HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/09/92,e.4..) -554 4c'7
/a7/
"Putting your best foot forward at least
keeps it out of your mouth." -Morris Mandel
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 9, 1992 - Council Chambers, City Hall
Closed Session - 6:45 p.m.
Regular Session - 7:30 p.m.
MAYOR
Robert Essertier
MAYOR PRO TEM
Albert Wiemans
COUNCILMEMBERS
Robert Benz
Sam Y. Edgerton
Kathleen Midstokke
CITY CLERK
Elaine Doerfling
CITY TREASURER
Gary L. Brutsch
CITY MANAGER
Frederick R. Ferrin
CITY ATTORNEY
Charles S. Vose
All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND.
The Council receives a packet with detailed information and
recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda
packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart-
ment, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Cham-
ber of Commerce. During the meeting a packet also is available
in the Council foyer.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any
items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time.
(Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard
during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one
minute. Citizens also may speak:
1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public
Hearings,
2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of
items appearing under Municipal Matters, and
3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen
Comments".
1.
CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters
will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the
majority consent of the City Council. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless good cause is
shown by a member prior to the roll call vote.
* Councilmember requests to remove items from the
Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered
2
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(7)
(k)
under Agenda Item 3.)
* Public comments on the Consent Calendar.
Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of
the City Council held on May 26, 1992.
Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants
Nos. through inclusive.
Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future
Agenda Items.
Recommendation to receive and file the May, 1992 invest-
ment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L.
Brutsch dated June 2, 1992.
Recommendation toadopt resolution to participate in Los
Angeles County In rim Paratranstf'Plan for Disabled.
Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated
May 19, 1992.
Recommendation to receive and file letter from Caltrans
re. Pacific Coast Highway curb parking prohibition.
Memorandum from City Traffic Engineer Ed Ruzak dated May
27, 1992.
Recommendation to authorize the Mayor to sign a Grant of
Easement to GTE correcting an existing telephone pole
line easement at South School property. Memorandum from
Public Works Department dated May 19, 1992.
Recommendation to adopt resolution amending the Master
Fee Resolution No. 90-5422 to all w a reduced fee for
fence and wall conditional use permits. Memorandum from
Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 1, 1992.
Recommendation toadopt resolution approving City's par-
ticipation in the os Angeles Co ty Transportation Com-
mission's subregional mobility program to receive addi-
tional funds for Dial -A -Ride Program. Memorandum from
Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 1, 1992.
Recommendation to pprove lease agreement) between the
City of Hermosa Be ch and the Los Angel County Bar
Association Dispute Resolution Services, Inc. for space
in the Community Center. Memorandum from Community
Resources Director Mary Rooney dated June 1, 1992.
Recommendation toapprove lease agreement between South
Bay Free Clinic an City of Hermosa Bea for use of
Room 7 in the Community Center. Memorandum from Com-
munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated June 1,
1992.
(1) Recommendation to adopt resolution of intent to study
elimination of He osa Beach City Code Section 7.2-27
- 2 -
(m)
(n)
(o)
regarding conditional approval of condominium conver-
sions. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated June 2, 1992.
Recommendation to receive and file report on construc-
tion of Owosso storm drain project. Memorandum from
Public Works Department dated June 1, 1992.
Recommendation to award contract for Third Party Ad-
ministration of Liability Claims to Ward-THK and au-
thorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a
three year contract. Memorandum from Risk Manager Rob-
ert Blackwood dated June 3, 1992.
Recommendation to extend for thirty days the temporary
appointment for the Acting General Services Director.
Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat-
ed June 2, 1992.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES.
(a) JRDINANCE NO. 92-106] - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7,
ARTICLES I, II, III, IV, AND CHAPTER 24 OF THE CITY CODE
RELATING TO BUILDING AND PLUMBING REGULATIONS AND ADOPT-
ING WITH CERTAIN ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND AMENDMENTS,
THE RULES, REGULATIONS, PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS SET
FORTH IN THOSE CERTAIN CODES ENTITLED, "UNIFORM BUILDING
CODE, 1991 EDITION", "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS,
1991 EDITION", "UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, 1991 EDITION", AND
"UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS,
1991 EDITION", PROMULGATED AND PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNA-
TIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS AND THE "UNIFORM
PLUMBING CODE, 1991 EDITION" AND "UNIFORM MECHANICAL
CODE, 1991 EDITION", PROMULGATED AND PUBLISHED JOINTLY
BY THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND
MECHANICAL OFFICIALS AND THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF
BUILDING OFFICIALS. For adoption.
(b) ORDINANCE NO. 92-107] - AN ORDINANCE REPEALING EXISTING
PTER 12 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE IN ITS
ENTIRETY AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, THE 1991 EDITIONS OF
THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, INCLUDING APPENDIX CHAPTERS III-
A, III -B, III -C, VI -A, VI -C AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE
STANDARDS, AS AMENDED. For adoption.
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
* Public comments on items removed from the Consent
Calendar.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS.
(a)
Letter from June Williams, 2065 Manhattan Avenue, dated
June 1, 1992 regarding comments made at last Council
meeting concerning her property.
3
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M.
NONE
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
5. REVIEW OF ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR 2930 THE STRAND.
Memorandum from Public Works Department dated June 4,
1992. (Continued from May 26, 1992 meeting.)
6. RECOMMENDATION RE. REPORT ON SURVEYING DISCREPANCIES AND
EXISTING PROCEDURE FOR PROTECTING SURVEY MONUMENTS ALONG
MONTEREY BOULEVARD AND BAYVIEW DRIVE BETWEEN 16TH AND
19TH STREETS. Memorandum from Public Works Department
dated June 4, 1992. (Continued from May 26, 1992
meeting.)
7. REQUEST BY MULTIVISION TO MAKE A QUICK EXCAVATION ON
GREENBELT FROM 25TH STREET TO MANHATTAN BOUNDARY TO IN-
STALL A FIBER OPTIC CABLE. Memorandum from City Manager
Frederick R. Ferrin dated June 4, 1992.
8. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING VEHICLE PARKING DIS-
TRICT AND BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS. Memo-
randum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated June
4, 1992. (Request by Mayor Essertier to continue this
matter to the June 23, 1992 meeting).
9. RECOMMENDATION FROM PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY
RESOURCES COMMISSION REGARDING POTENTIAL USE OF SOUTH
SCHOOL SITE FOR RELOCATION OF CITY YARD. Memorandum
from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated June
1, 1992.
10. SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 15, 1992.
A. STATUS REPORT ON FISCAL IMPACT AND GENERAL PLAN
CONSISTENCY OF THE OPEN SPACE BALLOT MEASURE.
Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach
dated June 1, 1992.
B. APPROVE ATTACHED ELECTION BUDGET, APPROVE FINAL
WORDING OF BALLOT MEASURE QUESTION, AND ADOPT THE
RESOLUTION CALL NG ELECT.N AND GIVING NOTICE, AND
CERTAIN OTHER RESOLUTION NECESSARY FOR THE SPECIAL
MUNICIPAL ELEC ON, SEPTEMBER 15, 1992. Memorandum
from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated June 3,
1992.
11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
(a) Notification of absences of Board of Parking Place Com-
missioner. Memorandum from Acting General Services Di-
rector Henry L. Staten dated June 3, 1992.
- 4 -
13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items:
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to
discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back
on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun-
cil action tonight.
(a) Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of request-
ing the City Manager to ask the Coastal Commission for
permission to pave the Biltmore Site for parking and not
encumber it in the future for use for development.
(b) Request by Councilmember Midstokke for discussion of
vehicles parking on front lawns.
(c)
Request by Councilmember Wiemans for discussion of 5 ft.
height reduction in R-3 and R -P zones. Memorandum from
Councilmember Wiemans dated June 4, 1992.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within
the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time.
Please limit comments to three minutes.
ADJOURNMENT
5
Where there is no vision the people perish...
HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating
in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your
interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often.
Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the
next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the
weekend before the meetings.
Opportunities for Public Comments
Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or oral-
ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's
or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included
in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet com-
pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting.
Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual
basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the
notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the
Council.
It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be-
gin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas
are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time
allowed.
Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M.,
Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays.
There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers.
(over)
THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT
Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager
appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council
policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager,
operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy
making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form
of City government in the United States today.
GLOSSARY
The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most
agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council.
Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one
vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may
remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered
under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion.
Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by
law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni-
ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being
heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the
Hearing.
Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or
public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading
introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may
adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or-
dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances
are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements.
Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions
or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by
letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday
preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the
Council agenda.
Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion
by the City Council are placed here.
Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi-
nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action
by the City Council.
Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the
agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding
Wednesday.
Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council
may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council.
Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention
of a Council member after publication of the Agenda.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, June 9, 1992, at the
hour of 7 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION - the closed session was held at P.M.
matters of
The
closed session was recessed at 7: P.M. to the regular scheduled
public meeting.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: fes%%
ROLL CALL:
Present: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Essertier
Absent: None ll
ANNOUNCEMENTS: $ �/yt5 �,Qi1O ) "--1" -‘7"
regarding
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any
items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time.
(Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard
during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one
minute. Citizens also may speak:
1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public
Hearings,
2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of
items appearing under Municipal Matters, and
3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen
Comments".
Coming forward to address the Council at this time were:
/' o?9S v
? v
v 1 ate Nel-
X
- (*,
aC
-->—ei v
v (� �' P ` - 1
1.12)-
c`5 'T /� ,3 ) /' /° �' r," Q.P.3 -1 •
.2-P* c
1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters
will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the
majority consent of the City Council. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless good cause is
shown by a member prior to the roll call vote.
* Councilmember requests to remove items from the
Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered
under Agenda Item 3.)
* Public comments on the Consent Calendar.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations
(a) through (o), with the exception of the following
items which were removed for discussion in item 3 but
are listed in order for clarity: (a) , (b) , (c)
(e) , (f) , (g) , (h) , (i) ,
(k) , (1) , (m) , (n) , and (o)
!, second Ag5. So ordered.
, (d)
(j)
Motion
C
t
No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed
from the consent calendar.
(a)
(b)
Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of
the City Council held on May 26, 1992.
Action: To continue approval of the minutes of the
meeting of May 26, 1992 to the next meeting, at the
request of the City Clerk.
Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants
Nos. 40860 through 40942 inclusive, and Nos. 40944
through 41021 inclusive; noting voided warrants Nos.
40867, 40868, 40869, 40870, 40891, 40945, 40946, and
40947.
Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as
presented.
I
(c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future
Agenda Items.
Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda
items as presented.
(d)
(e)
(f)
Recommendation to receive and file the May, 1992 invest-
ment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L.
Brutsch dated June 2, 1992.
Action: To receive and file the May, 1992 investment
report as presented.
Recommendation to adopt resolution to participate in Los
Angeles County Interim Paratransit Plan for Disabled.
Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated
May 19, 1992.
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-550, entitled, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY
COORDINATED PARATRANSIT PLAN."
Recommendation to receive and file letter from Caltrans
re. Pacific Coast Highway curb parking prohibition.
Memorandum from City Traffic Engineer Ed Ruzak dated May
27, 1992.
Action: To receive and file the letter from Caltrans
dated May 13, 1992, regarding Caltrans' time frame for
providing the City with a nine-month status report on
the Pacific Coast Highway curb parking prohibition.
3
•
(g)
(h)
(i)
Recommendation to authorize the Mayor to sign a Grant of
Easement to GTE correcting an existing telephone pole
line easement at South School property. Memorandum from
Public Works Department dated May 19, 1992.
Action: To authorize the Mayor to sign a Grant of Ease-
ment to GTE correcting the legal description of an ex-
isting telephone pole line easement at the South School
property.
Recommendation to adopt resolution amending the Master
Fee Resolution No. 90-5422 to allow a reduced fee for
fence and wall conditional use permits. Memorandum from
Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 1, 1992.
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-55/K entitled, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 90-5422 TO ES-
TABLISH AN ADDITIONAL FEE CATEGORY FOR CONDITIONAL USE
PERMITS FOR WALLS AND FENCES."
Recommendation to adopt resolution approving City's par-
ticipation in the Los Angeles County Transportation Com-
mission's subregional mobility program to receive addi-
tional funds for Dial -A -Ride Program. Memorandum from
Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 1, 1992.
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-55f5, entitled, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH APPROVING THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE LOS AN-
GELES COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SUBREGIONAL
INCENTIVE MOBILITY PROGRAM."
(j)
(k)
(1)
Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the
City of Hermosa Beach and the Los Angeles County Bar
Association Dispute Resolution Services, Inc. for space
in the Community Center. Memorandum from Community
Resources Director Mary Rooney dated June 1, 1992.
Action: To approve and authorize the Mayor to sign a
one-year lease agreement between the City of Hermosa
Beach and Los Angeles County Bar Association Dispute
Resolution Services, Inc., commencing on July 1, 1992
and ending on June 30, 1993, for use of Room 6B in the
Community Center at $168 per month ($.84 per square
foot), as recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Com-
munity Resources Commission and staff.
Recommendation to approve lease agreement between South
Bay Free Clinic and City of Hermosa Beach for use of
Room 7 in the Community Center. Memorandum from Com-
munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated June 1,
1992.
Action: To approve and authorize the Mayor to sign a
one-year lease agreement between the South Bay Free
Clinic and the City of Hermosa Beach, commencing on June
15, 1992 and ending on June 15, 1993, for use of Room 7
in the Community Center, as recommended by the Parks,
Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff,
with the lease payment waived for the first two months
to allow the Free Clinic to make necessary repairs/
improvements to Room 7, and the following rent schedule
thereafter: August 15, 1992 - $462; September 1, 1992
through May 31, 1993 - $924/month; and June 1, 1993 to
June 15, 1993 - $462.
Recommendation to adopt resolution of intent to study
elimination of Hermosa Beach City Code Section 7.2-27
regarding conditional approval of condominium conver-
sions. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated June 2, 1992.
Thi em as - oved om t
ci f•r =epa
th
•
(m)
P1
re
irect
and re-•onded
Mi hael
ach
uncil
do
aff
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-553/6, entitled, 'IA
RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNC L OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO STUDY ELIMINATING SECTION
7.2-27 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF CONDOMINIUM CONVERSTIONS."
Mo. i •
t o•' cti..- of
Recommendation to receive and file report on construc-
tion of Owosso storm drain project. Memorandum from
Public Works Department dated June 1, 1992.
Action: To receive and file the report on the construc-
tion of the Owosso storm drain project, which is a Los
Angeles County project.
Recommendation to award contract for Third Party Ad-
ministration of Liability Claims to Ward-THR and au-
thorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a
three year contract. Memorandum from Risk Manager Rob-
ert Blackwood dated June 3, 1992.
This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun-
cilmember Ems- for separate discussion later in
the meeting.
Risk Manager Blackwood
responded to Council questions.
,,
(0)
Action: To award the contract for Third Party Ad-
ministration of Liability Claims to Ward-THK and au-
thorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a
three-year contract with Ward-THK.
Motion , second So ordered, noting
the objections of
Recommendation to extend for thirty days the temporary
appointment for the Acting General Services Director.
Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat-
ed June 2, 1992.
Action: To extend for thirty days the temporary ap-
pointment of the Acting General Services Director.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES.
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 92-1069 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7,
ARTICLES I, II, III, IV, AND CHAPTER 24 OF THE CITY CODE
RELATING TO BUILDING AND PLUMBING REGULATIONS AND ADOPT-
ING WITH CERTAIN ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND AMENDMENTS,
THE RULES, REGULATIONS, PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS SET
FORTH IN THOSE CERTAIN CODES ENTITLED, "UNIFORM BUILDING
CODE, 1991 EDITION", "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS,
1991 EDITION", "UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, 1991 EDITION", AND
"UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS,
1991 EDITION", PROMULGATED AND PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNA-
TIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS AND THE "UNIFORM
PLUMBING CODE, 1991 EDITION" AND "UNIFORM MECHANICAL
CODE, 1991 EDITION", PROMULGATED AND PUBLISHED JOINTLY
BY THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND
MECHANICAL OFFICIALS AND THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF
BUILDING OFFICIALS. For adoption. / \
Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 92-1069.
Motion , second . So ordered.
1
- 7 -
-lif 7�" /3),
/...zr'- A, d� ted- t r' �' c e
(-(-?,))
?/)
g j a3seg
40i3e
(b) ORDINANCE NO. 92-1070 - AN ORDINANCE REPEALING EXISTING
CHAPTER 12 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE IN ITS
ENTIRETY AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, THE 1991 EDITIONS OF
THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, INCLUDING APPENDIX CHAPTERS III-
A, III -B, III -C, VI -A, VI -C AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE
STANDARDS, AS AMENDED. For adoption.
Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 92-1070.
Motion , second ,4J . So ordered.
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
Item 1 . , - d -
)-r--(740 ;--rl)._,___ (n) JdA heard at this
time, but). r.a shown in order for clarity.
* Public comments on items removed from the Consent
Calendar. `7
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS.
(a) Letter from June Williams, 2065 Manhattan Avenue, dated
June 1, 1992 regarding comments made at last Council
meeting concerning her property.
Action: To
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M.
NONE
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
5. REVIEW OF ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR 2930 THE STRAND.
Memorandum from Public Works Department dated June 4,
1992. (Continued from May 26, 1992 meeting.)
presented the staff
re•.r and re onded to Counci questions.
Coming forward to address the Council on this item were:
Lt /20.J•-' j/ a- 67 ( '� _' � f
- /;p )v." 41---) A -L- --e
_ 8 _
,Aa_
III .
..„.... r 9 v .e-----( de--"=' Y>.
91 75
' - 7. '/-c.e�.y �,%--A- �S k e ' " J
� � f
Action: To allow the existing approved encroachment
/t ��l� �� permit for 2930 Strand to remain as approved, as recom-
//`� mended by staff. .
( ,,n Motion , second
101x&-ae✓L �x noting the objections of
0•0( fr/l/eA J il J
6.
57;/0 --- 7;
RECOMMENDATION RE. REPORT ON SURVEYING DISCREPANCIES AND
EXISTING PROCEDURE FOR PROTECTING SURVEY MONUMENTS ALONG
MONTEREY BOULEVARD AND BAYVIEW DRIVE BETWEEN 16TH AND
19TH STREETS. Memorandum from Public Works Department
dated June 4, 1992. (Continued from May 26, 1992
meeting.)
(( 6 6-9
So ordered,
presented the staff
eepot/22-1=nded to Council questions.
-�-� 4-e- Cid
Comi g forward to iddress tfie Council n this item were:
Action: To receive and file the report, as recommended
by staff.
Motion , second . So ordered, noting the
objections of
r� � - ice � ��- � � � -1„/
7. REQUEST BY MULTIVISION TO MAKE A QUICK EXCAVATION ON
GREENBELT FROM 25TH STREET TO MANHATTAN BOUNDARY TO IN-
STALL A FIBER OPTIC CABLE. Memorandum from City Manager
Frederick R. Ferrin dated June 4, 199 ��
f't-tr"1/4 _ City Manager Ferrin presented the staff report and re-
sponded to Council estions.
Coming forward to address the Council on this item were:
.___,",..„--,--x-)
4,0 ...„..
,,,,,.._,
, ,.,,,..„)
, fie_.✓ , , /ti /�
d /.° ----X_
Le -
9
1""
C A
EPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING VEHICLE PARKING DIS-
TRICT AND BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS. Memo-
randum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated June
4, 1992. (Request by Mayor Essertier to continue this
matter to the June 23, 1992 meeting).
City Manager Ferrin presented the staff report and re-
sponded to Council questions.
Action: To approve the request of
installation of the Hermosa main
under a portion of the Greenbelt.
Motion , second
the objections of
Multivision for the
distribution cable
So ordered, noting
rJ /
Coming forward to address the Council on this item were* C
69
Action: To continue this matter to the meeting of June
23, 1992, as requested by the Mayor.
Motion , second . So ordered, noting the
objections of
Action: To
Motion , second
objections of
6//Y
/1_,t,,tt:4-z, 6./
. So ordered, noting the
9. RECOMMENDATION FROM PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY
RESOURCES COMMISSION REGARDING POTENTIAL USE OF SOUTH
SCHOOL SITE FOR RELOCATION OF CITY YARD. Memorandum
from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated June
1, 1992.
/(Qtv_
4
-2 e T4
•
Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff
report and responded to Council questions.
Coming forward to address the Council on this item were:
Action: To approve the
Recreation and Community
include the South School
site for the City Yard.
Motion i%% , second
objections of
Action: To
Motion , second
objections of
recommendation of the Parks,
Resources Commission to not
site as a potential relocation
. So ordered, noting the
. So ordered, noting the
10. SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 15, 1992.
A. STATUS REPORT ON FISCAL IMPACT AND GENERAL PLAN
CONSISTENCY OF THE OPEN SPACE BALLOT MEASURE.
Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach
dated June 1, 1992.
Planning Director Schubach presented the report and re-
sponded to Council questions.
Action: To receive and ile the report.
Motion ,4 , second J . So ordered.
B. APPROVE ATTACHED ELECTION BUDGET, APPROVE FINAL
WORDING OF BALLOT MEASURE QUESTION, AND ADOPT THE
RESOLUTION CALLING ELECTION AND GIVING NOTICE, AND
CERTAIN OTHER RESOLUTIONS NECESSARY FOR THE SPECIAL
•
MUNICIPAL ELECTION, SEPTEMBER 15, 1992. Memorandum
from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated June 3,
1992.
City Clerk Doerfling presented the staff report, and she
and City Attorney Vose responded to Council questions.
Coming forward to address the Council on this item were:
d19 -
-_ yet7 j — 4'"
-� a'
Action: To approve the proposed budget for the special
election and authorize the City Clerk to retain the ser-
vices of Martin & Chapman Co. as the City's election
supplier and consultant.
Motion hi , second �12. • So ordered, noting
the objections of E. ( .
Lb/EA CA ) je,
Further Action: To approve the final wording of the
6{//A. Yi--yr ballot measure question
as follows:
Motion /V, second ▪ So ordered, noting the
objections of
Further Action: To determine the hours of the opening
and closing of the polls to be 7:0 A.M. to 9:00 P.M.
Motion i7,7 , second gee . So ordered, noting the
objections of
Further Action: To authorize Councilmember to
prepare and file a written argument against the ballot
measure, with all Councilmembers invited to sign.
Motion i1,7 , second 45 . So ordered, noting the,.rytia
objections of
- 12 - /2p ��.-�
•
Further Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-55?7, enti-
tled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF
THE HOLDING OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD
IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 1992, FOR THE
SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF A PETITION INITIATIVE MEA-
SURE RELATING TO OPEN SPACE ON THE BILTMORE SITE."
Motion , second . So ordered, noting
the objections of
Further Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-55' enti-
tled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY,OF LOS ANGELES TO RENDER
SPECIFIED SERVICES TO SAID CITY RELATING TO THE CONDUCT
OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY
ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 1992."
Motion , second . So ordered, noting
the objections of
Further Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-5559, enti-
tled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING
A WRITTEN ARGUMENT REGARDING A CITY MEASURE SUBMITTED AT
THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER
15, 1992, AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS."
Motion , second So ordered, noting
the objections of
Further Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-5550, enti-
tled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF
REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR A CITY MEASURE SUBMITTED AT THE
SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 15,
1992."
Motion , second So ordered,
noting the objections of
Further Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-556/, enti-
tled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CANVASS OF THE
SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, SEP-
TEMBER 15, 1992, TO BE MADE BY THE CITY CLERK."
Motion , second So ordered,
noting the objections of
Final Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-5552, enti-
tled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE COMPENSATION` TO BE
RECEIVED BY THE CITY CLERK FOR THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION OF SEPTEMBER 15, 1992," with said compensation
fixed at $ per month for months, com-
mencing on , 1992, and ending on , 1992.
Motion , second . So ordered, noting
the objections of /00/3E_
- 13 -
11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
(a)
Notification of absences of Board of Parking Place Com-
missioner. Memorandum from Acting General Services Di-
rector Henry L. Staten dated June 3, 1992.
Acting General Services Director Staten presented the
staff report and responded to Council questions.
Action: To receive and file the report.
Motion , second . So ordered, noting the
objections of
Action: To remove Gerald Compton from the Board of
Parking Place Commissioners. (REQUIRES 4/5 VOTE)
Motion , second . The motion carried/
failed with the dissenting votes of
13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items:
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to
discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back
on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun-
cil action tonight.
(a) Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of request-
ing the City Manager to ask the Coastal Commission for
permission to pave the Biltmore Site for parking and not
encumber it in the future for use for development.
9 (vim • / •�-�' / - 14 -
•
,22
/9 ,/J ��- -7•w
Action: To
Motion , second So ordered, noting the objec-
tions of
(b) Request by Councilmember Midstokke for discussion of
vehicles parking on front lawns.
L
/77i E-01 coe
- ‘,7. --a>
Action: To
e-A??;"?'� Motion , second So ordered, oting the
objections of
Alt.t/L4PY
044-
/l•
(c)
Request by Councilmember Wiemans for discussion of 5 ft.
height reduction in R-3 and R -P zones. Memorandum from
Councilmember Wiemans dated June 4, 1992.
Action: To
Motion , second So ordered, noting the
objections of
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within
the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time.
Please limit comments to three minutes.
Coming forward to address the Council at this time were:
Z.7
A96"
PA7 CP 4,—D .r
A
- 15 -
ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City
of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, June 10,
1992, at the hour of j/ : fl A.M. to
City Clerk
ACTION SHEET
ACTION SHEET
REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, June 9, 1992 - Council Chambers, City Hall
Closed Session - 6:45 p.m.
Regular Session - 7:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: ALL PRESENT
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
r'
q5
JUNE WILLIAMS - RE. COUNCILMEMBERS DRINKING ALCOHOL IN PARK.
ELEANOR LYNN - RE. NEWS ARTICLE ON CLOSING OF ALPHA BETA. SAID
MR. BACON STATED INCORRECTLY THAT INGRESS AND EGRESS IS THE PROB-
LEM. CITY PAID HALF OF COST FOR STUDY THAT SAID NO SIGNAL WAR-
RANTED. ALSO HOPES COUNCIL WILL LOOK NEGATIVELY AT ALLOWING HIM
TO PUT IN A CAR DEALERSHIP.
JIM ROSENBERGER - RE. COASTAL HEARING ON GREENBELT. PER COMMIS-
SION'S ORDERS, GREENBELT TO BE OPENED AT LEAST UNTIL JULY HEAR-
ING. WANTS TO KNOW HOW QUICKLY THIS WILL BE DONE.
HOWARD LONGACRE - COMPLIMENTED STAFF ON EXCELLENCE OF AUDIO AT
BUDGET WORKSHOP MEETING.
ALSO SPOKE ABOUT MOTION AT WORKSHOP ABOUT VIOLATING LAW.
JOHN HALES - RE. MISUSE OF CITY SEAL AS IT RELATES TO COLOR.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
(a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of
the City Council held on May 26, 1992.
CONTINUE TO JUNE 23 MEETING.
(b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants
Nos. through inclusive.
(c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future
Agenda Items.
(d) Recommendation to receive and file the May, 1992 invest-
ment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L.
Brutsch dated June 2, 1992.
(e)
Recommendation to adopt resolution to participate in Los
Angeles County Interim Paratransit Plan for Disabled.
Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated
May 19, 1992.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION 92-5543.
(f)
(g)
(h)
Recommendation to receive and file letter from Caltrans
re. Pacific Coast Highway curb parking prohibition.
Memorandum from City Traffic Engineer Ed Ruzak dated May
27, 1992.
Recommendation to authorize the Mayor to sign a Grant of
Easement to GTE correcting an existing telephone pole
line easement at South School property. Memorandum from
Public Works Department dated May 19, 1992.
Recommendation to adopt resolution amending the Master
Fee Resolution No. 90-5422 to allow a reduced fee for
fence and wall conditional use permits. Memorandum from
Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 1, 1992.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION 92-5544.
(i)
Recommendation to adopt resolution approving City's par-
ticipation in the Los Angeles County Transportation Com-
mission's subregional mobility program to receive addi-
tional funds for Dial -A -Ride Program. Memorandum from
Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 1, 1992.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION 92-5545.
(i)
(k)
(1)
Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the
City of Hermosa Beach and the Los Angeles County Bar
Association Dispute Resolution Services, Inc. for space
in the Community Center. Memorandum from Community
Resources Director Mary Rooney dated June 1, 1992.
Recommendation to approve lease agreement between South
Bay Free Clinic and City of Hermosa Beach for use of
Room 7 in the Community Center. Memorandum from Com-
munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated June 1,
1992.
Recommendation to adopt resolution of intent to study
elimination of Hermosa Beach City Code Section 7.2-27
regarding conditional approval of condominium conver-
sions. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated June 2, 1992.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION 92-5546.
(m)
(n)
Recommendation to receive and file report on construc-
tion of Owosso storm drain project. Memorandum from
Public Works Department dated June 1, 1992.
Recommendation to award contract for Third Party Ad-
ministration of Liability Claims to Ward -THE and au-
thorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a
three year contract. Memorandum from Risk Manager Rob-
ert Blackwood dated June 3, 1992.
- 2 -
PULLED BY SE -
MOTION RE/SE TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH COLIN & LEE FOR ONE
YEAR. OK 3-2 (AW/KM-NO) RE COMMENTED HE THINKS IT IS A GOOD
EXERCISE TO OCCASIONALLY HAVE A CHANGE IN FIRMS.
(o)
Recommendation to extend for thirty days the temporary
appointment for the Acting General Services Director.
Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat-
ed June 2, 1992.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES.
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 92-1069 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7,
ARTICLES I, II, III, IV, AND CHAPTER 24 OF THE CITY CODE
RELATING TO BUILDING AND PLUMBING REGULATIONS AND ADOPT-
ING WITH CERTAIN ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND AMENDMENTS,
THE RULES, REGULATIONS, PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS SET
FORTH IN THOSE CERTAIN CODES ENTITLED, "UNIFORM BUILDING
CODE, 1991 EDITION", "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS,
1991 EDITION", "UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, 1991 EDITION", AND
"UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS,
1991 EDITION", PROMULGATED AND PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNA-
TIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS AND THE "UNIFORM
PLUMBING CODE, 1991 EDITION" AND "UNIFORM MECHANICAL
CODE, 1991 EDITION", PROMULGATED AND PUBLISHED JOINTLY
BY THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND
MECHANICAL OFFICIALS AND THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF
BUILDING OFFICIALS. For adoption.
MOTION RB/SE TO REINTRODUCE DELETING ALL AMENDMENTS TO THE CODE.
VOTE: FAILS 1-4 (RB -ONLY YES)
MOTION KM/SE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE. OK 4-1 (RB -NO)
(b) ORDINANCE NO. 92-1070 - AN ORDINANCE REPEALING EXISTING
CHAPTER 12 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE IN ITS
ENTIRETY AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, THE 1991 EDITIONS OF
THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, INCLUDING APPENDIX CHAPTERS III-
A, III -B, III -C, VI -A, VI -C AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE
STANDARDS, AS AMENDED. For adoption.
MOTION KM/AW TO ADOPT ORDINANCE - OK 4-1 (RB)
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
* Public comments on items removed from the Consent
Calendar.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS.
(a)
Letter from June Williams, 2065 Manhattan Avenue, dated
June 1, 1992 regarding comments made at last Council
meeting concerning her property.
NO ACTION.
3
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M.
NONE
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
5. REVIEW OF ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR 2930 THE STRAND.
Memorandum from Public Works Department dated June 4,
1992. (Continued from May 26, 1992 meeting.)
MOTION AW/SE TO RECEIVE AND FILE. VOTE: 4-1 (RB -NO)
6. RECOMMENDATION RE. REPORT ON SURVEYING DISCREPANCIES AND
EXISTING PROCEDURE FOR PROTECTING SURVEY MONUMENTS ALONG
MONTEREY BOULEVARD AND BAYVIEW DRIVE BETWEEN 16TH AND
19TH STREETS. Memorandum from Public Works Department
dated June 4, 1992. (Continued from May 26, 1992
meeting.)
MOTION KM/AW TO HAVE STAFF IMMEDIATELY PROTECT THE FOUR SUBJECT
MONUMENTS AND TO HAVE STAFF PROTECT OTHERS AS THEY COME ACROSS
THEM, ALSO TO HAVE STAFF ADDRESS THE CITY WIDE SURVEY PLAN UNDER
THE PROPOSED CIP BUDGET AT OUR NEXT WORKSHOP. SO ORDERED.
7. REQUEST BY MULTIVISION TO MAKE A QUICK EXCAVATION ON
GREENBELT FROM 25TH STREET TO MANHATTAN BOUNDARY TO IN-
STALL A FIBER OPTIC CABLE. Memorandum from City Manager
Frederick R. Ferrin dated June 4, 1992.
CITY MGR. SPOKE TO SEVERAL CONCERNS: THERE ARE GOING TO BE THREE
SMALL VAULTS, WANTS TO MAKE SURE THAT THE THREE LIDS ON THE
VAULTS ARE WELL BURIED ON THE GREENBELT; ALSO WANT TO MAKE SURE
THERE IS A PLAN FOR REIMBURSEMENT OR NOTIFICATION OF SUBSCRIBERS
IN CASE RECEPTION IS INTERRUPTED; ALSO RESTRICT THE USE OF THE
FIBER COAXIAL CABLE TO USES AS CONTAINED IN THE TERMS AND CONDI-
TIONS OF THE CITY'S FRANCHISE AGREEMENT. WOULD ALSO SEE THAT
BONDS WERE POSTED. THINKS THE INSTALLATION WILL BE A BENEFIT TO
CITY AND ALSO TO MULTIVISION.
MOTION KM/AW - TO APPROVE REQUEST WITH THE CITY MANAGER'S THREE
CONCERNS: THE VAULTS AND THEIR DEPTH, NOTIFICATION OF SUB-
SCRIBERS, AND OF THE FIBER OPTICS BEING LIMITED TO USES THAT ARE
APPROVED AS TO THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT, THAT PROPER BONDS OR IN-
SURANCE LIABILITY BE POSTED. ALSO WOULD LIKE STAFF TO GO OUT AND
TAKE ABOUT 10 TO 20 PICTURES OF HOW THE GREENBELT LOOKS TODAY
BEFORE THEY START DIGGING UP, BECAUSE THIS REQUIRES THEM TO RE-
STORE IT THE WAY IT WAS, SO IT CAN BE DETERMINED IF ANY CHANGE
NOTED, OK 4-1 (RE -NO).
DON GRANGER - FRANCHISE AGREEMENT CONTAINS
PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT.
RE - THINKS THIS IS GOOD TIME FOR CITY GET
REFUSAL FROM MULTIVISION TO CONTRIBUTE ANY
SHOULD BECOME PART OF THIS ACTION.
4
A COMMITMENT OR
EQUIPMENT. THINKS IT
DON GRANGER SAID WOULD BE MORE APPROPRIATE TO REQUEST IN CONJUNC-
TION WITH CONTRACT RENEWAL NEGOTIATIONS.
KM SUGGESTS ASKING THE QUESTION OF CABLE TV BOARD ON WHETHER
THERE IS A WAY TO SPEED UP THE NEGOTIATING PROCESS. SO DIRECTED
BY RE.
8. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING VEHICLE PARKING DIS-
TRICT AND BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS. Memo-
randum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated June
4, 1992. (Request by Mayor Essertier to continue this
matter to the June 23, 1992 meeting).
MOTION RE/SE TO SCHEDULE AS PUBLIC HEARING. OK 4-1 (KM -NO)
PUT NOTICE IN PAPER JUNE 18 FOR JUNE 23 HEARING DATE.
9. RECOMMENDATION FROM PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY
RESOURCES COMMISSION REGARDING POTENTIAL USE OF SOUTH
SCHOOL SITE FOR RELOCATION OF CITY YARD. Memorandum
from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated June
1, 1992.
MOTION KM/AW FOR RECOMMENDATION OF PARKS & REC. COMM. SO
ORDERED.
10. SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 15, 1992.
A. STATUS REPORT ON FISCAL IMPACT AND GENERAL PLAN
CONSISTENCY OF THE OPEN SPACE BALLOT MEASURE.
Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach
dated June 1, 1992.
MOTION KM/AW TO RECEIVE AND FILE. SO ORDERED.
B. APPROVE ATTACHED ELECTION BUDGET, APPROVE FINAL
WORDING OF BALLOT MEASURE QUESTION, AND ADOPT THE
RESOLUTION CALLING ELECTION AND GIVING NOTICE, AND
CERTAIN OTHER RESOLUTIONS NECESSARY FOR THE SPECIAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION, SEPTEMBER 15, 1992. Memorandum
from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated June 3,
1992.
MOTION KM/RE TO APPROVE RECOMMENDATION NO. 1. OK 4-1 (SE)
RB WANTS US TO PURSUE LEGALLY TO TRY TO GET A DECLARATORY RELIEF.
TO TRY TO GET A WAIVER TO HOLDING THE SPECIAL ELECTION. SECOND
SE. VOTE: 2-3 (AW/KM/RE-NO) MOTION FAILS.
MOTION SE/RB HAVE A SUBCOMMITTEE AND CITY ATTY. MAKE A CONFERENCE
CALL TO "GURU" FOR CLEAR OPINION. OK
MOTION KM/SE TO APPROVE FINAL WORDING OF BALLOT MEASURE QUESTION.
MOTION KM TO APPROVE HOURS OF POLLS TO 7 A.M. TO 8 P.M.. SECOND
SE. SO ORDERED.
- 5 -
MOTION KM/RB
ARGUMENTS AS
MOTION KM/AW
ORDERED.
COUNCIL DECLINES TO WRITE AN ARGUMENT. NOT INVOLVE
A COUNCIL. OK 3-2 (RE/SE NO)
TO ADOPT RESOLUTIONS 92-9947 THROUGH 92-9951. SO
MOTION SE/KM TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 92-9952 FIXING COMPENSATION FOR
CITY CLERK FOR SPECIAL ELECTION. SO ORDERED.
11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
(a)
Notification of absences of Board of Parking Place Com-
missioner. Memorandum from Acting General Services Di-
rector Henry L. Staten dated June 3, 1992.
MOTION KM/RE - TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
SO ORDERED.
13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items:
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to
discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back
on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun-
cil action tonight.
(a)
Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of request-
ing the City Manager to ask the Coastal Commission for
permission to pave the Biltmore Site for parking and not
encumber it in the future for use for development.
MOTION RB/SE ASK CITY MGR. TO ASK COASTAL COMM. IF WE CAN USE
BILTMORE SITE FOR PARKING NOW AND NOT ENCUMBER IT FOR FUTURE, AND
INCLUDE WHETHER WE HAVE TO REPLACE THE PARKING SOMEWHERE ELSE IF
WE REMOVE IT. MOTION FAILS (KM/RE/AW-NO).
