Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/28/92556 `% o' -t -e( 7 — /o 7 y "Now and then it's good to pause in our pursuit of happiness and just be happy." -Anonymous AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 28, 1992 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 7:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR Robert Essertier MAYOR PRO TEM Albert Wiemans COUNCILMEMBERS Robert Benz Sam Y. Edgerton Kathleen Midstokke CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Frederick R. Ferrin CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart- ment, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Cham- ber of Commerce. During the meeting a packet also is available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PLAQUE OF APPRECIATION: Laurie Byren, for service as President and Board Member of the Community Center Foundation. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on July 14, 1992. (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the June, 1992 finan- cial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report. (e) Recommendation to receive and file the 4th quarter Capi- tal Improvement Program status report. Memorandum from Public Works Department dated July 21, 1992. (f) Recommendation to award bid for purchase of computer equipment for the Police Department to Mikon Computer Systems. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated July 20, 1992. (g) Recommendation to approve the City's participation in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Implementation Agreement. Memorandum from Public Works Department dated July 21, 1992. (h) Recommendation to approve the retention of the main- tenance building located at the southwest corner of Clark Field in order to allow community volunteers the time to raise the necessary funds to renovate the build- ing. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated July 21, 1992. (i) Recommendation to receive and file report regarding aging of parking citations in the computer system. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated July 21, 1992. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 2 * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Memorandum from Parks, Recreation and Community Resour- ces Commission dated July 21, 1992 regarding Greenbelt parking. (b) Letter from Board of Parking Place Commissioners dated July 14, 1992 regarding Greenbelt parking. (c) Letter from Paul Ishikawa dated June 19, 1992 regarding a capped oil well that is leaking; City action and response dated June 24, 1992. (d) Letter from Howard Longacare dated July 22, 1992 regard- ing badges for councilmembers. (e) Letter from Letitia Lombardelli dated July 17, 1992 regarding front yard parking. (f) Letter from Nancy Rutledge -Hallett dated July 22, 1992 regarding front yard parking. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. NONE MUNICIPAL MATTERS 5. CITY RECORDS MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated July 14, 1992. (Con- tinued from July 14, 1992 meeting.) 6. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) Response to questions raised at July 14, 1992 meeting on Demands and Warrants list. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated July 23, 1992. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL 8. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. Request by Councilmember Benz for consolidation of the three minute Citizen Comment period with the one minute period at the beginning of Council meetings. 3 CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT 4 Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City. Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Councilmeetings often. 'Meetings are televised live on Multiyision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for:=meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or oral- ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet com- pilation, they will: be distributed ,prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the) notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be— gin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with -the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. _ Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over). THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni- ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or- dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi- nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. ACTION SHEET ACTION SHEET REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 28, 1992 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 7:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY ELAINE DOERFLING AT 7:57 P.M. ROLL CALL: AL WIEMANS ABSENT PLAQUE OF APPRECIATION: Laurie Byren, for service as President and Board Member of the Community Center Foundation. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING MAYOR GAVE TO VIKI COPELAND. MAYOR ANNOUNCED CELEBRATION OF 30TH ANNIVERSARY OF LIBRARY. OPEN HOUSE WILL BE HELD SATURDAY, AUGUST 8, FROM 1 TO 4 P.M. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SHIRLEY CASSELL - SPOKE ABOUT LAW SUIT MENTIONED IN NEWSPAPER. MENTIONED FINANCIAL STRAITS OF CITY QUESTIONED COUNCIL ILLEGAL DECISION ON 2901 HERMOSA AVENUE. JOSEPH FERSHARD (?), 505 ANDERSON ST. M.B. - SOUTH LANE ON ARD - MORE LESS THAN FEDERAL HIGHWAY MINIMUM WIDTH OF 10 FT. EITHER DISALLOW PARKING OR INCREASE WIDTH OF STREET. RE = ASKED IF RESIDENT WOULD WRITE A LETTER TO CITY MGR. MERNA MARSHALL - VALLEY/ARDMORE TWO WAY TRAFFIC WHERE IT JOINS M.B. ONE WAY, NEED DIRECTIONAL SIGNS INDICATING TWO WAY STREET. PAUL ISHAKAWA, 626 LOMA - RE. CAPPED OIL WELL. WAS TOLD CITY WOULD HAVE THE LEAKING OIL VACUUMED OUT LAST SATURDAY. OIL STILL THERE. C.M. SAID CHECKED TODAY AND IT IS DRY. RE - REVIEWED WHAT HAS BEEN DONE ABOUT FRONT YARD PARKING THUS FAR. MIDSTOKKE MOTION TO NOT BRING BACK AT NEXT MTG. AND READVERTISE FOR FOR A PUBLIC HEARING AT THE FOLLOWING MEETING. RE - NEED TO FINE TUNE ORDINANCE ON BOOKS. VOSE SAID IF ZONING CODE TO BE CHANGED MUST GO TO PLANNING COM- MISSION FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. RE/SE - SEND TO P.C. TO MAKE MODIFICATIONS NECESSARY TO CHANGE ORDINANCE. NO OBJECTIONS. IST TUESDAY IN SEPTEMBER WILL PROBABLY BE THE PLANNING COMMISSION DATE. MARK FREEMAN, 1900 BLOCK OF PALM DRIVE, SPOKE FOR ALL THE PEOPLE IN THE AUDIENCE ON THIS SUBJECT. CHARLES EVANS, 321 MANHATTAN, CONCERNED THAT COUNCIL MAY BE PLAY- ING WITH THE RESIDENTS QUOTING STATE LAWS WITH WHICH THE CITIZENS ARE NOT FAMILIAR. CONSENT CALENDAR: Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on July 14, 1992. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. PULLED BY RB - QUESTIONED CHARGES FOR TALERICO. WOULD LIKE TO KNOW HOURLY RATE. BSI CONSULTANTS - WHAT DO THEY DO. FEES ARE RECOVERED FROM THE PROJECT. PHOENIX GROUP ON OUT OF STATE CITES. WE CONTRACTED 2,200. SUGGESTS GETTING A PERSON FOR FINANCE SUPERVISOR POSITION THAT HAS SOFTWARE EXPERTISE TO DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN THE SYSTEM IN HOUSE. MOTION RB/RE TO APPROVE. SO ORDERED. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the June, 1992 finan- cial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report. (e) (f) Recommendation to receive and file the 4th quarter Capi- tal Improvement Program status report. Memorandum from Public Works Department dated July 21, 1992. Recommendation to award bid for purchase of computer equipment for the Police Department to Mikon Computer Systems. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated July 20, 1992. PULLED BY RB - MOTION SE/RE TO AUTHORIZE PURCHASE. SO ORDERED. RB - MOTION TO DEVELOP A PLAN OF ACTION ON HOW TO UTILIZE THIS MONSTER IN THE FUTURE, AND WE NEED TO CONCENTRATE ON MISTAKE MADE LAST PURCHASE. (g) Recommendation to approve the City's participation in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Implementation Agreement. Memorandum from Public Works Department dated July 21, 1992. 2 PULLED BY RB - RE. CLOSING THE BATHROOMS AT PIER HEAD. JOHN PORTER, 812 BARD STREET - THINKS WE SHOULD CHARGE BATHROOM FEES RATHER THAN CLOSE IT DOWN. SHIRLEY CASSELL - WHY CAN'T WE HAVE AN ATTENDANT TO COLLECT MONEY AND USE TO PAY FOR ATTENDANT. MICHAEL HALEY - AGAINST CLOSING BATHROOMS. MOTION KM/SE TO AGENDIZE BATHROOM ITEM AND NOT CLOSE UNTIL COUN- CIL DISCUSSES THIS ITEM. KM LOOK INTO CHARGING AND ALSO CONTACT THE STATE DEPT. FISH AND GAME RE. CLOSURE OF BATHROOMS - DO THEY HAVE ANY CONCERNS IF WE CLOSE. SO ORDERED. MOTION RB/SE TO APPROVE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN NPDES. SO ORDERED. LYNN TERRY WILL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION ABOUT SECOND YEAR IMPLEMEN- TATION PROGRAM. (h) (i) Recommendation to approve the retention of the main- tenance building located at the southwest corner of Clark Field in order to allow community volunteers the time to raise the necessary funds to renovate the build- ing. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated July 21, 1992. Recommendation to receive and file report regarding aging of parking citations in the computer system. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated July 21, 1992. MOTION KM/SE TO RECEIVE & FILE. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Memorandum from Parks, Recreation and Community Resour- ces Commission dated July 21, 1992 regarding Greenbelt parking. MOTION SE/RB TO RECEIVE & FILE. KM OBJECTED, WOULD LIKE THEM TO PARTICIPATE. (b) Letter from Board of Parking Place Commissioners dated July 14, 1992 regarding Greenbelt parking. MOTION RB/RE TO R & F, SO ORDERED. - 3 - (c) Letter from Paul Ishikawa dated June 19, 1992 regarding a capped oil well that is leaking; City action and response dated June 24, 1992. MOTION MOTION SE/RB TO R & F. SO ORDERED. (d) Letter from Howard Longacare dated July 22, 1992 regard- ing badges for councilmembers. KM MOTION TO CHANGE POLICY THAT COUNCILMEMBERS NOT RECEIVE BADGES. HAVE IT PUBLICLY DISCUSSED. JIM ROSENBERGER - AGREES WITH KM ON USE OF BADGES. SE - MOTION TO R & F. JUNE WILLIAMS - MENTIONED HISTORY BADGE POLICY IN 1986. KM POLICY STATED. MOTION SE/RB TO R & F. SO ORDERED. (e) Letter from Letitia Lombardelli dated July 17, 1992 regarding front yard parking. MOTION KM THAT LETTERS E & F BE INCLUDED WITH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. SECOND RE. SO ORDERED. (f) Letter from Nancy Rutledge -Hallett dated July 22, 1992 regarding front yard parking. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. NONE MUNICIPAL MATTERS 5. CITY RECORDS MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated July 14, 1992. (Con- tinued from July 14, 1992 meeting.) MOTION SE/RE TO SEE IF YOU CAN SELL SOME MORE PROP A AND THEN USE A PORTION OF UNRESERVED FUNDS. SECOND RE. MOTION SE/RE - TO PURSUE SELLING SURPLUS PROP A FUNDS AND NOT USE RESERVE FUNDS. NO OBJECTIONS SO ORDERED. 6. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) Response to questions raised at July 14, 1992 meeting on Demands and Warrants list. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated July 23, 1992. RB - LOOK AT REPLACING SOME OF THESE PRINTERS WITH MORE REASON- ABLY PRICED PRINTERS. 4 -p RB - MOTION TO LOOK INTO OUR ABILITY TO RUN THESE SYSTEMS ADE- QUATELY SO WE CAN CURB MAINTENANCE COSTS AND MAYBE GARNER SOME , SOFTWARE KNOWLEDGE. MOTION KM TO ELIMINATE BANNER DEPOSIT. SECOND ? SO ORDERED. NOTIFY THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. RE SUGGEST STREET CLEANING SEPARATELY. PACKAGE THEM SEPARATELY. THREE SEPARATE PACKAGES. NO NEED FOR BIDDERS BOND. THINKS VPD SHOULD HANDLE THEIR OWN MAINTENANCE COST. C.M. WILL HAVE BID PACKAGES PREPARED TO BID SEPARATELY ON SIDE- WALK CLEANING, STREET CLEANING, AND PIER MAINTENANCE, AND ALSO COLLECTIVELY. C.M. SAID WILL BRING BACK SECOND MEETING AUGUST. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL KM/RE WOULD LIKE JULY LETTER FROM SCHOOL DISTRICT RE. SALE OF SCHOOL PROPERTY TO BE REFERRED TO PARKS & REC. COMM. FOR RECOM- MENDATION TO BE AGENDIZED FOR CITY COUNCIL. MOTION FAILS 2-2. KM SPOKE ABOUT FINANCE SUPERVISOR WHY NOT ON AGENDA THIS TIME. RE - WANTS TO POLL COUNCIL ON WHETHER THEY WANT TO CONSIDER RAIS- ING THE HEIGHT LIMIT ON R-1 PROPERTY. ANY INTEREST IN A STRAW VOTE. 8. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (a) Request by Councilmember Benz for consolidation of the three minute Citizen Comment period with the one minute period at the beginning of Council meetings. SHIRLEY CASSELL - AGAINST CHANGE. MOTION RB TO COMBINE THE 3 MINUTES AND 1 MINUTES INTO A 3 MINUTE AT BEGINNING OF MEETING. SECOND SE. CITY ATTY. SUGGESTED GETTING COPIES OF OTHER CITIES AGENDAS TO SEE HOW THEY ARRANGE THEIR AGENDA. KM - NEW LAW ALLOWS PUBLIC TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM WE ARE CONSIDERING. SE/RE SUBSTITUTE MOTION STAFF COME UP WITH SOME OTHER CITIES AGENDAS AND PRESENT POSSIBLE CHANGES. SO ORDERED. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. JOE DIMONDA - STATUS OF BILTMORE SITE APPRAISAL. COULD HAVE AN EFFECT ON NOV. ELECTION. C.M. RESPONDED, SAYING HE WILL DIRECT THAT PUBLIC WORKS & BUILDING FIND OUT COST OF APPRAISAL AND HOW QUICKLY IT COULD BE EXECUTED. ADJOURNMENT AT 10:35 P.M. 6 Si -'lit AD - v//0192 - MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, July 28, 1992, at the hour of 7:x(7 P.M start page = 7882 CLOSED SESSION - the closed session was held at 7: P.M. regard- ing matters of potential litigation: pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b); and, employee meet and confer. The closed session was recessed at 7: P.M. to the regular scheduled public /i,q/ meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Mayor Essertier Absent: Wiemans ANNOUNCEMENTS - PLAQUE OF APPRECIATION: Laurie Byren, for service as President and Board Member of the Community Center Foundation Mayor Essertier PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FINANCIAL REPORTING - PUBLIC PART CIPATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN es?'/Yr�— Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: (( ( 5-t. City Council Minutes 07-28-92 Page 1 ((‘ 1. ga( Li/o /ri O • • 1. 1. Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., © Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., ffigo Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, Edie Webber - 1210 Eleventh Street, Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, r4r) CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (i), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3 but are listed in order for clarity: ( ) , (b) , (c) J) (d) , (e) , (f) /3 , (g), , (h) , and (i City Council Minutes 07-28-92 Page 2 • Motion , second . So ordered. Coming forward to address the council on items not removed from the consent calendar were: No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on July 14, 1992. (b) Action: To approve the minutes of the regular meeting of July 14, 1992 as Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. 41148 and 41362 through 41455 inclusive, noting voided warrant Nos. 41362, 41363, 41409, 41411, 41412, 41425, 41426, and 41427. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented./ (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. Recommendation to receive and file the June, 1992 finan- cial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report. City Council Minutes 07-28-92 Page 3 (e) (f) Action: To receive and file the June, 1992 financial reports as presented. Recommendation to receive and file the 4th quarter Capi- tal Improvement Program status report. Memorandum from Public Works Department dated July 21, 1992. Action: To receive and file the forth quarterly status report of Capital Improvement Programs for fiscal Year 1991-1992 showing eight (8) completed projects; ten (10) projects in progress; nine (9) projects on hold; and, one canceled project for a total of 28 projects with a total of $5,798,683 in budgeted expenditures. Recommendation to award bid for purchase of computer equipment for the Police Department to Mikon Computer Systems. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated July 20, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to au- thorize the purchase of computer equipment from Mikon Computer Systems at a cost not to exceed $36,000, funded through the Narcotics Forfeiture account with no impact on the General Fund, in order to complete the dispatch system by completing the Mobile Data Terminal (MDT) that allow officers to perform records check on vehicles and persons as well as communicate with other patrol units and the dispatch center. 12 (g) Recommendation to approve the City's participation in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (1464:2;" ;1_,LcirCity Council Minutes 07-28-92 Page 4 • /37/1 (NPDES) Permit Implementation Agreement. Memorandum from Public Works Department dated July 21, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. U Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve the City's participation in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Per- mit Implementation Agreement. (An agreement with 18 other cities to reduce pollutants to the Santa Monica Bay.) 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. (h) (i) Recommendation to approve the retention of the main- tenance building located at the southwest corner of Clark Field in order to allow community volunteers the time to raise the necessary funds to renovate the build- ing. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated July 21, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To approve the recommendation of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff and approve the retention of the maintenance building at the southwest corner of Clark Field in order to allow community volunteers until December 1993 to raise the estimated $35,000 for renovation of the building. Recommendation to receive and file report regarding aging of parking citations in the computer system. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated July 21, 1992. City Council Minutes 07-28-92 Page 5 .• Action: To receive and file the report on the aging of parking citations that showed 2,769 open citations of 91,785 issued in 1987-88; 5348 open citations of 82,102 issued in 1988-89; 12,611 open citations of 86,417 is- sued in 1989-90; 14,335 open citations of 68,625 issued in 1990-91; and, 19,946 open citations of 62,325 issued in 1991-92. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1(a) , (b) , (c) , (d) , (e) , (f) , (g) , (h) , and (i) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Memorandum from Parks, Recreation and Community Resour- ces Commission dated July 21, 1992 regarding Greenbelt parking. Action: To 717 (b) Letter from Board of Parking Place Commissioners dated July 14, 1992 regarding Greenbelt parking. Action: To City Council Minutes 07-28-92 Page 6 .. (c) Letter from Paul Ishikawa dated June 19, 1992 regarding a capped oil well that is leaking; City action and response dated June 24, 1992. Supplemental letter from City Treasurer Gary Brutsch dated July 23, 1992. (d) Action: To Letter from Howard Longacre dated July 22, 1992 regard- ing badges for councilmembers. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Z(/).9 A 7) Action: To � v 47i% (e) Letter from Letitia Lombardelli dated July 17, 1992 regarding front yard parking. City Council Minutes. 07-28-92 Page 7 Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Action: To (f) Letter from Nancy Rutledge -Hallett dated July 22, 1992 regarding front yard parking. Action: To PUBLIC HEARINGS - None City Council Minutes 07-28-92 Page 8 MUNICIPAL MATTERS 5. CITY RECORDS MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated July 14, 1992. (Con- tinued from July 14, 1992 meeting.) City Manager Ferrin presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. Proposed Action: '64%7 /9 it,761°' ) d,, 1)2f ) ' c Action: To IU , 414V/ U r2-(/ 6. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) Response to questions raised at July 14, 1992 meeting on Demands and Warrants list. City Manager Ferrin reported �--.' C- #'1> c7 City Council Minutes 07-28-92 Page 9 • 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL 7/f 8! . OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back A �- '� ' a ../ . it 400!>� / on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- (%f - action tonight. (a) 9 Request by Councilmember Benz for consolidation of the three minute Citizen Comment period with the one minute period at the beginning of Council meetings. Councilmember Benz discussed his request. 7/1 Proposed Action: To (- Action: To v.. G7���-City Counci v lc inutes 07-28-9 '/Page 1 v �., i' (' I ' [t • CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, Edie Webber - 1210 Eleventh Street, Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, (//Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, /r) v (40P ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday, July 28, City Council Minutes 07-28-92 Page 11 1992, at the hour of P.M. to a Regular Meeting to be held Tuesday, August 11, 1992, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 07-28-92 Page 12 /-e—et-d( u -.ted e^-; MR. MAYOR 8 COUNCUMEMBERS ALTHOUGH THE COUNCIL WAS WITHIN ITS LEGAL RIGHTS TO PUT FORTH A MOTION TO APPROVE SECTION 19-61, SUBSECTION M, I BELIEVE THAT THE PROCEDURES FOR ANALYSIS, REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION WERE INADEQUATE GIVEN THE NEGATIVE IMPACT THIS RESOLUTION HAS HAD ON THE WELLBEING OF THE COMMUNITY. SHOULD THIS RULE BE ENFORCED AS IT IS CURRENTLY WRITTEN, I BELIEVE IT WILL INCREASE THE ALREADY HORRID CONGESTION ON OUR STREETS AS WELL AS HAVE A DEMORALIZING PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECT ON A POPULO1IS THAT ALREADY FEELS OVER REGULATED AND LEFT OUT OF THE GOVERNING PROCESS. THERE IS THE APPEARANCE THAT THE REGULATION IS MORE THAN JUST TO RE-INFORCE AN EXISTING LAW (ZONING CODE SECTION 1157 D). IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS A DESIRE TO DICTATE TASTE AND DECORUM BEYOND THAT WHICH IS PERTINENT TO MAINTAINING THE QUALiTY OF OUR COMMUNITY. IT APPEARS THAT THE RULING MAY BE A SUBTERFUGE FOR INCREASING REVENUE THROUGH THE ARBITRARY FORM OF TAXATION CALLED A "FINE" . IF THIS NEW RULING WERE A NEW HOUSE OR BUILDING IT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO HAVE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY.. IF IT WERE A BUSINESS, IT WOULD REQUIRE A REVIEW FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. AND WE ALL KNOW HOW DETAILED AND LABORIOUS THOSE STUDIES WOULD BE. WHY IS IT THAT SUCH A DEVASTATING RULING SUCH AS SUBSECTION M SCAN BE IMPLEMENTED WITHOUT REASONABLE ANALYSIS PRIOR TO VOTING? WHY IS IT THAT HtTHE CITIZENS OF THIS COMMUNITY WERE NOT GIVEN THE FULL OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO ;!RESOLUTION PRIOR TO PASSAGE? WAS THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSITION PUBLISHED FOR WFLBLIC'SCRUTINY AND WAS IT AVAILABLE IN PRINT AT THE COUNCIL MEETING AT WHICH IT WAS VOTED UPON? ALSO, IF THE CITY ATTORNEY STATES DURING THE MEETING THAT THERE ARE SERIOUS QUESTIONS REGARDING HOW TO ENFORCE THE RULING, SHOULDN'T THE COUNCIL POSTPONE THE VOTE UNTIL THE PROBLEM IS RESOLVED? 1 WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST THAT SECTION 19-61, SUBSECTION M BE MODIFIED SO THAT IT NOT HAVE A NEGATIVE EFFECT ON PUBLIC PARKING AND STREET CONGESTION OR THAT IT BE RESCINDED. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, July 14, 1992, at the hour of 7:55 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - the closed session was held at 7:05 P.M. regard- ing matters of potential litigation: pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b); and, employee meet and confer. The closed session was recessed at 7:45 P.M. to the regular scheduled public meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mary Rooney, Community Resources Director ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Essertier Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS - City Council recognition of the Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation for their donation of $1,000 for new and brighter lighting in the Community Center Gymnasium. Mayor Essertier announced that tonight's meeting would be adjour- ned in the memory of Logan Cotton, former Hermosa Beach Council - member from 1930 - 1934 and Mayor from 1932 - 1934, who died July 2, 1992 at the age of 91. PROCLAMATIONS - Parks & Recreation Month, July, 1992: Mayor Essertier read a proclamation stating that park and recre- ation opportunities provide something of value to everyone as parks help preserve and protect the natural and cultural resour- ces of California and recreational experiences contribute to good health and enhance the quality of life, and proclaimed the month of July, 1992, as "Parks and Recreation Month". Mayor Essertier also displayed a tee-shirt that children under the age of twelve (12) could win and suggested they stop by the Community Center to find out how. Greenbelt Drought -Resistant Demonstration Garden: Mayor Essertier read a proclamation applauding the partnership of the Hermosa Valley School students and the West Basin Municipal Water District in producing a self guided drought -tolerant demon- stration garden on the Greenbelt, to be maintained by the City of Hermosa Beach, and encouraged the public to visit the site across from Valley School. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, requested that consent calendar items 1(b). and (f) be pulled for discussion; and, Cathy McCurdy - 1113 Valley Drive, representing the Hermosa Beach School Board; thanked the City, Community Resources, Mary Rooney, Mike Flaher- ty, and the West Basin Municipal Water District City Council Minutes 07-14-92 Page 7869 for their help with the drought -tolerant garden on the Greenbelt across from Valley School and invited the public to come see it; spoke on item 13(a) and asked the City to enforce its. laws to eliminate this problem. (The order of the agenda was suspended at 8:02 P.M. to go to the public hearings starting with item 5.) 1. .CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (h), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3 but are listed in order for clarity: (b) Midstokke, and (f) Wiemans. Councilmember Midstokke wished the record to note her abstention -on item 1(a)5, as she had been ab- sent from that meeting. Motion Wiemans, second Benz. So ordered. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) (b) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Special workshop meeting of City Council held on June 8, 1992; 2) Regular meeting-of'City Council held on June 9, 1992; 3) Special workshop meeting of City Council held on June 18, 1992; 4) Regular meeting of the City Council held on June 23, 1992; Supplemental memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated July 14, 1992; 5) Special Budget Public Hearing of City Council held on June 30, 1992. Action: To approve the minutes of the Special Workshop Meeting of June 8, 1992, the Regular Meeting of June 9, 1992, the Special Workshop Meeting of June 18,'1992, and the Special Budget Public Hearing Meeting of June 30, 1992 as presented, noting the abstention recorded by Midstokke on item 1(a)5 due to her absence at the meeting. Final Action: To approve the corrected minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 23, 1992 to read on the first two lines of page 7863, "the dissenting votes of Mid- stokke, Wiemans, and Mayor Essertier. There was no other action taken." Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. 41149 through 41358 inclusive, noting voided war- rants Nos. 41149, 41150, 41151, 41161, 41168, 41204, 41277, 41278, 41297, 41307, 41317, and 41319. City Council Minutes 07-14-92 Page 7870 This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting, as requested by June Williams. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, questioned who had authorized the $228 expenditure for City Treasurer Gary Brutsch to fly to Sacramen- to (City Manager Ferrin responded that he had made the authorization in order for Mr. Brutsch to appear with him before the State Lands Com- mission); and, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, stated City Trea- surer Brutsch had every right to do what is required of him in .the City. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented and to direct staff to bring a report back to Council on: 1) how the City could work with the City Attorney to reduce costs and use the time he was normally in the City to the best advantage; 2) the cost to the City for the temporary banner deposits and could the collection of the deposit be eliminated while this issue is under study; 3) a report on the $40,000 advanced to Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski as "flash money" for the Special Investigation Unit; 4) the status of the Specialty Maintenance contract for downtown cleaning and, 5) an explanation of the $2,500 for maintenance for two printers. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. So ordered. (c) (d) (e) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items. Recommendation to receive and file the June, 1992 in- vestment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary Brutsch dated July 6, 1992. Action: To receive and file the June, 1992 investment report. Recommendation to approve request for 30 day extension of temporary appointment for the Acting General Services Director. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated July 2, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to extend for thirty (30) days the temporary appointment of the Acting General Services Director. City Council Minutes 07-14-92 Page 7871 (f) Recommendation to confirm Planning Commission inter- pretation of Do -It -Yourself Brewery as a permitted use under the category of Hobby Supply. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated July 6, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Wiemans for separate discussion later in the meeting, as requested by June Williams. Planning Director Schubach responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, said her family had made home-brew; it smelled bad while brew- ing; the bottles could explode; it is alcohol; and it can be very strong; June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, questioned why this item had been on the consent calendar and why it had not required a C.U.P.; and, Patricia Spiritus - applicant, responded to Council questions; stated the business was regulated by the home-brew laws of the state and the federal government; there could be no sales to minors; and sales were limited to 100 gallons per adult per year. Proposed Action: To deny the staff recommendation and not approve the Planning Commission interpretation of business classification. Motion Wiemans. The motion died due to the lack of a second. (g) Action: To approve the staff recommendation to confirm the interpretation of the Planning Commission that a Do - It -Yourself Brewery should be classified as a hobby sup- ply business. Motion Benz, second Midstokke. The motion.. carried, noting the dissenting vote of Wiemans. Recommendation to approve request from Project Touch to sub -lease office space in Room 3 in the Community Center to the Director of Beach Cities Coalition (both lease rooms in the Community Center). Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated July 2, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the request from Project Touch to sub -lease office space in Room 3 in the Community Center to the Director of the Beach Cities Coalition. (h) Recommendation to receive and file report on cost per capita for recreation programs and services in Hermosa City Council Minutes 07-14-92 Page 7872 Beach and some surrounding cities. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated July 7, 1992. Action: To receive and file the information regarding cost per capita for recreation programs and services in Hermosa Beach and pome.surrounding Cities which shows the Community Resources Department has an operating bud- get of $359,000 for the 1991-92 fiscal year and esti- mated revenue for the same year is projected at $376,000 for a net per capita expenditure rate of minus 93 cents. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 92-1071 - AN ORDINANCE CONFIRMING THE RE- PORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATED MAY 21, 1992, PREPARED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 92-5521 AND APPROVED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 92-5538 OF SAID COUNCIL, THE MAP AND ASSESSMENT CONTAINED IN SAID REPORT; ORDERING CERTAIN CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE SERVICES TO BE FUR- NISHED AND MAINTAINED FOR FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1992. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 92-1071. Motion Mayor Essertier, second Wiemans. The motion car- ried, noting the dissenting votes of Benz and Midstokke. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 92-1072 - AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 29.6 "PROPERTY SURVEYS" TO THE CITY CODE REQUIRING CERTAIN STANDARDS PERTAINING TO PROPERTY SURVEYS WITHIN THE CITY. For adoption. Supplemental memorandum from City Treasurer Gary Brutsch dated July 6, 1992. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, said it was wrong to charge people, but the last survey was incorrect and it was time to survey the entire City. Action: To receive and file, noting that the Ordinance was a repetition of state law that Hermosa. Beach as .a general law city was bound to follow and it created an additional burden on single family remodels. Motion Midstokke, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Wiemans. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1(b) and (f) were discussed at this time but are shown in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. City Council Minutes 07-14-92 Page 7873 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from the Cable Television Advisory Board dated July 7, 1992 regarding Board funding and staffing. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Cable Television Advisory Board members: Scott Tollefsen, Gerry Schweitzer, Rick Learned, and Dave Reimer • 1) sought direction from the Council due to Coun- cil's action of eliminating the position of Cable Television Coordinator (part-time posi- tion that acted as liaison and technical advi- sor to the Board for the franchise negotia- tions) and not providing a budget for the work of the Board; 2) stated that this contract was very technical, would run for a number of years, concerned a great deal of revenue to the City through U.U.T. and franchise fees, concerned a great deal of cost to the residents through monthly bills, and could provide a great deal more ser- vice to both the City and the residents; 3) suggested that in order to provide the best contract possible for the City and the citizens of Hermosa Beach they would need a budget, technical and legal advisors, and support per- sonnel from the City; 4) suggested that the Cable Company had its staff of legal and technical support and if Hermosa Beach was to achieve a good contract it might need a budget of $75,000 for Board support during the negotiations; 5) reminded the Council that a portion, if not most, of this budget would be reimbursed to the City by the Cable Company in the franchise agreement; and, 6) requested that Manhattan Beach be asked for a copy of the survey it had conducted and the copy given to Scott Tollefsen for the Board. . General discussion ensued concerning a document to the Cable Company to ensure reimbursement to the City for renewal related expenses, the type of legal services that might be necessary, what documents• other cities have prepared, and the possibility of joining with Man- hattan Beach to share some of the legal expenses. Action: Mayor Essertier directed, with the consensus of the Council, that an agenda item come back to Council with a report from the City Manager and the Board's recommendation. He stated that clerical help would be available from the Administrative Aide in General Services. City Council Minutes 07-14-92 Page 7874 (b) Letter from Board of Parking Place Commissioner Jerry Newton dated July 7, 1992 regarding future parking needs. Supplemental memorandum from City Treasurer Gary Brutsch dated July 6, 1992. Action: To appoint Benz to serve on a sub -committee with the Board of Parking Place Commissioners to.con- sider a parking structure on the "old church" site and to invite City Treasurer to attend the meetings. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. So ordered. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINATION OF THE LEGAL USE OF PROPERTY FOR A FIVE (5) UNIT RESIDENCE, RATHER THAN A SIX (6) UNIT RESIDENCE, AT 1150 MANHATTAN AVENUE. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated July 9, 1992. Supplemental information from Frank Wattles dated July 14, 1992. Building and Safety Director William Grove presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:15 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Frank Wattles - Attorney at Law, representing the appellant, questioned why this property was considered illegal; stated that the gas and water pipes were in when the concrete founda- tion was poured, not added later; stated that through 1936 a permit was not needed for con- struction under $50 (roughly a month's salary at that time);. there were no records to show that the sixth unit was not in service prior to 1956 (when it would have become illegal to build a sixth unit); therefor, this should be considered a legal non -conforming unit; and, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, stated that a rumpus room often contained plumbing for a bathroom or kitchen area; stated that during the early 1940s property owners were encouraged to add additional space to house military personnel. The public hearing closed at 8:27 P.M. Proposed Action: To overturn the decision of the Plan- ning Commission, grant the appeal, and allow six units due to the lack of records in the Building Department to prove that there had not been six units on the property at a time prior to 1956 when it would have been legal to have had six units. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Midstokke, Wiemans, and Mayor Essertier. City Council Minutes 07-14-92 Page 7875 Action: To approve the staff recommendation and sustain the Planning Commission, deny the appeal, and adopt Resolution No. 92-5567, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO BE A 5 UNIT RESIDENCE FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS 1150 MANHATTAN AVENUE LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 13, BLOCK. 48, FIRST AD- DITION TO.HERMOSA BEACH TRACT." Motion Mayor Essertier, second Midstokke. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Benz and Edgerton. 6. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 19 "MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC", SECTION 19-61 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, BY ADDING SUBSECTION (m), RELATING TO THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON FRONT YARDS UNLESS PAVED AND LEADING TO A GARAGE. Memo- randum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated June 29, 1992. Supplemental letter from Judy Jackson, 1029 Monterey Blvd, dated July 6, 1992. Supplemental memorandum from Building and Safety Direc- tor William Grove dated July 14, 1992. Acting General Services Director Leroy Staten presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Charles Vose recommended clarifications to the Ordinance and suggested that a procedure be set up for the General Service Officers to follow as this was not the same as ticketing a vehicle for a parking viola- tion on a public street. The public hearing opened at 8:41 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, questioned if, as a misdemeanor, the officer must witness the violation taking place; and, if there is a "No Trespassing" sign posted on the property, would the officer be able to come onto the property to place the ticket. on the vehicle; Helene Frost - 2900 Tennyson Place, addressed the Council on the special problems this Ordinance would cause to residents in her area; asked that the phrase, "... leading to a garage" be taken out; and, Merna Marshall - 33rd Place, agreed with the letter written by Judy Jackson. The public hearing closed at 8:49 P.M. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 92-1073, with the changes recommended by the City Attorney of, "Sec. 19- 61(m) Parking; Residential Property. Residential park- ing on private property within the front twenty (20') feet from the public right of way shall be allowed only upon such area that leads to a garage, is paved, does not exceed the width of the garage and is in accordance City Council Minutes 07-14-92 Page 7876 with and conforming to all codes, ordinances and laws of the City of Hermosa Beach and the State of California pertaining to off-street parking, including, but not limited to, the Zoning Code."; direct staff to come back to Council with the procedure to implement the Ordinance that includes addressing the problem in the Tennyson Place area and a. 60, day. noticing to impacted residents; and, direct staff to request the Presiding Judge of the South Bay Municipal Court to approve the bail schedule for a violation of Section 19-61(m) as $30 for violation and $58 for delinquency. Motion Mayor Essertier, second Wiemans. The motion car- ried, noting the dissenting votes of Benz and Edgerton. Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 92-1073, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 19, OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, "MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC", AR- TICLE IV, SECTION 19-61, BY ADDING SUBSECTION (m), VEHI- CLE PARKING; RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY." Motion Mayor Essertier, second Midstokke. AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Essertier NOES: None 7. REVIEW OF DELINQUENT REFUSE CHARGES FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLACING SAID CHARGES ON THE TAX ROLLS AS A SPECIAL AS- SESSMENT. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated July 6, 1992. Building and Safety Director William Grove presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 9:10 P.M. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item the public hearing was closed at 9:10 P.M. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-5568, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY. OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY ASSESSOR TO INCLUDE DELINQUENT REFUSE BILLS AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO BE COLLECTED AT THE SAME TIME AND IN THE SAME MANNER AS COUNTY TAXES." Motion Wiemans, second Edgerton. The motion carried unanimously. The meeting recessed at 9:11 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:25 P.M. and resumed the normal order of the agenda at item 1. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR MICRO -COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFT- WARE TO OVERBYTE COMPUTER CORPORATION. Memorandum• from City Council Minutes 07-14-92 Page 7877 Computer Systems Manager Marguerite Sturges dated June 17, 1992. (Continued from 6/23/92 meeting.) Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Rob Jones - President of Overbyte Computer Corp., responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to award the bid for micro computer hardware and software, for $47,146.33 (tax included), to Overbyte Computers Cor- poration; noting that as stated in the contract (page 2 of the staff report), the bid prices would hold for six months and the contract could be re-evaluated for the most current pricing meant that the prices could go down. Motion Mayor Essertier, second Midstokke. The motion carried unanimously. - 9. PROPOSAL FOR GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT REORGANIZATION. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated July 9, 1992. Supplemental letter from Janet Dreste submitted July 14, 1992. City Manager Ferrin presented the staff report, showed flow charts, and responded to Council questions. Finance Director Copeland and Personnel Director Black- wood responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Betty Martin - 257 - 27th Street, questioned if there would be additional costs at the Police Department due to increase for dispatch and clerical duties; questioned the remodel costs to handle the public at City Hall for parking and animal permits. City Manager Ferrin responded that the remodel consisted of a new counter that would allow the public to finally have a one-stop area for paying parking tickets (base- ment area); and that Base 3 would still be used to han- dle parking enforcement and animal control dispatch duties. Action: To approve the staff recommendation and au- thorize consolidation of the General Services Department with the Police Department to begin on August 1, 1992. Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Essertier. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Benz and Mid- stokke due to the proposed staff increase in the Finance Department. 10. REQUEST TO APPROVE A CHANGE IN THE PERSONNEL ALLOCATION IN THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT AND CLASS SPECIFICATION FOR City Council Minutes 07,-14-92 Page 7878 FINANCE SUPERVISOR WITH RECOMMENDED SALARY RANGE. Memo- randum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated July 8, 1992. Personnel Director Blackwood responded to Council questions. Proposed Action: To receive and file. Motion Benz. The motion was withdrawn due to the request of City Manager Ferrin to be allowed time to consult with Finance Director Copeland. Action: To continue this item in order to allow staff the time to consult and resubmit. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - None 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Vacancies - Boards and Commissions Board of Public Parking Place Commissioners. Two expiration of terms ending July 27, 1992. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated July 6, 1992. (b) (c) (d) Action: To direct the City Clerk to advertise and request additional applications from interested parties, pursuant to past practice. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered. Notification of absences of Parks, Recreation and Com- munity Resources Commission. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated July 6, 1992. Action: To waive the automatic vacancy for two absences within one calendar quarter for Dani Peirce of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Com- mission, noting; that this should not set a pattern. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered. Notification of absences of Cable TV Board member. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated July 6, 1992. Action: To waive the automatic vacancy for two absences within one calendar quarter for Gerry Schweitzer of the Cable Television Advisory Board, noting that this should not set a pattern. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered. Analysis and report on Records Management Program. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick Ferrin dated July 13, 1992. City Council Minutes 07-14-92 _Page 7879 Action: To continue this item to the regular meeting of July 28, 1992. Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Essertier. So ordered. 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request by Councilmember Edgerton to direct staff to prohibit sale of pornographic newspapers in outdoor news racks. Supplemental letter from Greg Kelsey, President, Hermosa Beach City School Board, dated July 14, 1992. Councilmember Edgerton discussed his request; asked staff to review the current code and return with an agenda item if code was not sufficient to deal with the problem. Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski reported that the problem of "harmful material", as defined by the penal code, had been taken care of; the newsracks in question were not allowed under the zoning code and had been confiscated. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Merna Marshall - 360 - 33rd Place, suggested the staff look at the entire City for this type of material placed in other public areas, as this was not the only location. (b) Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of placing an alternate measure on the November, 1992 ballot as follows: Development of the Biltmore Site consisting of 70% commercial and 30% open space. Councilmember Benz discussed his request; stated that the percentage he had mentioned may not be exact; and, clarified that he. wished the percentage recommended by eight of the eleven members of the Biltmore Task Force to be placed on the ballot. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Merna Marshall - 360 - 33rd Place, requested that the Council not place a competing measure'on this ballot; asked that the 100% Open Space Park measure be allowed to stand alone or Mr. Herriott would be back with another initiative; suggested the Council consider Councilmember Benz' measure at a later election. Proposed Action: To prepare a Council measure encom- passing the Biltmore Task Force majority recommendation for the Biltmore Site for the November 5, 1992 general election. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion failed due to City Council Minutes 07-14-92 Page 7880 (C) the dissenting votes of Midstokke, Wiemans, and Mayor Essertier. Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of elimina- tion or reduction of the parking requirements for busi- nesses, as the parking requirements preclude development for buildings such as Mrs. Gooch's. Councilmember Benz discussed his request. Proposed Action: To request a study of the parking re- quirements for businesses to determine if the require- ments might be reduced. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion was withdrawn due to Planning Director Schubach's response that a study is currently underway as part of the Land Use Ele- ment of the General Plan and should be coming before the Council in August or September of 1992. CITIZEN COMMENTS - None ADJOURNMENT IN MEMORY OF MR. LOGAN COTTON - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, July 14, 1992, at the hour of 11:47 P.M. in memory of Logan Cotton, former Councilmember and Mayor of Hermosa Beach 1930 - 1934, to the regular meeting of July 28, 1992 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. (,t ryC0.r eputy City Cler City Council Minutes 07-14-92 Page 7881 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:07:16 PAY. VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-92 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-92 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-92 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-92 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-92 • H H H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-92 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-92 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-92 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/6-16 TO 6-30-92 ••• VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR Q7/16/92 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00243 001-202-0000-2030 07/01/92 00491 $272,650.14 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00243 105-202-0000-2030 00276 07/01/92 00243 109-202-0000-2030 00074 07/01/92 00243 110-202-0000-2030 07/01/92 00243 145-202-0000-2030 07/01/92 00243 155-202-0000-2030 07/01/92 00243 160-202-0000-2030 07/01/92 00243 170-202-0000-2030 07/01/92 00243 705-202-0000-2030 07/01/92 $8,569.66 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $1,257.20 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00279 $40,828.08 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00271 $2,931.38 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00272 $4,539.56 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00269 $0,210.51 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00126 $24,791.41 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00233 $4,S22.26 /ACCRUED PAYROLL ••s PAY CODE TOTAL R A-1 COAST RENTALS MISC. CHARGES/JUNE 92 ••• VENDOR TOTAL 00029 001-400-6101-4309 46929 06/30/92 PARKS PAGE 0001 DATE 07/16/92 INV/REF PO N CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *368,600.20 *368,600.20 01281 $145.00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R A.P. ELECTRONICS EMERO REPAIR/FOGHORN ••• VENDOR TOTAL $145.00 04165 001-400-4204-4321 00668 $99.90 07/08/92 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS MISC CHARGES/JULY 92 /7039 00857 001-400-2101-4306 07/15/92 POLICE *99.90 41148 $0.00 07/16/92 41148 $0.00 07/16/92 41148 $0.00 07/16/92 41148 $0.00 07/16/92 41148 $0.00 07/16/92 41148 $0.00 07/16/92 41148 $0.00 07/16/92 41148 *0.00 07/16/92 41148 $0.00 07/16/92 146929 00061 $0.00 05216 $0.00 01208 $135.00 7029/7039 00075 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 41364 07/16/92 41365 07/16/92 41366 07/16/92 lb FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:07:16 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 9'/16/92 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT PAGE 0002 DATE 07/16/92 AMOUNT INV/REF PO N CHK N DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL UTILITY RAGS/JUNE 92 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL UTILITY RAGS/JUNE 92 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL UTILITY RAGS/JUNE 92 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL UTILITY RAGS/JUNE 92 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL UTILITY RAGS/JUNE 92 **+ VENDOR TOTAL 00152 001-400-201-4309 06/30/92 , 'FIRE 00152 001-400-3104-4309E 00920 06/30/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00152 001-400-4204-4309 02404 06/30/92 ' BLDG MAINT *135. 00 01336 •59.45 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00152 001-400-4205-4309 00658 06/30/92 EQUIP SERVICE 00152 110-400-3302-4309 00852 06/30/92 'PARKING ENF *81.30 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $304.65 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $93.90 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *24. 00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R AT & T MOBILE PHONE LD/JUN 92 792-0 *** VENDOR TOTAL $563.30 03423 170-400-2103-4304 00054 $3.89 06/30/92 SPEC INVESTOTNS /TELEPHONE R LINDA*BANOS SUMMER PROGRAM REFUND 38994 *** VENDOR TOTAL R BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS MED WASTE DISPOSAL/JUN92 41723 *** VENDOR TOTAL 04726 001-300-0000-3826 04772 07/13/92 $3. 89 $100. 00 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES 04540 001-400-2101-4201 06/30/92 POLICE $1 0 0 . 00 00017 41367 $0.00 07/16/92 00017 41367 *0.00 07/16/92 00017 41367 $0.00 07/16/92 00017 41367 $0.00 07/16/92 00017 41367 *0. 00 07/16/92 500-6792-0 00066 $0.00 41368 07/16/92 38994 04974 41369 *0.00 07/16/92 01064 *41.40 920600-0041723 00075 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES REFUSE LIEN FEES/FY 92 *** VENDOR TOTAL 02076 001-300-0000-3859 06/30/92 $41.40 00082 $5,325.85 /REFUSE LIEN FEE R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY LINE PRINTER RIBBONS 86538 *5, 325. 85 00034 001-400-1206-4305 00565 $76.97 06/24/92 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 41370 07/16/92 04734 41371 $0.00 07/16/92 186538 04008 41372 $76.96 07/16/92 • • • FINANCE-SFA340 • TIME 14:07:16 PAY VENDOR NAME • DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL R LAURIE*BVREN SUMMER PROGRAM REFUND 41938 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/16/92 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 03295 001-300-0000-3826 07/01/92 R CA MUNICIPAL BUS TAX ASSN INC. ANNUAL DUES/FY 92-93 *** VENDOR TOTAL PAGE 0003 DATE 07/16/92 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *76.97 04775 $49.00 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES *49.00 00382 001-400-1207-4316 00101 $40.00 07/06/92 BUS LICENSE /TRAINING R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENT/JUNE 92 R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENT/JUNE 92 *** VENDOR TOTAL *40. 00 00153 001-400-4202-4187 00204 *644.85 06/30/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 00153 110-400-3302-4187 00357 $52.50 06/30/92 PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE R COAST IRRIGATION CO. DISCOUNT OFFERED R COAST IRRIGATION CO. DISCOUNT OFFERED R COAST IRRIGATION CO. SPRINKLER PARTS *** VENDOR TOTAL 36548 36548 36548 00354 001-202-0000-2021 06/30/92 00354 001-202-0000-2022 06/30/92 00354 001-400-6101-4309 06/30/92 PARKS 00245 00241 01280 $697.35 41938 04985 $0.00 04312 *0. 00 41373 07/16/92 41374 07/16/92 00002 41375 $0.00 07/16/92 00002 41375 $0.00 07/16/92 $3.81 35644/36548 04876 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 41376 07/16/92 *3.81CR 35644/36548 04876 41376 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN *0.00 07/16/92 *720.20 35644/36548 04876 41376 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $724.01 07/16/92 R L. N. *CURTIS 1S! SON FIRE PUMP REPAIR KITS 12206 *4* VENDOR TOTAL 00850 001-400-2201-4309 06/23/92 FIRE *720. 20 01335 $200.95 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R DANIEL FREEMAN LAX MED. CLINIC EMPLOYEE.PHYSICALS/JUN92 04971 *200. 95 02390 001-400-1203-4320 00424 $280.00 06/30/92 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS 112206 03455 *190. 95 004971 04651 $0.00 41377 07/16/92 41378 07/16/92 • w FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:07:16 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION www VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/16/92 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ' ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE & SHELTER COSTS/JUNE 92 www VENDOR TOTAL PAGE 0004 DATE 07/16/92 INV/REF PO N CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $280.00 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00190 *358.30 06/30/92 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT R DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION SEISMIC FEES/APR-JUN 92 www VENDOR TOTAL 00049 001-300-0000-3204 06/30/92 *358. 30 02672 $285.04 /BUILDING PERMITS R DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES PUBLICATIONS/PLANNING 39377 www VENDOR TOTAL R DIGITAL COMPUTER R DIGITAL COMPUTER www VENDOR TOTAL $285.04 00440 001-400-410,1-4305 00638 $36.00 06/30/92 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT CORPORATION MAINT/PD/JUL 92 30893 EQUIPMENT CORPORATION MAINT/PD/JUL 92 30893 00269 001-400-2101-4201 01065 07/01/92 POLICE 00269 001-400-2201-4201 00312 07/01/92 FIRE *36.00 00014 *0. 00 41379 07/16/92 04235 41380 $0.00 07/16/92 39377 01985 *36.00 41381 07/16/92 $913.32 340030893 00007 41382 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/16/92 $608.87 340030893 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R DENNISE*ELVISH SUMMER PROGRAM REFUND *** VENDOR TOTAL 04732 001-300-0000-3826 42243 07/09/92 $1,522. 19 04779 $115.00 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES R PENNY*EVANS SUMMER PROGRAM REFUND www VENDOR TOTAL 38988 04728 001-300-0000-3826 07/01/92 *115. 00 04778 $20.00 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES R FRIDEN ALCATEL MAINT/POSTAGE MACH/FY93 *20.00 03998 001-400-1208-4201 00889 *548.00 07/06/92 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00007 41382 $0.00 07/16/92 42243 04973 *0. 00 38988 04995 $0.00 41383 07/16/92 41384 07/16/92 08066 41385 $0.00 07/16/92 • • • • • FINANCE-SFA340 • TIME 14:07:16 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0005 FOR 07/16/92 DATE 07/16/92 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * • DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • R FRIDEN ALCATEL 03998 001-400-1208-4201 00890 •198.00 M609031602A 08066 41385 MAINT/POSTAGE SCALE/FV93 1602A 07/06/92 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/16/92 • •*• VENDOR TOTAL *706.00 R MOLLY J0*GEE 04730 001-300-0000-3826 04776 $94.00 SUMMER PROGRAM REFUND 42072 07/01/92 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL R GLORIA*KEPIRO SUMMER PROGRAM REFUND 41964 07/01/92 *54.00 42072 04987 $0.00 04729 001-300-0000-3826 04777 $94.00 41964 04989 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES $0.00 •** VENDOR TOTAL R LOS ANGELES ZOO TICKETS/SUMMER BLAST **• VENDOR TOTAL $54.00 41386 07/16/92 41387 07/16/92 04690 001-400-4601-4201 01471 $324.29 04958 41388 06/30/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $300.00 07/16/92 $324.25 R MANHATTAN FORD 00605 001-400-2201-4311 00434 $100.04 MISC CHARGES/JULY 92 25742 07/15/92 FIRE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 125742 00746 41389 $0.00 07/16/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL R BRENDAN*MOIR LIGHT TECH/JUL 13. 92 *** VENDOR TOTAL $100.04 04660 001-400-4601-4201 01472 $44.00 04976 41390 07/13/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/16/92 *44. 00 R HOLLY*MORGAN 04731 001-300-0000-3826 04774 $30.00 SUMMER PROGRAM REFUND 4196 07/01/92 41965 04984 41391 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES $0.00 07/16/92 •** VENDOR TOTAL $30.00 R LYNN*PEAVEY COMPANY .04371 001-400-2101-4309 01804 *294.50 FINGERPRINTING SUPPLIES 63683 '06/23/92 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *318.80 63683 3 41392 07/16/92 16/92 0 0 0 0 • • • • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:07:16 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ••• VENDOR TOTAL R PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT ADV/JUNE 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/16/92 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ••• VENDOR TOTAL 4 PAGE 0006 DATE 07/16/92 INV/REF PO N CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *294. 50 00026 . 001-202-0000`-2020 01308 *38,578.35 07/09/92..' ,1 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE R RADIO SHACK MISC CHARGES/JULY 92 89818 R RADIO SHACK MISC CHARGES/JUN 92 79871 ••• VENDOR TOTAL 01429 001-400-4204-4309 02405 07/15/92 BLDG MAINT 01429 001-400-4205-4309 00657 06/30/92 EQUIP SERVICE *38,078.35 *74.53 89903/89818 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *22.82 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R SHORELINE PRINTING POLICE FORMS ••• VENDOR TOTAL •w• *97. 35 03505 001-400-2101-4305 01805 *411.35 9755 07/06/92 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. BUS PASS SALES/MAY 92 R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. BUS PASS SALES/APRIL 92 R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. BUS PASS SALES/JUNE 92 VENDOR TOTAL *411. 35 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00129 *1,051.00 05/31/92 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00130 *1,328.00 04/30/92 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00131 *1,140.00 06/30/92 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT R SO. CAL SHARPSHOOTER, INC. QUAL/PRACTICE SHOOTS/JUN •*• VENDOR TOTAL 02250 001-400-2101-4201 06/30/92 POLICE *3,519.00 01063 *2,718.24 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R SOUTH BAY NOTICING AND MISC CHARGES/JULY 92 ERO7A *2,718. 24 $0. 00 41393 07/16/92 00758 41394 *0.00 07/16/92 79871 00658 41394 *0.00 07/16/92 9755 05040 *411. 35 41395 07/16/92 03398 41396 *0.00 07/16/92 03383 41396 *0.00 07/16/92 05107 41396 *0.00 07/16/92 00668 41397 *0.00 07/16/92 03882 001-400-4101-4201 00154 *230.00 07/09/92 PLANNING 92HERO7A 00764 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 41398 07/16/92 • • • • 1110 FINANCE-SFA340 • TIME 14:07:16 PAY VENDOR NAME • DESCRIPTION • *** VENDOR TOTAL • R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO ELECTRIC BILLS/JUN 92 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/JUN 92 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/JUN 92 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/JUN 92 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/JUN 92 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/JUN 92 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/16/92 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00159 001-400-3101-4303 00218 06/30/92 MEDIANS 00159 001-400-3104-4303 ♦ 00126 06/30/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00584 06/30/92 BLDG MAINT 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00449 06/30/92 PARKS 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00374 06/30/92 STREET LIGHTING 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00203 06/30/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN PAGE 0007 DATE 07/16/92 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *230.00 *50.82 /UTILITIES *84. 40 /UTILITIES *598.64 /UTILITIES *111.88 /UTILITIES $10.90 /UTILITIES *52. 81 /UTILITIES R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ST LITE BILLS/JUNE 92 *** VENDOR TOTAL *909. 