Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/14/92• SPE.,AD +-19eft.`14, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, April 14, 1992, at the hour of 7:0 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - The closed session was held at 7: P.M. regard- ing matters of litigation, Boccato vs City of Hermosa Beach: pur- suant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a); and matters of Per- sonnel. The closed session was recessed at 7: P.M. to the regular scheduled public meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Aleks Dankers, Hermosa Valley School, Student of the Month ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Wiemans, Mayor Midstokke Absent: None HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL STUDENT OF THE MONTH: Aleks Dankers Mayor Midstokke as the Hermosa month of March, ture endeavors. congratulated Aleks Dankers for being recognizes Valley School, "Student of the Month", for the 1992, and wished him (?) *** success in his fu- ******� �� ***��poke of Aleks' achievements. PROCLAMATION: Cancer Awareness Month, April, 1992 Mayor Midstokke proclaimed the month of April, 1992 as "CANOE AWARENESS MONTH" APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE: A. Designate Mayor for a term ending January 26, 1993 Action: To designate Councilmember Robert Essertier as Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach for a term ending January 26, 1993. Motion /4, secondb0 . The motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page 1 1 Newly designated Mayor Essertier thanked B. Designate Mayor Pro Tempore for a term ending January 26, 1993 Action: To designate Councilmember Albert Wiemans as Mayor Pro Tempore of the City of Hermosa Beach for a term ending January 26, 1993. Motion /j'), second 46. The motion carried unanimously. C. Intergovernmental agencies requiring appointment of Mayor as delegate. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April Action: To appoint Mayor Essertier as delegate to Motion( , secondj . The motion carried unanimously. OL° The meeting recessed at 3:077 P.M. 1/;( / 1✓ � Y (I) The meeting reconvened at 8 :- P.M. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -) '71) Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: 41""12<-.; 1 Je Com- X /`-' ..-.--e. V (, ` Yj2- /) ---— ? , ,e J ,64- ..t 4'1 0 LS—S .-"'-4W ,P1, Com-' GJ 0 .:� ----- - a er Dr—ay 9a-. rn y5 67----37/ Gy, Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, I' �>' Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., Jerry Compton - 832 Seventh Street, City Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page 2 • Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, Edie Webber - 1210 Eleventh Street, Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, • -7'1 Y4 .b / . CONSENT CALENDAR a' Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (o), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3 but are listed in order for clarity: (a) ', (b 42, (c) A7 (d) , (e) , (f) /77 , (g)f- (, (h) /7) ,( • ), (j) m , (k) tA�) , (1) , (m) k) , (n),.4_, and (o) Motion �, second )6. So ordered. Coming forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consnt calendar were: N a N - No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. The order of the agenda was suspended at P.M. to the public hearing, Item No. 5. (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on March 24, 1992; 2) Special workshop meeting of City Council, Planning Commission, School Board, Parks & Recreation Com- mission held on March 26, 1992; 3) Special meeting of the City Council held on March 31, 1992. - . 724-/5 1 City Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page 3 (b) Action: To approve the minutes of Recommendation to ratify the following Demands and Warrants: No. 40252, Nos. 40318 through 40381 inclusive, and Nos. 40383 through 40500 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 40320, 40321, 40338, 40383, 40384, 40441, 40442, and 40443; and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. /2f/it), b'/l (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future �'l` Agenda Items. (d) (e) Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented Recommendation to receive and file the March, 1992 in- vestment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary Brutsch dated April 8, 1992. Action: To receive and file the March, 1992 investment report as presented. Recommendation to adopt resolution adding City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin to the list of authorized personnel eligible to utilize the City's Visa card. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 1, 1992. j.4 -aa 9:2-5536 G't L0 - City Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page 4 • (f) .0e7k-) Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-553 , entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 88-5109 RELATING TO AUTHORIZED USERS OF VISA BANK CARD SERVICES FROM CENTINELA-SOUTH BAY CREDIT UNION VISA." Recommendation to approve a transfer of funds in the amount of $40,000 from the Retirement Account ($24,000) and the Employee Benefit Account ($16,000) to the City Attorney Account for Contract Services. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated April 6, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. /L 711 Action: To approve the staff recommendation of the transfer of funds in the amount of $40,000 from the Re- tirement Account ($24,000) and the Employee Benefit Ac- count ($16,000) to the City Attorney Account for Con- tract Services in order to cover an estimated amount of $57,985 for legal costs relating to oil drilling. (O (g) Recommendation to adopt a resolution of intent to study changing the standard conditions contained in Section 10-8 for off -sale alcohol beverage establishments. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 7, 1992. 1,-,...9)/1,-,...9)/leci 6-ih.,,,..., "ii.4.....ce.,..0„,..„) c,,,,; .„,- „....,g__)8) e -E, -.e /1.-7,, !"." ..." a-.) / ...-4fiVOt VI ..--'...-t--"-- .e...__. -7-7. c -) \._. ------::: .-----"--- / y / Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-553:, Entitled, "A_ Y RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO STUDY SECTION 10-8 OF THE ZONING ORDINACE RELATING TO GROCERY STORES AND OTHER OFF -SALE ALCOHOL BEVERAGE ESTABLISHMENTS AND DIRECTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO STUDY CHANGING THE STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR SUCH USES." City Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page 5 r(1 • (h) Recommendation to approve request from Riwanis Club to use the Community Center lawn to sell Christmas trees in 1992. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 6, 1992. Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to approve the request by the Kiwanis Club to operate a fenced and lighted Christmas tree lot on the front lawn of the Community Center, abutting llth Place, from November 21, 1992 through January 1, 1993 with the understanding that Kiwanis will assume all costs for restoring the area back to its original stateand all City costs incurred by the project; provide insurance; and, donate $1,000 or 10% of the net profits to the Com- munityFoundation. Center Foun i a on. �t // "� �- � 0069. -v (i) Recommendation to amend previously approved request from the Women's Professional Volleyball Association to amend June 13-14 contract. Memorandum from Community Resour- ces Director Mary Rooney dated April 1, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the following amendments to the contract of the Women's Professional Bolleyball Association regarding their June 13th and 14th tournament: 1) change the title sponsor from Coors Light to Kahlua thereby making the tournament the "Rahlua Hermosa Open"; and, 2) add Friday, June 12th to the tournament schedule for an additional $1,570 for a total of $4,710 in Gevent fees. /4-/L-14--#(- -1)( (1/ --et) lam" City Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page 6 • 70A U Recommendation to approve a one-year extension of main- tenance contract for services on the City owned tele- phone telephone switching and key equipment. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated February 6, 1992. --e 0.,Q4 w 4, .o(, Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve a one (1) year extension of the maintenance contract ofor services on the City owned telephone switching and key equipment with GTE at a cost of $516.60 per month (a $24 per month increase) for a total cost of $6,199.20; and 2) /1/ Recommendation to adopt resolution with findings for denial of project at 2902 Hermosa Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 7, 1992. au7401.44 1-0--te 4 41- /dJ / y' 9.- j A-^..- - 4,- ` _fir 4.8 Z .s- ---a ----7 1079 ;/ ,-.4" . 1-26-0 o Recommendation o adopt reso u •n approving Final Map #21279 for a two -unit condominium located at 1038 Seventh Street. Memorandum from Plannin Director Michael Schubach dated April 6, 1992. , 7 9„2— 553, LO Q.J, (1) -c 0- V ./° 3/2 v L� f7City�/Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page 7 d' G _ �✓( ` G� �� =2 it" 1/ c-% (k) p_>, fr 71/ • • /r„...-,) f c oar/ � � �•-�.`� `- �� i �'�~"'" � l/; o3 (m) (n) Recommendation to approve request for 30 -day extension of temporary appointment for the Acting General Services Director. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 6, 1992. /0045 y7 --x---7 L(7/ "6/ - Recommendation to adopt a resolution of intent to ini- tiate a text amendment requiring activated carbon ab- sorption filtration systems for certain odor producing businesses and, by minute order, authorize Planning Department and Fire Department staff to attend odor in- spection training sessions conducted by AQMD. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 6, 1992. za 0 4G d cz.z-46 �''i'` / 9� /4 4� , .) V aJ City Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page 8 • (o) Recommendation to receive and file report on removal of hazardous materials from building at Clark Field. Memo- randum from Deputy City Engineer Lynn Terry dated April 8 , 1992. � y�- o/fr 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS/LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) Letter from Daniel & Roberta Kain, 1947 Valley Drive, dated March 20, 1992, regarding block wall construction on their property. Memorandum from Building Director William Grove dated April 7, 1992. fre'rt, /77 f`c't ) ,71_4ze Cf; Pe (b) Letter from Hermosa Beach Little League dated March 26, 11/q 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. cle(?)1) fr2r° Kftli City Council Minutes 04-1,4-92 Page 9 13 L,07 ✓ ,; 1"(-1(vk) 1/1/, 0,4e 7`- � - �- - 61—Qi2A,", cr) 9:77,) a �-� • v, -„,?6,-7., /12 • (c) Letter from Friends of the Library dated March 8, 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. (d) Letter from City Treasurer Gary Bru•sch dated March 30, 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. (e) Letters from Gary W. Bro , 222-1/2 26th St., and Seth Brinks -Brown, 222-1/2 26th St., dated April 2, 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. (f) Letter from Shea Mc rdy, 1113 Valley Drive, dated April 4, 1992 re. Greenbe t parking. City Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page 10 • (g) Letter from Myron and Patricia Gazin, dated April 7, 1992, re. Greenbelt parking PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. ) PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) TO BRING INTO CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRI- ATE BY THE CITY COUNCIL, AND ADOPTION OF A ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 598 FIRST STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 7, 1992. ,44� - oho- o � p/ 73 ( evi-/ aC /?' A ) `;3 a ---1.--4(-14 ,,,,v -T yn 11%) -t/ IPbctr-/41$,,i ec)A,1.,it'el ----zyco' -) T v - -.23 '- 4)/ 1'-;KUNICIPAL MATTERS `� ( bi f r V"4 6. STAFF RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PAY PHONES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. Supplemental memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated April 7, , 1992. (Continued from March 24, 1992 meeting.) �l'� p /A .; 7/ _-----� ,A') `—zn u ge,)// / tixCity Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page 11 .42 • 2-1 Y y ) • 7. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF AGREEMENT FOR INSPECTION AND CON- TRACT ADMINISTRATION, SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION, CIP 88-406. Memorandum from Public Works Director Carl Ma- lone dated March 13, 1992. (Continued from March 24, 1992 meeting.) aP'} 8. PROPOSED RECONFIGURATION OF PARKING LOT "E". Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated April 6, 1992. C #64`'MA-A-1,e,t.. (-,-..-.*Dij . a//,' (' /.)' ' )-------7.0-" U ;)-, ,//' --7----, -_-')-- j"--' °-- __,-, jeAt'4--r-? .,51-"‘''')�J / ,a�-4- / d--Z-s�-/- ._-��� �--�� 6, 9-7:(--'-'447, 7. (-1) c i(7t7 &-j";-4 -- b ---, '1 -) )--7----o'c'' -- 9. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE CONTRACT FOR "FLEET FEET TRI- ATHLETE" TO SPONSOR A SPRINT TRIATHLON SUNDAY, OCTOBER City Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page 12 • 18, 1992. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1992. fit/A 9 c-7 ///—* it) er4r1 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Request of Vehicle Parking District Board to be included in joint workshop meeting with the City Council, Plan- ning Commission and the Chamber of Commerce on May 14, 1992. (Held over from March 24, 1992 meeting for dis- cussion by full Council re. bifurcating meeting.) e/4'41 —7,0-1 /5/ ______ ,o0e ,___ a 0--- e9 0 ))f - (b) Report re. initiative petition to create and designate the Biltmore Site as Open Space O -S-2 for its preserva- tion and use as a public park. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April 6, 1992. 7o4 City Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page 13 • 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (a) (b) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for motion to properly notice hearing on elimination and/or revision of Green- belt parking plan Request by Councilmember Edgerton for clarification or possible amendment, if necessary, to Section 1430 and Section 1432-C (1) of the Zoning Code dealing with com- patibility of a condominium project with the surrounding neighborhood. (c) Request by Councilmember Edgerton to give the Planning Commission members a complete copy of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. City Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page 14 • CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. `yam ) r- • �a ADJOURNMENT City Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page 15 JJi • Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will'attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or oral- ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet com- pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished' on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be- gin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni- ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or- dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi- nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. L. # 57-/067 "Conscience is that still, small voice that is sometimes too loud for comfort." - Bert Murray AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 14, 1992 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 7:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR Robert Essertier MAYOR PRO TEM Albert Wiemans COUNCILMEMBERS Robert Benz Sam Y. Edgerton Kathleen Midstokke CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch INTERIM CITY MANAGER Steve Wisniewski CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart- ment, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Cham- ber of Commerce. During the meeting a packet also is available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL STUDENT OF THE MONTH: Aleks Dankers PROCLAMATION: Cancer Awareness Month, April, 1992 APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEM: A. Designate Mayor for a term ending January 26, 1993 B. Designate Mayor Pro Tempore for a term ending January 26, 1993 C. Intergovernmental agencies requiring appointment of Mayor as delegate. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April RECESS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Councils jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: - 1 - 1. (a) (b) 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on March 24, 1992; 2) Special workshop meeting of City Council, Planning Commission, School Board, Parks & Recreation Com- mission held on March 26, 1992; 3) Special meeting of the City Council held on March 31, 1992. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive, and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the March, 1992 in- vestment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary Brutsch dated April 8, 1992. (e) Recommendation to{adopt resolutiontadding City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin to the list of authorized personnel eligible to utilize the City's Visa card. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 1, 1992. (f) (g) Recommendation to approve a transfer of funds in the amount of $40,000 from the Retirement Account ($24,000) and the Employee Benefit Account ($16,000) to the City Attorney Account for Contract Services. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated April 6, 1992. Recommendation to adopt a resolution of intent to study changing the standard conditions contained in Section 10-8 for off -sale alcohol beverage establishments. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 7, 1992. - 2 - (h) (i) (j) (k) (1) (m) (n) (0) Recommendation to approve request from Kiwanis Club to use the Community Center lawn to sell Christmas trees in 1992. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 6, 1992. Recommendation to amend previously approved request from the Women's Professional Volleyball Association to"amend June 13 -14 -contract. Memorandum from Community Resour- ces Director Mary Rooney dated April 1, 1992. Recommendation to approve a one-year extension of main- tenance contract for services on the City owned tele- phone telephone switching and key equipment. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated February 6, 1992. Recommendation tofadopt resolution with findings for denial of project at 2902 Hermosa Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 7, 1992. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #21279 for a two -unit condominium located at 1038 Seventh Street. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 6, 1992. Recommendation to approve request for 30 -day extension of temporary appointment for the Acting General Services Director. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 6, 1992. Recommendation to adopt a resolution; of intent to ini- tiate a text amendment requiring activated carbon ab- sorption filtration systems for certain odor producing businesses and, by minute order, authorize Planning Department and Fire Department staff to attend odor in- spection training sessions conducted by AQMD. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 6, 1992. Recommendation to receive and file report on removal of hazardous materials from building at Clark Field. Memo- randum from Deputy City Engineer Lynn Terry dated April 8, 1992. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS/LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) Letter from Daniel & Roberta Kain, 1947 Valley Drive, dated March 20, 1992, regarding block wall construction on their property. Memorandum from Building Director William Grove dated April 7, 1992. Letter from Hermosa Beach Little League dated March 26, 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. Letter from Friends of the Library dated March 28, 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) PUBLIC 5. Letter from City Treasurer Gary Brutsch 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. dated March 30, Letters from Gary W. Brown, 222-1/2 26th St., and Seth Brinks -Brown, 222-1/2 26th St., dated April 2, 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. Letter from Shea McCurdy, 1113 4, 1992 re. Greenbelt parking. Letter from Myron and Patricia 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. Valley Drive, dated April Gazin, dated April 7, HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) TO BRING INTO CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRI- ATE BY THE CITY COUNCIL, AND ADOPTION OF A ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 598 FIRST STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 7, 1992. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. STAFF RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PAY PHONES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. Supplemental memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated April 7, 1992. (Continued from March 24, 1992 meeting.) 7. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF AGREEMENT FOR INSPECTION AND CON- TRACT ADMINISTRATION, SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION, CIP 88-406. Memorandum from Public Works Director Carl Ma- lone dated March 13, 1992. (Continued from March 24, 1992 meeting.) 8. PROPOSED RECONFIGURATION OF PARKING LOT "E". Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated April 6, 1992. 9. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE (CONTRACT'FOR "FLEET FEET TRI- ATHLETE" TO SPONSOR A SPRINT TRIATHLON SUNDAY, OCTOBER 18, 1992. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1992. 'r 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Request of Vehicle Parking District Board to be included in joint workshop meeting with the City Council, Plan- ning Commission and the Chamber of Commerce on May 14, 1992. (Held over from March 24, 1992 meeting for dis- cussion by full Council re. bifurcating meeting.) (b) Report re. initiative petition to create and designate the Biltmore Site as Open Space O -S-2 for its preserva- tion and use as a public park. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April 6, 1992. 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (a) (b) (c) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for motion to properly notice hearing on elimination and/or revision of Green- belt parking plan. Request by Councilmember Edgerton for clarification or possible amendment, if necessary, to Section 1430 and Section 1432-C (1) of the Zoning Code dealing with com- patibility of a condominium project with the surrounding neighborhood. Request by Councilmember Edgerton to give the Planning Commission members a complete copy of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT 5 ACTION SHEET ACTION SHEET REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 14, 1992 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 7:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY ALEKS DANKERS ROLL CALL: ALL PRESENT HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL STUDENT OF THE MONTH: Aleks Dankers PROCLAMATION: Cancer Awareness Month, April, 1992 APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEM: A. Designate Mayor for a term ending January 26, 1993 MOTION KM/RB TO DESIGNATE ESSERTIER. SO ORDERED. B. Designate Mayor Pro Tempore for a term ending January 26, 1993 MOTION KM/RB TO DESIGNATE WIEMANS. SO ORDERED. C. Intergovernmental agencies requiring appointment of Mayor as delegate. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April 8, 1992. MOTION AW/RB TO APPOINT RE TO THE L.A. COUNTY CITY SELECTION COM- MITTEE. SO ORDERED. MOTION AW/RB TO APPOINT RE AS DELEGATE AND KM ALTERNATE TO THE SO. BAY CITIES SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD AND THE INGLEWOOD FIRE TRAINING AUTHORITY. SO ORDERED. RECESS AT 7:58 P.M. RECONVENED AT 8:25 P.M. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION RE MOVED THE AGENDA AROUND TO PUT ITEM 12(a) AND THE GREENBELT LETTERS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC HEARING. JOE DIAZ PRESENTED A CHECK FOR $1,183 FROM KIWANIS CLUB TO THE COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION FROM LAST YEAR'S CHRISTMAS TREE LOT PROCEEDS. ACCEPTED BY GEO. SCHMELTZER, PRESIDENT OF THE FOUNDATION. CAROL SIMMONS, 218 LONGFELLOW. COMPLAINED ABOUT CONDUCT OF THE COUNCIL AT THE MARCH 24 MEETING. GERRY COMPTON - CONCERNED ABOUT LANGUAGE IN RESOLUTION OF FINDINGS ON 2902 HERMOSA AVE. RE SAID HE WOULD PULL AND COMMENTS COULD BE MADE AT THAT TIME. BOB DEWITT, 525 SECOND ST. - RE. ITEM 9. WILL SPEAK AT THAT TIME. JUNE WILLIAMS WOULD LIKE ITEM 1G BE PULLED. SE SAID HE WOULD PULL. WILMA BURT - QUESTIONED THE MINUTES AS NOT BEING ACCURATE RE. HER COMMENTS ON 2902 HERMOSA AVE. RE SAID HE WOULD PULL MINUTES. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on March 24, 1992; PAGE 7745 - WILMA BURT STATED HER COMMENTS ON 2902 HERMOSA AVE. WERE INCORRECT AND ASKED THAT THEY BE CORRECTED. MOTION RE/KM TO APPROVE. (b) 2) Special workshop meeting of City Council, Planning Commission, School Board, Parks & Recreation Com- mission held on March 26, 1992; 3) Special meeting of the City Council held on March 31, 1992. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive, and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. PULLED BY KM - QUESTIONED TRAINING FOR PERSONNEL SECRETARIES. AND ICBG TRAINING FOR BLDG. DEPT. MOTION KM/AW TO APPROVE DEMANDS AND WARRANTS. SO ORDERED. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. PULLED BY KM - NEED TO CALENDAR BUDGET WORKSHOP HEARINGS AND A HEARING TO ADOPT THE BUDGET. MOTION KM/SE TO RECEIVE & FILE. SO ORDERED. (d) (e) Recommendation to receive and file the March, 1992 in- vestment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary Brutsch dated April 8, 1992. Recommendation to adopt resolution adding City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin to the list of authorized personnel eligible to utilize the City's Visa card. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 1, 1992. - 2 - ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 92-5530. (f) Recommendation to approve a transfer of funds in the amount of $40,000 from the Retirement Account ($24,000) and the Employee Benefit Account ($16,000) to the City Attorney Account for Contract Services. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated April 6, 1992. PULLED BY KM - MOTION SE/AW TO APPROVE TRANSFER OF FUNDS. OK 4-1 (KM -NO). (g) Recommendation to adopt a resolution of intent to study changing the standard conditions contained in Section 10-8 for off -sale alcohol beverage establishments. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 7, 1992. PULLED BY SE - MOTION SE/RB TO ADOPT RESOLUTION OF INTENT NO. 92-5532 WITH AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE SECION 10-7. SO ORDERED. (h) Recommendation to approve request from Kiwanis Club to use the Community Center lawn to sell Christmas trees in 1992. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 6, 1992. PULLED BY KM - MOTION KM/RB TO APPROVE REQUEST WITH A CAVEAT ON PERMISSION TO HAVE KIWANIS INVITE OTHER NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS TO PARTICI- PATE. OK 3-2 (RE/SE-NO). (i) Recommendation to amend previously approved request from the Women's Professional Volleyball Association to amend June 13-14 contract. Memorandum from Community Resour- ces Director Mary Rooney dated April 1, 1992. PULLED BY SE - MOTION SE/KM - TO AGREE TO CHANGE AGREEMENT, HOWEVER KEEP NAME AS "HERMOSA OPEN". OK 4-1 (AW -NO). SHIRLEY CASSELL - SPOKE IN OPPOSITION. (j) Recommendation to approve a one-year extension of main- tenance contract for services on the City owned tele- phone telephone switching and key equipment. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated February 6, 1992. PULLED BY KM - MOTION KM/SE - TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION NO. 1 AND, UNDER RECOMMENDATION NO. 2 TO CONTINUE SUPPORTING A NEW TELEPHONE SYS- TEM WHICH DOES NOT INCLUDE VOICE MAIL OR AUTOMATED ATTENDANT. SO ORDERED. (k) Recommendation to adopt resolution with findings for denial of project at 2902 Hermosa Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 7, 1992. PULLED BY AW - CITY ATTORNEY RECOMMENDED A MODIFICATION TO RESOLUTION SECTION 1 PARAGRAPH 3 TO READ "THE PROJECT EXCEEDS PERMISSABLE LOT COVERAGE AS REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 606 AND 229.1 OF THE ZONING CODE." MOTION AW/KM - TO HAVE A NEW PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS. MOTION FAILS 2-3 (RB/RE/SE). JOHN FELLOWS, RUTAN & TUCKER - WOULD LIKE TAPES HELD FROM MARCH 24 AND THIS MEETING UNTIL HE CAN HAVE COPIES MADE. MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 92-5533 WITH CHANGE TO FINDING NO. 3 IN SECTION 1. (KM/AW-NO) (1) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #21279 for a two -unit condominium located at 1038 Seventh Street. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 6, 1992. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 92-5531. (m) Recommendation to approve request for 30 -day extension of temporary appointment for the Acting General Services Director. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 6, 1992. PULLED BY AW - MOTION KM/RB - TO APPROVE STAFF REC. OK 4-1 (AW -NO) (n) Recommendation to adopt a resolution of intent to ini- tiate a text amendment requiring activated carbon ab- sorption filtration systems for certain odor producing businesses and, by minute order, authorize Planning Department and Fire Department staff to attend odor in- spection training sessions conducted by AQMD. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 6, 1992. PULLED BY SE - MOTION RB/SE TO RECEIVE AND FILE. OK 5-0. (o) Recommendation to receive and file report on removal of hazardous materials from building at Clark Field. Memo- randum from Deputy City Engineer Lynn Terry dated April 8, 1992. PULLED BY KM - MOTION KM/RB TO RECEIVE AND FILE. SO ORDERED. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. - 4 - 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS/LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) Letter from Daniel & Roberta Kain, 1947 Valley Drive, dated March 20, 1992, regarding block wall construction on their property. Memorandum from Building Director William Grove dated April 7, 1992. MOTION RE/KM TO RECEIVE AND FILE. SO ORDERED. (b) Letter from Hermosa Beach Little League dated March 26, 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. Letter from Friends of the Library dated March 28, 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. Letter from City Treasurer Gary Brutsch dated March 30, 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. Letters from Gary W. Brown, 222-1/2 26th St., and Seth Brinks -Brown, 222-1/2 26th St., dated April 2, 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. Letter from Shea McCurdy, 1113 Valley Drive, dated April 4, 1992 re. Greenbelt parking. Letter from Myron and Patricia Gazin, dated April 7, 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. THESE LETTERS 4(b) THROUGH 4(g) WERE COMBINED WITH ITEM 12(a). PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) TO BRING INTO CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRI- ATE BY THE CITY COUNCIL, AND ADOPTION OF A ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 598 FIRST STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 7, 1992. MOTION SE TO SEND BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO TAKE APPROPRIATE STEPS TO TAKE THIS AREA AND PLACE IN SPA 4. NO SECOND. MOTION AW/KM TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE. VOTE: 2-3 (RB/RE/SE-NO), MOTION FAILS. MOTION SE/RE - TO DIRECT P.C. TO STUDY INCORPORATING WITH SPA 4 WHICH WOULD ONLY ALLOW 2 UNITS. VOTE: 3-2 (KM/AW-NO). 5 MOTION SE/RB TO CONTINUE THIS HEARING TO MAY MEETING TO COME BACK WITH RECOMMENDATION FROM PLANNING COMMISSION. SO ORDERED. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. STAFF RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PAY PHONES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. Supplemental memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated April 7, 1992. (Continued from March 24, 1992 meeting.) MOTION RB/TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. NO SECOND. RE SAID REPORT IS DIFFICULT TO FOLLOW - NOT WELL ORGANIZED. DIRECTION FROM MAYOR TO CONTINUE TO APRIL 28 MEETING. 7. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF AGREEMENT FOR INSPECTION AND CON- TRACT ADMINISTRATION, SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION, CIP 88-406. Memorandum from Public Works Director Carl Ma- lone dated March 13, 1992. (Continued from March 24, 1992 meeting.) CONTINUE TO NEXT MEETING. 8. PROPOSED RECONFIGURATION OF PARKING LOT "E". Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated April 6, 1992. MOTION RE/RB - TO PUT TOGETHER A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COUNCIL TO MEET WITH THE BUSINESSES AND COME BACK WITH A RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL. BENZ/EDGERTON TO BE THE SUBCOMMITTEE. COME BACK TO COUNCIL IN TWO WEEKS. OK 4-1 (KM -NO) 9. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE CONTRACT FOR "FLEET FEET TRI- ATHLETE" TO SPONSOR A SPRINT TRIATHLON SUNDAY, OCTOBER 18, 1992. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1992. MOTION KM/RB TO APPROVE STAFF REC. OK 4-1 (AW -NO). 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Request of Vehicle Parking District Board to be included in joint workshop meeting with the City Council, Plan- ning Commission and the Chamber of Commerce on May 14, 1992. (Held over from March 24, 1992 meeting for dis- cussion by full Council re. bifurcating meeting.) MOTION SE/RE - MAY 14 WORKSHOP MTG. IS TO BE AS ORIGINALLY PLANNED. (COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION & CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. OK 5-0. - 6 - MOTION SE/TO MEET WITH VPD, PROBABLY IN JULY. STAFF TO COME BACK WITH DATE ACCEPTABLE TO VPD. (b) Report re. initiative petition to create and designate the Biltmore Site as Open Space O -S-2 for its preserva- tion and use as a public park. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April 6, 1992. MOTION KM TO RECEIVE AND FILE. SO ORDERED. 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. Request by Councilmember Edgerton for motion to properly notice hearing on elimination and/or revision of Green- belt parking plan. MOTION KM/RB TO SET THIS ITEM FOR HEARING FOR RECONSIDERATION AND WOULD LIKE CERTAIN INFORMATION INCLUDED THAT WAS MISSING FROM 3/ 24 MTG. (1) STATUS OF PARKING AT VONS AND ARE THERE REVERSIONARY RIGHTS, (2) COASTAL COMMISSION CONCERNS. MOTION SE/RB TO BRING BACK FOR A HEARING THE FIRST MEETING IN MAY (MAY 12). VOTE: OK 3-2 (KM/RE-NO). MOTION SE/KM - TO VACATE ENFORCEMENT UNTIL THE PUBLIC HEARING, BUT STAFF ENFORCE THE 12 HOUR PARKING LIMIT. MOTION FAILS 2-3 (RB/RE/AW-NO) (b) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for clarification or possible amendment, if necessary, to Section 1430 and Section 1432-C (1) of the Zoning Code dealing with com- patibility of a condominium project with the surrounding neighborhood. CONTINUE TO 4/28 MTG. (c) Request by Councilmember Edgerton to give the Planning Commission members a complete copy of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. MOTION SE TO GIVE P.C. MUNICIPAL CODES. NO SECOND. IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES PLANNING COMMISSIONERS WITH COPIES OF THE ZONING CODE. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. - 7 - JUNE WILLIAMS - OBJECTED TO COUNCIL COMMENTS RE. WRITTEN COM- MUNICATIONS. REQUESTED CLARIFICATION. RE - WOULD LIKE AN ITEM ON NEXT AGENDA TO CLARIFY WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. SHIRLEY CASSELL - SERGEANT AT ARMS TO BE IN ATTENDANCE AT COUNCIL MEETINGS. ADJOURNMENT AT 12:14 A.M. /2. 77/.5 /5� 9�-- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, March 24, 1992, at the hour of 7:42 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - The closed session was held at 7:07 P.M. regard- ing matters of litigation, Boccato vs City of Hermosa Beach: pur- suant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a); and matters of Per- sonnel. The closed session was recessed at 7:33 P.M. to the regular scheduled public meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Robert Benz,:Councilmember ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Wiemans, Mayor Pro Tempore Essertier Absent: Mayor Midstokke ANNOUNCEMENTS - Mayor Pro Tempore Essertier introduced Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager designee, who was attending the meeting as part of the audience, prior to assuming the position of City Manager on April 20, 1992. PRESENTATION TO SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC OF PROCEEDS FROM THE 40TH ANNUAL SAND AND STRAND RACE: Mayor Pro Tempore Essertier presented a check to Jack Mott of the South Bay Free Clinic in the amount of $1,075, which represented one half of the proceeds of the annual Sand and Strand Race, co- sponsored by the City. Mr. Mott thanked the City; noted that the South Bay Free Clinic had served over 1,400 residents of Hermosa Beach last year; and, announced that he had tickets to the gour- met food tasting, to be held on April 26, 1992, as the major fund raiser for the South Bay Free Clinic. PROCLAMATION: Medal of Valor Week, April 5 - 11, 1992 Mayor Pro Tempore Essertier presented to B. J. Conte, Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, a proclamation declaring the period of April 5 through April 11, 1992 as Medal of Valor Week to commemo- rate the heroism and self-sacrifice of past and present recipients of this prestigious commendation that seeks to credit safety personnel for heroic acts which so often have in the past gone unheralded; and to honor all South Bay Police and Fire- fighters for their service to our communities. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Robert Udovich - owner of Brooklyn Brick Oven Pizza, presented a petition directly to indi- vidual Councilmembers requesting the dismissal of the Planning Director; Martin Moreno - 1326 Corona Street, requested more information on item 1(f); Garrison Frost - 2900 Tennyson, spoke on the death City Council Minutes 03-24-92 Page 7740 IN of a young man due to the inhalation of nitrous oxide; requested that more information be dis- seminated to the public regarding the dangers of this drug; Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., submitted infor- mation directly to individual Councilmembers; stated that a three videocamera system could be purchased for $6,000; stated that cable TV rates had increased 117% in the last five years; stated that in contract with the City, rate increases were tied to 75% of the Consumer Price Index; Cathy McCurdy - Hermosa Beach School Board, invited Council to annual P.T.O. breakfast and tour of the campus at the Valley School this week; and, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, concerned with item 1(i); stated it was an on-going problem, and although it would take money to solve the problem, it was worth it. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (s), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3 but are listed in order for clarity: (a)-part(1) Edgerton, (f) Benz, and (i) Edgerton. Motion Wiemans, second Edgerton. So ordered. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. The order of the agenda was suspended at 7:59 P.M. to the public hearings, starting with Item No. 5. (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on February 25, 1992 (Continued from 3/10/92 mtg.). Supplemental memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 17, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, objected to minutes amendment format. Action: To approve, after further amendment, the mi- nutes of the regular meeting of February 25, 1992, to include a third proposed action for item 8, page 7720, to -read: ',Proposed Action: To adopt staff recommenda- tion. Motion Edgerton. The motion failed due to the City Council Minutes 03-24-92 Page 7741 (b) lack of a second." Motion Edgerton, second Wiemans. So ordered. 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on March 10, 1992. Action: To approve the minutes of March 10, 1992 as presented. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants No. 40093, Nos. 40170 through 40251 inclusive, and Nos. 40253 through 40318 inclusive; noting voided warrants Nos. 40171, 40172, 40206, 40207, 40209, 40253, and 40254. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the February, 1992 financial reports: 1) Revenue and Expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's Report. Action: To receive and file the February, 1992 finan- cial reports as presented. (e) Recommendation to receive and file report on Management audits. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated March 17, 1992. (f) Action: To receive and file the report on Management audits as presented. Recommendation to receive and file report on the Nation- al Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit status. Memorandum from Public Works Director Carl Ma- lone dated March 9, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. Deputy City Engineer Terry responded to Council questions. Action: To receive and file. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. So ordered. City Council Minutes 03-24-92 Page 7742 (g) (h) (i) Recommendation to receive and file status report on Of- fice of Traffic Safety approval. Memorandum from Public Works Director Carl Malone dated March 17, 1992. Action: To receive and file the report on the status of grant funding in the amount of $40,000 to conduct a high accident identification and surveillance study; a neigh- borhood intrusion study; and, a traffic circulation study to include mitigation measures to reduce user con- flict on the Strand, now awaiting final approval by the Office of Traffic Safety. Recommendation to receive and file report from Vehicle Parking District Board of Parking Place Commissioners regarding accomplishments. Memorandum from Acting General Service Director Henry L. Staten dated March 5, 1992. Action: To receive and file the report from the Vehicle Parking District Board of Parking Place Commissioners showing four completed goals including: revenue increase and contract extension with Allright Parking, motorcycle lot options, and review of validation stamps; four in progress goals including: participation with R/UDAT, improve lot cleaning and trash maintenance, and policy review of issuing permits to organizations for major events in the downtown area; and seven pending goals including: consideration of extension of boundaries, parking structure, trash enclosure design and funding, time limits, and on-site and off-site parking for businesses-. Recommendation re. report on surveying discrepancies and existing procedure for protecting survey monuments along Monterey Boulevard and Bayview Drive between 16th and 19th Streets. Memorandum from Public Works Director Carl Malone dated March 10, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Dr. Laurel Roberts - 1656 Bayview Drive, requested the Council not act on this item tonight as there are factual errors in the report; and, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, requested that Dr. Roberts be given an appointment with the new City Manager to resolve this matter and that the item be held over until he arrives. Proposed Action: To receive and file. Motion Edgerton. The motion was withdrawn. City Council Minutes 03-24-92 Page 7743 Action: To continue this item to the second meeting in May: the regular City Council meeting of May 26, 1992. Motion Wiemans, second Benz. So ordered. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1(a-1), (f), and (i) were heard at this time, but are shown in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A CON- DITIONAL USE PERMIT, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #20554, AND A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 2902 HERMOSA AVENUE. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 17, 1992. Supplemental letter from Jeffrey M. Oderman, Attorney at Law, 611 Anton Blvd., St.# 1400, Costa Mesa, representing the property owners, dated March 24, 1992. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing was opened at 8:03 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, questioned if Councilmember Benz had a conflict of interest due to living within the 300 foot radius notification area. City Attorney Vose responded that if Councilmember Benz was a month by month lessee, he would not be considered to have a con- flict in this matter; and if he carried a petition against the project prior to assuming office, that act was not sufficient to establish bias. Vivian Hoffman - 3002 Hermosa Avenue, appellant, objected to the 35 foot height; stated that the neighborhood did not want overdevelopment and felt this project was not in the best interests of the area; in support of the appeal; Sheila Donahue Miller - 2922 Hermosa Avenue proper- ty owner, questioned the City Attorney's opinion; stated it was too late to lower the height limit as many properties had already built to 35 feet; the neighborhood was not R-1; the project would be an attractive addition; in City Council Minutes 03-24-92 Page 7744 support of the project; Chris Coppersmith - 3133 The Strand, opposed to arbitrary decisions on property owner's rights; in support of the project Steve Downing - 3129 The Strand, feels the City should obey the existing laws; stated the codes changed five times while his home was being built; in support of the project; Chuck Simmons - 218 Longfellow, stated the Council should make changes legally by amending the code; in support of the project; Elizabeth Srour - 820 Manhattan Avenue, Manhattan Beach, representing the owners, displayed a rendering of the project; submitted information and photos directly to individual Councilmem- bers; explained the chronology of the project; explained the project and stated that it met or exceeded all code requirements; in support of the project; Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, spoke in favor of lowering the height limit to 30 feet; con- sidered the project a lot split as the Con- dominiums would have two owners; in support of the appeal; Patty Chiappetta - 133 29th Street, stated there was nothing that looks like this in the neigh- borhood now; feels this project does not fit in the area; in support of the appeal; Larry Sartorius - 446 Monterey Blvd., spoke in favor of Condominiums as they afforded new home buyers their least expensive chance to own property; objected to "condo bashing"; in sup- port of the project; Viva Stroyke - 3205 The Strand, spoke in support of the project; Darryl Hughes - 127 29th Street, stated he lived behind the project and would lose his view; believed everyone entitled to keep a view; in support of the appeal; Don Falkenstien - 3010 Hermosa Avenue, objects to project; in support of the appeal; Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, spoke in favor of property rights; in support of the project; Bob Stroyke - 3205 The Strand, requested Council to deny the appeal; in support of the project; Carol Simmons - 218 Longfellow, suggested that the Council separate this project from the overall question of height limits and approve the proj- ect if it meets the code, then look at height limits for the entire zone; in support of the project; Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, objected to early polling of audience; felt Councilmember Benz should have stepped down; stated there was no view Ordinance in the City; the project City Council Minutes 03-24-92 Page 7745 should have the right to build to the same height as neighboring buildings; in support of the project; Jack Andren - 521 Gentry Street, asked that this two -unit town house not be confused with the larger issue of height limitations from 35 to 30 feet in R-3; the zoning, height, and density for the area was established long ago and gives everyone the right to build to 35 feet; proper- ty owner should have some assurance of use rights; in support of the project; Doug Clark - property owner, stated he was not a "developer" as this was to be his home and the only project he had ever tried to build; proj- ect met or exceeded all current codes; in sup- port of the project; and, Vivian Hoffman - 3002 Hermosa Avenue, appellant, stated she had bought a fourplex, which was now virtually a single family residence due to downzoning; need to stop overdevelopment in the area; it had cost local citizens money to bring this appeal and requested the money be returned. The -,public hearing was closed at 9:12 P.M. Proposed Action: To uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the appeal. Motion Wiemans. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Proposed Action: To approve the C.U.P., Tentative Par- cel Map, Precise Development Plan subject to restriction of a 30 foot height limit and direct staff to bring back restrictions making necessary findings that the project, as proposed, is not compatible with the neighborhood. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Wiemans and Mayor Pro Tempore Essertier, which caused a two -two tie vote due to the absence of Mayor Midstokke. Action: To deny the project without prejudice and refer to staff to bring back a Resolution consistent with the Council concerns regarding height and lot coverage. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the objection of Wiemans and the absence of Mayor Midstokke. The meeting recessed at 9:45 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 10:02 P.M. 6. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY A PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW DELIVERY SERVICE IN CONJUNCTION WITH ROUND TABLE PIZZA IN VONS MARKET AT 715 PIER AVENUE, PLAZA HERMOSA. