Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/25/925PM: oa-as-Qz MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, February 25, 1992, at the hour of 7:`/ P.M. CLOSED SESSION - The closed session was held at 7: P.M. regard- ing matters of potential litigation: pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b): and, matters of Personnel. The closed ses- sion was recessed at 7: P.M. to the regular scheduled public meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Laura Miller, Hermosa Valley School, Student of the Month ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Wiemans, Mayor Midstokke Absent: None HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL STUDENT OF THE MONTH: Laura Miller Mayor Midstokke congratulated Laura Miller for being recognized as the Hermosa Valley School, "Student of the Month", for the month of February, 1992, and wished her success in her future endeavors. CERTIFICATES OF COMMENDATION: John Kirhoffen and Eric Arthur Martinez Mayor Midstokke presented Certificates of Commendation to John Kirhoffen and Eric Arthur Martinez, and congratulated them for their valor for subduing a man with a knife threatening a woman, and restraining the man until police officers arrived to make the arrest. During the struggle with the man, both Mr. Kirhoffen and Mr. Martinez were injured by the knife the suspect was wielding. PROCLAMATION: American History Month, February, 1992 ANNOUNCEMENTS - Mayor Midstokke XXX • PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward to address the Counc 1 at this time were: —'.�- r ' 6%) ,S1-0 z Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, Wilma Burt - 1152. Seventh Street, >,/�iO -v" 4 June Willim 065 Manhattan/Avenue, Wave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd.,, (p -ted• av'-.tr ,---z) 7' i%" Jerry Compton - 832 Seventh Street, Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, Y)Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, mY-01)13�, Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, Edie Webber - 1210 Eleventh Street, Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, J ,/ °?1/1 -1 -4 -14 -4 -1? -44L -w-4 40-c a 06,0c,+_7 v),_52)2,..t23.7> "//‘Pt 1. (J CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (1), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3 but are listed in order for clarity: (a) , (b) , (c) (d) , (e) , (f) , (g) (h) , (i) , (k) , and (1) . Motion Es , second Eot . So ordered. Coming forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar were: • No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on February 11, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for further discussion later in the meeting. Action: To approve the minutes of February 11, 1992 as amended on page Motion , second . So ordered. (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants -.k Nos. - through inclusive. (0) This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for further discussion later in the meeting. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. Motion , second . So ordered. Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future if\ Agenda Items. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember for further discussion later in the meeting. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items. Motion )Z%, second &.- . So ordered. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the January, 1992 City Treasurer's report. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for further discussion later in the meeting. Action: To receive and file the January, 1992, City Treasurer's report. Motion , second So ordered. Recommendation to adopt_resolution ordering the prepara- tion of a report for the formation of a Hermosa Beach Street Lighting District during FY 1992-1993. Memoran- dum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated February 4, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for further discussion later in the meeting. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-5520, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO PREPARE A REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4, CHAP- TER 1, PART 2, 'LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972', BEING DIVISION 15, STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHTING FIXTURES, APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT WORK AND THE MAINTENANCE THEREOF IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CAL- IFORNIA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1992 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1993." Motion , second . So ordered. Recommendation to dopt..resoiut o 'ordering the prepara- tion of a report for the formation of a Crossing Guard Maintenance District during 1992-1993. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated February 4, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for further discussion later in the meeting. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-55 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF -THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO PREPARE A REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2, CHAP- TER 3.5, TITLE 5, OF 'THE CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (ACT OF 1974)', BEING DIVISION 2, OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,. FOR THE FOR- MATION OF A CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE' DISTRICT IN THE • (g) (h) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1,1992 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1993." Motion , second . So ordered. Recommendation torairolitti7oR approving Final Map #20620 for a three=unit oc ndominium at 1344 Manhattan Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 13, 1992. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-552. entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #20620 FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1344 MANHATTAN AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #22892 for a two -unit condominium at 1639 Prospect Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 13, 1992. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-552 7 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA—BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #22892 FOR A TWO - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1639 PROSPECT AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Recommendation to receive and file informational report regarding the procedures established for handling the Narcotics Asset and Forfeiture Fund. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated February 13, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for further discussion later in the meeting. Interim City Manager Wisniewski responded.to Council questions. re a N.. Action: To receive and file the informational report. Motionw, , second &. So ordered. • (j) Recommendation to adopt.IGresolutiofl of intent to ini- tiate a General Plan Arendment to the Circulation Ele- ment regarding the location of the coastal bicycle route. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 19, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember 9orri for further discussion later in the meeting. Planning Director Schubach and Interim Public Works Di- rector Glickman responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this � � � ).____, 6 .2 .)-----2..."--t- "-- i-----4, .--92_._.-, K--) %,.. ,-.?_y),___.._ 7 "'‘V)13 C5L) ) d Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-552_ entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH CITY OF HERMOSA 4i9 BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE CIR- CULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN REGARDING THE LOCA- TION OF THE COASTAL BICYCLE ROUTE." YeAa Motion , second . So ordered. w ,, - (k) / 7 NA -4.01 `✓ 1.116) Recommendation to receive and file report on parking enforcement policy. Memorandum from Interim City Man- ager Steve Wisniewski dated February 18, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for further discussion later in the meeting. Interim/ �i y Manager Wisniewski responded to Council questiq%S. 1) la) E,L 74�' /45 6-4" 0-9 /es"-, &y/CSII Action: To ti-- 6 0.,21•_ 1/(;) Recommendation to authorize the Mayor to sign a County Coroner Facility Tour and Autopsy Viewing Indemnifica- tion Agreement. Memorandum from Acting Chief of Police Val Straser dated February 19, 1992. Action: To authorize the Mayor to sign the Indemnifica- tion Agreement with the County Coroner, which adds lan- guage to the agreement which expressly excludes indemni- fication from our City where injuries to Hermosa Beach employees are caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of coroner employees, and limits the indemni- fication to the Service floor areas -(autopsy rooms) of the Coroners facility which arer'the most hazardous. Motion , second . `So ordered.` Y 0/9 /9 'y6 2: CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1 (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) , (e) , (f) , (g) , (h) , (i) , (j), (k), and (1) were heard at this time, but are shown in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Chuck and Missy Sheldon, 1800 The Strand, dated February 11, 1992, regarding dangerous and un- sightly storm drain exiting on the beach at 18th Street. Recommendation: to direct staff as appropriate. Interim Public Works Director Glickman responded to Council questions. (b) Action: To direct staff to review and'report back to Council on thea•manner and costs of, correcting the storm drain exiting'onthe beach at 18th Street. Motion , second . So ordered. Letter from Kevin M. Peterson, District Manager, General Telephone Company, dated January 27, 1992, regarding encroachment of existing public phones on public right- of-way. Recommendation: to direct staff as appropriate. Acting General Services Director Staten responded to ,} Council questions. 4% ....,0!/- - g....) /0 •_....) , /4"--/ g , ,-3___ a c ,e- a, ,... .,..„- ,„„).., ..„ . ‘,2 4 ri 71 op „rya__ ...} 4) C-ri .0)---).,...) ,)--1. E -a).>" ---Y, '*------/"4-‘ %%*-19 e--) g) .---‘1"-a_ j a '-t. el A".......-- — -/— ."'s. Action: To direct staff to review the matter and come 49/ %;) ©back to Council with a recommendation of those public ,„phones on public right of way that might be fa grandfathered and those that present a liability and should be moved. 7.7,-A------ Motion , second '4'57 = ? 6�� �--i PUBLIC HEARINGS - None MUNICIPAL MATTERS So ordered. problem 5. MID -YEAR BUDGET REVIEW FY 1991-92. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated February 19, 1992. -#/-Y to? Finance Director Copeland presented the staff report and / r re pondeAd to Council questions. "1;11/E -d -y 9.2-9-5 /iv), r (4:72 Action: To approve the revisions to estimated revenue, ,_.„0,0 --zip appropriations, budget transfers and designations as presented in the "City of Hermosa Beach Budget Summary, le�'o.--r , 1991-92 Midyear Review", consisting of revenue shortfall f� Eypo .41e Atg • caused by: 1) lower Sales Tax by 15%; 2) lower In -Lieu Motor Vehicles; 3) a state reduction of Police Fines and Forfeitures; 4) lower Parking Citations by 13%; and, 5) increased insurance costs for liability, worker's compensation, unemployment, property insurance and bonds; which cause a budget shortfall to: 1) General Fund of $398,001 2) Parking Fund revenue of $217,107; and, 3) Insurance Fund increases of $137,107, for a total revenue loss of $752,215. And, to reduce expenditures of: 1) General Fund by $350,145; 2) Parking Fund by $67,928; 3) Capital Improvement Projects by $48,128, 4) salary/retirement savings of $80,692; 5) conference/training by $34,492; 6) use State Gas Tax funds in place of General funds for a portion of street maintenance in the amount of $100,000; and, 7) transfer from the U.U.T. for Police Foot Patrol and Bootleg Enforcement of $70,830, for a total reduction of $752,215. Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of 6. PROPOSED ORDINANAMENDING DELINQUENT BUSINESS LICENSE BUSINESS WITHOUT A LICENSE. and Safety Director William 1992. THE PENALTY PROVISIONS FOR TAXES AND COMMENCEMENT OF Memorandum from Building Grove dated February 19, Building and Safety Director Grove presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. ,70%. & c.v 7d 7c) Action: To n'_t_ro3uce-Ordinance No. 92=10._64. Motion/27, second a 1""Th mot"ion'� ca'`r ied,noting the dissenting votes of. Final Action: Towaive f-urther ad reing of:Ordinan,ce No. c,92-1065,(entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO PENALTIES FOR DELINQUENCIES AND BUSINESS LICENSE TABES." l Motion /Y) , second iA) . - AYES: OLAj NOES: 7. REVIEW OF RECRUITMENT AND TESTING PROCEDURES. Memoran- dum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 18, 1992. Personnel Director Blackwood presented the staff report and responded to Council questions 11/fr. Z�Q') 7J ----dam v ✓ /� i %�� W �i , ✓/ — d� �3 Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: '?/ Action: To approve the staff recommendations to: 1) review the recruitment and testing procedures and provide input and direction; and, 2) request the Civil Service Board review the Person- nel Rules and Regulations, conduct Public Hearings, and make recommendations to the Council regarding: a) codifications, additions and amendments to the Rules; and, b) appropriate testing methods. Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of 8. PROPOSED INTERIM ORDINANCi TO PROHIBIT PROJECTS IN THE R-3 ZONE FROM -EXCEEDING 30 FEET IN HEIGHT WHILE THE HEIGHT STANDARD IS BEING STUDIED FOR MODIFICATION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 19, 1992. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. z "1604 -6,2( G ,�✓�� �� Actio To i x duce—rd nce No. 93-106 , Motion "` he -m tio " car'r d"1 ' (.1.0_44dissent ' n• m cond' votes o Fina] Action: �92-1 168 enti BEAC SUAN OF UILDI R-3 Z NE THAT E Motion second 0 i Towaive fur_fher readi g of Ord'i'na c" a No. d7`""AN-O • NANCE-O 'TA -CITY-O - : ERM• =A , EST=LI=:ING ORATORIUM G P ITS OR •1 SIDEN IAL =TRU THIRT 0) FEET HEIGH .' /2/1A) AYES: NOES: Gf f 36 6L/ il i ,........a.„----7 � ex/ 7-0. //'.(' / ..)._ 7; ,e _.) 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS kt) ;ems - CITY MANAGER Interim City Manager Wisniewski reported 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Adoption of resolution appointing a City Manager and approving an employment agreement. • (b) 111-fr' Action: To announce the appointment of as City Manager for the City of Hermosa Beach; approve and au- thorize the Mayor to sign an employment contract with Mr. commencing__; .' , 1992 th ough ; and toadopt Resolution No. 92-55218 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF -THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPOINTING A CITY MANAGER' AND APPROVING AN AGREE- MENT WITH ." k Motion k), seconde6 . The motion carried unanimously. 1)4 � a--�-- \ :721r-762, r/"..lp i 1,4 7L-Wr" ."" /4 6 - Memorandum from Planning Commission dated February , 1992, requesting that Council initiate a text amendment to the Municipal Code to make the sign ordinance a part of the zoning ordinance. Planning Director Schubach responded to Council questions. Gam.4�-70.-4) 2 yli,C2 Action: To -direct staff to return this item in its proper form for th City ?Council to initiate a text amendment to the Municipal Code to make the Sign Or- dinance a part of the Zoning Ordinance. Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of LA2A• ,z oz 0,/ 11. .ETHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possi (a) vlltra ` future agenda i Request by Mayor Midstokke for consideration of adding Beach Drive area to the current vacation proceedings planned for Prospect Avenue. Action: To discuss the item as presented. Motion , second . So ordered. (57'4IA' J 2� Gg #‘36r • t e r Action: To (b) Request by Mayor Midstokke for discussion of use of tem- porary banners in the City. Action: To discuss the item as presented. Motion , second . So ordered. Action: To (c) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for discussion of requesting staff to prepare a report on oil. (7.-40f it) Action: To discuss the item as presented. Motion , second �, oordered. � 1 ('--Q-. Action: To (d) •,...49 ---e‘ Request by Councilmember Edgerton for discussion on requesting staff and Planning Commission to review and make recommendations regarding parking on public right- of-ways adjacent to Beach Drive. Action: To take this item in conjunction with item 11(a). CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Howard Longacre - Wilma Burt - 1152 +une Williams - 2 ave Reimer - 802 erry Compton - 8 Shirley Cassell - Parker Herriott - 1221 Seventh Place, Seventh Street, 065 Manhattan Avenue Monterey Blvd., 32 Seventh Street, (�i_SC/4 611 Monterey� 224 Twenty-fourth Street, )�,) v Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive,6--w#) Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, �. Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, Edie Webber - 1210 Eleventh Street, Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, February 26, 1992, at the hour of j.A.:G}0?'P;.M. to the Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, March 10, 1992 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Deputy City Clerk r Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or oral- ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet com- pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be- gin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni- ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or- dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi- nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. - 35_2 ) wj, 6 # 9.7 -/e 6 5 "The most dangerous untruths are truths moderately distorted." -Georg Christoph Lichtenberg AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 25, 1992 - Council Chambers, City Hall MAYOR Kathleen Midstokke MAYOR PRO TEM Robert Essertier COUNCILMEMBERS Robert Benz Sam Y. Edgerton Albert Wiemans Closed Session - 7:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch INTERIM CITY MANAGER Steve Wisniewski CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart- ment, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Cham- ber of Commerce. During the meeting a packet also is available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL STUDENT OF THE MONTH: Laura Miller CERTIFICATES OF COMMENDATION: John Kirhoffen and Eric Arthur Martinez PROCLAMATION: American History Month, February, 1992 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". 1. (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on February 11, 1992. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Recommendation to receive and file the January, 1992 City Treasurers report. Recommendation to Wdoptresolutioa ordering the prepara- tion of a report for the formation of a Hermosa Beach Street Lighting District during FY 1992-1993. Memoran- dum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated February 4, 1992. Recommendation tora'dopt resolution' ordering the prepara- tion of a report fole formation of a Crossing Guard Maintenance District during 1992-1993. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated February 4, 1992.. Recommendation to4ad3pt resolutiog approving Final Map #20620 for a three=unit condominium at 1344 Manhattan Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 13, 1992. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #22892 for a two -unit condominium at 1639 Prospect Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 13, 1992. Recommendation to receive and file informational report regarding the procedures established for handling the Narcotics Asset and Forfeiture Fund. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated February 13, 1992. Recommendation to("dopt-a resolution of intent'to ini- tiate a General Plan Amendment to the Circulation Ele- ment regarding the location of the coastal bicycle route. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 19, 1992. (k) (1) Recommendation to receive and file report on parking enforcement policy. Memorandum from Interim City Man- ager Steve Wisniewski dated February 18, 1992. Recommendation to authorize the Mayor to sign a County Coroner Facility Tour and Autopsy Viewing Indemnifica- tion%Acjieement 4 Memorandum from Acting Chief of Police Val Straser dated February 19, 1992. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. (a) (b) * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. Letter from Chuck and Missy Sheldon, 1800 The Strand, dated February 11, 1992, regarding dangerous and un- sightly storm drain exiting on the beach .at 18th Street. Recommendation: to direct staff as appropriate. Letter from Kevin M. Peterson, District Manager, General Telephone Company, dated January 27, 1992, regarding encroachment of existing public phones on public right- of-way. Recommendation: to direct staff As appropriate. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. NONE MUNICIPAL MATTERS 5. MID -YEAR BUDGET REVIEW FY 1991-92. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated February 19, 1992. 6. PROPOSED VORDINANC AMENDING DELINQUENT—BUSINESS LICENSE BUSINESS WITHOUT A LICENSE. and Safety Director William 1992. THE PENALTY PROVISIONS FOR TAXES AND COMMENCEMENT OF Memorandum from Building Grove dated February 19, 7. REVIEW OF RECRUITMENT AND TESTING PROCEDURES. Memoran- dum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 18, 1992. 8. PROPOSED INTERIM ORDINANCE.TO PROHIBIT PROJECTS IN THE R-3 ZONE FROM EXCEEDING 30 FEET IN HEIGHT WHILE THE HEIGHT STANDARD IS BEING STUDIED FOR MODIFICATION. Memorandum. from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 19, 1992. 9. MISCELLANEOUS. ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - 3 - 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Adoption oftresblut of n appointing a City Manager and approving an-empioyment agreement. (b) Memorandum from Planning Commission dated February 4, 1992, requesting that Council initiate a text amendment to the Municipal Code to make the sign ordinance a part of the zoning ordinance. 11. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (a) Request by Mayor Midstokke for consideration of adding Beach Drive area to the current vacation proceedings planned for Prospect Avenue. (b) Request by Mayor Midstokke for discussion of use of tem- porary banners in the City. (c) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for discussion of requesting staff to prepare a report on oil. (d) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for discussion on requesting staff and Planning Commission to review and make recommendations regarding parking on public right- of-ways adjacent to Beach Drive. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT ACTION' SHEET ACTION SHEET REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 25, 1992 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 7:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY LAURA MILLER ROLL CALL: HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL STUDENT OF THE MONTH: Laura Miller CERTIFICATES OF COMMENDATION: John Kirhoffen and Eric Arthur Martinez PROCLAMATION: American History Month, February, 1992 ACCEPTED BY WILMA BURT ON BEHALF OF NSDAR. ANNOUNCEMENTS: MAYOR ANNOUNCED HERMOSA RELEAF PROJECT HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 29, 8 TO 10 A.M. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION HELENE FROST - RE. LETTER RECEIVED ABOUT SEVERAL TEMPORARY UNPER- MITTED SIGNS IN THE WINDOW ON THEIR PROPERTY. ESPECIALLY CON- CERNED ABOUT THE SIGNS MANY OF THE BUSINESSES HAVE PLACED IN THEIR WINDOWS REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF VALIDATED PARKING IN THE LOTS. BETTY RYAN - ITEM #8 RE. MORATORIUM ON R-3 HEIGHT LIMITS. FEELS ANYONE WHO IS GOING TO BE AFFECTED SHOULD BE ADVISED BY LETTER. ALSO, STATED THAT A MORATORIUM IS A MEASURE THAT DEALS WITH HEALTH AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY AND DOESN'T BELIEVE THIS IS- SUE MEETS THE CRITERIA. WILMA BURT OBJECTS TO MINUTES THAT REFLECT HER COMMENTS ON N.S.211 IN ONLY ONE SENTENCE, BUT GIVES MIKE D'AMICO A HALF PAGE. ALSO RE. ITEM 7, REPORT ON RECRUITMENT AND TESTING PROCEDURES, DID NOT ANSWER THE QUESTIONS SHE POSED LAST MEETING. WORST RE- PORT SHE HAS EVER SEEN. JIM LISSNER - WOULD LIKE TO REMIND CITIZENS AND COUNCIL THAT THE LAST CITY COUNCIL WAS CONSIDERING AN ORDINANCE RE. BANNER TOWING AIRPLANES LAST YEAR BUT IT HAS BEEN SITTING IN LIMBO EVER SINCE. SUGGESTS THAT H.B. PASS THE ORDINANCE AND URGE M.B. TO DO SAME. ALSO, IF CITIZENS OBSERVE HELICOPTERS BUZZING THE,BEACH. SUGGEST THEY CONTACT LISSNER AT 376-4626 AND HE WILL CALL BACK NEXT DAY WITH NAME OF COMPANY RESPONSIBLE, ETC. DAVE REIMER - QUESTIONS USING HEMET FIGURES FOR COMPUTER EQUIPMENT. FEELS ANY PURCHASE OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE REBID AND COME TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. ERIC CASTLEMAN - RE. STRAND RENOVATION. SAYS SKATEBOARDS CREATE MOST NOISE. WOULD SUGGEST WHILE PLANNING LOOK AT DECREASING PERPENDICULAR CRACKS WHEN REDESIGNING. MICHAEL DEVERE - REPRESENTING JERRY COMPTON RE. MORATORIUM. WANTS TO KNOW WHAT IS THE URGENCY AT THIS POINT. SUGGEST GRANDFATHERING ANY PROJECTS IN WORKS. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: MOTION RE/SE TO APPROVE REMAINDER OF CONSENT CALENDAR. SO ORDERED. Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on February 11, 1992. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. PULLED BY KM - REQUESTED WRITTEN EXPLANATION RE. WHY, OUT OF 11 ITEMS LISTED ON TENTATIVE AGENDA AT FEB. 11 MEETING, ONLY 2 MADE IT TO THIS AGEN- DA. MAJORITY ARE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ITEMS. THINKS THIS IS POOR AGENDA MANAGEMENT. SAID REALISTIC DATES SHOULD BE SET AND THEN PRODUCE THE ITEMS ON TIME. MOTION KM/RE TO RECEIVE AND FILE. SO ORDERED. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the January, 1992 City Treasurer's report. (e) Recommendation to adopt resolution ordering the prepara- tion of a report for the formation of a Hermosa Beach Street Lighting District during FY 1992-1993. Memoran- dum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated February 4, 1992. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-5520 (f) Recommendation to adopt resolution ordering the prepara- tion of a report for the formation of a Crossing Guard Maintenance District during 1992-1993. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated February 4, 1992. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-5521. (g) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #20620 for a three -unit condominium at 1344 Manhattan Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 13, 1992. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-5522. (h) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #22892 for a two -unit condominium at 1639 Prospect Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 13, 1992. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-5523. (i) Recommendation to receive and file informational report regarding the procedures established for handling the Narcotics Asset and Forfeiture Fund. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated February 13, 1992. PULLED BY RB - QUESTIONED HOW MONEY CAN BE USED. MOTION RB THAT ALL FLASH FUNDS OVER 3,000 COME TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. DIES FOR LACK OF SECOND. CITY MANAGER EXPLAINED PROGRAM COULD NOT WORK IN THAT MANNER. MOTION RB/RE TO RECEIVE & FILE. SO ORDERED. (7) Recommendation to adopt a resolution of intent to ini- tiate a General Plan Amendment to the Circulation Ele- ment regarding the location of the coastal bicycle route. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 19, 1992. PULLED BY KM - BRYAN O'MALLEY 3330 STRAND - MAINTAIN EXISTING BIKE PATH AND KEEP AWAY FROM THE STRAND. CONNECT THE HERMOSA AVE. PATH TO THE MAN- HATTAN PATH. HAS OBTAINED 62 SIGNATURES JUST SINCE THIS MORNING. REQUESTED COUNCIL TO RECEIVE AND FILE. STEVE DOWNING - 3129 STRAND, WROTE LETTER OBJECTING TO ANY CHANGE IN PATH. MOTION KM/AW TO RECEIVE AND FILE. OK 4-1 (SE -NO). MOTION RB/SE - ASK LACTC IF WE COULD HAVE FUNDS TO RENOVATE BOTH THE STRAND ABOVE 24TH STREET AND THE BIKE PATH ON HERMOSA AVENUE ABOVE 24TH STREET, WITHOUT REMOVING THE STAIRS. PREPARE QUES- TION IN WRITING TO LACTC. VOTE: 3-2 (KM/AW-NO). (k) Recommendation to receive and file report on parking enforcement policy. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated February 18, 1992. PULLED BY KM - SUGGESTED DISCUSSING ITEMS 11A AND 11D AT SAME TIME BECAUSE THEY INVOLVE SAME ISSUE. RE - QUESTIONS CURRENT POLICY ON BEACH DRIVE. MOTION SE/RE - TO DIRECT STAFF TO TAKE TO P.C. AND COME BACK WITH DIFFERENT ALTERNATIVES TO CHOOSE FROM FOR THE RIGHTS OF WAYS OFF OF BEACH DRIVE. (FOCUS ON ISSUE OF RIGHTS OF WAYS OFF BEACH DRIVE ONLY.) RE WOULD LIKE AMENDMENT THAT THIS BE GIVEN HIGH PRIORITY AND - 3 - BRING BACK WTIHIN 60 DAYS. AMENDMENT ACCEPTED BY SE. VOTE: OK 3-2 (KM/AW-NO). (1) Recommendation to authorize the Mayor to sign a County Coroner Facility Tour and Autopsy Viewing Indemnifica- tion Agreement. Memorandum from Acting Chief of Police Val Straser dated February 19, 1992. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Chuck and Missy Sheldon, 1800 The Strand, dated February 11, 1992, regarding dangerous and un- sightly storm drain exiting on the beach at 18th Street. Recommendation: to direct staff as appropriate. SHIRLEY CASSELL - QUESTIONED WHY THE SHELDON LETTER NOT SIGNED. KM/RE - MOTION TO SEND BACK TO STAFF FOR A REPORT BACK ON WHY THIS ONE DRAIN IS DIFFERENTFROMALL THE OTHERS ENDING IN THE MIDDLE OF THE BEACH. NO OBJECTIONS, SO ORDERED. (b) Letter from Kevin M. Peterson, District Manager, General Telephone Company, dated January 27, 1992, regarding encroachment of existing public phones on public right- of-way. Recommendation: to direct staff as appropriate. SHIRLEY CASSELL - WHY NOT CHARGE THE TELEPHONE CO. FOR THE USE OF SPACE FOR PHONES THAT ARE GRANDFATHERED. MOTION KM/AW - DIRECT STAFF TO COME BACK WITH THE PRIOR AGENDA ITEM ON THE TELEPHONE ISSUE, THE ACTIONS THAT WERE TAKEN, AND ALSO THE LOCATION OF THE 18 TELEPHONES IN QUESTION. STAFF TO DISCUSS WITH GTE AND GET BACK TO COUNCIL. OK 4-1 (RE -NO). PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. NONE MUNICIPAL MATTERS 5. MID -YEAR BUDGET REVIEW FY 1991-92. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated February 19, 1992. MOTION KM/RB TO APPROVE MID -YEAR BUDGET REVISIONS AND HAVE STAFF SET AN APPROPRIATE DATE FOR 92-93 BUDGET WORKSHOP. BENZ ASKED 4 FOR AMENDMENT TO MOTION TO ADD HAVING STAFF LOOK AT CONTRACT SER- VICES THAT CAN BE TRIMMED DOWN. MIDSTOKKE AGREED TO ADD TO MO- TION STAFF TO LOOK CAREFULLY AT CURRENT ONES AND WHAT WE ARE PAYING FOR THEM. OK 5-0. MOTION RE/AW TO RETAIN $50,000 FOR DATA PROCESSING AND TAKE THE MONEY FROM THE $200,000 FOR SCHOOL PROPERTY ACQUISITION FUND. OK 3-2 (SE/RB-NO). 6. PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING DELINQUENT BUSINESS LICENSE BUSINESS WITHOUT A LICENSE. and Safety Director William 1992. THE PENALTY PROVISIONS FOR TAXES AND COMMENCEMENT OF Memorandum from Building Grove dated February 19, MOTION KM/RE TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. 92-1065 WITH AMENDMENT TO WORDING ON LINE 23, PAGE 1 AND ON LINE 10, PAGE 2 TO CHANGE THE WORD "YEAR" TO "12 -MONTH PERIOD". OK 5-0. 7. REVIEW OF RECRUITMENT AND TESTING PROCEDURES. Memoran- dum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 18, 1992. MOTION KM/SE TO APPOINT A SUBCOMMITTEE OF COUNCILMEMBER BENZ AND MAYOR MIDSTOKKE TO REVIEW AND COME BACK TO COUNCIL WITH RECOMMEN- DATIONS ON CHANGES AND CLARIFICATIONS. SO ORDERED. 8. PROPOSED INTERIM ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT PROJECTS IN THE R-3 ZONE FROM EXCEEDING 30 FEET IN HEIGHT WHILE THE HEIGHT STANDARD IS BEING STUDIED FOR MODIFICATION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 19, 1992. THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE SPOKE IN OPPOSITION: SHIRLEY CASSELL. MICHAEL DEVERE. VIVA STROYKE. DID NOT IDENTIFY HIMSELF. OTTO PALMER. EDIE WEBBER. ERIC CASTLEMAN. JIM GALLAGHER. MOTION KM/AW TO RECEIVE AND FILE. MOTION FAILS 2-3 (SE/RB/ES- NO). MOTION RE/SE SEND TO P.C. TO HOLD HEARINGS TO REDUCE R-3 HEIGHT LIMIT TO 30'. OK 4-1 (AW -NO). 9. NONE 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Adoption of resolution appointing a City Manager and approving an employment agreement. MOTION AW/RB TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 92-5524 APPOINTING FREDERICK FERRIN AS CITY MANAGER AND APPROVING EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT COM- MENCING APRIL 20, NOTING OBJECTIONS OF KM AND AW. THANKED SW FOR BEING INTERIM MANAGER. KM EXPLAINED HER OBJECTION IS TO SOME OF THE TERMS OF AGREEMENT, BUT NOT TO APPOINTMENT OF FERRIN. RE APPROVES OF APPOINTMENT BUT OBJECTS TO SEVERAL TERMS OF EMPLOY- MENT. SE SPOKE HIGHLY IN FAVOR. AW - SPOKE IN FAVOR OF PACKAGE. OK 3-2 (KM/RE-NO). KM SAID THEY WILL BE HAVING SOCIAL FUNCTION WHEN HE ARRIVES- WILL ANNOUNCE LATER. (b) Memorandum from Planning Commission dated February 4, 1992, requesting that Council initiate a text amendment to the Municipal Code to make the sign ordinance a part of the zoning ordinance. MOTION KM/RE - SEND TO P.C. PURSUANT TO THEIR REQUEST, TO HOLD HEARINGS TO PLACE SIGN ORDINANCE IN ZONING CODE AND ALSO REVIEW FOR CLARIFICATION AND SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES IN CODE. SO ORDERED. MOTION KM/SE - TO DIRECT STAFF TO SUSPEND ENFORCEMENT ON UNPER- MITTED WINDOW SIGNS, KM WITHDREW MOTION AFTER RESPONSE BY BILL GROVE. MOTION RB TO PLACE A MORATORIUM ON SIGNS IN WINDOWS OF STORES. DIES FOR LACK OF SECOND. MOTION SE/RB - TO SUSPEND ENFORCEMENT ON ANY AND ALL WINDOW SIGNS WHILE THIS IS BEING STUDIED. FAILS 2-3 (KM/ES/AW-NO). MOTION RE/AW TO SUSPEND ENFORCEMENT ON ALL PAPER WINDOW SIGNS UP TO 25%. OK 4-1 SE -NO. 11. OTHER MATTERS —CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (a) Request by Mayor Midstokke for consideration of adding Beach Drive area to the current vacation proceedings planned for Prospect Avenue. DISCUSSED WITH ITEM 1(k). (b) Request by Mayor Midstokke for discussion of use of tem- porary banners in the City. KM OBJECTS TO THE AMOUNT OF THE BOND FOR TEMPORARY SIGNS. (c) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for discussion of requesting staff to prepare a report on oil. SE MOTION FOR STATUS REPORT ON OIL RE. STATE LANDS COMMISSION. SECOND RB. SW GAVE ORAL REPORT. (d) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for discussion on requesting staff and Planning Commission to review and make recommendations regarding parking on public right- of-ways adjacent to Beach Drive. HANDLED WITH ITEM 1(k). AW ASKED ABOUT USE OF RESERVE POLICE. WOULD LIKE A REPORT SHOW- ING HOW WE GET RESERVE OFFICERS, ETC. AW UNDERSTANDS CDR. ALTFELD IS PRESIDENT-ELECT OF KIWANIS. KM WANTS TO KNOW IF THERE IS A POLICY ON HOW MUCH TIME IS ALLOWED AWAY FROM JOB. BOB BLACKWOOD RESPONDED ON CITY POLICY. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. SHIRLEY CASSELL - COMPLAINED AGAIN ABOUT CITY PAYING SCHUBACH'S DUES FOR KIWANIS MEMBERSHIP. SHE ALSO ASKED ABOUT HEIGHT OF HOTEL ON STRAND, AND HOW LONG THE PERMIT IS GOING TO BE GOOD FOR, SINCE THEY STILL HAVE NOT COM- MENCED CONSTRUCTION. JUNE WILLIAMS - CONCERNED ABOUT MISINFORMATION GOING OUT ON CUP ENFORCEMENT. SHE STATED THERE ARE 1027 CURRENT BUSINESS LICENSES IN CITY, 122 OF WHICH REQUIRE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND 80 OF WHICH ARE ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CUPS, AND ONLY TWO NOT COMPLYING. JERRY COMPTON - THINKS MAIN PROBLEM ON CUP ENFORCEMENT IS COM- MUNICATION WITH ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. HE COMPLIMENTED CURRENT ENFORCEMENT OFFICER PATRICIA STOOPS ON HER METHODS OF OBTAINING COMPLIANCE. ALSO NOTED STRUCTURES BUILT IN TOWN FOR USE OF SKATEBOARDERS THAT ARE UNSAFE. ADJOURNMENT AT 12:05 A.M. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, February 11, 1992, at the hour of 7:39 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - The closed session was -held at 7:04 P.M. regard- ing matters of Personnel and matters of potential litigation: pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b). The closed ses- sion was recessed at 7:33 P.M. to the regular scheduled public meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Gene Dreher ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Wiemans, Mayor Midstokke Absent: None EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER: Laurice Duke, Secretary to City Manager/City Council Personnel Director Robert Blackwood presented a plaque to Laurie Duke, Secretary to the City Manager and City Council, to commemo- rate her selection as "Employee of the Quarter". Laurie has been a City employee since 1971, starting in the Building Department, and became the Secretary to the City Manager and Council in 1983. Laurie was honored for her consistently sustained high level of performance, the quality of her work and attendance, and for al- ways being available to meet the needs of staff and the public. ANNOUNCEMENTS - Mayor Midstokke announced that 'the Parks, Recre- ation and Community Resources Advisory Commission would hold a Special Meeting on Wednesday, February 19, 1992, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. in Room 12 of the Community Center to hold discussions on the South School site. She invited public participation at the meeting. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, 'reported that his Initiative Petition to zone the Biltmore site as a 100% Open Space Park had over 1,500 signatures to date; Terry Ward - 1719 Carver Lane, Redondo Beach, submitted a letter and requested the Council reconsider its action in deleting a lane in order to install a left turn pocket on east- bound Aviation at its intersection with Pacific Coast Highway for the Park Pacific Shopping Center, as he and his neighbors considered the situation dangerous; Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., concerned with item 1(b), Demands and Warrants; Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., concerned with the cost of parking permits, felt Hermosa's City Council Minutes 02-11-92 Page 7696 1111 were the highest in the state; Susan McFarlane - 25 Eighth Street, concerned with item no. 7, and asked the Council to evaluate the continued illegal parking on the corners'of the walk streets and Beach Drive; submitted letter; John McFarlane 25 Eighth Street, concerned with item no. 7, questioned the number of cars re- ported as parking illegally and claimed seven garages in one block were used for storage rather than parking; submitted letter; John Ryan - 229 Longfellow Avenue, requested a response to a letter he submitted regarding the hiring of the Public Works Director; Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, spoke in favor of the formation of a Police Commission; Tom Fowler - no address given, stated the Council should not hire Consultants; Sheila Donohue Miller - 77 17th Street, questioned if the City was going to require the removal of cars from the public right of way (item,no. 7), was it going to require the removal of patio furniture as well; Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, suggested that the Park, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meetings be televised, as it would only cost $778 to televise them for a year. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (h), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3 but are listed in order for clarity: (b) Benz, (f) Wiemans, and (h) Benz. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Wiemans. So ordered. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Special meeting of the City Council held on January 25, 1992; 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on January 28, 1991. 3) Special meeting of the City Council held on February 1, 1992. Action: To approve the minutes of January 25 and 28, 1992, and the minutes of February 1, 1992 as presented. (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. 39762 through 39820 inclusive and Nos. 39822 City Council Minutes 02-11-92 Page 7697 through 39826 :inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 39762, 39763, 39786, 39823, 39824, 39825, and 39826. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. Interim City Manager Wisniewski responded to Council questions and agreed to provide the procedure and policy for the use of "flash money" by the Police to Benz. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. So ordered. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) (e) (f) Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. Recommendation to receive and file the January, 1992 investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated February 4, 1992. Action: To receive and file the January, 1992 invest- ment report as presented. Recommendation to increase rental fees for Clark Build- ing for private parties and receptions. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated January 28, 1992. Action:' To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff recommendation to in- crease the fees for renting Clark Building for private parties and receptions to: 1) Fee per hour for private parties $ 30; 2) Cleanup/Damage deposit '250; and, 3) Booking Fee (non refundable) 100; and change the format by changing the title of the non refundable fee from maintenance fee to booking fee, in order to decrease confusion with the refundable clean- ing/maintenance fee. Recommendation to approve the request and contract for the 1992 Women's Pro Volleyball Tournament to be held on the Pier Courts June 13 and 14, 1992. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated January 29, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Wiemans for separate discussion later in the meeting, due to the concern for the need to limit the number of beach events per year. City Council Minutes 02-11-92 Page 7698 Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., concerned with set-up time, sales booths, and street closure; Sheila Donohue Miller - 77 17th Street, concerned with beach deed restrictions; and, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, concerned with City liability regarding bleacher inspection. Community Resources Director Rooney responded to Council questions by stating that the items to be sold were event related items, no food was to be sold, and staff had requested that Pier Avenue, from BeachDrive west, be blocked off for crowd safety. (g) (h) City Attorney Vose responded to Council questions by stating that the beach deed restrictions did not mention a ban on the sale of commercial items; and, the City would be liable in any event, particularly if they did not inspect the bleachers, this was the reason for the $2,000,000 additional insured policy requirement for the event organizers. Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to: 1) approve the request for a professional beach vol- leyball tournament to be held June 13 and 14, 1992, on the Pier Courts; and, 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the contract with the Women's Professional Volleyball Association (WPVA) to include City fees of $1,570 per day ($3,140 to- tal) and a $2,000,000 event liability certificate. Motion Wiemans, second Mayor Midstokke. The motion car- ried unanimously. Recommendation to approve request for 30 day extension of temporary appointment for the Acting General Services Director and one General Services Officer. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 5, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation as presented. Recommendation regarding "pilot project" for City Hall PC based Local Area Network Computer System. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated February 6, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. City Council Minutes 02-11-92 Page 7699 Interim City Manager Wisniewski responded to Council questions. Proposed Action: To not authorize the purchase of pe- ripheral components unless it comes back before Council for review. Motion Benz, Second Edgerton. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Essertier, Wiemans, and Mayor Midstokke. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) place the "pilot program" on hold pending comple- tion of the midyear budget reviews; and, ` 2) authorize the purchase of peripheral components (printers) as necessary, at an estimated cost not to exceed $5,000, to replace faulty equipment or to add equipment in order to facilitate City operations. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Wiemans. The motion car- ried, noting the dissenting votes of Benz and Essertier. The order of the agenda was suspended at 8:01 P.M. in order to go tocPitem no. 5, the public hearing. x5 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 92-1064 - AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO ALLOW DAY NURSERIES, PRESCHOOLS, AND AFTER SCHOOL CHILD CARE FACILITIES WITH THIRTEEN (13) OR MORE CHILDREN AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE R-1 ZONE, AND AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 10, OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOR GRANTING CONDITION- AL USE PERMITS FOR SUCH FACILITIES AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 1064. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Essertier. The motion carried noting the dissenting votes of Edgerton and Wiemans. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1(f), (b), and (h) were heard at this time, but are shown in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. The following item was pulled from the Consent Calendar of the January 14, 1992 meeting and continued from the January 28, 1992 meeting for discussion when all Councilmembers would be present. City Council Minutes 02-11-92 Page 7700 (o) Recommendation to approve reactivation of the Housing Improvement Program (HIP). Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 6, 1992. This item had been removed from the consent calendar of the January 14, 1992, meeting by Mayor Midstokke and was subsequently continued. Action: To receive and file. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Essertier. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (a) Letter from Wilma Burt, 1152 - 7th Street, received February 6, 1992, regarding People's Initiative N. S. 211. Recommendation: to direct staff as appropriate. Interim City Manager Wisniewski responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, questioned the definitions of certain terms used and asked the Council to meet to clarify the definitions; Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., spoke about the Civil Service procedures in Torrance; John Ryan - 229 Longfellow Avenue, questioned the procedures used in Hermosa Beach; and, Michael D'Amico - 559 Third Street, Hermosa Beach Civil'Service Board, stated that the Commission followed both the law and the spirit of N.S. 211; that 99% of the positions in Hermosa re- quired written tests for entry level; explained that Los Angeles County no longer does the testing for positions, therefore the City must hire private companies to supply the testing materials. He explained that for an executive management level position, written "tests are not the best assessment, rather an oral inter- view by an impartial panel will do a much bet- ter job. The City advertises in the papers; does quality assessment by records, pass or fail; has an oral interview by qualified non City personnel; then a ranking of those inter- viewed are certified for eligibility by the Civil Service Board, with the three top ranked names given to the department head for final selection. Mr. D'Amico also explained that neither Los Angeles City, Los Angeles County, nor the State of California have. written tests for executive management positions. Action: To have staff prepare a report detailing the procedures for hiring management as well as non - City Council Minutes 02-11-92 Page 7701 management personnel in order for the Council to deter- mine if correct procedures for N.S. 211 are being fol- lowed. The report would include input from the Civil Service Board. Motion Edgerton, second Wiemans. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Essertier and Mayor Midstokke. City Attorney Vose responded to Council questions by stating that the Ordinance N.S. 211 was ambiguous regarding a requirement for a written test for all personnel, but Council was within its dis- cretion to establish policy for that statute. He also stated that, in his opinion, the law was not being broken. Proposed Action: To move that all unsigned positions be put on hold until it is established by Council that the Code is being adhered to by everybody in the City, under Civil Service, with review of eligiblity lists and everything that is laid out in N.S. 211. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Edgerton, Essertier, Wiemans, and Mayor Midstokke. Proposed Action: To put on hold all future hires, ex- cluding those who have been made offers already, until the policy has been determined. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Essertier, Wiemans, and Mayor Midstokke. Proposed Action: To get a written legal opinion as to the legality of oral versus written examination and whether the City Attorney feels an oral interview is in fact an examination under N.S. 211, and if not, is the City liable. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Essertier, Wiemans, and Mayor Midstokke. Final Action: To close discussion on this item. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Wiemans. The motion car- ried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY THE REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE TWO LOTS INTO THREE LOTS FOR PROP- ERTY LOCATED AT 206 - 212 PROSPECT AVENUE. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 3, 1992, with Resolution for adoption. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Council Minutes 02-11-92 Page 7702 The public hearing was opened at 8:07 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Mark Lueker - 1265 Van Horne Lane, Hermosa Beach, appellant, spoke in favor of the project and stated that all lots would exceed the code re- quirements and be substantially larger than the average of the neighborhood; the project was to be three single family homes, not condominiums; that Reynolds was a one way street; and, the proposed subdivision met all City codes; Wilma Burt - 1252 Seventh Street, questioned street address number; Steven Godo Ikiss - 224 Prospect Ave., spoke in opposition; asked that people from Redondo Beach not be allowed to speak; Jackie Godo Ikiss - 224 Prospect Ave., spoke in opposition, stated she would lose privacy of her back yard; Steven Godo Ikiss, Sr. - 224 Prospect Ave., spoke in opposition; Jim Cauldwell - 1615 Armour Lane, Redondo Beach, spoke in favor, stated the project would open up the corner and provide more room for traffic turns; Jeannette Driscoll - Van Horne Lane, Redondo Beach, spoke in favor; Ernie (unable to hear last name) - 212 Prospect Avenue, spoke in favor; Wayne Murray - 1079 Loma Drive, formerly of Prospect, spoke in favor; Mike Joseph - 2106 Huntington Lane, Redondo Beach, spoke in . favor; Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., stated that the subdivision met the City codes; if the Council did not want to approve a subdivision that met the codes, then the Council should change the codes and not let information stay on the books that was misleading; Terry Boyd - 104 Barney Court, spoke in favor of the project as it would enhance property values; and Mark Lueker - 1265 Van Horne Lane, Hermosa Beach, appellant, stated the project would reduce the City liability and increase fire protection to the area. The public hearing was closed at 8:35 P.M. Action: To grant the appeal, overturn the Planning Com- mission decision, and adopt Resolution No. 92-5519, en- titled, HA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO OVERTURN THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THEREBY APPROVE VESTING TEN- TATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 23246 FOR THE DIVISION OF TWO EX- ISTING LOTS INTO THREE LOTS AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF City Council Minutes 02-11-92 Page 7703 PROSPECT AVENUE AND REYNOLDS LANE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 41 AND 42 AND THE EASTERLY 79 OF LOT 43, HERMOSA HEIGHTS TRACT." Motion Essertier, second Edgerton. The motion carried unanimously. The meeting recessed at 8:42 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:57 P.M. HEARING 6. APPROVAL OF STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH PLANS, INCLUDING THE REPAIR OF STRAND BIKEWAY ON THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND THE NORTH CITY LIMIT; A NEW ALIGNMENT AT 35TH STREET; WIDENING OF 24TH STREET BETWEEN THE STRAND AND HERMOSA AVENUE; AND AN ASPHALT OVERLAY OF THE BIKEWAY BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET. (Continued from January 28, 1992 meeting.) Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated February 6, 1992. Supplemental letter from Sue and John Horger, 2216 The Strand, dated February 11, 1992. Interim Public Works Director Glickman presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The hearing opened at 9:40 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, urged the Council to use the $400,000 grant and not lose it; concerned with one plan to pour the slab without rebar and questioned what would keep any cracked area from rising and causing a safety hazard; questioned if the residents had been polled to determine if they wanted a pointed top edge to the Strand wall to keep people from sitting on the wall; questioned how bicycles would be kept from using the Strand north of 24th Street; Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., one of five architects who met to submit a drawing showing suggestions for "bulb" areas at the end of walk streets for lighting, trash receptacles, seat- ing, etc.; stated that the group would be will- ing to donate time for design work on the Strand walk/bikeway in order to use the LACTC grant, as it was really citizen tax money that would be spent; felt the new wall should be poured concrete rather than cement block; con- cerned with east (private) Strand walls, as some were built over the public walkway and could fall or sink when the present walkway is cut in order to pour a new walkway; felt the bikepath should continue on the Strand to the City Council Minutes 02-11-92 Page 7704 north City boundary, also felt input from prop- erty owners was needed; John Ryan - 229 Longfellow Avenue, questioned if only a portion of the LACTC grant could be en- cumbered in order to qualify; questioned the status of an extension request; Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, agreed with most points made by Jerry Compton; felt the northern bikeway connection with Manhattan Beach would be a comfortable 5% grade; con- cerned with the eastern (private) Strand wall and felt an underpinning detail should be in- cluded with the plans; suggested that the Coun- ty might recognize a contract for engineering services as an encumbrance on the grant funds; questioned the supervision costs cited; Gene Spencer - 142 Monterey Blvd., licensed heavy contractor, stated that he felt the plans were inadequate and offered to critique the plans to make them more specific; (was given a set of plans by Mr. Glickman); June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, felt that staff had worked hard and done a good job; asked that Mr. Glickman be given an opportunity to respond to criticism; Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, felt that staff work was inadequate; Dana Shaw - 913 Fifth Street, questioned City business procedure; and, Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., felt that any damage caused to private walls placed on top of the current Strand slab should be repaired at private expense and not by the City. The hearing was closed at 10:05 P.M. Action: To approve staff option no. 2: to go before the LACTC and request a time extension for the grant, due to concerns of possible inadequacy of the plans and to al- low the new City Manager be involved with the project. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Edgerton. The motion carried unanimously. Action: To direct the Planning Commission to make a General Plan Amendment to redesignate the bikepath from 24th Street to the north end of the Strand and delete it from Hermosa Avenue in order to be eligible for LACTC funds to repair the entire Strand. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Wiemans and Mayor Midstokke. City Attorney Vose stated that that the General Plan Amendment may need a Resolution of Intention from the Council, and if it did, he would bring it back on the next consent calendar. City Council Minutes 02-11-92 Page 7705 The normal order of the agenda was returned with item 2(a) heard next. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. VEHICLE PARKING ON UNIMPROVED STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY IN- CLUDING PEDESTRIAN WALK STREETS. Memorandum from Inter- im Public Works Director William Glickman dated February 5, 1992. Supplemental letter from Roger Creighton, 1070 Third Street, dated February 11, 1992. Interim Public Works Director Glickman presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To direct staff to begin the review of vacation proceedings for the area that would be easiest to do first. The motion was amended to make Prospect Avenue the area to be studied first. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Essertier. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Edgerton and Wiemans. City Attorney Vose stated that the procedure to be followed under the Streets and Highways Code would be to bring back a Resolution of a Notice of Intention to Vacate, which would establish a public, hearing date as part of the Resolution. It would require notification of the properties along the area to be vacated, also posting, then it would come back before the City Council as part of a public hearing. Then, if Council wanted to go forward, there would be another Resolution, which would be the Resolution of Vacation, with reservations of easements, or whatever the City Council desired at that point. Proposed Action: To enforce the parking code on the walk streets east and west of Beach Drive. Motion Essertier. The motion failed due to the lack of a second. Proposed Action: To enforce the parking laws in Hermosa Beach. Motion Essertier, second Wiemans. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Benz, Edgerton, and Mayor Midstokke. Further Action: To direct the City Manager to prepare a report stating the current City parking enforcement policy regarding private parking on City owned right of way. Motion Edgerton, second Essertier. So ordered. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - None 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL City Council Minutes 02-11-92 Page 7706 (a) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 5, 1992, regarding 1) the joint workshop meet- ing between the City Council, Planning Commission and School Board; and 2) the joint meeting of the City Coun- cil, Planning Commission and Chamber of Commerce. Planning Director Schubach responded to Council questions. Action: Mayor Midstokke, with the consensus of the Council, directed to approve the date of March 26, 1992 for a special joint workshop meeting with the Hermosa Beach School Board and the Planning Commission, with the agenda to include: 1) use of the Greenbelt as garden or nature study area; 2) traffic circulation adjacent to schools; 3) South School site. She recommended that the Parks, Recreation and Community Resource Advisory Commission be invited to attend the meeting since most items suggested by the Planning Com- mission are of primary concern to their Commission. Coming forward to respond to Council questions was: Wesley Bush - Hermosa Chamber of Commerce, stated that the date of May 14, 1992 would be best for the Chamber. Action: Mayor Midstokke, with the consensus of the council, directed to approve the date of May 14, 1992 for the special joint workshop meeting with the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce and the Planning Commission, with the agenda to include: 1) downtown parking; 2) ventilation of the City Council Chambers (for exam- ple, consideration of -windows),. She asked the Chamber to inform the City of the items they wished to discuss in time for public noticing. 10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request by Councilmember Edgerton to have staff provide a short history of subdivision of Biltmore site and re- cent lot merger actions city-wide. (Continued from January 28, 1992 meeting.) Action: To discuss the item as presented. Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Midstokke. So ordered. Final Action: To direct staff to include a history of the subdivision of the site, as well as recent lot mergers in the City, in any report to the Council when City Council Minutes 02-11-92 Page 7707 (b) the Biltmore site returns for Council action. Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Midstokke. So ordered. Request by Councilmember Edgerton to direct staff to prepare an agenda item regarding business license fees and tax penalties. (Continued from January 28, 1992 meeting.) Action: To discuss the item as presented. Motion Edgerton, second Essertier. So ordered. Proposed Action: To direct the City Attorney to prepare a memorandum, if any additional information needs to be written by him, other than what he has already written, so that it may be determined at a later date, by regular hearing, whether it be necessary to amend this provision to make it more in line with the Government Code. Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Midstokke. The motion was withdrawn by the maker. Final Action: To direct staff to bring back the Or- dinance for possible amendments and conformity with State law; and, to suspend all enforcement on current businesses while the process is undergoing review. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Edgerton. So ordered. City Attorney Vose stated that he would prepare the Ordinance following some guidelines. CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council at this time' were: Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., felt the Council should vacate the street right of way, discussed in item no. 7, and give or sell it to the adjacent property owners; concerned with Hotel Hermosa banner; June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, commented that the parking permits also included free parking at the yellow meters and therefore were quite reasonable; that Councilmembers were elected to set policy only and needed the ex- pertise of consultants; a Police Commission, if created, would need to be included in the Municipal Code; and all financial payments are audited; Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, concerned about the need for an adequate computer system; Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., felt the parking permit costs were out of line; Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., concerned about the street vacations and felt the Planning Department should work with the Public Works Department on the study directed by Council in item no. 7; and, City Council Minutes 02-11-92 Page 7708 Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, questioned if street easement vacations would allow owners to include the vacated property in their required setbacks and thus be able to build houses closer to the street than allowed now; stated that this would change the character of the neighborhoods and also place the valuation much higher than if it were not allowed to be used as part of the setback. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday, February 11, 1992, at the hour of 11:55 P.M. to the Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, February 25, 1992 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. 0.20,6711.41. dLee_NS Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 02-11-92 Page 7709 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME_ 14:33:05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/1-16 TO 1-31-92 CITY OF HERMOSA PEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/13/92 - VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # . - . --- -AMOUNT -- DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/1-16 TO 1-31-92 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 PAYROLL/1-16 TO 1-31-92 02/03/92 00243 02/03/92 00243 02/03/92 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 PAYROLL/1-16 TO 1-31-92 02/03/92 001-202-0000-2030 00465 3241,763.19 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 105-202-0000-2030 00260 58,257.97 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 109-202-0000-2030 00058 110-202-0000-2030 00262 31, 247. 90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 341, 707. 43 /ACCRUED PAYROLL H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 145-202-0000-2030 00255 *2,057.65 PAYROLL/1-16 TO 1-31-92 02/03/92 /ACCRUED PAYROLL H H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 PAYROLL/1-16 TO 1-31-92 02/03/92 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/1-16 TO 1-31-92 155-202-0000-2030 00256 53,996.54 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00243 160-202-0000-2030 00253 36,482.52 02/03/92 /ACCRUED PAYROLL H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/1-16 TO 1-31-92 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/1-16 TO 1-31-92 PAGE 0001 DATE 02/13/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # l AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00243 170-202-0000-2030 00110 319,018.24 02/03/92 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00243 305-202-0000-2030 00015 3122.99 02/03/92 /ACCRUED PAYROLL HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 PAYROLL/1-16 TO 1-31-92 02/03/92 705-202-0000-2030 00217 *5,131.23 /ACCRUED PAYROLL *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************************** **** 3329,785.66 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RESERVE AB702/DEC 91 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/DEC 91 H 00026 001-203-0000-2512 00001 01/27/92 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00563 01/27/92 RETIREMENT PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 RETIREMENT/DEC .91 01/27/92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS., 00026 RETIREMENT ADVANCE/JAN92 02/11/92 001-400-1213-4180 00564 RETIREMENT 001-400-1213-4180 00565 RETIREMENT 365,284. 18CR /P. E. R. S. ADJ AB 702 $94,464.58 /RETIREMENT $39, 017. 29CR /RETIREMENT *38,062.26 /RETIREMENT $0.00 $0.00 30. 