Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/15/92w_ii-74-/r.A_.)-1*2.— 553_51c( /7 "There is always hope when people are forced to listen to both sides." -John Stuart Mill AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, December 15, 1992 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 7:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR Robert Essertier MAYOR PRO TEM Albert Wiemans COUNCILMEMBERS Robert Benz Sam Y. Edgerton Kathleen Midstokke CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Frederick R. Ferrin CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart- ment, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting a packet also is available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PRESENTATION OF SERVICE AWARD PLAQUE TO HERMOSA BEACH POLICE COMMANDER ANTHONY ALTFELD. PRESENTATION OF 40 YEAR SERVICE PIN AND PROCLAMATION TO PUBLIC WORKS CREWLEADER LES RANDALL. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public •Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". - 1 - Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or oral- ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet com- pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be- gin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. *The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote: Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni- ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or- dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi- nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. w. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on November 24, 1992. (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive, and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the November, 1992 investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated (e) (f) (g) (h) Recommendation to approve installation of a Marked Un- controlled crosswalk across the north leg of Manhattan Avenue at 29th Street for a one year test study to determine its effectiveness. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated November 5, 1992. Recommendation to approve the request from CE Sports and Entertainment to conduct a 4 -Man Professional Volleyball Tournament May 22 and 23, 1993. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 7, 1992. Recommendation to authorize the City Manager to execute a supplemental to the 1991-1993 Teamster Union, Local 911, Memoranda of Understanding, General, Supervisory, and Administrative bargaining units formalizing main- taining the existing salary range for the period Septem- ber 1, 1992 through August 31, 1993. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 2, 1992. Recommendation to approve request from the Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce and Mark Conte Productions to allow them to utilize Hermosa Avenue from 8th Street to Heron - do for approximately 20 minutes on January 31st, 1993 for the start of the 2nd Annual Super Bowl Mile. Memo- randum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 7, 1992. (i) Recommendation to approve Hermosa Beach to act as host city for the 1993 International Surf Festival and to - 2 - .,..ctb. , I- t )/ ) (k) (1) (m) host the 1993 National Lifeguard Championships on August 6 and 7. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 7, 1992. Recommendation to approve (lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Project Touch or rental of Room C at the Community Center. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 7, 1992. Recommendation to receive and file the Cable Television franchise renewal timeline and to adopt the procedures as listed in the analysis. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 2, 1992. Recommendation to approve Cable Television Franchise Renewal Expense Reimbursement Agreement. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated De- cember 2, 1992. Recommendation to authorize donation of ten unclaimed bicycles in the possession of the Police Department. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated December 9, 1992. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. / (a) Recommendation to adopt resolution)approving a Memoran- dum of Understandi?Tg between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association, Of- ficers' and Sergeants' Bargaining Unit. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 2, 1992. Recommendation to Cdopt resolution approving a Memoran- dum of Understanding between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Hermosa Beach Police Officers' Association, Commanders Bargaining Unit. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 2, 1992. ORDINANCE NO. 92-1079/`. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING RDINANCE TEXT REGARDING STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR ON -SALE AND OFF -SALE ALCOHOL ESTABLISHMENTS AND TO CHANGE THE MANDATED CONDITIONS FOR OTHER CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES TO RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS AND TO ADOPT AN ENVIRON- MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. - 3 - (a) (d) Letter from Roger Bacon dated December 2, 1992 regarding the closure of the Security Pacific Bank located at 1100-5 Pacific Coast Highway. Letter from Howard Longacre dated December 9, 1992 regarding meeting replays by MultiVision. Letter from Debra Barker dated December 9, 1992 request- ing City Council to reconsider their decision and leave the existing space for public parking. Letter from Ken Marks, Chairman of the Hermosa Beach Veterans Memorial Committee requesting the City to fly the POW/MIA flag on the City's flagpoles. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. V 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENT OR PROHIBIT SECOND UNITS PER STATE CODE SECTION 65852.2. (Continued from November 10, 1992 meeting.) Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated December 7, 1992. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. 1991-92 ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND AUDIT REPORTS: A. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) 1991- 92, INCLUDING REPORT FROM INDEPENDENT AUDITOR. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dat- ed December 2, 1992. B. AUDITOR REVIEW OF INTERNAL CONTROLS AND APPROPRIA- TION LIMIT. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 9, 1992. 7. PROPOSED RESTRIPING OF PUBLIC PARKING TO CREATE ADDI- TIONAL PARKING TO COMPENSATE FOR RALPH'S PROPOSED REMOD- EL AND ADDITION AT PARK PACIFIC SHOPPING CENTER PARKING LOT, ADJACENT TO GREENWOOD PARK. Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated December 8, 1992. iv 8. (AGREEMENT WITH ROGER BACON FOR ACCESS MODIFICATIONS AT ARK PAC FIC SHOPPING CENTER, LOCATED AT 1100 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated December 7, 1992. 9. VEHICLE PARKING ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG BEACH DRIVE. (Continued from September 8, 1992 meeting.) Re- port from Councilmembers Edgerton and Wiemans. 10. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH. Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Charles McDonald dated December 3, 1992. 1 11. DOWNTOWN MAINTENANCE( CONTRACTS Memorandum from City Manager Rick Ferrin ated Dec ber 9, 1992. A. DOWNTOWN MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS - GENERAL. Memoran- dum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated November 16, 1992. B. AWARD OF BID FOR MUNICIPAL PIER MAINTENANCE CON- TRACT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated October 26, 1992. C. AWARD OF BID FOR CLEANING OF DOWNTOWN SIDEWALKS CONTRACT. Memorandum from Public Works Director / Charles McDonald dated v D. AWARD OF BID FOR DOWNTOWN AREA MAINTENANCE CON- TRACT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Suggested dates from VPD Board of Parking Place Commis- sion for joint meeting with City Council. Memorandum from Board of Parking Place Commission Staff Liaison Henry L. Staten dated December 3, 1992. 14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (a) Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of reduc- tion of parking tickets to $10 in the commercial zones. (b) Request by Councilmember Edgerton to direct the Planning Department to amend CUP process so that businesses re- quired to have a CUP have sufficient time to review pro- posed conditions before any public hearing. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT • p E D : a • 1E- clz MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, December 15, 1992, at the hour of 7:55 P.M. *********** start page = ???? ********** CLOSED SESSION - the closed session was held at 7: P.M. regard- ing matters of Personnel: meet and confer. The closed session was recessed at P.M. to the regular scheduled public meet- ing. ******************* PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Essertier Absent: None PRESENTATION OF SERVICE AWARD PLAQUE TO HERMOSA BEACH POLICE COMMANDER ANTHONY ALTFELD - Mayor Essertier ********** 0 ,41 i\\Ye PRESENTATION OF 40 YEAR SERVICE PIN AND PROCLAMATION TO PUBLIC WORKS CREWLEADER LES RANDALL - Mayor Essertier ********** fq s ,61/0 0 /__s /Ai )6C0/( ANNO - Mayor ier announced *********** PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 1 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: VHoward Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, `'p 7/ `� ��� Wil a Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, v 1 G f;-://) Y-( ii � �9 I/ June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, Edie Webber - 1210 Eleventh Street, Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, Martin Moreno - 1326 Corona Street, Marc Freeman - 1937 Palm Drive, ,Q,f"o,"kr()I-pfr ./( Vii✓ - // /(-; City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 2 • 1. L CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (m), with the exception of the following item which was removed for discussion in item 3, but is shown in order for clarity: (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) , (e) , (f) , (g) , (h) , (i) (j) , (k) , (1) , and (m) .. Motion , second s"�. So ordered. Coming forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar were: 1 No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on November 24, 1992. (b) Action: To approve the minutes of the regular meeting of November 24, 1992, as Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. 42609 through 42803 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 42610, 42611, 42620, 42634, 42671, 42672, 42673, 42698, 42736, 42737, 42755, and 42764; and, to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 3 (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. Recommendation to receive and file the November, 1992 investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated Action: To receive and file the November, 1992, invest- ment report as presented. (e) Recommendation to approve installation of a Marked Un- controlled crosswalk across the north leg of Manhattan Avenue at 29th Street for a one year test study to determine its effectiveness. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated November 5, 1992. /je Proposed Action: To approve the staff recommendation as presented. Motion , second So ordeed, noting the objec ed tions of ('' Proposed Action: To receive and file. Motion , second . So ordered, noting the objec- tions of /\/' g (f) Recommendation to approve the request from CE Sports and Entertainment to conduct a 4 -Man Professional Volleyballs Tournament May 22 and 23, 1993. Memorandum from Com- ,, munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 7, 1992. Q /,/ 4 l r".'0/ _ City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 4 7/7"-A-4/ /6--8-7,--c-y i?"---( D'' • sof/ ✓1 1 Action: To a rode the staff recommendati-ash to approve PP PP the request by CE Sports and Entertainment to conduct a Professional Volleyball Tournament May 22 and 23, for an estimated revenue of $6,786.25 for fees and costs 4 -man 1993, other -j (g) Recommendation to authorize the City Manager to execute a supplemental to the 1991-1993 Teamster Union, Local 911, Memoranda of Understanding, General, Supervisory, �r a /i and Administrative bargaining units formalizing main - taining the existing salary range ber 1, 1992 through August 31, Personnel Di Robert 1992. o ,_) /4 9 (h) 400.1 �^ rd,,p V L G (i) rector for the period Septem- 1993. Memorandum from Blackw••• _ated December 2, ovA Recommendation o approve request from the Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce and Mark Conte Productions to allow them to utilize Hermosa Avenue from 8th Street to Heron - do for approximately 20 minutes on January 31st, 1993 for the start of the 2nd Annual Super Bowl Mile. Memo randum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 7, 1992. Action: To approve t ommendation a resent d "/(4' cf- Recommendation to approve Hermosa :each to act as host city for the 1993 International Surf Festival and to City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 5 • host the 1993 National Lifeguard Championships on August 6 and 7. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 7, 1992. (i) Action: To approve presented. -12 the staff recommendation as Recommendation to approve lease-agreementbetween the City of Hermosa Beach and roject-Touch-"for rental of Room C at the Community Center. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 7, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the one year lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Project Touch for rental of Room C at the Com- munity Center at a cost of $262 per month (312 sq.ft. X $.84) for an annual total of $3,222. Recommendation to receive and file the Cable Television franchise renewal timeline and to adopt the procedures as listed in the analysis. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 2, 1992. 1c Action: To approve the Cable Television Advisory Board and staff recommendations to approve the timeline and procedures for the franchise renewal process which has the Board work as sub -committees for informational input i) and shows a public hearing before the Board in April and before the Council in May of 1993. (1) 7r/ Recommendation to approve Cable Television Franchise Renewal Expense Reimbursement Agreement. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated De- cember 2, 1992. City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 6 10( d (m) Acti `-ttOvr---"*"? le; t•-• 412 To approve the recommendation Television Advisory Board and staff to City Manager to sign an agreement with will provide up to $12,000 to the City renewal expenses. 1) of the Cable authorize the MultiVision that for Franchise Recommendation to authorize donat on o ten unc bicycles in the possession of the Police Department. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated December 9, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to donate ten unclaimed bicycles, which have been repaired and reconditioned by donations of labor and parts by "Beach Cities Cycles", to children of needy families as Christ- mas presents from the City of Hermosa Beach. /15/// ) --2'7/ ( f - Y2 W 1' )o 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. Recommendation to (adopt resolution a•• •ving a Temoran- dum of Understanding between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association, Of- ficers' and Sergeants' Bargaining Unit. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 2, 1992. (a) Action: To adopt Resolution"No: 92=55 i?; entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY-COUNCII; OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTAND- ING WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION OFFICERS AND SERGEANTS BARGAINING UNIT." Motion 1f, , second, . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 7 (b) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving a Memoran- dum of Understanding between the ity of Hermosa Beach and the Hermosa Beach Police Officers' Association, Commanders Bargaining Unit. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 2, 1992. Action: To adopt4Resolution No. 92-55$(0; entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTAND- ING WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION COMMANDERS' BARGAINING UNIT." Motion AV , second4 , . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes,i/eAL23! v 2 << I (c) (ORDINANCE NO. 92-1079 - AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT REGAR ING STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR ON -SALE AND OFF -SALE ALCOHOL ESTABLISHMENTS AND TO CHANGE THE MANDATED CONDITIONS FOR OTHER CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES TO RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS AND TO ADOPT AN ENVIRON- MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Tdr—adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 92-1079. Motion,g07 , second 1 . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1 4:':,_,vr<�i!=•� (e), (f) , ifilEXMAP (1) , (k), (1) r-- = 1were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. 3 10, 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Roger Bacon dated December 2, 1992 regarding the closure of the Security Pacific Bank located at 1100-5 Pacific Coast Highway. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 8 • Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Roger Bombast - Park Pacific Shopping Center owner, e --�oc - W•6 Action: To direct staff to prepare a letter supporting the continued operation of the Security Pacific/Bank of America branch at 1100-5 Pacific Coast Highway in the Park Pacific Shopping Center. Motion , second The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of (b) Letter from Howard Longacre dated December 9, 1992 regarding meeting replays by MultiVision. (c) Letter from Debra Barker dated December 9, 1992 request- ing City Council to reconsider their decision and leave the existing space for public parking. 250-/77f74'472L y s am` City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 9 (d) Letter from Ken Marks, Chairman of the Hermosa Beach Veterans Memorial Committee requesting the City to fly the POW/MIA flag on the City's flagpoles. �--� (("6 PVT-17M)))--�- ��`" /- — 'tom a, s, ?,o d / 42 / v l� Q %%,� U `..� /� 4-19 y u PUBLIC ARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENT OR PROHIBIT SECOND UNITS PER STATE CODE SECTION 65852.2. (Continued from November 10, 1992 meeting.) Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated December 7, 1992. Supplemental memorandum from Planning Director Schubach dated December 14, 1992. e --0L Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. o The public hearing opened at J?:. P.M., coming dress the Council were: forward to ad - The public hearing closed at ,e7 Pc 2:3D P.M. --7(C/5) e " City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 10 7 Proposed Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 92-1014 Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Proposed Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 92-10$g1, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE CREATION OF SECOND UNITS PURSUANT TO SECTION 654852.2(a) OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRON- MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion , second AYES: NOES: Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 92-1080. Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of a Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 92-10$4 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,.CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PRO- HIBIT THE CREATION OF SECOND UNITS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 65852.2(c) OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion , second AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, and Mayor Essertier NOES: None MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. 1991-92 ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND AUDIT REPORTS: A. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL 92, INCLUDING REPORT FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) 1991 - FROM INDEPENDENT AUDITOR. City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 11 Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dat- ed December 2, 1992. Finance Director Copeland presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. /t--�^ - Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive l'and file the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report $ d✓ (CAFR) 1991-92, which includes the report from the l/ UU / City's independent auditor, Coopers and Lybrand, giving J . he City an unqualified opinion (indicating the auditor believes the financial statements present a fairP icture of the financial position of the City.) Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of / 4/ 3 B. AUDITOR REVIEW OF INTERNAL CONTROLS AND APPROPRIA- TION LIMIT. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 9, 1992. Finance Director Copeland presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file: 1) the review of the 1991-92 Appropriation Limitation submitted by the City's auditor, Coopers and Lybrand, which stated that as far as their pro- cedures provide, appropriate procedures were fol- lowed in determining and adopting the limit, and 2) the review of internal controls submitted by the City's auditor, Coopers and Lybrand, which stated that upgrade of the City's financial software would be of great benefit. J)1 fi 7. PROPOSED RESTRIPING OF PUBLIC PARKING TO CREATE ADDI- TIONAL PARKING TO COMPENSATE FOR RALPH'S PROPOSED REMOD- EL AND ADDITION AT PARK PACIFIC SHOPPING CENTER PARKING City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 12 • LOT, ADJACENT TO GREENWOOD PARK. Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated December 8, 1992. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Roger Bacon - Park Pacific Center owner, Proposed Action: To Action: To: allow Park Pacific Center to restripe and reconfigure the City's public parking adjacent to Green- wood park to compact size for the needed four extra spaces; or to: keep 1/3 of the City's public parking adjacent to Greenwood Park as standard size, the rest converted to compact size, with the additional space provided else- where on the private parking lot; or 1) obtain Planning Commission approval for a Parking Plan Amendment for the small addition to Ralph's, and reducing or eliminating the need for compact stalls; or 2) allow park users with standard size vehicles to park in the private portion of the parking lot (an agreement to post signs to this effect would have to be entered into with Mr. Bacon); or 3) redistribute the proposed compact parking through- out the lot, eliminating the need for compact park- ing in the public portion. 8. (AGREEMENT WITH ROGER BACON FOR ACCESS MODIFICATIONS AT PARRPAC IC SHOPPING CENTER, LOCATED AT 1100 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald d_ -• •- -Ho" 7 1992. 7 '�� _ow_ � %L'viti+%.r-fit_ �L ii..._,..„...,,,,,ing:,,,„,,*1;.,:4,,,a,--Itii:------ ---- „,...„ - _-_- ,,,,_.....„...,-..:,..._ .....„-____,.„..... ....„ .............„.._.„..„...„ City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 13 • d,9 rks Director MacDo Coming forward to address the Council on this item were/ Roger Bacon - Park Pacific Center owner, 7 l 575 _.5// ar- C-4 , e/9 ( ) 7:// ' ,„..!/17' _ = ice' - Proposed Action: To approve the staff recommendation to direct the Public Works staff to proceed with plans to design and construct the access modifications at Park f' Pacific Shopping Center as a City contract, with the — understanding that the project would take a minimum of eight months to completion. / Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the �o dissenting votes of � / 2 Action: To require that Mr. Bacon execute the contract (on a take -it -or -leave -it -basis), including the indemni- fication clause in Article 10.1, on the following grounds: a) ***********(fill in if this is selected)******* b) c) d) Motion , second The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 14 • (Thi Z ,o. ---- ( v r'') 19 ' VEHICLE PARKING ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG BEACH DRIVE. (Continued from September 8, 1992 meeting.) Re- port from Councilmembers Edgerton and Wiemans. )-d(- ecq3z41.s-- ) 5,-/&< ) I er -')A-7/ ‘-`7, /57 _ Ee4 47 41/w )///-j•-.1 10. OMMENDATION TO APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH. Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Charles McDonald dated December 3, 1992. Public Works Director MacDonald presented the staff re- port and responded to Council questions forward to address the council on this item were /1"..__ /-)7 /t--0•-) C7/97 d9 fit qi/ 4V1Y ar" City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 15 Proposed Action: To Action: To approve the plans and specifications for the Stand Bikeway and Pedestrian Path, CIP 90-144 at a total cost of $1,305,585; authorize staff to call for bids; and, to issue addenda as necessary 11. DOWNTOWN MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS. Memorandum from City Manager Rick Ferrin dated December 9, 1992. City Manager Ferrin presented his report regarding the lack of response to the bid proposals for the downtown maintenance and the possibility of readvertising a fourth time as: 1) the prevailing wage language could be eliminated; 2) there could be three more bidders; 3) it was possible, but not likely, that the City would receive a better bid; and, 4) it would cost the City $1,477.85 to readvertise the bid, plus an additional two to three months without a contract. A. DOWNTOWN MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS - GENERAL. Memoran- dum from Public Work Directo Charles McDonald dated November 16, 1992. 711/ _,/ 2, ,„,, C ,., a 0/, City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 16 B. AWARD OF BID FOR • MUNICIPAL PIER MAINTENANCE ON - *TRACT.. Memorandum from Public Works -Director Charles McDonald dated October 26, 1992. ft/A) -4,2, zi 1 � V. '46 AWARD OF BID FOR CLEANING OF -DOWNTOWN -SIDEWALKS :CONTRAC-T Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated (3-c+, 2�b //. /3/ = Nb AWARD OF BID FOR DOWNTOWN_AREA.MAINTENANCE-CON-, .TRACT Memorandum from Public Works Director - Charles McDonald dated rID (a) MISCELLANEOUS rif ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager � } Ferrin �//4 reported /4 67, rre• dYr MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL ite-Afi) Suggested dates from VPD Board of Parking Place Commis- sion for joint meeting with City Council. Memorandum from Board of Parking Place Commission Staff Liaison Henry L. Staten dated December 3, 1992. rrovti, City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 17 Action: To approve the date of (Wed. 1-6; or Thur. 1-7; or Wed. 1-13; or ) at the hour of for the joint meeting of the City Council and the Board of Parking Place Commissioners. Motion , second . So ordered. 14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (a) Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of reduc- tion of parking tickets to $10 in the commercial zones. 1() (b) / - Request by Councilmember Edgerton to direct the Planning Department to amend CUP process so that businesses re- quired to have a CUP have sufficient time to review pro- posed conditions before any public hearing. e- -2} 9";r="?... -0') z r� City Council Minutes 12 .--x(>// (fiyi 471 92 Page 18 CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: oward Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, < ' Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., K Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., A/'Y' Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, Edie Webber - 1210 Eleventh Street, Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, Martin Moreno - 1326 Corona Street, Marc Freeman - 1937 Palm Drive, ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, December 13, 1993, at the hour of A.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, January 26, 1993, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Deputy CityClerk P Y - -30 City Council Minutes 12-15-92 Page 19 ACTION SHEET ACTION SHEET ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, December 15, 1992 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 7:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. CONVENED AT 7:55 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY TONY ALTFELD ROLL CALL: ALL PRESENT PRESENTATION OF SERVICE AWARD PLAQUE TO HERMOSA BEACH POLICE COMMANDER ANTHONY ALTFELD. PRESENTATION OF 40 YEAR SERVICE PIN AND PROCLAMATION TO PUBLIC WORKS CREWLEADER LES RANDALL. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION HOWARD LONGACRE 1221 7TH PLACE - OBJECTED TO THE HOTEL APPROVAL, FEELS IT GOES BEYOND MINISTERIAL DUTY, AND THAT REFERENDUM SHOULD BE ACCEPTED. ALSO WANTS TO TALK ON ITEMS 1F, 1K, AND 1L. JOHN MCHUGH - THANKED THE PEOPLE WHO SIGNED HIS PETITION AGAINST THE HOTEL. THEN HE, JANET MCHUGH AND PARKER HERRIOTT READ FROM A LETTER THEY SUBMITTED CITING STATE CODE THEY FEEL COVERS ALLOWING THEIR REFERENDUM PETITION TO BE ACCEPTED BY CITY. SHIRLEY CASSELL - AGAIN COMPLAINED ABOUT REGULAR MEETING STARTING 25 MINUTES LATE. MAYOR ESSERTIER SAID STARTING NEXT MEETING CLOSED SESSION WILL BE AT END OF MEETING. CHARLES EVANS, 321 MANHATTAN AVE. - REPORTED THAT RECEIVING WARN- ING NOTICES ON SIDEWALK PARKING INDICATING ENFORCEMENT IS TO BE- GIN IN JANUARY. HE WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT NOT TO BE EN- FORCED IN FORSEEABLE FUTURE. FEELS THERE IS A LACK OF COMMUNICA- TION UPFRONT WITH THE RESIDENTS, SEEMS TO BE NO GOOD METHOD TO DISSEMINATE INFORMATION TO AFFECTED RESIDENTS WHEN ISSUES COME UP, NO EFFORT TO BRING RESIDENTS IN AS PARTNERS ON ISSUES, NOT CLEAR THAT PUBLIC HEARING INPUT IS INCORPORATED INTO YOUR DECI- SIONS, AND NO IDENTIFICATION OF WHY YOU DO WHAT YOU DO. THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION GIVEN TO THE PUBLIC. MAYOR ASKED THAT MR. EVANS LEAVE HIS TELEPHONE NUMBER WITH C.M. SO HE COULD CONTACT HIM. ROBERT OTTINGER, 1ST PLACE - WANTS TO KNOW IF COUNCIL IS GOING TO ACCEPT THE REFERENDUM ON THE HOTEL. C.A. RESPONDED THAT CITY COUNCIL CANNOT ACCEPT IT. THE REFEREN- DUM PETITION WAS IMPROPER SUBJECT MATTER FOR REFERENDUM. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on November 24, 1992. (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive, and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the November, 1992 investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated December 7, 1992. (e) Recommendation to approve installation of a Marked Un- controlled crosswalk across the north leg of Manhattan Avenue at 29th Street for a one year test study to determine its effectiveness. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated November 5, 1992. PULLED BY KM - MOTION KM/SE- TO RECEIVE AND FILE. FAILS (RB/RE/AW-NO MOTION RE/AW- TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. (KM WANTS RECORD TO REFLECT SHE IS STRONGLY AGAINST, AND SINCE ENGINEER RECOMMENDS AGAINST, COUNCILMEMBERS ARE INCREASING THEIR LIABILITY EXPOSURE.) OK 3-2 (KM/SE-NO) (f) Recommendation to approve the request from CE Sports and Entertainment to conduct a 4 -Man Professional Volleyball Tournament May 22 and 23, 1993. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 7, 1992. PULLED BY KM - KM OBJECTS TO TOURNAMENT BEING HELD ONE WEEK BEFORE THE FIESTA. GARRY FROST IN FAVOR OF APPROVING. HOWARD LONGACRE AGAINST. SHIRLEY CASSELL - AGAINST. DALLAS YOST - IN FAVOR. ROB YEHOUDAS - IN FAVOR. MOTION SE/RB TO APPROVE STAFF REC. IN THE FUTURE, SHOULD NEGO- TIATE FOR MORE MONEY. OK 3-2 (KM/AW-NO) (g) Recommendation to authorize the City Manager to execute a supplemental to the 1991-1993 Teamster Union, Local 911, Memoranda of Understanding, General, Supervisory, and Administrative bargaining units formalizing main- taining the existing salary range for the period Septem- ber 1, 1992 through August 31, 1993. Memorandum from (h) (i) Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 2, 1992. Recommendation to approve request from the Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce and Mark Conte Productions to allow them to utilize Hermosa Avenue from 8th Street to Heron - do for approximately 20 minutes on January 31st, 1993 for the start of the 2nd Annual Super Bowl Mile. Memo- randum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 7, 1992. Recommendation to approve Hermosa Beach to act as host city for the 1993 International Surf Festival and to host the 1993 National Lifeguard Championships on August 6 and 7. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 7, 1992. PULLED BY SE - MOTION SE/RE- TO APPROVE. SO ORDERED. (MARY ROONEY NOTED THAT DATES SHOULD READ AUGUST 5, 6 AND 7.) (i) (k) Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Project Touch for rental of Room C at the Community Center. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 7, 1992. Recommendation to receive and file the Cable Television franchise renewal timeline and to adopt the procedures as listed in the analysis. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 2, 1992. PULLED BY KM - TAKE ITEMS 1K AND 1L TOGETHER. (1) Recommendation to approve Cable Television Franchise Renewal Expense Reimbursement Agreement. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated De- cember 2, 1992. CLERK NOTED SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION OF AMENDED DRAFT LETTER TO MULTIVISION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY. PULLED BY KM - TAKEN WITH ITEM K ABOVE MOTION SE/RB TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON K AND L. FAILS KM/RE/AW-NO. MOTION KM/RE- TO HAVE STAFF RENEGOTIATE THE EXPENSES (WOULD LIKE TO SEE A $20,000 AND A $10,000 DEPOSIT.) OK 3-2 (RE/AW-NO). (m) Recommendation to authorize donation of ten unclaimed bicycles in the possession of the Police Department. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated December 9, 1992. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. (a) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving a Memoran- dum of Understanding between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association, Of- ficers' and Sergeants' Bargaining Unit. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 2, 1992. MOTION KM/RB TO ADOPT RESO. 92-5585. SO ORDERED. (b) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving a Memoran- dum of Understanding between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Hermosa Beach Police Officers' Association, Commanders Bargaining Unit. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 2, 1992. MOTION KM/RB TO ADOPT RESO. 92-5586 SO ORDERED. (KM MADE COM- MENTS ABOUT RESTRUCTURING MOU. (c) ORDINANCE NO. 92-1079 - AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT REGARDING STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR ON -SALE AND OFF -SALE ALCOHOL ESTABLISHMENTS AND TO CHANGE THE MANDATED CONDITIONS FOR OTHER CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES TO RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS AND TO ADOPT AN ENVIRON- MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. MOTION RB/SE- TO ADOPT ORDINANCE. OK 3-2 (KM/AW-NO). 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Roger Bacon dated December 2, 1992 regarding the closure of the Security Pacific Bank located at 1100-5 Pacific Coast Highway. MOTION RE/RB TO WRITE A LETTER SUPPORTING KEEPING BANK OPEN. SO ORDERED. (b) Letter from Howard Longacre dated December 9, 1992 regarding meeting replays by MultiVision. MAYOR CONFIRMED THIS IS COUNCIL'S POLICY. (c) Letter from Debra Barker dated December 9, 1992 request- ing City Council to reconsider their decision and leave the existing space for public parking. MOTION SE/RB TO REPLACE THE PARKING SPACE. OK 3-2 (KM/RE-NO). (d) Letter from Ken Marks, Chairman of the Hermosa Beach Veterans Memorial Committee requesting the City to fly the POW/MIA flag on the City's flagpoles. MOTION KM/RB TO APPROVE FLYING THE FLAG OVER CITY HALL AND INVITE MR. MARKS AND HIS FRIENDS TO ATTEND . OK 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENT OR PROHIBIT SECOND UNITS PER STATE CODE SECTION 65852.2. (Continued from November 10, 1992 meeting.) Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated December 7, 1992. MOTION SE/RE- TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. 92-1080 WITH CHANGE NOT- ED ON ORDINANCE PROHIBITING 2ND UNITS (PAGE 11, LINES 7 AND 8) TO STATE "AT THAT TIME, ORDINANCE NO. 92-1081 WILL BE IMPLE- MENTED,...". AND TO ADD THE SUMMARY CLAUSE. OK 3-2 (RB/AW-NO) MOTION RE/KM- TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. 92-1081. OK 3-2 (RB/AW- NO) . MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. 1991-92 ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND AUDIT REPORTS: A. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) 1991- 92, INCLUDING REPORT FROM INDEPENDENT AUDITOR. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dat- ed December 2, 1992. MOTION SE/RE- TO RECEIVE AND FILE. SO ORDERED. B. AUDITOR REVIEW OF INTERNAL CONTROLS AND APPROPRIA- TION LIMIT. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 9, 1992. MOTION RE/SE STAFF REC. SO ORDERED. 7. PROPOSED RESTRIPING OF PUBLIC PARKING TO CREATE ADDI- TIONAL PARKING TO COMPENSATE FOR RALPH'S PROPOSED REMOD- EL AND ADDITION AT PARK PACIFIC SHOPPING CENTER PARKING LOT, ADJACENT TO GREENWOOD PARK. Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated December 8, 1992. MOTION RE/SE- TO APPROVE PARKING PLAN AS SUGGESTED BY BACON. SO ORDERED. 8. AGREEMENT WITH ROGER BACON FOR ACCESS MODIFICATIONS AT PARK PACIFIC SHOPPING CENTER, LOCATED AT 1100 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated December 7, 1992. FOLLOWING C.A. DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS, BACON SAID WOULD LIKE TO LEAVE IT OPEN AND MEET AND WTTH CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY AND TRY TO COME UP WITH ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE. 5 MOTION RE/KM- TO RECEIVE AND FILE. SO ORDERED. 9. VEHICLE PARKING ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG BEACH DRIVE. (Continued from September 8, 1992 meeting.) Re- port from Councilmembers Edgerton and Wiemans. SUBCOMMITTEE REC. IS BASICALLY TO HAVE AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PROCESS. STAFF COME UP WITH WORDING FOR PERMIT AND HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND SEE WHAT THE CITIZENS THINK. MOTION RE - TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND RESTRICT THE PROBLEM TO THE STRAND PROPERTIES FOR NOW. SECOND SE. MOTION RB/AW - HAVE AW AND SE AS SUBCOMMITTEE FOR SECOND PHASE - EAST SIDE OF BEACH DRIVE AND WALK STREETS. OK 4-1 (RE -NO) 10. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH. Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Charles McDonald dated December 3, 1992. MOTION SE TO APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND GO WITH A HALF ROUND. SECOND RE. OK 4-1 (AW -NO) KM/RB TO INCLUDE THE OTHER FOUR ADDITIONAL FEATURES SHOWN ON LAST PAGE OF STAFF REPORT. SO ORDERED. 11. DOWNTOWN MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS. Memorandum from City Manager Rick Ferrin dated December 9, 1992. A. DOWNTOWN MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS - GENERAL. Memoran- dum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated November 16, 1992. MOTION KM/RE- TO RECEIVE & FILE. NO OBJECTION MOTION RB/ TO SEND OUT TO BID AND HAVE OUR OWN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BID ON IT AS WELL. B. AWARD OF BID FOR MUNICIPAL PIER MAINTENANCE CON- TRACT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated October 26, 1992. MOTION KM/AW TO AWARD TO SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE. FAILS 2-3 (RE/ RB/SE-NO) MOTION RE/ SEND OUT TO BID AND SEE ABOUT BRINGING IT HOUSE. IN THE MEANTIME DO IN HOUSE. 2-3 (KM/RE/SE-NO) MOTION RB GO OUT TO BID WITH MAINTENANCE BEING CONTINUED ON MONTH TO MONTH BASIS. SECOND RE. OK 3-2 (KM/RE-NO) C. AWARD OF BID FOR CLEANING OF DOWNTOWN SIDEWALKS CONTRACT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated MOTION RE SEND TO BID AND NOT CLEAN IN MEANTIME. SECOND RB. FAILS (KM/AW/SE-NO). MOTION SE/RE TO PUT OUT TO BID. (KM -NO) D. AWARD OF BID FOR DOWNTOWN AREA MAINTENANCE CON- TRACT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated MOTION SE/AW- SEND OUT TO REBID AND HAVE CURRENT CONTRACTOR CON- TINUE MEANTIME. OK KM/RE-NO. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCED THAT AS OF JANUARY 11 ALL PERMITS, TICKETS ETC. WILL BE HANDLED IN ROOM 101. HEARING OFFICER WILL COME ON WEDNESDAY DEC. 23 RATHER THAN DEC. 24. 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Suggested dates from VPD Board of Parking Place Commis- sion for joint meeting with City Council. Memorandum from Board of Parking Place Commission Staff Liaison Henry L. Staten dated December 3, 1992. SET JOINT MEETING FOR JANUARY 14 AT 7:00 A.M. 14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (a) Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of reduc- tion of parking tickets to $10 in the commercial zones. ROLL IT, PER RB. (b) Request by Councilmember Edgerton to direct the Planning Department to amend CUP process so that businesses re- quired to have a CUP have sufficient time to review pro- posed conditions before any public hearing. DIRECT C.M. TO COORDINATE WITH EXEC.DIR. OF CHAMBER. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. HOWARD LONGACRE - RE. RUDAT REPORT SECTION ON BIKE WAYS - QUES- TIONED WHERE DEEDS TO BEACH ARE TO CONFIRM CITY OWNERSHIP OF BEACH. ALSO WANTS ALL INFORMATION ON BEACH RESURRECTED AND COMPILED. CELESTE COURT - COMPLAINED ABOUT NUMBER CONFUSION ON CERTAIN STREETS, ESPECIALLY HER SECTION OF LOMA DRIVE. ADJOURNMENT AT 1:38 A.M. ll Beach Bike Path: (Continued) 02992) /�-ls-yam Heard speaking in favor of a beach bike path were. Mr. Chuck Sheldon, 1734 Strand and Mr. Bill Vasek, 2108 Strand. Mr. Mike Raftis, 1061 - 3rd Street, spoke regarding his past involve- ment with the Hermosa Beach Land and Water Company, and stated his opinion that they had no interest at this time in the original dedication of the beach, and Mr. Frank CaLiquir, 34 - 3rd Street, doubted that bicyclists could be diverted up the hill above Hermosa Avenue. At one point during the above testimony Mayor Post called for a brief recess at 9:25 p.m. and the meeting was called back to order at 9:40 p.m. for additional testimony. Mr. Bruce Dunn, Attorney at Law with Bolton & Hemer, 900 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, Attorneys for ResidentsandTaxpayers of the City of Hermosa Beach, served a legal notice to the City council, the 'individual Councilpersons, the City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach that the construction of the County proposed bike path upon the city beach is prohibited as a matter of -law, that the municipality of Hermosa Beach is without the power to utilize the beach for said purpose, and that any such act to further the County proposal would constitute an ultra vires act on the part of the individual council persons, and that in the event of such ultra vires conduct on the part of any or all council persons, 'said individuals would ,incur personal liability for said acts. Councilman Doerflin3, Council representative and Chairman of the Bike Path committee, went on record with the information to the public that the City Council had authorized the establishment of a Bicycle Path Coordinating Committee on October 24, 1972,,to work with the City of Manhattan Beach at their request on an inter -city network of bike paths, with membership consisting of City Commission repre- sentatives and interested citizen volunteers. The first meeting was held on February 15, 1973, and this and succeeding meetings were held for the purpose of deciding upon the best possible bike routes throughout the community, primarily for the use of children going to and from school, to the beach, and to our various parks, and to investigate sources of funding for the design and construction of bike facilities. He stated that when the Manhattan Beach and R3dondo Beach Bike Paths were opened and public safety hazards and other problems on the Strand made it evident that the Committee should Y G/1. nri 0.4-1 +-114-A 1 TIY; f1Y1 I.;.P C._LY1 FAn. attemnt to establish alternate bike December 15 1992 HERMOSA BEACH MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, CITY MANAGER, CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK. DEAR MAYOR ROBERT ESSERTIER, COUNCIL MEMBERS, ROBERT BENZ, SAM EDGERTON, KATHLEEN MIDSTOKKE AND ALBERT WIEMANS, CITY MANAGER, RICHARD FERRIN, CITY ATTORNEY, CHARLES VOSE, AND CITY CLERK, ELAINE DOERFLING. ON DECEMBER 9 1992, WE SUBMITTED FOR FILING WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY CLERKS OFFICE A REFERENDUM PETITION AGAINST THE RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL SAID RESOLUTIO0 IDENTIFIED AS RESOLUTION NO. 92-5583 "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A SEVENTY (70) UNIT HOTEL WITH RETAIL, A RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE GENERAL ALCBHOL AND A HOTEL PIANO BAR/COCKTAIL LOUNGE WITH ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL," PASSED BY THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL ON NOVEMBER 10, 1992. WE REQUEST THAT THE CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS CODE 1990 CHAPTER 3, ARTICLE.fl'BE ENFORCED. SAID SECTIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 4053 PETITION FILING AND EXAMINATION OF SIGNATURES. PETITIONS SHALL BE ACCEPTED FOR FILING BY THE CLERK AND THE DETERMINATION OF THE NUMBER OF SIGNATURES THERON SHALL BE MADE BY THE CLERK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN SECTION 4008. PETITIONS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF THE CITY DURING NORMAL OFFICE HOURS AS POSTED. SECTION 4054 PETITION FILING AND EXAMINATION OF SIGNATURES. AFTER THE PETITION HAS BEEN FILED, AS HEREIN PROVIDED, THE CLERK SHALL EXAMINE THE PETITION AND CERTIFY THE RESULTS IN THE SAME MANNER AS OUR COUNTY PETITIONS IN SECTIONS 3707 AND 3708 EXCEPT THAT, FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, REFERENCES TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SHALL BE TREATED AS REFERENCES TO THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF THE CITY. THIS PETITION SHALL BE PRESERVED BY THE CITY CLERK IN THE SAME MANNER AS OUR COUNTY MEASURES AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 3756. THEREFORE THE CITY CLERK SHOULD PERFORM THE MINISTERIAL ACT OF ACCEPTING THE REFERENDUM PETITION FOR FILING IF SHE HAS NOT ALREADY DONE SO. THE CITY ATTORNEYS OPINION SHOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH THE CITY CLERKS MINISTERIAL DUTIES. WE DISAGREE WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OPINION CONTAINED IN HIS NOVEMBER 23, 1992 MEMORANDUM TO THE HERMOSA BEACH MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, REGARDING THE REFERENDUM. RESPECTFULLY 19toui 17Malti „f„,, JANET MC HUGH PARKER HERRIOTT )00---/s MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, November 24, 1992, at the hour of 7:40 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - the closed session was held at 7:10 P.M. regard- ing matters of litigation, Poliner vs. City of Hermosa Beach: pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a); and, matters of meet and confer. The closed session was recessed at 7:30 P.M. to the regular scheduled public meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mary Rooney, Community Resources Director ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Essertier Absent: None PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Carol Hunt - Exec. Dir., Chamber of Commerce, spoke on progress of the Business Advocacy Committee; thanked City staff, especially Mary Fehskens, for work on checklist for new businesses. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (f), with the exception of the following item which was removed for discussion in item 3, but is shown in order for clarity: (a) Wiemans. Motion Wiemans, second Edgerton. So ordered. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on November 10, 1992. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Wiemans for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To approve the minutes of the regular meeting of November 10, 1992, as amended in item 10(d), page 7984, third paragraph to show that Mr. Compton's comment had included reference to ten instances of cocaine buys involving "Besties"; and, fourth paragraph to show Mr. McAlinden's comment had included rebuttal that there had only been five instances of cocaine buys. Motion Wiemans. The motion was so directed by Mayor Essertier and accepted by the Council without objection. (The following final action took place after item no. 4, but is shown in order for clarity.) City Council Minutes 11-24-92 Page 7986 a (b) Final Action: To further amend the minutes of November 11, 1992, to show that Mr. McAlinden had stated that there were no findings that he had been personally in- volved in any of the cocaine buys. Motion Edgerton. The motion was so directed by Mayor Essertier and accepted by the Council, noting the objec- tion of Midstokke. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants No. 42432 and Nos. 42500 through 42608 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 42501, 42502, 42508, 52522, 42523, 42545 and 42546. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) (e) (f) Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. Recommendation to receive and file the October, 1992 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report. Action: To receive and file the October, 1992, finan- cial reports as presented. Recommendation to approve budget adjustments to the 1991/1992 budget for the Special Investigations Unit. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated November 16, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve a transfer of funds from the Asset Forfeiture Fund to the Special Investigations (narcotics related) Budget to balance for overages of $58,879 for the 1991-92 Fiscal Year, which included additional salary costs for an ad- ditional officer, equipment and repair maintenance as the budget for Special Investigations was moved from the General Fund to the Asset Forfeiture Fund. Recommendation to consider the purchase of 23 new ex- posed aggregate trash receptacles for bus stops at mid- year budget review. Memorandum from Public Works Direc- tor Charles McDonald dated November 17, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to consider the purchase of 23 new exposed aggregate trash recepta- cles for bus stops, at a total cost of $6,210, at the mid -year budget review. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None City Council Minutes 11-24-92 Page 7987 .ems4,444 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Item 1(a) was heard at this time, but is shown in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Cyril M. Yates, 911 17th Street, dated November 9, 1992 regarding request for re -painting of red zone across the street from his property. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Cyril Yates - 911 17th Street, submitted photos of the area of 17th Street behind his garage; said he felt the wrong area had been painted red and asked that additional curb be painted red to allow B.F.I. refuse trucks to maneuver the tight ess curve and to allow him to back his car from his garage. City Manager Ferrin stated that he had asked the Fire Department to take the Fire Truck on 17th Street and there was no maneuverability problem; nor was there a problem backing a Jeep four by four out of the driveway (Mr. Yates said that at the time this was done, the cars that usually presented the problem were not parked on the street.) Action: To re -paint the red areas across from Mr. Yates' garage for safety measures. Motion Midstokke, second Mayor Essertier. The motion carried unanimously. At this time a motion was made by Edgerton, seconded by Benz, to reconsider the amendments to the minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 10, 1992. There was no objection from the Council and the action is shown under item 1(a) for clarity. (At 7:55 P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to item no. 8, Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager, as it was earlier than the time announced for the public hearing, item no. 5.) PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO SECTION 10 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO CHANGE MANDATED CONDI- TIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS TO RECOMMENDED CONDI- TIONS, AND TO AMEND THE RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FOR AL- COHOL ESTABLISHMENTS, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum from Planning Director City Council Minutes 11-24-92 Page 7988 Michael Schubach dated November 16, 1992, with Ordinance for introduction. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report andresponded to Council questions. The public hearing was opened at 8:10 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, questioned if a C.U.P. could only be changed at a public hearing (City Attorney Vose responded the only exception would be judicial change); and, Janet McHugh - 718 1st Place, questioned if more restrictions were being placed on outdoor al- cohol service (Planning Director Schubach re- sponded that this would apply to screening in an area where alcohol might be passed out of an establishment to someone on public property if screens were not in place.) The public hearing was closed at 8:17 P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation and intro- duce Ordinance No. 92-1079. Motion Benz, second Mayor Essertier. The motion car- ried, noting the dissenting votes of Midstokke and Wie- mans, both expressing objections to Section 2. Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 92-1079, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OP HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT REGARDING STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR ON -SALE AND OFF -SALE ALCOHOL ESTABLISHMENTS AND TO CHANGE THE MANDATED CONDI- TIONS FOR OTHER CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES TO RECOM- MENDED CONDITIONS AND TO ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Benz, second Edgerton. AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Essertier NOES: None MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. DOWNTOWN MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS This item was withdrawn from the agenda prior to the regular meeting. 7. REVISED STREET SWEEPING SCHEDULE - REDUCTION OF FOUR HOUR NO PARKING ZONES TO TWO HOUR ZONES. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated Novem- ber 16, 1992. City Council Minutes 11-24-92 Page 7989 Public Works Director McDonald presented the staff re- port and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation nos. 1 and 2: to schedule a public hearing, at least one month later, in order to receive input from the citizens regarding changing the hours of street sweeping from 8:00 A.M. through 4:00 P.M. to 9:00 A.M. through 5:00 P.M., and to add: 3) a report of the revenue from street sweeping tickets; 4) a report of the cost of stickers for the signs; and, 5) a split start time of 8:00 A.M. in the commercial areas and 9:00 A.M. in residential areas with small maps showing the divisions in the City with the time changes by area. Motion Midstokke, second Mayor Essertier. So ordered. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager Ferrin reminded the audience and the press that there would be only one Council meeting in Decem- ber, on December 15, 1992, the third Tuesday of the month as opposed to the regular meeting dates of the second and fourth Tuesday of every month. And, reported that the Planning Commission had accepted the date of Tuesday, December 8, 1992, as the date of the joint City Council/Planning Commission workshop (the agenda is listed under item no. 9(b).) 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Official Canvass - Special Municipal Election, November 3, 1992. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated November 18, 1992, with Resolution for adoption. Supplemental memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated November 24, 1992, with amended page two of the Resolution (for County final vote count.) Action: To adopt Resolution No. 92-5584, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 1992, CONSOLI- DATED WITH THE GENERAL ELECTION, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW.", as amended on page two to show the final vote count by the Los An- geles County Registrar/Recorder. Motion Midstokke, second Wiemans. So ordered. (b) Date and time for joint meeting of City Council/Planning Commission. Memorandum from Planning Commission dated November 19, 1992. City Council Minutes 11-24-92 Page 7990 (This item was heard with item no. 8, but is shown in order for clarity.) Planning Director Schubach responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the date of Tuesday, December 8, 1992, at the hour of 7:30 P.M., for a joint meeting with the Planning Commission. And to approve the agenda as: 1) Land Use Element Revision; and, 2) R/UDAT; 3) with sub -topics of: a) Public parking on right-of-way along Beach Drive; b) recent passage of initiative for "Biltmore" site; and, c) strand walk and wall refurbishment. The action was so directed by Mayor Essertier with the consensus of the Council. (At 8:00 P.M., the order of the agenda was returned to the public hearing at item no. 5.) 10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Support for local candidate for election to the new Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (see attached letters). Appointment of delegate to at- tend L. A. County City Selection Committee meeting to be held in Alhambra on December 3rd at 6:15 p.m. (see at- tached agenda). Supplemental letter from Harold Croyts, Mayor of Lomita, dated November 23, 1992. Supplemental letter from Kenneth Landau, Gardena City Manager, dated November 19, 1992. City Council Secretary Laurie Duke said that Mayor Es- sertier was the Hermosa Beach delegate and explained the process needed if a substitution was made. Delegate Mayor Essertier stated that he would attend the meeting. Action: To authorize Mayor Essertier to cast Hermosa's two votes for Jacki Bacharach as delegate to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA). Motion Midstokke, second Wiemans. So ordered. Final Action: To authorize Mayor Essertier to cast Her- mosa's two votes for Abbe Land as alternate delegate to LACMTA. Motion Wiemans, second Mayor Essertier. So ordered. Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: City Council Minutes 11-24-92 Page 7991 (b) Request by Councilmember Midstokke for review of Resolu- tion No. 90-5405 and Ordinance No. 90-1047 regarding notification to City Council of illegal sales of con- trolled substances for purposes of consideration of re- vocation of business license. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, said that a report in a newspaper stated that a judge had found the owner of "Besties" guilty of a drug related offense and this was what Mr. McAlinden was appealing. (Councilmember Edgerton refuted this statement and said he would bring in docu- ments to set the record straight.) (C) Action: To have the Council re -affirm that the City Manager proceed as directed in Ordinance No. 90-1047 and Resolution No. 90-5405 to advise the Council whenever some substance related activity, within the City limits, results in a criminal conviction, for the purpose of possible license revocation if it relates to the opera- tion of a business. Motion Midstokke, second Wiemans. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz. Request by Councilmember Midstokke for a letter to be directed to MultiVision re. regular televising of Coun- cil meetings, replays, agendas and notification to City if there is a change. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Chantel Hargis - Multivision Cable TV, said the public access channel would be split by Decem- ber 1, 1992, and the station was trying hard to resolve its personnel problems; and, Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, asked the Council to word its letter to Multivision very strongly due to the many problems. (d) Action: To direct staff to send a letter to Multivision Cable TV requesting that a regular schedule besetand kept after the Channel is split, and all other matters listed in the request. Motion Midstokke, second Mayor Essertier. So ordered. Request by Councilmember Midstokke for consideration of reactivation of Student -of -the -Month and enactment of Teacher -of -the -Quarter. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Cathy McCurdy - Hermosa Beach School Board President, asked that this be continued for discussion with the new school administration; volunteered to bring the subject up as soon as possible with the Board and the Superintendent. City Council Minutes 11-24-92 Page 7992 (e) Action: To approve the suggestion of Ms. McCurdy and wait until it can be discussed by the School Board and new Superintendent. Motion Edgerton, second Midstokke. So ordered. Request by Councilmember Midstokke for staff to nego- tiate with Easy Reader re. publication of City Council agenda in newspaper. City Manager Ferrin requested that an agenda printed so far in advance be titled "Tentative Only". City Attor- ney Vose suggested that it not be listed as an agenda but state only that the following items may be coming before the City Council. Action: To direct staff to come back with a report on the cost of publication and to address the concerns of the City Attorney regarding potential problems of items added or pulled after publication. Motion Midstokke, second Mayor Essertier. So ordered, noting the objections of Edgerton and Wiemans. (f) Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of abolish- ing minutes from Closed Session. (g) Proposed Action: To take both action and discussion minutes in open and closed session and that the video tapes of all regular meetings be kept. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion was withdrawn and replaced with a reworded proposed action. Proposed Action: To go back to the type of discussion minutes for closed session that had been taken earlier. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Midstokke, Wiemans and Mayor Essertier. There was no further action taken on this item. Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of direct- ing staff members to take direction only from City Man- ager; also any direction of City Manager by individual Councilmembers without consensus of Council should be ignored. Councilmember Wiemans requested the City Manager only take action on a request by the majority of the Council. Councilmember Midstokke expressed concern with telephone polls of the Council that did not allow public discus- sion of an item. Action: To reaffirm that staff members take direction only from the City Manager and that the City Manager take action only by a majority vote of the Council. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. So ordered. City Council Minutes 11-24-92 Page 7993 CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council at this time was: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, questioned statements made by City Treasurer Gary Brutsch in a "Letter to the Editor" published in the Daily Breeze. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, recessed on Tuesday, November 24, 1992, at the hour of 9:25 P.M. to a closed session for the pur- pose of discussion of matters of Personnel: Meet and Confer. The closed session adjourned on Tuesday, November 24, 1992, at the hour of 9:55 P.M. to the Joint Workshop Meeting with the Planning Commission to be held on Tuesday, December 8, 1992, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Deputy City C erk City Council Minutes 11-24-92 Page 7994 �.1 Ld FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:49:56 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION - • -- PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT --SYS; RETIREMENT/OCT 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT ADV/OCT 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT -SYS: RETIREMENT/OCT 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 11/25/92 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 5 AMOUNT --'DATE INVC PROJ 5 - ACCOUNT -DESCRIPTION H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.- RETIREMENT/OCT 92 H ----- PUB EMPLOYEES -RETIREMENT -SYS. RETIREMENT/OCT 92 00026 ----001-400-1213-4180 -- 00628 11/23/92 RETIREMENT - 00026 -- 001-400-1213-4180 00629'- 11/23/92 RETIREMENT 00026 --- --- 105-400-2601-4180 - -- 00190 11/23/92 STREET LIGHTING -- 00026 -109-400-3301-4180 00060- 11/23/92 VEH PKG DIST - H - PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT -SYS. t RETIREMENT/OCT 92 £ �;a • PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT --SYS. I RETIREMENT/OCT 92 00026------110-400-3302-4180 00194- 11/23/92 PARKING ENF 00026-------115-400-8141-4180 00006- 11/23/92 CIP 89-141 00026 - ----115-400-8144-4180 --- 00006 11/23/92 CIP 90-144 H - PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. ------00026 RETIREMENT/OCT 92 11/23/92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT -SYS. -00026-- 11/23/92 RETIREMENT/OCT 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS:- - -- 00026 RETIREMENT/OCT 92 11/23/92 H PUB EMPLOYEES -RETIREMENT --SYS- 00026- - RETIREMENT/OCT 92 11/23/92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. - 00026 RETIREMENT/OCT 92 11/23/92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT -SYS: RETIREMENT/OCT 92 -115-400-8178-4180 00006--- CIP 90-178 125-400-8513-4180 00006 CIP 92-513 155-400-2102-4180 00165 CROSSING GUARD -160-400-3102-4180 -00191 SEWER/ST DRAIN 160-400-8408-4180 00006 CIP 89-408 00026 - --170-400-2103-4180 - 00063 11/23/92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. ------00026 RETIREMENT/OCT 92 11/23/92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT -SYS. RETIREMENT/OCT 92 SPEC INVESTGTNS 705-400-1209-4180 00114 LIABILITY INS 00026 ---705-400-1217-4180 --00116 11/23/92 WORKERS COMP $93,004.68 /RETIREMENT -- - $96, 943. 88CR /RETIREMENT $1,18956 /RETIREMENT $152.24 /RETIREMENT INV/REF $4,625:73 - /RETIREMENT $71.10 /RETIREMENT $113:48 /RETIREMENT /4.2_../ S -�J PAGE 0001 DATE 11/25/92--N PO 5 CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP---- -$270.08---- /RETIREMENT XP -- $270.08----- /RETIREMENT $67.28 /RETIREMENT $114.77 /RETIREMENT -51.052:52 /RETIREMENT $71.10 /RETIREMENT $5.683.57 /RETIREMENT 5.683.57- /RETIREMENT $263.36 /RETIREMENT -- 42609 $0.00 11/25/92 $0.00 42609 -- 11/25/92 42609 J J 15 $0.00 11/25/92 :6 42609 $0.00 11/25/92 fa 42609 ,' - -- 50.00 11/25/92 :o 42609 $0.00 11/25/92 42609 $0.00 11/25/92 ‘4 $0.00 42609 11/25/92 42609 $0.00 11/25/92 $0.00 42609 11/25/92 42609 $0.00 11/25/92 J - 42609 $0.00 11/25/92 J 42609---- $0.00 2609- $0.00 11/25/92 , 1 42609 $0.00 11/25/92 $33783 /RETIREMENT $0.00 11/25/92 J 12 4 • lb • . I r FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:49:56 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN #AMOUNT PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ 4 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION . *** VENDOR TOTAL ******+ ****************************+ *************************+►******---$10.073.-42:---- *** PAY CODE TOTAL******************************************************************. .... $10,073.42 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST • FOR 11/25/92 ------ PAGE 0002 DATE 11/25/92 -1' INV/REF PO 4k CHK 4 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** R A -A BACKFLOW TESTING & MAINT.--- 04912 -001-400-3101-4201-00126 $340.00 /CONTRACT SERV TEST BACKFLOW DEVICES 18595 10/08/92 MEDIANS ICE/PRIVAT 001-400-6101-4201 --- 00301- - $340.00 A -A BACKFLOW TESTING & MAINT. - TEST BACKFLOW DEVICES 18595 VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************--- - 4680.00 -- 00935 001-400-2101-4309 00576 - /MAINTENANCE $1.192.12 1.12.12ATERIALS 09/29/92 POLICE 04912 10/08/92 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS D. A. R. E. ROBOT REPAIR 4__.*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************- 4 r. 3,1 14' 51 .7' 191 R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS PRISONER MEALS/NOV 92 7169 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************---------446.75 ---$1,192.12 - - - 00857 001-400-2101-4306 --01285 $46.75 11/17/92 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 04620 001-400-4601-4221 00091 -- $147.00 - R LL*CLASETA FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 11/10/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PR GR ***-VENDOR TOTAL-********************************************************************-- $147.00-------- R BANC ONE LEASING CORPORATION --. - 03422 001-400-2101-6900 00598 ----- *15,SE585.75S 75 LEASE PMT/PATROL CARS PMT -1 11/25/92 POLICE $15.585.75 ***-VENDOR-TOTAL--*****************************.*************************************** - 4+ 4'- w. •,' 50 51 BANK OF AMERICA BANK CHARGES/OCT 92 R BANK OF AMERICA --- BANK CHARGES/SEP 92 51 - I„ 18595 05264 42612 +; *340.00 11/25/92 q z l zi 18595 05264 $340.00 42612 11/25/92 27 05089 42613 $0.00 11/25/92 I.J , J 7169 00115 42614 ii $0.00 11/25/92 0;-. I: - 05737 42615 `-1 $0.00 11/25/92 a- at i.. PMT -1 00076 $0.00 42616 - 11/25/92 -- 61 3879 42 7 01195 001-400-1141-4201 00132 $2,437.12 0 $8.90 11265792 11/19/92 CITY TREASURER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT _ S4.02 ....---- ------03877 ---- 11/19/929CITY0 1/- -001-400-114TREASURER /CONTRACTSERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/25/92 41- 554 56 1 :a 1 I,. 3._ 1,i CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 14:49:56 FOR -11/25/92 PAGE 0003 DATE 11/25/92 PAY VENDOR NAME VND K ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 11 AMOUNT INV/REF PO N CHK * DESCRIPTION ---- •-•----------DATE INVC PROJ # -ACCOUNT-DESCRIPTION -- AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R ---- BANK OF AMERICA BANK CHARGES/AUG 92 *** VENDOR TOTAL 01193 -001-400-1141-4201 00134 -$2,286.30 11/19/92 CITY TREASURER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $7,277.44 03876 --• 42617 60.00 11/25/92 R BELL & HOWELL -----. 00563 001-400-4201-4201 . - 00819 - ----- - $587.00 --- - - 890600 04259 MICROFILM READER MAINT 90600 11/18/92 BUILDING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $587.00 - BLACKTOP MATERIALS -CO:--- MISC CHARGES/OCT 92 -04352-- -- 001-400-3103-4309 01441 --- - -- - - $129.10 • 10/31/92 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** - $129.10 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/10-28/11-19 -----02016 --- 001-400-1121-4305 --- 00222--- ---------$8.12 11/23/92 CITY CLERK /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES -02016 001-400-1202-4305 00452---- - - $0.75 11/23/92 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 02016 - - 001-400-1207-4305 - 00286 - ----- $8.12 - 11/23/92 BUS LICENSE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 02016 001-400-2101-4305 01879 -- $0.75 11/23/92 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER - PETTY CASH/10-28/11-19 R------GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER - PETTY CASH/10-28/11-19 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/10-28/11-19 - GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER ------- PETTY CASH/10-28/11-19 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/10-28/11-19 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITYTREASURER PETTY CASH/10-28/11-19 R----- GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/10-28/11-19 02016 -001-400-2101-4315 -00224 $25.00 11/23/92 POLICE /MEMBERSHIP - 02016 001-400-2101-4316 00959 $36.00 11/23/92 POLICE /TRAINING 02016 - - 001-400-2201-4309- 11/23/92 FIRE 00109 $0.00 42618 -- 11/25/92 42619 -- 11/25/92 03878 ------ 42621 $0.00 11/25/92 • 03878 - 42621 -� $0.00 11/25/92 01402- $10.82 -- -- /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 02016 001-400-3101-4309 00168 - $16.24 ,11/23/92 MEDIANS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY -TREASURER PETTY CASH/10-28/11-19 02016 001-400-3103-4309 01440 $20.56 11/23/92 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 03878 ---- 42621 $0.00 . 11/25/92 03878 - 42621 $0.00 11/25/92 03878 ---- 42621 $0.00 11/25/92 03878 42621 $0.00 11/25/92 03878 ---- 42621 -- $0.00 11/25/92 3 I0 I ,4 rs 1. 14 10 1, .4 41 .5 03878 42621 --' $0.00 11/25/92 03878 ------ 42621---- �'° $0.00 11/25/92 . 71 !1 IJ 74 431. 4110. .4111, + 3 v Tad ' 1., FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:49:56 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER --- PETTY CASH/10-28/11-19 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/10-28/11-19 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/10-28/11-19 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/10-28/11-19 R GARY*BRUTSCH,-CITY-TREASURER— PETTY CASH/10-28/11-19 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/10-28/11-19 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 11/25/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ---- 02016 - • - - 11/23/92 02016 11/23/92 02016 11/23/92 02016 11/23/92 ----02016 11/23/92 ----------- R GARY*BRUTSCH, -CITY TREASURER -- PETTY CASH/10-28/11-19 * * * 44 4Y1 RGARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/10-29/11-19 R R VENDOR -TOTAL 02016 - 11/23/92 ----02016 -- 11/23/92 - - 02016 11/23/92 001-400-3104-4309 - 00987 TRAFFIC SAFETY 001-400-4101-4305 00657 PLANNING 001-400-4201-4305 00811- BU1LDING 001-400-4204-4309 02512 BLDG MAINT 001-400-4601-4302 00199 COMM RESOURCES 001-400-4601-4305 01100 COMM RESOURCES -001-400-4601-4308 00773 COMM RESOURCES INV/REF — - $27.05 /MAINTENANCE MATER I ALS 001-400-4601-4315 00110 - COMM RESOURCES $38.61 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $12.45 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $9.20 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS --$36.05 /ADVERTISING $14.36 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES --$19.50 /PROGRAM MATERIALS CI 00 - /MEMBERSHIP ******************************************************************** 4291.58 CA STATE UNIV DOMINGUEZ HILLS SPRING TUITION/V. MOHLER -3321 VENDOR TOTAL THE*CALIF PARK & REC. SOCIETY DUES/ESSLINGER 00412 001-400-1202-4316 00432 $697.00 11/24/92 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING $697.0o 00602 001-400-4601-4315 00111 $110.00 11/10/92 COMM RESOURCES /MEMBERSHIP VENDOR TOTAL * ***** *** ***** ******************************************************------$110.00- R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLS/NOV 92 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLS/NOV 92 ••-.144.444. 00016 001-400-3101-4303 00246 11/16/92 MEDIANS $672.71 - /UTILITIES 00016 001-400-4204-4303 00625 $465.41 11/16/92 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES PAGE 0004 a DATE 11/25/92 P041 CI -1K# AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ° 03878 42621 $0.00 11/25/92 03878 42621 $0.00 11/25/92 03878 42621 ---, $0.00 11/25/92 1 03878 42621 $0.00 11/25/92 •!2 03878 42621 $0.00 11/25/92 03678 - 42621 $0.00 11/25/92 1, 4 ro 03878 --- 42621 $0.00 11/25/92 03878 42621 $0.00 11/25/92 it • k; .4 lo 567-74-3321 05624 $0. 00 42622 11/25/92 05754 42623 $0.00 11/25/92 01111 42624 $0.00 11/25/92 01111 -- 42624 30.00 11/25/92 4 J •J r v � I FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:49:56 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R - CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE --- WATER BILLS/NOV 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 11/25/92 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * - ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION --- 00016 --- --- 001-400-6101-4303 --- 00482 -- - --- $2,201.49 - 11/16/92 PARKS /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************,r******************-r******- *-i►**************-r*-r**** R CENTINELA SO. BAY VISA NOV EXPENSE/R. FERRIN R CENTINELA SO. BAY VISA NOVEMBER EXP/BLACKWOOD 03353 --- ------ 001-400-1201-4316 --- 00077 11/23/92 CITY MANAGER PAGE .0005 DATE 11/25/92 INV/REF PO * CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP -- -- $3.339.61 - $161:-18 /TRAINING 03353 - 001-400-1203-4201 00983 -- - - $51. 90 11/23/92 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CONNECTING POINT LEASING- - I.i COMPUTER RENTAL/NOV 92 32331 y •�I CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENTAL/NOV 92 32331 41* rl I]I R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENTAL/NOV 92 32331 CONNECTING POINT LEASING- --- COMPUTER RENTAL/NOV 92 32331 $213. 08 --------03617 - 001-400-2101-4201 -- 01158--- $489.57 11/17/92 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR 03617 - ------001-400-2201-4201— 00345— -- ----- $159. 40 - - ---- 11/17/92 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR - 03617 001-400-2701-4201 00061--- $330.18 11/17/92 CIVIL DEFENSE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR IVAT IVAT IVAT 3732331 01111 $0. 00 42624- 11/25/92 2624-11/25/92 02167 ---- 42625--- $0. 00 11/25/92 .J� 3 SAO 4 e , aY 12 1) 14 1S i5 to 05520 42625 -' $0.00 11/25/92 00051 $0. 00 •- 42626 ----'n 11/25/92 y" 3732331_-- 00051 ------- 42626 $0.00 11/25/92 3732331 00051 42626 $0.00 11/25/92 ----- 03617 -- -- 170-400-2103-4201 - 00130 ----- -- $159.39 - -- 3732331-00051 ----- 42626 11/17/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/25/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** - 1/ Lin VW $1,138.54 31 R -- DANIEL FREEMAN LAX MED. -CLINIC -----02390------001-400-1203-4320 ---00435----------$129.00--. -- ---004971-00- 05514 -- ' EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS/OCT92 71-00 11/09/92 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS $0.00 11/25/92 ti 51 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************- $129. 00 R - --- DATA SAFE ---00156 ------001-400-1206-4201 01068 --- - --- $222.00 - __--. _-_. _ -__-65250 -00015 ---42628--- TAPE STOR/11-12 TO 12-11 65250 11/12/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/25/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************...._.. $222.00 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION COMPUTER MAINT/PD/NOV 92 13693 00269 - ----001-400-2101-4201 ---01157-- --- $913.32 341013693- 00007 - 11/06/92 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 • 42629----- 11/25/92 2629-----•--=11/25/92 J .,y vi .,y FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:49:56 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0006 - FOR 11/25/92 ----- DATE 11/25/92- VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK N •DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION. .. - AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP •--- R - DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION -----00269 -. ---001-400-2201-4201----00344---•-- -- 3608.87 341013693 • 00007 42629 COMPUTER MAINT/PD/NOV 92 13693 11/06/92 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 30.00 11/25/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL=************************************•******************•*********•rarer*•*.-...-.- - $1,522,19 4 6 7 6 R DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPLY ---04394 -- 001-400-2101-4306 ----01287------ ---- 4136.61 • --074575 01022 42630 --- MISC. CHARGES/OCT 92 74575 11/03/92 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 30.00 11/25/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************-.---......--- $136.61 11 F :3 - R - EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY--- •--- --------- 02840 - --- 001-400-1208-4201 00941 ---- - - -- $271.22 - - - 006M39739- 01025 - -42631 -- —= COPIER USAGE/SEP 92 39739 11/01/92 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 30.00 11/25/92 _, 27 R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY - . -02840 ... 001-400-1208-4201 00942 - $298.00 •- 006M39739 01025 42631 - --" COPIER MAINT/OCT 92 39739 11/01/92 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 30.00 11/25/92 ,, -**a►-VENDOR-TOTAL********************************************************************- -4569. 22 71 R EYEDEAL INTERIORS, INC. - 04947 001-400-4204-4309 02513 3189.37 18647 05291 42632 FLOORING/COMM CENTER 18647 10/29/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 30.00 11/25/92 7.. _-*** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************---- .'11 4 •7 41 R ROBIN*FOX 04956 001-210-0000-2110 05150 3250.00 49528 05445 42633 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 49528 11/19/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 30.00 11/25/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************---- ----4250.00 11 • 91 /4 R - GTEL 01340 001-400-1101-4304 00515 - 33.62 MN05413 00067 42635 -- PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 05413 11/10/92 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 30.00 11/25/92 R GTEL -04 r 1J r X42• 01340 - ---- 001-400-1121-4304 00580- - $9:82 ------ MN05413 - 00067 ------42635.---- PHONE ---42635 ---PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 05413 11/10/92 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE 30.00 11/25/92 •,:,�qj GTEL - ----- 01340 - 001-400-1131-4304 00417 -. $5.16 MN05413 00067 42635 - =' PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 05413 11/1C/92 30.00 11/25/92 J MN05413--00067 -- 42635-- --;:- $0. 2635--- 30. 00 11/25/92 4/ 51 R GTEL — PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 05413 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 01340- ---001-400-1141-4304 - 00595 — - $9.82 11/10/92 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE r7 72 '3 ra 66 .30 lifr441.44/134.,r:."1.: OP a FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:49:56 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R -- GTEL -- - PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 05413 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 11/25/92 PAGE .0007 DATE 11/25/92 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ R---ACCOUNT--DESCRIPTION - AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP -- 01340 --- 11/10/92 .. 01340 05413 11/10/92 R GTEL - - - • ----- PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 05413 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 05413 R GTEL - PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 05413 i.t Ito '.7 5' S4 GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 05413 GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 05413 R GTEL • • PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 R GTEL _ .. . PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 05413 -01340--- 11/10/92 01340-- -11/10/92 01340 11/10/92 01340 11/10/92 01340 - 11/10/92 01340 11/10/92 .01340 11/10/92 --01340---- 05413 11/10/92 - -- 01340 05413 11/10/92 R - 1---- GTEL - PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 05413 R GTEL - PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 05413 R-------------- PHONEHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 05413 GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 05413 R - GTEL - - PHONE SYS MAINT/NOV 92 05413 01340- 11/10/92 1340-11/10/92 01340 11/10/92 01340 11/10/92 01340 11/10/92 01340 11/10/92 001-400-1201-4304-00645--------- $8.-27 --- --- MN05413 00067 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 001-400-1202-4304 00650 - $29.96 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE -- 001-400-1203-4304 • 00660----•- - 612. 40 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 001-400-1206-4304 00576 614.98 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 001-400-1207-4304 00453 $9.82 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE 001-400-1208-4304 00258 - $5:16 GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE 001-400-2101-4304----01143 - $193.-73 POLICE /TELEPHONE - 001-400-2201-4304 ---00501----- - $5.16 FIRE /TELEPHONE 001-400-2401-4304 ---- 00506 - ----- - --- -- $7.23 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE 001-400-4101-4304 00653 -- 324.80 PLANNING /TELEPHONE -001-400-4201-4304 ----00583 $39.-78 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 001-400-4202-4304 00708 --- $54.76 -- PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE 001-400-4601-4304 00761----- - - - 614.98 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 001-400-6101-4304 00464 $5.16 PARKS /TELEPHONE 110-400-3302-4304 --- - 00667------------ 661-99 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE 42635 ---- 30.00 11/25/92 MN05413 00067 30. 00 MN05413 00067 -- 42635 $0.00 11/25/92 MN05413 00067 42635 - 30. 00 11/25/92 MN05413 00067 30. 00 MN05413 00067 MN05413 42635 -- 11/25/92 42635 11/25/92 42635 -- $0.00 11/25/92 w, 00067 ------- 42635 ---- $0.00 -- 30.00 11/25/92 ..J U I•� 15 r 18 r•, 23 J4 MN05413 00067 42635 -- $0.00 11/25/92 w MN05413 - 00067 ---- 42635 ---i` 30.00 11/25/92 10 MN05413 00067 42635 - $0. 00 11/25/92 MN05413-00067 -42635- 42635 -- $0.00 11/25/92-I 1 MN05413 00067 42635 -- $0. 00 11/25/92 MN05413--00067-----42635---- $0.00 N05413--00067-----42635---- 30.00 11/25/92 •n MN05413 00067 42635 30.00 11/25/92 MN05413 - 00067 30. 00 42635--- 11/25/92 br d .30 4010 6 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:49:56 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION I -- *** VENDOR TOTAL (DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0008 • FOR 11/25/92-.------ DATE 11/25/92 -- "VND Ik ' ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK M -------- $516. 60 - - AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP y R JANICE*GUERRERO 04331 001-400-4601-4221 00088 $308.00 05755 42636 , FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 11/18/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR $0.00 11/25/92 • 1 I --- *** VENDOR TOTAL_*************** ******* ********************************************** *** VENDOR TOTAL *********'********************************************* ************* -$308.00 - R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. .. - - 00731 001-400-3103-4311 00824 -- $304.53 STREET SWEEPER PARTS 5843 11/04/92 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR, TOTAL******************************************************************** $304.53 5843 05294 42637- $0.00 2637-$0.00 11/25/92 �...- R CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH - 04075 - 705-400-1217-4182 00255--- $28,801.67 05521 42638 -- REIMB WORK COMP/NOV 92 11/23/92 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR $0.00 11/25/92 I n, $28,801.67 R INDEPENDENT ORD. OF ODDFELLOWS ----02591 001-210-0000-2110 05149 - $500.00 47646 05444 42639 - DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 47646 11/12/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 11/25/92 ***-VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************..-- $500.00 ...- R INTERNATIONAL CONF OF BUILDING 00667 001-400-4201-4315 00119 - $175.00 M78477 04260 42640 ANNUAL DUES/BUILDING 78477 11/12/92 BUILDING /MEMBERSHIP ***_VENDOR TOTAL_******************************************************************** $175.00 R CARRIE*KESSLER 04957 - 110-300-0000-3302- 48837 CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 02674 11/24/92 $0.00 11/25/92 $20.00 - 2302674 05623 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 -***.VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** - ---- $20.00 42641 11/25/92 R LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 00842 - 001-400-1101-4315 00134 $2,630.00 23357 02168 42642 ANNUAL DUES/FY 92-93 23357 11/23/92 CITY COUNCIL /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 11/25/92 ***-VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************+************************-------$2.630.00----- -- - LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES--- -- 03261 - -- - 001-400-1101-4316 - 00002 ---- -- - - $20.00 -- ---- - -- --- - 02169 42643 REG FEES/ESSERTIER 11/25/92 CITY COUNCIL /TRAINING $0.00 11/25/92 4. 4101 J • • FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 14:49:56 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 11/25/92 PAGE -0009 DATE 11/25/92 PAY VENDOR NAME VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK * DESCRIPTION DATE INVC- PROD 6--ACCOUNT-DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL -----*20.00 - ' L. I. R DENNIS*LINDSEY 03708 001-400-4601-4221 00093 $1.617.00 05752 42644 rI,1 SOFTBALL LEAG DIRECTOR 11/19/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR 30.00 11/25/92 1•, I.. r. I'° rr 131 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** -- 61. 617. 00 - N e 10 J J ,4 19 Ilk !e R MANHATTAN CAR WASH - 01146 001-400-2101-4311 01540 369.75 01045 42645 -- MISC CHARGES/OCT 92 10/31/92 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 30.00 11/25/92 ., :, J R •- MANHATTAN CAR WASH ---------------01146 ---- 001-400-4101-4311 00172 63.80 - 01045 42645 . MISC CHARGES/OCT 92 10/31/92 PLANNING /AUTO MAINTENANCE *0.00 11/25/92 .,, *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** . 373.55 - .r, 11 R COMMANDER JOHN*MEBIUS 04322 ---- 170-400-2103-4322 -- 00070 ---- --- • $2,730.00 06107 42646 - REIMB NARCOTICS FUND 11/18/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /UNCLASSIFIED $0.00 11/25/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** .. „5 3.3 R KURT*MICHEL REIMB MILES/POST CLASS - 62.730.00 02719 - 001-400-2101-4312 - 02037 --- *157.46 ------ 04598 ------ 42647 --- 11/18/92 —11/18/92 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST 30.00 11/25/92 <, m *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 57 KATHLEEN*MIDSTOKKE MONTHLY EXP/'NOV 92 6157. 46 01549 - -- 001-400-1101-4316 00003-- --- ----- 618.-00 11/23/92 CITY COUNCIL /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL ******•nor********************•ir*************************************** _ *18. 00 --- BRENDAN*MOIR - THEATRE TECH/11-18-92 02166 ---- 42648 - -� '-2e 30.00 11/25/92 �.1. ,! - 04660 --- 001-400-4601-4201 01609 ---- 6104. 50 — 05770 42649 -- 11/19/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/25/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** - *104. 50 R PACIFIC SCREEN PRINT — ---00491 --- - 001-400-4601-4308 00774--------- 6271.92 ---3751--05731 ----42650 STAFF SHIRTS/COMM RES 3751 11/05/92 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS 3259.80 11/25/92 rk7. • 14 r FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:49:56 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0010 FOR 11/25/92 -------------- ... DATE 11/25/92 VND k ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 6 AMOUNT INV/REF PO 6 CHK 6 DATE INVC PROJ 6 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL __----- $271.92 R PEP BOYS 00608 001-400-2101-4311 01541 $74.34 070465 01156 42651 MISC. CHARGES/NOV 92 70465 11/18/92 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 11/25/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************+r*******•n*******•n*****------"----"$74. 34 - - R POSTAGE ON CALL- -- - - 04091 001-400-1208-4305 01151 - $2,008.00 - 51697214 08074 42652 POSTAGE METER RESET 97214 11/18/92 -, GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 11/25/92 VENDOR TOTAL******************************************•n*************************-------$2,008.00 -R BARRY*REED FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 03991 001-400-4601-4221 00092 -- $441.00 05756 42653 11/18/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR $0.00 11/25/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************....--------$441.00 R - REGENTS, U.C. 03885 001-400-2101-4316 00958 $35.00 04600 42654 S, SEMINAR REG/J. PELKA 11/24/92 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 11/25/92 ;' -----*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** -$35.00._ R DWAIN*RODUE 02859 001-400-4601-4221 00089 $196.00 05735 42655 ,� FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 11/10/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR $0.00 11/25/92 I,. -*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** --- $196.00-- �` ! It I�-'-I R LAURA*ROZZI 04623 001-400-4601-4221 00090 $340.20 05739 42656 I, FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 11/10/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR $0.00 11/25/92 fi•z ^ *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** - - - $340.20-._..._-._. ...._.. R SINCLAIR PAINT CO.01399 110-400-3302-4309 00871 $82.27 01061 42657 • *04, MISC CHARGES/OCT 92 10/31/92 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 11/25/92 i M *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************,_-.--- --- C +0 ii2 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY -- - 00114 -001-400-2101-4306 - 01286 $87.23 01162 42658 MISC CHARGES/OCT-NOV 92 11/18/92 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 11/25/92 - 157 t< r. 1"i 1 '1 F-• M FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:49:56 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0011 FOR 11/25/92 DATE 11/25/92 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT INV/REF PO it CHK N DATE INVC - - PROJ N - -- ACCOUNT --DESCRIPTION - ------------ AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP --- SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY MISC CHARGES/OCT-NOV 92 00114 -----001-400-4601-4308-- -00776--- ------- $198. 65 -- 4--- 11/18/92 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL ************** ****** ►************** ►** ►**************************** - $285. 88 -- 01162 --- 42658- $0.00 2658-$0.00 11/25/92 R -•---- G. SCOTT*SMITH 03377 - 001-400-4601-4201 ---- 01608 $400.00 - - --- --- ------.-5753 ___ _ TENNIS TOURNEY DIRECTOR 11/12/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 0$0.00 11/25//92 *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************-***********************************----- -$400.00 -- R SO CAL PUB LAB REL COUNCIL REG/BLACKWOOD/VANOLE 1" z 16 1/ 1•, - 11 01209.. ---001-400-1203-4316 -00229 -- •- $50. 00 - --- -05519 • 42660 11/19/92 PERSONNEL /TRAINING $0.00 11/25/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITATION COURT BAIL VENDOR TOTAL $50. 00 00400 -110-300-0000-3302-48836-- -- --- $238. 00 -- -- ----- 11/23/92 /COURT FINES/PARKING ******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY NOTICING AND MISC. CHARGES/NOV 92 ER11B VENDOR TOTAL $238. 00 05164 $0.00 42661 11/25/92 ., ]1 03882 - ---001-400-4101-4201 00174 --------- - $920.00 _. __ _.-- _ ..- 92HER 11 B 01 164 ----- 42662 $0.00 11/25/92 L• 11/30/92 PLANNING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ******************************************************************** $920. 00 - 11 1] R SOUTH BAY UNITY CHURCH-------- 04955 - ---001-210-0000-2110-05151------ - $100.00 --- - -----48309-05446 -----42663 -:- DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 48309 11/19/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 11/25/92 --- *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************----------- -3100.00 _ - _ R - --- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS -CO.- -----00170 --- 001-400-4204-4303 00626- --------- $228:00 GAS BILLINGS/NOV 92 011 0 �- 4254----.-- 11/24/92 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES $0.. 00 11/25/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** ---- $228.00 R -- SOUEEKERS & HERB 03480 001-400-4601-4308 00775 $400.42 SHIRTS/SAND BOWL CLASSIC 1100 11/05/92 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS 1100-05733 ------ 42665--- $0.00 2665-- $0.00 11/25/92 11 14 • • • NIP • • FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 14:49:56 - PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION --.--*** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE '0012 FOR 11/25/92 - -- DATE 11/25/92 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC • PROJ # ACCOUNT -DESCRIPTION•- - AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ----- *400. 42 R SUMITOMO BANK 04751 - 001-400-3104-6900 00110 $855.11 00066 42666 I., LEASE PMT/DEC 92 11/15/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 11/25/92 1„1 I' -- 1-----_ - *** VENDOR TOTAL **************************************************** ************xu*-.—------*855. 11--.- - 1 ti 11 i I� - .. 6,51 R TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION, INC. COMPUTER TUNING/OCT 92 :0926 4 5 to 11 t6 1, 15 -03421 001-400-2101-4201 — 01159 -- - $200.00 RE: 0926 00069 42667 11/09/92 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 11/25/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL-******************************************************************** — *200.00 - *** PAY CODE TOTAL******************************************************************------*79.555.81-_ t j'• t_. '1„1 WARRANTS-******************************************************************-----$89.629.23 1. 39 41 42 L 43 144 47 4R Y, 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PASCS __f__TOd. INCLUSIVE. OF THE V,".1i R.1NT R.:611 4E1i I OR t/ ._.. /AS/Z\..— , t,Cl in 1IE, 1 ()NES PRE AVAII i,'AL ICI; l'Al LI. r.', ,.I,':) "..E lid CO;:I ORLIANCE THE -13:177...1.T. BY __(/ce LI'�.�. ((� FIIJiW is i_ ��X,.tt DA 23 !24 226 21 J 1 J J .1:, 41. 440 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:33.05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INITIAL PREM/HEALTH INS H FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INITIAL PREM/HEALTH INS H FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INITIAL PREM/HEALTH INS H FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INITIAL PREM/HEALTH INS H FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INITIAL PREM/HEALTH INS •*• VENDOR 'TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/03/92 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 04963 001-400-1212-4188 02557 12/01/92 EMP BENEFITS 04963 110-400-3302-4188 01636 12/01/92 PARKING ENF 04963 125-400-8513-4188 00071 12/01/92 CIP 92-513 04963 170-400-2103-4188 00350 12/01/92 SPEC INVESTOTNS 04963 705-400-1217-4188 00718 12/01/92 WORKERS COMP $11,993 36 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $558.31 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $18.99 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $189.90 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $94.95 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS H TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL DEC PREM/C. MC DONALD •** VENDOR TOTAL INV/REF $12,855.51 00240 001-400-1212-4188 02556 $108.97 12/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS •** PAY CODE TOTAL R ADAMSON INDUSTRIES MISC CHARGES/OCT 92 •** VENDOR TOTAL 00138 001-400-2101-4309 6978 10/31/92 POLICE $108.97 $12,964.48 00578 $95.00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R ADVANCE ELEVATOR ELEVATOR MAINT/DEC 92 *** VENDOR TOTAL $95.00 PAGE 0001 DATE 12/03/92 PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 05627 42669 $0.00 12/03/92 05627 42669 $0.00 12/03/92 05627 42669 $0.00 12/03/92 05627 42669 $0.00 12/03/92 05627 42669 $0. 00 12/03/92 05626 42668 $0.00 12/03/92 6978 00103 42674 $0.00 12/03/92 00003 001-400-4204-4201 00551 $90.00 29778 00003 42675 29778 12/01/92 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/03/92 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/DEC 92 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/DEC 92 00935 001-400-2101-4201 01164 64099 11/25/92 POLICE ,00935 001-400-2201-4201 00348 64099 '11/25/92 FIRE $90. 00 $2,361.50 64099 00048 42676 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/03/92 $195.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 64099 00048 42676 $0.00 12/03/92 it 1,1 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 16:33:05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0002 FOR 12/03/92 DATE 12/03/92 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 00935 110-400-3302-4307 00068 •239.50 63987 00058 42676 RADIO MAINT/DEC 92 63987 11/25/92 PARKING ENF /RADIO MAINTENANCE $0.00 12/03/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL $2,796.00 R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00857 001-400-2101-4306 01291 *16.25 7175 00115 42677 PRISONER MEALS/NOV 92 7175 11/30/92 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 12/03/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL $16.25 R ANASTASI CONSTRUCTION 00004 001-210-0000-2110 05153 $100.00 67077 05447 42678 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 67077 11/30/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/03/92 R ANASTASI CONSTRUCTION 00004 001-300-0000-3831 00974 INSPECTION FEE 67077 11/30/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL *25.00CR 67077 05447 42678 /STREET CUT INSPECTION *0.00 12/03/92 *75. 00 R BANC ONE LEASING 99 02154 001-400-4205-6900 00124 *417.96 63-5500566-01 00030 42679 LEASE PAYMENT/DEC 92 66-01 12/01/92 EQUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS *0.00 12/03/92 www VENDOR TOTAL $417.96 R BANK OF AMERICA. NT & SA 04677 001-400-1141-4201 00138 *250.00 03881 42680 SAFEKEEPING FEE/OCT 92 11/16/92 CITY TREASURER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 12/03/92 *we VENDOR TOTAL *250.00 R THE*BLUE ANGELS 04970 001-300-0000-3894 00134 *717.00 05776 42681 COMM RES SKI TRIP 11/30/92 /OTHER RECREATION PROORMS $0.00 12/03/92 R THE*BLUE ANGELS 04970 145-400-3409-4201 00035 *420.00 05775 42681 'SNOW TRIP TRANSPORTATION 11/30/92 REC TRANSPTN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/03/92 ww* VENDOR TOTAL L *1, 137. 00 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 001-400-1212-4188 02563 $66.10 00055 42682 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 12/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *0.00 12/03/92 • J • FINANCE-5FA340 • TIME 16 33 05 CITY OF IIERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/03/92 PAGE 0003 DAZE 12/03/92 PAY VENDOR NAME VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO N CHK N • DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • •++ VENDOR TOTAL • $66.10 ROND FALLLL CLASS 04967 001-400-4601-4221 00101 $252.00 INSTRVCTUR A500 A500 05760 11/25/9242683 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR $0.00 12/03/2/03/ 92 • ••* VCNDOR TOTAL 1 $252 00 R CA STATE ¶JNTV DOMIN(;VFZ HILLS -7002 00412 001-400-1207-4316 00113 •697.00 354--31-7802 04331 42684 TUITION/S. LAWRENCE 12/02/92 BUS LICENSE /TRAINING $0.00 12/03/92 • ••• VENDOR TOTAL • • • 0• • R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH 1N8/DEC 92 R CANADA LTTE 00046 170-400-2103-4188 00353 CITY HEALTH TNS/DEC 91 $96.75 00008 42685 12/0t/9 SPEC 1NVESTGTNS /EMPL.OYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/03/92 * * * $697. 00 • 00046 001-400-1212-4188 02564 $639 55 00008 42685 12/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/03/92 . VFNUt)R TOTAL IT • R JFANNE*CARUSO RF_IMB MATERIALS/FALL 92 03293 001-400-2101-4316 00962 $136 40 11/30/92 06112 42686 POLICE /TRAINING, 40.00 12/03/92 • •$* VENDOR TOTAL $735.30 • • • t a R MONA JF.AN.CEDAR FALL. CLASS 1NSIRUCTOR VUNruf torAI. $136.40 03159 001-400-4601-4221 00104 $122 50 11/30/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR 05759 $O..0 20 12/037 .1 0/03/92 0122 50 R CHAMPTnN CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-2101-4311 01544 MISC CHARGES/NOV 92 11/30/92 $683 15 01113 42608 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE .10.00 12/03/92 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC CHARGES/NOV 92 11/10/92 •11.04 w.* VENruR TOTAL /AUTO MAINTENANCE $694 19 00014 001-400-6101-4311 00293 PARKS 01113 42688 $0.00 12/03/92 R CHEVRON (MIA, INC. 00634 170-400-2103-4310 00081 WESTNET GASOLINE/NOV 92 84419 11/30/92 FUELS 0 14172F14419 01115 242609 /03/ SPEC INVESTGTNS /MOTOR FUELS AND L.I/DES $0.00 12/03/92 4 • • • ;w II VIP i FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16'33:05 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/03/92 PAGE 0004 DATE 12/03/92 PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP . wee VENDOR TOTAL *608.00 R CONT EDUCATION OF THE BAR 04497 001-400-2101-4305 01882 *74.45 553087 06111 42690 PUBLICATIONS/PROSECUTOR 53087 11/30/92 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 12/03/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL $74.45 R COUNTRYSIDE DEVELOPMENT 04969 001-210-0000-2110 05154 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 32884 11/30/92 R COUNTRYSIDE DEVELOPMENT 04969 001-210-0000-2110 05155 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 32893 11/30/92 $1,600.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $1,600.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL $3.200.00 32884 05448 42691 $0.00 12/03/92 32893 05449 42691 *0. 00 12/03/92 R JIM*CUBBERLEV 02971 001-400-4601-4221 00100 $448.00 A500 05734 42692 FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR A500 11/25/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PROR $0.00 12/03/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL $448.00 R JIM*DENNERLINE 04383 001-400-4601-4221 00106 *364.00 05740 42693 FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 11/30/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PROR $0.00 12/03/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL $364.00 R DETROIT EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00995 110-400-3302-4309 00875 $19.75 C0000472 05155 42694 KEYS/LOT F MACHINE 00472 11/16/92 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $19.75 12/03/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL $19.75 R DUNCAN INDUSTRIES 01194 110-400-3302-4309 00876 $629.09 P008352-0 05156 42695 PARKING METER PARTS 352-0 11/17/92 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $632.25 12/03/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL *629. 09 R EASY READER • 00181 109-400-3301-4302 00005 $440.00 1119130/25009 01126 42696 MISC CHARGES/NOV 92 25009 11/25/92 VEH PKC DIST /ADVERTISING *0.00 12/03/92 1 • • • • • • 11, • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:33:05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ••• VENDOR TOTAL R ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY LEASE PAYMENT/DEC 92 ••• VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/03/92 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0005 DATE 12/03/92 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP •440.00 02354 001-400-3103-6900 00119 *1,736.78 4293 12/01/92 ST MAINTENANCE /LEASE PAYMENTS R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/NOV R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/NOV R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/NOV R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/NOV R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/NOV R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/NOV R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/NOV R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/NOV R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/NOV R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/NOV R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/NOV R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/NOV INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 00015 11/30/92 00015 11/30/92 00015 11/30/92 00015 11/30/92 00015 11/30/92 00015 11/30/92 00015 11/30/92 00015 11/30/92 00015 11/30/92 00015 11/30/92 001-400-1101-4304 00517 CITY COUNCIL 001-400-1121-4304 00582 CITY CLERK 001-400-1131-4304 00419 CITY ATTORNEY 001-400-1141-4304 00597 CITY TREASURER 001-400-1201-4304 00647 CITY MANAGER 001-400-1202-4304 00652 FINANCE ADMIN 001-400-1203-4304 00662 PERSONNEL 001-400-1206-4304 00578 DATA PROCESSING 001-400-1207-4304 00455 BUS LICENSE 001-400-1208-4304 00260 GEN APPROP 00015 001-400-2101-4304 11/30/92 POLICE 01145 ,00015 001-400-2201-4304 00503 '11/30/92 FIRE $1,736. 78 *6. 92 /TELEPHONE $20.13 /TELEPHONE *8.70 /TELEPHONE *17. 08 /TELEPHONE $14.75 /TELEPHONE *56. 27 /TELEPHONE 039. 76 /TELEPHONE 077. 33 /TELEPHONE $18.19 /TELEPHONE $8.98 /TELEPHONE 0652. 05 /TELEPHONE 075. 43 /TELEPHONE 4293 00043 42697 *0. 00 12/03/92 01130 42699 *0. 00 12/03/92 01130 42699 *0.00 12/03/92 01130 42699 *0. 00 12/03/92 01130 42699 $0.00 12/03/92 01130 42699 $0.00 12/03/92 01130 42699 *0. 00 12/03/92 01130 42699 *0. 00 12/03/92 01130 42699 $0.00 12/03/92 •. Th 01130 42699 $0.00 12/03/92 01130 42699 00.00 12/03/92 01130 42699 *0. 00 12/03/92 01130 42699 00.00 12/03/92 S. • • • • r FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16 33 05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GTE 1ELE R GTE TELE R GTE TELE R GTE TELE R GTE TELE R GTE TELE R GTE TELE R GTE TELE R GTE TELE R GTE TELE R GTEL R GTEL EQUIPMENT RENTAL/NOV 92 •*• VENDOR TOTAL CALIFORNIA, CHARGES/NOV CALIFORNIA, CHARGES/NOV CALIFORNIA, CHARGES/NOV CALIFORNIA, CHARGES/NOV CALIFORNIA, CHARGES/NOV CALIFORNIA, CHARGES/NOV CALIFORNIA, CHARGES/NOV CALIFORNIA, CHARGES/NOV CALIFORNIA, CHARGES/NOV CALIFORNIA, CHARGES/NOV •#• VENDOR TOTAL INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 INCORPORATED 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/03/92 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00508 $14.40 11/30/92 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00655 $61.19 11/30/92 PLANNING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00585 $97.52 11/30/92 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00710 $239.27 11/30/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE PAGE 0006 DATE 12/03/92 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00015 001-400-4204-4321 00691 $38.69 11/30/92 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00763 $83.22 11/30/92 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00466 $8.70 11/30/92 PARKS /TELEPHONE 00015 109-400-3301-4304 00064 $10.00 11/30/92 VEH PKQ DIST /TELEPHONE 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00669 $160.44 11/30/92 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE 00015 146-400-3401-4304 00005 $4.16 11/30/92 DIAL A RIDE /TELEPHONE REPAIR TELEPHONE/D. P. R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 *1,715.18 01340 001-400-1206-4304 00579 $65.00 76726 11/22/92 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-2101-4304 11/22/92 POLICE 01146 $51.56 /TELEPHONE *116.56 ,02623 001-400-1212-4188 02559 $3,262.61 '12/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01130 42699 *0.00 12/03/92 01130 42699 *0.00 12/03/92 01130 42699 $0.00 12/03/92 01130 42699 $0.00 12/03/92 01130 42699 $0.00 12/03/92 01130 42699 *0.00 12/03/92 01130 42699 $0.00 12/03/92 01130 42699 *0, 00 12/03/92 01130 42699 $0.00 12/03/92 01130 42699 $0.00 12/03/92 BR76726 04036 42700 $0.00 12/03/92 01133 42700 $0.00 12/03/92 00001 $0.00 42701 12/03/92 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16 33.05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 •«• VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/03/92 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02623 105-400-2601-4188 01363 *9.33 12/01/92 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 110-400-3302-4188 01637 $111.95 12/01/92 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 115-400-8141-4188 00041 •6.70 12/01/92 CIP 89-141 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 115-400-8144-4188 00061 $3.35 12/01/92 CIP 90-144 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 115-400-8178-4188 00061 *13.40 12/01/92 CIP 90-178 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 125-400-8513-4188 00072 *3.35 12/01/92 CIP 92-313 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PAGE 0007 DATE 12/03/92 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 02623 160-400-3102-4188 01345 *9.33 12/01/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS . 02623 160-400-8408-4188 00051 *6.70 12/01/92 CIP 89-408 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 170-400-2103-4188 00351 *26.34 12/01/92 SPEC INVESTOTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 705-400-1209-4188 00646 *33.52 12/01/92 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 705-400-1217-4188 00720 $50.28 12/01/92 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R VVONNE*HAMILTON CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 47179 4*• VENDOR TOTAL 04965 001-300-0000-3904 11/24/92 *3,536.86 00468 *100.00 /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS R HARBOR CITY ENTERPRISES, INC. MISC CHARGES/NOV 92 26362 .03571 001-400-2101-4311 11/30/92 POLICE *100. 00 01545 $571.24 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00001 42701 $0.00 12/03/92 00001 42701 *0. 00 12/03/92 00001 42701 $0.00 12/03/92 00001 42701 *0. 00 12/03/92 00001 42701 $0.00 12/03/92 00001 42701 *0. 00 12/03/92 00001 42701 *0.00 12/03/92 00001 42701 *0. 00 12/03/92 00001 42701 $0.00 12/03/92 • • • ,• • ,. • 00001 42701 i.. $0.00 12/03/92 r' 00001 42701 $0.00 12/03/92 47179 03880 42702 $0.00 12/03/92 26362 01134 42703 $0.00 12/03/92 • i • • 'I • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:33:03 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION www VENDOR TOTAL R ANNE*HULEOARD FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR www VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0008 FOR 12/03/92 DATE 12/03/92 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK M DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION $571.24 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 04964 001-400-4601-4221 00107 •454.30 05738 42704 11/30/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLABS/PROR •0.00 12/03/92 $454.30 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-400-4204-4309 02516 $133.15 01137 42705 MISC CHARGES/OCT-NOV 92 11/30/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/03/92 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-400-6101-4309 01343 $27.82 01137 42705 MISC CHARGES/OCT-NOV 92 11/30/92 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/03/92 www VENDOR TOTAL $160.97 R JAMESTOWN PRESS 04908 001-400-1202-4305 00454 $768.03 25679 05611 42706 ACCTS PAYABLE WARRANTS 25679 11/06/92 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $698.21 12/03/92 www VENDOR TOTAL $768.03 R ALAN*KAN 03376 001-400-4601-4221 00105 $147.00 05736 42707 FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 11/30/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PROR $0.00 12/03/92 www VENDOR TOTAL $147.00 R LIEBERT. CASSIDY & FRIERSON 02175 001-400-1203-4201 00987 $1,006.25 05523 42708 LEGAL SERVICE/OCT 92 11/24/92 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/03/92 www VENDOR TOTAL $1.006.25 R LOS ANGELES DODGERS, INC. 00080 001-400-4601-4201 01612 $323.00 05772 42709 TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP 11/30/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/03/92 www VENDOR TOTAL $323.00 R MANHATTAN FORD ,00605 001-400-3104-4311 00109 $95.26 MISC CHARGES/NOV 92 11/30/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /AUTO MAINTENANCE 01146 $0.00 42710 12/03/92 'I i • • • 0 • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16 33:05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R MANHATTAN FORD MISC CHARGES/NOV 92 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/03/92 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00605 170-400-2103-4311 00076 $183 03 11/30/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /AUTO MAINTENANCE R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. DIESEL FUEL/CITY YARD 20796 R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. REGULAR FUEL/CITY YARD 20796 R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. UNLEADED FUEL/CITY YARD 20796 *** VENDOR TOTAL 03080 001-141-0000-1401 11/09/92 03080 001-141-0000-1401 11/09/92 03080 001-141-0060-1401 11/09/92 PAGE 0009 DATE 12/03/92 INV/REF PO * CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP •278 29 00197 $941.44 /GASOLINE INVENTORY 00198 $1,375.13 /GASOLINE INVENTORY 00199 S3,075. 13 /GASOLINE INVENTORY R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION MISC CHARGES/OCT 92 784K2 *** VENDOR TOTAL $5,391.70 920796 920796 920796 01146 $0.00 42710 12/03/92 05299 •42711 $0.00 12/03/92 05298 42711 $0.00 12/03/92 05297 42711 $0.00 12/03/92 00388 170-400-2103-4310 00082 $19.81 930784K2 01150 42712 11/09/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES $0.00 12/03/92 R MONARCH BROOM MISC CHARGES/NOV 92 0.** VENDOR TOTAL $19.81 00084 001-400-3103-4309 01445 $1.093.34 9024/9029/9030 01149 /9030 11/30/92 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 R MYERS STEVENS & COMPANY CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 *0* VENDOR TOTAL $1.093.34 00091 001-400-1212-4188 02562 $772.20 12/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R NATIONAL HOME LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 *** VENDOR TOTAL $772.20 03465 001-400-1212-4188 02561 $80.00 12/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R PACTEL CELLULAR - LA MOBILE PHONE CHCS/NOV 92 *80. 00 .03209 170-400-2103-4304 00069 $845.57 11/30/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /TELEPHONE 00013 $0.00 42713 12/03/92 42714 12/03/92 00065 42715 $0.00 12/03/92 01153 30.00 42716 12/03/92 I' I i j W. • • VP • • • .1Jw • FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 16:33:05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/03/92 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R PAGENET PAGING SERV/DEC 92 R PAGENET PAGING SERV/DEC 92 R PAGENET PAGING SERV/DEC 92 R PAGENET PAGING SERV/DEC 92 R PAGENET PAGING SERV/DEC 92 R PAGENET PAGING SERV/DEC 92 *** VENDOR TOTAL 02487 001-400-1201-4201 00155 12/01/92 CITY MANAGER 02487 001-400-1203-4201 00986 12/01/92 PERSONNEL 02487 001-400-2101-4201 01163 12/01/92 POLICE 02487 001--400-2401-4201 00363 12/01/92 ANIMAL CONTROL 02487 001-400-4202-4201 00392 12/01/92 PUB WKS ADMIN 02487 001-400-4601-4201 01613 12/01/92 COMM RESOURCES INV/REF $845.57 $11 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $11.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *199.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT •11.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *110.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *22.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R PEP BOYS MISC CHARGES/NOV 92 *** VENDOR TOTAL *364. 00 00608 170-400-2103-4311 00078 $83.26 70466 11/30/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /AUTO MAINTENANCE R PHOENIX GROUP OUT—OF—STATE CITES/OCT92 58-00 *** VENDOR TOTAL *83.26 PO AMOUNT VNENC PAGE 0010 DATE 12/03/92 N CHK * DATE EXP 00049 42717 •0.00 12/03/92 00049 42717 *0. 00 12/03/92 00049 42717 *0. 00 12/03/92 00049 42717 *0. 00 12/03/92 00049 42717 *0.00 12/03/92 00049 42717 $0.00 12/03/92 070466 01156 42718 $0.00 12/03/92 02530 110-400-3302-4201 00372 *1,453.76 6258-00 00063 11/19/92 PARKING ENF /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 R PROF COMMUNICATIONS INSTALLERS MISC CHARGES/NOV 92 5/916 *** VENDOR TOTAL $1,453.76 02526 170-400-21,03-4311 00077 *675 00 917/915/916 01157 11/30/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /AUTO MAINTENANCE R SYLVIA*ROOT SEC SERV/11-17-92 • *675. 00 .04061 001-400-4102-4201 00384 *263.75 1117 11/24/92 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 1117 05809 $0. 00 42719 12/03/92 42720 12/03/92 42721 12/03/92 der FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:33:05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL R BETSY*RUBINO FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR *0* VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0011 FOR 12/03/92 DATE 12/03/92 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $263. 75 04966 001-400-4601-4221 00103 $277 20 11/30/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PROR $277. 20 04398 001-400-1212-4188 02560 *891.91 12/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 105-400-2601-4188 01364 $63.68 12/01/92 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 109-400-3301-4188 00336 $5.79 12/01/92 VEH PKO DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 110-400-3302-4188 01638 $172.61 12/01/92 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 113-400-8141-4188 00042 $0.54 12/01/92 CIP 89-141 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 115-400-8144-4188 00062 $2. 18 12/01/92 CIP 90-144 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 115-400-8178-4188 00062 $4.34 12/01/92 CIP 90-178 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 125-400-8513-4188 00073 $2.07 12/01/92 CIP 92-513 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 155-400-2102-4188 00863 $4.70 12/01/92 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 160-400-3102-4188 01346 $48.61 12/01/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 160-400-8408-4188 00052 $0.54 12/01/92 CIP 89-408 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04398 170-400-2103-4188 00352 $62.88 12/01/92 SPEC INVESTOTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 05758 42722 $0. 00 12/03/92 00019 42723 $0. 00 12/03/92 00019 42723 $0.00 12/03/92 00019 42723 $0.00 12/03/92 00019 42723 $0.00 12/03/92 00019 42723 $0.00 12/03/92 I ,, 00019 42723 $0.00 12/03/92 !" 00019 42723 $0.00 12/03/92 00019 42723 $0.00 12/03/92 00019 42723 $0.00 12/03/92 00019 42723 $0.00 12/03/92 00019 42723 $0.00 12/03/92 00019 42723 $0.00 12/03/92 • lb • qb V V I, • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16.33:05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION www VENDOR TOTAL R SHORELINE PRINTING INSP/CORR FORMS www VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/03/92 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0012 DATE 12/03/92 INV/REF PO N CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *1,259.85 03505 001-400-4201-4305 00815 •162.38 9903 11/23/92 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHARGES/OCT 92 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHARGES/OCT 92 www VENDOR TOTAL *162. 38 00018 001-400-3103-4309 01444 *15.50 08224 10/31/92 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00018 001-400-3104-4309 00989 *15.50 08224 10/31/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ST LITE BILLS/SEP-OCT 92 www. VENDOR TOTAL $31. 00 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00403 *25,551.90 10/31/92 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. OAS BILLINGS/NOV 92 www VENDOR TOTAL *25,551.90 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00629 *128.65 11/30/92 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES R STATE OF CALIFORNIA FINGERPRINT APPS/SEP 92 13844 www VENDOR TOTAL 00364 001-400-2101-4251 11/20/92 POLICE 11128. 65 00464 $135.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT R TECHCRAFT COUNCIL PA SYS REPAIR www VENDOR TOTAL $ 135.00 04949 001-400-1205-4309 00012 *165.57 H0698 10/20/92 CABLE TV /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 *165. 57 00240 001-400-1212-4188 02558 5238.03 12/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 9903 04263 42724 •162.38 12/03/92 008224 01065 42725 *0. 