The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01/28/92MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, January 28, 1992, at the hour of 7:'4 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - The closed session was held at 7: P.M. regard- ing matters of litigation: Juran vs City of Hermosa Beach; pur- suant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a). The closed session was recessed at 7: P.M. to the regular scheduled public meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Jordan Kushins, Hermosa Valley School, Student of the Month ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Mayor Midstokke Absent: Wiemans (!--iNNOUNCEMENTS ) ,.?///,/ Lo//:/ ,�`-•' ) 19T �i /-' / 1_.. J - re/e)iJ�/1 `iii ERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL STUDENT OF THE MONTH - Jordan Kushins Mayor Midstokke congratulated Jordan Kushins for being recognized as the Hermosa Valley School, "Student of the Month", for the month of January, 1992, and wished her success in her future endeavors. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, c, �' �--z > Ali e.-( 7,-, June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., Jerry Compton - 832 Seventh Street, Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 1 2. 642) • 1. 0 Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street,,, " (2, ) 4� C--, Jim Lissne - 2715 El Oeste Drive, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, p.�,k Gf ,� / \ �`--A9 t /o 30 CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (1), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3 but are listed in order for clarity: (a) (b) (c) , (d) , (e) , (f) , (g) , (h) , (i) , (j) , (k) , and (1) Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. /"Coming forward to address the consent calendar were: the Council on items not removed from No one came forward to address the Council on items not from the consent calendar. (a) aV 5 /1 _2(e) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on 14, 1992; 2) Special meeting of the City Council held on January 18, 1992. removed January This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting due to his objection to having a closed session to interview City Manager applicants. Councilmember Benz declared that any future interviews should not be held in closed session in City Hall, but in open ses- sion, with the public invited to participate with ques- tions, at Critter's bar over a breakfast of beer om- elets. Councilmember Benz stated, "It's time that the City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 2 • (b) (c) (d) City pump a little money into the local economy and buying a round for the house is a good way to start." Action: To approve the minutes of Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. 39643 through 39760 inclusive, noting voided war- rants Nos. 39648, 39649, 39650, 39702, 39703, 39704, and 39730; and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting due to his request to be able to question every- one receiving a check from the City, as one of his con- stituents believed that there might be "wasteful" pay- ments being made. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. a Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting due to his request to change the order of the agenda so that requests from Councilmembers came at the start of the meeting. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda as presented. Recommendation to receive and file the December, 1991 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report. City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 3 • 4p, (e) u o� -ted HO^ -7 (f) This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting due to questions regarding the Revenue and Expenditure report not being included. Action: To receive and file the December, 1991, finan- cial reports as presented. Recommendation to adopt proposed Rescrltroa relative to the Annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Hermosa Beach. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary Brutsch dated January 16, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting in order to congratulate City Treasurer Brutsch on a "great job" and suggest that his salary be doubled to compensate him for all his hard work and allow him to pay a higher rent. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92=5"5 entitled, HA_ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT AND FILING OF THE AN- NUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE YEAR 1992." 4J4 i Recommendation to receive and file 2nd Quarterly Report of Capital Improvement Program FY 1991-1992. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dat- ed January 13, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting due to his request that there be no more Capital Improvement Projects. He stated, "If we stop this silly sewer improvement we can abolish the 6% UUT and I'll be able to keep my campaign promise; we don't need no new stinking sewers .... after all, people just flush their poop into them and get them dirty; this way people will be afraid to flush and we can conserve a lot of water." City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 4 Action: To receive and file the Second Quarterly report of Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 1991-1992 showing 27 projects totaling $5,776,343 in budgeted expenditures. Recommendation to accept cash=rdep in lieu of exist- ing lien on property at 514 24th Street, and approve the Release of Lien Agreement for subject property. Memo- randum from Interim Public Works Director William Glick- man dated January 14, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting due to his questioning if the City could take the cash and still retain the lien, "That way the City can make a lot more money and we wouldn't have to have any businesses in town!" Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: accept the cash deposit provided to the City in lieu of the existing lien on the property at 514 24th Street; 2) approve the Release of Lien Agreement for the sub - 1) ject property; 3) authorize the Mayor Agreement; and, 4) authorize the Release corded with the County to sign the Release of Lien 1c1% rr✓ 4 1-16 1 Recommendation to accept feash d"eposi in lieu of exist- ing lien on property at 636 24th Place, and approve the Release of Lien Agreement for subject property. Memo- randum from Interim Public Works Director William Glick- man dated January 21, 1992. i of Lien Agreement to be Recorder. re - This item was removed from the consent calendar by Es- sertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. (see above) Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) accept the cash deposit provided to the City in lieu of the existing lien on the property at 636 24th Place; City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 5 2) approve the Release of Lien Agreement for the sub- ject property; 3) authorize the Mayor to sign the Release of Lien Agreement; and, 4) authorize the Release of Lien Agreement to be re- corded with the County Recorder. Recommendation to create reserve account for potential retirement contributions, and application for refund, relating to Assembly Bill 702. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated January 22, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. "We don't need no stinking retirement for these City Hall loafers," stated Benz, "If we have extra money we can buy a round for the house in EVERY bar in the City and PARTY PARTY." Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) create a reserve account for funds potentially owed to the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) for the employer portion of retirement costs, pend- ing resolution of the lawsuit over AB 702; and, 2) apply for a refund of amounts paid to PERS this fiscal year for the employers portion of PERS, with the refund received to be deposited to the reserve account. Recommendation to approve funding for Traffic Control Pre-emption (Opticom) on Pacific Coast Highway from State Gas Tax Fund, approve plans and specifications, and to call for bids, CIP 86-176. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated January 13, 1992. City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 6 (k) (1) This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting due to his concerns that emergency vehicle si- rens might disturb nearby residents, therefor the vehi- cles should not use their sirens and should use normal speeds. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve additional funding for Traffic Control Pre- emption on Pacific Coast Highway from the State Gas Tax Fund in the amount of $35,000; 2) approve funding for the project from the Grant Fund in the amount of $35,000; 3) Approve plans and specifications for CIP 86-176, Traffic Control Pre-emption, and authorize staff to call for bids on this project; and, 4) authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary. Recommendation that City Council receive and file the staff report on the upgrade of the City Council Chambers video system. Memorandum from Community Resources Di- rector Mary Rooney dated January 21, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmembers Benz and Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting due to their requests that the new system should be upgraded and implemented now. "We need a new and better sound system," shouted Benz, "the one we have now makes me sound whiny ... I don't sound whi- ny; I don't, I don't, I don't, so there." Edgerton com- plained that there should be more cameramen, "The angle of this camera doesn't get my good side, and Councilmem- bers with Law Degrees should only be photographed from their good side, we shouldn't be made to look like crookgd" Action: To receive and file the staff report on the upgrade of the City Council video system at a projected cost of $26,000. Recommendation to authorize Mayor to sign an amended "a`geiit with the Hermosa Beach School District for the allocation of $11,500 from the City to the District for City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 7 landscape maintenance services that would remove the requirement that the contractor be "state certified." Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated January 22, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting. "I won't sign it if they won't do what WE want them to do," stated Midstokke. C-47,--":---7 ---3 --- ---- ---- -2-- ‘". ) ) __..--/-----) \ ..) _z, .-__(- ---,--- „)--.=, -..., --"-`"/Action: To approve the staff recommendation. --' t (7j `1 6' '"--i � 19),,----or"..>-)h " „moo( 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - Councilmember Benz requested that -----71 the Council adopt an Ordinance allowing more consent to af \ his requests. :dall ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1(a) through (1) were heard at this time, but are shown in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar of the January 14, 1992 meeting: (f) Recommendation to authorize call for bids for removal of hazardous waste from storage shed located at Clark Field. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated November 25, 1991. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier who stated, "It's silly to spend good money to hire someone ... just bury the stuff on the beach ... if we do it at night, no one will ever know." Interim Public Works Director Glickman presented the staff report andv esponded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) authorize staff to solicit bids in the estimated amount of $7,000 from firms licensed to perform the G.1. /„T City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 8 r I (o) (r) 2 work of removal and disposal of fertilizers, herbi- cides and other chemicals related to park main- tenance (considered hazardous waste by State and County agencies) from an unreinforced masonry building located in the southwest corner of Clark Stadium that is scheduled for demolition; and, authorize staff to issue addendum as necessary. Recommendation to approve reactivation of the Housing Improvement Program (HIP). Memorandum from Planning , Director Michael Schubach dated January 6, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Recommendation to reject proposal for budgeted purchase of parking enforcement vehicles. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated December 5, 1991, with supplemental memorandum dated January 15, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting as he wished to congratulate Acting Director Staten, "I just want to say that this is a move in the right direction, now junk the enforcement vehicles and fire the Parking Enforcement Officers, and we can use the money to buy more brewskis. We'll have the economy humming soon." czj/61 r 4/L, L-) 4r7 P a 5 /77?„..,( City Council Minutes 01-28-92 page 9 (s) Acting General Services Director Staten presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) reject the proposal from Frankson's for the pur- chase of four (4) or more "cushman" type parking enforcement vehicles at a cost of $57,956; and, 2) direct staff to consider alternative type vehicles for use by Parking Enforcement and re -bid the purchase. Recommendation to authorize staff to close the driveway entrance to the Greenbelt Parking Lot at Valley Drive and 11th Street and to post signs at the entrance to the lot north of 11th Place restricting parking by prohibit- ing certain vehicles. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated January 8, 1992; with supplemental memorandum dated January 22, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting Interim Public Works Director Glickman presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to close the driveway entrance to the Greenbelt Parking Lot at Valley Drive and 11th Street and to post signs at the entrance to the lot north of 11th Place stating, "Re- stricted Parking, No Parking At Any Time 'Tow -Away' Tractors, Trailers, Trucks In Excess of 2 Tons, Boats and Boat Trailers. H.B.M.C., Section 19-80.", and to approve the staff supplemental recommendations to: 1) design and install entranceway signs constructed of wood and having carved letters rather than the standard metal highway signs, as these signs will blend in better with the surrounding landscaped area; 2) add to the parking restrictions, "No Parking, 2:00 AM to 6:00 AM, ALL VEHICLES", as considered at the joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting held on December 12, 1991; and, 3) consider the permanent closure of the southerly driveway by construction of a concrete curb along Valley Drive rather than the use of telephone poles and/or railroad ties as previously recommended, City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 10 • (t) because this entrance will probably not be needed in the future. Motion , second . So ordered. Recommendation to adopt soi uti ;for plan checking and inspection fees for public improvements, and to approve the fees to be applied against funds on deposit and presently held by the City. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated December 19, 1991. This item had been removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting and was subsequently continued. Interim Public Works Director Glickman presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. /Al /Lk (u) Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) adopt Resolution No. 92-55 , entitled, "A RESOLU- TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 90-5422, SCHEDULE 5, ADDING PLAN CHECKING AND INSPECTION FEES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS."; and, 2) approve the fees to be applied against funds on deposit and presently held by the City. Motion , second . So ordered. Recommendation to approve the purchase of sixty-one "tamper -proof" Duncan meters, at a cost not to exceed $10,000, to replace a portion of the POM meters current- ly in use. Memorandum from Acting General Services Di- rector Henry L. Staten dated December 12, 1992. This item had been removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting and was subsequently continued. City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 11 Acting General Services Director Staten presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to purchase sixty-one (61) "tamper -proof" Duncan parking meters, at a cost not to exceed the $10,000 amount budgeted, in order to replace a portion of the 800 currently used Pom meters; and noting that Duncan is the sole source for this specific type of tamper proof meter and this pur- chase complies with H.B.M.C. Section 2-55. Motion , second . So ordered. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Paul Hennessey, owner of Lighthouse Cafe, dated January 3, 1992, with supplemental letter received January 13, 1992, regarding installation of second door at rear of the Lighthouse. Recommendation: To continue the requirement for double doors at rear. (This item continued from January 14, 1992.) Proposed Action: To approve the staff recommendation to continue the requirement for double doors at the rear of the business. Motion , second The motion failed due to the dis- senting votes of Benz and Edgerton. Proposed Action: To waive the requirement for double doors at the rear of the business. Motion , second . The motion failed due to the dis- senting votes of Essertier and Mayor Midstokke. City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 12 Action: To continue this item to the meeting of February 11, 1992, for a full Council vote. Motion ,,second . So ordered. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF DENIAL BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY AND ZONE CHANGE FROM C-2 TO R-2 AT 64 TENTH STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 21, 1992. Supplemental letters from Stephen P. Shoemaker, Jr., 123 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, dated January 26, 1992, and, Imogene James, 60 10th Street, dated January 25, 1992. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing was opened at g:.5 -Z, P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Lr/4. i GYM AiAz>097" The public hearing was closed at 2:5 .P.M.O�� 44:4 change Action: approve the sta recommend tion to continue the item to the meeting of F bruary 25, 992, to expand the area of onsideration to 'nclude the other half of City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 13 • lot 16 to th south of e subject property and also the lot to the e t, by adop ion of Re-olution No. 92-55 , entitled, "A SOLUTION 0 INTENT 0 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF H.RMOSA BEA , CALIFOIA, TO CONSIDER A GENERAL PLAN AM DMENT AND ZONE CHANG' FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HERMOS AVENUE 10TH STRE•T INCLUDING LOTS 16 AND 17, BLOCK 0, HERMOSA BEACH TRAC " Motion , second . The otion carr ed, noting the dissenting vote of change Action: To Introduce 0 dinance No 92-106 . Motion , second The motion carried, oting the dissenting vote of change Final Acti. : To waiv= further readi of Ordinance No. 92-106 , entitled, "AN ►RDINANCE OF TH. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BE CH, CALIFORNI CHANGING THE ZONING MAP FR. C-2, RESTR CTED COMMERCIA , TO R-2 TWO- FAMILY RESIDENT L FOR THE CEL AT 64 •TH STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW SHOWN ON HE ATTACHED ► P AND ADOP- TION OF AN ENVIRO ENTAL NEGAT VE DECLARATIO Motion , second AYES: NOES: deny Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-55)x, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO SUSTAIN THE DECISION OF THE PLAN- NING COMMISSION TO DENY A REQUEST FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND A ZONE CHANGE FROM C-2, RESTRICTED COM- MERCIAL TO R-2, TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, FOR THE PARCEL AT 64 10TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE NORTHERLY 57 FEET OF LOT 16, BLOCK 10, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT." Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of approve Action: adopt Reso ution No. 92- 5 , entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CAL ORNIA, ING THE GE'ERAL PLAN FROM GENERAL COMM CIAL TO ME IUM DENSITY R =IDENTIAL AT 64 City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 14 6. 10 TH STRE T AS DESCRI TACHED MAP ADOPTION DECLARATION.' Motion , s$cond Th dissenting vot of D BELOW AND SH)WN ON THE AT - OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE motion carried, noting the --- PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW DAY CARE FACILITIES FOR 13 OR MORE CHILDREN AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE R-1 ZONE AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION, WITH`+(ORDINNNCE.FOR INTRODUCTION. Memoran- dum from Planningi`Director Michael Schubach dated January 16, 1992. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing was opened at 9:0r P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: 164.044, e.,-> 2 6)& e e -AA -a -P a t� �/� /9C s—/ ygY -4 . --7/‘- ,,i__7 /t#ID-,--a, u ,,, ---m_. �0, 3 - "•--' -- ) 6 C-s,1�.-, t,_1 A;t-,4_,_) 145.0,--1 //s.- - 7f1----44 - - 7 ,---) 1.ar --. /-, -----7, ---- 5, /--`2,-.1z?.-- f_3.._( ..--,--r...--- V /7L rte, i(_,-/ Zl �) a ,,04-1L e -&.)v- �%' " �. w = em-- •--' --a2,2_,0 2z.._ ,-2---.7-'a-, _-moi Lce`""-' ��, ) 012/x- J PJ 4(----1-°- , d, Jai ,� i• .) �-g-''' , f:7 , -,C2-, The public hearing was closed at 9:6° P.M. (� 6, ‘--1.,01//',m �' % �' Action: 'To approve the Planning Commission an staff recommendation to introduce Ordinance No. 92-106. Motion / , second/? . The motion carried,_ noting the dissenting vote of e ,f x/7,86 0�-PCity Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 15 z et* /44- d Final Act n: To waive further reading ofOrdinance No. 92-106 , entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO ALLOW DAY NURSERIES, PRE- _ SCHOOLS, AND AFTER SCHOOL CHILD CARE FACILITIES WITH c7---� --THIRTEEN (13) OR MORE CHILDREN AS A CONDITIONALLY PER- MITTED USE IN THE R-1 ZONE, AND AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 10, OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOR GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR SUCH FACILITIES AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion /V, Second �a1 AYES: A -e NOES: - HEARINGS 7. /"11Pe / y�� APPROVAL OF STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH PLANS/ SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL TO GO TO BID. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dat- ed January 21, 1992. Supplemental letter from Donna English, 2240 Strand, dated January 27, 1992. Interim Public Works Director Glickman presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: /kL"") -21 0-- ,e ---.02r v —Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: approve the plans and specifications for the Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Path, CIP 90-144. Said plans and specifications are on file in the City Clerk's office and the Department of Public Works for review; authorize staff to the Strand Bikeway and, authorize staff to r D 3) solicit construction bids for and Pedestrian Path project; issue addenda as necessary 1 Y� 7—Z >✓ Po )— --� City Council inutes 01-28-92 Page 16 c. .0-';6./451,— �i tA-47,,,iam'' ) -d-er 1/46� within budget /, Motion , second UNICIPAL MATTERS limitations. . The motion carried unanimously. RECOMMENDATION TO POSTPONE AN ADDITIONAL SIB MONTHS THE CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF A PARKING PLAN AT 415 PIER AVENUE, PER REQUEST OF LAWRENCE M. DAVID, M.D. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 22, 1992. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address Jack Wood - the Council on this item was: 200 Pier Avenue, #38, Action: To approve the staff recommendation to postpone the item for an additional six months. Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Mayor Midstokke. Action: To officially sustain the Planning Commission's decision to deny the request. Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 17 • 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Setting of date for joint meeting of City Council, Cham- ber of Commerce and Planning Commission. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated January 9, 1992. (Continued from January 14, 1992 meeting.) Action: To set a joint meeting with the City Council, the School District, and the Planning Commission for _March of 1992 on either the second or third Thursday night of the month. Motion , second So ordered. 0 U Action: To set a joint meeting with the City Council, the Planning Commission, and the Chamber of Commerce for Motion , second . So ordered. Action: To set a joint meeting between the City Council and the Planning Commission for June of 1992 on either the second or third Thursday night of the month. Motion , second . So ordered. Mayor Midstokke reported 11. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Actions: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss the item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 18 • 711/4-e- c;1___D (1,6 ved, -2q) (a) 4,/ 1/(0 //v" Request by Councilmember Edgerton for review of the es- tablishment of a police commission as suggested by prior Council to assist in the budget cutting process. Action: ,jY-eat 41 1(614° (b) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for discussion of a review of Boccato's conditional use permit. 6042o4.9 Gam, (eiv (c) Action: Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of his mem- os to Council dated December. 29, 1991 and January 7, 1992. Action: -71) /fr'9/#,0*'--7) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for staff review and research whether the trailer park owners intend to apply for a zone change and propose safeguard measures for tenants as necessary if and when zone change is requested. Action: City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 19 • (e) (f) (g) Request by Councilmember Edgerton to have staff provide a short history of subdivision of Biltmore site and re- cent lot merger actions city-wide. Action: Request by Councilmember Edgerton for review and discus- sion of prior City Council directive of 9/24/91 consent calendar Item 1(h) to receive and file staff recommenda- tion to recruit Public Works Director. Action: Request by Councilmember Edgerton to direct staff to prepare an agenda item regarding business license fees and tax penalties. Action: CITIZEN COMMENTS 4 - Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: ) _ ,f./ i• ---zr- if, Co-c.v.-, e9--, ....?. cr - - 9 /7,,A,,z- //-1_,_,,,, z.- --f ilo- Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh4Street, June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, Dave Reimer. - 802 Monterey Blvd., 6---ae --7 . *a(ad -s City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 20 • Jerry Compton - 832 Seventh Street, Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, January 29, 1992, at the hour of 1::4:;5 A.M. to the Special Meeting to be held on Saturday, February 1, 1992 at the hour of 9:30 A.M. for the purpose of conducting City Manager applicant interviews. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 01-28-92 Page 21 Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or oral- ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet com- pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before. the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be- gin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. . The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni- ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or- dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi- nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. • `77A-x-74/4 ”Those who who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." -George Santayana AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 28, 1992 - Council Chambers, City Hall MAYOR Kathleen Midstokke MAYOR PRO TEM Robert Essertier COUNCILMEMBERS Robert Benz Sam Y. Edgerton Albert Wiemans Closed Session - 7:15 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch INTERIM CITY MANAGER Steve Wisniewski CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart- ment, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Cham- ber of Commerce. During the meeting a packet also is available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL STUDENT OF THE MONTH: Jordan Rushins PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. - 1 - (a) (b) * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on January 14, 1992; 2) Special meeting of the City Council held on January 18, 1992. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive, and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the December, 1991 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report. (e) Recommendation to receive and file the Annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Hermosa Beach. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary Brutsch dated January 16, 1992. (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) Recommendation to receive and file 2nd Quarterly Report of Capital Improvement Program FY 1991-1992. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dat- ed January 13, 1992. Recommendation to accept cash deposit in lieu of exist- ing lien on property at 514 24th Street, and approve the Release of Lien Agreement for subject property. Memo- randum from Interim Public Works Director William Glick- man dated January 14, 1992. Recommendation to accept cash deposit in lieu of exist- ing lien on property at 636 24th Place, and approve the Release of Lien Agreement for subject property. Memo- randum from Interim Public Works Director William Glick- man dated January 21, 1992. Recommendation to create reserve account for potential retirement contributions, and application for refund, relating to Assembly Bill 702. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated January 22, 1992. Recommendation to approve funding for Traffic Control Pre-emption (Opticom) on Pacific Coast Highway from State Gas Tax Fund, approve plans and specifications, (k) (1) and to call for bids, CIP 86-176. Memorandum fromIn- terim Public Works Director William Glickman dated January 13, 1992. Recommendation that City Council receive and file the staff report on the upgrade of the City Council Chambers video system. Memorandum from Community Resources Di- rector Mary Rooney dated January 21, 1992. Recommendation to authorize Mayor to sign an amended agreement with the Hermosa Beach School District for the allocation of $11,500 from the City to the District for landscape maintenance services that would remove the requirement that the contractor be estate certified." Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated January 22, 1992. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar of the January 14, 1992 meeting: (f) (o) (r) (s) (t) Recommendation to authorize call for bids for removal of hazardous waste from storage shed located at Clark Field. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated November 25, 1991. Recommendation to approve reactivation of the Housing Improvement Program (HIP). Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 6, 1992. Recommendation to reject proposal for budgeted purchase of parking enforcement vehicles. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated December 5, 1991, with supplemental memorandum dated January 15, 1992. Recommendation to authorize staff to close the driveway entrance to the Greenbelt Parking Lot at Valley Drive and 11th Street and to post signs at the entrance to the lot north of 11th Place restricting parking by prohibit- ing certain vehicles. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated January 8, 1992; with supplemental memorandum dated January 22, 1992. Recommendation to adopt resolution for plan checking and inspection fees for public improvements, and to approve the fees to be applied against funds on deposit and presently held by the City. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated December 19, 1991. (u) 4. (a) Recommendation to approve the purchase of sixty-one "tamper -proof" Duncan meters, at a cost not to exceed $10,000, to replace a portion of the POM meters current- ly in use. Memorandum from Acting General Services Di- rector Henry L. Staten dated December 12, 1992. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. Letter from Paul Hennessey, owner of Lighthouse Cafe, dated January 3, 1992, with supplemental letter received January 13, 1992, regarding installation of second door at rear of the Lighthouse. Recommendation: To continue the requirement for double doors at rear. (This item continued from January 14, 1992.) PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. APPEAL OF DENIAL BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY AND ZONE CHANGE FROM C-2 TO R-2 AT 64 TENTH STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 21, 1992. 6. PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW DAY CARE FACILITIES FOR 13 OR MORE CHILDREN AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE R-1 ZONE AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 16, 1992. HEARINGS: 7. APPROVAL OF STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH PLANS/ SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL TO GO TO BID. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dat- ed January 21, 1992. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. RECOMMENDATION TO POSTPONE AN ADDITIONAL SIX MONTHS THE CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF A PARKING PLAN AT 415 PIER AVENUE, PER REQUEST OF LAWRENCE M. DAVID, M.D. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 22, 1992. 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Setting of date for joint meeting of City Council, Cham- ber of Commerce and Planning Commission. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated January 9, 1992. (Continued from January 14, 1992 meeting.) 11. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Actions: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss the item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. (a) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for review of the es- tablishment of a police commission as suggested by prior Council to assist in the budget cutting process. (b) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for discussion of a review of Boccato's conditional use permit. (c) Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of his mem- os to Council dated December 29, 1991 and January 7, 1992. (d) (e) (f) (g) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for staff review and research whether the trailer park owners intend to apply for a zone change and propose safeguard measures for tenants as necessary if and when zone change is requested. Request by Councilmember Edgerton to have staff provide a short history of subdivision of Biltmore site and re- cent lot merger actions city-wide. Request by Councilmember Edgerton for review and discus- sion of prior City Council directive of 9/24/91 consent calendar Item 1(h) to receive and file staff recommenda- tion to recruit Public Works Director. Request by Councilmember Edgerton to direct staff to prepare an agenda item regarding business license fees and tax penalties. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT ACTION SHEET ACTION SHEET REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 28, 1992 - Council Chambers, City Hall. Closed Session - 7:15 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. CONVENED AT 7:40 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY JORDAN KUSHINS ROLL CALL: COUNCILMEMBER WIEMANS ABSENT HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL STUDENT OF THE MONTH: Jordan Kushins ANNOUNCEMENTS: MAYOR ANNOUNCED (1) THAT THE SPRING RECREATION BROCHURE HAS BEEN MAILED TO ALL RESIDENTS, AND FEB. 11 WILL BE PRIORITY REGISTRATION FOR CLASSES, AND (2) WEDNESDAY NIGHT THERE WILL BE A FUND RAISER FOR R/UDAT PROGRAM AT THE LIGHTHOUSE FROM 5 TO 9 P.M. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PARKER HERRIOTT - SPOKE OF PETITION RE. OPEN SPACE PARK AT BILT- MORE SITE. SAYS HAS 1200 SIGNATURES, NEEDS 600 MORE SIGNATURES.. ELEANOR LYNN, PARK AVE. - RE. WEST BASIN WATER ASOCIATION RESOLU- TION PASSED AT LAST MEETING. HAS BEEN ATTENDING THE MEETINGS OF WEST BASIN RE. WATER SURCHARGE FOR RECYCLING. TAX BILLS IN HER- MOSA SHOW A $10 SURCHARGE THIS YEAR, AND IS NOW GOING TO $30 PER PARCEL. WOULD LIKE SOMEONE IN CITY TO BE REPRESENTING H.B. AT THE MEETINGS. WILMA BURT - ALSO OBJECTED TO WATER FEES. SAID IT IS UP TO CITY COUNCIL TO DO SOMETHING. GENE DREHER THANKED WM. GLICKMAN FOR HAVING HIS CREWS FILL IN THE CREVICES ON 7TH PLACE. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on January 14, 1992; 2) Special meeting of the City Council held on January 18, 1992. PULLED BY RB - ADD TO 1/14 MINUTES, ITEM 1(g) RE. SIDEWALK REPAIRS "AND HE STATED IT WAS SATISFACTORILY COMPLETED". ALSO MAKE CHANGE RE- QUESTED BY HOWARD LONGACRE ON PAGE 7675 UNDER HIS COMMENTS TO 1 DELETE THE WORDS "TO REMOVE THE DEBRIS" APPEARING AFTER $20,000. KM/RB TO APPROVE MINUTES. SO ORDERED. (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive, and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. PULLED BY RB - ASKED ABOUT SW CHECK FOR $50,000. STEVE EXPLAINED THAT IT WAS FLASH MONEY. ALSO QUESTIONED HP TERMINAL MAINTENANCE WARRANT FOR $3,069, STEVE WISNIEWSKI WILL CHECK. RB/KM TO RATIFY THE WARRANTS. SO ORDERED. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the December, 1991 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report. (e) Recommendation to receive and file the Annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Hermosa Beach. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary Brutsch dated January 16, 1992. PULLED BY RE - GLB MENTIONED HIS AMENDMENT TO STATEMENT RESOLUTION. JUNE WILLIAMS - WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOMETHING IN WRITING THAT WE HER UNDERSTANDING IS THAT MERRILL LYNCH ONLY HAS ONLY $2 MILLION INSURANCE FOR FRAUD AND THEFT. WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOMETHING IN WRITING THAT WE ARE COVERED. MOTION RE/SE ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 92-5517 RE. INVESTMENT POLICY. SO ORDERED. (f) (g) Recommendation to receive and file 2nd Quarterly Report of Capital Improvement Program FY 1991-1992. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dat- ed January 13, 1992. Recommendation to accept cash deposit in lieu of exist- ing lien on property at 514 24th Street, and approve the Release of Lien Agreement for subject property. Memo- randum from Interim Public Works Director William Glick- man dated January 14, 1992. PULLED BY KM - QUESTIONED WHY THESE CASH DEPOSITS AND LIEN AGREE- MENTS HAS TO COME TO COUNCIL. MOTION KM/RE TO APPROVE BOTH G AND H WITH STAFF TO LOOK INTO AND DETERMINE WHETHER THEY NEED TO BE ON AGENDA. SO ORDERED. (h) Recommendation to accept cash deposit in lieu of exist- ing lien on property at 636 24th Place, and approve the Release of Lien Agreement for subject property. Memo- randum from Interim Public Works Director William Glick- man dated January 21, 1992. SEE ITEM G ABOVE FOR ACTION. (i) .(j) (k) Recommendation to create reserve account for potential retirement contributions, and application for refund, relating to Assembly Bill 702. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated January 22, 1992. Recommendation to approve funding for Traffic Control Pre-emption (Opticom) on Pacific Coast Highway from State Gas Tax Fund, approve plans and specifications, and to call for bids, CIP 86-176. Memorandum fromIn- terim Public Works Director William Glickman dated January 13, 1992. Recommendation that City Council receive and file the staff report on the upgrade of the City Council Chambers video system. Memorandum from Community Resources Di- rector Mary Rooney dated January 21, 1992. PULLED BY KM - FEELS NEW CAMERA NEEDED AND IMPROVE LIGHTING. WOULD LIKE TO HOLD OVER TO MID -YEAR BUDGET REVIEW AND SEE IF IT CAN BE FUNDED. MOTION KM/RE TO HOLD OVER TO MIDYEAR REVIEW TO SEE IF THERE IS MONEY FOR A NEW CAMERA. SO ORDERED. (1) Recommendation to authorize Mayor to sign an amended agreement with the Hermosa Beach School District for the allocation of $11,500 from the City to the District for landscape maintenance services that would remove the requirement that the contractor be estate certified." Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated January 22, 1992. PULLED BY KM - CATHY MCCURDY STATED THE GARDENER HAS INSURANCE THROUGH SCHOOL AND HAS CITY BUSINESS LICENSE. MOTION KM/SE TO APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH CHANGE LANGUAGE ON PAGE 6 SECTION (H) DELETE PROVISIONS. OK 3-1 (RE -NO). MOTION KM/RE TO APPROVE REST OF CONSENT CALENDAR. SO ORDERED. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. The following -items were pulled from the Consent Calendar of the January 14, 1992 meeting: 3 (f) Recommendation to authorize call for bids for removal of hazardous waste from storage shed located at Clark Field. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated November 25, 1991. PULLED BY RE MOTION RB/RE TO SEND BACK TO STAFF TO DETERMINE WHICH ITEMS ARE TRULY HAZARDOUS AND CANNOT BE CONSUMED FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED, AND DIRECT STAFF TO BRING BACK ANOTHER PROPOSAL. OK 3-1 (SE -NO) (o) Recommendation to approve reactivation of the Housing Improvement Program (HIP). Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 6, 1992. PULLED BY KM MOTION KM/RB TO HOLD TO NEXT MEETING FOR AW TO BE PRESENT. SO ORDERED. (r) Recommendation to reject proposal for budgeted purchase of parking enforcement vehicles. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated December 5, 1991, with supplemental memorandum dated January 15, 1992. PULLED BY RB MOTION RB/RE TO PUT ON HOLD AND NOT GO OUT TO BID. FAILS 3-1 (RB -YES) MOTION KM/RE TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. OK 3-1 (RB -NO) (s) Recommendation to authorize staff to close the driveway entrance to the Greenbelt Parking Lot at Valley Drive and 11th Street and to post signs at the entrance to the lot north of 11th Place restricting parking by prohibit- ing certain vehicles. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated January 8, 1992; with supplemental memorandum dated January 22, 1992. PULLED BY RE MOTION RE/KM TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AS ORIGINALLY GIVEN AS WELL AS NOS. 2 AND 3, OF SUPPLEMENTAL MEMO BUT ELIMINATE NO. 1 STATED IN SUPPLEMENTAL MEMO. OK 4-0. (t) Recommendation to adopt resolution for plan checking and inspection fees for public improvements, and to approve the fees to be applied against funds on deposit and presently held by the City. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated December 19, 1991. PULLED BY RE MOTION KM/RB TO RECEIVE & FILE. OK 3-1 (SE -NO). (u) Recommendation to approve the purchase of sixty-one 'stamper -proof,. Duncan meters, at a cost not to exceed $10,000, to replace a portion of the POM meters current- ly in use. Memorandum from Acting General Services Di- rector Henry L. Staten dated December 12, 1992. PULLED BY RB MOTION RB/KM TO DENY THE PURCHASE. OK 3-1 (RE -NO) 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Paul Hennessey, owner of Lighthouse Cafe, dated January 3, 1992, with supplemental letter received January 13, 1992, regarding installation of second door at rear of the Lighthouse. Recommendation: To continue the requirement for double doors at rear. (This item continued from January 14, 1992.) MOTION SE/RE TO APPROVE STAFF REC. TO IMPOSE THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DOUBLE DOORS. OK 3-1 (RB -NO). PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. APPEAL OF DENIAL BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY AND ZONE CHANGE FROM C-2 TO R-2 AT 64 TENTH STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 21, 1992. MOTION RB/SE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 92-5518 TO SUSTAIN P.C. DECISION TO DENY REQUEST. WAIT FOR R/UDAT STUDY, IF R/UDAT FEELS SHOULD BE REZONED, WILL TAKE UPON THEMSELVES RATHER THAN PUT BUR- DEN ON APPELLANT. OK 4-0. 6. PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW DAY CARE FACILITIES FOR 13 OR MORE CHILDREN AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE R-1 ZONE AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION, WITH ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 16, 1992. BILL BECK - APPLICANT, WILMA BURT - OPPOSED. JEFF BROOKS, OWNER OF 739 LONGFELLOW. JIM MCDONALD, M.B. FRANCIS PARKER, 521-1/2 LOMA DRIVE. EDIE WEBBER - WANTED TO KNOW IF EACH APPLICANT WOULD NEED A CUP. ERIC SIMMON - SAID REQUIREMENT FOR SQ. FTGE. PER CHILD WOULD BE ABOUT 35 SQ. FT. IS IN FAVOR. LEO WOODS, 731 LONGFELLOW. OPPOSED. CONNIE PROUT, M.B. IN FAVOR. TOM GREENWOOD, 736 LONGFELLOW. OPPOSED. RAY PRAWN, R.B. - IN FAVOR. JULIE BECK - IN FAVOR. ? MOSER, R.B.IN FAVOR. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION RB/KM TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. 92-1064. SE SPOKE AGAINST IT BECAUSE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INTRUSION. VOTE: OK 3-1 (SE -NO). HEARINGS: 7. APPROVAL OF STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH PLANS/ SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL TO GO TO BID. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dat- ed January 21, 1992. JOSEPH DIMONDA JAMES BELL 3500 STRAND JOHN RYAN, 229 LONGFELLOW GENE DREHER JIM LISSNER PATRICIA ? JAMIE LAMPKIN JERRY COMPTON MOTION KM/RB TO CONTINUE TO NEXT MEETING TO GIVE COUNCIL MORE TME TO LOOK AT, AND WM. GLICKMAN TO GET IN TOUCH WITH FUNDING SOURCE AND FIND OUT THE EXACT SPECIFICS OF WHEN WE MUST HAVE IT IN PROG- RESS. SEE ABOUT ASKING FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME. SE CONCERNED ABOUT NORTHERLY SECTION OF STRAND NOT BEING INCLUDED. ACTION ON MOTION. OK 4-0. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. RECOMMENDATION TO POSTPONE AN ADDITIONAL SIX MONTHS THE CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF A PARKING PLAN AT 415 PIER AVENUE, PER REQUEST OF LAWRENCE M. DAVID, M.D. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 22, 1992. MOTION KM/SE TO ADOPT ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION DENYING THE REQUEST. SO ORDERED. 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Setting of date for joint meeting of City Council, Cham- ber of Commerce and Planning Commission. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated January 9, 1992. (Continued from January 14, 1992 meeting.) MOTION KM/RB TO SET MEETING FOR SECOND OR THIRD THURSDAY IN MAY SO ORDERED. 11. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Actions: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss the item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. (a) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for review of the es- tablishment of a police commission as suggested by prior Council to assist in the budget cutting process. MOTION RB/SE TO DISCUSS. OK 4-0. MOTION SE/RB TO HAVE EACH C.C. MEMBER PICK A CITIZEN, POA PICK ONE PERSON, WISNIEWSKI ONE, AND ONE STAFF. VOTE: 2-2 (MOTION FAILS) . (b) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for discussion of a review of Boccato's conditional use permit. CONTINUE TO NEXT MEETING. (c) Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of his mem- os to Council dated December 29, 1991 and January 7, 1992. MOTION RB/SE TO DISCUSS. FAILS 2-2 (KM/RE-NO). RE LEFT CHAMBER. (d) (e) (f) (g) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for staff review and research whether the trailer park owners intend to apply for a zone change and propose safeguard measures for tenants as necessary if and when zone change is requested. Request by Councilmember Edgerton to have staff provide a short history of subdivision of Biltmore site and re- cent lot merger actions city-wide. Request by Councilmember Edgerton for review and discus- sion of prior City Council directive of 9/24/91 consent calendar Item 1(h) to receive and file staff recommenda- tion to recruit Public Works Director. Request by Councilmember Edgerton to direct staff to prepare an agenda item regarding business license fees and tax penalties. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. MARK MORENO - RE. PARK PACIFIC SHOPPING CENTER. WANTS RECON- SIDERATION ON HHETHER CITY SHOULD PAY FOR ANY PART OF PEER STUDY. DAVE REIMER, MONTEREY BLVD. - COMPLAINED ABOUT COST OF PARKING PERMITS. ADJOURNMENT AT 1:55 A.M. �o '266.V a--,A-•t o. 74, 75 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, January 14, 1992, at the hour of 7:45 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - The closed session was held at 7:05 P.M. regard- ing matters of employee meet and confer; and, matters of person- nel. The closed session was recessed at 7:42 P.M. to the regular scheduled public meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Laurie Duke, Council Secretary ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Wiemans, Mayor Midstokke Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS - Mayor Midstokke announced that tickets were being sold by Chamber of Commerce audience members for the buffet din- ner and jazz concert to be held January 29, 1992, at $10 per per- son, to raise funds for R/UDAT, a comprehensive program to revi- talize the downtown area. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Robert Udovich - Brooklyn Brick Oven Pizza owner, questioned the action of the Council regarding their directive of November 12, 1991, for Vons Market to restripe the parking lot or stop delivering pizza by December 1, 1991, and why that was not carried out; claimed the minutes were incorrect and will submit a tape for review; Martin Moreno - 1326 Corona Street, questioned item #6 of the December 10, 1991 agenda, the Park Pacific ingress and egress problem; felt that the two items should have been voted upon separately and that $3,500 of public funds should not have been voted for a traffic study to benefit a private development; requested that this item be reconsidered as two motions; June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, suggested that the Council take emergency action on item No. 4(b) of the agenda and act on a temporary suspension of the Banner Ordinance. Interim City Manager Wisniewski responded that this item had been requested withdrawn by the Cham- ber of Commerce; Wesley Bush - Chamber of Commerce, questioned if the Council had taken action on the LACTC, "Green Line", hearing on January 22, 1992, and if the Council intended to support the group that was trying to have the contract recon- sidered in order to have the work go to an City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 76611 \ C� American firm. Mayor Midstokke asked that in- formation be left for review by any individual Councilmember; Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, regarding item No. 1(q) relating to the "Green Line"; felt there was a deliberate effort by CalTrans to make Prospect Avenue a collector street; re- quested the double yellow line on Prospect be replaced by a single line in order to make resident access to the street easier; requested the proposed left turn signal at Aviation Boulevard not be considered; requested to speak before the vote on items 1(0) and (p); and, Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, suggested that Council direct staff to revise the Building Code to require more soundproofing in new con- struction. Mayor Midstokke asked if this could be included for discussion in the Housing Ele- ment review by the H.I.P. committee. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (u), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3 but are listed in order for clarity: (a) Benz, (b) Benz, (d) Benz, (f) Essertier, (g) Benz, (1) Edgerton, (o) Mayor Midstokke, (p) Edgerton, (r) Benz, (s) Essertier, (t) Essertier, and (u) Benz. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. The order of the agenda was suspended at 8:09 P.M. in orderto hear item No. 9. and then go to the public hearing items starting at No. 5. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the following meetings: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on. December 10, 1991; 2) Special joint workshop meeting with the Planning Commission held on December 12, 1991. 3) Special meeting of City Council held on December 23, 1991. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. Councilmember Benz stated his objection to the minutes of the Special Meeting of December 23, 1991: that there was no need for a closed session as he felt he had the right to examine all resumes for the position of City Manager; and submitted a letter containing his proposed amendments to those minutes. City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 7662 (b) Proposed Action: To approve the minutes of December 10 and 12, 1991 as presented, and to approve the minutes of the Special Meeting of December 23, 1991 as amended in copy submitted by Councilmember Benz. Motion Benz. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Final Action: To approve the minutes of December 10, 12 and 23, 1991 as presented. Motion Essertier, second Edgerton. So ordered, noting the objection of Benz and the abstention of Mayor Mid- stokke on the minutes of the Special meeting of December 23, 1991 due to her absence from that meeting. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants No. 39204 and Nos. 39273 through 39642 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 39274, 39275, 39276, 39309, 39310, 39361, 39362, 39375, 39447, 39448, 39474, 39508, 39509, 39510, 39511, 39563, 39564,' 39565, 39590, 39596, and 39597. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. Personnel Director Blackwood responded to Council questions. Mayor Midstokke directed, with the consensus of the Council, that a copy of the monthly check register (showing individual payments to attorneys) was to be received by Councilmember Benz in his Thursday mail from the City's Liability Claim Administrator. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. Motion Benz, second Mayor Midstokke. So ordered. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the November, 1991 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure reports; 2) City Treasurer's report. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To receive and file the November, 1991, finan- cial reports as presented. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Benz. So ordered. City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 7663 (e) (f) (g) (h) Recommendation to approve request for 30 day extension of temporary appointment for the Acting General Services Director and one General Services Officer. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated January 2, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation. Recommendation to authorize call for bids for removal of hazardous waste from storage shed located at Clark Field. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated November 25, 1991. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: Mayor Midstokke directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the meeting of January 28, 1992. Recommendation to accept sidewalk repairs, FY 1991-92 as complete (CIP 89-142) and authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Completion. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated December 10, 1991. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. Interim Public Works Director Glickman responded to Council questions to explain that the projects had been inspected and approved by the City's full time Public Works inspector. 0....0,w() -a-4-44 Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) accept as complete the FY 1991-92 project for Side- walk Repairs, CIP 89-142, performed by Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. at a cost of $33,712.92; 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Comple- tion; and, 3) authorize staff to: a) release the retention payment to Los Angeles Engineering, Inc.; and, b) release Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. from the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Materials Bond. Motion Benz, second Mayor Midstokke. So ordered. Recommendation to accept a cash deposit in lieu of ex- isting lien on property located at 922 15th Place and approve a release of Lien Agreement. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated December 12, 1991. City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 7664 Action: To approve`the staff recommendation to: 1) accept the cash deposit provided to the City in lieu of the existing lien on the property at 922 15th Place; 2) approve the Release or Lien Agreement for the sub- ject property; 3) authorize the Mayor to sign the Release of Lien Agreement; and, 4) authorize the Release of Lien Agreement to be re- corded with the County Recorder. (i) Recommendation to release cash deposit and accept new Lien Agreement on property located at 580 21st Street. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated December 17, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) accept the new Lien Agreement provided to the City in lieu of the existing Cash Deposit on the proper- ty at 580 21st Street; 2) approve the Release of the Cash Deposit for the subject property; 3) authorize the Mayor to sign the new Lien Agreement; and, 4) authorize the new Lien Agreement to be recorded with the County Recorder. (j) Recommendation to receive and file the December, 1991 monthly investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated January 2, 1992. Action: To receive and file the December, 1991, monthly investment report as presented. (k) Recommendation to adopt a resolution in support of the West Basin Water Recycling Project. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-5512, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF THE WEST BASIN WATER RECYCLING PROJECT." (1) Recommendation to adopt a resolution approving the sale of the City's Prop A funds. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 7, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting. Planning Director Schubach responded to Council ques- tions to explain that this sale had been approved pre- viously by the Council in order to balance the budget; City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 7665 this was the best price that currently could be ob- tained; and had not yet been approved by the West Holly- wood City Council. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, to speak in favor of this sale, but in opposition to the tax that generated the Prop A funds. (m) (n) (o) Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) adopt Resolution No. 92-5516, entitled, "A RESOLU- TION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AU- THORIZING THE TRANSFER OF $200,000 IN PROPOSITION A TRANSIT FUNDS IN EXCHANGE FOR $106,000 IN GENERAL FUNDS FROM THE CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD."; and, 2) revise the 1991-92 budget to reflect general fund revenue from the fund exchange of $106,000 and an appropriation of $200,000 from the Proposition A fund for the payment to the City of West Hollywood. Motion Edgerton, second Essertier. So ordered, noting the objection of Mayor Midstokke. Recommendation to approve lease renewal between City of Hermosa Beach and Hope Chapel for Room 13 at the Com- munity Center. Memorandum from Community Resources Di- rector Mary Rooney dated December 16, 1991. Action: To approve the one year lease renewal between the City of Hermosa Beach and Hope Chapel for Room 13 at the Community Center at a rate of $1,030 per month ($.80 X 1,288 sq. ft.) for the period of February 1, 1992 through June 30, 1992 and at a rate of $1,082 per month ($.84 X 1,288 sq. ft.) for the period of July 1, 1992 through January 31, 1993. Recommendation to approve lease renewal between City of Hermosa Beach and the Hermosa Beach Historical Society for space at the Community Center. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 26, 1991. Action: To approve the five year lease renewal between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Hermosa Beach Histori- cal Society for the West Locker Room (880 sq. ft.) for a meeting room and a museum (excluding adjacent hallway, restroom and storage area) and Room 6D (117 sq. ft.) at the rate of one dollar ($1.00) per year paid annually on second day of February for the period of February 1, 1992 through January 31, 1997. Recommendation to approve reactivation of the Housing Improvement Program (HIP). Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 6, 1992. City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 7666 (p) This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Midstokke,for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: Mayor Midstokke directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the meeting of January 28, 1992. Recommendation to approve the request and contract for C.E. Sports and Entertainment to host a 4 -man profes- sional volleyball tournament, April 25-26, 1992. Memo- randum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 10, 1991. This item was removed from the consentcalendar by Coun- cilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting. Community Resource Director Rooney responded to Council questions to explain that the Commission and staff fa- vored this event because it was scheduled in April, which is not normally a time of heavy beach use. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, objected to the event and to the beer company sponsorship of the event; Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, objected to the event and the sponsors; and, Craig Elledge - President of C.E. Sports, spoke in favor of the event and stated that the U.S. Olympic candidates would be participating in the event. (q) Proposed Action: To receive and file. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Edgerton. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Benz, Edgerton, and Essertier. Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to approve the request and contract for C. E. Sports and Entertainment to host a four man professional volleyball tournament, sponsored by Budweiser Beer, at the Hermosa Beach Pier Courts on April 25 and 26, 1992, with an event fee of $1,570 per day ($3,140 total) plus addi- tional costs for filming, staff, and police security and a two million dollar insurance requirement. Motion Essertier, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Wiemans and Mayor Midstokke. Recommendation to receive and file report on Prospect/ Aviation signs and review of left turn arrow at Prospect and Aviation. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Di- rector William Glickman dated January 2, 1992. City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 7667 Action: To approve the staff recommendation to take no action at this time on the modification of traffic sig- nals at Prospect Avenue and Aviation Boulevard. Recommendation to reject proposal for budgeted purchase of parking enforcement vehicles. Memorandum from Act- ing General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated De- cember 5, 1991. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: Mayor Midstokke directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the meeting of January 28, 1992. Recommendation to authorize staff to close the driveway entrance to the Greenbelt Parking Lot at Valley Drive and 11th Street and to post signs at the entrance to the lot north of 11th Place restricting parking by prohibit- ing certain vehicles. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated January 8, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: Mayor Midstokke directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the meeting of January 28, 1992. Recommendation to adopt resolution for plan checking and inspection fees for public improvements, and to approve the fees to be applied against funds on deposit and presently held by the City. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated December 19, 1991. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: Mayor Midstokke directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the meeting of January 28, 1992. Recommendation to approve the purchase of sixty-one "tamper -proof" Duncan meters, at a cost not to exceed $10,000, to replace a portion of the POM meters current- ly in use. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated December 12, 1991. City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 7668 This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: Mayor Midstokke directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the meeting of January 28, 1992. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1(a), (b), (d), (g), (1), and (p) were heard at this time, but are shown in order for clarity. Items 1(f), (o), (r), (s), (t), and (u) were continued to the meeting of January 28, 1992. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter of appreciation from the Easy Reader for the transportation provided by WAVE Dial -A -Ride for the "Mama Liz" Thanksgiving dinner. Recommendation: To receive and file. Action: To receive and file. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Wiemans. So ordered. (b) Letter from the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce received December 23, 1991 regarding business license penalties and temporary banners; and letter received December 31, 1991 from the Business Advocacy Committee of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce regarding busi- ness license penalties. Recommendation: To direct staff as it deems appropriate. This item was requested to be removed from consideration by the Chamber of Commerce. Action: To approve the request to withdraw the item. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Edgerton. So ordered. Mayor Midstokke directed staff to bring the question of the pen- alties assessed business licenses back to the Council as a future agenda item. City Attorney Vose stated that he was reviewing the matter. (c) Letter from Paul Hennessey, owner of Lighthouse Cafe, dated January 3, 1992, regarding installation of second City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 7669 door at rear of the Lighthouse. Recommendation: To con- tinue the requirement for double doors at rear. Sup- plemental letter from Paul Hennessey, dated January 10, 1992. Action: To continue this item to the meeting of January 28, 1992. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION AP- PROVAL OF VARIANCE AT 3104 INGLESIDE DRIVE. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 6, 1992. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing was opened at 8:25 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Simon Mitchell - 3104 Ingleside Drive, property owner, requested the variance due to the condi- tions of a substandard lot; an extremely narrow alley that did not allow proper turning radius; that having a garage that fronted on Ingleside was a condition that was enjoyed by the majori- ty of the property owners on Ingleside; the 17 foot setback was impossible on a 30 foot wide lot; and it was not a detriment to the neigh- borhood as his neighbors approved of the pro- posed remodel and new garage; Lorna Johnson - 514 31st Street, spoke in favor of the variance; felt it was impossible to park cars in the garages from the alley; Robert Johnson - 514 31st Street, spoke in favor of the variance and felt that it conformed with other properties in the area; Betty Steidinger - 457 31st Street, spoke in favor of granting the variance; felt that if the residence is not allowed to be enlarged, it would deteriorate as the house was too small for a family; that they would be providing garage space to take cars off the street; Greg Kelsey - 444 31st Street, spoke in favor of the variance as it would be in conformance with the neighborhood; he also felt that it was im- possible to have a 17 foot setback for a garage on a 30 foot wide lot; Tom Harmberger - formerly of 3104 Ingleside Drive, spoke in favor of the variance; said he had found it impossible to park in the garage from the alley; felt the City should provide some relief to owners of substandard lots that can- not meet the new requirements; City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 7670 Diana Weatherly - 3101 Valley Drive, spoke in favor of the variance; wanted to add her voice in support of the neighborhood approval of grant- ing the variance; Mike Sanders - 441 31st Street, spoke in favor of the variance, felt it was impossible to build to the City's requirements on these tiny lots and that the Council should change the need for a variance in these circumstances; Simon Mitchell - 3104 Ingleside Drive, property owner, stated that if the parking area that would have "grass-crete" was counted as open space, the property would have 294 square feet. The public hearing was closed at 8:46 P.M. Proposed Action: To deny the variance on review and reconsideration and approve staff recommendations Nos. 1 and 2. Motion Essertier, second Edgerton. The motion failed, dueto the dissenting votes of Benz, Edgerton, Wiemans, and Mayor Midstokke. Action: To grant the variance on review and recon- sideration, sustain the Planning Commission decision, adopt Resolution No. 92-5514, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFOR- NIA, TO SUSTAIN THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO GRANT A VARIANCE REQUEST TO ALLOW A REMODEL AND SECOND STORY ADDITION RESULTING IN A GARAGE SETBACK OF 3.5 FEET RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED 17 FEET AND A REDUCTION OF GROUND LEVEL OPEN SPACE TO ZERO RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED 200 SQUARE FEET AT 3104 INGLESIDE DRIVE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 140, SHAKESPEARE TRACT.", and direct staff to prepare a text amendment to allow expan- sion and remodeling under the circumstances found with regard to this case (substandard lots with garages on substandard alleys) as rapidly as possible. City Attor- ney Vose added the findings that irrespective of the cost, Southern California Edison does not want to relo- cate the power pole behind the owner's property and the relocation of the pole could result in a loss of street lighting for the neighborhood. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Wiemans. The motion car- ried unanimously. The meeting recessed at 9:10 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:27 P.M. 6. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION DENYING A CONDI- TIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR PAINTING IN CONJUNCTION WITH OPERATION OF EXISTING AUTO BODY REPAIR BUSINESS AT 501-555 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 6, 1992. City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 7671 Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing was opened at 9:46 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Paul Phillips - representing the appellant, spoke in favor of th appeal; asked that his client be allowed the new "state of the art" booth that would set a standard for other body shops to conform with; stated that much of the problem was with older, outmoded booths that allowed odors and contaminants to escape; stated that his client leased space on the property and was not responsible for the compliance of the prop- erty owner for other requirements of the Master C.U.P.; Scott Alden - 646 Sixth Street, spoke in opposition to the appeal; concerned with .the amount of work done outdoors and the waste material that is washed into the street; Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, Planning Commission, opposed to the appeal and concerned that staff has changed its recommendation; Maurice Beaudet - 1203 Eleventh Street, opposed to auto body shops in Hermosa; Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, feels that sensitivity to odors is a personal problem; Edie Webber - 1201 Eleventh Street, concerned about toxic wastes being flushed into the sewers and with City regulation of auto body shops; Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, concerned with the ability of the City to effectively regulate paint booths; and, Paul Phillips - representing the appellant, stated that being denied a paint booth posed an undue hardship on his client since he was not allowed to fully do the body work the City allowed other body shops to do. The public hearing was closed at 10:35 P.M. Action: To deny the appeal, sustain the Planning Com- mission decision, and adopt Resolution No. 92-5515, en- titled, HA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COM- MISSION DECISION TO DENY A MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR PAINTING IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OPERATION OF AN EXISTING AUTO BODY REPAIR SHOP, "EUROPEAN AUTO BODY", AND THE ADDITION OF A SPRAY BOOTH AT 501-555 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE EASTERLY 140 FEET OF LOT 24, AND LOT 25, BLOCK 78, SECOND ADDI- TION TO HERMOSA BEACH TRACT." Motion Essertier, second Mayor Midstokke. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Benz and Wiemans. City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 7672 7. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE TO REQUIRE RELOCATION IMPACT REPORT (RIR) FOR DISPLACEMENT OF MOBILEHOME RESI- DENTS AND ADOPTION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 6, 1992. Supplemental letter from G. Steven Andersen, At- torney at Law, 1334 Park View Avenue, Suite 100, Manhat- tan Beach, representing Curtis McCullum and Marineland Mobilhome Park, dated January 14, 1992. Letter submit- ted by Councilmember Benz dated January 14, 1992. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing was opened at 11:00 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, remembered the people from the mobilhome park presenting a petition to the Council requesting the Ordinance; Catherine Kenney - Marineland Mobilhome Park, Space 28, stated that it had become impossible for coach owners to sell as rents had increased 10% per year and the property owners had indicated they wanted to change the use of the property and sell it; felt the Ordinance was needed; Steve Andersen - Attorney for the property owners, stated that the property owners had no preference whether or not the Ordinance was approved; they saw it as clarification only; Helen Lekner - 24707 Winlock Drive, Torrance, a real estate broker, had sold several coaches previously but not recently as the disclosure form required by the property owners stated that the park was being considered for closure and sale; felt the Ordinance was unnecessary at this time; Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, felt the mobil - home park was necessary as low to moderate in- come housing for the General Plan;. felt the Ordinance was unnecessary and property owners should be told it will remain a mobilhome park; Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, felt the Council should be more concerned for the resi- dents of the mobilhome park; Merna Marshall - 360 33rd Place, suggested the mobilhome park was necessary and the City could purchase the mobilhome park property with funds from the Biltmore site sale; Elsa Frashetti - owner of coach in space 54, felt the Ordinance was necessary to protect the residents of the park; Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, thought the mobilhome park was protected in the General Plan, but more research should be done. City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 7673 The public hearing was closed at 11:32 P.M. Action: To receive and file. Motion Essertier, second Mayor Midstokke. The motion carried unanimously. The meeting recessed at 11:37 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 11:50 P.M. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. DISCUSSION REGARDING PROCEDURE FOR SALE OF BILTMORE SITE. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Steve Wis- niewski dated December 26, 1991. Planning Director Schubach responded to Council questions. City Attorney Vose reported that in determining the respective elements for the Biltmore site, the criteria was floor area, as determined by the Coastal Commission, and not lot size. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, suggested that the Council consider an appraisal as a first step; that the ballot measure set a maxi- mum of seven residential lots but did not re- quire the development of all seven as that would make the lot size below the minimum 4,000 square feet now required by the City for development; and that Council set a minimum bid in order to raise the $7,000,000 to $8,000,000 that had been promised the voters in the ballot arguments; Betty Ryan - 588 20th Street, stated that the Council needed a licensed appraiser to give an appraisal of the land before they went to bid for a broker; Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, questioned if the land would be sold "as is" or if the City would finance the clean up of the swimming pool and other debris in order for the land to be buildable; Merna Marshall - 360 33rd Place, opposed to the sale of the land on a "piecemeal" basis and asked the City to conform to the standards re- quired of others; submitted information dated January 14, 1992; John Coleman - 1919 Hillcrest Drive, realtor, sug- gested that the Council might wish to look at drawings he had done of possible subdivisions several years ago when the "Biltmore Blue Rib- bon" committee had studied the matter; also suggested that the Council divide the property City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 7674 into commercial and residential lots as there were few developers who dealt with both types of construction and that the residential lots be sold separately; Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, asked the Council to consider that a soil engineer would be required to certify that the land was fit for construction before the property could be sold, which could cost the City $20,000 —to- reme t ae -; that the property did not have to conform to the 4,000 square foot lot requirement as this property had been subdi- vided previously; that a lot line adjustment required a public hearing before the Planning Commission, that could be appealed; and, that "floor area" included parking. City Attorney Vose responded that the commercial "floor area" of 30% did not include parking, in the Coastal Commission direction; John Coleman - 1919 Hillcrest Drive, felt the City needed an appraisal by a licensed appraiser but if the number of lots were decreased to make 4,000 square foot lots, the City could lose as much as 15% to 20% of the sale revenue (ap- proximately $1,000,000); Patricia Hill - 841 Manhattan Avenue, questioned if the City had made the request for the material prepared by Mr. Coleman as she thought it had been made by a member of an ad hoc citizen's committee; Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, submitted information dated January 14, 1992; opposed to the sale of the Biltmore site; requested a public hearing on the sale and on information contained in ballot propositions G and H; asked the City Attorney, also the District Attorney and the Attorney General, for an investigation into alleged improprieties in the election of November 5, 1991; and, Dave Reimer 802 Monterey Blvd., suggested the City advertise in the Los Angeles Times for qualified people or developers to deal with the complexities of the proposals. Proposed Action: To approve the staff recommendation No. 1: to use a broker to handle the sale with the selection being conducted as a sealed bid process from qualified brokers. Motion Mayor Midstokke. The motion failed due to the lack of a second. Action: To suspend the formal rules and use a more casual procedure. Motion Essertier, second Edgerton. So ordered due to the lack of objection of the Council. City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 7675 Final Action: To direct staff to hire a licensed MAI appraiser to appraise the commercial portion of the property; and, appraise the residential portion as originally subdivided into seven (7) lots and also as it would be divided using current standards (4,000 square foot lots.) Councilmember Benz requested the motion be amended to ensure that staff use the proper bid pro- cedure to obtain the appraiser. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Edgerton. The motion carried unanimously. 9. REQUEST BY HERMOSA BEACH SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF AB 325 (TO ALLOW HERMOSA BEACH SCHOOL DIS- TRICT TO REMAIN AN INDEPENDENT KINDERGARTEN THROUGH 8TH GRADE DISTRICT IN EVENT OF SPLIT UNIFICATION IN MANHAT- TAN BEACH AND REDONDO BEACH.) Letter dated December 23, 1991 from Hermosa Beach School District Superintendent Elaine Gourley. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, reminded the Council that previous policy had been to ap- prove letters in support of State legislative items that affected Hermosa Beach rather than adopting Resolutions, both as a matter of cost and as legislators' indicated preference; and, Mary Lou Weiss - 2506 Ardmore Avenue, Hermosa Beach School Board Member, responded to Council ques- tions to ensure that there would be no cost involved with the Assembly Bill and there would be a vote on the issue of proposed unification. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-5513, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF ASSEMBLY BILL 325." Motion Essertier, second Edgerton. So ordered. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER. Interim City Manager Wisniewski reported that there would be a closed session on Saturday, January 18, 1992 for the purpose of conducting City Manager applicant interviews. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Appointment of members to Cable Advisory Board. Memo- randum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated January 7, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation and direct the City Clerk to re -advertise for applicants, changing the time for the meetings to 7:00 P.M. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Edgerton. So ordered. City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 7676 (b) Setting of date for joint meeting of City Council, Chamber of Commerce and Planning Commission. Action: Mayor Midstokke directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the meeting of January 28, 1992. 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - None CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council at this time was: Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, objected to letters to the editor printed in the Easy Reader. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, January 15, 1992, at the hour of 1:25 A.M. to the Special Meeting to be held on Saturday, January 18, 1992 at the hour of 9:30 A.M. for the purpose of conducting City Manager applicant interviews. 017 Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 01-14-92 Page 7677 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Saturday, January 18, 1992, at the hour of 9:30 A.M. ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Wiemans, Essertier, Mayor Midstokke Absent: None CLOSED SESSION - The purpose of the Special Meeting was to retire to closed session at 9:32 A.M. to interview applicants for the position of City Manager. The session recessed at 12:08 P.M. for lunch. The session reconvened at 1:30 P.M. The closed session was recessed at 5:22 P.M. to the Special Meeting. ADJOURNMENT - The Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Saturday, January 18, 1992, at the hour of 5:25 P.M. to a Special Meeting to be held on Saturday, January 25, 1992, at the hour of 9:30 A.M. for the pur- pose of interviewing additional applicants for the position of City Manager ft/D1 -tont -L olct LS' eputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 01-18-92 Page 7678 E -6 -AR )1k) 6- 1' Til l 44 • (PtRL v /►V^, u 7a's� -ay)? #Q" (J L.0,vorefic- 7E/ �e� c� 90�� c% J-fb-�1/n o S / l-.2 el --r7 Coum b ,3 S �� ^/ yogi Cir o f //bp oS1 12.67fi N P PO AR ..tolNb nPfgo pc o w", t 765 7675�qU (YST �-7 N po‘r- m i NU TVS T/1 T -rfI6 1-/V- 9D- waRs b yu ion°tic' 1)j -rD 0Hr 6 R r)-1 U 6-0Ri'C IF7 `$0,000. my gb- bQekic6 of , SotL- aosT -of .77) CoS7 WAS j 6/N fr . S/NeblgC27/ N of= oNcy cos/ / 19 ) r No X 40» ,S) ef&ilvieitv-TA 7b -arm (fivAdYgrs) gE--6N/to G- I TVY1 f - 14• (AIP%ooAL /^'uros -rte' J)owt7fth 1,6Noar 1”.1 7z_groLfter- H6-f1ry1 o S A gebli 019 ?ogs—V erT,CoUN 0(1118ctih rh /9 %g', C /7, of /I6-Rm osP S IN& fPORo V ft, or ,'/,W7' . pb v&sT X4-7— b pocr- V` � you R6'�►?0�� -rtt 6 I -1 9�- m'NU�s 17-17137-i of b (A)016_S )1 ya Iib ovr r ,b6-6R/S fP6,6'1R)NG Hr�� r o,0v0 m y g ef-bepiei of So/(.S aos T �f `)o Cosmo WAS G/N Erb , S/NebV62/ aN (I 70 eoS ibis. 7q (p9/,Vf7) I 4.4 ior V L • w :, fay CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0001 .TIME_113' ,54 FOR_Q1/16/92 DATE_01/16/92__, PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE_INVC PROJ_# AC_CQUNI_DESCRIPTION AMOUNT_UNENC__ DATE EXP____ N HERMOSA REACH_EA_YROLL_AQQOUNT 00243 _0.01-202=00.0072030__40.461 $297,522_58_ • _ __.___.__..__.___. __._. 39647 PAYROLL/JAN 1-15, 1992 01/15/92 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $0.00 01/16/92 it#a►_._VENDOR=IOTAL_******i+i3**** *****AkA*. AAAAA t *A***A##A*** ►*: _***#iE*****t#*# ita►atu# $297 522 58 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 0Q1-400-1213-4180_..__00557 $39,417_29 RETIREMENT ADV/DEC 91 01/09/92 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT **_._VENDOfi_TOTAL******************************************************** *********** $39.017 79 H U. S`_WFSIUBLIC_SAEE_TYLGROUP 03767 001-_400-21D1-4316, QOR15 $1,500 00 TUITION/D. LOUGHIN TR397 01/09/92 POLICE /TRAINING 39645 _ $0.00 01/16/92 TR397 00397_ $0.00 ##*__vENDOR—TOTAL_**********************#AA_******AA*AitA R**.-$tit*_****A*******A#AAA*AAA*** 1.1..500 00 3' 33 J 6 ) w„ O 14 u IL ,9 39644___H 01/16/92 26 27 H USW/BSG/NUG 03249 001-4Q0-21Q1-4316—_Df'R14 $500._00 TR39'' _00395 19643—__ RF_G/LOUGHIN/ELLEDGE TR395 01/09/92 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 01/16/92 *L _VENQfR TOTAL_ ********** # ►_AA** t#H it t **** *# **** .**_*..±t*****.***AA** ****** -$5QQ 00 20 11 3l. 33 34 35 H STFYE*WISNIE 9KI 0415A 170-4001103=4327 —00041 -$504000 00 04101 39646___ SP INVESTIGATION FUNDS . . 01/15/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /UNCLASSIFIED $0.00 01/16/92 3*** VENDORSOTAL * Lith*# t. �► * t A iii itiii# t*A.*******st**A##itxit. itt.it3tit** X50."000 00 ,) TI 42 .,, 4n 4�. *** PAY CODE TOTAL**IL***at**at********3t*it**at***at*it*at*st**$tat****aa * AkA**x itiOr*itit#** $388._532_&7 R AMFR IC.AN FAGS_ 0311# 145-400=34094201___00009 $295_00 BUS/SENIOR EXCURSION 01/15/92 REC TRANSPTN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL_ **at******** *******IL***IL*t**fir* *### $kit* *****A*3ti►_***.********ILIA*# $295_00 ab 47 MI m, 50 41 .12 50 51 03525 39651._._.... $0.00 01/16/92 R AMERICAN_, STYLE_EOODR00857 001_=400=21014306 01 110 $31 50 , A787_00015______39652_ PRISONER MEALS/JAN 92 6787 01/15/92 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE *** VFNDOR TOTAL ******it****A0***********+Lich************************ A0********* A** x'11 50 $0.00 01/16/92 R Ar_L AS_CARPEI— 04401 001=400=4204=4302_02219 $450_00_ —11577 03731___—.39653 - CARPET/COMM CTR ROOM 8 11577 01/06/91 BLDG. MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $450.00 01/16/92 55 56 5, 0: J J J 'u J 1 J .J J )4 •r )F • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:33:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/16/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # INV/REF PAGE 0002 DATE Q1/16/_92.h PO # UNENC • CHK # In I9 20 ..:z 23 '4 2! 20 _c 31 34 35 17 ::n 39 11 4z 43 4 t .43 5J 7 4 5 V J .,9 • 0 0 --" *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************-x*****************iiia********** $450.00 R AUTOMATED FILING SYSTEMS, INC. 03535 001-400-2101-4305_Q1668 $724 45 9221.03175.______39654 ri .._ FOLDERS/POLICE RECORDS 9221 12/06/91 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $710.12 01/16/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $724.95 k R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES 02076 001-300-0000-3859 00067 "' l, $1 356.69 02780 __39655 _. BAL REFUSE LIENS/FY90-91 01/15/92 /REFUSE LIEN FEE $0.00 01/16/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 31,356.69 .' GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-1101-4305 00411 $1 46 03827_.__.__39656__ REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 1-13 01/13/92 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/16/92 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-1203-4305__00334 $5,26_ 03827 39656...._ REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 1-13 01/13/92 PERSONNEL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/16/92 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-2101-4305 01669 $58_24___ 03827 39656_.__ REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 1-13 01/13/92 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/16/92 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-2101-4314_00817 $24.00 0382_'_ 39656 1" 13 " _ REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 1-13 01/13/92 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 01/16/92 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREAS_JRE-R 0701Q 091=40010.1-4305 ., '` QQ092_ $24.94 03827__ 39656.._... REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 1-13 01/13/92 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/16/92 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4201-4305 00/38 $2.37 3' .1B 3' 03827 39646 REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 1-13 01/13/92 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/16/92 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001=4_00_74202-4305 00659 $51 BO 0382739656___ 4, 4., REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 1-13 01/13/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/16/92 , R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4202-4316 4' 44 00222 34.71 03827 3456_..._... REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 1-13 01/13/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING $0.00 01/16/92 , R GARY -113R ]REASURER 02016 001_-400=4202-431600221 $38-40 03827 39656 .17 . _ REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 1-13 01/13/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING $0.00 01/16/92 , R GARY*RRUISCH, CI_TYJ$EL$URER 02016 001 -40D -48Q1-4305 01024 $8.Q0 ' 4'' 51 03827 _34656_ REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 1-13 01/13/92 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/16/92 , -c ',3 1 In I9 20 ..:z 23 '4 2! 20 _c 31 34 35 17 ::n 39 11 4z 43 4 t .43 5J 7 4 5 V J .,9 • 0 0 v CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA34O DEMAND LIST TIL1F 11:33 _4 EOR 01L16/92 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DESCRIP_T.IQN DATE INVC PRO./ # ACCDUNL_DESCR1P_TION_ R GARY*REUTSCH, CITY TREASURER Q REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 1-13 GARY*BRUTSCH,_CITY._TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 1-13 R GAR/1BRUISCLLY__TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 1-13 2016 001-400-6101-430 01/13/92 PARKS 02016 01/13/92 PAGE 0003 DATE_01/16/92 IS INV/REF PO # CHK # 3_A -MOUNT_JNENC _ DATE EXP___. 9 01159 __4? 71 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 110=400-3302-4305 008A7 PARKING ENF 02016___._160-400=31Q2-4309,_ 00665 01/13/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN $2 29 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $25_00_ /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *At* VENDOR_IDTAL 1 ##1x ######## 1 $1.*+ Mit-** ##############*###*##*##+t ######.***#### $2R8 90 R BUILDING_NEWS, 1NC PUBLICATIONS/PUB WORKS 7 03827____39656.__ a $0.00 01/16/92,0 II • 1z 1; lib 03827.----39656--- $0.00 3827.-_-39656--- $0.00 01/16/92 03827_.___-39656 _. $0.00 01/16/92 00411 001--400-4202-4305-0065R $107_73 -81010607___03646 10607 01/06/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $213.14 *** VENDOR_IQ_TAL ##A## '# ##.iM***#*#### ###•_ir##*#### Hk#lr t.*** t#_*u # _5L*_ IE*_##* jril**3L** $10701 •.'1 J3 J4 v .0 P7 ,162 R V Ill '0 J3 .y -29657 -__ 01/16/92 j CA_LANDSCAEE MAINTENANCE, TNC 00599 0401=400=3.101r4201 0C)099 $34._800_00 X470112-00044 396'8 12/31/91 MEDIANS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/16/92 MEDIAN MAINT/DEC 91 70112 *** VENDOR TOTAL**************#***********tt#*Ait## *.***_******3r****•n**. ** $32-800.O0 AFE_5Q'S ,I NI 04481_ 00.1=210-0000-2110_04671 01/13/92 $250 00___ 2298a 03823 TEMPORARY BANNER REFUND 22988 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 _#** VENDO.R TOIALA****##i **** lt, ti*it****A***#***_***.'x*#******.*# ***A*##** $250 00 R CALIFORNIA_BEACH- ..39659_....._ 01/16/92 04482 001=210=0000=2110 04673 $250 00- 28406_.03826_ TEMPORARY BANNER REFUND 28406 01/13/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 _ * _VENDOR IQIN **. ***/** tit#******+.•n ***A* '*** �t#**.*#jr***##****�►*******.** *A****#**_ $250 00 R LER.TIEIED OFFICE-EQULP_MENT 00389 001-400=2101=4305_01667 $47_54 12/23/91 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES MISC. CHARGES/DEC 91 4676 39660__ 01/16/92 •v 27 .J '0 Jy 31 J ,J 13 34 35 J 37 V .7; 42 41 O 41 41, *** VENDOR_TOTAL_****'*#.**************_t***************#*.*****************,ti**********#* $47_-94 _CINTAS_CORPORATION 00133 00-1-400-4202-4187_- 001R7 $611__1.5 UNIFORM RENTAL/DEC 91 4676 0121? 39661_.__ $0.00 01/16/92 12/31/91 PUB WKS ADMIN /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 00002______39662___ $0.00 01/16/92 67 70 !1 14 75 5.0 • • FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 11:33:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENTAL/DEC 91 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR Q1L16/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # 6GCOUNLAESCRIPTION__ PAGE 0004 DATE01L 16/92. INV/REF PO # CHK # ______.__AMOUNT UNENC _ DATE .EXP ._.._ 00153 110-400-3302-4187 00319 $52.50 12/31/91 PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************•*************************************************** COAST IRRIGATION CO. DISCOUNT OFFERED 00354 001-202-0000-2021 00133 R COAST IRRIGATION CO. DISCOUNT TAKEN 28629 01/08/92 00354 001-202-0000-2022 28629 01/08/92 R COAST IRRIGATION CO. SPRINKLER REP/VALLEY PRK 28629 00354 001-400-6101-4309 $663 65 $0. 83 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 00133 $0. 83C R /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 01158 $40.84 01/08/92 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00002 39662. ._. e $0.00 01/16/92 11 12 13 1< IS _28629 28629 __03638 ___ __ 39663 _ $0.00 01/16/92 25629 _03638__ 396631; 40.00 01/16/92 z 13 I. 28624__ _O3638.. __—_ 39663 ._ $41. 67 01/16/92k I,] *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *40.84 27 R COLLIN CREEK TRAVEL AIRFARE/V. ELLEDGE 04475 001-400-2101-4316 Q0816 $6460 61943 12/06/91 POLICE /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *64-60 R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE & 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00174 $237,_05 12/31/91 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT SHELTER COSTS/DEC 91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $237.05 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 02840 001-400-1208-4201 00837 COPIER MAINT/DEC 91 29808 01/05/92 GEN APPROP EAST, AN KODAK COMPANY 92840 00109-12Q8-4201__00838 COPIQR 4 METER USE/NOV 91 29808 01/05/92 GEN APPROP *** VENDOR TOTAL 61943 0034_6 39664__ $0.00 01/16/92 3! 3z 11 3.1 00014 39665.___ $0.00 01/16/92 n, $283.00 006M29806 0122.5 39666_ _ /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/16/92 ,; 4351.28____._ 006M29808 01225 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00 ****************************************************************#*** 463428 39666 01/16/92 R _FASY READER 00181 109=400-3301-4305._0003Q—__. $550. 00 AD/VPD COMMISSION 1135 12/31/91 VEH PKG DIST /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1135_03349 39667._ . 40.00 01/16/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4a5Q_00 R EXF_CU11VE—SUITESERV_LCES INC. 01294 001-400=42024201 00347 $1,460 00 12/31/91 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT JANITOR SERV/DEC 91 00039_..__.39668 40.00 01/16/92 ]c ]) !4 J V • J J JJ r • • � 1r Its tow CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST T_IME_1 L.3354 FOR Q1/16L92 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DESCR.IP_IION DATE INVC PROS 1 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTTON *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************?r.******** ******* *** ****** R F MORTON EITT HELMETS/REQ BY LAW 1/92 18906 PAGE 0005 DATE._01116/92~__ 1\ 3 ..i' 4 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT_UNENC __.___ DATE_.EXP__. $I�_46QG0_ 00210 110-400-1102-4187___0031R $1,_453_26 _ 12/21/91 PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** YFNT?OR TOTAL***********************************************************A*** fir*ff# -3-12, – R GASB_.ORDERGFPARTMENT 00669 O01=400-17024316-10.401 $2Q_00 PUBLICATIONS/FINANCE G0A01 01/15/92 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING ***_tENDOR TOTAL ***************************#•pin•**A *_ir9t****. **********?t***et*3tjt_it**** t* $20_0Q 24 *** z7 3, .`. r y 3,s 46 7 GENERAL.DIS000NTS TIME CLOCK RIBBONS 3608 01049 110-400-3302-4305 0086A $51 64 12/11/91 —18906 _ 03340 --..---. 39669 ---- $1,454.25 01/16/92 OQA01-02775 39670 $0.00 01/16/92 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES VENDOFi_IOjAI******************************•»*********.****.* _****A*..+ ****_M. ******* R W M *GLICKMAN_&_ASSOOIATES INTERIM PUB WKS DIR/DEC W`M GLICKMAN_&_.ASSOCIASF4 INTERIM PUB WKS DIR/DEC W M *GLICKMAN_&__ASSOCIATES INTERIM PUB WKS DIR/DF_C R l,l—M A,GLICKMAN_&_ASSOC_IA,TFS INTERIM PUB WKS DIR/DEC R W M *GLICKMAN & ASSOCIATES INTERIM PUB WKS DIR/DEC L,(_M *GLICKMAN_ &_ASSOCIATES INTERIM PUB WKS DIR/DEC 1608 03345 $0. 00 _39671__ 01/16/92 39671----- 01/16/92 $91__64 04288_____001=400=3103-4201 00376 $731 50 -.._ 12/30/91 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 0428R 001-400-3.104-4201-0010? $1,_463.00 12/30/91 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 04288 _001_,400-4202-4201 0034A $2.-194.50---- -------_.__ 12/30/91 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 04288 001-400-4204-4201-00499 12/30/91 BLDG MAINT $731 50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 04288---001-400-4205-4201- 00007 $731.50 12/30/91 EQUIP SERVICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 04288 160-400-3102-4201^0003 1.463..00 12/30/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ***__VENDOR—TIITAI.**.****.*3r*.***.****.**•*.********.*.*****.*.******"****************.*A***•*****ac* $7.-315 00 4 51 GTE_OAL.IFORNIA.-1NCORPDRATEA 00019 001=400=1206-4304_00434 $64.90 01/15/92 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE TELE CHARGES/JAN 92 00071 $0.00 6 7 n IC 'I 12 11 14 113 .10 21 23 2,11 a 27 .1. zn 3.J 31 39672 -- 01/16/92 0007.1.. 39672.. - .. $0.00 01/16/92 J , 00071-- -39672 $0.00 01/16/92 00071 __39672._ ._ $0.00 01/1.6/92 61 .J' 00071 39672 $0.00 01/16/92 00071 19672._. _ $0.00 01/16/92 00130_ '19673._- $0. 00' 01/16/92 r •6 s7 551 G3 G, GG 57 1.11 70 71 7J rn rs to J FINANCE—SFA340 TIME_ 11:33:54 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION b VND # DATE INVC GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/JAN 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/16/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ # PAGE 0006 ,J PATE__01116492_� TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNTUNENC_.•__DATE EXP___ 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00952 $88.90 01/15/92 POLICE /TELEPHONE 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00541 547.83 TELE CHARGES/JAN 92 01/15/92 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** JAN*HALLGREN ROSE BOWL TRIP REFUND $201.63 00130 39673 *0.00 01/16/92 O 00130_ 29'673 *0.00 01/16/92 04478 001-400-4601-4201 01179 *70.00 26905 03734 26905 01/06/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R *70.00 ro 39674 ,o 01/16/92 '' '3 ➢, 30 R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 001-400-2101-4311 01323 *122.00 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 91 HERMOSA CAR WASH 1398 12/31/91 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00065 001-400-2401-4311 00257 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 91 1398 R HERMOSA CAR WASH R 12/31/91 1398 01236 __ 39675 k $0.00 01/16/92 *5 00 1398 91236 ANIMAL CONTROL /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00065 001=00-4201-4311 00268 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 91 1398 12/31/91 HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 91 1398 R HERMOSA_CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES/DEC 91 HERMOSA CAR WASH .30 .12 12/31/91 BUILDING 39675 *0.00 01/16/92 ,5 36 .v $8 00 1398 01236_. 39675. /AUTO MAINTENANCE 001-400-4202-4311 00199 $5 00 PUB WKS ADMIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00065 I05-400-2601-4311 _.. 00245 $4.00 1396 12/31/91 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE MISC. CHARGES/DEC 91 1398 00065 12/31/91 $0.00 01/16/92 1318 01236 39675._._ ^" $0.00 01/16/92 1398_01236_____39675 .. $0.00 01/16/92 170-400-2103-4311. 00024 $12,_00__ 1328 01236 SPEC INVESTGTNS /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 396,75 01/16/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $156 00 HERMOSA NAIL CO. 13 .16 50 TEMPORARY BANNER REFUND 24218 031.24 0D1 -210=Q000-2110 04670 $250 00 24218L_Q3822 01/13/92 39676 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00 01/16/92 *** VENDOR_TOTAL******************************************************************** $250 00 nti 51 INDEE.ENDEt4T CITIES RISK 4148.4 705-400-1209-420.1_ 3Q0235 $15,18 00 03Q68__396Z2__._�`_^ 01/02/92 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 01/16/92 ;;. LIABILITY PREMIUM ADJ •c 1 r.+ 7' 72 7.1 J J 4!- O ..r rt Y 23 FINANCE-SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST LIME 11:33'54_ M1_01/16/92 PAY VENDOR NAME PAGE . 0007 ..r DATE_01/16/92.__ VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE—IN_VC P�iO5J_J ACCOUNLDESCRI2LION AMOUNT UNENC.__DATE .EXP _._ R INDEPENDENT CITIES�ISK 01484_ _705=4:00 1210--4201 60685 ADD'L AUTO PREMIUM/FY 92 01/03/92 AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 ***___VENDOR TOTAL ******************it 3t********it iEil**3t#.it it**3*#.#**Aitiitjt3E#. # itiittr .$16._846 00 INTERNATIQNAL_CONE__OF BUILDIN SEMINAR REG/R. BILLING 98840 G 00667 00140Q42014316.._00278._.$280_____ 12/30/91 BUILDING /TRAINING R INTERNATIONAL_CONF.OF BUILDING SEMINAR REG/C. WILLIAMS 98835 00667 001_-400=4201-4316 00279 $190.00 12/30/91 BUILDING /TRAINING 39677.._.__ 01/16/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL *********3t*3titit it # #. #tt#t/t�rjt# Air***$iritifitititit****3tif#itff 3tititit***. rit*.*it# $475_00 E98840.__02260-- 39678..... $285.00 01/16/92 E98835._ 02262 $190.00 39678 _ _ 01/16/92 R_ LANDSCAPE WEST._ INC_04303--_001-400-6101r-4201____00256 $7,685 50- _—__._.___ 6551.--.00073. PARRS MAINT/DF_C 91 6551 12/31/91 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***itit***********;t3Fjtkkit 4iifitit3t#if_it$#_ffitit***$_*iY3k***dt#3t3t****3H1 **** *** !$7._685_.Dn •r .09 r v 15 i' l. R LEARNFD 1 UMBER 00167_ 001-_400-4204-4309--02214 $141 81 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 91 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC. CHARGES/DEC 91 _9679- 01/16/92 12/31/91 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01238 . --39680 --- $0.00 01/16/92 00167 061=400=4205-4309_ _00617 $59.95-_ 01238_ _29680_.__ 12/31/91 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/16/92 ***__VENDOR TOTAL********il**n**,311111fiA*.it*.it.**st*31*********************************_** t3Ht*** $201_...76 SI R l MEDIEVAL_ TIMES_. DINNER & 04312__._001-460-466.1-4261.____61178 $778 O5 03524 __.39661..... COMM RES SR EXCURSION 01/15/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $778.05 01/1,6/92 **ft VENDOR_170TAL**3t ******.********A***.*.****.***.**Htit**********.********it**A********* $778_05 3 4 ,2 13 14 ..r Cr 15 V 11, 19 z1 26 27 10 31 s4 35 35 1.3 51 ►aERRIMAC_PETROLEUM.-INC 03080 001-141_-0000-1401 001,45 $3,209_02 _920019-03649____39682 _._ UNLEADED GAS/CITY YARD 20019 01/09/92 /GASOLINE INVENTORY $0.00 01/16/92 '.,, *** VENDOR__TOTAL_*************.*******.******************************************.****** $3.-209-0? R Tf7M*MDBERI Y ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 04479 001-216=0000-p11n (4666 $50_00 —25335__ Q380Q 3"/683 28335 01/13/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 01/16/92 :l 53 .1 55 J 51 11 11 11 14 15 13/ .40 a, FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:33:54 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/16/92 PAGE 0008 DATE 0j16/92 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # , DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # . ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ___,< 6 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************•***•p******************************************** $50. GO i I ,ut NUGGET CONSTRUCTION 04476 001-210-000-2110 04667 _$40Q 03830_._ 39684__-02 _OQ -25954 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 25954 01/13/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 01/16/92 �, !'" *** VENDOR TOTAL ************air*********•********************•*****•x******************* $400.00 16 to R NUMERO UNO 04480 001-210-0000-2110 04669 $250. 00 22358 03828 39685 '° TEMPORARY BANNER REFUND 22358 01/13/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 01/16/92 21 � 1,,I *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $250.._00 •' __ 'I / J6 4"j_ R OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 00093 001-400-2101-4311 01322 $116.3-4_ 12620_00152 39686.___J9 MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 12620 01/07/92 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/16/92 1" *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $116 24 37 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE 00321 001-4QQ=2101-4304 00953 $2 07 00036._. 74 15 'S _R__396B7_.._ COMPUTER HOOKUP/JAN 92 01/01/92 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 01/16/92 ,0 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,9Z „ 4, 43 ' R RICHARD*PAPILLON 03711 00.1=21.0=G000-2110 04672 $250.00_ 03825._ 39688.-.' _22416 TEMPORARY BANNER REFUND 22416 01/13/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 01/16/92 ,;; 44] *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,50.00 , .,,, 35 50 PERSONAL SUPPORT COMPUTERS 03529 QQ1_-409_2101-4305 01666_ $445.22_______.__WLAW102352 39689 _.03185. MAC COMPUTER REP/POLICE 02352 12/19/91 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $445.22 01/16/92 ' *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $445.22 • M A 59 R PHOENIX_GROUP 02530 11Q-400-3302-4201_00325 $2,_167.04__._.______-.5695-00—__—_ 39690... "' 16 OUT-OF-STATE CITES/DEC91 95-00 12/31/91 PARKING ENF /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/16/92 ' 4, f1 49. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2.167-04 ''' 40 5 66 .,' R PORTERS ALIGNMENT Ls_BBAKE.._SERV Q3'i1Q Q01-400-2101-431.1 01321 $85._50.._.. 556L552L558_03165. 39691._._ ALIGN POLICE UNITS 7/558 01/02/92 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $85.50 01/16/92 ,, 4 1] ,4 ,6 '5! >9 +w. r r ti r OF J ILO v 0 • J Y • 0 0 9 ` 11 *** VENDO3 TOTAL***************************************************#*********.11 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA34O DEMAND LIST TIME 11334 FORS?1L16/92 PAY VENDOR NAME DE�.�CRIP_"CI ON J PAGE 0009 DATE_.01 /16/.92_ VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # 3 DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNLDESCRIPTI0N AMOUNT_UNENC �DATE_EXP._. *** VFNDOR TOTAI ******************? ********************* ►*' ***** r'n******** ********* 485-5Q 411. FIT11 13 `!.m y .:1 /12 .13 13 0 _POSTAGE_ON CAIL 04091 001-400=1.208-4305 01017 $2,007 50 9201674--08060------39692--- POSTAGE METER RESET 01674 12/31/91 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/16/92 $22_007_5()____ __R 2..007_5Q_— R PROE__COMMUNLCATI0N9 TNGTAIIERS 02526 170-400-21Q3-4311-00023 $85_00 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 91 701 12/31/91 SPEC INVESTGTNS /AUTO MAINTENANCE ***VENDOR_TQTAL***************************************'x*************************** ____$85 00 R RADIO_SHACK 01429 00.1=400-4204-4309 —02213 $32. 42 701_01257 39693— $0.00 01/16/92 MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 75028 01/07/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS * * * VENDOR TOTAL*********************************n'******►*********#***********Ak**i* R SOUIFLBAY-NOIICINC AND 03887 MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 ER01A 01/15/92 001-400-101-4201 04129 PLANNING _$32.42 75028_._00158 4 6 r J 8 10 O 12 13 14 1' 41111 I5 19 1 24 26 2) 29694._ 2 $0.00 01/16/92 h 31 34 $230 00 92HERQIA-00164 ____9695.-_-_35 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/16/92 ;`, *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************»*****'q*****. **3r#3t ***#*#*** R SOUTHERN_ CALIFORNIA ED.ISON CO ELECTRIC BILLS/DEC 91 R SOUIHERN_CALIEORNIA DIS0N (' ELECTRIC BILLS/DEC 91 $230 00 001 �9 X01--400-2101-4303__00062 $23_18 12/30/91 POLICE /UTILITIES n 00159 001_ -400 -31Q1 -43Q3 —00177 $148_56 12/30/91 MEDIANS /UTILITIES R_ SOUTHERN_CALIEORNIA._FfTSON-00 ELECTRIC BILLS/DEC 91 OUTHERN CALIEORNIA_FDTSON41. ELECTRIC BILLS/DEC 91 R _SOUTHERN..CALIFORNIA_EDISON-CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/DEC 91 00159_____001-400=31044303 0009P $579 04 12/30/91 TRAFFIC SAFETY /UTILITIES 00159______001=400=4204=4303 00509 $6,753_89 42 43 01266 39696 __ _ $0.00 01/16/92 01266. _ .39696_ _. $0.00 01/16/92 01266 -.—_ 39696. .-. $0.00 01/16/92 Cn 01266 99696__ 12/30/91 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES $0.00 01/16/92 .., 00159____-001-400-6101-4303 0039G $927 99 01266 39696---- 12/30/91 PARKS /UTILITIES $0.00 01/16/92 011 1 40159 105-40n-2An L-4303—op2P5 $522_40 01266_ 34696 12/30/91 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES $0.00 01/16/92 , J J • • J SOUSHERN_GALIEORNIA__.ED_LSON rn ELECTRIC BILLS/DEC 91 54 r.1 n r • 13/ • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 11:33:54 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0010 FOR 01/16/92 DALE 01!16/._92^ PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT_..UNENC __ DATE EXP .. _... R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00178 $63.77 01266 ELECTRIC BILLS/DEC 91 12/30/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN /UTILITIES $0.00 01/16/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************* $9.025 83 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP 00146 001-400-4601-4305 01023 $41.31 1011220-61 00033_ 39697 12/31/91 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/16/92 WATER COOLER RENT/DEC 91 20-61 *** VENDOR TOTAL+**air*?r*+r***:******************************************************* $41.31 R __ ROCHELLE*STOCKWELL 04477 1.10-300_0000-3302 43564 $20. 00�7Q211i02778______39698 .. CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 02117 01/13/92 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 01/16/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20-00 R STUDIO GRAPHICS 01409 001-400-4601-4302 0Q1.7.5 $625.40 TYPESET SPRING REC FLYER 01/09/92 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING 0357L__39699._. $625.00 01/16/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *625-00 6 c 11 13 14 IS 11 26 27 711 711 34 35 35 R CITY OF*TORRANCE 00841 001-400-2101-4251 00419 4*4 50 104938410.5979 00068_ 397.00___°" PRISONER ID CHGS/NOV-DEC 05079 12/31/91 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 01/16/92 4? 43 R CITY OF*TORRANCE 00841 —1.11:_5-_.4_0S)=33_402-4201___00,168 $669..50_____ 1050_9.0_01957 .39700 _ _. °' CITY-SHARE/MAX/3RD GTR 05090 01/09/92 COMMUTER BUS /CONTRACT SERVICES $0.00 01/16/92 .1 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $62.4 00 S1 TRAFFIC CONTROL. _5EV$_ASSN 01362_____001m400=31.04-4315 00027 $20_40 03655__ 39701_____'''_ ANNUAL DUES/OLSON 01/09/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 01/16/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.00 n 69 *** PAyLCODE_T0TAL *********************writ#*�►****#***4i#1ti*iF*** # *#*fit#***#*#********** $6&A92.72 *** TOTAL WARBBNTS****************************************************************** $+45.._032._59 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY 6� THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGES / TOIQINCLUSIVE, OF.THC WARRANT REGISTER FOR //6A4 ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE " TO TTHBUDGET..---. BY • FINA CER DATE ///6/7.� y J -J 410, .40 J J J V aro • F 1 N.