Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/12/92fr • 5iEHD Si2i2 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, May 12, 1992, at the hour of 7: P.M. CLOSED SESSION - the closed session was held at 6: P.M. regard- ing matters of Employee Meet and Confer; and, potential litiga- tion: pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b). The closed session was recessed at 7: P.M. to the regular scheduled public meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - 0/2 ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Essertier Absent: None PROCLAMATION - Public Works Week, May 17 through May 23, 1992. EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER - Terry Hindman, Clerk Typist, Public Works Department Robert Blackwood, Personnel Director, presented the Employee of the Quarter award plaque to Terry Bindman, Clerk Typist, of the Public Works Department and congratulated her on her accomplish- ments. An employee since 1984, Terry Bindman always accepts ad- ditional responsibility; notably by identifying and analyzing "billable tasks" performed by the field maintenance crews; and accepting the preparation of the Public Works Department Operat- ing Budget, thus averting a "budget deadline crisis". Pio Mrd /612 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., City Council Minutes 05-12-92 Page 1 oI • Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, Edie Webber - 1210 Eleventh Street, OGene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, CC' & A) J ; (6),( JV 1 P 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (k), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3 but are listed in order for clarity: (a) , (b) , (c) (d) , (e) , (f) , (g) , (i) , (j) , and (k) . Motion & , second . So ordered. Coming forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar were: No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on April 28, 1992. Action: To approve the minutes of April 28, 1992 as City Council Minutes 05-12-92 Page 2 • (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. 40639 through 40725 inclusive and Nos. 40727 through 40772 inclusive; noting voided warrants Nos. 40639, 40640, 40641, 40671, 40727, 40728, 40729, 40745, and 40747. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) (e) Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. Recommendation to receive and file the April, 1992 in- vestment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated May 5, 1992. Action: To receive and file the April, 1992 investment report as presented. Recommendation to extend for thirty days the temporary appointment of the Acting General Services Director and an Acting Police Sergeant. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 28, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to extend for thirty (30) days the temporary appointment of: 1) Acting General Services Director; filling of this position is being held pending review of the or- ganizational structure of the Parking Enforcement Division; and, 2) Acting Police Sergeant; the Department has request- ed this temporary appointment be continued until May 21, 1992 for continued shift supervision during City Council Minutes 05-12-92 Page 3 • (f) (g) the medical leave of one sergeant and the vacation of another. Recommendation to approve Project Touch lease renewal for Rooms 3 and 11 at Community Center. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 4, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to renew for one (1) year the Project Touch leases for: 1) room 3 of the Community Center; monthly rent of $423 ($.80 per square foot X 529 sq. ft.) until July 1, 1992; monthly rent of $444 ($.84 per square foot X 529 sq. ft.) for the remainder of the year; and, 2) room 11 of the Community Center; monthly rent of $320 ($.80 per square foot X 400 sq. ft.) until July 1, 1992; monthly rent of $336 ($.84 per square foot X 400 sq. ft.) for the remainder of the year. All other conditions of the lease renewals to remain the same. And, to authorize the Mayor to sign the agreements. Recommendation to adopt resolution of intent requesting study by Planning Commission re. Section 4-2(6) of the Zoning Code relating to home occupation regulations. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated May 5, 1992. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-5535, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE PLANNING COM- MISSION TO STUDY SECTION 4-2(6) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO HOME OCCUPATION REGULATIONS." City Council Minutes 05-12-92 Page 4 • (b) (j) Recommendation to receive and file 1992-93 budget calen- dar, and to extend the date for submission of the 1992- 93 Preliminary Budget from May 15, 1992 to June 4, 1992. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated May 6, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) extend the date for submission of the 1992-93 Pre- liminary Budget from May 15, 1992 to June 4, 1992; and, 2) receive and file the 1992-93 Budget Calendar. il?.;://p3 7/1 Recommendation to adopt resolution of denial without prejudice for three -unit condominium project at 1901 Pacific Coast Highway. Memorandum from Planning Direc- tor Michael Schubach dated May 6, 1992. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-5536, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, A CONDITIONAL USE PER- MIT, PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO CONSTRUCT A THREE UNIT CONDOMINIUM UPON PROPERTY LO- CATED AT 1901 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY." Recommendation to receive and file Planning Department list of current and future studies initiated by either the Planning Commission or City Council. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 5, 1992. a i°� in/E-of /602 14/ tv City Council Minutes 05-12-92 Page 5 • (k) Action: To approve the staff recommendation to confirm the priority list of current and future studies ini- tiated by Planning Commission and/or City Council. Recommendation to appropriate $24,000 from the General Fund Contingency account to the City Treasurer Contract Services account to pay 1991-92 fiscal year Bank of American banking service charges. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated May 5, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to ap- propriate $24,000 from the General Fund Contingency ac- count to the City Treasurer Contract Services account to pay 1991-92 fiscal year Bank of America banking service charges. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO COUNCIL CORRESPONDENCE; AVAILABILITY TO THE PUBLIC. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated May 5, 1992. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 92-106g. Motion 4 , second d -,C. So ordered, noting the objec- tions of /Ue-,-C6't-e Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 92-106', entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO COUNCIL CORRESPONDENCE; AVAILABILI- TY TO THE PUBLIC." Motion eq, second.' City Council Minutes 05-12-92 Page 6 • AYES: NOES: 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1(a) , (b) , (c) , (d) , (e) , (f) , (g) , and (k) were heard at this time, but are for clarity. (h), (i), (j), shown in order * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. The meeting recessed at P.M. The meeting reconvened at P.M. The order of the agenda was suspended at •P.M. to go to the public hearing, Item No. 5. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS/LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) (b) Letter from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated May 4, 1992, commending the Fire and Police Departments for a job well done under dangerous conditions. Recommenda- tion: to receive and file. Action: To receive and file. Motion , second . So ordered. Letter from June Williams, 2065 Manhattan Ave., dated May 2, 1992, regarding budget review. Recommendation: to receive and file. ,4,1,,,,c6c/17.1e--4--70-b ',701 ' -- Action: To receive and file. Motion/, second '. So ordered. City Council Minutes 05-12-92 Page 7 • PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. HEARING REGARDING REMOVAL OF PARKING ON THE HERMOSA VAL- LEY GREENBELT. Memorandum from Community Resources Di- rector Mary Rooney dated May 4, 1992. Supplemental memorandum from Community Resources Administrative Aide Marsh Ernst dated May 1 1992. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. C',9 �'j� �, The public hearing was opened at 8:45 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: � /cm_ e 0,d 9 %Aito=2-L . 7 u /t -or. et/ ± v 1c= 4:'72 6.5 I,4 Lt7a rc,69:‘ L‘At-,,e- de -3 -- x 74 v , City Council Minutes 05-12-92 Page 8 Nt,„ \i.,4 .,A. N\ T r. t. , ‘, -\,. .‘„1. ' t / q / -tA "I\ N , C' \O, N4'.\:4 L a s%s \Y\'(.k, c.N r';3'ND-‘ (‘,, k \\ \. \k/ V\ / I ‘ / .‘ ,1 0 ,,\ °'\'`,JI ' ‘\,)\ .r,k u, kr ,( ,4c\ ce'\(. ig . N\up Ga �� ��� ` ��!\,, yi0, t'',, l'H d) % x , '1' -› 0-L- , \k\ !\) ' 't\\\- tri.,\, \ci i ,,„\\,''.1 Y'N-) ‘./( ) 1 ..\''t • • The public hearing was closed at 9. P.M. _-/#1./v e,,/9 �-� = 14/ Proposed Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission to select rendering "A", allowing limited, restricted parking on the Greenbelt in front of City Hall. Motion , sec •.• The motion I4 -1 Propose • •ction: Action: To continue the parking Greenbelt across from City Hall. Motion , second . The motion objections of yf J � hl )A-7 ) r 2 restrictions on the carried, noting the g I; 1' 6. CONTINUED HEARING ON PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE TO R-2 TO BRING INTO CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AT 598 FIRST STREET. (Continued from April 14, 1992 meeting.) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 6, 1992. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Council Minutes 05-12-92 Page 9 C 11 \ \-‘" -k- \ ,,, ) \z,,\) \ r -1\1 '\ \ ‘ i\ 4 ,1 \ 1 4 Adl/k L'i\ 0 %\.{ \ %N \ ';A, ).k‘l ( \ *0‘ \.,i / \ 1 4 / D / ) 3 • • 11Q� The continued public hearing was opened at JP:0 6 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: The public hearing was closed at P.M. Proposed Action: To approve the staff and Planning Com- mission recommendation to rezone the property to R-2 and introduc Ordinance No. 92-1067. Motion , second '. The motion 117 ,p( tz 1 Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. :::2 067, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA ACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP FROM OPEN SPACE TO R-2, TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, FOR THE PARCEL AT 598 FIRST STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARAT ON." Motion W, second E . AYES: f NOES: Proposed Action: To approve staff alternative No. 1: rezone to a residential Specific Plan Area, with the similar limitations as S. P. A.'s 3 and 4 but allow three units by introducing Ordinance No. 92-106 . Motion , second . The motion Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 92-106 , entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP FORM OPEN SPACE TO SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 10, FOR THE PARCEL AT 598 FIRST STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE City Council Minutes 05-12-92 Page 10 • DECLARATION." Motion , second AYES: NOES: Proposed Action: To approve staff alternative No. 2: rezone to R -2B, which would result in a maximum of 2=units, without using a special zoning designation for one small lot. Motion , second . The motion Proposed Action: To approve staff alternative No. 3: rezone to a residential Specific Plan Area, with a maxi- mum of two units, and similar restrictions as S.P.A.'s 3 and 4, by introducing Ordinance No. 92-106 . Motion , second . The motion Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance NO. 92-106 , entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP FROM OPEN SPACE TO SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 10, FOR THE PARCEL AT 509 FIRST STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion , Second AYES: NOES: MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF AGREEMENT FOR INSPECTION AND CON- TRACT ADMINISTRATION, SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION, CIP 88-406. Memorandum from Public Works Director dated City Council Minutes 05-12-92 Page 11 March 13, 1992. (Continued from March 24, April 14 and April 28, 1992 meetings.) /27/4 )).Po </7/ 8. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO ESTABLISHING AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE FOR ISSUANCE OF AN EXCEPTION TO THE REFUSE CONTAINER REQUIREMENTS. Memorandum from Building and Safety Di- rector William Grove dated April 21, 1992. (Continued from April 28, 1992 meeting.) Building and Safety Director Grove presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. i4o7/15DC —/4 7 4 -ti --zs �,. ) `fiction: To approve the staff recommendation and intro- duce Ordinance No. 92-106 . c'�,--z/N Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the . j dissenting votes of 2 /..7,7 .& 7 7V'e )44 6_ Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 92-106 , entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO ESTABLISHING AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE FOR ISSUANCE OF AN EXCEPTION TO THE REFUSE CONTAINER REQUIREMENTS." Motion , second AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Essertier NOES: None 9. REPORT FROM COUNCILMEMBERS BENZ AND EDGERTON ON RECON- FIGURATION OF PARKING LOT "E". 1#4-6--L4C) pf ,rte `,1! ` City Council Minutes 05-13-92 Page 12 1,/. � �,%�'`- ` ,,� ' --� , f--:,� /4--v 10. REPORT REGARDING AUTHORITY OF COMMISSIONERS. Memorandum from Vose dated May 5, 1992. City Attorney Vose responded to / 12) Y/e0 ._.) —6" 7-1%.--74-4‹. '' Action: To receive and file. Motion , second . The motion BOARD OF PARKING PLACE City Attorney Charles S. Council questions. c/9 /"'d>f, 4., �- -�, MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager Ferrin reported 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Certification of results of signature verification of an initiative petition to create and designate the Biltmore Site as Open Space O -S-2 for its preservation and use as a public park. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doer - fling dated April 28, 1992. spa h C C.Gt4-- 4-"*sL 4314 7 /c;. City Clerk Doerfling responded to Council questions. /914-"'9 Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-553 , entitled, A_ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA /.7.-‘1„0, BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 1992, FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF A PETITION INITIATIVE MEASURE RELATING TO OPEN SPACE ON THE BILTMORE SITE." Motion , second . So ordered. City Council Minutes 05-12-92 Page 13 ) A ( 0/e •-#0 9 Z.7 • / r IT pe- • (b) Further Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-553 , enti- tled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO RENDER SPECIFIED SERVICES TO SAID CITY RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 1992." Motion , second . So ordered. Further Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-55 , enti- tled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING A CITY MEASURE SUBMITTED AT THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 18, 1992, AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IM- PARTIAL ANALYSIS." Motion , second . So ordered. Final Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-55 , enti- tled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR A CITY MEASURE SUBMITTED AT THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 18, 1992." Motion , second . So ordered. Consideration of legal noticing contract alternatives. Memoran um from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated May 7, 1992. City Clerk Doerfling responded to Council questions. Action: To approve staff alternative No. 1: direct the City Clerk to negotiate an extension to the current con- tract for legal and display advertising with the Easy Reader newspaper for a specified period of time (one- year, two-year, three-year contract), as was previously 2 �� CitCouncil Minutes 05-12-92 Page 14 done. Motion Action: the Bid Display Motion , second . The motion To approve the Notice Inviting Sealed Bids and Forms for City Advertising (Legal Notices and Ads), for a period of years. , second . The motion 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. Request by Councilmember Benz for an analysis of the voluntary curfew declaration and to request staff to establish emergency coordination with Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach. ierz,,/ _2/ //7 ?itz,v City Council Minutes 05-12-92 Page 15 • (b) Request by Councilmember Benz to discuss cutting ter- minal maintenance and using fees to buy PCs with ter- minal emulation software. gs- ,„, CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: (Th' Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street,Y1 June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, TV> .4.E4;1 ------ ave Reimer, - 802 Monterey Blvd.,. -57--',/6,-) erry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., c..... Shirley Cassell 611 Monterey Blvd. , `'7,r->, 44.,i, ...40 arker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street;(, 0 „mac Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, /'Q'Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, /J/� �r.� Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, �BS�� �� Edie Webber - 1210 Eleventh Street, ^ �} �` 0 Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, ---Y Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street 6.) 4)/‘ v L _ cb, eJ----"C- g") ) 4)-, .=--/ ADJOURNMENT TO SPECIAL WORKSHOP MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION AND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO BE HELD MAY 14, 1992 AT 7:30 P.M. - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, May 13, 1992, at the hour of 12:/Y A.M. to the Special Workshop Meeting to be held on Thursday, May 14, 1992 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 05-12-92 Page 16 Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or oral- ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet com- pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be- gin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form_ of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni- ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or- dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi- nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. �P.) 55 3411 "Friends come and go, but enemies accumulate." -Thomas F. Jones, Jr. AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 12, 1992 - Council Chambers, City Hall MAYOR Robert Essertier MAYOR PRO TEM Albert Wiemans COUNCILMEMBERS Robert Benz Sam Y. Edgerton Kathleen Midstokke Closed Session - 6:30 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch INTERIM CITY MANAGER Steve Wisniewski CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart- ment, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Cham- ber of Commerce. During the meeting a packet also is available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PROCLAMATION: Public Works Week, May 17 through May 23, 1992. EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER: Terry Bindman, Clerk Typist, Public Works Department PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". 1. ( CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the - 1 - majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on April 28, 1992. (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the April, 1992 in- vestment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated May 5, 1992. (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) Recommendation to extend for thirty days the temporary appointment of the Acting General Services Director and an Acting Police Sergeant. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 28, 1992. Recommendation to approve Project Touch lease renewal,) for Rooms 3 and 11 at Community Center. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 4, 1992. Recommendation to (adopt resolution} of intent requesting studybyPlanning''Commission re. Section - 1 4 2'(6) of the Zoning Code relating to home occupation regulations. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated May 5, 1992. Recommendation to receive and file 1992-93 budget calen- dar, and to extend the date for submission of the 1992- 93 Preliminary Budget from May 15, 1992 to June 4, 1992. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated May 6, 1992. Recommendation to adopt resolution of denial without prejudice for thr a -unit condominproject at 1901 Pacific Coast Highway. Memorandum from Planning Direc- tor Michael Schubach dated May 6, 1992. Recommendation to receive and file Planning Department list of current and future studies initiated by either the Planning Commission or City Council. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 5, 1992. (k) Recommendation to appropriate $24,000 from the General Fund Contingency account to the City Treasurer Contract 2 Services account to pay 1991-92 fiscal year Bank of American banking service charges. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated May 5, 1992. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) AN (RDINANCE) OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO COUNCIL CORRESPONDENCE; AVAILABILITY TO THE PUBLIC. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated May 5, 1992. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS/LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) (b) Letter from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated May 4, 1992, commending the Fire and Police Departments for a job well done under dangerous conditions. Recommenda- tion: to receive and file. Letter from June Williams, 2065 Manhattan Ave., dated May 2, 1992, regarding budget review. Recommendation: to receive and file. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. HEARING REGARDING REMOVAL OF PARKING ON THE HERMOSA VAL- LEY GREENBELT. Memorandum from Community Resources Di- rector Mary Rooney dated May 4, 1992. 6. CONTINUED HEARING ON PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE TO R-2 TO BRING INTO CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AT 598 FIRST STREET. (Continued from April 14, 1992 meeting.) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 6, 1992. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF AGREEMENT FOR INSPECTION AND CON- TRACT ADMINISTRATION, SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION, CIP 88-406. Memorandum from Public Works Director dated March 13, 1992. (Continued from March 24, April 14 and April 28, 1992 meetings.) 8. AN ORDINANCE »MENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE WI RESPECT/TO ESTABLISHING AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE FOR ISSUANCE OF AN EXCEPTION TO THE REFUSE CONTAINER REQUIREMENTS. Memorandum from Building and Safety Di- rector William Grove dated April 21, 1992. (Continued from April 28, 1992 meeting.) 9. REPORT FROM COUNCILMEMBERS BENZ AND EDGERTON ON RECON- FIGURATION OF PARKING LOT "E". 10. REPORT REGARDING AUTHORITY OF BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS. Memorandum from City Attorney Charles S. Vose dated May 5, 1992. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Certification of results of signature verification of an initiative petition to create and designate the Biltmore Site as Open Space O -S-2 for its preservation and use as a public park. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doer - fling dated April 28, 1992. (b) Consideration of legal noticing contract alternatives. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated May 7, 1992. 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (a) (b) Request by Councilmember Benz for an analysis of the voluntary curfew declaration and to request staff to establish emergency coordination with Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach. Request by Councilmember Benz to discuss cutting ter- minal maintenance and using fees to buy PCs with ter- minal emulation software. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT TO SPECIAL WORKSHOP MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION AND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO BE HELD MAY 14, 1992 AT 7:30 P.M. BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIRMAN JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS COUNTY OF SPOKANE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON FIRST VICE-CHAIRMAN PHIL M. HERRINGTON, C.B.O. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY RENO, NEVADA International Conference of Building Officials SECOND VICE-CHAIRMAN BOB FOWLER, P.E., AIA, C.B.O. DIRECTOR OF BUILDING INSPECTION ABILENE, TEXAS IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIRMAN EUGENE J. ZELLER, P.E., C.B.O. SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA RON BULLOCK CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL SANDY, UTAH PAUL T. EDGERTON MANAGER, BUILDING DIVISION VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON ROBERT J. EPPSTEIN, C.8.O. DIRECTOR, BUILDING AND SAFETY FREMONT, CALIFORNIA JAN P. GASTERLAND, C.8.O. BUILDING CODE OFFICER ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DOUGLAS E. HOOD, C.B.O. BUILDING OFFICIAL CHANDLER, ARIZONA KENNETH G. LARSEN, C.B.O. DIRECTOR OF BUILDING AND HOUSING CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA GORDON W. MURDOCH, P.E., C.B.O. BUILDING OFFICIAL DANA POINT, CALIFORNIA ALAN P. OLSON, R.A., C.B.O. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR PHOENIX, ARIZONA RON PERKEREWICZ, C.8.0. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTY OF KITSAP PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON THOMAS R. THOMPSON, C.B.O. BUILDING OFFICIAL BROOMFIELD, COLORADO ROBERT D. WEBER, P.E., C.B.O. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING COUNTY OF CLARK LAS VEGAS, NEVADA ALLEN 0. ZEPPER, C.B.O. BUILDING OFFICIAL STILLWATER, MINNESOTA FAX NUMBERS Order Department (213) 692-3853 Plan Review (213) 692-3425 ICBG ES, Inc. (213) 695-4694 Administration (213) 699-8031 Northern California (510) 463-3295 Indiana (317) 879-0966 Missouri (816) 741-9475 Texas (512)343.9116 Washington (206) 637-8939 5360 SOUTH WORKMAN MILL ROAD • WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90601 • (213) 699-0541 January 22, 1992 OFFICES OF PRESIDENT JAMES E. BIHR, P.E. EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT DONALD R. WATSON, P.E. Tim Shea Redondo Beach Building Department 415 Diamond Street Redondo Beach, California 90277 SUBJECT: Number of Exits from floors in individual dwelling units, Section 3303 (a) 1988 Uniform Building Code Dear Mr. Shea: On December 31, 1991 we received your letter asking: Q1. Does Section 3303 (a) Exception 2 allow for exit from the second floor when the occupant load of the individual dwelling unit is less than 10? Al. In a word, yes. Q2. Is this a correct interpretation of Chapter 33, Exit Requirements? A2. This question is in reference to a sketch of a three-story individual dwelling unit which has an occupied roof. The second and third floors of this unit have an area of 500 square feet with the roof deck having an area of less than 500 square feet. There are two exits from the roof deck to the third floor, two exits from the third floor to the second floor and one exit from the second floor. The exit from the second floor is a stairway that is separated from the garage on the first level. This condition is allowed by Section 3303 (a) of the 1988 Uniform Building Code as follows: 1. The second paragraph requires two exits from the roof. 2. Exception 3 to the fourth paragraph requires two exits from the dwelling unit as the area of that floor is 500 square feet. (In this case two exits are provided). 3. Exception 2 to the fourth paragraph allows one exit from the second floor provided two exits are not required by Table No. 33-A. Since the exception to the first paragraph Regional Offices: 6130 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 120 • Pleasanton, California 94588 • (415) 734-3080 7998 Georgetown Road, Suite 900 • Indianapolis, Indiana 46268 • (317) 879-1677 6738 N.W. Tower Drive • Kansas City, Missouri 64151 • (816) 741-2241 9300 Jollyville Road, Suite 101 • Austin, Texas 78759-7455 • (512) 794-8700 2122 -112th Avenue, N.E., Suite 8-300 • Bellevue, Washington 98004 • (206) 451-9541 Tim Shea January 21, 1992 Page 2 of Section 3302 (a) states in pertinent part, "Accessory use area which ordinarily are used by persons who occupy the main areas of an occupancy ... need not be included in computing the occupant load of the building." The roof deck need not be included when calculating the occupant load of the dwelling unit. The occupant load exiting from the second floor is less than 10, therefore, Table 33-A allows one exit from that floor. It is also noted that Section 3303 (a), last paragraph requires that the maximum number of exits required from a story be maintained until egress is provided from the building. Ordinarily this adds safety for the occupants because it is less likely that both exits will be blocked by a single event. It is also noted, however, that Exception 2 to Section 3309 (a) allows unenclosed stairways from individual dwelling units, therefore, the additional safety provided by more stairways that are unenclosed and close to each other is very minimal. One provides very little if any greater safety by adding additional unenclosed stairways. Therefore, applying the second exception to the fourth paragraph of Section 3303 (a) in a way which allows a single exit to the second floor seems appropriate. If we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to let me know. Sincerely, Tom Briggs, P.E. Manager, Codes and Engineering TAB:lv Exit Roof ac, K4soo Ex1t bot E)41±± 3r1)FLOo 5000 Dot 2N7) AI Ooh ()orti CARAE A INDIV1DuAL D\AiELUN6 �r , 5cALE Y 0) Does Sec cJ 3303(0.) EXC�P�'(UN 2 gLLOW FoR ONE EXIt- (-RON1 *V ecorir) FLove whet,, occ_krpAi,Tr G -06 T) oC" t rJDivr�u�L GwE���,iq Uti -1- is Less NnA� (U ? a Es +his A C_orc c-* i N+ERprefAi-►oi OF _CI -topics- -5-15 Rcputrer-)Ei.Tr S Z sw&A 1120 Aiea noee Say tivo,os,i 23 - CA Exit ThANk you FOR ourz. ttmE REOoNi7C) B C. ) \cr< S D -e.: . SIS boamD►IT) ST 1Z ED Beo-c k A °I O iT A-trEiurt(lU T+ m H E-_ Ar Timothy William Shea 1720 Ardmore Rd #304 Hermosa Beach California 90254 310-374-8558 April 30, 1992 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Councilmember, This letter is written on behalf of my brother his wife and two children who own and reside at #40 Seventh Court. They have had a extremely difficult time trying to provide a safe and secure home. Attempting to fix a flawed design while meeting all uniform building code exit requirements and Hermosa Beach municipal codes for open space it seemed impossible. Over the past several years they have submitted for numerous variances. These applications received no objections from surrounding neighbors and sympathy from board members. But to there disappointment the costly and time consuming variances and appeals were denied. Their hopes were revived in 1988 when the Uniform Building Code provided an exception for exiting from small dwellings. This code was not adopted by Hermosa Beach until 1990. As the Senior Building Inspector for The City Of Redondo Beach I am able to submit to the IBCO code publishers for an official interpretation. I did this without any indication of owners address or my involvement in this project. Strictly as a code question (see attached sketch). We were pleased to find the code had changed allowing the use of the third story roof as a deck which would provide the needed open space. We submitted the plans and IBCO approval to the Building Department for review and approval (see attached Mr Briggs PE Manager Codes and Engineering for IBCO). To their surprise and further disappointment it was denied. When questioning Mr Grove he only stated he disagreed. This position astounds us as this new code exception would resolve two previous variances. These were granted in 1973 to the first owners in order to permit the original construction of this home. We fail to see any down side to this solution as this increases the original open space from 182 square feet to 400 square feet and provides proper exiting from this dwelling. As we are all Hermosa Beach residents we know what it is like to live in a high density city. It is understandable that a homeowner would want to maximize the use and comfort of his home. As the council is the body that adopts these building codes we ask you for help in this matter. Thank -you for your time. Timothy W. Shea April 30, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 12, 1992 PRESENTATION OF OUTSTANDING EMPLOYEE AWARD The City of Hermosa Beach Employee Performance Award honors City Employees who have displayed either sustained performance above expected levels or have performed a one-time action which exceeds expectations. Nominations for the award may be made by citizens, City Council Members, department heads and other employees. From the nomina- tions, the Management Team selects the award recipient(s). For the second quarter of Fiscal Year 91-92 (Jan/Feb/Mar) the Management Team, after consideration selected the following em- ployee for recognition: Terry Bindman, Clerk Typist, Public Works Department Terry has been with the City since July 1984. Terry started her career with the City in the Planning Department. Terry became a member of the Public Works staff in 1988. Terry has continually demonstrated her value to the Public Works Department and the City. Special Projects just seem to say "Terry Bindman", such as identifying and analyzing "billable tasks" performed by the field maintenance crews. Terry is always willing to get involved; to lend a hand and repeatedly accepts additional responsibility. Terry's performance and willingness to take on additional tasks was noted in particular during this year's budget preparation. Terry accepted the task of preparing the Public Works Department Operating Budget. Because of her hard work, a "budget deadline crisis" was averted. This is a major accomplishment given the fact that the Public Works Department Budget is made up of ten separate divisions. It is now our pleasure to present Terry with a plaque to commemo- rate her selection as Employee of the Quarter. Respectfully Submitted: Concur: Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director pers/emp ,I.,,e4,,.,)P —,,___ Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, April 28, 1992, at the hour of 7:35 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Kathleen Midstokke, Councilmember ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Essertier Absent: None PROCLAMATIONS - City of Redondo Beach Centennial Celebration, April 29, 1992: Mayor Essertier read a proclamation congratulating the City of Redondo Beach on its Centennial Anniversary Celebration on April 29, 1992, gave a brief history of Redondo Beach and offered the proclamation to be stored in the "Treasure Chest - Time Capsule" to be opened in the year 2092. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Darryl Hughes - 127 29th Street, expressed concerns regarding private construction taking place on 30th Street, apparently on public right of way, in which a brick wall was being erected that restricts public access; submitted signatures; Councilmember Benz requested this matter be agendized and brought back within 30 days with a staff report. There was no objection from the Council. Mayor Essertier directed that staff notify the property owner that his encroachment permit is going to be the subject of Coun- cil consideration. Joanne Dunbabin - 2418 Manhattan Avenue, regarding item 4(a); stated that her home business qualified as a conditional use; submitted addi- tional information for Council consideration; Nina Ritter - 2415 Manhattan Avenue, submitted information regarding item 4(a); spoke in favor of the home business use; June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, asked to speak on item 1(i); questioned how the Council could modify.a CUP without a public hearing on the proposed modifications; and, Susan Collector - 919 15th Place, stated her daughter Rachel was to have received the "Stu- dent of the Month", and congratulated the City for their presentations, but questioned the criteria by which these students were selected. (The City has no part in the selection process.) City Council Minutes 04-28-92 Page 7777 a 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (j), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3 but are listed in order for clarity: (d) Wiemans, (e) Mid- stokke, (i) Edgerton, and (j) Edgerton. Motion Wiemans, second Benz. So ordered. Coming forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar were: Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., regarding item 1(g); suggested the City allow regular parking in green areas after normal delivery time is past. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on April 14, 1992. (b) Action: To approve the minutes of April 14, 1992 as presented. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants No. 40382 and Nos. 40501 through 40638 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 40503, 40504, 40524, 40560, 40561, and 40562. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the March, 1992 financial reports: 1) Revenue and Expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Wiemans for separate discussion later in the meeting, due to questions regarding the possibility of placing the fringe benefits in each department rather than a lump sum in the budget, in order to show the to- tal cost for the department. Finance Director Viki Copeland responded to Council questions. Action: To receive and file the March, 1992 financial reports as presented. City Council Minutes 04-28-92 Page 7778 (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) Recommendation to permit staff a time extension regard- ing vehicle parking on Beach Drive to more completely address this subject and brief the new City Manager. Memorandum from Deputy City Engineer Lynn Terry dated April 9, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To approve staff Alternative No. 2: to bring back to the Council as soon as possible, but delete the portion that reads, "...without waiting for the public comments.", and direct public hearings for the Planning Commission and the City Council. Motion Midstokke, second Wiemans. So ordered. Recommendation to receive and file auditor review of appropriation limit, internal control. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated April 20, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file: 1) the review of the 1990-91 Appropriation Limitation submitted by the City's auditor, Coopers and Lybrand; and, 2) the review of internal controls submitted by the City's auditor, Coopers and Lybrand. Recommendation to adopt resolution adding a portion of Longfellow Avenue to Resolution 89-5244, establishing a 15 minute green parking zone. Memorandum from City Traffic Engineer Edward J. Ruzak dated April 7, 1992. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-5534, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CERTAIN PORTIONS OF STREETS AS 15 MINUTE PARKING ZONES (GREEN ZONES)." Recommendation to receive and file third quarter CIP status report. Memorandum from Public Works Department dated April 16, 1992. Action: To receive and file the third quarter Capital Improvement Program (CIP) report which detail: 1) eleven (11) projects in progress; 2) eight (8) projects on hold; 3) six (6) projects completed; and, 4) three (3) projects not started, for a total dollar amount of $5.8 million. Recommendation to receive and file report on clarifica- tion of Written Communications. Memorandum from Mayor Essertier dated April 22, 1992. City Council Minutes 04-28-92 Page 7779 This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, objected to the proposed policy; objected strongly to pro- posed policy that the Mayor would review cor- respondence and determine its disposition; Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., objected to the proposed policy; agreed with June Williams; and, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, expressed reservations regarding the proposed policy. (j) Action: To reaffirm the previous Council policy that any citizen may request, through the offices of the City Clerk or the City Manager, that a written communication be placed on the agenda, and to direct staff to prepare an amendment to the Municipal Code to delete the portion of Section 2-2.5 that was referenced in Mayor Esser - tier's memorandum, "Correspondence addressed to the City Council shall not become a public record until received and filed by the Council at a regular, special or ad- journed regular meeting of the Council." Motion Midstokke, second Wiemans. So ordered, noting the objection of Mayor Essertier. Further Action: To allow members of the public to speak only once on an item, unless directed otherwise by the chair. Motion Edgerton. The action was so ordered by Mayor Essertier. Recommendation to initiate amendment to Resolution 90- 5422 to allow a reduced fee for fences requiring condi- tional use permits in response to letter regarding waiver of fees. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 8, 1992. Supplemental memorandum from Patricia Stoops, Assistant Planner, dat- ed April 28, 1992. Planning director Schubach responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Greg Klezek - 744 Longfellow Avenue, stated that building a fence to screen his yard from com- mercial activity at Vasak Polak will cost over $2,000 in City fees and requested the Council waive the fees; and, Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., commented that the fence could not be included at the Planning Commission meeting since it had not been noticed. City Council Minutes 04-28-92 Page 7780 Action: To approve the staff recommendation to initiate an amendment to Resolution 90-5422 to allow a reduced fee for walls and fences requiring Conditional Use Per- mits at a suggested rate of $519.75 ($200 Fee plus $319.75 Noticing Fee). Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered. (Note: the above Action was made, withdrawn, and reinstated but is shown once for clarity.) 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1(d) , (e) , (i) , and (j) were heard at this time, but are shown in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. The meeting recessed at 8:45 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:53 P.M. The order of the agenda was suspended at 8:53 P.M. to go to the public.hearing, Item No. 5. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS/LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC. (a) Letter from Joanne Dunbabin, Act II Electrology, 2418 Manhattan Ave., dated April 21, 1992. Building and Safety Director William Grove responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, spoke on the number of home businesses in the City; disa- greed with the Business License Department form letter; and, Burt Bussier - with Youth Basketball, spoke in favor of allowing home businesses; requested that Council clarify the Code to give a clearer indication of the type of businesses allowed and the restrictions imposed. Proposed Action: To "trash" the form letter from Busi- ness Licensing. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion was withdrawn. Proposed Action: To direct staff that the form letter sent out regarding removal of items of furniture and equipment, and which strictly prohibited clients and customers from entering a home, no longer be used. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion died due to the withdrawal of the second. City Council Minutes 04-28-92 Page 7781 Proposed Action: To refer the matter to staff to return with information regarding its authority to send the above referenced letter. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. Substitute Action: To stay enforcement on Dunbabin's item in relation to Section 4-2 of the Municipal Code as it relates to home businesses. Motion Mayor Essertier, second Edgerton. The substitute motion carried unanimously, thereby superseding all pre- vious motions. Final Action: To direct staff to bring back a Resolu- tion of Intent to refer the matter of home businesses to the Planning Commission for study. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. So ordered. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 1901 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 20, 1992. Supplemental letter from Gerald Comp- ton, 1200 Artesia Blvd., representing the owners, dated April 27, 1992. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 9:10 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this matter were: Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., architect for the project, explained that the property owners wished to know what the City would allow regarding height and setbacks before undergoing costly redesign; showed renderings of the pro- posed project and elevations of the surrounding area; requested the Council grant the appeal; Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, stated some of the Planning Commissioners' concerns on the item: sideyard intrusion into setback, bedroom size, possible future height restriction, and driveway slope; Diana Vidal - 930 First Street, appellant, questioned why some owners had been allowed sideyard averaging, but, they were not; also questioned why the size of one bedroom (of three) made a difference since it was above the size allowed by code; Brian Vidal - 930 First Street, appellant, stated there were no objections from neighbors regard- ing the proposed height; had used the current driveway for years without a problem and it was steeper than the proposed new driveway; Ninette McQuistion-Richardson - 1902 Pacific Coast City Council Minutes 04-28-92 Page 7782 Highway owner, stated the family florist busi- ness had been severely impacted by the parking restrictions imposed by CalTrans; felt the property was no longer usable as commercial; the, property had been in the family for many years and she and her two sisters wished to live in Hermosa, therefore wanted a three unit condominium so the property could be split eq- uitably; neighbors considered the new building an improvement to the area; and, Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., stated that the General Plan allowed averaging for setbacks, it was not unusual to use averaging as it allowed greater interest to a structure rather than a flat wall; stated that in order for a project to conform there must be non -contradictory rules in existence that apply to all projects equally. The public hearing closed at 10:05 P.M. Proposed Action: To approve the project as submitted, subject to the conditions in the Resolution to overturn the Planning Commission's denial. Motion Midstokke. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Action: To sustain the Planning Commission decision and deny the project due to the sideyard setbacks (not allow averaging) and the driveway slope, without prejudice, in order to allow resubmittal of the project within a specified time frame. Motion Edgerton, .second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes"of Midstokke and Wiemans. Further Action: To place a six month time limit for resubmittal and direct the City Attorney to bring back a Resolution setting forth the findings for the meeting of May 12, 1992. Motion Wiemans, second Benz. So ordered. The meeting recessed at 10:23 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 10:32 P.M. At 10:33 P.M. the order of the agenda was returned to Item 4(a). MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. STAFF RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PAY PHONES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated April 15, 1992. (Con- tinued from April 14, 1992 meeting.) Acting General Services Director Staten presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Council Minutes 04-28-92 Page 7783 Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Steven Shaw - Fidelity Communication Co., stated his company agreed with the staff recommenda- tions except for two pay phones located at 50 Pier Avenue which he considered necessary for public safety; requested these two phones be reconsidered; Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, objected to the high rate charged by private phone companies as opposed to those regulated by the Public Utili- ties Commission; asked if private phones could be forced to be identified and their rates made comparable to regulated phones if they were located on public property; Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., suggested the phone companies pay for the use of public prop- erty; and, Lynn Terry - Deputy City Engineer, stated that the two phones mentioned previously are obstructing the sidewalk. Action: To approve the staff recommendation for action regarding the privately owned payphones encroaching upon the public -right-of-way (PROW) of: 1) no action necessary on five (5) GTE and four (4) other phones for a total of nine (9) phones; 2) removal from PROW of seven (7) GTE and seven (7) other phones for a total of fourteen (14) phones; 3) rotation to remove nuisance of two (2) other phones for a total of two (2) phones;. 4) new encroachment permit for five (5) GTE and one (1) other phones for a total of six (6) phones; 5) add to existing encroachment permit for three (3) GTE phones for a total of three (3) phones; and, 6) no jurisdiction on two (2) GTE phones for a total of two (2) phones, for a total of 36 phones currently encroaching on public right-of-way. Motion Benz, second Midstokke. The motion carried unanimously. 7. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF ,AGREEMENT FOR INSPECTION AND CON- TRACT ADMINISTRATION, SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION, CIP 88-406. Memorandum from Public Works Director dated March 13, 1992. (Continued from March 24 and April 14, 1992 meetings.) Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Lynn Terry - Hermosa Beach Deputy City Engineer, spoke in support of paying the increase for the work that BSI had already done on additional inspections, due to 22 change orders which had lengthened the contract time, but, saved the City $82,587 in budgeted costs to the main con- tractor; and, City Council Minutes 04-28-92 Page 7784 Steven Velasco - Area Manager for BSI, stated that his company had applied for an increase some months ago and had continued working on the project with the expectation that the actual work time would be paid by the City. Proposed Action: To deny the additional disbursement. Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Essertier. The motion was withdrawn. Action: To send the item back to staff to have the City Attorney and the City Manager investigate and review the contractual agreements; interview staff members in- volved; determine if the City is legally liable for pay- ment; and, return with the findings at the meeting of May 12, 1992. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered. 8. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO ESTABLISHING AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE FOR ISSUANCE OF AN EXCEPTION TO THE REFUSE CONTAINER REQUIREMENTS. Memorandum from Building and Safety Di- rector William Grove dated April 21, 1992. Action: To continue this item to the meeting of May 12, 1992. Motion Midstokke, second Wiemans. So ordered. 9. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE EXTENSION OF CONTRACT WITH WARD-THK FOR THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATION SERVICES FOR LIABILITY CLAIMS. Memorandum from Risk Manager Robert Blackwood dated April 22, 1992. Risk Manager Blackwood responded to Council questions. Action: To direct staff to send the contract out to bid. Motion Mayor Essertier, second Edgerton. So_ ordered, noting the objections of Midstokke and Wiemans. 10. CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC NOTICE FOR SPECIAL STUDY OF HEIGHT LIMITATION IN THE R-3 AND R -P ZONES. Memorandum from Planning Commission dated April 22, 1992. Planning Director Schubach responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., suggested that all R-3 and R -P property owners should be noticed that their properties could be af- fected; and, volunteered physical help with the mailing; Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., suggested the City drop the proposed height limit; voluteered City Council Minutes 04-28-92 Page 7785 physical help on noticing; and, Mary McGee - (no address given), volunteered physical help with a notice to affected proper- ty owners. Action: To direct staff to follow normal procedures and notice this matter in the newspaper as it has been done in the past. Motion Edgerton, second Midstokke. So ordered, noting the objection of Wiemans. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - None 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) City Council Committee assignments - April, 1992. Memo- randum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April 15, 1992. (b) Action: To appoint Councilmember Midstokke to the West Basin Water Association in place of Councilmember Wie- mans; and retain the remainder of the current appointments. So ordered by Mayor Essertier with the consensus of the Council. Setting of time and topics for joint workshop meeting between the City Council, Planning Commission and Cham- ber of Commerce on May 14, 1992. Memorandum from Inter- im City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated April 22, 1992. Action: To approve the date of May 14, 1992, but change the hour to 7:30 P.M. for the joint workshop meeting between the City Council, Planning Commission and the Chamber of Commerce, with agenda topics to be: 1) downtown parking (Planning Commission); 2) ventilation of the City Council Chambers (Planning Commission); 3) one-stop business license (Chamber of Commerce); 4) business development officer (Chamber of Commerce); 5) sign and banner Ordinance (Chamber of Commerce); 6) conditional use permits (Chamber of Commerce); and, 7) R/UDAT (Chamber of Commerce); 8) current policy and handouts regarding business licensing; should it be under the City Treasurer (Midstokke); 9) improve communication between the Council and the Chamber (Midstokke); 10) how can the City help to encourage or attract busi- ness (Midstokke); 11) assistance from the Chamber regarding business property maintenance and trash enclosures (Midstokke); 12) define the function of R/UDAT; how close to re- development will it be (Wiemans); and City Council Minutes 04-28-92 Page 7786 13) new businesses not listed in the Code, will they require CUPs (Edgerton). Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Essertier. So ordered. (c) Request by Mayor Essertier for discussion of an amend- ment to the code re. home business licenses. This item was heard with item 4(a) 13) OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for update on Green- wood Hotel and remaining time on building permit. Building and Safety Director William Grove responded to Council questions and stated the permit was valid as long as any work was done within a six month period, and would become invalid if more work was not done by June 10, 1992. (b) Action: To direct staff to return with a report on the progress of the Hotel in June, 1992. Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Essertier. So ordered. Request by Councilmember Benz to obtain a PC with scan- ner so that copies of the Municipal Code can be down- loaded to any one in the public. Action: To authorize the City Manager to include the purchase of a scanner from the $50,000 allotted for a pilot Local Area Network computer program. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. So ordered. (c) Request by Councilmember Benz for analysis of VPD's au- thority to let contracts. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was:` Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., suggested the Council could review the City Attorney's memo- randum, prepared for the VPD, that outlined the Vehicle Parking District's authority. Action: To direct staff to prepare an agenda item for Council review that analyzes the transfer of authority from the Council to the Vehicle Parking District; and, that no contracts, or amendments to contracts, be made by the VPD until the review is made by the Council. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. So ordered, noting the objection of Midstokke. (d) Request by Mayor Essertier to establish a Police liaison sub -committee. City Council Minutes 04-28-92 Page 7787 Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., suggested the City recognize outstanding officers, or actions by officers, at an annual ceremony. Action: To establish a Police Liaison Sub -Committee. Motion Mayor Essertier, second Benz. So ordered, noting the objection of Midstokke. Further Action: To appoint Councilmember Wiemans to the Sub -Committee. Motion Wiemans, second Midstokke. So ordered. Final Action: To appoint Councilmember Benz to the Sub - Committee. Motion Edgerton. So ordered. CITIZEN COMMENTS CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, thanked the new City Manager for coming to Hermosa Beach; com- mented on unsigned letters circulated in the City; Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., questioned if the "work" done on the proposed Strand Hotel qualified it for the building time extension; opposed to lowering heights for R-3 property; and, Mary McGee - (no address given), opposed to lower- ing height limits; opposed to downzoning. Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., would like the Council to review the goals established by the Vehicle Parking District. Councilmember Midstokke welcomed Rick Ferrin, the new City Man- ager; announced that there would be a formal welcoming party for Mr. Ferrin on Monday, May 11, 1992, between 5:30 - 7:30 P.M., in the foyer at the Community Center, and invited residents to come and welcome Mr. Ferrin; asked that no Police time be spent on the unsigned letters circulating in the City; and, mentioned that she had suggested "Hire a Veteran" as a Proclamation of the City but since it had not been chosen was making the announcement tonight. Councilmember Wiemans welcomed Rick Ferrin; thanked Steve Wis- niewski, Interim City Manager, and Mary Rooney, Interim Assistant City Manager, for their work; and, asked the Council to analyze the direction this Council is taking the City. Councilmember Benz stated he was pleased with the direction the City was taking. Councilmember Edgerton welcomed Rick Ferrin and thanked Steve Wisniewski. City Council Minutes 04-28-92 Page 7788 ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, April 29, 1992, at the hour of 12:40 A.M. to the Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, May 12, 1992 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. f' �I Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 04-28-92 Page 7789 ' FINANCE--SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/30/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PAGE 0001 DATE 05/04/92-, PO 5/04/92-,PO # CHK # 1:1 AMOUNT AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP -:-J R 21ST STREET RESTAURANT-- 04634 001-210-0000-2110 04829 - • $250.00 30080 04437 40642 TEMPORARY BANNER REFUND 30080 04/23/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/30/92 i *** VENDOR TOTAL********************ir******************ager**ir********frn********at**ir** R A-1 COAST -RENTALS MISC CHARGES/APR 92 $250. 00 - 00029 - • 305-400-8144-4309 00001 $238.25 04/30/92 CIP 90-144 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL•*******•*************************.*********************************** R ADAMSON INDUSTRIES MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 92 $238. 25 00138 --001-400-2101-4309 00503 - --- $227.48 - 5273 03/31/92 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS - • RADIO REPLACEMENT/POLICE 52428 $227.48 • 00935 -- - 001-400-2101-4307 -- 00319 - - --.- $173.90 • 04/22/92 POLICE /RADIO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL *•******************************************.* -*4****.*************** R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 $173. 90 -00857-- 001-400-2101-4306.- 01167 - - • $23.45 04/30/92 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R APOLLO LEASING COMPANY LTD. LEASE PMT/MAY 1992 -1969 —02558-- -- -001-400-3104-6900 - 00094 04/30/92- $23. 45 $855. 11 TRAFFIC SAFETY /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ASPLUNDH SHARPEN CHIPPER BLADES R ASPLUNDH SHARPEN CHIPPER BLADES $855.11 00041 40643 $0. 00 04/30/92 5273 00033 40644 $0.00 04/30/42 J 52428 04167 - -40645- $173.90 04/30/92 H: 00045 -- 40646 $0. 00 04/30/92 !,.• 88-1969 00066 --- 40647 - $0.00 04/30/92 00487 - 001-400-3101-4309 00132-- -. --• $16.50 • -75986 04819 -- 40648 75986 04/02/92 MEDIANS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 04/30/92 00497 001-400-6101-4309 75986 04/02/92 PARKS 01236 $16. 50 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS .*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY, INC. GARAGE DOOR REP/CTY YARD 10233 $33.00 01889 001-400-3103-4309 01352 $297.69 04/21/92 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 75986 04819 40648 $0. 00 04/"30/92 010233 04832 40649 $297.69 04/30/92 h i FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY,..INC. GARAGE DOOR REP/CTY YARD 10233 R BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY, INC. GARAGE DOOR REP/CTY YARD 10233 R BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY. INC._ GARAGE DOOR REP/CTY YARD 10233 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DE=MAND LIST 4. _......._.. FOR 04/30/92-- _....-.---- VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT . DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF . 01889 _ . 001-400-3104-4309 00882 . $297.69 • 04/21/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01889 - 105-400-2601-4309 00808 04/21/92 $297. 69 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01859__. 160-400-3102-4309 00692 . .- $297.68 04/21/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA - CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 $1, 190. 75 -- 01308 .. -001-400-1212-4188 02371 $65.61 04/30/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01308 145-400-3401-4188 01288 $0.35 04/30/92 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS __01308 ._ ..... -.145-400-3402-4188 -- 01274 --- . - $0.14 04/30/92 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS #4* VENDOR TOTAL****#************************************************#************** R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED -- CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 *66.10 01293 _. 001-400-1212-4188 02373 - $17,760.38 04/30/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01293 110-400-3302-4188 01539 04/30/92 PARKING ENF $529. 31 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -01293 --145-400-3403-4188 00452 $15.72 04/30/92 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -01293- - -160-400-3102-4188 01253 $81.84 04/30/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01293 170-400-2103-4188 00263 $264.12 04/30/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01293 705-400-1217-4158 00622 $141.51 04/30/92 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL*#****************************************************************** R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. MEDIAN MAINT/MARCH 92 $18,792.88 00599 001-400-3101-4201 00108 $3,800.00 03/31/92 MEDIANS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT PAGE 0002 DATE 05/04/92- I ) 5/04/92I) PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 010233 04832 40649- $297.69 04/30/92 010233 04832 40649 $297. 69 04/30/92 010233 04832 40649 $297.68 04/30/92 00055 40650 $0.00 04/30/92 00055 40650 $0.00 04/30/92 00055 40650-- $0.00 0650---- $0.00 04/30/92 00056 40651 $0. 00 04/30/92 00056 40651 $0.00 04/30/92 00056 40651 -- $0. 00 04/30/92 ' 00056 --40651 $0.00 04/30/92 J I, „i ;• • w r • 00056 -40651- $0.00 04/30/92 • 4 00056 40651 $0.00 04/30/92 00044 40652 $0.00 04/30/92 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/30/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # • -ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN - CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN - CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN -- CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN - CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 00238 001-400-1212-4188 02368 04/30/92 EMP BENEFITS 00238 ------105-400-2601-4168 01275 04/30/92 STREET LIGHTING 00238 109-400-3301-4188 00263 04/30/92 VEH PKG DIST - 00238 110-400-3302-4188 01535 04/30/92 PARKING ENF 00238 145-400-3401-4188 01285 04/30/92 DIAL A RIDE 00238 ---145-400-3402-4188---01271 04/30/92 ESEA 00238 -- 145-400-3403-4188 00450 04/30/92 BUS PASS SUBSDY R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN -----------00238 - CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN ------ CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R •CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92' R - CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN -- CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 *** VENDOR TOTAL *************** 04/30/92 145-400-3408-4188 -- 00091 -- COMMUTER %PRESS 00238 - -155-400-2102-4188 00790 04/30/92 CROSSING GUARD 00238 ----160-400-3102-4188 01249 04/30/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN 00238 170-400-2103-4188 00259 04/30/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS - 00238 705-400-1209-4188 00558- 04/30/92 LIABILITY INS 00238 • 705-400-1217-4188 00619 04/30/92 WORKERS COMP PAGE 0003 DATE 05/04/92Th INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $3,800.00 • $859.07 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $29.61 • /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2.65 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $126.40 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $4.25 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.44 - /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.53 /EMPLOYEE_ BENEFITS - $0.26 -- /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.77 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $22.54 - /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $3.48 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $4.42 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $16.63 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *********a******************************************* .._ .. .... $1,072.05-- CA 1,072.05-- CA STATE UNIV DOMINGUEZ HILLS 00412 001-400-1202-4316 00416 $516.00 FALL TUITION/V. MOHLER -3321 04/30/92 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING 0004140653- $0.00 04/30/92 :I 00041 -40653 $0.00 04/30/92 00041 40653 $0.00 04/30/92 00041 •••40653- $0.00 04/30/92 00041 40653 $0.00 04/30/92 00041 -40653-- $0.00 04/30/92 00041 40653 $0.00 04/30/92 00041 - 40653 $0.00 04/30/92 00041 40653 $0.00 04/30/92 00041- ---- 40653 - $0.00 04/30/92 00041 40653 $0.00 04/30/92 00041- -- -40653-- i $0.00 04/30/92 !• I 00041 40653 $0.00 04/30/92 567-74-3321 04715 40654 $0.00 04/30/92 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LEMAND LIST -.. - FOR .04/30/92 -------- ----- VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0004 1- - ....--_. _.. DATE 05/04/92.r INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL***********•*****************************.***************************---_..._._.-_ .$516.00 R CAL STATE UNIV/DOMINGUEZ HILLS - FALL TUIT/S. LAWRENCE 03358 --- - 001-400-1207-4316 00098- . - - - • $516. 00 04/27/92 BUS LICENSE_ /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R R R *** R R R .R R R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE ....-_ WATER BILLS/APRIL 92 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE -.. WATER BILLS/APRIL 92 CALIFORNIA WATER. SERVICE WATER BILLS/APRIL 92 00016 .--- 001-400-3101-4303 04/30/92 MEDIANS 00202 $516. 00 $442.35 /UTILITIES 00016 -- -001-400-4204-4303. 00551 $305.72 04/30/92 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES 00016 001-400-6101-4303 04/30/92 PARKS 00425 - $946.14 /UTILITIES VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE REP HYDRANT/PALM & 19TH 501-1 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE REP HYDRANT/26TH ST 505-1 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE REP HYDRANT/PALM & 24TH 503-1 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE REPLACE HYDRANT/21ST-ARD 502-1 00671.--- -180-400-2202-4201 00066 04/24/92 HYDRANT UPGRADE 00671 .. -180-400-2202-4201.- 00067- 04/24/92 HYDRANT UPGRADE 00671 180-400-2202-4201 00068 04/24/92 HYDRANT UPGRADE 00671-- .. ---._.180-400-2202-4201 -- 00069 04/24/92 • HYDRANT UPGRADE -$1.694.21 J 04307 - -40655 $0.00 04/30/92 • 00411 40656 $0.00 04/30/92 00411 40656 $0.00 04/30/92 ... 1,1 $0.00 04/30/92 00411 40656 $8.170.40 4501-1 03407 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $8,326.00 40657 - 04/30/92 *6.787.48 4505-1 03412 - 40657 -- /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $7.384.00 04/30/92 $3.742.00 4503-1 03406 - 40657 - /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *7,620.00 04/30/92 $8.069.60 4502-1 03408 -40657 - /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR.IVAT $8.382.00 04/30/92 VENDOR TOTAL*******************•************************************************* .. CANADA LIFE 00046 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 04/30/92 CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 001-400-1212-4188 02378 - EMP BENEFITS -- 00046 - -170-400-2103-4188 00264 04/30/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS *26.769.48 • $638.55 - /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $96.75 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL.********************************************************************._ R CENTER FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE TUITIONS. ENDOM 03027 -. 001-400-2101-4312 04/30/92 POLICE $735.30 -- 01928 -- 01928 $195.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE POST ,I 00008 - --- 40658- • - $0.00 04/30/92 1..• 00008 - 40658 $0.00 04/30/92 04533 $0.00 40659 04/30/92 v • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CATTY OF HERMOSA BEACH DE=MAND LIST FOR 04/30/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************.k**********************4*** ..._..-- R CENTINELA SO. BAY VISA ANNUAL FEE/CTY MANAGER R CENTINELA SO. BAY VISA MAR EXP/S. WISNIEWSKI 03353 - 001-400-1201-4305 00220 04/13/92 PAGE 0005 DATE 05/04/92 INV/REF PO 44 CHI+( # ' $195. 00 $8.00 CITY MANAGER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 03353 001-400-1201-4317 00274 04/13/92 • $251.32 CITY MANAGER /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 - $259. 32 - 00014 - -001-400-2101-4311 01406 • • -3368.59 04/30/92 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CHEVRON USA, INC.- MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 $368.59 - 00634- . 170-400-2103-4310 00052 --- - -- $633.43 -- 04/30/92 SPEC INVESTOTNS /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R - COAST GLASS COMPANY MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92 $633.43 - --- 00325--- - 001-400-4204-4309 02321 $36.91 03/31/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R EASTMAN, INC. MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 $36. 91 02514 001-400-1208-4305 01066 --- -$433.04 - -- 04/30/92 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R EL CAMINO COLLEGE-- TUITION/9 OFFICERS 3433. 04 01469 . .. - 001-400-2101-4312 -01929 01929 - --- - $45.00 04/30/92 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE POST *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $45. 00 R -ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY.- -=---- 02354 ' - 001-400-3103-6900 00104 $1.736.78 LEASE PMT/MAY 1992 3080 04/23/92 ST MAINTENANCE /LEASE PAYMENTS AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP Wyly • 02146 40660 $0.00 04/30/92 • 02147 40660 $0.00 04/30/92 00413 40661- 30.00 04/30/92 -Jr 00415 -40662-- $0. 00 04/30/92 00316 - 40663 $0.00 04/30/92 • • 00424 -- -40664 --- $0.00 04/30/92 1,. 04540 - -- 40665 - - $0.00 04/30/92 -3080 00043 --- ---40666--- $0.00 04/30/92 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/30/92-.--- VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0006 DATE 05/04/92T-1.. INV/REF PO # CHR # *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************_..._ .. $1,736.78 R VIRGINIA*ELLEDGE PER DIEM ADVANCE 03797 001-400-2101-4316 TR401 04/30/92 POLICE 00890 $40.25 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************•************************************************** R STEVE*ENDOM MEALS/P. O. S. T. CLASS 01034 001-400-2101-4312 04/30/92 POLICE *40.25 01927 *28.50 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************* R GANDALF DATA, INC. MODEM MAINT/NPR-JUN 92 *28.50 01432 001-400-1206-4201 00980 *546.00 3585 04/01/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******•**************************************************************._.. R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE.-.... CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE_..._.___. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R. .GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE - CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R - GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE _--..-.-- CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE - CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R _.. GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE ---..- CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 *546.00 04397 001-400-1212-4188 02370 *359.20 04/30/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04397..-.-----105-400-2601-4188 01277 .- . -4*23.45 04/30/92 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -. 04397 .- 109-400-3301-4188 00265 $2.10 04/30/92 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE_ BENEFITS .04397- --- -. -.-110-400-3302-4188 -.01537 .01537-. . - - $107.10 04/30/92 . PARKING ENF 04397 145-400-3401-4188 01287 04/30/92 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *3.36 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04397 --.- -145-400-3402-4188 - - 01273 --- • • *0.22 - 04/30/92 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 04397 • 145-400-3408-4188 00093 $0.14 04/30/92 COMMUTER XPRESS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -04397 04397 ------- 155-400-2102-4188 • 00792 - - - -- - $1.40 04/30/92 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP TR401 00401 40667 $0.00 04/30/92 04532 40668 $0.00 04/30/92 3585 00018 40669 , 1• J • • • $0.00 04/30/92 1 00028 40670 $0.00 04/30/92 j •I 00028 .40670 -- $0.00 04/30/92 i 00028 40670 $0.00 04/30/92 .: 00028 - 40670 - $0. 00 04/30/92, 00028 -. 40670 $0.00 04/30/921 00028 . .. _..40670--- $0. 00 04/30/92 I- I.• 00028 40670 - $0.00 04/30/92 00028 - --40670- $0.00 04/30/92 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE -- CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE• CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST --FOR 04/30/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE-INVC PRQJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION -04397 -- 160-400-3102-4188-- 01251 --- $18.69 ' 04/30/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04397 170-400-2103-4188 00261 04/30/92 $26.25 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04397 - 705-400-1209-4188 00559 $2.80 04/30/92 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 04397 705-400-1217-4188 00620 $3.50 04/30/92 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL *** *************area ** ********cwt***** *****************ate ******eta * - _. R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/APRIL 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/APRIL 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED - TELE CHARGES/APRIL 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED ---------- TELE CHARGES/APRIL 92 41* R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/APRIL 92 PAGE 0007 DATE 05/04/92 - i1 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT Ut1ENC DATE EXP -- - $548.21 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00456 $10.00 04/30/92 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE -00015 -- 001-400-1121-4304 --00507-- $28.93 04/30/92 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE -00015----001-400-1131-4304 - 00366 - - -$12.79- 04/30/92 $12.79-- 04/30/92 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 00015 -- --001-400-1141-4304 00522---- $25.00.---- 04/30/92 25.00 ----- 04/30/92 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE -00015 - 001-400-1201-4304 00561 $21.53 04/30/92 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHQNE R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED ---- - 00015 -- TELE CHARGES/APRIL 92 04/30/92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED - TELE CHARGES/APRIL 92 aOr R -- GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED -- TELE CHARGES/APRIL 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/APRIL 92 R --- GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/APRIL 92 .10 -'I • 001-400-1202-4304- 00577 $81.64 - FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00.581 -- $54.97 - 04/30/92 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 00015 -- 001-400-1206-4304 00480 -$262.-50 04/30/92 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00386 -$26.44 04/30/92 BUS LICENSE_ /TELEPHONE 00015.------ 001-400-1208-4304 • 00209 $13.15 04/30/92 GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE .I I 00028 40670 --- $0.00 04/30/92 1 I41' 00028 40670 $0.00 04/30/92 00028 40670 $0.00 04/30/92 00028 40670 $0.00 04/30/92 00430 40672 $0.00 04/30/92 00430 - - -40672-- $0.00 40672--- 30.00 04/30/92 00430 40672 - $0. 00 04/30/92 00430 -40672 - $0.00 04/30/92 00430 - 40672- $0.00 04/30/92 00430 • -40672 - $0.00 04/30/92 00430 - 40672-- $0.00 0672-- $0.00 04/30/92 00430 40672 $0.00 04/30/92 00430 40672 $0.00 04/30/92 00430 .... -40672---. $0.00 -.40672- - $0.00 04/30/92 .•I FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCR IPTION R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/APR R. GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/APR INCORPORATED- CVY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND IAND LIST FOR 04/30/92 -- - VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 ____ ...001-400-2101-4304 - 01017 ._ -_._ $1,268.25 IL 92 04/30/92 POLICE /TELEPHONE INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2201-4304 IL 92 04/30/92 FIRE INCORPORATED 00431 $191.63 /TELEPHONE _00015 001-400-2401-4304 00448 IL 92 04/30/92 ANIMAL CONTROL INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00581 IL 92 04/30/92 PLANNING INCORPORATED - $39.25 /TELEPHONE $86.38 /TELEPHONE .00015 001-400-4201-4304 00522 .-. . $137.75 /TELEPHONE IL 92 04/30/92 BUILDING INCORPORATED IL 92 INCORPORATED IL 92 INCORPORATED IL 92 INCORPORATED__ 00015 04/30/92 001-400-4202-4304 00609 $457.55 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE PAGE 0008 DATE 05/04/92,1 via 'l • INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP _ 00015.. .-001-400-4204-4321 00648 --- 3103.84 04/30/92 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT 00015 04/30/92 001-400-4601-4304 00674 $157.29 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE -00015 .- -- -001-400-6101-4304 --- 00406 --- - - $12.79 IL 92 04/30/92 PARKS INCORPORATED 00015 109-400-3301-4304 00048 IL 92 04/30/92 VEH PKG DIST INCORPORATED-.. /TELEPHONE $10.00 /TELEPHONE 00015 .--..-- - 110-400-3302-4304 00583 - -- $293.41 /TELEPHONE IL 92 04/30/92 - PARKING ENF INCORPORATED 00015- --145-400-3401-4304 00112 IL 92 04/30/92 DIAL A RIDE $4.16 /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** - - R GTEL EQUIPMENT RENT/APR 92 -$3,299.25 - 01340 -. -001-400-2101-4304 01016 $51.56 04/22/92 POLICE /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL *************-* *************************************************** . R GUARDIAN DENTAL --$51.56-- 02623 001-400-1212-4188 02379 $3,024.11 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 04/30/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00430 40672-- $0.00 04/30/92"H, 1" 00430 40672 $0.00 04/30/92 00430 40672 $0.00 04/30/92 00430 40672 $0.00 04/30/921. 00430 40672 $0.00 04/30/92 ,.'r 00430 40672 $0.00 04/30/421 00430 .40672 - $0.00 04/30/921 00430 40672 $0.00 04/30/921H 00430 -- 40672-- I, $0.00 04/30/92 j•,. i , 00430 40672 $0.00 04/30/92 00430 40672 .._.._ . $0.00 04/30/92 00430 40672 $0.00 04/30/92 1 • I- I� 1. 00433 40673 $0.00 04/30/92H - 00001 40674,--•1-1 $0.00 04/30/92 .o 1 I FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/30/92, VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION -02623 -. 04/30/92 02623 04/30/92 02623 04/30/92 105-400-2601-4188 01280 STREET LIGHTING 110-400-3302-4188 01541 PARKING ENF .145-400-3401-4188 01292 DIAL A RIDE 02623 145-400-3402-4188 01278 04/30/92 ESEA 02623 -160-400-3102-4188 01256 04/30/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN 02623 170-400-2103-4188 00265 04/30/92 02623 - 04/30/92 02623 -- 04/30/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS 705-400-1209-4188 00563 LIABILITY INS 705-400-1217-4188 00625 WORKERS COMP $2.63 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $105.36 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.32 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.53 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $19.39 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $26.34 /EMPLOYEE_ BENEFITS $33.52 - /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - $50.28 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL***#*##***-ntr-n**##*##*-u**-n***a-x*#-a-#**#***#*****##*-»#**tr-n**-n**#*#***** - R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 00241 001-400-1212-4188 02372 04/30/92 EMP BENEFITS ----- 00241-- --105-400-2601-4188 01278 04/30/92 STREET LIGHTING -00241 -. -109-400-3301-4188 00266 04/30/92 VEH PKG DIST -00241 -- -110-400-3302-4188 01538 04/30/92 PARKING ENF • 00241 145-400-3401-4188 01289 04/30/92 DIAL A RIDE - -- 00241- - ---- 145-400-3402-4188 • 01275 ' 04/30/92 ESEA PAGE 0009 - DATE 05/04/92 INV/REF PO # CHV # 11 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 6I I r - $3,263.48 $16,745.22 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - $830.09 - /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $62.89 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2,247.51 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS • $60.37 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $6.29 .. /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00001 $0.00 40674 04/30/92 00001 40674 $0.00 04/30/92 00001 40674 - 30.00 04/30/92 00001 40674 $0.00 04/30/92 00001 40674 - $0. 00 04/30/92 '. 00001 40674 $0.00 04/30/92 00001 - - 40674 -- $0.00 04/30/92 00001 40674 $0.00 04/30/92 L 00016 -40675 $0.00 04/30/92 00016 ---40675 -- 30.00 04/30/92 00016 --40675 - $0.00 04/30/92 00016 -40675-- - 0675--- $0.00 04/30/92 00016 40675 $0.00 04/30/92 - 00016 - 40675 $0.00 04/30/92 • •I FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH .ELMAND LIST FOR 04/30/92 VND ## ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN ## AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ ## ACCOUNT DESCRIPTIOP1 00241 04/30/92 145-400-3408-4188 00094 COMMUTER XPRESS 00241 155-400-2102-4188 00793 04/30/92 CROSSING GUARD 00241 .. _.