00 12/03/92 008224 01065 42725 *0.00 12/03/92 00012 42726 *0.00 12/03/92 01167 42727 *0.00 12/03/92 913844 00023 42728 $0.00 12/03/92 H0698 05285 42729 *165.57 12/03/92 00029 42730 $0.00 12/03/92 t'I • • • • a • • • I, 40. • •J 40 FINANCE-9FA340 TIME 16 33 05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R "TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/03/92 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00240 105-400-2601-4188 01362 12/01/92 STREET LIGHTING 00240 160-400-3102-4188 01344 12/01/92 i SEWER/ST DRAIN 00240 705-400-1209-4188 00645 12/01/92 LIABILITY INS 00240 705-400-1217-4188 00719 12/01/92 WORKERS COMP $10.90 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $21.79 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *5. 08 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *5.08 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R UNION METAL CORPORATION FLASHING SIGNAL POLES 03598 *** VENDOR TOTAL PAGE 0013 DATE 12/03/92 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $280. 88 00029 42730 $0.00 12/03/92 00029 42730 $0.00 12/03/92 00029 42730 *0. 00 12/03/92 00029 42730 $0.00 12/03/92 00405 115-400-8152-5499 00009 *3,196.42 504159/503598 05208 42731 10/06/92 CIP 92-152 /NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS *3,219.36 12/03/92 R UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE CITATION NOTICE POSTAGE T-460 *** VENDOR TOTAL $3, 196. 42 00740 110-400-3302-4305 00937 $2,000.00 PERMIT -460 05165 42732 11/30/92 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 12/03/92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY'HEALTH INS/DEC 92 03790 001-400-1212-4188 02565 12/01/92 EMP BENEFITS *2,000.00 $2, 167. 21 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 105-400-2601-4188 01365 $83.00 12/01/92 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 109-400-3301-4188 00337 *9.00 12/01/92 VEH PKO DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 110-400-3302-4188 01639 $350.07 12/01/92 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 115-400-8141-4188 00043 *4.50 12/01/92 CIP 89-141 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .03790 115-400-8144-4188 00063 *7.11 12/01/92 CIP 90-144 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00022 42733 $0.00 12/03/92 00022 42733 $0.00 12/03/92 00022 42733 $0.00 12/03/92 00022 42733 $0.00 12/03/92 00022 42733 $0.00 12/03/92 00022 42733 $0. 00 12/03/92 • • • • • • • • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16 33.05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 ••• VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/03/92 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 03790 115-400-8178-4188 00063 $17.21 12/01/92 CIP 90-178 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 125-400-8513-4188 00074 12/01/92 CIP 92-513 03790 155-400-2102-4188 00864 12/01/92 CROSSING GUARD PAGE 0014 DATE 12/03/92 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00022 42733 $0.00 12/03/92 $4.96 00022 42733 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/03/92 $6.00 00022 42733 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/03/92 03790 160-400-3102-4188 01347 $79.78 12/01/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 160-400-8408-4188 00053 $4.50 12/01/92 CIP 89-408 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 705-400-1209-4188 00647 $18.75 12/01/92 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 705-400-1217-4188 00721 $24.42 12/01/92 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R MARY•VANDERDUR-•MANN FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR ••• VENDOR TOTAL ••• PAY CODE TOTAL ••• TOTAL WARRANTS $2. 776. 51 04968 001-400-4601-4221 00102 $357.00 11/30/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR $357.00 $71.643.20 $84.607.68 00022 42733 $0.00 12/03/92 00022 42733 $0.00 12/03/92 00022 42733 $0.00 12/03/92 00022 42733 $0.00 12/03/92 05757 42734 $0.00 12/03/92 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGESTO __L INCLUSIVE, OF THE WARRANT REGISTER FOR _. _. /9 i,/ . _. ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYP.1! III Atli, ARI 111 l;ONFURMANCE 10 THE UDGE1. BY _ FINANCI. DI CIUR DATE-i_a/,4. - -- T W 4.0 I. dP b- FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:17:06 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT------ PAYROLL/11-16 TO 11-30 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/11-16 TO 11-30 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL' ACCOUNT-'.-- PAYROLL/11-16 TO 11-30 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/11-16 TO 11-30 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL -ACCOUNT- ----00243 - PAYROLL/11-16 TO 11-30 12/02/92 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/11-16 TO 11-30 12/02/92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/10/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT -DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00243-- --- - 001-202-00002030--- 00519--- $246,-561: 60 12/02/92 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00243 105-202-0000-2030 12/02/92 -00293 $9,952.38 - /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00243 --109-2020000=2030--- 12/02/92 00243 110-202-0000-2030 12/02/92 115-202-0000=2030- 00243 15-202-0000=2030- 00243 125-202-0000-2030 00092----$1-558.52 - /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00297- ._ " $41, 351: 19 /ACCRUED PAYROLL --- /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00017 - - $652.85 /ACCRUED PAYROLL H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL -ACCOUNT -----00243--"145=202=0000=2030'--00289 PAYROLL/11-16 TO 11-30 12/02/92 H " HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/11-16 TO 11-30 H-----HERMOSA-BEACH PAYROLL"ACCOUN PAYROLL/11-16 TO 11-30 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/11-16 TO 11-30 'HERMOSA BEACH -PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/11-16 TO 11-30 00243 -- 146=202-0000-2030-- 12/02/92 146=202-0000-2030-_. 12/02/92 --00243-------150 12/02/92 /ACCRUED PAYROLL -00014 $1;953:40 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 202=0000-2030---00017---------$194718 - 00243 155-202-0000-2030 00290 12/02/92 00243 - "I60=202=0000=2036-028/ 12/02/92 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 H- PAYROLL/11-16 TO 11-30 -HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUN PAYROLL/11-16 TO 11-30 12/02/92 PAGE 0001 DATE 12/10/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # a► • 3 • AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP —s 610 $0. 00 $0. 00 42670 --" 12/10/92 ';:4110 42670 + 12/10/92 41k 42670 i5 $0.00 12/10/92 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 42670---- 12/10/92 42670-- 12/10/92 42670..._ 12/10/92 42670 12/10/92 42670---- $0.00 2670___.__.$0.00 12/10/92 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $4,836.50 ._. /ACCRUED PAYROLL 170-202-0000-2030 00144-- $10, 949-71 42670 'y • nn ..H 40 $0.00 12/10/92 $0. 00 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $26;218.16 _._. /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00243 --705-202-0000-2036--00251 $5,895-80 12/02/92 /ACCRUED PAYROLL *** VENDOR TOTAL*******4******4*4**44**************4 ***************4********4*******__..___$355,039.49 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT -SYS: D01 -400=1213-41E40 00026 001-400=1213-4180 00632 $96,261 8 RETIREMENT ADV/NOV 92 12/09/92 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT -42670-- 12/10/92 ---42670_._...._.12/10/92 4, 42 <4 4., 4267U $0.00 12/10/92 -42670---- $0.00 42670---- $0.00 12/ 10/92 $Q. 00 42670 12/10/92 • 42735---- $0.00 12/10/92 5o 54 56 57 1,v Gr. ,2 y 9 S 3 3 3 J to tio ,• 4, 1 d • i R AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES -INC." i;.I PROG PMT/TRAFFIC PROGRAM 6699 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17: 17: 06 — _ FAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/10792 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT -' DATE'INVC-" PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL#######*#*###*##*######*#########*###########*##########44######*##'# PAGE 0002 DATE 12/I079d INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP--- $96,261.78 XP'""-.. $96,261.78 * * PAY CODE TOTAL***********n************************************************t****#_ __ $451,301.27 R A"& E TROPHIES MISC. CHARGES FOR DEC 92 11341 02744- 001=400-1101-4319 — 00141 — —$22.-42 12/02/92 CITY COUNCIL /SPECIAL EVENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL************************#*#*****#********************************** $22.42 *** -ALTEC-INDUSTRIES ANN INSP/CHERRY PICKER 17619 11341 00122 42738 $0.00 12/10/92 04971 105-400=2601-4311 00296 $1,0567b7 17619 05281 .11/30/92 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE $1,100.00 VENDOR TOTAL**************************4*********************************4******# _..—..__$1,05667- ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL.- UTILITY RAG RENT NOV 92 96001 R ARATEX/RED STAR -INDUSTRIAL UTILITY RAG RENT NOV 92 96001 - R -ARATEX /RED - STAR - -INDUSTRIAL —00152--- 11/27/92 00152 11/27/92 UTILITY RAG RENT NOV 92 96001 R- ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL UTILITY RAG RENT NOV 92 96001 R ARATE X/RED-STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 11/27/92 00152 11/27/92 UTILITY RAG RENT NOV 92 96001 001=400-2201-4309 01406 FIRE 001-400-3104-4309 - 00991 TRAFFIC SAFETY -001=400=4204=4309--02519 BLDG MAINT 001-400-4205-4309 00695 EQUIP SERVICE 0015d 11/27/92 1[0-400=3302-4309 -0013/Y PARKING ENF 427-4V 12/10/92 $59740— 900096001-00017---"4274 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/10/92 $54720 -- 900096001 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -00017 _.. __ 42740 $0.00 12/10/92 -$223704 900096001"-00017 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 42740 12/10/92 $62.60- 900096001 00017 -- 42740 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/10/92 36 4T e zo 2, zz e 23 25 26 e 229 29 ane 3, 32 33 33 35 36 3, 3r e s io 33 Y000960UI—D06I7— 4274 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/10/92 ***VENDOR-TOTAL***********#******************************************************** JULIE_LT*ARCAND FALL CLASS REFUND 47722 $409-74 48 9 50 5, 52 04983 -001=300=0000=3873---00744 $YU.UU 41122 05766 4274 12/03/92 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 12/10/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************************it******* $90. 00 -04973 150=400=8151=4201-- 00003 317TI5 00- 11/04/92 CIP 89-151 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 6699--06008- $0.00 56 9 63 42742 12/10/92 e e e ,1 ,2 5 ,5 y • 0 .�s N FINANCE-5FA340 TIME 17:17:06 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF EIERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/10/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT -DATE INVC PROS* -ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************************************it R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHARGES FOR NOV. 92 R AVIATION LOCK & KEY-- MISC EY--"MISC CHARGES FOR NOV. 92 R AVIATION LOCK & KEY MISC CHARGES FOR NOV. 92 00407 001-400-2101-4306 01295 11/28/92 POLICE 00407 ----001,-4004204-4321----00693 11/28/92 BLDG MAINT 00407 - 001-400-6101-4309 -- 01345 11/28/92 PARKS PAGE 0003 DATE 12/10/9 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1-115..-00 --$24.36 -$24.36 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE -$24. 89_ -- /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT $37.87' /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS -- AVIATION LOCK & KEY ----------------00407 -360-400-3102-4309 00749-- $2771 -" MISC CHARGES FOR NOV. 92 11/28/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************************************#__________.___$89.83 BANC ONE LEAS INO- CORPORATION MOBILE DATA LEASE PAY#3 24-01 03422 11/24/92 00117 $0. 00 i► 42743 12/10/92 4 • IS 16 00117 --- 42743 $0.00 12/10/92 00117 $0. 00 42743 12/10/92 00117 42743 $0.00 12/10/92 001=400-2101-6900 0&0D--- T-0 721 T 44 87=2222024=Di -00062 POLICE /LEASE PAYMENTS *4* VENDOR TOTAL*************************T►****************************************** *4* *4* ----BEACH-CITIES-STATIONERS DISCOUNT OFFERED 6257 R ..- BEACH CITIES STATIONERS DISCOUNT TAKEN BEACH- CITIES -STATIONERS NAMEPLATES/CABLE TV 01631 001:-:-202-0000=2021----0031-9- 12/03/92 $10,720744 $1.98 DISCOUNTS OFFERED ._- 01631 -----001-202-0000=2022 00313 $1.98CR 6257 12/03/92 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN -01631---001=400=1205=4305-00136 6257 12/03/92 CABLE TV VENDOR TOTAL **************************************** BPI -MEDICAL -WASTE -SYSTEMS PD MEDICAL WASTE -OCT 92 41723 VENDOR $1767-80 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *************************** ._- _ $96:-80 04540 —001=400=2301=4201 0!T67 11/30/92 POLICE $0. 00 4274 12/10/92 • i9 20 21 ..1 v • 25 2, ie 31 32 6257-05777 $0. 00 S 36 42745 12/10/92 6257-05777-- 42745-- $0.00 2745 _. -- $0. 00 12/10/92 6257--05/// $41.40---0/2r1-00-0-04172,3 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT TOTAL********************************?*******a***********+r*±r************* $41:40 R BRAUN LINEN SERVICE ---� MISC CHARGES FOR NOV 92 70664 00163 -001-400-=21-01=4306---01-273 $213790 $0. 00 4274 12/10/92 1 43 M16 • • 56 00075 4274 $0.00 12/10/92 11/30/92 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 070664 01116-- 42747-- $0.00 12/10/92 '31 • 6F 6; • 7.1 • • • • • r; tS' .�1,' FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:17:06 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0004 FOR 12110/92 DATE -12/10/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO it CHK 4 DATE INVC PROD' i#'"" - ACCOUNT-DESCRIPTIOIJ *** VENDOR TOTAL **************-************44444******************** ***** *45*-****** $213:90 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP Vy R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00155 001-400-1208-4201 00945 $610.13 921100-2416006 00005 42748 1• TRASH PICKUP FOR DEC. 92 16006 12/01/92 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/10/92 R BROWNING-& FERRIS INDUSTRIES- - - '00155 - "" 109=400=3301-4201-00160 - -$203761 -921100-2416006 00005 - 42748 TRASH PICKUP FOR DEC. 92 16006 12/01/92 VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/10/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************************************************#._-.___.._.$813."74 R-` `--BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00158 001-400-3103=4201 00436 $2T94-3727 921100=0037002 D0004 -' 42749 20 1.3 24 0 DUMP CHARGES FOR NOV. 92 37002 11/30/92 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/10/92 • • *** VENDOR TOTAL**********444******************************************************* $2,943.27 ------GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER-._-- 02016----001400=1202-4305--00456 $0775 PETTY CASH/11-20 TO 12-3 12/07/92 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 03882 42750 $0.00 12/10/92 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-1203-4201 00990 $11:10 03882 42750-"' S PETTY CASH/11-20 TO 12-3 12/07/92 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/10/92 0 0 • •',i R ..."_.- -GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY -TREASURER ------02016 ----001400-':12034305 --'00357 $14T-61- 03882- "-" -42750 PETTY CASH/11-20 TO 12-3 12/07/92 PERSONNEL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 12/10/92 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016-- 001-400-1207-4316 001:15_.__-_ $20.'00 03882- 42750"' - PETTY CASH/11-20 TO 12-3 12/07/92 BUS LICENSE /TRAINING $0.00 12/10/92 R -_L- GARY*BRUTSCH, C ITY -TREASURER PETTY CASH/11-20 TO 12-3 02016- 12/07/92 U01-400=2101=4305 0181:16 $43-i5 03882 4275 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 12/10/92 41040 2 I. 43 sa 47 48 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER -------02016 001-400-2101-4305--01887 52 $19. 49 03882- ----- 42750- 5 PETTY CASH/11-20 TO 12-3 12/07/92 210004 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 12/10/92 -R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER --- "02016 --001-400-2101-4316-00966 PETTY CASH/11-20 TO 12-3 12/07/92 POLICE /TRAINING UU 03882 -427 $0.00 12/10/92 • GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER -02016-- --001-400-2101-4317---00201--" -$32.00 03882 -" 42750 -- PETTY CASH/11-20 TO 12-3 12/07/92 POLICE /CONFERENCE EXPENSE ,$0.00 12/10/92 --GARY*BRUTSCH,-CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/11-20 TO 12-3 • 55 56 •-0 9 43 02016 -001=400=2201=4304"-61405 547.87 03882 - 42750 ., 12/07/92 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/10/92 ti G7 74 72 1 14 m 3 ,S 0 0 'i • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:17:06 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/11-20 TO 12-3 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/11-20 TO 12-3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/10792- PAGE 0005 DATE 12710%92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ #' " ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 02016 " - 001-400=4204-4309 - 02518- -411:-85 12/07/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 02016 705-400-1209-4305 00079 $14.62 12/07/92 LIABILITY INS /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** -- $268.44 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN -- CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 00238 - 001-400-1212-4188 02578 $855.96 12/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00238 105-400-2601-4188 01371 $29.40 12/01/92 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00238 109-400-3301-4188 00341 $2.52 12/01/92 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS --00238 110-400=3302-4188 01645 -$120A2 12/01/92 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN • 00238 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 12/01/92 --TCA--PSYCHOLOGICAL-HEALTH-PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 115-400-8141-4188 00047 $1:26 CIP 89-141 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00238-- ._.-115--400-8144=4188 00068 $2710 12/01/92 CIP 90-144 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 12/01/92 115-400-8178-4188 00068 $5.04 CIP 90-178 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS R--4---CA-PSYCHOLOGICAL-HEALTH-PLAN--- -00238 -LSA-PSYCHOLOGICAL-HEALTH--PLAN --`-00238 "- ---125.40(8513:-:41-88--00080 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 12/01/92 CIP 92-513 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 12/01/92 R -----CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN ------00238 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 12/01/92 CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 155-400-2102-4188 00868 CROSSING GUARD -160-400-3102-4188 01353 SEWER/ST DRAIN 00238 160-400-8408-4188 00058 12/01/92 CIP 89-408 CA -PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAT - 00238 - -705-400-1209-4188 --00652 • CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 12/01/92 LIABILITY INS $i- 68- /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1.68 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $22.68 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0 N 2 6 6 03882 ' - -- 42750' $0.00 12/10/92 03882 42750 $0.00 12/10/92 00041 42751 20 $0.00 12/10/92 00041 42751 $0.00 12/10/92 00041 42751 --- $0.00 00 12/ 10/92 00041- 42751 $0.00 12/10/92 00041 42751 --- $0.00 --_ $0.00 12/10/92 00041 42751 21 24 2.5 2(. ,3 16 4c $0.00 12/10/92 42 43 •:4 00041 42751 $0.00 12/10/92 46 00041 42751 $0.00 12/10/92 00041' '-- $0. 00 -42751-- 12/10/92 - 42751-.. --_--. 12/10/92 00041- 4275I $0.00 12/10/92 • ----- $1.26 00041 -- /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .$0.00 $4.20 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -42751- 12/10492 00041----4275I---- $0.00 0041.--'---4275L--"$0.00 12/10/92 •:2 a • • • • • • • • „ • '2 , • • I� 10 • 121 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:17:06 FAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST -FOR 12/10/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE-INVC PROJ # -.ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION--- - R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN' -.----00238----705-400-1217=4188--0072/ CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 12/01/92 WORKERS COMP $6.30 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************n***************** R JEANNE*CARUSO-"--"--"----" REIMB SUPP/PD CLASS R JEANNE*CARUSO "-" REG/WISNIEWSKI/CAUSE PAGE 0006 DATE 12710/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1,054.20 00041 - 42751 $0. 00 12/10/92 -. 001-400-21014305 OI888^- - —$56: 29 - -- 05901 12/02/92 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 03293 • 001-400-2101-4316 00965 $44.00 12/08/92 POLICE /TRAINING *+r* VENDOR TOTAL-****************Tr**********************************4**************** CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC CHARGES FOR NOV 92 /0313 $100-29 00014 001-400-2101-4311 01548 $118.-64 2501/0313 11/30/92 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR CKG ACCT INTEREST COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR LIAR CLAIMS/NOV 92 R `.. -COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR LIAB CLAIMS/NOV 92 $13-8. 64 -._----04928 -705-300-0000-3401 00063 $4.-61CR 12/07/92 /INTEREST INCOME 42752 131 14 • 15 16 12/10/92 17 'a 19 20 04599 -- 42752 $0.00 12/10/92 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 01113 42753 $0.00 12/10/92 29 3l. • 31 32 04928-'----705-400-1209-4201-----00341-- $18;-748750 12/07/92 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 04928 705-400-1209-4324 00360 $4;017.-37 12/07/92 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS VENDOR -TOTAL --*##********#**-W ** *** **I{*#****# iF4&*iF****4*#4**-tF#*****##*# rlt** R - - COM SYSTEMS; ---INC LONG DISTANCE CHG NOV 92 36040 :ry R R COM SYSTEMS -INC LONG DISTANCE CHG NOV 92 36040 --- COM SYSTEMS; INC LONG DISTANCE CHG NOV 92 36040 COM -SYSTEMS,, INC 00017- 11/30/92 001-400-1101-4304 00519 CITY COUNCIL 00017 001=400-1121-4304 -00554 11/30/92 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE 05524 42754' $0. 00 12/10/92 05524 42754 $0.00 12/10/92 33 • 35 36 37 38 • 40 az• 05524 42754 -.1 $0.00 12/10/92 "w $22, /61. 26 $1.-09 100036040- 01117 -- '42756' /TELEPHONE $0.00 12/10/92 $7724 00017 11/30/92 LONG DISTANCE CHG NOV 92 36040 001-400-1131-4304 -00421 100036040--01-117 $0. 87 100036040" CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 00017 001=400=11-41=4304 00599 $12.// 11/30/92 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE $0.00 42756 12/10/92 01117 - 42756 $0.00 12/10/92 100036040-01117 $0. 00 '50 • 52 55 9 '43 GI 64 -42756- 12/10/92 • • I. a r I= 4 , 111 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:17:06 FAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R R R R R R CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/10/92 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION COM SYSTEMS, INC -' -00017 LONG DISTANCE CHG NOV 92 36040 11/30/92 COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE CHG NOV 92 36040 COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE CHG NOV 92 00017 11/30/92 001-400-1201-4304 00649 CITY MANAGER 001-400-1202-4304 00654 FINANCE ADMIN " 00017 " " 001-400-1203-4304 00664 36040 11/30/92 PERSONNEL COM SYSTEMS, INC - 00017 LONG DISTANCE CHG NOV 92 36040 11/30/92 COM SYSTEMS, --INC LONG DISTANCE CHG NOV 92 36040 COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE CHG NOV 92 36040 SYSTEMS -INC LONG DISTANCE CNG NOV 92 36040 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE CHG NOV 92 36040 COM SYSTEMS, INC - LONG DISTANCE CHG NOV 92 36040 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE CHG NOV 92 36040 -R - -COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE CHG NOV 92 36040 $24-57 /TELEPHONE $22. 76 /TELEPHONE PAGE 0007 DATE 12/10/92 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 100036040 01117 -- ---- 42756- $0. 00 12/10/92 100036040 01117 42756 $0.00 12/10/92 $26163 - -"100036040 01117 /TELEPHONE $0. 00 001-400-1206-4304 00582 - $16.98 - 100036040 01117 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE $0.00 00017 -001-400-1207-4304 ._ 00457" ---'--$138' ----100036040 "" 01117 11/30/92 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE $0.00 00017 11/30/92 001-400-2101-4304 01149 POLICE D0017- 001-400-4f-01-4304 00657 11/30/92 PLANNING 00017 001-400-4202-4304 00712 11/30/92 PUB WKS ADMIN 00017 ---001-400=4601-4304 00765 11/30/92 COMM RESOURCES 00017 11/30/92 _- $268:85-- /TELEPHONE 268:85 --- /TELEPHONE 42756 12/10/92 42756 - 12/10/92 42756 12/10/92 -100036040 01117 - 42756 $0.00 12/10/92 -100036040 01117 /TELEPHONE $0.00 $36.81 /TELEPHONE $22:-53 /TELEPHONE 105-400-2601-4304 00218 . $13:75 STREET LIGHTING /TELEPHONE 00017"- —110=400-3302-4304 00671— $66734 11/30/92 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE 100036040 01117 14, ,6 n 18 9 20 21 24 21/ :0 '.7 42756 12/10/92 .$0.00 12/10/92 100036040 01117 _.42756- $0.00 2756$0.00 12/10/92 100036040_. 01117 - $0. 00 *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************4**************************************--x_______...___$576.86 R ----COOPERS & LYBRAND PROGRESS PMT/FY 91-92 ** VENDOR TOTAL 42756--- 12/10/92 2756.._.._12/10/92 100036040-01117 - 42756- $0.00 12/10/92 03498 -001=400=1202-4201- 00340 $57934-00 1726=000871-05624- 00871 11/17/92 FINANCE ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 ****************#******#**************************** ******44***** $81934:00 - CSFM BOOKSTORE PUBLICATIONS/FIRE DEPT 159 427bI 12/10/92 04958 -- -- 001=400=2201-4305-- 00586 $9700 159- 03474-" -42758 11/30/92 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $9.00 12/10/92 • • • w ,b FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:17:06 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12710792 PAGE 0008 DATE 12T10/9 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE"INVC- PROJ # ACCOUNT -DESCRIPTION - """ "' AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *4* VENDOR TOTAL-***********************************************************#*****ww* R DANIEL FREEMAN LAX MED. CLINIC 0 EMP PHYSICAL/NOV 92 71-00 • ..I • 11. $9.06 -02390 ---- 001-400-1203-4320 00437 $54.00_.- _. 004971-00 05526 12/01/92 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS *** VENDOR TOTAL*******•n************************************************************— R THE *DEVELOPMENT MISC CHARGES/NOV 92 $54. 00 $0.00 42759-- 12/10/92 2759-- 12/10/92 00147 --- --001-400-2101-4306 01294- '"' -- $49.85 1015 01120- -42760 alp rJ 20 1015 11/30/92 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 12/10/92 **#_ VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION __-..._.. 00269 COMPUTER MAINT FOR DEC92 44993 12/04/92 $49. 85 23 24 001-400-2101-4201 01168 - -'$913-32 - 341344993 00007 42761 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/10/92 --R --DIGITAL EQUIPMENT -CORPORATION- 00269 001=400=2201=4201-00350 COMPUTER MAINT FOR DEC92 44993 12/04/92 FIRE *** VENDOR TOTAL*******•it*******************4*********.*********at*** - R_-_-_-' -EASTMAN; -INC. MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES/NOV 25 26 22 28 2 31 2 $608.87---- 341344993-00007 -2761 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/10/92 ***************** --$1, 522. 19 02514 -001=400=1208-4305-01154 $258794 11/30/92 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL.******************************************************************** $258.94 - R EASY -READER PUBLIC NOTICES/NOV 92 001SF 001-400=112-1=4323 —00210 $4337-64 33 34 5 36 01124 "42762 $0.00 12/10/92 37 36 39 40 41 42 44 45 47 48 11/30/92 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING --- *** VENDOR-TOTAL********************************************************************___-.___$433-63 a• 7-------- -----EDDINGS-BROTHERS AUTO PARTS -00165-- 001-202-0006=2021 00320 *',I DISCOUNT OFFERED 13857 12/01/92 DISCOUNTS OFFERED LI iI` R 01126 42/ $0. 00 12/10/92 $107-69 213857--06002 R.... EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS DISCOUNT OFFERED 00165 ". 001-202-0000-2022 -00314- $54.92 11/30/92 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS- -00165 "001-202=0000=2022-00315 DISCOUNT TAKEN 11/30/92 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 42765 $0. 00 12/10/92 • 01127 "-. 42765 $0. 00 12/10/92 $54 92CR 01127- — "42765 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 50 52 5-3 ip 14 fra N wl• $0.00 12/10/92 66 6�'• ,0 • • a 4 A 4 4 1 4 4 r 4 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:17:06 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS - -- DISCOUNT TAKEN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/10/92 PAGE 0009 DATE 12/10/9 VND $t ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN iF AMOUNT INV/REF PO ii CHK * DATE INVC- PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00165 --- -001-202-0000-2022-00316- $ 10. 69CR - -' ' --213857 06002 13857 12/01/92 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 P. EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES FOR 00165 11/30/92 001-400-2101-4311 _- 01550 $744.25 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-2201-4311- -00453 11/30/92 FIRE 00165 11/30/92 00165 11/30/92 00165 11/30/92 $61. 57 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 001-400-2401-4311 00289 $7.63 ANIMAL CONTROL /AUTO MAINTENANCE 001-400=3103-4311--__ 00828 ' $295.56 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 001-400-3104-4311 _ - 00111 $74:08 TRAFFIC SAFETY /AUTO MAINTENANCE -00165 001=400=4201=4311— 00323----219. 56 11/30/92 BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-4205-4309 00684 $635.33 NOV 92 11/30/92 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R - EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 • EDDINGS-DRO•THERS-AUTD PARTS TOOL BOX/CITY GARAGE 2250 R. EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 • EDDINGS BROTHERS -AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS- MISC. ARTS._MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 00165 001=4001205-431000245 $54.-6f 11/30/92 EQUIP SERVICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 00165 11/30/92 001-400-4205-431F _00285 $35.00 EQUIP SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 - 001=400=4205=-540200019 $52,1.6 12/01/92 EQUIP SERVICE/EQUIPMENT-MORE THAN $500 00165 105-400-2601-4311.. 00297 $55.03 11/30/92 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 —110=400=3302-43IT 00835 $336-28 11/30/92 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 160-400-3102-4311 00213 $141. 95 - 11/30/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE 42765 12/10/92 01127 42765 $0.00 12/10/92 01127 -42765- $0.00 12/10/92 10 01127 $0. 00 42765--- 12/10/92 01 127 - 42765 $0.00 12/10/92 01127 42765 $0. 00 12/10/92 01127 42765 $0.00 12/10/92 01127 42765 $0.00 12/10/92 01127 42765 $0.00 12/10/92 01 127 - 42765 $0.00 12/10/92 2250—O6002 427 $770. 55 12/10/92 01127 -- 42765 $0.00 12/10/92 *44: VENDOR TOTAL ****±r**************►*****4*****•n***•n************************* i***** -$3; 214:�f— R EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICES INC. JANITORIAL SRV. FOR NOV 8-093 a • 01127 42 $0.00 12/10/92 01127 42765 .$0.00 12/10/92 01294 001-400-4204-4201 00553 41.325.00 1178-093 00039 42766 11/25/92 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/10/92 • 71 t 72 • a .. v F I NANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:17:06" PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR"12710/92- VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC -- PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************** w** ***-* R FASTENER CORPORATION PIER REPAIR SUPPLIES PAGE 0010 DATE 121101 11� INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UUENC DATE EXP- $1,325. XP $1,325. 00 04915 125-400-8506-4309 ....00055 $465:48 09984 11/20/92 CIP 86-506 *** VENDOR TOTAL#*******************#***#*****#*#*#*#*#*#####*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#4#****# R CAROLEE*FURUKAWA FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 00009984 05287 42767 $465.48 12/10/92 ' - 04978 .. -001-400-4601-4221".-"00116 - - $175:00- 12/03/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR -4** VENDOR TOTAL*#************1r*************#*****##******************************** R _PAM*GACH DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND $f75-00 04976 001-210-0000-2110 05160 $250.00 12/01/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE --*** VENDOR -TOTAL ***************-*************-********#*******#********************** R -- GARRETT CONSTRUCTION WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 05780 42768 $0.00 12/10/92 2, 22 z, 24 05453 42769 $0.00 12/10/92 25 27,1 $256700 00814 001-210-0000-2110 -05162 $600.00 05451 "- 42770 12/01/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/10/92 _#8* --VENDOR -TOTAL **3F***#**4444*#***# *4'#*****#*****#****#***#**#******#*#**##****4-** -..-- - GROUP At1ERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 GROUP -AMERICA LIFE -INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 GROUP -AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 --R' --GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R - GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 i:r - R -"" GROUP"AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 $600T 00-- 04397 0O1 -4O0 -12I2-418802579-- --$598:58 12/01/92 598 5812/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04397 105=400=2601--4188 0I3/2 $16.10 34 36 0 3] 3U 39 • 40 00028-'" 42771 12/01/92 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04397- 109-400=3301-4188_. 00342 - - $1__38__.._., 12/01/92 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04397 ' 110-400=3302-4188 01646 12/01/92 PARKING ENF 43 44 $0.00 12/10/92 0002 4d//1 $0.00 12/10/92 4, 46 47 8 SO 5I 00028 - 42771 $0.00 12/10/92 565T78- /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04397 115-400-8144-4188 00069 $1.15 12/01/92 CIP 90-144 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04397 115-400=8178=4188"-'00069 $2776 12/01/92 CIP 90-178 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00028 42771 $0.00 12/10/92 00028 -_.-' 42771 $0.00 12/10/92 56 51 • 53 w 00028 42771 $0.00 12/10/92 ,,LJ sit tep 0 ' FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:17:06 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R P. R R R R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 - GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE -- CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 • GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 ----44*-VENDOR •' • I I N II CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/10/92 - VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4$ AMOUNT DATE INVC- PROJ # -- -ACCOUNT-DESCRIPTION--_._..---' 04397 125-400-8313-4188 00081- $0:92 -' 12/01/92 CIP 92-513 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -04397 155-400-2102-4188 00869 12/01/92 CROSSING GUARD -04397 160-400=3102=4188-` 01354 12/01/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN $0.92' /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -$12.42 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04397 --- 170-400-2103-4189 00359' - '$2875 12/01/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04397 --705=400=1209=4188 00653 12/01/92 LIABILITY INS 04397 705-400-1217-4188 00728 12/01/92 WORKERS COMP $2 -30 - /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PAGE 0011 DATE 12/10/92 INV/REF PO 4$ CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP-- 00028 XP-- 00028--.--'- 42771 $0.00 12/10/92 00028 42771 $0. 00 12/10/92 00028- - - 42771 $0.00 12/10/92 -00028----4277F $0. 00 12/10/92 $3.45 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TOTAL-******************************************************************** $734.51 HEALTHNET• CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 HEALTHNET- 00241 001-400-1212=4188 02577 "1ce 1322 9! 12/01/92 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R "- HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R HEALTHNET-- -00241--305=400=21101=41-88 01170 $857.74 00028._._-. 42771-- $0.00 12/10/92 00028-'- -_ 42771 $0.00 12/10/92 • ,fl 2n l2 ' 24 25 •z� 2fl 2'3 12 12/01/92 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00241 109-400-3301=4188 00340 ---- $62:89 12/01/92 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R HEALTHNET 00241 12/01/92 -00241- 12/01/92 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 110=400=3302-4188-01644 $27121.73 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 115-400-8144-4198 00067 $50.31 CIP 90-144 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 002-4r---115=400=8178=4188-00067 $1 -DT -61 12/01/92 CIP 90-178 00016 ------ 42772-_ $0. 00 12/10/92 00016 -42772 $0.00 12/10/92 -00016 -42772- $0. 00 12/10/92 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00241 125-400-8513-4188 00079 -- 52516 12/01/92 CIP 92-513 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00241- -155-400=2102-41$8 -'00867 $50.-31 12/01/92 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS • ,v • 4p 41 44 :•4J • 48 000 f6 $0.00 12/10/92 00016-----42772 _ _--42772 $0.00 12/10/92 100016- $0.00 00016$0.00 12/10/92 00016 ---._-- 42772 $0.00 12/10/92 00016 ---42772 $0. 00 12/10/92 5, • 521 • 56 55 • • �rn *D 1 0 • 0 0 1 ' 1 +'„ I MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 1 VENDOR-TOTAL'"##########***#**###########*####*########*###########*############## FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17: 17:06 -- PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R -• HEALTHNET _ CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R HEALTHNET - CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 R HEALTHNET" CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR _.12/10/92 PAGE 0012 DATE 12410/9 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK !1 DATE INVC " PROJ 4 - ----ACCOUNT-DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP -- 00241 -160-400=3102=4188 --01352 12/01/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN 00241 160-400-8408-4188 - 00057 12/01/92 CIP 89-408 00241 ---170-400=2103-4188 00358` 12/01/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS 00241 705-400-1209-4188 00651 12/01/92 LIABILITY INS 00241 705-400-1217-4188" 00726 12/01/92 WORKERS COMP $659-04 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $31.44 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $561-76 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $153."92 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -$153.92 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************************d****4*********-_ $23, 651. 72 'R """ CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH 04075 -705=400=1217-4182- 0025T 348;312729 WORK COMP CLAIMS/NOV 92 12/04/92 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************#******.***********************#****** _—_$48,312.29- HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065- 001-400=1207-4311` -0007f- $4.00 MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 11/30/92 BUS LICENSE /AUTO MAINTENANCE HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 R ----- HERMOSA-CAR WASH --" MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 R HERMOSA *CAR WASH . 00065 001-400-2101-4311 01549 $132..00 11/30/92 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00065 001-:400-420i=4311----00322---- $20700- 11/30/92 BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00065 - ...-105-400-2601-4311 00295 $8.00 11/30/92 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE R LORI*HIGGINS FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR -00016 - -_. "' 42772- $0.00 12/10/92 00016 42772 $0. 00 12/10/92 00016 - -- 42772- $0.00 42772- $0. 00 12/10/92 00016 42772 $0.00 12/10/92 1{� 00016 - -42772-- $0.00 12/10/92 05525 42773 21 2-223 241 27 281 32 $0.00 12/10/92 01136"— 42774 $0.00 12/10/92 33 >,0 37 16 • 3L1 ";110 01136 $0.00 12/10/92 :;41b $T64. 0U 01136 42774- $0.00 12/10/92 01136 $0. 00 42774---- 12/10/92 4843 SI 12 52 56 • (4 03404 _._. -._-001=400-4601-422.1 00117- $602-00• -" " 05764- --42775-----V 12/03/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR $0.00 12/10/92 "CI ____.***_VENDOR'TOTAL_*##***##****##*#***********#***********#**#**********#*##*####*##**w $602..00 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC DISCOUNT OFFERED 50402 • 02458 001-202-0000-2021---* 00318 - 11/23/92 -$5.08 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 50402 01137 $0. 00 42776 "--- 12/10/92 64 iL 2: 0 s • 19 QI • a I, • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:17:06 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12710/92 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 8 AMOUNT _ DATE INVC ----. PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0013 DATE -12/10/9 INV/REF PO iF CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE -ELECTRIC '-"--""O2458 ---001-202-00002022---00312 $5. 0ECR --50402- 01137`---- 42776- DISCOUNT 2776DISCOUNT TAKEN 50402 11/23/92 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 12/10/92 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 105-400-2601-4309 00953 '$249.31 50402 01137 42776 MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 50402 11/23/92 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/10/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL-********************************************************************--_._-____-$249.31_._-_ R INTERNATIONAL CONF OF BUILDING 00667 001-400-4201-4305 00817 $85._51..._- B82373 04266_ -42777-- PUBLICATIONS/BLDG 82373 11/23/92 , BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 12/10/92 *** VENDOR-TOTAL**********4********************************************************* $85. 5i R CREATIVE*JUICES 04901 001-400-4601-4302 - 00201 --.-_"$400.-00- 05773 42778 TYPESET/SPRING BROCHURE 12/08/92 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING $0.00 12/10/92 *** VENDOR.-TOTAL-*$****************************************************************** $400.00 ROLLAND E. *KING. FALL CLASS REFUND -04979--- 001-300-0000=3893--"_00745 -J_-- --$30. 00 48003 05779 42779 48003 12/03/92 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 12/10/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************i****************** $30. 00 R LAIDLAW TRANSIT 04972 145-400-3409-4201 00037 — $1,112.64- 413596 05325"-._..--42780- ROSE PARADE BUS/COMM RES 13596 07/21/92 REC TRANSPTN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/10/92 i ----------***'VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3;[127b4 LANDSCAPE WEST. INC. PARKS MAINT FOR NOV. 92 08723 04303'o01 -400-610i4201'' 00303 $8; 585: 50 _ 008723 00073 42781 11/25/92 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/10/92 ***'VENDOR-TOTAL*************************************************************** * 4 $-8-58575 COMMANDER MICHAEL*LAVIN ' REIMB TUITION/SPRING 93 00792 - 001-400-2101-4316 00964 $42.1700 12/02/92 POLICE /TRAINING ***""VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4421:00 STUART*LEVCHENKO FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06115 42782-- . 10.00 2782-- $0.00 12/10/92 04252 . 001-400-4601-4221' 00120 - $196:00 -_-_-_---_.. -_.-- - -- 05769 42783 12/.03/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR $0. 00 12/10/92 • 0 cr 4111 67 • f.41 • ,2 O FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17:17:06 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R • STUART*LEVCHENKO `_"_._ FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0014 FOR 12710792 DATE 12t1-0792 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE INVC PROJ # TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # ACCOUNT_DESCRIPTION _' AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP -04232 001-400-4601-4221- 00123 5546.007 - 05761 42783 12/03/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR ***************************************************************#*#**_.-..-._.$742.00 R LINDA*LOCKE _ 02832 001-400-4601-4221 ' `-00122------$465:-50 FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/03/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************-------_$465.50__. -.R.-_ -__- -SEAN*MC CORMACK 160 tir 2 613 6 lb $0. 00 12/10/92 1 05767- 427E14- $0.00 2784_$0.00 12/10/92 20 04974 001-210-0000-21[0 05163 $100.00 45733 05450 42785 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 45733 12/07/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/10/92 SEAN*MC CORMACK GYM RENTAL 04974 001-300-0000-3405 01472 $60000R 45733 05450 42785 45733 12/07/92 /COMM CTR RENTALS ----- *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $40700 • $0.00 12/10/92 22 23 2d 25 266 27 28 R ERIC L.*NILSEN 04980 001-300-0000=3893- 00746 430.-00 - 47744 05778 42786 FALL CLASS REFUND 47744 12/03/92 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES at**"VENDOR-TOTA***********•r*****•p************************************************** $30700 $0. 00 12/10/92 29 3G� 32 33 34 36 3•. 40 • 6 . M1II R JOHN*0'ROURKE 64618 001-400-4601-4221 00121 —"—" $105.00 — -" - 0578! -42787 �•.51 • '; FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/03/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR $0.00 12/10/92 ^`4b, E +., —Ai** VENDOR _TOTAL##*4**********#*#**1►*• *** 44*.**** *4********-#*******If44*I **-aF#IF#*#* $105.00--- r R OTTO*PALMER - - 02894 -001-210-0000-2110 05164------$17600:-00- 1726-000871 05455-- - 42788-- • 1,i WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 00871 12/08/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/10/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************4-********** *****4#**# 'W3 i0070U ::. 'R KATHY*PERKINS 0,1 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND FT 11 1 .4! 52 56 57 04977 - 001-210-0000-2110 05159 $50.00 05456 42789-"-- 12/07/92 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/10/92 - Q *** ** DOR--TOTA- *******#**************#*****#*#*****************#*****#*-**4IF*aF##*3F7F R $50.00 PHOENIX GROUP 02530 -001-400-1206-4201 01070 $600:00 - - 6271-00"-00075-"" - 42790 -- CITE SOFTWARE SUPP/QTR 2 71-00 12/04/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/10/92 ,: Q J 4 1! e) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 17:17:06 --.----_. FOR 12/10/92 PAGE 0015 DATE 12/10/92 PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN iF AMOUNT INV/REF PO It CHK * DESCRIPTION - DATE INVC PROJ It ----ACCOUNT-DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP _ s * ** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************4*********************** $600.00 R POSTMASTER - 00398 001-400-4601-4305 01102 $1,200.00 05786 42791 POSTAGE/SPRING BROCHURE 12/09/92 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 12/10/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** -- $1,200:00 R RADIO SHACK - 01429 001-400-2101-4305 01884 $49124 073687 01258 42792 MISC. CHARGES FOR DEC 92 73687 12/03/92 210004 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 12/10/92 * ** VENDOR-TOTAL******************************************************************** $49.24 R RANDY*RODMAN 04975 - 001-210-0000-2110 05161 - $1,600:00 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 11/24/92 05452 • , • l8 42793 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/10/92 ----- 444 -*** VENDOR-TOTAL-******************************************************************** X1.600.00 39 • R SYLVIA*ROOT 04061 001-400-4102-4201 00387 $280.75 007274=14-92 05810 42794 -- 3! SEC SERV/DEC 1, 1992 14-92 12/07/92 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/10/92 I 9;. --- *** VENDOR-TOTAL******************************************************************** $280:75 R BETTY*SAKS — - 04982 001-300-0000-3893 00747 $16.00 - 49511-..05765- 42795 - FALL CLASS REFUND 49511 12/03/92 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 12/10/92 *** VENDOR-TOTAL******************************************************************** $1-67-00- -SHORELINE 1-b-06 :z 48 -SHORELINE PRINTING 03505 001-400-2101=4305 -01885- - $i-185-34 -9904 05100 42796— POLICE RECORDS FORMS 9904 12/02/92 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $1,185.34 12/10/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL.._************************************************************ ** ** $T7Te5T34 And - - R -. 0. SCOTT*SMITH FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 49 52 n 03377 -- 001-400-4601-4221 00118 ---- $470:-40.-.-__._-._.-_-"--- 05763 - 42797 12/03/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $470::40 SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHARGES FOR NOV 92 05878 $0.00 12/10/92 00018 001-400-2201-4309- 01407 — -$38:15 - 05878 01165 -_.. 42798 11/13/92 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/10/92 • I • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 17: 17:06 ---- PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHARGES FOR NOV 92 05878 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHARGES FOR NOV 92 05878 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR -12/10792 PAGE 0016 DATE-12/10792- VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # --DATE-INVC PROJ # " `ACCOUNT -DESCRIPTION — '-` AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00018 - 001=4003103-4309 - 01448 11/13/92 ST MAINTENANCE $15: 00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00018 001-400-3104-4309 00992 $15.00 11/13/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL__-;t*****************#************#**************4# ***********#**444** $68.15 W zl 4.3 rr s 05878 01165 ----42798-----9 $0.00 12/10/92 "'r z 05878 01165 42798 ,3 $0.00 12/10/92 ::410 R SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 01688 001-400-4205-4251-._00004 - $414700 007274-14-92 06011 42799 AGMD PERMIT FEES 14-92 11/16/92 EQUIP SERVICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 12/10/92 *** VENDOR-TOTAL--*******************T►************************************************ R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO SWEEP SERV/NOV 92 2890 R- SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE -CO SWEEP SERVICE/NOV 92 2890 00115 001-400-3103-4201 00437 11/30/92 ST MAINTENANCE -00115 109-400=3301=420.1___. 00159 11/30/92 VEH PKG DIST $414:-00' $1 , 918. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $3; 055.06 9 0 2890.. 00027 42800 $0.00 12/10/92 2890 00027 42800 22 24 25 -2'67 Ilk /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/10/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****** ********************************************************** $4,973.00 - SUPERIOR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 00425 001-400-2201=4309 01404 $27700 93771- "01171 -" 42801 MISC. CHARGES FOR NOV 92 93771 11/20/92 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/10/92 *4* VENDOR TOTAL 4********* ***** ************************-x*************************: --__ $27.00 - - - - STEVE*WEINKAUF FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 04617 -001-400-4601-4221^00119 $273.00 12/03/92 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************+i•********************************;r********...._ R --XEROX- CORPORATION _--._._- XEROX --CORPORATION COPIER USAGE/OCT 92 --_.._-$273.00 05762 42802 32 33 34 � 35 13 41 $0.00 12/10/92 00135 - 001=400=1208-4201- 00946-- - $391788- -035377640 00007 77640 11/18/92 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** - *** PAY--CODE-TOTAL-*********************Ir***-*******************************-*******Ii** *** TOTAL WARRANTS***************************************************.t**************— - $391. 88 $158T714.14 4280J 12/10/92 • 64 111046r604141,1 flit DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY r $610, 015. 41 THt WARI4ANTS LISTED ON PA ES L TO l6_.INCLUSIVC OF t FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND_ARE_1N.CONFOdMANCE Dal -11 4 h4) I •• EI ANCF+DIRL I .. DATE 2`�i//D�%� . ji WARRANT REGISTER FOR /O 1 ARE ACCURAr TO TH BUDGET, • December 3, 1992 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council December 15, 1992 CANCELLATION ON WARRANTS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the warrants listed below. #042085 - 9/24/92 - Jeffrey Turney - $50.00 - Account Number 001-210-0000-2110. The warrant was never received by payee. Stop payment requested. #041910 - 9/10/92 - 170-400-2103-4316. expenses. #042516 - 11/12/92 001-300-0000-3893. Officer Nancy Cook - $32.00 - Account Number Officer does not want to be reimbursed for - Marcy Dutton - $15.00 - Account Number Duplicate payment. Warrant was never mailed. #042583 - 11/19/92 - Independent Order of Oddfellows - $629.00 - Account Number 001-210-0000-2110 for $500.00 and Account Number 001-400-1203-4320 for $129.00. Two vendors were combined in error during computer input. Warrant was never mailed. Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager City Treasurer Noted for fiscal impact Viki Copeland Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 12, 1993 ��-1 -gam December 10, 1992 City Council Meeting of December 15, 1992 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Proposal to designate $1000 of Prop C funds for the City's fair share of EIR cost for Metro Green Line light rail South Coast extension Approval of Management Resolution Adjustment of Park Tax Selection of Councilmember to sit on the R/UDAT Recommendation Steering Committee Discussion and request for approvaL for an AIA sponsored design com- petition for the Municipal Pier Public Hearing Appeal of Planning Commission denial of CUP amendment for property located at 1100 Strand January 26, 1993 South School conceptual design February 23, 1993 Effect of nonconforming ordinance on damaged structures Request for Council guidance and prioritization for the development of the Biltmore site park Planning Director City Mgr./Personnel Dir. Building Director Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Planning Director Community Resources Dir. Planning Director Community Resources Dir. ++***************************************************************** UPCOMING ITEMS NOT YET CALENDARED Initiated by Party Date Staff Staff Caltrans utility mainten- ance agreement Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Public Works Dir. Public Works Dir. lc t Council 5/8/90 Re. oil project CUP - define "temporary" as it relates to height of project (needs text amendment) Council 6/6/91 Council 5/26/92 Staff Review Bldg/Zoning Code changes to improve liveability Revision of HBMC pro- visions pertaining to construction of public street improvements (public hearing) Evaluation of Public Information Program Planning Dir. Planning Dir. Public Works Dir. Public Safety/(Parking Enforcement/Animal Control) Request for approval of the Tenant/Users Liability Insur- ance Program (TULIP) and establishment of an admin- istrative fee for processing TULIP applications Staff Resolution re. 5 year exten- sion of the Joint Powers Agreement for the South Bay Corridor Study, Phase III Staff Final public hearing for Land Use Element WP/FUTRAGND Personnel Dir. Planning Dir. Planning Dir. Honorable Mayor and Members of the, City Council December 7, 1992 City Council Meeting of December 15, 1992 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of November 1992. This is the most current available investment information. Respectfully submitted, Gary L. utsch City Treasurer NOTED: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager id INVESTMENT REPORT • NOVEMBER 1992 DATE OF DATE OF ASKING MARKET INSTITUTION TOTAL INVESTMENT MATURITY PRICE VALUE INTEREST LAIF BALANCE 11/1/92 $8,645,000.00 Maturity (50,000.00) 11/03/92 Maturity (150,000.00) 11/10/92 Maturity (205,000:00) 11/12/92 Maturity (150,000.00) 11/19/92 BALANCE 11/30/92 18,090,000.00 LACPIF Railroad Right -of -Way Account BALANCE 11/01/92 11,064,744.43 Investment 202,758.91 11/12/92 BALANCE 11/30/92 $1,267,503.34 CORPORATE NOTES: Ford Motor Credit Co. Investment U.S. TREASURY BOND Investment Investment 4.73% 4.12% 1500,000.00 5/19/88 5/20/93 1 500,000.00 $ 502,455.00 9.10% 1996,875.00 5/14/90 2/15/93 1 996,875.00 11,014,060.00 8.375% 11,005,937.50 9/14/90 6/30/94 11,005,937.50 11,066,880.00 8.50% INVESTMENT TOTAL $11,860,315.84 SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST BALANCE 10/1/92 $527,819.81 Adjustment 57.93 10/31/92 BALANCE 10/31/92 $527,877.74 CHICAGO TITLE BALANCE 07/01/92 BALANCE 07/31/92 $11,921.08 8.625% $11,921.08 7.5% TRUSTEE TOTAL $539,798.82 GRAND TOTAL Respectfully Submitted, $12,400,114.66 Gary L. Brutsch City Treasurer /.� —15 -yam --- November 5, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 15, 1992 INSTALLATION OF MARKED, UNCONTROLLED CROSSWALKS(*) ACROSS MANHATTAN AVENUE BETWEEN 27TH STREET AND LONGFELLOW AVENUE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve installation of a Marked Uncontrolled crosswalk across the north leg of Manhattan Avenue at 29th Street for a one year test study to determine its effectiveness. Background: Over the last six months several citizens have approached City staff, the City's Traffic Safety Committee, and City Council person(s) for the express purpose of considering installation of Marked crosswalks across Manhattan Avenue between the above limits. The proponents' belief is that it is difficult to cross Manhattan Avenue without some type of marking and/or signing at selected locations. Vehicular traffic does not presently stop for pedestrians crossing the street. The City Traffic engineer and the City Traffic Safety Committee denied the requests based on the following: 1. The Uncontrolled type Marked crossing does not provide a greater safety factor for crossing pedestrians than having no marking. (*) A "Marked" crosswalk is defined as a painted crossing area, painted path or painted corridor across a street. It is most often depicted as two lines separated by some distance usually ten feet. It can be a "ladder" or "zebra" configuration for added delineation, but it uses paint to define the crossing corridor. The "Uncontrolled" aspect of the Marked crossing is such that vehicular traffic that passes over the "Marked" crosswalk is not forced to stop by stop controls or traffic signal indications. In the absence of a pedestrian, vehicle traffic across the Marked crosswalk continues as if there were not any markings whatsoever. 1e 2. When one leg across an intersection was marked with a crosswalk, a major study showed there was a 3:1 greater accident history in the Marked crosswalk. Some engineers believe that a false sense of security occurs by thinking that the two lines are, in effect, enough to have vehicles stop for the pedestrians. 3. The liability of placing such crosswalks is great in the face of other major Southern California cities findings that Uncontrolled Marked crosswalks are undesirable. 4. The City policy regarding installation of Marked crosswalks requires a "warrant" study for each location to be considered. None of the Manhattan Avenue locations met this criteria when the City Traffic Engineer studied the crossings. Analysis: The City Traffic Engineer has prepared the attached report entitled MARKED VS. UNMARKED CROSSWALK STUDY AT UNCONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS highlighting the results of the major Southern California Cities findings with respect to Uncontrolled Marked crosswalks. The City Traffic Engineer also studied specific Uncontrolled, Marked crosswalks in Hermosa Beach. These included Hermosa Avenue crossings at 14th, 10th, 6th, and 4th Streets. The latter study provides insight into specific Hermosa Beach conditions as opposed to larger cities 1. Uncontrolled Marked crosswalks in San Diego showed a 6 to 1 worse record than the Unmarked, Uncontrolled crosswalks. 2. In Long Beach this ratio was 7.5:1. 3. In San Diego, in terms of pedestrian usage twice as many pedestrians are hurt in the Marked crosswalk as opposed to the Unmarked crosswalk at the same intersection. 