: 13 100, 515. 77 1 1, 274. 58 23.13 -11, 297;71 - 670, 266. 15 859, 238. 00 --1011 51-5:77---&70;-266- 15 0.42 23. 13- -22.71 99. 9 0. 0 100:2 188, 971.85 78. 0 188: 971785 --78. 0 --_ • • r ri r' I CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA484 "' ' -"REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT'-""CDY-FUNDI'-... TIME 19:16:05 FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 75.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED ---------7 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE .. ------------ 127 6:: UTILITY USER TAX FUND" DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3120 /UTILITY USER TAX OBJECT SUBTOTAL- -- 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 • --' /INTEREST"INCOME--- --- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 224, 762. 00 135, 286. 07 1, 224, 762. 00 `-' --135; 286- 07 -4, 765.00 4, 765. 00 237.31 237. 31 900, 829. 89 323, 932. 11 900, 829. 89 • " 323. 932. 11 ' .. 4, 451. 84 4, 451. 84 313 16 16 73. 5 73. 5 - 93. 4 3900 OTHER REVENUE - -- - - - - 3902 /REFUNDS/REIMD PREV YR 0.00 34. 70 34. 70 34.70- 0.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 34. 70 34. 70 34.70- 0.0 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1, 229, 527.00 135. 558.08 905. 316.43 3'24, 210.57 73.6 FUND TOTAL 1, 229. 527. 00 135, 558. 08 905, 316. 43 324, 210. 57 73. 6 • c H r. •, 1 ' FINANCE-FA484 TIME 19: 16: 05 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY ?. PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3700 INTERGOVERNMENT/FEDERAL 3713 /HOUSING"REHABILITATION 3714 /PROJECT TOUCH 3715 /CDGG ADMINISTRATION 371'6 /SO BAY FREE CLINIC 3717 /JUVENILE DIVERSION 3718 /SO BAY COALITION ALIVE 3719 ---"''/1736 HOUSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 - TOTALS - FUND TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 'REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT""TBY"-FUNDI- FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 EST REV MONTHLY REV 1, 639. 00 YEAR TO DATE 0. 00 1, 638. 00 - -- 0. 00 92, 072.-00- 7, 670. 00 12, 276. 00 4, 200. 00 3, 000. 00 253.00 2. 544. 00 122, 015. 00 0: 00 0. 00 1, 714. 00 0: 00 0. 00 253.00 --"- 0..00 1, 967. 00 123, 653. 00 -"- -1 967. 00 PAGE-. 0011 -"- DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREAL I ZED• ".. ' • --_- BALANCE 4, 695. 83 3, 057. 83- 286. 6 4, 695. 83 - 3, 057. 83-' .. - 286. 6 0. 00 -- 92: 072. 00 - 0: 0 1, 450. 00 6, 220. 00 18 9 5, 564. 00 6, 712. 00 45. 3 1, 050. 00 3, 150. 00 .... 25. 0 O. 00 3, 000. 00 0. 0 253. 00 0. 00 100. 0 2, 544. 00 • • 0. 00 • 100. 0 10, 961. 00 11 1, 154. 00 8. 9 i5, 556: 83 -109;096. 17--- 12. 5 123, 653. 00 1, 967. 00 15, 556. 83 108, 096. 17 12. 5 FINANCE-FA484 TIME 19: 16: 05 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3117 /PROPOSITION A TRANSIT 3121 SUBREGNL INCENTIVE FUNDS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3400 USE OF MONEY &'PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT- rBY-FUNDI-- FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 EST REV 200, 000. 00 16, 331. 00- 216, 331. 00 MONTHLY REV YEAR ,TO DATE 22, 086. 00 22, 086. 00 PAGE - 0012 - - DATE 04/16/90 75. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 151, 680. 00 48, 320. 00 0.00- -"- -"' 16,331.00- 151, 680. 00 64, 651.00 17, 463. 00 17, 463. 00 2, 631. 02 2, 631. 02 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3854 /FARES, DIAL A RIDE 7, 800. 00 0. 00 3855 /BUS PASSES... - 4, 000. 00 .--'---'555:' 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL' 11, 1300. 00 555. 00 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 /REFUNDS/REIMD PREV YR 0.00 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 340.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 340. 00' --- DEPT 0000 TOTALS 19, 221. 04 19, 221. 04 2, 472. 85 4, 633. 00 7, 105. 95 0. 00 0. 00 245, 934. 00 25, 272. 02 4, 903. 13 340. 00 5, 243. 13 183, 250. 02 FUND TOTAL 245, 934.'00'__'- 25; 272:02 75. 8 0.0 70. 1 1, 758. 04- 110. 0 1, 758. 04- 110. 0 • 5, 327. 15 31. 7 633. 00_'-'- - 115.8 4, 694. 15 60. 2 4, 903. 13- 0. 0 0. 00 100. 0 -- 4; 903: 13=' -1542. 0- 62, - 62, 683. 98 74. 5 183; 250. 02 -62, 683: 98 ... 74. 5 • • • • • r r • • FINANCE-FA484 TIME 19: 16:05 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY'FUND1- FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 -- .. PAGE 0013 DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED - FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 150 GRANT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 • 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3, 340. 00 0. 00 1, 886. 52 3, 340. 00 - - 0. 00 1, 886. 52 1, 453. 48 56. 4 -1, 453. 49 ' .'... 56.4 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3517 • /OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFET " 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -- -0. 00 - -- 0. 0 3528 /PER CAPITA GRANT 58, 000..00 0. 00 0. 00 58, 000. 00 0. 0 3529 /WILDLIFE GRANT 20.204.00 0. 00 0.00 20.204. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 78, 204. 00 -" " " - 0. 00--- - - • 0. 00 • 78. 204. 00 0. 0 3700 INTERGOVERNMENT/FEDERAL 3701 /FEDERAL AID URBAN 3712 /FED EMERG MGMT AGENCY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 200, 000. 00 "" '" 0-00 -381999. 50 89, 738. 00 0. 00 0. 00 289, 738. 00 0. 00 38.999. 50 161 000.50 89, 738. 00 250, 738. 50 19. 4 0. 0 13. 4 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3904 /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 0.00 0. 00 1.264. 64- 1.264. 64 0.0 3755 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN '16; 388. 00 • "" - 17365 67- - 12; 291. 03 "' 4; 096: 97 "----75. O OBJECT SUBTOTAL 16, 388. 00 1, 365. 67 11.026. 39 5, 361. 61 67. 2 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 387, 670. 00 1 . 365. 67- 51, 912. 41 .. .. .. • 335. 757. 59 13. 3 FUND TOTAL 387, 670. 00 1 . 365. 67 5 1 . 912. 41 335, 757. 59 13. 3 FINANCE-FA484 TIME 19:16:05 1 _ rr I FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION r-• • r I r, • r •, I 155 CROSSING GUARD FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3101 3103 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /CURRENT YEAR SECURED /PRIOR YEAR COLLECT IONS 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT- 'CRY- FUND T - FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 73, 495. 00 0. 00 43, 917. 99 5, 000. 00' 0. 00 1; 351. 32- 78. 495. 00 0. 00 42, 566. 67 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 1, 561. 00 42520 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 561. 00 425.20 41 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL' •i 1• e r. r • • 1 I • rH' DEPT 0000 303. 00 0. 00 29, 577. 01 6, 35.1: 32 35, 928. 33 59. 7 27. 0 54. 2 2, 429. 57 968. 57- 155. 6 2, 429. 57 868. 57- 155. 6 303. 00 303. 00 - 0: 00 303. 00 0. 00 100. 0 :0.00 - 100. 0 TOTALS 80, 359. 00 425. 20 45, 299. 24 35, 059. 76 56. 3 FUND TOTAL' 80, 359. 00' 42520-- 45, 299: 24 '-35;o59:76-.........56. 3-- 0, 0 C • F • I NANCE-FA484 • i TIME 19: 16: 05 r, n • • • !, r ! r • FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 160 SEWER FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL - - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT- -(BY-FUND/- PAGE 0015- FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 -• 75. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED " EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7. 81, 500. 00 12, 553. 58 81. 500. 00 --12i 553. 58 80, 751. 84 748. 16 99. 0 eo, 751. 84 748.16 -99. 0 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3602 - • /BEACH 'OUTLET MA INTENANC 000. 00 0. 00 2, 051. 00' 2; 949. 00 41: 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 000. 00 0. 00 2, 051. 00 2, 949. 00 • 41. 0 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES------ ' ----• ---------- - • ••---- "" • -- • 3828 /SEWER CONNECTION FEE 18, 000. 00 628. 01 . 10, 611. 77 7, 388. 23 58. 9 3829 /SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 1, 200. 00 61. 00 879. 54 320. 46 73. 2 3832 -- -- /SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN.........1.500. 00 -150. 00 350.00 --------------1. 150. 00 - 23. 3 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 20, 700. 00 B39. 01 11, 841. 31 8.058. 69 57. 2 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 155, 753. 00 96, 230. 92 867, 060. 28 288. 692. 72 75. 0 1, 155, 753. 00 96, 230. 92 867, 060. 28 289, 692. 72 75. 0 .... _ __ .... .. ___ . . . ._ _... . DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1, 262, 953. 00 109. 623. 51 961, 704. 43 301, 248. 57 76. 1 FUND TOTAL 1, 262, 953. 00 109, 623. 51 961, 704. 43 301.248.57 _ . 76. 1 FINANCE-FA484 TIME 19:16:05 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 150 GRANT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT -(BY-FUNDI-------- FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 EST REV MONTHLY REV 3, 340. 00 PAGE 0013 '"- DATE 04/16/90 75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED""-'- "- - YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 0. 00 1, 886. 52 3, 340. 00 ---------0. 00 Y1 1,453.48 56.4 1, 886. 52 -..___ -.-- 1, 453. 48 . - .....- 56. 4...... 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3517 /OFFICE OF -TRAFFIC SAFET ' '-' ""' O. 00 0. 00 0.00 -.." 3528 /PER CAPITA GRANT 58, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 58, 000. 00 0. 0 3529 /WILDLIFE GRANT 20, 204. 00 0. 00 0. 00 20, 204. 00 . 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL . 78, 204. 00 -"---- 0. 00 - -" 0. 00 -.... ' 78, 204. 00 ' '. . 0. 0 3700 INTERGOVERNMENT/FEDERAL 3701 /FEDERAL AID URBAN 3712 /FED EMERG MGMT AGENCY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 200, 000. 00 - 89, 738. 00 289, 738. 00 -0700 0. 00 0. 00 38, 999. 50. 0. 00 38, 999. 50 161;000.50 89, 738. 00 250, 738. 50 19. 4 0. 0 13. 4 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3904 /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 0. 00 0. 00 1, 264. 64- 1, 264. 64 0. 0 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN - 16, 388.00 " 17365:67 12, 291. 03 ..'-'""'-""---4; 096: 97 --"--75.0 -..-.- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 16, 388. 00 1, 365. 67 11, 026.39 5, 361. 61 67. 2 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 387, 670. 00 1 , 365: 6T--"-- 51 , 912. 41 335, 757. 59 13. 3 FUND TOTAL 387, 670. 00 1, 365. 67 51, 912. 41 335, 757. 59 13. 3 II 4 FINANCE-FA484 TIME 19:16:05 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL -- CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT-- FROM EPORT FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 EST REV PAGE --.. 0017-- . DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE -'-"UNREALIZED-..---"'"-- MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 9, 533. 00 2, 290. 26 16, 414. 67 -9,533.00 '---2, 290:26 16,414 67- 6,881.67- 172.1 6, 881: 67 - 172. 1- 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 0.00 " - --- ' " 0.00 /, 923. 62 -7,923.62- --- --O. 0 3912 /FIRE FLOW FEE 100, 000. 00 5,914.00 69, 561. 31 30, 438. 69 69. 5 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 100, 000.00 5, 914.00 77, 484.93 22, 515.07 77.4 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 109, 533.00 8,204.26 93, 899.60 15, 633.40 85.7 FUND TOTAL 109, 533. 00 8, 204. 26 93, 999. 60 15, 633. 40 85. 7 1 • 1 I ' 4. FINANCE-FA484 TIME 19:16:05 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 705 INSURANCE FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL • ' _ _ . CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ' REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT TAT -FUND / FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 - ---/REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR' '- 3955 OF'ERAT INC TRANSFERS IN 3957 /TRANSFER IN -DEPT INS • SVS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL REPORT TOTALS TOTALS EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 44, 948. 00 0. 00 44, 948. 00 0: 00 0. 00 00 1, 764. 00 0. 00 766, 336. 00 74, 930. 89 76e, 100. 00 -'74;930:G9 813, 048. 00 74. 930. 89 19, 992. 33 19; 992. 33 PAGE' 0018 -- DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 7. 24, 955. 67 44. 4 24, 955. 67 50, 191. 67 '50119I. 67 0. 0 1, 764. 00 0. 00 100. 0 541, 546. 45 224, 789. 55 70. 6 593; 502: 12 -174; 597. 68 -- ' 77. 2 613.494.45 199,553.55 75.4 813, 046. 00- -74, 930:-89-- 20, 709, 637. 00 1, 283, 898. 30 613,474:45 199. 553:55 -75.4 14, 887, 53B. 79 5, 822, 098. 21 71.8 -• •.--....---•.-----.--- • -•... 4'.-1--FINANCE-FA484 • r-, TIME 19:16:05 r 6 1.31 = FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION --770017GENERAL FUND ......_. DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3101 3102 3103 _ 3106 IN= 27 -.-- • 3203 J : 3204 3205 ------7-77-77 .. '106 1(r 3- 3207 3108 3110 3111 3112 3113 • 3114 3115 OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • ...... ... • .„,..:::: ....„.• ,, .: . 'REVENUE SUMMARY -REPORT : ••• • .„.1-14NII),,,,,,•••.•,....., .„...,. •-•---:•:.•.,..;:•4.;••:-..:,-,',..:.•••• FROM 03/01/90 ' ,TO •.", 03/31/90 • • • • • • •••,• . ••• „ ••••••• ...,.... •.. .... .... ,.. ...........,. .. ,.;. •••• . .... • •: • • , • ,••:„:„„,, ,,,•,:,,,.,„::„..„::..:„.„.,......,,,,....„..,,,,„„•,•„„,,,,,,,,. :•••••••••,....,....„ ':',.... .:.,!".?,":!:•-'Th'''', -• , .. . ...,......... .,,,...•....,..„, ••••••• - ..... ..: . . „., . ..,„ .....„...„...,....,... ........_,..,..„,.. „, „ .. .. .. .. .,., .. ,...... ...:. .: ..,...:,...,.......„ ..... ..... • • • EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE . • • PAGE -0001:—... DATE 04/16/90 •:75,0% OF YEAR COMPLETE EALTZEU BALANCE % /CURRENT YEAR SECURED 2, 759, 738. 00 /CURRENT- YEAR UNSECURED 183, 850. Oa /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 50, 000. 00 /SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL SB813 60, 000. 00 "TRANSFER TAX 129, 08T-00 /SALES TAX 1, 790, 309. 00 /CABLE TV FRANCHISE 101, 678. 00 ELECTRIC FRANCHISE- 36, 641. 00 /GAS FRANCHISE 33, 973. 00 /REFUSE FRANCHISE • 140, 000. 00 /TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY154, 278700 /BUSINESS LICENSE 410, 000. 00 5, 849, 554. 00 3200 LICENSES AND PERMITS 3202 • /DOG LICENSES /BICYCLE -LICENSES /BUILDING PERMITS /ELECTRIC PERMITS /PLUMBING -PERMITS • • . . „ c 3209 3211 3212 - 3213 3214 •• • • • 17, 000. 00 300.-00 • /OCCUPANCY PERMITS:- :•••• /GARAGE SALES /BINGO -PERMITS - /BANNER PERMITS /ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS TAN IMAL-REDEMP T ION -FEB •,••••••1:::, 0. 001, 492, 225. 80 1, 267, 512. 20 ,, 187011752 2. 013785- 10541: 0---0 ?3.: 339775"7 '•,‘, l'.14885758673.73955 .'' '• /1, 412. 65 0. 00 .''''.•''‘‘ 53' 3". 99 .. . 3, 328. 99- 106. 6 827916776- 467170724 80 9 . 64. 2 1, 331, 605. 58 458, 703. 42 86, 721. 99 14, 956. 01 74.3 0. 00 85.2 000 ...',•-•'••,,.; 0. 00 ' ' 33, 973. 00 0. 0 0. 00 .,'.: .`.:- 87, 869. 64 ' 52, 130. 36 0-7022, 893. 73 31, 384727--7692: 6-7 .: 31, 209. 62 277, 071. 80 132, 928. 20 177, 935. 14 3, 769, 085. 49 2, 080, 468. 51 67. 5 64. 4 94, 083. 30 0. 00 170, 000. 00 38, 000. 00 307000700 6, 000. 00 .-;•••••:' 779 50 16o 806. 25 *3700 231H85 11, 743. 24 117, 362. 39 2, 023. 50 31, 963. 00 2, 0337-00,... _ ••••.. • 2778121-00 •:,. '••• 293. 001`-'Y.2:';''-- 4, 101. 00 . ' 6500 ;•••• - 6007-, •••;--; ;'..'..: - - 6600 100. 00 0700 0. 00 1, 360. 00 100. 00 764. 72 650. 00 0. 00 700. 00 3, 500.-00 455. 00 , . , 3, 952:06 390. 00 ' •-••• %• 0 00 : ,'-' :::•••••• 330. 00 267, 365. 00 ' 17, 436 24 -:••••••• ' ' 204, 089. 21 /AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT _ . OBJECT SUBTOTAL . 3.• • 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 4n 3301 /VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS 3303 -----/COURT7FINES/POCICE7-DEP 43 • OBJECT SUBTOTAL • •••• :- • • ••• S 3400 USE OF MONEY -&-PROPER TY 3401 'INTEREST INCOME /RENTS & CONCESSIONS - - /PIER REVENUE 3404 /COMM CTR LEASES 3405 /COMM CTR RENTALS 3406 /COMM C TR -THEATRE 3411 /OTHER FACILITIES 3402 193. 75 98. 8 69715----7772 52. 637. 61 69. 0 6. 037. 00 84. 1 2, 1881 00 9277- 1, 899. 00 68. 3 1. 00 - 101. 5 TOO. to --------__ I 595. 28 56. 2 50. 00- 107. 6 452700- 1-1279- 84. 6 76. 3 60.00. 63, 275. 79 110, 000. 00 12, 478. 99 85, 210. 07 40, 000700 • 377581721 ••••;••:.,,•,..••••.,150, 000 00 17 750 77 28 122 791 ••••••!.",•:. 24, 789. 93 27741.13779 27, 208. 72 77. 4 93. 9 .81.8 189, 105. 00 14, 635. 93 1, 450. 00 187. 39 151, 430. 86 1, 449. 23 10, 500:00 ,400-00 80, 000. 00 8.364: 84383: 2550 47, 000 00 4 2 39, 734. 75 • 34, 00070 2237r.)2. 03076T 60, 000. 00 2, 755. 50 54, 607. 50 37, 674. 14 0. 77 27166. 50 17, 151. 75 7, 265. 25 10796973J 5, 392. 50 80. 0 99. 9 79. 3 70. 5 84. 5 6777-- 91. 0 3i ._ . •• • L7 713 71 73 /4 71. c r r r TItIE 19: 16: 05 4 6 FUND 0I3J DESCRIPTION .--7-001-GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 '3 • :3 1:1H.7.11: r-- -11 22 37 r 17 r. :t • • ord 3826 3827 ---3831 (1•1 3834 3836 3837 - 3838 T3 - r o,305.00 - -•CLTY.,.OF HERMOSA BEACH • ----REVENUE7SUMMARY-REPORT—TET7FUN7 FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90..: 41,087. 30 • • EST REV • ' DATE 04/16/90 75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREAC1 ZED a MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7 0 V it7 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3412 • /TENNIS COURTS 10, 000. 00 1, 012. 00 - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7-432, 055700 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3504 3505 /IN -LIEU OFF HIGHWAY- 393.-00 0. 00 —333. 23 547'7/ 3507 /IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE 708, 891. 00 48, 507. 08 522, 969. 34 185, 921. 66 /HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE 3, 500. 00 1, 164. 14 3508 /MANDATED COSTS 3509 7 /HOMEOWNER PROP TX RELIE /POST. 8, 426. 60 861..36 1,573.40 84.2 2, 193764 3510 2, 391. 60 1, 108. 40 0. 00 67755. 00 67755. 00- 65, 000. 00 ' 0. 00 : 32, 894. 78 32, 105. 22 4s, 000 • 819. 50 ' ' `: 29, 749. 95 18, 250. 05 0. 00 3, 000.'00 5; 500: 00 2, 963. 09 32, 290. 9e 15, 032. 02 53, 453. 81 630, 384. 88 251, 222. 12 7STC-SVC- OFF -TRAINING -8; 500.-00 3514 /CIGARETTE TAX 47, 323. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 881, 607. 00 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES „ 3801- ' " .,.:•-• ,, ,: ..:, •,,,,,,, ...,),.„::y: 3802 /SfGN REVIEW /RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION - - 11, 000. 00 , ' ' 1 120 00 7, 440. 00 3, 560. 00 67. 6 3803 /ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 90000 100. OU 800700 100. 00 88. 8 4 3806 /BQARD OF APPEALS , 230. 00 460. 00 3, 540. 00 690. 00 83. 6 3800 300. 00 0. 00 225. 00 75. 00 75. 0 \ 7Z0NE VARIANCE -REVIEW , 1, 280: 00 ,_ 870. 00- 3809 /TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW 7:9225. 00 ‘,;.;.:. ..:•:;‘k-' 4, 725. 00 167. 9 3810 /FINAL MAP REVIEW 675. 00 87. 5 3811 /ZONECHANGE' REVIEW 3, 050. 00 ' ,':'• : 0. 00'.':''.!,;';Q:;•I'•,•:" 2, 175. 00 z 1, soo: oo 875. 00 : 71. 3 '1 3812 /CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW U. DO 17090.'00 710. 00 60: 5 3813 /PLAN CHECK FEES . 23, 856. 00 •1, 188. 21 21, 518. 21 2, 337. 79 90. 2 3814 115, 000. 00 8, 929. 02 78, 170. 67 36, 829. 33 > 67. 9 /PLANN/NG/ZONING APPEAL 2; 398'00 583.00 ,els:oo..24377-- 3815 /PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES . 10, 000. 00 .al 1- . ' 3817 /SPECIAL CURB MARKING 300.00 6, 247. 58 3,752. 42 62. 4 18, 000. 00 ' '. : 0: 00 •.:.:. :-.- • 3818 /POLICE 'SERVICES 170. 00 •• 130. 00 56. 6 a, 1, 574. 50" ' •-••. 2, 866. 75 5, 133. 25------ 71.'4 --------> 3819 /JAIL SERVICES , 10, 200. 00 FEE 187. 00 1, 445. 00 . e, 091. 50 2, 10E3. 50 - -.79. 3 ------- 3820 /TRUSTY ADMIN - 0.00 -186..50 • - - . • • 0. 50 99.7 3821 - /FINGERPR INT -SERVICE 3,000: 00 --. - 3823 /SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY -231: 50- -17846. 50 I; 153: 50 '61. 5 •,.• 45, 000. 00 3, 355. 00 • 41, 087, 30 • \ 3, 912. 70 91. 3 3824 /VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES 3, 000. 00 —: 2, 917. 50 5, 550. 00 2, 550. 00- 185. 0 "PUBLIC NOTICE' POSTING . '100: 00 0. OU 20. 00 .. /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES 30 650. 00 4, 083. 00 16, 337. 00 14, 313. 00 , 53. 3 /LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT 4, 517. 00 4, 517. 00 4, 517. 00 0. 00 . 100.0 - - - - /STREET CUT INSPECTION -----7-----15, 000. 00 ----25700 .• /ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 17, 616. 00 • .' 0. 00 10, 700. 00 3 ,.• • /FUMIGATION INSPECT FEE 9, 167. 50 8, 4413. 50 52. 0 7, 500. 00 . 310. 20 4, 641. 80 2, 858. 20 61.8 ..:, ---- — - /RETURNED CHECK CHARGE ------77 800. 00 60700 611. 80 /SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIO 3. 60 598. 55 401. 45 59.8 70 1, 000. 00 , 71 1:1477- 73. 7 68. 3 0'. 0 50. 6 61. 9 35. 2 68. 2 71.5 .11 r r� r 1 - FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15:03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND DIVISION 1132 CITY PROSECUTOR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY- FUND)-- FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION TOTAL 156, 450. 00 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES" 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT'SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1141 CITY TREASURER 25, 440. 00 25, 440. 00 25, 600. 00 25, 600. 00 - ' 920. 00 920. 00 51, 960. 00 DEPT: - LEGISLATIVE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT --INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 12, 807. 00 500. 00 256. 00 256. 00 9, 000. 00 22, 819. 00 2. 000. 00 2, 000. 00 700. 00 1, 400. 00 185. 00 250. 00 500. 00 1, 844. 00 4, 879. 00 800. 00 800. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND 13, 708. 11 87, 719. 01 AGE.._ _.....000 3 ... DATE 04/16/90 75. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 0. 00 2, 120. 00 19, 080. 00 2, 120. 00 19, 080. 00 4, 070. 00 4, 070. 00 95. 00 95. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 150. 00 -7; 150. 00 -631. 65 631.65 6, 285. 00 26, 861. 65 1, 070. 00 148. 20 0. 00 0. 00 750. 00 1, 968. 20 0. 00 0. 00 _... 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 9, 490. 00 _._._._..__.. .. 0. 00 650. 19 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 247. 00 ` - "" " 0. 00 6, 750. 00 0. 00 17, 137. 19 0. 00 83. 50 83: Sd --- 46. 09 _ 538 156. 40 1, 009 75. 00 75 0. 00 0 0. 00 0 174. 00 1, 326 451. 49 "" -' 21949 O. 00 16' 62 00 00 00 54 32 - - 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 . 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 __....---..... 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 68, 730. 99 6, 360. 00 6, 360. 00 18, 450. 00 18; 450. 00 288. 35 288. 35 25, 098. 35 3, 317. 00 150. 19- 256. 00 9: 00 - -- 2, 2, 250. 00 5, 681. 81 1, 916. 50 1; 916. 50 161. 84 390. 38 110. 00 250. 00 500. 00 517. 46 1; 929. 68 27. 9 27. 9 68. 6 . ......_.. 68. 6 51. 6 74. 1 130. 0 0. 0 96. 4 75. 0 75. 1 4. 1 4. i 76 72 40 0 0 71 60 8 1 5 0 0 9 4 800.00--• 0.0 800.00 0.0 c • r1 i FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV ODJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1201 CITY MANAGER I' S A CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -EXPENDITURESUMMARY' REPORT '"-(BY "FUND) FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION 30, 498. 00 409, 175. 00 DEPT:- MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC"'-" 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES' 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP .. ". 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER'CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1202 FINANCE ADMIN DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL -1017-616: 101;'616: 00 1, 848. 00 1, 848. 00 ' "'3, 900. 00 ' 109, 212. 00 300. 00 300. 00 800. 00 1, 500. 00 350. 00 125. 00 L'150. 00 3, 181. 00 2, 900. 00 5, 481. 00 15, 487. 00 124, 999. 00 MGMT/SUPPORT 191, 120. 00 2, 523. 00 3, 855. 00 3. 055. 00 5, 000. 00 206, 353. 00 51, 910. 00 51, 910. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 2, 419. 69 30, 665. 38 20, 170. 01 ENCUMBRANCE 231, 680. 88 PAGE..... .. 0004' DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 10, 327. 99 66. 1 74.73 177, 419.39 56.6 8, 086:'02--------731-177. 59 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 91. 50 1, 238. 18 248. 50 -- I, 095. 50-- 8, 0 --_8, 426. 02 75, 51 1. 27 11. 50 184. 50 11. 50 184. 50 53. 07 50. 85 9. 26 0. 00 50. 00 0. 00 82. 00- 545. 00 626. 18 0. 00 0. 00 - . 0. 00 0. 00 436. 55 • 1; 293: 64- 124. 67 90. 07 .656..38-- 93. 656..38.93. 95 1, 387. 96 3; 042: 86- 7, 926. 08 9, 063. 70 83, 621. 85 15, 600. 00 83. 36 0. 00 834. 25 0. 00 16, 517. 61 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 137, 582. 00 2, 818. 78 101. 83 3, 173. 16 --- ..._.._. 5, 220. 12 148, 895. 89 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ---287-438:-4I-----72:0 "- 1, 848. 00 0. 0 609. 82 67. 0 2,-804. 50- _ ..._ -28. 0 .. 33, 700. 73 69. 1 115. 50 61. 5 115. 50 61. 5 363. 45 - - 206. 36 225. 33 34. 93 --493. 62 3, 087. 05 1, 512. 04 1, 638. 14 7, 560. 92 41, 377.15 54. 5 86. 2 35. 6 72. 0 57. 0 2. 9 47. 8 70. 1 51. 1 66. 8 53, 538. 00 71. 9 295. 78- 1 1 1. 7 3, 753. 17 2. 6 681. 84 82. 3 220. 12- 104. 4 57, 457. 11 72. 1 0. 00 36, 979. 07 900. 00 14, 030. 13 0. 00 .. ` 36 979: 07- 900. 00 "' - 14, 030. 13 72. 9 72. 9 1 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1202 FINANCE ADMIN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - - EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT - (BY- -- - FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPR IAT ION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 2, 563. SUPPLIES 10, 772. 225. 2, 460. 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 1, 700. 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 7.808. OBJECT SUBTOTAL 25, 608. 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EGUIPMENT-LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 400. 00 400. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 284, 271. 00 1203 PERSONNEL DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES -- 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4320 MEDICAL EXAMS 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 MGMT/SUPPORT 53, 729. 00 1, 043. 00 1, 043. 00 3, 900. 00 59, 715. 00 15, 480. 00 11, 320. 00 26, 800. 00 900. 00 5, 000. 00 • 710. 00 3, 625. 00 070. 00 • 22, 500. 00 2, 289. 00 - 36, 094. 00 • - 400. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. PAGE . 0005 DATE 04/16/90 75. 07., OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 182. 93 1, 613. 79 775. 85* 9,4323. 30' 0. 00 191. 95 0. 00 771. 00 220. 00 1, 721. 19 397:01 5, 570. 64 1,921.73 17,545.93 . .• 0. 00 949. 21 62. 9 0. 00 -2, 748: 70- 74:4 • • 0.00 5.00 97.7 0. 00 738. 81 69. 9 0. 00 302. 99 ----- 23:3 0. 00 2, 317. 36 70. 6 0. 00 8, 062. 07 68. 5 0. 00 110. 76 0. 00 110.76- 19, 439.34 203,-532:4 419. 48 130. 24-, 132. 5 419. 48 • 130. 24- * 132. 5 • • • 1-; 319. 48 79, 419. 07 72. 0 3, 131. 93 39, 310. 02 0. 00 14, 418. 98 73.1 •1, 650. 86 1. 650. 86. 0. 00 - - - --- - 607. 66--' - 158.2 994. 40 1, 535. 60 0. 00 492. 60- 147. 2 248. 50 1, 095. 50 0. 00 2, 804. 50 28. 0 6, 025. 69 4359198 0. 00 16, 123:02 73. 0 • 445. 84 .10, 535. 96. 109. 50 0. 00 4, 174. 92 0. 00 445. 84 14, 710. 8B 109. 50 92. 40 790. 25 0. 00 165. 64 • * - • •2, 862. 85 " • 0. 00 0. 00 597. 50 0. 00 1, 480. 00 2, 372. 00 118. 95 0. 00 - 527. 08 0. 00 7, 508. 22 12, 060. 14 800. 00 227. 00 1, 610. 11 0. 00 9; 473. 26* .20,1319. 93 0. 00 -10:00 • • -4;834..54 68. 7 • -- 7, 145. 08 . 36. 8 11, 979. 62 55. 2 109. 75 2, 137. 15 112.50 1, 134. 05 •• 542. 92 9, 639. 86 678. 89 918. 95 - 14;355. 12 87. 8 57. 2 84. 1 68. 7 49. 2 57. 1 70. 3 • • 60.2 0. 00 • -390: 00 2. 5 BOO. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 800. 00 0. 7 • ri- I. .i r', i r'. FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT '- (BY'-FUND'Y FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION _ PAGE.. "-' . 0006 DATE 04/16/90 75. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 1, 200. 00 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 123, 809. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 1205 CABLE TV r •I,:� 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN' ' '- 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES -- 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1206 DATA PROCESSING 15, 944. 79 10. 00 0. 00 79, 132. 79 1, 020. 45 • 25, 261. 00 1, 290. 60 489, 00 0. 00 _.. _.. 489. 00 - ' 0. 00 2, 000. 00 157. 50 28, 239. 00 1, 448. 10 1, 000. 00 1 000. 00 -- 700. 00 1, 000. 00 600. 00 350. 00 500. 00 533. 00 3, 683. 00 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 37, 922. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 83, 320. 00 300. 00 1, 650. 00 1, 650. 00 86, 920. 00 14, 476. 14 563. 93 0. 00 1, 515. 50 16, 555. 57 0. 00 0. 00 -0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 20. 00 0. 00 0. 00 --'20:"00------ 0. 00 1, 190. 00 0. 8 43, 647. 76 64. 7 10, 784. 86 57. 3 74. 93- 115. 3 489. Od - - 0. 0 484. 50 75. 7 1 1, 683. 43 58. 6 980. 00 980: 00 ...60:30 -.._257.-38 300:00 O. 00 0. 00 O. 00 1 , 000. 00 0.00 45. 00 O. 00 555. 00 8. 50 .192. 50 0. 00 -. - '- 157. 50 0.00 437. 00 0. 00 63. 00 50.00 385.40 0.00 147.60 118. 80 -... 1, 317. 28 -300. 00..-...__-..-2;"065. 72._ .. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1,566.90 6, 662. 75 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6. 662. 75 107, 416. 00 7, 578. 85 0. 00 0. 00 53. 32 0. 00 17, 946. 17 300. 00 57, 694. 35 231. 72 563. 93 0. 00 58, 490. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 51, 817. 73 0. 00 -53. 32- 5, 000. 00 4, 946. 68 2. 0 0. 0 7. 5 55. 0 87. 4 72. 3 43. 9 0. 0 0. 0 1. 0 19, 675. B3 48. 1 25, 625. 65 68. 28 1, 086. 07 I, 650. 00 28, 430. 00 69. 2 77. 2 34. 1 0. 0 67. 2 55, 590. 27 48. 2 4; ID FINANCE-FA454 «1TIME 17:15:03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR fl r r r • • r; r. r' • - 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT- (BY FUND) PAGE FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE . . APPROPR IAT ION 1206 DATA PROCESSING DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 107, 416. 00 7, 578. 85 51, 817. 73 0. 00 55, 592. 27 48. 2 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 3, 000. 00 239. 60 1, 839. 72 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ' 11, 348. 00 161.08 -4, 415: 95 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 3, 000. 00 53. 16 566. 63 4315 MEMBERSHIP 670. 00 105. 00 225. 00 4316 TRAINING 3; 300. 00 O. 00 2, 518. 77 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 850. 00 0.00 424.05 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 2, 220. 00 223. 00 1, 550. 64 OBJECT SUBTOTAL • • • -- 24, 388. 00 - . - 781. 84 ------- 11; 540:76 0. 00 1, 160. 28 61. 3 0. 00 6; 932. 05 - 33.-9- 194. 08 2, 239. 29 25. 3 0. 00 445. 00 33. 5 0. 00. 781:23 --•''--. 76. 3 0. 00 425. 95 49. 8 0. 00 669. 36 69. 8 194. 08 -12, 653. 16 48. 1 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 000 . O. 00 442.29 0.O0- 442. 29- O. 0 - - - 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 19, 518. 00 O. 00 1, 965. 82 O. 00 17, 552. 18 10. 0 • . OBJECT SUBTOTAL 19, 518. 00 O. 00 2, 408. 11 0. 00 17, 109. 89 12. 3 • DIVISION TOTAL 238, 242. 00 1207 BUS LICENSE DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT -- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 62, 000. 00 500. 00 1, 664. 00 1, 664. 00 65, 828. 00 15, 023. 44 124, 256. 60 5, 965. 89 95. 04 0. 00 0. 00 6, 060. 93 42, 294. 07 95. 04 0. 00 0. 00 42, 389. 11 194. 08 113, 791. 32 52. 2 0. 00 19, 705. 93 68. 2 0. 00 404. 96 19. 0 0. 00 - - 1, 664.-00- • O. 0 0. 00 1, 664. 00 0. 0 0. 00 23, 438. 89 64. 3 .. _ . . .... ... 52. 00 0. 00 26. 78 • 0. 00 25.22 51.5 160.00 37.95 0:00 - 84.10 47.4 212. 00 37. 95 102. 68 0. 00 109. 32 48. 4 500. 00 4, 000. 00 350. 00 400. 00 50. 00 600. 00 600. 00 43. 92 256. 90 0. 00 209. 03 2, 879. 06 0. 00 9. 70 173: 03 - 0. 00 0. 00 16. 00 0. 00 0. 00 40. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -341:o3 0. 00 88. 52 581. 09 0. 00 243. 10 1, 120. 94 176. 97 384. 00 10. 00 258.97 18. 91 51. 3 .• 71.9 49. 4 4. 0 80. 0 56. 8 96. e FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV ODJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1207 BUS LICENSE r' i . , • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE' SUMMARY REPORT -'(BY" FUNDI FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL - DIVISION' --"'TOTAL 4, 704. 00 -"1 1 , 204. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 463. 00 3, 311. 73 ' 814. 17 •----'--" 7; 598.84 ----- -77; 77; 244. 00 ' """' 6; 913. 05' ' '--"--50;- 090. 63-- 1206 GEN APPROP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF -- 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL - - 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 21, 926. 00 " 469. 00 ' 469. 00 22, 864. 00 21, 528. 00 21, 528. 00 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1212 EMP BENEFITS 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 250. 00 300. 00 250. 00 1, 791. 00 2, 591. 00 319. 00 319. 00 18, 156. 00 18, 156. 00 65, 458. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 544, 529. 00 544, 529. 00 2, 038. 00 17, 270. 73 0. 00 0. 00 2, 038. 00 17, 270. 73 PAGE -0008 _...._. DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 1, 022. 29 10, 475. 35 1, 022. 29 -""'---`-'10; 475. 35 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 392. 27 -'3, 605. 16 ' 4, 655. 27 469. 00 5, 593. 27 70. 4 67. 8 8-- 78. 7 0. 0 75.5 11, 052. 65 48. 6 -11;052.'65 48.6"... 20. 25 ..._ ... _..._...... 202.' 25- - - O. 00 .. ... _....._ .47. 75 3, 655. 07- 36, 852. 68- 14. 51 37, 138. 17 0. 00 98. 00 0. 00 152. 00 ' 178. 00 ' 1';'258: 03 - O. 00 ---- --"' 532: 97 3, 456. 82- 35, 294. 40-- 14. 51 37, 870. 89 0. 00 0. 00 1, 506. 48 1, 506. 48 1, 109. 95 318. 44 318. 44 13, 540. 17 -13; 540.-17 6; 310:29 56, 579. 93 429, 322. 92 ' ' 56, 579. 93 "'" "' 429, 322. 92- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0: 00 14. 51 0. 00 0. 00 - B0. 9 12279. 3 39. 2 70.2 1361. 6 0 0. 56 0. 56 4,615.83 "4, 615. 83 59, 133. 20 115, 206. 08 115, 206. 08 99. 8 99. 8 74. 5 74. 5 9. 6 78. 8 78. 8 r r• FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15:03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND DIVISION TOTAL 1213 RETIREMENT • • 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES - 4180 RETIREMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1214 PROSP EXP CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH --EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT " (BY ""FUND7- FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION 544, 529. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 56, 579. 93 822, 159. 00 68, 994. 71 822, 159. 00 68, 994. 71 822, 159. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4322 UNCLASSIFIED 28,190.00 4397 2. 5': ANTICIPATED SAVINGS 241, 620. 00 - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 213, 430. 00 - DIVISION " TOTAL 213, 430. 00- 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4398 RESDL EQUITY TRSFR OUT 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2101 POLICE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 4109 COURT TIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 1, 056, 506. 00 6, 914. 00 1, 063, 420. 00 1, 063, 420. 00 3, 168, 623. 00 DEPT: POLICE 500, 237. 00 1., 551, 397: 00 19, 920. 00 7, 500. 00 90, 000. 00 20, 500. 00 41, 547. 00 41, 547. 00 43, 482. 00 429, 322. 92 PAGE- 0009 -- DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 68, 994. 71 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 564, 592. 92 564, 592. 92 564, 592. 92 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 o: 00 0. 00 1, 056, 505. 60 O. 00 ........_ _. ....6. 914. 00 -....._. 0. 00 1 . 063. 419. 60 0. 00 1, 063, 419. 60 193, 635. 81 -21622; 226.-22 115, 206. 08 0. 00 257, 566. 08 0. 00 257, 566. 08 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 257, 566. 08 28, 190. 00 241, 620. 00- -213;430. 00-.... 78. 8 68. 6 68. 6 1' 2 7 • L. 0. 00 21'3 430. Od -- i0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 40 99. 9 0. 00 100. 0 0. 40 99. 9 0. 00 0. 40 99. 9 -2;856.-52 ----- 543; 540. 26 82. 8 41, 042. 55 347, 669. 23 135, 980. 82 1, 102, 305158-- 1, 05.58---1, 820. 00 13, 859. 47 1, 905. 26 22, 802. 05 7, 439. 65 ..__."..._.- 77; 548. 56 -- - _ -- 2. 490. 68 15, 739. 04 0. 00 1, 002. 05 0. 00 —`- 42; 895: 32 185. 40 14, 599. 86 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 152, 567. 77 449,-091. 42 - . . 6, 060. 53 1.5. 302. 05- _12. 451. 44 69. 5 71. 0 69. 5 304. 0 86. 1 0. 00 4, 760. 96 76. 7 0. 00 40.544. 95 2. 4 0. 00 - — 1; 348. 32- 103. 2 0. 00 28, 882. 14 33. 5 O r r • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 2101 POLICE r' DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4114 POLICE RESERVES 4116 TRAINING TIME --- -- 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4118 FIELD TRAINING OFFICER 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES'' 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE -. 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURESUMMARY' REPORT -"(BY -FUND) FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPR IATION POLICE 13, 500. 00 0. 00 9, 318. 00 10, 000. 00 2, 387, 593. 00 95, 452. 00 37, 757. 00 133, 209. 00 -22,500: 00 34, 231. 00 6, 525. 00 _ 3, 000. 00 8, 500. 00 17, 500. 00 21, 000. 00 17, 500. 00 8, 500. 00 1, 535. 00 12, 736. 00 4, 000. 00 - 337, 510. 00 495, 037. 00 1, 537. 00 25, 000. 00 16, 125. 00 42, 662. 00 143, 640. 00 143, 640. 00 3, 202, 141. 00 3, 202, 141. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 1,733.00 469. 76- 713. 40 290. 93 2, 251. 52 --'- 195, 383. 45 17, 382. 62 --- 469: 76"---- 5, 681. 59 4, 305. 67 ------29; 084. 1I -' 1, 695, 344. 91 7, 187. 91 56, 025. 21 153. 75 13, 876. 70 7, 341. 66"' —' 69; 901': 91 2; 429.'43- 3, 556. 29 749. 93 150. 50 548. 99 2, 004. 81 .4, 182. 17 964. 34 2, 340. 25 100. 00 149. 69 95. 00- 33, 265. 00 50, 346. 40 0. 00 4, 622. 29 12, 000. 00 16, 622. 29 2, 306. 07 2, 306. 07 271, 999. 87 271, 999. 87 PAGE ._. - -- 0010 0010.' ..'._ ..._ DATE 04/16/90 75.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE :! 0. 00 -"' 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3;688. 33 3, 688. 33 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 '-- 21", 04r. 63- 0. 00 28, 300. 36 1, 277. 96 7, 523. 02 636. 95 2; 542: B2 ' 0. 00 4, 695. 04 714. 15 17, 631. 38 0. 00 16, 025: 27-------4;-726. 65 15, 493. 69 0. 00 6, 075. 21 0. 00 -- 1, 320. 00___.—___.... _... O. 00 1 1, 123. 1 1 0. 00 4, 023. 18 0. 00 -237; 713. 30 '—'__._.._._-._....__. 0. 00 373, 513. 01 7, 355. 71 326. 74 9, 342. 32 -18, 000. 00 '---' - 27, 669. 06 157, 300. 86 157, 300. 86 269. 95 0. 00 0. 00 • 269. 95 0. 00 0. 00 2, 323, 729. 75 • 1 1, 313. 99 2, 323, 729. 75 11,313. 99 3, 882. 62- 128. 7 ....... 469. 76- _._ .... .. 0. 0 3, 636. 41 60. 9 5, 694. 33 43. 0 5, e72. 56- -- 84.-8 688, 559. 76 71. 1 39, 426. 79 58. 6 23, 880. 30 36. 7 63; 307. 09 -----'"-_ 52. 4" ------17458.: 37 -....._ _. 93..5-.- .._. 4, 652. 68 86. 4 1, 634. 97- 125. 0 --' 457.._18 ._._"_'. '84.7 --- 3, 090. 81 63. 6 131. 38- 100. 7 248.08 -- 98.8. ._.. 2, 001.31 88. 5 2, 424. 79 71. 4 - 215.00 ...... 85.9 1, 612. 89 87. 3 23. 18- 100. 5 ' ; 796..70'---' 70.4 114, 168. 28. 76. 9 940. 31 15, 657. 68 1, 875. 00- 14, 722. 99 13, 660. 86- 13, 660. 86- 867, 097. 26 867, 097. 26 38. 8 37. 3 111. 6 65. 4 109. 5 109. 5 72. 9 72. 9 2 _FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15:03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 2201 FIRE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT .(BY-FUND-Y--------- FROM (BY-FUND-3---.-._._.---FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: FIRE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4108 FLSA OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAYOFF -- 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER-- 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL. 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS - 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2401 ANIMAL CONTROL 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 38, 674. 00 846, 306. 00 96, 000. 00 55, 000. 00 15, 871. 00 15, 871. 00 12, 840. 00 1, 080, 562. 00 20, 349. 00 20, 349. 00 3, 500. 3, 500. 7, 200. 3, 000. 3, 500. 650. 3, 800. 1, 900. 98, 989. 126, 039. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1, 225. 00 10, 157. 00 25, 000. 00 36, 382. 00 113, 881. 00 113, 881. 00 1, 377, 213. 00 I, 377, 213. 00 DEPT: ANIMAL REGULTN -89,291.00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 3. 350. 00 71,929.11.-. 11, 148. 27 5, 266. 29 0. 00.. 2, 064. 96 342. 00 94, 100. 63 1, 259. 15 1, 259. 15 317. 08 756. 94 604. 38 315. 03 261. 14 0. 00 316. 50 615. 44 9, 399. 00 12, 585. 51 0. 00 0. 00 14, 445. 00 14, 445. 00 47. 74 47. 74 122, 438. 03 122, 438. 03 PAGE 0011 DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 27, 199. 25 .634; 899: 59.-.------- 76, 881. 84 42, 522. 44 - 0: 00 11, 954. 62 10, 042. 80 803, 500: 54 15; 897. 7i 15, 897. 71 0. 00 1 1, 474. 7 5 O. 00 211, 406. 41 O. 00 19, 118. 16 0. 00 12, 477. 56 0. 00 -15, 871. 00 0. 00 3, 916. 38 102. 15 2, 695. 05 102. 15 276; 959. 31 70. 3 75. 0 • 80. 0 77. 3 75. 3 79. 0 • 74.3 0. 00 .. ... _...-_.._. 4,_.451. 29 ..... ........ 78. 1 0. 00 4, 451. 29 2, 558. 25 0. 00 3, 316. 82 186. 53 - 5. 163.87--- 372.81... 2, 277. 48 808. 70 585. 00 1, 101. 15 798. 57 70. 792: 74 87, 402. 58 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 00 559. 34 1, 142. 14 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 ..28;890. 00 - 2, 575. 79 30, 032. 14 2, 575. 79 60, 510. 26 60, 510. 26 997, 343. 23 997, 343. 23 0. 00 0. 00 3,237.28 3,237.28 6,813. 32 _.`_. ... 62.-925.-23- 0. 00 941. 75 3. 35- 32 722. 52 2, 691. 30 65. 00 2, 698. 85 1, 101. 43 28, 196: 26 32, 077. 08 82. 86 10, 157. 00 -6, 465. 79- 3, 774. 07 53, 370. 74 53, 370. 74 376, 632. 49 376, 632. 49 78. 1 73. 0 100. 0 76. 8 75. 9 23. 1 90. 0 28. 9 42. 0 71. 5 69. 7 3 v Lt 53. 1 72. 6 72. 6 26, 365177 • 70. 4 • • FINANCE-FA454 ! ' TIME 17:15:03 • 1! • r• i • • A; i FUND DIV ODJT DESCR 001' GENERAL FUND 2401 ANIMAL CONTROL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT tBY FUND) FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: ANIMAL REGULTN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY -OFF -- 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES" 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE . 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES- 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS• OBJECT SUBTOTAL -' 5400 EGUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2701 CIVIL DEFENSE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES' - 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 1, 000. 00 1, 770. 00 1, 770. 00 1, 000. 00 471. 00 95, 302. 00 1,800.00 5, 000. 00 6, BOO. 00 450. 00 - 1, 800. 00 700. 00 1, 400. 00 2, 500. 00 50.00 350. 00 550. 00 10, 164. 00 17; 964. 00 1, 000. 00 13, 000. 00 14, 000. 00 680. 00 " 680. 00 134, 746. 00 134, 746. 00 DEPT: DISASTER PREP PAGE-- 0012 - ...-... DATE 04/16/90 75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 1, 046. 57 0. 00 ----"- -' 563. 93 0. 00 1, 014. 34 89. 25 221. 85 - 18.76 -- -168:84 6, 921. 33 65, 940. 76 11. 50 272. 10 283. 60 53. 46 1. 70 0. 00 143. 02 41. 01 0. 00 0. 00 375. 80 1, 039. 00 1, 653. 99 1, 308. 60 3, 885. 99 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 579:23 1, 184. 97 463. 38 1;'122:81-- 1, 1 1, 270. 50 35. 00 480. 76 7; 045. 80 12; 182. 45 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 46. 57- 104. 6 1,-206. 07 31. 8 755. 66 57. 3 778. 15 22. 1 29, 361.24 69.1 0. 00 491. 40 72. 7 0. 00 1, 114. 01 77. 7 0. 00 ... .."-""--- 1, 605. 41 "- --- 76. 3 216. 32 0. 00 0. 00..... 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 216. 32 129:23=- 398. 29 23=-- 398. 71 236. 62 1, 229. 50 15. 00 --- 350. 00 69. 24 3, 118. 20 128. 7 77. 8 66. 1 80. 2 50. 8 70. 0 0.0 87. 4 69. 3 69. 0 0. 00......-...._.. _ ........ __...0. 00 ... 0. 00 __ .._-1; 000.-00 0: 0 0. 00 13, 394. 89 0. 00 394. 89- 103. 0 0. 00 13, 394. 89 0. 00 605. 11 95. 6 56. 15 505.35 0.00. 56. 15 "- 505.35-- 0.00 8, 915. 07 '-- - 97-;-21.11. 04- 216. 32 ..._- ._.-......-37;311.64 ' - . . 72. 3 B, 915. 07 97, 218. 04 216. 32 37, 31 1. 64 ." 72. 3 174.65 -174.65 74. 3 74. 3 24, 532. 00 2, 154. 50 10, 932. 36 0. 00 111-. r 0 • • r H I 1 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 2701 CIVIL DEFENSE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND Y PAGE 0013 FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 75. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: DISASTER PREP 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 491.00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 491.00 4187 UNIFORMS 231.00 • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 25, 745. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3101 MEDIANS 4. 648. 00 4, 648.00 " " • " 50.00 500. 00 200. 00 3, 600. 00 3. 090. 00 7, 440. 00 4, 500. 00 4, 500. 00 42, 333. 00 42, 333. 00 DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF - 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL . 44, 697. 00 300. 00 894. 00 894. 00 46, 785. 00 47, 630. 00 1. 260. 00 48, 890. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 9, 764. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 14. 58 131. 22 0. 00 2, 169. 08 19, 063. 58 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - O. 00'----0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 000. 00 5.00- 1, 042. 08 290. 00 2, 216. 60 285. 00 5, 258. 69 491. 00 0. 0 491. 00 0. 0 99. 78 56. 8 6, 681. 42 74. 0 4, 648. 00 4. 648. 00 0. 0 0.0 0. 00" 50. 00 0. 0 O. 00 500. 00 0. 0 0. 00 1, eoo. oco- l000. o 0. 00 2. 557:92 28. 9 0.00 873.40 71.7 0. 00 2, 191. 32 70. 6 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 500. 00 0. 0 • 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - "-"- 4, 500. 00 0. 0 2. 454. 08 24.322. 26- 0. 00 18;010:74" 57. 4 2, 454. 0E1 24, 322. 26 0. 00 18, 010. 74 3, 859. 20 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3, 859. 20 34. 173. 97 0. 00 503. 73 34, 677. 70 3. 150. 00 25, 200. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3, 150. 00 25, 200. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 '0. 00 0. 00 737.95 6, 251. 49 0. 00 57. 4 10, 523. 03 76. 4 300. 00 0. 0 894. 00 0. 0 390. 27 56. 3 12, 107. 30 74. 1 22, 430. 00 52. 9 1, 260. 00 0. 0 23, 690. 00 51.5 2, 512. 51 71. 3 ! , ! •r. rl I r,fl • • ; FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR - 001 GENERAL FUND 3101 MEDIANS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT - (BY- FOND) PAGE - 0014 FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 5, 800. 00 0. 00 2 490. 89 392. 79 • 2, 916. 32 49. 7 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES ---------------900.00 • • 0. 00 207: 35-- ------- - ' 0. 00 --' •-• - - 692. 65 . '' ' • 23. 0 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 720.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 720.00 0.0 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 4, 958. 00 475. 00 3, 057. 48 0. 00 1, 900. 52 61. 6 ' OBJECT SUBTOTAL - ---- ------------ 21, 142. 00 - -- ---1-, 212. 95 -12;-007.' 21 392. 79 8, 742. 00 --------58. 6 ------ 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN'$500" OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 116, 817. 00 3103 ST MAINTENANCE • • DEPT:- ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 142; 856: 00 500. 00 2, 848. 00 2, 848. 00 149, 052. 00 0. 00 0. 00 8, 222. 15 71, 884. 91 - 0:00- 0: 0.00 0. 0 392. 79 44, 539. 30 61. 11, 146. 68 -'100.03L'84 0.00" '42824. 16'"""'70."0 0. 00 153. 34 0. 00 346. 66 30. 6 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 848. 00 0. 0 0. 00 '1; 594. 18 0. 00 - 1; 253. 82 """ 55. 9 " • \ 11, 146. 68 101, 779. 36 0. 00 47, 272. 64 68. 2 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES r ! 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 84, 877. 00 5, 898. 98 48, 150. 41 0. 00 36, 726. 59 56. 7 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 84, 877. 00 5, 898. 98 48, 150. 41 0. 00 36, 726. 59 56. 7 I- I - ._.... . , ...... I I • r: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 20, 000. 00 918. 16 8, 571. 22 1, 434. 99 9, 993. 79 50. 0 ! 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES ' 3, 500. 00 •' 317. 11 - ----7- '2, 912:69 ---------0.00- - "-' • - - -587. 31 - 83. 2 I 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 13, 000. 00 1, 358. 68 9, 781. 24 " , 1, 153. 40 2, 065. 36 84.1 4316 TRAINING 600. 00 0. 00 426. 50 .. 0. 00 ' 173. 50 71. 0 .,--- ; 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 55, 281. 00 5, 737. 00 -- 38, 072. 87 0. 00 ' - - ..17, 208. 13 - 68. 8 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 92, 381. 00 8, 330. 95 59, 764. 52 , 2, 588. 39 ' 30, 028. 09 67. 4 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 150. 00 0. 00 149. 05 0. 00 150. 00 0. 00 149. 05 0. 00 20. 844. 00 • ' 20, 844. 00 1, 736. 78 17, 367. 80 1, 736. 78 • 17,367.80 0. 00 0. 95 99. 3 0. 95 •99.3 3,476.20 83.3 0. 00 " -3; 476. 20 ' ' 83. 3 c • • r; '1 1'i r iia • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17:15:03 FUND DIV ODJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND DIVISION TOTAL 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT "(DY'FUND)''--"`- FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION 347, 304. 00 DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES ---- 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY -OFF --- 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER------ 4303 UTILITIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 4101 PLANNING 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 185,731.00 97, 216. 00 500. 00 1, 927. 00 1, 927. 00 101, 570. 00 24, 348. 00 6. 500. 00 30, 848. 00 6, 000. 00 38, 652. 00 1, 000. 00 600. 00 150. 00 250. 00 6, 326. 00 52, 978. 00 1, 127. 00 721. 00 2, 000. 00 0. 00 3, 048. 00 11, 000. 00 1 1 , 000. 00 200, 244. 00 664, 365. 00 DEPT: PLANNING MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 27, 113.39 5, 730. 32 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 5, 730. 32 227, 211.14 -PAGE-- 0015-- DATE PAGE__...,......0015-- DATE 04/16/90 75.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 2, 588. 39 60, 497. 02 225. 50 ' 13. 69 1, 272. 46 62, 008. 67 400. 00 4, 21 1. 12 0. 00 .-_ _ -' 4; 850:"60 400. 00 9, 061. 72 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 348. 00 0. 00 4, 348. 00 563. 26 7, 406. 54 118. 19 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 565. 00 8, 652. 99 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 841. 29 841.29 15, 624. 60 4. 446. 54 25, 029. 69 992. 02 815. 96 186. 25 0. 00..._. 5, 105. 15 36, 575. 61 783. 24 -0: 00 0. 00 11, 084. 96 11; 068. 20 -8; 412: 90 8, 412. 90 127, 927. 10 50, 960. 14 - - 427." 023. 15 0. 00 4, 649. 21 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 649. 21 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 148. 68 7, 148. 68 0. 00 0. 00 16,145. 89 117, 504. 47 66. 1 36, 718.98 62.2 274. 50 45. 1 -1;913.31 _-"' -0.7 654. 54 66. 0 39, 561. 33 61.0 15, 788. 88 1; 649. 40 17, 438. 28 1,553.46 8,973.10 7.90 215.96- 36.25- '250.00' 15.96- 36.25- 250.00 1,220.85 11.753. 18 343. 76 - 721. 00 2, 000. 00 18, 233. 64- 15, 168. 89 2, 587. 10 2, 587. 10 56, 171. 01 19,-127 07 218,-214. 78 11,794.88 119,590.47 0. 00 35. 1 ' 74.6' 43. 4 74. 1 76. 7 99.2 135. 9 124.1 0.0 80. 7 77. 8 69. 4 -0.0 0. 0 0. 0 494. 2 76. 4 76. 4 71. 9 67. 1 66, 140. 53 64. 3 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY" FUND)' FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION 001 GENERAL FUND 4101 PLANNING DEPT: PLANNING 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4376 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 700. 00 3, 749. 00 3, 749. 00 4, 210. 00 • 198, 139. 00 ' 9, 978. 00 " 9, 978. 00 1, 600. 00 15, 531. 00 200. 00 • 500. 00 623. 00 -" 2, 000. 00 1, 450. 00 8, 221. 00 "'•30, 125. 00 1, 084. 00 1, 084. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 239, 326. 00 4102 PLANNING COMM DEPT: 'PLANNING 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE_/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL • 5, 304. 00 5, 304. 00 4, BOO. 00 454. 00 1, 200. 00 6, 454. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 11,758.00 a MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND 120. 33 223. 47 0. 00 -- "'"'"'---"'280:'80 0. 00 1, 999. 44 0. 00 1, 834. 62 PAGE __. -_0016__ ... '- DATE 04/16/90 75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 •1 1, 915. 21 -""- •123, 928. 80'- "'-- _- 0. 00 0. 00 4, 011. 00 0. 00 4, 011.00 142. 26 3, 035. 15 0. 00 0. 00 147. 00 80. 00 0. 00 789. 00 4, 193. 41 ' •-• 0. 00 0. 00 1, 269. 00 12, 045. 47 .._-......81:85 195. 36 605. 00 541. 50 365. 80 5, 857. 14 20, 961. 12 1, 083. 11 16, 108. 62 149, 984. 03 629. 00 .. 629. 00 395. B3 0. 00 0. 00 395. 83 1 , 024. 83 • 4, 594. 25' '_ 4, 594. 25 0. 00 • 0. 00 0. 00 150. 00 '0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 150. 00 0. 00 150. 00 0.00 •- 0. 00 2, 888. 49 0. 00 27. 99 0. 00 __.365. 80 --- ._...-..__ 0. 00 3, 282. 28 0. 00 7, 876. 53 0. 00 476. 53 • 3, 468. 20 .. 1, 749. 56 2, 375. 38 --74, 210. 20 • 5; 967. 00 5, 967. 00 31. 9 7. 4 53. 3 43. 5 62. 5' -"40. 1 40. 1 331. 00 79. 3 3, 335. 53 78. 5 304. 64 39. 0 18. 00 97. 1 -"-11458. 50 1, 084. 20 25. 2 2, 363. 86 71. 2 9, 013:88 • ... ' 70. 0 0: 89 .._.. ' .. 99. 9 0. 89 99. 9 89, 191.97 62.7 • 709.75 ' 709. 75 1, 911. 51 426. 01 834. 20 3, 171. 72 86. 6 86. 6 40. 1 6. 1 30. 4 50. 8 3, 881. 47 66. 9 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17:15:03 FUND DIV ODJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT TOTAL 4201 BUILDING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND)" FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION 251, 084. 00 DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF - 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER -4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 217, 267. 00 200. 00 4, 455. 00 4, 455. 00 226, 377..00 57, 400. 00 700. 00 58, 100. 00 2, 500. 00 6, 500. 00 1, 000. 00 1, 000. 00 1, 200. 00 645. 00 3, 000. 00 0. 00 15, 355. 00 31, 200. 00 1, 200. 00 10, 000. 00 11, 200. 00 326, 877. 00 4202 PUB WKS ADMIN DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4187 UNIFORMS 155, 170. 00 • 0. 00 2, 988. 00 2, 988. 00 5, 000. 00 7, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 17, 133. 45 157, 860. 56 PAGE ... _._...0017...... DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 150. 00 18, 095. 02 156, 729. 35 0. 00 14. 61 0.00 -- 0 00 0. 00 1, 713. 07 18, 095. 02 158, 457. 03 9, 786. 80 847. 30 10, 634. 10 93, 073. 44 62. 9 0. 00 60, 537. 65 72. 1 0. 00 185. 39 7. 3 0. 00 • 4, 455. 00 - ------ 0. 0 0. 00 2, 741. 93 38. 4 0. 00 67, 919. 97 69. 9 38, 536. 53 11, 919. 07 39, 383. 83 11, 919. 07 207. 24 1, 642. 09 0. 00 928. 74 5, 643. 69 350. 67 0. 00 --.-... 711. 00 __ _ 0. 00 41.08 365.26 0. 00 0. 00 210. 30 0. 00 O. 00 __.....__._. 250. 00_------ - - 0. 00 782. 00 2, 346. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 499. 00 "' 10,853.16..__ - 0. 00 3, 458. 06 22, 021. 50 350. 67 207. 10 0. 00 • 207. 10 1, 071. 78 0. 00 1, 071'. 78 32, 394. 28 • 220, 934. 14- 13, 4-- 13, 277. 77 28. 71 0. 00 0. 00 436. 88 116, 033. 95 - 28: 71-- 0. 00 1, 756. 91 . 1;-891. 44---- 4, 363. 04 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -12; 269. 74 • 0. 00 • --0. 00 • 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6, 944. 40 - 147. 147. 30- 6, 797. 10 857. 91 505. 64 634. 74 989.70 395. 00 - 654. 00 0. 00 ------4;•501. 84-- 8, 827. 83 128. 22 10, 000. 00 --AO, 128. 22- - 93; 673. 12 39, 136. 05 28.71- 2, 988. 00 1, 231.09 - 3, 108. 56 2, 636. 96 65. 6 92. 2 71. 1 36. 5 17. 5 38. 7- 78. 2 0. 0 70.6--- 71. - 71. 7 89. 3 0. 0 9. 5 71. 3 74. 7 • 0.0 0. 0 58. 7 • 37. 8 62. 3 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 4202 PUB WKS ADMIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT --(BY FUND) FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT -'' OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER-- 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS .--' OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT "- 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS 5602 IMPRVMTS OTHER THN BLDGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 173, 146. 00 4, 600. 00 5, 000. 00 9, 600. 00 5, 200. 00 9, 500. 00 0. 00 800. 00 B00. 00 650. 00 2, 900. 00 1, 400. 00- 43, 233. 00 61, 683. 00 1, 550. 00 400. 00 1, 950. 00 ' 1, 600. 00 1, 600. 00 247, 979. 00 4204 BLDG MAINT DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4107 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 145, 015. 00 2, 000. 00 2, 092. 00 2, 892. 00 0.' 00 300. 00 153, 099. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 13, 743. 36 -PAGE- - ' - 0018 DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 124, 074. 05 0. 00 1, 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 6, 545. 55 629. 13 0. 00 84. 08 0. 00 225. 00 245. 00 0. 00 3, 985. 00 5, 713. 76 446. 000. 446. 89 00 89 0. 00 49, 071. 95 71. 6 0. 00 3, 153. 11 31. 4 0. 00 .... - o: 00 O. 00 3, 153. 11 67. 1 3, 718. 31 6, B35. 83 112. 85 711. 79 420. 44 -901: 00 678. 50 0. 00 --- ----311275:70 45, 654. 42 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ._. 0. 00 0. 00 1, 481. 69 2, 664. 17 1, 112: 85- 88. 21 379. 56 71. 5 71.9 0. 0 88. 9 52. 5 6 3 -- ' 251'. 00=-"' -138. 2, 221. 50 23. 1, 400. 00- 0. 0 11; 957. 30 - 72. 3 16, 028. 58 74. 0 0. 00 038. 74 0. 00 -711. 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 • 0. 00 -- - - --838. 74 -` -�- 0. 00 --1; 111.26 0. 00'-"' - 0. 00 24, 457. 12 12, 202. 10 68. 52 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 16. 68 12, 287. 30 - 0. 00 ' _- ' 1, 592. 00 0. 00 1, 592. 00 177, 014. 10 106, 929: 36- 864. 49 ' 0. 00 2, 408. 69 2, 317. 50 150. 12 •112, 670. 16 1, 592. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 • 8. 00 8. 00 69, 372. 90 38, 085. 64 1, 135. 51 2, 892. 00 483. 31 2. 317. 50-- 149. 88 -40, 428. 84 54. 1 0. 0 99. 5 99. 5 72. 0 73. 7 43. 2 0. 0 83. 2 0. 0 50. 0 73. 5 A L. • i• FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 4204 BLDG MAINT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND)" FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING 4321 BUILDING SAFETY/SECURITY 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT --- 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 17, 860. 00 17, 860. 00 80; 000: 00 45, 000. 00 1, 000..00 1, 200. 00 500. 00 9, 500. 00 22, 057. 00 159, 257. 00 475. 00 475. 00 330, 691. 00 4205 EQUIP SERVICE DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -- 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES 94, 031. 00 1, 150. 00 - 2, 017. 00 2, 017. 00 6, 300. 00 105, 515. 00 4, 700. 00 1, 500. 00 3, 000. 00 200.00 7, 288. 00 16, 688. 00 2, 555. 00 1, 445. 00 • 5, 800. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 1, 405. 00 1, 405. 00 PAGE 0019 DATE 04/16/90 75.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 11, 620. 00 - 11, 620. 00 8, 901. 94 61; 888742 2, 766. 12 26, 068. 04 47. 97 510. 12 87. 63 ... _.... 155: 27--- 0. T----- 0. 00 O. 00 140. 04 2, 103. 4B 2, 185. 00 _ .15, 499: 53 14, 128. 70 106, 223. 86 0. 00 0. 00 27, 821. 00 7, 725. 66 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 725. 66 249. 07 19. 56 811. 19 O. 00 ..... .. ... 693. 00 1, 772. 82 753. 23 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6, 240. 00 65. 0 0. 00 .._...... 6; 240. 00 ._. .. 65. 0 0. 00 -_.._-18; i 11: 58- 389. 14 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 396. 52 22. 1 0. 00 6, 558. 47 - 70. 2 399. 14 52, 644. 00 66. 9 18, 542. 82 489. 88 1, 044. 73 ..-- 500. 00 58. 7 51. 0 • 12: 9 0. 0 234. 25 234. 25 230, 748. 27 68, 245. 87 1, 224. 82 _ . .._. 736. 05 6, 291. B7 76, 498. 61- 3; 248.-15 525. 24 2, 811. 37 O. 00 5, 213. 55 11, 798. 31 0. 00 0. 00 389. 14 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 392. 15 0. 00 285. 00 0. 00 677. 15 2, 020. 59 0. 00-- 5, 0`5, 915. 61 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 240. 75 49. 3 240. 75 49. 3 99, 553. 59 25, 785. 13 74. 82- 2, 017. 00... 1, 280. 95 8. 13 --29, 016. 39 1; 451. 85 582. 61 188. 63 85.00- 2, 074. 45 4, 212. 54 534. 41 --1, 445. 00 - 115. 61- 69. 8 72. 5 106. 5 0. 0 36. 4 99. 8 •72.5• 69. 1 61. 1 93. 7 142.5 71.5 74. 7 79. 0 O. 0 101. 9 • • " • • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 4205 EQUIP SERVICE r • • r i • • ! r 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT -MY PAGE 0020. FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 9, e00. 00 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 5, 016. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL ' • 5, 016. 00 DIVISION TOTAL • 137, 019. 00 I, 042, 566. 00 DEPT: COMM PROMOTION DEPARTMENT TOTAL 4601 COMM RESOURCES 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL. 161, 997. 00 2, 000. 00 12, 760. 00 5, 809. 00 55, 000. 00 237, 566. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE-- 85, 078. 00 0I3JECT SUBTOTAL 85. 078. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4302 ADVERTISING 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN 3500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN 3500 5403 VEHICLES 10, 500. 00 4, 000. 00 8, 613. 00 13, 890. 00 350. 00 100. 00 625. 00 1, 000. 00 1, 600. 00 15, 992. 00 56, 670. 00 5, 000. 00 2, 500. 00 8, 577. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 753. 23 7, 936. 20 0. 00 417. 96 417. 96 4, 179. 60 4; 179: 60 10, 669:67 -100, 412. 72 1, 863. 80 80. 9 0. 00 836. 40 83. 3 -O. 00 836: 40 83: 3 677. 15 35, 929: 13 .......73:7 95, 342. 07 729, 109. 23 14, 928. 03 29EI, 528. 74 71. 3 V, -•.-----•-_-•_ • • •- • .-._ • • . 10, 918. 00 118, 278. 94 0. 00 43, 718. 06 73. 0 60. 17 774. 88 0. 00 1, 225. 12 3B. 7 0. 00 15; 398. 44 -0. 00 2; 638. 44- 120. 6 0. 00 4, 201. 99 0. 00 I, 607. 01 72. 3 6, 439. 31 41, 755. 75 0. 00 13, 244. 25 75. 9 17, 417. 48 - :*-- 180, 410. 00 ------- 0. 00 *. - - 57, 156. 00 . 75. 9 6, 292:16 42- ' "0: 00 -20, 985. 58 6, 292. 16 64, 092. 42 0. 00 20, 985. 58 • 0. 00 363. 56 203. 04 798. 04 30. 37 0. 00 0. 00 290. 00 12. 19- 1. 481. 00 3, 153. 82 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6, 120. 97 144. 2, 850. 11 0. 2, 961. 49 0. 3, 472. 68 256. 39 30. 23 540. 00 1, 071. 49 690. ' 0. 0. 0. 0. 11, 554. 51 0. 29. 869. 22 835. 52 00 00 66 00 00 00 00 00 00 18 4, 041. 43 181. 00 8, 577. 36 0. 00 4, 226. 1, 149. 5.651. 9, 726. 93. 69. 85. 71. - 596. 4, 437. 25, 965. 51 89 51 66 61 77 00 49- 65 49 60 777. 57 2, 500. 00 0. 36- 75. 3 75. 59. 7 71. 2 34. 3 29. 9 73. 2 30. 2 86. 4 107. 1 62. 7 72. 2 54. 1 84. 4 0. 0 100. 0 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 4601 COMM RESOURCES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: COMM PROMOTION 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 16, 077. 00 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 300. 00 2. 300. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. PAGE 0021'-" DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 12, 618. 79 189. 65 1, 704. 65 189. 65 "-` 1; 704. 65 181. 00 3, 277. 21 0. 00 595. 35 0. 00 ' -----' "595..35 79. 6 74. 1 74:1 DIVISION TOTAL 397, 691'. 00 27, 053. 11- "-..-..... 288, 695 08 --- ' _'1. _ 016. 18 .."""" --107, 979. 74 72. 8 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 397, 691. 00 27, 053. 11 6101 PARKS DEPT: PARKS/REC 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4304 TELEPHONE 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 72, 632. 00 500. 00 1, 453. 00 1. 453. 00 76, 038. 00 5, 840. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 5. 840. 00 157. 606. 00 10, 025. 62 12, 600. 00 0. 00 170, 206. 00 10, 025. 62 38, 036. 00 2, 072. 15 125. 00 29. 94 11, 600. 00 75. 54 700. 00 51. 28 1, 000. 00 0. 00 500. 00 0. 00 500. 00 0. 00 8, 902. 00 854. 00 61, 363. 00 3, 082. 91 200. 00 1. 200. 00 0. 00 1 400.00 288, 695. 08 1, 016. 18 51, 177. 85 22. 64 O. 00 699. 71 51, 900. 20 91, 12.2. 96 0. 00 91, 122. 96 33, 829. 75 249. 21 6, 469..37.- 470. 99 69. 37 -470.99 441.02 483. 00 426. 50 6, 341. 94 48, 716: 78 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 • 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -. 3, 167. 19 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -- .223744-- 0. 0. 00 289. 29 289. 29 0. 00 1, 040. 17 -1;263.61 107. 979. 74 72. 8 21. 454. 15 70. 4 477. 36 4. 5 1.;'453. 00 .._-._. _....0. 0 753. 29 48. 1 24, 137. 80 68. 2 66, 483. 04 12. 600. 00 79, 083. 04 4. 206. 25 124. 21- 1, 963. 44 229. 01 558.98 12. 00 73. 50 0. 00 2, 560. 06 3, 167. 19 9, 479. 03 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 23. 44-- 1, 200. 00 1, 040. 17- 136. 39 57. 8 0.0 53. 5 • 88. 9 199. 3 83. 0 67. 2 44. 1 97. 6 85. 3 71. 2 84. 5 111. 7 0. 0 0. 0 90. 2 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 6101 PARKS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT"""(BY'FUNDT FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: PARKS/REC PAGE--- ' - 0022- DATE 022_-DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 4, 200. 00 0. 00 4, 200. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 200. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 . ' 0. 00 ... ' 4,.200. 00 - 0. 0 DIVISION "' TOTAL----' "-"' "" 313; 207:00 .. '"".'19, 237. 82 ""'" ". "-193,-"003: 55- - ""-3 167 19.- -"117, 036:"26- 62:6-- DEPARTMENT 2:6-"--"DEPARTMENT TOTAL 313, 207. 00 19, 237. 82 193, 003. 55 3, 167. 19 117, 036. 26 62. 6 8141 CIP 89-141 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 25, 000. 00 O. 00 85. 50 O. 00 24, 914. 50 O. 3 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 25, 000. 00 O. 00 85. 50 O. 00 24, 914. 50 0. 3 DIVISION TOTAL 25, 000. 00 0. 00 85. 50 0. 00 24, 914. 50 0. 3 8142 SIDEWALK REPAIR DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 328, 064. 00 328, 064. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 328, 064. 00 0. 00 8146 CIP 89-146 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 20, 000. 00 20, 000. 00 2, 900. 00 2, 900. 00 - 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 20, 000. 00 2, 900. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 328, 064. 00 328, 064. 00 0. 0 0. 0 226. 36 0.00 226. 36- 0.0 226. 36. _._.. ... O. 00 226. 36- O. O 226. 36 " 0. 00 327; 837. 64 0. 0 2, 900. 00 2, 000. 00 1 . 321 52' 1,321.52 0. 00 0. 00 0. CO 0. 00 4, 221. 52 0. 00 17, 100. 00 17, 100. 00 1 , 321. 52- 1 , 321. 52- 14. 5 14. 5 0. 0 0. 0 • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15:03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 8176 CIP 86-176 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT "(BY'FUND)`"-"- ' PAGE 0023" FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 75.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 70, 468. 00 70, 468. 00 DIVISION TOTAL -70,"468. 00 8177 CIP 87-177 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 40, 000. 00 40, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL - 40; 000. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 483, 532. 00 8601 CIP 86-601 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4, 000. 00 4, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 4, 000. 00 8604 CIP 86-604 DEPT: BLOCS & GROUNDS I MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 . 70, 468. 00 • 0. 00 .._....._. 0. 00 --.. 0. 00 . .. -- 70, 468. 00 0. 00 - - _0...00-._.. -0:00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00- - 0. 00 0. 00 - 0: 00-- -- 0: 00 2, 900. 00 4, 533. 38 0. 00 -70-1468. 00 40, 000. 00 40, 000: 00 40; 000. 00 478, 998. 62 0. 0 O. 0 -- 0.0 0. 9 0. 00 1, 071. 24 1, 000. 00 1, 928. 76 51. 7 0. 00 1, 071. 24 1, 000. 00 1, 928. 76 51. 7 0. 00 1, 071.24 1, 000. 00 1, 928. 76 51 . 7 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 19, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 19, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 19, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 8606 CIP 87--606 DEPT: BLOCS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 8. 550. 00 8, 550. 00 8, 550. 00 68. 28 05. 78 0. 00 68. 28 05. 78 0. 00 19, 000. 00 19, 000. 00 19, 000. 00 8, 464. 22 8, 464. 22 68. 28 85. 78 0. 00 8, 464. 22 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 1. 0 1. 0 1. 0 • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17:15:03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 8609 CIP 89-609 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT"TBY-FUND) FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: BLOCS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 30,000.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL ' 30, 000. 00 DIVISION - TOTAL-- ---`. _-- .. "` "-- 30,'000. 00 • " ' 8610 CIP 88-610 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7, 000. 00 7, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL - "` "' 7, 000.00 8612 CIF 68-612 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 16, 700. 00 16, 700. 00 PAGE'"'- 0024 DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0.00 0.00' 0. 00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 -0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 30, 000. 00 0. 0 30, 000. 00 _.. -" .. 0. 0 0:-00 ----- 0. 00 ' -- ------: 30; 000: 00"'-- 0. 00 2, 485. 00 0. 00 ..--..-..._..-...2; 485. 00 0. 00 0.00 4, 515. 00 4, 515. 00 35. 5 35.5' 0. 00 - -- 27'485. 00 0. 00 - -'" -'41515: 00........-... . 35. 5 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ._...._.. -'O. 00 -- - 0. 00 .. 16,700:00 _ - _ ._. 0.00" 8613 CIP 89-613 DEPT: BLDGS I. GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 8, 000. 00 0. 00 8, 000. 00 8, 000. 00 0. 00 8614 CIP 88-614 DEPT: BLOCS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL - 136, 074. 00 136, 074. 00 16, 700. 00 0. 0 16, 700. 00 " 0. 0 --0: 00 - --- O. 00--------'---16:700.- 00---- - 0. 0 230. 50 -230: 50 0. 00 0. 00 7,769.50 -7;769.50 230. 50 - - -. 0. 00 ' ' • ' 7,769. 50 0. 00 96, 643. 89 0. 00 0. 00 ......... 96; 643. 09 -------------- 0. 00 136, 074. 00 0.00-- 96;643 Et9- --- --0. 00 8615 CIP 09-615 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 10, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 39, 430. 11 39, 430. 11 2. 8 2. 8 2. 8 •71.0 ' 71.0 - 39,' 430: 1.1.. '-' ' . 71 . 0 10, 000. 00 0. 0 • • 4_ F INANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 1 001 GENERAL FUND 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DETMENT TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT" (BV -'FUND)"-"-- _ --- "PAGE FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 75. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION 10, 000. 00 10, 000. 00 239, 324. 00 8703 CIP 89-703 DEPT' ----OTHER PROJECTS .. 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE - OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL . 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 11, 731, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 68. 28 100, 516. 41 0. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. . 0 - - . 0d 10, 000. 00 0. 0 10, 000. 00 0. 0 137, 807. 59 42. 4 0. 00 - - 5; 000. 00 O. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 042, 803. 11 8, 197, 261. 74 5, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 5, 000. 00 0. 00 5, 000. 00- 57, 087. 31 3, 476, 650. 95 0. 0 0: 0 70.3 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY'REPORT-TBY FUNu) FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUP P OR T • • • rH r r i rH r • '; 0 • • r - r .i• • 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 12, 275. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL " ' -12, 275. 00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 1, 022. 92 9, 206. 28 0. 00 3. 068. 72 75. 0 1.022. 92 206: 28 O. 00 '3.068. 72 75.0 DIVISION -TOTAL-- 12, 275. 00' -1, 022. 92 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 12, 275. 00 2601 STREET LIGHTING DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 77, 099. 00 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1, 000. 00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF -1, 533. 00 - 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 533. 00 4, 000. 00 9, 699. 00 8, 932. 00 103, 796. 00 9,-206.28 1, 022. 92 9, 206. 28 0. 00 0. 00 5, 107. 20 51, 358. 75 0. 00 11.30 0. 00 -0: 00 0. 00 1, 494. 26 0. 00 915. 00 989. 62 7, 108. 07 989. 60 7, 596. 62 7, 085. 42 68, 484. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 14, 300. 00 0. 00 6, 000. 00 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 9, 350. 00 0.00 4, 850. 58 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 23. 650. 00 0. 00 10, 850. 58 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 170, 000. 00 4304 TELEPHONE 150. 00 4309 MAINf4NANCE MATERIALS 10, 200. 00 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 2, 500. 00 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 9, 500. 00 4316 TRAINING - 500. 00 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS e, 188. oo OBJECT SUBTOTAL 201, 038. 00 5400 EQUIPMENT 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2. 000. 00 2, 000. 00 - 330, 484. 00 330, 484. 00 219. 05 8. 45 1; 037. 50 178. 76 1, 984. 24 0. 00 768. 50 4, 196. 50 3-, 068772 75:0 3, 063. 72 75. 0 0. 00 25, 740. 25 0. 00 988. 70 0. 00 17-533. 00 0. 00 38. 74 0. 00 - 3, 085. 00 0. 00 2; 590. 93 0. 00 1, 335. 38 0. 00 35, 312. 00 0. 00 8, 300. 00 0. 00 4, 499. 42' 0. 00 12, 799. 42 102, 882. 13 0. 00 67, 117.87 183. 60 0. 00 33. 60- '6;1304T 13 15 -2;808. 72 2, 247. 74 . 0. 00 3, 497. 79 0. 00 50. 00 5, 882. 42 0. 00 121, 547. 81 587. 15 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. '00- 0. 00 11, 2el. 92' 200;082739 11,281.92 587. 15 252. 26 6, 002. 21 -450.00 , 2, 305. 58 78, 903. 04 2, 000. 00 2; 000. 00 129;014. 46 66. 6 1. 1 0. 0' 97. 4 22. 8 85. 0 65. 9 . .._..... 41. 9 51.8 45. 8 60. 5 122. 4 72.4 89. 9 36. 8 10. 0 71.8 60. 7 '0. 0 • 0. 0 60. 9 200, 882. 39 587. 15 129. 014. 46 60. 9 C • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND 8201 CIP 85-201 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT • (BY• FUND)' --.-"'"- FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 30, 000. 00 30, 000. 00 DIVISION -"TOTAL""" -'"30; 000. 00 8202 CIP 85-202 DEPT: STREET LIGHTING • 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT ' 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 2, 000. 00 • 2, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0.00" 0. 00 0:00 PAGE........ ... 0027' --- DATE 04/16/90 75.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00-" ------0:0U 0. 00 825. 00 0.00 _,_____----825. 00 0: 00 0. 00 - - ----814:"94 0. 00 0. 00 814. 94 0. 00 0. 00 2, 000. 00 32, 000. 00 -374, 759. 00 • 0. 00 0. 00 340. 80 340. 80 0. 00 30, 000. 00 0. 00 30, 000:00 0.0 0. 00._...._.. - 301000 00'--------_._00-.-- 0. 00 1, 175. 00 41. 2 0. 00 --" i; 175. 00 41. 2 0. 00 014. 94- ..._.._ .. 0. 0 0. 00 814. 94- 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 980. 