HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/10/92/0 7.i
"The most important political office is that
of private citizen." -Louis Brandeis
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, November 10, 1992 - Council Chambers, City Hall
MAYOR
Robert Essertier
MAYOR PRO TEM
Albert Wiemans
COUNCILMEMBERS
Robert Benz
Sam Y. Edgerton
Kathleen Midstokke
Closed Session - 7:00 p.m.
Regular Session - 7:30 p.m.
CITY CLERK
Elaine Doerfling
CITY TREASURER
Gary L. Brutsch
CITY MANAGER
Frederick R. Ferrin
CITY ATTORNEY
Charles S. Vose
All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND.
The Council receives a packet with detailed information and
recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda
packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart-
ment, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City
Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting a packet
also is available in the Council foyer.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any
items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time.
(Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard
during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one
minute. Citizens also may speak:
1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public
Hearings,
2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of
items appearing under Municipal Matters, and
3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen
Comments".
1.
CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters
will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the
majority consent of the City Council. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless good cause is
shown by a member prior to the roll call vote.
* Councilmember requests to remove items from the
Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered
1
y,.
Where there is no vision the people perish...
HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating
in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your
interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often.
Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the
next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the
weekend before the meetings.
Opportunities for Public Comments
Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or oral-
ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's
or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included
in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet com-
pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting.
Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual
basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the
notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the
Council.
It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be-
gin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas
are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time
allowed.
Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M.,
Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays.
There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers.
(over)
THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT
Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager
appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council
policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager,
operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of'.policy
making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form
of City government in the United States today.
GLOSSARY
The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most
agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council.
Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one
vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may
remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered
under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion.
Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by
law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni-
ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being
heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the
Hearing.
Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or
public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading
introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may
adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or-
dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances
are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements.
Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions
or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of. Council by
letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday
preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the
Council agenda.
Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion
by the City Council are placed here.
Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi-
nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action
by the City Council.
Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the
agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding
Wednesday.
Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council
may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council.
Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention
of a Council member after publication of the Agenda.
under Agenda Item 3.)
* Public comments on the Consent Calendar.
(a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of
the City Council held on October 27, 1992.
(b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants
Nos. through inclusive.
(c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future
Agenda Items.
(d) Recommendation to receive and file the October, 1992
investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary
L. Brutsch dated November 4, 1992.
(e)
Recommendation to award towing service and storage
garage bid for the Police Department to Frank Scotto
Towing. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve
Wisniewski dated October 28, 1992.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES.
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
* Public comments on items removed from the Consent
Calendar.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS.
(a)
Letter from Chamber of Commerce dated October 31, 1992,
requesting bagging of the silver posted meters in VPD
district for month of December; also to close Pier
Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and Beach Drive from 5:00
to 7:30 p.m. December 2 for annual tree lighting ceremo-
ny. Recommended Action: To approve the Chamber's
requests.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M.
5. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION REGARDING KING HARBOR
HOTEL TO BE LOCATED AT 125 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memo-
randum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated
November 3, 1992.
6. PROPOSEDDINANC,EIFOR TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING ES-
TABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR OR TO PROHIBIT SECOND
UNITS PURSUANT TO STATE CODE 65852.2. Memorandum from
Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November 3,
1992.
2
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
7. GUIDANCE ON CITY YARD RELOCATION SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY.
Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated
November 4, 1992.
8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
(a) City Council/Planning Commission workshop. Memorandum
from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November
3, 1992.
10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items:
(a)
(b)
(c)
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to
discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back
on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun-
cil action tonight.
Request by Councilmember Edgerton for consideration of
reconfiguration of VPD to Downtown Business District
Commission to implement R/UDAT proposals.
Request by Councilmember Edgerton for discussion re.
funding sources for development of South School Park and
Biltmore sites.
Request by Councilmember Edgerton for discussion of pro-
posal to reduce UUT taxes by 2% when County Prop A as-
sessment is levied.
Request by Councilmember Benz for consideration of send-
ing another letter to ABC regarding Besties'.^
Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of reduc-
tion of parking tickets to $10 in the commercial zones.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within
the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time.
Please limit comments to three minutes.
ADJOURNMENT
3Pt<ERD1 ii-�o-9z
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, November 10, 1992, at
the hour of 7:y9 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION - the closed session was held at 7: P.M. regard-
ing matters of potential litigation: pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(b). The closed session was recessed at 7: P.M.
to the regular scheduled public meeting.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -
ROLL CALL
Present: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Essertier
Absent: None
ANNOUNCEMENTS -
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any
items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time.
(Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard
during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one
minute. Citizens also may speak:
1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public
Hearings,
2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of
items appearing under Municipal Matters, and
3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen
Comments".
Coming forward to address the Council at this time were:
Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place,
Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street,
June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue,
Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd.,
6%)Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd.,
6)
-- g-- r06.<7,.c._(_:".„-e:/y z. a —76�
City Council Minutes 11-10-92 1 Page 1 P
• /-f
�-- -
Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, 0) ?v 1,2 `-P
497,0 t7./:; G
V:1)im Lissxfer - 2715 E1 Oeste Drive),
Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive,
Edie Webber - 1210 Eleventh Street,
Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place,
,fes9t-t-).--A-0--N-
>/
Pi
1.
Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street,
CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters
will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the
majority consent of the City Council. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless good cause is
shown by a member prior to the roll call vote.
* Councilmember requests to remove items from the
Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered
under Agenda Item 3.)
* Public comments on the Consent Calendar.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations
(a) through (e), noting that item 1( ) was continued to
the meeting of November 24, 1992, and that Councilmember
registered a "no" vote on item 1( ).
Motion mac( , second So ordered.
Coming forward to address the Council on items not removed from
the consent calendar were:
No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed
from the consent calendar.
(a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of
the City Council held on October 27, 1992.
City Council Minutes 11-10-92 Page 2
(b)
Action: To approve the minutes of the regular meeting
of October 27, 1992 as
Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants
Nos. 42363 through 42431 inclusive and Nos. 42433
through 42499 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos.
42365, 42366, 42391, 42433, 42434, and 42458.
Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as
presented.
(c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future
Agenda Items.
(d)
p(e)
Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda
items as presented.
Recommendation to receive and file the October, 1992
investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary
L. Brutsch dated November 4, 1992.
Action: To receive and file the October, 1992 invest-
ment report as presented.
Recommendation to award towing service and storage
garage bid for the Police Department to Frank Scotto
Towing. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve
Wisniewski dated October 28, 1992. Supplemental letter
from Robert Van Lingen of Van Lingen Towing, 20621 Earl
Street, Torrance, CA, dated November 6, 1992.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to award
the towing service and storage garage bid to Frank Scot-
to Towing of Torrance, California.
fbt,(:2-e:Ap:f1-5f../J-,,,0 , 1 Council Minutes 11-10-92 Page 3
411)
•
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
DISCUSSION.
Item (P,) 4itheard at this time
in order for clarity.
FOR SEPARATE
butte shown
* Public comments on items removed from the consent
calenda are shown under the appropriate items.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS.
(a) Letter from Chamber of Commerce dated October 31, 1992,
requesting bagging of the silver posted meters in VPD
district for month of December; also to close Pier
Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and Beach Drive from 5:00
to 7:30 p.m. December 2 for annual tree lighting ceremo-
ny. Recommended Action: To approve the Chamber's
requests. G yy T----`� \ — �-��
ifaato,
--a--,e / ---mac �.- '
v OAction: To approve the taff recommendation.
frt-/1 Motion Fid, second(. So ordered.
_� / /
mac. ,�`�' 7, � � � � W � /,��
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. //„Ijr6,^'%_'-I -1-
5. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION REGARDING RING HARBOR
HOTEL TO BE LOCATED AT 125 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memo-
randum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated
November 3, 1992, with Resolution for adoption.
G� C..)/Dl / 9' _1--) +(
Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report
and responded to Council questions.
atir_44C 4-v
The public hearingopene9 as s_39 P.M. Coming
dress the Council on this item were:
/ /1/1"--7(—'7 f-1-,"--,A.N- /L -c-,) ,----; Af2-e-0:---i--Ce,,vt_,D (_
j �it^-� )74 � _ , ,�'` --vim
4it_( d-- 67 .2-- _.---- ) Com---
,or- "?‘--)/ —,
/-(>1-di 7 Ai ----e/
fit,tit-ey:/e;/\-Le-# /t /
,(4.„( --r 2_,o) ~ s" ----c ty Council Minutes 11-10-92 Page 4
)u _
forward to ad-
r �o
0/-1;,
kO/
A cs\?
°)
qr
��
.141\
r4 CS\ II \\I \\
\\&)
kv‘
\\N-)/
-\1 -)r pro:
10,‘ 'k) a k. 1
k\ v ,i \ - % / /
''',
'''',\
k,.)-
k\D)y
CA
•
lam- ,,, 7/Y /777 L-42- 14-//4!--
90%
-/' --
The public hearing closed at 7:a) P.M.
dciv ve,y /-eiv
(Action: To approve the Planning Commission and staff
'� recommendation and adopt Resolution 4No7792=55;\ enti-
tled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
O'` -- 4HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT AND PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A SEVENTY (70)
UNIT HOTEL WITH RETAIL, A RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE AL-
COHOL AND A HOTEL PIANO BAR/COCKTAIL LOUNGE WITH ON -SALE
GENERAL ALCOHOL.
';
7
Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the
dissenting votes of
Action:
4-7
To C— , .QP
.4fr
PROPOSED ORDINANCE FOR TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING ES-
TABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR OR TO PROHIBIT SECOND
UNITS PURSUANT TO STATE CODE 65852.2. Memorandum from
Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November 3,
1992, with Ordinance for introduction.
Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report
and responded to Council questions.
The public hearing opened at /O :33P.M. Coming forward to ad-
dress the Council on this item were:
=Y
City Council Minutes 11-10-92
Page 5
•
The public hearing closed at / 0: -> P.M.
e / 2 e
)''"/
Action: To approve the Planning Commission and staff
recommendation and introduce Ordinance, -No _92_1087,
Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the
dissenting votes of
Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance no.
492E1.08 ;entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO
PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE CREATION OF SECOND UNITS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 65852,2 OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE
AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION."
Motion
AYES:
Noes:
, second
Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, and Mayor
Essertier
/P/tiZ&C
None
e— (ij,„_"..-4
figoet__t )/tz)
.
Action: To
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
7. GUIDANCE ON CITY YARD RELOCATION SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY.
Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated
November 4, 1992.
City Manager Ferrin presented the staff report and re-
sponded to Council questions. Mr. Ferrin listed pos-
sible sites as:
1) industrial yard space to the immediate south of the
Redondo -Hermosa border (in Redondo Beach);
2
the Body Glove building and property next to the
City Yard;
City Council Minutes 11-10-92 Page 6
•
3) South School (approximately one quarter of the
space would be used as a replacement site);
4) Community Center;
5) the Mini -Storage lot south of City Hall;
6) the Hospital District Property on P.C.H. between
16th and 21st Streets;
7) Hermosa View School; and,
8) North School.
Coming forward to address the Council on this item were:
;-2--:;7
7
7/6,
D
Action: To
City Council Minutes 11-10-92 Page 7
•
8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
j-^ oz 1 --
City
City Manager Ferrin
//7/
reported /1„4_,
9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
(a)
City Council/Planning Commission workshop. Memorandum
from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November
3, 1992.
AVA a-4/ .4
Action: To approve the date of Thursday, December 3,
1992, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. for a joint City Council/
Planning Commission workshop meeting with the agenda to
include:
1) Land Use Element update; and,
2) R/UDAT plan.
/°Y.
Motion , second . So ordered.
10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items:
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to
discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back
on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun-
cil action tonight.
(a)
Request by Councilmember Edgerton for consideration of
reconfiguration of VPD to Downtown Business District
Commission to implement R/UDAT proposals.
Councilmember Edgerton discussed his request.
City Council Minutes 11-10-92 Page 8
•
Action: To A‘r--
y W-2)
/41 /`?
&/-ir
ifr7r
(b) Request by Councilmembererton for discussion re.
funding sources for development of South School Park and
Biltmore sites.
Councilmember Edgerton discussed his request.)
1-- /7// /7
Action: To
/
Request by Councilmember Edgerton for discussion of pro-
posal to reduce UUT taxes by 2% when Count Pro ,as-
sessment is evied.
401--64-41/O/95slig5-411
Councilmember Edgerton discussed his request. I
Action: To
(d) Request by Councilmember Benz for consideration of send-
ing another letter to ABC regarding Besties.
Councilmember Benz discussed his request.
4/gOe )— (
�►ction: To
v -J 2-:2-c ` /
776 C /z2,02 .e,,er 9 7-7/
/7/1 re, City Council Minutes 11-10-92
te, — `-O
Page 9
'7&' 0 /0e('--1-' 47-- 41f IY"-- .---7 __.... - o--- ____?,,r
'''70---P z 7;( — /.. 4(__ )-_,,
#g (at) 2.‘&(,_e2 ) , e-( -2Ve;
/‘,/, ,_,), 2 ),, ,_ &'-'' / e( ' 4'- /1 .
g,,if--( 472-; 4 ( )7) ,--e -)),`")
.-r:::;4,.. ,=r
(5L- _
(c
'644- v-
//li•57---- ; /o
c5?
INF
/0 '(
Q `�^� Rhe o Request i' �' Y� '" 4 / PJ A 1—�"' Q C2�i
( ) q by Councilmember Benz for discussion of reduc-
tion of parking tickets to $10 in the commercial zones.
Councilmember Benz discussed his request.
Action: To
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Coming forward to address the Council at this time were:
ar,/,
eev�� � v City Council Minutes 11-10-92 Page 10
Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place,
Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street,
June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue,
Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd.,
hirley Cassell -
2___/; t' 9
Parker Herriott -
611 Monterey Blvd.
224 Twenty-fourth Street,
;) /2
4
/ 77-
<AA-
im Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive,
Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive,
Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place,
Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street,
g)7,7
��f
Wig (()
/ice 0
4- /' U 0 Go
C/ I 7( e-/-4
/,,6C1
--0•16-a" /ifej g
riAtf /d1-44,÷4") /) r
/d -fit
d /1)
•
ADJOURNMENT - The
of Hermosa Beach,
1992, at the hour
Tuesday, November
Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City
California, adjourned on Tu sday, November 10,
of %2 :.E.34P-:111. to a Regular Meeting to be held
24, 1992, at the hour of 7:30 P.M.
Deputy City Clerk
City Council Minutes 11-10-92 Page 11
ACTION SHEET ACTION SHEET
REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, November 10, 1992 - Council Chambers, City Hall
Closed Session - 7:00 p.m.
Regular Session - 7:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY EDGERTON
ROLL CALL: ALL PRESENT
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
ROBERT VAN LINGEN - REQUESTED le BE PULLED.
TOM MORLEY - RE ITEM ON RELOCATION ON CITY YARD. WOULD LIKE IT
DONE EARLIER ON AGENDA.
PARKER HERRIOTT - RE. BILTMORE SITE PARK SUCCEEDING. WANTS COUN-
CIL ASSURANCE THAT CITY WILL SEEK A GENERAL PLAN CHANGE FROM
COASTAL COMMISSION FOR THE SITE.
MARTY MARINO - SPOKE AGAINST PARK. BUT MENTIONED THAT THE BALLOT
MEASURE WAS AT LEAST SPELLED OUT CLEARLY THIS TIME.
MARK FREEMAN WANTS TO SPEAK ON 10A AND 10E
SHIRLEY CASSELL - SPOKE ABOUT COUNCIL NOT MEETING ON TIME.
KEVIN CODY - 823 HERMOSA AVE. - HAD SUBMITTED LETTERS RE. BES -
TIES. WHAT IF ANY ACTION COUNCIL TOOK AT SEPT. 24, 1991 MEETING
RE. BESTIES. WOULD AT LEAST LIKE A COPY OF LTR. STEVE SENT TO
ABC AND A COPY OF THE MEMO HE PROVIDED TO CLOSED SESSION.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
(a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of
the City Council held on October 27, 1992.
(b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants
Nos. through inclusive.
(c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future
Agenda Items.
(d) Recommendation to receive and file the October, 1992
investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary
L. Brutsch dated November 4, 1992.
(e) Recommendation to award towing service and storage
garage bid for the Police Department to Frank Scotto
1
Towing. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve
Wisniewski dated October 28, 1992.
PULLED BY RB -
ROBERT VAN LINGEN - SPOKE ON BEHALF OF HIS TOWING FIRM.
FRANK SCOTTO - SPOKE ON BEHALF OF HIS FIRM.
MOTION KM/AW - TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD CONTRACT
TO FRANK SCOTTO. OK 4-1 (RE -NO).
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES.
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
* Public comments on items removed from the Consent
Calendar.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS.
(a) Letter from Chamber of Commerce dated October 31, 1992,
requesting bagging of the silver posted meters in VPD
district for month of December; also to close Pier
Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and Beach Drive from 5:00
to 7:30 p.m. December 2 for annual tree lighting ceremo-
ny. Recommended Action: To approve the Chamber's
requests.
MOTION
YES)
RE/SE TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. FAILS 2-3 (RB/SE-
MOTION RE/KM TO UNBAG METERS
FORCEMENT OF THREE HOUR TIME
LAST WEEK OF DEC. AND CONTINUE EN -
LIMIT. OK 4-1 (SE -NO).
MOTION KM/AW TO CLOSE STREET
ORDERED.
FOR TREE LIGHTING CEREMONY. SO
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M.
5. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION REGARDING KING HARBOR
HOTEL TO BE LOCATED AT 125 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memo-
randum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated
November 3, 1992.
RUDY MUNOZ - SPOKE ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT.
STEVEN GANDY, 1ST ST. - AGAINST PROJECT. IMPOSSIBLE TRAFFIC
PROBLEM. ADDED CONGESTION OF TRAFFIC. WANTS IT PUT ON BALLOT.
CARLOS RODRIGUEZ - WILL INCREASE PARKING PROBLEMS. SPOKE OF THE
GTE PARKING LOT CURRENTLY BEING USED BY SOME RESIDENTS OF 1ST ST.
PARKER HERRIOTT - OPPOSED TO GRANTING OF PROJECT. HOW CAN PLAN-
NING COMMISSION INTERPRET THE LAW. AGAINST ANY LARGE HOTELS IN
H.B.
JERRY NEWTON - SPOKE IN FAVOR OF THE PROJECT.
MARK HOLLINSON(?) - PROJECT NOT COMPATIBLE WITH RESIDENTIAL AREA
IT ABUTS. THINKS INGRESS AND EGRESS DANGEROUS.
JOHN BOWLER - APPROVES OF PROJECT.
JOHN MCHUGH - 718 FIRST PLACE - OBJECTS TO HEIGHT. OBJECTS TO A
TRASH BIN DUCT VENTING THROUGH ROOF. NO DECELERATION LANE.
PROJECT NOT READY FOR FINAL APPROVAL.
GEORGIA JONES, 715 1ST ST. - HAVE BAD TRAFFIC CONGESTION. NO
PRIVACY. SHOULD HAVE TO BUILD AN 18 FT. WALL BETWEEN HER PROPER-
TY AND HOTEL. HOW LONG WILL PROJECT TAKE TO BUILD? ALSO OPPOSED
TO CLOSING 1ST ST. AND 1ST PLACE.
GARY WAYLAND - C OF C. - NEED TO SHOW SUPPORT FOR BUSINESS
COMMUNITY.
JACK ANDREN, 521 GENTRY - SPEAKING IN FAVOR OF HOTEL. THINKS
THERE SHOULD BE A COMPROMISE - ALLOW AN 18 FT. WALL, FOR
INSTANCE.
(?) - 65 PIER AVE. - SPOKE IN FAVOR OF HOTEL.
SHIRLEY CASSELL - IN FAVOR OF HOTEL. BUT DON'T LET HIM GO TO 38'
WHEN YOU HAVE LOWERED R-3 HEIGHT. ALSO SPOKE ABOUT MEETING HELD
ON CITY PROPERTY LAST NIGHT. WANTS TO BE SURE THEY PAID THE RENT
FOR USE OF THE ROOM.
JAN MCHUGH - 718 1ST PLACE - SUBMITTED A COPY OF A SPECIFIC PLAN
ORDINANCE FROM 1990. QUESTIONED THE APPROPRIATENESS OF MEETING
HELD LAST NIGHT.
MIKE MEYERS - 1ST ST. - IN FAVOR OF PROJECT.
CHUCK SHELDON, 1800 STRAND - SPOKE IN FAVOR
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED.
AW WOULD LIKE A WHEREAS ADDED THAT COUNCIL REALIZES THIS PROJECT
IS HIGHER THAN THE PUBLIC VOTE.
MOTION RB/SE - FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND ADOPT RESOLUTION AP-
PROVING PROJECT. OK 3-2 (KM/AW-NO).
6. PROPOSED ORDINANCE FOR TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING ES-
TABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR OR TO PROHIBIT SECOND
UNITS PURSUANT TO STATE CODE 65852.2. Memorandum from
Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November 3,
1992.
SHIRLEY CASSELL - POINTED OUT ANOTHER STATE LAW THAT WOULD ALLOW
SCRAPING A LOT AND PUTTING A MOBILE HOME ON IT.
JERRY COMPTON - SAYS THIS STATE LAW IS VERY UPSETTING
3
MOTION KM/ADOPT AN ALTERNATIVE ORDINANCE WHICH FOLLOWS SECTION C
UNDER THE CODE WHICH TOTALLY PRECLUDES THE SECOND UNITS AND IN-
STRUCT STAFF TO IMMEDIATELY BEGIN THE PROPER FINDINGS TO DO THAT.
SECOND SE.
MOTION KM/SE TO SEND ITEM BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION WITH DIREC-
TION THAT COUNCIL WISHES TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE WHICH IS CONSIS-
TENT WITH SUBDIVISION "C" OF SECTION 65852.2 OF STATE CODE WITH
PROPER FINDINGS. SO ORDERED 4-1 (AW -NO) AND TO CONTINUE TO DATE
CERTAIN OF DEC. 15 AT COUNCIL LEVEL.
SUGGESTED FINDINGS COULD INCLUDE DENSITY, QUALITY OF LIFE,
SEWERS, TRAFFIC, CONDITION OF STREETS, SUMMER INFLUX OF TOURISTS,
PARKING.
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
7. GUIDANCE ON CITY YARD RELOCATION SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY.
Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated
November 4, 1992.
TOM MORLEY, LOMA DRIVE - CHALLENGED USE OF ENTIRE YARD FOR OIL
DRILLING. SUBMITTED TO COUNCIL EXCERPTS FROM E.I.R. DONE ON OIL
DRILLING. ALSO SUBMITTED AN EXCERPT FROM STATE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
THAT STATES IF PROJECT SUBSTANTIALLY CHANGES, A NEW E.I.R. NEEDS
TO BE DONE.
MOTION RE/RB FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION BUT NOT INCLUDE SOUTH
SCHOOL SITE. OK 4-1 (KM -NO).
8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
C.M. SAID HE WOULD BRING BACK TRIMMING FOLIAGE ON GREENBELT AT A
LATER DATE.
9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
(a)
City Council/Planning Commission workshop. Memorandum
from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November
3, 1992.
SET FOR THE 8TH OR 9TH, WHICHEVER IS BETTER FOR P.C.
10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items:
Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to
discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back
on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun-
cil action tonight.
(a)
Request by Councilmember Edgerton for consideration of
reconfiguration of VPD to Downtown Business District
Commission to implement R/UDAT proposals.
PROPOSE COUNCIL MEET WITH VPD COMMISSIONERS LATER IN DECEMBER OR
JANUARY.
MOTION SE/RE TO TELL VPD WE WISH TO MEET IN JANUARY AND ASK THM
TO PICK SOME AVAILABLE DATES TO SEND BACK TO COUNCIL.
(b)
Request by Councilmember Edgerton for discussion re.
funding sources for development of South School Park and
Biltmore sites.
ASKED FOR REPORT FROM C.M. RE. USE OF PROP A FUNDS FOR OPEN SPACE
DEVELOPMENT.
RE ASKED IF ANY FUNDS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED AS STATED IN ARGUMENTS
FOR THE PARK.
PARKER HERRIOTT WANTS TO FIND OUT FROM CITY ATTORNEY ABOUT APPLY-
ING FOR NONPROFIT STATUS.
HERRIOTT ASKED WHEN CAN CITY GO TO COASTAL COMMISSION.
(c)
Request by Councilmember Edgerton for discussion of pro-
posal to reduce UUT taxes by 2% when County Prop A as-
sessment is levied.
SE REQUESTED CONTINUANCE OF THIS ITEM.
(d) Request by Councilmember Benz for consideration of send-
ing another letter to ABC regarding Besties'.
MOTION RB TO SEND ANOTHER LETTER TO ABC INDICATING CITY AWARE OF
SOME PRIOR COUNCIL CONTACT. SECOND SE.
WE KNOW OF CONTACT BY PREVIOUS CONTACT. GIVEN THAT CONTACT WE
WANT THEM TO IGNORE THAT CONTACT AND THAT THE MERITS OF CASE BE
BASED SOLELY ON THE FACTS PRESENTED TO ABC. RB/SE. FAILS 2-3
(KM/AW/RE)
(e) Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of reduc-
tion of parking tickets to $10 in the commercial zones.
RB SAID TO CONTINUE
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within
the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time.
Please limit comments to three minutes.
SHIRLEY CASSELL - COMPLAINED ABOUT CONDITION OF COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
CAROL HUNT - NOTED THERE WILL BE A R/UDAT MEETING THURSDAY.
MARK FREEMAN - CONSIDER STARTING MEETINGS EARLIER.
JIM LISSNER - CORRECT HUM IN VIDEO .
ADJOURNMENT AT 12:30 A.M.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, October 27, 1992, at
the hour of 7:58 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION - the closed session was held at 7:10 P.M. regard-
ing matters of meet and confer; and matters of potential litiga-
tion: pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b). The closed
session was recessed at 7:40 P.M. to the regular scheduled public
meeting.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - William Grove, Building and Safety
Director
ROLL CALL
Present: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Essertier
Absent: None
PROCLAMATION: "Buckle Up for Life" Challenge, 1992-1993
Mayor Essertier proclaimed the holiday months of 1992 and all of
1993 as Buckle Up For Life and urged all citizens to buckle up
their seat belts and child safety seats each and every time they
travel in a motor vehicle.
PRESENTATION OF OUTSTANDING EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER AWARD:
Michael Flaherty, Public Works Crewleader
Mayor Essertier introduced Personnel Director Robert Blackwood,
who -presented the July, August, and September 1992 "Employee of
the Quarter" award plaque to Michael Flaherty, Leadperson in the
Parks and Medians Division of the Public Works Department, for
his consistently outstanding level of performance in his regular
duties, and for his many hours of volunteer time in planting the
Greenbelt and working with the Parks, Recreation and Community
Resources Advisory Commission designing and maintaining parks in
the City. Mr. Flaherty is well respected by his fellow employees
for his friendly attitude and his knowledge of City affairs.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Coming forward to address the Council at this time were:
Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., suggested the
meeting time be changed to 8:00 P.M. or closed
session time be scheduled earlier, in order to
have meetings start on time;
Martin Moreno - 1326 Corona Street, spoke in
opposition to the recall effort and special
election costs;
Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., #300, thanked
everyone involved in R/UDAT; said the report
was available at the Chamber of Commerce of-
fice; said the real issue stated by R/UDAT was
a downtown core developed along Pier Avenue;
and,
Robert Evans - Fleet Feet Triathlete, thanked the
City Council Minutes 10-27-92 Page 7964
City for its cooperation in the recent
triathlon.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations
(a) through (i), with the exception of the following
items which were removed for discussion in item 3 but
are listed in order for clarity: (e) City Manager, and
(g) Midstokke.
Motion Edgerton, second Wiemans. So ordered.
No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed
from the consent calendar.
(a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of
the City Council held on October 13, 1992.
(b)
Action: To approve the minutes of October 13, 1992 as
presented.
Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants
Nos. 43087, 42231, 42232, and 42233 through 42362 inclu-
sive, noting voided warrants Nos. 42233, 42234, 42235,
42246, 42255, 42293, 42294, and 42318.
Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as
presented.
(c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future
Agenda Items.
Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda
items as presented.
(d)
(e)
Recommendation to receive and file the September, 1992
financial reports:
1) Revenue and expenditure report;
2) City Treasurer's report.
Action: To receive and file the September, 1992 finan-
cial reports as presented.
Recommendation to adopt resolution of intent to study
decreasing open space requirements on small lots in all
residential zones. Memorandum from Planning Director
Michael Schubach dated October 20, 1992 with supplemen-
tal memorandum from Planning Commission dated October
21, 1992.
This item was removed from the consent calendar by the
City Manager at the request of staff for separate dis-
cussion later in the meeting.
City Council Minutes 10-27-92 Page 7965
Planning Director Schubach asked for direction from the
Council and asked if the Council wished to reconsider an
Ordinance received and filed by the Council earlier.
City Attorney Vose responded to Council questions.
Proposed Action: To reconsider the previous Ordinance.
Motion Mayor Essertier. The motion died due to the lack
of a second.
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-5582, entitled, "A
RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO STUDY REDUCING THE AMOUNT
OF OPEN SPACE REQUIRED FOR SMALL LOTS IN RESIDENTIAL
ZONES."
Motion Benz, second Edgerton. So ordered, noting the
objection of Midstokke.
Recommendation to adopt resolution establishing the re-
fuse rates for shared refuse facility users. Memorandum
from Building Director William Grove dated October 19,
1992.
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-5580, entitled, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING EXHIBIT "A" OF RESOLUTION
NO. 92-5556 TO PROVIDE REFUSE RATES FOR THE USERS OF
SHARED REFUSE FACILITIES LOCATED IN PARKING LOTS A, B,
AND C.", to show no increase for this category.
Recommendation to approve request to authorize Civil
Service Board to hold public hearings regarding revi-
sions to the Personnel Rules and Regulations. Memoran-
dum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated Oc-
tober 20, 1992.
This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun-
cilmember Midstokke for separate discussion later in the
meeting.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to au-
thorize the Civil Service Board to hold public hearings
regarding revisions to the Personnel Rules and Regula-
tions, which were last amended in 1971, in order to more
accurately reflect the current employment Memoranda of
Understanding (MOU). And to direct the Civil Service
Board to include the following topics, submitted by the
Council's Civil Service sub -committee composed of Mid-
stokke and Benz, in its hearings:
1) oral versus written testing and the percentage of
each in the examinations;
2) physical examinations to determine a prospective
employee's ability to assume a job requiring a de-
gree of physical ability; and
City Council Minutes 10-27-92 Page 7966
(h)
(i)
3) minimum performance expectation standards.
Motion Midstokke, second Benz. So ordered.
Recommendation to amend Resolution No. 90-5422 by adding
thereto a new user fee for vehicle inspections for non-
residents. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve
Wisniewski dated October 19, 1992. With Resolution for
adoption.
Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-5581, entitled, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 90-5422 BY ES-
TABLISHING A NEW FEE TO RECOVER THE COST OF PROVIDING
SERVICES.", setting a five dollar ($5.00) fee for vehi-
cle inspections (ticket sign -offs) performed for non-
residents of the City of Hermosa Beach.
Recommendation to approve request for transportation
services for the annual "Mama Liz" free Thanksgiving
dinner. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Fer-
rin dated October 21, 1992. Supplemental memorandum
from City Manager's office dated October 27, 1992.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to ap-
propriate an amount not to exceed $150 (with the cost
approximated at $72 based on an average six (6) hours of
use at $12 per hour) for transportation services for the
Easy Reader "Mama Liz" free Thanksgiving Dinner from
prospective expenditures.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 92-1077 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER-
MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
TEXT TO ELIMINATE SECTION 7.2-27 REGARDING CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS AND ADOPTION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption.
Action: To adopt Ordinance NO. 92-1077.
Motion Mayor Essertier, second Benz. So ordered.
(b) ORDINANCE NO. 92-1078 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER-
MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 30, ARTICLE
III, TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX, SECTION 30-12, DEFINI-
TIONS. For adoption.
Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 92-1078.
Motion Benz, second Mayor Essertier. So ordered, noting
the objection of Wiemans.
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
Items 1 (e) and (g) were heard at this time, but are
shown in order for clarity.
City Council Minutes 10-27-92 Page 7967
* Public comments on items removed from the consent
calendar are shown under the appropriate item.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS.
(a) Letter from Matthew D. Cruse dated October 12, 1992,
regarding police officers removing illegal placards and
signs from light and telephone standards, with response
from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated Oc-
tober 19, 1992. Recommended action: To receive and
file.
Public Safety Director Wisniewski responded to Council
questions.
Proposed Action: To direct staff to determine if there
is someone else available to perform this function
rather than uniformed Police Officers.
Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion failed due to
the dissenting votes of Midstokke, Wiemans and Mayor
Essertier.
Action: To receive and file.
Motion Mayor Essertier, second Benz. So ordered.
(b) Letter from C. M. Yates, 911 17th Street, dated October
19, 1992 regarding the red zone area at 850 17th Street,
with response from Public Works Director Charles
McDonald dated October 21, 1992.
(c)
City Manager Ferrin presented an oral report on the
problem and gave the staff recommendation: to leave a
gray zone in front of the property at 850 17th Street,
but to paint the curve red again.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation presented
by the City Manager.
Motion Mayor Essertier, second Edgerton. So ordered.
Letter from Robert. McAlinden, owner of Besties, dated
September 16, 1992 requesting Council to authorize City
Manager to send a letter to the Alcohol Beverage Control
Board.
Mayor Essertier read, for Council discussion, a proposed
letter to the Alcohol Beverage Control which stated that
the present Council wished only to have the case decided
on the facts and testimony presented, and to have jus-
tice dispensed in the customary and appropriate manner.
Coming forward to address the Council on this item were:
Robert McAlinden - owner of Besties, stated that a
previous Council (or Councilmember) had inter-
vened to request that "an example be made" of
him and his restaurant; requested this Council
City Council Minutes 10-27-92 Page 7968
correct that intervention; and,
Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., spoke in
agreement with sending the letter.
Action: Mayor Essertier directed, with the concurrence
of Benz and Edgerton, that the letter that had been read
aloud be sent to the Alcohol Beverage Control, noting
the objections by Midstokke and Wiemans.
By motion of Mayor Essertier and seconded by Edgerton, the meet-
ing recessed at 9:01 P.M.
The meeting reconvened at 9:18 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - None
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
5. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH NEGOTIATIONS
WITH VASEK POLAK REGARDING LAND EXCHANGE/SALE FOR PROP-
ERTY WHICH IS PART OF OR ADJACENT TO PARKING LOT "E".
Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William
Grove dated October 19, 1992.
Building and Safety Director Grove presented the staff
report and responded to Council questions. City Manager
Ferrin also responded to Council questions.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) obtain appraisals of property owned by the City of
Hermosa Beach and Vasek Polak which would be in-
volved in an exchange of sale; funds for the ap-
praisals would need to be made available from pro-
spective expenditures (approximately $2,000);
2) obtain a commitment from the owners of Lots 58, 61,
62 and 63 that they will cooperate with an easement
or dedication of the rear ten 10) feet of their
lots for a public alley without directcompensa-
tion; and,
3) negotiate with Vasek Polak for the exchange, sale
or lease of property described as (attached exhibit
to report):
a) exchange of the easterly 35 feet of Lot 89
(owned by Vasek Polak) for Lot 88 and ten feet
of Lot 87 (owned by the City); the portion
owned by the City is currently leased to Vasek
Polak; and,
b) sale of Lot 65 and the westerly 5 feet of Lot
64 (owned by the City) to Vasek Polak.
Also contained in the exhibit were the following
items:
c) a dedication or easement over the westerly 10
feet of Lots 58, 61, 62 and 63 to provide a
public alley parallel to Pacific Coast Highway
and connecting 2nd Street and 3rd Street; and,
City Council Minutes 10-27-92 Page 7969
d) a lot line adjustment would be necessary to
realign parcels (portions of Lots 89 and 64);
no additional parcels would be created.
And, it was understood that City Manager Ferrin would be
in charge of the negotiations and that City Attorney
Vose would investigate the dedication of Lots 64 and 89
and determine if public parking in perpetuity could be
mandated.
Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion carried,
noting the dissenting votes of Midstokke and Wiemans.
6. PROPOSED REVISED STREET SWEEPING SCHEDULE - REDUCTION OF
FOUR HOUR "NO PARKING" ZONES TO TWO HOUR ZONES. Memo-
randum from Public Works Director dated October 14,
1992. Supplemental letter from Howard Longacre, 1221
Seventh Place, dated October 27, 1992.
Public Works Director McDonald presented the staff re-
port and responded to Council questions. City Manager
Ferrin also responded to Council questions.
Action: To direct staff to return to the Council with
information on:
1) dividing the City into sections for implementation
purposes rather than undertaking the change
citywide;
2) change the start of the sweeping schedule to some-
time later than 8:00 A.M.; and,
3) more precise cost estimates by field evaluation of
the amount of supplies needed, with the understand-
ing that it go to bid.
Motion Midstokke, second Edgerton. The motion carried,
noting the dissenting votes of Benz and Mayor Essertier.
7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
City Manager Ferrin reported that the County had recon-
sidered its decision to close the Hermosa Beach Library
on Fridays, therefore an agenda packet would continue to
be placed there for public review.
Mr. Ferrin also suggested that the date for the one City
Council meeting in December could be set for the third
Tuesday of the month as the Planning Commission was not
meeting that night.
Mayor Essertier directed, with the consensus of the
Council, that the date of Tuesday, December 15, 1992, at
the hour of 7:30 P.M., be set for the only regular meet-
ing of the City Council in December.
Coming forward to address the Council was:
Joseph DiMonda - 610 Ninth Street, asked if a date
could be set for a joint City Council/Planning
Commission workshop meeting in December (the
City Council Minutes 10-27-92 Page 7970
response was that staff usually negotiated the
date between the two bodies.)
8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
Councilmember Midstokke spoke regarding the signage and
resurfacing of alternate parking spaces in order to pro-
hibit parking on the Greenbelt and suggested that the
Clark Field lot not be slurry sealed, but restriped
only, this year in order to determine if there was a
potential safety problem with cars backing out of the
new areas.
City Manager Ferrin responded that he would bring the
bid package to Council at the November 10, 1992 meeting
for the other lots and curb cutting.
9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items:
(a) Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of placing
trash bins beside the bus benches.
Councilmember Benz discussed his request.
(b)
Proposed Action: To direct staff to place drums beside
bus benches.
Motion Benz, second Edgerton. This motion was changed
(as follows) to reflect suggested action by Midstokke.
Action: To refer this item to staff in order to inves-
tigate and return to Council with a recommendation of
the best method to accomplish this, including cost and
type of containers.
Motion Benz, second Edgerton. So ordered.
Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of having
complaints become public information with the exception
of those required by law not to become public
information.
Councilmember Benz discussed his request.
Proposed Action: To direct that in cases where a com-
plaint to the City is not proven to be a violation of
the law, that the name of the complainant be public
record.
Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion failed due to
the dissenting votes of Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans and
Mayor Essertier. There was no further action taken.
City Council Minutes 10-27-92 Page 7971
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Coming forward to address the Council at this time were:
Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., suggested
that rather than start the street sweeping
later in the day, they might want to start even
earlier as it was now light earlier; and sug-
gested that the Council stop trying to "micro -
manage" everything and let the City Manager do
his job of managing the City.
ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City
of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday, October 27,
1992, at the hour of 10:13 P.M. to a closed session regarding
potential litigation: pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(b).
The closed session began at 10:15 P.M. and adjourned at the hour
of 11:00 P.M. to a Regular Meeting to be held Tuesday, November
10, 1992, at the hour of 7:30 P.M.
Deputy City Clerk
City Council Minutes 10-27-92 Page 7972
1NANCE-SFA340
TIME 16:34:33
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
H HEATING AND COOLING
AIR CONDITTONER/DTBPATCH
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 10/29/92
VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
04916 001-400-2101-5499 00001
1072679— ---. POLICE ....
/Jit -9
PAGE
DATE
0001 y
10/29/92
INV/REF PO N CHK N
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
11739. 80
/NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS
wss VENDOR TOTAL wwssssw******swsssswwwwswwwwwww*wswwswwsswswwssssswwww
H BONNIEwPIERCE
MEALS/HOTEL/STC TRAINING
www VENDOR TOTAL
www PAY CODE TOTAL
R A & E TROPHIES
MISC CHARGES/OCT 92
R A & E TROPHIES
MISC CHARGES/OCT 92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
04898 001-400-2101-4313 00418
10/26/92 POLICE
*739.80
11917. 25
/TRAVEL EXPENSE, BTC
11917.25
$1,657.05
02744 001-400-1101-4319 00138 121.61
10/29/92 CITY COUNCIL /SPECIAL EVENTS
02744 001-400-4601-4308 00761 1116.48
10/29/92 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS
R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS
MISC CHARGES/OCT 92
•++ VENDOR TOTAL
R
R
R
R
R
$138.09
00857 001-400-2101-4306 01273 *16.25
7147 10/27/92 POLICE
/PRISONER MAINTENANCE
BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY, INC.
INSP GARAGE DOOR/CTY YRD 10568
RARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY, INC.
INSP GARAGE DOOR/CTY YRD 10568
BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY, INC.
INSP GARAGE DOOR/CTY YRD 10568
BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY, INC.
INSP GARAGE DOOR/CTY YRD 10568
BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY, INC.
INSP GARAGE DOOR/CTY YRD 10568
01889 001-400-3101-4201 00121
09/30/92 MEDIANS
01889 001-400-3103-4201 00427
09/30/92 ST MAINTENANCE
01889 001-400-3104-4201 00136
09/30/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY
01889 001-400-6101-4201 00295
09/30/92 PARKS
$16.25
05093 42364
*0.00 10/29/92
04590 42363
110.00 10/29/92
00102 42367
*0.00 10/29/92
00102 42367
*0.00 10/29/92
7147 00105 42368
$0.00 10/29/92
$41 00 10568 05279 42369
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 10/29/92
*41.00 10568 05279 42367
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 10/29/92
*41.00 10568 05279 42369
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 10/29/92
*41.00 10568 05279 42369
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 10/29/92
01889 105-400-2601-4201 00069 *41.00 10568 05279
42369
09/30/92 STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 10/29/92
lb
•
p
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 16 34 33
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R BARR DOOR OF SOUTH BAY, INC.
INSP GARAGE DOOR/CTY YRD 10568
•** VENDOR TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 10/29/92
PAGE 0002
DATE 10/29/92
VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO N CHK M
DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
01889 160-400-3102-4201 00045 1203.00 10568 05279 42369
09/30/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 10.00 10/29/92
R BLACKTOP MATERIALS CO.