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael City Council Minutes 03-24-92 Page 7746 Schubach dated March 16, 1992. Supplemental letter, with enclosures, from Terry Salpeter of Round Table Piz- za, dated March 21, 1992. Greg Peters, representing Vons appeal, requested a postponement if the Councilmembers had not had the opportunity to review the material that had been sent to them by Round Table Pizza. The consensus of the Council was to hear the item at this time. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing was opened at 10:12 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Greg Peters - Senior Real Estate Representative of the Von's Companies, Inc., appellant, intro- duced speakers for the appeal; David Lungren - 660 Hillary Drive, Tiburon, rep- resenting Round Table Pizza, discussed the chronology of the issue; felt that the delivery service had been fully disclosed to the City; felt that Round Table Pizza was in compliance with City requirements; Courtney Rink - J. and B. Property representative, stated that as the owners of the property they approved of the consolidated parking plan as presented; Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, representing the Planning Commission, stated the Planning Commission felt that parking was a problem; Robert Udovich - Brooklyn Brick Oven Pizza, stated the top entrance to the lower parking lot was locked many times last year, so would not al- ways be available for employee parking; ques- tioned the accuracy of the parking survey done by Vons; Diana Udovich - Brooklyn Brick Oven Pizza, ques- tioned the length of time the issue has taken; requested Round Table Pizza delivery service be stopped; Liz Mansker - Toucan Tan salon owner, Hermosa Plaza, stated there was a parking problem; questioned if an EIR had been taken for Round Table Pizza; stated J. and B. Property had promised there would be no competing businesses in the shopping center; Peter Ellis - 1100 Monterey Blvd., questioned the effectiveness of parking enforcement within the center; stated delivery trucks were a safety hazard; presented a note from Larry Sartorius directly to the Council; -- Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., stated the theatre parking at the Pavilion impacted the area near Brooklyn Brick Oven Pizza, as many City Council Minutes 03-24-92 Page 7747 people preferred to park in an open lot rather than a parking. structure; Robert Udovich - Brooklyn Brick Oven Pizza, requested answers to his questions; and, Jack Hawkins - Vice President of Vons Companies, Inc., stated that Vons would pay for the restriping of the parking lot; and the City should allow the market place to dictate the question of competition. The public hearing was closed at 10:37 P.M. City Attorney Vose stated that a business license did not vali- date a zoning use or a building use. Action: To deny the appeal, sustain the Planning Com- mission decision, and adopt Resolution No. 92-5529, en- titled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO SUSTAIN THE PLANNING COM- MISSION DECISION TO DENY A PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW PARKING REQUIREMENTS TO BE CALCULATED PURSUANT TO SECTION 1170 THEREBY DENYING THE REQUEST TO ALLOW DELIVERY FROM A PIZZA RESTAURANT ("ROUND TABLE PIZZA") INSIDE A GROCERY MARKET ("VONS") AT 715 PIER AVENUE IN THE PLAZA HERMOSA . SHOPPING CENTER." Motion Wiemans, second Edgerton. The motion carried unanimously, noting the absence of Mayor Midstokke. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. REVIEW OF REVISED CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS FOR THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT, CIP 91-511. Memorandum from Public Works Director Carl Malone dated March 18, 1992. Supplemental letter from Jim Lissner, 2715 El Oeste Drive, dated March 22, 1992. Deputy City Engineer Terry presented the staff report, described the five renderings, and responded to Council questions. Planning Director Schubach responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, responded to Council questions regarding the Planning Com- mission recommendations; Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, questioned why the lower parking level at Hermosa Plaza was not signed as public parking; objected to park- ing on the Greenbelt; Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, questioned noticing of the Greenbelt; considered Coastal Commission issue a ruse; objected to parking on the Greenbelt; and, City Council Minutes 03-24-92 Page 7748 Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, objected to parking on the Greenbelt. Proposed Action: To sign the lot below Vons as public parking. Motion Benz. The motion was withdrawn. Proposed Action: To send the matter back to staff to bring back before the Council as no parking except in front of Clark Stadium. Motion Benz. The motion was withdrawn. Action: To restrict parking on the Greenbelt except for existing parking across from Clark Stadium; and request staff to move the signs restricting parking hours and oversized vehicles to the parking garage in the lower level of Plaza Hermosa Shopping Center. Motion Benz, second Mayor Pro Tempore Essertier. The motion carried unanimously, noting the absence of Mayor Midstokke. Proposed Action: To return to staff to start reviewing a landscape plan for the area. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion was withdrawn when Community Resources Director Rooney stated there would be no problem with a landscape design. 8. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF AGREEMENT FOR INSPECTION AND CON- TRACT ADMINISTRATION, SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION, CIP 88-406. Memorandum from Public Works Director Carl Ma- lone dated March 13, 1992. Action: To continue this item to the meeting of April 14, 1992. Motion Mayor Pro Tempore Essertier, second Benz. So ordered. The meeting recessed at 11:21 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 11:30 P.M. At 11:30 P.M. the order of the agenda was moved to item 12(a). 9. MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION FEE ASSESSMENTS FOR TRANSPOR- TATION/AIR QUALITY RELATED ACTIVITIES OF LOCAL GOVERN- MENT (ASSEMBLY BILL 2766), with ordinance for introduc- tion. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 17, 1992. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 92-1066. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion carried unani- mously, noting the absence of Mayor Midstokke. City Council Minutes 03-24-92 Page 7749 Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 92-1066, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION REDUCTION ORDINANCE." Motion Benz, second Edgerton. AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Wiemans, Mayor Pro Tempore Essertier NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Midstokke 10. REPORT REGARDING PAYPHONES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated March 11, 1992. Acting General Services Director Staten presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Shelly Garelik - Regional Sales Manager, GTE, stated that he knew of no agreement, formal or informal, that would allow General Telephone to upgrade the City's phone system Action: To continue this item in order to allow staff to return to General Telephone to discuss better condi- tions for the City regarding an updated phone system. Motion Mayor Pro Tempore Essertier, second Benz. So ordered. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - None 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Appointments to Hermosa Beach Cable Television Advisory Board. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dat- ed March 19, 1992. (Continued from March 10, 1992 meeting.) Coming forward to address the Council on this item was : Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, suggested that all applicants be appointed. Action: To appoint five Board members from among the applicants as follows: 1) David Acosta Motion Wiemans, second Edgerton. No objections; 2) Rick Learned Motion Edgerton, second Wiemans. No objections; 3) Dave Reimer Motion Benz, second Edgerton. Wiemans objects; 4) Scott Tollefsen Motion Mayor Pro Tempore Essertier, second Wiemans. No objections; and, City Council Minutes 03-24-92 Page 7750 5) Gerry Schweitzer Motion Wiemans, second Edgerton. Benz objects. at 11:35 P.M. the order of the agenda was returned to item 3. (b) Request by Vehicle Parking District Board to be included in joint workshop meeting with the City Council, Plan- ning Commission and the Chamber of Commerce on May 14, 1992. Memorandum from Henry Staten, Acting Director of General Services dated March 4, 1992. (Continued from March 10, 1992 meeting.) (c) Action: Mayor Pro Tempore Essertier directed that this item be continued to the meeting of April 14, 1992, when Mayor Midstokke would be present to consider bifurcating the meeting; and stated that it was the consensus of the Council to meet with the Vehicle Parking District Board, but preferred to meet with the members separately as the meetings were getting too large. Request for waiver of the automatic vacancy resulting from absences by Planning Commissioner Steven Suard. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 18, 1992. Action: To waive the vacancy. Motion Edgerton, second Wiemans. So ordered. 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request from Mayor Midstokke for discussion of concern regarding regularly scheduled Vehicle Parking District meetings and compliance with open meeting laws and City policies. Action: Mayor Pro Tempore Essertier directed, with the consensus of the Council, to continue this item to the meeting of April 14, 1992, to allow Mayor Midstokke to be present. (b) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for discussion of a review of Boccato's conditional use permit. There was no objection from the Council to hear this item. Action: To direct staff to draft a Resolution of Intent for the meeting of April 14, 1992, to have the Planning Commission study changing the standard conditions in Section 10-8 of the Code as it relates to off -sale al- cohol beverage establishments, specifically items No. 9, 10, 12, 14, and 15. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried, City Council Minutes 03-24-92 Page 7751 noting the objection of Wiemans and the absence of Mayor Midstokke. CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, objected to the minutes amendment format; lack of painted crosses and tees for parking spaces; and re- quested monitoring of traffic on residential streets to be paid by Caltrans; and, Robert Udovich - Brooklyn Brick Oven Pizza, questioned when the enforcement of the ban on pizza delivery service by Round Table Pizza would begin. City Attorney Vose stated that if the City enforces the restric- tion of delivery service, Vons could go to court and ask for a restraining order. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, March 25, 1992, at the hour of 12:17 A.M. to the Special Meeting to be held on Tuesday, March 31, 1992 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 03-24-92 Page 7752 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Heriuosa Beach, California, held on Thursday, March 26, 1992, at the hour of 7:09 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager ROLL CALL Present: Edgerton, Wiemans, Mayor Pro Tempore Essertier Absent: Benz, Mayor Midstokke ALSO IN ATTENDANCE HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES: Vicki Garcia, Gregory Kelsey, Cathy McCurdy, Mary Lou Weiss and School Superintendent Elaine Gourley. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION: Joseph Di Monda, Robert B. Marks, Rod Merl, Steven Suard and Planning Director Michael Schubach. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION: Steven Crecy, Richard H. McCurdy, Julius (J.R.) Reviczky and Community Resources Director Mary Rooney. Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski. The City Council meeting adjourned to a joint workshop meeting with the School Board, Planning Commission, and Parks and Recre- ation Commission. TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION: 1. Use of the Greenbelt as Garden or Nature Study Area. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and referred to mounted conceptual designs for the planting on the Greenbelt. Director Rooney stated that there was no monetary commitment required of the City, just City support; the drought resistant plantings at the school were funded by the West Basin Water Dis- trict and other organizations and Corporations; and the ReLeaf fund currently had $2,000, plus additional money pledged. School Superintendent Gourley announced there would be ground breaking in May to begin the planting project in front of the school; and, there was to be replanting of the sandhill behind the school to encourage native plants, birds and butterflies. -Concerns were expressed by both the School Trustees and the Parks and Recreation Commission members due to the City Council Minutes 03-26-92 Page 7753 a (a) Council voting to restrict parking on the Greenbelt. They all stated the loss of parking presented a hardship for youth activities, in particular to organized Little League and Soccer games scheduled for the Clark Field area, and requested the Council reconsider its action. 2. Traffic Circulation Adjacent to Schools. A memorandum from Public Works Director Carl Malone was presented which provided an update on the traffic light progress for the School Crossing at Valley Drive. Di- rector Malone projected that, weather permitting, the pedestrian activated light will be installed by mid April. General discussion ensued pertaining to traffic entrance and egress at the school; the problems of safely drop- ping children off at school; the problems of making a left turn onto Valley Drive from the school parking lot; and the possibility of a safe bike route for the chil- dren. The possibility of paving part of the Greenbelt with a hard cinder paving was generally dismissed due to concerns that it would become a race path for distance or speed training bicyclists, thereby creating an even greater danger to pedestrians or children on bicycles. Also, a ramp down from the Greenbelt at the school was considered dangerous, due to the elevation differences. 3. South School Site. Director Rooney showed two renderings of possible space use for the South School site and asked direction of those assembled. Discussion centered on the question of active versus passive park use; it was suggested there was no need for "sand" volleyball courts as they were available on the beach; it was suggested that available parking dictate active uses; and it was the consensus that it be a "balanced" park. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: School Superintendent Gourley suggested the City sponsor a youth essay contest to ask the children for their ideas on what could be done on the South School Park. School Trustee Weiss suggested the City initiate a "Youth Council", modeled on the Youth Council in Tor- rance, that would require City support, not money. Parks and Recreation Commissioner Crecy, responding to a Planning Commissioner's question, stated that the recom- mendation for trimming the oleander on the Greenbelt was a safety measure to allow the area to be visible from the street. City Council Minutes 03-26-92 Page 7754 CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council on these items were: Frances Parker - 521 1/2 Loma Drive, stated there was a 10 foot strip of land behind her property and behind her neighbor's property at 517 Loma Drive that was owned by the City; she said they had been maintaining the property for a number of years and would like to purchase it from the City if they could; and, Betty Martin - 257 27th Street, questioned the closing of the Greenbelt for parking across from City Hall and asked why the Council had done it so suddenly as it had caused great hardship and confusion among volunteers at City Hall and patrons and staff at the Library; stated that many patrons at the library were mothers with young children or elderly people who found it very difficult to walk several blocks or to cross Pier Avenue; questioned if the library had been informed of the Council's intent to close the Greenbelt to parking. r ADJOURNMENT - The Special Workshop Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Thursday, March 26, 1992, at the hour of 8:57 P.M. to the Special Meeting to be held on Tuesday, March 31, 1992 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. 1 I 0 G 1`lL: /LS Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 03-26-92 Page 7755 oL, MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, March 31, 1992, at the hour of 7:06 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Frederick Ferrin, City Manager designee ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Wiemans, Mayor Midstokke Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS - Mayor Midstokke announced the attendance at this evening's meeting by Frederick Ferrin, the newly appointed City Manager, effective April 20, 1992, and welcomed him. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION - None 1. CONSENT CALENDAR (a) ORDINANCE NO. 92-1066 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION REDUCTION ORDINANCE. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 92-1066. Motion Essertier, second Wiemans. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Mayor Midstokke. Mayor Midstokke requested that the staff report be corrected to reflect her absence rather than abstention from the vote on the introduction of this ordinance at the meeting of March 24, 1992. 2. DISCUSSION OF ALTERNATIVES AND METHODS TO ACCOMPLISH A REDUCTION IN OPERATING COSTS FOR PROVIDING POLICE, PARK- ING ENFORCEMENT, AND ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES. Report from Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated March 26, 1992. Interim City Manager Wisniewski presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Personnel Director Robert Blackwood and Finance Director Viki Copeland also responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Mike Flaherty - 408 - 31st Street, 20 -year employee, speaking as Teamster representative tonight, said he served on the 10 -member study committee and that there was no consensus on the recommendations presented this evening by the City Manager; expressed opposition to the proposed reorganization of the General Services Department and the reduction of officers; said eliminating revenue-producing employees makes no sense; suggested a two -to -three year program to resolve City Council Minutes 03-31-92 Page 7756 11 (3) the problem through attrition; suggested a $157,000 savings by eliminating the General Services director, keeping the coordinator, decreasing supervisors by one, decreasing the officers to eight, keeping three technical aides, and eliminating the clerk typist position; Sgt. Wally Moore - H.B. Police Officers Association president, objected to the direction by Council to trim 10 percent from the police budget, as public safety should be the last place trimmed; said crime trends are increasing countywide; disputed the amount of savings presented in the staff report if the recommendations were implemented; said if reductions are needed, they should be citywide; and suggested involving line people to work with the new City Manager to resolve the budget problem; Michael Hannon - attorney for the H.B. Police Officers Association, said the report contained no analysis of police level of service; there would be no net savings due to litigation costs; and that meet and confer should occur first, before the matter comes before Council, otherwise it is reduced to a ritual dance; Edie Webber - referred to a 6/4/87 staff memo concerning withdrawal from RCC; said costs have gone up and the City lacks the capabilities it had under RCC; there are not enough dispatchers; there has been a reduction from 42 officers when she was on Council to 36 officers now; suggested citywide budget reductions; and suggested cutting expenditures by 5 percent and increasing revenue by 5 percent to attain a 10 percent reduction; Mike Lacey - Comedy and Magic Club, complimented the police on their performance and quick response time; stressed importance of maintaining safety in the downtown area; said gang activity is not a problem because the police respond immediately; and suggested the use of public relations; Val Strasser - Acting Police Chief, with 18 years of service with the City, said predatory criminals coming into the South Bay area committing robberies and burglaries due to the recession are being picked up by the police; did not understand why police should be cut by 10 percent; said savings can be achieved through attrition; and suggested the involvement of line people; Florence Kahn - Fourth Street, opposed reductions to the Police Department and cutting back on safety; said this was not the time to reduce impact on crime, narcotics and law enforcement; suggested finding additional sources of revenue and looking at ways to generate more income; Kevin Murphy - Avante Jewelry, opposed the proposed cuts; suggested cutting management, not officers; expressed concern about problems on Pier Avenue; City Council Minutes 03-31-92 Page 7757 and said officers are doing a good job; Steve Endom - member, H.B. Police Officers Association, introduced Officers Tanabe, Hatano, Cochran, three of the four officers with the least seniority (the fourth officer was on duty and not present), noting that they represented some of the best employees; Dallas Yost - Pacific Screen, said his business depended on the presence of police officers, since visitors in the downtown area like safety when walking down the street; Gene Dreher - Hermosa Beach, cited this as an example of failed management; said the City should look to the future; and suggested improved information systems; Garrison Frost - Coast Drugs, resident and landowner, said cities exist to provide safety to citizens; opposed to budget cuts in Police Department; June Williams - Hermosa Beach, did not favor reducing police officers, but said recommendation is not to do that, rather for Council to review alternatives; pointed out that Council directed the Police Chief to come back with proposals to cut the budget, which is what he did; John Bowler - 833 Hermosa Avenue, owner of Fat Face Fenners Faloon, president of the Hermosa Beach Restaurant and Tavern Association, addressed quality of service; expressed concern about discontinuing downtown and Strand patrol; cited decrease in revenues, and said the City cannot bring in more revenue by decreasing safety and service; Mike Franzel - 15 - 15th Street, said public safety is his number one concern; suggested selling Community Center; Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, said there was a lack of quick service under RCC and hoped the Police Department gets the equipment it needs; said there were several places to cut the budget besides personnel; suggested cutting the City Attorney and Prosecutor budgets, Planning Department, employee benefits, and cutting down on staff until the Community Center becomes cost effective; Jim Howsley - 947 Seventh Street, said the Police Department has been understaffed and therefore pays more in overtime; opposed to cutting police officers; and Leroy Staten - Acting General Services Director, commended the General Services staff for their hard work; noted that because of the type of business they perform, citizens would be unlikely to speak up on their behalf as they do for the police; said it is a valuable department that has produced a lot of revenue over the years. The meeting recessed at 9:30 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:50 P.M. City Council Minutes 03-31-92 Page 7758 Jim Rosenberger - Bayview Drive, offered an historical perspective on the change from RCC, noting he served on the RCC Board following his election; said the system was antiquated; that there was no assured percentage increase each year and the City could not gage costs; said the City would be forced into a several year, long-term commitment in RCC with no set cost; that the City could control costs better if the system was in-house; said Council held public hearing and voted unanimously to have its own system; Lynn Thompson - 1015 Prospect, opposed cutting police officers; suggested involving new City Manager in the process, and perhaps a public task force; John French - First Place, opposed to suggested cuts; suggested cutting out volleyball tournaments and the street fair that occurs twice a year; and Sheryl Falcon - employee for police and fire dispatch, said response time under RCC was a problem, but with in-house system, they can respond within seconds; said response time plays a big role in apprehending suspects; said the dispatch center was very important to the safety of citizens; said the City would be fighting for air time if sharing with other cities. Action: To reject the proposed change in personnel as presented in tonight's report; assign responsibility for this project to the new City Manager at his first meeting on April 28, 1992; to reconstitute a task force or whatever the City Manager recommends involving line people from all departments; to look at adjustments in all departments; to address the total $1 million deficit that the City is facing; to look at a long-term, two -to - three year plan for eliminating staff positions through attrition (i.e., retirement); to do an audit addressing where costs are escalating; to do a complete audit of tickets -- revenue versus processing and collection costs; and to look at increasing the trustee program and "rent -a -jail." Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Benz. The motion passed, noting the objections of Essertier and Wiemans. City Manager Designee Ferrin said he would present, at the last meeting in April or the first meeting in May, a plan for addressing a reduction in expenditures by means other than eliminating personnel, for obtaining input, for identifying what is driving up the costs, and will set up milestones for the presentation of the plan, without dipping into reserves to balance the budget. CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward at this time to address Council were: Kathy Dunbabin - 2432 Myrtle, stated her objections to City Council Minutes 03-31-92 Page 7759 the closure of the Greenbelt parking, citing the adverse effects on the users of Clark Field; noted the number of activities that take place there, including basketball, baseball, tennis, as well as recreation classes; said parents drive their children and stay to watch the games, but now have to park three blocks away; said modifications could be done to make the area more attractive; said money was spent to upgrade the facilities, and now the parking has been taken away; requested a public hearing on closing the Greenbelt parking lot; Jerry Compton - said he had a petition objecting to the closure of the Greenbelt parking, which he would present at the next meeting; thought Council acted without proper information and without adequate public notice; cited the impact on residential neighborhoods surrounding the park, since the parking lots are full; said it would be simple to turfstone a portion of the Greenbelt, landscape it, and provide the same amount of parking spaces that have been available for the past 40 years or so. CLOSED SESSION The special meeting recessed at the hour of 10:38 p.m. to a closed session concerning personnel matters. The closed session convened at 10:45 p.m. for the purpose of considering matters of personnel. The closed session was adjourned at the hour of 11:33 p.m. to the special meeting. The special meeting reconvened at 11:34 p.m. ADJOURNMENT The Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday, March 31, 1992, at the hour of 11:35 p.m. to a Regular Meeting to be held Tuesday, April 14, 1992, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. rk Clity City rk C1 City Council Minutes 03-31-92 Page 7760 r V ; '•FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:30:14 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/FEBRUARY 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/FEBRUARY 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/FEBRUARY 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/FEBRUARY 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/FEBRUARY 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/FEBRUARY 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/FEBRUARY 92 -- H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/FEBRUARY 92....... --- 'CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/26/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00026 001-222-0000-2222 03/23/92 INV/REF 00006 $66, 214. 77CR -.- /DEFERRED PERS CREDIT 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00577 03/23/92 RETIREMENT 00026 001-400-1213-4160 00578 03/23/92 RETIREMENT - 00026 105-400-2601-4180 00172 03/23/92 - STREET LIGHTING 00026 109-400-3301-4180 00042 ----03/23/92 - VEH PKG DIST - 00026- 110-400-3302-4180 00176 - 03/23/92 PARKING ENF 00026 145-400-3401-4180 00148 03/23/92 DIAL -A RIDE 00026 • 03/23/92 H ,t PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 RETIREMENT/FEBRUARY 92 -------- --------- 03/23/92- H ' PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/FEBRUARY 92 145-400-3402-4180 00148 ESEA 145-400-3403-4180 00097 BUS PASS SUBSDY 00026 145-400-3408-4180 00017 03/23/92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 RETIREMENT/FEBRUARY 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/FEBRUARY 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREtIENT/FEBRUARY 92 - --------- • PUB -------PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/FEBRUARY 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/FEBRUARY 92 4 COMMUTER XPRESS 155-400-2102-4180 00147 03/23/92 --- -- • -. CROSSING GUARD - 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00173 03/23/92 • SEWER/ST DRAIN 00026 170-400-2103-4180 00047 03/23/92 - SPEC INVESTGTNS 00026` 705-400-1209-4180 00097 03/23/92 LIABILITY INS 00026 705-400-1217-4180 00097 03/23/92 WORKERS COMP $95,342.48 /RETIREMENT $39, 115. 14CR /RETIREMENT- $1,122.61 RETIREt1ENT- 31,122.61 /RETIREMENT 3172. 08 /RETIREMENT - $4,922.56 /RETIREMENT 3221. 96 /RETIREMENT $27.93 /RETIREMENT -- 619. 30 /RETIREMENT - $12. 39 /RETIREMENT 3128. 91 -/RETIREMENT ---- $988. 15 /RETIREMENT $5,686.20 /RETIREt1ENT - -- $273. 32 /RETIREMENT 3382. 36 /RETIREMENT 1 PAGE 0001 DATE 03/26/92 PO # CHK # AMOUt1T UNEP4C DATE EXP 40 219 ' V $0.00 03/21../92 IC 40319 , $0.00 03/26/92 30. 00 40319 03/26/92 40319 30.00 03/26/92 40319 $0.00 - 03/26/92 40319 $0.00 03/26/92 40319 " - k 30.00 --- 03/26/92 • .I 30. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 40319 03/26/92 �,.1 40319 j"iU 03/26/92 40319 03/26/92 40319 03/26/92 40319 03/26/92 40319 $0.00 - 03/26/92 40319 . $0:00 - 03/26/92 40319 30. 00 - - 03/26/92 . 0 `.J 1 kit FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13: 30:14 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ,CITY OF HERM0SA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/26/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL **#**** x*ir-rr*-tt3rar*3ttr#*-rr*-zririr*-zr*3rtr#aril***ar**erat*-tr*******#*;txar***-n x**ar**ar** *** PAY CODE TOTAL******#*a;r**atir*ir*ir**ar*et#u*at*at#*Stat****3r**arar**jt**at#**3r*****##*#x*tr#* R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 2 PORTABLE RADIOS/FIRE 00935 001-400-2201-5402 50243 03/11/92 FIRE -.. PAGE 0002 DATE 03/26/92 1. INV/REF PO # CHV # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $3,970.34 $3,970.34 00052 $1,367.95 - /EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 VENDOR TOTAL?#**#*##***##**n*#ar**#*#******#*ar**##*********#**#*#*#*#*##*#**#*#*# R APOLLO LEASING COMPANY LTD LEASE PAYMENT/APRIL 92 -1969 $1,367.95 02556 001-400-3104-6900 00092 $855.11 .03/25/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /LEASE PAYMENTS ** VENDOR TOTAL**-n**##a***#***#*#***n*****#*****##***-**#*#*##***###****#*****#***# R DAVID*AVADON DAMAGE DEPOSIT .REFUND_ 04583 001-210-0000-2110 35352 ... --._ 03/23/92 $855.11 50243 03434 40322 $1,367.10 03/26/92 88-1969 00066 40323 $0.00 03/26/92 04791 $500.00 35352 04426 40324 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00- - 03/26/92 #** VENDOR TOTAL *x#aat#**#####3rat#*#srtr**at*iter#aHt*##tt#*tt*;r*#*x*a#***###a#**#***#**#***#* R BERIAN PRINTING SERVICE, INC. DISASTER PROGRAM FORMS --- 02664 001-400-2201-4305 03/19/92---. -. - -.- FIRE $500.00 00544 $84.44 ---- /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL_******************************************************************** R GARY*BRUTSCH, -PETTY CASH/3-6 R GARY*BRUTSCH, PETTY CASH/3-6 R GARY*BRUTSCH, PETTY CASH/3-6 R GARY*BRUTSCH, PETTY CASH/3-6 R GARY*BRUTSCH, PETTY CASH/3-6 CITY TREASURER TO 3-23 . - CITY TREASURER TO 3-23 CITY TREASURER TO 3-23 CITY TREASURER TO 3-23 CITY TREASURER TO 3-23 . . . - 02_016 --.03/23/92 001-400-1202-4305 00428 FINANCE ADMIN 02016. 001-400-1205-4305 00118 03/23/92 CABLE TV 02016 001-400-1207-4305 00266 --03/23/92 BUS LICENSE 02016 • 001-400-2101-4305 01733 03/23/92 POLICE 02016 001-400-2101-4316 00874 -- 03/23/9 • POLICE $84.44 $0.29 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $8.64 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $25.00 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $70.10 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES /TRAINING $6.00 3367 03440 40325 $84.43 03/26/92 03849 40326 $0.00 03/26/92 03849 40326 $0.00 03/26/92 03849 40326 $0.00 03/26/92 • 03849 40326 $0.00 03/26/92 03849 40326 $0.00- 03/26/92 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:30:14 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R R R R R R R GARY*BRUTSCH, PETTY CASH/3-6 GARY*BRUTSCH, PETTY CASH/3-6 GARY*BRUTSCH, PETTY CASH/3-6 GARY*BRUTSCH, PETTY CASH/3-6 CITY TREASURER TO 3-23 CITY TREASURER TO 3-23 CITY TREASURER TO 3-23 CITY TREASURER TO 3-23 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/3-6 TO 3-23 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/3-6 TO 3-23 •CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH /. DEMAND LIST FOR 03/26/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02016 001-400-2201-4309 01275 03/23/92 FIRE - - -- 02016 001-400-2201-4316 00333 03/23/92 FIRE 02016 001-400-3103-4309 01333 03/23/92 ST MAINTENANCE 02016 001-400-4101-4305 00610 03/23/92 PLANNING 02016 03/23/92 02016 03/23/92 GARY-BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 PETTY CASH/3-6 TO 3-23- - --.------03/23/92 001-400-4201-4305 00753 BUILDING 001-400-4601-4308 00663 COMM RESOURCES 001-400-6101-4309 01206 -_PARKS PAGE 0003 DATE 03/26/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *17. 40 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *6. 00 /TRAINING $14.07 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $27.06 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $32.36 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *49. 55 /PROGRAM MATERIALS $45.00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL ata***#*aar***u****#a►a*#*prat***at*at*at**#*;t****##*******»*****##********* R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLINGS/MAR 92 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLINGS/MAR 92 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLINGS/MAR 92 $301.47 00016 001-400-3101-4303 00198 $465.30 03/25/92 MEDIANS - ---/UTILITIES--- .. 00016 001-400-4204-4303 00541 03/25/92 BLDG MAINT 00016 001-400-6101-4303 $288.28 /UTILITIES 00416 . $1,106.79 ---- 03/25/92 - - PARKS - - -/UTILITIES -- ool VENDOR TOTAL##*#»at*a►a►a►at#*4r#at#at#*atat##-uatat-*atetjtnatatarat*at*atar*ar###***it##*a►uar*at**at*aratat## R CENTINELA SO. BAY VISA ANNUAL FEE/PERSONNEL R CENTINELA SO. BAY VISA ANNUAL FEE/POLICE VENDOR TOTAL $1, 860. 37 03353 001-400-1203-4201 00906 $8.00 — 03/17/92 PERSONNEL- -- /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 03353 ' 001-400-2101-4305 03/18/92 POLICE 01729 $8. 00 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ******* t********#***** r#********-tt***************************** tat** 00389 001-400-2201-4305 MISC CHARGES/MAR 92 4951 03/02/92 FIRE R . CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT J $16. 00 00543 $23.17 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 03849 40326 $0.00 03/26/92 03849 40326 j'' $0.00 03/26/92 03849 40326 $0.00 03/26/92 03849 40326 $0.00 03/26/92 03849 40326 $0.00 03/26/92 03849 40326 $0.00 • 03/26/92 03849 40326 $0.00 03/26/92 00311 40327 ,'� - $0.00 -----03/26/92 .. 00311 40327 $0.00 03/26/92 00311 40327 $0.00 - 03/26/92 04608 40328 $0.00 --03/26/92 02141 40328 $0.'00 03/26/92 4951 00312 40329 $0.00 03/26/92 ' FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:30:14 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION •CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH /• DEMAND LIST FOR 03/26/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ #k ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0004 DATE 03/26/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # ,l ) AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL*************-a*-n-n*******n*- 3r- *n*-nor•n:t•*•ttu****•n********##*-ni►********** $23. 17 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92 00014 001-400-2101-4311 01388 $371.13 03/25/92 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00014 001-400-6101-4311 00278 $35.72 03/25/92 PARKS /AUTO MAINTENANCE -. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************•**************************i*********************** R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENTAL/MAR 92 89108 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENTAL/MAR 92 89108 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENTAL/MAR 92 _.89108 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENTAL/MAR 92 89108 03617 001-400-2101-4201 00984 03/18/92 POLICE 03617 001-400-2201-4201 00292 03/18/92 FIRE 03617 _03/18/92- 03617 03/18/92 001-400-2701-4201 00045 CIVIL DEFENSE -- 170-400-2103-4201 00112 SPEC INVESTGTNS *** VENDOR TOTAL *********•#****-******************** ********************* ***** R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY MAINT/JAN 92 20850 R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY MAINT/JAN 92 ... . 20850 $406. 85 $489. 57 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR $159. 40 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR $330. 18 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR $159. 39 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR **** $1,138.54 00267 001-400-3104-4251 00092 $514.73 02/25/92 IVAT IVAT IVAT IVAT TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 00267 105-400-2601-4251 00160 $514.73 .02/25/92 - • STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOUT * a^ VENDOR TOTAL ****************prat*******************• ****************************** R DICTAPHONE, INC. 02855 001-400-2101-4305 $1,029.46 01730 $232.29 DISPATCH HEADSET CLEANER 51968-- — 03/06/92 - ..- POLICE -- /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MIKE*DIRHAM V.P.D. LOGO/FINAL PMT- $232.29 MT.- $232.29 00313 40330 jJ $0. 00 03/26/92 00313 40330 40.00 03/26/92 3389108 00051 40331 $0.00 03/26/92 3389108 00051 44331 $0.00 03/26/92 3389108 3389108 00051 40331 $0.00 - 03/26/92 00051 40331 $0.00 03/26/92 120850 04806 40332 $0.00 03/26/92 120850 04806 40332 $0.00 - 03/26/92 M751968 04134 40333 • $232.33- 03/26/92 04453 109-400-3301-4201 00108 $430.00 —03/12/92-- . .-. VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT. 1 03368 40334 $0.00---03/26/92 J 0 J 41,4 n • • �• I FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:30:14 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION •CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH '• DEMAND LIST FOR 03/26/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *4* VENDOR TOTAL *#• • **• #*#******#*#**#********# u*• ##**#***##**#**• ******##******#**# R EASY STREET HOCKEY COMPANY REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES 1456 PACE 0005 DATE 03/26/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $430.00 04498 001-400-4601-4308 00662 $360.38 02/18/92 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS * VENDOR TOTAL *#*******•n* •***#**#•n******•n#-n*****• ####***#r•»#*#**• ********###***### R EMERG MED SERV PERSONNEL FUND RECERT FEE/J. CARROLL-- 03372 001-400-2201-4316 03/24/92 FIRE $360.38 00332 $85.00 /TRAINING ** VENDOR TOTAL #****#**-n**#*•*•»*•x*****•n**•»*•»#************************#*****ar****#*# R EMERG. MED SERV PERSONNEL FUND RECERT FEE/M. LINES 03371 001-400-2201-4316 03/24/92 FIRE $85.00 00331 $85.00 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL ***#***• *•r*#**• * •**•****•u******#*******#**•n•»**•n***#****#•a*#•»***#-n### R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 .-- .. . --- R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00448 03/25/92 CITY COUNCIL 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00499 03/25/92 - - CITY CLERK 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00362 - 03/25/92 CITY ATTORNEY 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00516 TELEPHONE CHCS/MAR 92 - -- - .--- 03/25/92-- GTE 3/25/92-- GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 • R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHCS/MAR 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 • - CITY TREASURER 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00553 • 03/25/92 CITY MANAGER 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00569 03/25/92 FINANCE ADMIN 00015 ' 001-400-1203-4304 00573 03/25/92 PERSONNEL 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00472 03/25/92 DATA PROCESSING $85.00 $6.84 /TELEPHONE $19.94 /TELEPHONE.- -- $8.55 /TELEPHONE $16.80 /TELEPHONE - $14. 53 /TELEPHONE $55.56 /TELEPHONE $39. 92 /TELEPHONE $78.10 /TELEPHONE - { 1456 03738 40335 $360.38 03/26/92 03447 40336 j1 $0.00 03/26/92 03446 40337 $0.00 03/26/92 00330 40339 $0.00 03/26/92 00330 40339 $0.00 03/26/92 • V 00330 40339 m $0.00 03/26/92 00330 40339 �:.� $0.00 03/26/92 • 00330 40339 $0.00 03/26/92 00330 40339 $0.00 - 03/26/92 00330 $0.00 40339 ' — 03/26/92 •.I 00330 40339 $0.00 03/26/92 M i FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:30:14 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHCS/MAR 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHCS/MAR 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 . R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 -- R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHGS/MAR 92 .CITY OF HERMOSA LEACH /• DEMAND LIST FOR 03/26/92 - VND 4* ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00380 03/25/92 BUS LICENSE 00015 001-400-1208-4304 00205 03/25/92 GEN APPROP 00015 001-400-2101-4304 01000 03/25/92 POLICE 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00425 03/25/92 FIRE 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00444 - 03/25/92 - ANIMAL CONTROL 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00573 03/25/92 PLANNING 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00516 -- 03/25/92 . - BUILDING 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00599 03/25/92 PUB WKS ADMIN 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00664 -03/25/92--- COMM RESOURCES 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00402 03/25/92 PARKS 00015 109-400-3301-4304 00046 -- 03/25/92-- VEH PKG DIST 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00575 03/25/42 PARKING ENF 00015 145-400-3401-4304 00110 03/25/92 DIAL A RIDE $17.94 /TELEPHONE - $8.83 /TELEPHONE $607.70 /TELEPHONE $78.12 /TELEPHONE $14.25 /TELEPHONE $61.00 /TELEPHONE $97.20 /TELEPHONE $136.25 /TELEPHONE $85.36 /TELEPHONE $8.55 /TELEPHONE $10.00 /TELEPHONE $160.21 /TELEPHONE $4.16 /TELEPHONE VENDOR TOTAL_ ********************************** -******-n************ ***** ******** R HARBOR CITY ENTERPRISES, INC. 03571 001-400-2101-4311 MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 92 25806--- -- 03/18/92 - POL_ICE $1, 529. 81 PAGE 0006 DATE 03/26/92 INV/REF PO # CHK tk AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 1 00330 40339 , $0.00 03/26/92. 00330 40339 $0.00 03/26/92 00330 40339 $0.00 03/26/92 00330 40339 $0.00 03/26/92 00330 40339 $0.00 03/26/92 00330 4IDT339 $0.00 03/26/92 00330 40339 $0.00 03/26/92 00330 40339 $0.00 03/26/92 00330 40339 $0.00 03/26/92 00330 40339 $0.00 03/26/92 1 00330 40339 j''i $0.00 03/26/92 00330 40339 $0.00 03/26/92 00330 40339 • $0.00 03/26/92 01386 $299.42 25806 00334 40340 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 03/26/92 0 fs* FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:30:14 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 'CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH /• DEMAND LIST FOR 03/26/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN ## AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ ## ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *#* VENDOR TOTAL****#***********#*#***********#*****#**#**#***#*****#*#*****#***#*** R HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SERV, INC. WORK COMP ADMIN/APR-JUN PAGE 0007 DATE 03/26/92 INV/REF FO ## CHK ## AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $299.42 04108 705-400-1217-4201 00140 $7,000.00 03/17/92 WORKERS COMP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *#* VENDOR TOTAL********#***********************************#******************•***** R HEIMAN FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC'. STEPS/FIRE ENGINE 15400 $7. 000. 00 03681 001-400-2201-4309 01274 $304.00 03/05/92 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R HERMOSA BCH CITY SCHOOL DIST. FIELD MAINT PMT/MAR 92 PMT -3 . 02066 001-400-6101-4201 03/25/92 PARKS $304. 00 ' •.1 0O044 40341 $0.00 03/26/92 15400 03432 40342 '1 $312.05 03/26/92 00270 $1,100.00 PMT -3 00074 40343 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/26/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL#################################•u################################## R HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY COMPUTER SYS MAINT/MAR92 L1R12 $1,100.00 00149 001-400-1206-4201 00965 $1,202.00 83L1R12 00009 - 03/03/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************#*********************** R HIWAY MARKING SYSTEMS FILTERS/PAINT STRIPER $1,202.00 00280 001-400-3104-4309 00846 $153.09 6135 03/03/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *#* VENDOR TOTAL**###***#*#*****##*********#********#***********#*************###*** ,R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC DISCOUNT OFFERED R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC DISCOUNT TAKEN R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC MISC CHARGES/MAR 92 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC MISC CHARGES/MAR 92 02458 001-202-0000-2021 00171 03/25/92 $153. 09 $13.65 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 02458 001-202-0000-2022 00167 $13.65CR 03/25/92 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 02458' 001-400-3104-4309 00849 $53.04 03/25/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 02458 001-400-4204-4321 00642 $75.11 -:---03/25/92 -- -- BLDG MAINT -- /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT- J 40344 J 03/26/92 i. • 'to 6135 03687 40345 $148.09 03/26/92 00337 40346 $0.00 03/26/92 1 00337 40346 . $0.00 - 03/26/92 • 00337 40346 $0:00 03/26/92 00337 40346 $0.00 - - 03/26/92 1 1 'G FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:30:14 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC MISC CHARGES/MAR 92 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC MISC CHARGES/MAR 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH /• DEMAND LIST FOR 03/26/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02458 001-400-6101-4309 ...03/25/92 PARKS PAGE 0008 DATE 03/26/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 01208 $273.95 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 02458 105-400-2601-4309 00795 $267.44 03/25/92 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL **************-**4****•*********.********•***********-************4 **** R JOHNSON'S BRAKE SUPPLY HONDA BRAKE PADS/POLICE .19262 $669. 54 00319 001-400-2101-4311 01387 $50.05 03/03/92 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************•********•nor************ R LES FRAMES ENTERPRISES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 89500 04587 001-300-0000-3115 03/23/92 $50. 05 04550 $89.00 /BUSINESS LICENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL ;r*ir*ar#tr•sir**-grit**#*****ar•n#at**• •n#**ir****#•sf• **ar***Mara►*********ar#•;t***at*at* R COUNTY OF*LOS ANGELES RECERT FEE/J. CARROLL $89. 00 01896 001-400-2201-4316 00330 $100.00 03/24/92 FIRE /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R COUNTY OF*LOS ANGELES RECERT FEE/M. LINES 03390 001-400-2201-4316 03/24/92 FIRE $100. 00 00329 $100.00 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************;tar************************ MANHATTAN FORD MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92 R MANHATTAN FORD MISC. CHARGES/MAR -92 R MANHATTAN FORD MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92 R MANHATTAN FORD MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92 - 00605 001-400-3101-4311 00036 03/25/92 MEDIANS 00605 001-400-4201-4311 00280 - 03/25/92 BUILDING - - 00605 001-400-4202-4311 00211 03/25/92 PUB WKS ADMIN 00605 110-400-3302-4311 00771 ------03/25/92 PARKING ENF $100. 00 $180. 99 /AUTO MAINTENANCE , $120.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE . $69. 71 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $100. 11 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 1 00337 40346 $0. 00 - 03/26/92 00337 40346 $0.00 03/26/92 19262 04141 40347 $50.05 03/26/92 789500 04302 40343 $0. 00 03/26/92 03445 40349 $0.00 03/26/92 03444 40350 $0.00 03/26/92 00346 40351 $0.00 03/26/92 00346 40351 • $0.00 -03/26/92 00346 40351 $0. 