4. Hermosa Avenue Uncontrolled Marked crosswalks are virtually pedestrian accident free since 1988. Thus, there is some uncertainty relative to appropriateness of Marked Uncontrolled crosswalks in our jurisdiction as opposed to larger jurisdictions. Manhattan Avenue Crossing Considerations A further review of the Manhattan Avenue crossings between 27th Street and Longfellow Avenue indicates that the highest usage is for crossings at 29th Street. Crossings at 28th Street are slightly below the 29th Street crossing. The latter location is close to 27th Street. As such, northbound traffic would be accelerating from the four-way stop at 27th Street as they pass 28th Street. Northbound vehicles having to stop at the 28th Street crosswalk for pedestrians could contribute to rear -end type accidents. A marked crossing across 29th Street affords both northbound and southbound vehicles a good view at the proposed crossing. The crossings at 30th and 31st Streets have very low pedestrian crossing volume and should not be considered for marking of crosswalks. Based on the moderate usage at 29th and 28th Streets, it is recommended that a test installation marked crosswalk be placed across 29th Street for a period of one year to analyze its operation. The crosswalk would be marked, advance signed, and advance pavement markings placed to ensure the highest possible visibility. Alternative: Retain status quo. There have not been any prior pedestrian accidents at either of the Manhattan Avenue crossings, only public requests and complaints relative to the fact that drivers do not stop for crossing pedestrians. Respectfully submitted, Ed Ruzak City Traffic Engi,heer Charles McDonald Director of Public Works Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Attachment: City Traffic Engineer's Report pworks/ccxwalks MARKED VS. UNMARKED CROSSWALK STUDY AT UNCONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS • This study provides information to the City Council relative to the following: - City approved policy on marking crosswalks in Hermosa Beach. - Major southern California cities findings regarding marking of crosswalks. • - Results of City Traffic Engineer's study of Uncontrolled Unmarked crosswalks across Hermosa Avenue. DEFINITION A "Marked, Uncontrolled Crosswalk" is defined as a painted crossing area, painted path or painted corridor across a street. It is often depicted as two lines separated by some distance, usually ten feet. It can be a "ladder or zebra" configuration for added delineation of the crossing area, but uses paint to define the crossing area. The "Uncontrolled" aspect of the crossing is such that vehicular traffic that passes over the "Marked" crosswalk is not forced to stop by stop controls or traffic signal indications. In the absence of a pedestrian crossing the vehicular traffic across the marked area continues as if there were not any marking whatsoever. CITY POLICY The City has identified a concept plan for suggested school walking routes that a child may follow to and from school. This plan was approved by the City Council on June 24, 1986 and is discussed below: The walking corridors that were identified all have positive controls such as stop signs, traffic signals, and crossing guards that can be used by children on their walk to and from school. Crosswalk markings serve primarily to guide pedestrians into the proper path. Pedestrian crosswalk markings should not be used indiscriminately, as their presence can be detrimental to pedestrian safety. In some cases, pedestrians can be given a false sense of security due to the prominent appearance of the crosswalk to the pedestrian, resulting in a lack of caution. Pedestrian crosswalk markings may be installed where they are advisable to channelize pedestrians into the preferred path at intersections when the intended course is not readily apparent or when in the opinion of the engineer, their presence would minimize pedestrian -auto conflicts. In general, crosswalks should not be marked at intersections unless they are intended to channelize pedestrians. Emphasis is placed on the use of Marked crosswalks as a channelization device rather than as a safety device. The following factors may be considered in determining whether a Marked crosswalk should be used. - vehicular approach speeds from both directions - vehicular volume and density - vehicular turning movements - pedestrian volumes - roadway width - day and night visibility by both pedestrians and motorists for sighted or sight -impaired pedestrians - discourage pedestrian use of undesirable routes - consistency with markings at adjacent intersections or within the same intersection. Uniqueness of Hermosa Beach In Hermosa Beach, the mixture of beach oriented patrons with school oriented pedestrians precludes a policy of eliminating the painting of crosswalks. Without some form of channelization and formal control at key locations, there would be wanton and random crossings in midblock. This is highly undesirable. However, when an Uncontrolled crosswalk is installed, there needs to be advanced signing, crosswalk signing, advance pavement markings and a higher visibility crosswalk, i.e. cross hatching or a "ladder type". If there are unusual geometrics to the approaching crossing then consideration of flashing beacons and/or additional pavement markings may be needed. This has to be determined on the basis of an engineering study by the City Traffic Engineer with involvement of school district and police personnel. In Hermosa Beach it was determined that ALL Marked crosswalks shall be the ladder type. The high visibility and contrast of paint versus asphalt between the ladder pattern affords greater visibility than the conventional two line crosswalk. Further,when an Uncontrolled Marked crosswalk is provided it shall be painted in the ladder type configuration with advance pavement markings, advance signing and signing at the crosswalk. The only exceptions to this policy will be on the state highway system, Pacific Coast Highway and Artesia Blvd. These shall remain as determined by Caltrans since they are under their jurisdiction. - 2 - Existing Marked Crosswalks 1988 - Existing Marked crosswalks have been removed or upgraded to ladder type crosswalks as shown in the suggested route to school plan. All crosswalk removals have been done by sand blasting or other methods such that the visibility of the crosswalk is no longer obvious to pedestrians or motorists. (This was completed in 1989.) - All Marked crosswalks have been removed except those within the designated "School Zone Area of Influence" as shown on the "Suggested Route Plan". The School Zone Area of Influence includes the roadways contiguous to the school building and the area within a reasonable distance proximate to the school grounds. Thus, yellow Marked crosswalks are placed in the "School Zone Area of Influence". This is consistent with the discretionary "may" portions of the CVC Section 21368 (1). (This was completed in 1989.) - Non -intersectional (midblock) pedestrian crossings are generally unexpected by the motorist and should be discouraged unless, in the opinion of the traffic engineer, there is strong justification in favor of such installation. Particular attention should be given to roadways with two or more traffic lanes in one direction as a pedestrian may be hidden from view by a vehicle yielding the right-of-way to a pedestrian. - The uniqueness of the pedestrian corridors proximate to the beach, namely Hermosa Avenue and Pier Avenue, necessitate channelization for pedestrians at select Uncontrolled locations. The treatment for marking these crosswalks shall be to provide ladder type markings, crosswalk signing, advance crossing signing and advance pavement markings. - Marked crosswalks will also be considered at those locations that have unusual geometrics or potentially confusing travel paths for pedestrians. An example of this current situation is the intersection of 27th/Greenwich Village and Manhattan Avenue. - Whenever a marked pedestrian crosswalk has been established in a roadway contiguous to a school building or the grounds thereof, it shall be painted or marked in yellow as shall be all the marked pedestrian crosswalks at an intersection in case any one of the crosswalks is required to be marked in yellow. Other established Marked pedestrian crosswalks may be painted or marked in yellow if either (a) the nearest point of the crosswalk is no more than 600 feet from a school building or the grounds thereof, or (b) the nearest point of the crosswalk is not more than 2,800 feet from a school building or the grounds thereof, there are no intervening crosswalks other than those contiguous to the school - 3 - grounds, and it appears that the facts and circumstances require special painting or marking of the crosswalks for the protection and safety or persons attending the school. - Limit lines in front of Uncontrolled Marked crosswalks will not normally be required. If an engineering study indicates that drivers are violating the pedestrian crossing area then consideration of painting limit lines at these Uncontrolled crossings should be given. - In front of stop controlled intersections where ladder crosswalks were installed, there are NO limit lines. Existing limit lines in these situations have been removed prior to painting the new crosswalk. (This is current policy and has been done.) New Marked Crosswalks Requests for new marked crosswalks shall be investigated using - the criteria discussed earlier in this policy. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CITIES FINDINGS ON MARKED CROSSWALKS Three prominent studies in southern California point out some interesting information relative to marking crosswalks in uncontrolled situations. The first, the "San Diego Crosswalk" study was done in 1970. This is a report of a study of pedestrian accident experience at unsignalized intersections and whether the occurrence is less in Marked or in Unmarked crosswalks. Accident experience covering a 5 -year period was studied at 400 intersections, each having one Marked and one Unmarked crosswalk crossing the main thoroughfare. In addition, pedestrian and vehicle traffic characteristics were studied to determine the pedestrian's relative use of Marked and Unmarked crosswalks and his exposure to vehicular traffic. The results of this study show that pedestrian accident ratios and crosswalk use ratios tend to cover a range of values depending on the type of intersection where the crosswalk is located. But, in general, more pedestrian accidents occur in Marked crosswalks than in Unmarked crosswalks by a ratio of approximately 6 to 1.(*) Evidence indicates that the poor accident record of Marked crosswalks is not due to the crosswalk being marked as much as it is a reflection on the pedestrian's attitude and lack of caution when using the Marked crosswalk. (*) When the ratio was compared with how many pedestrians actually use the Marked crosswalk versus the Unmarked one, the ratio is 2:1. In general, Marked crosswalks have the following advantages. 1. They may help pedestrians orient themselves and find their way across complex intersections. 2. They may help show pedestrians the shortest route across traffic. 3. They may help show pedestrians the route with the least exposure to vehicular traffic and traffic conflicts. 4. They may help position pedestrians where they can be seen best by oncoming traffic. 5. They may help utilize the presence of luminaries to improve pedestrian nighttime safety. 6. They may help channelize and limit pedestrian traffic to specific locations. 7. They may aid in enforcing pedestrian crossing regulations. 8. They may act, in a limited manner, as a warning device and reminder to motorists that this is a location where pedestrian conflicts can be expected. Marked crosswalks also exhibit some disadvantages. 1. They may cause pedestrians to have a false sense of security and to place themselves in a hazardous position with respect to vehicular traffic. 2. They may cause the pedestrian to think that the motorist can and will stop in all cases, even when it is impossible to do so. 3. They may cause a greater number of rear -end and associated collisions due to pedestrians not waiting for gaps in traffic. 4. They may cause an increase in fatal and serious -injury accidents. 5. They may cause an increase in community -wide accident insurance rates. 6. They may cause a disrespect for all pedestrian regulations and traffic controls. Unjustified and poorly located Marked crosswalks may cause an increased expense to the taxpayers for installation and maintenance costs that may not be justified in terms of improved public safety. Indeed, such crosswalks may tend to increase the hazard to pedestrians and motorists alike. - 5 - The second study was done in February in 1986 for the City of Long Beach by a consulting firm, Wildan Associates. In brief, 499 pedestrian accidents over a ten year period occurred at uncontrolled intersections which were not protected by either traffic signals or stop signs, a total of 440 (88%) occurred within marked crosswalks and 59 (12%) occurred within crosswalk areas which were not delineated by paint upon the roadway. The ratio of the number of pedestrian accidents at Uncontrolled intersections between Marked crosswalks and Unmarked crosswalks was found to be 7.5 to 1. The severity of pedestrian accidents in Marked crosswalks at Uncontrolled intersections was also greater than that experienced within Unmarked crosswalks at Uncontrolled intersections. In total, 6% of the initial pedestrian accident reports which occurred in Marked crosswalks at Uncontrolled intersections resulted in fatalities. No fatalities occurred within Unmarked crosswalks at Uncontrolled intersections based upon review of the initial pedestrian accident reports. Based upon the City's review of all information relative to the City's recent pedestrian accident history, research of studies conducted by other agencies in regard to crosswalks and pedestrian safety and discussions with other local agencies having populations greater than 100,000 within Los Angeles and Orange Counties, it is recommended that the City of Long Beach Department of Public Works policy regarding Marked crosswalks at Uncontrolled locations be retained without modification. This policy indicates that: "Marked crosswalks shall not be installed at Uncontrolled locations unless special study by the City Traffic Engineer determines such markings to be necessary and desirable for the specific purpose of encouraging concentration of pedestrian crossings at a certain point." Third, the City of San Juan Capistrano, in April 1987 conducted a similar study with results similar to those discussed in Long Beach. HERMOSA AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH EXPERIENCE The City Traffic Engineer reviewed the pedestrian accident history at, four Uncontrolled Marked crosswalks across Hermosa Avenue. These locations are: Hermosa Avenue at 19th Street 10th Street Sixth Street Fourth Street Reported accident history from January 1, 1988 to August 31, 1992 were reviewed to determine the number of pedestrian accidents that have occurred at these crossings. There was only one reported accident. This occurred on February 22, 1992 at Fourth 6 Avenue. The driver that struck the crossing pedestrian had been drinking and was under the influence according to the police report. Random traffic counts of pedestrians crossing Hermosa Avenue at these Uncontrolled crossings average from 25 per day during the winter months to over 700 per day in summer. Vehicle traffic volumes on Hermosa Avenue range from 13,200 vehicles per day (both ways) near Nineteenth Avenue to 18,000 near Tenth Street. Near Fourth Street the volume levels reduce to 13,000. These are 1990 traffic count data. Travel speeds on Hermosa Avenue average 28 to 30 mph with an 85 percentile speed of 31.5 mph. This is the result of a 1992 survey conducted for this report. The posted, limit for Hermosa Avenue is 25 mph. DISCUSSION The evidence is clear from studies conducted in southern California cities larger than Hermosa Beach that uncontrolled Unmarked crosswalks can be a problem and a danger to pedestrians. This has not been supported in our City for the four Uncontrolled locations along Hermosa Avenue. It is not the intent to provide a statistically significant analysis of these reports nor the Hermosa Beach results. It merely shows that we in our City have not experienced the accident problems as in other cities. We have chosen to place advance pedestrian signs prior tothe crosswalks; we place pedestrian crossing signs at the crosswalks and also place pedestrian crossing pavement markings in advance of the crossing. We have chosen the "ladder type" marking to delineate the crosswalk for added emphasis. These factors may contribute to our good safety record at Uncontrolled crossings. MANHATTAN AVENUE CROSSINGS There are no Uncontrolled Marked crosswalks across Manhattan Avenue between 27th Street and Longfellow Avenue. Citizens have requested Marked crossings along this route. In July, August and September 1992 the City Traffic Engineer conducted pedestrian counts at the intersections of 28, 29, 30 and 31st Streets and Manhattan Avenue. Table 1 shows the daily totals for the three periods counted. 7 TABLE 1 DAILY PEDESTRIAN COUNTS CROSSING MANHATTAN AVENUE LOCATION CROSSING DATES OF PEDESTRIAN COUNT 7/6/92 8/3/92 9/30/92 Manhattan/30th Northside 19 20 11 /30th Southside 11 13 8 /31st Northside 5 3 4 /31st Southside 3 2 4 /29th Northside 36 38 24 /29th Southside 30 22 20 /28th Northside 31 26 27 /28th Southside 20 16 16 As seen, the pedestrian usage is low to moderate. Speeds however, on Manhattan Avenue are high despite the posted 25 mph limit. Field observations confirm that many vehicles do not stop for pedestrians that wait on the sidewalk or are attempting to cross while already in the street. Visibility of pedestrians by motor vehicle traffic is good and pedestrians ability to see vehicles is also good. This is in part due to the absence of curb parking throughout the majority of this route. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the above, the following is concluded: - Uncontrolled, Marked crosswalks in general have been found to be undesirable. - Hermosa Beach experience at four Uncontrolled Marked crossings does not support a problem with pedestrian accidents as established in larger cities. - Marking a crosswalk is acceptable when warranted using recognized engineering criteria. Manhattan Avenue pedestrian crossings are Unmarked and Uncontrolled. - Manhattan Avenue pedestrian crossing have low to moderate pedestrian usage. - 8 - - Manhattan Avenue vehicular traffic travels faster than the posted limit and generally fails to yield to crossing pedestrians. - Manhattan Avenue pedestrian crossings do not meet the accepted criteria we use for marking crosswalks. Respect ly•ubmi ea 1 Edward J. Ru Ti City Traffic gine- pworks/RUZAK2 11/92 December 7, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the City Council December 15, 1992 FOUR MAN PRO VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT Recommendation It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council approve the request from CE Sports and Entertainment to conduct a 4 - Man Professional Volleyball Tournament on Saturday and Sunday, May 22-23, 1993 on the Pier courts (Attachment A). It is further recommended that the Council approve the attached contract (Attachment B) that recommends permit fees of $3,254 and sets the operational guidelines for the event. Background Last year marked the first Hermosa Beach 4 -man tourney. Sponsored by CE Sports and Entertainment, who have conducted events in Hermosa Beach since 1985, this tournament features Olympic athletes in a new format with four (4) players to a side instead of the traditional two (2). CE Sports reported to the Commission that a women's exhibition game will be included this time around to introduce this new format to the top women in the game. CE Sports filed a permit application with the City and included a $500 application fee with the completed application (Attachment A). The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission recommended approval of this request at their November 19th meeting. Analysis This tournament was added to the roster last year by City Council. The approval was made in recognition of CE Sports long standing history of presenting successful and safe events in the City. The Council was also supportive of the event as it was held before the summer months and provided additional opportunities for downtown businesses during the off-season. This year's request is later in the Spring (last year's was in April) but still precedes the summer rush. The event sponsor is Budweiser. with co-sponsorship from Avian, Bausch&Lomb, and Mikasa. There were no negative incidents or security concerns at last year's tourney which attracted an estimated 3,000 spectators to the beach. if They have included a site plan for Council review "center court only" format that has been utilized tournament tour. All of the conditions set forth (attachment B) will remain the same as last year. which shows a for this in the contract In recognition of the fact that this is the first volleyball tournament request of the 1993 season, staff included a calendar of the three (3) events that are proposed this year that were approved for the 1992 season. Separate agenda items for each prospective tournament will be presented at future meetings. It should be noted that the organizers of the "Legends" tournament (for oldtimers) that has been held in Hermosa Beach in years past (though not for the past three (3) years) have indicated that they will be forwarding a request to the City for - a tournament in late September. CE Sports has a history of responsiveness to City concerns and has always adhered to the conditions set forth in the agreements. Staff recommends approval of the request with full confidence in the prospect of a safe and successful tournament. Other alternatives available to Council include: . Deny the request. . Approve the request with amended . Request additional information. Fiscal Impact: Revenue: Permit Fees: Police Fees: Film Permit Fees: Other Costs: Total: Expenses: $3,354.00 $1,840.00 759.25 833.00 $6,786.25 conditions. (estimated) (estimated banner/bus. license, co-sponsors) Direct costs: Police staffing (individual officers cost varies) to be reimbursed from fees charged. Indirect costs: Community Resources staff hours / contract administration. Included in permit fees. -2- ATTACHMENTS: 1. Permit Application (Attachment A) 2. Contract (Attachment B) 3. Minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission, November 19, 1992. 4. 1993 schedule of volleyball tournaments. Conc r: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Respectfully submitted, Mary/Cly, Director Com nity Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Director Finance Dept. • ATTACHMENT "A" City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Rsources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 318-0280 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION Organization's Name: American Beach Volleyball League, Inc. Profit X Non -Profit Non-profit Number Organization's Address: 6921B Woodley Ave. Van Nuys, CA -Zip Code Phone Number(s): (818) 782-8920, FAX (818) ,78211401 91406 Contact Person and Title: Bryan Stewart, Project Director Contact Person's Address: SAME —Zip Code Daytime Phone Number: Evening Phone Number: Brief Description of Event: Four -man professional beach volleyball tournament, one of twelve events on 1993 Budweiser 4 -Man Volleyball Tour. Championship to be taped for broadcast on ESPN. Date(s) of Event: Saturday & Sunday, May 22 5»23, 1993 r.. Location(s) of Event: South of Hermosa Beach Pier Set-up Time: Beginning Thursday, May 20, 8:00am Time Event is., to Commence: 9:00am on Saturday, May 22 . INN o y XS NI ONANUNIr/1N1r1arr a saw womatios asoa GSMAMN r0'NLA 'N 'i N 7It 9 ,, 't •e "t •1 • '1 • ". 1 Number of Participants (Including volunteers): 45 Anticipated Number of Spectators: 2,500 per day Number of Vehicles Involved and How Used: (2) trucks carrying scaffolding, banners and other equipment. Parked adjacent to site for setup, presentation and teardown. Description of Set—up for this Event: See attached site diagram. Additional Information or Special Requests: Request permission for organization and sponsors to sell merchandise. Request reservation of parking spaces at Pier Ave. turnaround at HB Pier and block off of, street as in previous years. Request use of Dept. of Community Resources parking lot for VIP parking as in previous years. Request beach cleaning and preparation prior to event. Fees, Charges and Other Requirements: Police Costs - $ +: Fire Costs $ Business License $ Public Works Costs $ Processing Fee $ Other Costs $. Total Due $ Refundable Damage Deposit $ Damage Deposit is due: Balance of fees incurred are due: ... .._...tea. �.:.+.... Jd..-..tea... s.»...3M...... - a HERMOSA BEACH PIER 0 0 TV PLAYERS TENT VIP TENT O O 0 0 CONCESSIONS ROLL -OFF DUMPSTER BLEACHERS 4 FI 4 ■ MAIN COURT 0 0 PAUL MITCHELL INFLATABLE -111.- 0 - PLAYER BOX TV 0 0 TEAM/SPONSOR TENTS 0 0 INFLATABLE VOLLEYBALL 0 0 STAGE 0 0 0 0 1993 BUD 4 -MAN VOLLEYBALL TOUR STANDARD SITE LAYOUT SCALE: 1" = 20 ft. 0 = Waste Receptacles ❑DLDD❑ PORTAJOHNS THE STRAND Insurance Required: Yes x No Date Received Unless greater or lessor coverage is requested, applicant agrees to furnish the City of Hermosa beach evidence of $1 million, comprehensive general liability insurance in the form of a certificate, covering the entire period of this permit, naming the City of Hermosa Beach and its employees as additional insured. Expiration Date . Permittee waives claims against the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees, for fees or damages caused by, arising out of, or in any way connected with the exercise of this permit. APPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND TO MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION AND TO RETURN SAID PREMISES IN THE SAME CONDITION AS THEY WERE BEFORE SAID USE. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ALL FEES, CHARGES AND OTHER NECESSARY MATERIAL WILL BE PAID AND/OR FURNISHED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES AS MUTUALLY AGREED TO BY BOTH PARTIES. October 5, 1992 pa; R:•resentative Date Bryan art, Project Director Permit to be processed through City Council: Yes x No If YES, Council's decision: Application is invalid without the following signatures: Department of Community Date Resources Police Department Date Authorization Fire Department Date Authorization if Required Life Guard Authorization Date Needed on all Water Events . x.. ._�.....,., . -. ATTACHMENT "B" CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT(S) CONTRACT This contract is entered into on January 1, 1993, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between C. E. Sports and Entertainment (C. E. SPORTS), a Sporting Events Promoter, and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY), with regard to the AMERICAN BEACH VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE FOUR -MAN PRO BEACH VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT ON MAY 22 AND 23, 1993. FEES Event fee shall be $3,254. The $500 deposit will be applied toward the $3,254 permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the City. All predetermined costs fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the Tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the City. SECURITY The City of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the Tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one representative of C. E. Sports. C. E. Sports shall provide no less than ten security officers.. Said officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other Tournament staff. A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the Tournament for a pre -event briefing. The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of the City's alcohol ordinance. The City of Hermosa Beach shall provide Officers for the event as follows for each day of Tournament, 10:00 AM - 6:00 PM: 1 Sergeant 2 Officers or as many officers as deemed necessary by Public Safety Director. Cost of officers shall be assumed by C. E. Sports. CLEAN-UP C. E. Sports shall provide a professional maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the Tournament: . The Beach and Strand, from 8th Street to 15th Street. . Pier Avenue, from Strand to Monterey Avenue. The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the trash collected outside the City each day of the Tournament. All maintenance work is to be concluded by 8:00 PM each evening. C. E. Sports shall provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: . Beach (impacted area) . Strand (impacted area) . Hermosa Valley Greenbelt (impacted area) or additional trash receptacles as needed. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES C. E. Sports shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of Tournament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. INSURANCE C. E. Sports shall provide the City a Certificate of Insurance providing liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. C. E. Sports insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance ofthe contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to contribute. C. E. Sports agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of the event promotion firm/sponsor its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors; with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to event. ADVERTISING Signage regarding the CITY'S alcohol ordinance shall be required by C. E. Sports. City staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for posting. City of Hermosa Beach shall permit two street banners to be posted for Tournament. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of C. E. Sports. CITY shall permit C. E. Sports to display two large replicas of their product. City staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. C. E. Sports shall be required to make announcements informing spectators of the CITY'S alcoholic beverage ordinance as deemed necessary by Hermosa Beach Police. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by C. E. Sports to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of event promotion firm/sponsor. PARKING C. E. Sports shall be required to make announcements indicating 1) where there is, free parking and 2) that the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. SPECIAL EVENTS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events requested to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. If C. E. Sports desires any County services, they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by C. E. Sports. The CITY shall allow access to Tournament site for setup forty eight (48) hours prior to Tournament. The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue, Beach Drive to the Strand for Tournament staff and film equipment parking. At no time may event/promotion firm block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at anytime by the CITY. City staff shall inspect grandstand construction and authorize public access. The CITY shall allow C. E. Sports the opportunity to sell official concession items per certain conditions. No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted. All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID CONTRACT. MISCELLANEOUS C. E. SPORTS RESPONSIBILITIES C. E. Sports shall provide as many portable port -a -johns as determined necessary by City staff. C. E. Sports shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. C. E. Sports shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and personnel necessary for conducting such a Tournament. Event shall be conducted in compliance with City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances on file at the Department of Community Resources. CITYERMOSA :f ACH Ci orney Date Mayor Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES Director Date C. E. Sports and Entertainment President Date ;,--.- .._.. .....SMS. .-.,._.M.r..X._..L._...�:f� REVISED PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 1992 MEETING ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Peirce, Commissioners Blaco, Crecy, McCurdy, Reviczky APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: "To approve as submitted." Crecy/Peirce All Ayes PUBLIC COMMENT Harold Cohen: La Playita Curious about Prop A Funds; Wanted to know if the per capita allocation could be used for any open space purpose. Wanted to know if some of Prop A Funds could be used for the Biltmore site. Staff responded to Mr. Cohen's questions Gary Clark: 1076 - 10th Street Offered services of his two (2) 4 -wheelers to drag baseball field for Little League. 4 -MAN PROFESSIONAL VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT Motion: Staff report followed by a report by Bryan Stuart of CE Sports and Entertainment. Public comment: Howard Longacre asked the Commissioners if they think the children benefit from Budweiser sponsor on Beach. Asking if the connection between healthy sports activity and beer is intentional. Thinks if we are going to allow sponsors on the beach, alcohol should not be featured. Also thinks these events cause congestion. Thinks we never have shortage of people on beach on weekends. Wishes Commission would look at these events more carefully. "Approve tournament to be held on May 22-23, 1993 and forward to City Council for final. approval." Reviczky/Blaco All Ayes HERMOSA CONSERVANCY UPDATE Ben Erickson and Gary Clark reported on the progress of planning and fund raising for the Clark Field locker room building (see attached rendering). Stated that 1993 PRO VOLLEYBALL EVENTS MAY S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 '© 4 - MAN PRO C.E. SPORTS ® 4 - MAN 25 26 27 28 29 FlESTA DE 30 FlESTA DE PRO LAS AR TES LAS ARTES C.E. SPORTS 31 FlESTA DE LAS ARTES 1993 PRO VOLLEYBALL EVENTS JUNE PLEASE NOTE: NO VOLLEYBALL EVENTS PROPOSED FOR JULY, 1993 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1© PRO WOMEN WPVA 1a PRO WOMEN WPVA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 PLEASE NOTE: NO VOLLEYBALL EVENTS PROPOSED FOR JULY, 1993 1993 PRO VOLLEYBALL EVENTS AUGUST S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 SURF FESTIVAL 7 SURF FESTIVAL 8 SURF FESTIVAL 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ©7 MENS PRO TOURNEY e MENS PRO TOURNEY 0 MENS PRO TOURNEY 30 31 - Ty tern 5T nob WfULA.101 6Nt '2 I4 tib" ab C H-. / . 'mei . .5 — RcneWli MCP?* ro i G/ H (\r " 43& -pg e &s r vim at -sS - 1, Lsun, , -vircommuN o '. yi. rts '' F-6767- edit.) er 1 l y vil ! 16. • 4'10/00D f ge" d i 000f7, -TD-7-04 ao0 t3'i PLIAS gV / euz /ILL o 1I1c, z C0.5%S' t l s7%C.iL sr7bo 1.0(4- e -ow -pi s emcyas c.MhR65- Tw I c' W y F7 W 9" .41:so. 1To 7191 WW1% g 7] c.1, TDO J4 ilN YJ 7 oir /.2 W F;1bYvbS, sT7IFBF Weer i /NGunrcirTh7 ?pool � �-s o F frsoo s ou ar t� � 6 N .� pNb% \IP R6 cVdni IS mtILce vi fl y y N CRRb Go ' s EI7No`� ,... _1 wistt tiflw )G iswr ni..t'nS S,, m r b '1, z P...9.__Ejlej" c2 Emil mss G) v-6(4 F bT o w}lY« co N.srr(4rroNftc... cwmreha . -ups /s d OR 61)C 6/1 14rent)LI ANT CON -577 pN.E1 --TptuE hS w r' bas *re CO'J . eT iL f 7Li "` - 60N1sTnnil /(V Pbt7 —stiout18C 13y gic atil .1\)(3ipb-b-12. WITH Gpn 4s7714 RNs P6`1bU CO Pf)elL/ T7 Pit.l £ i fizorno`rg-, liur AR54 61:i1b1106- p0T1bC-_ L eiLay ii3'T71ING-(26560(4/W1 ricz, -Thus /NS{'oc.f ON. -nits is 19 VrAtt rmPo grn. rr 'NgiN17c.77040, m117.71 IoW RNs PIINeb cIfwu H1 yr 4 . ' sjil1L(.1O&) (A rn a mLn teWilifiK IS Y TIT .Sro N S b e . ,- t161Z TTS `'9C 6 (r W71FW( lti scr1497dst, eoNc&: ,o N SPL6IS1/Ve) f , , --rfir JNT6-g-'k6 77 J ,S61, 1DN1 ON -NCB .! MC December 2, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of December 15, 1992 REQUEST TO AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A SUPPLEMENTAL TO THE TEAMSTER UNION, LOCAL 911 MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING, GENERAL, SUPERVISORY, AND ADMINISTRATIVE BARGAINING UNITS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the attached supplementals to the Memoranda of Understanding between the City and the California Teamsters Public, Professional and Medical Employees' Union, Local 911, General, Supervisory, and Administrative Bargaining Units. Background: The current Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Teamster Union, Local 911 is for a two year term which began on September 1, 1991. There are three bargaining units represented by the Teamster Union, the General, Supervisory, and Administrative units. A provision of the MOU's required the City and Union to "meet and confer" regarding any increase in wages for the second year of the contract which began September 1, 1992. After meeting with representatives of the Union, it was mutually agreed, in recognition of the current fiscal condition of the City, there would be no Cost -of -Living increase for the second year of the contract. It was further agreed that, should the City approve a salary increase for any other employee group currently in negotiations, the parties would again negotiate regarding salaries. Analysis: The language expressed in the supplemental formalizes the agreement noted above and reads as follows: .r - Article 38 - Wage Rate Pursuant to Article 38(C), the City and Union have met and conferred regarding a wage increase for the period September 1, 1992 through August 31, 1993. The parties have agreed that there shall be no wage increase for the stated period. The parties further agree to meet and confer to establish a wage increase, if any, prior to the expiration of this agreement should the City negotiate any wage increase to another bargaining unit which is currently, as of the date of this supplemental, in contract negotiations. Respectfully submitted: Concur: fifkm Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager .4 December 7, 1992 ip 42( Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the City Council December 15, 1992 REQUEST FROM REDONDO BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND MARK CONTE PRODUCTIONS REGARDING 2ND ANNUAL SUPER BOWL MILE Recommendation It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council approve the attached request from The Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce and Mark Conte Productions to allow them to utilize Hermosa Avenue at 8th Street for approximately 20 minutes on Sunday, January 31, 1993 (for a one mile elite race) with the following conditions: . Certificate of insurance to be provided by the organizers. . Organizers to attend a pre -event meeting with a Hermosa Beach Police Commander. . Organizers to pay for an off-duty officer (2 hour minimum) for event. . Affected residents to be notified in writing (approved by Community Resources Department). . Radio communications with organizers to be provided for City staff. . Organizer's vehicles to be identified with placards. . Starting gun to be examined and operator briefed prior to race start by Hermosa Beach Police Officer. . Commercial sponsors, banners etc. to be approved by City. . Film permits, if any, to be approved by City. Background The attached request from the Super Bowl 10K Race in Redondo Beach asks that Hermosa Beach approve the use of Hermosa Avenue from 8th Street to Herondo for the start of the Elite Mile demonstration race. This invitational event is a showcase for world class milers who compete prior to the 10K as an exhibition for the race participants. Analysis This request was approved last year by the City Council and while there were some minor logistical difficulties with the first run, there were no substantial negative impacts associated with it. The City's "after action report" indicated that there were some 1 1G difficulties with communications and with anticipated volunteer assistance, however, staff feels confident that the requirements listed in the recommendation above will address those problems. With the minimal impact this activity has on the City (20 minutes) and the cooperation that these kind of efforts foster between the cities (i.e., the Hermosa Beach Triathlon bike leg traversed Redondo Beach and we borrow equipment from them for Public Works projects routinely), approval of the above would be in stride with maintaining cooperative relations with the City of Redondo Beach. FISCAL IMPACT: Direct costs (Police hours) to be billed by City. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter of request from Mr. Mark Conte, Race Director and map of race course. 2. Minutes from Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission meeting of November 19, 1992. Concur: J,01,432 Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager 2 Respectfully submitted, Mary C/Rooney, Director Co. u ty Resources Dept. October 8,-1992 Mary Rooney, Director Department of Community Resources City of Hermosa,Beach 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: Redondo Beach Super Bowl Sunday Mile Dear Mary: This is an official request from the Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce and Mark Conte Productions to gain approval for use of a portion of Hermosa Avenue in the City .of ,Hermosa Beach to facilitate the start. of ,a 2nd Annual Super Bowl Mile which is the opening event of: the:upcoming Redondo Beach'Super Bowl Sunday 10K Run/5K Walk. -,The event will take place on Sunday, January 31, 1993. - • ,•. . • \. As .with last year's event, the "Mile" will be an exclusive invitational one mile sprint race% ,We will invite 'twelve elite athletes, both men .and women, to compete in -this AI prestigious race..--- , . , • • • The straight away format we established last year provided a world class course which will finish in a _southerly direction at the 10K Run START banner on Harbor Drive -at the corner of Beryl- Street -in Redondo Beach. The race will ,finish -30 minutes prior to the start of the'10K run in front of the 10K parEicipants-and spectators. , - Of course, in order to have the event again like last year, we will need the assistance from the City of Hermosa Beach by allowing the event to start in the City of Hermosa Beach at 8th Street. We would utilize the west side of the median only for approximately 20 minutes beginning at 7:10a.m. and opening the street to traffic at 7:30a.m.-The Redondo Beach Police will close Harbor Drive at Herondo at 6:30a.m. The east bound lanes of Herondo will be closed for the 10K Run at 7:00 a.m. for the running of the Super Bowl Mile event and subsequent races. Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce 1215 N. Catalina Ave., Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Phone: 213/376-6911 Fax: 213/374-7373 Mark Conte Productions 212 Yacht Club Way, Suite D, Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Phone: 213/798-2488 Fax: 213/798-2577 • Ms. Mary Rooney October 8th, 1992 Page 2 The Mile event men's race will start at 7:20a.m. and the women will start 1 minute later with the races taking approximately 5 minutes to complete. The first half mile of the race will be.in Hermosa Beach which means our.course crew will be clearing your streets of traffic cones and Hermosa Avenue will be re -opened immediately following the race. _. - `) ;. We will include the City 'of Hermosa Beach as additionally insured on our Super Bowl Sunday Race policy. `-We will secure all arteries leading into the affected area on Hermosa Avenue with traffic cone. Hermosa Beach Police assistance at 8th Street to manage traffic at the start of the mile would be appreciated. We will provide personnel to manage all the logistics of the run and will plan the event in coordination with City staff and policies as deemed appropriate. We would like to start the race with a starting gun again this year and will certainly notify residents and businesses in the affected area by letter 10 days before the event.... In February 1992 I met with Commander Altfeld to discuss the "After Action Report" submitted by Officer Thomas Eckert. We will address the issues presented in that critique for this year's running of the Super Bowl Mile. Per the recommendations included on that report, I.will-invite Commander Altfeld or an appointed .representative 'of -the Hermosa Beach Police Department ,to participate in planning meetings for the 1993 event.., . Included is a map which details the street closure and a race application for your review. Should you have any questions I will be available at your convenience to_ discuss the matter. We appreciate your continued support. Mark Conte Race Director Enclosures Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce 1215 N. Catalina Ave., Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Phone: 213/376-6911 Fax: 2131374-7373 Mark Conte Productions 212 Yacht Club Way, Suite 0, Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Phone: 213/798-2488 Fax: 213,'798-257 1 8 s „ 8 -51-.mile Start E--� 8 Cf 7 st Y 7C#. X b S+. X b C . x N s ter. x 1 c+. x s+. x, x 3 s+. x 3 cr. g way Po'-toclZso (vox AAA0u*cert sfa.,d 1 x x X 4• x $ 6 St. 5t. 2 r+. SUPER BOWL MILE RACE Men Start 7:20 a.m. Women Start 7:22 a.m. Operations: Hermosa Ave. must be coned by 7:05 a.m. Harbor Drive must be coned immediately following closure of the street, approximately 6:30 a.m. All cones must be removed immediately following the last runner in the women's event. H eronci0 Sf. (90'H> Vact f OIC 6 lJa>/ 4/00' phe fa l S-ertc e Seryl 5T11-. they will be looking for corporate donations to complete project. REDONDO BEACH SUPERBOWL MILE Mark Conte addressed the Commission on this topic. Motion: "To approve the request from the Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce and Mark Conte Productions to allow them to utilize Hermosa Avenue at 8th Street for approximately 20 minutes on Sunday, January 31, 1993 per the conditions listed in the staff report and to forward to City Council for final approval." McCurdy/Crecy All Ayes 1993 SURF FESTIVAL Motion: "To approve the request from the International Surf Festival Committee to act as host City for the 1993 Surf Festival and to host the 1993 National Lifeguard Championships on August 6-7 and to forward to City Council for final approval." Blaco/McCurdy All Ayes Commissioner Crecy commented that a "Welcome Lifeguards" banner would be a nice touch. COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION - USE OF FACILITIES Motion: "To reinstate Commission liaison and to request quarterly reports about Foundation facility usage." McCurdy/Peirce All Ayes Motion: "To assign Chairperson Peirce as Commission liaison to the Foundation." Blaco/McCurdy All Ayes PUBLIC WORKS REPORT Director Charlie MacDonald reported on: (1) Irrigation projects (2) Pedestrian barrier at 8th St. & the Greenbelt (see attached reports) Commissioner Revcizky indicated that he would like the Commission to facilitate the efforts of the Public Works Department in getting parks CIP projects implemented (i.e. support requests for additional manpower) this fiscal year. Motion: "To create an aesthetically pleasing barrier (inside fencing) utilizing mature shrubs and a temporary fence ASAP." Reviczky/Crecy All Ayes DECEMBER MEETING DATE Minutes: Parks Commission - 2 - Nov. 19, 1992 December 7, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Regular Meeting of Dec. 15, 1992 INTERNATIONAL SURF FESTIVAL/NATIONAL LIFEGUARD COMPETITION Recommendation It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council approve the request from the International Surf Festival Committee to act as host City for the 1993 Surf Festival and to host the 1993 National Lifeguard Championships on August/16-7. y- 7 /4-4,/tea.- /o7`& Background This summer will mark the 31st year of the International Surf Festival. Paid for by the Daily Breeze newspaper and sponsored by the cities and Chambers of Commerce of Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach and Torrance, the Surf Festival features numerous community events (held at different beaches) including a Pier to Pier swim; the fishing derby; a volleyball tournament and sand castle building competition. LA County Lifeguards are also featured in competitions and lifesaving demonstrations. The lifeguard events are traditionally held at the host city beaches on Friday and Saturday nights. This host city function rotates between the beach cities on an annual basis (i.e., last year, Manhattan Beach was host City). This summer is Hermosa's turn in the rotation. An additional request has been made for 1993. The LA County Lifeguard Association has requested approval to hold the Life Saving National Championships in Hermosa Beach on the same weekend as the Surf Festival (attachment B). The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission recommended approval of this request at their November 19th meeting. Analysis As the Surf Festival is City -sponsored, we generally do not request formal approval for the event, however, with Hermosa Beach serving as host City and the addition of the National Lifeguard Championships, staff wanted to bring it to Council's attention. All expenses associated with the festival excluding staff costs are paid for by the Surf Festival Committee (funded by the Daily Breeze; and the majority of event logistics and operations are conducted by the Department of Beaches and Harbors staff. The 1 ii committee also provides liability insurance for the entire festival. Being the host City means that Hermosa Beach will add the night time lifeguard events to our usual list of events (fishing derby, Pier to Pier swim, lifeguard dorey race) which will involve the delivery of search lights, bleachers and staging to the Pier and on the beach north of the Pier; will require some reserved parking for competitors and VIPs and will attract approximately 2,000 spectators to Hermosa Beach on Friday and Saturday nights. With the addition of the National Lifeguard finals, we can expect some increase in day time attendance and additional parking needs. It is not yet determined whether or not this event will be commercially sponsored. If it is, staff will return to the Commission and Council with a report and recommendation regarding fees and logistics. The addition of the National Championships will add a tremendous spark to the Surf Festival as a whole to which Hermosa Beach will be the primary beneficiary. Lifeguards have already been busy working with the Chamber of Commerce to secure lodging in the City for the expected 1,000 competitors. It is anticipated that their events will impact the businesses downtown in a positive way without placing an undue burden on the residents. Hosting this event which spotlights life saving personnel from all over the country will be an honor for the Surf Festival and for the City of Hermosa Beach. Con Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager 2 Respe ly submitted, Mar . :+.oney, Director Co unity Resources Dept. ATTACHMENT "B" I F EGUARI) Los Angeles County Lifeguard Association "Dedicated to Life Saving" P.Q. Box 5727, Santa Monica, California 90405-5727 October 13, 1992 Mary Rooney Community Resources Hermosa Beach City Hall LRCM Dear Mary: Ken Johnson has advised me to contact you concerning necessary approvals from the City of Hermosa Beach for the United States Surf Life Saving National Championships in 1993. The Los Angeles County Chapter (LACOLA) has received approval from the National organization to stage the annual event in Los Angeles County. As you may know, Los Angeles County lifeguards have won the Nationals for the past six consecutive years and we are about defending our title on home turf. The Nationals will be held in conjunction with the Daily Breeze International Surf Festival August 5-8, 1993. Since the Surf Festival's night events are scheduled for Hermosa Beach this year, we would like to stage the Nationals there, also, during the days. National competition will include Junior Lifeguard events on Thursday August 5th, and professional lifeguard events on Friday and Saturday August 6th and 7th. National competitors will be free to compete in Surf Festival events if they wish. Competitors will be arriving from all over the United States and staying at local hotels. We expect as many as 1000 to compete in the three-day national event. I would like to meet with you as soon as possible to discuss the approvals necessary from the City and to work out some of the details. Please call me at (310) 577-5705 so we can work out a meeting date. Sincerely, Ira Grub Executive Director Los Angeles County Lifeguard Association ** TOTAL PAGE.0O1 ** they will be looking for corporate_donations to complete project. REDONDO BEACH SUPERBOWL MILE Mark Conte addressed the Commission on this topic. Motion: "To approve the request from the Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce and Mark Conte Productions to allow them to utilize Hermosa Avenue at 8th Street for approximately 20 minutes on Sunday, January 31, 1993 per the conditions listed in the staff report and to forward to City Council for final approval." McCurdy/Crecy All Ayes 1993 SURF FESTIVAL Motion: "To approve the request from the International Surf Festival Committee to act as host City for the 1993 Surf Festival and to host the 1993 National Lifeguard Championships on August 6-7 and to forward to City Council for final approval." Blaco/McCurdy All Ayes Commissioner Crecy commented that a "Welcome Lifeguards" banner would be a nice touch. COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION USE OF FACILITIES Motion: "To reinstate Commission liaison and to request quarterly reports about Foundation facility usage." McCurdy/Peirce All Ayes Motion: "To assign Chairperson Peirce as Commission liaison to the Foundation." Blaco/McCurdy All Ayes PUBLIC WORKS REPORT Director Charlie MacDonald reported on: (1) Irrigation projects (2) Pedestrian barrier at 8th St. & the Greenbelt (see attached reports) Commissioner Revcizky indicated that he would like the Commission to facilitate the efforts of the Public Works Department in getting parks CIP projects implemented (i.e. support requests for additional manpower) this fiscal year. Motion: "To create an aesthetically pleasing barrier (inside fencing) utilizing mature shrubs and a temporary fence ASAP." Reviczky/Crecy All Ayes DECEMBER MEETING DATE Minutes: Parks Commission — 2 — Nov. 19, 1992 December 7, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the City Council December 15, 1992 PROJECT TOUCH LEASE RENEWAL AGREEMENT (ROOM C) RECOMMENDATION The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff recommend that City Council approve the lease agreement between the City and Project Touch for Room C in the Community Center and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached lease. BACKGROUND Project Touch presently leases Room C, Room 11 and 3 in the Community Center. They have been tenants in the Center since October, 1979. They have served Hermosa, Redondo and Manhattan Beach city's high risk youth and their families for 16 years. Project Touch is a juvenile diversion program whose services include social and educational enrichment, counseling, meals, wilderness challenge camping and stepteen/stepfamily groups. ANALYSIS The lease space for Room C is 312 sq. ft. with a monthly rental of $262. ($.84 sq. ft.) The attached lease conforms to the present square footage rental policy (approved by the Commission January 24, 1990 and by City Council March 13, 1990) with all other conditions of the former lease remaining the same. Their residency in the Community Center has been of great value in addressing a vital social service function for Hermosa Beach. Fiscal Impact: $3,222 Estimated annual revenue Concu Mar. T. 'ooney, Director Comunity.Resources Dept. Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager 1 Respectfully submitted, Marsha Ernst Administrative Aide Community Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Director Finance Dept. lj HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 1st day of January 19 93 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and PROJECT TOUCH (Lessee). A. RECITALS: 7 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of one (1) year commencing on the 1st day of January ,1993 , and ending on the 31st day of December ,19 93 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room C (312 sq. ft.) 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent accord- ing to the following schedule: January 1, 1993 thru June 30, 1993: $.84 per sq. ft. $262 per month. Lease rate shall be according to policy in effect at that time. Payable on the first day of the month., If this lease •commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of the following month. 1 .114..4."La..x .x. -• r ] o, tom, :..�.,,,�w.w.v 3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings,__floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises except such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such signs shall be in accordance with the policy established by the Lessor. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Any lawful purpose of Project Touch ,and for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in viola- tion of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted -by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School. District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at alltimes during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of _change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; "(3) Insurance •is primary to that of the Additional - .Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause.'•• WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any di- rect or indirect act or any omission of the lessee, its of- ficers, agents and employees arising out of the lessee's use of aid premises. The Lessee, at its own cost, expense and risk shall defend any and all actions, suits or other pro- ceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 3 10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. • 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be'made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal- ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR:_ CITY.OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL ' • 1315 'VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: Project Touch 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa. Beach, CA 90254 Attn: Julie Dorr Feys Any notices so given pursuant to theprovisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit: thereof in the United States mail. 14. .ATTORNEYS FEES., The parties agree that inthe event any action is instituted concerning any of theprovisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. . SUCCESSORS.: Subject,to prior provisions, this _lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first hereinabove set forth. ATTEST: APPRO -+ AS TO FORM DATE: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 5 PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF THURSDAY, OCTOBER 15, 1992 MEETING ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Staff: Chairperson Peirce, Commissioners Crecy, McCurdy, Reviczky Commissioner Blaco Rooney, McDonald APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular Meeting of Thursday September 17, 1992 Motion: "To approve as submitted." Crecy/McCurdy All Ayes PROJECT TOUCH LEASE AGREEMENT Motion: "To approve lease renewal for Room C in the Community Center." McCurdy/Reviczky All Ayes THEATRE RENTAL FEE REDUCTION: SOUTH BAY UNION HIGH SCHOOL INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM GRADUATION Motion: "To approve fee reduction and charge $$0.00 to the organization for their June 22, 1993 Graduation." Crecy/McCurdy All Ayes AMERICAN VETERAN'S MEMORIAL Motion: "To approve staff recommendation to schedule a meeting with Ken Marks and the subcommittee to plan and raise funds for a Hermosa Beach Veterans Memorial." Peirce/Reviczky All Ayes Note: First meeting is tentatively scheduled for Veterans Day at 6:00 p.m. in the Community Center. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS FROM CIP # 92-506 Motion: "To adopt List A from the analysis with the addition of a $5,000 appropriation for automated basketball standards for the gymnasium." Reviczky/Crecy All Ayes December 2, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the City Council December 15, 1992 FRANCHISE RENEWAL TIMELINE 'Recommendation It is recommended by the Cable Television Advisory Board and staff that Council approve the attached timeline and procedures for the Franchise renewal process as adopted by the Cable Television Advisory Board. Background With the receipt of the proposal for renewal from MultiVision and the prospect of a reimbursement agreement, the Cable TV Board is ready to proceed with Franchise negotiations. The attached timeline and procedures listed in the analysis below were adopted by the Board at their December 7, 1992 meeting. Analysis While Council has approved a timeline in the past, the exit of the Cable TV Coordinator and shift in Council direction to the Board necessitated a revision of the plan. The attached timeline targets a public hearing at the Board level in April, 1993 and at the City Council by May, 1993 which will accommodate public hearing requirements (Per the Cable TV Act) and will allow the City a window of time for revisions prior to the scheduled October 10, 1993 expiration. PROCEDURES (1) The Board will retain a negotiation subcommittee of two (2) who will meet to discuss the specifics of the proposal with MultiVision and will report back to the Board at the regularly scheduled meetings. (Board Members Tollefsen and Acosta) (2) A second subcommittee of two (2) is established as a community outreach committee, responsible to visit community groups/organizations to assess their needs related to cable television and their past experiences with the operator's performance. As with the above, this subcommittee would report to the Board at their regularly scheduled meetings. (Board Members Learned and Reimer) (3) A Board Member (Board Member Schweitzer) is assigned to work with staff in obtaining information relevant to the operator's past performance including complaint logs, audits and actions of prior Boards. 