\NCE--SFAa4O TIME= 15:25:31 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/23/92 ' PAGE 0001 DATE 01/23/92 2' V V I PAY VENOOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER .TRN # AMOUNT. INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 1� 2 4 5 6 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 00935 001-400-2101-4309 00492 $714.28 40571 02481 39705 5 6 7 a 7 e RADIO REPAIR/POLICE 40571 09/19/91 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $409.79 01/23/92 OR TOTAL ****************•qtr*****sr•a*************ar************* *********** *** $714.28 9 10 111 2 to 11 12 R APOLLO LEASING COMPANY LTD 02558 001-400-3104-6900 00088 $855.11 88-1969 00066 39706 13 14 15 6 1 4 15. LEASE PAYMENT/FEB 92 —1969 01/14/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************•*•***************************•************•nit******* • $855.11 17 19 20 6 7 R DERIAN PRINTING SERVICE, INC. 02664 001-400-4202-4305 00666 $53.04 3157 03632 39707 21 22 23 24 131 "STOP WORK" NOTICES 3157 12/19/91 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $53.04 01/23/92 2 0 /21 *** VENDOR TOTAL*********•n********************************************************** $53.04 25 26 278 22 3 24R SUSAN*IIGELOW ASSOCIATES 04443 001-400-1121-4201 00051 $3,417.00 2 00073 39708 29 30 31 32 25 26 • 27 RECORDS MGMT SERV/JAN 92 2 01/22/92 CITY CLERK /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL**************•****************************************************** $3.417.00 33 34 35 36 26 29 30 R STEVEN*BLALOCK 04488 180-300-0000-3912 00351 $484.36 30198 02293 39709 37 38 39 40 31 32 33 FIRE_ FLOW FEE REFUND 30198 01/21/92 /FIRE FLOW FEE $0.00 01/23/92 . *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************************n*********43 5484.36 - 91 42 ,4 45 46 47 46 34 35 36 R C. A. P. E. 04490 001-400-2101-4316 00826 $95.00 TR4OO 00400 39710 37 3 a 39 CONF REG/T. JOHNSON TR4OO 01/13/92 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $95.00 49 60 51 52 40 41 42 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-3101-4303 00183 $778.40 01211 39711 53 54 55 56 43 44 46 WATER BILLS/DEC 91 12/31/91 MEDIANS /UTILITIES $0.00 01/23/92 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-4204-4303 00515 $379.39 01211 39711 S' 59 4G 4 7 � WATER BILLS/DEC 91 12/31/91 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES $0.00 01/23/92 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-6101-4303 00396 $1,812.553971163. 01211 60 61 62 64 49• 50 51 WATER BILLS/DEC 91 12/31/91 PARKS /UTILITIES $0.00 01/23/92 O5 66 67 52 53 54 58 49 0 71 1 72 55 56 `S7 i 74 75 74, J v 0 4.01 V 0 J • 411 41 FINANCE-SFA:340 TIME 15:2.5:31 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/23/92 PAGE 0002 DATE 01/23/92 FAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # • AMOUNT. INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENCDATE EXP I<' 2 a 6 *** vFND0R TOTAL ********prat********************ar*jr****ir******* ***Whir**it*arari ********* $2,970.34 5 6 7 B BI 9i R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 04418 001-400-6101-4303 00397 $12.69 08-54-10-3375 12111 39712 9 t0 ,2 WATER BILLING/DEC 91 —3375 01/09/92 PARKS /UTILITIES $0.00 01/23/92 H *** vpN0oR TOTAL *************************************************************#****** $12.69 t3 ,6 15 R CENTINELA SO. BAY VISA 03353 001-400-1201-4317 00271 $87.83 02136 39713 le zo 16 DEC 91 EXP/WISNIEWSKI 01/13/92 CITY MANAGER /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 01/23/92 . t, '7 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $87.83 2, 22 234 -, R BARBARA*CONKLIN • 03929 001-400-4202-4316 00230 $340.83 03660 39714 25 26 27 23 24 REIMB TUITION/BOOKS 01/13/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENDOR IoTAL******************************************************************** $340. 83 2e 29 30 3, 32 2735 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING 03617 001-400-2101-4201 00930 $489.57 3297274 00051 39715 33 34 36 2. 9 0 COMPUTER RENTAL/JAN 92 97274 01/07/92 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 S R CONNECTING POINT LEAING 03617 001-400-2201-4201 00278 $159.40 3297274 00051 39715 37 38 39 40 4, 42 43 43 31 32 3. COMPUTER RENTAL/JAN 92 97274 01/07/92 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICURIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING 03617 001-400-2701-4201 00041 $330.18 3297274 00051 39715 34 35 36 COMPUTER RENTAL/JAN 92 97274 01/07/92 CIVIL DEFENSE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING 03617 170-400-2103-4201 00108 $159.39 3297274 00051 39715 45 46 47 4B 37 19 COMPUTER RENTAL/JAN 92 97274 01/07/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,138.5451 49 40 41 42 R CORONET/MTI FILM & VIDEO, INC. 03091 001-400-2101-4305 01678 $2,935.36 349358 03182 39716 53 54 55 s6 57 59 so 43 44 45 DARE. SUPPLIES/GRANT 49358 01/07/92 210004 POLICE /O ICE OPER SUPPLIES $2T35.36 01/23/92 *** VENDOR T+r -TOTAL ****************************************************************** $2, 935. 36 46 47 48 R CPSRPC 04484 001-400-4601-4317 00143 $120.00 TR402 00402 39717 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 43 50 51 CONF REG/ESSLINGER TR402 _01/22/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 01723/92 2 3 68 69 70 71 72 56 7 ,3 74 75 7g, v J • • Y FINANCE--SFA140 TIMI: 15 25: 51 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/23/92 PAGE 0003 DATE 01/23/92 _ PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN it AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE .INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP N 2 s 6 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************crit******•!E******* *+r•�rrt***•rr ****ir*********•a**tr****tiara*•ern** $120. 00 6 8 7 8 91R DATA SAFE 00156 001-400-1206-4201 00937 $167.17 60163 00015 39718 9 0 11 1' 12 TAPE STORAGE/TO FEB 11 60163 01/15/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************•********************-*********************** $167. 17 12 13 14 115 6 14 15 R DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 00049 001-300-0000-3204 02497 $343.48 02290 39719 17 18 0 6 SEISMIC FEES/OCT—DEC 91 01/15/92 /BUILDING PERMITS $0.00 01/23/92 17 10 *** VENDOR TOTAL******•n***********-tt**************at********************************** $343 . 48 20 2' 22 24 191 20 2' R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 00267 001-400-3104-4251 00087 $320.21 120149 03656 39720 z4 25 26 23 24 HIGHWAY MAINT/NOV 91 20149 12/20/91 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 01/23/92 R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 00267 105-400-2601-4251 00152 $320.20 120149 03656 39720 227 8 29 30 25 2C '27 HIGHWAY MAINT/NOV 91 20149 12/20/91 STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $640. 41 331 2 33 34 35 28 23 3O R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 00269 001-400-2101-4201 00931 $852.00 2 5095989.E 00006 39721 36 37 38 30 31 3243 33 DISPATCH SYS MAINT/JAN92 59892 01/13/92 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 R DIGITAL_ EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 00269 • 001-400-2201-4201 00279 $568.00 250959892 00006 39721 40 41 42 34 35 35 DISPATCH SYS MAINT/JAN92 59892 01/13/92 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************$1,420.00 41, 4�0. 00 4a 45 46 47 37 38 39 R DISCOVER USA 00271 170-400-2103-5402 00049 $2,160.67 A -02—A 03192 39722 46 49 50 S1 4.0 Al 42 NARCOTICS ENTRY VESTS —02—A 01/09/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS/EQUIP—MORE THAN $500 $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** 2 $, 160. 67 sz 53 54 55 43 44 45 EASTMAN, INC. 02514 001-400-1208-4305 01018 $100.98 8347633/91294 01224 39723 56 57 58 59 46 47 48 OFFICE SUPP/STOCK/DEC 91 91294 12/31/91 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/23/92 **it VENDOR TOTAL************************ar******************************************* $100.98 60 61 62 64 . 49 50 R ELYSONS HEATING 04489 001-300-0000-3206 02301 $33.50 30213 02294 39724 65 66 67 52 53 54 BUILDING PERMIT REFUND 30213 01/21/92 /PLUMBING PERMITS $0.00 01/23/92 68 69 70 71 I 55 66 Q 74 75 79 72 73 111 VIM VIP .. J r ar J J 51 & FINM2E.-SEA3•1-0 TIM: 15-25:31 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST 3/92 PAGE 0004 FOR OL• 3 �- UM11_ U1/.1/.1 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT 'DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 11 2 5 / 66* VF._Nsp? 'TOTAL ***4*******************stat******************a************************ $33. 50 6 6 8 8 9 R EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 01397 705-400-1215-4186 00096 $4,997.64 932-0339-6 02770 39725 9 10 UN—F:M' CLAIMS/JUL—SEP 91 339-6 01/02/92 UNEMPLOYMENT /UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS $0.00 01/23/92 **if VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $4, 997. 64 ,2 13 14 5 6 ,4 t51 R NORA*FRASER 04487 001-300-0000-3204 02498 $1,147.50 28440 02_295 39726 6 zo 6 : 1 '9 IIUILDING PERMIT REFUND 28440 01/22/92 /BUILDING PERMITS $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENOOR TOTAL*****************.Ir************************************************** $1,147.50 2, 22 z< 19 • 23 21 R GERBER AMBULANCE SERVICE 02897 001-400-2101-4201 00928 $629.50 19648/19430 03195 39727 25 26 1 ,23 24 r�ISONER F=MFRS SERVICES 19430 12/11/91 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $624.50 ze 29 30 31 25 27 R GFOA PUBLICATI001-400-1202-431635 ONS 00427 00407 $8.00 02781 39728 32 33 34 2e 29 30 F'UIiLICATIONS/h"INANCE 01/22/92 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING $0.00 01/23/92 *** VFNOOR IOTAL******************************************************************** $8.00 36 3] 38 m 31 32 33 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00441 $50.53 00130 39729 41 42 44 34 35 36 TELE CHARGES/JAN 92 01/22/92 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE $0.00 01/23/92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00961 $74.94 00130 39729 45 48 37 36 39 TELE CHARGES/JAN 92 01/22/92 POLICE /TELEPHONE - $0.00 01/23/92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00404 $25.31 00130 39729 49 50 51 40 41 42 TELE CHARGES/JAN 92 01/22/92 FIRE /TELEPHONE $0.00 01/23/92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00635 $43.6955 00130 39729 52 53 54 43 44 45 TELE CHARGES/JAN 92 01/22/92 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $194.47 557 59 590 46 41 4E R GTEL 01340 001-400-1101-4304 00426 4*20.66 1683501 00067 39731 61 62 63 49 50 5 1 PHONE SYS MAINT/AUG—JAN 83501 01/04/92 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE $0.00 01/23/92 b5 65 66, 67 52 53 54 55 68 69 70 71 56 19, 72 )3 4 i 5 L 11. V 1% J V J 110 116, 8 V ,I 4 �1 FIN.4NCE--SFA:340 TIMI= 15 25: St CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/23/92 PAGE 0005 DATE 01/23/92 2I V PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # DATE INVC ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN #' AMOUNT PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO # AMOUNT UNENC CHK # DATE EXP iN 2 R GTEL 01340 • 001-400-1121-4304 00473 $56.09 1683501 00067 39731 5 6 7 a 9 10 12 ' 6 9 R PHONE SYS MAINT/AUG-JAN GTEL 83501 01/04/92 01340 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE 001-400-1131-4304 00344 $29.52 $0.00 1683501 00067 01/23/992 39731 , , 12R PHONE SYS MAINT/AUG-JAN GTEL 83501 01/04/92 01340 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 001-400-1141-4304 00491 $56.09 $0.00 1683501 00067 01/23/92 39731 13 15 15 t3 15 R PHONE SYS MAINT/AUG-JAN GTEL 83501 01/04/92 01340 CITY- TREASURER /TELEPHONE 001-400-1201-4304 00527 $47.23 $0.00 1683501 00067 01/23/92 39731 " 16 20 16 7 10 PHONE SYS MAINT/AUG-JAN GTEL 83501 01/04/92 01340 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 001-400-1202-4304 00541 $171.22 $0.00 1683501 00067 01/23/92 39731 21 22 23 24 19 2' R PHONE SYS MAINT/AUG-JAN GTEL 83501 01/04/92 01340 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE 001-400-1203-4304 00545 $70.85 $0.00 1683501 00067 01/23/92 39731 25 26 28 22 23 24 R PHONE SYS MAINT/AUG-JAN GTEL 83501 01/04/92 01340 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 001-400-1206-4304 00440 $85.60 $0.00 1683501 00067 01/23/92 39731 29 30 31 32 25 26 27 R PHONE SYS MAINT/AUG-JAN GTEL 83501 01/04/92 01340 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 001-400-1207-4304 00356 $56.09 $0.00 1683501 00067 01/23/92 39731 33 34 35 36 6 2 3 30 R PHONE SYS MAINT/AUG-JAN GTEL 83501 01/04/92 01340 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE 001-400-1208-4304 00187 $29.52 $0.00 1683501 00067 01/23/92 39731 3' 39 ao 31 32 33 R PHONE SYS MAINT/AUG-JAN GTEL- 83501 01/04/92 01340 GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE 001-400-2101-4304 00960 $1,107.00 $0.00 1683501 00067 01/23/92 39731 °' 42 43 a4 34 5 35 !-3 PHONE SYS MAINT/AUG-JAN GrEL 83501 01/04/92 01340 POLICE /TELEPHONE 001-400-2201-4304 00403 $29.52 $0.00 1683501 00067 01/23/92 39731 75 46 47 m 3' 36 39 R PHONE SYS MAINT/AUG-JAN GTEL 83501 01/04/92 01340 FIRE /TELEPHONE 001-400-2401-4304 00426 $41.33 $0.00 1683501 00067 01/23/92 39731 49 so 51 40 41 42 N PHONE SYS MAINT/AUG-JAN GTEL 83501 01/04/92 01340 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE 001-400-4101-4304 00545 $141.70 $0.00 1683501 00067 01/23/92 39731 52 E3 5'' 55 sb 43 44 4`' R PHONE SYS MAINT/AUG-JAN GTEL 83501 01/04/92 01340 PLANNING /TELEPHONE 001-400-4201-4304 00492 $227.30 $0.00 1683501 00067 01/23/92 39731 '' m 59 6o 46 4763 46 R PHONE SYS MAINT/AUG-JAN GTEL 83501 • 01/04/92 01340 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 001-400-4202-4304 00567 $312.91 $0.00 1683501 00067 01/23/92 39731 61 62 64 49 50 51 PHONE SYS MAINT/AUG-JAN 83501 01/04/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE $0.00 01/23/92 6? 66 67 66 52 53 54 69 70 71 72 55 56 ' 73 7a 7515, 4.0 47 V v v ✓ 4 1 .r • FIN NCE --3F(:340 TIME 15:25::31 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/23/92 • J PAGE 0006 J DATE 01/23/92 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN ,g . AMOUNT. INV/REF PO # CHK # 1.0-SCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD ik ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R GTFL- 01340 001-400-4601-4304 00634 $83.61 1663301 00067 39731 e PHONE SYS MAINT/AVG—JAN 83501 01/04/92 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE $0.00 01/23/92 91 R G'fF_L 01340 001-400-6101-4304 00382 $29.52 1683501 00067 39731 9 io ,2 1=Hi]NE SYS MAINT/AUG—JAN 83501 01/04/92 PARKS /TELEPHONE $0.00 01/23/92 R ore. 01340 130-400-3302-4304 00547 $354.24 1683501 00067 39731 ,3 5 ,6 PHONE SYS MAINT/AVG—JAN 83501 01/04/92 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTA!_. *************************i *******************njr********* r******** ** - $2,952.00 17 20 6 ,6 R FRANK t3. *HALL & CO. OF CALIF. 03147 705-400-1210-4201 00089 $500.00 560691 03071 39732 2, 22 23 24 19' m , PUBLIC 13OND/BRUTSCH 60691 01/16/92 AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $500.00 25 26 27e 22 23 24 R CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH 04075 705-400-1217-4182 00209 $35,738.48 03073 39733 29 30 ,z 27 REIMB WORK COMP/DEC 91 12/31/91 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR $0.00 01/23/92 *46* VENDOR TOTAL **********************************#********************************* $35, 738. 48 33 34 35 35 29 30 R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY 00149 001-400-1206-4201 00934 $1,202.00 36P1033 00009 39734 37 3B 39 40 41 42 43 a5 46 47 49 50 51 52 3, 32 33 COMPUTER SYS MAINT/JAN92 P1Q33 01/02/92 DATA PROCESSIN4-7CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $77.00 01/23 P.. HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY 00149 001-400-1206-4201 00935 $3,249.45 8H62754 00032 39734 34 35 35 SOFTWARE MAINT/JAN—MAR92 62754 01/02/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23 ' R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY 00149 001-400-1206-4201 00936 $3,069.00 36M1005 00010 39734 37 38 39 TERMINAL MAINT/JAN—MAR92 M1085 01/02/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.•• • .. *** VENDOR TOTAL**;s***************************************************************** $7,520.45 40 4 , 42 R SALLY*HOLLANDER 04330 001-210-0000-2110 04677 $3,300.00 26028 03831 39735 53 54 ss' 11 65 66 67 43 44 45 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 26028 01/21/92 /DEPOSITSlWORK GUARANTEE $07011 • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3,300.00 46 47 40 R WILLIAM*KELLY 00362 001-400-1213-4180 00561 $1,836.00 03070 39736 4'z 50 s+ ADV RETIREMENT PMT/JAN92 01/15/92 RETTREHE /RETTREMENT $070 O1/2 52 53 54 68 69 70 7, 72 _i5 56 1 73 74 41Z7 75 . 0 J J r 1 F IN:;NCF_- SFA340 TIr1G 15.25•:;71 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/23/92 PAGE 0007 DATE 01/23/92 2i PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # 31 _ DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP S. �r ‘1. W 5 VENDOR TOTAL *****************************tt************it*********ir*ir*sr*sr********* $1,836.00 5 8 r R KIT'S CAMERA-] 04483 170-4d0-103-5401 00006 $97.43 03191 39737 9 10 ,2 ,, - 12 FLAH CAMERA/NARCOTICS 01/22/92 SPEC INVESTOTNS /EQUIPMENT—LESS THAN $50 $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******tr************ **************************************** ****** $97. 43 ,2 13 16 14 15 R COMMANDER MICHAEL*LAVIN 00792 001-400-2101-4312 01841 .$115.7502689 39738 17 e 16 n 19 MEALS/P. O. S. T. CLASS 01/22/92 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************** **************** ************ $115. 75 zo 21 22 191 20 21 R LEGAL 000KSTORE, INC. 00738 001-400-2101-4305 01679 $340.13 811474 03186 39739 223 4 24 25 26 �8 22 23 24 1992 PENAL CODE COPIES 11474 01/15/92 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $340.13 01/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************$340.133, 29 30 3z 33 34 3 25 26 27 R MANERI SIGN CO., INC. 01255 001-400-6101-4309 01166 $149.39 4581—IN 03642 39740 "PARK 29 CLOSED" SIGNS 81—IN 12/31/91 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $149.39 01/23/92 , `' 30 R MANERI SIGN CO., INC. 01255 001-400-6101-4309 01167 $400.53 4580—IN 03636 39740 "KEEP 36 3] 38 39 3, PARK CLEAN" SIGNS 80—IN 12/31/91 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $400.52 01/23/92 32 33 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************•************************************************* $544. 92 40 41 43 14 35 R KENNETH A.*MEERSAND 04138 001-400-1132-4201 00096 $11,2_00.000319447 3, 39741 44 45 46 7 LEGAL SERV/NOV—DEC 91 12/31/91 CTY PROSECUTOR /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 38 39 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************•n******************9t******************** $11,200.00 4a 49 50 52, 40 41 42 R OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR °r. VOSE 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00694 $12,294.25 02135 39742 S3 54 55 43 LEGAL SERV/NOV—DEC 91 12/31/91 420001 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 44 R OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00695 $13,431.2559 4, 02135 39742 ss 57 68 46 LEGAL SERV/NOV—DEC 91 12/31/91 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ' $0.00 01/23/92 47 R OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE ' 02892 705-400-1209-4201 00241 $62.50 � 02135 39742 A9 60 61 62 63 LEGAL SERV/NOV—DEC 91 12/31/91 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 44 51 64 65 66 67 52 53 54 68 69 70 7, 55 56 ]3 t ]5 72 4 / 19. 0 ..v • F IN:\NCE--SFA340 TIME 15:25:31 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/23/92 PAGE 0008 .i DATE 01/23/92 ' PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # . AMOUNT, INV/REF PO # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC CHK # DATE EXP iN 2 5 6 *** v!-_NOUR i0TAL**#**********************#*********#*********#*********#************ $25,788,00 7 9 0 10 9, R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE 00321 001-400-2101-4304 00962 $10.71 00036 39743 ,2 (;: ;F'U(F_hi HOOKUPS/JAN 92 01/02/92 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 01/23/92 ,3 14 *a* VENOUR TOTAL *********#***#****#********#*#********************#***************** $10.71 15 16 17 16 , R PEP BOYS 00608 160-400-3102-4311 19 00194 $31.26 15797/15796/95 00156 39744 zo 16 MISC. CHARGES/JAN 92 96/95 01/15/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01723/92 21 7 u r **itVENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $31.26 23 2a 19 25 26 1 R RADISSON SUITE HOTEL 04486 27 001-400-2101-4312 01842 $286.00 02690 39745 ze 22 HOTEL/M. LAVIN 01/22/92 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST $0.00 01/23/92 29 23 30 24 *** VEN0OR TOTAL ******************************************************************** 31 $286.00 32 25 33 25 34 27 SYI_V IA*ROOT 107 04061 ' 001-400-4102-4201 00341 $215.00 01958 39746 36 36 211 SA=C SERV/JAN 7, 92 107 01/13/92 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 3, 29 36 30 *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************************************# 39 $215. 00 40 31 41 32 42 33 R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES 01578 001-400-3104-4201 00108 $787.50 91534 03659 39747 41 34 TRAFFIC ENG SERV/DEC 91 91534 12/31/91 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 45 35 46 36 *** vENDOR (OTAL##*###*####*#*######*#######***#*#***#####*##*#*###*#*****#*#*####** 47 $787,50 40 37 49 38 50 39 R SIGNS, ETC. 03205 001-400-6101-4309 , 01168 $324.75 1208 03641 39748 51 52 40 "PARK CLOSED" SIGN 1208 01/07/92 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $324.75 01/23/92 63 41 54 42 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 55 $3?_4.75 56 43 57 44 56 45 R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00121 $1,308.00 58628 03341 39749 59 45 BUS PASS SALES/DEC 91 58628 01/17/92 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 01/2:3/92 e, 47 62 48 *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************************##rt***** * $1, 308. 00 63 64 49 65 50 66 5, R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL 00107 001-400-2101-4201 00929 *555.50 03196 39750 67 67 52 BLOOD ALCOHOL TESTING 01/09/9. POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0700 01/23/92 69 53 70 54 7, 72 55 73 56 74 57 75 797 J 4✓ 0 V J 1 .110 J JJ IV \r ,444 1144 .11174 r 1147 Oar flay TIME 15.21?...!I CITY OF FIERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/23/92 PAVE n{y0r DATE 01/23/52 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # 31 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT'DF_SCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 3N 2 3 4 6*'' . NF)tJR TOTAL *sr;xartr-�******************�t•�tao-�r**********�t?r********air**** va #****** $555.50 s 6 7 7 9 9 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 110-300-0000-3302 43647 $15,185.00 02776 39751 9 0 II 12 IO 12 CITATION SURCHARGE/DEC91 12/31/91 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 01/23/92 *4* V:=NOOK TOTAL **************•tarn**#at•************* l,f *****,F************ **** r******* $1.5, 185. 00 13 I4 I 166 13 14' m R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00400 110-300-0000-3302 43649 $759.00 03351 39752 I) B 19 20 16 CITATION COURT BAIL 01/16/92 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 01/23/92 17 is *** VENDOR TOTAL *******************************t:*,********************************** $759.00 2' 22 23 24 9 20 23 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 04485 110-300-0000-3302 43648 $22.00 2801844 03350 39753 25 2fi 27 29 22 CITATION COURT BAIL 01844 01/09/92 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 01/23/92 23 24 *** VENDOR 'MITA:_********************************************************,t*********** $22.00 29 30 32 26 27 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00331 $13,062.01 00012 39754 33 34 35 36 29 STREET LITE BILLS/DEC 91 12/31/91 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES $0.00 01/23/92 29 30 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $13,062.01 3' 3A 39 40 31 32 33 0 J. E. /*TALLER ICO 04247 001-400-1206-4201 00933 $40.00 85 09600 39755 4i 42 43 44 J4 COMPUTER SERV/JAN 92 85 01/21/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 35 35 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $40.00 45 46 49 Jr 30 39 R TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION, INC. 03421 001-400-2101-4201 00932 $200.00 RE:0926 00069 39756 49 50 53 52 COMPUTER TUNING/DEC 91 :0926 01/02/92 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 41 42 *** VENDOR TOTAL**'****************************************************************** $200.00 5! 54 55 s6 43 m 45 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-202-0000-2021 00137 $85.89 01275 39757 S1 se 60 46 DISCOUNT OFFERED 12/31/91 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 01/23/92 47 40 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-202-0000-2022 00137 $85.89CR 01275 39757 6' 62 63 64 49. DISCOUNT TAKEN 12/31/91 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 01/23/92 50 51 65 66 67 69 52 53 54 69 70 71 72 55 56 g) ,3 74 5 gr • • 1,4 h►• I, %s kor 4.4 V F INANCE— S==A':340 TIME 15:25::31 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/23/92' PAGE 0010 DATE 01/23/92 zl rAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT, INV/REF PO # CHK # . DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP4. 1\ R TRIANGLE HARDWARE` 00123 001-400-2'01-4309 01230 $6.40 01275 39757 e 71 0 900123 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 91 12/31/91 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/23/92 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 001-400-3103-4:09 01300 $5.82 01275 39757 9 10 12 •12 13 14 1 6 17 IB MISC. CHARGES/DEC 91 12/31/91 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/23/92 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-3104-4309 00794 $170.87 01275 39757 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 91 12/31/91 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/23-792 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-4204-4309 02223 $423.4401275 39757 16' MISC. CHARGES/DEC 91 12/31/91 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/23/92 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-6101-4309 01169 $35.24 01275 39757 Zo 21 22 23 15 20 21 21 23 24 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 91 12/31/91 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/23/92 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 00123 105-400-2601-4309 00775 $59.53 01275 39757 24 25 26 MI!";;. CHARGES/DEC 91 12/31/91 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0. 00 01/23/92 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 110-400-3302-4305 00873 $24.04 01275 39757 28 29 30 3z 25 26 27 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 91 12/31/91 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/23/92 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 0012.3 160-400-3102-4309 00671 $47.64 01275 39757 33 34 35 23 29 30 i9I8C. CHARGES/DEC 91 12/31/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/23/92 *** VENDOR 'TOTAL_ it�t tt•r. • ttat�tat*• itatatitiaat*�tatit•uitit•�tttu+tit•tr•3r�titittttt•�atitatat•tragi►**at*•�t*ttit•n*it*tt•it#atiti►it•�riFititii• $772. 98 36 37 38 39 32 33 R V ". V MANUFACTURING 01938 001-400-2101-4187 00466 $120.04 12420/CM12448 03166 3975843 40 41 42 34 35 6 BADGES/POLICE 12448 01/03/92 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $116.85 01/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $120.04 45 46 m� 3, 38 39 R WARD — THK 03937 705-400-1209-4201 00242 $6,063.0051 03069 39759 49 50 40 41 42 REIMB LIAR/DEC 91 12/31/91 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/23/92 R WARD — THK 03937 705-400-1209-4324 00240 $971.01 03069 39759 62 53 54 ss' se 59 43 44 45 RF_IMB LIAB/DEC 91 12/31/91 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS f07607-01/23/92-17 R WARD — THK 03937 705-400-1209-432_4 00241 325,823.32 03069 39759 46 42 413 SET1LEMENUMARCUS 12/31/91 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS $0.00 01/23/92 R WARD — THK. 03937 705-400-1209-4324 00242 $850.57 03069 39759 60 61 62 6i 66 67 49' 50 51 SETTLEMENT/SCHWARTZ 12/31/91 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEi N fS $07U0 ---0T7237927—(7. sz 53 541 68 69 70 55 56 �7 72 73 74 7s' J 4I 416, 4•i 6. • • • • 41 FINANCE—SF-A:340 TIME 15:25:31 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0011 2 3 ` UMI VI/e3/Yd 1 PAY VCNDOR NAME VND it ACCOUNT NUMBER ,TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO ## CHK ## DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP N 2 4 6 ]I to -,m-* .L ,:,OR TOTAL *****=r**it************************ **** ***************************** $33,707.90 5 6 7 B r .. R WELDON WILLIAMS & LICK 00311 110-400-3302-4305 00872 $2,544.01 29624/29625 03323 39760 9 10 , 1z 13 F,AK>:ING PERMIT STICKERS 29625 12/19/91 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $2,544.01 01/23/92 *** VEF!??C)'i ((ITA!_ 31iF �F?r*is###**16###**'.F****####*it##*#*###*####**#**#*#*##*#**#****###*#*# '7 $�, 544. 01 ,2 13 1s 14 5 *** PAY COI)E TOTAL****************************************************************** - $184.937.52 16 17 18 19 16 1] 10 *** TOTAL WARRANTS ****************************************************************** $184,937.52 20 20 21 22 234 19. 20 „ 21 24 25 26 27 22 23 24 25 I-HEREBY-CERTI,Y THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY. - THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGES30 WARRANT REGISTER �1,T�O�� INCLUSIVE, OF THE 29 29 31 26 27 f—�4>=--AR6-ACEIIRT, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLEFOR FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BBU/Gf T. 32 33 34 35 29Y ./ /�. 36 29• 30 31 FINANCE DIRECO DATE __IA.:VA 3 ] 39 32 33 34 40 41 42 43 35 36 3] 44 46 46 4] 38 3 9 40 49 49 50 51 41 42 43 52 53 54 55 • 44 45 56 57 58 59 • 46 47 48 49 60 61 62 63 • 50 51 52 64 65 66 67 • 53 54 55 68 69 70 7, 1 56 5 \] 74 75 72 >3 J • • O Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CANCELLATION ON WARRANTS January 21, 1992 For the Meeting of January 28, 1992 Please consider the following request for cancellation of the warrants listed below. #037598 - 7/11/91 - Sharon Connelly - $50.00 - Account Number 001-300-0000-3826 - Payment stopped. Warrant was never received by payee. #038908 - 11/7/91- Jean Brian - $85.25 - Account Number 001-400- 2101-4317. Employee did not attend conference. #038973 - 11/7/91 - Red Lion Sacramento Inn - $206.46 - Account Number 001-400-2101-4317. Employee did not attend conference. #038942 - 11/7/91 - Independent Order of Oddfellows - $455.00 - Account Number 001-210-0000-2110. Payee never received warrant. New warrant issued. #038912 - 11/7/91 - John Calhoun - $20.00 - Account Number 001- 300-0000-3418 - Vendor number error related to computer crash. #039407 - 12/19/91 - Edward S. Kreins - $4000.00 - Account Number 001-400-1203-4201. Payee requested that payment for services rendered be paid in the new calendar year. Warrant was never mailed. Concur: C Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager -71.3A4(Z4-Cl„ GaryB s h City T easurer Noted or fiscal impact Viki Copeland January 22, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of January 28, 1992 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS February 11, 1992 Report on implementation of new computer system (GIP) Data Processing Council 8/13/91 Report on procedure for protecting survey monuments 16th to 19th sts. Public Works Dir. Quarterly update Goals Implementa- tion Plan City Manager Council 7/23/91 Vehicle parking on unimproved r -o -w including pedestrian walk streets Public Works Director Council 10/9/90 Map and time schedule for street sweeping Public Wks. Dir. Coordination of street sweeping with trash pickup days Public Hearings Appeal of Planning Commission denial of 3 lot subdivision at 206-212 Prospect Ave. February 25, 1992 Recommendation regarding telephone system replacement Proposed ordinance on property surveys within the City Greenbelt parking and improvements (from joint mtg. w/P.C.) CIP 89-151 - Award contract for Office of Traffic Safety grant Award contract for janitorial services Public Works Dir. Planning Director General Services Dir. Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Award downtown maintenance agreement Public Works Director Alternatives for parking solutions on PCH (GIP) Building Director Street lighting/Crossing Guards - resolutions ordering preparation of reports Public Works Director Identify misc. revenue, develop appropriate fee (GIP) Finance Director March 10, 1992 Cable T.V. Board appointment Community Resources Dir. March 12 or 19, 1992 Joint meeting of Council with School District Board & Planning Commission March 24, 1992 Report on Management audits (GIP) Finance Director City Mgr.3/25/91 Amendment of ordinance regulating real estate signs Building Director April 14, 1992 Rotation of Mayor CIP 85-137 - Valley Ardmore overlay - accept as complete Public Works Director April 28, 1992 Proclamation declaring May Water Awareness Month 3rd Quarter CIP status report Public Works Director Quarterly update of Goals Implementation Program City Manager May 12, 1992 Proclamation Public Works Week May 18 to 22 Public Works Director Project Touch lease renewal (Rms. 3 & 11) Community Resources Dir. May 26, 1992 2 Street lighting/Crossing Guard (a) resolution approving report (b) resolution setting public hearing for June 23 June 9, 1992 Approval of Land Use Element (GIP) Dispute Resolution Services lease renewal June 11 or 18, 1992 Joint meeting of Council with Planning Commission June 23, 1992 Report on civilian enforcement officers (GIP) Street lighting/Crossing Guard public hearing July 28, 1992 4th Quarter CIP status report Quarterly update of Goals Implementation Program August 11, 1992 Hope Chapel Lease renewal (Rms. 5, 6A) September 8, 1992 Association for Retarded Citizens lease renewal (Rm. 1, 2, 15) South Bay Hospital District lease renewal (Rm 9) Easter Seals lease renewal (Rms. 16, 17) December, 1992 Completion of HIP Program Project Touch lease renewal (Rm.C) Public Works Director Planning Director Community Resources Dir. Public Safety Director Public Works Director Public Works Director City Manager Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Planning Director Community Resources Dir. ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Caltrans utility maintenance agrmt. Historic Preservation Ordinance (with Land Use Element) Public Works Director Planning Director ***************************************************************** Initiated by Party Date Council 5/8/90 Goal 4 Re. oil project CUP - define "temporary" as relates to height of project Planning Director 5/16/90 Options to computerize per- sonnel as part of payroll function Finance Director Council 8/14/90 Review of standard CUP conditions Planning Dir. Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" City Mgr.2/21/91 RFP for computer system Council 3/12/91 South School Conceptual design Council Bid spec. for office systems (furniture) Award of bid for purchase of computer equipment for Police Dept. Council 6/6/91 Review Bldg/Zoning Code changes to improve liveability Staff 7/25/91 Adjustment of Park Tax Council 8/27 Revision of allowable uses in open space zone Council 9/24/91 Effect of nonconforming ordinance on damaged structures Report on productivity incentives for employees (GIP) Public Works Dir. Data Processing Community Resources Finance Director Police Chief Planning Director Building Director Planning Planning Dept. Personnel Director Participate w/school civics program coordinator (GIP) Personnel Director Rental agreement for office copier Interim City Manager Statistical survey - requested at 4/23/91 meeting Report on cost effectiveness of downtown enforcement (GIP) Police/Finance Report on increasing police foot patrol Police Chief 5 Honorable Mayor and Members of January 23, 1992 City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of January 28, 1992 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS DECEMBER 1991 December Revenue and Expenditure Reports will be submitted when Midyear Budget Review is conducted since they represent the first half of the year. Concur: Steve Wisniewski Viki Co eland Interim City Manager Attachments Finance Director CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - DECEMBER 1991 FUND GENERAL NUMBER ACCOUNT 12/1/91 BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENTS WARRANTS ADJUSTMENTS 12/31/91 BALANCE 001 GENERAL 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT 109 VEHICLE PARKING DIST. 110 PARKING 115 STATE GAS TAX 120 COUNTY GAS TAX 125 PARK REC.FAC.TAX 126 RAILROAD RT.OF WAY 127 6% UTILITY USERS TAX 140 CDBG 145 PROPOSITION A FUND 150 GRANT FUND 155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE 170 POLICE ASSET SEIZURE 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 705 SELF INSURANCE FUND TRUST ACCOUNTS $1,811,228.91 $1,694,118.20 $1,403,042.86 $72,506.30 $140,356.99 $31,304.10 $71,313.41 $101,704.69 $1,215,459.07 $21,721.30 $27,667.03 $0.00 $1,836,879.56 $3,500.00 $936,806.18 $68,009.11 $158,426.69 $101,961.82 $0.00 $0.00 $410,208.62 $13,923.00 $62,544.09 $0.00 $55,655.03 $21,765.50 $2,087,371.49 $849.55 $1,391,698.02 $180,808.00 $500,153.36 $4,281.67 ($16,092.36) $0.00 $361,166.22 $0.00 $241,907.61 $7,466.34 $1,288.05 $19,875.31 $4,290.22 $97.86 $5,550.08 $4,029.99 $318.16 $0.00 $2,297.46 $0.00 $824.39 $76,233.66 $4,215.24 $1,412.09 $2,347,743.64 $76,833.00 $856,578.66 $25,565.45 $6,331.44 $94,779.82 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,665.06 $0.00 $5,111.48 $10,134.07 $33,751.88 $0.00 $69,289.98 $121,539.90 $634,153.46 $18,021.46 $2,731.42 $115,927.07 $177,779.86 $3,265.27 $1,583,969.58 $0.00 $88,501.73 $0.00 $4,382.54 $3,333.33 $901.59 $135,566.29 $19,625.79 $4,974.83 $0.00 $25.68 $2,256,522.60 $1,439,428.59. $163,886.28 ($17,813.48) $1,063,690.73 $24,499.62 $261,960.06 $1,008,845.28 $172,204.94 $0.00 $413,381.48 $59,210.76 $72,231.85 $2,018,754.34 $1,523,343.59 $500,872.29 $2,262,361.30 $316,433.64 $12,453,885.17 $2,316,453.24 $2,794,383.10 $1,231,747.74 $2,793,159.90 $13,539,813.87 BALANCE RECEIVED PAID BALANCE $2,143.50 $663,040.91 $663,908.11 $11,296,959.31 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $852,130.36 $542,749.23 INACTIVE DEPOSIT HELD BY FISCAL AGENT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY ••$419,558.19 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE $1,276.30 GENERAL PAYROLL OUTSTANDING CHECKS INACTIVE DEPOSIT GARY BRUTSCH, JANUARY 22, CITY 92 TREASURER BALANCE $1,476,915.19 $9,464.26 $1,486,379.45 $94,379.24 $1,392,000.21 $12,149,089.67 $13,541,089.88 Mayor and Members of the City Council -SS/ 7 January 16, 1992 City Council Meeting January 28, 1992 ADDENDUM TO ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH The Treasurer's past practice has been to deal with S.E.C. registered investment companies only. Additionally, the Treasurer retains sole discretion over security trading except for monies invested with the State and County pools (investment officers for these pools are highly regulated). I inadvertently left this language out of the original resolu- tion. This new language has been inserted on line 21-23 on page #1 of the amended resolution. Respectfully submitted, Gary L. Biu sch City Treasurer NOTED: Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT AND FILING OF THE ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE YEAR 1992 WHEREAS, the California State Legislature passed legislation during the 1984 session requiring the filing of an annual Statement of Investment Policy by local public agencies; and WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of California signed such legislation into law effective January 1, 1985 (Chapter 1226); and WHEREAS, the City Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach declares the annual Statement of Investment Policy to be as follows: PURPOSE: This statement is intended to provide a guideline for the prudent investment of temporary idle cash, trust funds and restricted monies and to outline a policy for maximizing the efficiency of the cash management system. Ultimate investment goals include the enhancement of economic status and the protection of pooled cash investments. OBJECTIVE: The cash management system of the City of Hermosa Beach is designed to accurately monitor and forecast expenditures and revenues, thus insuring the investment of monies to the fullest extent possible. Attempts to obtain highest interest yields possible are statement of fact as long as investments meet the criteria required for safety and liquidity. POLICY: The City of Hermosa Beach operates its investment program with State and self-imposed constraints. It does not buy stocks; it does not speculate; it does not deal in futures, options or security loan agreements. With regard to investment companies, the City will deal only with investment companies registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The City Treasurer will have sole discretion over Security Trading, except the state of California and Los Angeles County Investment pool. Longer term investments (over one year) are generally limited to maturities of 3 years or less, but will never exceed five years. Criteria for selecting investments and the absolute order of priority are: 1. Safety 2. Liquidity 3. Yield 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The City's investment philosophy is to insure the safety of principle and to provide money when needed. A high dollar yield on investments, though important, ranks third in the priority of investment strategy. Depository Services Money must be deposited in state or national banks, state or federal savings associations, or state or federal credit unions in the state. It may be in inactive deposits, active deposits or interest-bearing active deposits. The deposits cannot exceed the amount of the bank's or savings and loan's paid up capital and surplus. We require that each financial institution submit current financial statements which are evaluated prior to the investment of funds. We use the following criteria: The institution must have been in business at years. The institution must submit In addition, examination is Losses category to evaluate institution's asset base. least three audited financial statements. made of the Reserve for Loan the financial trend of the Whenever possible, the use of several years' financial is evaluated to present a trend of activity in the institution. data We also require that interest be paid to the City on a monthly basis (current state law only requires quarterly payment). Authorized Investments Generally, investments shall be made in the context of "prudent man" rule, which states that, "investments shall be made with judgement and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived." The City is further governed by the California Government Code, Sections 53600 et seq. Within the context of these limitations, the following investments are authorized, as further limited herein: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TCD's (Time Certificates of Deposits) which are insured for $100,000 by FDIC or FSLIC or fully collateralized as required by state law if over $100,000 are purchased. Not more than 5% of the City's portfolio is invested in any one insitu- tion. Time Certificates of Deposits are safekept in a legally acceptable safekeeping account. An institution must meet the following criteria to be considered by the City: 1. The institution must be located in California. 2. The institution must have current financial information, signed contract and waiver on file with the City. 3. The institution must maintain a net worth to asset ratio of at least 5%, and have a positive earnings record. 4. The institution must be at least 3 years old. 5. For collateralized investments, the institution must have at least $100 million in assets. Acceptable collateral is 110% of the public fund account in government securities. U. S. TREASURY'S are direct obligations of the United States Government. U.S. TBILLS are issued weekly with maturity dates up to one year. They are issued and traded on a discount basis and the interest is figured on a 360 day basis, actual number of days. They are issued in amounts of $10,000 and up, in multiples of $5,000. They are a highly liquid security. U.S. TNOTES are initially issued with two to ten year maturities. They are actively traded in a large secondary market and are very liquid. The Treasury may issue note issues with a minimum of $5,000. BANKERS ACCEPTANCES are negotiable time drafts drawn to finance the export, import, shipment or storage of goods, and they are termed "Accepted" when a bank guarantees to pay the face value at maturity. A Banker's Acceptance constitutes an irrevocable obligation of the accepting bank and a contingent obligation of the drawer and of any endorsees whose names appear upon it. The bank is protected by its customer's agreement to provide the necessary funds in advance of the maturity of the Acceptance and also by the pledge of documents such as bills of lading, independent warehouse of terminal receipts, and other documents evidencing ownership and the insurance of the goods so financed. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Cities and other local agencies are authorized to purchase Banker's Acceptances subject to several restrictions. First, the Banker's Acceptance must be eligible for purchase by Federal Reserve Systems. Second, purchases of Banker's Acceptances must not exceed two hundred seventy (270) days' maturity or 40% of the City's surplus money invested under Sections 53601 and/or 53635. Finally, no more than 5% of the agency's surplus funds may be invested in the Banker's Acceptances of any one commercial bank (Government Code Sections 53601(f), 53635(f). LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND'is a special fund in the State Treasury which local agencies may use to deposit funds for investment. There is no minimum investment period and the minimum transaction is $5,000, in multiples of $1,000 above that, with a maximum of $5,000,000 for any agency. The City is restricted to a maximum of eight transactions per month. It offers high liquidity because deposits can be converted to cash in twenty-four hours and no interest is lost. All interest is distributed to those agencies participating on a proportionate share determined by the amounts deposited and the length of time they are deposited. Interest is paid quarterly via a check or warrant. The State keeps an amount for reasonable costs of making the investments, not to exceed one-quarter of one percent of the earnings. The interest rates are fairly high because of the pooling of the State surplus cash with the surplus cash deposited by local governments. This creates a multi -billion dollar money pool and allows diversified investments. In a high interest rate market, we do better than LAIF, but in times of low interest rates, LAIF yields are higher. The City continually invests in the Local Agency Investment Fund (Government Code Section 16429). LOS ANGELES COUNTY POOL INVESTMENT FUND California Government Code ("Government Code") Section 53684 allows local agencies in the County of Los Angeles (the "County") to deposit excess funds in the Los Angeles County Treasury Pool for the purpose of investment by the Treasurer and Tax Collector of the County (the "Treasurer") pursuant to Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The County keeps an amount for reasonable costs of making the investments, not to exceed 16 basis points per month. The number of monthly transactions are not restricted. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: That an annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Hermosa Beach has been filed by the City Treasurer for calendar year 1992 in compliance with Section 53646 (A) of the Government Code of the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF JANUARY 1992. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY January 16, 1992 Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the City Council January 28, 1992 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Recommendation It is recommended that the council adopt the attached resolution relative to the Annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Hermosa Beach for the year 1992. This policy is the same as the council adopted in 1991. On January 1, 1985 the governor signed Chapter 1226 legislation into law requiring that local public agencies file an Annual Statement of Investment Policy. The 1992 Hermosa Beach City Treasurer's investment policy will comply with Government Code Section 53600 thru 53659, which governs municipal investments in the State of California. The California Government Code provides a large menu of legally allowed public fund investment opportunities. I have attempted to tailor this investment policy to reflect the council's investment personality, while continuing to strive for maximum return on investment funds. Safety of principle is my first priority. I am pleased to announce that our 1991 investment portfolio has generated $966,952.25. This year I have requested authorization to invest in: 1. Time Certificates of Deposit 2. U.S. Treasury Bills, Notes, and Bonds 3. Bankers Acceptances 4. California State Local Agency Investment Fund 5. Los Angeles County Pool Investment Fund le The attached 1992 investment policy resolution is respectfully submitted for your review. Respectfully submitted, -Z7°I. Gary L. B u sch City Treasurer NOTED: Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT AND FILING OF THE ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE YEAR 1992 WHEREAS, the California State Legislature passed legislation during the 1984 session requiring the filing of an annual Statement of Investment Policy by local public agencies; and WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of California signed such legislation into law effective January 1, 1985 (Chapter 1226); and WHEREAS, the City Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach declares the annual Statement of Investment Policy to be as follows: PURPOSE: This statement is intended to provide a guideline for the prudent investment of temporary idle cash, trust funds and restricted monies and to outline a policy for maximizing the efficiency of the cash management system. Ultimate investment goals include the enhancement of economic status and the protection of pooled cash investments. OBJECTIVE: The cash management system of the City of Hermosa Beach is designed to accurately monitor and forecast expenditures and revenues, thus insuring the investment of monies to the fullest extent possible. Attempts to obtain highest interest yields possible are statement of fact as long as investments meet the criteria required for safety and liquidity. POLICY: The City of Hermosa Beach operates its investment program with State and self-imposed constraints. It does not buy stocks; it does not speculate; it does not deal in futures, options or security loan agreements. Longer term investments (over one year) are generally limited to maturities of 3 years or less, but will never exceed five years. Criteria for selecting investments and the absolute order of priority are: 1. Safety 2. Liquidity 3. Yield 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The City's investment philosophy is to insure the safety of principle and to provide money when needed. A high dollar yield on investments, though important, ranks third in the priority of investment strategy. Depository Services Money must be deposited in state or national banks, state or federal savings associations, or state or federal credit unions in the state. It may be in inactive deposits, active deposits or interest-bearing active deposits. The deposits cannot exceed the amount of the bank's or savings and loan's paid up capital and surplus. We require that each financial institution submit current financial statements which are evaluated prior to the investment of funds. We use the following criteria: The institution must have been in business at least three years. The institution must submit audited financial statements. In addition, examination is made of the Reserve for Loan Losses category to evaluate the financial trend of the institution's asset base. Whenever possible, the use of several years' financial data is evaluated to present a trend of activity in the institution. We also require that interest be paid to the City on a monthly basis (current state law only requires quarterly payment). Authorized Investments Generally, investments shall be made in the context of "prudent man" rule, which states that, "investments shall be made with judgement and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived." The City is further governed by the California Government Code, Sections 53600 et seq. Within the context of these limitations, the following investments are authorized, as further limited herein: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TCD's (Time Certificates of Deposits) which are insured for $100,000 by FDIC or FSLIC or fully collateralized as required by state law if over $100,000 are purchased. Not more than 5% of the City's portfolio is invested in any one insitu- tion. Time Certificates of Deposits are safekept in a legally acceptable safekeeping account. An institution must meet the following criteria to be considered by the City: 1. The institution must be located in California. 2. The institution must have current financial information, signed contract and waiver on file with the City. 3. The institution must maintain a net worth to asset ratio of at least 5%, and have a positive earnings record. 4. The institution must be at least 3 years old. 5. For collateralized investments, the institution must have at least $100 million in assets. Acceptable collateral is 110% of the public fund account in government securities. U. 8. TREASURY's are direct obligations of the United States Government. U.S. TBILLS are issued weekly with maturity dates up to one year. They are issued and traded on a discount basis and the interest is figured on a 360 day basis, actual number of days. They are issued in amounts of $10,000 and up, in multiples of $5,000. They are a highly liquid security. U.B. TNOTES are initially issued with two to ten year maturities. They are actively traded in a large secondary market and are very liquid. The Treasury may issue note issues with a minimum of $5,000. BANKERS ACCEPTANCES are negotiable time drafts drawn to finance the export, import, shipment or storage of goods, and they are termed "Accepted" when a bank guarantees to pay the face value at maturity. A Banker's Acceptance constitutes an irrevocable obligation of the accepting bank and a contingent obligation of the drawer and of any endorsees whose names appear upon it. The bank is protected by its customer's agreement to provide the necessary funds in advance of the maturity of the Acceptance and also by the pledge of documents such as bills of lading, independent warehouse of terminal receipts, and other documents evidencing ownership and the insurance of the goods so financed. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Cities and other local agencies are authorized to purchase Banker's Acceptances subject to several restrictions. First, the Banker's Acceptance must be eligible for purchase by. Federal Reserve Systems. Second, purchases of Banker's Acceptances must not exceed two hundred seventy (270) days' maturity or 40% of the City's surplus money invested under Sections 53601 and/or 53635. Finally, no more than 5% of the agency's surplus funds may be invested in the Banker's Acceptances of any one commercial bank (Government Code Sections 53601(f), 53635(f). LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND is a special fund in the State Treasury which local agencies may use to deposit funds for investment. There is no minimum investment period and the minimum transaction is $5,000, in multiples of $1,000 above that, with a maximum of $5,000,000 for any agency. The City is restricted to a maximum of eight transactions per month. It offers high liquidity because deposits can be converted to cash in twenty-four hours and no interest is lost. All interest is distributed to those agencies participating on a proportionate share determined by the amounts deposited and the length of time they are deposited. Interest is paid quarterly via a check or warrant. The State keeps an amount for reasonable costs of making the investments, not to exceed one-quarter of one percent of the earnings. The interest rates are fairly high because of the pooling of the State surplus cash with the surplus cash deposited by local governments. This creates a multi -billion dollar money pool and allows diversified investments. In a high interest rate market, we do better than LAIF, but in times of low interest rates, LAIF yields are higher. The City continually invests in the Local Agency Investment Fund (Government Code Section 16429). LOS ANGELES COUNTY POOL INVESTMENT FUND California Government Code ("Government Code") Section 53684 allows local agencies in the County of Los Angeles (the "County") to deposit excess funds in the Los Angeles County Treasury Pool for the purpose of investment by the Treasurer and Tax Collector of the County (the "Treasurer") pursuant to Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The County keeps an amount for reasonable costs of making the investments, not to exceed 16 basis points per month. The number of monthly transactions are not restricted. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: That an annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Hermosa Beach has been filed by the City Treasurer for calendar year 1992 in compliance with Section 53646 (A) of the Government Code of the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF JANUARY 1992. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: NtAA4 j eoe CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY January 13, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 28, 1992 SECOND QUARTERLY REPORT OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 1991-1992 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. Background: On June 25, 1991, the City Council adopted the amended FY 91-92 Capital Improvement Program. This is the second quarterly status report for fiscal year 1991-92. There are 27 projects totaling $5,776,343 in budgeted expenditures. Analysis: The report is organized to show the following for each project: - Project description - Project status as of December 31, 1991 - Approved budget - Encumbered funds as of December 31, 1991 - CIP budget page numbers Respectfully submitted, ynn A. Terry Deputy City Engineer Concu .: B�'1 Glickm BI/A1 Director of Public Works o►� Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager 1 11 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The Capital Improvement Program (hereafter referred to as CIP) is a planning tool for short and long-range infrastructure improvement and development. It links Hermosa Beach's General Plan and the fiscal planning process to physical development and the highest priority maintenance needs of the City's facilities and infrastructure. It provides the mechanism for estimating capital requirements, identifying appropriate funding sources, scheduling all capital projects over a fixed period, coordinating the activities of various departments to meet completion target dates, and monitoring and evaluating the progress of capital projects. The CIP is a five year plan of capital related revenues and expenditures that is updated one year at a time. Although the CIP constitutes a five year plan, funds are appropriated only for the upcoming year. The CIP (starting with FY 89-90) is designed to be on-going and continuous. The projects for the following four years are based on future needs and revenues, not appropriations. This plan consists of projects that are major expenditures for a specific plan or design of permanent public improvements such as a building, street, sanitary sewer rehabilitation, acquisition of real property, or major equipment. The purpose of these projects is to: - Implement the General Plan - Preserve public health and safety - Improve the environment - Increase efficient operation of the City - Improve the comfort and enjoyment, of residents. The capital projects included in this document are for the Fiscal Year 1991-1992. The total Capital Improvement Program funding for FY 90-91 was $4.1 million; for FY 91-92, it is $3.0 million. Projects are presented in this document in seven categories and are organized into the following groups: - Street and Safety Improvements - Street Lighting Improvements - Storm Drain Improvements - Sanitary Sewer Improvements - Park Improvements - Public Buildings and Grounds Improvements - General Capital Improvements Summary: This Capital Improvement Program provides a framework for planning, operation and maintenance as well as replacement of existing capital equipment and facilities. The program is intended to address the highest City priorities for improvement and maintenance of the City's infrastructure while reflecting citizens' needs and wishes with regard to shaping their community. PROJECT STATUS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1991 STREET AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS CIP 85-137 FEDERAL AID URBAN (FAU) STREET FUNDS OVERLAY OF VALLEY, ARDMORE AND PROSPECT Description: This project is for the resurfacing of the full length of Valley Drive and Ardmore Avenue, and Prospect Avenue south of Aviation Boulevard. Status: In Progress. On September 25, 1990, City Council entered an agreement with L.A. County for the overlay project. The County completed the design and advertised for bids on January 22, 1991. The contract was awarded on February 19, 1991 to the Shawnan Corporation in the amount of $609,312. The County costs are estimated to be an additional 35%. The contractor started work on June 17, 1991. The construction work on the contract was completed December 6, 1991, excluding the striping. The contractor is having problems with the striping and the white lines will not be completed until some date in January, 1992. FY 91-92 Budget: Outside Funded from County: City Funded: $ 526,000 $ 635,067 City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: $ 635,067 CIP Budget Page: 42 3 CIP 89-141 Description: Status: STREET REHABILITATION This project proposes to rehabilitate asphalt concrete and portland cement concrete streets, City-wide. On Hold. On September 25, 1990, Council reviewed the pavement management system report which evaluated the condition of all City streets. The Public Works staff has prepared a proposed 5 -year schedule of street im-provements in compliance with the report. The budgeted funds for this Fiscal Year may be needed to complete the above overlay project, CIP 85-137; thus this pro-ject is on hold until February, 1992. $68,647 has already been transferred. For FY 91-92, the following streets are targeted for rehabilitation in order of priority: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. STREET 5th St from PCH to Prospect Av Gentry St from 5th St to 3rd St Rhodes St from N end to 18th St 15th St from Prospect to Harper 1st St from PCH to Prospect Av 19th St from PCH to Rhodes St 6th St from Reynolds St to PCH Ocean Dr from 15th P1 to 8th St PMS SUGGESTED REHAB Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction 7th P1 from Prospect Av to Reynolds 8th St from Hermosa Av to PCH 16th Ct from Beach Dr to Hermosa Av Morningside Dr from 26th St to 33rd St Ingleside Dr from 28th St to Longfellow 24th P1 from Ardmore Av to E end Bard St from 8th St to N End 30th P1 from Morningside to W end FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: ,(Transferred to CIP 85-137) CIP Budget Page: 44 CIP 89-142 SIDEWALK REPAIRS Overlay Overlay Overlay Overlay Overlay Overlay Slurry Slurry $ 224,211 $ 68,647 Description: This project is to repair deteriorated sidewalks, drive- ways and curbs at various locations City-wide for safety reasons. Status: COMPLETED. The City has completed the contract on this project. The specifications for this year were approved by City Council on August 13, 1991; the contract was awarded on October 8, 1991 to Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. at a contract cost of $33,500. Construction started on November 1, 1991 and was completed on November 27, 1991. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: CIP Budget Page: 46 4 $ 35,000 $ 33,500 CIP 90-144 REPLACE STRAND WALL AND WALKWAY Description: Preparation of plans & specifications for the following: 1) remove and replace the entire Strand wall along the bikeway from the southern City border to 24th Street; 2) remove and replace the Strand walkway from the southern City border to 9th Street and from 15th Street to 24th Street; 3) repave the bike path from 24th Street to 35th Street; and 4) the extension of the bike path adjacent to Hermosa Avenue from 35th Street to connect with the bike path in Manhattan Beach. Status: In progress. During FY 89-90, staff applied to LACTC to obtain funding through TDA, Article 3, Bicycle/Pedestrian facilities and received funding of $446,000. In FY 90-91, the City received a check in the amount of $405,656 from LACTC. This grant, when added to the $446,000 already received and $200,000 due in FY 1991-92, will be used to repair the Strand pedestrian and bike path. These grants result from Council direction to provide services with costs borne by visitors to the City. By reducing liability and City expense, this grant will improve the financial position of the City. Staff is preparing the engineering plans which are scheduled for Council review in the third quarter. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: CIP Budget Page: 48 CIP 89-146 STREET MEDIAN UPGRADES $ 845,011 $ 2,541 Description: This project proposes new landscaping, plantings, and irrigation for street medians at various locations, City-wide. Status: Project Not Started Yet. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: CIP Budget Page: 52 5 $ 5,000 $ -0- CIP 89-150 MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS Description: Preparation of plans and specifications leading to: 1. New type of traffic signal on Pier Avenue allowing egress and ingress for Fire Department emergency vehicles. 2. Relocation of existing pedestrian crossing at the Valley School parking lot to a new signalized location in front of the school as requested by the School District, thereby allowing school children and pedestrians to cross in a safe manner. Status: In progress. 1. City Traffic Engineer still has safety concerns about the safe placement and operation of a fire truck -activated signal. Expect concerns to be addressed by March, 1992. 2. The County contractor for CIP 89-137 has recon- structed the pathway on the Greenbelt at no cost to the City and the City is to install the pedestrian crossing signal. The pedestrian crossing signal equipment is on order and will be installed as soon as it is received. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: CIP Budget Page: 58 CIP 89-151 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING PROGRAM $ 20,000 $ 11,801 Description: The following work is proposed: 1. Develop a high accident location and surveillance program using traffic accident data. 2. Conduct a study and develop a detailed residential neighborhood traffic control plan to reduce commuter traffic intrusion. Status: In Progress. A Grant application was submitted to the State for project funding. On March 12th, 1991, Council approved an agreement with the State for a $40,000 project covering a study identifying high accident locations. A Request for Proposals has been prepared and solicitation is in accordance with the newly adopted Council policy regarding professional services. The State has notified the City, however, that no contract can be signed until after January, 1992. FY 91-92 Budget: $ 40,000 City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: $ -0- CIP Budget Page: 60 6 CIP 91-165 BIKEWAY PATH REPAIRS Description: This project provides for the following: - Preliminary engineering leading to construction - Right-of-way acquisition - Construction and reconstruction - Repair and maintenance (off street bikeways only) - Purchase & installation of features such as benches, drinking fountains, and bicycle racks. Status: In Progress. During FY 91-92, staff is accumulating funding from the State Gas Tax Fund and through the Transportation Development Act, Article 3. This project is to be combined with the Strand recon- struction project. FY 91-92 Budget: $ 17,545 City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: $ -0- CIP Budget Page: 62 CIP 89-170 SLURRY SEALING Description: This project is to provide slurry sealing on asphalt surfaced streets west of Valley Drive to increase skid resistance and prolong pavement life. The work includes crack sealing and spot repairs before the slurry sealing. Status: COMPLETED. The slurry seal contract was awarded by the City on March 26, 1991. Asphalt Maintenance Company of California had the contract to perform the work at a cost not to exceed $300,000. Inspection and contract administration were performed by Tierra Engineering Company at a cost not to exceed $22,342. Funding for the project is 100% from the State Gas Tax Fund. The contractor started work on May 31, 1991 and completed work on August 22, 1991. FY 90-91 and FY 91-92 Total Project construction funds spent: Total Project inspection funds spent: Other Project costs: TOTAL COSTS: FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: CIP Budget Page: 64 7 $ 299,968 $ 22,342 $ 8,112 $ 330,422 $ 229,321 $ 228,735 CIP 89-176 TRAFFIC CONTROL PRE-EMPTION Description: This project will install traffic control pre-emption devices on all PCH signals at: 2nd Street Aviation Blvd. 5th Street 8th Street Pier Avenue 21st Street Status: In Progress. On December 13, 1990, the South Bay Hospital District agreed to pay, after the project is completed, up to on half of the total cost of a not to exceed amount of $70,000. Staff submitted plans and specifications to Caltrans in May, 1991 for encroach- ment permit approval. The City received permit approval from Caltrans on August 21, 1991. The project is scheduled to begin construction in January, 1992. FY 91-92 Proposed Budget: $ 70,468 (unfunded) City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: $ -0- CIP Budget Page: 66 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS CIP 88-201 STREET LIGHT UPGRADES Description: This project proposes the installation, upgrading and conversion to high pressure sodium lights throughout the City. Status: In Progress. The streetlight poles on the,Strand are in the way of the sweeper and the staff is redesigning the location of the poles into the new Strand wall. FY 91-92 Budget: $ 22,000 City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: $ -0- CIP Budget Page: 70 8 SEWERS/STORM DRAINS CIP 90-301 MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS Description: This project proposes to repair or modify existing storm drains within the City. Status: Project Not Started Yet. During this fiscal year, staff will be making an identification and condition assessment. FY 91-92 Proposed Cost: $ 50,000 (unfunded) City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: $ -0- CIP Budget Page: 72 CIP 88-406 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, TARGET AREA 4 Description: Construction and completion of deficiencies in the sanitary sewers of Target Area 4, the last locations indicated as priority No. 1 within the Santina & Thompson report. Status: COMPLETED. On December 11, 1990, City Council awarded a 180 calendar day construction contract to Colich and Sons in the amount of $1,587,648. The inspection contract was awarded to BSI at a cost not to exceed $62,320 (based on 120 days). That amount was increased to $92,750 (based on 180 days) by the City Council on August 13, 1991. Approximately 11,800 feet of sanitary sewer was rehabilitated at 18 separate locations in the City. Approximately 50% of the sewer was replaced with new clay pipe'. The remaining 50% was lined with polyethelyne liner. The project was funded primarily through the 6% Utility Users Tax Fund. Construction work started on March 8, 1991 and was completed on October 31, 1991. The total cost of $1,441,657.98 was $145,990.02 under budgeted construction costs. During the first few months of the contract, the City experienced failure in three (3) of the locations scheduled for rehabilitation. Final payment has not yet been made. FY 91-92 Budget: • $1,138,428 City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: $ 728,672 CIP Budget Page: 74 9 PARK IMPROVEMENTS CIP 89-506 VARIOUS PARK IMPROVEMENTS Description: The improvements include new tree planting, benches, landscaping, irrigation, playground equipment, picnic tables, etc. recommended for locations to be determined by the Community Resources Commission. Status: In progress. The following projects from fiscal year 1990-91 are being worked on at this time: 1. $1000 to purchase storage shed; installation is to take place after environmental review. 2. Roofing for the 6th and Prospect historical school building has been completed. The repair of the walls and ceiling is now also completed. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: CIP Budget Page: 78 $ 20,000 $ 6,459 CIP 88-508 PARK IRRIGATION REHABILITATION Description: Restoration of various City Park irrigation systems. Status: Not Started Yet. Existing systems have been evaluated and the design is scheduled to begin work in the 3rd Quarter of FY 1991-92. FY 91-92 Budget: $ ..66,000 City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: $ -0- CIP Budget Page: 80 10 CIP 89-509 TENNIS COURTS RESURFACING Description: This project proposes to resurface the six tennis courts at the Community Center. Existing cracks would be filled and an acrylic coating would be applied to the playing surface. Status: On Hold. Deferred to avoid any conflict with City Yard relocation. FY 91-92 Proposed Cost: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: CIP Budget Page: 82 CIP 89-510 IMPLEMENTATION OF PARK MASTER PLAN $ 20,000 (unfunded) $ -0- Description: This project proposes to implement the Park Master Plan by adding new plantings, benches, landscaping, trash cans, signage, etc. as approved by City Council as well as other recommendations from the PRCRAC. Status: On Hold. This project is on hold pending the outcome of the South School acquisition. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91 CIP Budget Page: 84 CIP 90-511 RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PARKING LOT $ -0- $ -0- Description: Install a tree -lined and landscaped parking lot on the railroad right-of-way area between Valley & Ardmore across from City Hall. The design to emphasize the Greenbelt theme and the pedestrian path. Status: In progress. The conceptual design is under study. Five colored renderings are to be sent to the Parks Commission for input and review. The conceptual designs will then be reviewed by the Planning Commission before final design approval by the City Council. Staff is currently working with the West Basin Municipal Water District to get the best type of landscaping to reduce water irrigation needs. FY 91-92 Budget: $ 111,500 City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91 $ -0- CIP Budget Page: 86 11 CIP 89-513 PURCHASE OF 5 LOTS ADJACENT TO EDITH RODAWAY PARR Description: Purchase 5 lots adjacent to Edith Rodaway Park, located between Gentry Street and Hollowell Avenue, bordering the north side of Prospect Avenue. The park will be expanded and developed on the adjacent vacant lots. Status: PURCHASE COMPLETED. Escrow closed on this project on March 15, 1991. The following activities have been identified as part of the expansion and development phase and are scheduled to be completed by May 1, 1992. 1. Topographic survey of additional park area - DONE 2. Design of recreational use areas 3. Grading of site 4. Instalation of irrigation system 5. Installation of fencing 6. Planting of trees, shrubs and grass 7. Purchase of table and installation of picnic areas 8. Opening of park addition to the public FY 91-92 Budget: $ 50,000 City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91 $ -0- CIP Budget Page: 88 CIP 89-515 PURCHASE SOUTH SCHOOL Description: Purchase school property located 300 feet south of 6th Street, west of Valley Drive. This site is one of two proposed sites for the new Public Works Yard. Status: In Progress. The property was surveyed and the Record of Survey Map was submitted to the Los Angeles County Surveyor in December, 1991 for review. The City staff is reviewing the preliminary title report and escrow is proposed to close on January 10, 1992. FY 91-92 Budget: $ 2,240,000 City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91 $ 201,040 CIP Budget Page: 92 12 PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS CIP 89-604 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS Description: This project proposes rehabilitation of the wooden floors at the following locations: 1. Clark Building floor 2. Community Center gym floor 3. Community Center stage floor Status: In Progress. Staff is preparing a bid package for the subject work at the above locations. Bids are to be received by the City Council during the third quarter. FY 91-92 Budget: $ 17,533 City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: $ 488 CIP Budget Page: 98 CIP 91-608 CITY YARD RELOCATION Description: This project proposes the relocation of the Public Works maintenance yard in anticipation of oil drilling. This project does not include the cost of land acquisition. Status: On Hold., On September 25, 1990, Council awarded a feasibility study to Anthony/Langford to analyze two proposed Public Works Yard relocation sites, at a cost not to exceed $21,000. Activity is pending the results of negotiations with the oil driller. FY 91-92 Proposed Cost: $ 21,000 (unfunded) City Encumbered. Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: .$ -0- CIP Budget Page: 100 CIP 89-609 MODULAR FURNITURE/COUNCIL CHAIRS Description: Plans, specifications and estimates for proposed modular furniture = $ 25,000; and new Council chairs = $ 5,000. Status: On Hold. ,Staff is reviewing the purchase of the modular furniture and the new Council chairs. Review and approval by the City Council will be required prior to any expenditure of funds. FY 91-92 Budget: $ 30,000 City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91 $ -0- CIP Budget Page: 102 13 CIP 89-613 COMMUNITY CENTER ELECTRICAL UPGRADE Description: Prepare plans and specifications leading to upgrading electrical services at the Community Center Buildings to meet current Code requirements. Status: On Hold. City Council placed project on hold and directed Department of Building & Safety to make an electrical analysis study. FY 91-92 Proposed Cost: $ -0- (unfunded) City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: $ -0- CIP Budget Page: 106 CIP 89-615 COMMUNITY CENTER FIRE ALARMS Description: This project, to replace the old existing fire alarm system at the Community Center, was recommended by the Fire Department. The new system is connected to the 911 dispatch desk in the Police Department. Status: COMPLETED. The total budgeted amount for FY 90-91 through FY 91-92 for this project was $10,000, of which, $9,896 was spent for equipment and materials. The installation of the totally new fire alarm system was completed by City staff and the activation date was on September 25, 1991. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: CIP Budget Page: 107A $ 374 $ 270 CIP 90-616 EARTHQUAKE REINFORCEMENT OF CLARK BUILDING Description: This project proposes to install a structural steel framework within the Clark Building to comply with current earthquake code requirements due by 1995. Status: In progress. The Building Department and the Public Works Department are preparing an estimate of costs to upgrade the existing structure to meet present needs and codes. This estimate will then be compared to the cost of a new structure. The results will be provided to the City Council for review in the third quarter. FY 91-92 Budget: $ 45,000 City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: $ -0- CIP Budget Page: 108 14 CIP 89-617 MUNICIPAL PIER ENTRANCE RESTORATION Description: This project proposes to restore and renovate the Municipal Pier entrance at the Strand. Status: In Progress. The Coastal Conservancy has contracted with the firm of Moffat and Nichols to prepare a preliminary design/cost report. Their report is scheduled for completion in March 1992; it will be coordinated with R/UDAT. FY 91-92 Proposed Cost: $ -0- (unfunded) City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: $ -0- CIP Budget Page: 110 GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS CIP 89-701 CITY PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS Description: Upgrade City parking lots to include repairing pavement and walls, parking bumpers and new planting. Status: On Hold. A portion of the project will include work within the VPD. The VPD will provide input regarding the 3 downtown parking lots "A", "B" and "C". FY 91-92 Budget: $ 15,000 City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 12/31/91: $ -0- CIP Budget Page: 112 15 PROJECT N0. PROJECT DESCRIPTION STREETS & SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS • 85-137 Overlay Valley, Ardmore S Prospect 89.141 Street Rehabilitation • 89-142 Sidewalk Repairs 90-144 Replace Strand Wall i Walkway 89-146 Street Median Upgrades 89-150 Misc. Traffic Signal Improv. 90-151 Traffic Engineering Program 91-165 Misc. Bikeway Construction • 89-170 Slurry Sealing 86-176 Traffic Control Pre-emption - STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS 88.201 Street Lighting Upgrades AMOUNT 1 JUL 1 AUG FUNDED 1,161,067 CITY OF NERVOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY91-92 1 SEP I OCT 1 NOV 1 DEC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1--1-- -- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 JAM 1 FEB 1 MAR 1 APR 1 MAY 1 JUN 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 1111111111111111 1111111111111111 1111111111111111111111 111111 1111111 III 224,211 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-'r•ti-1-+ -+ 35,00° Folmel BlImN«ml•+ -1 + 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 845,011 + } } 5,000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111111111111111111211 1 1 1 1 20,000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 40,000 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 17,545 229,321 4- 70,468^ +1••4.--11211.111.111111111.1111M11111 22,000 1•• }- 22,000 STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 90-301 Misc. Storm Drain Improvements 50,000 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS • 88-406 Target Area 4 PARKS IMPROVEMENTS 89-506 88-508 89-509 90-510 91-511 89.513 89-515 Various Park Improv. Park Irrigation Tennis Court Resurfacing Implement Park Mester Plan Railroad ROW Parking Lot Purchase of 5 Lots for Park 1,138,428 20,000 66,000 I +++-+-4-1_ 20,000 1 I I 1 I I I I I I of 111111111 111,500 50,000 Purchase South School 2,240,000 PUBLIC BUILDINGS i GROUNDS IMPROVEMENTS 89-604 Various Building Improv. 17,533 91-608 Public Works Yard 0 89-609 Modular Furn. / Council Chairs 30,000 89-613 Comm. Center Electrical Upgrade 0 89-615 Comm. Ctr. Fire Alern Sys. 384 90-616 Clark Bldg. Earthquake Reinf. 45,000 90-617 Municipal Pier Restoration 0 GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 89-701 City Parking Lot Improvements 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 111111111111111111 1-1-1-4 - -1. -11•1•11.11=1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I IImlimlmlnimimlmimilmilmi- -1-+- ++4-4-4- 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1111111'1111111111111 15,000 1 -I. tiortimi1m1m118,00.4mk COMPLETED PROPOSAL DESIGN LEGEND 8100180 CONSIRUCTIO8 REVISED AS OF 12/31/91 January 14, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 28, 1992 RELEASE OF CITY LIEN ON PROPERTY AT 514 24th STREET Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Accept the cash deposit provided to the City in lieu of the existing lien on the property at 514 24th Street. 2. Approve the Release of Lien Agreement for the subject property. 3. Authorize the Mayor -to sign the Release of Lien Agreement. 4. Authorize the Release of Lien Agreement to be recorded with the County Recorder. Background: In consideration of the deferment of street improvements as required by Ordinance No. N.S. 235 of the City, the property owners at 514 24th Street signed a Lien Agreement with the City of Hermosa Beach. That agreement was recorded on October 22, 1986, as Instrument No. 86-1425258 for the purpose of providing security relating to the installation of the required improvements. (A copy of the recorded Lien Agreement is attached for reference.) Analysis: The property owners wish to refinance the loan on their property. However, the lender has required that the recorded Lien Agreement on the property be removed prior to any refinancing. -Therefore, the property owners have provided a cash deposit to the City as a guarantee for the construction of the required street improvements. The City Engineer has executed a Cash Deposit Agreement for and on behalf of the City as authorized by Resolution No. N.S. 2470 of the City of Hermosa Beach. (A copy of the Cash Deposit Agreement is attached for reference.) To,remove the Lien on the subject property, the City Council must either require the construction or accept the cash deposit in lieu of the required construction and approve the release of the Lien. The Lien Release'must be signed by the Mayor and be recorded at the County Recorder's office. (A copy of the Release of Lien Agreement is attached for reference.) - 1 - 1g The property owners need to complete the refinancing of their new loan by the end of the month. Due to the time limits of the loan, the staff recommends that this request be approved. However, the staff recommends that in the future no further lien agreements be approved in lieu of constructing the public improvements for this property. The file on this property includes the following: 3-24-84 LIEN AGREEMENT for the deferment of public street improvements. (recorded February 4, 1985, as instrument #85-133708) 7-9-85 Cash Deposit Agreement for the guarantee of public street improvements. 7-18-85 City received Cash Deposit (Receipt # D27767) 8-5-85 Release of Lien Agreement (Recorded Sept., 25, 1985, as instrument #85-1119183) 8-19-85 LIEN AGREEMENT for the deferment of public street improvements. (Recorded August 20, 1985, as instrument #85-962659) 8-20-85 Refund of Cash Deposit to City)received 7-18-85. (P.O.#15508, Warrant #18043) 7-23-86 Cash Deposit agreement for the guarantee of public street improvements. 7-23-86 City received Cash Deposit (Receipt #10173) 7-28-86 Release of Lien Agreement (Recorded July 31, 1986, as instrument #86-975730) 10-21-86 LIEN AGREEMENT for the deferment of public street improvements. (Recorded Oct. 22, 1986, as instrument #86-1425258) 11-17-86 Refund of Cash Deposit to City)received 7-23-86. (P.O. #15568, Warrant #21846) 1-13-92 Cash Deposit Agreement for the guarantee of public street improvements. 1-13-92 City received Cash Deposit (Receipt #26048) 1-28-92 Release of Lien Agreement Alternatives: 1. Accept the cash deposit in lieu of the required improvements and approve the release of the Lien. 2. Do not accept the cash deposit and require the improvements to be constructed at this time. 3. Do not accept the cash deposit and require the Lien to continue on the property. Respectfully submitted, Concur: Lynn Terry v lliam Glickman, Interim Deputy City Engineer pworks/ccsrlien Director of Public Works Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager CASH DEPOSIT AGREEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the following Agreement is made and entered into this 13th day of .January, 1992, by and between Roger Harrell and Margaret Harrell Now residing at: 514 24th Street hereinafter referred to as "Owner" and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", said Owner being the owner of real property situated in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, described as follows: to wit: Lot 18, Block 2, Hermosa Terrace Tract, as recorded in Book 10, Page 16 of Maps, in Office of the County Recorder, County of Los Angeles, State of California (AKA: 514 24th Street) WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. N.S. 235 of the City of Hermosa Beach, the Owner, by reason of causing the construction of a building or dwelling upon his property, is required to install or cause the installation of 30 lineal feet of curb, gutter, sidewalk and required street pavement. WHEREAS, Section 5 of said Ordinance provides that any person required to make certain improvements may make a cash deposit with the City to guarantee construction of said improvements, said deposit being determined by the City Engineer as that sum necessary to cover the cost of construction and installation of said improvements, and WHEREAS, the owner desires not to make the required improvements, but to make a cash deposit with the City to guarantee the construction of said improvements, and WHEREAS, the City is willing to accept the cash deposit in lieu of the actual construction as required by the provisions of said Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE BE IT AGREED 1. That the owner, by depositing the sum of $1,500.00 with the City of Hermosa Beach, is relieved of the requirements for immediate installation of certain improvements, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. N.S. 235 of said City, as a condition for final approval of buildings or dwellings by the Building Inspector. 2. That the City may at its option, construct and install the required improvements or delay said construction until such time as it may deem best in the interests of the City. 3. That if the owner, desires to construct and install the required imrpovements at any time prior to any construction of said improvements by the City, the sum of $1,500.00 shall be returned to said owner upon satisfactory completion of the improvements, or shall be credited to him in the event of a neighborhood voluntary cash contribution improvement program. 4. That in the event of the formation of a special assessment district for the purpose of constructing street and sidewalk improvements, said district including the property hereinbefore described, the property owner of record at such time will be credited with the sum of $1,500.00 toward the assessment charges levied against said property. 5. That the provisions of this agreement shall inure to the parties hereto, their heirs, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has by Resolution No. N.S. 2470 of its City Council, adopted at its meeting on February 19, 1963, authorized this Agreement to be executed for and on behalf of the* City by the City Engineer and attested by its City Clerk. Executed By ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ctz:6j J•vcQ City Attorney pworks/cashdep CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH W iam Glickman, Interim Di ector of Public Works OWNER(s) Roger H4 rell // Margart Harrell WHEN RECORDED, PLEASE RETURN TO: Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RELEASE OF LIEN AGREEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the Lien entered into by Roger Harrell and Margaret Harrell claimed by the City of Hermosa Beach upon the following described property, to wit: Lot 18, Block 2, Hermosa Terrace Tract, as recorded in book 10, Page 16 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder, County of Los Angeles, State of California. (AKA 514 24th Street) as authorized by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, is hereby released. That certain lien recorded as Document No. 86-1425258 on October 22, 1986, of Official Records, as recorded in the Recorder's Office of Los Angeles County, State of California, is hereby satisfied and discharged. Dated: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA By Kathleen Midstokke, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) ( // •cue ClEy Attorney On January 28, 1992, before me, Elaine Doerfling, the undersigned, Notary Public of said County and State, personally appeared Kathleen Midstokke, known to me to be the Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, and known to me to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of said public corporation herein named, and acknowledged to me that such public corporation executed the same. Notary Public in and for the County of Los Angeles pworks/relien CU (7 Crayrr' d • • • —02 Ot:Ag lc) -22 n CIT:' OF HERMOSA BEACH 86; 6 1.425258 iif.YAftE 1N U�ft'tA! Ra `K,.ORUfR`, OPFICr Lp9 J�IVr,,ti,t.C:i C417NiY ilh n Reesrdrg 11twtlAe M,�i i t�c?l CALIF'UftNIA -IKathleon Midatokka, City C1ecM' ;: MIN' 1GA.N,�1G'1f ail i Civic Center Pte'' eir City Nail !�02"r4 r, '�,2�1t? % }larmora Beach, California rr ----,TEN AORr.1iCNT f �'u r )THIS LIEN AGREEMENT, made and entered into this Y4th,„_ day of 1 (� 190G by and brtwe nn t r �' / l4ergarct H. Harrell and j;r H. Harrel ---s--- ----- . ---.-.— �NO''i PCSIt>XN(1 AT: 514-. 24th Strt2ot iicrmoa u ! CA 4-�---• . ; t-4 Z'd hereinafter After referr'ec to as "0'dnor.(a)", and the C1T`; OF HMMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation, County of Los Angeles, Stot,e of California, hereinafter referred to as "City". W 1 T N E S S 1 r H: That in connideration of the waiver and deferment af'the require- ment or installing or causing Co bo installed certain improve- ments it accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. N.S. 239 of said City, the Owner door+ hereby expressly grant unto the City r lion upon tont real property situated in the City of Hermosa Bosch, County of Loa Angeles, State of California, described at follows), tau -wit: (Legal description and street sddrete of prop- l.ot 11Block ?r HermosaTerrace Tract as recorded tarty subjtwt to Tian) • County, commonly known a 24theit, kermess.^� Bench, CA 94254 including all buildings end improvements thereba on, or thatmty be erected on said pramiaeni together with all (}'7E pgCOnDINc 18 nEQUI•.5'TDD 1.11. ANT 'l0 OOVT. CODC S 6103 - 1UitVEFIASACtT 1, AHi i! Gitorr 1 us), ..astNrH� OF '1'nn ciTy or �1„ F( Wti217: E0 2E, 02 Ntif 2'd \.40.14:114Wk1 0lrA} N/.d41;1;,;/Ll',lialiMetit'i.�A+..... �r.cJVR.AWJ4.c.�0.14 miIidG1o+.1►YYD .144. 1:aJM'ww..-aT4 appurtenances thereunto helnnt;lrgr, or in Any wine appertaining, tins• the reacrvatiang. remainders, runt!!, iIaUgp And pr.r,ftt.a thereof, As security for the faithful performance of All germs, tonditi'l!t» end covenants of that certain improvement agreement hereinafter let forth, gold improvement agreement providing for the installa- tion of certain improvements in connection with the above dee:ribed real property' said }len hereby granted further secur- ing any end all advancer or expenditures required by the City to be made in causing the inshallation of said iatprovementn in the event the $Arne shall not bo ino to l lcd by the Owner i n hereinafter provided in paid improvement agreement, together with all advan- ces required to be atado by the City in paying Tions };rior to this Agreement, taxes and esannsmenta, i f any, :mt./icon performed in the caro ef,seid premises, premium for fire insurance on build- ings, and in case of default And for,acloouve searching of the title therefor, fats for legal cervices, anaesnmentn and coats of suit, and cl1 liabilities incurred for, the protection of the in- debtedness secured until thn ,"nate is fully paid, the naid agree- ment relating to the installation of raid improvements hereby being in words and figures as follows, to -wit: 1.00% of the total estimated cost of the improvement in Tll8 SUM OFs„ r, ' shed 11ars — $ 6no 0oo.r. 1Mp'H(aVRltt;HT ACRES ENT WHEREAS, Section 4 of ordinance No, N,S. 23'i of the City of Bair.• moan ttrs':h, County of Los Angeles, dente or California, proviciea • 2 - 86-1425258 wh77: F,(2.1 PA, 1717 tiJH f that tiny person required to Natal' or cause to be snot10.1cd curb and Kurter find/or aidownik imprt►vementu under the provieio+a.. of Section 1 of said ordinanLa maty delay said 1natnllnrton l; there in lege than 35% of curb and/or eidewelk installed on the game side of ;be ►+treat in the block of which the property is pe.t, or if the City engineer determines that the street grnde connet readily be ettabliahad or that the street for practical reasons has not been grnued to an established grade which would enable proper lccation of curbs, gutters and/or niduwelkn, provided the property owner signs an agreement with acid City that acid owner will Construct: curb and gutter and or sidewalks when 35'1 of the footage on the same Fide of the street within hie block shell havu curb and gutter, and/or sidewalks installed or agreed to he metalled, or when the City Engineer determines that the street grade has been suft'icleht:ly established or that the street has been sufficiently graded to an eatebliebed grads which wot'ld per- mit the proper location of turns, iuttora and/or a d('walk5, and acid Owner shell souse to be recorded n real property lien egoinet the property to secure the perfermanc' the agreement, and, WHEREAS, the undersigned fella within the provisions r,f said Set- tics x of Ordinance No. N.S. 235 of the City of 1;ermoee heath and desires to take advantage of Geld deferment or delay provisions of Section 4 of said orainenco in connection with Che inetall!s- tion of eai1 improvemenca: NOW. THEREFORE, the undersigned, in consideretien of the defer- ment and daisy hereby granted by the City of Hermosa heath in -3- E'd 8G-1425258 1.1H2b:RP 7R, r? HHr +f •. X7t A,l,. `.'i+t.. :�1..��:.�...w.�s::vi:�alL�.:c w...w:n..J • connection with the lstatallation of curb and gutter and/or aide - walk along the at1•rt.et abutting that property (inscribed In the within lien agreement do hereby agree, promise and covensant with the nity of 'larattosa Beach us follows, to -wit: f That at such time as there uhull hove been constructed unci in- stalled or agreed to be constructed and installed, curb and gut- ters anu;or sidewalks covering 35% n. the footage within the block And on the some side of the street as said revel property herein described ia,aituatcd, or at such time that the City En- gineer determines that the street grade has been sufficiently established or that the ttreet has been sufficiently grrdnd to nn catab.liahed grade which would permit the proper )ovation of curbs, gutters and/or sidewalks, the undersigned do hereby agree to construct and install Curb and gutter and/or sidnwolks, eloag the street abutting that real property hereinabove described in said lien Agreement. II That said curb end gutter and/or sidewalks shell be constructed And installed in accordance with the gradc eastasbliehed by the office of the City Engineer of the City of Hermosa Beach, and shall be in sccordencp with plans And specificotiona on file in veld o£f.le, and shall be constructed and installed under the aaupervieion of the City Engineer of said City. III 86-14 • if I.11-Ir-1-..Cfi ?C r1' 111--11^ C• -I That in the event the undersigned shall tail, refuse, or neglect to co►.ip1y with any term. covcneet or provinion heroin conteinod, the City of ttertnosa Beach may, nt its elettioe, c:onetrurt and install said curb and gutter anal/or sidewalks nt it.s own cost and r.xpenee, follewinp ten days written ttoti.ce to said undcrnignect. That in the event the undersigned shall have failed, refuted -or neglected to reimburse the City of Hormone %/act, for all nests incurred by amid City in the construction and inntelJaticn of said curb and gutter and/or sidewalk improvemynts 's heroin pro- vided, or to have made arrangements satisfactory to the City En- gineer of said City in connection with said reimbursement, the holder Of said improvement agreement secured hereby, le au- thorixed and may elect, SUBJECT ONLY to the provisions of law in connection therewith, co do tho following ACC or uctfl, and ins by the execution hereof empowered to do paid following act or Acts; Ca) That upon default by the Owner, the holder of this agreesicnt is hereby authorized and empowered to serve written notice on said Owner of said default, together with the declaration and Demand that said proper::,- be sold and of election to cause to bo sold geoid property. After the lapse of such time vs may be reiuireJ by fol- lowing the law applicable to the sale of real property after the default on the Trutt Geed and after notice of ea1d lisle has been given in the manner required by the law cf Truer, Deeds. The holder of thin egr.eement is then empowered to sell geld property at the time and place fixed in aafd notice of sale, et ;tubus; auction to the highr,nt bidder. Any person includ:ng the Owner, and 86-2425258 I.IL.,+-i-r.cfn 7C M7 AII-Ar undnrnip,n*d, may purchase at anld 411101 (b) To procure insurance on the buildings for the benefit of said City; (e) To enter upon the premises, if t',utleced or abandoned, to care for and cultivate the same; (d) To pay all lions or encumbrances Cher rro.prfor to this agreement, including all tax and assessments upon said premises; (e) To advance money for any purpose, necessary to prc)ttcc said premises; (f) To commence sn action to foreclose this agreement and lier when any ohligation or money secured hereby is dug, owing and payable under the terns hereof; (g) That as additional security, the Owner and undersigned hereby confers upon the holder of this agreemr.rt, duting the continuation thereof, and in the *vent of default thereunder, the richt to collect the rcpt s, issues and profits of said property, and tu rr.tnin the some to the extant required to antiafy (sold agreement. IV The said Owner and undersigned covenants And agrees; that he hen a tele ti.1, lo and to said property free and clear of ail en- cutabrancea, except those stated in writing to the City; that said Owner will not permit rhe existence of any lien prior to Chita agreement unless herein expressly mentioned; that said Owner will pay ail tsxeo and ansesasnents levied upon the premises described herein; end that. said Owner will keep all buildings innured for -6- S6 S6-1425258 �. .�ie.�:• 4; .,: i 4i.! C!Aa'AJevY4�:tidJ1:'uf� : citiif �.iitiiF�•a ti.+.%e'i7JAi:Cy t='L: the benefit of the City in u num not loan than the tassonnble value thereof plod 100% of the total estimated cont of the fur• • ^*, proveasent in the num of Six itundred ,�,_......—..,1k1115 s -----�^--... $64'x'" required to be vide in tset:ordfnme with the provisions thereof. V Ther this egretmetlt mrd lion ie executcsd for the purpose, of securing and puarttntcnir.g thn construction rnd'inato:lotion of an improvement, to -wits Curb and gutter and/or sidewalk, which has nn estimated L.'out of _Six Hundred gallant $d0000. that the Owner shell be leaseerfrom the provisions hereof and n satisfaction of lien caused to he filed upon deposition IOn'/, of the total estimated coat of the improvement with the City the num of Sir la0o11ar3 $ �OO.a�0,,,___,,-'.� Katd sum hying deposited for purposes of covering the coot': of Cha construction and ina!A llstion of *aid impravet,eut. V1. Ti+i9 covenant And aerentnent tiholl be binding upon the p rtica hereto, their heirs, successors and assigns. VII This Agt'esmInt is hntered into in accordance with the proviciona of Ordinanme 14o. N.S. 239 of the City of Hormone. Beach. IN WITNESS 1;titEPEOi±, the Owner(M) has (have) affixed (his) (her) (their) sif;naturu(s) on tho d,sy and year first above written. • - 7 - 86'4425 8 P • 4 ATTEST: .fa. .� ,.,:. lctt,ll'.f:t3N Mi :,TO • RU `PP}OdE AS TO,11 _„ •► r r P E;, !diet Any and nil ram port. STAT; OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES bafol:e me, the undaraiRned a No- tery ,lu ono rot tarn -County and State, pereonelly eppeursd s ! nr--u `1SL130zz5..1 7rown Co -be Che perRon s w ora nomr N ati�ncr f o' t:� l,e w" i thin instrument and acknowledged Oa executed Cha Arima. fi HANRI LL voc.v.R 11. 1111tH ELL T11F. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH n Munici 1C,o •oration 1'yFfn ybr , , y4ty Clerk , City A' t rn►.ey brcincou, or attrc.h currant Tit:ia TOR qac 'ruNY 1)E iu:t l.t8 ) SS. ) ` .. .1; , V %: • ll;, nn..!. , '1,1 MY Cumm��'on Ver, In+ hrpt. 1(, 1'+'t,l w4••••w1.•.... . • ♦ .........4.•-••................ .H- t.ha County of. Las Angaleti, StoLe of California 86-142525'8 n7 1.IHf January 21, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 28, 1992 RELEASE OF CITY LIEN ON PROPERTY AT 636 - 24TH PLACE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Accept the cash deposit provided to the City in lieu of the existing lien on the property at 636 - 24th Place. 2. Approve the Release of Lien Agreement for the subject property. 3. Authorize the Mayor to sign the Release of Lien Agreement. 4. Authorize the Release of Lien Agreement to be recorded with the County Recorder. Background: In consideration of the deferment of street improvements as required by Ordinance No. N.S. 235 of the City, the property owner at 636 - 24th Place signed a Lien Agreement with the City of Hermosa Beach. That agreement was recorded on September 5, 1989, as Instrument No. 86-1424761 for the purpose of providing security relating to the installation of the required improvements. (A copy of the recorded Lien Agreement is attached for reference.) Analysis: The property owner wishes to refinance the loan on her property. However, the lender has required that the recorded Lien Agreement on the property be removed prior to any refinancing. Therefore, the property owner has provided a cash deposit to the City as a guarantee for the construction of the required street improvements. The City Engineer has executed a Cash Deposit Agreement for and on behalf of the City as authorized by Resolution No. N.S. 2470 of the City of Hermosa Beach. (A copy of the Cash Deposit Agreement is attached for reference.) To remove the Lien on the subject property, the City Council must either require the construction of the public street improvements or accept the cash deposit in lieu of the required public street improvements and approve the release of the Lien. The Lien Release must be signed by the Mayor and be recorded at the County Recorder's office. (A copy of the Release of Lien Agreement is attached for reference.) - 1 - lh The property owner needs to complete the refinancing of her new loan by the end of the month. Due to the time limits of the loan, the staff recommends that this request be approved. However, the staff recommends that in the future no further lien agreements be approved in lieu of constructing the public streetimprovements for this property. The file on this property includes the following: 11-15-84 4-20-89 4-20-89 5-2-89 LIEN AGREEMENT for the deferment of public street improvements. (recorded February 4, 1985, as instrument #85-133704) Cash Deposit Agreement for the guarantee of public street improvements. City received Cash Deposit (Receipt # 74787) Release of Lien Agreement (Recorded May, 15, 1989, as instrument #89-782658) 8-10-89 LIEN AGREEMENT for the deferment of public street improvements. (Recorded Sept. 5, 1989, as instrument #89-1424761) 10-13-89 Refund of Cash Deposit to City (P.O.#9320, Warrant #31489) 6-20-90 Cash Deposit agreement for the street improvements. 6-20-90 City received Cash Deposit (Receipt #95572) 1-28-92 Release of Lien Agreement received 4-20-89. guarantee of public Alternatives: 1. Accept the cash deposit in lieu of the required public street improvements and approve the release of the Lien. 2. Do not accept the cash deposit and require the public street improvements to be constructed at this time. 3. Do not accept the cash deposit and require the Lien to continue on the property. Respectfully submitted, Lynn Terry Deputy City Engineer pworks/ccsrlien Concur: lliam Glikman, Int▪ e▪ rim Director of Public Works Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager (FREE M CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH When Recorded Please Mail to: Kathleen Midstokke, City Clerk City Hall - Civic Center Hermosa Beach, California 90254 LIEN AGREEMENT 89--1424761 1 RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS RECORDER'S OFFICE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA 1 PAIS 9 AASEP 5 1989 4 THIS LIEN AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 10th day of August 89 , by and between: Dorothy Jeanne Berndt, sole owner hereinafter referred to as "Owner(s)", and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation, County of Los Angeles, State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City". _ W ITNESSET H: That in consideration of the waiver and deferment of the require- ment of installing or causing to be installed certain improve- ments in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. N.S. 235 -_of said City, the Owner does hereby expressly grant unto the City a lien upon that real property situated -in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, described as follows, to -wit: (Legal description and street address of prop- erty subject to lien) Lot 35, Block 2, Hermosa View Tract, County of Los Angeles, State of California, commonly known as 636 - 24th Place, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 including all buildings and improvements thereon, or that may be erected on said premises; together with all hereditaments and (FREE RECORDING IS REQUESTED PURSUANT TO GOVT. CODE § 6103 - BENEFITS CITY AND IS OFFICIAL BUSINESS OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALFIRONAA) - 1 - appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, and the reservations, remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof. As security for the faithful performance of all terms, conditions and covenants of that certain improvement agreement hereinafter set forth, said improvement agreement providing for the installa- tion of certain improvements in connection with the above described real property; said lien hereby granted further secur- ing any and all advances or expenditures required by the City to be made in causing the installation of said improvements in the event the same shall not be installed by the Owner is hereinafter provided in said improvement agreement, together with all advan- ces required to be made by the City in paying liens prior to this agreement, taxes and assessments, if any, services performed in the care of said premises, premium for fire insurance on build- ings, and in case of default and foreclosure searching of the title therefor, fees for legal services, assessments and costs of suit, and all liabilities incurred for the protection of the in- debtedness secured until the same is fully paid, the said agree- ment relating to the installation of said improvements hereby being in words and figures as follows, to -wit: 1007 of the total estimated cost of the improvement in THE SUM OF: SIX HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE $ 625.00 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Section 4 of Ordinance No. N.S. 235 of.the City of Her- mosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, provides 2 SO 1424761 that any person required to install or cause to be installed curb and gutter and/or sidewalk improvements under the provisions of Section 1 of said ordinance may delay said installation if there is less than 35% of curb and/or sidewalk installed on the same side of the street in the block of which the property is part, or if the City engineer determines that the street grade cannot readily be established or that the street for practical reasons has not been graded to an established grade which would enable proper location of curbs, gutters and/or sidewalks, provided the property owner signs an agreement with said City that said owner will construct curb and gutter and or sidewalks when 35% of the footage on the same side of the street within his block shall have curb and gutter, and/or sidewalks installed or agreed to be installed, or when the City Engineer determines that the street grade has been sufficiently established or that the street has been sufficiently graded to an established grade which would per- mit the proper location of curbs,'.gutters and/or sidewalks, and said Owner shall cause to be recorded a real property lien against the property to secure the performance of the agreement, and, WHEREAS, the undersigned falls within the provisions of said Sec- tion 1 of Ordinance No. N.S. 235 of the City of Hermosa Beach and desires to take advantage of said deferment or delay provisions of Section 4 of said ordinance in connection• with the installa- tion of said improvements: NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, in consideration of the defer- ment and delay hereby granted by the City of Hermosa Beach in ®9 1424761 3 connection with the installation of curb and gutter and/or side- walk along the street abutting that property described in the within lien agreement do hereby agree, promise and covenant with the City of Hermosa Beach as follows, to -wit: I That at such time as there shall have been constructed and in- stalled or agreed to be constructed and installed, curbs and gut- ters and/or sidewalks covering 357o of the footage within the block and on the same side of the street as said real property herein described is situated, or at such time that the City En- gineer determines that the street grade has been sufficiently established or that the street has been sufficiently graded to an established grade which would permit the proper location of curbs, gutters and/or sidewalks, the undersigned do hereby agree to construct and install curb and gutter and/or sidewalks, along the street abutting that real property hereinabove described in said lien agreement. II That said curb and gutter and/or sidewalks shall be constructed and installed in accordance with the grade established by the office of the City Engineer of the City of Hermosa Beach, and shall be in accordance with plans and specifications on file in said office, and shall be constructed and installed under the supervision of the City Engineer of said City. III 89 1424761 4 That in the event the undersigned shall fail, refuse, or neglect to comply with any term, covenant or provision herein contained, the City of Hermosa Beach may, at its election, construct and install said curb and gutter and/or sidewalks at its own cost and expense, following ten days written notice to said undersigned. That in the event the undersigned shall have failed, refused or neglected to reimburse the City of Hermosa Beach for all costs incurred by said City in the construction and installation of said curb and gutter and/or sidewalk improvements as herein pro- vided, or to have made arrangements satisfactory to the City En- gineer of said City in connection with said reimbursement, the holder of said improvement agreement secured hereby, is au- thorized and may elect, SUBJECT ONLY to the provisions of law in connection therewith, to do the following act or acts, and is by the execution hereof empowered to do said following act or acts: (a) That upon default by the Owner, the holder of this agreement is hereby authorized and empowered to serve written notice on said Owner of said default, together with the declaration and demand that said property be sold and of election to cause to be sold said property. After the lapse of such time as may be required by fol- lowing the law applicable to the sale of real property after the default on the Trust Deed and after notice of said sale has been given in the manner required by the law of Trust Deeds. The holder of this agreement is then empowered to sell said property at the time and place fixed in said notice of sale, at public auction to the highest bidder. Any person including the Owner, and S9 1424761 5 undersigned, may purchase at said sale; (b) To procure insurance on the buildings for the benefit of said City; (c) To enter upon the premises, if neglected or abandoned, to care for and cultivate the same; (d) To pay all liens or encumbrances that are prior to this agreement, including all taxes and assessments upon said premises; (e) To advance money for any purpose necessary to protect said premises; (f) To commence an action to foreclose this agreement and lien when any obligation or money secured hereby is due, owing and payable under the terms hereof; (g) That as additional security, the Owner and undersigned hereby confers upon the holder of this agreement, during the continuation thereof, and in thereunder, the right to collect profits of said property, and to the event of default the rents, retain the extent required to satisfy said agreement. IV issues and same to the The said Owner and undersigned covenants and agrees that he has a fee title in and to said property free and clear of all en- cumbrances, except those stated in writing to the City; that said Owner will not permit the existence of any lien prior to this agreement unless herein expressly mentioned; that said Owner will pay all taxes and assessments levied upon the premises described herein; and that said Owner will keep all buildings insured for - 6 89 1424761 the benefit of the City in a sum not less than the reasonable value thereof plus 100% of the total estimated cost of the im- provement in the sum of SIX HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE AND NO/100 DOLLARS $625.00 , required to be made in accordance with the provisions thereof. (Twenty-five (25) lineal feet of cement @ $25/ft) V That this agreement and lien is executed for the purpose of securing and guaranteeing the construction and installation of an improvement, to -wit: Curb and gutter and/or sidewalk, which has an estimated cost of SIX HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE $ 625.00 that the Owner shall be released from the provisions hereof and a satisfaction of lien caused to be filed upon deposition 100%_of the total estimated cost of the improvement with the City the sum of SIX HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE $ 625.00 , said sum being deposited for purposes of covering the costs of the construction and installation of said improvement. VI This covenant and agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, successors and assigns. VII This agreement is entered into in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. N.S. 235 of the City of Hermosa Beach. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owner(s) has (have) affixed (his) (her) (their) signature(s) on the day and year first above.written. 7 89 1424761 ATTEST: NOTE: List any and all Report. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 105 ) &T On tary Pub appeared: By: THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH a Municipal Corporation • r, Cityof Hermosa Beach C 3une u)iLU Ms) , City Clerk 99 1424761 , City Attorney emcumbrances, or attach current Title SS. , before me, the undersigned, a No- ic in and for said Count and State, personally eDO 1 s Jn known to be the person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged ter executed the same. OFFICIAL SEAL LINDA RIDDLE NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN LEIS ANGELES COUNTY My Comm. Eye, AAlll 4, 1493 -- wrw+rewr.111n.- CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT 4al"E Sk'1Q, 4 ) NST'RY PUBLIC in and or the County of Los Angeles, State of California NO. 202 ' ! l! _-�l!ll./l!!-/1J./I./�Il1lYJl./!l�./!J.�1JY-/!./lll�.rt./.r./-/-/-l!!1llrll./111!✓I.lJY!-/!llllJl1JJlJ.Y' .�.� State of County of deA SS. 89 1424761 OFFICIAL SEAL LINDA RIDDLE NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Comm. Exp. AprIl 9, 1993 On this the day of ettoLE 19.85, before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared JUne. 1ALL hAS, MALIQR od-leencv $. personally known to me D proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who executed the within instrument as (4Q� _f&ir on behalf of the corporation.therein named, and acknowledged to me that the corporation executed it. WITNESS my hind and official seal. Nota ature • CASH DEPOSIT AGREEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the following Agreement is made and entered into this 20th day of June , 19 g0 , by and between Dorothy Jeanne Berndt, sole owner Now residing at: hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH a :municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", said Owner being the owner of real property situated in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, des- cribed as follows: to wit: Lot 35, Block 2, Hermosa View Tract County of Los Angeles, State of California Commonly known as 636 - 24th Place, Hermosa Beach CA 90254 WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. N.S. 235 of the City of Hermosa Beach, the Owner, by reason of causing the construction of a building or dwelling upon his property, is re- quired to install or cause the installation of 25 lineal feet of portland cement (this is to release lien dated August 10, 1989 stating $25/ft equals $625) WHEREAS, Section 5 of said Ordinance provides that any person required to make certain improvements may make a cash deposit with the City to guarantee construction of said improvements, said deposit being determined by the City Engineer as that sum necessary to cover the cost of construction and installation of• said improvements, and WHEREAS, the owner desires not to make the required improvements but to make a cash deposit with the City to guarantee the con- struction of said improvements, and WHEREAS, the City is willing to accept the cash deposit in lieu of the actual construction as required by the provisions of said Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE BE IT AGREED 1. That the owner, by depositing the sum of $625.00 with the City of Hermosa Beach, is relieved of the requirements for immediate installation of certain improvements, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. N.S. 235 of said City, as a 1 condition for final approval of buildings or dwellings by the Building Inspector. 2. That the City may at its option, construct and install the required improvements or delay said construction until such time as it may deem best in the interests of the City. 3. That if the owner, desires to construct and install the required improvements at any time prior to any construction of said improvements by the City, the sum of SIX HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS shall be returned to said owner upon satisfactory completion of the improvements, or shall be credited to him in the event of a neighborhood voluntary cash contribution improvement program. 4. That in the event of the formation of a special assess- ment district for the purpose of constructing street and sidewalk improvements, said district including the property hereinbefore described, the property owner of record at such time will be credited with the sum of $ 625.00 toward the assessment charges levied against said property. 5. That the provisions of this agreement shall inure to the parties hereto, their heirs, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has by Resolution No. N.S. 2470 of its City Council, adopted at its meeting on February 19, 1963, authorized this Agreement to be executed for and on behalf of the City by the City Engineer and attested by its City Clerk. ATTEST: /Q04-4/-4-4-4-1 City Clerk APPROV_, AS TO FORM City Attorney CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Reviewed BY r l/'J ► V Dir=e•' or of Publ OWN s ) WHEN RECORDED, PLEASE RETURN TO: Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RELEASE OF LIEN AGREEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the Lien entered into by Dorothy Jeanne Berndt claimed by the City of Hermosa Beach upon the following described property, to wit: Lot 35, Block 2, Hermosa View Tract No. 2, as recorded in Book 10, Page 40 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder, County of Los Angeles, State of California. (AKA 636 - 24th Place) as authorized by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, is hereby released. That certain lien recorded as Document No. 89-1424761 on September 5, 1989, of Official Records, as recorded in the Recorder's Office of Los Angeles County, State of California, is hereby satisfied and discharged. Dated: January 28, 1992 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA By Kathleen Midstokke, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 0-(Aiebtig.- ' City Clerk City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) On January 28, 1992, before me, Elaine Doerfling, the undersigned, Notary Public of said County and State, personally appeared Kathleen Midstokke, known to me to be the Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, and known to me to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of said public corporation herein named, and acknowledged to me that such public corporation executed the same. pworks/relien Notary Public in and for the County of Los Angeles January 22, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 28, 1992 CREATION OF RESERVE ACCOUNT FOR POTENTIAL RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS AND APPLICATION FOR REFUND RELATING TO AB 702 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council direct staff to: 1. Create a reserve account for funds potentially owed to the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) for the employer portion of retirement costs, pending resolution of the lawsuit over AB 702. 2. Apply for a refund of amounts paid to PERS this fiscal year for the employers portion of PERS, with the refund received to be deposited to the reserve account. Background: AB702 was passed as part of the 91-92 State budget process to help the State balance the budget. The bill eliminated two special accounts which provided cost of living adjustments (COLAs) for PERS retirees. The accounts were funded from a specified portion of earnings on active PERS member contributions. The COLAs will now be funded through a different calculation of members interest. The League notified cities of the bill's passage in July, however, the amount available for cities and guidelines from PERS were not distributed until December. The result of the bill is that PERS employers, including the State and most cities have funds available to offset employer contributions for retirement costs. Analysis: The City pays both the employer and employee contributions for retirement. Hermosa Beach's allocation of $823,549 can be used to offset the employer portion and equals approximately 13 months of payments. PERS will begin using these funds to pay our employer contribution starting with the December PERS report which will be filed before the end of January. Use of the credit is mandatory until all funds are exhausted. A lawsuit has been filed by a coalition of 20 individuals and employee organizations challenging AB 702; a decision is not expected until Spring of 1992. If the lawsuit is successful, the credits used to offset employer contributions may have to be repaid in some manner. Because of this pending legal action, staff recommends a conservative approach of setting aside monies owed for employer contributions as they are calculated each month - 1 - ti until a decision is reached. The City Attorney concurs with this approach. In the event the bill is upheld, funds will be available for expenditure at that time. Since the funds from AB 702 are non-recurring and available only this one time, staff believes the funds should not be used for ongoing operations or to "balance the budget" unless we believe the economy will absolutely recoverby midyear 1992-93 when our credit runs out. Staff also recommends that the City apply for a refund of employer contributions paid this fiscal year in the amount of $329,369.15. Monies refunded would be deposited to our reserve account here in Hermosa Beach. Contributions made to PERS so far have been deposited to the PERS Employer Reserve Account and earn interest for 1991-92 of 6.87%. Balances in the AB702 account do not earn interest. If we receive a refund we can earn interest on the refund in our possession and interest on the AB 702 funds used to pay our contributions because the funds are then transferred to our PERS Employer Reserve Account where interest is earned. If we do not apply for a refund, we earn interest only on funds paid to PERS so far. The City Treasurer concurs that more interest can be earned if we apply for the refund. Attached is a notice from the League regarding AB 702. Concur: �( (1-i2t„A4L Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Viki Copeland Finance Director I1' ZEMN MIME MIMS CM NIL f• -L League of Califomia Cities 1400 K STREET • SACRAMENTO. CA 95814 • i9151144-5790 RECEIVED Cdr,rprn,a C;hes Werk '(,'ether DEC 1 6 1991 Happy Holiday CITY MGR. OFFICE News From The League December 11, 1991 TO: Mayors, City Managers, City Attorneys and Finance Directors FROM: League Staff RE: Good News Re: SB 2557 & PERS Contributitions We're happy to provide some good news for cities as we end 1991; one relates to the litigation over SB 2557 and the other relates to city PERS payments. Booking Fees Can't Be Withheld - Court Supports Cities A court ruled last week that counties may not withhold the amount due to them from cities for booking fees from the city's property tax allocations. A number of counties had withheld these funds from the cities' share of property tax receipts (which are collected by the county and distributed to cities), even though cities properly objected to the withholding under Government Code Section 907. The ruling also applies to withholding property tax administration fees from redevelopment - agencies' and special districts' property tax allocations. Unfortunately, the ruling does not apply to the property tax administration fees levied against cities (see Legislative Bulletin for further details). The court set Feb. 7 as the date that it will hear oral arguments on cities' various legal objections to SB 2557. On another legal front, the California Supreme Court has agreed to hear the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency v. Ikemoto case, regarding whether SB 2557 applies to redevelopment agencies and the significance, if any, to the so-called "Maddy letter." PERS Cities To Receive Credits Beginning with the December, 1991 payroll service period, PERS will automatically use excess accumulated earnings to pay for cities' PERS contributions. Cities will be informed of the actual dollar amount by PERS this month. It is expected to reach about 13 months of payments for the typical member city. These credits are a result of a compromise between the Governor and Legislature to balance the State's budget for this year and involved the use of accumulated funds from PERS. The result, AB 702, granted employers nearly $2 billion in retirement contribution credits to member agencies through the elimination of the individual dividend disbursement account (IDDA) and the extraordinary performance dividend account (EPDA) retiree purchasing power accounts. PERS has developed certain guidelines about how the credits may be used: • Credits may only be used to offset the employer's share of retirement contributions. • Credits must be used before surplus assets or cash payments... • The use of these credits will commence with the December 1991 payroll service periods and continue to be used until exhausted. • Any 1991/92 employer contributions already paid in cash will be refunded only upon written request and a like amount will be transferred from the AB 702 funds. Use of surplus assets in 1991/92 will not be reversed. • Interest will be credited to the employer's account rather than to AB 702 balances. NOTE: Although PERS will begin applying AB 702 credits this month, the state is currently being sued over the legality of applying IDDA/EPDA funds to offset employer contributions. An adverse ruling may mean member agencies will be required to make up payments. Cities may want to discuss both the 2557 ruling and the PERS credits with their finance directors and city attorneys. Happy Holidays from the entire League staff and we hope this little bit of good news will carry you through the holidays. 2 /a2/9' January 13, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 28, 1992 TRAFFIC CONTROL PRE-EMPTION ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY CIP 86-176 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve additional funding for Traffic Control Pre-emption on Pacific Coast Highway from the State Gas Tax Fund in the amount of $35,468. 2. Approve funding for the project from the Grant Fund in the amount of $35,000. 3. Approve plans and specifications for CIP 86-176, Traffic Control Pre-emption, and authorize staff to call for bids on this project. 4. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary. Background: This City project proposes to install traffic control pre-emption devices at all signalized intersections on Pacific Coast Highway. These six locations are as follows: Pacific Pacific Pacific Pacific Pacific Pacific Coast Coast Coast Coast Coast Coast Highway Highway Highway Highway Highway Highway and 2nd Street and 5th Street and 8th Street and Aviation Boulevard and Pier Avenue and 21st Street The City's Traffic Control Pre-emption Project CIP 86-176, was included in the FY 89-90 Budget. In a staff memorandum to the City Council on June 27, 1989, the Director of Public Works recommended that this project be delayed until after Caltrans completed their Pacific Coast Highway traffic signal interconnection project which was under construction at that time. On June 12, 1990, City Council authorized the Mayor to sign a letter requesting funding from the South Bay Hospital District for the traffic control pre-emption on Pacific Coast Highway. On December 13, 1990; the South Bay Hospital, Grants and Projects Committee approved a matching fifty percent grant to the City (with a $35,000 maximum) for their participation in the total project cost. A copy of the letter notifying the City of the approved grant is attached for information. Analysis: - 1 - lj Traffic signal pre-emption devices allow emergency vehicles to "pre-empt" traffic signals giving them the "Green Light" as they approach the intersection. This allows the emergency vehicle to control the traffic at the intersection and provides a safe passage for the emergency vehicle. Similar devices have already been installed within the neighboring cities of Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach. The proposed pre-emption devices are to be compatible for use in all three cities. See the attached newspaper article from the Beach Reporter, dated November 7, 1991, about recent action in the City of Manhattan Beach with their opticom traffic control system. Fiscal Impact: Proposed Funding Source: State Gas Tax/Hospital Grant FY 1991-92 The estimated construction and equipment cost is: $ 63,813 The estimated contingency cost is: $ 6,655 Total Estimated Completion Cost of the Project: $ 70,468 Because of the general state of the economy, the staff recommends that funds originally proposed to come from the City's general fund not be_ used and that State Gas Tax Funds and the Hospital Grant Funds be used instead. The reimbursement funding to be,received from the South Bay Hospital District would assist the City and reduce the amount of City State Gas Tax Funds required for this project. A copy of the CIP Budget sheet for this project is attached. Alternatives: Alternatives considered by staff and available to the City Council are: 1. Provide no funding for the project in FY 1991-92 2. Wait and fund in the FY 1992-93 Budget. Respectfully submitted, N�>yf2C Ochi Homa j'oun Behboodi Assistant Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director pworks/ccip176 Concur: ynn A. Terry Deputy City Engineer liam Glican, Interim blic Works Director Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager SBHD 4 fr A PUBLIC ENTITY -50.2,crfdL Hospital District December 14, 1990 Kevin Northcraft City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 Dear Kevin: I am pleased to inform you that the South Bay Hospital District Board, at its December 13, 1990 meeting, approved a Challenge Grant in the amount of $35,000 for the Traffic Control Pre- emption system. This grant was made subject to the condition that the City of Hermosa Beach obtain an additional $35,000 from other sources to meet the full cost of the system. Congratulations on your success in obtaining District support .for your project. Please keep us informed of your progress in ob- taining matching funds. Happy holiday. Sincerely, SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL DISTRICT P V,JL Philip Valera Executive Director .700 North Pacific Coast Highway ' Suite 206 .. • Redondo Beach, California 90277 (213) 374-3426 FAX (213) 376-4738 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Virginia 0. Fischer Ken Johnson Jean G. McMillan James M. Riewer Eva T. Snow DIRECTOR EMERITUS Gerald R. Witt EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Philip Valera The Beach Reporter • November 7, 1991 Manhattan expands traffic light system for emergency vehicles by Cara Murphy The Manhattan Beach City Council has approved a contrac- tor and equipment purchases for a system that will change traffic lights to green to help emergency vehicles get to their destination quicker. The traffic control system, by Opticom, will be installed at 15 intersections along Manhattan Beach Boulevard and Highland Avenue. Two years ago, the Manhat- tan Beach Fire Department had received some complaints from residents about the slow re- sponse time of emergency ve- hicles, according to Ish Med- rano, engineering technician for Manhattan Beach. Delays occur from traffic congestions in and around major intersections as fire trucks, police cars or ambu- lances try to speed through. The Opticom System expe- dites and reduces the response time of emergency vehicles by moving traffic, left turns in- cluded, proceeding in the emer- gency vehicle's direction through the intersection, Medrano said. This prevents any delays caused by stopped vehicles blocking the intersection. The system, which can be installed anywhere on the traffic light assembly, detects a strobe light emitter located on top of the emergency vehicle and pre- empts normal traffic signal operation to give preference to the direction of the emergency vehicle. Medrano said the strobe has a 500 -foot range. Installation will be completed in less than a month once the equipment arrives, Medrano said, which can take anywhere from 8 to 12 weeks. This project was approved in the 1989-90 budget as the second phase for the installation of Opticom throughout the city. The first phase provided for the installa- tion at 10 intersections along Sepulveda Boulevard, which Medrano said is working well and has resulted in fewer re- sponse time complaints. Medrano explained that in order to avoid the contractor's mark-up on the equipment and to give the city greater quality control, the city is purchasing the Opticom system equipment directly from manufacturers and is having a separate contractor install it. The contractor will receive about $36,000 and equipment costs will be about $95,000. The total cost for the outlay came in well under the $188,000 budget limit for the project. Two additional .intersections will be added as alternatives: Aviation Boulevard at Marine Avenue and Rosecrans Avenue. Since the overall project cost was about $50,000 less than was budgeted, the $5,000 for the additional intersections re- quested by the fire department will fit easily into the budget, Medrano said. EXPENDITURES PROJECT ELEMENTS CIP 86-176 TRAFFIC CONTROL PRE-EMPTION EXPENDED EXPENDED FINAL FINAL PRIOR TO BUDGET THRU EXPENDED BALANCE FY90-91 FY90-91 4/30/91 6/30/91 6/30/91 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS, SPECS & ESTIMATES 8,264 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS SUBTOTAL 8,264 CONTINGENCY TOTAL EXPENDITURE $8,264 FUNDING SOURCES + + 001 GENERAL FUND 2,732 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND (a) 5,532 150 GRANT FUND (b) 0 Hospital District TOTAL FUNDING (c) TOTAL UNFUNDED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BUDGET BUDGET FY91-92 FY92-93 + 63,813 ESTIMATED FUTURE NEEDS ESTIMATED PROJECT I FY93-94 FY94-95 FY95-96 TOTAL 0 8,264 63,813 0 0 0 0 0 63,813 0 0 0 0 72,077 0 6,655 6,655 SO SO SO SO $70,468 0 0 0 0 35,468 35,000 SO SO SO SO $78,732 2,732 41,000 35,000 $8,264 SO SO SO SO $70,468 SO SO SO $78,732 SO SO $0 SO RECOMMENDED REVISION (1/28/92) AS FOLLOWS: TO APPROVE: (a) STATE GAS TAX FUNDING in FY 1991-92: $35,468 (b) GRANT FUNDING from Hospital in FY 1991-92: $35,000 (c) CITY COUNCIL ACTION JANUARY 28, 1992 "VoL4' o -W\ ; January 21, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council January 26, 1992 UPGRADE OF CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS VIDEO SYSTEM Recommendation: It is recommended by staff that Council receive and file the staff report on the upgrade of the City Council Chambers video system. Background: In September, 1991 the City Council directed staff to prepare a report which specified how the present video system, which is used to cablecast the City Council and Planning Commission meetings, could be upgraded from the present single camera to a multi camera system. The city is presently providing live and taped replays of the City Council and Planning Commission meetings in addition to special workshops and meetings which are held in the City Council Chambers. The City is using a single camera and two VHS recorders to record and playback the messages. The City also plays text messages of upcoming City and Community events during the recesses of the .meetings. The present equipment was purchased in 1986. The equipment has performed as expected and the City has not experienced any types of malfunctions with the equipment. The text messages which are played during the meeting recesses arc prepared with equipment which is "loaned" to the City. Staff expects that the tube in the JVC camera will need to be replaced during the year. The cost of the retubing is estimated to cost between $2000.00 and $2,500.00. The cost of the refurbishment will exceed the price of a similar type of camera. The video tape recorder will also need to be overhauled during the year. It is estimated that the overhaul will cost approximately four hundred dollars per machine, which is more than the cost to replace each of the video tape recorders. Analysis In light of the projected mid year budget shortfall, staff cannot at this time, recommend the complete upgrade of the present single camera system to a multicamera, remotely controlled video system. It is estimated that such a system would cost ($26,000) twenty six thousand dollars. ik -2 - During the next fiscal year, staff will include $26,000.00 for equipment replacement in its budget request. This replacement equipment would consist of three (3) single chip cameras which would be remotely operated. This configuration would enable the city to cablecast the meetings with reduced distraction from the constant movement of the single camera, and to show the individuals who are speaking (as they are speaking). The cameras would continue to only show the council member or city staff member who is speaking, the individual who has been recognized by the Mayor to speak at the podium, the vote tabulations and a wide shot of the council dias. The system would be operated from the rear of the Council Chambers by a single operator. The upgraded system would require less direct light as is now used by the two 750 watt floodlights. The lights would be replaced by two, five hundred watt lights which would be diffused and the light bounced off of the ceiling. This would provide less harsh lighting and a more natural and comfortable setting. The system would also include a character generator which would provide identification of the council member who is speaking and it would also provide a "crawl message" which would inform the viewers at home on the item which the City Council is considering. During recesses and breaks in the live cablecast of the meeting, city and community announcements would appear on the screen. The character generator is equipped with a disk drive which would enable staff to prepare and store messages in advance. The information would be called up as needed. .In the past six years video technology has changed dramatically. Tubes in cameras have been replaced by micro chips. This has resulted in clearer pictures, less light needed to make a brighter picture, smaller and lighter weight cameras and at a significantly reduced cost. The newer equipment requires less maintenance, is easier to operate and has a six to ten year life expectancy. The system would be operated by a single individual. No new staging is proposed for the operation of the upgraded system. The present part time Cable Television Production Assistant, the Public Information & Cable Coordinator and Community Resources Recreation Staff will be trained in the operation of the system. Other Options Available to the City Council: o Require that the Cable Operator provide the funds for the equipment as part of the renewal of the Cable Television franchise. 3 o Appropriate twenty-six thousand dollars for the purchase of a three camera remotely operated video system. Respectfully Submitted; /1n.. Warren S. Carter, Coordinator Public Information & Cable TV concu Steve Wisniewski City Manager Noted for fiscal impact: attachments: Proposed equipment list Immo Concur. OicCiitak4,v Viki Copeland Finance Director erector nity Resources Proposed Video Equipment Item # Quanity Item 1. 3 Panasonic WV -05100 CCD Cameras 2. 3 WV -S061 Panasonic System Kit 3. 3 WV-LZ15/12 Auto Iris Lens 4. 3 WV-CR12 Remose Camera Controllers 5. 3 WV-PH10 Pan/Tilt Heads 6. 3 WV-CC29A Carrying Case 7. 3 WV VF65B B/W Electronic Viewfinders 8. 3 WV-Q39A Viewfinder bracket 9. 3 WV -LK -11 Lens Control Kit 10. 1 JVC KM-D600U SEG 11. 2 CT 1030M 10" Color Monitors 12. 1 Quanta QCG 34 Character Generator 13. 1 Clear Com -Com SM - PAC1 14. 3 SM -1 Clcarcom Stations 15. 3 Bogen 3065 Tripods with fluid head 16. 2 JVC BR 7700U VHS Recorders 17. 3 Elcctrovoice 635A Microphones 18. 3 Pan WV -5200B BW Monitors 19. Assorted connectors 20. 1 rack for equipment 21. 1 Double muff headphones 22. 500' audio video cable January 22, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of January 28, 1992 AMENDMENT TO SCHOOL FIELDS USAGE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Recommendation Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor to sign an amended agreement with the School District for the allocation of $11,500 from the City to the District for landscape maintenance services that would remove the requirement that the contractor be "state certified." Please note: Recommendation from the City Treasurer listed at the end of this item. Background At the November 26, 1991 City Council Meeting, Council approved the agreement with the School District that would provide $11,500 to the District to assist 'them in meeting the costs for landscape maintenance services at the Valley School site. This agreement was approved by the School Board at their November 13, 1991 meeting and was signed by the School District's Superintendent, Dr. Elaine Gourley. One of the requirements listed in this contract (see line three, page four) was that the District would utilize a "mutually agreed upon state certified contractor." After the agreement was signed, the District indicated that they had discovered their contractor was not certified and requested that the agreement be amended to eliminate that requirement. As staff is responsible to administer the terms of the contract, no funds have been released to the District to date pending Council's approval of the requested amendment. Analysis At the advice of the City Attorney, staff obtained a letter from the District's Attorney stating that they (the District) are not required to hire licensed or certified contractors for landscape services. The City received this letter on January 16. As the City is allocating funds to the District and is not responsible for hiring the contractor, it would not be necessary from a legal standpoint, to impose the City's standards on them. With Council's approval, staff will proceed with the administration of the other terms of the contract and will release the funds to the District per the agreement. The spirit of this cooperative effort between the City and the District - 1 - 11 remains unchanged. These funds will help to insure that the Valley School site continues to be a well-maintained playground for the school children, recreation participants and the general public. Other alternatives available to Council include: . Do not amend the agreement. . Request mcre information. ATTACHMENTS: 1. November 26, 1991 Council Agenda Item "Formal Agreement Between the City and School District To Provide City funds for the Purpose of Maintaining Landscaped Areas at Hermosa Valley School." 2. Council Minutes from November 26, 1991 meeting. 3. Letter from School District's Attorney (Jan. 114, 1992). 4. New Maintenance Agreement Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Ve4re City Attorney Respectfully submitted, Mary P. :-oney; Director Dept of Community Resources City Treasurer's recommendation: Because the fact specifications have changed since this matter was first approved by City Council; it would be prudent to review thi:•uatter in i� its entirety before awarding this contract. Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director 2 1 November 19, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of November 26, 1991 FORMAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT TO PROVIDE CITY FUNDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAINTAINING LANDSCAPED AREAS AT HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by staff that Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached agreement between the City and the School District which would allocate $11,500 of City funds to the District for the purpose of maintaining landscaped areas of Hermosa Valley School in exchange for its use as a recreation area during non -school hours. BACKGROUND At the September 10, 1991 meeting, Council approved in concept an allocation of $11,500 from the Public Works budget to the School District to assist them with costs associated with maintaining the landscaped areas of Hermosa Valley School. At that time, staff was directed to work with the District to draft a formal agreement that would insure that the property will be available for City sanctioned recreation activities, youth sports and general public use during hours that the property is not scheduled with school activities. This agreement, which was reviewed and approved by the School Board at their November 13, 1991 meeting, is attached for Council review and approval. ANALYSIS City staff and the City Attorney worked with School District staff on this agreement which is evaluated to address all of the essential City issues with regards to the use of this property. As stated in the agreement, the playing surfaces and landscaped areas at Hermosa Valley School will be available to the City on a priority basis during hours that the school is not using them. The School District will be fully responsible to administer the landscape maintenance contract per the conditions listed in the agreement and in a manner suitable for recreational use. If approved, the term of the agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year beginning on December 1, 1991. Per City. Attorney recommendation, payments to the District from the City shall be made on a monthly basis as a means of insuring that the terms are adhered to. •1 • I if 0.1\'1 It should be noted that School District staff did not want to include a provision in the agreement to authorize the City to post signs �n the school property indicating the days and hours it would be available to the general public (as was suggested City staff at the September 10th Council meeting). As the request was originally_intended to assist the District in establishing limitations on the hours the facility would be available to the public, it does not pose any significant problem where City interests are concerned. In recognizing that the School District property is one of the City's best outdoor facilities and that City and youth sports programs continue to grow, this agreement for shared facility use introduces a cost effective solution for meeting the City's growing recreational needs. It is hoped that it also represents a positive step towards a future trend of cooperative efforts between the two agencies where the end result will be of great benefit to the community. Other alternatives available to Council include: 1. Modify the attached agreement. 2. Reject the attached agreement. 3. Request additional information.. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Schools Fields Usage and Maintenance Agreement 2. Council Agenda Item: Sept. 10, 1991 3. Minutes from Sept. 10, 1991 Council meeting Respectfully submitted, Bil. Glickman In'erim Director Public Work D -pt. Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Mary oney, Director Comm pity Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Director Finance Department (a) (b) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on November 12, 1991. Action: To approve the minutes of the meeting of Novem- ber 12, 1991, as presented. - Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants No. 38883 and Nos. 39000 through 39146 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 39002, 39003, 39004, 39036, 39037, 39080, 39081, 39082, 39083, and 39105. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) (e) • Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. Recommendation to receive and file the October, 1991 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report. Action: To receive and file the October, 1991, finan- cial reports. Recommendation to receive and file 1st Quarter status report on Capital Improvement Program, FY 1991-1992. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated November 5, 1991. Action: To receive and file the 1st quarter status re- port on Capital Improvement Program for fiscal year 1991-1992, which shows the progress of 27 projects totaling $3,009,839. Recommendation to approve formal agreement between the City and the School District to provide City funds for the purpose of maintaining landscaped areas at Hermosa Valley School. Memorandum from Community Resources Di- rector Mary Rooney dated November 19, 1991. _ This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Pro ecfnctratql To table the item for six months to ee"Yf the School Board changes its priorities in regard to its expenditures. Motion Essertier, second Benz. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Edgerton, Wiemans, and Mayor Midstokke. City Council Minutes 11-26-91 Page 7636 •a -if o • f o approve the Staff recommendation to approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement between the City and the School District which would allocate $11,500 of City funds (payable on a monthly basis from the Public Works Department budget) to the District for the purpose of maintaining landscaped areas of Hermosa Valley School in exchange for its use as a recreation area during non -school hours. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Edgerton. So ordered, noting the objection of Essertier. Recommendation to accept construction as complete for sanitary sewer improvements, Target Area 4, CIP 88-406. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated November 18, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) accept construction as complete for the Sanitary Sewer Improvements, Target area 4, CIP 88-406, con- structed by Colich & Sons at a cost of $1,441,657.98 for the replacement of existing pipe with new clay pipe for 7,281 lineal feet and the sliplining of existing pipe with polyethelene pipe for 4,516 feet for a total rehabilitation of 11,797 lineal feet -at 18 separate locations; 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Comple- tion; and, 3) authorize staff to: a) release the retention payment of $144,165.80 to Colich & Sons 35 days after recordation of the Notice of Completion (provided no stop notices or mechanics liens are received within that time period; and, b) release Colich & Sons from the Faithful Perfor- mance Bond and the Labor and Materials Bond in the original amount of $1,587,648 for each bond after the Notice of Completion is recorded. Recommendation to approve in concept the relocation of the west end of Gould Terrace. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated: November 19, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve in concept the relocation of the west one hundred (100) feet of Gould Terrace; and, 2) vacate in concept the incorrect location of the west one hundred (100) feet of Gould Terrace as described in the easement, due to the fact that the street is not physically located within the record- ed street easement but rather is paved over private property. Recommendation to approve request for 30 day extension of temporary appointment for the Acting General Services City Council Minutes 11-26-91 Page 7637 KEITH V. BREON MARGARET E. O'DONNELL DAVID G. MILLER PRISCILLA BROWN GREGORY J. DANNIS EMI R. UYEHARA BRIDGET A. FLANAGAN NANCY BOURNE KATHRYN LUNE MARILYN J. CLEVELAND LAURIE S. JUENGERT JAMES M. SNORE JOAN BIRDT MARTHA BUELL SCOTT SPECIAL COUNSEL BREON, O'DONNELL, MILLER, BROWN .& DANNIS ATTORNEYS AT LAW January 14, 1992 Honorable Kathleen Midstokke Mayor, City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 RECEIVED JAN 1 5 1992 CITY MGR. OFFICE 22114 FLOOR. THE SNELL BUILDING 100 BUSH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104 FAX (413) 982-6470 (413) 788-4999 17860 MORO ROAD. SUITE H120 SALINAS, CALIFORNIA 93907 (4081 663-0470 2550 VIA TEJON, SUITE 3A PALOS VEROES, CALIFORNIA 90274 FAX (310) 373-6808 (310) 373-68137 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA (310) 642-1123 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA (714) 662-6977 SAN FRANCISCO REPLY TO' Re: Hermosa School District: Employment of Site Gardener; . Our file 3505.1000 Dear Mayor Midstokke: The Hermosa Beach School District has asked that I provide the City of Hermosa Beach with information regarding the District's employment of a gardener on the site known as Hermosa Valley School. Neither the Education Code nor the District's policies require that the individual hired be licensed or otherwise certified by the state. questions. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any Very truly yours, BREON, O'DONNELL, MILLER, BROWN & DANNIS (1)4kvaL- Priscilla Brown PB:mz _ SCHOOL FIELDS USAGE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS SCHOOL FIELDS USAGE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is entered into as of the 26th day of November, 1991 by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation (the "City"), and the HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, a regularly organized and existing school district under the laws of'the State of California (the "School District"). RECITALS A. The School District is the fee simple owner of the school site at 1645 Valley Drive located within the city of Hermosa Beach. B. The City and School District desire to make this open space (the "Open Space") available for the benefit of the community. . C. The City and the School District additionally desire that such open space be maintained in a suitable manner. D. The City and the School District desire that such open space be maintained as set forth below and recognize that a financial partnership for such maintenance is appropriate. E. California Education Code (Reorganized) (the "Ed. Code") Section 10900 et seq. and California Government Code Section 6500 et seq. authorize a school district and a city to cooperate in providing recreational facilities for the benefit of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals, which are incorporated herein by this reference and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the City and the School District further agree as follows: Section 1. Initial Agreements A. School District's Warranties: As an inducement to the City to enter into this Agreement, the School District represents, warrants and covenants as follows: (i) that it is a regularly organized and existing school district under the laws of the State of California, duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of California; (ii) that it has power and authority, to carry on its function as a school district, to enter into this Agreement, and to consummate the transaction herein contemplated; (iii) that all actions required to be taken by or on behalf of the School District to authorize it to out the terms of this Agreement have been prior to the execution of this Agreement; make, deliver and carry duly and properly taken and (iv) that this Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of the School except as the moratoria, or District, enforceable in accordance with its terms, same may be affected by bankruptcy, insolvency, similar laws, or by legal or equitable principles relating to or limiting the rights of contracting parties generally. 2 B. City's Warranties. As an inducement to the School District to enter into this Agreement, the City represents, warrants and covenants as follows: (i) that it is a municipal corporation, duly organized, validly existing. and in good standing under the laws of the State of California; (ii) that it has power and authority to carry on its function as a city, to enter into this Agreement, and to consummate the transaction herein contemplated; (iii) that all actions required to be taken by or on behalf of the City to authorize it to make, deliver and carry out the terms of this Agreement have been duly and properly taken prior to the execution of this Agreement; and (iv) that this Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of the City, enforceable in accordance with its terms except as the same may be affected by bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium or similar laws, or by legal or equitable principles relating to or limiting the rights of contracting parties generally. Section 2. The Open Space. The open space subject to the terms of this Agreement shall be: A. The playing surfaces and landscaped areas at Hermosa Valley School. Section 3. Covenant. The City covenants to deliver to the School District the total sum of eleven thousand five hundred ($11,500) dollars in monthly installments on the first day of each month in the amount of eleven hundred ($1100.00) dollars for ten months, and a payment of five hundred ($500) dollars the eleventh month of this agreement. Such payments shall be for the purpose of maintaining the Open Space in a manner suitable for recreational use. Such maintenIpce shall be performed by a mutually agreed upon 3t..t..- ..rt flea contractor. The school district shall have sole responsibility to pay for and administer the work of the contractor per the terms of this agreement. Section 4. Term. The term of this Agreement (the "Te ") 1,160. shall be one (1) year (the "Covenant") effective December 1, 1991 February 1, 1992, with renewal negotiable by both parties. Section 5. Scheduling. The School District shall be responsible for scheduling the use of the Open Space during the Usage Period and shall have priority in the use of the Open Space at any time. In order for the City to schedule a priority use of the field during the period of this agreement, the City shall schedule such uses with the School District by means of a Use of Facilities Permit, without payment of any additional fees, at least twenty (20) days in advance of such use. Other than at those times when the School District or City have scheduled priority usage, the Open Space shall be available after school hours, on weekends and on holidays for the benefit of the public including organized sports leagues and city -sanctioned events. Section 6. Miscellaneous. Any notice which is required or permitted to be given by any provision of this Agreement, may be given by hand delivery, by any overnight courier service providing dated evidence of delivery, or by U.S. Certified mail return receipt requested. Each notice shall be addressed as follows: if to the City: City of Hermosa Beach Attn: City Manager 1321 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 with a copy to: (City's attorney) if to the School District: Hermosa Beach City School District Attn: Superintendent 1645 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 with a copy to: Breon, O'Donnell, Miller et al Attn: David Miller 2550 Via Tejon Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 The City and the School District may each designate different addresses for the receipt of notice by delivering notice of any such change of address to the other party. Notices shall be deemed given as of the date of delivery. B. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The signature page of any counterpart may be detached therefrom without impairing the legal effect of the signature(s) thereon provided such signature page is attached to any other counterpart identical thereto except having additional signature pages executed by other parties to this Agreement attached thereto. 5 C. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any questions arising hereunder shall be construed and determined according to such laws. D. Headings. Headings at the beginning of each numbered section of this Agreement are solely for the convenience of the parties and are not a part of this Agreement. E. Time. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. F. Entire Agreement. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements between the parties with respect to the matters contained in this Agreement. Any waiver, modification, consent or acquiescence with respect to any provision of this Agreement shall be set forth in writing and duly executed on behalf of the party to be bound thereby. No waiver by any party of any breach hereunder shall be deemed a waiver of any other or subsequent breach. G. No Other Inducement. The making, execution and delivery of this Agreement by the parties hereto have been induced by no representations, statements, warranties or agreements other than those expressly set forth herein. H. Conflicts of Laws. As between the City and the School District, in the administration of this Agreement, in the event that there is a conflict in the laws that govern the City and the laws that govern the School District, the more restrictive law regulating or effecting either party shall apply. e IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Agreement as of the date first written above. ATTEST: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Citzt,L gide City Attorney City of Hermosa Beach APPROVED AS TO FORM: a municipal corporation By: Printed Name: HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, A regularly organized and existing school district under the laws of the State of California Breon, O'Donnell, Miller et al By: Printed Name: DS lq ,'n Gaul e}, 7 L .44.4_ A> 444 4 it.4.4.1y 1•Lt. //� 9�` November 25, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 14, 1991 CALL FOR BIDS FOR REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM STORAGE SHED LOCATED AT CLARK FIELD Recommendation: 1. It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to solicit bids for the removal of hazardous waste from Clark Stadium. 2. Authorize staff to issue addendum as necessary. Background: Located in the southwest corner of Clark Stadium is an unreinforced masonry building. The building has been used for a number of years by the City's Park Department for storage of fertilizers, herbicides and other chemicals related to park maintenance. In 1990 the City of Hermosa Building Department identified this building as an unreinforced masonry building. For seismic safety purposes, the building requires structural modifications. The Parks and Recreation Commission after reviewing the building recommended that it be demolished because of cost and concerns related to children playing in the area. The building presently contains very old containers of park maintenance chemicals. The process of removal of hazardous has been researched and coordinated with the Hermosa Beach Fire Department, Browning Ferris Industries, the County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services, the County Agricultural Commissioner and the Environmental Protection Agency. All these agencies agree that the materials in the shed are hazardous waste. In order to comply with the rules of these agencies the material must be disposed of in a specified manner. This requires the City to seek formal bids for the removal and disposal of this material by firms licensed to perform this work. A bid package has been prepared and we are now ready to go out to bid. The bid package is available for review in the office of the City Clerk. It is estimated that the removal costs will be approximately $7,000. This amount was unanticipated and unbudgeted. - 1 - At the time of contract award by City Council an appropriation will be necessary for the exact amount of the low bid. Respectfully submitted, Michael Flaherty Crew Leader pworks/ccsrhaz Concur: 4// /►.r l Glickman,lInterim Director of Public Works Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STATE OF CALIFORNIA Special Provisions and Bidding Specifications for Packaging, Hauling and Disposing of Hazardous Wastes General A. All bids are to be submitted in writing by Thursday, , at 2 P.M. in the Offices of the City Clerk, Room 201, at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. All bids will be placed in a sealed envelope marked "Hazardous Waste Removal". The bids shall have a ninety (90) day price hold. B. The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any irregularity or informality in any bid to the extent permitted by law. C. The contractor awarded the bid shall have all appropriate state and federal licenses, be fully bonded and insured (Min. $1,000,000 liability) and obtain a current Hermosa Beach business license. D. All work shall be performed Monday through Friday from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. All work must be completed within seven calander days from the Notice to Proceed. Specific A. Package, haul and dispose of all material listed on Attachment "A". B. Provide for the City all the appropriate document (i.e. manifest sheet, data sheets etc.) Provide for the City written instructions regarding notification of all appropriate local, state and federal agencies. Notify all appropriate agencies, copying back the City. Note The City of Hermosa Beach will obtain a "Provisional EPA #, site specific for Clark Stadium, 861 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. pworks/rfphazw ATTACHMENT "A" HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INVENTORY AS OF MARCH 1991 PRODUCT NO. UNIT AMOUNT DOW PON M GRASS KILLER EPA Reg. #464-402 2 BOXES (12 LBS.) CHEMGRO DEXON USDA Reg. #3125-154 1 BAG ( 3 LBS.) COOKE GOPHER MIX EPA Reg. #909 -2 -AA 1 CONTAINER ( 1 LB.) VESTAL LPH EPA Reg. #1043-45 AC 1 BOTTLE (1/2 GAL.) AQUATAIN 2 BOTTLES (1 1/2 GAL.) VICHEM VI -PAR USDA Reg. #2853-36 3 BOTTLES ( 2 GALS.) CHEMAGRO BAYTEX USDA Reg. #3125-73 UNK LABEL "WEED BE GONE" NO EPA # ALCO DISCET NO EPA # WATER IN NO EPA # LACCO SPRED ZON A ST. Reg. #962-50160 AA EPA EST #962 -CA -1 2 BOTTLES (1 1/4 GAL.) 1 -BOTTLE ( 1 PINT) 1 BOTTLE ( 1/2 GAL.) 1 BOTTLE ( 1 GAL.) 3 _ CONTAINERS (12 GALS.) AQUA SOL by CERTIFIED LABS. NO EPA # 1 CONTAINER (30 GALS.) UNK WETTING AGENT 1 CONTAINER (30 GALS.) SNAIL PELLETS 1 BUCKET ( 5 GALS.) BANDINI SUPER TURF FERTILIZER 2 BUCKETS (10 GALS.) SAFETY SOL 1 BUCKET ( 5 GALS.) UNK WETTING AGENT 1 G.I. CAN (2 1/2 GALS.) RUSSELL CHEMICAL EMULSIBLE SPRAY OIL LIGHT MEDIUM ST. Reg. #11159-50041AA 1 CONTAINER (20 GALS.) WMC FLAKED MAGNESIUM CHLORIDE HEXAHYDRATE EPA EST #38754CA-01 EPA SLN #CA760139 CA Reg. #38754 -5001 -AA 13 BAGS-@ 80# (1040 LBS.) ALLIED CHEMICAL ANHYDROUS CALCIUM CHLORIDE CODE #060-7250 8 BAGS-@ 80# ( 640 LBS.) KITTEN & BEAR PY-1 pworks/inventry 2 GALLONS ADDITIONAL PARTIES/INFORMATION FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE REMOVAL 1. HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT, Ph. (213) 318-0326 Paul Hawkins, Hazardous Materials Coordinator "C" Shift 2. BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES, Ph. (1-800) 553-1972 Will send brochure, does not remove hazardous wastes. . DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TOXIC SUBSTANCE DIVISION, LONG BEACH Duty Officer - Ph. (213) 590-4868 State Officer - Ph. (916) 324-1781 Region 3, Denis Hume - Ph. (818) 567-3134/567-3000 Note: The City currently has a State issued, Department of Health Services EPA ID.