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 39821 02/13/92.' 39821 02/13/92H ' 39821 02/13/92 39821 02/13/92i J 39821,. 02/13/92 . 39821 02/13/92 39821 30.00 02/13/92' $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 39821 LI 02/13/92' 39821 02/13/92;- 39821 I I9 02/13/92 J 39761 02/13/92 39761 02/13/92 39761 02/13/92 39894 ' 02/13/92', 9 ti FINANCE—SFA340 TIt•IE 14:33:05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H H H H H H H H H H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/DEC 91 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/DEC 91 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/DEC 91 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/DEC 91 CITY OF HERMOSA REACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/13/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00026 107-400-2601-4180 00168 41,142.09 01/27/92 STREET LIGHTING /RETIREMENT 00026 109-400-3301-4180 00038 01/27/92 VEH PKG DIST 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00171 01/27/92 PARKING ENF PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 RETIREMENT/DEC 91 01/27/92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 91 01/27/92 RETIREMENT/DEC PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 RETIREMENT/DEC 91 01/27/92 145-400-3401-4180 00144 DIAL A RIDE 145-400-3402-4180 ESEA 00144 145-400-3403-4180 00093 BUS PASS SUBSDY $172.10 /RETIREMENT 45,207.79 /RETIREMENT $203. 26 /RETIREMENT $71.71 /RETIREMENT $19. 31 /RETIREMENT PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 145-400-3408-4180 00013 $15 91 RETIREMENT/DEC 01/27/92 COMMUTER XPRESS /RETIREMENT PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/DEC 91 00026 155-400-2102-4180 00143 01/27/92 CROSSING GUARD PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 91 01/27/92 RETIREMENT/DEC 160-400-3102-4180 00169 SEWER/ST DRAIN 03 PAGE 0002 DATE 02/13/92 INV/REF PO # CHK #, AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $0.00 $0.00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0.00 $128. 94 /RETIREMENT $938. 55 /RETIREMENT PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 170-400-2103-4180 00043 $4,607.37 RETIREMENT/DEC 91 01/27/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /RETIREMENT PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/DEC 91 00026 705-400-1209-4180 00093 01/27/92 LIABILITY INS 00026 705-400-1217-4180 00093 01/27/92 WORKERS COMP $273. 32 /RETIREMENT $380. 60 /RETIREMENT *** VENDOR TOTAL***tr#*#**#•ntr-n******atr##tt*#-»#***#***n**-u*#a*****a*#**• **tt**#**n**x*## $41, 385. 44 H WARD — THK 03937 705-400-1209-4324 00247 $23,750.00 SETTLEMENT/JURUN 02/11/92 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL •a*#***- ****. *-x*• *a****•n**- **#****- ***#* atr*****tr a#** w*;t*** a***.. - u. * $23, 750. 00 **a PAY CODE TOTAL•a***a#it•*a*•nuit*•k*#a*#*##i►*#**##»nater*##************************** i $394, 921. 10 R A Y,. E TROPHIES 02744 001-400-1101-4319 00125 $20.80 MISC. CHARGES/FEB 92 10647 02/04/92 CITY COUNCIL /SPECIAL EVENTS 39761 02/13/92 39761 02/13/92 39761 �' 02/13/92 39761 .:1V13/92, 39761 02/13/92' 1 39761 02/13/92! 39761 02/13/92.1 39761 $0.00 02/13/92 39761 1. $0.00 02/13/92 39761' 02/13/2, 39761 $0.00 02/13/92 39761 $0.00 02/13/92' $0. 00 I , • 03091 39893 - $0.00 02/13/92 10647 00022 $0. 00 39897 I: 02/13/92'1 02,1 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 14:33:05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/13/92 VND # — ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # .. ... AMOUNT -- DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL##***tt#****#**#****#**#ff*tt**##x#*##*-n*#***#***cru***#*#*tr###**ir###n## R AMERICAN INSURANCE SERV GROUP 03409 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 02/04/92 PACE 0003 DATE 02/13/92 'INV/REF PO # CHK #' AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $20. 80 705-400-1209-4201 00246 $500.00 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ** VENDOR TOTAL **?r*xtr**- ***** *?t*Ott********#ar*#******-n*****#**#***#ar****#**aatat**#** R R R R R R BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY, INC. GARAGE 4)IJOR REPAIR/CITY 8774 BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY, INC. GARAGE DOOR REP/CTY YRD 8774 BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY, GARAGE DOOR REP/CTY YRD $500. 00 01889 001-400-3103-4309 01305 $196.69 01/21/92 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01889 001-400-3104-4309 00803 01/21/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY INC. 01889 001-400-4204-4309 02244 $196. 79 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $196. 79 8774 01/21/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY, INC. 01889 GARAGE DOOR REP/CTY YRD 8774 01/21/92 BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY, INC. 01889 GARAGE DOOR REP/CTY YRD 8774 01/21/92 BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY, INC. 01889 GARAGE DOOR REPAIR/CITY 8774 01/21/92 001-400-6101-4309 01182 $196.68 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 105-400-2601-4309 00782 $196.79 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 160-400-3102-4309 00678 $196.79 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL*###**##**##*####at*#-»**#**-n**###***#***#:n#*#*#***###***##u***#***### $1,180.53 03084 $0. 00 8774 03637 $205. 92 8774 03637 $206. 04 8774 03637 $206. 04 8774 03637 $205. 92 8774 03637 $206. 04 8774 03637 $206. 04 R BLICKMAN, INC. 03092 001-400-4601-4201 01202 $203.00 ' 03740 THEATRE TECH/1-29 TO 2-1 02/04/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL***#*#*#-n****#*****#*#*#*##*##*#*****#*#***##******#***#**********a* $203.00 R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00158 001-400-3103-4201 00384 $3,135.52 920100-0037002 00004 DUMP CHARGES/JAN 92 37002 01/31/92 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL±r**#***#*##tr*#*#*#*#**#*****##*******#*#**##*#**###**#*****n*##***:a# $3,135.52 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/2-1 TO 2-7 02016 001-400-2101-4305 02/06/92 POLICE 01696 $59.25 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 39898 +" I 02/13/92'1'P' 39899 Ig 02/13/92' 39899 i=' 02/13/92 39899 02/13/92 39899 'j 02/13/921 39899 ! „i 02/13/92 , J 39899 : 1 02/13/92 39900 02/13/92 39901 02/13/921'' 03843 39902 $0. 00 02/13/92. FINANCE--SFA340 TIME 14:33:05 PAY VENDOR NAME-- DESCRIPTION AME-...DESCRIPTION R R R R R R R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/2-1 TO 2-7 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/2-1 TO 2-7 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/13/92 VND # - ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN #- - -''AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02016 001-400-2201-4305 00531 02/06/92 FIRE 02016 001-400-2401-4309 00188 02/06/92 ANIMAL CONTROL GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 PETTY CASH/2-1 TO 2-7 02/06/92 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/2-1 TO 2-7 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/2-1 TO 2-7 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/2-1 TO 2-7 001-400-3104-4309 00802 TRAFFIC SAFETY 02016 001-400-4101-4316 00250 02/06/92 PLANNING 02016 001-400-4601-4305 01033 02/06/92 COMM RESOURCES 02016 001-400-6101-4309 01181 02/06/92 PARKS PAGE 0004 DATE 02/13/92 INV/REF PO 1# CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1.50 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $2.76 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $8.00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $45.00 /TRAINING $8. 00 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $14.00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 105-400-2601-4309 00781 321.62 PETTY CASH/2-1 TO 2-7 02/06/92 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/2-1 TO 2-7 03843 39902 $0.00 02/13/92 03843 39902 - p $0.00 02/13/92 03843 39902 I,.. u 30. 00 02/13/92 03843 39902 $0.00 02/13/92' 03843 39902 j. $0.00 02/13/92 03643 39902 $0.00 02/13/92 03843 39902 $0.00 02/13/92' 39902 'A 02016 305-400-6144-4201 00009 $20.22 03643 02/06/92 CIP 90-144 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************###**#****#*##****a** ********#*#*#*##***#********r $180.35 R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. 00599 001-400-3101-4201 00104 $3,800.00 MEDIAN MAINT/JAN 92 01/31/92 MEDIANS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL ****?rir?ttr*******tr***eras**#***»*#***#**?r**#*#*#**a►*ar#***#x*a****ar#ar*#** $3,800.00 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT 00389 001-400-2101-4305 01695 $45.95 MISC_ CHARGES/:JAN 92 4764 01/31/92 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTALt***a**#*#******a**#*#***#a***-»#************-n*a*x************#*****# R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENTAL/JAN 92 00153 01/31/92 R CINTAS CORPORATION 00133 UNIFORM RENTAL/JAN 92 01/31/92 001-400-4202-4187 00194 PUB WKS ADMIN 110-400-3302-4187 00326 PARKING ENF 345. 95 $489.60 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $42.00 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 00044. 30. 00 02/13/92 39903 02/13/921 4764 00112 39904 Ir $0.00 02/13/92; 00002 39905 $0.00 02/13/92 00002 39905 j $0.00 02/13/92: FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:33:05 i PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/13/92 PAGE 0005 DATE 02/13/92 VND # -' -ACCOUNT NUMBER ' - TRN #- .- .. ---AMOUNT' _._ .. ....INV/REF PO # CHK #H DATE INVC - PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************************************a 14 N R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN 92 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN 92 R CON LONG 54424 54424 00017 01/28/92 00017 01/28/92 SYSTEMS, INC 00017 DISTANCE/JAN 92 54424 01/28/92 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN 92 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN 92 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN 92 001-400-1121-4304 00477 CITY CLERK 001-400-1141-4304 00495 CITY TREASURER 001-400-1201-4304 00531 CITY MANAGER 00017 001-400-1202-4304 00545, 54424 01/28/92 FINANCE ADMIN 00017 001-400-1203-4304 00549 54424 01/28/92 PERSONNEL 00017 001-400-1206-4304 00448 54424 01/28/92 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN 92 54424 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN 92 54424 00017 01/28/92 00017 01/28/92 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN 92 54424 R COt1 SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN 92 54424 00017 01/28/92 00017 01/28/92 DATA PROCESSING 001-400-1207-4304 00360 BUS LICENSE 001-400-2101-4304 00968 POLICE 001-400-4101-4304 00549 PLANNING 001-400-4202-4304 00573 PUB WKS ADMIN R COM SYSTEMS, ,INC LONG DISTANCE/JAN 92 00017 001-400-4601-4304 00641 54424 01/28/92 COMM RESOURCES R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 LONG DISTANCE/JAN 92 54424 01/28/92 R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 LONG DISTANCE/JAN 92 54424 01/28/92 105-400-2601-4304 00196 STREET LIGHTING 110-400-3302-4304 00551 PARKING ENF $531.60 $6. 44 /TELEPHONE $8.87 /TELEPHONE $15.40 /TELEPHONE $16.05 /TELEPHONE 326. 85 00654424 00117 $0.00 39906 02/13/92 00654424 00117 39906 $0.00 02/13/92..4' 00654424 00117 39906 30.00 02/13/92 00654424 00117 39906 ' $0.00 02/13/92; ' 00654424 00117 39906 /TELEPHONE $0.00 02/13/92• $20.61 00654424 00117 39906 i /TELEPHONE $0.00 02/13/92. 31.99 00654424 00117 39906 ;', /TELEPHONE $0.00 02/13/92 ' $317.24 00654424 00117 39906 ! /TELEPHONE $0.00 02/13/92; 315.34 00654424 00117, 39906 /TELEPHONE $0.00 02/13/92. $34.13 00654424 00117 39906 ! /TELEPHONE $0.00 02/13/92; $34.68 /TELEPHONE $10.09 /TELEPHONE $34.29 /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************4************************************* $541.98 R CHRISLYN*CROSS 04512 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 30641 02/06/92 001-210-0000-2110 04702 00654424 00117 39906 •� $0.00 02/13/921-j 00654424 00117 $0.00 39906 02/13/92 00654424 00117 39906 ! $0.00 02/13/92 I 1 ,,f $400.00 30641 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 03836 39907 ,. $0.00 02/13/92 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:33:05 PAY ' VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/13/92 PAGE 0006 DATE 02/13/92 VND # ----ACCOUNT "ACCOUNT NUMBER - TRN #--' -'.- - - --- AMOUNT - - INV/REF PO DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL - *** ********************************rn**7*** ** *************- **** $400.00 # CHK 4$ . AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R DANIEL FREEMAN LAX MED. CLINIC 02390 705-400-1217-4201 00134 331.98 001291-29 030226 WORK COMP EXAM/COCHRAN 91-29 09/20/91 WORKERS COMP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************4************ ****************** $31.98 R DAPPER TIRE CO. 01390 001-400-2101-4311 01349 $952.80 MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 01/31/92 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $952.80 R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE °r. 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00180 $95.29 SHELTER COSTS/JAN 92 02/10/92 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R $95.29 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES 00440 001-400-4202-4305 00672 $16.15 PUBLICATIONS/PUB WORKS 38671 02/12/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $16.15 R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY MAINT/DEC 91 20500 R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY MAINT!DEC 91 20500 00267 001-400-3104-4251 00090 01/28/92 $655.03 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 30. 00 39908 --co 02/13/921 00119 39909 $0.00 02/13/92! 00014 $0.00 39910 02/13/921 38671 02091 39911 $0.00 02/13/92; 120500 03678. $0.00 39412 ' o 02/13/92; 00267 105-400-2601-4251 00156 $655.04 120500' 03678 39912 01/28/92 STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 02/13/921 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,310.07 R THE *DEVELOPMENT 00147 001-400-2101-4306 01125 $33.72 I MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 -5944. 01/31/92 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $33.72 1-5944 00120 39913 $0.00 02/13/92: DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 00269 001-400-2101-4201 00952 $456.32 251682092 00006 39914 COMPUTER MAINT/FD/FEB 92 82092 . IJ 02/06/92 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/FRIVAT $0.00 02/13/92' FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:33:05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION * * * I R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS R DIGITAL EGUIPMENT CORPORATION COMPUTER MAINT/PD/FEB 92 82092 VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/13/92 PAGE 0007 DATE 02/13/92 _J VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN.# AMOUNT------INV/REF PO # CHK it.: DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP :. , .1 00269 001-400-2201-4201 00284 • $304.22 251682092 00006 39914 kl • -.0 02/06/92 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/13/92' ******************************************************************** $760. 54 R DIVE N' SURF 00604 001-400-2201-4309 01241 $40.00 48349/50 00121 MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 49/50 01/31/92 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $40. 00 R EASY READER 00181 001-400-1121-4323 00179 $467.78 0268 PUBLIC NOTICING/JAN 92 0268 01/31/92 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** *467. 78 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS DISCOUNT OFFERED R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS DISCOUNT TAKEN R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHARGES/JAN 92 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 39915 02/13/9214'3 . ...•: LL! ) 00126 39916 $0.00 02/13/92 00165 001-202-0000-2021 00146 $93.47 00127 39917 i J 01/31/92 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 02/13/92; • 00165 001-202-0000-2022 00146 $93.47CR 00127 39917 !. 01/31/92 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 02/13/92 j 00165 001-400-2101-4311 01348 $866.77 00127 39917 1 , 01/31/92 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 02/13/92 -1 00165 001-400-2201-4311 00422 $3.06 00127, 39917 r 01/31/92 FIRE /AUTO MAINTENANCE' c• $0.00 02/13/92 -". :Ho 00165 001-400-2401-4311 00262 $28.79 4 00127 39917 1" 01/31/92 ANIMAL CONTROL /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 02/13/921 Ire • kr MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 R EDDINGS BROTHERS 00165 001-400-3103-4311 00730 $677.93 00127 39917 01/31/92 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 02/13/92 00165 001-400-4101-4311 00155 $26.21 00127 39917 01/31/92 PLANNING /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 02/13/92 -I i 001-400-4202-4311 00206 $7.35 00127 39917 AUTO PARTS 00165 MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 01/31/92 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 • • 01/31/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 02/13/92 001-400-4205-4309 00622 $1,776.44 00127 39917 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 02/13/92 -1 ...I FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 14:33:05 CITY OF HERMOSA LEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0008 FOR 02/13/92 DATE 02/13/92 PAY VENDOR NAME------- — — --- --- VNO # -- -- --ACCOUNT NUMBER' ' -TRN # AMOUNT ----- INV/REF ' PO # CHK DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-4205-4311 00259 $310.42 MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 01/31/92 EQUIP SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00127 $0.00 39917 J 02/13/92' R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-6101-4311 00271 $500.19 00127 39917 p MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 01/31/92 PARKS /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 02/13/92 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 105-400-2601-4311 00251 $34.89 MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 00127 39917 1.444 01/31/92 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 02/13/92 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 110-400-3302-4311 00764 $312.54 00127 39917 MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 01/31/92 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 02./13/92 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 160-400-3102-4311 00196 $35.42 00127 39917 kMISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 01/31/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 02/13/92' *** VENDOR TOTAL *****aratjr*************ar****************************************#- *** . $4, 580. 11 R EFRAM MOBIL 01400 001-400-2101-4310 00346 $104.00 MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 66063 01/31/92 POLICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES ***,VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************* $104.00 R EQUITABLE INSURANCE CO OF IOWA 00830 001-400-1212-4188 02312 $4,159.00 ANNUAL PREMIUM/DILLER 04851 02/10/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL************:n********************.********************************** $4,159.00 N266063 00128 $0.00 39918 J 02/13/92', EU04851 03090 39919 1 , $0.00 02/13/92'1 R EXECUTIVE—SUITE SERVICES INC. 01294 001-400-4202-4201 00354 $1,460.00 JANITOR SERV/JAN 92 00039$0 39920/1/ j' 01/31/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/FRIVAT $0.00 02!13/92'' *** VENDOR TOTAL*****'*************************************************************** $1,460.00 R FAIRCHILD PUBLICATIONS 04510 001-300-0000-3418 00425 $104.50 32934 03745 39921 SPEC EVENT PERMIT REFUND 32934 02/10/92 1"'!' /SPECIAL EVENTS $0.00 02t13/92' M1 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $104.50 W. M.*GLICKMAN & ASSOCIATES 04288 001-400-3103-4201 00385 $786.50 INTERIM PUB WKS DIR/JAN 01/31/92 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/FRIVAT 00071 39922 L. J $0.00 02/13/92., -J CIP p/wAwcs-srA340 TIME 14:33:05 PAY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/13/92 VENDOR mAMs'--------------'----vwo #-- ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN -"--AMOUNTr-- e W. m.°oLIoxmAw u ASSOCIATES 0428e INTERIM PUB WKS DIR/JAN 01/31/92 n W. m.°oLIowmAw & ASSOCIATES INTERIM PUB WKS DIR/JAN n W. w.°oLIoxmAw & ASSOCIATES INTERIM PUB WKS DIR/JAN 001-400-3104-4201 00111 TRAFFIC SAFETY 001-400-4202-4201 00355 01/31/92 PUB WKS ADMIN 04288 001-400-4204-4201 00510 01/31/92 BLDG MAINT 04238 001-400-4205-4201 00010 01/31/92 smuIp SERVICE n W. m.*mLzowmAw & ASSOCIATES 04288 INTERIM PUB WKS DIR/JAN 01/31/92 160-400-3102-4201 00037 SEWER/ST DRAIN ^ INV/REF AMOUNT *1.oro.ou /CONTRACT asnvIus/peIvAT $2,359.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $786.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $786.50 /CONTRACT asevzcs/pnIw^r *1.57o.nn /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT °°° VENDOR TOTAL °***°°***********°***********************°**°**°******************** n HALPRIN SUPPLY COMPANY BOLT CUTTERS/ENGINE E-11 76674 $7,865.00 00946 001-400-2201-4309 01242 *102.19 01/20/92 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS °*° VENDOR TOTAL °°*°**°°**°°**°*°*******o**v**w**°°********°***°***°***°*°*°*°*°**** $102.19 n LARRY uoARuARA*HEIuER 04511 001-210-0000-2110 04704 $2.500.00 CASH DEPOSIT REFUND 9319 01/30/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE '- ---- °** VENDOR TOTAL °°**°***°°°**************°**°****°****°°****************°**°***°**** *2.500.00 n CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH WORK COMP CLAIMS/JAN 92 � PAGE 0009 DATE 02/13/92 PO # CHK #` UNENC DATE EXP,H 00071 39922 |^ *o.00 02/13/92: j -----'-'-T� 00071 39922 "~ 14'1 00071 00071. *o.00 00071 $0.00 39922 --'-.. !• .` 39922 L/ / 02/13/92'.j '.| 39922 �� oz/1o/9o.. [l� |-| 76674 03429 39923 H $99. 59 02/13/92'-' _-_ --_ / |1-" ' . 9319 03666 39924 L-; $0.00 02/13/92|."' ---- - ' — -' ' L. . .. tzt. 04075 705-400-1217-4162 00212 $21,639.18 03088 39925 01/31/92 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR *o.uo 02//3/ °°° VENDOR TOTAL °°°°*°**°**°°***°°**°**********°****°°**°*w°°**°**°°o***°°****°***** *21.639.18 e HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 e HERMOSA CAR WASH n HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 , 00065 00/-400-2101-4311 01347 *92.00 0606 00136 39926 �" 0606 01/31/92 ___ POLICE ____ /AUTO MAINTENANCE *m.00 02/13/92|'' 00065 001-400-2401-4311 00261 *v.uo i 0606 00136 upmza !..21 0606 01/31/92 ANIMAL CONTROL /AUTO mAIwrsmmvcs________ *o.om 02/13/92 '/ - � 00065 001-400-4201-4311 00274 $12.00 0606 00136 39926 � | o*o6. 01/31/92 BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 u2/1o/92 � -' • . 1#. FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 14:33:05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 R HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/13/92 VMD # — - - ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT -- DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00065 001-400-4202-4311 00205 0606 01/31/92 PUB WKS ADMIN 00065 110-400-3302-4311 00763 0606 01/31/92 PARKING ENF R HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 0606 $4.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $4.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00065 170-400-2103-4311 00030 $8.00 01/31/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL *********-a*- •n************************ t**•n*****it****ars *******• •n****** *** PAGE 0010 DATE 02/13/92 INV/REF PO # CHK #, AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $129.00 0606 00136 30. 00 0606 00136 $0.00 0606 00136 $0.00 R HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOC. 03131 001-400-1202-4201 00308 $1,052.10 SALES TAX SERV/OCT—DEC91 1011 02/01/92 FINANCE ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************* $1,052.10, R LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. 04303 001-400-6101-4201 00261 $7,685.50 I..' PARKS MAINT/JAN 92 6689 01/27/92 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ***,VENDOR TOTAL***********************************•n-n*********** ********** ******** 37,685.50 4.1 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 00167 001-400-2401-4305 00213 01/31/92 ANIMAL CONTROL 00167 001-400-3103-4309 01303 01/31/92 ST MAINTENANCE 00167 001-400-3104-4309 00801 01/31/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00167 001-400-4204-4309 02243 01/31/92 BLDG MAINT 00167 001-400-6101-4309 01180 01/31/92 PARKS $10.83 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $29.97 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $94.05 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $375.32 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $176.02 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $686.19 R LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON LEGAL SERVICES/DEC 91 02175 001-400-1203-4201 00879 $2,019.25 01/24/92 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 1011 00054 $0.00 39926 H.., 02/13/92H 39926ia 02/13/92,1 39926 1,!,..• 02/13/92' 39927 02/13/921 6689 00073 39928 $0.00 02/13/921 00138 39929 $0.00 02/13/92 001386 39929 I'0 $0.00 02/13/92, 00138 39929 I••'dp $0.00 02/13/92` ;.1 00138 39929 ' !� $0.00 02/13/92 00138 $0.00 02/13/92 39929 03085 39930 ", $0.00 02/13/92 0 rIwxwcs-sF«340 TIME 14:33:05 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/13/92 VND # -'' ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE INVC PROJ #ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION TRN � AMOUNT °°* VENDOR TOTAL °°****°************°********°°*°*it°*°**w****°*°****=****°i**°******** PACE 0011 DATE 0e/13/92 INV/REF PO # CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE sxp,. LOMITA BLUEPRINT eEmvIos, INC. 00077 001 -202-0000-2021 00145 DISCOUNT OFFERED 01/31/92 LOMITA BLUEPRINT asnvIos, INC. 00077 001 00145 DISCOUNT TAKEN 01/31/92 LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC.MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 00077 001-400-4101-+305 00600 01/31,92 PLANNING LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 *u.90 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $u.92on /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $49.86 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00077 001 00670 01/31/92 PUB WKS ADMIN 00077 305-400-8144-4201 00008 01,31/92 CIP 90-144 00077 305-400-8176-4201 00001 01/31/92 CIP 86-176 *72.r1 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $390.61 $71.24 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ****VENDOR TOTAL ***************************************°**************************** *5e4.42 ^ n LOS ANGELES co MARSHALLS' ~|! SMALL CLAIMS COURT FEES * * OFF. "1 00140 35931 !] $0.00 ou/�o/v� � 00140 39931 i^! *o.00 02r13/92 ~ ' - •". 00140 39931 /'"/ $0.00 02/13/92j" 00140 ; $0.00 02r13/92r^ � 00140 39931 ` $0.00 02/13/92 ~ � 00140 39931 /�| 03849 001-400-2101-4305 01697 *40.00 04301 p LOS ANGELES co MARSHALLS' OFF. 03849 SMALL CLAIMS COURT FEES 02/06/92 VENDOR TOTAL 001-400-4202-4305 00671 PUB WKS ADMIN *4u.00 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES °°**°°°*°°**°*°°°***°°************°°*°******°**°**°°**°°°°*****°**** *an.om ! / . ~- R LOUIS THE n^zLon, INC. 00079 110-400-3302-4187 00327 *117.83 :,,._ MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 8761e01/31/92_____PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE v *** VENDOR TOTAL *°°°*°°**°°°°°*****°*°°°********°°*°**°°*****°*°*°°°°°**°°*°**°***** *117.83 .,� '_---_- . 39932 02/13/92 04301^ 39932 ' $0.00 02//3/92 ------''------ - ''�! 887612 00142 39933 '| *o om mu/�o��� _-__- | ••• = R MAC WAREHOUSE 03810 001-400-2101-4305 01694 $51.00 A2274330 00243 39934 • ____________.nIocoHAnusS/pso po_____ 74330 02/06/92 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.02|•-~ ^• *°° vFwoon TOTAL ** °*°°°*°°°°°*°°°°°°°**°°°**°°***°*°° *51.00 ' • ` /.-� ��--__'_ - __-- --_�_-_�'_' __-'-_'- _-___-'__- �_--_- ' '_- _- ' '-____-____- `' R MAYOR'S OFF FOR THE DISABLED 02068 001-400-4201-4316 00284 $95.00 0*205 39935 '.| SEMINAR REG/W. GROVE 0e/13/92 BUILDING /TRAINING $0.00 oz/�o/�'` ~' .', . gb, J FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:33:05 PAY VENDOR NAME . DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/13/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4E --. AMOUNT - DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** PAGE 0012 DATE 02/13/92 J - INV/REF PO # CHK #,';,� AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $95.00 R JACQUELINE*MC MAHON 04513 110-300-0000-3302 44059 $28.00 909531 CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 09531 02/06/92 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R R R R R PAGENET PAGING SERV/FEB 92 02487 001-400-1203-4201 .00878 14234 02/01/92 PERSONNEL PAGENET PAGING SERV/FEB 92 14234 PAGENET PAGING SERV/FEB 92 PAGENET 02487 001-400-2101-4307 00311 02/01/92 POLICE 02487 001-400-2401-4201 00331 14234 02/01/92 ANIMAL CONTROL 02487 PAGING SERV/FEB 92 14234 02/01/92 PAGENET 02487 PAGING SERV/FEB 92 14234 02/01/92 001-400-4202-4201 00353 PUB WKS ADMIN 001-400-4601-4201 01201 COMM RESOURCES $28.00 $11.00 20214234 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $177.00 20214234 /RADIO MAINTENANCE 02793 $0.00 39936 02/13/92' 00049 39937 I, $0.00 02/13/92' 00049 39937 h- $0.00 02/13/92' $11.00 20214234 00049 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $115.41 20214234 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $22.00 20214234 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************* -*************-********************************ern $336.41 $0.00 39937 02/13/92 00049 39937 $0.00 02/13/92 00049 39937 $0.00 02/13/92 PALMA AUTO -BOOT 01171 110-400-3302-5401 00067 $1,088.00 91313 03332' 39938 DENVER BOOT IMMOBILIZERS 91313 12/03/91 PARKING ENF /EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 $1,134.82 02/13/72; *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************,*a*n************************* $1,088.00 R PEOPLE TO PEOPLE HIGH SCHOOL 04463 001-210-0000-2110 04703 $500.00 30606 03837 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 30606 02/06/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL **********•******************************** ****************** ****** $500.00 R PEP BOYS MISC. CHARGES/FEB 92 R PEP BOYS MISC. CHARGES/FEB 92 • • 00608 001-400-2101-4311 02/10/92 POLICE 00608 001-400-2201-4311 02/10/92 FIRE 01350 $50.46 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00423 $30.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 39939 02/13/92 • 00256 39940 30.00 02/13/92 00256 39940 $0.00 02/13/92 10 F IN,'1NCE—SFA34O TIME 14:33:05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/13/92 PAGE 0013 DATE 02/13/92 VND #-----ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN%#.. '.-.----.. AMOUNT ` INV/REF PO # CHK #.; DATE INVC PROJ # ,=ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP n1. R PEP BOPS 02/10/92 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00256$0.00 02/130/9' 00608 001-400-3103-4309 01304 $60.60 MISC. CHARGES/FEB 922, i' - 0% R PERSONAL SUPPORT COMPUTERS 03529 170-400-2103-5402 00051 $703.63 WLA031962 03190 39941 0 MAC COMPUTER PRINTER 31962 02/13/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS/EQUIP—MORE THAN $500 $0.00 02/13/92', *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************#**-****************t*****tr-******* $141.06 *** VENDOR TOTAL*************tr****************************************************** $703.63 R POSTAGE ON CALL 04091 001-400-1208-4305 01028 $2,008.50 POSTAGE METER RESET CHGS 97214 02/11/92 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL ************** . **********r *************** ************** ********n* $2,008.50 R POSTAL INSTANT PRESS 51697214 08062 39942 $0.00 02/13/92j 00296 109-400-3301-4201 00098 . 3011.88 120651 PLASTIC COATED VPD SIGNS 20651 01/08/92 VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL *********#********************************************************* $811.88 03334 39943 1 $814.08 02/13/92 R POSTMASTER 00398 110-400-3302-4305 00882 $2,000.00 03356 39944 CITATION -NOTICE POSTAGE 02/04/92 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 02/13/92 :' *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,000.00 R REGENTS OF UNIV OF CALIFORNIA 02456 001-400-2101-4316 00845 $260.00 + 02700 39945 L. TUITION/CMDR ALTFELD 02/11/92 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 02/13/921' *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************.tt************************************************ $260.00 6•, R SYLVIA*ROOT 04061 001-400-4102-4201 00345 $219.75 204 01963 39946 SEC SERV/2-4-92 204 02/10/92 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/13/92 • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $219.75 R SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 00151 001-400-2101-4251 00425 $114.66 40736 00035 39947 LI PRISONER BOOKING/AUG 91 40736 _ 02/07/92 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 02/13/92•. w 0 FINANCE–SFA340 TIME_ 14:33:05 PAY VENDOR NAME-- DESCRIPTION AMEDESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/13/92 PAGE 0014 DATE 02/13/92 - VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # - - AMOUNT - -INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • I *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************u****;r * ***a* *****;r**tr ***ire**** ***** R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00400 CITATION COURT BAIL 02/06/92 $114. 66 110-300-0000-3302 44058 $412.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL**************n*****************************************;r*********** R SOUTH BAY NOTICING AND MISC. CHARGES/JAN–FEB 92 ERO1E R SOUTH BAY NOTICING AND MISC. CHARGES/JAN–FEB 92 ERO2A $412. 00 03882 001-400-1121-4323 00178 2115.00 02/10/92 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING 03882 001-400-4101-4201 00135 02/10/92 PLANNING I, 03358 39948 0 $0.00 02/13/92',1 92HERO1E 00264 $0.00 2920.00 92HERO2A 00264 $0.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************4**************************************** SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 ELEC BILLINGS/JAN 92 01/31/92 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 01/31/92 ELEC BILLINGS/JAN 92 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLINGS/JAN 92 00159 01/31/92 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 ELEC BILLINGS/JAN 92 01/31/92 001-400-3101-4303 00185 MEDIANS 001-400-3104-4303 00098 TRAFFIC SAFETY 001-400-4204-4303 00521 BLDG MAINT 001-400-6101-4303 00400 PARKS $1,035.00 $69.02 /UTILITIES $623.45 /UTILITIES $7,330.01 /UTILITIES $1,656.37 /UTILITIES SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00333 $519.71 ELEC BILLINGS/JAN 92 01/31/92 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00184 269.38 ELEC BILLINGS/JAN 92 01/31/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $10,267.94 39949 I� 02/13/92,, 39949 02/13/92 00166 39950 $0.00 02/13/92j • I 00166 $0.00 00166 10.00 00166. $0.00 00166 $0.00 00166 $0.00 R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP 00146 001-400-4601-4305 01034 224.64 1077427-61 00033 WATER COOLER RENT/JAN 92 27-61 01/31/92 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************-x***s*********************x***-a***********x********* $24.64 R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 SWEEPING SERV/JAN 92 2760 01/31/92 001-400-3103-4201 00383 $2,647.00 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 2780 00027 $0.00 39950 02/13/92 39950 02/13/92; 39950 . 02/13/92 39950 H.. 02/13/92,! 39950 02/13/92'1 39951 02/13/92, 39952 02/13/92' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST 4 TIME 14:32:05 PAGE 0015 FOR 02/13/92 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION DATE 02/13/92 VND'# --ACCOUNT NUMBER— TRN #------ --AMOUNT------INV/REF- PO # - CHK *\ DATE INVC , PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ,I , 1 J .-- R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 109-400-3301-4201 00097 $3,055.00 2780 00027 39952 J. SWEEPING SERV/JAN 92 2780 01/31/92 VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/13/92p' VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $5,702.00 *** R ELAINE*WEINER 03368 001-400-4601-4201 01203 $756.00 WINTER FROG INSTRUCTOR 02/05/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $756.00 *** PAY CODE TOTAL ****************************************************************** *** TOTAL WARRANTS ****************************************************************** $95,671.80 $490, 592. 90 03741 $0. 00 • 39953 02/13/92 Ha' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGES TO ./._57INCLUSIVE, OF THE WARRANT REGISTER FOR.31.32•Z ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS APE AVAILADLE FOR PAYMCN T. AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO TH UDGET. BY FINANCE DI EC(( DATE • .• 1 t 1 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:36:58 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/2-1'TO 2-15-92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/20/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00243 001-202-0000-2030 00468 3292,015.56 02/18/92 —/ACCRUED -PAYROLL PAGE 0001 DATE 02/20/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP - *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************* $292,015.56 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RESERVE- AB702/JAN-92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. r RETIREMENT/JANUARY-92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JANUARY 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JANUARY 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JANUARY-92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 'RETIREMENT/JANUARY 92 311 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. —RETIREMENT/JANUARY-92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JANUARY-92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JANUARY-92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JANUARY 92 !! 42 43 41 45 4/3 5'3 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JANUARY 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. —RETIREMENT/JANUARY 92- H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JANUARY 92 00026 001-203-0000-2512 00003 367,089.68CR 02/18/92 ' /P:E.R:S: ADJ AB 702- ' 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00569 397,212.43 02/18/92 RETIREMENT —"RETIREMENT 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00570 338,062.26CR 02/18/92 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT 00026 105-400-2601-4180 00170 $1, 132. 58 !..) 39954 $0.00- 02/20/92 „100 39955 $0. 00 02/20/92 39955 $0.00-02/20/92 39955 , $0.00'— 02/20/92 , 39955 02/20/92 39955 J $0:00-02/20/92-!-i 02/18/92 STREET LIGHTING /RETIREMENT $0. 00 00026 109-400-3301-4180 00040 $172.08 02/18/92 VEH PKG-DIST —/RETIREMENT 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00173 • $5,498.65 02/18/92 PARKING 00026 145-400-3401-4180 02/18/92 DIAL -A 29955 ENF /RETIREMENT $0:00-- 02/20/92.:, 00146 $214. 79 39955 RIDE 'RETIREMENT $0100---02/20/92-i ' 0 39955 $0: 00 — 02/20J9 39955 30.00 02/20/92- 00026 145-400-3402-4180 00146 $28.98 02/18/92 ----------ESEA /RETIREMENT 00026 145-400-3403-4180 00095 $19.21 02/18/92-- BUS'PASS—SUBSDY-1RETIREMENT 00026 145-400-3408-4180 00015 $11.80 02/18/92-- COMMUTER XPRESS "RETIREMENT - 00026 155-400-2102-4180 00145 $128.91 02/18/92— CROSSING GUARD —/RETIREMENT 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00171 $802.98 02/18/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN -—/RETIREMENT 00026 170-400-2103-4180 00045 $4,685.35 02/18/92 SPEC—INVESTGTNS /RETIREMENT 39955 $0:00---02/20/92' 39955 , J 30. 00 02/20/92 39955 $0:00 02/20/92 .) 39955 h j 30. 00-02/20192 J 4a) � CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH � PAGE 0002 ' / DEMAND LIST oArs 02/20/92 FINANCE-e��o�« FOR 02/20/92 -- -� - --'•-' 'r' TIME �o�o���o ------'�-------' -- --INV/REF PO # CHK � ' /DESCRIPTION P � -------------'--- vwo w wzoouwT Numose rnm # ^�*�� AnouwT�mouwT unswc o�rs sxp i� �v v�woon w�ms PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ' - — -------- 39955 * ---p�s����n�zR��es. 00026 705-400-1209-4180 �� $298.83 . RETIREMENT/JANUARY -po----- - n2/1o/4z-LIABILITY-INS /��z --------$0:00---02/20/72-1' ��o� or 39955 } . 00026 705-400-1217-4180 00095 !, H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT RETIREMENT/JANUARY 92 -02/18/42* . ' ******°**** *o.����na v�wooe �or�� ****°°*�**°*****°******°*****°**°°*******°**°************ i��| ../*** ,,[4 °*°*****°***°*******°*********°*******°****°°*********°**°**° *297.478.08 _'�`, � *°° p�v CODE TOTAL °*°°* _-___- -'--'---- --�----- [% --- --'-------------'- -- -- 39959 ] R A_1 COAST RENTALS 00029 001-400-6101-4309 01187 *243.30 137397 00011 --n�su �xosro�w���_37ovr_o�/�o/po-PARKS -^-'/m^Iwrsw�wus MATERIALS $0.00 02/20/92 tr1 . H /. /. *��o oo -_' ''''**** _: °°° �__--_ � ,�`""~ TOTAL -----------------------�( -- --oz-�oo-u�o�-��oo 000e9 $4'712.93 4a681 04104 . 00935 o'*�oo_____*�.r1o�9o__ 02/20/92'0 PORTABLE RADIOS/POLICE 48681 02/13/92 n ADVANCED ELECTRONICS po�zos---'-'-----/EmuIp-nonE/n°m , ' **°vENDoR ToTAL******************************************************************** ~*'712.93 ___ Zi 07 `----'------- -- o��a� j!, wsz nv 6823 00025 , R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00857 001-400-2101-4306 01128 -POLICE Id t I R APOLLO LEASING COMPANY LTD 02558 001-400-3104-6900 00090 $855.11 88-1969 00066 39962 t, '--------' -----'---------' 41 001-400-4204-4309 02250 -~''.-- ���ro� 03644 39963 zALo---------*574:97-'-02/20r p2'"/^ JANITORIAL -SUPPLIES,. 44706 01/27/92 *BLDG MAINT• - -MAINTENANCE ' ''' ' ----'—'---- ----- o H '11 |'] R BEACH TRAVEL 00252 001-400-2101-4316 00849 $98.00 rn404 00404 39964 C �'____-_'----AznFAns/T�-r*ompsow rn404 mz/15/92-21uoo4-pm-z«E-rn«zw� ~ _oo/ou/p2[�.� � |�\ � CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH pzw^wcs-oFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0000, TIME 15:36:58 FOR 02/20/92 DATE 02/20/92 J .`- -- '-Tr, PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # ' DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT owEmo DATE EXP ! .^ �.� .,� /'. t. / . ^/, .. °°* vswoon TOTAL ******** **°****°*v,*****°***°***°*******°*****°*****°*°** '' R aooAw*oIGsLow ASSOCIATES 04443 001-400-1121-4201 00053 $3,417.00 3 00073 39965 ` °°* vswoon TOTAL °*°°*°°°°°°********°°°*°°°*°°°°°°°°**°*°°***°°°°°°*°***°**°°°°*°*°°* *3.417.00 " " ^. R BLACKTOP MATERIALS CO. 04352 001-400-3103-4309 01311 $60.62 189960001939966� � �-- --- -- mIoc u*Anoso/uAw-92 ---18996 01r31/72 Sr MAINTENANCE- -MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0:00-'-02/20/92 .r '2 |" L. .,' °°* VENDOR TOTAL ��m�ao ~ � �r----------- ^, ^� n arArs*ooAno OF EQUALIZATION 02411 001-400-1207-4251 00036 *38.48 8s16524 00079 39767SALES TAX ROLLS/OCT-DEC 16524 -02/05/92- BUS LICENSE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 02/20/92 |^' k .' . *** VENDOR TOTAL ***********°*****°**********°*****°**«*°*°°°*°*****°**************** $38.48 }^ ^ " / R THOMAS*BOHLIN 00894 001-400-2101-4312 01859 *66.30 04502 39968 |, ----nczno'nzLss/poor-CcASa no/1o/92---'----'---'pm_zos---'----/rnAvszEXPENSE-, poor $0.00 02/20/92- . - , ~� ,. � ° = , *°° vEwoon TOTAL *°********°°***°°°*°****************°**°°°***°*°******o**********w** n BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY 00034 001-400-1208-4305 01033 *443.83 182459 02777 39969 -----swvsLopsorororp� S2459 01729/92 '-------GEN APPROP /oFFzcs-opsn-SUPPLIES -------'--m44n.00 02r20/92'c °°° VENDOR TOTAL °°***°*°°**°*°*°*°*°********°******°*°*°*°*°*°*°**°°°°*°°°****°°**°* 401 •L.• � � e C.C.U.G. -ANNUAL DUES/V. EccsoG_ 01573 001-400-2101-4315 00210 $35.00 04122 39970 i,| 02/12/92 POLICE /MEMBERSHIP $0.00-02/20/92 - *°° VENDOR TOTAL °*°°°°°°**°**°*°°*°*°°*°*°*°*°*°°°****°°°°**°°*°*°°*°°°°**°°***°°°°* *oo.mm = ^ .'� , n C. D. C.D.O.A. .' ~ ' 03856 001-400-2101-4316 00851 *125.00 rn404 00404 39971 cONF nEG--TR404— 02/15/92 210004 -POLICE /TRAINING $0:00-02/20/92'- **° VENDOR TOTAL **** p ° `' JEANNE*CARUSO REIMB MILES/POST CLASS 03293 001-400-2101-4312 01860 *17.68 02/12792 POLICE ------ /TRAVEL EXPENSE ,-poar--- ------------------ 04503 39972 - .` $0.00 D2/20/92 , ..P � . «1P co 0' rzwAwcs-oFA340 TIME 15:36:58 CITY OF nsnnoaA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0004 FOR 02/20/92 DATE 02/20/92 � PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # !? DESCRIPTION:oArE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT uwEno oArs'sxp ` .J R JEANNE*CARUSO 03293 001-400-2101-4313 00395 $126.00 04501 39972 ` '� ------msALo/-c��aa 02/12/92—pm_zos----� --/rnAvsL-sxpEwssr-src $0.00 02/20/92-- ,' r` °*° VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** *143.68 |' • DATA SAFE 00156 001-400-1206-4201 00947 *166.17 60677 00015 39973 TAPE.STOR/2-12 TO 3-11 60677 02/17/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT- $0.00 02/20/92 °°° VENDOR TOTAL °°°°°°*°°°*°***°°°*°****°°***°*°*°*°°**°°°****°°*°*°°°°**°*°*°°°*°*° *166.17 / .. n DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPLY 04394 001-400-2101-4306 01129 *134.06 62296 00122 39974 MISC. CHARGES/JAN-9262296 01/31/92- -- ��� POLICE - /PRISONER MAINTENANCE- - - *o.ou 02r20/92 . °*° VENDOR TOTAL *°°****°°**°***°°****°**********°°***°***°****°*****°°*°*******°*°** *134.06 � ) n EASTMAN. INC. 02514 001-400-1208-4305 01032 $25807 00124 39975 [` OFFICE-aupproToc"YoAw 92 01/31/92 GEN Appnop'----- oFrzos-ops 'SUPPLIES *n.no02/20/92' `' ) R EASY READER 001e1 109-400-3301-4201 00101 *550.00 0206055 03360 39976 , vpo puLLpAos AD 06055 02/06/92—VEH p�� ozar—oowrn�r'a�nv�n�/pn�v�rm�.� .° / *** VENDOR TOTAL *************************************°*****°***************°******** *550.00 R ENVIRONMENTAL ENG & TECHNOLOGY 04514 001-400-4204-4309 02251 *nm.00 Im21413 ot672 39977 |' ./ ----------TEST -FIRE-DEPT -pIps-'----21410- 02/10/92- BLDG MAINT ---/mAzwrswAwus-�m^rsnzALa—'------$0:00---02/20/92H ~ *°* VENDOR TOTAL *°**°°*°** /�/� ^°°°°*°****°**°**°*****°**°*°*°*°***°*°**°**°*°*******°**** *�o�oo /�| " n mAnGAnzro°oAeoIA 04519 110-300-0000-3302 CITATION PAYMENT: -REFUND n2/1v/92---------- 4 44084 *18.00 945467 02799 39978 �| /COURT-FINES/PARKING $0.00 .02/20/92-: °°* VENDOR TOTAL ***°***°°°***********°*°*****°*°*****°*********°*******°***°******** $18.00 � • GERBER AMBULANCE SERVICE 02897 001-400-2101-4201 00954 $305.00 20892 04124 39979 ^' ' PRISONER smseG-asnvznEa--2uo92-----0o/12/92--------------POLICE /oowrnAor-osnvIos/peIw*r $0.00 02/20/92- • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:36:58 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/20/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL?t*ettt*at##ar#at#at#at#*#+r**#***************#***#**##*#***#***#**#*****##** INV/REF $305. 00 PAGE 0005 DATE 02/20/92 PO # CHC # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 DIRECT DIAL-CHGS/FEB-92 02/01/92-. R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 --TELE-CHARGES/FEB 92 - --- -- -02/01/92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED -"-TELE-CHARGES/JAN 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/FEB-92 001-400-1101-4304 00428 $7.35 CITY COUNCIL ---- /TELEPHONE -- 001-400-1101-4304 00430 $2.29 CITY COUNCIL-"-. /TELEPHONE - --' 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00431 $6.71 01/31/92 - -.. CITY COUNCIL-- TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00479 $19.97 02/01%92 -' CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 TELE CHARGES/FEB 92' --"02/01/92 GTErCALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 —TELE CHARGES/JAN 92 01/31/94 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED -DIRECT""DIALCHGS/FEB 92 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED - -` TELE CHARGES/FEB-92 'R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/JAN-92 --.- - - e • •12 .13 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT -DIAL CHGS/FEB 92- R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED -TELE CHARGES/FEB- 92 --" R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE'CHARGES/JAN 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA; INCORPORATED 'DIRECT DIAL-CHGS/FED 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/FEB- 92 001-400-1121-4304 00481 $6.21 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE - 001 -400-1121-4304 00482 $19.27 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE"---" 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00346 $10.51 02/01792 - "` CITY-ATTORNEY-7TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00348 $3.27 02/01'/92" 'CITY -ATTORNEY ---/TELEPHONE ------ 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00349 $B.64 01731/92 CITY ATTORNEY--7TELEPHONE 00015 02/01792 00015 02/01/92 00015 01/31792 001-400-1141-4304 00497 $19.97 CITY -TREASURER ---/TELEPHONE 001-400-1141-4304 00499 $6.21 CITY TREASURER -/TELEPHONE 001-400-1141-4304 00500 $17.50 -CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00533 $16.82 02/01792 -- CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 00015 02/01/92 001-400-1201-4304 00535 $5.30 CITY"MANAGER - /TELEPHONE-' • 00231 39984 j'; $0:00 02/20/92 .. 00230 39984 '' $0. 00 02/20/92 00130 39984 $0.00- 02/20/92 00231 39984 $0.00..- 02/20/92 00230 39984 $0.00 02/20/92 00130 39984 $0:00-- 02/20/92 00015 39984 $0:00.. 02/20/92 00230 39984 -$0.00-- 02/20/92 00130 39984 - $0.00-- . 02/20/92 b0231 39984 I;:;, $0:00- "'02/20/92 00230 39984 $0:00" -02/20/92 00130 39984 $0.00 02/20/92 00231 39984 $0:00-02/20/92 02/20/92 00230 39984 -$0.00 - 02/20/92 FINANCE-SFA340 TIM! 15:36:58. PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED -TELE CHARGES/JAN 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/FEB 92 - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/20/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PACE 0006 D/ITE 02/20/92 INV/REF PO # CHR # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00019 001-400-1201-4304 00936 $14.49 01/31/92 CITY"MANAGER-/TELEPHONE -- - 00015 001-400-1202-4304'' 00547 $60.96 02/01/92 FINANCE ADMIN' /TELEPHONE --- R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 --TELE CHARGES/FEB 92 - -- 02/01/92 R GTE CALIFORNIA,, INCORPORATED TELE-CHARGES/JAN 92 001-400-1202-4304 00549 $18.97 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE - 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00550 $55.21 01/31192 "" FINANCE'ADMIN - /TELEPHONE R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 DIRECT' DIAL CHGS/FEB-92...--._ ---- 02/01/92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED - TELE CHARGES/FEB 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/JW 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT- DIAL- CHGS/FEB--92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE-CHARGES/FEB 92 R F GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/JAN 92 R r GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT -DIAL 'CHGS/FEB_-92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE _CHARGES/FEB -'92 001-400-1203-4304 00551 $25.22 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE -.- 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00553 $7.85 02/01/92 - - PERSONNEL ... -/TELEPHONE - 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00554 $35.47 01/31/92 - 'PERSONNEL - -/TELEPHONE 00130 399334 $0.00 02/20/92 00231 39984 $0.00 02/20/92 00230 39984 $0.00 02/20/92 00130 39984' $0.00 __ 02/20/92-: 00231 39984 $0.00 - 02/20/92 00230 39984 - $0.00" 02/20/92 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00450 $30.48 02/01/92' - - "` DATA -PROCESSING -/TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00452 $111.27 02/01/92 - DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00453 $104.79 01/31/92'DATA PROCESSING'/TELEPHONE 00015 02/01/92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/ i N'92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL-CHGS/FEB 92------- R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/FEB-92 001-400-1207-4304 00362 $19.97 BUS LICENSE ---/TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00364 $6.21 02/01/92 BUS LICENSE -' -/TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00365 $17.73 01/31/92 - - - - BUS LICENSE -,TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1208-4304 00189 $10.51 02/01/92 GEN APPROP -'"- /TELEPHONE 00130 39984 $0.00 -_'02/20/92- 00231 39984 $0:00-02/20/92- - 0:00-'-02/20/92 00230 39934 $0.00---02/20/92- 00130 0.00----'02/20/92-. 00130 39984 $0.00 02/20/921 00231 39984 $0:00 02/20/92 • • 00230 39984 - $0.00 _- 02/20/92 00130 39984 00015 001-400-1208-4304 00191 $3.27 02/01/92 GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE $0.00 --02/20/92 00231 39984 $0.00- 02/20/92 00230 39984 $0:.00 02/20/92 I FINANCE-SFA340 TIFIE 15:36:58 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPOR.ATED -TELE CHARGES/JAN 92 GTE, CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL-CHCS/FEB 92 ------ R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/FEB-92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 'TELE-CHARGES/JAN-92 111 21. L. w.4 UJ 41 .12 43 44 45 11 4, .33 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHCS/FEB 92 --' R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED -TELE-CHARGES/FEB-92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED -TELE CHARGES/JAN 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/FEB 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED -TELE CHARGES/FEB-92- GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE--CHARGES/JAN-92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT -DIAL CHGS/FEB 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/FEB 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES7JQN 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA; INCORPORATED DIRECT-DIAL-CHGS/FEB-' 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/FEB 92 VND # DATE INVC 00015 01/31192 00015 02/01/92 00015 02/01/92- 00015 01/31/92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/20/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # PROJ # ACCOUNT 6 AMOUNT INV/REF PO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC 001-400-1208-4304 00192 $8.92 GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE 001-400-2101-4304 00970 $394.11 POLICE - /TELEPHONE 001-400-2101-4304 00972 $354.90 POLICE - -/TELEPHONE 001-400-2101-4304 00973 $650.15 POLICE ____.._._____._.-/TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00409 -02/01/92- 00015 02/01%92 00015 01/31/92 $10.51 FIRE" "' /TELEPHONE -- 001-400-2201-4304 00411 $3.27 FIRE /TELEPHONE - 001 -400-2201-4304 00412 $163.66 FIRE /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00428 $14.71 02/01792- -" - '"- ANIMAL CONTROL -/TELEPHONE-- i 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00430 $23.63 02/01/92 ANIMAL-CONTROL-1TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00431 $13.90 01/31792 ANIMAL CONTROL /TEL"EPHONE---- 00015 02/01792 00615 02/01/92 001-400-4101-4304 00551 $56.50 PLANNING /TELEPHONE 001-400-4101-4304 00553 $15.70 -PLANNING-- -/TELEPHONE---- 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00554 $59.06 01/31792 - - ` PLANNING - --/TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00496 $80.92 02/01792 - - - - BUILDING -/TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00498 $25.19 02/01792 BUILDING' -- /TELEPHONE PAGE 0007. DATE 02/20/92 it CHK # DATE EXP t� 00130 39984 $0.00-- -02/20/92A 00231 39984 tki $0.00 02/20/92 00230 39984 $0.00 02/20/92 00130 39984 $0.00-- 02/20/92 00231 39984 $0.00 ---02/20/92 00230 39484 $0.00-7-02/20/92 00130 39984 ; $0.00 - 02/20/92- J2 00231 39984 " ..i $0:00-____02/20/92'' 00230 39984 $000--702/20/92 00130 39984 $0.00- 02/20/92 i. 00231 39984 $0.00 02/20/92-- i i 00230 39984 ') $0:00---02/20/92' 00130 39984 $0700--02/20/92 •.; 00231 39984 $0.00 -02/20192' vl 00230 39984 ' j $0.00- 02/20/92 G-1 4.1 FINANCE-SFA340 TrME 15:36:58 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/20/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN ft AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 TELE CHARGES/JAN 92 01/31/92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 DIRECT DIAL CHGS/FEB 92 02/01/92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE .CHARGES/FEB 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA,, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/JAN 92 601-400-4201-4364 66449 $94.02 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 001-400-4202-4304 00575 $111. 40 PUB WKS -ADMIN /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00577 $184.65 02/01/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE ' 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00578 $132.58 01/31/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE - GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 -TELE CHARGES/FED-92 02/01/92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/FEB 92 02/01192 001-400-4204-4321 00632 BLDG MAINT PAGE 0008 DATE 02/20/92 INV/REF PO it CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $25.37 'BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT---- 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00643 $31.82 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE- R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/FEB-92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE-CHARGES/JAN-92 14 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/FEB 92 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00645 4*9.48 02/01/92 COMM RESOURCES/TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00646 $92.80 -01/31/92 -COMM RESOURCES- /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00386 02/01/92 -PARKS R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 TELE CHARGES/FEB 92 02/01/92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/JAN 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE-CHARGES/JAN 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL-CHGS/FEB 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED — — — --- TELE -CHARGES/FEB-92 4 f R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/JAN 92 001-400-6101-4304 00388 PARKS 00130 39984 $0.00 02/20/92 00231 39984 M0.00 02/20/92 00230 39984 S0.00 02/20/92 00130 39984 $0.00 02/20/92 1, I :21 • .a 00230 39984 - $0.00 02/20/92", 00231 39984 $0.00 -02/20/92 00230 39984 ' $0:'00 02/20/92-1 00130 39984 • $0.00 - 02/20/92 , - 4*10.51 00231 39984 /TELEPHONE $0.00 02/20/92 • j 00231 39984 $0.00- 02/20/92 J" $109.31 00230 39984 /TELEPHONE $0.06---02/20/927 $3.27 00230 39984 "TELEPHONE- $0. 00 -- 02/20/92 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00389 4*8.64 01/31/92 PARKS /TELEPHONE 00015 109-400-3301-4304 00044 4*10.00 01/31/92 VEH PKG DIST -"TELEPHONE 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00553 $126.12 02/01/92 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00555 02/01792 PARKING ENF 60130 39984 $0.-00---02/20/92 00130 39984 $0.00 02/20/92 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00556 $153.13 01/31/92- PARKING ENE- /TELEPHONE 00130 39984 $0.00 - 02/20/92. I dip I 1, dP 8. FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:36:58 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/AN-92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/20/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PO UNENC PAGE 0009 DATE 02/20/92 CHK # 1;1 DATE EXP .1) 00015 145-400-3401-4304 00106 $4.16 00130 01/31192 DIAL A RIDE 7TELEPHONE $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL *****************************#************************************** $3,654.81 R GTEL Pr, PHONE SYSTEM- MA R GTEL PHONE SYSTEM MAINTIFEB92 1,2IR GTEL PHONE R GTEL PHONE 2.1 SYSTEM MAINT/FEB92 SYSTEM MAINT/FEB92 R GTEL. PHONE SYSTEM-MAINT1FEB92 R GTEL PHONE-SYSTEM-MAINT7FEB92 R GTEL PHONE SYSTEM-MAINT1FEB92 4,!'2R GTEL PHONE SYSTEM-MAINT/FEB92 IP R GTEL PHONE SYSTEM MAINT/FEB92 R GTEL PHONE SYSTEM MAINT/FEB92 R GTEL PHONE -SYSTEM MQINT/FEB92 R GTEL PHONE SYSTEM MAINT7FEB92 R GTEL PHONE -SYSTEM MAINT/FEB92 01340 02/01/92' 01340 02/01/92 01340 02/01192 001-400-1101-4304 00429 CITY COUNCIL 001-400-1121-4304 00480 CITY CLERK 001-400-1131-4304 00347 CITY ATTORNEY 39984 02/20/92- $3.44 00067 39986 - /TELEPHONE $0. 00 .....02/20/92 19 11 .• $9.35 00067 39986 /TELEPHONE- $0.00 --02/20/92 $4. 92 00067 39986 .'3 /TELEPHONE $0.00 02/20/92 01340 001-400-1141-4304 00498 $9.35 02/01/92 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1201-4304 00534 $7.87 02/01792 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1202-4304 00548 $28.54 02/01792 FINANCE -ADMIN /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1203-4304 00552 *11.81 02/01/92 PERSONNEL 00067 39986 $0. 00 - 02/20/92 00067 39986 $0.00---02/20/92- 00067 39986 00--- 02/20/92.:,- 39986 /TELEPHONE 00067 $0. 00 --- 02/20/92- 39486 ' 02/20/92 *9.35 00067 39986 /TELEPHONE $0. 00 -02/20/92 01340 001-400-1206-4304 00451 $14.27 00067 02/01/92 DATA PROCESSING'/TELEPHONE $0.00-- 01340 02/01192 001-400-1207-4304 00363 BUS LICENSE 01340 001-400-1208-4304 00190 02/01/92 GEN APPROP *4.92 00067 39986 /TELEPHONE $0.00----02/20/92 01340 001-400-2101-4304 00971 $184.50 02/01/92 POLICE - /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-2201-4304 00410 02/01/92 FIRE 00067 39986 $0:00- 02/20/92-, $4.92 00067 39986 7TELEPHONE $0:00---02/20/92 01340 001-400-2401-4304 00429 $6.S9 02/01792 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE 00067 39986 $0:'00 02/20/92 , SI; 14 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:36:58 a FAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R R R GTEL --PHONE-SYSTEM-MAINT/FEB92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/20/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 01340 001-400-4101-4304 00552 02/01/92 - - - PLANNING'- -- - GTEL 01340 PHONE SYSTEM-MAINT/FEB92 02/01/92 GTEL 01340 • PHONE -SYSTEM MAINT/FEB92 02/01/92 GTEL PHONE'SYSTEM-MAINT/FEB92 R GTEL PHONE`SYSTEM-MAINT/FEB92 $23. 61 /TELEPHONE'- - �;t 001-400-4201-4304 00497 $37.88 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 001-400-4202-4304 00576 $52.15 PUB WKS ADMIN ------/TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-4601-4304 00644 $14.27 02/01/92 — - COMM RESOURCES --/TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-6101-4304 00387 $4.92 02/01/92 PARKS - /TELEPHONE GTEL 01340 110-400-3302-4304 00554 $59.04 PHONE SYSTEM-MAINT/FEB92`- — — -02/01/92 PARKING ENF -/TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************** ***********4*********qtr************** R HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY COMPUTER --SYS MAINT/FEB92 T1R19 PAGE 0010, 6 DATE 02/20/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # Ti•l AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $492. 00 00067 39986 ' $0.00--`-02/20/92 io 00067 39986 " $0.00 02/20/92 00067 39986 $0. 00 -- 02/20/92 00067 39986 $000-- 02/20/92 00067 39986 $0.00 -02/20/92 00067 39986 $0.00- " 02/20/92 00149 001-400-1206-4201 00946 $1,202.00 09T1R19 00009 39987 02/03/92 DATA -.PROCESSING "/CONTRACT_'SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00"" 02/20/92 -** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************** ************* . *****4I******x* $17202.00 R a CONCORD#HILTON HOTEL ---ADV/ THOMPSON--------TR404 04515 001-400-2101-4316 02/15/92 -210004-POLICE 00848 $194.70 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $194. 70 TR404 00404 39958 $0. -00 02/20/9R J I I11,� 14 31 41 42 4.1 R TEREA*JOHNSON PER- DIEM -ADVANCE- TR400 R TEREA*JOHNSON HOTEL ADVANCE/T.-JOHNSON-TR400 00444 001-400-2101-4316 00853 $77.25 02/20/92 POLICE - /TRAINING 00444 001-400-2101-4316 02/20/92 — - POLICE 00855 $53.00 -/TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL*****+t*******#****a*************?t********#****?r**#****************** R JOHNSON'S BRAKE SUPPLY EMERG,BRAKE REPAIR 19008 00319 001-400-2101-4311 01/30/92 POLICE } $130. 25 TR400 00400 39989 - _ $0.00 _-_ 02/20/92- TR400 00400 39989 $0.-00 ---02/20/92 ., 01356 $63.63 -- /AUTO -MAINTENANCE 19008 04115 39990 $0700---02/20/92 - , • J IJ S FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:36:58 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/20/92 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0011, DATE 02/20/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************************-***** $63.63 R JOHN*KEARIN 01032 001-400-2101-4316 00852 $97.26 REIMB'BOOKS/SPRING 92 02/12/92" POLICE /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL ***•nor***************************•************************************ $97. 26 04125 39991 $0.00 02/20/92 LOS ANGELES CO CIV SERV COMM. 00869 001-400-1203-4201 00882 $1,826.94 92-001 03092 39992 CIVIL SERVICE APPEAL ---2-001— 02/11792 PERSONNEL'----.._ /CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.--00-'""'02/20/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MAC WAREHOUSE $1,826.94 03810 001-400-4101-4305 00603 $44.50 A2327047 00243 39493 MISC: CHARGES/FEB-92 27047- 02/12792 - PLANNING" "" — /OFFICE -OPER --SUPPLIES $0.00" -"02/20/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $44. 50 m n p. I3,✓ 3: R CITY OF *MANHATTAN BEACH 00183 001-400-3103-4251 00012 $471.38 9086 03668 39994 ARTESIA MED MAINT7TO-'DEC--9086 -- 01/27/92 " ST MAINTENANCE-7CONTRACT'SERVICE/GOVT'- -" " """ $0.00- 02/20/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL*********•n******************************************?r*************** 42, $471. 38 Rr MASTER K-9 03120 001-400-2101-4201 00955 $65.00 149 04123 39995 MAINT TRAINING/JAN92 -"-149 102/01/92 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT" $0.00 -"--02/20/9? *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $65.00 R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION 00388 170-400-2103-4310 00043 $10.44 93078482 00150 39996 C MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 - 78482 - 02/11792 - `" "'""SPEC INVESTGTNS"/MOTOR FUELS -AND LUBES"- $0:06- "02/20/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL*****•*************************************************************** l 44 4') $10. 44 R MONARCH BROOM - 00084 001-400-3103-4309 01312 $844.36 8568/69 00149 39997 MISC""CHARGESTJAN 92 68/69- 01731/92 - ST MAINTENANCE _-/MAINTENANCE-MATERIALS"--------_----- $0700-"-" 02/20/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************•********************************************* $844.36 R OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 00093 001-400-2101-4311 01355 $349.28 MISC: CHARGES/FEB 92 12676 — 02/11/92 _..____.....--POLICE - "- -/AUTO MAIP•ITENANCE 12676 00252 39996 $0.00- 02/20/92 e FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:36:58 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/20/92 PAGE 0012 DATE 02/20/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # ',„, AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL*tr***#****•#**•**#************-p***#******#*#*•n*********#****#*#**** $349. 28 R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPUTER HOOKUPS/FEB 92 00321 001-400-2101-4304 00974 $152.12 02/01/92 POLICE /TELEPHONE"..__-. *** VENDOR TOTAL **a*-?F*?#*n##*#*#**#-n•n**#***********•n*##*****#**#**#*•n**#*•n***#***#** $152. 12 00036 39999 $0. 