00 03/26/92 00346 40351 , $0.00 -- 03/26/92 • 21 0 I CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—SFA340 t ', DEMAND LIST TIME 13:30:14 FOR 03/26/92 • PAY VENDOR NAME VND # DATE INVC ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHR # '.l DESCRIPTION PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP i',—,' R MANHATTAN FORD00605 170-400-2103-4311 00036 $50.00 00346 40351 i' 1''1 H MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92 -- -03/25/92 --- SPEC INVESTGTNS /AUTO MAINTENANCE---- $0.00 03/26/92 .�,I *** VENDOR TOTAL***-n•**************************************************************** PAGE 0009 DATE 03/26/92 $520. 81 R MASTER K-9 03120 001-400-2101-4201 00986 $65.00 174 04144 40352 K-9 MAINT TRAINING/FEB92-- 174 03/01/92 210005 POLICE --/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/26/92 • *** VENDOR TOTAL*****-**************************************-n**u******************** $65. 00 R CHRISTY*MC INTYRE 04588 001-300-0000-3826 03789 $45.00 34589 03778 40353 I -L SPRING CLASS REFUND 34589 03/16/92 460002 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES $0.00 03/26/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL *************-n-- *ar**- ***********************;►-u*-nor************-n-r#-nor*** $45. 00 R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. 03080 001-141-0000-1401 00173 $3,198.73 920159 04816 40354 —i UNLEADED GAS/CITY YARD-- 20159 ----03/20/92 - __._ . __ ... - .. .._ _.- __._ /GASOLINE INVENTORY--- -- - $0.00 03/26/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL *********************************************** -r******************** $3, 198. 73 R MOORE BUSINESS FORMS 00423 110-400-3302-4305 00894 $4,456.51 72624490 03339 40355 PKG CITE NOTICE FORMS- .24490-- 02/19/92-- - PARKING ENE --- -/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES — - - --- $4,962.46- -- 03/26/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL *************************************** -n*** -n************************ $4,456.51 R I MULTIFORCE SYSTEMS CORP. 01720 001-400-1206-4201 00966 $1,006.00 900887 01720 40356 FUEL SYS MAINT/APR—JUN92.00887----....03/26/92 -- . • -- DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT -- $0.00 03/26/92 *n* VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,006.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** ' R PATRICK*MURPHY 04585 001-210-0000-2110 04792 $500.00 33092 04424 40357 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND- - 33092 -. --- 03/18/92 ----- -- - -- — /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 03/26/92 $500. 00 'i R OLIVER, BARR & VOSE 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00706 $10,058.70 02142 40358 LEGAL SERV/FEB 92 - 02/29/92 CITY ATTORNEY ---/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/26/92 • I .r I• 0 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:30:14 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R OLIVER, BARR & VOSE LEGAL SERV/FEB 92 •CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/26/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0010 DATE 03/26/92 , INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP !I I 1 02142 40356 , $0.00 03/26/92 i 02692 001-400-1131-4201 00707 $150.00 . .. 02/29/92 420001 CITY ATTORNEY - ./CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL *************-u**t******************************n*-x*******#****-a-***** R PACIFIC EQUIP & IRRIGATION CUSHMAN REPAIR PARTS $10,208.70 00406 110-400-3302-4311 00770 $4,249.79 03/17/92 -_ PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL *******************************************#** -n* -n******************* R PACIFIC FIBRE & ROPE CO., INC. 00675 DISCOUNT OFFERED 92621 -.... -... 03/17/92 R PACIFIC FIBRE & ROPE CO., INC. DISCOUNT TAKEN R PACIFIC FIBRE & ROPE CO., INC. ROPE/BRAID FOR CITY YARD -92621 --- -- R PACIFIC FIBRE & ROPE CO., INC. ROPE/BRAID FOR CITY YARD 92621 R PACIFIC FIBRE & ROPE CO. , INC. ROPE/BRAID FOR CITY -YARD 92621.------ 03/17/92 001-202-0000-2021 00675 001-202-0000-2022 92621 , 03/17/92 $4.249.79 00169 $4.10 • --- - --DISCOUNTS OFFERED 00165 $4. 10CR /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 00675 001-400-3104-4309 00847 03/17/92 - - TRAFFIC SAFETY. 00675 001-400-4204-4309 02290 03/17/92 • BLDG MAINT 00675 105-400-2601-4309 00794 - STREET LIGHTING - $135. 30 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $135.30 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01698 40359 $4,259.96 03/26/92 92621 03690 40360 $0.00 03/26/92 92621 03690 40360 $0.00 03/26/92 92621 03690 40360 $147.94- 03/26/92 92621 03690 40360 ' $147.95 03/26/92 $135.30 92621 03690 40360 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - --- - $147.94 -••03/26/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************** -nor******************** $405.90 R PAK WEST . MISC CHARGES/FEB 92 ---- 00519 001-400-4204-4309 02291 $169.71 810083/809153 00254 09153 . .-. 02/27/92 - BLDG MAINT-- -- /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 03/26/92 40361 u oa VENDOR TOTAL ******************************* -nor*********************************** $169.71 R PET CARE COMPANY TEMPORARY BANNER REFUND 33856.-- 04582 001-210-0000-2110 03/23/92 04794 8250.00 33856 04427 40362 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE • $0.00 03/26/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MIKE*POWE -- V. P. D.. LOGO/FINAL PMT — $250.00 04452 109-400-3301-4201 00109 8430.00 - — 03/12/92 - .. ---- VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT.- 03369 40363 30.00 03/26/92 J 1 .1 0 01. NIP FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:30:14 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH / DEMAND LIST FOR 03/26/92 PAGE 0011 DATE 03/26/92 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************4,r**********4****i********** $430. 00 R RADIO SHACK 01429 001-400-3104-4309 00848 $4.19 MISC CHARGES/MAR 92 81114 03/18/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************star************ t** tit***** $4. 19 J 81114 00358 40364 ,0 $0.00 03/26/92 R DONALD*R.ODGERS 04581 001-210-0000-2110 04796 $50.00 35303 04429 40365 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 35303 03/23/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 03/26/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00 R BETTY*RYAN 03631 001-210-0000-2110 04795 $1,000.00 25990 04428 40366 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 25990 03/23/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 03/26/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,000.00 R MICHELLE*SALAZAR 04518 001-300-0000-3411 01707 $20.00 30622 03781 40367 THEATRE RENTAL REFUND 30622 ---- 03/17/92 /OTHER FACILITIES $0.00 03/26/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.00 R SHORELINE PRINTING 03505 001-400-2101-4305 01732 $405.94 9648 04127 40368 "BOOKING FORMS"/POLICE 9648 02/20/92 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $405.94 03/26/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 001-400-2101-4306 01149 MISC CHARGES/MAR 92 929-5 -- 03/04/92 POLICE $405.94 $123.79 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $123.79 146929-5 00362 40369 $0.00 03/26/92 R SOURISSEAU SUPPORT SERVICES 02075 ' 001-400-2101-4201 00985 $2477.50 2052 04143 40370 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION 2052 03/07/92 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/26/92 .. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************* $297.50 R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL 00107 001-400-2101-4201 00987 $76.75 BLOOD ALCOHOL TESTING 03/17/92 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 04145 40371 $0.00 03/26/92 II V '• I I I,® R FINANCE—SFA340 TIME_ 13:30:14 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST ,FOR 03/26/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ### VENDOR TOTAL ######******.*********•*******goat##******prat•gar#*********** **.********* R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITATION SURCHARGE/FEB92 PAGE 0012 DATE 03/26/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $76.75 00118 110-300-0000-3302 44829 $15,574.00 03/25/92 /COURT FINES/PARKING ### VENDOR TOTAL###***?r***###********#*•n***#•n#*•*#•n###*#********-n#*#**#**#*•u***#?r*** R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITATION COURT BAIL 00400 110-300-0000-3302 44828 03/23/92 $15,574.00 $694. 00 /COURT FINES/PARKING * * VENDOR TOTAL **** ***#*##•*******************************.******#*#**#********.*#•n R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MAR 92 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MAR 92 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/MAR 92 00159 001-400-3104-4303 00106 03/25/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00540 03/25/92 - - BLDG MAINT- ---- — 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00415 03/25/92 PARKS $694. 00 $175.01 /UTILITIES $2,848.34 /UTILITIES $429. 62 /UTILITIES ### VENDOR TOTAL ########•n##############•n###########*#####• #####• #################### $3,452.97 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. GAS BILLINGS/MAR 92 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00539 $503.41 03/25/92 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES ### VENDOR TOTAL####;,###x##################•n######################################## Ft SOUTHWEST REGIONAL TRNG CENTER SEMINAR. REG/VANOLE 6999 R SOUTHWEST REGIONAL TRNG CENTER SEMINAR REG/HULL .. -. . . 6999.. 00884 001-400-1203-4316 00220 03/24/92 PERSONNEL 00884 001-400-1208-4316 00007 03/24/92 GEN APPROP - $503. 41 $115. 00 /TRAINING - $115.00 /TRAINING *## VENDOR TOTAL#####################################*############################## R GENE#SPENCER . REFUND PUB WORKS DEPOSIT 32769 i $230. 00 • 04706 40372 j"I $0. 00 03/26/92 03372 40373 $0. 00 03/26/92 00366 40374 $0.00 03/26/92 00366 40374 $0.00 - 03/26/92 • 00366 40374 $0.00 03/26/92 00367 40375 $0.00 03/26/92 6999 03080 40376 $115.00 03/26/92 6999. 03080 '•04584 001-210-0000-2110 04793 520.00 32769 ----03/23/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE -- - - - - 40376 $115.00 03/26/92 04425 40377 $0. 00 -- 03/26/92 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:30:14 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ,CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH /, DEMAND LIST FOR 03/26/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** _ - • STATE OF CALIFORNIA WEAPON APPS/FEB 92 00364 001-400-2101-4251 05386 03/16/92 POLICE PAGE 0013 DATE 03/26/92 •• INV/REF PO # CHK # v AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $20.00 00431 $27.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** • STEENSON'S BUSINESS SUPPLIES TYPEWRITER RIBBONS/P.D. 9116 04520 001-400-2101-4305 03/11/92 POLICE $27.00 01731 $261.88 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** • TODD PIPE & SUPPLY DISCOUNT OFFERED 0161H • TODD PIPE & SUPPLY DISCOUNT TAKEN • TODD PIPE & SUPPLY MISC CHARGES/MAR 92 00124 001-202-0000-2021 03/25/92 00124 001-202-0000-2022 0161H. ---•03/25/92 - - - - 00124 001-400-6101-4309 -0161H- 03/25/92 PARKS *261.88 00170 $0.88 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 00166 $0.88CR /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 01207 $43.14 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS * ** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** • TOOMEY, ARTIANO & WOHN REFUND WITNESS FEES 34221 04586 001-300-0000-3818 03/18/92 $43.14 04373 $150.00 /POLICE SERVICES *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** * *4 PAN, CODE TOTAL ****************************************************************** *** TOTAL WARRANTS ****************************************************************** • $150.00 $69,813.66 $73,784.00 I HER( CERTIFY THAT TH THE WARRANTS LISTED ON WARRANT REGISTER FOR _ FUNDS ARE AVAILAOLE FOR TO THE DGET. BY / FINIA' apt 1/12Ef'CTORAl DATE 905386 00023 40378 $0.00 03/26/92 9116 04117 40379 $264.24 03/26/92 30161H 00374 4030 $0.00 03/26/92 30161H 00374 40380 $0.00 03/26/92; 30161H 00374 40380 $0.00 03/26/92 34221 04423 40381 $0.00 03/26/92 E DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY PAGE1r INCLUSIVE, OF THE ARE ACCURATE,_ PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE -4 0 0 O FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:(0:51 PAY ENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 4 u 9 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/02/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION H BANC ONE LEASING CORPORATION 03422 001-400-2101-6900 NEW LEASE/PATROL-CARS-------1-002 03/19/92----- ------ --- -- POLICE • *** VENDOR TOTAL **************-x• -a-x-u*******-x-»*** ►-x*• *****-x**********-»***•r#- ********** PAGE 0001 DATE 04/02/92 to • INV/REF PO 4l CHK # AMOUNT UNENC Oil EXP II 00592 $14,007.00 060491-002 00076 40252 —/LEASE PAYMENTS- --- - ------ $0. 00- -04/02/92- e II IG • 14 $14,007.00 *** PAY CODE TOTAL*******•x********4***-n***-x**************-n*•»**-u************-»-n******* $14,007.00 16 O ' O 5 R ADVANCE ELEVATOR ELEVATOR-MAINT/APR-92 28511 04/01f92 ---- -.------BLDG MAINT---fCONTRACT SERVICEfPRIVAT $0.00-04/02/92 00003 001-400-4204-4201 00516 $90.00 28511 00003 40385 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** Q., O :5 17 J1 O )2 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/APRIL-92 00935 001-400-1205-4201 -50772 03/25/92- - -CABLE--TV R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/APRIL-92 ---50772 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/APRIL--92- 00935 001-400-2101-4201 03/25/92— POLICE --- 00935 001-400-2201-4201 50772 03/25/92 FIRE R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/APRIL- 92-----50648 00935 110-400-3302-4307 03/25/92-- - ----PARKING- $90.00 00059 $164.00 --/CONTRACT SERVICE/PR 50772 00048 40386 IVAT- - - - - - $0.00 04/02/92- 00995 $1,427.50 50772 -----------/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT- - 00294 $195.00 /CONTRACT--SERVICE/PR 00055 $314.00 ENF----- /RADIO-MAINTENANC 00048 40386 -$0.00---04/02/92 50772 00048 40386 IVAT------- $0: 00-04/02/92- 50648 00058 40386 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,100.50 0 35 1.39 R AIDS RESIDENCE PROGRAM --- ----CLEANUP-DEPOSIT REFUND ----35499 0 4 O I. p.1 d 13 14 fl r ';':1 t.l .:!e4 $0:00---04/02/92 .,, 04591 001-210-0000-2110 04801 $50.00 35499 04430 40387 et 03/26/92 - -_ _.._.--_____.. _--/DEPOSITS/WORK -GUARANTEE $0.00 - -- 04/02/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 40 O .11 • 44 • Jf 0 w w 50 S.1 57 i4 55 R AMERICAN EAGLE BUS/CHILDRENS' EXCURSION R AMERICAN EAGLE BUS/MAGIC MOUNTAIN TRIP $50.00 03118 145-400-3409-4201 00015 $295.00 03707 40388 04/01/92- REC TRANSPTN------/CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT-------- - $295.00 04/02/92 03118 145-400-3409-4201 00016 $400.00 03/24/92------------• -- REC -TRANSPTN ---/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT-- - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92 -- — 6878 $695.00 00857 001-400-2101-4306 01152 03/31/92---- - ---POLICE $67.50 /PRISONER -MAINTENANCE ----- 03785 40388 C $0.00--- 04/02/92 6878 00035 40389 $0.00 •-- 04/02/92-N! rr FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:00:51 ® 6 01-! n PAY iENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/02/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0002 DATE 04/02/92 INV/REF PO 4' CHK 5 AMOUNT UNENC 'DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL*******a*******************a******************-a********************* $67.50 it ,4 R B & L CRANE SERVICE 02442 001-400-4204-4309 02294 $210.00 CRANE/WINDMILL. REPAIR 03/12/92 BLDG MAINT-------/MAINTENANCE-MATERIALS r *** VENDOR TOTAL***a**************************************************************** R • BLICKMAN, INC. 03092 THEATRESECH/3-18_T0_21 03/24192 16 ® i7 R BLICKMAN, INC. LITE TECH/3-6 TO 3 7 *** VENDOR TOTAL :4 L7 0 $210.00 001-400-4601-4201 01281 $161.00 COMM -RESOURCES --/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 03092 001-400-4601-4201 01282 $161.00 03/16/92 - R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH_INS/APR .92 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/APR-9P 3, n 34 s 39 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/APR.92 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY-. HEALTH INS/APR -92- R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92 33 a BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH.INS/APR-92 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA __CITY HEALTH INS/APR-92 - COMM -RESOURCES --/CONTRACT--SERVICE/PRIVAT-- $322.00 03699 40390 $250.00 04/02/92 ,4 0 —T3, 03786 40391 ,e 1® $0.00--04/02/-92- 03776 40391 01308 001-400-1212-4188 02350 $70.09 04/01/92 -EMP -BENEFITS----/EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS 01308 109-400-3301-4188 00254 $2.77 04/01/92 VEH-PV.G-DIST—/EMPLOYEE--BENEFI-TS 01308 110-400-3302-4168 01523 $4.16 04/01192- -PARK I NG--ENF- --- -----/EMPLOYEE -- BENEF I TS 00055 40392 $0.00 ---04/02/92 00055 40392 ,1 $0.00 04/02!92-,' 0009540392 ----------- $0.00 04f02l92 00055 40392 -$0:0004/02/92 00055 40392 •'-, 10 $0.00- -04/02/92. , 00055 40392 $0. 00-04/02/92 • 01308 145-400-3401-4188 01274 $0.69 —/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS --------- 01308 145-400-3402-4188 01261 $0.28 04/01/92— -----....-- ..-- ESEA--------- --/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ---- 01308 155-400-2102-4188 00781 $0.69 04/01/92-- CROSSING GUARD BENEFITS - 01308 160-400-3102-4188 01239 $1.07 04/01/92--- SEWER/ST- DRAIN —/EMPLOYEE -BENEFITS------------- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $79.75 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/APR.-92 •J '4 53. 51, 00055 40392 - - - $0.00 ---- 04/02/92 01293 001-400-1212-4188 02352_ 317.591,20 00056 40393 04/01/92 --.-- ---.-.----.EMP BENEFITS ----!EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS-----------•--- - $0.00------04/02/92- If O 0 Q. ♦4 i 4 4 6 4 6 6 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:i00:51 2 PAY 'VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 6 i' a 9 ,a 16 2, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/02/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # PAGE 0003 DATE 04/02/92 AMOUNT INV/REF PO ' CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED -.--CITY. HEALTH INS/APR -92 01293 110-400-3302-4188 01525 $916.66 04101/92------ PARKING--ENF------/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS---- ; R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED 01293 145-400-3403-4188 00445 $13.18 CITY HEALTH--INS/APR-92 04/01/92 BUS PASS SUBSDY-/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED ' 01293 705-400-1217-4188 d0609 $118.37 ----- C ITY . HEALTH INS/APR-92 04/01/92---------. ..--...- - . WORKERS -COMP ----/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL ********* -u -n* -n -n -n*** -n* -n* -n** -*-n*** ►**-n***-»**-u* ►-n******-»*****-»********** 00056 40393 - $0. 00 — 04/02/92 00056. 40393 $0.00---04/02/ $18,639.41 JAMES*BURGUE --THEATRE TECH/3-1 &-3-7-- 02544 -3-7--- 02544 001-400-4601-4201 01283 $121.00 --------03/24/92-- - - COMM RESOURCES. -/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT- -- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $121.00 0 I 00006 40393 $0.00- -04/02/92 2c 27 63: 6 3 f. 3•. w 39 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 -CITY-HEALTH INS/APR 92 -- -- -- --- 04/01/92 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/APR-92- R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN ----CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92 u ® as ac •,, a Sa 56 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/APR-92 03777 40394 $0.00 ---04/02/92 ., 1 001-400-1212-4188 02351 $867.47 00041 40395 " - —EMP—BENEFITS ----/EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS----------- 00238 BENEFITS---------- - 00238 105-400-2601-4188 01267 $29.61 04/01-/92 STREET -LIGHTING -/EMPLOYEE --BENEFITS 00238 109-400-3301-4188 04/01/92--- -- VEH PKG 00238 110-400-3302-4188 04/01/92-- ---------- -- PARKING R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 -- CITY HEALTH INS/APR- 92 -------------.04/01/92 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/APR-92 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92- - -------- R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92 ----- R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN -- CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92- 00255 00041 40395 $0:00---04/02/ $2.65 00041 DIST- —/EMPLOYEE- BENEFITS------------ ------ $0.00 - 01524 $126.40 00041 ENF ----/EMPLOYEE -BENEFITS-------- - ----- $0. 00- 145-400-3401-4188 01275 DIAL A RIDE --- 0023B 145-400-3402-4188 01262 04/01/92— ESEA - 00238 145-400-3403-4188 04/01/92 BUS PASS 00238 145-400-3408-4188 04/01/92 - COMMUTER 00238 155-400-2102-4188 04/01/92 —. _.._.------...- CROSSING $4. 25 --/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS --------- $0. 44 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00444 $0. 53 SUBSDY-/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00084 $0. 26 XPRESS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00762 $1.77 GUARD --/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - -7- 1 40395 -04/02/92 40395 —04/02/92- 00041 40395 -.- --$0.00 04/02/92 , 00041 40395 $0.00 -04/02/92 00041 40395 $0.00 04/02/92 00041 40395 $0.00 04/02/42 00041 00041 40395 $0. 00 04/02/92 or - 0 FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 14:10:51 74. i i5f' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/02/92 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION li. 4 PAGE 0004 DATE 04/02/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 160-400-3102-4188 01240 $22.54 _ __CITY HEALTH .INS/APR..92_.____._--.__-.04/01/92__________._.__SEWER/SL.DRAIN... JEMPLOYEE BENEFITS---- CA ENEFITS-- CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CIT.Y.HEALTH_INS/APR_92 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH CITY HEALTH INS/APR..92__ R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY_ HEALTIL INS/APR_92 21 00238 170-400-2103-4188 00251 *3.48 04/01/92—,._ --_-.SPEC-INVESTGTNS-IEMPLOYEE-BENEFITS PLAN 00238 705-400-1209-4188 00550 *4.42 ___..___ 04/01192___ ................._.__. LIABILITY_ INS ___/EMPLOYEE. BENEFITS. _____ 00238 705-400-1217-4188 00608 *16.63 04/01/92 WORKERS-_COMP----/EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL****•n*************************************************************** *1,080.45 R THE*CALIF PARK L. REC. SOCIETY ANNUAL.. DUES/M_-_ROONEY 00602 001-400-4601-4315 00100 *100.00 03/16/92--.--...------ COMM RESOURCES -MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************9******************************* 24 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/APR-92 R CANADA LIFE ________ __CITY HEALTH - INSLAPR--92 34 1 ;',7-- * 47 40 *100. 00 00046 001-400-1212-4188 02346 *657.90 04/01/92— EMP BENEFITS —/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00046 170-400-2103-4188 00248 *77.40 04/01/92------------ SPEC-INVESTGTNS-./EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS — *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************-******************************•******************•*** . #735.30 00041 40395 $0.00 --04/02/92- H 00041 40395 $0.00---04/02/92- 00041 40395 $0.00---04/02/-92 00041 40395 *0 00-04/02/-92- 03751 40396 40.00--04/02/92- If IH 2; 22 :l 4 • 0 40 O 40 00008 40397 • 0 — 40.00-04/02/92- F? CARE STATION 03972 705-400-1217-4182 00222 $264.00 13882-0 __ .___.LAB TEST/OFCR G.-GAINES---882-0 —03/18192---------.-. -...-.-.- WORKERS -COMP ---/WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR. *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************************•u*************** *264.00 R JEANNE*CARUSO __TUITION REIMB/SPRING 92 03293 001-400-2101-4316 00876 *270.00 03/26/92-__ . _. _. . POLICE ------ --•---/TRAINING..-..--- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92 $270.00 00014 001-400-2101-4311 01393 $264.54 03/31/92 ------------ ----- POLICE ------------/AUTO MAINTENANCE -- 1 - -- 00008 40397 .$0.00- --.04/02/92 04609 40398 *0.00 -04/02/92 04148 40399 *0.00 04/02/92 00313 40400 04/02/92 . 50. 00 •i o 0 0 O 0 01, ,31 6 8 u 11 11� FINANCE-SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST TIME 14:'00:51 PAGE 0005FOR 04/02/92 DATE 04/02/92 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO} CHK # • DATE INVC . PROJ # ° ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************-n*-»***-n**-n**********-»******-»*-»**** 14 1 1- $264. 54 • R ' CHEVRON USA, INC. 00634 170-400-2103-4310 00048 $749.57 1417284419 00315 40401 ;LJF_STNET-GASOLINE/MAR-92-94419 03/31/92-- - ---SPEC--INVESTOTNS-/MOTOR--FUELS--AND-LUBES-- -•- - $O; 00---04/02/ *** VENDOR TOTAL************-u****4****-n*****-x*-u************************************* R COMPUTERLAND INFOSYSTEMS $749. 57 04563 001-400-4101-5402 00005 $1,590.00 ARIA25-078247 01969 40402 LASER -PRINTER/PLANNING--78247 03/13192---,- ----- PLANNING-----/EQUIP-MORE-THAN--$500---•--------$1,590.00-04/02/92 -_ - *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 21 27 $1,590.00 R DANIEL FREEMAN MEMORIAL HOSP. 00047 001-400-1203-4320 00414 $800.00 80000162-0017 04612 40403 FIREFIGHTER PHYSICALS -----0017 02/29/92-- ------- ---- PERSONNEL------. -/PRE-EMPLOYMENT--EXAMS -- $0.00---04/02/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL *********************************************** ->f******************** $800.00 2,3 1,1 R VIRGINIA*ELLEDGE REIMB-TRAVEL-EXPENSE TR396 03/26/92 POLICE --------/TRAINING 03797 001-400-2101-4316 00878 $7.30 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R $7.30 HA TR396 04151 40404 '1 $0:00--04/02/92-;,1 y, UN -EMP CLAIMS/SEP-DEC-91-339-6------03/24/92--------- UNEMPLOYMENT ----/UNEMPLOYMENT EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 01397 705-400-1215-4186 00099 $3,812.00 932-0339-6 04707 40409 f,,. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 0- 1.39 . W Q ]9 l y. 44 46 4' 51 R STEVE*ENDOM 01034001-400-2101-4312 01887 $27.30 04511 40406 I '^ REIMB MILES/POST-CLASS - 03/30/92 - - - -- - POLICE ----- /TRAVEL- EXPENSE -s -- POST--- -- ----- - $0. 00- 04/02/92 • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $27.30 $3,812.00 I. 1 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE -CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92--------------04/01/92 04397 001-400-1212-4188 02349 04/01/92 ------------ --- EMP BENEFITS --- 04397 105-400-2601-4188 01266 STREET -LIGHTING $359.20 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS --- 00028 40407 $0.00 -04/02/92.. *23. 45 00028 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - *0.00 04/02/92 40407 1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:00:51 ®( 01 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/02/92 PAGE 0006 DATE 04/02/92 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION O U VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH_INS/APR._92 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH-.INS/APR_92 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE _- — ___.CITY HEALTH INS/APR._92.__.--- • 1 0 •, 0 0 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC 'DATE EXP 04397 109-400-3301-4188 00253 $2.10 04/01Z92-__...__-_-_- _---_VEH.-PKG-DIST---._!EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS------ 04397 110-400-3302-4188 01522$107.10 -- 04/01/92-- -PARKING-ENF-=/EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS 04397 145-400-3401-4188 01273 $3.36 04/01/92— - - . _ _DIAL -A . R IDE.- ----./EMPLOYEE - BENEFITS 04397 145-400-3402-4188 C LTY._HEALTH_INS/APR_92 04/01/-92 -__ ESEA R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE _CITY HEALTH INS/APR.92 __--_-._- R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/APR.92 01260 $0.22 --/EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS 00028 40407 ----- 30.00----04/02A92- 04397 145-400-3408-4188 00083 $0.14 04/01/92.---.. COMMUTER-XPRESS-/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -- 00028 40407 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 If+ II $0,00---04/02/92- 00028 00028 40407 $0.00..---04/02/92_ .• 00028 40407 $0.00 04/02/92 00028 40407 2+ -------------- --- $0.00 -- _04/02/92 04397 155-400-2102-4188 00780 $1.40 04/01/92---- --- -_-_-- CROSSING GUARD ---/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS --------- R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE 04397 CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92 04/01/92 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/APR--92 33 O � 39 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/APR-.92 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH-INS/APR-92 160-400-3102-4188 01238 $18.69 SEWER/ST DRAIN --/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ------ 04397 170-400-2103-4188 00250 $26.25 04/01/92-----------SPEC--INVESTGTNS-/EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS 04397 705-400-1209-4188 00549 $2.80 04/01/92--- -- -_- -.-... LIABILITY -INS ---/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS------------- --- 04397 705-400-1217-4188 00607 $3.50 04/01/92-.-- --- - ----- WORKERS -COMP ----/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS------ *** VENDOR TOTAL**************•*******-**************************************-********* $548.21 } - O 'C R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY- HEALTH INS/APR-92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APR-92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH-INS/APR-92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APR.92 02623 001-400-1212-4188 02348 04/01/92- --------------- EMP -BENEFITS --- 02623 105-400-2601-4188 01265 04/01/92-- - - - -- STREET-LIGHTING- $3,087.10 TREET-LIGHTING- $3.087.10 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2.35 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 110-400-3302-4188 01521 392.67 04/01/92- PARKING-ENF--- ---/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ---- 00028 40407 $0.00 ---04/02/92- 00028 40407 $0.00- 04/02/92 00028 40407 $0.00---04/02/92- 00028 40407 $0.00- 04/02/92 00028 40407 - $00004/O2/92 0 ;0 00001 40408 a - 30. 00 --04/02/92 C 40408 $0.00. 04/02/92, 00001 40408 I' it $0.00-- -04/02/92 . 02623 145-400-3401-4188 01272 $1.18 00001 40408 ... 04/01/-92-------- -- ---- DIAL -A-RIDE ---/EMPLOYEE. BENEFITS ---------- -- $0.00 04/02/92 • a 0 .Iy A k9 r11 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:00:51 PAY IIVENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/02/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC, PROJ # .ACCOONT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0007 DATE 04/02/92 INV/REF PO ' CHK # AMOUNT UNENC ' DATE EXP H __: ss 21) R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH-.INS/APR-92 R : GUARDIAN DENTAL :;CITY HEALTH-INS/APR-92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY. HEALTH -INS/APR-92 02623 143-400-3403-4188 00443 $1.41 04/01/92 ----------- -- -----. BUS PASS SUBSDY-/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS---- --- 02623 160-400-3102-4188 01237 $17.31 04/01/92--- SEWER/ST-DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 170-400-2103-4188 00249 $23.52 04/01/92- --- -..--_-..._._... -SPEC --INVESTGTNS--(/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ------1 2 00001' 40408 - $0.00 -- 04/02/92 00001 40408 $0:00 ---04/02/92- 00001 0:00-04f02/92- 00001 40408 $0.00-04/02/92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 CITY HEALTH-INS/APR-92 04/01492 R GUARDIAN DENTAL -- CITY -HEALTH INS/APR-92 705-400-1209-4188 00548 $29.92 LIABILITY-INS-----/PMPLOYEE-BENEF-ITS 02623 705-400-1217-4188 00606 $44.88 04/01/92-- ------WORKERS-COMP----/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS- *** VENDOR TOTAL******#+r*********-n-x**************sHr*******************n************* 53, 300. 34 00001 40408 $0.00---04/02/92 00001 40408 $0.00 -- 04/02/92 R HAINES AND COMPANY 00878 001-400-2101-4305 01739 $641.16 56-00080/27452 04132 ST. DIRECTORIES/POLICE--27452---04/05/92---------- _.---_-POLICE----------/OFFICE- OPER-SUPPLIES $641.16 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************* -x****************** -n*********************** 2:. F to rw1 40 0 41 46 $641.16 R HEALTHNET ---CITY HEALTH R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH. R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/APR-92 INS/APR--92 INS/APR-92 •INS/APR-92 INS/APR•92- -- INS/APR-92- I NS/APR • • 92 NS/APR-92-INS/APR••92--------.- 00241 001-400-1212-4188 02353 $16,827.38 04/01/92----------- • EMP BENEFITS ----/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS-------- 00241 ENEFITS--------.- 00241 103-400-2601-4188 01268 $773.35 04/01/92 -- STREET LIGHTING -/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -- 00241 109-400-3301-4188 00256 04/01/92 _ -- - ---- VEH PKG--DIST -- 00241 110-400-3302-4188 01526 04/01/92- - -- PARKING ENF--- 00241 145-400-3401-4189 01276 04/01/92-- DIAL A RIDE ------ 00241 145-400-3402-4188 01263 04/01/92 ._._.. ..._. ESEA --- $66. 12 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2,232.98 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -------- $79.78 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS-- $11.28 ENEFITS---- $11.28 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS--------- 00241 ENEFITS---------- 00241 145-400-3408-4188 00083 $3.78 04/01 /92--.-- - -- .-- -- - - -COMMUTER - XPRESS-/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -- J 40409 04/02/92 00016 40410 $0.00 -- 04/02/92 00016 40410 $0.00 -04/02/92 ., 00016 40410 $0.00 04/02/92 00016 40410 $0.00 -04/02/92. II IU I1 4 00016 40410 4 $0.00 04/02/92 00016 $0.00 40410 04/02/92 00016 40410 $0.00 04/02/92 6 • 6 434 .,. FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:00:51 �3n 4 ,gyp 1•'`; .I I a 1•py�;.1,{407", . .41;..,-.1If CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/02/92 t I i �, �Ff I Y �.: jar :��7�P Y, ,� .1 - PAGE 0008 DATE 04/02/92 PAY \VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION O O II 13 14 IS ® 11 11, VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH.. INS/APR_92 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH_INS/APR--92 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92_ R HEALTHNET INV/REF PO # CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 5 6 00241 155-400-2102-4188 00783 $66.12 00016 40410 04/01/92 - CROSSING -GUARD --/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS------ ---- $0.00-04/02/924 00241 160-400-3102-4188 01241 $529.12 04/01192 SEWER/ST-DRAIN—/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00241 170-400-2103-4188 09252 $688.03 04/01/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS-1EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS 00241 705-400-1209-4188 00551 $159.80 CITY..HEALTH_INS/APR-92 04/01/92 --- ----LIABILITY-INS----/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R HEALTHNET _ CITY HEALTH.INS/APR 92 *** VENDOR 0 .• 1 O 0 C) 26 47 00241 705-400-1217-4188 00610 $186.22 04/01/92— - -- ..--__._. WORKERS -COMP -----/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TOTAL******************************************************•*****•********* R INDEPENDENT CITIES RISK __EXCESS WORK -COMP PREMIUM $21, 623.96 00016 40410 11 *0,00-04/02/92-1i 00016 40410 $0.00---04/02/92 • 00016 40410 $0.00-04/02/92- 00241 0.00--04/02/92- 14 15 17 0 • • • 00016 40410 1. $0. 00 --04/02/92.r 11° a 01484 705-400-1217-4201 00142 $2,383.00 -03/24/92------------WORKERS-COMP---/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT---- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,383.00 04610 40411 - $0.00 -04/02/92 • {3,..,11 32 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC DISCOUNT OFFERED R I INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC -.-_DISCOUNT-..TAKEN ----. ...... 4a 641 45 111.47 41. p R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92. R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC MISC..-CHARGES/MAR-92 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC - MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92 - 02458 001-202-0000-2021 00176 $13.49 03/31/92-- .. ..........._.--..----_-. ----•------.._.__ —DISCOUNTS OFFERED ----- 02458 001-202-0000-2022 00172 $13.49CR 03/31/92 -/DISCOUNTS TAKEN 02458 001-400-4204-4309 02295 $22.60 03/31/92------ - -_- BLDG MAINT ----MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ----- 02458 001-400-4204-4321 00644 $350.72 03/31/92--------- -- --BLDG MAINT-- ---/BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT— ------ 02458 105-400-2601-4309 00798 $288.56 03/31/92-- - STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $661.88 R INTERNATIONAL CONF OF BUILDING 00667 001-400-4201-4316 00288 $285.00 SEMINAR REG/C, SWARTZ 18404 03/23/92- BUILDING- /TRAINING 00337 40412 -$0.00-- 04/02/92- 00337 4/02/92- 00337 40412 $0. 00- - --- 04/02/92- -"0 4/02/92- 00337 40412 $0. 00 04/02/92 00337 40412 - $0.00- -04/02/92 00337 40412 - $0.00 04/02/92 E18404 02261 40413 •$285.00 04/02/92 I 4�I I w I'‘ • • O O o 3 4 FINANCE-SFA34O TIME 14:'00:51 - PAY VENDOR N- AME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/02/92 PAGE 0009 DATE 04/02/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4 CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ,ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 0 9 *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************************** *** *285.00 R DET. LANCE*JAAK0LA' 02137 001-400-2101-4312 01885 $31.20 04512 40414 'REIMB -MILES/POST--CLASC -03/30/92— POLICE /TRAVEL --EXPENSE- -POST $0:00--04/02/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************44***************************************i+********** $31.20 ,4 to „ 21 R JOHN*KEARIN 01032 001-400-2101-4312 01886*136.24 04513 40415 REIMB MILES/POST-CLASS- 03/30/9?_-- POLICE —/TRAVEL---EXPENSE--I-POST-- --- --30.00--04/02/92- 2 1 4/02/92- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 26i JO 32 $136.24 R KNOTT'S BERRY FARM 01662 001-400-4601-4201 01280 $298.50 734239 03744 40416 COMM RES EXCURSION 34239 03/26/92- - ---- COMM RESOURCES ---/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *319.15 - 04/02/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $298.50 R LIEEERT, CASSIDY &. FRIERSON 02175 001-400-1203-4201 00908 $481.25 LEGAL SERVICES/FEB-92 02/29/92— - PERSONNEL------ /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $481.25 2 6 4* 4 i - 4* 04611 40417 -$0.00-04/02/92-, R COUNTY OF*LOS ANGELES 03673 001-400-2101-4251 00433 $13.01 152 04153 40418 AUTOPSY REPORT/POLICE ---152 03/17/92 POLICE - - --/CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT - $0.00 - 04/02/92 34 3, 3b 3- w 41 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $13:01 R DIANNE*LOUGHIN 03628 001-400-2101-4316 00877 $163.35 TR395 04152 40419 REIMB TRAVEL EXPENSE--TR395 03/26/92 POLICE----- -- ---/TRAINING -- - - - $0.00 --04/02/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $163.35 R MANERI SIGN CO., INC. 01255 001-400-6101-4309 01213 $73.61 6141 -IN 03689 40420 ALUMINUM STREET-SIGNS------41-IN 03/12/92-- - ------ --- PARKS-------- - •--- /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - $73.61 - 04/02/92';, *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $73.61 R MYERS STEVENS & COMPANY 00091 001-400-1212-4188 02347 *772.20 00013 40421 ------CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92 04/01/92-------- --- EMP BENEFITS ----/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS------ $0.00 04/02/92 4* t•m- w+r �•,'Rv�'^ .6,fye, ,..+.r . 1. • f k t 4• 'k.'; q16. ,/1 1'(1,{}}r tfIg•"...'• �flf:ffl�Fr !^Iv: tiff ?tlr.{ rit9 • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:Q0:31 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/02/92 PAY ENDOR NAME ESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE INVC PROJ PAGE 0010 DATE 04/02/92 TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO *, CHK * AMOUNT UNENC 'DATE EXP ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 6 1U • II *** VENDOR TOTAL ********** -*************************************•*a•*-****************** *772.20 R NATIONAL HOME LIFE 03465 001-400-1212-4188 02342 $80.00 e14 14 o I: O a' .4 ® 26 z. 20 • xl 31 e u • ,. ]9 4J 11'41 42 43 46 '47 49 4.I SI 153 54 SS 56 y 00065 40422 CITY HEALTH_-INS/APR_92 04/01192 EMP BENEFITS----.-/EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS $0.00=04/02/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL $80.00 IL 16 I, R PACIFIC EQUIP & IRRIGATION 00406 110-400-3302-4311 00774 ' $100.94 52263/53966 03364 40423 CUSHMAN_PARIS 53966 03/20192 PARKING-ENF---/AUTO--MAINTENANCE $100.94 04/02/-92- -*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100.94 R PACTEL CELLULAR - LA 03209 170-400-2103-4304 00044 $1,709.30 00353 40424 MOBILE PHONE_ CHGS/MAR -92 O3/31/92_.._... SPEC - INVESTGTNS-/TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,709.30 *0.00 —04/02/92--• R PARKHOUSE TIRE, INC. 03414 001-400-3103-4311 00744 $398.30 153500 04811 40425 ELGIN_SWEEPER--TIRES 13500------03/27t92 ST MAINTENANCE —/AUTO -MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $398.30 $398.30---04/02/92- R 398.30--04/02/92- R PENMAR ENTERPRISES 01768 001-202-0000-2021 00175 *6.44 00021411 04814 40426 DISCOUNT OFFERED -.--.--21411 -03/25/92-- ---- ----- DISCOUNTSOFFERED- -- $0.00---04/02/92 R PENMAR ENTERPRISES 01768 001-202-0000-2022 00171 $6.44CR 00021411 04814 40426 DISCOUNT_TAKEN___ 21431 -03/25/92--.--_-.-- -.------.----. - .----..--___/DISCOUNTS TAKEN..---- ---- $0.00---- 04/02/92 R PENMAR ENTERPRISES 01768 001-400-6101-4309 01212 $637.65 00021411 04814 40426 a TRASH BAG LINERS 21411------03/25/92- -PARKS-----------/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS--- -- $644.09-- 04/02/92 • • I• • . • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *637.65 R POSTAGE ON CALL 04091 001-400-1208-4305 01058 $2,008.00 51697214 08064 40427 POSTAGE METER- RESET- 97214 - 03/30/92--------- - -. - GEN APPROP - ----/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES-- -- - - *0.00 -04/02/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2.008.00 R PROF COMMUNICATIONS INSTALLERS '02526 001-400-2101-4311 01392 $300.00 732/734 00357 40428 MISC. CHARGES/MAR .92- 2/734 03/31/92- ___________POLICE ----/AUTO-MAINTENANCE *0.00 -- -04/02/92 • • y 011.15 O 3 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:00:51 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/02/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # • AMOUNT DATE INVC = PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0011 DATE 04/02/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP% *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************-**********-******************************* G 0 9 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO 'MISC.--CHARGES/FINAL BILL $300. 00 00173 001-400-2101-4306 01151 $401.05 02/29/92, -------POLICE -/PRISONER MAINTENANCE RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO ' 00173 001-400-2201-4305 60547 $268.81 ----------MISC. CHARGES/FINAL BILL -----------02/29/92- --- FIRE • - --- /OFFICE- OPER-SUPPLIES---- i --- R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO MISC- CHARGES/FINAL BILL 02/29/92 - - PLANNINQ- /OFFICE•OPER-SUPPLIES 00173 001-400-4101-4305 00612 $60.14 *** VENDOR TOTAL*-u-u******-ir**-n*-n*******-n***-n*********-n**********************-n**-n***** 23 241 20 27 R MARIA LUISA*ROCHA REIMB TOWING FEES R MARIA LUISA*ROCHA - REIMB TOWING FEES $730.00 04590 001-300-0000-3841 00403 $35.00 03/26/92 -- - /POLICE TOWING 04590 001-400-2101-4201 00992 $70.00 03/26/92 POLICE- /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT--- *** VENDOR TOTAL ********** -n******************************* -n*********** -n************* 23 30 32 31 34 34 334 39 $105. 00 00259 40429 $0. 00--04/02/92-- 00259 40429 --- $0. 00---04/02/92 00259 40429 $0.00-04/02/92- 04150 40430 $0.00 -- 04/02/92- 3 4 7 11 g 4 • 04150 40430 --$0.00- 04/02/92 . R SYLVIA*ROOT SEC SERV/3-17-92 04061 001-400-4102-4201 00351 $186.25 317---03/23/92--- ---- PLANNING-COMM---/CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT-• - *** VENDOR TOTAL*-•****************************************************************** R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES TRAFFIC ENG SERV/FEB 92-92140 $186.25 317 01973 40431 - $0.00 04/02/92 01578 001-400-3104-4201 00118 $812.50 92140 04808 02/29/92 ----- - - --- TRAFFIC--SAFETY---/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $812.50 40 42 4. 414" 44 40 • • • • 47 :c 51 .`I R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS - CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92 04398 001-400-1212-4188 02343 $833.22 04/01/92- EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04396 105-400-2601-4188 01263 $72.79 04/01/92 - STREET LIGHTING -/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -- SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 109-400-3301-4188 00251 $7.19 -------- - CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92 04/01/92-- --------VEH PKG• DIST --/EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS 40432 I 04/02/92. 00019 40433 $0.00 04/02/92 1 • 00019 40433 • $0.00 - 04/02/92 00019 40433 $0.00 - 04/02/92 I c t+: .0,111%., :�:.It�.tle �'. ,. t'lr.. 1f�•.!tl I `,.�. -„' �'�C.{i`''�tki'r9 �14�� i�", Y�, iii [r J;c!a Mf'tl�ia�'1.J1 ��� 6�t�`! +!1�V�'h''y t.' 4 i(: 14 • ° FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:00:51 PAY iENDOR NAME ESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/02/92 PAGE 0012 DATE 04/02/92 VND 4F ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN t! AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY. HEALTH INS/APR. 92 :- 0 16 1/ •') 0 • YI .SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTkLINS/APR_.92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS HEALTH INS/APR._92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY. HEALTH_.INS/APR_92 INV/REF PO *j CHK tP AMOUNT UNENC I•DATE EXP 04398 110-400-3302-4188 01519 $250.17 04/01/92______.___ _____.._.._PARKING_ENF.__._/EMpLOYEE BENEFITS R 04398 145-400-3401-4188 01269' $6.89 . 04/01L92- DIAL--A-RIDE- EMPLOYEE --BENEFITS 04398 145-400-3402-4188 01257 $0.33 04/01/92._ _________ 04398 145-400-3408-4188 00081 $0.33 04/01/92- - COMMUTER-XPRESS_/EMPLOYEE..BENEFITS---------.---- R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS __CITY HEALTH. INS/APR.92._ R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/APR.92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY _HEALTH INS/APR 92 SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY.. HEALTH . INS/APR_92 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************** JI L ,4 ,6 „ )•) 04398 155-400-2102-4188 00778 $5.63 CROSSING GUARD --/EMPLOYEE. BENEFITS 04398 160-400-3102-4188 01235 $41.39 04/01192--.--.-.--.._ .._.._ SEWER/ST DRAIN --/EMPLOYEE DENEFITS---------------.--- 04398 170-400-2103-4188 00247 $61.17 04/01/93-..--.-- __._____. SPEC- INVESTGTNS-/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 04398 705-400-1217-4188 00603 $2.82 04/01492 WORKERS -COMP -/EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS *************prat*********•*#####*#####******-tt#•n******#** $1,281.93 R SO CAL MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC 04589 001-400-4601-4315 00099 $15.00 ANNUAL- DUES/ESSLINGER----- --6722 03/24/92-- ---- -. -. -. COMM RESOURCES -/MEMBERSHIP--- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $15.00 41, 41 41. 2 00019 ' 40433 II 7 $0.00.---.04/02/92 y- 00019 40433 $0.00---04/02/92H 04398 0.00-04102/92- 00019 40433 .$0.00-04/02/92 00019 40433 $0.00---04/02/92 00019 40433 *p.m) --04/02/92 00019 40433 -$0.00---04/02/92- 00019 $0.00-04/02/92- 00019 40433 $0.00 ---04/02/92 00019 40433 $0.00---04/02/92 IU I1 19 • • • r • 6722 03787 40434 1:1r, -- $0. 00----04/02/92- ,1 R SOURISSEAU SUPPORT SERVICES 02075 001-400-2101-4201 00994 *726.25 2055/2057 04149 BACKGROUND .INVESTIGATION -/2057 03/26/ -92 ---.----.------.-.POLICE----- ---/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ....- • - -$0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** .36 47 4 • 51 R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL BLOOD ALCOHOL TESTING $726.25 2. 00107 001-400-2101-4201 00993 $100.50 03/26/92- - ---- -- POLICE ----- -----/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT-- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY NOTICING AND ---PUBLIC NOTICING/MAR--92 -ER03B $100. 50 40435 04/02/92 04155 40436 $0.00 04/02/92 03882 001-400-1121-4323 00186 $230.00 92HER03B 00364 40437 03/31/92 CITY-CLERK------/PUBLIC-NOTICING-------- -- - $0.00----04/02/92 , 55 1 r 1 1 Y 0 110 DESCRIPTION II 5 ------ - ----PUBLIC NOTICING/MAR-.92----ER03C FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14: 0:51 PAY VENDOR NAME • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/02/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ,;ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R SOUTH BAY NOTICING AND 0 9 PAGE 0013 DATE 04/02/92 INV/REF PO #K CHK # AMOUNT UNENC 'DATE EXP 2 4 03882 001-400-4101-4201 00142 $690.00 92HERO3C 00364 40437 03/31/92------------ PLANNING------/CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT - $0.00--04/02/92- *** VENDOR TOTAL ************-*-n•r-»*•x•x*•r-n•x********•n*•n*•n*#- ***•r•n*-nor****•n•>F**-a********•r** $920. 00 ,J • 14 I1: O 1. • 0 -77 .• 26 27 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL - CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH-INS/APR--92 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL ----CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92-- 00240 001-400-1212-4188 0.2345 $246.80 04/01/92 EMP- BENEFITS ----/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS-------' 00240 145-400-3401-4188 01271 $0.94 04/01/92 - =--- - -- - DIAL- A --RIDE- -/EMPLOYEE-- BENEFITS R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL -CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92 - 00240 145-400-3402-4188 04/01/92 --- ESEA 01259 $0. 38 -/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 00240 705-400-1209-4188 00547 04/01/92 LIABILITY INS -- $3.17 --/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS --- 00240 705-400-1217-4188 00605 -- - 04/01/92----- -- - - WORKERS COMP - $3.17 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS--- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $254.46 1., 4J M 45 5.4 00029 40438 $0.00 --04/02/92 00029 40438 $0.