45 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00375 *12,248.02 06/30/92 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES R DARLENE*SOWERS SUMMER PROGRAM REFUND 41929 *** VENDOR TOTAL 04727 001-300-0000-3826 07/08/92 *12,248.02 04773 $35.00 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES R STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX DUE/APR-JUN 92 R STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX DUE/APR-JUN 92 R STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX DUE/APR-JUN 92 *35.00 00707 001-400-2101-4305 01806 137.00 06/30/92 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00707 001-400-2101-4306 01209 *131.00 06/30/92 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE .00707 06/30/92 001-400-4601-4308 00724 COMM RESOURCES $3.00 /PROGRAM MATERIALS 00666 41399 *0.00 07/16/92 00666 41399 *0. 00 07/16/92 00666 41399 *0.00 07/16/92 00666 41399 30.00 07/16/92 00666 41399 *0.00 07/16/92 00666 41399 *0.00 07/16/92 00012 10.00 41929 04996 $0.00 41400 07/16/92 41401 07/16/92 00072 41402 *0.00 07/16/92 00072 41402 *0.00 07/16/92 00072 41402 30.00 07/16/92 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 14:07:16 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *0* VENDOR TOTAL R STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION GAS TANK FEE/APR—JUN 92 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/16/92 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0008 DATE 07/16/92 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $171.00 03962 305-400-8601-4201 00032 *65.32 06/30/92 CIP 86-601 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT • R STATE OF CALIFORNIA FINGERPRINT APPS/JUN 92 09252 *** VENDOR TOTAL 00364 001-400-2101-4251 06/30/92 POLICE 00448 *65.32 *108. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT R J. E.*TALLERICO COMPUTER SERV/JUN 92 R J. E.*TALLERICO BUS LIC PROGRAM CHANGES *** VENDOR TOTAL $108. 00 04247 001-400-1206-4201 01008 $666.65 133 06/30/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 04247 001-400-1207-4201 00034 133 06/30/92 BUS LICENSE 04736 41403 $0.00 07/16/92 909252 00023 $0.00 133 04016 $0.00 *120.00 133 04311 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $120.00 R KAREN*THOMAS SUMMER PROGRAM REFUND *0* VENDOR TOTAL *** 04733 001-300-0000-3826 43000 07/13/92 $786.65 04780 $85.00 43000 04975 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES $0.00 R CITY OF*TORRANCE CITY SHARE AREA G/FY93 VENDOR TOTAL $85. 00 00841 001-400-2701-4251 00036 *2,343.13 06427 07/02/92 CIVIL DEFENSE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT R BO*WEBBER WORK GUARANTEE REFUND *** VENDOR TOTAL •** PAY CODE TOTAL *** TOTAL WARRANTS 04049 001-210-0000-2110 32776 06/30/92 $2,343.13 106427 05013 $0.00 04954 $1,600.00 32776 04484 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00 01,600.00 *76, 327. 99 $444,928. 19 1 HEREBY CERTITy THAT THE Dr.MANDS OR CLA THE WARRANIC r COVERED Qy l TrO ON Pn CS rN wr,rmANr RCGv^Irr TON TO cr.uavr• or rHE ruNt,s ANT. nvnn n., /b -� MILE III? I n'(Mf I1r, NIr ^44- rfnr fr> IHE ltd11CCL1111 41404 07/16/92 41405 07/16/92 41405 07/16/92 41406 07/16/92 41407 07/16/92 41408 07/16/92 •i • ur nr:,,n., nn�, • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:01:03 PAY VENDOR NAME. - DESCRIPTION , CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/23/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0001 DATE 07/23/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 001-202-0000-2030 00493 $311,164.00 PAYROLL/JUL 1 TO 15, 92 07/16/92 /ACCRUED PAYROLL *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************************************.** $311,164.00 H H H H H H H H H H H H H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT ADV/JUNE 92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 92 00026 001-202-0000-2020 01310 07/09/92 00026 001-202-0000-2020 07/23/92 00026 001-202-0000-2020 07/23/92 $38,578.35 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 01311 $97,663.87 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 01312 $38, 578. 35CR /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00026 001-202-0000-2020 01313 07/23/92 00026 105-202-0000-2020 00121 07/23/92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 92 00026 109-202-0000-2020 00006 07/23/92 00026 110-202-0000-2020 07/23/92 $67, 515. 90CR /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $1,176.42 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $173. 36 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00194 $4,680.57 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00026 145-202-0000-2020 00109 07/23/92 $223. 95 • /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00026 145-202-0000-2020 00110 07/23/92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 92 00026 145-202-0000-2020 07/23/92 $28. 31 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00111 $17.55 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00026 145-202-0000-2020 00112 07/23/92 00026 155-202-0000-2020 00035 07/23/92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 RETIREMENT/JUNE 92 •07/23/92 • 160-202-0000-2020 00069 $12. 76 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $128. 91 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $979. 31 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 41360 $0.00 07/23/92 $0. 00 41359 07/23/92 41410 $0.00 07/23/92 41410 $0.00 07/23/92 41410 $0.00 07/23/92 41410 $0.00 07/23/92 41410 $0.00 07/23/92 41410 $0.00 07/23/92 41410 $0.00 07/23/92 $0. 00 41410 07/23/92 41410 $0.00 07/23/92 41410 $0. 00 07/23/92 J 0 $0. 00 41410 07/23/92 41410 $0. 00 07/23/92 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:01:03 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ° H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 92 EI PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/23/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00026 170-202-0000-2020 00015 $5,732.26 07/23/92 00026 705-202-0000-2020 07/23/92 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00044 $276.39 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $387.71 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $43.965.47 00026 705-202-0000-2020 4 00045 07/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************************I******** *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** R B. A. T. O. TUITION/J. CARUSO 04748 001-400-2101-4313 07/23/92 POLICE PAGE' 0002 DATE 07/23/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $355.129.47 00406 $86.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $86.00 41410 $0.00 07/23/92 41410 $0.00 07/23/92 41410 $0.00 07/23/92 ' 04568 41413 $0.00 07/23/92 R BANK OF AMERICA 01195 001-400-1141-4201 00117 $2,688.43 1-91102-99999 03865 41414 BANK SERV CHG/JUNE 92 99999 06/30/92 CITY TREASURER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JOEL*BONNEMA SUMMER CLASS REFUND 04746 001-300-0000-3826 P-701 06/30/92 $2,688.43 04844 $8.00 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R R R R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-16 91 01 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-16 91 0 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-16 91 02016 001-400-1122-4305 00150 07/13/92 ELECTIONS 02016 001-400-2101-4305 07/13/92 POLICE $8.00 $10.95 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 01813 $45.87 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 02016 001-400-2101-4310 00366 07/13/92 POLICE GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-16 91 '07/13/92 1 • 001-400-2101-4312 POLICE 01983 $26.50 /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $16.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST SP -701 04998 41415 $0.00 07/23/92 91 01 03866 ,41416 $0.00 07/23/92 91 0 03866 41416 $0.00 07/23/92 91 03866 41416 $0.00 07/23/92 91 03866 $0. 00 41416 ' 07/23/92 1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:01:03 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION * * * R R R R R R R R R R CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/23/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-16 91 07/13/92 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-16 91 07/13/92 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-16 91 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-16 91 02016 07/13/92 02016 07/13/92 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-16 91 07/13/92 001-400-2101-4316 00922 POLICE 001-400-3104-4309 00926 TRAFFIC SAFETY 001-400-4102-4305 00158 PLANNINb COMM 001-400-4202-4316 00244 PUB WKS ADMIN 001-400-4204-4309 02411 BLDG MAINT $36. 00 /TRAINING PAGE 0003 DATE 07/23/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # - AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $40. 00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $5. 68 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $60. 00 /TRAINING $22. 00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS VENDOR TOTAL******************x******************************* ***************** BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CHECK/425 28TH ST. 4339 BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CHECK/316 28TH ST. BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CHECK/2010 MONTEREY 4339 00630 06/26/92 00630 06/26/92 00630 4339 06/26/92 BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CHECK/1042 10TH ST. 4339 00630 06/26/92 BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. 00630 ,PLAN CHECK/122 1ST ST. 4339 06/26/92 001-400-4201-4201 00779 BUILDING 001-400-4201-4201 00780 BUILDING • 001-400-4201-4201 00781 BUILDING 001-400-4201-4201 00782 BUILDING 001-400-4201-4201 00783 BUILDING $263. 00 $154.70 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $514. 54 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $316. 16 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $234. 26 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $423. 54 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,643.20 R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. 00599 001-400-3101-4201 MEDIAN MAINT/JUNE 92 07/20/92 MEDIANS 00115 $3,800.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3,800.00 91 03866 41416 $0.00 07/23/92 91 03866 41416 $0.00 07/23/92 91 03866 41416 $0.00 07/23/92 91 03866 41416 $0.00 07/23/92 91 03866 41416 $0.00 07/23/92 4339 04229 $154. 70 4339 04227 $514. 54 4339 04228 $316.16 4339 04230 $234. 26 4339 04231 $423. 54 00044 $0.00 41417 07/23/92 41417 07/23/92 41417 07/23/92 41417 07/23/92 41417 07/23/92 ,I 41418 07/23/92 R COAST GLASS COMPANY 00325 001-400-4204-4309 02410 $32.48 08020 00616 MISC. CHARGES/JUNE 1992 08020 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 •1 Ii FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15: 01:03 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION , CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/23/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL *************a•n•*****+r ****** **** **•p*******•tt•tr****n•**************#•x•* PAGE 0004 DATE 07/23/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $32. 48 R COOPERS & LYBRAND 03498 001-400-1202-4201 00323 $71.01 AUDIT SERV/FINANCE 07/06/92 FINANCE ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ***,VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R COTKIN & COLLINS LIAR CLAIM/JUNE 1992 42128 04741 705-400-1209-4201 00266 06/30/92 LIABILITY INS R COTKIN & COLLINS 04741 LIAR CLAIM/JUNE 1992 42128 06/30/92 705-400-1209-4324 00271 LIABILITY INS $71. 01 04739 41420 $0.00 07/23/92 $2,208.00 42128 04655 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 $509. 55 /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,717.55 * * * R DATA SAFE TAPE STORAGE/TO 8-11 VENDOR TOTAL 42128 04655 41421 07/23/92 41421 $0.00 07/23/92 00156 001-400-1206-4201 01011 $167.50 63252 00015 41422 63252 07/12/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/23/92 ******************************************************************** R DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPLY 04394 001-400-2101-4306 01212 MISC. CHARGES/JUNE 1992 68964 06/30/92 POLICE $167. 50 $114.03 068964 00622 41423 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $114. 03 R EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 01397 705-400-1215-4186 00101 $1,211.00 932-0339-6 UNEMP CLAIMS/JAN—MAR 92 339-6 07/22/92 UNEMPLOYMENT /UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,211.00 R R R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JUL 92 —0200 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 r 00015 07/23/92 00015 07/01/92 001-400-1101-4304 00481 CITY COUNCIL 001-400-1101-4304 00482 CITY COUNCIL $0.00 07/23/92 04738 41424 $0.00 07/23/92 $7.12 00730 41428 /TELEPHONE $0.00 07/23/92 $6.91 318-0200 00731 4142B /TELEPHONE $0.00 07/23/92 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00536 $20.94 07/23/92 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE 00730 $0. 00 41428 07/23/92 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:01:03 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JUL 92 -0200 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JUL 92 -0200 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/23/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00537 $18.76 07/01/92 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00389 $8.75 07/23/92 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00390 $9.87 07/01/92 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00554 $17.29 07/23/92 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 DIRECT DIAL CROS/JUL 92 -0200 07/01/92 , GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 07/23/92 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JUL 92 -0200 07/01/92 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JUL 92 -0200 07/01/92 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JUL 92 -0200 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/JUN 92 001-400-1141-4304 00555 $18.76 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE 001-400-1201-4304 00594 $14.99 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 001-400-1201-4304 00595 $15.80 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 001-400-1202-4304 00610 $57.27 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00615 $57.71 07/23/92 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00616 $43.52 07/23/92 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00617 $23.70 07/01/92 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00517 $72.36 06/30/92 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 07/23/92 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JUL 92 -0200 001-400-1206-4304 00518 $243.61 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00519 $28.64 07/01/92 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 •07/23/92 I 001-400-1207-4304 00415 $18.62 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE PAGE 0005 DATE 07/23/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 318-0200 00731 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 318-0200 00731 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 318-0200 00731 • $0. 00 41428 07/23/92 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 318-0200 00731 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 318-0200 00731 $0. 00 41428 07/23/92 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 316-0200 00731 $0. 00 41428 07/23/92 00630 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 318-0200 00731 $0. 00 00730 $0. 00 41428 07/23/92 41428 07/23/92 J fa ji S I 10 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:01:03 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION . R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHCS/JUL 92 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JUL 92 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/JUN 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 R ' GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JUL 92 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/JUN 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 07/23/92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JUL 92 -0200 07/01/92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED (DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JUL 92 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JUL 92 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/23/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 07/01/92 00015 07/23/92 00015 07/01/92 001-400-1207-4304 00416 BUS LICENSE 001-400-1208-4304 00230 GEN APPROP 001-400-1208-4304 t 00231 GEN APPROP 00015 001-400-2101-4304 01066 06/30/92 POLICE 00015 001-400-2101-4304 01067 07/23/92 POLICE 00015 001-400-2101-4304 01068 07/01/92 POLICE 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00460 06/30/92 FIRE DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JUL 92 -0200 001-400-2201-4304 00461 FIRE 001-400-2201-4304 00462 FIRE 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00471 07/23/92 ANIMAL CONTROL, 00015 07/01/92 001-400-2401-4304 00472 ANIMAL CONTROL 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00613 07/23/92 PLANNING 00015 07/01/92 001-400-4101-4304 00614 PLANNING 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00549 07/23/92 BUILDING 00015 '.07/01/92 001-400-4201-4304 00550 BUILDING $18. 76 /TELEPHONE $9. 08 /TELEPHONE $9. 87 /TELEPHONE $236. 56 /TELEPHONE $759. 01 /TELEPHONE $370. 28 /TELEPHONE $169. 86 /TELEPHONE $8. 75 /TELEPHONE $9. 87 /TELEPHONE $32. 99 /TELEPHONE $13. 82 /TELEPHONE $65. 19 /TELEPHONE $47. 40 /TELEPHONE $103. 81 /TELEPHONE $76. 03 /TELEPHONE PAGE 0006 DATE 07/23/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 318-0200 00731 $0. 00 41428 ;1..) 07/23/92 I 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 I. 318-0200 00731 41428 1" U $0.00 07/23/92 00630 41428 I "i J $0.00 07/23/92 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 318-0200 00731 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 00630 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 1 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 318-0200 00731 $0. 00 41428 07/23/92 r 00730 41428 0 $0.00 07/23/92 318-0200 00731 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 318-0200 00731 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 318-0200 00731 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 '• FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:01:03 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION . R. R R R R R R R R R R i. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************-************** GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JUL 92 -0200 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JUL 92 -0200 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 ' CITY OF IIERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/23/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 07/23/92 00015 07/01/92 001-400-4202-4304 00649 $292. 85 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE 001-400-4202-4304 00650 $104.67 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE PAGE 0007 DATE 07/23/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 318-0200 00731 00015 001-400-4204-4321 00670 $24.11 07/23/92 BLDG MAnNT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00708 $46.24 07/23/92 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 00015 07/01/92 001-400-4601-4304 00709 $28. 64 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00437 $8.75 07/23/92 PARKS /TELEPHONE GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 DIRECT DIAL CHGS/JUL 92 -0200 07/01/92 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHCS/JUL 92 -0200 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHRGS/JULY 92 001-400-6101-4304 00438 $9.87 PARKS /TELEPHONE 00015 109-400-3301-4304 00054 $10.00 07/23/92 VEH PKG DIST /TELEPHONE 00015 • 110-400-3302-4304 00616 $238.24 07/23/92 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00617 $118.50 07/01/92 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE 00015 145-400-3401-4304 00118 $4.16 07/23/92 DIAL A RIDE /TELEPHONE R FRANK B. *HALL & CO. OF CALIF. EMPLOYEE BLANKET BOND $3,501.93 41428 $0. 00 07/23/92 �.. 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 00730 41428 $0. 00 07/23/92 318-0200 00731 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 318-0200 00731 $0. 00 41428 07/23/92 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 318-0200 00001 41428 $0. 00 07/23/92 00730 41428 $0.00 07/23/92 03147 705-400-1210-4201 00096 $1,617.00 04658 06/03/92 AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R IDENTI-KIT COMPANY, INC. 00204 001-400-2101-4201 I . KIT RENTAL/FY 93 26375 .07/01/92 POLICE $1,617.00 01071 $441.66 99026375 05017 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 41429 07/23/92 41430 07/23/92 O. : FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:01:03 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/23/92 PAGE 0008 DATE 07/23/92 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION . DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************************************aril*** $441.66 R JOHNSON & VORWERCK 04740 705-400-1209-4201 00267 $1,147.50 04653 41431 LIAR CLAIM/JUNE 1992 07/07/92 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/23/92 ***'VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1, 147. 50 R LA PLAYITA 04750 001-210-0000-2110 04963 $250.00 32245 04485 41432 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 07/23/92 BANNER DEPOSIT REFUND 32245 07/16/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R . LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. PARKS MAINT/JUNE 1992 04303 001-400-6101-4201 00285 07/20/92 PARKS $250. 00 $7,685.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * $7, 685. 50 R LOS CANCIONEROS MASTER CHORALE 02933 001-210-0000-2110 04962 $500.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/92 R LOS CANCIONEROS MASTER CHORALE 02933 001-300-0000-3406 00509 $160.00 THEATRE RENT REFUND 06/30/92 VENDOR TOTAL /COMM CTR THEATRE ******************************************************************** • $660.00 00073 41433 $0.00 07/23/92 04487 41434 $0.00 07/23/92 05301 41434 $0.00 07/23/92 R MARKON COMPUTER SCIENCE, INC. 02985 001-400-1206-4201 01010 $984.99 0010612 00045 41435 IDIABLO PRINTR/APR—JUN 92 10612 07/13/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $984.99 R MASTER K-9 03120 001-400-2101-4316 00921 $260.00 K-9 TRAINING/MAR—JUN 92 283 06/15/92 210005 POLICE /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $260. 00 R MONARCH BROOM STREET SWEEPER PARTS 00084 001-400-3103-4309 01397 $3,745.45 8817 .06/29/92 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 07/23/92 283 05022 41436 $0.00 07/23/92 8817 04886 41437 $3,745.45 07/23/92 ! • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:01:03 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/23/92 PAGE 0009 DATE 07/23/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3,745.45 • R GEORGE*MORRIS 04743 001-300-0000-3418 00505 $25.00 SUMMER CLASS REFUND 06/30/92 /SPECIAL EVENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** C R NATIONAL IMAGE BANNER DEPOSIT REFUND 04747 001-210-0000-2110 07/09/92 $25. 00 04961 $250.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $250. 00 R OLIVER, BARR & VOSE LEGAL SERV/JUN 92 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00733 ' $9,608.75 06/30/92 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $9, 608. 75 R PHOENIX GROUP 02530 110-400-3302-4201 00353 $2,210.56 6022-00 OUT OF STATE CITES/JUN92 22-00 07/16/92 PARKING ENF /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • R 4; *** R $2, 210. 56 SYLVIA*ROOT 04061 001-400-4102-4201 00365 $215.50 S.E.C. SERV/JULY 1992 707 07/13/92 PLANNING COMM, /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $215. 50 MARC*SARIN 04749 705-400-1209-4324 00272 $996.74 LIAR CLAIM/JULY 92 1 014 07/23/92 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS . *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $996. 74 R MICHAEL*SCHUDACH 00536 001-400-4102-4305 00159 $19.18 MONTHLY EXPENSE/JULY 92 07/13/92 PLANNING COMM /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT PRISONER BOOKING FEE/MAR 41441 00151 001-400-2101-4251 07/10/92 POLICE $19. 18 00451 $114.66 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT u 04971 41438 $0.00 07/23/92 04486 41439 $0.00 07/23/92 02155 41440 $0.00 07/23/92 00063 41441 $0.00 07/23/92 707 01989 41442 $0.00 07/23/92 91 014 04654 , 41443 $0.00 07/23/92 01988 41444 $0.00 07/23/92 41441 00035 41445 $0.00 07/23/92 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:01:03 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/23/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY MISC. CHARGES/JUNE 1992 49539 PAGE 0010 DATE 07/23/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $114.66 00114 001-400-4601-4308 00727 $43.96 06/26/92 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************************,************ R SOUTH BAY CYCLES $43.96 04742 001-400-2101-4311 01461 $92.01 EMERG/MOTORCYCLE REPAIR 1128 06/27/92 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER MISC CHARGES/JUL 92 R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER MISC CHARGES/JUL 92 R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER MISC CHARGES/JUL 92 $92. 01 00113 001-400-2101-4309 00533 $17.87 07/15/92 POLICE 00113 001-400-2201-4309 07/15/92 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01339 $9.75 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00113 001-400-3103-4309 01399 07/15/92 ST MAINTENANCE $9.75 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL BLOOD ALCOHOL TESTING 00107 001-400-2101-4201 06/30/92 POLICE R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL 00107 (BLOOD ALCOHOL TESTING 07/23/92 001-400-2101-4201 POLICE $37.37 01069 $287.75 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 01070 $100.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 110-300-0000-3302 CITE SURCHARGE/JUNE 92 06/30/92 $388.25 46632 $27,976.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************4********************* ,,..•., , . , �.... R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITE COURT DATES/JUN 92 00400 110-300-0000-3302 07/23/92 $27, 976. 00 46633 $535.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING i 149539 00662 41446 $0.00 07/23/92 1128 05019 41447 $0.00 07/23/92 00763 41448 $0.00 07/23/92 00003 41448 $0.00 07/23/92 00763 41448 $0.00 07/23/92 05018 41449 $0.00 07/23/92 00107 41449 $0.00 07/23/92 04741 41450 $0.00 07/23/92 05115 41451 $0.00 07/23/92 I• I•I I .i FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:01:03 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 07/23/92 PAGE 0011 DATE 07/23/92 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $535. 00 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS 00018 001-400-3103-4309 01398 $15.00 7846 00665 41452 MISC. CHARGES/JUNE 1992 7846 06/30/92 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 07/23/92 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS 00018 001-400-3104-4309 00925 $15.00 7846 00665 41452 MISC. CHARGES/JUNE 1992 7846 06/30/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 07/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $30. 00 R SUSAN*SULLIVAN 04745 001-300-0000-3826 04842 $30.00 A222 04997 41453 SUMMER CLASS REFUND A222 06/30/92 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES $0.00 07/23/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $30. 00 * * * * * * R DIANE*TERASAKI 04744 001-300-0000-3826 04843 $30.00 SUMMER CLASS REFUND A222 06/30/92 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $30. 00 R CITY OF*TORRANCE 00841 001-400-2101-4251 00450 $10.50 PRISONER ID CHG/JUNE 92 06513 07/10/92 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** *** TOTAL WARRANTS****************************************************************** $10. 50 $75,709.71 $430,839.18 A222 04977 $0.00 41454 07/23/92 106513 00068 41455 $0.00 07/23/92 *J I, •j.� • .!O I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LISTE.D'ON PA,:S TO ARE ACCIVE,URATE, OFE, THE •. WARRANT REGISTER FOR � CJ FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE D GET; �. BY FINANCE DIREC OY R DATE % 9� • :Y)9 July 23, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of July 28, 1992 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS August 11, 1992 Plaque of appreciation for Planning Commissioner Ketz Traffic Engineering Program, CIP 90-151, award of professional services agreement Quarterly update of Goals Implementation Program Adoption of ordinance re. front yard parking and procedure for implementing same Public Works Department City Manager General Services Dept. Approval of relocation of west end of Gould Terrace Public Works Department Recommendation regarding re-evaluation of Public Information Program General Services Dept. CIP 85-137 - Valley Ardmore overlay accept as complete Public Works Department Report re. Cable TV renewal City Mgr./Comm. Res.Dir. Renewal of contract w/GTE for commissions from public payphones on City property General Services Dept. Amendment of HBMC 17-5 to clearly define current policy of requiring that all outstanding permits are closed, and that the property pass a building and fire inspection prior to the issuance of a business license. Building Director Hope Chapel Lease renewal (Rms. 5, 6A) Community Resources Dir. Resolution to adopt the 1992-93 appropriation limit and amend Reso. 85-4950 to correct the 1986-87 limit Finance Director - 1 - lc Public Hearing Appeal of decision denying variance on property at 336 The Strand Hearing Vehicle Parking on Beach Drive September 8, 1992 Proclamation for Coastweeks Approval of Land Use Element Association for Retarded Citizens lease renewal (Rm. 1, 2, 15) South Bay Hospital District renewal (Rm 9) Easter Seals lease renewal (Rms. 16, 17) December, 1992 lease Planning Director Public Works Department Planning Director Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Project Touch lease renewal (Rm.C) Community Resources Dir. ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Caltrans utility maintenance agrmt. Historic Preservation Ordinance (with Land Use Element) Public Works Director Planning Director ***************************************************************** Initiated by Party Date Council 5/8/90 Re. oil project CUP - define "temporary" as relates to height of project , Planning Director Goal 4 5/16/90 Options to computerize per- sonnel as part of payroll function Finance Director Council 8/14/90 Review of standard CUP conditions Planning Dir. Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Public Works Dir. City Mgr.2/21/91 RFP for computer system Data Processing Council 3/12/91 South School Conceptual design Community Resources Council 6/6/91 Review Bldg/Zoning Code changes to improve liveability Planning Director Staff 7/25/91 Adjustment of Park Tax Building Director Council 8/27 Revision of allowable uses in open space zone Planning Council 9/24/91 Effect of nonconforming ordinance on damaged structures Planning Dept. Report on productivity incentives for employees (GIP) Personnel Director N• Participate w/school civics program coordinator (GIP) Personnel Director Statistical survey - requested at 4/23/91 meeting Council 5/26/92 Revision of City Code provisions pertaining to the construction of public street improve- ments (Public Hearing) Public Works Department City Mgr. 7/23 Revised street sweeping schedule and coordination of street sweeping with trash pickup days Public Works Department 3 July 23, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of July 28, 1992 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS JUNE 1992 Preliminary reports for June 1992 will be submitted on August 11, 1992. Year end accounting procedures require many adjusting entries in order to be in conformance with GAAP (Generally Ac- cepted Accounting Procedures), however, by the next meeting, an estimate of our final revenue and expenditures should be avail- able. The financial statements produced in conjunction with the audit serve as the final report to the City Council for fiscal year 1991-92. The City Council will, however, be updated on actual fund balances after all closing entries have been made. Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager iki Co eland Finance Director 1 d (<) FUND GENERAL NUMBER ACCOUNT 6/1/92 BALANCE TREASURER'S REPORT - JUNE 1992 CASH ADJUSTMENTS WARRANTS ADJUSTMENTS 6/30/92 BALANCE 001 105 109 110 115 120 125 126 127 145 150 155 160 170 180 305 705 GENERAL LIGHTING DISTRICT VEHICLE PARKING DIST. PARKING STATE GAS TAX COUNTY GAS TAX PARK REC.FAC.TAX RAILROAD RT.OF WAY 67. UTILITY USERS TAX PROPOSITION A FUND GRANT FUND CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT SEWER MAINTENANCE POLICE ASSET SEIZURE FIRE PROTECTION FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SELF INSURANCE FUND $3,066,996.01 $1,453,879.37 $215,625.84 $52,459.73 $570,625.85 $10,862.10 $66,487.39 $1,324,565.87 $295,242.50 $197,805.44 $48,313.11 $72,249.21 $1,812,731.65 $1,438,030.55 $509,125.85 $1,543,198.60 $525,468.50 $545,957.67 ($798.24) $16,369.31 $231,037.84 $57,087.45 $0.00 $20,792.00 $88,394.10 $125,139.78 $22,054.00 $8,399.35 $0.00 $8,762.28 $39,018.38 $8,573.00 $0.00 $0.00 $153,976.70 $6,359.16 $941.39 $996.94 $2,484.25 $47.29 $289.46 $2,807.08 $1,285.36 $1,268.20 $0.00 $316.31 $74,581.05 $6,264.03 $2,216.51 $292,387.85 $76,121.05 ($762,021.78) ($23,332.28) ($5,945.31) ($49,092.14) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($2,758.72) $0.00 ($4,977.88) ($8,630.32) ($77,426.94) $0.00 ($796.55) ($24,929.64) ($105,411.68) ($2,887.66) ($1,823.80) ($80,170.10) ($166,875.40) ($2,903.42) ($23,432.08) $0.00 ($101,666.00) ($2,225.06) ($3,333.33) ($222.00) ($112,670.91) ($4,737.44) $0.00 $0.00 ($60.55) $2,899,496.92 $1,433,220.35 $225,167.43 $155,232.27 $463,322.15 $8,005.97 $64,136.77 $1,415,767.05 $320,001.64 $216,143.86 $53,379.13 $67,365.64 $1,774,773.75 $1,401,148.58 $519,915.36 $1,834,789.90 $576,599.36 $13,203,667.57 $1,170,786.92 $622,342.63 ($959,911.56) TRUST ACCOUNTS BALANCE RECEIVED PAID BALANCE $2,913.44 $11,501,568.50 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $1,355,139.75 $537,740.54 INACTIVE DEPOSIT HELD BY FISCAL AGENT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY $869,800.01 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE $632,921.39 $633,210.96 $2,623.87 ($608,419.43) $13,428,466.13 GENERAL PAYROLL OUTSTANDING CHECKS INACTIVE DEPOSIT BALANCE 1../ Aril A -1/0 /A? GARY L. BRUTSC JULY 22, 1992 , CITY TREASURER $585,835.39 $3,967.56 $589,802.95 $15,421.20 $574,381.75 $12,856,708.25 $13,431,090.00 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 21, 1992 Regular Meeting of July 28, 1992 FOURTH QUARTERLY REPORT OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 1991-1992 Recommendation : It is recommended that the City Council Receive and file this report. Background: On June 25, 1991, the City.Council.-adopted -the amended FY 91-92 Capital Improvement Program This is.the-fourth quarterly :status 7 -- report for fiscal year 1991-92. There are 28 projects totaling $5,798,683 in budgeted expenditures. Analysis: =__ The report is organized to show the following for each project: - Project description - Project status as of June 30,1992 - Approved budget - Encumbered funds as of June_30, 1992 - CIP budget page numbers Respectfully submitted, ynn A. Terry Deputy City Engineer pworks/ciprept Concur: William Grove, Acting Director of Public Works Frederick R. Ferrin - City Manager le CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. The Capital Improvement Program (hereafter referred to as CIP) is a planning tool for short and long-range infrastructure improvement and development. It links Hermosa Beach's General Plan and the fiscal planning process to physical development and the highest priority maintenance needs of the City's facilities and infrastructure. It provides the mechanism for estimating capital requirements, identifying appropriate funding sources, scheduling all capital projects over a fixed period, coordinating the activities of various departments to meet completion target dates, and monitoring: and evaluating.. the progress of capital projects. The CIP is a five year plan of capital related revenues and expenditures that is updated one year at a time. Although the CIP constitutes a five year plan, funds are appropriatedonlyfor.:the-upcoming year. ..The CIP.... (starting with FY 89-90) is designed to be on -going -and continuous. ----The --.-.-- projects for the following four years are based on future needs and revenues, not appropriations. This plan consists of projects that are major expenditures for a specific plan or design of permanent public.. improvements such as a - building, street, sanitary sewer rehabilitation, acquisition of real property, or major equipment. The purpose oftheseprojects is to:- - Implement the General Plan - Preserve public health and safety - Improve the environment - Increase efficient operation of the City. - Improve the comfort andenjoymentofresidents The capital projects included in this document are for the Fiscal Year 1991-1992. The Capital Improvement Program funding for last year (FY 90-91) was $4.1 million and the funding for this year (FY 91-92), is $5.8 million. Projects are presented in this document- in seven categories andare organized into the following groups:- .. - Street and Safety --Improvements. - Street Lighting Improvements - - Storm Drain Improvements - Park Improvements - Public Buildings and Grounds Improvements - General Capital Improvements. Summary: This Capital Improvement Program provides a framework for planning, operation and maintenance as well as replacement of existing capital equipment and facilities. The programisintended to address the highest City priorities -for: improvement and maintenance of the City's. infrastructure while reflecting citizens' needsandwishes with regard to shaping their community. CIP 85-137 Description: Status: PROJECT STATUS AS OF JUNE 30, 1992 STREET AND. SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS FEDERAL AID URBAN (FAU) STREET FUNDS OVERLAY OF VALLEY, ARDMORE AND PROSPECT This project is for the resurfacing of the full length of Valley Drive and Ardmore_: Avenue,.._land:.:Prospect-: Avenue. -_south._--: of Aviation Boulevard:-_-_-_.__,.. ALL CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED,EXCEPT STRIPING. - (1) On September 25,.1990, -the -City Councilentered into := an agreement with L.A.:-County for the overlay --project. (2) The County completed the design and advertised for bids on January 22, 1991. (3) The contract was awarded by the County.on-_February 19, 1991 to the Shawnan Corporation in the amount _:of. - $609,312. (4) The contractor started work on June 17, 1991. (5) The construction work on thecontract was completed._. December 6, 1991, excluding the striping. (6) The striping was completed in January, 1992. However, the contractor is having problems with the striping material and this last item of the contract has not been accepted by the County. The next meeting between the County and the Contractor is set for July 29, 1992. (7) The County administration and inspection: costs are estimated to be an additional 35%. They have not been calculated yet by the County. FY 91-92 Budget: Outside Funded from County: City Funded: City $ 526,000 $ 635,067 Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through.6/30/92: $ 635,038 CIP Budget Page: 42 CIP 89-141 STREET REHABILITATION Description: This project is to rehabilitate asphalt concrete and portland cement concrete streets, City-wide. Status: ON HOLD. On September 25, 1990, Council reviewed the pavement management system report which evaluated the condition of all City streets. The Public Works staff prepared a proposed 5 -year schedule of street improvements in compliance with that report. It appears that the budgeted funds for this Fiscal Year may be needed to.. __.. complete the above overlay project, CIP 85-137; thus this project is still on hold. $68,647.has already been transferred. In 1991 the following streets were targeted for: rehabilitation in order -of priority based on the Management System (PMS) report: STREET 1. 5th St from PCH to Prospect Av 2. Gentry St from 5th St to 3rd St 3. Rhodes St from N. end to 18thSt 4. 15th St from Prospect to Harper 5. 1st St from PCH to Prospect Av 6. 19th St from PCH to Rhodes St 7. 6th St from Reynolds St to PCH 8. Ocean Dr from 15th P1 to 8th St 9. 7th P1 from Prospect Av to Reynolds 10. 8th St from Hermosa Av to PCH. 11. 16th Ct from Beach Dr to Hermosa Av 12. Morningside Dr from 26th St to 33rd St 13. Ingleside Dr from 28th St to Longfellow 14. 24th P1 from Ardmore Av to E. end 15. Bard St from 8th St to N. end 16. 30th P1 from Morningside to W. end Pavement PMS SUGGESTED REHAB Reconstruction Reconstruction: Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Fy 91-92 Budget: . City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92 (Transferred to CIP 85-137) CIP Budget Page: 44 CIP 89-142 SIDEWALK REPAIRS Overlay Overlay Overlay Overlay Overlay Overlay Slurry Slurry $ 224,211 $ 68,647 Description: This project is to repair deteriorated sidewalks, driveways and curbs at various locations City-wide for safety reasons. Status: COMPLETED. The City has completed the contract on this -- project. The specifications for this year were prepared -: by City staff and were approved by City Council on August 13, 1991. The contract was awarded on October 8, 1991. - 3 - The contract was awarded to Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. at a contract cost of $33,500. Construction started on November 1, 1991, and was completed on November 27, 1991. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92 CIP Budget page: 46 CIP 90-144 REPLACE STRAND WALL AND WALKWAY Description: Preparation of plans & specifications for the following: (1) remove and replace the entire Strand wall along the bikeway from the southern City border to 24th Street; (2) remove and replace the Strand walkway from the southern City border to 9th Street and from 15th Street to 24th Street; (3) re -pave the bike path adjacent to Hermosa. Avenue from 24th Street to 35th Street; WW1 (4) the extension of the bike path from 35th Street to connect with the bike path in Manhattan Beach. $ 35,000 $ 33,703 Status: IN PROGRESS. During FY 89-90,staff applied to LACTC to. obtain funding through .TDA, .Article 3, Bicycle and Pedestrian facilities. The City received funding of _ $446,000. In FY 90-91 the City received funding in the amount of $405,656 from LACTC. This grant, when added to the $446,00 already received and $200,000.due in FY 1991-92, will be used to repair the Strand pedestrian and bike path. Staff is preparing the engineering plans for this project which were reviewed by Council during the third quarter. Construction is scheduled to begin by the end of November, 1992 FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92 CIP Budget Page: 48 CIP 89-146 STREET MEDIAN UPGRADES-= $ 845,011 $ 8,391 Description: This project proposes new landscaping, plantings and irrigation for street medians at various locations, City-wide. Status: ON HOLD. City street maintenance personnel have been working on other projects and have not been able to schedule this work. - FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92 CIP Budget Page: 52 $ 5,000 $ -0- CIP 89-150 MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS Description: This project is to install the following: 1. Relocation of an existing pedestrian crossing at the Valley School parking lot to a new signalized location in front of the school. This change was requested by the School District to allow school children and pedestrians to cross in a safer manner. 2. New traffic signal on Pier Avenue allowing egress and ingress for Fire Department emergency vehicles. Status: 1. COMPLETED. The County contractor for CIP 89-137 has reconstructed the pathway on the Greenbelt at no cost to the City. The City has installed the pedestrian crossing signal. 2. IN PROGRESS. The City Traffic Engineer still has safety concerns 'about the safe placement and operation of a fire truck activated signal. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92 $ 20,000 $ 14,201 CIP Budget Page: 58 CIP 89-151 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING PROGRAM Description: This project is to provide the following: 1. Develop a high accident location and surveillance program using traffic accident data. 2. Conduct a study and develop a detailed residential neighborhood traffic control plan to reduce commuter traffic intrusion. Status: IN PROGRESS. A Grant application was submitted to the State for project funding. The Council approved an agreement with the State for a $40,000 project on March 12th, 1991. A Request for Proposals was prepared in accordance with the Council policy regarding professional services. The State has notified the City that the Grant funds are available. A request to award the contract will go to the City Council the first quarter of FY 1992-93. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92 CIP Budget Page: 60 $ 40,000 $ -0- CIP 91-165 BIKEWAY PATH REPAIRS Description: The funding for this project allows for the following: - Preliminary engineering leading to construction - Right-of-way acquisition - Construction and reconstruction - Repair and maintenance (off street bikeways only) - Purchase & installation of features such as benches, drinking fountains, and bicycle racks. Status: IN PROGRESS. This project is combined with the Strand reconstruction project. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92 CIP Budget Page: 62 $ 17,545 $ -0- CIP 89-170 SLURRY SEALING Description: This project provided slurry sealing on asphalt surfaced streets west of Valley Drive. The purpose of the slurry seal is to increase skid resistance and prolong pavement life. The work included crack sealing and spot repairs before the slurry sealing. Status: COMPLETED. The slurry seal contract was awarded by the City on March 26, 1991. Asphalt Maintenance Company of California had the contract to perform the work at a cost not to exceed $300,000. Inspection and contract administration were performed by Tierra Engineering Company at a cost not to exceed $22,342. Funding for the project was 100% from the State Gas Tax Fund. The contractor started work on May 31, 1991 and completed work on August 22, 1991. FY 90-91 and FY 91-92 Total Project construction funds spent: $ 299,968 Total project inspection funds spent: $ 22,343 Other Project costs: $ 8,112 TOTAL COSTS: $ 330,422 FY 91-92 FY 91-92 rivaget: $ 229,321 City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92 $ 228,735 CIP Budget Page: 64 6 TRAFFIC CONTROL -PRE-EMPTION Description: This project is to install traffic control pre-emption devices on all PCH signals at the following intersections: 2nd Street Aviation Blvd. 5th Street 8th Street Pier Avenue 21st Street Status: COMPLETED. -•--- On December -13 , :. 1990, :.the South - Bay .,_Hospital District agreed to pay :.one half of the total : cost : of :-.a -:not --. -: exceed amount of $70,000. Staff submitted plans and --: specifications to Caltrans__.in May, 1991_for.encroachment -.: permit approval. The -.City--received permit:,approval--fr-om ._-:. Caltrans on August 21,.:1991.: -The :City -has -: received $35,000 in funds from the Hospital District. The project began construction April 27,-.1992 and work was completed on June 11, 1992. FY 91-92 Proposed Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92 CIP Budget Page: 66 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS' CIP 88-201 STREET:LIGHT UPGRADES $ 70,468 $ 26,721 Description: This project proposes the installation, upgrading and conversion to high pressure sodium lights throughout the_-:.._-_. remaining areas of the City where this improvement has not alreadytaken place.__. Status: IN PROGRESS. The staff has ordered new style lights to be installed on the north end of Hermosa Avenue. FY 91-92 Budget City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92 CIP Budget Page: : 70 SEWERS/STORM DRAINS:: - $ 22,000 $ 9,400. CIP 90-301 MISCELLANEOUS STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS Description: This project proposes to repair or modify existing storm drains within the. City. Status: IN PROGRESS. Staff has started making an identification and condition assessment of the existing facilities. Any repair or modification work is to be implemented next. year. FY 91-92 Proposed Cost: _._. City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92 CIP Budget Page: -72 - 7 - $ 50,000 (unfunded) $ -0- P .__8..8.-406 SANITARY-- SEWER IMPROVEMENTS; -..'TARGET. AREA`: -4= ='= Description: Construction and completion of deficiencies in the sanitary sewers of Target Area 4. This area contains the last locations indicated as priority No. 1 within the Santina & Thompson report. Status: COMPLETED. On December 11, 1990, City Council awarded a 180 calendar day construction --contract to Colich and Sons in the amount of $1,587,648.. The inspection contract was awarded to BSI at a cost not to exceed $62,320 (based on 120 days). That amount was increased to $92,750.(based-on 180 days) by the City :Council °on:August 13; 1991: Approximately 11,800 -feet- of -: sanitary :.sewer -was ~_;_• , rehabilitated at 18 separate locations in the City. Approximately 50% of the sewer was replaced with new. -clay.:. pipe. The remaining 50% was -linedwith polyethelyne:..-__ liner. The project was funded primarily through the 6%`_ Utility Users Tax Fund. Construction work started on March 8, 1991 and was completed on October 31, 1991. The total construction cost of-$1,441,657.98.was _$145,990.02. - under budgeted construction: _costs. __During the first few -.: months of the contract, the City experienced failure --in: three (3) of the locations scheduled for... rehabilitation. Final payment has been made to the construction'contractor:- and to the inspection contractor. FY 91-92 Budget: $1,148,806 City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92 $ 816,600 CIP Budget Page: .7.4 • PARK IMPROVEMENTS CIP 89-506 VARIOUS PARK IMPROVEMENTS Description: The improvements include new -tree planting, benches, landscaping, irrigation,playground equipment, picnic tables, etc. recommended improvement -locations are to be determined by the Community. Resources Commission Status: IN PROGRESS. The following projects have been completed: 1. $1,000 for storage shed; installation is to take place after environmental review. 2. Roofing for the 6th and Prospecthistorical school building. -_. 3. Repair of the walls and ceiling for the 6th and Prospect school building. .. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92 CIP Budget Page: 78.. 8 $ 20,000 CIP 88-508 PARK IRRIGATION REHABILITATION Description: Restoration of various City Park irrigation systems. Status: IN PROGRESS. Existing systems have been evaluated and the field work is scheduled to begin in FY 1992-93. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92 CIP Budget Page: 80 CIP 89-509 TENNIS COURTS RESURFACING $ 66,000 $ -0- Description: This project proposes to resurface the six tennis courts -. at the Community Center. Existing cracks would be filled and an acrylic coatingwould-be applied .to=.the ..playing_:-:: surface. .:- ... Status: ON HOLD. Deferred to avoid any conflict with City Yard relocation. FY 91-92 Proposed Cost: .:_..:. City Encumbered Funds .7/1/91 through .6/30/92: CIP Budget Page: 82 CIP 89-510 IMPLEMENTATION OF PARK MASTER PLAN $ 20,000 (unfunded) $ -0- Description: This project proposes to :imnplement the Park MasterPlan by- -:=-. adding new plantings, benches, landscaping, trash cans, signage, etc. as approved by City Council as well as other recommendations from the PRCRAC. Status: ON HOLD. This project was placed on -hold pending the outcome of the South School acquisition costs.. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92: CIP Budget Page: 84 $ -0- (unfunded) $ -0- CIP 90-511 RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PARKING LOT Description: Install a tree -lined and landscaped parking lot on the railroad right-of-way area between Valley & Ardmore across from City Hall. The design to emphasize the Greenbelt theme and the pedestrian path.._: _... Status: CANCELLED. The conceptual design was under study and five colored renderings were sent to the _Parks Commission__._.. - 9 - for input and review. The conceptual designs were also reviewed by the Planning Commission. However, the City Council has canceled the project. Staff has been worked with the West Basin Municipal Water District to propose the best type of landscaping and to reduce water irrigation needs for this area. The area is now proposed for landscaping only in FY 1992-93. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92: CIP Budget Page: 86 $ 111,500 $ -0- CIP 89-513 DEVELOPMENT OF 5__:_LOTS ADJACENT :TO -EDITH RODAWAY:' PARK*-, Description: This project is to develop 5 lots adjacent to Edith...: Rodaway Park. The existing parkislocated between _Gentry-. Street and Hollowell: Avenue on the north ..side .of=:Prospect -.. Avenue. The park is to be expanded to include the adjacent vacant lots. Status: IN PROGRESS. Escrow :closed- on this project on -March -15, 1991. The following activities have been identified as the development phase started in FY 1991-92 and to be - completed during the 1992-93 fiscal year. 1. Topographic survey of additional park area -. DONE - 2. Design of recreational use areas - IN PROGRESS 3. Grading of site 4. Installation of irrigation system 5. Installation of fencing . _ :.._ _. _ _ 6. Planting of trees, shrubsandgrass_... -__ 7. Purchase of table and installation of picnic areas 8. Opening of park addition to the public FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 -through 6/30/92: CIP Budget Page:: 88__. CIP 89-515 PURCHASE SOUTH SCHOOL $ 50,000 $ -0- Description: The project is to purchase school property located 300 feet south of 6th Street and west of Valley Drive. This site was one of two proposed sites for the new Public Works Yard. Status: COMPLETED. The propertywas surveyed and the Record of Survey Map was submitted to the Los Angeles County Surveyor in December, 1991. TheCitystaff reviewed the preliminary title report and escrow closed on January 10, 1992. FY 91-92 Budget: - City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92: CIP Budget Page:_. 92 ._ . - 10 - $2,342,854 $2,342,854 PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND -GROUNDS CIP 89-604 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS Description: This project proposes rehabilitation of the wooden floors at the following locations: 1. Clark Building floor 2. Community Center gym floor 3. Community Center stage floor Status: ON HOLD. Staff has prepared a bid package for the subject work at the above locations. However, the work has been put on hold by the City Council due to other budget needs. FY 91-92. Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91:_: through 6/30/92- .CIP Budget Page: 98_ CIP 91-608 CITY YARD RELOCATION $ 488 $ 488 Description: This project proposes -the--relocation of the Public Works maintenance yard inanticipationof oil drilling. This project does not include the cost of -land acquisition. Status: ON HOLD. On September 25, 1990, Council awarded a feasibility study to Anthony/Langford to analyze two proposed Public Works Yard relocation sites, at a cost not to exceed $21,000. 'Work on the study is pending the results of an action before the_.State-Lands Commission. FY 91-92 Proposed Cost: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92 CIP Budget Page: 100 CIP 89-609 MODULAR FURNITURE/COUNCIL CHAIRS $ 21,000 $ -0- Description: Plans, specifications and..estimates -for proposed City Hall modular furniture = .$.25,.000;__and new chairs for public seating in the Council Chamber --= $ 5,000. .- Status: ON HOLD. Staff has reviewed the costs of the modular furniture and the new Council chairs. Review and approval by the City Council will be required. Expenditure of funds has been put on hold for this fiscal year and the funds will be used to meet other budget needs. FY 91-92 Budget: . City Encumbered Funds:7/1/91.-_through_6/30/92: CIP Budget Page: 102..:_._.-_ $ -0- (unfunded) $ -0- CIP 89-613 COMMUNITY CENTER ELECTRICAL UPGRADE Description: Prepare plans and specifications leading to upgrading electrical services at the Community Center Buildings to meet current Code requirements. Status: ON HOLD. City Council placed the project on hold and directed the Department of Building & Safety to make an electrical analysis study. FY 91-92 Proposed Cost: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92: CIP Budget page: 106 $ -0- (unfunded) $ -0- CIP 89-615 COMMUNITY CENTER FIRE :ALARMS Description: This project was to replace the old existing fire alarm system at the Community Center and was recommended by the Fire Department. The new _system .is to be connected to the 911 dispatch desk in .the.. :_Police._ Department.: Status: COMPLETED. The totalbudgeted amount for FY 90-91 through FY 91-92 for this project was $10,000, of which, $9,896 was spent for equipment and materials. The installation of the totally new fire alarm system was completed by City staff and the activation date was on September 25, 1991. FY 91-92 Budget: - $ 374 City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92: $ ="'270 CIP Budget Page: 107A CIP 90-616 EARTHQUAKE REINFORCEMENT OF CLARK BUILDING Description: This project proposes to install a structural_ steel framework within the Clark Building to comply with current earthquake code requirements due by 1995. - Status: ON HOLD. The Building Department and the Public Works Department are to prepare an estimate of costs to upgrade the existing structure to meet present needs and codes. This estimate is to be compared with the cost of a new structure. Due to reduction in manpower, this project is proposed for FY 1992-93. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7//1/91 through 6/30/92 CIP Budget page: 108 45,000 -0- CIP 89-617 MUNICIPAL PIER ENTRANCE RESTORATION Description: This project proposes to restore and renovate the Municipal Pier entrance at the Strand. Status: IN PROGRESS. The Costal Conservancy has contracted with the firm of Moffat and Nichols to prepare a preliminary design/cost report. Their report is scheduled for completion in 1992, at no cost to the City. The report is to be coordinated with R/UDAT. FY 91-92 Proposed Cost: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91_..through 6/30/92: CIP Budget Page: 110 GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS CIP 89-701 CITY PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS $ -0- (unfunded) $ -0- Description: Upgrade City parking lots to include repairing pavement and walls, parking bumpers and new planting Status: IN PROGRESS. A portion of the project will include work within the VPD. The VPD is to provide input regarding the 3 downtown parking lots "A", "B" and "C". The improvements in those downtown parking lots are to be paid for by the parking contractor. FY 91-92 Budget: City Encumbered Funds 7/1/91 through 6/30/92: CIP Budget Page: 112 pworks/cipprog 15,000 -0- PROJECT PROJECT AMOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION FUNDED I I STREETS i SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS * 85-137 Overlay Valley, Ardmore t Prospect 89.141 Street Rehabilitation * 89-142 Sidewalk Repairs 90.144 Replace Strand Wall IL Walkway 89-146 Street Median Upgrades 89-150 Misc. Traffic Signal Improv. 90-151 Traffic Engineering Program 91-165 Misc. Bikeway Construction * 89.170 Slurry Sealing 86-176 Traffic Control Pre-emption 1,161,067 224,211 35,000 845,011 5,000 20,000 40,000 17,545 229,321 70,468 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS 88-201 Street Lighting Upgrades 22,000 STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 90-301 Misc. Storm Drain Improvements 0 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 88-406 Target Area 4 PARKS IMPROVEMENTS 1,148,806 89-506 Various Park Improv. 20,000 88-508 Park Irrigation 66,000 89.509 Tennis Court Resurfacing 0 90.510 Implement Park Master Plan 0 91-511 Railroad ROW Parking Lot 111,500 89-513 Purchase of 5 lots for Park 89-515 Purchase South School JUL AUG I SEP CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OCT FY91-92 NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 -- -- I I I I 111111 I I I I I I I I I I I ON HOLD I I —Omhoi'a*I ++ 4-+-4—I-I— I i ON HOLD MAY I JUN 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 • ON HOLD ON HOLD 1 I I i 50,000 I I I I I 2,342,854 I I I I I PUBLIC BUILDINGS i GROUNDS IMPROVEMENTS I I I 1 I 89.604 Various Building Improv. 488 ON HOLD 91-608 Public Works Yard 21,000 ON HOLD 89-609 Modular Furn. / Council Chairs 0 ON HOLD 89.611 Comm. Center Electrical Upgrade 0 ON HOLD * 89-615 Comm. Ctr. Fire Alarm Sys. 374 90-616 Clark Bldg. Earthquake Reinf. 45,000 ON HOLD 90-617 Municipal Pier Restoration 0 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS I I I I I 89-701 City Parking Lot Improvements 15,000 I I I I I * PROJECT COMPLETED 1 I, 1 1 1 h —1-1— 1— --4 -+ + • •:. • 4. • PROPOSAL DESIGN BIDDING LEGEND CONSTRUCTION M. *111010••••1 I I 4 CANCELED 1 REVISED AS OF 6/30/92 July 20, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of July 28, 1992 RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD BID FOR PURCHASE OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENT FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO MIKON COMPUTER SYSTEMS Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council authorize purchase of computer equipment from Mikon Computer Systems at a cost not to exceed $36,000.00. Analysis: City Council approved appropriation of $50,000.00 for the purchase of computer equipment for the Police Department Records and Dispatch system during fiscal year 1992/1993. Purchase of this equipment has been on hold since December 1989 when there was a directive not to purchase any computer equipment until a city-wide master plan was developed. Since that time, the department has attempted to obtain authorization to purchase the equipment needed to complete the dispatch system. Although the dispatch and police records system is a separate system from the City's and should not be linked with the regular city system, authorization was not granted. ,y/9 -- The computer equipment, listed in "exhibit A", will enable the department to finalize the installation of the software to complete the MDT (mobile data terminal) system. The MDT system is the computer terminals in the patrol units that allow the officer to perform records checks on vehicles and persons as well as communicate with other patrol units and the dispatch center. The department has been borrowing some equipment from the software vendor in order to get a portion of the system operational pending the final authorization to purchase the necessary equipment. It is important to note that purchase of this equipment is being funded by the Narcotics Forfeiture account and does not have an impact on the General Fund. This usage of the forfeiture funds is appropriate as the purchase will augment our existing program and does not supplant or decrease previous funding for the program. A public notice soliciting bids was published in the Easy Reader on June 11, 1992 and June 18, 1992. In addition, requests for bids were sent to 14 vendors. Six (6) bids were received and opened on July 9, 1992. One (1) additional bid arrived after the posted bid opening and was returned to the vendor unopened. The notarized bid list is attached as exhibit B. 1 if The computer systems staff of the Police Department has reviewed all of the bids and selected Mikon Computer Systems as the low bidder meeting all specifications with a bid of $32,713.00. In addition, staff members recommended that a 10% contingency be authorized in order to cover any unanticipated costs such as assembly and additional shipping of the equipment for a total cost not to exceed $36,000.00. Concur: / , L. d . i . ) kJ_(„„. Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copel nd, Director of Finance -2- Steve Wisniewski, Director of Public Safety REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL The City of Hermosa Beach is soliciting bids from qualified vendors to: 1. Furnish to the City of Hermosa Beach computer hardware and software for the Police Department meeting specifications set forth in Exhibit 1. 2. Copies of the bid can be picked up at the Hermosa Beach Police Department at 540 Pier Avenue or you can call Virginia Elledge (Records Administrator) and have a copy sent to you. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS: Proposals must be on file in the office of the City Clerk on or before 2:00 on Thursday July 9, 1992. The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to extend any time frame as necessary. No late proposals will be accepted. Late proposals received after the deadline will be returned to the bidder, unopened. Proposals are to be submitted in a sealed envelope with "Police Computer Proposals " written or typed in the lower left hand corner of the envelope. For additional information and other particulars regarding this bid, contact: Virginia Elledge Records Administrator/Computer Systems Manager Hermosa Beach Police Department 540 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, Ca, 90254 (213) 318-0310 EVALUATION OF PROPOSAL AND BASIS FOR AWARD 1. The City of Hermosa Beach intends to make an award to the responsible vendor meeting all requirements of the RFP whose proposal is most advantageous to the City of Hermosa Beach. 