74 0. 00 0. 00 1 , 980. 74 0. 00 12, 304. 84 - 212;-069. 4f 587. 15 - 340. 80- 340. 80- 19. 26 30, 019. 26 -162, 102.44 0. 0 0. 0 99. 0 6. 1 56.7" F INANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ' EXPENDITURE SUMMARYREPORT---(BY-FUNDI FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION 110 PARKINQ FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT DATE 04/16/90 75. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 4300 MATER I ALS/SUPPL IES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 1, 388, 090. 00 117, 434. 67 1, 035, 786. 03 OBJECT SUBTOTAL " • • "- • " 388, 090. 00 - 117, 434. 035;786. 03 -Drvisrorr TOTAL - 1; 388, 090. 00- -117, 434. 67 17035;786.-03 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1, 388, 090. 00 -.--•--- ..•-_-_-_.•.•. .- • .- • • • . 3301 VEH PKG DIST DEPT: PKG FACILITIES 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 16, 667. 00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 312.00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 312. 00 4100 RETIREMENT 4, 006. 00 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 746. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 22, 043. 00 117, 434. 67 1, 035, 786. 03 0. 00 352, 303. 97 74. 6 0. 00 352, 303.-97 74. 6 0. 00 352, 303. 97 74. 6 286. 80 6, 583. 59 0. 00 751. 89 0.00 -0: 00 36. 08 966. 95 23. 19 411. 35 346. 07 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PR IVATE '44, 361. 00 - 3, 457. 63 .----30.-6777-04 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 44, 361. 00 3, 457. 63 30, 677. 04 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER' 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 250. 00 300. 00 1, 000. 00 843. 00 2, 393. 00 0. 00 70. 00 0. 90 138.88 0. 00 85. 65 585. 62 86. 55 1, 773. 24 O. do 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 10, 083. 41 39. 5 439. 89- 240. 9 -312: 00- 3, 039. 05 24. 1 334. 65 55..1 '0: 00 69. 1. 0. 00 13. 683. 96 69. 1 180. 00 28.0 161. 12 46. 2 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 257.38' 69.4 0. 00 619. 76 74. 1 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 0. 00 0. 00 10. 00 - 0. OQ . .. _ . 10. 00- • 0. 0 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 ' - - ' 0. 00 0. 00 ' 0. 00' -489. 37 . 489. 37-'' - 0. 0 ' ' 5420 DEPREC IATION/EQUIPF..VEH 350. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 350. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL ' ' • _ 350. 00 0. 00 10.00 489. 37 `. 149. 37- 142. 6 . • 5600 BUILD I NOS/ IMPROVEMENTS 5620 DEPREC IAT I ON/ BLDGSY., IMPRV 2, 700. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 700. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL • - 2, 700. 00 ' 0. 00 0. 00 '2, 700. 00 - 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 71, 847. 00 3302 PARKING ENF DEPT: PKG FACILITIES ' 3, 090: 25 • 417174. 06 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALAR I ES/M I SC 523, 749. 00 38, 993. 67 ' 379, 564. 82 . . 489. 37 .......30;183. 57 57. 9 0. 00 144, 184. 18 72. 4 7 •i FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 110 PARKING FUND 3302 PARKING ENF CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT "" (BY-FUNDT- FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: PKG FACILITIES 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF '-_. 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL - -- 4180 RETIREMENT 4187 UNIFORMS 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES -- 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 12, 000. 00 -11,065.00 11, 065. 00 49, 160. 00 ---5,350.00 67, 120. 00 8, 000. 00 80, 752: 00 768, 261. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES -- 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5420 DEPRECIATION/EQUIP&VEH 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 11, 000. 00 11, 000. 00 3, 000. 00 45, 000. 00 3, 378. 00 15, 000. 00 8, 000. 00 12, 000. 00 300. 00 2, 000. 00 1, 000. 00 41, 975. 00 131, 653. 00 1, 589. 00 53, 500. 00 20, 000. 00 30, 100. 00 105, 189. 00 3, 500. 00 3, 500. 00 1, 019, 603. 00 1, 091, 450. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. PAGE' '"' 0029 DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 289. 13 5, 500. 54 0. 00 645. 16 - "'4; 346:'44----- - 0. 00 731. 52 4, 861. 45 0. 00 558. 12 - 379. 31 5, 319. 37 173. 32 5, 021. 98 52, 111. 58 27, 431. 57 0. 00 3, 367. 78 0. 00 42, 000. 11 0. 00 2, 253. 57 0. 00 -'41; 270. 02 0. 00 510, 596. 30 0. 00 0. 00 2, 144. 86 0. 00 0. 00 2, 144. 86 0. 00 416. 32 5, 153. 48 0. 00 2, 932. 89 ' 475. 78 237. 88 0. 00 8.00 0. 00 4, 132. 40 13, 356. 75 -" 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 114. 40 114.40 65, 582. 73 2, 940. 33 0. 00 -24, 741.- 82" "-49. 95" 2, 444. 00 0. 00 10, 525. 59 50. 17 5, 385: 54' 19. 97 5, 284. 39 1, 825. 09 200. 00 0. 00 1'; 015: 86 99. 00 428. 00 0. 00 29, 577. 58 0. 00 82; 543: 1 I "- 2; 044. 18 ---611- 69- 1, 651. 39 0. 00 29, 180. 87 - 31, 451. 95 -O. 00 489. 37 0. 00 0. 00 489. 37 1, 027. 60 0. 00 1, 027. 60 0. 00 627, 763. 82 69, 472. 98 668, 937. 88 2, 533. 55 3, 022. 92 6, 499. 46 45. 8 _.._-6, 718: 56.--_..-_39. 2...-. 6, 203. 55 43. 9 21, 728. 43 55. 8 1; 982. 22' -- 62. 9 ---- 25, 119. 89 62. 5 5, 746. 43 28. 1 - 39; '481.98...---- 51.1 -- 257, 664. 70 66. 4 8, 855. 14 8, 855. 14 59. 67 23..---..... 934. 00 4, 424. 24 --'2; 594. 49 __--- ..._. 4, 890. 52 100. 00 14... 572. 00 12, 397. 42 47, 065.71 ... 19. 4 19. 4 98. 0 55. 0 72. 3 70. 5 67. 5' 59. 2 66. 6 55. 7 42. 8 70. 4 64. 2 977. 31 -38. 4 51, 359. 24 20, 000. 00 911113 73, 247. 68 2,472.40 2,472.40 389, 305. 63 4. 0 0. 0 96. 9 30. 3 61. 8 419, 489.20 61.5 • | � rzmomcs-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 --- CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -- '-'-- ' ' EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT'-IovFowo1 FROM '03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 75. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE z 110 PARKING FUND . 8148 CIP 89-148 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 10.000.00 0. 00 0. 00 o oo 10, 000. oo o o DIVISION - ---xo.000:-on 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1o.000�oo O. 00 428701 CIP 89-701 DEPT: OTHER PROJECTS 00 CONTRACT nowrnAcr asnvInsa--'---'-------- *2o1 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE o.uoo.00 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 000. 00 0. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER *309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 ° , i • 000 o.00 10, 000. 00 o.0 0. 00 0. 00 ». «» o. oo 192.15 192. 15 192. 15---------19z:-IS 0. 00' 5, 000. 00 0. 0 5, 000. 00 0. 0 192. 15- u.o DIVISION rorAc- -------� 5.000.00' 192.15''-----'19271 o. ou ------418or.o5- o.o - \ DEPARTMENT TOTAL 5, 000. 00 FUND TOTAL 2, 494, 540. 00 192. 15 192. 15 187.099.00 1.704.916.06 0. 00 4.807.85 3.022.92 786.601.02 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT '(BY FUND) TIME 17:15:03 FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND APPROPRIATION 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION -TOTAL- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8150 CIP 89-150 47, 272. 00 47, 272. 00 47; 272. 00 47, 272. 00 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 3, 939. 33 35, 453. 97 3, 939:33 ' 35, 453. 97 3, 939T33---- 35;"453-97 3,939.33 35, 453. 97 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 15, 000. 00 O. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 15, 000. 00 0. 00 O. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 15, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY PAGE DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 . 8160 CIP 85-160 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 0.00 0.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL O. 00 0.00 O. 00 DIVISION TOTAL O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 8170 CIP 87-170 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 0. 00 11, 818. 03 0. 00 1 1, 818. 03 O. 00- --1I;818:-03---- 0. "-11818: 03 -"0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES. 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 337, 219. 00 O. 00 136. 32 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 337, 219. 00 0. 00 136. 32 DIVISION TOTAL 337, 219. 00 0. 00 136. 32 8171 CIP 87-171 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - - 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 21, 305. 00 O. 00 136. 32 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 21, 305. 00 O. 00 136. 32 DIVISION TOTAL 21,305.00 11, 813. 03 15, 000. 00 15, 000. 00 74. 9 74:9'" 74. 9 0. 0 0. 0 15, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 O. 0 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 337, 082. 68 0. 0 0. 00 337, 082. 68 0. 0 0. 00 337, 082. 68 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 136. 32 0. 00 21, 168. 68 21, 168. 68 0. 6 0. 6 21, 168. b8 0.6 r r FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17:15:03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 115 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 8171 CIP 87-171 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ' EXPENDITURE- SUMMARY -REPORT -TBY'-FUND, FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER • c • DEPARTMENT TOTAL -- -' 373, 524. 00 FUND TOTAL - 420, 796. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 3, 939.33 35, 726. 61 PAGE - 0032........... DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE • 0. 00 ' "'" 373,-251: 36 ' ' 0. 00 385, 069. 39 8. 4 c r r r:. • H I F INANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT -(BY FUND) -----"- FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION "`TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 5, 000. 00 __ -- 5, 000. 00 "5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 PAGE ............. 0033. _ ..._...... DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 5, 000. 00 0. 00- _.._._.___._ 5. 000. 00 0 00 0. 00 0. 00 000. OU 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 0. 00 0.00- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 100. 0 100:0 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 100. 0 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15:03 _•-.•-, • _ FUND DIV OBJT DESCR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT(1Y"FUNDY FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES • ' • • 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 5, 000. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL ' • PAGE.- 0034 DATE 04/16/90 75. 0%. OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 416. 66 3, 750. 01 O. 00 1, 249. 99 75. 0 -- 416. 66 3, 750. 01. O. 00 • • 1, 249. 99 75. 0 -- DIVISION " -5; 000. 00 416: 66-- 01 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 5, 000. 00 416. 66 3, 750. 01 8506 CIP 86-506 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 26, 570. 00 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 26, 570. CO 0. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 000. 00 ----- 5, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 31; 570. 00 8508 CIP 87-508 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 52, 500. 00 ----- 52. 500. 00 2, 500. 00 2, 500. 00 55, 000. 00 86, 570. 00 91, 570. 00 0. 00 1, 249: 0.00 1, 249. 99 75. 0 0. 00 0. 00 26, 570. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 26, 570. 00 0. 0 0. 00 4. 846. 81 0. 00 -4; 846:. 81 0.00 0. 00 153. 19 96. 9 -153. 19 96. 9 0. 00 ---4; 846.. et- -o.. oo - 267723.-19.*-- - 15. 3 0. 00 10, 536. 59 0. 00 41,963.41 20. 0 0. 00 • - 10, 536. O. 00 . 41;963.41 20. 0 0. 00 .2; 379: 29* - -0. 00 0. 00 2, 379. 29 0. 00 120. 71 120. 71 95.1 95. 1 0. 00 12.915. 8B 0. 00 42, 084. 12 23. 4 0. 00 - . *- -17;.762: 69 -0: 00 - - -.68, 807. 31 20. 5 416. 66 21, 512. 70 0. 00 70, 057. 30 - 23. 4 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (13Y- FUND) FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION 126 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND... 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL"""" DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8514 CIP 89-514 15, 000. 00 1 5, 000. 00 --_ 15.000.00 15, 000. 00 DEPT: PARKS • 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5500 LAND 5501 LAND OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 . PAGE ._..-..._- 0035 DATE 04/16/90 75.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 15, 000. 00 15, 000 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 100. 0 100:0' 0. 00--------15;-000. DO 0. 00- _' -- 0. 00-- 100: 0. 00 15, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 26. 40 0. 00 0. 00 26. 40 1, 578, 004. 00 - 1. 578, 004. 00 145, 545. 00 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 26. 40- 0. 00 26. 40- 0. 00 1, 568, 003. 77 0. 00 0. 0 0. 0 10, 000. 23 99. 3 0. 00 .. 11568;003:7T- 0. 00 ....- 10; 000. 23 _...__._.-. 99: 3 0. 00......... 145; 545:00 ---.._ -- 0. 0. 00 ..__..... 0. 00 _..... 100. 0 145, 545. 00 0. 00 1, 723, 549. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1;723, 549. 00 FUND TOTAL 1,738. 549. 00 145, 545. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 713, 575. 17 0. 00 O. 00 .... ....1. 713. 575-17 - 0. 00- 0. 00 1, 728. 575. 17 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 9, 973. 83 • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17:15:03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 127 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER I • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT- (BY FUND')"' - FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 1, 354, 771.00 112, 897.58 1, 016, 078.22 OBJECT SUBTOTAL " - 1;354,771.00 112,897.5B-- 1,016,078:22- DIVISION ;016,078:22- DIVISION " -" 11354;771: 00"-'" "-"'112; 897.-58---"I; 016,-"078. 22 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1, 354, 771. 00 112, 897. 58 1, 016, 078. 22 FUND TOTAL 1, 354, 771. 00 112, 897. 58 1, 016, 078. 22 0. 00 338, 692. 78 74. 9 '0. 00 '" """ 338, 692. 78 -- 74.9 - 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 338; '692:78 - 74 338, 692.7 8 74.9 338, 692. 78 74. 9 Oa • • r-, r. !! FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • • • EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY- FUND)-- PAGE - 0037 FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 2 75. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GR 4701 HOUSING REHAB DEPT: OTHER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 92, 072. 00 2, 555. 30 2, 555. 30 92, 072. 00 2, 555. 30 2555. 30 DIVISION -TOTAL-- 92,-072. 00 2r555.3077 4702 PROJECT TOUCH DEPT: OTHER • 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 7, 670. 00 0. 00 1, 450. 00 0. 00 . 6, 220. 00 18. 9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL • 7.670. 00 0. 00- I, 450:00 O. 00 -6, 220. 00 18. 9 0. 00 89,516.70 2.7 0. 00 -89, 516.70 ' 2. 7 -- ' 0. 00 89, 516770 2. 7 ! DIVISION TOTAL- 7, 670. 00 O. 00 1r45000 0. 00 6220: 00- Is: 9• • 4703 CDBG ADMIN DEPT: OTHER r-. 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PR IVATE 12, 276. 00 741. 30 8, 470. 47 O. 00 3, S05. 53 69. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 12, 276. 00 741. 30 8, 470. 47 O. 00 .3, 805. 53 --- 69. 0 r, ! i r; r • • 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL O. 00 •41: 10 41.7-10 -0.00 *41:10- 0. 00 41. 10 41. 10 O. 00 41. 10- 12. . 276. 00 4704 S. B. FREE CLINIC - DEPT: OTHER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4. 200. 00 4, 200. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 4, 200. 00 4705 JUVENILE DIVSN DEPT:-- OTHER 782. 40 8, 511. 57 0. 00 3, 764. 43 0. 0 00 69. 3 0. 00 2; 100. 00 0. 00 • - 2, 100. 00 50. 0 0. 00 2, 100. 00 0. 00 2, 100. 00 0. 00 2, 100. 00 0. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE - 3, 000. 00 0. 00 OBJECT SUB TOTAL 3, 000. 00 0. 00 50. 0 2, 100. 00 50. 0 752785 0. 00 2, 247. 15 752. 85 0. 00 2, 247. 15 • 25. 0 25. 0 '• • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 - EXPENDITURE SUMMARY'REPORT--(BY-FUNUT 41, TIME 17:15:03 FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 PAGE-- 0038 DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE H. FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GR • • 011 r r! r- 0 DIVISION TOTAL 3. 000. 00 0. 00 4706 S. B. COAL ALIVE - DEPT: OTHER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 253.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 253.00 0.00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 752. 85 0. 00 2, 247. 15 , 25. 0 252.68 0. 00 0. 32 99. 8 252. 68 0. 00 0. 32 99. 8 DIVISION TOTAL 253.00 0.00 252.68 4707 1736 FAM CR CTR DEPT: OTHER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 2,544.00 0.00 2,544.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2,544.00 0. 00 2, 544. CO 0. 00 0. 32 99.8 0. 00 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 0. 00 100. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 2, 544. 00 0. 00 2, 544. 00 0. 00 0. 00 100.0 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 122,015.00 3,337.70 18,166.40 0.00 103,842.60 14.8 FUND TOTAL 122,015.00 -3,337_70 -----18;-166740-- -- -- - -0. 00 --'-'103848:60-- ' 14:0- A‘ ! ; • I. 1 I f • • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER r • •I t` e 'I 1 ri1 -1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT "(BY -FUND)"`--'-' FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL • - -- DIVISION - TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3401 DIAL. A RIDE 0. 00 - 0.00 O. 00 0, 00 DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 14, 958. 00 1, 888. 00 I ; 439. 00 18, 285. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 136,094.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 136,094.00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES - " 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 50. 00 ---_- 500. 00 88. 00 638. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 155, 017. 00 3402 COMMUTER BUS DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES -- 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS " OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 5, 403. 00 681. 00 --- - 549. 00 6, 633. 00 49, 000. 00 49, 000. 00 PAGE.....__.._0039. ..----- DATE 04/16/90 75. 0Y. OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 0. 00 - 0. 00 0:"' 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 • ..... 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00• -----'--"__ 0: 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 256. 92 11, 458. 60 150. 30 1, 246. 78 131. 63 •-------"825: 59 1, 538. 05 13, 530. 97 0. 00 27, 085. 50 0. 00 27, 085. 50 4. 16 33. 28 28. 02 28. 47 7. 29 66. 61 39. 47 128. 36 1, 578. 32 40, 744. 83 449. 70 54. 42 45. 54 549. 66 4, 024. 24 452. 39 298:92 4, 775. 55 0. 00 0. 00 3, 499. 40 0. 00 641. 22 '0.0d 0. 00 4, 754. 03 0. 0 0. 0 76. 6 66. 0 57:3 - . 74. 0 0. 00 109, 008. 50 19. 9 0. 00 109, 008. 50 19. 9 0. 00 -0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 16. 72 66. 5 471. 53- 5. 6 21.39 75.6 509. 64 20. 1 0. 00 114, 272. 17 26. 2 0. 00 1 , 378. 76 74. 4 0. 00 228. 61 66. 4 0. 00 .... __. --- - 250. 08 - ._.... 54. 4 0. 00 1, 857. 45 71. 9 0. 00 11, 695. 09 0. 00 11, 695. 09 52. 00 4. 64 0. 00 0. 00 37. 56 0. 00 37, 304. 91 37, 304. 91 14. 44 23. 8 23. 8 72. 2 • • r • r- (S S. • - 4f • • • r FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND . _ 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER • OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT- (BY FUNDY' FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 PAGE-- 0040 • • ---- ;- DATE 04/16/90 75. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 52. 00 4. 64 ____.•----- _••-_-••-- • . 37. 56 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 55, 685. 00 554. 30 3403 BUS PASS SUBSDY DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 1, 664. 00 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 0. 00 4180 RETIREMENT •216. 00 4128 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 149. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 029. 00 16, 508. 20 14. 44 72. 2 0. 00 39, 176. 80 29. 6 128. 40 0. 00 16. 06 14. 26 158. 72 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 12, 773. 00 2, 892. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL • •- -12, 773. 00 2, 892. 00 4300 MATER I ALS/SUPPL IES/OTHER 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS '875: 00 - OBJECT SUBTOTAL e75. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 15, 677. 00 3406 CIRC ELEMENT ---- DEPT:- PUBL IC TRANSIT 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE '17, 735. 00 OBJECT SUB TOTAL 17, 735. 00 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8149 CIP 90--149 DEPT: 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL . 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 17, 735. 00 • 244, 114. 00 STREET/SAFETY 25, 000. 00 ' ' •25, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 603. 86 0. 61 T39. 92 119. 94 864. 33 0. 00 1, 060. 14 36. 2 0. 00 0. 61- 0. 0 0. 00 29.-06 80. 4 0. 00 1, 164. 67 42. 5 9, 034. 00 9, 034:-00 '92.-53 597. 92- 92. 53 597. 92 0. 00 3, 739. 00 70. 7 0. 00 3;-739: 00 70. 7' 3, 143. 25 10, 496. 25 0. 00 0. 00 277. 08 68. 3 66. 9 0. 00 5, 180. 75 457. 32 469:3a O. oo ---17-; 265. '68' • • ' 2. 6 ' 457. 32 469. 32 0. 00 17, 265. 68 • 2.6 457.32 5,733.19 469. 32 0. 00 . 17, 265. 68 _ 68, 21B. 60 ---- • 0. 00 , 175, 895. 40 0. 00 40. 23 0. 00 4023 539. 04 539. 04 2. 6 27. 9 0. 00 24, 959. 77 0. 1 0. 00 24, 959. 77 0. 1 1;110. 92• •0. 00 1, 110. 92 0. 00 92- 0.0 1, 110. 92- 0.0 • 1 •. ri • • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17:15:03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 145 GRANT FUND 8149 CIP 90-149 r• • DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL- CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ' EXPENDITURE' SUMMARY REPORT-"YBY""FUND-)- FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 25, 000. 00 25, 000. 00 269,114. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. PAGE 0041 DATE 04/16/90 75.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 539. 04 1, 151. 15 539. 04 1, 151. 15 6 272 23 0. 00 23, 848. 85 0. 00 23, 848. 85 4. 6 4. 6 697369775 U. 00 -199 744-25-- 25:'7-- • 1• ri I FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT "(BY FUNDI"" - FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION 150 GRANT FUND 8102 .CIP 85-102 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY .PAGE..._ . ..0042 ' i DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 1 J 1: MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE /. 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 188, 051. 00 0. 00 120, 133. 30 0. 00 67, 917. 70 63. 8 OBJECT SUBTOTAL --IBS, 051: 00 0. 00 - -"'- 120; 133:-30----" -"'O. 00' ' - 67, 917:'70 "-. .. 63. 9. DIVISION --"TOTAL---"..- - 8137 CIF 85-137 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 68,366.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL •- -' 68, 366. 00 DIVISION- 'TOTAL 8151 CIP 89-151 ----68; 366. 00 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL . ...- 0:-00 -'120, 133. 30 0. 00 .0. 00 0. 00 67T-9177-70-- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 .0: 00 DIVISION TOTAL ' - 0.00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 256,417.00 8512 CIP 89-512 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ' 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 58, 000. 00 58, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 58, 000. 00 r •j 8516 CIP 89-516 DEPT: PARKS 0. 00 68, 366. 00 0. 0 -O: 00 - ' 366:00 0 0 0. 00 68; 366 00 0: 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0: 00 ... _ _.. 0. 0- -- 0.' 00 0. 00 120, 133. 30 0. 00 136, 283. 70 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 58, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 58.000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0o s8, 000. 00 46. 8 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 5400 EQUIPMENT - ._.. .._ r .I 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 7, 958. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 958. 00 0. 0 • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7, 958. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 958. 00 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 7, 958. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 958. 00 0. 0 r • • I' i FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 160 SEWER FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT' (BY FUND)' FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL-' DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3, 289. 00 3, 289. 00 3, 289. 00 3, 289. 00 3102 SEWER/ST DRAIN DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES' 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900'LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL ....._ 8405 CIP 86--405 DEPT: 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 154,000.00 94, 302. 00 1, 500. 00 1, 878. 00 2, 329. 00 11, 361. 00 9, 923. 00 120, 293. 00 2, 700. 00 2, 850. 00 5, 550. 00 500. 00 7, 500. 00 800. 00 2, 025. 00 0. 00 27, 251. 00 38, 076. 00 9, 070. 00 9, 070. 00 172, 989. 00 • 172, 989. 00 • SANITARY SEWER MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 274. 17 274.17- 274. 74.17' - 274:" 17 274. 17 7, 208. 50 222. 69 0. 00 0. 00 1, 026. 05 552. 58 9, 009. 82 -PAGE" 0045 DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 2, 467. 53 0. 00 921. 47 75. 0 2, 467. 53 - --- O. 00 ' - 821: 47" ............-.75.0 *- -2,- --2, 467. '53 2, 467. 53 62, 517. 23 1, 864. 64 -- 0. 00 2, 328. 98 7, 859. 84 -----"' 5, 056: 87 79, 627. 56 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 . ..... 52. 53 145. 33 92. 90 216.41 0. 00 2, e11. 00 3, 3113. 17 748. 32 748.32 13, 076. 31 662. 42 0. 00 -662: 662: 42 • -364. 47- 6, 633. 12 600. 86 2, 817. 23 0. 00 18, 816. 69 29, 232. 37 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -_. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 • 0. 00 699. 57 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 699. 57 7; 483. 2d - - 0. 00 7, 483. 20 0. 00 117, 005. 55 13,076. 31 117; 005:55- 0. 00 151, 983. 75 699. 57 821. 47 31, 784. 77 364. 64- 1; 87e. oo--....- 0. 02 3, 501. 16 •3, 866. 13 -..... 40, 665. 44 2, 037. 58 2, 850. 00 4, 887. 58 • 135. 53 167. 31 199. 14 792.23- 0. 00 8, 434. 31 8, 144. 06 • 1; 586. 80 1, 586. 80 55, 283. 88 75.0 66. 2 124. 3 0. 0 ... 99. 9 69. 1 '56: 6' 66. 1 24. 5 0.0. 11. 9 72.8 97. 7 .75. 1 139. 1 0. 0 69. 0 78. 6 , 82. 5 82. 5 68. 0 699. 57 -- 55:•283:-68------68.0 0. 00 2, 016. 25 98. 6 • r-; I ' r ' r r ri r • • . r FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) ---- PAGE • 0046 FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 75. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPR IATION 160 SEWER FUND 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 154, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 154, 000. 00 8406 CIP 88-406 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES • ' - " 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PR IVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 80, 000, 00 80, 000. 00 DIVISION -TOTAL 80, 000. 00 8407 CIP 88-407 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PR IVATE 14, 500. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 14, 500. 00 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 14, 500. 00 . . 248, 500. 00 FUND TOTAL 424. 778. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 0. 00 151, 983. 75 0. 00 2, 016. 25 98. 6 0. 00 151, 983. 75 6, 583. 02 6. 583. 02 6, 583. 02 6, 583. 02 0. 00 2, 016. 25 98. 6 0. 00 0. 00 6, 583. 02 6, 583. 02 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 • • 0. 00 6. 583. 02 19, 933. 50 73, 416. 98 73. 416. 98 8. 2 8. 2 73,416.98 8.2 0. 00 14. 500. 00 0. 0 0. 00 14, 500. 00 0. 0 ___..... _._.. . .... , 0.00 0.00 . • • - _ • • • 158, 566. 77 0. 00 278: 039.85 14. 500. 00 89. 933. 23 699. 57 146, 038. sa 0. 0 63. 0 65. 6 0 nl r • • et FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15:03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT-(BY'FUND) "" - " PAGE"" 0047 "_....- FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL -- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2103 SPEC INVESTGTNS MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -.._._. O. 00 O. 00 DEPT: POLICE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES • 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4322 UNCLASSIFIED 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EGUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS - OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 0. 00 158, 692. 00 • 10, 560. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 800. 00 172. 052. 00 8, 000. 00 8, 000. 00 4, 560. 00 6, 000. 00 0. 00 5, 000. 00 14, 516. 00 30, 076. 00 4, 000. 00 25, 600. 00 29, 600. 00 0. 00 0. 00 239, 728 00 • 0.'00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.. 00 0. 00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 1 1, 003. 00 91, 921. 50 660. 00 "- -- "-- 5 720. 00-- 3, 0-- 3, 275. 50 21, 542. 96 2, 535. bB 4, 994. 68 • 175. 02 -- -1, 575. 18 17, 649. 20 125. 754. 32 0. 00 5, 489. 55 0. 00 5, 489. 55 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 298. 88 1 . 298. 88 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 18, 948. 08 0. 00 0. 00 ... _. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00......._._.... 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 66, 770. 50 57. 9 O. 00 ..... •4; 840. 00 --.. _..... 54. 1 0. 00 21, 542. 96- 0. 0 0. 00 4, 994. 68- 0. 0 • 0. 00 ---- 1; 224. 82 56. 2 0. 00 46, 297. 68 73. 0 0. 00 0. 00 2, 510. 45 2, 510. 45 68. 6 68. 6 0. 00 0.00 4, 560. 00 0. 0 • O. 00 .. _ ...._ ... O. 00 .. ---- 6; 000. 00. - . .. 0. 0 • 0.00 215. 00 215.00- O.0 1 , 760. 69 0. 00 3, 239. 31 35. 2 10, 618. 72..__._...._........... . O. 00 • 3, 897. 28.....__..- 73. 1 • 12, 379. 41 215. 00 17, 481. 59 41. 8 127. 00 23, 637. 68 23, 764. 68 - 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 167, 387. 96 215. 00 3, 873. 00 1, 962. 32 5, 035. 32 3. 1 92. 3 80. 2 0:00 0.0 0. 00 0. 0 72, 125. 04 69. 9 I� FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17:15:03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 170 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 2103 SPEC INVESTGTNS • I 4 r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT'--(BY-FUNDY FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: POLICE 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER DEPARTMENT TOTAL--- FUND OTAL''FUND TOTAL ' -239, 728. 00 DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 18, 948. 08 - 1671387796 239, 728. 00 18, 948. 08 167, 387. 96 215. 00 72, 125. 04 " 69. 9 215. 00 72, 125. 04 69. 9 3 • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17:15:03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR - ISO FIRE PROTECTION FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT 'TBY'"FUND3 -' PAGE'0049--------;• FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 -0.00 DIVISION TOTAL - 0.00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2202 HYDRANT UPGRADE 0. 00 DEPT: FIRE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES-- ' 40 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4396 TRSFR OUJT-INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 170, 792. 00 170, 792. 00 325. 00 325. 00 171, 117. 00 171, 117. 00 171, 117. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 0:00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 0. 00 0:00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 27. 00 27. 00 19, 654. 94 19, 654. 94 18, 157. 00 132, 980. 06 18, 157. 00 132, 980. 06 243. 06 243:06- 0. 00 81. 94 0. 00 - 81. 94 27. 00 19, 898:: 00' - -- 18, 157. 00 27. 00 19, 898. 00 18, 157. 00 27. 00 19, 898. 00 18, 157. 00 -133; 062. 00.- 133, 0-133, 062. 00 133, 062. 00 22. 2 22. 2 22. 2 r. • • i FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17:15:03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 705 INSURANCE FUND 1209 LIABILITY INS • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT'--YBY'"FUNDT FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF ----- 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS"'""" OBJECT SUBTOTAL • 21, 094. 00 407. 00 407. 00 2, 654. 00 27, 387. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES-` 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 297.448.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 297,448.00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP ' 4316 TRAINING 4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EGUIPMENT-LESS THAN $500" -- OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 500. 00 -176.'00 - 275. 00 72, 000. 00 72, 951. 00 400. 00 400. 00 398, 186. 00 1210 AUTO/PROP/BONDS MGMT/SUPPORT 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL '30, 850. 00 30, 850. 00 8. 000. 00 e. 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 30.850.00 1215 UNEMPLOYMENT DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4186 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 25.577.00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. PAGE - • • ' 0050 "' "" DATE 04/16/90 75.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 1, 051.62 14, 767. 85 497. 20 1, 038. 40 219. 25 1, 738. 16 272. 89 " - -' " I ; 990. 38 2, 289. 21 19, 683. 04 23, 927. 55 23, 927. 55 3. 30 175. 00 0. 00 179. 00 357. 30 0. 00 0. 00 26, 574. 06 259, 008. 05 259, 008. 05 113. 18 147. 96 52, 602. 82 O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6, 326. 15 70. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 158. 75 60. 9 631. 40- 255. 1 915. 84 65. 4 7, 703. 96 71. 8 0. 00 39, 439. 95 97. 0 0. 00 38, 439. 95 87. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 331, 918. 05 958. 50 24;-000.90 858. 50 24, 000. 90 3, 123. 80 3, 123. 80 3, 982.- 30 3, 357. 04 3, 357. 04 27, :357. 94 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 616. 82 4, 616. 82 4, 616. 82 4, 916. 91- 16, 052. 08 0. 00 386. 82 22. 6 187.00 - 206. 2 -- 127. 04 53. B 19, 397. 18 73. 0 19, 724. 04 ..._. _.... 72. 9 400. 00 400. 00 o: 0 0.0 66, 267. 95 83. 3 6, 849. 10 ._ .. 77. 7 6, 849. 10 77. 7 26. 14 26.14 6, 875. 24 99. 6 99. 6 82. 3 9, 524. 92 62. 7 : • • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 705 INSURANCE FUND 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL • DIVISION TOTAL 1217 WORKERS COMP DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN -" 4180 RETIREMENT 4182 WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4316 TRAINING OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1218 MEDICARE DEPT:" 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS - OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: • 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT "(BY FUND) - FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 APPROPRIATION 25, 577. 00 25, 577. 00 MGMT/SUPPORT 26, 752. 00 520. 00 520. 00 3, 366. 00 207, 000. 00 4, 225. 00" 242, 383. 00 29, 605. 00 28, 605. 00 200.00 1: 220. 00 • 1, 420. 00 272, 408. 00 MONT/SUFFORT 33, 079. 00 33, 079. 00 33, 079. 00 MGMT/SUPPORT " 0. 00 • 0. 00 0 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 4, 916.91- 16, 052. 08 -PAGE- 0051 DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 4, 916. 91- 0. 00 16, 052. 08 0. 00 1, 555. 89 229. 55 497. 20 282. 68 32, 545. 48 383. 1 1 35, 493. 91 2, 666. 68 2, 666. 68 19, 195. 70 229.55 1': 038: 40 2, 231. 64 152, 519. 42 2, 832: 54 178, 047. 25 23, 411. 04 23, 411.04 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 " " 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 9,524.92 9,524.92 62. 7 62. 7 7, 556. 30 290. 45 518. 40- - 1, 134. 36 71. 7 44. 1 ---199. 6 ' _ .. 66. 2 54, 480. 58 73. 6 ""- -1, 392. 46 -" 67. O 64, 335. 75 73. 4 5, 193. 96 5, 193. 96 81. 8 81. 8 121. 44 . 219. 78 0. 00 19. 78- 109. 8 0. 00 143. 99 -- 0. 00 • -----11076. 01..- ... .11. 8 121. 44 363. 77 0. 00 1.056. 23 25. 6 33, 282. 03 201, 822. 06 2, 894. 07 2, 094. 07 2, 894. 07 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 24, 062. 01 24, 062. 01 24, 062. 01 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 70, 585. 94 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 74. 0 IJ 13 9,-016: 99-' -'-. 72. 7 9, 016. 99 72 7 9, 016. 99 72. 7 0:00 .." 0.0 0.00 0.0 0. 00 0. 0 •',I r- FINANCE-FA454 TIME 17: 15: 03 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH "EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT "-'(BY-FUNII) FROM 03/01/90 TO 03/31/90 705 INSURANCE FUND 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER •I • r • DATE 04/16/90 75.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. DEPARTMENT TOTAL.- "' " -- -768 100.- 00 ' 66; 915:55----6(31-12127-1-4 FUND TOTAL REPORT TOTALS 768, 100. 00 66, 815. 55 601, 212. 14 20, 617, 164. 00 1, 280, 237. 62 14, 231, 081. 52 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 47616. 82' 4, 616. 82 93, 373. 00 162.-271:04 "78.8 162,271. 04 6, 292, 709. 48 78. 8 69. 4 2 3 4 7 CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - MARCH 1990 ft FUND NUMBER GENERAL ACCOUNT 3/1/90 BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENTS WARRANTS ADJUSTMENTS 3/31/90 BALANCE 001 GENERAL 105 LIGHTING 110 PARKING 115 STATE GAS TAX 120 COUNTY GAS TAX 125 PARK REC.FAC.TAX 126 RAILROAD RT.OF WAY 127 6% UTILITY USERS TAX 140 CDBG 145 PROPOSITION A FUND 150 GRANT FUND 155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE 170 POLICE ASSET SEIZURE 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 317,608.40 705 SELF INSURANCE FUND 449,702.11 $10,351,746.65 DISTRICT $3,058,399.47 1,378,922.94 71,508.99 441,761.50 32,944.68 1,725,709.51 342,666.34 32,909.41 121,523.13 364,863.75 132,287.32 58,966.18 1,740,904.06 45,068.86 TRUST ACCOUNTS $ 402,838.26 - 0- 286,387.54 22,789.65 -0- 12,870.00 100,492.64 135,286.07 1,967.00 22,641.00 - 0- - 0- 814.01 5,338.46 5,914.00 - 0- $ 997,338.63 $171,814.50 9,943.35 515.65 3,602.18 237.56 12,444.02 -0- 237.31 -0- 2,631.02 1,365.67 425.20 108,809.50 324.99 2,290.26 74,930.89 $ 389,572.10 $ 784,017.09 $132,389.45 11,275.70 1,940.18 85,078.23 122,727.63 - 0- 3,939.33 - 0- -0- - 0- 416.66 - 0- -0- -0- 112,897.58 3,296.60 41.10 6,030.19 132.48 -0- -0- 3,516.02 556.00 16,877.87 3,178.07 15,155.62 1,298.88 - 0- 27.00 76,452.47 10,027.74 $1,001,699.79 $ 389,572.10 $2,716,645.69 1,375,650.41 150,606.32 464,214.00 33,182.24 1,750,606.87 443,158.98 55,535.21 120,152.43 383,973.10 133,652.99 55,319.36. 1,830,471.63 34,277.81 325,785.66 438,152.79 $10,311,385.49 BALANCE RECEIVED PAID BALANCE STATEMENT BALANCE PAYROLL $9,679,591.10 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $1,596.07 $325,593.08 $525,593.05 INACTIVE DEPOSIT HELD BY FISCAL AGENT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY $670,005.77 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE $552,268.53 $551,898.36 $1,966.24 ARY :RUTSC , CITY T ASU ER APRIL 18, 1990 GENERAL $ PAYROLL OUTSTANDING CHECKS INACTIVE DEPOSIT BALANCE 503,631.84 1,760.24 505,392.08 197,224.53 308,167.55 10,005,184.18 10,313,351.73 1dc) March 28, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 10, 1990 TRUCK PURCHASE - BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: Authorize the purchase of a 1990 Nissan pick-up truck for the Building & Safety Department'. Background: The purchase of the above mentioned vehicle was included in the FY 89-90 City Council adopted budget .to replace a 1975 Datsun, in which it has been determined that the cost of the necessary repairs would be well in excess of the worth of the vehicle. The budgeted amount for the purchase was $10,000. Analysis: The notice inviting bids was advertised in the Easy Reader on March 15, 1990 and March 22, 1990. In addition, a notice of bid was sent to several South Bay dealerships. Three bids were received. (The bids are available for review in the office of the City Clerk). The bids are as follows: South Bay Nissan $9,834.19 Sales Tax @ 6.757 663.81 Manufacturers Rebate -1,200.00 Total $9,298.00 Manhattan Beach Ford .. $9,047.50 Sales Tax @ 6.757 610.70 Total $9,658.84 Champion Chevrolet $10,025.25 Sales Tax @ 6.757 676.70 Total $10,701.95 As a municipality, the city is exempt from registration fees. lf Fiscal Impact: FY 89-90 Adopted Budget $10,000.00 Amount of bid 9,298.00 Respectfully Submitted, William Grove Director of Building & Safety Concur: evin B. North %aft City Manager - 2 Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director April 2, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 10, 1990 Street Lighting and Crossing Guard Assessment Districts Report on Charges Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. Background The City Council requested a report on charges to the Lighting and Crossing Guard Districts at the meeting of March 13, 1990; a report was presented at the March 27, 1990 meeting. Additional information was requested and is attached. Analysis The report presented on March 27th has been modified to break out salaries and benefits. A copy of the expenditure summary for each district as of 2/28/90 is attached which shows actual expenditures for that period. Copies of explanation pages from the 89-90 Budget are also attached, showing percentages of personnel charged to the Lighting and Crossing Guard Districts. Benefits are allocated using these same percentages. As indicated in the previous report, the cost allocation plan being prepared by DMG and Associates will determine actual costs associated with the districts. Noted: Kevin B. North aft Viki Copeland City Manager Finance Director ig Street Lighting District Budget 1989-90 Street Lighting Division, Operating Costs Salaries Benefits Contract Services (Assessment engineer, traffic signal maintenance - CALTRANS Materials, supplies, utilities Vehicle used 1/2 ton pickup) Capital Improvement Projects CIP 102, CIP 201, CIP 202, $ 85,435 18,361 23,650 201,038 2,000 $330,484 Widen Highland Avenue $ 7,775 Light Conversions/ New Installations 30,000 Hermosa Avenue/Pier Avenue Lighting 2,000 $ 39,775 Administration 4,500 $374,759 % of total 23% 5% 6% 54% 1% 0 89% 10% 1% Crossing Guard District Budget 1989-90 Crossing Guard District, % of total Operating Costs Salaries Benefits (Crossing Guards, $33,321, 51% of total) Contract Services Materials, Supplies Administration $45,942 4,641 8,900 1,814 $61,297 $ 4,500 $65,797 70% 7% 14% 2% 93% 7% CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET 1989-1990 DEPARTMENT: CROSSING GUARDS -GENERAL SERVICES OBJECT CODES AUTHORIZED 88-89 DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION 89-90 4102 Director Coordinator Crossing Guards .05 .20 9.00 9.25 .05 .20 9.00 CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION 89-90 .05 .20 9.00 9.25 9.25 OBJECT CODES 4113 ACCOUNT TITLE Crossing Guards 4201 Contract Serv/Private 4215 Contract Serv/Gov't BUDGET EXPLANATIONS EXPLANATION One temporarily used position deleted as a result of Cal -Trans Study (ref. Pac. Cst. Hwy and 16th) Assessment Engineer; cost reduced due to 2nd year of 2 year contract. County of Los Angeles fee for Tax Collection CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: 4113 - Suggest review of salary range at least every other year to maintain competitiveness and retention. Review for 1990-91 fiscal year. Charge General Services Officer costs here for hours spent in crossing guard relief activities. 96 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET 1989-1990 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - STREET LIGHTING DIVISION OBJECT CODES AUTHORIZED 88-89 DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION 89-90 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Director Superintendent Crewleader Maintenance I Clerk Typist . 10 . 10 .50 2.25 . 10 Total 3.05 . 10 . 10 .50 2.25 . 10 3.05 CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION 89-90 . 10 . 10 . 50 2.25 . 10 3.05 OBJECT CODES ACCOUNT TITLE 4201 Contract Serv/Private 4251 Contract Serv/Gov 4311 Auto Maintenance 5403 Vehicle BUDGET EXPLANATIONS EXPLANATION Assessment Engineering Services. Los Angeles County Assessment Collection fee and Caltrans lighting maint. agreement for PCH traffic signals (50%) This year includes an additional $4,000 for body work and paint for the Highlift Truck #24A (boom truck). $2,000 one-half purchase price for used 1/2 ton pick-up (other 1/2 budgeted to Traffic Safety Division). New vehicle for work not requiring the boom truck. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: budget4/pwsl 4201: Continue to check ways to reduce this annual administration cost. 114 I FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR --105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ----EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT --(BY FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 12,275.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL - -- -12, 275. 00 - r • t .. ri DIVISION --TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. PAGE ----- 0026 DATE 03/14/90 66.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 1, 022. 92 8, 183. 36 0. 00 1, 022. 92 • -- 8, 183. 36 ----------- 0. 00 12, 275. 00- - -- 1, 022. 92 12, 275. 00 2601 STREET LIGHTING DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 4100 PERSONAL•SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF -- 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER -- 4303 UTILITIES 4304 TELEPHONE 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL -- DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 77. 099. 00 1, 000. 00 1. 533. 00 - •- - 1, 533. 00 4. 000. 00 9, 699. 00 --- --__. 8, 932. 00 103. 796. 00 1, 022. 92 8,-183.-36 8. 183. 36 4,091.64 4, 091. 64 66. 6 66. 6 0. 00 -- --- ... 4, 091". 64 - ---- 66. 6 -- 0- 00 6, 018. 24 46, 251. 55 0. 00 11. 30 0. 00 .-.----- ......._.. 0. 00 0. 00 1, 494. 26 0. 00 89. 57 940. 00 7, 047. 81 14. 300. 00 0. 00 ---- 9, 350. 00 ..- •-- --- • 1. 575. 56 23, 650. 00 1. 575. 56 170, 000. 00 150. 00 10, 200. 00 2, 500. 00 9, 500. 00 - 500. 00 8,188.00 201. 038. 00 2, 000. 00 •---- "2. 000. 00 - 330, 484. 00 330, 484. 00 • 15, 068. 06 20. 63 277. 07 135. 66 15.37 0. 00 268. 58- 15. 248. 21 915. 00 -6. 118. 45 6, 602. 02 61, 398. 58 6, 000. 00 --4, 850. 58 10, 850. 58 102, 663. 08 175. 15 5, 766. 63 2, 068. 98 1, 513. 55 50. 00 5, 113. 92 117, 351. 31 0. 00 0. 00 23, 871.58 4,091.64 0. 00 30, 847. 45 0. 00 988. 70 0. 00 -"-.'_ 1, 533. 00 0. 00 38. 74 0. 00 3, 085. 00 0. 00 -- ---- 3, 580. 55 0. 00 2, 323. 98 0. 00 42, 397. 42 0. 00 8. 300. 00 0. 00 -- -'- 4, 499. 42-- 0. 00 12, 799. 42 0. 00 0. 00 ---' 468. 60 0- 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 468. 60 0. 00 189, 600. 47-- '- - 468. 60 23, 871. 58 189, 600. 47 468. 60 67, 336. 92 25. 15- 3, 964. 77 - - 431. 02 7, 986. 45 450. 00 3, 074. 08 83, 218. 09 2, 000. 00 2, 000. 00 -. 140, 414. 93 140, 414. 93 66. 6 59. 9 1. 1 0. 0 97. 4 22. 8 63. 0 73. 9 59. 1 41.9 51.8 - 45. 8 60. 3 116. 7 61. 1 82. 7 15. 9 10. 0 62. 4 58. 6 0. 0 0. 0 57. 5 57. 5 2NNCE-FA4 4 • TIHE 10:42:38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND 8201 CIP 85-201 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) • FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 30,000.00 -- - OBJECT SUBTOTAL .. ---- 30, 000. 00 DIVISION ---• TOTAL------- 30, 000.00 r) 8202 CIP 85-202 DEPT: STREET LIGHTING IP 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 2,000.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 111 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS• 41/OBJECT SUBTOTAL I.LL - 5400 EQUIPMENT 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS OBJECT SUBTOTAL r� 110. • A DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL - --- 2, 000. 00 --- 0.00 - O. 00 • PAGE 0027 DATE 03/14/90 66.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE Z 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -- 0. 00 0. 00 825. 00 O. 00 -- -- 825. 00- 0. 0- 0. 00 ....... ........._ -... 814. 94 0. 00 814. 94 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00. 2, 000. 00 32, 000. 00 374, 759. 00 340. 80 340. 80 _--- 0. 00 30, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 - - -- 30, 000. 00 .. ....... 0. 0 0. 00 - ---- 30, 000: 00 --- 0. 00 1, 175. 00 41. 2 -1, 175. 00 -- 41. 2'- - 0. 00 ... - - -... 814. 94- - -.. _... 0: 0 0. 00 814. 94- 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 980. 74 0. 00 0. 00 1, 980. 74 0. 00 24, 894. 50.. -- - 199, 764. 57 -------- 468. 60 340. 80- 340. 80- 19. 26 30, 019. 26 174, 525. 83 0. 0 0. 0 99. 0 6. 1 53. 4 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 10:42:38 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR --155 CROSSING GUARD FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 02/01/90 TO 02/28/90 APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4, 500. 00 4. 500. 00 DIVISION ---TOTAL- 4. 500 00 - DEPARTMENT TOTAL MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. PAGE ----'- 0044 DATE 03/14/90 66.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.. 375.00 3.000.00 375. 00 -- --- 3. 000. 00 375.00----- 3:000.:00- 4.500.00 375.00 2102 CROSSING GUARD DEPT: POLICE ,., 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 12.145.00 901.03 7.070.88 0.00 5.074. 12 58.2 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 0.00 0.00 15.24 0.00 15.24- 0.0 41.10 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF ------- -- -- 238. 00 --------- - .... 0. 00 _ - - _187. 98 ------ 0. 00 --_....__.......-__._. . 50. 02 - 78. 9 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 238.00 0.00 318.67 0.00 80.67- 133.8 4113 CROSSING GUARDS 33, 321. 00 2, 427. 01 15. 178. 47 0. 00 18, 142. 53 45. 5 4180 RETIREMENT _-` -' 2, 765. 00 0. 10- - . - 832. 06' -• O. 00 1, 932. 94 -_._. 30. 0 4187 UNIFORMS 1, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 876.00 71.64 599.26 0.00 276.74 68.4 OBJECT SUBTOTAL _-- - 50. 583. 00 3, 399. 58 ...... _ _.... 24, 202. 56 ------ - 0. 00 26, 380. 44 - ... 47. 8 0. 00 1, 500. 00 66. 6 0. 00 -'- - . ` ..1. 500. 00 66. 6 0. 00---- - 1.500: 00 - 66. 6 3, 000. 00 0. 00 1, 500. 00 66. 6 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE -'--- 8.400.00 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 300.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 8, 900. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1. 814. 00 -1. 814. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 61.297.00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 61, 297. 00 65. 797. 00 O. 00 •- 2, 000.00------.- --• 0.00 - O. 00 0. 0,0 0. 00 0. 00 2, 000. 00 0. 00 177.60- 1.089.41 0.00 177. 60- ...__' ---_ 1. 089. 41 --- ..-` 0. 00 3,221.98 3.221.98 3.596.98 27, 291.97 27, 291.97 30. 291. 97 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6. 400. 00 • 23. 8 500. 00 0. 0 6, 900. 00 22. 4 724. 59 60. 0 _._.. 724. 59.._-...._ 60. 0 34, 005. 03 34, 005. 03 35, 505. 03 44. 5 44. 5 46. 0 April 2, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council April 10, 1990 KIWANIS CHRISTMAS TREE LOT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission that City Council approve the request by the Kiwanis Club to operate a Christmas tree lot on the front lawn of the Community Center for the holiday season. t is further recommended that this request be approved for future years until such time the Council determines that the fundraiser should not take place at the Community Center.) BACKGROUND The Kiwanis Club has operated this lot for two years on the Community Center lawn (southeast portion). Attached you will find Council approvals for those years in addition to the 1990 request from the Kiwanis Club. The Commission approved this request at their March meeting. ANALYSIS The Kiwanis Club has proven over the past two years to be responsible and cooperative with all City requirements and requests. The lot has proven to have minimal negative impact on the condition of the lawn and on the smooth operaton of the Community Center. Approvals for future years are advised for the sake of expediency. That -is, unless competing requests for the lawn usage arise our unless the Council determines the usage should not be approved for a particular year, a standing agreement would seem appropriate. Noted: evin $. Nort raft City Manager Respectf >>Jy submitted, Mary C iney Direc or Dept of Community Resources lh Kiwanis Club of Hermosa Beach Post Office Box 121 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. • March 21, 1990 City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive • Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 I am writing on behalf of the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club to request the City's authori2ation to conduct the holiday tree sales fund raising event in December, 1990. 'This will be our third year conducting this major fund-raising effort to support our many programs to assist Hermosa residents. We propose to use the same southeast part of the Community.Center as we used in 1989, under the same terms as in the past. Thank you for your past support, and for your consideration of this year's request. Because of the strong community support for this event. we hope it will be.a perennial one that is more and more successful with each :rising year. Sincerely yours, Frank Hallstein, President February 27, 1959 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of March 14, 1989 REQUEST OF THE KIWANIS CLUB FOR CHRISTMAS TREE LOT ON COMMUNITY CENTER LAWN RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission the City Council approve the request of the Kiwanis Club for the operation of a Christmas Tree Lot on the front lawn of the Community Center for the holidays of 1989. BACKGROUND A similar request was granted by the City Council for this past holiday season. Attachment A reflects 1) the Council agenda item of last year, 2) the wrap-up report from the Kiwanis Club for this year's operation, 3) staff's wrap-up report to the City Council for this year's project and 4) the Commission's agenda item regarding this project for this coming year (1989). ANALYSIS The one change in the request for this year is the Kiwanis Club would like to move the location a bit closer to PCH. This does not present any problems from staff's perspective. As staff has indicated to the Commission there may be a problem in the future should any other local non-profit make the same request of the City. That has not happened to date. If it should occur in the future, staff suggests it be addressed at that time. However, in order .to have a successful project, work must start on a project of this magnitude now. Therefore, staff is also recommending the Council approve this project for this year and if another organization does make a similar request, that that be addressed next year. Previously staff has thought the organization of such a project could begin in September of each year. However in discussions with the Kiwanis Club and cne other owner of a Christmas tree lot, the work must begin almost immediately after the Christmas season. Part of the reason is to secure a good price for the trees. A representative of the Kiwanis Club will be at the Council meeting should there be any questions. Respectfully submitted, Concur: 'Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Alana Mastrian-Harl'dman Director Dept. of Community Resources �i • NOTE: As a point of information, the Kiwanis Club has again agreed to donate to the Community Center Foundation 10%% of its net profits or $1,000 whichever is greater. This revenue to the Foundation is comparable to the Seaview Property rental for the same activity with adjustments made for 1) over-all square footage and 2) a non-profit versus commercial entity. October 5, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council KIWANIS CHRISTMAS TREE SALE REQUEST City Council Meeting October 11, 1988 RECOMMENDATION The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission recommends City Council approves the request from the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club to conduct a Christmas Tree sale on the south lawn of the Community Center. BACKGROUND The Kiwanis Club brought forth a request for this sale to the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission at their Sept. 28th meeting. 88 Kiwanis projects to occupy the salesite willfrom beNovember fundraiser9for the through January 1, 1989. Th Kiwanis Club and will also benefit Community Center Foundation's Air Conditioning Fund. (The Kiwanis Club has agreed to donate $1,000 or 1O4 of their net profits, whichever is higher, to the Foundation's Air Conditioning Fund.) ANALYSIS The Commission agreed that the project should be approved on a one year trial basis subject to the following conditions: • The location of the tees shall be the southern most triangle of the front lawn of the Community Center (abutting llth Place); • The area can be fenced in and lighted; • Temporary signs can be installed on the front lawn directly in front of the trees and between the marquee and the designated site; • Kiwanis will assume all costs for restoring the area back to its original state, with the Public Works Department approving all work; this may include other areas as the sprinkler system will have to be turned off in that particular area but it will affect other areas as well; said work to be completed by January 15, 1989; ▪ Kiwanis will be allowed to have a camper on llth Place for 24 hour security purposes. Any lost revenue from the meters will be borne by the Kiwanis Club; • Kiwanis will pay to the Cicy any other costs incurred by the City with regard to this project; Kiwanis may occupy the site from November L1, 1J2itf through January 1, 1989; • .!f4RIwanis will _provide'. nsdrand-6 • The approval will be for one year only with.a review immediately following. Concur: /Kevin B. Northcraf t City Manager 2 Resile �,`•mitted, Mary Dept �.�_ ! Director . of .mmunity 'Resources April 2, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council April 10, 1990 City Council Meeting of OYER -THE -LINE TOURNAMENT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation Resources Advisory Commission that Council from Southern California Over -The -Line for Beach Softball Over -The -Line Tournament in 28-29, 1990. and Community approve the request a Club Cocktail Pro Hermosa Beach on July BACKGROUND Russ Johnson, President of Southern Calfornia Over -The -Line, filed an application with the Department of Community Resources to hold a professional Over -The -Line tournament in Hermosa Beach in the Summer of 1990. Over -The -Line is a modified softball game using three players on each team. However, in an Over -The -Line game the "field" is rectangular shape (250' X 55') and set in soft sand (see attached diagram). In early January, Russ Johnson met with staff and discussed. the logistics involved in holding a professional Over -The -Line tournament in Hermosa Beach. The request was presented to the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission on February 28. The Commission approved the event upon the condition they review the final contract agreement. To date, an Over -The -Line tournament has not been held in Hermosa Beach nor had a request been filed to hold such an event. ANALYSIS Staff has determined the Southern California Over -The -Line Tournaments directed by Russ Johnson have run successfully without negative incident in several neighboring cities (see attached recommendations). The Over -The -Line pro tour will also be scheduled at other locations including: Huntington Beach, Long Beach and Pismo Beach. If approved in Hermosa Beach, the tournament (10 to 12 playing fields) will be located adjacent to the Municipal Pier utilizing approximately 50% more beach area than past commercial events (please refer to diagram). In Hermosa Beach the Club Cocktail Over -The -Line Pro Tournament will consist of approximately 34 teams. This pro tour will differ from previous Southern California Over -The -Line Tournaments due to the pro status (sponsor Club Cocktail - prize money $3,000 per tournament). It is estimated that 1000 to 2000 ..../ — . 1t spectators will attend. Day two will include an amateur tournament, where up to 24 teams from the community are eligible to participate (at fee of $15.00 per person). The Club Cocktail Over -The -Line Tournament event contract will be drafted per our Commercial Beach Event Rules and Regulations (see attached). Per our Special Event Ordinance, they will be charged $1,500 per day ($3,000)for permit fees in addition to other City costs as incurred. As the majority of beach events scheduled to date are volleyball tournaments (see attached) a new type of activity may serve as a refreshing addition to our summer calendar. Attachments: Special event permit application Tournament Diagram North of Municipal Pier #1 Tournament Diagram North of Municipal Pier #2 Tournament Diagram South of Municipal Pier Letter's of Recommendation City of Hermosa Beach Commercial Beach Event(s) Rules and Regulations City of Hermosa Beach Schedule of Commercial Beach events Summer 1990 Concur - Respectfully submitted, C__c(ua ac14-ei0 Mary C,7 ooney Dir ctor Deet. of Community Re ources ie: Kevin B. Northcr,a'ft City Manager Carol Belsey, Recreation Specialist Dept. of Community Resources CITY MANAGER COMMENT: The amount of beach area being used is some concern. This inaugural event will allow us to ascertain the degree of conflict, if any, between regular beach goers and event participants. City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION Organization's Name: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OVER -THE -LINE ASSOCIATION Profit ** Non -Profit Non-profit Number Organization's Address: 10473 MAPLEDALE ST. BELLFLOWER, CA Phone Number(s) : ( 213) 866 - 8685 Zip Code 90706 Contact Person and Title: Contact Person's Address: BELLFLOWER . CA 4' RUSS JOHNSON (PRESIDENT) 10473 MAPLEDALE ST. Zip Code 90706 Daytime Phone Number: Evening 866-8685 (213) Phone Number: 866-8685 BriefDescription•of Event: "CLUB COCKTAIL" PRO BEACH SOFTBALL TOUR CHAMPIONSHIP (64) THREE -ON -THREE PLAYER TEAMS COMPETING IN DOUBLE ELIMINATION TOURNAMENT. PRIZE MONEY INVOLVED ( $ 3,500.00 ) TOTAL PURSE. BEACH S01'TBALL BETTER KNOWN AS "OVER -THE -LINE". Date(s) of Event: 1) SATURDAY / SUNDAY, AUGUST 4/5, 1990 ) SATURDAY / SUNDAY, JULY 2829, 1990 Location (s) of Event: HERMOSA BEACH PIER AREA (NORTH) *AWAY FROM THE PIER* FROM RESTROOM AREA NORTH - STREETS 14 - Set-up Time: SATURDAY: 5:00 A.M. - 8: 0r A.M. TOURNAMENT STARTS: 9:00 A.M. SUNDAY: 7:00 A.M. - 8:00 A.M. TOURNAMENT STARTS: 9:00 A.M. Time. Event le to CpMPICNCC 9:00 A.M. (BOTH DAYS) 4. MINIMUM - 100 * AVERAGE - 140 Number of Participants (Including volunteers): MAXIMUM - 200 Anticipated Numb of, S ctators: SITTING -UNDER 500 r • Number of Vehicles Involved and How Used: 2 - VANS 1 -PICK UP TRUCK NO VEHICLES WILL EVER DRIVE ON THE SAND. VEHICLES USED FOR LOADING AND UNLOADING. Description of Set-up for this Event: DIAGRAMS # - 1 and # - 2 Alibi ON SEPARATE SHEETS. ALL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED WILL BE PORTABLE;.LARGE INFLATABLE BALLOON, PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, SMALL SCOREBOARD 1G Fr. by 15 FT. WIDE, PORTABLE CANOPIES, TABLES, BANNER POLES, AND GENERATOR. Additional Information or Special Requests: TRASH CANS TO BE. PLACED BEHIND AND OR BETWEEN EACH PLAYING FIELD, Ai$0, PLACED 7 ALONG EACH SIDE OF THE BIKE TRAIL. X THIS IS THE FIRST YEAR FOR THE PRO TOUR. THIS IS OUR PROGRAMS FOURTEENTH YEAR CONDUCTING TOURNAMENTS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. Fees, Charges and Other Requirements: Police Costs $ Fire Costs $ Business License $ Public Works Costs $ Processing Fee Other Costs $ Total Due.. $ Refundable Damage Deposit $ Damage Deposit is due: Balance of fees incurred are due:* Insurance Required: Yes)(/ _ No Date Received Unless greater or lessor coverage is requested, applicant agrees. to furnish the City of Hermosa beach evidence of $1 million comprehensive general liability insurance in the form of a certificate, covering the entire period of this permit, naming the City of Hermosa Beach and its employees as additional insureds. Expiration Date Permittee waives claims against the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees, for fees or damages caused by, arising out of, or in any way connected with the exercise of this permit. APPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND TO MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION AND TO RETURN SAID PREMISES IN THE SAME CONDITION AS THEY WERE BEFORE SAID USE. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ALL FEES, CHARGES AND OTHER NECESSARY MATERIAL WILL BE PAID AND/OR FURNISHED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES AS MUTUALLY AGREED TO BY BOTH PARTIES. Company Rep estative Date Permit to be processed through City Council: Yeses No If YES, Council!'s decision: Application is invalid without the following signatures: Department of Community Resouces Police Department Authorization Fire Department Authorization if Required Life Guard Authorization Needed on all Water Events Date Date Date Date 4. February 1, 1990 Over—The—Line SLO-TWO-PITCH SOFTBALL Mary Ruiny City Of Hermosa Beach Recreation Special Permits Director 710 Pier Ave. Hermosa Beach, Ca 902+ Dear Mary, I appreciated both you and Carol for taking time out for our brief meet- ing in January. We discussed the many opportunities that lie ahead for beach softball "over -the -line" and its involvement as a contractual activity for your recreational department. The main discussion was for our program to present to you and the special events commission on February 27, 1990, a well planned special event permit and proposal. The following items are included as a part of the beach permit proposal: * Completed permit form. Video Tape of beach softball "over -the -line". • References from past history. • How the community will benefit. Tentative Plan - Sponsor - Information On Tour. • Safe Diagram - Outline Of Beach Area. We are very interested in making to come. This is our thirteenth area. This is our sixth year as BEST REGARDS, Russ Johnson President this an annual partnership for years year serving the Southern California an associate member of S.C.M.A.F.. 10+73 MAPLEDALE ST. PFT,T.WI,CwER, CA 90706 (213) 866 - - OTL HOW THE COMMUNITY WILL BENEFIT Since its birth 35 years ago on the shores of South Mission Beach in San Diego, beach softball "over -the -line" has blossomed from a relatively obscure. hometown game into a very popular, highly competitive regional sport that appeals to men, women, and children of all ages. By mixing the Southern California "attitude" with a derivation of America's pastime, the lure of beach softball has spread beyond the borders of San Diego to the parks and beaches of Los Angeles County,. Orange County, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Inland Empire Valley, Ventura, Central Coast, Las Vegas, Phoenix, Reno, Lake Tahoe, Canada and Mexico. Just as America's surging fascination with the California beach lifestyle has propelled surfing and volleyball into the lucrative market -place ,beach soft- ball "over -the -line" too is taking its place alongside its more publicized sister sports as an attractivemarketing outlet. The local community of Hermosa Beach will benefit greatly from this sporting event in the following ways: * One of a kind special sporting event on your beach. * This enables your city to become a valuable part of our PRO TOUR. • Our type of sport is geared to the entire family atmosphere, which will be reflected by the type of crowds. • Area residents and softball enthusiasts are given the opportunity of not only watching the event, but also to participate as well. • Local merchants and hired help benefit from lodging, travel needs, dining, gift shops, parking, and entertainment. • The Department of community Services will be able to visibly see and explore how effectively this type of program can be used as a guideline for their program. THE CLUB "C: NS i &) CN TEE BEACH" 190 BEACH SOFTBALL SERTT Born on the beaches of Souther: California, Fro Beach Softball has emerged as a popular and dynamic athletic challenge. In its early days only a handful of Southern Californians dabbled in the sport, but beach softball has wn into world class competition from coast to coast. The -ort, which pits three - man teams battling in a soft sand, five inning, beach softball game, has createi a natural and enduring affiliation with the relaxed teach lifestyle. From San Diego to Seattle and from Long Beach to Miami Beach, Florida. The main reason or beach softball's growing popularity is that there is no special physical requirements, anybody can play. In various tournaments around Southern California, one can witness participants -men and women, from fourteen yearn old to fifty yearn of age playing on the sand. There tournaments offer "divisions" for the skilled and unskilled players and teams. The bottom line to beach softball is fun. With well over a million softball players in Southern California and millions more flecking to the beaches each weekend, the growth of beach softball is ine-itable. Currently in Southern .California alone, there are over seventy - tournaments annually. Each tournament averages over 75 teams, while there are currently over 3C00 known teams. Starting in May, the Pro Beach Softball Series plans to get underway in the Southern California and Central California beach areas, including Orange. County Huntingtar. State Beach, Los Angeles County - Long Beach and Hermosa Beach, San Luis Obispo Court, - Pismo State Beach. Althougc the FBSS'S mainstay will be the Southern and Central California beach areas, other tournaments can be found in areas such as San Diego, Santa Cruz, Bakersfield, Oceanside, all in California. Cther popular areas are Phoenix and Scottsdale, Arizona, and Las Vegas, Nevada. T:.e series will be feature on some holiday weekends and others on summer weekends where the location lends to high spectator.visiblity. The series will finish off Labcr Day weekend with the championships, to be held in Long Beach, Ca.. Each of the five events will have $ 3,000 to $ 4.,000 in prize money culminating with the chrrnpionships which will award $ 5,000 - $ 6,000.. This gives the champions of PBS:.; a chance at winning a total of $ 17,000 to $ 22,000 in prize money. Each tournament will showcase over 200 of the best men professional players in the world. Each tournament will feature a maximum field of sixty four teams to PAGE 2 battle for each title. With the proper promotions along with the weekends t =_t have high srectator visibility, it is estimated that 2;000 to 5,000 spec to .ors will be in touch with the event on the beach. Not to mention the highway ani bike trail traffic visibility for the entire weekend. We intend to incb±e as much television, cable, and radio coverage as possible. Each event site will display the main sponsors name, logo, and any other visual displays. Also, on display will be secondary sponsors and local organizations who will assist in the set-up and take-down of each event. This will create more ex;osure, thus greater srectatcrshir. Another feature to the PBSS will be its concessions. We anticipate that the `.various sponsors will have their own set-ups for displays only. FESS will also have their own booths or canopy set-up. PBSS'S concession stands will have on sale the following items that will include your logo; T-SHI_:TS, CAPS, GOLF SHIRTS and a host of other goods as well. All in all the TILE CLUB "CLNSO ED ON THE BEACH" - P3C HACH SOFTBALL SERIES will become the grand slam on the Southland and central beaches of Calii'ornia. By bringing "The Great American Pastime" together with "America' s Favorite Summer Spot, The Beach", gives a tremendous opportunity for corporate, regional and local sponsors to reach a captive audience. PAGE The United States Pro Beach Softball Series announces the beginning of the 1990 HE CLUB "CENSORED ON THE BEACH" Pi) TOUR, a .zest coast beach softball series comprised of the top player's in the s=ort of beach softball. Some events will offer a amateur division. The tour will showcase events at five locations. With future plans of ex-panding throughout the continental United States. The two day weekend PRO event will feature double elimination format on Saturday and Sunday. To enhance a large spectator following, an amateur division will be played on Sunday. The United States Pro Beach Softball Series promises to containall the ingredients for fun in the sun, exciting action, as well as a glimpse of the many facets of the sport. TENTATIVE SCHEDULE LOCATIONS DATES EVENTS • HOSTS 1.. Huntington Beach, CA 2. Long Beach, CA 3. Hermosa Beach, CA 4. Pismo Beach, CA 5. Long Beach, CA USPBS MAY 26 - 27 PRO / AMATEUR ZUBIES SPIRITS TRAVELCDGE MEMORIAL WEEKEND USFBS JUNE 30 - JULY 1 PRO / AMATEUR YANKEE DCQDLES FOURTH OF JULY WEEKENDEDGEWATER HOTEL AUGUST 4 — 5 PRO (ONLY) USPS;; --INTERNATIONAL SURF FESTIVAL AUGUST 11 - 12 PRO / AMATEUR USPBS SEA VENTURE HOTEL SEPTEMBER 1 - 2 PRO / AMATEUR USPBS LEGENDS EDGEWATER HOTEL Organizing Authority is the United States Beach Softball Association. RULES THE CLUB "CENSORED ON THE BEACH" PRO BEACH SOFTBALL SETS shall be governed by United States Beach Softball Association rules adopted. ENTRY 1. Limited number of entries accepted. PRO DIVISION - Based solely on skill level of players. AMATEUR DIVISION - FIRST COME, FIRST SERVE. PAGE 4 n Fin tr nts must comply with registration for?. PiO 'ESSIONAL STATU::: Players must register and will remain a P in future events. 4.. AMATEUR STATUS: CAN NOT participate in 5. b S: ( PE:I EVENT ) A) P _ESSICNAL: $ 75.00 ( FEti TEAM ) B) AV.ATEUR: $ 45.O0 ( EU TEAM ) 6. DIVISION SIZES: A) PROFESSIONAL: 64 TEAMS B) AMATEUR: 24 TEAMS (SUNDAY ONLY) ROUND sriBIN PLAY 7. Divisions are subject to change at each event. Divisions are also subject to cancellation at each event. iG series. NO P:iIZE MONEY. MONEY Atva:y;S T. z:FIi ai;Ari2S IcLoc,ry (gE)'-r Rooms { �1!//.119,vo�I///1 / con/€XFI// //// 1 -c 77.5-ro,E' 4/2E4 AkE 'TAW/ 4. //'mfr. MS'S fT Norte F -ice poex- XA F ET)' ) *>G X'X X`?cowEC XX. V V V QgaPION ON Toy° (AEJT \f/ TA-r°R ClicE quARD <b. /S# • /6 s. rftr, .rT. a- Ociqfi jELD DiM ✓l/oA/1 t 9E1' AER 1 5`;;11 C�O O ., -- ft,2Fi9 foITIgg 1 fN I,(T Two T/4 L f CAN,,), aALvoo t Nam Mlim• _ i Clark Country January 31, 1990 To Whom It May Concern: Department of Parks and Recreation GLENN TROWBRIDGE DIRECTOR 309 SOUTH THIRD b 1 HEET LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89155 (702] 455-4384 The Southern California Over -The -Line Association has been coordinating tournaments with the Clark County -Department of Parks and Recreation, 'Sunset Park Over -The -Line and Softball facilities for the past eight (8) years. Mr. Johnson -coordinates two tournaments per -year - The Las Vegas Desert Classic Over -The -kine in October and the Las Vegas Desert Classic Two Pitch Softball Tournament in April. We always accomodate.