04352 ' 109-400-8701-4309 00001
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92 34559 10/29/92 CIP 89-701
*** VENDOR TOTAL
$408.00
$75.78 34510/34559 00109 42370
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 10/29/92
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER
PETTY CASH/THRU 10-27
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER
PETTY CASH/THRU 10-27
R
R
R
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER
PETTY CASH/THRU 10-27
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER
PETTY CASH/THRU 10-27
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER
PETTY CASH/THRU 10-27
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER
PETTY CASH/THRU 10-27
R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER
GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER
PETTY CASH/THRU 10-27
GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER
PETTY CASH/THRU 10-27
GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER
PETTY CASH/THRU 10-27
PETTY CASH/THRU 10-27
PETTY CASH/THRV 10-27
02016 001-300-0000-3904
10/29/92
*75. 78
00461 $20.00
/GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS
02016 001-400-1205-4305 00133
10/29/92 CABLE TV
02016 001-400-2101-4305
10/29/92 POLICE
$38.95
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
01870 *16.50
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
02016 001-400-2101-4316 00952 *15.00
10/29/92 POLICE
02016 001-400-3101-4309 00160
10/29/92 MEDIANS
/TRAINING
*16. 24
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
02016 001-400-4202-4305 00739 $28.45
10/29/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
02016 001-400-4204-4309 02488 $40.09
10/29/92 BLDO MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
02016 001-400-4601-4305 01095 *5.38
10/29/92 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
02016 001-400-4601-`4308 00762 $111.46
10/29/92 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS
02016 110-400-3302-4187 00374 $9.50
10/29/92 PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
02016 170-400-2103-4316 00048 *52.00
10/29/92 SPEC INVESTOTNS /TRAINING
03874 42371
*0. 00 10/29/92
03874 42371
*0.00 10/29/92
03874 42371
*0.00 10/29/92
03874 42371
*0.00 10/29/92
03874 42371
*0. 00 10/29/92
03874 42371
*0.00 10/29/92
03874 42371
*0.00 10/29/92
03874 42371
$0.00 10/29/92
03874 42371
$0.00 10/29/92
03874 42371
*0. 00 10/29/92
03874 42371
$0.00 10/29/92
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0003
TIME 16:34:33 FOR 10/29/92 DATE 10/29/92
PAY VENDOR NAME VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK 0
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL $373.57
R CALIF DLDO CODES INSTITUTE 02357 001-400-4201-4305 00805 $35.00 04236 42372
PUBLICATIONS/BUILDING 09/04/92 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *35 00 10/29/92
rrr VENDOR TOTAL
$35. 00
R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-3101-4303 00240 *663.47 01011 42373
WATER BILLS/OCT 92 10/29/92 MEDIANS /UTILITIES $0.00 10/29/92
R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-4204-4303 00617 *540.65 01011 42373
WATER BILLS/OCT 92 10/29/92 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES $0.00 10/29/92
R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-6101-4303 00476 $2,567. 10 01011 42373
WATER BILLS/OCT 92 10/29/92 PARKS /UTILITIES *0.00 10/29/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
$3,771.22
R CENTINELA SO DAY VISA 03353 001-400-2101-4316 00951 *88. 58 05095 42374
OCT 92 EXP/WISNIEWSKI 10/13/92 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 10/29/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
$88.08
R CHARLIE CHAN, INC. 03634 001-400-4601-4302 00197 $2,995.00 22943 04968 42375
PRINT FALL REC BROCHURES 22943 09/08/92 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING *2,995.00 10/29/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
$2,995.00
R CHEVRON USA, INC. 00634 170-400-2103-4310 00077 *641.02 1417284419 01015 42376
WESTNET GASOLINE/OCT 92 84419 10/21/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES $0.00 10/29/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
$641.02
R CONNECTING POINT LEASING 03617 001-400-2101-4201 01143 $497.92 00051 42377
COMPUTER RENTAL/OCT 92 10/08/92 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 10/29/92
R CONNECTING POINT LEASING '.03617 001-400-2201-4201 00340 $162.11 00051 42377
COMPUTER RENTAL/OCT 92 10/08/92 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 10/29/92
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 16:34:33
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R CONNECTING POINT LEASING
COMPUTER RENTAL/OCT 92
R CONNECTING POINT LEASING
COMPUTER RENTAL/OCT 92
•** VENDOR TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 10/29/92
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
03617
10/08/92
03617
10/08/92
001-400-2701-4201 00079
$335.80
PAGE 0004
DATE 10/29/92
1NV/REF PO N CHK N
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
CIVIL DEFENSE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
170-400-2103-4201 00128 *162.11
SPEC INVESTOTN8 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
R CORRECT PLUMBING
WORK GUARANTEE REFUND
*** VENDOR TOTAL
04927 001-210-0000-2110
32833 10/22/92
*1, 177. 94
00071 42377
$0.00 10/29/92
00071 42377
*0. 00 10/29/92
07126 *300.00 32877 07437 4237E
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 10/29/92
DANIEL FREEMAN LAX MED. CLINIC
EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS/SEP92 71-00
R DANIEL FREEMAN LAX MED. CLINIC
TB TESTING/ECKERT 91-30
02390 001-400-1203-4320 00431
10/01/92 PERSONNEL
*300. 00
$716.00 004971-00 07707
/PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS
02390 705-4.00-121.7-4182 00271 *122.08 1291-30
10/08/92 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR
*•• VENDOR TOTAL*****************N********N***•**N********•**N****************N***•*
R DATA SAFE
TAPE BTON7-0=12 TO 11-11 6476D
*** VENDOR TOTAL
*638.05
*0. 00
42379
10/29/92
07708 42377
$0.00 10/29/72
00156 001-400-1206-4201 01058 *171.70 64767 00010 42380
-107213 iff DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/rR1VAT *0.00 10/27%72
R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HIGHWAY MAINT/AUOU9T 92 23266
R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HIGHWAY MAINT/AUGUST 92 23266
•** VENDOR TOTAL
*171.50
00267 001-400-3104-4251 00110 *394.06
09/22/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
00267 105-400-2601-4251 00174 *394.06
09/22/92 STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
R CHERIE*DOYLE
FALL CLASS REFUND 47592
•** VENDOR TOTAL
$788. 12
123266 05276
*0, 00
123266 05276
$0. 00
04919 001-300-0000-3893 00678 $37.00 47592 05714
.10/21/92 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00
R ROSE MARIE*DUPRE
04920 001-300-0000-3893
FALL CLASS REFUND 48006 10/21/92
*37. 00
00677 3137 00 46006 07713
/CONTR RECREATION CLASSES
$0.00
42381
10/29/92
42381
10/29/92
42382
10/29/92
42363
10/29/92
I
.I
I." r
•
•
•
41
' FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 16 34 33
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0005
FOR 10/29/92 DATE 10/29/92
PAY VENDOR NAME VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT 1NV/REF PO N C111( N
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL
$135. 00
R MARCY*DVTTON 04807 001-300-0000-3893 00681 $15.00 42061 05722 42384
FALL CLASS REFUND 42061 10/20/92 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 10/29/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
$15.00
R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 02840 001-400-1208-4201 00929 $298.00 0061119041 00925 42385
COPIER MAINT/SEP 92 19041 10/04/92 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 10/29/92
R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 02840 001-400-1208-4201 00930 $23. 15 006M19041 00925 42385
COPIER METER USE/AUG 92 19041 10/04/92 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 10/29/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
$321.15
R EASTMAN. INC. 02514 001-400-1208-4305 01142 $335.11 01024 42386
OFFICE St/PP/STOCK/OCT 92 10/29/92 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 10/29/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
R LYDIA*ECHEVARRIA 04924 001-210-0000-2110 05129
ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 47378 10/22/92
$335.11
$50.00 47378 05440 42387
/DEPOSITS/WORK'GUARANTEE *0.00 10/29/92
R LYDIA*ECHEVARRIA 04924 001-300-0000-3895 00044 *9.70CR
ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES 47378 10/22/92 /ANIMAL TRAP FEE
*** VENDOR TOTAL
*40. 30
47378 05440 42387
*0.00 10/29/92
R ROBERT*ESSERTIER 03221 001-210-0000-2110 05125 $400.00 82578 05436 42388
WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 82578 10/22/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00 10/29/72
*** VENDOR TOTAL
*400. 00
R VIRGINIA*FELIX 04136 001-300-0000-3893 00674 *40.00 47857/Y310 05710 42389
FALL CLASS REFUND /Y310 10/21/92 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 10/29/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
*40. 00
R STEVE*FILLMAN 03169 001-400-4601-4221 00077 *463.40 05715 42390
V -BALL TOURNEY DIRECTOR 10/21/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PROR *0.00 10/29/92
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 16:34:33
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
* * VENDOR TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 10/29/92
VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHCS/OCT 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHOB/OCT 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHOS/OCT 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHOS/OCT 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHCS/OCT 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CROS/OCT 92
R
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHOS/OCT 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHOB/OCT 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHOS/OCT 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHCS/OCT 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHCS/OCT 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHOS/OCT 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHGS/OCT 92
• ,TE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHGS/OCT 92
00015
10/29/92
00015
10/29/92
00015
10/29/92
00015
10/29/92
00015
10/29/92
001-400-1101-4304 00511
CITY COUNCIL
001-400-1121-4304 00571
CITY CLERK
001-400-1131-4304 00411
CITY ATTORNEY
001-400-1141-4304 00587
CITY TREASURER
001-400-1201-4304 00635
CITY MANAGER
00015 001-400-1202-4304 00642
10/29/92 FINANCE ADMIN
00015 001-400-1203-4304 00652
10/29/92 PERSONNEL
00015
10/29/92
00015
10/29/92
00015
10/29/92
001-400-1206-4304 00564
DATA PROCESSING
001-400-1207-4304 00445
BUS LICENSE
001-400-1208-4304 00254
GEN APPROP
00015 001-400-2101-4304
10/29/92 POLICE
01129
00015 001-400-2201-4304 00495
10/29/92 FIRE
00015
10/29/92
00015
10/29/92
001-400-2401-4304 00500
ANIMAL CONTROL
001-400-4101-4304 00645
PLANNING
0
PAGE 0006 �.
DATE 10/29/92
INV/REF PO 0 CHK N
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$463.40
$6.79
/TELEPHONE
$19.83
/TELEPHONE
$8. 46
/TELEPHONE
$16.65
/TELEPHONE
*14.40
/TELEPHONE
*05.12
/TELEPHONE
*39. 93
/TELEPHONE
$147.93
/TELEPHONE
*17.81
/TELEPHONE
*8.75
/TELEPHONE
$986.37
/TELEPHONE
$78.82
/TELEPHONE
$14.14
/TELEPHONE
360. 80
/TELEPHONE
01030 42392
$0.00 10/29/92
01030 42392
$0.00 10/29/92
01030 42392
$0.00 10/29/92
01030 42392
$0.00 10/29/92
01030 42392
$0.00 10/29/92
01030 42392
*0.00 10/29%92
01030 42392
$0.00 10/29/92
01030 42392
00.00 10/29/92
01030 42392
O 0.00 10/29/92
01030 42392
O 0.00 10/29/92
01030 42392
$0.00 10/29/92
01030 42392
$0.00 10/29/92
01030 42392
$0.00 10/29/92
01030 42392
$0.00 10/29/92
0
0
0
•
0
•
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 16:34:33
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHCS/OCT 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHGS/OCT 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHGS/OCT 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHCS/OCT 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHOS/OCT 92
R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHCS/OCT 92
R ' GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
MONTHLY TELE CHOS/OCT 92
••* VENDOR TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 10/29/92
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT
DATE 1NVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00015 001-400-4201-4304 00577
10/29/92 BUILDING
00015
10/29/92
00015
10/29/92
001-400-4202--4304 00698
PUB WKS ADMIN
001-400-4601-4304 00751
COMM RESOURCES
00013 001-400-6101-4304 00460
10/29/92 PARKS
00015
10/29/92
00015
10/29/92
00015
10/29/92
109-400-3301-4304 00060
VEH PRO DIST
110-400-3302-4304 00655
PARKING ENF
146-400-3401-4304 00002
DIAL A RIDE
$96.88
/TELEPHONE
$191. 26
/TELEPHONE
$85.20
/TELEPHONE
$8.46
/TELEPHONE
$10. 00
/TELEPHONE
$159. 80
/TELEPHONE
*4. 16
/TELEPHONE
R OTEL
EQUIP RENT/OCT 92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
w •H
IV
14
44
M
4.4
44
4
•
01340 001-400-2101-4304
10/22/92 POLICE
PAGE 0007
DATE 10/29/92
1NV/REF PO N CHK N
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*2.031.56
01130 *51. 56
/TELEPHONE
*51.56
R -HARBOR CITY ENTERPRISES, INC. 03571 001-400-2101-4311 01526 *273.81
-,- R18C CHAR0Ee%OCT 72— — Z6 E7� — - 10/13/42 -
POI.ICE /AUTO MAINTCNANCE
VENDOR
TOTAL•***HH***•H*•***•HHH**HHH•*****H**H*•H*•**H1►***********
R .HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS i ASSOC.
03131 001-400-1202-4201 00338*931.81
--�ALCB TAk ADRiti71UL-IEp 1014 14723742 RIFiANeE -ADM1N_ ` /CONTRACT 8ERVICETFRIVAT "
•H VENDOR TOTAL*•**HH*•**HHHU*•***MHHH**H*******•HH**H
*273. 81
R
*731.81
01030 42392
$0 00 10/29/92
01030 42392
$0.00 10/29/92
01030 42392
$0.00 10/29/92
01030 42392
$0.00 10/29/92
01030 42392
$0.00 10/29/92
01030 42392
*0. 00 10/29/92
01030 42392
*0.00 10/29/92
01033 42393
*0. 00 10/29/92
26287 01034
*0.00
42374
10/24/y42
1014 00054 42395
*0.00 10/29/92' --
NIKKI*HUMBAROER 404921 001-300-0000-3893 00675 *57.00 47612/Y100 05711
FALL CLAM) REFUND --
/Y
----------- --------._..- - . _....
100 10/21/92
/CONTR RECREATION CLASSES *0.00
•
42396
10/29/1'1'-
4,
.4
40
50
RJ1
5l
47
7a
71
,y
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
I)
1
ti
FINANCE-8FA340
TIME 16:34:33
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 10/29/92
PAY VENDOR NAP
DESCRIPTION
VND • ACCOUNT NUMIER TRN N AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROD • ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
••• VENDOR TOTAL***********,******wwww**,****.*•wwwwww********wwww******************
R RIC•JENNINOS
GRASS V -BALL TOURNEY DIR
R RIC*JENNINOS
V -BALL LEAGUE DIRECTOR
*** VENDOR TOTAL
04251 001-400-4601-4221 00076
10/26/92 COMM RESOURCES
04251 001-400-4601-4221 00078
10/21/92 COMM RESOURCES
PAGE
DATE
0008 •
10/29/92
INV/REF PO * CHK •
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$57. 00
$1.242. 50
/CONTRACT REC CLASS/PROR
*672. 00
/CONTRACT REC CLASS/PROR
R YUNI*VOGUCHI
FALL CLASS REFUND
r** VENDOR TOTAL
03902 001-300-0000-389.3
45775 10/20/92
*1.914.50
05394 42397
*0. 00 10/29/92
05716 42397
*0. 00 10/29/92
00679 135.00 45775 05718 41398
/CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 10/29/92
R MAC WAREHOUSE
MISC CHARGES/OCT 92
*re VENDOR TOTAL
03810 001-400-2101-4305
99741 10/09/92 POLICE
*35.00
01869 *184 00 A4199741. 01043 42399
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *0.00 10/27/92
R MANHATTAN CAR WASH
MISC CHARGES/SEP 92
R MANHATTAN CAR WASH
MISC. CHARGES/SEP 92
rr• VENDOR TOTAL
01146 001-400-2101-4311
09/30/92 POLICE
$184.00
01725 $53.20
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
01146 001-400-4101-4311 00168 $5.00
09/30/92 PLANNING /AUTO MAINTENANCE
R MICHAELS
MISC CHARGES/OCT 92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
014
03167
10/27/92
$78.20
001-400-4601-4308 00759 *54.62
COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS
R CRAIG*MONTICONE
DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 48102
*** VENDOR TOTAL
04926 001-210-0000-2110
10/22/92
*54.62
00945 42400
*0.00 10/29/92
00947 42400
10.00 10/29/92
014 01047
$0 00
42401
10/29/92
05127 *500.00 48102 05438 42402
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 10/29/92
R NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC
ANNUAL DUES/WI9NIEWSKI 21290
00399 001-400-2201-4315
10/20/92 FIRE
*500. 00
00093 $75.00
/MEMDERSHIP
M621290 03469 42403
*0. 00 10/29/92
•
•
a
•
•
i
•
•
•
FINANCE-SFA340
. TIME 16.34:33
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL
R MARSHA*OLSON
FALL CLASS REFUND
*** VENDOR TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 10/29/92
PAGE 0009
DATE 10/29/92
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT INV/REF PO N CHK *
DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
04917 001-300-0000-3893
47791 10/15/92
*75.00
00683 *30.00 47791 05726
/CONTR RECREATION CLASSES *0.00
R OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER
MISC CHARGES/OCT 92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
00093 001-400-2101-4311
13055 10/29/92 POLICE
*30. 00
01524 *101.21
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
R OVERBYTE COMPUTERS
E-MAIL INSTALLATION
R OVERBYTE COMPUTERS
L. A. N. PILOT PRO° EQUIP
R OVERBYTE COMPUTERS
L.A.N. SYSTEM SUPPLIES
*** VENDOR TOTAL
*101. 21
42404
10/29/92
13055 01052 42405
$0.00 10/29/92
04739 001-400-1206-4201 01056 *180.00 056693 04031 42406
56693 09/21/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *90.00 10/29/92
04739 001-400-1206-5402 00038 *45,153.48 04017 42406
10/28/92 DATA PROCESSING /EQUIP -MORE THAN *500 *47.146.35 10/29/92
04739 001-400-1206-5402 00039 *1.783.96 04023 42406
10/28/92 DATA PROCESSING /EQUIP -MORE THAN *500 *1.783.96 10/29/92
R PACTEL CELLULAR - LA
MOBILE PHONE CHOS/OCT 92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
* * *
*47, 117.44
03209 170-400-2103-4304 00066 *1,742.28
10/29/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /TELEPHONE
R PAK WEST
MISC CHARGES/OCT 92
VENDOR TOTAL
!•^' R PARMA
00519 001-400-4204-4309 02487
42241 10/29/92 BLDG MAINT
*1.742.28
*214. 55
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
*214.55
04462 705-400-1209-4315 00035 *50.00
ANNUAL DUES/R. BLACKWOOD 00991 10/08/92 LIABILITY INS /MEMBERSHIP
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******u*N*****
•
DAVID*PEACE_
THEATRE TECH/SEP 10-20
*50. 00
043 001-400-4601-4201 01590 *209. 00
10/20/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
01053 42407
*0.00 10/29/92
842241 01054 42408
*0.00 10/29/92
'000991 05509 42409
*O. 00 1O/29/42
05708 42410
*0.00 10/29/92
.13
R1
.A
411.
111910111,' 1
FINANCE-BFA340
TIME 16:34:33
Ire,* voroOR NAM.'
DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 10/29/92
vNd' i •`%►CCOINrT MhilWariRN • AMOUNT
DATE INYC PROJ • ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
R PEP BOYS
M1SC CHARGES/OCT 92
R PEP BOYS
MISC CHARGES/OCT 92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
t
PAGE 0010 •
DATE 10/29/92
,*
4R
A
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
do
s
_J
0
INV/REF PO M CMK 0
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*209.00
00608 001-400-3104-4311 00105 *59.53
10/29/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /AUTO MAINTENANCE
00608 110-400-3302-4311 00825 *91.72
10/29/92 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE
R INGRID*PLISKA
FALL CLASS REFUND
04346 001-300-0000-3893
/Y101 10/21/92
*151.25
01056 42411
*0.00 10/29/92
01056 42411
$0.00 10/29/92
00676 *114.00 47632/Y101 05712
/CONTR RECREATION CLASSES *0.00
rrr VENDOR TOTAL********************************r***********************************
R PRISON INDUSTRY AUTHORITY
FLAGS/STOCK 08795
01030
10/06/92
001-400-1208-4305 01141
GEN APPROP
$114.00
*546. 12 205918/208795 04727
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *0.00
*or VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
A RADIO SHACK
MISC CHARGES/OCT 92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
*546 12
01429 105-400-2601-4309 00844 *21.54
98858 10/22/92 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
R ELEANOR*RAYMOND
ANIMAL TRAP REFUND
R ELEANOR*RAYMOND
ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES
*r* VENDOR TOTAL
04925 001-210-0000-2110
46390 10/22/92
04925 001-300-0000-3895
46390 10/22/92
*21. 54
98858 01058
*0.00
05128 *50.00 46390 05439
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00
00043 *7. 70CR
/ANIMAL TRAP FEE
R SYLVIA*ROOT
SECRETARY SERV/10-6-92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
*42. 30
04061 001-400-4102-4201 00378 *195.50
1006 10/19/92 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
R CONNIE*SHIRK
FALL CLASS REFUND
04922 001-300-0000-3893
47874 10/21/92
IIPIPPOIPMEMPNINIMa, ..,,r_+els_ .. ... ..—... f,.q....,14..11•AW...n •.1 .F. w. .
*190.00
46390 05439
$0.00
1006 02000
*0.00
00684 *35.00 47874 05709
/CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00
42 412
10/29/92
4241-1
10/29/92
42414
10/29/92
42415
10/29/92
42415
10/29/92
42416
10/29/92
42417
10/29/92
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 16:34:33
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 10/29/92
VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
80 CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR.
--108-PASS-SALES/SEP 92 90407-
SO
040Y--
SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR.
BUB PASS SALES/AUG 92 - 80408
R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR.
BUS PASS SALES/JUL 92 70405
00843 145-400-3403-42 51 00135
BUS PA88 BUSBOY
00843 145-400-3403-4251 00136
09/28/92
BUS PASS 8UBSDY
00843 145-400-3403-4251 00137
09/28/92
BUS PAS6 6UBSDY
* ** VENDOR TOTAL•***************************************************************
R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT
CITATION COURT BAIL
*** VENDOR TOTAL
00400 110-300-0000-3302
10/27/92
PAGE 0011
DATE 10/29/92
INV/REF PO * CHK M
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*35. 00
*977. 00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
*418. 00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
*573. 00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
*1,968.00
48428 *207.00
/COURT FINES/PARKING
R SOUTH BAY NOTICING AND
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92 ER1OB
*** VENDOR TOTAL
9207. 00
90407 05139 42418
110.00 10/29/92
80408 05138 42418
*0.00 10/29/92
70405 05116 42418
*0. 00 10/29/92
05154
*0. 00
42419
10/29/92
03882 001-400-4101-4201 00170 *460.00 92HER1OB 01064 42420
10/29/92 PLANNING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 10/29/92
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CD.
ELEC BILLS/OCT 92
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
ELEC BILLS/OCT 92
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
ELEC BILLS/OCT 92
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
ELEC BILLS/OCT 92
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
ELEC BILLS/OCT 92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
00159 001-400-3101-4303 00241
10/29/92 MEDIANS
$460.00
489.70
/UTILITIES
00159 001-400-3104-4303 00142 $502.17
10/29/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /UTILITIES
CO. 00159 001-400-4204-4303 006.18 $3,839.86
10/29/92 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES
CO. 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00477 $740. 17
10/29/92 PARKS /UTILITIES
CO. 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00399 $12.12
10/29/92 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES
R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO.
GAS BILLINGS/OCT 92
*5, 184. 02
00170 001-400-4204-4303 00619 *150.32
10/29/92 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES
01066 42421
40.00 10/29/92
01066 42421
$0.00 10/29/92
01066 42421
$0.00 10/29/92
01066 42421
$0.00 10/29/92
01066 42421
40.00 10/29/92
01067 42422
$0.00 10/29/92
I II
•
gib
•
Mak
ar
•
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 16 3433
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL - -
R SPORTMART
MISC CHARGES/OCT 92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 10/29/92
VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROD $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PAGE 0012
DATE 10/29/92
INV/REF PO M CHK M
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$150. 32
03479 001-400-4601-4308 00760 435.53
6271 10/29/92 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS
R J E. *TALLERICO
COMPUTER SERV/OCT 92
*** VENDOR TOTAL
$35.53
04247 001-400-1206-4201 01057 $80.00
171 10/16/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
R TRW-REDI PROPERTY DATA
ANNUAL CONTRACT/FY 92-93 31800
*** VENDOR TOTAL
02976 001-400-4201-4201 00815
10/14/92 BUILDING
180. 00
6271 01069 42423
40.00 10/29/92
171 04033 42424
$0.00 10/29/92
4323.93 0194031800 04253
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00
R JEFFREY*TURNEY
REPLACE LOST WARRANT
*** VENDOR TOTAL
04864 001-210-0000-2110
42085 10/29/92
$323. 93
42423
10/29/92
05130 *50.00 42085 05613 42426
/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 10/29/92
R RICHARD*WAMBSGANS
FALL CLASS REFUND
*** VENDOR TOTAL
04893 001-300-0000-3893
47631 10/20/92
*50. 00
00682 *15.00 47631 05723 42427
/CONTR RECREATION CLASSES *0.00 10/27/72
R LORI*WINDHORST
FALL CLASS REFUND
*** VENDOR TOTAL
M
04918 001-300-0000-3893
47660 10/20/92
*13. 00
00680 $35.00 47660 05719
/CONTR RECREATION CLASSES *0.00
R XEROX CORPORATION
COPIER MAINT/JUL-BEP -92 --
A XEROX CORPORATION
COfI(R MAINT/ L= -0,
00133 001-400-1208-4201 00931
10/05/92 OEN APPROP
'00135 001-400-1208-4201 00732
id/02�92 OEN APPROP
$35.00
*308.73
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*537.97
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
4242B
10/29/92
00021 42429
*0.00 10/29/92
00020
42429
*0.00 10/27/72... -
9
FINANCE-8FA340
TIME 16:34:33
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 10/29/92
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
••
•
•
XEROX CORPORATION
-CDPIEVUBE/MAINT/wium 92
XEROX CORPORATION
IES -8E0-
2
'J R XEROX CORPORATION
CDPIER- -
I.. R XEROX CORPORATION
___ __.--C IER'MAMTTjvL-SEP *'2
••* VENDOR TOTAL ***•**********
VNO M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ • ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00135
107011/72
00135
10/05/92
001-400-1208-4201 00933
OEN_APPROP _
001-400-2401-4201 00357
ANIMAL CONTROL
00135 001-400-4601-4201 01581
1O7057i2- COMM RESOURCES
00135 110-400-3302-4201 00370
10/6374-2 PARKING ENF
PAGE 0013
DATE 10/29/92
INV/REF PO * CHK M
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*373. 75
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*92.81
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*281.25 '
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*188. 44
/CONTRACT BERVICE/PRIVAT
••* PAY CODE TOTAL ****
*** TOTAL WARRANTS
*1,782.97
*80,392.13
$B2, 049. 113
00007 42429
*0.00 10/29/92-
00024
0/29/92._
00024 42429
*0.00 10/29/92
00025 42429
*0.00 10/29/92
00024 42429
*0.00 10/29%92
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVFREO RY
THE WARI1AN1S LISTED ON PAC,Eq J TO ��
__ _ Ifiry IP•IVr. or THE
WARRANT RI GI':I IR IOIt . )O q/9�
Mir AVS, 7 :'1 II L I•
IO 1H hIIIARIE I
,
BY
DAIL
INArjI:F. 1101!
/ ° 6A/K+.
IS
'9
46.
4114.
a
a
S
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:56:56
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 11/05/92
PAGE 0001
DATE 11/05/92
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
H COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR
DEPOSIT/LIABILITY ACCT
04928 705-106-0000-1102 00034 $30,000.00
11/03/92 DEPOSIT—LIABILITY CLAIMS
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $30,000.00
SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT
CITATION COURT BAIL
05513 42431
$0. 00 11/05/92
00400 110-300-0000-3302 48485 $22.00 05157
11/02/92 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $22.00
***
FAY CODE TOTAL ******************************************************************
•
1 •
•
R ADVANCE ELEVATOR
ELEVATOR MAINT/NOV 92
00003 001-400-4204-4201 00546
29633 11/01/92 BLDG MAINT
$30, 022. 00
42430
11/05/92
$90.00 29633 00003 42435
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/05/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
$90. 00
-o
R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS
RADIO MAINT/NOV 92
R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS
00935 001-400-2101-4201 01146
$2,307.50
62497 00048 42436
62497 10/25/92 POLICE
00935 001-400-2201-4201 00342
131
RADIO MAINT/NOV 92
R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS
RADIO MAINT/JUL—NOV 92
62497
10/25/92
FIRE
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$195. 00
$0.00 11/05/92
62497 00048 42436
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
00935 110-400-3302-4307 00066 $1,197.50
62379 10/25/92 PARKING ENF /RADIO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
$3,700.00
$0.00 11/05/92
62379 00058 42436
$0.00 11/05/92
2,
6 ,
‘7.7
1,74
71
v10#
774
2)
211
31
3Z
33
34
35
43
:1'.7 •
• ALFAX MANUFACTURING CORP.
WALL RACK/BUILDING DEPT
yr,
00191 001-400-4201-5401 00038 $210.25
11/04/92 BUILDING /EQUIP—LESS THAN $500
*** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $210.25
04257 42437
$0.00 11/05/92
SI
54
•11
4 1
45
• •
'
R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
00857 001-400-2101-4306 01275 $161.70
7154 11/03/92 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
• AVIATIONLOCK & KEY
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
00407 001-400-2401-4309 00197
10/30/92 1 ANIMAL CONTROL
$161. 70
$23. 00
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
7154 00105 42438
$0.00 11/05/92 Cr
00107 42439
$0.00 11/05/92
.61
0
0
• •
•
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:56:56.
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R AVIATION LOCK & KEY
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
R AVIATION LOCK & KEY
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
R AVIATION LOCK & KEY
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
R AVIATION LOCK & KEY
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
R AVIATION LOCK & KEY
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 11/05/92
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00407 001-400-4204-4201 00545
10/30/92 BLDG MAINT
00407 001-400-4204-4309 02492
10/30/92 BLDG MAINT
00407 001-400-4204-4321 00687
10/30/92 BLDG MAINT
00407 001-400-4601-4305 01097
10/30/92 COMM RESOURCES
PAGE 0002
DATE 11/05/92
INV/REF PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*63. 00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*70.66
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
00107 42439
$0.00 11/05/92
00107 42439
$0.00 11/05/92
$6.12 00107 42439
/BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT $0.00 11/05/92
*5. 41 00107
/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00
00407 105-400-2601-4309 00846 *96.07
10/30/92 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
***-VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
.....____ •
***
DEBI ANN*BABAKITIS
CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 52428
04934 110-300-0000-3302 48486
11/02/92
*266. 26
$213. 00
/COURT FINES/PARKING
VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
R BANC ONE LEASING 99
LEASE PMT/NOV 92
*28. 00
42439
11/05/92
2
14
15
15
I T
19
.;;
22
00107 42439 24
*0.00 11/05/92
25
27
25
952428 05616 42440
$0.00 11/05/92
02154 001-400-4205-6900 00122 *417.96
11/01/92 EQUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS
*** VENDOR ToTAL ******************************************************************** *417.96
R BLICKMAN, INC.
THEATRE TECH/OCT 15-24
15
39
00030 42441 4,3
*0.00 11/05/92 11
03092 001-400-4601-4201 01593 *266.00
11/03/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
_ *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************
R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
*266.00
01308 001-400-1212-4188 02539 *66.10
11/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *66.10
• .11
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
. .
R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
01293 001-400-1212-4188 02532 *16,971.38
11/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
05748 42442
*0. 00 1i/05/92
41)
1..71
51
' 1
00055 42443
$0.00 11/05/92 -Thr
00056 42444
so:oo i1/05/92
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:56:56
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 11/05/92
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTIQN
R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R
BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
PAGE 0003
DATE 11/05/92
INV/REF PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
01293 110-400-3302-4188 01623 31,086.93 00056 42444
11/01/92 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 30.00
01293 125-400-8513-4188 00058 328.30
11/01/92 CIP 92-513 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
01293 170-400-2.103-4188 00339 3264.12
11/01/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE DENEFITS
01293 705-400-1217-4188 00705___ 3141.51
11/01/92 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 318,492.24
BOO BEARS RESTAURANT
LUNCHES/SENIOR TRIP
11/05/92
00056 42444
30.00 11/05/92
00056 42444
30. 00 11/05/92
00056 42444
30.00 11/05/92
04932 001-400-4601-4201 01591 3190.80
11/02/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
3190.80
05747 42445
30.00 11/05/92-
BROWNING
1/05/92
DROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00155 001-400-1208-4201 00939 3610.13 00005
TRASH PICKUP/NOV 92 11/01/92 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 30.00
R DROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES
TRASH PICKUP/NOV 92
00155 109-400-3301-4201 00154 3516.63
11/01/92 VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY
31, 126.76
42446
11/05/92
00005 42446
30.00 11/05/92
00034 001-400-2101-4305 01873 385.38
BAGS/PAPER SHREDDER
05054
10/26/92 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
385. 38
R • C. D. V. A. 01882 001-400-4601-4315 00108 3100.00
TOURNEY DIRECTOR DUES 37140 11/03/92 COMM RESOURCES /MEMBERSHIP
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
385. 38
42447
2
6
10
11
13
15
in
19
:7
2n
31
,2
,.t
17
w
'.9
40
4I
47
11/05/92
n
37140 05744 42448
3100.00
00238 001-400-1212-4188 02541 3867.93
11/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
30.00 11/05/92
.1
62
53
62
!3
00041. 42449 s:
$0:00---11/05/92---
5]
FP
ver
AIM
J
Pad
1
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:56:56
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R
R
R
R
R
•
CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 11/05/92
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00238 105-400-2601-4188 01355 $28.56
11/01/92 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00238 109-400-3301-4188 00330
11/01/92 VEH PKG DIST
00238 11.0-4.00-3302-4188 01628
11/01/92 PARKING ENF
CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92 11/01/92
CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92 11/01/92
CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92 11/01/92
R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92 11/01/92
CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 002238
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92 11/01/92
R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92 11/01/92
R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92 11/01/92
R CA, PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
115-400-8141-4188 0003.6
CIP 89-141
115-400-8144-4188 0005.4_
CIP 90-144
115-400-8178-4188 00054
CIP 90-178
125-400-8513-4188 00063
CIP 92-513
155-400-2102-4188 00857
CROSSING GUARD
160-400-3102-4188 01337
SEWER/ST DRAIN
160-400-8408-4188 00045
CIP 89-408 -
00238 705-400-1209-4188 00638
R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
11/01/92 LIABILITY INS
00238 705-400-1217-4188 00710
11/01/92 --......._........ WORKERS.. COMP .....-
PAGE 0004
DATE 11/05/92
INV/REF PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP _
$2.52 _
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$111.72
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$1.26
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$2. 10
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$5.04
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$1. 68
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$1.68
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$21. 00
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$1.26
%EMPLOYEE. BENEFITS
$4. 20
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$6.30
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL ##******************#****• *#***#**#**#+r*tt•tr*#**##*#*#*-n•n#*#***##****
CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUN.
ANN DUES/V. COPELAND 106
00041
$0.00
1
3
6
42449
11/05/92
00041 42449
$0.00 11/05/92
$0. 00
00001
42449
11/05/92
11
12
1
42449 .9
$0.00 11/05/92
00041 42449
$0.00 11/05/92
00041 42449
$0.00 11/05/92
$1,055.25
$0. 00
42449
11/05/92
22
23
27
.•n
ll
00041 42449
$0.00 11/05/92 - �+
00001 42449
$0.00 11/05/92----
$1.26
1/05/92-T
00001 42449
$0.00 11/05/92
00041 42449
$0.00 11/05/92-
$1,055.25 1/05/92-
00041 42449
$0.00 11/05/52-
17 1/05/52-
•n
621
00590 001-4.00-1202-4315 00062 $85.0__0
10/15/92 FINANCE ADMIN /MEMBERSHIP
*** VENDOR TOTAL****************************#****•p***•p*****#*************•it*******•x**
•
CANADA LIFE
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
$85. 00
106 05620 42450
$0.00 11/05/42 -
00046 001-400-1212-4188 02542 $638.55
11/01/92 , EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00008 42451
$0.00---11/05/92-
1' 1
6,1
71
•
y
*
1
0.00--.--11/05/92---
I
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:56:56
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CANADA LIFE
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV-92
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 11/05/92
VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER
DATE INVC PROJ #
TRN # AMOUNT
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
INV/REF
PAGE 0005
DATE 11/05/92
PO # CNK #,
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
00046 170-400-2103-4188 00343 $96.75 00008 42451 _
11/01792 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 11/05/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL****************..***************************************************
R JEFF*CARR
ANIMAL TRAP REFUND
$735.30
04930 001-210-0000-2110 05134 $50.00 48384 0544.2
48384 10/29/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00
JEFF*CARR
ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES 48384
04930 001-300-0000-3895 00047 $7.70CR
10/29/92 /ANIMAL TRAP FEE
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$42. 30
48384 05442
$0.00
42452 _
11/05/92
42452
11/05/92
CHAMPION CHEVROLET
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
R CHAMPION CHEVROLET
00014 001-400-2101-4311
224 11/01/92 POLICE
01532 $277.29
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
00014 001-400-2401-4311 00284 $74.01
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
CHAMPION CHEVROLET
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
224
11/01/92 ANIMAL CONTROL /AUTO MAINTENANCE
00014 105-400-2601-4311 00288 $30.08
224 11/01/92 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
BRANDI*CRACRAFT
FALL CLASS REFUND
47621
$381. 38
224 01013 42453 _
$0.00 11/05/92-
224
1/05/92
224 01013 42453
$0.00 11/05/92
224 01013 42453
$0.00 11/05/92
R
13
11
11
13
14
10
39
70
21
23
24
JC
2]
J!/
n
'.2
31
1.1
04940 001-300-0000-3893
10/29/92
00709 $45.00 47621 05730
/CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R
R
DAPPER TIRE CO.
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
01390 001-400-1207-4311 00067
84362 10/15/92 BUS LICENSE
DAPPER TIRE CO.
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92 84362
01390 001-400-2101-4311 01531
R DAPPER TIRE CO.
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92 84362
R _ DAPPER TIRE CO.
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92 84362
10/15/92 POLICE
01390 001-400-4.202-4311 00239
10/15/92 PUB WKS ADMIN
1.01390 110-400-3302-4311 00828
10/15/92 PARKING ENF
$45.00
$61. 70
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
$535. 56
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
42454
11/05/92
84362 01019 42455
$0.00 11/05/92
$61. 71
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
$487. 12
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
84362 01019 42455
$0.00 11/05/92
84362 01019 42455
$0.00 11/05/92-
84362 01019 42455
$0.00 11/05/92
.1:
.10
50
5,
"z
9
61
A
n
i
.80
•
rIw^wos-SrA340
TIME 15:56:56
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 11/05/92
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
_°�*_v��n TOTAL �*°*°**�****�����**�**����**������°°=°°°°����
.
n DIVE N' SURF 00604 001-400-2201-4309
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92 11/01/92 ----FIRE
PAGE 0006
DATE 11/05r92
INV/REF PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$1,146.09.
.
01386 *ao.ou 01021
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00
VENDOR TOTAL °°*****°*******************°*****°**********************************
n
RON*DUPRATT FORD
'--
NARCOTICS VEHICLE521 10/24/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /VEHICLES
04909 170-400-2103-5403 00019 $11,852 .08
°°* VENDOR TOTAL **°*°°**°°****°*°°***********************°*°************************ *11.852.08
n
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
DISCOUNT OFFERED 2250
m EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
DISCOUNT TAKEN 2250
n
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC. CHARGES/OCTOBER 92 2250
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
00165 no� � 00304
10/31792—'—
00165 001 0029e
10/31/92
.42456 __12
.^
,
'"
'"
.,
11/05/92
521 05094 42457
*11.852.oa.11/05/922
"
23
_�
°
*44.54 2250 01027 42459
DISCOUNTS OFFERED --$0.00 11/05/92
2250 01027 42459
/DISCOUNTS TAKEN
00165 001-400-2101-4311 01530 $979.35
10>3I792' ------POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
00165 001 -400 -2e01 -*311 00450 *13.91
n
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC. CHARGES/OCTOBER 92 2250
n
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC: CHARGES/OCTOBER 92 2250
n
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
n
.EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC. CHARGES/OCTOBER 92 2250
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
n
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
10/31/92 FIRE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
10/31,92 ANIMAL CONTROL AUTO MAINTENANCE
00165
10/31/92
001-400-3103-4311 00811 *77.82
ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
00165 001-400-4101-4311 00170 $6.05
10/31792 ---------'PLANNING —'----/AUTO MAINTENANCE
00165 001 -400 -*201-4311 00318
10/31/92 BUILDING
$17.4«
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
00165 001-400-4202-4311 00238 *116.84
10/31/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE
`00165 001 -*00 -420+ -*309 02*91 m38.47
10/31/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
$0.00 11/05/92
2250 01027 42459
$0.00 11/05/92
2250 01027 42459
*o.00 11705/92
2250 01027 42*59
$0.00 11/05/92
25
27
Ps
3'2
31
"
°
�
"
"
39
°
42
°
2250 01027 42459
$0.00 11/05/92
--'s,
°
2250 '--. 42459
$o.00 --'11/o5/92 �
=
°
2250 01027 4e459 �.
$0.00 11/05/92
e250 01027 42459
$0.00 11,05/92
01027
42459
'
.
FINANCE-SFA340
TIt-lE 15:56:56
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 11/05/92
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
PAGE 0007
DATE 11/05/92
INV/REF PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-40.0-420.4-4311 00.229 $59.67
MISC. CHARGES/OCTOBER 92 2250 10/31/92 BLDG MAINT /AUTO MAINTENANCE
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC. CHARGES/OCTOBER 92 2250
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC. CHARGES/OCTOBER 92 2250
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC. CHARGES/OCTOBER 92 2250
R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
00165 00.1-400-4205-4309 00678 $162.20
10/31/92 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
00165 001-400-4205-4311 00283 $169.90
MISC. CHARGES/OCTOBER 92 2250
10/31/92 EQUIP SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE
00165 001-400-6101-4311. 00291 $3.01
10/31/92 PARKS /AUTO MAINTENANCE
00165 105-400- 26.0.1-4311 00287 $85. 47
10/31/92 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 110-400-3302-4311 00827 $385.80
MISC. CHARGES/OCTOBER 92 2250 10/31/92 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE
R _ EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS
MISC.CHARGES/OCTOBER 92 2250
00165 160-400-3102-4311 00211 $26.57
10/31/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$2, 182.35
2250 01027 42459 _
$0.00 11/05/92
2250 01027
$0. 00
42459
11/05/92
2250 01027 42459._
$0.00 11/05/92
2250 01027
--_ $0. 00
42459
11/05/92
2250 01027 42459
$0.00 11/05/92
2250 01027 42459
11/05/92
$0. 00
2250 01027 42459
$0.00 11/05/92
R EFRAM MOBIL
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
01400 001-400-2101-4310 00379 $54.90
11/01/92 POLICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
S
$54. 90
01028 42460 _
$0.00 11/05/92
ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 02354 001-400-3103-6900 00117 $1.736.78 00043 42461
11/01/92 ST MAINTENANCE /LEASE PAYMENTS
LEASE PMT/NOV 92
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R GANDALF DATA, INC.
MODEM MAINT/JUL-DEC 92 4914
$1,736.78
$0.00 11/05/92
01432 001-400-1206-4201 0,1062 $1,092.00 491.4 00018 42462
10/22/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/05/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$1,092.00
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE ` 04397 0.0.1-400-1.2.1.2-4188 0253.7 $399.40 00028 42463
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92 11/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 11/05/92-
2
1/05/92-
2
3
8
tO
U
14
15
15
18
19
29
21
43
2a
2.5
25
27
.91
]4
75
,5
M
4;
8
51
2
68
111
6'
5,.
07
•
.
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:56:56
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE_
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSU_RANCE
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
GITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 11/05/92
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
04397 10.5-400-2601-4188 01353 $16.10
11/01/92 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
04397 109-400-3301-4188 00328
11/01/92 VEH PKG DIST
04397 1.10-400-3302-4188 01626
11/01/92 PARKING ENF
04397 115-400-8144-4188 00052
11/01/92 CIP 90-144 .
04397 115-400-8178-4188 00052
11/01/92 CIP 90-178
04397 125-400-8513-4188 00061
11/01/92 CIP 92-513
04397
11/01/92
155-400-2102-4188 00855
CROSSING GUARD
04397 160-400-3102-4189 01335
11/01/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN
$1.38
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$65. 78
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$1.15
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$2. 76
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0. 92
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0. 92
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$12. 42
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
04397 170-400-2103-4188 00341 $28.75
11/01/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
04397 705-400-1209-4188 00636
11/01/92 LIABILITY INS
04397 705-400-1217-4188 00708
11/01/92 WORKERS COMP
$2. 30
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$3. 45
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
PAGE 0008
DATE 11/05/92
INV/REF PO # CHK # 3
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
00028
42463
$0.00 11/05/92
00028 42463
$0.00 11/05/92
00028
42463 5
$0.00 11/05/92
00028 42463
$0.00 .11/05/92
00028 42463•
_ 3
$0.00 11/05/92
00028 42463
$0.00 11/05/92
00028
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $535.33
R _ _ GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R GUARDIAN DENTAL
. CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
T.
R GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
02623 001-400-1212-4188 02535 $2,962.89
11/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
42463
$0.00 11/05/92
00028 42463
$0.00 11/05/92
00028 42463
$0.00 11/05/92
00028 42463
$0.00 11/05/92
00028 42463
$0.00 '11/05/92
00001 42464
$0. 00 -11/05/92 -
02623
--11/05/92-
02623 105-400-2601-4188 01351 $9.33 00001 42464
11/01/92 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 11/05/92
'02623 110-400-3302-4188 01624 $85.61 00001 42464
11/01/92 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$0.00 11/05/92
13
SI
J
J
J
1
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:56:56
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 11/05/92
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
V
R
GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
GUARDIAN DENTAL
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
PAGE 0009
DATE 11/05/92
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
02623 11.5-400-8141-4188 00033
11/01/92 CIP 89-141
02623 115-400-8144-4188 00050
11/01/92 CIP 90-144
02623 115-400-8178-4188 00050
11/01/92 CIP 90-178
02623 125-400-8513-4188 000.59
11/01/92 CIP 92-513
02623 16.0-400-3102-4188 01333
11/01/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN
02623 16.0-400-8408-4188 000.42_
11/01/92 CIF 89-408
$6. 70
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$3.35
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$1.3.40
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$3. 35
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$9. 33
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$6.70
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
02623 170-4.0.0-210.3-4188 00340 $82.84
11/01/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
02623 705-400-1209-4188 00634
11/01/92 LIABILITY INS
02623 705-400-121.7-4188 00706
11/01/92 WORKERS COMP
$33. 52
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$50. 28
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** ENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO.
STREET SWEEPER PARTS
R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO.