2. The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to negotiate with the overall lowest responsible bidder meeting qualifications and specifications set forth. 3. The City of Hermosa Beach intends to make an award within 3 0 days of the bid closing date. 4. The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to refect any and/or all bids and to waive any informalities. EXHIBIT 1 Page 1 of 2 Description Quan Part Number New DEC MicroVAX 3100 Model 40 1 DV -31 GTA -A9 8MB Memory, (1) Ethernet port, (4) Asyncronous lines, (1) SCSI Controllers, VMS 1-2 User License, DECnet End Node License, and one year on-site DEC Product warranty DEC Factory Installed Internal 1 SZ I 2X -HA 95mb TZ 30 tape drive Maxtor 213MB Internal 3.5" Disk Drive 1 LXT-2135Y w/mounting kits Maxtor 535MB Internal 3.5" Disk Drive 2 LXT-535S w/mounting kits Clearpoint 8 MB Expansion Memory 1 DCME-576/8MB for MicroVAX 3100 DEC Ethernet Board for MicroVax II 1 DELQA-14g in a H9642 Cabinet Winchester Systems FlashDAT 4mm Tabletop DAT Tape Drive DEC (8) Async & (1) RS232 Comm Controller DEC 4mm 1.2 GB Data Cartridges (Qty -5) DEC VMS 3-5 VMS User Upgrade DEC VMS 6-10 VMS User Upgrade DEC Local Network Interconnect DEC 15 ft. Transceiver Cable Executive Software DISKEEPER for VAX3100 DISKEEPER Update Support for VAX3100 Executive Software DISKEEPER for MicroVAXIU DISKEEPER Update Support for MicroVAXI I System Management Software Dynamic Load Balancer Software for VAX3100 System Management Software Updates & Telephone Support for VAX3100 DSFTQ-SB-1C4 DSH32- BA TLZ04-CB QL-001AP-BR QL-001AP-BW DELNI-BA BNE3H-05 QA-EXSWR-31 DK QT-EXSWR-31 DKB QA-EXSWR- IIDKBDK QT-EXSWR-IIDKB QA-SMDLB-31 QT-SMDLB-31 B Page2of2 System Management Software Dynamic Load Balancer Software 1 QA-SMDLB-I I for MicroVAXII System Management Software Updates & Telephone Support 1 QT-SMDLB-11B for MicroVAX, I All products must be new and delivered in factory sealed packaging. All products must include a 1 year on site warranty. Substitution of part numbers or incomplete bids will poi be accepted. Freight to Pleasanton, CA, and insurance to be provided by the supplier of the above items. Vendor information for above items available upon request. BID OPENING 2LIC E PROJECT NO. BIDDERS NAME i) DIG I rA LBRsics I I BID OPENING LOG SHEET ES , ; 3 oMPurER t�" opos4LS BID BOND kVA" AMOUNT OF BID 31(96,.50 2)601)-E. J46»FoiQiE5 1 L CotztEcTi010 3,) I I a 5° 3 6) Z5-7. £ 1ur1 F0ij EFR -ST/4-11/4)D1%�'j� E C_TAc 1 CS 33, O c} $ o0 11 I KOO Co lio I EIZ a STEMS 32, 713.©6 5� fERGNF a_ Assoc/ (FrFs -a)51. y� (,) 50135T/4R Co mpA-0) ;? ►1-,/ s� fir; -\ a. 3(--)sq3. -r r7 5 O JUL 91992 - 7. 2 1-f Qe, A Femme. /'� Carnet - OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 July 21, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council - July 28, 1992 THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the City's participation in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Implementation Agreement. 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. Background: The City of Hermosa Beach and eighteen other cities plus the County of Los Angeles and Caltrans have signed an agreement to reduce pollutants to the Santa Monica Bay from the Santa Monica Bay drainage basin. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit related to that agreement and for Los Angeles County was issued on June 18, 1990, by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB). In the near future, the number of Co -permittees covered by the permit is expected to increase to over 80 cities within the overall Los Angeles County drainage basin. The CRWQCB has requested the present permitees to prepare and adopt a Permit Implementation Agreement. The draft of this Implementation Agreement was provided for review and comment to the City Council on December 10, 1991. The attached final form of the Implementation Agreement is being submitted to the Council for approval. Analysis: This agreement establishes the responsibilities of each party with respect to compliance with the NPDES Permit. A copy of the permit is attached to this agreement as Attachment "A". The agreement has been developed in compliance with the approved permit. The approved permit listed 10 tasks which were to be completed by each Co -Permittee by the end of the first year. Those tasks involved the compiling of existing data, listing of present practices, and proposing new procedures related to stormwater ig drainage. The report on the first year activities has been completed by the County and forwarded to the State for review. The task activities that need to be completed by each participant in the second year include the following actions: 1. development of an additional*Best Management Practices (BMP) program, 2. a workplan for a stormwater/urban runoff monitoring program and 3. a report on annual permit activities as included within this Permit Implementation Agreement. Alternatives: Do not sign this Stormwater Permit That action would require the City Municipal Drainage Permit and that the City. Respectfully submitted. ,5'C»/ Homayoiin Behboodi Assistant Engineer Attachments: Implementation Agreement. to file a separate NPDES cost would be excessive for Concur: b ` Lynn A. Terry P.E. Deputy City Engineer William Grove, Acting Director of Public Works e,L,D Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager (1) Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement (2) Copy of the NPDES Permit No. CA0061654-CI6948 (Attachment "A"). pworks/ccnpdes3 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT NO. CA0061654-CI6948 PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT • This Agreement is entered into by and among the Permittees as defined hereinbelow. This Agreement establishes the responsibilities of each party hereto with respect to compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. CA0061654-CI6948 (herein called the Permit), attached hereto as Attachment A, issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (CRWQCB). The parties hereto agree as follows: A. DEFINITIONS 1. Principal Permittee means the County of Los Angeles. 2. Co -Permittee means any city or other entity which is a Co -Permittee under the Permit and which is a party to this Agreement. Any city or other entity which is listed in the Permit as a Co -Permittee but which is not a party to this Agreement shall not be considered a Co -Permittee for purposes of this Agreement. 3. Permittees includes the Principal Permittee and all the Co -Permittees. 4. Flood Control _District means all that portion of the County of Los Angeles lying south of the north line of Township 5 North, San Bernardino base, excepting therefrom the islands of Santa Catalina and San Clemente and the islands off the coast included in Los Angeles County. 5. Jurisdictional boundaries means: (1) for cities, the city boundaries (2) for counties, the unincorporated areas within such county, and (3) for special agencies such as Caltrans, the property boundaries of the agency. 6. Storm drain system, per 40 Code of Federal Regulations part 122, Section 122.26(b)(8), means a conveyance or system of conveyances, including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, man-made channels, or storm drains. B. STRUCTURE AND RESPONSIBILITIES 1. All Permittees are independently responsible for complying with the requirements of the Permit within their own jurisdictional boundaries, except that a.Permittee is responsible for such compliance for all storm drains that it owns within the jurisdictional boundary of another Permittee. 2. The Principal Permittee shall be .responsible for the following: a) Coordination of Permit activities, including establishing a uniform mapping.and data presentation format, to be used by all Permittees. Page 2 b) Serving as the liaison agency between the Co -Permittees and the CRWQCB with responsibilities including: i) Establishment of 'reasonable time schedules and notifying Co -Permittees of such schedules for the performance of tasks and activities per the requirements of the Permit. ii) Preparation of quarterly progress reports and annual Permit reports on Permit activities for submittal to the CRWQCB. For the annual Permit report, a draft will be circulated to each Co -Permittee for its review and comment prior to forwarding to the CRWQCB. Final copies of reports shall be forwarded to the Co -Permittees. iii) Upon receipt of information and materials submitted by the Co -Permittees in compliance with Permit requirements, packaging and forwarding these submittals, on behalf of the Co -Permittees, to the CRWQCB. iv) For Permit submittals which involve public review, i.e., Permit requirements 2.1.8 to 2.1.9 and 3.1.2 to 3.1.4 (as specified on pages 9 to 11 of the Permit), the Principal Permittee shall schedule the submittals for public input, route public comment back to Co -Permittees for possible refinement of documents, arrange to receive final documents, and package and forward documents to the CRWQCB for their review and approval. v) Updating all Co -Permittees on CRWQCB and/or the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US -EPA) regulations and Co -Permittee responsibilities related to stormwater discharge activities and Permit compliance. vi) Arranging for the collection and payment of all annual Permit renewal fees required by the CRWQCB, as referred to in Section C below. c) Developing a work plan for a proposed stormwater/urban runoff monitoring program within each drainage basin. Soliciting input on the program from Co -Permittees within the respective drainage basin. Subsequent to the approval of the program by the CRWQCB, installing, operating, and maintaining the equipment for the program and reporting the progress and findings of the program to the CRWQCB. d) Establishing and chairing an advisory committee -or committees consisting of the Principal Permittee and volunteer Co -Permittees to develop recommendations for consideration by the Permittees on basin -wide drainage (as defined in Section 1 of the Permit) programs. Page 3 3. Each Co -Permittee shall agree to perform all tasks required by Sections 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 of the Permit according to a format and time schedule specified by the Principal Permittee, unless a format and/or time schedule is specified by the CRWQCB. 4. Each Permittee shall adopt a water pollution control ordinance (or formal agency policy for Co -Permittees which do not adopt ordinances) regulating stormwater/urban runoff discharges to the storm drain system as required by the Permit. Such an ordinance shall prohibit all discharges to the storm drain system which are in violation of Federal and/or State laws and regulations. The ordinance must provide for its enforcement and at a minimum specify that violators may be subject to penalties including, but not limited to, fines and termination of the activity causing the violation. The failure of any Co -Permittee to adopt such an ordinance or policy within the time period allowed by the Permit or such longer time granted by the Principal Permittee shall be deemed to be a withdrawal by that Co -Permittee from this Agreement. 5. Each Permittee shall be responsible for the implementation of measures, as required by the Permit, to identify and eliminate all discharges to the storm drain system which are in violation of Federal, State, and/or local laws and regulations. Each Permittee shall be responsible for responding to illegal discharge/dumping incidents that occur during the term of this Agreement involving the storm drain system owned and operated by that Permittee. To the extent required by the Permit, such response shall- include investigation, containment and clean-up activities as appropriate. This Agreement shall not preclude any legal action by a Permittee against any party(ies) responsible for illegal and illicit discharges to any storm drain and/or flood control system. 6. Each Permittee agrees to notify another Permittee, in accordance with and to the extent required by guidelines to be developed and approved by the Permittees, if it becomes aware of an illegal discharge or dumping incident that involves or may impact that other Permittee's storm drain system. 7. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as imposing any duties upon any Permittee beyond those required by the Permit. This Agreement shall not constitute an indemnification Agreement under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) Section 107(e), 42 United States Code 9607(e), or any other provision of law. C. FUNDING 1. Each Permittee shall fund the implementation of its activities required by the Permit (1) within all storm drains that it owns'and (2) within its jurisdictional boundaries, except within any storm drains owned by another Permittee. Page 4 2. The Principal Permittee shall fund the Permit renewal fees and the activities specified in Section B.2 above through the Los Angeles County Flood Control District on behalf of those Permittees within the District. 3. A separate funding Agreement to assist in funding the Permit renewal fees and the Permit activities specified in Section B.2 above shall be executed between the Principal Permittee and any Co -Permittee not within the Los Angeles County Flood Control District or not subject to its funding structure. Negotiation of such Agreements shall be solely between the Principal Permittee and the Co -Permittee in question. If any such funding Agreement is not in place within a year after the execution of this Agreement .by the Co -Permittee in question, or within any longer time period granted by the Principal Permittee, the Co -Permittee which has not executed such funding Agreement shall be deemed to have withdrawn from this Agreement. D. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT 1. This Agreement shall not be construed to confer any authority upon the Principal Permittee to enforce the requirements of the Permit. 2. If any fine or penalty is imposed upon the Permittees by the CRWQCB or other regulatory agency for a violation of the Permit, pursuant to California Water Code Section 13385 or Section 309 of the Clean Water Act (33 Unites States Code 1319), only those Permittees responsible for a violation of the Permit (including those Permittees whose noncompliance with this Agreement caused the Permit violation) shall be responsible for the payment of such fine or penalty. Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute an admission by any Permittee that any such fine or penalty has been lawfully imposed, nor shall this Agreement preclude any right a Permittee may otherwise have to contest such fine or penalty. E. WITHDRAWAL FROM AGREEMENT 1. Any Permittee wishing to withdraw from this Agreement shall be required to provide written notice, in the form of a resolution adopted by the governing body of the Permittee, to all other Permittees at least 60 days prior to the effective date of the withdrawal, except that for any withdrawal pursuant to Section B.4. or Section C.3. of this Agreement, the Principal Permittee shall notify all Co -Permittees within 60 days after the effective date of the withdrawal. 2. A withdrawing Co -Permittee shall be responsible for the direct processing costs of the Principal Permittee associated with such withdrawal and all funding commitments made by such Permittee prior to withdrawal. F. AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENT 1. This Agreement may be amended by the written approval of all parties to this Agreement. Page 5 2. Any amendment shall comply with the requirements and regulations set forth by the CRWQCB. G. ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS If any Permittee executes a separate Agreement with any other Permittee(s) regarding stormwater/urban runoff discharge management issues, such Agreement will not constitute an amendment to this Agreement, even though it may reference this Agreement. H. TERM OF THE AGREEMENT This Agreement commences as to 'each Permittee upon execution by the duly authorized representative of such Permittee. The term of the Agreement shall be the same as the current NPDES Permit issued by the CRWQCB (valid through June 30, 1995). I. NOTICES All notices and correspondences shall be deemed duly given, if they are forwarded,to the designated representative of the Permittee via a) certified U.S. mail; b) delivered by hand; c) three (3) days after deposit in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid and notice to the addressee of such mailing by phone immediately after deposit in the U.S. Mail; or d) faxed and confirmed by phone immediately after sending the FAX. J. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with laws of the State of California. If any provision(s) of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. FK:mp/NPDES.LAR IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. COUNTY OF Los ANGELES DATE: By: T. A. TIDEMANSON DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS APPROVED AS TO FORM: DeWitt W. Clinton County Counsel By: Deputy IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CITY'OF AGOURA HILLS DATE: CITY MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY ATTESTED CITY CLERK IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS DATE: ATTEST: (SEAL) JEAN M. USHIJIMA City Clerk ROBERT K. TANENBAUM Mayor of the City of Beverly Hills, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: GREGORY W. STEPANICICH MARK SCOTT City Attorney City Manager 1r DONALD J. OBLANDER Director of Finance Administration DAN WEBSTER Director of Public Works IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CITY OF CALABASAS DATE: ATTEST: Bob Hill Mayor Charles R. Cate APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CALTRANS DATE: STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation APPROVED AS TO FORM AND PROCEDURE: JAMES VAN LOBEN SELLS Director of Transportation Attorney By: JERRY B. BAXTER District Director CERTIFIED AS TO FUNDS AND PROCEDURE: District Accounting Officer IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS* AGREEMENT. CITY OF CULVER CITY DATE: By: DR. JAMES D. BOULEGARIDES MAYOR ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: PAULINE C. DOLCE,.City Clerk NORMAN Y. HERRING CITY ATTORNEY IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. , CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DATE: City Clerk City of El Segundo Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM: '/ By: Mayor Cit Attorney Attest: City Clerk IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CITY OF INGLEWOOD DATE: ATTEST: Mayor of the City of Inglewood CITY CLERK (Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1• CITY ATTORNEY IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CITY OF Los ANGELES DATE: By: Tom Bradley Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: James K. Hahn City Attorney, City of Los Angeles By: Michael L. Claessens Deputy City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CITY OF MALIBU DATE: ATTEST: Raymond B. Taylor City Clerk Walter Keller Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DATE: Bill Smith City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: Carl Newton City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES DATE: By: Rosemary Humprey, MAYOR ATTEST: Barbara J. Culver, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DATE: By: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor City Attorney Attest: City Clerk IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. . CITY OF REDONDO BEACH DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: W. Brad Parton City Attorney Mayor IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DATE: By: Gordana Swanson Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Craig Nealis Mike Jenkins City Manager City Attorney Craig Nealis City Clerk IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: PETER M. WEBER City Attorney MAYOR IN. WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CITY OF SANTA MONICA DATE: John Jalili City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CITY OF TORRANCE DATE: ATTEST: By By City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Torrance By IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE DATE: Bernice E. Bennett Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Larry W. Bagley City Attorney City Clerk IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD By: ATTEST: DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. VENTURA COUNTY DATE: By: ATTEST: RICHARD D. DEAN, County Clerk of the County of Ventura and ex officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura and of the Ventura County Flood Control District Chair, Board of Supervisors APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: By: Deputy Clerk County Counsel . ATTACHMENT A STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD LOS ANGELES REGION ORDER No. 90-079 NPDES NO. CA0061654 (CI 6948) WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS STORMWATER/URBAN RUNOFF DISCHARGE for LOS ANGELES COUNTY and CO -PERMITTEES The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles, (Regional Board) finds : 1. The County of Los Angeles, in cooperation with the following cities : Agoura Hills, Beverly Hills,. Culver City, El Segundo, Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Los Angeles, Manhattan Beach, Rancho Palos Verdes, Redondo Beach, Rolling Hills Estates, Rolling Hills, Santa Monica, Torrance, West Hollywood, and Westlake Village, has submitted a report of waste discharge (NPDES permit application) dated March 15, 1990 for issuance of waste discharge requirements for the County of Los Angeles and other cities tributary to Los Angeles County (excluding Antelope Valley) under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES Permit No. CA0061654). 2. The discharges consist of surface runoff generated from various land uses in all the hydrologic drainage basins which discharge into water courses flowing into water bodies in Los Angeles County. The quality of these discharges varies considerably and is affected by land use, basin hydrology and geology, season, and the frequency and duration of storm events. The constituents of concern and significance in these discharges are: total and fecal coliform and enterococci bacteria, total suspended solids, biochemical oxygen demand, oil and grease, heavy metals, nutrients, polychlorinated biphenyls, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, pesticides and herbicides, and petroleum hydrocarbons. 1 CA0061654 3. The objective of this permit is to develop a timely, comprehensive, and cost- effective stormwater pollution control program to minimize pollutants in • urban runoff/stormwater discharges to water bodies in Los Angeles County. 4. Due to the complexity and networking of drainage facilities within and tributary to Los Angeles County, the county and adjacent areas discharging storm water into Los Angeles County are divided and prioritized into five drainage basins for the implementation of the permit. The owners/operators of all facilities impacting stormwater quality will be ultimately a party to these waste discharge requirements. The County of Los Angeles together with the cities identified above, the initial parties filing for the system -wide permit, are 'Permittees', with the County of Los Angeles as the 'Principal Permittee' and the rest as 'Co -Permittees'. All other cities and recognized entities such . as Caltrans, college/university campuses, hospitals, parks, agricultural areas, real estate developments and waste disposal facilities identified in this Order, are designated 'Co -Participants'. A 'Co -Participant' will be a 'Co -Permittee' upon becoming an active party to the permit. Attachments 1 and 2 show, respectively, the list of cities and a partial list of entities designated as Co -Participants for this permit. The list of entities will be revised as. necessary. 5. The County of Los Angeles, as the 'Principal Permittee', will obtain the cooperation of 'Co -Participants' to become 'Co -Permittees'. The Regional Board has the discretion and authority to require non -cooperating cities and/or entities to become 'Co -Permittees' or obtain individual stormwater discharge permits, pursuant to 40 CFR 122.26 (a). 6. Los Angeles County as the 'Principal Permittee' is the permit coordinator responsible for general administration of this Order, and coordinating cooperation by 'Co -Permittees', including but not limited to the implementation of local self-monitoring programs and Best Management Practices, and the preparation and submittal of reports required by this Order. 7. Los Angeles County obtains its authority to : - . control pollutants in stormwater discharge - prohibit illegal discharges and control spills - require compliance and carry out inspections 2 CA0061654 of drainage facilities in the County of Los Angeles from the Los Angeles County Flood Control .Act and various county ordinances which address industrial wastes and waste discharges within the unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County and contract cities. 'Co -Permittees' with the status of incorporated cities have various forms of legal authority in place, such as charters, State Code provisions for General Law cities, city ordinances and applicable portions of Municipal Codes and the State Water Code, to regulate stormwater/urban runoff discharges. 8. The division and prioritization of Los Angeles County and adjacent areas into five drainage basins for program implementation are based on hydrological characteristics of the watersheds, perceived importance and beneficial uses of water bodies, and the existence of an adequate infrastructure for program implementation. The five drainage basins are : e I Santa Monica Bay Drainage Basin II Upstream Los Angeles River Drainage Basin, to and including Sycamore Canyon Channel (San Fernando Valley); III Upper San Gabriel River (San Gabriel Valley) Drainage Basin. IV Lower Los Angeles River Drainage Basin V •Lower San Gabriel River Drainage Basin; and Santa. Clarita Valley Basin. Attachment 3 shows a map of Los Angeles County with the boundary delineations of the five drainage basins. Attachment 4 shows Co -Participant cities in Los Angeles County (and their respective populations). [ Note: Detailed maps of the Los Angeles County storm drain system with boundary delineations of drainage basins are available for review at the Regional Board Office.] 3 CA0061654 9. A number of studies on stormwater/urban runoff pollution in the permit areas has been conducted by agencies such as the City of Los Angeles, the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project and the Southern .California Association of Governments. These studies indicate stormwater/urban runoff contributes significantly to the deterioration of the quality of water bodies in Los Angeles County. The University of California at Los Angeles, under the sponsorship of the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project, is currently compiling and summarizing data and information on stormwater/urban runoff discharges for the Santa Monica Bay watershed. 10. The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works has an active surface water quality monitoring program in the permit area, comprising twenty- eight monitoring stations located at principal storm drains and water conservation facilities. The Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program comprises the collection and analysis of dry weather water samples for general minerals, pesticides, total petroleum hydrocarbons, heavy metals and bacteria (total and fecal coliform, KF streptococci and enterococci). Volatile organic constituents are tested semi-annually at selected stations. Stormwater runoff is monitored three to four times annually at twenty-one stations for minerals, pesticides, heavy metals (total and dissolved), bacteria, total and organic suspended solids, oil and grease, biochemical oxygen demand, total organic carbon and volatile organics. 11. The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works and some cities have on-going activities that reduce stormwater/urban runoff pollutant loads. These activities include periodic catch -basin cleaning and street sweeping, public information on proper disposal of household hazardous waste, and emergency responses to reports of illegal dumping, illicit disposal, illegal connections, and industrial waste spills. The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works also participates and coordinates action with local, State, and Federal agencies responding to spills and illegal dumping reports that threaten surface waters. 12. The Regional Board currently regulates industrial process and point source non -process wastewater and stormwater discharges to storm drain systems through NPDES permits. Point source discharges including stormwater will continue to be regulated by the Regional Board. An information system will be developed and maintained to update pollutant loadings to designated 4 CA0061654 drainage facilities and water bodies from permitted point source discharges. 13. The State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) adopted a Water Quality Control Policy for the Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California on May 16, 1974. The policy provides that the discharge of industrial process waters to enclosed bays and estuaries shall be prohibited. Storm water and urban runoff are not considered industrial process waters for the purpose of that policy. 14. The State Board adopted a revised Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean waters of California (Ocean Plan) on March 22, 1990, which amended the Plan adopted on September 22, 1988. The Plan contains water quality objectives for the coastal waters of California. 15. The Regional Board adopted a revised Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles River Basin (Basin Plan) on November 27, 1978. The Basin Plan incorporates the Ocean Plan, and contains water quality objectives for - the basin, including the beneficial uses of water bodies. 16. The beneficial uses of water bodies in Los Angeles County and their tributary streams include contact water recreation, non -contact water recreation, wildlife habitat, preservation of rare and endangered species, marine habitat, estuarine habitat, fish migration, fish spawning, industrial service and process supply, agricultural water supply, shellfish harvesting, navigation, commercial and sport fishing, and groundwater recharge. 17. Section 405 of the Water Quality Act of 1987 added Section 402(p) to the Clean Water Act of 1972 to require the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish regulations for stormwater/urban runoff discharge under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). 18. The Federal Clean Water Act allows EPA to delegate its NPDES permitting authority to States with an approved environmental regulatory program. The State of California is one of the delegated States. The Porter -Cologne Act (State Water Code) authorizes the State Board, through its Regional Boards, to regulate and control the discharge of pollutants into waters of the state and tributaries thereto. 19. Although Water Code Section 13263 (a) requires that waste discharge requirements issued by Regional Boards shall include provisions to implement water quality based objectives, numerical water quality standards 5 CA0061654 are not provided in this Order. Information is not available to establish appropriate numerical limits, and determine locations where permittees shall be made accountable. The requirements in this Order will provide the . necessary information while concurrently achieving reductions in pollutant loads to water bodies from stormwater/urban runoff discharges. Numerical water quality objectives will be developed by Board staff for consideration in the permit renewal process and utilized for the evaluation of Best Management Practices. 20. Due to the significance of the Los Angeles County Stormwater/Urban Runoff Program, the Regional Board, in recognition of the need for public involvement and participation in the development and implementation of an effective program will conduct at a minimum an annual workshop, prior to approving plans submitted by Permittees, to solicit comments and to inform the public of the progress of the program. Comments presented will be referred to Los Angeles County for response. 21. Stormwater/urban runoff discharges to drainage facilities that cross County boundaries and Regional Board jurisdictions, and which are regulated under NPDES permits, are the regulatory responsibility of those agencies issuing the permits. 