(b) Request by Councilmember Midstokke for discussion of
vehicles parking on front lawns.
MOTION KM TO DO A RESO. OF INTENT TO MAKE WHATEVER CHANGE IS
NECESSARY TO MAKE PROHIBITION FROM ZONING CODE TO SOMEWHERE ELSE
IN CODE WHERE IT CAN BE A TICKETABLE OFFENSE INSTEAD OF A
MISDEMEANOR.
MOTION KM/SE TO SEEK OUT ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE TO MAKE IT AN IN-
FRACTION. SO ORDERED.
(c)
Request by Councilmember Wiemans for discussion of 5 ft.
height reduction in R-3 and R -P zones. Memorandum from
Councilmember Wiemans dated June 4, 1992.
NO ACTION.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
- 6 -
RB ASKED ABOUT CHANGE OF PROCESS FOR CUPS.
BETTY MARTIN - SPOKE ABOUT LACK OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION
ACTIONS. ALSO WHAT ABOUT APPRAISAL AT BILTMORE SITE.
JERRY COMPTON - QUESTIONED WHY APPRAISAL HAS NOT BEEN DONE. UP-
SET ABOUT LACK OF ACTION BY COUNCIL.
Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within
the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time.
Please limit comments to three minutes.
ADJOURNMENT AT 11 P.M. TO SECOND BUDGET MEETING SET FOR 7:30 P.M.
JUNE 18.
ADJOURN AT 11 P.M.
7
Ce-,-/t-Y <41 .&, .S/-21
/9/9.)-'
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: City Clerk
DATE: June 4, 1992
SUBJECT: June 9, 1992 Agenda Item 1(a) -- 5/26/92 minutes
Due to the absence of the Deputy City Clerk (who is on a two-week
vacation) and the priority of other duties of office, I am unable
to have the minutes of the meeting of May 26, 1992 prepared for
Council approval at its meeting of June 9, 1992. They will be
presented for approval at the following meeting of June 23, 1992.
Thank you.
Elaine Doerflin
Cit. Clerk
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 17:42:78
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 05/28/92
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN it AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
toro-67 /,/9
PAGE 0001
DATE 05/28/92
INV/REF PO # CHK *
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
H BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. 00630 305-400-8406-4201 00093 410,378.00 08093.00 04866
FINAL PMT/SEWER PROJECT 93.00 05/21/92 CIP 88-406 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
H EL CAMINO COLLEGE BOOKSTORE
MATERIALS FEE/POST CLASS
04657 001-400-2101-4312
05/19/92 POLICE
$10,378.00
01947 495.97
/TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT
PAYROLL/5-1 TO 5-15-92
00243 001-202-0000-2030
05/18/92
$95.97
00483 $296.390.55
/ACCRUED PAYROLL
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
*296,390.55
40865
05/28/92
04547 40861
$0.00 05/28/92
�.r
40860
40.00 05/28/92 -'4
H JAY*PATRICK 04859 42,200.00 26020 04456
WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 26020 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
04655 001-210-0000-2110
05/21/92
H PUB EMPLOYEES
RETIREMENT/APR
H PUB EMPLOYEES
RETIREMENT/APR
H PUB EMPLOYEES
RETIREMENT/APR
H PUB EMPLOYEES
RETIREMENT/APR
H PUB EMPLOYEES
RETIREMENT/APR
H PUB EMPLOYEES
RETIREMENT/APR
H PUB EMPLOYEES
RETIREMENT/APR
RETIREMENT SYS.
IL 92
RETIREMENT SYS.
IL 92
RETIREMENT SYS.
IL 92
RETIREMENT SYS.
IL 92
RETIREMENT SYS.
IL 92
RETIREMENT SYS.
IL 92
RETIREMENT SYS.
IL 92
00026 001-222-0000-2222
05/26/92
$2,200.00
00011 *65.914. 37CR
/DEFERRED PERS CREDIT
00026 001-400-1213-4180 00592
05/26/92 RETIREMENT
00026 001-400-1213-4180 00593
05/26/92 RRETIREMENT
00026 105-400-2601-4180 00176
05/26/92 STREET LIGHTING
00026 109-400-3301-4180 00046
05/26/92 VEH PKG DIST
00026 110-400-3302-4180 00180
05/26/92 PARKING ENF
00026 145-400-3401-4180 00152
05/26/92 DIAL A RIDE
$95,435.71
/RETIREMENT
439, 101. 50CR
/RETIREMENT
$1,145.32
/RETIREMENT
$186.90
/RETIREMENT
$5,051.92
/RETIREMENT
$229.19
/RETIREMENT
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0. 00
$0. 00
$0.00
I V
1
40864
05/28/92
40866
05/28/92
40866
05/28/92
40866
05/28/92
tail
r
40866
05/28/92, w
40866
05/28/92
40866 L.
05/28/921-
40866
05/28/92'. •
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 17:42:58
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/APRIL 92
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/APRIL 92
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/APRIL 92
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/APRIL 92
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/APRIL 92
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/APRIL 92
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/APRIL 92
H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.
RETIREMENT/APRIL 92'
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 05/28/92
VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00026 145-400-3402-4180 00152
05/26/92 ESEA
00026
. 05/26/92
145-400-3403-4180 00101
BUS PASS SUBSDY
00026 145-400-3408-4180 00021
05/26/92
COMMUTER XPRESS
00026 155-400-2102-4180 00151
05/26/92 CROSSING GUARD
00026 160-400-3102-4180 00177
05/26/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN
00026 170-400-2103-4180 00051
05/26/92
SPEC INVESTGTNS
00026 705-400-1209-4180 00101
05/26/92 LIABILITY INS
00026 705-400-1217-4180 00101
05/26/92 WORKERS COMP
$30.40
/RETIREMENT
$19. 91
/RETIREMENT
$12.76
/RETIREMENT
$142. 45
/RETIREMENT
$1,016.44
/RETIREMENT
$5,309.58
/RETIREMENT
$301. 90
/RETIREMENT
$413. 21
/RETIREMENT
PAGE 0002._
DATE 05/28/9211
:l
INV/REF PO M CHK M i
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***************************** ► ►***ar** ►**** ►** ***»r*****r********** $4,279.82
H SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT
CITATION COURT BAIL
00400 110-300-0000-3302
05/21/92
45668 $397.00
/COURT FINES/PARKING
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $397.00
H STEVE*WISNIEWSKI
SPEC INVESTIGATION FUNDS
01364 170-400-210'3-4322 00058 $34,000.00
05/20/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /UNCLASSIFIED
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $34,000.00
*** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $347,741.34
R A & E TROPHIES
02744 001-400-4601-4308 00682 $216.50
MISC. CHARGES FOR MAY 92 10855 05/07/92 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS
40866 ' ...
$0.00 05/28/92H
i
$0.00
$0.00
$0. 00
$0. 00
$0.00
$0. 00
$0. 00
40866
05/28/92H
40866 �•„I
05/28/92H
40866
05/28/92,,
40866
05/28/92
40866
05/28/921-
40866
05/28/92
40866
05/28/92
03394 40863
$0.00 05/28/92
04191 40862
$0.00 05/28/92
10855 00050
$0.00
40871
05/28/921
1
FINANCE-5FA340
TIME 17:42:56
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 05/28/92
VND $* ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********* ►******• * ►* ►** ►* ►***** ►• * *** ►** ►*•r•w***** ** ** w******** ***
R ADAMSON INDUSTRIES
MISC. CHARGES FOR APR 92 5554
R ADAMSON INDUSTRIES
MISC. CHARGES FOR APR 92 5577
00138 001-400-2101-4309
04/28/92 POLICE
PAGE 0003.,
DATE 05/28/92]
INV/REF PO * CHK *
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$216. 50
00512 $111.00
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
00138 001-400-2201-4309 0130B $118.07
04/29/92 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS
RADIO REPAIR/PARKING
$229. 07
00935 110-400-3302-4307 00059 $225.41
45211 05/27/92 PARKING ENF /RADIO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R APOLLO LEASING COMPANY LTD
LEASE PMT/JUNE 92 -1969
$225. 41
02558 001-400-3104-6900 00096 $855.11
05/20/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /LEASE PAYMENTS
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R B. M. *BARSOUM
WORK GUARANTEE REFUND /5082
$855. 11
5554 00043 40872
$0.00 05/28/92
5577 00043
40872
$0.00 05/29/92
45211 03398 40873
$0.00 05/28/92
0969/88-1969 00066 40874
$0.00 05/28/92 •
03926 001-210-0000-2110 04861 $1,500.00 32791/5082 04451 40875
05/14/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 05/28/92 :.
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R BAY PACIFIC PROPERTIES
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 42600
04664 001-300-0000-3115
05/13/92
$1, 500. 00
04729 $75.20
/BUSINESS LICENSE
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R BLACKTOP MATERIALS CO.
MISC. CHARGES FOR APR 92 24532
$75. 20
04352 001-400-3103-4309 01368 $49.10
04/29/92 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R CHAD*BROWN
BASKETBALL TOURNEY DIR.
$49. 10
04661 001-400-4601-4201 01379 $420.00
05/11/92 460004 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
642600 04308 40876
$0.00 05/28/92H
24532 00049
40877
$0.00 05/28/92
04935 40878
$0.00 05/28/92:
I'„
0
4
S
411.
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 17:42:58
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 05/28/92
VND Ik ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ k ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL *************a*******►***************•******************************•
*
* * *
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER
02016
PETTY CASH/4-28 TO 5-13 • 05/14/92
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016
PETTY CASH/4-28 TO 5-13 05/14/92
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016
PETTY CASH/4-28 TO 5-13 05/14/92
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016
PETTY CASH/4-28 TO 5-13 05/14/92
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016
PETTY CASH/4-28 TO 5-13 05/14/92`
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016
PETTY CASH/4-28 TO 5-13 05/14/92
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016
PETTY CASH/4-28 TO 5-13 05/14/92
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016
PETTY CASH/4-28 TO 5-13 05/14/92.
VENDOR TOTAL ************************************
R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY
001-400-2101-4305
PAGE 0004 ;\
DATE 05/28/92 •.
INV/REF PO * CHK
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$420.00
01777 $11.76
POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
001-400-2101-4306
01179 438.84
POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE
001-400-2101-4312 01948 $8.00
POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST
001-400-2201-4316 00340 $6.00
FIRE /TRAINING
001-400-4101-4305 00622 $11.13
PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
001-400-4201-4305 00770 $2.00
BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
001-400-4202-4305 00701 $22.50
PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
001-400-4601-4308 00683 $18:65
COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS
********************************
$118.88
00034 001-400-1202-5401 00029 $204.59
DESK CHAIR /FINANCE 85097 04/30/92 FINANCE ADMIN/EQUIP-LESS THAN $500
•
VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
WATER BILLING/ MAY 1992 00290
R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
WATER BILLING/ MAY 1992 00290
R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE
WATER BILLING/ MAY 1992 00290
$204. 59
00016 001-400-3101-4303 00208 $575.03
05/15/92 MEDIANS /UTILITIES
00016 001-400-4204-4303 00564
05/15/92 BLDG MAINT
00016 001-400-6101-4303
05/15/92 PARKS
03854 40879 1. ,
$0.00 05/28/921,
03854 40879
$0.00 05/28/92:
03854 40879
$0.00 05/28/92 j• 3
03854 40879
$0.00 05/28/92.
03854 40879
$0.00 05/28/92 I.,,,
03854 40879
$0.00 05/28/921
03854 40879 I
$0.00 05/28/92:-
03854 40879
$0.00 05/28/92
185097 02796 40880
$204.59 05/28/92
r.
08000000290 00511
$391.94 08000000290
/UTILITIES
08000000290
00436 $1,865.66
/UTILITIES
$0.00
40881 !.
05/28/92:•
00511 40881
$0.00 05/28/92H
00511 40881
$0.00 05/28/92:
•
•
• •.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 17:42:58
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 05/28/92
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***************•r**** *** ** **** *************** w*******************
PAGE 0005 _
DATE 05/28/921
INV/REF PO # CHK # .I,
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$2,832.63
R WILLIAM*CAMPBELL 04662 001-210-0000-2110 04862 $600.00 32809/50B9 04450 40882
WORK GUARANTEE REFUND /5089 05/14/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 05/28/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R CHAMPION CHEVROLET
MISC. CHARGES FOR MAY 92
00014 001-400-2101-4311
05/21/92 POLICE
$600.00
01424 •32.33
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R COAST GLASS COMPANY
MISC. CHARGES FOR APR 92 07977
00325 001-400-2101-4311
04/28/92 POLICE
$32. 33
01425 $10.83
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
* * *
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
CONNECTING POINT LEASING
COMPUTER RENT/MAY 92 78327
CONNECTING POINT LEASING
COMPUTER RENT/MAY 1992 78327
CONNECTING POINT LEASING
COMPUTER RENT/MAY 1992 78327
CONNECTING POINT LEASING
COMPUTER RENT/MAY 1992 78327
VENDOR
TOTAL
03617 001-400-2101-4201
05/18/92 POLICE
03617 001-400-2201-4201
05/18/92 FIRE
*10.83
01030 $489. 57
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PR
00304 $159.40
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PR
03617 001-400-2701-4201 00049
05/18/92
CIVIL DEFENSE
03617 170-400-2103-4201 00118
05/18/92
SPEC INVESTGTNS
•
********************************************************************
$330. 18
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PR
IVAT
40,
00513 40883 �..
$0.00 05/28/92:- •
07977 00416 40884
$0.00 05/28/92
3478327 00051 40885 ;
$0.00 05/28/92;
3478327
IVAT
IVAT
00051 40885
$0.00 05/28/92
3478327 00051 40885
$0.00 05/28/92
$159.39 3478327
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
THE *DEVELOPMENT
MISC. CHARGES FOR APR 92
THE *DEVELOPMENT
MISC. CHARGES FOR APR 92
00147 001-400-2101-4305
1015 04/30/92 POLICE
00147 001-400-2101-4306
1015 04/30/92 POLICE
THE *DEVELOPMENT
MISC. CHARGES FOR APR 92 1015
00147 001-400-2201-4305
04/30/92 FIRE
$1,138.54
00051 40885
$0.00 05/28/92
•
•
01776 $52.39 1015 00420 40886
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 05/28/92 •
01177 $51.07 1015 00420 40886
/PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 05/28/92 . •
00562 $12.88 1015 00420 40886
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 05/28/92
„ •
•
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 17:42:58
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R THE *DEVELOPMENT
MISC. CHARGES FOR APR 92 1015
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 05/28/92
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT. DESCRIPTION
PAGE 0006-,
DATE 05/28/92 \
INV/REF PO it CHK * '
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
00147 001-400-4201-4305 00769 $45.90
04/30/92 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPLY
MISC. CHARGES FOR APR 92 66237
*** VENDOR TOTAL
$162.24
04394 001-400-2201-4309 01310 $56.99
04/29/92 FIRE
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
COPIER MAINT/APR 92 12264
R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
COPIER METER USE/MAR 92 12264
02840 001-400-1208-4201 00873
05/03/92 GEN APPROP
02840 001-400-1208-4201 00874
05/03/92 GEN APPROP
$56.99
1015 00420 40886
$0.00 05/28/92
066237 00422 40887
$0.00 05/28/92
$283.00 006M12264
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$415.52 006M12264
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $698.52
R STEVE*FILLMAN 03169 001-400-4601-4201 01380 $480.20
V -BALL TOURNEY DIRECTOR 05/12/92 460004 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $480.20
R FRIDEN ALCATEL
POSTAGE METER SUPPLIES
00425 40888
$0.00 05/28/92;
00425 40888 '
$0.00
05/28/92!•
04940 40889
$0. 00 05/28/92
03998 001-400-1208-4305 01078 $54.21 P114913001 08063
13001 05/07/92 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $49.26
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
00015
05/31/92
00015
05/31/92
001-400-1101-4304 00466
CITY COUNCIL
001-400-1121-4304 00519
CITY CLERK
00015 001-400-1131-4304 00376
05/31/92
CITY ATTORNEY
00015 001-400-1141-4304 00534
05/31/92
CITY TREASURER
$54.21
$7.82
/TELEPHONE
$23. 69
/TELEPHONE
$9. 01
/TELEPHONE
$18. 12
/TELEPHONE
40890
05/28/92H
00530 40892
$0.00 05/28/92
.00530 40892
$0.00 05/28/92h
00530 40892
$0.00 05/28/92
00530 40892
$0.00 05/28/921 ,
w
•
•
•
•
4111.
41.
•
w
•
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 17:42:58
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHCS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHCS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHCS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA,
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
INCORPORATED
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 05/28/92
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00015
05/31/92
00015
05/31/92
001-400-1201-4304 00573
$15.92
CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE
001-400-1202-4304 00591
$62.87
FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-1203-4304 00596 $56.12
05/31/92 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE
00015
05/31/92
00015
05/31/92
001-400-1206-4304 00494
$247.13
DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE
001-400-1207-4304 00398 $20.15
BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-1208-4304 00219 $9.51
05/31/92 GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-2101-4304
05/31/92 POLICE
01033 $928.84
/TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-2201-4304 00443 $74.43
05/31/92 FIRE /TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-2401-4304 00458 $34.72
05/31/92 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-4101-4304 00593 $78.74
05/31/92 PLANNING /TELEPHONE
00015
05/31/92
00015
05/31/92
001-400-4201-4304 00532
BUILDING /TELEPHONE
001-400-420-4304 00626
PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE
$125.15
$328.90
PAGE 0007 , •
DATE 05/28/92
INV/REF PO !F CHK N...
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
00015 001-400-4204-4321 00654 $24.07
05/31/92 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT
00015
05/31/92
001-400-4601-4304 00686
$99.80
COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE
00015 001-400-6101-4304 00420 $9.01
05/31/92 PARKS
/TELEPHONE $0.00 05/28/92 .•'
•
00530 40892
$0.00 05/28/92
00530 40892
$0.00 05/28/92
00530 40892
$0.00 05/28/92
00530 40892
$0.00 05/28/92
00530 40892
$0. 00'x^. 05/28/92:
00530 40892
$0.00 05/28/92
00530 40892
$0.00 05/28/92
00530 40892
$0.00 05/ 28/92
00530 40892
$0.00 05/28/92
00530 .. 40892
$0.00 05/28/92i-
00530 40892
$0.00 05/28/92
00530 40892
30.00 05/28/92 . •
00530 40892
$0.00 05/28/92
00530 40892
$0.00 05/28/92
00530 40892
VIP
444
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 17:42:58
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
TELE CHCS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
TELE CHGS/MAY 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
TELE CHCS/HAY 92
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 05/28/92
VND tk ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4 AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROD * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00015 109-400-3301-4304 00050 410.00
05/31/92 VEH PKG DIST /TELEPHONE
00015 110-400-3302-4304 00595 4276.65
. 05/31/92 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE
00015 145-400-3401-4304 00114 44.16
05/31/92 DIAL A RIDE /TELEPHONE
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R HAMILTON GREGG BREWWORKS, INC
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 39078
04663 001-300-0000-3115
05/13/92
PAGE 0008. _.
DATE 05/28/92
i��
INV/REF PO * CHK *
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP I,• _
*2. 464. 81
04730 $141.75
/BUSINESS LICENSE
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R HERMOSA BCH CITY SCHOOL DIST.
FIELD MAINT/ JUNE 1992
02066 001-400-6101-4251
05/28/92 PARKS
$141.75
00530 40892
40.00 05/28/92
00530 40892
40.00 05/28/92;
00530 40892
40.00 05/28/92
39870/39078 04309 40893
40.00 05/28/92
00012 $1,100.00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,100.00
R HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
COMPUTER SYS MAINT/MAY92 01T44
00074 40894
*0.00 05/28/92
00149 001-400-1206-4201 00984 $1,202.00 2801T44 00009
05/05/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,202.00
R . INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
DISCOUNTS OFFERED
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
DISCOUNTS TAKEN
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
MISC. CHARGES FOR MAY 92
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
MISC. CHARGES FOR MAY 92
R INGLE_WOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
MISC. CHARGES FOR MAY 92 •
02458 001-202-0000-2021 00214
05/21/92
$15.01
DISCOUNTS OFFERED
02458 001-202-0000-2022 00210 $15.01CR
05/21/92 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN
02458 001-400-3104-4309 00897
05/21/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY
02458 001-400-4204-4309 02342
05/21/92 BLDG MAINT
02458 105-400-2601-4309 00814
05/21/92 STREET LIGHTING
$117.96
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$59.65
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$559.25
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
40895
05/28/92
00537 40896
$0.00 05/28/92;'
00537 40896
*0.00 05/28/92'.
00537 40896
*0.00 05/28/921
00537 40896 .
$0.00 05/28/92'
00537 40896
*0.00 05/28/92
40.
•
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 17:42:58
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH •
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0009.,
FOR 05/28/92 DATE 05/28/921:
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # +
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***sir*********************************its►*r********w*****************
*736. 86
R DUTCH*KUFLAK 02776 001-210-0000-2110 04863 *2,500.00 26036/4960 04455 40897
WORK GUARANTEE REFUND /4960 • 05/14/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00 05/28/92. •
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$2,500.00
R STEVE*LEGARE 00734 001-210-0000-2110 04865 $11.728.25 32753/4969 04453 40898
WORK GUARANTEE REFUND /4969 05/14/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00 05/28/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$11,728.25
R MANHATTAN FORD 00605 001-400-2101-4311 01423 $6.04
MISC. CHARGES FOR MAY 92 23769 05/07/92 POLICE
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
R MANHATTAN FORD 00605 110-400-3302-4311 00791 $499.04
REPAIR PKG METER VAN 23169 04/20/92 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
*505. 08
123769 00546 40899
*0.00 05/28/92
123169 03380 40899
3499.03 05/28/92
R MARX BROTHERS 03183 001-400-4204-4321 00653 $150.00 111482 04863 40900
SEMI—ANN HOOD INSPECTION 11482 05/18/92 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT $150.00 05/28/92 :•
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$150.00
R MAXIMUS HAIR SALON 04667 001-210-0000-2110 04868 $250.00 31909 04452 40901
BANNER DEPOSIT REFUND 31909 05/14/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 05/28/92 •;'
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************4***********
R DEAN*MENART
PER DIEM ADVANCE
$250.00
02625 170-400-2103-4316 00018 $115.75
TR408 05/04/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /TRAINING
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$115.75
TR408 00408 40902
*0.00 05/28/92.
R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. 03080 001-141-0000-1401 00179 *3.549.33 920261 04865 40903
UNLEADED GAS/CITY YARD 20261 05/18/92 /GASOLINE INVENTORY $0.00 05/28/92
•
vla
•
IIIt
•
•
•
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 17:42:58
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 05/28/92
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************•*•************************
R KURT*MICHEL
PER DIEM ADVANCE
PAGE 0010
DATE 05/28/92i, a.
INV/REF PO * CHK *
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP H.
$3,549.33
02719 170-400-2103-4316 00020 $115.75
TR407 . 05/28/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /TRAINING
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R BRENDAN*MOIR
LIGHT TECH/5-4 TO 5-10
$115.75
04660 001-400-4601-4201 01378 $467.50
05/18/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************a********************
R MONARCH BROOM
MISC. CHARGES FOR APR 92 8722
00084 001-400-3103-4309 01369
$467.50
$248. 98
04/29/92 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R NORTH SUPPLY
PHONE HOUSING/PD/PIER
$248. 98
02273 001-400-4204-4309 02344 $210.94
69730 04/30/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R OLIVER, BARR & VOSE
LEGAL SERVICES/APRIL 92
R OLIVER, BARR & VOSE
LEGAL SERVICES/APRIL 92
R OLIVER, BARR & VOSE
LEGAL SERVICES/MARCH 92
$210. 94
02892 001-400-1131-4201 00718 $1,312.50
04/30/92 420001 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
02892 001-400-1131-4201 00719 $12,050.25
04/30/92 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
02892 001-400-1131-4201 00720 $11,732.50
03/31/92 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE_/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $25,095.25
R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE
COMPUTER HOOKUPS—PD/MAY 8579S
00321 001-400-2101-4304 01032 $150.50
05/07/92 POLICE
/TELEPHONE
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R PACIFIC CORRUGATED PIPE CO.
CORRUGATED PIPE/SEWERS 19661
TR407 00407 40904
$0.00 05/28/92...
04941 40905
$0.00 05/28/92i
8722 00449 40906
$0.00 05/28/92
869730 04834 40907
$210.94 05/28/92' 1
02149 40908
$0.00 05/28/92 ,1
02149
40908
$0.00 05/28/92N
04632 40908
$0.00 05/28/92
3372518058579S 00036 40909 .I
$0.00 05/28/92.
$150. 50
04606 160-400-3102-4309 00700 $123.91
04/30/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
19661 04822
$196.46
e
I `
40910 H
05/28/920
i'^I i
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0011..,
TIME 17:42:58 FOR 05/28/92 DATE 05/28/92C
PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * '...
• DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD 3 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************** ►***** ***war******** * $123.91
R PACIFIC EQUIP & IRRIGATION 00406 110-400-3302-4311 00792 *133.70 03379 40911
CUSHMAN PARTS/PKC ENF 04/21/92 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE $133.70 05/28/921,
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $133.70
R PAK WEST 00519 001-400-4204-4309 02341 *185.45 819486/818696 00454
MISC. CHARGES FOR APR 92 18696 05/07/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL
********************************************************************
*185. 45
40912
05/28/921
R PORTERS ALIGNMENT & BRAKE SERV 03910 110-400-3302-4311 00793 *35.00 0725/3385 03385 40913
✓ PARKING VAN ALIGNMENT /3385 05/12/92 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE 335.00 05/28/921•
YI
•
WO
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R RADIO SHACK
MISC. CHARGES FOR MAY 92 0261
$35.00
01429 001-400-1206-4305 00556 $45.25
05/21/92 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
R RADIO SHACK 01429 001-400-4204-4309 02339 *33.92
MISC. CHARGES FOR MAY 92 0261 05/21/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL
* * *
********************************************************************
*79. 17
R RADISSON HOTEL 04658 170-400-2103-4316 00021 *316.80
HOTEL ADV/MF_NART/MICHEL TR407 05/28/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /TRAINING
VENDOR TOTAL
$316.80
R RADISSON HOTEL 04659 170-400-2103-4316 00023 *316.80
HOTEL ADV/WRIGHT/VINCENT TR405 05/28/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /TRAINING
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** 3316.80
R RESULTS BY DESIGN 03283 001-400-4601-4302 00184 *700.00
TYPESET SUMMER BROCHURES 05/14/92 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING
0261 00558 40914
$0.00 05/28/92
0261 00558 40914
30.00 05/28/92
TR407 00407 40915
*0.00 05/28/92
TR405 00405 40916
*0. 00 05/28/92
03784 40917
$700.00 05/28/92
ea!
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 17:42:58
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 05/28/92
PAGE 0012._.
DATE 05/28/921'
VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK *
DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP /
*** VENDOR TOTAL $700.00
R ED*RUZAK ?. ASSOCIATES 01578 001-400-3104-4201 00123 $825.00 92203 04861
TRAFFIC ENG SERV/APR 92 92202 04/30/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/28/92'
40918 '
*** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************************************.***
$825. 00
R S. A. F. E. R. 03070 001-400-2201-4315 00084 $20.00
ANNUAL DUES/LICKHALTER 05/18/92 FIRE /MEMBERSHIP
*** VENDOR TOTAL $20.00
03452 40919
$0.00 05/28/92
R SETON NAMEPLATE COMPANY 04315 705-400-1209-4305 00070 $20.30 73525-0-01 04621 40920
SEAT BELT WARNING LABELS -0-01 05/01/92 LIABILITY INS /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $13.15 05/28/92••
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.30
* * *
i
R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-400-4204-4309 02343 $81.47 25-57639 00561 40921 ♦
MISC. CHARGES FOR MAY 92 57639 05/06/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 05/28/92
VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $81.47
R BLAIR*SMITH 04665 001-210-0000-2110 04867 $50.00 39467 03856 40922
ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 39467 05/21/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 05/28/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$50.00
R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL 00107 001-400-2101-4201 01032 $504.50 04189 40923
PRISONER EMERG SERVICES 03/19/92 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/28/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $504.50
R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 110-300-0000-3302 45669 $16,672.00 04721 40924
CITE SURCHARGE/APRIL 92 05/19/92 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 05/28/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$16,672.00
R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00400 110-300-0000-3302 45670 $340.00 03396 40925
CITATION COURT BAIL 05/21/92 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 05/28/92$•
i/
0
Oft
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 17:42:58
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 05/28/92
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN if AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
PAGE 0013
DATE 05/28/92
INV/REF PO * CHK
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$340.00
R SOUTH BAY VACUUMS 03502 001-400-4204-5401 00021 $714.45
VACUUMS/PUBLIC WORKS 1821 05/18/92 BLDG MAINT/EQUIPMENT—LESS THAN $500
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R SOUTH DAY WELDERS
MISC. CHARGES FOR APR
R SOUTH BAY WELDERS
MISC. CHARGES FOR APR
R SOUTH BAY WELDERS
MISC. CHARGES FOR APR
R SOUTH BAY WELDERS
MISC. CHARGES FOR APR
$714.45
00018 001-400-2201-4309 01309 $7.04
92 05/21/92 FIRE
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
00018 001-400-3103-4309 01367 $15.00
92 05/21/92 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
00018 001-400-3104-4309 00896 $15.00
92 05/21/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
00018 001-400-4204-4309 02340 $86.92
92 05/21/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 92
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 92
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
ELECTRIC BILLING/MAY 92
$123.96
00159 001-400-3104-4303 00116 $132.94
05/27/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /UTILITIES
00159 001-400-6101-4303 00435 $29.06
05/27/92 PARKS /UTILITIES
00159 105-400-2601-4303 00362 $77.01
05/27/92 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES
*** VENDOR TOTAL************************************************t*******************
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO.
GAS BILLING/APRIL 1992
$239. 01
00170 001-400-4204-4303 00565 $43.46
05/21/92 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R SRF_CO FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS
FOOTAGE COUNTER/SEWERS 44291
$43.46
1821 04846 40926
$0.00 05/28/92
00465 40927
$0.00 05/28/92
00465 40927
$0.00 05/28/92
00465 40927
$0.00 05/28/92
00465 40927 •,
$0.00 05/28/92:
00566 40928
$0.00 05/28/92H-
00566
5/28/92! j-
00566 40928 ''I
$0.00 05/28/921,,ls.
I
00566 40928
$0.00 05/28/92
00467 40929
$0.00 05/28/92'
01207 160-400-3102-4309 00701 $174.14 244291 04850 40930
04/14/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 05/28/92
I II
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 17:42:58
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R SRECO FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS
SEWER RODS/WRENCH 10042
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 05/28/92
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 11 AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
INV/REF PO
AMOUNT UNENC
01207 160-400-3102-4309 00702 41,357.89 •
04/07/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL**************.n***************.************************************,*
R ST. BERNARD HIGH SCHOOL
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 36497
04019 001-210-0000-2110
05/21/92
41, 532. 03
•
PAGE 0014;;
DATE 05/28/92: •
CHK *
DATE EXP I.
I,
10042 04824 40930 I.,;
$1.300.30 05/28/92;••
I.
04866 4500.00 36497 03855 40931
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 40.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R STEPHENS, INC.
PRISONER SUPPLIES
01029 001-400-2101-4306
05/07/92 POLICE
4500. 00
01178 $1,689.65
/PRISONER MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R THOMAS*STUBBS
WORK GUARANTEE REFUND /4961
'04228 001-210-0000-2110
05/14/92
41.689.65
05/28/92
03197 40932
$1,587.09 05/28/92
04864 $2,500.00 26037/4961 04454
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 40.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC.
MOVIE RENTAL/COMM RES 65854
*** VENDOR TOTAL
42, 500. 00
40933
05/28/92'
41,
03158 001-400-4601-4201 01381 4182.00 565854 04942 40934
05/09/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/28/92' P
********************************************************************
R ! TODD PIPE & SUPPLY
DISCOUNTS OFFERED
00124 001-202-0000-2021
9187H 05/05/92
R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY
DISCOUNTS TAKEN 9187H
R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY
MISC. CHARGES FOR MAY 92 9187H
R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY
MISC. CHARGES FOR MAY 92 9187H
00124
05/05/92
1
001-202-0000-2022
00124 001-400-6101-4309
05/05/92 PARKS
00213
00209
01252
00124 160-400-3102-4309 00699
05/05/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN
4182. 00
43.60 38900H/39187H 00573 40935
05/2B/92 •
DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00
43.60CR 30900H/39187H 00573
/DISCOUNTS TAKEN
4100.04 38900H/39187H
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
40935
40.00 05/28/92 •
00573 40935
40.00 05/28/92
476.67 38900H/39187H 00573 40935
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R OFCR WILLIAM*VINCENT
PER DIEM ADVANCE
$176.71
40.00 05/28/92
02251 170-400-2103-4316 00019 4115.75 TR406 00406
TR406 05/04/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /TRAINING 40.00
•
1 . •
40936 1
05/28/92!
•
•
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 17:42:58
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 05/2B/92
VND IP ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ 11 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***************************** ►****+r**** ►** ►****a********************
R TERRY*WETKOWSKI
04666 001-210-0000-2110
05/14/92
PAGE 0015.
DATE 05/28/92!`
I,
INV/REF PO * CHK *.....i^.
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*115. 75
04860 *1,600.00 26024/4956 04449
WORK GUARANTEE REFUND /4956 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 40.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R WHITLOW EMERGENCY MEDICAL GRP
PRISONER EMERG SERVICES 22507
*** VENDOR TOTAL
03457 001-400-2101-4201
04/12/92 POLICE
$1,600.00
40937
05/28/92
01031 4120.00 0325-922507 04190 40938
05/28/92!
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 40.00
R MS SILVIA*WILFREDO
CITE PAYMENT REFUND
04656 110-300-0000-3302
03626 05/26/92
*120.00
45667 428.00 1803626 04724 40939
/COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 05/28/92'.
I .•
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
* * *
R
R
R
R
SGT MARK*WRIGHT
PER DIEM ADVANCE
SGT MARK*WRIGHT
AIRFARE/M. WRIGHT
*28.00
00133 170-400-2103-4316 00022 *115.75
TR405 05/28/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /TRAINING
00133 170-400-2103-4316 00024 $145.35
TR4O5 05/28/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /TRAINING
VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
WRITERS CINEMA
FILMING PERMIT REFUND 36529
WRITERS CINEMA
04650 001-300-0000-3418
05/11/92
$261. 10
00494 $407.25
/SPECIAL EVENTS
04630 . 001-300-000D-3823 00130
05/11/92 •
$258.75
FILMING PERMIT REFUND 36529 /SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R XEROX CORPORATION
COPIER SUPPLIES
62717
00135
05/14/92
R XEROX CORPORATION 00135
COPIER SUPPLIES 62717 05/14/92
001-400-1208-4305 01077
GEN APPROP
001-400-2401-4305 00220
ANIMAL CONTROL
$666. 00
TR405 00405
TR405 00405 40940
$0.00 05/28/92
40940 I
$0.00 05/28/92 .•
36529 04938 40941
$0.00 05/28/92
36529 04938 40941
40.00 05/28/92
$930.96 146862717 04719 40942
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $1,303.34 05/28/92
$83.59 146862717 04719
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $83.59
40942
05/28/92
4
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 17:42:58
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R XEROX CORPORATION
COPIER SUPPLIES
R XEROX CORPORATION
COPIER SUPPLIES
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 05/28/92
VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00135 001-400-4601-4305 01062
62717 05/14/92 COMM RESOURCES
00135 110-400-3302-4305 00904
62717 05/14/92 PARKING ENF
PAGE 001.6
DATE 05/28/921:."
INV/REF PO N CHK *
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*253.30 146862717 04719 `
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *253.30
40942
05/28/92
*169.71 146862717 04719 40942
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *169.71 05/28/92
*0* VENDOR TOTAL
*** PAY CODE TOTAL
*** TOTAL WARRANTS
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*1.437. 56
*93/026.88
$440/768.22
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS
THE WARRANTS LISTED ON r (.
WARRANT REGISTER FUR:
FUNDS ARE AVAILADLr.
r0 THE DIJDLET.
BY
FINANCE MEC I OR
DATE
c/iF/y),
OR CLAIMS COVERED BY
rO/1INCLUSIVE, OF THE
ARE ACCURATE,
..,i ARE IN CONFORMANCE,
•
•
L.'
1..
b
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 14:55:00
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
PAGE 0001
({1PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF P0 # CHK#c
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UPJEP•IC DATE EXP
H VAL*STRASER 04672 170-400-2103-4322 00060 $20,000.00 04200 40944
-SPEC INVESTIGATION FUNDS 06/04/92 SPEC--INVESTGTNS-7UNCLASSIFIED-- - -- - $0:00----06/04/92
, *** VENDOR TOTAL***•***********************•******************************•»*********** $20,000.00
*** PAY CODE_ TOTAL•***********•******************•************************************* $20,000.00
_ R ADAMSON INDUSTRIES 00138 001-400-2101-4309 00515 $126.55 00053 40949
_....._..__.___-___.._MISC:-
CHARGES / MAY 92 05/31/92 POLICE- /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -$0:00-- 06/04/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************•*********•***********************.**************** $126.55
R ADVANCE ELEVATOR 00003 001-400-4204-4201 00525 $90.00 00003 40949
VATO SERVICE/JUNE92- 05/20/92 - BLDG MAINT- 7CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT-.-__--._.___' -$0.00---..06/04/92_
*** VENDOR TOTAL*****•*************************************************************** $90.00
R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 00935 110-400-3302-4307 00061 $314.00 00058 40950
RADI MAINT/G. S. JUNE92 05/31/92 - PARKING ENF---- /RADIO--MAINTENANCE-....-._..--"-------"----':t0: 00"-x6/04/92 .
___*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $314.00
- R AMERICAN EAGLE 03118 145-400-3409-4201 00020 $350.00 04923 40951 ,
IDUS/COMM RES EXCURSION 05/28/92 REC TRANSPTN-- -7CONTRACT SERVICE__/PRIVAT ---- .....,$350.00-----06/04/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $350.00
R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00857 001-400-2101-4306 01184 $63.00 00055 40952
-CHARGE5
MISC- 7 MAY 92 05/31/92---------- -- . POLICE------- PRISONER MAINTENANCE ----- ------40:'00---06/04/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $63.00
R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-2201-4309 01314 $58.40 00017 40953
,•. UTILITY RAG RENTAL/MAY ._......_.__.._... ------ -05/:3119? _........._. _... FIk'E-.._......_._._..._!MAINTENANCE-MATERIALS-- ---- -
$0.00 -06104792
-, R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-3104-4309 00901 $54.20 00017 40953
UTILITY -RAG RENTAL7MAY 05/31792 — RAFFIZ SA
I ANCE-MATERIALS U. U0 U67'04/92. -
6i 04/92.