ELGIN SWEEPER PARTS
5579
00731
10/12/92
00001 42464
$0.00 11/05/92---
00001
$0. 00
00001
42464
11/0/92
42464
$0. 00 11 /05/92
00001 42464
$0.00 11/03/92'
00001 42464
$0.00 11/05/92
0.0001 42464
$0.00 11/05/,)2
00001 42464
$0.00 11/05/92
00001 42464
$0.00 11/05/92
00001 42464
$3,267.30
$0.00 11/05/92
001-400-3103-4311 00809
ST MAINTENANCE
00731 001-400-3103-4311 00810
10/08/92 ST MAINTENANCE
$990. 49
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
$187.33
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,177.82
R
HEALTHNET
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R HEALTHNET
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
5579 05269 42465
$984.-79 -11 /05/92-
05268 42465
$182.45 11/05/92 -
00241 001-400-1212-4188 02531 $16,527.39
11/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
•00241 105-400-2601-4188 01350 $83.0.07
11/01/92 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00016 42466
$0. 00 11/05/92
00016 42466
$0. 00 11/05/92-
2 1/05/92
2
6
10
I1
14
15
16
i,
18
19
'6
27
31
3$
33
3-1
25
26
3,
38
19
11
42
4,1
47
61
5r
7,7
:A
63
67
)1
St
910
r
D
J
-1
J
.60
.N
.✓
.20
v
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:56:56
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R HEALTHNET
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R HEALTHNET
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
HEALTHNET
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R HEALTHNET
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
HEALTHNET
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
HEALTHNET
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 11/05/92
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
00241
11/01/92
1.09-400-3301-4188 0032.6_
VEH PKG DIST
00241 110-400-3302-4188 01622
11/01/92
00241
11/01/92
00241
11/01/92
PARKING ENF
1.15-400-8144-4188 00049
CIP 90-144 _.-_..
1.15-400-8178-4188 00049
CIP 90-178
00241 125-400-8513-41.88 000.57
11/01/92 CIP 92-513
00241
11/01/92
15.5-400-21.02-4188 00853
CROSSING GUARD
$62. 89
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$2, 121. 71
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$50.31
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$100.61
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$25.16
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$50.31
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R HEALTHNET 00241 160-400-3102-4188 01332 $603. 70
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
PAGE 0010
DATE 11/05/92
INV/REF PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
11/01/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
HEALTHNET 00241 160-400-8408-4188 00041 $31.44
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92 11/01/92 CIP 89-408 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
R HEALTHNET 00241 170-400-2103-4188 00338 $781.42
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
HEALTHNET
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R HEALTHNET
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
11/01/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
00241 705-400-1209-4188 00633
11/01/92 LIABILITY INS
00241
11/01/92
705-400-1217-4188 00704
WORKERS COMP
$153. 92
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$153. 92
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***********itaHtitat****iti ******** t**************it*******prat#acs**********
- I, I
CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH
INTEREST RCVD/6-30-92
R CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH
REIMB WORK COMP/OCT 92
04073 709-115-0000-1230 09004
10/28/92
$21,492.85
$821. 66CR
/OTHER ACCTS RECEIVABLE
04075 703-400-1217-4182 00253 $18,423.75
10/28/92 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $17,602.09
GEORGE*HILL CONSTRUCTION
WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 32870
00016
$0. 00
42466
11/05/92
00016 42466
$0.00 11/05/92
00016
$0. 00
42466
11/05/92
00016 42466
$0.00 .11/05/92
00016 42466
$0.00 11/05/92
00016 42466
$0.00 11/05/92
00016 42466
$0.00 11/05/92
00016 42466
$0.00 11/05/92
Th
2
,
14
15
. f.
.1
00016 42466
$0.00---11/05/92
43
00016
$0. 00
42466
11/05/92
00016 42466
$0.00 11/05/92
05510 42467
$0.00 - 11/05/92--
05510 42467
$0. 00 11/05/92
04929 001-210-0000-2110 05133 $2,125.00 32870 05428 42468
10/19/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE
$0. 00 - 11/05/92
.11
a
a
a
a
r
•
•
V
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:56:56
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0011
FOR 11/05/92 DATE 11/05/92
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$2,125.00.
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
R CHRISTINE G.*IACONO 04931 001-300-0000-3808 0.0105 $967.50 33445 05802 42469
VARIANCE FEE REFUND 33445 10/21/92 /ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW $0.00 11/05/92
CHRISTINE G.*IACONO
04931 001-300-0000-3868 00109 $319.75 33445 05802 42469
NOTICING FEE REFUND 33445 10/21/92 /PUBLIC NOTICING/300 FT $0.00 11/05/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
DISCOUNT OFFERED
INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
DISCOUNT TAKEN
$1,287.25
02458 001-202-0000-2021 00306 $13.59 01037 42470
10/31/92 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 11/05/92
02458 001-202-0000-2022 00300 *13.59CR
10/31/92 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN
01037 42470
$0.00 11/05/92
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-400-4204-4309 02494 $403.81 00037 42470
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92 10/31/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 11/05/92
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-400-4205-4309 00679
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
10/31/92 EQUIP SERVICE
$23.00
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
01037 42470
$0.00 11/05/92
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-400-6101-4309 01325 $44.57 01037 42470
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92 10/31/92 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 11/0592
INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 105-400-2601-4309 00847 $128.82 01037 42470
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92 10/31/92 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 11/05/92
J
IA
71
..1
75
3,
32
31
N
3c_
_.1"
R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 125-400-8506-4309 00051 $213.87 01037 42470 4n
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92 10/31/92 CIP 86-506
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
* * *
$814.07
$0.00 — 11 /05/92----
R LINDA*JORGENSON 04935 110-300-0000-3302 48487 $20.00 23043.60_05615 _ 42471
CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 04360 11/02/92 /COURT FINES/PARKING - $0.00 11/05/92
VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.00
17
r.
CHARLES H.*LEWIS '•01418 001-400-2101-4312 02032 $49.40 04597 42472
REIMB MILES/POST CLASS 11/02/92 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 11/05/92
J
J
v
1
1
' --
'/ /
.`' *°* vsmoon,nzr*L ****************************°********°******************************
' FINANCE-sn^000
TIME 15:56:56
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST PAGE 0012
FOR 11/05/92 DATE 11/05/92
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
*** VENDOR TOTAL °*******°**************************************************°***w**** $49.40
`
R LIsaser, CASSIDY u FRIERSON 02175 001 -*00-1203-4201 00973 $350.00 05512 42473 1?
LEGAL SERV/SEP 92 11/02/92 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/05/92
°*° VENDOR ror�� °**°°°********°**°*�*********°***************°*°***°*°*****°***°**** *000 oo
--- -_- �
n
MANERI SIGN CO., INC. 01255 001-400-310+-4309 009e1 *2.095.1e 11142 05261 42474
STREET SIGNS/CITY-WIDE 11142 /0r07/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS —'— $2.078.94
*** vsNson TOTAL ***********°*****°*********************°****************************
11/05/92 "'
=
°
.n MANHATTAN FORD 00605 00o
ono«a *�or��� 1046 *2475 ��
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92 /o/2v/9o_ MEDIANS /AUTO MAINTENANCE�------ *o�oo ��/on/p±--�
^�
n MANHATTAN FORD 001-400-3103-4311 00812 *�or��� �o�rn
_ ,
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92 10/29/92 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 11/05/92
°�
"
-e
OP'
• MANHATTAN FORD 00605 105-400-2601-431/ 00289 $5.26 01046 *e475
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92 10/29/92 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 11/05/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL ***°***************************************************************°
��
KENNETH A.*nssesmvo 04138 001 -*00-1132-4201 001e0 $5.600.00 05099 42476
LEGAL SERV/SEP 92 11/02/92 CTY PROSECUTOR /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/05/92
nn,snS STEVENS & COMPANY
tIry HEALTH INS/NOV 92
00091 001-400-1212-418e 02533
11/01/92 EMP BENEFITS/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$772.20
*** VENDOR TOTAL *°****°********°*************************°**********°*************** *772.20
^� n
]
'41!
°
~
.•
00013 42477
$0.00 11/05/92
"
.
`'
.
-
NATIONAL HOME LIFE _ 03465 001-400-1212-4188 02534 $80.00 00065 42478 -_,
11/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 11/05/12 ',
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
*** VENDOR TOTAL ****°°*°**°**°************+°*******************************v***°**** $80.00
n m^n- PUBLIC EMPLOYER LABOR 03148 001-400-1203-4315 00073
*135.00 231 05511 42479
ANNUAL ouca/aLAoxu000 ooi 11/02/92- PERSONNEL /MEMBERSHIP -------� - *o.00 11/05/92-
0.!
..
.
.
'~
°
. >
ee
FINANCE—SFA340
TIME 15:56:56
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 11/05/92
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER
DATE INVC PROJ #
TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
PAGE 0013
DATE 11/05/92
PO # CHK #
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R NEW PACIFIC LUMBER CO.
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
$135.00.
00606 1.60-400-3102-4309 00741 $87.89 619294 01051 42480
.
19294 10/01/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 11/05/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
$87. 89
00093 001-400-2101-4311 01533 $556.71
10/29/92 POLICE
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
I1.1 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
r.
PAGENET
PAGING SERV/NOV 92
R PAGENET
PAGING SERV/NOV 92
PAGENET
PAGING SERV/NOV 92
R PAGENET
PAGING SERV/NOV 92
PAGENET
PAGING SERV/NOV 92
R PAGENET
PAGING SERV/NOV 92
02487 001-400-1.201-4201 00152
11/01/92 CITY MANAGER
02487 001-400-1203-4201 00974
11/01/92 PERSONNEL
02487 001-400-2101-4201 01145
11/01/92 POLICE
02487 001-400-2401-4201 00361
11/01/92 ANIMAL CONTROL
02487 001-400-420.2-4201 00390
11/01/92 PUB WKS ADMIN
02487 001-400-4601-4201 01594
11/01/92 COMM RESOURCES
$556. 71
01052
$0. 00
42481
11/05/92
$11.00 00049 42462
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00
$11.00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$199. 00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$11.00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$110.00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$22. 00
/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $364.00
R PLAZA THEATRE
SENIOR TRIP TICKETS
04933 001-400-4601-4201 01592 $475.20
11/02/92 COMM RESOURCES CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $475.20
R CITY OF*REDONDO BEACH
KIDS CLUB "WAVE" PASSES
11/05/92--
00049 42482
$0.00 11/05/92
00049 42482
$0.00 11/05/92
00049 42482
P
10
11
12
14
Is
16
17
Is
13
:o
21
:3
14
:fl
3,,
'I
32
33
34
35
.,n
$0.00 11/05/92
00049 42482
$0.00 11/05/92
00049 42482
$0.00 11/05/92
11
47
.n
a
31
05746 42483 J
'.03282 145-400-3409-4201 00033 $75.0.00
11/02/92 REC TRANSPTN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
$0.00--11 /05/ 92
05745 42484
$0.00---11/05/92-
:1
0.00. 11/05/92
v
v
1
y
y
v
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:56:56
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
R CITY OF*REDONDO BEACH
DIAL-A-RIDE/JUL-SEP 92
R CITY OF*REDONDO BEACH
DIAL-A-RIDE/JUL-SEP 92
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 11/05/92
PAGE 0014 .�
DATE 11/05/92
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK P
DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
03282 146-300-0000-3854 00001 $64.40CR
11/03/92
/FARES. DIAL A RIDE
I
03282 146-400-3401-4251 00001 _ $21.408.94
11/03/92 DIAL A RIDE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT
*** VENDOR TOTAL **********#- ************************** *********** ****************** $22,094.54
R SYLVIA*ROOT
SEC SERVICE/10-20-92
04061 001-400-4102-4201 00380 $192.00
1020 10/27/92 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $192.00
SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS
CITY.HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS
04398 001-400-1212-4188 02540 $966.23
11/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
04398 105-400-2601-4188 01354 $61.70
11/01/92 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
04398 109-400-3301-4188 00329 $5.79
11/01/92 VEH PfrG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
04398 110-400-3302-4188 01627 $17.2.61
11/01/92 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
04398 115-400-8141-4188 0003.5 $0. 54
11/01/92 CIP 89-141 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
04398 115-400-8144-4188 00053 $2.18
11/01/92 CIP 90-144 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
04398 115-400-8178-4188 00053
11/01/92 CIP 90-178
04398 125-400-8513-4188 00062
11/01/92 CIP 92-513
04398 155-400-2102-4188 00856
11/01/92 / CROSSING GUARD
R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS '04398
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92 11/01/92
160-400-3102-4188 01336
SEWER/ST DRAIN
$4. 34
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$2. 07
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$4.70
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
05804 42464 _
$0.00 11/05/92
05804 42484
$0.00 11/05/92
12
1020 05803 42485
$0.00 .11/05/92
00019 42486
$0.00 11/05/92
00019 42486
$0.00 11/05/92
00019 42486
$0.00 11/05/92
00019 42486
$0. 00 11/05/92
00019 42486
$0.00 11/05/92'
00019 42486
2.2
23
J_1
h;1
3-2
31
,2
35
1.1
$0. 00----11/05/92 -'
Iii J
00019 42486
$0.00 11/05/92
00019 42486
$0.-00-11/05/92-
$4.70
0�00---11/05/92-
00019 42486
$0.00 11/05/92-
$44.65
1/05/92
$44.65 00019 42486
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00---11/05/92
J
J
J
.I
F I F4r,; !CE-SFA340
TIME 15:56:56
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 11/05/92
PAGE 0015
DATE 11/05/92
PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
F1',FEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 160-400-8408-4188 00044 $0.54 00019 42486
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92 11/01/92 CIP 89-408 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 .. 11/05/92 _
R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS' 04398 170-400-2103-4188 00342 $62.88
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92 11/01/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL#******************************************************************* $1,328.23
R KEN*SCHMIDT
TENNIS CHALLENGE REFUND 47969 10/29/92 /OTHER RECREATION PROGRMS $0.00 11/05/92-
00019 42486
$0.00 11/05/92
04939 001-300-0000-3894 00121 $11.00 47969 05728 42487
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
SEPULVEDA BLDG. SUPPLY
BRICKS/PARKS DEPT 03618
$11. 00
02655 001-400-6101-4309 01323 $120.97 503618 05270
10/15/92 PARKS
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $136.93
*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $120.97
42488
11/05/92
T
4
6
IC
11
IP
14
15
15
IC
19
co
14
35
77
15
it
12
SHORELINE PRINTING 03505 00.1-4.00-42.01-4305 00807 $205.68 9863 04252 42489 An
RES BLDG REPORT FORMS 9863 10/15/92 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $205.68 11/- 3,
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
$205.68
SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 0.01-400-4204-4309 024.93 $53.71 25-80070 01061 42490
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92 80070 10/12/92 BLDG MAINT MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 11/05/92
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
00114 001-40.0-2.101-4306
10/29/92 POLICE
$53. 71
01276 $95.37 01062
/PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************************4*********
$95. 37
42
4]
4n
51
42491
11/05/92
R THE*SO CALIFORNIA EMERGENCY 04938 001-400-2101-4316 00955 $40.00 04596 42492
REGISTRATION/K. MITCHELL
*** VENDOR
TOTAL
SUMITOMO BANK
LEASE PMT/NOV 92
1
10/27/92 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 11/05/92
61
$40. 00
04751 001-400-3104-6900 00108 $855.11 00066 42493
11/01/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 11/05/92
J
i
F 1 MANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:56:56
PAY VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 11/05/92
VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
*** VENDOR TOTAL*************************•********************************** i********
R TASF<. FORCE TIPS
REPAIR FIRE HOSE NOZZLE 20999
04937 001-400-2201-4311
10/27/92 FIRE
PAGE 0016
DATE 11/05/92
INV/REF PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
$855. 11 •
00449 $39. 10
/AUTO MAINTENANCE
_ ,_ENn!R TOTAL *=*,x- *x****•***•****•********************************************** $39. 10
TODD PIPE & SUPPLY
DISCOUNT OFFERED
TODD FIFE & SUPPLY
DI=COUNT TAKEN
R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY
MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92
00124 001-202-0000-2021 00305 $6.25
10/31/92
DISCOUNTS OFFERED
00124 001-202-0000-2022 00299 $6.25CR
10/31/92 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN
00124 00.1-4.00-3101-4309
10/31/92 MEDIANS
00162 $68. 54
/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
00124 001-400-6101-4309 01324 $151.49
10/31/92 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
920999 03473 42494
$0.00 11/05/92
01073 42495
$0.00 '11/05/92
01073 42495
$0.00 11/05/92-
01073
1/05/92
01073 42495
$0.00 11/05/92
la
t5
,5
19
9
1=�
::3
'A
01073 42495
1n�v
00124 160-4.00-3102-4309 00742 $86.41 01073
10/31/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL
CITY HEALTH IN5/NOV 92
R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL
CITYHEALTHINS/NOV 92
TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL
CITY HEALTH IN5/NOV 92
$306.44
00240 001-400-1212-4188 02.538_
11/01/92 EMP BENEFITS
00240 705-400-1209-4188 00637
11/01/92 LIABILITY INS
00240 705-400-1217-4188 00709
11/01/92 WORKERS COMP
$269.35
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$5.08
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
$5.08
/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
R UNION METAL CORPORATION
ST LITE POLES/HERM AVE
�•,.I *** VENDOR
00405 10.5-400-8201-5499 00022
08/25/92 CIP 85-201
$279.51
$1,109.72
%NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS •
TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,109.72
UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS.
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
03790 001-400-1212-4188 02536 $2,176.66
11/01/92
EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
42495
11/05/92
00029 42496
$0.00 11/05/92
00029 42496
$0.00- 11/05/92
00029 42496
$0.00 11/05/92'
05212 42497
$1, 117. 14 - 11/05/92
00022 42498
$0.00 11/05/92
.11
1
FINANCE-SFA340
TIME 15:56:56
PAY
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEMAND LIST
FOR 11/05/92
VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 105-400-2601-4188 01352 $82.55
11/01/92 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS.
CITY HEALTH INS/NDV 92 '
R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS.
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS.
03790
11/01/92
109-400-3301-4188. 00327 $9.00
VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
03790 1.10-400-3302-4188 01625 $350.07
11/01/92 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
03790 115-400-81.41-4188 00034 $4.50
11/01/92 CIP 89-141 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
03790 115-400-8144-4188 00051 $7.11
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS.
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS.
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS.
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
PAGE 0017
DATE 11/05/92
INV/REF PO # CHK #
AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP
00002 42498
$0.00 11/05/92-
00022 42498
$0.00 11/05/92
3
4
8
•
14
•
00022 42498 15
$0. 00 11/05/92
11/01/92 CIP 90-144 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
03790 115-400-8178-4188 . 00051 $17.21
11/01/92 CIP 90-178 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
03790 125-400-8513-4188 00060 $4.96
11/01/92 CIP 92-513 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
03790 155-400-2102-4188 00854 $6.00
UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS.
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS.
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS.
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
CITY HEALTH INS/NOV 92
$0. 00
42498
11/05/92--
42498
1/05/92-
42498
$0.00 11/05/92
00022 42498
$0.00 11/05/92
00022 42498
$0.00 11/05/92--
11/01/92
1/05/92
00022
11/01/92 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
03790 160-400-310.2-4188 01334 $7.0.78
11/01/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
03790 160-400-8408-41.88 00043 $4.50
11/01/92 CIP 89-408 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
03790 705-400-1209-4188 00635 $18.75
11/01/92 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
03790 70.5-4.00-1217-4188 00707 $24.42
11/01/92 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
DAWN*WILLIAMS 04936 1.10-300-0000-3302
CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 03785 11/02/92
$0.00
00022
$0. 00
'8
19
21
23
74
25
zs
27
3z
42498 _
11/05/92 ^3,
3A
ai
.12
42498
11/05/92
00022 42498
$2,776.51
$0.00 11/05/92
00022 42498
$0.00 11/05/92
00022 42498
$0.00 11/05/92
4i
2.11
4848.8 $20.00
/COURT FINES/PARKING
*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************
*** PAY CODE TOTAL******************************************************************
*** TOTAL WARRANTS******************************************************************
5,)
3203785 05614 42499
$0.00 11/05/92 6
51
•
r
$20. 00 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED Y
THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGES / TO INCLUSIVtr,
WARRANT REGISTER FOR /1/5794TF
//
$134, 344. FUNDS IL ` - -- ARE ACCURA E,
UNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR P41.;,'• 'r.ItE' - -1-fc�NFNF
' CIZi•Apr,E
.0 THE IP ^.GET.
I
"-- FINANCE f'101 t. i UR
F:ArE 1/4 -A1 --
$164.366.666Y
/4 -
$164,366.666Y
I1
411.
November 2, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Hermosa Beach City Council of November 10, 1992
TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA trams
November 24, 1992
Approval of Management Resolution
Downtown maintenance agreements
Vehicle parking on public r -o -w
along Beach Drive
(Continued from 9/8/92 mtg.)
Discussion of Section 2-33 of the
HBMC regarding civil service
testing requirements
City Mgr./Personnel Dir.
Public Works Director
Public Works Director
Personnel Director
Discussion of R/UDAT recommendations City Manager
December 15, 1992
South School conceptual design Community Resources Dir.
Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report Finance Director
Project Touch lease renewal (Room C) Community Resources Dir.
January 12, 1993
Review of draft Land Use Element Planning Director
*****************************************************************
UPCOMING ITEMS NOT YET CALENDARED
Initiated by
Party Date
Staff Caltrans utility mainten-
ance agreement Public Works Dir.
Staff
Ordinance for new Chapter 19
of HBMC entitled "Motor
Vehicles and Traffic"
Council 5/8/90 Re. oil project CUP -
define "temporary" as it
relates to height of
Public Works Dir.
ic
Council 5/92
Council 6/6/91
Staff
Council 9/24/91
Council 5/26/92
Staff
WP/FUTRAGND
project (needs text
amendment)
Review of standard CUP
conditions
Review Bldg/Zoning Code
changes to improve
liveability
Adjustment of Park Tax
Effect of nonconforming
ordinance on damaged
structures
Revision of HBMC pro-
visions pertaining to
construction of public
street improvements
(public hearing)
Evaluation of Public
Information Program
Planning Dir.
Planning Dir.
Planning Dir.
Building Dir.
Planning Dir.
Public Works Dir.
Public Safety/(Parking
Enforcement/Animal
Control)
Request for approval of the
Tenant/Users Liability Insur-
ance Program (TULIP) and
establishment of an admin-
istrative fee for processing
TULIP applications Personnel Director
Honorable Mayor
and Members of the
City Council
November 4, 1992
City Council Meeting
of November 10, 1992
MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE
PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH
Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the
month of October 1992.
Respectfully submitted,
Gary L rutsch
City Treasurer
NOTED:
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager
1 d
Investment
INVESTMENT TOTAL
SEATTLE 1ST NATL.
BALANCE 9/01/92
BALANCE 9/30/92
$1,005,937.50 9/14/90 6/30/94 $1,005,937.50 $1,077,810 8.50%
$12,103,109.08
BANK TRUST
$ 527,819.81
$ 527,819.81
TICOR TITLE INSURANCE CO.
BALANCE 07/01/92
BALANCE 07/31/92
TRUSTEE TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
$ 11,921.08
11,921.08
$ 539,740.89
$12,642,930.97
Respectfully Submitted,
/. '.
Gary L. BrutsCh
City Treasurer
8.625%
7.5%
INSTITUTION
LAIF
BALANCE 10/1/92
TOTAL
INVESTMENT REPORT - OCTOBER 1992
DATE OF DATE OF ASKING MARKET
INVESTMENT MATURITY PRICE VALUE INTEREST
BALANCE 10/31/92
$8,595,633.15
$8,595,633.15
LACPIF
Railroad Right -of -Way Account
BALANCE 10/01/92 $ 1,064,744.43
BALANCE 10/31/92
4.97%
1,064,744.43 4.46%
MERRILL LYNCH
CORPORATE NOTES:
Ford Motor Credit Co.
Investment $ 500,000.00 5/19/88 5/20/93 $ 500,000.00 $ 502,455 9.10%
U.S. TREASURY BOND:
Investment $ 996,875.00 5/14/90 2/15/93 $ 996,875.00 $1,022,190 8.49%
s
4
October 28, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Hermosa Beach City Council of November 10, 1992
RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD TOWING SERVICE AND STORAGE GARAGE BID FOR
THE POLICE DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council award the Towing Service and
Storage Garage bid to Frank Scotto Towing of Torrance, Calif.
BACKGROUND:
Our current Towing Contract is with American Towing of Redondo
Beach. We have had this contract with American since 1986.
American has been locked into their tow rates since that time.
We felt it was time to go out to open bid to see if a better
towing service could be found.
The selection of a towing service is not an expenditure but a
revenue_to the City. Since the City collects $38 for each
vehicle impounded, this brings in approximately $30,000 for the
fiscal year. -
ANALYSIS:
We went out to open bid during the month of September 1992. We
also advertised in the Easy Reader on September 3 and September
10, 1992. We sent out a total of 7 bid packages to towing
companies. On October 1, 1992 there were 6 bids submitted.
A copy of the bid proposal is attached. It was our intent in
recommending a towing contractor to not base our decision solely
on the submitted prices for towing services. (Page 11,
"Reservation" of the bid package) It is important that the city
have a towing agent that is honest, ethical, professional, and
has a good reputation in the community. The towing of vehicles
is a very sensitive action taken by law enforcement especially to
the citizen who gets their car towed. The last thing that the
City needs is a towing agent that has a reputation for rudeness,
theft, damaging vehicles, and overcharging. A towing agent
involved in this type of conduct not only taints the image of the
City but also opens the City to claims for damages and potential
lawsuits.
During the review process, it was determined that 4 of the 6
towing services that submitted bids did not meet the requirements
of the bid for one or more of the following reasons:
1. One or more of the documents required in the bid were not
submitted at the bid opening.
1
2. The Towing Service did not have the facilities required by the
bid. Specifically, they did not have the storage capacity to
handle the minimum number of cars required by the bid. (Page
19 of the bid package)
3. In conducting a background check it was determined that the
towing agency had a reputation for rudeness, theft, damaging
vehicles, and overcharging. The -references contacted advised
us not to consider them as a potential candidate for towing
services.
This left us with two towing agencies for consideration. The two
agencies are Frank Scotto Towing and Van Lingen Towing both of
Torrance, California. Both of these agencies more than exceeded
the requirements of the bid. Additionally, a background check
revealed that these two agencies have exceptional reputations in
the area.
Frank Scotto Towing has the towing contracts for Redondo Beach
Police Department, Lomita Sheriffs, and provides heavy duty
towing services to the Carson Sheriffs station. Scotto is also
on the rotational contract with the Torrance office of the CHP.
Frank Scotto Towing is a AAA towing agent in good standing and
provides towing services to the Adkins Automotive Group which is
a corporation owning 9 car dealerships here in the South Bay
Area.
Van Lingen Towing has the towing contracts with Torrance and
Palos Verdes Police Department. They also handle the L.A. County
Marshall's Office at South Bay Court and are on the rotational
contract with the Torrance Office of the CHP.
Officials at all of the above agencies were contacted regarding
the performance and reputation of these two towing agencies.
Each agency had nothing but positive comments and high praise for
Frank Scotto and Van Lingen Towing. It has been very difficult
to choose between these two outstanding businesses in
recommending which one should represent the City of Hermosa Beach
as our towing agent.
However we recommend that we select Frank Scotto Towing as our
towing agent for the following reasons:
1. Frank Scotto has a fleet of 26 tow trucks while Van Lingen has
a fleet of 12 trucks. Scotto has up to 8 drivers working at
night and 16-26 drivers working during the day. There is little
chance of Scotto not being able to meet the additional demand for
towing service that our contract would bring. Van Lingen told us
that he would have to purchase more trucks and hire more drivers
to handle us while Scotto is ready now.
2. The Scotto tow yard has a capacity of 300+ cars with adjacent
land owned by Scotto available for expansion. The Van Lingen
yard can hold up to 200 vehicles.
2
3. Both Towing Agencies quoted a rate of $65.00 for tows up to 1
ton. (This is an hourly rate for both agencies and includes any
on site labor charges such as lock outs, linkage disconnects,
dollies, etc.) However, Van Lingen quoted a rate of $127 over 1
ton while Scotto quoted a price of $100. Additionally, the
normal operating hours for Van Lingen are 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM each
day. In order for a person to get their car out of impound after
these hours, they would have to pay arr-additional $32.50 night
fee. However, Scotto's normal operating hours are from 7:00 AM
to 7:00 PM each day. Thereafter a person would have to pay a
night fee of $32.50.
4. The driving distance from City Hall to Van Lingen Towing is
about 4 miles while it is 8 miles to Frank Scotto. Though this
is a point in favor of Van Lingen, we do not feel that this
should be a deciding factor. In our discussions with Redondo
Beach PD and Lomita Sheriffs, we asked them if they received a
lot of complaints about the distance from their facilities to
Frank Scotto. They reported that they did not feel that it was a
problem and did not receive many complaints. We asked the same
question of Palos Verdes PD who is serviced by Van Lingen. The
Palos Verdes station is some distance from the Van Lingen yard as
well. They did not report any problems or complaints of
significance about the distance. These distances should not be
considered a major factor in making this decision. It should
also be noted that the distances involved here would not -affect
the response time for either towing company as each of them would
station trucks down in Hermosa Beach to handle our calls for
service.
5. One additional feature of Frank Scotto towing is that each of
their trucks is equipped with the "Teletrac" system. They know
exactly where each of their trucks are at any given time. This
assists them in assigning -trucks to calls and directing them into
hard to find locations.
Respectfully Submitted,
el Lavin
Division
Noted for Fiscal Impact
Viki Copeland
Finance Administrator
3
Concur:
Steve Wisniewski
Director of Public Safety
Frederick R. Perrin
City Manager
BID OPENING
PRGIFC;T NO.
BID OPENING LOG SHEET
Pa�.I CE D E.pAkrm E Air ,)EH!CLLS,
TouIG �STo R AGE o = PAGE 0&j
BIDDERS NAME
BID BOND AMOUNT OF BID
o
191J LOGE/J-7;7)/ktI ) 000 �-- C_/iE ' Cii C K
RATES 4 CHAR GEs : -row! MG
A. oft
N IGHr—
o6
e)o('- /2rt°6
�) 0/C D) 14C E)
RRTE.3 4 cHAR6 Es : STofm4 E
a .06 3. 1(.(D°
NICHT —
OG
tic
2) — AMER IC -A-11107,614-
A
RATES cri
OUO,°° Cs#/IER C;IEcR
3.5-1°° of ��
R ATE CHAR Es : sTo R.4G E
, � �� 1 a
.QT) 3) 15- 00
9
•.v�2 7
2
1
Cr. Crry cleft
"snrmu-
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
1315 Vailey Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
810 OPENING LOG SHEET
BID OPENING �bj.l CE DEpAkrMEr t ( r
PROJECT NO. TOct)lkiG 4 STORAGE of VEHReic.LTcoCo
BIDDERS NAME
BID BOND AMOUNT OF BID
ft.fr11 .-j-;3I IJG
RArE5 4CHARGEs
A)Dog -
35.
I� Q00 ° d C»sn IER Cfri Eck
-r-owl *1G
00
NIGNr— 3S-
00
70• -
0
c) 95 = D) 25-°° E�
RATE -5 4 CHAR6 ES : STORRG E
oa o0
5 . --- 2) — 3 )
F)
(26 o0
- 3. Et u).[0 ( -6(13G- w 13G I, 000.°°
RATES 4 CN410Es : Tpt,43 FUG
A 59.°= 1��GHr-
ony - i 30
00
C4514 EEC((
or)
1k) IGNT -
30.00
59 = o. �S°° E .2o oa
AT€Z 4 CHAR ES : STO
SO £ 12. °o
00
oma,
3.> Ig
� L T O 17992
city Clerk `)
City of Msrrn,ss Basch ,\
of
4625, C4p
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
I 1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beech, CA 90254
?AGE2 OF 3
BID OPENING LOG SHEET
BID OPENING P�s1 CE D E.pmri E i %
PROJECT NO. -FOWL /tJG 4 STORA6E OF V E Hic-LE,S
BIDDERS NAME
BID BOND AMOUNT OF BID
,i4isHAik41,5 low,A)6 - 41, 000.°D CAsoiER C./Lc<
RATE5 4 CHAR6Es : -rows k1G
A. oft °° tJIGNr—
e) o� j - aoo . �-
&I ICHT -
Mfg.°°
RATES 4 cHARG ES : STORHG E
13 00 00
14C -
F. aLt.°°
��n1K SCO -7) /oJJiAJ - I j 000.95- C.fisN 'Lk CNECK
R-Fin7S--4 CNARGE5. Too.)I
Q.1219 - dos- p°
�11GNr-
s0D
C) Cod • ° x p. �S. o° E.
iZ ATE 4 CM A ROES : STO R.fJr6 E
q0
.° .2) '.°°
r
0
eo-TTI
'' Via}
OO.�
ahc"':
_....mss• B.0.2'
�a,c�rcc�
a (cecs, c;
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
I 1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS FOR TOWING SERVICE AND STORAGE GARAGE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Hermosa Beach,
California, is soliciting sealed proposals for Towing Service
Storage Garage.
and
The proposals must be received by Thursday October 1, 1992, no
later than 2:00 P.M. Sealed bids will be opened at 2:00 P.M. on
October 1, 1992. Please mail or deliver your proposal to:
Office of the City Clerk
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, Calif. 90254
Your proposal must be received in a sealed envelope marked
outside front of the envelope "Sealed Bid - Proposal for
Furnishing Towing Service and Storage Garage."
on the
The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals. The
City's decision, as with all professional service contracts, will
be made upon a variety of performance and other cost factors.
For complete proposal packages detailing specifications and
conditions, contact the Hermosa Beach Police Department,
Commander Michael Lavin, at 310-318-0360.
Hermosa Beach Police Department
City of Hermosa Beach
Run Legal: September 03, 1992
September 10, 1992
CtryOF
HERMOSA BEACH
NOTICE
INVITING PROPOSALS FOR .�
TOWING SERVICE ANO •
STORAGE GARAGE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
the Cilly of Hen noes Beath. Califor-
nia. m soliciting sealed proposals for
Towing > rrege Garage.
The ls must be received
by Thursday. October 1. 1992. no
later Iran 2:00 P.M. Sealed bids will
be opened at that time in the City
Council Chamber. Please mail or
deitver your proposal to:
Office of the City Clerk
City Fall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach. Calf. 90204
Your proposal must be recorded
in a sealed envelope marked an the
outside kora of Vie envelope 'Seated
Bid - Proposal for Furnishing Towng
Servs and Storage Garage.'
The City reserves the nght to re -
teat aiy or all pnoposa e. The Citya
decision. as melt all profession ear -
vice contracts. will be made upon a
vanapaf performatoeadereroosi
laden.
Forepaw:V leproposalrestage►
deleting specifications and condi-
tions,
ont`tiers contact the Hennas Bend
Panda OepartmenL Co.mmamdeir
Arataeelfaun, at 310-318-0SW
Hamtbm Beach Polio, Oefralmt/m
CNV el Ffaatbsa emit -
. ER 11442.9-10492 400.46N
Easy Reader/Redondo Beach News. Se , L,er 3, 1992
HERMOSA SEAOM- •
NOTICE
INVITING PROPOSALS Palle. -
TOWING SERVICE AND
STORAGE GARAGE
. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVERS d
OS City of Hermosa Beath. Cetra
j..nproposal/Apr
sealedealedproposal/AprleNlttg Service and Storage Gstafl.-
Tlne proposals must be arcaded
W4Thuraday. October 1. 1911Aam e
Mier than 2:00 P.M. Sealed bidsalk-
Sj opened at that tame vi Mr
Council Chamber. Please mat er
dater your Proposal to: • • T r?
Office of the City Clerk --
City Hall
1315 Valley Dnve
Hermosa Beach. CaM. 99204
Your Proposal mart be wasilnd
in a sealed envelope marlisilthilher
outside hoot of the srvetope'6mtemb
Bid - Proposal for Fumsami Toad.
Service and Storage Garage-.
The City nraves ,e.ngt1 MOW
Mae any al all ProPomilec.TIWIWorj
decision. as wmh se proleseiartiMM.
viae COMM& mill le iv upsa
meaty el performenceandemtnme,
tafvFFarr ocimPtale properdetaing O4eigma.
ilions and comes
Dorm GO,-- I410110116 Bade
Palos Vegdilinent. •Carne der
Hamm* Basalt Police p-alrmarF
City of Hansell Beads
,,r u••
�tjiyatfaaaerist�,
Pith.97 um R8 fiaaa 1
1 — ital,Yardklir"
Bid No.
Date:
TO:
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INVITES YOUR QUOTATION FOR THE
FOLLOWING:
TOWING SERVICE AND STORAGE GARAGE
BIDDER PLEASE TAKE NOTE:
All bids must be submitted to the Office of the City Clerk sealed
and clearly marked on the outside front of the bid envelope:
"SEALED BID - PROPOSAL FOR FURNISHING TOWING
SERVICE AND STORAGE GARAGE"
Bids must be received before 2:00 P.M. October 1, 1992.
READ AND UNDERSTAND ALL BID INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION, ALL
EXHIBITS, AND ATTACHMENTS. THEY FORM AN INTEGRAL PART OF THIS
BID AND SUBSEQUENT CONTRACT TO BE AWARDED BY CITY COUNCIL, CITY
OF HERMOSA BEACH.
Information called for in this proposal that is not submitted
shall be cause for rejection.
Direct all inquiries to Commander Michael Lavin, 318-0303.
FREDERICK FERRIN, CITY MANAGER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
EXHIBIT
OF BID #
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
NOTICE TO BIDDERS
BID INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION - SERVICES
NOTICE TO BIDDERS: Notice is hereby given, that sealed proposals
will be received in the Office of the City Clerk, City Hall, 1315
Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California until 2:00 P.M. October
1, 1992 and will be opened at that time.
All bids must be submitted sealed and clearly marked on the out-
side front of the bid envelope:
"SEALED BID - PROPOSAL FOR FURNISHING TOWING SERVICE
AND STORAGE GARAGE"
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS: DEFINITIONS - The following meanings are
attached to the following defined words when used in these
specifications and the contract: The word "City" means the City
of Hermosa Beach, California. The word "Bidder", "Vendor", or
"Supplier" means the person, firm or corporation submitting a bid
on these specifications or any part thereof.
1. Filing Date: All bids must be filed at or before time indi-
cated herein, on forms furnished. Copies of all forms,
specifications and exhibits are available from the Purchasing
Agent.
2. Reservation: The City Council of said City reserves the right
to reject any and all bids received, to take all bids under
advisement for not to exceed thirty (30) days after date of
opening thereof, to waive any informality on any bid, and to
be sole judge of the relative merits of the material men-
tioned in the respective bids received. Price will not be
the sole consideration in awarding this bid. A background
check will be conducted on perspective bidders that may in-
clude but will not be limited to; local police department
check; references; survey of past/current customers; profes-
sional reputation in local community. The City Council also
reserves the right to reject any item or items therein, to
award one or more contracts on the bids submitted either by
combined award of all items complete to one bidder or by
award of separate items or groups of items to various bid-
ders. The right is reserved to reject any bid not accompa-
nied with all data or information required. Bidders are
hereby notified that the successful bidder must be properly
licensed to do business in the City of Hermosa Beach before
commencing the work under the contract awarded hereunder, if
required by the contract.
3. Affidavit: An affidavit form is enclosed which must be com-
pleted signifying that such proposal is genuine and not col-
lusive or made in the interest or in behalf of any person not
herein named, and that the bidder has not directly or indi-
rectly induced or solicited any other person, firm or cor-
poration to refrain from bidding, and that the bidder has not
in any manner sought by collusion to secure for himself an
advantage over any other bidder.
Any bid made without such affidavit or in violation thereof,
shall not be considered. In all instances, the affidavit
form contained herein is to be signed by the bidder before a
notary public.
4. Bid Form: The proposal must be made on the form provided for
that purpose, enclosed in provided sealed envelope, and
marked "proposal for (material, supplies, equipment or ser-
vices, called for in this schedule)" showing the schedule
number appearing on cover sheet, and addressed to City Clerk,
City Hall, Hermosa Beach, California 90254. If the bid is
made by an individual, it must be signed by the full name of
the bidder, whose address must be given; and if it is made by
a corporation, it must be signed by the proper officer in the
corporate name, and the corporate seal must be attached to
such signature. No telegraphic or telephonic proposal will
be considered.
Blank spaces in the proposal must be properly filled in,
using ink, indelible pencil, or typewriter, and the phraseol-
ogy of the proposal must not be changed. Where called for in
the specification, bidders will provide item by item compari-
sons of item specifications required, versus specifications
proposed and bid herein. Alterations by erasure or inter -
lineation must be explained or noted in the proposal over the
signature of the bidder. Bidders are invited to be present
at the opening of proposals.
5. The Contract: The bidder to whom the award is made will be
required to enter into a written contract with the City of
Hermosa Beach. Said contract may be a Purchase Order. A
copy of the notice inviting bids, or the proposals and these
will be attached to, and form a part of, the contract. All
materials, supplies, equipment and services, supplied by the
Vendor shall conform to the applicable requirements of the
City Ordinances, as well as conforming to the specifications
contained herein. In case of default by the Vendor, the City
reserves the right to procure the articles or services from
other sources and to hold the Vendor responsible for an ex-
cess cost incurred by the City thereby.
6. Errors and Omissions: The Vendor shall not be allowed to
take advantage of any errors and/or omissions in these
specifications submitted with his proposal. Full instruc-
tions will always be given when such errors or omissions are
discovered, and Vendor agrees to abide by said instructions.
7. Bid Bond: Each bid shall be accompanied by a certified
check, cash, or bid bond payable to the order of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California, in the amount of One Thousand
($1,000) Dollars. The check, cash, or bond deposit of the
successful bidder shall be forfeited to said City if such
Bidder fails or refuses to enter into the necessary contract
within fourteen (14) days after written notice of contract,
and thereafter perform in accordance with the accepted bid
roposal. If, however, the successful Bidder tenders a cer-
tified check, the bond form may be disregarded. The bond
form attached is to be signed by the surety or sureties be-
fore a Notary Public or in lieu thereof, the form of the
Surety Company may be used. The successful bidder should use
particular care in seeing that the bond or certified check is
in the full amount as specified.
8. Force Majeure Clause: The Vendor will be excused from the
performance of the contract, in whole or in part, only by
reason of the following causes:
a. When such performance is prevented by operation of law.
b. When such performance is prevented by an irresistible
superhuman cause.
c. When such performance is prevented by an act of public
enemies of the State of California, or of the United
States of America, or by strike, mob violence, fire,
delay in transportation beyond the control of the Ven-
dor, or unavoidable casualty.
d. When such performance is prevented by the inability of
the Vendor to secure necessary materials, supplies, or
equipment by reason of:
1. Appropriation or use thereof by the Federal
Government, or
2. Regulations imposed by the Federal Government.
No other Force Majeure Clause or conditions may be inserted
in this bid and any changes in the conditions stated herein
will cause the bid to be rejected.
9. Default:
a. If the vendor fails in any manner fully to perform and
carry out each and all of the terms, covenants, and con-
ditions of the awarded contract, he shall be in default
and notice in writing shall be given him of such default
by the City Manager of the City. If the Vendor fails to
cure such default within such time as may be required by
such notice, the City may at its option terminate and
cancel the contract, and at the expense of the Vendor
and his or its surety, complete the contract, or cause
the same to be completed.
- 13 -
b. The waiver of a breach of any term, covenant, or condi-
tion hereof shall not operate as a waiver of any subse-
quent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or
condition hereof.
10. Liability:
The Vendor must procure liability insurance in an appropriate
amount to cover any claims arising out of any service, prod-
uct, evaluation, statement, declaration, conditions provided
by or under the control of, the vendor, the amount of such
assurance shall be a stipulation of the contract, and set by
the City.
EXHIBIT
OF BID NO.
SPECIFICATION
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
TOWING SERVICE AND STORAGE GARAGE
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
The following specifications are furnished to establish the re-
quirements to be met in order to qualify to bid on the Towing
Service and Storage Garage Contract for the City of Hermosa
Beach.
III. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
The term "Bid" in this proposal shall be the dollar amount
charged for specified services.
A. Bidder shall provide a complete financial statement con-
sisting of a balance sheet and a profit and loss state-
ment for the preceding year. Such information shall be
attested to by a Public Accountant or a Certified Public
Accountant. City shall reserve the right to audit, if
it so desires, the records of the company. As indicated
under Section H, additional audits shall be made during
the life of this contract. Bidders failing to provide
information as required herein shall be considered non-
responsive and bids shall be rejected.
B. The Tow Service and Storage Garage operator and his em-
ployees shall be fingerprinted at the Hermosa Beach
Police Department within thirty (30) days after the
agreement is executed; all persons who subsequently be-
come officers or employees of said Tow Service and
Storage Garage operator shall be fingerprinted and
photographed prior to such appointment or employment.