22. The issuance of waste discharge requirements for this discharge is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 21100) of Division 13 of the Public Resources Code in accordance with Water Code Section 13389. The Board has notified the Permittees and interested agencies and persons of its intent to issue waste discharge requirements for this discharge and has provided them with an opportunity to submit their written views and recommendations. The Board, in a public hearing, heard and considered all comments pertaining to the discharge and to the tentative requirements. This Order shall serve as a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit pursuant to Section 402 of the Federal Clean Water Act, or amendments thereto, and shall take effect at the end of ten days from the date of its adoption provided the Regional Administrator, EPA, has no objections. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Permittees, in order to meet the provisions contained in Division 7 of the California Water Code and, regulations adopted thereunder, 6 CA0061654 and the provisions of the Clean Water Act as amended and regulations and guidelines adopted thereunder, shall comply with the following: 1.0 COMPLIANCE 1.1 The Permittees and Co -Permittees shall comply with the requirements contained in this Order according to the following schedule: DRAINAGE BASIN STARTING DATE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS July 1, 1990 July 1, 1992 I. Santa Monica Bay II. Upper Los Angeles River (San Fernando Valley) IIL Upper San Gabriel River (San Gabriel Valley) IV. Lower Los Angeles River V. Lower San Gabriel River and Santa Clarita Valley 2.0 REQUIREMENTS - YEAR 1 July 1, 1992 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 2.1 For each Drainage Basin, prepare and submit to the Regional Board within 12 months of the starting date for compliance, according to the schedule under 1.1: 2.1.1 Water quality data and flow data from 1980 to the present to facilitate identification of sources - of pollutants present in discharges from the prioritized drainage basin. "Drainage areas" in the drainage basin are to be reported and the "drainage areas" associated with each drainage basin clearly identified. 7 CA0061654 For purposes of stormwater/urban runoff a 'drainage area' is defined as a subdivision of a drainage basin which is unique in land use patterns, and pollutant characteristics and loadings. 2.1.2 The 90th percentile value for the water quality parameters, (i) Total Suspended Solids (TSS), and (ii) Oil and Grease, from the data set of all wet weather samples collected from 1980 to the present. These data will be used to establish guidance for early action control of stormwater pollution. The. 90th percentile for a given water quality parameter is defined as the concentration value exceeded in ten percent of the samples of the reference data set. 2.1.3 Additional information of a qualitative nature that would contribute to isolating and identifying sources of problems. Such information should include but not be limited to visual observations of factors exacerbating stormwater contamination, principal " land use classifications and Standard Industrial Code (SIC) categories of facilities in "drainage areas", and a description of soils, dumps, landfills, waste disposal sites and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facilities • associated with each area. 2.1.4 Monthly precipitation data from rain gauge stations, relevant to the drainage basin, for the years 1980 to the present, and an estimate of the area of impervious surfaces (including paved areas and building roofs) within each "drainage area". 2.1.5 Documentation of existing procedures to detect and address illegal discharges and illicit disposal practices. 2.1.6 Documentation of existing practices and improvement plans to control pollutants in stormwater/urban runoff from construction sites. 2.1.7 Documentation of existing stormwater/urban runoff management practices and existing Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the control of pollutants in discharges from residential, commercial and industrial areas. For purposes of this permit, a Best Management Practice is defined as a stormwater quality management practice that has been demonstrated to reduce stormwater/urban runoff constituents of concern in studies in the United States and elsewhere, or a stormwater/urban runoff quality management practice that can significantly control stormwater/urban runoff pollution. CA0061654 2.1.8 Plan with schedule of implementation, for approval by the Executive Officer, of early action BMPs. For purposes of this permit, an early action BMP is defined as an edsting stormwater/urban runoff quality management practice that is of ized to the maximum extent practicable (MEP) in efficiency for the control f stormwater runoff pollution, such as improving the frequency of storm drain catchment basin cleaning or the stricter enforcement of existing regulations, or a BMP that is not specific to stormwater/urban runoff constituents or 'drainage area' in its constituent removal capacity and can be applied on a system -wide basis, such as public outreach and educational programs. For purposes of this permit, maximum extent practicable means to the maximum extent possible, taking into account equitable considerations of synergistic, additive and competing factors, including but not limited to gravity of the problem, fiscal feasibility, public health risks, societal concern, and social benefits. The Principal -Permittee, in the submittal of plans and schedules to the Executive Officer, shall demonstrate that public input has been obtained. For purposes of this permit, public input is demonstrated by, (i) disseminating the • notice of availability of plans for review and comment, to the public at large, environmental groups, Federal, State and local officials and other interested parties, and (ii) addressing concerns expressed by the public. The Board may modify the plans in response to public input received at the Board during its comment/review period. Permittees are required to implement the original or modified plan on approval by the Executive Officer. 2.1.9 A workplan for the development of a stormwater/urban runoff monitoring program, for approval by the Executive Officer, to include but not be limited . to the following information : o listing of constituents and parameters to be monitored and the rationale for their choice. o listing of monitoring locations and the rationale for their choice. o listing of sampling methodology of choice and frequency of sampling for both wet weather and dry weather flow. o supplementary information that influences the design of the monitoring plan. CA0061654 The Principal -Permittee, in the submittal of the workplan to the Executive Officer, shall demonstrate that public input has been obtained. 2.1.10 Documentation that each Permittee, individually and/or jointly, through the establishment of a joint powers authority or a stormwater utility, possesses adequate legal authority to operate and manage stormwater/urban runoff quality management programs, and/or plans to obtain the necessary legal authority to regulate illegal discharges and illicit disposal practices into storm drains, and to prosecute violators. 3.0 REQUIREMENTS - YEAR 2 3.1 For each Drainage Basin, prepare and submit to the Regional Board, for approval by the Executive Officer, within 24 months of the starting date of compliance, according to the schedule under 1.1: 3.1.1 A monitoring program based on the approved workplan. This program shall be designed to: o detect accurately the constituents and parameters of concern, in discharges indicated in the workplan, and to identify their possible sources. o identify illegal dischargers and/or locations of illicit disposal practices. Monitoring reports for this program shall be submitted according to the format and frequency to be approved by the Executive Officer. 3.1.2 Plan with schedule of implementation for additional BMPs, judged appropriate for each city or drainage basin, to control pollutants from residential, commercial and industrial sites to the maximum extent practicable. Both structural and non-structural BMP measures are to be evaluated at the MEP standard. Examples of non-structural measures include catch basin cleaning, street sweeping and public education, while controls such as detention/retention basins, first flush diversions, grassy swales and porous pavements are examples of structural measures. 10 CA0061654 3.1.3 Plan with schedule of implementation of procedures to detect and eliminate illegal discharges and illicit disposal practices. 3.1.4 Plan with schedule of implementation of measures to control pollutants in surface runoff from construction sites. The Principal Permittee, in the submittal of plans and schedules (items 3.1.2, 3.1.3, and 3.1.4) to the Executive Officer shall demonstrate that public input has been obtained. The Board may modify the plans in response to public input received at the Board during its comment/review period. Permittees are required to implement the original or modified plans on approval by the Executive Officer. 3.2 Evidence of satisfactory progress of implementation of plan and schedule for early action BMPs. 3.3 Evidence of all requisite legal authority to regulate illegal discharges and illicit disposal practices to drainage facilities, and to prosecute violators. 4.0 REQUIREMENTS - YEAR 3 4.1 For each Drainage Basin, submit to the Regional Board, within 36 months of the starting date of compliance, according to the schedule under 1.1, the following: - 4.1.1 Evidence of satisfactory progress of implementation of plan and schedule for early action BMPs and additional BMPs. 4.1.2 Evidence of implementation and progress of procedures to detect and eliminate illegal discharges and eliminate illicit disposal practices. 4.1.3 Evidence of implementation and progress of measures to control pollutants in surface runoff from construction sites. 5.0 EXPIRATION AND RENEWAL 5.1 This Order expires on June 18, 1995. 5.2 The Permittees shall file a report of waste discharge. (ROWD), not later than 180 days before the expiration date, as application for reissuance of waste discharge requirements. This report of waste discharge shall include but not be limited to the following: 11' CA0061654 5.2.1 Summary of the results of the monitoring program. .5.2.2 Summary of BMPs implemented and evaluations of their effectiveness. 5.2.3 Summary of procedures implemented to detect illegal discharges and illicit disposal practices and an evaluation of their effectiveness. 5.2.4 Summary of measures implemented to control pollutants in surface runoff from construction sites and an evaluation of their effectiveness. 5.2.5 Evaluation of the need for additional BMPs, source control, and/or structural control measures. 5.2.6 Proposed plan of stormwater/urban runoff quality management activities that will be. undertaken during the term of the next permit. -- • I, Robert P. Ghirelli, Executive Officer, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of an order adopted by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region, on June 18, 1990. ROBERT P. GHIRELLI, D.Env. Executive Officer CA0061654 ATTACHMENT 3 DELINEATIONS OF DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARIES FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY .\...._ n.^ .>>4\ l- .' fir;. -':.. jjfY. +ply-' _i,) • ate, 74.-- . , .. ...„.}4:4,r fr,...,,... :...r...,... ... ....,..,....„.!::::•:,..,.:.._:-.......... lc,._0`..,,,,,..r,..;;;;....„... ,z1-......iisi-s-,-.._.........` .. T� - .'1'- E- t� i ..' • .��t ''r,,,�`�, ..• - its '✓�. 7, • 2a41/('a`''j' 1 • f' .:. i'l Is"?.•fit J -'1 •F 1.• •{ - '-,-ri't'e 1•c��fi�S4 jj s. •7 f�i = /4.•'�f'�...�:�ljC • i -il;-. i •L • re far--- - • f 4 M 1' 4 -rr P 4 C 0 c EA N County of Lo. Ang. l.. D.D.RMnt of Publ IC Work. MAJOR FACILITIES CONTROL AND CONSERVATION OF FLOOD WATERS mow Basin Bounor les CA0061654 MEM' 4 CITIES (AND. POPULATIONS) TRIBUTARY TO DRAINAGE BASINS Santa Monica Bay Agoura Hills 19,000 Rancho Palos Verdes 46,000 Beverly Hills 34,000 Redondo Beach 64,700 Culver City 40,950 Rolling Hills 2,090 El Segundo 15,750 Rolling Hills Estates 7,875 Hermosa Beach 19,750 Santa Monica 96,500 Inglewood 102,300 Thousand Oaks 104,400 Los Angeles 3,400,500 Torrance 142,200 Manhattan Beach 35,300 West Hollywood 38,400 Westlake Village 8,025 Palos Verdes Estates 15,000 Upper Los Angeles River Burbank ' 93,800 Glendale 166,100 Hidden Hills 1,950 Los Angeles 3,310,057 San Fernando 20,700 Upper San Gabriel River Alhambra 74,900 Arcadia 49,100 Azusa 38,250 Baldwin Park 63,300 Bradbury 930 Claremont 36,550 Covina 43,250 Diamond Bar 74,120 Duarte 21,350 El Monte 95,400 Glendora 47,400 Industry 370 Irwindale 1,230 La Canada Flintridge 20,800 La Habra Heights 5,450 La Puente 33,550 La Verne 30,500 Monrovia 34,000 Montebello 58,200 Monterey Park 64,600 Pasadena 132,200 Pomona 119,000 Rosemead 47,700 San Dimas . 32,500 San Gabriel 34,900 -San Marino 13,800 Sierra Madre 11,250 South El Monte 18,700 South Pasadena 24,500 Temple City 31,900 Walnut 26,400 West Covina 94,200 (CONTINUED) Lower Los Angeles River. CA0061654 Alhambra 74,900 Bell 28,250 Bel Gardens 38,300 Carson 88,800 Commerce 11,700 Compton 93,000 Cudahy 20,700 Downey 86,800 El Segundo 15,750 Gardena 50,900 Glendale 166,100 Hawthorne 67,400 Huntington Park 51,200 Inglewood 102,300 La Canada Flintridge 20,800 Lakewood 76,500 Lawndale 27,300 Lomita 20,300 Los Angeles 3,400,500 Lynwood 53,700 Maywood 24,650 Montebello 58,200 Monterey Park 64,600 Palos Verdes Estates 15,000 Paramount 44,450 Pasadena 132,200 Pico Rivera 57,300 Rancho Palos Verdes 46,000 Redondo Beach 64,700 Rolling Hills 2,090 Rolling Hills Estates 7,875 Signal Hill 8,150 South Gate 79,200 South Pasadena 24,500 Torrance 142,200 Vernon S0 Lower San Gabriel River. Artesia 14,950 Bellflower 60,900 Cerritos 58,400 Downey 86,800 Hawaiian Gardens 12,350 La Habra Heights 5,450 Lakewood 76,500 La Mirada 42,600 Long Beach 419,800 Norwalk 90,800 Paramount 44,450 Pico Rivera 57,300 Santa Clarita 115,700 Santa Fe Springs 16,400 Signal Hill 8,150 Whittier 74,100 Population estimates are taken from Report 89 E-1 published by the State of California Department of Finance. The cities of Avalon (Pop: 2,490), Lancaster (Pop: 82,200), and Palmdale (Pop: 45,850) which are within Los Angeles County are not part of this permit. CA0061654 ATTACHMENT>t: LIST OF CO=PARTICIPANT CITIES Agoura Hills Alhambra Arcadia Artesia Avalon Azusa Baldwin Park Bell Bellflower Bell Gardens Beverly Hills Bradbury Burbank Carson Cerritos Claremont Commerce Compton Covina Cudahy Culver City Diamond Bar Downey Duarte El Monte El Segundo Gardena Glendale Glendora Hawaiian Gardens Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach Hidden Hills Huntington Park Industry Inglewood Irwindale La Canada Flintridge La Habra Heights Lakewood La Mirada La Puente La Verne Lancaster Lawndale Lomita Long Beach Los Angeles Lynwood Manhattan Beach Maywood Monrovia Montebello Monterey Park Norwalk Palmdale Palos Verdes Estates Paramount Pasadena Pico Rivera Pomona Rancho Palos Verdes Redondo Beach Rolling Hills Rolling Hills Estates Rosemead San Dimas San Fernando San Gabriel San Marino Santa Clarita Santa Fe Springs Santa Monica Sierra Madre Signal Hill South El Monte South Gate South Pasadena Temple City Thousand Oaks Torrance Vernon Walnut West Covina West Hollywood Westlake Village Whittier mp:LCPC1 .................................. .................................. ................................. ►C_HMENT2 LIST OF ENTITIES (PARTIAL LIST) Caltrans Army Corps of Engineers Railroad Rights of Way Federal Hospitals CA0061654 The State University System University of California Campuses National Forest Service Federal Military Facilities [This list will be updated during the permit process to indicate actual identity of agencies and entities.) July 21,• 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members 'of the City Council Recommendation City Council Meeting July 28, 1992 CLARK FIELD MAINTENANCE BUILDING It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council approve the retention of the maintenance building located at the southwest corner of Clark Field in order to allow community volunteers the time to raise the necessary funds to renovate the building. Background There is a small brick (20' X 24') building located at the southwest corner of Clark Field. In the recent past, this building was used to store equipment and supplies for parks maintenance. As Public Work's no longer required the use of this space, the building has not been in use for seven (7) years. Per previous Council direction, staff removed all of the contents of the building in preparation for its eventual demolition. In response to this eventuality, some individuals involved with Hermosa Beach Little League became interested in saving the building which they felt may be of historical value to Hermosa Beach. This building is rumored to have been the locker room for a minor league professional baseball team and may also have some architectural significance. To get the ball rolling on this project, community volunteers formed a group (the Hermosa Conservancy) and made three presentations to the Commission indicating their plan to restore the building with private donations and volunteer labor (see attached). Analysis The presentations made to the Commission reflect the commitment of the volunteers to the task at hand. They request that the Council give them until December, 1993 to raise the estimated $35,000 necessary to complete the project. The Commission was initially concerned that the building would deteriorate further during this waiting period, however, the volunteers indicated that they will also provide the necessary funds and labor to keep the building in a safe and orderly condition until the renovation begins. Public Works staff also said that they will continue to monitor the condition of the building throughout the interim period. 1 lh Once the funds have been raised, the Hermosa Conservancy will work in cooperation with the City to restore the building in compliance with all City codes and to the City's specifications. By approving this request, Council will join the Commission in supporting what will be a substantial volunteer effort. And if the project comes to fruition, the City and residents will benefit with the addition of a historical landmark that can be enjoyed for years to come. ATTACHMENTS 1. Hermosa Conservancy Presentation: May 21, 1992 Commission meeting 2. Hermosa Conservancy Presentation: June 22, 1992 Commission meeting 3. Hermosa Conservancy Presentation: July 16, 1992 Commission meeting Respectfully submitted, Mary e', Director Com u ity Resources Dept. Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager - 3/4 Hermosa Conservancy Established in 1992 to identify American Architecture in Hermosa Beach Dedicated to the enhancement of cultural literacy and the preservation of Hermosa's natural and historical landmarks. in acknowledgement of the American Association for State and Local History; 1400 Eight Avenue South Nashville, Tennessee 37203 May 21, 1992 Parks and Recreation Commission Hermosa Beach, Ca 90254 Re: Preservation of the Hermosa Athletic Building, circa 1922, Clark Field. The last and oldest remaining Brick Structure in Hermosa Beach. ' Dear Ladies and Gentlemen of the Parks Commission: With the advent of today's progress in medical technology life expectancy is up to 100 years without too much discomfort. Gary's and Ben's familiarity with construction technology confirms today's life expectancy for building's is even greater than that. In light of a recent interest generated from a little known building located at the Southwest corner of Clark Field, next to the Little League Baseball diamond, Gary Clark and Ben Ericson have formed the Hermosa Conservancy in their attempt to preserve this building, ...the oldest remaining brick building in Hermosa Beach. Gary and Ben feel that through restoring and preserving this neglected structure it could once again serve a continued and useful purpose storing Hermosa's Little League Baseball equipment, while serving other's with a restored reminder of Hermosa's past. Hermosa has the unique benefit through the existence and preservation of this building to link her architectural history with the historical landmark's recently restored at the Pueblo de Los Angeles. Gary has accepted the responsibility of physically restoring the building to current Bldg Code, for Hermosa's Little League's use. Ben has accepted the responsibility of assisting Gary's effort in his noteworthy enterprise bringing an existing 70 year old building up to current code. Medically speaking, Ben say's it's similar to a heart transplant. "We need donor's, just kidding." Ben's recent review with Mr William Grove, Director of Bldg and Safety for the City of Hermosa Beach, and a Palos Verdes Structural Engineer who has restored over three hundred similar structures, has yielded a positive format for this little brick building's preservation. Mr. Grove's exemplary knowledge of construction technology will provide invaluable assistance to Gary and Ben in their effort's to save this building. Once successfully concluded the building's life expectancy will be extended and thereby conclude with the preservation of an exceptional work in masonry craftsmanship inherent to this ancient structure alone which has been proven attainable under today's Building & Safety seismic requirements. Essentially we will build a new super frame inside the existing structure to support and make safe all of the existing building's characteristic's which contribute to it's intrinsic value. Page 2 May 21, 1992 Letter to Parks and Recreation Commission City of Hermosa Beach, Ca. As Hermosa Beach resident's and parents of children who will directly benefit from the use of this Landmark after it's restoration, Gary and Ben look forward in association with the Hermosa Beach Little League and its parent's that the preservation of this structure will become a valuable asset to the Park's Department, the City of Hermosa Beach, seniors, and its youth in the years to follow. Thank you for your venerable consideration of this worthwhile endeavor. We would deeply appreciate your interest and support. We assure you that you will remain fully informed by Gary Clark on a monthly basis as the work progresses. Please be assured that all State and Municipal Codes and Ordinances will be conformed to with the highest regard to the best professional standards possible. Very truly yours, Gary Clark and Ben E cc: Mr. Wm Grove, Director of HB Bldg do Safety File 9-ferrnosa Conservancy Established in 1992 to identify American Architecture in Hermosa Beach Dedicated to the enhancement of cultural literacy and the preservation of Hermosa's natural and historical .landmarks. in acknowledgement of the American Association for State and Local History, 1400 Eight Avenue South Nashville, Tennessee 37203 June 22, 1992 Parks and Recreation Commission Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 Re: Preservation of Hermosa Athletic Building, circa 1922, Clark Field Hermosa Beach, Ca. Clark Field was named after John W. Clark Hermosa's second and fourth Mayor in 1930 and 1934 Logan Cotton was Hermosa's third Mayor. the youngest Mayor in the country in 1932 Subject Restoration Program submittal: Document -2 follows Petition to Recend Demolition dated 5-21-92: Document -1 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen of the Parks and Recreation Commission: Thank you for your interest and support during our previous testimony concerning this project. Pursuant to our meeting of May 21,1992 the Hermosa Conservancy is pleased to submit for your consideration and review our proposed Restoration Program for the Hermosa Athletic Building located at the South West corner of Clark Field, Hermosa Beach, Ca. The objective of this submittal is to respond with a step by step outline describing the order of our proposed restoration program from start to finish. The program describes the schedule of the work and the services that are needed. Once approved by the Commission after including your recommendations and suggestions we will provide a final draft proposing our time and budget estimate for the approved program. Because the Conservancy has proposed to fund the program we request that costs not preclude your recommendations and suggestions at this time. In this manner we hope the budget will not make itself a recalcitrant issue inhibiting the accelerated preventative maintenance needed to restore this building today. Program Objective: It is the Conservancy's desire to provide an alternative solution for the scheduled demolition of the brick building in the form of a restoration program. This alternative solution is intended to provide a general understanding of contemporary methods employed to preserve older worthy structures such as this pre 1933 brick building. Little League's requested use as storage, preserving its historical significance to Little League, gives the building immediate purpose for its preservation. The building's general historic significance gives additional purpose for its preservation that has been commonly recognized and appreciated as intrinsic value by the general public. Renderings are in progress to graphically describe the proposed work to the Commission. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Page 2 June 22, 1992 Letter to Parks and Recreation Commission City of Hermosa Beach, Ca. Restoration program: Executive Summary: Preservation: H.C. [Hermosa Conservancy] Research: H.C. Documents: H.C. Approvals: City of Hermosa Beach. Construction: H.C. Occupancy: Hermosa Little League Development Program Project Research and Data: H.C. Programming: H.C. Feasibility Study: H.C. Master Plan: H.C. Site Analysis: H.C. Building Evaluation: H.C. Design and Renderings H.C. Project Presentation: H.C. Design Development: H.C. Construction Documents: H.C. Plan Check and Building Permits: H.C. Bidding and Negotiation: H.C. Construction Administration: H.C. Description of Restoration Team and Consultants Restoration Administration and Management: H.C. Restoration Documents: H.C. Restoration Document Engineering Soils -Foundation: City of Hermosa Beach and RI -IS Engineering, Inc. Surveyor -Civil: City of Hermosa Beach and Piai Engineers, Inc. Structural -Seismic: RHS Engineering, Inc. Electrical: Amazahn Electric, Inc. and the City of Hermosa Beach. Mechanical: City of Hermosa Beach. Energy Certification: Math Tec. Construction Administration and Management H.C. General Contractor: Ericson Grand, Gary Clark super. Sub Contractor Trades: General's Job Superintendent: Gary Clark Bldg Dept Sign -Offs: Ben Ericson and Gary Clark Masonry: Precise Concrete Earthwork: Precise Concrete Plumbing -Rough: Pampas Plumbing Electrical -Rough: Amazahn Electric, Inc. Forms -Reinforcing: Precise Concrete Page 3 June 22, 1992 Letter to Parks and Recreation Commission City of Hermosa Beach, Ca. Sub Contractor Trades: [cont] Concrete: Precise Concrete. Misc Steel: Defor's and Hedley's. Gunite: Del Rey Plastering, Inc. Carpentry -Rough: Gary Clark Masonry Restoration: Precise Concrete. Duck Pointing: Precise Concrete Doors and Windows: Gary Clark Carpentry -Finish: Gary Clark. Electrical -Finish: Amazahn Electric, Inc. Insulation: Gary Clark Flashing: Gary Clark Roofing: Gary Clark. Plaster -Drywall: Gary Clark Painter: Dan Kieffer and Gary Clark Millwork -Interiors: Gary Clark and HBLL Flooring: Gary Clark Completion: Certificate of Occupancy to HBLL Dedication: After the Certificate of Occupancy is issued to the Hermosa Beach Little League, Gary Clark will turn the keys over to the President of the Hermosa Beach Little League. The buildings corner stone will have a brass plaque installed with the inscription: Hermosa Athletic Building, Clark Field, Hermosa Beach, Ca. circa 1922. Restored for the Little League of Hermosa Beach in 1992 by the Parks and Recreation Commission. Minutes of the last meeting 5-21-92: Hermosa Conservancy and the Parks and. Recreation Commission. Two years ago, on behalf of Hermosa's Little League, Gary Clark a Local businessman and Little League parent, restored the Clark Stadium Snack Stand. Recently Gary was asked by members of the Board of Directors for Hermosa Beach Little League to inquire whether the oldest remaining brick building Left standing in Hermosa Beach, located three hundred yards South West from the refurbished Snack Stand at the SW corner of Clark Stadium, could be restored for the Little League's use as baseball equipment storage. At that time the building was vacant and scheduled for demolition. In response to this inquiry Mike Flaherty of Hermosa's Public Works who had helped Gary with the previous Snack Stand refurbishment assisted Gary with remedial repairs to the building in order to establish the extent of refurbishment needed to verify the restoration potential pending an on site visit by the Parks and Recreation Commission. On 5-21-92 Gary Clark and Ben Ericson attended the Parks and Recreation Commission's monthly Board meeting for the purpose of expressing an interest and ability to preserve this building for a renewed and better use. It was confirmed the building had recently been vacated by the grounds crew for Clark Field and had been scheduled for demolition by the Public Works Page 4 June 22, 1992 Letter to Parks and Recreation Commission City of Hermosa Beach, Ca. Minutes of the last meeting 5-21-92 [cont] Department for the City of Hermosa Beach for the past year. With the building's present vacancy its demolition became more likely. Mr Flaherty of Public Works expressed regret to Gary over this potential loss as it is one of Hermosa's oldest remaining brick buildings which has not yet been torn down. Gary and Ben requested the Parks and Recreation Commission save the building on behalf of the Hermosa Little League's need for storage and their mutual interest that this benevolent structure served as a thoughtful reminder of Hermosa's historical past. The Biltmore on the Strand had recently been demolished to the regret of many of Hermosa's senior citizens especially Hollie and Katherine Murray who recalled it as the Sand and Sea Club when they reminisced their regret over its demolition during a recent conversation with Mike Lacy and Ben. The building has been confirmed to have a double interlocking brick wall system absent of a steel reinforcing system which would be required today for its construction. The existing construction system indicates that the building was built before 1933 when the building codes were changed requiring additional steel reinforcing in a manner that replaced the previously accepted practice of double wall brick masonry design. The building appears to have been left unattended without this upgrade for more than half a century. This structural correction can be simply remedied similar to providing a tune up for a car. Upon review by a structural engineer a determination was made that Gary would need him to provide remedial seismic reinforcement design for the repair work to upgrade the building's seismic status in accordance to a building permit process mandated by the State of California which would re -register the building as safe with the Department of Building and Safety for the City of Hermosa Beach. In addition to the engineer experienced with this type of brick restoration, a general contractor familiar with brick construction would be an asset for helping Gary coordinate the various trades anticipated useful for electrical and plumbing work thereby indemnify the City of Hermosa Beach during the course of doing the corrective work. Three pre -conditions to Gary's proceeding with the restoration process for this brick building had to be met. These requirements are not similar to the work that was required two years ago when Mike Flaherty of the. Public Works Department for the City of Hermosa Beach had helped Gary with the snack stand refurbishment: which is a newer building made of wood and stucco also restored for Little League's continued use. The three pre -conditions for the restoration are: 1) seismic engineering, 2)building permit to perform seismic work, and 3)workman's comp insurance during the performance of the work.. A meeting to verify the key concerns of the City of Hermosa Beach then transpired between Ben Ericson and Mr. William Grove, Director of Building and Safety for the City of Hermosa Beach. Mr. Grove consented that the