-00--04/02/92- 00029 40438 $0.00' -04/02/92 00029 40438 $0.00-04/02/92 00029 40438 $0.00 - 04/02/92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 001-400-1212-4188 02344 $2,118.89 CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92 --- ---- - -----04/01/92-- --- -- -- EMP BENEFITS ----/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS------------- UNUM ENEFITS---------- ------- UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY-HEALTH.-INS/APR .92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. - CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92--------- - R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/APR--92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY --- CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92 -- 03790 105-400-2601-4188 01264 $77.05 04/01/92- -- - --- STREET -LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE -BENEFITS 03790 109-400-3301-4188 00252 $9.00 04/01/92- - ----- VEH PKG DIST ---/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - ---------- 03790 -------- 03790 110-400-3302-4188 01520 $385.23 04/01/92- - - PARKING ENF------/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INS. 03790 145-400-3401-4188 01270 $13.29 -- - 04/01/92--- - ------DIAL A RIDE ----/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -- UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92 -- R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. --CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92- 03790 145-400-3402-4188 01258 *1.66 04/01/92- ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 145-400-3403-4188 00442 $1.37 04/01/92----- --- -- -- --- BUS-PASS-SUBSDY-/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ------ 1 00022 40439 $0. 00 -- 04/02/92 a.: l 0 ,.t • 00022 40439 $0.00--04/02/92- 00022 40439 -$0.00 ---04/02/92- 00022 40439 - $0.00 04/02/92 00022 40439 i' $0.00 04/02/92 00022 40439 • $0. 00 --- 04/02/92 00022 40439 $0.00 04/02/92 5 i 9. 0 0 1r "r�•e-�"' �•, lifla ,e,:,rrr- r p . 117., r... ,.,.ylr., �q.,l� 1 :eMlrip; FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:00:51 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/02/92 PAGE 0014 DATE 04/02/92 I • • 6 • u PAY ENDOR NAME ESCRIPTION ' II 1!. 16 ' 17 ' :0 21 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY. HEALTH INS/APR 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. C 'TY HEALTH.. INS/APR -92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY CITY HEALTH INS/APR 92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC fDATE EXP 03790 145-400-3408-4188 00082 $0.76 04/01192— __—_.__ __ . COMMUTER- .XPRESS_/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS__ 03790 155-400-2102-4188 00779 $6.00 04/01/92 CROSSING -GUARD ---/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INS. 03790 160-400-3102-4188 04236 $60.60 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH_INS/APR_9? R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY CITY HEALTH INS/APR.92_... 04/011.92 SEWER/ST DRAIN -_-/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 705-400-1209-4188 00546 $18.61 04/01192— LIABILITY-INS----/EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS INS. 03790 705-400-1217-4188 00604 $26.41 —...._.._-,.04/01/92 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** I .. ' 26 27 26 ' -1 • 12 a a R USW/PSG/NUG _.ANNUAL. DUES/V.. ELLEDGE 03949 001-400-2101-4315 03/26/92----.---..__-._- POLICE $2, 718. 87 00214 $100.00 -I -MEMBERSHIP ---- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100. 00 4 II 00022 ' 40439 67 $0. 00--- 04/02/92-8 00022 40439 $0.00,----04/02/92 00022 40439 -$0. 00 —04/02192 11 13 14 I6 00022 40439 $0. 00-04/02/92 • 00022 40439 - $0.00 -04/02/92 04154 40440 $0.00-04/02/92 110 • • 0 r • • .,Li 0 *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $76.673.48 *** TOTAL WARRANTS****************************************************************** !, 39 $90. 680. 48 .I 42 41 44 46 • 4 • 46 41. 50 5, 54 56 \7 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAI S COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PTO INCLUSIVE, OF THE WARRANT REGISTER FOR a` ARE ACCURATE. _ -- FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE ANCE TO TrE DGET. BY FINANCE DIIf'-CTOR DATE �9-, —� • 4.I I. I • 1 • is V V 1' 0 Ir 8 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 14:20:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/09/92, PAGE 0001 DATE 04/09/92 �► �►17 `r PAY VENDOR NAME ,.- VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER' TRN # '' AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD # ,ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 3 s 6 • R AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 00854 001-400-4101-4315 00177 $216.00 053554 01974 40444 53554 04L01197 PLANNING IMEMBERSHIR $Q.-00 04/09/92 5 6 7 6 9 11 12 ) 9 _DUESLK—ROBER.LSON *** VENDOR TOTAL ***********iota►ac•xit*ata►stit�►iti►iFit�titiF•»atititat*atiFatirata►****atiiaruititif****ar****i►iti *** ..'., a. .,. $216. 00 10 11 R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00857 001-400-2101-4306 01157 $107.20 6897 00045 40445 PRISONER_MEALSL__APR1L_92._.6897 04L07192 POLICE /PRISONER_MAINTENANCE $0 00- 04/09/92 14 15 16 15 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $107.20 17 19 20 15 ia R BONNIE*ATLAS 04594 110-300-0000-3302 44989 $20.00 2702998 04709 40446 CITATION_REEUND 0299P 04102192 /COURT—FINES/PARKING 21 22 23 26 27 28 15 21 $0 00 —04/091-92- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.00 > .. .+ ... ` 22 73 2A R BANC ONE LEASING 99 02154 001-400-4205-6900 00108 $417.96 00030 40447 LEASE_EAYMENILAPRIL_92 03/27192 EQUIP—SERV-IC AYMENTS $0.00 29 30 31 z5 26 27 04/09/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL***at************************�t*************************************** . •:.$417.96 33 34 35 2337 30 R BERIAN PRINTING SERVICE. INC. 02664 001-400-4202-4305 00687 $43.30 3366 04809 40448 BUSINFSG CARDS/C MALONE 3366 03/-19/92 PUB—WKS—ADMIN---/OFFICE—OPER—SUPPLIES 38 39 40 al 42 43 31 32 3 $43. 30 04J.,:9: �2 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $43.30 Y1 .v, R OFCR DAVID*BOHACIK 01983 001-400-2101-4312 01891 $27.00 04525 40449 MEALS/POST—CLASS 04/06/92 SCE /TRAVEL—EXPENSE—,.—POST ne ,09 45 47 49 49 0 551 52 37 39 $0 0 92 - ' • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** er $27.00 40 41 '2 R BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 00163 001-400-2101-4306 01155 $273.74 070664 00310 40450 MLSC_—CHARGES/MARCK 2-70664 03/31493- POLICE /PRISONER—MAINTENANCE 53 54 55 m 9 4' 45 $0 00- 04/09/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $273.74••, y. " 47 4i LEONARD W.*BR0CK 04592 001-400-1101-4201 00076 $941.80' 02143 40451 PROF .SERV/O.LL_RECOVERY 04/06192 420001—CITY—COUNCIL /CONTRACT—SERVICE/PR/VAT 62 63 6 66 67 49 50 51 . 80. QO 04/09/92 v''' .z , $ '. .'7 .. %s ..-. < Af .. K . ;. i 8 .. , F x tl +.' x 5 '- e 52 53 54• 69 70 71 72 55 y:a F cF.;` w < g5 S ® ws d 4' F. a s-< v Ire J'^- _ .. �1 .t _ < 7] )5 1 ) ..y J et ..i .JY r FINANCE-SFA340 0 TIME 14:20:49 0I`I • •I i •�.�� •.. I., CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/09/92. PAY VENDOR NAME VND # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PAGE 0002 DATE 04/09/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL *********************•n**. **********•u*•u**►***************-n*********•n•* $941.80 R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00155 - --TRASH-PICKUP%MARCH 92 20300 04/-01-/92 R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00155 TRASH PICKUP/ MARCH -92. 20300- 04/01 /92 001-400-1208-4201 00860 $578.37 920300 GEN APPROF' /-CONTR.ACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT--- - --- - 109-400-3301-4201 00112 $516.63 920300 VEH PKG-DbST-----/CONTRACT--SERVICE/PRIVAT --- — *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1, 095.00 • 0 f, '4 00005 40452 • $0.-00----04/09/92- 00005 0:;09---04/09,92- 00005 40452 - $0.-00-04/09/92- 4 0 , •19 R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00158 001-400-3103-4201 00395 $2,284.56 37002 00004 40453 --- DUMP CHARGES./MARCH-92- 37002 ---Q3/31/92 ST MAINTENANCE —/CONTRACT --SERVICE/PRIVAT - $0. 00 --04/09/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY- CASH -3/24-4/2/92 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER -----------PETTY-CASH-3/24-4/2/92 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY -CASH -3/24-4/2/92 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER — PETTY CASH -3/24-4/2/92 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER ----PETTY-CASH-3/24-4/2/92 . 41H' R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 11•• I: r---.--_----_- — PETTY CASH -3/24-4/2/92 L.: • R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY -CASH -3/24-4/2/92 $2,284.56 02016 001-400-1203-4305 00344 $24.29 04/02/92 PERSONNEL . /OFFICE -OPER --SUPPLIES 02016 001-400-1205-4305 00120 $23.71 04/02/92 CABLE -TV — --/OFFICE-OPER-SUPPLIES 02016 001-400-2201-4305 04/02/92 FIRE 02016 04/02/92- 02016 04/02/92 02016 04/02/92 001-400-2201-4309 FIRE ---- 00549 $8. 11 —/OFFI-CE-OPER-SUPPLIES 21 22 23 24 25 24 22 03850 40454 $0. 00---04/09/92- 03850 40454 - -$0:00-04/09/92- 03850 $0:00-04/09f92- 01278 $9. 58 -/MAINTENANCE- MATERIALS 001-400-4601-4305 01044 $11.67 COMM RESOURCES --/OFFICE-OPER SUPPLIES 001-400-4601-4308 00667 $17.71 COMM RESOURCES --/PROGRAM MATERIALS — --- - 02016 001-400-6101-4309 04/02/92 -- PARKS --- 03850 40454 $0-00-04/09/92, ,n 25 30 33 34 35 l5 3n 39 03850 40454 $0.00 ---04/09/92 • • 23 le 4 44 43 u, 03850 40454 4' $0.00 04/09/92 52 51 54 AhL ss Imp sf 111, i9 C/) 41 4, 4, 111 44 Z'e 4S ,1 49 70 03850 40454 $0. 00 —04/09/92- 01218 $38.52 03850 40454 /MAINTENANCE --MATER IALS----------- $0.00-04109/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $133.59 R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY 00034 001-400-1208-4305 01060 $1,091.44 RECEIPT-BOOKS/STOCK 83956—L-03/20/92 GEN APPROP---/OFFICEOPER-SUPPLIES 183956 04701 40455 $992.- 22----04/09/92 . .1 • 57 74 7 • 0 f." 0 0 0 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:20:49 CITY OF HERMQSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/09/921 PAGE 0003 DATE 04/09/92 VENDOR NAME .,.,., „ ACCOUNT NiJMUMtc !MN if A UUNT INV/REF PO # CHK * DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 41' z *** VENDOR TOTAL +t tura►ituxunatatrratnppuattF+t*at*narn*ttatatatnaatuuatuitnarat*atuatatntFatat3aa►tf*atuatetni► $1,091,44 44 '' 6 ; R CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICIALS 00411 001-400-4201-4315 00113 $115.00 04214 40436 ANNUAL _DUES/W-_GROVE —04/06/92 BUILDING- /MEMBERSHIP-------------------- $0.-00----04/09/92-', ' *** VENDOR TOTAL atatatat*at•ratatat*at*•rat•r*at*ar•rar•rat•r•stat-rata/•r*atat•r•ratat•rat•r•rat**atat*;tartar•rat*•r*atatatat•r•r•rat*ar $115.00 15 0'.: R CARE STATION 03972 705-400-1217-4182 00224 $482.00 04613 40457 , .-- EMP__MED_-EXAMS/MAR-9? ,o '6 1 '' LE 03430/92 WORKERS-COMP---/WORKERS-COMP-CURRENT-YR--------------30. 00--04/09/92-' *** VENDOR TOTAL a Fatatatatatatatatatatarratatat*atatat*arrataatatat#•rafatatatatatawtatatatarr• ataratat•ratatatarratarr•ratat•raHtatatatat $482.00 21 2222 R JEANNE*CARUSO 03293 001-400-2101-4312 01895 $21.84 04516 40458 MILEAGE/POST CLASS )4 )5 )5 ), I;: I• 04/02/92-- --POLICE ----------/-TRAVEL-•-EXPENSE-t--POST-----------------$0.0o--04/09/92- q R 5JEANNE*CARU5O 03293 001-400-2101-4316 00883 $88.87 04162 40458 3.1 ------------REIMB_MATERIALS/SP.-92 04/06492— I:� POLICE— , /TRAINING $0:-0O--04/-09/92 ' 'SI`' *** VENDOR TOTAL *************rra***a*a*t***a****tam**rrt*r*r********r**a*t*a*******a$110.71 35 R CAVENAUGH AND ASSOCIATES 04597 001-400-2101-4312 01900 $200.00 04515 40459 " TUITION/S--HARTT 04/01 — /92 POLICE /TRAVEL -EXPENSE -,--POST *0.00 ' ,, e1/091-92- *** VENDOR TOTAL***************at*•r***ar*at****at****at***at**at****************at*r******** $200.00 4 42 as 451 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-2101-4311 01396 $83.23 185268 00313 40460 Q7' MISC__CHARGES/MARCH 92—B5268 04/01-.492 POLICE 1AUTO--MAINTENANCE— .5 ,j —$0._00 04/09A92—'" ' *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $83.23 5, 52 4 51 R CINTAS CORPORATION 00153 001-400-4202-4187 00198 $618.55 00002 40461 5`1 UNIFORM-RENTAL/MARCH-92 03/311-92— PUB-WKS-ADMIN--/UNIFORM-ALLOWANCE ---- -$0.00----04109192- R CINTAS CORPORATION 00153 110-400-3302-4187 00333 $52.50 00002 40461 --------UNIFORM RENTAL/MARCH-92 03/31/92-- 47 ----------- PARK ING-- ENF----- /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $0.00 01/09/92 - 6° *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $671.05 5,4 G4 4J s, R CLEARS TRAINING CONFERENCE 01510 001-400-2101-4316 00882 *125.00 TR401 00401 40462 6' CONF. REG/ELLEDGE z TR401 - 04/09192 POLICE ---/TRAINING' $a. 00 o41a9/92 �; 72 )) , ^� �J • 40 a 0 • a • • •,' • • • •I r,' *:< • 0 O • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:20:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/09/92 PAGE 0004 DATE 04/09/92 IMT V C41JU c ,' rlt VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN :t AMOUNT INV/REF PO tt CHK St DESCRIPTION DATE•INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 2 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************-********-**************************** $125.00 R COAST IRRIGATION CO. 00354 001-202-0000-2021 00179 $7.22 31418 04810 40463 -- -- DISCOUNT --OFFERED 31-418 03/24/92 9 0 DISCOUNTS -OFFERED -- - - ----- $0.00 ---04/09/92 R COAST IRRIGATION CO. 00354 001-202-0000-2022 00175 $7.22CR 31418 04810 40463 -------------- DISCOUNT -TAKEN- 31418 03/24/92 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN- - - -- - $0.00-04/09/92-7, R COAST IRRIGATION CO. 00354 001-400-6101-4309 01216 $353.77 31418 04810 40463 PARTS/VALLEY-PARK-HYDRO-31418 '6 04/09/92 PARKS--- -/MAINTENANCE--MATERIALS------- -- $360.98 04/09/92-'1 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $353.77 _1 26 R THE*DAILY BREEZE 00642 001-400-1203-4201 00910 $119.49 392205-100 00318 40464 2' ------ --- - - EMPLOYMENT-ADS/MARCH-92--5-100 --03/31-/92 --- - PERSONNEL -'/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT' $O. 0004/09/92 2 30 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $119.49 31 33 34 R DAPPER TIRE CO. 01390 110-400-3302-4311 00776 $350.77 00319 40465 ' -------------- MISC.-CHARGES/MARCH-92- 03/31/92 PARKING-ENF /AUTO -MAINTENANCE ----- -'-------- $0.00-04/09/92-S 3.1 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $350.77 40 41 42 R THE *DEVELOPMENT 00147 001-400-2101-4305 01741 $69.18 1015 00320 40466 41 ------------------•- MISCO--CHARGES/MARCH-92--1015 03/31/92 -- -- - - POLICE--- ----/OFFICE OPER-SUPPLIES------ ---$0. 0004/09/92-meq R THE *DEVELOPMENT 00147 001-400-2101-4306 01156 $100.05 1015 00320 40466 41 1-015------03/311-92---------POLICE -------- -MISC.--CHARGES/MARCH--92 /PRISONER -MAINTENANCE -------- $0.0004/09192-,,T, R THE *DEVELOPMENT 00147 001-400-4201-4305 00755 $3.93 1015 00320 40466 5 ----------------MISC:- CHARGES/MARCH 92-1015 03/31/92 -1 BUILDING'-- --/OFFICE OPER 'SUPPLIES - $0. 00-04/09/92-,-- 54 R THE *DEVELOPMENT 00147 001-400-4601-4305 01045 $0.36 1015 00320 40466 ------------MISC.--CHARGES/MARCH--92 101-5 03/31/-92 COMM -RESOURCES- /OFFICE -OPER -SUPPLIES -- --$0:00 04/09/92- ,. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $173.52 9 61 R DIVE N' SURF 00604 001-400-2201-4309 01279 $20.00 045742 00321 40467 E3 - --MISC.- -CHARGES/MARCH-92_-45742 -03/19.192 FIRE /MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS $0. 0 -04/09-/-92-- C1 : 4 ], 13 6 74 75 175/ O a a 0 0 d r 11 • • r e 0 O 0 rr F I PRANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:20:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/09/92 r S.. PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER. TRN 4 AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0005 DATE 04/09/92 INV/REF PO * CHK 4 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************. **** ►****-x-x** ****•x*****•x*-»*******•n-n* $2000 u s. R EASY READER 00181 PUB.- NOT.IC-ING/MARCH-92 -0268 173/26492 2 3 6 7 001-400-1121-4323 00188 $387.82 0268 00326 40468 11 Ir CITY CLERK---- /PUBL-IC-NOTICING---------_--. --- --._ . -.._.40. 00-0 /09/92-13 ti 11/ *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** J17 sI $387.82 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS DISCOUNT OFFERED 225n 00165 ` 001-202-0000-2021 00182 $43.79 03/-31492 —DISCOUNTS -OFFERED R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-202-0000-2022 ____DISCOUNT_TAKEN 2250 03/31/92_ • 4R 51 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS - MISC. __CHARGES/MARCH_92__.2250 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC_._CHARGESLMARCH-92 2250 00165 001-400-2101-4311 03/31/92 ----__-- POLICE I6 2250 00327 40469 $0.00 Q4/09492- 00178 $43.79CR 2250 --/DISCOUNTS TAKEN 01397 $556.64 -JAUTO-MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-3101-4311 00038 03/31.L92 .MEDIANS R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 $89.35 /AUTO -MAINTENANCE 00327 40469 -$0.00---04/09/92 2250 $0.00--04/09/92 2250 00327 40469 -$0.00 04/09/92- 2250 00327 40469 $0.00 01/09192- 001-400-3103-4309 1/09/92 001-400-3103-4309 01336 $27.44 2250 MISC CHARGES/MARCH-92 2250_____ 03/31492 ST-MAINTENANCE—/MAINTENANCE--MATERIALS R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-3103-4311 00748 $192.83 —.MISC.-CHARGES/MARCH 92_--__2250 03/31492 -- ST -MAINTENANCE --/AUTO-MAINTENANCE R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 CHARGES/MARCH--92--2250 -03/31-492 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS -MISC.__ CHARGES/MARCH--92 2250 001-400-3104-4311 00099 - - - --- TRAFFIC-SAFETY- 00165 RAFFIC-SAFETY.. 00165 001-400-4201-4311 00282 03/31.92 BUILDING - R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS , 00165 MISC—CHARGES/MARCH-92----2250 €3131-,t.92 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC.CHARGES/MARCH 92 2250 00327 40469 $0.-00 01/09/-92 19 0 2n 21 s 22 z, • 14 35 37 2250 00327 40469 0 -_..._$0:00 04/09/92- $8. 02 2250 /AUTO -MAINTENANCE--------- _...._.__. $20. 51 -/AUTO-MAINTENANCE 00327 40469 43 $0:00-04/09/92. 2250 00327 40469 47 $0,00---04109/92-4: 001-400-4205-4309 00631 $658.43 2250 0 EQUIP -SERV ICE— /MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS-----_-_.--_ 00165 001-400-4205-4311 00266 $22.41 03/31-492 EQUIP--SERVICE—!AUTO-MAINTENANCE- 00165 001-400-6101-4311 00280 $56.48 03/31/ -92 ---______..___.-_._ PARKS. ------- /AUTO MAINTENANCE R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS --MISC.. -CHARGES/MARCH-92----2250 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC^CHARGES/MARCH-92 2250 00165 105-400-2601-4311 00255 $20.84 03/31492 STREET -LIGHTING -/AUTO -MAINTENANCE • 5. S r 0327 40469 -$0. 00---04/-09,92 2250 00327 40469 $0.-00--04409492- 2250 00327 40469 - _4*0.00 01109/92- 2250 00327 40469 $0 00 04/09492-1 51 52 55 • 0 0 0 9 190 62 03 NW fig 70 71 57 n 74 75 7y 0 • '. 410 32 • •II • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:20:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/09/92, PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 --------MISC.---CHARGES/MARCH-92 2250 03/31/92- R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 MISC. CHARGES/MARCH-92---2250 --03/31-/92 PAGE 0006 DATE 04/09/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 110-400-3302-4311 00777 $471.12 ------------PARKING--ENF /AUTO-MAINTENANCE--- 160-400-3102-4311 AUTO-MAINTENANCE 160-400-3102-4311 00200 $21.56 -- SEWER/ST DRAIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************-*************-**************** R EFRAM MOBIL 01400 MISC---CHARGES/MARCH-92-87508 04/06/92 $2,145.63 2 2250 00327 40469 $0.00---04/09/92- 2250 00327 40469 $0.00----04/09/92- 5 6 7 6 11 • d 0 a 0 Is < • 001-400-2101-4310 00350 $95.86 287508 00328 40470 '''W POLICC /MOTOR -FUELS AND LUBES - $0:00 -04/09/92-21 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *95. 86 R VIRGINIA*ELLEDGE 03858 001-400-2101-4316 00884 $12.00 403 04158 40471 -REIMB-TRAVEL-EXP/MAR--92---403 03/31/92---- ------POLICE-------/TRAINING-- ---- $0.00--04/09/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $12. 00 R BLANCA *GONZALEZ -----DAMAGE-DEPOSIT--REFUND 30646 '04598 001-210-0000-2110 04803 $100.00 30646 04/02(92 /DEPOSITS/WORK-GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100.00 26 2, 20 • 1 • 1 11 ,3 3•, -` 04431 40472 35 griF -$0.00 -04109/92--16, ,„ ]5 v R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX CHARGES/MARCH-92 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED ------FAX-- CHARGES/MARCH 92- • 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00450 $0.39 03/-19/92- CITY COUNCIL-----/TELEPHONE R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED -- FAX-CHARGES/MARCH -92- R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX-CHARGES/MARCH-92 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00501 $0.94 03/19492 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00555 $0.39 03/19/92 CITY --MANAGER /TELEPHONE --- R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED' ---FAX-CHARGES/MARCH-92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00571 $7.08 03/-19/92 I-INANGE-ADMINTELEPHONE- 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00575 $23.19 03/-1-9/92 PERSONNEL- -/TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2101-4304 01003 $70.21 TELEPHONE-CHARGES/MAR CI 1 03/19/92 • 53 • • POL-ICC /TELEPHONE 42 00332 40473 A4 $O 00-04/49/92-45 00332 40473 $0.00 04/09/92 00332 40473 $0.00 04 /09/92 00332 40473 $0.00---04/09/92- • • 9y sa 51 • � 52 53 5545 0 5,4 5" • 00332 40473 5'I $0:00 04109/92-6l 00330 40473 $07-00 04/09/9 2• 63 5411 40 6N 6Y 70 111 • 12 74 5 O r r • • S S • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:20:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/09/92. PAGE 0007 DATE 04/09/92 41) r S • s S S • 0 0 0 0 PAY VENDOR NAME _ VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT .INV/REF PO 4* CHK * z DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ it ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 3 4 6 In R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00575 $1.31 00332 40473 7 I,,I .__ .FAX._CHARGES/MARCH_ 92 03/19192— PLANKING "''TELEPHONE I' $0. 00.---04/09/92._"- R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00518 $5.63 00332 40473 ,' __FAX..CHARGES/MARCH-92 03/.19/9', BUILDING ' /TELEPHONE--•$O.OG 04/09/92-- R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00601 $14.34 00332 40473 ,5 ______ _ __.F_AX CHARGES/.MARCH 92 03L19L92_ PUB.. WKS._ADMIN /TELEPHONE.-.-_ - __.,- __ ._____ ____. $0. 00.-04109/92-.-` te R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00602 $106.10 00330 40473 ,5 TELEPHONE._CHARGES/_MARCH 03LL9192 PUB_ WKS-._ADMIN__LTFI F'PHONE $0.-00--04/09/92-4 22 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED .00015 001-400-4601-4304 00666 $2.30 00332 40473 :3 __.___......__ __.FAX. CHARGES/MARCH 92 03/19/2— COMM -RESOURCES --d.TEL.EPHONE- _.—.-- ----- $0.00---04/09/92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00577 $1.94 00332 40473 , _____ FAX_CHARGES/MARCH_92 03/-19/92- PARKING--EMF----/TELEPHONE--- --- ------ ----- ----- -- $0;00--04/09/92,2, *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $233.82 311 33 'J, R GTEL 01340 001-400-2101-4304 01002 • . $51.56 00333 40474 >; - - _EQUIPNENT__RENTAL/MARCH 03/22/92 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.-00 04/09/92- 3,, *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $51.56 39 R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 00731 001-400-3103-4311 00746 $234.03 3709 04803 40475 " STREET .-SWEEPER-PARTS - 3709 04/09/92-- —.—_______ST -MAINTENANCE --/AUTO-MAINTENANCE $234:03 04/09/92-L"' *** VENDOR TOTAL *****#***#**************a►a►*****#*#***##*****et#*#*#*******#*****arat**ar 4234.03 4, 4y 19 + 49 SO R STEVE*HARTT 00896 001-400-2101-4312 01896 $249.00 04514 40476 5, MEALS/HOTEL/POST-CLASS 04/01-142- POLICE /TRAVEL -EXPENSE --.-POST $0-00 04/09/92-7,- *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************at************3r******,r******et* $249.00 55 A5 5: SB R HEDGER COMPANY 01121 001-400-3103-4311 00747 $322.38 • 32020 03696 40477 =9 ST -SWEEPER-GUTTER--BROOM--32020 04/09/92----------- ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO -MAINTENANCE ---_--..$335: 58-04/09/92-y�� R HEDGER COMPANY 01121 705-400-1210-4324 00086 $202.84 32019 03362 40477 ' PKG METER ii -VAN -GEAR -BOX ---32019 04/09/92 AUTO/PROP/BONDS-/CLAIt4S/SETTLEMENTS—$211r09--Q4/09/42- w ] ai •:4 G•i :n ,4 zi ,4 41) r S • s S S • 0 0 0 0 • •i F INANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:20:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/09/92, VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # PAGE 0008 DATE 04/09/92 AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************'ra'*********************ad ** $525.22 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC - DISCOUNT OFFERED 38117 02458 001-202-0000-2021 00180 03/25/92- INGLEWOOD 3/25/92 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-202-0000-2022 00176 ---------- - ----DISCOUNT-TAKEN-----------38117-- —03/25/92 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC --------MISC.--CHARGES/MARCH--92----3811-7 02458 03/25/92 $9.28 DISCOUNTS- OFFERED 38117 00337 40478 - $0.00-04/09/92 $9.28CR 38117 00337 40478 /DISCOUNTS ---TAKEN--------• - - - ---- $0. 00----04/09/92 001-400-4204-4309 02299 $59.68 38117 00337 40478 BLDG-MAINT---/MAINTENANCE-MATERIALS - --$0.00--04/09/92 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-400-4204-4321 00646 $164.44 38117 -MISC.- CHARGES/MARCH-92--3811- 03/25/92 -----------BLDG MAINT --/BUILDING--SAFETY/SECURIT---- -- - R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC MISC.- CHARGES/MARCH-92-38117 02458 105-400-2601-4309 00800 $231.54 03/25/92 - - -STREET--LIGHTING-/MAINTENANCE-MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL*************-'**********************-»*'ir**'n******-n*******-x*-n***•n***'b* 1,, $455.66 R DALE E. *JOHNSON REIMBURSE -TOWING -FEES 04599 001-300-0000-3841 04/02/92 00406 $36. 50- tPOL-ICE TOWING 00337 40478 $0.00-04/09/92 38117 00337 40478 $0.00---04/09/92 R DALE E.*JOHNSON 04599 001-400-2101-4201 01000 . $90.00 REIMBURSE -TOWING -FEEL 04/02/92 POLICE- /CONTRACT--SERVICE/PRIVA *** VENDOR TOTAL $126.50 6 10 II 'T7; 16 16 r • • • • • • 04160 40479 $0.00 04/09/92- 3.1 36 36 3, 04160 40479 $O: --04/09/92H-,7 42 don 41 lip • • R LA GUINTA INN LODGING/D—BOHACIK 03125 001-400-2101-4312 01892 $413.60 04/06192 POLICE— /TRAVEL -EXPENSE ----PAST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************•»************************************* $413.60 04522 40480 $0.00 ---04109/92- 45 0.00--04/09/92- R R R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. DISCOUNT -OFFERED- 17 LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. DISCOUNT -TAKEN 17 00077 001-202-0000-2021 00181 04/07492 $1.07 DISCOUNTSOFFERED 00077 001-202-0000-2022 04 /07-/-92------ - 00177 $1. 07CR -/DISCOUNTS--TAKEN LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. 00077 001-400-4202-4305 00688 $52.18 MI8G:--CHARGES/MARCH-92 - 17 0410792 PUB WKS-ADMIN--/OFF-iGE-OPER--SUPPLIES 17 00340 40481 $0.00 04/09/92- 17 00340 40481 $0.00 ---04109/92 45 47 • -18 51 52 53 5.5 ••,s 61 • • 6' 17 00340 40481 • 6' $0.00-04/09/-92 45 P 66 6] 68 69 )1 ]l '3 '4 75 79, 0 • 0, 7. 0 •i e • O FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:20:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/09/92 PAGE 0009 DATE 04/09/92 PAY VENDOR NAME -a . VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION - DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 2 3 4 6 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****gra************************************ire►************************ 452.18 7 , a s 10 R CITY OF*LONG BEACH 04593 001-400-2101-4312 01899 `- ' 4223.00 04520 40482 "1 TUITION/HATANO/K9- 04/06/92 ' 210004 y --POLICE— ---/TRAVEL-EXPENSE - ,--POST-------- - ----- ------ 40. 00 --04109/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL************•***-*************************•*************-***********•**** 4223.00 '5 16 1'! R LOS ANGELES CO MARSHALLS' OFF. 03849 001-400-2101-4305 01742 421.00 2299 04304 40483 '' SMALL_CLAIMS--COURT-_FEES 2999 03/24/92— POLICE /OFFICE --OPER -SUPPLIES -------------------------40.00---04/09/922 21 22 R LOS ANGELES CO MARSHALLS' OFF. 03849 001-400-2101-4305 01743 421.00 2300 04305 40483 23 _ .. _ __. ____SMALL CLAIMS._-COURT_FEES.__._2300 03/31/-92-___..._- _-_POLICE ---1OFFICE-OPER-SUPPLIES=--------- --------.- 40. 00--04/09/92--4 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************a*********•****************at*********************** $42.00 r• 2N .:I R MAJOR ERECTORS 04560 001-400-4204-4309 02298 4820.00 3341 03694 40484 3, 'x'341 04/09!92 BLDG- MAINT -�_-WINDMILLREPAIR—__. ,� -!MAINTENANCE--MATERIALS----------- 4820.00 01/09/92-34 *** VENDOR TOTAL********a*********************************************************** 4820.00 35 l] R MANERI SIGN CO., INC. 01255 001-400-3104-4309 00854 41,750.40 6202 -IN 04802 40485 "' TRAFFIC_.CONES/SIGN-SUPP 02 --IN 031-18492- TRAFFIC-SAFETY---IJ9AINTENANCE-MATERIALS-------41, "-' 750: 00 01.09192 J R MANERI SIGN CO., INC. 01255 001-400-6101-4309 01217 4259.80 14337 04801 40485 4, 4-------------PARKING-LOT-SIGNS--------14337------03418/92 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS - ------$259. 80 04/09/92- *** VENDOR TOTAL ***•na******a*•»•n• *****•r*•r-gra*•»******-»****x•**•tr•»*•x****•n#•n*************** 42, 010. 20 .u, R KENNETH A.*MEERSAND - 04138 001-400-1132-4201 00106 45.825.00 04156 40486 5, ---LEGAL--SERVICES/FED-1992 -03425492 CTY PROSECUTOR--ICONTRAGT-.SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.-00---0-4/09/92- 0.00 04/09/92-*** VENDOR TOTAL***************•n*•x*•x-nx•*•u•**********************it********•x****at**•x-rr*** 45, 825. 00 ' 51 *** 4`' R MICHAELS 03167 001-400-4601-4308 00666 464.60 00447 40487 ", 4; MISC.-CHARGES-APRIL 92 04/09/92 COMM RESOURCES ---/PROGRAM--MATERIALS.----•------..----•$0.00--04/09/92 5- n, *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 464.60 a, 4v '0 R. PACIFIC LUMBER CO. 00606 001-400-3103-4309 01335 • $81.19 13 00351 40488 ,,+ si MISC.---CHARGES/MARCH-92 13 04/07/92— ST MAINTENANCE -/MAINTENANCE-MATERIALS----------40.-00-04/09192-`'" ]O :4 )1 ' 72 13 ]4 I 15 r OP • • • • • • • O 0 0 0 0 to • I I6 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:20:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/09/92, VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** PAGE 0010 DATE 04/09/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $81..19 R AIDAN*PLUNKETT REIMBURSE TOWING FEES R AIDAN*PLUNKETT --REIMBURSE-TOWING-FEES 04600 001-300-0000-3841 04/02/92--- — - —. 00407 $18.25 /POLICE TOWING 04600 001-400-2101-4201 01001 $20.75 -04/02/92----__._______ ._POLICE---- ----/CONTRACT--SERVICE/PRIVAT- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R OFCR R. *SALDANA ---MILEAGE/POST-CLASS $39.00 02165 001-400-2101-4312 01894 $265.72 04/02/92 -- POLICE-- -- .---ATRAVEL--EXPENSE-,- PQST- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $265.72 R SAN BERNARDINO SHERIFF'S DEPT. TUIT-ION/SAVOY/BOHACIK 04595 001-400-2101-4312 01897 $334.00 04/06/92 -POLICE- /TRAVEL EXPENSE -r -POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $334.00 )ada 6 ro 04159 40489 11 *0.00-04/09/92 lat 04159 40489 151m $0: 00-04/09/92- ;6 , • 19 IY • 2, 04517 40490 ' $0.-00--04 /09/92-- '^ 26 2i • ,LIQ 04523 40491 R SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY COLLEGE REG/SAVOY/BOHACIK 04596 001-400-2101-4312 04/06/92 POLICE 01898 $28.00 $0.00---04/09/92 • 36 • 36 3! 04524 40492 /TRAVEL- EXPENSE-,-POST----------$0:-00--04/09792- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $28.00 R OFCR LARRY*SAVOY MEALS /POST-- CLASS - 00628 001-400-2101-4312 01893 $27.00 04521 40493 04/06/92 POLICE- /TRAVEL EXPENSE -.-POST $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************* $27. 00 ^^ 4l • 0%/09/92-^„ 5U 51 62 I"' H •'3 •' R SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK TRUSTEE-FEES/RROW 03263 126-400-8514-4201 00016 $1,158.41 03/30/-92 GIP 89-514------/CONTRAGT-SERV I C E/PR I VAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 31, i 58. 41 04711 40494 • •5'i , $0.00 04/09/92-1 � • 001-400-1101-4305 00419 $90.26 1465541 MISC,-CHARGES/MARCH--92-65541 03/19492 CITY-COUNC-1L /OFFIGE-OPER-SUPPL-IES 61 00362 40495 6i • 67• 10 ,1 • • 0 !4 75/ 0 FINANCE-SFA340 r TIME 14:20:49 AI -I MISC. _ - - 00114 001-400-2201-4187 00308 $48.71 1465541 00362 40495 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/09/92. VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION • PAGE 0011 DATE 04/09/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • • 'I • R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY *** VENDOR TOTAL ***************************** ************* ****•b-******** **ary►***** $138.97 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00400 110-300-0000-3302 44988 $437.00 .CITAT ION -COURT,_BAIL.____ ___-_—__.___04/.02/-92—____--__-___— ___I000RI-..FINES /PARK ING--- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • z< $437.00 0 9 0 1 • 1 03377 40496 .511, $0. 00- ---04/09492-1n • zn z1 P2: •�3 ,A 31 R SOUTH BAY NOTICING AND 03882 001-400-4101-4201 00144 $115.00 92HERO4A 00364 40497 MISC__CHARGES/APRIL_92.___ERd4A�-- 04/02/92 --____—____PLANNING ---/CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT ----- - ----- $0:-00.-04/09/-92- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC_CHARGES/MARCH- $115.00 00159 001-400-3101-4303 00200 $29.31 04/01192.----.—.- --MEDIANS---/UTILITIES 00366 40498 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-3104-4303 00108 $450.38 ELECTRIC--CHARGES/MARCH- 04/01/92 TRAFFIC -SAFETY --/UTILITIES R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00545 34,503.29 ELECTRIC-CHARGES/MARCH 04/01.492-- BLDG -MA INT- .- —/UTI L -IT IES • • SOUTHERN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00419 $1,075.68 ELECTRIC. CHARGES/MARCH 04/01-492- -PARKS —/UTILITIES--- - R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA E_DISON CO. 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00347 $271.81 ELEC TRIC_.CHARGES/MARCH 04/-01-/.92 STREET -LIGHT-ING-AUT IL ITI ES R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO, —.--..ELECTRIC-CHARGES/MARCH 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00190. $75.79 04/01/-92 SEWER/ST- DRAIN—/UTILI-TIES *** VENDOR TOTAL************************•******************************************** $6.406.26 $0,00 ---04409/92- 3A 00366 40498 35 $0.00 01/09/92- 39 • 00366 40498 $0.00 01109/92 - 00366 40498 A3 $0.00 01/09/92 AA 00366 40498 147 $0. 00-04/09/92 00366 40498 51 $0-00---04/09/92- 00139 5 33 5A R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP 00146 001-400-4601-4305 01043 $49.64 1208073-61 00033 40499 WATER COOLER RENT/MAR-92-.73-61----.04/07/92------------ ---------- COMM -RESOURCES ---/OFFICE---OPER SUPPLIES-- --- - •- $0--00-04/Q9/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $49.64 49 92 •- 5A 55 59 R WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY00141 001-400-1122-4201 00268 • $224.50 652-893-746 03903 40500 67 PUBLICATIONS/CI-TY-CLERK--3--746-L-----02/03/92 ELECTIONS --/CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT------$0:00-04/09/92.-� �v 0 70 72 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ri1 W X11 a 3 a 3 3 a • • 0 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 14:20:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/09/92, PAGE 0012 DATE 04/09/92 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION ,. DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 2 4 *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************************ars*********** $224..50 I t 5 7 8 • *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** *32,828.50 9 *** TOTAL WARRANTS*•***************************************************************** 532,828.50 ,3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 • 1.1 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS�.�COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PACTS G TO I . INCLUSIVE, OF THE - --- 21 22 24 ?- WARRANT REGISTER FOR �!�7 7� - ARE ACCURATE, r, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE ,I4DGET z� 26 BY — 29 x FINANCE 1I'ECTOR t 4. 31 32 I .. 'DATE— . 33 34 35 35 1J IIF.. 37 37, X319 I, 41 42 n3 44 v. 47 I, 3 49 w 51 52 315.1 4: 5• 4 59 ,„ 34- L 4 2 6 61.I 6.4 - - I66I f x51 16Rq]1 61' 71 71 vi • . • :JOB SFA340,BATCH.FINANCE,PUB • r r • • • • • • • • • 0 • March 24, 1992 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council April 14, 1992 CANCELLATION ON WARRANTS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the warrants listed below. #038879 - 10/31/91 - Whitlow Emergency Medical Grp - $131.05 Account Number 001-400-2101-4201 - Payment stopped. Warrant was never received by payee. #039018 - 11/14/91 - Ca. Soc. of Municipal Finance - $40.00 - Account Number 001-400-1202-4316. Employee did not attend conference. #039410 - 12/19/91 - George Lanz - $116.00 - Account Number 001-300-0000-3115. Payment Stopped. Lost by payee after received. #039644 - 1/9/92 - U.S. West Public Safety Group - $1,500.00 - Account Number 001-400-2101-4316 - Class cancelled due to poor attendance. Concur: Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager ary Br is h City T easurer Noted for fiscal impact Viki Copeland Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council April 9, 1992 City Council Meeting of April 14, 1992 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS April 28, 1992 Student of the Month for April Proclamation for Redondo Beach Centennial celebration Proclamation declaring May Water Awareness Month Proclamation declaring May 3 - 9 "Hire -A -Veteran -Week CIP 85-137 - Valley Ardmore overlay - accept as complete Council 10/9/90 Map and time schedule street sweeping Coordination of street sweeping with trash pickup days 3rd Quarter CIP status report Quarterly update of Goals Implementation Program May 12, 1992 Proclamation Public Works Week May 18 to 22 Identify misc. revenue, develop appropriate fee (GIP) Project Touch lease renewal (Rms. 3 & 11) May 14, 1992 Joint Council workshop meeting with Chamber of Commerce and Planning Commission May 26, 1992 Student of the Month for May 1 Public Works Director for Public Wks. Dir. Public Works Dir. Public Works Director City Manager Public Works Director Finance Director Community Resources Dir. Street lighting/Crossing Guard (a) resolution approving report (b) resolution setting public hearing for June 23 Recommendation re. report on survey- ing discrepancies and existing procedure for protecting survey monuments along Monterey Blvd. and Bayview Dr. between 16th & 19th Streets June 9, 1992 Approval of Land Use Element (GIP) Dispute Resolution Services lease renewal June 11 or 18, 1992 Joint meeting of Council with Planning Commission June 23, 1992 Student of the Month for June Report on civilian enforcement officers (GIP) Street lighting/Crossing Guard public hearing July 28, 1992 4th Quarter CIP status report Quarterly update of Goals Implementation Program August 11, 1992 Hope Chapel Lease renewal (Rms. 5, 6A) September 8, 1992 Association for Retarded Citizens lease renewal (Rm. 1, 2, 15) South Bay Hospital District lease renewal (Rm 9) Easter Seals lease renewal (Rms. 16, 17) - 2 - Public Works Director Public Works Director Planning Director Community Resources Dir. Public Safety Director Public Works Director Public Works Director City Manager Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. December, 1992 Project Touch lease renewal (Rm.C) Community Resources Dir. ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Caltrans utility maintenance agrmt. Historic Preservation Ordinance (with Land Use Element) Public Works Director Planning Director ***************************************************************** Initiated by Party Date Council 5/8/90 Re. oil project CUP - define "temporary" as relates to height of project Planning Director Goal 4 5/16/90 Options to computerize per- sonnel as part of payroll function Finance Director Council 8/14/90 Review of standard CUP conditions Planning Dir. Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Public Works Dir. City Mgr.2/21/91 RFP for computer system Data Processing Council 3/12/91 South School Conceptual design Community Resources Council 6/6/91 Review Bldg/Zoning Code changes to improve liveability Planning Director Staff 7/25/91 Adjustment of Park Tax Building Director Council 8/27 Revision of allowable uses in open space zone Planning Council 9/24/91 Effect of nonconforming ordinance on damaged structures Planning Dept. Report on productivity incentives for employees (GIP) Personnel Director 3 Participate w/school civics program coordinator (GIP) Personnel Director Statistical survey - requested at 4/23/91 meeting Report on cost effectiveness of downtown enforcement (GIP) Police/Finance Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council e:t - -4 6 c :I L ) ._,% 9-1.- April am" April 8, 1992 City Council Meeting of April 14, 1992 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of March 1992. Respectfully submitted, Gary Brutsch City Treasu'er NOTED: Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager ld INVESTMENT REPORT - MARCH 1992 DATE OF DATE OF ASKING MARKET INSTITUTION TOTAL INVESTMENT MATURITY PRICE VALUE INTEREST LAIF BALANCE 3/1/92 Investment Investment Investment Maturity Investment $4,948,756.18 1,200,000.00 500,000.00 400,000.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 BALANCE 3/31/92 $7,148,756.18 LACPIF Railroad Right -of -Way Account BALANCE 3/01/92 $ 917,209.79 BALANCE 2/29/92 917,209.79 3/02/92 3/05/92 3/25/92 3/23/92 3/18/92 5.863% 5.22% MERRILL LYNCH CORPORATE NOTES: Ford Motor Credit Co. Investment $ 500,000.00 5/19/88 5/20/93 $ 500,000.00 $ 520,710 9.10% U.S. TREASURY BOND: Investment $ 995,312.50 4/20/90 3/31/92 $ 995,312.50 $1,010,625 8.763% Investment $ 996,875.00 5/14/90 2/15/93 $ 996,875.00 $1,043,125 8.49% Investment $1,005,937.50 9/14/90 6/30/94 $1,005,937.50 $1,060,625 8.50% INVESTMENT TOTAL $11,564,090.97 SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST BALANCE 2/1/92 $ 531,032.22 Adjustment 146,921.45 BALANCE 2/29/92 677,953.67 8.625% TICOR TITLE INSURANCE CO. BALANCE 12/31/91 $ 11,717.01 BALANCE 12/31/91 11,717.01 7.5% TRUSTEE TOTAL $ 689,670.68 GRAND TOTAL $12,253.761.65 Respectfully Submitted, ary :rutsch City Treasurer April 1, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 14, 1992 AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL FOR USE OF VISA BANK CARD Recommendation: It is hereby recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution thereby adding the City Manager, Frederick R. Ferrin, to the list of authorized personnel eligible to utilize the City's VISA card. Background: The City has had possession of a bank card since 1981. Bank requirements dictate that each eligible user be specifically identified by name and title via a City Council resolution. Analysis: As the former City Manager's name was on the list of authorized personnel eligible to use this card, we are simply requesting the new City Manager's name be substituted. Respectfully submitted: Concur: 4-0144J flea -44(4;Q_ Robert A. Blackwood Steve Wisniewski Personnel Director Interim City Manager pers/visa 1e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 88-5109 RELATING TO AUTHORIZED USERS OF VISA BANK CARD SERVICES FROM CENTINELA-SOUTH BAY CREDIT UNION VISA WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation, was issued a CENTINELA-SOUTH BAY CREDIT UNION VISA card from the Centinela South Bay Credit Union for use by certain officers and.. employees by Resolution No. 81-4489, as amended by Resolution No. 85-4860, Resolution No. 87-5025 and Resolution No. 88-5109. WHEREAS, a new City Manager has been hired and his responsibilities require purchases that could be facilitated by a bank card service. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the authorized signatures in Section 1 of Resolution 88-5109 be amended to read as follows: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES: Frederick R.Ferrin Steve Wisniewski City Manager Public Safety Director Robert A. Blackwood, Personnel Director PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of April, 1992. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM: , City Clerk , City Attorney Honorable Mayor and Members of April 6, 1992 Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 14, 1992 APPROVAL OF TRANSFER TO CITY ATTORNEY BUDGET Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve a transfer of funds in the amount of $40,000 from the Retirement Account ($24,000) and the Employee Benefit Account ($16,000) to the City Attorney Account for Contract Services. Background: The budgeted amount for the City Attorney, Contract Services account is $120,000. Expenditures are made from this account for services of the City Attorney and for copies and supplements of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code and zoning code. Based on 90-91 expenditures, code supplements and copies will cost approximately $5,000, leaving $115,000 for City Attorney services. Total expenditures in 1990-91 were $110,626, with $105,504 to the City Attorney and $5,122 for code supplements, etc. Analysis: Through February, City Attorney costs (less amounts due from Greenwood Development for the Miller Case) are $103,748. Annualized, the amount will be approximately $155,000. According to the City Attorney, costs are higher this fiscal year primarily due to additional time spent on oil drilling matters. This higher level of spending on oil matters was not anticipated in the budget. Legal costs, through February, regarding oil drilling are $38,850; at the same level of expenditure, the annual amount would be $57,985. In 1990-91, $12,608 was spent on legal costs relating to oil drilling. According to the Deputy City Attorney, an aggressive game plan on oil approval could easily add $20,000 more in costs. It may be necessary, if an aggressive plan is adopted, to come back to Council for additional funds prior to the end of the year. Costs incurred on oil drilling matters are being tracked for potential recovery from oil revenue, however, since no funds are available now, a transfer of funds or additional appropriation is necessary. The Retirement and Employment Benefits Accounts appear to have enough funds available for the transfer, however the budget for the remainder of the year will be very tight. The City Manager has the authority to approve transfers between departments in the same fund, however approval from Council is being requested in the interest of keeping the City Council abreast of the budget. Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director if CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of tj e City Council FROM: Michael Schubach, Pla nnin ire or �t SUBJECT: Resolution of Intent to tudy Section 10-8, Off -sale Alcohol Beverage Establishments DATE: April 7, 1992 Attached herewith is the Resolution of Intent requested at the meeting of March 24, 1992. At that meeting the Council voted 3:1 to direct the Planning Commission to study changing the standard conditions for off -sale alcohol beverage establishments. Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager p/memo2 5'53.2 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 92- A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO STUDY SECTION 10-8 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO GROCERY STORES AND OTHER OFF -SALE ALCOHOL BEVERAGE ESTABLISHMENTS AND DIRECTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO STUDY CHANGING THE STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR SUCH USES WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on March 24, 1992, and discussed Section 10-8 as it relates to grocery stores and other off -sale liquor establishments and made the following findings: A. Section 10-8, which sets forth standard conditions for Conditional Use Permits for off -sale Alcohol Beverage establishments, needs refining and clarification; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby initiate consideration of amendments to Section 10-8 of the Zoning Ordinance and directs the Planning Commission to study changing the standard conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1992, by: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APR ED AS TO D ORM: p/ccrsint CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY CONSENSUS OF COUNCIL - WOULD LIKE TO MEET WITH VPD BUT PREFER SEPARATELY AS MEETING GETTING TOO LARGE. HOLD UNTIL NEXT MEET- ING WHEN KM PRESENT TO DISCUSS BIFURCATING THE MEETING. (c) Request for waiver of the automatic vacancy resulting from absences by Planning Commissioner Steven Suard. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 18, 1992. MOTION SE/AW TO WAIVE THE VACANCY. SO ORDERED. 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (a) Request from Mayor Midstokke for discussion of concern regarding regularly scheduled Vehicle Parking District meetings and compliance with open meeting laws and City policies. NO DISCUSSION - MAYOR MIDSTOKKE ABSENT. *(b) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for discussion of a review of Boccato's conditional use permit. SE - IS THERE ANY INTEREST IN REFINING SECTION 10.8 AS IT RELATES TO GROCERY AND OTHER OFFSALE LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENTS. MOTION SE/RB - HAVE STAFF COME BACK WITH RESOLUTION OF INTENT ON NEXT AGENDA TO HAVE P.C. STUDY CHANGING THE STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR SUCH USE. OK 3-1 (AW -NO). CITIZEN COMMENTS HOWARD LONGACRE - HAD SEVERAL SUBJECTS. 