00 ' 02/20/92 R DAN*PLUMMER 04517 001-210-0000-2110 04724 $50.00 15719 03839 /DEPOSITS/WORK--GUARANTEE - $0.00- ANIMAL 0.00- ANIMAL TRAP_ REFUND--- -15719 02/13/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL *ttxttit*it• ;t#**it-x*****#*****if******grit*#*******#it*******• **tr***********tr R PRIMA- PUBLICATIONS/RISK-MGMT $50. 00 40000 02/20/92 02366 705-400-1209-4316 00045 $25.00 03093 40001 02/13/92 — - LIABILITY INS /TRAINING- -- - '$0.00_- 02/20/92 *** VENDOR TOTALititititit**itit*#ititiaififit*itiairifitititirit#iHtiti►*****•***#********#********#*****##* $25. 00 R RED LION INN "- HOTEL-`ADVANCE/T. JOHNSON_TR400 03854 001-400-2101-4316 00854 $222.36 TR400 00400 40002 02/20/92 POLICE - -/TRAINING $0:00 02/20/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************************************•n****** $222. 36 R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES 01578 001-400-3104-4201 00113 $937.50 92065 03680 40003 -TRAFFIC-ENG SERV/JAN-92--92065 — 01/31/92 - - TRAFFIC SAFETY'--/CONTRACT--SERVICE_/PRIVAT $0:00 -02/20/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL • -x*#*if#t►*****#***##*###***tt*****#if#*##**#****-»#• **##***•n• **#*## •*## $937. 50 -50 R MICHELLE*SALAZAR 41 *** VENDOR TOTAL******#•x#**•»**********#**#*•n****it**#**•sr•x*#•n**********##*##*a*•**#*** $70.00 DAMAGE DEPOSIT--REFUND-------30622 04518 001-210-0000-2110 04723 $70.00 30622 03838 40004 02/13/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK-GUARANTEE $0:00 02/20/92 I J i 44 R DONALD*SENTZ • 04516 001-210--0000-2110 04725 $50.00 32593 04401 40005 - ANIMAL -TRAP -REFUND -_-------32593 02/13/92 - _ ....___ - .__._ __. ..-- -.------------------/DEPOSITS/WORK'GUARANTEE - $0.00- -02/20/92-- *** --02/20/92 .;*** VENDOR TOTAL***•u*#****tt********•u**•n*******-n****#***it*#******•n#-n*•n********tr****#•u $50. 00 R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 001-400-2101-4306 01127 $91.08 147236 00162 40006 'J MISCO CHARGES/JAN 92 --47236 - 01/31/92 POLICE — - /PRISONER MAINTENANCE_ — $0:00- 02/20/92 V FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:36:58 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/20/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL**?***************************************************************** INV/REF $91. 08 R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00123 $1,318.00 BUS' PASS SALES/JAN-92 59307 ------ 01/31/92 - " " BUS PASS"SUBSDY""/CONTRACT"SERVICE/GOVT-- *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************************-***** $1, 318. 00 PAGE 0013 DATE 02/20/92 + PO # CHK # I- AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP I:I iol 59307 03353 40007 $0.00 -02/20/92 R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER 00113 001-400-2201-4309 01246 $59.54 15791 00263 MISC:- CHARGES/FEB-9215791 p2l08/9� FIRE ---/MAINTENANCE-MATERIALS- $0.00- - *** p,pp-- *** VENDOR TOTAL *****************************-************************************** $59. 54 R SOUTH BAY HEATING AIR COND"EMERG SERVICE- 15634 40008 02/20/92 02535 001-400-4204-4309 02252 $90.00 15634 03665 40009 01/31/92 BLDG MAINT-----"-""-/MAINttNANCE MATERIALS- -""- --`"" $0:00--02/20/92 *** VENDOR TbTAL********************************************************************* $90.00 R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL 00107 001-400-2101-4201 00956 $402.00 BLOOD-ALCOHOL TESTING 02/13/92 POLICE /CONTRACT-SERVICEIPRIVAT - LiI *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 1'! • $402. 00 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 110-300-0000-3302 44085 $12,943.00 CITATION SURCHARGE/JAN92 01/31/92 ---"""---..-.. ...__._ .. _._.___ - -- --_--/COURT-FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** .0 512, 943. 00 04121 40010 $0.00 --02/20/92 1,5 02794 40011 $0.00------ 02/20/92 . R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00335 $12,258.68 STREET-LITE-CHCS/JAN" 92 01/31792 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES"-.-"- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R TOM*THOMPSON -PER _. DIEM ADVANCE "-`-----TR.404 R TOM*THOMPSON AIRPORT SHUTTLE/THOMPSON-TR404 $12,258.68 00012 40012 $0. 00 —02/20/92 " $0: "00 '' ' 02/20/92 TR404 00404 40013 30.00' 02/20/92 01009 001-400-2101-4316 00847 377.25 02/15/92- '"'-210004 POLICE " -- ""`-7TRAINING---' 01009 001-400-2101-4316 • 02/15/92 -210004 POLICE 00850 $28.00 /TRAINING TR404 00404 40013 ,4 15 • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:36:58 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0014' FOR 02/20/92 DATE 02/20/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK * DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP . _ *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R TRIANGLE HARDWARE DISCOUNT OFFERED R TRIANGLE HARDWARE DISCOUNT TAKEN R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/JAN--92-- R- TRIANGLE HARDWARE - - MISC:-CHARGES/JAN-92 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISCr-CHARGES/jAN 92 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE -MISC. -CHARGES/JAN-92 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. -CHARGES/JAN-792 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 'MISC:-CHARGES/JAN 92 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 00123 01/31/92 00123 01/31/92 00123 01/31/92 001-202-0000-2021 001-202-0000-2022 001-400-2101-4187 POLICE 00123 001-400-2101-4309 01/31/92 POLICE 00123 001-400-2201-4309 01/31/92 FIRE , $105.25 00149 $160.41 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 00149 $160.41CR /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 00175 40014 $0. 00 02/20/92 00175 40014 $0.00 -02/20/92 00471 $9.73 00175 40014 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE- $0:00 02/20/92- 00494 $37.01 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01245 $113.70 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 7 ' 11 00175 40014 2,3. $0. 00 02/20/92--.-. 00175 40014 [7, $b. 00 - 02/20/92 00123 001-400-3101-4309 00124 $61.61 00175 40014 01/31/92 MEDIANS MAINTENANCE MATERIALS- $0:00, 02/20/92- 00123, - 001-400-3103-4309 01310 $47.12 00175 40014 01/31/92 ST-MAINTENANCE—MA/NTENANCE MATERIALS -!, 00123 001-400-3104-4309 00807 $166.59 00175 40014 01/31192- -TRAFFIC-SAFETY' -MAINTENANCE-MATERIALS $0:00--02/20/92-:, • 00123 001-400-4204-4309 02249 $792.96 00175 40014 '' •:, 01/31/92 BLDG MAINT "MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 --02/20/92 00123 001-400-6101-4309 01186 $52.79 00175 40014 4: 01/31/92 PARKS -MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0:00--02/20/92-:i. 00123 105-400-2601-4309 00785 $101.95 00175 40014 01/31/92 STREET'LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS $0.00---02/20/92 00123 110-400-3302-4309 01/31/92- PARKING 00820 $60.27 00175 40014 ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -- $0.00- -02/20/92-w *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R WARD - THK SETTLEMENT/B7-MARTINEZ $1,443.73 03937 170-400-2103-4324 00001 $6,285.00 04601 40015 01/31/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS-/CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS $0:00-702/20/92 ao, 110 FzwAwcs-aFA340 TIME 15:36:58 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION • WARD - THK r'—'-------LzAa'CLAIMS/JAN 'po CITY OF xcenooA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0015. FOR 02/20/92 DATE 02/20/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #' _ 03937 705-400-1209-4201 00248 01/31/92 LIABILITYINS • WARD - r*x 03937 SETTLEMENT/BAYE 01/31/92 705-400-1209-4324 00249 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP �!�|^ '[ *3.42e.25 04601 40015 7 \ -/CONTRACraERvIos/PRIwAT-- -- $0.00--02/20/92 c *400.00 04601 40015 |YCLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS $0.00. -02/20/92� VENDOR TOTAL ° *10.113.25 n XEROX CORPORATION COPIER MAINT/USE/DEC-91--71551 • XEROX CORPORATION • .. ,� .. 00135 001-400-1208-4201 00847 $332.26 31671551 00007 40016 " 01/09/92 Gem Appnop------/CowrnAcrssnvzns/pnzvAr------ $0.00 02/20/92 00135 001-400-120e-4201 00e48 *432./9 31671552 00020 40016 ~ 01/09/92- GEN Appnop-----/nowrnAor-osnvzcs/peIw^r- --'--'- $0.00 02/20/92 °°° VENDOR TOTAL. *°°°***°°°***°**°°***°***°°°*°°°*°°°*°°°*°*°°°°°*°***°*********°*°*° n ' -- zowAn INDUSTRIES ST-SIGNS/PCH'ti AVIATION --10486 01206 00/-400-3104-4309 00808 $134.79 10486 03662 40017 02/03/92 TRAFFIC- oAFsrv--/m*ImrEmAmcs'MATER zALS *134:79-,--02/20/92|� *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** ° TOTAL WARRANTS *360.514.56 = 3 SI • f HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS Y new^ x*�ouxro,vw COVERED— � THE" w^nxwNT.nEGISrERnm +1»11,/f >.—_. ARE ACCURATE. — THEFUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN uuoo�� CONFORMANCE TO 141 145 \ ° BY IRECTO DATE FINANCE ° / February 20, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of February 26, 1992 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS March 10, 1992 CIP 89-151 - Award contract for Office of Traffic Safety grant Public Works Director Award contract for janitorial services Public Works Director Award downtown maintenance agreement Alternatives for parking solutions on PCH (GIP) Public Works Director Building Director Council 8/13/91 Report on procedure for protecting survey monuments 16th to 19th sts. Public Works Dir. Cable T.V. Board appointment Community Resources Dir. March 26, 1992 Joint workshop meeting of Council with School District Board/ Planning Commission/Parks & Rec. Commission March 24, 1992 Removal of hazardous materials from building at Clark Field Public Works Director Council 10/9/90 Map and time schedule for street sweeping Public Wks. Dir. Coordination of street sweeping with trash pickup days Recommendation regarding telephone system replacement Greenbelt parking and improvements (from joint mtg. w/P.C.) Report on Management audits (GIP) - 1 - Public Works Dir. General Services Dir. Public Works Director Finance Director City Mgr.3/25/91 Amendment of ordinance regulating real estate signs Building Director April 14, 1992 Rotation of Mayor CIP 85-137 - Valley accept as complete April 28, 1992 Proclamation declaring Awareness Month 3rd Quarter CIP status Ardmore overlay May Water report Quarterly update of Goals Implementation Program May 12, 1992 Proclamation Public Works Week May 18 to 22 Identify misc. revenue, develop appropriate fee (GIP) Project Touch lease renewal (Rms. 3 & 11) May 14, 1992 Joint Council workshop meeting with Chamber of Commerce and Planning Commission May 26, 1992 Street lighting/Crossing Guard (a) resolution approving report (b) resolution setting public hearing for June 23 June 9, 1992 Approval of Land Use Element (GIP) Dispute Resolution Services lease renewal June 11 or 18, 1992 Joint meeting of Council with Planning Commission - 2 - Public Works Director Public Works Director City Manager Public Works Director Finance Director Community Resources Dir. Public Works Director Planning Director Community Resources Dir. June 23, 1992 Report on civilian enforcement officers (GIP) Street lighting/Crossing Guard public hearing July 28, 1992 4th Quarter CIP status report Quarterly update of Goals Implementation Program August 11, 1992 Hope Chapel Lease renewal (Rms. 5, 6A) September 8, 1992 Association for Retarded Citizens lease renewal (Rm. 1, 2, 15) South Bay Hospital District lease renewal (Rm 9) Easter Seals lease renewal (Rms. 16, 17) December, 1992 Completion of HIP Program Project Touch lease renewal (Rm.C) Public Safety Director Public Works Director Public Works Director City Manager Community Resources Dir. Community Community Community Resources Dir. Resources Dir. Resources Dir. Planning Director Community Resources Dir. ***************************************************************** Upcoming Caltrans Historic Items Not Yet Calendared utility maintenance agrmt. Preservation Ordinance (with Land Use Element) Public Works Director Planning Director ***************************************************************** Initiated by Party Date Council 5/8/90 Re. oil project CUP - define "temporary" as relates to height of project Planning Director Goal 4 5/16/90 Options to computerize per- sonnel as part of payroll function Finance Director Council 8/14/90 Review of standard CUP conditions Planning Dir. Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Public Works Dir. City Mgr.2/21/91 RFP for computer system Data Processing Council 3/12/91 South School Conceptual design Community Resources Council Bid spec. for office systems (furniture) Finance Director Award of bid for purchase of computer equipment for Police Dept. Police Chief Council 6/6/91 Review Bldg/Zoning Code changes to improve liveability Planning Director Staff 7/25/91 Adjustment of Park Tax Building Director Council 8/27 Revision of allowable uses in open space zone Planning Council 9/24/91 Effect of nonconforming ordinance on damaged structures Planning Dept. Report on productivity incentives for employees (GIP) Personnel Director Participate w/school civics program coordinator (GIP) Personnel Director Rental agreement for office copier Interim City Manager Statistical survey - requested at 4/23/91 meeting Report on cost effectiveness of downtown enforcement (GIP) Police/Finance Report on increasing police foot patrol Police Chief TREASURER 'S REPORT - JANUARY 1992 FUND GENERAL 1/1/92 CASH ADJUSTMENTS WARRANTS ADJUSTMENTS 1/31/92 NUMBER ACCOUNT BALANCE BALANCE 001 GENERAL $2,256,522.60 $814,520.08 $144,963.31 $848,332.78 $125,284.53 $2,242,388.68 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT $1,439,428.59 $18,126.57 $8,980.96 $25,988.81 $2,896.91 $1,437,650.40 109 VEHICLE PARKING DIST $163,886.28 $16,304.10 $2,326.63 $7,260.13 $1,441.37 $173,815.51 110 PARKING ($17,813.48) $132,060.89 $0.00 $80,339.74 $115,324.60 ($81,416.93) 115 STATE GAS TAX $1,063,690.73 $50,442.10 $6,636.63 $0.00 $146,875.40 5973,894.06 120 COUNTY GAS TAX $24,499.62 $0.00 $152.86 $0.00 $2,903.42 $21,749.06 125 PARK REC.FAC.TAX $261,960.06 $7,000.00 $1,634.43 $0.00 $23,432.08 $247,162.41 126 RAILROAD RT.OF WAY $1,008,845.28 $75,914.18 $2,807.08 $0.00 $0.00 $1,087,566.54 127 6X UTILITY USERS TAX $172,204.94 $110,861.05 $1,074.43 $0.00 $87,500.00 $196,640.42 140 CDBG $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 145 PROPOSITION A FUND $413,381.19 $18,605.00 $2,579.19 $4,920.87 $1,138.29 $428,506.22 150 GRANT FUND $59,210.76 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,333.33 $55,877.43 155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT $72,231.85 $5,441.37 $450.67 $4,774.83 $222.00 $73,127.06 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE $2,018,754.34 $558.92 $79,262.19 $10,371.68 $112,685.03 $1,975,518.74 170 POLICE ASSET SEIZURE $1,523,343.59 $50,270.00 $9,504.52 582,545.37 $4,562.73 $1,496,010.01 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND $500,872.29 $1,628.50 $3,125.07 $484.36 $0.00 $505,141.50 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT $2,262,361.30 $0.00 $292,860.13 $2,289,204.34 $0.00 $266,017.09 705 SELF INSURANCE FUND. $316,433.64 $370.08 $76,100.00 $102,385.92 541.70 $290,476.10 $13,539,813.58 $1,302,102.84 $632,458.10 $3,456,608.83 5627,641.39 $11,390,124.30 TRUST ACCOUNTS BALANCE RECEIVED PAID BALANCE $1,276.30 $615,360.16 5614,367.81 $2,268.65 GENERAL $545,187.34 $9,996,959.31 PAYROLL $1,323.28 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $1,042,001.96 $542,749.23 INACTIVE DEPOSIT HELD BY FISCAL AGENT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY 5481,282.87 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE OUTSTANDING CHECKS INACTIVE DEPOSIT GARY BRUTSCH, TY TREASURER FEBRUARY 13, 992 $546,510.62 $193,079.04 $353,431.58 $11,038,961.27 BALANCE $11,392,392.85 td February 4, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular,Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 25, 1992 A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR THE FORMATION OF A HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT DURING FY 1992-1993 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the preparation of a report for the formation of the Hermosa Beach Street Lighting District during fiscal year 1992-93. Background: The Street Lighting District provides for the maintenance and operation ofrthe City's Street Lighting program. Analysis: The Street Lighting District must be renewed annually in the same fashion that was utilized in its creation. In approving the attached resolution, the Council authorizes the preparation of a report which will contain plans, specifications, costs and estimated assessments for the Street Lighting District. This report will then be submitted to the City Council at which time the City Council will review the report. Alternatives: Other alternatives available to City Council and considered by staff are: 1. Let the District lapse; thereby, causing a potential increased Lighting Fund obligation of approximately $180,000. 2. Retain the district and modify level of service. Respectfully submitted, ynn A. Terry, P.E. Deputy City Engineer Concu : Liam Glickman, nterim Director of ' .zblic .Works Steve Wisniewski -Interim City Manager Attachments: Resolution Ordering Preparation of Report. pworks/slreport le 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO PREPARE A REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4, CHAPTER 1, PART 2, "LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972", BEING DIVISION 15, STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHTING FIXTURES, APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT WORK AND THE MAINTENANCE THEREOF IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1992 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1993. HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1992-1993 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, proposes to renew the assessment district pursuant to the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Street and Highways Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the said assessment district shall include all parcels of land within the said City and shall be designated as the "HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO.1992-1993"; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to install certain lighting fixtures and appurtenances, and appurtenant work, as shown on Diagram and Plan No. 1992-1993, and as amended, each year as funds become available and as the City Council and City staff designate; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to furnish the energy and to maintain the street lighting system. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Director of Public Works is hereby ordered to prepare and file a report in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", - 1 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 being Division 15, Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the installation of certain street lighting fixtures•, appurtenances and appurtenant work and the maintenance thereof for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 1992 and ending June 30, 1993 all set forth in this resolution. SECTION 2. That a certified copy of this resolution be presented to the said Director of Public Works for his information and guidance. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceeding of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1992. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California , CITY CLERK , CITY ATTORNEY ATTEST: APPRO DfAS TO FORM: pworks/slrepres 2 6Lelytoerg_.., 7;4 February 4, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 25, 1992 A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR THE FORMATION OF A CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT DURING FY 1992-1993 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the preparation of a report for the formation of the Hermosa Beach Crossing Guards Maintenance District during fiscal year 1992-1993. Background: The Crossing Guards Maintenance District provides for the administration of the City's School Children Crossing Guards program. Analysis: The Crossing Guards Maintenance District must be renewed annually in the same fashion that was utilized in its creation. In approving the attached resolution, the Council authorizes the preparation of a report which will contain the plans, specifications, costs, locations of crossing guards, and estimated assessments for the Crossing Guards Maintenance District. This report will then be submitted to the City Council at which time the City Council will review the report. Alternatives: Other alternatives available to City Council and considered by staff are: 1. Let the District lapse; thereby, causing a potential increased General Fund obligation of approximately $57,200. 2. Retain the district and modify level of service. Respectfully submitted, Lynn A. Terry, P.E. G��lliam G1c s an, Interim Deputy City Engineer Dire for o Public Works Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Attachments: Resolution Ordering Preparation of the Report. pworks/cgreport if 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO PREPARE A REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2, CHAPTER 3.5, TITLE 5, OF "THE CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (ACT OF 1974)",BEING DIVISION 2, OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE FORMATION OF A CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1992 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1993. HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1992-1993 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, proposes to establish a "Crossing Guards Maintenance District" pursuant to Article 2, Chapter 3.5, Title 5, of the Crossing Guards Maintenance District Act of 1974, being Division 2 of the Government Code of the State of California; and' WHEREAS, the said assessment district shall include all parcels of land within the said City and shall be designated as the "HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1992-1993"; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to establish A CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT as shown on Diagram and Plan No. 1992-1993, and as amended, each year as funds become available and as the City Council and City staff designate; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to furnish the Crossing Guards Maintenance District services for the said City. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Director of Public Works is hereby ordered to prepare and file a report in accordance with Article 2, Chapter 3.5, Title 5, of the "CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE - 1 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DISTRICT ACT OF 1974", being Division 2 of the Government Code of the State of California, for the establishing and formation of "CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT": in the City of Hermosa Beach, California, for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 1992 and ending June 30, 1993. SECTION 2. That a certified copy of this resolution be presented to the said Director of Public Works for his information and guidance. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceeding of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1992. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM/I) .,) pworks/cgrepres , CITY CLERK , CITY ATTORNEY HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL February 13, 1992 Regular Meeting of February 25, 1992 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #20620 (C.U.P. CON NO. 89-8) LOCATION: 1344 MANHATTAN AVENUE APPLICANT(S): TERRY WETKOWSKI REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A 3 - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #20620 which is consistent with the approved Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map #20620 at their January 16, 1990 meeting. The map was to expire on January 16, 1992. Extension of the map was submitted and was granted by Planning Commission at their January 21, 1992 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: 7 Respectfully submitted, at( P164. Ken Robertson Michael Schubach Associate Planner Planning Director Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager T/srfinmap 2 3 4 _ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #20620 FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1344 MANHATTAN AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on February 25, 1992 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the previsions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 90-6 adopted after hearing on January 16, 1990. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #20620 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 4, Block 49, First Addition to Hermosa Beach, as recorded in Book 1, Pages 59 and 60 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a three - unit condominium project on land commonly known as 1344 Man- hattan Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 25th day of February 1992. ATTEST: T/rsfinmap PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 February 13, 1992 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL February 25, 1992 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #22892 (C.U.P. CON NO. 91-3) LOCATION: 1639 PROSPECT AVENUE APPLICANT(S): JEROME OLGIUN REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A 2 - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #22892 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #22892 at their April 2, 1991 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: / l Michael Schubach Planning Direc;.or Steve Wisniews i Interim City Manager p/srfinmap Respectfully submitted, / en Robertson Associate Planner lh 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #22892 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1639 PROSPECT AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on February 25, 1992 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 91-23 adop- ted after hearing on April 2, 1991. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #22892 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 11, J.M. Floores Subdivision, as recorded in Book 9, Page 127 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 1639 Prospect Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 25th day of February, 1992. ATTEST: tlITOF RM: p/rsfinmap PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 February 13, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of February 25, 1991 INFORMATIONAL REPORT REGARDING THE PROCEDURES ESTABLISHED FOR HANDLING THE NARCOTICS ASSET AND FORFEITURE FUND Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council receive and file this report. Background: At the regular City Council meeting of February 11, 1992, Councilmember Benz requested information regarding the handling of narcotics forfeiture funds, specifically the procedures related to "flash money". Analysis: In September 1986, Hermosa Beach Police Officers assisted U.S. Customs Agents in the service of a federal search warrant at a local Hermosa Beach residence. The search resulted in the seizure of $930,659 in cash and the arrest of three suspects. Under the Federal Forfeited Assets Sharing Program, Hermosa Beach applied for and was awarded a share of the cash in the amount of $232,664. In order to comply with the federal and state regulations for use of forfeited funds, a City policy and procedures for handling the funds was established with the assistance of the City Treasurer and the Finance Director. This policy and procedure document was presented to and approved by Council at the regular Council meeting of May 10, 1988. (Attachment A) At the regular City Council meeting of June 12, 1990, Council approved a request to increase the amount of funds available for purchase of narcotics from drug dealers. (Attachment B) The policy and procedure shown in Attachment B is the current governing policy and procedure has been working very well, is similar to the policies and procedures of other cities, and offers the appropriate checks and balances by the City Treasurer and the Finance Department. - 1 - With specific regard to the use of funds for "flash money", the procedure is as follows: A request is received from the investigators for an amount of money necessary for a flash in a narcotics investigation; A City purchase order is executed and processed in accordance with City procedures; A check is issued to the Director of Public Safety and is given to the investigators; The investigators go to the bank and obtain the cash; The investigators use the money to facilitate their investigation; Once the use is completed, the investigators either 1) return the money to the bank and have it deposited into the City account and submit the receipt of deposit to the City Treasurer, or 2) return the money to the City Treasurer for deposit by the Treasurer's office. The paperwork for the last two transactions of "flash money" are attached as Attachment C and D. Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager 2 cur: Gary t,/. Bfut�ch, City Treasurer Copeland, Director of Finance April 27, 1988 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council A+Mmi4 /} City Council Meeting of May 10, 1988 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING PROCEDURES FOR HANDLING ASSETS WHICH ARE SEIZED AND FORFEITED BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Approve the proposed guidelines for establishment of the Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund and the control and management of the funds in the account. 2. Receive and file this report. BACKGROUND: Hermosa Beach Police Officers assisted U.S. Customs Agents in the service of a federal search warrant at a local Hermosa Beach residence on September 8, 1986. The search resulted in seizure of $930,659 in cash at the residence and the arrest and subsequent conviction of three suspects. Application for a share of the seized money was made with the U.S. Customs Service under the Federal Forfeited Assests Sharing Program. On December 21, 1987, the Hermosa Beach Police Department received $232,664.75 from the U.S. Customs Service. Pending formal guidelines and procedures, a separate account was opened at the Bank of America in Hermosa Beach. The City Treasurer has invested $200,000 in two short term certificate of deposits, yielding a high rate of interest. No expenditures have been made from the account. ANALYSIS: Guidelines regarding seized and forfeited property are set forth in Title 18 and 19 of the United States Code as well as Chapter 9 of the Health and Safety Code of California. Additionally, the United States Attorney General has issued guidelines regarding seized and forfeited property. The most important guideline which the City must keep in mind are that the funds must be used for law enforcement purposes only. All of the guidelines state that the assets must be used to supplement, not replace or decrease, normal \ ap_'oprfations for the deaar men o •o so cou • cause tie oss o ui;ure i awards. 9', 1 asset In order to establish the proper procedures for administering the assets, we contacted several cities that have experience in dealing with seized funds. Among those were the cities of Montebello, Bell, Arcadia, and Redondo Beach. After carefully considering all of the information received, the proposed guide- lines were written. We feel that these guidelines will offer proper management and accountability of funds awarded to the Hermosa Beach Police Department. CONCUR: Kevin B. Northc aft, City Manager NOT Gary'L. Br sch, City Treasurer aA4: Viki Copeland, Finance Administrator 2 tfully fitted, Steve S. isniewski Director of Public Safety HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT ASSET SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE FUND PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the establishment of the Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund and the control and management of the funds in this account. POLICY: Assets seized by, or forfeited to, the City of Hermosa Beach Police Department are distributed according to Title 18 and 19 of the United States Code as well as Chapter 9 of the Health and Safety Code of California. These assets can only be used for law enforcement purposes and are intended to supplement, not replace or reduce, normal appropriations for the operation of the Department. A special fund, titled "Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund", shall be established to record the receipts and disbursements of the seized and forfeited assets. A separate account, titled "Special Investigations", shall be established to record all expenditures necessary for the operation of a narcotics/vice investi- gation program. A budget for expenditures necessary for this program will be formulated in accordance with the established budgetary processes currently utilized in the City. Expenditures made from the Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund and/or the Special Investigations account will be made in accordance with the City's established purchase procedures. The City Treasurer may invest money from the fund in short or long term interest earning accounts in order to increase the amount of the fund. All interest earned from investments of money from the fund shall be credited to the fund. Non-cash assets seized and distributed to the Hermosa Beach Police Department will be recorded as fixed assets according to the City's established procedure. The use and method of disposition of seized non-cash assets will be subject to Council approval. Proceeds from the sale of seized non-cash assets will be deposited into the Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund. A monthly financial report, showing all interest, expenditures and receipts from or to the fund will be submitted to the City Council each month by the Finance Department. PROCEDURE: All money received by the Police Department through United States Code 18 and 19, and Chapter 9 of the California Health and Safety Code will be deposited into the Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund. 1 asset, Non -money assets distributd to the Police Department will be appraised and will be recorded within the City's fixed asset system. the intent to retain or dispose of non -money assets will be submitted by the Director of Public Safety to the City Manager for approval within thirty days of receipt of such assets. In order to have funds available to serve as a "flash" roll to 'show' a suspected criminal that we have the money to purchase illegal merchandise, the Treasurer will assure that there is a minimum of $20,000 available in the fund at all times. The amount of money necessary will be released to the Director of Public Safety, or other personnel authorized by the Director, by a check drawn on the fund. The Director of Public Safety is authorised to approve any amount, up to $20,000, for flash purposes, and will be responsible for the return of the money at the earliest possible time. Requests for amounts larger than $20,000 will be approved by the City Manager. The Finance Department and the Treasurer's office will expedite all such requests in order to facilitate crimi- nal investigations. In order to have funds readily available for the purpose of purchasing evidence such as narcotics and stolen merchandise, the Police Department shall maintain a cash account of $1,000. When expenditures are made from this account, the Director of Public Safety will submit a memo to the Finance Department showing the amount and purpose of the expenditure. On receipt, the Finance Department will reimburse the amount with a check to the Director of Public Safety, drawn on the Forfeiture Fund. 2 assetel 4*Achrne,..,3 E, May 21, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 12, 1990 RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE CHANGES IN THE PROCEDURES FOR HANDLING THE ASSET AND FORFEITURE FUNDS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the raising of the cash account limit from $1,000 to $3,000 in the procedure for handling the asset and for- feiture funds. BACKGROUND: At the regular City Council meeting of May 10, 1988 Council approved a policy and procedures for the control and management of funds in the asset seizure and forfeiture account. ANALYSIS: Over the last two years, there have been many changes in the narcotics investi- gation area. Some of the most apparent are that the cost of the drugs has risen and our officers have become increasingly effective in making good arrests of the dealers. In order to facilitate the arrest of drug dealers, officers must buy drugs from the dealer or one of the dealer's partners. The cost of these buys has steadily risen over the last two years. Sometimes, the officers must let the dealer take the money in order to get more drugs or more suspects. In those cases, the procedure is called "letting the money walk". In the cases where the dealer is immediately arrested, called a "buy - bust", the money is recovered. When we established the guidelines for use of the asset seizure fund, a cash account for buy money was established at a $1,000 limit. Because of the rise in drug prices and the officer's increased activity, this limit is not workable. 1 1f As an example; one purchase of a small street quantity (1 ounce) of cocaine is between $800 and $1,000. There have been many situations where the officers were hampered in their investigation by the limited funds. Just recently, the officers needed to make two purchases of drugs in order to obtain the evidence necessary for several arrests and search warrants. As usual most of this acti- vity takes place on the weekends and/or at night. Because they did not have the funds available to cover the expenses, the Chief of Police gave them personal funds to cover the purchases. This is not an acceptable alternative to having the funds available, they can't put the dealer on hold and we shouldn't have to use personal funds to do our job. The subsequent arrests and searchs netted the team over $6,000 cash, an automobile was seized, 6 people were arrested, and over 1 and a half kilos of cocaine were confiscated and taken off the street. We are requesting that the limit be raised to $3,000. We feel that this amount will allow us enough money to cover the busy weekends and will allow limited flash money capability. Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager Noted: 614L:C41-€24.0 Viki Copeland Director of Finance 2 Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT ASSET SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE FUND PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the establishment of the Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund and the control and management of the funds in this account. POLICY: Assets seized by, or forfeited to, the City of Hermosa Beach Police Department are distributed according to Title 18 and 19 of the United States Code as well as Chapter 9 of the Health and Safety Code of California. These assets can only be used for law enforcement purposes and are intended to supplement, not replace or reduce, normal appropriations for the operation of the Department. A special fund, titled "Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund", shall be established to record the receipts and disbursements of the seized and forfeited assets. A separate account, titled "Special Investigations", shall be established to record all expenditures necessary for the operation of a narcotics/vice investi--- gation program. A budget for expenditures necessary for this program will be formulated in accordance with the established budgetary processes currently utilized in the City. Expenditures made from the Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund and/or the Special Investigations account will be made in accordance with the City's established purchase procedures. The City Treasurer may invest money from the fund in short or long term interest earning accounts in order to increase the amount of the fund. All interest earned from investments of money from the fund shall be credited to the fund. Non-cash assets forfeited to, and used by the Hermosa Beach Police Department will be recorded as fixed assets according to the City's established procedure. The use or sale of seized vehicles will be subject to Council approval upon recommendation by the Director of Public Safety. Proceeds from the sale of seized vehicles or property will be deposited into the Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund. A monthly financial report, showing all interest, expenditures and receipts from or to the fund will be submitted to the City Council each month by the, Finance Department. PROCEDURE: All money received by the Police Department through United States Code 18 and 19, and Chapter 9 of the California Health and Safety Code will be deposited into the Hermosa Beach Police Department Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund. 5-15-90 1 Non -money assets distributed to the Police Department will be appraised and will be recorded within the City's fixed asset system. the intent to retain or dispose of non -money assets will be submitted by the Director of Public Safety to the City Manager for approval within thirty days of receipt of such assets. In order to have funds available to serve as a "flash" roll to 'show' a suspected criminal that we have the money to purchase illegal merchandise, the Treasurer will assure that there is a minimum of $20,000 available in the fund at all times., The amount of money necessary will be released to the Director of Public Safety, or other personnel authorized by the Director, by a check drawn on the fund. The Director of Public Safety is authorized to approve any amount, up to $20,000, for flash purposes, and will be responsible for the return of the money at the earliest possible time. Requests for amounts larger than $20,000 will be approved by the City Manager. The Finance Department and the Treasurer's office will expedite all such requests in order to facilitate criminal investigations. In order to have funds readily available for the purpose of purchasing evidence such as narcotics and stolen merchandise, the Police Department shall maintain a cash account of $3,000. When expenditures are made from this account, the Director of Public Safety will submit a memo to the Finance Department showing amounts expended and the associated case or file number of the expenditure for periodic reimbursement of the account through normal demand and warrants procedures with a check to the Director of Public Safety, drawn on the Forfeiture Fund. 5-24-90 2 03.98 22 ACCOUNT NO. 4 A dim .1(1 . . 039822 4116 170-400-2103-4322 SPECIAL INVESTIGATIDNS $20,000.00 FUNDS `0 i a'-- DATE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA rl :•• TQTAL TREASURER OF THE ity ofermosa 1�3eacLcv Civic Center,1315 Valley Drive„ Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3$85 • WARRANT '"Mt****!********* ** PAY.TO THE ORDER OF STEVE WISNIEWSKI -$rBCIAI, INVESTIGATIONS FUNDS $20,000.00 BANK OF AMERIck�,] NATIONAL MAT N MVIIIOS YlOCUTIP(+lc HERMOSA BEACH BRANCH CHECK NO. 039822 2.,.11.. � Vii•_;.: -;-.. .. AMOUNT: $4,9! NOT VALID AFTER SIX MONTHS FROM QATE: MYOR' ATTEST 00 3 cut 2 2u' r, .L a 2nOf P lr: OOE 3B»ao ?flow DATE 2-4-92 CITY OF HERMOSA PURCHASE ORDER This Purchase Order i •• .., without authorized sig .' ACCTS PAYABLE ACCOUNT NUMBER 170-400-2103-4322 REQUESTED BY WISNIEWSKI Al Purchases are subject to the conditions printed on the reverse side of this sheet Mail two (2) copies of your invoices - c/o Finance Department, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-0299. rTO: PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER I yel'�! 1992 r REC'DV 04116 DELIVER MERCHANDISE TO CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH c/o POLICE DEPT_ INTERIM BNSXXKKXXXINX CITY MANAGER 7 Distribution Area: STEVE WISNIEWSKI Warrant QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL FLASH NARCOTICS MONEY NOTE: PLEASE AUTHORIZE FOR PRE-RELEASE PRIOR TO NEXT PAYMENT SCHEDULE. $20,000.00 ::TOTAL 20,000.00 I hereb request t is order DEPA3 SNIEWSKI, INTERIM CITY MANAGER I hereby certify that this orderyuuthQrIzed CITY MANAGER. It - RECEIPT OF MATERIAL 1 hereby cert that the goods or services u specified hereon have been that thgqqualities are properly stated. Date Funds Available $ Date APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT This Invegmg for payment in the amount . d $ Date RECEIVING COPY CIT% OF HERMOSA BEACH .1apeAtePIPWRIAMINkfilfirliiiir BATE PLEASE SIGN IN TELLER S PRESENCE FOR CASH RECEIVED EH Bank of America Hamwaa Baacn Branch OOQ P.O. Box 45$ Ham oU Baacn, CA 90234 ci LIST CHECKS Checking Deposit BY BANK Nq DOLLARS CENTS CURRENCY ''-•`.� 2 p, n ^,-, ,_ ;, ) COIN 1/7 CHECKS TOTALED ON R Of ChE�CS - LIST L jj ` C ATE SUBTOTAL {{��I 4 LESS CASH RECEIVC-0'' ,'. TOTAL DEPOSIT 463 FEi $ d b� I: L 2 200066 LI: 006 3811.&0 2000 TELLS P.O. NO. ACCOUNT 44*hm N+ 039646 TREASURER OF THE City of 2lermosa T3each_ Civic Center,1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90264-3885 WARRANT "- DATE 01-15-92 , CALIFORNIA TOTAL $50,000.00 BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST ND SAMOS A.ppATgd HERMOSA BEACH BRANCH 16-66 1220 039646 CHECK NO. AMOUNT 39646 $50,000.00 **************$50,000.00***************** PAY TO THE ORDER OF STEVE WISNIEWSKI SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS NOT VALID AFTER SIX MONTHS FROM DATE ATTEST MAYOR • e0i964F,0 Ni22(?nc?tIF,11: 001;3A...60200x' CITY TREASURER ".-._ ".,. INVQILE AMOUNT 4101 170-400-2103-4322 NARCOTICS FLASH MONEY $50,000.00 (DI(0 ) gi 7/ TREASURER OF THE City of 2lermosa T3each_ Civic Center,1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90264-3885 WARRANT "- DATE 01-15-92 , CALIFORNIA TOTAL $50,000.00 BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST ND SAMOS A.ppATgd HERMOSA BEACH BRANCH 16-66 1220 039646 CHECK NO. AMOUNT 39646 $50,000.00 **************$50,000.00***************** PAY TO THE ORDER OF STEVE WISNIEWSKI SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS NOT VALID AFTER SIX MONTHS FROM DATE ATTEST MAYOR • e0i964F,0 Ni22(?nc?tIF,11: 001;3A...60200x' CITY TREASURER DATE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ACCTS PAYABLE PURCHASE ORDER This Purchase Order is I without authorized sign 1992 ACCOUNT NUMBER :70-400-03-432: REQUESTED BY STSN:SK: AN Purchases are subject to the conditions printed on the reverse side of this sheet Mail two (2) copies of your invoices - c/o Finance Department, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-0299- STEVE ,.,N1E'>\. SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS L 1 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER RECD. 04101 DELIVER MERCHANDISE TO CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH c/o POLICc Distribution Area: ///.5/9...? Warrant No.: 49 QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL FLASH NOTE: NARCOTICS MONEY PLEASE AUTHORIZE FOR PRE RELEASE PRIOR TO NEXT PAUENT SCHEDVUEE. 350,000.00 / TOTAL - $50,000.00 I hereb 3E uest this or PARTMENT HEAD I hereby certify that this order is au orized EVE irISNIEWSKI, INTERIM CITY MA NAGERcITYMANA ER RE EIPT OF MATERIAL I hereby been BY $ or ice the G '• • ie and afied hereon have a are properly stated Date Funds Available $ Date APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT ThisS for payment in the amount — i Date RECEIVING COPY C EC,<ING(1'_ Daf•:si'. Tota: CRY OF HERMOSA BEACH u, JAN 24'91 DATE tyASE SIGN IN TELLER'S PRESENCE FOR CASH RECENED. 01 sink of America "f.,. 14,4moss &NM Orvrh 0003 P.O. kw 451 Herrman Bud% CA 90254 a'= :.int Hwk r 0n.:71_902O *h;nk You UST cHECKs Checking Deposit 0.11;:, DOLLARS CENTS CURREN «) f.A.vioot) CHECKS TOTAL OF C$ S USTED 0 14 Sr A "'*" _ SUBTOTAL '—' - 4 LESS CASH RECEIVED I 1 0eww■ur,ggiC_ TOTAL DEPOSIT rc, JA 2 200066 ii: 006381,480 200e TSI TELLER Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 25, 1992 SUBJECT: FIRST QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PURPOSE: TO INITIATE CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO RELOCATE THE BICYCLE ROUTE TO ALONG THE STRAND NORTH OF 24TH STREET Staff recommends the adoption of the attached resolution of intent to begin the process to amend the Circulation Element as directed by Council at the February 11, 1992 meeting. At their meeting of February 18, 1992, The Planning Commission also recommended consideration of an amendment to relocate the bicycle route. Prior to any action on this suggested amendment publicly noticed public hearings must be conducted for both the Planning Commission and City Council. Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager Attachments 1. Resolution of Intent 2. Council Minutes 2/11/92 3. P.C. Staff Report 2/18/92 Respectfully Submitted,, 7,1-1777-1,4 Michael Schubach, Planning Director p/memol lj' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 92- A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN REGARDING THE LOCATION OF THE COASTAL BICYCLE ROUTE WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on February 25, 1992, to consider amendment of the Circulation Element to relocate the official bicycle route between 24th Street and the north City boundary from Hermosa Avenue to the Strand, and made the following findings: A. The Circulation Element establishes the bicycle route along the Strand south of 24th Street but it switches to Hermosa -Avenue between 24th Street and the north City boundary; B. Changing the route to exclusively along the Strand should be considered for purposes of improving circulation; improving the scenic qualities of the bike route; providing a better connection to the bike route in Manhattan Beach; and to eliminate hazards created by the conflict between bicycles and cars along Hermosa Avenue; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby' initiate consideration of an amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan regarding bicycle routes and directs staff to conduct the environmental assessment, and schedule for public hearings. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1992, by: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED ASTOFORM: CITY CLERK 11( CITY ATTORNEY p/ccrsint 1 HEARING 6. APPROVAL OF STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH PLANS, INCLUDING THE REPAIR OF STRAND BIKEWAY ON THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND THE NORTH CITY LIMIT; A NEW ALIGNMENT AT 35TH STREET; WIDENING OF 24TH STREET BETWEEN THE STRAND AND HERMOSA AVENUE; AND AN ASPHALT OVERLAY OF THE BIKEWAY BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET. (Continued from January 28, 1992 meeting.) Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated February 6, 1992. JIM LISSNER - ASKED IF THERE HAD BEEN A SURVEY RE. "NO SITTING ON THE WALL". JERRY COMPTON - TALKED ABOUT DESIGN OF STRAND WALL, POSSIBLY HAVING INDENTATIONS FOR TRASH BARRELS AND LIGHT POLES AND THAT THERE SHOULD BE SOME PLACE COMFORTABLE TO SIT. JOHN RYAN - SPOKE TO ASKING FOR GRANT EXTENSION. JOE DIMONDA - CONCURS WITH COMPTON. JAMES SPENSER - 142 MONTEREY - HEAVY EQUIPMENT CONTRACTOR. LEAVES'TOO MUCH FOR IMAGINATION, TOO MUCH ELASTICITY IN THE PLANS, NOT SPECIFIC ENOUGH, DIMENSIONS NONEXISTENT, NO LINEAL �.^ f a FOOTAGE, NOT P7 ---.DY TO BID. WOULD TAKE PLANS WITH HIM AND BRING BACK A LIST OF THINGS THAT NEED TO BE DETAILED. (WM. GLICKMAN GAVE HIM A SET 10 TAKE.) JUNE WILLIAMS - SAID SHE THINKS P.W. STAFF IS VERY GOOD, AND LAUGHING AT STAFF IS RUDE. GENE DREHER AND DANA SHAW MADE DEROGATORY REMARKS. DAVE REIMER - REGARDING PRIVATE FENCES ON STRAND PROPERTY - THE PEOPLE WHO OWN THE FENCES SHOULD HAVE TO PAY TO REBUILD THEM PROPERLY - NOT THE CITY. MOTION KM/SE - TO APPROVE OPTION NO. 2 TO GO BEFORE LACTC AND REQUEST A TIME EXTENSION FOR THE GRANT. PLANS NOT ADEQUATE. SO ORDERED. RE - IMPRESSIONS OF THIS DRAWING; DO WE WANT TO CONTINUE THE STRAND; WHAT KIND OF LOAD IS PLANNED; DO WE LIKE THE PLAN WITH INDENTATIONS. KM WANTS TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS. MOTION RB/SE TO SEND TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO MAKE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO REDESIGNATE BIKE PATH SO WHOLE STRAND NORTH OF 24TH ST. BE PART OF PATH. VOTE: OK 3-2 (KM/AW-NO) IF RESO. OF INTENT REQUIRED, WILL BRING BACK ON CONSENT CALENDAR NEXT MTG. oa/t/ Q L CLty - Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission February 13, 1992 Regular Meeting of February 18, 1992 SUBJECT: FIRST QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS Recommendation 1. Direct staff by minute order to conduct the environmental assessment and schedule for public hearing an amendment to the Circulation Element regarding the route of the Strand bike path. 2. Direct staff regarding any other desired amendments. Background It is the time of the year to schedule first quarter General Plan amendments. State law allows cities to amend the General Plan four times per year. The Planning Commission or City Council may initiate General Plan amendments. At their meeting of February 11, the City Council requested that the Commission begin the process for amending the Circulation Element to re-route the coastal bicycle route along the entire length of the Strand, including the area from 24th Street to the north city boundary. Analysis At this time no private projects have been submitted and staff has no other suggestions for areas to be considered. As noted above, and because of the repair and maintenance work being contemplated for the Strand bike path, it would seem appropriate to begin the process for consideration of a change to the Circulation Element. Currently section 4.9 establishes the bicycle route to be along the Strand from the south city boundary to 24th Street, and then along Hermosa Avenue from 24th Street to the north city boundary. Michael §chubach Planning Director Attachment 1. 2/11/92 City Council action minutes p/memogpa 12 25 FEBRUARY 1992 TO: HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL, SUBJECT: NORTH -END BIKE PATH, 4J -et 51 FEB 2 992 r11, \...i City Clerk /....�, City of Hermes/1862=h\,P I AM THE OWNER OF 3220 THE STRAND (3 HOUSES NORTH OF LONGFELLOW) AND HAVE LIVED THERE FOR THE PAST 8 YEARS. I AM ALSO A SERIOUS BIKE RIDER. PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING WHEN YOU DECIDE THE FATE OF THE NORTH -END BIKE PATH: 1. ALL SERIOUS BIKE RIDERS (HIGH SPEED BIKES) USE THE EXISTING BIKE PATH AND NOT THE STRAND SIDEWALK FOR TWO SIMPLE REASONS - * BIKE SPEED CANNOT BE MAINTAINED ON THE STRAND SIDEWALK BECAUSE OF THE TRAFFIC WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL RISK, AND * CLIP -INS MAKE IT INCONVENIENT TO DISMOUNT AND WALK DOWN THE STEPS BETWEEN THE STRAND SIDEWALKS AT THE BORDER OF MANHATTAN BEACH AND HERMOSA BEACH. SINCE MAJOR ACCIDENTS ARE CAUSED BY HIGH-SPEED BIKES AND NOT BY CRUSIERS, THE STEPS EFFECTIVELY SEPARATE THE HIGH SPEED BIKES FROM THE WALKERS/SKATERS ON THE STRAND SIDEWALK AND HENCE PREVENT MAJOR ACCIDENTS ON THE NORTH -END STRAND SIDEWALK. 2. ELIMINATING THE BIKE PATH NEXT TO HERMOSA AVE. AND CONVERTING IT TO AND UNCONTROLLED DIAGONAL PARKING LOT WOULD BE A SERIOUS MISTAKE FOR THE FOLLOWING 4 REASONS - * IT WOULD INCREASE BIKE ACCIDENTS ON THE STRAND SIDEWALK, * IT WOULD PROVIDE MORE PARKING THAT WILL RESULT IN MORE OVERCROWDING IN AN ALREADY CONGESTED AREA, * IT WOULD PROMOTE AFTER DARK PROBLEMS SUCH AS ROBBERIES, LOUD NOISE (GETTO BLASTERS), AND FIGHTS JUST LIKE THE PROBLEMS THAT ARE OCCURING IN OTHER AREAS WHERE SIMILAR PARKING LOTS EXIST SUCH AS PLAYA DEL REY (BALONA CREEK) AND MANHATTAN BEACH (ROSECRANS) , AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION i * IT WOULD JEPARDIZE THE PRIVACY THAT THE RESIDENTS ALONG THE STRAND NOW ENJOY BECAUSE PEOPLE FROM THE PARKING LOT WOULD ACCESS THE BEACH THROUGH THE WALKWAYS BETWEEN THE STRAND HOUSES. I BELIEVE A WORKABLE SOLUTION TO THIS PROBLEM MIGHT BE TO RETAIN THE BIKE TRAIL NEXT TO HERMOSA AVE. FOR THE HIGH SPEED BIKES AND TO CONNECT THE HERMOSA BEACH STRAND SIDEWALK TO THE MANHATTAN BEACH BIKE TRAIL IN A MANNER AS DEPICTED IN THE ENCLOSED SKETCH. RESPECTIVELY, PETER W. BICHE THE CREAT 61KE PAT %I Co eowtlSE /,IERry c A 513 N oLhs 6KI STI N p-STE Ps .0/ sf60 8'4 SraP Ex'sTl NF—g.1KC-P-ATN �nLERi� (fie 414 ti TT AV IEgc B 1K E-frAtN MgNgAeTAN Bac 14 H EgivtosA AVE, STRAND • 5 pezb Bu4,14“).5 /S/GNsScow wtER(F..,1G. B/KF&C Awo 5A%coL EE 14 1s41 SPEct Q Ike 4.1 TO CASE" EXIST/+.J& alk PATH. • WAG/dd/2S (.SSE Ek./ST/ MJF+ STEPS To Fo Se'TWd6N 1-16.eW►osA ANO Ju4Nf1 *TT $14 STRA Nps. • Ro131.ADES(S cA Gs Foci -' R4Is6R PA'[ R 0Z LAs E $ Eps The Honorable City Council Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach CA 90254 Honorable Councilmembers, RECEIVED FE8 4 1992 CITY MGR. n" -SCE Feb.24 1992 We have just been made aware of an action pending before the council with regard to the city officially moving the bike path from its present location, an asphalt strip running parallel to Hermosa Ave., to the concrete surface of The Strand. It is our understanding that city staff has recommended the action so that the City can justify the collection of funds from Los Angeles County in the amount of $700,000 in order to improve the existing surface of The Strand. I applaud City staff for their efforts to acquire outside funding to improve and maintain city property, especially when the Strand presents such a popular location for use by non-residents. This plan, however, seems to have overlooked major financial and moral considerations that will prove damaging to our city image and very costly to all residents of Hermosa Beach. The current bikepath configuration available to bike riders at the point it joins the "bike -use -only" Hermosa Beach asphalt path with the Manhattan Beach "bike -use -only" path, which runs adjacent to the Manhattan Strand, reduces bicycle congestion on the Hermosa Strand by at least 70 to 80 percent. Even with this relief the Hermosa Strand congestion on weekends and holidays is severe, presenting extreme risk of injury to pedestrians, baby carriage users and roller -skaters. The various walk street intersections are especially dangerous. On high use days the accident and injury frequency is already so high that city controls and enforcement techniques have been subject to considerable criticism. This criticism has in the past caused city government to consider restricting bike traffic exclusively to the asphalt bike path, thus eliminating Strand bike traffic, in the most congested areas, and thereby reducing injuries even further. I was therefore surprised to learn of the pending action having expected all this time that the city would execute the bicycle traffic alternative which would have made the Strand much more safe for all users. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 11 In light of the accident history already experienced with the present configuration, and considering prior governmental discussions relative to that history, a total elimination of the asphalt bikepath would not only be morally reprehensible but would also expose the city and Hermosa Beach taxpayers to the severe jeopardy of having to pay major personal injury awards in future lawsuits resulting from Strand accidents and injuries. The reason for this severe legal problem is that the crisis level of bicycle related Strand injuries has already been officially recognized by city government. Personal liability lawyers will see the city as easy pickings because the evidence available to them for court will not only include prior knowledge on the part of city officials, but negligence as well. Negligence will apply because the contemplated action of eliminating the asphalt bike path will provide legal and moral proof that the city council exacerbated an already dangerous bicycle condition by increasing the congestion/injury problem rather than controlling or reducing it. Seven hundred thousand dollars is a drop in the bucket when compared to the potential collective and individual liability that will accompany the passage of this action contempla ` by the council. The moral considerations are f.r great u �c 14. /,►/P' ..��• en an Adri-�ne Downing 319 The S'rand He mosa Beach 411. cc: Honorable Deane Dana Los Angeles County Counsel County Supervisor Honorable members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Board Charles Vose Hermosa Beach City Attorney Dewitt Clinton County Counsel to/Steve Wisniewski City Manager (DENN CURTIN STUDIO INC. 446 NORTH LA BREA AVENUE, LOS ANGELES 90036 213 936-1131 pct v-k.fivA,..e.6a a/..dreZ �l�lG eo lie o; A-zemie .mead, .. ea, .&aui. �v�Y SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 11 California'• K C.i L • I \ �J O ,, . .ter/"1 /' 7 �� r l.Nc/0 aA<Lez4/7.1"1‘ aiae&ei . 1" Lt)._a-c/z,21-71-4- • J/(0 -,J 5515 Melrose Avenue/Hollywood, California 90038-3149/213-467-9999 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1j' ,/4 i1 i �L�� ��✓`t�--�-7 SUPPLEMENT& INFORMATION 1j G Coi,cki� //19 i 774E- 7?/ikE- PA -77/ 77if-= WIZ 7--#25W 'FLo of blEoeffisn, f}c�}iva> 711 -AT Wou.023c/N6, Pt7D/n°/u794— Htig'./iU6(A&'b -r#U5 PYThD/77610K. T�ic- 776U) '7a 77iis v�y uigzRoW -1•11:) o� 451z iVnstl- AJEN ,JjJicfr / S f}L'DY "TOO,-- Wouc.,D MA -K- �7 EVIEXJ 44AzARIx(hs-r-PAA.) !T /S kow. -T1114-/JK `hoc{ 4=-0(0 4a l)t a /2 7C-' yz SUPPLEMENTAL di • INFORMATIO ! aeryi L? -7 k7 -1 -Qi' -e' ac.Ai - Gr/L G�-O�c SGLfz� 460 4A. - u�- /61C/1-VrD a. -� '21 p -/Ke - l� r (1c7A-e__ „a-6)-(.;, - w -A14 -c- pec-eA. C-XA-(-- 4 e r12) t , LJ4 Ps (A d /tt/L1jYaV. '116 ARTHUR MAZIROW 2918 THE STRAND • HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254-2036 • (310) 376-6690 • FAX (310) 376-2650 February 25, 1992 Mayor Kathleen Midstokke City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 By NOW Courier Re: Proposal to Adopt a Resolution of Intent to Initiate a General Plan Amendment to the Circulation Element Regarding the Location of the Coastal Bicycle Route Dear Mayor Midstokke and Members of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach: The purpose of this letter is to advise you that I am opposed to the proposal to change the present bicycle circulation route from Hermosa Avenue, between 24th Street and 35th Street (which I will refer to as the "Existing Route"), to the Strand between 24th Street and 35th Street (which I will refer to as the "Proposed Route"). The reasons for my opposition to the proposed change are as follows: 1. Safety, a. The proposal to change the route seems to assume that the Existing Route is not used by bicyclists and that the Proposed Route is underutilized. Neither assumption is correct. They are not correct because of the following facts: (1) The Existing Route is used extensively by bicyclists going both in a northerly and southerly direction and it is very crowded, particularly on sunny Saturday and Sunday afternoons. However, based upon my observation, it is not used to any significant extent by walkers, joggers, baby carriage pushers, dog walkers, roller skaters, roller bladers, and skate boarders. Those persons do not use the Existing Route because of the narrowness of the Existing Route and the volume of the bicycle traffic. That fact makes the Existing Route unique to bicycle riding in the City of Hermosa Beach in that the Existing Route is almost exclusively used by bicyclists and not others. (2) The Proposed Route is used extensively by walkers, joggers, baby carriage pushers, dog walkers, roller skaters, roller bladers, skate boarders and bicyclists. The assumption that the Proposed Route is underutilized is just not accurate. It is as extensively used as any other part of the Strand except for those portions of the Strand adjacent to Pier Avenue. b. The City is well aware of the dangerous situation on the Strand created by the hazards of the walkers, joggers, baby carriage pushers, dog walkers, roller skaters, roller bladers, skate boarders and bicyclists all using the Strand. In order to reduce that danger the City has: (1) Placed flashing yellow lights adjacent to Pier Avenue which require bicyclists to dismount from their bicycles; (2) Placed speed limits on bicyclists using the Strand; (3) Placed cautionary signs on the Strand regarding safe biking procedures; (4) Removed all benches from the Strand (with the exemption of two) so as to reduce the hazards of Strand use. c. If the Proposed Route is adopted by the City Council, the result will be an increase of bicyclists on the Proposed Route with the attendant dangers that the City is so aware. It is not as if the Proposed Route is not utilized by bicyclists because it is clearly used extensively for that purpose. All that would be accomplished by closing the Existing Route will be to compress two bicycle routes into one route. The people who normally use the Strand will continue to do so. d. The Existing Route is the entryway to our city from the north and the exit from our city. Bicyclists use the Existing Route because it is convenient, faster and safer than using the Proposed Route. They could, at this time, use the Proposed Route and they do. However, they can only do so if they dismount from their bicycles and carry the bicycles down the stairs or up the stairs at 35th Street. e. The original notice given by the City Clerk of the hearing before the City Council on January 28, 1992 concerned only the repair of the Existing Route and the alignment of the Existing Route with the bicycle path of Manhattan Beach that starts at the common boundary line between Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach. That proposal made a lot of sense. The Existing Route is so successful in reducing the bicycle traffic on the Strand that perhaps the City Council should give consideration to an extension of the Existing Route to the south boundary line of the City. 2. The Existing Route is the old Red Car route. Before the City terminates the Existing Route as a bike path, the status of the title should be examined to determine if the City is in danger of losing the title to the Existing Route by reason of some restriction in the deed. That type of restriction is not unusual. 3. Because of the compressing of two bicycle paths into one, if the proposed change is adopted, the City will probably have to retain a consultant to prepare an environmental impact report to evaluate the impact of the closing of the Existing Route because there will certainly be an increase in bicycle traffic on the Strand. 