brick building was restorable after preliminary review and approval for a variety of structurally acceptable methods with Ben. Each method requires the calculations and services of a structural engineer efficiently familiar with this type of work to prove conformity with codes and facilitate certification of the building permit process to perform the remedial repairs. Page 5 June 22, 1992 Letter to Parks and Recreation Commission City of Hermosa Beach, Ca. Minutes of the last meeting 5-21-92: [cont] From the results of this review meeting Gary and Ben recognized funds other than their services were needed to pay for the pre -conditions established as necessary. A building fund or conservancy was formed by Gary and Ben for the purpose of being able to raise funds to pay for these services on behalf of Hermosa's Little League, in the event that the Parks and Recreation Commission or Hermosa's Little League could not pay for the special expense of this restoration project from their budgets restoring the building's use for Little League's baseball equipment storage. Due to the buildings active listing with the City of Hermosa Beach, the Parks and Recreation Commission's scheduled demolition was a subsequent decision made after no one stepped forth expressing an interest to preserve the building's cultural significance. It was resolved to tear the building down rather than restore it. The salvage value of the bricks was assessed at $2,000.00. Today it is evident this solution occured because no one from the private sector had expressed an interest or provided a written program for the building's restoration such as the one before you today. In the hopes of keeping this restoration simple it was necessary to have Gary of Hermosa's Little League control most of the work, thereby assuring quality control which was Ben's primary concern knowing what was needed and having reviewed a reliable solution with Mr. Grove and Gary. Ben was impressed with the results of Gary's previous work for the snack stand's refurbishment several years before. Gary's work ethic exceeded the results hoped for within a prudent budget. Ben evaluated that Gary's work stresses competency first and foremost. With the assurance from Gary that he would remain responsible as the superintendent, providing executive oversight, for the General Contractor during the restoration process Gary and Ben determined the Hermosa Conservancy would act in an administrative capacity for the restoration. The Hermosa Conservancy's objective is to provide an association of local professionals aligned for the purpose of achieving Little League's request to restore the Hermosa Athletic Building. In so doing they hope to significantly enhance the City of Hermosa's oversight opportunity to follow this project to its fruition and begin reviewing some of its other worthy historic landmarks with.an alternate plan before tearing down any more structures of intrinsic value due to the City's budget restraint and lack of interest through private sector involvement. This concept has been proven cost effective in other parts of the country and achieves a needed variety for defining the character of a town showing a cultural link with its past through restored and new construction. Older building's possess a character newer building's can't resemble or buy. No matter how much money is spent. That's why we have built museums for old art work to preserve a cultural link with our past. _ Gary and Ben then retained the opinions of qualified professionals in their respective fields of knowledge to help implement a preliminary program for the restoration process needed to safely convert the vacant brick building into a storage facility. Page 6 June 22, 1992 Letter to Parks and Recreation Commission City of Hermosa Beach, Ca. Minutes of the last meeting 5-21-92• [cont] The Conservancy's proposed restoration program only addresses the building's essential safety upgrades requested by the Parks and Recreation Commissioner's tentative approval for Little League to use the building for baseball equipment storage and allow a landmark building to continue serving Hermosa's public as a prime example of her historic past. On 5-21-92 Gary Clark and Ben Ericson presented their findings to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Submitted for consideration and review was Hermosa Conservancy's Preservation Petition addressed to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Upon receipt of this document and the Conservancy's testimony responding to the Commission's concerns to the satisfaction of the Board, the Commission approved to temporarily recend their previous instructions to Public Works for demolishing the 70 year old Historic Landmark, provided Gary and Ben would return subsequently with a program and budget for their restoration concept intended to make the building safe for storage purposes. The program draft submitted for your review today is the Conservancy's written response to the Chairmans summary made at the conclusion of the last meeting that such a program be submitted to the Commission for a clear understanding of the extent of the Conservancy's interest and ability to follow through with the responsibilities they had accepted and were so stated within their preservation petition request. This program is intended to serve as a supplement to Hermosa Conservancy's first document submitted before the Commission. Hermosa Conservancy has concluded among its members that the restoration program is easily attainable. The Conservancy has proposed in this program that its services to Little League will conclude when the building in its new restored appearance will continue to serve the children and coaches of Hemrosa's Little League for many years to follow. Hermosa Little League teaches the skills of playing baseball yearly at Clark Field with the assistance of the City of Hermosa Beach's Public Works and the Parks and Recreation Commission. Through the help of volunteers and proud parents within the community hundreds of hours are donated each year coaching the children and educating there to develop a proficiency at playing the game of baseball. It is every parents belief that one of these kids will someday become a major leaguer in one form or another. One need not look far within the crowd's that attend the games for this to be verified as fact, even though most of those parents don't wear baseball uniforms. The fact that they chose to volunteer their services for their children's benefit makes them major leaguer's in their kids eyes as well as many of Herrnosa's resident's. The one's who appreciate the values created by playing baseball in the park. For years it has been rumored by spectator's and player's alike on particularly warm Saturday afternoon's that some of the coaches have even attempted to donate more hours doubling as umpires assistants to the paid umpire wanting to help make calls which they mistakenly had obscured the umpires vision to make. On those occasions had it not been for the discerning eye of parents from the opposing team sharing in this knowledge and mutual ambition alerting the umpire of the Oscar performance of the coach the games outcome might have become more attributable to the coach than the players. Fortunately the kids were the ultimate beneficiaries of those cheerleading sessions as this process assured greater parent turn out and better snack stand sales giving each child the added excitement of participating with their parents in at least one such major league event per season. Page 7 June 22, 1992 letter to Parks and Recreation Commission City of Hermosa Beach, Ca. Minutes of last meeting 5-21-92 [cont] Events similar to these have given Hermosa Little League players lifelong memories of springtime at Clark Stadium contributing a little happiness to their memories while growing up in Hermosa. Hermosa's Little League Season strengthens community involvement through joining neighbors as parents sharing an entertaining cultural interchange which represents the heart beat of the towns prosperity. Through preservation this brick structure which has seen a lot of summers in Clark Stadium will simultaneously reflect Hermosa's baseball past as it is rumored to have served as lockers for a semi pro team years ago when they practiced at Clark Field as well. This is said to have been the original purpose for the little brick buildings construction. Ben mentioned to Gary one day this event was similar to the movie 'Field of Dreams'. In retrospect, the Commission's unanimous approval on 5-21-92 tentatively recending their demolition order has been well received by the coaches who won't have to carry all that equipment back and forth and the parents of the Hermosa Beach Little League. All the kids seem to do is smile a little amazed somebody's finally going to fix it up. Everybody knows if Gary takes on this assignment it will tum out good. The Parks and Recreation Commission noted a provision when recending their demolition order to the Conservancy for commencing their work as contingent upon the restoration process conforming to the economic constraints of the Parks and Recreations budget for Clark Field and that the indemnification for the Little League, the City of Hermosa Beach and the Parks and Recreation Commission requires Hermosa Conservancy's professional compliance and adherence to the Building Codes for the State of California and the Municipal Codes and Ordinances for the City of Hermosa Beach. With this assurance to conform made by the Conservancy at that time the Hermosa Conservancy was given permission to proceed with the preparation and submittal of this program submitted to you today for review. • Hermosa Conservancy I559 PCH # E -21I Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 /3101376-7891 Established in 1992 to identify. American Architecture in Hermosa Beach Dedicated to the enhancement of cultural literacy and the preservation of Hermosa's natural and historic landmarks in acknowledgement of the American Association for State and Local History, 1400 Eight Avenue South Nashville Tennessee 37203 July 16, 1992 Parks and Recreation Commission Hermosa Beach, Ca 90254 Re: Preservation of Hermosa Athletic Building, circa 1922, Clark Field, Hermosa Beach Subject: Restoration Schedule and Budget submittal: Document -3 follows Restoration Program submittal dated 6-22-92: Document -2 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen of the Parks and Recreation Commission: Thank you for your interest and support during our previous testimony concerning this project.We appreciate the oversight capacity your Commission and the City of Hermosa Beach will provide. From our last meeting it was resolved the Conservancy will perform the fund raising and restoration work. Fund raising help has been offered by the Hermosa Beach Little League and local residents. Several professional baseball players providing baseball memorabilia have expressed an interest in saving the building who also reside in the community. Verification of fund raising logistics were performed in May of 1992 through the offices of Benko and Piane CPA's prior to the Conservancy's first written request to the Commission. Pursuant to our meeting of June 22, 1992 the Hermosa Conservancy is pleased to submit for your consideration and review our proposed Restoration Schedule and Budget for the Hermosa Athletic Building located at the south west comer of Clark Field, Hermosa Beach, Ca. The objective of this submittal is to identify the time and expense for the restoration program previously submitted in detail. The. Conservancy has established the restoration cost for the engineering and construction phase to be $ 35,000. This final phase will take seven months to complete from start to finish. Today's submittal of the schedule and budget completes this phase of our proposed development program Documents submitted before the Commission to date are as follows: Doc -1 Preservation Request, Doc -2 Restoration Program, Doc -3 Schedule and Budget. In its concluding testimony before the Commission the Conservancy requests that the Parks and Recreation Commission receive and file the three documents submitted to date as an approved restoration program clearing the way for the Conservancy to move the project forward into the next phase of development -the fund raising. The Conservancy requests the Commission grant them until December of 1993 one and one-half years from now to raise the 5 35,000. necessary for implementing this phase of the program. Very truly yours, Gary C1rk and Ben Ericson cc: Mr. Wm Grove, Director of HB Bldg and Safety Mr. Lynn Terry P.E. Deputy City Engineer, Dept of Public Works SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 7`/S/Y-- July 21,1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 28,1992 RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT REGARDING AGING OF PARKING CITATIONS IN THE COMPUTER SYSTEM Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file this report, regarding the aging of citations in the computer system. Background: During the budget hearings, the City Council requested information regarding the status of all parking citations within our computer system files. The intent was to ascertain the age of the citations, and determine what could be done to get them paid. Analysis: Staff put together a matrix showing the age of the citations and an explanation of the status of each citation (see attachments). The majority of outstanding (open) citations in the system are those that have been issued to out-of-state vehicles or to vehicles rented by people who live in other states. Typically, the person will return home without paying the citation. Through our contract with the Phoenix Group, we can obtain the names and addresses of the registered owners from the DMV's of the other 49 states, and we send out Notices of Delinquent Parking Violation ("Notice"). We utilize all legal remedies to expedite and secure payment of the parking citations; we have obtained the names and addresses of the owners of the vehicles that have been issued a citation(s) and a Notice has been sent or is in the process of being sent. If the citation(s) still remain unpaid after ten (10) days, a penalty is assessed, a lien is placed on the owner's vehicle, and registration will be contingent upon satisfaction of the citations. - 1 - ti Further legislation is necessary to afford the State, cities and counties, etc., additional methods of collecting outstanding parking fines, such as, attaching a person's Social Security Number to vehicle registration. Staff strongly urges the City Council to actively support any such legislation, as it is introduced. Through our association with organizations such as the California Public Parking Association and other parking enforcement related groups, we are kept abreast of pending legislation and newly enacted laws. As new laws are enacted, Staff will make every effort to commence enforcement. Respectfully su mitted, /1- ►.Ii n L. ten, Acting General Services Director Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Viki Copeland, Finance Director • CITATION AGING FISCAL YEAR CITES ISSUED. OPEN STATUS CODE 87' - 88' 91,785 3 2 1,885 845 1 1 23 2 7 IS IQ NS HO PP VS PN AJ RO 2,769 88' - 89' 82, 102 3 868 1,812 2,508 4 98 21 15 19 IS IQ NS HO PP VS PN AJ RO 5,348 89' - 90' 86,417 4 2,103 1,856 7,517 51 571 436 36 37 IS IQ NS HO PP VS PN AJ RO 12,611 90' - 91' 68,625 53 2,410 1,371 7,672 465 1,557 699 1 107 IS IQ NS HO PP VS PN AJ RO 14,335 91' - 92' 62,325 701 2,202 4,116 10,625 356 1,692 191 0 63 IS IQ NS HO PP VS PN AJ RO 19,946 OPEN CITATION STATUS DESCRIPTIONS I8 - ISSUED - Citation which has been issued, but Notice of Delinquent Parking Violation (NDPV)has not yet been sent. IQ - INQUIRY - Registered owner information has been requested from the DMV in order to send NDPV, prior to notifying DMV to withhold registration. The Status remains at an Inquiry state if we are unable to obtain registered owner information. N8 - NOTICE SENT - NDPV sent to registered owner via mail according to statutory requirements. Gives two weeks to pay bail without penalty assessment. Notices sent to out-of-state vehicles stay at the Notice Sent Status. HO - DMV HOLD - Registration of vehicles with outstanding parking citations is contingent upon payment or adjudication of citations. PP PARTIAL PAYMENT - Portion of bail due has been received. V8 - OUT OF STATE REGISTRATION - Vehicle is registered in another state. Requires use of private company to obtain registered owner information, before we can send NDPV. PN - RENTAL/LEASED VEHICLE - Renter or Lessee information must be obtained from the Rental/Lease company in order to forward the NDPV to the responsible party. AJ - ADJUSTED - Data entry error during payment processing which requires correction. RO - BOUNCED CHECKS - Payment of bail remains outstanding due to bounced check, closed account, etc. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS DATE: 7/21/92 RE: GREENBELT PARKING FROM: PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES COMMISSION The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission respectfully request that Council send the plans currently proposed for the creation of long term parking spaces in the City Hall area to the Commission prior to their final presentation to the Coastal Commission. As Council is aware, the Commission reviewed and recommended that Council approve a parking plan for the Greenbelt that would provide for a landscaped lot and parking on a natural surface. This recommendation was presented to the Council at two meetings, the last one on March 24, 1992. Subsequent to this meeting during which the Council voted to close the Greenbelt lot and to implement an alternative parking plan, the City Manager and Planning staff drafted and presented a new plan to the Coastal Commission which we understand is slated for a second review in early August. In a majority sense, we are concerned that Council did not direct staff to present the alternative plan to the Commissions for review prior to its submittal to the Coastal Commission. As the Commission is responsible to provide an in depth look at parks and recreation facilities, parking for facility users becomes an important consideration. The Greenbelt parking lot and parking around the Civic Center area has served many of our recreation facilities including Clark Field, the Community Center and the Greenbelt. If there are to be changes with regards to parking in these areas, we as a Commission feel that we should be given an opportunity to review these changes and to provide input to the Council as appropriate. As indicated at the beginning of this memo, we would like to review the new parking plan at our next regularly scheduled meeting of August 20, 1992. We understand that the City's presentation to the Coastal Commission may be scheduled prior to that time but would ask that you postpone this presentation in order to allow for a review of the proposed plans by this Commission. Noted: Mar ;Jgr'ooney, Director Co,m unity Resources Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Respectfully submitted, tt ani Peirce, rperson Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF THURSDAY, JULY 16, 1992 MEETING ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Peirce, Commissioners Blaco, Crecy, McCurdy, Reviczky Staff: Essingler, Rooney, Staten (GS), Terry (PW) APPROVAL OF MINUTES (June 22, 1992 regular meeting) Motion: "To approve as submitted." Crecy/McCurdy All Ayes LEASE RENEWAL FOR ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS, EASTER SEALS, HOPE CHAPEL AND SOUTH BAY CENTER FOR COUNSELING Motion: "To recommend approval all leases based on staff recommendation with a revision to the ARC lease in which the 5 -year lease option can be canceled on each yearly anniversary." McCurdy/Peirce All Ayes Staff. Note: The Hope Chapel banner needs to state "Meeting Here" when posted at the Community Center. Check into compatibility with City sign ordinances/policies. STAFF REPORT: PABK NG' .. i11IAANCESZMAP= ii17 n_ "The parking plan being prepared for the Coastal Commission should be submitted to the Parks Commission for approval prior to being presented to the Coastal Commission. If the plan is submitted before the next Commission meeting, staff is directed to request City Council to postpone its submission to the Coastal Commission until the Recreation Commission can review it." Reviczky/Crecy Four Ayes, McCurdy - No STAFF REPORT: COST OF PLACING BARRIERS ON GREENBELT Motion: "To table the report until parking plan is finalized for the area." Crecy/Reviczky All Ayes. STAFF REPORT: STATUS OF PARKS AND RECREATION FUND 125 FY 1992-93 Note: Commission would like a copy of the Parks CIP Budget inserted in next month's packet. Would also request that the City treasurer report on the average growth rate of the park and recreation facility Tax Fund on an annual basis. RESTORATION OF BUILDING ON CLARK FIELD Motion: "To recommend granting the Hermosa Conservancy until December, 1993 to raise the $35,000 necessary to preserve the Hermosa Athletic Building. A semi-annual report will be submitted by the conservancy stating the funds raised." Blaco/Peirce All Ayes. Robert Essertier, Mayor City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Calif. 9024 July i-:, 1992 Dear relayor Essertier, At the July 7, 1992 meeting of the Vehicle Parking District, the parking Place Commissioners voted unanimously to convey to the Council our opposition to the City plan to remove public parking from the Greenbelt area adjacent to the Civic Center. As a City Commission dedicated to the creation of new parking, we feel we must advise you of the very negative impact such a move will have on the downtown district. Losing these 100 spaces would cut off vital overflow parking for the downtown businesses during peak times of the year. Not only will this move create an impediment for special events in the downtown/beach area, such as volleyball tournaments, but activities such as movie filming will be greatly restricted due to their many off site parking requirements. This net loss of parking in a city that is desperate for new parking causes us to ask you to re-evaluate your position on this matter. Helene Frost Chairman Board of Parking Place Commissioners cc: Hermosa Beach City Council Nembers Board of Parking Place Commissioners 411 oa- �reitMBC(1- �02� -rb (A -ft iT rnkj co&LetiJ 1 Arn 1-1-1RE6IDEAPT Or- 71-16 Guy A -T Lom4 Irtu, ON LDT Bet}iND My �fUU� A -T � CyPRI h f� C�Pt�eO DiL WELL , � r 1 I--.F_,4K1 /d C ole. AD -The 5,t/1 -7--L CArJ AWFUL.. IF MIE. / naork167 WEST, itl-kJ1� Fix, -1k1l6 02tID1Toti f� 1 }}1 -1 -VE BFPO i7) 1,4D 14 -14c -T- Thi l5 6177M -TIM Is V��y uN--A-c-7NFog me--A-toM y NeicH�, Loc►aki6 INTb 771r6 Pr�otI3LE--ir) AUL I6HIKA-W/4- 371- • 5°245 NET amommommem V City of Hermosa l�each.) Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 June 24, 1992 Mr. Paul Ishikawa 626 Loma Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Re: Stinnett Oil Well - 6th Street and Cypress Dear Mr. Ishikawa: This letter is in response to your letter dated June 19, 1992 regarding the referenced oil well. I contacted the State of California, Department of Conservation, Division of Oil and Gas regarding your complaint. This state agency has jurisdiction over oil well matters. The environmental section indicated that an inspection was performed on Thursday, June 18, 1992, in response to a previous complaint. the oil well was not observed to be leaking; however, there is a well cellar that contained stagnant water which is floating a 6" to 8" layer of crude oil. I also spoke to R.A. Smith of Oil Well Management who manages the well for the Stinnett Oil Company. He indicated that the well cellar is scheduled to be pumped out and cleaned on Wednesday, June 24, 1992. Hopefully, by the time you receive this letter the problem will have been resolved. You should be aware that the oil well on the City Maintenance Yard site, which is in close proximity to the subject site, is periodically vented to release gas pressure. This is done in accordance with Division of Oil and Gas regulations and may result in short term detectable odors. If you have any questions regarding the content of this letter, feel free to contact the undersigned at 318-0235. Yours truly, LoL_Gc William Grove, Director Building and Safety WG/rb cc: Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY TREASURER RE: LETTER FROM PAUL ISHIKAWA - ITEM 4C DATE: JULY 23, 1992 On July 23 I personally visited Mr. Ishikawa at his residence. Together we viewed the Stinnett oil property. We discussed the history of the City's ongoing legal dialogue with Mr. Stinnett. Although Mr. Ishikawa is not pleased that Mr. Stinnett has taken so long to clean up his oil property, he is pleased that the City is continually applying pressure to resolve this nuisance. Also, Paul is extremely pleased that the City Manager Mr. Ferrin took interest in this matter by personally viewing the problem location Gary L. : u sch City Treasurer c.c. Paul Ishikawa June Williams SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 4 c 14,12Mcs i)-ars'cll, e Yca 7/,W . hiv.amos4. laird ('7' sotwed, e� t4ft(-- .-ta rnoso Rtnieii, OP 9cs( --E o4valtnBGvr mbrn$b.AS Df= 77 aouNeie 1 ..!)l - QR tiZS- N tivtiS12611 As; pi -A) !j- STD11 /7 92 .QN 77f6 {�onrr Pi96G- of 7716' NDmn6 AL1 05 -20, 6s/77oic) �f�R-SING (3066'S Fog eokNctLr1'wmfib • ..PS o Ivor R6CA-CL ANY ,s is euss✓aN of 77fL lTbYvj /N CvuNelL 1gn�1� "77�� f}R?/CL. /cJ 3,1 /,T POI/1014S couNClL Po uey 57-PPst. 6- use bP 14A eS As 7a wrier -we -a ft R6v)s I DN `Ta Tib" 7716- pou,CY /tRS +B 6blt) /NsT7T�t7�?� J ANN wNertv (S R 61) /sit) & GrTm r o u7 - �3E-lbw f} CI6-a 12bSPonisr AS 7a Mixt -Tor POLO `J /5) yin/. Ho w/t v/f `' 7tl iS b6S//Z6' Foe. 8,3SC6r CAmG wgO(S Ow E '7a 77J' Common) /T`/, Xliv Ly ffG6- I? -r 77irs t677fi62- GM/1.672/ 1A)/7Tb'n) eDmNluNicf}7AL9 Rom m 771-6- (awe.' fir 'owR NAT" I t(-/ R ✓1767577NG. & \•4.74-C- -4(6-,c446eltt..„4(-77/ Jul _ 8-ec OA), , /Ut iteJ2L VY 1 0 (4-- (111; ja-:e , S-4----rk_8 -C-c> f /21- 4-14A- 21')-4154C- 44, 6-c:it_ V ,, , ra-sv\L--1"--11-kir tL1 (q s dt-VA- (L-t) P -1/4-€C (<t4P-d-Ltia" eic,2 et__ riA_ 52--1,-L A A /107 4e a � `"1-. /tit'- t �-e �-ems ' S St,cA,clt, e S1,k,Lt 1�. -t� �- ►- Gi,62- fik-A-A T-15 .,1--!z.L-4-6 e"--) sx,c C.Jr\ l)\ s, taiL5,-L„-y?‘..6 c. s f- S h-Ps x_j FLt 1- bte- S,L.) fr„ tt, It ad 5t L C c S t f CLh-� fry A-A - J 7.4„_, ph41 Z b a a-ti A.SZ, , • 11 ��- /tit_ r_ it- 19 Cc -,- tfr ebc-5LA P4(//\1( . MA -A- ot._ OVA - mss r L.0-0/ A 5 Sl o.% v -- IN"T / 1.i7 LT -(-14- 4Q_ Q 1.0 -AS a) t-6 cf-ctiro--but_?) t-it-eas n S ; F' r/ ,� July 22, 1992 Elaine Doerfling City Clerk City Hall 1315'Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Ms. Doerfling: I read an article in the Daily Breeze, July 16, 1992, about cars will be ticketed within 20 feet of a house. What do you consider 20 feet, since our street is not 20 feet wide''''' Does the council members sit and think of ways they can screw the community of Hermosa Beach so they can earn a buck!!! I can't believe you would enforce a ridiculous ordinance! Does the city council even care about the people in the community? I have been parking on my red brick driveway for over 15 years and my neighbor over 30 years and our property does not look tacky as stated by Mayor Essertier. 63 JUL 221992 1, I C+► clerk . t . B4 .40. If you take away my are we all going to purchased a parking Your making matters MAJOR problem. parking, which can park up to four cars, tell me where park? There is no residential parking anywhere! I even permit, even though I cannot locate a parking space. worse and not solving the problem, you are creating a If you want to improve the city's look, start cleaning up Hermosa Avenue, re -paving streets, adding colorful flowers and trees and DO remove non -working cars. Please don't take away our only means of parking. Thank you for caring and your understanding. Sincerely, cy . :utled:• :-Tett 935.L ma Drive Herippsa Beach, CA 90254 379-5449 July 14, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of July 14, 1992 CITY RECORDS MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS Background: Since 1907 the City has been accumulating records in each depart- ment and in some which probably no longer exist. There never has, to my knowledge, been a standardized or uniform filing sys- tem; therefore, each department devised their own, never knowing what other departments were doing. As you might imagine, the result is dysfunctional, uncoordinated departmental systems that changes with retirements, resignations, promotions, and new hires. Since each department has its own system - each fearing that it has the only copy, and there is an absence of control over the diverse systems, no retention schedule exists. As a result, every record is retained "just in case...". Now multiply each document by at least two since each department keeps a copy, and you are faced with a truly staggering accumulation of records, both in inactive storage and actively in offices. There is no reliable record of what documents are stored nor any reason or system to their storage location. The records are, in many cases, rat and insect infested and many have been water damaged over decades of storage. The retrieval of records from storage is an enormously tedious, if not impossible task. Storage is scattered at several sites in the City further complicating the issue. The documents are in boxes which are stacked in small areas to which access is both dangerous and limited. In short, we have no records management system. What we have is a monster, and it is a liability to the City as well. There is no disaster recovery plan to protect vi- tal records in case of catastrophe. When a member of the public requests a document that we are required to maintain in an active or inactive file, if it is not in an active file in the office from which it was requested, there is little chance of our being able to locate the document. Requirement: As the number of regulatory agencies has burgeoned over the past three or four decades, the amount of issue documentation has grown exponentially. We are required to provide the public ac- cess to many of those documents. The City cannot afford to let its employees consume vast amounts of time searching for docu- ments and records and as budgets become tighter we must become more efficient if the level of service to the residents of Hermo- sa Beach is to even remain stagnant, let alone improve. The in- ventory of existing records, development of a management system, and its initial implementation is an immense and incredibly com- plex but absolutely required task. 1 Service To Be Received: The product of this program will include: A comprehensive citywide records program including: - An active records program (records inventory); master unified, functional filing system; comprehensive file cross-reference index; records retention schedules; guidance during purge and system implementation; records management manual containing all components of program for ongoing maintenance) - Computerized records management system information assistance - An inactive records program (guidance on organizing in- active records; inactive records locator logs; inactive records procedures) Development of a disaster recovery plan Records would be stored safely and orderly in conformance with federal and state requirements Provide rapid, low-cost access to both active and inactive records - More effective and efficient use of office and storage space - Obsolete records would be disposed of in a legally appropriate and timely manner. Recommendation: The City desperately needs a comprehensive, standardized, and efficient records management system. I do not believe it would be wise to postpone what is much, much more than a repair. This is the establishment of a system. A year or two of postponement will render what has been done thus far of much lesser value. The analysis of this project has been a true "eye opener" for me, and I strongly recommend its uninterrupted pursuit. We can pos- sibly reduce the total cost from $68,500 to $45,500 if we com- plete all of the consultant's work but only equip the vault and follow up next year with a final $23,000 to equip the remainder of the City. The City Clerk regards this as a feasible albeit not especially desirable alternative. I would recommend this incremental approach. The funding source is the most difficult problem. Cognizant of Council's very strong aversion to dipping into reserve for the supplementation of regular expenditures, I only make this recom- mendation because this expenditure is an anomaly and is clearly not a normal, recurring expenditure. This is the sort of thing you might dip into your savings to buy; therefore, I respectfully recommend to the Council that they approve the expenditure of $45,500 from our, still untouched, Unreserved Fund Balance of approximately $1,580,000. This amount represents less than 3% of the reserve funds. Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager ca`2 �v� ��ev� fir✓ /G`�t.c_ July 23, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of July 28, 1992 RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RAISED ON SPECIFIC DEMANDS AND WARRANTS BY COUNCIL AT THE JULY 14, 1992 MEETING 1. Though I have not yet negotiated the amount of the reduction to the retainer with Mr. Vose, I have briefly discussed dis- continuing Ed Lee's attendance at Planning Commission meet- ings. I shall be canvassing the staff to determine the de- gree to which legal services, opinions and advice are sought during Mr. Lee's office hours on every other Tuesday and Casey's office hours every other Thursday and before Council meetings. If their services are not heavily utilized, I shall propose a suitable reduction. Additionally, I shall begin warning department heads that calls to the City Attor- ney for advice, etc. during other than office hours is at a cost in addition to the $3400/month retainer so only the most urgent legal issues will go to the City Attorney at times other than regular office hours. I would hope these reductions would yield us a $500+ savings per month. 2. There is no downtown and VPD maintenance contract since award was disallowed in February of this year. Currently the maintenance of the VPD#1, Pier Avenue between the Strand and Bard, and the Pier itself are being performed on a month to month basis by Specialty Maintenance. I have proposed the in-house assumption of responsibility for some of the downtown cleaning - Pier Avenue from Palm to Ardmore and the Strand from 14th to 15th streets. I have been assured by my superintendent that the assumption of these maintenance functions will have a very minimal effect upon other ongoing activities. The savings to the City is estimated to be $8,750 for this fiscal year. The only downtown maintenance outside the VPD#1 still being performed by contract is on the Municipal Pier which requires intense weekend main- tenance. I have directed Public Works to repackage the RFB and get it correctly readvertised. I would expect to read- vertise not later than the first of September. Last week the Handmans visited me and offered to continue maintaining the VPD#1 and the areas on Pier Avenue, along the Strand and the Municipal Pier for $8,750 less if the City would award the contract to Specialty Maintenance. They point out that this can be done because of the size of the crew they now have in Redondo and that crew's ability to, at minimal cost, do the work I had proposed to take back in-house to save the $8,750. The bottom line is if we award them the contract, Specialty will do everything in the original contract for $8,750 less, and our in-house crews will not have to pick up the additional maintenance responsibility. 3. The two printers maintained for an annual cost of $2500 are the very large P600 and P300 printers. The P600 was pur- chased in 1983 and approximately 6 months later the P300 was purchased to handle the citation notices. Both items were used. The P600 (600 lines per minute) Finance printer is in constant use each day and after 6 pm with reports. The P300 (300 lines per minute is a slower printer made to handle forms) in General Services is used for large print outs, forms, parking notices, mailing labels, and print outs from tapes either received or created. The P300 also has a spe- cial circuit board for barcoding. The approximate costs to replace these printers are: P600 $8,000 P300 6,000 Intertec furnishes "on call" maintenance services Monday thru Friday. Each printer has a HPS10 controller box at- tached to convert information from the Hewlett Packard to the Printronix printer. These controller boxes have been replaced at least twice over the years. The replacement cost for one unit would be approximately $2,500 to $3,000. One QMS 3000 magnum controller board has been replaced, cost approximately $2,400. These units are covered in the Inter- tec contract at no additional charge. The two printers are deployed and used as follows: the first, located in General Services, is the main line printer (P300) and the second (P600) is located in the Finance machine room. P300 1. Main Line printer 2. Barcode circuit boards for citation notices 3. Forms printed are: Business Licenses, new license renewals, delinquent; Parking Permits renewals; Animal License renewals; Finance warrants; Citation notices; mailing labels and various reports P600 1. Finance General Ledger reports; merges; Bud- get reports; Fixed Assets reports 2. Paid citation reports 3. Treasurer reports Due to the constant use of these printers, it is imperative that they remain on line and in good working condition. Responsive and competent support maintenance is essential. 4. Section 28A-20(4) indicates that applicants for temporary signs shall post a bond to guarantee removal of the tem- porary sign. The building official shall establish the amount of said bonddbut the amount shall not exceed $250. 2 Bill Grove spoke with the City Attorney and there is no problem with his establishing the amount at zero ($0) if that is the Council's desire. Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager FRF/ld 3 HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1992 June OFFENSES REPORTED This Month This Month Year to Date Last Year One Year Ago To Date Murder 0 0 0 0 Rape 1 0 5 0 Robbery 1 1 17 14 Assault 15 14 53 71 Burglary (Total) 43 32 221 169 Burglaries (Vehicle) 23 * 108 * Burglaries ( Residential) 19 * 95 Burglaries (Commercial) 1 * 18 * Larceny 62 43 307 325 Motor Vehicle Theft 17 14 93 86 DUI 22 . 36 175 211 All Other Offenses 369 296 1888 1680 Disturbance Calls 302 331 1555 1447 * not seperated prior to 1-92 PERSONS ARRESTED Adults 86 128 523 629 Juveniles 2 —5 38 -41 Criminal Citations 103 120 498 472 Bicycle/Skateboard Cites 23 8 . 24 49 TRAFFIC REPORT ACCIDENTS Fatal 0 0 1 0 Injury 11 11 66 53 Property Damage Only 34 39 190 174 CITATIONS Traffic 335 558 1908 2302 Parking 4 15 99 71 CALLS FOR SERVICE Total Calls 2272 2777 13634 16267 ** indicates information unavailable Noted: R:- i►k ully b , itted, ',li v.:. Rick Ferrin, City Manager Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety Honorable Mayor and - Members of the City Council ACTIVITY REPORT DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY JUNE, 1992 July 20, 1992 Attached for your information are recap sheets of department activity for the month of June. Overall permit activity increased in June as the department issued 81 per- mits of which 37 were building permits. Two permits were issued for con- dominium projects (four dwelling units) and twenty-nine permits were issued for alterations or additionstoexisting-dwellings:-Five permits were is- sued for alterations to commercial buildings. One dwelling unit was de- molished resulting in a_net increase of three .dwelling units to the housing inventory. The department also processed sixty-four plans for zoning review, plan check or revisions. Plan processing "turn around" averaged one week during June. The department conducted 189 inspections during June not including complaint investigations Building Department general fund revenue for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1992 is $276,417.05 or 85.2% of projected revenue.Total revenue for all funds is $430,476.68. The Business License division reports that 365 licenses were issued during June resulting in revenue of $87,503.49. Business License revenue for the fiscal year exceeded projected revenue by 7.5%. The department logged 30_ new code enforcement complaints during June, of which one was for an illegal dwelling unit. The department closed two cases in June and currently has twenty-eight illegal dwelling unit cases under investigation. The June report on recycling participation levels and refuse diversion is attached to this report. The report indicates that the participation level (at least one recyclable item set out) averaged 63% in June. The total volume of recyclable materials collected in June totaled 181.3 tons and represents a diversion of 23.5% of the residential refuse that would otherwise likely end up in a landfill. Respectfully Submitted, William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety Noted: Frederick R. Ferrin - City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH-- BUILDING EACH_ `.BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT Month of JUNE 1992 NUMBER OF THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY PERMITS CURRENT MONTH LAST FY DATE TO DATE Building 37 23 343 302 Plumbing 25 34 272 287 Electric 24 20 212 206 Plan Check 26 14 220 196 Sewer Use 2 0 15 10 Res. Bldg. Reports 22 21 202 249 Comm. Inspections 18 28 253 309 Parks & Recreation 0 0 7 1 In lieu Park & Rec. 2 0 9 16 Board of Appeals 0 0 0 0 Sign Review 3: 2, 66 57 Fire Flow Fees 11 3 65 58 Legal Determination 0 0 2 0 Zoning Appeals 0 0 0 0 TOTALS .170 145 1,666• 1,691 -- FEES Building** 15,454.47 6,060.30 130,356.13 189,225.20 Plumbing 1,335.85 3,250.00 19,325.65 21,852.45 Electric 2,297.15 1,854.00 22,710.39 27,184.00 Plan Check 7,512.90 3,802.83 77,956.29 147,915.25 Sewer Use 2,488.04 0 10,574.13 7,094.54 Res. Bldg. Reports 918.50 _840.00 8,252.25 9,850.00 Comm. Inspections -751.50 1,120.00 10,458.52 9,900.00 Parks & Recreation 0 0 24,500.00 3,500.00 In lieu Park & Rec. 20,792.00. 0 67,442.00 111,540.00 Board of Appeals 0 0 0 0 Sign Review 251.25 160.00 5,266.50 1,600.00 Fire Flow Fees 8,573.00 2,098.00 51,542.82 145,123.07 Legal Determination 0 0 2,092.00 0 Zoning Appeals 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 60,374.66 19,185.13 430,476.68 674,784.51 VALUATIONS 1,515,686 481,212 11,449,134 21,588,102 **Includes State Seismic Fee $174.58 Revenue: BUSINESS LICENSE MONTHLY REPORT 87,503.49 77,825.19 Licenses issued: 365 306 527.222.78 457,605.83 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED Month of JUNE 1992 TYPE OF STRUCTURE DWELLING UNITS PERMITS PROVIDED VALUATION 1. Single Dwellings 2. Duplex Dwellings 3. Triplex Dwellings 4. Four Units or More 5. Condominiums 2 6. Commercial Buildings 7. Industrial Buildings 8. Publicly Owned Buildings 9. Garages - Residential 10. Accessory Buildings 11. Fences and Walls 4 864,000 12. Swimming Pools 13. Alterations, additions or repairs to dwellings 14. Alterations, additions or repairs to Commercial Bldgs-:- -5- 15. Alterations, additions or repairs to indus. bldgs. 16. Alterations, additions or repairs to publicly owned bldgs. 29 442,436 209,250 17. Alterations, additions, repairs to garages or accessory bldgs. 18. Signs 19. Dwelling units moved 20. Dwelling units demolished 1 21. All other permits not listed TOTAL PERMITS: 37 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: 1,515,686 ** TOTAL DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED : 4 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DEMOLISHED: 1 NET CHANGE: +3 NET DWELLING UNIT CHANGE FY 91/92 +14 CUMULATIVE DWELLING UNIT TOTAL: 9697 (INCLUDES PERMITS ISSUED) ** Revised figure based on land use study by the Planning Dept. -- i :M1 I; CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RECYCLENOW REPORT JUNE 1992 TRASH YDWST TOTAL ONP DATE RATE ACTUAL MAX 7 DIV. TONSTONS MIXED COMM GLASS TIN ALUM PET HDPE MIXED WST/TONS 6/1 57.67. 1,050 1,823 27.7% 27.42 10.5 15,720 4,071 426 6/2 62.8% 1,021 1,627 27.77. 26.88 10.3 14,600 4,571 548 6/3 69.97. 1,047 1,497 27.7% 25.82 9.9 14,680 4,208 355 6/4 65.5% 1,023 1,562 26.07. 26.35 9.3 13,590 4,026 427 6/8 54.2% 988 1,823 22.07 38.2 10.8 15,950 4,203 534 6/9 63.3% 1,030 1,627 21.57. 37.83 10.4 15,450 4,119 442 6/10 66.57. 995 1,497 21.7% 36.7 10.2 14,610 4,440 473 6/11 68.4% 1,068 1,562 20.8. 37.08 9.B 14,160 4,095 465 6/15 56.27. 1,025 1,823 22.87 37.54 11.1 16,220 4,797 433 6/16 63.27. 1,028 1,627 21.57 37.18 10.2 14,690 4,609 489 6/17 69.77. 1,044 1,497 21.07 35.35 9.4 13,520 4,042 485 6/18. 65.47 1,021 1,562 20.7. 35.72 9.3 13,500 3,978 416 6/22 55.27. 1,006 1,823 22.7% 31.79 9.3 14,100 3,734 315 6/23 65.97 1,073 1,627 24.0% 32.1 10.1 14,760 . 4,261 454 6/24 70.1. 1,050 1,497 24.77. 30.54 10.0 14,740 4,173 448 6/25 66.2% 1,034 1,562 27.0% 30.24 11.2 16,520 4,438 564 6/29 54.5. 993 1,823 22.77. 31.84 9.3 13,450 4,231 382 6/30 66.4% 1,081 1,627 24.87. 31.2 10.3 14,960 4,232 481 216 116 247 184 232 168 244 197 160 72 211 144 155 94 139 129 206 133 306 178 184 174 179 205 131 166 285 195 222 141 292 142 166 113 279 148 r, 177 108 159 174 205 148 216 174 211 113 242 180 142 64 187 128 126 158 274 197 187 176 181 165 217 140 323 188 146 99 246 126 229 145 302 201 TOT 63.07. 18,577 29,486 23.57 589.8 181.3 265,220 76,228 8,137 3,312 2,328 4,312 3,055 744.5 BREAKDOWN OF 771.1 TONS OF RESIDENTIAL REFUSE: 76.57 BREAKDOWN OF 1515.6 TONS OF TOTAL CITY REFUSE: 38.97. 0 0 0 0 O 4 0 a O 0 0 C L TOTAL ONP COMM TONS MIXED GLASS TIN ALUM. PET HDPE MIXED WASTE/TONS C BREAKDOWN OF 181.3 TONS OF RECYCLABLES: 1007. 73.17. 21.07. 2.27. 0.97. 0.67. 1.27. 0.87. BREAKDOWN OF 771.1 TONS OF RESIDENTIAL REFUSE: 23.57. . 17.27. 4.9/ 0.57 0.2% 0.27 0.37 0.27. L BREAKDOWN OF 1515.6 TONS OF CITY REFUSE: 12.07 8.77. 2.57. 0.3% 0.17. 0.17. 0.17. 0.17 49.17. L AVERAGE WEEKLY VOLUME OF CITY REFUSE: 336.8 AVERAGE WEEKLY VOLUME OF COMMERCIAL REFUSE: 165.4 AVERAGE WEEKLY VOLUME OF RESIDENTIAL REFUSE: 131.1 AVERAGE WEEKLY VOLUME OF RECYCLABLE MATERIAL: 40.3 RESIDENTIAL PARTICIPATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RECYCLENON 81111111111111$$1111111111111111 SUMMARY REPORT 11111181111811 • WEIGHT OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS TRASH COMM CITYWIDE YDNST TOTAL ONP WASTE I MONTH RATE ACTUAL MAX. I DIV. TONS TONS MIXED GLASS TIN ALUM. PET HDPE MIXED TNS DIVERSION JUNE 63.02 18,577 29,486 23.5I 589.8 181.3 265,220 76,228 8,137 3,312 2,328 4,312 3,055 744.5 12.02 JULY AU6UST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY YTD AVG. 63.02 18,577 29,486 23.51 590 181 265,220 76,228 8,137 3,312 2,328 4,312 3,055 745 12.02 REDEMPTION DOLLARS RECEIVED YTD JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY TOTAL ONP/MIXED: TONS 132.6 147.6 4 PER TON 415 N.A. TOTAL 41,989.15 41,989.15 COMMINGLED: TONS 48.7 48.69 $ PER TON 440 N.A. TOTAL 41,947.60 41,947.60 TOTAL 43,936.75 43,936.75 0 0 c c 0 0 e c 0 0 c e c July 16, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council July 28, 1992 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT JUNE ACTIVITY REPORT Concluded recruitment for Public Works Director/City Engineer. Coordinated transfer of Third Party Administration Contract for Liabililty Claims to Colen & Lee. Current This Month FY to Last FY to STATISTICAL SECTION: Month Last Year Date to Date Worker Comp Claims: Claims Opened 5 5 44 47 Claims plosed 15 1 63 54 Total Open 62 81 62 81 Lost Time (Manhours) Safety 156 * 2,624 * Non -safety 370 * 4,143 * Liability Claims: Claims opened 5 3 53 36 Claims closed 12 4 65 26 Total open 32 39 32 39 Employee Involved Vehicle Accidents: Safety 0 * 6 Non -safety 1 * 8 Employee Turnover: Safety 0 Non -safety 1 * 12 * 1 * * Information not maintained in this format last fiscal year. 1 l General Appropriations Secretary: The following summary indicates the amount of the assigned functions: June: 180 hours available Word Processing 72% (130 hrs) Avg. 7 hrs/day Mail Processing 8% (16 hrs) Avg. 1 hr/day of time spent on each Directory/Dept Support 20% (34 hrs) Avg. 2 hrs/day Word Processing Services by Department: Finance : 35% (45 hrs) Public Works .• City Manager: 8% (10 hrs) Personnel .• City Clerk 1% ( 1 hr ) Community Resources: Respectfully Submitted, Robert A. Personnel pers/act Blackwood, Director and Risk Management Noted: 26% 18% 12% Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager (34 (24 (16 hrs) hrs) hrs) July 1, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City Council Meeting of July 28, 1992 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES JUNE 1992 ACTIVITY REPORT The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of June: RECREATION PROGRAMMING June 2 - The Summer Slow Pitch League opened and closed with registration reaching full capacity of 30 teams in the co-ed and men's divisions. The league began on June 14 and will continue for 10 weeks. $11,550 was collected in registration fees. June 9 - All summer recreation programs opened to Hermosa Beach residents. On June 16th non-residents were able to register for the summer recreation programs. Currently there are 1,669 participants enrolled and $53,959 in revenue was collected. June 11th - The Hermosa Beach Drought Tolerant Demonstration Garden (on the Greenbelt adjacent to the school) was planted by Hermosa Valley School Youth. The garden was funded by the West Basin Municipal Water District ($2,600). The project was made possible through a partnership between the City, the Hermosa Valley School and the West Basin Municipal Water District. Individuals are encouraged to visit the garden and learn a little about drought tolerant plants (see attached). June 13 - A California Beach Volleyball Association (CBVA) Doubles Tournament was held for Men's Masters and Boys/Girls High School Teams at the 8th Street Courts, 26 teams participated. Sponsors included the Charthouse and La Playita. June 20 - A CPR course was offered to the residents of Hermosa Beach by the Hermosa Beach Fire Department. 25 participants took advantage of this free course. June 20 - A Horseback Ride/Dinner excursion took 35 riders on a 4 hour ride through the Hollywood Hills and Griffith Park. The riders hitched their horses and ate Mexican food for dinner. June 27 - The 2nd "Skate Safe" Safety Clinic was held on the Hermosa Valley School black -top. The clinic was free to both youth and adults who were advised on safety equipment, skating control and skating legal in Hermosa Beach. Instruction was provided by Hermosa Beach Police Department and the staff from Roller Skates of America, 35 people attended. June 29 - The Beach Summer Blast began with 150 children enrolled. The annual summer day camp offers fun filled days of • sports, crafts, beach and special excursions. Approximately $15,000 was collected in registration fees. SPECIAL EVENTS The Women's Professional Volleyball Association held a Pro -Volleyball event on June 12, 13 and 14. Spectator crowds were estimated at an average of 3,000 per day. The City collected approximately $5,500 in permit fees. June 23 - The Los Ninos organization held a Walk-a-Thon to Mexico which began at Our Lady of Guadalupe School. 200 walkers began their long trek to raise money to improve the quality of life for Mexican children and their families. June 27 - The Crohns & Colitis Foundation sponsored a bike ride through the City. Approximately 500 bike riders passed through the City in an effort raise money for the foundation. COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION The Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation completed its 1992 Concert Series with Bobby Lyle performing in the Civic Theatre on June 6. Mr. Lyle played two 45 minute sets to a small but responsive audience and concluded with a standing ovation. A new Community Theatre group presented "The Heidi Cronicles", which opened on June 12. The play, funded by the Foundation and performed by volunteers, will run every Friday and Saturday through July 18th. This first attempt at live Community Theatre has had a positive response with approximately 100 in the audience nightly. Filming Two film permits were processed in the month of June. Approximately $28,000 was collected in permit, police and parking fees. Facility 6/92 User Hours 6/91 User Hours Field 246 180 Theatre 83 58 Clark 194 182 Gym 190 190 Room 7 20 10 Room 8 155 112 Room 10 175 93 Room 12 107 112 DEPARTMENT REVENUE Current This month FY. Last FY Month Last FY To Date To Date $83,177 $59,046 $376,984 $342,245 Revenue Projection: $321,000 Community Resources Department general fund revenue for 100% of the fiscal year is $376,984 or 117% of the projected figure. Community Resources Department general fund expenditure for 100% of the fiscal year is $354,300 or 98% of the budget FY 1991-92. Respectfully submitted, Cel'e LZ?e& Noted: Mary C. Rorector Dept. of ommunity Resources Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Carol Bel ser , /,276, Recreation Specialist Dept. of Community Resources 4. '-oc• LA•trxi-JAS '12A0IAc>"IOI4 LA a1& I!3 � -HiUM fP..stuceL)t 1 -0.a. rOF h'WdJEIRA 144-trAtIA ' RADvsnD i oggsi-L-5 1.41i-74-46- 3 1,1A1.- 4vot-Ig M ELJ& t I I 4-0�I :Co 1 kt.YoroorlE t+E-UeS1-1 I L. I r�.u 5 14 -1154e -Z.11 Ag.OMDRE- sr - 1 10 6a06A14NI urs•. b: K • • E� 4odd% & Pvrt1{ ice! :. • .. • r Arsft�itk►k c 14147 LY7 ealo .ea tiviu.ra• I �� c4U �� t M FRot4T of • 12 c- i of+u5 oWS t+om CAR4161.. C- PER. 1/A Y oczAvG" 1 7 1Vc.}1.1ufri FIIhTUoSuH 31- o.e.• r of of t cEIRA- Lawrence. D. LAWRENCE R MOSS ASLA i.a R. & ASSOCIATES INC. 3458 OCEAN B M O s s 818 248 5200A VIEW BLVD &Associates LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT JUNE 1992 STAFF REPORTS PREPARED JULY 21, 1992 Regular Meeting of JULY 28 , 1992 MEETINGS / SEMINARS MEETINGS 34 31 350 367 CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES INITIAL INSPECTIONS THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE APPEAL / CITY COUNCIL RECONSIDERATION 0 2 1 1 2 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CONDO) 2 0 1 4 2 7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (COMMERCIAL) 3 1 2 0 4 7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 0 0 1 4 1 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION/REVOCATION 0 3 2 8 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/ MAP EXTENSION 2 0 1 0 3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 0 0 0 FINAL MAP 0 0 1 3 1 8 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 1 2 2 6 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 0 0 1 NONCONFORMING REMODEL 0 0 9 4 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 0 1 2 3 PARKING PLAN 0 0 3 4 SPECIAL STUDY 0 0 1 3 0 SUBDIVISION 0 0 2 4 TEXT AMENDMENT 0 1 5 1 1 TRANSIT 2 0 10 4 VARIANCE 1 0 4 3 ZONE CHANGE 0 0 6 18 MISCELLANEOUS 9 8 8 6 4 2 MEETINGS / SEMINARS MEETINGS 34 31 350 367 CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES INITIAL INSPECTIONS 3 20 115 167 FOLLOW UP INSPECTIONS 1 3 11 141 114 LETTERS GENERATED 2 12 1 69 253 MEMOS GENERATED 2 5 3 9 69 C.U.P. ACCEPTANCE FORMS RECEIVED 2 2 31 31 C.U.P. COVENANT FORMS GENERATED 3 18 4 6 24 C.U.P. COVENANT FORMS RECEIVED 1 1 4 3 6 CITATIONS ISSUED 0 0 1 1 C.U.P. VIOLATIONS ABATED 1 1 7 140 61 COMPLIANCE CHECK 3 N/ A 3 N/ A I OTHER DEPARTMENTS' REQUESTS OTHER DEPARTMENTS' REQUESTS 7 I N/A 18 L N/A WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP MUNICIPAL AREA EXPRESS (MAX) RIDERSHIP BEACH ROUTE 1 1631 I 1401 17633 17152 BUDGET (FOR 100% OF FY) EXPENDITURE (COMPARE TO BUDGET ESTIMATE) THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE HERMOSA BEACH PASSENGERS 1 697 1024 21 220 10081 REDONDO BEACH PASSENGERS 5016 4462 57921 47883 SATELLITE PASSENGERS 387 330 5296 4384 MUNICIPAL AREA EXPRESS (MAX) RIDERSHIP BEACH ROUTE 1 1631 I 1401 17633 17152 BUDGET (FOR 100% OF FY) EXPENDITURE (COMPARE TO BUDGET ESTIMATE) 7%- 25 %- REVENUE (COMPARE TO BUDGET ESTIMATE) 20%+ 35 %- The Following Activities Were Undertaken for Transit Projects 1. Routine tasks. .> Upcoming Agenda Items to City Council 1. Text amendment to the zoning oridance to lower the allowable height in R-3 & R -P zones. 2. Appeal of the Planning Commision's denial of a variance at 336 The Strand. Long Term Projects Underway 1. Recovering permit authority from Coastal Commission. 2. Updating zoning ordinance for compliance with current law, clarification of intent, and procedural correctness. 3. Continue work on oil drilling project. 4. Updating Land Use Element and other General Plan Elements. Michael Schubach Planning Director N ),EED: &;- Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Respectfully submitted, Yu -Yang Ting Administrative Aide July 21, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 28, 1992 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - JUNE 1992 The Public Works Department is divided.into three (3) major functions:. Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration function coordinates and divisions of the Public Works Department in the City Council and City Manager; includes capital improvement projects. Permits Issued: Type Current Month Last FY To Date blends the efforts of all accomplishing the directives of. engineering and management of This Month FY Last FY To Date Sewer Demolition Sewer Lateral Street Excavation Utility Co's only Dumpster/Strand} Banner Permits The O 0 1 0 5 5 125 0 O 1 O 0 Capital Improvement Projects ENGINEERING CIP 85-137 FAU, Asphaltic Over- lay, Valley, Ardmore & Prospect CIP 89-144 Strand Walk & Walkway CIP 89-150 Misc. Traf. Sig. Imp. CIP-89-513 CIP 90-151 Traf. Eng. Program 6 25 9 15 60 91 233 387 35 8 19 17 which are currently in progress are: CIP 91-165 CIP 86-176 CIP 88-201 MAINTENANCE Misc Bikeway Const. Traf. Control Pre-emp. Light Conversions & New Installations Development of 5 Lots Edith Rodaway Friendship Park The maintenance function of the Public Works following sections: - Parks/Medians - Street Maintenance/Sanitation - Sewers/Storm Drains - Street Lighting Department is divided into - Traffic. Safety - Building Maintenance - Equipment Service the Parks Division/Medians: Repaired irrigation City-wide. Trimmed trees City-wide. Began new irrigation system around Base 3. Spread new chips on greenbelt. Street Maintenance/Sanitation: Continued patching cracks in Strand. Re -installed all parking signs for greenbelt parking. Repaired barricades on Beach Drive at 17th Street and 3rd Street. Chained new trash barrels in place on the fishing pier. Repair.ed curbs and sidewalks City-wide. Removed graffiti City-wide. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Rodded troubled areas in sewer system. Repaired high pressure sewer line under the fishing pier. Street Lighting: Street lighting repairs (after dark patrol). Installed . new conduit from computer room to dispatch in Police Department. Installed new lighting system in gym at Community Center. Traffic Safety Division: Replacing all old signs and poles (if needed) in area 2. Finished pouring concrete around new light poles at Montgomery & Aubrey Court. Painted curbs City-wide. Replacement of damaged or knocked down regulatory signs City-wide. Building Maintenance Division: Performed painting and tree trimming outside of 6th Street school. Patched concrete outside of Community Center. Due to graffiti, painted restrooms at Valley Park. Repaired roof at Clark Building. Equipment Service: On-going maintenance of City vehicles and equipment. Graffiti Removal: JULY 1990 AUGUST 1990 SEPTEMBER 1990 OCTOBER 1990 NOVEMBER 1990 DECEMBER 1990 JANUARY 1991 FEBRUARY 1991 MARCH 1991 APRIL 1991 MAY 1991 JUNE 1991 YTD TOTAL 39.75 48.00 30.00 81.50 79.00 41.00 33.75 29.50 35.00 70.75 40.50 21.50 Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE 1991 59.50 1991 27.00 1991 43.50 1991 37.50 1991 24.00. 1991 27.00 1992 19.50 1992 14.50 1992 34.00 1992 12.00 1992 49.00 1992 29.00 Hrs. Hrs. (Revised) Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. 550.25 Hrs. YTD TOTAL 376.50 Hrs. Respectfully submitted, ( AAA-- (0/VA—le_ William Grove Acting Director of Public Works mon2/pwadmin No ed: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT JUNE 1992 ACTIVITY REPORT Parking Cites Issued Vehicles Impounded/Booted Calls Responded To Booting Revenue Dismissals processed Citations Issued Warnings Issued Complaints Responded To - Total Number of Animals Picked -Up of which: Returned to Owner Taken to Shelter Injured, taken to Vet Deceased CONCUR: J Henry L. Staten, Acting General Services Director Fredrick R. Ferrin, City Manager PARKING ENFORCEMENT Current Month 6,445 32 147 $8.949 721 14 2 88 51 8 32 (3) (18) This Month Last Year 6,507 11 114 $1 ,331 421 ANIMAL CONTROL 38 0 148 72 21 32 4 15 June 11, 1992 City Council Meeting of June 23, 1992 Fiscal Year To Date 62,325 395 1,359 $78,832 6,084 467 4 998 632 199 425 (16) (228) Last Fiscal Year To Date 68,625 418 1,706 $43,379 1,866 Respectfully submitted to, Henry L. Staten, Acting General Services Director by Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide 403 0 726 639 188 187 56 213 COMMENTS: Positive enforcement of the Public Information Program, has reduced the number of citations issued. (2) IOD's, (2) vacant full-time positions, and (1) deleted part-time position, contributed to the -reduced cite count. Dismissed citations reflect only citations dis- missed during the month, not June exclusively. Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Parking Cites Issued GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MAY 1992 ACTIVITY REPORT PARKING ENFORCEMENT Current Month 5,695 Vehicles Impounded/Booted 87 Calls Responded To 148 Booting Revenue $2,114.50 Dismissals processed 424 Citations Issued Warnings Issued Complaints Responded To Total Number of Animals Picked -Up of which: Returned to Owner Taken to Shelter Injured, taken to Vet Deceased CONCUR: `HenPy L. Staten, Acting General Services Director Fredrick Ferrin, City Manager 18 0 118 80 13 75 (3) (31) This Month Last Year 4,497 20 162 $3,531 197 ANIMAL CONTROL 39 0 64 74 25 24 4 21 June 11, 1992 City Council Meeting of June 23, 1992 Fiscal Year To Date 55,880 363 1,212 $69,883 5,363 453 2 908 581 191 393 (13) (210) Last Fiscal Year To Date 62,118 407 1,592 $42,026 1,445 Respectfully submitted to, Henry L. Staten, Acting General Services Director by 365 0 578 567 167 155 52 198 Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide COMMENTS: Positive enforcement of the Public Information Program, has reduced the number of citations issued. (2) IOD's, (2) vacant full-time positions, and (2) vacant part-time positions, contributed to the reduced cite count. Dismissed citations reflect only citations dis-, missed during the month, not May exclusively. HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1992 Jun 30. 1992 I FIRE STATISTICS This Month This Month Year to Date Last Year One Year Ago To Date Total Calls 65 48 336 340 (types) False Alarms 3 1 26 23 Mutual Aid I 3 0 10 3 Paramedic assists 22 24 147 174 Residence Fire 2 1 26 20 Commercial Fire 2 5 10 20 Vehicle Fire 3 1 10 13 Hazardous Mtls. 7 4 22 20 Other 23 13 85 71 PARAMEDIC STATISTICS Total Responses 70 78 381 446 (types) No Patient/aid 8 4 24 31 Medical 19 34 172 182 Trauma 43 40 191 223 Auto Accident 14 13 69 81 Assault 15 10 42 __ 46 Jail Call 4 3 19 23 Transports 39 39 188 188 Base Hosp. Con. 17 28 117 155 Trauma Center 1 2 4 6 STRAND AND BEACH CALLS Medical only 4 2 14 10 Ocean Accident 0 0 2 0 Beach Accident 0 0 0 0 Bike v Bike 0 0 0 0 Bike v Ped 1 1 2 2 Fall off Bike 0 1 0 3 Skater v Skater 0 0 0 0 Skater v Ped 0 0 0 0 Fall off Skates 0 1 3 10 Bike/Skater v Other 0 1 1 3 Assault 1 0 3 2 INSPECTIONS and PREVENTION (primary) Commercial 47 70 327 461 Assembly 0 0 1 0 Institutions 0 0 3 0 Industrial 0 0 10 0 Apartments 66 26 216 213 (re—inspections) Commercial 40 37 158 248 Assembly 0 0 0 0 Institutions 0 2 6 2 Industrial 0 0 6 0 Apartments 39 30 170 246 Fumigations 12 8 67 51 Noted: Respe i Submit ed: ..... ICS l.1..,_ . imari I ` Frederick Ferrin, City Manager Steve S. Wisniewski, Director of Public Safety July 21, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 28, 1992 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, JUNE 1992 - Two budget workshops were held in June; a balanced budget was adopted June 30, 1992. - The Finance Director participated in the interview panel for liability administrators and data processing pilot program vendors. - Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) representatives visited the City to go over guidelines for preparing reimbursement requests for costs related to the civil unrest in Los Angeles. STATISTICAL SECTION M NNTHTHNT ITLASTS MFYTH DATEFY D I TOST FY DATE CITATION PAYMENTS 4,299 4,163 41,366 50,775 INVOICES 7 10 167 140 CASH RECEIPTS 2,821 2,140 21,688 21,550 WARRANTS 205 246 3,684 3,439 PURCHASE ORDERS 234 369 4,091 4,338 UUT EXEMPTIONS 700 669 FILED TO DATE PAYROLL FULL TIME 161 160 PART TIME 71 65 DISCOUNTS TAKEN $ 160.98 $ 2,419.24 Noted: NZeiL)/el/-4-t—D 14.-{;(1/4144-4-) Frederick R. Ferrin Viki Copeland City Manager Finance Director