0
,.:
2
J
z
•
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 14:55:00
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
FAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
R ARATEX/RED
UTILITY RAG
R ARATEX/RED
_ .
UTILITY RAG
STAR INDUSTRIAL
RENTAL/MAY
00152
05/31/92
STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152
RENTAL/MAY 05/31/92
R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL
PAGE 0002
DATE 06/04/92
INV/REF PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC • DATE EXP ,
_ .
001-400-4204-4309 02357 $196.38 00017 40953
BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS' --06-/o4/92
00017 40953
$0.00 -06/04/92',,
001-400-4205-4309 00648 $62.60
EQUIP SERVICE /MKINTENANCE'HATERIALS
00152 110-400-3302-4309 00843
05/31/92 - PARKING' .ENF
$8.80 000.17 40953
/MAINTENANCE :MATER I ALS. $0.00-06704/92
. _.
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $380.3e
R AT & SF RAILWAY CO.
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
R AT & SF RAILWAY CO.
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
• R AT & SF RAILWAY CO.
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
00028 001-400-1212-4188 02397 $850.67 00041 40954
06/04/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEEBENEFITS --- --- -- --$0.-00 ---0.6/04/92 ,•:.
00028 105-400-2601-4188 01287 $29.61 00041 40954
. .
06/04192 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 40.00- 06/04/92..
00028 109-400-3301-4188 00273 $2.65
06/04792
R AT & SF RAILWAY CO.
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
R AT & SF RAILWAY CO.
CIT,7-REAUTITINS/JUNE-V2
R AT & SF RAILWAY CO.
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
VEH PKG DIST ---7EMPLOYEFI BENEFITS
00041 40954
$0. 00 06/04/92
00028 110-400-3302-4188 01549 $126.40 00041 40954
06/04/92 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 40. Oci---"W;704;'9g 7;
00028 145-400-3401-4188 01301 $4.25
06/04792 DIAL A RIDE /EMI5D3YEE-BENEFIT8
00028 145-400-3402-4188 01288
06/04/92 ESEA
R AT P1 SF RAILWAY CO. 00028
CITY -HEALTH INSTJUNE 92 06/04/92
R AT & SF RAILWAY CO.
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
00041 40954
$0700 06704/92
$0.44 00041 40954
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
145-400-3403-4188 00458 $0.53
BU 8 PASS SUBSDY-7EMPECNEEBENEPITS
00041 40954
$0700 D6/04/92
00028 145-400-3408-4188 '00102 $0.26 00041 40954
06/04/92 COMMUTERkPRES-7EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS---------------- 40:0006/04/92
R AT & SF RAILWAY CO. 00028 155-400-2102-4188 00800 $1.77
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
AT & SF RAILWAY CO.
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
06/04/92 CROSSINO-tUARD--7EMPCOYEE-BENEFITS.
00041 40954
$0.00---06704/92
J•
00028 160-400-3102-4188 01265 422.54 00041 40954
06/04/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS0. 00-06704/92.,
• R AT & SF RAILWAY CO. 00028 170-400-2103-4188 00273 $3.48
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92 06/04/92 SPEC INVESTOTNS-7EMPEOVEE-BENEFITS
00041 40954
$0. -00--0670-4792
�
rIwAwns-aFA340
TIME 14:55:00
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
n
AT & SF RAILWAY CO.
-----nzrv-*sAcr*-zwo/zuws-p2
AT & SF RAILWAY CO.
-- oIr/Hs^Lrn INS/JUNE 92
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
00028 705-400-1209-4188 00570
06/04/92-------------zzAoIczrv-zwo
n
PAGE 0003
DATE 06/04/92
INV/REF PO # CHK #
AMOUNT owswnDATE EXP
__�
$4.*oouo�z «opo�
T � —
-A
00028 705-400-1217-4188 00633 *16.63
**° VENDOR TOTAL
n
AVIATION LOCK & KEY
n CHARGES/MAY-1992-
AVIATION LOCK & KEY
lwrecouAeGsg7mAv-1992-
• AVIATION LOCK & KEY
-
MISC. CHARGES/MAY 1992
�n AVIATION LOCK & KEY
--oHAnosa7nAY-I992
00407 001-400-2101-4309 00514 *31.23
05/31/92 POLICE- -/MAINTENANCE•MATERIALS
00041
*o.00'
40954 ...°~
oa/o«/v2..�
"
00057 40955
00407 • 001 02354 $108 .17 00057 40955 ^'
05/31ocoo-mAz mTsmAwos-m^rsnzm-o-----'-----*uon---oa/o41vo%
oo4o7 105-400-2601-4309 00817 *56.05
05/31/92-------- STREET LIGHTING 7muIwTswAwos-nATseIALo
00407
110-400-3302-4309 00842 *22.46
pAnpzma-swh /MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS
°°* VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
BALL INDUSTRIES
MAINT-SUPP7PUD WORKS
$217.91
n
00057 40955
*0`00-06/04/92:.
00057 40955 -
00232 001 02355 *574.97 669707 04854 40956
69707 —05/207-92 BLDG MA/NT- /MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS *574797--o6/o4792
__ __��*_vsmDOR'rorAL*****°*°*°***************�***°**°*************°********************
02154 00112 $417.96., 992 05731792
��o���z�
EQUIP SERVICEAnMsmro
.~.
*** vswoon TOTAL *****************************°***********°**************************
'
411.
•••
~
OP
C'w
,
n ANC ONE LEASING CORPORATION
CEASE PAYMENT/PD. CARS
n oAwo ONE LEASING CORPORATION
LEASE—PAYMENT/PD. -CAne-----
03422 001-400-2101-6900 00594
05/3f792 POLICE
03422 170-400-2103-6900 00014
-05/31/92— — SPEC INVESTGTNS
$417.96
*22.o1as9
7cEAaE-p4vmEwTs
**° VENDOR TOTAL °*°*****°^**°***°*******°*°*****°** *31.248.99
''
~
^',�
00030 40957 �
w07D0---06704p92��`
00070 40958
00070 40958
n oosAw°oIoELow AaaonzArso04443 001-400-1121-4201 00059 *3.420.50
---nsuonoawomT PMT. uo:6-' -6-----O5/31792----------cITv-ocsnK-----7oowrnAor-SsnvICs/pnIvAr
6 00073 40959
1
°
•_.
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 14:55:00
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
*4* VENDOR TOTAL********4***********************************************************
PAGE 0004
DATE 06/04/92
INV/REF PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$3, 420. 50
R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA_
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
01308 00.1-40.0-1212-4188 0240.8 $65.61
06/04/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 145-400-3401-4186 01308 $0.35
-" -` CITY -HEALTH INS7JUNE 92 06./04/92----------- DIAL A RIDE %EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA_
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
01308 145-400-3402-4188 01294 $0.14
06/04/92 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$66. 10
00055 40960
$0. 00 --- 06/04/92
00055 40960
00055 40960
$0.00 . 06/04/92
R BLUE SHIELDPREFERRED
---CITY HEALTH_ INS/JUNE 92
R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
01293 001-400-1212-4188 02399 $17,197.72
06/04/92 EMP'BENEFITS__ EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
01293 110-400-3302-4188 01551 $1,086.93
06/04/92 PARKINOTENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
01293 145-400-3403-4188 00459 $1.5.72
06/04/92 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED 01293 160-400-3102-4188 01267 $81.84
ClTV-RV FL-IN57JUt 92
R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
RI BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITV-HEACTR-INS/JUNE-92
9
:l
00056 40961
$0.00 -06/04/92
06704792- SEWER/Sl 0RAIN--7EF LDVEE-BENEFITS
01293 170-400-2103-4188 00275 $264.12
06/04/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS %EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
01293 705-400-1217-4188 00635 $141.51
06704792 woRRERStnmis /EMPLOYEE -BENEFITS
00056 40961
$0. 00. 06/04792
0.0056 40961
$0.00-06/04/92
00056 40961
30.00 06/04/92
00056 40961
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $18,787.84
R BROWNING tr. FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00155 001-400-1206-4201 00877
TRASI-f PICKUP`JUNE-92
R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES
TRASH PICKUP/JUNE 92
05/31792- GEN APPROP
$578.37
/CONTRAST-SERVICE7PRIVAT
00056 40961
4.0.00 06/04792
00005 40962
$0.00 06/04/92
00155 109-400-330.1-4201 00124 • $516.63 00005 40962
05/31/92 • VEH PKG DIST CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT...- _$O:Ca--136704792
*** VENDOR TOTAL it******************.*****.********************************************
$1, 095. 00
1.1
R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES
TRASH PICKUP/SO. SCHOOL 20400
00158 305-400-8506-4309 00066 $139.85 920400 04875 40963 ,,�
CIP 06--- 7MAINTENANCE' MATERIALS" $0:00--06/04/92
•
•
•
•
•
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 14:55:00
PAY
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
PAGE 0005
GATE 06/04/92
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4$ CHK #
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$139..85
tie
BSI CONSULTANTS, INC.
TRAFF SURV/PCH/AVIATION 82915 --
00630 001-210-0000-2110 04874
05/26/92.......
R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. 00630
TRAFF SURV/PCH/AVIATION - 82915-- 05/26/92-
001-400-3104-4201
5/26/92-
001-400-3104-4201
-.... -------TRAFFIC
$3,315.00 82915 03686 40964
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $3,315.00 '06/04/92
00125 $3,315.00 82915 03686 40964
--SAFETY ---/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT --$3:315: 00 06704/92
..I
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
_. $6,630.00
R JAMES*BUROUE
----THEATRE TECH/5-16--92
6
I
02544 • 001-400-4601-4201 01387 $71.50 04945 40965
-05/28/92- -- - -`COMM RESOURCES-7CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT - - $0:00- 06704/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC.
- --- MEDIAN MAINT7MAY-92
00599 001-400-3101-4201 00113
05/31792 MEDIANS
$71. 50
$3,800.00
/CONTRACT SERVICE7PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R CANADA LIFE
-CITY-HEALTH 1NSTJUNE-92
00046 001-400-1212-4188 02404
06/04792 EMP BENEFIT'
$3,800. 00
$619. 20
/EMPLOYEE -BENEFITS
_ R CANADA LIFE 00046 170-400-2103-4188 00279 $96.75
---CITY HEALTH INSTJUNE 92 06/04/92 SPECTINVESTGTNS-7EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS----._.-_-"--..--..--.$0:_.G0-06704/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
00044 40966 y
$0. 00-06/04/92 ,i
00008 40967
$O:OU 06/04792
00008 40967
$715. 95
0
R JEANNE*CARUSO 03293 001-400-2101-4316 00906 $58.89
REIMB MATERIALS/SPR 92 05/26792--- - ' POLICE- - --STRAINING
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$58.89
04196 40968
$0:00---06/04/92-
$58.89
0:00--06704/92
* * *
R CHAMPION CHEVROLET
MISC:T CHARGES / MAY --92
00014 001-400-2101-4311 01429 $57.87
05/31/92 POLICE -----/AUTO-MAINTENANCE
VENDOR TOTAL#*******'#**************#********************************************
$57. 87
00513 40969
$0.00 06/04/92
R CHEVRON USA, INC. 00634 170-400-2103-4310 00056 $577.21
WESTNET GASOLINE/MAY--92 05/31/92 SPEC-INVESTOTNS-7MOTOR-FOELS-AND LUBES
00515 40970
$07-00 06704/92•;:
'l
J
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 14:55:00
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
PAGE 0006
DATE 06/04/92
.
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
LI
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
.__. __ ._.
. i •
Li
, ! *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $577..21
2
3
,
;
n
i • •
R DALE & BARNEY'S TELEVISION 02362 001-400-1101-4305 00430 $122.50 K -07027S-6 04867 40971
—TAPE 'MACHINE REPAIR 27S-6 05/14/92 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER-SUPPLIES $150.00 06/04/92.
Lj*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $122. 50
111
i R DEPARTMENT OF THE CORONER 03673 001-400-2101-4201 01037 $13.01 172 04195 40972 ,
_.. .
. — — — -- AUTOPSY REPORT/POLICE ---i72----— 05/20/92 —. —.. •-• • POLICE /CONTRACTSERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 06/04/92,
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $13.01 ..:
•
• ,
• R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 00267 001-400-3104-4251 00099 $541.65 121895 04877 40973 ,
. ......_
HWY MINT:/APRIL 92 21895 05/22/92-- TRAFFICSAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT . $0i00.--06/04/92,
1:.. R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 00267 105-400-2601-4251 00169 $541.64 121895 04877 40973 ,
—HWY—HATNT77
APRIL 92 -21895 05/22/92 STREET CIOHTINO—TCONTRACT—SERVItE700Vr— ---- —30700 06704/92 :.
14
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $1,083.29 1,
R KAZEM*DERIS 04671 001-300-0000-3841 00418 $36.50 04198 40974 .1
, RSFUND—T0WrN0—FEES 05/27/92 /FOLICE—TOWINO 30. 00-06/047927,
,
R KAZEM*DERIS 04671 110-400-3302-4201 00344 $70.00 04198 40974 ,
REFUND TOWING FEES 05/27/92 PARKING ENF /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0: 00---06/04/92
.:,
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $106.50 ,
Li REASTMAN, INC. 02514 001-400-1208-4305 01081 $791.84 00524 40975 :,
MISC-.--SUPPLIES/ MAY 05/31/92 GEN APPROP-- /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES' $0. 06/04/92.00
•:,
VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $791.64
:., ,
R EFRAM MOBIL 01400 001-400-2101-4310 00358 $222.22 00528 40976
MISC. GASOLINE/MAY 92 05/31/92 POLICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 30.00 06704/92,:;
, *** VENDOR TOTAL ********;0*********************************************************** $222.22 ,
J,
51 R ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 02354 001-400-3103-6900 00106 $1,736.78 00043 40977 ,
LEASE PAYMENTiJUNE 1992 05/31/92 ST—MAINTENANCE /LEASE PAYMENTS 30.00 06/04/92
/0
71
7z
)
0
e
.0)
e
A!,
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME_ 14:55:00
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************************** -n****************»********
EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICES INC.
JANITOR SERV/MAY 1992
PAGE 0007
DATE 06/04/92
INV/REF PO # CHK # �'
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP '
$1, 736. 78
01294 001-400-4204-4201 00524 $1,460.00
05/31/92
BLDG MAINt /CONTRACT'SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************************************
$1,460.00
00039 40978
$0. 00 - 06/04/92
R GERBER AMBULANCE SERVICE 02897 001-400-2101-4201 01038 $270.25 124098 04194
PRISONER EMERG. SERVICE 24098 05/20/92 POLICE-7CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00-
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$270.25
40979
06/04/92: I
� J
0
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE
CITY HEALTH INS%JUNE
INSURANCE 04397 001-400-1212-4188 02403 $352.76
92 06/04/92 EMP BENEFITS_.....__ /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
--C ITY-HEALTH- INS7JUNE 92-
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY HEALTH-INS/JUNE 92
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY-FIEALTff-I NS7JON 92
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY--HEALTWTN87JUNE-92
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
04397 105-400-2601-4188 01292 $23.45
06/04/92 !-_.-STREET-LTGHTING-7EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
04397 109-400-3301-4188 00277 $2.10
06/04/92-_._.__...----VEH PKG DIST- 7EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -
04397 110-400-3302-4188 01555
06/04792- . ----PARKING-ENF
04397 145-400-3401-4188 01306
06/04/92 _.._...DIAL A RIDE ----
04397 145-400-3402-4188 01292
06704792 ESEA
$107.10
/EMPLOYEE -BENEFITS
$3. 36
-EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS-
$0. 22
/EMPLOYEE -BENEFITS
04397 145-400-3408-4188 00106 $0.14
06/04/92 COMMUTER-XPRESS-7EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS
04397 155-400-2102-4188 00804 $1.40
06/04792
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
411
C ITY- I -IEE LTH- INS7JUNE-92
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY HEALTH INS7JUNE-92
CROSSING -GUARD /EM-'LUYLE BENEFITS
04397 160-400-3102-4188 01271 418.69
06/04/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN-7EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
04397 170-400-2103-4188 00278 $26.25
06/04792 SPEC INVESTGTNS-7EMPLOYES BENEFTT5
00028 40980
-06/04/92
00028 40980
$0.00 06704/92 1
00028 40980
-$0.00-06/04/92,-,
00028 40980
40. 00-06/04/92
J
00028 40980
-$0:06-06/04/92
04/92
00028 40980
$0.0G---06704/92 .:.I
00028 40980
$0:00-06/04/92
00028 40930
$6700 06704/92
00028 40980
$0.00 06/04/92
00028 40980
$0.00 06704792
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 14:55:00
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
PAGE 0008
DATE 06/04/92
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
-----.-. --
• GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
• GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
04397 705-400-1209-4188 00374 $2.80
06/04/92
.INV/REF PO 4$ CHK *
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
1 .
LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
04397 705-400-1217-4188 00638 $3.50
06/04/92 --- WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
_ .
00028 40980
$0. 00 06/04/92
410
00028 40980
$0.00 06/04/92
$541.77 i
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
TELEPHONE CHARGES/MAY 05/31/92
• • - - • •
00015 001-400-2101-4304 01036
POLICE
• GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
TELEPHONE CHARGES/MAY
• GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
TELEPHONE CHARGES/MAY
00015 001-400-4202-4304 00628
05/31/92 PUB WKS ADMIN
00015
05/31/92
001-400-4204-4321 00657
BLDG MAINT
$68. 44 00530
/TELEPHONE $0.00
$47. 71
/TELEPHONE
00530
$38. 80
/BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT
!,1R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00688 $48.23
TELEPHONE CHARGES/MAY
1.)
-
1,1
05/31/92 COMM RESOURCES--7TELEPHONE
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
• GTEL
EQUIP. RENTAL/MAY 92
$203. 18
$0. 00
40981
06/04/92 • ;
40981 ,
06/04/92
00530 40981
$0.00* ' 06/04/92-
00530 40981
$0.00 06/04/92
01340 001-400-2101-4304 01037 $51.56 00533 40982
05/31/92 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 06704/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
$51. 56
R, GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH-INS/JURE 92
R GUARDIAN DENTAL .
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
R GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
02623 001-400-1212-4188 02398 $3,131.81
06/04/92
EMP- BENErfrg----7EMPLOYEE-DENEFrTS
02623 105-400-2601-4188 01288 $2.63
•
06/04/92 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
02623 110-400-3302-4188 01550 $105.36
0Z/04/92 PARK INT -EFF iEMPUOYEE-BENEF ITS
02623 145-400-3401-4188 01302
06/04/92
R GUARDIAN DENTAL * 02623
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92 06/04/92
DIAL A RIDE
145-400-3402-4188 01289
ESEA
$1. 32
/EMPLOYEE*BENEFITS
$0. 53
IEMPEOPEE-BENEFTTS
.11
-'•
00001 40983 ,
C3-,-00 06/04792-s;
00001 40983 •
$0. 0006/04/92
00001 40983
$0.00 06/04/92
00001 40983 ,fl
$0.00 -06/04/92*,.
00001 40983
01700 06/04792
GI
1.•
7.,
•
•
41.
•
w
V
F I NANC E-SFA340
TIME 14:55:00
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITYY-HEALTH-INS/JUNE-92
R GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
R GUARDIAN DENTAL
-----CITY HEALTH-INS/JUNE-92
R GUARDIAN DENTAL
—.CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
*** VENDOR TOTAL **************
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
PAGE 0009 �.
DATE 06/04/92
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
02623 160-400-3102-4188 01266 $19.39
06/04792----- --"SEWER/ST-DRAFT-7EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS- ----
02623 170-400-2103-4188 00274 $26.34
06/04/92 -- " - SPEC INVES'TOTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS"
02623 705-400-1209-4188 00571 $33.52
06/04/92 LIABILITY -INS 7EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS
02623 705-400-1217-4188 00634 $50.28
06/04792 ___.._.- - -_._WORKERS COMP-- -/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
******************************************************
$3,371.18
00001 40983
-$0..00-06/04/92
R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 00731 001-400-3103-4311 00763 $479.48
ELGIN SWEEPER PARTS 4221 --05/18/92 - ....ST MAINTENANCE' -/AUTO -MAINTENANCE-- .-.__-
*** VENDOR
TOTAL********************************************************************
$479. 48
00001 40983
$0.00- 06/04/92
00001 40983
s0 OG -06704/92
00001 40983
$0.00---06/04/92',.
4221 04864 40984
-$0.00-06104/92;,
R HEALTHNET
------CITY- HEALTH-INS/JUNE 92
R HEALTHNET
CITS HEALTH-INS7JUNE-92
R HEALTHNET
-CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
R HEALTHNET
CITY HEACTWINS/JUNE 92
R HEALTHNET
CITY HEALTH IN57JUNE 92
R HEALTHNET
CITY HEALTH-INS7JUNE-92
R HEALTHNET
-CITY HEALTH INS/"JUNE -92
R
HEALTHNET
CITY-HEALTH-INS7JUNE 92
00241 001-400-1212-4188 02401 $16,057.45
06/04/92---._..-__ ---- - EMP-BENEFITS-7EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00241 105-400-2601-4188 01290 $830.09
06/04792— STREETITGHTING-/EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS
00241 109-400-3301-4188 00275 $62.89
06/04/92 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE -BENEFITS- -- -"---
00241 110-400-3302-4188 01553 $2,247.51
06/04792
PARKING-ENF— EMPLOYEE-HENEFITS
00241 145-400-3401-4188 01304 $60.37
06/04/9------ —.-DIAL A RIDE- /EMPLOYEE -BENEFITS
00241 145-400-3402-4188 01290 $6.29
06/04792 ESEA /LMPLOYEE-BENEFITb
00241 145-400-3408-4188 00104 $3.77
06/04/92 COMMUTER-XPRESS 7EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00241 155-400-2102-4188 00802 $50.31
06/04792— CROSSING-GUARD--7EMNLUVtt i;ENttiis
00016 40985
---$0:00-06/04/92
00016 40985
$O. 00-06704792
00016 40985 •y
$0-::-00-06/04/92
00016 40985
$07-00 06 4792
00016 40985
$0:00-06704/92
00016 40985
$07-00 06T04/92
y,
•n
00016 40985
$0.00 06/04/92
00016 40985
SU.OU 06704792
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 14: 55:00
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
PAGE 0010
DATE 06/04/92
FAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R HEALTHNET
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
HEALTHNET
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
R HEALTHNET
CITY-HEALTR-/NSTJUNE-92
R HEALTHNET
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # z;
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP .
_. . . .
00241
06/04/92
AlA
160-400-3102-4188 01269 $503.09
SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00016 40905
$0. 00 d6/04/92
AP
00241 170-400-2103-4188 00277 $781.43 00016 40985
06/04/92 SPEC-INVESTGTNS7EMPLOYEE BENEFITS — $0.00— 06/04/92
AAA
00241 705-400-1209-4188 00572 $153.92
06/04192- LIABILITY /NS /EMFLINEE BENEFITS
00241
06/04/92
00016 40985
$0. 007--Z)6704792-:-,
AO!
705-400-1217-4188 00636
WORKERS COMP
$179.07 00016 40985
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 06/04/92
$20, 936. 19
23
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
DISCOUNT OFFERED
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
DISCOUNT TAKEN
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
MISC. CHARGES/MAY 1992
r•
.1
AO
02458 001-202-0000-2021 00217 $4.69
05/31/92
DISCOUNTS OFFERED
02458 001-202-0000-2022 00213 -$4.69CR
05/31/92 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN
02458 001-400-4204-4309 02353 $51.74
05/31/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE' ELECTRIC 02458
MISC. CHARGE57MAY-i-992 05/3f792
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
MISC. CHARGES/MAY 1992
105-400-2601-4309 00816 $227.45
STREET-LIGHTING-7MATNTENANCE -MATERIALS
00537 40986
00537 40986
06/04/92$0. 00
00537 40986
00537 40986 ,
40:000-6/04/92,,
AP
02458 305-400-8201-4309 00004 $178.78
05/31/92 MATERIALS ----------
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458
STREET -CITE -FIXTURE— 431658 05713792
305-400-8201-4309 00005
$450. 27
CIP S5=201 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
R INTERNATIONAL CONF OF BUILDING 00667
SEMINAR REG/P. CORNEAL 36344 05/21792
$908.24
001-400-4201-4316 00290 $190.00
BUILDING /TRAIN -INC,
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
$190. 00
00537 40986
-$0:00-06704/92,;
40658 04839 40986 ,
$450-727----0-6704/92
36344 02266 40987
$190700 U6/04792
R COUNTY OF*LOS ANGELES 00225
CHK SIGNATURES/BILTMORE 781-H 05/28/92
001-400-1122-4251 00013 $2,820.52
ELECTIONS /CONTRACT-SERYICE7GOVT
781-H 03901 40988
$27B03740-067104792,,,
-7
F I P t NC E-SFA340
TIME 14: 55:00
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
PAGE 0011
DATE 06/04/92
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ,
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$2,820.. 52
R MANHATTAN FORD 00605 170-400-2103-4311 00044 $625.79
REPAIR NARCOTICS --CAR -34352 05/11/92 -....._...._- - SPEC INVESTGTNS /AUTO MAINTENANCE ----
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$625. 79
34152
04182 40989
'6652.74 .._._ .06/04/92
R JOHN C.*MEENAN 04670 001-300-0000-3868 00083 $319.75 3866-3868 01981 40990
NOTICING FEE REFUND-- -3868 -------05/14/92
. . ---------%PUBLIC _NOTICING/300 FT _ __, - -- $0.00---06/04/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$319. 75
R KENNETH A.*MEERSAND
LEGAL SERVICE/ APRIL 92
04138 001-400-1132-4201 00110 $6,462.50
05/21/92 ....CTY PROSECUTOR 7CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$6,462.50
04197 40991
$0.-00- 06/04/92. !i
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. 00251 001-400-3104-4309 00902 $3,249.35 56687 04835 40992
----- --- - TRAFFIC PAINT/ PUB. WORK 56687 -05/117927 --- ------ TRAFFIC SAFETY %MAINTENANCE --MATERIALS ----- ---"" 43;249: 34---06/04/92��%
R MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. 00251 001-400-3104-4309 00903 $974.25 56685 04848 40992
TRAFFIC-PA-INT7PUB7-WORKS-56685 05/11792- TRAFFIC -SAFETY- --
7MAINTENANCEMATERIALS $974.25 U6704,'92
*** VENDOR TOTAL**#*****************************************************************
$4,223.60
R MYERS STEVENS & COMPANY 00091 001-400-1212-4188 02405 $772.20
CITY HEALTH -INS -/-JUNE 92 t6/04792 EMP BENEFITS-7EMNLUYEt BENEFITS-
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $772.20
00013 40993
$G700-657 0 4 7 9 2 •
R NATIONAL HOME LIFE 03465 ' 001-400-1212-4188 02407 $80.00
CITY HEALTH-INSTJUNE-92 06/04792 EMP-BENEFITS-7EMPLUYtt BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $80.00
;',
00065 40994
$U. UU U6704192:••,
R NEW PACIFIC LUMBER CO. 00606 001-400-3101-4309 00138
MISC. SERVICE/MAY 92 05/31792 MEDIANS
$40.60
/MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS
00551 40995
$U. UU U6/04/92, ..
J•
-40
'
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 14:55:00
1,1
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
PAGE 0012
DATE 06/04/92
PAY VENDOR NAME VND ft ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * • AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4$ CHK *
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ it ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 4
• . ,
s ,...
7
00606 001-400-6101-4309 01254 $40.59 • 00551 40995 .
05/31/92 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 06/04/92
R NEW PACIFIC LUMBER CO.
MISC. SERVICE/MAY 92
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
R PACTEL CELLULAR - LA
--MOBILE-PHONE-CHOS7MAY-92
$81. 19
03209 170-400-2103-4304 00050 $1,601.10
0573r7/2 spec INVE5TOINS iTECEPHCM
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
•. ,
R PAGENET
PAGING SERVICE/JURE-92
02487 001-400-1201-4201 00137
05/31/9g- CITY MANAGER
$1,601.10
511.00
/C0NTRA0T-BERVICE7PBWAT
00553 40996
0.00 ---067b47t72
00049 40997
*.O. 00- 06704/92-
R PAGENET 02487 001-400-1203-4201 00920 $11.00 00049
PAGING SERVICE/JUNE 92
05/31/92 PERSONNEL- ----- —7CONTkAcT SERVICE./PRIVAT
R PAGENET 02487
PAGING sLENTW7UUNC-92 05/3[792
R PAGENET
PAGING SERVICE/JUNE 92
R PAGENET
FAUIN0 gtRVICE/JUW 92
R PAGENET
PAGING SERVICE/JUNE 92
001-400-2101-4307 00323 $19900
POLICE ----7RADID-RAIRTENANCE
02487 001-400-2401-4201 00341
$11. 00
05/31/92 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR IVAT
02487 001-400-4202-4201 00375 $110.00
05/3i/92 PUB wK8-A0mIN---7C0NTRACT SERVIZE7PRIVAT
40997 ...
06)04/92.,
31
00049 40997 ,
$0. 00-0-6T04/92 ')
00049 40997
--------i•6766-----06764./9
00049 40997
40.00 06704792
3•I
.4Q
.•
4
4
4I
40
02487 001-400-4601-4201 01386 $22.00 00049 40997
05/31/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0:00---06/04/92: •
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $364.00
I I
R PEP BOYS 00608 001-400-2101-4311 01430 $59.95 00556 40998
CHARGES / MAY 92 05/31/92 POLICE' /AUTTMAINTENANCE. .4.0:00----06/04/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $59.95
R PHOENIX GROUP 02530 001-400-1206-4201 • 00986 $600.00 00075 40999
SOFTWARE MAINT/APR-JUNE-- DATA PROCESSING7CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRTVAT-----$0:0006704/92:..
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
$600. 00
R POSTAGE ON CALL 04091 001-400-1208-4305 01082 $2,008.00 51697214 08065 41000 ,..
----------- RESET POSTAGE METER 97214 04/30/92 GEN APPROP -7orptce OPER SUPOLIES- $0700-06/04/92..
4
.?
4
•
F I FIANCE-SFA:340
TIME 14:55:00
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
PAGE 0013
,\
4
0
Jr
U
J'
u,i I - vG/ V'1/Yc
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK 4*
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL • **************** **************** ******* ******** *******»** ***** $2,008..00
•
R PRESENTATION PRODUCTS, INC. 01176 001-400-2101-4201 01036 $98.12 04199 41001
LETTERING MACHINE REPAIR 06/02l42-- ----- POL_ICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 - 06/04/921
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $98.12
R RADIO SHACK 01429 001-400-4204-4309 02352 $33.88 00658
17
41002
-MISC.—CHARGES-MA47-JOKE 05/31/92 BLDG--MAINT /MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS. --- ---"-.-$0.-00---06704/92:
R RADIO SHACK 01429 • 001-400-4205-4309 00646 $17.58 00658
41002
MIEC-CHARGES-MAY/JUNE 05/31792 EQUIP-SERVICE-7MAINTENANCE-MATERIALS
$0.00 06704792
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $51.46
R KATHLENE*RIFE 04668 001-210-0000-2110 04875 $50.00 04458 41003
-------- -ANIMAL-TRAP-REFUND -ANIMAL-TRAP-REFUND
05/11792 /DEPOSITS/WORK-GUARANTEE $0. 00---06704/92,
*** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************•********************** $50.00 „
R RIVERSIDE COMM. COLL BOOKSTORE 03876 001-400-2101-4312 01951 $3.93 1586 04548
TUITION! - K MITCHELL 1586 04/20792 -- 41004
POLICE RKAVEC EXPENSE—POS1 $0700--06704792;;
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3. 93
R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 001-400-1212-4188 02400 $1,010.33 00019
41005 .,,,
CITY HEALTH INS7JUNE 92 06/04792--- EMP-DENEFITS--/EMPLDVEE-BENEFITS
$0700-06704792
— — R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 105-400-2601-4188 01289 $42.06
00019 41005
,_,+` - CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 42 06/04792---.-..-._-------STREET-LIGHTING--/EMPLOYEE-BENEFITS
$0.00 06704/92
R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 109-400-3301-4188 00274 $5.79
00019 41005
CITY_HEALTH INS/JUNE-92 06/04792 VEH PKG-DISI !EMPLOYEE -BENEFITS
$0700-06704792'•r
,,, R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 110-400-3302-4188 01552 $172.61
._... _777-7777- --- 00019 41005I
.. CITY HEALTH IN5/JUNE y2..._-----.7777-----06/04;9,_,� _._._............._...__ PARKING-ENF--------7EMPC0\'EE-BENEFITS_...-------7777-- -_$0:00-4670474/ 42•,1
v+ R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 145-400-3401-4188 01303 $4.34
00019 41005
CITY HEALTH INS7JUNE-92 06/04792 DIAL A RIDE -BENEFITS
,j
;• /EMPLOYEE $0.00 Ub7-04792;
,\
4
0
Jr
U
J'
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 14:55:00
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
1.1! PAY
• ,
R
R
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS
CITY HEALTH INS/JUN ff 92
SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS
CITY HE7.LTR-INSTJUNE-92
R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TPN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PAGE 0014
DATE 06/04/92
INV/REF PO * CHK 1-'
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
04398 145-400-3403-4188 00460 $0.33 . 00019 41005
06/04792 BUS PASS sussiv-7ewcovte7nENErtys $0.00 06/04/92
04398 145-400-3403-4188 00461 $0.65 00019 41005 .:
06/04/92. BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $006---66/04/92
04398
06/04792
145-400-3408-4188 00103 $0.33
COMMUTER-XPRESS7EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00019
$0-.00
41005
06/04/92 77
: 3
1,1
04398 155-400-2102-4188 00801 $4.70 00019 41005
06/04/92 CROSSING GUARD 7EMPL0YEE BENEFITS --- $0:00 06/04792;
04398 160-400-3102-4188 01268 $34.61
--CITY HEALTN INS7JUNE 92 06/04792- SEWER/51-DRAIN--7EMPEOYEE BENEFITS
•R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE, 92
04398 170-400-2103-4188 00276 $43.08
06/04/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY
!------------ ----HISC:CHARGES/ MAY 92
' !
I '
$1, 318. 83
23
00019 41005 ,
$0.00----(36104792
00019 41005
00114 001-400-2101-4306 01183 $135.24 00562 41006
05/31/92 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE ----------$0. 60------06/04/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $135.24
R THE*SOUND COMPANY,
.... COUNCIL SOUND SYS REPAIR -4309
-• •
*** VENDOR TOTAL
r
01398 001-400-4204-4309 02359 $135.00 4204-4309 04842 41007
04/21/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS-- ---$200:00-06/04/92
$135. 00
.1?
1.:
R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL
BLOOD ALCOHOL TESTING 773944
00107 001-400-2101-4201 01039 $150.75 8877394 04193 41008
04/28/92 POLICE- ---7CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00---06/04/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
$150. 75
R SOUTH BAY NOTICING AND
MISC. CHARGES / MAY 92
03882 001-400-4101-4201 00150 $460.00 '
05/31/92 PLANNING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT------
.
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
$460. 00
00564 41009
--30:00----06/04/92
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
ELECTRIC BILLINGS/MAY 92
00159 001-400-3101-4303 00210 $25.64
05/31/92 - MEDIANS ---7UTILITIES
00566 41010
$0.00-06/04/92
•
1:!
1.
2
or
FINANCE-SFA34O
TIME 14:55:00
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
PAGE
0015
r
- - --' - .. ._ Wilt 06/04/92
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNTUNENC DATE
EXP
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-3104-4303 00118 $267.82
00566 41010
ELECTRIC-BIELINGS7MAV 0573T792 --TRAFFIC-SAFETY
/UIILITIES $G:00`06.704/92
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00139 001-400-4204-4303 00569 $6,454.84 00566
-------ELECTRIC
.?
BILLINGS/MAY 92 05/31/92 BLDG-MAINT---7UTILITIES -- --- - 41010
$0.00-- 06/04/92`
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00439 $1,200.26
15
00566 41010
LLECTRTC-BILTINGS7MAY-"92 05/3I79d
PARKS /Ui 1EITIES $0.00-067047927;
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00364 $126.19
--
ELECTRIC BILLINGS/MAY-92 x5/31/92"- - -"- - 00566 41010 ;•',
STREET-LIGHTING7ITTILITIES
1.-i -$0: 00- -06704/9'
,' R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00197 $20.72
00566 4101023
ELECTRIC BILL-INGS7MAY-92 05/31792
SEWER7ST-DRAIN-7UTILTTIES $0.00 06704792.;
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $8,095.47 :17
10
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00568 $319.80 "
00567 41011
GAS-BILLINGS/MAY-1992 05731792 BLDG
FfAINT /UTILITIES- $0:00 06/04/92,
JA
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $319.80 15
31
38
R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 001-400-3103-4201 00405 $3,106.00 VI
bWEEP-SERVICEYMAY 1992 057317-- 00027 41012
-MAINTENANCE
92 ST /CUNTRACTSERVICE7PRIVAT $0. 00 06704792 ,,
R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 109-400-3301-4201 00123 $3,837.00 00027 1;
41012
SWEEP SERVICE/MAY-1992 05/31792 VEN PF(G-DIST-CONTRACT
SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00---06704/92
47 II
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $6,943.00
R SPORTMART 03479 001-400-4601-4308 00686 $71.49 ..,,
00569 41013
MISC. CHARGES«lAP 92 OS/31192 - -" COMM RESOURCES
7PROGRAM MATERIALS $0.00---06104/92-
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $71.49
;
R STANDARD FUSEE CORPORATION 02993 001-202-0000-2021 00220 $4.47 205M4222 04188 41014
--- ----DISCOUNT - DISCOUNT OFFERED _........t14222 ` -05/20192
DISCOUNTS -OFFERED - - $.G -
00"D6704/92',..
R STANDARD'FUSEE CORPORATION 02993 001-202-0000-2022 00216 $4.47CR
`•
205M4222 04188 41014
DISCOUNT T — AKENM4222 05/20792 /DISCOUNTS -TAKEN
$0.00--06704/92'
;;•
---- -
,y
•
•
.40
s
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 14:55:00
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
PAGE 0016
DATE 06/04/92
FAY VENDOR NAME VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 8 AMOUNT *INV/REF PO 0 CHK 0 2
3
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 4
H R STANDARD FUSEE CORPORATION 02993 001-400-2101-4309 00316 $442.40203M4222 04168 41014 n
FLARES / POLICE M4222 05/20/92 POLICE /RATNTENANCE MATERIALS —3459.46 0&704792 ;
:c
VENDOR_TOTAL ********************************************************************$442.40 ,
______________ _
LI , R T—Y NURSERY 04607 001-400-6101-4309 01256 $129.90 04617 41015
PLANTS-7—GREENBELT 05/04792 PARKS /MAINTENANCE—MATERIALS 4121.90 06704792
1.1.I
13
$129.90 0
-----
l'T R ROBERTA*TRAMBO 04669 001-210-0000-2110 04876 $100.00 04457 41016 ,
—DAMAGE—DEPOSIT—REFUND
I"I 06/01/92--- /DEPOSITS7WORK—GUARANTEE 40.00 06704792
.. !