4. Assuming that the proposal to close down the Existing Route is adopted by the City Council, what will the City do with that abandoned route? This assumes the City retains control and ownership over it even though it is no longer used as a bike path. I have heard mentioned that if the Existing Route was abandoned then the City should consider the complete realignment of Hermosa Avenue to permit diagonal parking. Diagonal parking will have, in my view, the following impact: a. There will be a significant dollar cost to the City to realign Hermosa Avenue so as to eliminate the existing median strip that exists between 26th Street and 35th Street on Hermosa Avenue as well as a realignment of the existing lighting, grading of the street as well as all Mayor Kathleen Midstokke February 25, 1992 Page 3 incidental items that have to be accomplished when a street is adjusted. I do not know what the cost will be, but in all probability it will be substantial. b. The homes that are on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, facing Hermosa Avenue, will now be adjacent to a parking lot. I suspect that the situation will be very similar to the El Porto parking lot in Manhattan Beach. This will result in reduction in value of the homes facing Hermosa Avenue with a reduction in property tax revenue from those homes. 5. Availability of County Money. I understand that one of the prime reasons for the proposed change of bicycle route is the availability of County money. Since all decisions of governing bodies involve the balancing of various factors, it seems clear to me that the dangers that result from compressing two bicycle paths into one with the resulting loss of safety for the citizens of the City of Hermosa Beach and its visitors and the increased liability of the City for such accidents outweighs the value of receiving "free money" for improvement of the Strand along the Proposed Route. If the City Council really wants to improve the Proposed Route, it has been my experience that governing bodies generally will find resources to do that which they really want to do. Paragraph B of Proposed Resolution 92 that is being presented to the City Council this evening states as follows: "Changing the route to exclusively along the Strand should be considered for the purposes of improving circulation; improving the scenic qualities of the bike route; providing a better connection to the bike route in Manhattan Beach; and to eliminate hazards created by the conflict between bicycles and cars along Hermosa Avenue;" Breaking down Paragraph B into its component concepts, my comments concerning each of them are the following: 1. "Improving Circulation": It does not appear to me that the compressing of two bicycle routes into one is going to result in improving circulation unless the volume of users is reduced, which obviously is not likely. The original proposal of the Planning Department was to extend the Manhattan Beach bike path onto the Existing Route. That extension could be in a straight line because both the Manhattan Beach bicycle path and the Hermosa Beach Existing Route are the old Red Car right-of-way that are merely separated by approximately one hundred feet of sand and concrete barrier. If the purpose is to improve circulation, the extension of the Manhattan Beach bicycle path onto the Hermosa Beach Existing Route is the most logical because it is a straight connection. Any other circulation plan will require a significant jog in the bike path from where it ends in Manhattan Beach onto the Strand in Hermosa Beach. I estimate that the Strand in Hermosa Beach is approximately ninety feet west of the Manhattan Beach bike path. 2. "Improving the scenic qualities of the bike route": It is hard to argue with that statement, however, it must be kept in mind that the Existing Route is used by large numbers of Mayor Kathleen Midstokke February 25, 1992 Page 4 bicyclists every day of the week and particularly on Saturday and Sunday and they are consciously making the decision that they would rather use the Existing Route than the Proposed Route because of convenience and safety. - 3. "Providing a better connection to the bike route in Manhattan Beach": As stated earlier, in order to connect up the Manhattan Beach bike path with the Proposed Route will require a significant jog of the bike path onto the sand in order to connect up with the Strand. The better connection is merely to extend the Existing Route to connect up on a straight line with the Manhattan Beach bike path, which of course was the original plan. 4. "To eliminate hazards created by the conflict between bicycles and cars along Hermosa Avenue": At 35th Street there is no conflict because cars do not bisect the Existing Route. There are two other automobile intersections with the Existing Route at Longfellow Avenue and 28th Street, but those intersections through the Existing Route are predominantly used by residents of the Strand who are well aware of the dangers and the need to be extraordinarily careful when crossing the Existing Route. At the southerly end of the Existing Route there is some conflict, however, there was a small barrier on the street to protect bicyclists but it was recently removed. I am sure that there are alternatives to solving the automobile traffic at the south end, however, I have no expertise in that area. In conclusion, I believe that after taking all of the factors above mentioned into consideration, that the City Council should not change the Existing Route. AM:mc cc by NOW courier: Mayor Pro Tem Robert Essertier Council Member Robert Benz Council Member Sam Y. Edgerton Council Member Albert Wiemans Michael Schubach, Planning Director Christine Ketz, Chairperson of Planning Commission Joseph Di Monda, Planning Commission Robert Marks, Planning Commission Rod Merl, Planning Commission Steven Suard, Planning Commission Buchalter, Nemer, Fields & Younger (A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION) SUITE 2500 601 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET Los ANGELES, CA 90017-5704 Arthur Mazirow f j FEB 251992 b. I City Clerk \,S.3:1_,\, City of Hermosa Beach /4',./ Elaine Dorfling, City Clerk ARTHUR MAZIROW 2918 THE STRAND • HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254-2036 • (310) 376-6690 • FAX (310) 376-2650 February 25, 1992 Mayor Kathleen Midstokke City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 By NOW Courier Re: Proposal to Adopt a Resolution of Intent to Initiate a General Plan Amendment to the Circulation Element Regarding the Location of the Coastal Bicycle Route Dear Mayor Midstokke and Members of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach: The purpose of this letter is to advise you that I am opposed to the proposal to change the present bicycle circulation, route from Hermosa Avenue, between 24th Street and 35th Street (which I will refer to as the "Existing Route"), to the Strand between 24th Street and 35th Street (which I will refer to as the "Proposed Route"). The reasons for my opposition to the proposed change are as follows: 1. Safety a. The proposal to change the route seems to assume that the Existing Route is not used by bicyclists and that the Proposed Route is underutilized. Neither assumption is correct. They are not correct because of the following facts: (1) The Existing Route is used extensively by bicyclists going both in a northerly and southerly direction and it is very crowded, particularly on sunny Saturday and Sunday afternoons. However, based upon my observation, it is not used to any significant extent by walkers, joggers, baby carriage pushers, dog walkers, roller skaters, roller bladers, and skate boarders. Those persons do not use the Existing Route because of the narrowness of the Existing Route and the volume of the bicycle traffic. That fact makes the Existing Route unique to bicycle riding in the City of Hermosa Beach in that the Existing Route is almost exclusively used by bicyclists and not others. (2) The Proposed Route is used extensively by walkers, joggers, baby carriage pushers, dog walkers, roller skaters, roller bladers, skate boarders and bicyclists. The assumption that the Proposed Route is underutilized is just not accurate. It is as extensively used as any other part of the Strand except for those portions of the Strand adjacent to Pier Avenue. b. The City is well aware of the dangerous situation on the Strand created by the hazards of the walkers, joggers, baby carriage pushers, dog walkers, roller skaters, roller bladers, skate boarders and bicyclists all using the Strand. In order to reduce that danger the City has: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION_ 1' (1) Placed flashing yellow lights adjacent to Pier Avenue which require bicyclists to dismount from their bicycles; (2) Placed speed limits on bicyclists using the Strand; (3) procedures; Placed cautionary signs on the Strand regarding safe biking (4) Removed all benches from the Strand (with the exemption of two) so as to reduce the hazards of Strand use. c. If the Proposed Route is adopted by the City Council, the result will be an increase of bicyclists on the Proposed Route with the attendant dangers that the City is so aware. It is not as if the Proposed Route is not utilized by bicyclists because it is clearly used extensively for that purpose. All that would be accomplished by closing the Existing Route will be to compress two bicycle routes into one route. The people who normally use the Strand will continue to do so. d. The Existing Route is the entryway to our city from the north and the exit from our city. Bicyclists use the Existing Route because it is convenient, faster and safer than using the Proposed Route. They could, at this time, use the Proposed Route and they do. However, they can only do so if they dismount from their bicycles and carry the bicycles down the stairs or up the stairs at 35th Street. e. The original notice given by the City Clerk of the hearing before the City Council on January 28, 1992 concerned only the repair of the Existing Route and the alignment of the Existing Route with the bicycle path of Manhattan Beach that starts at the common boundary line between Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach. That proposal made a lot of sense. The Existing Route is so successful in reducing the bicycle traffic on the Strand that perhaps the City Council should give consideration to an extension of the Existing Route to the south boundary line of the City. 2. The Existing Route is the old Red Car route. Before the City terminates the Existing Route as a bike path, the status of the title should be examined to determine if the City is in danger of losing the title to the Existing Route by reason of some restriction in the deed. That type of restriction is not unusual. 3. Because of the compressing of two bicycle paths into one, if the proposed change is adopted, the City will probably have to retain a consultant to prepare an environmental impact report to evaluate the impact of the closing of the Existing Route because there will certainly be an increase in bicycle traffic on the Strand. 4. Assuming that the proposal to close down the Existing Route is adopted by the City Council, what will the City do with that abandoned route? This assumes the City retains control and ownership over it even though it is no longer used as a bike path. I have heard mentioned that if the Existing Route was abandoned then the City should consider the complete realignment of Hermosa Avenue to permit diagonal parking. Diagonal parking will have, in my view, the following impact: a. There will be a significant dollar cost to the City to realign Hermosa Avenue so as to eliminate the existing median strip that exists between 26th Street and 35th Street on Hermosa Avenue as well as a realignment of the existing lighting, grading of the street as well as all Mayor Kathleen Midstokke February 25, 1992 Page 3 incidental items that have to be accomplished when a street is adjusted. I do not know what the cost will be, but in all probability it will be substantial. b. The homes that are on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, facing Hermosa Avenue, will now be adjacent to a parking lot. I suspect that the situation will be very similar to the El Porto parking lot in Manhattan Beach. This will result in reduction in value of the homes facing Hermosa Avenue with a reduction in property tax revenue from those homes. 5. Availability of County Money. I understand that one of the prime reasons for the proposed change of bicycle route is the availability of County money. Since all decisions of governing bodies involve the balancing of various factors, it seems clear to me that the dangers that result from compressing two bicycle paths into one with the resulting loss of safety for the citizens of the City of Hermosa Beach and its visitors and the increased liability of the City for such accidents outweighs the value of receiving "free money" for improvement of the Strand along the Proposed Route. If the City Council really wants to improve the Proposed Route, it has been my experience that governing bodies generally will find resources to do that which they really want to do. Paragraph B of Proposed Resolution 92 that is being presented to the City Council this evening states as follows: "Changing the route to exclusively along the Strand should be considered for the purposes of improving circulation; improving the scenic qualities of the bike route; providing a better connection to the bike route in Manhattan Beach; and to eliminate hazards created by the conflict between bicycles and cars along Hermosa Avenue;" Breaking down Paragraph B into its component concepts, my comments concerning each of them are the following: 1. "Improving Circulation": It does not appear to me that the compressing of two bicycle routes into one is going to result in improving circulation unless the volume of users is reduced, which obviously is not likely. The original proposal of the Planning Department was to extend the Manhattan Beach bike path onto the Existing Route. That extension could be in a straight line because both the Manhattan Beach bicycle path and the Hermosa Beach Existing Route are the old Red Car right-of-way that are merely separated by approximately one hundred feet of sand and concrete barrier. If the purpose is to improve circulation, the extension of the Manhattan Beach bicycle path onto the Hermosa Beach Existing Route is the most logical because it is a straight connection. Any other circulation plan will require a significant jog in the bike path from where it ends in Manhattan Beach onto the Strand in Hermosa Beach. I estimate that the Strand in Hermosa Beach is approximately ninety feet west of the Manhattan Beach bike path. 2. "Improving the scenic qualities of the bike route": It is hard to argue with that statement, however, it must be kept in mind that the Existing Route is used by large numbers of Mayor Kathleen Midstokke February 25, 1992 Page 4 bicyclists every day of the week and particularly on Saturday and Sunday and they are consciously making the decision that they would rather use the Existing Route than the Proposed Route because of convenience and safety. 3. "Providing a better connection to the bike route in Manhattan Beach": As stated earlier, in order to connect up the Manhattan Beach bike path with the Proposed Route will require a significant jog of the bike path onto the sand in order to connect up with the Strand. The better connection is merely to extend the Existing Route to connect up on a straight line with the Manhattan Beach bike path, which of course was the original plan. 4. "To eliminate hazards created by the conflict between bicycles and cars along Hermosa Avenue": At 35th Street there is no conflict because cars do not bisect the Existing Route. There are two other automobile intersections with the Existing Route at Longfellow Avenue and 28th Street, but those intersections through the Existing Route are predominantly used by residents of the Strand who are well aware of the dangers and the need to be extraordinarily careful when crossing the Existing Route. At the southerly end of the Existing Route there is some conflict, however, there was a small barrier on the street to protect bicyclists but it was recently removed. I am sure that there are alternatives to solving the automobile traffic at the south end, however, I have no expertise in that area. In conclusion, I believe that after taking all of the factors above mentioned into consideration, that the City Council should not change the Existing Route. Very trul ,, ours, Arthur . irow AM: me cc by NOW courier: Mayor Pro Tem Robert Essertier Council Member Robert Benz Council Member Sam Y. Edgerton Council Member Albert Wiemans Michael Schubach, Planning Director Christine Ketz, Chairperson of Planning Commission Joseph Di Monda, Planning Commission Robert Marks, Planning Commission Rod Merl, Planning Commission Steven Suard, Planning Commission _a/25/9 RkQUEST TO KILL THE RE-ROUTING OF THE BIKE PATH • THE UNDERSIGNED ARE OWNER/RESIDENTS ON THE STRAND BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET IN HERMOSA BEACH. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO INITIATE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE-ROUTE THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE STRAND, AS SET FORTH IN CONSENT ITEM 1(J) ON CALENDAR FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 1992. WE SUPPORT THE STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION OF THE LETTER OF BRIAN AND ROSEMARY O'MALLEY DIRECTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1992. WHEREAS WE DESIRE TO HAVE THE STRAND REPAIRED, WE OPPOSE THE REPAIR IF IT REQUIRES ROUTING THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE NORTHERN STRETCH OF THE STRAND, THE REASONS FOR OPPOSITION ARE RECORDED IN THE HISTORY OF THE AREA AND ARE TOUCHED UPON BY THE COMMENTS OF THE LETTER. THE CITY COUNCIL IS HEREBY REQUESTED TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF WITHOUT DIRECTION. THE INTERESTS OF THE CITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE AREA INVOLVED ARE SERVED BY GRANTING THIS REQUEST. [THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE SIGNED IN COUNTER- PART.] NAME _/-44-az& ADDRESS C -f --V. (S (L �� _ a �av `1-0 ylNC 1,4tJ .l/(e � D Vjua Sr )c 3xcrif.tzSivam SIGNATURE 7N. _7W-dt„, z_&.Lekz-- To: The City Council of Hermosa Beach Date: February 24, 1992 Subject: Bikepath and Strand Changes North of 24th Street We have just canvassed 30 of our neighboring households, and 29 of us agree on the following: Public safety, as imperiled by bicycle accidents is best improved (and most inexpensively) by maintaining and encouraging more use of the existing bike path on Hermosa Avenue. The Manhattan bike path should definitely be connected to the Hermosa Avenue bike path to encourage its continual use. A new ramp to encourage entry from Manhattan to the Strand by bikes should not be installed. We who live near and look at the Strand everyday would rather have no improvements to the Strand near term, than to risk losing the most effective reducer of Strand bike traffic, the Hermosa Avenue bike path. We are the ones who see the heart -stopping near -misses between bikes and toddlers and senior citizens on a daily basis. Blood on the Strand from elderly and very young pedestrians hit by bikes is far uglier than an unmodernized Strand fence. All bicycle traffic, or at least bicycles capable of high speeds, should be banned from the Strand where the Hermosa Avenue bike path already exists. And, this ban should be enforced in a high profile manner. Those who suggest converting the existing Hermosa Avenue bike path to additional parking stalls are actually trading public safety (each additional bike on the Strand concentrates the accident risk), peace and quiet (more noise, crime and need for police calls), and a wonderful beach which all Hermosans can be proud of and feel safe walking along for a fictitious need: more parking. This area does not need more parking. Each night of last week, there were an average of 12 parking spaces available within one block radius of my residence. The above recommended approach to safe enjoyment of the beach and Strand by all Hermosa citizens is the lowest cost solution. Let's use what we already have: Minimize new spending. All Hermosans want to have a beach one can relax at and enjoy. No matter what part of town you're from, you can't relax if you have to fear for your life.when you get there, or if the final destination is so noisy and crowded, the experience is ruined for all, and especially for the toddlers and senior citizens. Sincerely yours, Brian and Rosemary O'Malley 3330 The Strand p. 2 Council P.S. The hazard at 35th Street and the Hermosa Avenue bike path complained about by two North Hermosa Strand residents is due to a visual obstruction caused by bikes too close to a building and traveling too fast. When the new connection is built between Manhattan's bike path and our Hermosa Avenue bike path, both problems can be designed out and eliminated. : • n. , REQUEST TO KILL THE RE-ROUTING OF THE BIKE PATH THE UNDERSIGNED ARE OWNER/RESIDENTS ON THE STRAND BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET IN HERMOSA BEACH. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO INITIATE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE-ROUTE THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE STRAND, AS SET FORTH IN CONSENT ITEM 1(J) ON CALENDAR FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 1992. WE SUPPORT THE STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION OF THE LETTER OF BRIAN AND ROSEMARY O'MALLEY DIRECTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1992. WHEREAS WE DESIRE TO HAVE THE STRAND REPAIRED, WE OPPOSE THE REPAIR IF IT REQUIRES ROUTING THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE NORTHERN STRETCH OF THE STRAND, THE REASONS FOR OPPOSITION ARE RECORDED IN THE HISTORY OF THE AREA AND ARE TOUCHED UPON BY THE COMMENTS OF THE LETTER. THE CITY COUNCIL IS HEREBY REQUESTED TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF WITHOUT DIRECTION. THE INTERESTS OF THE CITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE AREA INVOLVED ARE SERVED BY GRANTING THIS REQUEST. [THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE SIGNED IN COUNTER- PART.] NAME ADDRESS -- R GILL _a 57 -MIL Stray .1\ ciN bI51.1.1\AL:111gbu ct, 2y0 gf/7/VD SIGNATURE n ///E7y.eze- 2440- %lie fresh Joh LEJce b�a 74.94,0 To: The City Council of Hermosa Beach Date: February 24, 1992 Subject: Bikepath and Strand Changes North of 24th Street We have just canvassed 30 of our neighboring households, and 29 of us agree on the following: Public safety, as imperiled by bicycle accidents is best improved (and most inexpensively) by maintaining and encouraging more use of the existing bike path on Hermosa Avenue. The Manhattan bike path should definitely be connected to the Hermosa Avenue bike path to encourage its continual use. A new ramp to encourage entry from Manhattan to the Strand by bikes should not be installed. We who live near and look at the Strand everyday would rather have no improvements to the Strand near term, than to risk losing the most effective reducer of Strand bike traff c, the Hermosa Avenue bike path. We are the ones who see the heart-stoppng near -misses between bikes and toddlers and senior citizens on a daily basis. Blood on the Strand from elderly and very young pedestrians hit by bikes is far uglier than an unmodernized Strand fence. All bicycle traffic, or at least bicycles capable of high speeds, should be banned from the Strand where the Hermosa Avenue bike path already exists. And, this ban should be enforced in a high profile manner. Those who suggest converting the existing Hermosa Avenue bike path to additional parking stalls are actually trading public safety (each additional bike on the Strand concentrates the accident risk), peace and quiet (more noise, crime and need for police calls), and a wonderful beach which all Hermosans can be proud of and feel ,safe walking along for a fictitious need: more parking. This area does not need more parking. Each night of last week, there were an average of 12 parking spaces available within one block radius of my residence. The above recommended approach to safe enjoyment of the beach and Strand by all Hermosa citizens is the lowest cost solution. Let's use what we already have: Minimize new spending. All Hermosans want to have a beach one can relax at and enjoy. No matter what part of town you're from, you can't relax if you have to fear for your life.when you get there, or if the final destination is so noisy and crowded, the experience is ruined for all, and especially for the toddlers and senior citizens. Sincerely yours, Brian and Rosemary O'Malley 3330 The Strand p. 2 Council P.S. The hazard at 35th Street and the Hermosa Avenue bike path complained about by two North Hermosa Strand residents is due to a visual obstruction caused by bikes too close to a building and traveling too fast. When the new connection is built between Manhattan's bike path and our Hermosa Avenue bike path. both problems can be designed out and eliminated. REQUEST TO KILL THE RE-ROUTING OF THE BIKE PATH THE UNDERSIGNED ARE OWNER/RESIDENTS ON THE STRAND BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET IN HERMOSA BEACH. WE STRONGLYOPPOSE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO INITIATE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE-ROUTE THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE STRAND, AS SET FORTH IN CONSENT ITEM 1(J) ON CALENDAR FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 1992. WE SUPPORT THE STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION OF THE LETTER OF BRIAN AND ROSEMARY O'MALLEY DIRECTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1992. WHEREAS WE DESIRE TO HAVE THE STRAND REPAIRED, WE OPPOSE THE REPAIR IF IT REQUIRES ROUTING THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE NORTHERN STRETCH OF THE STRAND, THE REASONS FOR OPPOSITION ARE RECORDED IN THE HISTORY OF THE AREA AND ARE TOUCHED UPON BY THE COMMENTS OF THE LETTER. THE CITY COUNCIL IS HEREBY REQUESTED TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF WITHOUT DIRECTION. THE INTERESTS OF THE CITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE AREA INVOLVED ARE SERVED BY GRANTING THIS REQUEST. [THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE SIGNED IN COUNTER- PART.] NAME ADDRESS c.S2z1-lah 32ZL Strad 333 444 Oki-tt( 1,1r/t( .3)2,1 _SVAte To: The City Council of Hermosa Beach Date: February 24, 1992 Subject: Bikepath and Strand Changes North of 24th Street We have just canvassed 30 of our neighboring households, and 29 of us agree on the following: Public safety, as imperiled by bicycle accidents is best improved (and most inexpensively) by maintaining and encouraging more use of the existing bike path on Hermosa Avenue. The Manhattan bike path should definitely be connected to the Hermosa Avenue bike path to encourage its continual use. A new ramp to encourage entry from Manhattan to the Strand by bikes should not be installed. We who live near and look at the Strand everyday would rather have no improvements to the Strand near term, than to risk losing the most effective reducer of Strand bike traffic, the Hermosa Avenue bike path. We are the ones who see the heart -stopping near -misses between bikes and toddlers and senior citizens on a daily basis. Blood on the Strand from elderly and very young pedestrians hit by bikes is far uglier than an unmodernized Strand fence. All bicycle traffic, or at least bicycles capable of high speeds, should be banned from the Strand where the Hermosa Avenue bike path already exists. And, this ban should be enforced in a high profile manner. Those who suggest converting the existing Hermosa Avenue bike path to additional parking stalls are actually trading public safety (each additional bike on the Strand concentrates the accident risk), peace and quiet (more noise, crime and need for police calls), and a wonderful beach which all Hermosans can be proud of and feel safe walking along for a fictitious need: more parking. This area does not need more parking. Each night of last week, there were an average of 12 parking spaces available within one block radius of my residence. The above recommended approach to safe enjoyment of the beach and Strand by all Hermosa citizens is the lowest cost solution. Let's use what we already have: Minimize new spending. All Hermosans want to have a beach one can relax at and enjoy. No matter what part of town you're from, you can't relax if you have to fear for your life when you get there, or if the final destination is so noisy and crowded, the experience is ruined for all, and especially for the toddlers and senior citizens. Sincerely yours, Brian and Rosemary O'Malley 3330 The Strand p. 2 Council P.S. The hazard at 35th Street and the Hermosa Avenue bike path complained about by two North Hermosa Strand residents is due to a visual obstruction caused by bikes too close to a building and traveling too fast. When the new connection is built between Manhattan's bike path and our Hermosa Avenue bike path, both problems can be designed out and eliminated. REQUEST TO KILL THE RE-ROUTING OF THE BIKE PATH THE UNDERSIGNED ARE OWNER/RESIDENTS ON THE STRAND BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET IN HERMOSA BEACH. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO INITIATE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE-ROUTE THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE STRAND, AS SET FORTH IN CONSENT ITEM 1(J) ON CALENDAR FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 1992. WE SUPPORT THE STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION OF THE LETTER OF BRIAN AND ROSEMARY O'MALLEY DIRECTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1992. WHEREAS WE DESIRE TO HAVE THE STRAND REPAIRED, WE OPPOSE THE REPAIR IF IT REQUIRES ROUTING THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE NORTHERN STRETCH OF THE STRAND, THE REASONS FOR OPPOSITION ARE RECORDED IN THE HISTORY OF THE AREA AND ARE TOUCHED UPON BY THE COMMENTS OF THE LETTER. THE CITY COUNCIL IS HEREBY REQUESTED TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF WITHOUT DIRECTION. THE INTERESTS OF THE CITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE AREA INVOLVED ARE SERVED BY GRANTING THIS REQUEST. [THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE SIGNED IN COUNTER- PART.] NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE E12_1 idoct- AN 'W(0 Eo1 osil AY C zz_5:100 75tiA-f-f � To: The City Council of Hermosa Beach Date: February 24, 1992 Subject: Bikepath and Strand Changes North of 24th Street We have just canvassed 30 of our neighboring households, and 29 of us agree on the following: Public safety, as imperiled by bicycle accidents is best improved (and most inexpensively) by maintaining and encouraging more use of the existing bike path on Hermosa Avenue. The Manhattan bike path should definitely be connected to the Hermosa Avenue bike path to encourage its continual use. A new ramp to encourage entry from Manhattan to the Strand by bikes should not be installed. We who live near and look at the Strand everyday would rather have no improvements to the Strand near term, than to risk losing the most effective reducer of Strand bike traffic, the Hermosa Avenue bike path. We are the ones who see the hea rt -stopping near -misses between bikes and toddlers and senior citizens on a daily basis. Blood on the Strand from elderly and very young pedestrians hit by bikes is far uglier than an unmodernized Strand fence. All bicycle traffic, or at least bicycles capable of high speeds, should be banned from the Strand where the Hermosa Avenue bike path already exists. And, this ban should be enforced in a high profile manner. Those who suggest converting the existing Hermosa Avenue bike path to additional parking stalls are actually trading public safety (each additional bike on the Strand concentrates the accident risk), peace and quiet (more noise, crime and need for police calls), and a wonderful beach which all Hermosans can be proud of and feel safe walking along for a fictitious need: more parking. This area does not need more parking. Each night of last week, there were an average of 12 parking spaces available within one block radius of my residence. The above recommended approach to safe enjoyment of the beach and Strand by all Hermosa citizens is the „lowest cost solution. Let's use what we already have: Minimize new spending. All Hermosans want to have a beach one can relax at and enjoy. No matter what part of town you're from, you can't relax if you have to fear for your life.when you get there, or if the final destination is so noisy and crowded, the experience is ruined for all, and especially for the toddlers and senior citizens. Sincerely yours, Brian and Rosemary O'Malley 3330 The Strand p. 2 Council P.S. The hazard at 35th Street and the Hermosa Avenue bike path complained about by two North Hermosa Strand residents is due to a visual obstruction caused by bikes too close to a building and traveling too fast. When the new connection is built between Manhattan's bike path and our Hermosa Avenue bike path, both problems can be designed out and eliminated. REQUEST TO KILL THE RE-ROUTING OF THE BIKE PATH THE UNDERSIGNED ARE OWNER/RESIDENTS ON THE STRAND BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET IN HERMOSA BEACH. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO INITIATE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE-ROUTE THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE STRAND, AS SET FORTH IN CONSENT ITEM 1(J) ON CALENDAR FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 1992. WE SUPPORT THE STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION OF THE LETTER OF BRIAN AND ROSEMARY O'MALLEY DIRECTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1992. WHEREAS WE DESIRE TO HAVE THE STRAND REPAIRED, WE OPPOSE THE REPAIR IF IT REQUIRES ROUTING THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE NORTHERN STRETCH OF THE STRAND, THE REASONS FOR OPPOSITION ARE RECORDED IN THE HISTORY OF THE AREA AND ARE TOUCHED UPON BY THE COMMENTS OF THE LETTER. THE CITY COUNCIL IS HEREBY REQUESTED TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF WITHOUT DIRECTION. THE INTERESTS OF THE CITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE AREA INVOLVED ARE SERVED BY GRANTING THIS REQUEST. [THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE SIGNED IN COUNTER- PART.] NAME C• w • &en cies' ADDRESS VI -927-e-, &-W. a 7 - kP±-..)=2‘e 5)4e4to « 02131 STRAD 2831 TT4 S7R14ND SIGNATURE aim jw awl zit Mad& 3t/7J-k,2 6111. &X 2,5/70/14 Jca { / c u m' To: The City Council of Hermosa Beach Date: February 24, 1992 Subject: Bikepath and Strand Changes North of 24th Street We have just canvassed 30 of our neighboring households, and 29 of us agree on the following: Public safety, as imperiled by bicycle accidents is best improved (and most inexpensively) by maintaining and encouraging more use of the existing bike path on Hermosa Avenue. The Manhattan bike path should definitely be connected to the Hermosa Avenue bike path to encourage its continual use. A new ramp to encourage entry from Manhattan to the Strand by bikes should not be installed. We who live near and look at the Strand everyday would rather have no improvements to the Strand near term, than to risk losing the most effective reducer of Strand bike traffi , the Hermosa Avenue bike path. We are the ones who see the heart -stopping near -misses between bikes and toddlers and senior citizens on a daily basis. Blood on the Strand from elderly and very young pedestrians hit by bikes is far uglier than an unmodernized Strand fence. All bicycle traffic, or at least bicycles capable of high speeds, should be banned from the Strand where the Hermosa Avenue bike path already exists. And, this ban should be enforced in a high profile manner. Those who suggest converting the existing Hermosa Avenue bike path to additional parking stalls are actually trading public safety (each additional bike on the Strand concentrates the accident risk), peace and quiet (more noise, crime and need for police calls), and a wonderful beach which all Hermosans can be proud of and feel safe walking along for a fictitious need: more parking. This area does not need more parking. Each night of last week, there were an average of 12 parking spaces available within one block radius of my residence. The above recommended approach to safe enjoyment of the beach and Strand by all Hermosa citizens is the „lowest cost solution. Let's use what we already have; Minimize new spending. All Hermosans want to have a beach one can relax at and enjoy. No matter what part of town you're from, you can't relax if you have to fear for your life when you get there, or if the final destination is so noisy and crowded, the experience is ruined for all, and especially for the toddlers and senior citizens. Sincerely yours, Brian and Rosemary O'Malley 3330 The Strand p. 2 Council P.S. The hazard at 35th Street and the Hermosa Avenue bike path complained about by two North Hermosa Strand residents is due to a visual obstruction caused by bikes too close to a building and traveling too fast. When the new connection is built between Manhattan's bike path and our Hermosa Avenue bike path, both problems can be designed out and eliminated. REQUEST TO KILL THE RE-ROUTING OF THE BIKE 'PATH THE UNDERSIGNED ARE OWNER/RESIDENTS 0111111111111EMMIP BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET IN HERMOSA BEACH. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO INITIATE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE-ROUTE THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE STRAND, AS SET FORTH IN CONSENT ITEM 1(J) ON CALENDAR FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 1992. WE SUPPORT THE STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION OF THE LETTER OF BRIAN AND ROSEMARY O'MALLEY DIRECTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1992.A WHEREAS WE DESIRE TO HAVE THE STRAND REPAIRED, WE OPPOSE THE REPAIR IF IT REQUI-RES ROUTING THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE NORTHERN STRETCH OF THE STRAND, THE REASONS FOR OPPOSITION ARE RECORDED IN THE HISTORY OF THE AREA AND ARE TOUCHED UPON BY THE COMMENTS OF THE LETTER. THE CITY COUNCIL IS HEREBY REQUESTED TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF WITHOUT DIRECTION. THE INTERESTS OF THE CITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE AREA INVOLVED ARE SERVED BY GRANTING THIS REQUEST. [THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE SIGNED IN COUNTER- PART.] NAME 8/2/74)Cy/lid/6 5 ADDRESS SIGNATURE 33,1 Sit.4-4c1 Uel--( S 4 S -"1 ivtvPs�m1�„ tJ To: The City Council of Hermosa Beach Date: February 24, 1992 Subject: Bikepath and Strand Changes North of 24th Street We have just canvassed 30 of our neighboring households, and 29 of us agree on the following: Public safety, as imperiled by bicycle accidents is best improved (and most inexpensively) by maintaining and encouraging more use of the existing bike path on Hermosa Avenue. The Manhattan bike path should definitely be connected to the Hermosa Avenue bike path to encourage its continual use. A new ramp to encourage entry from Manhattan to the Strand by bikes should not be installed. We who live near and look at the Strand everyday would rather have no improvements to the Strand near term, than to risk losing the most effective reducer of Strand bike traffic, the Hermosa Avenue bike path. We are the ones who see the heart-stopp ni g near -misses between bikes and toddlers and senior citizens on a daily basis. Blood on the Strand from elderly and very young pedestrians hit by bikes is far uglier than an unmodernized Strand fence. All bicycle traffic, or at least bicycles capable of high speeds, should be banned from the Strand where the Hermosa Avenue bike path already exists. And, this ban should be enforced in a high profile manner. Those who suggest converting the existing Hermosa Avenue bike path to additional parking stalls are actually trading public safety (each additional bike on the Strand concentrates the accident risk), peace and quiet (more noise, crime and need for police calls), and a wonderful beach which all Hermosans can be proud of and feel safe walking along for a fictitious need: more parking. This area does not need more parking. Each night of last week, there were an average of 12 parking spaces available within one block radius of my residence. The above recommended approach to safe enjoyment of the beach and Strand by all Hermosa citizens is the lowest cost solution. Let's use what we already have: Minimize new spending. All Hermosans want to have a beach one can relax at and enjoy. No matter what part of town you're from, you can't relax if you have to fear for your life.when you get there, or if the final destination is so noisy and crowded, the experience is ruined for all, and especially for the toddlers and senior citizens. Sincerely yours, Brian and Rosemary O'Malley 3330 The Strand p. 2 Council P.S. The hazard at 35th Street and the Hermosa Avenue bike path complained about by two North Hermosa Strand residents is due to a visual obstruction caused by bikes too close to a building and traveling too fast. When the new connection is built between Manhattan's bike path and our Hermosa Avenue bike path, both problems can be designed out and eliminated. •r REQUEST TO KILL THE RE-ROUTING OF THE BIKE PATH THE UNDERSIGNED ARE OWNER/RESIDENTS ON THE STRAND BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET IN HERMOSA BEACH. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO INITIATE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE-ROUTE THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE STRAND, AS SET FORTH IN CONSENT ITEM 1(J) ON CALENDAR FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 1992. WE SUPPORT THE STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION OF THE LETTER OF BRIAN AND ROSEMARY O'MALLEY DIRECTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1992. WHEREAS WE DESIRE TO HAVE THE STRAND REPAIRED, WE OPPOSE THE REPAIR IF IT REQUIRES ROUTING THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE NORTHERN STRETCH OF THE STRAND, THE REASONS FOR OPPOSITION ARE RECORDED IN THE HISTORY OF THE AREA AND ARE TOUCHED UPON BY THE COMMENTS OF THE LETTER. THE CITY COUNCIL IS HEREBY REQUESTED TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF WITHOUT DIRECTION. THE INTERESTS OF THE CITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE AREA INVOLVED ARE SERVED BY GRANTING THIS REQUEST. [THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE SIGNED IN COUNTER- PART.] NAME ADDRESS VILNA HASTINGS 2721 HERMOSA AVENUE PHILLIP A. HASTINGS 2721 HERMOSA AVENUE Rose��n S )74 7. 33o X5172/9,10 /) 1 ti.) B . d ��A CL 1 .s3 3 o C17 e STr ki) 7k_l_ Z.Likekc2.2.Q.2.7e.A/ 2j'i'i To: The City Council of Hermosa Beach Date: February 24, 1992 Subject: Bikepath and Strand Changes North of 24th Street We have just canvassed 30 of our neighboring households, and 29 of us agree on the following: Public safety, as imperiled by bicycle accidents is best improved (and most inexpensively) by maintaining and encouraging more use of the existing bike path on Hermosa ld d Avenue. The Manhattan bike path shouefinitely be connected to the Hermosa Avenue bike path to encourage its continual use. A new ramp to encourage entry from Manhattan to the Strand by bikes should not be installed. We who live near and look at the Strand everyday would rather have no improvements to the Strand near term, than to risk losing the most effective reducer of Strand bike traffic, the Hermosa Avenue bike Vath. We are the ones who see the heart -stopping near -misses between bikes and toddlers and senior citizens on a daily basis. Blood on the Strand from elderly and very young pedestrians hit by bikes is far uglier than an unmodernized Strand fence. All bicycle traffic, or at least bicycles capable of high speeds, should be banned from the Strand where the Hermosa Avenue bike path already exists. And, this ban should be enforced in a high profile manner. Those who suggest converting the existing Hermosa Avenue bike path to additional parking stalls are actually trading public safety (each additional bike on the Strand concentrates the accident risk), peace and quiet (more noise, crime and need for police calls), and a wonderful beach which all Hermosans can be proud of and feel safe walking along for a fictitious need: more parking. This area does not need more parking. Each night of last week, there were an average of 12 parking spaces available within one block radius of my residence. The above recommended approach to safe enjoyment of the beach and Strand by all Hermosa citizens is the lowest cost solution. Let's use what we already have: Minimize new spending. All Hermosans want to have a beach one can relax at and enjoy. No matter what part of town you're from, you can't relax if you have to fear for your life.when you get there, or if the final destination is so noisy and crowded, the experience is ruined for all, and especially for the toddlers and senior citizens. Sincerely yours, Brian and Rosemary O'Malley 3330 The Strand p. 2 Council P.S. The hazard at 35th Street and the Hermosa Avenue bike path complained about by two North Hermosa Strand residents is due to a visual obstruction caused by bikes too close to a building and traveling too fast. When the new connection is built between Manhattan's bike path and our Hermosa Avenue bike path, both problems can be designed out and eliminated. REQUEST TO KILL THE RE-ROUTING OF THE BIKE PATH THE UNDERSIGNED ARE OWNER/RESIDENTS ON THE STRAND BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET IN HERMOSA BEACH. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO INITIATE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE-ROUTE THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE STRAND, AS SET FORTH IN CONSENT ITEM 1(J) ON CALENDAR FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 1992. WE SUPPORT THE STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION OF THE LETTER OF BRIAN AND ROSEMARY O'MALLEY DIRECTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1992. WHEREAS WE DESIRE TO HAVE THE STRAND REPAIRED, WE OPPOSE THE REPAIR IF IT REQUIRES ROUTING THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE NORTHERN STRETCH OF THE STRAND, THE REASONS FOR OPPOSITION ARE RECORDED IN THE HISTORY OF THE AREA AND ARE TOUCHED UPON BY THE COMMENTS OF THE LETTER. THE CITY COUNCIL IS HEREBY REQUESTED TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF WITHOUT DIRECTION. THE INTERESTS OF THE CITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE AREA INVOLVED ARE SERVED BY GRANTING THIS REQUEST. [THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE SIGNED IN COUNTER- PART.] NAME ADDRESS EAJ �l /��-7'<ic.a 32 71 Z3 574/24.10 '12 Stfze&D SIGNATURE .--- Qom- 21-1 D besm-d-o 0,_-11A.Q-s-f-roz4J '10(g' /.&w,c,dd 3zaS 1hPa �tr4_(2-7 ST,Qa,xe To: The City Council of Hermosa Beach Date: February 24, 1992 Subject: Bikepath and Strand Changes North of 24th Street We have just canvassed 30 of our neighboring households, and 29 of us agree on the following: Public safet , as imperiled by bicycle accidents is best improved and most inexpensively) by maintaining and encouraging more use of the existing bike path on Hermosa Avenue. The Manhattan bike path should definitely be connected to the Hermosa Avenue bike path to encourage its continual use. A new ramp to encourage entry from Manhattan to the Strand by bikes should not be installed. We who live near and look at the Strand everyday would rather have no improvements to the Strand near term, than to risk losing the most effective reducer of Strand bike traffs , the Hermosa Avenue bike path. We are the ones who see the heart -stopping -near -misses between bikes and toddlers and senior citizens on a daily basis. Blood on the Strand from elderly and very young pedestrians hit by bikes is far uglier than an unmodernized Strand fence. All bicycle traffic, or at least bicycles capable of high speeds, should be banned from the Strand where the Hermosa Avenue bike path already exists. And, this ban should be enforced in a high profile manner. Those who suggest converting the existing Hermosa Avenue bike path to additional parking stalls are actually trading public safety (each additional bike on the Strand concentrates the accident risk), peace and quiet (more noise, crime and need for police calls), and a wonderful beach which all Hermosans can be proud of and feel safe walking along for a fictitious need: more parking. This area does not need more parking. Each night of last week, there were an average of 12 parking spaces available within one block radius of my residence. The above recommended approach to safe enjoyment of the beach and Strand by all Hermosa citizens is the lowest cost solution. Let's use what we already have: Minimize new spending. All Hermosans want to have a beach one can relax at and enjoy. No matter what part of town you're from, you can't relax if you have to fear for your life.when you get there, or if the final destination is so noisy and crowded, the experience is ruined for all, and especially for the toddlers and senior citizens. Sincerely yours, Brian and Rosemary O'Malley 3330 The Strand p. 2 Council P.S. The hazard at 35th Street and the Hermosa Avenue bike path complained about by two North Hermosa Strand residents is due to a visual obstruction caused by bikes too close to a building and traveling too fast. When the new connection is built between Manhattan's bike path and our Hermosa Avenue bike path, both problems can be designed out and eliminated. REQUEST TO KILL THE RE-ROUTING OF THE BIKE PATH THE UNDERSIGNED ARE OWNER/RESIDENTS IMMUMMONli BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET IN HERMOSA BEACH. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO INITIATE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE-ROUTE THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE STRAND, AS SET FORTH IN CONSENT ITEM 1(J) ON CALENDAR FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 1992. WE SUPPORT THE STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION OF THE LETTER OF BRIAN AND ROSEMARY O'MALLEY DIRECTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1992. WHEREAS WE DESIRE TO HAVE THE STRAND REPAIRED, WE OPPOSE THE REPAIR IF IT REQUIRES ROUTING THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE NORTHERN STRETCH OF THE STRAND, THE REASONS FOR OPPOSITION ARE RECORDED IN THE HISTORY OF THE AREA AND ARE TOUCHED UPON BY THE COMMENTS OF THE LETTER. THE CITY COUNCIL IS HEREBY REQUESTED TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF WITHOUT DIRECTION. THE INTERESTS OF THE CITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE AREA INVOLVED ARE SERVED BY GRANTING THIS REQUEST. [THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE SIGNED IN COUNTER- PART.] NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE *DOS a-J/4wS6 813 kw Sr . I PcLnk2A), To: The City Council of Hermosa Beach Date: February 24, 1992 Subject: Bikepath and Strand Changes North of 24th Street We have just canvassed 30 of our neighboring households, and 29 of us agree on the following: Public safety, as imperiled by bicycle accidents is best imp ovr ed (and most inexpensively) by maintaining and encouraging more use of the existing bike path on Hermosa Avenue. The Manhattan bike path should definitely be connected to the Hermosa Avenue bike path to encourage its continual use. A new ramp to encourage entry from Manhattan to the Strand by bikes should not be installed. We who live near and look at the Strand everyday would rather have no improvements to the Strand near term, than to risk losing the most effective reducer of Strand bike traff c, the Hermosa Avenue bike Path. We are the ones who see the heart -stop near -misses between bikes and toddlers and senior citizens on a daily basis. Blood on the Strand from elderly and very young pedestrians hit by bikes is far uglier than an unmodernized Strand fence. All bicycle traffic, or at least bicycles capable of high speeds, should be banned from the Strand where the Hermosa Avenue bike path already exists. And, this ban should be enforced in a high profile manner. Those who suggest converting the existing Hermosa Avenue bike path to additional parking stalls are actually trading public safety (each additional bike on the Strand concentrates the accident risk), peace and quiet (more noise, crime and need for police calls), and a wonderful beach which all Hermosans can be proud of and feel safe walking along for a fictitious need: more parking. This area does not need more parking. Each night of last week, there were an average of 12 parking spaces available within one block radius of my residence. The above recommended approach to safe enjoyment of the beach and Strand by all Hermosa citizens is the lowest cost solution. Let's use what we already have: Minimize new spending. All Hermosans want to have a beach one can relax at and enjoy. No matter what part of town you're from, you can't relax if you have to fear for your life.when you get there, or if the final destination is so noisy and crowded, the experience is ruined for all, and especially for the toddlers and senior citizens. Sincerely yours, Brian and Rose ary O'Malley 3330 The Strand p. 2 Council P.S. The hazard at 35th Street and the Hermosa Avenue bike path complained about by two North Hermosa Strand residents is due to a visual obstruction caused by bikes too close to a building and traveling too fast. When the new connection is built between Manhattan's bike path and our Hermosa Avenue bike path, both problems can be designed out and eliminated. 'REQUEST TO KILL THE RE-ROUTING OF THE BIKE PATH THE UNDERSIGNED ARE OWNER/RESIDENTS ON THE STRAND BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET IN HERMOSA BEACH. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF. INTENT TO INITIATE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE-ROUTE THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE STRAND, AS SET FORTH IN CONSENT ITEM 1(J) ON CALENDAR FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 1992. WE SUPPORT THE STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION OF THE LETTER OF BRIAN AND ROSEMARY O'MALLEY DIRECTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1992. WHEREAS WE DESIRE TO HAVE THE STRAND REPAIRED, WE OPPOSE THE REPAIR IF IT REQUIRES ROUTING THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE NORTHERN STRETCH OF THE STRAND, THE REASONS FOR OPPOSITION ARE RECORDED IN THE HISTORY OF THE AREA AND ARE TOUCHED UPON BY THE COMMENTS OF THE LETTER. THE CITY COUNCIL IS HEREBY REQUESTED TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF WITHOUT DIRECTION. THE INTERESTS OF THE CITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE AREA INVOLVED ARE SERVED BY GRANTING THIS REQUEST. [THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE SIGNED IN COUNTER- PART.] NAME ADDRESS l�Jt F zfiet 61iky Llltj L e0.0.1 A g..Z6 ,a41)(it biQN:\g; a.. -N) J ►LL_ CuiTriN s7T4buo p i2��n�ac i2Witi )4" 3)z5gaa/o' SIGNATURE To: The City Council of Hermosa Beach Date: February 24, 1992 Subject: Bikepath and Strand Changes North of 24th Street We have just canvassed 30 of our neighboring households, and 29 of us agree on the following: Public safety, as imperiled by bicycle accidents is best improved (and most inexpensively) by maintaining and encouraging more use of the existing bike path on Hermosa Avenue. The Manhattan bike path should be connected to the Hermosa Avenue bike path to encourage its continual use. A new ramp to encourage, entry from Manhattan to the Strand by bikes should not be installed. We who live near and look at the Strand everyday would rather have no improvements to the Strand near term, than to risk losing the most effective reducer of Strand bike traffic, the Hermosa Avenue bike path. We are the ones who see the heart -stopping near -misses between bikes and toddlers and senior citizens on a daily basis. Blood on the Strand from elderly and very young pedestrians hit by bikes is far uglier than an unmodernized Strand fence. All bicycle traffic, or at least bicycles capable of high speeds, should be banned from the Strand where the Hermosa Avenue bike path already exists. And, this ban should be enforced in a high profile manner. Those who suggest converting the existing Hermosa Avenue bike path to additional parking stalls are actually trading public safety (each additional bike on the Strand concentrates the accident risk), peace and quiet (more noise, crime and need for police calls), and a wonderful beach which all Hermosans can be proud of and feel safe walking along for a fictitious need: more parking. This area does not need more parking. Each night of last week, there were an average of 12 parking spaces available within one block radius of my residence. The above recommended approach to safe enjoyment of the beach and Strand by all Hermosa citizens is the „lowest cost solution. Let's use what we already have: Minimize new spending. All Hermosans want to have a beach one can relax at and enjoy. No matter what part of town you're from, you can't relax if you have to fear for your life when you get there, or if the final destination is so noisy and crowded, the experience is ruined for all, and especially for the toddlers and senior citizens. Sincerely yours, Brian and Rosemary O'Malley 3330 The Strand p. 2 Council P.S. The hazard at 35th Street and the Hermosa Avenue bike path complained about by two North Hermosa Strand residents is due to a visual obstruction caused by bikes too close to a building and traveling too fast. When the new connection is built between Manhattan's bike path and our Hermosa Avenue bike path, both problems can be designed out and eliminated. J• 1,w REQUEST TO KILL THE RE-ROUTING OF THE BIKE PATH THE UNDERSIGNED ARE OWNER/RESIDENTS ON THE STRAND BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET IN HERMOSA BEACH. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO INITIATE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE-ROUTE THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE STRAND, AS SET FORTH IN CONSENT ITEM 1(J) ON CALENDAR FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 1992. WE SUPPORT THE STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION OF THE LETTER OF BRIAN AND ROSEMARY O'MALLEY DIRECTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1992. WHEREAS WE DESIRE TO HAVE THE STRAND REPAIRED, WE OPPOSE THE REPAIR IF IT REQUIRES ROUTING THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE NORTHERN STRETCH OF THE STRAND, THE REASONS FOR OPPOSITION ARE RECORDED IN THE HISTORY OF THE AREA AND ARE TOUCHED UPON BY THE COMMENTS OF THE LETTER. THE CITY COUNCIL IS HEREBY REQUESTED TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF WITHOUT DIRECTION. THE INTERESTS OF THE CITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE AREA INVOLVED ARE SERVED BY GRANTING THIS REQUEST. [THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE SIGNED IN COUNTER PART.] NAME IQfh4e5 (,R Sar.g_LcZO ADDRESS 3 2 3 r 54q4ji.fs 'ro-►� f, 1 SIGNATURE Air To: The City Council of Hermosa Beach Date: February 24, 1992 Subject: Bikepath and Strand Changes North of 24th Street We have just canvassed 30 of our neighboring households, and 29 of us agree on the following: Public safety, as imperiled by bicycle accidents is best improved (and most inexpensively) by maintaining and encouraging more use of the existing bike path on Hermosa Avenue. The Manhattan bike path should definitely be connected to the Hermosa Avenue bike path to encourage its continual use. A new ramp to encourage entry from Manhattan to the Strand by bikes should not be installed. We who live near and look at the Strand everyday would rather have no improvements to the Strand near term, than to risk losing the most effective reducer of Strand bike traff c, the Hermosa Avenue bike path. We are the ones who see the heart-stopp g near -misses between bikes and toddlers and senior citizens on a daily basis. Blood on the Strand from elderly and very young pedestrians hit by bikes is far uglier than an unmodernized Strand fence. All bicycle traffic, or at least bicycles capable of high speeds, should be banned from the Strand where the Hermosa Avenue bike path already exists. And, this ban should be enforced in a high profile manner. Those who suggest converting the existing Hermosa Avenue bike path to additional parking stalls are actually trading public safety (each additional bike on the Strand concentrates the accident risk), peace and quiet (more noise, crime and need for police calls), and a wonderful beach which all Hermosans can be proud of and feel safe walking along for a fictitious need: more parking. This area does not need more parking. Each night of last week, there were an average of 12 parking spaces available within one block radius of my residence. The above recommended approach to safe enjoyment of the beach and Strand by all Hermosa citizens is the i,owest cost solution. Let's use what we already have! Minimize new spending. All Hermosans want to have a beach one can+relax at and enjoy. No matter what part of town you're from, you can't relax if you have to fear for your life_when you get there, or if the final destination is so noisy and crowded, the experience is ruined for all, and especially for the toddlers and senior citizens. Sincerely yours, Brian and Rosemary O'Malley 3330 The Strand p. 2 Council P.S. The hazard at 35th Street and the Hermosa Avenue bike path complained about by two North Hermosa Strand residents is due to a visual obstruction caused by bikes too close to a building and traveling too fast. When the new connection is built between Manhattan's bike path and our Hermosa'Avenue bike path. both problems can be designed out and eliminated. REQUEST TO KILL THE RE-ROUTING OF THE BIKE PATH THE UNDERSIGNED ARE OWNER/RESIDENTS ON THE STRAND BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 35TH STREET IN HERMOSA BEACH. WE STRONGLY OPPOSE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO INITIATE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO RE-ROUTE THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE STRAND, AS SET FORTH IN CONSENT ITEM 1(J) ON CALENDAR FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 1992. WE SUPPORT THE STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION OF THE LETTER OF BRIAN AND ROSEMARY O'MALLEY DIRECTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1992. WHEREAS WE DESIRE TO HAVE THE STRAND REPAIRED, WE OPPOSE THE REPAIR IF IT REQUIRES ROUTING THE BIKE PATH ONTO THE NORTHERN STRETCH OF THE STRAND, THE REASONS FOR OPPOSITION ARE RECORDED IN THE HISTORY OF THE AREA AND ARE TOUCHED UPON BY THE COMMENTS OF THE LETTER. THE CITY COUNCIL IS HEREBY REQUESTED TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF WITHOUT DIRECTION. THE INTERESTS OF THE CITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE AREA INVOLVED ARE SERVED BY GRANTING THIS REQUEST. [THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE SIGNED IN COUNTER- PART.] NAME ADDRESS ATfi-es Q52/9AID 3107 frig zfe 1.&406/2tia3(33 r &tib SIGNATURE To: The City Council of Hermosa Beach Date: February 24, 1992 Subject: Bikepath and Strand Changes North of 24th Street We have just canvassed 30 of our neighboring households, and 29 of us agree on the following: Public safety, as imperiled by bicycle accidents is best improved (and most inexpensively) by maintaining and encouraging more use of the existing bike path on Hermosa Avenue. The Manhattan bike path should definitely be connected to the Hermosa Avenue bike path to encourage its continual use. A new ramp to encourage entry from Manhattan to the Strand by bikes should not be installed. We who live near and look at the Strand everyday would rather have no improvements to the Strand near term, than to risk losing the most effective reducer of Strand bike traffic, the Hermosa Avenue bike path. We are the ones who see the heart-stopp ni g near -misses between bikes and toddlers and senior citizens on a daily basis. Blood on the Strand from elderly and very young pedestrians hit by bikes is far uglier than an unmodernized Strand fence. All bicycle traffic, or at least bicycles capable of high speeds, should be banned from the Strand where the Hermosa Avenue bike path already exists. And, this ban should be enforced in a high profile manner. Those who suggest converting the existing Hermosa Avenue bike path to additional parking stalls are actually trading public safety (each additional bike on the Strand concentrates the accident risk), peace and quiet (more noise, crime and need for police calls), and a wonderful beach which all Hermosans can be proud of and feel safe walking along for a fictitious need: more parking. This area does not need more parking. Each night of last week, there were an average of 12 parking spaces available within one block radius of my residence. The above recommended approach to safe enjoyment of the beach and Strand by all Hermosa citizens is the i,owest cost solution. Let's use what we already have: Minimize new spending. All Hermosans want to have a beach one can relax at and enjoy. No matter what part of town you're from, you can't relaxif you have to fear for your life.when you get there, or if the final destination is so noisy and crowded, the experience is ruined for all, and especially for the toddlers and senior citizens. Sincerely yours, Brian and Rosemary O'Malley 3330 The Strand p. 2 Council P.S. The hazard at 35th Street and the Hermosa Avenue bike path r4c„ complained about by two North Hermosa Strand residents is due to a visual obstruction caused by bikes too close to a building and traveling too fast. When the new connection is built between Manhattan's bike path and our Hermosa Avenue bike path, both problems can be designed out and eliminated. February 18, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council 60 City Council Meeting of February 25, 1992 INFORMATIONAL REPORT REGARDING THE CURRENT PARKING ENFORCEMENT PRACTICES RELATED TO PARKING ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG BEACH DRIVE Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council receive and file this report. Background: At the regular Council meeting of February 11, 1992, Council requested a staff report regarding the current parking enforcement practices along Beach Drive with particular interest on the public right-of-way Analysis: In July 1990, the City received a letter of complaint from John and Susan McFarlane regarding the practice of private vehicles utilizing the public right-of-way along Beach Drive for parking. At the regular Council meeting of August 14, 1990, the matter was presented to City Council. Council approved staff recommendation to authorize staff and the Planning Commission to review the City's ordinances and enforcement of parking within the front yard setbacks and the legality of parking on the public right-of-way. This item came before the Planning Commission for discussion on November 20, 1990; April 2, 1991; and June 27, 1991. Following the June 27th meeting, a report and recommendation was presented to City Council at the regular meeting of July 23, 1991 at which time a public hearing on the matter was conducted. Following the public hearing, it was Council direction to send the item back to staff for further review of the parking question on a "citywide" basis. A report and recommendation was presented to Council at the regular meeting of February 11, 1992 at which time Council directed staff to report back on possible vacation of public properties on Prospect Avenue. -1- lk During this entire time, the parking enforcement activities with regard to parking on the public right-of-way along Beach Drive were being held in abeyance at the direction of the City Manager. It is the understanding of parking enforcement staff that no citations are to be written to vehicles parked on the public right-of-way. The enforcement activities that they currently conduct along Beach Drive are the same that they practice citywide and relate to parking over the red line and blocking driveways or garages Respectfully u • miffed, Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager 2 Noted: Lerdy Staten, Acting Director of General Services February 19, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of February 25, 1992 RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE MAYOR TO SIGN CORONER FACILITY TOUR AND AUTOPSY VIEWING INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Mayor to sign the attached Indemnification Agreement with the County Coroner. BACKGROUND: The County of Los Angeles Department of Coroner has found it necessary to strengthen internal security due to liability is- sues, health and safety concerns and the need to better coordi- nate access to its facilities. Effective immediately, law en- forcement personnel wishing to tour the coroner facility and/or view autopsies will be required to comply with terms and condi- tions set forth in the agreement. This is the second draft of the Coroner Indemnification Agree-, ment. The attached revised agreement clarifies and reflects add- ed language which would expressly exclude indemnification from our city where injuries to our personnel are caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of coroner employees. Addition- ally, the revised agreement further clarifies that our city's indemnification would be expressly limited to the service floor areas (autopsy rooms) of the Coroner's Facility which is the most hazardous. The City Attorney has reviewed the agreement and approved its signing. Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager cc: City Attorney Respetf lly submitted, f� ; Val Straser Acting Chief of Police 11 Ilona Lewis Director COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF CORONER December 6, 1991 1104 NU. MISSION RD.. I.IIS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 00033 TO: All Law Enforcement Agencesl, FROM: Ilona Lewis, Directo SUBJECT: REVISED CORONER 1 ACILITY TOUR AND AUTOPSY VIEWING INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT On November 13, 1991, Chief Ted Mertens, President of the Los Angeles County Police Chiefs Association, and other Association members met with Coroner staff to discuss the Coroner Indemnification Agreement sent to you on October 16, 1991. In response to the concerns expressed by all of the agencies and their counsel, the Indemnification Agreement was revised and later reviewed at the November, Los Angeles County.Police Chiefs Association meeting. The attached revised Agreement clarifies and reflects added language which would expressly exclude indemnification from your city where injures to your personnei are caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Coroner employees. Additionally, the revised agreement further clarifies that your city's indemnification would be expressly limited to the service floor areas (autopsy rooms) of the Coroner's Facility which is the most hazardous. Upon advice of our counsel, once the indemnification agreement is properly executed, the need for the individual officers to sign a separate Indemnification or Hold Harmless Agreement would be eliminated. However, we would still require that your authorized personnel sign in, while on the service floor, and wear a photo identification which verifies employment with your city. All authorized personnel will be required to wear protective garments prior to entering the service floor areas and abide by Coroner procedures and guidelines for their protection. Additionally, all personnel must execute an acknowledgement pertaining to the taking of photographs of decedents in compliance with Code of Civil Procedure Section 129. (See attached form) All Law Enforcement Agencies December 6, 1991 Page Two We would like to reiterate our willingness to work cooperatively with your agencies At the same time, however, we must protect the County against liability by strengthening our internal security and accessibility to our facility. Accordingly, as of March 1, 1992, unless our office receives an executed Indemnification Agreement by your city, your personnel will not be permitted to enter the service floor areas of our facility or to attend an autopsy. Those cities who have already executed the previously sent indemnification agreement are free to execute the attached revised agreement or leave the original in place. Please have your staff contact Ed du Conge, Contract Administrator, at (213) 343-0713, if you have further questions regarding the Agreement. Thank you for your cooperation. IL:eb Attachments c: County Counsel Ilona Lewis Director COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF CORONER 1104 NO. MISSION RD.. LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90033 Date: Coroner Case #: Coroner Case Name: Permission is granted to take photographs of the above named case with the understanding that the photographs will be used for law enforcement purposes only and that the photographs will not be duplicated for any other purposes in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 129. (Print Officer's Name) (Signature) (I.D.#) (Agency Name) CORONER FACILITY TOUR AND AUTOPSY - VIEWING INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of County of , wishes to have their personnel tour the facility of the Los Angeles County Department of Coroner (hereinafter "Coroner") during the performance of the duties of the Coroner and to observe autopsies and accompany Coroner's staff personnel during the performance of those official duties; WHEREAS, Coroner is concerned with its internal security and liability issues relating to health and safety and confidentiality concerns; WHEREAS, under Government Code Section 27491.4, Coroner has absolute discretion in allowing persons to be present during the performance of Coroner's autopsies; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Coroner allowing authorized personnel of the City of County of , to tour the facility of Coroner and to observe autopsies and accompany Coroner staff personnel during the performance of their official duties, the City of , County of does hereby agree to the following: 1. Requests for nonlaw enforcement personnel tours shall first be submitted in writing to Bob Dambacher or Scott Carrier, Public Information Office, Department of Coroner, 1104 North Mission Road, Los Angeles, California. 2. All authorized City personnel shall sign in at the beginning of the tour or before entering the service floor areas and show a photo identification which verifies employment with City of 3. All authorized City personnel shall abide by the rules and procedures set forth by the Coroner, and put on protective garments provided by the Coroner prior to entering service floor areas. 4. All authorized City personnel who wish to take photographs of decedents shall sign an acknowledgement that photographs may only be used. for law enforcement purposes in compliance with Code of Civil Procedure Section 129. INDEMNIFICATION 5. The City of , County of , agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless "Coroner" and County of Los Angeles, their agents, officers and employees from any and all liability, expense including defense costs, legal fees and claims for injuries and damages to and workers compensation for City personnel arising out of said personnel being present in the autopsy room or on the service floor areas of the Department of Coroner and while observing autopsies anti:/or accompanying Coroner personnel in the performance of their official duties in autopsy room and service floor areas. This indemnification and hold harmless shall not be applicable to those claims, causes of action, damages, costs, expenses, judgments or liabilities arising out of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of agents, officers or employees of Coroner, or County of Los Angeles. The undersigned declares that I am an authorized agent of the City of , County of and am authorized by the City of County of , to execute this Indemnification Agreement and is binding against the City of , County of its agents, officers and employees. City of By: Name: of the City of Authorized Agent County of Title: CITY SEAL: Revised: 12/11/91 / 2 RECEIVED FEB 1 3 199Y CITY MGR. OFFICE 2/11/92 Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach re: Storm Drain at 18th and the beach. Recent rains have reinforced the urgent requirement to take immediate action to eliminate or modify the extremely dangerous and unsightly storm drain exiting on the beach at 18th street. As you know, this is the only storm drain that empties onto the middle of the beach. As a result, there forms a Targe "lake", sometimes 20 to 30 yards in diameter, and at least 10 to 15 feet deep. The water is filled with every imaginable toxic material, usually black in color, and when the water finally drains into the sand it leaves a residue of this toxicity, also black in color, for most of the winter months. When this black hole is filled with water or drained, leaving it's residue, it is a magnet for children who play around it as if it is their " swimming pool° or private sand box. Someone, sometime is going to fall in and drown or eat this stuff and get real sick and the city will certainly be liable. Aesthetically the hole is a disaster. For much of the winter, their sits a black ugly looking tar pit which frequently elicits vulgarities from strolling residents that can only be classified as a public relations fiasco ---needless to say the incredible imposition on the ten or so families who live near it. Most of the other drains are extended under the sand so the water runs directly to the ocean and doesn't result in the pooling that exists at 18th. Whatever the solution, this situation must be resolved quickly. I ask that this letter be agendized for discussion and resolution as soon as possible. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Chuck and Missy Sheldon 1800 The Strand, Hermosa Beach 41a RECEIVED JAN 2 9 1992 CITY MGR. nP9CE K. M. Peterson District Manager January 27, 1992 Honorable Kathleen Midstokke, Mayor City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mayor Midstokke, GTE California Incorporated P.O Box 1277 Torrance. CA 90505-0277 It has been brought to my attention that the City of Hermosa Beach is asking GTE to relocate 18 public telephones for various newly dis- covered encroachment violations. In light of the fact that some of these phones have been in service for more than 20 years I am asking the city's permission to wave this request. GTE has worked in cooperation with various businesses in Hermosa Beach to provide a valuable community resource. Public telephones provide coin free access to Hermosa's 911 emergency service, and convenience for shoppers and visitors. If encroachment viola- tions occurred during the installation of these phones, they were unintentional and GTE is happy to work with the city to make sure no violations occur in the future. GTE believes the public phones in question should be entitled to perscriptive easement rights and we ask that they be grandfathered. If I can answer any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at (310) 373-7331. Sincerely, KEVIN M. PE RSON District Manager c: Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager A part of GTE Corporation 4b 4 p 44--L*4.4" February 19, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 25, 1992 MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 1992-92 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the revisions to estimated revenue, appropriations, budget transfers and designations as presented in the "City of Hermosa Beach Budget Summary, 1991-92 Midyear Review", attached as Attachment A. Background: The City has conducted a Midyear Budget Review annually since fiscal year 1981-82. The review is a good tool to ensure that assumptions and estimates originally used to prepare the budget ten months earlier remain realistic. Since this is the second year of our first two-year budget, the 91-92 budget (which was developed fourteen months earlier) has already been revised once on June 25, 1992. At that time, due to lower revenue estimates and higher expenditure estimates, a combination of measures was used to balance the budget: reductions in appropriations; increased transient occupancy tax rate from 8% to 10%; new commercial landlord business license; increased rates on Lot F; administrative charges to the Asset Forfeiture Fund; sale of Prop A funds; and use of carry over funds from previous year. Analysis: The Problem (See Attachment B) Virtually every City in California is experiencing a revenue shortfall due to the depressed economy. In addition, after our last budget revision, the state, in balancing their budget, took actions which affected our revenue. The revenue shortfall, combined with increasing insurance costs, results in a budget gap of $752,215 for the General Fund. The analysis will focus on the General Fund, since it is the main operating fund of the City, and the Parking Fund. Excess funds in the Parking Fund transfer to the General Fund. Revenue Shortfall (See Attachment C) The revenue shortfall occurs primarily in four areas: (1) sales tax, (2) In -Lieu Motor Vehicle fees (3) police fines and forfeitures, and (4) parking fines. 1 Sales Tax (Attachment D) Sales tax receipts, as revised, represent 17% of the General Fund budget and, for the first half of 91-92, are 15% lower than the first half of 1990-91; our projected sales tax revenue has not been this low since the 1984-85 fiscal year, but is reflective of a statewide trend. State sales tax is down 4.6%, L. A. County down 7 1/2%. This is the first decline in State sales tax since the recession of 1982. Our sales tax is lower primarily due to our dependence on auto dealers. In 90-91, auto sales comprised 27% of our sales tax as shown on Attachment E. Comparing the first half of this year to the last half of last year, auto sales are down 38% (Attachment F). Statewide, new auto sales are down 12.8% and used autos are down 5.8%. Our higher variance reflects the loss of the AMC Jeep dealership last year which has not been replaced with a like business. In -Lieu Motor Vehicle Our allocation of In -Lieu Motor Vehicle fees received from the State is also lower due to declining auto sales. The estimate was already revised once to reflect the impact of our lower population (federal census). This is a revenue source which has been eyed by the State in the past for budget balancing. Since annual revenue exceeds $600,000, loss of the revenue could be devastating. Police Fines/Forfeitures Police fines and forfeitures is reduced by $80,000 as a result of the State's legislative action to cap our revenue at 50% of the 90/91 revenue plus 5%. Any excess funds from counties and cities go to the State to balance their budget. This action occurred after our budget revision, as did the 47% reduction in our cigarette tax allocation ($17,291). Parking Citations The other major revenue revision is the reduction in parking citation revenue of $172,610, a 13% reduction. The bad weather this summer was a major factor contributing to the reduced revenue. Both Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach have experienced similar declines, 25% and 17%, respectively. The public information program which encourages a less aggressive stance on ticket issuance has also contributed to the decline. The graph, Attachment G, depicts this trend. With the recommended revisions, General Fund revenue for 91-92 will be 1.03% higher than 90-91; Parking Fund revenue will be 6% lower. Neither of these trends bode well for 92-93. Insurance Fund Charges (see last page of Attachment H) Insurance Fund costs for liability, worker's compensation, unemployment, property insurance and bonds are distributed to all departments based on established formulas. The increase of $156,300 in worker's compensation and unemployment increases the General Fund charge by $137,107. Worker's compensation costs are up 1% from 90-91; liability costs are up 34%. Recommended Appropriation Revisions (see Attachment H) Upon revising the revenue estimates and determining the actual shortfall, departments were instructed to identify reductions which could be made to offset the shortfall. Attachment D reflects those reductions and a few necessary additions. Reductions total $350,145 for the General Fund and $67,928 in the Parking Fund. Reductions in capital improvement projects return $48,128 to the General Fund. Two notable reductions listed are $135,000 for the Data Processing system and $50,000 for the Cushmans. If the City Council approves all of the recommended revisions, but wishes to fund the Data Processing system, one source of funds would be the $200,000 designated for South School which is available since the Council elected to use Park Recreation Facility Tax Funds rather than the General Fund. With respect to the Cushmans, since the Council directed that staff explore alternative vehicles, it is recommended that the purchase be deferred now, but that a recommendation be included in the 92-93 budget request. Salaries for each department were recalculated to identify savings occurring due to vacancies or turnover. Remaining non -mandatory conference and training funds were also identified for reduction. These revisions are shown on Attachment I. Use of State Gas Tax Funds It is recommended that $100,000 of State Gas Tax funds be used in place of General Fund money to fund a portion of the Street Maintenance Division. 95% of the division's activities qualify for State Gas Tax use. The only caveat with respect to such use would be consideration of our Prop 111 Maintenance of Effort (MOE) requirement. Prop 111, by vote of the people, increased the gas tax to provide funds for transportation purposes. In order to keep the allocation, each city must spend at a level determined by the State Controller. The level is a three year average of 1987-88 through 1989-90. Considering the amount currently budgeted, we have a margin of $138,000 compared to our MOE, therefore using $100,000 for street maintenance will not negatively impact our Prop 111 allocation. The State Gas Tax Fund balance at the end of this year, allowing for use of the $100,000 and the TDA funds for the Strand Project, is estimated to be over $300,000. Downtown Foot Patrol/Bootleg Enforcement The 6% Utility User Tax is used to pay for sewer construction/maintenance, bootleg enforcement and downtown foot patrol. $250,000 was budgeted each fiscal year in the 91-92 budget for bootleg enforcement and foot -patrol. Foot patrol costs include officers assigned on Friday - Sunday nights and additional officers assigned during the summer and special events. Bootleg enforcement costs include the assigned Building Department inspector's salary and fringe benefits and a portion of the City Prosecutor. Costs for 91-92 have been recalculated using updated salary and benefit amounts. Staff recommends that the additional $70,830, which is the difference between the original estimate of $250,000 and the recalculated costs, be transferred from the 6% UUT Fund to the General Fund to cover the cost of these programs. Summary As depicted in Attachment J, the City has been successful at maintaining a level fund balance and a positive margin between revenue and expenditures until now. Since carryover funds were used to offset a revenue shortfall once during the June revision, staff does not recommend doing so now. The same would be true for 92-93. Use of reserves to offset this current shortfall would have reduced the fund by almost 50%. It is imperative to maintain a reasonable fund balance to serve as a cushion during economic uncertainty. The revised ending fund balance of $1,529,376 is at approximately the same level as the revised balance in June, after allowing for the $500,000 used for South School. Since the fund balance left from last year was higher than estimated, $200,603 is undesignated. It is recommended that the amount be added to the Designation for Contingencies as shown in the Budget Summary. If the City Council approves the midyear revisions, staff will turn their attention to the 92-93 Budget. Assuming the economy will not change drastically for most of 92-93, the shortfall will likely be over $1 million. A shortfall of this size will necessitate organizational changes, so staff recommends that we begin immediately on 92-93 budget preparation. Staff is already headed in this direction with the reorganization and reduction of Police/General Services budget. To facilitate some feedback from the City Council on the 92-93 budget, a partial list of considerations for next year's budget is included as Attachment K. Staff would welcome any feedback or additional comments from the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Viki Copeland Finance Director Interim City Manager Concur: Steve Wisniewski 4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 1991-92 MIDYEAR REVIEW VEHICLE GENERAL LIGHTING PARKING PARKING STATE GAS COUNTY GAS FUND FUND DISTRICT FUND TAX FUND TAX FUND ESTIMATED REVENUE 001 105 109 110 115 120 Taxes $6,448,687 $184,637 SO SO SO SO Licenses/Permits $245,836 SO $0 SO $0 SO Fines/Forfeitures 5114,996 SO $0 51,127,390 $0 SO Use of Money/Property 5611,880 S90,785 $205,451 S14,191 586,650 S1,809 Intergovernmental/State 5748,422 SO $0 SO S518,865 $0 Intergovernmental/County $0 SO SO $0 SO SO Intergovernmental/Federal $0 SO SO SO SO SO Current Service Charges 5431,022 SO $648 S920,006 50 SO Other Revenue $37,799 $0 $0 SO $0 SO TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE 58,638,642 S275,422 5206,099 S2,061,587 5605,515 S1,809 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $1,646,756 SO $0 SO $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $10,285,398 $275,422 S206,099 $2,061,587 5605,515 S1,809 ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/91 S2,780,582 S1,466,608 S722,020 $1,348,372 S1,799,094 541,502 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE S13,065,980 $1,742,030 $928,119 $3,409,959 $2,404,609 $43,311 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget S9,677,450 $324,379 S107,432 $858,985 SO SO Capital Outlay S356,428 SO SO S1,700 SO SO Capital Improvements SO $0 SO SO SO SO TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS S10,033,878 $324,379 $107,432 $860,685 SO SO INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $1,503,066 S36,560 S16,365 $1,200,902 $1,879,433 S34,841 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFER OUT S11,536,944 $360,939 $123,797 $2,061,587 $1,879,433 $34,841 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE $1,529,036 * S1,381,091 $804,322 ** $1,348,372 *** S525,176 58,470 6/30/92 ** DESIGNATION FOR *DESIGNATED FOR: ASSET REPLACEMENT S120,000 LAND ACQUISITION ***RESERVED $14,846 CAP IMPROVEMENTS 5427,443 5100,000 FIXED ASSETS $1,333,526 CONTINGENCY $669,762 AFFORD HSG $111,831 SCHOOL PROP ACO $200,000 - Attachment A - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 1991-92 MIDYEAR REVIEW PARK REC UUT RR RIGHT 6%UUT PROP A GRANT FAC TAX FUND OF WAY FUND FUND FUND FUND ESTIMATED REVENUE 125 126 127 145 150 Taxes $14,000 5906,954 $1,360,441 $208,300 $0 Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Use of Money/Property $80,000 $30,000 $8,375 $23,182 $0 Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0 $17,500 (59,765) Current Service Charges $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Revenue $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE 5194,000 $936,954 $1,368,816 5248,982 $30,235 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $33,685 $0 $0 59,766 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE 5194,000 5970,639 $1,368,816 5248,982 $40,001 t ACTUAL FUND BALANCE $0 7/1/91 52,104,229 $1,002,789 $46,429 5398,670 $154,521 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 52,298,229 51,973,428 $1,415,245 $647,652 $194,522 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $0 $40,085 $0 $445,829 0 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 $0 0 Capital Improvements $0 $618,813 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $0 5658,898 $0 $445,829 $0 •INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $2,071,185 $0 $1,120,830 5918 $40,000 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFER OUT $2,071,185 $658,898 $1,120,830 $446,747 $40,000 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE $227,044 $1,314,530 $294,415 $200,905 $154,522 6/30/92 ESTIMATED REVENUE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 1991-92 MIDYEAR REVIEW CR GRD SEWER ASSET FORF FIRE CAP PROJECTS INSURANCE FUND FUND FUND PROTECTION FUND FUND TOTAL 155 160 170 180 305 705 Taxes 558,953 SO SO f0 f0 f0 $9,181,972 Licenses/Permits SO SO SO SO SO $0 5245,836 Fines/Forfeitures SO SO $1,686,446 SO SO SO 52,928,832 Use of Money/Property $4,153 $140,298 $80,000 $25,839 $0 SO $1,402,613 Intergovernmental/State $0 SO SO 50 SO SO $1,307,287 Intergovernmental/County 50 $4,000 SO SO $0 50 54,000 Intergovernmental/Federal SO SO SO SO $0 SO . 57,735 Current Service Charges $0 $14,600 SO 50 SO SO $1,366,276 Other Revenue 50 SO $5,030 565,000 SO $0 $207,829 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE 563,106 5158,898 $1,771,476 590,839 50 $0 116,652,380 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN SO 5800,000 $0 $0 $5,728,215 11,069,230 $9,287,652 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE 563,106 5958,898 $1,771,476 $90,839 55,728,215 $1,069,230 525,940,032 ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/91 $66,668 52,274,732 (126,806) 5461,608 SO $334,868 514,975,886 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $129,774 $3,233,630 11,744,670 5552,447 55,728,215 $1,404,098 540,915,9114 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $55,193 5150,937 5335,753 5100,000 SO $1,069,230 $13,165,273 Capital Outlay SO SO 132,649 50 SO SO $390,777 Capital Improvements SO SO SO SO 55,728,215 SO 56,347,028 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $55,193 5150,937 $368,402 $100,000 55,728,215 $1,069,230 519,903,078 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $3,104 51,320,692 559,756 SO SO f0 $9,287,652 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFER OUT $58,297 $1,471,629 5428,158 $100,000 $5,728,215 $1,069,230 $29,190,730 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 171,477 51,762,001 * 51,316,512 1452,447 10 1334,868 511,725,188 6/30/92 * DESIGNATED FOR SEWER CONTINGENCY $100,000 SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND BUDGET REVISIONS General Fund Revenue Shortfall Parking Fund Revenue Shortfall (impacts General Fund) Insurance Fund Increase to General Fund $398,001 217,107 137,107 Total Revision Needed $752,215 Revisions General Fund Appropriation Revisions ($350,145) Parking Fund (67,928) Capital Improvement Revisions (return to General Fund) (48,128) Salary/Retirement Savings due to turnover/vacancies (80,692) Reduction in remaining Conference/Training Use of State Gas Tax Funds for Street Maintenance Reimbursement to General Fund from Division Utility User Tax Fund for Foot Patrol/Bootleg Enforcement viki/budsum (34,492) (100,000) (70, 830) ($752,215) - Attachment B - GENERAL FUND Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 3103 Prior Year Collections 3102 Current Year Unsecured 3106 Supplemental Roll SB813 3107 Transfer Tax 3108 Sales Tax 3110 Cable TV Franchise 3111 Electric Franchise 3112 Gas Franchise 3113 Refuse Franchise 3114 Transient Occupancy 3115 Business License Licenses and Permits 3202 Dog Licenses 3203 Bicycle Licenses 3204 Building Permits 3205 Electric Permits 3206 Plumbing Permits 3207 Occupancy Permits 3209 Garage Sales 3211 Banner Permits 3212 Animal /Fowl Permits 3213 Animal Redemption Fee 3214 Amplified Sound Permit 3215 Temporary Sign Permit 3216 Spray Booth Permit 3217 Open Fire Permit 3218 Auto Repair Permit 3221 Beach Volleyball App ESTIMATED REVENUE 12-31-91 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1991-92 MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW REVENUE WORKSHEET MIDYEAR REVISION INCREASE (DECREASE) JUSTIFICATION $3,369,640.00 $3,299,455.00 ($70,185.00) $20,000.00 $127,001.00 $107,001.00 $255,705.00 $222,102.00 ($33,603.00) $125,000.00 $135,000.00 $10,000.00 $70,000.00 $70,000.00 $0.00 CHANGE TO 60 DAY ACCRUAL RULE AS APPROVED BY AUDITORS $30,000 INCREASE BETWEEN ACCOUNTS BASED ON PRIOR YEAR RECEIPTS TO DATE ACTUAL LEVY LESS THAN 10% ASSUMPTION BASED ON 90/91, 1ST HALF UP 16% $1,750,000.00 $1,500,000.00 ($250,000.00) 1ST TWO QTRS DOWN 15% FROM 90-91 DUE TO LOSS OF AUTO DEALER LAST YEAR $130,000.00 $130,000.00 $0.00 AND ECONOMY'S EFFECT ON AUTO SALES $41,478.00 $41,478.00 $0.00 $29,603.00 $29,603.00 $0.00 $154,350.00 $160,000.00 $5,650.00 HIGHER DUE TO RECYCLING RATE INCREASE $244,048.00 $244,048.00 $0.00 $452,400.00 $490,000.00 $37,600.00 COMMERCIAL LANDLORD BUSINESS LICENSE IMPLEMENTATION, $6,642,224.00 $6,448,687.00 ($193,537.00) $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $0.00 $200.00 $200.00 $0.00 $170,000.00 $155,000.00 ($15,000.00) $40,000.00 $25,000.00 ($15,000.00) $32,000.00 $25,000.00 ($7,000.00) $9,000.00 $10,000.00 $1,000.00 $140.00 $220.00 $80.00 $4,070.00 $4,070.00 $0.00 $650.00 , $650.00 $0.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $0.00 $1,050.00 $2,290.00 $1,240.00 $900.00 $900.00 $0.00 $75.00 $150.00 $75.00 $172.00 $86.00 ($86.00) $114.00 $570.00 $456.00 $200.00 $200.00 $0.00 $280,071.00 $245,836.00 ($34,235.00) FIRST HALF UP 17% LOWER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY LOWER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY LOWER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY INCREASED BUSINESS TURNOVER INCREASED GARAGE SALES 6 -MO AVERAGE PROJECTION CONCERTED EFFORT BY FIRE DEPT TO COLLECT NEW USER FEES PERMITS HAVE NOT BEEN ISSUED CONCERTED EFFORT BY FIRE DEPT TO COLLECT NEW USER FEES - Attachment C - Fines & Forfeitures 3301 Vehicle Code Violations 3303 Court Fines/Police Dept 3401 * 3402 3403 3404 3405 3406 3411 3412 3414 3418 Use of Money & Property Interest Income Rents & Concessions Pier Revenue Comm Ctr Leases Comm Ctr Rentals Comm Ctr Theatre Other Facilities Tennis Courts Prop P Conversion Special Events Intergovernmental/State 3504 In Lieu Off Highway 3505 In Lieu Motor Vehicle 3507 Highway Maintenance 3509 Homeowner Prop Tx Retie 3510 Post 3511 Stc-Svc Off Training 3514 Cigarette Tax Current Service Charges 3801 Residential Inspection 3802 Sign Review 3803 Environmental Impact 3805 Condtl Use Permit Amend 3806 Board of Appeals 3808 Zone Variance Review 3809 Tentative Map Review 3810 Final Map Review 3811 Zone Change G P A 3812 Conditional Use Review $135,000.00 $60,000.00 $114,996.00 $0.00 $195,000.00 $114,996.00 $237,180.00 $3,000.00 $10,700.00 $90,000.00 $52,000.00 $30,000.00 $26,000.00 $13,000.00 $110,000.00 $30,000.00 $601,880.00 $333.00 $688,312.00 $4,000.00 $66,500.00 $48,700.00 $8,500.00 $36,790.00 $853,135.00 $9,000.00 $4,000.00 $7,965.00 $1,650.00 $300.00 $3,700.00 $0.00 $4,050.00 $2,400.00 $24,000.00 ($20,004.00) THESE TWO ACCTS WILL BE COMBINED & ($60,000.00) RENAMED "MUNICIPAL COURT FINES" ($80,004.00) STATE CAPPED CITY REVENUE AT 50% OF 90/91 REVENUE + 5%, WITH EXCESS GOING TO STATE TO BALANCE BUDGET $237,180.00 $0.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 $10,700.00 $0.00 $100,000.00 $10,000.00 LEASE RATE INCREASES $52,000.00 $0.00 $34,000.00 $4,000.00 INCREASE IN JULY -DEC RENTALS $26,000.00 $0.00 $13,000.00 $0.00 $106,000.00 ($4,000.00) $.53/$1 BEST EXCHANGE RATE AVAILABLE $30,000.00 $0.00 $611,880.00 $10,000.00 $333.00 $633,960.00 $4,000.00 $64,780.00 520,000.00 $5,850.00 $19,499.00 $0.00 ($54,352.00) 1ST HALF RECEIPTS DOWN 8% FROM 90/91, DECREASED AUTO SALES $0.00 ($1,720.00) ($28,700.00) 6 -MO AVERAGE PROJECTION, DEPARTMENT TRAINING REDUCED ($2,650.00) STATE MANDATED 7%-10% REDUCTION ($17,291.00) SB21 TRANSFERRED 47% TO STATE TO BALANCE BUDGET $748,422.00 ($104,713.00) $7,800.00 $4,000.00 $8,543.00 $4,962.00 $150.00 $1,892.00 $962.00 $2,802.00 $3,765.00 $6,493.00 ($1,200.00) $0.00 $578.00 $3,312.00 ($150.00) ($1,808.00) $962.00 ($1,248.00) $1,365.00 ($17,507.00) DECREASE IN HOME SALES MORE PROJECTS THAN EXPECTED MORE PROJECTS THAN EXPECTED NO APPLICATIONS 1ST HALF OF YEAR LESS PROJECTS THAN EXPECTED MORE PROJECTS THAN EXPECTED LESS PROJECTS THAN EXPECTED MORE PROJECTS THAN EXPECTED LESS PROJECTS THAN EXPECTED 3813 Plan Check Fees 3814 Planning/Zoning Appeal 3815 Public Works Services 3817 Special Curb Marking 3818 Police Services 3819 Jail Services 3820 Trusty Admin Fee 3821 Fingerprint Service 3823 Special Event Security 3825 Public Notice Posting 3826 Rec Programs/Classes 3827 Library Grounds Maint 3831 Street Cut Inspection 3834 Encroachment Permit 3836 Fumigation Inspect Fee 3837 Returned Check Charge 3838 Sale of Map/Publication 3839 Photocopy Charges 3840 Ambulance Transport 3841 Police Towing 3857 Parking Plan Application 3858 Tenant Refuse Billing 3859 Refuse Lien Fee 3861 Hazardous Matl Permit 3862 Alarm Permit Fee 3863 False Alarm Fee 3866 Nonconforming Remodels 3867 Precise Devlmnt Plans 3868 Public Noticing/300 Ft 3869 2nd Party Response 3870 Legal Determination Hrg 3871 Paramedic Resp/Non-Transp 3872 Lock -Out (Car) 3873 Lock -Out (House) 3874 Flooding Water Removal 3875 Spray Booth Inspection 3876 Fire Protect/Sys Existg 3877 Sprinkler 4ert Test 3878 Comm Bldg/Apt Inspect 3883 Final/Tent Map Extnsion 3884 Lot Line Adjust 3890 300' Radius Notcg/Apl CC $105,000.00 $95,000.00 ($10,000.00) $2,132.00 $2,132.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 $420.00 $420.00 $0.00 $23,000.00 $13,084.00 ($9,916.00) $10,200.00 $17,730.00 $7,530.00 $150.00 $560.00 $410.00 $2,000.00 $2,760.00 $760.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $80.00 $80.00 S0.00 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $0.00 $5,075.00 $5,075.00 $0.00 $40,000.00 $30,000.00 ($10,000.00) $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $0.00 $8,000.00 $8,516.00 $516.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $500.00 $500.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00. $0.00 $9,000.00 $9,500.00 $500.00 $26,500.00 $28,500.00 $2,000.00 $1,840.00 $3,764.00 $1,924.00 $130.00 $130.00 $0.00 $500.00 $840.00 $340.00 $1,500.00 $2,100.00 $600.00 $1,800.00 $2,940.00 $1,140.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $2,680.00 S4,843.00 $2,163.00 $1,145.00 $8,331.00 $7,186.00 $7,975.00 $13,650.00 $5,675.00 $1,500.00 $500.00 ($1,000.00) $0.00 $1,046.00 $1,046.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $240.00 $240.00 $0.00 $190.00 $190.00 $0.00 $174.00 $174.00 $0.00 $900.00 $900.00 $0.00 $210.00 $105.00 ($105.00) $92.00 $92.00 $0.00 $1,750.00 5875.00 ($875.00) $450.00 $1,841.00 $1,391.00 $515.00 $0.00 ($515.00) $920.00 $1,035.00 $115.00 $445,833.00 $431,022.00 ($14,811.00) LOWER BUILDING ACTIVITY 1991 USE FEE SCHED CHGS;6-MO AVG PROJECTION 6 -MO AVERAGE 6 -MO AVERAGE 6 -MO AVERAGE PROJECTION PROJECTION PROJECTION DEPRESSED ECONOMY BASED ON PERMITS PENDING AND ESTIMATE OF 12 ADDITIONAL PERMITS COLLECTIONS ARE IMPROVING SEASONAL, 6 -MO AVERAGE PROJECTION MORE PROJECTS THAN EXPECTED ACTUAL LIEN AMOUNT CONCERTED EFFORT BY FIRE DEPT TO COLLECT NEW USER FEES 6 -MO AVERAGE PROJECTION MORE PROJECTS THAN EXPECTED MORE PROJECTS THAN EXPECTED MORE PROJECTS THAN EXPECTED BASED ON FIRST HALF BILLINGS BASED ON 1ST HALF THE NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS IS LESS RE -INSPECTIONS LESS THAN ESTIMATED MORE PROJECTS THAN EXPECTED EXPECT NO PROJECT THAN ESTIMATED Other Revenue 3901 Sale of Real/Pers Property 3902 Refunds/Reimb Prev Yr 3903 Contributions Non Govt 3904 General Miscellaneous 3909 Late Fee FUND TOTAL LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 3103 Prior Year Collections Use of Money & Property 3401 * Interest Income FUND %TOTAL VEHICLE PARKING DIST FUND Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3407 Parking Lot Rental 3409 Lot 8 3413 VPD Lease Current Service Charges 3845 Lot Permits/caily 3846 Lot Permits/Monthly 3847 Validation Stamps $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $500.00 $3,314.00 $5,000.00 $25,465.00 $5,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $20.00 $0.00 $2,814.00 BASED ON FIRST HALF RECEIPTS $20,465.00 DARE GRANT, RELEAF CONTRIBUTIONS ($4,000.00) $20.00 $18,500.00 $37,799.00 $9,036,643.00 $8,638,642.00 $179,637.00 $179,637.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $184,637.00 $184,637.00 $90,785.00 $90,785.00 $275,422.00 $275,422.00 $1,809.00 $15,713.00 $22,990.00 $69,388.00 $109,900.00 $8,000.00 $10,000.00 $22,000.00 $40,000.00 FUND TOTAL $149,900.00 $9,738.00 $15,713.00 $0.00 $180,000.00 $19,299.00 ($398,001.00) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,929.00 BASED ON FIRST HALF INTEREST $0.00 NEW CONTRACT FOR LOTS, COMBINING ALL REVENUE TO ACCOUNT 3413 ($22,990.00) 11 $110,612.00 $205,451.00 $95,551.00 $149.00 $158.00 $341.00 ($7,851.00) ($9,842.00) ($21,659.00) $648.00 ($39,352.00) $206,099.00 $56,199.00 11 PARKING FUND Fines & Forfeitures 3302 Court Fines/Parking Use of Money & Property 3401 * Interest Income 3407 Parking Lot Rental $1,300,000.00 S1,127,390.00 ($172,610.00) POSITIVE ENFORCEMENT OF PUBLIC INF. PROG., EFFECT OF OFFICERS OUT WITH INJURIES, INCLEMENT WEATHER $18,894.00 $7,200.00 $26,094.00 $6,991.00 $7,200.00 ($11,903.00) BASED ON FIRST HALF INTEREST $0.00 $14,191.00 ($11,903.00) Current Service Charges 3842 Parking Meters $758,000.00 $725,406.00 3843 Parking Permits: Annual $191,000.00 $191,000.00 3844 Daily Parking Permits $1,500.00 $1,500.00 3848 Driveway Permits $500.00 5500.00 3849 Guests Permits $600.00 $600.00 3850 Contractor's Permits $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $952,600.00 ($32,594.00) INCLEMENT WEATHER $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $920,006.00 ($32,594.00) FUND TOTAL $2,278,694.00 $2,061,587.00 ($217,107.00) STATE GAS TAX FUND Use of Money & Property 3401 * Interest Income Intergovernmental/State 3501 Section 2106 Allocation 3502 Section 2107 Allocation 3503 Section 2107.5 Allocation 3512 Section 2105 (PROP 111) 3522 TDA Article 3/Local 3537 TDA Articl 3/Regnl . FUND TOTAL COUNTY GAS TAX FUND $23,584.00 $74,165.00 $155,400.00 $4,000.00 $78,080.00 $0.00 $0.00 $311,645.00 $335,229.00 Use of Money & Property 3401 * Interest Income $1,809.00 $86,650.00 $63,066.00 HIGHER FUND BALANCE DUE TO TDA FUNDS $70,621.00 $143,553.00 $4,000.00 $78,080.00 $4,611.00 5218,000.00 ($3,544.00) 1ST HALF RECEIPTS DOWN 5X ($11,847.00) 1ST HALF RECEIPTS DOWN 9% $0.00 $0.00 $4,611.00 LOCAL BIKEWAY FUNDS $218,000.00 FUNDING FOR STRAND PROJECT $518,865.00 $207,220.00 $605,515.00 $270,286.00 $1,809.00 $0.00 FUND TOTAL PARK & RECREATION FACILITY FUND $1,809.00 Taxes 3116 Park Rec Facility Tax $7,000.00 Use of Money & Property 3401 * Interest Income $92,728.00 Other Revenue 3910 Park/Recreation in Lieu $130,000.00 FUND TOTAL $229,728.00 UUT RAILROAD R/W FUND Taxes 3120 Utility User Tax $906,954.00 Use Of Money & Property 3401 * Interest Income $30,000.00 FUND TOTAL 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND Taxes $936,954.00 $1,809.00 $0.00 $14,000.00 $7,000.00 BASED ON CURRENT ACTIVITY $80,000.00 ($12,728.00) FUND BALANCE LOWER DUE TO PURCHASE OF SOUTH SCHOOL $100,000.00 ($30,000.00) DECREASE IN CONDO DEVELOPMENT $194,000.00 ($35,728.00) $906,954.00 $0.00 $30,000.00 $0.00 $936,954.00 $0.00 3120 Utility User Tax $1,360,441.00 $1,360,441.00 $0.00 Use Of Money & Property 3401 * Interest Income $8,375.00 FUND TOTAL $1,368,816.00 PROPOSITION A' FUND Taxes 3117 Proposition A Transit 3121 Subregnl Incentive Funds 5210,914.00 $0.00 $8,375.00 50.00 $1,368,816.00 $0.00 5173,896.00 534,404.00 (537,018.00) REDUCED ALLOCATION DUE TO LOWER SALES TAX $34,404.00 LATE ALLOCATION FROM LACTC Use of Money & Property 3401 * Interest Income Current Service Charges 3854 Fares Dial A Ride 3855 Bus Passes FUND TOTAL GRANT FUND Intergovernmental/State 3517 Office of Traffic Sfty G Intergovernment/federal ") 3701 Federal Aid Urban FUND TOTAL CROSSING GUARD FUND Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 3103 Prior Year Collections Use of Money & Property 3401 * Interest Income FUND TOTAL SEWER FUND Use of Money & Property 3401 * Interest Income $210,914.00 $208,300.00 ($2,614.00) $23,182.00 $23,182.00 $0.00 $11,500.00 $11,500.00 $0.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $0.00 $17,500.00 $17,500.00 $0.00 $251,596.00 $248,982.00 ($2,614.00) $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $0.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($9,765.00) ($9,765.00) PRIOR YEAR REIMBURSEMENT REFUNDED TO STATE $0.00 ($9,765.00) ($9,765.00) $40,000.00 $30,235.00 ($9,765.00) $53,953.00 $53,953.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 $58,953.00 $58,953.00 $0.00 $2,479.00 $4,153.00 $1,674.00 BASED ON FIRST HALF INTEREST $61,432.00 $63,106.00 $1,674.00 $140,298.00 $140,298.00 $0.00 Intergovernmental/County 3602 Beach Outlet Maintenance Current Service Charges 3828 Sewer Connection Fee 3829 Sewer Demolition Fee 3832 Sewer Lateral Installtn FUND TOTAL ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND Fines & Forfeitures 3304 Forfeited Funds Use of Money and Property 3401 * Interest Income Other Revenue 3901 Sale of Reat/Pers Prop FUND TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION FUND Use Of Money & Property 3401 * Interest Income $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $18,000.00 $12,000.00 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $20,600.00 $14,600.00 $164,898.00 $158,898.00 $0.00 ($6,000.00) DECREASE IN NEW DEVELOPMENT $0.00 $0.00 ($6,000.00) ($6,000.00) $400,000.00 $1,686,446.00 $1,286,446.00 HERMOSA BEACH SHARE OF LARGE SEIZURE RECEIVED $8,509.00 $80,000.00 $71,491.00 HIGHER FUND BALANCE DUE TO RECEIPT OF LARGE SEIZURE $0.00 $5,030.00 $5,030.00 $408,509.00 $1,771,476.00 $1,362,967.00 $20,368.00 Other Revenue 3912 Fire Flow Fee $100,000.00 FUND TOTAL $120,368.00 GRAND TOTALS $25,839.00 $5,471.00 BASED ON FIRST HALF INTEREST $65,000.00 ($35,000.00) DECREASE IN NEW DEVELOPMENT $90,839.00 ($29,529.00) $15,659,998.00 $16,652,380.00 $992,382.00 SALES TAX 1984-85 THROUGH 1990-91 ACTUAL, 1991-92 PROJECTED 1800 1700 1600 1500 1400 1300 1200 SALES TAX IN THOUSANDS 84-85 85-86 86-87 87-88 88-89 89-90 90-91 91-92 - Attachment D - SALES TAX 1990 EAT/DRINK 13.0% 18 AUTO 27.0%27 91 GROCERY STORE 10.0% 10 LUMBER/BLDG 6.0% 6 SPEC STORES 5.0% 5 SERV STATIONS 4.0% 4 OTHER 30.0% 30 - Attachment E - SALES TAX FIRST HALF OF FISCAL YEAR 91-92 • Major Sales Tax Categories Change from 90-91 AUTO -38% New Auto Used Auto GROCERY STORES W/LIQUOR EATING & DRINKING PLACES - 42% - 23% w/liquor -20% w/beer & wine +15% no alcohol -16% + 8% - 5% 0 LUMBER/BUILDING MATERIALS -12% SPECIALTY STORES +28% SERVICE STATIONS - 9% - Attachment F - PARKING FINES 1986-87 ACTUAL THROUGH 1990-91, 1991-92 PROJECTED 1500 1 400 1300 1200 1100 IN THOUSANDS 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 - Attachment G - REQUEST FOR APPROPRIATION REVISION MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 1991-92 ACCOUNT# 12/31/91 MIDYEAR INCREASE DEPT/OBJECT APPROPRIATION APPROPRIATION (DECREASE) JUSTIFICATION GENERAL FUND CITY TREASURER 1141-4201 $2,000.00 $1,500.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 1141-4315 $185.00 $0.00 CITY MANAGER 1201-4112 PART TIME FINANCE 1202-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES $2,185.00 $3,640.00 $39,995.00 ($500.00) DELETE UNUSED FUNDS THIS YEAR ($185.00) DELETE UNUSED FUNDS THIS YEAR $1,500.00 ($685.00) $0.00 ($3,640.00) ELIMINATE INTERN $32,495.00 ($7,500.00) DEFER MANAGEMENT AUDITS DATA PROCESSING 1206-5402 t $135,000.00 $0.00 ($135,000.00) THIS COULD BE REDUCED OR ELIMINATED ; PENDING COUNCIL DIRECTION EQUIPMENT OVER $500 PRELIMINARY INDICATIONS ARE THAT COUNCIL WISHES TO PURCHASE 1206-4201 $68,764.00 $48,764.00 ($20,000.00) ELIMINATE CONSULTANT THIS YEAR CONTRACT SERVICES $203,764.00 $48,764.00 ($155,000.00) 1212-4188 $695,000.00 $663,691.00 ($31,309.00) SAVINGS REALIZED THROUGH CHANGE IN BENEFIT CARRIERS AND VACANT POSITIONS PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES 1214-4322 $108,574.00 $0.00 ($108,574.00) UNUSED FUNDS BUDGETED FOR MOU NEGOTIATIONS UNCLASSIFIED AND UNEXPECTED EXPENDITURES POLICE 2101-4201 $116,923.00 $106,611.00 ($10,312.00) LATE IMPLEMENTATION OF MDT SYSTEM ALLOWS CONTRACT SERVICES REDUCTION IN MAINTENANCE THIS FISCAL YEAR 2101-6900 $159,766.00 $132,697.00 ($27,069.00) APPLY COST SAVINGS IN 6900 ACCOUNT TOWARDS PURCHASE OF LEASE PAYMENTS $17,979.00 $17,979.00 (4 DETECTIVE VEHICLES (FORD TAURUS); FIRST YEAR OF THREE YEAR LEASE PURCHASE; TOTAL PAYMENTS $53,937 $276,689.00 $239,308.00 ($19,402.00) - Attachment H - FIRE 2201-4187 UNIFORMS CIVIL DEFENSE 2701-4305 OFFICE SUPPLIES $21,726.00 $2,725.00 2701-5402 $2,500.00 $19,426.00 ($2,300.00) $15,000 WAS BUDGETED FOR PROTECTIVE CLOTHING; ACTUAL COST WAS $12,700 $725.00 ($2,000.00) POSTPONE PURCHASE OF FORMS & SUPPLIES $500.00 ($2,000.00) POSTPONE PLANNED PURCHASES OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS KIT AND GAS TRAC EQUIPMENT OVER $500 AND MAINTAIN MINIMAL BUDGET FOR MISC EQUIP NEEDS PLANNING 4101-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES 4101-5402 EQUIPMENT OVER $500 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 1`j 4601-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS MEDIANS s 3101-4303 UTILITIES $5,225.00 $1,225.00 $7,975.00 $13,650.00 $0.00 $1,590.00 $7,975.00 $59,250.00 $8,800.00 3101-4309 $5,000.00 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS TRAFFIC SAFETY 3104-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS PARKS 6101-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES 6101-4303 UTILITIES GENERAL FUND TOTAL $37,800.00 $144,875.00 $50,000.00 $246,475.00 ($4,000.00) $5,675.00 MORE PROJECTS; CORRESPONDS TO INCREASED REVENUE ESTIMATE. $1,590.00 HP LASER JET PRINTER SERIES III $15,240.00 $7,265.00 $61,250.00 $2,000.00 TO ACCOMMODATE INCREASED THEATRE RENTALS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS, CORRESPONDS TO INCREASED REVENUE; APPROX. 50% OF THEATRE RENTAL REVENUE IS PAID FOR THEATRE TECHS. $7,800.00 ($1,000.00) REDUCTION IN WATER USE FOR STREET MEDIANS $4,000.00 ($1,000.00) INCREASE IN MEDIANS DAMAGE RECOVERY COSTS $22,800.00 ($15,000.00) REDUCTION IN STREETS TO BE PAINTED THIS YEAR DUE TO SLURRY AND OVERLAY CONTRACTS (47 STREETS) $139,875.00 ($5,000.00) REDUCTION IN NUMBER OF TREES TO BE TRIMMED THIS YEAR $45,000.00 ($5,000.00) REDUCTION IN WATER USE FOR PARKS $219,475.00 ($27,000.00) $1,670,498.00 $1,302,374.00 ($350,145.00) PARKING FUND PARKING ENFORCEMENT 3302-4180 $68,395.00 $60,467.00 ($7,928.00) RETIREMENT SAVINGS DUE TO PERSONNEL SHORTAGES RETIREMENT 3302-5403 $50,000.00 $0.00 ($50,000.00) DEFER CUSHMANS FOR 91-92; EXPLORE ALTERNATIVE VEHICLES PER CITY COUNCIL VEHICLES DIRECTION; INCLUDE RECOMMENDATION IN 92-93 BUDGET REQUEST 3302-5499 $10,000.00 $0.00 ($10,000.00) METERS PURCHASE NOT APPROVED NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS PROP A FUND FUND EXCHANGE 3405-4251 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $128,395.00 $60,467.00 ($67,928.00) $110,000 $200,000 $90,000.00 FUND EXCHANGE OF $200,000 GENERATES UNRESTICTED $106,000 8601-4201 $2,000.00 Ln! FUEL DISPENSING SYSTEM 8604-4201 $17,533.00 $917.00 ($1,083.00) COMPLETED CONTRACT; RETURN FUNDS TO GEN FUND $488.00 ($17,045.00) DELAY REPAIR OF COMMUNITY CENTER STAGE FLOOR, CLARK BUILDING FLOOR; VARIOUS BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS RETURN FUNDS TO GENERAL FUND 8609-4201 POSSIBLE CITY HALL EXPANSION INSURANCE FUND UNEMPLOYMENT 1215-4186 WORKERS COMP 1217-4182 • TOTAL ALL FUNDS $30,000.00 $49,533.00 $0.00 ($30,000.00) DELAY MODULAR FURNITURE; RETURN FUNDS TO GENERAL FUND $1,405.00 ($48,128.00) $7,700.00 $14,000.00 $6,300.00 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS CHARGEABLE TO CITY BASED ON 7-90 THRU 9-91 CHARGES $290,000.00 $440,000.00 $150,000.00 UNEXPECTED MAJOR MEDICAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PREVIOUS WORKER'S COMP INJURIES , ANTICIPATED SETTLEMENTS TO BE PAID THIS FISCAL YEAR $297,700.00 $454,000.00 $156,300.00 WORKER'S COMP BUDGET WITH THIS INCREASE IS APPROXIMATELY THE SAME AS 90-91 EXPENDITURES $2,256,126.00 $2,018,246.00 ($219,901.00) 1991-92 MIDYEAR SALARY REVISIONS DEPARTMENT 1991-92 MIDYEAR REVIEW CONFERENCE/TRAINING FUNDS AVAILABLE 2/6/92 TOTAL GENERAL FUND REDUCTION 1121 CITY CLERK $524 1101 CITY COUNCIL $2,729 1202 FINANCE $7,415 1121 CITY CLERK $1,095 1201 POLICE SAFETY $43,871 1122 ELECTIONS $1,580 2201 FIRE $4,456 1141 CITY TREASURER $750 4205 TRAFFIC SAFETY $7,276 1201 CITY MANAGER $5,403 4101 PLANNING $3,016 1202 FINANCE $1,948 1203 PERSONNEL $992 $66,558 1205 CABLE TV $359 1206 DATA PROCESSING $441 1207 BUSINESS LICENSE $0 1208 GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS $644 RETIREMENT SAVINGS ASSOCIATED 2101 POLICE $3,065 WITH SALARY SAVINGS 2201 FIRE $2,911 2401 ANIMAL CONTROL $565 1213 RETIREMENT $14,134 2701 CIVIL DEFENSE $3,600 3103 STREET MAINTENANCE $600 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY $300 4101 PLANNING $1,443 4102 PLANNING COMMISSION $1,352 4201 BUILDING $723 4202 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION $0 4204 BUILDING MAINTENANCE $200 4205 EQUIPMENT SERVICE $200 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES $1,886 6101 PARKS $300 TOTAL $33,086 PARKING FUND PARKING ENFORCEMENT $1,406 TOTAL $1,406 GRAND TOTAL $34,492 — Attarhmant T — REVENUE/EXPENDITURES/FUND BALANCE 1986-87 THROUGH 1990-91 ACTUAL, 1991-92 PROJECTED REVENUE/ EXPEND/ FUND TRANSFERS TRANSFERS BALANCE 15000 10000 5000 0 IN THOUSANDS — — — s -r..--_'^''.r-. lam fto MEI ▪ 0.1 lag 1 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 - Attachment J - CONSIDERATIONS FOR 1992-93 BUDGET - Prepare one year budget instead of two due to economic uncertainty - Charge administration to CIP projects - Discontinue Capital Improvement Fund, pay CIP's directly from each fund which eliminates transfers - less confusing - Participate in CDBG program to exchange fund for unrestricted funds - Extend Utility User Tax to interstate calls on phone service as some other cities do. - Meter Pier Avenue - Explore contracting of city services. - Deposit parking fines directly to General Fund as was done prior to 1986. - Offer optional furlough or time off without pay. - Charge Street Lighting and Crossing Guard Districts for administration as was done prior to 1990-91. - Explore increase in parking fines (Redondo Beach). - Develop plan to encourage business in Hermosa Beach, i.e.. encourage chamber to match vacant property with businesses. - Attachment K - ,26 FINANCE—FA484 TIME 14: 16: 23 FUND 1'. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 OBJ DESCRIPTION 001 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3101 3102 3103 3106 3107 3108 3110 3111 3112 3113 EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 3114 3115 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /CURRENT YEAR SECURED /CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS /SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL 813813 /TRANSFER TAX /SALES TAX /CABLE TV FRANCHISE /ELECTRIC FRANCHISE /GAS FRANCHISE /REFUSE FRANCHISE '/TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY /BUSINESS LICENSE 3, 369, 640. 00 255, 705. 00 20, 000. 00 125, 000. 00 70, 000. 00 1, 750, 000. 00 130, 000. 00 41, 478. 00 29, 603. 00 154, 350. 00 244, 042. 00 452, 400. 00 6, 642, 224. 00 3200 LICENSES AND PERMITS 3202 /DOG LICENSES 18, 000. 00 3203 /BICYCLE LICENSES 200.00 3204 /13UILDING PERMITS 170, 000. 00 3205 /ELECTRIC PERMITS 40, 000. 00 3206 /PLUMBING PERMITS 32, 000. 00 3207 /OCCUPANCY PERMITS 9, 000. 00 3209 /GARAGE SALES 140.00 3211 /BANNER PERMITS 4, 070. 00 3212 /ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS 650.00 3213 /ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE 3, 500. 00 3214 /AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT 1, 050. 00 3215 /TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT 900.00 3216 /SPRAY BOOTH PERMIT 75. 00 3217 /OPEN FIRE PERMIT 172.00 3218 /AUTO REPAIR_PERMIT 114.00. 3221 /BEACH VOLLEYBALL APP 200.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3301 /VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS 3303 /COURT EINES/POLICE_DEPT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3400_USE_OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 3402 /RENTS & CONCESSIONS 3403 LPIER REVENUE 1, 360, 600. 19 0. 00 25, 328. 89- 1, 086. 25 4. 667. 57 99, 154. 16 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 30, 150. 63 0. 00 51, 558. 97 1, 521, 888. 88 1, 360, 600. 19 195, 080. 72 86, 953. 83 84, 352. 73 36, 312. 09 658, 200. 52 68, 064. 57 0. 00 0.00 80, 299. 56 124, 522. 88 251, 918. 39 2, 946, 305. 48 2, 009, 039. 81 40. 3 60, 624. 28 76. 2 66, 953. 83— 434. 7 40, 647. 27 67. 4 33, 687. 91 51.8 1:,,'' 1, 091, 799. 48 _____ 37. 6 __Lc 61, 935. 43 52. 3 41, 478. 00 0. 0 29.603. 00 } 0. 0 2.3 74, 050. 44 52. 0 i'_'' 119, 525. 12 51 0 J-5 2/ 200, 481. 61 55.6 3.695, 918. 52 44. 3 4 PAGE 0001 DATE 02/15/92 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED ) BALANCE 7. ) 8 1.1 37 21 211 813. 10 12, 222. 00 18. 90 89. 70 9, 873 50 71,435....02 3, 066. 65 10, 966. 75 1, 935. 35 11, 643. 90 668. 00 4, 902.50 9. 30 159. 20 193. 50 1, 884. 00 0 00 271.25 2, 393. 00 146. 00 1, 143. 50 63. 00 465. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 280, 071. 00 17, 064. 55 117, 404. 57 5, 778. 00 67. 9 110. 30 44.8 1 38, 564. 98 _ _ _ 42. 0 '61 29, 033. 25 27. 4 20, 356. 10 36. 3 .4..097. 50 54. 19. 20— 113. 7 2. 186. 00 46. 2 100. 00 550. 00_ _ 15. 3 ___ 1. 107. 00 68. 3 93. 50— 108. 9 435.00 51.6 75. 00 0. 0 172.00 0.0 135, 000. 00 6, 279. 71 60, 000. 00 1, 864.78 195, 000. 00 8, 144. 49 237, 180. 00 77, 202. 57 3, 000. 00 345. 06 10, 700. 00_ 69.60 46, 708. 64 12, 928. 88 59, 637. 52 114. 00 0. 0 _ 200. 00 0. 0 162,666.43 41.9 88, 291. 36 34. 5 47, 071. 12 _ 21.5 135, 362. 48 30. 5 41, 627. 92 1, 860. 20 6, 506. 40 195, 552. 08 17. 5 1, 139. 80 62. 0 4,193.60 60.8 1,1 :4 • 47 5'1 71 17 .13 74 7; FINANCE-FA484 _ TIME _ 14: 16:23 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM _12/01 L91TO12/31 L91 FUND OBJ. DESCRIPTION 001 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 1 EST REV MONTHLY REVYEAR _TO .DATE_ PAGE 0002 DATE 02/15/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE Y. _ 3400._USE_OF__MONEY__U_P_ROP_ERT_Y___ 3404 /COMM CTR LEASES 3405 /COMM CTR RENTALS 3406 /COMM_CTR THEATRE 3411 /OTHER FACILITIES 3412 /TENNIS COURTS _3414 /PROP__ A__ CONVERSION 3418 /SPECIAL EVENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3504 / I N LIEU OFF HIGHWAY 333. 00 O. 00 3505 /IN LIEU MOTOR _VEHICLE .688. 312. 00 45._935..13 3507 /HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE 4,000.00 0.00 3508 /MANDATED COSTS O. 00 16, 024. 00 16, 942. 00 3509 AHOMEOWNER_P_ROP_TX_ RELIE 66, 500..00_____ 9. 716 94 9, 716 94 3510 /POST 48, 700. 00 4, 529. 66 9, 773. 24 3511 /STC -SVC OFF TRAINING 8, 500. 00 O. 00 0. 00 3514 _ICIGARETTE IAX 36..790_00..__ 1. 552._13_ S, 124._12 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 853, 135.00 77, 757.86 364, 268. 31 90, 000. 00 52. 000. 00 30, 000. 00 26.000. 00 13, 000. 00 110, 000. 00 0 00 30, 000. 00 494. 50 601, 880. 00 98, 514. 73 6, 792. 00 50, 692. 90 39, 307. 10 5, 926. 00 31, 641. 00 20, 359. 00 4. 487. 75 22, 371. 65 .7, 628. 35 835. 00 12, 287. 75 13, 712. 25 2. 363. 25 7, 600. 00 5. 400. 00 58. 4 0..00..- 110, 000. 00 0 0 17. 608. 25 12, 391. 75 58. 6 192, 196. 07 409, 683. 93 31. 9 56. 3 60. 8 _74. 5___ 47. 2 166. 79 166. 21 316. 979. 41 371, 332. 59 2, 565. 81 1.434.19 3800 CURRENT_SERYICE CHARGES 3801 /RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION 3802 /SIGN REVIEW 3803 /ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 3805 /CONDTL USE PERMIT AMEND 3806 /BOARD OF APPEALS 3808 /ZONE VARIANCE_ REVIEW 3809 /TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW 3810 -/FINAL MAP REVIEW 3811_. LZONE_CHANGE-G P A 3812 /CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 3813 /PLAN CHECK FEES 3814 /PLANNING/ZONING APPEAI 3815 /PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES 3817 /SPECIAL CURB MARKING --__3818 /POLICE_SERVICES 3819 /JAIL SERVICES 3820 /TRUSTY ADMIN FEE 3821 IFINGERERINI._SERVICE 3P 1? :J 47 16, 942. 00- 56. 783. 06. 38, 926. 76 8. 500. 00 28, 665. 88 488, 866. 69 50. 0 46:0 _. 64. 1 0. 0 14. 20. 0 0. 0 22. 0 42. 6 !Ji • ;:, J I9 .J J 6 J J 9,000.00 459. 25 3.826.75 5.173.25 42. 5 4, 000. 00 418. 75 2,387.50 1.612.50 59. 6 7. 965..00 308._50 4, 841 50 3, 123 50___.__ 60._7_ 1, 650. 00 0. 00 3, 288. 50 1. 638. 50- 199. 3 300.00 0.00 0.00 300. 00 0.0 3.700 00 0 00 925 00 2. 775. 00 25. 0 0.00 0.00 962.25 962. 25- 0.0 4, 050. 00 235. 25 1,626.25 2,423.75 40. 1 2. 400 00 1..255 25 31_765..75____ 1, 365._75- ___.156. 9 _ 24, 000. 00 0. 00 3. 355. 00 20. 645. 00 13. 9 105, 000. 00 809. 47 46. 946. 86 58, 053. 14 44. 7 2, 132. 00 557 50 1, 926 75 205. 25 90.3 6 101 000. 00 161. 75 6, 298. 53 3, 701. 47 62. 9 420.00 0.00 0.00 420.00 0.0 23, 000_00 1, 013 60 6, 542 20 16, 457 80 28 4 10. 200. 00 1, 307. 50 8. 865. 00 1, 335. 00 86. 9 150.00 0.00 280.00 130. 00- 186.6 2, 000._ 00 212..50 1, 380 00 620. 00 69. 0 25, 000. 00 0. 00 14, 805. 00 10, 195. 00 59. 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O. 0 0, 80 00 21 00 72 50 7 50 9.0..6 3823 /SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY 3824 /VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES 3825 /P UBL IC__NOt_LC ELPOST.I NG 14 •J FINANCE-FA484 TIME 14:16:23 FUNT.) DESCRIPTIONOJIJ 001 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 2200 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3926 3827 3831 3234 3836 3337 3332 3839 3840 3841 3856 3857 3858 3859 3861' 3862 3863 3866 3867 3868 3869 3870 3871 3872 3873 3874 3875 3876 3877 3878 3893 38134 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES /LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT /STREET CUT INSPECTION /ENCROACHMENT PERMIT /FUMIGATION INSPECT FEE /RETURNED CHECK CHARGE . . /SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIO /PHOTOCOPY CHARGES /AMBULANCE TRANSPORT /POLICE TOWING /GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT _/PKG PLAN APPLICATION /TENANT REFUSE BILLING /REFUSE LIEN FEE /HAZARDOUS MAT PERMIT /ALARM PERMIT FEE /FALSE ALARM FEE /NONCONFORMING REMODELS /PRECISE DEVLMNT PLANS /PUBLIC NOTICING/300 FT /2ND PARTY RESPONSE /LEGAL DETERMINATION HRG /PARAMEDIC RESP/NON-TRSP /LOCK -OUT (CAR) EST REV 80, 000. 00 5. 075. 00 40, 000. 00 12. 000. 00 a, 000. 00 1, 000. 00 500. 00 1. 200. 00 9, 000. 00 26, 500. 00 0. 00 . 1, 840. 00 130. 00 500. 00 1, 500. 00 1. 800. 00 2. 000. 00 2, 680. 00 1, 145. 00 7. 975. 00 1, 500. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 240. 00 /LOCK -OUT (HOUSE) 190.00 /FLOODING WATER REMOVAL 174. 00 /SPRAY BOOTH. INSPECTION 900.00 /FIRE PROTECT/SYS EXIST° 210.00 /SPRINKLER CERT TEST 92.00 /COMML BLDG/APT INSPECT 1, 750. 00 /FINAL/TENT MAP EXTNSION 450. 00 /LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 515. 00 3890 /300 'RADIUS NOTCG/APL CC 920.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 445. 833. 00 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 /SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 8. 000. 00 3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 500.00 3903 /CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT 5. 000. 00 3904 /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 5, 000. 00 3909 /LATE FEE 0. 00 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN .1, 649, 655. 00 MONTHLY REV 100. 00 0. 00 71. 50- 1. 735. 40 718. 00 105. 00 3. 00 87. 75 2. 382. 30- 1. 753. 00 0.0 . 000 0 31. 50 6. 232. 33 YEAR TO DATE 23. 740. 50 0. 00 14. 062. 75 7. 669. 90 5, 456. 00 693. 00 322. 75 510. 55 4, 417. 80 18. 359. 50 0. 00 2; 802. 25 103. 50 7. 589. 02 0. 00 0. 00 157. 50 1, 470. 00 100. 00 1, 352. 50 0. 00 3, 442. 25 0. 00 5. 936. 00 434. 75 9. 813. 50 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 046. 00 30 891. 25 3, 891. 25 60. 00 180.00 0. 00 65. 00 0. 00 87. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 235. 25 0. 00 230. 00 19. 681. 25 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 370. 50 0. 00 1035. 00 227. 511. 86 5, 000. 00- 0. 00 4. 884. 38- 3, 313. 60 3. 921. 31 15. 465. 26 211. 07 393. 81- 8. 41 11. 69 137. 471. 25 824. 827. 50 PAGE 0003 PATE 02/15/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 56. 259. 50 5, 075. 00 25. 937. 25 4. 330. 10 2, 544. 00 307, 00 177. 25 689. 45 4, 582. 20 8. 140. 50 0. 00 962. 25- 26. 50 7. 089. 02- 1. 500. 00 330. 00 647. 50 762. 25- 4. 791. 00- 1. 838. 50- 1 500. 00 _ 1, 046. 00- 2, 891. 25- 60. 00 125. 00 87. 00 900 00 210. 00 92. 00 1. 750. 00 920. 50- 515. 00 115. 00- 218. 321. 14 8; 000. 00 2. 813. 60- _ _ 10. 465. 26-- 5. 393. 81 11. 69- E324. 827. 50 0. 0 29. 6 0.0 L'0 35.1 63.9 68.2 69.3 64.5 42.5 49. 0 69. 2 0. 0 • 0 152.2 79.6 1517.8 0.0 81.6 67.6 0) 128. 4 518. 4 123.0 0. 0 0. 0 389. 1 75. 0 34. 2 50. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 _ 0. 0 304. 5 0. 0 112. 5 .. 51. 0 0. 0 662. 7 309. 3 7. 8 0. 0 50. 0 1 0 FINANCE -F4484 TIME 14:16:23 FUND OB.! DESCRIPTION 001 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3900 OTHER REVENUE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL TOTALS I) • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM.12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 EST REV MONTHLY REVYEAR TO DATE 1,668,155.00 131,727.66 CO PAGE 0004 4111 DATE 02/15/92 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 843,224.24 824,930.76 10,686,298.00 1,874,779.42 _ 4,750,548.05 5,935,749.95 10, 686, 298. 00 1, 874, 779. 42 4, 750, 548. 05 #14 ;11Pri3t4t*fie. 11-11,::"414:941rgiEn•t4 Jr. 141.4.^: f • 4 4' ' '4 4, 4 4: 50.5 44.4 5, 935, 749. 95 44. 4 ° 0 • I ,0 • HO He e 1.! 0 0 0 • n., FINANCE —F4484 TIME .1.4:16:2 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 103 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 4,o CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0005 .,$) FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/15/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED 4 EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE % 3100 TAXES 3101 /CURRENT YEAR SECURED 179,637.00 72,506.30 72,506.30 107, 130. 70 40. 3 1. 3103 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 184,637.00 72,506.30 73,860.78 /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 5,000.00 0.00 1,354.48 3,645. 52 27.0 40 110,776.22 40.0 1 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 0 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 90, 785. 00 10, 824. 48— 24, 233. 31 66, 551. 69 26.6 .. OBJECT SUBTOTAL 90, 785. 00 10, 824. 46— 24, 233. 31 66, 551. 69 26. 6 3900 OTHER REVENUE 411 3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR O. 00 O. 00 6, 454. 02 6, 454. 02— 0. 0 3955 /OPERATING TRANSFERS IN O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 0, 0 .. 0 . OBJECT_SUBTOTAL O. 00 O. 00 --------------6,454. 02 6, 454. 02— O. 0 I • DEPT 0000 TOTALS 275, 422. 00 61, 681. 82 104, 548. 11 170, 873. 89 37.9 0 1 , • 275, 422. 00 FUND. TOTAL . .4) 61, 681. 82 104, 54e. 11 _ _ 170, 873. 89 37, 9 • 9, e FINANCE-FA484 TIME 14:16:28 , • ••• FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 109 VEHICLE PARKING DIST DEPARTMENT 0000 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 3400 USE OF. MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 3407 /PARKING LOT RENTAL 3409 VEHICLE PKG DIST/LOT B 3413 VEHICLE PKG DIST/VPD LEASE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3845 /VPD LOT PERMITS/DAILY 3846 /VPD LOT PERMITS/MONTHLY 3847 VEHICLE PKG DIST/VALIDATION STAMPS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 /OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 0.00 0.00 OBJECT,SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0.00 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 149,900.00 30,352.84 EST REV . MONTHLY REV.. YEAR TO DATE 1, 809. 00 15, 713. 00 22, 990. 00 69, 388. 00 109, 900. 00 8, 000. 00 10, 000. 00 22, 000. 00 40, 000. 00 PAGE 0006 • DATE 02/15/92 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED .0 BALANCE .0 951.26- 2,255.30 446.30- 124.6 1,304.10 6, 520. 50 9, 192. 50 41. 4 0 O. 00 0. 00 22, 990. 00 O. 0 30, 000. 00 91, 508. 10 22, 120. 10- 131. 8 30, 352. 84 100, 283. 90 9, 616. 10 91.2 0 0.00 148. 89 7, 851. 11 1. 8 411 O. 00 . 158. 40 9,841.60 1. 5 0. 00 340. 54 21, 659. 46 1. 5 O. 00 647. 83 39, 352. 17 1.6 FUND TOTAL 149,900-00 30,352.84_ 0.00 0.00 0.0 0. 00 O. 00 0. 0 100,931.73 4E1,968.27 67.3 'Q :a 100,931.73 .48,968.27 67.3 ; I ; •, •••••-r..e- :14;;L•+f! • , • • 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0007 40 TIME 14:16:23 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/15/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED Oi FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 1 110 PARKING FUND L. gc, DEPARTMENT 0000 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3302 /COURT FINES/PARKING OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 300. 000. 00 1, 300, 000. 00 _ . . 50, 740. 00 50, 740. 00 543, 898. 58 543, 898. 58 • * 756, 101. 42 41.8 756,101.42 41.8 I. 0 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 1 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 18,894.00 994.19- 2,345.58 16.548.42 12.4 0 3407 /PARKING LOT RENTAL 7,200.00 400.00 3,200.00, _ 4,000.00 44.4 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 26,094.00 594.19- 5,545.58 20,548.42 21.2 , 11 i 0 3800 CURRENT_SERVICE_CHARGES 3842 /PARKING METERS 758,000.00 13,077.49 347,207.21 410,792.79 45.8 '1 3843 /PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL 191,000.00 563.95 17,371.88 173,628.12 9.0 0 3844 /DAILY PARKING PERMITS 1,500.00 250.20- 1,146.25 353.75 76.4 -' 3848 /DRIVEWAY PERMITS 500.00 56.25 307.50 192.50 61.5 ^1 384'9 /GUEST PERMITS 600.00 82.30 523.50 76.50 87.2 .. 