1 ik r (4) The City Attorney will provide professional consultation services to the Board and retain primary responsibility for preparing the proposal for renewal on behalf of the City. This would include attendance at Board meetings and the drafting of and review proposal. If it is the City Attorney's and/or Board's recommendation to secure technical or professional consultation services, these services can be contracted for separately. (5) The Board will request input from residents via the City's recreation brochure/newsletter scheduled for distribution at the end of January. The subcommittee formats and procedures as listed above would accommodate increased public input; an efficient negotiating approach and a link with the public throughout the process. The dual Hearings at the Commission and Council levels would serve to add to the public input opportunities and would enable the Board to iron out problems if they arise prior to Council's review of the proposal. Other alternatives available to Council include: . Assign a Councilmember or Council subcommittee to work with the Board directly during negotiations with MultiVision. . Amend the timeline as submitted. . Request additional information. Fiscal impact: All direct costs associated with the process external of City staff time to be reimbursed per the agreement with MultiVision. ;ocur Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager 2 Respectfully submitted, Mar Co C�•oney, Director un y Resources Department CABLE TV FRANCHISE RENEWAL TIMELINE: AS OF 12/3/92 JANUARY MEETING : MONDAY, JANUARY 11 Objectives: Proposal Subcommittee: Review of technical standards proposed / desired Community Subcommittee: Strategy for Community outreach Past Performance of Cable Operator: Report on previous audits / complaint logs FEBRUARY MEETING: MONDAY, FEBRUARY 1. Objectives: Proposal Subcommittee: Review of financial terms/City benefits of agreement proposed/desired Community Subcommittee: Community needs/feedback report (areas for further study) Past Performance: Compliance review / financial audit MARCH MEETING: MONDAY, MARCH 1 Objectives: Proposal Subcommittee: Review of City requirements / auditing / monitoring / terms of lease agreement Community Subcommittee: Report on publicity for Hearing in April Past Performance: Evaluation statement of last franchise period MARCH WORKSHOP MEETING: MONDAY, MARCH 15 (ADDITIONAL ON MARCH MEETING IF NEC) Objectives: Proposal Subcommittee to present final proposal to the Board for review. Opportunity for revisions / deletions and additions. Board to select items of importance to the community for purposes of the Hearing scheduled for April 5. APRIL MEETING: MONDAY, APRIL 5 Objective: To provide an opportunity for public input prior to the City Council public hearing in March. If revisions are determined to be necessary after the public input process is complete, an additional meeting may be scheduled in April. MAY 11 OR MAY 25: PUBLIC HEARING AT CITY COUNCIL Objective: To present a draft proposal to the City Council; provide another opportunity for public input and to determine if revisions will be necessary. Subsequent to Council's review and potential approval, this agreement will be introduced as an ordinance and put into effect at the termination of the Franchise agreement in October. SUBSEQUENT BOARD MEETINGS AND TOPICS WILL BE DETERMINED AFTER THE COUNCIL HEARING(S). Decembe 21, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council kOtr ' -frO 4 Regular Meeting of December 15, 1992 CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE RENEWAL EXPENSE AGREEMENT Recommendation It is recommended by the Cable Television Advisory Board and staff that Council authorize the City Manager to sign an agreement with MultiVision (City Attorney will have the agreement, Attachment A, available at Tuesday's Council meeting) that will provide up to $12,000 to the City for Franchise renewal expenses. Background At the August 11, 1992 meeting, Council authorized the City Attorney to work with the Cable Television Advisory Board on a number of items related to Franchise renewal. One of the directions by Council to the City Attorney was to negotiate an agreement with MultiVision on behalf of the City that would provide for reimbursement to the City for renewal related expenses. At the November 2 Cable Television Advisory Board meeting, staff presented a report to the Board Members (Attachment B) outlining recommendations for an agreement with MultiVision for reimbursement. At that time, the Board selected a subcommittee of Chairperson Tollefsen and Board Member Acosta to review the proposal that had been presented to the Board by MultiVision and to work with the City Attorney and staff to draft an agreement with MultiVision for reimbursement. The subcommittee consulted with the City Attorney and requested that he submit a counter proposal to MultiVision (Attachment C). Analysis The spirit of the new proposal submitted to MultiVision by the City Attorney was to insure that the City was reimbursed for all direct costs associated with the renewal without a ceiling clause as was proposed by MultiVision. Don Granger of MultiVision responded to the City's proposal on November 24 over the telephone. Mr. Granger indicated that MultiVision would not agree to the terms as presented in Attachment C but would raise their initial ceiling offer of $10,000 to $12,000 for reimbursement of renewal expenses. The Cable TV Advisory Board recommended approval of MultiVision's counter proposal at their December 7, 1992 Board meeting. This 1 11 approval was made in recognition of the fact that it is in the best interests of the City to get into the Franchise renewal process as early as possible to allow the maximum time for the Board to assess the operator's performance and community needs. As the Board has elected to approach renewal with an informal process (and will be benefiting from the Manhattan Beach renewal to be completed in the near future), staff would recommend accepting the offer of $12,000 with the understanding that should additional funds be required that these funds could be negotiated as part of the new Franchise agreement and/or by Council resolution. Clearly, it is difficult for the Board and staff to find a comfort level with renewal expenses without specific knowledge of what the community will want from this process; how smoothly negotiations will proceed; and what may occur at the City Council level. MultiVision has similar concerns in electing to enter into an agreement without a dollar ceiling. By accepting the $12,000 offer, the City would put the wheels in motion for the renewal process which would assist us greatly in being able to gain a better understanding of the level of agreement between the two parties. With this reimbursement agreement and the adopted timeline and procedures for renewal, the Cable Television Advisory Board will be equipped to proceed with their assignment in an efficient and positive manner so that a Cable TV Franchise agreement that is in the best interests of the community can be drafted prior to the scheduled October, 1993 expiration date. Other alternatives available to the Council include: Request that Council adopt a resolution, setting a uniform fee for Cable Franchise applications: As with other City services such as Conditional Use Permits, Film Permits and User Fees, the City would calculate a fee based on staff time and other City costs for Franchise applications. Provisions for direct costs associated with applications (i.e. consultation fees) could be additional to the calculated staff hours. While it would appear that this approach would place the City in a position of control with regards to this issue, it would not only delay the initiation of serious negotiations further but it may also change the tone of negotiations from informal to a more formal one. Recommend that Council appropriate funds for the renewal: From previous Council actions, it would seem that funds in this range would not be available to the Board, however, the Council could elect to pay for all of the expenses. It would be presumed then, that the City would negotiate reimbursement with MultiVision along with other items at the time of renewal. As MultiVision is currently agreeable to the $12,000 figure and with the knowledge that additional requirements (if necessary) 2 can still be addressed in the renewal agreement (or by a subsequent Council resolution), it would be prudent to accept MultiVision's offer in order to expedite the renewal process. Fiscal Impact: Revenue: $12,000 to pay for direct costs as billed to the City no net gain or loss to the City. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Agreement (Attachment A) 2. Staff Report, November 2nd (Attachment B) 3. City Attorney counter proposal (Attachment C) Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Respectfully submitted, Mary Com ney ity Resources Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Director Finance Dept. ATTACHMENT "B" October 28, 1992 Chairperson and Members of the Regular Meeting of Cable Television Advisory Board November 2, 1992 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT/CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE RENEWAL Recommendation It is recommended by the City Attorney and staff that the Board request approval from City Council for the following: 1) An agreement to be drafted by the City Attorney for reimbursement from MultiVision to the City for Franchise renewal related expenses containing the language indicated in Attachment A and the revisions as listed in the analysis below. 2) Authorization to spend up to $4,000 for City Attorney hours related to Franchise renewal. 3) Authorization to spend up to $4,000 for consultation services related to Franchise renewal. Background At the August 3, 1992 meeting, the Board authorized the City Attorney and staff to negotiate an agreement with MultiVision to secure their commitment to pay the City for direct costs associated with Franchise renewal. Staff met with Don Granger of MultiVision on October 1, 1992. Subsequent to this meeting, Mr. Granger submitted a proposed agreement to the City (attachment B) that would place $5,000 in an account for the City to be used for Franchise renewal related expenditures. They also offered a ceiling on expenditures of $10,000 and requested that City staff time not be considered a reimbursable expense. Analysis In response to MultiVision's proposed agreement, staff met with the City Attorney and requested that the following revisions be made in order to 'better protect the interests of the City: a) Request reimbursement for direct costs associated with the former Cable TV Coordinator that were dedicated to Franchise renewal (approximately $4,000): While the clerical and Community Resources Director salaries would be an expense borne by the City regardless of the renewal process, the Cable TV Coordinator's salary would not. While the Director's salary does justifiably represent an opportunity cost to the City (i.e., hours dedicated to the renewal process could be used for other City projects), there is no additional direct cost to the general fund. In the case of the Cable TV Coordinator (whose duties were strictly related to Cable TV), renewal -related hours should be reimbursed by MultiVision. This expense which has already been absorbed by the City would raise MultiVision's proposed $10,000 ceiling to $12,000. b) Clarify that City Attorney hours would be reimbursable: Staff felt it would be important to clarify that the City Attorney hours would not be exempted from reimbursement as staff hours. Again, the City Attorney costs represent a direct cost to the City as the hours dedicated to Franchise renewal have and will be billed to the City. c) Place a re -opener clause: While the $12,000 ceiling may be sufficient to complete the renewal process, as the amount significantly differs from the Board's original request, staff wanted to allow for renegotiation should the process exceed the $12,000 limit. As the Board will be benefiting from the Manhattan Beach renewal process and has opted to approach renewal in an informal way, it would seem that direct expenditures on behalf of this process may be lessened from the level anticipated by the. Board earlier in the year. With approval from the City Council for the above, the Cable TV Board and staff will be able to initiate the renewal process quickly and to address areas of concern in Hermosa Beach prior to the scheduled Franchise expiration in October, 1993. Other alternatives available to the Commission include: . Amend or reject the proposal for reimbursement. . Adjust the recommended allocations for attorney and consultation services. . Request additional information. Respectfully submitted, Mary C/oney, Director Com ni y Resources Dept. 2 WILLIAM B. 6ARR CHARLES VOBE CONNIE CCOKE sAN[IIFFR JAMES DUFF MURPI-IT ROGER w. sFRINGER EOWAP.O w. LEE HERIBERTO F. UTAZ JANICE R. MIVAHIRA BETH S. BEROMAN LAW OFFICES OLIVER, BARR & VOSE A PROr£SSIONAI- CORPORATION 1000 SUNSET BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 (213) 250-3045 MEMORANDUM ATTACHMENT "A" TO: Hermosa Beach Cable Television Advisory Board Cki FROM: harles S. Vose, City Attorney DATE: October 28, 1992 RE: Cable Television Franchise Renewal TELECOPIER (2131 4112.0336 The City of Hermosa Beach has recently received a proposal from MultiVision regarding expenses/reimbursement for the cable television franchise renewal process. The Advisory Board should make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the acceptance or rejection of this proposal. Should the Board wish to recommend approval, I suggest that the reimbursement policy be altered to a limited degree. "Reasonable costs and expenses" should be defined to include -all attorney fees, consultant fees, publication and public hearing notices or advertising costs and other actual out of pocket costs and disbursements incurred by the City relating to the renewal process. I would also suggest that a breakdown of reimbursable costs incurred to date be detailed and agreed to in advance. Such a breakdown can be used as a guideline for future reimbursement. MultiVision and the City of Hermosa Beach should also retain the right to mutually agree to revise the maximum commitment amount due to changes in circumstances. obviously the 1992 Federal Legislation will be applicable to this process and reference to the 1984 Act should be eliminated in any proposal. I am pleased to further respond to any questions which may arise or provide additional documentation where required. Csv: ilf cc: Rick Ferrin, City Manager Mary Rooney, Director of Community Resources Department 11641 ATTACHMENT "B" „,/ MultiVision October 16, 1992 Ms. Mary Rooney Community Resources Director City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach CA 90254 RE: Expense Reimbursement/Cable Television Franchise Renewal Dear Mary, As a follow-up to our meeting with you and Charles Vose, Hermosa Beach City Attorney, I have outlined herein our commitment, as a franchised provider of cable television service for Hermosa Beach, to pay to the City of Hermosa Beach amounts representing the City's reasonable out of pocket costs and expenses incurred in connection with concluding the cable television franchise renewal on terms mutually agreeable to the city and MultiVision. As you know, we look forward to working with the City on the Franchise renewal process and although we have reserved the formal renewal rights under the Federal Cable Act of 1984, we welcome the opportunity to proceed and conclude our renewal negotiations in the current positive, informal manner existing between the City and MultiVision. We understand that the completion of the renewal may involve review by the City's outside legal counsel and other expenses described below, and are willing to reimburse the City for those reasonable expenses associated with the renewal process itself (assuming the renewal is ultimately agreeable), as a special accommodation to the City and in view of its present budgetary constraints. MultiVision agrees to reimburse the City, in an amount not to exceed Ten -Thousand Dollars. ($10,000) for its actual, reasonable costs and expenses incidental to the renewal of the cable television franchise, to the extent such expenses are for outside legal counsel or consultants, any publication of the renewal ordinance or resolution required by law, and other actual out of pocket costs and disbursements by the City directly for completing the Cable Television Franchise renewal, as well as any incidental costs or premiums paid by the franchisee to initiate a performance bond or insurance certificate if required by the City in conn ion with the renewal. This commitment is offered provided that (i) the scope of reimbursement es not include internal staff time or overhead, costs of the City, as they are covered by the e. isting franchise fees paid to the City by MultiVision as we discussed; (ii) the franchisee does not assume responsibility for City expenses to the extent that they exceed this $10,000 commitment; (iii) a renewal of the franchise is agreed to by the City and MultiVision. MultiVision Cable TV 3041 East lliraloma Avenue Anaheim. CA 92806 714.632-9222 DG232.1u City of Hermosa Beach October 16, 1992 Page 2 To substantiate our good faith intentions for the franchise renewal process, and further our cooperative working relationship with the City, we are agreeable to advancing a Five -thousand Dollar ($5,000) deposit to the City upon the demand of the City, representing 50% of our maximum total cost reimbursement commitment to the City, for use in connection with the renewal related expenses specified above. Upon the City's grant and our acceptance of the renewed cable television franchise, we understand the City will (i) return to us promptly the unexpended portion, if any, of our $5,000 advance deposit; (ii) retain as your own the amount of the deposit representing actual expenses incurred as specified above, up to the full amount of the $5,000 deposit; and (iii) receive prompt payment from us of any excess of such specified expenses over the $5,000 deposit amount, up to the $10,000 total commitment amount, provided that the City gives us an itemized listing of the actual expenses incurred including the party receiving payment, the amount and the general nature of each expense. The foregoing commitment to pay expense reimbursements and to provide the advance deposit is made as a special accommodation to the City, although we understand that a City's legal fees and other renewal expenses are not generally chargeable to the franchisee under the 1984 Cable Act. This will confirm our understanding and discussion with you and Mr. Vose to the effect that, as a significant financial contribution and demonstration of our good faith the foregoing commitment is made and will be given credit as part and parcel of the overall package of benefits to be negotiated for the City and community, and as an integral part of the overall terms and conditions of the franchise renewal now in negotiation. To indicate the City's acceptance of the terms of commitment stated above, please return a copy to me with an authorized signature on the City's behalf. We look forward to continuing fruitful discussions with the City's representatives and the Cable Advisory Board, and to a successful franchise renewal providing the foundation for ongoing high quality cable television services for the Hermosa Beach community in the years to come. Sincerely, rIst°f-47/ Donald R. Granger Regional Vice President : ean cc: Charles Vose, City of Hermosa Beach Chantal Hargis, MultiVison Richard Hainbach, MultiVision Reviewed and Accepted: for City of Hermosa Beach/Title DG232.1tr WILLIAM B. BARR CHARLES S. VOSE CONNIE COOKE SANDIFER JAMES DUFF MURPHY ROGER W. SPRINGER EDWARD W. LEE HERIBERTO F. DIAZ JANICE R. MIYAHIRA BETH S. BERGMAN LAW OFFICES OLIVER, BARR & VOSE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1000 SUNSET BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 (213) 250-3043 November 16, 1992 Mr. Donald R. Granger Regional Vice President MultiVision Cable TV 3041 East Miraloma Avenue Anaheim, CA 92806 ATTACHMENT "C" CoPY Re: Expense Reimbursement/Cable Television Franchise Renewal, Hermosa Beach Dear Mr. Granger: TELECOPIER (213) 482-5336 The City has recently received and reviewed your proposal for expense reimbursement with respect to the City's obligations in the franchise renewal process. The City cannot agree to the term suggested in your October 16, 1992 correspondence. As previously discussed, it is not the City's intention to create franchise requirements which exceed the acceptable standards in surrounding communities. However, based upon the recent franchise proposal submitted by MultiVision and the importance of coordinating with the City of Manhattan Beach, the renewal expenses may exceed the limitations included in your proposal. Therefore, the City of Hermosa Beach is willing to accept a commitment for reasonable cost and expenses incurred in the renewal of the cable television franchise which include the following: 1. $10,000 deposit to the City for use in connection with the renewal related expenses. 2. The scope of expenses will not include full time internal city personnel time or related overhead costs. 3. The City will provide MultiVision with an on-going breakdown of the renewal expenses and MultiVision will be required to reimburse the City for all OLIVER, BARR & VOSE Mr. Donald R. Granger November 16, 1992 Page 2. renewal expenses exceeding the $10,000 figure at the time that the renewal of franchise is granted by the City to MultiVision. 4. Upon the granting and acceptance by MultiVision of the renewal franchise, any unexpended portion of the $10,000 advance deposit will be returned to MultiVision. It is our sincere hope that the franchise renewal procedure can be expedited in an efficient and cost saving manner. We would anticipate using the experience from other municipalities in helping to reduce these costs. However, any franchise renewal must meet acceptable standards which are consistent with the demands in the surrounding area. In order to proceed with the franchise renewal process, we need to receive your response to this letter on or before Tuesday, November 24, 1992. Due to on going budgetary difficulties, the City of Hermosa Beach cannot effectively process your renewal request until such time as a reimbursement agreement has been finalized. Should you have further questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Mary Rooney at the City of Hermosa Beach or myself. Very truly yours, cLiz," Ire Charles S. Vose of OLIVER, BARR & VOSE CSV:ilf cc Mary,Rooney,_'City, of HermosaBeach.`: 12681 WILLIAM B. BARR CHARLES S. VOSE CONNIE COOKE SANDIFER JAMES DUFF MURPHY ROGER W. SPRINGER EDWARD W. LEE HERIBERTO F. DIAZ JANICE R. MIYAHIRA BETH S. BERGMAN LAW OFFICES OLIVER, BARR & VOSE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1000 SUNSET BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 (213) 250-3043 December 16, 1992 Mr. Donald R. Granger Regional Vice President MultiVision Cable TV 3041 East Miraloma Avenue Anaheim, CA 92806 TELECOPIER (213) 482-5336 CRAFT Re: Expense Reimbursement/Cable Television Franchise Renewal, Hermosa Beach Dear Mr. Granger: The City has completed its review of your proposal for expense reimbursement with respect to the City's obligations in the franchise renewal process. As previously discussed, it is not the City's intention to create franchise requirements which exceed the acceptable standards in surrounding communities. Therefore, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach is willing to accept a commitment for reasonable cost and expenses incurred in the renewal of the cable television franchise upon the following terms: 1. $5,000 deposit to the City for use in connection with the renewal related expenses. 2. The scope of expenses will not include full time internal city personnel time or related overhead costs. E,j- l °s oL Ar r wci fWe tei nc�.drCr Atl�ls1,v h'.7 KAr ms txhs h,'1- "A'. 3. The City will provide MultiVision with an on-going breakdown of the renewal expenses and MultiVision will be required to reimburse the City for all renewal expenses exceeding the $5,000 deposit at the time that the renewal of franchise is granted by the City to MultiVision, up to a maximum of $12,000. The payment of any renewal related expenses in excess of this $12,000 maximum will be negotiated in good faith between the parties. 1-(L) OLIVER, BARR & VOSE r Mr. Donald R. Granger November 16, 1992 Page 2. 4. Upon the granting and acceptance by MultiVision of the renewal franchise, any unexpended portion of the deposit will be returned to MultiVision. In order to proceed with the franchise renewal process, we need to receive your agreement to these terms on or before Tuesday, December 29, 1992. Due to on going budgetary difficulties, the City of Hermosa Beach cannot effectively process your renewal request until such time as a reimbursement agreement has been finalized. Very truly yours, Charles S. Vose of OLIVER, BARR & VOSE Reviewed and Accepted: Donald R. Granger MultiVision Cable TV CSV:ilf cc: Mary Rooney, City of Hermosa Beach 12 681 December 9, 1992 HonorableM or and Members of the Herm Beach City Council /A -/ S 7?--- City Y City Council Meeting of December 15, 1992 RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE DONATION OF TEN UNCLAIMED BICYCLES IN THE POSSESSION OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council authorize the donation of 10 unclaimed bicycles for. distribution to needy children for Christmas. Background: Each year a large number of unclaimed bicycles come into the possession of the Police Department. The disposition of this unclaimed property is governed by section 21-16.1 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. This section requires that the bicycles be held for a minimum of three months and then sold at public auction if they remain unclaimed. Analysis: Several Officers of the Police Department have suggested that ten (10) of these unclaimed bicycles be donated to the children of needy families as Christmas presents from the City of Hermosa Beach. Beach Cities Cycle, the shop that donates the use of bicycles for our beach patrol each year, has offered to furnish the labor and parts necessary to repair and recondition the bicycles at no cost. Preliminary plans call for the donation of three (3) of the bicycles through Our Lady of Guadelupe Church and seven (7) through the local welfare office. These organizations will identify those in need and members of the Police Department will assist in presenting the bicycles to the children. Staff believes that this is an excellent opportunity for the City and the Police Department to demonstrate to the community that we care about our citizens and it will brighten the lives of some children that may have an otherwise bleak Christmas. Steve Wisniewski, Director of Public Safety Conyr: Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager 1m f;16*.(26—gs‘P".53--e") December 2, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of December 15, 1992 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION, OFFICERS' AND SERGEANTS' BARGAINING UNIT Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Hermosa Beach Police Officers' Association, Officers' and Sergeants' Bargaining Unit for the period March 1, 1992 through February 28, 1992. Background: The previous Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Police Officers' Association, Officers' and Sergeants' Bargaining Unit expired February 29, 1992. Since the City was in the process of selecting a new City Manager at the time the MOU expired, the City and Association mutually agreed to delay the start of negotiations toward a successor MOU until that selection process was completed. The negotiated successor MOU establishes the wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment for the period March 1, 1992 through February 28, 1993. Analysis: Negotiated changes to the MOU include the following: 1. No Cost -of -Living increase in base salary; 2. An amendment of the City's contract with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) to include a provision allowing employees to purchase up to four (4) years of service credit for previous military service. Cost: The employee is responsible for the costs associated with the purchase of the additional credit. This cost could be in excess of $5,000 per year purchased. Any additional cost to the City will be actuarially determined and included in the City's future contribution rate. 3. Approval of the Police Officers' Association assuming the administration of their Long Term Disability (LTD) insurance plan. In lieu of the City paying $14.40/employee/month in premium costs, the base salary range for Officers and Sergeants will be increased $20.00/mo. Cost: $3,081/year (includes additional PERS costs) 4. Modification of the current bereavement leave policy to allow the Public Safety Director to authorize one additional shift of leave in the event the employee is required to travel extended 12, a •••••°' �.t.. .�___ distances. Previous language limited additional shift for "out-of-state" death. A copy of the Memorandum of Understanding is available for review in the Personnel office. Respectfully submitted: Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager December 2, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of December 15, 1992 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION, COMMANDERS' BARGAINING UNIT Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Hermosa Beach Police Officers' Association, Commanders' Bargaining Unit for the period March 1, 1992 through February 28, 1992. Background: The previous Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Police Officers' Association, Commanders' Bargaining Unit expired February 29, 1992. Since the City was in the process of selecting a new City Manager - at the time the MOU expired, the City and Association mutually agreed to delay the start of negotiations toward a successor MOU until that selection process was completed. The negotiated successor MOU establishes the wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment for the period March 1, 1992 through February 28, 1993. Analysis: Negotiated changes to the MOU include the following: 1. No Cost -of -Living increase in base salary; 2. Increase in the annual Management Leave allowance from 50 hours per year to 60 hours per year. In lieu of Commanders earn- ing additional "comp" time for working on a holiday (which can be converted to cash), now holiday hours worked will be added to the management leave bank (which has no cash value and must be used in the year earned). 3. An amendment of the City's contract with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) to include a provision allowing employees to purchase up to four (4) years of service credit for previous military service. Cost: The employee is responsible for the costs associated with the purchase of the additional credit.. This cost could be in excess of $5,000 per year purchased. Any additional cost to the City will be actuarially determined and included in the City's future contribution rate. 4. Approval of the Police Officers Association assuming the ad- ministration of their Long Term Disability (LTD) insurance plan. In lieu of the City paying $14.40/employee/month in premium b costs, the base salary range for Commanders will be increased $20.00/mo. Cost: $342.00/year (includes PERS costs) 5. Modification of the current bereavement leave policy to allow the Public Safety Director to authorize one additional shift of leave in the event the employee is required to travel extended distances. Previous language limited additional shift for "out- of-state" death. A copy of the Memoradum of Understanding is available in the Per- sonnel Office for review. Respectfully submitted: Concur: 400{/E4c Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager /../1-5/9> December 01, 1992 City Council Meeting December 15, 1992 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 92-1079 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT REGARDING STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR ON -SALE AND OFF -SALE ALCOHOL ESTABLISHMENTS AND TO CHANGE THE MANDATED CONDITIONS FOR OTHER CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES TO RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS AND TO ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 92-1079, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of November 24, 1992, this ordinance was presented to Council for consideration, and was introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Benz, Edgerton, Mayor Essertier Midstokke, Wiemans None None Elaine Doerfling, ACityClerk Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE 92-1079 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT REGARDING STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR ON -SALE AND OFF -SALE ALCOHOL ESTABLISHMENTS AND TO CHANGE THE MANDATED CONDITIONS FOR OTHER CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES TO RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS AND TO ADOPT AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION A. Some of the standard conditions for alcohol establishments need modification; B. The standard conditions for other conditionally permitted uses, including off -sale and off -sale alcohol establishments, while applicable in most case, should be recommended conditions, not mandated; C. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the staff environmental review committee and this project was determined to qualify for a negative declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Amend the first paragraph of Section 10-7, On -sale alcohol beverage establishments to read as follows: "The following minimum conditions hall be impo3cd on all e3tabli3hment3 engaged in the off sale of alcoholic beverages and standards, in addition to any other deemed necessary or appropriate to ensure compatibility with existing or future permitted use in the vicinity, may be required:" Amend the first paragraph of Section 10-8, Off -sale alcohol beverage establishments into two paragraphs to read as follows (sub -section (1) becomes the first paragraph, and the first paragraph, as amended, becomes the second paragraph) and re- number the sub -sections •(2) through (15) as (1) through (14): "Any new off -sale alcohol beverage establishments shall be a minimum of one -hundred (100) feet from any residential use and/or zone. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The following minimum conditions all c3tablichmcn-t3 engaged k the- e€f-3a1c of alcoholic beverage° and standards. in addition to any other deemed necessary or appropriate to ensure compatibility with existing or future permitted use in the vicinity. may be required:" SECTION 2. Amend Sections 10-7(8) and 10-8(9) (to be re- numbered to 10-8(8)) to read as follows: "The police chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists and may require authorize the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel to eliminate the problem, and then shall submit a report to the Planning Commission. which will automatically initiate a review of this conditional use permit by the Commission. SECTION 3. Eliminate from Section 10-7(4) the last phrase "and to control flies" SECTION 4. SECTION 5. Amend the first paragraphs of Sections 10-3, Coin- operated, self-service car wash and 10-9.1, by changing the word "shall" to "may". Add a paragraph to Section 10-4, Service Stations (gasoline sales), in front of sub -section (1) to read as follows: "The following uses and activities, and minimum conditions and standards, in addition to any other deemed appropriate or necessary to ensure compatibility with existing or future permitted use in the vicinity, may be allowed and/or required:" SECTION 6. Amend the first paragraph of Section 10-9, Day care homes, large, to read as follows: "The Planning Commission shall grant a permit if all of the following conditions are met, and may waive said conditions when deemed appropriate:" SECTION 7. Amend the first paragraphs of Section 10-11, Recycling, small collection facilities, and Section 10-12, Recycling, large collection facilities, to read as follows: "The following minimum conditions and standards which apply to the siting of a collection facility, in addition to any other deemed necessary or appropriate to ensure compatibility with existing or future permitted uses in the vicinity, may be required:" SECTION 8. This ordinance shall become effective and in be in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 9. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. LH/CCORD PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1992, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APP D A TO Fr: G: -C CITY ATTORNEY -)5--9;:L RE4TI E D PARK PACIFIC SHOPPING CENTER Da U 1 1992 1100 PACIFIC COAST HWY. HERMOSA BEACH, CA. 90254 CITY MGR. OFFICE MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 282 REDONDO BEACH, CA. 90277 December 2, 1992 To the Honorable Mayor, Robert Essertier and Members of the City Council of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 Dear Mayor and members of the City Council; The Security Pacific Bank located at 1100-5 Pacific Coast Hwy. Hermosa Beach has been purchased by the Bank of America who are considering closure of said Branch. The aforementioned Bank has been in operation since 1978, serving South Bay residents with full banking services including three automatic teller machines. Parking facilities include 180 auto parking stalls. Four extra high powered flood lights have recently been installed. With the inclusion of Ralphs Grocery Co. and the other service facilities in the shopping center, this produces a convenient business relationship with the South Bay's population. Please also find enclosed petitions with hundreds of signatures requesting the aforementioned Banks continuous service at the Pacific Coast Hwy and Aviation Blvd. location, Hermosa Beach. I am asking the Honorable Mayor and City Council members to support the continuous operation of the Security Pacific/Bank. of America. I will be present at the December 15, 1992 Council meeting to ask for your written support. Please respond. Sincerely, 3 4 H-darnosn Aeo^- C aci Foli c. -'lbwNGt-'Vi6.0._ ,fly V )6_ R4 1l4. _- ix--_-, Pc- ear - //3 -/s-y�- >q sis-44(e.) 90 •S -1-f frrAle.b.ga of vAt"e_DvlU6t 1._ 5 oils ( AT '{ot4g /0 g 6 lxitm t, 1-14 1 RFF)cu s liTTb 7oN oNar 1,61fia /14 r /.o so 7 R6/ -14 -TI -Y. - 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 S(NC‘ MV L-71015(00%15 Mme LOY F'' 'JOHN # fKf Nsan) Cyr- Loefl - Acb-ss 71)3 cooftj:04 %dt) 1- PT doe A N5) 'ThB int S»1fW) 06126- 14fts i36b A)60/N - )31FFiCut7V IN / %/1 'r GDSvs igrvNg, 67b tst jebfc P1 -oui niF677N6S, xN My Ob'IA) rr Is mei PGaPorrer '-7-11-Ar 1` CLQ ST13TSmbar 36 /hftr- B / mosol Boni,/ C oc'r of L 7JrfT,rr/ s /N > / `_BAYS /Al cows rsr7b'yzT btre►D B1 -c- 8 - 'L 1 $ , i A) Tl1-/N 17 18 71hPlZF I S fi-14EzA r j OPS TY3 CrS I6- 711)1C Jit) -7/6 19 rnoNM i TotatA f. "ff S Cti Etu (-FS Iz 7fles MA99, i 20 lS NO7"0v17tfM77r JDlW G r- tAcT ' ffr S6Tr4Abth 21 9UNbf'1S f r Tom (,y UnruS&t , 22 23 Lt yr ('ouNcl fftib Pc./fiANm uG Oarrlrngs' ) fP7 7AJ6.f 24 Tthefr OD 0 or DN 7-1,(5-3).5,9-y �/6-1/6ods sivoua 4F, CAN Fftft bt AT- 7J6 //6 -p -y m /N /T1 u 0 REDIFORM, 45 476 POLY PAK (50 Sets) 4P476 25 4b 7W 1 C6 Cat.) teu6 1 t /tT- 10004 Fett-c441&_ 7&_ O77-/-e3e c RL CD4NG(C. ! b-v77N6S C ,f -L- of 1.01}0.11_ ekir 2 ---16\115 eft L. -WE $'t rgsvious CouNel4- rn'Tif}1h. wH CO 1:4o NOT OCCUU oN 7T4 b- 2v3Y 6 i 11 NG- £MMu LA 4 5 6 7 4E- R6pL>Iyb f Sty & ?DSS/6L )iTlf NUT -70,F -re) -Mr f ca Lf C, Ili is PLf 1 /N 77)-6- Mit 7V S Cly- uu of PRO QmeteltiG 8 CPL apA P/W-g /}it jQ s 61(n5-17/5 7 r 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 c ec Divcr ftig rooN37 9ii-cua 8fr Rce,(10S. /3r LEST" 9/VCS; lioGoiry -. WftS Cj) .13‘- L(J/77t io 77/6 t t of Ji'6- W cog 7wD S oPb ,Ina 7701r f ) S Grr N511b'R W /rioter Norl7.f 6. V ` f 6u3 V/f /�'1 �t �T�yls✓a�s -Tt/3 � fs`P l tom' Pi-oxMrim/NG / 3a116. SoFS FX(ST R g51)61 ' i J tyy.f 77U/, /& J L /Nt (C41-7bt (130771- C 1st MS 114 IN- aMs- e it) f favi ous cat( NC(( f- 7N6 s 771A -T IF 0P 77/ tp- N-c7s2E' k f1,6' cf naco/Y1ff1Sff 20 21 22 23 24 25 V NL1 Kr- /N tasc/( Gt/rtf6 oiluL7'�1 fs i% W ICS /N 771-f/ 771-6-74 /r 706 S, ram 9 ge,t-c4z o bvb- y ANG. 47(i cp-ws1OAi --7ps/4, Is 77 (Z&?Ver oU Pis 7h4P6`� / 4 f Gt 7awt fir 7 CDR,2b ' 77rnf) f( C6- T yPfcfta y REDI FORM. 4S 476 POLY PAK (50 Sots) 4P476 9Ltdt (sioS OS) )IVd AlOd 9Lt SP Sl vl £l 11 /; mild. u! QJ 5/1/Rr1 INA U/wo; MSL/ cl'✓I 7V n •)11-.0 -1 s) .& (QN4'SR "'/ ll OZ 61 _nzerY7 lG 81 2,9297/Y��' LI 91 9/S Sod- 5/ Sl 5.9 air .6) h sa I am IF • S1.rv.9 cp59.y v50Wacyl 9 -}LL bl J-2c4Q/nLL1 n W dg Jr Uu4Q/LA Q , (2- L. Cl ll N oIss9,nV 09071zu M -99 ') i k'l f] j i LI 294/01 cvs �7--9n'J7L. N fJ '- J'►��. L ANY . W r/ 01 6 '1354,71.4104/ ,041 . LON �..SQV .JoN ' orn 17 8 'l7 JdQ -9rVi45 Ion/ s. /L M pi Q5dS 1i ff / -r. 3 7 Q/Ll 4261h-70 S8 ,A -819{/l, L 9 - GvoolGv/ iso w s/ __1:111-01 SI � /G s ivlt� cu S Ow w 9► hd V 11 o N/ _.5L-ld ('L 01 411141.9claff 0411U S9 _LAIL Sl Zssit N/ 4')No '417&Q' jliT910S Td 91.0 hnbi N cW& C l (VW ¶wg '- -cka M )0-0-9 4(70/5/q. syd. NQ q Nt.9 VV Vol (gi) M Y • /(Ccmvxi q /99Z CZ,2 erizthi iecZewiz. 4,),7A6 mvv ithae'/z, 90 =kF/ /JL /7 i" ,,f7u_&o, e/ z4 ' LZ5:" / 99z C L �4z eLL /as) l.�C �cCIC, 5�0- ,Az. v7PL cd_c t_zy)-2 A4 -4(2.6C-, WcAtifia_ a Its Q azuzze..L V42/6J726e,L AJIL&L,_ "4_5412 A icji•k) 7-7d (&? l(/ L _7202 era., Lc/L/ �!� C JLJ� 4 dd ZAA.2 StAzi_r-L Y/LL 73-tL sL S ..65zLaYJ 6 51 �- y2'1-/-6Vu C G,e Pna.c Le. � 7 `7; . 7 L t-/ /h . L' i_ee( /Q`id�'�L� i2 L ISL . L�tL� i'r'IGi .z;=(�`� A; L601 4j-iS � •C -/ 2_5`/LLiL/ GL, Crc.LG� 4c /c2_4 le -L--/-1 a 2 •&Lc_ . cCr�2v-c e i2z.z L c / G � 2 4fIdac,c �L cJ Bob Civitello, President R. Buzz Bozzi, Vice -President Judy Navarro, Secretary Steve Murdoch. Treasurer Gerry Looney, Associate Liaison Greg Green, Planning Jim Davis, Sergeant at Arms DECEMBER 8, 1992 Vietnam Veterans of America South Bay Chapter 53 P.O. Box 2388 Redondo Beach, CA. 90278 310/542-3031 MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 710 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 HONORABLE SIRS, 1992, DECREED BY THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS AS THE "YEAR OF THE VIETNAM VETERAN" HAS BROUGHT ABOUT A WEALTH OF POSITIVE PUBLIC AWARENESS DIRECTED TOWARDS VETERANS OF ALL AMERICAN WARS AND CONFLICTS. VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA - CHAPTER 53, HAS JOINED WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE TO REQUEST THAT THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH OFFICIALLY RECOGNIZE THE VALOR AND SELFLESS ACTS OF AMERICAN VETERANS BY FLYING THE POW/MIA FLAG ON THE CITY FLAGPOLES. AS YOU MAY OR MAY NOT KNOW, THE POW/MIA FLAG IS THE ONLY FLAG OTHER THAN THE STARS AND STRIPES TO FLY OVER THE NATIONS CAPITOL IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES. THIS FLAG IS A TESTAMENT TO THOSE AMERICANS FROM ALL WARS WHO HAVE PAID A PRICE, OFTEN GREATER THAN DEATH ITSELF, TO INSURE THE FREEDOM OF AMERICA AND ALL OF HER ALLIES. IT SERVES AS A SYMBOL TO THE FAMILIES AND COMRADES OF ALL UNCOUNTED AMERICAN WARRIORS THAT THEIR SACRIFICE WAS NOT IN VAIN AND THAT WE SHALL NEVER FORGET THEM. THE COST OF THESE FLAGS WILL BE UNDERWRITTEN JOINTLY BY VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA - CHAPTER 53 AND THE HERMOSA BEACH VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE AND WILL POSE NO BURDEN TO THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. PLEASE TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO DEMONSTRATE TO ALL CITIZENS OF THE SOUTH BAY THAT HERMOSA BEACH IS PROUD OF HER VETERANS AND THE SACRIFICES THEY HAVE MADE FOR ALL MANKIND. RESPECTFULLY, R. BUZZ BOZZI VICE PRESIDENT VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA CHAPTER 53 -SOUTH BAY OAci KEN MARKS CHAIRMAN HERMOSA BEACH VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE 4d ,61-1.4 Ja3a a�C /68 G. As. —9 -1 - December —gar December 7, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council December 15, 1992 (CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 10, 1992) SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 92-4 PURPOSE: TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR OR PROHIBIT SECOND UNITS PURSUANT TO STATE CODE 65852.2 INITIATED BY STAFF Planning Commission Recommendation To prohibit second units by introducing the attached ordinance which includes a provision that if the prohibition is invalidated by a court of law a regulatory ordinance, as previously recommended, becomes effective. Staff Alternative Staff continues to prefer the safer position to adopt the regulatory ordinance to allow second units only in very limited situations. Staff and the Planning Commission previously recommended requiring a C.U.P., and allowing only on lots of a minimum of 6700 square feet with a maximum 600 square -foot unit size. Background At the meeting of November 10, 1992, the City Council considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission to establish requirements for allowing second units. The Council voted 5:0 to send the proposed ordinance back to the Planning Commission and directed staff to survey other cities and case law and then prepare an ordinance, with appropriate findings, to totally preclude second units. At their meeting of December 1, 1992, the Planning Commission recommended adoption of an ordinance to preclude second units, with a provision that if invalidated by a court of law that the regulatory ordinance (allowing second units on lots of 6700 square feet or more) would become effective in its place. For further background information please refer to the attached staff reports and minutes. Analysis Staff has conducted a survey of all 86 cities in L.A. County with 74 responding, as requested, and found that the majority of -1- cities in L.A. County, like Hermosa Beach, have not yet addressed the state law, Section 65852.2, regarding second units. The cities which have adopted ordinances to address the state law have predominantly used the approach to allow the creation of second units, but in strictly limited situations. Only three cities have adopted ordinances to strictly prohibit second units on single-family lots pursuant to sub -section (c) of the State law. For further explanation and discussion of the survey, please refer to the attached matrix and Planning Commission staff report. Pursuant to Section 65852.2(c) of the State Government Code, a city may not preclude second units "unless the ordinance contains findings acknowledging that the ordinance may limit housing opportunities in the region and further contains findings that specific adverse impacts on the health, safety and welfare that would result from allowing second units within single-family and multi -family zones areas justify adopting the ordinance." The Planning Commission, based on the recommendation of staff, is recommending the findings as contained in the attached ordinance to support prohibition of second units throughout the City. These findings acknowledge a limitation of housing opportunities, but note that Hermosa Beach is already providing its fair share in the region, and further, identify the following adverse impacts: Up to 30% more housing units, increasing congestion and decreasing residential quality of life; Up to 320 new students added to schools already over capacity; Up to 17,500 new vehicle trips added to local street network and onto intersections already over capacity; Increased parking demand; Increased auto emissions; Decrease in already limited residential amenities (privacy, open space, landscaping); Up to 500,000 gallons per day of additional sewage added to a system already at capacity; Increased impervious surface area and stormwater runoff into an already deficient drainage system; Up to 18% increase in solid waste generation (while the city is trying to comply with State mandated reduction); Decrease per capita level of service and/or cost of fire, police, or other emergency services, without off -setting revenue increase; Up to 35% increase in population and housing caused by combination of the added housing plus already expected increases in multi -family areas. This cannot be handled by the carrying capacity of the area. The adverse impacts identified in the findings are explained and described in more detail in the attached prohibiting ordinance. COI�JCUR��_ °Michael Schubacli Planning Director ..\.Lci...)E • J„tA.A.4_,----) Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Attachments Respectful submitted, submitted, n e%1 eYtson Associate Planner 1. Matrix summarizing City Survey 2. Proposed ordinances (prohibiting ord. and regulatory ord.) 3. P.C. staff report/minutes 12/1/92 4. C.C. staff report/minutes 11/10/92 5. P.C. staff report/minutes 10/20/92 6. Resolution P.C. 92-59, recommending a regulatory ordinance 7. Government Code Section 65852.2 p/pcsr2nd Regulations For Second Units On Single Family Properties City Completely Prohibited Through Zoning Only Completely Prohibited Pursuant to Government Code 65852.2 Granny Flats and/or Accessory Units Permitted Only Permanent Second Units Permitted with CUP, Pursuant to Govnt. Code 65852.2 Permanent Second Units Permitted Subject to Zoning Restrictions Only Agoura Hills X Alhambra X Arcadia X Artesia X Avalon X Azusa X Baldwin Park X Bell X Bellflower X Bell Gardens X Beverly Hills X Bradbury X Burbank X Carson X Cerritos X Claremont X Commerce X Compton* Covina X Cudahy X Culver City X Diamond Bar X Downey X Duarte X El Monte X El Segundo X Gardena X Glendale X - Glendora X Hawaiian Gardens' Hawthorne X Hermosa Beach X Hidden Hills' Huntington Park X Industry' Inglewood X Irwindale X La Canada Flintridge X Lakewood X La Mirada• X Lancaster X La Puente X '— La Verne' _ Lawndale X Jj k. r::.+ti+u. �k.F@i:�•wi6:u�'�iYC:ir�.�ii rw�+s:C.Y•� � t r�.�---rs.+Y City Completely Prohibited Through Zoning Only Completely Prohibited Pursuant to Government Code 65852.2 Granny Flats and/or Accessory Units Permitted Only Permanent Second Units Permitted with CUP, Pursuant to Govnt. Code 65852.2 Permanent Second Units Permitted Subject to Zoning Restrictions Only Lomita X Long Beach X Los Angeles X Lynwood X Malibu' Manhattan Beach X Maywood X Monrovia X Montebello X Monterey Park X Norwalk X Palmdale' Palos Verdes Estates X Paramount* Pasadena X Pico Rivera X Pomona X Rancho Palos Verdes X Redondo Beach X Rolling Hills' Rolling Hills Estates X Rosemead X San Dimas X San Fernando X San Gabriel X San Marino X Santa Clarita X Santa Fe Springs'' Santa Monica X Sierra Madre' _ Signal Hill X South El Monte' South Gate X South Pasadena X Temple City X Torrance X Vernon X Walnut X West Covina X West Hollywood X Westlake Village X Whittier X 74 Total Respondents • 28 3 15 2 26 : ' Indicates city gave no response. �, w•:: r .- .._ _. _ :« :h.,..4.. . _ 5- a . �c:r-..s...awia.:+;s.:wc�a�.�rcl'1i . `wuLui.r..a. �;Yis'Ts=__�'.�__ �r:•,.�,� .r s.: ,, iii:_____ t?��:._'_H ORDINANCE NO. 92 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT THE CREATION OF SECOND UNITS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 65852.2(c) OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on December 15, 1992, to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to receive and consider oral and written testimony on precluding second units and made the following Findings: A. Pursuant to State Government Code 65952.2(c) the City may adopt an ordinance to preclude the creation of second units to existing single-family dwellings, in single-family and multi- family zones; B. Although precluding second units on single family lots in the City of Hermosa Beach may limit housing opportunities in the region, that prospect is mitigated by the following reasons: 1. Hermosa Beach is almost 98% built out, and as currently developed is the most dense community in terms of housing and population in the South Bay region, and is ranked ninth in terms of population density in Los Angeles County. Thus based on comparative densities, as documented in the City's Housing Element, Hermosa Beach is already providing more than its fair share of housing opportunities in the region for a community of its size, and should not be expected to substantially increase its share; 2. Hermosa Beach already provides for and allows for additional multi -family housing, as 48% of all residential lots in the City are already, ,developed or permitted for two units or more. A recent land use inventory shows that current General Plan and Zoning designations would allow for approximately an additional 500 housing units to be built, or an increase of about 5.2 percent, almost all of this to be located in designated medium and high density areas. Thus, additional housing opportunities are available because of multi -family zoning and additional opportunities are not necessary. 3. Hermosa Beach already allows the addition of second units on single-family lots for "granny" housing for one or two adults of at least 60 years of age. -%- ..r.ei.A?4'.�r+: wJr.C_ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C. Allowing the creation of second units on single family lots will result in the following specific adverse impacts on public health safety and welfare both citywide and locally within single-family neighborhoods; 1. The creation of second units on all single-family lots in the City would increase the maximum potential of dwelling units in the city by 2,892 units (about thirty (30) percent more than the existing housing stock), resulting in increased population, density and congestion throughout the whole City, and also within neighborhoods which were otherwise established to create a low density character and to promote stability within these neighborhoods. The quality of life and character of Hermosa Beach would potentially suffer significant adverse impacts from a 30% increase in dwelling units; 2. The potential increase in housing and population by the addition of second units would impact the school system by adding up to 320 new students (based on the 1990 census ratio between school age children and dwelling units) while the school district is currently operating over capacity as recently indicated by the addition of temporary classroom buildings; 3. The potential increase in automobile traffic caused by the addition of second units would worsen existing and forecasted traffic conditions as it would result in the addition of substantial increased vehicle trips per day (up to 17,500) on the local street network citywide, which already has 4 signalized intersections at level of service (LOS) rating E or F and 7 of 14 major unsignalized intersections operating above capacity. Also, significant adverse impacts on specific neighborhoods may be caused by additional_ traffic and result in increased exposure to potential accidents and noise within neighborhoods specifically established to limit these types of impacts; 4. The addition of second units in single-family areas will exacerbate the existing parking deficiencies that frequently occur throughout the city, as documented in the Circulation, Transportation and Parking Element of the General Plan. Although additional on-site parking spaces that would be added for, residents of second units will partially compensate for the increased demand, it is not possible to fully compensate for the additional off- site parking demand resulting from the additional guests and visitors as no additional street parking capacity is - 7- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 available or can be provided on local streets. 5. An increased use of automobiles would be caused by the addition of second units thereby causing an overall increase in auto emissions and causing adverse impacts on local and regional air quality; 6. The potential increased density and additional building intensity would decrease already limited areas of private open space, gardens, and landscaped areas; thereby reducing air circulation, light, and privacy amenities of the existing housing stock. This would occur in neighborhoods specifically established to provide these amenities. Further, given the small lot sizes and history of development unique to Hermosa Beach, which has resulted in substandard setbacks and limited yard areas in many single family areas, the impact of reducing these amenities is compounded. 7. The addition of second units would generate additional sewage of up to 500,000 gallons per day (potentially up to a 100% increase on sewer lines that service individual single-family streets) causing a severe impact on an overall system which is already at capacity or deficient in many locations and is being retrofitted to handle a capacity consistent with housing densities envisioned by the General Plan. Therefore the potential increase in dwelling units may require resizing of existing lines and potential future capacity shortages; 8. The potential additional construction would increase impervious surface areas, which are already rather substantial, thus increasing the speed and quantity of stormwater runoff into the storm sewer and drainage systems of the city, which are deficient or: at capacity in many single-family areas of the City (as stated in the adopted Housing Element of the General Plan) and specifically in the "Valley" area of the citywhere the storm drains were found in a recent study to be unable to handle a 1 -year flood event (L.A. County flood control study) while the accepted standard is that storm drain systems should handle a 50 -year flood event. Therefore, with the addition of second units, the likelihood of flooding would increase or costly upgrading of storm sewer capacity which the City cannot undertake given current revenue constraints; 9.' The addition of second units would increase the residential generation of solid waste (by up to about t. 3600 tons per year, or, an 18% increase in total solid waste generated by the City) and thereby impact trash pick-up services and increase the City's contribution of solid waste to regional land fills, additionally the additional solid waste generation will make it more difficult for the City to comply with the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, which includes specific mandated amounts of waste reduction through recycling; 10. The addition of second units on single family lots, because of the service needs of the additional population, will impact the level of service and/or cost of fire, police, other emergency services, and administrative services. More specifically, the following services would be impacted for the reasons noted: a. The City's water service is already in need of upgrading to meet minimum standards to provide adequate water pressure for fire protection throughout the city. As stated in the Housing Element of the General Plan, some single-family areas in the City are deficient in comparison with National fire -flow standards, and the problem would be exacerbated with the addition of second dwelling units. b. The additional number of kitchens per structure or per lot would increase potential fire hazards, which coupled with increased density and congestion increases fire and paramedic response time, thereby impacting the level and/or cost of fire and paramedic services; c. Allowing second units behind existing structures or within existing structures reduces "defensible" space visible from the street, thereby providing opportunities for burglaries which will impact the level and/or cost of police services. d. The addition of second units within or behind existing structures may increase the difficulty of quickly locating an identified address when providing police, fire, pr paramedic responses to emergency calls. e. The current •per capita number of police officers, fire personnel, and paramedics, and administrative •i :�� - ..,_...,.T._..�,,..r.,��.:y.•:7n:.s:.sirrr:.:a�.:.d•;�o".�mra..:sY.�iitdx.#ifs."'-�" '' J`=�,rrr7rSt 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 personnel, and the level of service currently being provided based on these numbers, would be adversely impacted by an increase in population without off- setting revenue increases to add personnel. The addition of second units will create an insufficient increase in property tax and other tax revenues to off -set the additional needs of the added population. 11. The potential substantial increase of second units on single-family lots added to the marginal anticipated additional development in multi -family zones could add over 35% to the City's total population, which the carrying capacity of the area is not prepared to handle. D. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the staff environmental review committee and this text amendment was determined to qualify for a negative declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, based on the findings above, does hereby ordain the following amendments to the Zoning Ordinance: SECTION 1. Add Section 4-2 sub -section (11) to read as follows: SECTION 2. "Second Units - The creation of second units on single-family lots is prohibited, pursuant to Government Code Section 65852.2(c), based on the findings of the City Council as contained in Ordinance No. 92- , which acknowledge that housing opportunities may be limited in the region, and further, makes certain findings of specific adverse impacts on the public health, safety and welfare that would otherwise result if_second units were permitted. This ordinance shall become effective and in be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to.be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. _70 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. SECTION 5. The adoption of this ordinance amendment to preclude second units on single family lots will terminate if so ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction. At that time, the City will implement ordinance No. 92- , to allow second units, in the limited circumstances described therein. lh/ccor2nd PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1992, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPRO ASO(1FORM : (Ai c CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK O . o._ _.... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE 92 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE CREATION OF SECOND UNITS PURSUANT TO SECTION 65852.2(a) OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on December 15, 1992, to receive and consider oral and written testimony on this matter and made the following Findings: A. Pursuant to State Government Code 65852.2(a) the City may provide for the creation of second units in single-family and multi -family zone to an existing single-family dwelling; B. Recognizing Hermosa Beach is the most dense community --in terms of housing and population in the South Bay region, and the 9th most dense in population in L.A. County, and based on the findings of Ordinance No. , the prohibition of second units is justified, however, if these finding are found to be invalid the creation of second units should be limited only to those lots of sufficient size where a second unit would have minimal impact on surrounding single-family character; D. Allowing second units only on lots of over 6,700. square feet will provide the City's fair share of additional housing in the region, especially when considered in conjunction with the City's multiple -family zones, which contain 48% of all residential lots in the City. E. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the staff -:.eN:i�+.Wsr ,..swy ...:�.!�n:..1.�:Jw.ires...r-'.% ' '':.R.t�+;a..1:...,w.,a�riar+r.�r...�L..�.r ..a:�+:..is+�:..i..�t�a.."�`-t•1'y7ai'�`-s""a�1�o�.r=''—� '—�'-.:�� — �'Tt+.t �. ..a.a.::i...Lwas...:.sun,v�. ii 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 environmental review committee and this text amendment was determined to qualify for a negative declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain the following amendments to the zoning ordinance: SECTION 1 Amend Section 4-2 sub -section 1(a) to read as follows: "(a). Second Units, conditional use permit required. An owner -occupant may apply for a conditional use permit for a second unit, subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission of the design and architecture of the second unit, if all the following standards are met: The unit is not intended for sale and may be rented The second unit has a maximum floor area of six hundred (600) square feet but shall not exceed in any case 30% of the floor area of the existing dwelling. The lot contains at least six thousand seven hundred (6,700) square feet. Parking shall be provided pursuant to the parking standards of the zoning ordinance for two-family dwellings. All other requirements of the R-1 zone shall be met _for each dwelling unit, and all other applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance shall be met." SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective from the date of adoption in accordance with law but shall not be applied unless a court of competent jurisdiction invalidates Ordinance No. , adopted on , 1992, at which time this ordinance shall be immediately applicable. SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption -/3- .`n .ioM+. l:� flw.-„i4+:z.'.:kw sYsaL. a•�e�..n.,rs.dbw-.. i.:r..,PAv.YxiVsekw":.. 411^iiri 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1992, by following vote: ' AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: p/pers2ndA CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY - /4_- 4 BACKGROUND M4 TfR/A[ { November 23, 1992 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission December 1, 1992 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 92-4 PURPOSE: TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR OR PROHIBIT SECOND UNITS PURSUANT TO STATE CODE 65852.2 INITIATED BY STAFF Recommended Alternatives 1. Continue to recommend adoption of an ordinance to allow second units, but only with a conditional use permit and in limited circumstances (minimum 6700 square foot lot size, owner -occupied, maximum 600 square feet, etc.) and direct staff to continue to develop defensible findings for ultimate prohibition in the future 2. Recommend totally precluding second units based on the proposed findings contained in the attached alternative resolution; 3. Recommend precluding second units but with a provision that if the prohibition is invalidated by a court of law that the regulatory ordinance is immediately effective. Background At their meeting of November 10, 1992, the City Council considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission to establish requirements for allowing second units. The Council voted 5:0 to send the proposed ordinance back to the Planning Commission and directed staff to survey other cities and case law and then prepare an ordinance, with appropriate findings, to totally precluded second units. At their meeting of October 20, 1992, the Planning Commission voted 5:0 to recommend adoption of an ordinance to limit second unit housing opportunities to lots o 6,700 square feet or more. For further background information please refer to the attached staff reports and minutes. Analysis Government Code Section 65852.2(c) states that "no local agency shall adoptan ordinance which totally precludes second units within single family and multi -family zoned areas unless the ordinance contains findings acknowledging that the ordinance may limit housing opportunities of the region and further contains findings that specific adverse impacts on the health, safety and welfare that would result from allowing second units within -/S- .-..>;•e...a.5�:.:..wa�-..w.:.:..w,:w.�:�r..i..........P.t.:.:t:.4siA..guw.t llapj r.A. single family and multi -family zoned areas justify adopting the ordinance." CITY SURVEY Staff has surveyed all municipalities in Los Angeles County regarding their requirements for second units (see the attached chart). Staff was able to obtain responses from 74 out of 86 cities. Of the 74 responding cities, 28 do not permit second units or granny flats in their single family zones, but have not addressed the required findings of Government Code Section 65852.2. Fifteen more cities, including Hermosa Beach, do not address Section 65852.2 either, but have regulatory ordinances which allow second units for granny housing only. Of the cities which have addressed the state law, 26 allow second units in limited situations (typically controlled by minimum lot size and maximum units size) and two allow second units pursuant to state law. Only three cities have ordinances that specifically prohibit second units, and which include findings as required 'by Government Code 65852.2. These cities are Manhattan Beach, El Monte, and South Gate, and the findings are discussed - in detail below. In sum, the majority of cities in L.A. County, like Hermosa Beach, have not yet addressed the state law, Section 65852.2, regarding second units. The cities which have adopted ordinances to address the state law have predominantly used the approach to allow the creation of second units, but in strictly limited situations. MANHATTAN BEACH Manhattan Beach zoning code section 10.52.060 strictly prohibits any second unit on any lot in any RS district with an existing single family dwelling. There are three findings included in this section to support the prohibition: (1) Government Code Sections 65852.1 and 65852.2 are contrary to the municipal affairs doctrine of Article 11, Section 7 of the California Constitution and inapplicable to the City; (2) the City has determined that second units would not be an effective means of providing affordable housing within the City; and (3) the City has determined that second units are inconsistent with the land use and density policies of its General Plan and have specific adverse impacts on the local health, safety and welfare, including increased traffic and demand for public services and reduced privacy and security in residential neighborhoods. Unfortunately, the Manhattan Beach findings are either overly general position statements or just reiterations of the language in Government Code Section 65852.2(c). The first finding disputes the legality of this State law, which is a matter to be decided in the courts rather than in a local zoning document. The second finding is also a statement of position, which may be true but is not substantiated in the findings. The last finding merely repeats the State law reference to adverse impacts on the -I6- ?a.�:e...,.t • public health, safety and welfare, again without providing supporting evidence. This section was added just recently when the city hired a consultant to revise the zoning ordinance (ZORP) and has never been challenged. EL MONTE The El Monte regulation cites the State provision on public health, safety and welfare, and provides specific reasons for this finding: (1) second units would promote a population increase in areas with insufficient infrastructure to accommodate such growth; (2) the increased traffic volumes associated with the population growth would increase the potential for traffic accidents and add to noise and air pollution levels; and (3) second units would encourage renter occupancy which may have an adverse effect on "neighborhood stability." The E1 Monte ordinance also includes four other findings that reference housing opportunities on multi -family zoned properties, the need to preserve a balanced community, existing City programs for elderly housing needs, and a general reiteration of the adverse impacts on public health, safety and welfare (this last finding is no more than a summary statement). While the El Monte ordinance gives more specific reasons to support its findings than the Manhattan Beach code, the evidence provided is still overly general. There may be insufficient infrastructure in the single family neighborhoods, but no hard empirical data is included or referenced in the findings. Additional units would result in population and traffic volume increases, but the potential for increased traffic accidents, noise and air pollution is merely speculative in the absence of statistical projections. The concern over rental impacts on neighborhood stability is, at best, a subjective conclusion. The other findings related to the abundance of multi -family properties, preservation of a balanced community, and elderly housing programs are vague and to some degree irrelevant since these factors do not directly relate to adverse impacts on public health, safety and welfare. This ordinance also has never been legally challenged. SOUTH GATE The South Gate ordinance is by far the most detailed in issue specific findings for these three communities. The findings are a list of various social, economic and environmental impacts that could potentially occur through the proliferation of second units. The impacts cited by these findings include: (1) potential increases in land values that could constrain affordable housing development; (2) the increased cost of local government administration and enforcement activities that could result in raising processing fees, thereby making the new housing less affordable; (3) infrastructure constraints from the local Capital Improvement Program; (4) existing City regulations allow for room additions with additional bathrooms and minor cooking facilities, making a regulation permitting second units unnecessary; (5) potential overcrowding on the local public school system; (6) �:r potential detrimental traffic conditions; (7) residential sprawl that would be at odds with the public transit system; (8) loss of private open space that would reduce air circulation and light amenities; (9) adverse impacts on the local sewer system; (10) proliferation of rental units that would have a negative aesthetic impact; (11) negative fiscal impacts due to decreased State per capita subventions and low property tax revenues that would be insufficient to provide public services for the additional population; (12) increased water usage that could result in future shortages; (13) increase in impervious ground coverage which would increase water run-off, thus requiring changes in the existing sufficient drainage facilities; (14) second units abolish the integrity of single family zones, running contrary to the local Housing Element; (15) increased kitchen facilities that would increase fire hazard potential and paramedic calls; (16) increased demands on local parks; (17) increased motor vehicle air pollution; (18) inefficient use of energy in second units as opposed to cluster developments; (19) reduction in defensible space visible from the streets, increasing burglary potential and police costs; (20) decreased recreational yard space which may move more children to the streets for recreation; and (21) potential addition of over 25% of ultimate build -out population, which would overload the community's carrying capacity. Although this is an exhaustive list of potential adverse impacts, some of the findings are speculative and unsupported by statistical evidence(e.g. second units may abolish the "integrity" of single family zones). This ordinance, like the other prohibition ordinances, has not been legally challenged. PROPOSED FINDINGS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Staff has provided an alternative resolution with findings to preclude second units rather than allowing them in limited situations. The proposed findings in the alternative resolution were prepared to address Section 65852.2(c), and are also based on staff's recent land use inventory, the adopted Housing Element of the General Plan, and on discussions with various members of staff in regards to the impacts that might be caused by adding units, up to a maximum potential addition of almost 3,000 housing units, to single-family areas within the City. In essence this effort has been an attempt to identify and summarize all adverse impacts as typically found in an Environmental Impact Report. The types of impacts that would be caused by second unit development range from local or neighborhood specific to cumulative citywide impacts (i.e. the worst-case scenario of all potential second units being built). Staff has attempted to address both types of impacts in the findings and has included statistical data, where appropriate, to substantiate the findings. It should be noted that taking the hard-line position of prohibiting second units rather than allowing them in limited areas might make the city more susceptible to claims that its not .._., Lt _ . +I {141 c complying with State Law. If a court invalidates the prohibition, second units could then be placed on any single-family lot regardless of location or lot size (for example the three second unit requests now pending are all on fairly small lots). In this respect the alternative of allowing second units but in limited situations may be preferable. El Monte has taken the rather interesting approach to adopt a prohibition ordinance which contains a provision that if it is invalidated another regulatory ordinance (limiting second units to lots 8500 square feet or greater) would become effective immediately. NCUR / / //%. . Michael Schub'ch Planning Director Attachments Respectfully submitted, j ( /4. ,/ % (' Ken Robertson Robertson Associate Planner 1. Summary of Cities Survey 2. Alternative Resolution to recommend precluding second units 3. Resolution P.C. 92-59, recommending a regulatory ordinance 4. City Council minutes 5. P.C. Staff Report/Minutes 6. Government Code Section 65852.2 p/pcsr2nd •.:.>+e.:>u.i..:.es .trt.=•.a. .,._'+...rr+�'.n >.wc.:.+.sa ate.,- .t..sw..v..r.er-s ALTERNATIVE RESOLUTION 92-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT THE CREATION OF SECOND UNITS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 65852.2(c) OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 1, 1992, to receive and consider oral and written testimony on precluding second units and made the following Findings: A. Pursuant to State Government Code 65852.2(c) the City may adopt an ordinance to preclude the creation of second units to existing single-family dwellings, in single-family and multi -family zones; B. Although precluding second units on single family lots in the City of Hermosa Beach may limit housing opportunities in the region, that prospect is mitigated by the following reasons: 1. Hermosa Beach is almost 98% built out, and as currently developed is the most dense community in terms of housing and population in the South Bay region, and is ranked ninth in terms of population density in L.A. County. Thus based on comparative densities, as documented in the City's Housing Element, Hermosa Beach is already providing more than its fair share of housing opportunities in the region for a community of its size, and should not be expected to substantially increase its share; 2. Hermosa Beach already provides for and allows for additional multi -family housing, as 48% of all residential lots in the city are already developed or permitted for two units or more. A recent land use inventory shows that current General Plan and Zoning designations would allow for approximately an additional 500 housing units to be built, or an increase of about 5.2 percent, almost all of this to be located in designated medium and high density areas. Thus, additional housing opportunities are available because of multi -family zoning and additional opportunities are not necessary. 3. Hermosa Beach already allows the addition of second units on single-family lots for "granny" housing for one or two adults of at least 60 years of age. C. Allowing the creation of second units on single family lots will result in the following specific adverse impacts on public health safety and welfare both citywide and locally within single-family neighborhoods; 1. The creation of second units on all single-family lots in the City would increase the maximum potential of dwelling units in the City by 2,892 units (about thirty (30) percent more than the existing housing stock), resulting in increased population, density and congestion throughout the whole City, and also within neighborhoods which were otherwise established to create a low density character and to promote stability within these neighborhoods. The quality of life and character of Hermosa Beach would potentially suffer significant adverse impacts from a 30% increase in dwelling units; 2. The potential increase in housing and population by the addition of second units would impact the school system by adding up to 320 new students (based on the 1990 census ratio between school age children and dwelling units) while the school district is currently operating over capacity as recently indicated by the addition of temporary classroom buildings; 3. The potential increase in automobile traffic caused by the addition of second units would worsen existing and forecasted traffic conditions as it would result in the addition of substantial increased vehicle trips per day (up to 17,500) on the local street network citywide, which already has 4 signalized intersections at level of service (LOS) rating E or F and 7 of 14 major unsignalized intersections operating above capacity. Also, significant adverse impacts on specific neighborhoods may be caused by additional traffic and result in increased exposure to potential accidents and noise within neighborhoods specifically established to limit these types of impacts; 4. An increased use of automobiles would be caused by the addition of second units thereby causing an overall increase in auto emissions and causing adverse impacts on local and regional air quality 5. The increased density and additional building intensity would decrease already limited areas of private open space, gardens, and landscaped areas; thereby reducing air circulation, light, and privacy amenities of the existing housing stock. This would occur in neighborhoods specifically established to provide these amenities; 6. The addition of second units would generate additional sewage of up to 500,000 gallons per day (potentially up 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 to a 100% increase on sewer lines that service individual single-family streets) causing a severe impact on an overall system which is already at capacity or deficient in many locations and is being retrofitted to handle a capacity consistent with housing densities envisioned by the General Plan. Therefore the potential increase in dwelling units may require resizing of existing lines and potential future capacity shortages; 7. The potential additional construction would increase impervious surface areas, which are already rather substantial, thus increasing the speed and quantity of stormwater runoff into the storm sewer and drainage systems of the city, which are deficient or at capacity in many single-family areas of the City (as stated in the adopted Housing Element of the General Plan) and specifically in the "Valley" area of the city where the storm drains were found in a recent study to be unable to handle a 1 -year flood event (L.A. County flood control study) while the accepted standard is that storm drain systems should handle a 50 -year flood event. Therefore, with the addition of second units, the likelihood of flooding would increase or costly upgrading of storm sewer capacity which the City cannot undertake given current revenue constraints; 8. The addition of second units would increase the residential generation of solid waste (by up to about 3600 tons per year, or, an 18% increase in total solid waste generated by the City) and thereby impact trash pick-up services and increase the City's contribution of solid waste to regional land fills; 9. The addition of second units on single family lots, because of the service needs of the additional population, will impact the level of service and/or cost of fire, police, other emergency services, and administrative services. More specifically, the following services would be impacted for the reasons noted: a. The City's water service is already in need of upgrading to meet minimum standards to provide adequate water pressure for fire protection throughout the city. As stated in the Housing Element of the General Plan, some single-family areas in the City are deficient in comparison with National fire -flow standards, and the problem would be exacerbated with the addition of second dwelling units. b. The additional number of kitchens per structure or per lot would increase potential fire hazards, which coupled with increased density and congestion increases fire and paramedic response time, thereby impacting the level and/or cost of fire and paramedic services; c. Allowing second units behind existing structures or within existing structures reduces "defensible" space visible from the street, thereby providing opportunities for burglaries which will impact the level and/or cost of police services d. The addition of second units within or behind existing structures may increase the difficulty of quickly locating an identified address when providing police, fire, or paramedic responses to emergency calls. e. The current per capita number of police officers, fire personnel, and paramedics, and administrative personnel, and the level of service currently being provided based on these numbers, would be adversely impacted by an increase in population without off -setting revenue increases to add personnel. The addition of second units will create an insufficient increase in property tax and other tax revenues to off -set the additional needs of the added population. 10. The potential substantial increase of second units on single-family lots added to the marginal anticipated additional development in multi -family zones could add over 35% to the City's total population, which the carrying capacity of the area is not prepared to handle. D. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the staff environmental review committee and this text amendment was determined to qualify for a negative declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, based on the findings above, recommends the following amendments to the zoning ordinance: SECTION 1 Add Section 4-2 sub -section (11) to read as follows: "Second Units - The creation of second units on single-family lots is prohibited, pursuant to Government Code Section 65852.2(c), based on the findings of the City Council as contained in Ordinance No. 92- which acknowledge that housing opportunities may be limited in the region, and further, makes certain findings of specific adverse impacts on the public health, safety and welfare the would otherwise result if second units were permitted. 23- VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 92-70 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of December 1, 1992. Rod Merl, Chairman Michael Schubach, Secretary Date p/ccrs2ndp denia Comm. Marks observed the original approval least 2 - ears ago and objected to granting an Mr. Schubach .-ted the proposed project did standards. given at er extension. t all of today's Chinn. Merl invited audie e participa .n. No one wished to speak on this subject. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, _eco •ed by Comm. Suard, to APPROVE Staff's recommendation to .rant the --quested six-month extension. AYES: Comms 'i Monda, Oakes, S NOES: Co Marks ABSTAIN: 'one ABSENT: None Chmn. Merl Cha an Merl stated this item was approved subject o appeal to t• City Council within 10 days from the date of this meeting. TEXT 92-4 -- TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIRE- MENTS FOR OR TO PROHIBIT SECOND UNITS PURSUANT TO STATE GOVERNMENT CODE 65852.2 (referred back from the November 10, 1992 City Council meeting. Recommended Action: To recommend to the City Council as deemed appropriate. Mr. Schubach noted supplemental information (altered wording, as requested by the City Attorney) had been included in the Commis- sioners' packets. Mr. Schubach outlined the history of the progress of this item through the Commission and Council. The Council referred this item back to the Commission, as required by law, for the Commission's comments on totally prohibiting second units. He then detailed Staff's three recommended proposals and the City Council's recommendations. He stated that -Staff recom- mended proposal #3, with Alternative #A, as it was all encompassing and the City Attorney had approved the terminology. Comm. Di Monda asked if Staff could include in Page 2 of the report the traffic volume on Pacific Coast Highway and what would happen to this highway if almost 3,000 more units were allowed. Also, he wished included what the statistics would be with 17,500 trips per day, mentioning quantity of different articulants. Mr. Schubach stated Staff had looked into this and explained the factors that would need to be included in the formulas that must be •used. He suggested that Staff supply a sample, which Comm. Di Monda thought would be important information, since the City was already in violation of E.P.A. and Federal requirements. Comm. Di Monda also commented upon the increase in trash and the decrease in available land fill, which should be addressed in this report on Page 3. Page 4 should also mention the development pattern within the City; where old buildings are built on the lot lines and present associated problems for Police and Fire Depts. •— 2S— �ca::a„F..v:...-.a....'. ae... r,.�::v7tL...s,•rs[tw .nskaakRtr+Bs:L.x.�,-«..,,.: •• P.C.Minutes 12/1/92 -�..-.t .�.._..-aa..o:,:'S.a>:,:r�:rE.t:s.`.47G;.»Msa:.�'.4:�.i.�. — ��•i-•��su.Y �. Comm. Suard discussed the lack of any mention of increased parking problems with Mr. Schubach, who acknowledged this was a difficult problem. Comm. Suard felt allowance of additional units would increase the current parking problems. He stated his support of proposal #3, and suggested an addition to the last line to read, ...immediately and/or retroactively...". Chmn. Merl invited audience participation. Howard Longacre, 1221 7th Place, stated his support of proposal #3. Responding to Mr. Longacre's question, Mr. Schubach stated that three cities had adopted similar programs. Mr. Longacre felt residents were currently "packed like sardines". No one else wished to speak on this subject. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Suard, to APPROVE Staff's Recommendation #3. AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Oakes, Suard,Marks, Chmn. Merl NOES: None ABSTAIN: ABSENT: TAFF ITEMS Ch meeti Planni a. b. C. d. e. f. None None Merl announced that due to the extended duratio• of this the following Staff Items would be continued o the next Commission meeting: Report om Memorand meeting. Planning Depar Tentative future Memorandum regardin 1, 1992 City Council City Council minutes the City Treasurer regarding sa egarding the City Council/Pla nt activity report o anning Commissio lanning Co m ting. of ve •-r 10, 1992. COMMISSIONER ITEMS Comm. Suard wished to ad were previously discu between the City Coun the use of the P1 Schubach stated t included. Both great deal of agreed: Co City Coun communic agendi -d. s and use tax. ing Commission joint October, 1992. agenda. ssion liaison for December to the "St ed, which inc 1 and Planning Comms ing Commission, 4) gre e items related to Land Use ubjects covered many subjects an time to thoroughly discuss, to whic Di Monda suggested that another meetin be scheduled. The Commission agreed that ions were necessary and requested the Items" agenda items that ed: 1) communications ion, 2) the hotel, 3) elt parking. Mr. d RUDAT had been would take a Chmn. Merl with the • creased s be it Co . Marks asked the status of public park and right-of-way along Be h Drive. Mr. Schubach said the subcommittee was still active,' —2 6 — P.C.Minutes 12/1/92 r November 3, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 92-4 November 10, 1992 PURPOSE: TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR OR PROHIBIT SECOND UNITS PURSUANT T9 STATE CODE 65852.2 INITIATED BY PLANNINGh' Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation Adopt the attached ordinance to establish requirements for the creation of second units (although staff recommends modifying the Commission's recommended maximum unit size from 500 square feet to 600 square feet.) Background At their meeting of October 20, 1992, the Planning Commission voted 5:0 to recommend adoption of the ordinance. The Commission modified staff's recommended language to reduce the maximum unit size from 700 square feet to 500 square feet. For further background information please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report and minutes. The City has recently received two requests for conditional use permits for second units in existing single family dwellings. Pursuant to Section 65852.2 (b) upon receiving its first request the City must accept the application and approve or disapprove the application pursuant to a set of criteria in sub -section (b), or, adopt an ordinance within 120 days. Analysis Staff presented two alternative ordinances to the. Planning Commission, one which would give the opportunities for the creation of second units on properties with single family homes subject to certain development standards and ,one which would preclude the creation of second units, except for as allowed under current zoning (R -1A, R-2, R -2B, and R-3 zones). Based on the provisions of the Government Code and the advise of the City Attorney, the Commission is recommending the adoption of an ordinance which gives opportunities for second units only in very limited situations. The basic minimum standards are a minimum lot size of 6,700 square feet, a maximum unit size of 500 square feet, and a requirement that the second unit can be no 2 y,.• greater than 30% of the size of the main dwelling unit. -L- iif&" ek= 4 `J_.% Staff/is recommending that the maximum unit size for second units be modified to be 600 square feet, to be consistent with 2.1114'. .-A+ a+e.r . °.i Os..:..}+,w a]va.. _....fi.Y_�_.�'mw...+rare:'4�'iX�4tiw+••x4.L�..i,�i.ieS fp Municipal Code Section 7-1.5 which sets the minimum dwelling unit size at 600 square feet. Adoption of the proposed ordinance is consistent with the provisions of the state law which allow the imposition of standards and the designation of "areas" where second units may be permitted. The "areas" that would be acceptable for these second units are where larger lots exist of 6700 square feet or more (134 lots within the City), and this number is based on our General Plan to be consistent with the Low Density classification of 13 units per acre. Adoption of an ordinance to completely preclude second units would have to meet the requirement of sub -section (c) of the the ,state law and, as such, would have to include strong findings to 'support prohibition. Although this may be possible in Hermosa Beach given our density and small R-1 lot sizes, and since plenty of opportunities exist in other than R-1 zoning categories for the creation of second units, the City must find specific measurable adverse impacts caused by these second units. Obtaining this type of information requires greater research and study and could be pursued in the future if desired by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. The Planning Commission has already directed staff to initiate that study, but in the interim the proposed ordinance will place stringent but reasonable limits on the creation of second units while complying with state law. For further analysis and discussion please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report. CONCU�R�� Michael Schubach P1 ning Direct r Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Attachments Respectfully submitted, 74 /r /6/, %CJ ai Ken Robertson Associate Planner 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. P.C. Staff Report/Minutes 3. P.C. Resolution 92-59 4. Alternative Resolution presented to the Commission 5. P.C. Resolution of intent 6. Staff memo 9/30/92 7. Staff Review Minutes 8. Government Code Section 65852.2 .4'144.6w. -28 -. �.+.>,_......:.:. 'ritlut`-� - — - 's'�?r.ro?'a-�n;l"i�A,' 6. PROPOSED ORDINANCE FOR TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING ES- TABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR OR TO PROHIBIT SECOND UNITS PURSUANT TO STATE CODE 65852.2. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November 3, 1992, with Ordinance for introduction. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Mr. Schubach stated that 48 additional units were the maximum that could be built under this amendment. City Manager Ferrin responded to Council questions and presented a chronology of the events pursuant to this item. City Attorney Vose also responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 10:25 P.M. Coming forward to ad- dress the Council on this item were: Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., said that if a lot is clear, and of the proper size, State law allows a mobile home to be placed on the property; and, Jerry Compton - 1723 Valley Park Drive, expressed concern that State law would override 'local City Council Minutes 11-10-92 Page 7979 .-2. ,,.. NO. -+:n�.414'tfoa..tvw�•a]t'r!i.A.ly ai .C�9dS fY:ii+.��iMil:��.•+,�6 zoning laws and asked if anything could be done to not allow these second units in R-1 zones. The public hearing closed at 10:32 P.M. Proposed Action: To adopt an alternative Ordinance that follows Section C under the code, which totally pre- cludes second units, and direct staff to immediately begin the proper findings to accomplish this. Motion Midstokke, second Edgerton. The motion was with- drawn in favor of a subsequent motion. Action: To send the item back to the Planning Commis- sion with direction that the Council wishes to adopt an Ordinance which is consistent with Subdivision "C" of Section 65852.2 of the State Code, with proper findings that could include density, quality of life, sewers, traffic, condition of streets, summer influx of tourists, and parking, and to continue this item to the City Council meeting of December 15, 1992. Motion Midstokke, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Wiemans. (e order of the agenda was returned to item 4(a) at 10:46 P.M.') IRNI MIMIC PAL MATTERS 7. GUIDANCE ON CITY YARD RELOCATION SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated November 4, 1992. / City Manager Ferrin presented the staff/ report and re- sponded to Council questions. j Coming forward to addresthe Council on this item was: Tom Morley -N516 Loma Drive, questioned why the entire CityN Yard was ,being considered for oil drilling as previouslit had been stated that only one acre ofthe site would be needed, and that no move would`(be made until test wells had been drilled and'evaluated; submitted (directly to Council) excerpts `from the previous E.I.R. done on oil/drilling and•Nan excerpt from state environme tal law that stated if a project changes -ubstantially, an additional E.I.R. is needed questioned what had Changed since the prey us E.I.R. Action: Ti approve the staff recommendation to\consider as many -rtes as possible, including: N 1) i.iustrial yard space to the immediate south b the edondo-Hermosa border (in Redondo Beach); 2) the Body Glove building and property next to t City Yard; City Council Minutes 11-10-92 Page 7980 —30 -x�.a..-..rr.+w,..uc•.r.�afri7Lrar...t... •-.. �y� . October 15, 1992 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission October 20, 1992 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 92-4 PURPOSE: TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS OR PROHIBIT SECOND UNITS PURSUANT TO STATE CODE 65852.2 INITIATED BY PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt one of the alternative ordinances described below. Background Section 65852.2 of the State Government Code, Planning and Zoning Laws, sets forth the requirements for the creation of second units in single-family and multi -family zones (copy attached). In sum, Section 65852.2 does the following: a) provides the opportunity for a city to allow, by ordinance, the creation of second units in single-family and multi -family zones; b) when lacking an ordinance, requires a city to approve second unit requests that meet certain standards (for example, 1200 sq. ft. or less, conformance with zoning standards related to parking, setbacks, height, etc.), or; c) requires a city to make findings regarding health, safety, and welfare impacts to prohibit second units. Section 65852.2 (e) defines "second unit" as follows: "an attached or detached residential dwelling unit which provides complete indepedent living facilities for one or more persons. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as the single-family dwelling is situated." The apparent intent of this law is to address the problem of housing supply and affordable housing in the State, by encouraging cities to allow second units to be created from existing housing stock in existing developed areas, but, if cities do not explicitly allow second units, to create the opportunity for any individual that desires a second unit to have a way to obtain local government approval. The City has recently received two requests for conditional use permits for second units in existing single family dwellings. 3 Pursuant to Section 65852.2 (b) upon receiving its first application the City must accept the application and approve or disapprove the application pursuant to a set of criteria in sub -section (b), or, adopt an ordinance pursuant to sub -section (a) or (c) within 120 days. Analysis Staff has prepared two alternative ordinances, pursuant to State Government 65852.2 (a) and (c). Alternative A, prepared pursuant to sub -section (a), would give the opportunities for the creation of second units of a maximum of 1200 square feet on properties with single family homes subject to standard parking and zoning requirements and subject to a minimum lot area requirements (3350 sq. ft. per unit, or a minimum lot size of 6700 square feet). Also a conditional use permit would be required pursuant to Article 10 of the zoning ordianance. Alternative B, prepared pursuant to sub -section (c) would preclude the creation of second units, except for as allowed - under current zoning (R -1A, R-2, R -2B, and R-3 zones). Staff believes that Adoption of Alternative A is consistent with the provisions of sub -section (a) of the Government Code which allows the imposition of parking and zoning standards and allows the designation of "areas" that may be designated where second units may be permitted. The "areas" that would be acceptable for these second units are where larger lots exist of 6700 square feet or more (134 lots within the City), and this number is based on our General Plan to be consistent with the Low Density classification of 13 units per acre. To allow second units on all lots would not be appropriate as this would virtually convert every single family area into a two-family zone. Also, to maintain the single-family character, the size of the second units should be controlled. Adoption of alternative B, however, would have to meet the requirement of sub -section (c) of the the state law and, as such, would have to include findings "acknowledging that the ordinance may limit housing opportunities of the region and further contain findings that specific adverse impacts on the public health, safety, and welfare...justify adopting the ordinance." Since Hermosa Beach is a fairly dense city with very small R-1 lots, and since plenty of opportunities. exist in other than R-1 zoning categories for the creation of second units, making these findings is partially possible. However, to find specific adverse impacts caused by these second units would require some supportable facts and figures to show that second units would have adverse impacts. In that regard staff does not believe that adequate studies have been developed to show, for example, that allowing second units would cause adverse impacts on traffic - 3i- • flow, sewer capacity, water supply etc, and would thus caution that prohibiting second units completely at this time may not be consistent with the State Law. Obtaining this type of information or studies could be pursued in the future if desired by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. Michael Schubach Planning Director Attachments 1. Proposed Alternative Resolutions 2. P.C. Resolution of intent 3. Staff memo 9/30/92 -33 - Respectfull submitted, Robe on Associate Planner Comm. Marks diussed with Mr. Schubach the conditions requir=d and reviewed by the Health D Comm. Oakes felt ad area, and was please inesses increasing. esthetics of the propo gested acceptable mate aluminum, iron, etc. C barricade be presented as prior to installation. C limitation in the use of pa seating area, equivalent to MOTION by Comm. Suard, recon application CUP 92-16 an recommended by Staff and/ the railing will be resubm.iitted as products within the o•tside seat same limitations as •posed upon Ja anitary artment. quate parking was availabXe within the to see additional "night -life" bus - he expressed conce0 regarding the ed barricade. Cgmm. Di Monda sug- ials be specif . Oakes re a Review Sua pr er ha ed; i.e.: twisted uosted the proposed em to the Commission d suggested imposing a ucts within the outside imposed upon Java Man. by Comm. Marks, to APPROVE 92-6 with the conditions anges.as discussed; the Review Item and paper ng area will have the a Man. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Co Di Honda, Harks, Merl ne one None ekes, Suard, Chmn. Chmn. Me stated this application had been approved; subject o appeal within 10 days to the Cit Council. Tany Bode, Hermosa Beach resident, prese ted to the Commission correspondence and videos for its =view prior to the next scheduled meeting. T 92-4 -- TEXT AMENDMENT TO PRQ UJ3IT OR ? ST. LIS#j IZF, LENTSFOF�THECREipU�iIT 3 �U SUANTTO QOVERNMENT CODE 65852.2. r.Schubach stated State Government Code Section 65852.2 set forth the requirements and defined "second units" with the apparent intent to address the housing supply and affordability problem by encouraging cities to allow second units in existing developed areas. If cities do not allow these units, the opportunity is created •for local residents to obtain local government approval. Mr. Schubach noted two C.U.P. requests for second units in single-family dwelling areas had been received, which must be approved/denied pursuant to set criteria, or adopt an ordinance within 120 days. Mr. Schubach stated Staff had prepared two alternative ordinances, presented as Alternatives A and B of which he detailed, as well as the methods of application for each, for the Commission. Comm. Di Monde commented upon the . .:.yap.•. -•'::`iv i'o:w••t:.i::..+s:.::.�..'7.i.�.0 ..,.�..,,::. -3� P.C. Minutes 10-20-92 'w»r..�w..:,.�..,...-.:1.'t..a:�:i�'..1L•G'iif�.J.k.w.L 1+�.Y`.i4t11..''�'J� energy given by Staff to this proposed ordinance, which creates the ability to turn some sections into multi- family areas, rather than investigation findings to pre- clude the second units from occurring. He asked if the General Plan needed to be amended; noted the City's density, parking problems and impact upon City services. He also asked if the City Council was aware of this item, why nine years had passed prior to this item being addressed, and commented the Commission should have had the opportunity to review a pamphlet covering this subject and issued by the League of Cities. Comm. Di Monda stated this item was not initiated by the Planning Commission, but that it was being presented again. Comm. Di Monda expressed concern that the Commission would be reacting to an application which is arguable as to if it falls under the ordinance, already, feeling it might allow those people with "bootleg" units to legitimatize them. He felt the issue was being rushed, and perhaps in the wrong direction. Mr. Schubach stated the item was initiated by Planning Staff; the correction would be made prior to submittal to City Council. He stated little energy had been expended, since this was an amendment to the Code allowance, which required allowance be made for "granny units". He explained the hardship in assuring the occupant was over 62 years of age, noting if the person was 61, they did not qualify. Other cities had felt age limitation was not a good idea and had initiated appropriate ordinances. He stated Staff was simply eliminating the section was stated, "62 years of age," changed "640 square feet", to "700 square feet" to qualify one -bedroom units. He stated the current terminology in Section B could cause serious problems if taken to court. Mr. Schubach then explained the action time limits and the procedures necessary to process this amendment, noting the lack of time.in which to make the necessary findings. He felt current actions would not exclude future opportunities to review the issues and take appropriate actions. Comm. Suard and Mr. Schubach discussed the provisions for bachelor -type units within the R-2 and R-3 Zones versus the proposed unit space of 700 square feet. Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Merl at 8:25 p.m. Betty Martin, 257 27th Street, requested the terminology be changed, to which Mr. Schubach responded that it had been and that she had.an "old" copy. She commented the tenants were supposed to be related to the property owner, to which Mr. Lee responded single-family resident tenants did not have to be "blood" related. He noted the City P.C. Minutes 10-20-92 �r..,�.r_�.Kr.Mir.ti.s. 'ilti1'i�.".r�..�'%rM�br :,:.... �...✓ ...aw,..c. could include provision that only owner -occupant could make application for the second unit, which would provide restriction. No one else wished to speak regarding this item, and Chmn. Merl closed the Public Hearing at 8:28 p.m. Comm. Oakes confirmed with Mr. Schubach the approximate location of the impacted lots and that parking require- ments must be met by the entire lot if a second unit was built. Comm. Suard determined the City had approximately 52% R-1 lots, other cities' "norm" was a lot higher, and suggested this would be a reason for exemption. Mr. Schubach noted the risk was in being challenged, defining the particular item requirements for prohibition of second units. Mr. Lee stated State Law required specific finding of adverse impacts be made, which included specific factual support. He stated the ordinances are sent to the Dept. of Housing and Community Development and closely reviewed by housing applicants. He explained the difficulty in developing those findings within the short time frame. Mr. Lee underscored the point that the opportunity to develop an ordinance is lost if not completed within the specific time limit, which had prompted Staff to take action on this item. He discussed the possibility of readopting another ordinance with the specific findings requirements, noting the review of the second units would probably be under the State provisions. He had found that the Appellant Court was usually very harsh on cities for taking actions which would lessen housing opportunities and/or prevent second units. Mr. Lee stated the purpose of the suggested terminology was to make it legally defensible. He recommended adoption of an ordinance with the "most teeth" at this time, stating the Commission must ask itself if the standards were reasonable and tough enough. Comm. Oakes felt adverse effects would be created if second units were allowed, which would perhaps justify exemption. She stated Hermosa Beach was a small city with small lots. She suggested higher numbers be used. Mr. Schubach stated findings would be necessary in order to implement Comm. Oakes suggestion,. and that perhaps the courts would find it unreasonable. Chmn. Merl concurred, stating the findings would need to be extremely specific. • Comm. Di Monda compared Beverly Hills to Hermosa Beach, commenting that city did not allow people sleeping and camping on the street, truck trailers parked on the street and had homes located on 6 to 20 acres. He expressed _36 _ P.C. Minutes 10-20-92 • concern that the report was insubstantial, while the impact on the City's quality of life would be high. He strongly opposed adoption of the Text Amendment, request- ing a comparison of other cities defense against this same problem, as well as notation as to which were successful, not successful and why. He also discussed with Mr. Lee the City's options as to future actions if the amendment were approved. Mr. Lee stated he did not see prevention from adopting an initial ordinance under Subdivision A, and subsequently, after Staff has had adequate time to develop specific adverse impacts that could be created by second units, amend the Municipal Code to preclude second units. Mr. Schubach stated most cities had adopted Sec- tion A and expressed concern that, with the short notice, findings would be legally defensible. • Comm. Marks clarified that the State would overrule the City's Master Plan and Zoning Plan, allowing over- population, to which Messrs. Schubach and Lee agreed, giving examples of previous requirements by State agencies. Comms. Di Monda, Oakes and Mr. Schubach then discussed the impact upon reasonable, required open space. Comm. Di Monda requested that Staff investigate the actions taken by Manhattan Beach regarding open space requirements. Mr. Lee stated that if the Commission were to adopt Subdivision C, it instruct Staff on a priority basis, to investigate and present findings within the time limit. Comm. Suard suggested obtaining an advisory opinion from the State regarding the excessive multi -unit problem, other cities be queried, and work on a Subsection B proposal. Mr. Lee felt the State's response would be that it was a legislative decision based upon individual facts related to the community, which the City must supply. Comm. Suard suggested the request be made. Hefelt the State's Section 5, limiting to 30% of living area, could be added to the "700 square foot" Section, resulting in a state- ment, "The second unit has a maximum floor area of 700 square feet and cannot exceed 30% of the existing living area." Comm. Marks suggested this item be used as a means of leverage to clean Hermosa Avenue, illegal second units would be made to comply or close. Mr. Lee stated the question as to whether or not "bootlegs" (which are not a legal usage) are second units can be addressed through the local ordinance; a code enforcement issue. Comm. Marks noted that many "bootleg" units are separately metered and easily. identified. P.C. Minutes 10-20-92 MOTION by Comm. Oakes to ADOPT TA 92-4, Text Amendment, Alternative A, with addition of from the State Code Section B.1, "the unit is not intended for sale and may be rented," Section 5, "any increase in the floor area of an attached second unit shall not exceed 30% of the existing living area" and change Subsection A first paragraph, third line to read, "...unit to an existing single -gamily dwelling". Motion failed due to lack of a second. Comm. Di Monda hoped that after passing Alternative A, Alternative B would be reviewed. He stated the Condominium Code established a limit of 900 square feet, rather than the 700 square feet being recommended for this action. Mr. Schubach stated another 700 square feet provision was in the Condominium Code. Comm. Di Monda stated he wished the square footage to be 500. Mr. Schubach stated if 700 square feet was requir©dt it would be changed prior to presentation to City Council. Comm. Di Monda referenced State Ordinance, Line Item #C.7, noting the architectural review was in the Condominium Code but not the R-1 Zone second units. Mr. Schubach agreed, stating it would be covered through the C.U.P. Mr. Lee suggested architectural review in the R-1 Zone be included as a provision, if the Commission so wished. Comm. Oakes agreed to an amendment to the motion. AMENDED MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Merl, to ADOPT TA 92-4, Text Amendment, Alternative A, with addition of from the State Code Section B.1, "the unit is not intended for sale and may be rented," Section 5, "any increase in the floor area of an attached second unit shall not exceed 30% of the existing living area", change Subsection A first paragraph, third line to read, "...unit to an existing single-family dwelling" and include a provision to require architectural review relatingto second units within the R-1 Zone. AYES: .Comm. Di Honda, Marks, Oakes, Suard,.Chmn. Merl NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION by Comm. Di Monda that the Planning Commission send a letter to the City Council asking it to reconsider the open space study forwarded to' it by the Planning Commission; specifically pointing out this Ordinance. Mr. Schubach stated that had been already included at the Council's next scheduled meeting, asking that the study be done. Comm. Di Monda requested a letter be sent stating that if a percentage of open space_is required, that the P.C. Minutes 10-20-92 single-family home character be preserved, because of this ordinance. The Commission concurred with this request. AMENDED MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Suard, to direct Staff to present to the Commission ordinances cast by other cities (Carmel, Beverly Hills, Santa Barbara) that have attempted to deal with this issue, include the Dept. of Housing and Community Development opinion and contact the League of California Cities. No objections, so ordered. A break was taken from 9:20 to 9:30 p.m. CON • 0-15, 17, IS, 19 -- RXTE? SIO` FOR EXPIRED CC PIT1QNM.. USE PERMITS FOR FOUR TWO-U'NIT/CONDOMINIUMS. Mr. SchINSAch stated Staff recomm- ded a six-month extension by"•,inute order, discusses previous Commission and City Counc action relative t• this item and stated the applicant had xperienced dif culty obtaining finan- cing. He stated t = plans habeen plan checked and approved for building •ermit issuance, with the .only remaining obligation b:'ng the building permit 'fee payment. He explained the .indings the Commission could make by minute order. There were no questions •f Staff, d at 9:37 p.m., Chmn. Merl invited members of the audien to speak. No one wished to speak relat pig to this item. Comm. Suard noted p at all three proposed ructures were designed to a 35- et height. Comm. Di Monda eferenced a previous present tion made which established it. as compa- tible with the _urrounding area, and the plans di• onform to the inten on. Comm. Oakes felt this was import- t to reference. Comm. Marks established this wouldbe he first exte.=ion. NOTION 'y Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Chmn. Merl, to APPRO • Staff's recommendation to extend the C.U.P. for six•.•nths, to January 22, 1993, by minute order. AYE: NOSS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Comm. Di Honda, Marks, Oaks, Suard, Chmn. Her' None None None P.C. Minutes 10-20-92 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 92-59 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE CREATION OF SECOND UNITS PURSUANT TO SECTION 65852.2 OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 20, 1992, to consider oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. Pursuant to State Government Code 65852.2(a) the City may provide for the creation of second units in single-family and multi -family zone to an existing single-family dwelling;____ B. The creation of second units should require conditional use permit approval and should be consistent with zoning standards in regards to parking, height, setback, lot coverage, open space, and shall be subject to a maximum unit size; C. Recognizing Hermosa Beach is the most dense community in terms of housing and population in the South Bay region, and the 9th most dense in population in L.A. County, the creation of second units should be limited only to those lots of sufficient size where a second unit would have minimal impact on surrounding single-family character; D. Allowing second units only on lots of over 6,700 square feet will provide the City's fair share of additional housing in 'the region, especially when considered in conjunction with the City's multiple -family zones, which contain 48% of all residential lots in the City. -40 - f• 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ( c - E. An environmental assessment has been conducted by the staff environmental review committee and this text amendment was determined to qualify for a negative declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, recommends amendment of the zoning ordinance text as follows: SECTION 1 Amend Section 4-2 sub -section 1(a) to read as -follows: (a). Second Units, conditional use permit required. An owner -occupant may apply for a conditional use permit for a second unit, subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission of the design and architecture of the second unit, if all the following standards are met: The unit is not intended for sale and may be rented The second unit has a maximum floor area of five hundred (500) square feet and shall not exceed 30% of the floor area of the existing dwelling The lot contains at least six thousand seven hundred (6,700) square feet. Parking shall be provided pursuant to the parking standards of the zoning ordinance for two-family dwellings. All other requirements of the R-1 zone shall be met for each dwelling unit, and all other applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance shall be met. VOTE: AYES: Comm. DiMonda, Marks, Oakes, Suard, Chmn.Merl NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 92-59 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meeting of October 20, 1992. � __-.2-- i� 7 , ( Rod Merl, Chairman Michael Schubach, Secretary (1.-9 42_ Date The Planning and Zoning Law Fee authority Protection for solar energy systems Establishment of zoning districts Uniformity "Granny" housing Provisions for second unit ordinances/findings rifles and regulations. (f)\ounties and cities may adopt a schedule of fees for applications for compliance with this section sufficient to recover their reasonable costs of carrying out this section. Those fees shall be used only for theimplementation of this section. (g) As used in this section: (1) "Acutely hazardous material" means any material as defined pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 25532bf the Health and Safety Code. / (2) "Administering and Safety Code. C (3) "Hazardous ai�`.emissions" means emissions into the ambient air of air contaminants which have been identified as a toxic air contaminant by the State Air Resources Board'or by the air pollution control officer for the jurisdiction in which the project is located. As determined by the air pollution control officer, hazardous�ir emissions also means emissions into the ambient air of any substance identified in subdivisions (a\o (f), inclusive, of Section 44321 of the Health and Safety Code. (h) Any misrepresentation f information required by this section shall be grounds for denial, suspension, or revocation of project approval or permit issuance. The owner or authorized agent required to comply with this secti*hall notify all future occupants of their potential duty to comply with the requirements of Sections 25505, 25533, 25534 of the Health and Safety Code. (i) This section shall not apply to applications solely for residential construction. (Added by Stats. 