# CAL 000036517, which is site specific, for 555 6th Street, Hermosa Beach, CA, for small quantity generated waste (paint, etc.). 4. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY - STATE OF CALIFORNIA David Preston/Cameron - Ph. (415) 744-1107 This agency will issue a 'provisional' EPA ID. # for Clark Stadium , 861 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. Additional information: Permitting information Region 9 EPA - Ph. (415) 744-2074 5. Marty Kasman, R.S., Environmental Health Officer. Hazardous Waste Control Program, Occupational Health Division, Environmental Management, 2615 South Grand Avenue, 6th Floor, #607, (213)744-3223. 6. Ron Allen, (213)534-2770, Los Angeles County Health Department. pworks/rfphazw 4 HAZARDOUS WASTE BID FORM Hazardous Waste Disposal Material: $ Labor: Taxes: TOTAL: $ Company Name/Address Contact ty/bfhazw - 1 - BIDDER LIST FOR REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 1. IT CORPORATION 336 West Anaheim Street Wilmington, CA 90744 Ph. (213) 830-1781 Att: Don Dookokyan 2. ROLLINS CHEM PAK 1848 E. 55th Street Los Angeles, CA 90058 Ph. (213) 585-5063 Att: Tom Doyle FAX (213) 585-9214 3. CHEMWASTE MANAGEMENT 107 S. Motor Avenue Azusa, CA 91702 Ph. (818) 334-9002 Att: Ron Scherdorf Carol Julian Ext.#232 (Customer Service) 4. CROSBY & OVERTON INC. 1610 W. 17th Street Long Beach, CA 90813 Ph. (213) Att: Hector Salceda/George Cardile 5. CALIFORNIA CHEMICAL DISPOSAL INC. 1815 East 0 Street Wilmington, CA 90744 Ph. (213) 961-9326 Att: Andy 6. UNITED PUMPING SERVICE INC. 14016 E. Valley City of Industry, CA 91746 Ph. (818) 961-9326 Att: Mickey Yarak 7. ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMICS, INC. 6437 E. Alondra Blvd. Paramount, CA 90723 Ph. (213) 529-8155 Att: Ralph J. McCaffrey - 2 //..P- .Y9 January 15, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 28, 1992 SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM 1R RECOMMENDATION TO REJECT ATTACHED PROPOSAL FOR BUDGETED PURCHASE OF PARKING ENFORCEMENT VEHICLES In addition to the published NOTICE INVITING BIDS, SPECIFICATIONS & the NOTICE INVITING BIDS, were sent to: Pacific Equipment and Irrigation Ron Brooks, 19515 E. Walnut Drive, P.O. Box 8000, Industry, CA 91748-0800; and Frankson's, Inc. 1004 S. Glendale Avenue, Glendale, CA 91205; in accordance with our past practice of notifying known or listed vendors on file. As previously noted, only one proposal was received. CONCUR: H'en y L. Staten, Acting General Services Director Steve Wisniewski, Acting City Manager Respectfully submitted to, Henry L. Staten, Acting General Services Director by 0.444-(4-14-- Michele .7.44-c - - Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Viki Copeland, Director Finance Department ..Ut LEMENTHi INFORMATION ir December 5, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 14, 1992 RECOMMENDATION TO REJECT ATTACHED PROPOSAL, FOR BUDGETED PURCHASE OF PARKING ENFORCEMENT VEHICLES Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1) reject the attached proposal for the purchase of four (4) or more "cushman" type parking enforcement vehicles, and; 2) direct staff to consider alternative type vehicles, for use by Parking Enforcement, and re -bid the purchase. Background: At their regularly scheduled meeting of June 26, 1990, the City Council approved the revised 1991 - 1992 budget for the City of Hermosa Beach. Approval of $50,000 for the purchase of Parking Enforcement replacement vehicles, was included in the adopted budget. The City has not purchased replacement vehicles, since 1987. On October 24, and October 31, 1991, a NOTICE INVITING BIDS for "gasoline, on -road three -wheeled vehicles for parking enforcement" (attached), was published in the Easy Reader. Only one bid, from FRANKSON's (attached), was received. The bid was publicly opened and read aloud at 2:00 PM, on November 21, 1991. Analysis: As described in the attached NOTICE INVITING BIDS, the bid was to include "Four (4) or more new, current -model, gasoline, on -road three -wheeled vehicle or parking enforcement, at a cost not to exceed $50,000. Based on the current total price, including allowance, the cost for four (4) vehicles would be $57,956.00. This is well above the advertised bidding specs. Therefore, Staff requests a re -bidding, in order to stay within the amount budgeted. The primary shortfall to retaining these vehicles, is the environmental factor. None of our Cushman vehicles meet the new California emission control laws, and these models are not legal for sale, unless modified. 1 11' Each of the eight (8) vehicles are driven an average of 12 to 15 hours per day/yearly. The use of these vehicles,not only contributes negatively to the environment, but the City has already experienced loss of field manpower hours (IOD's), due to the non-compliant condition (fumes) of the vehicles. The two (2) available suppliers of these type of vehicles, Pacific Equipment & Irrigation, and Go -4 -it, have modified and upgraded their vehicles to meet or exceed emission control restrictions. Alternatives: 1. Authorize the purchase of only (1), or (2), or (3) vehicles. CONCUR: en Gen y L. ral S aten, Acting vices Director Steve Wisniewski, Acting City Manager 2 Respectfully submitted to, Henry L. Staten, Acting General Services Director by Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Viki Copeland, Director Finance Department FRANKSON's PROPOSAL 1,0. City of 21ermosa r1?eack Civic Center. 1315 Valley Drive. Hermosa Bead CaWorn a 90254-3885 Run dates: October 24, 1991 & October 31, 1991 City of Hermosa Beach NOTICE INVITING BIDS GASOLINE, ON -ROAD THREE -WHEELED VEHICLES FOR PARKING ENFORCEMENT NOTICE---IS-HEREBY-GIVEN-that---sealed-bids---wi l—be--rec-ei-ved-at-the office of the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive, Room 201, until 2:00 PM on Thursday, November 21, 1991, for up to five (5) gasoline driven, on -road three -wheeled vehicles for parking enforcement, in accordance with requirements and minimum specifications. The bids will be publicly opened and read aloud in the Council Chamber, City Hall, at 2:00 PM on Thursday, November 21, 1991. Each bid must be submitted on the forms furnished by the City. Proposal Forms, requirements and minimum specifications may be obtained at the General Services Department, Basement of City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive any irregularities in a bid, and to award the sale. The bid will be awarded to the supplier who best provides a product meeting the City's needs. DATED: October 17, 1991 Henry L. Staten Acting Director, General Services BID OPENING LOG SHEET .NTNG CE iEfQAL SEIQVICeS r No. Q4-R0Pi-D._ NR EE OHES.LEO -J1CLE ,ERS NAME BID BOND ANIOUNT OF BID S I .D IT RICE ' /6, cw)1114E`}T- __ Di S co U tT : 1 “3 75 2cNPr�E of : - F_AcN ,' 1 , 3 r7 n TR Pt DF 41.04)4 $ %S • 0 "dor&L pF A /E-mck.E_ : I y`� � 9 • cc) Qji OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK • 1315 Valley Drive • Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 4 • C to of 2iermosar2?eaek Civic Center. 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach California 90254-3885 PROPOSAL FORM r'-..---rr.:.►- ! .% . - r_,-- . .-..w. - �....�,..:.. ... .�. ...-.+..+++.... GASOLINE, ON -ROAD, POLICE VEHICLES FOR PARKING ENFORCEMENT" PROPOSAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF___THE,_CITY "—OF-HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA To furnish and deliver to the City of Hermosa ,Beach the._.following --new--and unused, -currently -in -production vehicle, in accordance withthe at_tched-specifa.cat>i•ons-a-t a cost. nav%sto "exc'eed' $50,000: Four (4) or more new, current -model, gasoline, on -road three -wheeled vehicles for parking enforcement. Price: $ /6/2/.SO Applicable discount, if - any - $ 4/4/97.7s Trade-in allowance (see attached information our (4) vehicles) Allowance .4116/4.j QQ. ,' / Total $ /LS9.60 TERMS 2 % /0 (LI,! -4-J .. �o WARRANTY if ,'V� �� ,�.,./(} '� fr MAKE GO _- % MODEL P— 3 S � �f�'�'' '' ',A r!�'r'`b,9."+ Delivery date, on or before - CI Q � 0�2 199 L �> �r nermoce Sancti NOTE: Price shall be the net total price per unit incl'd'ng the . 8.25% sales tax, if applicable. The City is exempt from `i. federal excise tax and an exemption certificate will be fufn�%shed_' to. the successful bidder. All prices shall be F.O.B. City Yard, located a 555 6th Street, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. The following specifications shall be filled in completely on the vehicle(s) offered and will be taken into consideration by the City in evaluating the bids. The award, if any, will be made to that bidder who submits the best bid meeting the City's needs and is in all particulars a responsible party. The City reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive any minor irregularities and to award the sale as may best serve the interest of the City. Any deviation should be itemized clearly and set forth in a letter accompanying this bid. 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INFORMATION ON CUSHMANS AVAILABLE FOR TRADE-IN 'ear Make Vin/fr License # Mileage .983 OMC I-CMH218XDL003681 89J93 26698 / 6;470. .983 OMC 1CUMH2185DL003670 89J92 28563 SeU2 .985 OMC 577005-146966C 97J51 29405 /76.110 ...."..",........."4............*,,. if.,.....r,f,..... - .6 985 OMC 577009-145934 97J50 35505/06c, ,35-0 Each bid shall be submitted in a sealed envelope: ADDRESSED: City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive, Room 201 Hermosa .Beach, _CA -90254 PLAINLY MARKED: SEALED BID: GASOLINE, ON -ROAD THREE WHEELED VEHICLES FOR PARKING ENFORCEMENT. Opening Date&- T=ime: -M November` 2i--- 99r`;`"' 2Tt10"'P 1 '�"' DATED THIS DAY OF NAME OF BIDDER PER 1991 BUSINESS ADDRESS /DCS L/ CITY, STATE, & ZIP CODE 1 7 '} TELEPHONE NUMBER /3- 2 6/.5 - 9 9 5 3 ` SPECIFICATIONS FOR GASOLINE, ON -ROAD THREE -WHEELED VEHICLE FOR PARKING ENFORCEMENT )TICE: Bidder shall complete the right-hand column indicating specifically the size and/or make and model of all components_ on_ whi.ch_he/she _is bidding.., ._Return.._this information with the bid form to the City Clerk's Office prior to the time indicated on the notice inviting bids. :NERAL: The specifications presented are the MINIMUM --ac•c•epta•ble—to -t-he-FCiity3- otf—HermoWaeach':'Vehicles shall be equipped with standard and regular parts and equipment including, but not limited to, the following special considerations: !quirements and Minimum Specifications BODY 3 wheel, fiberglass cab w/ seat belt; large windows electric gear drive wiper blade; steel box & cover-- w/gas spring lid assist; outside rear-view mirrors, (2); rear bumper; horn; ammeter; gas gauge; sound treatment; floor mat; speedometer; headlights; stop/taillights; high visi- bility stoplight; turn sig- nals; door set, roof light mounting bracket set. Characteristics of Offered item BRAKING Service: Heavy-duty hydrau- lic internal expanding on all three wheels, or disc braking mechanism protected from sand, dirt, water. COLOR Police blue & white DIMENSIONS Not to exceed 120 " length 70" height. Clearance: Minimum inter- secting aisle: 84" 5 6%' Outside clearance circle: 17' Inside clearance circle: 36" 5 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM Charging:"`Heavy-dutTal ter- nator. 7: _ Lights:_ Two -sealed beam headlights; dimmer switch; self -cancelling turn si- nals ;-comb:na;tion-.,.emergency. flashers/s.toplights-. Starting: .1-2_ volt gear drive starting motor; interlock prevents starter from turning_over_,unless clutch is depressed, -and/or vehicle is in neutral or in park. Wiring: Wiring harness with abrasion -resistant loom; multiple plug-in connectors for accessories. Frame: Heavy-duty carbon steel channel frame; front bumper. - i. PERFORMANCE Rated capacity: 1200 lbs. Speed (maximum): 39 mph POWER Engine: 4 -cycle, 22 hp. Clutch: Commercial only, (if manual transmission) Differential: Anti -friction bearings throughout. Governor: Centrifugal fly - ball type. Transmission: H -Shift pat- tern; 3 speeds forward & 1 reverse; synchromesh in second and high, and/or automatic with reverse. ;j . SEAT One -passenger, vinyl -clad seat with backrest; hip restraints. . STEERING Front wheel onl 0.SUSPENSION 6 Front: Leading link -type - supported by two tension springs; shock absorbers Rear: Two multiple leaf- 7.!_spFing; shock absorb- _ . o4'. a 11.TIRES**-- 570 x 8 (load range C) 12.MODIFICATIONS Dome light -END- 77-5-3 Sc A 13 ha_Lt_e:. 7 iendlf, IFIcAT.IC.XS ----FOR BODY 3rl heel dgsig . wither; ubeguard':22.1/.2'.1.tubular_steel.frame-and.cab;.Extradarge-vvindows-for • - gy= e'-'*ftesaa-60 FRANICSON'S INC. Established 1946 Gas & Electric Vehicles Turf & Industrial Commercial Mowers Small Engine Specialists SALES • SERVICE • PARTS For Most Makes DENNIS REINHARD 1004 S. Glendale Avenue Glendale.CA-91205 (213) 245-9453 (818) 247-0306 •••••••• NOTICE INVITING BIDS Run dates: January 23, & January 30, 1992 City of Hermosa Beach NOTICE INVITING BIDS AAS0LINE; `ON=ROAD"`THREE=WHEELED"VEHTCL"ES—FOR PARKING ENFORCEMENT— -- — NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids will be received at the office of the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive, Room 201, until 2:00 PM on Thursday, February 20, 1992, for up to five (5) gasoline driven, on -road three -wheeled vehicles for parking enforcement, in accordance with requirements and minimum specifications. The bids will be publicly opened and read aloud in the Council Chamber, City Hall, at 2:00 PM on Thursday, February 20, 1992. Each bid must be submitted on the forms furnished by the City. Bid Forms, requirements and minimum specifications may be obtained at the General Services Department, Basement of City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive any irregularities in a bid, and to award the sale. The bid will be awarded to the supplier who best provides a product meeting the City's needs. DATED: January 6, 1992 Henry L. Staten Acting Director, General Services /Z1/4;?//9 January 22, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 28, 1992 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMO TO JANUARY 14, 1992 MEMO GREENBELT PARKING LOT - DRIVEWAY CLOSURE In addition to the recommendation contained in the staff report presented at the City Council meeting held January 14, 1992 it is recommended as follows: 1. Design and install entranceway signs constructed of wood and having carved letters rather than the standard metal highway signs. These signs will blend in better with the surrounding landscaped areas. 2. Add to the parking restrictions, "No Parking, 2:00 AM to 6:00 AM, ALL VEHICLES". This restriction was considered at the joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting held December 12, 1991. 3. Consider the permanent closure of the southerly driveway by constructing concrete curb along Valley Drive rather than the use of telephone poles and/or railroad ties as previously recommended. This is suggested since it is contemplated that in future considerations of the parking lot development this entrance will most likely not be utilized. Respectfully Submitted, Concur: (21.Z6j lliam Glican Steve Wisniewski Interim Public Works Director ty/supgreen Interim City Manager - 1 - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1 S January 8, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 14, 1992 GREENBELT PARKING LOT - DRIVEWAY CLOSURE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to close the driveway entrance to the Greenbelt Parking Lot at Valley Drive and 11th Street and to post signs at the entrance to the lot North of 11th Place restricting parking by prohibiting certain vehicles. - Background: At the Special City Council meeting held jointly with the Planning commission on December 12, 1991, discussion was held concerning parking alternatives on the Greenbelt South of Pier Avenue. Staff is currently preparing a report to be considered by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission, the Planning Commission and lastly by the City Council. Staff is of the opinion that a concensus was reached at the joint meeting requesting staff to consider the closure of one of the two entrances to the parking area and to erect signs prohibiting trailors, and other large vehicles from parking on the lot. Staff field checked the lot and determined that the existing signing along the perimeter streets directs traffic to the entrance between Pier and 11th Place. Staff believes this entrance should remain and the southerly entrance should be. closed since this driveway required vehicles to intrude further into the residential neighborhood. In closing this entrance, it is planned to install telephone poles and/or railroad ties together with the placement of potted trees and shrubs. In order to restrict parking of certain vehicles on the lot it was determined that Section 19-80 of the Municipal Code grants the authority to the City Manager to order signs be erected indicating prohibitions, limitations and restrictions of parked or standing vehicles on City property. Signs stating the following are proposed to be erected at the lot entrance. "Restricted Parking, No Parking At Any Time "Tow -Away" Tractors, Trailers, Trucks In Excess Of 2 Tons, Boats And Boat Trailers. H.B.M.C., Section 19-80". The final impact of this work is of a minor nature and can be absorbed in the current Public Works Budget. - 1 - 1 s Alternatives: 1. Direct staff to close the northerly driveway. 2. Direct staff to not modify the lot circulation until the staff report has been considered by the Commission and City Council. Respec#Lfully Submitted, Concur: W7liam Glic an, Interim Steve Wisniewski, Interim P lic Works Director City Manager pworks/rrowdriv e---74 za 8/9.� January 8, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 14, 1992 GREENBELT PARKING LOT - DRIVEWAY CLOSURE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to close the driveway entrance to the Greenbelt Parking Lot at Valley Drive and 11th Street and to post signs at the entrance to the lot North of 11th Place restricting parking by prohibiting certain vehicles. Background: At the Special City Council meeting held jointly with the Planning commission on December 12, 1991, discussion was held concerning parking alternatives on the Greenbelt South of Pier Avenue. Staff is currently preparing a report to be considered by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission, the Planning Commission and lastly by the City Council. Staff is of the opinion that a concensus was reached at the joint meeting requesting staff to consider the closure of one of the two entrances to the parking area and to erect signs prohibiting trailors, and other large vehicles from parking on the lot. Staff field checked the lot and determined that the existing signing along the perimeter streets directs traffic to the entrance between Pier and 11th Place. Staff believes this entrance should remain and the southerly entrance should be closed since this driveway required vehicles to intrude further into the residential neighborhood. In closing this entrance, it is planned to install telephone poles and/or railroad ties together with the placement of potted trees and shrubs. In order to restrict parking of certain vehicles on the lot it was determined that Section 19-80 of the Municipal Code grants the authority to the City Manager to order signs be erected indicating prohibitions, limitations and restrictions of parked or standing vehicles on City property. Signs stating the following are proposed to be erected at the lot entrance. "Restricted Parking, No Parking At Any Time "Tow -Away" Tractors, Trailers, Trucks In Excess Of 2 Tons, Boats And Boat Trailers. H.B.M.C., Section 19-80". The final impact of this work is of a minor nature and can be absorbed in the current Public Works Budget. - 1 - 1 S Alternatives: 1. Direct staff to close the northerly driveway. 2. Direct staff to not modify the lot circulation until the staff report has been considered by the Commission and City Council. Respectfully Submitted, Concur: 4 W Liam Glic an, Interim Steve Wisniewski, Interim Public Works Director City Manager pworks/rrowdriv December 19, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 14, 1992 PLAN CHECKING AND INSPECTION FEES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Recommendation: 1. It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the proposed resolution for plan checking and inspection fees for public improvements. 2. It is recommended that the City Council approve the fees to be applied against funds on deposit and presently held by the City. Background: In the last nine months, the City has received six street improvement plans from private consultant engineers for checking. This represents a possible gain to the City of $9,469 in plan checking fees and inspection fees if approved by the City Council (See Attachment "A"). Five of these street improvement plans were prepared for locations where there was no previous curb and gutter existing. At the sixth location, the curb and gutter elevations had to be changed to allow for drainage. The engineering staff is aware that four more street improvement plans are being prepared for submittal to the City Public Works Department at this time. Analysis: Previously, the City has not been requiring street improvement plans for private developments within the City. In the past, the requirement for engineered street improvement plans has only been required for City street improvement projects. Due to the uniqueness of the community, many of the streets were constructed over sixty years ago of concrete which included concrete curbs. Thus, the requirement for engineered street improvement plans has not been needed on those streets. The decision to require engineered street improvement plans for any proposed construction project is under the control of the City Engineer in conformance with Section 29-10 of the City Code. That code section requires street improvements (when required) be constructed, as needed, between the centerline of the street and the right of way line; except under certain circumstances. For the small private development project where the property is only 25 to 30 feet wide, and where there is existing curb on both sides of the project to match the new curb to, there is not a need to spend funds on engineered plans. - 1 - tt On the streets where there is (1) no existing curbs and gutters, (2) drainage problems or (3) bits and pieces of unconnected curbs and gutter, there is a need for a comprehensive engineering analysis. These situations are now becoming typical for many of the new private developments on the asphalt concrete streets. The Public Works Department is in need of a process to handle the future influx of public street improvement plans. The engineering staff has already started an indexing system and a filing system to provide the necessary control procedures. An in-house training program on how to check improvement plans has also been started in order to broaden the City's capability to perform this function. The Public Works Department needs to have a plan checking fee schedule to cover costs, similar to the plan checking fees required in the Building Department. It is the intent of the City of Hermosa Beach to recover the cost of this plan checking service reasonably borne from the fees and charges levied in providing this service. The City staff recommends that the City fees, at this time, be based on the latest existing fee schedule as used by Los Angeles County Public Works Department in their Land Development Division. The fees will cover the cost of providing the plan checking service. Plan Checking Fees Estimated Construction Costs Plan Checking Fees $ 0 - $ 1,000 $350 $ 1,001 - $ 10,000 $350 + 6.0% over $1,000 $ 10,001 - $100,000 $890 + 3.3% over $10,000 $100,001 - $3,860 + 2.0% over $100,000 + $160 Large project adjustment cost Note: (1) Plan checking fees are to be rounded off to the nearest dollar (2) An additional checking fee of $150 per sheet will be assessed if more than five submittals are required. (3) Plans will not be approved until all checking fees have been paid. (4) The approved plans shall be on 24" x 36" mylar sheets. The above fees shall be used for the submittal of the following types of plans: 1. Street Improvement Plans 2. Sewer Improvement Plans 3. Storm Drain Improvement Plans 4. Grading Improvement Plans 5. Water Improvement Plans The Public Works Department also needs to have an inspection fee schedule to cover costs, similar to the inspection fees required in the Building Department. It is the intent of the City of Hermosa Beach to recover the cost of this inspection service reasonably borne from the fees and charges levied in providing this service. The City staff recommends that the City fees, at this time, be based on the latest existing fee schedule as used by Los Angeles County Public Works Department in their Land Development Division. The fees will cover the cost of providing the inspection service. Inspection Fees Estimated Construction Costs Inspection Fees $ -0- - $ 1,000 $ 145 $ 1,001 - $ 10,001 - $ 20,001 - $100,001 - Note: (1) (2) Summary: $ 10,000 $ 20,000 $100,000 $ 145 + 5.0% $ 595 + 4.0% $ 995 + 2.5% $2,995 + 2.0% over over over over $1,000 $10,000 $20,000 $100,000 Inspection fees are to be rounded off to the nearest dollar. Inspection fees are to be paid as a part of the plan checking fees. With the continuing construction that is taking place throughout the community, there is a need for the City to require that the streets and other public improvements be constructed properly. The Public Works Department can provide this service, however the service should pay its own way and not require funds from other sources in the budget. Alternatives: 1. Charge no fees and do the work free at no cost to developers. 2. Hire outside engineering consultants to do the work. 3. Hire outside plan checking consultants to do the work. 4. Let the developers continue to build any way they want with no engineering control over what they do. Respectfully submitted, Lynn Terry Deputy City Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: (341(At4C,44.— Viki Copeland Finance Director pworks/ccsrpcfe Concur: illiam Gli'kman, Interim irector of Public Works Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager ueIdutT;s/sx.zoMd u�iu ZNaWHOKssrd T6/0T/V0 a3NOIs UV'IAN T6/O1/170 aanIa a i II IAN T6/OT/1h-£#d0 T6/V0/17-Z#d0 16/8Z/£-T#d0 T6/60/T"-£#d0 T6/TO/17-Z#dO T6/8T/£-T#dO ZL£ $ £Z9 $ (DNIddVN / ONI1 A2InSu rIOn?I) 'Ha A2TIVA/'SSS HLN3A3'I3 TLt/TZ 'ON dVN 'IaO2JVd 055'5 $ 9£18# NV'Id / / a3NOIs HVIANi T6/TO/50 a3AI30au UWIAN 16/TO/5-£#dO T6/8Z/£-Z#d0 t6/9Z/£-T#d0 16/TO/5-£#d0 T6/LZ/£-Z#dO T6/8T/£-T#dO Ot Z $ 179V $ (ONIuaaNIONa IVId) 'ZS HSN33SXIS 30 HZfOs ,05Z - 3AIua yiwo'I 006'Z S 5£18# NV1d T6/5Z/vo a3NOIS ?MAN T6/5Z/170 a3AIaDa 1 2IK'IAW t6/5Z/v-b#d0 T6/17Z/t'-£#d0 T6/8Z/£-Z#d0 t6/ZZ/Z-T#d0 T6/5Z/17-14d0 T6/8t/i7-£#d0 T6/8Z/Z-Z#dO T6/ZZ/Z-T#dO Z££ $ i,LS $ (ONI2i33NION3 IVld) anRia LaSNns UNV ' LS H1LNaI 0£L'17 $ tET8# Wi'Id T6/£Z/170 a3NOIS UV'IAN T6/£Z/v0 a3AI3032I UVIAN T6/ZZ/V-£#dO T6/OT/t-Z#d0 T6/9Z/£-T#dO t6/Lt/i'-£#dO T6/i70/fig-Z#d0 t6/OZ/Z-T#dO 506 S 9tT'T $ ('OOSSv '3 NawavS 't"3) 3AI2ia YNO'I '3 'IS HJLNaIL 05L'LT $ ££18# NV'1d t6/Zt/£0 a3NOIS UVIAN T6/TT/£0 a3nI3032i HWIAN t6/TT/£-5#d0 T6/50/£-V#d0 T6/5T/Z-£#dO T6/6Z/t-Z#d0 16/TZ/T-T#d0 T6/LO/£-5#d0 T6/8Z/Z-i7#dO t6/90/Z-£#d0 T6/£Z/1-Z#dO T6/t7T/t-t#dO 6Zt 'T $ £6L'T S (ONI I aNION3 ODNY'I) 3OK'Id ZS1II / 'aAV 3ummuv ''ZS ISHII 05£' L£ $ Z£T8# NV'Id / / a3MOIs UVIAW 16/50/£0 a3AI30au II IAN 06/£T/ZT-Z#dO 06/t7O/ZT-T#dO 06/ZT/Zt-Z#dO 06/5Z/OT-T#dO £59 $ 8£6 $ (ONI2I33NION3 IKId) 'ZS i MOd '3 'IS 144OZ 0517'TT $ 1£T8# NV'Id 'IVNIOIUO 2i'n Aw a3NunIaH INIUd N3 HO aanIaO3u 5333 SNI Id ) 32H3 NOIIDadSNI / ONI}I03H0 Weld smuza LHswsA011dWI Iaalus (' 00 ONI2i33NION3 SSOO a3s6'LdIZS3 M NN NV'Id "sails (NV 'ON NVId 1 RESOLUTION NO. 92- 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 3 90-5422, SCHEDULE 5, ADDING PLAN CHECKING AND INSPECTION FEES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17• 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 90-5422 was approved by the City Council to establish a Master Schedule of service charges and fees; and WHEREAS, with the continuing construction that is taking place throughout the community, there is a need for the City to require that the streets and other public improvements be constructed properly; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Hermosa Beach to recover costs related to the regulation of the construction of public improvements required for the development of private property; and WHEREAS, the engineering staff of the Public Works Department is now providing both plan checking services and construction inspection services to control and regulate the construction of public improvements for private property development; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Resolution No. 90-5422, Schedule 5, is hereby amended to add "PLAN CHECKING and INSPECTION FEES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS". SECTION 2. That the City fees be based on the latest existing fee schedule used by the Los Angeles County Public Works Department in their land development Division, as modified in Section 3. 1 SECTION 3. That the "PLAN CHECKING AND INSPECTION FEES FOR 2 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS" be established as provided below: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Plan Estimated Construction Costs $ 0 - $ 1,001 - $ 10,001 - $100,001 - Note: (1) (2) (3) (4) $ 1,000 $ 10,000 $100,000 Checking Fees Plan Checking Fees $350 $350 + 6.0% over $1,000 $890 + 3.3% over $10,000 $3,860 + 2.0 over $100,000 + $160 Large project adjustment cost Plan checking fees are to be dollar An additional checking fee assessed if more than five Plans will not be approved been paid. The approved plans rounded off to the nearest of $150 per sheet will be submittals are required. - until all checking fees have shall be on 24" X 36" mylar sheets. The above fees shall be used for the submittal of the following types of plans: 16 1. Street Improvement Plans 2. Sewer Improvement Plans 17 3. Storm Drain Improvement Plans 4. Grading Improvement Plans 5. Water Improvement Plans 18 19 20 21 Inspection Fees Estimated Construction Costs 22 it $ -0- - $ 1,000 23 24 25 $ 1,001 $ 10,001 $ 20,001 - $ 10,000 - $ 20,000 - $100,000 Inspection Fees 145 145 + 5.0% over $1,000 $ 595 $ 995 + 4.0% over $10,000 + 2.5% over $20,000 26 II $100,001 - $2,995 + 2.0% over $100,000 27 Note: (1) Inspection fees are to be rounded off to the nearest dollar. 28 (2) Inspection fees are to be paid as a part of the plan checking fees. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 4. That this Resolution shall apply to all deposits presently held by the City for plan checking services and inspection services. SECTION 5. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original Resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City council of said City in the minutes of the meeting in which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of January, 1992. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 011.6.t.L_ vew pworks/resoplan CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 0 -0? - December 12, 12, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 14, 1992 RECOMMENDATION TO PURCHASE METERS Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the purchase of sixty-one (61) "tamper -proof" Duncan meters, at a cost not to exceed $10,000, to replace a portion of the POM meters currently in use. Duncan is the sole source for this specific type of tamper proof meter and this purchase complies with Sec. 2-55 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Background: As part of a five (5) year plan, beginning in 1989, all POM model meters were to be replaced with Duncan model meters (see attached memo dated 10/17/89). At that time, approximately 900 of the 1700 meters throughout the City, were POM model. Currently, there are still approximately 800 POM meters that should be replaced. In the 1990-92 budget, $20,000 was budgeted for purchase of replacement meters, $10,000 per year. To date, no meters have been purchased for 1991-92, per direction from the City Manager., pending the results from the 90 day trial period of the new "electronic meters". Based on comments from merchants, patrons, and the General Service Officers, the electronic meters have visibility problems (especially during the day), which make seeing the displayed time or lapse of time difficult to see (see attached memos). Analysis: The problem we are experiencing with the POM meters, is the inability to prevent tampering and "time theft". The POM meters can be effectively tampered with to register up to the maximum hourly limit, without benefit of depositing the proper coins. In addition, when the meter is jammed or tampered with, it precludes the deposit of' coins, and reduces revenue. This problem is also prevalent in other cities, such as Redondo Beach, using the POM meters. Additionally, the POM meters cost approximately $200 each, plus shipping and handing. The Duncan meters cost less than $165 each, including shipping, and handling. In order to mitigate the revenue loss, wherever possible, POM meters in high volume use areas, are being exchanged with Duncan meters. However, almost half the meters, are still POM models. 1 As the replacement proceeds, it is therefore probable the City should realize an increase in revenue proportionate to the number of POM meters replaced. Staff, however, has no specific method to determine the amount of increase. It is estimated that replacing the remaining POM meters will cost $100,000 over the next four (4) years. Staff anticipates that portions of costs could well be subsidized by the increased revenue. Alternatives: 1. Purchase all the meters necessary to effect the changeover to Duncan meters. 2. Purchase a larger number of meters. CONCUR: en• L. Staten, Acting Gen-ral Se ices Director Steve Wisniewski, Acting City Manager Respectfully submitted to, Henry L. Staten, Acting General Services Director by /W 77;2 `/GO Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Viki Copeland, Director Finance Department Memo To: Richard Contreras From: V. Baivin Subject: Electronic Meters Date: October 10, 1991 ()()())()()()()()())()(()()((()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()() 00000000000) OOOOOOOOOOOOUOOOOOOOO I spoke with Officers Haire Grogan and Lombardo and all reported to me that the electronic type meters were hard to determine whether they were expired or not. They all exclaimed frustration with trying to read them from the direction of the Cushmans. If you drive down the street in the day time you can't see if they are colored red or gray unless you go around the back of the meter facing the sidewalk. - 1 - 7"b: 1-112.nr-y Fro c\ -+o -rd Con -Art r J \\ / 2) 9- oent-Y, C nse., SL tkr; 41� +\ Q 6r, E. 0•4'; c x3 c ncl Sv, pr'vi,Sor �. rn �_:.�c? �S c��.. �,��-'�- +.0 o.rvj w'1A-1,, "t' ,r1 �r rP�sb '�' ' 1ylcht T ko,V f"r13.-AG CIJJ '�� C•1 -\-\n‘_,1- 1 Q UV i +'^\ P r--AsS sS. pro.b Q_S C_'1 .? �So, 1�1,t1G�.l; �ii�IVt�rt f 0.r( -C � Q_ . � Bbl en -,� , U n VA `t 1�,Es�_ .vrA, nis C.. be Co r- r eL.\-(2J, I rec. ory\ry)znA- � �<? 1 / G ('��c7J W0:,"\' l�r•'�'� h� pro\ 'em -S Lu'r\-\- E)`G.,c. ror; To CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH J - Date From Kevin Northcraft ❑ For Necessary Action ❑ For Your Approval ❑ For Your Information ❑ For Your Comments ❑ Submit Recommendations ❑ Please Draft A Reply ❑ Note and send So Remarks ❑ For Your Signature ❑ Note and Return ❑ Note and File ❑ Per Our Conversation ❑ For File RINTING (213) 376-5737 RMOSA BEACH UESTED BY STATEN averse side of this sheet ❑ Bring In For Discussion Department, ❑ Per Your Request 54-0299. SOLE SOURCE 1 This Purchase Order is not valid without authorized signature. PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER 01b50 DELIVER MERCHANDISE TO CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH c/o RICHARD CONTRERAS 1035 VALLEY DR. HERMOSA BEACH,90254 Distribution Area: Warrant No.: UNIT PRICE TOTAL $143.97 $ 4.50 REMARKS: REPLACEMENT METERS FOR TAMPER P.O.M. METERS. ON GOING PROBLEM FOR ABOUT FIVE YEARS. FREE TIME PUT ON PARKING METERS WITH DRINKING STRAW. CONTACTED P.O.M. COMPANY AND THEIR TECHNICIANS ARE UNABLE TO CORRECT THIS PROBLEM. TAX $4,463.07 $ 139.50 $ 322.18 TOTAL $4,924.75 I her reques this ORIGINAL I hereby certify that this order is authorized z/N CITY MANAGER RECEIPT OF MATERIAL I hereby certify that the goods or services as specified hereon have been received and that the quantities and qualities are properly stated. By Date Funds Available S Date APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT This invoice approved for payment in the amount of $ Date RECEIVING COPY Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 January 10, 1992 e0-0-7-<0( //,2 �/9 i//5/9 Honorable Mayor Midstokke & City Council Members: RECEIVED JAN 1 S 1992 CITY MGR. oPrICE As an amendment to my letter dated Jan 6th, 1992 I have been notified by Mr. Wisniewski that my letter will be placed on the agenda of the January 14th, 1992 council meeting under "written. communications" and that the staff will be recommending that the council should not remove the requirement for the second door in the rear area. Since this is not a public meeting and I presume I will not be permitted to talk I would like to point out that in the council's and staff's efforts to justifiably separate business noise from residential intrusion, there has not been a requirement for double doors in other C.U.P's. Not one licensed entertainment establishment in Hermosa Beach has double doors; ie. The Comedy Magic Club, End Zone, Hennessey's Tavern, Pier 52, or Hermosa Saloon. I feel that by restricting the 40 year use of our door we have gone beyond any current C.U.P. requirement. It should also be. noted that until now the city staff has not backed or recommended si1Ch a requirement. Therefore, ram confused asto vtwhythnv have how chehge !their position. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Paul E. I-6nnessey Hennessey's Taverns, Inc. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 41c HENNESSEY'S TAVERNS, INCORPORATED CORPORATE OFFICE: 1845 SOUTH ELENA, SUITE 300, REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90277 - PHONE: (213) 540-2274 City of S2lermosa 1r3. eacli...) Paul E. Hennessey Hennessey's Taverns, Inc. 1845 South Elena, Suite 300 Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 January 7, 1992 RE: Conditional Use Permit - The Lighthouse Dear Mr. Hennessey: This is in response to your letter received January 6, 1992 requesting that City Council reconsider the requirement for a double door in the rear entrance of the Lighthouse. Your letter will be placed on the agenda of the January 14, 1992 regular Council meeting under "Written Communications." This will allow the Council to consider and comment on your request. As I'm sure you are aware, the back door is an emergency exit and cannot be locked to prevent persons from leaving the premises during business hours. Although the door might not be used as an entrance, customers can conceivabily use the door as an exit while bands are playing unless there was a doorman posted at the location. I believe that the personnel costs of posting a doorman would far exceed the cost of the installation of a second door. Based on these facts, Staff will be recommending that Council should not remove the requirement for the second door in the rear area. Steve S. Wisniewski Interim City Manager Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 January 3, 1992 RECEIVED JAN 0 6 1992 CITY MGR. OFFICE Honorable Mayor Midstokke & City Council Members: I am writing to you as a follow up of my letter dated November 13th, 1991. At that time I explained that the City Staff and the sound engineers.were in agreement that no sound was emitting out of the back door. I failed to make it clear that we had also agreed to limit the use of the back door for loading and unloading of band equipment only, which would obvious be during the time when there are not any bands playing. The back door is not used as an entrance for the patrons or employees. I have been notified by Mr. Wisniewski in a letter dated December 11th, 1991 that the council has considered my request and unanimously rejected the removal of the requirement. I hope that with this explanation of our prior agreement that the back door is always closed and locked, thereby restricting it's use, that you would reconsider your decision so that we can settle our C.U.P and move forward to improving the downtown and business environment in Hermosa Beach. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, L/ Paul E. Hennessey Hennessey's Taverns, Inc. HENNESSEY'S TAVERNS, INCORPORATED CORPORATE OFFICE: 1845 SOUTH ELENA, SUITE 300, REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90277 - PHONE: (213) 540-2274 City of Hermosa 1r3. eaclt..) Paul E. Hennessey Hennessey's Taverns, Inc. 1845 South Elena, Suite 300 Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 December 18, 1991 RE: Conditional Use Permit - The Lighthouse Dear Mr. Hennessey: This is in response to your letter received December 17, 1991 requesting information about the double door issue. I am not sure who or what originally led me to believe that there was a double door arrangement installed at the front entrance of the Lighthouse. I did review the tape from the last Council discussion on this issue. During that discussion the Planning Director and Councilmembers talked about the belief that the double doors were installed at the front, but this was neither confirmed nor denied when you, addressed the Council. With regard to the installation of a door in the rear hallway, I can assure you that this would not be a fire hazard or a violation of the building and safety code when installed in accordance with the applicable codes. Prior to installation, I encourage you to have the contractor submit a plan to the Buildindg Departmetn for proper review and permit issuance. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you need any further assistance or information regarding this matter. Steve S. Wisniewski Interim City Manager Steve S. Wisniewski Interim City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear Mr. Wisniewski: RECEIVED DEC 1 7 1991 CITY MGR. OFFICE This in response to your letter dated December 11, 1991. I understand that the council has unanimously rejected my request that the condition requiring double doors be removed. What concerns me is that you stated that during your inspection you noted that there was not a double door installed at the front entrance as required and as supposedly reported. I want to clarify that there has never been a double door at the front entrance in the ten years that I have owned the Lighthouse Cafe and to the best of my knowledge there has never been double doors in the forty years that the Lighthouse has been in Hermosa Beach. I have never stated or written anything to suggest that there are double doors at the entrance. Please furnish me with any information that the city has from an agent associated with the Lighthouse Cafe that has led you to believe different. It is of great concern to me that someone is "reporting" incorrect facts to you and the council. Also, you stated that the council felt that the installation of a door in the framed opening me the Ic 1n a arca and the �r hall.. ouid 1 minim �/'/L... .g between UIv .SIL in Ili�1.�G arca and the rear hallway 1�YVulu r✓�. rilU .11l llUli: expense and would insure that noise would be contained. I would be interested to know whether that would constitute a fire hazard and would be in fact a violation of the building and safety code. Sincerely, Paul E. Hennessey cc: Hermosa Beach City Council Stephen Solomon, Esq. HENNESSEY'S TAVERNS, INCORPORATED CORPORATE OFFICE: 1845 SOUTH ELENA, SUITE 300, REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90277 - PHONE: (213) 540-2274 THOMAS W. STOEVER WILLIAM B. BARR CHARLES S. VOSE CONNIE COOKE SANDIFER JAMES DUFF MURPHY ROGER W. SPRINGER EDWARD W. LEE HERIBERTO F. OIAZ JANICE R. MIYAHIRA BETH S. BERGMAN LAW OFFICES OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1000 SUNSET BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 (213) 250-3043 December 17, 1991 Stephen Warren Solomon, Esq. Solomon, Saltsman & Jamieson 426 Culver Boulevard Playa del Rey, CA 90293 TELECO PIER (213) 482-5336 RECEIVED DEC 1 9 1991 CITY MGR. OFFICE Re: Hennessey/Lighthouse - City of Hermosa Beach Dear Mr. Solomon: This letter is transmitted in reply to your December 11, 1991 correspondence regarding the above referenced matter. As you may be aware, your client submitted a letter to each councilmember requesting deletion of the "double doors" requirement. At this time, there does not appear to be any support on the City Council for the removal of the condition requiring "double doors." As you will recall, the City Council reconsidered its decision concerning the restriction on hours for live music. I think that this reconsideration and removal of the condition was consistent with the evidence presented at the hearing. The requirement for the "double doors" appears to be supported by the evidence presented at the public hearings. It is also my understanding that the installation of a second door can be done with minimal expense. I suggest that your client contact the interim City Manager if he has any questions on how the double door can be installed with minimal cost. If you would like to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me. I hope the entire matter can be resolved without the necessity of litigation. Very truly yours, Vae Charles S. Vose of OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE CSV:ilf cc: Steve Wisniewski, City Manager 7312 • City of `�lermosarl3eaclt�`� Paul E. Hennessey Hennessey's Taverns, Inc. 1845 South Elena, Suite 300 Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 December 11, 1991 RE: Conditional Use Permit - The Lighthouse Dear Mr. Hennessey: This is in response to your letter of request dated November 13, 1991 asking that City Council rescind the condition requiring double doors in the rear hallway. I personally inspected The Lighthouse on the evening of December 3, 1991 in order to report the actual conditions to Council. I informed them that the rear hallway was designed with a right angel turn as you had indicated. Council considered and discussed your request and unanimously rejected the removal of the requirement. Council felt that the installation of a door in the framed opening between the main lounge area and the rear hallway would be minimum expense and would insure that noise would be contained. During my inspection I noted that there was not a double door installed at the front entrance as required and reported as being present. I assume that this is merely an oversight and will be corrected. Steve S. Wisniewski Interim City Manager Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City of Hermosa Beach 1315 :'allay Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RECEIVED NOV 1 8 W9 CITY MGR. OrFICE November 13, 1991 Honorable Mayor Midstokke & City Council Members: I am writing you in hopes that we can resolve our problems without any more unnecessary expense to the city or myself. At the C.U.P. review for the Lighthouse on November 12th, it appears that there was some confusion regarding what we had agreed to in our C.U.P agreement for the Lighthouse. There has been lengthy discussion with the City Staff and the Planning Commission regarding your concern about the double doors. It has been pointed out at the meetings that the layout of the Lighthouse is such that the area the bands play in is separated from the back by the following items; a wall, a stairway, and a bearing wall. Also, there are two bathrooms on the left which consist of four consecutive walls and the rear wall which is a one foot prick wal!. On the right there is a wa!kin refrigerator, the kitchen and storage area. The rear hallway has a sharp right angle and a low seven foot ceiling. Therefore it was determined that no sound was emitting from that maze of brick and wood. Any sound heard from out of the back was determined to be coming from the skylights, which have already been sealed and sound proofed. In addition, a solid steel door has been installed in the rear exit with a self closer and panic hardware. We can agree with the council that we would not use the rear door as an entrance and that it would remain locked from the outside and would only be able to be opened from the inside with panic hardware for obvious fire regulations. HENNESSEY'S TAVERNS, INCORPORATED CORPORATE OFFICE: 1845 SOUTH ELENA, SUITE 300, REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90277 - PHONE: (213) 540-2274 Installing another door in the narrow back hallway would create a fire and safety hazard, and it would hinder my staff in enforcing security in the rear of the building. Thank you for your consideration.. Sincerely, Paul E. Hennessey Hennessey's Taverns, Inc. cc: Charles W. Vose HENNESSEY'S TAVERNS, INCORPORATED CORPORATE OFFICE: 1845 SOUTH ELENA, SUITE 300, REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90277 - PHONE: (213) 540-2274 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council --55-23" January 21, 1992 Regular Meeting of January 28, 1992 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-3 AND ZONE CHANGE 91-2 LOCATION: 64 10TH STREET APPELLANT: KEVIN C. HEALY 64 10TH STREET PURPOSE: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF A PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN REDESIGNATION FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MD) AND ZONE CHANGE FROM C-2 TO R-2 Planning Commission Recommendation To deny the request and maintain the commercial designations. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that this item be continued to February 25, 1992, to expand the area of consideration to include the other half of lot 16 to the south of the subject property and also the lot to the east, by adoption.the attached resolution of intent. ft Alternatives A. Sustain the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the request and thereby maintain the commercial designations B. Approve the request as submitted by adopting the attached alternative resolution (general plan amendment) and introduction of the alternative ordinance (zone change). (This would create an undesirable situation of a "half -lot" with different designations than the other half) C. Consider the subject parcel in conjunction with the General Plan Land Use Element revision effort. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of December 3, 1991, considered staff's recommendation, alternatives, and the applicant's request and voted 5-0 to deny the request, thereby maintaining the commercial designations on this lot. For further background please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report and minutes. 1 5 Analysis Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report for the analysis. CONCUR: Michael Schubach PlanningDirector Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Attachments Respectfully Submitted: "t1— 764 Ken Robertson Associate Planner 1. Maps 2. Resolution of Intent to expand the area of consideration 3. Alternative Resolution to sustain P.C. decision to deny 4. Alternative Ordinance/Resolution to approve request 5. P.C. resolution, staff report, minutes 6. Public Notice Affidavit p/pcsrgp3 2 EXISTING LAND USE i3 10 th Street 30 30 42.4 10 th Court 30 9 th Street 30 II SUBJECT LOT GENERAL RETAIL / OFFICE MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL UNIT ABOVE 100 H E R M 0 S A A V E N U E 29,34 29,34 29;4 2944 29>34 294 29:.3:4 2944 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL UNITS. ZONING CODE DESIGNATION 2: 10 th Street 10 th Court 30 30 30 2:1 9 th Street 30 30 30 21 MI SUBJECT LOT C-2 100 H E R M 0 S A A V E N U E 60 -29.34 igq,44 29:,34 .29.34 29:.:24 _4. R-3 R-2 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 10 th Street 10 th Court 30 30 30 ISO 9 th Street 30 30 30 21 3 ® SUBJECT LOT GC GENERAL COMMERCIAL 100 H E R M 0 S A A V E N U E 24.34 29:34 29.34 MD MEDIUM DENSITY HD HIGH DENSITY A Ho HO Gc GC VPD HD C Liii GC £11 Ge 2 S.A V EN 2 W ct W 14.1 cis •-.I t4J GENERAL PLAN MAP MD HD: HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ID MD: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL GC: GENERAL COMMERCIAL OS: OPEN SPACE ZONING MAP RESOLUTION 92- A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO CONSIDER A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 10TH STREET INCLUDING LOTS 16 AND 17, BLOCK 10 HERMOSA BEACH TRACT WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on January 28, 1992, to consider a private request for a General Plan Amendment from General Commercial to Medium Density in conjunction with a zone change request for a portion of lot 16, and made the following findings: A. The existing and historic land use on the subject property is residential and the General Plan and Zoning are designated commercial; B. The property owner has submitted an application, including fees, for a zone change and general plan amendment that warrants consideration; C. The area of consideration should be expanded to include the commercially designated, but residentially used, properties both to the south and east of the applicant's property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby expand the area to include the entire lot 16, and the adjacent lot number 17, Block 10, Hermosa Beach Tract, for consideration of a General Plan Amendment and zone change. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1992, by: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK p/persint /'11, `� CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ALTERNATIVE RESOLUTION SUSTAINING P.C. DECISION RESOLUTION 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO SUSTAIN THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO DENY A REQUEST FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND A ZONE CHANGE FROM C-2, RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL, TO R-2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FOR THE PARCEL AT 64 10TH STREET LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE NORTHERLY 57 FEET OF LOT 16, BLOCK 10, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on an appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of the proposed General Plan amendment and zone change on January 28, 1992, and made the following Findings: A. The subject parcel's commercial designations are appropriate to provide the adequate depth for commercial development with frontage on Hermosa Avenue, and it has not been satisfactorily demonstrated that itis in the best interest of the City to change the commercial designations; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby sustain the Planning Commission's denial of the requested General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1992, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK AP A T ORM: CITY ATTORNEY ALTERNATIVE ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONE CHANGE ORDINANCE 92 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE ZONING MAP FROM C-2, RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL, TO R-2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FOR THE PARCEL AT 64 10TH STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. .WHEREAS, the. City Council held a public hearing on the proposed zone change on January 28, 1992, and made the following Findings: A. The subject parcel is used residentially and is appropriate for residential use as it is the second lot west of Hermosa Avenue, and is not tied to the Hermosa Avenue frontage lot; B. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the Staff Environmental Review Committee and the proposed zone change has been determined to qualify for a Negative Declaration; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain amendment of the zoning map as described as follows, and adopts an environmental negative declaration: SECTION 1. Zone change from C-2, Restricted Commercial, to R-2 Two -Family Residential the parcel at 64 10th Street, and legally described as the northerly 57 feet of lot 16, Block 10, Hermosa Beach Tract SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1992, by following vote: -/0 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CG4./„- ( lam p/pers64 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY -PI- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ALTERNATIVE RESOLUTION APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AT 64 10TH STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed zone change on January 28, 1992, and made the following Findings: A. The subject parcel is used residentially and is appropriate for residential use as it is the second lot west of Hermosa Avenue, and is not tied to the Hermosa Avenue frontage lot; B. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the Staff Environmental Review Committee and the proposed zone change has been determined to qualify for a Negative Declaration; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby amend general plan map as described as follows, and adopts an environmental negative declaration: General Plan Amend from General Commercial (GC) to Medium Density Residential (MD) the parcel at 64 10th Street, and legally described as the northerly 57 feet of lot 16, Block 10, Hermosa Beach Tract PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1992, by following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: p/pers64 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY BACKcR a!/ND MATER/A[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 91-82 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUEST FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND A ZONE CHANGE FROM C-2, RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL, TO R-2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FOR THE PARCEL AT 64 10TH STREET LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE NORTHERLY 57 FEET OF LOT 16, BLOCK 10, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed General Plan amendment and zone change on December 3, 1991, and made the following Findings: A. The subject parcel's commercial designations are appropriate to provide the adequate depth for commercial development with frontage on Hermosa Avenue, and it has not been satisfactorily demonstrated that it is in the best interest of the City to change the commercial designations; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby deny the requested General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Di Monda,Marks,Merl,Suard,Chmn.Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 91-82 and complete record of the action taken by the Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California regular meeting of December 3, 1991. 7 Christine Ketz, Chairman Michael Schubach, 01-L_ Date p/persd64 is a true Planning at their I Secretary November 26, 1991 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission December 3, 1991 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-3 ZONE CHANGE 91-2 LOCATION: 64 10TH STREET APPLICANT: KEVIN C. HEALY 64 10TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER A GENERAL PLAN REDESIGNATION FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND A ZONE CHANGE FROM C-2 TO R-2 Recommendation Staff recommends that this item be continued to January 21, 1992, and °renoticed to initiate expanding the area of consideration to include the other half of lot 16 to the south of the subject parcel and also the lot to the east, by adoption the attached resolution of intent. Alternatives A. Deny the request and thereby maintain the commercial designations B. Recommend approval of the request as submitted (this would create an undesirable situation of a "half -lot" with different designations than the other half) C. Consider the subject parcel in conjunction with the land use element revision Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of November 7, 1991, voted to consider the requested general plan amendment in addition to the privately initiated zone change. At their meeting of November 7, 1991, the Staff Environmental Review Committee recommended an environmental negative declaration, and noted that the other half of lot 16 should be considered in conjunction with this request. Analysis The subject lot is the second lot west of Hermosa Avenue on the south side of Tenth Street. It is located a depth of 42.4 feet 12 from Hermosa Avenue. The lot is a "half lot" with a depth of 57 feet from 10th Street. The subject parcel is currently developed with a single family residence (built in 1920) as is the other half of the lot. The adjacent lot with frontage on Hermosa Avenue is also currently developed with a single family dwelling. Along the Hermosa Avenue frontage to the north, south and east of the subject lot, the properties are developed commercially. (See the attached existing land use map). The depth of the commercial uses are 86 feet on the south and 53 feet on the north. Staff reviewed our historic zoning maps (1922, 1930, 1943, 1956, 1978) and in all cases the zoning was commercial for the subject lot. In all cases, except for 1943, the subject lot represented the westerly extent of commercial zoning from Hermosa Avenue. In 1943, the entire south side of 10th Street was designated C-3. On the General Plan in 1965, this lot, along with the whole block was designated "Motels, Commercial, Recreation," and in 1979 its current General Commercial designation was established. The applicant's request is based on a desire to have the residential use of the property recognized, and to remove the nonconforming use status. He has attempted to get the property owner of the other half of lot 16 to join him in this request, but was unable to do so. In staff's judgement the only logical way to view this request would be in conjunction with the other half of the lot. The basic issue involved is whether the City should maintain the commercial designation to a depth of 72 feet in the hope that this added potential depth will encourage a quality commercial project, consistent with the character of Hermosa Avenue. On the other hand, since this property is owned separately from the Hermosa Avenue frontage lot, it would be undesirable to have a commercial use with frontage only on Tenth Street. In that sense the most viable commercial use of the property hinges on assembling this lot with the Hermosa Avenue frontage lot (lot 17). In short, does this lot belong in the Hermosa Avenue commercial corridor, or in the residential neighborhood? A further question is whether or not lot 17 would retain any commercial viability without the potential of assembling with lot 16, as its depth from Hermosa Avenue is only 42.4 feet and the total area is only 4,028 square feet. Staff does not believe with current development standards that the lot would be adequate. Further, its questionable that even with lots 16 and 17 combined that the size could support a desirable commercial project. These concerns, plus this location at the fringe of downtown, warrants the consideration of changing both lots 16 and 17 to residential designations. Since the other half of lot 16 was not included in the noticing, staff is recommending that this item be continued and renoticed, also for the purpose of including lot 17. This will allow' consideration of all the. possibilities prior to making a recommendation to the City Council. Please be reminded that the Commission can only make recommendations on general plan amendments or zone changes, as the final decision is by the City Council. However, a Commission denial is final, unless appealed. Also, .this area will be considered in conjunction with the land use element revision. CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director /•f' Ken -Robertson Associate Planner Attachments 1. Resolution of Intent to expand the area of consideration 2. Maps 3. Alternative Resolutions 4. Staff Review Minutes 11/7/91 5. Public Notice Affidavit -/6 - church's and the restaurant's needs, Ms. Mendez responded the� restaurant would close early on, those two days. Comm. Sua,.fd requested the provision to revoke be removed from the letter. /FIs. Mendez said the applicant would ask the minister to remove✓ that clause. Gare Wayland, C.P.A., 1097 Aviation Boulevard, said Mr./Mendez had asked to use the parking facilities at this address/ but it is unavailable for the restaurant's use. Mr. Wayland expressed his concern that this parking lot would be used without authority by the restaurant's.., patrons. Comm. Marks and Mr. Wayland discussed parking in the nine -foot area next to the building, which was determined to be inappropriate. j Public Hearing closed by Chmn. Ketz at 9:24/D.m. / Comm. Suard noted a mayor point was if/,the Commission wished to encourage area updating and\objected to/the revokable conditions of the letter, noting a more permanent/solution was required. Churn. Ketz felt pedestrians would n'&. come to the restaurant. Comm. Di Monda stated :e was disappoint'd,/the project was started without permits, but pointed out seating\capacity was not being added, therefore, no additional traffic would be added. He felt this restaurant served local, small businesses for the lunch trade. Comm. Di Monda felt the addition could be approved, but with the requirement that the store front be reha>ilitated. Comm. Di Monda and Mr. Schubach discussed the Commissi 's ability to impose a requirement to rehabilitate the store front; \ to which the applicant agreed. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Merl, to approve the Resolution contingent upon the Commission's receiving a nonrevokable parking approval from the church and inspection, acceptance and approval of the existing construction by the Building Department, and submission of store -front \and signage drawings for the Commission's approval. AYES: Cc muus . Di I.ionda, Merl, Chmn. Ketz NOES: i Cc mrs . Mark, Suard ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None FOURTH QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT: GP 91-3/ZO:tiE 91-2 -- GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENT:;L (MD) AND ACNE CHANGE FROI4 C-2 TO r-2, OR TO SUCH OTHER DESIC ATION/ZC":3 LS DEE.LED APPROPRIATE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND 1DOPTION CF 2-1Im ENVIRC..ukENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 64 10T3 STREET. Recommended Action: To continue to January 27, 1992 meeting to include the adjacent areas. Mr. Schubach stated Staff recommends continuance, with renotifi- cation to an expanded area to include lot 17, noting a Resolution of Intent has been submitted. He gave the item actions completed thus far and describe& the subject parcel and the types of construction development, as well as zoning of surrounding �- P.C.Minutes 12/3/91 properties. Mr. Schubach noted historically this lot has been zoned "commercial", but the applicant is requesting a zoning of "residential". He noted Staff's conclusion that combination of this and the adjoining one-half lot would not result in a lot size which could support a desirable commercial project which warrants consideration in changing both lots 16 and 17 to residential designations. He reminded the Commission that it can only make recommendations on General Plan Amendments or Zone Changes, however, a Commission denial is final, unless appealed. Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Ketz at 9:40 n.m. No one wished to speak to the Commission relation to this item. Public Hearing closed by Chmn. Ketz at 9:40 p.m. Comm. Di Monda discussed the constant problems associated with the residential and commercial zones being adjacent and the resultant parking problems. He questioned approving residential zoning in the center of commercial zones, commenting he felt the commercial strip shoul'.'1 be enlarged and viewed this item as counterproductive. Comm. Merl expressed his agreement with Comm. Di Monda's statements. Chinn. Ketz ascertained from Mr. Schubach the applicant wished the change in order to allow him to conduct residential property development to his single-family home on the property. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Merl, to deny GP 91-3/Zone 91-2, maintaining the commercial zoning designation. AYES: Ccarms . Di _-yon da, Marks, Merl, Suard, ' Chmr_ . Xetz NOES: None A. STAIN: None AZSE1VT: Nolie HEARING XR 91-6' -- AN EXCEPTION FhC•_ SECTION 12-7(B) TO ALLOW,A FIRST - 'TORY REMODEL AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE- FAMILY DWELLING WITH A NONCONFORMING SIDEYARD AT 1040 -10TH STREET. Recommended Action: To approve the request. Mr. Schubach described the property location and building con- struction particulars, stating the second story addition is in compliance. He stated a two -car - garage is not necessarily required, the remodel is calculated to be 95.1% of replacement value of the existing nonccnforming structure. Mr. Schubach noted the sideyard nonconformity isnot severe,. the existing structure is in sound condition, the -'projected dwelling size compares with neighboring houses, more than adequate open'space is provided and the proposed plans-* will result in an overall improvement in dwelling appearance. Public Hearing o paned by Chmn. Ketz at 9:49 p.m. Ken Sarno, 1040 10th Street, a 13 -year resident, introduced his architect and contractor to the Commission. ' It was stated air conditioning and heating units would be placed on the roof. 13 P.C.Minutes 12/3/91 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RE: NOTIFICATION LIST FOR: • 64 10TH STREET (4187-003-017) I hereby certify to the best of my knowledge the attached Ownership List contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County of Los Angeles within the project site and for a distance of three hundred (300') feet from the project site of property, legally described as shown above, and that said list also contains the resident addresses within the same above referenced area. It is hereby stipulated that the City of Hermosa Beach is not responsible for any portion of this list. I, the undersigned, do declare under penalty of perjury that I did on the 9th day of January, 1992. deposit in the United States Post Office, first class postage prepaid, a copy of the public notice attached as Exhibit "A" to each and every person attached as Exhibit "B". I warrant that the persons named on Exihibit "B" are all the persons required by applicable law to receive the public notice attached as Exhibit "A". I understand and agree that it is my responsibility to cause these public notices to be made in an accurate and timely fashion and agree to hold the City harmless against any liability whatsoever for the preparation of notification radius and determination of occupancy recipients. In the event an action is instituted in a court of competent juristiction which questions the legality of the public notices, then the City may in its exclusive discretion suspend all hearings or cause the cessation of any construction or of any use which was permitted as a result of a hearing which was held in accordance with the public notice. In the event that the court declares the notice or noticing procedure to be defective, then the City may in its exclusive discretion revoke any permits granted and cause any approvals given pursuant to those public notices to be declared null and void and I agree on behalf of myself and my heirs, assigns or successors -in -interest to hold the City harmless in connection therewith. I declare under penalty or perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. CATHY SCHULTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS On January 9. 1992, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Cathy Schulte, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that she executed the same. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL. OFFICIAL SEAL LAURICE M. DUKE Notary Public • Cntltnrnia PRINCIPAL OFFICE MI L. A. COUNTY My Comm. Exp. Mar. 12, 1993 ;37 /9�` ,2 /az - /o/ 6-/t 4t/LZ_ F JL7,1 o.tAi ctAL (//(i / Jo-c_etJ2-al / X-A,TA rye Ci�.�c. )'6a74- ��e.cc� 7.7-4 /72 442- 6(' 1(/) J �v a // �/c a.�. e-r�. • fit- �4� 6-v SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION STEPHEN P. SHOEMAKER, JR. 123 INTERNATIONAL BOARDWALK • REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90277 • (213) 379-8510 January 24, 1992 Kevin Healy 64 10th Street Hermosa Beach, California 90254 RE: PROPERTY LOCATED AT 70 10TH STREET & 10TH COURT I, Stephen P. Shoemaker Jr., am the owner of the above properties and I am aware that Kevin Healy is in the process of re -zoning his property located at 64 10th Street. I am not opposed to the re -zone. In fact I feel that the property along the West side of Hermosa Avenue would be better suited to the community if it were zoned R2. If you have any further questions or if I could be of further assistance please call me at 800-553-3439. Cordially, Stephen P. Shoemaker Jr. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 5 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 91-3 January 16, 1992 Regular Meeting of January 28, 1992 9.7-/46-5- 01.2?/9.a-- January .7io6s / /9 - PURPOSE: TO ADD DAY NURSERIES, PRESCHOOLS, AND DAY-CARE CENTERS WITH 13 OR MORE CHILDREN AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE R-1 ZONE INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation To introduce the attached ordinance amending the zoning ordinance text as recommended by the Planning Commission. Background At their meeting of January 7, 1992 the Planning Commission recommended to amend the zoning ordinance text to include day nurseries, preschools, and day-care centers with 13 or more children as a conditionally permitted use in the R-1 zone. In addition the Commission recommended language to establish minimum standards for review of C.U.P. requests for these day care facilities. On November 19, 1991 the Planning Commission considered a request to rezone property at 739 Longfellow from R-1 to C-3 and for a conditional use permit for a day-care facility for 30 children. Rather than recommending a rezoning , however, the Commission directed staff to initiate a text amendment to allow day-care centers as a conditionally permitted use in residential zones. Analysis Please refer to the Planning Commission staff report for the analysis. The only changes made by the Planning Commission to staff's recommendation was to include a parking standard of one space for every 7 children, and to add language that any such facilities must be licensed by the State. Mi6hael Schubach Planning Director rl Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Re pectful y submitted, Ken Robertson Associate Planner Attachments 1. Proposed ordinance 2. P.C. resolution, staff report, minutes 1/7/92 p/pcsrkid — I_ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE 92 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO ALLOW DAY NURSERIES, PRESCHOOLS, AND AFTER SCHOOL CHILD CARE FACILITIES WITH THIRTEEN (13) OR MORE CHILDREN AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE R-1 ZONE, AND AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 10, OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOR GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR SUCH FACILITIES AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on January 21, 1992, to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission to amend the zoning ordinance and made the following Findings: A. Opportunities for opening child day care or preschool facilities of thirteen (13) or more children are limited only to the commercial zones; B. In certain circumstances, there may be appropriate locations in residential zones for allowing such uses; C. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the General Plan; D. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the Staff Environmental Review Committee and it was determined that this text amendment qualifies for a negative declaration; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the zoning ordinance text be amended to allow day nurseries, preschools, and after school child care for thirteen (13) or more children as a permitteduse in the R-1 zone, as follows: SECTION 1. Amend Section 4-2. Permitted Uses, by adding the following subsection (10): "(10) Day Nursery, Preschool, and/or after school child care with thirteen (13) or more 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 children, conditional use permit required subject to Section 10-9.1 SECTION 2. Add the following section: "Section 10-9.1 Day Nursery, Preschools, and After School Child Care with thirteen (13) or more children The following minimum conditions and standards, in addition to any other deemed necessary or appropriate to ensure compatibility with existing or future permitted uses in the vicinity, shall be required: (1) A minimum of one parking space for every seven (7) children (2) In residential zones, only property adjacent to commercially zoned property or property developed with a church or school facility shall be considered for a day nursery, preschool, -or child care facility with thirteen (13) or more children (3) Adequate space for loading and unloading children shall be available or shall be provided on the site (4) Residential use of a day nursery, preschool, or child care facility with thirteen (13) or more children shall be prohibited (5) All day care centers shall comply with state statutes and shall be licensed by the state. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date Of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. - 3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1992 by following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY APPROVE DIAS 2 0 /FORM: p/perskid y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 92-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW DAY NURSERIES, PRESCHOOLS, AND AFTER SCHOOL CHILD CARE FACILITIES WITH THIRTEEN (13) OR MORE CHILDREN AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE R-1 ZONE, AND AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 10 TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOR GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR SUCH FACILITIES AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 7, 1992, and made the following Findings: A. Opportunities for opening child day care or preschool facilities of thirteen (13) or more children are limited only to the commercial zones; B. In certain circumstances, there may be appropriate locations in residential zones for allowing such uses; C. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the General Plan; D. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the Staff Environmental Review Committee and it was determined that this text amendment qualifies for a negative declaration; NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby recommend that the zoning ordinance text be amended to allow day nurseries, preschools, and after school child card for thirteen (13) or more children as a permitted use in the R-1 zone, as follows: SECTION 1. Amend Section 4-2. Permitted Uses, by adding the following subsection (10): "(10) Day Nursery, Preschool, and/or after school child care with thirteen (13) or more children, conditional use permit required subject to Section 10-9.1 SECTION 2. Add the following section: "Section 10-9.1 Day Nursery, Preschools, and After School Child Care with thirteen (13) or more children 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The following minimum conditions and standards, in addition to any other deemed necessary or appropriate to ensure compatibility with existing or future permitted uses in the vicinity, shall be required: (1) A minimum of one parking space for every seven (7) children (2) In residential zones, only property adjacent "to commercially zoned property or property developed with a church or school facility shall be considered for a day nursery, preschool, or child care facility with thirteen (13) or more children (3) Adequate' space for loading and unloading children shall be available or shall be provided on the site (4) Residential use of a day nursery, preschool, or child care facility with thirteen (13) or more children shall be prohibited (5) All day care centers shall meet State statutes] and be licensed by the state. VOTE: AYES: Comms. DiMonda, Merl, Suard, Chmn.Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: Comms. Marks ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 92-1 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular, meeting of January 7, 1992. j' i/ Christine Ketz, 'Chairman Michael"Schubach, Secretary Date p/perskid 6 December 24, 1991 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission January 7, 1991 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 91-3 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD DAY NURSERIES, PRESCHOOLS, AND DAY-CARE CENTERS WITH THIRTEEN OR MORE CHILDREN AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE R-1 ZONE INITIATED BY PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation To adopt the attached resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed text amendment. Background At their meeting of November 19, 1991 the Planning Commission considered a request to rezone property at 739 Longfellow from R-1 to C-3 and for a conditional use permit for a day-care facility for 30 children. Rather than rezoning the property to a commercial designation, however, the Commission directed staff to initiate a text amendment to allow day-care centers as a conditionally permitted use in residential zones. Analysis Section 4-2(4) of the zoning ordinance includes "Large day care homes" as a permitted use by conditional use permit in the R-1 zone. However, the size is limited to a maximum of 12 children by section 10-9. "Day nursery, preschool, and/or after school child care with thirteen (13) or more children" are permitted only in the C-1, C-2 and C-3 zones, with a conditional use permit (Section 8-2). Given these existing standards, the potential for opening larger day care facilities, or preschools is somewhat limited. Expanding the potential locations to include residential areas would allow for more possibilities for child care centers. This would not be inconsistent with the current ordinance which includes elementary schools and churches as permitted uses, subject to a conditional use permit. The concerns with allowing day care facilities or preschools with more than 13 children in a residential area are related to the potential traffic and noise intrusion. The children would be very young (typically 2 to 5 years old) and thus require parents to drop them off, usually in their cars, and also a large percentage of the time spent at the facility is outdoors in a play area. In this way, the impacts from a day care center or preschool are potentially more noticeable than the impacts from an elementary school. Staff, therefore, believes that not only should these larger facilities be subject to the requirement for a conditional use permit, but should also only be allowed in limited circumstances. As such, in addition to adding day nurseries and preschools as permitted use in the R-1 zone (and therefore in the R-2 and R-3 zones) staff is recommending the creation of an additional section in Article 10 that would limit the granting of C.U.P's for day care facilities and preschools to locations either adjacent to commercial zones or in conjunction with existing schools and churches. Further recommended conditions include that a minimum of 6 parking spaces be provided and that a satisfactory location be provided or available for loading and unloading of children. The amount of parking that should be required for these facilities is still open to question. Currently, Section 1156 would apply since day care facilities are not specifically listed in the parking ordinance, which means that the determination of the needed parking rests with the Planning Commission. Another option would be to establish specific requirements based on the number of children and/or the number of employees. For example, the City of Manhattan Beach requires 1 parking space for each 7 children, and the City of Torrance requires 1 parking space for each teacher/employee and one space for each 15 children. Given that a C.U.P. would be required for this type of use, however, staff is comfortable with the flexibility offered by a case by case determination of appropriate parking requirements. CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director Respectfully submitted, 4 en Robertson Associate Planner Attachments 1. Proposed resolution 2. Staff Review Minutes 3. Comments from Building Department 4. List of existing licensed social service facilites in Hermosa Beach p/pcsrkid To THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OF H ;RMOSA BEACH AN r, 1992 I oppose the amendment (91-3) to a city ordinance to permit the operation of day care centers with lal:ge„enro.t:t01exlts in residential areas. I also oppose a proposed zone change from R -i to C•-3 and a Conditional use permit to allow a day care center, and the adoption of a mitigated negative declaration at 7:39 Longfellow Avenue for the following reasons: 1. Longfellow Avenue is a residential street with; single family homes on R-1 lots. A zone change from R-1 to C-3 at this address would constitute an unacceptable precedent and would promote more zone changes from residential to commercial.. Additionally a zone change would result in a decrease in residential/property values and ;Increase the difficulty in selling existing properties in an already depressed market, these homes represent; a significant investment on the part of property owners and action taken to diminish these investments would be irresponsible on the part of the Planning Department. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION a TO 39Vd Because of the nature of this business and the subsequent increase in traffic there would be an unacceptable increase in the noise level, adversely impacting on nearby neighbors, 3. There is the concern about the problem with parking along Longfellow Avenue and Boundary Place if this proposal is enacted. Longfellow Avenue has extremely limited parking available for the residents now, if this proposal were passed there simply wouldn't be space available to allow additional parking on the magnitude that would be required. A car unable to find legal parking might decide to double park adversely affecting normal traffic flow and decreasing traffic safety. This problem is further compounded on Boundary Place due to the extreme narrowness of this street. If this proposal is enacted there would be an unacceptable increase in traffic at peak times of the day when parents would b; dropping off and picking up their children, this would nnfairly affect the residents of Longfellow Avenue. 5. There would be a decrease in traffic safety because of the points raised in 3 and 4. Sepulveda Boulevard is a malar throughfare which nas a heavy amount of traffic during normal periods, at commute hours that traffic increases dramatically. The Location of the day c:are center (739 Longfellow Avenue) begins at a point approximately 25_yards from the west side of the intersection of Lorngfellow and Sepulveda. More than three or four cars at any given time stopping to pick up or leave off passengers would negatively impact traffic flow on Sepulveda with a dramatic increase in the risk of traffic accidents. It is not unlikely that occupants of some of the cars being subjected to this traffic hazard would be children. Additionally, the problem of congestion is compounded because there is a business parking garage, that has its only access on Longfellow, located on the same side of the street between the day care center and Sepulveda Boulevard. 6. If the Hermosa Beach Planning Comm.i,ssion approves this conditional use permit it does so with the foreknowledge of the increase in traffic congestion and hazards with an associated risk to persons and property. —f— 7 If a day care center is necessary and needed within the community then an effort should be made to find a location that is properly zoned (one that doesn't require rezoning to conform): a location that would not negatively impact the neighboring area in so many ways as this one, a Location where the neighbors would welcome instead of rejecting it. It would seem that the motives and purposes promoting the day care center are only for profit and other selfserving reasons. In conclusion, the Planning Commission has an overriding responsibility to the residents on Longfellow Avenue to deny this proposal for the reasons stated. Sincerely, Robert G. 0 Homeowner 734 Longfellow Avenue Hermosa Beach January Ob, 1992 /0 E �E d Wilma Bert, 1152 7th Street, likes the idea of a hotel but i opposed to the changes proposed, noted the "grandfather" clause not applicable, and objected to additional area traffic and imp.ct on residents. Robert, Schubert, 553 21st Street, objected to another hotel n the area, discussing the current economical impact on existing ►otels. Hue Lai, 3100 Marywood Drive, Traffic Engineer, stated t e rate of increased traffic due to the hotel would be low and mpared the rate to commuter and commercial traffic and the hours of impact. After discussion with Chmn. Ketz and Comm. Marks, M - . Lai offered to review the on-site traffic flow and closing of F.tst Place. Howard Chen, owner/developer's representative, s ated the project will be over $5,00'Q,,000, discussed the investme potential, resell value and previous\plan reviews, resulting i the proposed plan being presented. He\stated the swimming poo was a minor problem and could be removed f'7m the plans. John McQue, 718 First Place, owner of three properties on First Place, stated he experiences parking, traffic and turning problems on First Place and First $treet. He felt closure of First Place would be a good option and "the existing 20' wall should remain to afford blockage from commercial. Public Hearing continued andbought back to the Commission by Chmn. Ketz at 8:25 p.m. Chmn. Ketz noted Staff's recommendation to continue. Comm. Di Monda discussed the definitions of `""hotel" and "motel" with Mr. Schubach, with Mr. Schubach stating \the plans meet the "hotel" requirements. Comm. Di Monda felt it \should be classified as a "motel" since no hotel services were offered. He suggested the Commission review the definitions, consider making First Place a cul de sac after surveying the residents, and asked the City Attorney to provide an opinion on the previously mentioned grandfather clause the next time this issue isdiscussed. The Commission DIRECTED Staff to \ contact residents through a questionnaire obtaining their opinions as to First\Place closure at one end. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Marks, to\CONTINUE PDP 91-5 to February 18, 1992, with presentation to the \ Commission of full-size plans, a materials board, the City Attorney's opinion regarding the grandfather clause being presented on that date. AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl, Suard, Chmn. Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None TEXT 91-3 -- TEXT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW DAY CARE FACILITIES FOR MORE THAN 12 CHILDREN AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN ALL RESIDEN- TIAL ZONES AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. — 14 — P.C.Minutes 1/7/92 Recommended Action: To recommend approval of the text amendment and adoption of the Environmental Negative Declaration. Mr. Schubach discussed the history of this Text Amendment, noting day care centers with more than 12 children are permitted only in the C-1, -2, and -3 zones with a C.U.P. He stated expanding day care centers into the residential areas would allow more day care centers, expressed concern relating to traffic and noise, noted additional recommended conditions and suggested additional parking requirements, and recommended approval of the Text Amendment due to the flexibility offered for case-by-case review and determination. Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Ketz at 8:40 p.m. Mr. Woods, 731 Longfellow, felt this process was conducted to allow one child care center to open in his neighborhood, stating there are currently adequate child care centers available. Wilma Bert, 152 7th Street, did not agree with the ability to open child care centers any place within Hermosa Beach, no fencing is required, nor is an age limit of six years old mentioned or licensing required. She was against approval of the Text Amend- ment. Tom Goodwin, 736 Longfellow, opposed the recommended action. He explained the parking problems experienced by his neighbors and himself. Jeff Barnell, 722 Longfellow, questioned the number of required parking spaces, noting the parking problems being experienced by residents. Bill Beck, applicant, supported the Text Amendment. Public Hearing closed by Chmn. Ketz at 8:49 p.m. Commissioner Suard confirmed a C.U.P. would be required if the Text Amendment were approved. Chmn. Ketz discussed with Mr. Schubach the State standards for open space at day care center, as well as additional parking requirements tied to the number of teachers or children rather than defining a specified number. Comm. Suard felt additional requirements in terms of buffers were needed. Mr. Lee noted under State Statute, requirements are imposed and admin- strated by the County prior to license issuance and retention. Comm. Di Monda commented the issues are whether to allow extended day care use within the City with a C.U.P. and the adjacent -to - commercial lots requirements. MOTION by Chmm. Ketz, seconded by Comm. Merl, to ADOPT TEXT 91-3 with a change of Section 2, Number 1, to read, "A Minimum of one parking space for every seven children" and the addition of Section 2, Number 5 to read, "All day care centers shall meet State statutes and be licensed". AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Merl, Suard, Chmn. Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: Comm. Marks ABSENT: None -/2- P.C.Minutes 1/7/92 Mr. Schubach noted the City Council Public Hearing of this item will be held in approximately one month, with a notice of hearing being published in the local newspaper(s). A recess was taken from 9:02 to 9:08 p.m. HEARINGS CON 90-8 -- A REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF A CONDITIONAL/ USE PERMIT AND VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #22100 FOR A TWO -UNIT/ CONDOMINIUM AT 626 7TH STREET. Recommended Action: To grant one year extension. Mr. Schubach\stated the applicant is requesting an extsion due to the present state of the economy. Staff recommends this extension in order to give the applicant time to record the,4inal map. He noted a similar\request was previously granted .nly a six-month extension. Comm. Suard determined with Mr. Schubach that the application is within compliance wit the current code. Public Hearing opened b Chmn. Ketz at 9:10 .. No one wished to speak regarding this it Public Hearing closed by Chmn\Ketz at :10 p.m. Comm. Di Monda felt the perio\ of one-year should be reduce to six -months as was granted to the er applicant. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, secdnded by Comm. Marks, to MOVE to extend CUP for a six month period, t� June 19, 1992. AYES: Comms. Di Mond/Marks,� Merl, Suard, Chmn. Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None NR 91-7 -- AN EXCEPTION FROM SECTION 13-7(b)'TO ALLOW AN ADDITION AND REMODEL RESULTING IN GREATER THAN 50% EXPANSION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AT/1542 GOLDEN AVENUE. Mr. Schubach described the proposed remodel, property location and current buildings. He outlined the significant improvements proposed by the applicant and explained the deficiencies of the side yard and garage setback, stating exceptions are ne&ssary. Mr. Schubach stated it appeared, from the site visit, \impact is minimal. /The Commission must make a Finding that the goals\, intent and purposes of Article 13 are being met if it approv s this request:: Staff believes this finding can be made, allowing sound structure to be maintained and expanded with the current no con- formities not significant or unusual for the neighborhood. Comm. Marks asked that a longitudinal study be included for revie noting first floor columns separated by a pool. Comm. Di Monda —'3— P.C.Minutes 1/7/92 ^� `..� .. �`. ^/ - I.' _ -, _ ' -_ � - .-. ` -_ . �~, January 22, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council January 28, 1992 SUBJECT: PARKING PLAN 90-7 - APPEAL (postponed one year at the request of the appellant from 3/12/91) LOCATION: 415 PIER AVENUE APPELLANT: LAWRENCE M. DAVID, M.D. 415 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: TO POSTPONE AN ADDITIONAL 6 MONTHS THE CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF THE PARKING PLAN Recommendation Staff recommends that this request be postponed an additional six ,(6) months as requested by the applicant. Alternative Officially sustain the Planning Commission's decision to deny the request. The applicant will then have the option to reapply for the necessary approvals if and when a second parking district is established. Background •The Planning Commission, at their meeting of January 2, 1991, denied the request by Dr. David for a parking plan to allow a second story addition to an existing office building without providing any additional parking. The applicant immediately filed an appeal of this decision to the City Council. The City Council, at their meeting of March 12, 1991, however, postponed action on the appeal, which was scheduled for public hear for the next meeting in March, and referred the request to the Vehicle Parking District (VPD). This action was taken in response to a written request from the applicant for referral of the request to the VPD to consider including Dr. David's office location in the VPD or perhaps the creation of a second VPD. On January 21, 1992, staff received a request to extend the postponement for an additional six months (see attached correspondence). 1 8 Analysis Currently, the Vehicle Parking District's Board of Parking Place Commissioners are sending letters to businesses in the upper Pier Avenue area to determine if there is a desire to form a second or third VPD. If responses are positive the Board will proceed with the procedures for consideration of additional VPD's. It would appear to be premature to take action on the proposed parking plan until more is known about the VPD prospects. It should be noted that prior to any action to accept or modify the parking plan, this appeal must be properly noticed, since it was not originally noticed to property owners within a 300 -foot radius and since it was postponed to an unspecified date. As such, the applicant must still submit additional fees to pay for proper noticing. CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Ditector Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Ressectf4 Submitted: en Robertson Associate Planner Attachments 1. Letter requesting 6 -month extension 1/21/92 2. C.C. Minutes 3/12/91 3. Letter from Triad Design 2/5/91 4. P.C. Resolution, Staff Report, Minutes 1/2/91 2 TRIAD DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. 200 Pier Avenue, Suite 38 Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (213) 376-8849 Accident Analysis ALTA Surveys Assessment Engineering Building Appeals Building Design Building Inspections CCS'R's Coastal Permits Conditional Use Permits Condominium Budgets Condominium Plans D.R.E. Processing Electric Service Plans Energy Calculations Erosion Plans Expert Witness Feasibility Studies Fire Damage Appraisal Forensic Engineering Foundation Inspections Gas Plans Grading Plans Hydrology Studies Land Planning Landscaping Plan Legal Descriptions Legal Determinations Management Documents Mapping Noticing Parcel Maps Pinks crr' Whites Presentations Radius Maps Reserve Account Analysis Seismic Rehabilitation Sewer Plan Shoring Design Solar Reports Special Use Permits Storm DrainPlans Street Lighting Plans Street Plans Street Tree Plans Structural Appraisals Structural Design Structural Drafting Supervision Surveys Tract Maps Utilities Plans Utility Easements Variances Water Plans Working Drawings Zone Changes 1113 January 21, 1992 Hermosa Beach Planning Dept. Re: Job No. 88-1915 Dr. David 415 Pier Avenue ;NI 9 1 igg2 We requested the' extension of the variance application to allow time for the V.P.D. to respond to our request to allow us into the District. They have considered the request and have sent out a request to the local businesses to see if all are interested. We therefore request an extension of 6 months while this information is processed and acted upon. Triad Design Associates, Inc. for Dr -.-Da d Wo6d -3- (j) Action: To approve the staff recommendations to: 1) authorize the City Manager to sign the agree- ment with the Office of Traffic Safety; and, 2) authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary. Recommendation to approve request for 30 -day extension of temporary appointment of Deputy City Clerk. Memoran- dum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 19, 1991. A no vote was recorded on this item by Councilmember Midstokke. Action: To approve the staff recommendation. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION - None Item 4 was suspended at 8:08 P.M. until after items 6, 7 and 5. Items 5 and 6 were public hearings. Item 6 was heard first and was taken with item '7 which related to item 6. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Triad Design Associates, Inc. dated February 5, 1991, re. parking for 2nd story office addition at 415 Pier Avenue, with a staff recommendation. Coming forward to address the Council on this matter was: Jack Wood - 200 Pier Avenue, #8, responded to Council questions. Action: To refer the request to the Vehicle Parking District and allow postponement of the appeal for a maximum of one year. Motion Mayor Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. (b) Letter from June Williams, dated February 6, 1991 re. consideration of an ordinance requiring speakers to dis- close if they are being paid to support a particular view or have a financial interest, with response letter from City Manager dated February 19, 1991. Proposed Action: To consider an Ordinance. Motion Wiemans. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Proposed Action: To direct the City attorney to research if any other General Law Cities have adopted this type of Ordinance. Motion Creighton, second Wiemans. The motion failed due to the objections of Essertier, Midstokke and Mayor Sheldon. City Council Minutes 03-12-91 Page 7410 TRIAD DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. 200 Pier Avenue, Suite 38 Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (213) 376-8849 February 5, 1991 City Council City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: Our Job 89-29115 415 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RECEIVED FEB 061991 CITY MGR. OFFICE Since the appeal from the Planning Commission determination for,a parking plan, we have contacted the Vehicle Parking District Board and examined the Streets and Highways code. Based on this research and a discussion, we have determined that it is possible to solve our problem by dealing with the Vehicle Parking District and being accepted into it. Therefore, we make the following proposal. 1) ,.That we postpone the hearing scheduled on the Planning Commission action until after this ancillary action and; 2) That the city council consider this letter as a written request to have the property located at 415 Pier Avenue accepted into the Vehicle Parking District. The Streets and Highways code indicate that owners of lots may petition to join the Vehicle Parking District by petitioning the governing body. The council would either act or delegate to the VPD for initial shop and recommendation. The Vehicle Parking District would report back a recommendation for action at the council level. We request that you postpone the appeal of the Planning Commission action and combine the hearings in the future. Thank you for hearing opportunity to plead District. T r j`ad n e s i gn 111 us out. We would appreciate this our case to the Vehicle Parking STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Allow the postpone- ment not to exceed one year from January 31, 1991 and refer the request to join the Vehicle Parking District to the Board of Parking Place Commissioners. 4a RESOLUTION P.C. 91-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING WITHOUT PROVIDING ADDITIONAL OFF-STREET PARKING AT 415 PIER AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 23 OF HISS' ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH TRACT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 2, 1991 to receive oral and written testimony regarding an application for a Parking Plan at 415 Pier Avenue and made the following findings: A. The applicant is proposing to construct a second story addition to an existing one-story office building without proposing any additional off-street parking and the building is currently nonconforming to parking requirements; B. The proposed addition would increase the square footage of the building by over 70 percent and will likely increase parking demand, and although the applicant has proposed measures to reduce that demand, they would not necessarily be effective nor easily enforceable for the life of the building; C. The proposed programs for ride sharing, the use of public transit, and use of public parking areas are not sufficient to meet the standards of Section 1169 of the zoning ordinance, Parking Plans, because they are not feasible for the small size of the work force; are not enforceable for the life of the building; and would not satisfactorily address the severe parking shortage that would be created; D. The increased parking demand without off-street parking would be potentially detrimental to neighboring properties; 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby deny a parking plan to allow a second story addition without the provision of additional required parking. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Aleks,Marks,Peirce,Rue,Chmn.Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 91-3 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of January 2, 1991. Christine Ketz, Chairperson Michael Schubach, Secretary b , /5•,/ Date a/pers415 7 84c1(CRO(/ND MATER/4l December 26, 1990 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission January 2, 1991 SUBJECT: PARKING PLAN 90-7 LOCATION: 415 PIER AVENUE APPLICANT: LAWRENCE M. DAVID M.D. 415 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: TO ALLOW A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING WITHOUT PROVIDING ANY ADDITIONAL PARKING Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the requested Parking Plan. Background PROJECT INFORMATION: Zoning: C-2 General Plan: General Commercial Lot Size: 3239 sq. ft. Current Use: one-story medical office Floor Area: 1600 sq. ft. Parking Spaces: 4 legal spaces Proposed Addition: 1145 square feet Required Parking Spaces: 1.4 The Planning Commission, at their meeting of September 5, 1989,. denied a similar request for a parking plan and variance to allow the second story addition (minutes attached). On October 10, 1989, the City Council sustained the Planning Commission decision on appeal. The Staff Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of September 20, 1990, recommended denial of the request, and recommended that approval only be considered if an environmental impact report is prepared to address cumulative impacts of any further similar projects. Analysis The applicant is requesting to construct a second story addition to an existing medical office building. Instead of requesting a -g - variance, the applicant has revised the request as a Parking Plan only. The suggestion is that the parking deficiency of 10 spaces (14 required versus 4 available) can be justified by the use of a combination of ride -sharing, public transit, and the leasing of parking for employees at Plaza Hermosa (Please refer to the attached letter, dated August 13, 1990, from Jack Wood for a detailed descriptions of the request). The commercial building is currently nonconforming to parking. Four standard size parking spaces are available off the alley. Under current requirements for the existing structure eight spaces would be required. The applicant indicates that as many as ten (10) cars can actually be parked behind the office if parked in tandem, assuming a parking space size of 8' by 15'. The concerns previously noted by staff and the Planning Commission are still valid. How can the city effectively enforce the ride-sharing/public transit/off-site parking proposal?; what happens when the business changes, how can the city legally stop the use of the second story or enforce the ride -sharing program to the new business?; what about the precedent that would be set, can the downtown area support additional building square footage without parking? and will it have a negative impact on other existing business that depend on an available supply of parking? Further, in staff's judgement this proposal does not fit within the scope of the provisions of Section 1169 pertaining to parking plans. First, the proposal does not address the issue of the impact of additional customer parking; even if this addition is for personal office space and storage only it will free up additional space downstairs and potentially increase the number of customers. Secondly, the feasibility and continued use of the ride -sharing program is questionable for an employee staff this small. Third, the amount of the requested deficiency is rather severe --4 spaces instead of 14 --and as such, the immediate impact on adjacent businesses could be severe. And, finally, the suggestion to use some of the public parking at Plaza Hermosa, is not feasible as that parking was provided for public use as part of the development agreement with the City. Please refer to the attached staff reports of July 5 and August 30, 1989, for further background and discussion,of this request. /// , /111/4"i �. Wen Robertson/ K Ro 'Associate Planner CONCUR: 1 Michael Schubach Planning Director Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Staff Review Minutes 9/20/90 3. Application/letter from Jack Wood 4. Staff Reports/Minutes from 1989 review of same request 5. Public Notice Affidavit Co Rue suggested that written handouts be provided to applicants so that they are informe he requirements. MOTION by Commse, seconded by Comm. Aleks, to approve Resolutio • . 