- Mr. -Johnson's tournaments. __.Mr. Johnson's Associations' --__ _-_-.- ----- players are always courteous and respect the rules of our park. ---I ---- - would highly recommend Mr. Johnson's Southern California Over -The -Line Association for any such tournament in your area. If more information is needed, please feel free to contact me at (702)455-8200. Sincerely, ll�cx.�.L55 Michael Krauss Recreation Program Supervisor - Sunset Park 2575 East Sunset Road Las Vegas, NV 89120 (702) 455-8200 COMMISSIONERS Bruce L. Woodbury, Chairman • Paul J. Christensen. Vice -Chairman Jay Bingham, Manuel J. Cortez. Thalia M. Dondero, Karen Hayes, William U. Pearson Donald L "Pet" Shalmy, County Manager Wav-e Picrw Jaccceiine Rynerson Council Member Lam' Van Yoswan . Mayor To Whom It May Concern: Rcber G. `;l aver Council : (e.-..;ir Russ Johnson has organized quality events throughout this area for many years. He has used our facilities with care and respect. Russ Johnson and Southern California Over -The -Line have my sincerest recommendation. -Sincerly, om Lederer Community Services Manager. 5050 N. Clark Avenue, Lakewood. CA °0712 • (21&66-q771 • (2'.31773.1904 • Fax (2131 866-0505 U i1 ll F HOE E CIVIC CENTER • BLOOMFIELD AVENUE at 183rd STREET • P. O. BO•X3130 CEPRITOS, CALIFORNIA 90703 • (2131 860-0311 • FAX (2131865-1044 - (2131 865-7277 January 26, 1990 To Whom It May Concern: This letter of reference is in regard to Mr. Russell Johnson and his Southern California Over -The -Line Program. Mr. Johnson has been conducting Over -The -Line tournaments for many years and has always been accountable in conducting quality tournaments. I am aware that he has a large following and is always creating_ new ideas in which to brighten up his programs. I have utilized him on numerous occasions and have rented -'facilities to him and have been completely satisfied with the programs he has conducted. As you can see, I recommend utilizing Russ' services. If you have any further -questions, -please _ call me at (213)860-0311, extension 264. er Sincerely, Joe Mendoza Leisure Services Supervisor DIANA NEEDHAM ANN JOYNT PAUL W. BOWLEN BARRY A. RABDITT DANIEL K. WONG. M D MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER /7 COUNCILMEMDER DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES FAX (714) 532-0437 RECREATION (714) 5320383 PARKS (714) 532-0339 February 8, 1990 STREET TREES (714) 532-0325 To Whom It May Concern: Russ Johnson (Southern California Over -The -Line) has been conducting softball tournaments on City of Orange facilities for the past 10 years. During this time we have found him to be very professional, well organized, easy to deal with and overall his services have added to our recreation program. I would recommend Mr. Johnson services to your agency. RK:gg Rich Kollen Recreation Manager. 326 E. ALMOND STREET • ORANGE. CALIFORNIA 92666-1591 ---- CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT(S) RULES AND REGULATIONS FEES Permit fee shall be Negotiated by both parties with minumu m amount set at $1,500 per day. A non-refundable application processing fee of $500 will be required for all pro tournament requests. The deposit will be applied toward the $3,000 permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the City. All predetermined costs fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the Tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the City. SECURITY The City of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the Tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one representative of the sponsor and/or its event promotion firm. Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide no less than ten security officers. Said officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other Tournament staff. A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa. Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the Tournament for a pre -event briefing. The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of the City's alcohol ordinance. The City of Hermosa Beach shall provide Police Officers for the event as follows for each day of tournament, 10:00 AM - 6:00 PM: 1 Sergeant 4 Officers or as many officers as deemed necessary by Public Safety Director. Cost of officers shall be assumed by the event promotion firm/sponsor. CLEAN-UP .Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide a professional maintenance service to clean the following. areas each day of the Tournament: . The Beach and Strand, from 8th Street to 15th Street. . Pier Avenue, from Strand to Monterey Avenue. The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the trash collected outside the City each day of the Tournament. All maintenance work is to be concluded by 8:00 PM each evening. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES Event promotion firm/sponsor shall assume all costs for two (2) additional lifeguards each day of tournament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. INSURANCE Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide the CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $1 million. combined single limit coverage. Event promotion firm/sponsor agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of the event promotion firm/sponsor its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors; with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. ADVERTISING Signage regarding the CITY'S alcohol ordinance shall be required of the event promotion firm/sponsor. City staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for posting. City of Hermosa Beach shall permit two street banners to be posted for tournament. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of the event promotion firm/sponsor. CITY shall permit event promotion firm/sponsor to display two large replicas of their product. City staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. In the event of an alcohol sponsor, event promotion firm/sponsor shall be required to make two (2) announcements per hour informing spectators of the CITY'S alcoholic beverage ordinance. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimilies, etc. deemed necessary by event promotion firm/sponsor to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of event promotion firm/sponsor. PARKING Event promotion firm/sponsor shall be required to post signs throughout the impacted area as well as at major ingress roads to the CITY indicating 1) where there is free parking and 2) that the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. SPECIAL EVENTS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events requested to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. If the event promotion firm/sponsor desires any County services, they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by the event promotion firm/sponsor. The CITY Police Department shall act as liaison with various downtown merchants in an effort to mitigate any disruption during the Tournament. The CITY shall allow access to Tournament site for set-up thirty-six (36) hours prior to Tournament. The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue, Beach Drive to the Strand for Tournament staff parking. No food or beverage concessions shalt be permitted. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID POLICY. MISCELLANIOUS EVENT PROMOTION FIRM/SPONSOR RESPONSIBILITIES Event promotion firm/sponsor shall provide as many portable port -a -johns as determined necessary by City staff. Event promotion firm/sponsor shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. Event promotion firm/sponsor shall be responsible for all prize money, volleyball equipment, sound system and personnel necessary for conducting such a tournament. Event shall be conducted in compliance with City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances on file at the Dept. of Community Resources. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH SCHEDULE OF COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENTS SUMMER 1990 May 26 Men's A CBVA (California Beach Volleyball Assoc.) June 2,3 Women's Diet Pesi Pro Volleyball June 7,8 Women's AA CBVA Jure 9 Men's Master CBVA June 16,17 Women's Pro Volleyball Sponsor TBD Aug. 4 Helicopter Landing (International Surf Festival) Aug. 4 Power Lounging (International Surf Festival) Aug. 4 Fishing Derby (International Surf Festival) Aug. 25 Miller Lite Men's Pro Tournament Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council April 10, 1990 City Council Meeting of April 24, 1990 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PREPARE A RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Request for Proposal for a consultant to prepare a Records Management System. Background: At a City Council goal setting workshop the City Council established as one of its goals, to develop a Records Management system. The City Council appropriated $20,000 and directed staff to proceed with the project. Analysis: Records are essential to the successful management of any organization. Records are valuable tools used to assist an organization attain it's goals and objectives. Successful records management is a valuable asset. Poor records management can restrict an organization, reduce it's effectiveness and increase cost. Why this City needs a Records management Program: 1. There is no City-wide data on records management issues, but difficulties are widely experienced. Crowded office space, lack of storage for inactive records, slowed re- search, duplicate filing, etc, 2. Access to and retrieval from inactive areas difficult, time consuming and unsafe due to distance from active office areas, incomplete indexing and the physical problems encountered in handling stacks of storage boxes. 3. Storage boxes exposed to flood and fire hazard, evidence of mice in some records areas (no damage found). 4. Data collected would suggest immediate measures that could be implemented to save time and space. 5. Data would be useful in estimating active and inactive records storage space and equipment requirements. 6. Consistency in records maintenance, regardless of storage media. Legal liability is decreased if records are maintained lawfully and properly. 7. Allow for efficient management (creation, storage, retrieval and destruction) of the records created. 8. Vital records protection including identification of vital records, method of protection and preservation and to in- clude disaster recovery planning. [Vital records include original minutes, ordinances, resolutions, deeds, capital and property records, accounts receivable, personnel and payroll records, maps and engineering drawings, etc.] 9. Blueprints badly deteriorated in paper and line quality, no indexing, no systematic location (in some departments), many are folded and too brittle for much use (need for micro- filming). CONCUR: Elaine Doerfli g, City Clerk evin B. North City Manager Respectfully submitted, Henry L. Staten, Acting Director of General Services Computer System Manager Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director.. CITY MANAGER COMMENT: This is a one-time cost to profession- alize our permanent records management system; it never should need re -doing. Records are an organization's memory. I recommend one change; Section. -TV of Request for Proposal appears to be asking for a recommendation for more. staff. Consultant should be asked to develop system that existing staff can maintain.- - 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH NOTICE INVITING BIDS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids will be received at the office of the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive, Room 201, until 11:00 a.m. on Thursday, May 17, 1990, for Record Management System in accordance with requirements and minimum specifications. The bids will be publicly opened and read aloud in the Council Chamber, City Hall, at 11:00 a.m. on Thursday, May 17, 1990. Each bid fee must be submitted on the form furnished by the City. Proposal Forms, requirements and minimum specifications may be obtained at the City Clerk Office, Room 201 of City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA. 90254-3884; call (213) 318-0204. The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive any irregularities in a bid, and to award the sale. The bid will be awarded to the consultant who best provides a product meeting the City's needs. Dated: April 25, 1990 Elaine Doerfling City Clerk CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PREPARE A RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BACKGROUND The City of Hermosa Beach, incorporated in 1907 and located in the County of Los Angeles, is a general law city of approximately 1.2 square miles with a current population of approximately 19,764 residents. The City staff size is approximately 212, this includes full and part-time employees. An informal inventory has been conducted of all records at City Hall since incorporation in 1907. It has been determined that retention schedules are either limited, non-existent, or unknown for the majority of the records on file; thus very little has been eliminated. Records are maintained in a variety of filing systems throughout City Hall, with each department maintaining their own files and establishing their own filing systems. Many departments are utilizing the alphabetical filing system with no index filing guide. OBJECTIVE Establishment of a Records Management System to service as many facets of City operations as feasible. To insure that the City develops the best possible records management system, as well as developing a sound plan for implementation, requires the services of a qualified consultant. The consultant may provide training of staff, the services outlined and assist the City Clerk in preparing specifications for a records management system, and making recommendation to staff and the City Council. SCOPE OF SERVICES The immediate concern of the City is determination of the records management and micrographic requirements of the City. The selected consultant shall perform a comprehensive analysis of all records and documents of each department and from this shall make recommendation on the development and implementation of a uniform records management program for the City. The scope of the work shall include, but not be limited to, those tasks listed. The consultant may propose additional tasks to be undertaken during the study and such recommendation will be evaluated by the City and may be included in the ultimate services contract. I. ACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM 1. Records Inventory A complete physical inventory of all files (active and in- active). The inventory shall identify categories of files and assist in the development of the functional topics for the filing system; it shall identify files which may be destroyed immedi- ately and those which must be kept for specified periods of time; and it shall serve as a master filing index. 2. Records Retention Schedule Retention schedules, reflecting legal requirements, shall be prepared for all records. A draft of the retention schedules shall be submitted for review and approval by appropriate staff and the City Attorney. The final retention schedules shall reflect both State and Federal legal requirements and retention information based on staff input as to the historic, research, and administrative value of records. 3. Purging of Files Using the approved retention schedules, inactive records which must be kept for a longer period of time shall be removed from the active files and prepared for transfer to an alternate storage area; permanent records that should be protected from potential loss shall be identified; and obsolete records shall be segregated and prepared for destruction. A list of records proposed for destruction shall be submitted for approval by Department staff, the City Clerk and the City Attorney. A resolution authorizing their destruction, along with the necessary exhibits, shall then be prepared for submittal to the City Council. 4. Creation of Master Functional Filing System Using the inventory results, a practical, functional filing system shall be created to be used on a city-wide basis. Func- tions performed by the various departments shall be identified and records categorized and subcategorized within each function. Color codes shall be developed to prevent misfiling and to indi- cate retention information. Draft functions and categories shall be submitted for review, comment, suggestions and/or modifications, to City Clerk and/or designated staff member. 5. File Preparation and System Implementation Once the filing system has been approved, the actual filing system implementation shall begin, and all remaining active files shall be incorporated into the new system. Materials to accom- plish the project shall be specified. It shall be the option of - 2 - the City to purchase the supplies from the consultant or from an. outside source. 6. Comprehensive File Cross-reference Index A comprehensive cross-reference index shall be prepared to direct all users to the appropriate location of information within the filing system. 7. Filing Procedures Manual The filing procedures manual shall contain, at minimum: a. legal authorities setting forth requirements relating to the management of public records; b. a complete description of the filing system; c. an identification and explanation of the functional categories and subcategories of the system; d. the color coding andnumerical sequence of the func- tional filing categories; e. pertinent exhibits, as necessary, to make the system practical and useful to both current and future staff; f. guidelines for a periodic review to remove inactive records; and the manuals shall become the property of the City and shall be provided in a form that can be updated. II. RECORDS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION A. Computerized Records Management System Information It is proposed that a software program for the HP 3000 mainframe be designed or an alternate method of storage that will retain the record management information. It also will include the following features: access to information, rapid retrieval of information, ability to print out specific information, and create reports. III. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY INDEXING A. Computerized City Council Minutes/Resolution/Ordinance The City Clerk's office presently has a legislative history software application in-house called INDEX/3000. Index/3000 provides a tool for recording summaries of important documents and locating them quickly. It is specifically designed to support the City Clerk functions. Improves access to information and reduces effort to obtain it - 3 - Significantly improves speed and accuracy o record searching Extended city wide, it provides the core of a centralized record index that can reduce the time and space devoted to filing and retrieving documents In the future other departments will have read access and certain departments will be able to use the system for various commission and committee minutes. IV. STAFFING REQUIREMENTS The consultant shall evaluate the staffing requirements needed and determine if the current city staff is sufficient or if additional staff is recommended to develop, implement, and maintain a city-wide records management program. Time spent on data entry should also be considered for the two applications, that will be involved. If additional staff is recommended, the consultant shall prepare job descriptions and tasks to be completed by additional staff. V. INACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM This program to be accomplished after Task I is complete (Active Records Program). 1. Reorganization of Inactive Records The inactive records removed from the active filing system shall be reorganized by a record series where possible in standardized storage cartons or files. A color coding system relating to destruction shall be established. 2. Inactive Records Locator Log A Records Locator Log, listing all inactive records (by location, record series, and future destruction date), shall be prepared. This log shall aid in retrieving inactive records, as well as in location assignments for records to be transferred to inactive storage in the future. It shall be formatted for easy entry onto the City's computer system. 3. Inactive Records Procedures To provide for the ongoing maintenance for the inactive records program, the following procedures shall be provided for: a) transferring records from the storage; receiving and storing records storage area; 4 active system to in the inactive c) determining micrographic needs ofprogram; 1 d) security of stored records;' e) future destruction of inactive records; f) reusing storage cartons and'locations; and g) maintaining locator logs. FEES Maximum fee to be charged for records management services (Exhibit A) to be itemized for each task as specified: I. ACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM Fee shall include records inventory, records retention schedule, purging of files, creation of master functional filing system, file preparations and system implementation, comprehen- sive file cross-reference index and filing procedures manual. II. RECORDS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Fee shall include creation of software program for access to Records Management information and the related estimated cost for required data entry. IV. STAFFING REQUIREMENTS The consultant shall evaluate the staffing requirements needed and determine if the current city staff is sufficient or if additional staff is recommended to develop, implement, required data entry and maintain a city-wide records management program. If additional staff is recommended, the consultant shall prepare job descriptions and tasks to be completed by .additional staff. V. INACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM Fee shall include reorganization of inactive records, creation of an inactive records locator log with separate fees for the input to be done by the Consultant or City staff. VI. SUPPLIES AND EXPENSES The Consultant shall specify a list of all required sup- plies and expenses such as folders, labels, boxes, computer disks, etc. on a not -to -exceed basis. PROJECT PLAN Upon acceptance of •proposal Consultant shall prepare a work project plan including benchmarks. ; SYSTEM AUDIT Consultant shall perform an audit of the system approximately six months after its installation to ensure that it is running smoothly and efficiently. GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS General terms and conditions shall be provided to the selected Consultant prior to signing the contract. PRE -PROPOSAL CONFERENCE A pre -proposal conference will be held to answer any questions that the prospective firms may have regarding the City's Request for Proposal (RFP). The City Clerk and/or Computer System Manager shall conduct a site visit if requested. It is requested that the prospective firms contact the City if they will attend the pre -proposal conference in order that appro- priate arrangements can be made. All consultants must contact the City prior to, or at the pre -proposal conference to be on the mailing list for additional information regarding the City's RFP. CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THE RFP All questions or requests for information submitted in writing will receive a written response from the City. All prospective consultants who attend the pre -proposal conference will receive copies of all such correspondence. Telephone communications with City staff are not encouraged, but will be permitted in the interest of a timely response. However, it is an explicit provi- sion of the RFP that any oral communication is not binding on the City's proposal process or award of contract. PROPOSAL CONTENT The firm's proposal must contain the following information: 1. Experience and history of the firm in developing and implementing records management programs for local governments, as well as any other related experience. This section should also include a listing of references that'rticr be contacted regarding the firm's experience, type of projects completed, and name, address and tele- phone number. 2. Copies of records management programs prepared for other local governmental agencies. 3. Identification of staff capabilities along with resumes of key personnel who will be assignedtto the project. In- dicate any government experience. 4. A brief description of your firm's approach and plans for each task. Include any other services recommended other than those specifically requested. 5. Proposed time frames required to complete the various phases of the records management program, including estimated starting date. 6. Statement indicating the type of information and time required by Consultant from City staff in the working relationship resulting therefrom. 7. Fee schedule. PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION Proposals must be submitted to the City Clerk before 11:00 a.m. May 17, 1990. ADDRESSED: City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive, Room 201 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Two copies of the proposal should be submitted evaluated by the City Clerk and designated person. Selection criteria will be the City evaluation of firm's which will be the consulting - Understanding of work scope, - Demonstrated professional skills and credentials of the staff to be assigned to the records management program - Quality of the proposal - Approach to performing the records management program - Proposed maximum fee - References and similar projects performed for other governmental agencies The award of the contract will not necessarily be based on the lowest maximum fee proposed, but on a combination of all of the above factors. Additionally, the City reserves the right to select portions of the firm's proposal based on the fee quoted for each major task due_to budgetary constraints. The City also reserves the right to reject all proposals. The City welcomes proposals for specific areas to be addressed in the Records Management System. EXHIBIT ”Auk FEE SCHEDULE SUMMARY I. ACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM 1. Records Inventory 2. Records Retention Schedule 3. Purging of Files 4. Creation of Master File System 5. File Preparation & System Implementation 6. Comprehensive File Cross -Reference Index 7. Filing Procedures Manual *PERFORMED BY **DIRECTED BY CONSULTANT CONSULTANT II. RECORDS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION (Include recommendations for computer application and data entry) IV. STAFFING (Includes recommendations for future staffing needs) V. INACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM 1. Reorganization of In- active Records 2. Inactive Records Locator Log 3. Inactive Records Procedures VI. SUPPLIES & EXPENSES (see Page 5) * PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT - If consultant and his/her staff were to complete task **DIRECTED BY CONSULTANT - Consultant directs existing City staff on task outlined (may include recommendation for additional staff) BACKGROUND MATERIAL a k CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: Kathy Midstokke, City Clerk DATE: February 1, 1989 SUBJECT: Current Record Storage FROM: Joan Noon, G. S. Director Per our conversation, I have surveyed all of the departments record storage. The following is a result of the survey; Public Works: Has records stored at the Community Center - with the Fire Department - no list - boxes marked- Marilyn Planning: Has records stored at the Community Center- no list - boxes marked - Michael regarding shares space Finance: Has records stored at the Community Center - no list - boxes marked. Has more recent payroll records stored in rat room - Viki/Linda Building: Has records stored at old Prospect School i.e. building permits, etc. May have records i.e. receipts, etc. at Community Center - no list. Plans stored in rat room however, in process of micro -filming all plans - over a period of time will complete then originals will be destroyed - Bill Personnel: Records stored at Community Center - has listing of all person- nel files - other records, boxes marked. Some records stored in Executive Conference Room closet - Bob City Manager, City Council, City Attorney: May be some old City Attorney records stored at Community Center - Laurie Community Center: Records stored in dungeon (Community Center) - no list - boxes marked - Alana Police Department: Some records stored in bike locker in garage on Bard Street - no list - boxes marked - Gail General- Services: Records stored at Base #3 in the equipment room - i.e. old payroll records, log sheets, stray animal forms, etc. - no lists Leroy Fire Department: Has records stored at Community Center - no list that they know of - boxes marked - Capt. Chesson City Clerk: (Fill in the blanks) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO 1 TO: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager DATE: January 31, 1989 SUBJECT: Records Management FROM: Joan Noon, G. S. Director Progress Report * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *)* * * * * * * * * *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*_*_*_*_*.*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_ As you aware, one of the City Council goals (tied for number four) is; "City to develop and advise City Council regarding status of records man- agement efficiency and needs". City Clerk Midstokke and I have been working on this project and have come to the conclusion that Records Management/Retention and Indexing, while related, should be evaluated independently. I have attached, for your re- view, a copy of the material the City Clerk has prepared with the exception of the actual samples of Records Management Manuals and Retention Schedules. The latter are voluminous however; they are in the her office should you wish to review them. You will note, from her survey, that none of the South Bay Cities appear to have a record management system but most have indexing/legislative history. I have been evaluating the Infocomp Legislative History Program that was purchased, along with the rest of the Infocomp programs. I have reviewed the documentation and find it to be both cumbersome and superfluous. I contacted some of the Infocomp cities that installed the program and learned that they either do not utilize the program or have since replaced it with another system. Those contacted were; Montclair, Visalia, San Ra- mon and East Bay. Most cities contacted, including those that are not In- focomp cities, utilize either Knowles -McNiff Index 3000 or Munimetrix Clerks Index. We are making arrangements to visit the City of Covina for a demonstration of the Munimetrix software and the City of Montclair for a demonstration of the Knowles -McNiff software. The funds to install an indexing program have been approved in the 1988/89 budget. Once we have determined which is the most efficient, cost effective andconduciveto our needs, we proceed with the purchase. We will continue with our evaluation of Records Management/Retention and will prepare a recommendation to the City Council within the next couple of months. J n Noon cc: Kathy Midstokke, City Clerk CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM ; TO: General Serv. Dir. Noon DATE: Jan. 30, 1989 FROM: City Clerk Midstokke RE: Records Management Per your request, I have prepared a report on Records Management. The sections include: Introduction to Records Management, Why the City Needs a Records Management Program, Survey of Local Cities' Record Programs, Initiating the Records Management Program, State Laws regarding Municipal Records, California Public Records Act, and a sample Records Retention Schedule for a City Clerk's Department. I am requesting an appropriation at Mid -Year Budget for software for the indexing of minutes, ordinances, deeds, contracts, etc. The survey we made showed many cities very pleased with the program which I am recommending. And as you know, we did review the Infocomp software we already have, and concluded that it required too much storage space and many users have not been satisfied with it. I have attached a sample of a,records management manual and retention schedule prepared by the City of Modesto and retention schedules for Berkeley and Livermore. Also,.a sample of the City of Torrance database management program. which a consultant from UCLA designed personally for their needs is included. I look forward to working with you in preparing a recommendation to the City Council on this subject. /) Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk cc: City Manager INTRODUCTION TO RECORDS MANAGEMENT Records serve as administrative and legal tools and are created in the course of and as a by-product of the public officer's performance of duty. Records are not created for historical purposes, but create history by their existence. Local governing bodies, harassed by the daily problems -and - demands of'special interests and the complexities of - decision -making, seldom are able to spare the time, funding, or thought for evaluation of their record-keeping program. A result is the ever-increasing quantity of records and their attendant problems including an increased demand for space and personnel. The rapid change in the physical form of records has complicated the management of records over the years. Records 'are no longer limited to paper, but include other types of storage media such as floppy disk, magnetic tape, electronic memory, film, and optical disc. In California, the City Clerk is designated as "the keeper of the record" (Government Code Section 40808). This creates a challenge for each City Clerk to develop a comprehensive city Records Management Program. Whether the records are maintained centrally or decentrally in departments, the program should be overviewed by the City Clerk. This will assure consistency in records maintenance, regardless of the storage media. The development and implementation of an effective Records Program should be designed to reduce the quantity or records, provide for the creation of fewer and better records, and allow for efficient management of the records created. WHY THE CITY NEEDS A RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. 1) Ever increasing quantity of records and their attendant problems including an increased demand for space and personnel. 2) Consistency in records maintenance, regardless of storage media. Legal liability is decreased if records are maintained lawfully and properly. 3) Provide for the creation of fewer and better records. 4) Allow for efficient management (creation, storage, retrival, and destruction) of the records created. 5) Vital records protection including identification of vital records, method of protection and preservation, and disaster recovery planning. (Vital records include original minutes, ordinances, resolutions, deeds, capital and property records, accounts receivable, personnel and payroll records, maps and engineering drawings, etc.) • ►..rr1 . J. 3 . anummougussulannanit © HI. • TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: City oPermosarl3each. CITY CLERKS OFFICE MEMORANDUM. JOAN NOON, GENERAL SERVICES KATHY MIDSTOKKE, CITY CLERK RECORDS MANAGEMENT SURVEY JANUARY 24, 1989 CITY CONTACT & NUMBER COMMENTS EL SEGUNDO aON HART, 631 REDONDO BEACH ALICE MULLER, 673 MANHATTAN BCH TORRANCE GARDENA HAVE LEGISLATIVE HISTORY; COMM.SVC. & CITY CLERK HAVE EPSON EQUITY III COMPUTER-COMPATABLE W/HP SYSTEM. HAS LEGISLATIVE HISTORY; CENTRAL FILING SETUP BY ALICE, RECORDS ADM. TALKED W/OTHER CITIES, LOOKED OVER THEIR SYSTEMS, ETC. STARTED WORKING ON SYSTEM IN 1983; JUST GETTING THE SYSTEM WORKING PROPERLY. LAVONNA HOCK, 661X403 MICROFISCHE & WORKING ON SYS. NO CONSULTANT OR PLANS TO USE ONE. DEBBIE THOMPSON 618-2870 MAY DOI, 217-9500 ROLLING HILLS TRISH, 377-1577 RANCHO PALOS LOMITA HAWTHORNE JO PURCELL,377-0360 DAWN TOMITA,325-7110 JOAN FITZSIMMONS 970-7921 HAVE BOX FILING; EVEREX COMPUTER IBM COMPATABLE - D BASE 3. COMPUTER, RAND SYSTEM; CITY CLERK & RECORDS SUPVSR HAVE EVEREX PC. SYSTEM NOT CENTRALIZED VITAL INFO ON MICROFISCHE. GETTING HP MAIN- FRAME. MUNIMETRICS SOFTWARE FOR INDEXING. MICROFISCHE ONLY, NO CENTRALIZED RECORDS MANAGEMENT. MUNIMETRICS; NO CENTRALIZED RECORDS MANAGEMENT NO CENTRALIZED RECORDS MANAGEMENT. LIGISLATIVE HISTORY ONLY INITIATING THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM A) Inventory and appraise records B) Establish records retention schedulesfor all departments (possibly excluding Police Department'since they already have a records administrator/manager) C) Destroy obsolete, unneeded records D) Transfer less active records to low cost storage (out of office) E) Index records in offices and storage F) Remove surplus equipment (file cabinets, etc.) G) Prepare a records management manual H) Analyze records management problems, develop solutions I) Establish an audit system once the program is implemented May 10, 1989. Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council May 23, 1989 REPORT REGARDING STATUS OF RECORDS MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY AND NEEDS Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council approve in concept the hiring of a consultant to initiate a Records Management Program and authorize staff to prepare an RFP for said services subject to approval of the expenditure in the 1989/90 budget. Background: At the City Council's goal setting workshop, the City Council established the following goal (tied for number four); "City to develop and advise City Council regarding status of records management efficiency and needs". Introduction to Records Management: Records serve as administrative and legal tools and are created in the course of and as a by-product of the public officer's performance of duty. Records are not created for historical purposes, but create history by their existence. Local governing bodies, harassed by the daily problems and demands of special interests and the complexities of decision-making, seldom are able to spare the time, funding, or thought for evaluation of their record-keeping program.,..A result is the ever increasing quantity of records and their attendant problems including an increased demand for space and personnel. The rapid change in the physical form of records has complicated the management of records over the years. Records are no longer limited to paper, but include other types of storage media such as floppy disc, magnetic tape, electronic memory, film and optical disc. In California, the City Clerk is designated as having custody of official city records (Government Code Section 40808). This creates a challenge for -each City Clerk to be involved in the development of a comprehensive city Records Management Program. Whether the records are maintained centrally, or decentrally in departments, the program should be overviewed by the City Clerk. This will assure consistency in records maintenance, regardless of the storage media. - 1 - lg The development and implementation of ayi effective Records Program should be designed to reduce the quantity of records, provide for the creation of fewer and better records, and allow for efficient management of the records created. Why the City needs a Records -Management Program:. 1. Ever increasing quantity of records and their attendant problems including an increased demand for -space and personnel. 2. Consistency in records maintenance, regardless of storage media. Legal liablility is decreased if records are maintained lawfully and properly. 3. Provide for the creation of fewer and better records. 4. Allow for efficient management (creation, storage, ret- rieval, and destruction) of the records created. 5. Vital records protection including identification of vital records, method of protection and preservation, and disaster recovery planning. [Vital records include original minutes, ordinances, resolutions, deeds, capital and property records, accounts receivable, personnel and payroll records, maps and engineering drawings, etc.] Current status of record keeping: Our investigation and inquiry of various departments show that records are stored in the following places; Community Center Public Works Department Records Finance Department Records Building Department Records Community Center Records Planning Department. Records Personnel Dept. Records City Attorney Records Fire Department Records Rat Room -Basement Storage Finance Department - More recent payroll records Building Department - Plans stored however, in process of micro- filming all plans. Over a period of time will complete then originals will be destroyed. City Clerk Records Base #3 - 1035 Valley Drive General Services Records Old Prospect School Building Department Records - i.e. building permits, etc. May have receipts, etc. at Community Center.. Storage Space In Basement Under Stairs City Clerk Records Executive Conference Room Closet City Clerk Records Personnel Department Records Bike locker in garage on Bard Street Police Department Records - Some All departments indicate there is no documentation/lists of what records are stored where, but the boxes are marked. In addition thousands of records are filed in the hundreds of file cabinets throughout the City offices. Initiating the Records Management Program: A. Inventory and appraise records B. Establish records retention schedules for all departments C. Destroy obsolete, unneeded records D. Transfer less active records to low cost storage (out of office) E. Index records in offices and storage F. Remove surplus equipment (file cabinets, etc.) G. Prepare a records management manual H. Analyze records management problems, develop solutions I. Establish an audit system once the program is implemented Analysis: Staff recommends that a Consultant, expert in this field, be hired to initiate the Records Management Program. This is a monumental task and recognizing the limited staff in the City Clerk's office, it would appear to be the most cost-efficient method of performing the work. The City Clerk has requested an appropriation of $20,000, in the 1989/90 budget, to hire a - 3 - consulting firm to perform this task. This is a one-time expenditure. Once a system is in place\ and retention schedules are established, it is assumed that the City Clerk's office as well as all other departments will be capable of maintaining'an efficient system. The City Manager has suggested the importance of records. management coordination with another department, or full time appointed personnel, to insure continuity and efficient management. Initially, it was suggested that this effort be coordinated with the General Services Department however, since the fate of General Services is under study (because of the impending early retirement of the Director) this may not be a viable alternative. This concern could be addressed by the consulting firm as part of their overall recommendation. Ultimately, the decision would lie with the City Manager and City Council. Are1.461k1K? athleen Midstokke J Noon City Clerk G. S. Director Concur: evin B. Northc aft City Manager CITY MANAGER COMMENT: General Services is the coordinator of all non -legislative City records by virtue of our centralized data processing. While many departments have legal responsibilities for records, the City Clerk and General Services (or its successor) are appropriate coordinators of our City-wide efforts. CALIFORNIA LAWS GOVERNING MUNICIPAL RECORDS The legislative laws of the State of California are codified into 28 Codes known as the California Codes. Several of these Codes contain references to the duties of the City Clerk and to the types, format, and retention of records. Each Code has an index which will guide the researcher to the appropriate section of the Code. Code sections are subject to revision. The Codes are updated annually with pocket supplements which are generally found in the back of each volume. The original text, as well as the supplement, should be reviewed annually to verify that the law has not changed. (Editors Note: Only those sections and subsections of the Codes which specifically reference cities are listed. The underline is the Editor's. An asterisk (*) following a section number and title denotes a summary rather than a direct quotation from the Code.) The laws governing municipal records are delineated as follows: ELECTIONS CODE EC 4092. Charter petition destruction. Allows destruction of Freeholders' Charter petition in accordance with Sec. 3756 (Replaced by Sec. 14700). EC 10012.7. Confidentiality of candidate's statement.* Declares confidentiality of candidate's statements until expiration of filing deadline. EC 12524. Code of Fair Campaign Practices as public record.* Declares Code of Fair Campaign Practices as public record open for public inspection. EC 14306. Destruction of ballots by clerk. (a) Immediately upon the arrival of the hour when the polls are required by law to be closed on election day, the clerk conducting the election, shall openly, in the clerk's main office, in the presence of any persons who are present to observe, according to the procedure set forth in either Section 14303 or 14304, proceed to deface every unused ballot remaining in the control of the clerk. The clerk shall forthwith make and file an affidavit, in writing, as to the number of ballots destroyed. (b) In lieu of the procedure set forth in subdivision (a) for defacing unused ballots, the clerk may recycle the unused ballots according to the provisions of Section 17136. (Editor's Note: EC 14600, 14810, 14820, 14830 & 14970 pertain to other than municipal elections.) EC 14600. Retention and destruction of nominating papers. (a) All nomination documents and signatures in lieu of filing fee petitions filed in accordance with this code shall be held by the officer with whom they are filed during the term of office for which they are filed and for four years after the expiration of the term. 14-35 (Revised, 1987) (b) Thereafter, the documents and petitions shall be destroyed as soon as practicable unless they either are in evidence in some action or proceeding then pending or unless the elections official has received a written request from the Attorney General, the Secretary of State, the Fair Political Practices Commission, a district attorney, a grand jury, or the governing body of a county, city and county, or district, including a school district, that the documents and petitions be preserved for use in a pending or ongoing investigation into election irregularities, the subject of which relates to the placement of a candidate's name on the ballot, or in a pending or ongoing investigation into a violation of the Political Reform Act of 1974 as set forth in Title 9 (commencing with Section 81000) of the Government Code. EC 14700. Destruction of petitions. (a) Elections officials required by law to receive or file in their offices any initiative or referendum petition shall preserve the petition until eight months after the certification of the results of the election for which the petition qualified or, if the measure, for any reason, is not submitted to the voters, eight months after the final examination of the petition by the elections official. (b) Thereafter, the documents and petitions shall be destroyed as soon as practicable unless they either are in evidence in some action or proceeding then pending or unless the elections official has received a written request from the Attorney General, the Secretary of State, the Fair Political Practices Commission, a district attorney, a grand jury, or the governing body of a county, city andcounty, or district, including a school district, that the documents and petitions be preserved for use in a pending or ongoing investigation into election irregularities, the subject of which relates to the placement of a candidate's name on the ballot, or in a pending or ongoing investigation into a violation of the Political Reform Act of 1974 as set forth in Title 9 (commencing with Section 81000) of the Government Code. (c) Public access to any such petition shall be restricted in accordance with the provisions of Section 6253.5 of the Government Code. (d) This section shall apply to the following petitions: (1) Statewide initiative and referendum petitions. (2) County initiative and referendum petitions. (3) Municipal initiative and referendum petitions. (4) Municipal city charter amendment petitions. (5) District initiative and referendum petitions. EC 14800. Retention of rosters of voters. (a) The elections official shall preserve all rosters of voters or combined rosters and- indexes as provided for in Section 14006, if applicable, until five years after the date of the election, after which they may be destroyed by that official. (b) In lieu of preserving the original roster of voters, the elections official may, by filming or other suitable method, record the original roster of voters and destroy the roster following the next subsequent general election. EC 14811. Retention of ballots. (a) The following provisions shall apply to all state or local elections not provided for in subdivision (a) of Section 14810. An election is not deemed a state or local election if votes for candidates for federal office may be cast on the same ballot as votes for candidates for state or local office. 14-36 (Revised, 1987) (b) The packages containing the following ballots and identification envelopes shall be kept by the elections official, unopened and unaltered, for six months subsequent to the date of the declaration of the result of the election: (1) Voted polling place ballots. (2) Voted absent voter ballots. (3) Absent voter identification envelopes. (4) Spoiled ballots. (5) Cancelled ballots. (6) Unused absent voter ballots surrendered by the voter pursuant to Section 1012. (7) Unused polling place ballots. (c) If a contest is not commenced within the six month period, or if_ a criminal prosecution involving fraudulent use, marking or falsification of ballots or forgery of absent voters' signatures is not commenced within the six-month period, either of which may involve the vote of the precinct from which voted ballots were received, the elections official may have the ballots destroyed or recycled. EC 14821. Retention of tally sheets and street index. (a) The following provisions shall apply to all state or local elections not provided for in subdivision (a) of Section 14820. An election is not deemed a state or local election if votes for candidates for federal office may be cast on the same ballot as votes for candidates for state or local office. (b) The elections official shall preserve the package or packages containing the following items for a period of six months: (1) Two tally sheets. (2) The copy of the index used as the voting record. (3) The challenge lists. (4) The assisted voters list. (5) The affidavits of the persons assisting voters. (c) If a contest is not commenced within the six month period, or if a criminal prosecution involving fraudulent use, marking or falsification of ballots or forgery of absent voters' signatures is not commenced within the six-month period, either of which may involve the vote of the precinct from which voted ballots were received, the elections official may have the ballots destroyed or recycled. EC 14831. Retention of ballots after election contest. (a) The following provisions shall apply to all state or local elections not provided for in subdivision (a) of Section 14830. An election is not deemed a: state or local election if votes for candidates for federal office may be cast on the same ballot as votes for candidates for state or local office. (b) Upon the completion of the counting of the votes as provided in Article 4 (commencing with Section 17180) of Chapter 13 of Division 12, all ballot cards shall be arranged by precincts and shall be kept by the elections official for 22 months or so long thereafter as any contest involving the vote at the election remains undetermined. (c) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this code, the final disposition of all voted ballot cards shall be determined by the electkons official. (d) Sealed ballot containers may be opened if the elections official determines it is necessary in a shredding or recycling process. 14-37 (Revised, 1987) EC 14900. Retention of recall petitions. (a) The clerk or, in the case of the recall of a state officer, the ecretary of State, shall preserve in his or her office all recall petitions filed for eight months after the results of the election for which the petition qualified or, if no election is held, eight months after the clerk's final examination of the petition. (b) Thereafter, the petition shall be destroyed as soon as practicable unless it is in evidence in some action or proceeding then pending or unless the elections official has received a written request from the Attorney General, the Secretary of State, the Fair Political Practices Commission, a district attorney, a grand jury, or the governing body of a county, city and county, city, or .district, including a school district, that the documents and petitions be preserved for use -in a ,pending or ongoing investigation into election irregularities, or in a pending or ongoing investigation .into a violation of the Political Reform Act of 1974 as set forth in Title 9 (commencing with Section 81000) of the Government Code. (c) Public access to any such petition shall be restricted in accordance with Section 6253.5 of the Government Code. EC 14971. Retention of precinct officials appointment records. (a) The following provisions shall apply to all state or local elections not provided for in subdivision (a) of Section 14970. An election is not deemed a state or local election if votes for candidates for federal office may be cast on the same ballot as votes for candidates for state or local office. (b) The elections official shall preserve the following records reflecting the appointment of precinct officials until six months from the date of an election. (1) Precinct officers' declaration of intention required by Section 1637. (2) Precinct board member applications specified in Section 1637.5. (3) Order appointing members of the several precinct boards and designating the polling places specified in Section 1638. (4) Nominations for appointment to the precinct board by the county central committee of each qualified political party specified in Section 1639. (5) Written orders appointing precinct board members or designating the polling place for the precinct pursuant to Section 1648. EC 17130. Application of chapter.* Requires clerk to dispose of the records and supplies of any election in the manner set forth in the chapter. - EC 17134. Voted ballots to be retained; contest or prosecution. - If a contest or any such criminal prosecution has been commenced prior to the date fixed for its destruction, the package containing the voted ballots shall be subject to the order of the court in which the contest or criminal prosecution is pending and shall not be destroyed until after final determination of the contest or criminal prosecution.. In no event shall the package or its contents be taken from the custody of the clerk. EC 17136. Recycling of unused ballots. Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, the clerk, after holding the unused ballots for the purposes of Division 10 (commencing with Section 14000), immediately upon the arrival of the hour when the polls are required by law to be closed on election day, in lieu of the procedure outlined in Section 14306, may recycle for any other lawful purpose any unused ballots remaining in the control of the clerk which clearly identify the election for which they were prepared. The clerk shall make and file an affidavit, in writing, as to the number of ballots recycled. 14-38 (Revised, 1987) EVIDENCE CODE EV 1531. Certification of copy for evidence. t For the purpose of evidence, whenever a copy of a writing is attested or certified, the attestation or certificate must state in substance that the copy is a correct copy of the original, or a specific part thereof, as the case may be. EV 1550. Photographic copies made as business records. A photostatic, microfilm, micro card, miniature photographic, or other photographic copy or reproduction, or an enlargement thereof of a writing is admissible as the writing itself if such copy or reproduction was made and preserved as part of the records of a business. The introduction of such copy, reproduction, or enlargement does not preclude admission of the original writing if it is still in existence. EV 1551. Photographic copies where original destroyed or lost. • A print, whether enlarged or not, from a photographic film (including a photographic plate, microphotographic film, photostatic negative, or similar reproduction) of an original writing destroyed or lost after such film was taken or a reproduction from an electronic recording of video images on magnetic surfaces is admissible as the original writing itself if, at the time of the taking of such film, or electronic recording, the person under whose direction and control it was taken attaches thereto, or to the sealed container in which it was placed and has been kept, or incorporated in the film, or electronic recording a certificate complying with the provisions of Section 1531 and stating the date on which, and the fact that, it was taken under his direction and control. (Editor's Note: To comply with the three sections above, the following information is required in the certificate for microfilm: 1. The date of photographing. 2. The signature of the individual under whose direction and control the photographs were taken. 3. The fact that photograph is a correct copy of the original or a specific part thereof, as the case may be. When planetary cameras are used, the certificate can be placed on the flat bed adjacent to the document, thus photographing both at the same time, changing the date as necessary. When using rotary cameras, the certificate can be shot at the beginning and end of the reels. No seal is required, nor need the person 'under whose direction and control' the photographs are taken be a sworn officer of the city, but only the responsible individual.) GOVERNMENT CODE GC 1453. Recording.* Requires official bonds to be recorded in a book entitled, "Record of Official Bonds." GC 4003. Engineer to keep account of cost.* Requires the engineer in charge of a public work to keep an account of costs. GC 4004. Plans, specifications, and cost estimate.* Requires the engineer in charge of a public work to file a record of specifications or work authorization and estimated costs prior to commencement of public work. 14-39 (Revised, 1987) GC 5004. Record of registered bonds.* Requires the treasurer of a municipality to keep a record book of registered public bonds. GC 6200. Theft, destruction, falsification, or removal by officer custodian Every officer having the custody of any map, record, or book, or any paper of proceedings of any court, filed or deposited in any public office, or placed in his hands for any purpose, who is guilty of stealing, willfully destroying, mutilating, defacing, altering, or falsifying, removing or secreting the whole or any part of such record, map, book, paper, or proceeding, or who permits any other, person to do so, is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years. - GC 6201. Theft, destruction, falsification, or removal of person other than officer custodian Every person not an officer referred to in Section 6200 who is guilty of any of the acts specified in that section, is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison, or in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding $100, or by both such fine and imprisonment. GC 6252. Definitions As used in this chapter (Editor's Note: Chapter 3.5 Inspection of Public Records): (b) "Local Agency" includes city, whether general law or chartered, municipal corporation; school district; or any board or commission or agency thereof; or other local public agency. (c) "Person" includes any natural person, corporation, partnership, firm, or association. (d) "Public Records" include any writing containing information relative to the conduct of the public's business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics. (e) "Writing" means handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing any other means of recording upon any form of communications or representation, including letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or a combination thereof, and all papers, maps, magnetic or paper tapes, photographic films and prints, magnetic or punched cards, discs, drums and other documents. (f) "Member of the public" means any person except a member, agent, officer, or employee of a federal, state; or local agency acting within the scope of his or her membership, agency, office or employment. GC 6253. Public records open to inspection; times; guidelines and regulations • governing procedure (a) Public records are open to inspection at all times during the office hours of the state or local agency and every person has the right to inspect any public record except as hereafter provided. Every agency may adopt regulations stating the procedures to be followed when making its records available in accordance with this section. GC 6253.1. Adoption of requirements for greater access Except as otherwise prohibited by law, a local agency may adopt requirements for itself which allow greater access than prescribed by the minimum standards set forth in this chapter. 14-40 (Revised, 1987) GC 6253.5. Inspection of election petitions.* Initiative, referendum, and recall petitions are not public records and are not open to inspection except by clerk and, if the petition is found to be insufficient, byl the proponents of the petition and their representatives. Such examination shall begin not later than 21 days after certification of insufficiency.. Designated public officials can examine petitions with superior court approval. GC 6253.6. Bilingual ballot or ballot pamphlet requests not deemed public records.* The identity of persons who have requested bilingual ballots or ballot pamphlets is not public record. GC 6254. Exemption of particular records ' Except as provided in 6254.7, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to 'require disclosure of records that are any of the following: (a) Preliminary drafts, notes, interagency or intra -agency which are not retained by the public agency in the ordinary course of business, providing that the public interest in withholding said records clearly outweighs the public interests in disclosure. (b) Records pertaining to pending litigation to which the public agency is a party, or to claims made pursuant to Div. 3.6 (commencing with Section 810) of Title 1 of the Government Code, until such litigation or claim has been finally adjudicated or otherwise settled. (c) Personnel, medical, or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. (f) (g) Records of complaints to or investigations conducted by, records of intelligence information or security procedures of, the office of the Attorney General and the Department of Justice, and any state or local police agency, or any such investigatory or security files complied by any other state or local agency for correctional, law enforcement or licensing purposes, except that local police agencies shall disclose the names and addresses of persons involved in, or witness others than confidential informants to, the incident, the description of any property involved, the date, time, and location of incident, all diagrams, statements of parties involved in the incident, the statements of all witnesses, other than confidential informants, to the persons involved in an incident, or an authorized representative thereof, an insurance carrier against which a claim has been or might be made, and any person suffering bodily injury or property damage as the result of the incident caused by arson, burglary, fire, explosion, robbery, vandalism, or a crime of violence as defined by subdivision (b) of Section 13960, unless the disclosure would endanger the safety of a witness or other person involved in the investigation, or unless disclosure would endanger the successful completion of the investigation or a related investigation. Test questions, scoring keys, and other examination data used to administer. a licensing examination, examination for employment, or academic examination, except as provided for in Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 99150) of part of the Education Code. 14-41 (Revised, 1987) { (h) The contents of real estate appraisals, engineering or feasibility estilmates made for or by the local agency relative to the acquisition of property, or to prospective public supply and construction contracts, until such time as all the property has been acquired or all the contract agreements obtained, provided, however, the law of eminent domain shall not be affected by this provision. (i) (1) Information required from any taxpayer in connection with the collection of local taxes which is received in confidence and the disclosure of the information to other persons would result in unfair competitive disadvantage to the person supplying such information. Library circulation records kept for the purpose of identifying the borrower,'of items available in libraries, and library and museum materials made or acquired and presented solely for reference or exhibition purposes. The exemption in this subdivision shall not apply to records of fines imposed on such borrowers. * * * Nothing in this section is to be construed as preventing any agency from opening its records concerning the administration of the agency to public inspection, unless disclosure .is otherwise prohibited by law. GC 6254.7. Air pollution data; housing code violations.* Air pollution data required by a local agency, and all records of notices and orders directed to the owner of any building of violations of housing or building codes, ordinances, statutes, or regulations which constitute violations of standards provided in Section 1941.1 of the Civil Code, and records of subsequent action with respect to such notices and orders, are public records. GC 6254.25. Memorandum from legal counsel regarding pending litigation.* Memorandum submitted to the legislative body of local agency by its legal counsel is protected from disclosure until pending litigation has been adjudicated or otherwise settled. GC 6255. Justification for withholding records The agency shall justify withholding any record by demonstrating that the record in question is exempt under express provisions of this chapter or that on the facts of the particular case the public interest served by not making the record public clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosure of the record. GC 6256. Copies of records: determination on compliance with request; notice; reasons Any person may receive a copy of any identifiable public record or copy thereof. Upon request, an exact copy shall be provided unless impractical to do so. Computer data shall be provided in a form determined by the agency. Each agency, upon any request for a copy of records shall determine within ten days after the receipt of each request whether to comply with the request and shall immediately notify the person making the request of such determination and the reasons therefor. 14-42 (Revised, 1987) 3 � GC 6256.1. Unusual circumstances justifying extension of time limit.*' In unusual circumstances, as specified in this section, the time limit prescribed in Section 6256 may be extended by written notice by the head of the agency to the person making the request setting forth the reasons for the extension and the date on which a determination is expected to be dispatched. No such notice shall specify a date that would result in an extension for more than 10 working days. As used in this section "unusual circumstances" means, but only to the extent reasonably necessary to the proper processing of the particular request: (a) The need to search for and collect the requested records from field facilities or other establishments that are separate from the office processing the request. (b) The need to search for, collect, and appropriately examine a voluminous amount of separate and distinct records which are demanded in a single request. (c) The need for consultation, which shall be conducted with all practicable speed, with another agency having a substantial interest in the determination of the request or among two or more components of the agency having substantial subject:matter interest therein. GC 6256.2 Delay in access; prohibitions; notification of denial; name of persons responsible Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to permit an agency to delay access for purposes of inspecting public records. Any notification of denial of any request for records shall set forth the names and titles or positions of each person responsible for the denial. GC 6257. Request for copy; prompt availability; fee; reasonably segregable portion after deletion of exempt portions Except with respect to public records exempt by express provisions of law from disclosure, each local agency, upon any request for a copy of records, which reasonably describes an identifiable record, or information produced therefrom, shall make the records promptly available to any person, on payment of fees covering direct costs of duplication, or a statutory fee, if applicable. Any reasonable segregable portion of a record shall be provided to any person requesting such record after deletion of the portions which are exempt by law. GC 27332: Recording of documents.* Requires the county recorder to record all documents required or permitted to be recorded by law. GC 34090. Destruction of city records; excepted records; construction. Unless otherwise provided by law, with the approval of the legislative body by resolution and the written consent of the city attorney the head of a city department may destroy any city record, document, instrument, book or paper, under his charge, without making a copy thereof, after the same is no longer required. This section does not authorize the destruction of: (1) Records affecting the title to real property or liens thereon (2) Court records (3) Records required to be kept by statute 14-43 (Revised, 1987) (4) Records less than two years old (5) The minutes, ordinances, or resolutions of the legislative body or of a city board or commission. This section shall not be construed as limiting or qualifying in any manner the authority provided in 34090.5 for the destruction of records, documents, instruments, books and papers in accordance with the procedure therein prescribed. GC 34090.5 Destruction of records: conditions. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 34090, the city officer having custody of public records, documents, instruments, books, and papers, may, without the approval of the legislative body or the written consent of the city attorney, cause to be destroyed any or all of such records, documents, instruments, books, and papers if all of the following conditions are complied with: (a) The record, paper, or document is photographed, microphotographed or reproduced on film of a type approved for permanent photographic records by the National Bureau of Standards. (b) The device used to reproduce such record, paper, or document on film is one which accurately and legibly reproduces the original thereof in all details. (c) The photographs, microphotographs or other reproductions on film are made as accessible for public reference as the book records were. (d) A true copy of archival quantity of such film reproductions shall be kept in a safe and separate place for security purposes. Provided, however, that no page of any record, paper or document shall be destroyed if any such page cannot be reproduced on film with full legibility. Every such unreproducible page shall be permanently preserved in a manner that will afford easy reference. (Editors Note: 34090.5 requires that a security copy of all film of records listed under 34090.(1-5) be maintained at another location if paper copies are being destroyed. All security copies should be shipped to a storage center selected by the city. If the paper documents are destroyed after microfilming, the film, including security copies, must be retained for the same retention period as was, established for the paper copies of the same record.) GC 34090.6 Destruction of recorded radio and telephone communications. Nothwithstanding the provisions of Section 34090, the head of a department of a city, county, or city and county, public safety communications center, or the head of a special district after 100 days may destroy recordings of telephone and radio communications maintained by the department or the special district. Such destruction shall be approved by the legislative body and the written consent of the agency attorney shall be obtained. In the event that such recordings are evidence in any claim filed or any pending litigation, such recordings shall be preserved until pending litigation is resolved. For purposes of this section, "recordings of telephone and radio communications" means the routine daily taping and recording of telephone communications to and from a city, county, city and county, or special district, department, and all radio communications relating to the operations of such departments or special districts. 14-44 (Revised, 1987) GC 34090.7. Duplicate records less than two years old, destruction Notwithstanding the provisions of 34090, the legislative body of a city may prescribe a procedure under which duplicates of city records less than two years did may be destroyed if they are no longer needed. For purposes of this section, video recording mediums, such as videotapes and films, shall be considered duplicate records if the city keeps another record, such as written minutes or an audio tape recording of the event which is recorded in the video medium. However, a video recording medium shall not be destroyed or erased pursuant to this section for a period of at least 90 days after occurrence of the event recorded thereon. • (Editors Note: Under Section 34090.7, the City Council should pass a one-time resolution giving destruction approval authority to department heads for duplicate records.) GC 40801. Record of proceeding; books; index The city clerk shall keep an accurate record of the proceeding of the legislative body and the board of equalization in books bearing appropriate titles and devoted exclusively to such purposes, respectively. The books shall have a comprehensive general index. (Editors Note: An Attorney General Opinion (vol. 64, pg. 317, 4/17/81) opined that where the city clerk makes an authorized tape recording of a city council meeting to facilitate the preparation of the minutes: (a) any person has a right to listen to the tape on equipment provided by the city, (b) any person has a right to receive a copy of the tape which includes the right to buy a duplicate copy from the city or to make a duplicate copy on his own equipment but does not include the right to have a written transcript made, and (c) the tape recording maybe destroyed at any time if the purpose for which it was made and retained was solely to facilitate the preparation of the minutes of the meeting but if the tape was made or retained to also preserve its informational content for public reference it may only be destroyed as expressly authorized by state law.) GC 40802. City clerk as accounting officer.