1988, Ch. 1589; Repealbd and added byStats.1991, Ch. 1183.) 65850.5. The legislative body of any city or cXnty shall ,riot enact an ordinance which has the effect of prohibiting or of unreasonably restricting the useeof solar energy systems other than for the preservation or protection of the public health or safety. This pr iibition shall be applicable to charter cities since the promotion of the use of nonfossil fuel sources of�eriergy, such as solar energy and energy conservation measures, is a matter of statewide concern. This section shall not apply to ordinances which impos asonable restrictions on solar energy systems. However, it is the policy of the state to promote and encoura the use of solar energy systems and to remove obstacles thereto. Accordingly, reasonable restrictions on a so energy system are those restrictions which do not significantly increase the cost of the system or significantl decrease its efficiency, or which allow for an alternative system of comparable cost and efficiency. For the purposes of this section, "solar energy system" shall have th same meaning as set forth in Section l 801.5 of the Civil Code. (Added by Stats.1978, Ch., 154.) 65851. For such purposes the legislative body may divide a county, a city, or portions thereof, into zones of the number, shape and area it deems best suited to carry out the purpose of this ch pier. (Added by Stats. 1945, Ch. 1880.) 65852. All such regulations shall be uniform for each class or kind of building or use f land throughout each zone, but the regulation in one type of zone may differ from those in other types of nes. (Repealed anp"added by Stats. 1965, Ch.1880.) 65852.1. Notwithstanding Section 65906, any city, including a charter city, county, or city ana`county may issue a zoning variance, special use permit, or conditional use permit for a dwelling unit to be cons eted,orwhich is attached to or detached from, a primary residence on a parcel zoned for a single-family res ence, if the dwelling unit is intended for the sole occupancy of one adult or two adult persons who are 62 y of age or over, and the area of floor space of the attached dwelling unit does not exceed 30 percent of the xisting !iv' g area or the area of the floor space of the detached dwelling unit does not exceed 1,200 square eet. This section shall not be construed to limit the requirements of Section 65852.2, or the power of 1 al governments to permit second units. (Amended by S C /; :u•.i•, I I., , 65852.2. (a) Any local agency may, by ordinance, provide for the creation of second units in single-family and multifamily residential zones consistent with all of the following provisions: (1) Areas may be designated within the jurisdiction of the local agency where second units may be permitted. (2).The designation of areas may be based on criteria, which may include, but are not limited to, the adequacy of water and sewer services and the impact of second units on traffic flow. (3) Standards may be imposed on second units which include, but are not limited to, parking, height, setback, lot coverage, architectural review, and maximum size of a unit. (4) A local agency may find that second units do not exceed the allowable density for the lot upon which the second unit is located, and that second units area residential use that is consistent with the existing general 56 • 1992 Planning, Zoning, and Development Laws The Planning and Zoning Law plan and zoning designation for the lot. • (5) The second units created shall not be considered in the application of any local ordinance, policy, or program to limit residential growth. (6) A local agency may establish a process for the issuance of a conditional use permit for second units. (b) When a local agency which has not adopted an ordinance governing second units in accordance with subdivision (a) or (c), receives its first application on or after July 1, 1983, for a conditional use permit pursuant to this subdivision, the local agency shall accept the application and approve or disapprove the application pursuant to this subdivision unless it adopts an ordinance in accordance with subdivision (a) or (c) within 120 days after receiving the application. Notwithstanding Section 65901, every local agency shall grant a special use or a conditional use permit for the creation of a second unit if the second unit complies with all of the following: (1) The unit is not intended for sale and may be rented. (2) The lot is zoned for single-family or multifamily use. (3) The lot contains an existing single-family dwelling. (4) The second unit is either attached to the existing dwelling and located within the living area of the existing dwelling or detached from the existing dwelling and located on the same lot as the existing dwelling. (5) Any increase in the floor area of an attached second unit shall not exceed 30 percent of the existing living area. (6) The total area of floor space for a detached second unit shall not exceed 1,200 square feet. (7) Any construction shall conform to height, setback, lot coverage, architectural review, site plan review, fees, charges, and other zoning requirements generally applicable to residential construction in the zone in which the property is located. (8) Local building code requirements which apply to detached dwellings, as appropriate. (9) Approval by the local health officer where a private sewage disposal system is being used, if required. No other local ordinance, policy, or regulation shall be the basis for the denial of a building permit or a use permit under this subdivision. This subdivision establishes the maximum standards that local agencies shall use to evaluate proposed second units on lots zoned for residential use which contain an existing single-family dwelling. No additional standards, other than those provided in this subdivision or subdivision (a), shall be utilized or imposed, except that a local agency may require an applicant for a permit issued pursuant to this subdivision to be an owner - occupant. This section does not limit the authority of local agencies to adopt less restrictive requirements for the creation of second units. No changes in zoning ordinances or other ordinances or any changes in the general plan shall be required to implement this subdivision. Any local agency may amend its zoning ordinance or general plan to incorporate the policies, procedures, or other provisions applicable to the creation of second units if these provisions are consistent with the limitations of this subdivision. A second unit which conforms to the requirements of this subdivision shall not be considered to exceed the allowable density for the lot upon which it is located, and shall be deemed to be a residential use which is consistent with the existing general plan and zoning designations for the lot. The second units shall not be considered in the application of any local ordinance, policy, or program to limit residential growth. (c) No local agency shall adopt an ordinance which totally precludes second units within single-family and multifamily zoned areas unless the ordinance contains findings acknowledging that the ordinance may limit housing opportunities of the region and further contains findings that specific adverse impacts on the public health, safety, and welfare that would result from allowing second units within single-family and multifamily zoned areas justify adopting the ordinance. (d) Local agencies shall submit a copy of the ordinances adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) or (c) to the Department of Housing and Community Development within 60 days after adoption. (c) As used in this section, the following terms mean: (1) "Living arca," means the interior habitable area of a dwelling unit including basements and attics but docs not include a garage or any accessory structure. (2) "Local agency" means a city, county, or city and. county, whether general law or chartered. (3) "Second unit" means an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as the single-family dwelling is situated. Note: Stats. 1986, Ch. 156, also reads: — SEC. 2. This act shall become operative April 1, 1987. (Added by Stats. 1982, Ch. 1440. Effective July 1, 1983; Amended by Stats. 1986, Ch. 156; Amended by Stats. 1990, Ch. 1150.) Standards to evaluate proposed second residential units Necessary findings for ordinance prohibiting second units Definitions Timing 43 1992 Planning, Zoning, and Development Laws • S7 ,1 :.+ _....... a...„.%eyo.44 It;: tyt..ae[.1..:..cix,/ iS `4621b__-ar> CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of thenCity Council FROM: Ken Robertson, Associate Plann kL / SUBJECT: Text Amendment 92-4 - Staff Report Correction DATE: December 14, 1992 Attached is a corrected page 1 of the staff report. The only correction is in the first paragraph under Background, to reflect that the Council's previous vote on this item was 4:1, not 5:0, with Councilmember Wiemans objecting. Attachment SUPPLEMENTAL. INFORMATION 5 v,..:c-..i^w, r.ei,....si.il::.ie.,..r:..l't.4-:S.10,::4.1CL.6.141.1f.i ..la4444448.4.4.110.14411140.11 December 7, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council December 15, 1992 (CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 10, 1992) SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 92-4 PURPOSE: TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR OR PROHIBIT SECOND UNITS PURSUANT TO STATE CODE 65852.2 INITIATED BY STAFF Planning Commission Recommendation To prohibit second units by introducing the attached ordinance which includes a provision that if the prohibition is invalidated by a court of law a regulatory ordinance, as previously recommended, becomes effective. Staff Alternative Staff continues to prefer the safer position to adopt the regulatory ordinance to allow second units only in very limited situations. Staff and the Planning Commission previously recommended requiring a C.U.P., and allowing only on lots of a minimum of 6700 square feet with a maximum 600 square -foot unit size. Background At the meeting of November 10, 1992, the City Council considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission to establish requirements for allowing second units. The Council voted 4:1 to send the proposed ordinance back to the Planning Commission and directed staff to survey other cities and case law and then prepare an ordinance, with appropriate findings, to. totally preclude second units. At their meeting of December 1, 1992, the Planning Commission recommended adoption of an ordinance to preclude second units, with a provision that if invalidated by a court of law that the regulatory ordinance (allowing second units on lots of 6700 square feet or more) would become effective in its place. For further background information please refer to the attached staff reports and minutes. Analysis - Staff has conducted a survey of all 86 cities in L.A. County with 74 responding, as requested, and found that the majority of - 1 - ..,....:...... •.......a. . /(c -/d4;66 December 2, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Member of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of December 15, 1992 1991-92 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (Including Report from Independent Auditor) Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the 1991-92 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), which includes the report from Coopers and Lybrand, our independent auditors. Background Annually the City has a financial audit performed by an independent certified public accounting firm. The City Council awarded the contract for audit services to Coopers and Lybrand in May 1990. This is the fourth year that the more comprehensive report has been prepared in accordance with guidelines provided by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) and all applicable accounting standards. Last year, for the second time, the City's report received the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the GFOA. The City also received the the Certificate of Award for Outstanding Financial Reporting from the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) for the third time. The award programs require a high level of compliance with governmental standards and inclusion of information well beyond the general purpose financial statements. The 1991-92 CAFR has again been submitted to both of the associations for participation in the award programs since the awards are valid for one year only. Analysis The auditor's report is on page 1 behind the second divider labeled "Financial Section". The City received an unqualified opinion for the fifth time. An unqualified opinion indicates that the auditor believes the financial statements present a fair picture of the financial position of the City, as opposed to a qualified opinion, in which the auditor "qualifies" or limits his opinion for specific reasons, such as lack of fixed asset accounting or significant internal control deficiencies. Only CAFRs with unqualified opinions are reviewed for the award programs mentioned above. The following analysis deals with the General Fund, which is the main operating fund of the City. Additional analysis of all governmental funds is included in the Transmittal Letter on page vii at the front of the CAFR. General Fund Revenue Revenue estimates in the General Fund were on target; revenue received was 1% over budget and 1.71% higher than revenue received in 1990-91. General Fund Inc/Dec Percent Percent 1991-92 Over 90-91 Inc/Dec of Total Property Taxes $3,478,742 $252,608 7.83% 40.00% Sales Tax 1,494,090 (175,610) -10.52% 17.18% Other Tax 1,526,816 279,450 22.40% 17.56% Licenses and Permits 212,552 (60,392) -22.13% 2.44% Fines and Forfeitures 116,221 (119,383) -50.67% 1.34% Use of Money and Property 394,844 142,329 56.36% 4.54% Intergovern- mental Revenue 755,049 (89,331) -10.58% 8.68% Charges For Services 466,897 6,280 1.36% 5.37% Miscellaneous 48,192 (51,879) -51.84% .55% Interest 203,404 (37,726) -15.65% 2.34% Total $8,696,807 $146,346 1.71% 100.00% Property tax and sales tax comprise 47% of General Fund revenue. Secured and unsecured property tax increased by 8% and 5%, respectively, making property tax the City's most stable source of income, even in a stagnant real estate market. Transfer tax (the tax on property turnovers) declined by 11%; the number of turnovers declined by 34%. Sales tax receipts declined 11% from last year and 15% over the past two years. Since sales tax comprises approximately 17% of General Fund revenue and is the City's second largest revenue source, we must recognize that the loss of business without the same level and type tax -generating replacements will necessitate budget adjustments, possibly in the form of a reduction in services. The table below displays information for the largest classes of businesses in 91/92 (representing 75% of the sales tax) and the change from the previous year. Rank/Business Class 91/92 Sales Tax By Class % of % of Change Rank 91/92 Total Prey. Year Prev. Year 1 Eating/Drinking Places $293,693 21.57% 7.12% 2 2 Auto Dealers 273,744 20.10% -32.18% 1 3 *Grocery Stores 182,275 13.39% 10.46% 3 4 Specialty Stores 88,014 6.46% 8.71% 5 5 Lumber/Building materials 70,082 5.15% -14.85% 4 6 Sporting Goods/ Bicycles 62,791 4.61% 35.84% 7 7 Service Stations 44,599 3.28% -16.25% 6 *Loss of Alpha Beta not reflected until 92/93 The Other Tax category reflects a 22% increase due to the accounting change in recording of property tax receipts. Without that change, the increase is 7% and is attributable to higher business license, refuse franchise and cable TV franchise receipts. a - 3 - x e..dMd. General Fund Expenditures Expenditures Inc/Dec Percent Percent 1991-92 Over 90-91 Inc/Dec Of Total Current: Legislative/ Legal $ 485,125 $141,517 41.19% 4.38% General Government 2,642,673 394,308 17.54% 23.87% Public Safety 4,983,285 298,295 6.37% 45.01% Community Development 619,210 57,387 10.21% 5.59% Culture/ Recreation 647,304 (14,921) -2.25% 5.85% Public Works 1,094,084 67,607 6.59% 9.88% Sanitation 339,981 15,747 4.86% 3.07% Debt Service: Principal 194,095 (22,232) -10.28% 1.75% Interest 26,414 (9,315) -26.07% .25% Capital Outlay 39,064 54,339 -355.74% 0.35% Total $11,071,235 $ 982,732 9.74% 100.00% General Fund expenditures were less than 1% under budget and 10% higher than last year. As would be expected, the largest category of expenditure- is Public Safety (45.01%), which increased by 6%. The second largest category, General Government, includes insurance and retirement benefits for employees. The category overall rose by 18%, most of which is related to retirement benefits. In the prior year the City had a surplus of retirement assets which were taken as a credit against expenditures, thereby skewing the year to year comparison. Adjusting the numbers for that difference brings the category increase to 9%. Operating department expenditures in the category rose by only 3%. Legislative/Legal expenditures rose substantially, due, in large part, to increased legal fees relating to negotiations for voter approved oil drilling in the City Yard site. General Fund Comparison 1984-93 The chart below shows a graphic presentation of revenue/expenditure trends for 1984-93 and the fund balance as a percent of expenditures. w c 0 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 GENERAL FUND COMPARISON 1984-93 Revenue, Expenditures, Fund Balance 83/84 84/85 85/86 86/87 87/89 89/90 90/91 91/92 92/91 FUND BALANCE A REVENUE x EXPENDITURES Revenue/Expenditure Trends The City has maintained a positive trend (with revenue -exceeding expenditures) for most years from 1984 to 1992. In 1989-90, expenditures were higher because over a million dollars was transferred and earmarked for the purchase of the railroad right of way property. In 1991-92, the City used a variety of tactics to maintain service levels while facing revenue shortfalls created by the economy and the state. In revising the 1991-92 budget, the City used a combination of revenue increases, expenditure reductions and carryover funds to offset the budget shortfall - without significantly reducing service levels and still maintaining reasonable reserves. The negative trend experienced in 91/92 is closed in 92/93 by adopting a balanced budget. In a declining economy, desired levels of service will be increasingly more difficult to maintain. However, a few bright spots are on the revenue horizon with the new Ralph's Supermarket and the new Harbor Hotel, as well as potential positive impact from RUDAT implementation. General Fund Fund Balance Fund balance as a percent of expenditures is a measure of the City's cushion against economic uncertainties or revenue shortfalls. Bond rating agencies commonly consider at least a 5% reserve "prudent"; level of reserves is, of course, a subjective and individual decision for each city. The General Fund ending fund balance did decline in 1991-92 for two reasons: $500,000 was transferred out for the purchase of South School and carryover funds from the previous year were used to balance the budget in June 1991. As the chart shows, the City began building a reasonable fund balance in 1985 and has maintained well over 10% over the past several years. Midyear Budget Review is just around the corner and will provide the next opportunity to review our financial picture. Natalie LaBran, the manager of our audit, will be present at the meeting. Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Viki Cleland Finance Director The report is available for review in the library and the Finance Department. December 9, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 15, 1992 AUDITOR REVIEW OF APPROPRIATION LIMITS, INTERNAL CONTROLS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file 1. the review of the 1991-92 Appropriation Limitation submitted by the City's auditor, Coopers and Lybrand. 2. the review of internal controls submitted by the City's auditor, Coopers and Lybrand. Background: Article XIII B of the California Constitution (commonly known as the Gann Limitation) requires adoption of an annual appropriation limitation. The 1991-92 limit was adopted by City Council on May 28, 1991. Proposition 111, which was passed by the voters in June 1990, requires the City to conduct a review of the appropriation limit during the annual financial audit. The review of internal controls is a routine part of the audit. Analysis: REVIEW OF APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT The auditor's review of the 91/92 appropriations limit determined that, as far as their procedures provide, appropriate procedures were followed in determining and adopting the limit. REVIEW OF INTERNAL CONTROLS Current Year Comments Staff and the City Treasurer concur that upgrade of the City's financial software would be of great benefit and recommend that such an upgrade be considered as part of the City's overall data processing plan. Status of Prior Year Comments 'Staff has experienced problems with the fixed assets system since it was installed during fiscal year 1987-88. The Fixed Asset System was one of the applications purchased from a vendor who 1 .. ._ w.,..k.w.,4..: gam; 6h went bankrupt. The system was installed by our contract programmer, so virtually no training was given. The manual that came with the system does not address all problems encountered and of course no updates are available. The staff felt, however, that the implementation of a fixed asset system was valuable for control purposes and to enable the City to receive an unqualified audit opinion even though we realized problems would exist. Modifications to the system will be explored to determine the upgrade cost, however an upgrade of software will likely be the most feasible and cost effective option given that the software is (��15+ years old. �""""•� Viki Copeland Gary Br 's h Finance Director City Tr-asurer Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager audit/aplimit - 2 - Coopers &Lybrand certified public accountants The Honorable City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California: We have applied the procedures enumerated below to the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6 of the City of Hermosa Beach for the year ended June 30, 1992. These procedures, which were agreed to by the League of California Cities and presented in their Article XIIB Appropriations Limitation Uniform Guidelines, were performed solely to assist you in meeting the requirements of Section 1.5 of Article XIIB of the California Constitution. This report is intended for the information of management and the City Council. This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a matter of public records. The procedures performed and our findings were as follows: 1. We obtained the completed worksheets (#1 through #7) presented in the Article XIIB Appropriations Limitation Uniform Guidelines (or other alternative computations), and determined that the limit and annual adjustment factors were adopted by resolution of the City Council. We also determined that the population and inflation options were selected by a recorded vote of the City Council. 2. For the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6, we added line A, last year's limit, to line E, total adjustments, and agreed the resulting amount to line F, this year's limit. 3. We agreed the current year appropriations limit presented in the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6 to the other worksheets described in #1 above. 4. We agreed the prior year appropriations limit presented in the accompanying Appropriations limit worksheet #6 to the prior year appropriations limit adopted by the City Council during the prior year. These agreed-upon procedures are substantially less in scope than an audit, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion on the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6. Accord- ingly, we do not express such an opinion. 1 Based on the application of the procedures referred to above, except for the findings noted above, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6 was not computed in accordance with Article XIIB of the California Constitution. Had we performed additional procedures or had we made an audit of the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6 and the other completed worksheets described in #1 above, matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you. Cov-ptzt drit-ts.ped_ Los Angeles, California September 28, 1992 2 K� n •- • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1991-92 BUDGET CALCULATION OF APPROPRIATION LIMIT LIMITATION FOR 1986-87 FISCAL YEAR $ 8,609,437 1987-88: PER CAPITA CHANGE = 3.47% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POPULATION CHANGE = 1988-89: 1.91% PER CAPITA CHANGE = 4.66% CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH POPULATION CHANGE = 1989-90: 1.81% PER CAPITA CHANGE = 5.19% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POPULATION CHANGE = 1990-91: 1.14% PER CAPITA CHANGE = 4.21% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POPULATION CHANGE = 1991-92: 1.36% PER CAPITA CHANGE = 4.14% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POPULATION CHANGE = 1.73% LIMITATION FOR 1991-92 FISCAL YEAR $11,513,297 - �. . ., may..,.. �.�.a..�..... Coopers &Lybrand September 28, 1992 certified public accountants 350 South Grand Avenue Post Office Box 17919 Los Angeles, Ca 90071-3405 telephone (213) 356-6000 fax (213) 356-6363 in principal areas of the world To The Honorable City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California Dear City Council Members: In planning and performing our audit of the general purpose financial statements of the City of Hermosa Beach ("City") for the year ended June 30, 1992, we considered the City's internal control structure in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements. Although our audit was not designed to provide assurance on the internal control structure, we noted certain matters involving the internal control structure and its operation, and are submitting for your consideration related recommendations designed to help the City make improvements and achieve operational efficiencies. Our comments reflect our desire to be of continuing assistance to the City. Certain of these matters may be considered reportable conditions, as defined by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, which involve matters coming to our attention, relating to significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal control structure, that could adversely affect the organization's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data consistent with the assertions of management in the financial statements. The accompanying comments and recommendations are intended solely for the information and use of the City Council, management, and other third parties as determined by the City's policy. Very truly yours, 4 -• Current Year Comment The City's computer system is cumbersome to use and does not provide sufficient report writing capability. As a result information needed for operational and reporting purposes cannot be obtained from the system. Further, excessive manual effort is needed to maintain the investment activity, the fixed asset records and reconcile the accounts payable. We recommend that a new computerized general ledger be implemented to: • provide for more efficient operations; • eliminate manual recordkeeping; • accumulate data needed for financial statements disclosures; • eliminate unidentified differences between subsidiary ledgers and corresponding general ledger accounts. STATUS OF PRIOR YEAR'S COMMENTS Observation: The Fixed Asset Summary for the Central Fixed Asset Account Group did not readily reconcile to the general ledger. A lengthy reconciliation process was required. The reconciliation process was complicated by difficulty of maintaining an audit trail with the current fixed asset software and the inflexibility of the fixed asset reporting system. Recommendation: In order to expedite review reporting of the fixed assets for the City's financial statements, we recommend that a complete reconciliation of the fixed asset system to the general ledger be performed at least annually. In addition, until a new fixed asset system is acquired or the existing system modified, manual records should be kept to minimize the record keeping deficiencies existing in the system. Current Year Status: Not implemented - see current year comments. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FROM: Michael Schubach, P1'annll' g"rector SUBJECT: Re -striping of Public Parking to Create Additional Parking to Compensate for Ralph's Proposed Remodel and Addition LOCATION: Park Pacific Shopping Center Parking Lot, Adjacent to Greenwood Park DATE: December 8, 1992 As the Council is aware, Ralph's Grocery Store is planning to open in the Park Pacific Plaza Shopping Center (1100 P.C.H.) in the old Alpha Beta location. As part of their proposed remodeling some additional square footage will be added in the mezzanine area (a net increase of 1100 square feet). In order to meet parking requirements to add 4 more spaces, Mr. Bacon, the owner of the shopping center, is proposing to reconfigure and restripe the parking lot, including the use of compact size stalls, to add four more parking spaces. Normally this proposed change would not require any City Council action; however, Mr. Bacon's plan includes changing standard stalls to compact stalls adjacent to Greenwood Park on city owned property. The shopping center has historically been able to use this parking through a "non-exclusive" agreement with the city. Thus, changing this_ parking to compact parking requires City Council approval. Staff ,is concerned about making all of these public spaces which supply parking for the use of the park, compact stall size. One possible solution would be approval of the proposed re -striping, if modified to make some of the parking along Greenwood Park standard size (at least one-third). Staff has calculated that up to 12 standard stalls could be located along the park while only resulting in the loss of one parking space (25 total instead of 26 along the park on city property). However, this resolution would require the addition of one parking space elsewhere on the parking lot, or an interpretation that the• difference of one space is minor and no parking plan amendment is necessary (note: the shopping center already has an approved Parking Plan for reduced parking). Other possible solutions are as follows: 1. Obtain Planning Commission approval for a Parking Plan Amendment for the small addition to Ralph's, and reducing or eliminating the need for compact stalls. 2. Allow park users with standard size vehicles to park in the private portion of the parking lot (an agreement to post signs to this effect would have to be entered into with Mr. Bacon) 3. Redistribute the proposed compact parking throughout the lot, eliminating the need for compact parking in the public portion. CO UR: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager p/memo3 December 7, 7, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 15, 1992 COST SHARING AGREEMENT ON ACCESS MODIFICATIONS AT PARK PACIFIC SHOPPING CENTER ROGER BACON Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council direct the Public Works staff to proceed with plans to design and construct the access modifications at Park pacific Shopping Center as a city contract. Background: In September the City Council agreed to share 50% of the cost of the access modifications at the Park Pacific Shopping Center up to a maximum of one half of $35,000. An agreement has been prepared whereby Roger Bacon would secure bids, hire the contractor and administer the contract. The city and the State would inspect the project and upon satisfactory completion payment would be made to Roger Bacon. This would have been the most expeditious approach to accomplishing the project and would have required the least elapsed time. However, Mr. Bacon objects to Article 10.1 INDEMNIFICATION in the agreement and has declined to execute it. Therefor, in order to accommodate Mr. Bacon, it will be necessary for the city staff to undertake those things which would otherwise be done by him. In consideration of other priorities within the Public Works Department, the following is the probable schedule which would apply. Prepare RFP's, review responses and execute contract with private consulting engineer 2 months Consulting Engineer prepare plans and speci- fications, City and State check and approve 2 months City advertise for bids 1 month Council approve bids and contractor execute contract 1 month Contractor. Perform work 2 months It is understood that delays beyond January 30, 1992, would be costing Mr. Bacon $1,500 per day because of his contract with his prospective tenant. It would be necessary for Mr. Bacon to deposit with the City any sums of money required before the city commits to any expenditures for engineering and construction. Also city engineering costs will be charged at the overhead rate for administration and inspection. The agreement would be modified to eliminate the contractual responsibilities but still provide for construction cost sharing between Mr. Bacon and the city. Alternative: Require that Mr. Bacon execute the contract (on a take -it -or -leave -it -basis) on the following grounds: a. This is the course of action which he preferred initially when the Public Works Director, in the course of seeking proposals for the work, learned that Mr. Bacon was also seeking proposals and recognizing that we couldn't both be soliciting proposals, suggested that Mr. Bacon administer the project. b. The city's legal selection of an (one) engineer and possible disengagement of the engineers (two) which Mr. Bacon has already hired could be somewhat of a snarl. One of the engineers has already submitted plans for part of the work to the city for approval. c. Delays which Mr. Bacon may claim the city has caused him if the city administers the contract could conceivably have a dollar value of $360,000 ($1,500 X 240 days = $360„000). d. The project which Mr. Bacon wishes to accomplish is for his benefit and it is not unreasonable for him to indemnify the city in the process. Respectfully su}?mitted, Charles McDonald Director of Public Works Viki Copeland Director of Finance Attachment: Agreement ty/cmcsa - 2 Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager City of 21ermosaTeacly November 23, 1992 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Mr. Roger Bacon P.O. Box 282 Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Dear Mr. Bacon; Enclosed is a copy of the proposed agreement for cost sharing and construction of the modifications to improve access from Pacific Coast Highway to your property at Park Pacific Shopping Center. Please sign and return the agreement. It will be agendized for approval by the City Council at their meeting of December 15, 1992. Upon execution, a copy of the agreement will be returned to you for your files. Please provide a project schedule, mark it "Exhibit B" and attach it to the agreement. Copies of the insurance certificates will be required prior to starting work. A certificate for the low bid contractor to execute will be forwarded under separate cover. When plans have been approved by the City, we will apply to the State for the encroachment permit. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Since Ly, J Lhdrles tic onald✓ Director of Public Works ty/cmrb PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT This PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ("AGREEMENT") is made as of this day of , 1992, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"), having its offices at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254 and , having his office at , California (hereinafter referred to as "OWNER". RECITALS 1. The Owner desires to have constructed for the benefit of his property at certain public improvements within the public right of way. The proposed project ("project") is expected to consist of the construction of driveways, curb, gutter, sidewalk and signalization, as more precisely shown in the preliminary plans attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. In order to expedite the project, City desires to allow the Owner to perform management related duties relating to the pre - construction and construction of the project in return for the City's partial participation in the funding of the project improvements. It is the intent of this Agreement to comply with the required public bidding procedures applicable to a project of this type. This contract is not to be construed as a general construction contract. THE OWNER AND CITY HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE 1 OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES The Owner covenants with the City to further the interests of the City for this public project by agreeing to furnish business administration and management services in an expeditious and economical manner consistent with the interest of the City. BASIC RESPONSIBILITIES 1.1 The Owner's basic services shall consist of the responsibilities described below. 12598 1. Provide for a project schedule that coordinates and integrates the Owner's responsibilities with anticipated preconstruction and construction schedules. Attached hereto as Exhibit "B", and incorporated herein by this reference, is the Project Schedule. Any and all modifications or changes to this Project Schedule are required to be approved by the City Council. 1.1.2 Hire a Registered Civil Engineer to prepare construction plans and specifications for the project; also secure approval of the plans from Caltrans and the City. 1.1.3 Coordinate contract documents by consulting with the City regarding drawings and specifications as they are being prepared, and recommend reasonable alternative solutions wherever possible affecting construction feasibility, cost or schedules. 1.1.4 Coordinate with utility companies, transit company, other affected agencies to resolve potential conflicts. 1.1.5 Prepare for the City's approval a detailed estimate of construction cost, developed by using estimating techniques which anticipate the various elements of the project, and based on schematic design documents prepared by the Engineer. 1.1.6 Solicit certified bids from three licensed contractors, certified in accordance with Exhibit "C", attached. Certified bids shall be submitted to City Council for approval before award by the owner. Owner will contract directly with and be responsible for the payment of the contractor. 1.1.7 Prepare bid analysis and make recommendations to the City for award of contract or rejection of bids. 1.2 The Owner shall provide administration of the contracts for construction as set forth below. 1.2.1 Provide administrative, management and related services as required to coordinate work of the contractor with the activities and responsibilities of the Owner and the City to complete the project in accordance with the City's objectives for cost, time and quality and to carry out the requirements of this Agreement. 12598 2 1.2.2 It is the Owner's responsibility to coordinate and manage performance from contractor and to take appropriate courses of action when requirements of the contract are not being fulfilled. 1.2.3 Maintain cost accounting records on authorized work performed on the basis of actual costs of labor and materials and certify to City. 1.2.4 Recommend necessary or desirable project changes to the City. 1.2.5 Determine that the work of the contractor is being performed in accordance with the requirements of the contract documents, and use reasonable efforts to guard the City against defects and deficiencies in the work. As appropriate, require special inspection or testing, or make recommendations to the City regarding special inspection or testing, of work not in accordance with the provisions of the contract documents whether or not such work be then fabricated installed or completed. Subject to review by the City, reject work which does not conform to the requirements of the contract documents. 1.2.6 Receive certificates of insurance from the contractor, and forward them to the City. 1.2.7 Obtain from the contractor and review all shop drawings and transmit them to the Engineer for approval or disapproval. 1.2.8 The extent of the duties, responsibilities and limitation of authority of the Owner as an independent contractor to the City during construction shall not be modified or extended without the written consent of the City. ARTICLE 2 CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 The City has designated the Director of the Public Works, and his designee, as the representative authorized to act in the City's behalf with respect to the project. The City, or such authorized representative, shall examine documents submitted by the Owner and shall render decisions pertaining thereto (including approval of construction documents) promptly to 12598 3 . avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of the Owner's responsibilities. 2.2 The City shall furnish the required information and services and shall render approvals and decisions as expeditiously as necessary for the orderly progress of the Project and the work of the contractors. 2.3 Upon completion of the project and compliance with the bidding requirements, City will pay to Owner an amount equal to Fifty Percent (50%) of the cost of the project, not to exceed a maximum payment by City in the amount of $17,500. ARTICLE 3 PAYMENTS TO THE OWNER The City shall compensate the Owner, consistent with the other terms and conditions of this agreement, as follows: 3.1 City shall compensate Owner a total of Fifty Percent (50%) of the total cost of the project, not to exceed the total sum of Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($17,500.00), which amount includes the payment set forth in paragraph 2.3. 3.2 Payments are due and payable thirty (30) days after the date of receipt of the Owner's invoice, which shall not be sent until after the completion of construction and acceptance of the public improvements by City. ARTICLE 4 OWNER'S ACCOUNTING 4.1 The Owner shall keep such full and detailed accounts and records as may be necessary for proper financial management under this Agreement, and the system shall be satisfactory to the City. The City shall be afforded access to and the right to copy and audit all the Owner's records, books, correspondence, instructions, receipts, invoices, memoranda and similar data relating to the cost of the project under this agreement. 12598 4. ARTICLE 5 LEGAL ACTION 5.1 In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may institute legal action to cure, correct, or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purpose of this Agreement. Such legal actions must be instituted and maintained in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, in any other appropriate court in that County, or in the Federal District Court in the Central District of California. 5.2 The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement. 5.3 Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. ARTICLE 6 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 6.1 If either party should fail to comply with any material provision of this agreement, the other party may inform the defaulting party by written notice of its intent to terminate the agreement unless the defaulting party cures the default within thirty (30) calendar days. Upon the failure of the defaulting party to cure the default within said period the agreement may be immediately terminated. 6.2 In the event of termination not the fault of the Owner, the Owner shall be compensated for an amount equal to Fifty Percent (50%) of the costs of the project incurred as of the date of the notice of termination (not to exceed the sum of $17,500) in accordance with the project schedule or authorized prior to the termination date. 12598 5. ARTICLE 7 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 7.1 The Owner and the City, respectively, bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party to this agreement, and to the partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants to this agreement. Neither the Owner nor the City shall assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. ARTICLE 8 EXTENT OF AGREEMENT 8.1 This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Owner and the City and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements between the parties, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the Owner and the City. 8.2 Nothing contained herein shall be construed as creating the relationship of employer and employees between the parties hereto or agent and principal, and the Owner shall be deemed at all times to be an independent contractor with respect to its performance hereunder. ARTICLE 9 INSURANCE 9.1 The Owner or Contractor shall procure and maintain in effect during the term of this Agreement the following insurance coverages with an insurance company or companies authorized to do business in the State of California and approved by the City: 9.1.1 Workers' compensation and occupational disease insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 12598 6. 9.1.2 Comprehensive general liability including personal injury and property damage in the amount of a combined single limit of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) each occurrence. 9.1.3 Comprehensive auto liability including personal injury and property damage in the amount of a combined single limit of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00). Coverage must include the following: Owned vehicles Leased vehicles Hired vehicles Non -owned vehicles 9.2 The Owner shall furnish the City with certificate of insurance evidencing all such coverages and certificates evidencing renewal thereof before expiration of the coverage of the policy in question. Such certificates shall be provided on a form approved by the City. The City may also request the Owner to provide it with copies of the actual policies for its review. In the event the Owner fails to provide any certificate when due, the City may, but shall not be required to, obtain such coverage and deduct any costs in connection therewith from any sums due the Owner from the City or seek reimbursement for same from the Owner, which sum shall be due and payable immediately on receipt by the Owner of notice from the City. In the event the City has to initiate legal action for recovery of same, the Owner shall pay all costs and reasonable attorneys' fees in connection therewith provided however, such judgment is in favor of City. 9.3 The City and Owner shall give prompt written notice to the other party of all losses, damages, or injuries to any person or to property of the Owner, City or of third persons which may be in any way related to the Project or for which a claim might be made against either party. The City and Owner shall promptly report to the other party all such claims of which either party has noticed, whether related to matters insured or uninsured. No settlement or payment for any claim for loss, injury or damage or other matter as to which any party may be charged shall be made without the prior written approval of such party. 9.4 The insurance provided by Owner shall be primary to any coverage available to City, except for claims which involve Contractors that are directly contracted with the Owner. In those instances, the Contractor's insurance shall be primary. The •insurance policies shall name City as an additional insured and shall include provisions for waiver of subrogation. 12598 7. 9.5 The City may, at its option, terminate this Agreement or withhold payments as a result of non-compliance with the above insurance requirements. ARTICLE 10 OTHER CONDITIONS OR SERVICES 10.1 INDEMNIFICATION Owner agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, City Council and each member thereof, and every officer and employee of City, from any and all liability or financial loss resulting from any suits, claims, losses or actions brought by any person or persons and from all costs and expenses of litigation brought against City, City Council, and each member hereof, or any officer, employee, or agent of the City, by reason of injury to any person or persons, including, but not limited to officers and employees of City, or damage, destruction, or loss of property of any kind whatsoever, including, but not limited to, that of the Owner, resulting directly or indirectly from any or all wrongful or negligent activities and operations of Owner or any person employed by Owner in the performance of this Agreement. 10.2 NOTICES The Owner shall comply with and give notices required by laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and lawful orders of public authorities bearing on construction of the Project. 10.2.1 It is the Owner's responsibility to ascertain that the construction contracts are in accordance with applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, building codes, and rules and regulations then in effect. 10.2.2 If the Owner allows work to be performed with actual knowledge that it is contrary to laws, statutes, ordinances, building codes, and rules and regulations Owner shall assume full liability for such work and shall bear the attributable costs. 12598 8. This Agreement entered into as of the day and year first written above. Date: "OWNER" By: Date: "CITY" CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH By: Mayor Attest: Approved as to form: Date: By: City Attorney 12 598 9. 10TH STREET 11TH STREET PACIFIC COAST I IIGI IWAY REMOVE MARKING 7EXTEND MARKING 11TH PLACE NEW CURB LINE REMOVE STOP SIGN SR1) INSTALL SIGNAL POLI WITH "NO RIGHT TURN ON RED" GREEN ARROW PHASE AT SAME TIME AS GREEN. REMOVE MEDIAN ISLANDS DRIVEWAY 260' EAST OF P.C.H. CURBLINE. AUBRY CT. 360' EAST OF P.C.H. CURBLINE. AVIATION AVENUE 40' RELOCATE DRIVEWAY ALPHA BETA CENTER DRIVEWAY "EXHIBIT A" PIER AVENUE 13TH STREET 14TH STRE "EXHIBIT C" Owner shall accomplish the following: 1. Secure from a Registered Civil Engineer a single set of plans and specifications. 2. Secure approval of the plans and specifications from the City and Caltrans. 3. Publish Notice Inviting Bids in Easy Reader twice at least 5 days apart. State Code 20164. 4. Bidders shall provide a 10% bid bond. State Code 20170. 5. Contractor shall furnish a performance bond. City Code 2-57. 6. When plans and specifications are approved by the City Council, the Owner may advertise for bids. 7. Sealed bids shall be submitted to the City Clerk to be opened publicly in the City Council Chambers at the time specified in the notice to contractors. 8. Bids shall be reported to the City Council for approval before award by Owner. 9. Upon approval by City Council, Owner may award contract to lowest bidder. ty/cmexc - 1 - December 3, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 15, 1992 THE STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH, CIP 90-144 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Path CIP 90-144, authorize staff to call for bids and to issue addenda as necessary. Plans and specifications are on file in the City Clerk and Public Works offices. Background: Plans were last presented to the City Council on February 11, 1992. At that time the Council directed the staff to seek a time extension on the TDA grants and directed the Planning Commission to make a General Plan Amendment to redesignate the bike path from 24th Street to the north end of the Strand and delete it from Hermosa Avenue in order to be eligible for TDA funds to repair the entire strand. The Resolution of Intent to amend the General Plan was received and filed by Council when brought back by staff on February 25, 1992. The Council also desired to allow the new City Manager to be involved with the project. A time extension has been received on the TDA funds which allows until June 30, 1993 to execute a contract for the work. The plans and specifications have been carefully reviewed in the office and in the field; ambiguities, redundancies and inconsistencies, have been eliminated. PROJECT ANALYSIS: Funding: #1 TDA Regional Grand Received $411,000 #2 TDA Regional Grant Received 399,011 #3 TDA Regional Grant Received 218,000 Earned Interest on Regional Grants 99,290 $1,127,301 Less expenditures to date - 3,681 $1,123,620 TDA Local Fund Balance 1,377 #1 TDA Local Grant Received 40,568 #2 TDA Local Grant Received 5,656 #3 TDA Local Grant Received 4,611 Earned interest on Local Grants 1,784 Total TDA Funds Available $1,177,616 Street Lighting Fund 127,000 Street Lighting Fund Less YTD Expenditures - 4,616 Total Funds Available $1,300,000 Total Construction Cost - 967,230 332,770 Engineering, Inspection & Administration - 154,750 Contingency $ 178,020 See Engineer's Estimate and CIP 144 budget sheets. 10 k ti STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONTRACT FOR CIP 90-144, STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH Engineer's Estimate Bidder's Name ITEM NO. ITEM APPROX. QUANTITY UNIT OF MEASURE UNIT PRICE (IN FIGURES) TOTAL DOLLARS (IN FIGURES) 1 Saw cut existing pavement 5,100 L.F. $1.00 $5,100 2 Remove existing P.C.C. Pavement 102,000 S.F. $ .98 $99,960 3 Remove existing concrete block masonry wall 6,500 L.F. $3.50 $22,750 4 Construct 7.5" P.C.C. pavement 102,000 S.F $6.00 $612,000 5 Construct reinforced P.C.C. wall 6,500 L.F. $28.00 $182,000 6 Construct Handicap access ramps 3 EA. $1,200.00 $3,600 7 Install 2" conduit, pull boxes and pull conductors 5,000 L.F. $6.00 $30,000 8 Install striping 9,800 L.F. $.15 $1,470 GRAND TOTAL $956,880 City Forces Refurbish Electrolier Mast Arms City Forces Crack Seal Hermosa Avenue Bike Path Total Construction Cost $5,400 4,950 $967,230 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL -IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 92-93 THROUGH FY 96-97 PROGRAM AREA: PROJECT NUMBER & NAME: ACCOUNT NUMBER: Street and Safety Improvements CIP 90-144 Replace Strand Wall and Walkway 115-401-8144-4201 105-401-8144-4201 PROJECT LOCATION & DESCRIPTION: This project proposes to: (1) remove and replace the Strand walkway from the southern City Limit to 8th Street and from 15th Street to 24th Street; (2) remove and replace the Strand wall from the southern City Limit to 24th Street; (3) repair of existing bikepath from 24th Street to 35th Street; (4) extension of the bike path on Hermosa Avenue from 35th Street to connect with bike path in Manhattan Beach. Replacement of Strand walkway and wall from 24th Street to 35th Street is currently unfunded. PROJECT BACKGROUND & STATUS: The Los Angeles County Transportation Commission has provided funding in three installments for this project. Plans and Specifications are being prepared by City staff. SCHEDULED FISCAL YEAR START: FY 90-91 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: CIP/cipssim 4/16/92 FY 92-93 $1,305,585 209 • EXPENDITURES (PROJECT ELEMENTS ADMINISTRATION (1) PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS, SPECS 8 ESTIMATES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY TOTAL EXPENDITURE + FUNDING SOURCES 105 115 STREET LIGHTING FUND STATE GAS TAX FUND TDA Article 3, (SB 821) Regional Local TOTAL FUNDING TOTAL UNFUNDED CIP 90-144 EXPENDED PRIOR TO FY91-92 989 STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH EXPENDED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED BUDGET THRU EXPENDED BALANCE BUDGET FT91-92 2/28/92 6/30/92 6/30/92 FY92-93 FY93-94 5,000 15,000 700,000 50,000 3,075 0 1,925 15,000 700,000 50,000 0 989 770,000 75,011 5989 5845,011 0 989 + 13,502 25,000 11,248 1,035,000 90,000 15,000 0 3,075 766,925 1,189,750 75,011 115,835 SO 13,075 5841,936 11,305,585 0 845,011 0 3,075 0 841,936 0 5989 5845,011 127,000 1,160,323 18,262 SO 53,075 5841,936 11,305,585 (1) All administration costs are charged to Fund No. 115 as follows: POSITION Deputy City Engineer Asst. Engineer Engineering Tech. AUTHORIZED .10 .25* .10 4102 4180 4188 4189 s•ri:.`..20,;of,_Asst. Engineer time vacant 8 frozen for FY 92-93 due to budget constraints. + ESTIMATED FUTURE NEEDS ESTIMATED PROJECT FY94-95 FY95-96 FY96-97 1 TOTAL 0 0 0 13,502 29,064 11,248 1,035,000 90,000 15,000 0 1,193,814 115,835 50 SO SO SO 51,309,649 127,000 1,164,387 18,262 SO SO 50 50 51,309,649 REGULAR SALARIES RETIRMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS MEDICARE BENEFITS TOTAL: 511,159 1,466 715 162 S13,502 Project Salient Features: The essence of the project is to remove and replace the existing wall and pavement from Herondo to 8th Street, remove and replace the existing wall from 8th Street to 15th Street, remove and replace the existing wall and pavement from 15th Street to 24th Street and construct a pavement extension to connect to the bike path in Manhattan Beach. Additionally street lighting electrical conduit and electrolier mast arms will be replaced and refurbished respectively; asphalt crack sealing will be done on the bike path on Hermosa Avenue. Other features will be: Wall - 8" thick, 2' - 8" high (same as existing), cast -in-place, not block. Top treatment will be to slope to a center peak which prohibits walking, sitting or placing containers thereon. Pedestrian openings, same as existing. Color will be sand as approved by Council. Pavement - 7.5" thick. No reinforcement (same as existing). Doweled to existing sea wall. Score lines on centerline and at 10' centers transversely, making 10' squares. Score lines will be sawcut - not done with an edging tool, making for quieter skate -boarding. Color will be standard concrete grey color. Asphalt Bikeway on Hermosa Avenue - Since the existing asphalt is in near excellent condition, the very few longitudinal cracks will be sealed by city forces using the new high flexure life asphalt crack sealer. Electroliers - Remain in place, mast arms to be sand blasted and regalvanized or epoxy coated. Existing buried conduit and wiring to be replaced by contractor. Existing Trash Containers - To be replaced next to electroliers when work is complete. Existing Private Walls - Not affected, since existing concrete pavement stops at west face. 35th Street - Will extend Manhattan Beach Bike Path on straight alignment to connect the Hermosa Avenue Bike Path. Structural Considerations: Joint on West Side of Strand - The existing pavement is poured monolithic with the "Sea Wall" which descends westerly into the sand at a 45 degree angle well below the sand surface. This continuity will be saw -cut 6" east of the Strand wall for full depth. The new pavement will be doweled at 16" c -c to the old "Sea Wall" and the new strand wall will also be doweled at 16" c -c to the "Sea Wall". All steel for dowels as well as the steel within the wall will be epoxy coated to a thickness of 5 - 7 mils. Epoxy coated steel was used in repairs on the pier after the January 1988 storm. Concrete Pavement - Calculated and designed to carry a fire truck fully loaded with water (24,000 pound axle load). Wall - Calculated and designed for full height of sand load plus a 2 foot surcharge and 25% increase due to seismic load. Timing: Receipt of Bids 1/14/93 Award of Contract 1/26/93 Execute Contract 2/10/93 Start Construction 3/01/93 Complete Construction 5/15/93 May 29th is Fiesta Weekend. Last Minute Requests: On December 3 two citizens met with the City Manager and public Works Director with requests that additional features be considered in the design of the project. These features are: 1. Inset cross street names and 1/4 -mile markers into the face of new strand wall. 2. Provide in project for a pre -cast concrete wall alternative. 3. Place electroliers on the wall. 4. Place trash receptacles on pads west of the concrete wall. 5. Place non symmetrical slanted top on the wall to match the wall at Jarvis Memorial. If the Council wishes to approve these items they can be included, but advertisement would be delayed two weeks. Respectfully Submitted, arles McDonald Director of Public Works Viki Copeland Director of Finance ty/strand Frederick Ferrin City Manager 4 /.0.''/ s ��- December 9, 1992 To: City Council From: Ric errin Re: Readvertisement of the Downtown Maintenance Contract 1. In Part 4 of the Invitation for Bid (IFB) for the Downtown Maintenance Contract, it is prescribed that the contractor "shall pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages to employees at the job site, as provided in the State Labor Code, Sections 1774 and 1775. Said rates have been determined by the Director of Industrial Relations, State of California, a copy of said determination is on file at City Hall and is available to any interested party upon request." 2. Unfortunately, the Labor Code addresses maintenance work as it applies or is related to structural maintenance in the context of repair, renovation and reconstruction. Though we term this a "maintenance contract", we are really talking about custodial/janitorial work. Sections 1771, 1774 and 1775 are ambiguous in that they do not define, much less differentiate between maintenance as it applies to repair and renovation of a structure or facility and maintenance as it applies to custodial and janitorial functions. 