1) ITEM 1A, DISAGREES WITH THE WAY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE HANDLES AMENDING MINUTES. RE WILL LOOK INTO. 2) COMPLAINED ABOUT NO MORE MARKING (PAINTING) THE CROSSES AND T'S. ON RESIDENTIAL STREETS. RE. CALTRANS - COMPLAINED ABOUT UNSAFE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS DUE TO CALTRANS ACTIONS. WOULD LIKE TO SEE MORE MONITORING DONE TO BE PAID FOR BY CALTRANS. ROBERT UDOVICH - ASKED ABOUT CESSATION OF DELIVERY BY ROUND TABLE PIZZA. CITY ATTORNEY SAYS IT IS EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, HOWEVER VONS COULD ASK THE COURTS FOR A RESTRAINING ORDER. SE - REFERRED TO WES BUSH CORRESPONDENCE RE. POSSIBLE AIR FORCE BASE CLOSURE. - 6 - 3/zµ/' 2_ C Ac; a, , Sit E'4 April 6, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the City Council April 14, 1992 KIWANIS TREE LOT AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER RECOMMENDATION 02- V-iso—�� It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council approve the request by the Kiwanis Club to operate a Christmas tree lot on the front lawn of the Community Center for the holiday season in 1992. BACKGROUND The Kiwanis Club has operated this lot for four years on the Community Center Lawn (southeast portion) and each year Council has approved this request. Attached you will find the 1992 letter of request from the Kiwanis Club. The sale will be a fundraiser for the Kiwanis Club and will also benefit the Community Center Foundation's improvement fund for the Community Center. The Kiwanis Club agrees to donate $1,000 or 10% of their net profits, whichever is higher, to the Community Center Foundation. ANALYSIS The following list of terms will be in effect for 1992 season: . The location of the trees shall be on the front lawn of the Community Center (abutting 11th Place); . The area can be fenced in and lighted; . Temporary signs can be installed on the front lawn directly in front of the trees and between the marquee and the designated site; . Kiwanis will assume all costs for restoring the area back to its original state, with the Public Works Department approving all work; this may include other areas as the sprinkler system will have to be turned off in that particular area but it will affect other areas as well; said work to be completed by January 15, 1993; . Kiwanis will be allowed to have a camper on 11th Place for 24 hour security purposes; . Kiwanis will pay to the City any other costs incurred by the City with regard to thiF project; . Kiwanis may occupy the site from November 21, 1992 through January 1, 1993; 1 lh . Kiwanis will provide insurance. The Kiwanis Club has proven over the years to be responsible and cooperative with all City requirements and requests. The lot has proven to have minimal negative impact on the condition of the lawn and on the smooth operation of the Community Center. The Kiwanis Club will present the Community Center Foundation with a check for $1,200 at the April 14, 1992 Council meeting. The $1,000 donation to the Foundation this year will certainly be a great help toward meeting Community Center improvement goals. Concur: ar De ey, Director unity Resources Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager 2 Respectfully subm ted, Mar ha rns Administrative Aide Dept. of Community Resources February 13, 1992 Mayor Kathleen Midstokke City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Ca., 90254 Kiwanis Club of Hermosa Beach Post Office Box 121 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mayor Midstokke, On behalf of the Kiwanis Club of Hermosa Beach, I would very much like to request that the City of Hermosa Beach once again consider authorizing our public service organization to conduct its annual Christmas Tree Lot holiday fundraising event in December 1992. The December 1992 Christmas Tree Lot will mark the fifth year that our club will have worked with the City to help us achieve our annual fundraising goals. The Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club Christmas Tree Lot has proven to be a successful method for raising funds which not only support many local community programs but assists and benefits the residents of our community as well. We propose to use the same location for our 1992 tree lot which is located in the southeast portion of the Hermosa Beach Community Center property. As in previous years, we propose to operate our tree lot according to the same terms and conditions. All of the members of the Kiwanis Club of Hermosa Beach join me in thanking you and the other members of the City Council for your past support. Along with continuing community support we are hopeful that you will once again grant our request for this annual event. Sj.pceGL rely, Dallas Yost, "President Kiwanis Club of Hermosa each April 1, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of April 14, 1992 REQUEST FROM THE WOMEN'S PROFESSIONAL VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION TO AMEND JUNE, 1992 CONTRACT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by staff that Council approve the following amendments to the contract per the request of the Women's Professional Volleyball Association (WPVA) regarding their June 13th and 14th tournament. a. Change the title sponsor from Coors Light to Kahlua. b. Add Friday, June 12th to the tournament schedule. BACKGROUND On February 11, 1992 City Council approved the request and contract for a women's professional beach volleyball tournament to be held in Hermosa Beach on June 13th and 14th sponsored by Coors Light. On March 24th, staff received a request from the WPVA to change the title sponsor to Kahlua naming the tournament the "Kahlua Hermosa Open." Their second request is to add Friday, June 12th to the event schedule allowing a four -woman format of play to the tournament. Please see attached letter from Roxana Vargas, Executive Director of WPVA. The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission was informed of these changes at their March 25th meeting. They did not have any concerns with the requested changes. ANALYSIS The change of title sponsor will have little if any impact on the event from a logistical standpoint. The concept of a three (3) day tournament has already been approved by Council for the Men's tournament scheduled for August 28-30, 1992. An additional $1,570 will be charged to add June 12th to the event for a total of $4,710 in permit fees. While the amendments before you are not insignificant, the increase in permit and additional City fees will adequately compensate for the requested changes. 1 fr ii ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter of Request. 2. Amended contract 3. City Council minutes from Feb. 11, 1992 meeting. Concur: Mary Comm nity Re ey, Director o rces Dept. Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager 2 Respectfully submitted, Coucej 46, QA.I.A_ Carol Belser Recreation Specialist Community Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal Imuact: Viki Copeland, Director Finance Dept. WOMEN'S PROFESSIONAL VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION March 27, 1992 Ms. Carol Belser City of Hermosa Beach 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach CA 90254 Dear Carol: As per your suggestion the following will outline the recent changes that have taken placed in efforts to bring women's pro beach volleyball to the City of Hermosa. TITLE SPONSOR - Due to existing sponsor commitments from 1991 a title change is requested. The new title of the Hermosa Open is the "Kahlua Hermosa Open" CHANGE OF DATE - The event is being changed to a three day event due to the addition of a four -women format that will commence compeition on Friday, June 12, at 2:00pm. ESPN has agreed to broadcast two one hour shows scheduled to air July 14 and July 16, 1992. I trust the above changes will not a affect our permit. I am aware that there will be additional permit cost assoicated by adding Friday. I look foward to the City's response, I will follow this letter with a phone call in the next few days. Roxana Vargas Executive Director 400 Corporate Pointe • Suite 725 • Culver City, CA 90230 (213) 215-2969 • Fax: (213) 215-2970 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT(S) CONTRACT This contract is entered into on April 14, 1992, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between Women's Professional Volleyball Association (WPVA) a Sporting Events Promoter, and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY), with regard to the WOMEN'S PROFESSIONAL VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT ON JUNE 12, 13 and 14, 1992. FEES Event fee shall be $4,710. The $500 deposit will be applied toward the $4,710 permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the City. All predetermined costs fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the Tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the City. SECURITY The City of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the Tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one representative of WPVA. WPVA shall provide no less than ten security officers. .Said officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other Tournament staff. A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the Tournament for a pre -event briefing. The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of the City's alcohol ordinance. The City of Hermosa Beach shall provide Officers for the event as follows for each day of Tournament, 10:00 AM - 6:00 PM: 1 Sergeant 2 Officers or as many officers as deemed necessary by Public Safety Director. Cost of officers shall be assumed by WPVA. CLEAN-UP WPVA shall provide a professional maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the Tournament: . The Beach and Strand, from 8th Street to 15th Street. . Pier Avenue, from Strand to Monterey Avenue. The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the trash collected outside the City each day of the Tournament. All maintenance work is to be concluded by 8:00 PM each evening. WPVA shall provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: . Beach (impacted area) . Strand (impacted area) . Hermosa Valley Greenbelt (impacted area) or additional trash receptacles as needed. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES WPVA shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of Tournament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. INSURANCE WPVA shall, not later than 30 days prior to the event, provide the City a Certificate of Insurance providing personal injury and property damage liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. Said insurance shall not be cancelled or altered without 30 day notice in writing to the City and County. WPVA insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to contribute. WPVA agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of the event promotion firm/sponsor its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors; with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to event. ADVERTISING Signage regarding the CITY'S alcohol ordinance shall be required by WPVA. City staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for posting. City of Hermosa Beach shall permit two street banners to be posted for Tournament. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of WPVA. CITY shall permit WPVA to display two large replicas of their product. City staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. WPVA shall be required to make announcements informing spectators of the CITY'S alcoholic beverage ordinance as deemed necessary by Hermosa Beach Police. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by WPVA to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of event promotion firm/sponsor. PARKING WPVA shall be required to make announcements indicating 1) where there is free parking and 2) that the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. SPECIAL EVENTS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events requested to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. If WPVA desires any County services, they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by WPVA. The CITY shall allow access to Tournament site for setup forty eight (48) hours prior to Tournament. The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue, Beach Drive to the Strand for Tournament staff and film equipment parking. At no time may event/promotion firm block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at anytime by the CITY. City staff shall inspect grandstand construction and authorize public access. The CITY shall allow WPVA the opportunity to sell official concession items per certain conditions. No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted. All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID CONTRACT. MISCELLANEOUS WPVA RESPONSIBILITIES WPVA shall provide as many portable port -a -johns as determined necessary by City staff. WPVA shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. WPVA shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and personnel necessary for conducting such a Tournament. Event shall be conducted in compliance with City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances on file at the Department of Community Resources. WPVA shall take the necessary steps to encourage participants and require sponsors to utilize recycling bins for appropriate materials. WPVA shall make arrangements to provide such bins. CITY A BEA City attorney Date Mayor Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES Director Date Women's Professional Volleyball Association President Date Hermosa Beach City Clerk Date through 39826 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 39762, 39763, 39786, 39823, 39824, 39825, and 39826. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. Interim City Manager Wisniewski responded to Council questions and agreed to provide the procedure and policy for the use of "flash money" by the Police to Benz. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. So ordered. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) (e) (f) Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. Recommendation to receive and file the January, 1992 investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated February 4, 1992. Action: To receive and file the January, 1992 invest- ment report as presented. Recommendation to increase rental fees for Clark Build- ing for private parties and receptions. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated January 28, 1992. Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff recommendation to in- crease the fees for renting Clark Building for private parties and receptions to: 1) Fee per hour for private parties $ 30; 2) Cleanup/Damage deposit '250; and, 3) Booking Fee (non refundable) 100; and change the format by changing the title of the non refundable fee from maintenance fee to booking fee, in order to decrease confusion with the refundable clean- ing/maintenance fee. Recommendation to approve the request and contract for the 1992 Women's Pro Volleyball Tournament to be held on the Pier Courts June 13 and 14, 1992. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated January 29, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Wiemans for separate discussion later in the meeting, due to the concern .for the need to limit the number of beach events per year. City Council Minutes 02-11-92 Page 7698 Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., concerned with set-up time, sales booths, and street closure; Sheila Donohue Miller - 77 17th Street, concerned with beach deed restrictions; and, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, concerned with City liability regarding bleacher inspection. Community Resources Director Rooney responded to Council questions by stating that the items to be sold were event related items, no food was to be sold, and staff had requested that Pier Avenue, from Beach Drive west, be'blocked off for crowd safety. City Attorney Vose responded to Council questions by stating that the beach deed restrictions did not mention a ban on the sale of commercial items; and, the City would be liable in any event, particularly if they did not inspect the bleachers, this was the reason for the $2,000,000 additional insured policy requirement for the event organizers. (g) (h) Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to: 1) approve the request for a professional beach vol- leyball tournament to be held June 13 and 14, 1992, on the Pier Courts; and, 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the contract with the Women's Professional Volleyball Association (WPVA) to include City fees of $1,570 per day ($3,140 to- tal) and a $2,000,000 event liability certificate. Motion Wiemans, second Mayor Midstokke. The motion car- ried unanimously. Recommendation to approve request for 30 day extension of temporary appointment for the Acting General Services Director and one General Services Officer. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 5, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation as presented. Recommendation regarding "pilot project" for City Hall PC based Local Area Network Computer System. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated February 6, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. City Council Minutes 02-11-92 Page 7699 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 6, 1992 Z—/r- - City Council Meeting of April 14, 1992 RECOMMENDATION REGARDING TELEPHONE SYSTEM Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve the attached proposal to extend for one (1) year, the maintenance contract for services on the City's owned telephone switching and key equipment; and 2. Continue to support the (purchase/lease) of a new telephone system, as funding becomes available. Background: The City began leasing the current switching and key equipment (PBX Focus II, switchboard, and telephones) in 1978. The expected life -span of this type of equipment is 10-15 years. In August of 1987, the City purchased the telephone switching and key equipment for a cost of $13,000+. A one (1) year warranty, and a maintenance agreement for four (4) years amounting to $22,000+, was included in the buy-out. At the time of the buy-out, the remaining lease and maintenance contract over a period of four (4) years, represented a cost figure of $71,000+. The current maintenance contract will expire in August, at which time, all repair 'calls will be charged on a "time and material" basis. Repair charges (absent a maintenance agreement) are currently $100 for the first hour (which includes travel time), and $70 for each hour thereafter (based on quarter hour increments), plus materials. Labor costs are certain to increase over the next year. Both FUJITSU (manufacturer of the switching equipment) and GTE (our current maintenance supplier), agree that although the current equipment can be maintained, replacement parts are no longer being manufactured. It is therefore expected, that future costs for replacement parts will increase as they become more difficult to procure. Over the last year, telephone equipment repairs only (not including parts), would have cost the City $9000+. The final year of the Maintenance contract amounted to $5,904 ($492 per month, includes parts and labor). At their regularly scheduled meeting of February 27, 1990, the City Council adopted City Goals for 1991. One of those goals under a priority of (2), was to "establish telephone access to City Hall with human interface and option for direct dial". Analysis: In June 1991, Staff submitted a report regarding "...investigation into telephone access to City Hall, and [approval] in concept the purchase of new telephone switching equipment" to Council. Council's direction was to bring back in a year, with the general consensus being, no "cadillac systems". 1 lj Several problems (see exhibit A, page 2) are being experienced with the current switching system, that could be corrected with the purchase of a new switch. A new switch or a Centranet system, with Voice-Mail/Auto Attendant integration could satisfy the Council's direction, and enhance the City's ability to serve the public. However, with the current freeze on purchases, and the possibility that the financial picture will only slightly improve by August, an extended or new maintenance agreement is the most feasible of alternatives at this time. Two proposals were received (attached) to continue maintenance for one year; one from Fujitsu, and the other from GTE. The proposal from GTE is only $516.60 per month, only $24.60 per month more than the contract currently in-place. Fujitsu's proposal is significantly higher, $1022.55 per month, twice the GTE proposal. Selecting to approve the one (1) year maintenance agreement, versus resorting to "time and material" costs, represents an approximate $4000+ savings during the term of the contract. It is therefore recommended that the City Council approve the proposal from GTE, and direct Staff to continue investigating the available options in preparation for the 1993 expiration of the maintenance contract. Staff does feel, however, that serious consideration should been given to the purchase of a new switch or conversion to a Centranet system, as soon as funding becomes available. Staff will be utilizing the (1) year extension (expires in August 1993) to explore newly available equipment, and research funding sources, toward obtaining either a lease or purchase of new switching and key equipment, and to secure alternative proposals. Alternatives: 1. Approve the concept of a purchase/lease of new switching equipment, and direct Staff to return with an RFP for consideration, as a prelude to purchase/lease/rental of a new system. CONCUR: / , ji\ / ' Henry L. Staten, Acting General Services Director Steve Wisniewski, Acting City Manager Respectfully submitted to, Henry L. Staten, Acting General SServices Director by /Lex.--�i . L c . 7�i� Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Viki Cop land, Director Finance Department 2 EXHIBIT A May 29, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 11, 1991 RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT REPORT REGARDING INVESTIGATION INTO TELEPHONE ACCESS TO CITY OFFICES, AND APPROVE IN CONCEPT THE PURCHASE OF NEW TELEPHONE SWITCHING EQUIPMENT Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council 1. Accept the following report regarding telephone access to city offices; and, 2. Approve the concept of purchasing/lease of new telephone switching equipment, including Voice Mail and Automated Attendant. Background: At their regularly scheduled meeting of February 27, 1990, the City Council adopted City Goals for 1991. One of those goals under a priority of (2), was to "establish telephone access to city hall with human interface and option for direct dial". In October of 1987, City offices converted to a Direct -in -Dial, DID, telephone system, from its long-standing use of a switchboard and operator. The rationale was to save an estimated $20,000 per year, by eliminating the need for an employee to be dedicated to this position. Analysis: The City began leasing the current switching equipment in 1978. The expected life -span of this type of equipment is 10-15 years. The City purchased the telephone switching and key equipment in August of 1987 for a cost of $13,000+, with a maintenance contract (over a total of five (5) years) amounting to $22,000+. At the time of the buy-out of the current system, the remaining lease period of four (4) years represented a cost figure of over $71,000. This included the PBX Focus II, switchboard, maintenance contract, and station equipment. Both FUJITSU (manufacturer of the switching equipment) and GTE, agree that although the current switching equipment can be maintained, replacement parts are no longer being manufactured. It is therefore anticipated that the future cost for these parts will increase as they become more difficult to procure. The current maintenance contract will expire in August 1992, at which time all repair calls will be charged on a "time and material" basis. Repair charges are currently $100 for the first hour, and $70 for each hour thereafter, plus materials. Labor costs are certain to increase during the next year. Over the last year, telephone equipment repairs would have cost the City approximately $6,500. Our current maintenance contract cost is -1- 1i $5,626 for fiscal year '90/'91, and will increase to $5,904 for the final year of the contract '91/92. Other problems associated with the current telephone equipment are as follows: 1. Pooled Secretary Over the past two years, it has been estimated that approximately 18% of the pooled secretary's time, is spent answering incoming calls to the City Hall Directory. This represents approximately $6,000 of the position's salary, including benefits, etc. Over the past 3 1/2 years this has resulted in an estimated cost savings of approximately $45,000 (actual salaries and DID costs deducted). It has also created an estimated loss of 18% in employee productivity due to the time spent answering the directory calls. 2. Friday Coverage Although City Offices are closed on Fridays, City Hall personnel, on a rotating basis share answering the City's telephones on Fridays. The primary listed telephone numbers for each department are forwarded to a single line, to be answered by the person scheduled to work that Friday. Occasionally, this can cause the citizen to receive a busy signal as the one incoming line is in use, or the call may be switched between phones in a particular "Hunt" group and will continue to ring unless the employee is proximate to the telephone and can physically pick it up. 3. Police Department The Police Department has requested that the Telecommunications Liaison, inquire into possible solutions to a problem they are experiencing: unanswered phone calls; misplaced, miswritten, or illegible messages; loss of or delay in receiving critical or important information. This problem occurs due to the fact that the bulk of the personnel in the Police Department, in the performance of their duties, spend a majority of their time out of the office and/or away from their phones. Those few individuals, whose duties either require them to work primarily in the office, and/or who may be in the office when the phone rings, are unable to adequately respond to the inundation of calls. After speaking with GTE, GTEL, FUJITSU, VOICE HOST, DIAL -PRO, COM CONSULTANTS, and MICROLOG, staff determined the currently available options for the City to be as follows: 1. Purchase/lease a new telephone system which would include Auto Attendant/Voice-mail, or the capability to integrate at a later date. Cost: $40,000 to $100,000+. 2. Removal of all City switching equipment in favor of the GTE Centranet system, or comparable. "- 3. Upgrade the system to include the ability to interface with Voice-Mail/Auto Attendant. ;The current switching equipment -2- will not support an integrated or interfaced Voice Mail system. The system would have to be a "stand-alone", separate from the PBX, which would require a separate telephone number for the voice mail system, and require the callers to know the voice mail extension(s) of the person being called. Cost: approximately $20,000. An upgrade from pulse (rotary) to tone for all outgoing and incoming calls will be included for the above listed options. This upgrade will eliminate the "lag -time" experienced between when a call is touched in, and when the phone on the other end begins ringing. This is most apparent when dialing long distance phone numbers. A description of the proposed VOICE -MAIL, AUTOMATED ATTENDANT and CENTRANET systems are as follows: VOICE -MAIL is a system of message "boxes", whereby a caller can leave a recorded message for the party they are attempting to reach. This can be done either automatically; i.e. the person pre-programs their box to answer all calls; or only when busy or when there is no answer; or, anyone answering the phone can transfer the caller to the box to leave a message. Messages can be retrieved from any touch-tone telephone. This application can be beneficial to the Police Department, Building Inspectors, the Business License Inspector, Community Resources, Personnel, etc. AUTOMATED ATTENDANT features a primary answering greeting. Callers are greeted by the system, and then "talked -through" a menu of departments and/or areas that can be accessed via the touch-tone key pad numbers on their telephone. The caller can be prompted through several "menus"; automated information "bulletin boards"; dial the extension number of the person they are calling; default to a live operator; etc. CENTRANET, is a system whereby the switching equipment is removed from the City premises, and all hardware and software (excepting the key equipment [telephones]) is housed, maintained and upgraded at the local Telephone Company's Central Office for a monthly fee. The City would pay an initial connection fee of approximately $3,000, a flat monthly service charge per"line of $14.10 (approximately $2,000), and monthly access charges of approximately $900. These costs however do not include either Voice Mail or Automated Attendant features. Voice Mail is scheduled to be available in June or July, Auto Attendant would have to be purchased separately and maintained on our premises. Cost: Centranet only, approximately $2900/month. Through these types of systems, callers would be given options for normal working hours. By a simple step process the caller may speak with the City's designated operator, access the desired voice mail -box to leave a message, or receive specific, recorded City information. If the caller wishes to go back to the operator they may press "0" at any time for further option selections. During City off hours and on Fridays, the caller would be greeted after the first ring with a cheerful message, informing them that the City is closed. The caller may then leave a message for a -3- specific department/employee, or "walk-thru" the menu to receive current City. information. The public has expressed mixed feelings regarding the use of these systems. Time, use, and experience: have created use -specific applications, which are much more "friendly" than those currently in use by other entities. Staff does not recommend that the City "add-on" these features to the existing switching equipment, or merely ".upgrade" to the next model. The switching equipment is thirteen (13) years old, and soon to be unmaintainable, even on a time and material basis. Due to the age of this equipment and the lack of materials, significant "down time" could be realized, resulting in loss of service to the public. Although no funds are currently budgeted, funds should be earmarked to provide for the purchase/lease of newer, maintainable, and usable equipment, preferably coinciding with the expiration of the maintenance contract in 1992. Should the City Council approve the concept of purchase/lease of a new system, staff then should be further directed to investigate the numerous vendors offering new switching equipment and their compatibility with Voice Mail/Automated Attendant, as a prelude to a decision authorizing requests for bids. Consideration should also be given to the hiring of a consultant to evaluate the needs specific to the City. Alternatives: 1. Re-establish the switchboard. 2. Purchase answer machines for each station (extension). 3. Hire a consultant to identify and recommend future needs. CONCUR: e y L. Staten, Acting Director General Services Department evin B. North raft, City Manager Steve Wisniewski, Public Safety Director -4- Respectfully submitted, Henry L. Staten, Acting Director General Services Department by ca Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide GTEL 0013 COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FORM 90004870 (6/91) BILLING INFORMATION: P. 0. Number: Tax Id Number: Billing Contact: Telephone: Address: 1315 VALLEY DR HERMOSA BCH, CA 90254 REPAIR SERVICE INFORMATION: Service Commencement Date: 08/21/92 Renewal Date: 08/21/93 Repair Service Telephone: (800) 258-7861 Response For Major Failures: 2 Hours Form: 9000 1564-A 007792 * Page 1 of 2 Customer Name: HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL ** Customer Id: Z3400000049 Proposal Number: PP04165 Proposal Expiration: 07/21/92 CONTRACT PROPOSED BY: Account Executive: DIANNA CAMPBELL Telephone: (805-379-6483 Address: 3500 WILLOW LANE WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361 EQUIPMENT LOCATION: Contact: Telephone: Address: MICHELLE TERCERO (310) 318-0257 540 PIER AV HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 This Maintenance Agreement is made between GTEL and HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL ** (hereinafter referred to as "Customer") for GTEL to maintain Customer's communication system (the "System"). The maintenance services ("Services") and the terms and conditions under which the Services are performed are specified in Attachment A (Description of Services and Terms and Conditions). The location of the equipment covered under this agreement is specified above. The equipment covered (Equipment List) under this agreement is specified below. The Service will be provided according to the Hours of Coverage selected below. EQUIPMENT LIST: ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS 1 EQUIPMENT COVERED BY 2 MAINTENANCE: 3 FOCUS PABX AND ASSOCIATED 4 KEY TELEPHONES AND SINGLE 5 LINE EQUIPMENT. 6 OFFICE HOURS COVERAGE 7 BILLED MONTHLY 8 516.60 8 THIS IS A TERM CONTRACT 9 TO BE EFFECTIVE FROM 10 8-1-92 THRU 7-31-93 ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION FOCUS PABX SYSTEM (INCLUDED ITEMS) 11 140 PORTS - FULL COVERAGE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT ATTACHMENT A DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES AND TERMS AND CONDITIONS (Page 2 of 2) PART II - GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: GTEL'S LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, SHALL NOT EXCEED THE TOTAL MAINTENANCE CHARGE FOR ONE YEAR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, AND UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL GTEL BE RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE FOR INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, NOTWITHSTANDING THEIR FORESEEABILITY OR DISCLOSURE BY CUSTOMER TO GTEL, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES ARISING FROM DELAY, LOS=S OF DATA, PROFITS OR GOODWILL. GTEL SHALL BEAR NO LIABILITY FOR USE OF EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS OR DEVICES. IN CONNECTION WITH THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY THE PARTIES RECOGNIZE THAT GTEL MAY FROM TIME TO TIME PROVIDE ADVICE, MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS OR SUPPLY OTHER ANALYSIS RELATED TO THE EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES DESCRIBED IN THIS AGREE- MENT, AND, WHILE GTEL SHALL USE ITS BEST EFFORTS IN THIS REGARD THE CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL APPLY TO PRO- VISION OF SUCH ADVICE, RECOMMENDATIONS AND ANALY- SIS. 2. PAYMENT TERMS: GTEL shall invoice Customer for the Services plus applicable taxes. Payments are due upon receipt of invoice and are late thirty (30) days following the invoice date. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, if full payment is not received within forty-five (45) days of the invoice date, GTEL may cease performing its obligations hereunder. Additionally, Customer agrees to pay interest on any balance past due more than thirty (30) days at one and one-half (11/2) percent per month (not to exceed the maximum rate allowed under state law). (This late payment provision shall not apply to a governmental entity.) 3. USE OF CUSTOMER'S PURCHASE ORDERS: Customer may issue a purchase order or similar document in conjunction with this Agreement or for future orders of goods and services under this Agreement. Such order will become effective solely to specify goods and services when accepted by GTEL. Such acceptance shall not vary any of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. The terms and conditions contained in this Agreement take precedence over the terms and conditions of such a purchase order or other document issued by Customer, and Customer's signature on this Agree- ment constitutes an express acknowledgement of such precedence. 4. CONSENT: Customer shall obtain any consent from lessors, lenders, or other third parties necessary for GTEL to perform Services under this Agreement. 5. ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS: Customer shall provide all ventilating, heat- ing, cooling, humidity, power and dust control necessary to ensure that the System location meets applicable environmental requirements for the System. The location shall be dry, free of dust and of conditions injurious to employees or agents of GTEL, and to the equipment. Customer shall provide electrical service with suitable terminals where required and installed metallic grounds. If installation or operation of the System requires construction of additional facilities, Customer shall be responsible for attendant costs. Specific environmental considerations defined by the equipment manufacturer or by GTEL which are more stringent than the general requirements noted in this section will be included as an attachment to this Agreement, and Customer agrees to provide facilities which meet such requirements. GTEL shall not be responsible for any System failure or malfunction ultimately determined to be attributable to nonconformity with environmental specifications. 6. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES: Except as disclosed in writing to GTEL and acknowl- edged in writing by GTEL, Customer certifies that Customer is not aware of the presence of any asbestos or other hazardous substance, as defined by any applicable state, federal or local hazardous waste or environmental protection law, as enacted or subsequently amended, at any of Customer's locations where GTEL is to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. If during the performance of its obligation under this Agreement GTEL employees or agents encounter any such substance, Customer agrees to take whatever steps are necessary, at its own expense, to remove or contain the asbestos or other hazardous substance and to test the premises to ensure that exposure does not exceed the lowest exposure limit for the protection of workers. Removal or containment shall comply with all applicable laws or regulations, and GTEL agents and employees shall not be required to continue performance under this Agreement until the removal or contain- ment has been completed and approved by the appropriate governmental agency and GTEL. Performance obligations under this Agreement shall be extended day for day for the delay caused by said cleanup or removal. Customer's failure to remove or contain hazardous substances shall be sufficient justification for GTEL to terminate this Agree- ment without further liability. In the event of such termination, Customer agrees to reimburse GTEL for expenses incurred in performing this Agreement until termination. 7. INDEMNIFICATION: GTEL will indemnify and hold Customer harmless (not limited to the amount of maintenance charges for one year) from liabilities, claims or demands arising out of personal injury or death or damage to property to the extent proximately caused by the negligence of GTEL's employees or subcontractors in performing services under this Agreement. This indemnity applies where GTEL's negligence is either the sole or a contributing cause of the injury, death or damage. This indemnity does not extend to any portion of the injury, death or damage caused by either the sole or the contributing negligence of Customer or third parties. GTEL's indemnity obligation with respect to damage to the System is limited to the repair or replacement, at GTEL's option, of the damaged items. 8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR RELATIONSHIP : GTEL is an independent con- tractor under this Agreement. The persons provided by GTEL shall not be considered employees of the Customer. 9. LIMITATION OF ACTIONS: No action, regardless of form, arising out of the subject matter of this Agreement, may be brought by either party more than two (2) years after the cause of action has accrued. The parties waive the right to invoke any different limitation on the bringing of actions provided under state law. 10. DELAYED PERFORMANCE: In the event performance of this Agreement, or any obligation hereunder, is prevented, restricted or interfered with by reason of acts of God, wars, revolution, civil commotion, acts of public enemy, embargo, acts of the Govern ment in its sovereign capacity, labor difficulties, including without limitation, strikes, slowdowns, picketing or boycotts, unavailability of equipment or parts from vendor, changes re- quested by Customer, or any other circumstances beyond the reasonable control and without the fault or negligence of the party affected, the party affected, upon giving prompt notice to the other party, shall be excused from such performance on a day-to-day basis to the extent of such prevention, restriction, or interference (and the other party shall likewise be excused from performance of its obligations on a day-to-day basis until the delay, restriction or interference has ceased), provided, however, that the party so af- fected shall use its best reasonable efforts to avoid or remove such causes of nonper- formance and both parties shall proceed whenever such causes are removed or cease. 11. DEFAULT: If either party refuses or fails properly to perform any material obligation under this Agreement, or violates any of the material terms or conditions of this Agree- ment, such refusal, failure or violation shall constitute a default. In such event, the non -defaulting party may so notify the other party in writing of the default and allow that party a period of thirty (30) calendar days to cure such default. IF THE DEFAULTING PARTY DOES NOT CURE SUCH DEFAULT WITHIN SAID THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS, THE NON -DEFAULTING PARTY SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO TERMINATE THIS AGREEMENT UPON WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE OTHER PARTY AND SEEK ALL APPROPRIATE LEGAL AND / OR LEGAL REMEDIES. 12. ASSIGNMENT: Customer may not assign this Agreement without GTEL's written consent. 13. WAIVER: The failure of either party to insist upon the performance of any provision of this Agreement, or to exercise any right or privilege granted to it under this Agreement, shall not be construed as a waiver of such provision or any provisions of this Agreement, and the same shall continue in full force. To be effective, any waiver by either party of a default in the performance by the other party must be in writing, and any such written waiver shall not be construed to be a waiver of any preceding or subsequent default not specifically described therein. If any action by either party shall require the consent or approval of the other party, the grant of such consent or approval shall not be deemed a consent to or approval of any other action. The various rights and remedies given to or reserved by either party by this Agreement, or allowed by law, shall be cumulative, and no delay or omission to exercise any of its rights shall be construed as a waiver of any default or acquiescence, nor shall any waiver of any breach or any other provision be considered a condonement of any continuing or subsequent breach of the same provision. 14. NOTICE: Notices required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be sent by a method which obtains a written receipt. Notices shall be sent to the address listed on the front of this Agreement until such address is changed by written notice. 15. GOVERNING LAW; VENUE: This Agreement is to be governed and construed according to the substantive law of the state of California. Customer consents to personal jurisdiction in california and the parties further agree that proper venue shall be there. 16. SEVERABILITY: Any provision of this Agreement prohibited by law in the state where accepted by GTEL shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition without invalidating the remaining provisions of this Agreement, unless the general intent of the Agreement would be negated. 17. SECTION HEADINGS: The section headings in this Agreement are for convenience only and do not constitute any part of this Agreement and shall not be considered in its interpretation. 18. AMENDMENTS, MODIFICATIONS AND SUPPLEMENTS: The term "this Agree- ment" shall include future amendments, modifications and supplements. Any amend- ment, modification, supplement or change to this Agreement, to include pen and ink annotations to the typed or printed text, must be in writing and signed (pen and ink annotations to be initialed) by the authorized representatives of the parties, which, for GTEL, is the individual authorized to accept this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreement, including attachments, constitutes the entire agreement of the parties pertaining to the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior agreements, negotiations, proposals and representations, whether written or oral, concerning such subject matter. No representations, understandings, agreements or warranties, express or implied, have been made or relied upon in the making of this Agreement other than those specifically set forth. . FUJITSU BUSINESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS 6160 Bristol Parkway, Culver City, CA 90230 Tel: (310) 417-9600 Fax: (310) 417-9690 MARCH 11, 1992 MS. MICHELE TECERO CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA. 90254-3885 DEAR MICHELE: THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SERVICE YOUR TELECOMMUNICATION NEEDS. FURSU BASED ON THE WALK THRU CONDUCTED ON 1/28/92, I CAN PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT PRICING: CITY HALL LOCATION ONE CABINET, FOCUS II PBX WITH FEATURE PACKAGE 8 SOFTWARE 112 STATION LINE PORTS 20 BOTHWAY TRUNK PORTS 10 "DID" TRUNK PORTS 1 CONSOLE 1 1A2 KSU 33 KSU LINE CARDS 49 SINGLE LINE TELEPHONES 23 6 BUTTON 1A2 TELEPHONES 12 10 BUTTON 1A2 TELEPHONES COMMUNITY CENTER 1 CA ill CA 4.00 4.00 4.00 55.00 20.00 3.65 1.00 1.95 1.95 $448.00 80.00 40.00 55.00 20.00 120.45 49.00 44.85 23.40 MONTHLY TOTAL = $880.70 1A2 KSU KSU LINE CARDS 6 BUTTON 1A2 TELEPHONES 10 BUTTON 1A2 TELEPHONES OFF PREMISE EXTENSIONS 1301 BARD ST. LOCATION @ 20.00 @ 3.65 @ 1.95 @ 1.95 @ 3.65 MONTHLY TOTAL 1 SINGLE LINE TELEPHONE 1 OFF PREMISE EXTENSION = $ 20.00 = 18.25 = 9.75 = 5.85 = 18.25 $ 72.10 @ 1.00 = $1.00 @ 3.65 = 3.65 = $4.65 MONTHLY TOTAL FUITTSU 500 4TH ST. LOCATION 1 SINGLE LINE TELEPHONE @ 1.00 = $1.00 1 OFF PREMISE EXTENSION @ 3.65 = 3.65 MONTHLY TOTAL = $4.65 FIELD SERVICE LOCATION 9 SINGLE LINE TELEPHONES @ 1.00 =$ 9.00 9 OFF PREMISE EXTENSION @ 3.65 = 32.85 MONTHLY TOTAL =$41.85 CITY YARD 4 SINGLE LINE TELEPHONES @ 1.00 = $ 4.00 4 OFF PREMISE EXTENSIONS @ 3.65 = 14.60 SUMMARY CITY HALL COMMUNITY CENTER 1301 BARD ST. 500 4TH ST. FIELD SERVICE CITY YARD MONTHLY TOTAL = $18.60 $ 880.70 72.10 4.65 4.65 41.85 18.60 MONTHLY TOTAL $1,022.55 THERE ARE CIRCUITS LOCATED IN THE BASEMENT OF CITY HALL WHICH WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN (PIER STROBE LIGHTS, FOG HORN, PIER RING DOWN, FIRE PAGE, FIRE LIGHTS AND OTHERS). IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL ME AT 310-417-9650. SINCERELY, 5EPH N. VIVOLO SERVICE MANAGER ca FUJITSU FUJITSU BUSINESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS Field Service Contract Administration 4605 E. Elwood, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (602) 921-5900 FAX: (602) 921-4610 DATE ISSUED BRANCH OFFICE LOCATION NO. r BILL TO L (INCLUDE COMPLETE CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE INFORMATION) r INSTALL AT 1 L J MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT ❑ NEW CONTRACT PAGE OF • RENEWAL CONTRACT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT NO. MASTER AGREEMENT NO. CUSTOMER NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE EXPR. DATE CUSTOMER NAME AND TELEPHONE NO. CUSTOMER SALES TAX STATUS ATTACH N EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE ) II TAXABLE • TAXANOBLE SHIFT COVERAGE OPTIONS DAYS HOURS SERVICE ZONE OF INSTALLATION LOCATION IS: • 5 MON-FRI III 0000-1700 • 6 MON-SAT • 0700-2400 TYPE OF SERVICE ONLY • 7 MON-SUN • 0700.0669 • SWITCH MAINTENANCE INCLUDING HOLIDAYS • OTHER EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION PRODUCT CODE PRODUCT NOMENCLATURE/DESCRIPTION MONTHLY MAINTENANCE CHARGE PER UNIT QUANTITY MAINTENANCE NIARGE CUSTOMER AGREES THAT THE AGREEMENT HAS BEEN READ AND UNDERSTOOD, INCLUDING TERMS AND CONDITIONS ATTACHED HERETO. ACCEPTED AND AGREED 10 'TOTAL CHARGES CHARGES SHOWN DO NOT INCLUDE TAXES. CHARGES ARE SUBJECT 10 SITE INVENTORY CHANGES. AUTHORIZED CUSTOMER SIGNATURE THIS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT IS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY FBCS CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR. FBCS REPRESENTATIVE NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) DATE FBCS AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE FBCS-21B 11/89 TITLE TITLE Distribution: (WHITE)—FBCS Contract File: (YELLOW)—Customer Copy: (PINK)—Retained By Customer: (GOLDENROD)—Branch Office Copy HF r . 