1 ;
17
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $100.00 ,
_ .
: .
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 001-400-1212-4188 02406 $251.50 00029 41017
,
• :• t/TY—HEALTR—/NS/UUNE-92 06/04/9 EMP 13ENEFITS----7EMPEWEE BENEFITS 40:00-06704792 .
,.,
A
_ R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 145-400-3401-4188 01307 $1.14 00029 41017 ,
-CITY
...
1.1
HEALTH INS/JUNE 92 06/04/92 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 06/04/92,,
39
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 145-400-3402-4188 01293 $0.45 00029 41017 ,
I. C/TY—REACTR—URS7JUNE-92 06.704792 ESEA /EMPEOYEE—BENEFrTS 4000 06704792,.
1 s.1
i..] R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 160-400-3102-4188 01272 45.08 00029.:3
' 41017
1.' CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92 06/04/92 SEWER/ST—DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS — — --- — --$0:tiO — 06104./92-%
•
n)
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 705-400-1209-4188 00575 $5.08 00029 41017 m
3, CITY HEALTR—TNS7DUNE-92 06704/92 LIABILITY—INS---7ERFLOVEE7—BENEFITS G.7-uu---1.15157(Nu772.5
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $263.25 ,.,
•:,
•
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-202-0000-2021 00218 $71.13 00575 41018 ,
DISCOUNT -OFFERED 05731792 DISCOUNTS—OFFER D. $0700-----0.6704792 ':7
, R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-202-0000-2021 00219 $28.50 025483 04859 41018
.,c DISCOUNT OFFERED 25463 05/15/92 bISCOUNTS—OFFERED---------------40700---06704/92;.
'
6 3
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE ' 00123 001-202-0000-2022 00214 871.13CR 00575 41018
,
DISCOUNT TAKEN. 03/31/92 /DISCOUNTS—TAKEN 40.00 061047927
m
67
.•
)1
''. .
r 1
I ,
11!
•10
•••
ti
•
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 14: 55:00
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
1 11
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
VND #
DATE INVC
ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
DISCOUNT TAKEN 25484
TRIANGLE HARDWARE
'MISC_ CHARGES/MAY 1992
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
iKASH CANS7STREET-MAINT7-25483
00123 001-202-0000-2022
05/1579d
00123
05/31/92
00123
05/15792
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123
ISC. -CHARGES/MAY-1992--------------05/31/92
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
-MISC: CHARGES/MAY--1992
00215 $28.50CR
—7D I SCOUNTS WAKEN
001-400-3103-4309 01373 $4.85
PAGE 0017
DATE 06/04/92
INV/REF PO # CHK # 2 ,
AMOUNT UNENC. DATE EXP
025483 04859 41018
$0: 00--06 704 /92
00575 41018
ST MAINtENANCE-7MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 06/04/92
001-400-3103-4309 01374 $256.50 025483 04859 41018
ST MAINTENANCE 7MAINTENANCE-MATERIALS--`---"-$285.00 06704792 i;
001-400-3104-4309 00900 $56.68
TRAFFIC-SAFETY-7MAINTENANCE IATERIALS-
00123 ' 001-400-4204-4309 02356 $444.32
05/31792- --- -" BLDG MAINT-" /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS'
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-4205-4309 00647 $7.53
05/31/92 - EQUIP SERVICE- /MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS
- MISC. CHARGES/MAY 1992
***
R TRIANGLE HARDWARE
MISC-CHARGES7MAY 1992
00123 001-400-6101-4309 01255
05/31792 PARKS
$76. 81
IMAINTENANCE-MATERTALS
TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 105-400-2601-4309 00818 $49.96
-MISC. CHARGES/MAY-1?92 05/31/92-- ----- STREET --LIGHTING !MAINTENANCE -MATERIALS
VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$896. 65
00575 41018
.$0.00 ''''' -06/04/92'II
00575 41018
$O:00-06704/92.:.
00575 41018 C,„;
$0.00-
$0.00- 06/04/92:.;
00575 41018 ',
$0700 06104/92.{
00575 41018
$0. 00 —06/04/92
R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS.
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92
R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS.
CITY HEALTH-INSTJUNE-9d
UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS.
-CITY HEALTH-INS7JUNE 92
R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS.
LI-IN-HEALTH-INS/JUNE 92-
03790 001-400-1212-4188 02402
06/04792
$2,173.62
EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE -BENEFITS
03790 105-400-2601-4188 01291 $77.05
06704792— STREET -LIGHTING /LMPLUYLL DENEFIib
03790 109-400-3301-4188 00276 $9.00
06/04/92-`--._-.__"----VEH PKG-DIST /EMPLOYEE -BENEFITS
03790 110-400-3302-4188 01554 $385.23
06/04/92 PARKING-ENF /EMPED\LL UENLI-LCS
R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 145-400-3401-4188 01305
INS/JUNE-92-----
UNUM
JU E92UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS.
L ITY HEAi.TH INSTJUNE- 92
03790 145-400-3402-4188 01291
06/04-79d ESEA
$13. 29
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$1.66
/LMNLUYL . IJENu- 1 I S
00022 41019
$0.00-06704/92
00022 41019
S0700 ----06-704792t.:
00022 41019 I"
$0:00-06704/92H
00022 41019
$0700---06704/92k,
00022 41019 ,,.
$0.00 06/04792
00022 41019
30. uu 06/04792
4)
71
')
FIN. NCE-SFA340
TIME 14:55:00
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 06/04/92
PAGE 0018 -1.
DATE 06/04/92
Ir
'
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # z
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
5
7
R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 145-400-3403-4188 00462 *1.37 00022 41019 6
_._.
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92 06/04/92 BUS PASS-SIA3SITT7/MPUYEr BENEFITS $0.00 667b4/92 v
r,
R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 145-400-3408-4188 00105 *0.76 00022 41019
._—..--_.--.--CITY HEALTH--INS/JUNE 92-----.-..-_ -----06/04/92 ___...._...._._.....___...--.,COMMUTER XPREsG'%EMPI'_OYEE" BENEFITS $0.00---06/04/92;
R' UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 155-400-2102-4188 00803 *6.00 00022 41019
CITY -HEALTH INS7JUNE-92 06/04792 CROSSING -GUARD 7EHPEOYEE-BENEFTTS *07-00 0&7O479271
D
R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 160-400-3102-4188 01270 *60.60 00022 41019
„
_
CITY HEALTH INS/JUNE 92 06/04/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00_ 16%04/92`7
R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 705-400-1209-4188 00573 $18.61 00022 41019
CITY -HEALTH INSTJUI+JE 92 06/047'72 LIAB ICI-TV-1NS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 445700 06/04792
'_ _R UNUM_ LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 705-400-1217-4188 00637 $2.6.41 00022 41019 ,;
::
_
CITY HEALTH INS%JUNE 92 06/04/92 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0:0006704/92-
1., n
31
!., *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************u****•ofp•at+t*at*** taws•n** tit+lttatatat*****a******** $2,773.60
I
.
R WAXIE 03632 ' 02358 $1,126.72 11241254 04853 41020
_001-_4.00_-_420.4-4309
JANITOR SUPP/POLE WORKS 41254 05/15/92 BLDG MAINT MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ....- 311127.26 06/04/92,,
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,126.72 no
:3
_ WHITLOW EMERGENCY GRP 03457 001-400-2101-4201 01040 $70.00 04192 41021 :,
' --
----PRISONER
_ _ _
PRISONER EMERG. SERVICE 04/29/92 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT .. -$0.00 0b704/92•'
47
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *70.00 30
*** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** *146,410.32 .,;.
•,: *** TOTAL WARRANTS***********•w********************************•n*****-»***•*********** 3166,410.32
ig
1
+� 1 HEREBY C[RTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS
OR.0L 6 COVERED BY -------
y —
''' THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PA;GEES�
WARRANT REGISTER FOR'--1_---INCLUSIVE, OF THE ..
ARE ACCURATE,
FUNDS ARE�y�LgQy�
FOR-PAYn1Ci+tT-/
• AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE .5
TO THE BUDGET.
67
BY n
-FINANCE LMECTOR — ;
DATEIo S�/ /I} 70
n
Y.
,%
.J'
JS
)
4i
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
‘/9/9 --
June 4, 1992
City Council Meeting
of June 9, 1992
TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
June 18, 1992
2nd Budget Workshop meeting (if necessary)
June 23, 1992
Report on civilian enforcement
officers (GIP)
Public
Council 10/9/90 Map and time schedule for
street sweeping Public
Coordination of street sweeping
with trash pickup days
Proposed city ordinance on property
surveys within the City
CIP 85-137 - Valley Ardmore overlay
accept as complete
Public Hearings
Adoption of FY 92-93 budget
(if 2nd budget workshop not necessary)
Street lighting Maintenance
District 1992-93
Crossing Guard Maintenance
District 1992-93
June 30, 1992
Special meeting of City Council
Public Hearing/Budget Adoption
(If 2nd budget workshop necessary)
July 28, 1992
4th Quarter CIP status report
Quarterly update of Goals
Implementation Program
August 11, 1992
Safety Director
Wks. Department
Public Works Department
Public Works Department
Public Works Department
Public Works Department
Public Works Department
Public Works Director
City Manager
Hope Chapel Lease renewal
(Rms. 5, 6A)
September 8, 1992
Approval of Land Use Element (GIP)
Association for Retarded Citizens
lease renewal (Rm. 1, 2, 15)
South Bay Hospital District lease
renewal (Rm 9)
Easter Seals lease renewal
(Rms. 16, 17)
December, 1992
Project Touch lease renewal (Rm.C)
Community Resources Dir.
Planning Director
Community Resources Dir.
Community Resources Dir.
Community Resources Dir.
Community Resources Dir.
*****************************************************************
Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared
Caltrans utility maintenance agrmt.
Historic Preservation Ordinance
(with Land Use Element)
Public Works Director
Planning Director
*****************************************************************
Initiated by
Party Date
Council 5/8/90 Re. oil project CUP - define
"temporary" as relates to
height of project Planning Director
Goal 4
5/16/90 Options to computerize per-
sonnel as part of payroll
function Finance Director
Council 8/14/90 Review of standard CUP
conditions Planning Dir.
Ordinance for new Chapter 19
of HBMC entitled
"Motor Vehicles and
Traffic"
Public Works Dir.
City Mgr.2/21/91 RFP for computer system Data Processing
Council 3/12/91 South School Conceptual
design Community Resources
Council 6/6/91 Review Bldg/Zoning Code
changes to improve
liveability
Staff 7/25/91 Adjustment of Park Tax
Council 8/27 Revision of allowable
uses in open space zone
Council 9/24/91 Effect of nonconforming
ordinance on damaged
structures
Report on productivity incentives
for employees (GIP)
Participate w/school civics
program coordinator (GIP)
Statistical survey - requested
at 4/23/91 meeting
Report on cost effectiveness of
downtown enforcement (GIP) Police/Finance
Planning Director
Building Director
Planning
Planning Dept.
Personnel Director
Personnel Director
3
Honorable Mayor
and Members of the
City Council
June 2, 1992
City Council Meeting
of June 9, 1992
MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE
PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH
Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the
month of May 1992.
Respectfully submitted,
Gary Bruysch
City Treasurer
NOTED:
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager
id
INSTITUTION
TOTAL
INVESTMENT REPORT - MAY 1992
DATE OF DATE OF
INVESTMENT MATURITY
ASKING
PRICE
MARKET
VALUE INTEREST
LAIF
BALANCE 5/1/92
Maturity
Investment
Maturity
Investment
Investment
BALANCE 5/31/92
LACPIF
Railroad
BALANCE
BALANCE
$9,398,756.00
<450,000.00>
300,000.00 5/07/92
<500,000.00>
600,000.00 5/21/92
400,000.00 5/27/92
$9,748,756.00
Right -of -Way Account
5/01/92
5/31/92
$ 1,040,074.56
MERRILL LYNCH
CORPORATE NOTES:
Ford Motor Credit Co.
Investment
U.S. TREASURY BOND:
Investment
1,040,074.56
$ 500,000.00
5/05/92
5/18/92
5.692%
5.40%
5/19/88 5/20/93 $ 500,000.00 $ 519,450 9.10%
$ 996,875.00 5/14/90 2/15/93 $ 996,875.00 $1,025,440 8.49%
Investment $1,005,937.50 9/14/90 6/30/94 $1,005,937.50 $1,062,810 8.50%
INVESTMENT TOTAL $13,291,643.06
SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST
BALANCE 4/1/92 $ 525,778.25
Adjustment 72.92
BALANCE 4/30/92
TICOR TITLE INSURANCE CO.
BALANCE 12/31/91
BALANCE 12/31/91
TRUSTEE TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
525,851.17 8.625%
$ 11,717.01
11,717.01
$ 537,568.18
$13,829,211.24
Respectfully Submitted,
Gary Brutsc
City Treas rer
7.5%
-55y�
‘/Y/9.
May 19, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach City Council June 9, 1992
SUBJECT: LOS ANGELES COUNTY INTERIM PARATRANSIT PLAN
FOR THE DISABLED
INITIATED BY STAFF
PURPOSE: Compliance with Americans With Disabilities Act
of 1990 (ADA)
Recommendation
Adoption of the attached resolution.
Background
The City Council adopted Resolution 91-5509, at the December 10,
1991 City Council meeting, agreeing to participate in the
development of the L.A. County Consolidated ADA paratransit plan.
Analysis
Federal regulations implementing the ADA require that cities
andfixed route operators participating in a coordinated plan must
adopt a final plan and submit it to DOT by July 26, 1992.
The Los Angeles County Transportation Commission is requesting
�,... the City's support of the final Plan. By passing the attached
• resolution, the City reaffirms its authorization of the LACTC to
assume its obligations to provide the complementary paratransit
service and submit the final plan as required by the ADA. In
addition, adoption of this resolution indicates the City
Council's support of the proposed program, its design and
concepts, funding and other programming and planning issues.
Failure to pass a support resolution will require the City to
immediately begin providing complementary paratransit service, as
required by the ADA, and to prepare and submit a Complementary
Paratransit Plan.
To participate in the Los Angeles County Coordinated
Complementary Paratransit Plan, the City must pass a resolution
by June 15, 1992 certifying its support of the proposed program.
le
The executive summary has been attached, and a complete copy of
the plan is on file in the City Clerk's office, and in the
Planning Department.
CONCUR:
xA4.63c:�.,e.,,,,,a,-�
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager
-1 -7 2, / -. , %-
Michael Schubach
Planning Director
p/ccsrada
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY COORDINATED
PARATRANSIT PLAN.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach,
California held a meeting on June 9, 1992 and made the following
findings:
A. The Americans With Disabilities Act (hereinafter referred to
as "ADA") was enacted on July 26, 1990 (Public Law 101-336);
B. On September 6, 1991 the United States Department of
Transportation (hereinafter referred to as "DOT") issued a
final rule implementing the transportation -related provisions
of the ADA (49 CFR Parts 27, 37 and 38, Transportation for
Individuals With Disabilities);
C. Subpart F, Sections 37.121 and 37.135 of 49 CFR 37 requires
that each fixed route transit operator provide complementary
paratransit service to disabled individuals, prepare a plan
for implementation of such service and begin service
implementation by January 26, 1992;
D. Subpart F, Section 37.141 of 49 CFR 37 allows the preparation.:
and submittal of a single coordinated paratransit plan among
the operators of fixed route transit service with overlapping
and contiguous service areas;
E. The City of Hermosa Beach (hereinafter referred to as "City")
operates a fixed route transit system in Los Angeles County
and is required to provide ADA -eligible complementary
paratransit service and prepare and submit an annual
paratransit plan to DOT;
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
F. The Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (hereinafter
referred to as "LACTC") , which is mandated by state statutes
to coordinate paratransit services in Los Angeles County, has
initiated the development of a countywide coordinated
paratransit network (hereinafter referred to as "Network") as
the most appropriate and effective means of meeting the ADA
obligations of the Los Angeles County fixed route transit
operators;
G. The City adopted a resolution on December 10, 1991,
authorizing its participation in the development of the Plan;
and
H. On behalf of the Los Angeles County's fixed route operators,
the LACTC prepared an interim plan for the provision of the
ADA paratransit service, which included support resolutions
from fixed route operators and cities which operate or
participate in fixed route transit systems and submitted said
interim plan to DOT on January 27, 1992; and
'I. The LACTC has agree to prepare the DOT -required first-year
coordinated paratransit plan (hereinafter referred to as the
"Plan") to be submitted to DOT on July 26, 1992 for all
participating Los Angeles County fixed route transit
operators which pass resolutions adopting the Plan;
J. The City has participated in the development of the Plan and
has provided fiscal and operating data about its current
fixed route and paratransit systems to the LACTC in a timely
manner;
K. The City agrees to maintain current levels of paratransit
service until the coordinated plan is fully implemented, in
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
accordance with 49 CFR 37.141; and
L. The LACTC will provide funding and coordinate the operations
of paratransit services, above the level of elderly and
disabled transit services being provided by the City, which
may be required by the Plan;
M. The City desires to fulfill its ADA -mandated paratransit
obligations through participation in the coordinated
paratransit through participation in the Plan and Network as
developed by the LACTC.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE THE FOLLOWING:
Section 1. The City of Hermosa Beach is committed to meeting its
ADA -mandated paratransit obligations by supporting
and participating in the Los Angeles County
Coordinated Paratransit Plan to be submitted to DOT
on July 26, 1992.
Section 2. The City of Hermosa Beach does hereby adopt the Los
Angeles County Coordinated Complementary Paratransit
Plan.
Section 3. In accordance with 49 CFR Part 37.141, the City does
hereby agree to maintain current levels of
paratransit service until the coordinated plan is
fully implemented.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the. passage and
adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the same to
be entered among the original resolutions of said
City; and shall make a minute of the passage and
adoption thereof in the records of the proceeding of
the City Council of said City in the minutes of the
meeting at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this
day of , 1992.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
APPRD S TO FO
CITY CLERK C'T ATTORNEY
p/ccrsada
B4CHGROUND
NI/TER/4
LosAngeles County Coordinated Paratransit. Plan
Executive
Summary
W 1
METRO
Los Angeles
County
Transportation
Commission
• ...
..
iii::€Bakifine::eE;
.1a=0,4,0=EILIE1-40=0=azellew-E-t t =emfa=m=Eime=s=6.1
,==eirano.uf.D.::enorzsIlezro=on,
r... -40=0=0:10=0: -.0=6=M=0=0:7.0 -L "Ei=omo=e=mr-e=erze
==tal=o=o=m=o=or.orallm=m=ouor.t==o=o=enazur.e=ollor:
11-74.1mer.or.o=rii=agorzei=oue=azoLloi.:o=e=mr.sttor.sme,grA
(.n.=E-1=EI,0=-:1=F1=0„-.10=mr.fflmotIF:11=1-4e=0:: = =i -1113m
Fau ts r13
n n nAnnE
n n.n 24.n =On n at:Jr: ng gn
cOlgetA5113tANTER
n n ng gn n ngng nugngn n
isseltteln n nCltnerenwitenCiVnt3n nrigen nrEmzenonlanatnCit
tun :swan nagf3Atsps nal: n n5slag nt3pninusinianontEne
.402001166a0MILONgtRawaRIEffalg
p,c3:0:313:43:41,3:0:0,43tcluaimagis,w,c3m20:51,:upta,pulnot:t
,::(3:43:43:43n(3811:003::(3:43natniatentunC3nOnt3n(3ronOnCP:C3nD
c3::(3:43:43:43:43::C3n0:13:43::C3nruttpnCinelnC3n(3::13:43nenC3nC3nC
.1:0::0::C3:03::CInC3::CI::E3nOnMCIPC3,7C3-7MgMnetnMnintnentel M
01808921:1710121011031101127:13:1312181:01-648,1
tS1628138,989898969g8i2nt3nOnC3nC3ntuntsnwutzrz:w;:uinwnw;
,::M:anC3nC3:43::C)::CI::C3::8::e8W812,.8989.89.*.lattlatt"9:*:8C3ng
",128%1
:•_,-;:“•t: J2,113:: .1 Si_ '
gwatRgefeent2g.38126;38g g i'*3:TE34: t
3::113:4E3::ra:: • • r " "
"- • :i::••1;;;:k:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
COORDINATED PARATRANSIT PLAN
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Background
The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), passed by Congress in
1990, guarantees equal opportunity for individuals with
disabilities in employment, public accommodations, transportation,
state and local government services, and telecommunications.
The transportation provisions of the ADA focus on making public
transit fully accessible to persons with disabilities and require
that public transit operators provide complementary paratransit
service to individuals who are unable to use accessible fixed -route
bus or rail systems. This plan focuses on the provision of
complementary paratransit service in Los Angeles County.
The ADA requires each public fixed -route bus operator, such as the
Southern California Rapid Transit District, to provide paratransit
(dial -a -ride) service to individuals with disabilities that is
comparable to the level of service provided to individuals without
disabilities who use the regular, fixed -route bus system. The
paratransit service is intended to "complement" the regular bus
system and is limited to serve strictly defined categories of
individuals with disabilities.
Complementary paratransit is an alternative form of transportation
for those individuals who cannot use the regular, fixed -route bus
system, but is not intended to provide a comprehensive system of
transportation for all individuals with disabilities.
Plan Concepts and Design
On behalf of the 37 Los Angeles County fixed -route transit
operators, the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (LACTC)
has proposed the development of a coordinated countywide
paratransit network to provide the ADA -required paratransit
service. Called METRO ACCESS, this coordinated network will
eliminate duplicative and overlapping service that would result if
each fixed -route operator provided the ADA -mandated complementary
paratransit service on its own. Additionally, a coordinated
network will provide increased mobility for ADA -eligible persons
because service will be provided within most of the urbanized
portions of Los Angeles County and will not be limited to each
fixed -route operator's service area.
1
The proposed network will be comprised, of both public and non-
profit paratransit operators that will "sell" excess service during
off peak times at negotiated rates. The network will also contract
with private operators for services. By negotiating with operators
to provide METRO ACCESS service at a competitive price, the network
will promote the efficient use of existing resources and reduce the
overall program cost.
Another concept which will make efficient use of existing resources
is the utilization of existing public, city -run paratransit systems
to continue to provide local service. Approximately 79 of the 88
cities in Los Angeles County and the County of Los Angeles provide
local paratransit service which is currently meeting much of the
transportation needs of the ADA -eligible population. Individuals
with disabilities are strongly encouraged to continue to use their
local paratransit service whenever possible.
The Plan calls for a "broker" to manage METRO ACCESS. The broker
will be responsible for receiving calls for trips, determining
which provider has the capacity to provide the trip, and
dispatching the trip request to the provider. The brokerage system
is currently operating successfully in the first stage of the --
countywide project in the east San Gabriel Valley.
Funding for the development of the Los Angeles County Coordinated
Paratransit Plan and implementing the METRO ACCESS service is
appropriated from the Proposition A and Proposition C Discretionary
Accounts.
Description of the METRO ACCESS Service
METRO ACCESS service is designed to meet the letter and intent of
the ADA, which uses the fixed -route service as a basis for
determining the service area, days and hours of operation and fare
structure of the ADA paratransit service.
METRO ACCESS is a curb -to -curb transportation service provided in
areas within 3/4 mile on either side of the fixed route. Because
there are over 600 fixed -route bus lines in Los Angeles County, the
METRO ACCESS service area will eventually include most of the
urbanized area of the county. METRO ACCESS operates 24 hours a day
in the service area illustrated in Attachment A, but service hours
for a particular trip depend upon the corresponding fixed -route
service. The cost of a trip on METRO ACCESS is determined on an
individual basis, based on twice the undiscounted fare of a similar
trip on the fixed -route system. Eligible individuals will be told
the fare when they schedule a trip on METRO ACCESS.
The ADA regulations encourage the use of "real time" scheduling,
which provides service to individuals when they request it,
eliminating the need for advanced reservations. "Real time"
scheduling more closely mirrors a person's experiences using the
2
regular bus service in which advanced reservations are not
possible. Using this system, METRO ACCESS requires trips to be
scheduled within two hours of the requested pick-up time.
Individuals may request trips up to 14 days in advance; however,
they must call within two hours of pick-up to confirm their trip.
Eligible individuals may ride as often as they wish with no
priorities given to certain types of trips, such as medical visits.
Personal care attendants may ride free of charge with the eligible
individual. One companion may ride with the eligible individual at
the METRO ACCESS fare, and up to four companions are allowed as
long as they do not displace other eligible passengers.
Estimated Demand for METRO ACCESS Service
Using methodology recommended in the ADA guidelines, the LACTC has
estimated that the total population eligible for METRO ACCESS
service within Los Angeles County is approximately 90,000
individuals. The LACTC is estimating that, once phased -in
countywide, METRO ACCESS and the local paratransit systems will
provide 16,000 trips per day.
Certification Process
The ADA quite clearly intends that complementary paratransit
service be provided for those individuals whose disability prevents
them from using the regular bus system. The proposed certification
process, which was developed in conjunction with a panel of medical
and social service disability experts, is designed to clearly
identify eligible individuals without greatly inconveniencing the
applicant.
The proposed certification process requires every applicant to be
interviewed in person by a screener, who is a medical or social
service professional with experience working with persons with
disabilities. The interview, which is initiated by theapplicant
once he or she has completed the METRO ACCESS application form, is
conducted at convenient certification centers located within the
service area, or at a prearranged site, such as a social service
agency or convalescent home. Transportation to and from the
certification site will be provided to the client free of charge.
The screener will conduct a 15 -minute, one-on-one evaluation, not
a medical examination, asking the applicant a series of questions
to determine whether the individual is capable of using the regular
bus system.
At the end of the evaluation, the screener will make a
determination whether the person is eligible. The eligible
applicant will receive a photo ADA card and a description of any
restrictions on his or her eligibility. If the screener denies the
application, the applicant may appeal the decision to a
3
certification professional with expertise in the individual's
particular disability, or disabilities. This professional will
make the final determination of eligibility.
There are three types of eligibility for service: unrestricted,
temporary, and restricted. Individuals certified as unrestricted
are eligible for any trip on the METRO ACCESS service. Temporary
eligibility may be assigned to individuals who have temporary
disabilities or are visiting the area. Restricted eligibility is
given to individuals whose disabilities may fluctuate or are
transient in nature, or who may be able to make certain trips on
the regular bus system but not others.
Timetable for Countywide Implementation
The ADA regulations allow up to five years to phase-in the
complementary paratransit service. As shown in Attachment B, the
Los Angeles County Coordinated Paratransit Plan proposes to phase-
in METRO ACCESS across the county as follows:
Area 1 - San Gabriel Valley - METRO ACCESS is currently operating
in the east San Gabriel Valley, which is comprised of 15 cities.
from the 605 freeway extending east to the county line. The Plan
proposes the phase-in of the western portion of the San Gabriel
Valley, including the cities of Pasadena, South Pasadena, Alhambra
and Monterey Park on the western edge, by September, 1992.
Area 2 - West/Central Los Angeles - Area 2 encompasses the central
portion of Los Angeles and extends west to the Pacific Ocean.
Slauson represents the southern boundary, and Mulholland Drive the
northern boundary of this area. Area 2 is proposed to receive
METRO ACCESS service beginning January 1993 with full
implementation by January 1994.
Area 3 - Southeast - Area 3 is divided into two sections. Area 3a,
which includes Montebello, Commerce and Vernon to the north and
Lynwood, Downey and Santa Fe Springs to the south, is scheduled to
receive service beginning January 1994. The entire southeast area,
which extends south and includes Long Beach, Compton, Norwalk and
La Mirada, will be fully implemented by January, 1995.
Area 4 - South Bay - Area 4 covers the area from Slauson Boulevard
to San Pedro and the Pacific Ocean to Long Beach in the east. This
area is scheduled for phase-in beginning January, 1995.
Area 5 - San Fernando Valley/North County - Area 5 is divided into
three section. Area 5a, the San Fernando Valley, will receive
service beginning January, 1996. METRO ACCESS service will be
provided to Areas 5b and 5c, which consist of the Santa Clarita
Valley and the Antelope Valley areas, beginning June, 1996.
4
9
Responsibilities of Transit Operators
Each of the 53 cities which operate or participate in a fixed -route
bus system as well as the Southern California Rapid Transit
District (SCRTD), Foothill Transit, and the County of Los Angeles,
are required to formally adopt the Los Angeles County Coordinated
Paratransit Plan. These 56 entities must pass resolutions adopting
the Plan by June 15, 1992 to be included in the Plan which will be
submitted to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) on July
26, 1992. Cities and agencies which fail to adopt the Plan are
required to immediately prepare and submit their own plans for the
provision of complementary paratransit service and begin that
service immediately.
The participating cities and agencies are currently reviewing the
Plan and are considering resolutions for its adoption. In
addition, cities which provide only paratransit or dial -a -ride
service (and no fixed -route service) are considering resolutions
adopting the Plan to support the development of a countywide
network to serve the disabled.
Public Outreach and Participation
The LACTC has made a tremendous effort to hear from persons with
disabilities on the development of the Los Angeles County
Coordinated Paratransit Plan. Five public workshops were held in
October, 1991 and four in April, 1992, to brief the community on
the ADA requirements and the concepts and design of the Plan. In
addition, one public hearing was held in January, and four public
hearings are scheduled for early May, 1992, at various locations in
Los Angeles County, to formally receive public comment on the Plan.
A public outreach campaign also was begun in the east San Gabriel
Valley to inform potential clients about the METRO ACCESS service.
Brochures, letters, presentations, newspaper advertisements and a
press event were designed to promote the use of METRO ACCESS to
potentially eligible persons. The public information and outreach
campaign is ongoing and will be expanded as the service is phased
in across the county.
All public information, including copies of the Plan, brochures,
and fact sheets are available in alternative formats upon request,
including Braille, large print and audio tape. Sign language
interpreters and assistive listening devices are available upon
request for use by persons with hearing impairments at the public
hearings or other public meeting.
The Los Angeles County Transportation Commission encourages all
interested individuals to review the Los Angeles County Coordinated
Paratransit Plan and to participate in its development. For more
information about the Plan or METRO ACCESS, please call Deidre
Heitman, Program Manager, at (213) 244-6744, TDD (213) 244-6908.
5
•
ATTACHMENT A
Fixed Route Transit Service Area
ANGE.ES:NATIONAL'FOCEST ::
"1/4*.‘„,,.:•••;,,Ns.....,....„,s,t.10/4.4...,,:\N\r‘... •
MOM
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Proposed Metro Access Phase -1n Boundaries
May 27, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council June 9, 1992
PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY CURB. PARKING PROHIBITION
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council receive and file the attached
letter from Caltrans. The letter provides information for
Council relative to Caltrans' time frame for providing the City
with a nine month status report on the Pacific Coast Highway curb
parking prohibition.
Background:
The Hermosa Beach City Council agreed to remove curb parking on
portions of southbound Pacific Coast Highway in May 1991.
(Project was implemented June 3, 1991). Caltrans agreed to
provide Hermosa Beach with an interim report after nine months of
operation and after one year of operation.
Analysis:
It appears that by the time Caltrans receives their data and
provides the City with a report it will be approximately one year
from implementation. At that time City staff and Caltrans will
technically evaluate the conditions and report to City Council
with recommendations to retain status quo or return curb parking.
Attachment: Letter from Caltrans dated May 13, 1992.
Respe )ully su ► itted, Concur:
� 1
J
Ed Ruzak J
City Traff c'Engn-er
pworks/CCPCHPRK
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager and Acting
Director of Public Works
if
STATE OF CALIFORNIA -BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
PETE WILSON, GON•vtor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 7, 120 50. SPRING ST.
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
TDD (213) 620-3550
(213) 897-0279
May 13, 1992
Mr. Edward Ruzak
City Traffic Engineer
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885
RECEIVED
MAY 2 0 1992
PUBLIC WORKS _DEPT.
7 -LA -1 20.621/22.201
Pacific Coast Highway -
Sepulveda Blvd. in the
City of Hermosa Beach
Dear Mr. Ruzak:
YOUR APRIL 20, 1992 LETTER TO MR. BAXTER REGARDING
EVALUATION OF THE SOUTHBOUND ROUTE 1 WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK
PERIOD PARKING PROHIBITION
Mr. Jerry Baxter has requsted that I respond to your letter.
As stated in Mr. Baxter's September 19, 1991 letter Caltrans
will provide a 9 month status report. This status report will
consist of a tabulation of available traffic and accident data, a
letter summarizing our observations concerning the data, and the
operation of the facility.
The improvement was implemented on June 3, 1991. By
February 3, 1992, the improvement has been in operation for
9 months. Complete accident data will not be available for
print-out until the end of May, due to the lead time requirements
for transmitting & tabulating data in Sacramento. Traffic
counts will be made at key intersections during the month of
May. Accident print-outs will be ordered in June. The city
should receive our status report by late June/early July.
To date, Caltrans does not require anything from the City
Council.
Mr. Edward Ruzak
May 13, 1992
Page Two
If you require any additional information regarding
this matter, please contact Mr. Karl F. Berger of my staff at
(213) 897-0312.
Sincerely,
LARRY P. LOUDON, Chief
Traffic Operations Branch
410
May 19, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council June 9, 1992
CORRECTION OF EXISTING TELEPHONE EASEMENT AT
SOUTH SCHOOL PROPERTY
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to
sign a Grant of Easement to GTE for an existing telephone pole
line.
Background:
When the survey was done for the South School Site, it was found
that the legal description for the existing telephone line
located at the west edge of the City's property was in error.
The telephone company has prepared a correcting document and has
submitted the proper legal description to the City.
Analysis:
The error occurred in the deed that was executed between GTE and
the School District and should be corrected. Authorizing the
Mayor to sign the attached Grant of Easement will provide that
correction. In exchange, the telephone company will provide a
quit claim of the existing easement to the City, thus, removing
the incorrect easement (a copy is attached). The telephone
company has also provided a drawing showing the correct location
of the pole line.
Respectfully submitted, Concur:
476r2
Lynn A. Terry P.E.
Deputy City Engineer
pworks/phonss
- 1 -
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager and Acting
Director of Public Works
ig
GTE Telephone Operations
West Area
22715 Hawthorne Boulevard
P.O. Box 1277
Torrance, CA 90505
310/791-4236
Reply To
CAYO3NC
R/W 3454
City of Hermosa Beach
Attn: Lynn Terry
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach. CA 90504
Reference Grant of Easement/Quitclaim of Easement
South School Site
Dear Mr. Terry:
In follow up to our telephone conversation of January 15, 1992, enclosed
are two copies of the corrected easement for the telephone facilities
located on the referenced site as well as a copy of the Quitclaim Deed
which. when properly executed by GTE. will release all rights GTE has at
the incorrect location.
It will take approximately 45 days for GTE to process the quitclaim. We
propose to arranae to have the Ouitclaim and new Grant of Easement
document recorded in succession with the quitclaim first and then the new
easement.
I apologize for any inconvenience or problems that this mistake on our
part may have caused the City of Hermosa Beach and appreciate your help
and cooperation in correcting this matter to the satisfaction of both the
City and GTE.
Should you have any questions or if you need any additional information,
please call me at 310/791-4236.
Very truly yours,
Betty U. Lang V
Engineer OSP - Right of Way
Enclosures
GTE Alaska Incorporated
GTE California Incorporated
GTE Hawaiian Telephone Company Incorporated
GTE Northwest Incorporated
A part of GTE Ccrporation
'RECORDING REQUESTED BY
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
When Recorded Mail to
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
P.O. Box 1277
Torrance, CA 90505
Attention: B.D. LANG
0 py
No Consideration And Value Less Than $100.00
No Documentary Transfer Tax Due
By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED R/W Agent
QUITCLAIM OF EASEMENT
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED. a corporation. formerly incorporated as General Telephone
Company of California, hereby quitclaims to the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, all its right, title,
and interest in and to the easement and right of way for telephone purposes in the real
property situated in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California,
described as follows:
The Northerly 3 feet of the Easterly 13 feet of the Southerly 164 feet of Block "P" of Tract
No. 2002. in the City of Hermosa Beach. County of Los Angeles. State of California, as per
map recorded in Book 22, Page 154 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said
County.
Also, the Southerly 3 feet of the vacated alley as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
by reference made a part here of.
Said easement was acquired by GTE California Incorporated by Document No. 87-1130515,
recorded July 16, 1987. Official Records of County of Los Angeles.
The easement quitclaimed hereby is not necessary or useful in the performance of the duties
of GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED to the public.
EXECUTED at Thousand Oaks, California, this day of , 19
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
a corporation
By and
President Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF )ss.
On , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said
State. personally appeared
personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the
person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me
that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their sionature(s) on the instrument the person(s). or the entity upon behalf of
which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
When Recorded Mail to
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
P.O. Box 1277
Torrance, CA 90505
Attention: B.D. LANG
No Consideration And Value
Less Than $100.00
No Documentary Transfer Tax Due
By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED R/W Agent
GRANT OF EASEMENT
THE GRANTOR, THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, hereby grants to GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED, a
corporation, hereinafter referred to as GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, an easement to
construct, use, maintain, operate, alter, add to, repair, replace, and/or remove its
telephone facilities including cables, poles, wires, underground conduits, manholes,
pedestals and appurtenances, for the transmission of electric energy for communication and
other purposes on, over, in, under, across, and along that certain real property situated in
the City of Hermosa Beach, the County of Los Angeles, State of California, described as
follows:
A strip of land 3 feet in width located within Block "P" of Tract No. 2002, in the City of
Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 22,
Page 154 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County and within that portion
of the vacated alley located adjacent to and Westerly of said Block "P".
The Southerly line of said strip is described as follows:
Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 23, Block "K", Tract No. 1686, as per map recorded
in Book 20, Page 188, of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County;
thence Easterly along the Easterly prolongation of the Northerly line of said Lot 23 a
distance of 23 feet.
This legal description was prepared pursuant to Section 8730(C) of the Business and
Professions Code.
GRANTEE, its successors and assigns and their respective agents and employees, shall have the
right of ingress to and egress from said easement and every part thereof, at all times, for
the purpose of exercising the rights herein granted and shall have the right to remove such
growth as may endanger or interfere with the use of said easement. Such rights shall be
reasonably exercised and the Grantee shall be liable for any damage negligently done by it to
the above described property.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Grantor has executed this instrument this day
of , 19
GRANTOR:
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
BY: BY:
TITLE: TITLE:
`o
30'
ISO
35'
//02'
35'
C‘j
CUL.PEE T
V.
CT.