-160-400-3102-4188 01252 04/30/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN 00241 170-400-2103-4188 00262 04/30/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS 00241 705-400-1209-4188 00560 04/30/92 LIABILITY INS 00241 705-400-1217-4188 00621 04/30/92 WORKERS COMP $3.77 • /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $50.31 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - $503.09 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $781.43 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $153.92 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $179.07 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PAGE 0010 DATE 05/04/92 INV/REF PO ## CHK ## AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP -** VENDOR TOTAL **************************** ************-****** **** s******** ►***** .. . $21,623.96 R HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92 HERMOSA CAR WASH .... MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92 R HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92 R HERMOSA CAR. WASH MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92 00065 001-400-2101-4311 01407 0615 03/31/92 POLICE 00065----. 001-400-4201-4311 00284 0615 03/31/92 BUILDING 00065 001-400-4202-4311 00213 0615 03/31/92 PUB WKS ADMIN $76.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE - $8.00- /AUTO 8.00-/AUTO MAINTENANCE $8.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE - ----00065 — -. 170-400-2103-4311 - 00038 -- - - -- 0615 03/31/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /AUTO *** VENDOR TOTAL at*ar*atat*-»***arat*arat****ar***nor*au*n*•a*ar********un#*arnx***ar**ar*#r*prat*a►a►** R HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY LOTUS SYS DISK/FINANCE 84546 - - $4.00 MAINTENANCE *96.00 O0016 40675 10.00 04/30/92 00016 40675 10.00 04/30/92 00016 40675 10.00 04/30/92 00016 40675 $0.00 04/30/92 . 00016 40675 10.00 04/30/92 • 00016 40675 10.00 04/30/92 0615 00336 40676-.. 10. 00 04/30/92 0615 00336 .40676 -- $0. 00 04/30/92 0613 00336 40676 10:00 04/30/92 0615 00336 -40676 10.00 04/30/92 00403 ------001-400-1202-4305 00433 145.47 -10884546 04710 04/06/92 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 10.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** -.R HOLLYWOOD BOWL COMM RESOURCES TRIP $45.47 -04642-------001-400-4601-4201 - 01361 • $620.00 • - - 04/30/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT -- 40677-- 04/30/92 04931 40678 • - $0. 00 04/30/92 G FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/30/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************************. ***************** ******** -. R HOZIES RADIATOR SERVICE DUMP TRUCK REP/PUB WKS 94011 00277 001-400-3101-4311 00041 04/16/92 MEDIANS PAGE 0011 DATE 05/04/92 I .• INV/REF PO # CHK # i. AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $620.00 $56.02 /AUTO MAINTENANCE #** VENDOR TOTAL ***************************************************************** R HPDUG DUES/STURGES/MORGAN $56.02 03272 001-400-1206-4315 00074 $25.00 04/20/92 DATA PROCESSING /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************** r******** R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC DISCOUNT OFFERED R - INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC ---- DISCOUNT TAKEN R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC---- MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 02458 001-202-0000-2021 00195 04/30/92 02458 --- - 001-202-0000-2022 ------ 00191 04/30/92 02458 - 001-400-3104-4309 00881 04/30/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY —02458- 001-400-4204-4309 - 02320-- 04/30/92 BLDG MAINT 02458 105-400-2601-4309 00807 04/30/92 STREET LIGHTING $25.00 $11.14 DISCOUNTS OFFERED -- $11. 14CR /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $35.01 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -... ..-- $189.65 . - --- /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $190.23 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL*********it*#****•n#*#**##***#*u•n**#**•u*****#*****#**#:u**#*#**#*#****#_ R .J C PAPER COPIER PAPER $414.89 94011 04830 40679 $56.02 04/30/92 04005 40680 $0.00 04/30/92 • Is 00437 40681 $0.00 04/30/92 00437 - 40681-- $0.00 0681- -$0.00 04/30/92 ;,.i • 00437 40681 $0.00 04/30/92 00437 - - $0. 00 J •40681---, 04/30/92 !.. 9 00437 40681 $0.00 04/30/92 03083 001-400-1208-4305 01067 $779.40 80422170 04708 40682 - 22170 04/08/92 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $779.40 04/30/92 LI *asps VENDOR TOTAL ***#*****a**********ernes*****eraser*****k*******************************-...... R S. BARBARA*JANUS SPRING TRIP REFUND • 04640 001-400-4601-4201 01359 36474 04/30/92 COMM RESOURCES $779.40 $18.00 36474 04918 40683 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/30/92 i. j J *** VENDOR TOTAL ##asar n*;ru*ar+r*et+Fi►*x*uara*#uar3►#•n**it*ataf+F•u. •n•**at**** u p•*-etafi►-a*arat***-a#ata**ar u*u R G*JUNKIN ANIMAL TRAP REFUND - 04637 001-210-0000-2110 37911 04/23/92 -- $18.00 04832 $50.00 37911 04440 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 40684 04/30/92 ,1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE ' 0012 TIME 09: 18:25. FOR 04/30/92------ DATE 05/04/92 I.- PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REEF PO # CHK # I3 DESCRIPTION _. DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL **************************************************** ***** ********* _ $50. 00 SIJ 'I R KATHLEEN R.*LACEY 04641 001-300-0000-3826 03665 $65.00 33053 04921 40685 SPRING PROGRAM REFUND 33053 04/30/92 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES $0.00 04/30/921 *41* VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************-*********************** . ..- .. $65. 00 R LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. 04303 . 001-400-6101-4201 00274 $7,685.50 00073 40686 PARKS MAINT/MARCH 92 03/31/92 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR.IVAT $0.00 04/30/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************.- $7,685.50 R LIVINGSTON—GRAHAM .-.. .. 00387 - 001-202-0000-2021 00197 $10.87 00439 40687 DISCOUNT OFFERED 04/30/92 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 04/30/92 R .. LIVINGSTON—GRAHAM DISCOUNT TAKEN —00387- 001-202-0000-2022 — 00193 - _-- - --- $10. 87CR 00439 --- 40687- 04/30/92 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 04/30/92 R LIVINGSTON—GRAHAM .-----.-----.-----.-..---...--.. 00387.-- 001-400-3103-4309 01350 $614.97 00439 40667 MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 04/30/92 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 04/30/921 *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************41******************.... _. ---$614-97- c-; -$614. 97- R LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. - - 00079 001-400-2201-4309 01301 $32.47 887808 00342 40683 MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92 87608 03/31/92 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 04/30/92 *** VENDOR .TOTAL *******************************************************************. $32. 47 R MAC WAREHOUSE ___03810 - 001-400-2101-4305 01762 $121.33 A2791937 00443 -40689-- MISC. CHARGES/APRIL 92 91937 04/30/92 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 04/30/921: I *** VENDOR TOTAL ***1****tit***41**41st************************************************** $121.33- MANHATTAN 121.33- MANHATTAN FORD 00605 001-400-2101-4311 01408 $116.00 MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 04/30/92 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL **************-*************************************** ************** -- -$116.00 00446 40690 $0. 00 04/30/92 R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. -. - 03080 001-141-0000-1401 00176 $4,237.88 - 920215 04841 - 40691 UNLEADED/DIESEL FUEL 20215 04/30/92 /GASOLINE INVENTORY $0.00 04/30/92 C*.TTY OF HERMOSA BEACH F IMANC E -SF A340 DEMAND LIST TIME_ 09:18:25 FOR 04/30/92 PAGE ' 0013 1. DATE 05/04/92 i, PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION - DATE INVC -. PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** - --- $4,237.88 R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION 00388 170-400-2103-4310 00051 $12.50 00350 40692 MISC. CHARGES/MARCH 92 03/31/92 SPEC INVF_STGTNS /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************************.*************--_..--._..- $12.50 $0.00 04/30/92 ., l' !I R MONARCH BROOM 00084 --- 001-400-3103-4309 01351 $497.95 00449 40693 - MISC CHARGES/APR 92 04/30/92 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 04/30/92 .' *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************u-**************n******************** - $497.95 R MYERS STEVENS & COMPANY 00091 001-400-1212-4188 02376 $772.20 00013 40694 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 04/30/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 04/30/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************-.... - $772. 20 R NATIONAL HOME LIFE- 03465 - ---001-400-1212-4188 02375 $80.00 00065 40695 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 04/30/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R NATOA PUBLICATIONS/BLDG $80.00 $0.00 04/30/92 03384 001-400-4201-4305 00760 $80.00 P01820 04211 40696 01820 04/17/92 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $80.00 04/30/92 6 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************..- - .--- 380.00 R PACTEL CELLULAR - LA ---------- 03209 170-400-2103-4304 00046 $1,643.49 00453 40697 MOBILE PHONE CHGS/APR 92 04/30/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /TELEPHONE $0.00 04/30/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************...... $1,643.49 R PAK WEST 00519 001-400-4204-4309 02322 39.92 MISC. CHARGES/MAR 92 03/31/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************-..._.... $9.92 00354 40698 $0.00 04/30/92 ;! R MARTHA*PEREZ 04638 --- 001-210-0000-2110 04833 $250.00 36460 04441 ---40699 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 36460 04/23/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/30/92 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/30/92 VND 4* ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN it AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ 4* ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL_******************************************************************** R POSTMASTER POSTAGE/SPRING BROCHURE PAGE 0014 DATE 05/04/92— INV/REF 5/04/92.-. INV/REF FO 4L CHK i0 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $250.00 00097 001-400-4601-4305 01050 $1,200.00 04/30/92 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ** VENDOR TOTAL *********************************-****•****************************** R THE*PRECINCT PATROL CAR SET-UP/EQUIP 91285 $1,200.00 04370..--. 001-400-2101-5402 00093 .- $11,503.30 04/14/92 POLICE /EQUIP-MOR.E THAN $500 *-x# VENDOR TOTAL**********************•*********************************** **********• R SYLVIA#ROOT SEC SERV/4-7-92 $11,503.30 04061 001-400-4102-4201 00353 $302.00 407 04/10/92 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************iter************************************ ******** _.__..___._ ._. $302.00 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS._... CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS .. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS -. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 .04398 . 001-400-1212-4188 02369 - $991.88 • 04/30/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 .. . __ 105-400-2601-4188 01276- -- - - -. $42. 06 04/30/92 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 109-400-3301-4188 00264 $5.79 04/30/92 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 04/30/92 110-400-3302-4188 -01536 ----- $172. 61 - - PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 145-400-3401-4188 01286 04/30/92 DIAL A RIDE $4.34 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 145-400-3402-4188 - 01272 $0.33 04/30/92 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 145-400-3403-4188 00451 40.65 04/30/92 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 04398 -- 145-400-3408-4188 00092 -- - -$0.33 33 - 04/30/92 COMMUTER XPRESS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04926 40700 $0. 00 04/ 30/92 91265 04173 40701 $0.00 04/30/92 407 01975 40702 40.00 04/30/92 00019 40703 $0.00 04/30/92 ' 00019- -40703 -- $0. 00 04/30/92, 00019 40703 $0.00 04/30/92 00019 -....- 40703 --- $0.00 04/30(92 00019 40703 $0. 00 04/30/92; 00019 40703 40.00 04/30/92 00019 40703 40.00 04/30/92 00019 — 40703 $0.00 04/30/92 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/30/92 - VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT -DATE_ INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 04398 _ ---- 155-400-2102-4188 - --- 00791 54.70 04/30/92 CR(]SSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 160-400-3102-4188 01250 534.61 04/30/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 - 170-400-2103-4188 00260 ----- 543.08 04/30/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PAGE 0015 -• DATE 05/04/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # t' -' AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP - *** VENDOR TOTAL ****•********************************-************* ********** ******* --.. - - 51, 300. 38 R SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT MARRIOTT HOTEL ADV/V. ELLEDGE TR401 --04633-- 001-400-2101-4316 00891 • $280.50 04/30/92 POLICE /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************•************ R STEVE*SLOVICK - V—BALL TOURNEY REFUND 5280. 50 04643 001-300-0000-3826 _ 03866 520.00 _ .-.- ._.. ....- 04/30/92 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************•****************************************** R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR.- BUS PASS SALES/MAR 92 60003 R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. BUS PASS SALES/FEB 92 59966 00843 ---- - 145-400-3403-4251 - -- 00125 04/06/92 BUS PASS SUBSDY 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00126 04/06/92 BUS PASS SUBSDY - -520. 00 • 51, 373. 00 - /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 51,264.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************-u»-u-n-**•n*****•»*******•n*-n******-»•b-********** -- - -- -52,637.00 R SO. CAL SHARPSHOOTER, INC. PRACTICE SHOOTS/NOV—MAR --02250 001-400-2101-4201 01012 03/31/92 POLICE 53, 520. 30 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR.IVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL•************************************-»***-nor***********************u** R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 00113 001-400-2201-4309 04/30/92 FIRE 53, 520. 30 01300 217.32 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00113 001-400-4204-4321 00649 229.77 04/30/92 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT 00019 40703 -' 20.00 04/30/92 I• 00019 40703 50.00 04/30/92 00019 - 40703 20.00 04/30/92 TR401 00401 -40704 20.00 04/30/92 04928 ._ .._. 40705 ...... 50.00 04/30/92 60003 03382 -- 40706 -- 20.00 04/30/92 59966 03381 40706 50.00 04/30/92 00368 -40707 20.00 04/30/92 ' 00463 40708 $0.00 04/30/92 i, • 00463 40708 • $0.00 04/30/92 '• • -141. O FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CATTY OF HERMOSA BEACH I;I:MAND LIST �.... FOR 04/30/92 ---_._....._ VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PRQJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** ._. R. SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT. CITATIQN COURT BAIL PAGE 0016 DATE 05/04/92, INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP - $47.09 00400 110-300-0000-3302 45264 4396.00 04/23/92 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************* R SOUTH BAY NOTICING AND MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 R SOUTH BAY NOTICING AND MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 03882 ... 001-400-1121-4323 00191 04/30/92 CITY CLERK -. 03882 001-400-4601-4201 01358 04/30/92 COMM RESOURCES - .4396.00 $115.00 /PUBLIC NOTICING $230.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ... SOUTH BAY WELDERS... MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 4345.00 00018.. -160-400-3102-4309 00691.- .. -- 467.26. - 04/30/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R R R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.-___ ELECTRIC BILLS/APR 92 R R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA E_DISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/APR 92 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON.. C0. ELECTRIC BILLS/APR 92 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. - ELECTRIC BILLS/APR 92 -00159.. _ --001-400-3104-4303 .. 00110 04/30/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00552 04/30/92 BLDG MAINT --.00159-.__.- 001-400-6101-4303. 00426 04/30/92 PARKS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 ELECTRIC BILLS/APR 92 04/30/92 105-400-2601-4303 00353 STREET LIGHTING 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00192 04/30/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN $67.26 -.4486.80 /UTILITIES *3,526.41 /UTILITIES - -- $901.17 /UTILITIES *148.40 /UTILITIES $22.60 /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL**************•****************************************************** 35,085.38 .R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS -CO, - ---------00170 --- GAS BILLINGS/APR 92 04/30/92 001-400-4204-4303 00553 --- - $285.00 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES 03386 40709 40.00 04/30/92 00464 40710 30. 00 04/30/92i J I .10 00464 40710 . 40.00 04/30/92 00465 40711 30. 00 04/30/92 '4: 00466 - 40712 - 40.00 04/30/92 00466 40712 $0.00 04/30/92 00466 .40712 30. 00 04/30/92 '• 00466 40712 40.00 04/30/92 00466 -40712 $0.00 04/30/92,H 00467 ---40713---- $0. 00 04/30/92 ;•• FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/30/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION **' VENDOR TOTAL:n********#**#**#**x**tr*##**##****#n************#u****u*****un#*r***a R STATE OF CALIFORNIA FINGERPRINT APPS/MAR 92 06494 00364 001-400-2101-4251 03/31/92 POLICE PAGE 0017 DATE 05/04/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # - 3285. 00 00438 $108.00 /CONTRACT SERVICF_/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL ********** **************************teat******* ***************star**** R STRAWBERRY PATCH TEMPORARY BANNER REFUND 30773 04636 --. - 04/23/92 3108. 00 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP• 906494 00023 40714 $0.00 04/30/92 001-210-0000-2110 - - 04831--- - - 3250. 00 - 30773 04439 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 >t** VENDOR TOTAL*I***************************************************ar************** R TASERTRON TASERTRON UNITS/POLICE 04249 001-400-2101-5401 1653 04/07/92 POLICE 00072 3250. 00 $1,396.64 /EQUIP—LESS THAN 3500 *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************.*******************************-- R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY DISCOUNT OFFERED R - TODD PIPE & SUPPLY ----- DISCOUNT TAKEN R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 $1,396.64 --00124 001-202-0000-2021--- 00196 - 42.14 04/30/92 DISCOUNTS OFFERED --.00124 001-202-0000-2022 00192 - -- - $2. 14CR 04/30/92 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 00124 001-400-6101-4309 01235 3104.83 04/30/92 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************.*************************** R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL --- CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 00240 001-400-1212-4188 02377 04/30/92 3104. 83 3258. 41 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 145-400-3401-4188 04/30/92 01291 DIAL A RIDE_ 00240 145-400-3402-4188 01277 04/30/92 F_SEA -00240 160-400-3102-4188 01255 04/30/92 31. 14 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 30. 45 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 33. 93 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 40715 04/30/92 1653 04126 40716 14,404.00 04/30/92 00474 40717 — 30.00 04/30/92 to 00474 - -- 40717 30. 00 04/30/92 00474 40717 30.00 04/30/92 1, 00029 40718 $0.00 04/30/92 00029 40718 $0.00 04/30/92 J 00029 40718 $0.00 04/30/92 00029 —40718 30.00 04/30/92 s FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL... CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R TR.ANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/30/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION .00240 . 705-400-1209-4188 .. 00562 04/30/92 $5.08 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS . 00240 705-400-1217-4188 00624 $5.08 04/30/92 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL***************•x*•••**********#***********#*****************•**•**** R TRAVELODGE ... TEMPORARY BANNER REFUND 30205 04639 001-210-0000-2110 04/23/92 PAGE 0018 DATE 05/04/92 I,I INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 3274. 09 00029 40718 $0.00 04/30/92 00029 40718 $0.00 04/30/92 ' , 04834 $250.00 30205 04442 40719 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/30/92 * * VENDOR TOTAL****•****************••**************•****•**•********•***************•***** R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. .. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. - - CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. -- CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 04/30/92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 04/30/92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS.-- -.---03790 - --. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 • 04/30/92 3250. 00 03790 001-400-1212-4188 02374 $2,101.65 04/30/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 -.....105-400-2601-4188 01279 --- - $77.05 04/30/92 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 109-400-3301-4188 00267 39. 00 04/30/92 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 -- -- --- 110-400-3302-41E8- 01540 04/30/92 PARKING ENF 03790 145-400-3401-4188 01290 04/30/92 DIAL A RIDE_ .03790 -145-400-3402-4188 -01276 04/30/92 ESEA 03790 • 145-400-3403-4188 00453 - 3385.23 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 313. 29 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 31.66 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 31. 37 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 . 145-400-3408-4188 - 00095 $0.76 COMMUTER XPRESS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 155-400-2102-4188 00794 $6.00 04/30/92 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 160-400-3102-4188 01254 • $60.60 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00022 40720 30. 00 04/30/92. 00022 40720 30.00 04/30/92 I. 00022 40720 $0.00 04/30/92 00022 - - 40720 --- . 30. 00 04/30/92 1, 00022 40720 30.00 04/30/92 - - 40720 ' 30. 00 04/30/92 ' 00022 40720 ,i $0.00 04/30/92 00022 40720 - $0.00 04/30(92 'i 00022 40720 • 30. 00 04/30/92 • 00022 -- 40720 - I $0.00 04/30/92 ,., FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 09:18:25 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY -INS -- CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 92 CcTTY OF HERMOSA BEACH Ut11AND LIST FOR 04/30/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION —03790 --- -- 705-400-1209-4188 00561 -- ---• -- $18.61 - • 04/30/92 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 705-400-1217-4188 00623 $26.41 04/30/92 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL *********************************•*********************************** _. R DAVID*VANEVENHOVEN SPRING TRIP REFUND 36472 PAGE 0019 DATE 05/04/92i INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP - - $2,701.63 00022 40720 $0.00 04/30/92 00022 40720 $0.00 04/30/92 i , 04342 001-400-4601-4201 01360 $18.00 36472 04919 04/30/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE_/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***************************•***.************•************************* - - R WEST WAY CLEANERS TEMPORARY BANNER REFUND 30107 04635 001-210-0000-2110 04/23/92 $18.00 04830 $250.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************•*******************-....._._.. $250.00 *** R WESTERN ENGRAVING - NAMEPLATES/STAMP/COUNCIL_ 07271 VENDOR TOTAL R DENISE*WHEELER FILM PERMIT REFUND 35515 -02578 -- ---001-400-1101-4305 00423 $38.41 - 04/07/92 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 01627 001-300-0000-3823 04/30/92 $38.41 40721 04/30/92 30107 04438 40722 $0.00 04/30/92 ' 1007271 09400 40723 - $0. GO 04/30/92 H 00128 $172.50 35515 04929 40724 /SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY $0.00 04/30/92 I • *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************- R XEROX. CORPORATION DRY INK FOR COPIER/FIRE 16832 00135 001-400-2201-4305 00559 03/30/92 FIRE - $172. 50 $92.01 146516832 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** — *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $92.01 $141,032.55 • 03448 40725 $92.01 04/30/92! *** TOTAL WARRANTS******************************************************************----- $141,032.55 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAI 4S COVERED BY I. - THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAG TO INCLUSIVE, OF THE ARE ACCURATE, WARRANT REGISTER FOR FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE.. TO THC H DGET. BY FINAN' EEDIREc Ii OR DATE S�! �"/ ! FINANCE-SFA34O -TIME--14:-02: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0001 ,i. 2 ..... .r ... ..r r ..- VfWI C-'VJ/V//-1C PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPT-ION 31 1 ' 6 DATE-INVG PROJ-#------ACCOUNT-DESCRIPTION AMOUNT-UNF_NC--DATE--EXP R A & E TROPHIES 5 6 e 9 02744 001 400-4101 4319--001-31 $197-74 10837-00042----40730 MISC. CHARGES/MAY 92 10837 05/01/92 CITY COUNCIL /SPECIAL EVENTS $0.00 05/07/92 c 1 2 **it- VENDOR -TOTAL --**ter-*** ******** **************--)r#•»ir*** ***** ***** U* r $1971 15 R ADVANCE -ELEVATOR 00003 001-400-4204-4201--00510 490.00 20679 00003-- 40731 ELEVATOR MAINT/MAY 92 28679 05/01/92 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/07/92 "1 s r 18 **ar-VF_NDOR T0TAL--�r***u-o- x**•x•n•*r•tra-tt-x*ir* **ii ***-*qtr+r-�r•tr•niter*-u-11-**ir* **** rtr� i1- 190. -OO O 21 22 L3 ,,, 21 R ADVANCED -ELECTRONIC S 009:35 00I-400 {31 101-4241 01-5 1r59- . 50- 42695 00048 40732— ' RADIO MAINT/POLICE/FIRE 52695 05/01/92 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/07/92 26 2] 2L 23 24 R ADVANCED-ELECTRONfCO 00935 001-400-2241-420E-00300 - 495-00 52695-00040 40732 1-2 RADIO MAINT/POLICE/FIRE 52695 05/01/92 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/07/92 30 31 26 2] R ADVANCED ELECTRONICO, 00935 110-400-3302-4307--00057 $314.00 02569-00050 40732---i RADIO MAINT/MAY 92 52569 04/25/92 PARKING ENF /RADIO MAINTENANCE 40.00 05/07/92 34 35 •**-VENDOR-TOTAL #M#11#it* ******* iHiltil1I***r•*n-****r*►ar 29 0 *****************)1 $2, 100-50 58 39 31 32 3 MER ICAPJ-STYLE F©ODO 60857 pQ1-400-2101-4306— 01-1 4- 4 6050 0930-00045- 3733 4' 41 PRISONER MEALS/APR 92 6930 04/28/92 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 05/07/92 42 43 34 35 35 x**--VENDOR-TOTAL * ****** *****err****************• i***' $68-50 44 (.5 ac 4] R 37 36 39 ARATEX/RED SAAR-INDk1STRIAL 00152 001 400-2201-4309—p4-304 458-40 00017-----40734 UTILITY RAG RENT/APR 92 04/30/92 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 05/07/92 so 51 4053 42 R ARATEXIR.ED-STAR-INDUSTRIA 001520OF-400-3104-4309-00885 -$54.-20 00017 -40734 52 UTILITY RAG RENT/APR 92 04/30/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 05/07/92 54 55 r, R ARATEX7RED-STAR-INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-4204-4309--02326 $21181 4q 45 - 000-17 40734 UTILITY RAG RENT/APR 92 04/30/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 05/07/92 so 5.3 1 46 R ARATEXYR.ED-STAR-INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-4205-4309 00637-- $62-6(00017 6047 40734 UTILITY RAG RENT/APR 92 04/30/92 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 40.00 05/07/92 .� 61 49 R— ARATEX/RED-STAR--INDUSTRIAL 00152--110-400--3302-430900033— $13.43 so 51 00017 40734--;, UTILITY RAG RENT/APR 92 04/30/92 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 05/07/92 ,--s 6] 658z 53 54 69 n711 f1 'k-715 If 0 0 • • • • • • • _< �ar�� ,, s4�ra u:�G+. iN V a, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO • . 2 3 5 B 9 VENDORTOTAL tr************x* a*at#*W**** eu e ' na .********* **********4*******uuax FINANCE-SFA340 TIME -1-4:-02+-49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR -05/07/92 PAGE 0002 DATE --05/07/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE--I-NYC --PROJ--# ACCOUNT -DESCRIPTION AMOUNT -UNENC--DATE-EXP- xx VENDOR TOTALL ****x,zx*****wx.a#*-44** .*** **-*►a► .nra. x..i►nua *-n,nux*n##aaun uat aa►*xnr $.1O0.-4 R BANG ONE -LEASING --99 LEASE PMT/MAY 92 4 2i) 3 4 02154 001-400-4205-6900 001-10— $41-7.96-63 5500566-01-00030 66-01 05/01/92 EQUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 . s . • O . 25 25 27 20 23 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 R OL-IN#BELL SPRING CAMP INSTRUCTOR $417- 96 40735 05/07/92 04277 00-1-400 4601 4201 01366 $560-00 04/16/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT -VENDOR TOTAL- - x * **-***tru ar***r**#* r-*-* *** '+ -»****-is#-4* ** »********-** a ***** m $560-00 04920 40736— $0.00 05/07/92 BL -ACK -TOP MATER-IALG CO. 04352 001-400-3-103-4309---01357 -$127.-30 MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 24081 04/30/92 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS **ti-VENDOR-TO-TA4-*4-a*41*. *****4*tr*tau* *r.1rt►tIA* W**#*il.****t*44F*.**-*#*41-******-**-**-* ar**a+U** $127. 3, 3a 39 41 42 43 . 44 45 46 47 49 • 5° 51 52 53 54 55 . 56 \7 R GARY*BRUTSGH7 CITY TREASURER R R PETTY CASH/4-20 TO 4-27 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY -TREASURE PETTY CASH/4-20 TO 4-27 02016 001--400-2-1-04 4305-04-7&4 $30.02 04/27/92 POLICE R 0201-6 001 400-2101--43/2 0193 04/27/92 POLICE GARY*BRUTSGHT-CITY TREASURE PETTY CASH/4-20 TO 4-27 R O2O46 24081 -00049 40737-- 9 10 11 12 •I7 Inl® 2° 21 22 s -3 24� .:s 26 27 2a 30. 00 05/07/92 30 • 31 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 001--400-24G-1-4316---00894- 03852 0z--400-21 01-4316-00894- 04/27/92 POLICE R GARY*SRU-TECH,- CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/4-20 TO 4-27 $16-00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $23.00 /TRAINING 02016 001-400 2201--4187-0031-1 04/27/92 FIRE R GARY*BRU-T-SCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/4-20 TO 4-27 GARY--*BRUTSCf4,---EITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/4-20 TO 4-27 0385240 738 3, 34 35 35 37 $0.00 05/07/92 Iia 39 03852 40738— $0.00 05/07/92 X67:00 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 02016-----00t-400-4101 4305-00617 $6 (]1- 04/27/92 PLANNING 02016 04/27/92 001-400-4202-4316 00234 PUB WKS ADMIN R GARY*BRUT-SCU, C-ITY-TREASURER 02016 110-400-3302-4310 001-7 PETTY CASH/4-20 TO 4-27 R-ARY*BRUTSCH7-CITY-TREASURER PETTY CASH/4-20 TO 4-27 04/27/92 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $35-00 /TRAINING $400 /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 02016 1-10-400-3302-431-t--00784 $23.81 04/27/92 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE 03852 10738 $0.00 05/07/92 03852 40738— $0.00 05/07/92 03852 10738 $0.00 05/07/92 03852---40738 $0.00 05/07/92 03852 411738 40 0 42 43 • 44 45' 46 4)�® 49 Y3 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 5a 59 6° $0.00 05/07/92 03852 1.0738 $0.00 05/07/92 til 62 0? 64 (.5 67 0 0 0 0 0 68 69 70® 71 72 /3 74 75 FINANCE-SFA340 ---TIME-14: 02.-49 PAY VENDOR NAME - --DESCRIPTION r * x VENDOR TOTAL--**** 10 • 11 12 13 • 14 15 16 • n 1 1e CjTY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1)LMAND LIST FOR 05/07/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE-1NVC PRO.-)--# ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET RENT A CAR -SYSTEMS iN CAR RENTAL/NARCOTICS 03948 04645 04/10/92 PAGE 1 0003 40 DATE -05/07/92 INV/REF PO # . CHK. # AMOUNT-- UNENC ----DATE--EX **** Mnnnnnx $15364 r, z 4 ] 90-400-2103-4201-001-16 587783 1003948-041-77-----40739 SPEC INVF_STGTNS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/07/92 --R BUDGET -RENT --A CAR -SYSTEMS, ---INC 04645- 705-400-1210-4324 00088 $415.68 CAR RENTAL/NARCOTICS 03815 x**-VEf4Dt3R TOTA 191 23 21 22 . 23 24 2s 20 27 211 2, 30 • • 03/27/92 AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS BARBARA*CONK1-IN REIMS TUITION/BOOKS/FEES **-VENDOR TOTA nxxxxxxxn*nx $1-r003.-5 03929-001-400-4202-4318--00235 x466-40 04/29/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING 1003815 -04623 4073 $0.00 05/07/92 ' ***sir***•-* n t n x• a *-1.*******-x*********-A*4***48**•**-*****•I4********* $46674 DIVE -fit` --SURF 4943- 40740 $0.00 05/07/92 0604 001 400 2201-4309--0i-305 $20-00 47394-00421 40741— MISC CHARGES/APR 92 47394 04/30/92 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 05/07/92 -: **-VENDOR-TOTAL_-*******-u**************** r****** rprat*********•ter•****it** ***** .**•*****k* u x 31 UNC AN-INDUSTR-I EC METER REPAIR PARTS 580-0 x **•-VENDOR-TOTAL 40 • 41 42 • • • • 43 44 45 46 4] 44 49 50 51 00122 04/14/92 :0-400-3302-4309 00832 $4797-24 1'006580-0---03373 40742 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $553.22 05/07/92 ***************-R'•**** ***1 ****** **'***•*********#* 4 . $ x n x R— EDDINGS-BROTHERS-AUTO-PARTC DISCOUNT OFFERED DD INGS-BROTHERS-AUTO-PARTS DISCOUNT TAKEN R EDDI-NGS-BROTHERS--AUT-9-PARTS MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 R--EDDINGS-BROTHERS-AUT©-PA MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 EDDINGS-BROTHERS-AUTO-PARTS MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 00165 001-202-0000-2021-0020 04/30/92 001-65 001-202-0000-2022-0019 04/30/92 001-65 001 400-2101-4311 0141 04/30/92 POLICE 479-24 $43. 21 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $43. 21CR- /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $1-r-127.52 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 001-65 001400-3103-431t-00755 $288-22 04/30/92 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-4201-4311---00287 $105.97 04/30/92 BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00427 4074 $0.00 05/07/92 46 00427 40743 $0.00 05/07/92 00427 40743 $0.00 05/07/92 0042 51 52 559 59 40743 6, $0.00 05/07/92 6? 63 00427 40743— $0.00 05/07/92 oo w Gti TO ]t 53 54 •5] • ]4 75 )y, • • 0 • • C • • U • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME -44:02:49 6 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCR IP -T -ION O • 141 R EDDINGS---BROTHERS-AUTO-PARTC MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 R EDDINGS-BROTHERS-AUTO-PART MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 R EDDINGS-BROTHERS-AUTO-PARTS MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 1, EDDINGS-BROTHERS AUTO PARC MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR -05/07/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE-INVC PROD -4t ACCOUNT -DESCRIPTION PAGE 0004 DATE -05/07/92 INV/REF PO # CHK 4$ AMOUNT--UNENC----- DATE--EXP-- 001-65 001-400-4205-4309 -00630 $47--37 ' 04/30/92 • EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00165 001-400-4205-4309 0063? $186,.3 04/30/92 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -00165 001--400-4205-4311--00268 $67.28 04/30/92 EQUIP SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE —00165 001-400-6101-431-1 00282 04/30/92 PARKS EDDINGS-BROTHERS-AUTO- -PARTS MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 R EDDINGS--BROTHERS-AUTO-PAR-TS MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 R EDDINGS-BROTHERS-AUTO-PARTS MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 a 34 • VENDOR-TTOTAL-- 00165 1-10-400-3302-4309-- 00834 04/30/92 PARKING ENF 00165 140 400-3302-4311 00785 04/30/92 PARKING ENF $12. 12 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $28.- 28 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $225. 13 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 001-65 160-400-3-102-4311-00202 04/30/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN ifA A A AA A A 7—W*41- ***AAAAAA $29-6-1 /AUTO MAINTENANCE AAAAAA $2, 117-6' GRATING PACIFIC -ZINC. 04605 -001-202-0000-2021-00204 $2-44 43343 04/27/92 DISCOUNT OFFERED ,3 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 In 4, 40 4L 5, 52 53 56 -00427-- 40743 $0.00 05/07/92 00427 40743 $0.00 05/07/92 00427-------40743 - $0.00 05/07/92 00427-- 40743 $0. 00 05/07/92 00427 40743--- $0.00 05/07/92 00427- /AUTO 0427 $0. 00 -00427 40743 05/07/92 $0.00 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $2-44CR GRATING -PACIFIC, -INC. 04605 001-202-0000-2022 00200 04/27/92 DISCOUNT OFFERED 43343 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN -R---GRATING-RAGTFIC. INC. 04605 160-400-3102 4309 00695- • $485-77 SEWER GRATE REPLACEMENT 43343 04/27/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 41 VENDOR -T3 -TA -n or --A 1-* -A. A r A arir -A•*4i-ii Hvit-w *--IF-* - A **41-*- iii-* A A X GTE -CALIFORNIA: -INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHCS/APR 92 -0200 R GTE-GAE-IF+3RNIA,-INGORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 92 -0200 R-----GTE-CALIFORNIA,-INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 92 -0200 00015-----001-400-1t01-4304 00458 04/01/92 CITY COUNCIL 00015-----001-400-1-421-4304 00509 04/01/92 CITY CLERK 40743 2 4 5 e • • • • ,4. I5 • ,6 0 47-1 22 • z3 • 24 25 26 2, 28 23 30 3, 32 05/07/92 33 34 15 43343--04823 $0.00 43343-04823 $0. 00 40744 05/07/92 4074 05/07/92 10744 05/07/92 -- 4334304823 $488. 21 37 38 33 40 42 44 46 4/ 4H 50 51 $485-77 $7-19 /TELEPHONE $49-50 /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400--1131-4304 00368 $10-27 04/01/92 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 318-0200-00431 40746— $0.00 05/07/92 318 0200-00431 40746-- $0.00 05/07/92 318 0200-00431 10746- $0.00 05/07/92 52 53 • • • • 0 '5475' • 56 53 60 1,2 63 • • 64 •6, • 4 • s • • FINANCE-SFA340 CPf1Y OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST f OR -05/47192 PAGE 0005 12 3 O • PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION 3 6 DATE--4NVC PROd-# —ACCOUNT -DESCRIPTION AMOUNT -UNENC--DATE -EXP • -• 11 --OTC CACI FORN I A. I NC-0RP ©R14TED pOQi 5 ° 6 , A 9 00 i-404- 4141-4304 00524 1-977-50 318-0200 00431--4074- DIRECT DIAL CHCS/APR 92 -0200 04/01/92 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07/92 i0 , 12 R GTE CAE1FOf2Ni/17-1NCORPBRATED OOOtS 001-440 1201-4304 ---0056 1fs-42 31@-0200-x`0431 4474- DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 92 -0200 04/01/92 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07/92 R GTE 14 15 6 t3 ,q 15 CAI_IFORNI-A,-INCORPORATED 00015 001 400-1202-4304— - 40579 $5956 3i@-424040746 40431 DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 92 -0200 04/01/92 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07/92 R ETE EALifORN1A7 1e Z' 6 17DIRECT 1 e If#C6RPQRATE 00-1203-4344-445@4 $24-fs5 31@-4240-40431 40746 2t DIAL CHGS/APR 92 -0200 04/01/92 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07/92 22 23 R OTE-CALIFORNIA—INCORPORATED 00045--001--400-1-206-4304--004@2-- - $29.70 318-0200--00431 40746 24 19 zs 20 DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 92 -0200 04/01/92 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07/92 25 J1 27 JA 22 R GTE -CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 000#5 001-400-1 - 207-4304 00383' -$19.30 318--020000431 40746— DIRECT DIAL CHCS/APR .92 -0200 04/01/92 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07/92 30 24 31 ' TE---OAEIFORNIA—iNCQRPORATED 00415 00t-400-1208 -4304 $10-27 31B-4200-00431 4074- DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 92 -0200 04/01/92 GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07/92 34 - 35 2e GTC CAL-iFQR 49A—INCORPORATED 0001-5 001-400-210-1-4304-01-020 1:392751 318--0200-40431- 40746-";G DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 92 -0200 04/01/92 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07/92 30 29 0 3', TE-CAL-IINCORPORATED �NCQRPORA-TED 00015 001-400-2201-4304-- --4 27 -318-0200-00431 40746-" `'- 31 00433 $10- - 2 DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 92 -0200 04/01/92 FIRE /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07/92 42 33 Ij-- 43 44 4 ft—GTE CAtIFflRhtIA—iNCQRPQRIITED 00015 00i-4 00-240 1-430 4--00 4 50 ii4�O 3i8 -42434}-"0043i 44746 4S 35 DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 92 -0200 04/01/92 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07/92 46 36 4/ 48 GTE-C-AL-1FflRN-1 A) IP•ICORP@RATE$ 3, 00015 001-400 4101-4304- --- -005@3 $4927 318-0200 00001 4474 3e DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 92 -0200 04/01/92 PLANNING /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07/92 50 39 5, 40 GTE -CALIFORNIA— — INCORPORATED 00015-001400-420.1-4304-00524 $79706 318-02_00 -00431 40746— -;; 4 DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 92 -0200 04/01/92 BUILDING /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07/92 54 4342 GTE-CALIFORNIA-1-NCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4202-4304--0061-1 $1-12.61 31@-0200-00431- --40746 r'`- DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 92 -0200 04/01/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07/92 •70 45 R GTE-CALIFORNIA-INCORPORATED00015- 001-400-4601-4304-00676 $3i-4&1 348-0200 00431 40746 46, 47 DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 92 -0200 04/01/92 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07/92 t2 45 R GTE-CALIFORNIA—INCORPORATED 00015 OOi-400-6141-4304-00408 310.27 318-0200-60431 40746 -6Lf .- 50 DIRECT DIAL CHGS/APR 92 -0200 04/01/92 PARKS /TELEPHONE .$0.00 05/07/92 00 67 I 6e 52 LL 53 70 54 71 72 55 /3 56 7q .:' !75 • • m • • • • • 0 0 0 s V Y FINANCE-SFA340 TIME_ 14:02:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCR IPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/07/92 VND # ' ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0006 DATE 05/07/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP to • GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 130-400-3302-4304 00585 *123.20 318-0200 00431. 