C. The right of any vehicle owner involved in a traffic
collision to call for tow service of his own choosing
shall not be infringed upon so long as the removal of
the vehicle can be made without undue delay; in those
cases where the owner of a damaged or abandoned vehicle
chooses to have the City's Tow Service and Storage
Garage contractor transport such vehicle, this shall be
a private matter to be arranged between the owner of the
vehicle and the contractor.
In no case shall Contractor use coercion or pressure of
any kind upon the owner or driver of a vehicle removed
under this agreement. If towed to Contractor's own
storage yard or garage, Contractor shall not coerce,
- 15 -
unduly influence, or mislead the owner to have needed
repairs performed by the Contractor. Contractor shall
inform the owner that repairs may be performed at the
garage of his choice, and shall not waive or rebate
towing or storage charges as an inducement to the owner
to select Contractor's garage.
D. The owner of a vehicle ordered to be impounded who ap-
pears on the scene after the Tow Service contractor has
been called and requests immediate release of his vehi-
cle, upon obtaining a Vehicle Release Order from the
Police Department may secure his vehicle by paying a
stipulated service charge to the Tow Service contractor.
This clause shall go into effect when the tow service
takes custody of the vehicle, either by signature af-
fixed to the filled out CHP Form 180, or when the tow
service equipment is attached to the vehicle. In the
event these conditions have not been met, the Police
Department will attempt to cancel the call in as timely
a manner as possible, but, in no case shall the Police
Department or city be held financially responsible for
such a "dry run."
E. The Tow Service and Storage Garage operator upon signing
CHP Form 180, (Report of Impounded Vehicle) assumes full
responsibility for the vehicle and contents on each
impound.
F. Contractor shall abide by all State and local ordinances
pertaining to the contract service and shall make all
reports required by the Vehicle Code of the State of
California. Contractor shall follow all reasonable
rules or regulations which the Purchasing Division and
the Police Department of the City may from time to time
prescribe governing the conduct of said operation.
G. Term of Contract:
The contract shall be for a term of three (3) years from
the time the contract goes into effect with an annual
calendar year review by the Chief of Police. However,
the City will reserve the right to terminate the con-
tract awarded hereunder, and any amendment thereto, in
the event the contractor hereunder does not fully comply
with all of the terms of said contract, and any amend-
ment thereto, and of these specifications, upon the
giving of thirty (30) days written notice to such
contractor.
H. Maintenance of Facilities
Throughout the term of this Agreement, the Garage Owner
shall maintain in a neat and clean manner and in good
condition, the real property and improvements thereon
and all vehicles, facilities, equipment and materials
required by the provisions of these specifications.
I. Inspection
The City reserves the right to inspect the facilities,
records, equipment and premises of the contractor -
hereunder at any time during the life of this contract
in order to insure that all the terms and conditions of
these specifications are being satisfactorily met and
complied with.
J. Ordinances, Permits and Licenses:
The contractor shall at all times comply with existing
ordinances of the City of Hermosa Beach and such other
ordinances as the City Council of said City may enact
governing this operation, and shall conform to Federal,
State and local laws now in effect or hereafter enacted,
and shall obtain and maintain at his own cost and ex-
pense, all necessary licenses and permits.
K. The contractor shall provide a single telephone number,
through which all contract services will be available.
L. Except as provided herein, the Garage Owner shall not
display or use any signs, advertising material or logos
which indicate that he is an official towing service of
police garage of the City without having received the
prior written permission of the Director of Public
Safety.
II. SERVICE REQUIREMENTS:
A. Must operate on a 24-hour, 365 -day per year basis to
provide emergency or routine towing service in response
to Police Department request for service. Such response
must be as timely as possible, but in no case in excess
of (30 minutes). If the operator of the tow equipment
cannot, or is otherwise occupied, comply with the (30
minutes) requirement, the operator must cause a second,
third, or fourth truck to be dispatched. The City
reserves the right to call any tow service available if
the contract tow service is unable to comply with this
section.
In addition, it shall be the duty of the Garage Owner to
provide emergency service for City vehicles within 50
miles of City limits at no charge to the City at all
times including weekends and holidays. Emergency ser-
vices shall include but not be limited to tire changes,
battery jump-starts and towing of inoperable vehicles.
Garage Owner shall perform the duties of this agreement
in a professional, ethical, courteous and orderly manner
as a best effort to keep the confidence of the
community.
B. Response Time:
- 17 -
1. The Garage Owner shall notify the Police Communica-
tions Section when a tow unit cannot respond immedi-
ately, and shall give the reason and an estimated
time of arrival.
2. In the event of an additional delay, the Garage Owner
shall promptly notify the Police Communications Sec-
tion and give the next estimated time of arrival.
3. In the event the Garage Owner received an additional
call to remove a disable vehicle that is interrupting
traffic flow while he is processing an earlier call,
he shall clear the vehicle specified in the earliest
call sufficiently to restore normal and safe traffic
movement; secure it from theft, damage or loss; and
immediately proceed to the site specified in the ad-
ditional call; or shall cause a second tow truck to
be dispatched to the second site.
4. All disabled vehicles deposited or parked by the
Garage Owner shall be towed to storage at the earli-
est opportunity after Garage Owner has complied with
the above provisions for restoring traffic movements
at all specified sites.
C. Must provide 24-hour, 365 -day per year vehicle release
service. Release to be upon written notice from the
Police Department.
D. Must be equipped and proficient in unlocking locked
vehicles on Police order when required.
E. All bills must be itemized.
F. Must furnish to vehicle owners a preprinted schedule of
authorized rates and charges as approved by the City
Manager.
G. All tow rates will be conspicuously posted in the tow
garage.
H. When, in the opinion of the Police, unusual or emergency
circumstances warrant the release of an impounded vehi-
cle or items from an impounded vehicle between the hours
of 6 P.M. and 8 A.M., the Garage Owner shall provide
personnel for such emergency release or releases at no
additional cost.
I. Due to the need for tow operators to communicate clearly
with City staff and the public, all tow operators must
be fluent in the English language.
J. Garage Owner shall accept major credit cards (22651.1
Vehicle Code).
III. TOW CAR REQUIREMENTS:
A. Must comply with the tow car requirements of the Cal-
ifornia Vehicle Code.
B. Must have adequate equipment to handle any passenger
vehicle small trucks, large trucks, trailers, tractors
or similar heavy equipment, i.e., standard tow truck --
not converted pickup or light truck. A 3 -axle tow vehi-
cle specifically designed for heavy duty towing must be
available for 30 minute response and trained personnel
to operate said vehicle. Garage owner should have flat-
bed tow truck available for 24 hour response if needed.
This provision may be contracted by the Tow Service, who
then assumes all liability thus incurred.
C. Must have a cable winch of sufficient size and capacity
to retrieve vehicles which have rolled over or have gone
over embankments of off traveled portions of roadways
into inundated areas or other inaccessible locations.
D. Must have a minimum of three (3) tow trucks available at
all times and sufficient amount of equipment to provide
expeditious movement of disabled vehicles involved in
multi -vehicular collisions.
E. Tow car vehicles must be equipped with private two-way
radio equipment for communicating with garage operator.
Contractor will not use City's Police frequency. Con-
tractor will be responsible for obtaining F.C.C. approv-
al for commercial operator.
IV. STORAGE REQUIREMENTS:
A. Storage facilities for storage up to 10 days must be
provided within an eight (8) mile radius of the Civic
Center of Hermosa Beach to accommodate fifty (50) vehi-
cles, four (4) of which spaces must be under roof in a
building capable of being secured wherein vehicles
requiring special handling for investigation, i.e., fin-
gerprinting, photographing, searching, etc., can be
stored, and such vehicles shall not be moved or touched
after storage therein without the consent of the Police
Department.
B. Storage facilities for long term impounds involving
wrecked and abandoned vehicles must be provided to ac-
commodate the storage of at least fifty (50) vehicles
within 10 miles of the Civic Center of Hermosa Beach.
C. Storage lots or yards must be properly fenced with a
suitable material and at least six (6) feet in height.
Lots must be equipped so as to provide adequate lighting
during the hours of darkness and further should be pro-
vided with ample facilities for locking or otherwise
securing the same. Lot should be so located' as to be
under constant surveillance of the operator or an atten-
dant, or at least in an area subject to police patrol.
- 19 -
Sufficient space is required to segregate hazardous
vehicles, i.e., (leaking gas tanks, etc.)
D. When it is necessary to remove vehicles to other storage
facilities to make space available for current impounds,
permission shall be first obtained from the Police
Department. A written notification of the new location
for storage of such vehicles shall be made to the Police
Department within 24 hours subsequent to such removal.
E. At the time of bidding, bidder must submit a statement
certifying that he is able to comply with the specifica-
tions; further, that he either owns or has a lease on
the real property to be used for the equipment and
storage yard; if such property is being leased, the bid-
der must state from whom he is leasing and the unexpired
term of said lease.
V. ADMINISTRATION AND OPERATION:
A. The Tow Service and Storage Garage operator will main-
tain records of all impounded vehicles, ordered by the
Police Department, at his place of business and such
records shall be available to members of the Police
Department and to any person specifically authorized in
writing by the City Manager. Said records shall be sub-
ject to monthly audit.
1. Records shall include but not be limited to:
a. CHP Form 180, Report of Impounded Vehicle,
complete on both sides of form.
b. CHP Form 126, Report of Notification of Impound.
c. Copies of registered letters to vehicle owners.
d. Charge sheets listing tow charges and storage
fees against each individual vehicle and, when
possible, containing the owner's release (sig-
nature).
e. Ledger account shall be maintained by date
sequence showing date of impound, amount of each
charge as a separate entry, and total of all
charges. Such entries shall be supported by the
documents called for in a.,through d. above.
2. The records listed above will be maintained in jacket
files by month, by chronological date of impound or
storage. Such records shall be placed in storage and
maintained as required by law and will be made avail-
able as indicated in V.A. above.
3. The record system should be adequate to enable Garage
Owner to locate and/or provide a written report of
storage or tow by:
1. Vehicle from DR number only.
2. Vehicle from license number only.
3. Vehicle from the make, color, date and location
of impound.
4. All records required to be kept by the Garage Owner
shall be available for inspection at all reasonable
times by representatives of the Hermosa Beach Police
Department, California Highway Patrol, DMV, or any
other law enforcement agency.
B. The tow service and storage garage operator shall pre-
pare and deliver to the Police Department all ap-
praisals, certificates, statements, notices, declara-
tions, registered mail receipts, releases, or such other
documents as required by Vehicle Code Section 22705 or
any other section of the code which applies to the
towing -storage of vehicles shall be the responsibility
of the tow truck company operator.
VI. INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS:
The Tow Service and Storage Garage operator shall indemnify
and save harmless the City of Hermosa Beach, the City Coun-
cil, and any other officer,employee, agent or appointee of
the City of Hermosa Beach from any suits, claims or actions
brought by any person or persons for or on account of any
injuries or damages sustained or arising in the carrying
out of this towing service and storage garage contract, or
in consequence thereof.
A. Coincident with the execution of any contract hereunder,
contractor will procure a policy of liability insurance
in company listed in Best Insurance Guide with a rating
of A+, authorized to do business in the State of Cal-
ifornia, protecting the City of Hermosa Beach, its of-
ficers and employees, against any and all liability for
death, injury, loss or loss or damage to person or con-
tractor's operations under any contract that may be let
pursuant to these specifications provided that nothing
herein contained shall be considered as requiring the
exclusion of contractor as an additional assured in the
policy herein required. Such policy of insurance shall
contain not less than the following limits of liability:
Combined single limit of liability of $1,000,000
coverage against any injury, death, loss or damage as a
result of wrongful or negligent acts or omissions by the
contractor.
Contractor shall, coincidentally with the execution of
the contract, deliver said policy of insurance, or a
certified or photostatic copy thereof, to the City At-
torney for approval by him as to form and sufficiency,
and the contract shall not be effective, for any purpose
until such insurance policy is so delivered and so ap-
proved. When such policy has been so approved, it shall
be filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City
with the construction or service contract endorsement
form which shall be completed by the contractor's in-
surance carrier. In lieu of filing said insurance poli-
cy with the City, the same will be returned to contrac-
tor, after approval as to sufficiency and as to form as
above provided, if the contractor shall file with the
City a contractor's insurance certificate, executed by
the insurance carrier, certifying that the aforesaid
insurance is in full force and effect and that all
operations of the assured under the contract entered
into pursuant to these specifications, are covered
thereby. The City's form of construction or service
contract endorsement shall be completed and filed with
the policies or certificates of insurance. Contractor
shall pay, at his own expense, all premiums upon said
policy and shall maintain the same in full force and
effect during the life of the contract. The procuring
of such policy of insurance shall not be construed as a
limitation of contractor's liability or as a full per-
formance on contractor's part of the indemnification
provisions of the contract; contractor's liability
being, notwithstanding said policy of insurance, for the
full and total amount of any damage injury or loss cau-
sed by or incident to the contractor's operations under
the contract.
The completed construction or service contract endorse-
ment form shall be filed with any such contractor's in-
surance certificate.
B. The Tow Service and Storage Garage operator shall agree
to at all times keep fully insured at his own expense,
all persons employed by him in connection with this con-
tract as required by the Workmen's Compensation In-
surance and Safety Act of the State of California, and
shall hold the City free and harmless from all liability
that may arise by reason of the injuries to any em-
ployees of the contractor who are injured while perform-
ing any work or labor necessary to carry out the provi-
sions of this contract.
VII. CHARGES:
A. Storage charges shall not exceed the rates approved
by the Hermosa Beach City Council. The word "day"
means a twenty-four (24) period beginning at the time
entered under "Time Towed" on the CHP 180 Form.
There shall be no storage charge for any vehicle
which is released within the first twenty four (24)
hour period.
Approved storage charges shall be made for the fol-
lowing categories:
1. Passenger Cars.
2. Trucks and Trailers to and including one ton.
3. Motorcycles.
4. Trucks and Trailers over one ton.
5. All other vehicles.
B. Miscellaneous Charges:
Miscellaneous charges shall not exceed the fees es-
tablished by the Hermosa Beach City Council for the
following services:
1. Opening locked vehicles.
2. Using tow dolly in towing work.
3. Disconnecting and reconnecting driveshaft.
4. Uprighting overturned vehicle.
5. Motorcycle trailer.
C. Towing Charges:
1. The towing charge for each tow truck per call
shall be as determined by the Hermosa Beach City
Council.
2. The towing charge shall include the services of
the driver of the tow truck and any other
required personnel.
3. The towing charge shall include cleaning up and
clearing of the accident site.
D. Maximum Charges:
1. Charges for towing, storage, and other services
required of the Garage Owner by these specifi-
cations shall not exceed those established by the
Hermosa Beach City Council.
2. All rates and charges shall be conspicuously
posted in the office or other area viewable by
the public and all customer bills shall be
itemized.
- 23 -
3. The charges shall apply on Saturdays, Sundays,
and holidays.
E. City Not Obligated:
1. The City shall not be liable to pay Garage Owner
or anyone else, any charge or other fee for a
call which does not result in a chargeable ser-
vice being rendered by Garage Owner (a "dry
run") .
F. Disputes:
1. In the event that any dispute shall arise con-
cerning any such charge made to any person in
performing services under this Agreement by the
Garage Owner, the dispute shall be decided by
the Chief of Police or his authorized represent-
ative, pursuant to California Vehicle Code
Section 22852.
2. Garage Owner shall not make any demand on the
vehicle owner or driver for a sum in excess of
the amount so determined by this specification
except those charges for services duly author-
ized in writing by the owner of the vehicle.
3. This decision shall be binding on all parties
involved.
G. Recovery of Costs Reasonably Borne:
Pursuant to Section 2-112 of the Municipal Code, ti-
tled "Public Safety Services," to recover police
costs reasonable borne,bidder shall agree to collect
said charges in the prescribed amount(s). Bidder
further agrees to remit, before the fifth (5th) day
of each calendar month, monies collected during the
preceding month pursuant to said Ordinance. Payment
shall be by check and shall be accompanied by a
statement indicating the number of police, private
impounds, and traffic accident towing used to compute
the total fees remitted.
VIII. NOTICE OF TERMINATION:
A. Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to
serve notice on the other respecting this Agreement,
such notice shall be served by registered mail or
personal delivery as follows:
To City:
City Clerk
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
To Contractor:
B. Different addresses may be furnished in writing by
either party to the other,_ and such notice shall be
deemed to have been served within seventy two (72)
hours after the same has been deposited in the United
States Post Office by registered mail. Said notice
may be personally delivered. This shall be a valid
and sufficient service of notice for all purposes.
C. Either party may cancel this Agreement upon serving
of 30 days written notice upon the other.
IX. INSOLVENCY:
A. The Garage Owner shall not suffer either the appoint-
ment of a receiver to take possession of all or sub-
stantially all of the assets of Garage Owner or make
a general assignment of such assets for the benefit
of creditors.
B. Any such action taken or suffered by Garage Owner
under any insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings con-
stitutes a breach of this contract by the Garage
Owner, and all property assigned by the City of Her-
mosa Beach for safe care shall be "released" to a new
assigned Garage Owner as specified by the City Man-
ager, with a reimbursement for towing and storage
borne by company assuming the new responsibility.
C. Should the Garage Owner become insolvent, as defined
in this section, the City Manager may, by giving five
(5) days notice to the Garage Owner or to the person
appointed to manage the Garage Owner's affairs at the
address for such person appearing in the official
records of the Court that appointed him, terminate
this Agreement. For the purposes of this section,
the Garage Owner shall conclusively presumed to have
become insolvent if Garage Owner should:
1. Have a Receiver appointed to take possession of
all or substantially all of the Garage Owner's
property because of insolvency;
2. Make general assignment for the benefit of credit-
ors; or
3. Allow any judgment against Garage Owner to remain
unsatisfied and unbonded for a period of thirty
(30) days or longer.
Bidder, if awarded a Service Agreement, shall comply
with certain provisions of the California Vehicle
Code and Civil Code setting forth legal requirements
relative to tow cars, tow car equipment, and impound-
ing procedures. The following Sections are current
examples, however, the State Legislature may enact
new provisions during the life of the awarded con-
tract. Bidder agrees to maintain a current and work-
ing knowledge of State requirements relative to tow
cars, tow car equipment, and impounding procedures,
during the life of this agreement.
Sections: Abbreviated Title
615 Tow Car Defined
4014 Portable Dolly Exempt
22513 Tow car parking on freeway when
not summoned for assistance.
24605(a) Tow Car, carry stop and tail lamp
with extension cord.
24605(b) Tow Car, display tail and stop
lamp on rear of disabled vehicle.
25253 Warning Lamps on Tow Cars.
25305(a,b) Use of flares.
27700(a,b,c) Required Equipment
27907 Tow Cars, not displaying identify-
ing name on both sides.
22523(a,b) Abandonment prohibited.
22524 Presumption of abandonment.
22651.1 Towing or Storage Charges: Payment
22669(a -j) Removal of Abandoned Vehicles.
22851.2 Disposition of low valued vehicles.
22850 Storage of Vehicle.
22851.4 Lien: Higher Value Vehicle.
22851.6 Lien: Low Value Vehicle.
22851.8 Notice by Lienholder: Low Value
Vehicle.
22851.10 Disposal of Vehicle to Dismantler
or Scrap Iron Processor.
22851.12 Lienholder Costs: Low Value
Vehicle.
22852 Notice to Owner.
22852.5 Loss of Possessory Lien.
22853 Notice to Department of Justice.
22854 Notice to Owner.
22855 Appraisers.
FRANK SCOTTO TOWING
1750 W. 223RD STREET
TORRANCE, CA. 90501
(310) 787-0208
INTRODUCTION
Frank Scotto Towing was established -in 1974. Eighteen years later
we have one of the most advanced and professional towing services
in California. Our facility was newly built in 1987. It has the
capacity to house 300+ cars, a fully -equipped repair garage with 3
lube bays (this is used only for company vehicles), as well as a
completely modern office with all the up-to-date equipment needed
to do the job required.
Our 26 tc•:: trucks were the first to be installed with the Tel -Trac
tracer system and we have 2 full-time mechanics on duty.
I take an active role in the gay -to -day operations of my business.
I am a to':: truck driver, a dispatcher, a mechanic, and the one who
oversees all facets of the business. I am available 24 hours a
day. I am currently on the Executive Board of the L.A. Chapter of
the California Tow Truck Association and have given many seminars
to help owners and drivers to be professional on their fob. I
consider myself and my drivers to be professionals in the business
of towing and will continue to try to elevate the job of towing
and vehicle recovery to a professional level.
FRANK SCOTTO TOWING
1750 W. 223RD STREET
TORRANCE, CA. 90501
(310) 787-0208
WORK EXPERIENCE
In 1974 Frank Scotto Towing began with 1
26 towing vehicles. In 1976 I began
Automobile Club of Southern California
tow truck. Today we have
my affiliation with the
and in over 16 years of
service we have helped over 2,500 AAA members, on the average, each
and every month. Frank Scotto Towing also has contracts with other
emergency roadside services including AMOCO Motor Club, Emergency
Road Service, Ford Motor Service, Cross Country Motor Club,
Montgomery Wards Emergency Road Service, American Road Service, and
the Cadillac Road Assistance. Since 1985 we have been the
exclusive contracted service for the City of Redondo Beach Police
Department and Los Angeles Sheriff's Department servicing the
cities of Lomita, Palos Verdes, and Rolling Hills Estates. we are
also on the rotation of the California Highway Patrol and we do the
heavy-duty towing for the Carson's Sheriff's Department. We
service almost every major new car dealership in the South Bay and
numerous other commercial accounts. Of the 22 drivers employed, 9
have over 5 years of service and another 6 have over 3 years of
service with our company. We are very proud of the fact that we
maintain a high-level of employee loyalty and longevity. All the
drivers at Frank Scotto Towing attend AAA training classes and many
have received additional training from the California Tow Truck
Association. With all the different types of towing that we do at
Frank Scotto Towing, we can boast that we have the best trained and
most diversified group of employees in the towing business.
All of our towing vehicles are fully equipped and regularly
serviced. They are also equipped with the Tel -Trac locating
system. In addition, we have 20 full-time mechanics who do all the
necessary repairs on all our vehicles.
The office staff consists of 7 full-time employees who provide all
the support services our drivers need. We are a 24-hour, 7 day -a -
week operation. I am on 24-hour call and can be reached virtually
anytime.
I have attended many classes about tow truck driving and have
trained over 300 drivers over the 18 years I have been in business.
I attended El Camino College and graduated with an AA degree in
Business Administration. I continued on to Long Beach State
College while employed with the Chevron Oil Company. I attended
many of their management schools which have proven to be beneficial
over the years.
FRANK SCOTTO TOWING
1750 W. 223rd STREET
TORRANCE, CA. 90501
EQUIPMENT
At Frank Scotto Towing we are proud to be the only towing service
in the South Bay which can truely say that we have a complete
line of towing equipment. (Please see photos attached.) With our
large trucks we can handle all or any truck that might breakdown.
We also have a 48 foot Landoll trailor which can handle all types
of cargo vehicles as well as other large vehicles. Our fleet
also includes more flat bed trucks than other towing services in
the area. -
Our fleet includes the following trucks:
1 large truck
1 medium duty truck
1 Landoll trailor
6 small flatbed trucks
17 standard tow trucks
26 total
Because we have such a diversified line of towing equipment, we are
the most capable towing company in the South Bay.
SHERMAN BLOCK, s.eRtrr
March 18, 1991
Tomlin- cif Ens Ai9rlifi
C®ffirr of ihr shrriff
Nall of JJusiur
Gan Angrlrs, (Qalifarnin 90012
Frank Scotto Tow
1750 W. 223rd Street
Torrance, California 90503
Dear Mr. Scotto:
It is my pleasure to recognize Frank Scotto Towing which
has provided contract towing to Lomita Sheriff's Station
for the past six years.
You have consistently provided exceptional service to the
community with an excellent arrival time on calls for
service.
Your fleet of twenty-four tow trucks are late model
vehicles that are well maintained and clean. Your
drivers are polite and have generated few complaints on
service and none regarding their honesty. We appreciate
the absence of reported losses from stored cars or damage
to them while in your care.
Sincerely,
RMAN BLOCK, SH
ennis C. Gillard, Captain
Commander, Lomita Station
DCG/cms
DEPARTMENT OF POLICE
ROGER M. MOULTON
CHIEF
To Whom It May Concern:
March 20, 1991
•
401 DIAMOND ST.
P.O. BOX 639
REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277-0639
TELEPHONE
(213) 379-2477
Frank Scotto Towing has served as the Official Police Tow of
the Redondo Beach Police Department since 1988.
My department has found the service provided by Scotto Towing to
be very professional. Most impressive is the fact that no thefts
or major complaints have been filed during our contract period.
My staff and I feel comfortable endorsing Frank Scotto Towing for
any public service contract he might seek.
If I can provide further information relative to this matter,
please feel free to contact me.
Yours for professional law enforcement,
'
RogeM. Moulton
Ch of Police
A D K I N 5
AUTOMOTIVE
11GRO U P�
20710 Hawthorne Boulevard • Torrance, California 90503 • 213/370-7401
October 20, 1992
Commander Michael Lavin
Hermosa Beach Police Department
540 Pier Avenue
Hermosa Beach, CA 90266
Dear Commander Lavin:
Our organization has been using Frank Scotto Towing for over
eighteen years. We have received no complaints and have been
very pleased with their job performance. We highly recommend
them to all our customers without hesitation.
Sincerel
Terry L. Charles
V'ce President/Operations Mgr.
TLC/cc
1 LARGE TRUCK
�' ./�^�
(jiff ' !
|
PROPOSAL FOR
TOWINGAND STORAGE OF VEHICLES
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
To the City Council of the
City of Hermosa Beach
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
The undersigned offers to perform all of the duties and obliga-
tions required of the Tow Service and Storage Garage Operator by
the provisions of the "Specifications for Towing Service and
Storage Garage, City of Hermosa Beach": dated 8-26-92 , at
the prices and for consideration herein provided and to tow vehi-
cles when so directed by the Police Department of the City of
Hermosa Beach at the following prices:
1. RATES AND CHARGES:
(A) Police -ordered impound tow charges for passenger type
vehicles and pick-up trucks up to 1 ton capacity during
the hours of daylight will be at the rate of
Sixty-five dollars ($ 65.00
(Words and Figures)
and during the hours of darkness at the rate of
Sixty-five dollars ($ 65.00
(Words and Figures)
(B) Police -ordered impound tow charges for trucks (1 ton and
over) heavy equipment during the hours of daylight will
be at the rate of
One Hundred dollars
(S 100.00
(Words and Figures)
and during the hours of darkness at the rate of
One hundred dollars ($ 100.00
(Words and Figures)
•
^-10W k
1641
of r«1muw 8s
(C) Where additional labor is required to facilitate the
movement of the vehicle, it may be charged at the rate
of:
Sixty-five dollars ($ 65.00/hcur )
(Words and Figures)
(D) Should the use of a dolly or motorcycle trailer be re-
quired, the use thereof may be charged at the rate of:
(E)
Sixty-five dollars ($ 65.00/hour )
(Words and Figures)
Where the tow truck has been ordered, arrives at the
scene and vehicle is released without towing services
being performed, the charge for the tow truck shall be:
NO CHARGE ($
(Words and Figures)
(F) The charge for a vehicle release during other than the
normal operating hours of 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. Mon-
day through Friday (Saturday and Sunday) (Insert operat-
ing hours) shall be a fee not to exceed for each service
rendered, the amount of:
Thirty-two dollars & fifty rents (S 32.50
(Words and Figures)
1. RATES AND CHARGES:
(B) Storage of vehicles shall be charged at the rate per day
of:
1. For Motorcycles $ 4.00 per day
2. For passenger cars and pick-up
trucks up to 1 ton capacity
$12.00 per day
3. For trucks and heavy equipment $18.00 per day
1 ton and over
4. Any part of one day will constitute one day's
storage.
2. LOCATION:
(A) Short-term storage yard facilities (Paragraph IVA. of
specifications) are located at:
1750 W. 223rd Street, Torrance
(B) Impound garage facility (Paragraph IVA. of specifica-
tions) is located at:
1750 W. 223rd street, Torrance
(C) Storage facilities for long-term impounds (Paragraph
IVB. of specifications) are located at:
1750 W. 223rd Street, Torrance
3. I (we) hereby certify that I (we) own/lease (check one) the
real property that will be used for:
(A) Short-term storage yard facilities X Own Lease
(B) Short-term garage facility X Own Lease
(C) Long-term storage yard facilities X Own Lease
\\i j X44 yam•'
P.0-11-0
4. If leasing the property mentioned in (3) above, please state
the following:
Name of Lessor: N/A
Address of Lessor:
Street
City State
Date of lease expiration: _ N/A
5. I hereby certify that I have read the Notice to Bidders and
the Specifications for Towing Service and Storage Garage,
City of Hermosa Beach, and I am able to comply with all re-
quirements as listed therein. The figures listed on these
proposal sheets constitute my bid for the furnishing of
towing service and storage garage facilities to the City of
Hermosa Beach for the period of three (3) years commencing
I ACKNOWLEDGE THE REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION AS
CALLED OUT HEREIN.
Frank Scotto Towing
NAME OF COMPANY
BY
Owner
1750 W. 223rd Street, Torrance
ADDRESS OF COMPANY
(310) 787-0208
PHONE NUMBER OF COMPANY
DATE OF THIS PROPOSAL
October 1, 1992
5
EXHIBIT
OF BID NO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) )
) SS. VENDOR'S AFFIDAVIT
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)
FRANK A. SCOTTO , being first duly
sworn, deposed and says:
1. That he is the sole proprietor of FRANK SCOTTO TOWING
(Insert: Title of office if a corporation,
"Sole Owner," "A Partner," or other proper title.)
herein called "vendor" who has submitted to the
City of Hermosa Beach a proposal for tftacxxxxxtm=rztrattxt2Eit
furnishing towing service and storage garage
2. That said proposal is genuine; that the same is not sham,
that all statements of fact therein are true;
3. That such proposal was not made in the interest or behalf of
any person, partnership, company, association, organization
or corporation not named or disclosed;
4. That the Vendor did not, directly or indirectly, induce,
solicit, or agree with anyone else to submit a false or sham
bid, to refrain from bidding, or to withdraw his bid, to
raise or fix the bid price of the Vendor or of anyone else,
or to rise or fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the
Vendor price or the price of anyone else; and did not attempt
to induce action prejudicial to the interest of the City of
Hermosa Beach or of any other bidder, or anyone else inter-
ested in the proposed contract;
5. That the Vendor has not in any manner sought by collusion to
secure for himself an advantage over any other bidder or to
induce action prejudicial to the interests of the City of
Hermosa Beach or of any other bidder or of anyone else inter-
ested in the proposed contract;
6. That the Vendor has not accepted any bid from any subcontrac-
tor or materialman through any bid depository, the bye-laws,
rules or regulations of which prohibit or prevent the Vendor
from considering any bid from any sub -contractor or material -
man, which is not proceeded through said bid depository, or
which prevent any subcontractor or materialman from bidding
to any vendor who does not use the facilities of or accept
bids from or through such bid depository;
7. That the Vendor did not, directly or indirectly submit the
Vendor's bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents
thereof, or divulge information or data relative thereto, to
any corporation, partnership, company, association, organiza-
tion, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof, or
individual or group of individuals, except to the City of
Hermosa Beach or to any person or persons who have a partner-
ship or other financial interest with said Vendor in his
business.
Dated this 29th day of Sept 1992
SEAL
•
FRANK SCOTTO TOWING
Vendor
By: �-al,J a
FRANK A. SCOTTO
Sole Proprietor
TITLE
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 29th day of
September
, 19 92
N • , ARY PUBLI9 IN AND FOR
S ID COUNTY AND STATE
U ��� Juditn J. 9nS
:y.z;c r � Comm. C33 7 7
Li Q�i ,1. _;FOFNIA�
LOS ANGELES COUNTY n
4(IiONN. + ^ My Comm. Expues AFrt 22. 19S6"'�
FRANK N. STOLTZ
Certified Public Accountant
1030 Stone Canyon Rd. • Los Angeles. CA 90077 • (213) 472-2569 • FAX (213) 472-1079
Frank Scotto Towing
Gentlemen:
I have compiled the accompanying balance sheet of Frank Scotto
Towing as of December 31, 1991, and the related statement of income
for the year then ended, in accordance with standards establised by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
A compilation is limitied to presenting in the form of
financial statements information that is a representation of
management. I have not audited or reviewed the accompanying
financial statements and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or
any other form of assurance on them.
Management has elected to omit substantially all of the
disclosures and the Cash Flow Statement required by generally
accepted accounting principles. If the omitted disclosures were
included in the financial statements, they might influence the
user's conclusion's about the company's financial position, results
of operations, and changes in financial position. Accordingly,
these financial statements are not designed for those who are not
informed about such matters.
September 13, 1992
Los Angeles, California
IL L�
Frank N. Stoltz, CPA
FRANK SCOTTO TOWING
BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 1991
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS;
CASH ON HAND
$ 1,508
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, at cost
LAND - 338,997
BUILDINGS 643,561
IMPROVEMENTS 16,000
AUTOS, AND TOW TRUCKS 1,051,552
INTANGIBLES 16,675
2,186,492
LESS -ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION 897,784
TOTAL ASSETS $ 1,290,216
LIABILITIES AND NET WORTH
CURRENT LIABILITES:
BANK OVERDRAFT $ 7,491
CURRENT PORTION OF LONG-TERM DEBT (NOTE 2) 171,727
PAYROLL TAXES 962
WORKER COMPENSATION INSURANCE 3,024
DUE TO AFFILATE 3,000
SALES TAX 700
TOTAL CURRENT LIABLITIES 186,904
LONG TERM DEBT, LESS CURRENT PORTION
SHOWN ABOVE (NOTE 2) 994,657
NET WORTH:
BALANCE, BEGINNING OF YEAR
PERSONAL DRAWS
INCOME FOR YEAR
TOTAL NET WORTH
113,715
<65,562>
60,502
108,655
TOTAL LIABILTIES AND NET WORTH $ 1,290,216
The accompanying notes are an intergral part of these financial
statements.
FRANK SCOTTO TOWING
INCOME STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1991
REVENUES:
PUBLIC TOWING $ 375,736
COMMERCIAL TOWING 795,375
MUNICIPAL AND STATE TOWING 398,370
LIEN SALES 131.684
TOTAL 1,701,165
OPERATING EXPENSES: -
WAGES AND PAYROLL TAXES 647,612
TOW TRUCK FUEL,REPAIRS,AND DAMAGES 172,376
INSURANCE 135,151
OUTSIDE SERVICES 90,844
UTILITIES AND TELEPHONE 61,239
FEES, LICENSES AND PERMITS 57,837
ADVERTISING 47,358
SUPPLIES 23,290
FACILITY MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR 21,182
LEGAL AND ACCOUNTING 7,525
OTHER EXPENSES 14,746
DEPRECIATION 223,510
TOTAL EXPENSES 1,502,670
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS 198,495
OTHER INCOME <EXPENSES>:
INTEREST EXPENSE <159,207>
GAIN ON THE SALE OF TOW TRUCKS 21,214
TOTAL <137,993>
NET INCOME $ 60,502
The accompanying notes are an intergral part of these financial
statements.
FRANK SCOTTO TOWING
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -CASH BASIS
DECEMBER 31, 1991
NOTE 1 --SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
*Principles of Accounting
The Company prepares its financial statements on the cash
basis, but includes depreciation and amortization of
capitalized assets. Under this basis, revenues are recognized
when collected rather than when earned, and expenses are
recognized when paid rather than when incurred. Consequently,
accounts receivable due from customers, amounts due vendors
and suppliers, and the unpaid portion of taxes at December 31,
1991 are not included in the financial statements.
*Property and Equipment
If an expenditure results in an asset having an estimated life
that extends beyond the year of acquisition, the expenditure
is capitalized. The capitalized assets are being depreciated
as follows:
Tow Trucks 5 years
Equipment 5-7 years
Buildings 15-30 years
Intangibles 60 months
NOTE 2 --LONG TERM DEBT
The company finances the acquisition of tow trucks with a
bank. The loans are repaid over periods ranging from 4 to 7
years at fixed interest rates ranging from 11% to 12 1/2% per
annum. The company as also financing its property with a bank
at a variable rate which has ranged from 9.875% to 11.0% for
the year. A summary of the short-term and long-term debt is
as follows:
Tow Trucks
Property
Total
Short term
$ 140,472 $
31,255
$ 171,727 $
Long term
266,143
728,514
994,157
Total
$ 406,615
759,769
$1,166,384
OCTOBER 1, 1992
EXHIBIT B
/AsN 7OWh'I G
20621 EARL STREET
TORRANCE, CALIF. PHONE: 370-4533
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
540 PIER AVE
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254-3885
RE: PROPOSAL FOR FURNISHING TOW SERVICE AND STORAGE
GARAGE.
" BIDDERS STATEMENT OF ABILITY TO COMPLY" AS REQUIRED
IN SPECIFICATIONS, IV,E.
VAN LINGEN TOWING OPERATES A POLICE IMPOUND FACILITY AT
20621 EARL STREET, TORRANCE, CA. WE ARE APPROX. 4 MILES
FROM HERMOSA BEACH CIVIC CENTER. WE HAVE BEEN SPECIALIZING
IN POLICE IMPOUND TOWING SINCE 1948. WE OWN OUR FACILITY
OUTRIGHT. OUR FLEET OF 12 TRUCKS INCLUDE ULTRA MODERN
WHEEL LIFT ONE TON TRUCKS, TWO FLATBEDS ( BOTH LARGE AND
SMALL), ONE MEDIUM DUTY 30,000 LB. UNDERREACH TRUCK, ONE
40 TON TOWING AND RECOVERY UNIT, AND ONE MAXIMUM CAPACITY
50 RECOVERY UNIT WITH A 50,000 LB UNDERREACH. OUR FACILITY
IS ONE AND ONE QUARTER ACRES LARGE AND SECURELY STORES
APPROX 200 VEHICLES. WE PROVIDE SECURITY THRU THE
UTILIZATION OF MICRO WAVE AND INFRA RED SILENT INTERIOR AND
PERIMETER ALARMS. OUR "CSI" ROOM IS COMPLETELY ENCLOSED AND
SEPARATE FROM THE IMPOUND AREAS AND IS ALARMED SEPARATELY,
COMPLETELY SECUREABLE TO MAINTAIN THE CHAIN OF EVIDENCE, AND
PROVIDES 24 HR ACCESS THRU EXTERIOR MAN DOORS FOR POLICE
PERSONNEL. WE PROVIDE POLICE IMPOUND AND STORAGE SERVICES
FOR THE TORRANCE POLICE DEPT., THE PALOS VERDES POLICE
DEPT., THE CALIF. HIGHWAY PATROL, AND THE LOS ANGLES COUNTY
MARSHALLS OFFICE. (SEE ATTACHED LIST OF CONTACTS FOR
REFERENCE PURPOSES) WE HAVE ATTACHED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND INSURANCE CERTIFICATES THAT PROVIDE SUBSTANATION OF
OUR SOUND FINANCIAL STANDINGS. WE ARE POLICE TOWING AND
RECOVERY SPECIALISTS AND HAVE THROUGHLY READ AND UNDERSTAND
THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. WE STAND
UN-PARRELLED IN READINESS AND ABILITY TO PERFORM FOR THE
NEEDS OF HERMOSA BEACH. WE COULD FILL VOLUMES ON OUR
UNIQUE AND UNSURPASSED QUALIFICATIONS, HOWEVER WE BELIEVE
OUR REPUTATION SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. A CALL TO ANY OR ALL OF
OUR LISTED REFERENCES WILL ATTEST TO OUR STANDING WITHIN
THE COMMUNITY.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION.
•
ROBERT VAN LINGEij
OCTOBER 1, 1992
EXHIBIT C
AN liNGEH TOWING
20621 EARL STREET
TORRANCE, CALIF. PHONE: 370-4533
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
540 PIER AVE
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254-3885
RE: PROPOSAL FOR FURNISHING TOWING SERVICE AND STORAGE
GARAGE.
ADDITIONAL EXPLANATION OF BID ON RATES AND CHARGES:
POLICE IMPOUND INDUSTRY STANDARD FOR RATES AND CHARGES IS
NORMALLY ON AN HOURLY BASIS. THIS HOURLY RATE WOULD INCLUDE
ALL LOCK -OUTS, LINKAGE DISCONNECTS, DOLLIES ETC.
WE AGREE AND WILL COMPLY WITH WHICH EVER SYSTEM THE CITY
ADOPTS. IF THE HOURLY METHOD IS PREFERRED, ITEMS "C" AND "D"
WOULD BE INCLUDED AND NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE ASSESSED AS ITEMS
"A" AND "B" WOULD COVER THEM.
ROBERT VAN LINGEy
VAN LINGEN TOWING
OCTOBER 1, 1992
EXHIBIT D
IAN L NCS''! TOWING
20621 EARL STREET
TORRANCE, CALIF. PHONE: 370-4533
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
540 PIER AVE
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254-3885
RE: PROPOSAL FOR FURNISHING TOW SERVICE AND STORAGE
GARAGE.
REFERENCE CONTACTS FOR AGENCIES THAT RECEIVE LIKE SERVICE
ON POLICE TOWING AGREEMENTS.
1) CITY OF TORRANCE.
TORRANCE POLICE DEPT.
CAPTAIN HARVEY SIEGEL
(310) 618-5696
2) CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES
POLICE DEPT.
CAPTAIN TRACY
(310) 378-4211
3) CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
SOUTH LA OFFICE
OFFICER FENNELL
(310) 323-5450
4) LOS ANGLES COUNTY MARSHALL
SOUTH BAY COURT
LT. PUGH
(310) 533-3344
PROPOSAL FOR
TOWING AND STORAGE OF VEHICLES
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
To the City Council of the
City of Hermosa Beach
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
The undersigned offers to perform all of the duties and obliga-
tions required of the Tow Service and Storage Garage Operator by
the provisions of the "Specifications for. Towing Service and
Storage Garage, City of Hermosa Beach": dated 10-1-92 , at
the prices and for consideration herein provided and to tow vehi-
cles when so directed by the Police Department of the City of
Hermosa Beach at the following prices:
1. RATES AND CHARGES:
(A) Police -ordered impound tow charges for passenger type
vehicles and pick-up trucks up to 1 ton capacity during
the hours of daylight will be at the rate of
SIXTY FIVE DOLLARS ($ 65.00
(Words and Figures)
and during the hours of darkness at the rate of
SIXTY FIVE DOLLARS ($ 65.00
(Words and Figures)
(B) Police -ordered impound tow charges for trucks (1 ton and
over) heavy equipment during the hours of daylight will
be at the rate of
ONE HUNDRED TWENTY SEVEN ($ 127.00
(Words and Figures)
and during the hours of darkness at the rate of
•I`/ONE HUNDRED TWENTY SEVEN ($ 127.00
(Words and Figures)
0j•
i:.
(C) Where additional labor is required to facilitate the
movement of the vehicle, it may be charged at the rate
of:
NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE ($ NO CHARGE )
(Words and Figures)
(D) Should the use of a dolly or motorcycle trailer be re-
quired, the use thereof may be charged at the rate of:
NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE ($ NO CHARGE
(Words and Figures)
(E) Where the tow truck has been ordered, arrives at the
scene and vehicle is released without towing services
being performed, the charge for the tow truck shall be:
NO CHARGE
($ NO CHARGE
(Words and Figures)
(F) The charge for a vehicle release during other than the
normal operating hours of 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Mon-
day through Friday (Saturday and Sunday) (Insert operat-
ing hours) shall be a fee not to exceed for each service
rendered, the amount of:
THIRTY TWO DOLLARS AND FIFTY CENTS 32.50 )
(,Words and Figures)
• J7
.,
1. RATES AND CHARGES:
(B) Storage of vehicles shall be charged at the rate per day
of:
1. For Motorcycles $ 4.00
2. For passenger cars and pick-up $ 12.00
trucks up to 1 ton capacity
3. For trucks and heavy equipment
1 ton and over
16.00
4. Any part of one day will constitute one day's
storage.
2. LOCATION:
(A) Short-term storage yard facilities (Paragraph IVA. of
specifications) are located at:
20621 EARL STREET, TORRANCE, CA
(B) Impound garage facility (Paragraph IVA. of specifica-
tions) is located at:
20621 EARL STREET, TORRANCE, CA
(C) Storage facilities for long-term impounds (Paragraph
IVB. of specifications) are located at:
20621 EARL STREET, TORRANCE, CA
3. I (we) hereby certify that I (we) own/lease (check one) the
real property that will be used for:
(A) Short-term storage yard facilities x Own Lease
(B) Short-term garage facility X Own Lease
(C) Long-term storage yard facilities X Own Lease
4. If leasing the property mentioned in (3) above, please state
the following:
Name of Lessor:
Address of Lessor:
Street
Date of lease expiration:
City State
5. I hereby certify that I have read the Notice to Bidders and
the Specifications for Towing Service and Storage Garage,
City of Hermosa Beach, and I am able to comply with all re-
quirements as listed therein. The figures listed on these
proposal sheets constitute my bid for the furnishing of
towing service and storage garage facilities to the City of
Hermosa Beach for the period of three (3) years commencing
I ACKNOWLEDGE THE REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION AS
CALLED OUT HEREIN.