GENERAL TELEPHONE OF CALIFORNIA
LOCATION
EXCHANGE
C.O.
ISSUE DATE
APPROVALS
DWG SIZE
B
AREA GENERAL MANAGER
DWG. NO. RELATED DWGS.
EXH/'/T.Ci
WORK ORDER
1'1x,) 33o 8
FORM 6095N
.2-5syy
June 1, 1992
Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach City Council June 9, 1992
SUBJECT: REDUCED FEE FOR WALLS AND FENCES REQUIRING A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PURPOSE: TO ESTABLISH A NEW FEE FOR EXCEPTIONS TO WALL AND
FENCE HEIGHTS
INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
To adopt the attached resolution to amend Resolution 90-5422.
Background
At the meeting of April 28, 1992, the City Council initiated an
amendment to the master fee resolution to allow a reduced fee for
walls and fences at a suggested rate of $519.75 ($200 fee plus
319.75 noticing fee).
Analysis
Section 1215(6) of the zoning ordinance provides for exceptions
to the height limits for walls and fences where residential and
non-residential property abut. This section was, added in July of
1990 as a way to mitigate various types of impacts that are
caused by the conflict between commercial and residential uses.
The mechanism for obtaining an exception under this section is a
Conditional Use Permit.
The current fees established for conditional use permits of
$627.50 originated from the the citywide user fee study conducted
in 1990, and was based on more typical C.U.P.'s for commercial
establishments. Processing exceptions to wall and fence height,
although not a simple task, takes less staff time to prepare, and
less time to discuss at public meetings than processing a more
typical commercial C.U.P. As such, staff believes a standard
lower fee for wall and fence C.U.P's is warranted.
Michael Schubach'
Place ring Director
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager
Attachments
1. Proposed Resolution
2. City Council Minutes 4/28/92
—i
Res ctfully subm}tted,
( RobeY tson
Associate Planner
NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT:
Vicki opeland
Finance Director
lb
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 90-5422 TO ESTABLISH AN
ADDITIONAL FEE CATEGORY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR WALLS AND
FENCES
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting to consider a
lower fee for conditional use permits for walls and fence height
exceptions applied for pursuant to Section 1215(6) of the zoning
ordinance and made the following findings:
A. The fee category "conditional use permit commercial" was
based on an evaluation of the costs associated with the
preparation and processing time of typical commercial
conditional use permits;
B. The cost to process a conditionaluse permit which only
involves an exception to wall and fence heights is
substantially less than that required for a typical
commercial conditional use permits;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Hermosa Beach does hereby amend the City's Master Fee
Resolution No. 90-5422, as follows:
1. Amend Schedule 3 - Planning to add a new fee category and to
read as follows:
"CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT,
FENCES AND WALLS"
Legal
Authority
HBMC 29.5-12
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this
1992
Fee
$200
day of
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNE
2
p/ccrsfe
(j)
Recommendation to initiate amendment to Resolution 90-
5422 to allow a reduced fee for fences requiring condi-
tional use permits in response to letter regarding
waiver of fees. Memorandum from Planning Director
Michael Schubach dated April 8, 1992. Supplemental
memorandum from Patricia Stoops, Assistant Planner, dat-
ed April 28, 1992.
Planning director Schubach responded to Council
questions.
Coming forward to address the Council on this item were:
Greg Klezek - 744 Longfellow Avenue, stated that
building a fence to screen his yard from com-
mercial activity at Vasak Polak will cost over
$2,000 in City fees and requested the Council
waive the fees; and,
Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., commented that
the fence could not be included at the Planning
Commission meeting since it had not been
noticed.
City Council Minutes 04-28-92 Page 7780
-3-
i
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to initiate
an amendment to Resolution 90-5422 to allow a reduced
fee for walls and fences requiring Conditional Use Per-
mits at a suggested rate of $519.75 ($200 Fee plus
$319.75 Noticing Fee).
Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered. (Note: the
above Action was made, withdrawn, and reinstated but is
shown once for clarity.)
City Council Minutes 04-28-92 Page 7781
- t.f—
dr
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -
MEMORANDUM
# - -
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of
the Hermosa Beach City Council
FROM: Patricia Stoops, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: Attached letter regarding waiver of CUP fees for an
over -height wall.
DATE: April 8, 1992
In the attached letter, Mr. Klezek refers to a CUP requirement set
forth in Section 1215(6) of the Zoning Ordinance. The current fee
for such a request is $947.25 (CUP: $627.50 + noticing: $319.75).
On March 17th, the Planning Commission approved a request,
pertaining to the above section, for the construction of an
over -height wall on two residential properties adjacent to Vasek
Polak's BMW Dealership. The item was heard in conjunction with Vasek
Polak's Amendment request regarding triple car stackers.
The two residents combined their requests into a single CUP
application and filed it in time to be scheduled for the same meeting
as Vasek Polak. Staff was then able to address these similar issues
in one report, thus reducing staff time, and also reducing consultant
costs in that all of the above items could be noticed in a single
mailing, and heard as a single agenda item. Unfortunately, Mr.
Klezek did not submit an application and therefore his address was
not included on the notices and could not legally be included in the
public hearing.
Staff would concur with a reduction in the fee for Conditional Use
Permits pertaining to over -height walls in general, as they require
less staff time than typical CUP's.
Recommendation
Direct Staff to initiate an amendment to Resolution 90-5422 to allow
a reduced fee for fences requiring Conditional Use Permits.
Suggested Fee: $519.75 ($200.00 CUP Fee + $319.75 Noticing Fee)
CONC R:
�/ . ��
Michael Schubach, P1�nning Direc r
Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager
NOTED/�FOR FISCAL IMPACT:
(2 t,41-
Viki Copland, Finance Director
9,2-SSyS
June 1, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council June 9, 1992
SUBJECT: DIAL -A -RIDE TRANSIT SERVICE
PURPOSE: TO APPROVE PARTICIPATION IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (LACTC) SUBREGIONAL
INCENTIVE MOBILITY PROGRAM
Recommendation
Approve participation in the program by adopting the attached
resolution.
Background/Analysis
The Cities of Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach have been operating
a joint venture dial -a -ride service ("The Wave") since 1987, and -
have executed an agreement to continue this service until 1993.
Official participation in the LACTC's Subregional Incentive
Mobility Program is necessary to obtain special funding to help
support the cities' dial -a -ride budgets.
CONCUR: , '
4-
Michael Schubach
Planning Director
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager
Attachment:
1. Proposed resolution.
1
Respectfully submitted,
en Robertson
Associate Planner
p/ccsrwave
1i
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
APPROVING THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SUBREGIONAL INCENTIVE MOBILITY PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting to consider
approval of participation in the Subregional Incentive Mobility
Program and made the following Findings:
A. The Cities of Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach jointly operate
the Hermosa/Redondo Dial -A -Ride, a demand -response service
for the general public, elderly and disabled citizens; and
B. The Cities of Redondo Beach and Hermosa Beach have been
operating this joint venture dial -a -ride since February 2,
1987, and have executed an agreement to continue service
until FY 93; and
C. Fare revenues and local support, as required under the Los
Angeles Transportation Commission's Transit Performance
Measurement program, must amount to a minimum of 33 1/3
percent of the proposed program's total operating cost; and
D. The City of Hermosa Beach is applying for funds under the
Subregional Incentive Mobility Program not to exceed 25% of
the non -formula funds in its FY 1992-93 proposed
Hermosa/Redondo Dial -A -Ride operating budget in conformance
with the guidelines of the Los Angeles County Transportation
Commission; and
E. The responsibility for any resulting shortfalls in fare
revenues, local contributions, or program revenues will be
shared proportionately by both cities;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows:
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1. The City supports the filing of an application with the Los
Angeles County Transportation Commission for FY 1992-93
Proposition A Discretionary funds under the Incentive
Mobility Program not to exceed twenty five percent (25%) of
the FY 1992-93 proposed Hermosa/Redondo Dial -A -Ride budget.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this
day of , 1992.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR
of the City of Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
APED
0 FO
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
p/ccrswave
June 1, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of
of the City Council June 9, 1992
APPROVE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION
SERVICES, INC. FOR SPACE IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER
(Room 6B)
RECOMMENDATION
The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and
staff recommend that Council approve the attached lease agreement
between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Los Angeles County Bar
Association Dispute Resolution Services to lease Room 6B in the
Community Center and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached
lease.
BACKGROUND
Dispute Resolution Services has leased Room 6B in
Center since October, 1988. Their current lease,
to the present square footage lease for Community
will expire on June 30, 1992.
ANALYSIS
the Community
which conforms
Center rooms,
The recommended lease is for a period of one year (July 1, 1992
through June 30, 1993). The rate for FY 1992-93 will be $.84 per
square foot, making the monthly lease payment $168. DRS has
proven to be dependable and cooperative tenants and have made all
lease payments as requested.
DRS provides a service whose goal is to resolve local disputes in
order to improve community and neighborhood relations and to
circumvent potentially escalating conflicts.
Concur:
Mary ey, Director
Com it Resources Dept.
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager
Respectfully submitted,
lY
Marsha Ernst
Administrative Aide
Community Resources Dept.
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland, Director
Finance Dept.
HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT
This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the
9th day of June
1992 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal
Corporation (City) and Los Angeles County Bar Assoc. Dispute
Resolution Services, Inc. (DRS) (Lessee).
A. RECITALS:
1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service
facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com-
munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility").
2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed
restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February
1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School
District and is further subject to certain provisions
imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop-
ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for
Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th
day of February 1978. These documents are on file in
the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public
documents and by reference are incorporated into this
leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD
and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS.
3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on
the terms and conditions set out herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period
of 1 year commencing on the 1st day
of July ,1992 , and ending on the
30th day of June ,1993
2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from
the City that portion of the facility described as:
Room 6B, 200 Sq. Ft.
3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac-
cording to the following schedule:
$168/mo. ($.84 per sq. ft.)
Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease
commences on a day other than the first day of the
month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement
of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the
remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay-
ment on the first day of the following month.
3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi-
tions are agreed to by the Lessee:
1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls,
ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's
written consent.
2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained
upon or attached to the outside of the premises except
such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such
signs shall be in accordance with the policy established
by the Lessor.
4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the
following purpose or purposes: Mediation Program
And for no other purpose without the express written consent
of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be
used in violation of the Depratment of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those
agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa
Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and
Urban Development.
5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at
all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive
General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee
in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to
any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any
one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com-
bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name
City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected
officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional
insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the
sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must
include the coverage and provisions indicated.
Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of
insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times
during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to
be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and
should state clearly:
(1) The additional insured requested;
(2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation
to the City of Hermosa Beach;
(3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional
Insured;
(4) Coverage included;
(5) Cross -liability clause.
WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and
maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work-
er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur-
nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of
such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or
materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written
notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach.
INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated
(B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide.
6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE.
Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con-
dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon
termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les-
see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or
alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear
and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de-
mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event
of a violation of this provision.
7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al-
terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the
premises without the expressed written approval of the City.
Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the
City from potential liens of labor and material persons.
8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR
BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City
has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the
event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises.
The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem-
ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and
effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during
said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc-
tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to
the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes
intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion
determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then
either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi-
nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each
other.
9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify
the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim
or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or
death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any di-
rect or indirect act or any omission of the lessee, its of-
ficers, agents and employees arising out of the lessee's use
of said premises. The lessee, at its own cost, expense and
risk shall defend any and all actions, suits or other pro-
ceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City
on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment
that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action,
suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof.
10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to
comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com-
munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City
Council.
11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any
and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any
governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises.
12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur-
suant to this lease within three days after written notice
from the City or to perform any other obligation required
pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after
notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease
to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue
all remedies available under the laws then existent in the
State of California.
13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur-
suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal-
ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States
mail, postage prepaid,
LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CITY HALL
1315 VALLEY DRIVE
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254
LESSEE: Los Angeles County Bar Assoc.
Dispute Resolution Services
617 S. Olive St./P. 0. Box 55020
Los Angeles, CA 90055-0020
Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this
paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the
deposit thereof in the United States mail.
14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any
action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this
lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion
of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its
attorneys fees.
15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or
sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ-
ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de-
nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City.
16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is
binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of
the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa
Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on
the day first hereinabove set forth.
ATTEST:
APPRO D S -0 FORM:
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a
Municipal Corporation, Lessor
By
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE: LESSEE:
A
June 1, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the City Council June 9, 1992
LEASE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC FOR
ROOM 7 IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER
RECOMMENDATION
The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and
staff recommend that Council approve a one year lease with the
South Bay Free Clinic for the use of Room 7 in the Community
Center and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached lease.
The Commission and staff further recommend that the lease payment
be waived for the first two months to allow the Free Clinic to
make necessary repairs/improvements to Room 7.
BACKGROUND
The Department of Community Resources recently received a request
from the South Bay Free Clinic for lease space (Room 7). Room 7
has recently become available due to the Hermosa Beach Historical
Society relocating to another area in the Community Center.
The South Bay Free Clinic was recently awarded a grant that will
enable them to lease office space. They propose to move the
administrative offices of the HIV Program to Room 7. It will
house the "hot line" and the staff of the program. They will
conduct meetings, training and occasionally support groups but
will not conduct any medical services.
Their HIV program has been in existence since 1987 and has been
housed at the Manhattan Beach clinic. This past year, demand for
services have tripled. Consequently, they require a larger space
to house their offices.
Because of limited funds, they are requesting a rent-free period
(2 months) to allow them to make improvements to the space.
There is currently a wooden construction within the room which
blocks the windows which they propose to remove. They also want
to construct one private office within the space (upon Public
Works approval). In addition, the space requires painting and
general clean-up.
ANALYSIS
It is recommended that the South Bay Free Clinic be allowed to
lease Room 7 in the Community Center with the stipulation that
the first two months (June 15 through Aug. 15, 1992) are rent
free. With recent budget cuts, the City is unable to pay for
needed improvements in order to make the space leasable. In the
past, the Public Works Dept. has prepared rooms for leasing by
painting, general cleanup, repairs, new light fixtures, etc.
- 1 -
1k
Revenue generated from the lease of Room 7 (1100 sq. ft.) will be
$924 per month ($.84 sq. ft.). The attached lease conforms to
the present square footage rental policy (approved by Council on
March 19, 1990). Council approval of the attached lease will
help to insure that this well established social service
organization continues to work in the community.
Respectfully submitted,
/=--
s---
Marsha
---Marsha Ernst
Administrative Aide
Community Resources Dept.
Concur:
gney, Director
ity Resoyrces Dept.
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact:
Viki Co'eland, Director
Finance Dept.
HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT
This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the
9th day of June
1992 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal
Corporation (City) and South Bay Free Clinic (Lessee).
A. RECITALS:
1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service
facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com-
munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility").
2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed
restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February
1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School
District and is further subject to certain provisions
imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop-
ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for
Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th
day of February 1978. These documents are on file in
the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public
documents and by reference are incorporated into this
leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD
and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS.
3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on
the terms and conditions set out herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period
of 1 year commencing on the 15 day
of June ,1992 , and ending on the
15th day of June ,1993 .
2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from
the City that portion of the facility described as:
Room 7 (1100 sq. ft.) Commnity Center
3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac
cording to the following schedule:
June 15 to August 15, 1992: Free
August 15: $462
September 1, 1992 through May 31, 1993: $924/mo
June 1, to June 15, 1993: $462
Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease
commences on a day other than the first day of the
month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement
of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the
remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay-
ment on the first day of the following month.
3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi-
tions are agreed to by the Lessee:
1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls,
ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's
written consent.
2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained
upon or attached to the outside of the premises except
such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such
signs shall be in accordance with the policy established
by the Lessor.
4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the
following purpose or purposes: Administrative offices
HIV Program
And for no other purpose without the express written consent
of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be
used in violation of the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those
agreements -are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa
Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and
Urban Development.
5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at
all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive
General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee
in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to
any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any
one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com-
bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name
City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected
officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional
insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the
sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must
include the coverage and provisions indicated.
Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of
insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times
during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to
be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and
should state clearly:
(1) The additional insured requested;
(2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation
to the City of Hermosa Beach;
(3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional
Insured;
(4) Coverage included;
(5) Cross -liability clause.
WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and
maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work-
er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur-
nish the City with a certificate showing proof of such
coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or material-
ly changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to:
City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach.
INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated
(B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide.
6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE.
Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con-
dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon
termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les-
see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or
alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear
and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de-
mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event
of a violation of this provision.
7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al-
terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the
premises without the expressed written approval of the City.
Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the
City from potential liens of labor and material persons.
8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR
BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City
has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the
event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises.
The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem-
ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and
effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during
said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc-
tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to
the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes
intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion
determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then
either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi-
nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each
other.
9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify
the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim
or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or
death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any di-
rect or indirect act or any omission of the lessee, its of-
ficers, agents and employees arising out of the lessee's use
of said premises. The lessee, at its own cost, expense and
risk shall defend any and all actions, suits or other pro-
ceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City
on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment
that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action,
suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof.
10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to
comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com-
munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City
Council.
11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any
and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any
governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises.
12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur-
suant to this lease within three days after written notice
from the City or to perform any other obligation required
pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after
notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease
to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue
all remedies available under the laws then existent in the
State of California.
13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur-
suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal-
ly served upon the partyy or deposited in the United States
mail, postage prepaid,
LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CITY HALL
1315 VALLEY DRIVE
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254
LESSEE: Suzanne Rivera, Executive Director
South Bay Free Clinic
1807 Manhattan Beach Blvd.
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this
paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the
deposit thereof in the United States mail.
14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any
action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this
lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion
of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its
attorneys fees.
15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or
sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ-
ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de-
nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City.
16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is
binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of
the parties.
14
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa
Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on
the day first hereinabove set forth.
ATTEST:
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a
Municipal Corporation, Lessor
By
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE: LESSEE:
5
June 2, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council June 9, 1992
SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT TO ELIMINATE SECTION 7.2-27 REGARDING
CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS
Recommendation
To adopt the attached resolution of intent.
Background
The City Council, at the meeting of May 19, 1992, directed staff
to prepare a resolution of intent to consider the elimination of
Section 7.2-27 of the zoning ordinance.
Analysis
Adoption of the attached resolution will start the process for
staff and Planning Commission to consider elimination or
amendment of Section 7.2-27.
—GONCUR _,7�
Michael Schubach
Pla ning
Director
nti
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager
Attachments
1. Proposed Resolution
Respectfully Submitted,
Kdri Robertson
Associate Planner
-
ii
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO STUDY ELIMINATING SECTION 7.2-27 OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDOMINIUM
CONVERSIONS
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting to discuss
eliminating Section 7.2-27 and made the following finding:
A. Sections 7.2-27, which allows the Planning Commission to
waive development standards of the zoning ordinance under
certain conditions in order to approve conversion of existing
multiple -family apartment buildings to condominiums, is
unclear and ambiguous in its intent, allowing a wide variety
of interpretation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby initiate
consideration to eliminate Section 7.2-27 of the Zoning Ordinance
and directs the Planning Commission to begin the study.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June, 1992.
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST: APPROVED AS�TOO� FORM:
CITY CLERK (?Z . ' s e CITY ATTORNEY
p/ccrsint
ieGe-/k-zu
June 1, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
The Hermosa Beach City Council June 9, 1992
CONSTRUCTION OF OWOSSO STORM DRAIN
Recommendations:
It is recommended that City Council receive and file this report
for construction of Owosso storm drain.
Background:
Los Angeles County Public Works has contracted construction of
Owosso storm drain to GR GO & Gorden Construction of Arcadia.
This project began May 17, 1992 and is anticipated to be complete
by June 17, 1992.
Analysis:
This project involves construction of a storm drain system
consisting of approximately 1,060 linear feet of 24 -inch diameter
reinforced concrete pipe. The project location is at the
intersection of Compana Street and Joy Avenue, running westerly
to Bonnie Brae, then southerly to 14th Street and westerly to
Pacific Coast Highway as shown on the attached sketch.
Construction of Owosso storm drain will alleviate the flooding to
residential properties in the sump area.
Fiscal Impact:
This project is a County project and is designed and funded by
Los Angeles County. Inspection and administration of Owosso
storm drain will be performed by the County.
Alternatives:
No alternatives are practical.
Attachment
Respectfully submitted,
Concur:
Not available
Homayoun Behboodi Lynn A. Terry
Assistant Engineer Deputy City Engineer
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager
pworks/CCITMOWO
OWOSSO DRAIN
V .`
COAOHA aT
OCEAN ORlvf
111111111111 IIUI1IVIII(III1Il11111111II(11111I1I1I11
PACIFIC 1Ic0A
ST
IHJIt pnl,III1IUULln,
`.PIER AYE.
r
LOCATION MAP
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
3-1.89
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND TG PG 62-08
PROPOSED DRAIN
EXISTING DRAIN II111I1(1111I
DIRECTION OF FLOW ---E-
Ex1S71HSUMP AREA0
Honorable Mayor and Members of
the Hermosa Beach City Council
Com.
June 3, 1992
Regular Meeting of
June 9, 1992
LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION SERVICE
AWARD OF CONTRACT
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council award the contract for Third
Party Administration of Liability Claims to Ward-THK and
authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a three year
contract with Ward-THK.
Background:
The current administrator for liability claims is Ward-THK.
Their three-year contract with the City expires on June 30, 1992.
The terms of the past three years for the Ward-THK contract were:
FY 89/90 1st
FY 90/91 2nd
FY 91/92 3rd
year:
year:
year:
$15,333 + $350/claim
$16,475 + $400/claim
$17,650 + $450/claim
over
over
over
48 claims
46 claims
44 claims
At the April 28, 1992 meeting City Council directed staff to
solicit proposals from interested Third Party Administrators of
Liability Claims. Following Council direction, staff advertised
and solicited proposals for third party administration of
liability claims. In an attempt to identify as many service
providers as possible, surrounding cities were contacted as well
as the Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA) for
names of service providers.
The following fourteen (14) firms received Request for Proposals:
Arthur Gallager & Co.
Bragg & Morse
Carl Warren & Company
Colen & Lee
Contract Claims Service
Crawford and Company
George Hills Company
Keenan & Associates
Lindsey Morden Service
Risk Management Services
Southland Claims Service
Specialty Risk Services
Ward-THK
Wear & Wood
The legal ad announcing the Request for Proposals appeared in the
EasyReader on May 7 and on May 14, 1992.
Sealed proposals from seven firms were received by the City
Clerk's office, publicly opened and read aloud in the City Hall
Council Chambers at 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, May 28, 1992 as
advertised. These proposals are available for review in the
Office of the City Clerk.
1
1n
Analysis:
Listed below is a display of the proposal costs submitted by the
responding firms:
COMPANY
1ST 2ND 3RD
YEAR YEAR YEAR
Ward -TAR
$17,700 $18,905 $20,105
Comments: (1) An additional cost of $350/claim over 50
claims/year applies. (2) After January 1, 1993, activity on
files in litigation are charged on a time -and -expense basis at
the following rates: Manager/Adjuster @ $55/hr; Clerical @
$22/hr; Mileage @ .42/mile; Photocopy @ .30/page. Second year
Manager @ $58/yr; Clerical @ $24/hr. Third year Manager @
$60/hr; Clerical @ $26/hr.
Colen & Lee $17,640 TBN TBN
Comments: (1) Colen & Lee will not quote 2nd and 3rd year cost.
Cost to be negotiated at expiration of each year. (2) Additional
charge for checks and Index Bureau membership.
Carl Warren & Co. NTE $50,000* NTE $52,500* NTE $55,125*
Takeover/setup: $1,030
* Comments: The fee proposal is based on a "Time & Expense" basis
with the above amounts being a "not -to -exceed" (NTE) figure.
Time and expense computed as follows: Investigative Services @
$39 - $40 - $41/hr (1st; 2nd; 3rd yr); Telephone @ 8% of
services; Mileage @ .40/mile; Photocopy @ .25/copy; Photographs @
$2.00 each; Stenographic @ $4.50/page; Office Expense @ $19.50.
Southland Claims Service $19,450 *
$21,675 * $23,630 *
Comments: (1) An additional $375/claim over 46; $440/claim over
44; and, $475/claim over 42 per year applies (1st - 2nd - 3rd
yr); (2) Start-up cost of approximately $3,875 for entry of
existing open and closed claims.
Crawford & Co.
$22,000 * $23,540 *
$25,188 *
* Comments: An additional charge of $321.50 applies to each claim
in excess of 43 claims per year.
Lindsey Morden Service
$17,750 * $17,000 * $19,000 *
Comments: (1) An additional charge of $387 - $412 - $437 (1st -
2nd - 3rd yr) applies to each claim in excess of 45 claims per
year. (2) Initial year includes $2,750 start-up costs. (3) An
additional charge of either $50/claim per month OR $500/open
claim applies for first year (cost: between approximately $12,000
- $22,000).
2
Specialty Risk Service $35,985*
$38,540* $41,280*
Comments: (1) Annual fee computed on basis of $734/claim for
General Liability/BI & PD; $553/claim for Auto Liability/BI & PD.
Per claim cost increases to $789/claim GL and $595/claim AL 2nd
year; $848/claim GL and $640/claim AL 3rd year. (2) Annual
amount includes $2,000/yr administrative fee. (3) An additional
$292/open claim charged for first year (approximately $12,848)
and $227/open claim remaining after first twelve months.
INTERVIEWS:
Responding firms were interviewed by a panel consisting of the
Personnel Director/Risk Manager; Finance Director; Public Safety
Director; and Mr. Mike Hodge, Culver City Risk Manager.
The interview panel rated the firms according to the following
criteria: knowledge and experience in serving public entity
self -insureds; responsiveness to RFP in proposal and
presentation; value received versus fee proposed; experience and
qualifications of personnel assigned to account; claims handling
philosophy; municipal experience; and reporting capability.
Following the interview, the firms were ranked as follows:
#1 Ward-THK
#2 Colen & Lee
#3 Carl Warren & Company
#4 Southland Claims Service, Inc.
The remaining firms were not considered further after the
interview because of their lack of municipal experience.
While the interview panel considered both Ward-THK and Colen &
Lee highly qualified, the recommendation is to maintain Ward-THK.
This recommendation is based on several primary factors.,
including: knowledge and experience of individual dedicated to
City's files; case load of assigned individual; and,
aggressiveness of approach in controlling costs both
pre -litigation and post -litigation.
At the time of the interview Colen & Lee had not determined who
would be assigned this city's files. That assignment would be
dependent on two factors: one being whether they are also awarded
contracts in three other agencies which would then necessitate
hiring additional personnel, one of whom would be assigned
Hermosa Beach; the other factor being, if not successful in
obtaining the other agencies business, which current adjuster
would be able to take on additional claims. The Claims Manager
who would have supervisory control over Hermosa's claims is
experienced in municipal claims but would not be assigned the
direct responsibility for day to day activity.
3
Another associated determinant in the panel's recommendation is
Ward-THK's philosophy toward periodic formal claims reviews and
file status reporting. Ward-THK's proposal, in response to the
RFP, included tri -annual claims reviews with the City Manager and
Risk Manager in addition to on-going communication (written and
oral) regarding file activity. Colen & Lee's stated position was
that copies of correspondence regarding file activity served as
the primary source of status up -dates with periodic meetings to
discuss general procedures and specific claims. While Colen and
Lee's approach is not entirely unsatisfactory, a comprehensive
file review on a scheduled basis is preferred.
Following the panel's recommendation, municipal references were
contacted for Ward-THK and Colen and Lee. Every contacted
reference expressed the utmost satisfaction with the performance
of the both firms in the area of responsiveness; ability to
obtain settlements; and litigation management.
A copy of the proposed service agreement is attached for the
Council's review.
Respectfully submitted:
Robert A. Blackwood, Director
Personnel and Risk Management
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
Q.�
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
Attachment: Service Agreement
pers/lia
4
Concur:
Frederick R. Ferrin
Steve Wisniewski
Public Safety Director
Viki Copeland
Finance Director.
CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION SERVICE AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into this day of
, 1992, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach,
hereafter referred to as the Client, and Ward-THK, hereafter
referred to as Ward.
SECTION I: SERVICES PROVIDED BY WARD
Ward agrees to perform the following services:
1. Review all claims submitted by the Client to Ward during the
term of the Agreement and handle pursuant to the Ward claims -
handling standards.
2. Coordinate all investigation of facts and damages.
3. Establish and maintain appropriate reserves for each claim.
4. Maintain a separate file for each claim, which shall be
available for review by the Client at any reasonable time.
5. Recommend settlement of claims to the Client and negotiate
settlement pursuant to authority extended by the Client.
6. Perform all reasonable and necessary administrative and
clerical work in conjunction with each claim, including the
preparation of checks or vouchers, release agreements and any
other documents needed to close a claim.
7. Coordinate all litigation activity with selected outside legal
counsel.
8. Notify the excess carrier on all excess
ICRMA reporting guidelines.
9. Attend court settlement conferences,
settlement conferences.
10. Attend Tri -annual Claim Reviews.
11.
claims, pursuant to
including voluntary
Manage the client's Trust Account and
statements of account.
provide monthly
12. Provide Management Information Reports according to the
client's schedule.
SECTION II: CLIENT:
The Client agrees to:
1. Report, in a timely manner, all claims and losses to Ward.
2. Provide adequate funds for payment of losses and expenses.
3. Provide up-to-date information on all excess insurance.
4. Establish settlement authority of $1,500 per claim.
5. Cooperate in the disposition of claims.
6. Cooperate in the investigation of all claims.
7. Pay promptly the Ward service fee.
SECTION III: INDEMNIFICATION
The Client agrees that it will indemnify and hold harmless
Ward and its directors, officers, employees, subsidiaries,
shareholders and affiliates from and against any and all claims,
loss, liability, costs, damages and reasonable attorney's fees
incurred by Ward as the direct or indirect result of any
misconduct, error or omission of the Client or any of the Client's
directors, officers, employees, subsidiaries or affiliates, taken
in connection with the furtherance or performance of any provision
of this Agreement, or as a result of instructions given by the
Client to Ward, which the latter follows, provided that said
claims, loss, liability costs, damages and reasonable attorney's
fees have not been directly caused by any misconduct, error or
omission by Ward, its directors, officers, employees, subsidiaries
and affiliates.
Ward agrees that it will indemnify and hold harmless the
Client and its directors, officers, employees, subsidiaries and
affiliates from and against any and all claims, loss, liability,
costs, damages and reasonable attorney's fees incurred as the
direct or indirect result of any misconduct, error or omission of
Ward or any of its directors, officers, employees, subsidiaries,
shareholders or affiliates, taken in connection with the
furtherance or performance of any provision of this Agreement,
provided that said claims, loss, liability, costs, damages and
reasonable attorney's fees have not been directly caused by any
misconduct, error or omission of the Client,. its directors,
officers, employees, subsidiaries and affiliates.
- 34 -
SECTION IV: CANCELLATION
Either party shall have the right to terminate or renegotiate
this Agreement by giving to the other party written notice of such
cancellation of the Agreement at least sixty (60) days in advance.
Ward shall have the right to cancel the Agreement by giving the
Client ten (10) days written notice of cancellation for non-payment
of the service fee. Upon cancellation, Ward will not be required
to provide additional services as outlined in this Agreement under
Section I.
In the event this Agreement is canceled by the Client for any
reason, the Client may choose one of the following options:
Option A: Renegotiate the services with Ward at fee to be
negotiated between Ward and the Client.
Option B: Require Ward to return all open and closed
files to the Client. The Client will be responsible for the pick-
up and delivery of the files.
SECTION V: INSURANCE:
Ward shall maintain Professional Liability coverage during the
term of this Agreement in the amount of One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00). Ward shall also maintain Fidelity Bond coverage
during the term of this Agreement in the amount of Five Hundred
Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00).
SECTION VI: TERM:
This Agreement shall be effective for a period of three years
from July 1, 1992, to June 30, 1995, and shall remain in force and
effect as amended or terminated as provided in the cancellation
clause.
SECTION VII: FEES:
The Client agrees to pay Ward service fees based on the
following schedule:
A. ADMINISTRATION FEE
JULY 1, 1992 - JUNE 30, 1993
Tri -annual Claims Review $ 750.00
Trust Account Management 500.00
Management Information Reports 250.00
TOTAL $ 1,500.00
- 35 -
Ad-hoc reports will be billed at $50.00 per hour
(one hour minimum) plus photocopy fee at .30Q page.
JULY 1, 1993 - JUNE 30, 1994
Tri -annual Claims Review $ 800.00
Trust Account Management 535.00
Management Information Reports $ 270.00
TOTAL $1,605.00
Ad-hoc reports will be billed at $50.00 per hour
(1 -hour minimum) plus photocopy fee at .30Q page.
JULY 1, 1994 - JUNE 30, 1995
Tri -annual Claims Review $ 850.00
Trust Account Management 565.00
Management Information Reports. . . . . 290.00
TOTAL $1,705.00
Ad-hoc reports will be billed at $50.00 per hour
(one hour minimum) plus photocopy fee at .304 page.
B. CLAIMS FEE -- NON -LITIGATED
JULY 1, 1992 - JUNE 30, 1993
Flat Fee Per Claim (Based on 5 -year Projection)
Property Damage
25 claims @ $325.00 $ 8,125.00
Bodily Injury
19 claims @ $425.00 $ 8,075.00
TOTAL $16,200.00
An additional $350.00 per claim will be assessed for each
non -litigated claim in excess of 50. This fee will be
calculated at the end of the contract year. Field
investigation is not included in the flat fee per claim.
JULY 1, 1993 - JUNE 30, 1994
Flat Fee Per Claim (Based on 5 -year Projection)
Property Damage
25 claims @ $350.00 $ 8,750.00
Bodily Injury
19 claims @ $450.00 $ 8,550.00
TOTAL $17,300.00
- 36 -
An additional $350.00 per claim will be assessed for each
non -litigated claim in excess of 50. This fee will be
calculated at the end of the contract year. Field
investigation is not included in the flat fee per claim.
JULY 1, 1994 - JUNE 30, 1995
Flat Fee Per Claim (Based on 5 -year Projection)
Property Damage
25 claims @ $375.00 $ 9,375.00
Bodily Injury
19 claims @ $475.00 $ 9,025.00
TOTAL $18,400.00
An additional $350.00 per claim will be assessed for each
non -litigated claim in excess of 50. This fee will be
calculated at the end of the contract year. Field
investigation is not included in the flat fee per claim.
C. LITIGATED CLAIMS FEE
JULY 1, 1992 - JUNE 30, 1993
Time & Expense
Litigation Manager
Adjuster
Clerical
Mileage
Photocopy
Miscellaneous
$55.00 per
$42 00 per
$22 00 per
$ .45 per
$ .30 per
Actual
hour
hour
hour
mile
copy
Cost
Effective July 1, 1992, all new litigated cases will
convert to Time and Expense billing. All litigated cases
pending as of June 30, 1992 will convert to. Time and
Expense billing effective January 1, 1993.
JULY 1, 1993 - JUNE 30, 1994
Time & Expense
Litigation Manager $58 00 per hour
Adjuster $45 00 per hour
Clerical $24 00 per hour
Mileage $ 45 per mile
Photocopy $ 30 per copy
Miscellaneous Actual Cost
r
1992.
JULY 1, 1994 -
Time & Expense
Litigation
Adjuster
Clerical
Mileage
Photocopy
JUNE 30, 1995
Manager . .
Miscellaneous
. .$60.00 per hour
$48 00 per hour
$26 00 per hour
$ 45 per mile
$ 30 per copy
Actual Cost
THESE FEES WILL BE PAID ON A MONTHLY BASIS, BEGINNING JULY,
In addition to the above service fees, and subject to the
Client's prior approval, the Client agrees to pay all allocated
expenses as defined below.
Allocated loss expenses means any cost or expense we
incur on your behalf as a result of our engaging the service
of firms or persons outside our organization for work in
connection with investigation, adjustment, settlement or
defense of a claim. Allocated loss expenses include, but are
not limited to the following: subrogation; rehabilitation;
automobile or other physical damage appraisal; all court
costs, fees and expenses; fees for service of process; fees to
attorneys; the cost of service of undercover operations and
detective; fees for independent adjusters or attorneys for
investigation or adjustment of claims in areas removed from
reasonable access to our salaried employees; the cost of
employing experts for purpose of preparing maps, photographs,
diagrams and chemical or physical analysis, or for expert
advice or opinion; the cost of obtaining copies of any public
records; and the costs of depositions and court reports or
recorded statements.
SECTION VIII: DISPOSITION OF CLOSED FILES:
Ward-THK maintains closed files for a period of five years
after the date of closure. After the claim file has been closed 5
years, the Client agrees to authorize destruction of Ward's claim
file or bear the cost of shipment of the file to the Client's
facility.
i
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to
be executed on their behalf by the undersigned duly authorized
persons.
City of Hermosa Beach Ward-THK
By: By:
Title: Title:
Date: Date:
Approved as to form:
42e
(Ci y torney)
June 2, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council June 9, 1992
REQUEST FOR 30 DAY EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT FOR THE
ACTING GENERAL SERVICES DIRECTOR
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council extend for thirty (30)
days the temporary appointment of the Acting General Services
Director.
Background:
The Acting General Services Director was appointed on May 22,
1991. Filling of this position is being held pending review of
the organizational structure of the Parking Enforcement Division.
Analysis:
Section 2-33 of the Hermosa Beach City Code precludes a temporary
appointment of an individual to a permanent Civil Service
position for more than six months without approval from the City
Council every thirty days.
Respectfully submitted,'�
Robert A. Blackwood
Personnel Director
rab/extend
1
Concur:
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager
May 27, 1992
City Council Meeting
June 9, 1992
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
ORDINANCE NO. 92-1069 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 7, ARTICLES I, II, III, IV,
AND CHAPTER 24 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO BUILDING AND PLUMBING
REGULATIONS AND ADOPTING WITH CERTAIN ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND
AMENDMENTS, WHICH ARE SET FORTH HEREIN, THE RULES, REGULATIONS,
PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THOSE CERTAIN CODES
ENTITLED, "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1991 EDITION", "UNIFORM
BUILDING CODE STANDARDS, 1991 EDITION", "UNIFORM HOUSING CODE,
1991 EDITION", AND "UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS
BUILDINGS, 1991 EDITION", PROMULGATED AND PUBLISHED BY THE
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS AND THE "UNIFORM
PLUMBING CODE, 1991 EDITION" AND "UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, 1991
EDITION" PROMULGATED AND PUBLISHED JOINTLY BY THE INTERNATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS AND THE
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS."
Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 92-1069, relating to the
above subject.