40746 ' D1REC-T---DEAL-6HGS/APR-92 -0200 04/01/92 PARKING-ENF /TELEPHONE $0.00-051071924 *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************•u-n********************************************* $1.039.24 IC 11 R GTEL 01340 —AREA -CODE -PHONE -CHANGES --28122 -04/04,/92 R GTEL 01340 001-400-1101-4304 00459 CITY-GOUNC-IL /TELEPHONE $2.17 001-400-1121-4304 00510 REA-CODE-PHONE CHANGES --20122------04/04492 CI—Ty CLERK /TELEPHON R GTEL AREA -CODE -PHONE -CHANGES 28122 R GTEL AREA -CODE -PHONE CHANGES 2842 R R 'GTEL 34 do J 3] do 39 39 do 41 42 43 • 44 45 46 io 47 R 01340 04/04/92 CITY ATTORNEY—/TELEPHONE *5.89 001-400-1131-4304 00369 $3.10 01340 001-400-1141-4304 00525 *5.89 04/04-192 01340 REA-CODE-PHONE CHANGES --281-22 04104192 GTEL 01340 REA-CODE-PHONC CHANGES 281-22 04104/9: GTEL REA-CODE-PHONE fANGCS 20122 CITY -TREASURER /T-E1EPHON 001-400-1201-4304 00564 54.96 CITY -MANAGER /T-ELEPHONC 001-400-1202-4304 00580 517.98 1-INANC-E-ADMIN /TELEPHONE CH28122 03354 40748 $0.00-05/07/92 CH28122 03354 40748 $0-00---05 /07-192 a S toy c, CH28122 03354 _ 40748 23 $0.00 05/07192-1:: CH28122 03354 40748 1' S07-00-05/07492-2 CH28122 03354 40748 07-00-05/07492 CH28122 03354 40748 30 31 32 34 35 -$0.70 05/07192-,7 01340 001-400-1203-4304 00585 57.44 CH28122 03354 40748 39 01/011-92 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE $O 00-05/07/92.-qo 42 001-400-1206-4304 00483 58.99 CH28122 03354 40748 43 DATA PROCESSING--1TELEPHONE $0.-00--05107/92 ;; 46 001-400-1207-4304 00389 $5.89 CH28122 03354 40748 4' BUS -LICENSE /TELEPHONE S0-05792 49 50 001-400-1208-4304 00212 $3.10 CH28122 03354 40748 6f GEN APPROI' /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07192-5; 001-400-2101-4304 01021$116.25 CH28122 03354 40748 � POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07/92 59 01340 001-400-2201-4304 00434 $3.10 CH28122 03354 40748 04104192 FIRE /TELEPHONE $0-00--05/07192 6: CH28122 03354 40748 6) $0-00 05407/92- GTEL 5-/07/92- GTEL 0/340 -AREA-CODE PHONE CHANGES -284-22 04/04/92 GTEL 01340 AREA -CODE -PHONE --CHANGES 281..2 04/04/92 R GTEL AREA -COD R GTEL 01340 ONE CHANGES 20122 0410449 01340 AREA CODE -PHONE -CHANGES 20122 04/04-1-92 R GTEL AREA -CODE -PHONE CHANGES 281-22 R 49 • 1 • 51 53 54 55 d 56 • • GTEL AREA -CODE -PHONE -CHANGES 2812 0 • O 0 Q a 01340 001-400-2401-4304 00451 $4.34 2 04/04192 ANIMAL CONTROL--4TELEPHONE 6 67 (0 63 I2 13 ]4 75 0 • • 1 I 0 • • 2 2 • 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 • 0 0 • • • • 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 54 55 56 FINANCE-SFA34O TIME 14:02:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/07/92 PAGE 0007 DATE 05/07/92 2 3 • • ,6 0 3 • • 0 0 0 • 0 0 O • 0 0 • • .r ti:.�Ij .fir PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # DATE INVC ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 5 R GTEL AREA -CODE PHONE CHANGES 284-22 01340 001-400-4101-4304 00584 $14.88 CH28122 03354 40748 04104/92 PLANN1-NO' /TELEPHONE• $0700-05107/92- R GTEL AREA -CODE -PHONE -CHANGED 28422 .01340 04/04192 001-400-4201-4304 00525 $23.87 CH28122 03354 40748 . BUILDING/TELEPHONE 0700-05/07/92- 2 R GTEL REPLACE-PHONE-SET/P-7W. 74007 01340 04/04/92 001-400-4202-4304 00612 $119.49 BR71009 03375 40748 PUB WKS -ADMIN /-TELEPHONE $0.00 05/071-92_ R GTEL ----AREA-CODE-PHONE-CHANGES 20122 01340 04104192 001-400-4202-4304 00613 $32.86 CH28122 03354 40748 PUB WKC ADMIN /TELEPHONE $0-00 05/07/-92- ) 6 R GTEL AREA-C©DE-PHONECHANGE3 28122 01340 001-400-4601-4304 00677 $8.99 CH28122 03354 40748 04104192 9 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE $0.00 05/07/92- R GTEL ARCA CODE -PHONE CI IANGES-281-22 01340 001-400-6101-4304 00409 $3.10 CH28122 03354 40748 2 04/04/92 f ARKS /TELEPHONE $0-00 05/07192-' ' R GTEL EPL-ACE—PHONE-SET/ W. 71007 01340 001-400-6101-4304 00410 $119.48 BR71009 03375 40748 0.104192 PARKS /TEt-EPHONE $0-00-05/C7192 . 5 , R GTEL REPLACE -PHONE -SET/ 01340 105-400-2601-4304 00202 $119.48 BR71009 03375 40748 104 /92 3TREET-LIGHT-i NG-I-1'ELEPHONE $0-00----05f 07/92-- 3 R GTEL —AREA -C -ODE -PHONE -CHANGES 281-22 01340 04104192 110-400-3302-4304 00586 $37.20 CH28122 03354 40748 PARKING--ENF /TELEPHONE $0-00-05/07/-42-- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $668.45 4 R MS KIMBERLY*HAKE CITAT-iON f'HT REFUND 04646 110-300-0000-3302 45353 $48.00 3500628 04717 40749 a OOG20 04/28192 /CGURT ERNES/PARK-I-NO $0.0O-05/07-192 4 51 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************* $48.00 5 5 R CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH RE-EMB-WORK-COMPlAPR-92 04075 705-400-1217-4182 00229 $22,449.23 WORKERS -COMP /WORKERS -COMP -CURRENT --YR 04627 40750 05/04192 $0700---051-07192- 0:00-051 07-{92- *** VENDOR TOTAL ************-1-r******************************************************* $22,449.23 5 S 6 R INTERNATIONAL CONF OF BUILDING • ELDO-CODE-PUBLECATTON 5481 00667 001-400-4201-4305- 00764 $1,609.25 C25481 04213 40751 6 04/15/92 BUILDING /OEPI-GE-OPER-SUPPLIES $0-00— 05107{92-. 6 61 ) ) 2 3 • • ,6 0 3 • • 0 0 0 • 0 0 O • 0 0 • • .r ti:.�Ij .fir r • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:02:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH pEMAND LIST FUR 05/07/92 PAGE 0008 DATE 05/07/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP . ** VENDOR TOTAL ************************- ******u****#.prat*atar************at*******3tn**at# R KAUFMAN BUILDING MATERIALS PLANTER -80X -REPAIR 1-3257 04562 001-400-3101-4309 00135 04/30192 MEDIANS $1,609.25 $314.70 MAINTENANCE—MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************->t*at-tray************ ter***** **** r******arartrarat*******at*atx R $314.70 13259 04815 40752 '1Ml 3 IV 5 • 9 0 : 1 • $327.- 51---05407-492-- EDWARD S.*KREINS 04439 001-400-1203-4201 00914 $41.24 EXPENSES/GM-RECRUITMENT 04/28/192 PERSONNEL /G0NTRACT SERVICEIPR-IVA'F--- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $41.24 04622 40753 $0-00--05/07/9 16 20 21 22 23 23 .74 • 26 • • • • 20 2•, 30 31 32 33 34 35 35 3, 30 30 41 42 43 44 45 46 . 47 49 R R R R LEARNED LUMBER. Mi SC—CHARGES/APR--92 LEARNED LUMBER 00167 MISC. CHARGES -/APR -9C 04430492 'LEARNED LUMBER 00167 MIS0-CHARGES/APR-92 04/30/92 LEARNED LUMBER 00167 M I SC—CHARGES /APR -92 04/30-/`72 001-400-3101-4309 00134 MEDIANS 001-400-3103-4309 01358 ST MAINTENANCE 001-400-4202-4309 00042 $35.27 MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS $17.44 /MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS 00438 40754 -$0.00--05/07/92--Z 24 2] 00438 40754 $0:-00---05/07/92-÷2, $399.70 PUB WKS -ADMIN 4MALNTENANCE-MATERIALO 00167 001-400-6101-4309 01240 04/30/92 PARKS - $31.06 30 3, 00438 40754 $0.00-05/07192- 00438 0.00---05/07192- 00438 40754 /MA-INTENANCE-MATERiALO *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************$48,2o.47 R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. DISCOUNT OFFERED 49 ID5° 51 52 . 53 55 . 56 R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. DISCOUNT -TAKEN LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. MEI SG—CHARGES/APR-92 R R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. MISG:-CHARGES/APR-92 LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. 00077 04/30/92 001-202-0000-2021 00203 $9.39 0 DISCOUNT& -OFFERED • • • • • 0440 40755 40. 00-05/07/92- 00077 001-202-0000-2022 00199 $9.39CR 04/301-92 00077 04430/92 00077 MISC. CHARGES/APR-92 01/30192 .00077 64/30%92 /DISCOUNTS -TAKEN 001-400-4202-4305 00693 $79.99 PUB-WKS-ADMIN—/OFFICE-OPER-SUPPLIES 001-400-4601-4305 01052 $11.13 COMM-RESOURCES--/OFFICE-OPER-SUPPLIEC 00440 40755 $0.00---05/07/92- LOMITA 0.00--05/07/92- 00440 305-400-8144-4201 00014 $288.32 GIP 90-411--/GONTRAGT-BERV-ICEJPR4VAT $0=00---05407492- 40755 *0.00 05/07/92- 00440 40755 0-00-05/07/92 „° G.' 00440 40755 63 6'] G') ]0 ]I .3 74 75 • • • • • s0 • 0 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:02:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH t E:MAND LIST FOR 05/07/92 PAGE , 0009 DATE 05/07/72 9 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC CHK # DATE EXP R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. 00077 P1-ISC. CHARGES/APR 72 04/80/92 305-400-8176-4201 00004 CIP-86 176 $80.81 /CONTRAC±-SERVIC-E/PRIVAT 00440 40755 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************•n**•u* ********•»*#•x*********•»*•x•»*#*** $460.25 $0.00---05/07/92- R CITY OF *LOS ANGELES 04128 f Y-92 -SHARC/COMM-EXPRESG 145-400-3408-4251 00013 $8,986.00 01978 40756 05/07/92- 04/23/92 COMMUTER-XPRESC /CONTRACT -SERVICE -GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************•u*•it*********•n*******n********************* $8,986.00 --$0.00 i• R LOS ANGELES CO. PUBLIC WORKS 00879 ANNUAL -GAS -TANK -FE 03107---04t28/92 305-400-8601-4201 00030 $159.00 R0003107 04840 40757 1 CIF 86-601 /CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $159.00 $0.00---05/07/92- R MANHATTAN CAR WASH 01146 MISC—CHGS1 JAN -MAR -92 03/3412 001-400-2101-4311 01414 $154.80 00345 40758 POL-ICE /AUTO-MAINTENANCC *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $154.80 -*0. 00 05/07/92- 8 9 o R MANHATTAN FORD 00605 MISC—CHARGESIAPR 72 235 0192 001-400-2101-4311 01413 $73.64 123573 00446 40759 3� POLICC /AUTO-MAINTENANCC *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $73.64 $0.00 05/07792- R , J.M.*MCKINNEY 04601 DTS€0(INT 001-202-0000-2021 00205 $9.85 4163 0483E 40760 $0-00-05107192-t; 04838 40760 R OFFERCD 4163 44/17/72 J.M.*MCKINNEY .04601 H------DISCOUNT—TAMEN 4169 04/17/92 001-202-0000-2022 00201 160-400-3102-4309 00696 DISCOUNTC-OFFERED $9.85CR 4163 R J.M.*MCKINNEY 04601 SEWER-CABLE/PUBLIC-WORK 4163 641-19/92 /DISCOUNTS -TAKEN $187.17 4163 $0:-00--05/07192H 04838 40760 05/07-/92-� SEWER/ST-DRAIN /t1AINTCNANCE-MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $187.17 $1977-02 R KENNETH A.*MEERSAND 04138 CITY PROSECUTOR/MAR-92 001-400-1132-4201 00108 $6,012.50 04176 40761 1 03/31192 CTY PROSECUTOR /CONTRAC-T-SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.-00---05107192- 1 8 9 1 • • 0 2 2 2 • 2 3 •13 0 0 • • • • • 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 41 4 4 4 4 450 51 55 56 I\ 2 3 r 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I1 I8 19 20 21 22 23 24 67 0 9 0 4 6 • • • O • • • 0 • • r • • r m • • • • • • • • • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:02:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/07/92 PAGE 0010 DATE 05/07/92 i2 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 21 4 4 5 6 *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************ir*********************************** $6.012.50 ) 7 e 9 9 10 R OLIVER, BARR & VOSE 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00711 $3,964.75 02148 40762 " LEGAL-SERV/MARCH--92 11 2 03/31-/92 420001-CITY-AT-TOR.NEY--1CONTRAC--SERVICE/PRI-VAT $0. 00 -----05/07/92-„ 19 R OLIVER, BARR & VOSE 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00712 $10,376.75 02148 40762 15 LEGALSERV/MARCH-9243/31-192 14 15, CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT-SERVICE/PF.IVAT ---$0.00- -05/07/-92--: 10 R OLIVER, BARR & VOSE 02892 705-400-1209-4201 00258 $37.50 02148 40762 13 LEGAL-SERV/MARCH-92 16 0313142 LIABILITY -T —/- INS-CONTRACT-SERV-iCE1PRiVAT-- $0.00 05/01192-21 17 6 2z *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $14,379.00 23 24 19 20 21 .. , 26 R POSTMASTER 00398 110-400-3302-4305 00897 $2,000.00 PERMIT -460 03390 40763 21 --G-ITATION-NOTICE--POSTAGE T 460 05/04/-92 PARKING ENF /OFFICE -OPER -SUPPLIES i 23 24 $0.00 —05/07192- 3 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,000.00 31 32 25 25 z) 33 34 R THE*PRECINCT 04370 001-400-2101-5402 00095 $11,436.83 91285 04173 40764 35 PATROL -VEHICLE -SET UP i 91205 04/14/92 26 29 30 POL-IEC /-E0l3-iP-MORE THAN -$500 $0. -00--05/07-/92-3) 3A *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************$11,436.63 $11. 43b. 63 3s 31 32 33 42 R DAVID*REPLOGLE 01702 001-210-0000-2110 04846 $1,600.00 32783 04445 40765 43 41£]RFf-GUARANTEE-REFUND--32783 05/05/92 4:5 34 s 36 /DEPOSITS/WORK-GUARANTEE$0=00---05107/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** <�I $1. 600: 00 37 38 39 4i R SHORELINE PRINTING 03505 001-400-1101-4305 00425 $27.07 9699 02145 40766 5' 4o 41 4z DI-IS-@ARDC/R. CSSERTICR 969`7 04/16/92 C--ITY-COUNC-IL /OFFICE-OPER-SUPPL-IES $27-07--05/O7/92--53 R SHORELINE PRINTING 03505 001-400-1121-4305 00201 $27.06 9699 02145 40766 43 DUS-CARDSJi�F.—VALDES 7699 04116192 CITY CLERK /OFFICE -OPER -SUPPLIES $27. 06 05/O7 44 45 -F92=; sn R SHORELINE PRINTING 03505 001-400-1201-4305 00223 $27.06 9699 02145 40766 59 46 DUS-CARDSIRiCK-FERRIN--91/79 04/-101'72 C--T`--MANAGF_R--/OFF-ICF©PER-SUPPLiEC 47 4q $27.00 05/07/92--�" R SHORELINE PRINTING 03505 001-400-2101-4305 01765 $238.15 9698 04169 40766 53� 49 GUBPOENA/BOOI�EING—FORMS -9690 04/161'92 POLICE /OFFICE—OPER—SUPPLIES 50 51 $238 -i5 -05/071-92—`Q 67 66 `i2 53 54 69 774 )2 55 56 1Z17 • • d • • • • • • • • • • • d CITY OF xsnnooA BEACH FzwANoe'spAo^o *n:oxwo LIST TIME u:on:iv FOR 05/07/92 ___ -- PAY vcwoonw^mE VND #_,~ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN � AMOUNT INV/REF PO u �P� * DESCRIPTION DATE ^",^ PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ���1/ '/��,. �. ,� ISS �M °°" vcwoon rorw- *°°y°*°*****v°*************°****°**° 34. . rm'c,o DATE EXP w� 5• SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 11 45255 $19,097.00 o^7�s ��ra7 40 CITE 92 --/COURT FINES/PARKING 1,0.00 05/07/92 "°* VENDOR TOTAL *********************************°*******°************************** *19.097.00 ', n SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-3101-4303 00204 $19.32 00466 4076a 4W ELEC BILLINGS/APR 92-------- --ox/oo/pz - MEDIANS - --- --/orzLIrzsR -------- - *0.:0 • 05/:7/9=''H e( n SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 • oox-400-ozo4-^ooa 00112 *9.30 o0466 4076a �'�� ELEC BILLINGS/APR 92--- —�--- --o4/oo/9z ' TRAFFIC SAFETY/urzLIrIEs - *m. oo o5/o7/9z''' '�� �� `° 0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON co. 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00558 $2,975.66 00466 40768 '��� ELEC BILLINGS/APR 92' ---' '-o*/on,9o--' BLDG MAINT -. -/UTILITIES -- i0. 00 on/c7/9o|1 li. ' x SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001 400-6101-4303 '/ ELEC ozu=1Noo/APn-92 o4/ao/92__'_.'___' PARKS--oo���__/uTzLIT��«��«a oo:�a oor�a |!�V� _ �c�------------ ' i.o.om-- 05/07r92H-| 0.1: n SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Co. 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00355 *1o�25 oo��� �or�a !� ELEC �� ^=. "^"-z,°�,,�,x �� o�/oo/�o---'- --'a�ncsT'�zuxr�wgvoTz�zTzso------�- ' 10.00 o5/crr9z` 0| `** vswnon TOTAL a**°**°*****°°*************°*********°*°*****«***°*�**************°* *o'��o��p /.,/ -__!'' z 0 9_ *** vswoon TOTAL ***o***°*»***************************^*****°************************ 4TH orn/con: BUS SHARE -05983 ozu'zwG/ApnzL-'p2- CITY oF°ronnAwosnourxsnw CALIFORNIA GAS CO.-0*/23/92 00841 00170 o4/3o/92-001«oo 4uo4400n «o��7 145-400-3402-4201 «»zro 'oonnorsR BLDG nAzw._/urzLzr/ES /cowSERVICES BUS */39.39 �n�««�oao4n7ro---. |. 0 L .i., 0 40769 |:��no�o05/:7,92 °°° vswoon 'TOTAL °**°*****°******°**«*«**»*******°°***°************* AO 40771 H Onnz000umr OFFERED rnzwvG�HARDWARE 00123 04/30/92 »oz - 1 00202—ozoo ~`'~ OFFERED����.r�o'o 05/07/92 � ` w `^.I 40 . |`/ | '@ • • TRIANGLE HARDWARE •00123 001-202'0000-2022 00198 *117.7200.."~"yn' TAKEN --- '- -'-'--o4/oo/90 -/DISCOUNTS TAKEN w/arr 4"). 00 40771 it' 0 05/07/92 :' |� 48 1- @8 1 • |./| / /ND vat Irfl. .����������������/������*Jq������������•� 1,1 1{,'"�� ',MANCE- SFA34O fIM= 11..02:49 FAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION FR.TANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/APR-92-- TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/APR 92 TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/APR-93 TRIANGLE_ HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/APR-92 TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC.--- CHARGES/APR--92 TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC.-- CHARGES/APR -92 'rR IANGLE HARDWARE MIS:.- CHARGES/APR •92 TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC:-- CHARGE/APR--92 CITY OF HERM(JSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/07/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0012 LAE 05/17/92 INV/REF f'O -It CHK # AMOUNT !JIIEh1C DATE EXP 00123 001-400-2101-4187 00482 $10. 70 -04/30/92 - -POLICE_ -- ---_ ---- -- /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 00123 001-400-2201-4311 00428 $2.64 -04/30/92- - FIRE - /AUTO MAINTENANCE - 00123 001-400-3103-4304 01356 $25.22 04/30/92------ - • ST MAINTENANCE- /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00123 001-400-310.4-4209 00884 - 04/30/92 - - TRAFFIC SAFETY -- 105. 60 /MAINTENAN.CE---MATER IA_S 00123 001-400-4201-4305 00763 $34.03 04/30/92 - -- BUILDING --- ----- - -- /OFFICE -OPER SUPPLIES - 00123 001-400-4204-•4309 02327 04/30./92 BLDG MAINT $552.47 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00123 001-400-4205-4309 00640 $7.10 0.4/30/92— EQUIP SERVICE- ---/MAINTENANCE-MATERIALS 00475 40771 $0.00 05/07/92 004'75 40771 $0 00 05/07/92 n0475 40771 40. 00 05/07/9:? 00475 40771 $n, n0 05/07/92 00475 40771 $0. 00 05/07/92 00475 40771 40.00 05/07/92 00475 40771 $0.00- 05/07/92 00123 001-400-4601-4308 00680 $46.52 00475 40771 04/30/92 COMM RESOURCES- /PROGRAM -MATERIALS 90.00 05/07/92 TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 MISC.--CHARGES/APR 92 04/30/92 TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/APR 92--- 001.23 04/30/92 TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 MISC,-CHARGES/APR-92 04/30/92 001-400-6101-•4309 01239 $126.76 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 105-400-2601-4309 00511 $109.40 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 110-400-3302-4309 00935 938.95 PARKING ENF ._ ---/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *-** VENDOR TOTAL ************* **********************'I*** **Arta***** ****n;raF;rt **** ** $1,059.43 R MS SILVIA*WILFREDO CITATION -PMT REFUND 04644 110-300-0000-3302 03626 04/28/92 00475 40771 90.00 05/07/92 00475 40771 4.0.00 05/07/92 00475 40771 $0. 00 05/07/92 45354 $20.00 1803626 n4716 40772 /COURT FINES/PARKING -- - -- $0.00 -- 05/07/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************',1 * f *********** ********* ** ***** *** PAY CODE TOTAL:*'.r***t**;***s******:*****it**********.p.a.**.,***********:**** $20. n0 ************** $109, 503. 67 *** TOTAL WARRANTS *** ****:Ka***************•a*;***eta****,**u***** *na*rr*****r*x********a**** $109,503.67 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LISTED ON TO 7— TO �� INCLUSIVE, OF THE WARRANT REGISTER FOR �L/�7d ARE ACCURATE, FUND. ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO T* 'UDGET. /i/ BY FI A(TC E DIRECTOR DATE�Z/9.2s I., © • .s S 1 • I . ' • S • Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 7, 1992 City Council Meeting of May 12, 1992 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS May 14, 1992 Joint Council workshop meeting with Chamber of Commerce and Planning Commission May 26, 1992 Student of the Month for May Review of encroachment permit issued for 2930 Strand Identify misc. revenue, develop appropriate fee (GIP) Council 10/9/90 Map and time schedule street sweeping Coordination of street sweeping with trash pickup days Street lighting/Crossing Guard (a) resolution approving report (b) resolution setting public hearing for June 23 Recommendation re. report on survey- ing discrepancies and existing procedure for protecting survey monuments along Monterey Blvd. and Bayview Dr. between 16th & 19th Streets Public Hearings Lowering of R-3 height limits Adoption by reference of 1991 editions Uniform Building Code, UBC Standards, Uniform Housing Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Fire Code and Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Bldgs. June 9, 1992 - 1 - Public Works/City Mgr. Finance Director for Public Wks. Dir. Public Works Dir. Public Works Director Public Works Director Planning Director Building Director 1 c CIP 85-137 - Valley Ardmore overlay - accept as complete Approval of Land Use Element (GIP) Dispute Resolution Services lease renewal June 11 or 18, 1992 Joint meeting of Council with Planning Commission June 23, 1992 Student of the Month for June Report on civilian enforcement officers (GIP) Street lighting/Crossing Guard public hearing July 28, 1992 4th Quarter CIP status report Quarterly update of Goals Implementation Program August 11, 1992 Hope Chapel Lease renewal (Rms. 5, 6A) September 8, 1992 Association for Retarded Citizens lease renewal (Rm. 1, 2, 15) South Bay Hospital District lease renewal (Rm 9) Easter Seals lease renewal (Rms. 16, 17) December, 1992 Project Touch lease renewal (Rm.C) Public Works Director Planning Director Community Resources Dir. Public Safety Director Public Works Director Public Works Director City Manager Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Caltrans utility maintenance agrmt. Historic Preservation Ordinance (with Land Use Element) Public Works Director Planning Director ***************************************************************** Initiated by Party Date Council 5/8/90 Re. oil project CUP - define "temporary" as relates to height of project Planning Director Goal 4 5/16/90 Options to computerize per- sonnel as part of payroll function Finance Director Council 8/14/90 Review of standard CUP conditions Planning Dir. Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Public Works Dir. City Mgr.2/21/91 RFP for computer system Data Processing Council 3/12/91 South School Conceptual design Community Resources Council 6/6/91 Review Bldg/Zoning Code changes to improve liveability Planning Director Staff 7/25/91 Adjustment of Park Tax Building Director Council 8/27 Revision of allowable uses in open space zone Planning Council 9/24/91 Effect of nonconforming ordinance on damaged structures Planning Dept. Report on productivity incentives for employees (GIP) Personnel Director Participate w/school civics program coordinator (GIP) Personnel Director Statistical survey - requested at 4/23/91 meeting Report on cost effectiveness of downtown enforcement (GIP) Police/Finance Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council May 5, 1992 City Council Meeting of May 12, 1992 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of April 1992. Respectfully submitted, Gary Brut h City Tre.-urer NOTED: �C dt-uc.�J u--(- Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager itt INSTITUTION LAIF TOTAL INVESTMENT REPORT - APRIL 1992 DATE OF DATE OF INVESTMENT MATURITY ASKING PRICE MARKET VALUE INTEREST BALANCE 4/1/92 Investment Investment Maturity Investment Investment Maturity BALANCE 4/30/92 $7,148,756.18 800,000.00 200,000.00 <200,000.00> 1,400,000.00 150,000.00 <100,000.18> $9,398,756.00 LACPIF Railroad Right -of -Way Account BALANCE 4/01/92 Investment BALANCE 4/30/92 MERRILL LYNCH CORPORATE NOTES: Ford Motor Credit Co. Investment U.S. TREASURY BOND: Investment $ 917,209.79 122,864.77 1,040,074.56 $ 500,000.00 $ 996,875.00 4/01/92 4/09/92 4/22/92 4/23/92 5/19/88 5/14/90 4/14/92 4/29/92 5.680% 7.34% 5/20/93 $ 500,000.00 $ 520,820 9.10% 2/15/93 $ 996,875.00 $1,043,125 8.49% Investment INVESTMENT TOTAL $1,005,937.50 9/14/90 6/30/94 $1,005,937.50 $1,080,625 8.50% $11,901,568.50 SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST BALANCE 3/1/92 $ 677,953.67 Adjustment <152,175.42> BALANCE 3/31/92 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE CO. BALANCE 12/31/91 BALANCE 12/31/91 TRUSTEE TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 525,778.25 8.625% $ 11,717.01 11,717.01 $ 537,495.26 13,479,138.32 Respectfully Submitted, Gary Brutch City Tre-surer 7.5% April 28, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 12, 1992 REQUEST FOR 30 DAY EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT FOR THE ACTING GENERAL SERVICES DIRECTOR AND ONE ACTING POLICE SERGEANT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council extend for thirty (30) days the temporary appointment of the following: 1. Acting General Services Director. 2. Acting Police Sergeant Background: General Service Department: The Acting General Services Director was appointed on May 22, 1991. Filling of this position is being held pending review of the organizational structure of the Parking Enforcement Division. Police Department: The temporary appointment for Acting Police Sergeant was effective on September 16, 1991 to accommodate the appointment of the Public Safety Director to the position of Interim City Manager. The Department has requested this temporary appointment be continued until May 21, 1992 for continued shift supervision during the medical leave of one sergeant and the vacation of another. Analysis: Section 2-33 of the Hermosa Beach City Code precludes a temporary appointment of an individual to a permanent Civil Service position for more than six months without approval from the City Council every thirty days. Respectfully submitted, Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director rab/extend - 1 - Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager May 4, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of May 12, 1992. PROJECT TOUCH LEASE RENEWAL AGREEMENT (ROOMS 3 AND 11) RECOMMENDATION The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff recommend that Council approve the attached lease agreements between the City and Project Touch for Room 3 and 11 in the Community Center and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreements. BACKGROUND Project Touch presently leases Room C, Room 11 and 3 in the Community Center. They have been tenants in the Center since October, 1979. They have served Hermosa, Redondo and Manhattan Beach city's high risk youth and their families for 16 years. Project Touch is a juvenile diversion program whose services include social and educational enrichment, counseling, meals, wilderness challenge camping and stepteen/stepfamily groups. ANALYSIS The lease space for Room 3 is 529 sq. ft. with a monthly rental of $423 and for Room 11 at 400 sq. ft. it is $320. ($.80 sq. ft.) This rate will be in effect until July 1, 1992 and then will increase to $.84 sq. ft. or $444 and $336 respectfully. The attached lease conforms to the present square footage rental policy (approved by the Commission January 24, 1990 and by City Council March 13, 1990) with all other conditions of the former lease remaining the same. Their residency in the Community Center has been of great value in addressing a vital social service function for Hermosa Beach. Concur: Respectfully submitted, Maas a Erns Administrative Aide Community Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal Impact: Frederick R. Ferrin Viki Copeland, Director City Manager 1 Finance Dept. �f HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 12th day of May 1992 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and Project Touch (Lessee). A. RECITALS: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of one (1) year commencing on the 1st day of June ,1992 , and ending on the 31st day of May ,1993 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room 3 (529 sq. ft.) 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac- cording to the following schedule: June 1, 1992, thru June 30, 1992, $423/mo. $.80 sq.ft. July 1, 1992, thru May 31, 1993, $444/mo. $.84.sq.ft. Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of the following month. 1 3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises except such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such signs shall be in accordance with the policy established by the Lessor. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Counseling services And for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Depratment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto -and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the.purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any di- rect or indirect act or any omission of the lessee, its of- ficers, agents and employees arising out of the lessee's use of said premises. The lessee, at its own cost, expense and risk shall defend any and all actions, suits or other pro- ceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 3 10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal- ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: Project Touch 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attn: Julie Dorr Feys Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first hereinabove set forth. ATTEST: APPROVD A • TO FORK CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY DATE: LESSEE: 5 HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 12th day of May 1992 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and Project Touch (Lessee). A. RECITALS: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of one (1) year commencing on the 1st day of July ,1992 , and ending on the 30th day of June ,1993 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room 11 400 sq. ft. 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac- cording to the following schedule: July 1, 1992, to June 30, 1993: $336/mo. $.84 sq. ft Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of the following month. 1 3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises except such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such signs shall be in accordance with the policy established by the Lessor. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Counseling services And for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Depratment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for, personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. 2 WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any di- rect or indirect act or any omission of the Lessee, its of- ficers, agents and employees arising out of the lessee's use of said premises. The lessee, at its own cost, expense and risk shall defend any and all actions, suits or other pro- ceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 3 10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal- ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: Project Touch 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attn: Julie Dorr Feys Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first hereinabove set forth. ATTEST: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY DATE: LESSEE: 5 64,te,„,74 — 535 May 5, 1992 Honorable Mayor City Council Meeting of and Members of The City Council May 12, 1992 RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO STUDY SECTION 4-2(6) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommeided that City Council approve the attached resolution directing the Planning Commission to study Section 4-2(6) of the Zoning Ordinance. BACKGROUND During their regular meeting of April 28, 1992, the City Council directed Staff to prepare the attached ordinance directing the Planning Commission to study Hermosa Beach Zoning Code 4-2(6). This direction came as a result of a request from a licensee to allow the business to continue entertaining clients within the home. Respectfully submitted, /y JJ 1� Mary Fehskens Business License Inspector Concur: William Grove Director of Building & Safety Rick Ferrin City Manager lg 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO STUDY SECTION 4-2(6) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO HOME OCCUPATION REGULATIONS. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on April 28, 1992, and discussed Section 4-2(6) as it relates to regulations pertaining to Home Occupations and made the following findings: A. Sections 4-2(6), which sets forth regulations for Home Occupations, needs refining and clarification; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby initiate consideration of amendments to Section 4-2(6) of the Zoning Ordinance and directs the Planning Commission to study changing the regulations. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 12th day of May, 1992. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: - APPROVED AS TO FORM: 11 CITY CLERK ITY ATTORNEY May 6, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 12, 1992 TIME EXTENSION FOR SUBMISSION OF 1992-93 PRELIMINARY BUDGET, 1992-93 BUDGET CALENDAR Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. extend the date for submission of the 1992-93 Preliminary Budget from May 15, 1992 to June 4, 1992. 2. receive and file the 1992-93 Budget Calendar. Background: Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 2-98 requires the City Manager to submit a preliminary budget on or before May 15th of each year. Analysis: Since the new City Manager just arrived on April 27, it is requested that the May 15 deadline be extended to June 4, 1992. According to the City Attorney, a motion of the City Council to extend the deadline is the necessary action. This additional time will allow the City Manager to become thoroughly familiar with the departmental budget requests and convene a city staff task force to investigate and formulate reorganizations, project and acquisition reductions, as well as recommend service and staff reductions if absolutely necessary. A 1992-93 Budget Calendar is attached. The schedule calls for a special meeting/public hearing on June 30 to adopt the budget. This date was selected to allow the maximum amount of time prior to adoption. Depending on the results of the first study session, we may be able to move the public hearing/budget adoption to the regularly scheduled meeting of June 23. In past years, two study sessions have not been necessary, but have been scheduled in case they are needed. Concur: Viki Copeland Frederick R. Ferrin Finance Director City Manager budget/extbud - 1 - 1h 1992-93 BUDGET CALENDAR MARCH 26, 1992 Instructions to Departments APRIL 2, 1992 Revenue estimates due to Finance Director APRIL 8, 1992 Department budget requests/Capital Improvement Program due to Finance Director. APRIL 27 - MAY 6, 1992 City Manager meetings, tour with each department. MAY 5 - 7, 1992 Department budget meetings with City Manager/Finance Director JUNE 4, 1992 (Thursday) Preliminary Budget to City Council JUNE 8, 1992 (Monday) Budget/CIP study session. JUNE 18, 1992 (Thursday) 2nd study session (if needed) *JUNE 30, 1992 (Tuesday) Special Meeting of the City Council Public Hearing/Budget Adoption *Depending on results of the study session, adoption and public hearing may be scheduled for the regular meeting of June 23 if no second study session needed. 1y - S 534 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members, of the City Council FROM: Michael Schubach, P1a in,4sctor SUBJECT: Adoption of the Resolution for the Condominium Project at 1901 Pacific Coast Highway DATE: May 6, 1992 Attached is the resolution prepared by City Attorney pursuant -to City Council's action on April 28, 1992 denying, without prejudice, a condominium project at 1901 Pacific Coast Highway. NOT D: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager p/memo2 - 1 - 1i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO CONSTRUCT A THREE UNIT CONDOMINIUM UPON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1901 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. WHEREAS, on April 28, 1992 the City Council held public hearings to consider a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Tentative Parcel Map to construct a three unit condominium upon property located at 1901 Pacific Coast Highway; and WHEREAS, numerous persons spoke at the hearings in favor of and against the granting of the Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the evidence presented which includes, but is not limited to: 1. The various staff reports 2. Letters and petitions from residents of the city 3. Statements in favor and in opposition 4. Oral testimony presented at the hearing 5. Relevant provisions of the Municipal Code Section 1. The City Council finds that: 1. The intensity and the type of the development including, but not limited to, side yard setback and vehicle access to Pacific Coast Highway is not in character with the development standards of the surrounding area. 2. The project exceeds the permissible side yard setbacks as required by Section 1217 of the Zoning Code. 3. The proposed driveway slope for vehicular ingress and egress at the point of the public right-of-way constitutes a potential public safety hazard. Section 2. In view of all of the evidence and based on the foregoing findings, the City Council concludes as follows: 1. The site for the proposed use is not adequate in size, shape and circumstances to accommodate the project as proposed. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. The design of the development proposed is not consistent with the required setbacks and would negatively impact the neighborhood's integrity and the character of the community. 3. The driveway slope of the proposed project will have an adverse effect upon pedestrian and vehicle safety and may constitute a hazard to the public welfare. 4. Any of the above conclusions, independent from the others, is sufficient grounds to deny the granting of the subject approvals. Section 3. In view of all of the evidence, and based on the foregoing findings and conclusions, the City Council hereby decides as follows: 1. The application for a Precise Development Plan is hereby denied without prejudice to complying with the side yard setback requirements of the zoning code and reducing the slope of the driveway at the point of the public right-of- way. 2. The application for issuance of a Conditional Use Permit is hereby denied without prejudice as set forth above. 3. The application for a Tentative Parcel Map is hereby denied without prejudice as set forth above. 4. The applicant shall be notified of this action by mail and shall have six months to submit new plans consistent with the findings of this resolution. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause the same to be processed in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this 12th day of May, 1992. President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 9175 2. s//z-AA- CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council __f�es FROM: Michael Schubach, P-1an' " ector SUBJECT: Priority List of Studies DATE: May 5, 1992 Attached is a list of current and future studies initiated by either the Planning Commission or City Council. Since the number of studies is becoming rather large, staff felt it was necessary - to create this priority list to guide us on how we should spend our time and effort. The Planning Commission has reviewed the list and received and filed it. Recommendation Please confirm the priority list as recommended, or make changes where deemed appropriate. NOT D: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager — 1 — p/memo? lj PLANNING DEPARTMENT STUDIES, PRIORITY LIST Current Studies and Text Amendments In Progress (In order of recommended priority) TOPIC LOWERING HEIGHT IN R-3 ZONE OBTAINING PERMIT AUTHORITY FROM COASTAL COMMISSION OBJECTIONABLE ODORS ADULT ENTERTAINMENT INITIATED BY C.C. & P.C. C.C. P.C. P.C. RESIDENTIAL USE OF PUBLIC R -O -W'S C.C. (Public Works Department Study) OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS ADJACENT TO LIVING AREAS; BASEMENTS AND GRADING (INCL. DRIVEWAY GRADES) RESIDENTIAL FENCES ZONING ORDINANCE "CLEAN-UP" (includes re -numbering, clearing ambiguities, updates for compliance with State Law, etc.) P.C. P.C. P.D. STATUS 1st public hearing 4/21 Ongoing - *June/July PC complete, C.C. action pending 95% complete CC hrg pending status report to P.C. 5/5/92 policy adopted text amend. discussion 5/5/92 P.C. *continued to June P.C. in progress, draft to P.C. *June/July Future Studies/Text Amendments (In INCREMENTALLY IMPLEMENT ADVISORY VOTE ON RESIDENTIAL BULK REDUCTION: a. Height b. Setbacks c. Open Space d. Parking SIGN ORDINANCE UPDATE AND INCORPORATION INTO ZONING ORDINANCE STANDARDS FOR SMALL LOTS DAMAGED NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES 2. order of recommended. priority) C.C. C.C. & P.C. C.C. direction needed. P.C. *scheduled for 5/19 P.C. *sched. for June/July P.C. C.C. reso of intent 4/21 P.C. STANDARD CONDITION FOR POLICE CHIEF P.C. APPROVAL OF SECURITY FOR OFF -SALE ALCOHOL ESTABLISHMENTS SEC. 10-7 & 10-8 RE. STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR ON -SALE & OFF -SALE ALCOHOL ESTABLISHMENTS HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT *tentatively scheduled 3 *scheduled for June P.C. C.C. *scheduled for June P.C. C.C. reso of intent 5/12/92 p/priority STUDY SECTIONS OF THE GENERAL PLAN REVISIONS (in progress) Land Use Element DEFINITIONS AND PARKING STANDARDS FOR HOTEL AND MOTEL USES HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROPERTY MAINTENANCE DOWNTOWN SCENARIOS / R/UDAT REDUCED PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RESTAURANTS EXPANSIONS PRIMARY/SECONDARY USES LAND USE DEFINITIONS PROXIMITY OF ALCOHOL ESTABLISHMENTS TO RESIDENTIAL ZONES DOWNTOWN PARKING REQUIREMENTS PERMITTED USES IN OPEN SPACE ZONES VIS-A-VIS NEW PUBLIC FACILITIES DESIGNATION REVIEW OF THE REMAINING INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP AND ZONING MAP REVIEW OF POTENTIAL CHANGES TO GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Future General Plan Element Revisions OPEN SPACE ELEMENT CONSERVATION ELEMENT SAFETY ELEMENT NOISE ELEMENT p/studlist 4- STAFF ITEMS a. Planning Department priority list of studies. Mr. Schubach stated grant monies could be obtained in F.Y. 1992 if this project were slowed. The Staff is very close to completion, with the most of the drafts completed. He explained current status and actions relating to the public right-of-ways. He had talked to Community Resources regarding the Pier project and noted the schedule was not clear, with plans to present the project to the Planning Commission in June or July 1992. The Commission discussed the project schedule dates, determining with Mr. Schubach that the schedule was quite misleading. The February 1992 Joint Meeting was discussed, including the lack of resultant action. Comm. Di Monda confirmed the City Council had voted to approve the Commission's review of off -sale and on -sale of alcohol with respect to Article 10. Mr. Schubach stated the requests of the Council and Commission would be addressed at the same time, and should have been noted in this report. RECEIVE AND FILE. b. Memorandum regarding Planning Commission liaison for Ap 28, 199 'ty Council Meeting. Comm. Di Monda _ted he might possibly attend Schubach stated the ission's recommendatio Staff was not opposing Planning Commiss'•n. RECEIVE AND FILE. c. Tentative future •enda. Planning„Commmissio Chmn. Ketz stated a spec will be addressed at --£he next RECEIVE AND FINE. d. City --Council minutes of March 24, 26, 31, 1992. RECEIVE AND FILE. e meeting. Mr._ ould be submitted. study on the re± ntial open space scheduled meeting. P.C.Minutes 4/21/92 May 5, 1992 Honorable Mayor and City Council Meeting City Council Members May 12, 1992 REQUEST FOR FUNDS TO PAY BANK SERVICE CHARGES Recommendation: The City Council appropriate $24,000.00 from the General Fund Contingency account to the City Treasurer Contract Services account to pay 1991/92 fiscal year Bank of America banking service charges. Overview: Municipalities, much the same as the private sector, are required to pay bank service charges. These monthly service charges can be paid by two different methods either in hard dollars, (the City is billed monthly for service charges and a warrant is issued to pay the charges); or in compensating balance, (the City can accumulate a bank balance at a level to defray service charges). In the recent past the Bank required $165.59 in bank balances to offset $1.00 in bank service charges. The City was able to meet these balance requirements and defray the charges by maintaining a bank balance equal to the amount of money owed on outstanding warrants. In January 1992 the Bank increased service charge rates requiring $325.64 to offset $1.00 in charges. To offset this rate increase, the City would be forced to maintain a fund balance significantly higher than the balance needed to pay outstanding warrants. The difference in bank balances between what is needed to pay outstanding warrants and what is needed to pay bank service charges will be invested. We have been meeting often with representatives of the Bank of America attempting to reduce bank charges. Additionally; consistant with Government Code Section 41003, 53630, and 53635; my office has contacted other local banks to compare service charge rates. At this point the Bank of America still has the lower rate schedule. I have contacted other treasurers and the Treasurers Association. Everyone contacted is experiencing the it same rate increase problem. Collectively, we have not been able to lower service charges to 1990 levels. Of course the banks are blaming the rate increase on their attempt to cover increased costs of doing business caused by the savings & loan bailout. The Finance Director recommends appropriating the funds from the Contingency account which has a balance of $669,762. The purpose of this account is to provide funds for unplanned, unexpected expenditures or revenue fluctuations. Respectfully submitted, ---?"1---4 Ga Brut h City Tre surer Noted: N.77...