•
•In.,h
VAN LINGEN TOWING
NAME ,QF COMPANY
';/./7 ,�
BY !1''Y
TITLE
ROBERT VAN LINGEN, VICE-PRES.
20621 EARL ST., TORRANCE, CA 90503
ADDRESS OF COMPANY
(310) 370-4533
PHONE NUMBER OF COMPANY
DATE OF THIS PROPOSAL
OCT. 1, 1992
5
EXHIBIT
OF BID NO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) )
SS. VENDOR'S AFFIDAVIT
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)
ROBERT VAN LINGEN
sworn, deposed and says:
, being first duly
1. That he is the VICE-PRESIDENT OF VAN LINGEN BODY SHOP INC
(Insert: Title of office if a corporation,
DBA VAN LINGEN TOWING
"Sole Owner," "A Partner," or other proper title.)
herein called "vendor" who has submitted to the
City of Hermosa Beach a proposal for the construction of
FURNISHING TOWING SERVICE AND STORAGE GARAGE
2. That said proposal is genuine; that the same is not sham,
that all statements of fact therein are true;
3. That such proposal was not made in the interest or behalf of
any person, partnership, company, association, organization
or corporation not named or disclosed;
4. That the Vendor did not, directly or indirectly, induce,
solicit, or agree with anyone else to submit a false or sham
bid, to refrain from bidding, or to withdraw his bid, to
raise or fix the bid price of the Vendor or of anyone else,
or to rise or fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the
Vendor price or the price of anyone else; and did not attempt
to induce action prejudicial to the interest of the City of
Hermosa Beach or of any other bidder, or anyone else inter-
ested in the proposed contract;
5. That the Vendor has not in any manner sought by collusion to
secure for himself an advantage over any other bidder or to
induce action prejudicial to the interests of the City of
Hermosa Beach or of any other bidder or of anyone else inter-
ested in the proposed contract;
6. That the Vendor has not accepted any bid from any subcontrac-
tor or materialman through any bid depository, the bye-laws,
rules or regulations of which prohibit or prevent the Vendor
from considering any bid from any sub -contractor or material -
man, which is not proceeded through said bid depository, or
which prevent any subcontractor or materialman from bidding
to any vendor who does not use the facilities of or accept
bids from or through such bid depository;
7. That the Vendor did not, directly or indirectly submit the
Vendor's bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents
thereof, or divulge information or data relative thereto, to
any corporation, partnership, company, association, organiza-
tion, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof, or
individual or group of individuals, except to the City of
Hermosa Beach or to any person or persons who have a partner-
ship or other financial interest with said Vendor in his
business.
Dated this FIRST day of OCT. 1992
SEAL
VAN T.TNCEN TOWING
ROBERT VAN LINGEN
-V TCF - PRES__
TITLE
Subscribed and sworn to before me this LSt day of October
19 92
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND
SAID COUNTY AND STATE
UFFICIAL SEAL
KATHRON A. LOYD
Notary Public • California
I.
PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN
L. A. COUNTY
My Comm. Exp. Nov. 4. 1994
EXHIBIT H
VAN LINGEN AUTO BODY, INC.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Year Ended December 31, 1991
1
I have compiled the accompanying balance sheet of Van Lingen
Auto Body, Inc., as of December 31,-1991, and related statement
of income, in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
A compilation is limited to presenting in the form of finan-
cial statements information that is the representation of manage-
ment. I have not audited or reviewed the accompanying financial
statements and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or any
other form of assurance on them.
August 31, 1992
2
VAN LINGEN BODY SHOP, INC
BALANCE SHEET
12/31/91
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
CASH ON HAND AND IN BANK_ 7,467.39
DEFERRED CALIFORNIA TAXES 1,600.00
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 35,205.72
ADVANCES 70.00
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 44,343.11
FIXED ASSETS
FURNITURE & FIXTURES 16,744.00
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT - 41,489.16
AUTOS & TRUCKS 546,612.70
LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS 81,767.01
ALLOWANCE FOR DEPRECIATION < 272,629.78>
TOTAL FIXED ASSETS
OTHER ASSETS
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS
413,983.09
0.00
TOTAL ASSETS 458,326.20
VAN LINGEN BODY SHOP, INC
BALANCE SHEET
12/31/91
LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 54,054.97
FEDERAL PAYROLL TAX PAYABLE 8,063.10
CALIFORNIA PAYROLL TAX PAYABLE < 711.78>
CALIFORNIA SALES TAX PAYABLE 1,979.51
WORKERS COMP INSURANCE PAYABLE 4,969.94
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 68,355.74
LONG TERM LIABILITIES
NOTE PAYABLE
TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES
156,575.63
156,575.63
TOTAL LIABILITIES 224,931.37
EQUITIES
CAPITAL STOCK
RETAINED EARNINGS-ACCUMMULATED
NET INCOME <LOSS>
10,000.00
3,087.55
220,307.28
=======
TOTAL EQUITIES 233,394.83
TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY 458,326.20
VAN LINGEN BODY SHOP, INC
STATEMENT OF INCOME
FROM 01/01/91 TO 12/31/91
REVENUE
BODY SHOP OPERATIONS
TOWING INCOME
MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES
STORAGE FEES
LIEN SALES INCOME
CURRENT YEAR TO DATE
_ 124,471.00
107,819.85
8,038.24
43,027.85
4,016.00
650,353.57
603,446.05
12,347.69
234,763.26
20,321.00
TOTAL REVENUE 287,372.94 1,521,231.57
COST OF OPERATIONS
REFUNDS _ 89.60 2,030.51
DISCOUNTS GIVEN 357.35 2,145.99
FREIGHT 437.89 2,998.14
RENT FOR YARD 3,000.00 21,000.00
DIRECT LABOR 57,928.58 329,245.22
FUEL, GAS, ETC. 11,644.30 45,115.72
REPAIRS - TRUCKS & EQUIPMENT 1,520.65 2,982.00
OUTSIDE SERVICES 15,896.20 51,693.57
PURCHASES 36,807.41 353,345.50
UNIFORMS & LAUNDRY 1,181.78 2,058.68
RENTAL EQUIPMENT 225.07 1,743.84
OTHER DIRECT COSTS 354.39 1,462.94
TOTAL COST OF SALES
GROSS PROFIT ON OPERATIONS
ADMINISTRATION & INDIRECT COST
129,443.22 815,822.11
157,929.72 705,409.46
OFFICE SALARIES 31,230.99 182,711.99
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 600.00 5,075.88
ADVERTISING & PROMOTION 1,428.28 5,293.09
AUTOMOBILE EXPENSES 467.35 1,362.10
RENT FOR OFFICE & YARD 6,000.00 6,000.00
BUILDING & YARD MAINTENANCE 0.00 2,563.53
PAYROLL SUSPENSE < 806.71> < 2,146.08>
CONTRIBUTIONS 620.00 5,799.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 780.86 4,823.35
DEPRECIATION 64,616.00 64,616.00
HOSPITAL & MEDICAL INSURANCE 1,929.10 12,096.09
INSURANCE 10,112.01 95,645.18
INTEREST EXPENSE 0.00 452.63
VAN LINGEN BODY SHOP, INC
STATEMENT OF INCOME
FROM 01/01/91 TO 12/31/91
CURRENT YEAR TO DATE
LEASING & RENTALS 1,505.81 6,092.54
LICENSE FEES 1,559.00 8,007.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES & STATIONERY_ 165.91 7,660.77
PAYROLL TAXES 7,142.95 41,926.08
REPAIRS TO OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0.00 247.00
OTHER COSTS OF OPERATION 0.00 1,412.36
TELEPHONE & UTILITIES 4,553.09 23,834.35
TAXES 822.28 11,629.32
TOTAL ADMIN & OPERATIONS COSTS
NET INCOME <LOSS>
r
132,726.92 485,102.18
25,202.80 220,307.28
•
► 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 318-0237
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
v:• BUSINESS LICENSE
ISSUED TO (BUSINESS OWNER):
ROBERT VAN LINGEN - VICE PRES.
TO CONDUCT THE (BUSINESS CLASSIFICATION):
TOWING SERVICE
BUSINESS AS (DBA BUSINESS NAME):
VAN LINGEN TOWING
LOCATED AT (BUSINESS LOCATION):
20621 EARL STREET
TORRANCE. CA
000000000
90503
4492
FROM: 09/01/92 TO: 08/31/93
NOT TRANSFERABLE -POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE
EXHIBIT E
FEE SCHEDULE
D-11
ti
SECOND OWNER
NAME: INEZ VAN LINGEN - PRESIDENT
EMERGENCY CONTACT
NAME
PHONE:
I
BUSINESS PHONE: 3103704533
1
MAILING VAN LINGEN TOWING
ADDRESS 20621 EARL STREET
TORRANCE, CA
90503
h
v
09/14/92 LICENSE FEE
FOR 3
UNITS REPORTED
276. 00
TOTAL PAID $276. 00
3,JBJLCI In REVOCATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF HERMOSA BEACH
,knob:)). CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE:..
PRODUCER .: •
CENTERPOINTE INSURANCE SERVICES, LTD.
28720 ROADSIDE DRIVE, SUITE 299
AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301
CODE SUB -CODE
INSURED
:VAN LINGEN BODY SHOP, INC.
20621 EARL STREET
TORRANCE, CA 90503
ISSUE DATE IMM/OO/YY)
EXHIBIT F
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,
EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY A FIRST NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.
LETTER
COMPANY 8
LETTER
COMPANY C
I LETTER
I COMPANY D
LETTER
COMPANY E
LETTER
COVERAGES ;+:z...,:...k ..,;�.•,. « ,•
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS.
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION
CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE (MM/DD/YY) DATE (MM/DO/YY)
LTR
A.
GENERAL LIABILITY
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CLAIMS MADE' OCCUR..
OWNER'S 8 CONTRACTOR'S PROT.
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
' ANY AUTO
ALL OWNED AUTOS
X , SCHEDULED AUTOS
X HIRED AUTOS
X NON -OWNED AUTOS
X I GARAGE LIABILITY
EXCESS LIABIUTY
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
OTHER
A GARAGEKEEPERS LEGAL
ON HOOK
BA7750689 1-19-92
•
BA7750689
IM7750689
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS
SEE ATTACHED LIST FOR ON HOOK VEHICLES
1-19-92
1-19-92
1-19-93
ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS
GENERAL AGGREGATE f
PRODUCTS-COMP/OPS AGGREGATE! S
PERSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY
EACH OCCURRENCE
FIRE DAMAGE (Any one Ilre)
$
$
S
MEDICAL EXPENSE (Any one person/ I S
COMBINED :
LIMGLE S1, 000
BODILY
INJURY S I
(Per person(:
BODILY
INJURY S I
(Per accident)
PROPERTY
DAMAGE
S
S
EACH
OCCURRENCE,
S S
STATUTORY
1-19-93 $100,000
1-19-93 $VARIOUS
AGGREGATE
(EACH ACCIDENT)
(DISEASE—POLICY LIMIT)
(DISEASE—EACH EMPLOYEE)
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
ACORD 25-S (3/88)
CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO
MAIL 1 0 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE
LEFT• BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NO4CE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR
LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPli,NY. ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES.
AUTHO EI(t REPRESENTATIVE
I ..
•
/ti7 44C
mA RD CORPORATION 1988
3AFECO
ISSUE DATE
03-09-92
ADDITIONAL DECLARATIONS
REVISED
T1IS DECLARATION IS ATTACHED Ti AND FORMS
A PART OF THE POLICY SPECIFIED ABOVE
PREM
400
N/A
BLDG
NO.
INLAND MARINE
COVERAGE DESCRIPTION
MOTOR TRUCK CARGO-TRUCKMANS NAMED PERIL
1. 1986
2. 1978
3. 1989
4. 1987
5. 1987
6. 1979
T. 1989
8. 1991
9 1991
10. 1990
CHEVY C30 VIN;: 1GBHC34H2GH118?74
INT'L VINO E2327HJA10059
FORD F450 VINO 2FDLF47M2(CB39775
CHEVY C30 VIVA: 1GBHR.34NHJ113041
PETE2BILT VI4:1XP9LB9X3HJ21148?
INT'L VIN;; AA182JHA34114
FORD F450 VINO 2FOLF47MOJCA22338
FORD SUPER DUTY VINO 2F0LF474C42)132
FORD SUPER DUTY VIV►: 2FDLF474C42)141
FORD SUPER DUTY VIVA 2FDLF4T49LC45)111
DEDJCTIBLE
YOUR DEDUZTIBLE IS
FORMS APPLICABLE TO THIS COVERAGE
COMMERCIAL INLAND MARINE CONDITIONS
MANUSCRIPT COVERAGE
DEDUCTIBLE
ADDITIONAL EXCLUSIOVS
MOTOR TRUCK CARGO INSURANCE
CHANGE DATE 02-25-92
CH 10 07 11-85
ORIGINAL
POLICY 40
CP 7750689
LIMIT OF
INSURANCE
CM 00 01
C4 70 00
CM 74 01
CM 74 02
MAR 804
525.000
5100,000
$25,000
525,000
$250,0n0
S25,000
525,000
;25,000
525,000
$25,000
51,000
10-Q1
05-90
09-86
03-87
11-69
1992 BEST'S KEY RATING GUIDE - PROPERTY -CASUALTY EDITION
ANNUAL STATEMENT DATA FOR YEARS 1987 - 1991
Company Name
(Group Affiliation/
Principal Officer
Mailing Address
Began Bus. : Structure : Mkting
Spewtty
Phone s
AMB 1 NAIL 1
res Rating -
Balance Sheet
Operations
M
o
d
Best's �
Rating i
&P
FSC °
s
F
Date
1 Year
Cash
&
Short-
Term
Invest.
(%)
Stocks
and
Bonds
(%)
All
Other
Assets
(%)
Total
Admitted
Assets
(5000)
Loss
Res.
(%)
Un-
earned
Prem.
CO
All
Other
Uab.
(%)
Total
Liabilities
(5000)
Policy.
holders'
Surplus
(5000)
Direct
Premiums
Written
(5000)
Net
Premiums
Written
(5000)
Bus.
Net
Ret
(%)
Net
Under-
writing
Income
(5000)
-
Net
Imesbn ent
Income
(5000)
Net
Income
Before
Tax
(3000)
Net
Income
(50001
FIRST NATIONAL INS CO OF AMER
(SAFECO Insurance Companies)
aes
James W. Cannon. President
SAFECO Ptar
Seattle. WA 98 185
85
1928 : StockPersl: A �
206-545-5000
AMB !02446 NAIL 124724
%ROOK CORP SYNDICATE
FIRST OAR Cadging')ge)
Insure=NA-4
A /
64
A+
M
Ado
XIPrirasel
•
84-4
114-3
463
NA -3
IV
C
NA -7
NA -7
NA -7
0
RI
N8-3
10-3
8A-3
NA -3
T
83-3
NA -3
M
NA -i
NA -S
98-6
8-
NA -S
M
44
AA
A++
T
A4
Al
A+
Ai
XV
A+
A4
A4
44
80
p
p
P
p
p
r
'
e
a
a
c p
c p
c p
p
p
p
P
0
p
17
18
89
10
11
17
1t
5 19
5 10
6 11
Rndpel
17
'I8
19
10
'91
17
11
I 19
1 10
1 11
PnkrdpalliriesNOtlre
'88
19
I '90
1 11
P'^0ml
17
11
'89
10
11
PrinoOr
'89
10
'91
P'"'ooM
'87
18
'89
'90
'91
Prsrsel
'88
'89
10
'91
Promo((
6.1 81.3 12.5 113.202
38 83.7 125 121,305
10.9 17.4 11.7 137,307
4.6 83.2 121 147,015
5.8 82.8 11.4 158.836
Lines Aub habit► 35.9%. Auto Ph9etI
440 • • • 56.0 6262
59.6 - • • 40.4 1,096
49.6 • • - 50.4 9,135
55.5 • • • 44.5 14.688
42.1 10.3 47.6 20219
liner Other lista, 49.8%. Cao1 MdtAsi
97 67.4 22.9 2.358
29.0 594 11.5 2.488
72 55 5 31.3 2.704
22 50.3 47 5 2.796
3.7 48.2 481 1.947
93.9 0.4 5.7 26.540
22.0 68.1 9.9 33.114
12.5 81.3 6.2 37.195
42.8 45.4 11.7 35.822
20.6 11.9 7.5 31.974
100.0%.
53.0 30.8 162 9.776
23.1 516 22.3 9.615
25.0 385 365 14.899
36.9 346 28.5 11.250
Lines Other U1t8140.6%. Auto Physic"
14.1 409 45.1 21,322
9.7 36.6 53.8 22.457
92 458 450 22,910
12.2 36.8 50.9 22.903
13.5 360 50.5 19,499
lines Aub Le6ity 45.2%. Wakes' Can
261 714 19 15,379
82 88.2 3.6 17,507
11.3 84 4 13 21.154
Imes: Rens-Casualty 62 0%, Other Lla6ih
42 93.8 2.0 342.103
1.7 95.6 21 398.700
20 95.2 2.8 424,663
3.3 93.7 2.9 451.568
1.8 96.1 21 486.799
Ueec Plataa Cane 26.4%. Auto Wein
15 8 82.1 2.1 1.112
3.5 65.3 31.3 15.590
4 4 93 5 2.1 16.860
6.8 915 1.1 18641
Lees Gan I WARM 34.6%, Wafters
64.5 27.4 8.1 81.315 31,887
66.5 25.9 76 90.239 31.065
68.3 24.1 76 100186 37.021
69.9 234 6.7 T07.278 39.736
71.0 226 6.5 109.995 48.892
19.1 %. Norme errs 15.8%. Wakes' Cans 8.6%. Cae1
18.3 78.4 3.3 3,127 3,135
272 71.4 1.4 3.375 3.721
45.5 54.1 0.4 5.097 4.038
53.4 46.6 0.0 8.937 5,752
63.3 36.7 • - - 12,421 7,798
37.6%. Fn 9.0%, Aub F9i
• • • - • • 100.0 58 2.300
• • - • • - IMO 46 2.442
- - - , - • 100.0 86 2.618
• - - • • • 100.0 38 2.757
- • - • • • 100.0 335 1.612
1.7 88.1 3.5 1.723 24,816
51.4 30.6 ' 18.0 8.181 24.933
76.2 20.1 3.7 12.321 21.873
64.8 1.4 33.8 11.398 24.424
76.0 - • - 24.0 9.365 22.609
33.4 11.0 55.7 5.667 1.108
56.0 169 212 5.609 4.006
55.0 17.5 21.5 11.593 3.307
51.5 18.9 23.6 13.159 4.098
36.3%. Auto Laity 18.6%, Gra* A & H 2.7%. Fire 1.2%
90.4 12.4 -2.8 16.133 5.189
85.9 15.4 -1.3 16,160 6.297
775 21.1 0.8 16.422 6,488
71.2 24.4 4 4 16.886 5.018
790 24I -3.1 17,137 2.363
21.4%, Auto Physeal 14.3%. Allied lines 6.0%. Fre 4.1%.
• • • • • - 100.0 286 15.094
78.5 60 15.5 1.343 16.164
82.2 14 6 3 2 3.884 17.271
20.1%. Rem-Praoerty 6.3%. Products Lab19, 50%.
11.0 24.3 4 7 256.641 85,456
73.1 22.1 4 2 283.687 108.013
72.7 20.7 6 5 306,327 118.336
73.7 19.5 6.8 323.912 133.656
754 191 5.5 333.467 153.332
22.7%. Can(M ttiPer813.6%, Auto siaOtherl 9.2%. O
- - . • - - 100.0 16 1.096
91.6 - - - 8.4 7.986 7,604
89.1 • - • 109 8.513 8.287
862 -.• 13.8 9,260 9.381
Cane
Ca25.0%. tbreeaes 12.4%. Auto Uta
114.633 57.302 31.9 -1.573
143.018 60.659 28.5 -801
154.312 63.820 27.8 -2.859
111291 67.521 26.6 .4 807
183.382 65.188 23.8 -5.622
M llPn* 6.1% RiminiWesWA 17.0%:
11.139 4.851 43A 112
10.815 5.942 52.1 321
15.459 8.558 54.9 67
19.836 10.822 54.3 -184
18.481 11.391 61.6 -446
Priam, PrnStales CA49.3%:
6.316 44
6.750 -95
5.832 - - - - -36
4.624 - , - 43
4.931 - - - 206
Prr dpel Stabs III 100.0%
- • - 1.689 100.0 -487
- - 6,603 493 -911
- • • 1,657 50.6 -3.007
- - 1,921 26.4 -4,369
• -299 -22.1 -4.553
9242 1.613 16 2 270
8.879 2.484 263 -380
14.045 6,029 12.9 -1.579
16.162 1.075 435 -776
Pexin! States M 100.0%
13.324 7.354 53.4 -1.853
13.262 10991 81.1 343
16.219 12.671 751 -505
22.055 16.526 72.3 -194
22.956 11.834 742 -3.672
Pracpl Slates FL 51.3%;
- . - - • -22
7.666 1,527 16.8 293
12.894 3.341 22.0 394
Med Malom re 3.4%. Prince( Sates: IA 51.0%:
317.433 157.061 33.1 -5.621
228.711 152.009 39.9 -4,116
157,367 116.995 48 3 -11.220
125.148 141.054 540 -14.656
136.343 145,768 51.1 -16.115
lib* 8.6%. . Prarpl States CA 88.1 %:
.. - ...
11 9.344 999 228
114 10.213 919 106
238 10.665 971 166
Ore WWI 4.3%. Pnrripal Rata MO 67.5%
7.815 6241 8.471
8.683 1876 6.804
10.322 7.464 8.701
11.149 6.343 7.288
11.499 5.818 5.733
C114.0%; TX 10.6%; OR 6.6%: GA 63%
122 234 231
180 501 501
250 317 210
377 192 -114
416 -29 -29
l 10.9%: PA tit 1114.0%; A23.5%
133 69 35
150 56 133
133 97 112
111 154 151
89 295 295
411 -76 5
1.813 872 293
1.364 4.643 -1,464
2.332 -2.037 821
1.900 4653 -1,749
287 557 278
670 290 -151
666 -912 -1.028
623 -152 -152
1,550 -303 527
1,106 1,419 1,201
1,475 970 901
1157 1.063 1.074
1.187 -2.486 -2443
GA 10.51:140 9.81:SC 8.4%: TX 61%
143 120 94
1.047 1.340 1.070
1.203 1,597 1.111
0H 16.8%: NO 15.7%: CA3.51:12.81
22.441 16.820 18.030
26.094 21.917 22.589
31.815 20.655 11.244
36.494 28.838 16,004
39.371 23256 19.996
L 10.31:14662%; TX 6.4%; PA 5.6%
103 103 96
690 918 669
1.004 1.110 1.024
1.122 1.288 1.120
PA 32.5%
(Illinois
Joseph P. Woke, k. President
1301 Westnd Street Suite 1100
Oak amok 0. 60521
1986: Stock : Broker
E708474-92600
AMB R105 77 NAIL 109989
FIRST PREFERRED INSURANCE CO
(&a= Insurance Group(
B. D. Loving. President
P.O. Boa BIG
Wichita fabs. TX 76307
1966: Stock : Agency
Personal Lines
817.322-4884
AMB *04052 NAI; ! 20036
THE FIRST
REINS 013 OF ItARTFORD kisMutlona Immo Growl
(Financial
John A. Dore. President & CEO
45 Wilt MainStreet
Avon. CT 06001111-3
1913: Stock : Agency
Reim Pronely, Professional Liab
203.674.1058
AMB 104826 NAIL !37184
FIRST SECURITY CASUALTY CO
(First Secunty Insurance Group)
Richard F. Manx. President
307 5 5 BarBarringtonMadison Heights, MI 48071
Hei
1985: Stock: Agency
Other Liebkty, Personal Auto
313.588.7470
AMB ! 10903 NAIL Pt 24490
INSURANCE ECO
FIRST (No Group
(No Group AffilMion)
Calvin W. Carter, President
P.O. Box 3370
Tamps, Ft 33 6 601
1963: Stock : Agency
Commerce' Auto
813.221-7777
AMB 10064 7 NAIL 11 1975
FIRST SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORP (MO)
(Empbyers Re Group)
Denis J. deBaroncelk. President
P. 0. Bk
6
Overlord Parrk.. KSS 6620!
1990: Stock : Agency
Excess6Surdus
913-6765800
AMB *107 8 3 NAIL *3491 6
FIRST (ITT Hartland Insurance Group( STATE INSURANCE CO (DE)
(IT
Ralph J. Palmieri, President
150 Federal Street84
Boston. MA 02110.10.1753
1949: Stock : Agency
Excess&Surdus
617.526.7600
AMB !02187 NAIL ! 21822
FIRSTUNE NATIONAL INS CO
(Harford Mutual Group)
Thomas A. Burke. President 6 CEO
MainStreet
200 Nath 2101d•3.3541
BN 4ir, MO 210
1988: Stock : Agency
Commerce' Lees. Muntrde Lines
410.838.4000
AMB *10633 NAIL 840100
202 - Call 900-420-040010r the latest Best's Ratings -
1992 BEST'S KEY RATING GUIDE -PROPERTY -CASUALTY
EXHIBIT G
GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY
P.O. Box 85826 - San Diego, CA 92186-5826 PCN:281629 6
WORKERS'' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY
DECLARATION
Policy No: PWC -183933-00
Item 1:
Insured's Name and Address: - Insured is: CORPORATION
VAN LINGEN BODY SHOP, INC.
20621 EARL ST.
TORRANCE CA 90503
Locations: All usual workplaces of the Insured at or from which operations covered by
this policy are conducted are located at the address of the Insured unless
otherwise stated herein.
SAME AS ITEM #1
Item 2: Policy Period From: 1 JUL 92 To: 3. JUL 93
12:01 a.m. standard time at the address of the Insured as stated herein.
Item 3:
Coverage A of this policy applies to the Workers' Compensation laws and any occupa-
tional disease law of each of the following states: CALIFORNIA
Item 4: Classification of Operations: SEE SCHEDULE ATTACHED
Estimated Annual Standard Premium: $48,708
Deposit Premium:
Including CIGA Surcharge of:
User Assessment Funding Fee:
Minimum Premium:
$7,363
$0
$67
$2,500
Adjustments of Premium Shall be Made: MONTHLY
Item 5: Limit of Liability for Coverage B - Employers' Liability: $1,000,000
SUBJECT TO ALL TERMS OF THIS POLICY HAVING REFERENCE THERETO.
Numbers of Endorsements Forming a Part of this Policy on its Effective Date:
WC200 WCO29 WC335 WC166A WC007 WC505A WC514
WC8382
Issued at: SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA Date of Issue: 28 JUL 92
Plan Name: PARTICIPATING - 1 YR Type Plan:
Agent: COMBS & STARKEY INS. SERVICES, INC. Code:
804 TOWN & COUNTRY RD. Renews Policy:
ORANGE CA 92668
P-1-1
01-05126/7.50
NEW
Countersigned by: Prepared By: 98/101
WC 17 (9/901
Insured's Copy
1.
NOVEMBER 6, 1992
VAN LINGEN TOWING
20621 EARL STREET
TORRANCE, CALIF. PHONE: 370-4533
HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
1315 VALLEY DRIVE
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
RE: POLICE TOWING CONTRACT
HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL,
ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION IS A REQUEST
TO AWARD A TOWING CONTRACT TO ONE OF TWO VENDORS.
A RECOMMENDATION OF THE POLICE DEPT TO AWARD THE CONTRACT
TO SCOTTO TOWING IS BASED ON FIVE ITEMS THAT ARE CLEARLY
INCORRECT, IRREVALANT, OR MISREPRESENTED.
ITEMS #1 AND #2 ARE IRREVALANT AS THE CONTRACT ONLY REQUIRES
THREE TRUCKS. IF A VENDER HAS THREE OR THREE HUNDRED IS NOT
THE ISSUE. WE AT VAN LINGEN TOWING CURRENTLY OPERATE FOUR
TIMES THE REQUIRED TRUCKS AND ARE MORE THAN CAPABLE TO
PROVIDE UNPARELLED SERVICE TODAY. WITHOUT NOTICE OR WARNING
THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE CALLED US LAST NIGHT,
NOVEMBER 5, AT APPROX 11:40 PM WHEN NO ONE ELSE COULD
RESPOND. WE WERE ON SCENE IN THE CITY OF DOWNEY WITHIN
23*MINUTES. THE CONTRACT REQUIRES 50 VEHICLE STORAGE SPACE.
WE OWN SPACE FOR OVER FOUR TIMES THE REQUIREMENT AND LEASE
SPACE FOR AN ADDITIONAL 400 FOR LONG TERM STORAGE.
ITEM # 3 DEALS WITH RATES. ALTHOUGH OUR BID RATE IS $27.00
MORE ON A SINGLE ITEM, THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH HAS HAD
"MAYBE ONLY ONE" REQUEST IN THE LAST 3 YEARS FOR THIS TYPE
OF HEAVY DUTY SERVICE. WHAT IS BLATANTLY OMITTED OR
MISREPRESENTED IS THE FACT THAT WE AT VAN LINGEN ARE THE LOW
QUALIFIED BIDDER OVERALL. OUR AVERAGE IS $40.77 VS SCOTTO'S
AVERAGE OF $47.86. NO MATTER HOW ANYONE MANIPULATES THE
INTENT, THE NUMBERS BID SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES !
ITEM 9k 4 DEALS WITH AND ATTEMPTS TO DOWN PLAY THE
CONSIDERABLE DISTANCE OF SCOTTO TOWING FROM HERMOSA BEACH.
VAN LINGEN IS 4 MILES, SCOTTO IS 8 . IF IT IS YOUR CAR IN
THE IMPOUND YARD, TOWED FROM A NO PARKING ZONE, AN
ADDITIONAL 4, UNNECESSARY MILES TO WALK OR PAY CAB FARE
FOR IS INTOLERABLE! THIS ADDITIONAL 100 % INCREASE IN
DISTANCE WILL COST UNTOLD DOLLARS TO THE CITY FOR
INVESTIGATORS TIME TO TRAVEL BACK AND FORTH FROM CITY HALL.
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
le
ITEM # 5 DEALS WITH TELETRAC. SIMPLY NOT REQUIRED OR
RECOMMENDED BY ANYONE ! IT IS A TOOL TO KEEP AN EYE ON
EMPLOYEES YOU CAN'T TRUST. WE EMPLOY PROFESSIONALS WHO CAN
RESPOND TO ANY LOCATION ON AN 8.1 MINUTE AVERAGE.
THE TOWING CONTRACT IS AN IMPORTANT ISSUE FOR HERMOSA BEACH.
VEHICLES AND PARKING ARE A PRIORITY HERE. VAN LINGEN
PROVIDED THE LOWEST. MOST CAPABLE BID FOR HERMOSA BEACH.
WHEN BOTH VENDORS ARE MORE THAN QUALIFIED, THE DECISION
SHOULD BE EASY. THE CLOSEST, CHEAPEST VENDOR MUST BE CHOSEN!
PLEASE CONTEMPLATE THIS LETTER, REVIEW THE BIDS AND MAKE
THE OBVIOUS DECISION.
I AM ABLE TO ANSWER ANY ADDITION QUESTIONS OR PROVIDE
ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION AT YOUR REQUEST.
SINCERELY YOURS,
db
h
ROBERT VAN LING
FACTS ABOUT:
FRANK SCOTTO TOWING
1750 W. 223RD STREET
TORRANCE, CA. 90501
(310) 787-0208
SUPPLEMENTAL � e
INFORMATION
INTRODUCTION
Frank Scotto Towing was established in 1974. Eighteen years later
we have one of the most advanced and professional towing services
in California.
Our towing facility and impound yard were newly built in 1987. It
has the capacity to house 300+ cars and our repair garage has 3
lube bays and is fully equipped to maintain our fleet of trucks.
Just completed in August of this year is an adjacent facility that
allows us to expand as our needs arise.
I take an active role in the day-to-day operations of my business.
I am a tow truck driver, a dispatcher, a mechanic, and the one who
oversees all facets of the business. I am available 24 hours 7
days a week. I have attended many classes about tow truck driving
and have trained over 300 drivers over the age of 18 years since f
have been in business. I attended El Camino College and graduated
with an AA degree in Business Administration. I continued on to
Long Beach State College while employed with Chevron Oil Company.
I attended many of their management schools which have been
beneficial to me over the years. I am currently on the Executive
Board of the L.A. Chapter of the California Tow Truck Association
and have given many seminars to help owners and drivers to be
professional on their job. I consider myself and my drivers to be
professionals in the business of towing and I will continue to try
to elevate the job of towing and vehicle recovery to a respected
profession.
Very sincerely,
Frank Scotto
WORK EXPERIENCE
In 1974 Frank Scotto Towing began with 1 tow truck. Today we have
26 towing vehicles. In 1976 I began my affiliation with the
Automobile Club of Southern California and in over 16 years of
service to the Club we have helped over 2,500 AAA members, on the
average, each and every month.
Our towing expertise extends to all areas of the towing business.
Of the 22 drivers employed at Frank Scotto Towing, 9 have over 5
years of service and another 6 have over 3 years of service to our
company. We are proud of the fact that we maintain a high-level of
employee loyalty and longevity. All the drivers have attended
training classes with AAA and many have received additional
training from the California Tow Truck Association. Many of these
classes are held in the conference room we have at our facility.
With all the different types of towing that we do, we can boast
that we have the best trained and most diversified group of
employees in the towing business.
All of our 26 tow trucks are fully equipped and are regularly
serviced by the 2 mechanics we have. All of our trucks have the
Tel -Trac locating system installed in them. This is just one of
the many state -of -the art systems we have.
Our impound lot is fully secured. A brick wall topped with barb
wire completely surrounds the entire facility. This wall also has
a perimeter alarm which will activate with any movement. The 24-
hour video cameras record all movements in and around the
facility.
Our business office is open from 7:00 am. to 7:00 pm. Monday
through Friday, 7:00 am. to 5:00 pm. on Saturdays, and from 10:00
am. to 3:00 pm. on Sunday. We have a 24-hour dispatch set-up. The
office staff consists of 7 full-time and 3 part-time employees who
provide all the support services that our drivers need. Our office
manager has been with us for over 10 years and she has the
authority to conduct business and make decisions on behalf of and
in the absence of the owner, Frank Scotto.
At Frank Scotto Towing our employees speak for the type of service
we provide, in a word, professional. They are the reason that we
provide the best possible towing service in the South Bay.
HIGHLIGHTED FACTS:
1. Because Frank Scotto Towing has 26 towing vehicles, all of
various sizes and capacities, we are able to respond to Police -
requested tows more quickly.
2. Because Frank Scotto Towing has a 24-hour dispatch system we
can respond to calls more efficiently.
3. Our hours of operation for releasing vehicles is Monday through
Friday from 7:00 am. to 7:00 pm., Saturday from 7:00 am. to 5:00
pm., and Sunday from 10:00 am. to 3:00 pm. These business hours
are longer than many other towing companies'.
4. In a survey compiled from records of a local beach city, it was
found that 75% of the Police -instigated towing we did for them was
for residents who lived outside of that city.
5. Because we have so many vehicles on the road each and every
day, we have been able to bid lower on this contract than our
competitors have.
RICHARD 1. DANGELO, MANAGER
TORRANCE DISTRICT OFFICE
(310) 3253111
Automobile Club of Southern California
2 6 0 6 SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD • TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA 9 0 5 0 5 2 9 9 7
MAILING ADDRESS. P.0 BOX 4 2 9 8 • TORRANCE. CALIFORNIA 9 0 5 1 0- 4 2 9 8
November 2, 1992
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
It has been my pleasure to be associated with Frank Scotto,
owner of Frank Scotto's Towing for over 17 years.
During our long association, Mr. Scotto has always provided
quality service. Frank can always be counted upon to provide
that "extra effort" when necessary.
Please feel free to contact me, for additional reference.
Sincerely,
Richard
Manager
Torrance District Office
3.
/47
Dangelo
LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
DARYL F. GATES
Chief of Police
February 27, 1992
Frank Scotto Towing
1750 West 223rd Street
Torrance, CA 90501
Dear Mr. Scotto:
TOM BRADLEY
Mayor
P. 0. Box 30158
Los Angeles, Calif. 90030
Telephone:
(213) 485-7418
Rera: 5.4
Friday, February 17 at approximately 1600 hours, South Traffic
Division's Officer Cy Hill answered a traffic accident call at
Sepulveda and Hil1Aa1e which involved one ofyour taw trucks.
Tom Clark and Aaron Arakaki, drivers in your employ, towed the
damaged Frank Scotto truck. Shortly,thetwo men returned to the
accident location where they eagerly axRisted Officer Hill in
clearing the accident. In addition, Clark and Arakaki helped. the
street maintenance crew toclear up a diesel fuel spill.. Thesemen
did not leave until the areawas safe.
On behalf of Officer. Hill and the Los Angeles Police Depca t.in iL, I
wish to express my appreciation to Tom. Clark and. Aaron Arakaki.
Their contribution. to keeping the streets of South Central Los
Angeles safe is also the primary goal of South Traffic' Division..
Very truly yours,
DARYL F. GATES
. M. WASSON, Captain
Commanding Officer
South Traffic Division
AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY — AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER Recyuaoieandmadeo-anrecycedwaste g1(:9
�x )� •-
L
HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMER
E
323 PIER AVENUE • P.O. BOX 404 4e41-4-P-
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254
(310) 376-0951 • FAX (310) 798-2594
October 31, 1992
Mayor Bob Essertier and City Council Members
City Hall/Civic Center
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Honorable Mayor and Council Members:
The Holiday season is fast approaching and the Chamber of Commerce
is planning events to make this another prosperous and festive
occassion.
To create goodwill and a worry free shopping atmosphere, we would
like to request that all silver posted meters in the VPD district
be bagged from December 1 to January 1, 1993 as we have done in the
past 10 years. We also request that two hour free parking be
allowed again. The Chamber will provide the bags.
This year once again, we are planning to have our annual Christmas
Mixer and Tree Lighting Ceremonies together as one event. On
Wednesday, December 2, from 5:00 to 8:00 pm, the festivities will
start with Santa setting up shop at Loreto Plaza for children's
holiday wishes. The rest of the outside ceremonies will consist of
an opening prayer, caroling from Hermosa Valley students and the
Mayor officially lighting up the downtown.
The remainder of the festivities will take place as a Mixer for the
business district in the Bank of America, 90 Pier Ave. from 6:00 to
8:00 pm.
We will need permission from the City Council to close Pier Ave.
from Hermosa Ave to Beach Drive on the above date between the
hours of 5:00 to 7:30 pm. We will also need eight to ten
barricades to block the flow of traffic in that area. The County
Lifeguards will monitor those barricades.
We look forward to your favorable consideration of these holiday
plans.
Sincerel,
'7?`J64117.14aCi
BJ Conte
Special Event Coordinator
4a
MNIENNEk
jm.•
r
Honorable Maypr and Members of the
Hermosa BeachICity Council
(CONTINUED FR?M THE 9/8/92 MEETING)
6-/ya -ss 3
//-/a , --
November 3, 1992
Regular Meeting of
November 10, 1992
SUBJECT: RECONSIDERATION OF
PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 91-5 AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-26
LOCATION: 125 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
APPLICANT/: JEREMY YEH
ARCHITECT 49 SOUTH CATALINA AVENUE
PASADENA, CA 91106
OWNER:
PURPOSE:
CHENG WEI CHEN AND TSAI YU-HSIU CHEN
339 WEST DUARTE ROAD
ARCADIA, CA 91007
TO RECONSIDEF)THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO
APPROVE A 70 -ROOM HOTEL WITH RETAIL, A RESTAURANT_
WITH ON -SALE ALCOHOL, AND A HOTEL COCKTAIL
LOUNGE/PIANO BAR WITH OUTDOOR SEATING.
Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation
Adopt the attached resolution to sustain the decision of the
Planning Commission to approve the project, subject to the
conditions as contained in P.C. Resolution 92-48.
Alternative
Approve the request with modifications to the Planning Commission
imposed conditions relating to wall height and/or building
height.
Background
The Planning Commission, at their meeting of October 6, 1992,
considered these items, and also some additional plans submitted
by the applicant representing the height of an 18 -foot wall, and
the effect on the exterior appearance if the building is reduced
to 35 feet in height.
At their meeting of September 8, 1992, the City Council held a
public hearing on the reconsideration of the 70 -room hotel
project. The Council voted 3:2 to refer the issue back to the
Planning Commission to report back on the issues of requiring a
higher wall of up to 18 feet and also in regards to the issue of
grandfathering this project to a height greater than 35 feet.
The Planning Commission voted 5:0 to approve the requested
hotel/restaurant project at their meeting of August 4, 1992.
Please refer to the attached updated chronology for further
background. Additional background information is available on
file in the Planning Department.
Analysis
Please refer to the attached October 6, 1992, Planning Commission
staff report for additional discussion on the issues of wall
height and building height, and the outdoor seating incorporated
into the piano bar.
In sum, the Planning Commission does not support a wall any
higher than 12 feet, since that extra height is not necessary,
and because landscaping is preferable to a higher wall. Further,
the Commission does not support lowering of the building height
to 35 -feet, citing the City Attorney's position on the issue and
noting that it would negatively impact the appearance of the
hotel.
The only new information regarding the hotel are the questions in
the attached supplemental letters from concerned neighbors.
Staff has responded to these questions in the attached memos to
the City Manager. _)
U J
Michael Schubach
Plan 'ng Directgtr
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager
en Robertson
Associate Planner
Attachments
1. Proposed resolution sustaining the P.C. decision
2. P.C. Resolution 92-48
2. P.C. Staff Report and minutes 10/6/92
3. C.C. Minutes 9/8/92
4. Updated chronology
5. Excerpt of minutes of May 5, 1992
6. Photographs of wall
7. Supplemental letters and questions with staff's responses
Additional information such as previous staff reports and
previous plans are on file in the Planning Department
a/pcsr125
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO
APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
A SEVENTY (70) UNIT HOTEL WITH RETAIL, A RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE
ALCOHOL AND A HOTEL PIANO BAR/COCKTAIL LOUNGE WITH ON -SALE
GENERAL ALCOHOL
WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on September
8, 1992, and November 10, 1992, to reconsider the Planning
Commission approval of the above project and made the following
findings:
A. The project is co•,sistent with applicable general and
specific plans;
B. The site is zoned Specific Plan Area No. 7 and is suitable
for the type and density of the proposed development;
C. The development, as conditioned by the Planning Commission,
will pose no threat to the public safety and welfare;
D. Design of the proposed project is compatible and consistent
with applicable elements of the City's General Plan and with
E.
the guidelines of Specific Plan Area No. 7;
An environmental assessment has been conducted,
proposed project, with the incorporation c
conditions by the Planning Commission, causes
and the
mitigating
a less than
significant environmental impact, and qualifies for a
negative declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby sustain the
Planning Commission decision to approve a Precise Development
Plan, and Conditional Use Permit at 125 Pacific Coast Highway,
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
and adopt an Environmental Negative Declaration subject to the
conditions of Planning Commission Resolution 92-48.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of
1992.
PRESIDENT of the ,City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNE
p/ccrs125
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION P.C. 92-48
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A
70 -ROOM HOTEL BUILDING WITH ANCILLARY RETAIL, RESTAURANT AND A
PIANO BAR, AND APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW
ON -SALE ALCOHOL IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE RESTAURANT AND AT THE BAR
AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 125
PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 THROUGH 6
INCLUSIVE, LOTS 7 AND 8, TRACT 5019, AND LOT 142, WALTER RANSOM
COMPANY'S VENABLE PLACE
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on May
5, June 16, and August 4, 1992, to receive oral and written
testimony regarding a Precise Development Plan for a 70 -room
Hotel with ancillary uses at 125 Pacific Coast Highway and made
the following findings: J.
A. The project is consistent with applicable general and
specific plans;
B. The site is zoned Specific Plan Area No. 7 and is suitable
for the type and density of the proposed development;
C. The development, as conditioned below, will pose no threat to
the public safety and welfare;
D. Design of the proposed project is compatible and consistent
with applicable elements �f the City's General Plan and
the guidelines of Specific Plan Area No. 7;
An environmental assessment has been conducted,
with
E• and the
proposed project, with the incorporation of mitigating
conditions below, will cause a less than significant
environmental impact.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
of the City'of Hermosa Beach, California, does he;.,eby approve a
Precise Development Plan, and Conditional Use Permit at 125
Pacific Coast Highway, and.. adopts an Environmental Negative
Declaration, subject to the following conditions:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECTION I - Conditions regarding the Precise Development Plan
1. The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance
with submitted preliminary plans received July 21, 1992, and
reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 4, 1992. Any
minor modification shall be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Director.