At the meeting of May 26, 1992, this ordinance was presented to
Council for consideration, and was introduced by the following
vote:
AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Essertier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Elaine Doerfling, Cit Clerk
Concur:
Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO. 92- 1069
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
CHAPTER 7, ARTICLES I, II, III, IV, AND CHAPTER 24 OF THE CITY
CODE RELATING TO BUILDING AND PLUMBING REGULATIONS AND ADOPTING
WITH CERTAIN ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND AMENDMENTS, WHICH ARE SET
FORTH HEREIN, THE RULES, REGULATIONS, PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS
SET FORTH IN THOSE CERTAIN CODES ENTITLED, "UNIFORM BUILDING
CODE, 1991 EDITION", "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS, 1991
EDITION", "UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, 1991 EDITION", AND "UNIFORM CODE
FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, 1991 EDITION",
PROMULGATED AND PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF
BUILDING OFFICIALS AND THE "UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, 1991 EDITION"
AND "UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, 1991 EDITION" PROMULGATED AND
PUBLISHED JOINTLY BY THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING
AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS AND THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF
BUILDING OFFICIALS.
WHEREAS, the 1991 editions of the Uniform Codes have been
adopted by the State of California Building Standards Commission,
with amendments, to represent the construction regulations for
all structures within California; and
WHEREAS, local amendmentsmay be made'to those codes to
address local needs; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that local climatic con-
ditions and congestion require amendments to further promote
fire safety by eliminating combustible roofing and expanding the
requirements for automatic fire -extinguishing systems.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That Chapter 7, Article I of the City Code of the
City of Hermosa Beach is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Section 7-1. Adoption of Uniform Building Code and Standards.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Government Code of the State
of California, those certain codes designated as the "Uniform
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 -�
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Building Code, 1991 Edition" including appendix excepting
Chapters 7, 12 div. 1, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 53 of said appendix and
the "Uniform Building Code Standards, 1991 Edition" published by
the International Conference of Building Officials, one (1) copy
of which is on file in the office of the city clerk for public
record and inspection, are hereby adopted by reference and made a
part of this chapter as though set forth in this chapter in full,
subject, however, to the amendments, additions and deletions set
forth in this chapter and by the State of California, Building
Standards Commission and said codes shall comprise the building
code for the City of Hermosa Beach.
Whenever the word "jurisdiction" appears in said codes, it
shall mean and refer to the City of Hermosa Beach.
Whenever the term "building official" appears in said
building code it shall mean and refer to the Director of Building
and Safety of the City of Hermosa Beach."
SECTION 2. That Section 7-1.1. is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 7-1.1. Board of Appeals
Section 204 of said building code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Section 204. (a) General. In order to hear and decide appeals
of orders, decisions or determinations made by the building
official relative to the application and interpretation of this
code, there shall be and is hereby created a Board of Appeals
consisting of five (5) members who are qualified by experience
and training to pass upon matters pertaining to building
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
construction and who are not employees of the jurisdiction.
The building official shall be an ex officio member of and shall
act as secretary to said board but shall have no vote upon any
matter before the board. The Board of Appeals shall be appointed
by the governing body and shall hold office at its pleasure. The
governing board shall adopt rules of procedure for conducting its
business and shall render all decisions and findings in writing
to the appellant with a duplicate copy to the building official.
(b) Limitations of Authority. The Board of Appeals shall
have no authority relative to interpretation of the administra-
tive provisions of this code nor shall the Board be empowered to
waive requirements of this code.
(c) Quorum Meetings. Three (3) members of said board
shall constitute a quorum. The board shall elect one of its
members to act as chairman.
Not less than three (3) days prior to a meeting of said board,
written notice shall be given to each member personally, or by
registered mail, provided, however, that any meeting of said
board shall be legal for any purpose if the written consent of
all members of said board to such meeting is executed and filed
in the records of such board.
Such board shall have the right, subject to such limits as the
council may prescribe by resolution, to employ at the cost and
expense of said city such practicing architects, competent
builders, attorneys and structural engineers as said board in its
discretion may deem reasonable and necessary to assist in its
- 3 -
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
investigation and in making its findings and decisions".
SECTION 3. That Section 7-1.2. is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 7-1.2. Violations.
Section 205 of said building code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Section 205.
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or cor-
poration to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move,
improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy or
maintain any building or structure or cause or permit the same
to be done in violation of this code.
Any person violating any of the provisions,of this chapter or
said building code shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and
shall be punishable as set forth in Chapter 1, Section 1-7 of the
Hermosa Beach City Code."
SECTION 4. That Section 7-1.3. is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 7-1.3. Fees.
Section 304 of said building code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Sec. 304. (a) General. Fees shall be assessed in accordance
with the provisions of this section.
- 4 -
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(b) Permit Fees. The fee for each permit shall be as set
forth in the latest resolution adopted by the City Council. The
determination of value or valuation under any of the provisions
of this code shall be made by the building official.
Where work for which a permit is required by this code is started
or proceeded with prior to obtaining said permit, the fees above
specified shall be quadrupled, but the payment of such quadrupled
fee shall not relieve any persons from fully complying with the
requirements of this code in the execution of the work nor from
any other penalties prescribed herein.
(c) Plan Review Fees. When a plan or other data are
required to be submitted by Subsection (b) of Section 302, a plan
review fee shall be paid at the time of submitting plans and
specifications for review. Said plan review fee shall be 65
percent of the building permit fee.
The plan review fees specified in this subsection are separate
fees from the building permit fees specified in Section 304 (a)
and are in addition to said permit fees.
Where plans are incomplete or changed so as to require additional
plan review, an additional plan review fee shall be*charged at
the rate indicated in the adopted resolution.
(d) Expiration of Plan Review. Applications for which no
permit is issued within 180 days following the date of applica-
tion shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data sub-
mitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or
destroyed by the building official. The building official may
- 5 -
7
L
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 �+
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not
exceeding 180 days upon request by the applicant showing that
circumstances beyond the control of the applicant have prevented
action from being taken. No application shall be extended more
than once. In order to renew action on an application after
expiration, the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan
review fee.
(e) Fee Refunds.
1. The building official may authorize the refunding of any fee
paid hereunder which was erroneously paid or collected.
2. The building official may authorize the refunding of not more
than 80 percent of the permit fee paid'when no work has been
done under a permit issued in accordance with this code.
3. The building official may authorize the refunding of not more
than 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an
application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been
paid is withdrawn or cancelled before any plan reviewing is
done.
The building official shall not authorize the refunding of any
fee paid except upon written application filed by the original
permittee not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment.
(f) Special Inspections For Change of Occupancy or Tenancy.
(1) In order to safeguard life, limb, health, property and
public welfare, every commercial and industrial building,
structure or portion thereof shall conform to the require-
- 6 -
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 �-
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ments for the occupancy to be housed therein, or for the
use to which the building, structure or portion thereof is
to be put, as set forth in the building, plumbing,
electrical and fire prevention codes of the City for the
proposed occupancy, that portion shall be made to conform.
(2) Each change of occupancy or tenancy of any commercial or
industrial building, structure or portion thereof shall
require an inspection to be made by the Building and Fire
Departments. If a portion of any building or structure
does not conform to the requirements of the building,
plumbing, electrical and fire prevention codes of the
City for the proposed occupancy, that portion shall be
made to conform.
(3) Before any commercial or industrial building or structure
may be occupied, there shall be approval from the Building
and Fire Departments.
(4) The Building and Fire Departments shall advise the owner or
tenant of those alterations necessary to make the building
comply, or, if none, approval shall be given.
(5)
The building official may allow occupancy of the building or
structure without requiring complete compliance with all the
requirements of the codes of the City, provided that such
occupancy does not result in increased hazard to life, limb,
health, property or public welfare.
(6) Before any inspections will be made by the Building or Fire
Departments for such change of occupancy or tenancy, there
- 7 -
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
shall be paid to the Building Department a fee as indicated
in the latest resolution adopted by the City Council to
cover the cost of inspection of the building for which the
change is desired. Such fee shall be in addition to the
regular building permit fee required by the building code
of the City".
SECTION 5. That Section 7-1.8. is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 7-1.8. Moving Buildings.
Section 302 of said building code is hereby amended by adding
thereto the following subsection (e) to read as follows:
(e) Moving Buildings. To obtain a permit to move a building
into the City or to move any building or structure from
one location within the City to another, the applicant
shall, in addition to the information required in sub-
sections, (a), (b), (c) and (d) hereof, furnish the
following information:
(1) The age of the building, which shall be verified by
by Building Department in the City in which said
building was erected.
(2) Provide a plot plan, which shall include precise new
location of building in relation to property lines.
(3)
Submit a floor plan of all floors of said building.
Plan shall be drawn to scale of one-eighth inch or
one-quarter inch equals one foot.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(4) Furnish a sketch or plan showing the size and general
design of the building.
(5)
Submit four (4) photographs, eight (8) inches by ten
(10) inches in size, showing the front, rear and side
views of the building, and three (3) photographs of the
front and side views of the proposed location.
After the applicant has filed such application, the building
official of the City shall inspect said building for all
necessary requirements and for the purpose of ascertaining
whether structurally the same complies with this code, and having
made such inspection, the building official shall make findings
showing the result of such inspection and refer the same,
together with the written application, sketches and photographs,
to the Planning Commission of the City.
The applicant shall then pay to the Planning Commission a review
fee of one hundred dollars ($100.00). The Planning Commission
shall hold hearings notice of which to be given to the applicant
and to other interested persons in the neighborhood of the
proposed location, such notice to be in form and at such time as
deemed reasonable to the Planning Commission. After the hearing
and within 10 days, the Planning Commission shall make its
recommendations to the building official of the City, as to
whether or not a permit shall be granted, and if the Planning
Commission recommends that a permit be granted, then the
building official shall file with the City Council the findings
of the Planning Commission and all pertinent information
relating to said application within 30 days of receipt of the
9
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21-•
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Planning Commission's recommendation for Council's final
approval.
After final approval from the City Council, the building official
shall require the applicant to file with the building official a
bond equal to the amount of the estimated cost of placing such
building on a foundation as required by this code, and preparing,
altering or improving such structure to meet the requirements of
this code and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and
the City Council. Such bond may be a cash bond in said amount of
estimated cost or a surety bond, but, if a surety bond, it shall
be in double the amount of the estimated cost, and the sureties
thereon shall appear before the building official and satisfy him
as to their financial worth and ability to'pay to the City the
amount of the surety bond in the event it is necessary for the
City to bring action thereon. Such bonds shall be payable to the
City and shall be conditioned upon the construction and
completion of the structure in compliance with this code and the
requirements of the Planning Commission and the City Council, and
for the payment of materialmen and laborers, furnishing material.,
and laborers for the rebuilding or completion of the structure,
with foundation, as required by this code and the recommendations
of the Planning Commission and the City Council."
SECTION 6. That Section 7-1.9. is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 7-1.9. Roof Covering Requirements
Section 3203 of said building code is hereby amended to read as
- 10 -
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
follows:
Section 3203. The roof covering on any structure regulated by
this code shall be as specified in Table No. 32-A and as class-
ified in Section 3204, except that the minimum roof covering
assembly shall be a class "B" roofing assembly.
The roof -covering assembly includes the roofdeck, underlayment,
interlayment, insulation and covering which is assigned a roof -
covering classification."
SECTION 7. That Section 7-1.10. shall be amended to read as
follows:
"Section 3404 of said building code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Section 3404. All skylight frames shall be constructed of non-
combustible materials. Skylights, the glazing of which is set
at an angle of less than 45 degrees from the horizontal, shall be
mounted at least 4 inches above the plane of the roof on a curb
constructed as required for the type of construction.
SECTION 8. That Section 7.1.11. is hereby amended to read
as follows:.
"Section 7.1.11. Fire Extinguishing Systems.
Section 3802 (c) 1 of said building code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
(c) Group A Occupancies. 1. Drinking Establishments.
An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in rooms used
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 -1
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
by the occupants for the consumption of alcoholic beverages and
unseparated accessory uses where the total area of such
unseparated rooms and assembly uses exceeds 3,500 square feet.
For uses to be considered as separated, the separation shall not
be less than as required for a one-hour occupancy separation.
The area of other uses shall be included unless separated by at
least a one-hour separation.
Section 3802 (c) 3 of said building code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
3. Exhibition and Display Rooms. An automatic sprinkler
system shall be installed in Group A Occupancies which have more
than 3,500 square feet of floor area which can be used for
exhibition or display purposes.
Section 3802 (d) of said building code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
(d) Group B, Division 2 Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler
system shall be installed in retail sales rooms classed as Group
B, Division 2 Occupancies where the floor area exceeds 3,500
square feet on any floor or 5,000 square feet on all floors or in
Group B, Division 2 retail sales occupancies more than one story
in height. The area of mezzanines shall be included in
determining the areas where sprinklers are required.
Section 3802 (h) of said building code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
- 12 -
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(h) Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler
system shall be installed throughout every apartment house three
or more stories in height or where the floor area exceeds 5,000
square feet, and every hotel three or more stories in height or
where the floor area exceeds 5,000 square feet. Residential or
quick -response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in the
dwelling unit and guest room portions of the building.
Table No. 38-A - Standpipe Requirements of said building code is
hereby amended to substitute the term "3 stories" wherever the
term "4 stories" appears in said table.
SECTION 9. That Section 7.1.12. is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 7.1.12. Fire Alarm Systems.
The first paragraph of Section 1211 shall be amended to read as
follows:
Section 1211. A manual and automatic approved fire alarm system
shall be installed in apartment houses that are three or more
stories in height or contain more than 15 dwelling units and in
hotels three or more stories in height or containing 20 or more
guest rooms, in accordance with the Fire Code. For the purposes
of this section, lofts or mezzanines shall be considered as
stories."
SECTION 10. That Section 7-2. is hereby amended to read as
follows:
- 13 -
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 .H
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
"Section 7-2. Adoption of Uniform Housing Code.
"That certain code designated as the "Uniform Housing Code, 1991
Edition," published by the International Conference of Building
Officials, one copy of which is on file in the office of the City
Clerk for public record and inspection, is hereby adopted by
reference and made a part of this chapter as though set forth in
this chapter in full, subject, however, to the amendments,
additions and deletions set forth in this chapter, and said code
shall be known as the Housing Code of this City.
Whenever the term "jurisdiction" appears in said code it shall
mean and refer to the City of Hermosa Beach, Whenever the term
"building official" appears in said code, it shall mean and refer
to the Director of Building and Safety of the City of Hermosa
Beach."
SECTION 11. That Section 7-3. is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 7-3. Adoption of Uniform Code for the Abatement of
Dangerous Buildings.
"That certain code designated as the "Uniform Code for the Abate -
went of Dangerous Buildings, 1991 Edition," published by the
International Conference of Building Officials, one (1) copy of
which is on file in the office of the City Clerk for public
record and inspection, is hereby adopted by reference and made a
part of this chapter as though set forth in this chapter in full,
subject, however, to the amendments, additions and deletions set
forth in this chapter, and said code shall be known as the
- 14 -
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21-•
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
abatement of dangerous buildings code of this City.
Whenever the term "jurisdiction" appears in said code it shall
mean and refer to the City of Hermosa Beach. Whenever the term
"building official" appears in said code it shall mean and refer
to the Director of Building and Safety of the City of Hermosa
Beach."
SECTION 12. That Section 7-3.1. is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 7-3.1. Board of Appeals
Section 205. of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous
Buildings is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 205. (a) General. In order to hear and decide appeals
of orders, decisions or determinations made by the building
official relative to the application and interpretations of this
code, there shall be and is hereby created a Board of Appeals
consisting of members who are qualified by experience and
training to pass upon matters pertaining to building construction
and who are not employees of the jurisdiction. Said board shall
be the same Board of Appeals specified in Section 204 of the
Uniform Building Code as amended by Section 7-1.1. of this Code.
The building official shall be an ex officio.member and shall act
as secretary to said board but shall have no vote upon any matter
before the board. The Board of Appeals shall be appointed by the
governing body and shall hold office at its pleasure. The board
shall adopt rules of procedure for conducting its business and
- 15 -
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 --�
22,
23
24
25
26
27
28
shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the
appellant, with a duplicate copy to the building official.
Appeals to the board shall be processed in accordance with the
provisions contained in Section 1201 of this code. Copies of all
rules or regulations adopted by the board shall be delivered to
the building official, who shall make them freely accessible to
the public.
(b) Limitations of Authority. The Board of Appeals shall have
no authority relative to interpretation of the administrative
provisions of this code nor shall the board be empowered to waive
requirements of this code."
SECTION 13. That Section 7-4. is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 7-4. Adoption of Uniform Mechanical Code.
That certain code designated as the "Uniform Mechanical Code,
1991 Edition," including "Appendices A, B and C" contained
therein, published jointly by the International Association of
Plumbing and Mechanical Officials and the International
Conference of Building Officials, one (1) copy of which is on
file in the office of the City Clerk for public record and
inspection, is hereby adopted by reference and made a part of
this chapter as though set forth in this chapter in full,
subject, however, to the amendments, additions and deletions set
forth in this chapter and by the State of California Building
Standards Commission and said code shall be known as the
Mechanical Code of the City of Hermosa Beach.
- 16 -
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Whenever the term "jurisdiction" appears in said code it shall
mean and refer to the City of Hermosa Beach. Whenever the term
"building official" appears in said code it shall mean and refer
to the Director of Building and Safety of the City of Hermosa
Beach."
SECTION 14. That Section 7-4.1. is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 203. of said mechanical code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
Section 203. (a) General. In order to hear and decide appeals
of orders, decisions or determinations made by the building
official relative to the application and interpretations of this
code, there shall be and is hereby created a Board of Appeals
consisting of members who are qualified by experience and
training to pass upon matters pertaining to mechanical design,
construction and maintenance and public health aspects of
mechanical systems and who are not employees of the jurisdiction.
Said board shall be the same Board of Appeals specified in
Section 204 of the Uniform Building Code as amended by Section
7-1.1. of this Code.
The building official shall be an ex officio member and shall act
as secretary to said board but shall have no vote upon any matter
before the board. The Board of Appeals shall be appointed by the
governing body and shall hold office at its pleasure. The board
shall adopt rules of procedure for conducting its business and
shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the
appellant, with a duplicate copy to the building official.
- 17 -
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(b) Limitations of Authority. The Board of Appeals shall have
no authority relative to interpretation of the administrative
provisions of this code nor shall the board be empowered to waive
requirements of this code."
SECTION 15. That Section 7-4.3. is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 7-4.3. Mechanical Permit Fees.
Sections 304(b) and 304(c) of said mechanical code are hereby
amended to read as follows:
Section 304 (b) Permit Fees. The fee for each permit shall
be as set forth in the latest resolution adopted by the
City Council.
Section 304 (c) Plan Review Fees. When a plan or other data
are required to be submitted pursuant to Section 302(b), a plan
review fee shall be paid at the time of submitting plans and
specifications for review. Said plan review fee shall be equal
to fifty (50) percent of the mechanical permit fee."
SECTION 16. That Section 24-1. is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 24-1. Adoption of Uniform Plumbing Code.
That certain code entitled "Uniform Plumbing Code, 1991 Edition",
including appendices and the Installation Standards contained
therein, promulgated and published jointly by the International
Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials and the
- 18 -
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21-�
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
International Conference of Building Officials, one (1) copy of
which is on file in the office of the City Clerk for public
record and inspection, is hereby adopted by reference and made a
part of this chapter as though set forth in this chapter in full,
subject, however, to the amendments, additions and deletions set
forth in this chapter and by the State of California Building
Standards Commission and said code shall be known as the Plumbing
Code of the City of Hermosa Beach.
Whenever the term "jurisdiction" appears in said code it shall
mean and refer to the City of Hermosa Beach. Whenever the term
"building official" appears in said code it shall mean and refer
to the Director of Building and Safety of the City of Hermosa
Beach."
SECTION 17. That Section 24-2. is hereby deleted in its
entirety.
SECTION 18. That Section 24-2.4. is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 24-2.4. Fees.
The schedule of fees contained in Section 30.4(a) of the Uniform
Plumbing Code is hereby deleted and the schedule of fees adopted
by latest resolution of the City Council hereby substituted
therefore."
SECTION 19. That Section 24-2.5. is hereby amended to read as
follows:
- 19 -
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 -�
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
"Section 24-2.5. Board of Appeals
Section 20.4. is hereby added to said plumbing code to read as
follows:
Section 20.4. (a) General. In order to hear and decide appeals
of orders, decisions or determinations made by the building
official relative to the application and interpretations of this
code, there shall be and is hereby created a Board of Appeals
consisting of members who are qualified by experience and
training to pass upon matters pertaining to plumbing design,
construction and maintenance and public health aspects of
plumbing systems and who are not employees of the jurisdiction.
Said board shall be the same Board of Appeals specified in
Section 204. of the Uniform Building Code as amended by Section
7-1.1. of this Code.
The building official shall be an ex officio member and shall act
as secretary to said board but shall have no vote upon any matter
before the board. The Board of Appeals shall be appointed by the
governing body and shall hold office at its pleasure. The board,
shall adopt rules of procedure for conducting its business and
shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the
appellant, with a duplicate copy to the building official.
(b) Limitations of Authority. The Board of Appeals shall have
no authority relative to interpretation of the administrative
provisions of this code nor shall the board be empowered to
waive requirements of this code."
- 20 -
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECTION 20. That Section 24-2.6. is hereby deleted in its
entirety.
SECTION 21. That Section 24-2.9. is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 24-2.9. Abandoned Sewers and Sewage Disposal
Facilities.
Section 1119 (a) of said plumbing code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
Section 1119 (a). Abandoned sewers and sewage disposal
facilities.
Every abandoned building (house) sewer or part thereof shall be
plugged or capped in an approved manner as designated by the
building official. Before any person plugs and/or caps such
sewer or sewage disposal facilities contemplated in this
section, he shall first post a cash bond with the City in an
amount of not less than one hundred dollars ($100.00) to
guarantee capping of such sewers and/or sewage disposal
facilities, such bond to be returned to the permittee upon
completion and inspection to the satisfaction of the building
official."
SECTION 22. Effective Date. That this ordinance shall become
effective and be in full force and effect thirty (30) days
following adoption.
SECTION 23. Publication. That the City Council does hereby
designate the City Attorney to prepare a summary of this
- 21 -
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ordinance to be published pursuant to Government Code Section
36933(c) (1) in lieu of the full text of said ordinance. That
prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of
its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary to be
published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general
circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa
Beach.
SECTION 24. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book
or original ordinances of said city; shall make minutes of the
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings
of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF
1992.
PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM
- 22 -
May 27, 1992
City Council Meeting
June 9, 1992
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
ORDINANCE NO. 92-1070 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING EXISTING CHAPTER 12 OF THE HERMOSA
BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE,
THE 1991 EDITIONS OF THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, INCLUDING APPENDIX
CHAPTERS III -A, III -B, III -C, VI -A, VI -C AND THE UNIFORM FIRE
CODE STANDARDS, AS AMENDED."
Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 92-1070, relating to the
above subject.
At the meeting of May 26, 1992, this ordinance was presented to
Council for consideration, and was introduced by the following
vote:
AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Essertier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Elaine Doerfling, CitClerk
Concur:
Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager
f} h
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO. 92-1070
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
REPEALING EXISTING CHAPTER 12 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH
MUNICIPAL CODE IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE,
THE 1991 EDITIONS OF THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, INCLUDING
APPENDIX CHAPTERS III -A, Ill -B, III -C, VI -A, VI -C AND THE
UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS, AS AMENDED.
WHEREAS, the 1991 editions of the Uniform Fire Codes have been
adopted by the State of California, with amendments; and
WHEREAS, local amendments may be made to those codes to address
local needs; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that local climactic conditions and -
congestion require amendments to further promote fire safety by
eliminating combustible roofing and expanding the requirements for
automatic fire -extinguishing systems.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The existing Chapter 12 of the "Hermosa Beach Municipal
Code" is repealed in it's entirety.
SECTION 2. A new Chapter 12 is added to the "Hermosa Beach
Municipal Code" to read as follows:
CHAPTER 12
FIRE PREVENTION CODE
SECTION 12-1. Adoption of Uniform Fire Code and Standards.
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
There is hereby adopted by the city for the purpose of prescribing
regulations governing conditions hazardous to life and property from fire
and explosion that certain Code and Standards known as the Uniform Fire
Code and the Uniform Fire Code Standards published by the Western Fire
Chiefs Association and the International Conference of Building Officials,
being particularly the 1991 Editions thereof, save and except such
portions as are hereinafter deleted, modified or amended by section 12-7
of this ordinance, three (3) copies of which Code and Standards have been
and are now filed in the office of the city clerk and the same are hereby
adopted and incorporated as fully as if set out at length herein, and from
the date on which this chapter shall take effect, the provisions thereof
shall be controlling within the limits of the City of Hermosa Beach.
Permits as required by provisions within this code may be issued for an
indefinite period of time, subject, however, to the right of the fire chief
on his designee to revoke said permit for misuse or violation of the terms
of the permit.
SECTION 12-2. Definitions.
(a) "Jurisdiction". Shall mean the City of Hermosa Beach.
(b) "Corporation Counsel". Shall mean the attorney fog the City of
Hermosa Beach.
(c) "Building Code". Shall mean the current Edition of Volume I, II and
IV of the Building Code published by the International Conference of
Building Officials, including its revisions, additions, and
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
amendments and including the current edition of the Uniform
Building Code Standards.
(d) "May". Shall mean permissible; the word "shall" is held to mean
mandatory.
SECTION 12-3. Establishment of limits of districts in which
storage of explosives and blasting agents is to be prohibited.
The limits referred to in section 77.107(b) of the Uniform Fire Code, in
which storage of explosives and blasting agents is prohibited, are hereby
established as follows: All property zoned for residential and commercial
uses.
SECTION 12-4. Establishment of limits of districts in which
storage of flammable liquids in outside aboveground tanks is to
be prohibited.
The limits referred to in section 79.501 of the Uniform Fire Code in which
storage of flammable liquids in outside aboveground tanks is prohibited,
are hereby established as follows: All property zoned for residential and
commercial uses.
SECTION 12-5. Establishment of limits of districts in which
new bulk plants for flammable or combustible liquids are to be
prohibited.
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The limits referred to in section 79.1401 of the Uniform Fire Code, in
which new bulk plants for flammable or combustible liquids are
prohibited, are hereby established as follows: All property zoned for
residential and commercial uses.
SECTION 12-6. Establishment of limits in which bulk storage of
liquified petroleum gases is to be prohibited.
The limits referred to in section 82.103(a) of the Uniform Fire Code, in
which storage of liquified petroleum gas is restricted, are hereby
established as follows: All property zoned for residential and commercial
uses.
SECTION 12-7. Amendments made in the yniform Fire Code.
The Uniform Fire Code, 1991 Edition is hereby amended and changed in the
following respects:
SECTION 10.507(A), Article 10, Division V, Entitled Automatic
Fire -extinguishing Systems is amended to read as follows:
(c) Group A. Occupancies. 1. Drinking Establishments.
An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in rooms used by the
occupants for the consumption of alcoholic beverages and unseparated
accessory uses where the total area of such rooms and assembly uses
exceeds 3500 square feet. For uses to be considered as separated, the
separation shall be not less than as required for a one-hour occupancy
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
separation. The area of other uses shall be included unless separated by
at least a one-hour occupancy separation.
(3) Exhibition and Display Rooms.
An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in Group A Occupancies
which have more than 3500 square feet of floor area which can be used for
exhibition or display purposes.
(d) Group B, Division 2 Occupancies.
An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in retail sales room
classed as Group B, Division 2 Occupancies where the floor area exceeds
3500 square feet on any floor or 5000 square feet on all floors or in Group
B, Division 2 Retail Sales Occupancies more than one story in height. The
area of mezzanines shall be included in determining the area where
sprinklers are required.
(h) Group R, Division 1 Occupancies.
An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout every
apartment house three or more stories in height or containing more than
5000 feet on all floors, and every hotel three or more stories in height or
containing more than 5000 feet on all floors. Residential or quick
-response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in the dwelling unit and
guest room portions of the building.
Table No. 10.510(A) of Article 10, Division V, Standpipe
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Requirements, is hereby amended so that three stories shall be
substituted wherever the table refers to four stories.
SECTION 11.101. Article II, Division 1 of the Uniform Fire Code,
entitled "Bonfires and Outdoor Rubbish Fires", is hereby amended
to read as follows:
Division II. SECTION 11.201. Incinerators, Open Burning and
Commercial Barbecue Pits.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to ignite, set
fire to, or cause or permit to be ignited or burned, any grass, weeds, trees,
brush, paper, shavings, boxes, trash, rubbish, or other combustible
materials within the city, except and unless such combustible materials
are burned in approved multiple -chamber incinerators, which have been
first approved by the fire chief of the city and the chief building inspector
of the city, and such approval is granted in writing by such officers.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, it shall be
lawful for any person to set fire and burn combustible materials in any
permanent fireplace, grill, or barbecue pit, providing such burning is for •
the purpose of preparing food or providing heat for human habitation, but
in no case shall such burning be for the purpose of disposing: of
combustible trash or rubbish. All such fires shall be kept under competent
and continuous supervision and all flammable and combustible material
near any such fireplace, grill, or barbecue pit, shall be removed a
sufficient distance so as not to constitute a fire hazard.
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(c) Outdoor fires such as pit barbeques or bonfires held in connection
with special activities, but not otherwise prohibited by city or county
ordinances may be permitted, if in the opinion of the Fire Chief, such fires
do not create a hazard to persons or property, by obtaining a permit from
the fire department.
(d) For the purpose of safety, all outdoor fires when not kindled or
maintained within a permanent fireplace, grill, or barbecue pit, shall be
deemed unlawful without a permit from the fire department. The Fire
Chief may prohibit all outdoor fires when atmospheric conditions or local
circumstances make such fires hazardous.
SECTION 11.202. Article 11, Division II, of the Uniform Fire
Code, 1991 Edition, is hereby amended to read as follows:
SECTION 11.202. Types and Construction of Incinerators.
(a) Every incinerator used within this jurisdiction shall be constructed
and maintained in accordance with the requirements of the Los Angeles
County Air Pollution Control District, and the Building Code and
Mechanical Code of this city.
(b) Whenever an incinerator becomes a public hazard or becomes unsafe or
is likely to cause fire to spread to neighboring properties or otherwise
endanger the public peace, health and safety of the citizens of the city,
then upon notice, the fire chief may prohibit the use of such incinerator.
Thereafter, it shall be unlawful to use or maintain the same within the
city.
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(c) Every incinerator shall be equipped and maintained with a spark
arrestor constructed of iron, heavy wire mesh, or other noncombustible
material, with openings not larger than one half inch.
SECTION 11.112. Article 11, Division I, of the Uniform Fire
Code, 1991 Edition is hereby amended to read as follows:
SECTION 11.112. Hours of Burning.
Burning of waste matter is prohibited except in an approved incinerator as
defined in Section 11.203.
Burning in approved incinerators as defined in Section
11.203(i) is subject to the rules and regulations of the Los
Angeles County Air Pollution Control District.
SECTION 11.301. Article 11, Division III, Subsection (b) of the
Unifrom Fire Code, 1991 Edition, is hereby amended to read as
follows:
SECTION 11.302. Accumulation of Rubbish and Vegetation.
(b) Storage within a building. Whenever it is necessary for`a person to
store or accumulate combustible or flammable rubbish or waste material
within any building, structure, or enclosure, then such material shall be
securely stored in metal or metal -lined receptacles or bins equipped with
tight -fitting covers or in rooms or vaults constructed of noncombustible
materials, with an approved heat actuated self-closing fire door and the
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
storage area shall be protected by an automatic sprinkler system on the
basis of one head per fifty (50) square feet or portion thereof.
SECTION 14.104(g) of Article 14, Group R., Division 1
Occupancies.
An automatic fire alarm system shall be installed in apartment houses
three or more stories in height (mezzanines and lofts shall be considered
as stories), or containing more than 15 dwelling units and in hotels three
or more stories in height or containing 20 or more guest rooms.
ARTICLE 31 of the Uniform Fire Code, 1991 Edition is hereby
amended to read as follows:
SECTION 31.107. Inside Tire Storage
Tires stored inside of buildings shall not block doors, windows, or
exitways. Piles and racks of tires which are placed directly against and
parallel to walls shall not extend out from said walls more than five (5)
feet. Piles or racks of tires placed in rows perpendicular to the walls
shall not exceed the (10) feet in width or fifty (50) feet in length. Every ..
row of tires shall be accessible on at least two (2) sides by an aisleway
at least three (3) feet in width.
Tires which are stored in such pattern as to form dead-end aisleways
against the walls of buildings shall terminate at an aisleway at least six
(6) feet wide at the inside end of such pile. Every rack or pile of tires
shall be kept at least eighteen (18) inches below sprinkler heads in a
sprinklered building. Piles of tires shall be maintained in such manner as
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
to ensure stability and not become a hazard by falling during a fire or
other emergency. Under no circumstances shall a pile or rack of tire
exceed twelve (12) feet in height unless approved by the fire chief.
SECTION 31.108. Outside Tire Storage.
Piles of tires or carcasses shall not exceed two thousand (2,000) cubic
feet in volume and shall be separated from every other pile by an aisleway
at least ten (10) feet in width. Under no circumstances shall a pile of
tires exceed twelve (12) feet in height unless approved by the fire chief.
SECTION 31.109. All Tire Storage.
It is the intent of this section that all tire storage, regardless of whether
such storage is in connection with a tire rebuilding plant, shall be made
to comply with sections 31.107 and 31.108.
Article 47 of the Uniform Fire Code, 1991 Edition is hereby
amended to read as follows:
SECTION 47.112. Pan Locks.
Whenever doors leading into the building or structure being fumigated
cannot be bolted or secured from the inside, pan locks shall be provided to
prohibit access into the building or structure to persons other than the
fumigator.
SECTION 47.113. Chloropicrin.
10
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
To discourage entrance into the building or structure being fumigated,
unless a watchman would otherwise be required, chloropicrin shall be
added to the fumigant at the rate of one ounce for each fifteen thousand
(15,000) cubic feet of space being fumigated.
SECTION 47.114. Fumigation Inspection.
The fire department shall make a visual inspection of all buildings or
other structures immediately prior to the release of the fumigant into the
building or structure, to determine whether the safety precautions
outlined in this section have been met.
SECTION 79.903(f) of Article 79, Division IX, of the Uniform
Fire Code, Entitled Special -Type -Dispensers, is hereby amended
to read as follows:
Approved special dispensing systems such as, but not limited to, coin
operated and remote preset types, are permitted at service stations
provided there is at least one qualified attendant on duty while the
station is open to the public.
(1) The attendant's primary duty shall be to supervise, observe and
control the dispensing of Class I Liquids into portable containers not in
compliance with Section 79.902(e) control sources of ignition, and
immediately to handle accidental spills and fire extingiushers, if needed.
(2) Emergency controls shall be installed at a location acceptable to the
Fire Department, but controls shall not be more than 100 feet from
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
dispensers. Instructions for the operation of dispensers shall be
conspicuously posted.
(3) Remote preset -type devices are to be in the "off" position while not in
use so that the dispenser cannot be activated without the knowledge of
the attendant.
(4) The dispensing device shall be in clear view of the attendant at all
times and no obstacle shall be placed between the dispensing devices and
the attendant.
(5) The attendant shall at all times be able to communicate with persons
in the dispensing area. -
APPENDIX III - A, Paragraph 5 Entitled Fire Flow Requirement
for Buildings is amended as follows:
(a) The minimum fire -flow requirements for one -and two-family
dwellings not exceeding two stories in height, shall be 1500 gallons per
minute (for other residential buildings, Table No. A -III -A-1 will be used).
Exception: Fire flow may be reduced 50 percent when the building is
provided with approved automatic sprinkler system.
The fire flow for buildings other than one -and two-family dwellings shall
be not less than that specified in Table No. A -III -A-1.
Exception: The required fire flow may be reduced up to 75 percent when
the building is provided with approved automatic sprinkler system, but in
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
no case less than 1500 gallons per minute.
In types I and II -FR Construction, only the three largest successive floor
areas shall be used.
Appendix III -B, Entitled Fire Hydrant Location and Distribution
is amended by adding a paragraph as follows:
(6) The Chief may require closer spacing between hydrants because of
grades, step inclines or other geographic problems, and accessibility.
SECTION 12-8. Modifications.
The fire chief or his designee shall have power to modify any of the
provisions of the Uniform Fire Code upon application in writing by the
owner or lessee, or his duly authorized agent, when there are practical
difficulties in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the code,
provided that the spirit of the code shall be observed, public safety
secured, and substantial justice done. The particulars of such
modification when granted or allowed and the decision of the fire chief or
his designee thereon shall be entered upon the records of . the department.
and a signed copy shall be furnished to the applicant.
SECTION 12-9. Appeals.
Whenever the chief of the fire department shall disapprove an application
or refuse to grant a permit applied for, or when it is claimed that the
provisions of the code do not apply or that the true intent and meaning of
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
the code have been misconstructed or wrongly interpreted, the applicant
may appeal from the decision of the chief of the fire department to the
city council within thirty (30) days from the date of the decision
appealed.
SECTION 12-10. New Materials, Processes or Occupancies which
may Require Permits.
The fire chief, the fire department plan check officer, and the director of
building and safety shall act as a committee to determine and specify
what new materials, processes or occupancies shall require permits, in
addition to those now enumerated in said code, after giving affected
persons reasonable opportunity to be heard. Their decision shall be final.
The fire chief shall post such list in a conspicuops place in his department
and distribute copies thereof to interested persons.
SECTION 12-11. Penalties.
(a) Any person violating any of the provisions of this code shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than
five hundred dollars ($500.00), or by imprisonment for a term not to
exceed six (6) months in the city or county jail, or by both such fine and
imprisonment. The imposition of one penalty for any violation shall not
excuse the violation or permit it to continue; all such persons shall be
required to correct or remedy such violations or defects within a
reasonable time; and when not otherwise specified, each ten (10) day that
prohibited conditions are maintained shall constitute a separate offense.
14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(b) The application of the above penalty shall not be held to prevent the
enforced removal of prohibited conditions.
SECTION 12-12. Repeal of Conflicting Ordinances.
All former ordinances or parts thereof conflicting or inconsistent with
the provisions of this chapter or of the Uniform Fire Code, 1991 Edition,
hereby adopted, are hereby repealed.
SECTION 12-13. Validity.
The City of Hermosa Beach hereby declares that should any section,
paragraph, sentence or word of this chapter or of the Uniform Fire Code,
1991 Edition, hereby adopted, be declared for any reason to be invalid, it
is the intent of the city that it would have passed all other portions of
this chapter independent of the elimination therefrom of any such portion
as may be declared invalid.
SECTION 12-14. Effective Date.
That this ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect
thirty days after date of adoption.
SECTION 12-15. Publication.
That the city council does hereby designate the city attorney to prepare a
summary of this ordinance to be published pursuant to Government Code
section 36933(c) (1) in lieu of the full text of said ordinance. That prior
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the
city clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a
weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the
City of Hermosa Beach.