3. The specification cited above does refer the potential bidder to the Director of Industrial Relations. The City did ask that office for an interpretation and learned that pursuant to the California Public Utilities Code Sections 465, 466, and 467, the prevailing wage for a janitor/cleaner was $4.25 per hour. This response still did not answer the whole question. Besides the City is not a public utility, and why was a public utility code used to determine the appropriate wage level? 4. Since this contract is being let by the City and administered by the Public Works Department, it would initially appear that the following language from Section 1771 of the State Labor Code would apply. "Except for public works projects of one thousand dollars ($1000) or less, not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work fixed as provided in this chapter, shall be paid to all workers employed on public works. This section is applicable only to work performed under contract, and is not applicable to work carried out by a public agency with its own forces. This section is applicable to contracts let for maintenance work." The prevailing rate of per diem wages is determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance 11 with the provisions of Section 1773 of the California Labor Code. What's confusing here is that the Director of Industrial Relations did give us a determination that the type or classification of work for which we were advertising was custodial/janitorial and had a straight -time wage rate of $4.25, but they cited the Public Utility Code as their reference, not Section 1773 of the California Labor Code. Nevertheless, I must assume that the Director of Industrial Relations knows how to determine the appropriate prevailing wage. In an effort to find out why the Director cited a public utility code, we went back to the Office of Industrial Relations and learned that the service contracts for which we had invited bids were "exempt" from the restrictions of Section 1771 in that this was a service contract(s) for work of a custodial/janitorial nature versus the structural/facility maintenance more typical to a public works or city engineering agency. Clearly, this represents sound reasoning and is, in my estimation, a valid determination. However, there is no language in the California Labor Code that would directly lead the City to this determination, and we had no alternative but to go to the Office of the Director of Industrial Relations. The question now boils down to whether or not the City's IFB was so confusing or nebulous that alleged confusion on the part of potential bidders over the level of prevailing wage would warrant our rewriting the purportedly confusing section of the IFB and readvertising the downtown maintenance contracts. It is also the opinion of the City Attorney that no mention of prevailing wage need be made in the IFB and the City is not required to mandate the employer's payment of prevailing wage to his employees. 5. Several of the 25 potential bidders claimed that they were confused by the requirement for the payment of prevailing wage. I contacted the four contractors who claimed confusion over the prevailing wage language as a contributory factor in their decision to withhold a bid. I am far from convinced that the prevailing wage rate language was the most critical item in their decision not to compete. Most custodial maintenance companies specialize in one specific custodial function - either sweeping, janitorial services or steam cleaning and power scrubbing. Our invitation for bid sought a contractor who is multifaceted and can provide all of those services. The multi -disciplined nature of this contract is what scared off most of the potential bidders. Several claimed other complications to include the level of insurance required, the time limitations, equipment markings and crew uniforms. Twenty-five potential bidders were notified by letter of the contract and invited to pick up the invitation for bid package or a portion thereof. Only eight potential bidders picked up the package for the downtown area, eleven were interested in the pier maintenance segment and eleven were interested in the downtown sidewalk portion. The interest level was far from overwhelming. As you know, two companies bid all three increments of the package and one additional company bid the pier. 6. The question still remains, do we readvertise this custodial contract. On one hand, we certainly can based upon the exemption we have from mandating the payment of prevailing wage. Will the removal of the prevailing wage language attract more bidders? The best answer I could give is, "Maybe, but not more than three." The decision to readvertise really comes down to a question of whether or not to do so would get the City a better deal. I can't answer that definitively, but I doubt it seriously. One of the potential bidders, Jere Costello - owner of California Street Maintenance, indicated that he had previously bid the contract several times and could never beat Specialty Maintenance. He told me that in his professional opinion we were getting a terrific deal from Specialty Maintenance, and no other company in the area could provide as good a service for as low a cost. I continued my investigation about the volume of interest we received and learned that this low level of interest in City custodial contracts is quite typical. I was also curious about why Specialty Maintenance's bid was so much lower than those of the other bidders. Clearly, economy of scale is a factor. They have a substantial operation and base of operations in Redondo and the crews that would maintain Hermosa Beach would be a satellite off of and supported by the base in Redondo. 7. In making your decision on readvertisement, you must consider the following; a. Can we eliminate the prevailing wage language .... yes. b. Will we get more bidders yes, maybe as many as three. c. Will the City get a better bid than it already has ... possible but not very likely. d. What will it cost to readvertise besides another two or three months without a contract, $1477.85 to pay for the readvertisement and selection process November 16, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 24, 1992 DOWNTOWN MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS - GENERAL BACKGROUND: At the City Council meeting of September 22, 1992 the Council asked staff to investigate the prevailing wage for a laborer on the Downtown Maintenance Contracts and to analyze the reasons for limited bids on the project. Minimum Wage: Contact has been made with the Department of Industrial Relations and it has been determined that the classification of Janitor/Cleaner has a basic straight -time hourly rate of $4.25 per hour. This is the minimum wage which should be paid to a Maintenance Laborer on this contract. The low -bid contractor plans.to pay $8.50 per hour. ANALYSIS OF BIDDERS: Bidders were selected from the Los Angeles County Blue Book of Building and Construction under the general heading of Sweeping and Maintenance as well as from the previous bidder's list. Notice was also published in the Easy Reader on 9/24/92 and 10/1/92. Only those having the most promise of bidding were selected and notices were mailed on September 29, 1992. See attachment. SUMMARY: Category of Response Number Bid on project 3 Too busy 2 Did not respond, after repeated phone calls 7 Too many complaints 1 Didn't like scope of work 4 Misunderstood minimum wage requirements 4 Insurance too costly 1 Didn't receive notice i Couldn't make deadline i Didn't have license 1 Total: 25 - 1 - 11a Though there was some limited confusion about the requirement for State Prevailing Wage, clarification was available either from the City or the State Department of Industrial Relations. Therefore, since only 4 out of 25 firms claimed confusion as their reason for not bidding, it is not really significant or grounds to regard the requirement for State Prevailing Wage as a bona fide impediment to the bidding process. Respecty submitted, i i / (Fi=eA/c_ Charles S. McDonald Director of Public Works Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Attachment: List of Contractors Sent Notices pworks/CCDNTNMT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOWNTOWN AREA MAINTENANCE CONTRACT CONTRACTORS SENT NOTICES NO. NAME AND ADDRESS PHONE BID DID NOT BID REASON FOR NOT BIDDING California Street Maintenance (310) Erroneously thought 1. 1918 W. 169th St Gardena, CA 90247 536-0162 * minimum wage applied to all classes of labor & decided he couldn't compete Coastal Cleaning (310) 2. 507 Earle Lane Redondo Beach, CA 90278 374-7064 * Bid pier maintenance only Davis Power Sweeping (310) Did not like the work 3. 923 E. Laurel Ave. Compton, CA 90221 638-5749 * combination in the contract DeJong Sweeping Service (310) 4. 16418 Chicago Avenue Bellflower, CA 920-7507 * Saw sweeper operator wage as too high E R C (310 5. 22827 Madrona 326-1535 * Could not contact Torrance, CA 90505 Fleet Sweep Maintenance Co. (213) 6. P.O. Box 4159 778-8018 * Could not be contacted Inglewood, CA 90309 Graffiti Blasters (310) Did not like the scope 7. 3216 Dalemead St. Suite A Torrance, CA 90505 534-3663 * and frequency of sidewalk scrubbing Harrison Hydro -Blast (310) 8. 2131 W. 240th St. _ Lomita, CA 90717 517-9616 * Could not contact estimator High Speed Enterprise (310) 9. 26640 Western Ave. Ste. M218 513-1932 * Could not be contacted Harbor City, CA 90710 Howell's Commercial (310) . 10. 11182 Lindblade St. Culver City, CA 90230 839-3669 * Could not contact estimator K -Sweeping Service (310) Many complaints about 11. 1200 Fisher Ave. Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 546-5044 * requirements in the contract Klear-Sweep Parking Lot Service (310) Erroneously felt that 12. P.O. Box 3395 Torrance, CA 90510 328-8150 * prevailing wages were too high C Mason Parking Lot Maint., Inc. (310) 13. 15819 S. San Pedro St. Gardena, CA 90248 323-1041 * Didn't like the combination of work CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOWNTOWN AREA MAINTENANCE CONTRACT CONTRACTORS SENT NOTICES NO. NAME AND ADDRESS PHONE BID DID NOT BID REASON FOR NOT BIDDING Mercury Sweeping Service (310) 14. 13822 S. Prairie Ave. Hawthorne, CA 90250 679-1451 * Never received a letter for bid Pacific Hydro Cleaners (310) 15. 3535 Maricopa #8 542-2386 * Could not contact Torrance, CA 90503 Parking Lot Sweeping & Gen. Maint (213) Saw sweeper operator 16. P.O. Box 47752 Los Angeles, CA 90042 754-2846 * minimum wage as too high Reddy Wash (310) 17. 1910 Firmona Avenue Redondo Beach, CA 90278 214-2466 * Could not make the deadline Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. (310) 18. 2663 Manhattan Beach Blvd. 536-0162 * Bid all three contracts Redondo Beach, CA 902'78 Steam X (310) 19. 5400 Canton St. 420-1996 * Did not have a license Long Beach, CA 90815 Superior Sweeping Co. (310) 20. 10429 Salinas River Circle Fountain Valley, CA 92708 326-8500 * Too busy reconditioning vehicles Sweep -O -Matic (310) 21. 148 South Ave., Suite 54 Los Angeles, CA 90042 258-8623 * Job too big - also all booked up Thorndyke Maintenance Inc. (213) 22. 9809 5th Avenue 755-8552 * Bid all three contracts Inglewood, CA 90305 Thompson Power Wash 23. * Would not respond to calls Toddco Sweeping Co. (310) Did not like the work 24. 1926 Del Amo Blvd., Ste A Torrance, CA 90501 783-0773 * combination in the contract Tucker & Son Sweeping Service (213) 25. P.O. Box 186 Lakewood, CA 90714 778-8018 * Insurance requirement too expensive pworks/connote �a-/s-9a- October 26, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 15, 1992 AWARD OF BID FOR MUNICIPAL PIER MAINTENANCE CONTRACT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: (a) Authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. for a 2 1/2 year period ending June 30, 1995, at a cost of $33,326.75. Background: The original time for this contract was scheduled to begin at the start of the winter season in 1992 and end at the finish of the summer season in 1995. This was revised by the City Council to. end the contract on June 30, 1995. On September 8, 1992, the City Council authorized staff to call for bids on the municipal pier contract. This is the third time that the bids for this work have been advertised. Telephone calls were made and notices were sent to 25 contractors. Ten bid packages were picked up. Three bids were submitted to the City by the following contractors. a. Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. of Redondo Beach. b. Thorndyke Maintenance, Inc. of Anaheim. c. Coastal Cleaning of Redondo Beach. Analysis: The analysis is divided into the following three divisions: 1. The Bid 2. Fiscal Impact 3. Summary 1 1 1 b 1. The Bid Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. is the low Bidder. The adjusted contract is for a period of 31 months which starts December 1, 1992 and ends June 30, 1995. The total contract cost is $33,326.75. Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. submitted their bid document without the required signature. The representative of the contractor was present at the bid opening and signed the bid document at that time. The City Attorney has indicated that we can waive this informality if it is in the best interest of the City. The second low bidder was Coastal Cleaning. Their total contract cost for the same 31 month period was $66,146, 198% of the low bid amount. The third low bidder was Thorndyke Maintenance, Inc.. Their total contract cost for the same 31 month period was $71,913.95, 216% of the low bid amount. 2. Fiscal Impact Items of Work 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year Totals Time Schedule 4 months of Winter 7 months of Summer 5 months of Winter 7 months of Summer 5 months of Winter 3 months of Summer 31 months Trash Barrel Pick -Up 3,003.00 3,276.00 2,293.20 $ 8,572.20 Rest Room Maintenance 4,790.00 5,200.00 3,567.75 13,557.75 Fishing Pier Maintenance 3,978.00 4,304.00 2,914.80 11,196.80 Total $11,771.00 $12,780.00 8,775.75 $33,.326.75 The funding for this contract is to be paid by the General Fund in the amounts as shown above. This funding will pay for the Municipal Pier Maintenance during a period of 31 months, starting December 1, 1992 and ending June 30, 1995. 3. Summary Specialty Maintenance Co. Inc., of Redondo Beach, is the lowest responsible bidder for contract. The staff recommends that this company be awarded the the contract for the Municipal Pier Maintenance. They have conducted the past contract maintenance - 2 - • work for the City of Hermosa Beach over the last seven years and they have done so in a satisfactory manner. The proposed contract as revised by the City Council was scheduled to run from November 1, 1992 through June 30, 1995. Since the awarding process has taken longer than expected due to technical problems in the received bids, the start date of the contract has been adjusted to December 1, 1992. Alternative: 1. Reject the bids and readvertise the contract. Attachments Attachment "A" - Map showing the location of the municipal pier areas to be maintained. Attachment "B" - Summary of bids. Respectfully submitted, K Homay(dun Behboodi Assistant Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact Viki Copeland Finance Director pworks/dcon923 Lynn Terry, Depu).y ity Epcy neer Charles McDo'pald Dire for of Public Works Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Hermosa Beach Pier O"=z TRASH BARRELS CI = CUTTING BOARDS D = -BENCHES. ATTACHMENT "A" SUMMARY OF BIDS FOR 31 MONTH PERIOD FOR MUNICIPAL PIER MAINTENANCE ITEMS OF WORK SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE INC. THORNDYKE MAINTENANCE INC. COAST CLEANING TRASH BARREL PICK-UP 8,572.20 22,766.76 -0- * RESTROOM MAINTENANCE 13,557.75 29,467.34 -0- * FISHING PIER MAINTENANCE 11,196.80 19,679.85 66,146.00* TOTAL $33,326.75 $71,913.95 $66,146.00 * CONTRACTOR DID NOT EXTEND QUANTITIES CORRECTLY. THE MONTHLY COST FOR EACH BID ITEM WAS NOT ITEMIZED AS THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN ON THE BID COST BREAKDOWN SHEET. THERE IS NO WAY TO CONSTRUE THAT HE MIGHT HAVE BEEN THE LOW BIDDER. "ATTACHMENT B" ty/pierbid COPY OF CONTRACT MUNICIPAL PIER MAINTENANCE This contract is made and entered into the 24th day of November , 1992 by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "City", and Specialty Maint. Co., Inc. hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor". RECITALS: (a) The City is desirous of contracting with the Contractor for performance by its appropriate officers and employees to perform certain required City functions. (b) The contractor is agreeable to performing such functions as stated in the terms and conditions set forth within the "General Provisions" and the "Special Provisions" of this contract. THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The contractor agrees, through its officers and employees, to perform those City functions which are hereinafter provided for. 2. The City shall pay for such functions as are provided under this contract at rates specified within the specifications. 3. No employee of the Contractor shall perform for said City any function not coming within the scope of the duties of such officer or department in performing said function for the City. 4. All persons employed in the performance of such functions for the City shall be employees of the Contractor, and no person employed hereunder shall have any City pension, civil service, or other status or right. For the purpose of performing such functions, and for the purpose of giving official status to the performance hereof, the Contractor engaged in performing any such function shall not be deemed to be an officer or employee of said City while performing for the City within the scope of this contract. 5. City shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salary, wages or other compensation to any personnel performing any function 'hereunder for the City, or any liability other than that provided for in this contract. Except as herein otherwise specified, City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnity to any contractor's employee for injury or sickness arising out of his employment. 6. The Contractor shall not be deemed to assume any liability for the negligence of the City, or of any officer or employee thereof, nor for any defective or dangerous - condition of the streets or property of the City, and the City shall hold the Contractor and his employees harmless from, and shall defend the Contractor and employees thereof against any claim for damages resulting therefrom. 7. The contractor will be paid for extra work performed, including salary, wages and other compensation for labor; - 2 - i supervision and planning plus overhead; reasonable rental value of all Contractor owned machinery or equipment, rental fee paid for all rented machinery or equipment, together with the cost of an operator thereof when furnished with said machinery or equipment, the cost of all machinery and supplies furnished with reasonable handling charges, and all additional items of expense incidental to the performance of such function. 8. The Contractor shall render to City at the close of each calendar month an itemized invoice which covers all functions performed during said month, and City will pay therefore within thirty (30) days after date of said invoice or soon thereafter. 9. This contract shall become effective on January 1, 1993 and shall run for a period ending June 30, 1995. At the option of the City Council and with the consent of the Contractor, the contract may be renewable for a period not to exceed three years. 10. The City may terminate this contract at any time, for whatever reason, by giving thirty (30) days prior written notice to the Contractor. 11. Contractor agrees to perform all functions under this agreement, as set forth in both the "General Provisions" and the "Special Provisions" of the Municipal Pier Maintenance Specifications dated 9/9/92, incorporated herein by reference and made a part thereof as though fully set forth. - 3 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed by their duly authorized officers. Executed this day of THE, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ATTEST: , 19 By By City Attorney pworks/Dcon92II Mayor CONTRACTOR: SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO., INC. Company Name By (Title) By (Title) //,p October 26, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 15, 1992 AWARD OF BID FOR CLEANING OF DOWNTOWN SIDEWALKS CONTRACT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: (a) Authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. for a 2 1/2 year period ending June 30, 1995, at a cost of $6,325.00. Background: The original time for this contract was scheduled to begin at the start of the winter season in 1992 and end at the finish of the summer season in 1995. This was revised by the City Council to end the contract on June 30, 1995. On September 8, 1992, the City Council authorized staff to call for bids on the cleaning of downtown sidewalks contract. Telephone calls were made and notices were sent to 25 contractors Ten bid packages were picked up. Two bids were submitted to the City by the following contractors. a. Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. of Redondo Beach. b. Thorndyke Maintenance, Inc. of Anaheim. Analysis: 1. The Bid 2. Fiscal Impact 3. Summary 4. Vehicle Parking District Consideration 1 1 1 c 2 1. The Bid Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. is the low Bidder. The contract is for a period of 31 months which starts December 1, 1992 and ends June 30, 1995. The total contract cost is $6,325.00. Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. submitted a bid document without the required signature. The representative of the contractor was present in the bid opening process and signed the bid document at the bid opening. The City Attorney has indicated that we can waive this informality if it is in the best interest of the City. The second low bidder was Thorndyke Maintenance. Their total contract cost for the same number of times was $9,887.97, 156% of the low bid amount. 2. Fiscal Impact Items of Work 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year Totals Time Schedule 3 Times in Winter 1 Time in Summer 3 Times in Winter 1 Time in Summer 3 times in Winter 11 Times Sidewalk Scrubbing 2,300.00 2,300.00 1,725.00 $ 6,325.00 The funding for this contract is to be paid by the V.P.D. Fund in the amounts as shown above. This funding will pay for the Downtown Maintenance from December 1, 1992 through June 30, 1995. 3. Summary Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. of Redondo Beach, is the lowest responsible bidder for contract. The staff recommends that this company be awarded the contract for the Downtown Area Maintenance. They have conducted the past contract maintenance work for the City of Hermosa Beach in a satisfactory manner over the last seven years. The revised contract was scheduled to run from November 1, 1992 through June 30, 1995. Since the awarding process has taken longer than expected due to technical questions in the received bids, the start date of the contract has been adjusted to December 1, 1992. 4. Vehicle Parking District Considerations The bids were reported to the Vehicle parking District Commissioners at their meeting of November 3, 1992. The commissioners did not act with respect to the bids, however, they wished to increase the frequency of sidewalk scrubbing to a monthly basis. Since sidewalks are scrubbed four times per year and steamcleaned after the May and September Fiestas, this would - 2 - require an additional six (6) scrubbings at the bid price of $575.00 per scrubbing equaling $3,450.00. This can be added onto the contract if the Council so directs. Alternatives: 1. Reject the bids and readvertize the contract. Attachments Attachment Attachment nAn ugu - Maps showing the location of the downtown area to be maintained. - Summary of Bids Respectfully submitted, Homay un Behboodi Assistant Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact Viki Copeland Finance Director pworks/dcon92V - 3 - Lynn Terry, Deputy y Engi / atles MdDonald Director of Public Works • Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager 41,-. CITY OF IHERMOSA BE7CI-I FIFTEENTH H ERNOSA FOURTEENTH CLEANING OF DOWNTOWN SIDEWALKS o o o o Frontages to be scrubbed. 0 0 0 & 0 0 0 THIRTEEN TN o 0 0 $ 0 0 0 0 0 o- 0 0 ti .7 ELEVENTH w ti • .. VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT NO. ATTACHMENT "A" SUMMARY OF BIDS FOR 31 MONTH PERIOD FOR CLEANING OF DOWNTOWN SIDEWALKS NAME OF CONTRACTOR SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE THORNDYKE MAINTENANCE ATTACHMENT "B" $6,325.00 $9,887.97 COPY OF CONTRACT DOWNTOWN AREA MAINTENANCE This contract is made and entered into the 24th day of November , 1992 by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "City", and Specialty Maint. Co., Inc. hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor". RECITALS: (a) The City is desirous of contracting with the Contractor for performance by its appropriate officers and employees to perform certain required City functions. (b) The contractor is agreeable to performing such functions as stated in the terms and conditions set forth within the "General Provisions" and the "Special Provisions" of this contract. THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The contractor agrees, through its officers and employees, to perform those City functions which are hereinafter. provided for. 2. The City shall pay for such functions as are provided under this contract at rates specified within the specifications. 3. No employee of the Contractor shall perform for said City any function not coming within the scope of the duties of such officer or department in performing said function for the City. 4. All persons employed in the performance of such functions for the City shall be employees of the Contractor, and no person employed hereunder shall have any City pension, civil service, or other status or right. For the purpose of performing such functions, and for the purpose of giving official status to the performance hereof, the Contractor engaged in performing any such function shall not be deemed to be an officer or employee of said City while performing for the City within the scope of this contract. 5. City shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salary, wages or other compensation to any personnel performing any function hereunder for the City, or any liability other than that provided for in this contract. Except as herein otherwise specified, City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnity to any contractor's employee for injury or sickness arising out of his employment. 6. The Contractor shall not be deemed to assume any liability for the negligence of the City, or of any officer or employee thereof, nor for any defective or dangerous condition of the streets or property of the City, and the City shall hold the Contractor and his employees harmless from, and shall defend the Contractor and employees thereof against any claim for damages resulting therefrom. 7. The contractor will be paid for extra work performed, including salary, wages and other compensation for labor; supervision and planning plus overhead; reasonable rental value of all Contractor owned machinery or equipment, rental fee paid for all rented machinery or equipment, together with the cost of an operator thereof when furnished with said machinery or equipment, the cost of all machinery and supplies furnished with reasonable handling charges, and all additional items of expense incidental to the performance of such function. 8. The Contractor shall render to City at the close of each calendar month an itemized invoice which covers all functions performed during said month, and City will pay therefore within thirty (30) days after date of said invoice or soon thereafter. 9. This contract shall become effective on January 1, 1993 and shall run for a period ending June 30, 1995. At the option of the City Council and with the consent of the Contractor, the contract may be renewable for a period not to exceed three years. 10. The City may terminate this contract at any time, for whatever reason, by giving thirty (30) days prior written notice to the Contractor. 11. Contractor agrees to perform all functions under this agreement, as set forth in both the "General Provisions" and the "Special Provisions" of the Cleaning of Downtown Sidewalks Specifications dated 9/9/92, incorporated herein by reference and made a part thereof as though fully set 3 forth. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed by their duly authorized officers. Executed this day of THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ATTEST: , 19 By By Mayor CONTRACTOR: SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO., INC. Company Name By (Title) City Attorney By (Title) pworks/Dcon92IV October 26, 1992 / Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 15, 1992 AWARD OF BID FOR DOWNTOWN AREA MAINTENANCE CONTRACT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: (a) Authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. for a 2 1/2 year period ending June 30, 1995, at a cost of $73,784.06. Background: The original time for this contract was scheduled to begin at the start of the winter season in 1992 and end at the finish of the summer season in 1995. This was revised by the City Council to end the contract on June 30, 1995. On September 8, 1992, the City Council authorized staff to call for bids on the downtown maintenance contract. This is the third time that the bids for this work have been advertised. Telephone calls were made and notices were sent to 25 contractors Nine bid packages were picked up. Two bids were submitted to the City by the following contractors. a. Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. of Redondo Beach. b. Thorndyke Maintenance, Inc. of Anaheim. Analysis: 1. The Bid 2. Fiscal Impact 3. Summary 4. Vehicle Parking District Considerations 1. The Bid Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. is the low Bidder. The contract is for a period of 31 months which starts December 1, 1992 and ends June 30, 1995. The total contract cost is $73,784.06 - 1 - 1 d Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. submitted a bid document without the required signature. The representative of the contractor was present in the bid opening and signed the bid document at the bid opening. The City Attorney has indicated that we can waive this informality if it is in the best interest of the City. Attachment "A" which accompanied the bid document is a letter from the contractor that offers additional clean-up, above and beyond the scope of work within the contract, at no charge to the City. This will be "folded" into the contract at no additional cost to the City. Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. made a typo error on item #1, "Power Sweeping", in the third year. The unit price for the 1st and 2nd year for this item is $1,220.20. The unit price for all items were increased in the third year by 5%, which is where the typing error occurred, $128.21 was inserted instead of $1281.21 in the column for Power Sweeping. This error reduced the Grand total for this bid by $5,765.00. The grand total of $70,111.76 should be adjusted, to the bid price of $73,784.06 (Based on 31 months). After this correction Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. still remains the lowest bidder for this project. The City Council may waive technical errors or discrepancies if doing so is deemed to best serve the interests of the City. The second low bidder was Thorndyke Maintenance Inc. Their total contract cost for the same 31 month period was $137,426.02, 186% of the low bid amount. 2. Fiscal Impact Items of Work 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year Totals Time Schedule 4 months of Winter 7 months of Summer 5 months of Winter 7 months of Summer 5 months of Winter 3 months of Summer 31 months Power Sweeping 15,641.20 16,861.40 11,248.23 $43,750.83 Hand Sweeping 2,883.00 3,126.00 2,135.70 8,144.70 Trash Barrel Pick -Up 2,560.00 2,780.00 1,911.00 7,251.00 Litter Pick -Up 3,201.00 3,455.25 2,317.55 8,973.80 Dumpster Area Clean -Up 1,229.75 1,325.00 881.98 3,436.73 Sand Removal 800.00 860.00 567.00 2,227.00 Total $26,314.95 $28,407.65 19,061.46 $73,784.06 The funding for this contract is to be paid by the V.P.D. Fund in the amount of $13,968.45 for FY 92-93, $28,407.65 for FY 93-94 and $31,407.96 for FY 94-95. This funding will pay for the Downtown Maintenance during a period of 31 months starting December 1, 1992 through June 30, 1995. 3. Summary Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. of Redondo, is the lowest responsible bidder for the contract. The staff recommends that this company be awarded the contract for the Downtown Area Maintenance. They have conducted the past contract maintenance work for the City of Hermosa Beach in a satisfactory manner over the last seven years. The revised contract was scheduled to run from November 1, 1992 through June 30, 1995. Since the awarding process has taken longer than expected due to technical problems in the received bids, the start date of the contract has been adjusted to December 1, 1992. 4. Vehicle Parking District Parking Considerations The bids were reported to the Vehicle Parking District Commissioners at their meeting of November 3, 1992. The commissioners did not act with respect to the bids; however, they addressed two items which they would like to change. a. A request was made to change the clean up at the dumpster area from Friday to Saturday. This change can easily be made with no change in contract cost. b. A request was made to add the hand sweeping on. Saturday during the Winter Schedule. It would appear that this increase could be negotiated with the contractor by simple proration if the Council so directs. Alternatives: 1. Reject the bids and readvertize the contract. Attachments Attachment "A" - Copy of a letter from Specialty Maintenance enclosed with the bid package that offered additional work at no cost to the City. Attachment "B" - Maps showing the location of the downtown area to be maintained. Attachment "C" - Summary of Bids. Respectfully submitted, �eh1' -• Homayo Behboodi Assistant Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact Viki Copeland Finance Director pworks/dmaward Lynn Terry, Deputy,City En•ineer C Charles McDonald Director of Public Works Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager October 15, 1992 Office of the City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Hermosa Beach, California 90254 To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed is the bid for MUNICIPAL PIER MAINTENANCE submitted by Specialty Maintenance. After reviewing the Scope of Services called out in this bid and given our past experience 'with this type of work for the City, Specialty Maintenance will perform additional work at no charge to the City as follows: Pier Middle: Restrooms: Pier Ave.: Pier Head: Increase from once a week to three times per week during winter months. Increase from one to two times per day on summer week -ends. Sweep from Palm to Valley Drive two times per week year round. Scrubbing, hosing, bench clearing an additional two times per week on Saturdays and Sundays year round. We appreciate the opportunity to bid on this project, again. Sincerely, Alana M. Handman , Vice-Presidenn -c Stephanie O'Raidy Secretary ATTACHMENT "A" SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO., INC. ■ 2663 Manhattan Beach Blvd. • Redondo Beach, CA 90278 • 310/536-9330 TREE/PLANTER WELLS 11 11 HERMOSA BEACH Vehicle Parking District i L= 4 7- N El[I111In7i = VPD #1 0 = MEDIAN = TRASH BARREL ATTACHMENT "B2" SUMMARY OF BIDS FOR 31 MONTHS PERIOD FOR DOWNTOWN AREA MAINTENANCE ITEMS OF WORK SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO., INC. THORNDYKE MAINTENANCE INC. POWER SWEEPING $43,750.83 $90,845.40 HAND SWEEPING $ 8,144.70 F $18,208.53 TRASH BARREL PICK-UP $ 7,251.00 $ 9,890.92 LITTER PICK-UP $ 8,973.80 $ 6,864.68 DUMPSTER AREA CLEAN-UP $ 3,436.73 $ 6,937.60 SAND REMOVAL $ 2,227.00 $ 4,819.92 TOTAL $73,784.06 $137,567.05 ATTACHMENT "C" COPY OF CONTRACT DOWNTOWN AREA MAINTENANCE This contract is made and entered into the 24th day of November , 1992 by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "City", and Specialty Maint. Co., Inc. hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor". RECITALS: (a) The City is desirous of contracting with the Contractor for performance by its appropriate officers and employees to perform certain required City functions. (b) The contractor is agreeable to performing such functions as stated in the terms and conditions set forth within the "General Provisions" and the "Special Provisions" of this contract. THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The contractor agrees, through its officers and employees, to perform those City functions which are hereinafter provided for. 2. The City shall pay for such functions as are provided under this contract at rates specified within the specifications. 3. No employee of the Contractor shall perform for said City any function not coming within the scope of the duties of such officer or department in performing said function for the City. 4. All persons employed in the performance of such functions for the City shall be employees of the Contractor, and no person employed hereunder shall have any City pension, civil service, or other status or right. For the purpose of performing such functions, and for the purpose of giving official status to the performance hereof, the Contractor engaged in performing any such function shall not be deemed to be an officer or employee of said City while performing for the City within the scope of this contract. 5. City shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salary, wages or other compensation to any personnel performing any function hereunder for the City, or any liability other than that provided for in this contract. Except as herein otherwise specified, City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnity to any contractor's employee for injury or sickness arising out of his employment. 6. The Contractor shall not be deemed to assume any liability for the negligence of the City, or of•any officer or employee thereof, nor for any defective or dangerous condition of the streets or property of the City, and the City shall hold the Contractor and his employees harmless from, and shall defend the Contractor and employees thereof against any claim for damages resulting therefrom. 7. The contractor will be paid for extra work performed, including salary, wages and other compensation for labor; - 2 - 4 supervision and planning plus overhead; reasonable rental value of all Contractor owned machinery or equipment, rental fee paid for all rented machinery or equipment, together with the cost of an operator thereof when furnished with said machinery or equipment, the cost of all machinery and supplies furnished with reasonable handling charges, and all additional items of expense incidental to the performance of such function. 8. The Contractor shall render to City at the close of each calendar month an itemized invoice which covers all functions performed during said month, and City will pay therefore within thirty (30) days after date of said invoice or soon thereafter. 9. This contract shall become effective on January 1, 1993 and shall run for a period ending June 30, 1995. At the option of the City Council and with the consent of the Contractor, the contract may be renewable for a period not to exceed three years. 10. The City may terminate this contract at any time, for whatever reason, by giving thirty (30) days prior written notice to the Contractor. 11. Contractor agrees to perform all functions under this agreement, as set forth in both the "General Provisions" and the "Special Provisions" of the Downtown Area Maintenance Specifications dated 9/9/92, incorporated herein by reference and made a part thereof as though fully set forth. - 3 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed by their duly authorized officers. Executed this ATTEST: day of THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH , 19 By By APPRO A,S LL TOFO Mayor CONTRACTOR: SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO., INC. Company Name By (Title) City Attorney By (Title) pworks/Dcon92II - 4 - ...� . r.:._ . 4141N.C..- _..: ... December 3, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 15, 1992 SUGGESTED DATES FROM VPD BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSION FOR JOINT MEETING BETWEEN COUNCIL AND BOARD Recommendation: Staff recommends that the suggested by the Board of joint meeting between the Background: City Council choose one of the dates Parking Place Commission, to hold a Council and Board. At their regularly scheduled meeting of November 10, 1992, the City Council asked the Board to pick some available dates to meet with them. The Board, at their regularly scheduled meeting of December 1, 1992, chose the following dates for consideration: January 6, Wednesday; January 7, Thursday; January 13, Wednesday; and January 14, Thursday. The Board regularly meets at 7:00 AM, on the first Tuesday of the month, but took no action to suggest a meeting time for this joint meeting. Analysis: The Board has several concerns, which may best addressed jointly with the City Council, and is therefore anxious to take advantage of this opportunity to meet with the Council. NOTED: Steve Wis iewski, Public Safety Director Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager 1 Respectfully submitted, Henry L. Staten, Coordinator General ery ' =- Department by P en y L. ~'a en, Coordinator Gen ral Services Department 13 a HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT !MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1992 i 1Nov 30, 1992 FIRE STATISTICS This Month This Month i rear to Date , Last Year One rear Aao To Date Total Calls -7.1 61 615 592 !types) False Alarms 7, 7 47 44 Mutual Aid 0 1 13 8 Paramedic assists 33 32 369 300 Residence Fire 4 4 49 32 Commercial Fire 2 1 21 27 Vehicle Fire 31 1 20 22 Hazardous Mtls. 7 4 47 41 Other 16 11 149 118 PARAMEDIC STATISTICS Total Responses 76 63 740 809 (types) No Patient/aid 9 5 59 69 Medical 27 37 306 332 Trauma 40 21 379 388 Auto Accident 15 13 121 159 Assault 10 5 76 78 Jail Call 6 3 45 46 Transports 40 441 376 379 Base Hosp. Con. 20 261 213 352 Trauma Center 0 0, 5 9 STRAND AND BEACH CALLS Medical only 11 0 21 15 Ocean Accident F 0 0 91 7 Beach Accident + 11 0 1 11 Bike v Bike 0 0 1 0 Bike v Ped 01 01 4 2 Fall off Bike 0 0 5 7 Skater v Skater + 0 0 0 0 Skater v Ped ! 0 0 0 7 Fall off Skates 0 0 6 11 Bike/Skater v Other 0 0 4 5 Assault 1 0 0 61 5 4 INSPECTIONS and PREVENTION j (primary) Commercial ; 86 71 691 760 Assembly i 0 1 1 6, Institutions i 0 3 4 10 Industrial 0 2 111 7 Apartments j 141 4 419 505 (re—inspections) Commercial 291 35 300 387 Assembly 1 0 2 6 6 Institutions i 1 1 10 5 Industrial 0 0 7 2 Apartments 381 43 413 444 Fumigations 1 5 16 124 131 Noted: Ress-c fully Sub, itt d: ..../ i.,..AA_,... Nkliar el P. _ I Frederick Ferrin, City Manager Steve S. Wisniewski. Di - or of Public Safety 1 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council December 8, 1992 ACTIVITY REPORT DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY NOVEMBER, 1992 Attached for your information are recap sheets of department activity for the month of November. Overall permit activity remained steady in November as the department is- sued 57 permits of which 26 were building permits. Two permits were issued for new detached condominium dwellings and ten permits were issued for al- terations or additions to existing dwellings. Eight permits were issued for alterations or additions to commercial buildings. One dwelling was de- molished so there was a net increase of one dwelling to the housing inventory. The department also processed forty-seven plans for zoning review, plan check or revisions. Plan processing "turn around" averaged ten days during November. The department conducted 139 inspections during November not in- cluding complaint investigations. Building Department general fund revenue for 41% of the fiscal year is $81,583.54 or 23% of projected revenue. Total revenue for all funds is $107,857.74. The Business License division reports that 135 licenses were issued during November resulting in revenue of $20,623.87. Business License revenue to date represents 31.4% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. The department logged 21 new code enforcement complaints during November, of which one was for an illegal dwelling unit. The department closed six cases in November and currently has seventeen illegal dwelling unit cases under investigation. The November recycling report was unavailable on the date of this report and will be included in next months activity report. Respectf lly Submitted,. a) William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety Noted: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager J CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT Month of NOVEMBER 1992 NUMBER OF THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY PERMITS CURRENT MONTH LAST FY DATE TO DATE Building 26 29 128 144 Plumbing 12 30 102 124 Electric 19 16 89 86 Plan Check 13 19 81 104 Sewer Use 0 0 0 7 Res. Bldg. Reports 21 -- -1.7 • a 89 - 82 Comm. Inspections 18 21 95 103 Parks & Recreation 0 0 0 2 In lieu Park & Rec. 1 0 1 7 Board �f Appeals 0 0 0 0 Sign Review 2 7 16 24 Fire Flow Fees 2 2 22 30 Legal Determination 0 .0 0 1 Zoning ' Appeals -, 0 0 .. ` 0 "0 TOTALS 114 141. 623 714 FES' "' ' ' ` Building** 6,414.05 _ 7,062.48 Plumbing 1,166.65 - , 2,572.65 Electric.___ ' ,'1,605.10 1,833.50 Plan Check 3,475.03 3,574.51 "Sewer Use 0 0 Res. Bldg. Reports 913.50 709.75 Comm. Inspections 782.50 .,..-876.75 Parks & Recreation 0 • 0 In lieu Park & Rec. 10,396.00 0 Board of Appeals 0 0 Sign Review 170.50586.25 Fire Flow Fees ' 2',141`.50 '-'337..25. Legal Determination 0 0 Zoning Appeals 0 0 35,679.97 .61,555.52 7,000.40 9,708.55 7,821.95 ' 7,900.10 21,952.47 46,137.39 0 . - 5,691.72 3,806.753,367.50 _3,973.00 .w; 4,215.75 0 7,000.00 10,396.00 .46,650.00 . Qr 0 1,349.00 1,968.75 15,878.20 26,782.58 0 - 1,046.00 0 0 TOTALS 27,064.83 17,553.14 107,857.74 222,023.86 VALUATIONS 522,315 280,715 .2,401,144 - 5,528,501 **Includes State Seismic Fee $ 55.90 Revenue: Licenses issued: BUSINESS LICENSE MONTHLY REPORT 20,623.87 26,433.95 135 137 161,839.03 200,359.42 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED Month of NOVEMBER 1992 TYPE OF STRUCTURE DWELLING UNITS PERMITS PROVIDED VALUATION 1. Single Dwellings 2. Duplex Dwellings 3. Triplex Dwellings 4. Four Units or More 5. Condominiums 2 2 391,000 6. Commercial Buildings 7. Industrial Buildings 8. Publicly Owned Buildings 9. Garages - Residential 10. Accessory Buildings 11. Fences and Walls 1 5,000 12. Swimming Pools 1 8,000 13. Alterations, additions or repairs to dwellings 10 51,615 14. Alterations, additions or repairs to Commercial Bldgs. 8 33,200 15. Alterations, additions or repairs to indus. bldgs. 16. Alterations, additions or repairs to publicly owned bldgs. 17. Alterations, additions, repairs to garages or accessory bldgs. 18. Signs 19. Dwelling units moved 20. Dwelling units demolished 1 21. All other permits not listed 2 Shoring 1 Tank Removal TOTAL PERMITS: 26 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: 522,315 ** TOTAL DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED : 2 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DEMOLISHED: 1 NET CHANGE: +1 NET DWELLING UNIT CHANGE FY 92/93 0 CUMULATIVE DWELLING UNIT TOTAL: 9698 (INCLUDES PERMITS ISSUED) ** Revised figure based on land use study by the Planning Dept. HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT f MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1992 November OFFENSES REPORTED This Month This Month Year to Date Last Year One Year Ago To Date Murder 0 0 0 0 Rape 1 0 7 2 Robbery 3 1 33 32 Assault 2 3 98 121 Burglary (Total) 30 26 437 294 Burglaries (Vehicle) 8 * 196 * Burglaries (Residential) 17 * 194 ' Burglaries (Commercial 5 * 47 Larceny 36 55 503 622 Motor Vehicle Theft 10 10 165 157 DUI 20 29 260 340 All Other Offenses 275 355 3654 3581 Disturbance Calls 194 201 3277 3045 *-Not separated prior to 1-92 PERSONS ARRESTED Adults 95 85 _ 1014 1124 Juveniles 7 , 6 83 74 Criminal. Citations 70 102 1054 930 Bicycle/Skateboard Cites 0 5 40 65 TRAFFIC REPORT ACCIDENTS Fatal 0 0 1 0 Injury 11 8 118 102 Property Damage Only 35 37 365 243 CITATIONS Traffic 277 506 3293 5724 Parking 10 4 175 191 CALLS FOR SERVICE Total Calls 2032 2560 25195 31691 *" indicates information unavailable Noted: Re •e Ily Submi -d ok �`A,-.A--) _�//tom':► Rick Ferrin, City Manager Steve Wisniewsk* Director of Public Safety December 3, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council November 24, 1992 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES NOVEMBER, 1992 ACTIVITY REPORT The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of November: RECREATION PROGRAMMING Special Events: Sand Bowl Classic II: What will now be considered a community tradition, the flag football tournament drew over 100 participants. The City conducts this event with the assistance of the UCLA Intramural Department who provide the equipment and officials necessary to run the tournament. The event was held on the beach at 10th Street on November 8. Victory sweatshirts were awarded to the Champions. Clean the Green: On the same weekend, the Hermosa Beach Police Department in cooperation with the Community Resources Department led a clean-up effort for the Greenbelt. DARE prizes were awarded to all of the youngsters who participated as well as some adults who logged the best or most unusual trash finds. Greenbelt clean-up events are slated for more frequency in the future. It is hoped that the Police Department will work with us again as their participation was key to the success of this effort. Kudos go to Commander Altfeld for leading the way. Senior Citizen Excursion: City staff and a busload of seniors visited Palm Springs on November 19 for the Historical Plaza's presentation of "Palm Springs Follies." Lunch and continental breakfast were part of the package. The seniors gave the show a thumbs -up! The bus fees were paid for with Prop A funds. Youth Chess Tournament: On November 28, the City Council Chambers were transformed into an arena for the finest in local youth chess. Participants (37) from Kindergarten through High-school competed in several age divisions for the Hermosa Beach plaques. Recreation programs/classes: The Spring offerings are being put together for the next brochure slated for, distribution in late January. New efforts will include: horseback riding class, theatre excursions (to LA), Dodger Game (fireworks night) and more! CIVIC THEATRE/FOUNDATION 10th Annual Theatre Gala: is scheduled for January 29, 1993 and will feature opening night of the Hermosa Civic Theatre's presentation of "Prelude to a Kiss" in combination with an exciting post theatre party. This recession priced event will cost $20 per person. MISCELLANEOUS Special projects: Staff continues to be involved with R/UDAT; municipal pier renovation; south school park master plan; beaches and harbors negotiations; oil lease and ADA compliance committees. Veterans Memorial: Planning committee is in full gear and details of the concept for the memorial will be released in the near future. Filming: Total revenue collected for filming in November was $11,085. Facility 11/92 User Hours 11/91 User Hours Field 152 150 Theatre 107 99 Clark 191 200 Gym 184 194 Room 8 119 116 Room 10 156 98 Room 12 70 112 DEPARTMENT REVENUE Current This month FY Last FY Month Last FY To Date To Date $23,741 $18,043 $160,995 $142,161 Revenue Projection: $364,000 Community Resources Department general fund revenue for 42% of the fiscal year is $160,995 or 44% of the projected figure. Community Resources Department general fund expenditure for 42% of the fiscal year is $140,087 or 36% (as of 11-25) of the budget FY 1991-92. - Respectfully submitted, Mary, Director C. m • Resources Dept. Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager December 8, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 15, 1992 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - NOVEMBER 1992 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration function coordinates and divisions of the Public Works Department in the City Council and City Manager; includes capital improvement projects. Permits Issued: Type Current Month Last FY To Date blends the efforts of all accomplishing the directives of engineering and management of This Month FY Last FY To Date Sewer Demolition Sewer Lateral Street Excavation Utility Co's only Dumpster/Strand Banner Permits 1 0 2 0 3 8 49 1 0 2 1 2 ENGINEERING 4 6 5 2 26 28 49 32 10 17 6 8 The Capital Improvement Projects which are currently in progress are: CIP 89-144 CIP 90-151 CIP 92-152 CIP 91-165 CIP 88-201 Strand Wall & Walkway Traf. Eng. Program Aviation/Ocean Traf. Safety Misc Bikeway Const. Light Conversions & New Installations CIP 92-506 CIP 89-513 CIP 92-520 CIP 91-701 MAINTENANCE The maintenance function of the Public following sections: - Parks/Medians - Street Maintenance/Sanitation - Sewers/Storm Drains - Street Lighting Works Various Park & Rec. Facility Improvements Development of 5 Lots Edith Rodaway Friendship Park Improvements at Clark Field City Parking Lot Improvements Department is divided into the - Traffic Safety - Building Maintenance - Equipment Service Parks Division/Medians: Median maintenance City-wide. Irrigation repair City-wide. Tree trimming City-wide. Street Maintenance/Sanitation: Installed new meter poles on Manhattan Avenue from 14th Street to Pier Avenue and on Hermosa Avenue north of Pier Avenue. Erected and removed barricades for voter parking. Blacktop street maintenance City-wide. Built new barricades at Beach Drive at 6th Street and on 14th Street just east of PCH. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Opened storm drain outlets on Beach. Built new steel electrical covers at 2nd and 22nd Street restrooms o the Beach. Street Lighting: Hung Christmas decorations City-wide. Assisted traffic safety crew grind and remove parking stalls in lots, #4, 7, 8 and 9. Traffic Safety Division: Continued replacement of Area Two regulatory signs as needed. Hung Christmas decorations on Hermosa Avenue and Pier Avenue. Striped and painted curb in parking lots #4, 7, 8, and 9. Re -striped parking stalls at the Kiwanis Club. Building Maintenance Division: Continued painting the outside of the Community Center. Installed new maple flooring in Community Center gym. Removed graffiti from the restrooms and repaired vandalism damage done to the snack bar at the end of the Pier. Equipment Service: On-going maintenance of City vehicles and equipment. Graffiti Removal: FY 91-92 FY 92-93 JULY 1991 AUGUST 1991 SEPTEMBER 1991 OCTOBER 1991 NOVEMBER 1991 DECEMBER 1991 JANUARY 1992 FEBRUARY 1992 MARCH 1992 APRIL 1992 MAY 1992 JUNE 1992 YTD TOTAL 59.50 27.00 43.50 37.50 24.00 27.00 19.50 14.50 34.00 12.00 49.00 29.00 Hrs. Hrs.(Revised) Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. 376.50 Hrs. Resl,lybmittedt S.Donald Director of public Works mon2/pwadmin JULY 1992 AUGUST 1992 SEPTEMBER 1992 OCTOBER 1992 NOVEMBER 1992 YTD TOTAL Not d: 33.50 28.50 39.50 11.00 37.00 Hrs.(Revised) Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. 149.50 Mrs Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT NOVEMBER 1992 ACTIVITY REPORT Parking Cites Issued Vehicles Impounded/Booted Calls Responded To Booting Revenue Dismissals processed Citations Issued Warnings Issued Complaints Responded To Total Number of Animals Picked -Up of which: Returned to Owner Taken to Shelter Injured, taken to Vet Deceased NOTED: Steve S. Wisniewski, Director of Public Safety Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager PARKING ENFORCEMENT Current Month 4,178 37 55 $8,149 519 33 0 32 38 This Month Last Year 4,683 18 83 $3,692 535 ANIMAL CONTROL 22 0 35 35 December 8, 1992 City Council Meeting of December 15, 1992 Last Fiscal Year Fiscal Year To Date To Date 27,529 30,449 198 474 $45,383 2,767 133 0 296 273 56 202 (10) (79) Respectfully submitted, by 152 571 $36,545 2,871 196 0 319 295 105 97 (26) (84) L. Swat en, General Services Coordinator COMMENTS: Positive enforcement of the Public Information Program, and (1) deleted part-time position, has contributed to the reduced citation count. Dismissals processed, are those citations dis- missed during the month of November, which includes citations issued during other months. 1 0 1 N/A 1 8 I N/A I HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT NOVEMBER 1992 STAFF REPORTS PREPARED December 8, 1992 Regular Meeting of December 15, 1992 !MEETINGS MEETINGS / SEMINARS I 33 I 34 170 - 1 54 CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES INITIAL INSPECTIONS THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE APPEAL / CITY COUNCIL RECONSIDERATION 1 0 3 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CONDO) 0 0 1 15 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (COMMERCIAL) 5 2 10 11 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 1 2 6 6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION/REVOCATION 0 0 0 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/ MAP EXTENSION 0 1 5 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 0 2 0 FINAL MAP 0 1 0 9 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 1 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 0 0 0 NONCONFORMING REMODEL 0 0 6 5 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 0 2 2 2 PARKING PLAN 1 1 2 1 SPECIAL STUDY 3 1 13 3 SUBDIVISION 0 0 10 1 TEXT AMENDMENT 1 0 11 2 TRANSIT 0 0 1 3 VARIANCE 0 1 1 1 ZONE CHANGE 0 1 0 1 MISCELLANEOUS 4 8 23 33 !MEETINGS MEETINGS / SEMINARS I 33 I 34 170 - 1 54 CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES INITIAL INSPECTIONS 10 12 52 52 FOLLOW UP INSPECTIONS 11 7 65 56 LETTERS GENERATED 4 8 1 1 1 106 MEMOS GENERATED 1 3 7 17 C.U.P. ACCEPTANCE FORMS RECEIVED 3 4 26 13 C.U.P. COVENANT FORMS GENERATED 3 4 31 27 C.U.P. COVENANT FORMS RECEIVED 3 4 19 24 CITATIONS ISSUED 0 0 1 0 C.U.P. VIOLATIONS ABATED 6 11 50 63 COMPLIANCE CHECK 3 N/ A 40 N/ A OTHER DEPARTMENTS REQUESTS OTHER DEPARTMENTS REQUESTS WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP MUNICIPAL AREA EXPRESS (MAX) RIDERSHIP BEACH ROUTE 1 1506 1 1139 7365 _ 7624 The Following Activities Were Undertaken for Transit Projects 1. Routine tasks. Upcoming Agenda Items to City Council 1. Special study regarding driveway grades.. Long Term Projects Underway 1. Recovering permit authority from Coastal Commission. 2. Updating zoning ordinance for compliance with current law, clarification of intent, and procedural correctness. 3. Continue work on oil drilling project. 4. Updating Land Use Element and other General Plan Elements. Michael Schubach Planning Director NO LLe L Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Respectfully submitted, w— f� YYing Ting Administrative Aide THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE HERMOSABEACHPASSENGERS 894 1224 5734 10551 REDONDO BEACH PASSENGERS 4054 3936 26379 26253 SATELLITE PASSENGERS 432 498 2161 2314 MUNICIPAL AREA EXPRESS (MAX) RIDERSHIP BEACH ROUTE 1 1506 1 1139 7365 _ 7624 The Following Activities Were Undertaken for Transit Projects 1. Routine tasks. Upcoming Agenda Items to City Council 1. Special study regarding driveway grades.. Long Term Projects Underway 1. Recovering permit authority from Coastal Commission. 2. Updating zoning ordinance for compliance with current law, clarification of intent, and procedural correctness. 3. Continue work on oil drilling project. 4. Updating Land Use Element and other General Plan Elements. Michael Schubach Planning Director NO LLe L Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Respectfully submitted, w— f� YYing Ting Administrative Aide December 3, 1992 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council December 15, 1992 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT NOVEMBER ACTIVITY REPORT Concluded recruitment for Recreation Specialist position. Current This Month FY to Last FY to STATISTICAL SECTION: Month Last Year Date to Date Worker Comp Claims: Claims Opened 8 2 26 26 Claims Closed 12 6 28 31 Total Open 59 75 N/A N/A Lost Time (Manhours) Safety 350 396 1,306 1,808 Non -safety 331 314 1,667 2.280 Liability Claims: Claims opened 2 2 7 30 Claims closed 1 9 19 26 Total open 31 42 N/A N/A Employee Involved Vehicle Accidents: Safety Non -safety Employee Turnover: 2 1 3 3 0 1 1 3 Safety 0 0 0 1 Non -safety 0 0 1 7 - 1 - General Appropriations Secretary: The following summary indicates the amount of the assigned functions: NOVEMBER: 160 hours available Word Processing Mail Processing 81% (129 hrs) 5% ( 9 hrs) Avg. 8 hrs/day Avg. .6 hr/day Word Processing Services by Department: of time spent on each Directory/Dept Support 14% (22 hrs) Avg. 1.4 hrs/day Finance : 24% (33 hrs) Public Works . City Manager:.07% ( 9 hrs) Personnel .• Planning :.03% ( 2 hrs) Community Resources: Respectfully Submitted, grhe 4,17) C -- Robert A. Blackwood, Director Personnel and Risk Management pers/act Noted: 27% 11% 28% Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager (35 (14 (36 hrs) hrs) hrs)