* Designates city clerk as accounting officer and requires clerk to keep records reflecting financial conditions of the city. GC 40802.5. Transfer of duties to director of finance. The financial and accounting duties imposed upon the city clerk by Sections 40802 through 40805 may be transferred to a director of finance when such office has been established and the powers and duties thereof defined by ordinance. GC 43688 Record & accounts.* Requires a city to keep separate records and accounts of municipal bond revenues. (See Gov. Sec. 34090.5) GC 43778. Record of bonds canceled.* Requires a city clerk to keep a minute record of cancelled municipal bonds. Issued under Investment Bond Act 1909 only. (See Gov. Sec. 34090.5) 14-45 (Revised, 1987) GC 43783. Canceled bond entered in minutes.* Requires the legislative body of a city to make a minute record of cancelled municipal bonds. Issued under Investment Bond Act 1909 only. (See Gov. Sec. 34090.5) GC 50015. Destruction of documents filed with or submitted to legislative body. Unless another provision of law requires a longer retention period, the clerk of the legislative body may destroy or otherwise dispose of any paper or document filed with or submitted to the legislative body more than one year previously, unless the legislative body determines that there is a, need for its retention. In determining whether there is a need for retaining a paper or document, consideration shall be given to such factors as future public need, the effect of statutes of limitation, and historical significance. GC 50110. Publications; copies for state library and university; preservation : The legislative body, and each office, officer, or employee of a local agency, shall furnish the clerk with three copies of each printed, mimeographed, or processed book, pamphlet, `report, bulletin, or other publication issued by them at the expense of the local agency. The clerk shall send one copy of each publication to the State Library at Sacramento, the Institute of Governmental Studies of the University of California at Berkeley, and the Public Affairs Service of the University of California at Los Angeles, to be preserved for reference use in those institutions. (Editors Note: Following are addresses for transmitting the publications. University Research Library Government Publications Section Public Affairs Service/Local California State Library University of California P. O. Box 2037 405 Hilgard Avenue Sacramento, CA 95809 Los Angeles, CA 90024 Librarian Institute of Governmental Studies University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720 At a meeting of the library representatives and the California City Clerks Association in 1981 and 1982, the following publications to be sent to the three designated libraries were agreed upon: Required: Charter (if applicable) and changes Municipal Code and supplements General Plan and Elements as adopted Annual Budget/Capital Improvement Program Annual Reports Optional: Rosters General Information Booklets Any publications or documents a City might believe is of sufficient interest, with the libraries having the discretion to retain, return, or destroy) 14-46 (Revised, 1987) ,H} GC 53921. Right to destroy paid or canceled bonds. Under such conditions as the treasurer of a local agency fixes, with the approval of the legislative body, he, or fiscal agents, or other duly authorized agents, may destroy or cremate any or all bonds and any or all coupons pertaining thereto which have been previously paid or canceled. GC 81008. Public records: inspection and reproduction; time; charges. Every report and statement filed pursuant to this title (Political Reform Title 9) is a public record open for public inspection and reproduction during regular business hours, commencing as soon as practicable, but in any event not later than the second business day following the day on which it was received. No conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon persons -desiring to, inspect or reproduce reports and statements filed under this title, nor shall any information or identification be required from such persons. Copies shall be provided at a charge not to exceed ten cents ($0.10) per page. Campaign statements shall be open for public inspection and reproduction from 9:00 a.m. to 5 p.m. on the. Saturday preceding an election held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in June or November in even -numbered years in the offices of Secretary of State, Registrar -Recorder of Los Angeles County, ,Registrar of Voters of San Diego County and Registrar of Voters of the City and County of San Francisco. GC 81009. Preservation of reports and statements. (a) Refers to state only. (b) Original campaign statement of mayors, city council members, county supervisors, candidates for any of these offices, and committees supporting any officeholder or candidate shall be retained indefinitely, except that original campaign statements of candidates not elected to these offices and of committees supporting candidates not elected to these offices shall be retained by filing officers for a period of not less than five years. (c) Original campaign statements of all persons shall be retained by filing officers for a period of not less than seven years. (e) Original reports and statements not specified above in this section shall be retained by filing officers for a period of not less than seven years. (f) Copies of reports or statements shall be retained by the officer with whom they are filed for a period of not less than four years, provided, however, that a filing officer is not required to retain more than one copy of a report or statement. After an original report or statement or a copy has been on file for at least two years, the officer with whom it is filed may comply with this section by retaining a copy on microfilm or other space - saving materials available for public inspection instead of the original report or statement or copy. Upon request, the officer shall provide copies of such statements pursuant to Section 81008. (g) (Editor Note: City Clerks are filing officers for other municipal candidates and office -holders.) 14-47 (Revised, 1987) HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE HSC 19850. Maintenance of building plans.* Requires the building department of every city or county to keep an official copy of the plans of every building for which a building permit has been issued for the life of the building. A microfilm copy may be kept in lieu of the original. Plans need not be filed for certain types of structures, including: (a) Single or multiple dwellings not more than two stories and basement in.height; (b) Garages and other structures appurtenant to buildings in subsection -(a); (c) Farm or ranch buildings; and (d) Any one-story building where span between walls does not exceed 25 feet - exemption does not apply to steel frame or concrete building. HSC 19851. Inspection and duplication of copy of plans. The official copy of the plans maintained by the building department of the city or county provided for under section 19850 shall be open for inspection only on the premises of the building department as a public record. Such copy may not be duplicated in whole or in part except with the written permission of the certified, licensed or registered professional or his successor, if any, who signed the original documents and the written permission of the owner of such building, or by order of a proper court. STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE S&HC 2804. Application of division.* Identifies those circumstances under which Division 4, The Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931, does not apply. S&HC 2859. Public inspection of report: resolution or ordinance of intention.* Requires the clerk of a legislative body, to keep reports on hearing concerning a public acquisition or improvement. S&HC 3111. Certification and filing of original assessment district map.* Requires the clerk of a legislative body adopting an assessment district to keep the original map of the assessment district in his or her office. S&HC 5372. Recordation of warrant, diagram, and assessment.* Requires the street superintendent to keep records of warrants, diagrams and assessments under the Improvement Act of 1911. Also requires the clerk to record a notice of assessment. S&HC 5391: Contractor's statements of payments.* Requires a street superintendent to keep a record of contractor's statements of payments received upon assessments. S&HC 5508. Recordation of reassessment and certificate.* Requires a street superintendent to make a record of reassessment, certified by the clerk, under the Improvement Act of 1911. 14-48 (Revised, 1987) . , — - S&HC 5557. Recordation of reassessment, diagram, and certificate. Requires a street superintendent to make a record, certified by the clerk, of confirmed reassessment and diagram under the Improvement Act of 1911. S&HC 5680. Keeping of office records; evidentiary effect of records.* Requires a street superintendent to keep those records required, of him under the Improvement Act of 1911. S&HC 5685. Record of service.* Requires a street superintendent to keep a record of all notices served by him or with his permission. S&HC 5700. Powers and duties; evidentiary effect of certificates; keeping of records; preparation of plans.* Requires a city engineer to keep a record of all surveys made under the Improvement Act of 1911. S&HC 5703. Where signed certificates or documents to be kept on file.* All certificates or documents required to be signed by or kept on file by the engineer of work shall be kept on file with the superintendent of streets. If a city does not have a superintendent of streets, said certificates or documents shall be kept on file with the clerk or such other officer of the city as may be designated for that purpose by the legislative body. S&HC 6425. Register of bonds.* Requires the city treasurer to keep a register of bonds issued under the 1911 Improvement Act and a file on bond coupons paid. S&HC 6445. Records of bonds, payments, penalties.* Requires the city treasurer to keep a record of all bonds issued by them, of all payments and of all penalties accruing thereon. S&HC 6448. Effect of payments.* Requires the city treasurer to keep a record of the amount and date of payment of a bond to the holder and to file the cancelled bond in their offices. S&HC 6511 Record of bond sales.* Requires the city treasurer to keep a record book of sale under the Improvement Act of 1911. S&HC 6512. Right of inspection.* Such book (see 6511) shall be open to public inspection during office hours when not in actual use. 14-49 (Revised, 1987) it S&HC 6552. Filing of affidavit.* Requires the city treasurer to keep on file affidavits of lnotice required for the conveyance of unredeemed property. S&HC 6632. Right to fee; entry of reinstatement; effect.* Requires the city treasurer to make record of the reinstatement of an improvement bond. (See also GC Sections 26205 and 34090.5.) - S&HC 8672. Bond register; data required to be entered; cancellation ;of paid bonds and coupons. The treasurer or the designated paying agent shall keep a register in his or her office showing the series, number, date, amount, rate of interest, and last known holder of each bond, and the number and amount of each interest coupon paid. The treasurer or agent shall cancel and file each bond and coupon which he or she pays. S&HC 8682. Records of auditor* Requires the city auditors keep records of unpaid assessments under the 1915 Improvement Bond Act. (See also GC Section 26907.1.) 14-50 (Revised, 1987) • t` C �• ♦ I ` CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT • The state Public Records Act, Government Code Sections 6250-6261, was created to guarantee ".. . access to information concerning the conduct of the people's business ... a fundamental and necessary right of every person .in this state!'. This general requirement for disclosure was made "mindful of the right to ... privacy'!, indicating a potential conflict between the right of public access to government records versus the right of privacy of persons who are the subject of state records. In light of this potential conflict, the legislature has required an agency withholding information to justify so doing by either showing that an exemption applies or that the public interest in not disclosing information outweights the public interest in disclosure. Asa general rule, all public records are open to the public, subject to the aforementioned balancing test or an exemption, if applicable. Public records are defined as including any writing containing information related to the conduct of the public's business prepared, owned, used or retained by any state or local agency, regardless of physical form or characteristics. A partial summary of the Public Records Act follows. Refer to the Government Code 6250-6261 for precise language. Initiative, referendum and recall petitions and related memorandum prepared by a county clerk are not public records and may be viewed only by certain government officials, or, if the petition is deemed insufficient, the proponents of it may examine the petition within a specified time period. Government Section 6254 lists exemptions of particular records, as follows: a) Agency memoranda not ordinarily retained, provided the public interest in withholding the record clearly outweights the public interest in disclosure; b) Records pertaining to pending litigation to which the agency is a party; c) Personnel or medical files, disclosure of which would be an invasion of privacy; d) Information filed with a state agency responsible for regulation or supervision of securities or of financial institutions; e) Data from utility systems development, or market or crop reports; f) Investigatory or security files of any state or local police agency (with exceptions); g) Examination data for licensing, employment or academic examinations; h) Contents of public acquisition appraisals or bids for public supply or construction contracts, until all the property of contract is attained; i) Local taxpayer information received in confidence, if disclosure would result in unfair competitive disadvantage; j) Library circulation records, except for records of fines; k) Records the disclosure of which is prohibited by federal or state law, including provisions of the Evidence Code; I) Records in the custody of the Governor or employee's of the Governor's office; m) Records in the custody of the Legislative Counsel; n) Personal financial data required by a licensing agency; o) Financial data required by the California Pollution Control Financing Authority; p) State employer-employee collective bargaining processes. 14-5 (Revised, 1987) Air pollution emission data is public, along with records of building code violations. Trade secrets, however, are not public. Employment contracts between state and local agencies and employees thereof are public records. Government agencies receiving requests for records must respond within 10 days, although in some instances an extension will be granted. Finally, the guidelines are intended as minimum standards, and state or local agencies may allow greater access to records, unless otherwise prohibited. (See also Evidence Code,, Section 1043) (Editor's Note: From California Secretary of State's 'Government Records' 1983. Subsections q -t have been added to Section 6254, but do not apply to municipalities) 14-6 (Revised, 1987) CITY CLERK RECORDS RETENTION GUID4ELINES Government Code 34090, et seq., governs the retention of all city records. With that as a basis, a suggested Retention Schedule for City Clerks' records follows: Years of Retention DUPL./ ORIG COPY M/F I. Departmental & General Subject Files A. Historical P - 1 B. General 2 1 C. Contracts, leases, insurance, franchises, etc. T+5 1 D. Court Matters, legal files C+2 1 I1. City Council, Parking and Housing Authorities, Redevelopment Agency, Boards & Commissions A. Historical B. General C. Minutes Ordinances, and Resolutions D. Agendas III. Vital Records A. Property Records (deeds, covenants, etc) B. City Budgets, Annual Financial Reports, City Compensation plans IV. Microfilm, Videotapes & Tape Recordings A. Microfilm 1. Vital Records 2. Important Records B. Videotapes P 1 2 1 P 1 2 1 P P or R,S 2 5R 5R 1. Council Meetings (GC 34090.7) 90dy,Re 90dy,Re 2. Other meetings or events not recorded in minutes or tape recorded, e.g., civic events, election nights, etc. 2Re 1 Re C. Tape Recordings2 1. Council meetings 2. Other meetings, hearings etc. 2 1 * ** ** 1 Effective 1/1/87, Brown Act requires posting of Council and other advisory body agenda 72 hours prior to a meeting. A proof of posting. is recommended and the agenda should be retained with the declaration or affidavit. (Check with City Attorney regarding retention) 2 Atty Gen Opinion 80-1006 (4/17/81): The tape recording may be destroyed at any time if the purpose for which it was made and retained was solely to facilitate the preparation of the minutes of the meeting. 14-23 (Revised, 1987) CITY CLERK RECORDS RETENTION GUIDELINES 1 ti V. Election Files A. Municipal Elections e.g., nominating papers and other documents not covered by EC 17133 B. General election correspondence, information and forms VI. FPPC Reports A. Campaign statements (81009) 1. Mayor, councilmembers, successful candidates for these offices and supporting committees (Can be microfilmed after 2 years) 2. Unsuccessful mayor and council candidates and supporting committees 3. Copies of statements filed with Clerk as filing officer 4. All other campaign statements (committees & candidates) B. Conflict of Interest (Statements of Economic Interest) 1. Mayor, councilmembers, city manager, city. attorney***, planning commissioners and candidates for these offices 2. Employees of city (designated by City's Conflict of Interest Code) C. Statements of Termination 1. Recipient committees 2. Candidates 1 (Continued) Years of Retention' DUPL./ ORIG COPY M/F 5 4 NA 4 7 NA 7 4 NA 4 7 1 ******************************************************************************* Code: C+ = Completion plus _ years Dy = Days I = lndefinate M/F = Microfilm NA = Not Applicable originals to FPPC P = Permanent Q = Quality check for microfilm EC = Elections Code GC = Government Code R = Review Re = Recycle S = Superseded T = Until terminated * = Recommended ** = Strongly Recommended *** = 7 years retention prior to 1986 filing period covered, because the originals were filed with the city 14-24 (Revised, 1987) 4 1 RETENTION SCHEDULE FOR ELECTION &,.IFPPC RECORDS ITEM BALLOTS After Election* After a Recount* CODE OF FAIR CAMPAIGN PRACTICES ENVELOPE NO. 4 Tally Sheets Copies of Index Challenge List Assisted Voters List Affidavits of Persons Assisting Voters INSPECTOR RECEIPTS FOR BALLOTS NOMINATION PAPERS AND SIGNATURES IN LIEU OF FEE PETITIONS: Initiative* Referendum* Charter Amendment* Recall* PRECINCT OFFICER APPOINTMENT FORMS ROSTER OF VOTERS ABSENTEE: Applications Identification Envelopes* FP PC MATERIAL Statements of Economic Interest Candidates (Copies) Candidates Elected Candidates Not Elected Other Campaign Statements (Copies filed with City Clerk) Other Campaign Statements and Non Specified Reports Statements of Termination Candidates (Original) Recipient committees (copies) RETENTION TIME 6 months 22 Months 30 days 6 months None Specified Term of office + four years 8 months 6 Months 5 years 6 months 6 months 4 years Indefinite 5 years 4 years 7 years 7 years 4 years NOTE: The above time frames apply unless legal action evidence. COMMENTS Subsequent to the date of the declaration of the result of the election (E.C. 14811) From completion of recount (E.C. 14831) After the Election (E.C. 12523) All voters may inspect the contents of these materials at all times following commencement of the official canvass of the votes. (E.C. 14821) Consult your City Attorney (E.C. 14600) After the certification of the results of the election for which the petition qualified or, if no election is held, 8 months after the clerk's final examination of the petition (E.C. 14700, 14900) From date of election (E.C. 14971) After date of election (E.C. 14800) Code silent, treat same as Roster of Voters. subsequent to the date of the declaration of the result of the election (E.C. 14811) (G.C. 81009f) May be microfilmed after two years (G.C. 81009b,g) (G.C. 81009b,g) (G.C. 81009f,g) (G.C. 81009c) (G.C. 81009e,f) (G.C. 81009f) is instituted involving the materials as * Not public record: Petitions found to be insufficient are open only to proponents and their representatives. 14-25 (Revised, 1987) Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council April 23,1990 City Council Meeting of April 24, 1990 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING "GRANDFATHER" CLAUSE FOR PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW ORDINANCE I have reviewed Mr. Greenwood's letter dated April 23, 1990 regarding the "grandfather" clause for the Precise Development Plan review ordinance (PDP) as it applies to the proposed hotel project to be locate at 1302 Strand. I agree with Mr. Greenwood's statements regarding the difficulty of completing the plan preparation and review process for a complex commercial project within a six month time frame. The construction drawings, consisting of shoring, grading, architectural, structural, electrical, plumbing and mechanical plans as well as engineering calculations, will require considerable time to be adequately prepared and reviewed. In addition, the staff imposed conditions of approval for the project include report requirements which address traffic impact, pavement evaluation, soils settlement, sanitary sewer impacts and a storm drain extension. These items will also require considerable time to prepare and review. It is true that "grandfather" clauses in other zoning ordinances have included six month permit deadlines; however for the most part, these ordinances have affected residential projects only. A six month permit deadline has been adequate time to complete the smaller residential projects (1 to 4 units) that make up the bulk of our permit activity. If the concept of a "grandfather" clause is to allow sufficient time for projects "in -process" to proceed to permit issuance in a reasonable amount of time, then larger complex projects should be afforded more time for plan preparation and review than the smaller residential projects. It is staff's opinion that a one year permit deadline is an adequate, not excessive, time frame for a larger, complex project to proceed to permit issuance. Staff is also concerned that the six month permit deadline may result in a undue burden on city staff to complete the project review in an unreasonable amount of time, if the developer is successful in submitting construction documents within six months. Respectfully submitted, Director of Building & Safety SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION '� GREENWOOD DEVELOPMENT April 23, 1990 Mayor Roger Creighton and Members of the City Council APR 23 7990 City Hall Civic Center Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Re: Strand Hotel Dear Mr. Mayor and Councilmembers: i wish to thank you for your consideration of the hotel project in two recent actions. In February, when changing the zoning code section which governs rooftop equipment, the Council unanimously adopted a grandfather clause addressing projects that were already approved by the City, including the hotel. In March, the Council approved a Precise Development Plan review ordinance ("PDP"), also with a grandfather clause. In both cases, a 12 month grandfather clause was approved for large projects. I respectfully request that the 12 month provision be maintained in these and any other applicable zoning ordinances that may be enacted in the future. I learned last week that a modification has been proposed to the grandfather clause included in the PDP, reducing the time period in which a grandfathered project may secure a building permit, from 12 months to only 6 months. I don't believe a 6 -month period will reasonably or fairly accommodate the hotel project. A hotel, with its unique mix of public and private spaces, is a particularly demanding planning, design and construction project. The coordinated effort of numerous team members is required to insure the best possible result. These include architects, structural engineers, civil engineers, soils engineers, traffic engineers, parking consultants, lodging market consultants, interior designers, hotel operators, landscape architects, kitchen consultants, laundry consultants, audio visual consultants and acoustic engineers. Careful and thoughtful integration of the input required from all of these people is understandably time-consuming, but is necessary to insure that this building, which will enhance the downtown for decades to come, is very well planned and designed. Of course, after we have accomplished our work, the City staff and its consultants must in turn devote a reasonable period of time to reviewing all work required for a building permit. in addition, as you know, this project is subject to a total of 43 conditions, many of which must be satisfied before a building permit is issued. With respect to some of these conditions, the City intends to hire, at our expense, its own consultants to review and approve the work of our consultants. This process alone is likely to consume considerable time. 1 1 726 SAN VICENTE BOULEVARD SUITE 500 L.A. CA 90049 213.459.4478 SUPPLEMENTAL 9 INFORMATION - 14 understand that some have advocated a 6 -month grandfather clause because clauses of similar scope have been included by the City in zoning ordinances adopted in prior years. To the best of my knowledge, however, no significant commercial development was ever intended to be included under a 6 -month grandfather clause. Rather, the 6 - month clause was designed to accommodate residential, not commercial, projects. Residential projects do not require the services of the numerous consultants necessary to this project, nor are they as complex. Accordingly, while 6 months may afford sufficient time within which an already approved residential project may obtain a building permit, it does not afford the same opportunity to an already approved commercial project such as a hotel. The Council seemed to acknowledge this state of affairs when, in February, it unanimously approved amendments to the rooftop equipment ordinance, inserting a grandfather clause that provides 6 months to smaller projects and 12 months to larger projects. Presumably, the Council adopted such a clause to insure that all reviewed and approved projects, regardless of size or complexity, were allowed the same opportunity to secure a building permit. The same was true upon initial consideration of the PDP. The staff recommended, and the Council approved, a 12 -month grandfather clause. I understood that, by adopting this clause, the Council intended to give the already reviewed and approved hotel project a fair opportunity to secure a building permit before subjecting it to a second round of review under the PDP. In fact, 12 months is the minimum period necessary to afford this project a fair and reasonable opportunity to secure a building permit. To limit the clause to 6 months would likely require this project to comply with the PDP and, in the opinion of my attorney, may subject the City to liability. No one's interest is served by requiring this project to meet an unrealistically accelerated time table. The project ... and the citizens of Hermosa Beach ... deserve thoughtful and meticulous consideration and resolution of all design and construction issues. Therefore, 1 respectfully request that the well -considered reasoning that first led to a 12 -month grandfather clause be maintained. Thank you for your consideration of this issue. cc: City Manager Director of Building & Safety Director of Planning Director of Public Works Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 90-1 April 16, 1990 Regular Meeting of April 24,1990 LOCATIONS: 1) COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AREAS ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, BETWEEN PIER AVENUE AND 24TH STREET; AND 2) MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED AREA BETWEEN 20TH AND 21ST STREET ON THE EAST SIDE OF P.C.H. INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO REZONE THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR AREAS FROM C-3, R-1, AND R-3 (MOSTLY C-3) TO A COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AND TO REZONE THE MEDIUM DENSITY DESIGNATED AREA FROM 20TH TO 21ST STREET TO R-2 IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE RECENTLY AMENDED, LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended that the Commercial Corridor designated area be rezoned to Commercial Specific Plan Area, with the exception of the residentially developed area between 18th and 21st Street east of P.C.H., which they recommended to remain with R-3 zoning. Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending that the all the areas designated Commercial Corridor on the General Plan, located north of Pier Avenue, be rezoned to Commercial Specific Plan Area by introducing. the attached ordinance. Also, staff is recommending that the block between 20th Street and 21st be rezoned to R-2 for consistency with the General Plan by introducing the second attached ordinance. Background The City Council at their meeting of 5/9/89 amended the Land Use Element of the General Plan by eliminating the Multi -Use Corridor (MUC) designation and creating the Commercial. Corridor designation. The Commercial Corridor designation was applied to the. frontage lots between 14th Street and 20th Street and north of 21st Street on the east side of P.C.H., and to the currently developed commercial areas on the west side of P.C.H. between Pier Avenue and 24th Place. The remaining MUC designated areas were General Plan amended to residential designations, including the frontage lots between 20th and 21st Streets which were designated Medium Density Residential. 1 The decision to change the residentially developed, frontage lots located between 17th Street and 20th Street on the east side was made on a 3-2 vote. The decision to redesignate the block between 20th and 21st Street to Medium Density Residential was a 4-1 vote. These were the blocks for which the Planning Commission did not make a recommendation to the City Council because there was not a majority that agreed on what the designation should be. Rezoning the northern portion of the Commercial Corridor is the final step in the implementation of the General Plan amendments regarding the Multi -Use Corridor. Analysis By amending the General Plan the City Council established the boundaries for commercial development along the corridor, and established policies for the implementation of the amendments. The proposed Specific Plan Area would establish standards and limitations to implement these policies. The City Council has already adopted a Specific Plan Area for the southern portion of the Commercial Corridor. The situation for the northern portion of the corridor is fairly, similar. However, there are more residentially developed lots with several being frontage lots, the topography is generally steeper immediately east of the Highway, and surrounding residentialareas are primarily single-family. Also the ownership is split amongst more parcels of smaller sizes (except for the large parcels at Plaza Hermosa, and the Hermosa Pavilion). Three residentially developed lots currently contain a density of over what is allowed in the R-3 zone, greater than 33 units per acre. Staff does not believe these should be allowed to be redeveloped at existing densities and, therefore, has included a limitatiion on the redevelopment of existing residential units to a maximum of 33 units per acre. Also staff believes that the difference in topography justifies a lower height limit for the east side of the highway. Otherwise staff believes the provisions established for the Specific Plan Area for southern portion of the Commercial Corridor are appropriate for this portion. As such, staff is again proposing the two tiered approach, with first tier development standards that with compliance would not require any discretionary approvals. Projects that contain any elements that go beyond these standards would trigger the requirement of a precise development plan. Staff's recommended standards are as follows: First Tier Second Tier Triggers P.D.P. Max/Min standard Height (max.): East of P.C.H.: 25 feet 35 feet West of P.C.H.: 30 feet 40 feet` Bulk (max.): 1.0 F.A.R.* none Floor Area (max.): 10,000 sq. ft. Landscaping Coverage: 5% of lot area 2% of lot area (Required buffer from R -zone not included) *Gross Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio (excludes parking structures) The recommended height standard for west of P.C.H. has been adjusted to be consistent with the standards adoptedfor the southern portion of the Commercial Corridor. The only difference in these standards from those adopted for the southern portion of the Commercial Corridor is, the first tier height limit for the east side of P.C.H. is proposed to be five (5) feet lower in recognition of the steeper slope from the Highway and in recognition of the nearby single-family residential development which is limited to a 25 -foot height limit. none °RESIDENTIAL AREAS BETWEEN 18TH AND 20TH This portion of the Commercial Corridor was recommended to be maintained at R-3 zoning by the Planning Commission. This is inconsistent with the general plan amendment adopted by the City Council which changed this area from High Density Residential to Commercial Corridor. 'Besides the more obvious reason that the Commercial Specific Plan Area zoning is necessary to implement the General Plan, staff would like to note the following reasons in favor of a Commercial Corridor/Specific Plan designation rather than a residential designation for the frontage lots. 1. The adverse environmental consequences of allowing people to live adjacent to a highway which carries 50,000 vehicles per day. These include the air pollution and noise constantly generated by the vehicles. This situation would only worsen and would effect more individuals if conversion to higher density residential is allowed. 2. The loss of prime highway frontage lots with commercial potential to an exclusively residential category would mean the City would be losing one if its last potential commercially viable areas. 3. The Specific Plan Area would still allow existing conforming residential uses to be maintained or reconstructed at current densities, meaning the conversion to commercial uses would likely occur only if and when it becomes economically feasible. RESIDENTIAL AREA - 20TH TO 21ST STREET Although staff believes that this area Should also be designated commercial at some time in the future, staff is currently recommending a rezoning to R-2 to be consistent with the General Plan. If the Council agrees to rezone the frontage lots between 18th and 20th Street to commercial, the Council may wish to start the process for reconsidering this block for a Commercial Corridor designation on the General Plan. CO CUR: %/ Michael Schiibach - Planning Director /f7 'Kevin'Northcraft City Manager` /77 obertson Associate Planner Attachments 1. Proposed Ordinances 2. General Plan and Zoning Maps 3. Parcel Maps 4. P.C. Staff Report, P.C. Minutes 3/20/90 5. P.C. Resolution 90-21 6. Resolution 89-5270 7. City Council Minutes 5/3/89 8. Correspondence p/pcsrncc 4 4 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE 96 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE:TO'CREATE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 8, FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED, BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE`DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City. Council held a public hearing on April 24, 1990, to receive public testimony regarding Zone Change 90-1, the establishment of specific plan area zones 'in the Commercial Corridor area located east and west of Pacific Coast Highway between Pier Avenue and 24th Place, and made the following findings: A. A specific plan area zone will implement the policies contained in resolution 89-5270 adopted by the City Council, by establishing standards more restrictive than the C-3 zone to regulate commercial development to ensure compatibility with adjacent residential areas along Pacific Coast Highway, and bring the zoning into consistency with the General Plan; B. The height limits will lessen the potential view impact of commercial development; C.. Landscaping requirements will improve the buffering of. commercial development from residential uses, buffering residents from noise and visual impacts, and will contribute towards improving the appearance of commercial projects; D. The review of individual projects for compliance with the standards contained in the specific plan area, and for the purpose of considering the view impact of individual projects by the Planning Commission will serve to further ensure that commercial development will not be incompatible with existing residential neighborhoods; E. The rezoning to specific plan areas will result in a 2 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 development character 1 for the !subject areas which is appropriate for the surroundings; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa .Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the zoning map be amended as shown on the attached maps and described as follows, and the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Rezone the Commercial Corridor General Plan designated area located on _the. east and west side of Pacific Coast Highway between Pier Avenue and 24th Place to Specific Plan Area No. 8,' legally described as follows: Eastside: 14th Street to 15th Street: Lots 1-3, inclusive, Block 1, Hermosa Knob Hill Tract; Lots 28-30, inclusive, Heffner Fiorini, Allen Tract 15th Street to 16th Street: Lots 1-3, inclusive, Heffner, Fiorini, Allen Tract; West 145 feet, Portion of lot 5, Block 84, 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach; Lots 1-3, inclusive, Block 2, W. J. Smith's Tract 16th Street to 17th Street: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, W.J. Smith's Tract; Lots 1-4, inclusive, Block A, Tract #2911; Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Breckenridge Tract 17th Street to 18th Street: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Breckenridge Tract; Lot 24-27, inclusive, Block 2, Johnson and Newman's Camino Real Tract 18th Street to 19th Street: Lots 1-3, inclusive, P.M. 38-45; lot 26-28, inclusive, Block 1, Johnson and - Newman's Camino Real Tract; Lots 1,3,4,5, Tract 6054 19th Street to 20th Street: Lots 62-64, inclusive, Tract 2548; Lots 1-3, inclusive, Tract 8456 North of 21st Street: Lots 1 and 2, portion of lots 3, 4, and 8, lots 9 and 10, portion of lot 11, lots 20 and 21, Tract #2143; Lot 1, Parcel Map 152-48-49 Westside: 24th Street to 24th Place: Lots 1-10, inclusive, Block 2, Montmarie Tract 24th Street to 21st Street: Lots 13-19, inclusive, Hermosa View Tract #1; Lot 1 Tract 38200 16th Street to 21st Street: Portion of lot 13, Portion lot 14, Block 81, 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach 16th Street to Pier Avenue: Lot 1, Tract # 9203; Portion of lot 10, Block 80, 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach; Lots 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 11-18, inclusive, Block 80., Subdivision of Part of the Sausal Redondo Rancho Tract; ' SECTION 2. The following text 'shall be added to.,the zoning ordinance: Article 9.6, Chapter 8, Specific Plan Area No. 8 Section 9.68-1. Authority. 11` This Specific Plan Area is an, instrument for implementing the General plan pursuant to Article 8, Chapter 3., of the State of California Planning and Zoning Law (California Government Code: Section 65450 et. Seq.) Section 9.68-2 Location and Description,. The subject area is located on the east and west side of Pacific Coast Highway and is designated as Commercial Corridor on the Official General Plan Map. Section 9.68-3 Purpose. The purpose of the Specific Plan Area is to set forth the development requirements, standards and permitted uses for the subject area, and to carry out the policies of the Commercial Corridor General Plan area as stated in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Section 9.68-4 Permitted Uses. A. Commercial permitted uses shall be the same as those permitted in C-3 General Commercial Zone as contained in Section 8-4 of the City of Hermosa Beach zoning ordinance, and nonconforming uses shall be subject to the provisions of Article 13, Nonconforming Building and Uses of the zoning ordinance. B. A property being,. exclusively used for .residential purposes at the date of the adoption of this ordinance shall be permitted to be continued as a residential use, maintaining its conforming status, and may be remodeled or redeveloped as a residential use as long as the density (number of dwelling units) is not_ increased and does not exceed 33 units per acre. C. Residentially developed properties or vacant properties can only be converted to commercial uses if the property fronts on Pacific Coast Highway or is an assemblage of properties which front on Pacific Coast Highway. D. Properties with existing commercial uses or other than residential uses which do not front on Pacific Coast Highway may be used commercially, expanded, and/or remodeled, if the existing access is maintained. 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 E. Any residential use which`\sharps a lot or parcel with a commercial use shall be considered.a nonconforming use and subject to Article 13 of the zoning ordinance. Section 9.68-5 Residential Development Standards A. In respect to height, yard, setback, open space, and dimensional requirements, any residential project whether new or a remodel of an existing structure shall be subject to the provisions contained in the zoning ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach, depending on the applicable zoning district. The applicable residential zoning district shall be determined based on the nearest residential zoning district on the same block. Section 9.68-6 Commercial Development Standards A. Purpose and Intent. The standards and guidelines are designed to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Hermosa Beach arid to encourage the development of high quality commercial development along Pacific Coast Highway in respect to its impact on residential projects, environmental impacts, circulation, and appearance. B. Standards. Two sets of standards apply in this specific plan area, First Tier and Second Tier. Compliance with First Tier standards allows the project to proceed with a building permit. If a project goes beyond any of the first tier standards the procedure for submittal and approval of a Precise Development Plan• shall be followed. Developments must be in compliance with Second Tier standards at all times. Project sponsors are encouraged to discuss preliminary plans of proposed projects with the Planning Department before making any formal applications for building permits or Precise Development Plans. First Tier Second Tier Maximum/Minimum Maximum/Minimum Requirements Requirements 1. Maximum Height: East of P.C.H.- 25 feet 35 feet West of P.C.H.- 30 feet 40 feet 2. Bulk: Max. 1.0 F.A.R.* none *Gross Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio (excludes parking structures) 3. Maximum Size: 10,000 sq. ft. none Gross Floor Area 1 2 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. Min. Landscape Coverage: First Tier \. Maximum/Minimum Requirements 5% of lot area Second Tier. Maximum/Minimum Requirements 2%. of lot area (The required landscape buffer between commercial and residential zones shall :,not be- included in this calculation) C. Requirements. The following -requirements apply to all proposed projects: 1. Landscaping Specifications a) A minimum three (3) foot wide -'planter strip with raised 6" curbing, or an area equivalent in size to a 3 -foot wide planter strip along the front of the lot, shall be provided along street frontage. A 5 -gallon shrub shall be provided for each 20 sq. ft. b) Landscaping Buffer from residentially zoned property: A Minimum ,five (5) foot wide planter strip landscaped with a minimum of one 24 -inch or 15 -gallon size specimen tree provided for every 10 feet of length. Six (6) inch high raised concrete curbing shall be provided along the perimeter of all landscaped areas except on the side abutting building walls, or fences. d) All landscaped areas shall include an automatic irrigation system. e) The landscape plan and irrigation system shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. 2. The development, including the landscaping and the entire property grounds, shall be maintained in and clean manner. a neat 3. Setback from Residentially Zoned Property: A minimum of eight (8) feet plus two (2) feet for each additional story. 4. All other development standards shall be governed by the City of Hermosa Beach Zoning Ordinance, including, but not limited to Article 8, Commercial Zones, and Article 11.5, Off -Street Parking; with the exception of Article 14, Division 3, Precise Development Plans. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 9.68-6. Precise Development Plan.\\ A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to set•forth the procedures and guidelines for review of' Precise Development Plans, which are required when a proposed project exceeds any one ofthe First Tier standards. B. Guidelines for Planning Commission, review 1. General Guidelines: To allow prolyects- which''exceed any of the first tier -`-standards, the overall building and project design should be of a superior quality, be compatible with surrounding properties, and be designed in scale with the community. The Planning Commission shall consider the following in making this determination: a. The building should be designed with interesting architectural features and materials to enhance the overall project. A three-dimensional quality should be emphasized by the use of stepping architectural features to avoid massive flat building faces. Specialattention should be given to the appearance of the building from the street. b. Landscaping should be utilized throughout the site in a manner which enhances the building and the site, and to mitigate the visual impacts of any flat and/or massive parts of the building. c. The project should be compatible with neighboring projects with respect to height, scale, bulk, proportion. This is not a prescription for similar architectural styles, although in some cases it may be desirable, nor a prescription to match existing buildings, as many existing buildings do not „s.tand scrutiny under these guidelines. d.. Architectural renderings and perspectives must be submitted to show the three dimensional quality of the proposed building(s). 2. Height. To allow projects to exceed the first tier height limits the building design should incorporate features to minimize and break-up the visual impact and view impacts of the higher structures on neighboring residential areas and on the streetscape. The Planning Commission shall consider the following guidelines in making this determination: a. Limit lot coverage of uppermost level: The area of the portion of the structure which exceeds the first tier height limit should not cover a major portion of. the lot area, and said 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28. 1 over -height area \should be compensated by a proportional area of the building which is at or less than the height limit. b. Flat roofs and flat tall vertical walls should be avoided: Stepped, variable, or sloping roofs should be encouraged. The appearance of flat roofs and massive flat vertical walls should be avoided through the use of stepping or tiered architectural features. c. Greater setbacks for upper levels.:- Progressing from the first floor to the -uppermost story of the building setbacks from the rear property line should increase and exceed minimum requirements, and the upper stories shall have tiered setbacks from the lower levels as viewed from the front. . Bulk. To allow projects which exceed the maximum Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio (F.A.R.) the building design should incorporate features to minimize the appearance of bulk, and to compensate for the bulk of a building with attractive architectural features which enhance the building and which reduce the visual impact of large areas of flat vertical walls. The Planning Commission shall consider the following guidelines in making this determination: a. Avoid "box -like" structures: Significant and attractive architectural features should be used to break up the bulky appearance of "box -like" structures. b. Building step -backs: Step-ins and Step -outs should be used on the front of the building to 'break up the bulky appearance. This could accompany varying widths of the landscape planter area in the front of the building. , c. Variable heights: The roof -line of the building should should be designed with variable heights, and roof patterns or materials, to avoid the appearance of a flat building. 4. Landscaping. The objective of the landscaping requirement is to enhance the overall project including the streetscape, to complement the building design, to break up the impact of vast expanses of pavement, to buffer sound and visual impacts on neighboring residential areas, to provide shade for parking areas and to deflect direct sunlight into the interior of buildings.. To allow less than the minimum 5% coverage, a landscaping plan must compensate for the loss of coverage by providing a superior design through the use of types, quantity, and location of plant materials to achieve the objectives described above. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B. General Criteria. In considering the Precise Development Plan for any development, the following criteria for granting or conditionally granting said permit ' shall be considered: 1. Distance from existing residential uses in relation to negative effects. 2. Impact on ocean views from residential areas 3. The amount of existing or proposed off-street parking in relation to actual need. 4. The combination of uses proposed, as they relate to compatibility. 5. The relationship of the ,estimated generated traffic volume and the caacity and safety of streets serving the area. 6. The proposed exterior signs and decor, and the compatibility thereof with existing establishments in the area. 7. Building and driveway orientation in relation to sensitive uses, e.g., residences and schools. 8. Noise, odor, dust and/or vibration that may be generated by the proposed use. 9. Impact of the proposed use to the city's infrastructure, and/or services. 10. Adequacy of mitigation measures to minimize environmental impacts in quantitative terms. 11. Other considerations that, in the judgment of the Planning Commission, are necessary to assure compatibility with the surrounding uses, and the city as a whole. . Criteria for denial. 1. The proposed development would substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity or interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in such area, because of excessive dissimilarity or inappropriateness of design in relation to the surrounding vicinity, and there are no known conditions of approval which can be imposed that could resolve such problems. 2. The proposed development would have significant environmental adverse impacts which can not be mitigated, and where the finding of overriding considerations cannot be made. m•it \ The decision of the" Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by filing a written appeal within ten (10) days of the Planning Commission's decision. E. An approved Plan shahl be valid for a one (1) year period and, should development fail to commence within such time limitation and no extension is granted, shall become null and void. F. No person shall violate or fail .0. comply with any approved plan or any condition or'provision thereof, nor shall a building; permit be, issued for any building or structure which would violate or fail to comply with an approved Plan. G. General Procedures and submittal. requirements. 1. Application for Precise Development Plan review shall be filed and approval given prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Applications shall include detailed and fully dimensioned site plans, building plans, floor plans, architectural drawings and elevations including perspective drawings to exhibit the required three-dimensional features, landscape plans and/or any other data found to be reasonably required 3. Applications shall be submitted to the City Planning Department and shall be in compliance with the department's specific requirements. 4. Fees for submittals shall be set by policy of -the City Council. SECTION 3. Amend Ordinance No. 89-1004 regarding the moratorium on the issuance of building permits for the "Multi -Use Corridor to exclude the above described properties rezoned by this ordinance. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 5. The City Council shall designate the City Attorney to prepare a summary of this ordinance to be published pursuant to Government Code Section 36933(c) (1) in lieu of the full text of said ordinance. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the .passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in - f3 - 2 3 4 5. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the book of original`,`ordirances of said city, and shall make minutes of)the passage and 'adoption thereof in the records 'f the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this_ day of , 1990. ATTEST: p/ccrsncc PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK 5 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE 90- s. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing 1990, to receive Northern Portion public testimony regarding '''Zone - on April 24, Change 90-1, of the Commercial Corridor, which included consideration of a zone change for the Medium Density Residential designated property located between 20th and 21st.. .on the east side of Pacific Coast Highway, and made the following findings.:. A. Rezoning the subject property to R-2 will bring the zoning into consistency with the recently amended General Plan; B. Rezoning the subject property to R-2 will prevent the construction of high density multi -family projects allowed under current R-3 zoning, which this property would otherwise be subject to when Interim Ordinance 89-1004, which established a moratorium on the issuance of building permits in the Multi -Use Corridor, expires; C. The character of residential development allowed under R-2 zoning would be compatible with surrounding residential development; NOW, THEREFORE,the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the zoning map be amended as shown on the attached maps and described as follows: SECTION 1. Rezone the area located on the east side of Pacific Coast Highway between 20th Street and 21st Street from R-3 Multi -Family Residential to R-2 Two -Family Residential, legally described as follows: - Lots 4-7 inclusive, Tract No. 8476 - /'6- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12. 13 14 15 16 17 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 2.This ordinance shallbeComel of �fect`ive and be In full force and effect from and 'after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption.. 1 SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration, of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shell cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation publish ed and circulated in the City of'Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4.' The City Clerk shall certify_ to the'passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall, make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, rand ADOPTED this day of , 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: AP • ; Ig D A'iTO FORM: a/persnr2 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY LD LD W HILL CREST PROSPECT, HILLCREST N,. RHOOES MD GOLDEN ti = MI CORONA BONNIE I r BRAE BORDEN P4 CIF/C LD 1 2 CO4 sr 84RD OS CIVIC CEN TER :T os VALLEY LD AVENUE r LD LD I MD LD LD L MD HD GC CH -70171 -re GC HO HD Ave LONA HD ••• R4 2 PROSPECT' ol•CA R4 0$ UNCLASS R -I • DRIVE R -I RHODES i0111 RAYMONO AVE R -I Sr • R -I sPRotOFIELD R -I A VA fir• - 4 AREA TO BE CONSIDERED FOR REZONING TO COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA `R -2 OS - r),k I os 7 DITO BE CONSIDERED FOR REZONING TO R-2 +7,44 ,4 4 NE Approx. Dist. Dist. Similar Use- Current Use St. Address Lot Use Date Cond. from from Adjacent Across Slope Zone Conform - 14th to 15th Size Const. PCH ECB* Uses -Street ing? NS 14th St. 1402 P.C.H. 7897 Com/Auto 1923 Good / 0-106 - SFR/bhd SFR Mod. C-3 Yes 823 14th St. 2600 SFR 1955 Fair 106-141 0 Comm./W. SFR Steep R-2 Yes 827 14th St. 3725 SFR pre/56 Fair 141-191 35 Yes SFR Steep R-2 Yes 833 14th St. 3725 SFR 1946 Good 191-241 85 Yes Sfr Steep R-2 Yes 845 14th St. 3725 SFR 1952 Fair 241-291 135 Yes SFR Steep R-2 Yes SS 15th St. 1414 P.C.H. 17010 Com/Auto 1966 Fair 0-126 SFR/bhd Com/SFR Mod/Stp R-2 Yes 830 15th St. 5670 SFR 1928 ' Fair 126-168 0 C to W. SFR Steep R-2 Yes 834 15th St. 5670 2 Det. 28/83 Fair 168-210 42 Yes SFR Steep R-2 Yes 840 15th St. 5670 SFR 1926? Fair 210-252 84 Yes SFR Steep R-2 Yes 842 15th St. 5670 2 det. 1924 Good 252-294 126 Yes SFR Steep R-2 Yes *Existing Commercial Boundary 15TH ST. h f? V34- 840 Z4Z 043 UZ7 X33 • 5 N.763d' 14TH. v 4 ST. COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL -TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) /9 - EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY r NE Approx.' St. Address • Lot Use •Date Cond. 15th to 16th Size Const. NS 15th St. / 'I Dist. Dist. Similar ' Use from from Adjacent Across PCH ECB* Uses Street 1500 P.C.H. 2835 Comm. 1970 Fair 0-42 1514 P.C.H.. 5670 Vac. - 0-84 809 15th St. 2835 Dup. 1973 Fair 42-84 815 15th St. 5670 Vac. 84-126 825 15th St. 5670 SFR 1928 Fair 126-168 829 15th St. 5670 SFR 1928 Fair 168-210 835 15th St. 5670 3UCon. 1989 un/Cons. 210-252 845 15th St. 5670 3UCon. 1989 un/Cons. 252-296 SS 16th St. / Res/bhd Comm. Com/S. 0 W/Com/E/Vac Comm. 42 ` Res. Comm. 84 Yes SFR 126 Yes 2FR 168 Yes SFR; 210 Yes SFR' Slope Current' Usb Zone Conform- ,ing? Mod. C-3 C-3 Steep R -1C Steep R -1C Steep R-2 Steep R-2 Steep R-2 Steep R-2 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes 1530 P.C.H. 12600 Vac. - 0-150 Res/bhd 'Mod. C -3/R-1 1550 P.C.H.• 6600 Vac. - 0-150 Com/N/Res/bhd - • Mod. C -3/R-1 - 1560 P.C.H. 11400 -Comm. 1977 Good 0-150 Res/bhd ;Com. Steep C-3 Yes 832 15th P1. 4790 3uApt. 1956 Fair 150-200 Vac/W. 2FR Steep R-2 No 836 15th Pl. 5230 3uApt. 1958 Fair 200-250 Yes SFR Steep R-2 Yes' 840 15th P1. 5230 3uApt. 1957 Fair 250-300 Yes 2FR Steep R-2 Yes 832 16th St. 3800 Dup. 1975 Good 150-200 0 Com/W. SFR Steep R-1 No 836 16th St. 3800 SFR 1952 Good 200-250 50 Yes SFR Steep R-1 Yes 846 16th St. 380.0 Dup. 1955 Fair 250-300 100• Yes SFR Steep R-1 No 7- --; 1fj fl1 • ST. COMMERCIAL ' 171-1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ' MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY • �V I :61i g27 76 6' l gI1(j STH • - �I• ST. E - 2S *NE St. Address . 16th to 17th 1600 P.C.H. 1630 P.C.H. WS Raymond 1601 1609 1613 1617 1623 1633 Raymond Raymond Raymond Raymond Raymond Raymond ES Raymond 1610 Raymond 1620 'Raymond 1628 Raymond 1632 Raymond SS 17th St. 824 17th St. 1641 Raymond 840 17th St. 850 17th St. ra Lot Size Use 7600 Comm. 20020 Comm. 2330 2330 2330 2330 2330 4660 4660 4660 3500 3500 4030 2360 2280 3160 COMMERCIAL SFR SFR SFR SFR SFR SFR Approx. Dist. Date Cond. from Const. PCH 1962Fair 0-100 1958 Fair / 0-100 1959 1960 1960 1958 1958 1953/78 SFR <1950 SFR <1950 SFR 54/69 SFR 1955 Dup. SFR SFR SFR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL •(three or more units) • EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY 1924 1950 1947 1947 COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY Good Fair Good Good Good Good Good Fair Fair Fair Good Fair Good Fair 100-180 100-180 100-180 100-180 100-180 100-180 220-300 220-300 220-300 220-300 95-150 150-180 220-250 250-290 0 .0 U < 160090 Dist. Similar from Adjacent/ ECB* Uses - Res/bhd Res/bhd 0 Com/bhd O Com/bhd 0 Com/bhd O Com/bhd O Com/bhd O Com/bhd 120 120 120 120 0 55 125 155 Yes Yes Yes Yes Com/W. Yes Yes Yes Use Across Street - Comm. . Comm. SFR SFR SFR SFR SFR SFR SFR SFR SFR SFR SFR SFR SFR SFR Slope Steep Steep Steep Steep Steep Steep Steep Steep Steep Steep Steep Steep Steep Steep Steep Steep 40 W U• 4 iQ Current Zone Use Conform- ing? C-3 ' Yes C-3 R-1 R-1 R-1 R-1 R-1 • Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes .Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes /0 40 1(D30 .ri.r. rrr ti ° 16TH •• • 1 C NE Approx. Dist. Dist. Similar Use . Current Use St. Address Lot Use Date• Cond. PCEIm ECB* Adjacent Across Street Slope Zone Conform- 17th on ong� 17th to 18th Size Const. 1706 P.C.H. 7600 Comm. 1966 Fair. 0-100 - Res/sur Comm. Steep C-3 Yes 829 17th St. 3800 SFR 1928 Good 100-150 0 Com/W. SFR Steep R-1 Yes 833 17th St. 3890 SFR 1962 Good 150-200 50 Yes SFR Steep R-1 Yes dv.• 837 17th St. 3800 SFR 1969 Good 200-250 100 Yes SFR Steep R-1"?: Yes 845 & 909' 6080 2Units 1921 Good 250-330 150 Yes SFR Steep R-1 No SS 18th St. 1734 P.C.H. 5500 SFR 1946 Fair •0-100 Com/S. C-3 No 1738 P.C.H. 5500 SFR <1929 Fair 0-100 - Yes 2FR Steep C-3 No 826 18th St. 5500 SFR <1956 Good 100-150 - Yes SFR Steet R-1 Yes 830 18th St. 5500 SFR <1956 Poor / 150-200 - Yes SFR Steep R-1 Yes 840 18th St. 5500 SFR 1945 Poor 200-250 Yes SFR Steep R-1 Yes $46 18th St. 2750 SFR 1972 Good 250-275 - Yes SFR Steep R-1 • Yes' 850 18th St. 2750 SFR 1973 Good 275-300 - Yes SFR Steep R-1 Yes DO PACIFIC COAST ri 4 f7tL rA COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY - ' COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY NE St. Address Lot 18th to 19th • Size 1824 P.C.H. 5000 1830 P.C.H.. 2500 1834 P•C.H.. 6300 1840 P.C.H.. 6300 1450 P.C.H. 6300 %too'.c . �-l• 4zea NS 18th St. 803 18th St. 2500 809 18th St. 2500 817 18th St. 2500 821 18th St. 3750 825 18th St. 3750 1801 Rhodes 3750 1809 Rhodes 3750 1815 Rhodes 3750 1821 Rhodes 3750 1827 Rhodes •3750 1835 Rhodes 6300 1843 Rhodes 6450 1851 Rhodes 6450 V, Use Com/Res. SFR 3uApt SFR COMMERCIAL 4uApt Dup. Dup. Dup. SFR Approx. Date Const. 1951 1924 1924 <1940 1964 1972 1972 1972 1971 SFR SFR 1959 SFR 1959 SFR 1959 SFR 1958 SFR 1958 SFR 1974 SFR 1977 SFR 1960 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (thcee or more units) EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY :COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY Dist. Cond. from PCH Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair 0-100 0-100 0-130 0-130 0-130 Fair / 0-33 Fair 33-67 Fair 67-100 Fair 100-125 Fair 125-150 Fair 150-275 Fair 150-275 Good 150-275 Good 150-275 Good 150-275 Good 130-280 Good 130-280 Fair 130-280 90 Dist: 'Similar \ from Adjacent ECB* Uses Res/sur. - Com/S. - ' Yes } - Yes ,Yes .Usp Across Street 4FR Mod. Mod. Mod. Mod.. Mod. Current Zone R -3C R -3C R -3C R -3C R -3C Use Conform- ing? No Yes - Com/bhd SFR Steep R -3C Com/bhd SFR ; .Steep R -3C - Com/bhd SFR Steep R -3C - Com/bhd SFR Steep R-1 Yes SFR Steep R-1 - Yes SFR Steep R-1 Yes SFR Steep R-1 - Yes SFR Steep R-1 - Yes SFR Steep R-1 Yes SFR Steep R-1 - Yes SFR Steep R-1 - Yes SFR Steep R-1 - Yes SFR Mod. R-1 *Existing Commercial Boundary Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0/o3 ge,9 1517 • &z1 52s • Z3IBTH 4 _ST. NE Approx. St. Address Lot Use Date 18th to 19th Size Const: SS 19th St. 802 19th St. 3780 2uApt. 1971 824 19th St. 1900 SFR 1985 826 19th St. 1900 SFR 1985 830 19th St. 1900 SFR 1970 834 19th St. 1900 SFR 1970 838 19th St. 1900 SFR 1970 842 19th St. 1900 SFR <1940 848 19th St. 1900 SFR 1924 Dist. Dist. Similar Use Current Cond. from from Adjacent Across Slope Zone PCH ECB* Uses Street Use Conform- ing? 0-105 Yes MFR Mod. R -3C Yes 105-130 Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Yes 130-155 - Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Yes 155-180 Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Yes 180-205 - Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Yes 205-230 - Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Yes 230-255 Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Ye S' 255-280 Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Yes 1S VOO D I d I Odd ,e� 2.\5' MOS VA 5-'24 Y. :b f� 1 ��! I 5 •: • ST ..............' :•••••••.:.:. :•::•:;: 5-'24 Y. :b f� 1 ��! I 5 •: • ST ..............' ; Vi,tt:%:: :•::•:;: .'.^ti✓;:':..' ..Vr.: •:. .. ..:tis::.. j•• ds • �gTH ezl 31.5 •635 • • t. ST. COMMERCIAL 17.1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY 4, eeeee . COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY NE St. Address Lot 21 St.to Pier. Size NS 19th St. Use Approx. Date Const. 1 Dist. Dist. Similar Cond. from from Adjacent PCH ECB* Uses Use - Across Slope Street,. Current'. Use • ZoneConform- ing? 1906 P.C.H. 6840 .3uApt. <1940 Poor 0-90 Yes MFRS Mod. R -3C Yes 821 19th St. 2280 SFR 1962 Good 90-120 - Yes SFR; Mod. R-1 Yes 825 19th St. 2280 1962 Good 120-150 - Yes SFR' Mod. R-1 • Yes 829 19th St. 2280 1962 Good 150-180 Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Yes 835 19th St. 3800 1949 Good 180-230 - _ Yes SFR- Mod. R-1 Yes 841 19th St. 1900 1960 Good 230-255 Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Yes 849 19th St. 1900 1924 Fair 255-280 Yes (SFR Mod. B=1 Yes SS 20th St. 1918 P.C.H. 3700 SFR 1941 Fair 0-100 - Yes - Mod. R -3C Yes / 1924 P.C.H. 3700 SFR 1941 Fair 0-100 - Yes - Mod. R -3C Yes 1934 P.C.H. 3850 SFR <1956 Fair 0-100 Yes SFR Mod. R -3C Yes 826 20th St. 3900 SFR no/rec. Good 120-160 Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Yes 834 20th St. 3900 SFR 1941 Fair 160-200 - Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Yes 840 20th St. 3900 SFR 41/79 Good 200-240 Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Yes 850 20th,St. 3900 SFR 1941 Fair 240-280 Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Yes 19th to 21st NS 20th St. 2006 P.C.H. 4400 SFR 1941 Fair 0-100 Yes SFR Mod. R -3C Ye:. 2014 P.C.H. 4400 SFR 1941 Fair 0-100 Yes SFR Mod. R -3C Yes 821 20th St. 3900 SFR 1954 Fair 120-160 Yes SFR MOd. R-1 Yes 831 2Oth St. 3900 SFR 1941 Fair 160-200 - Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Yes 841 20th St. 3900 SFR 1941 Fair 200-240 - Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Yes 849 20th St. 3900 SFR 1941 Fair 240-280 Yes SFR ,;MOd. R-1 Yes / SS 21st St. 2024 P.0 H. 4400 SFR 1941 Poor 0-100 MFR/N. Mod: R -3C Yes 2040 P.0 H.. 4800 5UApt. 1987 Good 0-100 - SFR/sur. Comm. Mod. R-1 Yes 826 21st St. 3600 SFR 1941 Fair 120-160 - MFR/W. Comm. Mod. R-1 Yes 832 21st St. 4000 SFR no/rec. Fair 160-200 - Yes Comm. Mod. R-1 Yes 840 21st St. 4400 SFR 1941 Fair 200-240 - Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Yes 850 21st St. 4800 SFR 41/82 Good 240-280 - Yes SFR Mod. R-1 Yes N of 21st St. 2100 P.C.H./ 807 21st St. 6773 Comm/Rest. 1984 Fair 0-75 - Yes MFR: Mod. C-3 Yes 2200 P.C.H. 27280 Com/Off. 1982 Good 0-165 - Res/b-hd . SFR _ Mod. C-3 Yes 2212 P.C.H. 3750 Com/Auto. 1966 Fair 0-75 - Yes -`, Mod. C-3 • Yes 2306 P.C.H. 8250 Com/Off. 1982 Good 70-165 Yes - Mod. C-3 Yes T SEE. *Existing Commercial Boundary COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAIf TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL -IL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) L7 EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY BOUNDARY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA NW St. Address Lot 24 P1.-24 St. Size SS 24th P1. Use Approx. Dist. Dist. Similar Use Current Use Date Cond. from from Adjacent Across Slope Zone Conform- Const. PCH ECB* Uses Street ing? 2447 P.C.H. 15120 Com/Off. 1985 Good/ - Res/bhd Comm. ' Steep C-3 Yes 740 24th P1. 4050 SFR 1952 Fair 140-178 0 Com/E. MFR Steep R-1 Yes 730 24th P1. 4050 SFR 1952 Fair 178-215 40 Yes SFR Steep R-1 Yes 720 24th P1. 8100 SFR 1949 Fair 215-290• 80 Yes SFR Steep R-1 Yes NS 24th St. 2401 P.C.H. 9720 Com/Off. 1977 Good - - Res/bhd Com/Off. Steep C-3 Yes 747 24th St. 2700 SFR 1976 Fair 90-115 0 Com/bad/E. SFR Steep R-1 Yes 741 24th St. 2700 SFR 1976 Good 115-140 25 Com/bad/E. SFR Steep 11-1 Yes 739 24th St. 2700 SFR 1979 Good 140-165 50 Yes SFR Steep R-1 Yes 733 24th St. 2700 SFR 1979 Good 165-190 75 Yes SFR Steep R-1 Yes 725 24th St. 5400 SFR 46/79 Fair 190-240 100 Yes SFR Steep R-1 Yes 717 24th St. 5400 SFR 1948 Fair 240-290 150 Yes SFR Steep R-1 Yes ii 24TH • -7Z0 • 742: •sd• PL. 1 i'7 72-5 733 731 Q 24TH 74 • 0 ST. a-' a .12,4ci /0J COMMERCIAL ElSINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL . TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY _RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY 90 •-) COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY -PACIFIC COAST ...#.. • .. \ %%4Miobs.it..4%4NN1 �'•'•' ::•.. • �..: ' ?res?' :P:• � • \��` .. 7:::••:1:8 .:.32 :•:-2n:•••• •:2:1:.:. =:22:: 23::::4''.: �� 1 i'7 72-5 733 731 Q 24TH 74 • 0 ST. a-' a .12,4ci /0J COMMERCIAL ElSINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL . TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY _RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY 90 •-) COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY -PACIFIC COAST NW St. Address Lot 24 St. -21 St. Size Use Approx. Date Const. Dist. 'Cond. from PCH Dist.' Similar Use from Adjacent Across' ECB* , Uses .Street Current Slope Zone Use Conform- ing? SS 24th St. Yes 2309 P.C.H. 9500 COMM. 1978 Good / 0-90 - Res/bad Comm. Steep C-3 740 24th St. 8100 3U 1954 Fair 90-165 0N Com/E. SFR Steep R-1 No Yes SFR Steep R-1 Yes 732 24th St. 2700 SFR 1986 Good 165-190 75 R-1 Yes Good 190-215 100 Yes SFR • Steep 730 24th St. 2700 SFR 1987 ) . 728 24th St. 2700 SFR 1986 Good 215-240 125 Yes SFR, Steep R-1 Yes 724 24th St. 2700 SFR 1986 Good 240-265 150 Yes SFR', Steep R-1 Yes 720 24th St. 2700 SFR 1987 Good 265-290 175 Yes SFR Steep R-1 Yes NS 21st St. 2205 P.C.H. 8475 Comm. 1985 Fair 0-113 - Res bad Mod. C-3 Yes Mod. C-3 No 2121 P.C.H. 5750 7UApt. 1971 Fair 0-115- Com W/SFR bad � - Corner PCH -21 8050 Vac. - - 0-115 - - MFR Mod. C-3 - Com/E. MFR Mod. C-3 No 739 21st St.. 6860 SFR 1924 Poor 115-150 0 No Yes MFR Mod.- C-3 737 21st St. 6860 SFR 1924 Poor 150-185 35 No 731 21st St. 6860 2Det.- 1923 Fr/Pr 185-220 70 Yes MFR Mod. C-3 6860 Vac. - - 220-225 105 MFR Mod. R -1C - Vacant _ Vacant 6860 - Vac. - 255-290 140 MFR Mod. R -1C COtM1ERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or pare units) EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY 24TH 7;r 724- 77 730 7,2L " 740, ST .$• . • PROPOSED COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY ST. sa • co i H '.HA i'65 Z IA W SA p•G P 7 D3 tn cil ` N Ci. u H ,r, 4 o iL H t+ W [-1 U u3 t.9 ££n N Np P C4 CCA tJ U tail Z H N • • ,6 • 71 1 H . $ I H • ' V4 1 1 w. Approx. Dist. Dist. Similar Use Current Use NW Zone Conform - St. Address Lot Use Date Cond. from from Adjacent Across.: Slope ing?rm 21 St.to Pier Size Const. PCH ECB* Uses Street . SS 21th St. Mod. R -3C No SFR/Vac. 724 21st St. 13410 20UApt. 1968 Fair :155-245 Yes , 718 21st St. 6705 6UApt. 1961 Fair . 245-290 5FR/W. Vac. Mod. R -3C No Along P.C.H. 2001 P.C.H. 86452 95UApt. 1960 Fair 0-290 Comm/S, Mod.. R -3C No R -3C No Mod. 1901 P:C.H. 4725 Com/Res. 1935 Poor. 0-105 MFR/sur. 1845 P.C.H. 74240 Vac. - 0-290 MFR/sur. Mod. C -3/R -3C - 1821 P.C.H. 37120 1000Apt. 1970 Fair 0-290 Yes Mod. R -3C No ' 1803 P:C.H. 18560 28UApt. 1961 Fair 0-290 Yes - Mod. R -3C No 1731 P.C.H. 18560• 28UApt. 1963 Fair 0-290 Yes - Mod. R -3C No 1707 P.C.H. 43500 72U Condo 1971 Fair 0-290 i- Com/S. - Mod. R-3 No 1637 P.C.H. 87000 Comm. 1988 Good 0-290 MFR/N. - Mod. C-3 Yes 1559 P.C.H./ Plaza Hermosa 255000 Comm. 1987 Good 0-547 Res/N. Com/Res Mod. C-3 Yes 1437 P.C.H.. 34510 Comm. 1963 Fair 0-156 Yes Comm. Mod. C-3 Yes NE St. Address Lot 15th to 16th Size 1559 P.C.H./ Plaza Hermosa 255000 Comm. 1987 Good 0-547 - Res/N. Com/Res Mod. C-3 Yes 1437 P.C.H.. 34510 Comm. 1963 Fair 0-156 - Yes Comm. Mod. C-3 Yes. Use Approx.• Dist. Dist. Similar Use Date Cond. from from Adjacent Across Slope Const. PCH ECB* Uses Street Current Use Zone Conform- ing? SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY CHOpt a(1ND. MATER/AL March 12, 1990 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of March 20, 1990 Hermosa Beach Planning Commission SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 90-1 LOCATIONS: 1) COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED. AREAS ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, BETWEEN PIER AVENUE AND 24TH STREET; AND 2) MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED AREA BETWEEN 20TH AND 21ST STREET ON THE EAST SIDE OF P.C.H. INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO REZONE THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR AREAS FROM C-3, R-1, AND R-3 (MOSTLY C-3) TO A COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AND TO REZONE THE MEDIUM DENSITY DESIGNATED AREA FROM 20TH TO 21ST STREET TO R-2 IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE RECENTLY AMENDED LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN Recommendation Staff is recommending that the areas designated Commercial Corridor on the General Plan, located north of Pier Avenue be rezoned from their current zoning classifications of C-3, R-1, and R-3 (The majority being C-3) to Commercial Specific Plan Area No. 8, which only slightly differs from Commercial Specific Plan Area No. 7. Also staff is recommending that the block between 20th Street and 21st be rezoned to R-2 for consistency, but that the Planning Commission recommend that this block be considered for a General Plan Amendment to Commercial Corridor and rezoning to Specific Plan Area as part of our 2nd Quarter General Plan Amendments. Background The City Council at their meeting of 5/9/89 amended the Land Use Element of the General Plan by eliminating the Multi -Use Corridor (MUC) designation and creating the Commercial Corridor designation. The Commercial Corridor designation was applied to the frontage lots between 14th Street and 20th Street and north of 21st Street on the east side of P.C.H., and to the currently developed commercial areas on the west side of P.C.H. between Pier Avenue and 24th Place. The remaining MUC designated areas were General Plan amended to residential designations, including the frontage lots between 20th and 21st Streets which were designated Medium Density Residential. The decision to change the residentially developed frontage lots located between 17th Street and 20th Street on the east side was made on a 3-2 vote due to the controversy of the issue and the vocal opposition to commercial development on this section of the highway. The decision to redesignate the block between 20th and -33-. 