14 _ 14:4 1-9.7-1-4- U. HREH FEDI ihl TALES April 14, 1992 Ms. Michelle Tercero Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Ms. Tercero: TELS0 -tzi57 PAGE 02 GTEL 3500 Willow Lane Thousand Oaks, CA 91361 In Reply Refer To DC4260-M33 Thousand Oaks, CA Thank you for sharing information with me regarding the City of Hermosa Beach. GTEL/GTE is now aware of the budgetary constraints facing your City in this difficult economic climate. A decrease in the tax base has impacted many local governments and curtailed services to their citizens. GTEL also has been forced to make a business decision regarding costly maintenance for technologically obsolete equipment. Despite the fact that maintenance of your equipment was to have been discontinued in August of this year, I have been able to obtain approval from Corporate in Dallas for an exception to maintain your switch for yet another year. GTEL has developed an Imbedded Base Plan (IBP) to assist our customers in upgrading their outdated equipment. I am pleased that you and Mr. Staten have decided to pursue IBP offerings with GTEL/GTE. The SBCS switching system with telephone instruments was demonstrated to you both in our Telecommunications Center in Thousand Oaks on April 6th. Of the estimated $1500 per month, $500 would be displaced by your current maintenance contract, resulting in only an additional $1,000 each month to upgrade your system. The SBCS also carries a manufacturer's rebate of $1,000. In addition, we have received approval to include the second through fifth year maintenance in the lease purchase price as you requested. Corporate in Dallas is now in the process of of obtaining pricing for the new switch maintenance that can now be included in the total lease package. Thank you again for your interest in our products and services. GTEL/GTE is pleased to work toward our best offering and continued support for the City of Hermosa Beach telecommunications solutions. Dianna L. Campbell Senior Account Executive SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION J CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM - s TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FROM: Michael Schubach, Planning}fdctor `: SUBJECT: Adoption of the Resolution for the Condominium Project at 2902 Hermosa Avenue DATE: April 7, 1992 Attached is the resolution prepared by City Attorney pursuant to City Council's action on March 24, 1992 denying, without prejudice, a condominium project at 2902 Hermosa Avenue. Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager p/memo4 lk 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO CONSTRUCT A TWO UNIT ATTACHED CONDOMINIUM UPON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2902 HERMOSA AVENUE. WHEREAS, on March 24, 1992 the City Council held public hearings to consider a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Tentative Parcel Map to construct a two unit attached condominium upon property located at 2902 Hermosa Avenue; and WHEREAS, numerous persons spoke at the hearings in favor of and against the granting of the Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the evidence presented which includes, but is not limited to: 1. The various staff reports 2. Letters and petitions from residents of the city 3. Statements in favor and in opposition 4. Oral testimony presented at the hearing 5. Relevant provisions of the Municipal Code Section 1. The City Council finds that: 1. The intensity and the type of the development including, but not limited to, height and open space is not in character with the development standards of the surrounding area. 2. There is little probability that the proposed project will be consistent with the height limitations in multi -family residential zones currently being studied. 3. The lot coverage varies with the literal nterpretation of the zoning code requirements. 4. Due to the proximity of R-1 and R-2 Zones to the subject property, the requested development at the height and lot coverage ratio proposed is likely to interfere with the property values in the vicinity or interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in such area. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 2. In view of all of the evidence and based on the foregoing findings, the City Council concludes as follows: 1. The site for the proposed use is not adequate in size, shape and circumstances to accommodate the project as proposed. 2. The type of development proposed is not consistent with the surrounding neighborhood and would negatively impact the neighborhood's integrity and the character of the community. 3. The intensity of the proposed project will have an adverse effect upon the use and enjoyment of adjacent property and upon the public welfare. 4. Any of the above conclusions, independent from the others, is sufficient grounds to deny the granting of the subject approvals. Section 3. In view of all of the evidence, and based on the foregoing findings and conclusions, the City Council hereby decides as follows: 1. The application for a Precise Development Plan is hereby denied without prejudice to reducing the height of the building to 30 feet or under and increasing the open space. 2. The application for issuance of a Conditional Use Permit is hereby denied without prejudice as set forth above. 3. The application for a Tentative Parcel Map is hereby denied without prejudice as set forth above. 4. The applicant shall be notified of this action by mail. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause the same to be processed in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this day of , 1992. President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: City Clerk AP V60 I T FO Ott ( torney 14 GARVIN F SHALLENBERGER ME5 R MOORS• PAuL REDERIC MART• WILLIAM R KIEL RICHARD A. CURNUTT LEONARD A HAMPEL JOHN a HURLBUT JR MICHAEL wimMELL MILFORD w. DAHL, JR HEODORE 3wALLACE. JR .• RONALD P ARRINGTON RICHARD P 5195 MARSHALL M PEARLMAN• ROBERT C. BRAUN ROGER A. GRABLE• EDWARO D. 5013ESMA, JR.• THOMAS 5 5ALINGER• ROBERT W ALBERTS DAVID C. LARSEN• CLIFFORD E. FRIEDEN MICHAEL D. RUBIN IRA G. RIVIN• JEFFREY M. ODERMAN• JOSEPH D. CARRUTH STAN WOLCOTT• ROBERT 5. BOWER OAVIO J ALE5HIRE MARCiA A. FMR5YTH WILLIAM M ARTICORENA JAMES L MORRIS ANNE NELSON LANPHAR WILLIAM J. CAPLAN MICHAEL T HORNAK JANICE L. CELOTTI HILIP D KOHN JOEL D. KUPERBERG STEVEN A NICHOLS THOMAS G BROCKINGTON WILLIAM W YNDER EVRIDIKI (VICKI/ DALLAS RANOALL M. BABBU5H MARY M. GREEN PHILIP MPRINCE THOMAS J. CRANE JOHN L. FELLOWS 111 MARK B. FRAZIER KARIN T. KROGIUS 14. KATHERINE JENSON DUKE F. WAHLOUIST RICHARD G. MONTEVIDEO LORI SARNER SMITH ERNE5T W. KLATTE, 111 RUTAN & TUCKER ATTORNEYS AT LAW A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS BANK OF THE WEST. SUITE 1400 611 ANTON BOULEVARO COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-1998 OIRECT ALL MAIL TO: P. O. BOX 1950 COSTA MESA. CALIFORNIA 92626-1950 TELEPHONE (714) 641-5100 (213) 625-7586 TELECOPIER (714) 546-9035 w RUTAN 11880-19721 JAMES B. TUCKER. 5R 11888-19501 MILFORD W. DAHL. 5R. 11919-19881 H. RODGER HOWELL 11925-19831 April 10, 1992 VIA MESSENGER Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: 2902 Hermosa Avenue Owners: Douglas A. & Cheryl Clark Dear Ms. Doerfling: The enclosed letter to the Mayor and Councilmembers relates to a matter that is on the Council's agenda for the April 14, 1992, meeting. I would appreciate it if you would distribute this letter to the City Council so that they will be able to review it prior to the meeting. ELIZABETH L. HANNA DAVID H HOCHNER SCOTT NZONE MARK SM TH FLYNN JAm ES P NERTY KATHY FORBATH ESFAHAN DAVID B COSGROVE M D. THOMPSON JAYNE TAyLOR KACER ANS VNLIGTEN m ATTHEWK ROSS STEPHEN A ELLIS JEFFREY wERTHEIMER MICHAEL D. TURNER ROBERT O. OWEN ADAM N VOLKERT JEFFREY A. GOLDFARB SANFORD 5HAT2 KEVIN BRAZIL LAYNE H MELZER L. SKI HARRISON STEVEN W. SPRECHER SARAH J KNECHT DAN SLATER PAMELA J. ROBERTS JAMES 5. WEISZ JAMES R ROUSE CAROL L. DEMMCER STEWART PRESSMAN P•TRICK D. MCCALLA I RICHARD HOWELL • PATRICK 914902 SUSAN K MEYER, SHEILA R. VAZQUEZ RUTH ANN CRANDALL ELLEN S. BANCROFT ROBERT E. HENKE FRANK W. BATTAILE CARRIE E. PHELAN AVEN 5 PETERSEN MELISSA G. DANT ARK A. THOMP50N JAMES G. KAY DEBBIE L. HUENNEKEN5 PAUL J. SIEVERS KAREN MEYER5 JANE GRILLIOT KAREN BURKE 5. DANIEL HARBOTTLE OAVINA F. HAIMOv INA RAILEANU PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ADMITTED IN NEW YORK AND WASHINGTON. O.C. ONLY DAVID J. GARIBALDI, III OF COUNSEL i-- .2• City (:Ip; k ` City of Hermosa bench Thank JMO:jd Enclosure you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, RUTAN & TUCKER 6,6A4,21/1effrey M. Oderman 9/112/014861-0001/002 SUPPLEMENTAL 1 k INFORMATION GARVIN F SHALLENBERGER JAMES R MOORE• PAUL FREDERIC MARX• WILLIAM R. BIEL RICHARD A. CURNUTT LEONARD A. HAMPEL JOHN Et HURLBUT, JR MICHAEL w MELL MILFORD W. DAHL. JR. THEODORE 1 WALLACE. JR .• RONALD P. ARRINGTON RICHARD P. 5105 MARSHALL M. PEARLMAN' ROBERT C. BRAUN ROGER A. GRABLE• EDWARD 0 5YBE5MA. JR• THOMAS 5. SALINGER• ROBERT W ALBERTS DAVID C. LARSEN• CLIFFORD E. FRIEDEN MICHAEL 0. RUBIN 10A G. RIVIN• JEFFREY M. ODERMAN• JOSEPH 0. CARRUTH STAN WOLCOTT• ROBERT 5. BOWER DAVID J AL` SHIRE A CIA A ORSTTH CORENA JAMES LL MORRIS ANNE NELSON LANPHAR LIAM J CAPLAN MICHAEL T HORNAK • NICE L. CELOTTI JHILIP 0 KOHN OEL 0 KUPERBERG STEVEN A NICHOLS THOMAS G. BROCKINGTON WILLIAM W NDER EVRIDIKI IVICKII DALLAS • NDALL M. BABOUSH MARY M GREEN PHILIP m PRINCE THOMAS J. CRANE JOHN L. FELLOWS NI MARK B. FRAZIER KARIN T KROGIUS Al KATHERINE JENSON WAHLOUIST • F. HLOUIST RICHARD G. MONTEVIDEO LORI SARNER SMITH ERNE5T W KLATTE, 111 RUTAN St TUCKER ATTORNEYS AT LAW A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS BAND OF THE WEST, SUITE 1400 611 ANTON BOULEVARO COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-1998 OIRECT ALL MAIL TO. P. 0 BOX 1950 COSTA MESA. CALIFORNIA 92628-1950 TELEPHONE (714) 641-5100 (2131 625-7586 TELECOPIER (714) 546-9035 RUTAN 11800-19721 MES B. TUCKER. 50 11888-19501 ,FORD W. DAHL. SR. 11919-19881 ROOGER HOWELL 119 25-19 831 April 10, 1992 Mayor Kathleen Midstokke and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive 4, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ELIZABETH L HANNA DAVID H HOCHNER SCOTT R PINZONE MARK SMITH FLYNN • MES P FiNERTY • FORBATH ESFAHAN DAVID B. COSGROVE M D THOMP505 JAYNE TAYLOR KACER ANS VAN LISTEN MATTHEW K ROSS STEPHEN A. ELLIS JEFFREY WERTHEIMER MICHAEL D. TURNER ROBERT 0 OWEN ADAM N VOLKERT JEFFREY A. GOLDFARB SANFORD SHATZ • KEVIN BRAZIL LAYNE H MELZER L SKI HARRISON STEVEN W. SPRECHER SARAH J. KNECHT D AN SLATER PAMELA J. ROBERTS J AMES 5. WEISZ JAMES R. ROUSE CAROL L. OEMMIER STEWART PRESSMAN RATRICK D. MCCALLA RICHARD K HOWELL • PATRICK MUNOZ SUSAN K. MEYER, SHEILA R. VAZQUEZ RUTH ANN CRANDALL ELLEN 5. BANCROFT ROBERT E. HENKE FRANK W. BATTAILE CARRIE E. PHELAN OVEN 5. PETERSEN MELISSA G. GIANT MARK A. THOMP50N • MES G. KAY DEBBIE L. HUENNEKENS PAUL J. SIEVERS KAREN MEYER5 JANE GRILLIOT KAREN BURKE 1 5. DANIEL ARBOTTLE DAVINA F. HAIMOV INA RAILEANU • PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 'AOMITTEO IN NEW YORK ANO WASHINGTON. D.C. ONLY DAVID J. GARIBALDI, I11 OF COUNSEL Re: 2902 Hermosa Avenue; Appeal from Planning Commission Resolution No. 92-5 Approving Conditional Use Permit, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 20554, and Precise Development Plan for Two -Unit Condominium Project Dear Mayor Midstokke and Members of the City Council: I am writing on behalf of Douglas and Cheryl Clark, owners of the property located at 2902 Hermosa Avenue, Hermosa Beach. On behalf of the Clarks, I hereby request that the City Council reconsider the action taken on the above -referenced project at your March 24, 1992, meeting. I also request that you do not approve the draft resolution for this project which I understand was prepared by your City Attorney and which will be presented to the City Council for consideration at your April 14, 1992, meeting. I would appreciate it if the City Council considered this request prior to acting upon the draft resolution on April 14th. The Clarks maintain that their project as designed fully complies with all adopted development and building standards in the City of Hermosa Beach. RUTAN & TUCKER ATTORNEYS AT LAW ...Rrncsn,.INCLUoPNG .RorrssioN4L COR.OR.T!JNS Mayor Kathleen Midstokke and Members of the City Council April 10, 1992 Page 2 The grounds for this request for reconsideration are that the Clarks were denied their right to a fair hearing on March 24th. At no time during the several months that the Clarks' plans were reviewed being by the Planning Department were the Clarks or their architect informed that the project as designed conflicted with the City's lot coverage or open space standards. Indeed, the Planning Department repeatedly complimented the applicant and the applicant's architect for complying with all code requirements, including open space. The Planning Commission resolution approving the project also determined that the building fully complied. Even as late as the public hearing before the City Council on March 24th, no one suggested that the project violated any City codes. It was not until after the public hearing had closed that a Councilmember raised the issue of Code compliance. At that time, the Planning Director advised that the project complied with the lot coverage requirement based upon a formal Planning Commission interpretation that has been uniformly applied for seven years. Neither Mr. Clark nor Elizabeth Srour, the Clarks' representative, were given an opportunity to address the issue. Nevertheless, the City Council voted 3-1 to deny the project subject to preparation of a formal resolution embodying the Council's findings. The law is clear that the action of an administrative agency, when based on information, either in whole or in part, "of which the parties [or a party] were not apprised and which they had no opportunity to controvert amounts to denial of a hearing." English v. City of Long Beach (1950) 35 Ca1.2d 155, 158. An individual's right to a fair hearing is abridged by an agency's receipt of ex parte communications or additional evidence after the hearing has been closed. Action by the agency in such circumstances constitutes a denial of due process of law. See, e.g., La Prade v. Depart- ment of Water and Power (1945) 27 Ca1.2d 47, 51; Gore v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1980) 110 Cal.App.3d 184, 192. The Clarks maintain that it is arbitrary and capricious for the City to suddenly, and without notice, abandon a long- standing consistent official interpretation of the City's codes. It is also arbitrary for the Council to do so without even telling the property owner about the new interpretation RUTAN & TUCKER ATTORNEYS AT LAW A PARTNERS... INC LuOINO PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS Mayor Kathleen Midstokke and Members of the City Council April 10, 1992 Page 3 and giving him/her an opportunity to design the project in a manner that complies prior to expending thousands of dollars and several months relying upon the established interpre- tation. The Clarks are entitled to know how many other projects in the City have been routinely approved by the Planning Commission and City Council under different rules than the ones dreamed up after the public hearing was closed. It is apparent that the City is desperately searching for some basis to deny the Clarks' project on the ground of height, even though the height is in full compliance with the Code, and the Clarks have a statutory right (under Government Code § 66474.2) to have their project judged accordingly. It is noteworthy that even though the City Council refused to approve a moratorium on the height issue and split 2-2 on March 24th regarding the height issue on the Clarks' building (thereby upholding the Planning Commission approval on this point), the draft resolution prepared by your City Attorney's office repeatedly references the height of the building as a reason for denial. On behalf of the Clarks, I respectfully request that you give them a fair hearing, afford them equal treatment to other similarly situated property owners, affirm the decision of your own Planning Commission, and approve the plans as submitted. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, RUTAN & TUCKER -041t. OIL V Jeffrey M. Oderman JMO:jd cc: Douglas & Cheryl Clark Elizabeth C. Srour Charles S. Vose, Esq., City Attorney 9/112/014861-0001/001 April 6, 1992 -553/ HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL April 14, 1992 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #21279 (C.U.P. CON NO. 89-15) LOCATION: 1038 7TH STREET APPLICANT(S): JOHN M. FERRARO, ROBERT F. BAYER AND S. J. BAYER REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A 2 - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #21279 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #21279 at their August 1, 1989 meeting. The map was to expire on August 1, 1991, however, the applicant submitted an extension request before the expiration date and was granted a one year extension at the August 6, 1991 Planning Commission meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: Michae Schubach Planning Director Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager p/srfinmap Respectfully submitted, W Rober son Associate Planner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #21279 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1038 SEVENTH STREET, HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on April 14, 1992 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ _Dr public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 89-56 adop- ted after hearing on August 1, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #21279 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 14, Glorietta Villa Tract, as recorded in Book 9, Page 111 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 1038 7th Street, Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: AP'Rr' ED i"AS TO FORM: p/rsf inmap PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 1992. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY - 2 - April 6, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 14, 1992 REQUEST FOR 30 DAY EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT FOR THE ACTING GENERAL SERVICES DIRECTOR Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council extend for thirty (30) days the temporary appointment of the General Services Director. Background: The Acting General Services Director was appointed on May 22, 1991. Filling of this position is being held pending review of the organizational structure of the Parking Enforcement Division. Analysis: Section 2-33 of the Hermosa Beach City Code precludes a temporary appointment of an individual to a permanent Civil Service position for more than six months without approval from the City Council every thirty days. Respectfully submitted, Concur: Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director rab/extend - 1 - Steve S. Wisniewski Interim City Manager X-L-c-/dtk April 6, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 14, 1992 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 91-5 OBJECTIONABLE ODORS INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PURPOSE: TO DETERMINE THE MOST APPROPRIATE AND EFFECTIVE REGULATORY AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES FOR PREVENTING OBJECTIONABLE ODORS FROM EMANATING BEYOND THE POINT SOURCE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES Recommendation 1. The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the City Council, by minute order, authorize Planning Department and Fire Department staff to attend odor inspection training sessions conducted by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD). 2. Adopt the attached resolution of intent to initiate a text amendment requiring activated carbon absorption filtration systems for certain odor -producing businesses as noted in this report. Background The Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 91-56 at its regular meeting on September 17, 1991, recommending the City Council direct staff to study the impact of the release of vapors and fumes from businesses and to study the possible text amendments or enforcement procedures to address this problem. The City Council approved Resolution No. 91-5500 at its regular meeting on October 22, 1991, directing staff to investigate the impact of vapors and odors released from businesses and to study possible methods to monitor and control these vapors and odors, whether through enforcement of existing laws or through amendment of existing laws. At its regular meeting of January 21, 1992, the Planning Commission directed staff to obtain and present to the Commission more information relating to the cost, impact fees, training and enforcement areas of this Special Study. At its regular meeting of March 17, 1992, the Planning Commission passed a motion to: (1) request the City Council to authorize staff to attend AQMD training sessions; and (2) request the City Council to direct staff to prepare a text amendment on mandatory air filtration systems for consideration of inclusion within the Zoning Ordinance. Analysis See attached minutes and staff report from March 17, 1992 Planning Commission meeting. CONCUR • Michael Schubach Planning Director Attachments: Respectfully submitted, Cr.%'Cha1 t Ad anced Planner 1. Minutes of March 17, 1992 Planning Commission meeting 2. Staff report from March 17, 1992 Planning Commission meeting p/odor3 CITY MANAGER COMMENT: AQMD is the regulating agency and they are equipped and trained to handle such matters. It is my understanding that they have few, if any, complaints filed in Hermosa Beach with regard to odors or vapors. Although the training is free of charge, there will be a Toss of personnel from the fire shifts which will cause an overtime situation to cover the shift. Additionally, there will be overtime costs incurred for the fire personnel attending the training since they would be required to attend on many of their days off. In review of the background material, it is apparant that Hermosa Beach would merely be assisting the AQMD personnel and could take no independent enforcement action. To take on any added responsibility to assist or enforce something that is already governed and enforced by another agency is not in the best interest of the City and not financially prudent at this time of economic hardship wherein the City faces a shortfall of at least $1 million. I do not concur with the recommendation to furnish personnel at City expense to assist AQMD and recommend that Council leave the investigation and enforcement of these matters with AQMD where it belongs Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager/Director of Public Safety 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 92- A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO INITIATE A TEXT AMENDMENT TO REQUIRE FILTRATION SYSTEMS TO REDUCE OBJECTIONABLE ODOR EMISSIONS FROM CERTAIN BUSINESSES WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on April 14, 1992, to consider a text amendment to reduce the impacts of objectionable odors from certain businesses within the City and made the following findings: A. Previous B. staff studies indicate there are a number of businesses with the potential to create objectionable odor contamination to surrounding residential properties, e.g.auto painting establishments and restaurants with char -broiling facilities; The Planning Commission has identified activated carbon absorption filtration systems capable of eliminating over 90% of odor -producing air pollutants; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, directs staff to prepare a text amendment to require installation of activated carbon absorption filtration systems for certain types of business operations and begin the process for environmental assessment and public hearings. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 1992. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: p/persint CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY HEARINGS SS 91-5 -- EXAMINATION OF THE PROBLEM OF VAPORS AND ODORS DUE TO THE OPERATION OF BUSINESSES AND STUDY OF POSSIBLE METHODS FOR ALLEVIATING THE PROBLEM (continued from January 21, 1992 meeting). Recommended Action: To recommend: 1) that City Council authorize Staff to participate in the AQMD field training program, and 2) to set for public hearing for text amendment. Mr. Schubach gave the Staff Report, detailing the background and Staff's recommendations. He stated Staff had a.problem when the issue of enforcement was investigated: AQMD. legal staff was uncertain as to whether cities can or cannot enforce their ordinances and requested the City Attorney continue to examine the matter and present a Staff Report concerning that particular issue. This could be accomplished concurrent with the request for AQMD training of Staff. Mr. Schubach stated Staff had discovered inexpensive filtration systems do exist and would not impose on businesses if such a system were a requirement. He added that City Council must also approve AQMD training of Staff before training could commence. Hearing opened by Chmn. Ketz at 8:55 p.m. Jim Listener, 2715 Eloesty, discussed his concern relating to smoke emissions from restaurants and the necessity to wait for complaints. He suggested that guidelines were established that stated when the cooking equipment reached a certain point, an appropriate filtration system would be automatically required at the time it is being built. Mr. Listener noted an air filtration system requirement would then be regulated by C.U.P.'s and that restaurants currently do not have C.U.P.'s. Hearing closed by Chmn. Ketz at 8:58 p.m. Chmn. Ketz noted Staff had presented the information .regarding training which the Commission had requested and stated she supported AQMD training of Staff. Comm. Di Monda agreed the Planning Dept. and the Fire Dept. should be involved with the AQMD program, but did not feel the Building Dept. should be involved, other than with the filtration system requirement. Comm. Di Monda noted that if filtration systems were required, a method of inspections similar to the Fire Depts' current inspections should be included within the text amendment and made a part of the Fire Depts.' annual inspection process. Comm. Merl stated a C.U.P. for restaurants would not be required, but, instead, could be addressed within the Zoning Code. MOTION by Comm. Merl, seconded by Comm. Di Monda, to REQUEST the City Council to authorize Staff to attend AQMD training and that City Council REQUEST that Staff prepare a Text Amendment on the air filtration systems issue for consideration of inclusion within the P.C.Minutes 3/17/92 Zoning Code and that this be concurrent with the City Attorney's examination. The draft Text Amendment is not to be completed until Staff has completed AQMD training and is not to be presented to the Commission until the City Attorney's ruling has been heard. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl and Chmn. Ketz None None Comm. Suard S 92-1 -- SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO EXAMINE ALLOW E WAL► AND FENCE HEIGHTS ALONG THE SIDE STREET LINES OF CORNER LO Recomm-.ded Action: To set for public hearing for text amen and REVISED MEMO•.' DUM REGARDING FENCING AT 1947 VALLEY DR E. Recommended Acti Mr. Schubach state Resolution of Inten amendment to allow ex certain situations. He receive and file the repo for variances, which are q the fence height maximum dif lots and explained how the de yards were made. He then defi proposed amendment and explained in'allowing higher than three fee eight lots would benefit from have over -height fences. He fences along Valley Drive stated Staff included in t ment for over -height fenc To Receive and File. ent. Staff recommended the C i ission adopt to being the process •f adopting a text eptions to the three7 eet height limit in oted the Commissigii's alternative was to t, which would result in the requirement ite expensive'' Mr. Schubach explained erences between corner lots and other ermina,pion of front, side and rear d e criteria stated within the e advantages and disadvantages ences. Mr. Schubach noted only t► ndment, stating three already scussed already -constructed no Avenue. Additionally, he a -ndment a C.U.P. require - 0 the Comms. Di Monda and Me had expected to rev nonconforming front Monda reiterated p greenbelt parkwa landscape scree Chmn. Ketz applied to was not Valley/ Staff been ent' de d e am then th of Pie suggested 1 stated their believ ew the Valley/Ardmore yard fences during this evious Commission conversations zone fencing which could increase that the Commission eenbelt area and m - ting. Comm. Di relating to the ivacy through ing. scussed her problem in approving this amenent as it my a few properties. Comm. Merl agreed the _uendment at the Commission had requested, but rather t the dmore Greenbelt area issue was to have been review:d by , with a reasonable wall height along the corridor to ve stablished. The Commission agreed Staff should review t e greenbelt section and then the Commission could make its erminations. The stated purpose of the review was to make 0 P.C.Minutes 3/17/92 B4CHGROUND MATER/AL March 10, 1992 Honorable Chairman ad Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission March 17, 1992 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 91-5 OBJECTIONABLE ODORS INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PURPOSE: TO DETERMINE THE MOST APPROPRIATE AND EFFECTIVE REGULATORY AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES FOR PREVENTING OBJECTIONABLE ODORS FROM EMANATING BEYOND THE POINT SOURCE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES Recommendation 1. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission request the City Council to authorize staff from the Planning Department, Fire Department, and Building Department to participate in the AQMD field training program. 2. Direct staff to prepare a text amendment requiring air filtration systems as noted in this report and set matter for public hearing. Background The Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 91-56 at its regular meeting on September 17, 1991, recommending the City Council direct staff to study the impact of the release of vapors and fumes from businesses and to study the possible text amendments or enforcement procedures to address this problem. The City Council approved Resolution No. 91-5500 at its regular meeting on October 22, 1991, directing staff to investigate the impact of vapors and odors released from businesses and to study possible methods to monitor and control these vapors and odors, whether through enforcement of existing laws or through amendment of existing laws. At its regular meeting of January 21, 1992, the Planning Commission directed staff to obtain and present to the Commission more information relating to the cost, impact fees, training and enforcement areas of this Special Study. Analysis Air Quality Management District Training Program for City Staff The South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD), which has repeatedly expressed enthusiasm for City participation in AQMD enforcement procedures, outlined a training program for City staff in a March 3, 1992 correspondence (see Attachment). This program would be a free -of -charge one month training session for a minimum of four City staff members. The first week of training would involve a four hour orientation ,session to familiarize City staff with existing public nuisance rules and regulations, investigation and inspection procedures, and other AQMD functions. Each City staff member will receive a set of written materials and guidelines on field inspection procedures. The remaining weeks of the training session would concentrate on actual field inspections. When the AQMD Compliance Division receives a public complaint regarding activities located in the City of Hermosa Beach, the designated City inspectors will be instructed to meet with AQMD inspectors at a "predetermined neutral site within the city limits." A pre-inspection briefing will take place at this site, followed by an inspection of the complaint site by both parties in separate vehicles. According to AQMD, the complaint investigation process will be modeled for City staff at the discretion of the AQMD inspector. Both parties will return to the neutral site after completing the inspection proceedings for debriefing and follow-up procedures. AQMD would provide a copy of their inspector's investigation report to the City "as appropriate." After completion of this training program, AQMD "will review complaint resolution activities with the City of Hermosa Beach to determine the most effective means of resolving local odor complaints in the future." According to Cher Anderson, the training officer for the AQMD Compliance Division who would be in charge of this training program, AQMD views this one-month session as an orientation exercise for City staff and a feasibility study for AQMD to determine the on-going nuisance odor problems in the City and the potential need for additional City staff training. Completion of this initial training program would not result in any AQMD certification that would allow City staff to conduct field inspections without AQMD staff assistance. The determination of possible certification would be made by AQMD after completion of the initial training program. This AQMD letter is the result of several months of on-going discussions between Planning Department staff and AQMD's Intergovernmental Affairs staff. During this time, City staff expressed interest in a potential training program outline from AQMD that could be reviewed by the City's decision-makers. Since no AQMD training program for cities existed at that time, it was necessary for AQMD to consider the specific nature of the City's nuisance odor issues and formulate an appropriate program. It has always been the intent of City staff to present a conceptual training program to the Planning Commission for a recommendation on whether to request the City Council to authorize City staff participation in an AQMD training program. The March 3, 1992 correspondence from AQMD raises some concerns from the City's perspective. In this letter, AQMD has established a March 16-April 17, 1992 training period for the City. This timeframe does not allow adequate time for the City to determine the benefits of an AQMD training program and authorize City staff participation. AQMD has informed staff in a subsequent telephone conversation that this timeframe was established merely to commit District staff to a specific scheduled program. AQMD has since agreed to work with the City in determining a future training period that would be mutually acceptable and has tentatively agreed to a mid-May to mid-June schedule. Another staff concern involves the fact that after the first week orientation meeting, this training program would be dependent upon following up on actual complaints from within the City. It has not been clearly established what the extent of field training procedures would be, if any, in the event that AQMD does not receive any local complaints during the remaining weeks. AQMD reports that it has not received any complaints of nuisance odors from within Hermosa Beach during the last three months. In a recent telephone conversation, Cher Anderson has expressed support for the possibility of having City staff participate in field inspections for sites located outside of the City that have similar nuisance odor complaints in the event that there are insufficient local complaints for inspection training. However, there has been no official AQMD confirmation of this position. Enforcement Program Cost If AQMD does eventually permit City staff to conduct independent field inspections, the City should determine the most appropriate method of charging establishments for this staff time expenditure. AQMD has informed staff that it does not charge a fee for performing field inspections, but rather charges permit fees to companies with operations that require equipment involved in either producing or controlling pollutant emissions. If the City determines that an impact fee would be assessed, a reasonable calculation for each business could be based on the total number of odor complaints and the staff time expended per complaint. It has been AQMD's experience that the field inspection process generally takes from one-half hour to two hours to interview the complaintant(s), talk with the equipment operators and/or property owner, and survey the specific site (travel time to and from the inspection site is not included in this estimate). The only odor inspections recently conducted by the City have been done by Fire Department staff for auto painting operations in conjunction with regular fire safety inspections. The City presently charges annual fees of $313.75 for spray booth inspections and $15.75 for spray booth permits. Based on an estimated 2 hour field inspection, the cost of the Planning Department code enforcement officer would be $30.80 per visit. The number of inspections per year for any given business can not be estimated immediately. Once the program is in operation, an average yearly cost could be calculated. However, if existing staff is used, the cost would be only "soft costs," i.e. employees that are already paid personnel. S Legal Factor Another important issue regarding City participation in AQMD odor control activities is that AQMD legal staff has taken the position that while City staff may conduct independent field inspections after completion of an AQMD-approved training program and AQMD certification, only AQMD staff may issue citations and initiate enforcement proceedings. City staff could make field inspections without AQMD staff assistance, but could then only report the findings to AQMD and let District staff make a decision on the appropriate enforcement actions. AQMD would be the only governmental body that could initiate enforcement proceedings even if the complaint involves violating a local regulation that is stricter than AQMD regulations. A determination from the City Attorney's office on the legal rights of the City to enforce AQMD and/or local air quality regulations is necessary. The City Attorney is currently researching this matter. Filtration Equipment New information since the previous report has been received concerning air filtration systems. Air filtration industry representatives indicate that activated carbon absorption filters are generally considered the most efficient at reducing both paint and grease odors, although the specific type of filter differs depending upon the type of emission. Activated carbon filters typically cost about thirty dollars apiece, while the entire filtration system component which ties into the fan ducting for either restaurant fan hoods or spray painting booths, including installation, costs about $2,000. Activated carbon filters typically absorb over 90% of all pollutants entering the filtration system. Staff has contacted several air filtration distributors in an effort to determine the availability of filters for auto painting and restaurant grease odors. Based on meetings with sales representatives and a review of brochures provided by various distributors, staff has identified the following companies as potential distributors for air filters that can effectively control nuisance odors: Airguard Industries, Inc. 370 Meyer Circle Corona, CA 91719 1-800-933-3458 American Filtration Systems, Inc. 451 W. Bonita Avenue Suite 20 San Dimas, CA 91773 (714) 394-4500 Barnebey & Sutcliffe Corporation 2130 Cowles Street Long Beach, CA 90813 (213) 435-2251 Maurice Carmichael and Associates P.O. Box 10188 Torrance, CA 90505 (213) 375-9848 Flame Gard, Inc. 6825 E. Washington Boulevard Commerce, CA 90040 (213) 685-4869 All of the above -listed firms can recommend standard activated carbon filtration systems that would adequately reduce at least 90% of pollutants that produce paint and grease odors. In addition, Airguard Industries, Inc. is marketing a newly developed air filter system that involves an oxidation process, commonly referred to as catalysis, to convert harmful compounds such as VOCs into harmless inert compounds (carbon dioxide, water) rather than simply reducing the concentrations of harmful compounds into the atmosphere. A system for a typical small auto painting shop, which would accommodate approximately 100-125 cubic feet of contaminated air per minute, would run about $2-3,000 for the equipment cost and about $5,000 for installation. The basic VOC abatement filters for this system (paint overspray collectors), which initially come into contact with the contaminated air at the beginning of the filtration process, would be replaced on a monthly basis rather than cleaned at a. cost of $2-3 per filter. The main component of the propietary catalytic filter section (ML 114 -HDD Ceramic Honeycomb) would need to be replaced every 2-3 years at a cost of about $2-3,000. This filtration system, however, would not be effective for heavier particulates such as restaurant grease. Based on the research, staff believes that any business_ operators subject to future nuisance odor complaints should be required to install filtration systems that can be certified by qualified representatives to remove at least 90% of the odor -producing pollutants. Respectfully submitted, Cra "Chalfsift Advanced Planner CONCUR: Michae SZhubach Planning Director Attachments: 1. AQMD letter 2. Previous staff report 3. Planning Commission minutes p/odor2 South Coast AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182 (714) 396-2000 Mr. Craig Chalfant Planning Department City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Dear Mr. Chalfant: March 3, 1992 NY -+92. Thank you for providing the Compliance Division with the opportunity to help the City of Hermosa Beach learn more about the South Coast Air Quality Management District's complaint resolution process. With the concurrence of the City of Hermosa Beach, the District's Compliance Division is prepared to implement a training program at no cost to the City of Hermosa Beach from March 16 -April 17, 1992, that will: Familiarize City of Hermosa Beach management and inspection staff with the air quality complaint resolution process, enable a minimum of four (4) City of Hermosa Beach inspectors to observe technical air quality inspection and investigation procedures, and help the City of Hermosa Beach identify needs for further technical training or other action in the future. Familiarization with complaint resolution process During the week of March 16-20, 1992, the Compliance Division will preview the complaint response process for management and inspection staff from the City of Hermosa Beach. Included in this four-hour orientation will be an introduction to the following topics: o District mission o Public nuisance rules and regulations o Investigation and inspection procedures o Documentation and follow-through o Customer service Compliance Division staff will describe its field mentor training program in detail and respond to questions about training program logistics. Inspectors from the City of Hermosa Beach will be given a set of written materials and guidelines to study in anticipation of their field mentor assignments. ( Mr. Craig Chalfant March 3, 1992 Page 2 Observation of technical procedures From March 23 -April 17, 1992, the Compliance Division will provide field mentor training to inspectors from the City of Hermosa Beach. Upon receipt: of a complaint from the Hermosa Beach area, the Compliance Division will simultaneously dispatch a District Inspector and page one or more City of Hermosa Beach Inspectors to respond to the complaint. These individuals will proceed to a predetermined neutral site within the city limits where the District Inspector will brief the City Inspector before proceeding to the complaint site. After the briefing, the City Inspector will follow the District Inspector in a separate vehicle to the complaint site. Upon arrival at the site, the City Inspector must be able to show proper city identification to accompany the District Inspector on the investigation. The District Inspector will model the complaint investigation for the City Inspector, involving the City Inspector in the investigation process at the District Inspector's discretion. When the investigation has been completed, and the inspection team has returned to a neutral site, the District Inspector will debrief the City Inspector and describe documentation and follow-up procedures. A copy of the District Inspector's investigation report may be furnished to the City Inspector as appropriate. Identification of further needs Following the four-week field mentor training period, District staff will review complaint resolution activities with the City of Hermosa Beach to determine the most effective means of resolving local odor complaints in the future. Should a need for additional technical or other training be identified at this point, the District will work with the City of Hermosa Beach to recommend or assist in the design of such training. We look forward to working with the City of Hermosa Beach on this project. Cher Anderson, training officer for the Compliance Division, will be contacting you during the week of March 9-13, 1992, to schedule a convenient date during the following week for the orientation session. In the meantime, if you have any questions or need further information, please contact Cher at 714/396-2430. Sinc,ely, Lee Lockie Director Compliance Division CSA January 14, 1992 Honorable Chairman ad Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission January 21, 1992 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 91-5 OBJECTIONABLE ODORS INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PURPOSE: TO DETERMINE THE MOST APPROPRIATE AND EFFECTIVE REGULATORY AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES FOR PREVENTING OBJECTIONABLE ODORS FROM EMANATING BEYOND THE POINT SOURCE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES Recommendation Direct staff to set matter for public hearing. Background The Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 91-56 at its regular meeting on September 17, 1991, recommending the City Council direct staff to study the impact of the release of vapors and fumes from businesses and to study the possible text amendments or enforcement procedures to address this problem. The City Council approved Resolution No. 91-5500 at its regular meeting on October 22, 1991, directing staff to investigate the impact of vapors and odors released from businesses and to study possible methods to monitor and control these vapors and odors, whether through enforcement of existing laws or through amendment of ;,existing laws. Analysis Existing State Legislation Objectionable odors fall within the group of air contaminants regulated by State law. Specifically, Health and Safety Code (H&SC) Section 41700 states that ". . . no person shall discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health, or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property." The basic regulatory mechanism for odor control is provided in H&SC Section 42300, which allows every air quality district board in the State to establish a permit system for control of potentially air polluting operations. H&SC Section 42300 specifically states ". . . that before any person builds, erects, alters, replaces, operates, or uses any article, machine, equipment, or other contrivance which may cause the issuance of air contaminants, such person [shall] obtain a permit to do so from_the air pollution control officer of the district." Violation of any State board or air district board rule or regulation is considered a misdemeanor, subject to a maximum penalty ranging from a $1,000 fine and/or six months imprisonment in a county jail to as much as a $25,000 fine and/or one year imprisonment in a county jail, depending upon the severity of the air contamination and the degree of negligence or willfulness on the part of the violator(s) per H&SC Sections 42400, 42400.1, and 42400.2. Each day during which any violation occurs is considered a separate offense. Civil penalties may be instituted for violations (H&SC Sections 42402, 42402.1, and 42402.2), but this would preclude any criminal prosecution for the same offense. Any person who intentionally or negligently violates any abatement order by the State or district board is liable for a maximum civil penalty of $25,000 for each day the violation occurs. Regulations - South Coast Air Quality Management District Odor control by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is authorized by SCAQMD "Rule 402 - Nuisance" which is essentially taken verbatim from H&SC Section 41700. A written permit from the SCAQMD Executive Officer is required for the construction ("Rule 201 - Permit to Construct") or operation ("Rule 203 - Permit to Operate") of any equipment which may cause the issuance of air contaminants. However, SCAQMD does not have an accompanying list of the specific types of equipment covered under Rules 201 and 203. Instead, Rule 219 provides a detailed list of the various types of equipment that do not need a SCAQMD permit. If a certain type of equipment is not listed under Rule 219, or if it is specifically identified as an exception to a type of equipment that is otherwise covered under 219, then a permit is required. Rule 219 specifically exempts spray coating equipment from the written permit requirement only if such equipment uses a combined total of one gallon or less per day of coating material and solvent. Commercial direct -fired charbroilers are specifically excluded from the general list of food processing and preparation equipment that do not require a SCAQMD permit. There are a total of 60 active SCAQMD permits for operations in. the City of Hermosa Beach. This total includes ten different auto repair businesses, the City Public Works Department and the Hermosa Beach School District. Auto painting shops and restaurants are two examples of commercial establishments that produce emissions subject to SCAQMD regulations. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), which are the gaseous materials containing most of the paint fume odors that emanate from small auto painting operations, are regulated under SCAQMD "Rule 1151 - Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Non -Assembly Line Coating Operations." Limitations on Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and particulate matter (PM10) from restaurant grease emissions are contained in the section entitled "Control of Emissions from Commercial Charbroiling" from Appendix IV -B of the 1989 Air Quality Management Plan. SCAQMD is currently studying the possibility of developing stricter regulations on grease emissions from restaurant operations. Enforcement Procedures - South Coast Air Quality Management District SCAQMD has a 24 hour hotline number (1-800-572-6306) for specific complaints on air polluting activities, including objectionable odors. The SCAQMD public nuisance criteria for meeting the "considerable number of persons" requirement under H&SC Section 41700 varies depending upon the severity of the circumstances.; The district previously required at least ten complaints by written affidavits before responding with a physical inspection, but this requirement has been relaxed to allow a minimum of six written complaints on a typical nuisance emission if received within a short period of time or even just a couple of complaints if it involves a known polluter that poses a serious health threat to the public. In the case of nuisance odors, the district would typically require at least six separate written complaints within the same general timeframe, usually 24 hours, before authorizing a physical inspection of the area. If the complaint involves a business that has not previously been identified as a nuisance, the district inspector would typically need to determine if the odor was produced by the operations in question by going directly to the property line. If the complaints involve an operation with a history of violations, the inspector may simply go to the general vicinity to determine if the odor is present. If the inspector makes a determination that objectionable odors are being emitted by a specific business, enforcement proceedings would be undertaken. In addition to the criminal and civil penalties permitted under State law, district staff could require periodic source testing on the premises to ensure continued compliance. If repeated violations occur, an "order for abatement" to shut -down operations could be issued from the local district attorney's office. SCAQMD only charges businesses a "sampling fee" for any sampling analysis performed as a function of enforcement procedures. Air samples are taken in one quart cans solely for the purpose of determining if the level of •air contaminants exceeds SCAQMD standards. The amount of charge varies depending upon the amount of samples taken. No fees are levied for property inspections alone. According to SCAQMD, there is inadequate staff available to perform all requested source tests on known and potential violators. SCAQMD presently can handle only about 500 source tests per year, whereas the district takes approximately 2,000 requests for source tests annually. In order to bridge this gap, SCAQMD often reviews source tests performed by outside consultants who follow either SCAQMD or federal EPA testing procedures. In November 1991, SCAQMD initiated proceedings to develop a new Complaint Resolution Section, which would be responsible for prioritizing complaints and ensuring prompt responses. The draft document outlining the powers and duties of this District section is scheduled to be ready for public review by February 1992. Enforcement Procedures - Bay Area Air Quality Management District Complaint procedures for the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), presented for comparison purposes, are essentially the same as SCAQMD procedures. The following information is taken directly from brochures provided to the public by BAAQMD. SCAQMD does not provide any written information on their enforcement procedures, since many times the exact nature of such procedures are dependent on the individual circumstances of the situation. The BAAQMD maintains a 24 hour hotline number for air pollution complaints. The BAAQMD public nuisance criteria for meeting the "considerable number of persons" requirement under H&SC Section 41700 is typically satisfied when five different individuals have made separate complaints on a single day (one household representing one complaint), with each complaint confirmed by a district inspector. A BAAQMD inspector may go directly to the suspected odor source, depending upon the circumstances, usually with the complainant. If multiple complaints are received from an area that is downwind of the suspected source, the inspector is authorized to go directly to the property line of the suspected source to determine if odor emissions are occurring. If multiple complaints are received from an area that has not had a history of odor nuisances, the inspector will usually go directly to each complainant's location and attempt to identify the odor source. An odor complaint may be confirmed if all of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) an inspector detects the odor within a reasonable distance of the complainant's address and within sixty minutes of the time of the complaint; (2) the complainant has proven to be reliable in the past; (3) the inspector confirms that the odors in the community at the time are attributable to the source named; and (4) the inspector confirms at least two other complaints in the general -vicinity on a face-to-face basis. An exception to this criteria is typically made for chronic or on-going nuisance situations. When the inspector determines that a public nuisance situation does exist, a violation notice is issued to the responsible source. An office conference is held with representatives of the responsible source to find a satisfactory resolution to the problem if more than two violations from the same odor producer occurs. If violations continue, the next step is for district staff to petition the Hearing Board (a quasi-judicial body established by State law) for an order of abatement. Abatement orders are usually conditional requirements for the addition, removal, or modification of operating equipment and changes in operating procedures within a specific timeframe. Odor Testing Procedures - Bay Area Air Quality Management District BAAQMD's Regulation 7 places general limitations on the emission of various odorous substances. The determination of odorous substances is based on specific standards of dilution rates and maximum allowable emission concentrations in parts per million (ppm). Regulation 7 specifically prohibits the discharge of any odorous substances which causes the ambient air at or beyond the property line of the source to be odorous and to remain odorous after dilution with four parts of odor -free air (defined as air which has been passed through a drying agent followed by two successive beds of activated carbon). The odor collection and testing procedures delineated in Regulation 7 apply when at least ten odor nuisance complaints are registered with the BAAQMD within a 90 day period. The Regulation 7 procedures remain in effect until such time as no citizen complaints have been received by the district for a period of one year following the initial complaint period. Regulation 7 may become applicable again if the district receives five or more odor complaints on the same source within a 90 day period. Odor sample collection involves the use of a large plastic Tedlar bag with a small pump attachment. After this bag is filled with the contaminated air, it is immediately sealed and transported to the district office. During the field collection process, three district employees are recruited to serve on an odor panel. The employees are tested prior to their selection to ensure they have what could be considered an "average" sensitivity to odor (over -sensitivity would be unfair to industry, while under -sensitivity would be unfair to the complainants). The air sample is evaluated using a dynamic olfactometer, which is a variable dilution device that accepts the air sample, dilutes it with odor -free air, and then transmits it to an inhalation mask at a flow rate of approximately 14 liters/minute (0.5 cubic feet/minute). The three odor panelists are fitted with a mask and given a total of 20 presentations, each having a 5 second duration with a 10 second pause between presentations, made up of 10 presentations of the allegedly odorous diluted sample and 10 presentations of odor -free air. The presentations of sample and odor -free air are given in random order. Each panelist presses a signal button if any odor is detected in a presentation. If at least two panelists give positive (detect odor presence) responses to 8 or more of the odor sample presentations and negative (no detection of odor) responses to 8 or more of the odor -free presentations, then the sample is deemed odorous and a violation notice is issued to the responsible source. SCAQMD previously used an odor panel to identify and rank olfactors (odors), but has since abandoned this approach due to the subjective nature of the analysis. The old SCAQMD process involved ranking odors on a one -to -five basis, with one representing minimal odor presence and five representing an -4? - overwhelming odor. The SCAQMD odor panels made this determination solely on the amount of odor in the air, with no judgment on the offensiveness of any particular odor. Existing Filtration Technology The technology for air pollution control has been a rapidly evolving field, which generally involves the following four systems. Unfortunately, all filtration systems are designed to control the emission of air contaminants and do not necessarily prevent odors. 1. Afterburner incineration systems - Afterburners (thermal or catalytic oxidation techniques) are effective in filtering gaseous materials such as VOCs. This system works well as long as the volume of air to be combusted is relatively small. High temperatures, such as 1,200 to 1,600 degrees Fahrenheit, require only a few seconds of residence time to break complex chemicals into largely odorless oxygen compounds. However, afterburners can be quite expensive. An effective afterburner system for an auto painting operation could cost over $100,000. 2. Carbon absorption systems - Carbon filtration systems can collect many of the odorous airstream molecules. The recent trend has been toward a carbon filtration system that utilizes charcoal, although charcoal filters can only absorb about 30% of its total weight in VOCs and require periodic cleaning. The estimated cost is $800 per charcoal filter and $400 for the periodic cleaning of each filter. It would cost an estimated $35,000-40,000 to convert an auto painting shop from a conventional filter system to a charcoal filter system. 3. Water or chemical scrubbing systems - This type of system breaks down odorous molecules with a chemical mist in a special scrubber towel or chamber. A water scrubbing system for controlling VOCs from auto painting activities can be installed at a cost of approximately $50,000. 4. Electrostatic precipitator - This system is effective controlling particulate matter, such as grease which contains most of the odor -producing fat released in restaurant food preparation. VOCs, being a gaseous material, are not trapped in an electrostatic precipitator system. However, there is a significant potential combusion hazard with this system, particularly when used to control cooking emissions. For this reason, electrostatic precipitators have been almost completely removed from the market. Some equipment operations do not need filtering systems if the materials used are in accordance with SCAQMD regulations. For example, only paints with low VOC content may ordinarily be used in the South Coast Air Basin, although the higher VOC paints may still be used for the primer application on base metal. Auto painting activities conducted inside an adequately constructed paint booth with paint that meets SCAQMD limits on VOC content would typically not require a filtration system. Auto painting violations are often the result of businesses illegally using paints with a. high VOC content (high VOC paints usually contain lacquers which dry much more quickly than permitted low VOC paints). Odor control is therefore often a matter of adequately enforcing existing SCAQMD regulations rather than requiring elaborate filtration systems. Options Available to the City for Odor Control Under H&SC Section 40449, cities within the SCAQMD boundaries are permitted to adopt by ordinance stricter air pollution controls than adopted by the SCAQMD, so long as the local controls are not in conflict with the district regulations. SCAQMD is required by law to enforce any valid local air pollution control ordinances. Therefore, the City of Hermosa Beach may determine that it is in the public interest to adopt more stringent rules related to the regulatory procedures for controlling odors or the enforcement of local or district regulations. Thepossible options for local controls on objectionable odors could involve any or all of the following areas: A. Regulatory procedures The City could adopt a permit system similar to the SCAQMD permit system, requiring all potentially odorous operations to obtain a permit from the City. The permit could require specific information on the type of operations, the hours of operation, the type of filtration system to be used for odor control, the procedures for operating, maintaining and repairing all filtration equipment, and any other information deemed necessary by the City to control odorous operations. The City could require the installation, operation and maintenance of specific filtration systems for specific types of potentially odorous operations. The City could require a specific model of filtration equipment by a specific manufacturer for every business that could potentially produce a specific type of odorous emission, regardless of the equipment costs. Alternatively, the City could require specific filtration equipment but set a cost ceiling for businesses based on a certain percentage of gross sales receipts in order to avoid the requirement of equipment that could be cost -prohibitive to small businesses. B. Enforcement SCAQMD could train City staff to conduct specific enforcement activities based on SCAQMD guidelines. The City could hire inspectors and source test personnel for complaint responses in accordance with SCAQMD standards. Funding for City personnel could come from a special impact fee on specified businesses that have potentially odorous operations. The City could keep an outside consultant on retainer, paid by a special impact fee on businesses with the potential for odor emissions, for regular source tests in accordance with SCAQMD standards. C. Penalties The City may impose more stringent abatement proceedings than presently applied by SCAQMD. H&SC Section 42403 does not allow cities to assess civil penalties on polluters. Conclusions The issue of whether present SCAQMD standards are adequate enough to prevent odors can often be a matter of case-by-case circumstances, involving the intensity of the source operations, prevailing meteorlogical conditions at the time of odor emissions, e.g. wind direction, wind speed, and humidity, and the availability of SCAQMD inspectors for complaint response. The offensiveness of certain odors is also a subjective issue open to individual interpretation. For example, while most people would agree that the smell of rotten eggs is more offensive than the smell of baking bread, some people may become highly offended at the smell of baking bread after continuous exposure. For this reason, SCAQMD inspectors only test for the presence of odors and don't attempt to make judgments on odor strength or offensiveness. While the City could require targeted businesses to install, operate and maintain specified filtration systems, there is no guarantee that such systems would effectively eliminate odors even if air contaminants are reduced to SCAQMD mandated: levels. SCAQMD does not certify any filtration systems but rather only places limitations on emission levels, thereby allowing businesses to select the means of compliance so long as the desired emission compliance results are achieved. As previously mentioned, filtration systems are designed to control air contaminant emissions and any reduction in odors is merely a byproduct of this process. Furthermore, some filtration systems can produce their own air pollution side-effects, e.g. afterburners run on fuels that produce hydrocarbons. If the City does decide to mandate the use of certain types of filtration systems, there are other potential pitfalls beyond the question of adequate odor control. Requiring an expensive system may be cost -prohibitive to some small businesses, while requiring only a general type of system, e.g. electrostatic precipitators for grease emissions, could provide an opening for complying with the letter of the law but not the spirit by installing cheap equipment or limiting operating times to coincide with anticipated inspections. Furthermore, requiring a specific brand-name could restrict businesses to a system that may become obsolete in a few years. The City Attorney's office stressed that while H&SC Section 40449 allows cities to adopt stricter rules and regulations than adopted by SCAQMD, such local regulations must not be in conflict with any SCAQMD standards. Potential City regulations regarding filtration systems could result in more specific and potentially more stringent procedural regulations than provided by SCAQMD..' Any local controls that could result in a procedural variation from SCAQMD standards could potentially create a conflict with district regulations. The Chief Prosecutor's Office at SCAQMD has indicated that any local procedural regulations could potentially create a conflict with SCAQMD regulations, but since the District knows of no community under its jurisdiction that has attempted such regulations it is not possible to verify this contention. Instead of instituting general procedural standards, an alternative approach suggested by the City Attorney focus on the enforcement of SCAQMD emission limitations and the adequacy of theserpollutant limits, both of which could be treated on an individual violator basis. The City could enroll staff members in the SCAQMD Violation Training Courses, which provide specialized instruction on inspection procedures for specific operations. Due to the very technical nature of these training sessions, the City may wish to limit staff training to only those emissions produced from local operations, e.g. auto painting, charbroiling. The City staff members would become certified auditors upon successful completion of training and may then be delegated certain enforcement responsibilities by SCAQMD. Alternatively, the City could keep an outside consultant on retainer to assist SCAQMD staff in performing inspections on reported violators in cases where district staff cannot expeditiously respond. The outside consultants could be funded by a special impact fee for specifically designated business operations that have the potential for emitting objectionable odors. The ordinance establishing this impact fee would need to include detailed descriptions of all business operations that would be subject to this fee. If an operation is found to be in violation of SCAQMD emission limitations, the City would then initiate the appropriate criminal or civil proceedings, as the individual circumstances dictate, either independently or in coordination with SCAQMD staff. If odor complaints continue to occur even after it has been determined that the subject emission levels are within SCAQMD limits, the City could then make a determination that stricter limitations for this particular pollutant would be in the interests of the City. The City could then adopt stricter emission limitations for that particular pollutant either on a Citywide basis or for a specifically delineated portion of the City, based on findings that due to special circumstances, e.g. close proximity to sensitive land uses, such additional restrictions are necessary in the public interest. Although the adoption of stricter emission limitations would not appear to present any conflicts with SCAQMD procedures, the SCAQMD Chief Prosecutor's Office is of the opinion that even stricter emission limits could have the potential to create a conflict with the District. However, since no community has actually adopted stricter standards, there is no evidence to support the SCAQMD position. Respectfully submitted., Craig/Chalfant AdiLanced Planner CCNCUR: _ Michael Schubach Planning Director p/odor CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Michael Schubach, Planning/ ctor SUBJECT: Enforcement of AQMD Regulations DATE: April 9, 1992 Under Health and Safety Code (H&SC) Section 40449(a), cities located within the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) service boundaries may adopt any ordinance regarding air_ pollutioncontrol which is stricter than AQMD regulations. This would enable the City to place additional requirements on odor producing establishments if it is found that existing AQMD standards are inadequate. H&SC Section 40449(a) also states that AQMD shall enforce any such local ordinances. Unfortunately, both the City Attorney's office and the AQMD legal staff have interpreted this provision in the State law as pre-empting cities from enforcing either AQMD regulations or even their own air quality regulations. This interpretation from the City Attorney's office was made on an informal basis. There is no official written legal opinion on this matter. AB 2783 (Sher) has been proposed by the State legislature to allow cities the opportunity to enforce AQMD regulations. This bill would require AQMD, upon request by the local government (city or county), to delegate to that local government the responsibility for implementing any "AQMD indirect source control measure". AQMD would be authorized to revoke this delegation of responsibility if a finding is made that the local government has "failed to adequately implement the AQMD control measure or its equivalent". Staff only received notice of this legislation recently, and does not have details; a request for this bill will be made. Recommendation Staff recommends the City officially support the passage of AB 2783 by sending letters of support from the Mayor to our local Assemblyman and State Senator, if this legislation would benefit our efforts to control odors. 1-� SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1n NOTED,: Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Attachment: AB 2783 summary p/supmemo Z AQMD'S LOCAL GOVERNMENT REPORT March 24, 1992 4 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CLEAN AIR PARTNERSHIP LOGCAP is a two-day conference that will bring locally elected government officials together at AQMD Headquarters to share ideas concerning, and gather information about, air quality programs. The conference is scheduled for May 7 and 8, commencing on May 7 with the Clean Air Awards reception anddinner, and concluding on May 8 with a full-day informational conference, which will include the recognition of cities and counties who have exceptional air quality programs. Local elected officials are being asked to reserve May 7 and 8 on their calendars for LOGCAP. ANTELOPE VALLEY BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE The Business Roundtable provided an opportunity for the AQMD to receive comments from small businesses and local governments concerning the impacts of AQMD rules and activities on them. Held on March 23 in Lancaster, the Roundtable featured L.A. County Supervisor and AQMD Board Member Mike Antonovich as keynote speaker. AQMD Executive - Officer Dr. James Lents, and Board Member Henry Morgan also participated. Community representatives noted that whatever the AQMD could do to stimulate economic development in the Antelope Valley would also help reduce commuting to more distant job sites elsewhere in the basin. In response to comments received on the distance which local businessmen must travel to the AQMD's headquarters, Dr. Lents agreed to establish an AQMD field office, on a part-time basis, in the Antelope Valley. Dr. Lents also outlined the AQMD's permit streamlining efforts, such as accounting for VOC (volatile organic compound) emissions from paints and solvents at the point of sale, rather than the point of use. The Roundtable was similar to the hearings being held by the Commission on Air Quality and the Economy. The comments of Antelope Valley participants will be placed in the record of the Commission on Air Quality and the Economy. PROPOSED LEGISLATION AFFECTS LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND ALR QUALITY AB 2783 (Sher) would require the AQMD, upon the request of a city or county, to delegate to it the responsibility for implementing any AQMD indirect source control measure. The AQMD would be authorized to revoke this delegation' of responsibility after finding that the city or county has failed to adequately implement the AQMD control measure or its equivalent. AB 908 (Farr) would mandate that cities and counties in nonattainment air basins, such as the South Coast air Basin, prepare an air quality element as part of their general plan. The circulation element of general plans would be replaced by a transportation element, in order to provide consistency with the implementation of Congestion Management Plans. The California League of Cities has indicated its support for this legislation. K1:MAREWS James Lissner 2715 El Oeste Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 376-4626 April 8, 1992 Hermosa Beach City Council City Hall Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Dust and odors agenda item, council meeting of April 14 Honorable Councilmembers: The last time I saw this item the staff was recommending that they attend an AQMD training school in order to learn how to create or enforce more stringent air filtering. This training request has become controversial in that it would be expensive in terms of staff time. While I am a proponent of more stringent standards, I have never suggested, nor do I support, sending city staff for training. Rather than trying to learn the discipline and actually measure air quality around the body shops and restaurants in town, I suggest that we continue to do as we have done so far, which has been successful. I suggest that -we mandate the type of polllution control equipment the business is to have and limit our enforcement to checking to make sure that the equipment is being used and maintained. The equipment suppliers will be happy to tell us what equipment to prescribe. I recognize that drafting even this minimal ordinance will take staff time, but this kind of protection is why all of us are willing to bear the heavy cost of government. "The ordinary administration of criminal and civil justice... is the most powerful, most universal, and most attractive source of popular obedience and attachment. It is this which, being the immediate and visible guardian of life and property... contributes more than any other circumstance to impressing upon the minds of the people affection, esteem, and reverence towards government." (Alexander Hamilton) As you turn your attention to "what else can be cut" from the budget, I ask you to use this test: If the city does not provide this service, can the citizens legally obtain it on their own? Regards, SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1H � - v -ice y� April 8, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 14, 1992 REMOVAL OF SURPLUS WASTE MATERIALS FROM BUILDING AT CLARK FIELD Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: Receive and file this report. Background: Located in the southwest corner of Clark Stadium is a small unreinforced masonry building. This building was used for a number of years by the City's Park Department for storage of fertilizers, herbicides and other chemicals related to park maintenance. The staff used these chemicals when all of the park maintenance was done by City personnel. However, the regulations have changed dramatically over the past decade and the City now contracts for spraying activities to outside contractors. Analysis: The purpose of this report is to update the City Council as to the existing status of this item. The staff has been processing the removal of the remaining materials that were left in the building. That activity has been coordinated with the Hermosa Beach Fire Department, Browning Ferris Industries, the County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services, the County Agricultural Commissioner and the Environmental Protection Agency. These agencies agree that some of the materials that were in the building need to be treated in a careful manner. The original amount of twenty-one types of materials has been reduced by the staff over the last two (2) months from approximately 2,000 pounds down to approximately 300 pounds. The remaining ten types of materials have been moved to the City yard and placed under lock and key. All of the subject materials have now been removed from Clark Field. The staff is still working with the agencies listed above to remove the remaining materials from the City. Due to the rules and guidelines of those agencies, the remaining materials may require disposal under very specified controls. The staff is waiting for additional guidance from the agencies above prior to any further action. That action may require the use of a special licensed hauler for the last of the materials. If that is the case, then the City will be required to spend the needed funds. However, if the remaining materials can be processed at no cost to the City, the staff will take that action. Respectfully submitted, 6 Lynn A. Terry Deputy City Engineer pworks/ccsrwr Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: William Grove, Director - Building and Safety SUBJECT: Block Wall at 1947 Valley Drive DATE: April 7, 1992 ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** The following comments are provided as information relative to the letter dated March 20, 1992, by Daniel and Roberta Kain. 1) A building permit was issued in error which provided for a six foot high wall in the northerly sideyard. 2) The error was detected during the first inspection (foundation) and the contractor informed of the requirements. 3) The Kains acknowledged they were made aware of the requirements, but decided to proceed with the wall prior to pursuing administrative remedy. 4) A zone variance and exception to the encroachment permit guidelines is required to allow the wall to stay in its present location. A zone variance should be heard.by the Planning Commission. Exceptions to the encroachment permit guidelines may be granted by the City Council upon appeal from the decision of the Public Works Director. 5) The City Attorney should be consulted on the request for waiver of fees to process the variance or encroachment permit. WG/rb 4.3 4 Dear Ms. K. Midstoke, Mayor of Hermosa Beach March 20, 1992 Daniel & Roberta Kain 1947 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 Per the Hermosa Beach Planning Commissions's recommendation, we are asking for your help to fairly resolve our block wall dilemma at 1947 Valley Drive. Enclosed is our initial correspondence sent to the Planning Commission summarizing the block wall construction activities at our home. A hearing was held at the March 3, 1992 Planning Commission meeting to review our correspondence. At this meeting, besides the original height issue for the north side yard block wall, a new issue of encroachment on the city right-of-way for both the north side yard and the east front yard block walls was brought forth. Due to the lack of clarity of the original survey, the Planning Commission requested a new survey be obtained by the owner to help clarify the encroachment issue. We obtained a second survey which displayed the location of the block walls relative to the property lines at 1947 Valley Drive. According to Mr. Lynn Terry, head of Public Works, the new survey shows that the both the north side yard and the east front yard block walls are encroaching on the city right-of-way. It appears that the north side yard wall only partially encroaches the city right-of-way by 0 to 5 inches while the east front yard block wall encroaches the city right-of-way by 2 feet. This information was presented to the Planning Commission at the March 17, 1992 meeting. Since the Planning Commission did not have the authority to resolve the encroachment issue, they recommended we write a letter to the city council asking for their help. As stated in the correspondence to the Planning Commission, we obtained both a permit from the city and stamped approval of our proposed block wall construction plan prior to beginning the project. The approved block wall construction plan clearly allows the height of the north wall to be 6 feet. We also obtained stamped approval for the original survey used to determine the property lines at 1947 Valley Drive. - The approved survey clearly shows the north side yard property line to be 15 feet away from the north side of the house. The approved construction plan clearly shows the north side yard wall to be located 14 feet 6 inches from the north side of the house, 6 inches inside the approved survey property line. The approved survey also shows the east front yard to be 11.5 feet from the east side of the garage. The approved construction plan shows the east front yard wall to be located 11 feet from the east side of the garage, 6 inches inside the approved survey property line. We are pleading to the city council to allow us to keep the north side yard and east front yard block walls at their present heights and locations. As stated in the correspondence to the Planning Commission, had we known that new Hermosa Beach City Ordinances only allowed 3 foot side yard walls on corner homes, then we would have kept the existing 5 foot wood fence along the north side yard. Our 2 year old daughter's bedroom window is protected by that wall's height. As for the location issues for the north side yard wall and east front yard walls, we implore the city council to honor the original approved survey and block wall construction plans and allow us to keep the walls as is. We feel if the Public Works Department suspected we were encroaching when they first drove by the project, they should have immediately issued a stop work notice and required a new survey to verify the encroachment, and then require either an encroachment permit or a new block wall construction plan to continue construction. Requiring a new survey and movement of the block walls after 3 construction has been completed is unfair. Requiring us to obtain an encroachment permit is also unfair since we would have to provide 1/2 million of liability insurance every year for the city. Finally, if a variance is required to keep the block walls, we ask the city council to grant us hardship and waive all fees necessary to process the variance. We are looking forward for your support. T. •11.x___ Daniel T. Kain wk (616-7624) hm (376-3110) Roberta M. Kain wk (364-7887) hm (376-3110) Thank you, Daniel & Roberta Kain 1947 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach Calif. 90254 Dear Christine Ketz Chairperson of the Planning Commission. We are pleading for your support to fairly resolve our present block wall dilemma. In a effort to beautify and protect our home at 1947 Valley Drive in Hermosa Beach, we decided to replace our existing dry rotted/termite infested wood fence with a beautiful stucco block wall with a nice used brick cap on top. You may have noticed the construction of the new wall while traveling down Valley Drive. Being good citizens of Hermosa Beach, we obtained both a permit from the city and the enclosed stamped approval of our proposed block wall construction plan prior to beginning the project. We proceeded to tear down our existing wood fence and obtained approval from the city inspector to pour the concrete footing for our new block wall. While in the midst of pouring the concrete footing, a new city official stopped by our home and orchestrated that our approved block wall construction was in violation of Hermosa Beach City Ordinances. Of particular annoyance to the city official was the approved 6 foot height along the north sideyard. We tried to reason with the building department to allow us to complete the construction as originally approved. Had we known prior to the beginning of construction that new Hermosa Beach City Ordinances only allowed 3 foot sideyard fences on corner homes, then we would have kept the existing 5 foot wood fence along the the north sideyard. Of particular concern to us is the safety of our 2 year old daughter, Jessica. The north sideyard fence protects Jessica's bedroom window. Since we live on the heavily trafficked Valley Drive, a 3 foot high side yard fence just does not provide adequate protection for her safety, especially during the rowdy summer months. The Building Department would not budge on their 3 foot height ordinance. They admitted that the city had made a mistake in approving our construction plan, but we were the ones that would have to suffer the consequence. Having decided that this response was both unfair and unacceptable, we went ahead and continued construction of the new wall at 5 feet, the same height as the original wood fence. This resulted in a stop work notice and enclosed letter from the Building Department, demanding we reduce the height of the north sideyard fence or suffer the legal consequences. We feel we have been both unfairly and unprofessionally treated by the Hermosa Building Department, and would greatly appreciate help from the Planning Commission to resolve this matter. We have discussed this matter with our neighbors and they agree that a 5 foot fence is mandatory for our daughters protection, and safety. Since receiving the stop work notice from the Building Department, further work on the fence has been stopped, including the installation of the gate. A speedy resolution of this matter is required to ensure our daughter's safety. We are looking forward for your support. Enclosed are copies of the approved plans, the citation, and a recent photograph of the north wood fence. Thank You Daniel Kain wk (616-7624) hm (376-3110) Roberta Kain wk (364-7887) hm (376-3110) SEC. 19.5-10 (a) H.B.M.C. . • HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION WORK -ARE LIMITED TO 8:00 A.M. THRU 7:00 P.M. -: VIOLATIONS -SUBJECT TO 01TAi iUN. FR 0- - FOR... CONSTRUCTION . . SUBMIT PLAN CHANGES 10 THE _ -...BUILDING DEPT. FOR APPROVAL ---.THIS APPROVAL .DOES NOT -WAIVE • - ANY OF THE HERMOSA BEACH BLLJG. .-PEQUIREMENTS NOT _•--SPECIFICA' V cunul�t O ! PL c PLANCHECKER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. 3,,,_3(„., - - --.._-• ---i cITY Oil: WOSA RtA_ Bui}dirtg-Department-=-- -- — --j- 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 177": I d • • • • ti 4.411:�•.a• 1I. 1 i Jam' .Ti b �.t Sr,• to N. �• ��`Z,O;�•f%''s��- 'rTrrEE7 .: . ' cYj ii i:. • •', '., .i .•. .77e.9? � dar • rP°. a7 4 • • Q%' 6, L SS. 7h, 'y •1 ! 1 41 I c r m `, •-t T j `TI > = r O m r- m- ash i • J CA 4 J I11 1 Z1' V `i`11 202 .. �c • • ;tee .5a.;,s-' Z •i1 -O.00' • Lo 7� 9 M Cr- CJ. C.F•• W V) cc al 0 ▪ • r O dz r • -1 0 <rit>mo �z zzcV) CS 0 2 �' vmi .D T --I13-4 r W*oo ZO -D=• In-1Cmrm F./ R4 /774 "Jr' 9..c. BARCLAY SURVEYING ;CO. 343 HAWTHORNE WAY HAWTHORNE, CALIFORNIA PH. OS. 5-3377 PH. OR. 8-5 LICENSED LAND SURVEYORS :. LEGAL DESCRIPTION) Q' /0.0r.42oP7 o;2 Lo 7' a/A _2..f -o r2a/a.,. Ica . Nr- tcr, ,•-tY 6''..7 Adog 6 �an.�.r._/t /2 Q f.'_/11-7,pr,-1e-er'„,•�.6 o ”' L� NAT., - GRAD E _�_ • 1S .tD AMNION 'I-- t-tr maim !{sem ;7-` 16" (tyal mess-�slfla-� ss�las�ls��� slINEWl1—an msmmslrlafslslus/ issmsommesumussimumMisIl slmasutmumsoula 1-IO,RIZON4TAL REINFORCING ALT. COURSES SEE NOTE 6 (CONCRETE t ELOCIi • 0 BAR - TOP: -BO T• -Tr). 127 f (ONSTRU4 i ICI`I NOTES . I. CONCRETE T G BE MINIMUM GRADE C.1:2.14:31-', MIX_ ALL FOOTINGS T'0':BE IN UNDISTURBED EARTH; 3. GROUT MIX I:Z-3 CEMENT- TO PEAGRAVEI_ TO SAND. . DY. • 4, PART LIME_ 4. P,IASONRY UNITS SHALL BE GRADE A CONFORMING -TO A.S.T.M. C90-•5? SPECS..• a MORTAR MIX. I =3tip CEMENT TO SAND TO LIME. PUTTY. 6. HORIZONTAL REINFORCING TO BE 3" WIDE TRUSS TYPE, STA_NDARD WEIGHT WITI-L DEFORMED BATS, • 7. VERTICAL PILASTER REiNFORGING AND FOOTING REINFORCING TO CONFORM TO A.S. T.M. A-15 AND P.-305. • • ELEVATION CRIT`F!C. .� . NAT. GRADE n Y t DEEP CAISSON (jyp.) 6":-.8"x16" • CONC. BLOCK •SOLID GROUT sI 2 4 BARS VERTICAL, LAP 20" MIN. 4 BAR • TOP' BOTTOM IND LOAD = 15 P.s.f. SOIL DESIGN BEARING .VALUE= 1000 • DEEP- CAISSal NAT.: GRA 0 •2 4 SECTION CITY • OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING LDI. I'UN,:_ 1/14/92 DATE .i - • •r' 4"/ ' BLDG. PERMIT NO JOB ADDRESS a°. -?gush ,-.: s.: r,' , ._�,;' ):* "' ':1947 Va13ey.;Drige,,Hezmasa Beach, California ,90254rt _ LEGAL.' DESCR .•-.. " LOT NO = r > BLOCK _ ?1 TRACT .. OWNER. PHONE ' Dan -Bobbi - Kain - -'-1947 Valley Drive, H. B. , CA - 376-3110 CONTRACTOR ,'• : , MAIL ADDRESS :: ZIP + :"0 -. PHONE - CITY LIC. NO. . ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER 3.' Y ..__t:.. MAIL ADDRESS i' PHONE - LICENSE NO. •♦... .-'• - it "n tit ... . .. � ♦ - - - •� -.._ ' r' t -j i_. / ENGINEER t x -'•. MAIL ADDRESS mow_.- ..-PHONE--,....•-•-•— - •LICENSE Na ` - • CLASS OF WORK ,:'' ..; ..-- ,:; ❑ ADDITION .❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ DEMOLITION la NEW • DESCRIBE WORK: '. ..Block WWa11 (non retaining) 6' to 3' high USE OF EXISTING BUILDING Ihereby affirm oI Division License Gass • Date LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION ' that IamlcensedunderprovisionsdChapter9(commencingwithSection7000 3 d the Business and Professions Code) and my homes is in full force and effect - License Number ' 81kii. _ USE OF PROPOSED BUILDING: • = • Skit • • Contractor . .. M VALUATION OF WORK: $ 8200.00 __. ADDRESS crry AND 1 hereby affirm welch this LENDERS - :' I hereb/, affirm •OLas owner work. and ❑ 1, as ower construct OI asn exempt _ ZIP PHONE SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ' CONSTRUCTION that there is a construction permit is issued (Sec. 3097. Civ. ADDRESS LENDING AGENCY lending agency for the performance of the work for. C) LENDERS NAME - _ - - " - APPLICATION :1 PLANS CHECKED BY 1 APPROVED FOR ACCEPTED •BY -. I .I ISSUANCE BY " • RB _: _ 1 1 P� ';.. lu_7 - .'•r'' .. .': • - •OWNER-BUILOERDECLARATION •- `: that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: dthe property,or my employeeswith wagesastheirsdecompensation.willdothe the structure is not intended or dfered for sale. -- of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to ' the project. (. under Sec B&PC for this reason PLAN CHECK FEE 7it� 1 PERMIT FEE i%.,�-�. 1 STATE SEISMIC • . . y�126 OQ• I $193.50 : • 1 .. $. 8n • ' . I .:..• • •: •1 I C7c.. . SEWER USE FEE ' N/A .. PARK 6 RECREATIONIQUIMBY FEE N/A • •. ' 7t; • .• �• nate.OWNER:. • •-"--•---`' f � I hereby alfinn Compensation .COMPANY Certified OCertified'copy Dale WORKERS' COMPENSATION that I have a certificate d Insurance. cra certified copy DECLARATION consent to sett -insure, or a certificate d Workers' thereof. POLICY NO. FIRE HYDRANT FEE Y; N/A -. . .. DEMOLITION CREDIT: TYPE 11� SQUARE FOOTAGE. • N r /O copy is hereby furnished is filed with Building Dept , .:. . DATE EXPIRES: ' LIVING AREA . •. (SQ.. FT.-) ;= s h • +♦.. GARAGE AREA.y (SQ. FT • ) ♦ TOTAL 'AREA -. (SQ." FT.) ::VERIFIED •. • APPLICANT ._ . - ..: .:.... .. .. '., -. -CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE '_t . , ' (This sect • ion need not be completed 1f permit Is for S100 or less) ' . ,- .' -Icertfy that in the -performance of the work for which this permit is issued. l shall not employ any person in anymannersoastobecomesubjecitotheWorkers'CompensationLawsofCatlomla. Dale: APPLICANT: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION •Y -;,•• N/A - ,,OCCUPANCY •CROUP .• 'i -N/A LOT SIZE , T A '-,.1s/A' •- USE ZONE • - - 1 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES REQUIRED N/A t l i YES El NO NOTICE TO APPLICANT: If. after making subject to the Workers' Compensstion provisions with such provisions or this permit shat be t CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE REAL) THIS APPLICATION TION IS CORRECT. 1 AGREE TO COMPLY LAWS RELATING TO BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. •TATNES OF THIS CITY TO ENTER UPON INSPECTION PURPOSES. ` / / - .tomt- = :••--' •I 'L-••' this Certificate of ExemptaR you should become of the Labor Code, you must forthwith com ofy deemed revoked NO. DWELLING UNITS 1 OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: 1 1 . I .. _ _ 1r - -- 1 COVERED 1 UNCOVERED - AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE INFORMA- WITH ALL COUNTY ORDINANCES AND STATE AND HEREBY AUTHORIZE REPRESEN- THE ABOVE MENTIONED PROPERTY FOR /. �•• . APPROVALS 1 REQUIRED - - I NOT REQUIRED I COMPLETED ZONING 1 1 I- HEALTH DEPT. 1 1 1 FIRE DEPT. 1 . 1 1 - SignatureolApplcantorAgent Date - • SOILS REPORT 1 1 1 PUBLIC WORKS 1 1 - 1 SCHOOL FEES -1 1 1 ,Pont Applicants/Agents Name 9 OFFICIAL RECEIPT ACCT r -;240 l CASH • 8S 31813 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CK zs3� RECEIVED FROM CALIFORNIA � " ,� )Art4 i Vit, KM4-1 7Z ?, THE SUM Or` 7-� IgUND 4 1.1' 44I �C-L4 7DOLLARS S � 1p '1 . r 1 7Y - .SO a. c • z>z- 4 -�01C w' ( I cN 7 -`/ALL U 'br{ . DATE -1y- OFFICIAL RECEIPT VALIDATION ACCT 178 13 CASH 91 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHCK 2733 31812 CALIFORNIA RECEIVED FROM FOR DAMIEt- KAIM .44•-f �lz4iCj� 19 47 VALL_e.j DATE I VALIDATION CLAIM PHOTOGRAPH RECORD Claim No. "/._ r'cr) / RR Insured PHOTO* TAKEN DATE Negative available? Yes No DESCRIPTION re4.e._(3... r PHOTO Negative DESCRIPTION COMMENTS: SUI3M1 i JU) NAM E ' SNI5.111'3 HI.V1S DATE Mig t-17.4/ 9I:ZI UsTZ/Z0 --z� /4").`",-ity HERMOSA BEACH LITTLE LEAGUE 710 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 March 26, 1992 Mayor Midstokke and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear City Council: As President of the Hermosa Beach Little League, I am writing this letter on behalf of the parents and children who participate in this worthwhile youth sports activity. The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a major parking problem that has been created with the closure of the parking lot across from City Hall on the greenbelt. It was our understand that this item was on the City Council agenda of March 24, 1992, for the purpose of "review of revised conceptual designs for the greenbelt parking lot, CIP 91-511." as stated on the published agenda for that meeting. At no time was it made known to the residents who will be adversely affected by this action that closing the parking lot was one of the options included in the "conceptual designs". We were under the assumption that the existing parking lot was going to be landscaped and made attractive. Certainly, from the description on the city council agenda, one would not get the feeling that closing the parking lot was even an option. During the little league baseball season, parking for Clark Stadium and the adjoining facilities is at a premium. At any given time there are twelve teams playing and warming up for games --at 10 kids per team that means 120 kids at a time --and most of these kids are accompanied by parents who arrive in a vehicle and need a place to park. These people are forced to compete for parking with basketball players and aerobic exercisers --other worthwhile activities that take place at Clark Field --(not to mention if there is a special function at the Clark Building such as a wedding reception). Even with the parking on the greenbelt open and available, there is still somewhat of a parking problem and many people end up parking in the adjoining residential neighborhoods. But with the parking lot closed, there will be a major impact on the adjoining residential neighborhoods. irb We respectfully request that this item be placed on an upcoming agenda for reconsideration, in order that the residents who use the park and the adjoining residential neighbors can have a chance to give input prior to any redesigning of this area for permanent closure. Thank you very much. Sin -rely, Al / tanni ) President Hermosa Beach Little League HERMOSA BEACH FRIENDS of the LIBRARY :arch 28, 1992 City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ::embers of the City Council: ja: MAR311992 - `LT CRY Cbrll City at ►Lrmo.e Beeth , A government is the only vessel that leaks from the top: A current example of this is the action of the City Council at its .