%-.-c31,„,..,,j31, --7/_.4../LA...___) Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: V¢a4.4(._ Viki Copeland Finance Director */c>/9 May 5, 1992 City Council Meeting May 12, 1992 Mayor and Members of the City Council AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO COUNCIL CORRESPONDENCE; AVAILABILITY TO THE PUBLIC Recommendation: Introduce the attached ordinance amending Section 2-2.5 of the Municipal Code, and waive further reading. Background: At its meeting of April 28, 1992, the City Council directed the preparation of an ordinance to amend Section 2-2.5 of the City's Municipal Code by deleting the following: "Correspondence addressed to the city council shall not become a public record until received and filed by the council at a regular, special or adjourned regular meeting of the council." The attached draft ordinance accomplishes the direction given by Council at its last meeting. Elaine Doerfling, ity erk Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 92 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO COUNCIL CORRESPONDENCE; AVAILABILITY TO THE PUBLIC THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 2-2.5 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby laliAne=t1tread as follows: "Section 2-2.5. Council correspondence; availability to the public. Correspondence shall not be read aloud at a council meeting unless requested by a majority of the council present." Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Section 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the - 1 - passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of 1 the city council at which the same is passed and adopted. 2 3 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 26th day of Kay, 1992. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO yAtt rney CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY TREASURER RE: COMMENDING FIRE AND POLICE DEPARTMENTS DATE: MAY 4, 1992 During the recent civil unrest in Los Angeles County our local Fire and Police Departments were called upon to perform their legally required duties in Cities outside of Hermosa Beach, as well as continue to provide service to our community. I would like to thank these Fire and Police public servants for a job well done under the most dangerous conditions. . / L_d G-ry L. : utsch City Tr_asurer c.c. City Manager Public Safety Director I May 2, 1992 'June t lVitTants Ilan/Lathan �'•c. -4cunoia 1 zacrz. C.--4 J0254 Honorable Mayor and Council M.;Y 0 5 +992 • _iC City CN,t ,�f Cley of mou B CI / !/ City of Hermosa Beachv Re: Budget rev Most cities, including Hermosa Beach, are attempting to reduce costs to balance declining revenues. Some cities are even reducing elected officials salary. In Hermosa Beach, elected positions do not require any qualifications or experience. These positions have been traditionally ones of overseers and a public service. The Deputy City Treasurer, Deputy City Clerk, City Manager and all staff must be tested and qualified and are full time jobs. An area that has never been audited as to hours required are the jobs of City Treasurer and City Clerk. I believe the City Clerk has provided an average of 40 hours per week for several years even though considered part time. The Clerk's office has detailed duties discription but the Treasurers office has no such detail. Enclosed is a telephone survey of other General Law cities. Some are from our local telephone book and others from a list provided by our personnel dept. that are normally used for comparison. Where the list states "appointed", those employees generally are 'civil service and/or qualified by normal hiring practice with testing. Their salaries are not general public information. In light of the budget shortfall, it would be prudent for the Council to justify elected official's salaries for the public. Sincerely, P.S. Apparently, payroll dept. has neglected to reduce, since March of this year, the City Treasurer's salary by the 5% he volunteered in his memo of Feb.4 for fiscal year '91-'92. Please include this information and letter in the next agenda. 4b MONTHLY PAY OF ELECTED OFFICIALS '%4A M CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK CITY TREASURER Hermosa Beach $300 $ 1399 tz�(t=rr5 =Zi3--S- Y•(.',,Ll/ Bell$323 +$135 ex. $ 752 /,Y 317-$t Claremont $400 Appointed 6,19-.7 -236c Coronado $300 + $300 $1325 r 3c -ti $ 350 Appointed Administrator of: Personnel, Finance and does Treasurer Ptc-ftp, _:,..;Z-i4"7C El Segundo $483 $930 $930 (35mi1 port.) ( + benefits or $500)(+ benefits or $500) Gardena $400 $3488-$4477 $300 Mayor $600 (full time) 1i3'i/'J-3.RU3 Glendora $250 Appointed Appointed 71 -1: -J7 -3S// Laguna Beach $300 $4483 $1654(1 s time) (full time) yin daily till noon) (no deputy) �;7LaVerne $250 Appointed Appointed Lomita $300 Appointed Appointed Manhattan Beach $200 $200 $200 RPV None + ex. Appointed Finance Dir.does Treas Treas. duties S%8. 3og-.2.S/fi , San Gabriel $282 $702 $150 J,O-�f.;;'/-�S;;t7 Seal Beach $300 $3619-$4418 Finance Dir. does (full time) Treas. duties. Colton $400 $4120 ( one deputy) $2479 (part time) (no deputy) (Though Hawthorne is not comparable city I include because of recent publicity regarding the City Clerk) Hawthorne $671 $600 Tax Administrator is paid $600 extra for Treas. duties. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM May 12, 1992 TO: Frederick R. Ferrin , City Manager FROM: Robert A. Blackwood, Personnel Director14- SUBJECT: Councilmember Midstokke's Agenda Question Item 4(b) Regarding the salary for City Treasurer: The City Treasurer's salary is established by Council Resolution at 50% of the Sr. Account Clerk top step. In September 1991, the Sr. Account Clerk top step was increased 2% (from $2524 to $2574). At that time the City Treasurer de- clined any increase in his compensation (he would have received a $25/mo increase). On March 1, 1992, the Sr. Account Clerk top step was increased 3% (from $2574 to $2651). At that time a Personnel Action was pre- pared by the Personnel Department for the City Treasurer position indicating the salary at $1325/mo (50% of $2651). This Personnel Action was signed by the City Treasurer and processed through Finance. The effect of this was to bring the City Treasurer's salary up to the authorized level. Effective May 1, 1992, at the request of the City Treasurer, the monthly salary for City Treasurer has been reduced from $1325/mo to $1300/mo. This action decreased the City Treasurer's salary by 2%. The purpose of this action was to reinstate the City Treasurer's denial of the September 1, 1991 2% increase and im- plement the March 1, 1992 3% increase. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY TREASURER RE: RESPONSE TO COUNCIL MEMBER MIDSTOKKE'S REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ON CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 4(B) DATE: MAY 12, 1992 My salary was reduced by 2%. Instead of the remaining 3% pay reduction, I decided to take all conference and seminar expenses ($750.00) out of my budget. This action becomes a significant cost to me, but a real attempt to reduce City costs. G Brut h City Treasurer c.c. City Manager 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 4317 TRAINING CONFERENCE EXPENSE Covers required membership in Municipal Treasurers Association and revisions to the to the City Treasurers Handbook. Training will continue, however, cost will be paid by the Treasurer. Important conferences will be attended, however, costs will be paid by the Treasurer. OBJECT CODES 3401 ACCOUNT TITLE INTEREST INCOME PROJECTED INTEREST REVENUE EXPLANATION The projected interest revenue for 1992/93 is $450,000.00 based on the following assumption: Interest rates will continue to fall, averag- ing approximately 5% return during this period. Our investment portfolio balance will shrink in size due to a reduction in revenue volume. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: A May 4, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of tI?e City Council City Council Meeting of May 12, 1992 HEARING REGARDING REMOVAL OF PARKING ON HERMOSA VALLEY GREENBELT Recommendation It is recommended by staff that Council receive the public testimony regarding the Greenbelt Parking Lot. The Planning Commission and the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission recommend that Council select rendering A as was presented at the March 24, 1992 Council meeting as a parking lot design for the site. Staff recommends that Council adopt the recommendation from the Commissions or an alternative parking solution as listed in the analysis below. Background At the March 24, 1992 City Council meeting, the Commissions and staff recommended that Council approve a parking plan that would accommodate up to 75 vehicles (the Planning Commission had suggested a possible reduction of spaces to 54) and that would add landscaping to the Greenbelt parking lot located on the south side of Pier Avenue. The amount allocated from the Parks, Recreation and Facility Tax Fund is $111,500 for this potential parking project. At that time, Council rejected the recommendation and voted to remove all parking from the site. There has been no parking at that location since March 25, 1992. In response to public testimony at the April 14, 1992 Council meeting, Council voted to set a public hearing on this item for the May 12, 1992 meeting. Analysis This issue can be divided into three (3) basic parts: (1) Parking needs: In response to the recent direction from Council to close the Greenbelt Lot, staff has received substantial complaints from recreation facility users (i.e., Little League) as well as library users that -the closure has hampered their ability to park near City facilities. A formal parking needs assessment has not been conducted since the lot closure, however, parking enforcement staff members have experienced difficulties at the Clark Field site, with users parking in unauthorized areas because they cannot find a space at the park (see attached memo from Interim General Services Director, Leroy Staten). There have also been incidents of people parking in unauthorized areas on the Greenbelt (near the Clark Building area) . - 1 - 5 r..wa+s.+...I. .+.T.'- -�Rs.>'t+!rv"yr.•.�+ .rr M-,cka. vy..�.My •+�-• -- --1i-- -v-.... w,- lY�lsiiof::]fAHXw[N The Greenbelt lot has traditionally been used for special event parking; for beach visitors; for upper Pier Avenue business parking and for the Community Center and City Hall spillover parking. Absent the Greenbelt lot, it is projected that the impact on neighborhoods around Clark Field and on downtown parking will be increased. (2) Coastal Commission authority: It appears as if previous reports that the removal of this parking lot would be in opposition to the City's agreement with the Coastal Commission to allow for resident permit parking may not be accurate. The City in fact, does meet the number of spaces required without this site (see attached report from Planning Director, Michael Schubach) ; however, the Coastal Commission will still have to review and approve any change in the use of the Greenbelt property because it is in the coastal zone. With the Coastal Commission's shared concern for parkland and beach access, they may have some difficulty with total lot closure and may propose a compromise as they did with Manhattan Beach's greenbelt lot. (3) Greenbelt open space: Council sentiment expressed at the March 24, 1992 meeting, communicated a strong desire on behalf of Council to maximize the open space on the 19.5 acre Greenbelt. The proposed lot (rendering A) would occupy approximately .6 acres. Staff is sympathetic to Council's desire to preserve the open space area on the Greenbelt. The residents made that point clear when they voted overwhelmingly to acquire the land and to restrict the parking on it to the two (2) areas previously utilized. However, if closing one of these areas has the net result of causing enforcement problems on other areas of the Greenbelt and on other City parks, it would seem that overall, we may not be solving the problem. Staff is also aware that the Greenbelt parking that has existed in the past has not been satisfactory from an aesthetic or functional standpoint as it has been the site for overnight parking, truck and equipment parking and as a haphazard parking area during large scale special events. As mentioned above, if the requirements from the Coastal Commission for 400 public spaces in exchange for the residential permit parking program can be met without this Greenbelt lot, then Council has more freedom to address the specific parking problems from a community standpoint and to select an alternative that would reduce the space usage on the Greenbelt while serving the facility users in the best way possible. There are any number of options available to shift the parking allocations in the area in order to make the best use of the space and to address the difficulties that have been experienced in the past with regards to parking on the site. As an example, staff would suggest one alternative for Council consideration that would serve to restrict the parking on the Greenbelt during times when impact is low while making it - 2 - ti 'Y4f.iY.CT'i -•••m, • •w1 •M.. available to the public on weekends when the demand for parking is high. The plan would be as follows: Reduce the overall need for parking on the Greenbelt by: (a) Expanding Clark Field parking. With the new basketball courts completed, it is projected that a new parking lot design could accommodate approximately 24 more vehicles (currently the lot accommodates 18 cars). (b) Restriping the existing Greenbelt Parking (adjacent to the Clark Building) to make it 90 degree instead of angle parking could add five (5) spaces to the Clark complex. (c) Replacing 20 spaces of employee parking located on the east side of City Hall with an equal number of spaces in the new Greenbelt Lot (thus opening up more of City Hall parking for library and City Hall visitors). Approve a modified Greenbelt lot: (a) One that would contain a reduced number of spaces (i.e., 30-40) from rendering A. (b) One that would include expanded green areas. Restrict the usage of the Greenbelt lot: (a) Use for employee parking only during the work week (Monday through Thursday permit parking only). (b) Make the lot available for general public use on weekends and for, special events only. (c) Restrict hours of use (a gate that could be locked on the weekends by a designated time might be of assistance). (d) Prohibit commercial vehicle parking on the lot. As previous difficulties with the Greenbelt lot have centered around the types of uses (i.e. overnight parking), restricting parking on Monday through Thursday to permit parking only (employees) would simplify enforcement and would insure that no overnight parking occurred in the area. During weekends, if hours were determined, long term parking would be available but the lot would be closed by a designated hour and all vehicles remaining would be cited and/or removed. This would serve to minimize any doubts about hours of usage and overnight parking. The reduced number of spaces that could be placed on the Greenbelt would enable the City to add to the landscaping to create a buffer around the lot. With attention to the green space and the use of natural materials (no paving), the lot could enhance the beauty of the area while addressing community parking needs. Staff has not prepared any cost estimates for the alternative listed above but with Council direction, will prepare one for this or another selected alternative. Other alternatives available to Council include: (1) Receive and file. (2) Request staff to provide additional information on the alternatives listed above. (3) Suggest another parking alternative. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Memo from LeRoy Staten, General Services 2. Memo from Michael Schubach, Planning Dept. 3. April 14 Council minutes Proposing Public Hearing 4. Letters from the Public . 5. Petition to close Greenbelt Parking Lot 6. Petition to reopen Greenbelt Parking Lot 7. March 24 Council item "Review of the Revised Conceptual Designs for the Greenbelt Parking Lot CIP 91-511" 8. March 24 Council. minutes "Review of Revised Conceptual Designs for the Greenbelt Parking Lot CIP 91-511" 9. Minutes from Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission 10. Planning Commission Minutes of March 3, 1992 11. Map of parking areas Con ur: .A.4a14,w3JE4 Respectfully submitted, .* worsow ' . ;r.'oney, Director ni y Resources Dept. Mary Comm Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager • -LeRoy Staten; 'Interim Director General Services Dept.. Michael Schubach, Director Planning part nt Lynn Terry, Deputy Engineer Public Works Dept. 4 TO: Mary Rooney Director Community Resources FROM: LeRoy Staten General Services RE: Parking Problem resulting from Greenbelt Closure DATE: 5-4-92 nnnnnnnmrnmmnnnnnnnnunnulimmuminumnumiunnnnnnummullummuli mumm Per your request for data regarding the problems we have incurred since the removal of the parking on the greenbelt, I have the following: Since the closure of the greenbelt we have experienced an overwhelming number of cars parked in and around the field at Clark Field. The spaces on Valley Ave. between llth and 8th,are always full. The fact that we have baseball, basketball,and soccer teams, Jazzersize and neighbors of the surrounding areas needing to park, creates bedlam. In our efforts to enforce the violations observed, we have been subjected to harsh criticisms and very little cooperation. We have been forced to cite even though we have tried to use diplomacy. We have been faced with people that have parked their four wheel drive vehicles on the greenbelt and there is nothing we can do because all of the signs that regulate the way vehicles are to park in that area have been taken down. Signs have been posted reading No Parking Beyond This Point, however, its so difficult to cite and or tow the people who own the cars. We are so afraid that if someone is hurt, there will be no way for an emergency vehicle to get to the injured person 5 • TO: FROM: Michael Schubach, P i..M.3,, z,•M+M,•.i111,1 ^Yl CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Mary Rooney, Community Resources Director ector SUBJECT: Coastal Commission Jurisdiction over Greenbelt Parking, and Status of Public Parking at Plaza Hermosa DATE: May 6, 1992 The majority of the Greenbelt is within the Coastal Zone, and whenever there is a change of use within the Coastal Zone, an amendment to the certified Land Use Plan is necessary. Therefore, the parking lot on the Greenbelt will need approval by the Coastal Commission, if it is to be permanently changed to park land. The City will need to submit an application for a use change. The Greenbelt dirt parking lot had been approved as part of the long term remote parking required as part of the preferential parking program by the Coastal Commission. However, according to the Coastal Commission staff, this issue can be resolved by the use of the lower level public parking at the Plaza Hermosa shopping center, although at this time, no formal approval in writing has been provided by the Coastal Commission staff. The City's Planning staff have been assured that the Coastal Commission staff will provide a letter regarding the above noted matters. • It should be noted that the City Attorney is currently investigating the permanency of public parking at Plaza Hermosa. It had been staff's opinion that the parking would be private after 1994. However, staff has not found any evidence of this fact in any of the relevant documents. The loss of public parking at Plaza Hermosa could jeopardize the preferential parking district program. p/memos - 6-- (d) Letter from City Treasurer Gary Brutsch dated March 30,. 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. (e) Letters from Gary W. Brown, 222-1/2 26th St., and Seth Brinks -Brown, 222-1/2 26th St., dated April 2, 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. (f) Letter from Shea McCurdy, 1113 Valley Drive, dated April 4, 1992 re. Greenbelt parking. (g) Letter from Myron and Patricia Gazin, dated April 1992, re. Greenbelt parking. Supplemental letter from Glenn and Susan Davis, dated April 11, 1992 re. Greenbelt parking. Planning Director Schubach and City Attorney Vose re- sponded to Council questions. pefromalimmrsim To set the item for a public hearing for reconsideration of the restriction of parking on the Greenbelt in front of City Hall with the condition that information be included on: 1) the status of the public parking under Vons regard- ing any revisionary rights; and, 2) Coastal Commission concerns/agreement. Motion Midstokke, second Benz. The motion failed due to a subsequent substitute action. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., read and pres- ented a petition with over 250 signatures. requesting the Council to reconsider its deci- sion to close the Greenbelt to parking across from City Hall; Merna Marshall - 360 - 33rd Place, requested the barriers be taken down and the restriction on parking be suspended until a final decision is reached; Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, stated "Robert's Rules of Order" precluded Councilmember Mid- stokke from making a motion on this item since she had been absent from the meeting at which the decision had been made; spoke in favor of open space; City Attorney Vose stated that Councilmember Midstokke could make the motion. Tom Allen - Hermosa Beach, said the decision was made without statistical data; need a study to assess the need for parking in that area; re- quested the Council follow the precedent of Beach Drive and suspend enforcement of parking restrictions; City Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page 7770 - 7 - ,..Y . HERMOSA BEACH LITTLE LEAGUE 710 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 March 26, 1992 Mayor Midstokke and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear City Council: As President of the Hermosa Beach Little League, I am writing this letter on behalf of the parents and children who participate in this worthwhile youth sports activity. The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a major parking problem that has been created with the closure of the parking lot across from City Hall on the greenbelt. It was our understand that this item was on the City Council agenda of March 24, 1992, for the purpose of "review of revised conceptual designs for the greenbelt parking lot, CIP 91-511:' as stated on the published agenda for that meeting. At no time was it made known to the residents who will be adversely affected by this action that closing the parking lot was one of the options included in the "conceptual designs". We were under the assumption that the existing parking lot was going to be landscaped and made attractive. Certainly, from the description on the city council agenda, one would not get the feeling that closing the parking lot was even an option. During the little league baseball season, parking for Clark Stadium and the 'adjoining facilities is at a premium. At any given time there are twelve teams playing and warming up for games --at 10 kids per team that means 120 kids at a time --and most of these kids are accompanied by parents who arrive in a vehicle and need a place to park. These people are forced to compete for parking with basketball players and aerobic exercisers --other worthwhile activities that take place at Clark Field --(not to mention if there is a special function at the Clark Building such as a wedding reception). Even with the parking on the greenbelt open and available, there is still somewhat of a parking problem and many people end up parking in the adjoining residential neighborhoods. But with the parking lot closed, there will be a major impact on the adjoining residential neighborhoods. - 8 - • 4� h • -_- . 9 We respectfully request that this item be placed on an upcoming agenda for reconsideration, in order that the residents who use the park and the adjoining residential neighbors can have a chance to give input prior to any redesigning of this area for permanent closure. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Al entanni President Hermosa Beach Little League • 9 a . . HERMOSA BEACH FRIENDS of the LIBRARY :arch 28, 1992 City Council City of Hermosa each l515 Valley Drive Hermosa Leach, CA 9C25i+ `" i /N. �, . E3 --j MAR 31 1992 -�• City Clint I). City et Hermosa Bosch • ` °)T ::embers of the City Council: A government is the only vessel that leaks from the top: A current example of this is the action of the City Council at its Larch 24, 1992 meeting which closed the public parking area on the greenbelt opposite the Hermosa Eeach City Hall and Library complex. Eack in the mid 196O's when the present City ::all and Library were constructed, the dedicated parking area was quite adequate for the respective staffs and for the patrons and visitors. Today, with the staffs doubled or more than doubled in size, space for parking in tiie vicinity is at a premium. From the civic center growth evolved the actively used, informal, now banned greenbelt parking area...normally a dustbovl in the summer and a mudhole in the winter. During the normal work week, library patrons, less -privileged city staffers, and others have resorted to parking in this city -designated "= ublic :irking" area. '.7ith this parking loss, the Vons lower level parking area 'off Ardmore has been suggested as a substitute. =ublic safety becomes a signifi- cant factor when pedestrians are recuired to navigate the multiple crosswalks through the Fier -Valley -Ardmore intersections. For our Library's older patrons, this alternate parking area is obviously not acceptable. It appears inconsistent with the City's Zoning Ordinance to eliminate public parking on the multi -use greenbelt without ;,roviding a real alternative, when stringent parking requirements are continually imposed on business and residential property owners. Certainly this greenbelt parking could be improved to include paved surface, designated barking spaces, lighting at night, and attractive landscaping, to be compatible both with the overall scheme of the 550 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California 90254 - 10 - fc 213/379-8475 HERMOSA BEACH FRIENDS of the LIBRARY City Council - Page 2 greenbelt parkway and the Coastal Commission requirements. Such improved parking would ce welcomed by the patrons of =ermosa's Civic Theater, Clark Stadium attendees, summer beachgoers, and visitors to the ever popular Fiesta de Artes. Please, Council Members, reconsider your decision to close this badly needed public parking area. Restore it, instead, as a civic asset. Since the Library was not previously informed of this council action, please do the following: (1) Place this letter on your agenda and (2) Schedule an advertised public hearing on this matter at the next available City Council meeting. Si. erely, d;L-4,7exga-----. ohn T. Hales, President Friends of the Library JTH:bd 550 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach: California 90254 A 213/379-8475 - 11 - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY TREASURER RE: REMOVAL OF PARKING FROM THE SANTA FE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY IN FRONT OF CITY HALL DATE: MARCH 30, 1992 My personal belief in 1983, was that parking should not be allowed on the Railroad right of way. However, during Council discussion regarding the Coastal Commission parking requirements and the City's preferential parking plan, the Coastal Commission was told that a total of 400 general public parking spaces were to be provided at six different satellite parking locations. Council majorities have established the Right of Way as one of the six satellite parking locations. This parking plan is a part of our State mandated Coastal Plan. The State approved Coastal Plan gives the City permit authority. My concern's are as follows: • 1. The City has allowed parking on the Right of Way for almost a decade. Where is the City going to provide parking for these displaced vehicles. 2. Has the recent Council action placed the City's preferential parking plan in jeopardy. 3. Will this Council action give the Coastal Commission reason to reject the City's Coastal plan. 4. Ancillary to this Right of Way parking issue is the topic of parking at the Von's shopping center. In 1983 the Council, in resolution 83-4044, established Pacific Coast Highway and Pier in the Hermosa Beach parking authority, allowing general parking behind Marie Callenders restaurant and under the Von's parking lot. This parking is to exist until the the original agreement is changed which has never occurred. - 12 4� d In conclusion, I think the Council acted to remove the parking from the Right of Way based on a deficit of pertinent information. Perhaps an advertised public hearing on this matter would allow the Council an opportunity to explain the wisdom of their decision. Gary Bruts h City Treasurer '7o : CLQ Cotur\Cl.� I-V.13'411k% Gek-r\A.1-. Yo- cLICZS L. re_Vhou-e_ 2 .. kln. front, o r1L .e 1 L QV' mrnwrt �LS CoL�5.4.. Clan -L St .e - Gve._.was co marts , ancl. nQ.u3- basKe-6ath courts., S oCus- °axe( b aseholL 5iDoetS ti mo'LR. C.ltt? c vz Cvutrt- t 1.s ckci:stmc` kap 6-Lhe_it Vocal r o‘ScQ.. oacr�.q �r`�C'�-c- 6 L± 1 I h1 v\O tv\t-e , -jr' tC�au re.+move sickc_47s O,ccZSS . ✓ D-12.ccsLomas o th:Ls Rtinick skYtad.6.e. vae- 6 -.sore.. atn_-roam. Cttt�Qnr Jam. c_cu or �1G f 1m_ tIs �(�t(f\ rift e SCT thtre 1s nct a601.Ze waL 6-e_ ctts tu-sseci a re ,caws te_r . its se -ix ,Cs \flu') rte VAR_ r0Lem_ �reg� - tits �- kroa-rrL cd: e rvtio5aVaILL5 S c,'o L . ? V -las)? e.a15-cd. Ca.r X2W . *. 2 l ��r� 1-krW`c s c� e c-111. - 14 - Ci� • �'��\ "2 Z-2-7--4: (A07_5--\\ r1 / ``i` / 1 e i�zc.► j 10 A Or. _f POp`��`r "� 1g'(�, Q��' �1h)h ..s A1/41,1 re,Grie 04Q.. . -1/417.0.s 2 f c -KAN3 p:Ll Pcfz). Sid Z. V,f.0 4.3.\t,;_ ' P4`;,,,J S (%:2= ° •v\ � Pka A` 7.(4\--:-t‘ Gu t .c f e '1'a e r ( 4'-07,c `�..- .1 'A A°revs., 5 ( c \ .-Th„c`�.r., 1— �c\,„Q., kt Fl 1 119 5k 14.1 ($- Oiljr:Q_ ".S::-‘11‘ PU ►", c; arc1; Aclaq,� . -15- .n. .....,r-.,_. 1113 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 April 4, 1992 The Honorable Robert Essertier, Mayor and City Council Members Hermosa Beach City Council 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mayor and Honorable Council Members: RECEIVED APR 0 7 1992 CITY MGR. CFcICE I am 11 years old, a student at Hermosa Valley School, a player in the Hermosa Beach Little League and our family is one of the sponsors of my team, the "Twins". My Father and I decided to check the parking situation at Clark Stadium for you today. We first checked at 9AM and found lots of parking everywhere, except on the greenbelt and in the Clark Stadium parking lot. Since there were so many spaces available, we decided not to bother to count the available parking spaces again until around 11AM. At 11AM, I counted the following: - Greenbelt (in front of Clark): - Clark Stadium (by GSA Bldg): 3 - Clark Building lot: 0 spaces - Ardmore (between Pier and 8th): - City Hall lot: 24 spaces - Mini -storage lot: 24 spaces - Under Von's lot: 135 spaces - Community Center: 47 spaces - Alano parking lot: 10 spaces 0 spaces spaces 28 spaces The total number of public parking spaces we saw which were available and close to Clark Stadium at 11AM was 271 spaces. tI1jr I hope this report is of help to you. Sincerely, Shea H. McCurdy - 16 - 4' F • RECEIVED Ari 0 8 1992 CITY MGR. OFFICE April 7, 1992 City Council of Hermosa Beach Madame and Gentlemen: I think you were not fully aware of the vital importance of the green strip area at Pier Ave. and Valley as a public use. This area was never intended to be used exclusively as a park. The public depends on it for parking space too. Even temporarily closing this area from parking accommodation is a disservice to the users of the library, city hall and recreation areas. Closing it off permanently would be a foolish flouting of public opinion. I think you may by now be aware that this prohibition is not popular. Please reconsider this hasty, unheralded, unwelcome change. Re -open the green strip to parking. Cordially Myron and Patricia A. Gazin 7vl -Y7- • 3JPPLEPMMENTAL INFORMATION AP, -J \\ \C\�a Atj,,-r, - u . �,c. C\c\ Q& CCu.3.;-nLSl CZE. - GAsal-rN\ P A c•9>: Q.) XS& -\X-\•&-7'1\ ZZNA.S.A.D .e.2a..7stN C:\. SLY \L•VitikAj . vc yz!,1Fr Q,1\ CINC (VISA-Sn ck.c\S`cme Sgk. %.5§3...\ QS -tag:\ LA -J63'- f\S-Cy S'r)•,6L.)\(\kM\ )&&1\k'f• VNr\ t)..ao. W-AL0k4N LZ•1\\,ta.V..64 Ca';11-k•- OS(Nk •C\I.Z•As -tQLO -t)\\14Lk C,CLIAMCA to.vt .AfS„C SktZ0.."1\ - etst._) 59 - -rtN G. . - 19 - Jim Lissner 2715 El Oeste Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 376-4626 April 27, 1992 City Council City of Hermosa Beach City Hall Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Greenbelt parking, Public Hearing of May 12 Honorable Councilmembers: RECEIVED APR 3 0 1992 CITY MGR. OFFICE The parking lot on the greenbelt adjacent to city hall must be re -opened or the people will perish. NOT! My argument as to why we don't need yet another lot is laid out in a letter I wrote to the Easy Reader, attached. But can you keep this superfluous lot shut without the Coastal Commission sanctioning you? YES! The 40 to 80 public spaces planned for South Park, plus another 10 along the north edge of Clark field, will easily make up for the loss of the 53 on the Greenbelt. Please stand your ground. SAVE THE GREENBELT! Regards, - 20 - SUPPLEMENTAL' INFORMATION Jim Lissner 2715 El Oeste Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 376-4626 April 20, 1992 Editors Easy Reader 832 Hermosa Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Editors: In Hermosa Beach, there is enough public parking within 1 block of Clark Stadium and the library: 194 spaces under and around Vons, 174 around the Community Center, 93 around City Hall, and 119 around Clark Field. A total of 580 spaces! Why do we need to give up part of the Greenbelt just to get 53 more spaces? We have much more parking than Manhattan, which has only 479 spaces (including the three-level structure) serving its comparable area running from the library to Live Oak Park. Originally, in March, the Hermosa council refused to formalize the then existing Greenbelt lot and closed it, but 30+ Little League parents and Friends of the Library came to the April 14 meeting and won a new hearing on the issue. Citizens who want a green Greenbelt must come to this hearing, on May 12, and support the council in their original decision - or we will have another parking lot. Sincerely, Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 404 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 May 7, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Removal of Parking on Hermosa Valley Greenbelt Dear Mayor and Council Members: The Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce is opposed to the removal of parking from the greenbelt. Removal of the parking will adversely affect business owners along Pier Avenue and in the entire downtown area. The businesses in the downtown area benefit from the greenbelt parking spaces in at least two ways: 1) beach visitors who park on the greenbelt do not take up vital parking places in Lots A, B and C, and (2) beach visitors who walk from the greenbelt to the beach tend to patronize the businesses on Pier Avenue on their way to and from the beach. A reduction in the number customers and sales in the downtown business area will result from the removal of parking on the greenbelt and will cause a corresponding reduction in sales tax revenue to the City. The businesses along upper Pier Avenue also benefit from the greenbelt parking spaces. Many of these businesses have little on site parking and utilize the greenbelt for employee parking in order to free the parking spaces along Pier Avenue for customers. Residents also benefit from the extra street parking. Please consider too that the business owners of downtown Hermosa Beach and the upper Pier Avenue area have contributed substantial sums toward the acquisition of the greenbelt through the payment of the Utilities User Tax. The Chamber of Commerce urges you to help our business community by providing as many parking spaces as possible on the greenbelt. Co dially, /, Wesle /I . Bu§ Execu ive Director w ^tia .r-• +r,,.w*tic-�' •r.+r. �F r: 142 Monterey Boulevard Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 372-3619 May 6, 1992 HONORABLE ROBERT ESSERTIER, MAYOR MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL .CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Ladies and Gentlemen: Once again I find myself in the middle of the political arena. Apparently, there has come a voice that says the shortage for parking is so critical that we should consider causing great damage to one of the most unique characteristics of Hermosa Beach. This Greenbelt area, as it exists now, offers all those who use it a much needed respite from a congested area. To violate this truly fine area would set a precedent whereby this land could be modified as the political climate might dictate. Please allow me to voice my opinion and the opinion of many others who have signed the petitions which I forward to you at this time. There will never be enough parking and there will always be a great need for open space in this small and congested community. Please consider these points when you are making your decision. Please note that these signatures were obtained by myself and a friend in a very short period of time. It is only a very small sampling of the potential total vote condemning this issue. - 21 - WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, DO NOT WANT ANY PARKING ON THE GREENBELT. 1. NAME -LJ 25ESS 44141,6(74 2. /Ai NA' 4 51 Vo_9111 bi- lit 3. 171aZ A A-4-1 /y2 -)‘(1:,2L7 tlaA (IR* 1 ttZ RriA, 8c.t Pet 6 3d nifdo, g. 1\f,,L, Co 30 Ayz.41-‘,.4.--cf,\l'E--HG 7. 6642. 31u ctAlre.r c+ g 4. 5. 6. 8. 10. 11. 12. 14. 15. /5 4tetz, ' 6 31 tre firein;tscuLi 4 It 2rf (44QA P. 05/, 17fit Petitions must be turned no later than May 5, 1992. When completed, please call Gene Spencer at 372-3619. - 22 - 1 "4^ `- •- �ir..+.yw+rrer*.rr:.»; +—•' .k. •-••.-,••••-0.... -4 r WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, DO NOT WANT ANY, PARKING ON THE GREENBELT. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. NAME ADDRESS )"'• outiz it it Cy," Alii / / `u'°s,i- IM ',u., c4 i Oc.. , lige 4 W1S l-te,c. M0 4 ate}-R.:.r✓ e:';-epee„i, 6.35 4N i-k►ZaM bsra- p A.a 64 4.4] IT35 ??1 ,ete&-el %/&.772.-Ati 7. Q'Jiu� 7pm-m,`. 531 �� S-� j• 8. 71,z /ke, 9. 10. 11. 321, of 12. L .' r ¶ C &ar t c��c► 375— iv60 5v r h E,ec3 - Vic, itt- ) 13. %detna ChGrTkr\u,'n 14. %37 7,e — --- .�- 15. ii fr?3 ?rzsi Petitions must be turned no later than May 5, 1992. When completed, please call Gene Spencer at 372-3619. '4 • — 23 4 WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, DO NOT WANT ANY PARKING ON THE GREENBELT. NAME 1. D�i Wan 3. l�Z- 4 . a/efiz,/ .ADDRESS �7 /7/ /yr/Lbb�r/ Sy` ,/P. ,fas,.; ,a° ci%' -:EJ L were 5. 8. 9. / a (J O q 54-. c 10.�. _�E --� _/� `-'tel o 970--4 14. 15. 3y 0 syT .si Atli Win/ 'Lifo-rit 45mAzz) w7 2re.S T S Petitions must be turned no later than May 5, 1992. When completed, please call Gene Spencer at 372-3619. - 24- • • .h WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, DO NOT WANT ANY PARKING ON THE GREENBELT. 1. 2. 3. NAME .ADDRESS 1 t \ 1tv2� S . P--12r'1Q S`t`'`'s 4 (1)5lam-, i /La/LI 4. AAAC%vt � !k(`_f 5. 6. 7. 8.4 9. `f.)0 5J ie.A." 4-44k - $0 2`‹. - 3/0,7/5 f\11.)