21st Street to Medium Density Residential was a44-1 vote. were the blocks for which the Planning Commission did not recommendation to the City Council because there was majority that agreed on what the designation should be. On February 20, 1990, the Planning Commission recommended zone changes to Commercial Corridor Specific Plan" for the southern portion of the Commercial Corridor. These make a not a Rezoning the northern portion of the Commercial Corridor is the final step in the implementation of the General Plan amendments. The rezoning needs to be completed prior to August of 1990 when the moratorium on these remaining areas expires. ' Analysis By amending the General Plan the City Council established the boundaries for commercial development along the corridor, and established policies for the implementation •of the amendments. Our effort now is to establish standards and limits to apply to future development along the corridor which will both allow for reasonable development of the area and protect neighboring residential uses. Staff and the Planning Commission have already worked out a set of standards and limitations for the southern portion of the Commercial Corridor. The situation for the northern portion of the corridor is fairly similar, however, the topography is generally steeper immediately east of the Highway and not as steep further up the slope, the surrounding residential areas are primarily single-family, and the ownership is split amongst more parcels of smaller sizes (except for the large parcels at Plaza Hermosa, and the Hermosa Pavilion). Also, this portion of the Highway provides a break from the otherwise exclusively strip commercial pattern as multi -family condos and apartments are located on the west side and single and two-family projects on the east side. Additionally, the commercial uses are not dominated by automotive related businesses. Statistical Information Area: 15.6 Acres Number of separate ownership parcels: 40 Lot Sizes: Less than 5,000 square feet 15 5,000- 10,000 square feet 14 Greater than 10,000 square feet 11 Median Size: 6,840 square feet Staff believes that the difference in topography justifies a lower height limit for the east side of the highway. Otherwise i" staff believes the provisions established/ for the southern portion are appropriate for this portion.` ; As such, staff is again proposing first tier development standards that with compliance would not require any discretionary approvals. Projects that contain any elements that go beyond these standards, however, would trigger the requirement of a precise development plan, requiring public hearings, Planning Commission approval, and environmental review (traffic impacts would be considered as part of the environmental review). This concept requires two tiers of development standards: 1) Standards that if exceeded would trigger the precise development plan requirement and which the Planning Commission would have authority to waive if certain guidelines are followed, and; 2) Maximum or minimum standards which could not be exceeded except through a Variance. Staff's recommended standards are as follows: First Tier Second Tier Triggers P.D.P. Max/Min standard Height (max.): East of P.C.H.: 25 feet 35 feet West of P.C.H.: 35 feet 45 feet Bulk (max.): 1.0 F.A.R.* none Floor Area (max.): 10,000 sq. ft. none Landscaping Coverage: 5% of lot area 2% of lot area (Required buffer from R -zone not included) *Gross Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio (excludes parking structures) The following standards would apply in all circumstances as maximum/minimum standards Landscaping Min. 3' wide planter strips with Specifications: raised 6" curbing, or an area equivalent in size, along street frontage, 5 -gallon shrub for each 20 sq. ft. Setback from R -zone: 8 feet plus 2 feet for each add'l story Buffering from R -zone: Min. 5' wide planter strip with 24-inch/15 gallon tree every 10 feet The only difference in these standards from those recommended for the southern portion of the Commercial Corridor is the height limit for the east side of P.C.H. which has been lowered five (5) feet in recognition of the steeper slope from the Highway and to lessen potential view blockage to nearby single-family 1 residential development which is limited' to\a/25-foot height limit. In regards to the block between 20th and 21st which is designated Medium Density on the General Plan rather than Commercial Corridor, staff believes that there is no basis for differentiating this block from the other P.C.H. frontage parcels. Although staff is recommending that this area be rezoned to R-2 for consistency, staff believes that the Planning Commission should also recommend that this area be included as part of the the 2nd Quarter General Plan Amendments for redesignation to Commercial Corridor and rezoning to Commercial Specific Plan Area. COI'CUR : �, 9 Michael Schubach Ken Roberson 'Associate Planner Planning Director Attachments 1. General Plan and Zoning Maps 2. Parcel Maps 3. Proposed Resolutions 4. Resolution 89-5270 5. City Council Minutes 5/3/89 6. Planning Commission Minutes a/pcsrncc ZONES CHANGES FOR THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION AS FOLLOWS OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONES AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND ADOPTION OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION; (A) FROM C-3. R-1 AND R-3 TO COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA FOR THE AREA ALONG EAST AND WEST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BETWEEN PIER AVENUE TO 24111 STREET �3— P.C. Minutes 3/20/90 (B) FROM R-3 TO R-2 FOR THE AREA ON EAST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BETWEEN 20TH STREET TO 21ST STREET Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated March 12, 1990. Staff recommended that the areas designated commercial corridor on the general plan located north of Pier Avenue be rezoned from their current zoning classifications of C-3, R-1, and R-3 (the majority of which are R-3) to commercial specific plan area No. 8, which only slightly differs from commercial specific plan area No. 7. Staff also recommended that the block between 20th Street and 21st Street be rezoned to R-2 for consistency, but that 20th Street and 21st Street be rezoned to R-2 for consistency, but that the Planning Commission recommend that this block be considered for a general plan amendment to commercial corridor and rezoned to specific plan area as part of the 2nd quarter general plan amendments The City Council at their meeting of May 9, 1989, amended the land use element of the general plan by eliminating the multi -use corridor designation and creating the commercial corridor designation. The commercial corridor designation was applied to the frontage lots between 14th Street and 20th Street and north of 21st Street on the east side of P.C.H. and to the currently developed commercial areas on the west side of P.C.H. between Pier Avenue and 24th Place. The remaining MUC designated areas were general plan amended to residential designations, including the frontage lots between 20th and 21st Streets which were designated medium density residential. The decision to change the residentially developed frontage lots located between 17th and 21st Streets on the east side was made on a 3-2 vote due to the controversy of the issue and the vocal opposition to commercial development on this section of the highway. The decision to redesignate the block between 20th and 21st Streets to medium density residential was a 4-1 vote. These were the blocks for which the Planning Commission did not make a recommendation to the City Council because there was not a majority that agreed on what the designation should be. On February 20, 1990, the Planning Commission recommended zone changes to commercial corridor specific plan for the southern portion of the commercial corridor. Rezoning the northern portion of the commercial . corridor is the final step in the implementation of the general plan amendments. The rezoning needs to be completed prior to August of 1990 when the moratorium on these remaining areas expires. By amending the general plan, the City Council established the boundaries for commercial development along the corridor and established policies for the implementation of the amendments. The effort now is to establish standards and limits to apply to future development along the corridor which will both allow for reasonable development of the area and protect neighboring residential uses. Staff and the Planning Commission have already worked out a set of standards and limitations for the southern portion of the commercial corridor. The situation for the northern portion of the corridor is fairly similar, however, the topography is generally steeper further up the slope, the surrounding residential areas are primarily single family, and the ownership is split amongst more parcels of smaller sizes, except for the large parcels at Plaza Hermosa and the Hermosa Pavilion. Also, this portion of the highway provides a break from the otherwise exclusively strip commercial pattern as multi -family condos and apartments are located on the west side and single- and two-family projects on the east side. Additionally, the commercial uses are not dominated by automotive related businesses. The area at issue is 15.6 acres, and there are 40 separately -owned parcels. There are 15 parcels of less than 5000 square feet; 14 parcels between 5000 and 10,000 square feet; and 11 parcels greater than 10,000 square feet. The median size is 6840 square feet. P.C. Minutes 3/20/90 Staff felt that the difference in topography justifies a lower height limit for the east side of the highway. Otherwise, staff felt that the provisions established for the southern portion are appropriate for this portion. As such, staff again proposed first tier development standards that with compliance would not require any discretionary approvals. Projects that contain any elements that go beyond ,these standards, however, would trigger the requirement of a precise development plan, requiring public hearings, Planning Commission approval, and environmental review. Traffic impacts would be considered as part of the environmental review. This concept requires two tiers of development standards: (1) standards that if exceeded would trigger the precise development plan requirement and which the Planning Commission would have authority to waive, if certain guidelines are followed, and; (2) maximum or minimum standards which could not be exceeded through a variance. First tier triggers for the precise development plan are: a maximum height of 25 feet east of P.C.H.; 35 feet west of P.C.H. Maximum bulk would be 1.0 floor area ratio. Maximum floor area would be 10,000 square feet. Landscaping coverage would be 5 percent of the lot area, but a required buffer from R -zones is not included. Second tier minimum/maximum standards are: Maximum height of 35 feet east of P.C.H.; 45 feet west of P.C.H. There is no maximum bulk or floor area. Landscaping coverage would be 2 percent of the lot area. The following standards would apply in all circumstances as maximum/minimum standards: (1) landscaping specifications: minimum three-foot wide planter strips with raised six-inch curbing, or an area equivalent in size, along street frontage, five -gallon shrub for each 20 square feet; (2) setback from R -zone: eight feet plus two feet for each additional story; and (3) buffering from R -zone: minimum five-foot wide planter strip with 24-inch/15-gallon tree every ten feet. The only difference in these standards from those recommended for the southern portion of the commercial corridor is the height limit for the east side of P.C.H. which has been lowered five feet in recognition of the steeper slope from the highway and to lessen potential view blockage to nearby single-family residential development which is limited to a 25 -foot height limit. In regard to the block between 20th Street and 21st Street, which is designated medium density on the general plan rather than commercial corridor, staff felt that there is no basis for differentiating this block from the other P.C.H. frontage parcels. Although staff recommended that this area be rezoned to R-2 for consistency, staff felt that the Planning Commission should also recommend that this area be included as part of the 2nd quarter general plan amendments for redesignation to commercial corridor and rezoning to commercial specific plan area. Comm. Moore commented that the existing development on the east side of the highway between 17th and 21st Streets is strictly residential, and he asked what options are available for that area, stating that he is not at all persuaded that it should be developed as commercial. He understood the requirements to bring zoning and the general plan into conformance, as required by State law; however, he noted that the general plan can be changed to conform with the zoning. Mr. Schubach stated that that area was previously designated as multi -use corridor with C - potential. He stated that, if so desired by the Commission, a general plan amendment could be recommended to redesignate that particular area as residential. If this recommendation is made, the Commission would then not go forward with the proposed zone changes. Public Hearing opened at 10:08 P.M. by Chmn. Ingell. - ^7J P.C. Minutes 3/20/90 Jim Caines, 819 18th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) strongly favored. a residential redesignation for the east side of the highway between 17th and 21st Street, noting that this has long been a residential area and would be inappropriate for commercial development; (2) favored a residential classification so that if there is. a disaster, people could rebuild their homes. Vic Cravello, 1632 Havemeyer Lane , Redondo Beach, addressed the Commission and:- (1) said that his mother-in-law owns the property at 2024 P.C.H.; (2) said that the property was zoned R- 3 when she purchased it; (3) stated that he favors a residential designation for -that area by way of a general plan amendment. . -- Mr. Schubach clarifiedthat there is a policy stating that "existing structures used for residential purposes on a lot or parcel which is exclusively used for residential purposes are permitted to remain indefinitely and shall be considered conforming uses, allowing said structures to be improved, rebuilt, or expanded as long as existing residential density is not increased." Jack Ander, 521 Gentry Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) passed out a copy of a , petition with 80 signatures from people who desire the area to be residential; (2) read aloud the petition, which asserts that the people protest the commercial intrusion into the residential area; (3) urged that the area retain R-3 zoning; (4) discussed the lots in the northeast area between 18th and 21st Streets and stated that because of the steep slope and the residential uses, commercial use is not appropriate; (5) said that R-3 is appropriate because there is commercial on the other side of the highway; (6) said that some of the people who signed the petition favor R-3, however, they would prefer a 30 -foot height limit, as opposed to the 35 feet allowed inR-3; (7) noted that there are many vacancies in the existing commercial buildings along P.C.H.; (8) stated that there are many existing commercial structures in other locations of the City which badly need revitalization; therefore, this residential area should not be sacrificed for more commercial usage; (9) discussed past City Council actions on this particular area; (10) stated that with the new City Council members, there could be an entirely new view on this issue. George Dvorsky, speaking on behalf of his parents who own a lot at 2015 P.C.H., addressed the Commission and: (1) favored retaining the R-3 zoning, explaining that it would be consistent with what 'is currently there; (2) stated that single-family, R-2, is not appropriate on the highway, especially since single-family homes many times have children, and the highway is not a safe environment for children; (3) asked for clarification on the staff report in regard to staffs recommendation for this particular area, to which Mr: Schubach explained the' recommendation; (4) asked that the area remain R-3. Scott Sergeant, 2008 Rhodes Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that he supports the petition which he signed, explaining that residential would be more appropriate than commercial in this particular area; (2) asked for clarification on what a commercial specific area is; (3) stated that he would rather have R-3, with a 35 -foot height limit than commercial, with a 45 -foot height limit; (4) stated, however, that he might support commercial at 30 feet, rather than residential at 35 feet; (5) said that there is not enough information available for residents to make an informed decision; (6) said that he supports R-3, with a height limitation of 35 feet. Patty Egerer, 925 15th Place, addressed the Commission and: (1) said she owns a lot at the northeastern corner of 17th Street and P.C.H.; (2) said that the lot was purchased specifically for commercial development as was the adjacent lot; (3) favored retaining P..C.H. as a commercial corridor; (4) did not feel that the incline has any bearing on whether or not the area is suitable for commercial use. - Dorothy Zammit, 1918 Pacific Coast Highway, addressed the Commission and: (1) said she has lived there since 1976; (2) stated that she is very happy living there; (3) stated that the issue at P.C. Minutes 3/20/90 hand is actually that of "the almighty buck"; (4) felt that some people favor commercial zonin • so that they can make more money on their property; (5) stated she is not interested in making more money from her property, she is interested only in living there; (6) stated that her neighbors are also happy living there and they do not want commercial; (7) strongly favored the retention of residential zoning. Juanita Swing, 1206 Green Lane, Redondo Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that she owns property at 2006 P.C.H.; (2) stated that she favors R-3 rather than R-2; and; (3) objected to commercial. Jim Fucile, 1226 6th Street, Manhattan Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that he owns property at the corner of 21st Street and P.C.H.; (2) asked a number of questions of staff related to why the Lucky Market property was left out of this zone change request; (3) noted concern over a specific plan area, and he discussed potential problems which can arise; (4) asked questions of staff on why a specific plan area is being recommended; (5) noted concern that many people are not aware of what the requirements are; (6) asked whether there are other available alternatives; (7) asked whether what is being proposed is proportional to current property values; (8) questioned whether a specific plan area is in effect a downzoning of property; (9) stated that he would prefer to have a straightforward designation; (10) asked questions of the city attorney related to staff's recommendation; (11) stated that the zoning code should clearly state what is permitted. Marianne Caines, 817 18th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that many residents on the highway have made their feelings known for years that they prefer to have it remain residential; (2) felt that the east side of the highway between 17th Street and 21st Street is not appropriate for commercial development; (3) said that the quality of life for residents is more important than additional commercial development; (4) noted that the property in question is view property; (5) stated that the property at 17th Street which was purchased specifically for commercial development could have some special consideration. Mary Hanson, 841 19th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) asked questions about the parking requirements for the proposed specific plan area; (2) favored the controls which are being proposed; (3) discussed specific properties as depicted on the map; (4) noted that the area has a very dense population, and new developments will very heavily impact the area; (5) noted concern over height and density; (6) noted concern over views and preservation of the community; (7) stated that the issue of slopes must be addressed; (8) stated that just one commercial development with inadequate parking can very heavily impact the residential areas; (9) stated that each individual piece of property and each development should be addressed, and strong controls must be imposed in order to reduce the impacts; (10) strongly favored controlling what can be developed within the specific plan area requirements. Public Hearing closed at 10:44 P.M. by Chinn Ingell. Comm. Peirce noted that, if so desired by the Commission, the general plan could be changed rather than the zoning. Mr. Lee explained that it would then be appropriate to not take any action at all, and make an alternative recommendation to the City Council. Comm. Moore asked whether it would be appropriate to go forward with all of the proposed zone changes, with the exception of the certain limited area on the east side of the highway between 18th and 21st Street. Mr. Lee replied in the affirmative. Comm. Peirce felt that the staff work was very good on the proposed phased standards. especially on the south side. His only concern related to whether it should be commercial or residential from 18th Street to 21st Street. P.C. Minutes 3/20/90 Comm. Ketz questioned the block between 17th and 1th Streets, noting that it is already zoned C-3, and there is already some commercial development there. She noted that the blocks from 18th Street to 21st Street are zoned R-3. She therefore favored residential zoning on the east side of the highway between 18th and 21st Streets. Chmn. Ingell noted that he initially opposed any residential along the highway; however, after much research he has determined that residential uses along the highway can be appropriate. He noted that many people have testified that they like living along the: highway. He favored staffs recommendation and the two-tiered approach, and he stated that he- could support residential along the east side of the highway from 18th to2lst Street: - MOTION by Comm. Moore, seconded by Comm. K.etz, to approve the staff -recommended zone changes, Resolution P.C. 90-21, with the exception of that portion on the east side of Pacific Coast Highway between 18th Street and 21st Street. Comm. Moore stated that this action will not solve the existing inconsistencesbetween the general plan and zoning, and that issue must be addressed in the future. AYES: Comms. Ketz, Moore, Peirce, Chmn. Ingell NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. Rue P.C. Minutes 3/20/90 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 RESOLUTION P.0 90 21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO CREATE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 8, FOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on March 20, 1990, to receive public testimony regarding Zone Change 90-1, the establishment of specific plan area zones in the Commercial Corridor area located east and west of Pacific Coast Highway between Pier Avenue and 24th Place, and made the following findings: A. A specific plan area zone will implement the policies contained in resolution 89-5270 adopted by the City Council, by establishing standards more restrictive than the C-3 zone to regulate commercial development to ensure compatibility with adjacent residential areas along Pacific Coast Highway, and bring the zoning into consistency with the General Plan; B. The height limits will lessen the potential view impact of commercial development; C. Landscaping requirements will improve the buffering of commercial development from residential uses., buffering residents from noise and visual impacts, and will contribute towards improving the appearance of commercial projects; D. The review of individual projects for compliance with the standards contained in the specific plan area, and for the purpose of considering the view impact of individual projects by the Planning Commission will serve to further ensure that commercial development,will not be incompatible with existing residential neighborhoods; E. The rezoning to specific plan areas will result in a -y3- 1 2 3 4 6 7 9 10 11 1'2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 development character for the'. subject .areas which is appropriate for the surroundings; F. The existing residential uses along the east side off Pacific Coast Highway between 18th and 21st Street are appropriate. for this location and should not be rezoned to commercial; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California,'does:hereby recommend that the zoning map be amended as shown on the attached maps and described as follows, and the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Rezone the Commercial Corridor General Plan designated area located on the east and west side of Pacific Coast Highway between Pier Avenue and 24th Place excluding the area east of the Highway between 18th and 20th Street to Specific Plan Area No. 8, legally described as follows:_ Eastside: 14th Street to 15th Street: Lots 1-3, inclusive, Block. 1, Hermosa Knob Hill Tract; Lots 28-30, inclusive, Heffner Fiorini, Allen Tract 15th Street to 16th Street: Lots 1-3, inclusive, Heffner, Fiorini, Allen Tract; West 145 feet, Portion of lot 5, Block 84, 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach; Lots 1-3, inclusive, Block 2, W. J. Smith's Tract 16th Street to 17th Street: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, W.J. Smith's Tract; Lots 1-4, inclusive, Block A, Tract #2911; Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Breckenridge Tract 17th Street to 18th Street: Lots 1 and.2, Block 1, Breckenridge Tract; Lot 24-27, inclusive, Block 2, Johnson and Newman's Camino Real Tract North of 21st Street: Lots 1 and 2, portion of lots 3, 4, and 8, lots 9 and'10, portion of lot 11, lots 20 and 21, Tract #2143; Lot 1, Parcel Map 152-48-49 Westside: 24th Street to 24th Place: Lots 1-10, inclusive, Block 2, Montmarie Tract 24th Street to 21st Street: Lots 13-19, inclusive, Hermosa View Tract #1; Lot 1 Tract 38200 16th Street to 21st Street: Portion of lot 13, Portion lot 14, Block 81, 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach 1 2 3 4 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 16th Street to Pier Avenue:\Lot 1, Tract # 9203; Portion of lot 10, Block 80, 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach; Lots 11-18, inclusive, Block 80, Subdivision of Part of the Sausal Redondo Rancho Tract; SECTION 2. The following text shall be added to the zoning ordinance: Article 9.6, Chapter 8, Specific Plan Area No. 8 Section 9.68-1. Authority. This .Specific Plan Area is an instrument for implementing the General plan pursuant to Article 8, Chapter 3, of the State of California Planning and Zoning Law (California Government Code Section 65450 et. Seq.) Section 9.68-2 Location and Description. The subject area is located on the east and west side of Pacific Coast Highway and is designated as Commercial Corridor on the Official General Plan Map. Section 9.68-3 Purpose. The purpose of the Specific Plan Area is to set forth the development requirements, standards and permitted uses for the subject area, and to carry out the policies of the Commercial Corridor General Plan area as stated in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Section 9.68-4 Permitted Uses. A. Commercial permitted uses shall be the same as those permitted in C-3 General Commercial Zone as contained in Section 8-4 of the City of Hermosa Beach zoning ordinance, and nonconforming uses shall be subject to the provisions of Article 13, Nonconforming Building and Uses of the zoning ordinance. B. A property being exclusively used for residential purposes at the date of the adoption of this ordinance shall be permitted to be continued as a residential use, maintaining its conforming status, and may be remodeled or redeveloped as a residential use as long as the density (number of dwelling units) is not increased. C. Residentially developed properties or vacant properties can only be converted to commercial uses if the property fronts on Pacific Coast Highway or is an assemblage of properties which front on Pacific Coast Highway. D. Properties with existing commercial uses or other than residential uses which do not front. on Pacific Coast Highway may be used commercially, expanded, and/or remodeled, if the existing access is maintained. 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 E. Any residential use which shares a`lot\ or parcel with a commercial use shall be considered,a nonconforming use and subject to Article 13 of the zoning ordinance. Section 9.68-5 Residential Development Standards A. In respect to height, yard, setback, open space, and dimensional requirements, 'any residential project whether new or a remodel of an existing structure shall be subject to the provisions` contained in the zoning ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach, depending on the applicable zoning district. The applicable, residential zoning district shall be determined based on the nearest residential zoning district on the same: block. Section 9.68-6 Commercial Development Standards A. Purpose and Intent.. The standards and guidelines are designed to protect the health, 'safety, and welfare of the citizens of Hermosa Beach and to encourage the development of high quality commercial development along Pacific Coast Highway in respect to its impact on residential projects, environmental impacts, circulation, and appearance. B. Standards. Two sets of standards apply in this specific plan area, First Tier and Second Tier. Compliance with First Tier standards allows the project to proceed with a building permit. If a project goes beyond any of the first tier standards the procedure for submittal and approval of a Precise Development Plan shall be followed. Developments must be in compliance with Second Tier standards at all times. Project sponsors are encouraged to discuss preliminary plans of proposed projects with the Planning Department before making any formal applications for building permits or Precise Development Plans. First Tier Second Tier Maximum/Minimum Maximum/Minimum Requirements. Requirements 1. Maximum Height: East of P.C.H.- 25 feet 35 feet West of P.C.H.- 35 feet 45 feet 2. Bulk: Max. 1.0 F.A.R.* none *Gross Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio (excludes parking structures) 3. Maximum Size: . 10,000 sq. ft. none Gross Floor Area 1 2 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. Min. Landscape Coverage: 5% of lot area 27 of lot area (The required landscape buffer between commercial and residential zones shall not be included in this calculation) . C. Requirements. The following requirements apply to all proposed projects: 1. Landscaping Specifications A minimum three (3) foot wide planter strip with raised 6" curbing, or an area equivalent in size to a 3 -foot wideplanter strip along the'front of the lot, shall be provided along street frontage. A 5 -gallon shrub shall be provided for each 20 sq. ft. 2. Setback from Residentially Zoned Property: A minimum of eight (8) feet plus two (2) feet for each additional story. 3. Landscaping Buffer from the Residential Zone: A Minimum five (5) foot wide planter strip landscaped with a minimum of one 24 -inch or 15 -gallon size specimen tree provided for every 10 feet of length 4. Six (6) inch high raised concrete curbing shall be provided along the perimeter of all landscaped areas except on the side abutting building walls, or fences. 5. The development, including the landscaping and the entire property grounds, shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner. 6. All other development standards shall be governed by the City of Hermosa Beach Zoning Ordinance, including, but not limited to Article 8, Commercial Zones, and Article 11.5, Off -Street Parking. Section 9.68-6. Precise Development Plan. A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to set forth the procedures and guidelines for review of. Precise Development Plans, which are required when a proposed project exceeds any one of the First Tier standards. B. Guidelines for Planning Commission review 1. General Guidelines: To allow projects which exceed any of the first tier standards, the overall -517 - 1 3 4 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 building and project designshould\ be of a superior quality, be compatible with surrounding properties, and be designed in scale withthe community. The Planning Commission shell consider the following in making this determination: a. The building should be designed with interesting architectural features and materials to enhance the overall project. A three-dimensionsal quality should be emphasized by the use of stepping architectural features to avoid massive flat building faces. Special ,attention should be given to the appearance of the building from the street. b. Landscaping should be utilized throughout the site in a manner which enhances the building and the site, and to mitigate the visual impacts of any flat and/or massive parts -of the building. c. The project should be compatible with neighboring projects with respect to height, scale, bulk, proportion. This requirement is neither aprescription for similar architectural styles, although in some cases it may be desirable, nor a prescription for existing mediocrity, as many existing buildings do not stand scrutiny under these guidelines. d. Architectural renderings and perspectives must be submitted to show the three dimensional quality of the proposed building(s). 2. Height. To allow projects to exceed the first tier height limits the building design should incorporate features to minimize and break-up the visual impact and view impacts of the higher structures on neighboring residential areas and on the streetscape. The Planning Commission shall consider the following guidelines in making this determination: a. Limit lot coverage of uppermost level: The area of the portion of the structure which exceeds the first tier height limit should not cover a major portion of the lot area, and said over -height area should be compensated by a proportional area of the building which is at or less than the heightlimit. b. Flat roofs and flat vertical walls should be avoided: Stepped, variable, or sloping roofs should be encouraged. The appearance of flat roofs and massive flat vertical walls should be avoided through the use of stepping or tiered architectural features. c. Greater setbacks for upper levels: Progressing from the first floor to the uppermost story of 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C l the building setbacks from the rear property line should increase` and exceed minimum requirements, and the upper stories shall have tiered setbacks from the lower levels as viewed from the front. 3. Bulk. To allow projects which exceed the maximum Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio (F.A.R.) the building design should incorporate features to minimize the appearance of bulk, and to compensate for the bulk of a building with attractive architectural features which enhance the building and which reduce the visual impact of large areas of flat vertical walls. The Planning Commission shall consider the following guidelines in making this determination: a. Avoid "box -like" structures: Significant and. attractive architectural features should be used to break up the bulky appearance of "box -like" structures. b. Building step -backs: Step-ins and Step -outs should be used on the front of the building to break up the bulky appearance. This could accompany varying widths of the landscape planter area in the front of the building. c. Variable heights: The roof -line of the building should should be designed with variable heights, and roof patterns or materials, to avoid the appearance of a flat building. 4. Landscaping. The objective of the landscaping requirement is to enhance the overall project including the streetscape, to complement the building design, to break up the impact of vast expanses of pavement, to buffer sound and visual impacts on neighboring residential areas, to provide shade for parking areas and to deflect direct sunlight into the interior of buildings. To allow less than the minimum 5% coverage, a landscaping plan must compensate for the loss of coverage by providing a superior design through the use of types, quantity, and location of plant materials to achieve the objectives described above. B. General Criteria. In considering the Precise Development Plan for any development, the following criteria for granting or conditionally granting said permit shall be considered: 1. Distance from existing residential uses in relation to negative effects. 2. Impact on ocean views from residential areas 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12:. 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. The amount of eXisting ort. proposed off-street parking in relation to actual need. 4. The combination of‘uses proposed, as .they relate to compatibility. , 5. The relationship of the estimated generated traffic volume and the capacity and safety of streets serving the area. 6. The proposed exterior signs and decor, and the compatibility thereof with_. existing establishments in the area. 7..._ Building and driveway orientation in relation to sensitive uses, e.g., residences and schools. 8: Noise, odor, dust and/or vibration generated by the proposed use. 9. Impact of the proposed use to infrastructure, and/or services. that may be the city's 10. Adequacy of mitigation measures to minimize environmental impacts in quantitative terms. 11. Other considerations that, in the judgment of the Planning Commission, are necessary to assure compatibility with the surrounding uses, and the city as a whole. C. Criteria for denial. D 1. The proposed development would substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity or interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in such area, because of excessive dissimilarity or inappropriateness of design in relation to the surrounding vicinity, and there are no known conditions of approval which can be, imposed that could resolve such problems. 2. The proposed development would have significant environmental adverse impacts which can not be mitigated, and where the finding of overriding considerations cannot be made. The decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by filing a written appeal within ten (10) days of the Planning Commission's decision. E. An approved Plan shall be valid for a one (1) year period and, should development fail to commence within such time limitation and no extension is granted, shall become null and void. F. No person shall violate or fail to comply with any approved plan or any condition or provision thereof, _so - 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • nor shall a building peri it be issued for any building or structure which would violate or fail to comply with an approved Plan. G. General Procedures and submittal requirements. 1. Application for Precise Development Plan review shall be filed and approval given prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Applications shall include detailed and fully dimensioned site plans, building plans, floor plans,architectural drawings and elevations including perspective drawings to exhibit the required three-dimensional features, landscape plans and/or any other data found to be reasonably required 3. Applications shall be submitted to the City Planning Department and shall be in compliance with the department's specific requirements. 4. Fees for submittals shall be set by policy of the City Council. VOTE: AYES: Chrmn.Ingell.Comms.Peirce.Ketz.Moore NOES: None ABSTAIN:None ABSENT: Comm.Rue CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 90-21 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission o the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their re fit�armg g�' M� ch 20, 1990y_... i , -- : , 2 1 Michael Schubach, Secretary �Scptt Ing 9,6 Date airman a/perscc HEFFNER_ FIpRIN ALLEN 'rte f Erb mos( K Mo ►3 1+1 '("R►a-cl' ►,n,B.—i—I4Ft 1 4141 gT- .90 16 M ST. .4.)0 M 2 A .20 • su 22 3 .50 O 3LK 2 O 5 CITY Oi a /51.4. O /v5 1 az • AS /.d5.67 R 19. Aa. /65.67 2 SE: bele .02 I • /7 3 15TH 50.73 1 -0.67 5%o,: LK 84 841 0.//Mc.. 50.73 0/1.k .v� s0 0 6 .5o PL. PL. ti a0 2 ao 4 /9 5 O 6 ez . 15TH • Z n7 ST. C.5 avtd R -I 6176) S. P. A W.in. J. 5M ITFFS TRR(.T ri.3. 9-1.5 Z.nd A-Cldii-loN 4-o I+Ei mo3A- I':EP1C f m•3. 3-11-1z e 'nc.r, F iorcni, • Ailen Tr4c.4- he, • 13. 9-iob '16TH; • DR EL KEN1RIDGE '5 TT Acr rfb —"IZ TRAST Na 2 11I rr►• B • 2c1— 19 RAYMOND. /s 6 ST.'" 95 Oi22 48.50 iscei( V t. 4550 /.SOLI 30 ri5. 80'1 v .� BLK.'2. f O I .� 95 ..- /00 BO •I 6 • • 2BLk.A N76:34i 7 ., ` e8/ N 0 4 O:9 2' BLK..E . /s IO / 20 II • , it / 4 '16TH; • DR EL KEN1RIDGE '5 TT Acr rfb —"IZ TRAST Na 2 11I rr►• B • 2c1— 19 RAYMOND. /s 6 ST.'" PACIFIC COAST SO RHODES St - 60 • 0 . 2 as ak 4125- pc-se. 125e. Z 50 BRr_c.1<ENRTDGE'S_ TR RC -T m.B. 9-1Z 4. JOHNc r".13.` . _� r- .. ''ON Anil, , ._ . 8.J.0 ? et? OS ST. CoLIboN,INIUkYI Tt2R .r tvo. 9Zs2c. m.g. 1010-4-11. • • AC -T . TR PcC-1— ND. comb °tatisii 0 0 • • • 141. a • ?_s 77-o ,e'32-16.3 tri.B. S13 -12 • RR ' rn 1:1'rn • 152 -4t - ht -7 j 4 • • BL: 4 II •.,•.10..,, 9 8 .41 J 82.81 6 33 5 .13z0./.• .%; .4/20,,,• ,,,,,,, 4/ . -991,8 ?.. 4. /4,02..:4 344 ,,,, ••• • .1 ‘ . • . • • • 7424 33 23.92 42 • 6.05 7230 R.34.1 c"...\ 2' ID 10 20 R.50 „ 53 050 6.6035..42 ST 46 ZS 81 4,1":" s)C e 92 SA 44 I < 0 U 4.04,14. 12 4 sea, 13 9 15 16 U 0 0 aJ 40 Cr)U) hi 0 0 CX za, 4310.A.. 1.1 1533 48 0 20 •/, 46.3' 46 3/ AB 51 I— U 18 •°-' 4.28.0.[4.‘ea 17 _J _J j76 .10 z 1.7 —J 39. 5 .23 U I U BO U Li a - Cr Ca a8. Al 1 1 i •• ©• CODE 434p i 24TH 23 I 15 0 01 UI 2529 25 25.28 125 �18 ?529 25 24TH .14 13`• I 25 /2 19 \'1/420 • 2` /25 /23 BL 21 MoNTMPR1 M. B. G-1'55• N7`' ;�+f 25 11 25 K. 22 4:5 10 r. PL. ' v 8 k\ 1 ., 9O y_ 7A 6 Pa - 2 23 /6 0 24 25 5 Pot . 4 Po, 1 3 Por 90 +6 94 9 4. S.P.A4 0 90 0 • DE 140 MONTMARIE M. B. 9-135 I PEW. ASSMT. SEE: 160 — 25 tia HERMOSA VIEW TRACT NO. I M. B. 10 -39 CONDOMINIUM TRACT. NO. 38200 M. B. 970 - 73-74 etio302/."? 139//22oeoc.,... AssESSok1::, COUNTY OF 1OS AH(II ,F The asiessment of units in the follow;ng Condominium Plans, incluoes alt rights and interests n the common areas as set crth in deeds of recon o. Common At ca Condominium Plan Reference tract No. 81 k. LolS WI Lb Subdivision of Airspace ?5310 6-28-76 31815 1 $t, 2 d3 990• Poe. /// • /28.12 -•••••"" , DAY‘f KAI. • Ho6r 86,489°' 16 pop 5./J c ASSAM SEE: 160-13 • 2.0 crs • pa' kr) ole /es it /1/ tfl ag• 64.06 1 / 7 /7: 6'4°6 -:.,;;:44,aii,i4r11.4-X10411.4c.,r-,1';1.4i;gak. • .3,14 .• ., •Pi.•••01e't•:VI fir .• (4. 44S. : • ;44, ; , • 41 /60.11 0 3/1.4:J 44.72 0:1 ....401088. g. 5961° \8° /00 • SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH M.B. 3-11-12 6 /e9 1 1 1 64-96 6,4 06 /28-18 ,1. 2 779 Ac ° 003 bk. <st) 2.749 iAc. ts1 150.0e • CONDOMINIUM •100 Il/It „ •- \ Par' 0 61117 624 /GO TBACT. NO. 3 I q1 5 M. B. 863 - 74 •-• 75 PARCEL MAP PM. 53-46 •182•12 .r• 1824 C S• • At 52 • T•• 52 5-10•65 11-10-65- fi...10 82°5,N/016-9, 11. 76/1 800. 8107/. 8917‘,'.9 A , , rE \ • gpv.P'd'' -r i ' ...t.• /6 I Si 5.(2. .30 \10 90 0 • ia ..% • s .; tz °At ...---- It.i\Pi' .... Itt ...••••11$ _.......... . 1. ii• /0.,.,'.1.4.1. • 1 5R, 8101." • , \ \ .. ., ... . 1 \ 1..- por. • ..-1 \ ' i ....-- t'4, \ • 0 \, ... ....."-- Va --- r V.f,1 --- si. .2;\ 0 •.- 1 \ _..............\.A.4 , ..-- iv..16 --. --- \--.•-•,..-17/6. I . 2.38! Ae. 9 •0 z 145r4. "11 76 • 30 4. • •.,v3 •• • 50 firs SOO t ‘6 546.51:- 13' 6 0 8, VI,700.te 0 sa • 4,2.85 . • • 501 • • • •-s, • .•." • s, 528'4' 5.P.A • 1 33 it 1-1-1V5 1)6'.1e I In 201 •-• Thicr# 42.05 •• •• •• M.B. I 33- zq Econ, ADDITIoKi To HERrno5p BE A c..11 In. B. SOBbi vistorJ OF PART THE ..snirsAL. GD01460 R17-v&st t— .(f) 4 0 90 s,. Irels;k, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89-.15270 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE LAND .USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO ELIMINATE THE LAND USE CATEGORY OF MULTI -USE CORRIDOR AND CREATE A LAND USE CATEGORY OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR AND TO ADOPT A STATEMENT OF POLICIES FOR THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on March 21, 1989 and made the following Findings: A. The land use category of Multi -Use Corridor, established in 1966, is no longer an appropriate landuse designation for the Pacific Coast Highway commercial cdrridor as it does not clearly convey the City's goals and objectives for development along the corridor; B. Creation of the land use category of Commercial Corridor as a designation for the Pacific Coast Highway commercial corridor is an appropriate designation as it more clearly conveys a commitment to commercial development along Pacific Coast Highway; C. The designation of Commercial Corridor will be applied to a more focused area along the east and west side of Pacific Coast Highway than the Multi -Use Corridor..designation to recognize more realistically the the limits of the depth of commercial development acceptable to the citizens of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby amendthe Text of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to eliminate the Land Use category of "Multi -Use Corridor" and create the Land Use category of "Commercial Corridor" and the following text shall be added to the. Land Use Element of the General Plan: Commercial Corridor The purpose of this land use category is to clearly define the limits of the depth of commercial development along Pacific Coast Highway and prohibit the 4 6 9 10 11 12- 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (' c,SOLUTION NO. 89-5270 � development of new residential uses within the area with exceptions for vacant property not fronting on Pacific Coast Highway. Existing residential uses within the corridor are expressly allowed and can be improved, expanded and rebuilt to the same density, however, the transition of these uses to commercial usage is highly desirable. This category allows various types of commercial land uses including retail, service, and office uses. Automotive related commercial uses would be allowed by conditional use permit only. To ensure that commercial development will be compatible with existing nearby residential uses standards for building height, parking and access, setbacks, and landscaping will be implemented through Specific Plan Area designations Policies: 1) Existing structures used for residential purposes on a lot or parcel which is exclusively used for residential purposes are permitted to remain indefinitely, and shall be considered conforming uses, allowing said structure to be improved, rebuilt, or expanded, as long as the existing residential density is not increased. 2) Residentially developed and vacant property can only be used for commercial purposes if the property fronts on Pacific Coast Highway or is part of an assemblage of properties containing a commercial project which fronts on Pacific Coast Highway. 3) New residential projects shall be prohibited, except in the following cases: a) on currently vacant lots or parcels of land which do not front on Pacific coast Highway and which are not currently connected by ownership to lots fronting on Pacific Coast Highway and which will be developed to a density consistent with surrounding residential densities allowed by the General Plan, subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission; and, b) the improvement, expansion, or reconstruction of current _ residential structures which does not increase the current residential density (number of dwelling units) of the lot or parcel of land and said improvement, expansion, or reconstruction must conform to the zoning standards. 4) Height limits and the method of measurement shall be established which will minimize impacts of commercial development on scenic views and on the privacy of adjacent residences. 5) Landscaping requirements shall be established to improve the attractiveness of development along Pacific Coast Highway and to buffer interfacing or abutting residential development. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 \ 1 RESOLUTION NO,. ! ' �. 710 6) Traffic impact studies shall be required for projects which will cause significant traffic impacts and these studies shall include pvoposed measures to mitigate the impacts. 7) All new commercial projects shall require Planning Commission Review to ensure compliance with the standards and policies of .the Specific Plan Area, subject to City Council Appeal.-'` 8) A list of permitted uses shall be, , established which permits a broad range of commercial; and office related uses with emphasis given to uses which have the highest benefit to the community. 9) More than one SPA zone may be created for areas of the corridor based on the sub -area's unique features. 10) Orientation of all commercial development should be toward P.C.H. and not toward local_ residential streets. 11) Physical setbacks, and architectural treatment shall be provided where commercial and residential development abut, or interface 12) Assembled lots proposed for commercial developmet shall be merged as a condition of development. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 9th day of May 19 P/ SIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of ermosa Beach, California. TY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING• OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California held on Wednesday, May 3, 1989, at the hour of 7:32 P.M. 'OLL CALL P -sent: Absen : PLEDGE Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams None ALLEGIANCE - Mayor Williams The followi•g matters were continued to this date frothe regu-' lar meeting • April 25, 1989: PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. GENERAL P •N AMENDMENTS: Memorandum %rom Planning Director M'chael Schubach dated April 17, 19 C. SUGGESTED PROCESS TO RESOLVE GE`ERAL PLAN DESIGNATION FOR AREA 10, LOCATION GENERALBY FROM THE CITY LIMIT TO. THE SOUTH BETWEEN BLARNEY COUl{T AND MEYER COURT, AND REAR OF LOTS FRONTING ON SECOND TREET TO THE NORTH. Memo- randum from Planning D:r- tor Michael Schubach dated May 1, 1989. Supplmental 1= ter from Hermosa Hills Communi- ty Watch dated May 3, Councilmember Crei• ton decl-. ed an apparent conflict of interest due to o ing propert within 300 feet. A staff report as presented by " rector Schubach. Proposed Act on: To set Public Hear ng for zone change considerat'on as soon as possible. Motion W. liams, second Simpson. Secon., was withdrawn; with th clear understanding that this d riot in any wayi icate that she is supporting changi'. the General Plano a higher density. A± tion: To set for Public Hearing with the till d uarter General Plan Amendments including potent .1 zone change. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. AYES - Rosenberger; Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams NOES - None ABSTAIN - Creighton F. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO CONSIDER THE LOCATION AND POLICIES REGARDING MULTI -USE CORRIDOR AND TO CONSIDER A SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AND TO ADOPT THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEGA- TIVE DECLARATION, with resolution for adoption. Sup- plemental letters from: Roberta Farrell -Rudy- 732 -24th Street dated May 2 and petition with appx. 100 signa- tures opposing changing residential to commercial. — �- Minutes 5-3-89 A A staff report was presented1by Director:Schubach, and Advanced Planner Ken Robertson.• The Public Hearing was opened., Addressing the Council on the South East Area were: Debbie Lou - 843- 3rd St Wilma Burt - 1152- 7th St Addressing the Council on the North East Area were: Mike Lipscom - 845- 14th Street Rick Thompson - Hope Chapel 2420 Pacific Coast Hwy Betty Thomas - 1934 Pacific Coast Hwy Gerry Compton - 200 Pier Ave #9 Dorothy Zammit - 1918 Pacific Coast Hwy Karen Higgins - 821- 18th St Jack Andren - 521- Gentry Rainer Lorch - 2006 Rhodes Charles Abraham - 830 -18th St Councilmember Simpson declared an apparant conflict of interest in the North West Area due to owning property within 300 feet. Addressing the Council on the North West Area were: Franklin Lawson - 728- 24th St Jim Fucile - ownes property on 21st St Penny Smith - 724- 24th St William Fifer - 720- 24th St Virgil Daggi - owns lots 23 & 24 on 21st St Jerry Compton - 200 Pier Ave # 9 Larry Rooney - 732- 24th St Carol Lawson - 728- 24th St Scott Sargent - 2008 Rhodes Barbara Adams - 740- 24th St Addressing the Council on the South' West Area were: Betty Ryan - 588 -20th St - questions re: 715- 1st St Richard Bauman - 701- 4th St - represents Homeowners Assn. of 8 members Robert Kaufman - 750- 2nd St - submitted photos for review Carolyn Colby - 719- 1st P1 Jan McHugh - 718- 1st P1 Maxine Barton-Bouten - 701- 4th St John McHugh - 718- 1st P1 - submitted petition with 70 signatures opposing changing residential to commercial Sean Guthrie -710- 4th St - submitted petition with 13 signatures supporting General Plan High Density Jerry Compton - 200 Pier Avenue #9 Jim Shaw - 711- 1st P1 - submitted letter requesting that area remain residential Minutes 5-3-89 • ` The Public Hearing was closed. A recess was called, at 10:07 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 10:24 P.M. Action: To address this item quadrant by quadrant. Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon. So ordered, noting the objection of Williams. Straw Vote: To accept staff's and Planning.Commission's recommendations on the South East Quardrant. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. Proposed Amendment: To eliminate lot 42 & 43. Motion Williams, second Rosenberger. The second was withdrawn. Vote on above Straw Vote: AYES - Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson NOES - Creighton, Mayor Williams Action: To take the North East Area block by block. Motion Sheldon, second Williams. So ordered. 14th Street to 15th Street Straw Vote: To approve staff recommendation. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams NOES - None 15th Street to 16th Street Straw Vote:. Planning Commission recommendation to Low Density south of 15th Place, rest Planning Commission and staff recommendation. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson NOES - Mayor Williams 16th Street to 17th Street Straw Vote: To approve staff recommendation. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered. Action: To take 17th St to 21st St in one group. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. Proposed Straw Vote: To approve staff recommendation. Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon. AYES — Rosenberger, Sheldon NOES — Creighton, Simpson, Mayor Williams Further Proposed Straw Vote: 18th Street to 21st St - General Plan changed to Medium Density Residential. Motion Williams dies for lack of second. Minutes 5-3-89 i 17th Street to 18th Street Straw Vote: To approve staff recommendation. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger', Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams NOES - None Proposed Straw Vote: 18th Street to 19th St - General Plan designation Medium Density. Motion Williams - dies for lack of second. 18th Street to 19th Street Straw Vote: To approve staff recommendation. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. AYES - Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson NOES - Creighton, Mayor Williams • Proposed Straw Vote: 19th Street to 20th St - General Plan designation to Medium Density. Motion Williams, second Creighton. AYES - Creighton, Mayor Williams NOES - Rosenberger, Simpson, Sh'elon 19th Street to 20th Street Straw Vote: To approve staff recommendation. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. AYES - Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson NOES - Creighton, Mayor Williams 20th Street to 21st Street Straw Vote: General Plan Designation Medium Density. Motion Creighton, second Williams. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, Mayor Williams NOES - Rosenberger 21st Street to 24th Street Straw Vote: To approve staff recommendation. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered:. Councilmember Simpson stated that she would abstain from the North West Area due to abstaining during the Public Hearing. Action: To take the North West Quadrant a block at a time. Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting the abstention of Simpson. 24th Street to 24th Place Straw Vote: To approve staff recommendation. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting the abstention of Simpson. 21st Street to 24th Street Straw Vote: Lots 24 and 23 remain out of corridor. w7— Minutes 5-3-89 Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered, noting • the abstention of Simpson. Further Straw Vote: Remove 22, 21, and 20 from.Commer- cial Corridor. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered, noting the objection of Rosenberger and abstention of Simpson. Proposed Further Straw Vote: Lots 24; 23, 22, 21 and 20 redesignate Medium Density Residential (18 d.u. per acre). Motion Sheldon - withdrawn. Proposed Further Straw Vote: To make these five lots Medium Density Residential. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon NOES - Rosenberger, Mayor Williams ABSTAIN - Simpson (Councilmember Sheldon requested that' the record reflect that as a product of this motion the intent of the maker is to create an SPA and reduce dwelling units per acre.) Proposed Further Straw Vote: The area between 24th Street.and 21st Street on the Westside of the Highway have the corridor boundaries drawn at the back of the lots; at the Westerly extreme of the lots; abutting the Highway. Motion Creighton, second Wiliams. AYES - Creighton, Williams. NOES - Rosenberger, Sheldon ABSTAIN - Simpson Proposed Further Straw Vote: To change the General Plan Designation on lots facing 24th Street; lots 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, and 5 and lots facing 21st Street; 24, 23, 22, 21, and 20 as Low Density. Motion Williams - dies for lack of second. A recess was called at 11:55 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 12:05 P.M. Further Straw Vote: To leave the area between 24th Street and 21st Street rest. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered, noting the abstention of Simpson. 21st Street to 16th Street Straw,Vote: -To approve_ staff recommendation on Lots 13 and 14. Motion Creighton, second Williams. So ordered, noting the abstention of Simpson. Minutes 5-3-89 Further Straw Vote: To approve staff recommendation on Lots 15 through 22. Motion Sheldon, second Williams. So ordered, noting the. objection of Rosenberger and abstention of Simpson. 16th Street to Pier Avenue N Straw Vote: To approve staff recommendation. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. So ordered, noting the abstention of Simpson. , Councilmember Simpson returned to the dais for` `,the South West Area. Action: To do this South West Area block by block. Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon. So'ordered. 8th Street to 6th Street Straw Vote: To approve staff recommendation. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. AYES - Creighton, Rosenberger, Sheldon, Simpson,' Mayor Williams NOES - None Further Straw Vote: To approve staff recommendation of Medium Density on 5 lots south side of 8th Street. -Motion Creighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. 6th Street to 5th Street Straw Vote: To approve staff recommendation. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Proposed Further Action: To put the remainder of the area not decided tonight off until the next quarterly amendment of the General Plan. Motion Creighton - dies for lack of second. Final Action: To postpone discussion of 5th.Street south until next meeting. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. 24th Street to 21st Street Councilmember Simpson left the dais due to the previous- ly mentioned conflict on this area. Proposed Straw Vote: To designate Medium Density and to design developiment consistend with recently approved large tracts - 18 d.u. per acre and no more than 30 to 40% lot coverage. Motion Sheldon - dies for lack of second. Straw Vote: Lots 22, 21, and 20 be zoned Medium Density Residential; and 23 and 24 be *zoned Low Density Residen- tial R -1A. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Mayor Williams NOES - Rosenberger Minutes 5-3-89 ABSTAIN - Simpson (Councilmember Sheldon requested that the record show that the motion would entail his clear feeling that the two lots; 23 and 24; should be the higher zoned low den- sity designation called R -1A.) (Councilmember Rosenberger requested that the record show that he is voting no because he consistently en- ocurages commercial development for those lots.) Further Straw Vote: That the lots fronting the highway between 24th Street and 21st Street be in the Commercial Corridor. Motion Creighton, -second Williams. So ordered, noting the objection of Rosenberger and abstention of Simpson. Final Straw Vote: To approve staff recommendation on Lots 5 through 12 on 24th Street. Motion Rosenberger, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the abstention of Simpson. CLOSED SESSION To Declare that the need to have a Closed Session for Perso Inte 'm City Attorney arose after the posting of the agen to adjrn for that purpose. Motion C -ighton, second Rosenberger. So ordered. nel: ; and The Adjourne• Regular Meeting of the City Council adjourned at the hour.of 12. 5 A.M. on May 4 for the purpose %f a Closed Session. The meeting reconven-d at 12:55 A.M; with Closed Session. A. B. announcements from GENERAL PLAN RED IGNATION AN ZONE CHANGE FROM MEDIUM DENSITY, R-2, TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL, C-3, OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED"4PPROPRIATE BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR LOT 4, BLOCK 1, TRACT 15851 AND THE PRECISE PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DRIVEHRU RESTAURANT AT 1107. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND ENViIROTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION, with resolution for adoption .nd ordinance for waiver of further reading a d introductie (Straw vote at l}/25/89 meeting - 5-0.) This item wap"continued to May 9, 1 GENERAL PLAN REDESIGNATION FROM LOW DEN TY TO HIGH DEN- SITY AND/ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AREA 6, WEST SIDE OF PROSPECT AVENUE, APPROX. 220 FSOUTH OF ARTESIA BLVD., with resolution for adoption. (Straw,vote at 4/25/89 meeting - 5-0.) This item was continued to May 9, 1989. Minutes 5-3-89 TO: HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION RE: COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR RE -ZONING, NORTHEAST PORTION DEAR COMMISSIONERS: 0 1990 WE, THE RESIDENTS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE NORTHEAST PORTION OF THE COMMER- CIAL CORRIDOR, HEREBY PROTEST THE FORCING OF COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO OUR OVERWHELMINGLY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. FOR OVER 20 YEARS THE' CITY HAS EN- COURAGED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, BY PLACING A "COMMERCIAL POTENTIAL" DESIGNATION OVER THE RESIDENTIALLY -ZONED LOTS ALONG P.C.H. SIG- NIFICANTLY, NO NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT HAS OCCURRED BETWEEN 18TH AND 21ST STREETS IN THOSE 20 YEARS!! NOW THE NEW GENERAL PLAN PROPOSES. TO FORCE COM- MERCIAL ZONING (C-3) INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ALONG P.C.H.. WE NEITHER WANT NOR NEED THIS COMMERCIAL INTRUSION. THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF THIS CITY AND OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS DUE TO ITS RESIDENTIAL FEATURES, NOT ITS COMMERCIAL STRIPS. THEREFORE, WE STRONGLY URGE YOU TO RETAIN THE R-3 RESIDENTIAL ZONING THAT HAS SERVED US WELL. SIGNED: -a___ .x.23 .R7Ic4 6345- i? C. rl.) N 4 . 4??)/70 • • - AZ 0 dy.._,c,e 0 3.- 6 4V/ • -3/D-6/9d but-.... C� ��- � � %=�i 7/o Pcii 340/9a lc i S,c-i> P.( 40 i .3 — "to -cio r r l 1(2-16(?,(- (--1 3 ?L., 0 ,( A I650 (0 31140 /./Y /°c/--71 V20/90 . " MARCH, 1990 TO: iERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION RE: COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR RE -ZONING, NORTHEAST PORTION DEAR COMMISSIONERS: WE, THE RESIDENTS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE NORTHEAST`PORTION OF THE COMMER- CIAL CORRIDOR, HEREBY PROTEST THE FORCING OF CCMA4ERCIAL EXPANSION INTO OUR OVERWHELMINGLY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. FOR OVER 20 YEARS THE CITY HAS EN- COURAGED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, BY PLACING A "COOERCIAL POTENTIAL" DESIGNATION OVER THE RESIDENTIALLY -ZONED LOTS ALONG P.C.M., SIG- NIFICANTLY, NO NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT HAS OCCURREDBETWEEN 18TH AND 21ST STREETS IN THOSE 20 YEARS!! NOW THE NEW GENERAL PLAN PROPOSES TO FORCE COM- MERCIAL ZONING (C-3) INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ALONG P.C.H. WE NEITHER WANT NOR NEED THIS COMMERCIAL INTRUSION. THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF THIS CITY AND OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS DUE TO ITS RESIDENTIAL FEATURES, NOT ITS CCM4ERCIAL STRIPS. THEREFORE, WE STRONGLY URGE YOU TO RETAIN THE R-3 RESIDENTIAL ZONING THAT HAS SERVED US WELL, A0-• T0: HERMO.SA BEACH PLANNING CMOMISSION RE: COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR RE -ZONING, NORTHEAST PORTION DEAR COMMISSIONERS: WE, THE RESIDENTS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE NORTHEAST POR'T'ION OF THE COMMER- CIAL CORRIDOR, HEREBY PROTEST THE FORCING OF COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO OUR OVEMEELPEMIGLY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. FOR OVER 20 YEARS THE CITY HAS EN- COURAGED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, BY PLACING A "COMMERCIAL POTENTIAL" DESIGNATION OVER THE RESIDENTIALLY -ZONED LOTS. ALONG P.C.H. SIG- NIFICANTLY, IG-NIFICAN LY, NO NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT HAS OCCURRED BETWEEN 18TH AND 21ST STREETS IN THOSE 20 YEARS!! NOW THE NEW GENERAL PLAN PROPOSES 210 FORCE COM- MERCIAL ZONING (C-3) IN1t0 OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ALONG P.C.H. WE NEITHER WANT NOR NEED THIS COMMERCIAL INTRUSION. THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF THIS CITY AND OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS DUE TO ITS RESIDENTIAL FEATURES, NOT ITS COMMERCIAL STRIPS. THEREFORE, WE STRONGLY URGE YOU TO RETAIN THE R-3 RESIDENTIAL ZONING THAT HAS SERVED US WELL. SIGNED: 444 go/ B ielt4e {F/3 902,.�f se/(s /q_r_b` 577 fJ3. 9das'/ MARCH, 1990 T0: HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING CONM4ISSION RE: COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR RE -ZONING, NORTHEAST • PORTION DEAR COMMISSIONERS: WE, THE RESIDENTS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE NORTHEAST PORTION OF THE COMMER- CIAL CORRIDOR, HEREBY PROTEST THE FORCING OF COMMERCIAL EXPAUSION INTO OUR OVERWHELMINGLY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. FOR OVER 20 YEARS THE CITY HAS EN- COURAGED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, BY PLACING A "COMMERCIAL POTENTIAL". DESIGNATION OVER THE RESIDENTIALLY -ZONED LOTS ALONG P.C.H. SIG- NIFICANTLY, NO NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT HAS OCCURRED BETWEEN 18TH AND 21ST STREETS IN THOSE 20 YEARS!! NOW THE NEW GENERAL PLAN PROPOSES TO FORCE COM- MERCIAL ZONING (C-3) INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ALONG P.C.H. WE NEITHER WANT NOR NEED THIS COMMERCIAL INTRUSION. THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF THIS CITY AND OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS DUE TO ITS RESIDENTIAL FEATURES, NOT ITS COMMERCIAL STRIPS. THEREFORE, WE STRONGLY. URGE YOU TO RETAIN THE R-3 RESIDENTIAL ZONING THAT HAS SERVED US WELL. SIGNED: g � a w l qu6 -emr,(41 9 v 2, s tiLk deutic_ ea,,1 Ig(a(0 RAreeo %,"_5-4/ �� is .6/J'r 54324"e -- 10; e2(0 /'GAsdn 57; cOL� �f �f 9. 1r4 efAfiee 6 f / g ,)2 /78 /F.37iPs f�-B 9o�y� • MARCH, 1990 TO: HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION RE: COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR RE -ZONING, NORTfTEAST POWTION DEAR COMMISSIONERS: WE, THE RESIDENTS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE NORTHEAST PORTION OF THE COMMER- CIAL CORRIDOR, HEREBY PROTEST THE FORCING OF COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO OUR OVERWHELMMLY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. FOR. OVER 20 YEARS THE CITY HAS EN- COURAGED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, BY PLACING A "OaMMERCIAL POTENTIAL" DESIGNATION OVER THE RESIDENTIALLY -ZONED LOTS ALONG P.C.H. SIG- NIFICANTLY, NO NEW COMMRCIAL DEVELOPMENT HAS OCCURRED BETWEEN 18TH AND 21ST STREETS IN THOSE 20 YEARS!! NOW THE NEW GENERAL PLAN PROPOSES TO FORCE COM- MERCIAL ZONING (C-3) INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ALONG P.C.H. WE NEITHER WANT NOR NEED THIS OOMMERCIAL INTRUSION. THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF THIS CITY AND OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS DUE TO ITS RESIDENTIAL FEATURES, NQ T ITS COMMERCIAL STRIPS. THEREFORE, WE STRONGLY URGE YOU TO RETAIN THE R-3 RESIDENTIAL ZONING THAT HAS SERVED US WELL. SIGNED: (9. )1 td.e<', 2 L• 5.. • ig-51 /977/ 57 - pi 19v (rmc rg(s 2ooG 00-6 T0: HEZMOSA BE1Cii PLANNING COMMISSION RE: CO1MEERCIAL)9RRIDOR RE -ZONING, NORTHEAST PORTION DEAR COMMISSIONERS: J: WE, THE RESIDENT CIAL CORRIDOR, OVERWHELMINGLY COURAGED C POTENTIAL".DESr NIFICANTLY, NO STREETS IN THOS MERCIAL ZONING NEED THIS C NEIGHBORHOOD IS,. THEREFORE, WE S HAS SERVED US SIGNED: IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE NORTHEAST PORTION OF THE COMM R - Y PROTEST THE FORCING OF COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO OUR IDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. FOR OVER 20 YEARS THE CITY HAS EN - DEVELOPMENT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, BY PLACING A "COMMERCIAL TION OVER THE RESIDENTIALLY -ZONED LOTS ALONG P.C.H. SIG - r' COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT HAS OCCURRED BETWEEN 18TH AND 21ST 20 YEARS!! NOW THE NEW GENERAL PLAN PROPOSES TO FORCE COM- -3) INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ALONG P.C.H. WE NEITHER 4ANT NOR TAL INTRUSION. THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF THIS CITY AND OF OUR 'UE TO ITS RESIDENTIAL FEATURES, NOT ITS COMMERCIAL STRIPS. ONGLY URGE. YOU TO RETAIN THE R-3 RESIDENTIAL ZONING THAT 1 .� eta. c/ y P00,601/7 3. ✓ LE4-74-e- 2e/y.c//,-)--,.3:/9./ v c21/eT- - S'1 goy l`b11a 1.6 /YO-Wai Pe!? Ig‘•o Pct' ��-- TO: HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION RE: COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR RE -ZONING, NORTHEAST PORTION DEAR COMMISSIONERS: WE, THE RESIDENTS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE NORTHEAST PORTION OF THE COMMER- CIAL CORRIDOR, HEREBY PRC7T'EST THE FORCING OF COMMERCIAL EXPANSION INTO OUR OVERWHELMINGLY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. FOR OVER 20 YEARS THE CITY HAS EN- COURAGED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, BY PLACING A "CC MERCIAL POTENTIAL" DESIGNATION OVER THE RESIDENTIALLY -ZONED LCIS ALONG P.C.H. SIG- NIFICANTLY, NO NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT HAS OCCURRED BEIWEEN.18TH AND 21ST STREETS IN THOSE 20 YEARS!! NOW THE NEW GENERAL PLAN PROPOSES TO FORCE COM- MERCIAL ZONING (C-3). INTO OUR NEIGHBORHCX)D ALONG P.C.H.• WE NEITHER WANT NOR NEED THIS COMMERCIAL INTRUSION. THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF THIS;CITY AND OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS DUE TO ITS RESIDENTIAL FEATURES, N01 ITS CCMMERCIAL STRIPS. THEREFORE, WE STRONGLY URGE YOU TO RETAIN THE R-3 RESIDENTIAL ZONING THAT HAS SERVED US WELL. SIGNED: 7i2;7,/,/77Y( a_- (2/1 fit;-ate_t i P4 0 pc ie v rc (( P,_ / 5 -17 -70 c, y, j'/}-wLy /r1L /-c j`L7 5-0 -id kga67614),r? 2 e-) fr( a-ak) 6/(e &./02-0/9 (561 L s �,-aid .312 eft' a (cous (J0.1L,. 111.E . (� 2/01 v/ 6) 0--)6( �,� ,VJG 0 A 1,fc/{/ gAsw ifom/twEG-,09E- / X� /94//.x//. &Ai/v/ss/o.,v, Gi ry o F 1-//'//os/f&A-cfj ///S r/94L E y '/ , //zXvios,1,& /9 C/1-�a,ac-/7 /eo,6ry_oz&/E,esViOT/.e/_- 41-7(44) / .e33/.tib 8 T,/9-/uwai - Co ,/SS/o.,(1 (9. / MCff /20, /M ,BC4 SE U/I1/1:gisZr� .� E/vD . T/fes Tff kiFs7 //T2 SID Zi(/7E,e ,' y ///(1,0r it�'J(97' .1 / 7 M/v/Fic./() i S 6& V/50) W �/ - i/za //,,9.8 To ./w/ G/ff1iU ES 5T7°Z Y/,v� //,/,n '2 zelfr T/fit ////rE/117— / 777E .�/f,i / Go/UT/T— G 777/7 /{—ozz_ar)//i E CET7©.,t'S /2/4/(/////v C-'/5/6.,() , // Q V.1 -(__- o /4ti7 /sem J E L E '7- (LW Tq qr ExcEEL y DF Tff. fii257 _ 77Ee 5-T;wo/ S) P ci & TY WW6X's s///4'G o _(KO/r6/y5v15/rc 7%20/_ a'p )7Q C7- 4g5(Y.3 0/.611-16/67/A (/Q4/,c s 5fogro ,5•10(i/ t , v/?'.3-�/av...--2 r�'.�/f/gj . 