2. The subject lots to be developed shall be merged together,
pursuant to Section 29.5-29, prior to the issuance of
building permits
3. A twelve -foot high decorative block wall shall be provided
along the entire length of the westerly property line, with
the finished size and type of material to be approved by the
Planning Commission.
4. The landscaping strip along the east property line shall be a
minimum of 5 feet wide.
5. Three (3) copies of a revised landscaping plan indicating
size, type, and quan',ity of plant materials (including trunk
diameter at planting time) shall be submitted to the Planning
Commission for review and approval prior to the issuance of
Building Permits.
a. An automatic landscape irrigation system shall be
provided, and shall be shown on plans.
b. Landscaping shall be provided along the length of the
east property line in accordance with landscape plan.
A minimum of one 24 -inch size specimen tree shall be
planted for every 10 feet of length.
6. Architectural treatment shall be as shown on building
elevations and any modification shall require approval by the
Planning Director.
a. Samples of proposed exterior materials as identified on
submitted elevations shall be supplied to the
satisfaction of the Planning Commission for review and
approval by the Planning Commission prior to use of such
materials on the building, and prior to issuance of
building permits.
7. A grading plan shall be reviewed at the time of Building Plan
Check and shall be consistent with the submitted plans to the
satisfaction of the Building Director.
8. Any satellite dish and/or similar equipment shall comply with
the requirements of Section 1227 of the Zoning Ordinance.
9. The project shall comply with the following r:,quirements of
the Public Works Department:
(a) Dedicate a 27 -foot return radius at the corner of First
Street and P.C.H..
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(b) Dedicate a 27 -foot return radius at the corner of First
Place and P.C.H.
(c) Relocate street light poles as required
(d) Construct new curb, gutter and sidewalk
(d) Reconstruct new 6" A.C. over 12" A.B. out to centerline
of First Place and First Street
(e) All utilities shall be placed underground
(f)
On-site drainage not permitted across sidewalk
10. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Fire
Department as contained in their letter dated December 24,
1991, and attached herewith.
11. A lighting plan shall be submitted which clearly demonstrates
that the glare from all lighting fixtures will be effectively
hidden from the view of the residential area to the west.
This shall be accomplished by locating the fixtures below the
level of the propertv)line wall or by hiding the lights in a
manner satisfactory to the Planning Commission.
12. Overall signage shall be consistent with the sign locations
depicted on the submitted elevations.
a. A separate overall concept sign plan including information
as to types, color, and size of lettering shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Planning
Commission prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
b. Final detailed sign plans, consistent with the concept
plan approved by the Planning Commission, including
structural information shall be approved by the Director
of Building and Safety prior to the issuance of sign
permits.
c. Any minor modification ' of the sign plan shall is subject
to review and approval by the Planning Director, while
significant changes require approval by the. Planning
Commission.
13. The project shall comply with the requirement of the
California Department of Transportation pursuant to their
letter to Mr. Hui Lai, dated February 24, 1992.
14. Pursuant to the recommendations contained in the submitted
Acoustical Analysis of Thru-the-Wall Air Conditioning Units,
the air conditioning units shall be installed inside the room
venting out through sheet metal louvers. Further, pursuant
to the recommendation on page 6 of said report the units
shall be installed inside enclosures lined with 1-1/2 inch
thickness of Johns Manville LinAcoustic-R, on Mason HD
Vibration Isolators, or comparable materials.
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15. Plans depicting landscaping, lighting, wall materials, and
signing, and examples of exterior materials, pursuant to
condtions 3, 5, 6, 11a, and 12 shall be submitted to the
Planning Commission for review and approval prior to approval
of building permits.
16. Within six (6) months of the date of approva
development plan, permittee and/or owner(s)
shall apply for a building permit and shall
construction drawings therefore, to the City.
17. Final building plans/construction drawings
elevation, floor plan, sections, details,
irrigation, and a sign plan submitted for
issuance shall be reviewed for consistency
plans approved by the Planning Commission,
the Planning Director prior to the issuance
Permit.
1 of the precise
of the property
submit complete
including site,
landscaping and
building permit
with the final
and approved by
of any Building
SECTION II Conditions regarding the operation of the on -sale
alcohol establishments:
1. The establishment shall not adversely effect the welfare .of
the residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby.
2. The business shall provide adequate staffing, management and
supervisory techniques to prevent loitering, unruliness, and
boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business in
the parking areas.
3. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the
limitations prescribed by the city's noise ordinance and
shall not create a nuisance to surrounding residential
neighborhoods, and/or commercial establishments.
4. A sign shall be posted conspicuously and prominently at all
exits warning patrons who purchase any and all types of
alcoholic beverages that "possession and/or consumption of
alcoholic beverages in any public sidewalk, parking lot,
beach, and/or any public place is prohibited by law and
subject to citation and fine. The City of Hermosa Beach
vigorously enforces its liquor laws" Said signs shall be at
least 12" X 14", shall be printed in a large type and
permanently maintained.
5. An employee who is aware of the conditions of this
conditional use permit shall be on the premises during
business hours.
(a) The conditional use permit conditions shall be placed on
the property in a location where employees can easily
read the conditions.
6. The police chief may determine that a continuing police
problem exists, and may.. require the presence of a police
approved doorman and/or security personnel.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7. The exterior of the premises including the parking area shall
be maintained in a neat and clean manner at all times.
SECTION III
This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the
permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at
the office of the Department of Planning their affidavits stating
that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the
conditions of this grant.
The Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan shall be
recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the
Planning Department.
Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if any
of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court
of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and
enforceable.
Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its
agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the Cj)y or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which
action is brought within the applicable time period of Government
Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee
of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate
fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the
permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City
fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not
thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless
the City.
The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and
attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result
of any claim or action brought against the City because of this
grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in
an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at
its own expense in the defense of the action, but such
participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation
under this condition.
The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated
in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law,
statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any
development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the
permittee to cease any development or activity not in full
compliance shall be a violation of these conditions.
The Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan shall
automatically expire within one (1) year of the date of approval
of said entitlements unless permittee and/or owner(s) have
commenced construction of the project, unless an extension to
said time period has been granted by the Planning C.,jmmission.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
SECTION IV
The Planning Commission may review this Precise Development Plan
and Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions
or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate
detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the
subject use.
VOTE: AYES: Comms.Di Monda,Marks,Oakes,Suard,Chmn.Merl
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 92-48 is a true
and complete record of the action taken by the Planning
Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their
regular meeting of august 4, 1992.
Rod Merl, Chairman
e gZ Date
Michael`Schubach, Secretary
a/persl25
C 1,
Honorable Chairman and Members of the
Hermosa Beach Planning Commission
August 27, 1992
Regular Meeting of
October 6, 1992
(REFERRED BACK FROM THE CITY COUNCIL FOR REVIEW AND. COMMENT)
SUBJECT: RECONSIDERATION OF
PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 91-5 AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91-26
LOCATION: 125 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
APPLICANT/: JEREMY YEH
ARCHITECT 49 SOUTH CATALINA AVENUE
PASADENA, CA 91106
OWNER: CHENG WEI CHEN AND TSAI YU-HSIU CHEN
339 WEST DUARTE ROAD
ARCADIA, CA 91007
PURPOSE: TO REVIEW ANr)COMMENT ON REFERRALS FROM THE CITY
COUNCIL REGARDING THE HEIGHT OF THE EAST PROPERTY
LINE WALL AND HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING, AND;
TO AUTHORIZE OUTDOOR SEATING IN CONJUNCTION WITH
THE PIANO BAR
Recommendation
To recommend that the City Council sustain the decision of the
Planning Commission to approve the project subject to the
conditions as contained in the P.C. Resolution 92-48, including
the Commission's decision to require a 12 -foot wall along the
easterly property line.
Alternative
Recommend that the building be reduced to a maximum height of 35
feet.
Background
At their meeting of September 8, 1992, the City Council held a
public hearing on the reconsideration of the 70 -room hotel
project. The Council's final action, by a 3:2 vote was to refer
the issue back to the Planning Commission to report back on the
issues of requiring a higher wall of up to 18 feet and also in
regards to the issue of grandfathering this project to a height
greater than 35 feet.
At their meeting of August 4, 1992, the Planning Commission voted
5:0 to approve the requested hotel/restaurant project subject to
conditions. This was the fifth Planning_Commission hearing where
public testimony was heard and/or the subject project was
discussed.
1. 0
Please refer to the attached updated chronology for further
background. Additional background information is available on
file in the Planning Department.
Analysis
WALL HEIGHT
The plans show an eight -foot high wall on the easterly property
line to be used in conjunction with trees to buffer the project
from the residential area to the west. The Planning Commission
added a condition to required a twelve (12) foot high wall.
In comparison, the existing building wall (the back wall of the
previous auto repair bays) measures 16 feet in height from the
grade of the residential property at 720 First Place, and
measures 18.5 feet from the grade__of the parking lot at 719 First
Street. The size of these walls is rather striking (see the
attached photographs) and if a similar size free-standing wall is
installed in its place it will have an impact on the overall
appearance of the hotel from the west and also from both the
north and south perspectives.
In staff's judgement an 18 -foot height wall would defeat the
purpose of the setback requirement as the result is a wall
equivalent in size and appearance to a two-story building right
on the property line. Further, the structural requirements to
build such a large free-standing wall would require the wall to
be rather wide at the base (at least 12") and would require
substantial footings and/or support columns at certain intervals. ^'
These structural features, although feasible, are expensive, and_l`
would potentially hinder the tree planting and growing area;kthe
visual impacts could be mitigated by requiring climbing vines,
and the use of decorative materials to soften the impact of such
a large wall.
BUILDING HEIGHT
As the Commission is aware, the proposed roof of the structure
exceeds 35 -feet high (at the southwest portion of the building)
by a maximum of about 3 feet, which is inconsistent with current
law which allows a maximum of 35 feet in the SPA 7 zone. The
Commission, however, based on the advise of the City Attorney
from the meeting of May 5, 1992, allowed the proposed height to
be grandfathered.
In considering the option of lowering the building to a maximum
height of 35 feet, a potentially negative side effect would be
that the proposed pitched roof element, which is a positive
attribute in the overall design of the structure, would have to
either have a much lower pitch or be a flat roof. The attached
drawings depict the applicant's proposed alternative of lowering
the height.
OUTDOOR SEATING IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PIANO BAR
When the concept of the third floor piano bar was first discussed
with the Planning Department, the plans showed the bar on the
west side of the building facing the ocean with an outdoor patio
c C
area. Based on concerns about noise impacts to the west, staff
suggested relocating the bar, perhaps on the east side.
On their next submittal, the piano bar was moved to the east
side, adjacent to a balcony overlooking P.C.H. and the balcony
has been included in the floor area calculations which determined
the parking requirements for the building. Only on the final
submittal was outdoor seating specifically identified. Pursuant
to the zoning code the outdoor seating area should be authorized
as part of the C.U.P. To clarify that this was intended to be
authorized, and to provide the public opportunity to discuss this
issue, staff has thus publicly noticed outdoor seating for
official authorization at this meeting.
Given that the outdoor seating area is on the P.C.H. side,
completely covered, and will be surrounded by a 3 -foot high solid
railing with an additional 1.5 foot glass extension, and arch
supports, staff does not see any problems with allowing this
outdoor seating. Alternatively the Commission could require
enclosure of this area, or modify the conditions to limit the
hours of the outdoor seating. Enclosure of this area could be
easily accomplished by adding windows, which could be opened and
closed.
CONCUR: /
Michael Schubach
Planning Director
Attachments
1. Resolution 92-48
2. Updated chronology
3. Excerpt of minutes of May 5, 1992
4. Photographs of wall
'Ken Robertson
Associate Planner
Additional information such as previous staff reports and
previous plans are on file in the Planning Department
a/pcsr125
C mm. Di Monda requested Staff assure the landscaping ips
a le and the block wall be the same finish as the build -
in Comm. Oakes suggested landscaping continue across
the ront and be planted with a specific "bushy" plan/t.:
MOTION .,;by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Marrs, to
APPROVE\application CUP 92-13 and PDP 92-8 with the
changes to the rear block wall and landscaping. /
AYES: Comm.
NOES: None
ABSENT: \Comm. Suard
ABSTAIN: None
Di Monda, Marks, Oakes, Chmn. Merl
Chmn. Merl stated this application had" been approved;
subject to appeal within 10 days to the City Council.
\\ /
CUP 92-12 & PARK 92-5 -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND
PARKING PLAN AMENDMENT.':' TO ALLOW ON -SALE BEER AND WINE IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRON-
MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 3714TH STREET, LA PLAYITA
At 7:41 p.m., Chmn. Merl reopened the Public Hearing.
Harold Cohen, applicant, apologized for being late. Comm.
Di Monda suggested a licensed person sign the drawing, to
which Mr. Cohen agreed. 'Comm.\ Marks expressed concern
regarding the open area'leading\ to the bathrooms. Mr.
Cohen responded he had no other option and had a five -feet
high fence for security purposes. \
No one else wished to/speakregarding this item, and Chmn.
Merl closed the Public Hearing at 7:45'p. m.
MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by \Comm. Oakes, to
APPROVE CUP 92-12 & PARK 92-8 with the•• condition the
drawings must be signed by a licensed professional.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Comm. Di Monda, Marks, Oakes, Chinn. Merl
None
Comm. Suard
None
Chmn. erl stated this application had been approved;
subj t to appeal within 10 days to the City Council: \'
Du /to the number of audience participants, Items 9 an
w re switched on the agenda, with Commission consent. \
CUP 91-26 & PDP 91-5 -- CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL BACK TO
PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A 70 -ROOM HOTEL TO RECONSIDER THE
HEIGHT OF A BUFFER WALL AND BUILDING HEIGHT AT 125 PACIFIC
COAST HIGHWAY.
P.C. Minutes 10-6-92
Recommended Action: To sustain Planning Commission
approval.
Mr. Schubach discussed the background of this item,
including the applicant's notification that he wished
outdoor seating in conjunction with the piano bar be
considered and the Commission's decision to require a
12 -feet wall on the property. He discussed •the
alternatives available and the City Council's and
Commissions's previous actions. He stated if a tall,
free-standing wall were to be installed, it would impact
the appearance of the hotel; an 18 -foot high wall would be
equivalent to a two-story building at the property line,
with a wide base, substantial footings or support columns.
Based upon the advice of the City Attorney, the Commission
had allowed the proposed height to be grandfathered. He
stated if the design were decreased to a height of 35
feet, the roof would have a lower pitch or be flat. Also,
the applicant had reldcated the bar due to the noise
factor and had identified the outdoor seating area. Mr.
Schuhach noted that Staff did not see a problem with the
outdoor seating area, but the Commission might wish the
area enclosed. Chmn. Merl clarified that the wall and
building heights were being considered at this meeting.
Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Merl at 7:56 p.m.
Jeremy Yeh, 49 So. Catalina Ave., Pasadena, presented a
building elevation drawing, stated the design was an
excellent one and the status structure would draw "high-
class" customers. He felt it was illogical to invest the
necessary large amount of money in a badly designed
building, which would result if the roof were lowered.
His investors would not invest in such a project. He
stated the economy and real estate market is poor,
explaining the hotel business would be only a projected
60% occupancy and the other on-site businesses were nec-
essary for success. Mr. Jeh felt views would not be
blocked and stated if the wall were required to be taller,
the business would fail, since hotel occupants did not
come to look at a wall. Comm. Marks noted the rooms did
not face the ocean. Mr. Yeh stated a view was available
to the rooms.
Pam McHew, 718 1st Place, stated the Commission should not
allow the project, noting many excellent hotels already
exist within the City. She supported the higher wall to
assure privacy for the neighbors, decrease noise levels
and maintain property values. She discussed the applic-
able ordinance and a petition signed by 49 people, stating
she and others would stop the project as their neighbor-
P.C. Minutes 10-6,92
-IS-
hood would be "wrecked" if the project goes through.
Comm. Oakes confirmed with Ms. McHew that Ms. McHew had
purchased three of her four properties while knowing they
were adjacent to commercial properties. Ms. McHew
discussed with Comm. Oakes the existing separation wall,
proposed business, the possibility of other commercial
businesses and their impacts. Comm. Oakes noted the
structural requirements of an 18 -feet high wall and stated
her preference for landscaping rather than such a wall.
Comm. Di Monda stated Ms. McHew was requesting the
Commission" deny the project based upon discretionary
power. He asked what the reaction would be if the
Commission exercised discretionary power relating to her
properties. She stated this had already happened to her.
Comm. Di Monda stated her property could be impacted in
the future if the Commission chose to use "its discretion-
ary power."
Jerry Newton, 2041 Circ-�l e Drive, stated he lost property
rights through downzonLng, noting it was unique to have
commercial and residential properties side-by-side. . He
stated residents were vocal and acted as "de facto" for
the Zoning Board or Planning Commission, noting it was not
appropriate for residents to try to stop development
within the commercial area. He supported Staff's recom-
mendation, opposed Ms. McHew's statements and urged
approval by the Commission.
Gary Waylon, property owner within Hermosa Beach, stated
his approval of the Commission's actions and the City of
Commerce's endorsement of the project. He stated business
will listen to the community through the dollar vote.
Rick Learned, 1727 Monterey, stated the business community
supported this project, stated satisfaction with the Comm-
ission's previous actions and noted support of the
project.
John Bowler, 833 Hermosa Avenue, Chairman of Hermosa Beach
Restaurant and Tavern Owners Assoc., commended the Commis-
sion on the thoroughness and thought that had went into
the project and thanked the Commission for its change in
the manner of handling of business within the City. He
stated new businesses should be welcomed.
Patricia Spiritus, 115 Longfellow, stated her support of
the project.
No one else wished to speak regarding this item, and Chmn.
Merl closed the Public Hearing at 8:29 p.m.
Comm. Di Monda addressed the issues requested by the City
Council relating to (1) the City Attorney's position, (2)
P.C. Minutes 10-6-92
height limit (noting the applicant had lowered the height
limit resulting in Comm. Di Monda's dissatisfaction with
the building's appearance), (3) 18 -feet high wall (of
which he was not convinced was necessary and would not use
discretionary power to impose that requirement) and (4)
stated he did not feel the Commission should act as an
economic Board as the success or failure of a business did
not relate to Planning Commission decisions. He supported
Staff's recommendation. Comms. Marks and Oakes also sup-
ported Staff's recommendation.
MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Oakes, • to
APPROVE Staff's recommendation to sustain Planning
Commission approval.
AYES: Comm. Di Monda, Marks, Oakes, Chmn. Merl
NOES: None
ABSENT: Comm. Suard
ABSTAIN: None .}
Chmn., Merl stated the Commission's action reconfirmed its
original decision on the items sent for reconsideration.
SSt 92-8 -- SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT OF SECTIO{Q
10 REGARDING STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR ON -SALE AND OFF -SALE
ALCOHOL ESTABLISHMENTS AND REVISE THE STANDARD CONDITIONS
OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS.
Recommended Action: To recommend approval of,/text amend-
ment
Mr. Schubach stated this study was to p6nsider amendment
to Section 10-7 and`10-8 and to change/mandated conditions
within Article 10. He..discussed the background and the
proposed draft relating'to the aldohol amendment; with a
distance of 100 feet from r,e'sidents as the minimum
requirement, prohibition of �a'Ycohol sales with gasoline
sales, and the Commission's,approval being necessary prior
to the Police Chief's zfequiiement of a doorman at
establishments. Staff ecommanded-,minimum standard pro-
visions for other conditionally permitted uses be changed
to recommended conditions. Comm. Oakes discussed the
Police Chief's response to the suggested`amendment change
relating to hisZauthority with Mr. Schubach. Comm. Di
Monda noted -fiat this change would allow the City to
review C.U.. revocation based upon problems brought forth
by the ne-essity of a doorman being required. Comm. Di
Monda n• ed the way the amendment was written, the'•busin-
ess o er would be deprived of procedural due processy, to
whi Comm. Oakes agreed.
ublic Hearing opened by Chmn. Merl_at 8:42 p.m.
P.C. Minutes 10-6-92
B4cKCRavND
M4 iFR/AL
c
c
M ion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried,
not ng the dissenting votes of Midstokke and MayoVEs-
serti'er. Councilmember Midstokke requested that/it be
noted that this action did not affect the right of the
people to .referendum on the item.
At 9:15 P.M. Councilmehaber Wiemans moved for a five minute re-
cess. The motion failed'due to the lack of a,,second. The order
of the agenda was suspendect`to go to the public hearings starting
at item no. 5. \
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE `CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION.
Action: Items 1(j)„( 1c) , and ) were continued to the
meeting of September'22, 1992.
V
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS.
(a) Letter from Board of Parking Place Commissioners dated
August -5, 1992 regarding year-end revenue'sand expendi-
ture eport of VPr,
em 4(a) was continued to the meeting of September 2
1992.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
5. REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
DECISION ALLOWING CONSTRUCTION OF A 70 -ROOM HOTEL WITH
RETAIL, A RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL, AND A
PIANO BAR WITH ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AT 125 PACIFIC
COAST HIGHWAY, with resolution for adoption. Memorandum
from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated August 27,
1992. Supplemental letter from Robert and Debi Ottiger,
719 1/2 First Place, dated September 7, 1992.
Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report
and responded to Council questions.
The public hearing opened at 9:35 P.M. Coming forward to address
the Council on this item were:
Gary Werner - representing the hotel developers,
stated that every effort had been made to
respond and comply with concerns from the resi-
dents and the City; displayed renderings of the
proposed hotel; responded to Council questions;
Jeremy Yeh - architect for the project, responded
to Council questions; and,
Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, Planning
Commission member, responded to Council ques-
tions regarding the Planning Commission deci-
sion to grandfather the height of the project.
City Council Minutes 09-08-92 Page 7928
—/g
c
City Attorney Vose advised the Council that it was inap-
propriate to ask questions that assumed a response from
Mr. Di Monda for the entire Planning Commission.
Continuing to come forward to address the Council on this item
were:
Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, thanked
Councilmembers Midstokke and Wiemans for ap-
pealing the Planning Commission decision; ques-
tioned the City policy regarding changes to the
project and grandfathering the height limit;
requested to speak beyond the time limit.
Proposed Action: To allow Mr. Longacre additional time
to speak.
Motion Wiemans, second Midstokke. The motion failed due
to the dissenting votes of Benz, Edgerton, and Mayor
Essertier.
Continuing to come forward to address the Council on this item
were:
Wilma Burt "j- 1552 Seventh Street, questioned
omission of Planning Commission minutes from_
January 9th, height grandfathering, and notic-
ing to residents;
Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., questioned
traffic pattern for ingress and egress;
Jan McHugh - 718 First Place, objected to 12 foot
wall, wants the 18 foot wall to remain as a
buffer for privacy and noise, submitted photos;
opposed to the project regardless of any
modifications that might be made;
Richard Laraba - 705 First Street, requested that
flags be placed to show a 35 foot height on the
project site and that a traffic plan be
submitted;
Don Karasevicz - 840 15th Street, questioned dis-
cretionary handling of project and impact on
the neighborhood;
Sonia Nichols - 703 First Street, questioned
ineffective communication and resident notic-
ing; opposed to hotel use;
Georgia Jones - 715 First Street, requested that
the wall be at least 18 feet high; objected to
the bar included in the project;
Ramon Divorski - Second Street, spoke on traffic
and parking problems; questioned routing;
Sid Colby - 719 First Place, concerned about the
restaurant and the piano bar; questioned the
hours of operation and parking on the street;
opposed to the hotel;
Jim Parkman - 657 Porter Lane, stated the City has
a transient problem and does not need a hotel;
questioned the secrecy of this project;
John McHugh - 718 First Place, spoke on the vacancy
City Council Minutes 09-08-92 Page 7929
-19-
rate at other hotels in the City; spoke in op-
position to this project;
Carolyn Colby - 719 First Place, spoke in opposi-
tion to the hotel due to the congestion in the
area and lack of privacy;
Jo Lucia --720 1/2 First Place, requested that the
wall stay at 18 feet;
Mark Hansen - 926 First Street, concerned about
traffic in the area and the impact on the
neighborhood;
Fred Nichols - First Street, questioned the traffic
survey, street closures and the amount of hotel
parking;
Gary Werner - representing the hotel developers,
responded to questions that had been raised by
residents; stated there were 113 parking places
for the hotel for 71 rooms and a staff of ap-
proximately 20 per shift which would leave 22
extra spaces if the hotel were full;
Jeremy Yeh - architect for the hotel, stated the
wall would have to come down as it was part of
a buildijg that would have to be demolished;
stated that trees would be planted in order to
provide privacy both for the residents and the
hotel guests; (Planning Director Schubach noted
that the final landscape plan would have to
come before the Planning Commission);
Roy Judd - (no address given), objected to the
project even though he lives in the northern
part of the City;
Susan Ochoa - 126 Eighth Street, questioned the
ability of the Police and Fire Departments to
respond in an emergency; and,
Johnnie Bruce - (no address given), spoke in
opposition to the project.
The public hearing closed at 11:05 P.M. .f
Proposed Action: To sustain the decision of.the Plan-
ning Commission to approve the project subject to the
conditions as contained in the Planning Commission
Resolution No. 92-48 and to adopt a Council Resolution.
Motion Benz, second Mayor Essertier. The motion failed
due to the dissenting votes of Edgerton, Midstokke, and
Wiemans.
Action: To return the item to the Planning Commission
to review the issue of the wall height and roof height,
with public notice given.
Motion Edgerton, second Wiemans. The motion carried,
noting the dissenting votes of Benz and Mayor Essertier.
At 11:30 P.M.yCouncilmember Wiemans moved for a five minute re-
cess. The motion was seconded by Edgerton and the meeting re-
cessed at 11:31 P.M.
City Council Minutes 09-08-92 Page 7930
_ -Zo
CHRONOLOGY RE. 125 P.C.H. HOTEL
7/2/91 - Original submittal, "Holiday Inn Express" 71 -room , no
restaurant -near 40' high in rear.
7/18/91 - Staff Env. Review Committee - continued for applicant to
submit traffic study.
8/1/91 - Traffic study received - circulated for review.
10/3/91 - Staff Env. Review Committee - 71 -unit - no restaurant - 40'
high. Staff recommends Negative Declaration with mitigation.
10/7/91 - Revised plans submitted then circulated, still 71-unit/no
restaurant.
11/5/91 - Proposition I passes to lower height in C-3 and Specific Plan
Area (SPA) zones to 35 feet.
11/19/91 - 1st scheduled Planning Commission hearing on 71 -unit proposal
& continued to 12/3/91 at request of applicant (outstanding
Caltrans & Public Works issues).
12/3/91 - Planning Commission hearing - continued at request of
applicant to 1/7/92 (still no Caltrans comments; considering
re -design).
12/18/91 - Received revised plan, 64 -units with attached restaurant
(still designed to 40' high in rear) pool located in rear
north of building; also revised traffic study received -
plans circulated for review.
1/7/92 - P.C. hearing - staff recommends continuance based on
outstanding traffic issues, no CalTrans comments and pool
location - plans discussed at hearing - P. C. continues to
2/18/92 based on staff recommendations - also P.C. requests
Attorney's opinion on whether 40 -foot height is grandfathered
and requests survey of residents on First Place.
1/22/92 - Meeting in Planning Department at developer request.Present:
applicant and his architect, Michael Schubach, Ken Robertson,
Joe DiMonda, Robert Essertier. Applicant shows new sketches
- better view orientation, no access on First Place, addition
of cocktail lounge with sun deck, relocation of pool to
south, general suggestions made by staff and J.D. and R.E. in
regards to possible design improvements
2/12/92 - Meeting held in Planning Department at developer request.
Present: architect, Michael Schubach, Ken Robertson, Joe
DiMonda, Robert Essertier. Applicant shows refined new
concept, only suggestions made are about details and
discussion or remaining process, applicant reminded that P.C.
still waiting for Attorney's opinion regarding height issue.
2/18/92 - P.C. hearing - continue to April 7, 1992 at request of
applicant for more time to finalize new concept.
2/24/92 - Comments received from CalTrans, no objections to project,
and notes acceptance of one access from P.C.H.
C C
4/7/92 - Revised plans received, 70 -room hotel with piano bar and deck
at third floor and attached restaurant (still 40' high in
rear) and P.C.H. as only access
5/5/92 - P.C. hearing - Staff recommends conditional approval,
Attorney states 40' height OK to grandfather, P.C. continues
project to 6/16/92 and requests information on several items,
including revisions regarding landscaping, trash dumpsters.
6/16/92 - P.C. hearing - P.C. continues to 8/4/92, because no revised
plans submitted. P.C. hears staff's response to previously
noted concerns
7/21/92 - Revised Plans received - minor changes to address
landscaping, trash dumpster location
8/4/92 - P.C. hearing - P.C. approves project subject to conditions
including 12' high wall, the return of sign plans, landscape
plans, material samples, etc.
9/8/92 - C.C. hearing on reconsideration of P.C. decision - referred
back to the P.C. to review and comment on increasing wall
height and the grandfathering of the building height
p/king
( C
Recommended Action: To approve said Precise Development Plan and
Conditional Use Permit, and adoption of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration.
Mr. Schubach stated Staff recommended approval of the 70 -room
hotel, restaurant with on -sale alcohol and piano bar. ,He stated
the grandfather clause which allows a 40 -feet height 'will soon
terminate and an eight -foot high west side wall would require
noticing since the original plans displayed a six -feet 'wall. Mr.
Schubach described the proposed hotel, parking spaces and
accommodations, including structure position, square footage --and
height measurements as noted in the revised plans.
Mr. Schubach stated this project is subject to the Precise
Development Plan requirements. He stated a determination has not
been received by Staff as to whether the project had been__
"grandfathered" or not, but the City Attorney would discuss this
subject. Staff recommended tandem parking stalls be identified
for employee parking. Mr.lSchubach observed that the revised plans
were reviewed for consistency with the guidelines, noting the
project was designed to scale, the pool area was relocated, a
sauna/work out room is still located on the westerly side of the
property which Staff suggested should be relocated by the pool, the
project extends to 35 feet only at the P.C.H. frontage, ranging
from 32 to 40 feet elsewhere. He discussed the efforts to decrease
the appearance of bulk, landscaping plans and buffering of noise by
both walls and plants. CalTrans' requirements and comments have
been incorporated in the plans with the exception of wheelchair
ramps, which is a condition of approval. He also discussed
CalTrans' response to the City's traffic engineer's inquiries.
Mr. Schubach stated the plans do not include all the details to
enable a final approval of Precise Development Plan, the Resolution
of approval includes conditions requiring submittal of required
details to the Commission for approval. He noted a reduction in
height may alter the plan, but Staff felt enough information had..
been provided to the Commission to enable a decision at this time.'
He then stated the Commission's alternatives.
Mr. Lee explained his position regarding the grandfather clause by
stating a review of Ordinance 91-063 (providing a grandfather
clause and lowered structure height to a maximum of 30 feet),
resulted in the determination that a complete package has been
submitted to the City by the applicant prior to November 5, 1991.
Additionally, by use of the discretionary permit process, changes
and revisions were suggested and requested by the City and made by
the applicant. Mr. Lee stated the application of this Ordinance is
a discretionary call by the Commission and addresses whether or not
the most recently submitted plans are a logical extension of the
original plans submitted prior to November 5, 1991.
Mr. Lee stated the next issue for the Commission's decision was
whether or not the deadline provided in_the grandfather clause
P.C.Minutes 5/5/92
c
applied to this project. He recommended that the deadline
provision of the Ordinance should not be applied due to the
multitude of changes and revisions required by the City and the
long delay in waiting for a response from CalTrans. He recommended
two conditions be added: (1) the project must be consistent with
the plans approved by the Commission at this time, and (2) a
6 -month time limit from the date of approval is established in
which to obtain a building permit. These two conditions would meet
the Ordinance intent. He noted the Commission could'"limit the
height to 35 feet or under if it wished to exercise discretion
regarding project esthetics.
Comm. Di Monda determined the required landscaping trees were
smaller than others previously required on other projects. He
stated he wished to discuss more trees in the landscaping plans.
Mr. Schubach stated trees are not only decorative, but would serve__
as noise buffers. Vice-Chmn. Marks noted the number of units had
increased and a gift shop, beauty salon and piano bar had been
added in the revised pla-). Mr. Schubach stated adequate parking
was available.
Public Hearing opened by Vice-Chmn. Marks at 8:19 p.m.
Jeremy Yeh, 49 South Catalina Avenue, Pasadena, acknowledged the
plan changes, noted the major concern regarding 1st Place egress,
discussed the creation of more "ocean view" units and bay windows.
A He explained the revisions to the buildings and room locations
using an artist's rendering of the front and back views of the
structures. He stated the piano bar would provide a nice place for
local adults to go; the lobby, stairway and piano bar locations
were planned to avoid noise carrying to the residential zone.
Vice-Chmn. Marks confirmed the specific plan revisions made with
Mr. Yeh. Mr. Yeh stated that when the project was originally
begun, the maximum height limit was 40 feet. He discussed the
design of the roof, the subterranean parking and the grade level as
they affected the structure height. Mr Yeh also rioted the
restaurant business would financially help the hotel and visa'
versa. He said if the roof level was reduced to 35 feet, the
project would need to be redesigned. He felt such a reduction
would be unfair, based upon the input received by the applicant
during his efforts to obtain the necessary approvals.
Mr. Yeh and Comm. Di Monda discussed the exterior finish of the
building, with Mr. Yeh noting that stainless steel would be used
for the railings and that one piece clay tile will be used.
Richard Laraba, owner/builder/developer 705 1st Street, felt the
proposed structure height would intrude upon the privacy of his
building and the residential zone. He asked if the CalTrans report
required a deceleration zone or lane from 1st Street to the hotel
entrance, noting the speed of drivers on P.C.H. and the projected
increase in traffic on the surrounding streets and expressed
concern regarding the safety of residents due to the increase in
traffic. He also asked where vehicles were going to park during
P.C.Minutes 5/5/92
A*1"1:›12 143 P, C.
W 1-m4
r
Lc kl•::;ILL.
c -Y
LP&C:4:42t*Le.-
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
I, the undersigned, do declare under penalty of perjury
that I did on the 2,?./.4 day of ` QcTee&E, . , 1992-, deposit
into the United States Post Office, first class postage prepaid,
a copy of the Public Notice attached as Exhibit "A" to each and
every person attached as Exhibit "B". I warrant that the persons
named on Exhibit."B" are all the persons required by applicable
law to receive the Public Notice attached as Exhibit "A".
I understand and agree that it is my responsibility to
cause these Public Notices to be made in an aaccurate and timely
fashion and agree to hold the City harmless against any liability
whatsoever for any defect of said notice or notices.
In the event an action is instituted in a court of
competent jurisdiction which questions the legality of the Public
Notices, then the City may in its exclusive discretion suspend
all hearings or cause the cessation of any consturction or of any
use which was permitted as a result of a hearing which was held
on accordance with the Public Notice. In the event that the
court declares the notice hr noticing procedure to be effective,
then the City may in its exclusive discretion revoke any permits
granted and cause any approvals given pursuant to those Public
Notices to be declared null and void and I agree on behalf of
myself and my heirs, assigns or successors -in -interest to hold
the City harmless in connection therewith.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing
is true and correct.
I have executed this declaration on this the Zn 1 day
of /vOVEMewZ_ , 199 2_- at Hermosa Beach, California.
(z s ?&ciFC_ CCA -ST t �Ay
�u-Yi1J4- TNCT
(Name)
(Signature
/4t fr+I/J/f TPATiVE A"Lae
(Capacity)
State of California )
County of Los Angeles ) SS
On this tyle v'Z 1-4 day of Lir/741-1 , 199 , before me,
0tie.//i,. J , the undersigned Notary Public, personally
y4 _
appeared y, 4 -ss ,SS. and proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evii
CIT=Y OIF IDIIEIIBMOSA
IEACIBI MEMORANDUM
October 22, 1992
TO: Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager
FROM: Steve S. Wisniewski, Director of Public Safety
R E: 1st Street Hotel Project
*****************************************************************************
In response to the letter from Mr. Athanasen, be advised that Police representatives
participated in the staff review of this project. At that time, any concerns were stated and
discussed. Staff has considered various issues associated with this type of restaurant/bar and
does not believe that it will increase the traffic problems or drinking problems in this area due
to the type of operation that it will be.
There has been no specific Police study, one is not planned and I don't believe one is necessary
because the impact that the proposed restaurant/bar would have on the area isat best minimal.
TO:
FROM: Michael Schubach, Planni g'•, erector
/ /
SUBJECT: QuestionsPP Res Response to of Su lemental Letters
P
regarding the Proposed Hotel at 125 P.C.H.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager;.
DATE: November 2, 1992
The following comments and explanations are in response to your
memo dated October 21, 1992, regarding questions in three
supplemental letters regarding the hotel project. I have
responded to the questions in the order they were presented.
Letter from the McHugh's:
1. DID THE CITY AND STAFF DO ANOTHER REVIEW OF THE PROJECT AT
125 P.C.H. SINCE THE ORIGINAL PLANS WERE CHANGED ADDING A
RESTAURANT AND BAR.
Yes, the final plans (submitted 4/7/92) were thoroughly
reviewed by the Planning, Building, and Public Works Staff,
and presented to the Planning Commission, emphasizing the
latest modifications, for the Commission's review on May 5,
1992. Notices were again mailed to property owners and
residents within a 300 -foot radius and a public hearing was
held.
As a point of information, the original plans for the hotel
(submitted 7/91) did not include a restaurant and although
this plan was scheduled for P.C. review the hearings were
continued on the request of the applicant. This plan was
then modified (plans submitted 12/91) to add a 3300 sq. ft.
restaurant and bar, which was thoroughly reviewed and became
the subject for the first full Planning Commission review of
the project at the 1/7/92 P.C. meeting. The final proposal
(submitted 4/7/92) reduced the restaurant and bar to 2700 sq.
ft. and added the hotel cocktail lounge, and was also
thoroughly reviewed.
2. WAS THE CALTRANS STUDY DONE TO INCLUDE A HOTEL, A RESTAURANT
AND A BAR?
CalTrans reviewed the 12/91 plans and traffic study for a
64 -room hotel and 3300 sq. ft. restaurant and bar, with two
driveways (P.C.H. and First Place), as did our Traffic
Engineer. In response to a request at that time, CalTrans
also indicated support of exclusive access from P.C.H (with
right -turn only). The final plans were eventually revised to
provide access exclusively from P.C.H. to satisfy our traffic
engineer's concern about spillover traffic on First Place.
L1' -
The addition of the cocktail lounge within the hotel was not
significant in terms of traffic impacts. See the attached
memo from Ed Ruzak, the City's traffic engineer corroborating
that the final changes do not warrant new traffic studies.
3. PLEASE SHOW THAT ANOTHER REVIEW AND STUDY WAS DONE AFTER
THESE CHANGES WERE MADE.
The information is on file in the Planning Department (The
May 5, 1992, staff report to the Planning Commission
summarizes the staff's review of the final plans; and the
memos from each reviewing department are also on file.)
Letter from the Colby's:
The issue of street closures of First Place and First Street,
discussed in connection to the hotel project, was a separate
issue requiring much further study. It was never a recommended
action in conjuction with the hotel.
The proposed hotel will result in only an incremental change to
traffic patterns and volumes in the area, which will be
negligible in comparison with the previous car dealership and
repair business. There is not a nexus between the traffic
impacts of the Hotel and its impact on First Place/First Street
traffic to justify requiring the hotel developer to close the
streets or to delay the project while closure is being studied.
The issue of street closures should be reviewed relative to
overall traffic patterns and volumes in the area, which are tied
to both residential and commercial generated traffic in the
vicinity, and also in terms of impacts on other residential
streets.
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM
TO: ) Michael Schubach, Planning Director
FROM: /,rd J. Ruzak, City Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: 25 Pacific Coast Highway Hotel Traffic Study
DATE: November 3, 1992
I am in receipt of your November 2, 1992 memo regarding the
change from the December 18, 1991 plans to the April 7, 1992
plans for the subject hotel.
I have reviewed the vehicular and pedestrian traffic impact
ramifications of six additional rooms, 600 square feet less of
restaurant bar and a cocktail lounge primarily for use by patrons
of the hotel.
I do not find that the slight change in vehicular traffic is
significant. I also do not believe that there is a need for a
new traffic study based solely on these slight land use changes.
cc: Charles S. McDonald, Public Works Director
pwadmin/ER3
3
0—
WE REQUEST THIS TO BE PLACED ON THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OF
THE OCTOBER 27, 1992 COUNCIL MEETING.
DEAR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND MAYOR OF HERMOSA BEACH,
WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THE CITY AND STAFF OF HERMOSA BEACH
HAS DONE ANOTHER REVIEW OF THE PROJECT AT 125 PACIFIC COAST
HIGHWAY, SINCE THE ORIGINAL PLANS WERE CHANGED ADDING A
RESTAURANT AND BAR?
ALSO WAS THE CAL TRANS STUDY DONE TO INCLUDE A HOTEL, A
RESTAURANT AND A BAR?
PLEASE SHOW THAT ANOTHER REVIEW AND STUDY WAS DONE AFTER
THESE CHANGES WERE MADE.
SINCERELY,
JOHN MC HUGH
JANET MC HUGH
)"e
(J
PLEASE PLACE THIS ON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FOR 10/27/92 MEETING
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH
REGARDING THE PROPOSED HOTEL AND BAR AND RESTAURANT AT
125 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, HERMOSA BEACH.
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF A POLICE STUDY HAS BEEN DONE ON
THIS PROJECT, I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THAT A POLICE STUDY
BE DONE BEFORE APPROVING PLANS FOR ANOTHER BAR IN THIS
NEIGHBORHOOD.
STEVE ATHANASEN
HERMOSA BEACH
PLEASE PLACE THIS ON OCTOBER 27 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
TO THE HERMOSA BEACH MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM MR. & MRS. SIB COLBY
719 FIRST PLACE
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIF.
SINCE THE CLOSURE OF FIRST STREET & FIRST PLACE WEST OF
PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, WAS DUE TO AN EXPECTED INCREASE OF
TRAFFIC CONGESTION & PARKING PROBLEMS, FROM A PROPOSED
HOTEL, RESTAURANT & BAR, WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHY THESE
PLANS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BEFORE THE STREET CLOSURE HAS BEEN
RESOLVED.
WE DEMAND THAT THE CITY PUT A HOLD ON APPROVING THESE PLANS
UNTIL THE STREET CLOSURE IS RESOLVED.
SINCERELY,
THE COLBYS
1.6V61.--orti4 /b Nur' Ncwet, or
6/667,fiv 06t LeiJk.r meg,- soir)61,0116rP6 0A) el 7? 9?
Pk() PC197 tol)ki itt$-7-1167.- in6-onva-.. •
AT 071 ar C1)/J f14-3 f
Pt
garvfos# ea/ Q
4/0
at Try qt9(tri.wi Lc*. puoue.
bilin a WI LJ pLosr iceOtt) FiLot4tir 7.2irr reis7),Yiptir,
11
)17-
Pviet-ta Atmitei A16- /t:2' pa "do Ter/ 426-S7;1NR
L
,!
I. ii PS- aommisstot) Reng*& kb 00770i6 P
I!ttricoAL-,
ngry 0 onteb-le114//v6 th,--/Or of ..gaverifea,og
or wat..) t4+7- itAiiiith /Iv c.gbrY)SE. Ou7bob2 5' 611170,
' , 101N N6 Tuvreun (tr nSG(... s 147-thfisit.
'll
!I
.•:'Tgr
tcP.oct;s1s oc% nPfTeotiOL of 7His /1)07-6-6, ._7::70tr
i10 b ':T-c77Vf; THE' 'ego -460.7- As' /VOL) .516-•s1N),
it 1"..;""Nre— sA rib' f
itIC --o'FALLY :br PFM-t\lr THAN c:stwicEPTA461. -MarciF
Msr Nov., Vor6; GRA 6740g Tims. „bious NOT
1119PPuf J _r SPor:6 CLOW -rF"-s'u)s-ri7O
1(ki Pturkiltu6.• J»-p/oN UitIf (s Alava- a.ri,
ri-1715- Gg66-` L/N6- 21/P6 Ti) /7711BLIS#
!!
/I6 -67'r Or 'Lt»'& 61S0 lArrEfig 7,114A)
JA--.
r -CL Gt,n,,OP ORIGINOL S irrg.r
PPo\Tc7- [Epps ei;c0M6:" TOO ii970\ig/Vof-
.s-nz6-er ot_osuor mvsr f3 CON
RECEIVLU
S, AgOVE NOV 1 0 1992 st4Pptbin
CITY MGR. OFFICE
11 0 ••/)i.R. ' '''''K.6tir6 ger P(Av Itel.. t_o Tip 2 I
L
1
filmvtt . zsstos gontiliV 70 a 6 7 ' Soti_Vb' FINAG.