4) 3850 /CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS 1,000.00 84.00 772.00 228.00 77.2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 952,600.00 13,613.69 367,328.34 585,271.66 38.5 O .0 3900 OTHER_REVENUE 3955 /BUDGETED TRANSFERS IN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 O OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 a DEPT 0000 TOTALS 2.278,694.00 63.759.50 916,772.50 1,361,921.50 40.2 FUND TOTAL 2,278,694.00 63,759.50 916,772.50 1,261,921. 50 40.2 0 0 • ' • . 1110..! • I ml .,0 CD 0 • 01.1...) A) 49 4 9 • CITY OF HERM(JSA BEACH FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0008 0 1 f ME 14: 16: 23 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 _ _ DATE 02/15/92 .. 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED 0 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV. . _. MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE % 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY.PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 23, 584. 00 23, 584. 00 11, 614. 24- 20, 286. 67 11, 614. 24- 20, 886. 67 2. 697. 33 82. 5 2, 697. 33 88.5 K • • 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3501 /SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION 74, 165. 00 5, 187. 00 33, 897. 58 40, 267. 42 45. 7' 0 3502 /SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 155, 400. 00 .11, 277. 66 . 67, 469. 81-------87.930. 19 43. 4 3503 /SECT 2107. 5 ALLOCATION 4, 000. 00 O. 00 4, 000. 00 0. 00 100. 0 3512 /SECTION 2105 (PROP 111) 78, 080. 00 5, 256. 64 36, 521. 57 41, 558. 43 . 46.7 . . OBJECT SUBTOTAL 311, 645. 00 21, 721_30 .__ A41, 888. 96 169, 756. 04 45. 5 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 335, 229. 00 10, 107. 06 162, 775. 63 172, 453. 37 48! 5 44 FUND TOTAL 335, 229. 00 10, 107. 06 162, 775. 63 172, 453. 37 48. 5 :1;.1.0, • ,/,;,'4,114,1t)* `7 '+ 14, ';.44,4• 4.,,' +-• ...••••••., • ' • ‘" •••• '•• • `f • , • • 4 •• ' 0 0 ' 0 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FTNANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0009 • TINE 14:1,S:23 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/15/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED • FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION. EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7. 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 "ft 3400 USE OF MONEY_& PROPERTY • I 41 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 1,809.00 263.99- 417.52 1,391.46 23.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1,809.00 263.99- 417.52 1,391.48 23.0 DEPT 0000. TOTALS 1,809.00 263.99- 417.52 1,391.48 23.0 .. • FUND TOTAL 1,809.00 263.99- 417.52 1,391.48 23.0 • • • 0 0 0 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 0 rINANCE-FA404 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME 14:16:2p FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 1 125 PARR AND RECREATION FACILITIES FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 IP FP • 9 9 • • 2100 TAXES 3116 OBJECT SUBTOTAL . EST REV . MONTHLY REV__ YEAR TO DATE /PARK REC FACILITY TAX 7,000.00 7,000.00 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3, 500. 00 10, 500. 00 3, 500. 00 10, 500. 00 92,728.00 14,987.42- 31,173.48 92,728.00 14,987-42- 31,173.48._ 3900 OTHER REVENUE . 3910 _ /PARK/RECREATION IN LIEU 130,000.00 0.00 46,650.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 130,000.00 0.00 46,650.00 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 229,728.00 11,487.42- 88,323.48 FUND TOTAL 229,728.00 11,487.42- 88,323.48 PAGE 0010 b DATE 02/15/92 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 3,500.00- 150.0 3,500. 00- 150.0 . 61,554. 52 33.6 . St 61,554.52 . . 33-6 83, 350. 00 • 35. 8 83, 350. 00 35. 8 141, 404. 52 36 4 141,404. 52 38.4 • H 0 0 , • .t •4 ' ; tr ;:gfr '';. ' 1 • FINANCE-FA484 TIME 14: 16:23 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 126 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3120 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL /UTILITY USER TAX 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 33, 685. 00 2, 807. 08 16, 842. 48 16, 842. 52 49. 9 33, 685. 00 2, 807. 08 16, 842. 48 16. 842. 52 49. 9 DEPT. 0000 TOTALS 970, 639. 00 .72,029.10 464,224.38 506,414.62 47.8 . r FUND TOTAL or, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0011 0.7) FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/1:3/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV. YEAR TO DATE EALr',NCF 906,954.00 906,954.00 68,009.11 432, 618. 30 68, 009. 11 432, 618. 30 474, 335. 70 474, 335. 70 30,000.00 1,222.91 14,763.60 15,236.40 30,000.00 1,222.91 14, 763. 60 15, 236. 40 47.7 47.7 49.2 49.2 970. 639. 00 72,039.10 464,224.38 506,414.62 47.8 ." S i 1 I •• 0 7 V 0.! i•y F I NANCE—FA484 TIME 14: 16: 23 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 127 67. UTILITY USER TAX FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 2100 TAXES. 2120 OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0012 FROM 12/01/91. TO.12/31/91 DATE 02/15/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREAL I ZED EST REV, _ . MONTHLY REV..YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7. /UTILITY USER TAX 1, 360, 441. 00 1, 360, 441. 00 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 8, 375. 00 OBJECT. SUBT.OTA1 8, 375. 00 DEPT 0000 101, 961. 82 101, 961. 82 648, 875. 49 648, 875. 49 711, 565. 51 47. 6 711, 565. 51 47.6 683. 57— 1, 900. 88 6, 474. 12 22. 6 683. 57— 1, 900. 38. . , 6, 474. 12 _ _ . 22.6 _ TOTALS 1, 368, 816. 00 101, 278. 25 650, 776. 37 718, 039. 63 47. 5 FUND TOTAL 1, 368, 816.00 101, 278. 25 650, 776. 37 718, 039. 63 47. 5 • 0 • • • , ,„,„ . I „, i; • :1; Ati" r . .• t'1"! . , 0 • •• • 1;‘. ..;11 4 ',4,•;;;,$•:4; :141 Z,',0.4s. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA404 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0013 • TINE 14:16:22 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/15/92 50. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 2700 INTERGOVERNMENT/FEDERAL . . . .... _ 3713 /HOUSING REHABILITATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 3715 /CDBG ADMINISTRATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.0 . 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 ' it Lb FUND TOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 0 U CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-PA4S4 fIME 14:1:23 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0014 40 .FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/15/92 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION UNREALIZED EST REV . MONTHLY REV__ YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7. 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3117 /PROPOSITION A TRANSIT 3121 SUBREGNL INCENTIVE FUNDS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /.INTERESTINCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 210, 914. 00 0. 00 210, 914. 00 23, 182. 00 23, 182. 00 13, 405. 00 84, 669. 00 0. 00 0. 00 13, 405. 00 84, 669. 00 3, 077. 08- 3, 077. 08-- _ 7, 213. 01 7, 213. 01 126, 245. 00 0. 00 126, 245. 00 • 15, 968. 99 15, 968. 99 40.1 0.0 40.1 31.1 31.1 3800 CURRENT.SERVICE_CHARGES 3854 /FARES, DIAL A RIDE 11,500.00 0.00 3,549.13 7,950.87 30.8 3855 /BUS PASSES 6,000.00 518.00 2,570.00 3,430.00 42.8 OBJECT.SUBTOTAL 17,500.00 518.00 6,119.13 11,380.87 34.9 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0 00 O. 00 0 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.0 0.0 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 251,596.00 10,845.92 98, 001. 14 .153,594.86 38.9 FUND TOTAL 3 , ), 1 251,596.00 10,845.92 98,001.14 '•,•-• • • • 153, 594. 86 38. 9 " • •;') '‘,," • :4:4, ", ; Ttt,':';,j))) • , , , p4. . . • I,,, 40 o • 0 I , 0 1,, • ey CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FIHA!CE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) + PAGE 0015 • TINT= 14: 16: -'_? . FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 _ DATE 02/15/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE l uNO OBJ DESCRIPTION UNREALIZED EST REV _.MONTHLY REV__ YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 1D0 GRANT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 - - - - 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3517 /OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFET 40, 000. 00 0.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 40, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3700 IhJTERGOVERNhiEPJ-f/FEDERAL 3701 /FEDERAL AID URBAN 0.00 0.00 9,765.42- _ OBJECT- SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 9,765.42- 3900 ,765.42- 3900 OTHER REVENUE . 3902 --._-. /REFUNDS/REIMB._ PREVYR __...__ O. 00 ...---,--_ ._0.00 208.39-__ 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 9,766.00 0. 00 9,765.42 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 9,766.00 0. 00 9,557.03 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 49, 766.00 0. 00 208. 39 - FUND TOTAL_ I:0,(lil! 49, 766. 00 0. 00 40, 000. 00 40, 000. 00 9, 765. 42 9, 765.42_._. 208. 39 0. 58 208.97 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 • .0 • 0. 0 99. 9 97. 8 49, 974. 39 0.4 .• I. i,. 11/) 208. 39- 49, 974. 39 O. 4 • ID o G CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH F NANCE—PA4S4 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (13Y FUND) PAGE 0016 I I NE 14: 16: 23 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 a DATE 02/15/92 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREAL I ZED FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7. 155 CROSSING GUARD FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 1.. 3100 TAXES 3101 /CURRENT YEAR SECURED. 53, 953. 00 21, 765. 50 21, 765. 50 32, 187. 50 40. 3 3103 /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 5, 000. 00 0. 00 1, 161. 86 3, 838. 14 23. 2 ! • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 59, 953. 00 21, 765. 50 22, 927. 36 36, 025. 64 38. 0 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 2, 479. 00 492. 20— 1, 065. 24 1, 413. 76 42. 9 OBJECT SUBTOTAI 2, 479. 00 _ .. ... __ _ _492. 20— .1, 065. 24 . . _ 1, 413. 76 42. 9 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS. IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0. 00 _ _ 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 61, 432. 00 FUND TOTAL 61.432. 00 , • • ,1 • /14, 11•$ 1, • 'a '1, 21, 273. 30 .__ .. 23, 992. 60 21.27330_. 23, 992. 60 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 37, 439. 40 39. 0 ') 37, 439. 40 39. 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE -F A484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT ( BY FUND) PAGE 0017 TINE 14: 16:23 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 'DATE 02/15/92 50. 07. (JF YEAR COMPLETE, _. UNREAL I ZED FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE % 160 SEWER FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 _ /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 140, 298. 00 16,478. 20- 32, 154. 30 140, 298. 00 16, 478. 20- 32, 154. 30 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3602 /BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANC 4,000.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4, 000. 00 350. 00 600. 00 350. 00 600. 00 108, 143. 70 22. 9 108, 143. 70 22. 9 3, 400. 00 15. 0 3, 400. 00 15. 0 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3828 /SEWER CONNECTION FEE 18, 000. 00 342. 55 6, 034. 27 11, 965. 73 33. 5 . _ 3829 /SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 1, 400. 00 0. 00 915. 20 . 484. 80 65. 3 38:32 /SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN 1, 200. 00 157.00 993. 00- 2, 193. 00 82. 7 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 20, 600. 00 499. 55 5, 956. 47 14, 643. 53 28. 9 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 800, 000. 00 66, 666. 67 400, 000. 02 399, 999. 98 50. 0 ... _ .. OBJECT. SUB T 0 T AL rgoo, 000. 00 66, 666. 67 400, 000. 02 394, 999. 98,, _ . 50. 0 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 964, 898. 00 51, 038. 02 438, 710. 79 526, 187. 21 45. 4 FUND TOTAL 964, 898. 00 51, 038. 02 438, 710. 79 526,187.21 , 45.4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA404 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0018 TIME 14:11S:23 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/15/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 2300 FINES & FORFEITURES 2304 . _ /FORFEITED FUNDS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 400, 000. oo 1 eo, 808. 00 1, 686, 445. 84 400, 000. 00 180, 808. 00 1, 686, 445. 84 8, 509. 00 8, 509. 00 10,824.98- 10,824.98- • 19,204.93 19,204.93 1, 286. 445. 84- 1, 286. 445. 84- 10, 695. 93- 10, 695. 93- 421.6 421.6 225.7 225.7 2900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 /SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 0. 00 0. 00 5, 030. 00 5, 030. 00- 0. 0 3955 /OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 0. 00 20, 090. 00- 0. 00 . 0. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 20, 090. 00- 5, 030. 00 5. 030. 00- 0. 0 DEPT 0000 .TOTALS 402,509.00 149,893.02 _1,710,680.77 1,302,171. 77- 418.7. FUND TOTAL 408, 509. 00 149, 993. 02 1, 710, 680. 77 1, 302, 171. 77- 418.7 I , •) J J 0 0 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ‘-11:','.•_-,14 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0019 1 I. - 11 IC. A FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 ; DATE 02/15/92 0 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED n , 013J DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE % , 0 •, 1 11;1_ PROTECTION FUND F;-PARTNENT 0000 :3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY ,, 0 • 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 20,368.00 3,562.747. 8,199.23 12,168. 77 40.2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 20, 368. 00 3,562.74- 8,199.23 12,168.77 40.2 LO 3900 OTHER REVENUE . 3912 /FIRE FLOW FEE 100,000.00 4,281.67 31,064.25 68,935.75 31.0 M OBJECT SUBTOTAL 100,000.00 4,281.67 31,064.25 68,935.75 31.0 0 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 120,368.00 718.93 39,263.48 81,104. 52 22.6 ___... 1' , 0 FUND TOTAL 120,368.00 718.93 39,263.48 81,104. 52 '12.6 9 1 11.1 1 ' 1.1 0 0 0 0 0 F I NANCE—FA484 TIME 14:16:23 FUND O13J DESCRIPTION 305 CAPITAL_ IMPROVEMENT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 CITY OF HERMOSA REACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 2900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 _ ..../OPERATINO,.TRANSFERS.. IN_ OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL TOTALS EST REV 5, 776, 343. 00 5, 776, 343. 00 5,_776, 343. 00 5, 776, 343. 00 MONTHLY REV 2, 347, 743. 64 _. 2,347,743.64 2, 347, 743. 64 2, 347, 743. 64 YEAR TO DATE 4, 019, 880. 62 4, 019, 080. 62 4, 019, 880. 62 4, 019, 880. 62 1 Tr• i"c_,r .t.,J ti . i. .f i,4f� a PAGE 0020 DAl E 02/15/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 1, 756, 462. 38 1, 756, 462. 33 i, 756, 462. 38 1, 756, 462. 38 69.5 69. 5 69.5 69. 5 tr, 7 F I NANCE-FA484 TIME 14:16:23 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 PAGE 0021 DATE 02/15/92 .1) 50. 0% OF YEAR _C OMELETE ri t I 1 , - 1 ..1 FUND 013J DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE ."mmm,..... BALANCE % .---: 12 '-. 7 a 705 INSURANCE FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 /REFUNDS/RE I MB P REV YR 0 00 0 00 15, 546 0.00 600. 146. 146. 14 15, 546. 0. 597. 050. 050. 14- __. _ . 0. 0 _ ... 00 0.0 00 50. 0 86 _ 51. 7 --17 86 51. 7 '7 13 .5 '6 10 19 3955 OP ERAT I NG TRANSFERS IN 3957 /TRANSFER OBJECT SUBTOTAL IN -DEPT INS SVS 913. 913, 0.00 197. 00 197. 00 76, 76, 0.00 100. 00 100. 00 100. 00 456. 472, 472. 00 14 456, 441. 14, DEPT 0000' TOTALS ., 913, 197. 00 76. 14 441 i 15. 22o 22 133 23 FUND TOTAL 913. 197. 00 76, 100. 00 472, 146. 14 441, 050. 86 51 7 ' 20 I REPORT TOTALS 24, 842, 644. 00 4. 859, 859. 41 14. 041. 784. 92 10. 800, 859. 08 56., 5 25 27 241 29 „I 30 2.11 I 31 , 1 33 __ 34 271 2151 e;:' ”I 31 /.S- '13 9C/ 01 41 32 42 33 43 .11 351 ,le M 47 48 37 38 50 39 51 52 43 S S 41 42 C.5 55 43 A 5. 44 :13 45 59 45 50 47 43 61 34 49 75 50 55 51 67 , 53 54 '66 IC 71 ' 74 ,7...'l 75 ' 54 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1) F I NANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (I3Y FUND) PAGE 0001 TIME 11:48:36 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/14/92 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 7., • '; • FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND, ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % 0 001 GENERAL FUND 0000 ?, .] DEPT: _ 3903 CONTRI BUT I ONS _NON GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 .; • Ccoo 0. 00 0 00 . 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.0 DEPARTMENT TOTAL,, • 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0..0_ _ . - ,:'. • 1101 CITY COUNCIL DEPT: LEG ISLAT I VE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALAR I ES /M I SC 24/ 310. 00 2, 020. 62 11 # 998. 93 O. 00 12. 311. 07 49. ? ...10 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 352 00 0.00 0 00 O. 00 352. 00 0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN. 0 352. 00 641. 95 1• 303. 98 O. 00 951. 98- 370. 4 • 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 18. 000. 00 1p 500. 00 • 9. 000. 00 O. 00 9: 000. 00 50.0 .. • 4185 SOC IAL SECUR ITY( F I C A> 0,00 18. 60 111.60 0 00 111. 60- 0. 0 , ,, 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 209.00 17.41 104.41 0.00 104. 59 49. 9 OB JEC T SUB T OT AL 43s 223. 00 4. 198. 58 22, 518. 92 0.00 20, 704. 06 52.0 ::, • . ,,. . 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PR IVATE 9, 150. 00 0. 00 5, 149. 76 0. 00 4, 000. 24 56.2 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 90.50 00 0, 00 5, 149 76 0. 00 4, 000. 24 56. 2 . __ • 5.: • h 0 :IT 0 41 0 0 AN 53 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 300...00 15 18 101. 13 0, 00 198. 87 33. 7. . . 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 7, 500. 00 380. 90 2.11B.89 0. 00 5, 381, 11 28. 2 4315 MEMBERSHIP 6, 000. 00 0. 00 1/ 757. 00 0. 00 4, 243. 00 29.2 : • 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 2, 750. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 750. 00 0. 0 4319 SPECIAL EVENTS _ 500. 00 0. 00 167. 44 0. 00 332. 56 33. 4 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3, 198. 00 267. 00 1, 602. 00 0.00 1, 596. 00 50.0 0 20, 248. 00 663. 08 5, 746. 46 0. 00 14,.501. 54_ ___ _ _28. 3 0 DIVISION TOTAL 72, 621, 00 4, 861. 66 33, 415. 14 0. 00 39. 205. 86 460 ,_ 1121 CITY CLERK DEPT: LEGISLATIVE • • • 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALAR/ES/MISC 22, 608. 00 3, 629. 91 10, 211. 01 0. 00 12, 396. 99 45.1 0 - - _ :. 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 68. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 68. 00 0. 0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 68.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.00 0.0 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY . 25, 759. 00 1, 358. 00 14, 291. 38 0. 00 11, 467. 62 55.4 0 4185 SOCIAL_ SECURIT_Y(F_ I C. AI 0._00 O. 00 326130 ' 0. 00 326. 80- 0. 0 • • F I NANC E-FA454 T I NE 11: 48: 36 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1121 CITY CLERK • 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM .12/01/91 _TO 12/31/91 APPROPR I AT ION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4323 PUBLIC NOTICING 4396 TRSFR OUT-INS.USER_CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 678.00 52.08 321.24 49, 181. 00 5, 039. 99 25, 150. 43 • PAGE 0002 • DATE 02/14/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE YA • 7. • UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 356. 76 0. 00 24, 030. 57 47. 3 51. 1 26, 285. 00 3, 417. 00 • 3, 517. 00 0. 00 22, 768. 00 13.3 , • 26, 285 00 3, 417.00 3/.5/7, 00 0. 00 22, 768. 00 _ 13. 668 00 43. 89 337. 96__ O. 00 330. 04 2, 220. 00 173. 56 981. 36 0. 00 1, 238. 64 297. 00 0. 00 220. 00 0. 00 77. 00 1..012.00 0 00 0 00 0. 00 1, 012. 00 681. 00 258. 90 680. 90 0. 00 4 0. 10 10, 185. 00 466. 86 6, 603. 92 0. 00 3, 581. 08 1,B29..00_._152. 00 912. 00 0 00_ 917. 00 16, 892. 00 1, 095. 21 9, 736. 14 0. 00 7, 155. 86 5400. EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 1, 400. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 400. 00 1 r OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 400. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 400. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 1122 ELECTIONS • 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 93, 758. 00 9, 552. 20 DEPT: LEG I SLAT I VE 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 1, 100. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 100. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 23, 319. 00 4251 CONTRACT_SERVICE/GOVT 2, 181..00 , ! OBJECT 'SUBTOTAL 25, 500. 00 _4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE ') 1 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4316 _TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE • OBJECT SUBTOTAL ▪ 1-1 IF)1 38,403.57 0. 00 55,354.43 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 819. 15 1, 583. 02- 2, 180. 85 _2, 180. 85 3, 000. 00 597. 83 • 50. 5 __1••'' 44. 2 74.0 • 99. 9 64. 8 49. 8._ 57.6 0. 0 0. 0 40. 9 a •, ' 1 1, 100. 00 0. 0 1, 100. 00 0.0 0. 00 24, 902. 02 6. 7 . • 0. 00 0.15 99. 9 0. 00 24, 902. 17 2. 3 72.00 0.00 3.35 0.00 68.65 4. 6 1, 331. 00 11.60 1, 321. 26 0. 00 9. 14 99.3 i.f 1, 287. 00 0. 00 ----------..0..0o 0. 00 - 1, 287, 00 0. 0 660.00 258.90 428.90 0.00 231. 10 64.9 3, 350. 00 70.502 1, 754. 11 0. 00 1, 595. 89 52. 3 ..1 el) rIwAwcs-rA454 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE ____- TIME ����a�o�SUMMARY REPORT TO n�(BY FUND) f PAGE 0003 NN /91 ^I _____ ____________ .... ___' DATE 02/14/92 FUND DIV OBJT ��n ._�. � OF YEAR oo�Lsrs|� . APPROPRIATION ______ ______. MONTHLY . EXP_____ YTD EXPND,________.___ ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % , ' r� ; 001 GENERAL FUND ---'- '--- '---------------- ---' -------'_-' /` N`DIVISION TOTAL ' ��� /"1 1 ' a' 351. sw0. 00 275913ma -----'� RN- ~~`'--'LEG I SL*uvE____ !.�N� 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES --- -- '_--r' -�'�4201 ���T�YIoE�nm�E 1:�0�.um10, 669. 03�.o�.�0.� ''�' OBJECT SUBTOTAL � -------. 10, 669. 03' s�'��� �� « � . 60, 542.mo 0. 00 5v.457. 98 5x* ''_-4ouoMATER zALa/soppL Iso/oT*sn 4304 TELEPHONE rsLsp*owE �---------------' �_- «oon OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ' 200. 00 �p�ro' ------�o��a� ---------��-��---------_-_ _ _ __-__ _OBJECT - -' 325. 00 2. 90 '��� -- 0. 00 71. 15 64.4 2� - SUBTOTAL 52o.00 22. 63 ,^4 59 0. 00 �o���� 10 9 :�� ��-^_---__--_-_--/^nm oao 56 31-3 �J DIVISION TO, 10.e91./66' .�NN 6 1132 czry PROSECUTOR DEPT: LEG zoLArzvs ----- -^---~~------------"-»o'----5p'a1a.o4 -_-5o.o-/ PERSONAL SERVICES --__- /�/ ; 4112 IAmv 0. 00 ' SUBTOTALOBJECT no'm.om �oo 0. 00 uou o�m /^`~ •- l|. O. �'----_--on ---------'o 00 ---_v�v__�1 . 4201 CONTRACTSERVICE/PRIVATE4u»o CONTRACT SERVICES /|___an.00�om 0. 00 e^1arnm 0. 56, 816. 9.a�1 OBJ NN� ECSUBTOTAL 6u.00�oo 0. 00 e^1o�5w x �san-_-~ `�� 1 ��"^��_~._ES/OTHER-- .'mm 5. / -.~- .~�=,"""= 200.00 0. -- -----'---- '�- 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 831. 00 69. 00 0. 00 0. 00 200. 00 0. 0 DIVISION ToTAL__ -__�------ - 6 4' oo _'--_----------'-�-_69. 00 414. 00 ---_-'-u.0o_--_-_-�_'-----------------a1roo 40 .1 69, 00 6.601. 50 n^00 ^7'433.5v 1o.o . • p `. 1141 C-_, TREASURER DEPT: LEG IyLAT I VE/ 4. --- ------ [ a 1.^.�,4100 PERSONAL SERVICES /-| ° _^=" REGULAR OVERT zns*1uo REGULAR aALAnzso/mzao 250 00 31, 2, 574oo 15' u«4� oo 0. 00 15.r5�oo 4�o ' e�|� *110 VACATION/SICK PAY m=F454. 00 o om o*o. 0. 00 -p ra 96 0 ^' 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN ` 454oo n om0. 00 0. 00 454ooo u| - --*112 pAnrTzMs/rsMpon*nY'1z`144um o oo 419. 51 0. 00 34 49 92 « : •`*1eo SOCIAL osooez�v/r z o.�� o mo�` eao 00 7o 572. 0. 00 -�'572oo no 0w,!o om 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS ,,,=^. SUBTOTAL om. 62 341. 86 0. 00 317. 14 51.8 •_ 891. 55 3, I '-- /• P;/ �-------/ � NN FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:48:.3¢ FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1141 CITY TREASURER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01/91 __. TO 12/31/91_ APPROPRIATION PAGE 0004 DATE 02/14/92 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY. EXPYTD .EXPNDENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4200 CONTRACT.. SERVICES.-....___._._____._ 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 000. 00 2, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 45. 28 45. 28 0. 00 1, 954. 72 2. 2 0. 00 1, 954. 72 2. 2 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 840. 00 50.74 298.27 0.00 4305 OFFICE OPER_ SUPPLIES _____ _____1r.545.00 134.90 - 836.87__ __________ ._.0.00 4315 MEMBERSHIP 185.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4316 TRAINING 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4317 CONFERENCE_ EXPENSE 500.00..__.__.__ .. 0.00 0 00 0 00.. 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 1, 571. 00 131.00 786. 00 O. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4, 891. 00 316. 64 1, 921. 14 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 54, 948. 00 435, 837. 00 1201 CITY_MANAGER__._-_._._._ �__...DEP.T:_-_MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4, 208. 26 25, 884. 03 32, 653. 28 167, 362. 64 541. 73 708. 13 185. 00 250. 00 500. 00 785. 00 2, 969. 86 35. 5 54. 1 .. _ 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 50. 0 39. 2 0. 00 29', 063. 97 47. 1 0. 00 268, 474. 36 38. 4 4102 REGULAR._ SALARIES/_MISC 96, 222._00 6, 506. 60..__48, 446..74 0 00 47,_775. 26. __ 50. 3 ._ 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 13, 399. 00 O. 00 .13, 399. 10 0. 00 O. 10- 100. 0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3, 139. 00 641. 75 3, 138. 22 0. 00 0. 78 99. 9 _4112 PART_TIME/TEMPORARY_.__._____ 3, 640.-00 0 00 _______ 0. 00__ O. 00 _.3, 640. 00 .._....__.._.. 0. 0 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY (F I C A) 42. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 42. 00 0. 0 4189 MEDICARE_ BENEFITS 1, 242. 00 61. 50 735. 01 0. 00 506. 99 59. 1 .OBJECT._.SUBTOTAL_ 117, 684 _00 _7,.209 85 _65, 719 07 0 00 54,564. 93 55. 8 __ 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ..4201 CONTRACT. SERVICE/PRIVATE___-_ _205...00____ 11..00 ___ -131__31.__-__.____-__._.0._00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 205.00 11.00 131.31 0.00 4300 _MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE. 500. 00 39.78 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1, 750. 00 31.78 4310 MOTOR..FUELS AND__LUBES_____ 0..00.__.____. ._ 0.00 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE O. 00 0. 00 4315 MEMBERSHIP 725.00 0.00 4316 TRAINING. _.__.----..__-------------_- 3, 500. 00..__�----.--- O. 00 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 2, 300. 00 122. 23 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 5,012.00 418.00 _.__ OBJECT_ SUBTOTAL_ ______.._ 13,.-787..00.- _____ 611.-79 _ _.73. 69 .. _ _. 64. 0 . _ .. 73. 69 64. 0 254.63 0.00 245.37 50.9 885.09 0.00 864.91 50. 5 --_0. 00 -- -.0. 00. 0. 00 - --- 0. 0 - -. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 615. 00 . 0. 00 110. 00 84. 8 0. 00 0 00 ----_._-_ 3, 500. 00 _ _ 0. 0 _.._- 308. 70 0. 00 1, 991.30 13. 4 2, 508. 00 0. 00 2, 504. 00 50. 0 4, 571._42__ 0._00__9, 215. 58 _.__.___33. 1 .._ 0011111,131 F 1:P1- 11 4f.; r_m1.11. OFSCP tl" VAL FUND • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 0005 DATE 02/14/92 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE , • MONTHLY _EXP.. YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE APPROPRIATION DIVISION TOTAL 131, 676. 00 7, 832. 64 70, 421. 80 0. 00 61, 254. 20 33. 4 I F INANCE ADMIN DEPT; MGMT/SUPPORT fr 1 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC :111 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 228, 861. 00 5, 500. 00 17, 190. 00 334. 13 106, 045. 63 3, 377. 55 0. 00 122, 815. 37 46. 3 0.00 2, 122. 45 f." 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 1, 212. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 212. 00 61. 4 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 0. 0 5, 590. 00 456. 00 ' 5, 589. 16 0. 00 0. 84 99. 9 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 .. Al- I 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.0 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1, 368. 00 97.28 615.09 0.00 752. 92 44.9 :I OBJECT SUBTOTAL 242, 531. 00 18, 077. 41 115, 627. 42 0. 00 126, 903. 58 47.6 -, . _4200_CONTRACT_ SERVICES zi.. 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE _ _ / '• 39, 995. 00 4, 102. 00 24, 174. 56 0. 00 15, 820. 44 60. 4 "I _ _ OBJECT SUBTOTAL 39, 995. 00 4, 102. 00 24, 174. 56 0. 00 15, 820. 44 60.4 AD 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ' I 1 _ , 4304 TELEPHONE 2, 500. 00 - 134. 61 953. 57 0. 00 1, 546. 43 38. 1 4305 OFFICE .OPER_SUPPLIES _10, 600. 00 689. 51 5, 067. 06 0 00 5, 532. 94 . 47. 8 _ ,' 9 •, 4316 TRAINING 4315 MEMBERSHIP 230.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 72.0 :• 3, 652. 00 924. 94 0. 00 70. 00 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 850. 00 428. 90 33. 45 2, 727. 06 25. 3 l'ILL I 701. 90 0. 00 148. 10 82. 5 ! .. 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 8, 090. 00 674. 00 4, 044. 00 0.00 4, 046. 00 49.9 .,. 25, 942. 00 1, 960. 47 11, 871,47 0. 00 14, 070. 53 ri DIt./SION TOTAL 308, 468. 00 24, 139. 88 151, 673. 45 0. 00 156, 794. 55 49. 1 ;- • .- . I. 1203 PERSONNEL DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT I ;,111 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES ..1 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 62, 640. 00 5, 086. 52 30, 868. 25 0.00 31, 771. 75 49. 2 ' I I " 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 117. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00117.00 0.0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1, 737. 00 0.00 1, 736. 06 0.00 0.94 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 1, 000. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1, 000. 00 99. 9 ) 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 226. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 226.00 0. 0 I, 0. 0 _____ .4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL _ 53. 00-- 0.88 2. 57 0. 00 50. 43 _ . 4. 8 • I- 65, 773. 00 5, OB7. 40 32, 606. 88 0. 00 33, 166. 12 49. 5 .! ._4200. CONTRACT SERVICES II ' • I ' ‘ 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 31, 640. 00 6, 279. 35 14, 692. 92 0. 00 16, 947. 08 46. 4 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT • 2, 000. 00 0. 00 375. 00 0. 00 1, 625. 00 18.7 • • OBJECT. SUBTOTAI 33, 640. 00 279.35 15, 067. 92 0. 00 18.572. 08____. 44..7 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0006 vb TIME 11: 49: 36 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/14/92 _ 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR .APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP_ YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 1203 PERSONNEL DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATER I ALS /SUPPL I ES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 1, 000. 00 93. 81 652. 33 O. 00 347. 67 65. 2 ! 1 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 7, 000. 00 442. 13 2, 805. 84 O. 00 4, 194. 16 40. 0 4315 MEMBERSHIP 600. 00 O. 00 495. 00 O. 00 105. 00 62. 5 , • I j ' J - 4316 TRAINING 2, 700. 00 50. 00 880. 84 ' O. 00 1, 819. 16 32.6 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 750. 00 0.00 . 639.00 O. 00 111.00 85.2 l,.! * 4320 MEDICAL EXAMS 11, 000. 00 0 00 2, 086. 00 0 00 8, 914. 00 18.9 4327 AGMD INCENTIVES 1, 200. 00 160. 00 600. 00 0.00 600. 00 50.0 I _1 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 2, 034. 00 169. 00 1, 014. 00 O. 00 1, 020. 00 49.8 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 26,294_00. 914.94 9, 173. 01 .0-00 17, 110. 99 34.8 ..., : ..1 DIVISION TOTAL 125, 697 00 12, 281. 69 56, 847_81 0 00 68, 849. 19 45. 2 -, - .. I I._ 1205 CABLE TV DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 13, 264. 00 1, 190. 64 5, 932. 92 O. 00 7, 331. 08 44.7 ".1•11) .4110 _VACATION/SICK PAY OFE 228_00 O. 00 _O. 00 0 00 228. 00 O. 0........ :',I 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 228.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 228.00 0.0 I.,:j 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 1, 344. 00 129.50 623.00 0.00 721.00 46.3 1, , ip A185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F_ I_C_A) 83_ 00 8 03_ ___ 38. 61 0 00 44.39 46. 5 ,.,1 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 240. 00 19. 15 77. 32 O. 00 162. 68 32. 2 11 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 15, 387. 00 1, 347. 32 6, 671. 85 O. 00 8, 715. 15 43.3 L. t 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 5, 000. 00 164. 00 656. 00 O. 00 4, 344'. 00 13.1 OBJECT SUBTOTALI '.! 5, 000. 00 A64 00 656 00 0 00 _A , 344, 00 13. 1 _____ . -.. . , 4300 MATER I ALS/SUPPL IES/OTHER •..:; . 4305 OFFICE. OPER SUPPLIES 700. 00 O. 36 139. 96 .0 00 . 560. 04 19.9 , I 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 1, 000. 00 O. 0 i • 4315 MEMBERSHIP 400. 00 O. 00 420. 00 O. 00 20. 00- 105. 0 4316 TRAINING ____.35O.00 ....0.00 69. 00_ O. 00 _ 281. 00. 19. 7 !., 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 500.00 0.00 421.42 0.00 78. 58 84. 2 L'I 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 956.00 80. 00 480.00 0.00 476.00 50.2 I. .• 'II OBJECT. SUBTOTAL 3, 906_00 .80. 36 1, 530. 38 0 00 _ 2, 375. 62 39. 1 • i r . ! ' a DIVISION _TOTAL '' 24, 293. 00 1, 591.68 _8vE158,23 0 00__ . _15, 434.77. 36. 4 4!. 1206 DATA PROCESSING DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT ? I I 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALAR I ES /M ISC 82, 538. 00 6, 553. 44 39, 950. 76 O. 00 42,587.24 48. 4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 47 FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME 11: 48: 36 PAGE 0007 10 1 , i FROML12/01/91TO _12/31/91 DATE 02/14/92 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE P . .1, !-10 FUND DIV O!3 -JT DESCR ! ; APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPNO. _ .... _ ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % 001 GENERAL FUND , 1) 9 1207 BUS LICENSE 0' 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1206 DATA PROCESSING DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL_ SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500. 00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 1, 203. 00 _ 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1, 439. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 85, 680. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER II 4304 TELEPHONEJ , 3, 700. 00 363. 35 2, 140. 35 0.00 1, 559. 65 57.8 :41k 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 6, 500, 00_j,900. 96 3, 071. 59 400. 62 3, 027. 79 !, 1 W 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 300. 00 4313 MEMBERSHIP 0.00 0.00 O. 00 300. 00 O. 0 ' '1 4316 TRAINING 620. 00 160.00 0.00 O. 00 490. 00 O. 00 0. 00 ' 130. 00 79. 0 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE O. 00 _ 160. 00 O. 0 800. 00 0.00 519.60 0.00 281. 40 64. 8 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 3, 107. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 259. 00 1, 554. 00 0. 00 1, 553. 00 50. 0 15, 187, 00 __,2,523, 31 7, 774. 54 400. 62 7, 011. 84 53. 8 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 438. 43 1, 438. 43 7, 991. 87 41, 389. 19 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 500. 00 1, 203. 00 0. 57 44, 290. 81 68, 528. 00 1, 968. 17 32, 064. 49 1, 282. 50 35, 181. 01 68, 528. 00 1, 968. 17 32, 064. 49 1, 282. 50 35, 181. 01 O. 0 O. 0 99. 9 48.3 48.6 ..; 48.6 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 135, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 0. 00 135, 000. 00 0. 0 135, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 135, 000. 00 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 304, 395. 00 12, 483. 35 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 81, 228. 22 1,683.12 221,483.66 27. 2 i 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC: 0 • 83. 977.00 6, 884. 74 41, 049. 40 0.00 42, 827. 60 48. 9 -! O. 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 525 00 0 00 O.0.00 0. 00 525. 00 0. 0 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1, 239. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 1, 238. 00 0.0 , • ; - 1, 238. 00 639. eo _639.8O 0. 00 598. 20 4185 SOC IAL SECURITY(F I C A) 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 OBJECT _ SUBTOTAL 393. 00 33 44 198. o. oo 194. 33 50. 5 ,„ • _ 87, 271, 00 _7,557. 98 41,997. 87 0. 00 45, 383. 13 47. 9 1.1 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE , • • 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 25. 00 0. 00 19. 60 O. 00 5. 40 78. 4 _ _ 170.00 0.00 38.48 0. 00 131. 52 22.6 Di OBJECT SUBTOTAL 195. 00 0. 00 58. 08 0. 00 136. 92 29. 7 • , CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (13Y FUND) PAGE 0008 lb TIME 11: 48: 36 _FROM_ 12/01/91.... TO 12/31/91_ DATE 02/14/92 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE :1 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTI-FLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % 0 001 GENERAL FUND ,! r ' Ili 1207 BUS LICENSE DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT• M 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER -- 4304 TELEPHONE 520. 00 42. 44 295. 48 0. 00 224. 52 56. 8 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4, 600. 00 74. 35 1, 656. 46 . 0. 00 2, 943. 54 36. 0 • 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 165. 00 ------------------0.00 64. 50 0. 00 100. 50 39.0 4311 AUTO MA I NTENANCE 110.00 4.00 56.95 0.00 53.05 51.7 4315 MEMBERSHIP 50.00 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.0 4316 TRAINING ; 1, 366. 00 313. 00 779. 39 .0. 00 586. 61 57.0 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 500.00 0.00 357.93 0.00 142.07 71 5 ----- . 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 4, 695. 00 391. 00 2, 346. 00 0. 00 2, 349. 00 49. 9 :., * OBJECT_SUBTOTAL 12, 006._00 824. 79 5. 556_71 .0. 00 6, 449. 29 46. 2 ------ 5400 EQUIPMENT . - • 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN.. $500 ________ 230. 00 0. 00 229. 49___.__O. 00 O. 51 99. 7 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 230. 00 0. 00 229. 49 0. 00 0. 51 99. 7 ,. .d• DIVISION TOTAL 99, 702. 00 8, 382. 77 47, 732. 15 1208 MMT/SUPPORT 0. 00 51. 969. 85 47.8 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES • , 4102 REGULAR_SALARIES/MISC 28, 804. 00 2, 335. 00 _ _...13.918. 00 0 00 14, 886. 00 48. 3_ 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 421.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 421.00 0.0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 421.00 135.51 135. 51 0.00 285.49 32. 1 . . 4185. SOC IAL_ SECURITY (E_I__C_ A) •O. 00 0 00 0. 00 O. 00 0.00 0. 0 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 407. 00 35. 82 203. 77 0. 00 203, 23 50.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 30, 053. 00 2, 506. 33 14, 257. 28 0. 00 15, 795. 72 47. 4 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ... I 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 26, 000. 00 2, 800. 65 9, 345. 35 0. 00 16, 654. 65 35.9 .., 4 OBJECT_ SUBTOTAL 26, 000. 00 2, 800. 65 9,_ 345_35_ _O. 00 16, 654. 65 35. 9 I , ., 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 286 00 21. 64...._..143. 90 0 00 50. 3 ._ ' 4305 OFF ECE OF/ER SUPPLIES 350. 00 3, 213. 60- 24, 675. 40- O. 00 142. 10 25, 025. 40 7050. 1 4316 TRAINING 200. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 200. 00 0. 0 116 • _ ...4396 ..TRSFR OUT -INS .U.SER_ CHGS 888. 00 74. 00 _ 444. 00 . O. 00 444. 00 _ _ . 50. 0 • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 724. 00 3, 117. 96- 24, 087. 50- 0. 00 25, 811. 50 1397.1 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 o. oo o. 00 2. 10 0. 00 2. 10- 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0.00 2. 10 0. 00 2. 10- 0. 0 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (8Y FUND) PAGE 0009 41 TIME 11:48:236 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/14/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE .0 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE is 001 GENERAL FUND 41 1208 GEN APPROP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT • 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 - e DIVISION TOTAL 57, 777. 00 2, 189. 02 482. 77— 0. 00 58, 259. 77 O. 8 • 0 1212 EMP BENEFITS DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 695,000.00 56,698.68 320,947./8 0.00 374,052.82 46.1 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 695,000.00 56,698.68 320,947.18 0.00 374,052.82 46.1 :ft r DIVISION TOTAL 695, 000. 00 56, 698. 68 320, 947. le 0. 00 344i 052. 82 46.1 It) 1213 RETIREMENT DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT _____4100_PERSONAL_SERVICES 4180 RETIREMENT 1, 18e, 368. 00 97, 114. 30 485, 492. 81 O. 00 702, 875. 19 40. 8 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 188, 368. 00 97, 114. 30 485, 492. 81 O. 00 702, 875. 19 40.8 17: 41 • 1-•, 0, • DIVISION TOTAL 1, 188, 368. 00 97, 114. 30 485, 492. 81 0. 00 702, 875. 19 40.8 t2 1214 PROSP EXP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT ' 4300 MATER I ALS/SUPPL IES /OTHER i.. 2. 4322 UNCLASSIFIED 108, 574. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 108, 574. 00 0.0 0 3:1 4397 3.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS 369, 849. 00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 369, 849. 00— 0. 0 . 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 261, 275. 00— O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 261, 275. 00— O. 0 41 DIVISION TOTAL 261, 275. 00— O. 00 0.00 0.00 261, 275. 00— O. 0 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT IP • /01 • 4 e : 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPL IES /OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 611, 076. 00 489, 174. 27 555, 321. 35 0. 00 55, 754. 65 90.8 OBJECT SUBTOTAL _..61.1...076. 00 489, 174, 27 355, 321, 35 0. 00 55, 754. 65 90. 8 DIVISION TOTAL_ 611, 076. 00_ _489,174. 27.__555. 321. 35_ _55, 754. 65 90. 8 A FINANCE-FA45f3 TIME_ 11:48:36 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2101 POLICE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0010 1 FROM _ 12/01/91. TO 12/31/91 _ DATE 02/14/92 _ 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE 1 •} ' I .APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP _____.. YTD.EXPND. __._...._. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 3, 285, 177. 00 711, 888. 28 DEP.TL__P_OLICE 1, 778, 040. 23 1, 683. 12 1, 505, 453. 65 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC________569, 847..00 48, 016. 50 _ 272. 887. 10 O. 00._._. . 296, 959. 90.. __ 47. 8 4103 REGULAR . SALARIES/SAFETY 1, 743, 364. 00 129, 168. 72 836, 612. 22 O. 00 906, 751. 78 47. 9 4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 25, 200. 00 1, 880. 00 12, 380. 00 O. 00 12, 820. 00 49. 1 4106 REGULAR _OVERTIME 59, 000. 00_.17, 175. 04 40, 441._13. 0 00__________. 18, 558. 87 .. 68. 5 4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 100, 800. 00 4, 229. 98 45, 105. 42 O. 00 55, 694. 58 44. 7 4109 COURT TIME 20, 000. 00 1, 071. 04 6, 969. 17 O. 00 13, 030. 83 34. 8 4110. VACAT..ION/SICK_PAY_ ..OFF —_.___ 17, 600. 00 _____.___ O. 00____...__.10, 112. 39 _—_ O. 00_ _______... 7, 487. 61 57. 4 i 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 50, 552. 00 3, 349. 26 29, 096. 40 O. 00 21, 455. 60 .57.5 I 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 7, 800. 00 553. 00 3. 402. 00 O. 00 4, 398. 00 43. b j<,i Alo _ _ 4114 POLICE _RESERVES 16,_000. 00_.__—___—_1, 947. 00 ____.____8, 078. 00__ —._____.0..00.___.__.__._._.7, 922. 00 50. 4 _......:':I 4115 EXTRA TIME O. 00 O. 00 6, 077. 65 O. 00 6, 077. 65- 0. 0 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 9, 065. 00 638. 58 ' 3, 839. 24 O. 00 5, 225. 76 42. 3 4118. FIELD_ TRAINING_OFFICER_ 5, 000..00_. 287 64.______1, 157. 14 0 00 3, 842. 86 .__ 23.1 _. 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY (F I C A) 1, 294. 00 155. 01 814. 07 0. 00 479. 93 62. 9 4187 UNIFORMS 38, 500. 00 2, 216. 45 15, 574. 26 293. 40 22, 632. 34 41. 2 4189 MEDICARE _BENEFITS 14,.980. 00.____.____.1, 367. 15_________._..8, 839_46.____—_______ O. 00 ________ _..6, 140. 54 _ 59. 0..... . OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 679, 002. 00 212, 055. 37 1, 301, 385. 65 293. 40 1, 377, 322. 95 48. 5 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES_ 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE_/PRIVATE 116, 923. 00 3, 424. 07 58, 195. 09 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 32, 851. 00 383. 76 4, 829. 32 OBJECT SUBTOTAL _149, 774..00 3, 807. 83 63, 024. 41 0. 00 58, 727. 91 49. 7 0. 00 28, 021.68 14. 7 0 00_._ 86, 749. 59.__ __._ .42. 0 . 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 206..00__ .__99.44.205._96 0 00._. 0.04.__._..__99.9____ 4304 TELEPHONE 28, 000. 00 2, 022. 64 13, 307. 99 287. 20 14, 404. 81 48. 5 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 57, 900. 00 2, 528. 17 21, 146. 02 8, 840. 94 27, 913. 04 51. 7 4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE. 10, 668. 00. ___..._._754. 02 --___.4, 291..34. 173..54 6, 203. 07 ____. ___.. 41. 8 ___ 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 9, 112. 00 188. 00 2, 085. 62 4, 354. 19 2, 672. 19 70. 6 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 7, 500. 00 822. 69 3, 972. 23 729. 04 2, 798. 73 62. 6 ___ _____4310_ MOTOR _FUEI_S_AND__LUBES______21, 175. 00..__2, 09B. 07 _.11..134.25..__ O. 00______10, 040. 75.____,.___ . 52. 5________ 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 32, 000. 00 2, 550. 56 16, 776. 02 85. 50 15, 138. 48 52.6 I 4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 17, 575. 00 1, 382. 18 8, 835. 18 O. 00 8, 739. 82 50. 2 I ! 1. 4313_ TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC 8, 500. 00 _._____ O. 00..___ ___._1, 402. 09 0 00.__7, 097..91 _ .___. 16. 4 ___. 4315 MEMBERSHIP 1, 454. 00 O. 00 235. 00 O. 00 1, 219. 00 16. 1 4316 TRAINING 9, 000. 00 563. 89 4, 046. 56 O. 00 4, 953. 44 44.9 . a .4317. CONFERENCE EXPENSE 3, 500. 00___ .0. 00.._.___445. 71 _ O. 00____—_3, 054. 29_.._____ .12. 7 _._._..._ 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 402, 998. 00 33, 583. 00 201, 498. 00 O. 00 201, 500. 00 49. 9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 609, 588. 00 46, 592. 66 289, 381. 97 14, 470. 46 305, 735. 57 49. 8 I• . 1Mb 1•I • I" ,4 � PD FINANCE—FA454 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0011 e TIME 11:45:36_ FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91DATE 02/14/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE T. O FUND DIV OBJT DESCR - 001 GENERAL FUND 2101 POLICE APPROPRIATION DEPT: POLICE 5400 EQUIPMENT --- ---_ 5401 EQUIPMENT—LESS EQUIPMENT—LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT—MORE THAN $500 . 5403 VEHICLES. OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900-. LEASE_ PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2201 FIRE MONTHLY . EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE is 10, 603. 00 0. 00 10,204.35 0. 00 398.65 96. 2 41, 893. 00 568. 31 16, 289. 37 18, 375. 30 7,228.33 82.7 0 9,984.00 _._._._0.00 0.00._ ,_-_ 0. 00 ,_ _ _- -_ 9,984.00 0. 0 --._._.._._.. 62_, 480. 00 568. 31 26, 493. 72 18, 375. 30 17, 610. 98 71. 8 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 159, 766. 00 159, 766. 00 3, 660, 610. 00 10, 720. 44 48, 221. 33 10, 720. 44 48, 221. 33 273, 744. 61 1, 728, 507. 08 3, 660, 610. 00 DEPT: FIRE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC__,_____ 47, .3, 871. 50. ______2, 655. 002655, 00.__— O. 00 .. _. _ 24, 410. 00 -_ _ 48. 1 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 945, 721. 00 72, 166. 65 460, 688. 39 - O. 00 485, 032. 61 48. 7 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 106, 500. 00 O. 00 80, 574. 41 O. 00 25, 925. 59 75. 6 . 4108 FLSA_OVERTIME 65, 678. 00 6,079. 68 43, 997. 70 0. 00 21, 680. 30 66. 9 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 14, 864. 00 0. 00 O. 00 O. 00 14, 864. 00 0. 0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 14, 864. 00 0. 00 10, 759. 24 0. 00 4, 104. 76 72. 3 . 4119 FITNESS_INCENTIVE6,.000. 00 0. 00 4, 150. 00 _ O. 00 1,850. 00 -. 69. 1 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 4187 UNIFORMS 21, 726. 00 450. 00 2, 758. 46 11, 969. 14 6, 998. 40 67. 7 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 3, 599. 00 349.60. 2, 065. 94 0. 00 1,533. 06 ___ 57._4.__ OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 226, 017. 00 82, 917. 43 627, 649. 14 11, 969. 14 586, 398. 72 52. 1 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 27, 566. 00 922. 40 1.7, 549. 17 O. 00 10, 016. 83 63. 6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 27, 566. 00 922. 40 17, 549. 17 O. 00 10, 016. 83 63. 6 273, 744. 61 1, 728, 507. 08 0. 00 0. 00 111, 544.67 111, 544.67 33, 139. 16 1, 898, 963. 76 33, 139. 16 1, 898, 963. 76 30. 1 30. 1 e ;j. i • 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 2, 750. 00 298.53 1, 838. 28 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 3, 300. 00 768.762, 545. 18 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 600.00 0.00 424.77 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 8, 200. 00 1, 851. 62 5, 138. 79 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 2, 500. 00 216, 61 _ 1, 050. 24 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,000.00 11.31 501.79 4315 MEMBERSHIP 650.00 6.00 354.00 4316 TRAINING 1, 900. 00 6. 00_697. 78 0. 00 911.72 66. 8 0. 00 _---___----754. 82 77. 1 0. 00 175. 23 70. 7 0. 00 3, 061. 21 62. 6 0. 00 ____ ___1, 449. 76___- 42. 0 0. 00 498. 21 50. 1 0.00 296.00 54.4 80. 50 1, 121. 72_ 40. 9 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:48:36 FUND DIV OBJT DF_SCR 001 GENERAL FUND 2201 FIRE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) _FROM .. 12/01 /91...._T0_12/31/91 ________ APPROPRIATION PACE 0012 DATE 02/14/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 1'} MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND._ _ ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE DEPT: FIRE 4300, MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER_ 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 2,000.00 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 110, 992. 00 OBJECT_ SUBTOTAL133, 892. 00 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT_ -LESS THAN._$500 3, 790 00 518. 89 1, 540 69 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 4, 100. 00 0. 00 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7, 890. 00 518. 89 1, 540. 69 0. 00 0. 00 9, 249. 00 55, 494. 00 12, 407, 83 -._._ 68, 044. 83 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS .OBJECT SUBTOTAL 82, 541. 00 82, 541 00 0. 00 25, 003. 60 0 00. ______-__ 25,. 003. 60 0. 00 0. 00 80. 50 2, 000. 00 55, 498. 00 65, 766. 67 0. 0 49. 9 50. 8 _ 1,1 el 11 422._1.7__ 1, 827.. 14__..__.._.51. 7 --_I 0. 00 4, 100. 00 0. 011 422.17 5,927.14 24.8 ', 1 I 0. 00 0 00 57, 537. 40 57, 537. 40 30. 2 ________ DI.VISION__TOTAI 1. 477, 906 00 96,._766. 55______739,787_.43__- 12,_4.71__81__ ___725. 646_.76....._._____50._9 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1, 477, 906. 00 96, 766. 55 739, 787. 43 12, 471.81 725, 646. 76 50. 9 2401 ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT: ANIMAL REGULTN _____4100_ PERSONAL_SERVICES .�, 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 102, 781. 00 8, 254- 52 45, 863. 57 0. 00 56, 917. 43 44.6 •:') 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1, 100. 00 0. 00 595. 18 0. 00 504. 82 54. 1 <, .:I!" _ 4110 VACATION/SICK. PAY OFF 1, 498. 00 0. 00 . _.0.-00. 0 00 1, 498. 00 _.. . 0. 0 -'i 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1, 498. 00 495. 57 1, 482. 12 0. 00 15. 88 98. 9 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 400.00 29.58 175.95 0.00 2244. 05 43.9 4185 SOCIAL_ _SECURIT_Y.(F_I_C_A) 0 00 0 00... 0.00 0 00 4187 UNIFORMS --.--_-0..00.._..0. 0 ____ 900.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9000.00 0.0 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 896.00 73.66 363.71 0.00 532.29 40. 5 ..OBJECT__SUBTOTAL 109, 073__00 8, 853__33_._-___-_48,_480__53 0 00 60, 592._47__ _____.. 44. 4 _ 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT... SERVICE/PRIVATE 1., 500__00.__....46. 00..___.438.45 0 00.._. 4251 CONTRACT•'SERVICE/GOVT 6, 000. 00 217. 39 2, 365. 48 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7, 500. 00 263. 39 2, 803. 93 0. 00 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE. OPER .SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES' 4311 -AUTO MAINTENANCE.__.___________ _._ 1, 061. 55 .._-_... 29. 2 3, 634. 52 39. 4 4, 696. 07 37. 3 , , 1 j 700.00 48.02 307.29 0.00 392.71 43.8 1, 700. 00 __. _ ._..._._.__._-_._ 26. 95 ___-._1, 029. 65 _ _ 0 00_____ _670. 35 ___ 60.5 ... 600.00 107.54 214.48 0.00 385.52 35.7 1, 600. 00 74. 36 655. 95 0. 00 944. 05 40. 9 ---_2,.200-.00 133..17_._-__-- -391_.50_ 0 00_.-____-__._.1,.808._50..._---__-__17..7 -- i 7.) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH F/,ecs-pA*5« EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (o, FUND) ':': 21 «: :;31,rnom 1e/01/91 TO �e/n���z ^ PAGE 0013 411._ 12/31/91______ ___________ ,. DATE 02/14/9e _ 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE |,. N--_ "«1 GENERAL FUND -__womrm-Y__sxp_-__Y7o.sxpwm.---_--ENCUMBRANCE owswo BALANCE' ' | NN 2401 ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT: mvzrALREGuLTN�----------------------- 4000MATER IALn/auppLzso -~^~ MEMBERSHIP �aoo m om -- ------------ N, �o�� rn��wzwo 150. 00 o oo O. 00 O. 00 __ 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 500.00 o 00 84. 79 • O. 00 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER u*Go 11. 797. oo ---'-983on m 898. 00 O. 00 o�oo--- 0. 00 � OBJECT SUBTOTAL 19.297'00 1, 373. 04 8, 581. 1. 50. 00 65. 21 500. 00 5, 899 00 1«.715.o4 0. 0 56. 5 u. 0 49. 9 44. 4 • '�' 1 5400 EQUIPMENT ' - --- ^- N 5401 smuIpmswr-LESS THAN *000----------- --_---____-'-_--_---____'----_-_'_- ' OBJECT SUBTOTAL oo o� 000.oo 0. 00 1, 050. 00 0.0 �" 01�`onv.uvO. 00 O. 00 O. 00 �.ono oo n n "/ 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS a9oo�LEASE PAYMENTS 0 00 0 oo_--_--__-_ECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 o�oo-m.om--- o nm o o �'NN . ' - ..° 0. 00 0. 0 4� DIVISION TOTAL 136, 920. oo 10, 489. 76 9------------------ ------_-__- |�|- �� O. mo 77.053.88 *o. 7DEPARTMENT TOTAL _136. 920. 76 59, 866 ^. 0. 00 / 2701 CIVIL DEFENSE DEPT: DISASTER PREP � i 411 • 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES -�------------��- ____ / ----___'_OBJECT---------------'----'-----------''------------- ---' '---- __- >^'1,l.' 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 26, 373. 2.�a4oo ' 4110 VACATION/SICK nvaoo ' axa�uu O. 12.755.00 51.a 41P�o oo O. O. 00 396oo-- n o^9 . 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4187 UNIFORMS 396oo0. 00 194. 63 O. 00 201 37 49 1 suororAL 27' 340. 00 175oo 1~.=u 87. 48 O. 00 49. v ''No'a~u.on 13, 900. 11 o oo ' �op�a�mo.s____!�//^/ '1/` 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 87. 52 13 4 __'_ -_'-_--------*201 CONTRACT asnvzos/pnzv --.2 -49--0 -0 --_-----_-_--__-__--__--'-_--_'-_-_-_--__-_-_-_-_ ---------�--'-----_---'- -- �' 4251 CONTRACT 330 N�cSERVICE/GOVT o'-�.� O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 3, 448. 00 �-2`060.e5 O. 00 2, 188. 15 '�-''5 . i.� OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7'697.00 330. 18 :,060.e5 O. 00 5. 636. 15 --.'o 0 / 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER e.^^ 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 2,725.00 O. 00 O. 00 o00 2'72o00 o�o `41 4316• TRAINING eno ooO. 00 u 00 o om 2oomno.o9^'96 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS u`»y�»o _'aoo.00 O. 00 m oo o uo300 - OBJECT 257. '�«z�oo m 00 1, 544 00 -'.` iW1~�^``� 257. 00 1, 542. O. 00 .�u�*�00 16. 0 _H il] 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN ~^°vw" oo w� v!j /•. --'------------ ��-�-----�-------''---' ----' |::]A, - -- - ' ------ _-_ L , ww 1 ' •i 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES_ 8, 800. 00 798_49 3..382 96 0 00 5, 417. 04 38. 4 . , . • 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 5, 000. 00 246. 31 450. 63 1, 493. 85 3, 055. 52 38. 8 . 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 350.00 0.00 1.04 0.00 348.96 0. 2 ......_ . 4311 AUTO tlAINTENANCE 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00 _Q.00.__.500. 00 0. 0 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 5, 496. 00 458.00 2, 748. 00 0. 00 2, 748. 00 50. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 20, 146. 00 1, 502. 80 6, 582. 63 1, 493. 85 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11: 48: 3,6 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 5400„ EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91. PAGE 0014 ' DATE 02/14/92 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION _ MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND, ENCUMBRANCE . UNENC BALANCE X 1.;14 2, 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00. . _ 0. 00 - 2, 500. 00 0. 0 :•, i-• ; 37.1 .11 47, 149. 00 2, 985. 76 17, 502. 96 0. 00 29, 645. 04 DEPARTMENT_ TO TAL 47, 148. 00 2, 8135. 76 17, 502. 96 0. 00 3101 MEDIANS DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 29, 645. 04 37. 1 4100 PERSONAL SERV ICES 4102 REGULAR SALAR I ES/MI SC 53. 458. 00 4. 397. 90 25, 846. 56' at O. 00 27, 611. 44 48.3 ;.. 4106 REGULAR OVERT I ME 300. 00 17. 82 226. 04 0 00. .73. 96 _ 75.3 3 , 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 776.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 776.00 0.0 . 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2. 576. 00 160. 85 2, 035. 37 O. 00 540. 63 79.0 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 287 00 . 24.44 . 104. 31_ O. 00. . - 182. 69 36.3 _ . _ ! " OBJECT SUBTOTAL 57, 397. 00 4, 601. 01 28. 212. 29 O. 00 29. 184. 72 49.1 1 , 4200. CONTRACT SERVICES H 1 ..! 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 48, 200. 00 4, 636. 50 19, 741. 68 O. 00 28. 458. 32 40. 9 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 1, 300. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 1, 300. 00 O. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL. 49. 500. 00. 4, 636. 50 19,741 68 0 00_ 29. 758. 32 39. 8 '45 1 12. 069. 52 40.0 DIVISION TOTAL 127, 043. 00 10, 740. 31 54, 536. 59 1 I 3103 ST MAINTENANCE DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN !' I I'l 4100 .PERSONAL SERVICES 1.1 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 155, 614. 00 12, 527. 90 75, 105. 66 O. 00 80, 509. 34 48.2 I -d 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500. 00 O. 00 186. 59 O. 00 313. 41 37. 3 : It . 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 2. 411. 00 O. 00 2, 409. 08 .0. 00 1.92 99. 9 ! I 4111 ACCRUAL CASH -IN 3, 011. 00 749. 90 2, 509. 92 O. 00 501.08 83. 3 -!! 4195 SOC IAL SECUR ITY(F I C A) O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 0.00 O. 00 O. 0 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 729. 00 91 66 490. 61 0 00 _ _ _ .238. 39 . __ 1--7; OBJECT SUBTOTAL . 162. 265. 00 13, 369. 46 80p 701. 86 O. 00 81, 563. 14 49. 7 1 ! ' 4200 .CONTRACT -SERVICES-- ____ __ __ ---------------- 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 84, 408. 00 5. 916. 92 31, 504. 77 O. 00 52, 903. 23 37. 3 IIIC ri 1, 493. 95 71, 012. 56 44. 1 A „., • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH )73 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:40:S6 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) ! PAGE 0015 1 FROM 12/01/91 _ T0,12/31/91 DATE 02/14/92 rr 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE I ' FUND DIV OBJT DESCR. 0 APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % 001 GENERAL FUND 3103 ST MAINTENANCE DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 4200_ CONTRACT_ SERVICES_ - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 84. 408. 00 5, 916. 92 31, 504. 77 0. 00 52, 903. 23 37. 3 AD 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ..., 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 21. 000. 00 3, 012. 95 8, 318. 23 352. 06 12, 329. 71 41. 2 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4. 600 00 201.99• 41. 9 0. 00 3, 058. 41 33. 5 1:, • 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 6. 700. 00 1, 426. 61 3. 824. 23 0.00 2, e75. 77 57.0 4316 TRAINING 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 600. 00 0.0 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 59, 304. 00 4. 942. 00 29. 652. 00 0. 00 29. 652. 00 50. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 92, 204. 00 9, 583. 55 43, 336. 05 352. 06 48, 515. 89 47. 3 - 'ak 5400 EQUIPMENT 111, 5402 EGUIPMENT-MORE THAN $500 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4 0. 00 0. 0 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS F: • 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS20.844 .00 1, 736. 78 10, 420. 68 0. 00 10, 423. 32 49.9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 20,844.00 V 1, 736. 78 10, 420. 68 0. 00 10, 423. 32 49.9 1;: • 49 '' DIVISION TOTAL 359,721.00 30,606.71 165,963.36 352.06 193,405.58 46.2 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 41.00 PERSONAL_SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME O .1 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 90. 613. 00 6, 989. 16 44, 354. 06 0.00 46, 258. 94 48. 9 500. 00 0.00 41/0 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 3, 570. 00_.___ 0. 00 3. 497. 00 46. 08 0. 00 453. 92 9. 2 .: • I 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 0. 00 73. 00 97. 9 ' i . 0 ' 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 3. 770. 00 150. 00 834. 05 3, 200. 37 0. 00 569. 63 84. 8 27. 32 110.78 0.00 39. 22 " '- , 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL . 98, 603. 00 _ 7, 850. 53 51, 208. 29 0.00- 19, 815 00 8, 400. 00 2, 794. 50 6. 282. 00__ _ O. 00 __13, 533. 00 47, 394. 71 __ 375311... 7 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 9 • 8 O 4.1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2131215. 00 459. 03 2, ose. 0 i. 0.00 6, 341. 99 24.5 : I ,Iff, 3. 253. 53 8. 340. 01 0.00 19, 874. 99 29.5 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 10p 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 34, 150. 00 1, 508. 29 7, 267. 19 4303 UTILITIES ' 6, 365. 00 620. 59 2. 929. 14 . 04 0.00 3. 435. 86 46.0 1) 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1, 570. 00 206 ___ 26, 676. 77 21. 8 ei- 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 88. 02 923. 56 0. 00 646. 44 58. 8 11' 4315 MEMBERSHIP 2, 100. 00 214. 18 1, 156. 07 0. 00 943. 93 55. 0 04 200. 00 0. 00 60.0O _ O. 00 140. 00 _ 30. 0_....: fts .71 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:48:36 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM__12/01/91_. _ TO 12/31/91..__.__-_-__ FUND DIV OBJT. DESCR APPROPRIATION... MONTFLY EXP__.___. YTD .EXPND.________.._ENCUMBR.ANCE UNENC BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND PAGE 0016 DATE 02/14/92 50.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER.____-__.___________ 4316 TRAINING -. -- 300. 00 0. 00I OUT -INS USER CHGS 0.00 0.00 300.00 O. O I 4396 TRSFRI 9, 986. 00 832. 00 4, 992. 00 0. 00 4, 994. 00 49.9 ' OBJECT SUBTOTAL 54, 671. 00 _3, 263. OB _ I ,1 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS __.17, 327. 96 _ 206 04 _ __ 37, 137. 00 ... 32.0.._ _..." I 6900 LEASE. PAYMENTS I'^� 10,-096._00 ___ __ .855..11_____5,97_1_95__ OBJECT SUBTOTAL 10, 096. 00 0 00 4, 124. 05 ___.___._.__ 59. .1 .-_.__ �:: 855. i l 5, 971.95 O. 00 4, 124. 05 59.1 1 1 DIVISION TOTAL 191, 585. 00 15, 222. 25 82, 848. 21 206. 04 108, 530. 75 43. 3 . DEPARTMENT_TOTAL__-_______ .678, 349__00_________-56,.569.27____...___303,.348.-16-._-__2, 051._95___.___ 372, 948. 89 .._....__.. 45. 0 . 1 JP I 1 i 4101 PLANNING DEPT: PLANNING 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 222, 813. 00 17, $61.09 104, 770. 22 4106 REGULAR. OVERTIME____- 300..00._0..00.___...53 0. 00 118, 042. 78 47. 0 40. 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 3, 293. 00 0 00___ 259. 47 __. __. 13. 5 3, 293. 00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2, 341.44 2, 341.44 O. 00 0. QO O. 00 0. 00 3, 293. QO 0. 0 4112 PART.. TIME/TEMPORARY __ 9, 000. 00 .__. 554. 69____.3, 745. 33951. 56 71. i 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 642.00 0 00 -------.5,254.67____. .41.6 _._._ 2, 379. 00 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 191. 45 1, 148. 78 0. 00 34.40 232.21 0.00 409. 79 36. 1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL_.._. _.--__.. 241._720. 00__20, 983. 07._ -_.....----112, 278..51._--__ ___ _0. 00._. ____ .129, 4411. 49.. _.. .._ 46. 4 __ 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE7, 975...00 _ OBJECT SUBTOTAL ---0. 00 b, 390 31 0 00 _1, 584. 69 80. .1 _ 7, 975. 00 0. 00 6, 390. 31 0. 00 1, 584. 69 80. 1 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER._ 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES __ 4310 MOTOR FUELS -AND .LUBES_______ 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP ` 4316 TRAINING...-_. __-- __-.._.__. 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401.EQUIPMENT-LESS _.'THAN _.$500 1, 832. 00 -- ------ - --- -- --... ---- --- ----- -- -- - -- -... - 171. 07 912.80 " 9 - 17, 050. 00 O. 00 919. 20 49. 8 350. 06 2, 747. 50 0. 00 14, 302. 50 16. 1 -- 242. 00 630.00 21. 47 _._... - 68. 74 0 00-.... - - 173. 26 _ - 28. 4 855. 00 0.00 11.60 0.00 618.40 1.8 0. 00 120. 00 0. 00 _ 1, 800..00___-_. 735. 00 14. O 60. 00 __..----._-_-- - 398. 42 0 00 ___1,.401. 5 1, 300. 00 0. 00 1, 242. 30 0 ----- -_ 95.5 __.. 8, 592. 00 O. 00 57. 70 95. 5 716. 00 4, 296. 00 0. 00 4, 296. 00 50. 0 __.2, 301. OQ.__1, 318. 60 _.________ .9,_797 36 0 00_---_22, 503..64 -__---- 30. 3 _- J 2,.000__00_ 0__00___ -1,121._41 0 00-_--___---878. 59_____..56. Q -._ 4 R A 4 5 1 f CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 0 FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0017 II . TIME 11: 48: 36 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/14/92 I 1 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE /' : r FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % 001 GENERAL FUND 5400 EQUIPMENT ; V OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 000. 00 0. 00 1, 121. 41 0. 00 878,59 56.0 • DIVISION TOTAL 283, 996. 00 22, 301. 67 129, 587. 59 O. 00 4102 PLANNING COMM DEPT: PLANNING 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES • 5) 4201 CONTRACT .SERVICE/PRIVATE 6, 000. 00 454. 25 1,949. 50 0. 00 4, 050. 50 32. 4 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6, 000. 00 454. 25 1, 949. 50 0. 00 4, 050. 50 32. 4 :23 0 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1 , 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 5,500.00 153.84 1,354.93 0.00 4,145.07 24.6 r)- 4316 TRAINING 228. 