174/ /1414/ L2.4/%/A177 yqi 01 777 I, the undersic ed, do declare under penalty Of_perjury that I did on the .L da of L-' 70 deposit into the United States post office, first9class postage prepaid, a copy of the public notice attached as Exhibit "A" to each and every person.attached as Exhibit "B". I warrant that the persons named on Exhibit "B" are all the persons required by applicable law to receive the public notice attached as Exhibit "A". I understand and agree that it is my responsibility to` cause these public notices to be made in an ,accurate and timely fashion and agree to hold the City harmless against any liability whatsoever for any defect of said notice or:notices. In the event an action is instituted :in a court of com- petent jurisdiction which questions the legality of the public notices, then the City may in its exclusive discretion suspend all hearings or cause the cessation of any construction or of any use which was permitted as a result of a hearing which was held'in accordance with the public notice. In the event that the court declares the notice or noticing procedure to be effective, then the City may in its exclusive discretion revoke' any permits granted and cause any approvals given pursuant to those public notices to be declared null and void and I agree on .behalf of myself and my heirs, assigns or successors-in-intere: to hold the City harmless in connection therewith. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 1 have executed this declaration on this the ,�;--- day of (xf y.„-�.--f , 197) at Hermosa Beach, California. • Y /41(0g 4 -(10V-1 (name) (Srgnature) 0424 (Capacity) • State,'of California ) County of Los Angeles ) SS On th.s the day of 47z1,;(% , l9 �, before me, �C�/G_Qy�Cr the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared proved to me on the basis of satisfactor evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) /5 subscrib d to the within instrument and acknowledged that 5 e. executed it. WITNESS my hand and off' ial • OFFICIAL SEAL LAURICE M. DUKE Notary Pub(lc • California PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN • L A. -COUNTY My Comm. Exp. Mar. 12, 1991 seal. y Public April 19, 1990 City Council Meeting April 24, 1990 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 90-1026- "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS FOR ALL PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENTS, . AND FOR ALL PROPOSD RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS OF TWO DWELLING UNITS OR GREATER AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL 'NEGATIVE DECLARATION." "Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 90-1026, relating to the above subject." At the. meeting of April 10, 1990, this ordinance was re -introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Concur: Essertier, Midstokke, Wiemans Sheldon, Mayor Creighton None None Respectfully submitted, Kevin B. North raft, City Manager 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • ORDINANCE NO. 90-1026 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS FOR ALL PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENTS, AND FOR ALL PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS OF TWO DWELLING UNITS OR GREATER, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held Public Hearings on September 26, 1989 and and March 27, 1990 and made the following findings: 1. Discretionary review of projects is necessary to require environmental assessments for projects according to the California Environmental Quality Act (C.E.Q.A.) guidelines. 2. Examining projects on a case by case basis will improve the quality of each project, and make it more compatible with adjacent development. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby ordain that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Add the following to Article 14: DIVISION 3. PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Section 1430. Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of requiring Precise Development Plan review for development projects is to achieve a reasonable level of quality, compatibility, in harmony with the community's social, economic and environmental objectives, and to protect existing and potential developments, and uses on adjacent and surrounding property. Section 1431. Projects Requiring Review. In order to achieve the purpose of this Section, it is considered necessary to require that the use of land, and erection, construction or location of buildings or structures in any zone shall require submittal of plans for Planning Commission review, with the exception of single-family residences and remodels, or additions of less than 1,500 square feet in any zone except residential zones. 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 1432. Standards and Review Criteria. A. Standards. All development shall be in compliance with minimum standards of the zoning ordinance. On a case basis, the Planning Commission may impose standards above the minimums designated by the zoning ordinance to improve the quality of development and to mitigate any environmental impacts. B. General Criteria. In considering the Precise Development Plan for any development, the following criteria for granting or conditionally granting said permit shall be considered: 1. Distance from existing residential uses in relation_: to, negative effects. 2. The amount of existing or proposed off-street parking in relation to actual need. 3. The combination of uses proposed, as they relate to compatibility. 4. The relationship of the estimated generated traffic volume and the capacity and safety of streets serving the area. 5. The proposed exterior signs and decor, and the compatibility thereof with existing establishments in the area. 6. Building and driveway orientation in relation to sensitive . uses, e.g., residences and schools. 7. Noise, odor, dust and/or vibration that may be generated by the proposed use. 8. Impact of the proposed use to the city's infrastructure, and/or services. 9. Adequacy of mitigation measures to minimize environmental impacts in quantitative terms. 10. Other considerations that, in the judgment of the Planning Commission, are necessary to assure compatibility with the surrounding uses, and the city as a whole. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C. Criteria for denial. The proposed development would substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity or interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in such area, because of excessive dissimilarity or inappropriateness of design in relation to the surrounding vicinity, and there are no known conditions of approval which can be imposed that could resolve such problems. 2. The proposed development would have significant environmental adverse impacts which are not mitigable, and where the finding of overriding considerations cannot be made. Section 1435. Appeals. The decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by filing a written appeal within ten (10) days of the Planning Commission's decision. Section 1436. Compliance. A. An approved Plan shall be valid for a one (1) year period and, should development fail to commence within such time limitation and no extension is granted, shall become null and void. B. No person shall violate or fail to comply with any approved plan or any condition or provision thereof, nor shall a building permit be issued for any building or structure which would violate or fail to comply with an approved Plan. Section 1437. General Procedures. Application for Precise Development Plan review shall be filed and approval given prior to the issuance of building permits. An application shall consist of a detailed and fully dimensioned site plans, building plans, floor plans, architectural drawings and elevations, landscape plans and/or any other data found to be reasonably required Applications shall be submitted to the City Planning Department and shall be in compliance with the department's specific requirements. Fees shall be set by policy of the City Council. SECTION 2. Amend Article 20. PENALTY, to add the following underlined statements: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Sec. 20-3 Violation ofconditions ofconditional use permits "and precise development plans" No person shall violate any conditions of a conditional use permit or "precise development plan." Any person violating any of the said conditions shall be guilty of an infraction. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall not applyto any projects that have a completed building permit package on file with the City prior to March 27, 1990. Said package must include a completed building permit application form, completed conceptual plan (plot plan, floor plan, elevation plan and similar plans, and a lot survey). Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a diligent manner and must have been issued a building permit within six (6) months of the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 5. The City Council shall designate the City Attorney to prepare a summary of this ordinance to be published pursuant to Government Code Section 36933(c) (1) in lieu of the full text of said ordinance. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 24th day of April, 1990. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: plandoc/ccorpdp April 5, 1990 City Council Meeting April 10, 1990 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 90-1026 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF.HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS FOR ALL PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENTS, AND FOR ALL PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS OF TWO DWELLING UNITS OR GREATER, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION" Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 90-1026, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of March 27, 1990, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon NOES: Wiemans, Mayor Creighton ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Respectfully submitted, Elaine Doerfling,'City Clerk Concur: /-):,‘9%-1,11 Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager - 1 - 1 2 4 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 90-1026 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS FOR ALL PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENTS, AND FOR ALL PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS OF TWO DWELLING UNITS OR GREATER, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held Public Hearings on September 26, 1989 and and March 27, 1990 and made the following findings: 1. Discretionary review of projects is necessary to require environmental assessments for projects according to the California Environmental Quality Act (C.E.Q.A.) guidelines. 2. Examining projects on a case by case basis will improve the quality of each project, and make it more compatible with adjacent development. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby ordain that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Add the following to Article 14: DIVISION 3. PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Section 1430. Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of requiring Precise Development Plan review for development projects is to achieve a reasonable level of quality, compatibility, in harmony with . the community's social, economic and environmental objectives, and to protect existing and potential developments, and uses on adjacent and surrounding property. Section 1431. Projects Requiring Review. In order to achieve the purpose of this Section, it is considered necessary to require that the use of land, and erection, construction or location of buildings or structures inany zone shall require submittal of plans for Planning Commission review, with the exception of single-family residences and remodels, or additions of less than 1,500 square feet in any zone except residential zones. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 • 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 fi Section 1432. Standards and Review Criteria. A. Standards. All development shall be in compliance with minimum standards of the zoning ordinance. On a case basis, the Planning Commission may impose standards above the minimums designated by the zoning ordinance to improve the quality of development and to mitigate any environmental impacts. B. General Criteria. In considering the Precise Development Plan for any development, the following criteria for granting or conditionally granting said permit shall be considered: 1. Distance from existing residential uses in relation to negative effects. 2. The amount of existing or proposed off-street parking in relation to actual need. 3. The combination of uses proposed, as they relate to compatibility. 4. The relationship of the estimated generated traffic volume and the capacity and safety of streets serving the area. 5. The proposed exterior signs and decor, and the compatibility thereof with existing establishments in the area. 6. Building and driveway orientation in relation to sensitive uses, e.g., residences and schools. 7. Noise, odor, dust and/or vibration that may be generated by -the proposed use. 8. Impact of the proposed use to the city's infrastructure, and/or services. 9. Adequacy of mitigation measures to minimize environmental impacts in quantitative terms. 10. Other considerations that, in the judgment of the Planning Commission, are necessary to assure compatibility with the surrounding uses, and the city as a whole. 2 2 3 4 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Criteria for denial. 1. The proposed development would substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity or interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in such area, because of excessive dissimilarity or inappropriateness of design in relation to the surrounding vicinity, and there are no known conditions of approval which can be imposed that could resolve such problems. 2. The proposed development would have significant environmental adverse impacts which are not mitigable, and where the finding of overriding considerations cannot be made. Section 1435. Appeals. The decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by filing a written appeal within ten (10) days of the Planning Commission's decision. Section 1436. Compliance. A. An approved Plan shall be valid for a one (1) year period and, should development fail to commence within such time limitation and no extension is granted, shall become null and void. B. No person shall violate or fail to comply with any approved plan or any condition :or provision thereof, nor shalla building permit be issued for any building or structure which would violate or fail to comply with an approved Plan. - Section 1437. General Procedures. Application for Precise Development Plan.:: review shall be filed and approval given prior to the issuance of building permits. An application shall consist of a detailed and fully dimensioned site plans, building plans, floor plans, architectural drawings and elevations, landscape plans and/orany other data found to be reasonably required Applications shall be submitted to the City Planning Department and shall be in compliance with the department's specific requirements. Fees shall be set by policy of the City Council. SECTION ,2. Amend Article 20. PENALTY, to add the following underlined statements: Sec. 20-3 Violation of conditions of conditional use permits "and precise development plans" No person shall violate any conditions of a conditional use permit or "precise development plan." Any person violating any of the said conditions shall be guilty of an infraction. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a completed building permit package on file with the City prior to March 27, 1990. Said package must include a completed building permit application form, completed conceptual plan (plot plan, floor plan, elevation plan and similar plans, and a lot survey). Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a diligent manner and must have been issued a building permit within one (1) year of the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage .and adoption. SECTION 5. The City Council shall designate the City Attorney to prepare a summary of this ordinance to be published pursuant to Government Code Section 36933(c) (1) in lieu of the fulltext of said ordinance. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the.. City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of .the proceedings of the City Council at which the same •:is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1990. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTESTi APPROVED AS TO FORM: plandoc/ccorpdp CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 4 SVcqune (Ws. ECtfam 2065 GMan%attan ditunoia Bfacfi, C--:-.4 90254 3/22 '90 Mayor and Council City of Hermosa Beach pz- I C MAR 2 61990 Another stabbing by a "transient. Some time agoI r quested a police check occasionally of the Peir 5i7 ,,db pccu,Z6c' Ave. laundry4 I had observed transients that appeared sick or incoherent and with beer or wine.. However, right across from our. police station we have allowed the situation to continue. The homeless people sleeping onour beach, the Greenbelt Park and the laundry are now ignored by the City of Hermosa Beach. Are you aware of where these people are using bathroom facilities, obtaining medical treatment or food ? rWe have a policy of procedure for parking enforcement. We have no policy, no plans, no assistance of any kind for these unfortunate human beings. If we have only one or twenty, then that number does not seem like .an impossibility to find out what is needed. Recently, an Alzheimers victim was on the streets in Los Angeles for seven months before someone recognised him as a man the family had been searching for. Do we know if any of our street people are being searched for by family ? If the police depts. of our beach cities pick up a transient for a minor disturbance, I believe the practice is to drop them off at the next.cities border. This is a regional problem. It is time we opened our eyes and addressed the cities responsibility in this problem for protecting everyones health and safety, including the homeless. n I request the Council to provide a policy for action by the city and the police dept. Please include this letter on the agenda under "written communications". Thank you, 4b ` VVittiami 2065 4annattan �7vG dj, mosa !Brack£ 4 90254 April 7, 1990 Kevin Northcraft 47117 C41Ly LpV�C/(� City Manager, Hermosa Beach, CA Dear Kevin: In.your letter to me of April 2, you expressed dismay that I submitted what you called false information to the press. To the best of my information and experience on the City Council, what I wrote is factual. (In todays L.A.Times article on the homeless there is no mention of any Hermosa teach efforts in this area.) Since it is very difficult for a citizen to have a topic agendized for discussion, I went to the press. Well gosh, if we are taking care of homeless problems, I do owe the City an apology. I believe many of us would appreciate knowing who at City hall has that responsibility. If a homeless person wanted help, which Dept. would they contact ? Maybe Community Resources ? I am relieved to know Iermosa Beach is taking action with these people. I'm sure the public would like to know what we are doing. Last Friday, at noon, in the La Playita restaurant, I observed a police action (or non -action) which may be related to a homeless problem or to our police practice with "just plain drunks". Upon sitting at the counter I noticed an obviously intoxicated "older" man harrasing the employees through the take-out. window. The waitress volunteered to me that some officers were having lunch in the back and that she had told them about the problem. When the officers left, I could see one of them get into the patrol car which was parked on 14th. He' drove around the corner onto the Strand and with out getting out of the car spoke to the drunk through the open window. The man walked a few feet north. The patrol car left. The man turned and walked south. I wondered what the officer said to the man and why he didn't put him in the car. Whether this was a "transient" or just a drunk, it appeared our police practice is to do nothing. Sincerely, SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION A _b �t South Bay Free Clinic March 20, 1990 Mayor and City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 MAR 2 91990 Dear Mayor Creighton and City Councilmembers: On March 13, 1990 the Hermosa Beach City Council voted to eliminate the funding of non-profit programs from the Community Development Block Grant (C.D.B.G.) program. We, as current C.D.B.G. recipients, were unaware the City Council was planning to discuss the elimination of C.D.B.G. to non -profits organizations at this March 13, 1990 meeting. Moreover, we believe, after reviewing the council comments, that other funding for non-profit organizations in the City of Hermosa Beach budget is also in jeopardy. These decisions are of great concern to us. The South Bay Cities' contributions to community-based organizations is critical to providing a variety of services to South Bay families. The C.D.B.G. and city contributions are an integral part of the comprehensive budget package of each local agency. Any loss of funding effects a non-profit agency's entire budget and influences its ability to obtain funding from other sources. Because we did not know that C.D.B.G. funding and other non-profit funding were to be discussed at this meeting, we were unable to provide you testimony regarding the implications of your decision. We are requesting that we be given an opportunity Serving kids and families in the South Bay to speak either under the agenda item, "Written Communication( ,011 from the Public" or at a public hearing scheduled in the near? future. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely, SLC Carol Adelkoff Executive Directo 1736 Family Crisis Center Thomas F. Skinner Executive Director South Bay Free Clinic ulie Dorr-Feys Executive Director Project Touch Dan Smith Executive Director South Bay Juvenile Diversion Project 173 April 24, 1990. Ne(mosa Beach, CA 90254 273-379- \443..r‘ Redondo Administrative 3 W. TorranceMBlvd., Su`th te 101 Clinic: Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Mayor Creighton and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 20/2 Dear Mayor Creighton and Members of the City Council: Please accept this letter as formal testimony from the 1736 Family Crisis Center for tonight's meeting. The intent of our testimony is to sustain funding to the local non -profits not only through the City's General Fund, but also through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. Funding from the City of Hermosa Beach allows 1736 Family Crisis Center to provide critical services to both temporary and permanent residents of the City. On March 30, 1990., a letter was submitted to the Council detailing the high level of actual service that our Agency provides to abused children, families, and residents of Hermosa Beach. This service falls in areas of 24-hour emergency assistance, comprehensive counseling support, job training, a community-based Battered Women's Support Group, and emergency housing for runaway teens and battered women/children in two shelters located within the City of Hermosa Beach. A copy of this letter is attached for your reference. Together, the South Bay Free Clinic, South Bay Juvenile. Diversion, Project Touch, and 1736 Family Crisis Center are, in fact, providing extremely comprehensive service to local residents. We are caring for the counseling, housing, diversion,educational, medical, dental, and legal needs of hundreds of local children and adults. 1736 Family Crisis Center supports the efforts of these agencies as a team and strongly recommends that the Council reinstate the CDBG funding to these agencies. The reduction or elimination of funds negatively impacts each agency from a monetary as well from an image perspective. Stated simply, we are subject to demonstrating strong local support in order to generate other government and private sector grants. 1736 Family Crisis. Center wishes to apply 100% of the funds requested from the City of Hermosa Beach to direct client service costs. Administrative costs will be covered strictly through other funding sources. SUPPLEMENTAL. INFORMATION 4.a Copies are attached of our recent correspondence (dated January 15, 1990 and March 30, 1990), requesting $10,000.00 in CDBG funds and $11,500.00 in General Funds for fiscal year 1990-91. If you have any questions about this testimony or funding request, please do not hesitate to contact us at 213-372-4674. Thank you for your consideration of this important input from the leaders of the non-profit agencies in our community. sip erely, 4 Carol A. Adelkdf'f Executive Director 1736 Family Crisis Center Tow Beach, CA 90254 273-379_ 520 J... ~1\ Administrative Offices/Mental Health Clinic: 1'1 103 W. Torrance Boulevard, Suite 101 CSS Redondo Beach, California 90277 March 30, 1990 Mayor Creighton, and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center 1315. Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Dear Mayor Creighton and Members of the City Council: Please accept this correspondence as formal application by the 1736 Family Crisis Center for a continued grant through the City of Hermosa Beach General fund for the fiscal year 1990-91. For many years, the 1736 Family Crisis Center has received this assistance from the City of Hermosa Beach. The impact of City funds has been substantial, not only in actual dollars, but also in the important message which accompanies this gift of local support from our home city of 18 years. The staff of our Agency works -Closely and frequently with the City of Hermosa Beach Police Department to ensure the proper care and protection of individuals within our City. The relationship with the Hermosa Beach Police Department is very strong and operates on a mutual referral basis. The Hermosa police can attest to the tremendous cost saved each year in the Police Department by having, 1736 Family Crisis Center in the City. As one example, police officers in our City may -simply bring homeless minors to the 1736 House, where our staff will either handle the case or assist the police in doinz so. If our youth shelter is full-, our Agency can generally make alternative, legal housing and care arrangements for the child. This service by 1736 Family Crisis Center saves actual dollars for the Hermosa Beach Police Department reducing: 1) the number of hours spent by police in handling juvenile cases: 2) police overtime and overhead costs; 3) the cost of placing additional officers on duty while one is occupied making necessary arrangements for the kids (this generally takes several hours per child); and ) the cost of transporti^g youth substantial distances where the closest alternative sheltersare located. Funding from the City of Hermosa Beach is particularly important at this time in that we are experiencing cutbacks in County and State funds, due to shortage of government dollars. The following will set forth level and type of services rendered by the 1736 Family Crisis Center in the first eight months of the current fiscal year in tie City of Hermosa Beach: 79 Hermosa Beach residents were serviced in our nonresidential programs from July 1989 through February 1990. Of these, 14 received formal Outpatient Counseling Services; our Outpatient Program includes counseling to children, adults, couples, and families, as well as a community-based Battered Women's Support Group for women who may not have left a violent home, but who wish to receive peer support and information regarding matters of safety and personal survival. 18 Hermosa Beach residents received Emergency Walk -In services, which includes in-person emergency counseling, food, clothing, advocacy, and referrals. 47 Hermosa Beach residents received diverse 24 -Hour Hotline services, ranging from suicide intervention and emergency counseling, to referrals for substance abuse and other problems; to information about child abuse and other important personal and family matters 1736 Family Crisis Center operates two shelters in the City of Hermosa Beach, one for battered women and their children, the other for runaway.and homeless teens. The residents of these shelters have met all federal eligibility standards as temporary Hermosa Beach residents. There is no charge for service to the women and children. Shelter care may range in length from a couple of weeks (in the teen shelter) to a month (in the Emergency Battered Women's/Children's Shelter). Our .effort is to help each adult and pre -adult resident develop realistic survival options and plans for their future safety, off of the streets and apart from violent households, and to help each child overcome the devastating effects of abuse, homelessness; and trauma. From July 1989 through February 1990, 157 individuals received housing, food, counseling, crisis intervention care, and survival assistance services in our two Hermosa shelters. 21 of the residents in the Emergency Battered Women's Shelter were child abuse victims, ranging in age from infancy to adolescence; some of these children were physically abused, some sexually, some neglected, and most exposed to brutal violence between their parents. 91 of the residents were abused and "at risk" children staying in the Emergency Youth Shelter and ranging in age from 10 through 17; some of these youth were identified by local residents, churches, life guards, and law enforcement to be wandering in the C«; of Hermosa Beach from having run away and home to seek refuge at our beach. The $7,500 gift from the City of Hermosa Beach has been matched on a dol'_ar-fcr- dollar basis. Polaroid Corporation has provided $2,250 (this gift was original_ pledged and referenced in our first quarter report at $2,650; the $400 differer-ce has been made up through church and individual gifts). The balance of $5,250 has been provided by: Friends of 1736; Southern California Edison; Fritz 7.... Sons; Women of St. Cross; St. Cross Tuesday Night Live; individual donations: The current allocation to the 1736 Family Crisis Center does not cover the h4_^ cost of caring for all of the local residents who we serve. 'The 1736 Fami1-; Crisis Center respectfully reci?ests that its allocation be increased to Sil. :o for fiscal year 1990-91 44rom its current level of S7.500. The 1736 Family Crisis Center never closes its doors or turns away an individual in need. For 18 years, this has been our commitment which we are able to uphold only with the support of our local cities and community. Thank you for your support. Sir)ezrely, / Carol A. Adelkoff Executive Director 1736 Family 'Crisis Center cc: Mary C. Rooney 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 January 15, 1990 j v,er Ms. Andrea Anderson Planning Aide City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 a Bea ch CA 90254 273-379-362a/2 73.3793620/ 73_372 ,2 4674 Dear -Andrea:. Per your letter of December 26, 1989 (copy attached), this is to express the interest of the 1736 Family Crisis Center in receiving CDBG funding during the 1990-91 program year. The amount of this request for CDBG funds is $10,000. As you know, the CDBG grant for the current fiscal year in the amount of $2,544 provided partial funding for only three months of the fiscal year (July, August, and September). The $10,000 grant requested for the 1990-91 year would provide partial funding assistance for a full twelve months. 1736 Family Crisis Center proposes to again utilize the requested CDBG funds for Hermosa Beach shelter and support services. Current services of the 1736 Family Crisis Center are described in the attached document, "Overview of Services." At this time, the 1736 Family Crisis Center would also like to respectfully request a continuation in the 1990-91 fiscal year of our General Funds gift in the amount of $7,500. Thank you for your assistance, and please do not hesitate to call if I can provide any further information. Sincere Carol A. Adelkoff Executive Director 1736 Family Crisis Center April 16, 1990 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 24, 1990 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 90-1 LOCATION: CITYWIDE INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS TO ELIMINATE THE 17 -FOOT PARKING SETBACK REQUIREMENT ON ALLEYS Recommendation The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the zoning ordinance text be amended to eliminate the 17 -foot setback requirement for parking stalls on alleys. Staff also recommends that the amendment include a requirement of 4 parking spaces for single-family dwellings with 4 bedrooms or more, or with over 3000 square feet, and recommends the introduction of the attached ordinance. Background On December 12, 1989, the City Council directed staff to prepare an interim ordinance which would waive the 17 -foot setback requirement for garages if four (4) parking spaces are provided on site. This came about as a result of the discussion of the Variance request at 3133 The Strand. On January 9, 1990,. the City Council, instead of adopting a proposed interim ordinance, directed staff to prepare text amendments for consideration that would eliminate the 17 -foot parking setback requirement on alleys. At their meeting March 6, 1990, the Planning Commission recommended that the 17 -foot parking setback on alleys be eliminated, and voted not to include staff's recommendation to require four (4) parking spaces for single-family dwellings of fourbedrooms or more, or with over 3000 square feet gross floor area. Analysis Since many cities base the number of required parking spaces on the number of bedrooms, staff believes this approach should be used for large dwellings at least for the interim while the staff studies this matter more thoroughly via the Housing Element. By todays standards a large dwelling starts at about 3,000 square feet. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report for the analysis of the proposed amendment. 1 9 Clarification It should be noted that by definition in the zoning ordinance it is not clear whether the service road which runs parallel to Hermosa Avenue would be considered a street or alley. The zoning ordinance defines street as "a thoroughfare having a width of not less than twenty-one (21) feet, and dedicated to public use which affords primary means of access to abutting property." The Hermosa Avenue service road is part of the 100 foot. wide Hermosa Avenue street right-of-way, and therefore could be considered a street. It has been staff's intent to include this service drive for exclusion from the 17 -foot setback requirement. 'To make this clear, staff has included a provision in the ordinance which reads "For purposes of this section the service road parallel to Hermosa Avenue between 27th Street and 35th Street shall be considered an alley" CONCUR Michael Schubach Planning Director evin B. Norrthcraft City Manager Attachments 'Ken Robertson Associate Planner 1. Proposed ordinance. 2. P.C. resolution 90-13 3. P.C. minutes of 3/6/90 4. P.C. staff report 3/6/90 with attachments p/pcsrl7 ft. 2 3 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • ORDINANCE 90-1 i AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH; CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ELIMINATE THE 17 -FOOT PARKING REQUIREMENT ON ALLEYS 6-1-NOEE=FAMILY DWEL E-- AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 24, 1990 and to receive public testimony --regarding "Text Amendment 90-1, and made the following Findings: A. The 17 -foot garage setback from streets was established primarily to provide room to park a standard vehicle behind a garage that would not block the sidewalk; B. The 17 -foot garage setback was also applied to alleys so additional off-street parking would be provided in all cases; C. The 17 -foot setback on alleys requires that parking be located in a specified manner when other options maybe available which may allow for a floor plan of a better and more efficient design, and which would still provide adequate parking; D. The 17 -foot setback on alleys places an undue burden on small lots because it requires the use of at least 37 -feet of the depth to be used for parking purposes, and other options of providing the parking are available which would allow a more practical use of the ground floor; E. The 17 -foot setback on alleys should be an option available to developers toward providing parking, but should not be an absolute requirement for all cases. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby ordains the following amendments to the zoning ordinance text: SECTION 1. Amend Section 1157(C) to read as follows: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 \`: I In residential zoties,‘ gatages \or parking stalls fronting on a public street shall be set back a minimum of seventeen (17) feet from the property line if roll -up garage doors are installed, or set back twenty (20) feet if standard garage doors are installed.. Garages or parking stalls fronting on an alley ;shall provide one of the following setbacks from: the property line: seventeen (17). feet, nine (9) feet, or three (3) feet, except garages or parking stalls fronting on an alley of fifteen (15) ,feet in width or less need only to comply with :the` turning radius requirements of Section 1161. For purposes of this section the*'Service road located parallel to Hermosa Avenue between 27th Street and 35th Street shall be considered as an alley. SECTION 2. Amend Section 1158(B) by adding the underlined text to read as follows: Parking spaces, not within a building, shall comply with the parking lot design standards attached hereto, with the following exceptions: (1) In residential zones, guest parking spaces located in tandem behind a required parking space shall have a minimum length of seventeen (17) feet. (2) Guest parking spaces situated parallel .to alleys and located behind garage doors with a 9 -foot setback shall have a minimum length of twenty-two (22) feet. SECTION 3. Amend Section 1159 (B) to read as follows: In all residential zones, required _parking spaces including replacement of on -street parking may be tandem. In the R-1 zone only, tandem parking may be accessed directly from a public street.. Guest spaces in all residential zones may be located in garage setbacks of seventeen -feet or nine -feet as required in Section 1157(C) provided they comply with the dimensional requirements specified. in Section 1158. However, in no case may one guest space be located behind another guest space. SECT Amend Section 1151(A) by add' •- e underlined text read as follows: One-FamDwelling. Parking Requirement o off-street parking space •lus on guest space. one additional guest space . shall be 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 i2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 provided for dwellings with four (4) or more barooms or which exceed 000 square eet in gross floor area (excluding garage area SECTION /This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION .Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Eas Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation pu lishe and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances. of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1989. PRESIDENT—Trt e City Counci an MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY p/persl7 • .•4 1 3 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 line if roll -up garage doo1rs are installed, or set. back twenty (20) feet"if standard garage doors are installed. Garages or parking stalls fronting on an alley shall provide one of the following setbacks from the property line: seventeen (17) feet, nine (9) feet, or three (3) feet, except garages or parking stalls fronting on an alley of fifteen (15) feet in width or less need only to comply with the turning radius requirements of Section 1161. SECTION 2. Amend Section 1158(B) by adding the underlined text to read as follows: Parking spaces, not within a building, shall comply with the parking lot design standards attached hereto, with the following exceptions: (1) In residential zones, guest parkingspaces located in tandem behind a requireparking space shall have a minimum length of seventeen (17) feet. (2) Guest parking spaces situated parallel to alleys and located behind garage doors with a 9 -foot setback shall have a minimum length of twenty-two (22) feet.. SECTION 3. Amend Section 1159 (B) to read as follows: In all residential zones, required parking spaces including replacement of on -street parking may be tandem. In the R-1 zone only, tandem parking may be accessed directly from a.public street. Guest spaces in all residential zones may be located in garage setbacks of seventeen -feet or nine -feet as required in Section 1157.(C) provided they comply with the dimensional requirements specified in Section 1158. However,, in no case -may one guest space be located behind another guest space. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Ketz,Moore,Rue NOES: Comm.Peirce,Chmn.Ingell ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 90-13 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission o th- C. y of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meets g ► . 6, 1990.,,,„---1/ Sco ell ✓Chairman Michael Schu•ach, Secretary 1/ /-/3gZi) Date p/persl7 TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING SEVENTEEN -FOOT PARKING SETBACK AND CONSIDERATION OF ELIMINATION OF SETBACK REQUIREMENT FROM ALLEYS AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION (CONTINUED FROM MEETING OF FEBRUARY 20. 19901 Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated February 20, 1990. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the proposed resolution recommending adoption of the subject text amendment. At the meeting of December 12, 1989, the City Council directed staff to prepare an interim ordinance which would waive the 17 -foot setback requirement for garages if four parking P.C. Minutes 3/6/90 spaces are provided on site. This came about as a result of the discussion of a variance request at 3133 The Strand. At their meeting of January 9, 1990, the City Council, instead of adopting a proposed interim ordinance, directed staff to prepare text amendments for consideration that would eliminate the 17 -foot parking setback requirement on alleys. The 17 -foot setback requirement for garages was established in 1986 for the purpose of providing enough room behind garages in all zones to park a standard vehicle which would not block sidewalks and to provide additional off-street parking. The City Council when establishing this requirement modified the Planning Commission recommendation to allow setbacks on alleys to be either 17 feet, 8 feet, or 3 feet. Application of the 17 -foot setback has indeed accomplished the objectives of the Council. Many residential buildings have been constructed in conformance with the 17 -foot setback requirement, and in mostcases it has resulted in the provision of.more than the required parking. Therefore, when considering the elimination of the• 17 -foot setback requirement on alleys, it must be realised that it will likely result in less off-street parking in the future. Complaints and objections regarding the 17 -foot setback requirement have come primarily from owners of shallow single-family lots who are concerned about dedicating such a large portion of their ground -floor area to parking area. For example, lots with a 70 -foot depth after providing for the setback, the required garage depth, the front and rear setbacks, and the open space requirements are left with a maximum ground floor dimension of only 20 to 27 feet, limiting the potential uses of the ground floor. the situation is not much better for 80 -foot deep lots. It can also be argued that this concern applies to all residential lots where the options for the ground floor plan, perhaps unnecessarily, are being limited by the 17 -foot requirement on alleys. For many of the average -sized lots in the City, three or four parking spaces can easily be provided without the use of the 17 -foot setback. To address these concerns regarding the 17 -foot setback, staff has resurrected the original recommendation of the Planning Commission regarding this issue. The recommendation was to require one of the following setbacks for garages facing an alley: 17 feet, 8 feet, or 3 feet; and for projects on alleys of 15 feet or less the turxiing radius requirements of Section 1161 would apply. Staff is including a modification to this recommendation that the garage setback be either 3 feet, 9 feet, or 17 feet. Staff believes that the 9 -foot setback is necessary to provide the minimum dimension for a car parked parallel behind a garage. This space would qualify as a required guest space. Staff is also recommending dimensional standards for parallel parking of a minimum length of 22 feet to provide the necessary maneuvering space. To lessen the impact on parking, staff also included a provision that single-family houses containing four or more bedrooms, or more than 3000 square feet, be required to provide two guest spaces. In all other cases, however, projects will only have to meet the minimum parking requirements as established in the zoning ordinance Staff felt that the proposed amendments address the immediate concerns noted in a manner that does not sacrifice the integrity of existing parking and zoning requirements. Stats' also felt that these amendments may have an ancillary benefit of providing a greater incentive for developers trying to maximize floor space to use the alley for access rather than the street. - Comm. Ketz asked for clarification on the amount of area required for the turning radius off of an alley. Mr. Schubach explained that when a parking space is extended in width, there is greater maneuverability for vehicles backing out and turning around; therefore, the space behind it can be reduced. If there is a minimum size parking space, there would need to be a minimi of 23 feet behind the space in order for cars to back out. P.C. Minutes 3/6/90 Comm. Ketz noted that if three parking spaces are required on a lot of 30 by 70.feet with a ten - foot alley, a great portion of the lot would therefore be unbuildable. • Mr. Schubach disagreed, stating that if the 17 -foot setback requirement is removed, 23 feet of area would be required rather that the current requirements of even more area for the setback (17 feet), the garage (18 feet), and the additional 8 feet, fora current total of 43 feet. Mr. Schubach and Comm. Ketz discussed the required parking spaces and turnaround areas on various sized lots. Mr. Schubach noted that for quite some time staff has been -aware -of the problems with the 17 - foot setback and the fact that there should be exceptions, particularly, for lots on alleys of 10 feet and 15 feet. Mr. Schubach, in response to questions from Comm. Rue, explained the required lengths and widths for parking spaces. Mr. Schubach, in response to questions from Comm. Rue, stated that staff hopes the proposed provisions will encourage parking in the rear. Comm. Peirce asked how staff arrived at the figure of 3000 feet for the cutoff between requiring three parking spaces versus four parking spaces. Mr. Schubach explained that staff was directed to bring this matter back immediately. At this time, staff used a cutoff point of 3000 square feet since houses of that size are quite large. He noted, however, that staff intends to study this matter further when the housing element is addressed.. Comm. Ketz asked whether staff studied the parking requirements for other beach cities in terms of whether three or four spaces are required based on the size of the home. Mr. Schubach replied in the negative. He noted, however, that most other cities require more parking than Hermosa Beach. He continued by explaining that most other (non -beach) cities have fifty -foot lots and very wide streets which can accommodate more on -street parking. Unfortunately, this City does not have the luxury of lower density and wider streets thereby allowing for more parking spaces. Comm. Moore asked whether staff is aware of any data which correlates the number of cars at a house based on the size of the house. . He felt that larger- houses probably will have more interior storage area; therefore, the parking spaces will be used as parking spaces Smaller houses without the storage space might utilize the garage for storage, thereby using the parking space for something other than parking. Mr. Schubach stated that large houses usually do not provide much storage space beyond what is required by the code. Comm. Moore was not convinced that large houses necessarily have more cars, noting that no data has been provided verifying this fact. Mr. Schubach stated that staff will continue to study this issue and will return with additional data in the next few months. Churn. Ingell noted concern that action on this issue is taking place before all available data has been provided. He felt that this matter could wait and be studied along with the housing element. Public Hearing opened at 8:12 P.M. by Chun. Ingell. P.C. Minutes 3/6/90 x Dean Nota, 2467 Myrtle Avenue, architect, addressed the Commission and: (1) discussed projects he has worked on in the R-1 zone; (2) stated that he designs custom homes for people who intend to live in them themselves; (3) reported that there is a good trend afoot where people want to build homes to live in rather than for speculation; (4) said that quality construction is good for cities; (5) stated that most people are concerned with three issues when they are designing a home: size, view, and livability; (6) stated that the 17 -foot setback is one of three elements which must be taken into account when building a home, the other two being measurement of height and the open space element; (7) said that people are being turned away from- the community because the requirements are too restrictive, especially the 17 -foot setback requirement; (8) explained that there are too many variables in the requirements, and the issue of aesthetics is not adequately addressed; (9) felt that the issue of parking off the street should be addressed; (10) stated that he supports the staff' recommendation, however, he would like the option of being able to handle the three parking spaces in his own manner rather than having inflexible requirements. Mr. Nota continued and: (1) stated that the 17 -foot setback is a significant issue, especially in light of the other setback requirements; (2) agreed that building bulk is a significant problem, but with the 17 -foot setback requirement, a building tends to become an elevated mass in order to accommodate the ground -level setbacks; (3) felt that flexibility should be provided and that the 17 -foot setback should be eliminated Mr. Nota went on: (1) discussed on -street parking on public rights-of-way, stating that requiring someone to provide a 17 -foot setback in addition to the very wide area of the right-of- way is unreasonable; (2) felt that staff should -address this issue further, stating that the measurement should be taken from the back of the sidewalk; (3) continued by discussing the lots on his street, Myrtle Avenue, in regard to the width of the street; (4) noted that property is very expensive and people tend to want to park off of the street and use the rear yard setback for open space, which he felt goes against the spirit of the requirement to provide additional parking; (5) disagreed with staffs suggestion that homes over 3000 square feet will require four parking spaces, explaining that no other cities he has ever worked in have such a requirement, and most do not require more than two parking spaces; (6) did not agree with three spaces either, but said he could work with such a requirement; (7) said that real estate is actually more expensive in Hermosa. Beach because so much of the building area is taken away; (8) urged that there be flexibility in the requirements so that good designs can be provided. Wilma Burt, 1152 7th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) opposed piecemeallegislation; (2) said that most of the lots -in the R-1 areas and some R-2 areas east of the highway do not have alleys; (3) said that 90 percent of the lots are not more than 25 feet apart, other than those which have been combined; (4) discussed properties on narrow lots on her street, stating that some people do not park in the garages but on the street; (5) discussed the various setback requirements, stating that many of the lots east of the highway are only 25 feet; and the 17 -foot setback requirement eliminates too much of the buildable area; (6) said that there must be a variety of rules to accommodate different situations; (7) stated that this decision is being done piecemeal, and she did not feel it is imperative that a decision be made -on this issue immediately; (8) felt that the maneuvering area in alleys does not have to be as large as that being suggested, stating that she has a large car and can get in and out of her garage easily; (9) stated that she does not want to see more paving at new buildings. Steve ,Breed, 429 31st Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) said that he will soon be moving because his current home is too small to do anything with based on all the current restrictions, and he will be renting it out; (2) said that there are problems on building on 30- by 70 -foot lots because the 17 -foot setback requirement renders the lot practicallyuribuildable; (3) suggested that the 17 -foot setback requirement be waived on lots of 25 and 30 feet in width; (4) also felt that the 23 -foot turning radius should be waived, especially since that is not a State requirement; (5) agreed with the requirement of three parking spaces for houses under 3000 square feet; (6) discussed the north end of the City, stating that no houses there have the 17 -foot setback; (7) said that the houses in the north end have aprons of between three feet and eleven feet, and there does not appear to be any problem; (8) urged the Commission to address this P.C. Minutes 3/6/90 issue immediately, especially in light of the fact that many people are moving away and renting out their homes because they can't do anything with them; (9) suggested that this issue be studied further before action is taken; (10) discussed open space and stated that people with small lots should be given greater flexibility and creativity. Howard Longacre, addressed the Commission and: (1) supported the 17 -foot 'setback requirement, stating that it has done wonders for the City and has contributed to older' units being able to have more residents since additional parking spaces are provided; (2) said that new homes are providing more parking; (3) noted that older homes in the City were designed as cottages, and now much larger homes are being built; (4) said that the 17 -foot setback requirement is not applicable to many of the lots in the City; (5) felt that the requirement for three parking spaces should be maintained, but did not think that the nine -foot setback should be used as a guest space; (6) felt that all houses, especially those over 2000 square feet, need at least three spaces, and houses over 3000 square feet should have four parking spaces; (7) did not favor this piecemeal approach; (8) favored flexibility so that architects can design attractive projects; (9) said that he will continue to support the 17 -foot setback requirement until a better solution is found. Gerry Compton, 832 7th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) noted that neither staff nor the Commission has ever suggested that there be a 17 -foot setback off alleys; (2) gave background history on the issue of the 17 -foot setback; (3) said that setbacks off of alleys remove potential ground space; (4) noted that the original purpose of the 17 -foot setback was to prevent people from parking over the sidewalk; (5) felt that the 17 -foot setback should be measured from the inside edge of the sidewalk; (6) noted that many streets are public rights-of- way and are very wide, therefore, it is not feasible to require the 17 -foot setback in addition to the width of the street; (7) did not feel that a sea of concrete should be created in order to meet the 17 -foot setback; (8) opposed the requirement of four parking spaces for homes over 3000 square feet; (9) felt that the issue which needs to be addressed is the loss of on -street parking; (10) said that no other cities require so many parking spaces; (11) said that new people coming into town should not be penalized for trying to build a new project in the R-1 zone; (12) said that R-1 builders are going to other cities, because so much property is being taken away to meet the requirements; (13) stated that bulk is being pushed up into the air in order to meet the requirements. Mr. Compton continued: (1) said that the issue of through lots is very important; (2) said that people want to park in front rather than in the rear, thereby losing their rear yards; (3) felt that people should be allowed to use the front yard as open space; (4) favored the text amendment except for the portion requiring four parkin spaces; (5) discussed with Comm. Rue various ways to provide green open space rather than a sea of concrete in front yards. Public Hearing closed at 8:49 P.M. by Chmn. Ingell. • Comm. Rue stated that he is not particularly a proponent of the 17 -foot setback, explaining that he feels architects should have the flexibility to provide an attractive, livable building. He felt that the proposed amendment appears to be a viable solution. He felt that three parking spaces is acceptable; however, he did not support requiring four spaces for projects over 3000 square feet. He does not feel it is appropriate to encourage people on through lots to park on the street and thereby use on -street parking. Comm. Peirce noted that everyone's major concern is with loss of parking, and he noted that parking is the biggest problem in the City. He felt that it is important for new projects to provide the proper amount of parking. He said that people tend to want to max out their projects and therefore don't want to provide an additional parking space. He stated that he supports staffs recommendation one hundred percent. Comm Ketz stated that she hears more complaints about the 17 -foot setback requirement than anything else in the. City. She felt that the proposed text amendment is a good first step in remedying the problem because the 17 -foot setback puts a burden on small lots trying to P.C. Minutes 3/6/90 develop homes and meeting all of the requirement. She did not support the four parking spaces, however, stating that this is a beach town and such a requirement would be too much of a burden on single-family homes. She did not feel that single-family residence create as many problems as condominiums. She stated that condos put more of a demand on street parking than single homes. She further noted that other cities do not require as much parking as is being proposed now. She concluded by stating that she supports the text amendment with the exception of the required four parking spaces for homes of over 3000 square feet, noting that no data has been provided proving that four spaces are necessary. Comm. Moore stated that he feels three parking spaces are sufficient, and he -did not feel that the City should be legislating requirements of more than three spaces: He felt that the designer should be allowed flexibility to determine where the spaces will be. He discussed the problem of people parking over the sidewalk and the implementation of the 17 -foot setback requirement as an attempt to curtail that problem. He felt that the 17 -foot setback is rather a draconian measure to cure the problem, and he felt it would be appropriate :to enforce the current requirements that people not block sidewalks. He stated that he could support the issue as related to alleys; however, he favored removing the 17 -foot setback requirement so long as the adequate parking can be provided. Comm. Moore felt that the measurements should be taken from the sidewalk rather than from the property line. Chmn Ingell agreed with staffs proposal; however, he noted the importance of the issue and the fact that it is being further studied by staff and will come back before the Commission with the housing element. He did not feel that all the applicable data has been studied at this time; therefore, he tended to be more conservative in his opinion since not all the material has been examined related to parking. He felt that if action is to be taken on this one small piece of the issue, the action should be very conservative. Churn Ingell suggested that the staffs recommendation be approved, with the requirement for four parking spaces for houses of more than 3000 square feet. MOTION by Coram. Rue, seconded by Comm. Moore, to approve staffs recommendation, with the following amendments: (1) that wording be added to Section 4 specifying that the measurement for the 17 -foot setback (front and back) shall be taken from the inside portion of the existing sidewalk, or future sidewalk if none is currently existing He clarified 'that his motion also includes measuring setbacks other than those on alleys; and (2) that the provision requiring four parking spaces for buildings over 3000 square feet be deleted. Chmn. Ingell asked whether this matter was noticed to include areas other than alleys. Mr. Schubach stated that, since this item was continued from a previous meeting, it would be necessary for him to obtain a copy of the original notice. Comm. Peirce asked about the legality of measuring from a point in the public right-of-way. Mr. Lee explained that there could be a problem of potential liability on the part of the City if the measurement is taken from the public right-of-way. He continued by explaining that private use of a public right-of-way could cause problems. He suggested, instead, that a recommendation could be sent to the Council that the measurements be studied in regard to public rights-of-way. He continued by discussing the issue of encroachments into the public rights-of-way and stated that it is currently being studied in regard to the liability issue. Chinn. Ingell stated that it would be more appropriate to vote on staffs recommendation and suggest that staff study the issue of measuring from the inside of the sidewalk and return with additional information when the housing element is addressed in several months. -/3- P.C. Minutes 3/6/90 Comm. Rue stated that rights-of-way have not been, studied in the past for inclusion because they have provided additional open space in the City.' Chmn. Ingell noted that Mr. Schubach had left Coundil Chambers to get a copy of the original noticing for this matter. k Recess taken from 9:04 P.M. until 9:14 P.M. Mr. Schubach informed the Commission that the Council had specially requested that action be taken in regard to setbacks off of alleys. Comm. Rue stated that the Commission is making a recommendation to the Council; therefore, he felt his motion is appropriate. He clarified that his intent is that if there is a 17 -foot setback and the easement exceeds that, then the structure would be placed at the regular front yard setback. Comm. Ketz stated that she would feel uncomfortable voting on the front yard setback at this time, especially since the attorney has advised that there could be a potential liability problem. She felt that the entire 17 -foot setback issue should be studied, noting that this , action is focused on alleys. Comm. Rue stated that recycling of older properties will not be encouraged with the requirements to provide huge front yard setbacks for parking, He stated that it is currently being encouraged to maintain multiple -unit dwellings without adequate parking. He said that many people will not build in this City because of all the restrictions, and he felt that more should be done to encourage high-quality projects. He felt that hismotion would offer that encouragement. Mr. Lee stated that the motion as proposed is in keeping with the noticing of the issue. (Vote on Comm. Rue's motion, Page 10) AYES: Comms. Moore, Rue NOES: Comms. Ketz, Peirce, Chmn. Ingell ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None (MOTION FAIIS.) MOTION by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Chmn. Ingell, to approve staffs recommendation, Resolution P.C. 9013, as written. Comm. Moore stated that he would vote against the motion solely on the basis that he does not favor requiring four parking spaces for homes of 3000 square feet and more. Comms. Ketz and Rue concurred. AYES: Comm. Peirce, Chmn. Ingell NOES: Comms. Ketz, Moore, Rue ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None (MOTION FAILS.) MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by Comm. Ketz, to approve staffs recommendation, Resolution P.C. 90-13 with the following amendment: to delete the requirement of four parking spaces for single-family residences over 3000 square feet. P.C. Minutes 3/6/90 AYES: Comms. Ketz, Moore, Rue NOES: Comm. Peirce, Chmn. Ingell ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None (MOTION PASSES.) Comm. Rue urged those in the audience who spoke on this matter to return when the issue is again addressed during the housing element. %S'- P.C. Minutes. 3/ 6 / 90 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission (Continued from February 20, 1990 meeting) SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 90-1 LOCATION: CITYWIDE INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL February 12, 1990 Regular Meeting of March 6, 1990 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS TO ELIMINATE THE 17 -FOOT PARKING SETBACK REQUIREMENT ON ALLEYS Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the proposed resolution recommending adoption of the subject text amendment. Background At their meeting of December 12, 1989, the City Council directed staff to prepare an interim ordinance which would waive the 17 -foot setback requirement for garages if four (4) parking spaces are provided on site. This came about as a result of the discussion of the Variance request at 3133 The Strand. At their meeting of January 9, 1990, the City Council, instead of adopting a proposed interim ordinance, directed staff to prepare text amendments for consideration that would eliminate the 17 -foot parking setback requirement on alleys. Analysis The 17 -foot setback requirement for garages was established in 1986, for the purpose of providing enough room behind garages in all zones to park a standard vehicle which would •not block sidewalks and to provide additional off-street parking. The City Council when establishing this requirement modified the Planning Commission recommendation to allow setbacks on alleys to be either 17 -feet, 8 -feet, or 3 -feet. Application of the 17 -foot setback has indeed accomplished the objectives of the Council. Many residential buildings have been constructed in conformance with the 17—foot setback requirement, and in most cases it has resulted in the provision of more than the required parking. Therefore when considering the elimination of the 17 -foot setback requirement on alleys it must be realized that it will likely result in less off-street parking in ,the future. Complaints and objections regarding the 17 -foot setback requirement have come primarily from owners of shallow single-family lots who are concerned about dedicating such a large portion of their ground floor to parking area. For example, lots with a 70 foot depth after providing for the setback, the required garage depth, the front and rear setbacks, and the open space requirements are left with a maximum ground floor dimension of only 20-27 feet limiting the potential uses of the ground floor. The situation is not much better for 80 -foot deep lots. It can also be argued that this concern applies to all residential lots where the options for the ground floor plan, perhaps unnecessarily, are being limited by the 17 -foot requirement on alleys. For many of the average size lots in the city three or four parking spaces can easily be provided without the use of the 17 -foot setback. _ - To address these concerns regarding the. 17 -foot setback, staff has resurrected the original recommendation of 'the Planning Commission regarding this issue. The recommendation was to require one of the following setbacks for garages facing an alley: 17 feet, 8 feet, or 3 feet; and for projects on alleys of 15 feet or less the turning radius requirements.of Section 1161 would apply. Staff is including a modification to this recommendation that the garage setback be either 3 -feet, 9 -feet, or 17 -feet. Staff believes that the .9 -foot setback is necessary to provide the minimum dimension for a car parked parallel behind a garage. This space would qualify as a required guest space. Staff is also recommending dimensional standards for parallel parking of a minimum length of 22 -feet to provide necessary maneuvering space. To lessen the impact on parking, staff is also including a provision that single-family houses containing four or more bedrooms, or more than 3000 square feet, be required to provide two guest spaces. In all other cases, however, projects will only have to meet the minimum parking requirements as established in the zoning ordinance. In sum, staff believes the proposed amendments address the immediate concerns noted above in a manner that does not sacrifice the integrity of existing parking and zoning requirements. Staff also believes that these amendments may have an ancillary benefit of providing a greater incentive for developers trying to maximize floor space to use,the allay for access rather than the street. �. CONCUR: ` /Ken Robertson / Associate Planner Michael Schubach Planning Director Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. C.C. Minutes 12/12/89, and 1/9/90 3. P.C. Resolution 86-27 4. P.C. Minutes of 3/18/86 /7- p1andoc/pcsr17 Ac -.: To adopt Ordinance No. 89-102)1. Motion - don, second Creighton. So ordere 3. ITEMS REMOVED FR. THE CONSENT ENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION: Items (e) , (f) , ' , and (1) wer, .iscussed at this time but are 1' • in order for clarity. 4. •ITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC - None .. • PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF DENIAL BY PLANNING COMMISSION OF VARIANCE REQUEST TO 17' SETBACK AT 3133 THE STRAND. Christopher & Janet Coppersmith, appellants. Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated December 4, 1989. Supplemental letter from Lawrence S. Gray, Jr., 2426 The Strand, dated December 11, 1989. Two supplemental memos from Planning Director Michael Schubach, dated December 11, 1989..Supplemental letter from Kenneth Snyder, 3001 The Strand, dated December 12, 1989. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach. Addressing the Council on this item were: Chris Coppersmith - 3133 The Strand - in favor Brian O'Mally - 3330 The Strand - in favor Joanne Bland - Resident of Hermosa Beach - in favor Don Hovis - Architect, 1848 S. Elena, R.B. - in favor Howard Longacre -.1221 Seventh Place - opposed Chris Coppersmith - rebuttal Proposed Action: To approve the variance. Motion Essertier, second Wiemans. Objection by Mid- stokke, Sheldon, and Mayor Creighton. Motion fails. Action - To direct staff to return to Council on January 9, 1990 with an interim ordinance, pursuant "to Section 65858 of the State Planning and Zoning Law, which waives the 17' setback on alleys, if parking space is provided for four (4) vehicles. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered Final Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5334, entitled, "A RESOLUTION DENYING THE APPEAL OF, AND THEREBY AFFIRMING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A VARIANCE TO ALLOW AN ENCROACHMENT INTO THE REQUIRED 17' GARAGE SETBACK AT 3133 THE STRAND, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 23, BLOCK 1. SHAKESPEARE TRACT." Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. A recess was called at 9:00 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:15 P.M. Minutes 12-12-89 eate limited truck routes along the following: 1. Gould Ave. (P.C.H. to Morningside 27th St. (Morningside to Greenwich Village) Hermosa Ave. (Greenwich Village to Pier Ave.) 4. Manhattan Ave. north City limit to 27th St. Providing a •.rking structure downtown to enhance business possi y on northwest corner Manhattan/ (study ok) Pier Ave. north 'ty limit to 27th St. 5 Provide residential •-rking structures to el= ate parking deficiency in •me neighborhoods. 0 Planning Commission reques to change tle "non- (study ok) residential" to "commercial" -n page 1. 5 0 Traffic intrusion on Monterey/two way traffic on (study ok) Valley between 2nd and Herond• (Re ' -r to Exhibit "C") 5 0 Angle parking on Hermosa ' e. to impro - parking (study ok) and create bicycle lane 3 2 Midstokke Essertier The staff wa directed to. prepare a Resolution-flecting the straw vote- on the above matrix items, for approval at the January 2-, 1990 meeting on the Consent Calendar. A recess was called at 11:10 P.M. The Meeting reconvened at 11:27 P.M. 6. INTERIM ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE 17 FT. SETBACK THE PROVISION OF. FOUR PARKING SPACES, AND TO WAIVE THE 17 FT. SETBACK FOR CERTAIN SMALL LOTS AND LOTS ON NARROW ALLEYS. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 2, 1990. An alternate Ordinance was submitted by Michael Schubach dated January 9, 1990. A staff report was presented, by Director Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Chris Coppersmith - 3133.The Strand Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street Mike Sanders - 441 Thirty-first Street Keith Reeves - 429 First Street Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue Jerry Compton - 837 Seventh Street Kari Person - 332 Thirty-first Street John Thomas - 335 thirty-first Street Joanne Bland - 2728 The Strand Minutes 1-9-90 Jan Coppersmith - 3133 The Strand Bob Strokke - 3205 The Strand The Public Hearing was closed. Action: To direct staff to prepare a Resolution of In- tent, incorporating Council and Citizen comments with special attention to 30' x 70' lots, narrow alleys, turning radius and then bring back on the Consent Calen- dar at next meeting, January 23, 1990. Motion Midstokke, second Sheldon. So ordered, noting the objection of Wiemans. Final Action: To amend motion to Receive and File and direct City Manager to expedite. Motion Midstokke, second Sheldon. So ordered, noting the objection of Wiemans. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD GYMNASIUM HEALTH AND FITNESS CE TER TO THE PERMITTED USE LIST FOR THE C-2 ZONE, W H ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memorandum from Pla ing Director Michael Schubach dated January 2, 1990. staff report was presented by Director Schuba The •ublic Hearing was opened. Coming forw- d to speak were: Wilma Bur - 1152 Seventh Street John Warre - 1120 Hermosa - submitte• a petition w/600 signatures f• other than a retail store at site. The Public Heari Action: To-introdu Motion Essertier, se was closed. e Ordinance o. 90-1022. nd Shel•6n. So ordered. Final Action: To waive f 1 reading of Ordinance No. 90-1022, entitled, 'SAN ••DINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD GYMNASIUM EALTH AND FITNESS CENTER AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE/C-2, • STRICTED COMMERCIAL ZONE, WITH A CONDITINAL US, PERMIT, s D TO ESTABLISH PARKING STANDARDS FOR SAID ,USE AND THE •'OPTION OF AN ENVIRON- MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. • AYES: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, W -mans, Mayor Creighton NOES: None/ ,/' 8. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO GRAN' A MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AUTO AGENCIES, I CLUDING STORAGE. AND SALES OF PARTS AT 2771, 2851, 2901 A 3001 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, VASEK POLAK AUTO DEALERS PS. Coincilmembers Kathleen Midstokke and Albert Wiema appellants. Memorandum from Planning Director Michae Minutes 1-9-90 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26. 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 86-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AN AMENDMENT TO RESIDENTIAL PARK- ING STANDARDS, I.E., GUEST PARKING, GARAGE MAINTENANCE, ROLL -UP DOORS, REPLACEMENT PARKING AND DRIVEWAY SETBACKS. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a;.public hearing on March 18, 1986.and made the following Findings: A. The population of Hermosa Beach continues to grow and the ratio of vehicles to available parking continues to grow disproportionately; B. Adequate off-site and on-site parking is an important asset to maintaining the well being of the residents; C. Requiring additional parking is consistent withthe General Plan and the Local Coastal Program; D. Existing parking in some instances has been converted ille- gally to dwelling units or used for storage; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of -Hermosa Beach, California does hereby recommend the following standards: Where garages or parking stalls front on a public street, the minimum setback shall be 17 feet provided roll -up garage doors are installed; a`"minimum of 20 feet shall be required where standard garage doors are installed in the R-1, R-2, R - 2B, R-3 and R-3 zones. 2. The second floor level of a dwelling unit may project over a driveway fronting on a street to within the prescribed set- back required by the zone in which the development is pro- posed, or exists. 3. A minimum of 1 guest parking space for every two (2) dwelling units should be required for development in the R-2, R -2B, R- 3 and R -P zones; and 1 guest space for each dwelling in the R-1 zone.. In the R-2, R -2B, R-3 and R -P zones, all required parking spaces, other than guest spaces, including replacement of on- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C \-- ,1 street parking may be tandem when access private driveway. i is from any alley or 5. In all residential zones, parking spaces shall be maintained free and clear and utilized solely for the parking of au- thorized vehicles (obstructive storage prohibited). a. Authorized vehicles shall mean automobiles, motorcycles, light trucks and vans not exceeding 1, 1/2 ton capacity. Trailors, boats, recreational vehicles, motor homes, campers (not mounted to a motorized. vehicle), tractor trucks and inoperable vehicles_ are prohibited. 6. Guest spaces in the R-1, R-2, R -2B, R-3 and R -P zones may be placed in tandembehind required spaces, but no guest space shall be behind another guest space. 7. Prohibition of open parking within the front setback shall be deleted [Sections 1157(C)(D) and (F)]. 8. Non -tandem 2 -car garages fronting on alleys shall have one of. the following setbacks: 17 -feet, 8 feet or 3 feet, except on alleys 15 feet in width, or less. 9. Non -tandem 2 -car garages fronting on alleys 15 feet or less in width shall have setbacks according to Parking Lot Design standards (Section 1161). 10. An 8 foot x 20 foot parallel parking space perpendicular to non -tandem 2 -car spaces accessed from an alley may be pro- vided to meet guest parking requirements; when the non -tandem 2 car spaces are within a garage, a roll -up door is required. 11. Elimination of off-site parking spaces because of curb -cuts in conjunction with the development of apartments as well as condominiums shall require on-site replacement parking spaces. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Compton,Peirce,Rue,Schulte,Chmn.Sheldon NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 86-27 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Com- mission of ommissionof the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting on March 18, 1986. Chuck She don, Chairman /1/.96 Date C PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 18,$86 PAGE 11 . mm. Rue questioned whether there would be wording to the effect that a property owher would have the ability to request a zone change, without precise plans at the ti of th- request. Comm. ' : irce stated that if wording is being changed in the ordinance, he would prefer to see the , •rding of the text before voting upon such a change. MOTION WIT second. RAWN by Comm. Peirce as maker and agreed to by C rein. Sheldon as MOTION by , Comm. Schulte, seconded by Comm. Peirce, ' to approve the staff recommended Item No. as written and incorporate that item i o thetext indicated on the last page of the sta report; and the resulting consolid ion will be approved or revised by the Planning Co ission at the next meeting. Comm. Rue felt that a propert owner should be able to . pply for a rezone without first obtaining a precise plan. He que ioned whether wor••ing to this effect would be in the resolution. He asked whether the . ker of the mot' a n would include that wording in the motion. He stated that he. would lik- to make it lear to property owners that if they want to acquire property and build on it, that the e is a way of doing itand being assured that the zoning will be rezonable to C-3 a a ture time. He felt that it should be very clearly labeled to allow someone to know certain that it will be C-3 PP; one could then proceed with his plans. Comm. Peirce felt that it would be - • isservice • A neighbors to allow someone to apply for a zone change without first pro iding a precise •lap stating what is to be done with the property. He felt that the o.'ect is to control encroachment into residential areas. He favored the requiring of precise plans. He oted concern over creeping commercialism. Comm. Rue felt that th- e are other more appropriate time for property owners to interface with the city i . regard to proposed developments. Comm. Peirce fel that there is more of an chance to control development before rezones are approved. He -felt that zone change requests and precise DIan requirements should go together. Comm. Compton felt that there needs to be clarification in regard to precise clans. AYES: f/ Comms. Peirce, Schulte, Chmrn. Sheldon NOES: Comms. Compton, Rue ABSENT: None TEXT AMENDMENT TO MODIFY RESIDENTIAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS, I.E., GUEST PARKING, GARAGE MAINTENANCE, ROLL -UP DOORS AND SETBACKS Mr. -Schubach gave staff report dated March 11, 1986. He discussed the proposed text amendments. He stated that he would continue to recommend to the City Council that large developments should not have tandem guest spaces; but on smaller developments, theycan be permitted and possibly be assigned: He continued by discussing the setback requirements. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 18, 1986\ 1 PAGE 12 Chmn. Sheldon felt that tandem guest parking is ludicrous. He felt that there should be one guest space per unit. Comm. Peirce stated that it is necessary to prevent cars from overhanging the sidewalk. Public Hearing opened at 10:33 P.M. by Chmn. Sheldon. Susan McFarland, 31 8th Street, Hermosa Beach, stated that the proposed text amendments to the residential parking requirements will have a direct impact on property she owns. She described the area she lives in and discussed the setback issues, stating that she has only a three-foot setback. She noted concern over setbacks, tandem parking spaces, and off-street parking spaces. She discussed the different lot sizes involved in this proposal. She favored keeping parked cars off the street. Chmn. Sheldon gave background information on this issue. Public Hearing closed at 10:45 P.M. by Chmn. Sheldon. Comm. Compton discussed those situations where garages or parking stalls front on public streets or alleys. Mr. Schubach noted that there are many unusually -shaped lots in the City and discussed parking for those lots. Chmn. Sheldon focused the discussion on Recommendation No. 1: "Where garages or parking stalls front on a public street or alley, the minimum setback shall be 17 feet provided roll -up garage doors are installed; a minimum of 20 feet shall be required where standard garage doors are installed in the R-1, R-2, R-3, and R -P zones." He stated that he had no problems with this wording; athough, he favored adding wording which says "or no setback or two feet." Comm. Compton noted that the minimum set by the city in an R-3 zone off of an alley is three feet at the lower level and one foot above. He stated that on an alley, more than 17 feet is required because there must be a 23 -foot turning radius. He noted that most alleys are not more than 20. feet. He noted that the setback would then need to be 23 feet. Mr. Schubach stated that the size of the spaces is being changed to 17 feet with the roll - up garage doors. Comm. Compton noted that the use of tandem parking is being encouraged merely by allowing it in the city. He stated that tandem parking will be used in alleys and discussed what will occur in these instances. He stated that if tandem parking is allowed off the back with guest spaces behind the tandem spaces, then potentially all parking can be taken off the street. He felt that this is the best solution. He suggested that guest parking not be put on the streets. Comm. Compton felt that if 17 feet is being required for setbacks, tandem parking should be allowed. Comm. Peirce stated that the object is to try to stop cars from parking on the aprons of streets and from hanging over onto the sidewalks. •••-••••:Z.. •••••••• i PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 18, 1986 PAGE 13 Comm. Compton stated that he had no objections to Recommendation No. 1, stating that all that needs to be done is remove the words "or alley." He stated that another clause must be added which discusses alleys. Comm. Compton favored eight -foot setbacks for double garages and three feet for tandem garages, noting that he was referring only to alleys. MOTION by Comm. Compton, seconded by Comm. Peirce: To approve staff Recommendation No. 1, but to remove the. words "or alley"; To add wording stating: "Where side-by-side garages or parking stalls front on an alley the minimum setback shall be either 3 feet, 8 feet, or 17 feet, provided roll -up garage doors are installed; or to allow three feet only behind tandem spaces on alleys and not require roll -up garage doors; To approve staff Recommendation No. 2, but to add the words "or alley"; To approve staff Recommendation No. 3; To approve staff Recommendation No. 4, but with the additional wording: "In the R-2, R -2B, R-3, and R -P zones, all required parking spaces other than guest spaces (including off-street replacements) may be tandem when access is from an alley"; To approve staff Recommendation No. 5, but to define "authorized vehicles"; To add a recommendation stating that .parking in front setbacks. on City property shall be eliminated; To add a recommendation that staff study the issue of parking on City -owned easements and requiring that, to do so, one must be .. required to go through variance proceedings. Chmn. Sheldon asked that staff and the City Attorney study the issue of parking on walk streets and sideyards of the Strand, north to south. He questioned how an enforceable ordinance could be passed which would preclude this kind of parking. AYES: Comms. Compton, Peirce, Rue, Schulte, Chmn. Sheldon NOES: None - ABSENT: None Dear City Council A. O1 132=11:10, D.D.S. 1711 Via El Prado, Suite 400 Redondo Beach, California 90277 August 12, 1990- I am addressing this letter regarding Resolution r.C.90-13 recommending text ammendment to eliminate the 17 ft. parking required on alleys and adoption of Negative Declarations. There are also a number of street to streets in the city. I know that this is another problem where parking can be on either street making the determination of the front and rear become more of a problem. There is only one location in Hermosa Beach that is street to street, where all the garages are on the east side, where there is a separate 15 ft-20ft "alley", wheie no car has to back into the street (being Hermosa Ave.) All homes in this R-1 area face the west, this area is starting from 2652 The strand extending north to 35th St. I am asking that you also consider including this isolated, misfit section, in the city in your final decision of this resolution or otherwise consider making this 15 ft.-20ft. "alley" off Iiermosa Ave. referred to as Shakespere alley to many in the area a legal alley. If it is already being included in this resolution; please disregard this letter. ";.e./ A. Sohn Berardo SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION April 23, 1990 Mayor and City Council Members; Tonight you will be hearing public testimony on text amendment 90-1. As part of your deliberation please include the follow ing information: 1. The original intent of the 17 foot and 20 foot set back requirement was to remedy possible litigation problems that arose when cars parked behind garages and encroached upon the sidewalk. 2. The original ordinance was never intended, to apply to alley's or shakespeare tract houses, nor was the intent of the ordinance to provide extra parking. 3. The ordinance before you tonight does not reflect the majority recommendation of the Planning Commission. The motion by Commissioner Rue was to approve staff recommendation with two amendments. One of the amendments was that the provision requiring four parking spaces for buildings over 3000 square feet be deleted. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION s 4 5 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 90- A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO CONSIDER A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO PROHIBIT THE SALE OF SINGLE CONTAINERS. OF ALCOHOL FROM STORES LOCATED NEAR THE PUBLIC BEACH WHEREAS, the public drinking of alcoholic beverages on and near the beach is an ongoing problem, causing a nuisance to residents and visitors to Hermosa Beach, and contributing to noise and litter problems, and; WHEREAS, according to the Police Department a significant part of the problem is due to the availability for purchase of single cans and bottles of beer, wine coolers, and other alcoholic beverages from stores located in close proximity to the beach, and; WHEREAS, the prohibition of the sales of single containers of alcoholic beverages from locations near the beach would contribute towards a reduction in these problems and, therefore, would benefit the public health, safety, and welfare, and; WHEREAS, the City Council desires to study and consider a zoning ordinance amendment to resolve this problem, and; NOW., THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby direct staff to study and consider a zoning ordinance amendment for consideration by the Planning Commission to prohibit the sale of single containers of alcohol in those areas of the City determined to be problem areas, and schedule the appropriate public hearings for said amendments. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1990. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FO : v CITY CLERK SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION( CITY ATTORNEY a/rsintent - 1 - Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 17, 1990. Regular Meeting of April 24, 1990 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 89-16 LOCATION: 74 PIER AVENUE, ROBERT'S LIQUOR, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 14, BLOCK 12, TRACT 4340, HERMOSA BEACH APPELLANTS: COUNCILMEMBERS MIDSTOKKE AND ESSERTIER APPEAL: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO ELIMINATE THE CONDITION PROHIBITING THE SALE OF SINGLE CONTAINERS OF BEER Recommendation Staff recommends that the decision of the Planning Commission be overturned by adoption of the attached resolution, and that the sale of single containers of beer be prohibited; or, return to the Planning Commission to consider including the prohibition of single containers. of wine, wine coolers, and possibly other types of liquor. Background At their meeting of March 6, 1990, the Planning Commission amended the C.U.P. for Robert's Liquor by eliminating the condition prohibiting the sale of single containers of beer. The Planning Commission also further amended the C.U.P. by adding conditions requiring that single containers be placed in clear packaging and requiring additional signs to warn patrons of the illegality of drinking on the beach and in public places. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission minutes and staff report for further background. Analysis The PlanningCommission based their decision in response to the testimony at the meeting and the recommendation of the Police Department. Since that time, staff has been presented a compelling reason to justify overturning their decision. A representative from Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) indicated that this type of requirement has been implemented in problem areas, and was effective at reducing drinking in public places. The attached resolution would impose a condition consistent with the original condition recommended by the Police Department on Robert's Liquor allowing the sale of beer in four -packs or larger quantities only, and prohibiting the sale of beer in single cans or bottles. The proposed condition also includes a clarification to allow the sale of single containers of over 20 ounces, since some imported and domestic beers are sold in 24 ounce or 32 ounce containers. 1 In regards to other liquor establishments in problem areas of the. City this condition or similar condition can still be applied in many cases. For example, existing liquor stores which need a C.U.P. because of the City's amortization ordinance, and any existing liquor stores which currently have a C.U.P. where revocation is considered but instead new conditions of approval ar -/a • ded . ichae Schubach, Planning Director CONCUR: evin North• aft City Manager Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. P.C. Staff Report/Minutes 3/6/90 3. Resolution P.C. 90-20 4. Resolution P.C. 90-2 5. P.C. Minutes 1/3/90 6. Correspondence City Manager's Comment: Banning single can sales near the beach via CUP's is a cumbersome process that causes unequal restrictions during the phase-in period for our competing off -sale liquor businesses. The City Attorney has researched this matter and recently advised that there may well be ways to apply this ban in the problem area by oridnance. This is a more expeditious and fair way to imple- ment this method (single can ban) to mitigate our public drinking problems. In addition to tonight's action, staff recommends the City Council direct the Planning Commission and staff to review a ban by ordinance at the earliest possible date. 2 2 3 4 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ON APPEAL TO INCLUDE A CONDITION TO PROHIBIT THE SALE OF SINGLE CONTAINERS OF BEER AT 74 PIER AVENUE "ROBERT'S LIQUOR" AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 14, BLOCK 12, TRACT 4340, HERMOSA BEACH WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 24, 1990, to receive oral and written testimony regarding an appeal of a Conditional Use Permit amendment which eliminated a condition to prohibit single containers of beer and wine coolers: A. The sale of general alcoholic beverages is being conducted in an existing establishment already licensed by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control; B. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding uses; C. Strict compliance with the conditions of approval will mitigate any negative impact resulting from the issuance of the conditional use permit; D. Prohibiting the sale of single containers of beer and wine coolers will alleviate drinking and littering problems on nearby public rights -of -ways and on the public beach; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby appprove a Conditional Use Permit, as amended with a condition prohibiting the sale of single containers of beer, at 74 Pier Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1. The hours of operation shall be limited to 8:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M. daily. 2. The estabishment shall not adversely affect the welfare of residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 3. The business shall provide adequate management and supervisory techniques to prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business or in the immediate area. 4. Alcoholic beverages shall only be sold to individuals over the age of 21 years old, and violations of this condition may result in revocation and /or a citation. 5. Signs shall be posted conspicuously and prominently at all exits and all check-out stands warning patrons who- purchase any and all types of alcoholic beverages that "possession and/or consumption of alcoholic beverages in any public sidewalk, parking lot, beach, and/or any public place is prohibited by law and subject to citation and fine. The City of Hermosa Beach vigorously enforces its liquor laws" Said signs shall be at least 12" X 14", shall be printed in a large type, permanently maintained, and shall be posted in visible locations. A minimum lettering size shall be established by the Planning Director and the .Police Department and shall be utilized on the signs. 6. T e s- - of beer -x.11 be by four pac' •r ix-p�ack con.-iners, o la :- quan •, or : tainers of not-les than 20 ounces. 7. An employee who is aware of the conditions of this conditional use permit shall be on the premises during business hours. a. All employees shall be given a copy of the conditional use permit and shall acknowledge by signature that the conditional use permit has been read and understood. 8. Adult magazine "R -Rated" shelf shall be located behind the counter, not accessible to minors. 9. There shall be no sale of sexually explicit "X -Rated" magazines, unless a conditional use permit is obtained, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 10. There shall be no sale of sexually explicit "X -Rated" video tapes, unless a conditional use permit is obtained, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 11. Clearly visible signs prohibiting loitering, littering, consumption of alcohol on the premises shall be posted in conspicuous location. 12. Measures shall be taken to control loitering on the public sidewalk at all times. 13. The exterior of the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner at all times. 14. The signs on the windows shall comply with the City Sign Ordinance. 15. Any violation of the conditions and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code shall be grounds for an immediate revocation hearing and/or citation. 16. The police chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists and may require the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel paid by the business. 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 17. Any changes to the exterior or interior design shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. 18. Prior to the conditional use permit being in effect, the. applicant shall submit to the planning department, a signed and notarized "Acceptance of Conditions" form. 19. A conditional use permit shall be recorded with the deed, and proof of recordation shall be submitted with the planning department. 20. The Planning Commission may review the conditional use permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. 21. This resolution supersedes P.C. Resolutions 90-2 and 90-20. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1990. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: A/pers74 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY BACKGROUND MATERIAL March 1, 1990 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission March 6, 1990. SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 89-16 LOCATION: 74 PIER AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 14, BLOCK 12, TRACT 4340, HERMOSA BEACH APPLICANT: SEI CHAN KIM 74 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: ELIMINATION OF THE CONDITION PROHIBITING THE SALE OF SINGLE CONTAINERS OF BEER Recommendation This condition was recommended by the Police Department which now recommends approval of this request provided condition No. 5 is amended. Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution incorporating said amendment. Background Roberts Liquor was one of eight Packaged Liquor Stores which was being operated as an off -sale alcohol beverage establishment without a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The Planning Commission, at their meeting of January 3, 1990, granted a Conditional Use Permit subject to conditions as recommended by staff. The applicant clearly stated at the meeting that he was aware of the conditions being imposed. Upon further review of the conditions, however, the applicant became concerned about condition No. 4(a) which reads: "Sale of single containers of beer, in a can or bottle, shall be prohibited." This condition was recommended by the Police Department and it was the first time the Planning Commission has imposed such a condition. Analysis The applicant is justly concerned about a significant loss of business because of this condition. No other liquor establishment has such a requirement and he feels this puts him at a great disadvantage to his competition. Nonetheless, this condition is perhaps could be justified in this instance because of the location of this store near the beach and downtown areas. However, staff doubts that the application of the condition will significanly reduce the problems of litter and public drinking as customers obviously can still purchase beer in 4 -packs or 6 -pack, individual bottles of wine, and individual containers of liquor or mixed cocktails. The question the Planning Commission should ask is whether or not the harm to this business in terms of loss potential sales is really worth the moderate or perhaps non-existent impact it will have on alleviating the problems. Attached is a a memo from the Police Department which summarizes their recommendation. Staff has included the new language in the amended resolution. 4447 obertson, Associate Planner CON1UR: Michel Schubach, Planning Director 2 Attachments 1. Memo from Police Department 2. Proposed Resolution 3. Resolution P.C. 90-2 4. P.C. Minutes 1/3/90 5. Application 6. Public Notice Affidavit 7. Correspondence i March 1, 1990 To: Michael Shubach Planning Director From: Commander Anthony Altfeld Field Services Division Police Department Subject: Response to CUP Amendment By Roberts Liquor After review of the request for a conditional use permit amendment to eliminate the condition prohibiting the sale of single containers of beer, in a can or bottle, at #74 Pier Avenue, Robert's Liquor, the Police Department will raise no objection provided the following: That Condition 5 of Resolution P.C. 90-2 also be amended to read: Signs shall be posted conspicuously at all exits from the location, as well as at all check-out stands in the location, warning patrons who purchase any and all types of alcoholic beverages that, possession and/or consumption of alcoholic beverages in any public sidewalk, parking lot, beach, and/or any public place is prohibited by law and subject to citation and fine. Signs shall be at least 12" X 14" and shall be properly maintained and of a permanent nature. The Police Department would be happy to meet with the owner's of th',business to assist them in drafting proper and appropriate language ,for'. thia signing. Commander An hon' Altfeld Field Serv(i\es Division Hermosa Beaeh Police Department PTION FROM SECTION 13-71B1 TO ALLOW A REMODEL AND EXPANSION TA�ri4 EXISTING lYG• NFORMING SINGLE -FAMILY DWELLING GREATER THAN A i ' o ' `CREASE IN VAL ATI • N AT :t " :1 _ TRAND A E ' A ITEM N • 12 Chmn Ingell asked whether anyone one citizen responded and stated that he w this matter. audienc resent to speak on this item, to which ble to return to the next meeting to speak on MOTION by Co •• s•. • • .re, seconded by Comm. Ketz, to continue this 1 schedul - • :• - eting, March 20, 1990. No objections; so ordered. the next regularly CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ELIMINATE THE CONDITION PROHIBITING THE SALE OF SINGLE CONTAINERS OF BEER AT 74 PIER AVENUE. ROBERT'S LIQUOR Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated March 1, 1990. This condition was recommended by the Police Department, which now recommends approval of this request, provided Condition No. 5 is amended. Staff recommended adoption of the proposed resolution incorporating said amendment. Robert's Liquor was one of eight packaged liquor stores which was being operated as an off -sale alcohol beverage establishment without a conditional use permit. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of January 3, 1990, granted a CUP, subject to the conditions recommended by staff. The applicant clearly stated at the meeting that he was aware of the conditions being imposed. Upon further review of the conditions, however, the applicant became concerned about Condition No. 4(a) which reads: "Sale of single containers of beer, in a can or bottle, shall be prohibited." This condition was recommended by the Police Department, and it was the first time that the Planning Commission had imposed such a condition. The applicant is justly concerned about a significant loss of business because of this condition. No other liquor establishment has such a requirement, and he feels this puts bim at a great disadvantage to his competition. Nonetheless, this condition could be justified in this instance because of the location of this store near the beach and downtown areas. However, staff doubts that the application of the condition will significantly reduce the problems of litter and public drinking, as customers obviously can still purchase beer in four -packs or six-packs, individual containers of wine, and individual containers of liquor or mixed cocktails. The question the Planning Commission should ask is whether or not the harm to this business in terms of loss potential sales is really worth the moderate or perhaps non-existent impact it will have on alleviating the problems. The Commission was provided with a copy of a letter dated March 1, 1990, from Commander Altfeld to the Planning Director, the subject of which is a response to conditional use permit amendment by Robert's Liquor. Staff noted that the new language has been incorporated into the amended resolution. Public Hearing opened at 7:28 P.M. by Chmn Ingell. Sei Chan Kim, 74 Pier Avenue, applicant, addressed the Commission. He stated that he did not understand the conditions at the time of approval; therefore, he is now requesting to amend the condition prohibiting single -container sales of beer. Comm. Rue noted concern that Mr. Kim had specifically stated at the public hearing at which this matter was first heard that he had read and understood the conditions being imposed on his business. P.C. Minutes 3/6/90 Mr. Kim stated that he was unaware of the imposition of a condition prohibiting single - container sales of beer until after he had received a letter from staff informing him of this condition. He then went to the Planning Department and requested an amendment to the CUP. He said that he did not receive a copy of the conditions prior to the public hearing. Mr. Schubach explained that copies of the conditions are sent to applicants prior to hearings; however, itis possible that the letter was not received by the applicant. Comm. Peirce noted that single containers are ready invitations to be taken outsideand consumed. He asked what assurances the applicant can provide to ensure that people will not purchase single containers of beer and drink them in a public place. Jerry Dowling, Dana Point, the applicant's landlord, addressed the Commission. He said that he and the applicant have discussed this matter and concern has been raised. Regarding the issue of posting a sign as recommended by the Police Department, he said that there should be uniform signage required at all such businesses within a certain radius of the beach advising that fines will be imposed if beer is consumed in a public area. Mr. Dowling continued by stating that it is not feasible to expect the applicant to provide a guarantee that beer sold at his store will not be consumed in a public place. He felt that the posting of signs, coupled with adequate police enforcement, should provide a deterrent. He stated that it is the responsibility of the police, not the applicant, to ensure that people are not drinking on the beach. He noted, however, that the applicant will cooperate and provide the proper signage as requested. He said that there can be no one hundred percent guarantee that people will not drink on the beach, regardless of where the beer is purchased. Mr. Dowling said that Robert's Liquor store has been in existence for approximately fifty years. He said that the applicant is willing to cooperate, and he also wants to prevent drinking on the beach. Mr. Dowling further noted that downtown businesses are not doing very well at this time; therefore, such a condition would not be fair, especially since this business has been there for so long. Mr. Dowling, in response to a question from Chmn. Ingell regarding whether the imposition of this condition has hurt his business, explained that the applicant is still selling single containers of beer. He said that the beer sales comprise a very small percentage of total sales; however, many people do come in to purchase two or three cans of beer, rather than an entire six-pack. They then take the beer home to drink it He said that many import beers are sold only in single containers. He noted that the applicant has a language difficulty, and it would be hard for him to try to explain to people why they cannot purchase single containers. Wilma Burt, 1152 7th Street, opposed all single -container sales of all alcoholic beverages anywhere in the City. She noted that there are 85 liquor establishments in the City, which is a tremendous number. She felt that single containers are invitations to be consumed in public places. She felt that the Planning Commission should consider amending the ordinance to prohibit single -container sales of all alcoholic beverages in the City, stating that it would be a good first step in eliminating drunk driving and trash. She did not feel it would be appropriate to allow single sales just because the applicant has a language problem. She stressed that single -container sales cause too many problems. Mr. Dowling stated that it would be more fair to require that all liquor stores have the same conditions imposed on them; however, he did not agree that there should be such a condition because it is the responsibility of the police to enforce the requirements that there shall be no drinking in public places. Public Hearing closed at 7:39 P.M. by Chmn. Ingell. —/O P.C. Minutes 3/6/90 Mr. Schubach, in response to questions from Comm. Ketz, stated that this is the first liquor store to have a condition imposed prohibiting single -container sales of beer. He said that other older liquor stores which have been operating without CUP's will be coming in for conditional use permit approval in the future. Comm. Peirce felt that businesses should be able to sell what they want and make a profit; however, this business is adjacent to the beach, and there are three large parking lots near the store. He noted that Robert's had been operating without a CUP in the past. He felt that the recommendation by the Police Department is an alternative correction method rather than police agreement. Comm. Peirce stated that the Commission has an obligation to look at a business and its surroundings in relation to the rest of the City to represent the citizens. He noted that there is definitely a problem with people consuming single containers of beer and its attendant trash problems. He sympathized that foreign beer is sold only in single containers; however, the best interests of the City must be considered. For these reasons, he stated that he would vote against the requested amendment. Comm. Moore stated that no one would argue that alcohol is a major problem in society; however, he did not feel that the problem would be solved by prohibiting single -container sales of beer. He felt that single cans of beer sold in brown paper bags will probably be consumed on the street, in a car, or on the beach in the hopes that the police will not see it. He felt that prohibiting this store from selling single cans will not solve anything because there are too many other places where a single can could be purchased. He therefore stated that he would support the requested amendment. Chinn. Ingell, noting that the police had proposed an alternative, stated that he tended to support the amendment. He felt that it would be a burden on the applicant to prohibit single - container sales. especially since many imported brands are only sold individually. He felt that if there is a problem with single -container sales, the problem should be addressed by amending the code, not by penalizing one owner. He felt that such a condition would be a burden on the applicant's competitiveness in the market. He felt that requiring a sign to be posted would be a proper step in the right direction. Chmn. Ingell noted that Robert's Liquor has been operating for 50 years without a conditional use permit. Because the applicant complied with the City and requested a CUP, he did not think it would be appropriate to penalize him for his compliance. He stated, therefore, that he would support the amendment. Comm. Rue agreed with Comm. Moore's and Chinn. Ingell's comments, stating that it might be appropriate to study the ordinance since single -container sales are a problem. He pointed out, however, that beer is not the only problem, noting that mixed cocktails are also sold individually, as well as other types of alcoholic beverages. He stated that he supports the CUP amendment; however, he feels that the ordinance should be addressed since this is a City-wide problem. Comm. Ketz agreed that it would be unfair to penalize this one business. She felt that if there is to be a single -container sale prohibition, it should be City-wide. Comm. Moore stated that the proposed wording for the sign is so bureaucratic that no one will bother to read it. He therefore suggested that the wording be very clear, very short, and very concise so that people know exactly what the intent is. Comm. Peirce stated that everyone has agreed that single -container liquor sales is a problem. He felt that if such sales are allowed to continue, it sends a message that people can continue to drink on the beach, so long as they are not caught. To vote against this request would send a clear message that such activities will not be tolerated in the City. P.C. Minutes 3/6/90 Comm. Rue noted, however, that this request relates only to beer. He noted that many other alcoholic beverages are available in individual containers. Comm. Peirce stated that this involves not only an alcohol abuse issue. but also an atmosphere problem involving the types of people drinking in public. To let a known problem continue would not be appropriate. Comm. Moore suggested that a condition be added requiring that single cans be sold in a clear plastic bag with the name of the store printed on it. Comm. Rue noted that a letter had been received from a citizen asserting that the police are not enforcing the rules related to drinking in public. He questioned whether staff has discussed this matter with the police. Mr. Schubach stated that the City intends to enforce all its conditional use permits. He also stated that the police make every effort to cite people drinking in public. Chmn. Ingell, noting that he lives and works close to the beach area, stated that he has seen a tremendous improvement in the downtown area over the past five years. He said that the police have done a great job in curtailing problems in the area. He further stated that problems are not emanating from Robert's Liquor Store, but from other stores. MOTION by Comm. Moore, seconded by Chmn Ingell, to approve staffs recommendation, Resolution P.C. 90-20, eliminating the condition prohibiting the sale of single containers of beer at 74 Pier Avenue, Robert's Liquor, with the inclusion of two additional conditions: (1) to require that the sign shall be prominently placed in the store, and the precise wording of the sign, which shall be clear and concise, shall be drafted by staff. Such language shall contain large type and be in plain language advising that Hermosa Beach vigorously enforces it liquor laws: and -(2) to require that single -container sales of beer shall be placed in clear packaging, allowing clear visibility of the product even though it is in a container. AYES: Comms. Ketz, Moore, Rue, Chmn. Ingell NOES: Comm. Peirce ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Mr. Dowling stated that the applicant feels all liquor stores should be required to adhere to the same condition. MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by Chinn. Ingell, to direct staff to study the issue of what other cities are doing in regard to single -container sales of alcoholic beverages No objections; so ordered. Chinn. Ingell suggested that the issue of packaging of alcoholic beverages also be studied. TEXT = DMENT REGARDING SEVENTEEN -FOOT PARKING SETB f!AND CONSIDERATIO ' THE ELIMINATION OF SETBACK REQUIREMENT F ALLEYS AND ADOPTION OF THE 1 •ONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARA (CONTINUED FROM MEE1ING OF FEBR ARY Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated Febru : , 990. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the propo = : resolution reco se .. : • ' • g adoption of the subject text amendment. of December 12, 1989, the City Council directed staff to prep.i - . . interim ce which would waive the 17 -foot setback requirement for garages if four p P.C. Minutes 3/6/90' 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 90-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AS AMENDED, AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO ALLOW OFF -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE AT 74 PIER AVENUE "ROBERT'S LIQUOR" AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 14, BLOCK 12, TRACT 4340, HERMOSA BEACH WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 3, 1990, to receive oral and written testimony regarding an application for a Conditional Use Permit, and on March 6, 1990, heard testimony regarding an amendment to the conditions established on January 3, 1990, and made the following findings: A. The sale of general alcoholic beverages is being conducted in an existing establishment already licensed by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control; B. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding uses; C. Strict compliance with the conditions of approval will mitigate any negative impact resulting from the issuance of the conditional use permit; D. Prohibiting the sale of single containers of beer as required in the original C.U.P. does not contribute significantly toward alleviating drinking and litter problems and would cause undue harm on the business; D. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby approve a Conditional Use Permit and Negative Declaration to allow the sale of general alcoholic beverages at 74 Pier Avenue subject to the following conditions: 1. The hours of operation shall be limited to 8:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M. daily. 2. The establishment shall not adversely affect the welfare of residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. The business shall provide adequate management and supervisory techniques to prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business or in the immediate area. Alcoholic beverages shall only be sold to individuals over the age of 21 years old, and violations of this condition may result in revocation and /or a citation. 5. Signs shall be posted conspicuously and prominently at all exits and all check-out stands warning patrons who purchase any and all types of alcoholic beverages that "possession and/or consumption of alcoholic beverages in any public sidewalk, parking lot, beach, and/or any public place is prohibited by law and subject to citation and fine. The City of Hermosa Beach vigorously enforces its liquor laws" Said signs shall be at least 12" X 14", shall be printed in a large type, permanently maintained, and shall be posted in visible locations. A minimum lettering size shall be established by the Planning Director and the Police Department and shall be utilized on the signs. 6. When single containers of beer are sold to customers they shall be placed in a clear package, allowing clear visibility of the product. 7. An employee who is aware of the conditions of this conditional use permit shall be on the premises during business hours. a. All employees shall be given a copy of the conditional use permit and shall acknowledge by signature that the conditional use permit has been read and understood.' 8. Adult magazine "R -Rated" shelf shall be located behind the counter, not accessible to minors. 9. There shall be no sale of sexually explicit "X -Rated" magazines, unless a conditional use permit isobtained, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 10. There shall be no sale of sexually explicit "X -Rated" video tapes, unless a conditional use permit is obtained, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 11. Clearly visible signs prohibiting loitering, littering, consumption of alcohol on the premises shall be posted in conspicuous location. 12. Measures shall be taken to control loitering on the public sidewalk at all times. 13. The exterior of the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner at all times. 14. The signs on the windows shall comply with the City Sign Ordinance. 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 15. Any violation of the conditions and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code shall be grounds for an immediate revocation hearing and/or citation. 16. The police chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists and may require the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel paid by the business. 17. Any changes to the exterior or interior design shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. 18. Prior to the conditional use permit being in effect, the applicant shall submit to the planning department, a signed and notarized "Acceptance of Conditions" form. 19. A conditional use permit shall be recorded with the deed, and proof of recordation shall be submitted with the planning department. 20. The Planning Commission may review the conditional use permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. 21. This resolution supersedes P.C. Resolution 90-2 VOTE: AYES: Comms.Ketz,Moore,Rue,Chmn.Ingell NOES: Comm.Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 90-20 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the C'ty of Hermosa Beach, California at their regul r mee ng f r ch 6, 1990.-/l/7- V-7441/ c t In ellhairman Michael Schubach, Secretary 4,3_, Date A/pers74 1 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 90-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO ALLOW OFF -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE AT 74 PIER AVENUE "ROBERT'S LIQUOR" AND. LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 14, BLOCK 12, TRACT 4340, HERMOSA BEACH WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 3, 1990, to receive oral and written testimony regarding an application for a Conditional Use Permit and made the following findings: A. The sale of general alcoholic beverages is being conducted in an existing establishment already licensed by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control; B. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding uses; C. Strict compliance with the conditions of approval will mitigate any negative impact resulting from the issuance of the conditional use permit; D. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby approve a Conditional Use Permit and Negative Declaration to allow the sale of general alcoholic beverages at 74 Pier Avenue subject to the following conditions: 1. The hours of operation shall be limited to 8:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M. daily. 2. The establishment shall not adversely affect the welfare of residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 3. The business shall provide adequate management and supervisory techniques to prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business or in the immediate area. 4. Alcoholic beverages shall only be sold to individuals over the age of 21 years old, and violations of this condition may result in revocation and /or a citation. a. Sale of single containers of beer, in a can or bottle, shall be prohibited. 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5. Signs shall be posted in a conspicuous location warning patrons of the illegality of open alcohol containers in any. public sidewalk parking lot and beach. 6. An employee who is aware of the conditions of this conditional use permit shall be on the premises during business hours. a. All employees shall be given a copy of the conditional use permit and shall acknowledge by signature that the conditional use permit has been read and understood. 7. Adult magazine "R -Rated" shelf shall be located behind the counter, not accessible to minors. 8. There shall be no sale of sexually explicit "X -Rated" magazines, unless a conditional use permit is obtained, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 9. There shall be no sale of sexually explicit "X -Rated" video tapes, unless a conditional use permit is obtained, as. required by the Zoning Ordinance. 10. Clearly visible signs prohibiting loitering, littering, consumption of alcohol on the premises shall be posted in conspicuous location. 11. Measures shall be taken to control loitering on sidewalk at all times. 12. The exterior of the premises shall be maintained and clean manner at all times. 13. The signs on the windows shall comply with the Ordinance. the public in a neat City Sign 14. Any violation of the conditions and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Codeshall be grounds for an immediate revocation hearing and/or citation. 15. The police chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists and may require the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel paid by the business. 16. Any changes to the exterior or interior design shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. 17. Prior to the conditional use permit being in effect, the applicant shall submit to the planning department, a signed and notarized "Acceptance of Conditions" form. 18. A conditional use permit shall be recorded with the deed, and proof of recordation shall be submitted with the planning department. 19. The Planning Commission may review the conditional use permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new 2 3 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Ketz,Moore,Peirce,Chmn.Rue NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm.Ingell CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 90-2 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of January 3a 1990. Ad 10e Rue, Chairman 'Michael Schubach, Secretary A/pers74 water drainage system to be installed, Mr. Otte explained that onl biodegradable detergents and waxes are used with nothing else added o t*water. A water reclamation system, approved by the County of os Ange es, is installed in areas where water conservation is a ajor issue. It is a more expensive system to use and maintain, mainly ,ecause contami ation builds up in the tanks and the sewer connectio s which have to cleaned on a regular basis, however, it is very eff ctive and the water \s safe enough to use over again. This system is •t required by the coun for all areas. Public hearing closed by Chmn. Rue at 8:31 p.m. Comm. Peirce summized the three'major areas of co foot pole sign, wh'ch he felt was too much sig staff's recommendati to eliminate it; 2) the the car wash, which he felt should be determine Pacific Coast Highway; .nd, 3) the noise ge which he felt needed furt - r study in order t on allowable noise levels. cern as: 1) the 45 ge and agreed with ours of operation for by the traffic flow on erated by the car wash, set adequate restrictions Comm. Ketz concurred with C. . Peirge about the need for special attention on the noise levels ge.erated/and what restrictions to impose. She asked if staff would be able o measure the noise levels first hand to ensure that everything was with'. range. She also felt that the pole sign should be lower. Mr. Schubach replied the City was in the process of training staff members on meter reading, but an actual tudy needs to be performed to determine the ambient noise level. Comm. Peirce said that he would prefer a continuance of this item until a noise study could performed. Mr. Schubach informed the Commission that a noise tudy should only take one to two weeks to conduct, and this item could be ack before them for the first meeting in February. MOTION by Comet. Peirce,seconded by Comm. Moore, to con inue this item to the first regularly scheduled meeting in February, Feb nary 6, 1990. This continuance will allow the applicant time to receive a.completed noise study from a licensed acoustical engineer. No objections; so ordered,: Chmn.: Rue asked that staff also supply any information that cold be obtained from a similar project located at Manhattan Beach Boulevar and Aviation in the city of Redondo Beach. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OFF -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 74 PIER AVENUE, ROBERT'S LIQUOR. PC 01/03/90 Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated December 19, 1989. This project is located in the C-2 zone, with a.general plan designation of general commercial. The present use is as general alcohol (off -sale). Robert's Liquor is an existing store which has been in business for at least 20 years, and is one of eight Packaged Liquor Stores which are being operated as an off -sale alcohol beverage establishment without a Conditional Use Permit. In following the amortization ordinance, Roberts Liquor was notified to apply for a permit for its business activities. In the past five years only minor security infractions or disturbances have been reported, along with one report of selling sexually explicit material to a minor. It is illegal in Hermosa Beach to sell sexually explicit material without a Conditional Use Permit to regulate the operation, however, under the current moratorium, Robert's Liquor cannot apply for this permit at this time. The police have requested a condition to prohibit the sale of single beers to help mitigate public drinking. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission approve the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Negative Declaration. Chmn. Rue asked if staff had fully explained the conditions of this Conditional Use Permit to the applicant. Mr Schubert replied that it should have been explained at the city counter, but that he personally had not spoken with the applicant. Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Rue at. 8:51 p.m. Mr. Sei Kim, 74 Pier Avenue, owner of Robert's Liquor, stated that he had no problem making any of the changes required to continue to operate under this Conditional Use Permit. Chmn. Rue asked if Mr. Kim understood the conditions imposed, and he replied in the positive. Comm. Peirce asked if there were presently any window signs at the store, and noted that an excess of these signs was illegal. Mr. Kim stated that he had two signs, and staff inspected the store and said that they were within the limits of Code. Mr. Schubach validated that statement, and noted that it was included in condition #13. He said that the signage would be checked on a regular basis. Chmn. Rue reminded Mr. Kim of the moratorium on the sale of X-rated material and the inability to obtain a Conditional Use Permit to da so at this time. PC 01/03/90 Public hearing closed by Chmn. Rue at 8:56 p.m. MOTION by Comm. Moore, seconded by Comm. Ketz, to approve the Conditional Use Permit and Negative Declaration. AYES: • Comms. Ketz, Moore, Pierce, Chmn. Rue NOES: None ABSTAIN: .None ABSENT: Comm. Ingell Chmn. Rue stated that this decision may be appealed by writing to the City Council within 10 days. Chmn. Rue called a brief recess at 8:57 p.m. The Commission reconvened at 9:07 p.m. with all attending members present and seated. PUBLIC HEARING WORKSHOP FOR DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PARKS AND RECREA .ON MASTER PLAN REVIEW Mr. Shubach gave staff report dated December 27, 1989. The City C Community Res future developm programs. This was to aide the City in ncil at their June 13, 1989 meeting reque ed that the urces Department prepare a Master Pla regarding the t of existing and future parks .nd recreational to be an objective study to supp facts and numbers e development of specific pr:grams and facilities. It appears, from the ove iew of the report, at the consultant relied heavily upon a survey dist buted city wid o determine current needs. Unfortunately, none of the atistical ..ta obtained was used and no projections were made for the ture. Mr. Schubach briefly addressed so p basic issues from the report for emphasis to the Commission, an. th turned the floor .over to the consultant for more detailed formatio •. The public hearing was op— ed by Chmn. Rue . 9:16 p.m. Meredith Kaplan, 219 consultant, stated t plan for the par report reflects and projectio of an imple No. Harbor Boulevard, at the report supplied to sta and recreation element of the ofessional judgement and residential for the future have been included for ntation plan. ullerton, recreation was merely a master neral Plan. This i••ut. Guidelines t development Comm. •ore noted several major problems with the repo The demog .phic survey had a very low response rate, and almos .all res••nses were received from the 45 year old home owner categ H osa Beach has a high concentration of young singles which haven - 2+ - PC 01/03/90 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH I, the undersigned, do declare under penalty of perjury that I did on the 9fr .day of _ , 199O , deposit into the United States Post Office, first class postage prepaid, a copy of the Public Notice attached as Exhibit "A" to each and every person attached as Exhibit "B". I warrant that the persons named on Exhibit "B" are all the persons required by applicable law to receive the Public Notice attached as Exhibit "A". I understand and agree that it is my responsibility to cause these Public Notices to be made in an aaccurate and timely fashion and agree to hold the City harmless against any liability whatsoever for any defect of said notice or notices. In the event an action is instituted in a court of competent jurisdiction which questions the legality of the Public Notices, then the City may in its exclusive discretion suspend all hearings or cause the cessation of any consturction or of any use which was permitted as a result of a hearing which was held on accordance with the Public Notice. In the event that the court declares the notice or noticing procedure to be effective, then the City may in its exclusive discretion revoke any permits granted and cause any approvals given pursuant to those Public Notices to be declared null and void and I agree on behalf of myself and my heirs, assigns or successors -in -interest to hold the City harmless in connection therewith. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. of I have executed this declaration on this the (s- day ,n,4Q l , 199C at Hermosa Beach, California. State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) SS ZZ Othis the0 anfJ day of /j,�� , 1990 , before me, ,� Lth'r/Cts ,�� the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared y42 /o7j/l and proved to me bn the basis of satisfactory evidence t be the person(s) whose name(s) /5 suscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. mhos ri2,4T, vE 47-6 E (Capacity) (SEAL) OFFICIAL SEAL LAURICE M. DUKE Notary Public • Calltnrnla PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN L A. COUNTY try Comm. Exp. Mar. 12. 1993 Roberts Liquor Sei C. Kim 74 Pier Ave. Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 Jan. 22, 1990 Hermosa Beach City Planning Department To Whom It May Concern: I am appealing the Planning Commission decision to limit my beer sales to exclude all single containers of beer. Roberts Liquor has been in the same location for over forty-five years. To suddenly restrict it by limiting its ability to sell alcoholic beverages is putting the burden of resopnsibility of drinking alcohol on the beach to the store owner and away from the police where the enforcement duties lie. It is unthinkable to punish one store owner and then think that there will be no alcohol on the beach. You only need to go to the nearest store and purchase it there or bring it from home or purchase any other form of alcohol that comes in small quantities, example, half pint of liquor. Solution: By having the police require each beach store owner to place a highly visible sign on the premises stating the police's intention of cracking down on alcoholic consumption on the beach. Thus, it brings a concerted effort on the part of both the police and store owner to work together on this problem. This would not only jeopardize a single store owner from earning his livelihood but also warn potential beer buyer that their drinking on the beach will not be tolerated. N 24- 'MO Sincerely yours, Sei C. Kim HERMOSA REAL ESTATE COMPANY 1001 HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-3421 February 28, 1990 Michael Schubach, Planning Director Members of the Planning Commission Hermosa Beach City Hall Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 I= FB 23 1990 Dear Planning Director Schubach and Planning Commissioners, I am writing in response to the public notice I received regarding Robert's Liquor's CUP amendment. I strongly oppose the sale of single containers of beer in the downtown area, from any source. It seems to me that the only uses for purchase of single bottles or cans of beer are for immediate consumption - on the beach, in a local restaurant without a beer/wine license, or outside in the streets or alleyways - all illegal uses. I own the commercial building at the northwest corner of Tenth and Hermosa Avenue, and I constantly clean up empty cans and bottles in the rear of my building. This amendment to Robert's CUP can only make matters worse. As a matter of fact, I would urge you to prohibit the sale of single cans anywhere in the city. The debris of cans and bottles, and the smell of urine at the rear of my building is an ongoing nuisance, even though I hire a maintenance company to sweep and hose the exterior of the property weekly. . Please do not allow the sale of single containers. Sincerely, Missy Sheldon ,%This petition consists of 184 names. The package of original petition including signatures is on file in Planning Dept. To H.B. City Council Member: April 6, 1990 H.B. City Council Member are appealing the decision made by Hermosa Beach City Planning Commission to allow Roberts Liquor to sell a single container of beer. On March 6, 1990, H.B. City Planning Commission allowed Roberts Liquor to sell a single containerof beer if two conditions were met: 1. One single beer is to be bagged into the clear plastic bag. 2. A well placed sign stating that alcohol consumption on the beach will not be tolerated by the H.B. Police Dept. Both of these conditions clearly restrict the consumption of alcohol on the beach. If Roberts Liquor is not allowed to sell a single container of beer, it is clear that those single cans of beer can easily be purchased elsewhere by walking one block, in either direction, from 6 different stores. It's also clear that Roberts Liquor is unfairly singled out. City Council Member is again attempting to throw another monkey wrench at downtown merchant. This petition is to show the support for Roberts Liquor and decision made by H.B. City Planning Commission on March 6, 1990. MERLE E. FISH, P H . D . TIIE STRAND IIERMOSA BEACH. CALIFORNIA 902:14 April 21, 1990 RECEIVED APR 24 1990 f Re: One can or bottle sale Hermosa Beach City Council: It has been brought to my attention that the Council is considering not enforcing the one bottle or one can sale of beer, wine, or liquor in the immediate Pier Avenue section of downtown. Statistics appear to indicate that when the one can or one bottle sale is curtailed in difficult areas that there is a decided decline or elimination of situations of civil disobedience, major and minor crimes and unsavory elements. If this is true,it seems that enforcing the law when each liquor license comes up for renewal would be one more step in keeping our community the kind of wholesome en- vironment you were all elected to uphold. Many of us in the commuity will be counting upon each of you to uphold the law and keep Hermosa the kind of community we all desire. Sincerely, Merle E. Fish., Jr. President, Hermosa Beach Coordinating Council Commissioner, Community Resources SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ,T ., April 2, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council . City Council Meeting of April 10, 1990 COMMUNITY CENTER REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES RECOt4MENDATION It is recommended by staff that Council receive and file this report. BACKGROUND The City Council's list of goals for this fiscal year includes an updated financial analysis of the Community Center facility (#12 on goals list). It is also an expressed desire of Council to take a look at the Civic Theatre income'versus revenue since its -renovation in 1984. The Community Center was purchased in 1978 for $650,000 from the School District with Housing and Urban Development Funds. Formerly serving as Pier Avenue School, the facility became a Community Center which was operated by a Community Center Department from 1979 to 1981. In 1 981 , the Parks and Recreation Department and the Community Center Department merged to become what is now titled the Community Resources Department. Community Center operation and programming is one responsibility of the Department in addition to programming and permitting activities throughout the rest of the City's parks, beaches and recreation facilities. The purchase of the Community Center was pursuant to deed restrictions stating that it is to be used solely for parks, recreation, open space, educational or other community purposes. Furthermore, the premises are not to be used for the purposes of an ongoing commercial enterprise. ANALYSIS For this report the Community Center will be examined financially from FY 1984-85 through FY 1989-90. This five year span was selected due to the fact that the Civic Theatre opened in February 1984. Not only will that enable Council to take a look at the Theatre; it will also show how the Center has done during a time period in which it has been fully operational. In order to frame this analysis, it was necessary for staff to make some assumptions (i.e., percentage of staff time dedicated to the Center versus other Department programs). These assumptions are listed for your review (attached). Additionally, the Civic Theatre has received a separate review for the purposes of clarity and distinction. Please see attachment. It is also noteworthy that the Community Center -1 Foundation has provided over $400,000 towards programming this facility since 1984 which is not included in this report (annual financial review and expenditure versus benefits analysis will be submitted to Council by the Foundation after the close of the fiscal year). From this analysis it is apparent that with the exception of FY 1998-89 in which the substantial CIP expenditure for the Civic Theatre air conditioning was made, the percentage of revenue as compared to expenditures has improved from year to year. As displayed in the attached graph, the revenue percentages have grown from 32% in FY 1984-85 to a projected 50% in FY 1989-90. The Civic Theatre ran a similar course with revenue percentages improving from 11% in FY 1984-85 to 59% this fiscal year. In any financial analysis of the Community Center, it is important to consider both the degree of subsidy provided to various organizations using the Center per Council directive (i.e., Youth Basketball, Historical Society); the office and storage space provided for the City staff in the Center and the value of the 112 -space public parking lot to the City. A current list of these types of activities/usages is provided. Where possible, FY 1989-90 values have been attached to the items. Some remain difficult to quantify and are listed for informational purposes only. Finally, of course it remains a priority consideration to acknowledge the contribution to the quality of life in Hermosa Beach this building has provided as a historical and aesthetically pleasing structure and as a center for community cultural, social service and recreational pursuits. A list of fiscal year 1989-90 Community Center tenants, renters and users (as of 3/90) is attached for your information. Attachments: Assumptions Community Center Revenues Community Center Expenditures Community Center Expenditures vs. Revenues (graph) Civic Theatre Expenditures Civic Theatre Expenditures vs. Revenues'(graph) List of Community Center Activities Concur: evin B. Nortraft City Manager Viki Coeland, Director Finance Department Respectfully submitted, Mary C. ney, Director Dept. of Community Resources An •ny Antich, Di actor Public Works De artment COMMUNITY CENTER REVENUE VS EXPENDITURES FISCAL YEARS 1984-85 THROUGH 1989-90 LIST OF ASSUMPTIONS Listed below are the assumptions used for the purpose of separating the Community Center operation from other Department responsibilities. Percentages by function were estimated for funds that were not solely designated to the Community Center: Community Resources Full Time Staff Function Percent of budget by function Community Center Operation/Programs 30% Civic Theatre Operation/Programs 10% Foundation Administration/ Staff Support 20% Parks and other Facilities . 