(-0-,p4v-v-- 641 St 112' 10. %�, c. kw( • 674,c g.:7. g -23i ot4k_t } s�� 11. 'c-:._-NrA-- 1...irlet. L Co 3 S t 01v% .4- y rS eht J;/:1 6 Y 6 ,,z� 2,67. 6'r /csz /Y C4 12. 13. 'P An/ 14. AA 15e. tA taCn 4- ki-10 15. C'l�. ,r��r��u��1��c� Ilii it 0 Petitions must be turned no later than May 5, 1992. When completed, please call Gene Spencer at 372-3619. - 25 - f tr WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, DO NOT WANT ANY PARKING ON THE GREENBELT. 1. NAME ADDRESS MAR_IE 5 WATE-k. )L(441 Pi. 14- 6 2. 14j/h-D4D kt4. S-- 4-11 I itg A5- Alq fr2/q/W-474/L--Zav gAyv641 917,5-7 4. G. Ki&16SINRY 5. tAnnalk-OC G5--sv c/o 6' 43, /tot -- 7. ie 8. yeer 0$A_ -b it( rviv, 4- fkoe..--T4-6 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Petitions must be turned no later than May 5, 1992. When completed, please call Gene Spencer at 372-3619. 26 -' WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, DO NOT WANT ANY PARKING ON THE GREENBELT. NAME ADDRESS 1. u,e-kat..)pt.)JtL 2. 3. g. 4. 5. 2.29 Vox2I-/ H T"C A 413 6. CZ Pvt.AA 2-19 'Will br' 7. ,Aa/ gN P. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. uA) icck •?-r-fr/: //A /4ZZ4y Petitions must be turned no later than May 5, 1992. When completed, please call Gene Spencer at 372-3619. - 27 - • • e. • „ yew . o%.1cr.",,tek 27,4,41 .*Ves. . . •41 r ' ti WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, DO NOT WANT ANY PARKING ON THE GREENBELT. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. r ao - /1,, mAxi/d7r,4.0 4-a A6 6 . 41. aa'A -(040 t), e— 9. � 04 4_, iIi3 n'/evrQic�ctilr/C S-Thcr\-fr\Q-LL }VoiksW-Ai 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Ar Petitions must be turned no later than May 5, 1992. When completed, please call Gene Spencer at 372-3619. - 28 - /tom... � 7�►.✓-V.wL.4..� ♦ • I .. PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NAME & SIGNATURE is7--t -6. 4: •".., THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. ADDRESS /C!- 76, /0:N S%a'cci N.2S 77,Z.- �- •! 4. /-)/ 7 C'. /Di2 e Are 11-4. - 29 - 3-28-92 4•.+i4 i s-' +�...1 r --'*i t.01.12`-41,•••--11•••••••1 • . « ..••. - • .• •••••.•4•0•"...71.• PETITION iwn-r- PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USER. OF THE CREENB :LT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL C,ECfgr; TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE CUUN+"" LL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF :1::E OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE I:+ ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNC iL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE IT;.:M CN ORDEk TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NAME & SIGNA `\M�GYJSl L cl7e/45 T NK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. ADDRESS 3SL111 aA.10Q fir. #1-366- 746- Z7-23 p ' ,- dz. l 7 Era_ Vet l ley 1 r c I've • J4 a _1) T << 17 fig QQ --�-�_ --��=- 9a2-17 I 20 1- Peosec 4--11 bz H4 • ci 2 r 57 fig 7-6101- y - 30 • 3-28-92 PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER '10 ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NAME & SIGZIATURE (1r lee l 24.2 amp } K YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. ADDRESS - 31 - 3-28-92 • PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE CREENBELI' PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY CCt1NCIi. DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPET NOTICE Its ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST T4E COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE iTE: t 'N ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. • L;4: ;t i L q"..7 .1/ ADDRESS 2.O5 jJs:WEj\ 37 sr 171 X1_' ile144- d-Ve 53 3- Z_./ t - )-i-_ L3 K' T j '1"moi ;/ ) ro }La . t �� THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. a /1 7 '7 23',- 26.-r 2 c.;/` /V1 IE. . 1 7- A ?- 3-? /t' / L =3 7 - - 32- 3-28-92 PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENC1 OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN LR: ^ T') ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. N4iME & SIGNATURE ADDRESS `fad 46 319- 314. kport c,:„a & I i Am. p.eEw f�4abci O✓zGco-- -� Ld '"� 110: I r 1,L € /_s f THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. ao`'2 Qc, 4/'S jc, -? n ,;fig_ 2,(Q 5T',L_ -� 53ei Seconal.. • I% A5' 1301 G' )r o./1 f /4 /632 1`77- - 33 - 3-28-92 PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THF. CRRENBEI.T PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NAME §1 SIGNATL RE -441111INIPIPL Vet .1e...„ OD am/ .rAtLje.& , ' THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTINTION. ADDRESS L C�0-(xL .13.? ftsp.c-sio 120; -- - s�-� //gee - (7/4 /g« -'7i4 ,aa .1.g.Z.Y4512.1_5ZZI /1,0 - otee- fi1�� _ifs �- ' V.Le _ t_i/Z5 eta nn • - 34 - J 3-23-92 PETITION TO RE—OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKINC LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENEELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROrti NOTICE IN ORDER 10 ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE RFQIJEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NAME & SIGNATbJRE , .(41.11S1 -a! 1 • Aid c?a al.CAZ.LL /27LthAL THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. ADDRESSA/C iiiz7 leezi-_46_41-4/ vvAA t a� 3 1Za1 ,Z323 w °I021 . _EBeie0718/ 6,21c,Act 42.s--rtt -orr c_? 9'aSet y 6f3 /.0 ��,; 17 )1 L . Llida- - 90.7-6C 11. 24: AI 9°2:76 25( - .G.Aer109.1 EtIA 9OaSci _.1).2__Intiii2440121-4-44.446AerNioset. 3)9 1f2t P 12aea fir. 4- 426. m9n-/hrn;'4-v 96Z� _Et._1_51314__SEr4L. 5crisl /271, iMtzifyiWg- 3-28-92 35 - 0.1~e•4c,I-, " +N+'•!•--. _ _ *.^,.+.".'.r'.."u." ► ` '"��"er?w9'.'Y'.p•s-yr°wp�an.+ .7w►ee.++ .:rt;wC' PETITION TO RE—OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GkEENi Lr PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CTTY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUN('.IL ACTED) WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATLON AS TO THE FREQUENCY OI -UL'E OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOT':CE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THF CLOSURE. WE REQUEST ? ! t I: CO[: N" s f. SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECIS.ON, AND REHEAR TUE ITFM IN OPPP TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NA SIGNATURE ADDRESS 52 GJ�J� _L2 2J4w & 18e 8 U' (Jv't'. 1� .171& ')i .'.y'_��s$f caSiarL 11/7 C/A' /7 • /3 Jf�U(i);( z1n) THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. - 36 • PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NAMX & SIGNATUR • 'L( Y1+UR ATTENTION. ADDRESS / l _1' ? /x_13_._ 41)kk_ -.c 1 ,c)c L: 1100 ciivItem k s_ 11� 3 ///g :4 320 -7 V2 ?‘-‘ tki l rileT _51) Ian ' -- fr e - 37 - PETITION TO RE—OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF Tf{1-: '.:i<EENEi L,i' PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNC: L DECISLuN TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE CO(_ NC IL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF U':E OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE 1 N OR()Eil 1'; ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST C'Hc: CoUNt' SET ASIDE THE EARLIER Di.CISION, AND REHEAR THE t`rl:"1 fN Gi:1r:.< TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NAME & SIGNATURE %J 1 J / / A"DRESS /VG1"""r -Zed_ __ •�� i %J��N 3y-4----- 2;)yf�t111i - T :ihG �In r � /Hp ..J 2,-(j7 531. At 7 /i.e. 4 c./71-n4A4,/ i w �, Ei ji} �v N T NK YOB FO'h YOUR ATTENTION. (z 4 _7_ p` 2,,,1-8 PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. N E & SIGNATURE ADDRESS / C.-F- L/1g .i 1g ' �T 841 44/ f 7'4(- /44e.60-- . Z.21 7 53-5_ - ZD'C- 57L' 1Z. /3. 6o Pre/e— *4) H Z�- Z -Y ST K6 -� --- - \ O) , \ d s1- vv3 I 127 1SA-v usr..3S;)•:l / t G/.5 /1,lo.S,Pdzd- ,` / .�. 2,o3 fvi.�(,f 1/i a' 7 sr Ham C�- tea' Ili ►ss- Pt , 11.S. /,Zia / THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. - 39 - 3-28-92 PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE iwcPwurr. Ll PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE IT'E'M IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NAME & SI,GNATURE KHTNc.Etrt. •r• 7.40rtG •<-'-K'Y T JJ _� NcY Lef-te,ur .& • f?: L 777'7- 1' ADDRESS , -9616.0t-=a=L.,4Ye-4fL Wig•-r•�� La- aL 9c4'1' 909 /4,77/ s77 Mcrwesq &4. 162- r7 4P 7 /WI- . 20 a341 / �L �'�I -*IMP 44,27ZJ Q Pub 900.5Y f . S. c ; v %2 Os2 / 7-g� riARP A7 Nc+F,"-i THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. 3-28-92 - 40 - PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT[' PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCTT. nPrTcrny TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEET, THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAn THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NAME. & SIGNAT'; RE �C THAPJK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. ADDRESS/ /- L - 9 C 144- f' c(.ce_L 146 1a eg 11_3_62V,121_(Z.Liise 1kk.c4. a o z sy te. /*° e - "./E4 _ _ _ar c 51 • l r ✓�r o G_ 1570 exLdl,7% �-- sy (11-k S+. ss ► z*20 cr NIS, - 41 - 3-38- PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CITY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL THAT THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPE•t NOTICE IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WI, REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN C^LD' TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. NA & SIGNATJ,Jr�164,1 g yysc)-/J- I35 /'t;Q, igt.__t(-.. . _1) (C - to sr, z2 H1(mac( , THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. 3-28-q2 - 42 - PETITION TO RE -OPEN THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT WE CITIZENS OF HERMOSA BEACH AND USERS OF THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT ARE UPSET OVER THE RECENT CTTY COUNCIL DECISION TO CLOSE THE LOT PERMANENTLY. WE FEEL TH\T THE COUNCIL ACTED WITHOUT PROPER INFORMATION AS TO THE FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE LOT BY LOCAL RESIDENTS, AND WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE IN OHu=i, TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSURE. WE REQUEST THE COUNCIL SET ASIDE THE EARLIER DECISION, AND REHEAR THE ITEM IN ORDER TO ACCEPT PUBLIC TESTIMONY. �..iE & SIGNAT ADDRESS �. .2c5 Z1'''= `St. //.,B . THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION. 3-28-92 - 43 - k March 18, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 24, 1992 REVIEW OF THE REVISED CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS FOR THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT CIP 91-511 Recommendation: 1. That the City Council review the latest conceptual designs for the Greenbelt parking lot along with the recommendations from the Parks, Recreation & Community Resources Advisory Commission and the Planning Commission. 2. That the City Council instruct staff as to which concept to use in the design of the Greenbelt parking lot. 3. That Concept "A" be the approved plan for the parking lot because it appears to have the highest level of acceptability. Background: The City Council requested that the Parks, Recreation & Community Resources Advisory Commission and the Planning Commission both review the latest designs for the Greenbelt parking lot and make recommendations to the City Council. The Parks, Recreation & Community Resources Advisory Commission (PRCRAC) reviewed the five (5) conceptual design drawings at their meeting on February 26, 1992. In addition the Commission considered the "No Parking Lot" alternative and a reduced size lot located north of the south line of the self storage lot. The commission voted to recommend concept "A" as the preferred design. A copy of the minutes is attached. The Planning Commission reviewed the five (5) conceptual design drawings at their meeting on March 3, 1992. The commission considered all seven (7) alternatives considered by the PRCRAC and voted to recommend Concept "A" with a possible reduction to approximately 54 parking spaces at the City Council's discretion. This number of spaces is based on the Coastal Commission required parking of 119 spaces on the overall Greenbelt area in conjunction with the Preferential Parking District. See attached Map. The commission made additional suggestions which are stated in the commission minutes. A copy of the minutes is attached. Analysis: The analysis of the design differences between all five conceptual plans is provided in the report that went to the City Council at the meeting of October 22, 1991. A copy of that report is attached for review. The five colored conceptual - 44 - design drawings will also be available at the City Council meeting for review. The parking demand study that was conducted during February by the General Services Department is attached for review. The City Public Works staff recommended Concept "B" in the report on October 22, 1991. That recommendation was based on providing the maximum number of parking spaces with the highest level of safety. However, it appears that Concept "A" is the recommended choice by both commissions and therefore the Public Works staff recommendation is to also accept Concept "A" at this time. If a future City Council is of the opinion that additional parking is needed, Concept "A" could be expanded to Concept "B" at a low cost. The Public Works staff feels that all of the suggestions made by both commissions are useful. Therefore, the staff intends to follow those suggestions in the design of the parking lot as close as possible unless revised by the City Council. Recent changes that have already occurred at the Greenbelt parking lot include the following actions by the Public Works staff. 1. The existing parking area has been covered with natural chipped material from cuttings in the City's parks and landscaped areas. 2. The southerly entrance has been blocked off and a concrete curb with landscaping has been installed. 3. The new sign has been installed at the northerly entrance to the parking lot which states the new rules for use of the lot. Respectfully submitted, Tti Lynn Terry P.E. Deputy City Engineer Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager pworks/pcsrgrb Concur: arl Malone P.E. Director of Public Works 'o• - , Director of ity Resources - 45 - Planning Director people preferred to park in an open lot rather than a parking structure; Robert Udovich - Brooklyn Brick Oven Pizza, requested answers to his questions; and, Jack Hawkins - Vice President of Vons Companies, Inc., stated that Vons would pay for the restriping of the parking lot; and the City should allow the market place to dictate the question of competition. The public hearing was closed at 10:37 P.M. City Attorney Vose stated that a business license did not vali- date a zoning use or a building use. Action: To deny the appeal, sustain the Planning Com- mission decision, and adopt Resolution No. 92-5529, en- titled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO SUSTAIN THE PLANNING COM- MISSION DECISION TO DENY A PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW PARKING REQUIREMENTS TO BE CALCULATED PURSUANT TO SECTION 1170 THEREBY DENYING THE REQUEST TO ALLOW DELIVERY FROM A PIZZA RESTAURANT ("ROUND TABLE PIZZA") INSIDE A GROCERY MARKET ("VOLAS") AT 715 PIER AVENUE IN THE PLAZA HERMOSA SHOPPING CENTER." Motion Wiemans, second Edgerton. The motion carried unanimously, noting the absence of Mayor Midstokke. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. REVIEW OF REVISED CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS FOR THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT, CIP 91-511. Memorandum from Public Works Director Carl Malone dated March 18, 1992. Supplemental letter from Jim Lissner, 2715 El Oeste Drive, dated March 22, 1992. Deputy City Engineer Terry presented the staff report, described the five renderings, and responded to Council questions. Planning Director Schubach responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, responded to Council questions regarding the Planning Com- mission recommendations; Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, questioned why the lower parking level at Hermosa Plaza was not signed as public parking; objected to park- ing on the Greenbelt; Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, questioned noticing of the Greenbelt; considered Coastal Commission issue a ruse; objected to parking on the Greenbelt; and, City Council Minutes 03-24-92 Page 7748 Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, objected to parking on the Greenbelt. Proposed Action: To sign the lot below Vons as public parking. Motion Benz. The motion was withdrawn. Proposed Action: To send the matter back to staff to bring back before the Council as no parking except in front of Clark Stadium. Motion Benz. The motion was withdrawn. Action: To restrict parking on the Greenbelt except for existing parking across from Clark Stadium; and request staff to move the signs restricting parking hours and oversized vehicles to the parking garage in the lower level of Plaza Hermosa Shopping Center. Motion Benz, second Mayor Pro Tempore Essertier. The motion carried unanimously, noting the absence of Mayor Midstokke. Proposed Action: To return to staff to start reviewing a landscape plan for the area. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion was withdrawn when Community Resources Director Rooney stated there would be no problem with a landscape design. 8. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF AGREEMENT FOR INSPECTION AND CON- TRACT ADMINISTRATION, SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION, CIP 88-406. Memorandum from Public Works Director Carl Ma- lone dated March 13, 1992. Action: To continue this item to the meeting of April 14, 1992. Motion Mayor Pro Tempore Essertier, second Benz. So ordered. The meeting recessed at 11:21 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 11:30 P.M. At 11:30 P.M. the order of the agenda was moved to item 12(a). 9. MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION FEE ASSESSMENTS FOR TRANSPOR- TATION/AIR QUALITY RELATED ACTIVITIES OF LOCAL GOVERN- MENT (ASSEMBLY BILL 2766), with ordinance for introduc- tion. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 17, 1992. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 92-1066. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion carried unani- mously, noting the absence of Mayor Midstokke. City Council Minutes 03-24-92 Page 7749 ---SIESTA DE LAS ARTES 1992 USE OF SOUTH SCHOOL SITE FOR EXHIBITOR'�� AND--S.UCTATOR PARKING DURING BOTH FIESTA EVENTS. Motion: "To ove staff recommendation and the request from the Chamber o .mmerce to utilize t outh School site for parking during the Fies - .eekends." irce/Crecy Ayes: Peirce, Crecy, Blaco, ; Abstain: McCurdy Motion: "To allow ove ght parking o - isans only on the Greenbelt parkin: - ea (security provided by -sta staff) adjacent to ' y Hall for the May '92 Fiesta and • ward to Council •r final aproval." Blaco/Peirce; Ayes: Crec? Pe.ice, B1--.; Noes: Reviczky; Abstain: McCurdy REVIEW OF THE REVISED CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT. Motion: "To accept concept "A" as conceptual design and forward to Planning Commission for approval, noting to use only a natural surface for the parking area and to put entrance at 11th Place. Reviczky/Blaco;? Ayes: Crecy, Blaco, Peirce, Reviczky; Noes: McCurdy Note: Commissioner Reviczky expressed kudos to staff for their work on the renderings. Public Input: Jim Lissner suggested the parking spaces be angled toward NW and stricter time limits be put on the southern most spaces to avoid lengthy parking in front of residences. ''STAFF REPORT Com` ity Center gymnasium lighting. Note: Staf, will determine present level of lighting i he gym and report bac to the Commission. Note: Commissioner Reviczky will research alternative lighting resources that will be' cmpatible with exi s-fng system but will also lighten the gym. Note: A public hearing to discus -the South School Master Plan will be scheduled for Monday, April 7 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. OTHER MATTERS Commissioner McCtSrdy was concerned with the drainagesbetween the basketball courts and tennis courts at Clark -field. ADJOURNMENT: 10:26 p.m. - 48 - -2-26-92 Commission rats and future applications should be allowed the same privileges a those that have already built. She supported this application. Neil Gill, 4627 162th Street, Lawndale, Hermosa Beachproperty owner, described the remodeling Ms. Paul wished to compete. He stated Mr. Woods' garage was located adjacent to where.,Ms. Paul was proposing to "remodel and described the issues of contention and dispute between Ms. Paul and Mr. Woods. Leo Woods spoke again and refuted Mr. Gill's ..statements. Hearing closed by Vice-Chmn.. Marks at 9:11 p.m. Comm. Merl supported the application as he felt it was reasonable and did not intensify the use, tri' -which Comm. Di Monda agreed. MOTION by Comm. Merl, seconded by Comm. Di Monda, to APPROVE NR 92-1, allowing an addition and remodel to,a nonconforming duplex in an R-1 zone;at 729 Longfellow Avenue. AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Merl NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Ccmm. Suard and Chmn. Ketz and Vice-Chmn. Marks Vice- hmn. Marks noted this issue may be appealed before the City Cocil. REVIEW OF THE REVISED CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS FOR THE GREENBELT PARKING LOT CIP 91-511. Recommended Action: To review alternative designs and make recommendation to the City Council. Mr. Terry, using renderings, presented the five plans brought back for review, referenced the Staff Report, page 7,. Conceptual Design Data break down and explained each of the concepts.. Vice-Chmn. Marks asked if any changes or revisions had been made to the original plans, to which Mr. Terry stated the first three plans were prepared by a landscape architect and had not been modified. However, Staff had prepared two additional proposals; Concept A and Concept B. Mr. Terry stated Concept A showed 75 parking spaces, one entrance, existing trees in existing locations and preservation of the trees and a landscaped area serving as a divider. This concept was recommended by Parks and Recreation. He stated Concept B is similar to Concept A except it provided a second parking row, increasing the parking to 130 spaces and decreasing the greenbelt area by a dimension of 15 feet to a width of 45 feet. He stated the total width of the greenbelt between Valley and Ardmore Avenues is 100 feet, total. Mr. Terry explained the City Council had requested the plan return to Parks and Recreation and the Planning Commission for review in more detail. He stated the Parks and Recreation Staff made three recommendations: (1) driveway be relocated to the Valley Drive and llth Place intersection, (2) surface of the proposed parking lot should be constructed -of natural materials to meet the requirements - 49 - P.C.Minutes 3/3/92 of the Public Works Department, and (3) the existing oleanders should be retained if at all possible, but trimmed to meet oven space and safety requirements. Comm. Di Monda opposed trimming based upon residents' responses and objected to this issue's continual return to the Commission. Mr. Terry stated this recommendation issued from Parks and Recreation Department Staff. Comm. Merl confirmed with Mr. Terry that the entrance relocation was in order to facilitate a stop sign at the entrance inter- section. He then discussed the parking survey results and noted it displayed only local parking needs, not summer -time requirements. Mr. Terry stated his purpose was to obtain and relay the Commis- sion's comments to the City Council. Vice -Chinn. Marks and Comm. Di Monda questioned how a budget was established when materials had not yet been defined and noted the wide cost ranges between the concepts. Mr. Terry stated the same type of materials were used in all five phases but did not address financial questions. Vice-Chmn. Marks discussed the parking requirements generated by the basketball courts with Mr. Terry, who noted the courts were exceptionally well received within the community. Vice-Chmn. Marks commented the different plans display parking capacity up to 135 spaces and asked the criteria, to which Mr. Terry responded the architect was limited to the area dimensions, not the number of parking spaces. Mr. Schubach stated Staff's concept was to maximize the number of parking spaces within the area and still maintain a useful greenbelt area or to maximize the amount of greenbelt area while maintaining an optimum parking level (75 spaces). Mr. Richard McCurdy stated the Parks and Recreation Commission basically. reviewed and discussed the five proposed plans, the majority of Commissioners choosing Plan A as the best solution from the offered plans. He stated the Commission had discussed the closure of several businesses which resulted in the parking space need being substantially reduced, closure of the llth Street entrance to the greenbelt area, a vehicle -size limitation of 6,000 pounds to eliminate campers, trucks, trailers, etc., the number of parking spaces actually necessary, the ability to adjust the number of parking spaces within the greenbelt area with temporary barriers and the height of the oleanders. He stated the local residents wish the oleanders to remain at their current height to block lighting, noise and dirt. However, the Commission agreed the oleanders should be reduced in height to enhance parking enforce- ment and safety. Mr. McCurdy stated relocation of the entrance was based upon a need for increased safety and reduction of vehicle speed and commented that Commission has wished to keep the area as natural as possible by the use of wood chips or equivalent within'the parking area. Vice-Chmn. Marks then discussed the option of additional exits with Mr. McCurdy, who responded the objective was to leave as much park area as possible, with attention to safety resulting in a four-way stop at the recommended exit. Vice-Chmn. Marks did not feel one exit for 130 cars was safe or efficient. Comm. Merl noted the recommended parking amount was 75 cars and discussed safety in exiting, noting cross -exiting would be hazardous and detrimental to the greenbelt. - 50 - P.C.Minutes 3/3/92 Mr. Schubach stated the minimum size lot that would be approved by the Coastal Commission would be 54 spaces with 65 spaces in another area. He discussed future parking space loss and the required preparation to resolve the future problem. Comm. Di Monda suggested a plan offering 54 parking spaces resulting in more greenbelt area, pulling the parking area away from the residential area. He suggested the Commission forward a recommendation to the Council which would provide it with design guidelines independent upon the lot size. Comm. Merl stated he wished to maintain the concept of parking.on one side as in Concept A, with a variable number of parking spaces, allowing more open space, which he felt was crucial, to which Comm. Di Monda agreed. Comm. Di Monda felt the Commission should make its recommendation. The Council would then review and make recommendations, which would then determine the design guidelines. Comm. Merl agreed. Hearing opened by Vice-Chmn. Marks at 9:46 p.m. A Betty Martin, 257 27th Street, stated she used the parking lot once a week. She stated the parking lot in front of City Hall is usually full due to ordinary City business being conducted. She stated if the City is trying to obtain and retain businesses, common sense must be used regarding preferential and public parking. Howard Longacre, 1221 7th Place, asked if signs indicating hearings being held had been posted in the greenbelt. He felt the desire to have a parking lot came from "special interests" and not residents. He felt the basketball courts were not necessary received and asked who was using the courts. He also felt the oleander issue needed more review prior to any action being taken and the Coast Commis- sion issue was a smoke screen. He suggested that people pay to park and that Vons parking lot Be used, adding that underground parking could be built under the tennis courts. Hearing closed by Vice-Chmn. Marks at 9:55 p.m. Vice-Chmn. Marks suggested the Commission list their concerns for presentation to the City Council. He commented upon the lack of parking criteria, feeling the designer should be supplied with firm parking space figures. Comm. Merl felt that not more than one-third of the width should be committed to parking and stated any proposal with more would be unacceptable to him. He stated the footprint that is decided upon will dictate the number of spaces. He commented upon the parking study, feeling it was not a true picture of the situation due to the time at which it was conducted, but did not feel that more than 75 spaces were necessary. Comm. Di Monda asked if a public hearing would be held, to which Mr. Terry responded he did not believe this capital improvement item would be listed as a public hearing. Mr. Lee noted the capital improvement budget had been approved previously; this was an implementation project not requiring a noticed public hearing. Comm. Di Monda commented upon the need for public hearings for small projects but not for a City project of this magnitude, - 51 - P.C.Minutes 3/3/92 stating he felt obtaining as much input as possible would benefit everyone. Mr. Lee reiterated that although there is no legal requirement for a public hearing, that would not prevent the City from area posting to notice the date of agenda, while discussing previous notices issued. Comm. Di Monda suggested signs be posted approximately every block in the greenbelt area, agreed to by Comm. Merl. The greenbelt parking lot has been an issued for an extended period of time and the Commission agreed action should be immedi- ately taken. Vice-Chmn. Marks felt the parking issue should be regarding as one entire entity, to include the greenbelt parking, tennis courts and adjacent areas. Comm. Di Monda reiterated the Commission's determination to stop use of the greenbelt area for overnight parking by trucks, trailers and recreational vehicles. Commissioner Di Monda did not agree the oleanders should be trimmed. He felt the oleanders should be used as a screen to block vehicle headlights and lighting from the residents' views. The following suggestions as to design recommendations were majority agreed upon by the Commission: 1. Agreed the driveway should be relocated as the Parks and Recreation and Community Development Commission suggested, 2. The surface of the parking lot should be changed to state that surface should be a natural material, with input from the Public Works Department (asphalt is not to be defined as natural materials), 3. The final designs and specifications should be brought back for final review and hearing by the Planning Commission, allowing the opportunity for the Commission and the public to review and comment prior to construction, 4. Construction of signs should be from wood and painted, in keeping with a park -like feeling; signs should be kept to a minimum. 5. Landscaping to be provided to prevent cars from exiting north through the small park area or exiting south along the greenbelt jogging path. The landscaping design should be such that it contains parking within designated parking areas only, and exiting be only possible through the designated exit, 6. Keep the restrictions imposed by the City Council on the existing lot pertaining to lot closure, vehicle size, no overnight camping, etc., 7. Concept A was preferred by the Commission, with a maximum number of 75 parking spaces, but with the recommendation of 54 parking spaces; the number of parking spaces to be determined by the footprint; the acceptable width will dictate the amount of parking. The Commission recommended a modification of Concept A with 54 parking spaces, with the final count being left to the City Council's discretion. 8. The Commission preferred a design that wouldcreate a situation - 52 - P.C.Minutes 3/3/92 to ensure that General Services would make drive-through patrols to enforce the parking lot regulations. 9. Trees are to be preserved and greenbelt intrusion is to be minimized. 10. The priority is to be park use, with vehicle parking to be considered a subsidiary use and to have a minimized impact to the green space. MOTION by Comm. Merl, seconded by Comm. Di Monda, to RECOMMEND a modified Concept A, with 54 parking spaces, leave the final parking space count to the City Council's discretion with input from the Parks and Recreation Resources Commission, issue notification of a public hearing, place posting within the greenbelt and.encompass the ten design recommendations noted immediately prior to this motion. A AYES: ' Comms. Di Honda, and Merl NOES: None ABSTAIN: Vice -Churn. Marks ABSENT: Comm. Suard and Churn. Ketz STAFF ITEMS a. CORRESPONDENCE REQUESTING Q TING A RETAIL STORE WITH RACING TRACK FOR MINIATURE SLOT CARS BE ADDED TO THE PERMITTED USE LIST/1N COMMERCIAL ZONES, LOCATION 950 AVIATION BOULEVARD, S)JITE A & B. Mr. Schubach `equated the desirability of slot car acing to video machine stores.. He commented that currently of car racing establishments are ,not a permitted use and is a assembly use. He expressed Staff's concerns and recommended � text amendment be initiated by the Commission to add "slot -car racing for miniature slot cars in conjunctions with the hobbyZstore" (which is being proposed) as a conditionally permitted use by adoption of a Resolution of Intent. Mr. Schubach seated Staff's recommendation is that the applicants be allowec to immediately open as a hobby/toy store, but hold approval on the race track until compliance with the Zoning Ordinance., a detailed parking situation study is completed, noticing./ and the, application of mitigating conditions is completed. 'He then ex•lained the Commission's alternatives. Comm. Di Monda discussed another possib alternative for hobby/model stores with Mr. Schubach, noting e race track is specific to hobb shops and not an unusual Ilse . Mr. Schubach expressed his ncerns that a precedent would be se for others wishing to pr ote assembly -type activities. He state this item should be a ed as a permitted use, commented upon the parking spaces cu ently available, noted the smallness of the op ation and sug sted that no additional parking be required. He expl-'ned Staff' difficulty in determining permitted uses without estab- _ lis d cut-off points. Comm. Di Monda further suggested that p king were to become a problem, this item could be reviewed at - 53 - P.C.Minutes 3/3/92 REVISED REMOTE -PARKING , 1 CITY OF II 134,I1.11OS A 13CII • ` rC A IL, II IF O tib p J Ii A SCALE: I IHCH.400 FEET t Ln ` iJ • -rrii-innilll Kaiwanis Club @ Valley Park 2515; Valley Drive • •��� 26 spaces..:1"irlarg01 1 U.] 1 1=1.9789-- s .9-89:. CF•�--Jr l . I. . fl1 711 PP�9_CenLer 168 space Pier Ave. - I' t L If 7 UI..JUL CIn�ni t n1 Jnr-' 710 Pier Ave Ave 125 spaces 'v` shoe BeRailroad right-of-way 119 spaces StrE I .. Old Recre!Il .___j�_p 11)35 ValleYDrBiel,ation ui._ I • 22 -aces (-' ,•-,1 uvl�1 �i� r I i' l._ IC.�Qi91'.t H. I liU U CJ. U' . ** Publicly Financed Parking. Open to!Public (bottom level) ir C1 .mow 1861 ark Buildin • Valley Dr spaces Drive s 'Previous.Remote.Parkiiig::401!paces Revised Remote Parking : 472 -spaces Total Additional Parking: 71 spaces CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE DATE: MAY 11, 1992 CITY COUNCIL RE: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM: MARSHA ERNST TO GREENBELT PARKING ITEM #5 ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** The final action page from the April 14, 1992 minutes was not included with the original item for the May 12th agenda packet "Hearing Regarding Removal of Parking on Hermosa Valley Greenbelt." The missing page is attached to this memo. I apologize for any inconvenience. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 5 June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, questioned why the item could not be considered tonight as it was on the agenda under written communica- tions and under Council items; and, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, questioned why the vote to restrict parking had been taken without giving the public a chance to speak on the issue. Substitute Action: To bring the issue of parking restrictions on the Greenbelt back to Council for a public hearing at the meeting of May 12, 1992, without any conditions. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. Action: Mayor Essertier called for a vote to make the substitute action the main action. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Midstokke. Further Action: To approve the substitute action. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Midstokke and Mayor Essertier. Further Proposed Action: To suspend the enforcement of the parking restrictions and remove the barriers, but to keep in effect the ban on overnight/overweight vehicle parking. Motion Edgerton, second Midstokke. The motion failed, due to the dissenting votes of Benz, Wiemans, and Mayor Essertier. The order of the agenda was returned to Item No. 1 at 9:37 P.M. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO' TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) TO BRING INTO CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRI- ATE BY THE CITY COUNCIL, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMEN- TAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 598 FIRST STREET. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 7, 1992. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:44 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Harry Pecorelli - property owner, stated that he did not know it was zoned open space as he had bought it as manufacturing and had used it in that capacity ever since, now however, he would like to develop the property and live there; Merna Marshall - 360 - 33rd Place, stated it was probably the only piece of open space property City Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page 7771 (:)iiiL; 1 1e4-\ r'tS u Coat 01- ()(ol s 5- is cl,;15tirc 0( A.(Gc, rive 7pc A-4-, ��--�---- C foki-_1,11 . I e I0 II ivesa !�']a �Z I`� 2/ � r a 5 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Co e rte- a i'4 : a - C /0.L f r 11_4 'latch.— 4-0 arca- eye JY ew pork.° L-77 4-4 c e ", c� t f 1/1? rte, t //e Co ;. / c-4 C A // 71 67 J e 0 ?tic dr ea.,. t.. 61./ l Q �G12 a Gln ca_ f/ 14i41/elj 17171 C' S c�� L/�h doc,-1/i lam i C r '- - G PeYk t� C' `4'' C 1/e/A_ /i^ l/ 431- /`��- , � f 1 - r 51::/ f GA__ /of( tir��rY C't�✓ 7v L`) S; + ty r 4/ +/A L �. 4t_ive 3 +Lc./pa,,/ c- A-7 p /1.-- 5 .1JLn !/!V PO X_ p�X_r"% �t�► �,.rvI %'he / 47-7 hc; 7hi�t vim- 44 I e '/ /0; 3 J 4, ,4^ Th C rvlr"a in J'f' j o a�-os fo /41/0.:5 -f> 'r Csiv,5,75 A e t'6/1 1''S N./0,7/12,16 ).,//v /)i 27 I Ch.4.1 Cy. /1 nr, ) y 1,7 K,! ✓ CI A r +/ �( /? 0 v e 1/, c c� -� s 1 i ?/. c_t J � 2 y r s / mor 5 el/ • rV yfn7L -7/ z:r7 J i-ri/ci(.Z1‘6 ?A lif -.• . •L 17 4 a} `7 'J 74-0 / ,mss}- !• ir i s ,-/c-liy71 Dy7,_ / ;., a,-( it .2i f r / v,+ a.l �-.� 5, c ` v\ 5 /iv 4.A rf ? y4 ( ,:.,-/ry„ _..., i71-72 f, i V 7 t,i1.1- CY- .),'"1-7- ( i ' i '>'l ty ?- 0 %./`2 C7 y/ 74 L 2 P J 44v 1-2 yf -fry )[,1 &/ T' d t Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council (CONTINUED FROM COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14) SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 91-3 LOCATION: 598 FIRST STREET APPLICANT: HARRY PECORELLI 598 FIRST STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 *fi9�-/ 7 May 6, 1992 Regular Meeting of May 12, 1992 REQUEST: ZONE CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation The Planning Commission and staff, after further consideration of the Council's referral, continue to recommend that the City Council approve the requested rezoning to R-2 by adopting the attached ordinance. Alternatives The following are alternatives which the Planning Commission also considered: 1. Rezone to a residential Specific Plan Area, with the similar limitations as S.P.A.'s 3 and 4 but allow three units by adopting the attached alternative ordinance no. 1. 2. Rezone to R -2B, which would result in a maximum of 2 -units, without using a special zoning designation for one small lot 3. Rezone to a residential Specific Plan Area, with a maximum of two units, and similar restrictions as S.P.A.'s 3 and 4, by adopting the attached alternative ordinance no. 2 Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of May 5, 1992, considered the referral of the Council to consider an S.P.A. zoning designation that would result in two units instead of three units. The Commission, however, voted 4:0 to continue to recommend rezoning the property to R-2. The City Council, at the meeting of April 14, 1992, voted 3:2 to refer this request back to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation. For further background please refer to the attached May 5, 1992, Planning Commission staff report. Analysis The subject property, if zoned R-2, would be permitted 3.91 units. Since the zoning ordinance requires rounding down fractions the lot is limited to 3 units. If it is reduced from this allowable 3 units to 2 units, the density would be reduced from 19 units per acre to 12.7 units per acre. This density actually falls within the Low Density Residential range and is not consistent with the Medium Density General Plan designation for the area. In comparison, when S.P.A. 3 and 4 were imposed in 1989, the density was also reduced by the City, however, the reduction was from nearly 25 units per acre to 18 units per acre. Please refer to the attached May 5, 1992, Planning Commission staff report for a more detailed analysis of the requested R-2 rezoning as compared to the Council proposed S.P.A. zoning. If the City Council still desires to rezone the property to a Specific Plan Area, it would require a new S.P.A. designation (S.P.A. No. 10). Staff has prepared alternative ordinances for adoption if the Council chooses this alternative. The first would still allow for three units, while the second would reduced - it to two units. These ordinances include standards to require three parking spaces per unit, to limit lot coverage to fifty (50) percent, and to require a 10 -foot setback. Michael Schubach Pla ing Direc or Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Attachments Resp ctfully Submitted: en Robertson Associate Planner 1. P.C. Staff Report 5/5/92, draft minutes 2. Proposed ordinance to rezone to R-2 3. Alternative ordinances to adopt an S.P.A. zone 4. City Council Staff Report and Minutes 4/14/92 5. P.C. Resolution recommending R-2 rezoning 6. P.C. Staff Report and Minutes 3/3/92 7. Maps 8. Photographs 9. Application, correspondence from applicant p/pcsr598 April 29, 1992 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission May 5, 1992 (REFERRED BACK FROM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 14) SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 91-3 LOCATION: 598 FIRST STREET APPLICANT: HARRY PECORELLI 598 FIRST STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: ZONE CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) PURPOSE: TO REVIEW THE CITY COUNCIL'S PROPOSAL FOR AN S.P.A. WITH THE SAME REQUIREMENTS AS S.P.A. 4 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission continue to recommend rezoning the property to R-2 as recommended previously. Alternatives 2. Consider rezoning to a residential Specific Plan Area, with the similar limitations as S.P.A.'s 3 and 4 but allow three units. 