91-1, with the following modifications: that the downstairs bathtub be elim - - • , and the size of the bathroom be reduced to inclu • - y a toilet and sink; and (2 bra only one on -street parking space shall be removed. and the a • cant shall be re ed to pay for any realignment of parking spaces. AYES: Comms. Aleks, Mar.:, sue NOES: Comm. Peirce mn. Ketz ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: No Comm. Ru- oped that as much on -street parking as possible can be retain- : the City. Ch a-tz agreed and suggested that that item be discussed by the Commission. PARK 90-7 — PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW A SECOND -STORY OFFICE ADDITION PROVIDING LESS THAN THE REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 415 PIER AVENUE Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated December 26, 1990, and recommended that the Planning Commission deny the requested parking plan. This project is located in the C-2 zone, with a general plan designation of general commercial. The lot size is 3239 square feet. The current use is as a one-story medical office. The floor area is 1600 square feet. There are four legal parking spaces. The proposed addition is 1145 square feet, which results in a requirement of 14 parking spaces. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of September 5, 1989, denied a similar request for a parking plan and variance to allow the second -story addition. On October 10, 1989, the City Council sustained the Planning Commission decision on appeal. The staff environmental review committee, at their meeting of September 20, 1990. recommended denial of the request and recommended that approval only be considered if an environmental impact report is prepared to address cumulative impacts of any further similar projects. The applicant is requesting to construct a second -story addition to an existing medical office building. Instead of requesting a variance, the applicant has revised the request as a parking plan only. The suggestion is that the parking deficiency of ten spaces (14 required versus 4 available) can be justified by the use of a combination of ride sharing, public transit, and the leasing Gf parking for employees at Plaza Hermosa. The commercial building is currently nonconforming to parking. Four standard -sized parking spaces are available off the alley. Under current requirements for the existing structure, eight spaces would be required. The applicant indicates that as many as ten cars can actually be parked behind the office if parking in tandem, assuming a parking space size of eight feet by fifteen feet. The concerns previously noted by staff and the Planning Commission are still valid: How can the City effectively enforce the ride-sharing/public transit/off-site parking proposal? What happens when the business changes? How can the City legally stop the use of the second story or enforce the ride -sharing program to the new business? What about the precedent that would be set? Can the downtown area support additional building square footage without parking? Will it have a negative impact on other existing businesses that depend on an available supply of parking? —1 o P.C. Minutes 1/2/91 Further, in staffs judgement, this proposal does not fit within the scope of the provisions of Section 1169 pertaining to parking plans for the following reasons: (1) The proposal does not address the issue of the impact of additional customer parking. Even if this addition is for personal office space and storage only, it will free up additional space downstairs and potentially increase the number of customers; (2) The feasibility and continued use of the ride - sharing program is questionable for an employee staff this small; (3) The amount of the requested deficiency is rather severe (four spaces instead of fourteen) and as such, the immediate impact on adjacent businesses could be severe; and (4) the suggestion to use some of the public parking at Plaza Hermosa is not feasible, as that parking was provided for public use as part of the development agreement with the City. Mr. Schubach, in response to a question from Comm. Rue, explained that the legal requirement for a compact parking space is seven and a half feet by fifteen and a half feet. Public Hearing opened at 8:06 P.M. by Chmn. Ketz. Jack Wood, 200 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that he has appeared before the Commission previously on this item; (2) stated that the applicant is a pioneer and wishes to propose an alternative; (3) said that the City is not willing to face the severe parking problem; (4) discussed the basic precepts of parking in the City, stating that the parking is for people visiting the City's business areas. Mr. Wood continued and: (1) said that there are ways to solve the parking problems in the City; (2) said that the way to reduce density is to zone more areas commercial; (3) discussed the configuration of the City's commercial areas; (4) noted that most of the lots in the City are very small; (5) explained that the applicant is a very well-known doctor who has many patients from out of state, who do not even drive to the office; rather, they are picked up and driven to the office. Mr. Wood went on and: (1) stated that the applicant needs additional room for record storage; (2) noted that the applicant has no desire to expand his business, and he is willing to sign a document attesting to that fact; (3) commented that the applicant and several of his employees do not drive to work; (4) stated that the applicant is willing to do anything to have this project approved; (5) said that the automobile rules everyone's lives in this day and age; (6) said that the applicant will help the City solve its parking problem. Mr. Wood went on and: (1) asked that the Planning Commission designate a subcommittee to discuss the options with himself and the applicant; (2) said that the applicant will be in business for another 15 years, and he is sincerely attempting to solve his problem as well as help the City's parking problem; (3) stressed that Hermosa Beach businesses cannot provide parking on-site and be competitive with other local businesses; (4) stressed that parking must be provided without the use of conventional methods; (5) noted that there are parking problems only on the weekends and in the summer. Mr. Wood continued and: (1) suggested that flexible methods be implemented to attack the parking problems; (2) said that if the City wants to improve the parking, parking districts should be provided throughout the commercial areas on lots as they become available; (3) discussed the concept of buying lots for use as parking; (4) again raised the issue of his meeting with a Planning Commission subcommittee to tackle the parking problem. Comm. Marks asked what proposals have been submitted related to the parking for this proposed project. Mr. Wood stated that: (1) the applicant will guarantee that a specified number of his employees will not drive to the site; (2) it is impossible to expect patients to park in the rear of this site; (3) all four of the existing parking spaces will be left for patient use, and the spaces will be P.C. Minutes 1/2/91 patrolled; (4) every step will be taken to ensure that patients will not park on the street; (5) the applicant is very interested in reaching a compromise as to the parking. Mr. Wood went on and: (1) stated that patients could be picked up and shuttled to the business; (2) said people could be required to sign affidavits stating that they will not drive to the office. Comm. Marks noted that the area is already very congested, and the proposed expansion without the required additional parking would exacerbate the problem. Mr. Wood stated that if clients do park in the other business' parking spaces, the other property owner will complain, and tickets could then be issued to violators. Comm. Marks suggested that Mr. Wood contact a parking specialist to address the parking problem for this business, to which Mr. Wood countered that the solution is to provide remote parking for the business. Mr. Wood stated that the applicant can control his employees; therefore, enforcement is somewhat easier. He stated that covenants can be placed on the property to ensure compliance. He stressed that innovative solutions must be implemented in the City. Comm. Marks again urged Mr. Wood to consult a parking consultant to address the problem of having a certain amount of space and only a certain amount of parking space. He felt that a request for a 70 percent expansion without providing additional parking is not appropriate. Mr. Wood stated that many other businesses in town do not have the required parking. He said that in order for businesses to succeed in the City, innovative parking arrangements must be considered. He felt that the answer lies in providing remote parking. Mr. Wood, in response to questions from Comm. Rue, stated that, for whatever reasons, patients will simply not park in the rear. Dr. Johnston, owner of the property next to the proposed project site, addressed the Commission and: (1) explained that, contrary to Mr. Wood's assertion, there is no professional jealousy between him and the applicant, stating that on occasion he has even loaned medical equipment to Dr. David; (2) stated that the proposed second -story addition would have a serious financial impact on his business; (3) said that Dr. David's practice has grown tremendously over the years; (4) explained that his is the only building on the street with a sideyard; (5) stated that for some reason people do not want to travel down the sideyard to park in the rear. Dr. Johnston continued and: (1) noted that Dr. David's property has no sideyard, therefore, people will not drive around to the back and then walk to the front of the building; (2) stressed that there is no jealously here; his main objection relates to the financial impacts to his business; (3) said that many of his patients are elderly and in pain and are not able to park a distance away and walk to the office; (4) noted concern over enforcement of innovative parking arrangements, such as valet service and/or shuttle service to the office; (5) noted concern over the fact that the business could be sold, and the new owner may not want to utilize valet parking; (6) said that he was contemplating selling his business to another doctor, however, the other doctor decided against the purchase due to the lack of parking in the area; (7) stressed that parking is a problem all the time in this area. Parker Herriott, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that even in the evening there is a parking shortage in the area of the proposed project; (2) concurred with staffs recommendation to deny this request; (3) urged the Commission to use the same reasoning that was used when this project was previously denied; (4) stated that there is nothing wrong with trying to improve one's property, however. the required parking should be provided, possibly underground; (5) noted that the proper parking is not available for the proposed project. P.C. Minutes 1/2/91 - !2 - Jim Lissner, 2715 El Oeste, Hermosa Beach. addressed the Commission and: (1) questioned what will happen if this project were approved and the current owner sold the property; (2) stressed that the proper parking must be provided, either through the use of car stackers or through the demolition of the ground floor of the building so that it could be used for parking. Gerry Compton. 200 Pier Avenue. Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) agreed that innovative parking methods must be utilized to mitigate the severe parking problems in the City; (2) stated that it might make sense to try an innovation in this case: (3) stressed the importance of making the commercial areas viable, noting that businesses provide most of the taxes that maintain the infrastructure of the City; (4) discussed various methods by which the parking problems could be addressed; (5) discussed the project at hand, stating that the applicant might reduce the size of the proposed addition, or he might consider the use of triple stackers. Mr. Wood stated that there is a back door at the applicant's office, and people could use that entrance if so desired. He encouraged the Commission to form a subcommittee to meet with him to address the parking problem for this proposed project. He stressed that he is trying to take positive steps in regard to this project. Public Hearing closed at 8:50 P.M. by Chmn. Ketz. Comm. Rue agreed that there are severe parking problems in this City. He addressed Mr. Wood's suggestion that the Commission designate a subcommittee to find a solution for this project's parking problems and stated that the Chamber of Commerce has formed a committee to address parking concerns and the VPD is taking steps also. He stated that he does not have the time to sit on another committee to address this applicant's problems. He did agree, however, that something must be done about the problem. Comm. Rue stated that the purpose of the Commission is not to serve as deal brokers; rather, they are a planning body. He wanted to see parking improvements and stated that he would lend his support; however, he felt it is inappropriate for the applicant to ask the Commissioners to spend additional time on this project. He suggested that the applicant present a concrete proposal which can be addressed by the Commission. Comm. Peirce felt it would not be appropriate to allow businesses to expand without providing parking. He stated that most "innovative" solutions are only short-term remedies. He felt that long-term parking solutions must be accomplished by the City. He stated that maintaining a parking plan over a number of years is not feasible. Comm. Aleks stated that it is not appropriate to allow this business to expand without providing additional parking, noting that there is already a severe parking problem in this area. He felt that a parking plan would be difficult to enforce. Therefore, he could not support approval of this project. Chmn. Ketz felt that long-term specific solutions are necessary for this area, and she did not feel that the proposed parking plan would be a long-term solution. MOTION by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Rue, to approve staffs recommendation, Resolution P.C. 91-3, denying the parking plan request at 415 Pier Avenue. AYES: Comms. Aleks, Marks, Peirce, Rue, Chmn. Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by Comm. Peirce, to direct staff to send a letter to the VPD and Chamber of Commerce requesting that parking updates be sent to the Commission. The letter should also indicate the Commission's concerns and interest in this matter, and the fact - 13-- P.C. Minutes 1/2/91 that the Commission lends its support to the program. The Commissions' interest relates specifically to the downtown area. Pacific Coast Highway, Pier Avenue, and Hermosa Avenue. No objections: so ordered. Recess taken from 8:59 P.M. until 9:08 P.M. \CUP 90-24 — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ADULT VIDEOS AND FOR OFF -SALE GENERA, ALCOHOL AT AN EXISTING ESTABLISHMENT ALREADY LICENSED BY THE A.B.C. ;4 ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 400 PIER A COAST LIQUOR Mr. Schist ach gave staff report dated December 26, 1990. and recommended app • •val of the requested\onditional use permit, subject to the conditions specified in e proposed resolution. This project is 1&ated in a SPA zone, with a general plan designation of The lot size is 10,34 square feet. The building size is 4085 square feet. preexisting liquor st e and mini convenience store. There are 14 par the 'The Laundry Bas - t" laundromat). Coast Liquor is located o ' the northeast corner of Pacific Coast shares the building with • e other business, a laundromat, building space. The liquor s ore is open from 7:30 A.M. until 1 until 2:00 A.M. on the weekend g - eral commercial. current use is as a spaces (shared with ghway and 4th Street. It cupying 60 percent of the :00 A.M. during the week and Coast Liquor is one of the rema existing businesses - Ring alcoholic beverages which has not obtained a conditional use pe subject to the alc• of amortization ordinance. At their meeting of November 8, 1, • 0, recommended an environmental negative Commission require the applicant/owner to reduce window signage to the maximum of 2 core .pornography would not be allowed and that the owner participate in the EASY Pr e ram the staff environmental review committee tion and recommended that the Planning e the refuse cans inside an enclosure and to -rcent. They also advised the owner that hard ca. se of past A.B.C. violations, it was requested • The requested CUP would authorize th continued genal alcohol sales, and if approved would allow the sale of adult videos and m. azines. Staffs concerns relative to the . eo sales are major in nat re. The proposed use of a liquor store/video sales could be a d • erous trend for wholesale op - of these types of businesses to mixed usage in establish ents that service neighborhoods. Because of the proximity to residences, within one hun red feet, and the possible availabili to minors for sale. it is felt by staff that this is not a oper mix of businesses. Also, Section 1 -5 of the zoning ordinance states the sale of adult videos should be greater than 100 feet from - sidential property. Staff has no intention of infringing on first amendment rights, but feels such usage is inappropriate. According to the f Attorney, since the proposed video sales are only a business, inciden al to alcohol sales, the City does not have the authority to such, staff recommended that the video sales must remain incidenta store/convenience store and should not represent more than 10 percent of the s mall portion of the ny the sales. As to the liquor s. Since this/is an existing mini market/general alcohol sale business, staff felt that he sale of alcohol/should be allowed to continue, subject to the proposed conditions which are ted to standtrd conditions of the zoning ordinance and conditions related to the trash . • d the signage. The standard conditions include a'provision to require that single containers b sold in/clear bags. Also, the Police Department has requested that an additional stan.: rd condition be included to require alcohol sale establishments to participate in the EASY P.C. Minutes 1/2/91 January 8, 1992 s/'y.��.� Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of January 14, 1992 RECOMMENDATION FOR JOINT MEETINGS RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that: 1. City Council discuss holding joint meetings with the School District, the Planning Commission, and the Chamber of Commerce to address matters of mutual concern; 2. Set dates for those meetings; and 3. Select topics of discussion for the agenda of the meetings. BACKGROUND: At the City Council / Planning Commission workshop meeting of December 12, 1991, Chamber of Commerce member Dick McCurdy requested that a joint meeting be held between the Council, the Planning Commission and the Chamber of Commerce. It was discussed and decided that it would be beneficial to hold joint meetings between the groups. It was the consensus that: 1. A joint meeting with the City Council, the School District and the Planning Commission should be held in March 1992 on either the second or third Thursday night of the month; 2. A date for a joint meeting with the City Council, the Planning Commission and the Chamber of Commerce should be discussed and set at the Council meeting of January 14, 1992; and 3. The next joint meeting between the City Council and the Planning Commission should be held in June 1992 on either the second or third Thursday of the month. Respectfully mitted, Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager 11b HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1035 VALLEY DRIVE/ P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 Kathleen Midstokke, Mayor City of Hermosa Beach City Hall/Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mayor Midstokke: RECEIVED JAN 0 6 1992 CITY MGR. OFFICE January 5, 1992 Thank you for your letter of December 17, 1991 concerning a joint meeting of the Chamber, City Council and Planning Commission. It is our request that all 3 groups be invited to participate if it is logistically possible for the Council to work it out. As was done last year, we will provide you with a list of suggested subjects 2 weeks prior to the meeting and ask that you do the same. We appreciate this opportunity to network with all of you and hope the results will be very positive. Cordially, Wes leyy,D. Bush Executive Director • .M. City of Hermosa 1r3. eadt� Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive. Hermosa Beach. California 90254-3885 December 17, 1991 Wesley Bush, Executive Director Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce 323 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Wes: At the City Council/Planning Commission workshop meeting of December 12, 1991, Chamber of Commerce member Dick McCurdy requested that the next joint meeting of the City Council and the Chamber of Commerce also include the Planning Commission. Please inform your Board of Directors of this request and respond in writing whether this is a request of the majority of Chamber directors. Please also indicate what subjects they feel might be appropriate for all three boards to be discussing. Your response is needed by Tuesday, January 7 for inclusion in the City Council packet, as this is an agenda item for the January 14, 1992 Council meeting. Sincerely, Kathleen Midstokke Mayor KM/1d December 29, 1991 TO: COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: ROBERT BENZ RE: SPECIAL MEETING RECEIVED DEC 3 0 1991 CITY MGR. OFFICE The selection of City Manager is the most important decision we will make in our tenure. A competent City Manager will make our jobs much easier via application of proper management techniques which are presently lacking. With that in mind, I voted along with the majority of the council to view the resumes. "Lending to an assumed disclosure of confidential information" is not only a very poor reason to withhold information from councilmembers, but on its face, the phrase doesn't mean anything. One can assume anything might happen. The suggestion that the "assumed disclosure" is "illegal" is certainly a new perspective of law where guilt is determined by assumption. Resumes are crucial information required for the upcoming selection of City Manager. In my opinion, it would be irresponsible and a violation of the public trust not to carefully study each and every resume. There seems to be a role reversal with regard to confidential information which is disturbing. The inference of the reasoning used to argue against dissemination of resumes to Councilmembers is that the City Council can't be trusted with confidential information. Dissemination of information is necessary for my informed decision. I request a copy of all the resumes. I tried to inspect the resumes on December 26th, and completed only 15 of the total number of resumes before I was asked to leave by the City Workers. Given the amount of time I must devote on my air pollution mitigation project in Palm Desert, the requirement that I only look at the resumes in the upstairs meeting room at City Hall is unreasonable and inconvenient. The special meeting dictated that councilmembers be allowed to view all the resumes only in the meeting room at City Hall. Upon inspection of resumes on December 26th, I have reason to suspect that all the resumes which were submitted to Mr. Kreins are not present. I urge that the council direct Mr. Kreins to submit all resumes to the council. I was informed by the City Attorney that individual councilmembers are not entitled to any information. Since section 2-15 of the Hermosa Beach Code allows the right of inquiry, I would like a written opinion from the City Attorney outlining information that page 1 1 1 C I as an individual councilmember am entitled. I would like the City Council to request from Ed Kreins and City Attorney Vose a disclosure of conflicts either may have with any of the applicants for City Manager. Previous to the special meeting of December 23rd, I was given a memorandum by the City Attorney which was labeled as "Confidential" and concerned with the "Requirements of Confidentiality" and the "potential penalties and liability which may be incurred for the public release of confidential documents. Mr. Vose states as follows: "Each of the provisions permitting a city council to meet in closed session is a privilege of the city, and may only be waived by a majority vote of the city council. 2. Witkin, California Evid. 2d, Sec. 1114, Pg. 1054. Examination of Witkin Pg 1054 Sec. 1114 reveals nothing pertaining to the waiving of the Attorney/Client privilege by Council Members. Indeed, Witkin Pg. 1054 cautions public officials against inflating confidentiality. Citing Sacramento Newspaper Guild v. Sacramento County Bd. of Supervisors (1968) 263 C.A. 2d 41: "Public board members, sworn to uphold the law, may not arbitrarily or unnecessarily inflate confidentiality for the purpose of deflating the spread of the public meeting law. Neither the attorney's presence nor the happenstance of some kind of lawsuit may serve as the pretext for secret consultations whose revelation will not injure the public interest. To attempt a generalization embracing the occasions for genuine confidentiality would be rash." Mr. Vose further refers to Upjohn and cites some numbers which I feel are in error. I cannot find the Upjohn case he mentions. Therefore, I cannot lend much credence to this "confidential memorandum" dated December 20, 1991 from the City Attorney. I feel the memorandum was unprofessional and not up to quality we should expect from our City Attorney. Furthermore, I feel that many items which to date have been discussed in closed executive meetings should have been discussed in public, since there is little chance of such revelation injuring the public interest. On the contrary, the revelation of lawsuits and the associated legal expense is of utmost concern to the public. For example, the special meeting of December 23rd 1991 was not a meeting which should have been held in a closed session since the topic of the meeting was the dissemination of page 2 resumes for City Manager to the councilmembers. I expressed my objection prior to retiring to the executive meeting room. Given the fact that we will be hiring a new City Manager after February 26, 1992, I think it prudent that the Director of Public Works not be appointed until the new City Manager is hired. This will give the new City Manager added freedom in the managing of the Public Works Department. page 3 TO: COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: ROBERT BENZ RE: 1. SELECTION CRITERIA OF 6 FINALIST FOR CITY MANAGER. 2. REQUEST OF INFORMATION PERTAINING TO MEMO DATED 12-20-91 This memo suggest that the Council is not authorized to delegate its duty to select a City Manager particularly where the Council has not identified the criteria to be used in screening applications. Its is recommended that some of the facts be established as follows: 1. An opinion of the City Attorney setting forth the authority of the Council to contract with Mr. Kreins to screen applicants; a. with criteria established by the Council, b. with criteria presented by individual members of the Council without a hearing, c. with criteria developed by Mr. Kreins. 2. I request identification of all the criteria given to Mr. Kreins, and the source and authority for that criteria, and a copy of the contract made with Mr. Kreins concerning his search services. I further request any conflicts the City Attorney may have with any of the candidates for City Manager be disclosed, and that copies of the resumes be made available. I would appreciate this information before the next Council meeting. Analysis: The city manager serves at the pleasure of the city council. There can be no question that some criteria for the administrative and executive ability and qualifications of the City Manager position should have been established if the Council is to evaluate those qualities. If the Council contracts for someone to make choices without setting forth the criteria , then the Council is abdicating its duty under the Code. It was my campaign pledge to abolish the 6% utility tax. I feel that a competent manager is necessary to accomplish this task. This is my "pleasure" and I know that Mr. Kreins does not know "my pleasure". Therefore, I am opposed to being restricted to interviewing the six finalist suggested by Mr. Kreins. I want to include some other candidates which I and other Councilmembers wish to interview. The Mayor's letter where she cites N.S. 211 only solidifies my position that individual councilmembers are entitled to copies of the resumes. Citation N.S. 211 should be adhered to in its strictest manner. N.S. 211 new nomenclature is Section 2-23: I 1 purpose i ur "The ose of this article is, first to establish an i equitable and uniform system for the selection and promotion of l employees of the city on the basis of merit, experience and record, in order to attract and retain the most competent and i courteous public servants to handle the city's business etc." i I I 1 This section sets up the civil service system. It is important that section 2-24 is also included since it is also part of N.S. 211 and states as follows: "2-24. The provisions of this article shall apply to all offices, except the following exemptions:... (f) City manager (g) City attorney. The exception of City Manager is set forth in 2-24' because the City Manager serves at the pleasure of the Council. CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM DATED 12-20-91 I have several requests pertaining to the so called "confidential memorandum" dated December 20, 1991 from the City Attorney. There are serious and misleading errors contained in the memo which I can enumerate upon request. This leads me to conclude that the document is not worth the paper on which its printed and further leads me to request the following information: 1. Why this document came into existence? 2. Did a councilmember ask Vose to draft the letter? 3. Has the City been charged for the time in preparation of the memo, or will there be a future billing? If there is a billing for this memo, it is recommended that no attorney charge be made to the City, especially in light of the inaccuracies and the unprofessional quality of the piece. It is my opinion that Mr. Vose is taking an advocates position with respect to the status of the law, and using his speculations of law to cause the members of the City Council to march to his tune. The advises of the City Attorney have prevented me and other councilmembers from viewing the resumes of applicants for the position of City Manager. Not only are we entitled to see these resumes, but it is our duty under Section 2.7 of the Code. Further, his directions resulted in the need to have another special meeting to direct staff to release the resumes for my viewing. This Council has been the unfortunate victim of erroneous legal advises and the City should not pay for his services in connection with these advises. TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: ROBERT BENZ RE: SPECIAL MEETING DECEMBER 23, 1991 Pursuant to the authority of Section 2-2.13 of the Hermosa Beach City Code, Article I, I would like the minutes to show that I am opposed to the action relating to the referenced closed executive session for the following reasons: 1. There is no basis to call a closed session. The subject matter of the meeting was to determine my right to examine the resumes of applicants for the position of City Manager. See announcement in Los Angeles Times, This Week's Highlights on 12/26/91. There is no authority to conduct a closed session concerning the subject matter. 2. I have a right to examine the resumes. The action taken limiting my inspection rights s contrary to my rights, and the council was without author ake the limitation. Dated: I- 7-1 ROBER Councilmember Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT DECEMBER 1991 ACTIVITY REPORT Parking Cites Issued Vehicles Impounded/Booted Calls Responded To Booting Revenue Dismissals processed Citations Issued Warnings Issued Complaints Responded To Total Number of Animals Picked -Up of which: Returned to Owner Taken to Shelter Injured, taken to Vet Deceased CONCUR: 1// en y L. Staten, Acting General Services Director Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager PARKING ENFORCEMENT Current Month 2,835 28 105 $7,240 344 47 0 116 43 This Month Last Year 3,464 24 91 $9,097 N/A ANIMAL CONTROL 26 0 41 38 8 7 3 20 January 14, 1992 City Council Meeting of January 28, 1992 Fiscal Year To Date 33,284 180 676 $43,785 3,215 216 0 494 302 111 177 (9) (83) Last Fiscal Year To Date 39,628 295 853 $21,126 N/A 222 0 360 333 113 104 29 104 Respectfully submitted to, Henry L. Staten, Acting General Services Director by 7,e'.t.a—t-c-- Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide COMMENTS: Positive enforcement of the Public Information Program, has reduced the number of citations issued. One IOD vacancy, and two vacant full-time positions to be filled, contributed to the reduced cite count. Dismissed cita- tions reflect those citations dismissed during the month, not Dec. exclusively. HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DECEMBER 1991 .STAFF REPORTS PREPARED January 22, 1992 Regular Meeting of January 28 , 1992 MEETINGS / SEMINARS 'MEETINGS 23 1 20 1 1771' 170 CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES INITIAL INSPECTIONS THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE APPEAL / CITY COUNCIL RECONSIDERATION 0 0 3 7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CONDO) 1 0 6 11 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (COMMERCIAL) 1 3 12 16 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 0 0 6 10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION 0 1 2 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/ MAP EXTENSION 0 0 4 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 0 0 0 FINAL MAP 0 1 9 14 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1 0 1 24 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0_ 0 0 1 NONCONFORMING REMODEL 1 0 6 1 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 0 3 2 PARKING PLAN 1 0 2 3 SPECIAL STUDY 0 0 3 0 SUBDIVISION 1 1 2 4 TEXT AMENDMENT 0 0 2 10 TRANSIT 1 0 4 2 VARIANCE 1 1 2 2 ZONE CHANGE 0 0 1 18 MISCELLANEOUS 3 3 36 11 MEETINGS / SEMINARS 'MEETINGS 23 1 20 1 1771' 170 CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES INITIAL INSPECTIONS 16 8 68 108 FOLLOW UP INSPECTIONS 7 10 63 79 LETTERS GENERATED 17 40 • 123 225 MEMOS GENERATED 2 7 19 45 C.U.P. ACCEPTANCE FORMS RECEIVED 3 3 16 19 C.U.P. COVENANT FORMS GENERATED 5 0 32 0 C.U.P. COVENANT FORMS RECEIVED 4 0 28 0 CITATIONS ISSUED 0 0 0 1 14 C.U.P. VIOLATIONS ABATED 10 2 73 WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP MUNICIPAL AREA EXPRESS (MAX) RIDERSHIP BEACH ROUTE 1 959 1 840 1 8583 7699 BUDGET (FOR 50% OF FY) EXPENDITURE (COMPARE TO BUDGET ESTIMATE) THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE HERMOSA BEACH PASSENGERS 1051 624 11602 4922 REDONDOBEACHPASSENGERS 4015 3441 30538 23322 SATELLITE PASSENGERS 409 274 2723 1942 MUNICIPAL AREA EXPRESS (MAX) RIDERSHIP BEACH ROUTE 1 959 1 840 1 8583 7699 BUDGET (FOR 50% OF FY) EXPENDITURE (COMPARE TO BUDGET ESTIMATE) 9%- 35% - REVENUE (COMPARE TO BUDGET ESTIMATE) 44%+ 2%+ The Following Activities Were Undertaken for Transit Projects 1. Routine tasks. Upcoming Agenda Items to City Council 1. Appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a Vestng Tentative Parcel Map /123246 to subdivide 2 lots into 3 lots at 206-212 Prospect Avenue. Long Term Projects Underway 1. Recovering permit authority from Coastal Commission. 2. Updating zoning ordinance for compliance with current law, clarification of intent, and procedural correctness. 3. Starting work on Conditional Use Permit for oil drilling project. 4. Updating Land Use Element and other General Plan Elements. CON UR: i� %ice . Michael Schubach Planning Director Respectfully submitted, Yu-Ying Tmg Administrative Aide Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager pc/activity January 21, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council January 28, 1992 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES DECEMBER, 1991 ACTIVITY REPORT The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of December. RECREATION PROGRAMMING December 3 - The 6th annual tree lighting ceremony sparked off the Holiday Season. Participants were entertained by Hermosa Valley School band and the children were surprised by Santa's arrival on a L. A. County lifeguard truck. Approximately 200 people joined in the festivities. December 19 - Once again inclement weather foiled our plans to hold caroling on the beach. However, all was not lost because the Hermosa Civic Theatre provided a warm and dry alternative. Los Cancioneros Master Choral lead about 100 participants in Holiday Carols. December 21 - The 3rd annual Sand Snowman Contest was the highlight of the Hermosa holiday activities. A perfect California sunshine day set the tone for participants to create their sand works of art. Penguins Place of Hermosa Beach sponsored the event and provided prizes for all in attendance which totaled 75. December 23 - The children's holiday cookie bake provided all the necessities for children to make and decorate cookies to take home. The Seasprites children's center sent over 20 children and an additional 30 children from the community attended. SPECIAL EVENTS December 18 - The Chamber of Commerce in conjunction with the City held a Holiday home decoration contest. The "Home" award went to Linda Rockwood of 445 - 31st Street, the block of 18th Street between Strand and Hermosa Avenue received the "Neighborhood" award and the "Business" award went to Loreto Plaza. COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION December 6 - Over 450 ski enthusiasts came to the Hermosa Civic Theatre to watch Warren Miller's newest film Born to Ski. December 19 - A special Foundation meeting was held so Board Members could discuss a list of entertainers for the upcoming year. The following entertainers were selected for the 1992 Entertainment Series. Friday, March 13: Sat., March 28: Fri., April 3: Sat., April 11: Sat., May 2: Fri., May 22: Sat., June 6: Liona Boyd - solo guitarist Manly Moondogs and the Three Cool Cats David Richter - Solo classical guitarist Grant Geissman - Jazz Susan J. Paul - Folk, Blues, Rock & Jazz David Wilcox - Folk Bobby Lyle - Solo keyboards FILM PERMITS One still photography permit was processed from Allen Photography. Permit fees were $104.50. Charles MISCELLANEOUS Staff completed the Spring, 1992 Recreation Program schedule and submitted it to the typesetter and printer. The brochure is scheduled to be mailed in late January. Facility Field Theatre Clark Gym Room 4 Room 7 Room 8 Room 10 Room 12 DEPARTMENT REVENUE Current Month 12/91 User Hours 12/90 User Hours 75 89 186 189 Leased 21 71 74 60 111 105 191 258 48 11 97 68 59 This month FY Last FY Last FY To Date To Date $20,998.50 $11,918.00 $163,159.50 $129,400.68 Revenue Projection: $321,000 Community Resources Department general fund revenue for 50% of the fiscal year is $163,159 or 51% of the projected figure. Community Resources Department general fund expenditure for 50% of the fiscal year is $199,234 or 51% of the budget FY 1991-92. Noted: Mary C. Ro• e:f, Director Dept. of •miiunity Resources Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Respectfully submitted, 1 l of BeYser, Recreation Specialist Dept. of Community Resources HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1991 Dea 31, 1991 FIRE STATISTICS This Month This Month One Year Ago --. +-- Year to Date Last Year To Date Total Calls 27 50 587 781 (types) False Alarms 4 3 481 63 Mutual Aid 2i 3 10 21 Paramedic assists 9 181 309 395 .................._.... . _...........,...«......-.._..__»_......,_«..............«..«. ............. Residence Fire 5 9 37 64 Commercial Fire 3 3 30 26 +- .........«-..._.. ___..+.._.._...«..«.«_ Vehicle Fire31 1 251 18 ._.«..........«...«.......«.....«.«.«-4..««..._«...._..._...... 4......_ W.«.«...««...««....«.....J.««...... 4 Hazardous Mtls. 2 01 431 48 «.........««....«O.«...«.«.«.«...«««..._.....q««.«._.«....... q«..... ........ .J ...«......««., Other 81 1 3E 146 .+. PARAMEDIC STATISTICS Total Responses 591 631 868i 1001: (types) No Patient/aid 4 6 731 84 Medical 27 301 3591 431 Trauma 28 271 416 515 ---+ Auto Accident 12 12 1711 1761 Assault 6€ 5 84 92 Jail Call 1 51 47 571 Transports 311 29 410: 496; Base Hosp.Con. 151 211 3671 3881 Trauma Center 01 0 9' 15 • STRAND AND BEACH CALLS 1 Medical only 0' 231 60i Ocean Accident 1 01 8 8 ---4..-......««..»....._..__....-.+-.........-..-.«_».._«..•--O--•-----•.. Beach Accident 0 01 1': 1 Bike v Bike 0 01 0 11 Bike v Ped 01 01 21 11 4-- --.._-...+---« 4..._.._ Fall off Bike 01 0 7 1 12 Skater v Skater 01 01 01 0 Skater v Ped O1 01 Oi 0 Fall off Skates 21 01 101 « 10: -- Bike/Skater v Other: 0 01 4 31 Assault 01 01 5 0 4 (primary) INSPECTIONS and PREVENTION 4 + ...._««.» +- e...«......._.«.._»»._.«._.e....«..__._..__� w « Commercial 122: 150: 811: t 076: Assembly 1 i 31 6 12 Institutions 3 0 7 23 Industrial 2 2 7 12? ............ Apartments 661 1351 56-7 851; (re—inspections) Commercial 43 67 395 430= Assembly 2; 3 6 6 Institutions 01 °31 41 5 ....._«........._..._....._..«.__«....0.........._._.._....._...»_...+-••_....««.«.....«+ 04. w + Industrial 2 0 4 1 Apartments 19 491 420: 353: Fumigations 121 161 1271 1551 --+ + + ..._........ ._... ......__.....+................. ».+ Respectfully Subm Ate 40. N-«......._. ...._.._..«+ Steve 5. Visniewski . Interim City Manager January 21, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 28, 1992 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT; DECEMBER 1991 - The State Controller's Office audited state grants received in prior years for recreation facilities. Records being audited went back as far as 1976; staff was able to provide all required information. - Two reimbursements were received in December from the State for mandated costs programs - $16,024 for Regional Housing Needs and $876 for Business Tax Reporting. Both claims were over a year old. STATISTICAL SECTION MONTHNT ITLASTMFYTH I DATED I TOST FY DATE CITATION PAYMENTS 2,952 3,957 22,983 28,219 INVOICES 7 13 59 90 CASH RECEIPTS 1,161 1,127 9,466 9,984 WARRANTS 307 141 2,043 1,664 PURCHASE ORDERS 352 160 2,269 2,111 UUT EXEMPTIONS 676 658 FILED TO DATE PAYROLL FULL TIME 161 162 PART TIME 62 60 DISCOUNTS TAKEN $ 174.06 Noted: Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager $ 1,204.33 Viki Copeland Finance Director 1 HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT I MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1991 December OFFENSES REPORTED This Month This Month Year to Date Last Year One Year Ago To Date Murder 0 0 01 0 Rape 0 0 2 3 Robbery 1 2 33 26 Assault 4 10 125 128 Burglary 29 22 323 341 Larceny 60 37 682 496 Motor Vehicle Theft 8 15 165 129 DUI 551 56 395 444 All Other Offenses 290 276 3871 4054 Disturbance Calls 1811 2021 3226 3353 PERSONS ARRESTED Adults 102 138 1226 1350 Juveniles 71 13 80 118 Criminal Citations 75 85 1005 1717 Bicycle/Skateboard Cites 0 0 65 57 TRAFFIC REPORTI ACCIDENTS Fatal 0 0 2 0 Injury 8 5 126 107 Property Damage Only 241 31 376 274 CITATIONS Traffic 364 566 4693 6290 Parking 2 11 111 202 CALLS FOR SERVICE Total Calls 2037 2475 31001 34166 Noted: Respectfully Submitted, v a i .44014e4 Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager Val Streser I 1 Acting Director of Public Safety January 13, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council January 28, 1992 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT DECEMBER 1991 ACTIVITY REPORT Conducted testing for Equipment Mechanic. Concluded recruitment for Clerk Typist. Current This Month FY to Last FY to STATISTICAL SECTION: Month Last Year Date to Date Worker Comp Claims: Claims Opened 1 3 27 17 Claims Closed 1 1 32 35 Total Open 75 58 75 58 Lost Time (Manhours) Safety 300 * 2,108 * Non -safety 276 * 2,556 * Liability Claims: Claims opened 3 2 33 15 Claims closed 7 2 35 16 Total open 40 27 40 27 Employee Involved Vehicle Accidents: Safety 0 * 4 Non -safety 0 Employee Turnover: Safety 0 Non -safety 0 * * * 4 1 7 * Information not maintained in this format last fiscal year. General Appropriations Secretary: The following summary indicates the amount of the assigned functions: December: 140 hours available Word Processing Mail Processing 74% (104 hrs) 10% (14 hrs) Avg. 7.43 hrs/day Avg. 1 hr/day Word Processing Services by Department: Finance 23% (24 hrs) City Manager: 6% ( 6 hrs) Respectfully Submitted, Robert A. Blackwood, Director Personnel and Risk Management pers/act of time spent on each Directory/Dept Support 16% (22 hrs) Avg. 1.57 hrs/day Public Works: Personnel • Noted: 38% 33% (39 hrs) (35 hrs) Steve S. Wisniewski Interim City Manager January 21, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 28, 1992 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - DECEMBER 1991 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration function coordinates and blends the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager; includes engineering and management of capital improvement projects. Permits Issued: Type Current Month Last FY To Date This Month FY Last FY To Date Sewer Demolition Sewer Lateral Street Excavation Utility Co's only Dumpster/Strand Banner Permits 0 1 6 19 1 2 3 8 2 6 29 41 75 58 107 81 1 3 18 4 1 0 9 8 ENGINEERING The Capital Improvement Projects which are currently in progress are: CIP 85-137 FAU, Asphaltic Over- lay, Valley, Ardmore & Prospect CIP 89-144 Strand Walk & Walkway CIP 89-150 Misc. Traf. Sig. Imp. CIP 90-151 Traf. Eng. Program CIP 91-165 Misc. Bikeway Const. CIP 86-176 CIP 89-406 CIP 89-511 CIP 89-513 CIP 89-515 CIP 89-604 MAINTENANCE The maintenance function of the Public Works following sections: - Parks/Medians - Street Maintenance/Sanitation - Sewers/Storm Drains - Street Lighting Traf. Control Pre-emp. Sewer Rehab/Area 4 R -R -O -W Parking Lot Purchase of 5 Lots at Edith Rodaway Friendship Park Purchase of South School Various Build. Imp. Department is divided into - Traffic Safety - Building Maintenance - Equipment Service the Parks Division/Medians: Spread chips on the Greenbelt. Irrigation repairs city-wide. Assembled park benches for parks city-wide. Planted Poinsettias in downtown area and on Pier Avenue from Hermosa Avenue to Valley Drive. Street Maintenance/Sanitation: Sidewalk & street repairs city-wide. Patched cracks on Strand walkway. Remove & replaced broken meter poles on Hermosa Avenue. Cored and patched holes in Strand walk for inspection of concrete. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Rodded sewer mains city-wide. Opened storm drain outlets on Beach and cleaned storm drain inlets City-wide. Street Lighting: Finished storing Christmas decorations on Hermosa Avenue, Pier Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. Hung banners City-wide. Installed new electrical wiring at 6th Street & Prospect School. Installed new electrical wiring at Valley Park. Replaced tower light fixture and yolk. Repair & relamped street lights city-wide Traffic Safety Division: Painted wall and ceiling at 6th Street & Prospect School (off-white). Helped street lighting Division finish storing Christmas decorations. Worked on windmill at Greenwich Park. Building Maintenance Division: Painted lobby of Theater. Finished painting of school at 6th Street & Prospect. Equipment Service: On-going maintenance of City vehicles and equipment. Graffiti Removal: JULY 1990 AUGUST 1990 SEPTEMBER 1990 OCTOBER 1990 NOVEMBER 1990 DECEMBER 1990 JANUARY 1991 FEBRUARY 1991 MARCH 1991 APRIL 1991 MAY' 1991 JUNE 1991 YTD TOTAL Res • . tfully' //, _!r / % _ B•,1Glicm.' 39.75 48.00 30.00 81.50 79.00 41.00 33.75 29.50 35.00 70.75 40.50 21.50 Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. 550.25 Hrs. ted, JULY 1991 AUGUST 1991 SEPTEMBER 1991 OCTOBER 1991 NOVEMBER 1991 DECEMBER 1991 terim Director of Public Works mon2/pwadmin YTD TOTAL 59.50 27.00 43.50 37.50 24.00 27.00 Hrs. Hrs. (Revised) Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. 157.00 Hrs. Steve Wisniewski Acting City Manager „Honorable Mayor and January 21, 1991 Members of the City Council ACTIVITY REPORT DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY DECEMBER, 1991 Attached for your information are recap sheets of department activity for the month of December. Overall permit activity decreased in December as the department issued 68 permits of which 22 were building permits. Two permits were issued for sin- gle family dwellings and one permit was issued for a duplex dwelling. Eleven permits were issued for alterations or additions to existing dwell- ings and six permits were issued for alterations to commercial buildings. Two dwelling units were demolished resulting in a net increase of two dwelling units to the housing inventory. The department also processed thirty-four plans for zoning review, plan check or revisions. Plan processing "turn around” averaged under one week during December. The department conducted 130 inspections during December not including complaint investigations. Building Department general fund revenue for 50% of the fiscal year is $167,136.53 or 45.3% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. Total revenue for all funds is $261,385.05. The Business License division reports that 415 licenses were issued during December resulting in revenue of $51,558.97. Business License revenue to date represents 55.8% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. The department logged 14 new code enforcement complaints during December, of which one was for illegal dwelling units. The department closed one case during December and currently has twenty-five illegal dwelling unit cases under investigation. The December report on recycling participation levels and refuse diversion is attached to this report. The report indicates that the participation level (at least one recyclable item set out) averaged 69.3% in December. The total volume of recyclable materials collected in December totaled 211.7 tons and represents a diversion of 26.1% of the residential refuse that would otherwise likely end up in a landfill. Respectfully Submitted, �'U Vti01^-�i William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety Noted: Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT Month of DECEMBER 1991 NUMBER OF PERMITS Building Plumbing Electric Plan Check Sewer Use Res. Bldg. Reports Comm. Inspections Parks & Recreation In lieu Park & Rec. Board of Appeals Sign Review Fire Flow Fees Legal Determination Zoning Appeals CURRENT MONTH 22 26 20 10 1 11 16 1 0 0 5 4 0 0 THIS MONTH LAST FY 20 26 18 11 0 11 13 0 0 0 2 6 FY TO DATE 166 150 106 114 8 93 119 3 7 0 29 34 1 0 LAST FY TO DATE 161 141 101 110 7 103 158 0 12 0 27 36 TOTALS 116 107 830 856 FEES Building** Plumbing Electric Plan Check Sewer Use Res. Bldg. Reports Comm. Inspections Parks & Recreation In lieu Park & Rec. Board of Appeals Sign Review Fire Flow Fees Legal Determination Zoning Appeals 9,879.50 1,935.35 3,066.65 809.47 342.55 459.25 668.00 3,500.00 0 0 418.75 4,281.67 0 0 5,875.43 1,302.45 2,322.00 1,673.09 0 440.00 325.00 0 0 0 50.00 2,415.00 85,435.02 11,643.900 10,966.75 46,946.86 6,034.27 3,826.75 4,883.75 10,500.00 46,650.00 0 2,387.50 31,064.25 1,046.00 0 144,814.33 10,423.45 12,441.00 104,071.81 4,263.96 4,000.00 3,875.00 0 77,220 00 0 650 00 126,135.24 TOTALS 25,361.19 14,402.97 261,385.05 487,894.79 VALUATIONS 897,042 440,738 6,425,543 17,579,995 **Includes State Seismic Fee $92.92 Revenue: Licenses issued: BUSINESS LICENSE MONTHLY REPORT 51,558.97 45,957.89 252,433.94 415 379 215,664.22 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED Month of DECEMBER 1991 TYPE OF STRUCTURE DWELLING UNITS PERMITS PROVIDED VALUATION 1. Single Dwellings 2 2 584,000 2. Duplex Dwellings 1 2 218,000 3. Triplex Dwellings 4. Four Units or More 5. Condominiums 6. Commercial Buildings 7. Industrial Buildings 8. Publicly Owned Buildings 9. Garages - Residential 10. Accessory Buildings 11. Fences and Walls 12. Swimming Pools 13. Alterations, additions or repairs to dwellings 11 65,742 14. Alterations, additions or repairs to Commercial Bldgs. 6 29,300 15. Alterations, additions or repairs to indus. bldgs. 16. Alterations, additions or repairs to publicly owned bldgs. 17. Alterations, additions, repairs to garages or accessory bldgs. 18. Signs 19. Dwelling units moved 20. Dwelling units demolished 2 -2 21. All other permits not listed TOTAL PERMITS: 22 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: 897,042 ** TOTAL DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED : 4 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DEMOLISHED: 2 NET CHANGE: +2 NET DWELLING UNIT CHANGE FY 91/92 +7 CUMULATIVE DWELLING UNIT TOTAL: 9690 (INCLUDES PERMITS ISSUED) ** Revised figure based on land use study by the Planning Dept. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RECYCLENOW REPORT DECEMBER 1991 TRASH YDWST TOTAL ONP COMM DATE RATE ACTUAL MAX % DIV. TONS TONS MIXED GLASS TIN ALUM PET HDPE MIXED WST/TONS 12/2 60.4% 1,101 1.823 24.4% 37.19 12.0 17,270 5,058 642 248 161 368 214 12/3 68.8% 1,120 1,627 25.9% 35.77 12.5 18,360 5,207 559 233 219 226 206 12/4 73.1% 1,094 1,497 26.4% 33.64 12.0 17,770 4,600 587 145 246 378 354 12/5 69.0% 1,078 1.562 24.2% 35.06 11.2 16.700 4.365 457 231 130 265 197 12/9 62.3% 1,135 1,823 26.1% 32.77 11.6 17,160 4,918 415 187 84 247 169 12/10 70.6% 1,149 1,627 25.7% 31.51 10.9 16.100 4,349 522 221 159 232 187 12/11 73.7% 1,104 1,497 28.2% 30.57 12.0 18.410 4.585 487 175 108 158 147 12/12 71.4% 1,115 1.562 26.8% 31.2 11.4 17.830 3,800 432 206 131 271 181 12/16 65.2% 1,189 1,823 26.2% 33.94 12.1 18,330 4,676 422 162 110 272 139 12/17 71.6% 1,165 1,627 25.6% 32.65 11.2 17,130 3.856 492 122 206 317 296 12/18 74.8% 1,120 1,497 28.0% 31.03 12.1 17,830 4,941 530 221 208 215 196 12/19 72.4% 1,131 1,562 26.6% 31.67 11.5 17,390 4,181 531 205 133 304 177 12/23 65.2% 1,188 1,823 25.5% 32.88 11.2 16.830 4.350 455 230 129 264 197 12/24 72.0% 1,172 1.627 26.6% 30.96 11.2 17,490 3.797 456 193 139 203 163 12/26 76.9% 1,151 1.497 27.6% 32.56 12.4 18.680 4,973 528 190 117 172 160 12/27 71.9% 1.123 1.562 27.8% 31.28 12.0 18.000 4.951 418 188 85 248 170 12/30 63.6% 1,159 1,823 23.6% 38.44 11.9 17,480 4,739 538 257 163 338 225 12/31 70.2% 1,142 1,627 25.0% 37.64 12.5 18,850 5,040 455 174 118 293 168 TOT 69.3% 20,436 29,486 26.1% 600.8 211.7 317,610 82,386 8,926 3,588 2,646 4,771 3,546 560.8 BREAKDOWN OF 812.5 TONS OF RESIDENTIAL REFUSE: 73.9% BREAKDOWN OF 1373.3 TONS OF TOTAL CITY REFUSE: 43.7% BREAKDOWN OF BREAKDOWN OF BREAKDOWN OF 211.7 TONS 812.5 TONS 1373.3 TONS AVERAGE WEEKLY VOLUME OF AVERAGE WEEKLY VOLUME OF AVERAGE WEEKLY VOLUME OF AVERAGE WEEKLY VOLUME OF OF RECYCLABLES: OF RESIDENTIAL REFUSE: OF CITY REFUSE: CITY REFUSE: COMMERCIAL REFUSE: RESIDENTIAL REFUSE: RECYCLABLE MATERIAL: TOTAL ONP TONS MIXED GLASS 100% 75.0% 19.5% 26.1% 19.5% 5.1% 15.4% 11.6% 3.0% 289.1 118.1 126.5 44.6 COMM TIN ALUM. PET HDPE MIXED WASTE/TONS --- ---- --- ---- 2.1% 0.8% 0.6% 1.1% 0.8% 0.5% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 40.8% CITY OF HERMOSA BRACH ROCTCL6NOR tuttutttttttttittttititottitt SUMMARY R6P081 titt mtttttt RISID8IITIAL PARTICIPATION ARIGHT OF R6CTCLABLB MATERIALS TRASH COM CITTNIDE T144ST TOTAL ONP WASH 8 M041H RATE ACTUAL MAI. 8 DIV. TONS TONS MIND GLASS TIN ALUM. P61 HDPE MIND TNS 860096104 JONI 70.48 18,330 26,036 23.18 527.1 158.0 235,610 63,489 6,202 2,565 1,375 2,804 2,018 593.3 12.41 JULY 70.78 21,898 30,983 23.28 634.3 191.4 298,180 65,059 7,418 3,092 2,153 3,949 2,941 802.2 11.88 AUGUST 70.88 19,527 27,598 22.78 554.3 162.9 239,977 66,337 7,466 3,110 2,172 3,849 2,862 746.3 11.18 SEPTEMBER 70.68 19,680 27,859 25.18 539.6 180.8 213,050 69,390 7,343 3,182 2,000 3,840 2,745 611.1 13.58 OCTOBER 69.98 21,478 30,722 25.58 593.7 203.5 316,416 69,789 7,922 3,294 2,284 4,128 3,083 586.2 14.78 408600E8 67.98 17,685 26,036 22.68 482.2 140.8 212,186 53,734 5,992 2,522 1,719 3,083 2,280 540.7 12.18 DICIMBRR 69.38 20,436 29,486 26.18 600.8 211.1 317,610 82,386 8,926 3,588 2,646 4,171 3,546 560.8 15.48 JANUARY 81690090 MARCH APRIL MAT RO AVG. 70.08 19,862 28,389 24.11 562 178 270,433 67,169 7,324 3,050 2,050 3,775 2,782 635 13.08 BIDIMPTION DOLLARS RICIIV6D YTD JON JUL AUG SIP OCT NOV DEC JAN TIB MAR APR MAT TOTAL 042/81188: TONS 117.8 149.1 120.0 136.5 158.2 106.1 158.8 1051.5 $ PRR TOM $15 315 $15 315 $15 $15 315 N.A. TOTAL $1,767.15 32,236.35 $1,799.85 $2,047.95 82,373.15 $1,591.35 32,382.00 $14,197.80 COMMI6GL8D: MIS 40.2 42.3 42.9 42.2 45.3 34.7 52.9 300.54 $ FIR TON 340 $40 340 $40 340 $40 340 N.A. TOTAL $1,608.80 $1,692.40 $1,716.00 31,688.00 31,812.00 31,388.40 32,116.00 312,021.60 TOTAL 33,375.95 $3,928.75 $3,515.85 33,735.95 $4,185.15 $2,979.75 34,498.00 326,219.40 f C r C 1.