5% Special Event Permits/ Recreation Programs 30% Department Administration 5% Community Resources Part Time Staff Function Percent of budget by function Community Center 60% Civic Theatre 15% Foundation Events 5% Special Events/Recreation Programs 20% Community Center Percentage of Budget Program Materials 10% Phone 60% Recreation Classes 80% Building Maintenance Category Community Center percent of total budget 65% 65% Personnel Equipment/Supplies Utilities Parks Maintenance Personnel at 24 man hours per month at $15 and $18 per hour Contract fees/equipment 8.4% of total. (lawn maintenance) *Not included in Community Center analysis. * * * COMMUNITY CENTER REVENUES FISCAL YEARS 1984-85 THROUGH 1989-90 FUND 84-85 85-86 86-87 87-88 88-89 89-90 (estimated 3/90) LEASES $43,105 $53,725 $51,216 $63,596 $75,617 $80,000 RENTALS 39,385 31,450 54,157 45,526 48,737 47,000 THEATRE 5,762 4,667 12,559 18,425 22,673 34,000 TENNIS CTS 7,312 5,718 11,987 11,419 10,845 10,000 REC. PROGRAMS -0- -0- -0- -0- 4,848 24,520 CLASSES TOTAL 495,564 $95,560 $129,919 $138,966 $162,720 $195,520 OTHER DEPT. REVENUE $43,600 $44,640 $64,878 $50,343 $61,170 $66,130 FUND COMMUNITY CENTER EXPENDITURES FISCAL YEARS 1984-85 THROUGH 89-90 (Includes Civic Theatre) 84-85 85-86 86-87 87-88 88-89 89-90 (estimated 3/90) FULL TIME $46,598 $55,076 $60,931 $83,582 $81,997 $97,198 STAFF OVERTIME -0- 131 262 811 288 1,200 VACATION/ 340 543 850 256 1,016 9,239 SICK PAY OFF ACCRUAL 883 418 439 5,197 1,231 3,485 CASH IN PART TIME 35,368 41,155 46,543 28,280 39,672 44,000 STAFF CONTRACT 3,518 -0- 1,700 4,100 11,500 28,000 SERVICES ADVERTISING 15,276 2,113 188 823 1,722 3,150 TELEPHONE 2,700 3,755 3,973 3,430 2,741 2,700 OFFICE OPER 4,498 '4,499 6,056 8,292 5,453 5,167 SUPPLIES PROGRAM 100 201 44 253 500 500 MATERIALS SPECIAL EVENTS -0- 2,800 2,600 3,000 -0- -0- EQUIPMENT/ 3,975 174 1,300 9,437 44,568 7,500 SUPPLIES FUND 84-85 85-86 86-87 87-88 88-89 89-90 (estimated 3/90) CIP'S 12,000 -0- 3,000 (cc/theatre) 42,000 (parking lot) (Building Maint) 88,000 (air cond) 10,000 (fire alarm) 7,000 (air cond) 4,500 (room renov) PUBLIC WORKS WORKS DEPT. BUILDING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 59,827 77,728 83,139 64,130 91,148 94,250 EQUIPMENT/ 57,694 55,819 59,312 58,227 59,201 58,500 SUPPLIES/ UTILITIES PARKS MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 4,320 4,320 4,320 4,320 5,184 Y 5,184 EQUIPMENT/ SUPPLIES/ CONTRACTS 7,152 7,528 7,924 8,341 8,780 9,228 TOTAL $296,249 $256,260 $282,581 $282,479 $443,001 $390,801 Expenditures Hermosa Beach Community Center Revenues Expenditures vs.Revenues Fiscal Years 1984-85 thru 1989-90 $500,000 $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 $50,000 $296,249 $256,260 1984-1985 282,581 19851986 ' 1986-1987 $282,479 1987-1988 $443,001 1988-1989 1989-1990 CIVIC THEATRE EXPENDITURES FISCAL YEARS 1984-85 THROUGH 89-90 NOTE: The Hermosa Civic Theatre opened in February, 1984 following a refurbishment funded by $306,880 in CDBG Funds and $253,128 of General Funds. FUND 84-85 85-86 86-87 87-88 88-89 89-90 (estimated 3/90) FULL TIME $ 7,766 $ 9,179 $10,931 $13,582 $13,666 $16,200 STAFF OVERTIME -0- 30 44 135 48 200 VACATION/ 57 91 142 43 169 1,540 SICK PAY OFF ACCRUAL 137 70 73 866 205 581 CASH IN PART TIME 6,632 7,717 8,727 5,303 7,439 8,250 STAFF CONTRACT 1,200 -0- 1,700 4,100 4,500- 5,000 SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS 1,500 2,500 1,260 1,400 -0- -0- EQUIPMENT/ ' 3,975 -0- •-0- 5,893 37,574 3,100 SUPPLIES CIP!S 20,014 0 -0- -0- 88,000 7,000 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. BUILDING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 5,983 7,773 8,314 6,413 9,115 9,425 FUND EQUIPMENT/ SUPPLIES UTILITIES 84-85 5,769 85-86 5,582 86-87 5,931 87-88 88-89 89-90 (estimated 3/90) 5,823 5,920 5,850 TOTAL $53,033 $32,942 $37,122 $43,558 $166,636 $57,146 Expenditures ' Revenues $500,000 $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 Hermosa Beach Civic Theatre Expenditures vs.Revenues Fiscal Years 1984-85 thru 1989-90 1984-1985 1985-1986 ' 1986-1987 1987-1988 1988-1989 1989-1990 1989-90 SUBSIDIZED ACTIVITIES/CITY USES HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER ESTIMATED RENTALS/LEASES VALUE OF SUBSIDY/USAGE Hermosa Beach Youth Basketball (Gym) $13,545 Civic Group/City Meetings: 14,400 Sister Cities, Little League, AYSO, Chamber of Commerce, Foundation, Youth Basketball, Dispute Resolution Services, Commission, Friends of the Arts, School Attendance Review Board, City department meetings, Civil Service testing. *School District/Theatre Use 625 Hiistorical Society Lease 7,680 Dispute Resolution Services Lease (50% subsidy) 888 Miscellaneous Fee Waivers per Commission/ 500 Council *Per Article 4 in Agreement with School District: OTHER Office Space at $.74 sq. ft. X 3,246 sq. ft. $28,824 Community Resources Staff Public Works Staff Storage Space City Hall X 1000 sq. ft./mo. Volunteer hours at $10 per hr. 600 hrs per yr. Total BENEFITS (No dollar value attached) 112 Parking Spaces Park/Open Space Usage 8,880 6,000 $81,342 FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 COMMUNITY CENTER ACTIVITIES TO DATE (3/90) COMMUNITY CENTER MEETING ROOMS Hope Chapel Community Center Foundation Community Center Advisory Commission Friends of the Arts (FOTA) Teen Advocate Chamber of Commerce Tim Magnus Karate Pre/Post Exercise SuperKids Gym 1736 Family Crisis Center Youth Basketball Summer Park Program After School Activity Program Joint Efforts Walking Club Theatre Arts Conservatory, Inc. Spring Classes Bishop Montgomery High School Fall classes SARB Counseling Sold on Soul Blues Concert Sand & Strand Run Meeting American Youth Soccer Organization IMA Classic Theatre Series H. B. Jay Cee's Patti Dance Recital COMMUNITY CENTER GYMNASIUM Colen Basketball ARC General Services Cascio Basketball DeMoss Basketball Artiano Basketball Andre Soccer Friedman Basketball Botelho Basketball Meistrell Basketball Easter Seals SuperKids Summer Park Program Petricelli Basketball Gawlowski Basketball Yoshioka Basketball Digiacomo Basketball T. Magnus Karate Sister Cities William Basketball Cohen Basketball Jazzercise Friday. A.A. -13 - Historical Society H. B. School District H. B. Personnel Young Actors Workout :IDS Financial Services Project Return Sister Cities H. B. Police Dept. Endriski Dance Adult Mediation H. B. Little League Audio Sweet Productions M & M Production Hugo Ugolini concert Back -N -Motion Dispute Resolution No More Diets Frank Unzueta - "Alama" Ozzie Cadena concert Los Cancioneros Concert KLON Jazz concert Consumer Network Seminar Columbia Picture Filming Eckhart Seeber Concert H. B. Boy Scouts COMMUNITY CENTER LEASES Easter Seals Project Touch Hope Chapel Teen Advocate Center Dispute Resolution Historical Society Assoc. for Retarded Citizens (ARC) South Bay Hospital Dist. (South Bay Center for Counseling) Low VolleyBall McConnel Volleyball Barry O'Gawa Volleyball After School Activity Program Hermosa Beach School District Reception COMMUNITY CENTER THEATRE Hope Chapel HBCC Task Force Palos Verdes Bible Church Comm. Center Summer Classes Audio Sweet Productions Summer Park Program Frank Unzueta - "Alma" Children Theatre Workshop Ozzie Cadena Concerts Video Summer Blast Sold on Soul Blues Concert International Bilingual School Listen to Learn Recovery Resources Group Warren Miller Ski Show Los Cancioneros Fall Program Classes IMA Concerts Columbia Pictures Hugo Concerts Shattered Secrets Bishop Montgomery High School Christmas Concerts Theatre Arts Conservatory, Inc. Council on Sexual Addiction Sandpipers Project Touch Spring Program Classes KLON Radio Jazz Concert Mary Mae Cioffi Patti Joy South Bay Union High School Graduation Community Center Foundation Youth Basketball Closing Ceremonies For sports enthusiasts, the. Center has athletic facilities available for everyone's pursuit of fitness. Six tennis courts, operated by a tennis professional, are part of the Community Center complex. Inside the complex is a gymnasium and dance studio. All facilities are available to the public on, an hourly rental basis. Need a meeting room for that seminar or class? Come to the Center. The Center is boastful of several different sized meeting rooms also available to the public on an hourly rental basis. In addition, the Center leases office space to non-profit organizations. Are you a non-profit agency? We'll be glad to talk with you about your office space needs. 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 376-6984, ext. 280 (213) 379-3312 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 318-3452 Please call the above listed numbers for information regarding the entire Community Center operation including rental/lease rates Foundation programs, concerts, athletic events, and the myriad of other activities that take place in the Center. - • . - _ - 4),r Welcome to the Hermosa Beach Community Center. Built in 1935 as the Pier Avenue School, it has survived a major earthquake, reconstruction as a WPA project during the Great Depression, the threat of demolition by developers, a featured position as the doomed high school in the classic horror film Carrie, and the smooth transition from school building to Community Center. Since its dedication in 1979, hundreds of thousands of South Bay residents have used the Center as a focal point for recreational, cultural, social service and educational activities._ Afters school `. programs, art exhibits;' adult L yotii basketball leagues, tennis, JOS leagues, extendededucio and a myriad of`othe been offered t 'the the Center. Civic Theatre The jewel in the Community Center is, of course, the Civic Theatre. Dominating the facility on the east side, the theatre was the first project of the city's remodeling effort. The Civic Theatre has been beautifully restored in the Art Deco style. This elegant 500 -seat facility was completed in the winter of 1984, and opened with a black tie benefit featuring Mel Torme in concert. From the beginning, the theatre has been a success hosting everything from town meetings and visiting ballet companies to childrens theatre and fashion shows. The theatre is as functional as it is elegant, and not a season passes without further technical improvements. Thetheatre is available to the public for theatrical productions, recitals, ctur„es, $cq'ncerts, etc., on an hourly Community Center Foundation This new and exciting organization's single purpose is to raise funds for the continued growth and expansion of the Community Center both in programs and capital improvements. The Foundation„. sponsors an annual Gala Fundraiseras well as theatrical and athletiep ro amsw and events. I —'` 4 Supporting they Foundatiaprovides a direct tax deductiblle wjy to underscore your support for the Community Center's continued development. Want to be a part of this? Come by the Center anytime, meet the staff, and see what's going on. The staff will be glad to give you the grand "nickle and dime” tour of the facility including the splendid new theatre. Those who can donate time and money are always needed, of course.', But all those interested in what's going on at the Community Center are needed, too. Take part in our programs and activities. This Center, once so badly in disrepair and an eyesore, has now become a source of pride to the City of Hermosa Beach. Come see why. April. 2, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council City Council Meeting of April 10, 1990 RECOMMENDATION TO INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO HANDBILLS AND ADVERTISING RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council introduce the attached ordinance. BACKGROUND: On August 14, 1984, Council adopted an ordinance regulating the distribu- tion of handbills and advertising matter making it unlawful to distribute any printed or written advertising matter by placing it upon automobiles, porches, yards, or other public or private property. On October 10, 1987, the Council directed the Police Department to begin more stringent enforcement of the Handbill Ordinance due to the large amount of litter that was being created. On October 27, 1987, the City Attorney rendered an opinion regarding the enforcement of the Handbill Ordinance indicating that there may be consti- tutional questions about the legality of our ordinance. ANALYSIS: Following numerous complaints from Councilmembers and other citizens, the Police Department began an aggressive enforcement effort aimed at reducing the amount of litter caused by the distribution of the various handbills. This effort included stopping all persons who were passing the handbills and sending warning letters to the establishments doing the advertising. Cases were filed against establishments that continued to distribute the handbills after numerous warnings. In November 1989, attorneys for the establishments were successful in obtaining opinions that our ordinance was invalid. The City Prosecutor instructed the Police Department to cease and desist in the enforcement of the Ordinance as it related to distribution of handbills on vehicles and in the neighborhoods. In order to have some regulation on the distribution, staff conducted research and met with several attorneys in order to develop an ordinance that would meet the constitutional requirements and be enforceable. 1 Some of the differences between this new ordinance and the ordinance it replaces are: * Persons are not entirely restricted from distributing handbills but there are provisions that require the handbills to be secured in place by a rubber band, designed to hang on a doorknob, or other method to prevent it from falling to the ground and becoming litter. * It allows citizens to post their property and makes it illegal for persons to distribute handbills on posted property. In addition to the Handbill problem, the issue of all of the various signs and advertisement being placed on public and utility property surfaced. In order to properly address and regulate this continuing problem, specific sections making this activity unlawful and providing for fees for removal have been developed and included. The fees established are based on calculations of average salary for city employees to remove the signs, track down and bill the responsible party, and subsequent overhead costs such as mailing fees, telephone usage, paper supplies, materials necessary to remove signs, and vehicle expense. The City of Los Angeles recently adopted a similar ordinance and established fees of $190.40 for the first sign; $1.60 for each additional sign; and $48.50 for each sign glued or pasted. Concur: Kevin B. orthcra'ft, City Manager Viki Copeland, Director of Finance 2 Resully S t m jtted, Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 90 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE WHICH SAID CHAPTER RELATES TO ADVERTISING. WHEREAS, Section 3-1, relating to distribution of handbills and advertising matter, was adopted by the City Council as Ordinance 84-771, effective August 14, 1984; and WHEREAS, Public and utility property continues to be used as a free form of advertising; and WHEREAS, The placement and distribution of handbills, signs and advertising matter on public and private property creates litter, visual pollution; and WHEREAS, Many citizens object to the placement of handbills, signs and advertising matter on their property; and WHEREAS, The City Council desires to reduce these blighted conditions and address the citizens concerns; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Chapter 3, Section 3-1, of the Hermosa Beach Muncipal Code, titled "Advertising",shall be amended to read as follows: SECTION 3-1. HANDBILL DEFINED. " Handbill," for the purposes of this chapter, includes any printed or written advertising matter, any sample or device, dodger, circular, leaflet, pamphlet, newspaper, paper, booklet or any other printed matter or literature. SECTION 3-1.1 DISTRIBUTION - ON PUBLIC PROPERTY. (a) It is unlawful for any person, either directly or indirectly, to depo- sit, place, throw, scatter or cast any handbill in or on any public thoroughfare, park, ground or other public place within the city. The pro- visions of this section shall not be deemed to prohibit the handing, transmitting or distributing of any handbill to any person willing to accept the handbill. // // // // 1 (b) No person who distributes any handbill on a public sidewalk or in a 2 public park shall neglect to remove any handbill which is distributed by that person or another person also distributing copies of the same 3 handbill, which handbill is then thrown, cast or deposited on the ground by another person within one hundred feet from the location of the particular 4 distribution by said person. 5 SECTION 3-1.2 DISTRIBUTION - ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. (a) No person shall distribute, deposit, throw, place or attach any 6 handbill to, in or upon any porch, yard, steps, door or mail -box located upon any premises not in the possession of or under the control of the per - 7 son distributing the said handbill, which premises has posted thereon in a conspicuous place, a sign of at least twelve inches in area bearing the 8 words, "No Advertising," unless the person distributing the handbills has first received the written permission of the person occupying or having 9 possession of such premises authorizing him to do so. (b) It is unlawful for any person, either directly or indirectly, to 10 distribute, deposit or place any handbill in or upon any private yard, door, steps, porch, or any other private property unless the handbill is 11 firmly secured in place by a rubber band or is designed to hang securely on a doorknob in order to prevent the handbill from falling to the ground and 12 creating litter. (c) The provisions of this section shall not be deemed to prohibit the 13 placing of a political handbill, a religious handbill, or a newspaper on the door or in front of and immediately adjacent to the door of any private 14 residence. 15 SECTION 3-1.3 DISTRIBUTION - ON VEHICLES. It is unlawful for any person either directly or indirectly, to distribute, deposit or place any 16 handbill in or upon any automobile or other vehicle unless the handbill is firmly secured in place to prevent the handbill from falling to the ground 17 and creating litter. 18 SECTION 3-1.4 HOURS OF DISTRIBUTION. It is unlawful for any person to distribute any handbills between the hours of five p.m. of any day and 19 eight a.m. of the following day. 20 SECTION 3-1.5 HANDBILLS, SIGNS - ON PRIVATE BUILDINGS AND WALLS. It is unlawful for any person to paint, mark, write on, post, or otherwise 21 affix or attach any handbill or sign to or upon any building, wall or part thereof, or upon any private property without the consent of the owner, 22 agent or occupant thereof. 23 SECTION 3-1.6 HANDBILLS, SIGNS - ON PUBLIC PLACES AND OBJECTS. It is unlawful for any person to paint, mark, write on, post, or otherwise affix 24 or attach any handbill or sign to or upon any sidewalk, crosswalk, curb, curbstone, street lamp post, fence, barrier, barricade, hydrant, tree, 25 shrub, tree stake or guard, electric light or power or telephone or telegraph pole or upon any drinking fountain, street sign, traffic sign, 26 phone booth, or any other public property or private utility property. 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 3-1.7 HANDBILLS, SIGNS - REMOVAL OF, COSTS. (a) Any handbill or sign found posted or otherwise affixed upon any public or utility property contrary to the provisions of this section may be removed by any company, utility, organization, or individual owning or responsible for maintaining that property, or any employee of the City. (b) For the purposes of this subsection, there shall be a presumption that: (1) the person listing property for sale, lease or rent is the person responsible for posting a sign advertising the property for sale, lease or rent; (2) the candidate seeking office is the person responsible for posting a sign promoting the candidate for public office; (3) the person in charge of property used for a yard or garage sale is the person responsible for posting a sign advertising a yard or garage sale; (4) the owner of pro- perty used for a commercial activity or event is the person responsible for posting a sign advertising the subject commercial activity or event; (5) the person whose name, telephone number or address appears as the sponsor of an activity or event is the person responsible for posting a sign adver- tising the subject activity or event; and (6) the person whose name, telephone number or address appears as the person to contact on any hand- bill or sign posted is the person responsible for having posted the same. (c) For purposes of this subsection, the person presumed to be responsible for posting a handbill or sign on public or utility property may rebut such presumption by declaring under penalty of perjury or swearing under oath that the person did not cause, authorize, allow or permit the posting of the sign on public or utility property. (d) Nothing in this section shall apply to the painting of house numbers upon curbs done in accordance with regulations of the City. (e) Nothing in this section shall prohibit the installation of signs on public or utility property provided the sign is a part of a program spon- sored by a City Department and such signs and locations are approved prior to installation and provided such signs are removed after their purpose is served. SECTION 3-1.8 CHARGES FOR REMOVAL OF HANDBILLS AND SIGNS. (a) The person responsible for any illegal posting contrary to the provisions of this section shall be liable for the cost incurred in the removal and billin thereof, and the Finance Department is authorized to effect the collection of said cost incurred by the City of Hermosa Beach. (b) A service charge'of $20.00 shall be levied for removal of the first handbill or sign regardless of size. (c) A service charge of $1.50 shall be levied for each additional sign removed. (d) An additional service charge of $5.00 shall be levied for each sign that is attached or affixed using glue or paste. SECTION 3-1.9 FEES AND CHARGES CONSTITUE A VALID AND SUBSISTING DEBT. (a) All fees and charges levied by the City pursuant to this section shall be due and payable upon presentation of a written invoice. (b) All fees and charges for such services pursuant to this section shall constitue a valid and subsisting debt in favor of the City and against the person responsible for posting or affixing the handbill or sign to public or utility property. If an amount remains unpaid after reasonable and practical attempts have been made by the City to obtain payment, a civil action may be filed with the appropriate court for the amount due and payable, together with any penalties, and related charges and fees accrued due to non payment, and all fees and charges required to file and pursue such civil action. // // 3 1 SECTION 3-1.10 VIOLATION, PENALTY. Any person violating any provi- 2 sions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor. 3 SECTION 2. That This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full 4 force and operation thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption. 5 SECTION 3. That prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after 6 the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be 7 published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation 8 published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner pro - 9 vided by law. 10 SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and 11 adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original 12 ordinances of said City, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption 13 thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the 14 same is passed and adopted. 15 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 1990. 16 17 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR 18 of the City of Hermosa Beach, California 19 ATTEST: 20 21 City Clerk 22 23 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 24 25 City Attorney 26 // 27 // 1/ 28 // 1/ April 16, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council April 24, 1990 PROSPECT SCHOOL HOUSE RECOMMENDATION The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission requests redirection from Council about the future of the Prospect School House located adjacent to Prospect Park. on 6th and Prospect. Staff recommends that determining an appropriate use for Prospect School be delayed until £114ch time the Commission can determine its relative priority among other projects per the Master Plan. BACKGROUND At the January 10, 1989, Councilmeeting, the Commission was directed to determine how to restore the old Prospect School utilizing volunteer services; establishing costs; determining the scope of the project and estimating time frames. In response to this request, the Commission formed a special committee comprised of two Commissioners and three community members (see attached roster) to investigate alternative uses for the building. The committee proceeded by evaluating the condition of the building and requesting funding from Council to bring it into a' workable condition (see attached). This funding was denied by Council Subsequent to this decision, the Master Plan study for Parks and Recreation was initiated. At that time, the Commission determined that the committee should wait for the completion of the Master Plan before pursuing the project any further. ANALYSIS With the Master Plan completed and approved by Council, the Prospect School issue remains unresolved. No solid recommendation for its use was made (see attached) by the Plan other than general community needs which are reflected throughout the report. The. Commission is now faced with the task of prioritizing and implementing this Plan which consists of numerous issues and proposed facility upgrades. In light of the other areas the Commission needs to be concerned with, if it is the Council's desire to reinstate the Prospect School House Committee, the Commission requests a financial commitment on the part of the City to bring the building to a remotely usable condition. Alternatives available to Council include: 1) Direct the Commission to reinstate the Prospect School House Committee. Provide funding for basic repairs. 2) Demolish building (prior recommendation from the Commission denied by Council). 3) Request that the Commission address this potential project along with others indicated in the Master Plan and determine its priority as compared with other projects/objectives. If it is the Council's desire to retain this building, staff recommends the third alternative be selected. Clearly, the building requires funding in order to put it to any kind of use. At this time, the Community Center and Clark Building seem to adequately address the meeting room needs of the City. With the limited funds that are available, it would seem more appropriate to pay for the upkeep and repair of facilities currently in operation and (short of doing what is necessary to insure that the school building is not a safety hazard) to delay pouring dollars and efforts into Prospect School until its use and priority per the Master Plan can be determined. A list of potential uses for the building as determined by the committee is attached. Task Force Roster Letter of request to Commission Council agenda item "Repair Work" (6/27/89) and Council Minutes Master Plan evaluation List of potential uses Concur: Kevin B. North City Manager Respect a ly submitted, AhAWAW AIEWAri Mary C /"gooney, Director Dep'. of Community Resources CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA PROSPECT SCHOOL TASK FORCE JERRY COMPTON STEVE CRECY JULIUS (JR) REVICZKY GINNY SHOREN EDIE WEBBER MARY C. ROONEY City Liaison 832 - 7th St. Hermosa Beach, 90254 1148 - 2nd Street Hermosa Beach, 90254 600 Ardmore Ave. Hermosa Beach, 90254 1210 - 7th Place Hermosa Beach, 90254 1201 - 11th Street Hermosa Beach, 90254 710 Pier Ave. Hermosa Beach, 90254 Res. 372-6151 Bus. 379-8222 Res. 379-2316 Bus. 618-5927 Res. 379-6267 Res. 372-9089 Res. 374-6552 Bus. 318-0280 zmummesmomum VY April 19, 1989 City of dierm osarl3eacl� Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Community Resources Commission % Steve Crecy, Chairman. 710 Pier Ave.. Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 Commissioners: The committee members of the Old Hermosa Schoolhouse Project have opened discussions about what to do with the Prospect School Building. While there are some viable suggestions about its potential uses and while we are willing to raise funds to help "fix" the facility, we would request the assistance of the City in taking care of some of the structural repairs that have resulted from neglect in long-term maintenance of the building. Specifically, we would request the Commission's assistance in asking City Council to,allocate funds and labor necessary to accomplish the following tasks: Re -roofing Replace broken windows Clean-up overgrown areas (exterior) Remove trash and debris Restore lighting/electrical service We believe that if the City takes responsibility for restoring the building to a "reasonable" condition, this committee, -and interested citizens can begin focusing energies and funds on upgrading the site for its selected use. We hope you will understand and.support our request. We feel certain if this venture is a cooperative one, that we can restore the school house and (at the same time) create a new and exciting facility for Hermosa Beach. Thank you in advance for your help. Sincerely, J. R. Reviczky, Chai erson Old Hermosa Schoolhouse Project Committee Members: Jerry Compton, Steve Crecy, Ginny Shoren, Edie Webber y June 15, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of June 27, 1989 APPROVAL OF INITIAL REPAIR WORK TO. OLD PROSPECT SCHOOL RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission the City Council approve the replacement of the roof of the Old Prospect School and direct staff to proceed with a formal bid process for this project and appropriate $14,000 from the Parks and Recreation Facility Tax Fund into CIP #89-604. BACKGROUND At the January 10, 1989, Council meeting the City Council directed the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission to determine how to restore the old Prospect School utilizing volunteer services, establishing costs, determining scope of project and estimating time frames. A task force was formed at the Commission's February meeting. Since that time the task force has met twice. ANALYSIS The task force did make a recommendation to the Commission that included a much larger scope of work. Upon reviewing their recommendation the Commission decided it would be more prudent to limit the scope of work and delay the remainder until the Master Plan is completed. Itis felt the Master Plan may be able to assist the City in determining what the building can be used for in the future thus determining the remainder of workthat will need to be done. That is why the Commission is not recommending anymore work be done to the building until that report is completed. However it is being recommended that the Council approve the replacement of the existing roof now as it is in such a deteriorated condition that the remainder of the building will be destroyed by the elements if something is not done in the near future. As a City building, that piece of property has been neglected for years and the Commission would at least like to try to keep it from further deterioration. Staff did receive an estimate on the replacement of the roof and replacement of any dryrot that may be found. The roof replacement is estimated at $14,000 and the dryrot work was estimated at $45 per hour plus materials. The degree of dryrot cannot be determined until the roof is removed, therefore the hourly rate estimate is all that is available at this time. This project, should it be approved by the City Council, will be going out to formal bid. The remainder of work, the cleaning up of the/inside and outside, and the removal of debris can be done in-house. Concur: Kevin B. Northcr4ft City Manager An ony Antich Public Works D rector Respectfully submitted Alana Mastrian-Handman Director Community Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal ,Impact Viki Copland Finance Administrator Proposed Action: To approve staff recommendation. Motion Sheldon, second Rosenberger. Noting NO votes by Creighton, Simpson, and Williams, motion fails. Action:- To refer back to staff, and to go out to -bid again on "revamping" the system, revising the specifications. Motion Creighton, second Simpson. So ordered, noting the objection of Rosenberger. Recommendations to approve initial repair work to Old Prospect School. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Alana Mastrian-Handman dated June 1,.1989. • Addressing the Council on this item was: Gerry Compton - 200 Pier Avenue - explaining that he had inspected the condition of the roof. Action: To deny staff recommendation, and repair the roof with "gook". Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson NOES - Rosenberger, Williams Recommendation to receive and file report on emergency sewer repair. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 20, 1989. its Recommendation to express intent to purchase School Dis- trict surplus land formerly used for South and Prospect Heights Schools. Memorandum from City Manager. Kevin B. Northcraft dated June 22, 1989. Action: To have the City Council confirm its intent to acquire the surplus property offered for sale by the Hermosa Beach City School District, known as .29 acres located off Prospect Avenue between Gentry and Hollo- well, and 4.51 acres located at 425 Valley Drive, and authorize City staff and a Council representative to meet with the School District to finalize transaction. Recommendation to award bid for Excess Workers' Compen- sation insurance to General Reinsurance Corporation. Memorandum from Risk Manager Robert A. Blackwood dated June 20, 1989. Action: To award the City's Express'Workers' Compensa- tion insurance through the Independent Cities °Risk Man- agement Authority (ICRMA) to whoever can supply at the best rate, for a deposit premium not to exceed $12,000. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to adopt resolution for handicapped park- ing spaces in the downtown business area. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated June 13, 1989. 7 -- Minutes 6-27-89 • FORT LOTS -O -FUN & OLD PROSPECT:SCHOOL FACILITIES Facility No. Provided .swings .slides 1 .log house 1 .climber .1 .drinking'fountain 1 .benches/tables - 4 .fenced enclosure .school building: 2 rooms/1200 sq. feet 2 PROGRAMS None provided. EVALUATION This .3 acre park at the corner of 6th Street and Prospect Avenue is the site of the first school building in Hermosa Beach. The building remains, but it and its yard are separated from the park by a fence; the building is used for storage. There is minimal on -street parking; the park serves the needs of neighborhood families with small children. The park is raised above the grade of both streets; the entry path off of 6th Street has a fairly steep gradient. The, entire park is fenced. A dirt pathway encircles the sand surfaced play equipment area. A patch of turf provides a change in surface texture. Benches are located near the play area, and there is a picnic area carved out 'of the slope between the school and the developed park. The somewhat creative play equipment may be the source of the park's name. Mature Eucalyptus. trees are magnificent. Although this park has the elements required to provide for families of young children, several improvements are called for. First, there are hazards: jagged edges of the footings of the retaining wall at -the entry are exposed;.irrigation heads are staked with pipes that jut several inches out of the ground; the entry slope is such that a ball can roll down it, out the gate, into 6th Street, and onto Prospect Avenue, a heavily traveled thoroughfare; trees are staked with chains. Second, use could be improved: paving the path (if the entry slope is separated with a barrier) would provide for wheeled toys and ease of maintenance; a more spacious picnic area could be developed; the school yard could be used to expand the park; the school building could be used for neighborhood activities that do not require parking, such as child care and scout center. A master plan for this park should address the issues of safety and improved use and incorporate the Old Prospect School and yard into the park. OLD HERMOSA SCHOOL HOUSE PROJECT POTENTIAL USES FOR BUILDING 1. Youth Activity Center 2. Meeting Hall 3. Lease to Pre-school/Day Care 4. Rent to non-profit agency(ies) 5. Historical Society Museum 6. Senior Center 7. Exhibit Hall April 16, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members Cit'y Council Meeting of of the City Council April 24+, 1990 FARMERS' MARKET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by staff that Council approve and direct the Chamber of Commerce in. their efforts to initiate a Farmers Market in downtown Hermosa Beach. Staff further recommends 'the following as detailed in the analysis below: . Approve market as a "special event" per Section 22-5 of the Municipal code for six month trial period (waive fees) . Conditional Use Permit after six month trial (waive fees) . Business License (for Southland Farmers' Market Association) . $1 million general liability insurance . Indemnity clause . Market location: East half of parking lot C . Waive meter enforcement 13th Street meters west of Hermosa Avenue from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on market days . Hold Chamber responsible for clean-up and associated costs . Waive fees for banner. permits BACKGROUND The Chamber of Commerce has requested permission to hold a weekly Farmers' Market in downtown Hermosa Beach beginning in July, 1990 (see attached). This proposed activity would take place on Mondays from 10:00 am - 2:00 pm on the east half of Parking Lot C (located on 13th Street west of Hermosa Avenue). The concept behind a Farmers' Market is that items are grown by the farmers and sold directly to the consumer. The Chamber will utilize the services of Southland Farmers' Market Association which is a non-profit, certified' organization which means that County Agricultural Commissioners have certified each seller's produce as being farm direct (see attached). AiNALYSIS City staff has investigated this request. Listed below are the areas that the Chamber should address in presenting this activity as well as a review of what the. City of Torrance and Redondo Beach have done to facilitate their own markets. 1 1 (A) Planning Department: City staff suggests that the market, be operated as a "special event" under section 22-5 of the municipal code for a six month trial period. During this time, it can be added as a permanent permitted use with a CUP (and an EIR required if staff review indicates need). It is recommended that all applicable permit fees for the above be waived. The City of Torrance (Farmers' Market is City -run) prepared an EIR which they noted was particularly non -controversial. The City of Redondo Beach handles the market as a "street fair activity." They made no changes in city codes and did not require a Planning Commission review. As they interpreted that there was no construction and no project they did not notify the Coastal Commission about the market. (B) Business License: Staff suggests that a single business license be obtained by the Southland Farmers' Market Association as opposed to charging each participating vendor. The City of Torrance amended a City Code in order to exempt the farmers from paying license fees. The City collects 5% of gross proceeds from each stall. The City of Redondo Beach does not charge business license fees to the farmers. (C) Insurance: Staff would suggest that the market provide liability insurance as is standard with other special events ($1 million naming the City as additional insured) and an indemnity clause for use of the property. As other Farmers' Markets have received claims, it would be advisable to require the above. The City of Torrance requires $1 1/2 million general liability for the market. The City of Redondo Beach requires $1 million in general liability insurance from Southland Farmers' Market Association. (D) County Health Codes: The County has health codes related specifically to farmers' markets. Requirements are not stringent but do include providing restrooms within 200'; no animals; keeping food 6" from ground; and sterilized utensil requirements for sampling. Staff has requested this information from the County. 2 (E) Clean up: The Chamber's assigned market manager should be responsible to see that the premises'are clean after each market day. It may be necessary to have a special cleaning with a street sweeper after each market day as is done in both Torrance and Redondo Beach. Currently, Allright Parking is responsible for lot clean-up. It is recommended that the Chamber make arrangements with them for sweeping:, City crews will attend to 13th Street as regularly _scheduled. (F) Parking: Parking lot requests will need to be addressed to Allright Parking. The east half of Parking Lot C seems to be an appropriate location for this kind of activity because the lot is rarely full during those weekday hours. .The west half of the lot would remain available for parking.. The Chamber may also request free parking for the 13th Street meters west of Hermosa Avenue, which could be done at Council discretion. (G) Security: The market should have a manager on duty at all times who can be contacted by City staff should security concerns arise. No notable security problems were reported by Torrance or Redondo Beach. (H) Publicity: Staff suggests the City assist in publicizing this event with the City newsletter and by waiving fees for banner permits as well as proclaiming the opening day as "Farmers' Market Day" at the appropriate Council meeting. The popularity of farmers' markets is growing rapidly. Both Torrance and Redondo Beach have been pleased with and successful at these markets (Torrance has been doing this for 5 years and Redondo Beach for 10). Average attendance at the Torrance market is 5,000 while Redondo Beach claims 1,000-2,000 depending on the season. The Chamber of Commerce is hoping that this market will attract visitors to the downtown area as well as provide a wholesome activity for residents. They have committed to funding the market which will likely take time to develop and the City would do well to support their efforts in bringing the project to fruition. Concur: evin B. Northc City Ma age Bill Grove, Director Building Department 3 Respectfully submitted, Mary . �..oney, Director Dept o ` Community Resources Michael Schubach, i'rector Planning Departm_� ob Blackwood Risk Manager HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 To: City Manager Kevin Northcraft From: Wesley D. Bush Subject: Farmer's Market April 11, 1990 The following matters need to be addressed as the next step toward the goal of opening our Farmers Market i,n July: 1. Negotiate with parking lot operator to waive fees in Lot C on the day of the market from 8am to 4pm. 2. Negotiate to bag parking meters on 14th Street from 9am to 3pm the same day. Chamber will furnish bags. 3. Contact BFI relative to having dumpster available in the vicinity on market day. 4. Notify Coastal Commission of our plans. 5. Notify County Board of Health. 6. -Notify Public Safety Department. 7. Arrange for Public Works Department to put up and remove Farmers Market banner. Chamber will furnish banner. 8. Proclamation for Farmer's Market Week. Any assistance in coordinating these efforts will be appreciated. Chamber is handling insurance through Bichlmeier Insurance. Arrangements for rest room facilities will be worked out with a neighboring restaurant. Clean up will be taken care of by the Chamber. Copy: Mary Rooney •. Mayor Roger Creighton ..Y.n..r�rirnrrrr. 110111111111111111.1141* T crer This brochure is provided in preparation for your visit to a Certified Farmers' Market. Markets are located on a variety of sites: Church parking lots, school premises, and even blocked -off streets. The markets are set up once a week usually for, four hours. For your convenience, a list of markets with their locations, hours of operation, and managers has been enclosed. WHAT IS A CERTIFIED FARMERS' MARKET? The concept behind the Certified Farmers' Market is that all items are grown by the farmer and brought directly to you, the consumer. In cooperation with the County Agricultural Commissioners around the state, each grower is certified as the actual producer thus as a consumer you can be assured of California -grown produce. We encourage you to inquire with the farmer about his/her operation. Each grower takes pride in discussing their work with you and in turn you can appreciate even more the products of their efforts. PRICES As a shopper at the Certified Farmers' Market you can expect to save 20- 30% in your purchases. Surveys have indicated this is possible due to Direct Marketing regulations applicable to Certified Farmers' Markets which exempt growers from labeling, and standard packaging. By direct marketing, farmer -to -consumer, growers do not have to incur certain costs and this, in turn, means savings to you. Remember that only California -grown products are sold at the markets saving transportation costs which contributes to lower prices for the consumer. QUALITY Quality at the markets is ensured in various ways. First, in cooperation with the Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner, inspectors visit the markets and inspect both the grower's certification and their products. These are 'the same inspectors who maintain quality at all retail stores. This helps to maintain quality standards plus assure the continued participation of only farmers. In addition, Southland Farmers' Market Association market managers do meet for quality control workshops. This is an in- house training which helps managers have a continued awareness of quality and seasonal availability of crops. WHO OPERATES THE MARKET? Markets may be sponsored by a local community group or by the city in which the market is located. The sponsoring group is responsible for directing the market manager. In addition, each market has both a community and farmer representative who serve on the Southland Farmers' Market Asso- ciation Board of Directors. • COMPLAINTS If you should have any complaints -• — concerning your purchase, feel free to approach the grower about your situation. There"are also market managers at each location that are available to answer any questions you may have. 'Lastly, the Southland Farmers' Market Association who is responsible for coordinating all member -markets may also be contacted. Your input will benefit all markets. SOUTHLAND FARMERS' MARKET ASSOCIATION "Direct from the farm to the consumer." (213) 749-9551 LOS ANGELES COUNTY • ALHAMBRA— Sundays, 9:00 am - 1:00 pm Chico Street near Garfield and Main FROM THE FARMER TO CONSUMER At a Southland Certified Farmers'-, Market you.buy directlyfrom the farmer. In fact, the person handling your purchase is usually the person who grew it!.{ ' „,,,Any questions about selecting, preparin 'or',preserving ',-your, fresh food? ; Ask : th person ..who; knows the best: The:Farmer! Most,.of;our farms are family; owned and- operated.'FBy'eliminating the .middle man, these families are able to gain a foothold against today's hard times .while you can expect an average savings of 20-30%1 BELL— Sundays 10:00 am - 2:00 pm 6312 Atlantic Ave. between Gage and Randolph GARDENA— Saturdays, 6:30 am -12 Noon 13000 Van Ness Avenue just south of El Segundo Blvd. LOS ANGELES— Wednesdays, 2:00 pm - 5:00 pm 1432 West Adams Blvd. at St. Agnes Church POMONA- Saturdays, 7:30 am -11:30 am corner of Pearl and Garey Ave. REDONDO BEACH— Thursdays, 10:00 am - 2:00 pm End of Torrance Blvd, at the Redondo Beach pier SAN FERNANDO VALLEY— Saturdays, 7:00 am -10:00 am 14400 Van Nuys Blvd., west of the 5 freeway *SANTA MONICA— Wednesdays, 10:00 am - 3:00 pm intersection of Arizona and 2nd SOUTHGATE— Mondays, 9:00 am - 1:00 pm '; Southgate Park, corner of Tweedy and Walnut VENICE— Fridays, 7:00 am - 10:30 am corner of Pacific Ave. and Venice Blvd. WEST HOLLYWOOD— Mondays, 10:00 am - 2:00 pm 7377 Santa Monica Blvd. at Plummer Park The Southland Farmers' Market Associ- ation is a non-profit, tax-exempt organization dedicated to bringing the farmer and consumer together for the benefits of direct marketing. SAN DIEGO COUNTY CORONADO— Thursdays, 3:00 pm - 7:00 pm 7th and Orange, next to Visitor's Center.. • ESCONDIDO— Tuesdays, 4:00 pm - 8:00 pm Grand Ave. between Broadway and Maple • NORTH COUNTY— Wednesdays, 10:00 am - 1:00 pm 3660 Sunset Drive, 2 blocks east of 115 off Via Rancho Parkway PACIFIC BEACH— Saturdays, 8:00 am - 12 Noon The Promenade -on Mission between Reed & Pacific Beach Blvd. *call for time and location after April 1st. For 'more `information .7'0-2 . about a market near you call: (213) 749-9551 Our farmers bring food fresh from their fields directly to you, and freshness means good nutrition. Vegetables, fruit, eggs, fish, 'nuts, honey and fresh cut flowers are all at the peak of their season. Bring new life to your favorite recipes:.use farm fresh produce from your Southland Certified Farmers' Market! THE MARKETS • Rain or -shine,. our markets are open year 'round. You can expect a shopping day like no other: warm, friendly, relaxed and filled with an outdoor, festive atmosphere! Certified means that our farmers must meet the standards of th"e California Deparment of Food and. Agriculture includ- ing quality and assurances that the food is California grown, direct from the farmer. —We accept food stamps— MEMORANDUM TO: FELLOW COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: COUNCILMEMBER MIDSTOKKE RE: REPORT ON MEETINGS OF SANITATION DISTRICT AND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1989 DATE: APRIL 19, 1990 for CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24 APRIL 18, 1990 MEETING OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SOUTH BAY SANITATION DISTRICT At this meeting there was a discussion of a plan that is being studied by the City of Los Angeles for Sewage Outfall from the Hyperion Treatment Plant. An Environmental Impact Report is being prepared and one of the three possible sites being considered is King Harbor Area in Redondo Beach. Redondo Beach has already taken a position in opposition to this site, and I wanted to bring this to your attention since it is immediately adjacent to Hermosa Beach. Also discussed was the District's Annual Palos Verdes Coast Boat Tour for the following Saturdays: May 5, 12, and 19th leaving San Pedro from 8:00AM- 12:00Noon. It is a very informative, worthwhile program which includes water sampling techniques and evaluation of fish and marine life. Councilmembers, staff, and family members may. attend. APRIL 18, 1990 MEETING ON INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1989 This meeting was 'also attended by Building and Safety Director William Grove. Representatives were there from the 15 cities in the Sanitation Districts. Most of the cities' Public Works Departments handled this area. The Integrated Solid Waste Management Act of 1989 is 135 pages of new-,,goinplex Taw imposing strict requirements on all cities in California, many with very short time frames. The first deadline is July, 1990, in which to begin a six-month initial Waste Generation Study. It must include the type and amount of all\ wastes generated, recovered, and disposed of by a City. This includes identifying all trash, residential, commercial, construction, etc. The purpose of this meeting given by the Sanitation District was to see if there was interest in joining together the cities in the District and coordinating plans. The Sanitation District is willing to facilitate and provide $500,000 to $1,000,000 in funding. Conceptually this would mean that instead of each of the cities independently hiring consultants, that we could join together and the District would hire one and we could all use the report. They requested that cities write them a letter expressing initial interest in obtaining mor,e.,,information on a joint effort. A majority in attendance at the meeting indicated interest. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY 1955 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, CA 90601-4998 Mailing Address: P. 0. Box 4998, Whittier, CA 90607-4998 Telephone: (213) 699-7411, (213) 685-5217 Member Cities County Sanitation District No. 5 and South Bay Cities Sanitation District Dear City Manager/City Administrator: CHARLES W. CARRY Chief Engineer and General Manager April 4, 1990 File No. 31R-10.10 April 18, 1990 Meeting on Integrated Solid Waste Management Act of 1989 On December 18, 1989, the Sanitation Districts sent your city a letter about the subject law (AB 939, Sher) which became effective January 1, 1990. This letter discussed some of the effects the law would have on individual cities and how it would affect solid waste management within Los Angeles County. Recently, emergency regulations have been adopted by the Integrated Waste Management Board (IWMB) which cities and counties are to follow in meeting the requirements of AB 939. On Wednesday, April 18, 1990 at 2:30 p.m. the Sanitation Districts Solid Waste Management Staff will host a meeting on AB 939 for member cities at the Torrance Civic Center Library Meeting Room at 3301 Torrance Blvd. AB 939 requires all cities to prepare a comprehensive solid waste management plan called a Source Reduction and Recycling Element. The information required in city plans can be broken down into four main divisions. • A waste characterization that includes the type and amount of all wastes (residential, 1' 4 7 and industrial) enerq,—d .ecovered and di�pcsed of by a commercial, gV�eailllleil�21, u.iJ. gv � J, w.vay.s, i. , city. • A plan, with an implementation schedule, to clearly define initially how 25% and ultimately 50% reduction in the wastestream will be accomplished through source reduction, recycling, composting, and household hazardous waste and special waste programs. The program planning and support section of the plan element must include sections on how cities will fund the required plan and its implementation, how cities will increase public knowledge and participation and what cities will do with the remaining 75% and 50% of their solid waste from 1995 to 2000. City Administrator/City Manager April 4, 1990 Page 2 • Coordination and integration of all the above sections and how they will work together to achieve the plan goals. At the April 18th meeting, the Sanitation Districts staff will review the IWMB's emergency regulations implementing AB 939 and discuss the role that the Sanitation Districts can play in facilitating coordinated efforts among various groups of cities. The Sanitation Districts are suggesting the use of Districts solid .waste funds to assist cities, that join together to develop coordinated plans, with a portion of their planning costs. The Sanitation Districts realize that a number of cities may already be moving ahead on developing AB 939 plans. However, even if your city has started the planning process, you may want to take advantage of this opportunity to interact with other cities and consider how cities might appropriately group together to make the process easier and minimize common expenditures for all involved and pursue the role of the Sanitation Districts in your AB 939 planning efforts. I hope that your city will be able to attend this meeting and that it will lead to a cooperative program which will allow cities to move forward most economically and expeditiously in complying with this important solid waste legislation. However, if your city cannot send a representative please contact Mr. William George, the Sanitation Districts' Recycling Coordinator, at either of the above listed telephone numbers, to advise of your interest so we can keep you informed of future developments. Very truly yours, Charles W. Carry CWC:jas cc: Boards of Directors JANUARY 1, 1991 Mard1 1g61I JULY 1, 1991 JANUARY 1, 1995 DATES TO REMEMBER INITIAL WASTE GENERATION STUDY REPRESENTING 6 MONTHS OF DATA MUST BE COMPLETED. rtb aI o►o review )0 1j EAs, CITY APPROVED SOURCE REDUCTION AND- RECYCLING ELEMENTS (SRRE) MUST BE AT COUNTY FOR INCORPORATION INTO THE COUNTY INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (COIWMP). 25% DIVERSION BY SOURCE REDUCTION, RECYCLING AND COMPOSTING. (Curbside, gjfic,: T -E6/0 recxiG14n5 JANUARY .1, 2000 50% DIVERSION. WASTE CHARACTERIZATION AMOUNT DISPOSED (LANDFILL, ETC.) + AMOUNT DIVERTED (RECYCLE, ETC.) AMOUNT GENERATED NEED TO DETERMINE BOTH AMOUNT AND COMPOSITION OF: RESIDENTIAL WASTE COMMERCIAL WASTE INDUSTRIAL WASTE DEMOLITION CONSTRUCTION WASTE MATERIAL DIVERTED COMPOSITION 8 MAIN CATEGORIES (34 TYPES) 1. PAPER (5) 2. PLASTIC (4) 3. GLASS (4) 4. METAL (5) 5. YARD WASTE (1) 6. ORGANICS (5) 7. SPECIAL (7) 8. OTHERS (3) HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT CALENDAR YEAR 1990 MARCH FIRE STATISTICS 1. Mutual Aid CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE LAST CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE 1. Total Calls 90 79 . 221 247 (TYPE) a. False Alarm 7 5 18 15 b. Mutual Aid 2 0 4 0 c. Paramedic Assists 48 36 108 113 d. Residence Fire 8 7 22 24 e. Commercial Fire 1 3 6 10 f. Vehicle Fire 0 2 4 8 g. Hazardous Mtls. 6 3 14 8 h. Other 18 23 45 69 1. Mutual Aid CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE LAST CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE 1. Total Responses 102 77 • 252 244 (TYPE) a. No Patient/Aid 7 6 • 23 24 b. Medical 40 34 112 102 c. Trauma 55 36 117 117 1. Mutual Aid 0 0 2 0 2. Auto Accident 23 24 51 51 3. Strand Accident 9 3 17 11 4. Assault 11 7 23 24, 5. Jail 8 4 14 15 6. Transports 62 39 149, 121 7. Base Hosp.Con. 30 23 82 67 8, Trauma Center 5 0 8 3 INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR • CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE LAST CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE • 1. Commercial 65 38 . 137 239 2. Assembly 0 0 2 0 3. -Apartments 56 21 111 73 4. Fumigations 16 10 31 43 5. Institutions 6 0 6 0 6. Industrial 0 0 .0 5 NOTED.: evin B. Northc a t, City Manager ctfully s 'mitted, Steve Wisn`e Director of Public Safety HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT CALENDAR YEAR 1990 MARCH OFFENSES REPORTED PERSONS ARRESTED CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE LAST CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE 1. Murder 0 0 0 0 2. Rape 0 0 0 0 3. Robbery 2 3 9 9 4. Assault 12 12 31 35 5. Burglary 39 29 94 76 6. Larceny 30 35 102 112 7. Motor Vehicle Theft 11 14 34 34 8. DUI 27 19 92 47 9. All Other Offenses 383 312 930 740 10. 415 Calls 269 * 627 * PERSONS ARRESTED I nnr I a'. FL.-vn CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE LAST CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE 1. Adults 133 67 305 200 2. Juveniles 0 0 1 0 3. Criminal Citations 167 122 497 208 4. 5-24/5-42 HNC 2 32 • 10 32 I nnr I a'. FL.-vn CURRENT MONTH CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE LAST CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE ACCIDENTS 0 0 0 0 1. Fatal 2. Injury 13 11 33 36 3. Property damage only 22 . 20 55 ' 59 CITATIONS 711 315 1961 1041 1. Traffic Citations 2. Parking Citations 13 57 29 68 CALLS FOR SERVICE * figures not available NOTED: .tage'a-au-efirC2 ok-c4vi Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager tfully sutmitted, Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE LAST CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE 1. Total Calls 3077 2079 8863 5611 * figures not available NOTED: .tage'a-au-efirC2 ok-c4vi Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager tfully sutmitted, Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety April 16, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 24, 1990 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, MARCH 1990 The City Manager and Finance Director met with County auditors regarding the audit of citation payments made to the court. The auditors supplied additional information requested by the City. The Finance Department is verifying amounts owed and a report will be submitted to the City Council upon completion. - Departmental budgets and revenue estimates were submitted for the 1990-92 budget. Group and individual meetings begin in April. - Departments have submitted an.accounting of time spent on Tidelands oil issues to allow recovery from Tidelands funds. Such time is now submitted on a regular basis. - Mr. Jim Weber conducted an audit of the downtown parking lots for the period July 1987 through May 14, 1989. He reviewed procedures used on the lots, verified bank statements, bank reconciliations and cash reports for each month of the period. A detailed study of four specific months was also performed. All records were found to be in order. STATISTICAL SECTION CURRENT ) PMONTHUB ITLASTMYEAR ONTH I YEAR DATEO I LASTOT DATER CITATION PAYMENTS 4,052 5,103 5,042 43,308 42,845 INVOICES 4 5 3 86 63 CASH RECEIPTS 2,612 1,817 1,419 13,348 10,674 WARRANTS 314 327 299 2,613 2,723 PURCHASE ORDERS 399 415 316 3,236 2,651 UUT EXEMPTIONS 635 620 598 FILED TO DATE PAYROLL FULL TIME 162 163 PART TIME 45 51 Noted: UthhaAtzatda-O__�t Kevin B. Northcraft Viki Cop land 155 48 City Manager Finance Director April :17, 1990 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of April 24, 1990 HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT MARCH 1990 Staff reports were prepared for the following: 1. 1 Sign Waiver 2. 1 1st Quarter General Plan Amendments 3. 1 Certification of EIR 4. 2 Text Amendments 5. 1 Circulation Element 6. 1 Conditional Use Permit (Condominium) 7. 1 Final Map 8. 3 Zone Changes 9. 1 Variance 10. 1 FY 90-91 CDBG Report 11. 1 Special study hardship definition 12. 2 Conditional Use Permit Amendments 13. 5 Exceptions to Article 13 nonconforming structure remodels 14. 1 List of completed projects for inspection 15. 1 Conditional Use Permit The following activities were undertaken for transit projects: 1. Routine tasks. Meetings and seminars attended by the Planning Department Staff: 1. 26 meetings Budget Update: Ending 03/31/90, revenues were 17% above budget for 75% of FY 89-90. Ending 03/31/90, expenditures were 12% below budget for 75% of FY 89-90. Transit Update: "WAVE" Dial -A -Ride Ridership: Last FY 03/90 03/89 FY to Date to Date Hermosa Beach Passengers 841 984 7,294 7,356 Redondo Beach Passengers 3,902 3,981 35,029 39,309 Satellite Passengers 395 521 3,050 3,890 Upcoming agenda items to City Council: 1. 1 Text Amendment regarding height of hedges and fences 2. 1 Power Street grading plan 3. 1 Air Quality Management Plan 4. 1 Special Study to rezone Biltmore Site 5. 1 Text Amendment regarding alcohol sales at gas stations Michael Scbubach Planning Director NOTED: fitrea)10444;10 Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 2 Respectfully submitted, Andrea N. Ar1erson Planning Aide Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council April 24, 1990 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES MARCH, 1990 ACTIVITY REPORT The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of March. RECREATION PROGRAMMING March 1 - March was the start of .the Employee Recreation Volleyball Challenge. The tournament went well with great enthusiasm from all the participants involved. The Fire Department ("Love Shift A") proved to be victorious with a record of 5 - 0. March 4 - Spring Recreation Classes began this month. Spring 1990 marked the largest participation by residents to date. Approximately 30% more classes were offered. • March 7 - The Senior Club ventured on their second trip of the year to Lawrence Welk Village in Escondido. A total of 38 seniors attended. • March 8 - Staff attended a wrap-up meeting with the Sand and Strand Race coordinators. The City's share of the proceeds was $650.00. . March 12 - Staff met with Diana McKay of the Hermosa Beach Jaycees to firm up the plans for the Annual Easter Egg Hunt which was held April 14, 1990 at 1:00 PM. SPECIAL EVENTS • March 15, 16, 17 and 18 - Staff attended the Annual California Parks and Recreation Society Conference in San Diego. • March 20 - Staff attended a meeting of the Surf Festival Committee. • March 24 - The Pediatric AIDS Foundation in conjunction with the Women's Culinary Alliance sponsored a "Children with AIDS Fundraiser" on the Community Center lawn. There were various items sold, door prizes and drawings as well as mural painting which was displayed on the north and west sides of the Community Center Tennis Courts. ▪ March 27 - Staff attended a Senior Club meeting to see where they would like to go on their last trip of the year. They chose to go to Knotts Berry Farm sometime in May. March 31 - The American Diabetes Association sponsored a Bike Ride through Hermosa Beach. On March 31, 1990 approximately 200 participants attended. COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION • Two new programs have been planned by the Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation and the Department of Community Resources. In June the Hermosa Civic Theatre will introduce the Showcase Theatre Series and the Adult Film Series (Academy Award Winners of the 1930's, 40's and 50's). ▪ All publicity and marketing was completed for the Mariette Hartley Show - "An Evening with Mariette Hartley" on April 28, 1990 at 8:00 PM. The Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation is in the process of meeting with the Theatre Arts Conservatory Group to determine if it would be possible to have a local resident theatre company at the Civic Theatre. FILM PERMITS • March 16 - One day of student filming took place in Hermosa Beach. FACILITY RESERVATIONS • There are currently 42 facility users. • In March the department processed 18 facility reservations. Facility User Hours Field 225 Theatre 135 Clark 164 Gym 257 Room 4 92 Room 7 14 Room 8 87 Room 10 102 Room 12 55 DEPARTMENT REVENUE Current This Month FY Last Fy Month Last Fy To Date To Date $22,610.50 $27,365.25 $2024,023.27 $16'4,119.27 Revenue Projection: $2249,650 Community Resources Department general fund revenue for 75% of the fiscal year is $204,023.27 or 82% of the projected figure. Concur: Mary .0 ooney Direct.r Dept. of Community Resources. Noted: evin B. Northcraft V City Manager Respectfully submitted, Acting Coordinator Honorable Mayorand Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MARCH ACTIVITY REPORT Parking Cites Issued Vehicles Impounded/Booted Calls Responded To Booting Revenue - Citations Issued Warnings Issued Complaints Responded To Total Number of Animals Picked -Up of which: Returned to Owner Taken to Shelter Injured, taken to Vet Deceased CONCUR: Hen y L. Staten, Acting General Services Director fN/'0.6/L-'l1AAJfJ �,�'t'/f%/ 'Kevin�� B. Northcraft ' City Manager PARKING ENFORCEMENT Current Month 7,165 37 150 $2,694 93 0 56 79 27 29 1 22 This Month Last Year 6,919 36 103 $3,440 ANIMAL CONTROL 59 739 April 17, 1990 City Council Meeting of April 24, 1990 Last Fiscal Year Fiscal Year To Date To Date 64,835 315 1,172 $29,105 0 0 54 514 51 528 17 19 2 13 157 182 22 161 61,565 292 961 $41,770 461 1 420 436 129 148 16 146 Respectfully submitted, Henry L. Staten, Acting Director by _ %�,,� Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council April 16, 1990 ACTIVITY REPORT DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY MARCH, 1990 Attached for your information are recap sheets of department ac- tivity for the month of March as well as the quarterly report of buildings completed and demolished from January 1,,1990 through March 31, 1990. Overall permit activity remained steady in March as the depart- ment issued 68 permits of which 30 were building permits. Two permits were issued for single family dwellings and one permit was issued for a three unit condominium. Sixteen permits were issued for alterations or additions to existing dwellings. Four dwelling units were demolished resulting in a net increase of one dwelling unit to the housing inventory. Building. Department general fund revenue for 75`L of the fiscal year is $269,035.54 or 72.48% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. Total revenue for all funds is $507,581.02. The Business License division reports that 208 licenses were is- sued during March resulting in revenue of $31,017.62. Business License revenue to date represents 67.87 of projected revenue for the fiscal year. The department logged 25 new code enforcement complaints during March, of which two were for illegal dwelling units. One case was closed and the department currently has twenty-six illegal dwell- ing unit cases under investigation. Noted: %ro Kevin B. Northcraft U City Manager. Respectfully Sug-/t mitted, Q� William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT. Month of MARCH 1990 NUMBER OF CURRENT. MONTH THIS MONTH __ _FY'TO— LAST FY PERMITS LAST FY DATE TO DATE Building 30 23 235 278 Plumbing 20 19 238 219 Electric 18 21 208 205 Plan Check 24 11 136 129 Sewer Use 1 4 -19 19 Res. Bldg.Reports 28 36 '213 321 Comm. Inspections 14 25 135 154 Parks & Recreation 0 0 2 5 In lieu Park & Rec. 1 5 21 28 Board of Appeals 0 0 3 1 Sign Review 4 8 32 26 Fire Flow Fees 4 7 62 84 TOTALS 144 159 1,304 1,469 FEES Building** 11,743.24 15,552.06 117,347.39 144,082.19 Plumbing 2,033.00 1,872.00 27,812.00 21,913.00 Electric 2,023.50 3,042.00 31,963.00 27,601.00 Plan Check 9,967.23 8,518.00 80,033.15 107,207.61 Sewer Use 622.01 3,236.24 10,948.31 15,408.86 Res. Bldg. Reports 1,120.00 1,440.00 7,480.00 12,808.00 Comm. Inspections 350.00 625.00 3,375.00 3,985.00 Parks & Recreation 0 0 7,000.00. ' 37,102.00 In lieu Park & Rec. 12,870.00 39,204.00 137,841.00 153,549.00 Board of Appeals 0 0 225.00 75.00 Sign Review 100.00 200.00 800.00 600.00 Fire Flow Fees 5,914.00 12,471.00 82,756.17 121,836.59 TOTALS 46,742.98 86,160.30 507,581.02 646,168.25 VALUATIONS 1,090,782 1,759,522 11,387,490 13,497,040 **Includes State Seismic Fee $78.32 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED TYPE OF STRUCTURE Month of -MARCH 1990 DWELLING' UNITS PERMITS PROVIDED'' —VALUATION 1. Single Dwellings 2 2 378,242 2. Duplex Dwellings 3. Triplex Dwellings 1 3 477,272 4. Four Units or More 5. Condominiums 6. Commercial Buildings 7. Industrial Buildings 8. Publicly Owned Buildings 9. Garages - Residential 10. Accessory Buildings 11. Fences and Walls 12. Swimming Pools 13. Alterations, additions or repairs to dwellings 16 110,768 14. Alterations, additions or repairs to Commercial Bldgs. 4 24,500 15. Alterations, additions or repairs to indus. bldgs. 3 100,000 16. Alterations, additions or repairs to publicly owned bldgs. 17. Alterations, additions, repairs to garages or accessory bldgs. 18. Signs 19. Dwelling units moved 20. Dwelling units demolished 21. All other permits not listed TOTAL PERMITS' 30 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: 1,090,782 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED : 5 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DEMOLISHED: 4 NET CHANGE: +1 NET DWELLING UNIT CHANGE FY 89/90 +31 CUMULATIVE DWELLING UNIT TOTAL: 10,079 (INCLUDES PERMITS ISSUED) QUARTERLY REPORT FOR HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA BUILDINGS COMPLETED AND BUILDINGS DEMOLISHED JANUARY 1, 1990 THRU MARCH 31,''1990• ADDRESS 1235 2nd Street 621, 622, 623 9th Street 1421 Bonnie Brae Street 1074, 1076, 1078 Monterey 1110 3rd Street 722 Bayview Drive 1111, 1113 Valley Drive 1107, 1109 Valley Drive 706 Longfellow Avenue 1636 Monterey Blvd. 2422 Park Avenue 1040, 1050 Ardmore Avenue 1136 20th Street DEMOLISHED ADDRESS 1137 10th Street 1029 10th Street 540 1st Street 612 10th Street 2541 Hermosa Avenue 920 2nd Street 1301 Cypress Avenue 524 Pacific Coast Highway 444 llth.Street 225 27th Street 225 30th Street 631 6th Street 916 7th Street NO. OF UNITS 1 (SFR) 3 (Condos) 1 (SFR) 3 (Condos) 1 (SFR) 1 (SFR) 2 (Condos) 2 (Condos) 1 (SFR) 1 (SFR) 1 (SFR) 2 (Condos) 1 (SFR) NO. OF UNITS 1 (SFR) 1 (SFR) 1 (Commercial) 1 (SFR) 1 (Garage) 1 (SFR) 2 (Duplex) 1 (Commerical) 1 (SFR) 1 (SFR) 1 (SFR) 2 (Duplex) 1 (SFR) DATE COMPLETED ,1/4/90 1/16/90 2/7/90 2/7/90 2/22/90 2/22/90 2/22/90 ' 2/22/90 2/28/90 3/6/90 3/8/90 3/29/90 3/29/90 DATE COMPLETED 1/3/90 1/18/90 1/18/90 1/24/90 2/1/90 2/12/90 2/12/90 2/20/90 3/1/90 3/1/90 3/8/90 3/28/90 3/29/90 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: William Grove, Building & Safety Director FROM: Sherria Lawrence, Business License Clerk RE: Monthly report for March DATE: April 16, 1990 CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY $31,017.62 $19,939.00 Business Licenses Renewed New licenses issued during March 1990 Out of city licenses 35 Home Occupation license 10 New business licenses issued 9 New owners of existing business 2 Total 56 FY TO DATE LAST. FY TO DATE $278,185.49 $287,049.43 152 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 17, 1990 City Council Meeting of April 24, 1990 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT MARCH ACTIVITY REPORT Recruitment: During the month of March the Personnel Department: * Initiated recruitment for temporary Parking Enforcement Officers for the May 15 - Sept. 15 summer enforcement program in the impacted area. Civil Service Board: * At the March 21st Civil Service Board Meeting the Board took action to certify the eligibility list's for General Service Director and Community Resources Director, and abolished existing lists for Clerk Typist, Lateral and Pre -Experienced Police Officer, and Lateral Entry Public Safety Dispatcher. * Commissioner Ted Dalton was reelected to serve as Chairperson of the Board and Commissioner Barry Warner was elected to serve as Vice. Chairperson. Risk Management: * Liability Claims: March claims March claims Total claims filed 2 closed : 7 open : 29 General Appropriations Secretary: The General Appropriations Secretary performs secretarial support services for all City Departments as well as directory assistance for incoming calls and processing the City's mail. The following summary indicates the amount of time spent on each of the assig- ned functions. March: 170 hours available. Word Processing* 71% (121.00 hrs) Avg. 7.12 hrs/day Finance: City Manager: Planning: Public Works: Personnel: City Treasurer: Respectfully s Mail Processing 17% (28.50 hrs) Avg. 1.68 hrs/day 25% (30.50 8% (10.00 22% (27.00 21% (25.00 23% (27.50 1% ( 1.00 Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director hrs) hrs) hrs) hrs) hrs) hrs) Directory/Dept Support 15% (20.50 hrs) Avg. 1.21 hrs/day April 4., 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council April 24, 1990 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - MARCH 1990 The Public Works. Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration function coordinates and blends the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager; includes engineering and management of capital improvement projects. Permits Issued: Type Current Month Last FY To Date To Date This Month FY Last FY Sewer Demolition Sewer Lateral Street Excavation Utility Co's only Dumpster/Strand Banner Permits 2 4 25 42 4 0 15 13 5 6 70 71 90 21 211 195 1 3 16 20 1 3 8 10 ENGINEERING The Capital Improvement Projects which are currently in progress are: CIP 85-102 CIP 85-137 CIP 89-141 CIP 89-142 CIP 89-148 CIP 89-149 CIP 89-150 CIP 88-174 CIP 88-406 CIP 88-407 CIP 89-506 Highland Ave. Wide. CIP FAU, Asphaltic Over- CIP lay, Valley/Ardmore Pavement Mgmt. System CIP 89-517 Sidewalk Repairs CIP 89-518 Trash Enclosures CIP 89-519 Bus Shelters CIP 89-601 Misc. Traf. Sig. Imp. CIP 89-604 Overlay Prospect CIP 89-615 Sewer Rehab/Area 4 CIP 89-701 Sewer Bonding Various Park Imp. 89-512 89-516 MAINTENANCE Basketball Courts 6th St. & Prospect Park Recreational. Fac. Recreational Fac. Hermosa Parks Fuel Tanks Var. Bldg. Imp. Comm. Ctr. Fire Alarm City Parking Lot Imp. The maintenance function of the Public Works Department is divided into the following sections: - Parks/Medians • - Street Maintenance/Sanitation - Sewers/Storm Drains Street Lighting - 1 - - Traffic Safety - Building Maintenance - Equipment Service \; Parks Division/Medians: Removed all shrubs from planter boxes on Hermosa Ave. from 10th Street to 14th Street'and repaired the irrigation in those boxes. Put down and leveled 24 yards of infield dirt on two ball diamonds at Clark Stadium; spread chips on Greenbelt between 8th Street and 10th Street. Street Maintenance/Sanitation: Completed construction of bus benches in the City except for PCH. Installed expanded metal cages over booking rooms in Police Station. Repaired potholes City wide. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Located and uncovered sewer manholes for Harris & Associates in preparation for sewer project; connected sewer lateral on Beach drive; worked on broken sewer line on Herondo between Monterey Blvd. & Hermosa Ave. Opened storm drains on the beach with crawler and continued with sewer rodding throughout the City. Street Lighting: Relamped the ball diamond lights at Clark Stadium; assisted the Building Maintenance Division with changing lighting on 2nd floor City Hall to energy savers; repaired street lights City-wide and assisted Traffic Safety Division with installation of signs and sign posts throughout the City. Traffic Safety Division: Continued replacing traffic control signs and posts throughout the City. Painted out graffiti as needed City wide and assisted the Street Lighting crew with changing the lighting system on the 2nd floor of City Hall. Building Maintenance Division: On three separate occasions removed graffiti in Clark Stadium restrooms, the fishing pier and the Community Center. Completed patch work and painted lawn bowling building; painted snack bar and announcer's booth at Clark Stadium; finished painting north side of the Community Center and painted the dugouts at the Clark Stadium ball field. Equipment Service: On-going maintenance of City vehicles and equipment. Respectfully submitted, An 'ony Xntich Noted: Kevin B. Norihcraft Director of Public Works City Manager mon2/pwadmin :mv