00 0. 00 7. 06 0. 00 220. 94 3. 0 4317.CONFERENCE.EXPENSE 1,320, 00 1.2;P 7.40 187.40 _ 0. 00 1, 132. 60 14. 1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7, 048. 00 161.24 1, 549. 39 0. 00 ,5, 498. 61 21.9 '1 g, DIVISION TOTAL 13, 048. 00 615. 49 3, 498. 89 0. 00 9, 549. 11 26.8 DEPARTMENT__TOTAL_ _297, 044_00 22.917. 16 133, 086_48 0. 00 .163, 957. 52 44. 13 _ _ : . 1 0, 4201 BUILDING DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF , • 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES fp - 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 254, 581. 00 20, 025. 57 119, 189. 67 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500. 00_ 0. 00 141. 86 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 3, 677. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3, 677. 00 1, 919. 40 1, 919. 40 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 ".! 1 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2, 602. 00 188. 45 1, 086. 88 0 L• , OBJECT SUBTOTAL 265, 037. 00 22, 133. 42 122, 337. 81 3, 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES O 1 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT ,, OBJECT SUBTOTAL O .;..i .............._.4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 2,400.00 175.92 1,171.38 0.00 1,228.62 48.8 Illr' 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 7,149.00 403.63 2,389.39 173.20 4,586.41 35.8 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS _ ', 0. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 980.00 124.50 474.23 0.00 505.77 48.3 • ,:! 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 750.00 20.00 91.85 0.00 658.15 12.2 4315 MEMBERSHIP 300.00.150.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 _ 83.3 0 :1 */1-'1 0 0. 00 135, 391. 33 46.8 0 0 00 358. 14 28. 3 ,_ 0. 00 3, 677. 00 0. 0 0. 00 1, 7517. 60 52.2 : 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 1, 515. 12 41.7 0. 00 142, 699. 19 46. 1 0 _ . . . 69, 709. 00 7, 452. 71 28, 932. 94 465. 40 40, 310. 66 42.1-.5 900. 00 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 900. 00 0. 0 i 70, 609. 00 7, 452. 71 28, 932. 94 465. 40 41, 210. 66 41.6 1 ' • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0018 .) TIME 11:46: 36 ___FROM _12/01/91__ TO .12/31/91 __ DATE 02/14/92 t 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE Ii FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 4201 BUILDING APPROPRIATION .MONTHLY. EXP YTD- EXPND._.. . ._-_-__ ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER__._-__ 4316 TRAINING 2, 600. 00 515. 65 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 1, 000. 00 0. 00 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS _USER CHGS____-_ 32, 302. 00 2, 692. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 47, 481.00 4, 081.70 5400. EQUIPMENT___- -------_---- --- 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 688.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 688.00 DIVISION TOTAL 383, 815. 00 4202 PUB,WKS ADMIN DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF .4100.. PERSONAL__ SERVICES 1, 451.06 0. 00 16, 152. 00 21, 979. 91 0. 00 688. 47 0. 00 688. 47 33, 667. 83 950. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 123. 20 0. 00 0. 00 198. 94 1, 000. 00 16, 150. 00 24, 377. 89 92. 3 0. 0 50. 0 ... 48. 6 0. 47- 100..0 0. 47- 100. 0 173, 939. 13 1, 588. 60 208, 287. 27 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 177, 658. 00 13, 534. 72 83, 590. 43 0. 00 94, 067. 57 47. 0 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500.00 0.00 366.89 0.00 133. 11 73.3 4110 VACATION/SICK. PAY__OFF____--._3, 534. 00 .._...__O. 00 3, 497..00 __ _-_ 0. 00 __ 37. 00 _._.-.. 98. 9. __ 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2, 134. 00 160. 85 561. 97 O. 00 1, 572. 03 26. 3 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY (F I C A) 0. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 0. 00 O. 0 _ 4187 UNIFORMS ------------------- 7, 070. 00 508. 30 .----__.2, 874. 82 __---- O. 00 4, 195. 18 _.. 40. 6 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1, 861.00 190. 63 1, 281. 88 0. 00 579. 12 68. 8 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 192, 757. 00 14, 394. 50 92, 172. 99 O. 00 100, 584. 01 47. 8 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 16,373.00 OBJECT_ SUBTOTAL ______16,373 00 3, 283. 00 13, 412. 49 0. 00 2, 960! 51 81. 9 3,.283._0013,_412.49 0. 00 2, 960. 51__.__.._...81.9_ ,P, 1.9_ I.�.I 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER i.� 4304 TELEPHONE___ . ___.. 5,.950_.00. ._ _417.63 2,801.S3 0 00 ___ 3, 148. OZ . _ 47. Q _. _ 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 10, 000. 00 1, 061. 14 5, 109. 83 53. 04 4, 837. 13 51. 6 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 400. 00 O. 00 40. 03 O. 00 359. 97 10. 0 4310 MOTOR..FUELS_AND__LUBES 750..00 48. 69 291. 74 .__._ O. 00 458. 26 _____ 38. 8 ____ 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 882.00 4.00 403.95 0.00 478.05 45. 7 4315 MEMBERSHIP 840.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 840.00 O.0 4316 TRAINING ____:_-----__.-- -.2. 000. 00-----._...-- --- O. 00- ---------1, 093. 50 . 0. 00 . --------- 906. 50 .. -- _ 54. 6 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 800. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 800. 00 O. 0 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 50, 891. 00 4, 241.00 25, 446. 00 O. 00 25, 445. 00 50.0 Jt OBJECT SUBTOTAL 72, 513_00_.__._5, 772...46__.______.-35,_186 98 53 04 37,.272._98___._._.-48. 5._.__.. 5400 EQUIPMENT ' 5401. EQUIPMENT -LESS -_THAN- $500____.-___100-.00._______-_____0. 00 90 93 0 00 9 07 90. 9.__.__ ,4 d) 4.1 0I • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 1 1:40: 36 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0019 0 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 _ DATE 02/14/92 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE t • FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXPYTD ..EXPND._____,..-__ ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE '/. 001 GENERAL FUND 5400 EQUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 100. 00 0. 00 90. 93 0. 00 9. 07 281, 743. 00 23, 449. 96 140, 863. 39 53. 04 4204 BLDG MAINTDEPT:_-_CONST/ENGIN/F_NF 140, 826. 57 50. 0 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES _ 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 158,741. 00 12,796..1077, 612. 98 0. 00 81, 128. 02 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1, 685. 00 261. 80 978. 62 0. 00 706. 38 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 3, 571. 00 0. 00 , 3, 497. 00 0. 00 74. 00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2, 371. 00 160. 852, 065. 97 0. 00 __.... _ 305. 03 4187 UNIFORMS 200.00 16.68 100.08 0.00 99.92 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 37. 00 7.32 29. 14 0.00 7.86 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 166,605 00 13, 242. 75 _..._.84,283 79 0. 00 - _.--.._82,.321.21 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES • 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 30, 066.00 841. 008,928 50 0 00_-______ 21, 137. 50 __.. ___. 29. 6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 30, 066. 00 841.00 8, 928. 50 0. 00 21, 137. 50 29. 6 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 94, 500. 00 8, 504. 76 45, 411.01 0. 00 49, 088. 99 4B. 0 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 35, 090. 00 2, 184. 90 15, 489. 14 935. 96 18, 665. 00 46. 8 4310_ MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 968. 00 84. 67 766. 06 _ 0. 00___,_ 201.94 ___ 79. 1 4311. AUTO MAINTENANCE 1, 000. 00 351. 30 836. 44 0. 00 163. 56 83. 6 4316 TRAINING 200. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 200. 00 0. 0 H._,._._._ .............__....____ 4321 BUILDING ...SAFETY/SECURITY 4, 600. 00 96. 12 1, 475 78 0.003,124.22 ____ 32.0 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 29, 107. 00 2, 426. 00 14, 556. 00 0. 00 14, 551.00 50. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 165, 465. 00 13, 647. 75 78, 534. 43 935. 86 85, 994. 71 48. 0 • 48.8._ 58. 0 97.9 • 87.1......'.'_ 50.0 78.17 50. 5 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 ___ 5402 EQUIPMENT-MORE._THAN- $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 2, 100. 00.--_-_--_ 0. 00 2, 100. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0,- 00 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 364, 236. 00 27, 731. 50 171, 746. 72 4205 EQUIP SERVICE DEPT:__-CONST/ENGIN/ENF •""j 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL _CASH IN •°i 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 _.... - - 2, 100. 00 - 0. 0 - 0. 00 2, 100. 00 0. 0 935. 86 191, 553.42 47.4 97, 444. 00 6, 675. 66 46,249..78 0. 00 51, 194. 22 47. 4 600.00 0.00 62.90 0.00 537. 10 10.4 3, 709. 00 0. 00 3, 682. 34 0. 00 26. 66 99. 2 1, 609, 00 160. 85561, 97 0. 00__1, 047.03.... _ 34. 9 _.__, •1 1' I• • e �1 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:48:36 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0020 A FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 _ DATE 02/14/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE -'3'1 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND.ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 4205 EQUIP SERVICE DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 4189 MEDICARE. BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT. SERVICES 5. 600. 00 1. 222. 88 5, 570. 88 0. 00 350. 00 75. 82 345. 39 0. 00 704. 00 408. 43 673. 02 0. 00 110, 016. 00 et 543. 64 57, 146. 28 0. 00 29. 12 4. 61 30. 98 52. 869. 72 99.4 98.6 95.5 51.9 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4,958.00 616.00 1.991.00 0.00 2,967.00 40.1 4, 958. 00 616. 00 1, 991. 00 0. 00 2, 967. 00 40. 1 * 1,11 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4.725. 00 954. 90 2.320. 36 0. 00 2.404. 64 49. 1 4310. MOTOR.FUELS. AND. LUBES 2,615.00 1,065.16 224.92 12921.10_ 0.00 693.90._ 73. 11 4314 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2,615.00 1,997.62 0.00 4 617.38 76.3 4316 TRAINING 200.00 0.00 • 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.0 4396 TRSFR.OUT-INS USER_CHGS 11,779 00 982..00.____._5,892.0O 0 00 5,867.00 50.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 21,934.00 3.226.98 12.131.08 0.00 9,802.92 55.3 5400_EGUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 10,407.00 0.00 10.365.23 0.00 41.77 99.5 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1.1 10,407.00 0.00 10,365.23 0.00 41.77 99.5 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 5,016.00 417.96 2,507.76 0.00 2,508.24 49.9 OBJECT_SUBTOTAL 5,016.00 _417.96. .2..507 76 0 00 2,508.24_ 49.91 , . , 1 '1 A DIVISION _TOTAL _152,331 00__12,804..58 84,141-35 0 00 68,189-65_______55.2______ 1 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1.182.125.00 97.653.87 570.690.59 2,577.50 608,856.91 48.4 11 4 ! : ! A :..1 "I) 4601 COMM RESOURCES DEPT: COMM PROMOTION 4100 PERSONAL.SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 185,470.00 13,327.00 86,746.86 0.00 98,723.14 46.7 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.0 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF. 2,758.00 ----------------------------0.00 0.00 0.00 2,758.00 -------------0.0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,758.00 0.00 2,140.56 0.00 617.44 77.6 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 71,173 00 3 994 47 37 0.00 34,134.43 52.0 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) . 4,32E00 247.64. 2,296.44. 0.00 2,031.56 53.0 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,133.00 136.59 1,122.55 0.00 1,010.45 52.6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL f • 269, 620. 00 17, 705. 70 129, 344. 98 0. 00 140, 275. 02 47. 9 ; 4 1. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH e, FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TINE 11:49:36 PAGE 0021 0 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/14/92 7-- ' 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 17: FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0 001 GENERAL FUND 4601 COMM RESOURCES DEPT: COMM PROMOTION - l' • 1 4200 CONTRACT_ SERVICES . 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 65, 750. 00 fr) , OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4. 711. 60 43, 260. 35 955. 05 21, 534. 60 67. 2 ' 65, 750. 00 4. 711. 60 43, 260. 35 955. 05 21, 534. 60 67.2 4300 MATER IALS /SUPPL I ES /OTHER re r." 4302 ADVERTISING12,000. 00 ' 10. 00 • 3, 617. 07 3, 522. 05 4, 860. 88 59. 4 4304 TELEPHONE3, 600. 00 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 197. 85 1, 194. 45 O. 00 _ 2, 405. 55 33. 1 H 49 9, 500. 00 1, 362. 80 4. 965. 49 O. 00 4, 534. 51 52. 2 4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS 12, 500. 00 H 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 750. 00 695. 04 6, 091. 45 92.00 6, 316. 55 49. 4 38. 91 --------------290.16 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 350.00 O. 00 152. 38 O. 00 _ O. 00 . . . 459. 84 _ 38. 6 4315 MEMBERSHIP 197. 62 43. 5 4316 TRAINING 700. 00 500. 00 O. 00 128. 00 O. 00 572. 00 18..2 68. 00 74. 00 O. 00 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 1, 600. 00 O. 00 O. 00 426.00 . 14.8 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 20, 233. 00 1, 686. 00 O. 00 1, 600. 00 O. 0 I, OBJECT SUBTOTAL 61. 733. 00 • 10. 116. 00 O. 00 10, 117. 00 49. 9 4. 058. 60 26, 629. 00 3._614, 05_ 31, 489. 95 --------.,48.9 ..I 19 _ 5400 EQUIPMENT J 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00_ O. 00 O. 0 1 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 O. 00 il 9 , OBJECT SUBTOTAL O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 0 ,1 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 0 el ..I 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 0 :AO • ; 000- ' 0.0O O 00 O. 00 O. 0 110; 1 Lie i; . DIVISION TOTAL 397. 103. 00 26,475. 90 199. 234. 33 4, 569. 10 193. 299. 57 51. 3 1 , DEPARTMENT TOTAL 397, 103. 00. 1 26,475.90 199.234.33 4, 569. 10 193, 299. 57 51. 3 6101 PARKS DEPT: PARKS/REC 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR 8ALAR IES/MISC .,! s 1.• 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 83.079. 00 6, 849. 50 40. 438. 93 O. 00 42,640. 07 48. 6 500. 00 26. 76 234. 86 O. 00 265. 14 46. 9 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 1,208. 00 : 0 00 O. 00 O. 00 1, 208..00 _ O. 0 ._ _ 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2, 708. 00 2 17 160. 85 2, 183. 67 0.00 524.33 80.6 :Il 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F IC A) ; ' 0.00 0.00 0.00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 0 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 287. 00 : • 24. 40 165. 80 O. 00 121. 20 57. 7 .... • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 137. 782. 00 7. 061. 51 J . 43a 023. 26 O. 00 -44;758. 74 49. 0 0 •1 . . 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES._ _ ] H 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 143. 375. 00 8, 522. 00 9 ..1 44, 981. 30 O. 00 98, 393. 70 31. 3 VI ; I 1 E FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:48: 36 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 6101 PARKS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0022 .FROM.12/01/91_._.TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/14/92 • 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE '.'. APPROPRIATION..__.._... _ MONTHLY. EXP ..._._. YTD EXPND. _.._._. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE DEPT: PARKS/REC 4200 CONTRACT._SERVICES _ OBJECT SUBTOTAL 143, 375. 00 4300 MATER IALS /SUPPLIES/OTHER___ ______ ___ 4303 UTILITIES 50, 000. 00 4304 TELEPHONE 375. 00 4309 MAINTENANCE. MATERIALS. 15,000.00 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 900.00 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1, 500. 00 4315 MEMBERSHIP 200 00 4316 TRAINING 300.00 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 14,673.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL_ ____.__ 82, 948.00 DIVISION. ___TOTAL_. DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8, 522. 00 3, 809. 74 19. 73 1, 356. 69 128. 23 14. 43 0 00 0. 00 1, 223. 00 6, 551. 82 44, 981. 30 0. 00 18, 178. 96 0. 00 128. 85 0. 00 5,.284. 95_ 1, 229. 42 ___ 791. 52 0. 00 291. 15 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 .---. 0. 00 0. 00 7, 338. 00 0. 00 32, 013. 43._._.__.___.. 1, 229. 42._. _..... 98, 393. 70 31, 821. 04 246. 15 8, 485. 63 108. 48 1, 208. 85 200. 00 300. 00 7, 335. 00 49, 705. 15 31. 3 36. 3 34. 3 43. 4 87. 9 19. 4 0. 0 0. 0 50. 0 40. 0 314,_105_..00. _22, 135..33-______.120,.017.99. _ .__1,22942192 857. 59..._._._ 38..6 _. 314, 105. 00 22, 135. 33 8142 CIP 89-142 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200. CONTRACT SERVICES_._.___ 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 120, 017. 99 1, 229. 42 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 192, 857. 59 0. 00 0. 00 38. 6 ••1 0. 0 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0! 00 0. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 11. 912, 324..00______1, 354, 179..77__.__...5,_817,..444_01._-_.___57,_722..06.._.__ _6, 037, 157. 93 ._..._._. _ 49. .3 ... _. �� CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) rImE 11:4a��� PAGE 0000r*om12/oz/v17o12/o1/p1 ~,^ -__--__ DATE 0:/14/92_50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE pLsrs 7 - FUND DIV oaJr_osscn APPROPRIATION MONTHLY sxp-_-�TosnpmosmComonAwos UNENC BALANCE x 11.. 103 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND 1299 BUDGET rnAworsRDEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT ���--------'----'-''-- '- • 0 |� 0� 4300 mArsnI/|� OPERATING4399 TRANSFERS OUT e2.000.00 --' ``, 833. 1 /-4:1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL :�0�� 1'�.o 1n.999. 9810`99998 0.»o u'000. 02 49. 9 '".uv 11, ono� o� 4�v .^ N� �|� DIVISION TOTAL 22, 000. oo .' 10, 999. o� on ��. uoo� o� �v�� ..0� DEPARTMENT .".°L � .moo 00 1, 833. ---3 y1 0. 00 11'000 02 4pv�au� STREET LIGHTING DEPT: STREET LIGHTING -'-_-_--'_-_-_--_---�-------_-_---_-_--_----- --- l' .- 1:- ! 0 , 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES .!- 41������I��z�p9^4�.�o.����',� 500.4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 00 o»» _o.oo-50, 979. 46 48.17r ' '1 . 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 1 ^--8. "° 66. 90 0. 00 433. 10 13 3 ' ' 0 . 0. 00 0. 00 1' 448. 00 o� o*��x ACCRUAL CASH IN 2`r°8eo��»o �2`4o5. 47 o. °o m���oa oaa �'`im4110 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 500. 00 o oo---''13 *'u» RETIREMENT 13, 707. oo 1' 120 18 0. 0. 00 500oo o o /! 4185 SOCIAL oscunzTyCFJ�c A) 0 00 0 oo 5, 538. 13 -_-'-_-_-_-_-'_-_-_-__-_-------'-n'�'--------'__-m.00 --_-----_--n. 16a 87 4o� 4 `'^ | ' 0 ' *1�s���so��z� 12'024.00 978. 60 ---o�oo o.0 `o�^5 ' 41e9 MEDICARE BENEFITS 572. 00 48. 56 oup 31 0.00 |]mooa'426. 24 4a.ooo�scIsyoIqTAL �o�,--' 00 262. 69 ~`." MW/ ��. oa2.�7u�x »^�o_� 68, 730. 47. 5 |'1N'' 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ' .; 4201 cowrnAuTasnv�ns/Pnzv�rso.00u.00 !- 5, 597. 76 '��.i-=5^ CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 3.407.00 1'931'00 0 o«--1.u6v.uo_a4o --' ' , /' OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6.407.00 45902 9ou 1'717p9 0. 00 1'6a9.«1 mu. 4 ''o'64a. pv 0. 00 2, 758. 01 na. 9 , 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER b ~ ,0 , . 4303 UTILITIES ------'--'_----'_---_---_-_-'-.--_---_------------17o.o45.mo -------------'----------_-_-_'--_'-_------_--_'_-_-___-__-_-_-_-----_-�-----'-----_-_---_--'--__--'-- _--_---__--_--�� / �.'. / 12, 63.327.05 0. 00 109, 017. pn 36.7 ', w�*on�Ts�sp*owc ""`'vv p ar 53vm / 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 5.p7cooo.oo247. 05 179 |'1)� 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 3, 750. uu o�� �� 206. 04 2, 931. eo on� 9 1:.!! 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 'uo«^no222� 31 �mo 26 o oo 2'9967� �m.m 1i-4o1a TRAINING. 300. 00 62. 95 �.a�� 43 m oo 2, 358. m/ 43.8 /� ''' 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 11' ,_31. 00 0. 00 0. 00 o oo300. 00 o.o 1il OBJECT_ ��o`z~='~"936. 00 5.616.00 m um m'615 ~~ n°." 'p 0|�!-| ---�o'u4/.a6 74'=28.80 206. 04 123, 467. 37. 6 ' `. DIVISION TOTAL +ono.��uooo�N ��^_�140, 447. �o�`o�_���`vm��ma_ *� � � � FUND TOTAL o�7.axuoo 28, 556. H ^^^'°°, 88 206 04 205,''--- - |�------_-________ 956.08 42. 4 / ! ---'-------� -----'^ --''-------_----_i) / • � ' N CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 -t"2 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0024 / 4 TIME 11: 48: 36 FROM 12/01/91_ TO 12/31/91_ _______ DATE 02/14/92 • P 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 1') FUNO DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION .MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % _ 109 VEHICLE PARKING DIST 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT i1d ) 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER. 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 15,705.00 1,308.75 7,852.50 0.00 7,852.50 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 15,705.00 1,308.75 7,852.50 0.00 7,852.50 DIVISION TOTAL 15,705.00 1,308.75 7,852.50 0.00 7,852.50 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 15,705.00 1,308.75 7,852.50 • 0.00 7,852.50 3301.VEH_PKG_DIST DEPT: PKG_FACILITIES 50.0 50.0 50.0 d-• J 50.0 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR_SALARIES/MISC 16,501_00 _1,247.90 .6,963.33. --------------0.00............._...9,537.67 42.1 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 236.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 236.00 0.0 : 4 ; 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 236.00 388.37 388.37 0.00 ' 152.37- 164.5 4180 RETIREMENT 1,936.00 172.08 854 18 0 00. 1,081.82 .....44..1......, 4188 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,300.00 89.83 562.92 0.00 737.08 43.3 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 138.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 138.00 0.0 OBJECT.SUBTOTAL 20,347_00 1,898.18 8,768_80 0 00.__... 11,578.20 43.0 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT_SERVICE/PRI.VATE_ _82,500.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 82,500.00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 175.00 10.00 60.57 0.00 114.43 34.6 i ! 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,000.00 30.36 212.41 0.00 787.59 21.2 ,!...0 ' 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1,000.00 0.00 997 41 0.00 2.59 99.7 :.1 _ 1 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 629.00 52.00 312.00 0.00 317.00 49.6 ,1 . . OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2,804.00 92.36 1,582.39 0.00 1,221.61 56.4 1 kt 5400 EQUIPMENT t.,11 . 1 5420 DEPRECIATION -MCH & EQUIP 265.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 265.00 0.0 ....1 1 OBJECT SUBTqTAL 265 00 0 00 0 00 0,00 265.00 0.0 3, 1 41' 5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS i., 5620 DEPRECIATION/BLDGS&IMPRV 2c145.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 2, 145. 00______ __0. 0 . . OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2,145.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,145.00 0.0 4,811.63 22,742-78 814.08 58,943-14 28.5 4,811.63 22,742.78 814. 08 58. 943.14 28.5 , 4 DIVISION TOTAL 108,061.00 6,802.17 33,093.97 814.08 74,152.95 31.3 DEP AR TMENT_TOTAL___ __108,061_00 6,802.17 33,093 97 814 08 74,152_95 1 4[1 • 11) •••••••••••••• CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FIMANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) DATE 02/14/92 TIME 11:48:36 PAGE 0025 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE iIN!) DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 1) 109 PARK/NG FUND e 3301 VEH PK G DIST DEPT: PKG FACILITIES 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER FUND TOTAL 123,766.00 8,110.92 40, 946. 47 • 814. 08 82, 005. 45 33. 7 • z • P.)! 1,- I '!; • • , ! „ 0 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11: 48: 36 1 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 110 PARKING FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATER I ALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER _ 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 1. 319, 781. 00 109, 995. 84 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 319, 781. 00 109, 995. 94 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) f . FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91. _ DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENTr TOTAL 3302 PARKING ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102.REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 444,012 00 35.058..33_.__201,318.93 0 00 .242,693.07. 45.3 A .1 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 12,000.00 176.62 3,798.74 0.00 8,201.26 31.6 '1 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 7, 375. 00 0.00 O. 00 O. 00 7, 375. 00 O. 0 JI t 4 : . 4111•ACCRUAL_CASH_IN_ 7,375.00 2,195.63 4,970 43 0 00 2,404.57. 67.3 . 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 85,385.00 4,941 46,511 .32 .50 0.00 38,873.50 54.4 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4180 RETIREMENT 5,500.00 225.97 1,491.92 0.00 4,008.08 27.1 70,895.00 4.923.26. _23,729_00 .0.00_ 47,166.00 I j 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 2,240.00 280.57 2,709.61 0.00 469.61- 120.9 e 0 4187 UNIFORMS _______4188 EMPLOYEE_BENEFITS 3,900.00 62,520.00 42.00 _4,115.37 239.99 1,454.25 2,205.76 43.4 ;7- 25,634_17 0.00. 36,885.83 41.0 ....' 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,957.00 204.13 ' 1,219.04 ,..! 0.00 1,737.96 41.2 c H OBJECT SUBTOTAL • . 704,159.00 52,163.20 311,623.33 1,454.25 391,081.42 44.4 . .1 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1 4 1 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 27,300.00 1, 904. 76 12, 302. 24 0.00 14, 997. 76 45.0 OBJECT .SUBTOTAL 27,300_00 __1..904..76 12,302 24 O. 00 14, 997, 76 45. 0 . . 1 O. '1 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER !..1 . - .4304 TELEPHONE 3,500_00. 372_99 2,300 94 0.00 1,199.06 ,,A 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES a ' 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE " i ....1 .4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS H 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES t ' 1 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE DEPT• PAGE 0026 DATE 02/14/92 . 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % , 659, 975. 05 659, 975. 05 1,319,781.00 109,995.84 659,975.05 1,319,781.00 109,995.84 659,975.05 PKG_FACILITIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 659,805.95 659,805.95 659,805.95 0. 00 659, 805. 95 50.0 I :I 50.0 I 50.0 50.0 0 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE _ 4396 TRSFR OUT-INS.USER _CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400_EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 1 4 0.7.!------------ 70.000. 00 6.819. 90.i 23, 585. 30 13, 206. 47 33, 208. 23 52. 5 1 4, 000. 00 0. 00 628. 00 0. 00 12. 000. 00 154. 59 384. 29 7. 260. 00 404. 66 2. 596. 23 12. 600. 00 416. 53 4, 052. 07 500. 00-- 0. 00.._...._....i00. 00 _ 0. 00 _ 400. 00 _ 20. 0 1. 000. 00 0. 00 583. 14 0. 00 416. 86 58.3 1, 000. 00 0. 00 10. 00 0. 00 990. 00 1. 0 .., a 48. 429.. 00 4, 036. 00 24, 216. 00 .0 00 _ 24: 213. 00 50. 0 __ . H 160, 289. 00 12, 204. 67 58, 455. 97 18, 554. 77 83. 278. 26 48. 0 3.372.00 15.7 1,088.34 0.00 4,663.77 35.7 4,259.96 4,287.97 65.9 Is 700. 00 0. 00 1. 0. 00 1, 134. 82 565. 18 66. 7 IS JO 4.9 C CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH e!) FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0027 ' 41 TIME 11:48:36 FROM 12/01/91 _TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/14/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE IT); 0 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. . ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % 11;') FUND TOTAL 110 PARKING FUND • 3302 PARKING ENF DEPT: PK G FACILITIES 5400 EQUIPMENT __ _ _ 5403 VEHICLES 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 5420 DEPRECIATION -MCH & EQUIP 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 86,700.00 0.00 0.00 1,134.82 85,565.18 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS_ 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS .0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 _ . ... . DIVISION TOTAL... 978,448.00 66,272.63 382,381.54 21,143.84 574,922.62 41.2 Ha DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT TOTAL 978,448.00 66,272.63 382,381.54 21,143.84 574,922.62 41.2 it 2, 298, 229, 00 176, 268.47 1/.042, 356. 59 21, 143 84 1, 234, 728, 57 46. 2 _ .•, iir , 1 ;.0 9 ;111,0 H 41 • • VS • ) CITY OF HERMOSA I3EACH --1 F INANCE—FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BPAGE Y FUND) 0028 ,h TIME 11: 48: 36 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/14/92 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE !: ; FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP . YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT I ,1 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER • .. 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 1, 779, 433. 00 161, 875. 40 898, 179. 50 0. 00 881, 253. 50 50.4 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 779, 433. 00 161, 875. 40 898, 179. 50 0. 00 881, 253. 50 50.4 ' . .1 DIVISION TOTAL 1, 779, 433. 00 161, 875. 40 , 898, 179. 50 0. 00 881, 253. 50 50.4 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1, 779, 433. 00 161, 875. 40 898, 179. 50 0. 00 881, 253. 50 50. 4 ) FUND TOTAL__ 1,779, 433.00_, 161, 875. 40 898, 179 50 0 00 ___ 881, 253. 50 _ 50. 4 , 'Y ••0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH F I NANCE-FA434 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME 11: 4S: 26 FROM .12/01/91_ TO. 12/31.491____ FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPR I AT ION _ MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND,. ..._ ENCUMBRANCE 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MMT/SUPPORT (31 oi 9 , 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 34, 841. 00 2, 903. 42 17, 420. 52 0. 00 17, 420. 48 50. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 34, 841. 00 2, 903. 42 17, 420. 52 0. 00 17, 420. 48 50.0 0 PAGE 0029 4, DATE 02/14/92 _ 50.0?. OF YEAR COMPLETE ' UNENC BALANCE 7. DIVISION TOTAL 34, 841. 00 2, 903. 42 17, 420. 52 0. 00 17, 420. 48 50.0 , , e 1 - DEPARTMENT TOTAL 34, 841. 00 2, 903. 42 17, 420. 52 0. 00 17, 420. 48 50. 0 -1 .: • FUND TOTAL __.__._34.841. 00 2.903. 42 17, 420. 52 0. 00 17, 420. 48 50. 0 • i.4 - • 13t, 0) • 1 4 FINANCE—FA454 TIME 11:48:36 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0030 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 _ _ DATE 02/14/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE r FUND DIV OBJT. DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY.EXP. YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT . 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER _ - 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 2,071,185.00 1,563,432.08 1,930,592.48 0.00 140,592.52 93.2 r. OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2,071,185.00 1,563,432.08 1,930,592.48 0.00 140,592.52 93.2 I:: j DIVISION TOTAL 2,071,185.00 1,563,432.08 1,930,592.48 0.00 140,592.52 93.2 LI i 4 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2,071,185.00 1,563,432.08 1,930,592.48 0.00 140,592.52 93.2 w: LI ‘,.) FUND_TOTAL_2,071.185.00 1,563,432.08 _1,930,592_48 .0_00 140,592.52 _ _. 93.2 _____L' .:.1 • • • I • .1 :ix...2.iniestmatimariats CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH / FINANCE—FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAc,E TIME 11:48:36 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 0/14 50.0% OF 1/.1 (.0.1PLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALA:1(7U 7. 126 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND 8514 CIP 89-514 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 618,813.00 618,813.00 0.00 • 446,710.00 0.00 172,103.00 72.1 0.00 446,710.00 0.00 172,103.00 72.1 DIVISION TOTAL 658,898.00 • 1,169.92 447,879.92 0.00 211,01808... 67.9 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 658,898.00 1,169.92 447,879.92 0.00 211,018.08 67.9 • FUND TOTAL 658,898.00 1,169.92 447,879.92 0.00 21'1,018.08 67.9 40, 085. 00 1, 169. 92 1, 169. 92 40, 085. 00 1, 169. 92 1, 169. 92 • 0 •• .0 0.00 38,915.08 2.9 0.00 38,915.08 2.9 • 0 H 11); ' • = • • p/wAwcs-rA454 ---' TIME 11:48:36 | FUND DIV oaJr osaoe____-___ 127 az UTILITY USER TAX FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER CITY OF HsnmooA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91. APPROPRIATION mowr*Lvsxp''--_YTD _sxpwo.-___---ENCUMBRANCE DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER_ 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION, TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL momr/oupponr 1, 050, 000 00 PAGE 0032 1 DATE 02r14/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE U) `| BALANCEUNENC I�|� 87.500.00 525.000.00 0. 00 525, 000. 00 ',' 50. 0 on.o 1.050.000.00 87,500.00 ':25,000.00 0.00 525,000.00 50.0 :' .1 1, 050, 000. 00 87, 500. 00 525, 000. 00 o00 525, 000. 00 ---- 1,050^000 00 87,500.00 _525,000 00 0 oo-_--_-�5uo,000.mo.-__ 50.0 -_i' — / '°| |-'|'/ .i _ .� �`. '� q /" !~ .) /, I '. = a CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1, ft,Ncs-��o:o EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0033 0 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12,31,91 __ DATE 0e/14/92 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE .`,rM DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP _YTD cXPND.___ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % e /40 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GR --_-_ - 4/0/ HOUSING ns*Ao DEPT: OTHER -----------------'-- 0 ' ` 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE Ooo . --- -' OBJECT SUBTOTAL o»�om O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 DIVISION TOTAL O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 4703 CDBG ADMIN DEPT: OTHER 0. 00 0. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 o om 0.o 0. 0 . ` DIVISION TOTAL ,zoo 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ^ 0. 00 o.o DEPARTMENT TOTAL 0. 00-----'----------'-- ' --- '— 0. uo 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 FUND TOTAL 0 00 0. 00 0 00 0 00 o. 00 o.o to . .�i .�/ .J 41)'. `'. ,`0� 0' .,� —._ • ' '! • ..| .'| '.N� • 11, FINANCE-FA454 . TIME 11: 48:36 FUND DIV OBJT_DESCR_.- 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0034 ) FROM 12/01/91_._ TO 12/31/91 ________ DATE 02/14/92 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE !'.l APPROPRIATION__..--_ ._-_..___. MONTHLY EXPYTD _EXPND.. _ ENCUMBRANCE. UNENC BALANCE 7. 1 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 3401 DIAL A.RIDE DEPT:____PUBLIC..._TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC_.____-__-_19, 224. 00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE._BENEFITS 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 158, 755. 00 0. 00 40, 231.87 0. 00 118, 523. 13 25. 3 OBJECT_ SUBTOTAL 158,_755. 00 0 00 ___ 40, 231 87 0 00 118,_523._ 13 _-_...__ _.25..3 0. 00 936. 00 1, 482._00 219. 00 21, 261. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 522. 27_ _ - ._8, 363. 36 117. 07 117. 07 196. 94 1, 007. 75 110. 38 __,.-.595...93 17. 83 69. 73 1, 964. 49 10, 153. 84 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 0 0. 00 . .10, 860. 64 43. 5 0. 00 117. 07- 0. 0 0.00 71.75- 107.6 0 00 886. 07 . _____ 40..2.._._. 0. 00 149. 27 31. 8 0. 00 11, 707. 16 46. 4 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER _'.__. .4304 TELEPHONE 50...00._.____._____.__ 4. 16..._.__. 24 96 0 00 ______________ 25. 04 ___ _ _ .. 49. 9 4305 OFFICE_ OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 0.29 2.08 0.00 497.92 0.4 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 126.00 16.00 66.00 0.00 60.00 52.3 OBJECT_ SUBTOTAL 676 00 20 45 93 04 0 00 582.96 13..7__ DIVISION _.__.TOTAL 3402 COMMUTER BUS • 181, 292_00__-_-__-._1, 984 94 ___.___._...50, 478 75 DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 130, 813. 25 ___. __.__. 27. 8 J 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 2, 673. 00 224. 10 1, 350. 38 0. 00 1, 322. 62 50.5 �,/I 4111 ACCRUAL_ CASH.. IN _.___ -_____.0.00.___ .__.117.07-_____.___ 117..07-____ _..___0.00 ____ ..117.07____.__.. 0. 0 ...._.. 4180 RETIREMENT 321.00 71.73 356. 76 0. 00 35. 76- 111. 1 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 280.00 36.83 198.49 0.00 81. 51 70.8 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS-_--__ - L.15..00----.---. 1.36..--------__--.._5..54 -_-.--0..00 ____________ _.9.46_. -_.___36.9.__. - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3, 289. 00 216. 95 1, 794. 10 0. 00 1, 494. 90 54. 5 4200. CONTRACT._ SERVICES._-____ 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 20, 000. 00 4, 791. 50 9, 583. 00 0. 00 10, 417. 00 47.9 I I I, w w� m FIN.'NCE-FA454 TIME 11:48:36 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0035 • _.-FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 ._._ DATE 02/14/92 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ' APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP -____...YTD.-EXPND.. __ ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % I . ° 3402 COMMUTER BUS DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4200_CONTRACT_SERVICF_S OBJECT SUBTOTAL 20, 000. 00 4, 791. 50 4300 MATERIALS/.SUPPLIES/OTHER 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 DIVISION TOTAL 9, 583. 00 0. 00 5. 00- 0. 00 5. 00- 0. 00 23, 289. 00 5, 003. 45 3403 BUS PASS SUBSDY DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 10, 417. 00 47. 9 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 11, 377. 10 0. 00 O. 0 0. 0 11, 91 1. 90 48. 8 _ -.._. _. 4100 . PERSONAL__SER V I CES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 1, 693. 00 140. 16 835. 43 O. 00 857. 57 49. 3 4100 RETIREMENT 233.00 19.33 95.29 0.00 137.71 40.8 4188 _EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 294. 00 16. 49 97 57 O. 00 196. 43 33.1 ___ 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 24.00 2.02 8. 11 0.00 15.89 33. 7 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 244. 00 178. 00 1, 036. 40 O. 00 1, 207. 60 46. 1 1 ° I'' �° 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 14, 332. 00 1, 275. 00 4, 672. 00 O. 00 9, 660. 00 32. 5 OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 14, 332.001,275,00 _ 4.672. 00 O. 00 9, 660. 00 32. 5.-_ 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ..4396 TRSFR..OUT-INS.USER_.CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL :i ,t 122 • 145 • 745 00 ..-62. 00 .__.__- --- 372._00.--- O. 00_ __-____-- 373. 00 .... 49..9 745.00 62.00 372.00 0.00 373.00 49.9 DIVISION TOTAL 17, 321. 00 1, 515. 00 6, 080. 40 0. 00 11, 240. 60 35. 1 3405. FUND. EXCHANGEDEPT: PUBLIC_ TRANSI.T.__________,_____.___._ 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES -._ 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 110, 000. 00 O. 00 .__ O. 00 O. 00 110, 000. 000. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 110, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 110, 000. 00 O. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 110, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 110, 000. 00 O. O _3408 _COMMUTER_--XPRESSDEPT: 'PUBLIC TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR. SALARIES/MISC 1,_101,_00_-_.__94.02560. 87 O. 00 540. 13 50. 9 at •� 41, • 1 1 • 1F CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND) PAGE 0036 ) TIME 11:48:36 1 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 t . DATE 02/14/92 I , ' 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ! . HI FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND-______. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE Y. . . 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND .. , / ..) le 3409 COMMUTER XPRESS DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT .4100 PERSONAL_SERVICES 4120 RETIREMENT 152.00 16.48 81.44 0.00 70.56 53.5 412B EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 126.00 8.34 41.70 0.00 84.30 33.0 .: J .4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 0.00_ 1.36 5.45 0.00 5.45- . 0.0 ' OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1,379.00 120.20 689.46 0.00 689.54 49.9 1::•I , ; ,. ...• 4200.CONTRACT SERVICES 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL • , I 9, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 9, 000. 00 0. 0 HI 9, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 9, 000. 00 0.0 1::‘Ij DIVISION TOTAL 10,379.00 120.20 689.46 0.00 9,689.54 6.6 ..,.1j 3409 REC TRANSPTN DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT • • 1 s.; J .4100_PERSONAL_SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 1,275.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 1, 275. 00 0.0 HI • ;, , OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 275. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 1, 275. 00 0.0 : ,, i 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ;.1 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 13,144.001: '''' i 295.00 1,272.50 295.00 11,576.50 11.9 l'" OBJECT_SUBTOTAL 13,144_00 295_00 _1,272 50 295_00 11,576.50 11.9 r ' ! 1 FUND TOTAL , ' J DIVISION _TOTAL 14, 419. 00_ 295. 00 _L 272.50 _295. 00____...12, 851.50 10.8 ' 1 , DEPARTMENT TOTAL 356,700.00 2,918.59 69,298.21 295.00 286,506.79 19.6 1:: J 356, 700. 00 8, 918. 59 69, 898. 21 295. 00 286, 506. 79 19. 6 1 H -1 1;1 0: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 7) FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0037 TIME 11: 49: 36 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/14/92 ., 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ' 1 9 3 I t 1 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 1n0 GRANT FUND APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YID EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT _ 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 40,000.00 3,333.33 19.999.98 0.00 20.000.02 49.9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 40,000.00 3,333.33 19,999.98 0.00 20,000.02 49.9 • , • ; 0 DIVISION TOTAL 40,000.00 3,333.33 19,999.98 0. 00 20, 000. 02 49.9 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 40.000. 00 3. 333. 33 19, 999. 98 0. 00 20.000. 02 49.9 14° FUND TOTAL 40.000.00 3, 333. 33 198999.98 0.00 20,000.02 49.9 • ::• • • • 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ---I FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0038 • ) TIME 11:48:36 FROM 12/01/91.TO 12/31/91______ .__ DATE 02/14/92 L. 1 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 5 & • FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 155 CROSSING GUARD FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER APPROPR I ATION_ MONTHLY. EXP. _ ___YTD E.XPND._ . ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. .!4; i I 7 J n DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER •' I 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 H OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 1. 00 O. 0 :.'j J DIVISION TOTAL 1. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 1. 00 O. 0 o ,,I J DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 00 0. 0 J 2102 _CROSS ING_ GUARD DEPT • POLICE_ 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC_ .____ 12, 572_ 00. 934. 80 5, 663. 021 i _ 0.00 ------------.6.908.98 __ 45.0 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 180.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 180. 00 388. 37 388. 37 O. 00 208. 37- 215.7 ___4113 .CROSSING GUARDS 34, 209..00.___.3, 010. 80 • 13, 287. 62. 0 00 __ 20.921. 38 ____ 38. B 4180 RETIREMENT 1, 394. 00 128. 91 652. 03 O. 00 741. 97 46.7 ..! 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 2, 121. 00 186. 66 800. 65 O. 00 1, 320. 35 37.7 •.I J 4187 UNIFORMS _ ___ . __ _ _ 300. 00 0_00. 59. 94 0.00 ___ _ _ _____ 240. 06 19.9 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1, 200. 00 81. 61 461. 14 O. 00 738. 86 38. 4 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 437.00 43.65 189.05 0.00 248.95 43.0 OBJECT_ SUBTOTAL 52, 593. 00_ H j _4, 774_80 21, 500_82 _________ O. 00 31, 092. 18 40.8 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES _____4201 CONTRACT_SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL • 'J 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER .1 2, 000. 00 O. 00 973 83 600. 00 0. 00 110. 00 2, 600. 00 0. 00 1, 083. 83 0 00 ______1, 026..17------------48.6 _ 0.00 490.00 18.3 i.. O. 00 1, 514. 17 41.6 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHS 2, 665. 00. 222. 00 1, 332. 00 0. 00 1, 333. 00 49. 9 - - OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2..665 00 222 00 _______1, 332_00 0. 00 1, 333.00 •I , DIVISION _TOTAL 57, 858. 00 ______ _4, 996. 80 .23, 916-65 0 00 33, 941. 35_____ DEPARTMENT TOTAL 57, 858. 00 4 996. 80 23, 916. 65 O. 00 33, 941. 35 41. 3 FUND TOTAL - "I 57, 859. 00 4, 996. 80 23, 916. 65 O. 00 33, 942. 35 41.3 _ do . . , , • ',. s , to , I NANCE-FA454 TIM 11:48::16 14 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 FUND 0 IV OBJT .DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY 160 SEWER FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 1, 288, 428. 00 110, 158. 89 627, 474. 70 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 288, 428. 00 110, 159. 89 627, 474. 70 EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3102 SEWER/ST DRAIN 1, 289, 428. 00 110, 158. 89 DEPT: 627,474.70 PAGE 0039 DATE 02/14/92 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNENC BALANCE 7. 0. 00 660, 953. 30 0. 00 660, 953, 30 0. 00 1, 288, 428. 00 110, 158. 89 627, 474. 70 ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 660, 953. 30 0. 00 660, 953. 48. 7 48.7 48. 7 • n I 84) ;• et) 45.7 •",j 91. 5 98.6 57.6 36. 8 30 48. 7 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC _ _89, 211.00 6, 350. 66 _40, 830. 85 0. 00 48, 380. 15 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1, 800. 00 224. 40 1, 648. 31 0. 00 151. 69 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 3, 545. 00 0. 00 3, 497. 00 0. 00 1 48. 00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1, 445. 00 .._321.7Q 833 52 0. 00 611.48 4180 RETIREMENT 13, 670. 00 938. 54 5, 040. 99 0. 00 8, 629. 01 4195 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11 r 304. 00 691. 72 4. 303. 68 O. 00 71000. 32 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 492. 00 33. 86 189. 86 0. 00 302. 14 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 121, 467. 00 8, 560. 88 56, 344. 21 0. 00 65, 122. 79 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 12, 015. 00 1. 232. 00 3. 982. 00 0. 00 8, 033. 00 33. 1 ' 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT _3, 255. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00.__3, 255. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 15, 270. 00 1, 232. 00 3.982. 00 0. 00 11, 288. 00 26. 0 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER , , 1 4303 UTILITIES 500.00 71. 19 277.39 0.00 222.61 55.4 ,..' 12-1 .._. 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 29, 654. 00 (3, 600. 00 210. 58 4, 000. 00 1, 100. 00. 2, 471. 00 83. 21 0. 00 14, 826. 00 2, 219. 24 206. 04 6, 174. 72 2S. 2 436. 62 590. 89 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 14, 828. 00 3, 409. 11 663. 38 39. 6 49.9 14. 7 T.' 40: • OBJECT SUBTOTAL . • 43, 854. 00 2, 835. 98 18, 350. 14 206. 04 25, 297. 82 42. 3 • • 0. 0 38.0 -1 38. 5 • , • 46.3 . 0 DIVISION TOTAL 0011:'1 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 180. 591. 00 12, 628 86 78, 676. 35 180, 591. 00 12, 628. 86 78, 676. 35 FUND TOTAL 1, 469, 019. 00 122, 787. 75 706, 151. 05 .1.'4 _ 111. t • !!) . -- 206.04 101, 70B. 61 43. 6 206. 04 206. 04 101, 708. 61 43.6 • 762, 661. 91 48. 0 • Tb CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) f PAGE 0040 ) TIME 11: 48: 3.6 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/14/92 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE n\ I FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION l'!) MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND ', I 1 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT .4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER • 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 37, 000. 00 3, 083. 33 18, 499. 98 0. 00 18, 500. 02 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 37, 000. 00 3, 083. 33 18, 499. 98 O. 00 18, 500. 02 DIVISION TOTAL 37, 000. 00 3, 083. 33 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 37, 000. 00 3, 083. 33 2103 SPEC INVESTGTNS DEPT. _POLICE , 18, 499. 98 18, 499. 98 49.9 49.9 .J 0. 00 18, 500. 02 49. 9 O. 00 18, 500. 02 49. 9 J 14 ., .J 1:•.! J 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4103 REGULAR .SALARIES/SAEETY_ 186..570_ 00___..i, 671. 00._95, 952. 00 0 00 ____ 100, 618. 00 _ _ 46. b ...! 4105 SPEC IAL DUTY PAY 10, 560. 00 880. 00 4, 840. 00 O. 00 5, 720. 00 45. 8 1 4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 38, 000. 00 3, 462. 63 . 21, 768. 76 O. 00 16, 231. 24 57. 2 .4109 . COURT TIME 0 00_ O. 00 614.88 0 00 .614. 86- O. 0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4, 000. 00 O. 00 5, 025. 00 O. 00 1, 025. 00- 125. 6 4115 EXTRA TIME O. 00 O. 00 2, 798. 95 O. 00 2, 798. 95- O. 0 .4180 RETIREMENT _56, 615. 00___._.4, 685. 35 21, 017. 53 0 00 35, 597. 47 _ 37. 1 4187 UNIFORMS 2, 800. 00 470. 41 1, 520. 53 O. 00 1, 279. 47 54. 3 c . 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 12, 000. 00 879. 85 5, 428. 93 O. 00 6, 571. 07 45. 2 ! . 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1, 260. 00 213.25 .912. 67_ OBJECT SUBTOTAL 311, 805. 00 26, 262. 49 149, 679. 25 O. 00 347. 33_ 72.4 L ! O. 00 161, 925. 75 48. 0 , 0 t.4200, CONTRACT SERVICES_ .•. . 1 ' ! 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 5, 000. 00 159. 39 994. 85 O. 00 4, 005. 15 19. 8 ..;' OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 000. 00 159. 39 994. 85 O. 00 4, 005. 15 19. 8 , i'--:' J • ::.' 4304 TELEPHONE El, 448. 00 4310 MOTOR. FUELS AND LUBES 1, 557. 92 6, 373. 71 0.00 75.4 :•,, _) 5, 000_00 _781. 85 2, 855. 16 2, 074. 29 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 0 00______ 2, 144. 84 _. 57. 1 ___ . :-. , - O. 00 258. 00 1, 589. 26 O. 00 1, 589. 26- O. 0 I ' 4316 TRAINING •., 4322_UNCLASSIFIED 5, 000. 00 500. 00 23.00 989.00 0.00 489.00- 197.8 i , J O. 00 __2.445. 00 0 00_ 2, 555. 00 ______48. 9 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 16, 270. 00 1, 356. 00 8, 136. 00 O. 00 8, 134. 00 50. 0 0 • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 35, 218. 00 3, 976. 77 22, 388. 13 O. 00 12, 829. 87 63. 5 ',,, i JI- , - 5400 EQUIPMENT , • 0, 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 i 2, 500. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 2, 500. 00 O. 0 I, , 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500. 8, 099. 00 0 00 8,956. 52. 832. 44 _1, 689. 96- 120. 8_ I - 5403 VEHICLES 22, 050. 00 O. 00 1 O. 00 0.00 22.050,00 0.0 , • °H OBJECT SUBTOTAL 32, 649. 00 O. 00 8, 956. 52 832. 44 22, 860. 04 29. 9 L .. • i ••,I 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER • 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 0 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:48:36 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0041 0 FROM. 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 ._ DATE 02/14/92 1) ' 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE H k ' • Vil I . FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION_I MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND 2103 SPEC INVESTGTNS I ' • I ; 9:1,1 DEPT: POLICE 6700 INTEREST 6700 INTEREST 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 0. 00 2, 400. 00 0. 00 2, 400. 00- 0. 00 2, 400. 00 0. 00 2, 400. 00- 384, 672. 00 30, 398. 65 184,618.75 832.44 0. 0 0. 0 199, 220. 91 48. 2 384, 672. 00 30, 398. 65 184, 618. 75 832. 44 199, 220. 81 48.2 421,672.00 33,481.99 203,118.73 832.44 217, 720. 83 48. 3 _ ;11 ; ,ft.! ;.;'• • 'Li i. ei !... 40 , 0 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:48:36 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0042 _FROM.... 12/01/91 T0__12/31/_91.__ _ DATE 02/14/92 50.0% _- 50.O% OF YEAR COMPLETE LI FUND DIV OBJT DF_SCR_ -__ APPROPRIATION. 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 2202 HYDRANT UPGRADE MONTHLY EXP __.._YTD EXPND.-.-.._.__._.-.._ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE DEPT: FIRE 4200 CONTRACT..SERVICES_.___.______ 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL l 100, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 44, 396. 00 55, 604. 00 44. 3 100, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 44, 396. 00 55, 604. 00 44. 3 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND_TOTAL 100, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 44, 396. 00 55, 604. 00 44. 3 100, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 44, 396. 00 55, 604. 00 44.3 _I 100,_000_00 0 00 0 00 44,396-00_____ _55,604.00 ..._...._.44.3___ 1 �� FINANCE-r�«n� CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH .~ f!..1 TIME 11:4o�oa EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0043 � FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 , ^ DATE 02/14/92 ' 41 7-- / - 50.0z OF YEAR COMPLETE 11FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD sxpmo ENCUMBRANCE � • 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 8137 GIP. 85-137 osPILsTnssr/sAFsrv 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT -aEnvzus/pnIvArs___6n5.oa7.00 0. 00 635, 000. 00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 635.067.o0 -'--------0mo ----'aom.000'mo--------nom 4300 mArsnIALo/ouPpLzsn/or*sn-_ 4316 TRAINING ��---'----- - ---- - - ' --- -- -' -' OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 oa.00------ 0. 00 - 38.oo- uoo 0. 00 38. 00 0.00 ._____�38.00- 67.00 - 99.9 DIVISION TOTAL 8141 cIp 89-141 DEPT: 4200 CONTRACT _SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 155' 564��----------- -- � o oo OBJECT SUBTOTAL 155, 564. 00 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 8142 CIP 89-142 15o 564. 00 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 635, 038. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 : ---_-__4oumCONTRACT SERVICES _-__-__-_' i | 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE ��, 000_00'---------'------ ------ ��''". � mo OBJECT SUBTOTAL o� 000 oo'o����o no.nn���o �. � . 30, 341. 63 30.331.63 /l --- Ili DIVISION TOTAL 35, 000. 00 30'341. 63 30.331.63 |�j . 8144 czp 90-14* DEPT: � �� STREET/SAFETY o. u o. o 29. 00 99. 9 155, 564. 00 155, 564. 00 0. 0 o. o |0/ • o • • 01' _� '| N� ,| ', N� 0. 00 1:5.564.00 oo `@N 0. 00 4.668.37 oa. 6 0. 00 4, 668. 37 e6.6 ' 0. 00 ``� �..41' ^.. '_ ------- _ -__---'-----'--'------� --�'-------'i'|-,^" NN�� 4100 PERSONAL SERV ICES 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY O. 00 O. 00 u.000.ar -O_00 2�332� �r� O. 0|' 1) 4185 ...^~- ~~^""^.,`, ^ C o` O. 00 o oo 144. 64 O. 00 ��«. 6+- m.n :^0��ov m�mzo�esaswsEIIo O. 00 o on oo o� o 00 33. 82- w.o|~onJsrr'nuaTpTAL O. 00 o oo2. 511. o mo 2.511. 33-.-O '4_'_*000CONTRACT SERVICES /. 41 . ----'-----------'-'------------------------�---'--- -------'''-----------_-- __-_-' -- --' - ' - 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE o45' 011 00 O. 00 29. 30 O. 00 8«4.98{_7oO. 0 e[OBJECT SUBTOTAL `a45. m��. uo O. oo 29. om O. 00 __844.9e1. 70 O. u , e «b|.`._ __ _ DIVISION __TOTAL _ 845.011.00 O. 00 2, 540. 63 O. 00 842, 470. O. 3 � r�- --'------'---'---------------- '------'------------'-------------_-_�_. __-_ '-/- mv [�-----_.� he '- --- �c_ `�---- / @� . 0� ' � . --- -----'--'----� �' 0 " 0 • . � �� cl• FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11: 48: 36 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 8146 CIP. 89-146 APPROPRIATION DEP_T:_STREET/SAFETY MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. PAGE 0044 DATE 02/14/92 1111 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 5, 000. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 _ OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 5, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 8150 CIP 89-150 DEPT:___ STREET/SAFETY • 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0 00 0 00 0. 00 0. 00 20, 000. 00 0. 00 474. 66 20, 000. 00 0. 00 474. 66 __ 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 0. 0 O. 0 5, 000. 00 0. 0 r,-- .-.-. J 0. 00 0. 0 1-•' 0. 00 0. 0 _.. 11, 801. 42 7, 723. 92 61.3 11, 801. 42 7, 723. 92 61.3 :. J DIVISION TOTAL 8151 CIP 89-151 20, 000. 00 0. 00 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY ._____4200._CONTRACT_SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE i DIVISION TOTAL 8152 CIP 152 OBJECT SUBTOTAL I , 40, 000. 00 0. 00 40, 000. 00 0. 00 40, 000. 00 0. 00 474.66 11, 801. 42 7, 723. 92 61.3 J 0. 00 0. 00 40, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 40, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 40, 00Q. 00 0. 0 .DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE t. OBJECT SUBTOTAL D I S 1014 TOTAL :!! t. , • ^ 15, 000. 00 15, 000. 00 15, 000. 00 • 8165 CIP 87-165 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT .SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 15, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 15, 000. 00 0. 0 O. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 15, 000. 00 0. 0 17, 545. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17, 545. 00 0. 00 O. 00 • 0. 00 17, 545. 00 0. 0 0. 00 17, 545. 00 0. 0 • J 1 • • F INANCE—FA454 TIM = 1 1:48: 36 _ a CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (13Y FUND) PAGE 0045 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/14/92 IIIIV 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE -i,,\ MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. I. O' 1'I I. I — I ', O.00 - --------0'- �O _----_.- ----...0: 00 .......... 17, 949. 00 O. 0 ... _..__ _f ".I 1 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND DIVISION TOTAL 8170 CIP 87-170 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES APPROPRIATION 17, 545. 00 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 221, 037. 00 20, 723. 42 220, 451. 53 0. 00 585. 47 99- 7 _ OBJECT SUBTOTAL -._.....-- ----__—.----221, 037,00 ._.__.... _.._20, 723. 42 _ __ 220, 451..53_---__-- 0. 00 _-_............._ 585. 47 .... 99. 7 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER B JECT SUBTOTAL MATERIALS 8, 284. 00 0. 00 8, 283. 15 0. 00 0. 85 99.9 _____ 0I OBJECT SUBTOTAL 8, 284. 00 0. 00 8, 283. 15 0. 00 0. 85 99. 9 !"! DIVISION TOTAL 229, 321. 00 DEPARTMENT -TOTAL 1,997,508. 00 8201 CIP 85-201 DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 20, 723. 42 228, 734. 68 0. 00 586. 32 99. 7 51, 065. 05 897,119, 60----_____ 11, 801-._42 1, 088, 586. 98 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 22, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ______ —_—OBJECT_SUBTOTAI 22, 000 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 45.15 eI 22, 000. 00 22, 000. 00 0. 0 0._0 DIVISION TOTAL 22, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 22, 000. 00 _- 0. 0 __ DEPARTMENT TOTAL 22, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 22, 000. 00 0. 0 8406 CIP 88-406 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER ' 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 1, 138, 428. 00 8, 693. 93 728, 671. 96 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 138, 428. 00 8, 693. 93 728, 671. 96 DIVISION TOTAL 1, 138, 428. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1, 138, 428. 00 8506 CIP.86-506___.__ _DEPT: ____PARKS 8, 693. 93 8, 693. 93 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE_ • _5,.000. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 728, 671. 96 728, 671. 96 1, 366. 00 1, 366. 00 t) 0. 00 409, 756. 04 64. 0 0. 00 409, 756. 04 64. 0 Al) 0. 00 409, 756. 04 64. 0 O. 00 409, 756. 04 64.0 0. 00 3, 634. 00___ 27. 3 ___ 0. 00 3, 634. 00 27. 3 to • 0 :I+ ` rzm^wcs-FA4o4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TIME 11: 48: EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE ~~^^ __� _�,, FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 f ~~-� 7 DATE 02/1*/92 II 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY sxpYTo EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % ' ) 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND |�i ) ) 8506 C IP 867506 DEP I•__P_ARKS In 4309 MAINTENANCE MATER zALS ' __--_-1o.000.00 _--'-'-- _ [/ /___ 4300 wArsnzALo/auppLzEo/or*sn OBJECT SUBTOTAL 257. .17..91 o om a.00� o� nr' � ''f 10.000.oo 257. 63 3, 717. 91 0. 00 6, 282. 09 37. 1 !] 5400 EQUIPMENT /• _1 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN *500 -�����ou-- -- m. wo ----1' or�c� -'---- --- 00 3, 624. 65O. 5 or nooJscr SUBTOTAL 5,m00. 00 0. 00 . 1, 375. 35 0. 00 3, 624. 65 27. 5 .-� 8508 mIp 87-508 DEPT: PARKS --''------- ----- / 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES � 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 66, 000. mo o ou--------'--'-----------------------' -- ' - --^` o��scr auoror�� 66, 000. 00 o� 00 o.mo o'om 66.000.00 o.m 0. 00 0. 00 aa.000.ou 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 66, 000. 00 • | /� _______-_-_�42om'c . 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL , 0. 00 0. 00 111, 500. ou 0. 00 66.000.00 0. 0 0. 00 111, 500. mn o�u . ~| 0. 00 0. 00 111, 500. on ��� - i ^ � ` ~ -- _) DIVISION TOTAL u�.000 om 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 111, 500. mm o.o ] / 8513 CIP 89-513 DEPT: PARKS ----'!- - . 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES i. _.) ^. 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 50.000.00 u oo u mo -------0- -------- '-- ---- - - - - -� OBJECT SUB -TOTAL 50, 000. 00 1_, ` ,• " DIVISION •ror*L 50, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 50, 000. 00 0. 0 [� 8515 C IP 89-515 DEPT: PARKS _______ --__«000-oowrnAnrSERVICES_ _'_-_-- 4om1 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1.040.00 0. 00 0. 00 1.040.00 0. 00 0. 00 1.o4o.mm [j . 0. 00 100 o , 0. 00 100.0 7.1 FIwAwcs-rA454 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME /1:48:36 - PAGE 0047 F� 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 _ DATE 02/14/9250.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE �N� DIV .�� DESCR ~~~. "==`" AppnopnzArzow MONTHLY EXP YTD sxpmo ENCUMBRANCE owcmo BALANCE � 303 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND -----------�----�--- --------------- ------ -- ^ 8515ozp e9-515 ospT• PARKS ^ I. @� /,. 5500 LAND .`' 55uo 5501 LAND �� 2, 238,`. 000 00 ---- -0. 00 d. o00 0. 00 oo -�. . OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, uuu.vao.00 0. 00 200,u00. 00 0. 00 2,o38, 960. 00 8. 9 0.00 200, 000 00 0. 00 2.038.960.00 a9 L' • -----------------' - ---- - - ______ |.' DIVISION TOTAL 2, 240, 000. 00 0. � � ��m��! �'m��~'~.,.,~.�"" 8.9 wp_ __ _ DEPARTMENT TOTAL � �ar mo--- ----------'----'------- ----- �� ^ . 500. 257. 63 206, 459. 26 1.o40'�0---2,'2��''000'74�-----8-3 8601 czp_m6-601----'-_�'���r�mo w�nm�oo - IL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES |1.] - 4201 CONTRACT_ SERVICE/PR IvArs_-__-_e.000.00/I:,-,, ''� 0. �a -----. .~~.~.~- o*o� 00 -----x.uoo� 14 45.o - 2, . o. oo 76� aa 840on 1, 083. 14 45.8 0 DIVISION TOTAL 2.000.00 0. 00 76. 86 8604cIp86-60*_ DEPT: __nLoeoo/GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 oowrnAcT.osnvzcs*"nIu+IE17'533.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 17, 533. oon 0. 00 488. 00 488. 00 0.0017,045.002. 7 0. 00 17.045.00 e. 7 DIVISION TOTAL 17, 533. 00 0. 00 488oo 0. 00 m' 043.00 --- u.7 8606 °," 87-60" --__ 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ../m-S/ouppLzso/or*sn *nop MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 0 00 116*9- o oo e|� DIVISION( TOTAL oaoo ozp e9-608 DEPT: oLooa &._ GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES -__4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 21, 000. 00 0. 00 ! / NN 0. om 0. om /x o- • 0. 00 0. 00 um M [ N0 0. 00 0. 00 00 _ _ 0. 021, 000. .0 D ] • ^ ------_--__-_-�z CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0048 TIME 11:48:36 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/14/92 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE._. FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND ,I DIVISION.__ TOTAL_ 21,000_00 0 00 0 00 8609 CIF S9-609 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 30,000.00 . OBJECT SUBTOTAL 30,000.00_ _.DIVISION.,_. TOTAL 0: 00 21,. 000. 00 I n 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 _.... 0. 00 _._. 0. 00 30,_000 00 0 00__ _O._00 8615 CIP 89-615 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL _ 0 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE_ MATERIALS 374 00 0. _ 103.60 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 374.00 0.00 270.40 0.00 103.60 30, 000. 00 30, 000. 00 0...00._._ ___._..30, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 --..0. 00 0.00 0 00 _---------__ _... 0.00 0.00 DIVISION TOTAL 374. 00 0. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE_ _45,000..00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 45,000.00 DIVISION TOTAL 45,000.00 0 00 0.00 270. 40 0 00 0.00 0. 00 103. 60 0 00_-___._... 45, 000. 00 0. 00 45, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 45, 000. 00 0. 0 0.0 _ a lb 0.0 0.0 72. 2 72. 2 72. 2 0. 0 DEPARTMENT TOTAL.____115,_907_00._.__-_116._49-835..26114,231.74_ _ __ 8701 CIP 89-701 DEPT: OTHER PROJECTS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 15,000.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 15,000_00 _________._._._. _0.00 _DIVISION_. TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL ' 15, 000. 00 15, 000. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0...00 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 15, 000. 00 15, 000. 00 0.0 0. 0 15, 000. 00-.__. _ 0. 0 _ 15, 000. 00 0. 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 • EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0049 TIME 11:48:36 iFROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 f DATE 02/14/92 II 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE f!, - FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION . .._ MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X 305 INSURANCE FUND 0 11 I -.1 8701 CIP 89-701 DEPT; OTHER PROJECTS 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES FUND TOTAL 5,776,343.00 59,900.12 1,833,086.08 13,681.42 3,929,575.50 31.9 41, i • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:48:36 1 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 705 INSURANCE FUND 1209 LIABILITY INS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 APPROPRIATION DEPTL____MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR_SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. PAGE DATE 50. 