SECTION 12-15.
That the city clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said
city; shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the
records of the proceedings of the city council at which the same is passed
and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
1992.
PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach,
California
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
16
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
c.y
June 1, 1992
City of Hermosa Beach
Mayor and Council
cluAn1 e 'Wiffiams
2065 �Man%attanvt
d{Ltma a _Stac%, C 4 9L254
At the Council meeting of May 26 Councilmember Weimans made remarks
concerning my property that were in error.
I wish to set the record straight.
In 1969, before submitting an offer to purchase my home, the first
thing I did was to check in the Hermosa Beach building dept. to
verify that the THREE units on the 40x45 lot with R-1 zoning were
legally constructed. The permits were on file showing construction
in 1932-33. That was well before the R-1 designation.
It was our intent to eventually remodel into a single family home
as many others have done with old units. Due to circumstances, I have
been unable to accomplish that goal, however, I have eliminated one
unit. Two units are now one without enlarging the structure. One
electric meter and one gas meter have been removed. My property has
not been devalued because of this voluntary "downzoning". I am not
aware of any property devaluation by the assessors office due to
downzoning. Even though I did not purchase my property as a speculator
I do believe good single family neighborhoods appreciate more in
value than multiple unit areas - which may be proven by checking
assessor's valuations.
If Mr. Weimans would study the code regarding rebuilding of non-
conforming uses he would learn that the code does apply to everyone,
myself included. In the case of gross destruction rebuilding must
conform to existing law.
It is appalling for a Councilmember to show such lack of knowledge
of zoning codes and broadcast incorrect information to the public.
Councilmembers owe it to the people they represent to check the facts
before expounding in public.
Please agendize this for "written communications"
4a
Council Meeting of May 26, 1992
Remarks of Councilmember Weimans
....when I ran for this body I did it on the basis of being
downzoned. I disagreed with the decision then...I disagree with
the decision now and let's make absolutely no mistake what's
going on here...this is a defacto down zoning...live with it..
let me go on a little further....when I ran I was being downzoned
and I complained bitterly to our then Mayor, Ms. Williams..uh..
the situation that I had.. I was in an R-2 zone... I had a 30x100
lot and I believed I was able to put 2 units in there...that's
what I had in mind but I was downzoned to R-1 and that was it..
and I asked Ms. Williams,"On what kind of lot atP you ? " She had
a 1 lot with two units on it. Now later, when Ms. Williams was
on this panel, the point came, " well, if anything should happen
to my home...it should burn down, can I rebuild the same thing ?.
and she needed to get reassurance that ..yes...she could do it...
well, look.. what wehave here is unfairness in the extreme, in
other words, look, if we are downzoning then let's downzone
everybody, in other words, if your property burns, then build
to whatever is the existing law then...now that is what we call
fairness. What we have here is the "haves" will continue to have
and those that "have not" will not get a dam thing...now this is
not fairness...this is, in my view, nothing short of theft... uh.
don't clap yet...the issue that we have here is one basic of
economics ..the property we are buying here cost a hell of a
lot of money and in order to get our money out of it we need to
put enough in the way of living space on it to make it worth our
while and these efforts of every time effecting property
rights, justdoesn't sit right..weought to listen to what people
out here are telling us and listen hard...the old days when we
could..uh .you know..quote..command..the silent majority are gone..
This majority is represented right here by the people that
speak against what we are doing
June 4, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council June 9, 1992
REVIEW OF ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR 2930 STRAND
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council allow the existing
approved encroachment permit to remain as approved.
Background:
The property owner requested to be allowed to use a small portion
of the public street right of way along 30th Street. The purpose
of the encroachment was to improve and beautify the area. The
request was similar but smaller in scale to the landscaped
improvements that had been approved by the City Council for the
other side of the walk street on January 24, 1984. It is the
staff's understanding that this new planter was agreed to by the
City a number of years ago in the settlement of a legal case with
this property owner.
Analysis:
The property owner at 2930 Strand applied for an encroachment
permit and the City agreement form was prepared April 2, 1992.
The permit was sent to the Interim City Manager for signature and
approval on April 7, 1992 (copy attached). The subject area is
the northerly 4.5 feet of 30th Street from the top of the stairs
to the east end of their patio wall. A distance of 72 feet.
The existing improvements are a new raised brick planter on the
west half of the 4.5 foot wide strip and a new brick walk surface
on the easterly half of the 4.5 foot wide strip. In addition,
the existing roof on the porch area overhangs the planter area by
5 inches. The new brick planter does not impede access to the
beach. The existing 16 foot wide concrete walkway that was
constructed by the City is the same width as the stairway and the
new brick planter lines up with the edge of the stairway. (See
attached drawings and photo's).
The property owner is in compliance with City code requirements
and the construction is an improvement to the area. Thus, the
Public Works staff recommends that the permit remain as approved.
However, there has been two complaints received at the City
Council level against this property recently (see attached
1
copies). A petition to remove the landscaped planter has been
submitted to the City Council for appeal (copy attached). The
staff has therefore placed this item on the City Council agenda
for City Council review.
Alternatives:
Other alternatives available to the City Council and considered
by staff are:
1.. Remove the existing landscaped planter.
2. Remove the existing landscaped planters on both sides of
30th Street.
3. Remove all encroachments from public lands along the
Strand and walkstreets.
Respectfully submitted,
Lynn A. Terry P.E .'
Deputy City Engineer
pworks/enc2930
Concur:
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager and Acting
Director of Public Works
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM
April 7, 1992
Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager
n _
Lynn Terry, Deputy City Engineer
2930 Strand
Encroachment Permit
The property owner at this address has applied for an
encroachment permit. The subject area is the northerly 4.5 feet
of 30th Street from the top of the stairs to the east end of
their patio wall. A distance of 72 feet.
The proposed improvements are a raised brick planter on the west
half of the 4.5 foot wide strip and a brick walk surface on the
easterly half of the 4.5 foot wide strip. In addition, the
existing roof on the porch area overhangs the planter area by 5
inches.
The property owner is in compliance
and the proposed construction would
area. Thus, the Public Works staff
approved. However, since there has
Council level against this property
requesting guidance from your office
Lynn Terry
Deputy City Engineer
ty/itep
with City Code requirements
be an improvement to the
recommends that the permit be
been a complaint at the City
in the recent past, I an
WHEN RECORDED RETURN T'0:
City Clerk
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER
.RESIDENTIAL ENCROACHMENT -PERMIT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into at
California, this 2 nd day of
April
between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal
County of Los Angeles, State of California,
the "CITY", and:
Frank L. Fouce. and Betty L. Fouce
Hermosa Beach,
19 _22, by and
corporation in the
hereinafter called
hereinafter called "OWNER" which parties do agree as follows:
SECTION 1. OWNER represents that they are the owner in fee
of real property located at Hermosa Beach, legally described as:
South 1/2 of Lot 37 and all of Lot 38,Block 1 of Shakespeare Tract)As per Map Recorded
in Book8and
n of posnCounty Z. The artitsfurther agree that an encroachment
permit application was presented to the Public Works Department
of the CITY for permission to encroach in and over a portion of:
The Westerly 72 Feet of The Eas+or,,, 92 of T, Northerly 4.5 of 30th. StreetInext to
-
2930 Strand.
With improvements consisting of the following:
(1) PaiSPd 3rirk -
osed sand
Area. Maximum Total Height of Plants Plus Planter Limited To 36 inches. Maximum Width of
P1antpr LimitPr1 Tri Northerly 4.5 FPPt witht Puhl it Right of way (2) 3rick '111 k Flush
with Street Grade on 47% of Area to provide Access to House and to the open space.
(3) Rnnf nvPrhansinr3 at `nrrh ArPA of 5 inching
That a sketch of the proposed improvement and encroachment is on
file in the Public Works Department of the CITY and is by
1
. 1
. . .
reference
permit is
requested.
incorporated herein and made a part hereof; and that
hereby granted for that certain encroachment herein
SECTION 3. In consideration of the permission granted by
the CITY to permit the improvements hereinabove described in SEC-
TION 2, in, upon, or over public right-of-way, the OWNER covenant
and agree to the following:
a. OWNER shall permit the CITY, its officers, employees and
agents to enter upon said real property at any and every
place therein for the purpose of repair, maintenance, or
replacement of the facilities or properties on or in said
public right-of-way, hereby waiving any and all claims for
damages or liability in connection therewith for property
damages incurred;
b. OWNER shall reimburse the CITY for any damages caused to
CITY -owned facilities by construction or maintenance of the
encroachment over said public right-of-way by the OWNER,
their heirs, successors or assigns;
c. OWNER shall
remove
the
encroachment at their own expense
upon thirty (30) days written
OWNER, their heirs, successors
the opinion of the CITY, the
notice
by
the CITY, to the
or assigns, in the
event, in
public right-of-way becomes
necessary for a municipal purpose. Should any cost be in-
curred by the CITY in the removal of the encroachment, such
cost shall be a lien upon subject property.
d. OWNER shall hold and save the CITY harmless from any action
at law whatsoever or at all or from any claim or damage by
reason of the maintenance of the encroachment over the
right-of-way owned by the CITY.
2
e. This permit is issued to the OWNER only as legal owner of
the real property hereinabove described in SECTION 1 of this
agreement, which is the herein described contiguous parcel.
f. OWNER shall perform all work-in accordance with CITY policy,
standard specifications, and ordinances.
g. OWNER recognizes and understands that this permit may create
a possessory interest subject to property taxation and, fur-
ther,`OWNER agrees to make payment of any property taxes
levied on such interest.
h. OWNER shall be responsible for and maintain said encroach-
ment including all associated costs.
i. OWNER recognizes and understands that this permit is revok-
able upon demolition of the property.
j
Residential Properties: Upon sale of the
encroachment permit shall not succeed to
cept upon
upon said new owner's application.
above parcel, this
the new owner ex -
review by the CITY and reissuance to the new owner
The Residential Building
Report prepared on the property will
indicate
that an en-
croachment permit is in force and instruct the OWNER to take
steps to have the new owner apply for an encroachment permit
or it must be abated within fifteen (15) days. In the event
that the new owner does not apply for an encroachment permit
for the continued use of the hereindescribed land as condi-
tioned by this permit, the undersigned OWNER shall restore
the land described herein within fifteen (15) days of recor-
dation of the sale.
SECTION 4. The OWNER further agrees to insure the CITY
against all risks of loss by reason of construction or main-
tenance of the encroachment by (1) naming the CITY as an addi-
tional insured on the OWNER's public liability and property
damage insurance policy carrying a combined single limit coverage
3
of $500,000 against any injury, death or loss arising out of the
encroachment, (2) filing the "City of Hermosa Beach Encroachment
Endorsement" duly executed by the OWNER'S insurance carrier, and
(3) further agreeing that failure to maintain such insurance
policy shall be grounds for cancellation of this permit. Such
insurance is primary for any losses and neither the CITY nor
their insurers shall be required to contribute to any such loss.
SECTION 5. This agreement shall be recorded in the Office
of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, State of California.
CITY OF HERMOSA :EACH
gcT1,4G Director of u•lic Works
,-,14- aSe-a.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
�J� U
Owner
ii1 L, FovCF
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ity Attorney
-tz-QF
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF LOS MULES)
On thi the _ day of ///'/C ,19?, before me,
aelC/Ge. /if . Dv,(/e- /, the undersigned Notary Public
personally appeared S1/2Five 4 ,,5Mie4J ,K / , personally
known to me to be thefDirector of Public Works of the City of
Hermosa Beach and known to me to be the person who executed
within instrument on behalf of the City of Hermosa Beach and
acknowledged to me that such City of Hermosa Beach executed the
same. Acri^49
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
ary's Signature
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)
-4-
¢ OFFICIAL SEAL
LAURICE M. DUKE
Notary Public • California
PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN
L A. COUNTY
or comm. Exp Mar. 12, 1993
(SEAL)
On this the a3/1,:A , day ofL\4�! , 19 9/ , before.
me, d ,_ the undersigned Notary Public
personally appeared (T/ta„,,,6 ,2,,.,,,r
O personally known to me y �. ►
R proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s)
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that
)64 executed it.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Nota 's gnature
- 5-
PHYLL tS 1. ROETHER
Notary Public -State of Nevada
CLARK COUNTY
My Appointment Expires Aug. 9. 1993
(SEAL)
.
• CITY OF'HERMOSA BEACH
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT ENDORSEMENT
To be attached to and made a part.of all policies insuring the
liability of any person, firm, or corporation subject to
regulations by the City Council because of the existence of an
encroachment.
Notwithstanding any inconsistent expression in the policy to
which this endorsement is attached; or in any other endorsement
now Or hereafter attached thereto, or made a part thereof, the
protection afforded by said policy shall:
1. Inolude the City of Hermosa Beach as an additional insured.
(To include. the elected officials, appointed officials and
.employees). For the risks covered by this endorsement, this
insurance will provide primary insurance to the City to the
exclusion of any other insurance or self-insurance program
the City may carry with respect to claims and injuries
arising out of activities of the insured hereunder.
2. Indemnify and save harmless the City of Hermosa Beach
against any and all claims which result from the existence
of any encroachment existing as the result of the Named
Insured's operations or. activities. This hold harmless
assumption on the part of the underwriters shall include all
costs of investigation and defense.
3. Not be cancelled except by notice _to the City Attorney of
the City of Hermosa Beach at least thirty (30) days prior to
the date of su"Ch cancellation.
4. Provide the designated limits of liability combined single
limit coverage against any injury, death, loss or damage
arising out of the encroachment as follows:
[XXL Residential $ 500,000
E J Commercial $1,000,000
The limits of liability as stated above apply to the insurance
afforded by this endorsement notwithstanding that the policyma
have lower limits of liability applying elsewhere in the y
policy.
'Attached to and forming part of
Policy No. 024186179
of the ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Date: 11/77/01
Expiration Date:
11/27/93
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
•..
/.•
----Duly Authorized Agent
Agency : ALLSTATE INSURANCE
11607 WASHIN(,'IOn PLAUE
CITY ATTORNEY
1.1
A
Nane Address Phone
•10.•
•0
_: = ide Assoc. Inc. TEL 14->32-5343
Jun
• Lakeside Assoc. Inc. TEL Jun 12,91 10:41 No.001 P.05
6' THICK fSgr.r. \vALL.
•br-e. PETA IL- A
ELEN4A:TIGN4 (50111- PLACE:)
Lakeside Assoc. Inc . TEL:714-832-5.343
... •
Jun 12,1 10:41 No.001 F.04
F.A\T EL_EvA,710
4
.f_me.TFik.t.x.iperNos -rorieNToSA
1.5 &CJ
_21_7 ..bANToLin4A cmAriAccyrAFt.isSU6
I t.A.s./E.Npa_fc co-r7oN
FIAT j rts-wcA
00.0.1 rc)bcuE
Fl-btcrituM
56E-4 icALAND
MLLPHILA
—24"itcX1 pi NW, PirTATZTJCA.
re_j_Er-ONI6rc! t41 -IS c;,PF1(
IC 1isf.)6E-MARI- •
fro ps flante\-
21 gosm*KIKiti5 oF.ElCdNA.LIS
1 &(,A -17F
TEA
_15 LI-AYA4‘10.1-11-A PMT/1.
1C,C1 rISZNC.14 i-A"/I'C2C,IS
ffLAN
11EPI-11,441C. PCor1a41.:
art3,..:•0 viaJR: C,Riv(re.
c qcx-5
(M)5510- ,?54 5
-
roUCZ PENCE.
eci -5c) THE, STF,ANP
HE.KmosA. Fst.Aci-t, GAL' r
a
1
11
CV
I
(r)
1
It•
I
14)
1
d_OL, -)C l p --,o; r41.,Ft1.3+ y(;AR
..t1;:"...52, reCG�.5-fr&4c•�(Uti ('�S %P;-- CCCceir cry cA
V,C% (c.c_c' eS C
I�=`e (,�. bort ��.L PAc c �Kir�c It �e �C-�''�ti C (/t2_.
TT -c -ti cjicX=z- U. Sc p r M L . a 1 -KL'• .v L t Ctddl! -(Gr- -{- k e t 1
PiZCZCI-1-( V e ln. CC 16'S/ / k- 5.1-eG 1 -{-1 uZ►(. r�Lr �c c> ti -+-/A beaC C,
Ci CC2 (\..R i t. `: a Nc:..$ �cc , 0.47
/C�Gr..: -� cZC(e 5 ccif� /--1-tt ltvt.k_ �CC.L�SC--{-{`.2 (cce. ( Fl.k ie
c4 b''Qct - C' + -4--1.,,r LA., \Y,sQ/-1/ /1Ce ,
rc c 7f(2C- f' )c L .7t)/ C—f-)/l!C-7 rk
rcG.<_c� , -i-; .b ei.1 =,c• /c i S �G c,.� r'S e.7,47.--6;_.-711,7,
-flirt)--1-1....,c_ 6-,. �',• f- h;Cyl, �Gt4� -�,zv I ve 6c+ is 't :rt -15._+,-.15
i 11.1 1.( �z t �zZc/. ,,Hcxir' ,,\):5.4..t&_ -„d -i- ..0A -e_ /;16rr
6,..,1-,c, (S (11 I k ter. -4-(,„1 ..\\C J -{c'.r- �c:D .�E'c Lc.r.1-{-t1. TA t e ctl e 1.X*)
Si.:b Car rt"nc+0r'S�,
C�:�:c�'Y S,N:,�C SGC L ^��1I J SLtCv1 4tS �cb,Nzl> e -4-c, ,I�c 'az;�.
r/.1.. i.` r, G` h.Ce IL. f( ` .r ,r C-:.(.�.. 1- �%i.cl c2C �(Ct 1 ' coai3‹. .L..,_
,+_ 5 do..�2 c',`. Ter �t rL. et a h•30,--!1 ovc)1}:c-i, /I --�v &4.71-:_.'5.1 't
. S rdo c.�. ci', p rC.:j-(C,-i Us, �ec,,uX. --i-kaki _� 44 tT
•� i «% r+ r:' -'a L I't cal rYXt- ) k'/ -fiche cjec:: 4 cc i 1. c_ ` t y 1 _J�� I1
C..-._ ..uC•i til g6A•r'...).t-ti {'771 �1J .."i.
The.rnknre_ 7C-' G- c .� • ..-1 t
eE,i12:2,1 -4-tic :5 be -fes? N v�' ti,wee•-
fiGAJ ct�7 tfi2 lYj({�. f0, lc/Q_.•l��r~)‘3.
g_ear 6-zpuci7: 6A.J. 6/c40:.)E
Zq.?O ,S- t t t 1? 7S he cofv5fruc714
Zlz. 64 CJC'C' S we . 1 N'I Cosxe ,Q
4-G �:L(�' l S a ,�; er ���G p-ock7c '--1O r-.S-ed4r
-e/—C1rC c \ 1410,E'� �])/1,� 01- 74/0A.)
1--) tvi- f - JLQ 411e? -45
/�1 (s ae;kl� 4� %%n l '/76-79214/
GNL"1t1Src,�0 TG1 QC(? -554/S
�e,
c(v'f2N>14�, i.+- c-cpp- r5-)l�NeistA it •(o+ /
n.(o �NUo4cG��Q10,4.b proper -{-1/
a+`' ' (S R /:$o h.&U,$l -eXCiusfei'y as ,ori k- ,,.r
ccs a. pc,- -{/��
p� c, kI N -D J _ �-lGt �� �-G..� �/, �s �r . P'��J
'
/
Petitin to the City Council of Hermosa • each to stop the
erc,_:r oacl„netit_ on our right-of-way at 30th Street and Strand.
.
10 THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA:
We the undersigned, being residents of the city of Hermosa
;teach, hereby present this petition and request that the
the erieroactimerit on the north side of the beach access at 30th
Street. and Strand. in Hermosa Beach be denied. and that the area
be sidewalk for fft1.1 to u4,e.
NrnA
Signa
/e -ft
- '--( l .
OARR /L ;
� ��'....
l 1/1.6
i I
DECLARATION OF Cl RCU;_ ATOR :
Hernias_u I-ieach. I circul
signatures being written.
obtained between __---
goirly is true and correct.
CG"L.•.,L:y'
,I,
Address
«/3 a2
S7 S7L
r 33
;137 29 til,
s3' �'z* C' -
Ho 3ott2
1f0
r 35� .3e.)-°5•
Year:
resident
;336,, 77fT/ i./'
:1424144x1
;i
;1(,; /'s
I am a registered voter of the City of
ated this petition and saw the appended
All signatures to the document were
and__ . I declare that the fore
"62/24,4=4:4-5,4J
LOOKING NORTHWEST AT 2930 THE STRAND
LOOKING WEST ALONG 30TH STREET
(SHOWING EXISTING CITY INSTALLED 10 FT. WIDE WALKWAY)
LOOKING WEST ALONG 30TH STREET
(SHOWING EXISTING CITY INSTALLED 10 FT. WIDE WALKWAY)
2
LOOKING WEST SHOWING EXISTING 10 FT. WALKWAY ABOVE EXISTING STAIRS
LOOKING EAST AT EXISTING 10 FT. WIDE STAIRS
3
LOOKING NORTHEAST AT NEW PLANTER
LOOKING NORTHEAST AT NEW PLANTER
4
LOOKING NORTHEAST AT REFINISHED EXISTING WALL & NEW BRICK WALK AREA
(PUBLIC STREET RIGHT OF WAY LINE IS 11 INCHES OUT FROM FACE OF WALL)
LOOKING NORTHWEST AT REFINISHED EXISTING WALL & NEW BRICK WALK AREA
(PUBLIC STREET RIGHT OF WAY LINE IS 11 INCHES OUT FROM FACE OF WALL)
0
LOOKING SOUTHWEST
a �
s-`," \ �1%%t U
/ / / / 1 1 I I
\ \'\,.11 �\ \
-��;••�4ae.��eeet�
l//IIIIII\oI9G
\\\\\\NAAAIIII\AAAA
Honorable Mayor and Members of
the Hermosa Beach City Council
6t � C
June 4, 1992
Regular Meeting of
June 9, 1992
REPORT ON SURVEYING DISCREPANCIES AND EXISTING PROCEDURE FOR
PROTECTING SURVEY MONUMENTS ALONG MONTEREY BOULEVARD AND BAY VIEW
DRIVE BETWEEN 16TH AND 19TH STREETS
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council:
Receive and file this report.
Background:
This item was originally submitted to the City
24, 1992 (a copy of that report is attached).
to continue this item until after the effected
able to meet with staff.
Council on March
A request was made
property owner was
Analysis:
On May 27, 1992, the property owner met with the new City Manager
and staff to review the situation that had occurred. The
property owner's concern was addressed and she was satisfied with
the approach that the staff was proposing. She also indicated her
support for the future CIP project to improve the land surveying
monumentation throughout the City. A copy of her letter dated
June 1, 1992 is attached.
The new CIP project, if approved and funded for the 1992-93
fiscal year, will provide as Phase I for a field review of
existing survey monumentation city wide. This will include the
protection of those monuments where needed, such as the survey
monuments referred to by Miss Roberts. As Phase II of the CIP, a
network of elevation control points will be established. Phase
III will include establishing a survey control network that will
tie all of the survey monuments together city wide.
Respectfully submitted,
;2
Lynn Terry
Deputy City Engineer
ty/bayview
Concur:
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager
a
LAUREL LEE ROBERTS, PH.D.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
POST OFFICE BOX 524
HERMOSA BEACH. CALIFORNIA 90254
TELEPHONE (3101 372-4480
Mr. Rick Ferrin, City Manager
Office of the City Manager
City of Hemrosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive - Civic Center
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
Re: Capital Outlay Project on Surveying
Dear Mr. Ferrin,
RECEIVED
JUN 3 199
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
1 June 1992
I am pleased that we had the opportunity on 27 May 1992, to discuss the
surveying issues facing the City of Hermosa Beach.
I am in agreement with the approaches that you propose regarding the survey
monuments'of specific concern to me and I support the citywide project as
presented by Mr: Lynn Terry.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
LLR:ms
cc: Ms. Midstokke
Mr. Grove
Mr. Terry;/
Sincerely,
If41/41A6A)
Laurel. Lee Roberts, Ph.D.
Attorney at Law
March 10, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council March 24, 1992
REPORT ON SURVEYING DISCREPANCIES AND EXISTING PROCEDURE FOR
PROTECTING SURVEY MONUMENTS ALONG MONTEREY BOULEVARD AND
BAY VIEW DRIVE BETWEEN 16TH AND 19TH STREETS
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City council:
Receive and file this report.
Background:
The engineering staff of the Public Works Department became aware
of surveying discrepancies in this area of the City, during the
last half of 1989. In early 1990, the staff was informed of the
developing survey problem referenced in the comments from the
Mayor at the August 13, 1991, City Council meeting (copy of
comments attached).
It was recommended by the engineering staff in early 1990, to
both the Director of Public Works and to the Building Department,
that no building permit should be issued for 1702 Bay View Drive
until after a Record of Survey Map was reviewed and approved by
the County Surveyor. Under state law, the County Surveyor is the
only person that can approve a Record of Survey Map.
The recommendation was two fold. First, the location of new
property corners encroaching over two (2) feet onto the adjacent
neighbor's property at 1656 Bay View Drive (in order to build a
new house on the property at 1702 Bay View Drive) needed to be
reviewed at the highest surveying level. Second, the City does
not have a program at this time to check surveys at the City
staff level.
The neighbor at 1656 Bay View Drive, whose property was
encroached upon, was informed by the engineering staff that the
only sure way of protecting her interest was to have a Record of
Survey Map recorded. The neighbor's concern was stated in her
letter of June 5, 1990 (copy attached). The affected neighbor
hired a second surveyor who, in fact, did record a Record of
Survey Map in 1991. The City received a letter dated May 7,
1991, from the affected neighbor stating that the City was to be
advised that the boundary line dispute had been resolved by the
property owners (copy attached).
li
Analysis:
The City does not have a program to control surveys within the
City limits. During the 1989-90 fiscal year, the engineering
staff became aware of four (4) "private property surveys" with
errors of one property overlapping onto the adjacent property
from 2.0 to 3.5 feet. This should not happen and needs to be
controlled by the City. The last time that a City-wide control
survey took place in this City was by the W.P.A., over 50 years
ago, between the years of 1934 and 1938.
At the present time, the Building Department requires a "private
property survey" to be done for most building projects in the
City. These surveys are acceptable for building permits as long
as the four corners of the property are tagged. This is so the
building inspector has a point to measure from in the field.
While the "private property survey" meets the needs of the
Building Department, these surveys do not meet the standards that
are required by state surveying laws. The engineering staff in
reviewing these "private property survey" documents has found
that the background survey information, original control
monuments, basis of bearings, survey bearings and methods of
survey are missing. The problem is compounded because the City
does not have any surveying standards. The proposed ordinance
being reviewed by the new Director of Public Works at this time
should resolve this situation.
The Director of Public Works/City Engineer should have land
surveying experience and a license prior to 1982. This allows
him, under state law, to review and approve property surveys,
Final Tract Maps and Final Parcel Maps on behalf of the City.
The past Director of Public Works/City Engineer did not have the
required license or land surveying experience. The new Director
of Public Works has the proper license and has been responsible
for the approval of final maps. At the present time, all the
final maps are checked by the County before they are recorded.
The City engineering staff does not approve, or even get to
review, the final maps before the maps are recorded. The City
policy on this situation should be changed.
As an example, the surveyor for the property owner at 1656 Bay
View Drive had the map checked by the County. The surveyor did
not provide a copy of the map for review to the engineering staff
of the Public Works Department. The property owner provided some
survey information to the Building Department, but later
requested that information to be returned to her. When the
survey information was returned, the Building Department
recommended that the survey information should be provided to the
Public Works Department (see attached letter dated May 15, 1991).
However, at the present time there is no requirement in the City
Code that requires survey information to be provided to the
Public Works Department. As of this date, the engineering staff
has not received from the surveyor any of the field survey
information. _.
In addition, the engineering staff does not receive a mylar copy
of any recorded map to include in the City's permanent
engineering files. A count has been made within the last six (6)
months and of 400 maps recorded with the County, that show City
survey information, over 300 maps are not available in the City's
permanent files. The engineering staff recommends that this
situation be corrected by CIP 92-178. This CIP is proposed to
begin in FY 1992-93.
The City should have a program to control surveys within the City
limits. A proposed new city ordinance for property surveys
within the City has been prepared by the city engineering staff.
The proposed ordinance is being reviewed by the new Director of
Public Works and will be submitted for City Council review and
approval in the near future.
The Public Works Department engineering staff should review all
surveys and final maps within the City of Hermosa Beach. This
new policy would provide for local control and an improvement in
the quality of the surveys presently taking place in this City.
The new Director of Public Works has a California Civil Engineer
license issued in 1980 and has experience with final maps. The
Deputy City Engineer has a California Civil Engineer license
issued in 1970, has experience with final maps and has been doing
land surveying as a consultant since 1976. This experience
should be used to benefit the citizens within the City of Hermosa
Beach.
The protection of existing found survey monuments, when used in a
survey, is the responsibility of the surveyor. The City staff
has not been involved with protecting the recently discovered old
survey monuments found by the second surveyor because; (1) the
city engineering staff is not aware of where the monuments are
located, (2) the city engineering staff has not received any
survey information in order to locate the monuments, (3) the City
should be requiring the private surveyor to protect the found old
monuments and (4) the City has not approved any funding for this
type of activity until the 1992-93 Fiscal Year (see attached
budget sheets for CIP 92-178). In the County, when a surveyor is
doing a survey to subdivide land in the unincorporated areas, the
County charges an inspection fee of $150 for each survey monument
that the surveyor sets or uses in the field. The survey
monuments are then checked by engineering personnel. At this
time, in the City there is no inspection of control monuments for
surveys by the City engineering staff and no City fees are
collected. The engineering staff recommends that the situation
relating to survey monuments be corrected. That corrective
action is included within the proposed new City ordinance for
property surveys. The proposed ordinance is being reviewed by
the new Director of Public Works at this time and will be
submitted to the City Council in the near future. If the funds
for CIP 92-178 are approved for the coming 1992-93 Fiscal Year,
then the engineering staff can take action to begin improvement
of the City's survey monuments. It is estimated that this
program will take at least five years.
Summary:
The City at this time does not have a program to review and check
property surveys, Final Tract Maps or Final Parcel Maps by the
city engineering staff. For the City to provide this service the
present City policy needs to be changed. The engineering staff
has prepared a proposed City Ordinance for property surveys
within the City to be submitted to the City Council which
addresses the City's needs.
Respectfully Submitted,
Lynn Terry P.E.
Deputy City Engineer
Director of Public Works
Steve Wisniewski
Interim City Manager
Attachments: 1. Copy of Mayor's comments at the August 13, 1991,
City Council meeting.
2. Copy of a letter from a local attorney regarding
problems, dated June 5, 1990.
3. Copy of a letter from a local attorney advising
that the boundary line dispute had been resolved,
dated May 7, 1991.
4. Copy of a letter from the Building Department
returning survey information to a property
owner, dated May 15, 1991.
5. Copy of proposed CIP 92-178 budget approved by
the the City Council in 1990.
pworks/montbay
CITY COUNCIL MEETING 8-13-91
16(d) Request by Mayor Midstokke regarding surveying discrepancies 16 th
19th Streets from Monterey Blvd. to Bayview Drive.
It was recently brought to my attention by some Homeowners in this area
that there is substantial evidence that the position of 16th Street was
incorrectly re-established in 1957 by the Denn Company, hired by the City.
The result of this inconsistency is that said block has a North/South
misclosure to two feet. The problem for this particular homeowner was
resolving by spending several thousand dollars on a Record of Survey and
this has been recorded -and does reflect the proper, pre 1957 survey. This
survey recovered and used a very old brass rod centerline monument to
establish this curve terminus.
While this homeowner has worked with the Public Works Department and
the City Manager, they feel that nothing has really been done as a result of
this inaccuracy being brought to their attention. Since that had their
survey of record recorded, already one developer has used it and thanked
them for saving them several thousands of dollars on surveying costs.
I would request that the Council request staff for a report regarding this
subject and what, if any, thing this recommend be done now that this has
been brought to our attention. The recently discovered old monuments
must be preserved in some way similar to the way the City of Los Angeles
does (i.e. a protective devise with a screw cap on it.) This way, they can not
be "lost" when things such as slurry sealing are done.
Thank you for your consideration of this item.
Kathleen Midstokke
I
LAUREL LEE ROBERTS, PH.D.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
POST OFFICE BOX 594.
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254
TELEPHONE (213) 372-44.80
Mr. Kevin Northcraft, City Manager
Hermosa Beach City Hall
1315 Valley Drive - Civic Center
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
Re: Surveying Problem
Dear Mr. Northcraft,
5 June 1990
RECttvEY
JUN 0 61990
This is to follow-up on our meeting of April 26, 1990, regarding the surveying
problems in Hermosa Beach and specifically the situation between 1656 and 1702
Bayview Drive.
As you recall, you were going to ask city staff to take a proactive stance in
this matter by initiating communications with Mr. Clark Kugler. The goal was to
have city staff help Mr. Kugler find a way to prepare the required Record of
Survey in conformance with past occupation of the properties in the area and
with the 1928 markers on the 1656 Bayview Drive property; thus resulting in a
win-win situation for all parties. I am interested to know whether your negotia-
tions have been successful in this regard?
For your information, I have been in communication with the State Board regarding
this matter and they concur that any effort to dialog at this point should be taken
*given the seriousness of the alternative approaches. According to State authorities,
Mr. Kugler can file his Record of Survey in conformance with the•1928 survey markers
if he feels he should do so. Again this is why the role of city staff is so crucial
in any dialog so that the advantages to all parties, including his client, become
clear to him.
Equally significant, however, is the fact that Mr. Kugler and other surveyors use
the "centerline" of streets as the basis of their surveys today. This focus is
determined by the descriptions provided by the city. According to State Board
staff, these centerlines did not exist when the land was originally divided; there-
fore they may not have any legal relevance today. Given this information, I think
you can see the potential ramifications of this particular dispute and the inevit-
able responsibility to redevelop the entire subdivision.
All this leads me to the other aspect of our conversation, i.e. my offer to assist
in bringing this matter before the council to secure adequate support for a major •
Continued - Page Two 6/5/90
Dr. Roberts to Mr. Northcraft
Re: Survey Conflict
surveying project throughout this city; thus avoiding this type of problem
in the future for other home owners. I thought that I would simply write a
letter detailing the need and requesting the allocation of funds. Thereafter
I would meet with some or all of the council to attempt to have the project
identified as a high priority matter. I need your advice, however, as to the
most effective approach and the suggested timing. Please be frank in comment-
ing on how you would like this item handled.
Please feel free to give me a call at your convenience to discuss the above
referenced request and and the city negotiations with Mr. Kugler. I look
forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
LDAYIJ (N -(1,0C
Laurel Lee Roberts, Ph.D.
Attorney at Law
LLR:ms
cc: Mr. William Grove
Mr. Lynn Terry
LAUREL LEE ROBERTS, PH.D.
Mr. Kevin Northcraft, Manager
Office of the City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive - Civic Center
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
_Attorney af= aw
239 PIER AVENUE / POST OFFICE BOX 594
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254
TELEPHONE (213) 372-4480
Re: RECORD -OF -SURVEY RECORDED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Dear Mr. Northcraft,
7 May 1991
This is to advise you and your staff that the boundary line dispute involving 1656
and 1702 Bayview Drive, Hermosa Beach has been resolved by the property owners, who
submit herewith two copies of the followingdocuments for the permanent city files:
(1) Record of Survey showing the boundaries of both Lots 39 and 38 approved by the
Los Angeles County Department of Public Works - Surveying Department and recorded
on 24 April 1991;
(2) Certified Boundary Line Agreement recorded in Los Angeles County on 15 April 1991;
(3) Survey Map of Lot 38 reflecting the Boundary Line Agreement.
I request that you remove from the Building Department file on 1702 Bayview Drive the
preliminary Record of Survey which was submitted to you earlier. Please return that
document to me. The enclosed Record of Survey contains significant changes and addit-
ions which the property owners agree should be the basis of your records in this area
and which they submit to yow in consort. Since the boundary line issue is resolved,
the owners of 1656 Bayview Drive have no objection to the development of the adjacent
property within city guidelines.
cc: Mr. Daryle Marjaniemi, Property Owner
Mr. William Grove, Director -Building
Mr. Lynn Terry, Surveyor -Public Works
Col:and Mrs. A.H. Roberts, Property Owners
Sincerely,
Laurel Lee Roberts, Ph.D.
Attorney at Law
Laurel Lee Roberts
239 Pier Avenue
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
City of 21ermosaTeaclt_)
Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254.3885
May 15, 1991
Re: Record of Survey for Lot 39, Tract 1130
Dear Ms. Roberts,
As you requested in your letter dated May 7, 1991 to City Manager
Northcraft, I am returning the Record of Survey you had submitted
on January 2, 1991.
A copy of the material you submitted will be added to our
property files for 1656 Bayview and 1702 Bayview Drive.
It would also be helpful if you would submit a copy to the Public
Works Department for inclusion in their private property file.
Yours Truly,
William Grove
Director,
Dept. of Bldg. & Safety
CITY OF HHERMOSA BEACH
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 90-91 THROUGH FY 94-95
PROGRAM AREA: Street and Safety Improvements
PROJECT NUMBER CIP 92-178
& NAME: City Wide Street Centerline Monuments and Elevation
ACCOUNT NUMBER: 305-401-8178-4201
PROJECT LOCATION & DESCRIPTION:
This project proposes to:
1. establish survey control points at every street intersection City-wide.
2. establish a network of elevation control points called "Bench Marks" throughout the
City.
PROJECT BACKGROUND & STATUS:
New project. The State of California has mandated that the major survey control monuments
throughout the State be tied into the Statewide California coordinate system by 1995. Los
Angeles County has started in the unincorporated areas of the County and Orange County has
already completed their preliminary network.
The last time that a City-wide control survey took place was by the W.P.A. between the
years of 1934 and 1938. The accuracy of today's survey equipment is 10 times better then
what was used during that last control survey over 50 years ago. In the last year, there
have been 4 private property surveys with errors of one property overlaping onto the
adjacent property from 2.0 to 3.5 feet.
SCHEDULED FISCAL YEAR START:
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:
CITY MANAGER COMMENT:
CITY COUNCIL COMMENT:
CIP/c"pcent
R /)1 •?ri
FY;91-92
FY 90-91 $-0-
Explore in-house design and survey crew to reduce costs,
improve speed and update record maps and centerline ties.
Check to see if City needs to be in compliance with
1995 mandate and availability of any SB90 reimbursement.