3. Consider rezoning to R -2B, which would result in a maximum of 2 -units, without using a special zoning designation for one small lot Background The City Council, at their meeting of April 14, voted 3:2 to direct the Planning Commission to study a zone change to a residential specific plan area which would allow only two units on the property and with the same requirements as residential S.P.A. 4 which apply to property immediately to the west. The Planning Commission, at their meeting of March 3, 1992, voted 3:0 to recommend approval of the requested zone change in accordance with the recommendation of staff. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report for further background. 3 Analysis The Council was concerned about granting a zone change that would permit development at an intensity that might be too high for the subject neighborhood. The subject property, if zone R-2, would be allowed 3.91 units (based on 6,840 square feet divided by 1750 square feet per unit). However, the zoning ordinance requires that that fractions be rounded down, limiting the lot to only 3 units or a density of 19 units per acre. If reduced from an allowable 3 units to 2 units, the allowable density would be reduced from 19 units per acre to 12.7 units per acre, a full 33% reduction in density. The figure of 12.7 units per acre represents a number that would actually fall within the Low Density Residential density range of 0-13 units per acre as stated in the General Plan and would therefore not be consistent with the Medium Density General Plan designation for the area. The Planning Commission and City Council, based on similar concerns about density, reduced the amount of units allowed on the neighboring properties to the west of the subject site (540 First Street) and across the street (603 First Street). Those properties were requested to be rezoned to R-2 (from M-1, and OS) in 1989, to allow projects of 15 and 13 units, respectively (nearly 25 units per acre). The Planning Commission reduced the allowable number of units to 13 and 12. On appeal the City Council further reduced the number of allowable units to 11 and 10 (approx. 18 units per acre) and created S.P.A. 3 & 4 as the zoning for these properties. The Council also included provisions to require additional setbacks (10 feet from Ardmore), reduced lot coverage (33%), and 3 parking spaces per unit, but this was in response to a specific project being proposed. These reductions in density calculated to be total reductions of 26% for the project at 603 First Street and 23% for 540 First Street. Although these reductions were rather significant, it should be remembered that these were reductions from the high end of the Medium Density range of the General Plan, 25 -units per acre. The subject property at 598 First Street (due to its lot size being just short of qualifying for 4 -units) would be reduced from a maximum density that is already in the mid-range of the Medium Density classification. Furthermore, it could be argued that the reductions were reasonable given the close proximity to R-1 zoned property (to the northwest), and the large number of units involved in the projects. Staff would again refer the Commission to the attached map of existing development mix. As you can see the type of development is quite diverse ranging from single-family to up to 4 -units per lot. It should also be noted, as its not shown on the map, thatthe condominium project to the west of Ardmore contains 75 units, at a density of 23. 5 units per acre. In short, staff does not see strong reasons for reducing the number of units for this lot from 3 to 2. Perhaps, some additional restriction on development could be considered, but given the small scale of the project, staff does not believe that a special zoning for a single lot is necessary, further when a project comes forward it will be subject to discretionary review at that time. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report for further analysis of this request. ,___CONC�sU%r Michael Sdhubath Planning Director Respectfully Submitted: Ken Robertson Associate Planner Attachments 1. City Council Minutes 4/14/92 2. P.C. Resolution recommending R-2 rezoning 3. P.C. Staff Report/Minutes 3/3/92 4. Maps 5. Photographs 6. Application, correspondence from applicant p/pcsr598 5- DRAFT HEARINGS ZON 91-3 -- ZONE CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) TO BRING INTO CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT 598 FIRST STREET (referred from April 14, 1992 City Council). Recommended Action: To recommend approval of a zone change from Open space to two Family Residential (R-2) to subject property. Mr. Schubach gave the Staff Report, stating rezoning of this property to R-2 would be consistent with the General Plan and the general area. He stated, if zoned R-2, three units or a density of 19 units per acre would be allowed per the zoning ordinance. Mr. Schubach also discussed the City Council's decision to require additional setbacks, three parking spaces per unit and a reduction in the number of units allowed on neighboring properties, but stated the allowance of only two units on this 128 -feet deep by 40 to 45 -feet wide property or a density of 12.7 units per acre would not be consistent with the Medium Density General Plan designation for the area. He discussed the diversity of the area, zoning for specific plans on neighboring lots, and then stated Staff saw no strong reasons to reduce the number of units from three to two and did not believe that special zoning for a single lot was necessary. Vice-Chmn. Marks and Mr. Schubach discussed the specifics of the "S.P.A. 4" designation. Hearing opened by Vice -Chinn. Marks at 10:02 p.m. Harry Pecorelli, 752 22nd Street, San Pedro, applicant, stated that due to economical reasons, he hoped to return to Hermosa Beach and live on the subject property. He stated he would have many com- ments to make pertaining to the proposed hotel being built adjacent to lst Street, but would only address his application at this time. He explained the property's past zoning, protested any reduction to only two units, which he felt would devalue his property'. He re- quested approval of a zone change to R-2. Comm. Di Monda commented upon the lot devth, stating it could certainly accommodate three units and asked If Mr. Pecorelli would object to a 10 -foot setback. Mr. Pecorelli stated he felt the Council was spot zoning him, planned to remodel the current "front" building and the garage to allow him to live in it. He stated he would like to build units at sometime in the future to assure an income for his retirement. He wished to have the latitude to build three units. Hearing closed by Vice-Chmn. Marks at 10:07 p.m. After discussion between Comm. Di Monda and Mr. Schubach, it was determined the parking requirement for R-2 zoning was: two parking spaces per unit, plus one additional space for every two units. Comm. Di Monde did not feel parking would be an issue on this par- ticularly large lot. He felt the parking requirement could be P.C.Minutes 5/5/92 RST 6-- DRAFT increased to one guest parking space per unit and add a condition for consideration of a larger setback (possibly 10 feet) require- ment at the time the tentative map is presented, which would allow approximately 25 feet of available open space. Comm. Merl supported the rezoning based upon the lot size and consistency with the properties east of the subject lot. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda to APPROVE a zone change from open space (OS) to two-family residential (R-2), but to incorporate the requirement for one guest parking space per unit and the condition for an increased setback. After discussion with Mr. Lee, the motion was WITHDRAWN by Comm. Di Monda. Mr. Lee suggested that if recommendation to rezoning to R-2 were made, conditions should not be applied to the parcel until the point in time when the owner submitted an application for a devel- opment. The Commission would then have an opportunity, through the C.U.P., to review and establish applicable conditions. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Suard, to APPROVE a zone change from open space (OS) to two-family residential (R-2), as originally recommended by the Planning Commission, and advise the applicant that at the time of submittal of a C.U.P., the Commission will review setbacks and parking to assure conformity with some of the special plan areas in the neighborhood, as well as the standard conditions. AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Merl, Suard and Vice -Chinn. Marks NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Chmm. Rets SS 92-3 -- SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARD TO RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS, DEFINITION OF BAS'„! NTS D YI Y 0 :is 0 P•EN AL. Recommended Action: To set for public hearing. DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION ORDINANCE 92 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP FROM OPEN SPACE TO R-2, TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, FOR THE PARCEL AT 598 FIRST STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearings on April 14, and May 12 to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the requested zone change on March 3, 1992, and made the following Findings: A. The subject parcel is appropriate for residential use as it is surrounded by residential uses and residentially zoned property; B. Changing the zoning to R-2 will make the property consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential and will result in a potential density on the lot of 19 units per acre which is in the middle of the range identified for Medium Density of 14-25 units per acre; C. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the Staff Environmental Review Committee and the proposed zone change has been determined to qualify for a Negative Declaration; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the zoning map be amended as described as follows and as shown on the attached map, and adopts an environmental negative declaration: SECTION 1. Zone change from OS (Open Space), to R-2 (Two -Family Residential), the parcel at 598 First Street, and legally described as a portion of lot 42, Block 78, Second Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1992, by following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1 p/pers598 9 ALTERNATIVE 1 (S.P.A. with maximum 3 units) ORDINANCE 92 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP FROM OPEN SPACE TO SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 10, FOR THE PARCEL AT 598 FIRST STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearings on April 14, and May 12, and made the following Findings: A. The subject parcel is appropriate for residential use as it is surrounded by residential uses and residentially zoned property; B. Changing the zoning to a residential S.P.A. will make the property consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential and will result in a potential density on the lot of 19 units per acre which is within the range identified for Medium Density of 14-25 units per acre; C. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the Staff Environmental Review Committee and the proposed zone change has been determined to qualify for a Negative Declaration; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the zoning map be amended as described as follows and as shown on the attached map, and adopts an environmental negative declaration: SECTION 1. Zone change from OS (Open Space), to Specific Plan Area 10 the parcel at 598 First Street, and legally described as a portion of lot 42, Block 78, Second Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. SECTION 2. Add the following text to the zoning ordinance : "DIVISION 10. PLAN AREA NO. 10 Sec. 9.70-1. Authority. /0 This specific plan area is an instrument for implementing the General Plan pursuant to Article 8, Chapter 3,of the State Planning and Zoning Law (California Government Code Sections 65450 et seq.) Sec. 9.70-2. Location and description The subject property is fronting on the south side of First Street and is generally known as 598 First Street. The property consists of one (1) lot and has a total area of 6,840 square feet. Refer to attached map. Sec. 9.70-3. Purpose. The purpose of this specific plan area is to set forth the development standards and permitted uses for the subject property. Sec. 9.70-4. Permitted uses. The permitted uses shall be as established in Section 500 for R-2 zoned property. The maximum number of dwelling units shall be three (3). Sec. 9.70-5. (a) Parking location and dimensions shall comply with Article 11.5 of the zoning ordinance, and a minimum of two parking plus one (1) additional guest space shall be provided for each dwelling unit. (b) A minimum 10 -foot setback shall be provided from First Street (c) Lot coverage shall not exceed fifty (50) percent. (d) All other standards, including but not limited to, open space, placement of building, setbacks other than noted above, and building height shall be governed be the zoning ordinance, Article 5. R-2 Two -Family Residential Zone, and Article 7.2 Condominimums, Stock Cooperative and Community Apartments, if applicable. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1992, by following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California TEST: CITY CLERK PROVED AS TO FORM: !/0.-2z CITY ATTORNEY AT AP TEST: ALTERNATIVE 2 (S.P.A. with maximum 2 units) ORDINANCE 92 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP FROM OPEN SPACE TO SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 10, FOR THE PARCEL AT 598 FIRST STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearings on April 14, and May 12, and made the following Findings: A. The subject parcel is appropriate for residential use as it is surrounded by residential uses and residentially zoned property; B. Changing the zoning to S.P.A. will make the property consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential and will result in a potential density on the lot of 12.7 units per acre which is below the range identified for Medium Density of 14-25 units per acre; C. Requiring the lower density of two units for this lot is necessary to make the density and intensity of development consistent with surrounding property; D. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the Staff Environmental Review Committee and the proposed zone change has been determined to qualify for a Negative Declaration; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the zoning map be amended as described as follows and as shown on the attached map, and adopts an environmental negative declaration: SECTION 1. Zone change from OS (Open Space), to Specific Plan Area 10 the parcel at 598 First Street, and legally described as a portion of lot 42, Block 78, Second Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. SECTION 2. Add the following text to the zoning ordinance : "DIVISION 10. PLAN AREA NO. 10 Sec. 9.70-1. Authority. This specific plan area is an instrument for implementing the General Plan pursuant to Article 8, Chapter 3,of the State Planning and Zoning Law (California Government Code Sections 65450 et seq.) Sec. 9.70-2. Location and description The subject property is fronting on the south side of First Street and is generally known as 598 First Street. The property consists of one (1) lot and has a total area of 6,840 square feet. Refer to attached map. Sec. 9.70-3. Purpose. The purpose of this specific plan area is to set forth the development standards and permitted uses for the subject property. Sec. 9.70-4. Permitted uses. The permitted uses shall be as established in Section 500 for R-2 zoned property. The maximum number of dwelling units shall be two (2). Sec. 9.70-5. (a) Parking location and dimensions shall comply with Article 11.5 of the zoning ordinance, and a minimum of two parking plus one (1) additional guest space shall be provided for each dwelling unit. (b) A minimum 10 -foot setback shall be provided from First Street (c) Lot coverage shall not exceed fifty (50) percent. (d) All other standards, including but not limited to, open space, placement of building, setbacks other than noted above, and building height shall be governed be the zoning ordinance, Article 5. R-2 Two -Family Residential Zone, and Article 7.2 Condominimums, Stock Cooperative and Community Apartments, if applicable. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1992, by following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY p/pers598 84cKcRavND MATER/AL R> Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 91-3 LOCATION: 598 FIRST STREET APPLICANT: HARRY PECORELLI 598 FIRST STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 April 7, 1992 Regular Meeting of April 14, 1992 REQUEST: ZONE CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation The Planning Commission and Staff recommend that the City Council approve the requested zone change by adopting the attached ordinance. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of March 3, 1992, voted 3:0 to recommend approval of the requested zone change in accordance with the recommendation of staff. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report for further background. Analysis Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report for the analysis of this request. ICQAJCUR : / ) Michaelt Schtibac1 Planni g Dire- tr Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Attachments 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. P.C. Resolution 3. P.C. Staff Report/Minutes 3/3/92 4. Maps 5. Photographs 6. Application 7. Public Notice Affidavit -(6- Associate (6- Respectfullx Sgbmi ed: en Robrtson Associate Planner p/pcsr598 une Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, questione why the item could not be considered tonight as it was on the agenda under written commu ca- t'ons and under Council items; and, Jim Ro enber•er - 1121 Bayview Drive, qu4stioned why he vote to restrict parking had//been taken witho t giving the public a chance to speak on the iss e. Substitute Action: To bring the sue of parking restrictions on the Greenbelt bac to Council for a public hearing at the eeting of May 12, 1992, without any conditions. Motion Edgerton, second B=nz. Action: Mayor Essertier ca' ed for a vote to make the substitute action the ma iri action. The motion carried, noting the dissenting v a of M'dstokke. Further Action: To the st%bstitute action. The motion carried, n• ing the dissenting votes of Midstokke and Mayor Esser er. Further Proposed Action: To suspend the enforcement of the parking/restrictions and remove the ba riers, but to keep in effect the ban on overnight/overwe\ght vehicle parkin Motiorf Edgerton, second Midstokke. The motio'failed, due to the dissenting votes of Benz, Wiemans, a d Mayor E sertier. The or • -r of the agenda was returned to Item No. 1 at 9:37 P.I PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) TO BRING INTO CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRI- ATE BY THE CITY COUNCIL, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMEN- TAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 598 FIRST STREET. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 7, 1992. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:44 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Harry Pecorelli - property owner, stated that he did not know it was zoned open space as he had bought it as manufacturing and had used it in that capacity ever since, now however, he would like to develop the property and live there; Merna Marshall - 360 - 33rd Place, stated it was probably the only piece of open space property City Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page. 7771 1`1 - C in private ownership; suggested the city pur- chase it for a park; Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, stated the prop- erty had been manufacturing for many years; and, Harry Pecorelli - property owner, submitted infor- mation showing the amount of park/open space in the immediate area. The public hearing was closed at 8:52 P.M. Proposed Action: To incorporate this property with SPA No. 4. Motion Edgerton. The motion was withdrawn due to City Attorney Vose's instructions that the item would have to be returned to the Planning Commission if there were changes to the designation. Proposed Action: To refer to the Planning Commission to incorporate as part of SPA No. 4. Motion Edgerton. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Proposed Action: To approve the staff recommendation and introduce the Ordinance to change the zoning to R-2. Motion Wiemans, second Midstokke. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes .of Benz, Edgerton, and Mayor Essertier. Proposed Action: To change the zoning to R -2-B. Motion Edgerton. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Action: To refer to the Planning' Commission to study incorporating the property with SPA No. 4, thus allowing only two units. Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Essertier. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Midstokke and Wiemans. City Attorney Vose recommended that the Council continue the public hearing for this item until it was returned by the Plan- ning Commission. Further Action: To continue the public hearing to May, when the item returns to the Council. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered. The ord-er--o.f_the agenda was suspended at 9:03 P.M. to go em 4(b), Greenbelt'parkin.•. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. STAFF RECO 'ATION REGARDING PAY PHONES -ON -THE PUBLIC _ RICH OF -WAY. Supplemental memorandum from Acting City Council Minutes 04-14-92 Page. 7772 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P.C. RESOLUTION 92-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FROM OS, OPEN SPACE TO R-2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FOR THE PARCEL AT 598 FIRST STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed zone change on March 3, 1992, and made the following Findings: A. The subject parcel is appropriate for residential use as it is surrounded by residentially uses and residentially zoned property; B. Changing the zoning to R-2 will make the property consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential and will result in a potential density on the lot of 19 units per acre which is in the middle of the range identified for Medium Density of 14-25 units per acre; C. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the Staff Environmental Review Committee and the proposed zone change has been determined to qualify for a Negative Declaration; NCW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby recommend amendment of the zoning map as described as follows, and adoption of an environmental negative declaration: 1. Zone change from OS, Open Space, to R-2 Two -Family Residential the parcel at 598 First Street, and legally described as a portion of lot 42, Block 78, Second Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Di Monda,Merl,Vice Chmn.Marks NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm.Suard,Chmn.Ketz 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 92-12 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of March 3, 1992. Robert B. Marks, Vice Chairman Michael S Date p/pers64 -o- ubach, Secretary February 25, 1992 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission March 3, 1992 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 91-3 LOCATION: 598 FIRST STREET APPLICANT: HARRY PECORELLI 598 FIRST STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: ZONE CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Commission recommend approval of the request by adopting the attached resolution. Background Project Information: Lot Size: 6,840 sq. ft. Current Use: Furniture Manufacturing and Storage Current General Plan Designation: MD Residential Current Zoning: Open Space / r The manufacturing use of the property is legallyfnonconforming abased on the prior designation of this property as!manufacturing due to its location on a railroad spur. The Staff Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of January 9, 1992, recommended adoption of an environmental negative declaration, given that the General Plan designation is Medium Density residential for this lot and that established surrounding uses and zoning is consistent with R-2 zoning. The applicants desire to convert the existing manufacturing building to residential was also discussed and the applicant was informed that although the nonconforming manufacturing use could continue under R-2 zoning, conversion to residential would require bringing the building up to current residential development standards. -ZI- Analysis A review of old zoning maps and building department records show that the subject lot was zoned M-1 from 1930 to 1956, while on the 1978 map it was unclassified like all other parts of the railroad right-of-way. In 1984 it was designated open space along with other unclassified railroad right-of-ways whether owned by the railroad or privately owned. Although this made sense for the portion of the right-of-way which is now the greenbelt, there does not appear to be any reason, historical or otherwise, for this spur to be designated open space. The adjacent condominium project to the west was approved for a zone change in 1987 from M-1 to SPA. Although a zone change to R-2 was requested, because of the large size of the parcel a lower intensity residential SPA classification consistent with the middle of the Medium Density range of 14-25 units per acre was granted allowing only 10 units (18 du/acre). The property across First Place was also rezoned at that time from M-1 and OS to SPA for 11 units (18 du/acre). The properties to the east are all zoned R-2. The.subject property, if rezoned to R-2, would yield a maximum of three units, or a density of 19 units per acre. This would be consistent with surrounding _densities and uses and make the property consistent with the General Plan. Michael Schubach Planning Director Attachments 1. Maps 2. Photographs 3. Proposed Resolution 4. Staff Review Minutes 5. Application 6. Public Notice Affidavit -2Z- Respectfully Submitted: l%? / / +�,/` Ken Robertson Associate Planner p/pcsr598 Gr�g Snyder, 1902 Spirer Lane, responded to Vice-Chmn. Maks questions by explaining his building plans, including the,staIrway, decks and -retaining wall. Public Hearing closed by Vice-Chmn. Marks at 7:3013.m. MOTION by Vice-Chmn. MarksT_seconded by -Comm. Merl, to APPROVE PDP 91-10/NR 91-9 with conditions ---- `\` Comms. Di Monda,� Merl and---Vice-Chmn. Marks None � None- --,,_` _-Comm. Suard and Chmn. Ketz AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Itnoted this issue may be appealed before the City Coun ZON 91-3 -- ZONE CHANGE FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2) TO BRING INTO CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 598 FIRST STREET. Recommended Action: To recommend approval of said zone change and adoption of the Environmental Negative Declaration. Mr. Schubach stated Staff recommended approval, noted the lot wase previously zoned M-1, unclassified and designated open space in 1984, along with other unclassified railroad right-of-ways. He stated there did not appear to be any reason this spur should be designated as open space and explained zoning of adjacent properties. Mr. Schubach stated if the property were rezoned to R-2, a maximum of three units would be consistent with surrounding densities and uses, making the property consistent with the General Plan. Commissioner Di Monda determined with Mr. Schubach that the zoning was a oversight effecting the privately -owned property. Public Hearing opened by Vice -Churn Marks at 7:33 p.m. Harry Pecorelli, 752 22nd Street, San Pedro, explained the property's history, stated that he was not a developer and simply wished to occupy his own property. Public Hearing closed by Vice -Churn. Marks at 7:34 p.m. MOTION by Vice-Chmn. Marks, seconded by Comm. Merl, to APPROVE ZON 91-3. AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Merl and Vice-Chmn. Marks NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. Suard and Chmn. Ketz Vice-Chmn. stated this issue may be appealed before the City Council. _ It was noted this issue may be appealed before the City Council. —23— P.C.Minutes 3/3/92 General Plan Map HIGHWAY &i bbec.t Zoning Map HIGHWAY SPA 70 ♦ ry R -I nto 20n1+S 4un►fi5 4 u r,rt S 4una5 tun►+5 2unt}5 t uht+ Existing Uses 8unA5 Zu5 0 0 z 00 0 _ _ riesr 2 C-1 T Y OF H ‘ E R M O S A B EAC H PROJECT ADDRESS x_' /47 /25 / S'/ • Project Name (If applicable) LEGAL DESCRIPTION Pole_no/0 p F (cD c/ (36:-<- 7 24'7c' Z ZONING /1 s;9 s�cs7� APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name(s) /7AXff'{i�T'C"OdEk_ C:/ Mailing Address 7c:2- S i fdt Phonei(j) 31.7 5 c'73i Applicant's Relationship.to;property (*.e.f APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE /2 - PROJECT REQUEST _ Conditional Use Permit Amendment (3805) — Conditional Use Permit-Commercial(3812) _ Conditional Use Permit -Condo (3812) Number of Units Environmental Staff Review (3803) Final Map (3810) General Plan Amendment Specific Plan (Amendment) Change (3811) _ Lot Line Adjustment (3884) Nonconforming Remodel (3866) G7300' Radius Noticing (3868) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - RECEIVED BY: Parking Plan (3857) Permitted Use Request (3885) Planning Commission Appeals(3888) Precise Development Plan (3867) Tentative Map for Subdivision / Lot Split (3809) Tentative/Final Map Extension (3883) Text Amendment, Private (3886) Variance (3808) Voluntary Lot Merger (3887) Total Fees f PP 3 c� DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: DATE OF SUBMITTAL: }Zhiq J U fi N Ikirb CarsSt5 b (attach additional pages if necessary) C'Tl E A( (%L q•.1 -lug OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT* We/I �C,�L Q4(ng duly sworn, depose and say that we/I are/ the o ner of the proper involved in this application and tJ at the foregoing st ements and answers rein contained and the:nformation�/ erewith submitted are true and correct t he best of our/my knowledge and,b -Iief. bei ty he :i o t Subscribed and sworn before me this =7,44 -day of �! J..�C'Q/7Cl�.ZZ , 199/ . RY PUBL'IC' in and for the County of Los Angeles, State of California *Signature required from current igp'ature Addss 7 �:�/' S Telephony =�✓o �Z-�c�'z � •, ° ti OFF !'CIAL SEAL i. E,. PEC,Y H. BRUEHI NOTARY P. ELIC • CALIFORNA LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Comm. Expires Aug. 95, 1593 PROPERTY OWNER. not owner in escrow. Michael Schubach Planning Director 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Bch. CA. 90254-2450 Date: 4-20-92 Dear Mr. Schubach 1992 Please convey my profound appreciations to all the planning commissioners for their realistic evaluation of my property at 598 first st. for rezoning. I also wish to compliment you on your excellent presentations at the hearings we have had. I ask the commission to once again, please compare my request for R-2 zoning to what has already happen around me and the fact that everything to my East is already zoned R-2. To down zone my lot would be like spot zoning. Considering the developers to the West and North of me had their projects reduced 15% by down zoning when two years later my lot is being reduced 33%! I know everyone is trying to look at ways to reduce the density in Hermosa Beach. allowing me three units in this specific area, I believe, will have "0" effect on the density of Hermosa Bch over all. Please don't simply make me a victim of the times! For me, my future is at stake! _ ...._, /- / .-' Very Truly Yours �ar�/Pecarfelli POST OFFICE BOX 729---REDONDO BEACH, CALI("OR 852 Honorable Mayor and Members of - March 13, 1992 Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 24, 1992 SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION, CIP 88-406 INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF AGREEMENT FOR INSPECTION AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Increase the amount of the professional services agreement with BSI Consultants for inspection and contract administration. The proposed increase is for an additional $10,378. 2. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within budget limitations. Background: On December 11, 1990, the City Council awarded a professional services agreement to BSI Consultants for contract administration and inspection services in an amount not to exceed $62,320. That agreement was based on the originally proposed construction time of 120 days. However, the City Council, at that same meeting awarded the construction contract to the contractor for a period of 180 days with no increase in the contract to the consultant. On July 23, 1991, the City Council increased the time and amount of the professional services agreement with BSI Consultants to a not to exceed cost of $92,750 to cover (1) the longer 180 day construction contract time and (2) the City's additional request for design review of the project. Analysis: This analysis is divided as follows: 1. Reasons for the Increase 2. Increased Consultant Costs. 1. Reasons for the Increase The original construction estimate for the project from the design consultant was for $2,000,000. The construction contract approved by the City Council was for $1,587,648. There was a total of 22 change orders approved by the City staff for a - 1 - savings to the City of $82,587. The final construction cost on this project was for $1,505,061. The construction contract was a major sanitary sewer rehabilitation project within the City. The work locations were diversified throughout the City and 11,797 lineal feet of sanitary sewer main were rehabilitated with 585 service connections made to residences and businesses. Sewer alignments and grades were changed on many of the streets during construction to reduce costs. Due to the large number of changes that occurred during construction, there was an increase of 57 days in the construction contract. That increase was approved by the City Council for the construction contractor, but has not yet been approved for the consultant. This requested increase covers the additional time needed by the consultant for inspection and contract administration. The consultant worked with the City staff and was able to reduce what could have been an additional 456 hours down to only 152.5 hours. This was a savings of 303.5 eligible hours of work by the consultant. The result of this action was a potential savings to the City of $15,782. The consultant deserves credit for actively working in a manner to save the City as much money as possible. The increase of 57 days in the construction resulted in additional work for the inspection and contract administration consultant. That additional work is being presented for City Council approval at this time. In estimating what the revised total work would be to the City, the consultant was not stopped when their approved time ran out. The staff was in error for not stopping the work and coming to the City Council for this additional approval at that time. The additional work was required and needed to complete the project. 2. Increased Consultant Costs As in the past, the compensation is quoted on a time and. materials basis and the City is invoiced only for actual hours used. The cost is charged to the Sewer Fund and does not come out of the General Fund. Additional compensation for hours and mileage utilized to date and for completion: 152.5 hours @ $52.Q0/hour (additional time) = $ 7,930 Additional mileage due to time extension of project 6,800 miles @ $.36/mile = 2,448 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION $10,378 Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Do not increase the dollar amount of the professional services agreement. However, the work has been completed. Respectfully submitted, Lynn A. Terry P.E. Deputy City Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: SKI Viki Copeland Director of Finance pworks/ccsrincr Concu Car Malone P.E. Director of Public Works Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Ert BSI Consultants, Inc. October 9, 1991 Mr. Brian Gengler Assistant Engineer CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Subject: Addendum No. 3 to Professional Services Agreement Sanitary Sewer Repair CIP 88-406 Dear Brian: RECEIVED OCT 101991 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. I am submitting this request for additional fees as a result of an increase in change order extension days and overtime hours worked by our inspector necessitated by extended hours worked by the contractor throughout the duration of this project. As explained in my letter of August 29, 1991, overtime inspection fees may be deducted from monies due the contractor per page G-2, paragraph 2I of the project specifications. As of October 14, 1991, the project has generated a total of twenty (20) change orders resulting in thirty-two (32) extension days. Nine (9) change order extension days were addressed in Addendum No. 2 dated July 9, 1991, leaving a total of twenty-three (23) change order extensions not accounted for. Per discussions with Bob Norman, additional time (as yet undetermined) will be required to produce the project as -built plans due to the condition of the plans he has to work with to produce the as-builts. The additional fees requested are as follows: • 23 Working Days for Change Order Time Extensions (184 hours @ $52.00/hour) • 114 Hours Overtime @ $52/hour (Responsibility of Contractor) AD3•SSR.SV/MRO 19 $9,568.00 5,928.00 TOTAL $15,496.00 2001 East 1st Street. Santa Ana, CA 92705 • (714) 568-7300 • FAX (714) 836-5906 FAX. Mr. Brian Gengler City of Hermosa Beach October 9, 1991 Page Two The total fees are based on the time requirements as determined by the plans and specifications to bring the project to completion. These fees are invoiced on a time and materials basis, therefore, reductions or increases in time requiremnets will result in an adjustment of the total fee. Billings will reflect actual hours used for the project. Should additional services be required to accomplish project objectives, services will be invoiced in accordance with the unit rates that have been applied to this project following prior notification and approval of the City of Hermosa Beach. Since the above does not address additional time required to produce the as -built plans, I will investigate the conditions that may cause this task to take an inordinate amount of time and keep you informed. Please let me know as soon as a decision has been reached regarding this request and please call me if you would like to discuss this further or require more information. Sincerely, BSI Consultants, Inc. ii;)7 Vt&U.e— Steven M. Velasco Area Manager Construction Services Division AD3-SSR.SV/MR019 BSI Consultants, Inc. 16880 West Bernardo Drive. San Diego. CA 92127 . (619) 451-6100 . FAX (619) 673-7414 FAX CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LYNN TERRY, DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER CIVIC CENTER 1315 VALLEY DR. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 92054-3885 FOR: SANITARY SEWER RECONSTRUCTION CIP 88-406 NOVEMBER 20, 1991 INVOICE NO. 80092A JOB NO. 08093.00 0.4 1=-02_ r, M{rt ^iT g.. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING NOVEMBER 1, 1991 PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL SENIOR INSPECTOR NORMAN, ROBERT REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES MILEAGE TOTAL REIMBURSABLES HOURS 21.0 10.44 RATE AMOUNT 52.00 1,092.00 TOTAL LABOR 1,092.00 10.44 10.44 SUBTOTAL 1,102.44 BILLING SUMMARY LABOR EXPENSES TOTAL INVOICE AMOUNT 1,092.00 10.44 PREVIOUS INVOICES 88,264.00 3,383.21 TOTAL TO DATE 89,356.00 3,393.65 UPSET LIMIT 1,102.44 91,647.21 92,749.65 92,750.00 TOTAL THIS INVOICE $ 1,102.44 BERIAN PRINTING 1213) 376.5737 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PURCHASE ORDER DATE 1/27/92 ACCOUNT NUMBER 305-400-8406-4201 REQUESTED 8Y B. Gengler AI Purchases are subject to the conditions printed on the reverse side of this sheet Mail two (2) copies of your invoices - c/o Finance Department, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-0299. BSI Consultants, Inc. 16880 West Bernardo Drive San Diego, CA 92127 L 1 This Purchase Order is not valid without authorized signature. PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER 03664 DELIVER MERCHANDISE TO CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH c/o Distribution Area: Warrant No.: QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL Sanitary Sewer Improvements, CIP 88-406 Payment No. 10, Period ending Contract Amount Not to Exceed $ 92,750.00 Paid to Date 91,647.21 This invoice 1,102.44 Contract Balance $ .35 TOTAL $1,102.44 1 her equest th. der DEP MENT HEAD ORIGINAL I hereby certify that this order is authorized 9ECEIPT OF MATERIAL I hereby cediy that the goods or services as specified hereon have been received and that the quantities and quaities are property stated BY )3L, DatJ-3 °-9t Funds Available S Date APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT This invoice approved for payment in the amount • d Date BSI Consultants, Inc. January 10, 1992 Mr. Brian Gengler Assistant Engineer CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 SUBJECT: Sanitary Sewer Reconstruction CIP 88-406 Compensation Adjustment for Project Completion, Contract Administration and Inspection Services Dear Brian: Per request of the City submittal of this final compensation adjustment was delayed until the red- lined as-builts were completed enough to provide an estimate for the production of the mylar as- builts. I have reviewed the time required to provide the requested services for this project. In an effort to provide you with the most accurate accounting of information, I have utilized a format of actual and proposed hours to bring this project to completion. Please review the following information. • Hours accounted for in compensation to date: 720 hrs 507 hrs 162 hrs 1,389 hrs Original proposal dated 10/29/90 Addendum No. 2, approved by City Council 7/23/91 Contingency funds allocated per your letter of 10/3/91 Total accounted for in compensation to date • Actual hours worked to date and projection for completion: 1,763 hrs 15 hrs 1,778 hrs - Actual to date (includes overtime) - Projected for completion - Total for project to completion • Hours unaccounted for in compensation to date: 1,778 hrs -1,389 hrs -118.5 hrs 270.5 hrs REVSSR.SV/MR019 • - Total for project to completion - Total accounted for in compensation to date - Total project overtime - Unaccounted for in compensation to date 2001 East 1st Street. Santa Ana. CA 92705 • (714) 568-7300 • FAX (714) 836-5906 FAX Mr. Brian Gengler CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH January 10, 1992 Page 2 • Additional compensation for hours and mileage utilized to date and projected for completion: 118.5 hours @ $52.00/hour overtime = 152.5 hours @ $52.00/hour = Additional mileage due to extension of project 6,800 miles @ $.36/mile TOTAL ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION $6,162.00 (to be paid by contractor) 7,930.00 2.448.00 $16,540.00 Time spent on the project from 10/28/91 to 1/3/92 was utilized for various tasks such as the review of final quantities, field review of the project with you, investigation of problems, preparation of as-builts, confirmation of lateral connections and the final video check of lines. The projected is hours for completion include the time needed to wrap up the project and the as-builts. As in the past the compensation is quoted on a time and materials basis and the City will be invoiced for actual hours used only. Please give the final adjustment your immediate consideration as we have been over budgeted on this project for some time in an effort to produce the total fees for this project as requested. Do not hesitate to contact me if you need additional information. Please let me know if this increase is acceptable to the City. Sincerely, BSI Consultants, Inc. VI&161— Steven M. Velasco Area Manager Construction Services Division REVSSR.SV/MR019 BSI Consultants, Inc. April 15, 1992 Mr. Lynn Terry Deputy City Engineer CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 SUBJECT: Increase in Amount of Agreement for Inspection and Contract Administration for Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation, CIP 88-406 Dear Mr. Terry: Our increase in compensation in the amount of $7,930.00 is for hours expended for the final wrap-up of field work and time required to produce the red -lined construction drawings accurately representing the extensive changes made during construction. This was necessary in order to have a detailed representation of the final project to generate an estimate of fees to produce the final mylar as -built plans. The mileage charges represent mileage accrued as a result of the 60 day extension of the contract from 120 days to 180 days and the 57 day increase as a result of the extensive amount of change orders. The breakdown is as follows: • Mileage for 60 day extension 3,494 miles ® 50.36/mile S 1,257.84 • Mileage for 57 day increase 3,306 miles @ $0.36/mile $ 1,190.16 Since construction was occurring at multiple locations simultaneously our inspector expended considerable mileage traveling from site to site each day. 1 hope this explanation of fees will clear up any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. Steven M. Velasco Area Manager Construction Services P:\WP5I DATAUETTERS\VPL\SCX\CWPSti406.CF 2001 East 1st Street. Santa Ana. CA 92705 • (714) 568.7300 • FAX (714) 836-5906 FAX BSI Consultants, Inc. April 16, 1992 Mr. Lynn Terry Deputy City Engineer CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 SUBJECT: Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation CEP 88-406 Compensation Increase for Inspection and Contract Administration Dear Mr. Terry: It has been almost six months since my letter of October 9, 1991 notifying that our fees needed to be increased to complete our inspection services on the sewer rehabilitation. At that time I was told to resubmit my letter when the red -lined construction drawings were completed and to submit a proposal for BSI to produce the mylar as -built record drawings. On January 10, 1991 I submitted my letter the second time to increase our inspection fees along with a proposal to produce the mylar as-builts. Three months have elapsed since that submittal. During the time this job was in progress I visited the City on a weekly basis to update staff on our progress. At no time between October 9, 1991 and January 10, 1992 was I told to stop work or resubmit work or resubmit my request for increased fees. The inspection and contract administration services provided by BSI Consultants saved the City tens of thousands of dollars on this project. While there were a total of 22 change orders associated with this project the number of change orders could have been much higher considering the very poor set of plans and specifications provided for this project. During the duration of this project we worked under two City Managers, three Public Works Directors and seven Council Members. Our goal has always been to provide the City with the best level of service and professionalism we have available and to perform our service to the best interest of the City. I was obviously ignorant as to the procedure for the approval of additional work in the City of Hermosa Beach. It is not uncommon in most of the other cities we deal with for staff members to have the authority to verbally authorize additional contract dollar amounts once Council has selected the consultant. P:\WP51DATA\LETTER\VELASCO\88406-IL • 2001 East 1st Street. Santa Ana. CA 92705 • (7141 568-7300 • FAX (7141 836-5906 FAX Mr. Lynn Terry CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH April 16, 1992 Page 2 We are usually not informed of the ability of various staff members to authorize funds nor do we question the authority of our clients staff members. I now understand the procedures and process of the City of Hermosa Beach and will follow those procedures in the future. I feel that BSI has given complete cooperation during the project and in the past few months in our effort to have our additional fees approved. We have provided the City with any information, letters and records requested. I have had the project inspector available for project review and clarification numerous times at no charge to the City. During the past six months I have jeopardized my reputation and standing with my company assuring management that we were providing additional services in good faith and that the City would pay for our services since they have been a long term client of BSI. After spending five hours at the April 14th Council meeting only to have this matter continued for the second time to the April 28th Council meeting I am very confused why the City appears to be hesitating to approve our request for fees. This work has been completed, the contractor has been paid, the red -lined construction drawings have been produced and the proposal for the mylar as-builts has been submitted. We have provided the services we were hired for, saved the City a great deal of money, cooperated fully all to the complimentary satisfaction of staff and after almost six months have not been paid. We have no choice but to remain patient until a decision has been made. I wish someone in the City could explain what the problem is so I could give a reasonable explanation to my management. Their patience is wearing very thin with my assurance of the good faith of the City. Is there any additional information I can provide or action I can take to resolve this matter by the April 28th Council meeting? Sincerely, BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. Steven M. Velasco Area Manager Construction Services cc: Jerry King, BSI Consultants, Inc. P:\WP51DATA\LETTERS\vELASCo\88406.]L • _ . - y_?7 -qa- Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council RECOMMENDATION April 21, 1992 City Council Meeting of April 28, 1992 EXCEPTION PROCEDURE FOR - REFUSE ENCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS It is recommended that the City Council waive further reading and introduce the attached ordinance. BACKGROUND At the closed session of October 22, 1991, the City Council reviewed information pertaining to enforcement of refuse --enclosure- regulations. Due to theabsenceof any exception procedures, the City Attorney was directed to prepare an ordinance to provide for exceptions where extraordinanry circumstances may apply. ANALYSIS --The proposed ordinance would provide the Director of Building and Safety with the authority to make exceptions to the refuse enclosure- requirements. The proposed findings necessary to grant an exception are the same as those that are necessary for a zone variance; however, no notice or public hearing would occur. Since the refuse enclosures are minor structures and very few locations would likely qualify for an exception, staff feels that the less formal process proposed is, appropriate. The decision of the Director of Building and Safety would be final unless appealed to the City Council. If_ theproposedordinanceis adopted, staff will return with a resolution -for City Council consideration establishing fees for the exception request and appeal process. - Respectfully Submitted, VlJ (o William Grove, Director Building and Safety Con Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager WG/rb WILLIAM B. BARR CHARLES S. VOSE CONNIE COOKE SANDIFER JAMES DUFF MURPHY -------- ROGER W. SPRINGER EDWARD W. LEE HERIBERTO F. DIAZ JANICE R. MIVAHIRA BETH S. BERGMAN TO: _ FROM: DATE: RE: LAW OFFICES OLIVER, BARR & VOSE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1000 SUNSET BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 (213) 250-3043 ,MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council C5). Charles S. Vose, City Attorney March 30, Exception Container 1992 Procedure to the Refuse Requirements TELECOPIER (213) 482-5336 Attached hereto- is a proposed ordinance which would establish a procedure to review and potentially issue an exception to the existing refuse container requirements. This procedure is set up as an administrative procedure with appeal to the -City Council, however,- it may easily be modified to utilize the Planning Commission (rather than the Director of Building and Safety). to. initially review the applications. This=is=a policyiissue_.to be considered and determined by the -City Council._ In considering this procedure, it is important to_ recognize that -there is a potential that hundreds of properties- r may -. be in violation of- the refuse container requirements. -This exemption procedure'is suggested in order to address the=various problems and potential hardships that may arise as a result: of-. the strict enforcement of. -the refuse container requirements-_as -set forth :in._.Hermosa--Beach Municipal Code L -:_Section -27A-3 .As the City Council -may recall, all residential and:: commercial.-- structures constructed ----prior to 1973 were required -to -provide refuse -container enclosures in accordance -with -Section.--27A-3: on: or, before . March 8, 1979. Strict --enforcement--of-this provision has not -been exercised by the City. In an effort to initiate enforcement of Section 27A-3 to pre -1973 structures, staff recommends adoption of some form of review procedure to allow for exceptions to the requirements. This is necessary in order to allow for exceptions, where a OLIVER, BARR & VOSE Memo re Exception Procedure to the Refuse Container Requirements March 30, 1992 Page 2. property is unable to meet the appropriate standards due to unique circumstances. This exception procedure would not be applicable to containers in the public right-of-way, which could only be allowed in rare instances through an encroachment permit process including compliance with insurance and other related provisions. - Once an exception process is adopted by the City Council, staff will notify all property owners that are in non- compliance -that they must bring their property into compliance or apply for an exception within 60 days. All refuse containers located upon the public right-of-way will be requested to be removed immediately. Staff will also bring before the City Council a resolution establishing a fee for the application for an exception which may vary depending upon notice requirements and the reviewing body. CSV:ilf 9138 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9- 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 - 22 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO ESTABLISHING AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE FOR ISSUANCE OF AN EXCEPTION TO THE REFUSE CONTAINER REQUIREMENTS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1-. Section _27A-3 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code are hereby amended by adding thereto sub -paragraph (e) to read as follows: "(e) Administrative exception. When in the public interest and agreed to by the applicant, the director of building and safety may., without publishing, posting or mailing of notice and without public hearing, consider and render decisions on exceptions to this Section 27A-3 involving the location, size, and slight modifications.- to the requirements for refuse containers, not to include the removal or location within a public right building and (1) // 8359 of way. In granting an exception, the director safety shall make the following findings: There are exceptional- or of extraordinary circumstances or conditions -applicable to the subject property involved; (2) Such an exception is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant and the exception authorized shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 with the limitations upon other properties in the same vicinity; and (3) The granting of the exception will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience and welfare or injurious to property and improvement in the same vicinity in which the property is located. Application for an exception shall be filed by the owner of the property, or by the authorized representative of the owner, and shall be made to the director of building and safety on forms furnished by the building and safety department and shall be full and complete, including such data as may be prescribed by the director to assist in determining the validity of the request. When the application for an exception is filed, a uniform nonrefundable fee shall be paid for the purpose of defraying the cost incidental to the proceedings. Such charges and fees to be rendered shall be those which the city council may from time to time determine, fix, and establish by resolution duly and regularly adopted by it. The decision of the director shall be final unless appealed to the city council. Such appeal shall be filed with the director within ten days after the decision, and shall be placed on the agenda of the city council's next regular meeting. The council shall review the application and shall approve, approve with conditions deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare, or disapprove it, based on the findings listed above." I 8359 2 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the city council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1992. President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: , City Clerk APPROV D AS TO FO , City Attorney 8359 3. aav4h&ra.i.x.Ab Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council RECOMMENDATION r,d--, ) ,.) ,c,___,..., ./ ,,,,,,i... , ,z „.„._,„ f__, ..7.- -► , , k,/J..e--_—_y_i_ April 6, 1992 City Council Meeting of April 14 1992 RECONFIGURATION OF PARKING LOT "E" It is recommended that the City Council: 1) Cancel the lease with Vasek Polak, Inc., for the use of Lot 88 adjacent to Public Parking Lot "E". 2) Direct the Public Works Department to incorporate Lot 88 into Public Parking Lot "E" and restripe to provide the maximum number of parking stalls. BACKGROUND A report on parking alternatives for Pacific Coast Highway was presented to the City Council on March 10, 1992 (see background information). At that meeting, the City Council directed staff to negotiate with Vasek Polak to create a single City parking lot with ingress and egress on both Second and Third Streets, with the understanding that if agreement could not be reached, the current lease would be cancelled. ANALYSIS Staff met with Mr. Polak on March 17, 1992 to discuss all possible property trades, purchases or other actions that would accomplish the City Council's direction. Mr. Polak reiterated his desire to maintain the lease on Lot 88 since the loss of parking spaces would negatively impact his business. Other than maintaining the status quo, the only scenario favored by Mr. Polak would be for the City to sell him Lot 64 and provide the public parking lot on Lots 65 and 88. That arrangement would provide circulation between 2nd Street and 3rd Street; however, it would block access to the rear of Lots 58 through 62 which are currently accessed via Parking Lot "E". Staff does not recommend that alternative due to the access problems it would create including loss of available parking on private property. Since no other proposals were acceptable to Mr. Polak, the only remaining option to provide a parking lot with ingress and egress on both 2nd Street and 3rd Street is to cancel the lease for Lot 88 and incorporate it into the existing Parking Lot "E". FISCAL IMPACT 1) Loss of $4800 annual lease revenue. 2) Estimated costs of $2000 for parking lot improvements (restriping and repairs). Respectfully Submitted, William Grove, Director Building and Safety WG/rb Concur: SEE c,1_1 Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director CITY MANAGER COMMENT: Due to our current financial situation, I do not believe that it is in the best interest of the City to cancel this lease with Vasek Polak. I do not concur with staff recommendation and believe that staff should be dire ed to continue to work toward a solution wherein all parties would benefit. Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager/Director of Public Safety "Si N 1 37.' 38.50' 91.E 8C) O N v. 7 -16\N In L 1 2 N ' 45.04' 90.108' 45.04} 40.24 EX)-I113/T PI\C. COPS 1-0vi-WAY 6,1 30: 58 7n' 40. 59 A 40;, vl15! crn° dw o 0 0 60 N 64 PARaC:Nt• LOT « Es 61 62 0 40. 40.E I15' Y. PoLmtc owmio 89 1 - LL! w cc 1— erre owµg a.. 65 . .88 115. 115.' A CE z 0 U cn 14,*k.. wr rrY.'p-{y • 8. PARKING ALTERNATIVES FOR PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memo- randum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated February 25, 1992. Supplemental letter from John T. Bachmayer, Attorney at Law, 25550 Hawthorne Blvd., Suite 201, Torrance, dated March 3, 1992. Building and Safety Director Grove presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: John Bachmayer - 25550 Hawthorne Blvd., addressed items raised in his supplemental letter and responded to Council questions; Jim Brisson - Hermosa Saloon, stated there were now six vacant stores in the area with a revenue loss of 48%; suggested a third alternative not shown on the staff report: trade lot 88 for lot 89 with Vasek Polak, then sell him lot 65; com- bine lot 89 with lot 64 for a public parking lot with ingress and egress from both Second and Third Streets. Action: To direct the Building Department to form a committee to negotiate a settlement with Vasek Polak to create a single City parking lot with ingress and egress on both Second and Third Streets, with the understanding that if agreement can not be reached, the current lease will be canceled. Motion Benz, second Mayor Midstokke. The motion carried unanimously. Further Action: To approve the staff recommendation no. 1, to pursue negotiations for leasing a lot from General Telephone Company for use as a public parking lot; Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Essertier. At,,,,12: 20 A.M., the remainder of the agenda was continued to the meeting of March 24, 1992. MotionMayor Midstokke, second Edgerton. So ordered. 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Appointments to. Hermosa Beach Cable"Television Advisory Board. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dat- ed March 2, 1992. Continued to the meeting of March 24, 1992. Mayor Midstokke stated she"_saw no need -to have interviews with the applicants and would accept late applications. (b) Request=-b`y Vehicle Parking District Board to be included in joint _workshop meeting with the City 'Council, Plan- ning Commission and the Chamber of Commerce' -on May 14, r:- 1992. Memorandum from Leroy Staten, Acting Director of General Services dated March 4, 1992. Continued to the meeting of March 24, 1992. 11. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL BACKGROU MATERIALS Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council RECOMMENDATION: February 25, 1992 City Council meeting of March 10, 1992 PARKING ALTERNATIVES FOR PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY It is recommended that the City Council direct staff to: 1) Pursue negotiations for leasing a lot from General Telephone Company for use as a public parking lot. 2) Pursue re -striping parking lot "E" to maximize available parking spaces. 3) Renegotiate the current lease with Vasek Polak, Inc. for the city owned lot 88 adjacent to parking lot "E" to provide increased revenue. BACKGROUND On February 12, 1991, the City Council directed staff to solicit the support and participation of business and property owners in the vicinity of parking lot "E" to attend a series of meetings for the purpose of forming an assessment district to construct a parking structure. On June 6, 1991, the City Council also directed staff to explore with General Telephone Company the possibility of leasing excess available parking spaces at their site at 102 Pacific Coast Highway. On August 13, 1991, the City Council directed staff to process a parking plan before the Planning Commission to determine available excess off street parking facilities at GTE and to negotiate a lease with GTE for use of the excess off street parking facilities for business employee parking or as a park and ride facility. ANALYSIS I. GTE Parking Lot Lease A Parking Plan was approved by the Planning Commission on November 7, 1991 (See exhibit "A"). The plan allows the two most remote lots to be utilized for storage of new cars and/or city public parking. A license agreement has been prepared by GTE staff and reviewed by city staff and the city attorney. The license agreement is essentially ready for city council approval following resolution of the Planning Commission imposed condition relating to installing landscaping adjacent to residential property. The landscaping would be located on the lot utilized for new car storage by an adjacent automobile - 1 - dealer; however it is a condition of the parking plan and must be addressed prior to finalizing the license agreement. GTE is expecting the new car dealer to submit the required landscape plan which has yet to be accomplished. The license agreement would provide the use of thirty-seven (37) parking spaces at a cost of $500.00 per month. II. Parking Lot "E" (Between 2nd and 3rd Street, West of Pacific Coast Highway) (See Exhibit "B") Notices were sent to 33 property/business owners in the vicinity of Parking Lot "E"inviting them to a workshop meeting on April 10, 1991..The meeting was attended by seven (7) property/business owners and a chamber of commerce representative. Those in attendance expressed little interest in forming an assessment district to build a parking structure; however they were interested in increasing and improving available public parking. Among issues discussed were the following: 1) Re-establishing circulation from Parking Lot "E" to 2nd Street to provide access to the traffic signal on Pacific Coast Highway at the 2nd Street intersection and to be accomplished by one of the following: 2 a) Exchanging city owned lot 65 for Mr. Vasek Polak owned lot 89. b) Canceling lease with Mr. Vasek Polak on city owned lot 88. c) Cooperative agreement of owners of private property fronting on Pacific Coast Highway to utilize the rear portion of each lot. (Lots 58 through 63) Prior to 1984, circulation was provided from Parking Lot "E" to 2nd Street across the rear of lots 58 through 63 although there was no formal agreement or recorded easement. In 1984, a wall was constructed on lot 63 which effectively blocked the circulation to 2nd Street. That action precipitated litigation among the owners of lots 61 through 63 which has yet to be resolved. Re -striping Parking lot "E" to provide for more parking spaces by a more efficient use of the available land. Obviously re -striping would occur also if the circulation pattern were changed as indicated in item 1. Following the April 10, 1991 meeting, staff prepared parking lot layouts for several different scenarios identified in item 1. Since Mr. Polak owns or leases several parcels which are key to potential parking layouts, the drawings were provided to him first for review and comment. Mr. Polak did not wish to pursue any land exchanges nor did he wish to give up his lease to the city owned lot 88 since he felt they would adversely affect his operations. On October 30, 1991, another workshop was scheduled to review and discuss the prepared parking lot layouts. The meeting was attended by eight (8) property/business owners and a representative of the chamber of commerce. Based on comments and input at the meeting, the consensus of those present was to pursue re-establishing circulation to 2nd Street from Parking Lot "E" by a cooperative agreement among property owners as indicated in item 1(c) and, failing that, to request cancellation of the lease with Mr. Polak for the city owned lot 88. Staff was subsequently advised by the leaseholder of lot 63, Mr. Polak, that the property owner would not agree to removal of the wall to re-establish circulation to 2nd Street from Parking Lot "E". Staff does not recommend canceling the lease with Mr. Polak for the city owned lot 88 for the following reasons: 1) Loss of lease revenue to the city (currently $4800.00 annually). 2) Impact on operations to Vasek Polak Enterprises by removing a minimum of twenty-five (25) parking spaces. The current use of lot 88 in conjunction with lot 89 which is owned by Mr. Polak provides for an efficient "U-shaped" parking configuration. 3) All business owners on Pacific Coast Highway have been impacted by the Cal Trans action to remove parking during peak afternoon commuter hours. Loss of the use of lot 88 would be an additional impact to a major sales tax producer in the city. The recommended action is to re -stripe the existing Parking Lot "E" to increase the number available public parking spaces. Depending on the cooperation of owners of lots 58 and 60, it is anticipated that the existing 21 marked spaces could be increased over 50%. III. Renegotiation of Vasek Polak lease for lot 88 If the lease with Mr. Polak is not terminated to increase public parking as discussed in section II, staff recommends that the terms be renegotiated to increase revenue to the city. The original lease with Mr. Polak for lot 88 was entered into in 1972. The lease was renegotiated in 1985 to provide for a monthly rental of $400.00 At the time the lease was presented to the City Council for approval in 1985, then City Manager Gregory T. Meyer - 3 - indicated that Mr. Polak was interested in purchasing the lot via a development agreement. He indicated a development agreement would be presented to the City Council within twelve (12) months. He also recommended that the lease be canceled and other uses considered if a development agreement was not approved. A development agreement application was initiated which included vacation of a portion of First Place to increase available space for the dealership. Pursuit of the development agreement was abandoned due to citizen opposition to the street vacation. It does not appear that the lease of lot 88 was ever returned to the City Council to consider other uses. Due to the location of lot 88, staff believes that the best use of the property is for parking purposes, whether it be for public parking or in conjunction with Vasek Polak Enterprises. As indicated in item II, staff believes that the lease for lot 88 should not be canceled for the reasons identified. Staff does believe that the terms of the lease should be renegotiated to increase revenue to the city. If directed to renegotiate the lease, staff would include a provision for annual adjustments tied to the consumer price index (CPI). ALTERNATIVES 1) Cease negotiations to lease GTE for public parking. 2) Cancel lease with Vasek Polak for the city owned lot 88 to allow for its use for public parking. Respectfully submitted, W6i1c..--A--(A---12—__ William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety Concur: Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY TREASURER RE: RECONFIGURATION OF PARKING LOT DATE: APRIL 8, 1992 South Hermosa parking and access to City owned parking lots has come to the Council a number of times. For many different reasons Councils, after a public hearing, have acted as good neighbors to mitigate parking and vehicle storage problems. My concern with this item is that the approval of the staff recommendation may create more problems than are solved. Also, in a time when we are counting our pennies, the loss of additional revenue is distressing. Ga y Bruts h City Treasurer SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 11 LAW OFFICE OF JOHN T. BACHMAYER 25550 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD, SUITE 201 TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA 90505-6832 TELEPHONE (310) 375-2565 • (818) 784-0880 April 13, 1992 Honorable Kathleen Midstoke MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 FACSIMILE 1310) 791-2635 Delivered Personally to Addressees, and to Persons Copied, on April 13, 1992 Honorable Robert Essertier MAYOR PRO -TEM OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Re: My Clients Subject : Cobb/Berry : Reply to Opposition of City Manager and City Treasurer to Staff Recommendation Council Meeting: April 14, 1992 Dear Mayor Midstoke and Mayor Pro -Tem Essertier: As you know, my office represents Frederic Berry, Dolores Berry and Raymond Cobb (Cobb/Berry), owners of commercial properties at 217 through 229 Pacific Coast Highway, and at 305 Pacific Coast Highway, Hermosa Beach, California. I had the pleasure of addressing you at the City Council meeting of March 10, 1992 regarding issues surrounding ingress and egress problems in connection with public parking lots to the rear of the commercial establishments between 2nd and 3rd Streets owned by my clients, and the role played by Vasek Polak and former city administrations in creating and perpetuating those problems. Thank you for the time you allowed me for my remarks, and for the courtesy otherwise accorded me, at that time. I have reviewed with my clients the Staff Report and Recommendation on this issue prepared for the April 14, 1992 City Council meeting, as well as the comments of the SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Honorable Kathleen Midstoke Honorable Robert Essertier Mayor, and Mayor Pro -Tem, City of Hermosa Beach Re: Cobb/Berry Commercial Properties April 13, 1992 Page 2 dissenting City Manager. I have also reviewed the Memorandum of the City Treasurer voicing opposition to the Staff recommendation. Please allow me to make some additional comments at this time, points which my clients and I will seek to enlarge upon on the record at the April 14, 1992 City Council meeting: 1. The Staff Report and Recommendation is in conformity with the unanimous vote of the Council at the March 10, 1992 meeting as memorialized in the Minutes of that meeting. 2. The apparent suggestion of Vasek Polak that he be allowed to purchase from the City Lot 64 is no solution to the parking and access problems presented by the individual land owners and business owners in question. As the Staff report points out, this would completely cut off contiguous public parking from the commercial establishments (Lots 58 through 62). Staff is not recommending that this suggestion be adopted. 3. Denying Vasek Polak exclusive use of Lot 88 need not involve a sacrifice of rental revenue to the City as presented in the Staff Report. The City can rent to Vasek Polak parking spaces only (and enforce that exclusive use with some appropriate exercise of the police power) while leaving the aisle open for ingress and egress to and from 2nd Street for the benefit of everyone. This would resolve the apparent objection Vasek Polak has to cancellation of the current Rental Agreement with the City affecting that lot (his objection being that he needs those spaces in conducting his automobile dealership business). If Vasek Polak would not be interested in renting the individual spaces on those terms, his honesty in arguing his urgent need for the spaces is called into question. Alternatively, the City could easily raise the equivalent amount of revenue ( currently $4,800. per year) by implementing and installing metered parking or some other form of paid parking for all three public lots. 4. We understand that there has historically been an attitude (perhaps confined to earlier City administrations) that a large producer of sales tax revenue should be accorded special favor and consideration. While it may be common for cities to actively assist businesses to promote sales tax Honorable Kathleen Midstoke Honorable Robert Essertier Mayor, and Mayor Pro -Tem, City of Hermosa Beach Re: Cobb/Berry Commercial Properties April 13, 1992 Page 3 revenue, this can not be done at the specific expense of other neighboring businesses. We argue that any special treatment which favors one business over another is an unconstitutional exercise of city power, and is subject to injunction and claim for damages. 5. These concerns of my clients are not to be taken lightly. The Council is presently dealing with the livelihood of a substantial number of individuals who are property owners, business owners, and employees --all established in the two blocks between 2nd Street and 4th Street. 6. Evidence has been presented to the City Council that Vasek Polak has been in violation of the terms of the rental agreement for city Lot 88 which restricts his use of that lot to customer parking. The Council also voted unanimously at the March 10, 1992 meeting to take the indicated action to cancel that rental agreement if a mutually agreeable solution could not be worked out with Vasek Polak. The Council is now faced with making a courageous decision to implement its own resolution in the face of further intransigence on the part of Vasek Polak. 7. The City Manager and the City Treasurer do not understand the problem. It is a matter of principal, not a question of money. Continued exclusive use of Lot 88 by Vasek Polak denies to the surrounding merchnats and owners, who have need of additional parking as well as critical need of ingress and egress from 2nd Street, equal treatment under the law, and should be stopped immediately. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICE OF JOHN T. BACHMAYER By: JOH JTB/cc cc: Cobb/Berry Robert Benz Albert Weimans Sam Edgerton WILLIAM B. BARR CHARLES 3. VOSE CONNIE COOKE SANDIFER JAMES DUFF MURPHY ROGER W. SPRINGER EDWARD W. LEE HERIBERTO F. DIAZ JANICE R. MIVAHIRA BETH 3. BERGMAN TO: t(..4--e-14-' LAW OFFICES BARR & VOSE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1000 SUNSET BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 (213) 250-3043 MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers City of Hermosa Beach FROM: ckharles S. Vose, City Attorney DATE: May 5, 1992 RE: Jurisdiction of Hermosa Beach Board of Public Parking Commissioners TELECOPIER (213) 482-5336 This memorandum is submitted in reply to the City Council's request that I respond to some questions relating to the jurisdiction of the Board of Public Parking Commissioners and the authority of the City Council to review and approve certain contracts entered into by the Vehicle Parking District. As you may be aware, approximately one year ago I responded to a number of questions from different individuals concerning the responsibilities and jurisdiction of the Vehicle Parking District and, in particular, the potential conflicting jurisdiction between the City Council and the Commissioners. As this memorandum will discuss, the Board of Parking Place Commissioners has jurisdiction concerning the administration, management and control of the operative functions of the Vehicle Parking District. Therefore, the authority to review and approve contracts, with limited exception, vests with the Board of Parking Place Commissioners. The Board of Parking Place Commissioners was established by the City pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 31770 et seq. The City Council may serve as the Board of Parking Place Commissioners or the City Council can appoint a three or five -member board made up of non -City Councilmembers (Streets and Highways Code Section 31771). Once the appointment of a commission is made by the City Council, the powers and duties vest with the Parking Place Commissioners and the legislative body no longer retains primary jurisdiction over the management and operation of the District. 10 OLIVER, BARR & VOSE Memo re Jurisdiction of Hermosa Beach Board of Public Parking Commissioners May 5, 1992 Page 2. The Streets and Highways Code clearly states that "the Board shall operate, manage, and control the parking places and make and enforce all necessary regulations for their use" (Section 31780). The board has the power to "fix, regulate and collect rentals, fees or charges" (Section 31781), may appoint employees (Section 31785), may lease or grant franchises for parking places (Section 31786), and may improve "any parking place under its charge" (Section 31792). The Board is required to prepare an estimate of the expenditures required for the maintenance, operation, repair and improvement of the parking places under its charge for each ensuing fiscal year and also estimate the amount of revenues to be derived from rentals, fees or charges for use of the parking places (Sections 31820 and 31821). One of the questions which has been previously raised concerns the proper expenditure of funds by the Board. Streets and Highways Code Section 31827 states that "all revenues from fees, charges, or rental. . . may be used for the acquisition, improvement, maintenance, repair, and operation of any parking places for the use and benefit of the District." Therefore, for an expenditure to be proper, the expenditure must be for the use and benefit of the District. Again, the City Council and the current Board of Parking Place Commissioners should keep in mind that jurisdiction over the expenditures of money created within the Parking District are solely under the authority of the Parking Place Commissioners. The determination of who sits as a Parking Place Commissioner is within the jurisdiction of the City Council. The applicable statutes of the Vehicle Parking District Law of 1943, provides the City Council with authority to remove any commissioner at anytime by a 4/5 vote or eliminate the Board of Parking Place Commissioners and transfer jurisdiction back to the City Council. In appointing the current Board of Parking Place Commissioners, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 90-1037. It is my interpretation of Ordinance No. 90-1037 that the accounting clause is merely a procedural mechanism under which funds can be accounted for. This provision does not limit the jurisdiction of the Board of Parking Place Commissioners or require City Council approval of appropriate expenditures. Having the expenditures audited as part of the OLIVER, BARR & VOSE Memo re Jurisdiction of Hermosa Beach Board of Public Parking Commissioners May 5, 1992 Page 3. City budget or included as part of the warrants, should be interpreted as an accounting procedure and not a requirement for City Council ratification of any contracts for the Vehicle Parking District. This is not to say that there are not limitations on the powers exercised by the Board of Parking Place Commissioners. For example, contracts for the lease or purchase of real or personal property where the VPD is the purchaser or lessee are required to be made by the legislative body. Title to all real property acquired in this regard is to be held in the name of the City. However, the operation, management and control of parking places is under the complete charge, supervision and control of the Board of Commissioners. I hope that this memorandum helps to clarify the jurisdiction of the Vehicle Parking District and answer any questions raised by the City Council. CSV: ilf cc: Rick Ferrin, City Manager Viki Copeland, Finance Director 9787