07. OF 0050 02/14/92 YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 24.540.00 1:_981.98 11.950.12 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 730. 00 0. 00 868. 03 0. 00 3, 384. 00 273. 32 1.• 382. 13 0.00 3, 972. 00 218. 72 1, 310. 34 0. 00 32. 626. 00 2. 474. 02 15, 510. 62 0. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT_SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE. OPER. SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,005.00 43f6 TRAINING 250.00 4324 .CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 88.000_00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 89.555.00 12, 589. 88 0.00 138.03- 2,001.87 2,661.66 17,115.38 362,630.00 12,632.16 262,290.62 0.00 100, 339. 362.630.00_ 12,632.16 _262,290.62 0.00 100.339. 48. 6 .. 0. 0 118. 9 40. 8 32. 9 47. 5 A • .1 1 38 72.3 38 72.3. 300. 00 19. 92 218. 28 _ O. 00......81.72 0.00 185.00 0.00 820.00 0.00 114.00 0.00 1 136.00 8..916_ 76 ' 17. 944 41 0 00 70. 055. 59 8, 936. 68 18, 461. 69 0. 00 71, 093. 31 DIVISION TOTAL 1210 AUTO/PROP/BONDS 3 484481/. 00 24. 042. 86 DEPTI_ MGMT/SUPPORT_ 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 .CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 27,000.00 1.052.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 27,000.00 1,052.00 57 ( 4300..MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1,42, 296,262.93 20, 61700 20. 617. 00 0. 00 188, 548. 07 72.7 18.4 45.6 20. 3 • •." 20.6 1,1 0. 00 6. 383. 00....76.3 0. 00 6. 383. 00 76.3 10, 500. 00 10, 500. 00 0. 00 4. 866. 72 0. 00 5, 633. 28 46. 3 0. 00 4. 866. 72 0. 00 5, 633. 28 46. 3 DIVISION TOTAL 37,500.00 1215 UNEMPLOYMENT- DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT I 4100 PERSONAL_SERVICES ,A 4186 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1, 052. 00 7, 700. 00 0. 00 7, 700. 00 0. 00 7 700. 00 0. 00 25,483.72 1, 726. 00 1, 726. 00 1. 726. 00 ) • 0.00 12,016.28 67.9 O. 00 5, 974. 00 22. 4 O. 00 5. 974. 00 22. 4 0. 00 5. 974. 00 22. 4 jJ .1.tj :5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH F I NANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0051 TIME 11: 48: 36 FROM 12/01/91 TO 12/31/91 DATE 02/14/92 . 41 ___ . 50.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE .. / FUND DIV ODUT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. I', • .. ti 705 INSURANCE FUND - . 1217 WORKERS _COMP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 17) 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 31, 409. 00 2, 779. 28 _16, 712: 86 0. 00 14, 696. 14 53. 2 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 61.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.00 0.0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 869. 00 0. 00 868. 03 0. 00 0. 97 99. 8 4180 RETIREMENT 4,301.00 381.69 1,919.77 0.00 2,381.23 _ 44.6 4182 WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR 290,000.00 84,070.53 228,725.66 0.00 61,274.34 78.8 • 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6,834.00 402.00 2,337.32 0.00 4,496.68 24.2 I,.. • •-: _ OBJECT SUB:TOTAL 333, 474. 00 87, 633, 50 250, 563. 64 0. 00 82, 910. 36 75. 1 14'1 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES _ .4201 CONTRACT _SERVICE/PRIVATE _.47,000. 00 7, 095. 40 37, 190. 61 0 00 9, 809. 39 . 79. 1 r, • 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 0. 00 0. 00 406. 59 0. 00 406. 59- 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 47, 000. 00 7, 095. 40 37, 597. 20 0. 00 9, 402. 80 79. 9 4300 MATER I ALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 400.00 5.76 94.44 0.00 305.56 23.6 4315 MEMBERSHIP 45.00 0. 00 45 00 0. 00__ _ 0. 00 ._ _ _100. 0 4316 TRAINING 2, 000. 00 0. 00 453. 38 0. 00 1, 546. 62 22.6 : I / OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 445. 00 5. 76 592. 82 0. 00 1, 852. 18 24. 2 1-. DIVISION TOTAL 382, 919. 00 94, 734. 66 288, 753. 66 0. 00 94, 165. 34 I ' 00 1218 MEDICARE DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES I 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 * OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.0 ..„ DEPARTMENT TOTAL 912, 930. 00 119, 829. 52 612, 226. 31 0. 00 300, 703. 69 67.0 9) FUND TOTAL 912, 930. 00 119, 829. 52 612, 226. 31 0. 00 300, 703. 69 67. 0 REPORT TOTALS 29, 420, 809. 00 3, 737, 244. 95 14, 339, 664. 38 139, 296. 92 14, 941, 847. 70 49. 2 I• 2 ' DIVISION TOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 4) • SALES TAX PER CAPITA 1991 SELECTED CITIES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR FROM: CITY TREASURER RE: MID YEAR BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 1992 For Fiscal Year 1991-92 my office has made the following adjustments to reduce revenue expenditures as follows: 1. voluntarily reduced City Treasurer pay by 5% 2. reduced Contract Services account requirement by $500.00 3. reduced Membership account by $185.00 4. reduced Conference Expense account by $500.00 The City Treasurer has and will continue to pay all conference expenses as well as all travel costs, mileage, lodging. etc. Additionally we were able to increase our interest revenue estimates by $225,000.00. My office reduced its budget by approximately 2%. Approp. Reduced 4201 Contract Services $ 2,000.00 $ 500.00 4315 Membership 185.00 185.00 4317 Conference Expense 500.00 500.00 3401 Interest Account 600,000.00 +225,000.00 City Treasurer c.c. Mayor and City Council City Manager SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 5 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council '49a - /ebs February 19, 1992 City Council Meeting of February 25, 1992 Amendment of the Penalty Provisions for Delinquent Business License Taxes and Commencement of Business Without a License Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading and introduce the attached ordinance. Background The City Council, at the regular meeting of February 11, 1991, directed staff to prepare an ordinance to amend penalties related to business licenses. Analysis The current municipal code provisions for delinquent business license taxes mandate a twenty (20) percent penalty for each thirty days the tax is delinquent. There is no maximum accrual for the penalty. Concern has been expressed for situations where, due to periodic audit, it is discovered that a business has submitted an incorrect license tax in the past and the amount of penalty far exceeds the amount of the original tax due. The proposed revision would still provide a significant incentive to pay business license taxes correctly and on time. The penalty would be capped at seventy (70) percent or one thousand dollars ($1,000.00 ) so that penalties would never exceed the original license tax due nor government code restrictions on imposed penalties. A survey of surrounding cities (attached) indicates that no two cities use the same penalty procedure. The proposed penalty amount would place Hermosa Beach near the lower end of the range of penalties imposed by other area cities. Alternatives 1) Increase or decrease the proposed penalty amount; however the maximum penalty should still not exceed $1,000.00 as previously indicated by the City Attorney. Concur: Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Respectfully Submitted, William Grove, Director Building and Safety CITY OF: Hawthorne Torrance Redondo Beach Initial Penalty 25% per month 1% every three days 1 - 30 days = 20% 31 - 60 days = 40% 61 or more = 60% El Segundo 20% per month Lawndale 25% Manhattan Bch 10% Maximum Penalty 100% 50% 60% 100% 200% No maximum § 17-20 LICENSES § 17-21 10, 11, 12, 13, 14(a), 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 19(a)); Classification "B," (Groups 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, -8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25); Classification "C," (Groups 1, 2, and - - 3); Classification "D," (Groups, 1, 2, 3, 4,, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11); Classification "E," (Group 1); Classification "F," (Groups 1 and 2)), Sections 17-19.1, 17-19.2, 17-50.3, 17-52; and Chapter 30 (Tax- es), Section 30-40 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. (Ord. • No. 88-941, § 4, 11-8-88) Editor's note -Ord. No. 88-941, § 4, adopted by the voters on Nov. 8, 1988, did not specify manner of codification; hence, upon the city's instruction, such provi•_ - _.-- sions have been designated by the editor as § 17-19.3. The annual adjustments required by such provisions are not set out herein, but are on file and available for inspection in the offices of the city clerk and the business license inspector. - Sec. 17-20. Penalty for delinquencies. -- To every license tax mentioned or provided for in this - chapter remaining unpaid following its date of expiration, there shall be added a penalty of twenty (20) percent of the amount of such tax for each thirty (30) days thereafter until paid, and the said penalty shall be collected and the payment thereof shall be enforced in the same manner as other taxes are collected and the payment thereof enforced. (Ord. No. N.S. 212, § 19; Ord. No. N.S. 301, § 16, 3-7-67) Sec. 17-20.1. Penalty for commencement of business without license. Any person who carries on any business without first having obtained a license therefor shall pay a penalty of twenty (20) percent of the prescribed license tax, and an additional twenty (20) percent penalty shall be added each thirty (30) days thereafter until paid, and the said penalty shall be collected and the payment hereof shall be enforced in the same manner as other license taxes are collected and payment thereof enforced. (Ord. No. N. S. 301, § 16, 3-7-67) Sec. 17.21. Revocation and suspension of licenses. Any license issued under the provisions of this title is issued and used by all parties receiving or using the same subject to the Supp. No. 12-90 222.1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY _OF HERMOSA--BEACH AMENDING._THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL-CODEWITH RESPECT TO:PENALTIES FOR DELINQUENCIES AND BUSINESS LICENSE .TABES -:- THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 17-20 and 17-20.1 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 7-20. Penalty for Delinquencies. To every license tax mentioned or provided for in this chapter remaining unpaid following its date of expiration, there shall be added a penalty of ten (10) percent of the amount of such tax, and an additional five (5) percent penalty shall be added each thirty (30) days thereafter until paid, not to exceed a maximum of seventy (70) percent per year or one thousand dollars ($1000.00) whichever is less. Said penalty shall be collected and the payment thereof shall be enforced in the same manner as other taxes are collected and the payment. thereof enforced. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 17-20.1. Penalty for commencement of business without license. Any person who carries on any business without first having obtained__a license therefor shall pay a penalty_of ten (10) percent of the prescribed license tax, and an additional five (5) percent penalty shall be added each thirty (30) days thereafter until paid, not to exceed seventy (70) percent per year or one _ thousand dollars ($1,000.00) whichever is less. Said penalty shall be collected and the payment hereof shall be enforced in the same manner as other license taxes are collected and payment thereof enforced" Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in - ull force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its inal passage and adoption. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and doption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the bookof riginal ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the assage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of he city council at which the same is passed and adopted. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 •18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1992 President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa beach, California ATTEST: , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: , City Attorney February 18, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of February 25, 1992 REVIEW OF RECRUITMENT AND TESTING PROCEDURES Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Review the following recruitment and testing procedures and provide input/direction; and 2. Request the Civil Service Board review the Personnel Rules and Regulations, conduct Public Hearings, and make recommendations to the Council regarding: (1) modifications, additions and amendments to the Rules: and (2) appropriate testing methods. Background: At the February 11, 1992 Council meeting, staff was directed to prepare a report describing recruitment and testing procedures for management and non -management positions in the City service. Although the Council's direction also included that recommendations by the City's Civil Service Board be included, there was not time between the last Council meeting and a scheduled Board meeting to prepare for their review and input. Staff is recommending that the Civil Service Board be requested to accept the task of holding Public Hearings toward revising/updating the current Civil Service Rules and Regulations. Analysis: Recruitment/Testing Procedure The attached exhibit "A" displays each of the positions recruited for in the past two years and the testing conducting for each. It should be noted that prior to July 1990 the City contracted with the Los Angeles County Contract Cities Division to conduct testing. In 1990 the County advised the City that they would no longer be providing that service. Since then, the City has rented testing material from Cooperative Personnel Services (CPS). CPS is a local government services unit within the California State Personnel Board and was created to provide personnel and testing services to municipalities. The testing procedure for vacant Civil Service positions (both management and non -management) is as follows: - 1 - 1 1. A request for recruitment is forwarded to the Personnel Department from the requesting department (see attached Administrative Memorandum P-10 marked "Exhibit B"). 2. Recruitment is initiated by preparing and posting a Job Bulletin and advertising the position in either the L.A. Times, Daily Breeze and/or Easy Reader and also placing recruitment notice in appropriate professional publications such as Western Cities and/or Jobs Available (a municipal sector recruitment publication). 3. The testing components (i.e. written, rating from records, oral interview, etc.) and the respective weighting of each component is determined following consultation with the Department Director and a review of prior testing parameters. If a written component is included as part of the testing process, the CPS catalogue is consulted and the appropriate test is ordered. 4. An oral board interview is included as part of all testing. Oral Board members are recruited from other municipalities and are generally persons who are one to two levels above the position being recruited. For lateral entry police positions, an in-house oral board is formed. 5. Following the closing date of the recruitment, all applications received are reviewed for minimum requirements. Those candidates meeting the minimum requirements are notified and scheduled for testing. A rating -from -records, which consists of evaluating the candidates background and experience based upon information contained in the individual's resume, is conducted in selected recruitments to determine those candidates most qualified to be interviewed. Rejected candidates are notified. 6. After completion of testing, the candidates score(s) are tabulated and an eligibility list is developed. That list is forwarded to the Civil Service Board for certification at their next regularly scheduled meeting. 7. Once certified, the applications for the top three candidates are forwarded to the recruiting department for them to schedule interviews and select the successful candidate for the vacant position. 8. Prior to appointment, the selected candidate must successfully pass a physical examination. Exceptions to the above procedure are: 1. Promotional examinations are not advertised other than posting of job bulletins. 2. Reclassifications made pursuant to the City's reclassification procedure (Exhibit "C"), which was approved by the City Council on June 27, 1989, are subject to Council approval. 3. Temporary appointments made pursuant to HBMC Section 2-33. In these cases there is not an eligibility list certified by the Board. 4. Continuous recruitment for Lateral Entry Police Officer; Lateral Entry Public Safety Dispatcher; and Lateral Entry Police Service Officer. Eligibility for these recruitments requires a minimum of one year experience in the respective classification. An in-house oral board, consisting of supervisory personnel, interviews and rates candidates for these classifications. Prior to appointment, candidates must successfully pass a background investigation, medical examination, and psychological assessment. Testing Procedures - Other Municipalities A brief survey was conducted of surrounding cities regarding their testing parameters for management and non -management positions. The Cities of Redondo Beach, Manhattan Beach, Hawthorne, and El Segundo indicated that they each use a variety of testing methodologies including: Rating from Records; Oral Assessment; Written Examinations (including P/F essay type exam); and Assessment Center/Skills Evaluation. The primary methodology used for Management/Department Head positions was either Assessment Center or Oral Interview. Traditional multiple choice type written examinations were not typically included for Mid -Management and Department Head level positions. Determining factors included: test availability; cost considerations (an Assessment Center process which includes written components costs between $2,000 and $4,000); and minimum qualifications for the position (i.e. educational requirements and/or professional certifications). As part of the Civil Service Board's review of the Rules and Regulations, a review of available testing processes can be included with a recommendation made to the Council. Rules and Regulations Many of the provisions of the current Rules and Regulations relating to wages and other terms of employment have been superseded by subsequent Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) negotiated with the various Recognized Employee Organizations and adopted by Resolution of the City Council. When the Rules and Regulations were first developed, the City did not have employee unions separately negotiating for their "wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment" pursuant to Government Code Section 3500 et. seq. The Rules and Regulations have never been amended to reflect provisions which have been changed through negotiations. The recommendation to commence hearings before the Civil Service Board will allow these Rules to be updated to be consistent with current practice. The Civil Service Board has previously had discussion regarding the difficulty in reconciling the Rules with the various provisions of the MOU's. A review was previously scheduled to begin in June or July of this year. Those provisions of the Rules which have been superseded by the MOU's relate to Attendance, Vacation and Leave; Call -In Time (Fire Personnel); Court Time; Overtime; Holidays; Sick Leave; Jury or Witness Pay; Military Leave; and Anniversary Dates. Also superseded by subsequent MOU's are the salary resolutions which are incorporated into the Rules and Regulations by reference. Salary ranges are now established as part of the MOU's, again, which are adopted by Resolution of the City Council. Respectfully sub'tted: L /1-444764-6 Robert A. Blackwood Steve Wisniewski Risk Manager Interim City Manager Attachments: 1. Exhibit "A" - Log of previous recruitments 2. Exhibit "B" - Administrative Memo P-10 3. Exhibit "C" - Reclassification Procedure Classification Assistant Engineer Community Resources Director General Services Director Police Records Administrator Police Service Officer Sweeper Operator Senior Account Clerk Clerk Typist Building Inspector Engineering Technician Property & Evidence Technician Code Enforcement Officer/Asst. Planner Recreation Specialist Public Safety Dispatcher (lateral) Deputy City Clerk Cable TV Coordinator Senior Account Clerk Lateral/Pre-Service Police Officer Public Works Director Equipment Mechanic Clerk Typist EXHIBIT "A" Date of Certification TESTING COMPONENT Rating From Oral Records Written Board Agency 01-17-90 03-21-90 03-21-90 06-20-90 07-18-90 09-19-90 09-19-90 10-18-90 10-24-90 10-24-90 11-19-90 02-20-91 05-29-91 07-24-91 07-24-91 07-24-91 11-25-91 11-25-91 12-18-91 12-18-91 01-15-92 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 40% Q 40% 50% 50% 50% 40% 100% County 100% County 100% County 100% County 60% County 100% City 60% City 50% City 50% City 50% City 60% City 100% City 100% City 100% 40% 60% 100% 40% 60% City City City City 100% City 100% City 40% 60% City 50% 50% Cit Y r ADMINISTRATIVE MEMORANDUM T0: ALL DEPARTMENTS FUNCTION: PERSONNEL FROM: KEVIN B. NORTHCRAFT NO. P-10 CITY MANAGER SUBJECT . PERSONNEL REQUEST FORMS PURPOSE: The purpose of this procedure is to allow for a review of all positions prior to initiating recruitment efforts and to ensure compliance with Article III - Civil Service of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code in all appointments. PROCEDURE: 1. When a vacancy occurs because of a resignation/termination, or when there is a need for temporary/seasonal help, the requesting department shall complete the attached PERSONNEL REQUISITION FORM and forward it to the Personnel Department. 2. Upon receipt of the PERSONNEL REQUISITION FORM, the Personnel Department will verify that the position is allocated in the budget and determine whether there is a current certified eligibility list for the requested classification. 3. The PERSONNEL REQUISITION FORM will be next be forwarded to the City Manager for his approval and/or comments. 4. Following City Manager approval, Personnel will forward the applications of eligible candidates' from a current eligibility list to the Department Director. If there is not a current eligibility list, Personnel will schedule an examination. A. In the case of requests for temporary or seasonal help, Personnel will assist the requesting department in obtaining qualified candidates. Priority should be given to individuals already on an existing eligibility list if a list is available. No recruitment or interviews shall be conducted until the PERSONNEL REQUISITION FORM has received final approval. fle-k44_4(1;64-L, Robert A. Blackwood — Personnel Director .1 Kevin B. North raft City Manager ISSUED: 01-22-90 REVISED: PERSONNEL REQUISITION FORM DEPARTMENT Date DOSITION CLASSIFICATION NUMBER OF POSITIONS AUTHORIZED: (Requested Classification) NUMBER OF POSITIONS CURRENTLY FILLED: (Requested Classification) Check Appropriate boxes Full -Time [ ] Part -Time [ ] Permanent [ ] Seasonal [ ] Requested effective date: TYPE OF POSITION: PROMOTIONAL [ ] REASON FOR VACANCY: Temporary [ ] ENTRY LEVEL [ ] JUSTIFICATION: attach additional sheets if necessary) Department Head Approval Date To be completed by Personnel: Reviewed By: Date Current eligibility list: Yes ( ] No [ ] Certification date: Budget allocation: Yes [ ] No [ ] Comment: City Manager Comment: City Manager Approval Date b CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RECLASSIFICATION PROCEDURE (1) Reclassification studies shall be initiated by the Personnel Department upon the recommendation of the Department Director indicating that the duties required of a current position have become predominantly other than those described in the classification specification sheet. (2) The Personnel Department shall cause an independent audit to be completed of the duties of the position and shall recommend a reclassification upon establishing findings that meet all of the following criteria: (a) that a predominant amount of duties required of the position are other than as described for the current classification; (b) that the incumbent(s) in the position has performed these "out -of -classification" duties for at least a period of six months; (c) that the incumbent(s) in the position(s) is or are the only person(s) performing those specific duties; and that the incumbent has adequately demonstrated that he/she meets the minimum requirements of the proposed classification. (3) The Personnel Department shall submit the findings to the City Manager for certification. (4) Following the City Manager's certification that a reclassification is appropriate, a qualifying examination will be administered to the incumbent(s). The qualifying examination will be structured to test fairly the qualifications as set forth in Article III, section 2-33, of the H.B.M.C. and shall include a written examination. (5) The results of the reclassification will be submitted to the Civil Service Board for certification. The list shall be used only for a "reclassification appointment" to the audited position and the examination shall be limited to the employee(s) named in the reclassification audit. (6) Reclassifications, along with new class specification sheets and/or amendments to the salary resolution or budget, if appropriate, shall be approved by the City Council. Upon approval, the reclassification will take effect the first day of the payroll period in which the Council action was approved. (7) Reclassification shall not be used for the purpose of avoiding established procedures regarding promotions and demotions. contract/reclasaa c Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: R-3 ZONE HEIGHT LIMIT zZ) .moo 174. 01/a Regular Meeting of February 25, 1992 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER AN INTERIM ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT PROJECTS IN THE R-3 ZONE FROM EXCEEDING 30 FEET IN HEIGHT WHILE THE HEIGHT STANDARD IS BEING STUDIED FOR MODIFICATION Planning Commission Recommendation Adopt the attached interim ordinance. Background At their meeting of February 18, 1992, the Planning Commission recommended that the Council adopt an interim ordinance to limit the height in the R-3 zone to 30 feet. State planning and zoning law allows adoption of urgency measures (i.e. and interim ordinance or moratorium) when its determined that to protect the public safety, health, and welfare it is necessary to "prohibit uses which may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal which the legislative body, planning commission, or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time." Adoption of such an interim ordinance requires a four-fifths vote of the legislative body, and it would be in effect for 45 days. Any action to extend of such an ordinance can only be taken after public noticing and a public hearing. Analysis The benefit of such an urgency measure is that it can protect an area during a period when more thorough study of an issue is needed. It is conceivable, for example, that without such an approach that future changes in the law become ineffective if developers are allowed to submit projects under current requirements. The problem with an urgency measure relating to height is that it might place an unnecessary burden on land owners when it is essentially unclear what, if any, zoning changes are being contemplated for a permanent ordinance. Further, the height limits for each residential zoning category have already established a development pattern. If the Council desires to adopt such a measure staff suggests language as contained in the attached—ordinance drafted for Council adoption. It would establish an interim ordinance to 8 prohibit projects located in R-3 zoned properties to exceed 30 feet in height. The Council would also have to consider if a grandfather clause would be included in such an interim ordinance for projects in the plan check stage, or C.U.P. review stage which have not yet obtained a building permit. In the past, these types of ordinances in the City have included a statement to grandfather projects which have already submitted an application for building permit or C.U.P. prior to the adoption of the ordinance and as long as a building permit is pulled within six months. /1%` 1/4//7/ Ken Robertson, Associate Planner CONCUR: G__ -� j�,• , '//'"._i ,.rte-', Michael Schubac .21-s piing Dire 't Steve Wisn`iewski, Interim City Manager p/memo3 r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 92 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES IN R-3 ZONES THAT EXCEED THIRTY (30) FEET IN HEIGHT. WHEREAS, The City Council held a hearing on February 25, 1991, and made the following Findings: A. The height limits in R-3, R-2 and R-1 zones are 35 feet, 30 feet, and 25 feet respectively; B. The differences in these height limits can cause view blockage especially where R-1 or R-2 zones that border R-3 zones; C. The view blockages caused by close proximity between R-1 or R-2 zones and the R-3 zone potentially cause a loss of ocean views which thereby may lower the quality of life and prevent full enjoyment of coastal resources; D. Section 65858 of the Government Code authorizes the adoption of an interim ordinance as an emergency measure which can act to prevent conflicts with the contemplated proposal that the City Council has directed the Planning Commission to study; E. The construction of residences in the R-3 zone in these critical areas adjacent to R-1 and R-2 zones would potentially defeat the purpose of the study; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain the following: Section 1. No building permits shall be issued for any residential construction projects in the R-3 or R -P zone which will increase the height of a residence or construct a new project which exceeds thirty (30) feet in height. (a) Exceptions. This ordinance shall not apply to any projects that have a completed building permit package on file with the City prior to February 25, 1992. Said package must include a plan (plot plan, floor plan, elevation plan and similar plans, and a lot survey), a complete Conditional Use Permit or Precise Development Plan application is included in this exception. Projects that have submitted a completed building permit package must pursue their application in a diligent manner and must have been issued a building - 1 - 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22, 23 24 25 26 27 28 • permit within six months of the effective date of this ordinance.. Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Section 36937, this ordinance is designed to protect the health and safety and welfare of the citizens of Hermosa Beach and becomes effective immediately upon adoption by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council. Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective for a period of forty-five (45) days from todays date unless extended pursuant to the provision of Government Code Section 65858. Section 4. The City Council shall draft a report for presentation to the public at its meeting of March 24, 1992. Such report shall state what steps are being taken by the City to correct the problems referenced in this ordinance and what steps are planned to be taken in the future toremedy the situation. Section 5. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinance of said City, shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THIS DAY OF , 1992. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK 2 Volae(1k8„1,g_i_ CITY ATTORNEY January 21, 1992 Ms. Kathleen Midstokke City Councilman Hermosa Beach, California RE: Moratorium on Construction of R-3 properties in Hermosa Beach Dear Ms. Midstokke: We wanted to make you aware of our feelings regarding this proposed moratorium you will be voting at the next council meeting. We are currently in the final plan check phase in order to obtain a building permit for an addition to our condominium units at 1107 Loma Drive. We have gone before the planning commission and received a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). We have paid over $20,000.00 toward plans, permits, engineering, coastal commission application, and the purchase of construction materials. We need you to consider our plight along with other residents in the same situation of awaiting a building permit. We need to be grandfathered from this moratorium so as not to lose our investment in construction related items, not to mention our time invested in our planning for this to be constructed addition. We'"hope you use good judgement in considering this issue and realize its full impact on the property owners with an R-3 zoning. Those who began the process of development months ago should not be punished for operating under the then current City guidelines. Yours Truly, The Homeowners and Residents of 1107 Loma Drive, Hermosa Beach �/ v. 1 SCC' K04-1114_0," M ah&..✓ 16u.)v-(A_L AAA__ J --h K U (AA,= -77 A,c1(en, �i , I f Anvi�R�'o�� SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPOINTING A CITY MANAGER AND APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 1. is appointed City Manager, effective , with compensation and benefits as specified in the agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference made a part hereof. 2. The Mayor and City Attorney are hereby authorized and directed to execute the agreement attached as Exhibit "A" on behalf of the City. 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED AND APPROVED on this 25th day of February, 1992. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, Calif. ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to Form: City Attorney I, Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach, California, certify that this resolution was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the City Council held February 25, 1992, and was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: - 1 - City Clerk IQa P-/-") AD/ad eors:.4,/. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT �o MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FROM: The Planning Commission SUBJECT: Sign Ordinance DATE: February 4, 1992 The sign ordinance is currently contained in the City's Municipal Code as a separate chapter. Typically, sign ordinances are part of zoning ordinances which is more appropriate in terms of where the authority lies for enforcement, interpretation and amendment. The Planning Commission discussed this issue at the meeting of 2/4/92 and agreed that the sign ordinance should be moved to the zoning ordinance. Further, the Commission feels that the sign ordinance needs to be reviewed carefully for possible clarification and substantive changes, and compared with other sign ordinances. The Commission, therefore, requests that the City Council initiate a text amendment to the Municipal Code to make the sign ordinance a part of the zoning ordinance. Christine Ketz, Chairperson JOb HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT JANUARY 1992 STAFF REPORTS PREPARED February 18, 1992 Regular Meeting of February 25 , 1992 MEETINGS / SEMINARS MEETINGS 25 [ 33 I 202 I 203 CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES INITIAL INSPECTIONS THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE APPEAL I CITY COUNCIL RECONSIDERATION 4 6 7 13 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CONDO) 0 2 6 13 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (COMMERCIAL) 0 12 12 28 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 0 0 6 10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION 0 2 2 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/ MAP EXTENSION 2 0 6 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 0 0 0 FINAL MAP 0 1 9 15 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 1 24 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 0 0 1 NONCONFORMING REMODEL 1 0 7 1 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2 0 5 2 PARKING PLAN 0 1 2 4 SPECIAL STUDY 2 0 5 0 SUBDIVISION 0 0 2 4 TEXT AMENDMENT 3 0 5 10 TRANSIT 1 1 5 3 VARIANCE 0 0 •2 2 ZONE CHANGE 0 0 1 18 MISCELLANEOUS 3 3 39 14 MEETINGS / SEMINARS MEETINGS 25 [ 33 I 202 I 203 CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES INITIAL INSPECTIONS 11 4 79 112 FOLLOW UP INSPECTIONS 15 10 78 89 LETTERS GENERATED 9 7 132 232 MEMOS GENERATED 2 1 21 46 C.U.P. ACCEPTANCE FORMS RECEIVED 0 4 16 23 C.U.P. COVENANT FORMS GENERATED 2 0 34 0 C.U.P. COVENANT FORMS RECEIVED 2 0 30 0 CITATIONS ISSUED 1 0 1 1 C.U.P. VIOLATIONS ABATED 9 3 82 17 WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP MUNICIPAL AREA EXPRESS (MAX) RIDERSHIP BEACH ROUTE 1 1355 1377 I 9909 I 9076 BUDGET (FOR 58% OF FY) EXPENDITURE (COMPARE TO BUDGET ESTIMATE) THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE HERMOSA BEACH PASSENGERS 1285 _ 753 12887 5675 REDONDOBEACHPASSENGERS 4148 3737 34686 27059 SATELLITE PASSENGERS 395 310 3118 2252 MUNICIPAL AREA EXPRESS (MAX) RIDERSHIP BEACH ROUTE 1 1355 1377 I 9909 I 9076 BUDGET (FOR 58% OF FY) EXPENDITURE (COMPARE TO BUDGET ESTIMATE) 8%- 34 %- 3EVENUE (COMPARE TO BUDGET ESTIMATE) 49% + 2.5 %- The Following Activities Were Undertaken for Transit Projects 1. Routine tasks. Upcoming Agenda Items to City Council 1. Appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of a Conditional Use Permit, Tentative Parcel Map #20554 and a Precise Development Plan for a 2 -unit condominium at 2902 Hermosa Avenue. 2. First quarter General Plan amendment: to amend the Circulation Element to re-route the coastal bicycle route from 24th Street to the north City boundary. Long Term Projects Underway 1. Recovering permit authority from Coastal Commission. 2. Updating zoning ordinance for compliance with current law, clarification of intent, and procedural correctness. 3. Starting work on Conditional Use Permit for oil drilling project. 4. Updating Land Use Element and other General Plan Elements. Respectfully submitted, CONCUR ? -f Yu-Ying Ting Administrative Aide Michael Schubach Planning Director Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager pc/activity February 18, Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council the Hermosa Beach City Council February 25, FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, JANUARY 1992 1992 Meeting of 1992 - The escrow on South School closed as planned on January 10, 1992. The final price was $2,341,613.85. - Population forms for the annual population estimate were submitted to the State. - Finance and Treasurer department personnel attended demos of Eden Systems Inc. financial software. This was the second demo of the software at the City. - Departments began reviewing and revising their budgets for Midyear Budget Review. STATISTICAL SECTION MONTHNT ITLASTMFYTH I DATED I TOST FY DATE CITATION PAYMENTS 2,377 4,350 25,360 INVOICES 10 17 69 CASH RECEIPTS 1,265 1,381 10,731 WARRANTS 314 370 2,357 PURCHASE ORDERS 260 443 2,529 UUT EXEMPTIONS 688 662 FILED TO DATE PAYROLL FULL TIME 163 162 PART TIME 61 60 DISCOUNTS TAKEN $ 175.44 $ 1,379.77 Noted: Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager 32,569 107 11,654 2,034 2,554 Viki Co eland Finance Director HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1991 Jan 31. 1992 FIRE STATISTICS This Month This Month Year to Date Last Year One Year Ago To Date Total Calls 41i 62 41 62 (types) False Alarms 4 4 4 4 Mutual Aid 2 1 2 1 Paramedic assists 35 35 35 35 Residence Fire 10 6 10 6 Commercial Fire 1 3 1 3 Vehicle Fire 0 1 0 1 Hazardous Mtls. 2 6 2 6 _ Other 13 18 13 18 PARAMEDIC STATISTICS Total Responses l 75 71[ 75 71 (types) No Patient/aid 1 i 10 1 10 Medical 35 32 35 32 Trauma 39 29 39 29 Auto Accident. 14 8 14 8 Assault 9 5 9 5 Jail Call 5 5 5 5 Transports 47 24, 47 24 Base Hosp.Con. 261 27 26 27 Trauma Center 1 0+ 1 0 STRAND AND BEACH CALLS Medical only 2 2 2� 2 Ocean Accident 0 0 01 0 Beach Accident 0 0 0 0 Bike v Bike 0 0_ 0 0 Bike v Ped 1 1 1 1 Fall off Bike 0 0 0 0 Skater v Skater 0 0 0 0. Skater v Ped 0 0 0 0 Fall off Skates 0 0 0 0 Bike/Skater v Other 0 0 0 0 Assault 0 0 0 0 INSPECTIONS and PREVENTION T (primary) Commercial 511 18 51 18 Assembly 0 0 0 0 Institutions 0 0 0 0 Industrial 0 0 0 0 Apartments 6 9 6 9 (re—inspections) Commercial 28 34 28 34 Assembly 0 0 0 0 Institutions 0 0 0 01 Industrial 1 0 1 0 Apartments 32 24 32 24 Fumigations 10 101 10 10 Respectfully Submi to : 1 N. Steve S. Wisniewski, Interim City Manager February 18, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City Council Meeting of _February 25, 1992 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES JANUARY, 1992 ACTIVITY REPORT The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of January. RECREATION PROGRAMMING January 1 - A bus of 39 passengers paraded its way to the 1992 annual Tournament of Roses Parade. Participants enjoyed a continental breakfast and an impressive view of the parade. Since the trip was such a success, more busses will be reserved for 1993. January 21 - The Spring Recreation brochure was mailed to residents. Signups for classes and activities will begin Monday, February 10th. New programs for adults and children include: Spring sports camp, roller hockey classes and free safety clinic, free hip hop dance workshop, excursions for all ages, indoor coed volleyball league. Some brand new classes include: semi -private tennis lessons, tennis for tots, romp and roll tumbling, bench aerobics, beachercize (sunrise exercise on the beach). SPECIAL EVENTS Hermosa Beach enabled its neighbor Redondo Beach to hold a special one mile exhibition sprint run at the beginning of their annual Superbowl Sunday 10K run. Twelve elite athletics sprinted from 8th Street on Hermosa Avenue and finished at the starting line for the 10K. Hermosa Beach Police Department provided assistance in the coordination. COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION The Foundation held its monthly meeting on January 13th. A motion was accepted that Anne Hulegard be designated as the artistic director for 12 performances of The Heidi Chronicles in the Hermosa Civic Theatre beginning June 12th. Volunteers will staff the production. FILM PERMITS Two film permits were processed including one student film. Processing and locations fees collected totaled $1,046. MISCELLANEOUS Staff attended the Sand and Strand meeting to confirm race sponsors. The 40th annual race will be held February 9th. Staff attended the monthly the Hermosa Beach Coordinating Council meeting on January 30th. Facility 1/92 User Hours 1/91 User Hours Field 92 130 - Theatre 46 40 Clark 147 170 Gym 221 335 Room 7 13 26 Room 8 128 91 Room 10 41 71 Room 12 65 101 DEPARTMENT REVENUE Current This month FY Last FY Month Last FY To Date To Date $23,647.86 $21,602.60 Revenue Projection: $321,000 $186,807.36 $151,003.28 Community Resources Department general fund revenue for 58% of the fiscal year is $186,807 or 58% of the projected figure. Community Resources Department general fund expenditure for 58% of the fiscal year is $226,687 or 58% of the budget FY 1991-92. Noted :- Mary C. Ro Dept. of neyy;Director omm nity Resources Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Respectfully submitted, ciz_61 /6_3,/ Carol Bel ser , Recreation Specialist Dept. of Community Resources Honorable Mayor and February 19, 1992 Members of the City Council ACTIVITY REPORT DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY JANUARY, 1992 Attached for your information are recap sheets of department activity for the month of January. Overall permit activity decreased in January as the department issued 58 permits of which 26 were building permits. ---Two permits were issued -for__sin- gle family dwellings and sixteen permits were issued for alterations or additions to existing dwellings. Six permits were issued for alterations to commercial buildings. One dwelling unit was demolished resulting in a net increase of one dwelling unit to the housing inventory. The department also processed forty-four plans for zoning review, plan check or revisions. Plan processing "turn around" averaged under one week during January. The department conducted 157 inspections during January not including complaint investigations. Building Department general fund revenue for 58.3% of the fiscal year is $187,035.92 or 50.6% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. Total revenue for all funds is $289,987.50. The Business License division reports that 356 licenses were issued during January resulting in revenue of $38,545.93. Business License revenue to date represents 64.3% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. -- The department logged 16 new code enforcement complaints during January, of which one was for illegal dwelling units. The department currently_has twenty-six illegal dwelling unit cases under investigation. The January report on recycling participation levels and refuse diversion is attached to this report. The report indicates that the participation level (at least one recyclable item set out) averaged 71.1% in January. The total volume of recyclable materials collected in January totaled 194 tons and represents a diversion of 24.2% of the residential refuse that would otherwise likely end up in a landfill. In addition, 30.81 tons of Christmas trees were collected in that program. Respectfully Submitted, ,e4„, William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety Noted: Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT Month of JANUARY 1992 NUMBER OF THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY PERMITS CURRENT MONTH LAST FY DATE TO DATE Building 26 26 192 187 Plumbing 21 34 171 175 Electric 11 20 117 121 Plan Check 17 16 131 126 Sewer Use 1 1 9 8 Res. Bldg. Reports 15 13 108 116 Comm. Inspections 14 22 133 180 Parks & Recreation 2 1 5 1 In lieu Park & Rec. 0 2 7 14 Board of Appeals 0 0 0 0 Sign Review 1 8 30 35 Fire Flow Fees 2 7 36 43 Legal Determination 0 0 1 0 Zoning Appeals 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 110 150 940 1,006 FEES Building** 7,706.64 12,968.30 93,141.66 157,782.63 Plumbing 926.70 2,703.00 12,570.60 13,126.45 Electric 1,849.55 2,283.00 12,816.30 14,724.00 Plan Check 8,185.24 5,792.58 55,132.10 109,864.39 Sewer Use 558.92 901.48 6,593.19 5,165.44 Res. Bldg. Reports 582.75 520.00 4,409.50 4,520.00 Comm. Inspections 564.76 865.00 5,448.51 4,740.00 Parks & Recreation 7,000.00 3,500.00 17,500.00 3,500.00 In lieu Park & Rec. 0 8,580.00 46,650.00 85,800.00 Board of Appeals 0 0 0 0 Sign Review 83.75 640.00 2,471.25 1,290.00 Fire Flow Fees 1,144.14 7,381.00 32,208.39 133,516.24 Legal Determination 0 0 1,046.00 0 Zoning Appeals 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 28,602.45 46,134.36 289,987.50 534,029.15 VALUATIONS 848,782 1,280,589 7,274,325 18,860,584 **Includes State Seismic Fee $88.21 Revenue: BUSINESS LICENSE MONTHLY REPORT 38,545.93 37,065.67 Licenses issued: 356 305 290;979.87 252,729.89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED Month of JANUARY 1992 TYPE OF STRUCTURE DWELLING UNITS PERMITS PROVIDED VALUATION 1. Single Dwellings 2 2 560,000 2. Duplex Dwellings 3. Triplex Dwellings 4. Four Units or More 5. Condominiums 6. Commercial Buildings 7. Industrial Buildings 8. Publicly Owned Buildings 9. Garages - Residential 10. Accessory Buildings 11. Fences and Walls 1 8,200 12. Swimming Pools 13. Alterations, additions or repairs to dwellings 16 250,189 14. Alterations, additions or repairs to Commercial Bldgs. 6 30,393 15. Alterations, additions or repairs to indus. bldgs. 16. Alterations, additions or repairs to publicly owned bldgs. 17. Alterations, additions, repairs to garages or accessory bldgs. 18. Signs 19. Dwelling units moved 20. Dwelling units demolished 1 -1 21. All other permits not listed TOTAL PERMITS: 26 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: 848,782 ** TOTAL DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED : 2 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DEMOLISHED: 1 NET CHANGE: +1 NET DWELLING UNIT CHANGE FY 91/92 +8 CUMULATIVE DWELLING UNIT TOTAL: 9691 (INCLUDES PERMITS ISSUED) ** Revised figure based on land use study by the Planning Dept. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RECYCLENOW REPORT JANUARY 1992 TRASH YDWST TOTAL ONP COMM DATE RATE ACTUAL MAX % DIV. TONS TONS MIXED GLASS TIN ALUM PET HDPE MIXED WST/TONS 1/2 76.7% 1.148 1.497 20.6% 40.58 10.6 14.470 5.139 538 272 146 312 233 1/3 75.0% 1,172 1.562 19.5% 38.98 9.5 12,260 5.441 460 206 94 273 186 1/6 65.2% 1.189 1,823 23.7% 40.19 12.5 17.460 5.745 689 292 210 307 247 1/7 71.2% 1.158 1,627 25.4% 38.63 13.2 18.970 5,945 631 228 139 206 191 1/8 77.0% 1,152 1,497 25.2% 37.85 12.8 18.540 5.300 673 259 168 386 224 1/9 76.1% 1,188 1,562 20.9% 39.41 10.4 15.000 4.557 489 204 192 198 130 1/13 63.7% 1,162 1,823 26.5% 31.54 11.3 16.580 4.454 568 141 238 367 342 1/14 69.0% 1,122 1,627 28.2% 30.3 11.9 17,280 5.291 477 183 124 308 157 1/15 74.0% 1,108 1,497 24.7% 30.61 10.1 1:3.390 4.716 536 255 163 336 224 1/16 75.2% 1.174 1.562 23.1% 31.23 9.4 12.890 4.714 501 180 111 163 151 1/20 66.3% 1,209 1.823 27.7% 29.93 11.5 16,230 5,490 464 208 94 276 188 1/21 72.6% 1,181 1,627 25.9% 27.63 9.7 14,470 3,735 448 190 136 200 161 1/22 73.7% 1,103 1,497 25.4% 29.35 10.0 14,290 4.404 461 233 125 268 199 1/23 71.8% 1,121 1,562 26.4% 28.2 10.1 15,200 3.923 421 175 165 170 156 1/27 63.1% 1,151 1,823 24.1% 34.43 11.0 15.990 4.483 569 219 142 326 191 1/28 70.5% 1,147 1,627 22.4% 33.42 9.6 13,450 4.221 538 133 226 347 324 1/29 73.3% 1.098 1.497 24.5% 32.95 10.7 15.770 4.254 483 230 146 303 204 1/30 71.0% 1.109 1.562 22.9% 33.82 10.0 14.190 4,749 429 164 112 276 140 TOT 71.1% 20,692 29.095 24.2% 609.1 194.0 276.930 86,561 9.375 3,772 2.731 5,022 3.698 579.8 BREAKDOWN OF 803.1 TONS OF RESIDENTIAL REFUSE: BREAKDOWN OF 1382.9 TONS OF TOTAL CITY REFUSE: BREAKDOWN OF BREAKDOWN OF BREAKDOWN OF 75.8% 44.0% 194.0 TONS OF RECYCLABLES: 803.1 TONS OF RESIDENTIAL REFUSE: 1382.9 TONS OF CITY REFUSE: AVERAGE WEEKLY VOLUME OF CITY REFUSE: AVERAGE WEEKLY VOLUME OF COMMERCIAL REFUSE: AVERAGE WEEKLY VOLUME OF RESIDENTIAL REFUSE: AVERAGE WEEKLY VOLUME OF RECYCLABLE MATERIAL: TOTAL ONP TONS MIXED GLASS 100% 71.4% 22.33 24.2% 17.2% 5.43 14.0% 10.0% 3.1% 307.3 128.8 135.3 43.1 COMM TIN ALUM. PET HDPE MIXED WASTE/TONS --- ---- --- ---- 2.4% 1.0% 0.7% 1.3% 1.0% 0.6% 0.23 0.23 0.33 0.23 0.33 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 41.9% CITT OF H8RM0SA BRACH RICYCL6N0N ttrrsttt mtittlsttt smosst SUMMARY RIFORT R65ID0NTIAL PARTICIPATION 881GHT O8 RBCYCLABL! MATHRIALS TRASH CCMI1 CI71NID8 MIST TOTAL 080 WASH % MONTH RAT! ACTUAL MAX. % DIV. TONS TONS 81038 GLASS TIN ALUM. PET HDPE 61008 TNS DIVERSION JUNI 70.4% 18,330 26,036 23.1% 527.1 158.0 235,610 63,489 6,202 2,565 1,375 2,804 2,018 593.3 12.4% JULY 70.7% 21,898 30,983 23.2% 634.3 191.4 298,160 65,059 7,418 3,092 2,153 3,949 2,941 802.2 11.80 AUGUST 70.8% 19,527 27,598 22.7% 554.3 162.9 239,977 66,337 7,466 3,110 2,172 3,849 2,862 746.3 11.1% SEPTEMBER 70.61 19,680 27,859 25.1% 539.6 180.8 273,050 69,390 7,343 3,182 2,000 3,840 2,745 617.1 13.5% OCTOBER 69.9% 21,478 30,722 25.5% 593.7 203.5 316,416 69.789 1,922 3,294 2,284 4,128 3,083 586.2 14.7% NOVEMBER 67.9% 17,685 26,036 22.6% 482.2 140.8 212,186 53,734 5,992 2,522 1,719 3,083 2,280 540.7 12.1% 080E89E0 69.3% 20,436 29,486 26.1% 600.8 211.7 317,610 82,386 8,926 3,588 2,646 4,771 3,546 560.8 15.4% JANUARY 71.1% 20,692 29,095 24.22 609.1 194.0 276,930 86,561 9,375 3,772 2,731 5,022 3,698 579.8 14.0% FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY TTD AVG. 70.1% 19,966 28,477 24.1% 568 180 271,245 69,593 7,581 3,141 2,135 3,931 2,897 628 13.1% 08D1MPT10! DOLLARS 00081783 YTD JUN JUL AUG SIP OCT NOV 00C JAN FHB MAR APR MAT TOTAL ONP/01182: TONS 117.8 149.1 120.0 136.5 158.2 106.1 158.8 138.5 1205.0 $ 088 TON $15 315 315 $15 315 315 315 315 N.A. TOTAL $1,767.15 32,236.35 $1,799.85 32,047.95 32,373.15 $1,591.35 32,382.00 32,077.50 316,275.30 CCMMINGL80: TONS 40.2 42.3 42.9 42.2 45.3 34.7 52.9 55.6 356.14 3 PIE 703 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 N.A. TOTAL 31,608.80 31,692.40 31,716.00 31,688.00 $1,812.00 $1,388.40 32,116.00 $2,224.00 314,245.60 TOTAL 33,375.95 33,928.75 $3,515.85 83,735.95 34,185.15 32,979.75 34,498.00 $4,301.50 $30,520.90 HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1992 January OFFENSES REPORTED This Month This Month Year to Date Last Year One Year Ago To Date Murder 0 0 0 0 Rape 1 0 1 0 Robbery 3 4 3 4 Assault 4 5 4 5 Burglary 17 32 17 32 Larceny 53 54 53 54 Motor Vehicle Theft 11 14 11 14 DUI 43 29 43 29 All Other Offenses 329 238 329 238 Disturbance Calls 184 244 184 244 PERSONS ARRESTED Adults 73 83 73 83 Juveniles 4 4 11 11 Criminal Citations 103 58 103 58 Bicycle/Skateboard Cites 0 1 0 1 TRAFFIC REPORT ACCIDENTS Fatal 0 0 0 0 Injury 16 12 16 12 Property Damage Only 37 29 37 29 CITATIONS Traffic 331 437 331 437 Parking 9 191 9 19 CALLS FOR SERVICE Total Calls 2259 2264 2259 2264 Noted: I Respectfully Submitted, �� di,eik+,0 '/ Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager Val Straser Acting Chief of Police February 13, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council February 25, 1992 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT JANUARY ACTIVITY REPORT Conducted testing for Clerk typist. Eligibility list was certified at the January 15, 1992 Civil Service meeting. Attended the Ninth Annual Labor Relations Conference. Coordinated interview sessions for City Manager candidates. Current This Month FY to Last FY to STATISTICAL SECTION: Month Last Year Date to Date Worker Comp Claims: Claims Opened 5 5 32 22 Claims Closed 1 5 33 40 Total Open 79 69 79 69 Lost Time (Manhours) Safety 312 * 2,420 * Non -safety 181 * 2.737 * Liability Claims: Claims opened 3 3 36 18 Claims closed 3 1 38 17 Total open 40 32 40 32 Employee Involved Vehicle Accidents: Safety 0 * 4 Non -safety 0 * 4 Employee Turnover: Safety Non -safety 0 0 * 1 * 7 * * * * * Information not maintained in this format last fiscal year. General Appropriations Secretary: The following summary indicates the amount of the assigned functions: January: 170 hours available Word Processing Mail Processing 74% (126 hrs) 8% (14 hrs) Avg. 7.75 hrs/day Avg. .75 hr/day Word Processing Services by Department: Finance City Manager: City Clerk . Planning 21% (26 hrs) 8% (10 hrs) 11% (14 hrs) 2% ( 2 hrs ) Respectfully Submitted, Robert A. Blackwood, Director Personnel and Risk Management pers/act of time spent on each Directory/Dept Support 18% (30 hrs) Avg. 1.50 hrs/day Public Works Personnel • Community Resources: 34% 22% 2% 0 (43 (28 ( 3 Steve S. Wisniewski Interim City Manager hrs) hrs) hrs) February 20, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 25, 1992 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - JANUARY 1992 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration function coordinates and blends the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager; includes engineering and management of capital improvement projects. Permits Issued: Type Current Month Last FY To Date This Month FY Last FY To Date Sewer Demolition Sewer Lateral Street Excavation Utility Co's only Dumpster/Strand Banner Permits O 4 O 0 7 4 1 0 5 0 1 0 ENGINEERING 6 23 3 8 36 44 108 81 23 4 10 8 The Capital Improvement Projects which are currently in progress are: CIP 85-137 FAU, Asphaltic Over- CIP 86-176 lay, Valley, Ardmore CIP 89-406 & Prospect CIP 89-511 CIP 89-144 Strand Walk & Walkway CIP 89-513 CIP 89-150 Misc. Traf. Sig. Imp. CIP 90-151 Traf. Eng. Program CIP 89-515 CIP 91-165 Misc. Bikeway Const. CIP 89-604 MAINTENANCE The maintenance function of the Public Works following sections: - Parks/Medians - Street Maintenance/Sanitation - Sewers/Storm Drains - Street Lighting Traf. Control Pre-emp. Sewer Rehab/Area 4 R -R -O -W Parking Lot Purchase of 5 Lots at Edith Rodaway Friendship Park Purchase of South School Various Build. Imp. Department is divided into - Traffic Safety - Building Maintenance - Equipment Service the A ri Parks Division/Medians: Irrigation repairs city-wide. Installed new sprinkler system around new basketball courts at Clark Stadium and also seeded the area with grass seed. Filled low areas in the Clark Stadium outfield with dirt for re -seeding. Street Maintenance/Sanitation: Street and sidewalk repairs, City-wide. Continued patching cracks in Strand walkway and Monterey Boulevard. Closed all openings into old South School with chain link fence. Installed post and chain link fence to close off the east entrance of old South School. Removed graffiti city-wide. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Rodded sewer mains city-wide. Opened storm drain outlets on Beach and cleaned storm drain inlets City-wide. Street Lighting: Installed underground conduit for traffic signal to be installed Valley Drive at Valley School. Installed lighting system at 6th Street & Prospect Avenue School. Built racks for Christmas Decorations at 6th Street & Prospect Avenue School. Boarded up windows at old South School. Installed electrical system for the batting cage at Clark Field. Helped Traffic Division install new left turn pocket on Aviation. Traffic Safety Division: Worked with Street Lighting Division installing lighting system and building Christmas decoration racks at 6th Street and Prospect Avenue School. Painted STOP, STOP bars and crosswalks City-wide. Installed new left-hand turn pocket on Aviation just east of Pacific Coast Highway. Building Maintenance Division: Painted power shack at Clark Field. Installed new door and dry wall at the Police Department garage on Bard Street. Repaired the north and south wing doors at the Community Center. Installed new windows in office at Base Three. Equipment Service: On-going maintenance of City vehicles and equipment. Graffiti Removal: JULY 1990 AUGUST 1990 SEPTEMBER 1990 OCTOBER 1990 NOVEMBER 1990 DECEMBER 1990 JANUARY 1991 FEBRUARY 1991 MARCH 1991 APRIL 1991 MAY 1991 JUNE 1991 YTD TOTAL Res -c fully su '/ Glickman' 39.75 48.00 30.00 81.50 79.00 41.00 33.75 29.50 35.00 70.75 40.50 21.50 Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. 550.25 Hrs. itted, JULY 1991 AUGUST 1991 SEPTEMBER 1991 OCTOBER 1991 NOVEMBER 1991 DECEMBER 1991 JANUARY 1992 erim Director of Public Works mon2/pwadmin YTD TOTAL 59.50 27.00 43.50 37.50 24.00 27.00 19.50 Hrs. Hrs. (Revised) Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. 238.00 Hrs. Steve Wisniewski Acting City Manager Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT JANUARY 1992 ACTIVITY REPORT Parking Cites Issued Vehicles Impounded/Booted Calls Responded To Booting Revenue Dismissals processed Citations Issued Warnings Issued Complaints Responded To Total Number of Animals Picked -Up of which: Returned to Owner Taken to Shelter Injured, taken to Vet Deceased CONCUR: envy L. Staten, Acting General Sgrvices Director Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager PARKING ENFORCEMENT Current Month 4,168 24 103 $7,467 369 42 0 53 35 17 18 (0) (5) This Month Last Year 5,119 15 124 $3,066 N/A ANIMAL CONTROL 36 0 31 56 11 14 3 28 February 10, 1992 City Council Meeting of February 25, 1992 Fiscal Year To Date 37,452 204 779 $51,252 3,584 258 0 547 337 128 195 (9) (88) Last Fiscal Year To Date 41,283 303 885 $25,484 N/A Respectfully submitted to, Henry L. Staten, Acting General Services Director by 258 0 391 389 124 118 32 132 Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide COMMENTS: Positive enforcement of the Public Information Program, has reduced the number of citations issued. One IOD vacancy, and two vacant full-time positions to be filled, contributed to the reduced cite count. Dismissed cita- tions reflect those citations dismissed during the month, not Jan. exclusively. SCALE: 1" =30' PARCEL MNP NO. 20620 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH , COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 4 , BLOCK 49 , FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH , AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGES 59 AND 60 OF MAPS , IN ,THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES SUBD/VIDER'S STATEMENT.: I HEREBY STATE THAT l AM THE SUBDIVIDER OF THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON 77-1I5 MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND l CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION. TERRY L. 1WETKOWSKI , (SUBDIVIDER) • STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LqS ANGELS 3 SS. ON THIS /5 DAY OF/k�y JA< 1991, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED TERRY L. WETKOWSKI, PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME. KAREN M. OWENS NOTARY PUBLIC—CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 15, 1995. 1/4. KAREN M. OWENS NOTARY PUBLIC CITY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO WHICH THE- LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. DATE: BY: CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. CONDOMINIUM NOTE: THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR 3 UNITS, WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN, PROVIDE THE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. EASEMENT NOTE: WARREN GILLELEN, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPES AS DISCLOSED BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1617, PAGE 47 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. SAID EASEMENT IS INDETERMINATE IN NATURE. 14m 16 nil STREET N77050 '00"E 14.1 FD. L&TPER ]L C. E.F.B. 42. LLI Q c.4J 30' STREET MANHATTAN 30' 6 N12°10'00"W 6 30' 0' 0' 30' FD. 4 NAIL STRADS. PER C.E.F. B. 63. S'LY LINE OF LOT 5 , BLOCK 49 , FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH , M.B. 1-59-60. N77050'00"E ■ ■ • 1 A = 4000 SQ. FT • • • • • 100.00' • • • N77°50'00"E N'LY LINE OF LOT 3 , BLOCK 49 , FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH , M.B. 1-59-60. 100.00' PIER 10' 2 N12°10'00'W 10' 0' wicC CD 210' 10' 10' —— ' AVENUE SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET FEB 1 21992 ENGINEER'S STATEMENT:: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF TERRY L. WETKOWSKI IN SEPTEMBER, 1991. l HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY AZ'4i. �l �` t. JAMES C. ORL4ND, R.C.E. NO. 22024 EXPIRES: 9-30-93 RECORD DATA NOTE: RECORD DATA IS FROM FIRST ADDITION''TO HERMOSA BEACH, M.B. 1-59-60. RECORD OWNER IS: TERRY L. WETKOWSKI CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE:: THIS MAP CONFORMS WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF LOCAL ORDINANCE. DATE: ;� X92 -r BY: DEPUTY R. C. E. NO i 7657-- EXPIRES 6°� EXPIRES e; 3c< SECRETARY OF PLANNING CERTIFICATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO -THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY -THE --- PLANNING COMMISION ON THE DAY OF 19 DATE: BY: CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE:: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION THE DAY OF THE ANNEXED MAP. SECRETARY OF PLANNING OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON 19____, APPROVED • DATE: BY: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. COUNTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE:: THIS MAP CONFORMS WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT. COUNTY ENGINEER DATE: BY: DEPUTY R.C.E. NO EXPIRES LEGEND • • • a INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP. SCALE: 1" =30' PARCEL MAP NO. 22892 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH , COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 11 J.M. FLOORES SUBDIVISION, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 9, PAGE 127 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT.: I HEREBY STATE THAT l AM THE SUBDIVIDER OF THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND l CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION. GREGORY STRANGE, (SUBDNDER) STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF .L,/OS ANGELES ON THIS o2/ai DAY OF bre" , 1991, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED GREGORY STRANGE , PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS . SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME. ss. . KAREN M. OWENS NOTARY PUBLIC -CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 15, 1995. Lida,u,,, hi Aut.,/ * KAREN M. OWENS NOTARY PUBLIC CITY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE.: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISD/C770N OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. DATE: BY: CITY -TREASURER. OF THECITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. CONDOMINIUM NOTE: THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR 2 UNITS, WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN, PROVIDE THE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. EASEMENT NOTE: WARREN GILLELEN, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPES AS DISCLOSED BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1617, PAGE 47 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. SAID EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE. LEGEND • • • • • • • • • • INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP. n 771 STREET N N76° .34100.E v , 1 FD. P.K. AND BRASS PER C.EF.B. 45. N76° 34100.E 42.40' 40' E'LY UNE OF LOT 13,*. w H 40' * INDICATES J.M. FLOORES SUBDIVISION, M.B. 9-127. N76° 54'00-E 80.96' 40' 162± STREET FD." P.K. NAIL PER C.EF.B. 132. PURPOSES SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET FEB 121992 ENGINEER'S STATEMENT.: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA /N CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF *GREGORY STRANGE IN SEPTEMBER, 1991. l HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. v^tiOFFZiOr k /� �,/T,hi jam- . No:'2024 Ez2Sm301993 AMES C. ORL4ND, R.C.E. NO. 22024 EXPIRES: 9-30-93 RECORD DATA NOTE: RECORD DATA IS FROM J.M. FLOORES SUBDIVISION, M.B. 9-127. RECORD OWNER IS: GREGORY STRANGE 1H-154agla`(GeraTI F`(THAT 1 HAVXAM1 r JE ' -FRIG MAPMIPTPAT CVcaJFzazMS 54e5TAIJTIALLY TOTNE 1rAT1 VE MAP AM At2.- Ac7Ma ALl t-1AAT10#S THEcatyp; THAT AI,1. 'PRO'li SI oA J S OF gUgt7r V I S l cIV CP 11.4 An1GE5oF TI+te GI7Y©F !*-Moa A Ata5LlcAgt.,e. ATTI-tE TIME OP AP7124ovAL,GF THE T-1.1TAT1 VE MAP WANE Real 4°t-M-sapWITH' AND THAT 1 AM YT-ifPtEDTHATTIs KAP isrEe-{hli!dku_y ear -re -err WIT1-1- !?--1 PCT TO c(7'( R-Eoizos. 17QTE : ,? fl- 1,11r ;'_ .:.,.. cy,,72 s-„,,.,... Reg; No . �095C, Exp7,2E5 Clip/ya I HEREBY CERTIFY -THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS • SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISION ON THE DAY OF 19___ DATE: BY: CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE:: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT, THE HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION THE DAY OF THE ANNEXED MAP. SECRETARY OF PLANNING OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. CITY COU.AICIL OF THE CITY OF ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON , 19____, APPROVED DATE: BY: I,[RFPY CF,:TIP TIIr.T .I!'.r IT r'.:''r't, s '.;'.. Nr'T CLF:1IF!LD +, S CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. r TWs £4Ar IF Sir G t;. ''r GE THE P FSV C7 DATE ._ ET ______ __ !_mar rne q{F;ttT Pcc NO ex P/MES