CIP 92-178 CITY WIDE STREET CENTERLINE MONUMENTS AND ELEVATIONS
EXPENDITURES
FUNDING SOURCES
ESTIMATED FUTURE WEEDS
FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95
ESTIMATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
55,000 48,000 48,000
17,000
4,000 400 400
151,000
17,000
4,800
0
0
76,000
48,400 48,400
172,800
0
$76,000 148,400 $48,400
$172,800
001
115
GENERAL FUND0
STATE GAS TAX FIND
PROJECT ELEMENTS
EXPENDED
PRION TO
FY89-90
BUDGET
FY89-90
EXPENDED
TNRU
2/28/90
ESTIMATED
EXPENDED
6/30/90
ESTIMATED
BALANCE.
6/30/90
BUDGET
FY90-91
BUDGET
FY91-92
FIELD SURVEY
EQUIPMENT
BLUEPRINTING
TOTAL FUNDING
TOTAL UNFUNDED
SO
SO
$0
0
0
0
0
0
SO
SO
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
10
10
10
10
SO
SO
SO
FUNDING SOURCES
ESTIMATED FUTURE WEEDS
FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95
ESTIMATED
PROJECT
TOTAL
55,000 48,000 48,000
17,000
4,000 400 400
151,000
17,000
4,800
0
0
76,000
48,400 48,400
172,800
0
$76,000 148,400 $48,400
$172,800
001
115
GENERAL FUND0
STATE GAS TAX FIND
0
0
38,000
38,000
24,200
24,200
24,200
24,200
86,400
86,400
0
TOTAL FUNDING
TOTAL UNFUNDED
SO
SO
$0
10
SO
SO
SO
$76,000
148,400
148,400
1172,800
69
LAUREL LEE ROBERTS,' PH.D.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
POST OFFICE BOX 594
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254
TELEPHONE 1310) 372-44-80
Mr. F.Ferrin, City Manager
Office of the City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive - Civic Center
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
Re: Project #CIP 92-178
Dear Mr. Ferrin,
RECEIVED
APR 2 8 1992
CITY MGR. OFFICE
27 April 1992
This is to comment on Project #CIP 92-178 and to provide you with a different
perspective on the development of the proposed item. The report as issued
seems to reflect (1) a lack of inter -departmental communication and cooperation
in the city and (2) a lack of responsiveness by the city to property owners and
to elected officials. There are many relevant facts missing from the report at
this time.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The owners of 1656 Bayview Drive, Hermosa Beach were in possession of a 1928
survey of their property completed by C.W.Cook, Inc. of Los Angeles. On that
survey and still physically present are two of the four iron markers indicating
the corner boundary lines. In conformance with this record, improvements were
made to the property over the years in the form of walkways, fences, and walls.
The adjacent property, 1702 Bayview Drive, was sold about two years ago. The new
owner employed Clark Kugler Company to conduct a land survey and as a result,
markers were placed that encroached two feet into the property at 1656 Bayview
Drive. The discrepancy was called to the attention of the Public Works Depart-
ment and to the Office of the City Manager. In fact, Mr. Northcraft and Mr.
Terry came to my office on several occasions to discuss the matter and staff
and council members visited the site to examine the problem itself. Unfortunate-
ly the city's position seemed only to be one of sympathy as they deliberately
elected not to get involved, stating that the problem was only between two pro-
perty owners. In this case, no action was taken or promised by the city.
In contrast, the Supervising County Surveyor and his staff were very concerned
Dr. L. Roberts to Mr. F. Ferrin
Continued -Page Two 1/27/92
Ref: Project CIP 92-178
about the situation and very helpful in effecting a resolution. On their
recommendation and after hours of consultation, an independent surveyor,
Mr. David Grimes, was hired by the owners of 1656 Bayview Drive to solve
the problem. On several occasions, Mr. Grimes and his staff attempted to
confer and communicate with the Public Works Department; however Mr. Grimes
received no information or assistance from that group. Despite a seeming
lack of cooperation, Mr. Grimes did discover that all city records pertaining
to the monumenting of city streets were destroyed inthe early 1950s. About
that time, the city hired a Mr. Mike Denn to retrace the centerlines throughout
the city and the monuments he established have been used by local surveyors
ever since. Mr. Denn used a monument located at 9th Street, several hundred of
feet away, to establish the "new" centerline at the intersection of 16th Street
and Monterey Blvd.. The many resulting discrepancies in surveys over the years
is the result of a lack of concern, supervision, and competence by the city in
placing new markers instead of locating and maintaining original monuments.
Subsequently, Mr. Grimes actually located the original 16th Street monuments
and establish a more appropriate guideline for marking 16th Street and Monterey
Blvd.. This discovery was perfectly consistent with the 1928 C.W. Cook survey
in the area. As required by State law, he filed field notes and a Record of
Survey which were analyzed, approved, and recorded by the County. This elabled
the neighbors at 1656 and 1702 Bayview Drive to resolve the dispute and record
a Boundaryline Agreement regarding their properties. Equally important, other
surveyors have benefitted from Mr. Grimes' discovery and documetnation; thus
other home owners in the area have also benefitted from his work and expertise.
Throughout this period, the city was continuously appraised of the problem on
Bayview Drive and of the progress in correcting the situation. Despite an
apparent lack of interest by the city, numerous letters and even mylar copies of
the preliminary Record of Survey reviewed by the County were furnished to the
city. When the final Record of Survey was approved and recorded, the city was
asked to return the preliminary documents to avoid confusion and was given copies
of all final documents, mylar maps, and the Boundaryline Agreement. These copies
were furnished directly to Mr. Northcraft for the Department of Public Works and
to Mr. Grove for inclusion in the proper Building Department files. In addition,
Mr. Grimes offered to discuss his work with the city manager and staff to preclude
future problems of this nature, but no one had the interest to communicate with
him.
Dr. L. Roberts to Mr. F. Ferrin
Continued - Page Three 4/27/92
Ref: Project CIP 92-178
It was suggested that the city protect and preserve the monuments discovered
by Mr. Grimes. In Los Angeles, such monuments are encased in a metal pipe
with a screw-top cap to provide easy accessibility to any surveyor working in
the area. This is a comparatively inexpensive task and one that was approved
by the past city council.
When there was no response by the city to the idea of protecting and preserving
these established monuments, Mayor Midstokke was briefed on the matter. She
understood the problem and the recommendation for solution immediately. A
mylar copy of the Record of Survey and pertinent field notes were furnished
her for review with the Public Works Department. All maps and documentation
were to be returned if not needed by the city. Mayor Midstokke graciously
brought the matter of preserving the monuments to the past city council which
approved the action.
To date,three expensive mylar maps have been supplied to the city and to now
hear that the location of the monuments a1.not known is unbelievable. Apparent-
ly the staff is also unaware that additional copies may be obtained from the
Office of the County Surveyor. During all communication and correspondence with
the city, no one on the Engineering staff ever requested additional information
or maps. Equally astonishing is the current budget request to undertake the
same task already completed and paid for by a private citizen. Certainly the
city should not want to change something already approved and recorded by the
County.
SUGGESTIONS/REACTIONS TO THE REPORT
The proposal submitted seems to ignore the history of this problem and fails to
address the specific request by residents and the city council, i.e., simply to
cap the monuments discovered by Mr. Grimes for future surveys in the area. The
report also seems to add an unnecessary level of bureaucracy to reconciling any
similar problem in the future and adds an unreasonable financial burden on the
residents.
Requiring the surveyor to protect rediscovered monuments that were lost by the
city is absurd and a ridiculous delegation of routine responsibility.
Before this item is returned to the city council, I will be pleased to discuss
the situation with you and to physically show you the sites and locations of
the monuments. I will be pleased to accommodate your schedule and take as much
time as you require. I look forward to hearing from you.
LLR:ms
cc: Ms. Midstokke
Sincerely,
1*L6 71 -0 ---
Laurel Lee Roberts, Ph.D.
Attorney at Law
June 4, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 9, 1992
MULTIVISION CABLE INSTALLATION
In accordance with your instructions I have agendized the issue
of Multivision's cable installation under a portion of the Green-
belt. This represents the second half of a cable upgrade; the
Manhattan Beach portion is already in place, and the attached
proposal will complete the Hermosa -Manhattan buried distribution
cable.
Currently, the Hermosa main distribution cable is mounted on
poles and is not of fiber optic construction. The new cable will
be both buried and fiber optic. The benefits of this proposal
are twofold. First, the quality of the picture will be signifi-
cantly improved by the enhanced transmission capabilities of
fiber optics. Secondly, by burying the cable, the need for and
frequency of maintenance is reduced considerably. An ancillary
benefit is the aesthetic upgrade to the area resulting from the
elimination of an aerial cable.
Given the speed of installation (3 days) and pledge to return the
ground surface to its pre -installation state, I recommend your
support and approval of Multivision's plan.
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager
FRF/ld
J1UL115101UiN
MultiVision
June 3, 1992
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Dr.
Hermosa Beach CA 90254
Attn: Mr. Rick Ferrin
City Manager
RE: Preventative Maintenance Program
Dear Mr. Ferrin:
yyy HERMOSA BCH
�J OO2
As part of our ongoing Preventative Maintenance Program to ensure cable system reliability ar„
superior quality pictures, MultiVision proposes to replace and upgrade our existing main
distribution cable lines in the greenbelt area between Artmore and Valley Drive. In accordance
with your request, attached please find engineering specifications for the proposed cable routing. -
The cable will be placed underground in conduit at a depth of 30 inches to meet all required
specifications beginning 1000 feet south of Gould to the Manhattan Beach City limits. The total
project will consist of 1900 feet of underground cable distribution and take approximately 3 days
to complete. Given the limited nature of this construction Project we do not anticipate any
interference with the publics normal use of the greenbelt area. All property disturbed during
construction will be restored to its original condition by MultiVision.
We look forward to your favorable response to our request for permission to begin construction.
In the interim, if either T or my staff can answer any questions please don't hesitate to call me
directly.
Sincerely Yours,
r—TA,‘-ted_.47
Donald R. Granger
Regional Vice President
DRG:ean
attachment
MultiVision Cable TV
3041 East Miralo5na Avenue
Anaheim, CA 92806
714.6324222
DG1i2.as
� // 0Izi r`� Dtf•!� .f..,,::+ -_,...n¢ E1 i YJ? -, i --''t 1k
V�LLLI Da_V
!Ot?CI /-
z
J
* IAA STAU_ I -'J'" PJC.. 4'o Le ra., .
*sac VAUL75 IV . AIL.C.I.L v i V L '•r" frit Iii.
i' MAKI TS.FJIii1 I LOFIL,. f)5J Ijlt:F. Flx- _ tiL •
A( PIT rlr.lo eoR.E (? 514•x'LIT e VOLE 4ro+i-•t.e.
DR; +IF ?JEW �T
HERM0ST; FLIT
1--
3i n' _ — _
1
-I
I.
. I.
IbluLJ r,W)IU'tJ
f,e�c p P.rxcrlF• /25.:1-11 'S . To FbtE„ #--r.+--l2 /LE 51bWA+
..•rno, ►o DT
OAK' i
i --Z1. 1 L /
I/1 t� �7TA DO a LE
nw4WM MT
hinC.DIk EDP, P.
onAwnw «uwtU
•
• u •,. I• eelIYO•M .w. a• •
• r
CO
w
CRR
O
7146304353
N
Cll
m
CO
632 25th Street
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
June 8, 1992
Hermosa Beach City Council
Dear Hermosa Beach City Council,'
I am a homeowner on 25th Street in Hermosa Beach. I understand that you are
planning to approve a request from the cable TV company to run an aerial cable
from the greenbelt on the east side of Ardmore across Ardmore to a pole on the
west side of Ardmore.
I wish to protest the aerial cable. Please do not add more wires in the air. It
obstructs the view from my house, and is ugly. It lowers the property values in
Hermosa. Should we ever wish to have Edison remove the west side pole
completely by moving the guy wires elsewhere, it will be much easier and cheaper if
there is no wiring on that pole.
If the cable can be run underground in Manhattan Beach, and elsewhere, then I
think you should insist on an underground cable in Hermosa Beach at 25th Street
also.
Thank you,
omA0Q
Holly Baral
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
1'
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE DATE: JUNE 9, 1992
CITY COUNCIL
RE: MULTIVISION CABLE INSTALLATION FROM: WARREN CARTER
CABLE TELEVISION
COORDINATOR
*****************************************************************
*****************************************************************
While staff recognizes that the proposed upgrade of the cable
system between 25th and Boundary would improve the signal quality
and modernize the existing plant, staff would respectfully
request that if the City Council approves the request from
MultiVision to use the Greenbelt for undergrounding cable, that
the following requirements be addressed:
(1) Assure compliance with terms and conditions of PUC General
Order 128.
(2) Post bonds if required by the Public Works Department and
return premises to a condition satisfactory to the City.
(3) Secure lids of three (3) proposed vaults which would be
buried on the Greenbelt.
(4) To the City's satisfaction provide:
a) Indemnification against any potential future claims
arising from the construction.
b) Plan for crossing Gould Avenue at 30th Street.
c) Plan for reimbursement and/or notification for subscribers
who may lose service during the construction.
d) Timetable for the removal of coaxial cable currently
overhead.
(5) Restrict the use of the fiber/coaxial cable to uses as
contained in the terms and conditions of the City's franchise
agreement.
As the representatives from MultiVision Cable were provided with
a copy of the memo this afternoon, Council may wish to provide
them with additional time to provide the City with information
and/or responses.
MultiVision has completed similar work along the Parkway in
Manhattan Beach. It is reported that the work was completed on
schedule and with minimal disruption. The City staff in
Manhattan Beach assisted MultiVision with the landscaping of the
Parkway following project completion.
1
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION 7
v/T 6,74
/c .
June 8, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 9, 1992
DISSOLUTION OF THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT (VPD)
Background:
1. I must address several critical questions as opposed to a
rehashing of the history of the VPD since its inception in
the early 60's. In order to prepare the Council for a very
significant policy decision, staff will facilitate that dis-
cussion by addressing the following questions:
A. Does Hermosa Beach need a VPD?
B. Who and what is the Board of Parking Place
Commissioners?
C. What are the powers of the Board?
D. What are the restrictions to those powers?
E. What sort of oversight does the Council want?
2. The VPD, Vehicle Parking District, is an area of real estate
which comprises the Hermosa Beach downtown business dis-
trict, and it is an entirely commercial zone. The VPD was
established in accordance with the Vehicle Parking District
Law as part of a process to purchase parking lots with down-
town business properties as bonded collateral. The VPD,
administered and operated by a board of Council -appointed
commissioners, repaid the bonds for the lots. While the
bonds were still outstanding, a VPD had to be in effect;
however, when the bonds were paid off, the VPD and the Board
of Commissioners were no longer required. Nevertheless,
they continued (until dissolved in 1984) to oversee and di-
rect the operation and enhancement of the City owned down-
town business parking lots. Without an established and cen-
trally directed parking district, there would be no or-
ganized, standardized parking for the City's downtown com-
mercial district. Clearly some sort of VPD should exist to
insure the availability of established, standardized and
albeit sometimes inadequate parking for patrons of the down-
town business community.
3. A Board of Parking Place Commissioners must oversee the VPD
if a. VPD exists. The Board can be the City Council, or the
legislative body may appoint a three or five -member Board of
Commissioners from members of the local business district.
Regardless of the composition of the Board, it is that enti-
ty that acts to exercise primary jurisdiction over the man-
agement and operation of the Vehicle Parking District. The
Streets and Highways Code empowers the Board to "operate,
manage, and control the parking places and make and enforce
all necessary regulations for their use". The code con-
tinues to authorize the Board to "fix, regulate and collect
rentals, fees or charges, appoint employees, lease or grant
franchises for parking places, and improve any parking place
under its charge" (Sections 31780, 31781, 31785, 31786, and
31792). This is who and what the Board of Parking Place
Commissioners is and does respectively.
4. The Board of Parking Place Commissioners, by provision and
intent of the Streets and Highways Code, is a very powerful
organization. If the Board is a group appointed by the
Council, it is the most autonomous of the City Commissions
or Boards. Once appointed, the Board is vested with the
authority not only to oversee and direct the operation of
the District's parking facilities but jurisdiction over ex-
penditures of money created within the Parking District is
solely under the authority of the Board of Parking Place
Commissioners as well (see H. B. Ordinance No. 90-1037).
There are, however, some limitations to the authority vested
in the Commissioners. First, recall that the Streets and
Highways Code Section 31827 allows "all revenues from fees,
charges or rental... may be used for the acquisition, im-
provement, maintenance, repair, and operation of any parking
places for the use and benefit of the District." An often
asked question arises. Can the Board buy a piece of equip-
ment that might be used, upon occasion or even regularly,
outside the VPD? The City Attorney has opined that this
purchase would be legitimate "as long as the piece of equip-
ment was to be used primarily for improvement, maintenance,
repair or operation of any parking places that benefits the
District". Another pertinent question concerns the ap-
propriateness of the expenditure of District revenues for a
study without City Council approval. The answer lies in for
whose benefit is the study being performed. If it were for
the benefit of the District, the expenditure without Council
approval is appropriate. However, contracts for the lease
or purchase of real or personal property where the VPD is
the purchaser or lessee are required to be made by the Coun-
cil. The differentiation between the aforementioned "equip-
ment" and "personal property" might well cause confusion.
This point of confusion leads to the next and most crucial
point.
5. What sort of control or input does the Council want over its
appointed Board of Commissioners? It is clear that the
Council is deeply concerned with the financial viability,
operations, goals and objectives of the VPD and it governing
Board. How then does the Council execute its responsibility
for oversight of its appointed Board? I respectfully inter-
pret the Council's concerns to be their appropriate desire
to influence the Board's actions, decisions, and expendi-
tures in accordance with the best interests of Hermosa Beach
and the mandates of our residents. If the Council were to
have such input I doubt their desire to repudiate the Board
and reinstitute themselves as the VPD's governing body.
Analysis:
Given the myriad of complex policy issues facing the Council
in the coming months, I would question their capacity to
personally administer and operate the VPD without a serious
cost to other less pressing but pertinent issues. Dissolu-
tion of the District could undermine the organization and
standardization of downtown business district parking and
has the potential to be deleterious to existing and poten-
tial businesses in the downtown area. My analysis of the
situation leads me to the conclusion that the Council must
decide whether or not to accept the Board's inherent autono-
my. Unqualified refusal to accept the Board's authority
over District parking affairs will mandate the Council's
motion to dissolve the Board. This action leaves Council
little choice but to become the Board of Commissioners it-
self or completely dissolve the District. Further, it ap-
pears that by Code a Board of Commissioners must have juris-
diction over parking operations in the District. It cannot
be a "Board of Commissioners" if it is to execute an adviso-
ry role only. An advisory role could only be affected if
the current Board were abolished by Council action, replaced
by the Council and reconstituted with either new or the same
members as advisors to the new Board. I question the ac-
ceptability of this action to the serving members on the
Board.
Recommendation:
Cognizant of the demands upon the Council, I recommend joint
Council - Board of Parking Place Commissioners study ses-
sion(s) in which mutually acceptable goals and objectives
are established and then periodically reviewed. This pro-
cess will ensure critical Council input and guidance without
direct and nonproductive conflict over jurisdiction which
can only result in an either entirely hands-on or hands-off
posture for the Council. Once feasible and attainable goals
and objectives are established, I recommend the Director of
Finance provide liaison on_a continual basis between the
Council and the Board since most of the issues are of a
monetary bent. As the director of the execution and im-
plementation of Council policy and guidance, I too can at-
tend all scheduled Board meetings. The critical item here
is the positive communication of Council guidance and input
to the Board before they execute actions and direct the
operation of the District.
Conclusion:
The dissolution of the VPD and the Board of Commissioners is
clearly a major policy issue, and it must be a Council deci-
sion. However, short of that extreme, I offer the aforemen-
tioned recommendation as a prudent course to follow in an
effort to not overburden Council and to ensure critical
Council guidance. If my proposal fails, Council can then
move to dissolve the Board, vesting District jurisdiction in
itself or another appointed group of commissioners.
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager
FRF/ld
94/9%'
June 1, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the City Council
RECOMMENDATION
June 9, 1992
SOUTH SCHOOL SITE: CITY YARD
It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community
Resources Commission that Council not include the South School
site as a potential relocation site for the City Yard.
BACKGROUND
The 4.51 acre South School property was purchased by the City on
January 10, 1992. Subsequent to this purchase, the Commission
has been receiving public input on and discussing a potential
master plan for park development.
If the oil drilling project gets underway in Hermosa Beach, it is
anticipated that the City Yard will need to be relocated on both
a temporary and permanent basis. Previous Council direction has
been to study two possible sites for this relocation: the
Community Center (lot area) and South School.
At their April 27, 1992 meeting, the Commission voted to
recommend that the South School site be developed as a park in
its entirety and directed staff to forward this recommendation to
the Council for consideration.
ANALYSIS
As the park master plan process involves a substantial commitment
of time from a Commission standpoint, understanding just how much
parkland will be available to them is of paramount importance.
The Commission is committed to recommending the park not be
considered as a relocation site for the yard and is interested in
hearing from the Council prior to continuing with the master plan
study process.
As Macpherson Oil has provided $21,000 for a relocation study,
should the Council share the Commission's opinion, it would be
prudent to eliminate this site from the study.
9
Other alternatives available to Council include:
1) Request that the South School site remain a potential
relocation site for the yard.
2) Request additional information.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Commission minutes from April 27, 1992 special hearing.
2. Council agenda item "Request for Proposal for Preliminary
Site Investigation for Relocating the City Yard" June 26
1990.
3. City Council minutes from June 26, 1990 meeting.
4. Council agenda item "City Yard Relocation" Oct. 24, 1989.
Respectfully submitted,
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager
2
Mary . R••ney, Director
Com,' nity Resources Dept.
Further explained slope in the park. Suggested fencing the
building at night to prevent vagrancy and suggested community
room and recreation storage as possible uses of building.
Suggested motion sensitive lights in area.
Martin Cochran - 517 Loma Dr.
Suggested use for existing building is to schedule classes like
those offered at South Bay Adult School.
Ken Conklin - 501 - 4th Street
Liked basketball court idea but does not want volleyball courts.
Also feels that proposed parking is excessive. Concerned about
too much lighting and reminded Commission that there are a lot of
residents near the park.
Frances Parker - 521 1/2 Loma
Further addressed substance flow from body shops.
Note: Next scheduled Commission meeting is May 21st at 7:30 p.m.
in the Council Chambers
Note: Staff will draft a maintenance budget for the park for the
next three months.
Note: Staff is requested to get a bid on the cost of a
typographical map for the area and report to the Commission.
Ken Conklin - 501 - 4th St.
Suggested the Commission proceed with process of planning the
park and let Council decide to stop process (if necessary) to
relocate the city yard there.
Motion: "To inform Council that the Commission supports keeping
the park a park and would also like a commitment from Council not
to move the City Yard to the South School site."
McCurdy/Reviczky All Ayes
Note: Staff will try to put the park survey in the upcoming
summer recreation brochure as well as make it available to the
public.
Motion: "To set a date for the next public hearing at the next
regular Commission meeting." Reviczky/Peirce All Ayes
Jim Lissner - El Oeste
Suggested utilizing the cable television to advertise survey and
suggested to set up a "hot line" 24-hour answering machine for
public comments.
ADJOURNMENT: 9:20 P.M.
Commission 4/27/92 special
/�
.
June 19, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council June 26, 1990
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR PRELIMINARY SITE INVESTIGATION FOR
RELOCATING THE CITY YARD
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Authorize the staff to advertise the attached request for a
preliminary site investigation of two potential sites for
relocation of the City Yard.
2. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary.
Background:
At the October 24, 1989, meeting; the City Council reviewed six
sites and voted to further study three of the sites.
On January 23, 1990, the City Council received and filed a staff
recommendation to authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement for a
feasibility study at a cost of $9,500 ($8,500 plus contingency).
The staff recommended also that the City Council appropriate
$9,500 from the General Fund Designation for Capital Improvements
and assign those funds to CIP 91-608.
Subsequently, during the EIR public hearings; Council indicated a
desire to eliminate the Self Storage site from further
consideration. Therefore, it the staff's understanding that
only two (2) sites are still to be considered.
MacPherson Oil was requested to consider advancing the funds for
this study. The project was put on hold until a response was
provided from the oil company. MacPherson Oil has now
tentatively agreed to fund the required study in order to
fullfill the conditions of the environmental impact review
process which requires the study of at least two alternatives.
Analysis:
The City Council has considered the relocation of the Public
Works Yard to two potential locations:
1. Adjacent to the Community Center; south of Pier Avenue and
east of Ardmore Avenue;
2. South School property, between Valley Drive and Monterey
Boulevard and between 6th Street and 2nd Street.
A request for proposal has been prepared to advertise for a
preliminary site investigation to be provided from an outside
consultant.
1
The consultant is to provide services leading to the submission
of a report including a preliminary site investigation study and
preliminary layouts at each of the two sites.
The purpose of this report is to provide adequate information for
the City Council to make a decision as to which of the two sites
the City should pursue for the final site.
Funding Source:
No City funds will be expended until MacPherson Oil Company
deposits money (for this study) with the City.
Alternatives:
Other alternatives available to the City Council and considered
by staff are:
1. Decide on which site to use without any feasibility study.
This is not recommended.
2. Add or delete potential public works yard locations.
Respectfully Submitted: Conc
Lynn A. Terry, P.E.
Deputy City Engineer
Noted For Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
Anthony Antich
Director of Pub 'c Works
Michael Schubach
Planning Director
Kevin B. Northcraft
City Manager
cc: Don MacPherson, MacPherson Oil Company
ty/rfpyard
2
Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered, noting
the objection of Sheldon.
The Meeting recessed at 9:50 P.M.
The Meeting reconvened at 10:04 P.M.
6. REVIEW DELIN•UENT REFUSE CHARGES FOR CONSIDERATION OF
PLACING SAID CHARGES ON THE TAX ROLLS AS A SPECIAL AS-
SESSMENT, with resolution for adoption. Memorandum from
Building and Safety Director William Grove dated June
19, 1990.
The public hearing was opened.
There being no one wishing to speak on this matter, the public
hearing was closed. p lic
Action: To adopt Resolution No.
90-5379, entitled“A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AUTHORIZING, AND
DIRECTING THE COUNTY ASSESSOR TO INCLUDE DELIN•UENT
REFUSE BILLS AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO BE COLLECTED AT
THE SAME TIME AND IN THE SAME MANNER AS COUNTY TAXES.'.
Motion Sheldon, second Wiemans. So ordered.
7. PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT RE. HEIGHT OF HEDGES AND FENCES
AND ADOPTION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION, with ordinance for
introduction. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael
Schubach dated June 18, 1990.
Director Schubach responded to Council questions.
The public hearing was opened.
There being no one wishing to speak on this matter, the public
hearing was closed.
Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 90-1038.
Motion Essertier, second Mayor Creighton. So ordered.
Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No.
90-1038, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 1215 OF THE HERMOSA
BEACH ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING RE•UIREMENTS FOR FENCES
AND HEDGES, AND ELIMINATING CHAPTER 15 OF THE HERMOSA
BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
NEGATIVE DECLARATION.fl
Motion Mayor Creighton, second Sheldon.
AYES: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor
Creighton
NOES: None
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
8. ~TMAPPROVAL OF RE.UEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR PRELIMINARY
SITE
INVESTIGATION FOR RELOCATING THE CITY YARD. Memorandum
page 7
Minutes 06-26-90
from Public Works Director._Anthony Antich dated June 19,
1990.
Addressing Council on this matter were:
Don Macpherson, of Macpherson Oil, who responded to
a Council question stating that he was in favor
of the preliminary investigation for both
sites.
Mary Lou Weiss, 2506 Ardmore Avenue, Hermosa Beach
City School Board, who expressed concern about
the possibility that the South School site was
being considered as a possible relocation site
for the City Yard.
Proposed Action: To remove the South School site from
consideration and reconsider the Self -Storage site.
Motion Midstokke. Motion died for lack of a second.
':Action:, To authorize staff to advertise the proposed
request for a preliminary site investigation of two
potential sites (adjacent to the Community Center, south
of Pier and east of Ardmore, and, the South School
property) for relocation of the City Yard; and,
authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary.
Motion Sheldon, second Essertier. So ordered, noting
the objection of Midstokke.
October 17, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
October 24, 1989
the Hermosa Beach City Council
CITY YARD RELOCATION
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council review and comment on
this report analyzing possible sites for the City yard.
Background:
In 1984, the electorate of the City of Hermosa Beach voted to use
the existing City Yard as an oil drilling site. Due to the small
size of the site and the possibility of additional wells and
production facilities on the site, the oil drilling use and the
City yard use are not compatible on the property. Thus, the City
yard functions need to relocate. Also, irrespective of the oil
issues, the yard facilities are inadequate at this time. In the
future the present yard will continue to be inadequate for the
City's needs and will require major renovation.
Analysis:
The following sites were reviewed:
1. The South School site
2. The Community Center
3. The Self Storage site South of City Hall
4. The South Bay Hospital site on Pacific Coast Highway
5. The Hermosa View School site
6. The Edison Highwire area outside of the City.
Only publicly owned lands were looked at and no private property
was considered except for the storage site. The sites are listed
below in the order of desirability *based on factors discussed
further in this report.
Site Area
1. South School
2. Community Center
3. Self Storage
4. Hospital Site
5. Hermosa View School
6. Edison Highwires
4.46 Acres
1.60 Acres
0.78 Acres
1.71 Acres
4.57 Acres
4.80 Acres
1. South School
This site is located on the west side of Valley Drive, south
of 6th Street.
PROS
1. Existing property is not in use at this time.
2. Usable area is 3.46 acres which is adequate for
further Public Works functions.
3. Access could be off either Cypress Avenue or Valley
Drive.
1
CONS
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
4. Existing building could be used for offices.
5. Existing parking lot is adequate for parking use.
6. Existing property is graded and no earthwork would be
required.
1. While the City is negotiating its purchase, the
property is currently owned by the School District.
2. One (1.0) acres is proposed to be used for oil
storage tanks.
3. Residential property is located to the west and
south.
4. The property is zoned open space by a vote of the
people limiting structures to 10%.
2. Community Center
This site is located south of the existing Community Center
buildings.
PROS
1. The property is City owned, therefore no condemnation
or purchase of property would be necessary.
2. The site is bordered by a residential area only on
the south side.
3. Access from Ardmore Drive could be established.
4. The possibility of vacating Ardmore Avenue is raised
in the Circulation Element, and would expand
available space.
CONS
1. The usable size of the site for Public Works use and
excluding the existing Community Center buildings is
I
1
1
1
r
1
approximately 1.60 acres which is equal in size to
the existing city yard site; future expansion would
be difficult. The property is zoned open space (os).
2. A multi -story building would have to be constructed
to, accommodate office, maintenance facilities and
equipment storage.
3. Present access to the site is only from Pacific Coast
Highway and Pier Avenue.
4. The existing tennis courts would have to be
relocated.
3. Self storage Site
This site is located at Bard Street and Valley Drive directly
south of City Hall.
PROS
1 CONS
1
1
w
1
1
9
1. Existing building could be fully utilized for offices
and storage of equipment.
2. Access to the facility is good.
3. The site would be located adjacent to City Hall.
4. The property is presently zoned M-1.
1. Property would have to be purchased and it is not for
sale.
2. Site would not allow for future expansion beyond the
area of the existing building.
3. The area is only half of the size of the existing
Public Works yard.
4. Residential areas border two sides of the property.
4. South BaL Hospital Site
PROS
1. Access to the property is good because the site is
located on PCH.
2. Existing buildings could be used as ready made
offices.
3. Site is fully graded and improved with parking.
CONS
1. This site of 1.71 acres is just slightly larger than
the present city yard site of 1.59 acres and does not
allow for expansion of potential future functions.
2. The hospital district is proposing the site for
senior housing which would remove the site from
consideration.
3. The cost or this site would be approximately 4 times
higher than any other site.
4. Egress from the property would only be allowed to
exit southbound onto PCH.
1
5. Residential property owners in the area may not
approve of the use.
6. The property is zoned C-3 and residential for senior
housing.
5. Hermosa View School
Hermosa View School, located on Prospect Avenue between 18th
and 19th Streets.
PROS
1. Area is adequate and 4.57 acres in size which allows
for expansion of future functions.
2. Existing buildings could be used for office and shop
functions and storage. This area is zoned
unclassified.
3. One point of access to vehicle storage area, thus
more security.
• 4. The playground area is already graded and level, thus
no grading would be required. This area is zoned
open space (os).
CONS
1. Presently used as a bilingual school; students would
have to meet at a different location.
2. Temporary mobile classrooms may have to be relocated.
3. Residential use on all 4 sides of property.
4. Cost of existing permanent buildings is estimated at
2.28 million, this does not include the value of the
land.
6. Edison Highwire area
This site is just south of Herondo Street and west of Pacific
Coast Highway in Redondo 3each. Southern California Edison
has indicated that the property -has already been leased and
is not available, however staff has reviewed the site.
PROS
1. Area was an adequate size for future development.
2. No major grading would be required.
CONS
3. Access is available to a major street.
4. No residential use is immediately adjacent to this
site.
1. Buildings cannot be located under the high wires.
2. There are no existing buildings which could be
utilized for offices or storage.
Respectfully Submitted: Concur:
Lynn A. Terry P.E. Antony Antich
Deputy City Engineer Director of Pu lic Works
Noted For Fiscal Impact: Concur:
Viki Copeland
Kevin B. Nort craft
Director of Finance City Manager
June 3, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council June 9, 1992
NOTIFICATION OF. ABSENCES OF BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONER
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file this
report.
Background:
At the City Council's regularly scheduled meeting of June 26,
1990, the City Council approved the re-establishment of a
separate Vehicle Parking District Board of Parking Place
Commission, to staggered three (3) year terms. The appointing
ordinance (90-1036) provided for notification to the Council when
the absences of a Commissioner reach a certain level.
"Two (2) absences from regularly scheduled meetings of any
member within one (1) calendar quarter, and/or four (4) absences
from regular meetings within one (1) calendar year, constitutes
grounds for removal. There shall be no distinction between
excused and unexcused absences. When this level of absences
occurs, the staff liaison shall promptly notify the city council,
the board, and the member. The commissioner may be removed by
the four-fifths vote of the city council, pursuant to California
Streets and Highway Code, Section 31775."
Commissioner Gerald Compton, appointed July 9, 1990, and whose
term expires July 27, 1992, has missed two (2) meetings" (April 7,
1992 and June 2, 1992) during the second quarter (April - June)
of this year. Mr. Compton did however, call and request to be
excused from the meeting, due to a prior obligation which could
not be rescheduled or postponed.
Analysis:
Mr. Compton, has been an active and integral member of the Board
during the past two (2) years. His knowledge and expertise have
been instrumental in accomplishing many of the Board's goals, and
he is desirous of continuing his involvement as a Board member.
Although the Council may by a 4/5 vote remove a commissioner, a
mandatory vacancy is not created, and Staff recommends that Mr.
Compton retain his appointment to the Board, and in that
12a
r
capacity, continue his valuable contributions to the community.
CONCUR:
i
Henry f. Staten, Acting
Services Director
Genera
Frederick R. Ferrin,
City Manager
Respectfully submitted to,
Henry L. Staten, Acting
General Services Director
by
Michele D. Tercero,
Administrative Aide
J VI 1 :Jµ =� 1�f _'+=+ LI -n '•.'� f l�_L Vr HLcc.m I kz. Wltl'IHI'YJ
TO:
RE:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
MESSRS. ESSERTIER, EDGERTON AND BENZ
DOWN ZONING OF THE R-3 AREA
JUNE 4, 1992
L7%
/ / v
x/9/9
THIS IS AN OPEN LETTER TO THIS COUNCIL'S MAJORITY VOTING FOR
THE 5 -FOOT HEIGHT REDUCTION IN THE R-3 AREA. IT SENDS A CHILLING
REMINDER OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S POWER TO TAKE AWAY A HOMEOWNER'S
RIGHTS.
WHETHER THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN DEVELOPED TO THE FULL EXTENT OF
THE LAW OR WHETHER THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY IS A MERE TWINKLE IN
THE OWNER'S EYE, THE RIGHTS OF ALL R-3 AREA HOMEOWNERS ARE THE
SAME. WHETHER OR NOT YOU BELIEVE THAT THE HOMEOWNER WHOSE PROPERTY
WAS NOT "MAXXED OUT," IS ENTITLED TO HIS DREAM, PROPERTY RIGHTS OF
PEOPLE SIMILARLY SITUATED MUST BE ACCORDED EQUAL DIGNITY.
LOWERING DENSITY BY MAKING A 5 -FOOT HEIGHT REDUCTION IS DOWN -
ZONING: THE TOTAL SQUARE FEET OF LIVING SPACE WHICH AN OWNER CAN
PLACE ON THE PROPERTY IS REDUCED. THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY IS
REDUCED. AFTER ALL, PROPERTY RIGHTS CONSIST OF THE TOTAL USES TO
WHICH THE PROPERTY CAN BE DEVELOPED. IF THE PROPERTY HAS A LESSER
NUMBER OF ALLOWABLE USES, SUCH AS OPEN -SPACE PROPERTY, ITS VALUE IS
LOWER.
REMEMBER, NOT ONE OF THE MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE WAS IN FAVOR
OF YOU GETTING INVOLVED IN THE HEIGHT REDUCTION; THE LEAST YOU
COULD HAVE DONE WAS INVITE PEOPLE FROM THE COMMUNITY SUPPORTING
YOUR POSITION.
SAYING THAT PROPERTY "VALUES" WILL NOT BE AFFECTED IS WISHFUL
THINKING, AND LESS THAN HONEST. BEAR IN MIND THAT MOST OF THE
PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE PAID HUGE AMOUNTS OF MONEY FOR THE RIGHT TO
OWN PROPERTY IN THIS CITY.
TELLING AN AUDIENCE, WHO MAY HOPED TO HAVE SOME INPUT THROUGH
"COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION" IN MAJOR DECISIONS AFFECTING THE
COMMUNITY, THAT THEY ARE "DEVELOPERS," IS INVITING THE AUDIENCE TO
RISE UP AND BE HEARD FROM.
THIS CITY HAS N -E -V -E -R HAD VIEW PROTECTION ORDINANCES, AND
YET THIS IS PRECISELY WHAT YOUR AGENDA PROPOSES, AND YOU ARE USING
YOUR NEIGHBOR'S POCKETBOOK TO DO SO. WHILE ANY COUNCIL HAS
CONSIDERABLE DISCRETION IN TAKING ALL KINDS OF ACTION CLAIMING THAT
THE PUBLIC WELFARE IS THEREBY ENHANCED, BEAR IN MIND THAT YOUR ACTS
ARE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC REFERENDUM.
ALBERT . WIEMANS
13c