-arch 24, 1992 meeting which closed the public parking area on the greenbelt opposite the Hermosa Eeach City Hall and Library complex. Lack in the mid 1960's when the Present City Hall and Library were constructed, the dedicated parking area was quite adequate for the respective staffs and for the patrons and visitors. Today, with the staffs doubled or more than doubled in size, space for parking in the vicinity is at a Premium. From the civic center growth evolved. the actively used, informal, now banned greenbelt narking area...normally a dustbovl in the summer and a mudhole in the winter. During the normal work week, library patrons, less -privileged city staffers, and others have resorted to parking in this city -designated "Public Parking" area. With this parking loss, the Vons lower level parking area -off Ardmore has been suggested as a substitute. Public safety becomes a signifi- cant factor when pedestrians are required to navigate the multiple crosswalks through the Pier -Valley -Ardmore intersections. For our Library's older patrons, this alternate parking area is obviously not acceptable. It appears inconsistent with the City's Zoning Ordinance to eliminate public parking on the multi -use greenbelt without providing a real alternative, when stringent parking requirements are continually imposed on business and residential property owners. Certainly this greenbelt parking could be improved to include paved surface, designated parking spaces, lighting at night, and attractive landscaping, to be compatible both with the overall scheme of the lc 550 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California 90254 213/379-8475 HERMOSA BEACH FRIENDS of the LIBRARY City Council - =age 2 greenbelt parkway and the Coastal Commission requirements. Such improved parking would be welcomed by the patrons of Hermosa's Civic Theater, Clark Stadium attendees, summer beachgoers, and visitors to the ever popular Fiesta de Artes. Please, Council Members, reconsider your decision to close this badly needed public parking area. Restore it, instead, as a civic asset. Since the Library was not previously informed of this council action, please do the following: (1) Place this letter on your agenda and (2) Schedule an advertised public hearing on this matter at the next available City Council meeting. Si erely, ohn T. Hales, President Friends of the Library JTH : bd 550 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California 90254 213/379-8475 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY TREASURER RE: REMOVAL OF PARKING FROM THE SANTA FE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY IN FRONT OF CITY HALL DATE: MARCH 30, 1992 My personal belief in 1983, was that parking should not be allowed on the Railroad right of way. However, during Council discussion regarding the Coastal Commission parking requirements and the City's preferential parking plan, the Coastal Commission was told that a total of 400 general public parking spaces were to be provided at six different satellite parking locations. Council majorities have established the Right of Way as one of the six satellite parking locations. This parking plan is a part of our State mandated Coastal Plan. The State approved Coastal Plan gives the City permit authority. My concern's are as follows: 1. The City has allowed parking on the Right of Way for almost a decade. Where is the City going to provide parking for these displaced vehicles. 2. Has the recent Council action placed the City's preferential parking plan in jeopardy. 3. Will this Council action give the Coastal Commission reason to reject the City's Coastal plan. 4. Ancillary to this Right of Way parking issue is the topic of parking at the Von's shopping center. In 1983 the Council, in resolution 83-4044, established Pacific Coast Highway and Pier in the Hermosa Beach parking authority, allowing general parking behind Marie Callenders restaurant and under the Von's parking lot. This parking is to exist until the the original agreement is changed which has never occurred. 4� d .§ In conclusion, I think the Council acted to remove the parking from the Right of Way based on a deficit of pertinent information. Perhaps an advertised public hearing on this matter would allow the Council an opportunity to explain the wisdom of their decision. Gary Bruts h City Treasurer o : CA-6)CotkpNcll_ 61-0(kra.._ -yftur akeiS Lam_ t(y re.v1A4u•e_ lo..a\rur g-te,r6-tatt, tv.\.-froykt 0 9 IktpriV f 1%L Tr\this co-wm.u.A. acork._ S4iu Co tkr-t_5 CAAce bo-S(o.60a takkr:ts. Socctr ciavk baseboat tmAlck&t tivic o -R_ tktt.e_q..ovas OtLS CvAirt- c(e_clsk.cr. 6-Q_Yve&C-E, %Gdr caoNA.?, tiAA rks` bacq\ , buct- 1 claavkat uNtzt,d. S --or ireyvvve___ sio,cizs -9-o-vvv 0.cctss. _ Ds1:0-(k_s 0S- tftt's Ki:not sRattu 6.e_ 6.e. ore. cuC-Lk-Corm.e.oLoitte_nr JR ccul_ o -Y\ .1-t0 Lau. v--tituL so-th thtre. tis r cicEyt 0,601.kt' Lo -C\-0., til- 6-e- ch tu-S54eck tkr\C Qa re-cavvS0(e)r, 5eq-k4S kr-n Strevdecir VAR__ tiyA Lot_ RaoL regarvt- tkizi-k&ktkrocs-M:) cx.t. Ikv-kAA,050:VOilt SciAbot!j.?. _ 9-zsN42.2t. Goa- Tvz._ 14e rw.,6 s dex. CZ Z e,11,4105c. e0,3\ ( 0 IN (y —21 man ` re 6 rte u5Q : 'os 0__ p cct-,\\ (), c"0 e_ �� '� PRA .41, seace,� \19,3\ I 5.,ccgr, .cehis , AVI prod w \A VA,05a 3eQcs.h Thec` . �� b�l,�`Q„, rqr fr2I,11 .Sidi d temt 1'01 311, :5tC\agm, 4 1113 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 April 4, 1992 The Honorable Robert Essertier, Mayor and City Council Members Hermosa Beach City Council 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mayor and Honorable Council Members: RECEIVED APR 0 7 1992 CITY MGR. OFFICE I am 11 years old, a student at Hermosa Valley School, a player in the Hermosa Beach Little League and our family is one of the sponsors of my team, the "Twins". My Father and I decided to check the parking situation at Clark Stadium for you today. We first checked at 9AM and found lots of parking everywhere, except on the greenbelt and in the Clark Stadium parking lot. Since there were so many spaces available, we decided not to bother to count the available parking spaces again until around 11AM. At 11AM, I counted the following: - Greenbelt (in front of Clark): - Clark Stadium (by GSA Bldg): 3 - Clark Building lot: 0 spaces - Ardmore (between Pier and 8th): - City Hall lot: 24 spaces - Mini -storage lot: 24 spaces - Under Von's lot: 135 spaces - Community Center: 47 spaces - Alano parking lot: 10 spaces 0 spaces spaces 28 spaces The total number of public parking spaces we saw which were available and close to Clark Stadium at 11AM was 271 spaces. I hope this report is of help to you. Sincerely, Shea H. McCurdy RECEIVED urs 0 8 1992 CITY MGR. OFFICE April 7, 1992 City Council of Hermosa Beach Madame and Gentlemen: I think you were not fully aware of the vital importance of the green strip area at Pier Ave. and Valley as a public use. This area was never intended to be used exclusively as a park. The public depends on it for parking space too. Even temporarily closing this area from parking accommodation is a disservice to the users of the library, city hall and recreation areas. Closing it off permanently would be a foolish flouting of public opinion. I think you may by now be aware that this prohibition is not popular. Please reconsider this hasty, unheralded, unwelcome change. Re -open the green strip to parking. - Cordially Myron and Patricia A. Gazin 31iPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION A9li \\ , \C\ct - �Q�tiYri SG PJy-v-C� RECEIVED APR 1 3 1992 CITY MGR. OFFICE a 3 .�- 1NNia. \.rc‘ UZ.L.C.AN Nat\ cm -A Vis: Q.3.).,. r Y.c) OfNv S. t. Com. Vraz \C,o.�) a. c\i.aet.u' LT n, . cr-r, e� Vu.).e)1.)&c_\‘\i3,(\, k y S 0 z.. ' 4&o,v4 acv C\SL.G \ ma(`)' .S--A'O`7A A ut,w-\ Qi.p3Q,cry\,-z) o. ez%.).-k-K5A . \-\�ti^rYvG S C� s\s\.S. \Q,5N-r"Q& \(\zi.s .)-sasr um a.sYwJ &duJQi-N\ C - Cxv w 59 . \ Ct -rh (� QJ1S S G `J Coln . y 1Y- 9.2 PETITION TO RE—OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NAME & SIGNATURE THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. ADDRESS /0176 !O'N S�5Ci N•3. /d/ 7 C ytwevs f3, Are //=6 sly 23 1.1a0.— 4t113 c) 747‘a tOe l f/r� 45D- 3-28-92 PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USER_ OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL D:CI_C[QN TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER Ti) ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NAME & SIGNA two 31-11—P FOR YODUR� TNK YOU TENTION. �, ADDRESS € SLk 420 _ _Z QNB i. #365 . ? 1.23 ye zieze 17 $2 ,Jatle Pgr vC,_ }4 •CP Lef"- ,�z /� .,C_', Et:wZ.(8(41.6_11{:±64 90 77z- 5.7 g Q i __?. ._..2 i%- ..:9°z:74 a,,Q 1 2o3 Pr19sPcc- "`��_,t .a 1 0s/174 S f3 a y 57 fig 706151y 3-28-92 /-(4 PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM I.N ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. N & SIG ATTURE .4#'0011/ 0, toy, Q-0 • tiCk-c-Ft) K YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. ADDRESSto/h J/moo F,t;,,a CP, ?le _%2L _.1.9771 7 I--- 2-± _ -• t24.( $j° 90/ L /7,-2 xeuie .71--67/-zo,�}.J/. g 2,<) 2 O P /L3 _ k(.0(6_ uiv-2,1,46 Ovvitx,tc¥ owl, 36 /1%1- 97,E /0-e PA i Ci(c52_4 Rc6 3-28-92 PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPEP NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM TN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. ADDRESS 1--05-. j S f 5T%2j _.� /-4"1s7I ^.,ra-44- dvt- 53 3- Z,1*St.- 14- - r23z--3''-=s d 23 \\ee. \Pc . .E)0 ‘oki Sk- AD -1,1 /.Z73 7;I 9:/. 4i 2, THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. 269/7 o `.. /4- z 42 / 2 N%r / /?`i-1 r3 C6 (Q ` ifZO-7* V, __7L n! /�-6. eta// 3-28-92 PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NSIGNATURE tai TV �M ✓i!" G )G2',�_ =�/ / THANK YOU FOR Y UR ATTENTION. ADDRESS a 3151 -31+f -h3 a3'2u� - //5 Jv�y'7 2�,(Q ,owe- 5771.,(' 1� /637 //TA °�e ff-c 570 3 //7-J` 52)61 econd. '. 14.1 5-561 Sec ori pl.. 3b / 3V ( COf O4).0.- s ± /� .i, • /Zs) i z :4 /6,32 /` u 3-28-92 PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE CRRENBEIT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTEL) WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. Wt REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NAME # SIGNATyRE IgA i AMP -gwelle0116- VW' 15 q‘k 444 • THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. ADDRESS 1 enif Lapf/L-Dia2,e_. 25g.1.0.__th /I&, "ZeiZA-..:7._ dAle..,1/1-5 r 5e13 2-Y 3-2a-92 PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKINC LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPt.x NOTICE 3N ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DEpISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NAM & SIGNA E ADDRESS Jar- afila t2. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. 4,64/411 .eirt AA 3 1&aIs-tot„ 6.d �3Z 3 • , .i . ordz77 dic2q0077E/ 41-3 /Ls h()' /7th- . cd i- 9006 n :L(1 _.J a1 " PL.222. 14.1 cioz77 -', -{-Lerioya Pte, goas` f _gel 57%37- e 90z5Z( Na411-224-vc. Aid" /72,3 ufvtyfiw-__.li:.S goz3-4 3-28-92 PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THF LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THF CLOSURE. WE REQUEST Tut: COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISJ.ON, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NA SIGN TURF / (123,41,Y/LbLat. 1 � r THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. ADDRESS,1 z_/_ �= 47703> _%./a( -L1_7 Cys -615 51- 1 /r LZ./7 c� Ll P.a e e-si //. /3 .257.2 3-28-92 PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. �1 & SIGN17%5 1) /e6 Oaralffm YUR ATTENTION. ADD ESS - ---Z---C=am" PP Q C %),O 0.)c No ffU. (.36xq- 19TH _.c.31' iloco cfivjlem ge- _log3 el 04(ei-1,63, ii.er -510 V2 aHVol 1 Ns_ LILT _51) vTh v frc.v X8.13, 6c L PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL, SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NAME & SIGNATURE //,,,�,,, / / / �/ GDRESS 20»'5)- 111 MAL u11614‘12a. :33 plh 7 T/ ,. ,2 acct: _L/L`'( cl � ..411..e47_c�. 7 tr-4 4. • 6/c 600(i lefir /s2 C t /7G'Q �7 e,37 -,'2 0 7 *O. Z i'% 1- `6 it' L--' a5' rL r '1 -al rig 6c-pic Am_L_W%SL T NK YO FO' YOUR ATTENTION. 8744_ is,1-6 PETITION TO RE—OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. 7.10E & SIG[NATURE NOM a.7t'/eL" r //4� a& (2-gj THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION, ADDRESS 41f Cr 1/13. (9 OZ 01050 cdt /'/ 8 7>l't S-7-; %7G>.rlold— GG�'�`moi �--7 5'8'fs--- zo'-CSi- 56 Y r` Sr '-to \O 9 - \©` `s1- t -t 3 _11 Z7 E.4..co 02.3 `Oatct IPPL At14 ::'/J,,,,ave T 7o 3 fv 1/444 me e 7 St PQv 4,CJ- (Lilo Isi Pi,./e6.1c /‘ .46 a2v 4' 1 izia A .5 3-28-92 PETITION TO RE—OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE r,RFFnIRELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITFM TN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. 2/4444 \Ida cimzcz THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. AD96bS, J _ ciLo,, C4/- 9073 t-7‘ Il.atA\-CiA J,v1 p6 ot a -79 gl r49L° C.; /5-i 6, d4/14P4A , Si' %4,a4oar1- 7o sLf 1a9 /4,77/ sT f/itcosq .. 162_r7 .R a..5y J6713)0 0.075--- 1 r,v� -Zac 4-N 5))q-) 1�aL �'i-i- /fie1 Q. 90as77/ z z enc � .s e .K „c �-.. (v�Il� P4 / ots-52— —tet / Z33 HARP,?/1V // i v A I3fACK, 4 9oz5y" movie 3-28-92 PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCTT, DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NAM & SIGNAT E _�i_►,'_ LLQ-_ Maws 13 (1 L THAP!K YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. ADDRESS ,/ ..g„ (...gcL P 940 t.4k-T' L!46______ yaw /216..a&e4021_ ae..o.J. a f(c _Dr. -'-4 aq1 ida 52Q 2oLc o-" t*i— (H4t S+. f3 ssI 0'00. . 148, 3-28-92 PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THF LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPF.2 NOTICE IN ORDER 7'O ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN 01T R TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. ADDRESS 91/g IS5 f►,/Q,r-y r ►, _ . . 1�c01—�� -sr.� H.E.•.__� THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. 3-28--;2 PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL TH%T THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. ADDRESS 020.5= & THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. 3-28-92 • April 7, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 14, 1992 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 91-3 LOCATION: 598 FIRST STREET APPLICANT: HARRY PECORELLI 598 FIRST STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: ZONE CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation The Planning Commission and Staff recommend that the City Council approve the requested zone change by adopting the attached ordinance. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of March 3, 1992, voted 3:0 to recommend approval of the requested zone change in accordance with the recommendation of staff. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report for further background. Analysis Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report for the analysis of this request. C(�hjCUR : Michael Schizbach" Plan i g Diretr Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Attachments Respgctfullx Sybmi ed: Z. - /Ken Robrtson Associate Planner 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. P.C. Resolution 3. P.C. Staff Report/Minutes 3/3/92 4. Maps 5. Photographs 6. Application 7. Public Notice Affidavit - 1 - p/pcsr598 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE 92 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP FROM OPEN SPACE TO R-2, TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, FOR THE PARCEL AT 598 FIRST STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the requested zone change on March 3, 1992, and made the following Findings: A. The subject parcel is appropriate for residential use as it is surrounded by residentially uses and residentially zoned property; B. Changing_the zoning to R-2 will make the property consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential and will result in a potential density on the lot of 19 units per acre which is in the middle of the range identified for Medium Density of 14-25 units per acre; C. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the Staff Environmental Review Committee and the proposed zone change has been determined to qualify for a Negative Declaration; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the zoning map be amended as described as follows and as shown on the attached map, and adopts an environmental negative declaration: SECTION 1. Zone change from OS (Open Space), to R-2 (Two -Family Residential), the parcel at 598 First Street, and legally described as a portion of lot 42, Block 78, Second Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. ►Y 1 �2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1992, by following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: p/pers598 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 3 General Plan Map HIGHWAY • ( Zoning Map HIGHWAY 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P.C. RESOLUTION 92-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FROM OS, OPEN SPACE TO R-2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FOR THE PARCEL AT 598 FIRST STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed zone change on March 3, 1992, and made the following Findings: A. The subject parcel is appropriate for residential use as it is surrounded by residentially uses and residentially zoned property; B. Changing the zoning to R-2 will make the property consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential and will result in a potential density on the lot of 19 units per acre which is in the middle of the range identified for Medium Density of 14-25 units per acre; C. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the Staff Environmental Review Committee and the proposed zone change has been determined to qualify for a Negative Declaration; NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby recommend amendment of the zoning map as described as follows, and adoption of an environmental negative declaration: 1. Zone change from OS, Open Space, to R-2 Two -Family Residential the parcel at 598 First Street, and legally described as a portion of lot 42, Block 78, Second Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Di Monda,Merl,Vice Chmn.Marks NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm.Suard,Chmn.Ketz 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 to 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 92-12 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, Cali ornia at their regular meeting of March 3, 1992. /! Robert B. Marks, Vice Chairman /cl Date p/pers64 Michael S ubach, Secretary Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 91-3 LOCATION: 598 FIRST STREET February 25, 1992 Regular Meeting of March 3, 1992 APPLICANT: HARRY PECORELLI 598 FIRST STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: ZONE CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Commission recommend approval of the request by adopting the attached resolution. Background Project Information: Lot Size: 6,840 sq. ft. Current Use: Furniture Manufacturing and Storage Current General Plan Designation: ND Residential Current Zoning: Open Space The manufacturing use of the property is legally nonconforming based on the prior designation of this property as manufacturing due to its location on a railroad spur. The Staff Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of January 9, 1992, recommended adoption of an environmental negative declaration, given that the General Plan designation is Medium Density residential for this lot and that established surrounding uses and zoning is consistent with R-2 zoning. The applicants desire to convert the existing manufacturing building to residential was also discussed and the applicant was informed that although the nonconforming manufacturing use could continue under R-2 zoning, conversion to residential would require bringing the building up to current residential development standards. 8 Analysis A review of old zoning maps and building department records show that the subject lot was zoned M-1 from 1930 to 1956, while on the 1978 map it was unclassified like all other parts of the railroad right-of-way. In 1984 it was designated open space along with other unclassified railroad right-of-ways whether owned by the railroad or privately owned. Although this made sense for the portion of the right-of-way which is now the greenbelt, there does not appear to be any reason, historical or otherwise, for this spur to be designated open space. The adjacent condominium project to the west was approved for a zone change in 1987 from M-1 to SPA. Although a zone change to R-2 was requested, because of the large size of the parcel a lower intensity residential SPA classification consistent with the middle of the Medium Density range of 14-25 units per acre was granted allowing only 10 units (18 du/acre). The property across First Place was also rezoned at that time from M-1 and OS to SPA for 11 units (18 du/acre). The properties to the east are all zoned R-2. The subject property, if rezoned to R-2, would yield a maximum of three units, or a density of 19 units per acre. This would be consistent with surrounding densities and uses and make the property consistent with the General Plan. Respectfully Submitted: A C0NG-U : _ % /� Ken Robertson Associate Planner A— , Michael Schubach Planning Director Attachments 1. Maps 2. Photographs 3. Proposed Resolution 4. Staff Review Minutes 5. Application 6. Public Notice Affidavit p/pcsr598 G eg Snyder, 1902 Spirer Laneresponded to Vice-Chmn. Mars que 'ons by explaining his building plans, including the sta±rw.kay, decks anddxetaining wall. -:-- Public Hearing closed by Vice -Churn. Marks at 7:30 p m. MOTION by Vice-Chmn. Mark sT seconded by -Comm. Merl, to APPROVE 91-10/NR 91-9 with conditions. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: It Comms. Di Monda, Merl and-Vice-Chmn. Marks None None -- -Comm. Suard and Chmn. Ketz noted this issue may be appealed before the City Cou`n PDP ZON 91-3 -- ZONE CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) TO BRING INTO CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE PLANNING - COMMISSION, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 598 FIRST STREET. Recommended Action: To recommend approval of said zone change and adoption of the Environmental Negative Declaration. Mr. Schubach stated Staff recommended approval, noted the lot was previously zoned M-1, unclassified and designated open space in 1984, along with other unclassified railroad right-of-ways. He stated there did not appear to be any reason this spur should be designated as open space and explained zoning of adjacent properties. Mr. Schubach stated if the property were rezoned to R-2, a maximum of three units would be consistent with surrounding densities and uses, making the property consistent with the General Plan. Commissioner Di Monda determined with Mr. Schubach that the zoning was a oversight effecting the privately -owned property. Public Hearing opened by Vice-Chmn Marks at 7:33 p.m.,.,.. Harry Pecorelli, 752 22nd Street, San Pedro, explained the property's history, stated that he was not a developer and simply wished to occupy his own property. Public Hearing closed by Vice-Chmn. Marks at 7:34 p.m. MOTION by Vice-Chmn. Marks, seconded by Comm. Merl, to APPROVE ZON 91-3. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Comms. Di Monda, Merl and Vice-Chmn. Marks None None Comm. Suard and Chmn. Ketz Vice-Chmn. stated this issue may be appealed before the City Council. It was noted this issue may be appealed before the City Council. .- /0 - P.C.Minutes 3/3/92 BACKGROUND MATER/A[ ��ntt 2u n 1 kS 4uh►t5 Auhvks 4unlis 2ur►4S 2unt}S Iuhf+ Existing Uses 0 z 00.0 cc w x/ r/ ES r -12- ,PROJECT ADDRESS CITY OF HERMOSACBEACH 5 Project Name (If applicable) LEGAL DESCRIPTION Pure_nciti GF (,; z (3C:c- `7 ,1; 2,vv �a. 1 Z ZONING .Sf} 16chi. APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name (s) /7A�f�.� r- <' d CrC Mailing Address /j^.Z S Applicant's Relationship to, -Property APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE (/-i( f DATE /2--?,u-C1/ Phone i PROJECT REQUEST _ Conditional Use Permit Amendment (3805) Conditional Use Permit-Commercial(3812) Conditional Use Permit -Condo (3812) Number of Units Environmental Staff Review (3803) Final Map (3810) General Plan Amendment Specific Plan (Amendment) Lone Change (3811) Lot Line Adjustment (3884) Nonconforming Remodel (3866) L! 300' Radius Noticing (3868) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - RECEIVED BY: Parking Plan (3857) Permitted Use Request (3885) Planning Commission Appeals(3888) Precise Development Plan (3867) Tentative Map for Subdivision / Lot Split (3809) Tentative/Final Map Extension (3883) Text Amendment, Private (3886) Variance (3808) Voluntary Lot Merger (3887) Total Fees"/ PP -3.C° DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A o fi(L t_iv(c x) ;—a DATE OF SUBMITTAL: jZJ(g/q) • r c-.fq c_i= - r = ► - 6 r_n-M i L_'- t?C Co NSSt5 1-14Ly w IT) -1 & WC1"LAc_ V-AlJ (attach additional pages if necessary) OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT* We/I �CQ, ' ibeing duly sworn, depose and say that we/I are/.m the o ner of the property involved in this application and t at the foregoing st4tements and -answers herein contained and the;-iiiformation/1erewith submitted are true and correct to the best of our my knowledge andbIief. Subscribed and sworn before me this `-day of 4 J.,e C:2/?C aa , 199/ . NOT' • RY PUB-L'LG in and for the County of Los Angeles, State of California — *Signature required from current PROPERTY OWNER. not owner in escrow. igp'ature Addr,4'ss 7 s- /0 76 ,4 r°73 '4;/0i Telephone''4;/0�``Z / "`f". OFI CIAL SEAL PEC i H. BRUEHL NOTARY = BLIC - CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Comm. Expires Aug. 25, 1593 rj yy PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 3-3-92 gv6C /15 - Introduce self. name, residence address, & address of property to be re -zoned. Purchased property in question: March 6, 1974. Conducted a marine engineering & oceanographic business thru 1987, at which time I leased (5yr.) the property to Mr. Dave Dennee, (Dennee's Furniture) November 1987. Lease expires Nov. 1992. Personal: Note: I'm not a developer!! Native of So. bay - born in L. A. raised in Manhattan Bch., lived my adult life in Redondo Bch. & conducted my business life in Hermosa Bch. I have always strived to assist the public and better our environment evidenced by my achievements in the Oceanographic field. 1. Self employed. a. Supported all community activies, Police, fire, chamber, etc. 2. Developed programs to make our beaches cleaner, established a marine biological base for Santa Monica Bay, and Initiated the first rapid respond oil spill containment and clean up program for Chevron U.S..A. to protect our beaches and marine environment. 3. Now as I approach retirement I would like to spend some time at the beach with out all the pressure I've had to deal with in my life. The only place a can do this, is on the property I own!! POST OFFICE BOX 729 • REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90277 • (213) 379-8852 -I�} -- PLANNING DEPT. HERMOSA BCH. LIR I Purchased the property at 598 first st. Hermosa Bch.in good faith from a realtor as commercial property February 5, 1974, Operated it as commercial property personally until 1983. As a result of a personal injury forcing me into retirement I continued to keep the property as commercial, leasing it to Dave Dennee of Dennee furniture in Redondo Bch. ( it wasn't until July 1989) that I became aware my property was Zoned (OS). The result of selling a portion of my property to a developer! The City of Hermosa Bch. re -zoned that small portion of property to comply with the master plan, R-2. clearing the way for the Developer to build a multi unit condominium! Due to the recession we are in, it is a matter of survival for me to occupy this property. The fact 1 own it relieves me of all encumbrances except taxes, At this time a very important factor in my life!! It is my intention at this time to modify my property to comply with Hermosa's building code and live on the premise, but no more modification than is necessary to comply with the building code as a result of my having limited funds!! Sincerely /, arry Pecorellf i i ar) SUPPLEMENTAL INF0RMAT10N POST OFFICE BOX 729 • REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90277 • (213) 379-8852 — I S' 7 Mike Schubach Planning Director Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Bch. 90254-3885 Deference: Re -Zone Dear Mr. Schubach December 30, 1991 Alena with my application for a zone change I would like to give my reason for the change, and soiiie back ground. Financing is the reason, I cannot afford to make the monthly payments on my home in San Pedro which carries a large loan balance. I can afford to live at 598 first st. because I own it free and clear! I purchased this niece of property in March of 1974 from a Mr. John E. Schmolle. It was sold to me as commercial, manufacturing piece of property. I do not know exactly how long Mr. Schmolle owned'it, I suspect several years. Mr. Schmolle was a long time resident of Hermosa Bch., his son was on the Hermosa Bch. Police Dept. I operated my business, Aqua Contractors & Oceanographics Inc. from this property, 1974 through 1987 at which time I entered into a five year lease with Mr. Dave Dennee, "Dennee Furniture" who is currently conducting a furniture manufacturing, and storage business. All the time I've. owned the property, and Mr. Dennee has leased it we have been licensed by the city to conduct our business and we have supported the local Police & Fire Dept. with our contributions. In February of 1989 a developer purchased property located at the corner of was an extension of my lot. It both pieces of my property were as a complete surprise to me! bound by a 5 year lease and the the lease for me to re -zone. The City granted ISCO Industries a zone change for my corner piece of property zoned "O.S". The rest is history. I wish to change the zoning on my property to bring conformity with the Cities master plan, which for my R-2. a small piece of my first St. and ardmore, which was then I became aware that zoned "open space?" which came To complicate the matter I was owner did not want to give up it into area is POST OFFICE BOX 729 • REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90277 • (213) 379-8852 (P.2) In conversation .with Mr. Ken Robertson, Hermosa Beach Associate Planner, he suc7gested _ make known that my lot zoned R-2 could accommodate as many as 3 units. Please understand I'm not a developer, _ have no plans at this time to build any units. I simply wish to re -zone the property Sincerely/ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RE: NOTIFICATION LIST FOR: 598 FIRST STREET (4188-027-027) I hereby certify to the best of my knowledge the attached Ownership List contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County of Los Angeles within the project site and for a distance of three hundred (300') feet from the project site of property, legally described as shown above, and that said list also contains the resident addresses within the same above referenced area. It is hereby stipulated that the City of Hermosa Beach is not responsible for any portion of this list. I, the undersigned, do declare under penalty of perjury that I did on the 2nd day of April, 1992 deposit in the United States Post Office, first class postage prepaid, a copy of the public notice attached as Exhibit "A" to each and every person attached as Exhibit "B". I warrant that the persons named on Exihibit "B" are all the persons required by applicable law to receive the public notice attached as Exhibit "A". I understand and agree that it is my responsibility to cause these public notices to be made in an accurate and timely fashion and agree to hold the City harmless against any liability whatsoever for the preparation of notification radius and determination of occupancy recipients. In the event an action is instituted in a court of competent juristiction which questions the legality of the public notices, then the City may in its exclusive discretion suspend all hearings or cause the cessation of any construction or of any use which was permitted as a result of a hearing which was held in accordance with the public notice. In the event that the court declares the notice or noticing procedure to be defective, then the City may in its exclusive discretion revoke any permits granted and cause any approvals given pursuant to those public notices to be declared null and void and I agree on behalf of myself and my heirs, assigns or successors -in -interest to hold the City harmless in connection therewith. I declare under penalty or perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. CATHY SCHULTF STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS On April 2, 1992, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Cathy Schulte, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that she executed the same. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL. SIGNATURE,c'G'��� (8 OFFICIAL SEAL 1 LAURICE M. DUKE Notary Public • California PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN L A. COUNTY MY Comm. Exp. Mor. 12, 1993 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 3/3/92 PARKS Within 100 vds. of 598 first st. (Kay Etows park) Monterey Blvd. and Herondo. (Pacific Coast Hwy. Beatification project Park) - approx. - 1 acre. location, Pacific Coast hwy. and Herondo. S./W. corner. within 3 blocks of 598 first st. (Public works park Div.) approx. - 1/2 acre. Within 10 blocks of 598 first St. End of Cypress St. on valley between second and sixth st. 3 acre Park. (Clark Stadium Park) on Valley between eights & eleventh approx. 5 acres. Has, base ball diamond, tennis courts, basketball court, lawn bowling, and recreation hall. Within 1/2 miles of 598 first st. (Hermosa Valley Park), Gould and Valley Dr. - approx. 2 acres (Hermosa Valley School Play ground) on valley Dr. approx. 1 acre (old railroad right of way park) between valley Dr. and ardmore runs from Herondo on the South to Manhattan Bch. Blvd. on the North, (2.6miles long by approx. 200ft. wide) 63 acres of park. (In Hermosa Bch. alone - North of Herondo. West of P.C.H., & East of the Pacific Ocean!) within comfortable walking distance of 598 first st. there are 751/2 acres of park !! April 2, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the City Council April 14, 1992 REQUEST FROM FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff that Council approve the request from Fleet Feet Triathlete to sponsor a sprint triathlon in the City of Hermosa Beach on Sunday, October 18, 1992 and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached contract. BACKGROUND Michael Epstein, event coordinator for Hermosa Beach Fleet Feet Triathlete, filed an application with the Department of Community Resources to hold an inaugural sprint triathlon in Hermosa Beach in the fall of 1992. Co -sponsoring the event will be Project Touch, a Hermosa Beach based nonprofit organization. The proposed triathlon consists of : 1) 1/4 mile swim 2) 9 mile bike (a portion will be in Redondo Beach) 3) 3 mile run The race course is attached for Council review. The course logistics have been reviewed and conceptually approved by Hermosa Beach Police, Redondo Beach Police, Community Resources Department, City of Redondo Beach staff and Los Angeles County Lifeguards relating to public safety and neighborhood issues. At the March 25th meeting of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission, the Commission approved the permit application to be forwarded to Council for final approval with one amendment to the contract for Fleet Feet to notice affected residents. ANALYSIS The Commission and staff are in support of this event for the following reasons: 1. A local Hermosa Beach business is sponsoring the event. 2. It will benefit a Hermosa Beach based non profit organization. 3. The race length, course, day and time proposed would have a minimal impact on the City. 4. A triathlon would provide the City with an exciting sporting event. Hermosa Beach Fleet Feet Triathlete (73 Pier Ave) opened its doors in August of 1990. They have sponsored the Sand and Strand Run for the past two (2) years and co-sponsored the Splash and Dash in July 19 1991. The co-sponsor, Project Touch, plans to incorporate the race in their program goals and objectives. The philosophy of Project Touch is that fitness can be used as an alternative to unstructured, unsupervised leisure time. Several youths will be offered the opportunity to be trained by experienced triathletes and will be provided with scholarships for participation. The Hermosa Beach sprint triathlon would consist of a maximum of 400 participants competing for 1st through 5th place in their respective age division. It is estimated that approximately 500 spectators will attend. Staff determined that the event coordinator, Michael Epstein, has a history of providing well organized, safety conscious events through conversations with city staff of Malibu and Ventura who have hosted triathlons coordinated by Mr. Epstein. Per the Special Event Permit Ordinance, fees for the event will be set at $1,570. Additional fees incurred by the City and the County will be the responsibility of Fleet Feet Triathlete. The race will begin on Sunday morning at 7:30. Participants will start in heats of fifty (50) in three (3) minute increments with the entire event concluding by 10:00 am. With this race schedule, the impact on the City will not be as great. The bike leg of the race is designed to allow for as much normal traffic flow as possible without compromising participant safety. It is noteworthy that the City's schedule of races has diminished in recent years (i.e. the City no longer hosts two 10K runs) leaving space for the triathlon on the City's roster. If approved, this Hermosa Beach event will be the only triathlon in the South Bay benefiting the large population of athletes in the area. Other alternatives for Council consideration include: 1. Do not approve the event. 2. Request more information. 2 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application 2. Proposed event outline 3. Course maps 4. Contract Concur: r Director ity Resources Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager 3 Respectfully submitted, Carol Belser Recreation Specialist Dept. of Community Resources Noted for Fiscal Iipact: Viki Copeland, Director Finance Department City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 318-0280 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION Organization's Name: Fleet Feet Triathlete Profit Non -Profit X Non-profit Number • Organization's Address: 73 Pier Ave Hermosa Beach, CA Phone Number(s): Zip Code 90254 798-1255 or Michael Epstein (818)880-4915 Contact Person and Title: Michael Epstein Event Coordinator Contact Person's Address: P.O. Box 9122 Calabasas, Ca 91372 Zip Code 91372 Daytime Phone Number:880-4915 Evening Phone Number:880-4915 r r Brief Description.of Event: 'Sprint Triathlon - to be staged at Pier ave (west end). Swim to be held around pier, bike to be a double loop on Hermosa Ave., run out and back on bike path. Date(s) of Event: October 18th Location(s) of Event: Pier ave. (west end), Hermosa ave., Bike path. Set-up Time: 1:00 pm October 17th. Time Event is to Commence: 7:A0 am October 18th Number of Participants (Including volunteers): Anticipated Number of Spectators: •x444 =;pp Oso Number of Vehicles Involved and How Used:.4,One truck for race equipment, 3 motorcycles to monitor course. Description of Set-up for this Event: Staging area - snow fencing bike racks, finish line, banners, PA system., stage for awards. Bike course - Cones to separate bikers from cars, Run course - Cones to indicate direction, aid station at turnaround. Additional Information or Special Requests: ucets This is an excellent community event that will promote health and welfare in the local area. Fleet I Feet requests that the City merely provide its assistance in securing permission to use the course and does not request any type of financial support. Fees, Charges and Other Requirements: Police Costs . $T'o 124 Ck-i-erfvuriv(9 Fire Costs $ Business License $ Public Works Costs $ Processing Fee $ \+ 5-70 Other Costs $ Total Due $ Refundable Damage Deposit $ Damage Deposit is due: Balance of fees incurred are due: Insurance Required: Yes/' No Date Received Unless greater or lessor coverage is requested, applicant agrees to furnish the City of Hermosa beach evidence of $1 million comprehensive general liability insurance in the form of a certificate, covering the entire period of this permit, naming the City of Hermosa Beach and its employees as additional insured. Expiration Date . Permittee waives claims against the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees, for fees or damages caused by, arising out of, or in any way connected with the exercise of this permit. APPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND TO MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION AHD TO RETURN SAID PREMISES IN THE SAME CONDITION AS THEY WERE BEFORE SAID USE. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ALL FEES, CHARGES AND OTHER NECESSARY MATERIAL WILL BE PAID AND/OR FURNISHED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES AS MUTUALLY AGREED TO BY BOTH PARTIES. Company Representative Date Permit to be processed through City Council: Yes}( No If YES, Council's decision: Application is invalid without the following signatures: Department of Community Date Resources Police Department Date Authorization Fire Department Date Authorization if Required Life Guard Authorization Date Needed on all Water Events Hermosa Beach Sprint Triathlon Proposed Event Outline - revised 3/10/92 Date: October 18th, 1992 Time: 7:30am Distance: 1/4 mile swim, 10 mile bike, 3 mile run Entrants: 400 Proposed Charity: Project Touch Event Producer: Fleet Feet Triathlete Contact: Bob Evans 798-1255 Event Director: MESP Contact: Michael Epstein (818) 880-4915 Timeline (estimated): 8 waves @50, 3:00 min between waves 1st Swimmer 7:34 Last Swimmer 8:10 1st biker on course 7:38 Last bike on course 8:20 1st bike off course 8:05 Last bike off course 9:05 1st Finisher 8:20 Last Finisher 9:50 81138804967 MESP 275 PO4 - MAP 15 '92 10:59 SWIM COURSE 1-R5 Pier p1� . �.03014- ♦ S? lAt NIVitk HERMOSA, \V BEACH 441. ^_ter. fH...:at KEATS PARA CGSTA 118 ROCKEF' HUNTINI »ULtJf EE C SPEYEI ZI W I HERMOSA BEACH PROPOSED BIKE COURSE \ ZN CARLSON LN SPR CK PJ r1 5 -‘•-• •14L. .) I r1t;' MUNICIPAL PIER /MONS TAD PIER 1 - -.. VETERANS PARK AINSW REDONDO CITY BEACH a A ST 8188.80 3?r ME' ;F 279 FT -17 MAR 11; 'q2 10:58 The Strand Beach Dr. Transition Area Finish RUN COURSE -- BEGIN AT PIER AVE ON ST ND, HEAD NORTH, TURN AROUND AT NORTHERN BOUNDARY, HEAD SOUTH, T RN AROUND A' SOUTHERN BOUNDARY, FINI.H AT PIER A • • 4 s HERMOSA BEACH FLEET FEET SPRINT TRIATHLON CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT CONTRACT This contract is entered into on May 1, 1992, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between the HERMOSA BEACH FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY), with regard to the FLEET FEET SPRINT TRIATHLON on October 18, 1992. FEES Permit fee shall be $1,570. A non-refundable application processing fee of $500 will be required. The deposit will be applied toward the permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the City. All predetermined costs/fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the Tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by the CITY on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the CITY. SECURITY/TRAFFIC CONTROL The City of Hermosa Beach shall provide as many officers as deemed necessary by the Public Safety Director for the event and all cost of officers shall be assumed by FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE. CLEAN-UP FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE will clean the area following the event and provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: . Pier Avenue (impacted area) . Beach (impacted area) . Strand (impacted area) or additional trash receptacles as needed. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE shall assume all costs for lifeguards required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. The County shall have the authority to cancel or re-route the swim portion of the race depending on surf conditions. The CITY requires written confirmation from the County on the number of Lifeguards needed to insure maximum safety for the summer event. INSURANCE Thirty (30) days prior to the Event, FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE shall provide the CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles their officers, employees and agents as 1 additional insured with a minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to contribute. Said insurances shall not be canceled or terminated without at least ten (10) days written notice to the CITY. FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. All participants will be required to show waivers on behalf of the CITY. FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE will assume full responsibility for insuring the waivers are signed by said participant and shall assume cost for reproduction of the waivers. ADVERTISING City of Hermosa Beach shall permit two street banners to be posted for event. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE. PARKING FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE shall be required to direct participant parking in CITY lots through advertising and race flyers. SPECIAL EVENTS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events requested to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY shall post temporary "No Parking" signs along race course where appropriate. All costs to reserve parking will be paid by FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE. The CITY shall allow access to Tournament site for set-up twelve (12) hours prior to the event. The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue, Beach Drive to the Strand for event staging area. No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID AGREEMENT. MISCELLANEOUS FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE RESPONSIBILITIES FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE shall notice affected residents/businesses of race. City staff will determine areas to be noticed. FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE shall provide as many portable port -a -johns as determined necessary by CITY staff. FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and personnel necessary for conducting such an event. Event shall be conducted in compliance with City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances on file at the Department of Community Resources. ATTEST: DATE: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH By MAYOR CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY DEPT. OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES DIRECTOR FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE PRESIDENT DATE: 3 April 6, 1992 City Council Meeting April 14, 1992 Mayor and Members of City Council INITIATIVE PETITION TO CREATE AND DESIGNATE THE BILTMORE SITE AS OPEN SPACE 0-8-2 FOR ITS PRESERVATION AND USE AS A PUBLIC PARK An initiative petition was submitted March 25, 1992, by Parker Herriott concerning a proposed measure to repeal Ordinance No. 91-1062 (which was approved by the voters November 5, 1991) and create and designate the Biltmore site as Open Space O -S-2 for its preservation and use as a public park. The petition was submitted within the 180 -day time period. The Clerk's office completed its review of the petition April 2, 1992, and has accepted the petition for filing, since it was determined that the number of signatures (2,610), prima facie, exceeds the minimum number of signatures required (1,226 = 10 percent for regular election; 1,839 = 15 percent for special election). The proponent is requesting consolidation with the November presidential election if the initiative qualifies for a special election. The petition has been hand -delivered to the Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder's office, with a request for signature verification within the permitted 30 -day time period, to be completed by May 1, 1992. If the petition is found to be sufficient, it will be presented to City Council at its next regular meeting after the verification is complete. Elaine Doerfli g, 'ty Clerk Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager 1 1b SCALE: 1"= 40' VESTING SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET PARCEL MAP NO. 21279 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 14. GLORIETTA VILLA TRACT, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 9. PAGE 111 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES PIAI ENGINEERING SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT: I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE SUBDIVIDER OF THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES, AND I CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION. ROBERT F'. BA#R, (SUBDIVIDER) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS. ON 04'7: 22_, /77 / BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED ROBERT F. BAYER PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME. NOTARY PUBLIC -LAURIE PIAI PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUGUST 2, 1993 CONDOMINIUM NOTE: THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR TWO UNITS WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE COMMON AREAS WHICH WILL, IN TURN. PROVIDE THE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. FD. L&T PER PARCEL MAP NO. 19969, P.M.B. 229-65 1- gzc V V 25-8-4 FD. L&T PER PARCEL MAP NO. 19969, P.M.B. 229-65 STREET N76° 34100.E o N76°34'00 -E E'LY LINE OF W'LY LINE LOT 13,* LOT 15,* 40.00' N'LY LINE OF N76°34'00"E LOTS 2 AND 3, / TRACT NO. 7594, M.B. 121-18 ,!'R 6 1992 ENGINEER'S STATEMENT: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVI- SION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF ROBERT F. BAYER IN SEPTEMBER, 1990. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. VICTOR J. PIAI,/R.C.E. 20327 )XPIRES 9-30-93 RECORD DATA NOTE: RECORD DATA IS FROM GLORIETTA VILLA TRACT, M.B. 9-111. RECORD OWNERS: JOHN M. FERRARO, ROBERT F. BAYER AND S.J. BAYER. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. DATE ,&//.7 XYZ R•C.E:-s- SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE: $ P. ^!"' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT, AND WHICH MAY BE PAID IN FULL, HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. DATE CITY TREASURER, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY MOTION ADOPTED AT ITS SESSION ON THE DAY OF 199_,APPROVED THE ANNEXED MAP. DATE CITY CLERK, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY PLANNER'S CERTIFICATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE DAY OF 19 . DATE SECRETARY OF PLANNING COUNTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP, THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO BY THE CITY ENGINEER. COUNTY ENGINEER DATE: BY' DEPUTY ,q.c. E : EXF EASEMENT NOTE: CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY, EASEMENT HOLDER FOR WATER PURPOSES AS DISCLOSED BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1617 PAGE 47 SAID EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE. LEGEND INDICATES THE' BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP. * REFERS TO GLORIETTA VILLA TRACT, M.B. 9-111 PIPELINE OF DEEDS. PRINTED APR O6 1992 I if