I!ttricoAL-,
IS 7Y)/(\a Nor 714c7)F161 flr VIS
177fi1if tiot4 mu. Ivor )aPIN6. Vr ;beATELD4112- oe.
pirrriii og you eSFLVZ • kiJIH • ft2FrOsi7Wk r IIPPRDV At
._,...
ii 1_0 Norpe
it 1"..;""Nre— sA rib' f
RECEIVLU
S, AgOVE NOV 1 0 1992 st4Pptbin
CITY MGR. OFFICE
h9-zc.� //—/4—? -1-
A-7 rite.:4
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING SERVICES
22861 IRONBARK DRIVE * DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 * TELEPHONE\FAX (714) 860-1757
NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
NOVEMBER 9, 1992
7:00 PM
Dear Neighbor:
You are invited to a neighborhood meeting with representatives of the applicant for the
proposed King Harbor Hotel' project. The purpose of the meeting is to present the detailed
plans, afford you the opportunity to see the plans close-up and discuss your concerns on a
one to one basis. The meeting will be held at the time, place and location as follows:
COMMUNITY CENTER
ROOM NO. 8
710 PIER AVENUE
Monday, November 9, 1992
7:00 pm
On behalf of the applicant, we look forward to meeting with you.
Sincerely,
CO UNITY D VELOPMENT CONSULTING SERVICES
Gary . Werner
e -r
6.) ki
qa-
E; 1.D
. k; T
‘"..11a
— Community Development Consulting Services
22861 Ironbark Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Pcsreb No ..
4188 023 013
JOSE A GONZALEZ CO TR8T
718 1ST PLACE
HERMOSA BEACH CA 90254
IMPORTANT - Neighborhood Information
I:7.r.- •
•
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
• 13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO. 90- 102.7.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
THE ZONING -MAP AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TU -CREATE -SPECIFIC LPLP ANS
AREA NO. 7_,JFOR THE AREAS AS DESCRIBED`LBELOW AND`SHOWN-ON-THE
ATTACHED MAPS AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on March 27,j
1990 to receive public testimony regarding Zone Change 89-9, the
establishment of a specific plan area zone in the Commercial
Corridor area located south of 8th Street ;f and Qm`ade
;fol flowing findigs':\
A. A specific plan area zone will implement the policies
contained in resolution 89-5270 adopted by the City Council,
by establishing standards more restrictive than the C-3 zone
to regulate commercial development to ensure compatibility
with_adjacent residential areas along Pacific Coast Highway,
and bring the zoning into consistency with the General Plan;
B. The height limits will lessen the potential view impact of
commercial development;
C. Landscaping requirements will improve the buffering of
commercial development from residential uses, buffering
residents from noise and visual impacts, and :will contribute
towards the improving the appearance of commercial projects;
D. The review of individual' projects for compliance with the
ti
standards contained in the specific plan area, and for the
purpose of considering the view impact of individual projects
by the Planning Commission will serve to further ensure that
commercial development will not be incompatible with existing
residential neighborhoods;
E. \The rezoning to specific plan areas will result in -7a
sj
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
v
=a,!"rat.�-A. -=r:r: i : e'£-�,
development char.act-e•r---fo.r the subject areas - which i -s
apptOpriate for the surroundings;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of .Hermosa Beach, California, does
hereby ordain that the zoning map and the zoning ordinance text
be amended as shown on the attached map and described as follows:
SECTION 1. Rezone the Commercial Corridor General Plan
designated area located on the east and west side of
Pacific Coast Highway north of the south city
boundary and south of_ Eighth Street to Specific Plan
Area No. 7, legally described as follows:
t
Eastside:
South City Boundary -1st Street: Lot 1-7 Trafton
Heights Tract
1st -2nd St.: Lots 39-51 Trafton Heights Tract, Lots
40-46 of Home Builders Place -
2nd -3rd St: Lots 1-4 of Home Builders Place, Lots 2,
4 of the Mission Tract,
3rd -4th St.: Lots 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 of Mission Tract;
Westerly 12' of Lot 12, and Lots 13, 14, 15 of
Hurd's Ocean View Tract
4th -5th St.: Lots 1, 2, Portion of lot 3 of Hurd's
Ocean View Tract, Lots 17-23 of Garden View Tract
5th -6th st.: Lots 1-5 of Tract #294, Westerly 40' of
Lots 11-13, and Lots 14-16 of Camino Real Tract
6th -7th St.: 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract,
Block 85, portion of lot 7 (Westerly 121.8'); Lots
17-19 of Wilson & Lind's Tract -
7th -8th St.: Lots 14-16 Wilson and Lind's Tract
Westside:
'6th -8th St.: Lots 1-4 of Redondo Hermosa Tract; Lots
27 and 28, Block 78, 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach,
portion of Lots 1-3, Lots 4-9 of Tract #8525
5th -6th St.: Portion of Lots 24, 25, Block 78, 2nd
Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract
4th -5th St.: Lots 1-4 of Koepke's Tract, Lots 1-5 of
V Thorne's Hillside #2
3rd -4th St.: Portion of Lots 23-28. lots 29, 56, 57,
of Walter Ransom Co.'s Venable Place Tract
C,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
fsz
2nd -3rd St.: Portion of Lots 58-63, Lots -64, 65, 88
and 89 & Easterly 10' of lot 87 Walter Ransom Co.'s
Venable Place Tract
r17§t=2nd-St-:-Portion of Lots 90 -95 of Walter._Rans
Co : Ts—VenaAble—Place Tract& L`ots 96-99 , 118-119,
portion or Lots 1-6; Lots 7, 8 of Tract #5019, Lot
142 of Walter Ransom Co.'s Venable Place Tract
t -1§1 -Southern City Boundary:'Lots--143-145.of Wal -ter
Ransom-Co:"'s Venable Place Tract;
SECTION 2. The following text shall be added to the zoning
ordinance:
Article 9.7, Chapter 7, Specific Plan Area No. 7
Section 9.67-1. Authority.
This Specific Plan Area is an instrument for
implementing the General plan pursuant to Article 8,
Chapter 3, of the State of California Planning and
Zoning Law (California Government Code Section 65450 et.
Seq.)
Section 9.67-2 Location and Description.
The subject area is located on the east and west side of
Pacific Coast Highway and is designated as Commercial
Corridor on the Official General Plan Map.
Section 9.67-3 Purpose.
The purpose of the Specific Plan Area is to set forth
the development requirements, standards and permitted
uses for the subject area, and to carry out the policies
of the Commercial Corridor General Plan area as stated
in the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
Section 9.67-4 Permitted Uses.
A. Commercial permitted uses shall be the tame as those
permitted in C-3 General Commercial Zone as contained in
Section 8-4 of the City of Hermosa Beach zoning
ordinance, and nonconforming uses shall be subject to
the provisions of Article 13, Nonconforming Building and
Uses of the zoning ordinance.
B. A property being exclusively used for residential
purposes at the date of the adoption of this ordinance
shall be permitted to be continued as a residential use,
maintaining its conforming status, and may be remodeled
or redeveloped as a residential use -as long as the
density (number of dwelling units) is not increased.
3
3;j:g{5'*Sk ,.Y�.�i l*,;t*•; M'. rA: _ G ?L {':?i% O.4 ;,. ,:=4,:VAT.f . ,i-;•:`rc •
.. i .. •�.,x-% <<'-J��f�tpy�'�? „ _ ..r
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C. Residentially developed properties or vacant --properties
can only -be•conver.ted to commercial uses if the property
fronts on Pacific Coast Highway or is an assemblage of
properties which front on Pacific Coast Highway.
D. Properties:with existing commercial uses or other than
residential uses which do not front on Pacific- Coast
Highway may be used commercially, expanded, and/or
remodeled, if the existing access is maintained.
E. Any residential use which shares a lot or parcel with a
commercial use shall be considered a nonconforming use
and subject to Article 13 of the zoning ordinance.
Section 9.67-5 Residential Development Standards
A. In respect to height, yard, setback, open space, and
dimensional requirements, any residential project
whether new or a remodel of an existing structure shall
be subject to the provisions contained in the zoning
ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach, depending on the
applicable zoning district. The applicable residential
zoning district shall be determined based on the nearest
residential zoning district on the same block.
Section 9 -67=6 -Commercial -Development -Standards
A. Purposeand In'tent;The standaids and guidelines aie
designed to protect the health, safety,—and-wel=fare of
the citizens of Hermosa Beach and to encourage the
raevelopment of high quality commercial. development along
1-Paci'f c Coast Highway in espec' t to its impa_ct_ on'
N. -residential projects, environmental impacts
circulation, and appearanc j
N
B. Standards. Two sets of standards apply in -this specific
plan area, First Tier and Second Tier. Compliance with
First Tier standards allows the project to proceed with
a building permit. If a project goes beyond any of the
first tier standards the procedure for submittal and
approval of a Precise Development Plan shall be
followed. Developments must be in compliance with
Second Tier standards at all times.
Project sponsors are encouraged to discuss preliminary
plans of proposed projects with the Planning Department
before making any formal applications for building
permits or Precise Development Plans.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
• 13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
First Tier
Maximum/Minimum
Requirements
Second Tier
Maximum/Minimum
Requirements
1. Maximum Height:
East of P.C.H.- 30 feet
West of P.C.H.- 30 feet
2. Bulk: Max. 1.0 F.A.R.*
*Gross Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio
structures)
35 feet
40 feet
none
(excludes parking
xMa imum-Size:-``10;000 sq. ft. none
Gros.s_Elo.or_Ar_ea_-_
. Min. Landscape
Coverage: 5% of lot area
(The required landscape buffer
residential zones shall not
calculation)
2% of lot area
between commercial and
be included in --this
C. Requirements. The following requirements apply to
proposed projects:
1. Landscaping Specifications
a) A minimum three (3) foot wide planter strip with
raised 6" curbing, or an area equivalent in size to
a 3 -foot wide planter strip along the front of the
lot, shall be provided along street frontage. A
5 -gallon shrub shall be provided for each 20 sq.
ft.
all
b) Landscaping Buffer from residentially zoned
property:
A Minimum five (5) foot wide planter strip
landscaped with a minimum of one 24 -inch or
15 -gallon size specimen tree provided for every 10
feet of length.
c) Six (6) inch high raised concrete curbing shall be
provided along the perimeter of all landscaped
areas except on the side abutting building walls,
or fences.
d)
All landscaped areas shall include an automatic
irrigation system.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
' 13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e) The landscape plan and irrigation system shall be
reviewed andapproved by the Planning Director.
2. The development,_ _including the landscaping_ and the
entire property grounds, shall be maintained in a neat
and clean manner.
3. Setback from Residentially Zoned Property:
A minimum of eight (8) feet plus two (2) feet for each
additional story.
4. All other development standards shall be governed by the
City of Hermosa Beach Zoning Ordinance, including, but
not.. -limited to Article 8, Commercial Zones, and Article
11.5, Off -Street Parking; with the exception of Article
14, Division 3, Precise Development Plans.
Section 9.67-6. Precise Development`Plan
A. ;Purpose.
Thepurpose of this section is to set fort- the
procedures and guidelines for review of Precise
Development Plans, which are required when a proposed
project exceeds any one of the First Tier standards.
B. Guidelines for Planning Commission review
1. rGeneral Guidelines: To allow projects which exceed
any of the first tier standards, the overall
building and project design should be of a superior
quality, be compatible with surrounding properties,
and be designed in scale with the community. The
Planning Commission shall consider the following in
making this determination:
a. The building should be designed -with interesting
architectural features and materials to enhance
the overall project. A three-dimensional
quality should be emphasized by the use of
stepping architectural features to avoid massive
flat building faces. Special attention should
be given to the appearance of the building from
the street.
b. Landscaping should be utilized throughout the
site in a manner which enhances the building and'
the site, and to mitigate the visual impacts of
any flat and/or massive parts of the building.
c. The project should be compatible with'";
neighboring projects with respect to heightf,
scale,_bulk, proportion. This is not_ a
-prescription for similar architectural styles,'
6
•
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
although in some cases it may be desirable, nor
a prescription to match existing buildings, as
many existing buildings do not stand scrutiny
under these guidelines.
d. Architectural renderings and perspectives must
be submitted to show the three dimensional
quality of the proposed building(s).
2 eight. To allow projects to exceed the first tier,
height limits the building design' should incorporate:
ffeatures=to—minimize and break-up the visual--impacti
Viand view impacts•---of—th_e—higher—structure `-"orifi
neighboring residential- area.s and ons the-
streetscape. The Planning Commission shall consider
the following guidelines in making this
determination:
a. Limit lot coverage of uppermost level: The area
of the portion of the structure which exceeds
the first tier height limit should not cover a
major portion of the lot area, and said
over -height area should be compensated by a
proportional area of the building which is -at or
less than the height limit.
b. Flat roofs and flat tall vertical walls should
be avoided: Stepped, variable, or sloping roofs
should be encouraged. The appearance of flat
roofs and massive flat vertical walls should be
avoided through the use of stepping or tiered
architectural features.
c. Greater setbacks for upper levels: Progressing
from the first floor to the uppermost story of
the building setbacks from the rear property
line should increase and exceed minimum
requirements, and the upper stories shall have
tiered setbacks from the lower levels as viewed
from the front.
3. Bulk. To allow projects which exceed the maximum
Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio (F.A.R.) the building
design should incorporate features to minimize the
appearance of bulk, and to compensate for the bulk
of a building with attractive architectural features
which enhance the building and which reduce the
visual impact of large areas of flat vertical walls.
The Planning Commission shall consider the following
guidelines in making this determination:
a. Avoid "box -like" structures: Significant and
attractive architectural features should be used
to break up the bulky appearance of "box -like"
structures.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
b. Building step -backs: Step-ins and Step -outs
should be used on the front of the building to
break up the bulky appearance. This could
accompany varying widths of the landscape
planter area in the front of the building.
c. Variable heights: The roof -line of the building
should should be designed with variable heights,
and roof patterns or materials, to avoid the
appearance of a flat building.
4. Landscaping. The objective of the landscaping
requirement is to .enhance the overall project
including the streetscape, to complement the
building design, to break up the impact of vast
expanses of pavement, to buffer sound and visual
impacts on neighboring residential areas, to provide
shade for parking areas and to deflect direct
sunlight into the interior of buildings. To allow
less than the minimum 5% coverage, a landscaping
plan must compensate for the loss of coverage by
providing a superior design through the use of
types, quantity, and location of plant materia_ls to
achieve the objectives described above.
B. General Cr.i.ter.ia..
In considering the Precise Development Plan for any
development, the following criteria for granting or -
conditionally ' granting said permit shall be�
considered:
,rs
In --Distance- from existing residential uses`—`in
L ---relation to negative effects ---1
2.. Impact on ocean views from residential areas
3. Zile amount of existing or proposed off-street
parking in relation to actual need:
4.�Tlie combination of uses -proposed, as they tel t
to compatibility. __-'
5. The relations'tiip'of'--the--estimated generated
Traffic volume and the capacity and safety of`'
streets serving the area.
6. The proposed exterior signs and decor, and the
compatibility thereof with existing
establishments in the area.
7. Building and driveway orientation in relation to
sensitive uses, e.g., residences and schools.
8. rtfoise, odor, dustand/or—vi•bra'ti'on thatmay be,.=
generated by the proposed use.
M
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
• 13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9. (Impact of the proposed use to the ci y'-st
infrastructure, and/or services.
10. Adequacy of mitigation measures to minimize
environmental impacts in quantitative terms.
1-1-`Othe"r— considerations that, in the judgment of
14.—:—the he Planning Commission, are necessary to assure
compatibility with the_surrounding uses, and they`
city as a wh o l e%i-�`
C. Criteria for denial. t
1. `The proposed development would-"substantiall-y---
d"epreciate property values in the vicinity or
interfere with the use -or enjoyment of property
cin such area, because of excessive dissimilarity
i'jor inappropriateness of design in relation toy
the surrounding vicinity, and there are no known:
,
condi
itions of approval.which—whichmposed that
could resolve -such problems.
2. The --proposed development would have -significant
;environmental adverse impacts which can not be
mitigated, and where the findirig'of overriding
iconsiderations cannot be Eade.
D. The decision of the Planning Commission may be
appealed to the City Council by filing a written
appeal within ten (10) days ,of the Planning
Commission's decision.
E. An approved Plan shall be valid for a one (1) year
period and, should development fail to commence
within such time limitation and no extension is
granted, shall become null and void.
F. No person shall violate or fail to comply with any
approved plan or any condition or provision thereof,
nor shall a building permit be issued for any
building or structure which would violate or fail to
comply with an approved Plan.
G. General Procedures and submittal requirements.
1. Application for Precise Development Plan review
shall be filed and approval given prior to the
issuance of building permits.
2. Applications shall include detailed and fully
dimensioned site plans, building plans, floor
plans, architectural drawings and elevations
including perspective drawings. to exhibit the
required three-dimensional features, landscape
plans and/or any other data found to be
reasonably required
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. Applications shall be submitted to the City
Planning Department and shall be in compliance
with the department's specific requirements.
4. Fees- for submittals -shall be set by policy of
the City Council.
SECTION 3. Amend Ordinance No. 89-1004 regarding the moratorium
on the issuance of building permits for the
"Multi -Use Corridor to exclude the above described
properties rezoned by this ordinance.
SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full
force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of
its final passage and adoption. -
SECTION 5. The City Council shall designate the City Attorney
to prepare a summary of this ordinance to be
published pursuant to Government Code Section
36933(c) (1) in lieu of the full text of said
ordinance. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15)
days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk
shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy
Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation,
published and circulated in the City of Hermosa
Beach.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in
the book of original ordinances of said city, and
shall make minutes of the passage and adoption
thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City
Council at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSE APPROVED,
day of
and ADOPTED this
Apel/
P'ES DENT ofthety Council and MAYOR
f the City of Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
,�Q L.c cJa-L1 �-y C I TY CLERK
p/perscc
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
(/L) CITY ATTORNEY
- 10 -
WILLIAM B. BARR
CHARLES S. VOSE
CONNIE COOKE SANDIFER
JAMES DUFF MURPHY
ROGER W. SPRINGER
EDWARD W. LEE
HERIBERTO F. OIAZ
JANICE R. MIYAHIRA
BETH S. BERGMAN
LAW OFFICES
OLIVER, BARR & VOSE
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1000 SUNSET BOULEVARD
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012
(213) 250-3043
MEMORANDUM
111/o/ .
TELECOPIER
(213) 482-5336
do -...L. a a9 • // /5z
CONFIDENTIAL
TO: Michael Schubach, Director of Planning
City of Hermosa Beach
FROM: Edward W. Lee, Assistant City Attorney 0"'_
DATE: November 6, 1992
RE: King Harbor Hotel
125 Pacific Coast Highway
Hermosa Beach, California
QUESTION PRESENTED
At the direction of the City, this office has been asked
to issue a written legal opinion regarding the application of
Ordinance No. 91-1063 to the subject project. The specific
question is whether the subject project is exempt from the
maximum height limits imposed by said initiative ordinance?
CONCLUSION
Based upon the facts as noted below, it is the opinion of
this office that the subject project is and continues to be
exempt from the provisions of Ordinance No. 91-1063 which
restricts the height of commercial structures to thirty-five
(35) feet in Specific Plan Area No. 7 on the West side of
Pacific Coast Highway under the second tier criteria.
12546
OLIVER, BARR & VOSE
MEMORANDUM
November 10, 1992
Page 2.
DISCUSSION
Facts
The subject project is located in Specific Plan Area No.
7 ("SPA 7"). The project is located on the west side of
Pacific Coast Highway. The final configuration of the project
provides for a roof structure at the southwest portion of the
project at a height of thirty-eight (38) feet, which exceeds by
three (3) feet, current Municipal Code limits as established by
the Ordinance No. 91-1063.
The SPA 7 zone specifically provides for a two-tiered
height limitation to the construction of commercial structures
within the zone. The original height limits under the
Municipal Code at Sec. 9.67-6, allowed a maximum height of
thirty (30) feet on the west of P.C.H. in the first tier and
forty (40) feet in the second tier. The first tier establishes
certain development standards under which a developer has a
right to develop upon compliance with all such standards. The
second tier allows greater height to the structure upon the
submission of a precise development plan by the developer and
consideration by the Planning Commission.
Ordinance No. 91-1063 (the "Ordinance") was approved by a
vote of the people of the City of Hermosa Beach on November 5,
1991. The City Council declared the results of the ballot
measure on November 26, 1991 by Resolution No. 91-5506 in
accordance with the law. Said Ordinance lowered the maximum
height of commercial structures on the west side of P.C.H.
under the second tier to thirty-five (35) feet. All other
standards remained unchanged.
The Ordinance under Section 4 specifically provides a
"grandfather" provision for "projects that have a completed
building permit package on file with the City prior to November
5, 1991." The Ordinance requires that a developer "must pursue
their application in a diligent manner and must be issued a
building permit within six months of the effective date of this
ordinance."
A chronology of events was prepared by staff and included
as part of staff's report to the Commission on this matter.
(Please see "CHRONOLOGY RE:125 P.C.H. HOTEL" attached and
hereinafter the "Chronology") The Chronology indicates that
12546
OLIVER, BARR & VOSE
MEMORANDUM
November 10, 1992
Page 3.
the developer submitted the original plans on July 2, 1991.
The first hearing date before the Planning Commission occurred
on November 19, 1991. That hearing was continued due to a lack
of response from Caltrans related to certain traffic issues on
the project. At the continued hearing on December 3, 1991, the
Chronology notes that the developer was considering a re -design
of the project. On December 18, 1991, the City received
revised plans which indicated a 64 -room hotel and attached
restaurant.
This office was advised that said revised plans were a
direct result of staff and Commission comments related to the
quality and amenities of the project. The applicant's re-
design of the project provided for the addition of a restaurant
amenity and the subsequent reduction of the number of rooms.
From January 7, 1992 through August 4, 1992, the project
underwent several changes in response to further comments from
the Planning Commission. These comments involved such matters
as re -orientation of the buildings on the property, relocating
the swimming pool and consideration of moving the restaurant to
the penthouse. During this same time period, the applicant
also initiated and met with staff, Commissioner Di Monda and
Councilmember Essertier to discuss the applicant's specific
concerns on the redesign of the project. Those meetings were
disclosed at both the Planning Commission and Council hearings
on this matter.
A conditional use permit and precise development plan were
approved by the Commission on August 4, 1992. At the Council
meeting of September 8, 1992, the City Council considered an
appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission to approve
the project and took action to refer the matter back to the
Commission. The Council requested further Commission
consideration of the height of the block wall on the easterly
property line and the height of the building in excess of 35
feet. The matter is now returned to the Council with
Commission recommendation.
Discussion
At the Commission hearing of May 5, 1992, this office
issued an oral opinion as to the status of the project in
relation to Ordinance No. 91-1063. At that meeting, we stated
that the matter of exemption under the Ordinance turned on two
significant factors: i) whether the revised project was a
12546
• OLIVER, BARR & VOSE
MEMORANDUM
November 10, 1992
Page 4.
logical extension of the original submitted plans and ii)
whether the City's actions during consideration of this project
would toll the application of the time deadline contained in
the Ordinance.
"As a building development evolves from drawing board into
reality, the vested rights rule establishes a stage of progress
when reliance upon the governmental assurances estops the
government from asserting new or different regulations." Raley
v. California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (1977) 68
Cal.App.3d 965, 978. The "grandfather" provision in Section 4
of the Ordinance provides that basic assurance that any project
with a complete building permit package submitted to the City
prior to November 5, 1991, which is diligently pursued and
issued a building permit within six months of the effective
date of the Ordinance, would not be subject to the new height
restrictions under the Ordinance.
In this case, the Ordinance recognized a limited vested
right in the subject project to proceed through the development
permit process. The initial question before the Commission
therefore, was whether the revised plans submitted by the
developer on December 18, 1991, constituted a new project which
would not fall within the class of projects exempted by the
Ordinance or were a logical extension of the original project.
That determination was and is, in the opinion of this office,
a discretionary decision of the Commission. At the Commission
hearing of May 5, 1992, the Commission made that determination
by continuing its consideration of the project and requesting
further information related to additional re -design of the
project.
"The vested rights theory is predicated upon estoppel of
the governing body." Raley, supra., p. 977. The doctrine of
estoppel can be applied to zoning ordinances in such instances
where "the injustice is great and the precedent set by the
estoppel is narrow." Smith v. County of Santa Barbara (1992)
7 Cal.App.4th 770, 775. However, an estoppel will generally
not be applied against the government "if to do so would
effectively nullify 'a strong rule of policy, adopted for the
public benefit,..."' Pettitt v. City of Fresno (1973) 34
Cal.App.3d 813, 819. The case of City of Long Beach v. Mansell
(1970) 3 Ca1.3d 462 at page 489 established the basic elements
for an estoppel as follows:
12546
OLIVER, BARR & VOSE
MEMORANDUM
November 10, 1992
Page 5.
"(1) the party to be estopped must be apprised of the
facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted
upon, or must so act that the party asserting the estoppel
had a right to believe it was so intended; (3) the other
party must ignorant of the true state of facts; and (4) he
must rely upon the conduct to his injury."
Applying the pertinent facts to the stated rules of law,
this office recommended that the subject project continue to be
exempted from the application of the Ordinance. The public
policy to restrict the height of commercial structures in the
SPA 7 zone were limited by the terms of the Ordinance itself,
which provided for an exemption to the Ordinance for a certain
class of projects. The subject project initially fell within
that exempted class and the Ordinance recognized a limited
vested right in the subject project. The subsequent revisions
of the project plans were a direct result of comments from the
City both at the staff level and at Commission hearings. Of
note, is the fact that the Commission addressed this issue at
its hearing of May 5, 1992, and proceeded with review and
requests for re -design of the project. The developer acting
upon such comments, re -designed the project several times,
considered certain variations on the configuration, location
and orientation of various elements of the project, and
ultimately received approval of the project by the Commission
on August 4, 1992.
This opinion relies on the facts made available to this
office. If there are any substantial changes in the facts of
this case, this office will reconsider it position.
EWL:mc
Enclosure
CHRONOLOGY RE. 125 P.C.H. HOTEL
7/2/91 - Original submittal, "Holiday Inn Express" 71 -room , no
restaurant -near 40' high in rear.
7/18/91 - Staff Env. Review Committee - continued for applicant to
submit traffic study.
8/1/91 - Traffic study received - circulated for review.
10/3/91 - Staff Env. Review Committee - 71 -unit - no restaurant - 40'
high. Staff recommends Negative Declaration with mitigation.
10/7/91 - Revised plans submitted then circulated, still 71-unit/no
restaurant.
11/5/91 - Proposition I passes to lower height in C-3 and Specific Plan
Area (SPA) zones to 35 feet.
11/19/91 - 1st scheduled Planning Commission hearing on 71 -unit proposal
& continued to 12/3/91 at request of applicant (outstanding
Caltrans & Public Works issues). _
12/3/91 - Planning Commission hearing - continued at request of
applicant to 1/7/92 (still no Caltrans comments; considering
re -design).
12/18/91 - Received revised plan, 64 -units with attached restaurant
(still designed to 40' high in rear) pool located in rear
north of building; also revised traffic study received -
plans circulated for review.
1/7/92 - P.C. hearing - staff, recommends continuance based on
outstanding traffic issues, no CalTrans comments and pool
location - plans discussed at hearing - P. C. continues to
2/18/92 based on staff recommendations - also P.C. requests
Attorney's opinionon whether 40 -foot height is grandfathered
and requests survey of residents .on First Place.
1/22/92 - Meeting in Planning Department at developer request -Present:*
applicant and his architect, Michael Schubach, Ken Robertson,
Joe DiMonda, Robert Essertier. Applicant shows new sketches
- better view orientation, no access on First Place, addition
of cocktail lounge with sun deck, relocation of pool to
south, general suggestions made by staff and J.D. and R.E. in
regards to possible design improvements
2/12/92 - Meeting held in Planning Department at developer request.
Present: architect, Michael Schubach, Ken Robertson, Joe
DiMonda, Robert Essertier. Applicant shows refined new
concept, only suggestions made are about details and
discussion or remaining process, applicant reminded that P.C.
still waiting for Attorney's opinion regarding height issue.
2/18/92 - P.C. hearing - continue to April 7, 1992 at request of )
applicant for more tine to finalize new concept.
2/24/92 - Comments received from CalTrans, no objections to project,
and notes acceptance of one access from P.C.H.
- 10-
4/7/92
.
5/5/92
6/16/92 -
Revised plans received, 70 -room hotel with piano bar and deck
at third floor and attached restaurant (still 40' high in
rear) and P.C.H. as only access
P.C. hearing - Staff recommends conditional approval,
Attorney states 40' height OK to grandfather, P.C. continues
project to 6/16/92 and requests information on several items,
including revisions regarding landscaping, trash dumpsters.
P.C. hearing - P.C. continues to 8/4/92, because no revised
plans submitted. P.C. hears staff's response to previously
noted concerns
7/21/92 - Revised Plans received - minor changes to address
landscaping, trash dumpster location
"8/4/92 - P.C. hearing - P.C. approves project subject to conditions
including 12' high wall, the return of sign plans, landscape
plans, material samples, etc.
C.C. hearing on reconsideration of P.C. decision - referred
back to the P.C. to review and comment on increasing wall
height and the grandfathering of the building height
9/8/92
-f
p/king
l
ORDINANCE NO. 91-1063
2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO LIMIT MAXIMUM HEIGHT
3 IN THE C-2 AND C-3 ZONES AND SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS NO. 7 AND NO. 8.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, the citizens of Hermosa Beach desire to protect
the low profile character of Hermosa Beach; and
WHEREAS, the citizens desire to protect wherever
possible both public and private scenic views; and
WHEREAS, the citizens desire to limit the intensity of
development within the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DO
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Amend Article 8, Commercial Zones, Section
8-5, Standards and Limitations (6) Building Height as follows:
"b. In the C-2 zone, no building shall exceed a maximum
height of thirty (30) feet.
c. In the C-3 zone, no building shall exceed a maximum
height of thirty-five (35) feet."
SECTION 2. Amend Article 9.6, Specific Plan Areas,
Division 7, Specific Plan Area No. 7, Section 9.67-6, Commercial
development standards, (b) Standards, as follows:
(1) Maximum height:
East of P.C.H.
West of P.C.H.
First Tier Second Tier
Maximum/ Maximum/
Minimum Minimum
Requirements Requirements
30 feet
30 feet
35 feet
35 feet
SECTION 3. Amend Article 9.6, Specific Plan Areas,
Division 8, Plan Area No. 8, Section 9.68-6, Commercial
development standards, (b) Standards, as follows:
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(1) Maximum height:
East of P.C.H.
West of P.C.H.
First Tier Second Tier
Maximum/ Maximum/
Minimum Minimum
Requirements Requirements
25 feet
30 feet
35 feet
35 feet
SECTION 4. This ordinance shall not apply to any
projects that have a completed building permit package on file
with the City prior to November 5, 1991. Said package must
include a completed building permit application form, completed
conceptual plans (plot plan, floor plan, elevation plan and
similar plans), and a lot survey. Projects that have submitted a
completed building permit package must pursue their application
in a diligent manner and must be issued a building permit within
six months of the effective date of this ordinance.
SECTION 5. If any section or subsection of this
ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable,
such holding shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance or any such part
thereof.
SECTION 6. There shall be no modification, amendment or
repeal of any provisions of this ordinance without a vote of the
people.
SECTION 7. Any ordinance which is adopted concurrently
with this ordinance which receives less votes and is in conflict
with any provisions herein, shall be repealed in its entirety and
of no force and effect.
SECTION 8. This ordinance shall take effect in the
manner prescribed by law.
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ordinance No. 91-1063
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE
ELECTORATE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON
NOVEMBER 5, 1991 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES - 2,097
NOES - 1,144
PRESIDENT of the City Council and
MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the
Hermosa Beach City Council
SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 92-4
Ce 77st
- //--A _yy
November 3, 1992
Regular Meeting of
November 10, 1992
PURPOSE: TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR OR
PROHIBIT SECOND UNITS PURSUANT TO STATE CODE 65852.2
INITIATED BY PLANNING COMMISSION
Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation
Adopt the attached ordinance to establish requirements for the
creation of second units (although staff recommends modifying the
Commission's recommended maximum unit size from 500 square feet
to 600 square feet.)
Background
At their meeting of October 20, 1992, the Planning Commission
voted 5:0 to recommend adoption of the ordinance. The Commission
modified staff's recommended language to reduce the maximum unit
size from 700 square feet to 500 square feet.
For further background information please refer to the attached
Planning Commission staff report and minutes.
The City has recently received two requests for conditional use
permits for second units in existing single family dwellings.
Pursuant to Section 65852.2 (b) upon receiving its first request
the City must accept the application and approve or disapprove
the application pursuant to a set of criteria in sub -section (b),
or, adopt an ordinance within 120 days.
Analysis
Staff presented two alternative ordinances to the .Planning
Commission, one which would give the opportunities for the
creation of second units on properties with single family homes
subject to certain development standards and one which would
preclude the creation of second units, except for as allowed
under current zoning (R -1A, R-2, R -2B, and R-3 zones).
Based on the provisions of the Government Code and the advise of
the City Attorney, the Commission is recommending the adoption of
an ordinance which gives opportunities for second units only in
very limited situations. The basic minimum standards are a
minimum lot size of 6,700 square feet, a maximum unit size of 500
square feet, and a requirement that the second unit can be no
greater than 30% of the size of the main dwelling unit.
Staff is recommending that the maximum unit size for second units
be modified to be 600 square feet, to be consistent with
_1-
6
Municipal Code Section 7-1.5 which sets the minimum dwelling unit
size at 600 square feet. Adoption of the proposed ordinance is
consistent with the provisions of the state law which allow the
imposition of standards and the designation of "areas" where
second units may be permitted. The "areas" that would be
acceptable for these second units are where larger lots exist of
6700 square feet or more (134 lots within the City), and this
number is based on our General Plan to be consistent with the Low
Density classification of 13 units per acre.
Adoption of an ordinance to completely preclude second units
would have to meet the requirement of sub -section (c) of the the
state law and, as such, would have to include strong findings to
support prohibition. Although this may be possible in Hermosa
Beach given our density and small R-1 lot sizes, and since plenty
of opportunities exist in other than R-1 zoning categories for
the creation of second units, the City must find specific
measurable adverse impacts caused by these second units.
Obtaining this type of information requires greater research and
study and could be pursued in the future if desired by the
Planning Commission and/or City Council. The Planning Commission
has already directed staff to initiate that study, but in the
interim the proposed ordinance will place stringent but
reasonable limits on the creation of second units while complying
with state law.
For further analysis and discussion please refer to the attached
Planning Commission staff report.
i'
Respectfully submitted,
1 Ken Robertson Associate Planner
Michael Schubach
P1 ning Direct r
Frederick R.
City Manager
Ferrin
Attachments
1. Proposed Ordinance
2. P.C. Staff Report/Minutes
3. P.C. Resolution 92-59
4. Alternative Resolution presented to the Commission
5. P.C. Resolution of intent
6. Staff memo 9/30/92
7. Staff Review Minutes
8. Government Code Section 65852.2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE 92 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO PROVIDE
OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE CREATION OF SECOND UNITS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 65852.2 OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE AND ADOPTION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION
10,
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on
1992,
to
Commission and
consider
the
recommendation
of the
to receive oral and written testimony
November
Planning
on this
matter and made the following Findings:
A. Pursuant to State Government Code 65852.2(a) the City may
provide for the creation of second units in single-family and
multi -family zone to an existing single-family dwelling;
B. The creation of second units should require conditional use
permit approval and should be consistent with zoning
standards in regards to parking, height, setback, lot
coverage, open space, and shall be subject to a maximum unit
size;
C. Recognizing Hermosa Beach is the most dense community in
terms of housing and population in the South Bay region, and
the 9th most dense in population in L.A. County; the creation
of second units should be limited only to those lots of
sufficient size where a second unit would have minimal impact
on surrounding single-family character;
D. Allowing second units only on lots of over 6,700 square feet
will provide the City's fair share of additional housing in
the region, especially when considered in conjunction with
the City's multiple -family zones, which contain 48% of all
residential lots in the City.
E. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the staff
environmental review committee and this text amendment was
determined to qualify for a negative declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa
Beach, California, does hereby ordain the following amendments to
the zoning ordinance:
SECTION 1 Amend Section 4-2 sub -section 1(a) to read as follows:
(a). Second Units, conditional use permit required. An
owner -occupant may apply for a conditional use permit
for a second unit, subject to review and approval by
the Planning Commission of the design and architecture
of the second unit, if all the following standards are
met:
The unit is not intended for sale and may be rented
The second unit has a maximum floor area of six
hundred (600) square feet but shall not exceed in
any case 30% of the floor area of the existing
dwelling.
The lot contains at least six thousand seven hundred
(6,700) square feet.
Parking shall be provided pursuant to the parking
standards of the zoning ordinance for two-family
dwellings.
All other requirements of the R-1 zone shall be met
for each dwelling unit, and all other applicable
requirements of the zoning ordinance shall be met.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full
force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of
its final passage and adoption.
SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after
the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause
this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a
weekly newspaper of general circulation published and
circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the
manner provided by law.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in
the book of original ordinances of said city, and
shall make minutes of the passage and adoption
thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City
Council at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of
1992, by following vote:
AYES:
NOES: '
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO F RM:
p/pers2ndA
CITY CLERK
CITY ATTORNEY
5.
October 15, 1992
Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach Planning Commission October 20, 1992
SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 92-4
PURPOSE: TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS OR
PROHIBIT SECOND UNITS PURSUANT TO STATE CODE 65852.2
INITIATED BY PLANNING COMMISSION
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the
City Council adopt one of the alternative ordinances described
below.
Background
Section 65852.2 of the State Government Code, Planning and Zoning
Laws, sets forth the requirements for the creation of second
units in single-family and multi -family zones (copy attached).
In sum, Section 65852.2 does the following: a) provides the
opportunity for a city to allow, by ordinance, the creation of
second units in single-family and multi -family zones; b) when
lacking an ordinance, requires a city to approve second unit
requests that meet certain standards (for example, 1200 sq. ft.
or less, conformance with zoning standards related to parking,
setbacks, height, etc.), or; c) requires a city to make findings
regarding health, safety, and welfare impacts to prohibit second
units.
Section 65852.2 (e) defines "second unit" as follows:
"an attached or detached residential dwelling unit which
provides complete indepedent living facilities forone or
more persons. It shall include permanent provisions for
living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on. the same
parcel as the single-family dwelling is situated."
The apparent intent of this law is to address the problem of
housing supply and affordable housing in the State, by
encouraging cities to allow second units to be created from
existing housing stock in existing developed areas, but, if
cities do not explicitly allow second units, to create the
opportunity for any individual that desires a second unit to have
a way to obtain local government approval.
The City has recently received two requests for conditional use
permits for second units in existing single family dwellings.
9
Pursuant to Section 65852.2 (b) upon receiving its first
application the City must accept the application and approve or
disapprove the application pursuant to a set of criteria in
sub -section (b), or, adopt an ordinance pursuant to sub -section
(a) or (c) within 120 days.
Analysis
Staff has prepared two alternative ordinances, pursuant to State
Government 65852.2 (a) and (c).
Alternative A, prepared pursuant to sub -section (a), would give
the opportunities for the creation of second units of a maximum
of 1200 square feet on properties with single family homes
subject to standard parking and zoning requirements and subject
to a minimum lot area requirements (3350 sq. ft. per unit, or a
minimum lot size of 6700 square feet). Also a conditional use
permit would be required pursuant to Article 10 of the zoning
ordianance.
Alternative B, prepared pursuant to sub -section (c) would
preclude the creation of second units, except for as allowed
under current zoning (R -1A, R-2, R -2B, and R-3 zones).
Staff believes that Adoption of Alternative A is consistent with
the provisions of sub -section (a) of the Government Code which
allows the imposition of parking and zoning standards and allows
the designation of "areas" that may be designated where second
units may be permitted. The "areas" that would be acceptable for
these second units are where larger lots exist of 6700 square
feet or more (134 lots within the City), and this number is based
on. our General Plan to be consistent with the Low Density
classification of 13 units per acre. To allow second units on
all lots would not be appropriate as this would virtually convert
every single family area into a two-family zone. Also, to
maintain the single-family character, the size of the second
units should be controlled.
Adoption of alternative B, however, would have to meet the
requirement of sub -section (c) of the the state law and, as such,
would have to include findings "acknowledging that the ordinance
may limit housing opportunities of the region and further contain
findings that specific adverse impacts on the public health,
safety, and welfare...justify adopting the ordinance."
Since Hermosa Beach is a fairly dense city with very small R-1
lots, and since plenty of opportunities exist in other than R-1
zoning categories for the creation of second units, making these
findings is partially possible. However, to find specific
adverse impacts caused by these second units would require some
supportable facts and figures to show that second units would
have adverse impacts. In that regard staff does not believe that
adequate studies have been developed to show, for example, that
allowing second units would cause adverse impacts on traffic
flow, sewer capacity, water supply etc, and would thus caution
that prohibiting second units completely at this time may not be
consistent with the State Law. Obtaining this type of
information or studies could be pursued in the future if desired
by the Planning Commission and/or City Council.
CONCUR:
Michael Schubach
Planning Director
Attachments
1. Proposed Alternative Resolutions
2. P.C. Resolution of intent
3. Staff memo 9/30/92
Respectful) submitted,
Robe ' "on
Associate Planner
Comm. Marks di
conditions requir
ussed with Mr. Schubach the
d and reviewed by the Health D
Comm. Oakes felt ad
area, and was please
inesses increasing.
esthetics of the propo
gested acceptable mate
aluminum, iron, etc. C
barricade be presented as
prior to installation. C
limitation in the use of pa
seating area, equivalent to
MOTION by Comm. Suard, recon
application CUP 92-16 an
recommended by Staff an
railing will be resubm
products within the o
same limitations
quate parking was availab
to see additional "n'
he expressed conce
ed barricade. C
ials be specif
. Oakes re
a Review
. Sua
er pr
ha
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Co
Me
PP
the
ted as
tside seat
as posed upon Ja
anitary
artment.
e within the
ht -life" bus -
regarding the
Di Monda sug-
ed; i.e.s twisted
uested the proposed
em to the Commission
d suggested imposing a
ucts within the outside
imposed upon Java Man.
by Comm. Marks, to APPROVE
92-6 with the conditions
anges as discussed; the
Review Item and paper
ng area will have the
a Man.
ne
one
None
Di Monda, Marks,
ekes, Suard, Chmn.
Chmn. Me stated this application had been approved;
subject o appeal within 10 days to the Cit Council.
Tany• Bode, Hermosa Beach resident, press ted to the
Co ission correspondence and videos for its =view prior
to the next scheduled meeting.
.NTS FO ' THE • E • T ON OF
PTATE GOVERNMENT CODE 65852.2.
Mr. Schubach stated State Government Code Section 65852.2
set forth the requirements and defined "second units" with
the apparent intent to address the housing supply and
affordability problem by encouraging cities to allow
second units in existing developed areas. If cities do
not allow these units, the opportunity is created •for
local residents to obtain local government approval. Mr.
Schubach noted two C.U.P. requests for second units in
single-family dwelling areas had been received, which must
be approved/denied pursuant to set criteria, or adopt an
ordinance within 120 days.
Mr. Schubach stated Staff had prepared two alternative
ordinances, presented as Alternatives A and B of which he
detailed, as well as the methods of application for each,
for the Commission. Comm. Di Monda commented upon the
P.C.' Minutes 10-20-92
energy given by Staff to this proposed ordinance, which
creates the ability to turn some sections into multi-
family areas, rather than investigation findings to pre-
clude the second units from occurring. He asked if the
General Plan needed to be amended; noted the City's
density, parking problems and impact upon City services.
He also asked if the City Council was aware of this item,
why nine years had passed prior to this item being
addressed, and commented the Commission should have had
the opportunity to review a pamphlet covering this subject
and issued by the League of Cities. Comm. Di Monda stated
this item was not initiated by the Planning Commission,
but that it was being presented again. Comm. Di Monda
expressed concern that the Commission would be reacting to
an application which is arguable as to if it falls under
the ordinance, already, feeling it might allow those
people with "bootleg" units to legitimatize them. He felt
the issue was being rushed, and perhaps in the wrong
direction.
Mr. Schubach stated the item was initiated by Planning
Staff; the correction would be made prior to submittal to
City Council. He stated little energy had been expended,
since .this was an amendment to the Code allowance, which
required allowance be made for "granny units". He
explained the hardship in assuring the occupant was over
62 years of age, noting if the person was 61, they did not
qualify. Other cities had felt age limitation was not a
good idea and had initiated appropriate ordinances. He
stated Staff was simply eliminating the section was
stated, "62 years of age," changed "640 square feet", to
"700 square feet" to qualify one -bedroom units. He stated
the current terminology in Section B could cause serious
problems if taken to court. Mr. Schubach then explained
the action time limits and the procedures necessary to
process this amendment, noting the lack of time. in which
to make the necessary findings. He felt current actions
would not exclude future opportunities to review the
issues and take appropriate actions. .
Comm. Suard and Mr. Schubach discussed the provisions for
bachelor -type units within the R-2 and R-3 Zones versus
the proposed unit space of 700 square feet.
Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Merl at 8:25 p.m.
Betty Martin, 257 27th Street, requested the terminology
be changed, to which Mr. Schubach responded that it had
been and that she had an "old" copy. She commented the
tenants were supposed to be related to the property owner,
to which Mr. Lee responded single-family resident tenants
did not have to be "blood" related. He noted the City
P.C. Minutes 10-20-92
could include provision that only owner -occupant could
make application for the second unit, which would provide
restriction.
No one else wished to speak regarding this item, and Chmn.
Merl closed the Public Hearing at 8:28 p.m.
Comm. Oakes confirmed with Mr. Schubach the approximate
location of the impacted lots and that parking require-
ments must be met by the entire lot if a second unit was
built.
Comm. Suard determined the City had approximately 52% R-1
lots, other cities' "norm" was a lot higher, and suggested
this would be a reason for exemption. Mr. Schubach noted
the risk was in being challenged, defining the particular
item requirements for prohibition of second units.
Mr. Lee stated State Law required specific finding of
adverse impacts be made, which included specific factual
support. He stated the ordinances are sent to the Dept.
of Housing and Community Development and closely reviewed
by housing applicants. He explained the difficulty in
developing those findings within the short time frame.
Mr. Lee underscored the point that the opportunity to
develop an ordinance is lost if not completed within the
specific time limit, which had prompted Staff to take
action on this item. He discussed the possibility of
readopting another ordinance with the specific findings
requirements, noting the review of the second units would
probably be under the State provisions. He had found that
the Appellant Court was usually very harsh on cities for
taking actions which would lessen housing opportunities
and/or prevent second units. Mr. Lee stated the purpose
of the suggested terminology was to make it legally
defensible. He recommended adoption of an ordinance with
the "most teeth" at this time, stating the Commission must
ask itself if the standards were reasonable and tough
enough.
Comm. Oakes felt adverse effects would be created if
second units were allowed, which would perhaps justify
exemption. She stated Hermosa Beach was a small city with
small lots. She suggested higher numbers be used. Mr.
Schubach stated findings would be necessary in order to
implement Comm. Oakes suggestion, and that perhaps the
courts would find it unreasonable. Chmn. Merl concurred,
stating the findings would need to be extremely specific.
Comm. Di Monda compared Beverly Hills to Hermosa Beach,
commenting that city did not allow people sleeping and
camping on the street, truck trailers parked on the street
and had homes located on 6 to 20 acres. He expressed
P.C. Minutes 10-20-92
1/ -
concern that the report was insubstantial, while the
impact on the City's quality of life would be high. He
strongly opposed adoption of the Text Amendment, request-
ing a comparison of other cities defense against this same
problem, as well as notation as to which were successful,
not successful and why. He also discussed with Mr. Lee
the City's options as to future actions if the amendment
were approved. Mr. Lee stated he did not see prevention
from adopting an initial ordinance under Subdivision A,
and subsequently, after Staff has had adequate time to
develop specific adverse impacts that could be created by
second units, amend the Municipal Code to preclude second
units. Mr. Schubach stated most cities had adopted Sec-
tion A and expressed concern that, with the short notice,
findings would be legally defensible.
Comm. Marks clarified that the State would overrule the
City's Master Plan and Zoning Plan, allowing over-
population, to which Messrs. Schubach and Lee agreed,
giving examples of previous requirements by State
agencies. Comms. Di Monda, Oakes and Mr. Schubach then
discussed the impact upon reasonable, required open space.
Comm. Di Monda requested that Staff investigate the
actions taken by Manhattan Beach regarding open space
requirements. Mr. Lee stated that if the Commission were
to adopt Subdivision C, it instruct Staff on a priority
basis, to investigate and present findings within the time
limit.
Comm. Suard suggested obtaining an advisory opinion from
the State regarding the excessive multi -unit problem,
other cities be queried, and work on a Subsection B
proposal. Mr. Lee felt the State's response would be that
it was a legislative decision based upon individual facts
related to the community, which the City must supply.
Comm. Suard suggested the request be made. He felt the
State's Section 5, limiting to 30% of living area, could
be added to the "700 square foot" Section, resulting in a
state- ment,-"The second unit has a maximum floor area of
700 square feet and cannot exceed 30% of the existing
living area."
Comm. Marks suggested this item be used as a means of
leverage to clean Hermosa Avenue, illegal second units
would be made to comply or close. Mr. Lee stated the
question as to whether or not "bootlegs" (which are not a
legal usage) are second units can be addressed through the
local ordinance; a code enforcement issue. Comm. Marks
noted that many "bootleg" units are separately metered and
easily identified.
P.C. Minutes 10-20-92
MOTION by Comm. Oakes to ADOPT TA 92-4, Text Amendment,
Alternative A, with addition of from the State Code
Section B.1, "the unit is not intended for sale and may be
rented," Section 5, "any increase in the floor area of an
attached second unit shall not exceed 30% of the existing
living area" and change Subsection A first paragraph,
third line to read, "...unit to an existing single -tamely
dwelling". Motion failed due to lack of a second.
Comm. Di Monda hoped that after passing Alternative A,
Alternative B would be reviewed. He stated the
Condominium Code established a limit of 900 square feet,
rather than the 700 square feet being recommended for this
action. Mr. Schubach stated another 700 square feet
provision was in the Condominium Code. Comm. Di Monda
stated he wished the square footage to be 500. Mr.
Schubach stated if 700 square feet was required it would
be chanced prior to presentation to City Council. Comm.
Di Monda referenced State Ordinance, Line Item #C.7,
noting the architectural review was in the Condominium
Code but not the R-1 Zone second units. Mr. Sohubach
agreed, stating it would be covered through the C.U.P.
Mr. Lee suggested architectural review in the R-1 Zone be
included as a provision, if the Commission so wished.
Comm. Oakes agreed to an amendment to the motion.
AMENDED MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Merl,
to ADOPT TA 92-4, Text Amendment, Alternative A, with
addition of from the State Code Section B.1, "the unit is
not intended for sale and may be rented," Section 5, "any
increase in the floor area of an attached second unit
shall not exceed 30% of the existing living area", change
Subsection A first paragraph, third line to read, "...unit
to an existing single-family dwelling" and include a
provision to require architectural review relating to
second units within the R-1 Zone.
AYES: Comm. Di Monda, Marks, Oakes, Suard, Chmn.
Marl
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION by Comm. Di Monda that the Planning Commission send
a letter to the City Council asking it to reconsider the
open space study forwarded to it by the Planning
Commission; specifically pointing out this Ordinance.
Mr. Schubach stated that had been already included at the
Council's next scheduled meeting, asking that the study be
done. Comm. Di Monda requested a letter be sent stating
that if a percentage of open space is required, that the
P.C. Minutes 10-20-92
single-family home character be preserved, because of this
ordinance. The Commission concurred with this request.
AMENDED MOTION by Comm. Di Honda, seconded by Comm. Suard,
to direct Staff to present to the Commission ordinances
cast by other cities (Carmel, Beverly Hills, Santa
Barbara) that have attempted to deal with this issue,
include the Dept. of Housing and Community Development
opinion and contact the League of California Cities. No
objections, so ordered.
A break was taken from 9:20 to 9:30 p.m.
16 17. 10, 19 -- Rxxsusro
CONDITQ4 AI, USE PERMITS FOR FOUR TWO -UNIT
et
Mr. Schub h
extension by
and City Counc
the applicant had
cing. He stated t
approved for building
remaining obligation b
payment. He explained the
make by minute order.
stated Staff recomm
inute order, discusse
action relative t
xperienced dif
plans ha
ermit
'ng
There were no questions
Merl invited members
wished to speak relat
Comm. Suard noted
designed to a 35
previous present
tible with the
to the inten
reference.
first exte
FOR EXPIRED
CONDOMINIUMS.
ded a six-month
previous Commission
this item and stated
culty obtaining finan-
been plan checked and
issuance, with the only
the building permit *fee
indings the Commission could
f Staff,
the audien
g to this item.
d at 9:37 p.m., Chmn.
to speak. No one
at all three proposed
et height. Comm. Di Monda
tion made which established it
urrounding area, and the plans di
on. Comm. Oakes felt this was import
Comm. Marks established this would be
ion.
ructures were
eferenced a
ascompa-
onform
t to
he
MOTION •y Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Chmn. Merl, to
APPRO : Staff's recommendation to extend the C.U.P. for
six'.nths, to January 22, 1993, by minute order.
AYES: Comm. Di Honda, Marks, Oakes, Suard, Chmn.
Merl
NOISE: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
P.C. Minutes 10-20-92
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION 92-59
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
TEXT TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE CREATION OF SECOND UNITS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 65852.2 OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE AND
ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on
October 20, 1992, to consider oral and written testimony and made
the following Findings:
A. Pursuant to State Government Code 65852.2(a) the City may
provide for the creation of second units in single-family and
multi -family zone to an existing single-family dwelling;
B. The creation of second units should require conditional use
permit approval and should be consistent with zoning
standards in regards to parking, height, setback, lot
coverage, open space, and shall be subject to a maximum unit
size;
C. Recognizing Hermosa Beach is the most dense community in
terms of housing and population in the South Bay region, and
the 9th most dense in population in L.A. County; the creation
of second units should be limited only to those lots of
sufficient size where a second unit would have minimal impact
on surrounding single-family character;
D. Allowing second units only on lots of over 6,700 square feet
will provide the City's fair share of additional housing in
the region, especially when considered in conjunction with
the City's multiple -family zones, which contain 48% of all
residential lots in the City.
/. S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
E. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the staff
environmental review committee and this text amendment was
determined to qualify for a negative declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California, recommends amendment of the zoning
ordinance text as follows:
SECTION 1 Amend Section 4-2 sub -section 1(a) to read as follows:
(a). Second Units, conditional use permit required. An
owner -occupant may apply for a conditional use permit
for a second unit, subject to review and approval by
the Planning Commission of the design and architecture
of the second unit, if all the following standards are
met:
The unit is not intended for sale and may be rented
The second unit has a maximum floor area of five
hundred (500) square feet and shall not exceed 30%
of the floor area of the existing dwelling
The lot contains at least six thousand seven hundred
(6,700) square feet.
Parking shall be provided pursuant to the parking
standards of the zoning ordinance for two-family
dwellings.
All other requirements of the R-1 zone shall be met
for each dwelling unit, and all other applicable
requirements of the zoning ordinance shall be met.
VOTE: AYES: Comm. DiMonda, Marks, Oakes, Suard, Chmn.Merl
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 92-59 is a true
and complete record of the action taken by the Planning
Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their
regular meeting of October 20, 1992. ,,
Michael Schubach, Secretary
Rod Merl, Chairman
(/- -Y' Z.
Date
84 cK cR avNn
MATER/A[
['7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ALTERNATIVE B
RESOLUTION 92-59
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE TO
PROHIBIT OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE CREATION OF SECOND UNITS PURSUANT
TO SECTION 65852.2 OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE AND ADOPTION OF
AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on
October 20, 1992, to consider oral and written testimony and made
the following Findings:
A. Pursuant to State Government Code 65852.2(c) the City may
prohibitr the creation of second units otherwise allowed for
in Section 65852(b) of the Governement Code in single-family
and multi -family zone in conjunction with an existing
single-family dwelling;
B.
C. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the staff
environmental review committee and this project was
determined to qualify for a negative declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of
Hermosa Beach, California, recommends adoption of an ordinance to
prohibit second units.
VOTE: AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
•
....:.:�,%4is�u.-2:i+=..7•w:/.i�.:�. .:'ti =.. `"C``K'AL"JS$:+G�:w...!►
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 92-59 is a true
and complete record of the action taken by the Planning
Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their
regular meeting of October 20, 1992.
Rod Merl, Chairman Michael Schubach, Secretary
Date
p/pers2ndB
<?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C C t C
RESOLUTION P.C. 92-56
A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO INITIATE CONSIDERATION OF A TEXT
AMENDMENT TO PROHIBIT OR ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CREATION
OF SECOND UNITS PURSUANT TO STATE GOVERNMENT CODE 65852.2
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public meeting on
October 6, 1992, and made the following findings:
A. Section 65852.2 of the California Planning and Zoning Law
states requires cities to accept applications for conditional
use permits for second units on single-family lots, and
requires the City to grant approval of such a request if it
meets the criteria of sub -section (b);
B. Sub -section (a) of said State Code allows local governments
to establish their own ordinances regarding the creation -of
second units and sub -section (c) allows prohibition of second
units for health, safety and welfare reasons;
C. Given the high density and unique features of the City of
Hermosa Beach, it is necessary to establish our own set of
regulations regarding the creation of second units, and not
be subject to the general statewide requirements;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission
of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, directs staff to
conduct the environmental assessment and set the public hearing
for purpose of establishing regulations regarding the creation of
second units.
VOTE: AYES: Comms. DiMonda, Oakes, Marks, Merl
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 92-56 is a true
and complete record of the action taken by the Planning
Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their
regular meeting of October 15, 19 /7 /, 7/
Rod Merl, Chairman Michael Schubach, Secretary
•°T -v - %2, Date p/persint
-2°
•
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning
Commission
FROM: Ken Robertson, Associate Planner �!,
SUBJECT: Resolution of Intent to Establish Regulation
Regarding the Creation of Second Units
DATE: September 30, 1992
Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution of intent to
begin the process of preparing a text amendment regarding second
units.
Section 65852.2 of the State Government Code, Planning and Zoning
Laws, sets forth the requirements for the creation of second
units in single-family and multi -family zones (copy attached).
In sum, Section 65852.2 does the following: a) provides the -
opportunity for a city to allow, by ordinance, the creation of
second units in single-family and multi -family zones; b) when
lacking an ordinance, requires a city to approve second unit
requests that meet certain standards (for example, 1200 sq. ft.
or less, conformance with zoning standards related to setbacks,
height, etc.), and; c) requires a city to make findings regarding
health, safety, and welfare impacts to prohibit second units.
The apparent intent of this law is to address the problem of
housing supply and affordable housing in the State, by
encouraging cities to allow second units to be created from
existing housing stock in existing developed areas, but, if
cities do not allow second units, to create the opportunity for
any individual that desires a second unit to have a way to obtain
local government approval.
Recently, the Planning Department has received a request for a
second unit in an existing dwelling in an R-1 zone, and has been
advised by the City Attorney to begin preparation of an
ordinance. Staff beleives the unusually high density and related
parking and congestion problems in Hermosa Beach probably
justifies regulations to preclude second units in most
circumstances. Without such an ordinance, the City might be
forced to approve a second unit in an R-1 zone.
CONCUR*
Michael Schubach,
Planning Director
Attachments
1. Proposed Resolution of Intent
2. Section 65852.2 (a), (b) and (c)
p/memo5
Saturday and 9-5 on Sundays.
4. More detailed plans are submitted.
Second by Captain Bruccoleri. No objection, so ordered.
PROJECT'T.A. 92-4
Text amendment to prohibit or establish requirements of the
creation of second units pursuant to State Government Code
Section 65852.2.
Mr. Robertson explained that this state law provides that single
family residences can convert part of the home to a second unit
unless a prohibitive ordinance is adopted by the city.
Motion by Mr. Robertson to recommend a negative declaration.
Second by Mr. Williams. No objection, so ordered.
Meeting Adjourned.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and
complete record of the action taken by the Staff Review Committee
at their regular meeting of October 8, 1992.
/v/2
Ken Robertson, Planning Associate Date
The Planning and Zoning Law
Fee authority
Protection for solar
energy systems
Establishment of
zoning districts
Uniformity
"Granny" housing
C
•
riles and regulations.
(f) Counties and cities may adopt a schedule of fees for applications for compliance with this section
suffict nt to recover their reasonable costs of carrying out this section. Those fees shall be used only
for themplementation of this section.
(g) As used in this section:
(1) "Acutely hazardous material" means any material as defined pursuant to subdivision (a) of
Section 25532'qf the Health and Safety Code.
(2) "Administering agency" means an agency designated pursuant to Section 25502 of the Health
and Safety Code.
(3) "Hazardous aisemissions" means emissions into the ambient air of air contaminants which have
been identified as a t\ic air contaminant by the State Air Resources Boardior by the air pollution
control officer for the ju�.isdiction in which the project is located. As determined by the air pollution
control officer, hazardous'air emissions also means emissions into the ambient air of any substance
identified in subdivisions (a)\:i (f), inclusive, of Section 44321 of the Health and Safety Code.
(h) Any misrepresentation of information required by this section shall be grounds for denial,
jec
suspension, or revocation of prot approval or permit issuance The owner or authorized agent
required to comply with this sectioit'hall notify all future occupants of their potential duty to comply
with the requirements of Sections 2555, 25533, 25534 of thefHealth and Safety Code.
(i) This section shall not apply to apptjcations solely foryesidential construction.
and added by`Stats.1991, Ch. 1183.)
my shallot enact an ordinance which has the effect of
f solar energy systems other than for the preservation or
jt ition shall be applicable to charter cities since the
rgy, such as solar energy and energy conservation
(Added by Stats. 1988, Ch. 1589; Repea
65850.5. The legislative body of any city or c
prohibiting or of unreasonably restricting the us
protection of the public health or safety. This pr
promotion of the use of nonfossil fuel sources of,e
measures, is a matter of statewide concern.
This section shall not apply to ordinances w ich impos
However, it is the policy of the state to promo a and encoura
obstacles thereto. Accordingly, reasonableestrictions on a so
do not significantly increase the cost of a system or significant)
an alternative system of comparable ost and efficiency.
For the purposes of this section, "dolor energy system" shall have th
801.5 of the Civil Code.
(Added by Stats. 1978, Ch. 154.)
65851. For such purposes the leislative body may divide a county, a city, or po
number, shape and area it/deems best suited to carry out the purpose of this
(Added by Stats. 197, Ch.1880.)
65852. All such regula,j.ions shall be uniform for each class or kind of building or use f land throughout each
zone, but the regulation in one type of zone may differ from those in other types of nes.
(Repealed 71 added by Stats. 1965, Ch.1880.)
65852.1. NotwihstandingSection65906,anycity,includingachartercity,county,orcityan ounty may issue
a zoning variance, special use permit, or conditional use permit for a dwelling unit to be consconsti'ttted, or which
is attached to or detached from, a primary residence on a parcel zoned for a single-family res •ence, if the
dwellinjunit is intended for the sole occupancy of one adult or two adult persons who are 62 y . of age
or ov r, and the area of floor space of the attached dwelling unit does not exceed 30 percent of the , xisting
liv g area or the area of the floor space of the detached dwelling unit does not exceed 1,200 square eel.
This section shall not be construed to limit the requirements of Section 65852.2, or the power of 1. al
governments to permit second units.
asonable restrictions on solar energy systems.
the use of solar energy systems and to remove
ar energy system are those restrictions which
ecrease its efficiency, or which allow for
same meaning as set forth in Section
ons thereof, into zones of the
pter.
I. •. I
Provisions for
second unit
ordinances/findings
65852.2. (a) Any local agency may, by ordinance, provide for the creation of second units in single-family and
multifamily residential zones consistent with all of the following provisions:
(1) Areas may be designated within the jurisdiction of the local agency where second units may be
permitted.
(2).The designation of areas may be based on criteria, which may include, but are not limited to, the
adequacy of water and sewer services and the impact of second units on traffic flow.
(3) Standards may be imposed on second units which include, but are not limited to, parking, height,
setback, lot coverage, architectural review, and maximum size of a unit.
(4) A local agency may find that second units do not exceed the allowable density for the lot upon which
the second unit is located, and that second units area residential use that is consistent with the existing general
56 • 1992 Planning, Zoning, and Development Laws
-- 23-
i
The Planning and Zoning Law
plan and zoning designation for the lot.
• (5) The second units created shall not be considered in the application of any local ordinance, policy, or
program to limit residential growth. 1
(6) A local agency may establish a process for the issuance of a conditional use permit for second units.
(b) When a local agency which has not adopted an ordinance governing second units in accordance with
subdivision (a) or (c), receives its first application on or after July 1, 1983, for a conditional use permit
pursuant to this subdivision, the local agency shall accept the application and approve or disapprove the
application pursuant to this subdivision unless it adopts an ordinance in accordance with subdivision (a) or
(c) within 120 days after receiving the application. Notwithstanding Section 65901, every local agency shall
grant a special use or a conditional use permit for the creation of a second unit if the second unit complies
with all of the following:
(1) The unit is not intended for sale and may be rented.
(2) The lot is zoned for single-family or multifamily use.
(3) The lot contains an existing single-family dwelling.
(4) The second unit is either attached to the existing dwelling and located within the living area of the
existing dwelling or detached from the existing dwelling and located on the same lot as the existing dwelling.
(5) Any increase in the floor area of an attached second unit shall not exceed 30 percent of the existing living
area.
(6) The total area of floor space for a detached second unit shall not exceed 1,200 square feet.
(7) Any construction shall conform to height, setback, lot coverage, architectural review, site plan review,
fees, charges, and other zoning requirements generally applicable to residential construction in the zone in
which the property is located.
(8) Local building code requirements which apply to detached dwellings, as appropriate.
(9) Approval by the local health officer where a private sewage disposal system is being used, if required.
No other local ordinance, policy, or regulation shall be the basis for the denial of a building permit or a use
permit under this subdivision.
This subdivision establishes the maximum standards that local agencies shall use to evaluate proposed
second units on lots zoned for residential use which contain an existing single-family dwelling. No additional
standards, other than those provided in this subdivision or subdivision (a), shall be utilized or imposed, except
that a local agency may require an applicant for a permit issued pursuant to this subdivision to be an owner -
occupant.
This section does not limit the authority of local agencies to adopt less restrictive requirements for the
creation of second units.
No changes in zoning ordinances or other ordinances or any changes in the general plan shall be required
to implement this subdivision. Any local agency may amend its zoning ordinance or general plan to
incorporate the policies, procedures, or other provisions applicable to the creation of second units if these
provisions are consistent with the limitations of this subdivision.
A second unit which conforms to the requirements of this subdivision shall not be considered to exceed the
allowable density for the lot upon which it is located, and shall be deemed to be a residential use which is
consistent with the existing general plan and zoning designations for the lot. The second units shall'not be
considered in the application of any local ordinance, policy, or program to limit residential growth.
(c) No local agency shall adopt an ordinance which totally precludes second units within single-family and
multifamily zoned areas unless the ordinance contains findings acknowledging that the ordinance may limit
housing opportunities of the region and further contains findings that specific adverse impacts on the public
health, safety, and welfare that would result from allowing second units within single-family and multifamily
zoned areas justify adopting the ordinance.
(d) Local agencies shall submit a copy of the ordinances adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) or (c) to the
Department of Housing and Community Development within 60 days after adoption.
(e) As used in this section, the following terms mean:
(1) "Living area," means the interior habitable area of a dwelling unit including basements and attics but
does not include a garage or any accessory structure.
(2) "Local agency" means a city, county, or city and county, whether general law or chartered.
(3) "Second unit" means an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit which provides complete
independent living facilities for one or more persons. It shall include permanent provisions for living,
sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as the single-family dwelling is situated.
Note: Stats. 1986, Ch. 156, also reads:
SEC. 2. This act shall become operative April 1, 1987.
(Added by Stats. 1982, Ch. 1440. Effective July 1,1983; Amended by Stats. 1986, Ch. 156; Amended by
Stats. 1990, Ch. 1150.)
Standards to
evaluate proposed
second residential
units
Necessary findings
for ordinance
prohibiting second
units
Definitions
Timing
1992 Planning, Zoning, and Development Laws • 57
i
} I
Honorable Mayor and'Members
of the Hermosa Beach City Council
91)-4"1/4-1
November 4, 1992
City Council Meeting
of November 10, 1992
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL GUIDANCE ON THE SCOPE OF THE CITY YARD
RELOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY
Background:
Oil drilling and recovery operations, even in the initial testing
phase, will require the Public Works Department to vacate the
present City Yard as its physical constraints preclude concurrent
or collocated oil and public works operations. Given the
requirement to relocate immediately upon the initiation of drilling
the first test well, the City must have a prepared and operational
relocation site. Though still a significant ways from the
initiation of testing, it is time to begin the planning process for
the possible move. This issue has been before Council on several
occasions. At the Council meeting of June 26, 1990, the Council
authorized staff to advertise for a proposal for a preliminary site
investigation for the relocation of the City Yard. Two sites were
to be investigated, one at the Community Center and the other at
South School. Since that Council Meeting the City took action to
retain an architectural, engineering and planning firm to perform
the study; however, in anticipation of a change in the already
limited menu of study sites, notice to proceed was withheld.
Shortly thereafter the Council adopted a Parks, Recreation, and
Community Resources Commission recommendation to eliminate South
School from the list of locations to be studied. Short of further
Council guidance, the City has only one viable relocation site to
study.
Analysis:
The Macpherson Oil Company has given the City $21,000 to perform a
site study and plan. Staff is of the opinion that the site
selection process should include more than one site for
consideration. The only site currently in the investigation
inventory is the Community Center. This location is rife with
limitations and complications, and although in comparison with
other available sites in the City, it may be the best, we will not
be certain unless we commission a more comprehensive site study
which investigates all potentially feasible sites. After
considerable discussion and some initial analysis, the staff has
submitted the following as a preliminary listing of potential sites
for a feasibility analysis:
1. Industrial Yard Space to the immediate south
of the Redondo -Hermosa border.
2. The Body Glove Building and property next to
the City Yard.
1
3. South School (approximately one quarter of the
space would be used as a replacement site).
4. Community Center.
5. The Mini -Storage lot south of City Hall.
6. The Hospital District Property on PCH between
16th and 21st Streets.
7. Hermosa View School.
8. North School.
Though several of these may quickly prove infeasible, it is more
prudent to make a selection based upon a one time, broad comparison
as opposed to a selection forced by the incremental elimination of
one site after another based upon objections raised, over an
extended period, by those affected should the site in which they
have interest be selected. -
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the Council provide staff guidance on the
specific sites it wishes to be considered in a site feasibility
study. It is envisioned that the Request For Proposal, that will
follow, will ask the consultant to rank sites in order of
feasibility. At that time, Council will have the opportunity to
eliminate sites it feels are unacceptable to the City for reasons
which might not have been taken into consideration by the
investigation and feasibility analysis team.
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager
FRF/ld
T6ivi '1/`4
5 ( Law-%aN 0;52 i3 C'i.
.J2, ►,,Q1j \ C frc__.c c -) CIS C\ .y . .
0 A 1 A tZ.e ?o r isj-cc y -es
ix/RA t 3 c>\ --t12-/-*L 0 n
I v 1(a w`u +,)1J�, s `. _ h -e. s C -e-Xj t 5 4-
,*1-4) L/cA.d.:GL2s L.vsl-- u. -)M C3‘x-
?(Ar-Lt A -s _ b --4c /-.2.7 " -
'cc/
Gj 'I?eS N.Q_,<S
A ,LA, A.1.4.,1-4.. to i\s.k ss --)Q5
r� o d-ksjz.-%?14
-4-ll,e_ -eq10 refq.cL.- "-s
c7 �
10 '2\ 11_ ap,(;(1 vAgs c› -g
rc-\ A -DR rc —1c) • a ( .
k a_ 0,4 es,)
TL .LI0 5,--.c_c-e 55-C-41'ris'k
(orc,
Lie_c
C
r
cpp-i-\----re\ kocli
V`Act c, Li A -N ik,4 5 )
Lhei 4—`) LIAKSrG;k1Qrs
) -
_5 :(
r
yt-k/ i6. -ss -s y .,2k4 ) •)- •s
_p-cDsvi v.v-P --PL6k4-- vv-\ ki-fe Kds f\c-e
iv)c-4--e-J_. 2t) rvIvv‘
e_c-15()—CmC42 I( C..c.c;55 11H Di.;ve
; Li•
c�,►�-' /4.44e, �� 6-e i. -4./ 1s ?,./,1 1,-c 5 k -f -s
„„1,Vc....,,A--,0 Ev,-)‘.) ; C, I
\,./1/4.)-() k.A-A--Z-e_.ted-
�' I" oN
izcA (
(� \-pia J,AcA-;.-,-)
ii;
be -N \--0r.t k-11-10.
U4-) f-- "a►1
tJ N� 0'4 uJ . c./� 5
w1-.:G,L 5 -eS
c.0O3.5 to, N-} 1
jc.r.1-ci._) IS 2 /L J Q9 C i ,QK
• 1
• A-- �` -e .--> J N -0-�-a-v ( ` v ► (S Z ► r'ec i C
-pi°
S
e • i)- ( / Lcc i—z7 S
} tai
4-6 ct/4L c G 4 t .eF S r -b 9 '� �G "_t), 40‘,./(-
6-04,..i/\/
9 4-/-1)\ � i ,�.� ? � c,v of 5
1 0_41ke
cj,\ 11-qci
1-0 -kle-e
C Tbe-czrtL
- • d sr.A_Q Qve•tA A-
_ A-5
e_ 0;
P r'T--cvsL 1--f
ot4
(7\GLN d ),GJ
f
v• -s /Gicz o+ s
-e Cr -0 L i hp,
de? L I ” of kvi_Qcy-f;k751,)
n-Ol/
L'7 t•-rcg
12-k s A -J1
L,64 -e a -Pk 0?/14 6)1 L -x
OIL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION
FROM AN URBAN DRILLBITE
VOLUME IV
RESPONSES TO PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS
ON THE
PREPARED BY
PREPARED FOr-
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
YT ULTRABYEITEMS
ENVIRONMENTAL BERVICEB
18845 VON KAP MAN AVENUE _
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 82714
w
Atgri
a4
so
4
-
Indeper
t..: . I. . • • • •
t make its own CE•
+. •2_•:
•
rand
Santa
Boca 1
C +
886, 896-98.)
n
s section 15
a re ect=.
is infeasible and
e. ( esource I. e
ormation om.
untv (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d
r. r �.r (:EjA Tonics Of Interest
1. Subsequent EIR's: Proposed projects often are not
static concepts. On occasion, they are changed
�°
y j after an EIR or Negative Declaration is prepared
��and approved by the Lead AgencFurther
U' \ Bnvi rnnmPntal reyteW i8 require i f B�bstantl,.l
- the ro ect or substantial
s--.i�svect rp th
-+ +�: which the •ro ect is bein•
rtaken which will require major rev s ons of
the EIR. Also, If new information becomes--- - .,
available, which was not and could not have been
nown a a e e
complete, urt er rev ew s requ r . (PRC
S 21166.) Guidelines sections 15162-15164 discuss
three types of supplemental review documents.
a. Public participation is essential to CEQA
compliance. Changing a project
substantially after an EIR was prepay
effectively deprives the public 'of any
-m u assessment of the actualproject
chosen by the agency.! (Concerned Citizens
of Costa Mesa v. 32nd District Agricultural
Association (1986) 42 Ca1.3d 929, 938
(amphitheatre enlarged and redesigned); City
of San Jose v. Great Oaks Water Co. (1987)
192 Cal.App.3d 1005 (source of water supply
changed for industrial development
project).)
b. If a lawsuit is filed challenging a Lead
Agency's failure to prepare a subsequent EIR,
the standard of review for the court is
whether the administrative record as a whole
contains substantial evidence to support a
determination that the changes in the project
were not so "substantial' as to require
"major' modifications of the BIR. (Bowman v.
City of Petaluma (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 1065,
1075.)
34.
I
�tlf" systins
This document is intended to provide supplemental information
to the City of Hermosa Beach such that an informed decision can be made
on the proposed urban drillsite project. It should be noted, however,
that additional environmental analysis may be necessary once it is
finally determined that the maintenance yard will need to be relocated
(after completion of project exploratory operations), and to which
site, in order to provide more detailed information on the potential
impacts of the new City Maintenance Yard.
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
t
Project Description
A portion of the existing City Maintenance Yard site will be
used for drilling operations by Macpherson Oil Company during the
exploration phase of the proposed project. The western half of the
site will be graded until level, excavated for the well cellars and
utilized for a drilling operation and temporary production operation.
There will be a temporary disruption to the maintenance yard activities
on approximately one-half of the site covering a time period of ten
(10) to sixteen (16) months. The specific existing on-site functions
that will be disrupted and may need to be temporarily relocated are
listed below.
Employee parking along Sixth Street will be eliminated. This
includes both the parking lot at the southwest corner of the
maintenance yard, and any parallel parking south of the
wooden structure along Sixth Street.
The bulk storage for sand, gravel, and road material will be
eliminated.
The storage of the street sweeper, and the street sweeper
dumpsters will be eliminated.
3
Upon the successful completion of the exploratory drilling
and testing phase of the project, construction of the permanent oil
drilling and production facilities on the City Maintenance Yard site
will begin. The remaining primary existing site facilities will be
permanently relocated off-site during this phase of the project. These
facilities and functions include:
City vehicle garage and repair facility
Animal control and holding kennel
Butler Building with office space
Maintenance and heavy equipment storage building
Trash and storage bin areas
Fuel tanks, cargo containers, etc.
Stockpiles
For purposes of this assessment, it is assumed that the
maintenance yard operations would be relocated to either the Community
Center site east of the Hermosa Beach City Hall across Valley Drive and
Ardmore Avenue, or the Self -Storage site directly adjacent to the
southern end of City Hall across Bard Street and along Valley Drive.
The Community Center site is bordered by Pacific Coast
Highway on the east, Ardmore Avenue on the west, Pier Avenue on the
north and residential uses to the south. Eleventh Street extends west
into the site from Pacific Coast Highway and provides the primary
access. Commercial uses exist south of Eleventh Street along Pacific
Coast Highway. The Community Center site is currently occupied by the
main community center building, two groups of outdoor tennis courts,
a landscaped park area along the Pacific Coast Highway frontage, and
several parking areas.
It is contemplated by the Public Works Department that should
the City Maintenance Yard be relocated to the Community Center site the
5
■
■
OIL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION
FROM AN URBAN-DRILLSITE
VOLUME IV
RESPONSES TO PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS
ON THE
M
a
PREPARED FOP
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PREPARED BY
U LTRABYSTE M S
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
16845 VON KARMAN-AVENUE
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92714
1111
A portion of the existing City Maintenance Yard site will be
111 used for drilling- operations by Macpherson Oil Company during the
exploration phase of the proposed project. The western half of the
site will be graded until level, excavated for the well cellars and
utilized for a drilling operation and temporary production operation.
There will be a temporary disruption to the maintenance yard activities
11 on approximately one-half of the site covering a time period of ten
(10) to sixteen (16) months. The specific existing on-site functions
that will be disrupted and may need to be temporarily relocated are
listed below.
I
This document is intended to provide supplemental information
to the City of Hermosa Beach such that an informed decision can be made
on the proposed urban drillsite project. It should be noted, however,
that additional environmental analysis may be necessary once it is
finally determined that the maintenance yard will need to be relocated
(after completion of project exploratory operations), and to which
site, in order to provide more detailed information on the potential
impacts of the new City Maintenance Yard.
Pro.iect Description
■
■
Employee parking along Sixth Street will be eliminated. This
includes both the parking lot at the southwest corner of the
maintenance yard, and any parallel parking south of the
wooden structure along Sixth Street.
The bulk storage for sand, gravel, and road material will be
eliminated.
The storage of the street sweeper, and the street sweeper
dumpsters will be eliminated.
Upon the successful completion of the exploratory drilling
and testing phase of the project, construction of the permanent oil
drilling and production facilities on the City Maintenance Yard site
will begin. The remaining primary existing site facilities will be
permanently relocated off-site during this phase of the project. These
facilities and functions include:
City vehicle garage and repair facility
Animal control and holding kennel
Butler Building with office space
Maintenance and heavy equipment storage building
Trash and storage bin areas
Fuel tanks, cargo containers, etc.
Stockpiles
For purposes of this assessment, it is assumed that the
maintenance yard operations would be relocated to either the Community
Center site east of the Hermosa Beach City Hall across Valley Drive and
Ardmore Avenue, or the Self -Storage site directly adjacent to the
southern end of City Hall across Bard Street and along Valley Drive.
The Community Center site is bordered by Pacific Coast
Highway on the east, Ardmore Avenue on the west, Pier Avenue on the
north and residential uses to the south. Eleventh Street extends west
into the site from Pacific Coast Highway and provides the primary
access. Commercial uses exist south of Eleventh Street along Pacific
Coast Highway. The Community Center site is currently occupied by the
main community center building, two groups of outdoor tennis courts,
a landscaped park area along the Pacific Coast Highway frontage, and
several parking areas.
It is contemplated by the Public Works Department that should
the City Maintenance Yard be relocated to the Community Center site the
Q
SO.:: . . . . , . , •
fmag
Santa•
C•
cal
886, 896-98.)
fvA-3/1^i/ 1i
make its own CE•
section 15'•
s
a react:.
is infeasible and
e. ( esource I: e
ncv Formation Com. of
unto (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d
a
r. Q=tr ( qA Tonics Of Interest
Subsequent EIR's: Proposed projects often are not
static concepts. On occasion, they are changed
after an EIR or Negative Declaration is prepared
and approved by the Lead Agency. Further
re ire if s ghat
antial
the ro act or substantial
A/•Ptt,•
-� :: •.: which the •ro act is bein•
'l— un rtaken which will require major rev s one of
the EIR. Also, J.f new information becomes
available,- which was not and could not have been
nown a a .e a wa_
complete, further review is required. (PRC
S 21166.) Guidelines sections 15162-15164 discuss
three types of supplemental review documents.
a. Public participation is essential to CEQA
compliance. Changing a project
substantially after an EIR was prepareg
effectively deprives the public 'of any
m assessment of the actual proiect
chosen by the agency.! (Concerned Citizens
of Costa Mesa v. 32nd District Agricultural
Association (1986) 42 Ca1.3d 929, 938
(amphitheatre enlarged and redesigned); City
of San Jose v. Great Oaks Water Co. (1987)
192 Cal.App.3d 1005 (source of water supply
changed for industrial development
project).)
b. If a lawsuit is filed challenging a Lead
Agency's failure to prepare a subsequent EIR,
the standard of review for the court is
whether the administrative record as a whole
contains substantial evidence to support a
determination that the changes in the project
were not so "substantial' as to require
'major' modifications of the EIR. (Bowman v.
City of Petaluma (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 1065,
1075.)
34.
o ', �" L < L-, H C0 �. ► ,..� �1 d r-�� -� la' L� �" \
G .r , LUmo-, 0'5-1 4130
01)
oJ�
-\)AP"
'V
V.42_ t.„.e)5j- -car c4--) --krL csq-e 4 CA ---
S 1 t l S L'1
1 O r 5 I J-sil 6;yZ r -W lZ e a r AS -k --e5
19-e_ 6\ 5-F.1-10-• e -k
w\o\ 1'01( O���I�W
tet'
4.-(2._ 5 ‘1.4) J(z.f•-• c"\ -trz/k4.
( ICdks . he s G�•Ct,c -e•E:i5J-1;
-C„Lc,1-•s 014.
vv\ 4.) 6-Q Z Q. l 0 c40 cl "Nr -(
154)1,0
7CrtLs 0-1a/ �j" S 1 •
n 11
1.. 5 1-2r l
h e l o 1 eiak.1-tet-e c- i,..c
iI.eS /-5¢ N►tiers
1 6-‘.5o\ ��P �� v-I?S
A-14, SS
\ w�` C.,S ti
?J4
o !� lit 1 + c):?-z./i4-1.°N))
fi0
10 -N -.1c)-4)0.1/k-.1xte
�e. Q- rte• ro �C-�d ti
0-11 _. E'�TL 1424_74_ Also 5
0 ss r41 cow, 1-e,J- :o o `rlsk -(
{o, r -c‘ 40 J. -(i � I ,-� _ _�, w,� �-e�s 4-;ADkatst a�
4-)5
U
s
d \ \ / i- ; �► !� G / o v• CA- Ct..) ' ,C \ 1.‘,4---;.aS O N
1 V\c‘ k4r., *A -S2 .\ 6'2-5
t S S� 4,40.
ItS1- ? Ys' i• -)--Q C< -42_d7_1
.sS SP-- 0 C 4'Le_ _es -e
-11 c.L. 1
____ \ a, koti
k_ec,,,D 4/75gL
0-, �- 1 �� S� ,� N /3-J-2_-__92
—tee
1 4-01, f 1 /ILQ,s ,
5 ; ( es- .
rk7 S2 5 a � �'�-�. � S i3-SS-�'SS v►-� Q �1� ... i � � S
v.v\ I +tee tis Nc-e r-
L) --)G r elLCC-4 -E-C_ 4-) -C,(1'Le iryiwt i)C_Q
1( c. -r -c255 Di_\;
vr\c, -R. --Pk- 42. c,k7-2,24)",
( (0)--1 H.ct e'
,, . G ✓OSS ' `? ��-��2.� /4. C ld 1 c\,
G -e ✓ d S r r o0.1
/)-4-4e•c".1) 1-4-74,11/ ?vlbit.C-R,5 k-ts- /5,<
:c..4\4:\c ;
p.d 4, LA.4 4_ A -A -‘-c. 4 -)Le
I ��t-� I tZ9� i`' ► �'�-t nom' l 4- o N
kb q �C Pfoj,Ac lam /o weN
C c,‘ _ Ak" 4-10 _I +L-42. 11";
U o r- Nv 1Zs N nn8 Ji/k cS
1 wkLCk 54A�S ,
'ILK) cf...) (is fi-e Leld, 45.0(c-
•
�•c A--� � ��vr�rM�•• �e �►� � iS (e ,recd t C
rc
c,5 -ed
p/c
4.0 Le_ro.
r S.�
9 1- „LA,
a A-5 C�^-? 1--e2 � V e- Ze vA2 4.-t)) /
J •
Li
d— -1--,,
•
c_o v-25 I 3_1 A-- 1 I
o't\ -RA?ci
-R \LE Ad
-\-- /--e_ c c>\ \• 12-,-e-41"" 10\--t
:11_)
co\
_ _ _ S
S _441
'<• 1/4 / t-,L-)C)"'Q
Gy,-\ (I\cLOAC e. -1-5-7)An ;k4c-,1
(1-1,1Nco,_,5 Ck cila CA' 5 1•-)
-e
+k! 0 -E
e/J
C— 18\g -S ckJ J -&-e N -/c -4Q J --es (3
12_k ro--1 )0.J.?ec
ocy)---e a2P 41,c_ --zo?'14 ci)]
TO:
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
Honorable
Council
Ay,e
Mayor and Members of the City
FROM: Michael Schubach, Plaiinin g!pire for
SUBJECT: City Council / Planning Commission Workshop
Meeting
DATE: November 3, 1992
At their meeting of October 20, 1992, the Planning Commission
suggested Thursday, December 3, 1992, at 7:30 p.m. to be the City
Council / Planning Commission workshop date, and the suggested
topics are Land Use Element update and RUDAT plan.
Please confirm the date and add your own topics if necessary.
NOTED
Frederick R. Ferrin
City Manager
p/memo9
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of,the City Council
.-\. /`
FROM: Michael Schubach - Plfnii Dir. ecor
f�c
SUBJECT: Additional Subject for Joint Meeting
DATE: November 10, 1992
Since the Strand walk and wall project may be "on-line" in the_
nearfuture, it may be appropriate to have_ a status report
concerning this matter at the joint meeting.
p/memoa
SUr PLEMENTAI
INFORMATION
KELLING_NORTHCROSS & NOBRIGA, INC.
BoriiiManagdnient Services for Public Agencies
595 Market Scrccr
Suite 135,.
San Frandsen. CA 94105
415.362 411C
FAX 415-957.261C
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gary Brutsch, Treasurer. City of Hermosa Reach
FROM: Mark Northcross, KNN
DATE: November 10, 1992
SUBJECT: Refunding the City's COP's.
7(tro-i'v
The City can refund its existing COP's. By doing so, it can eliminate the covenant
in the current legal documents that prohibits any reduction in the utility user's tax until the
COP's are paid off. However, to do so would increase debt service over the current debt
service. The reason for this is that the COP's are not callable until 1997. This means that
the proceeds of the refunding bonds would have to be escrowed until 1997, using direct
Federal securities. Since the yield on the escrow would be under 6%, while the interest rate
on the City's COP's is over 7%, extra money would have to be put into the escrow to make
up this adverse difference in interest rates (called negative arbitrage). In addition to this
problem, the original final term of the COP's is 2001. This means that the City would have
to fund negative arbitrage on the escrow for over four years (through 1997) but only have
four years after that of "free and clear" savings. The City must also pay a 2% call premium,
plus the expenses of the refunding issue. While interest have dropped substantially since
the COP's were issued, they have not dropped enough such that the savings pay for these
costs. The net result is that the City would lose money on the refunding. Unless there is
an overriding reason to lower the utility user's tax now, I recommend against refunding this
COP issue now.
[3 MN\hl C:\closed\000n1o.memj
SUPPLEMfNTNt
INFORMATION
luc
•Charter vlernher. National Association of Independent. Public Ph;uncc Afitis;;rs•
5776 SZOnun.IRC Man PnaJ :uiio 3BC PI,uaancon• CA 9438H 51c.73,,c 35 v1J; 1O', 5+0757