The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02/09/93air 99 �o/V "One of the best things people can have up their sleeves is a funny bone." -Richard L. Weaver II AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 9, 1993 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 7:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR Albert Wiemans MAYOR PRO TEM Sam Y. Edgerton COUNCILMEMBERS Robert Benz Robert Essertier Kathleen Midstokke CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Frederick R. Ferrin CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart- ment, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting a packet also is available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER: Barbara Conklin, Administrative Aide, Public Works Department PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the - 1 - Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel.3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or oral- ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet com- pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be- gin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. Note: City officesare open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the. Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has•the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items .. A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni- ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or- dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi- nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. (a) Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on January 14, 1993; 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on January 26, 1993. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Recommendation to receive and file the December, 1992 City Treasurer's report. Recommendation to receive and file the January, 1993 monthly investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated February 2, 1993. (f). Recommend tion to adopt a Land Use Analysis Program resolution in accordance with the Los Angeles County 1992 Congestion Management Program. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 26, 1993. (g) Recommendation to approve Notice to Invite Bids for Public Noticing for the City of Hermosa Beach. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 1, 1993. (h) Recommendation to approve an increase in the annual lease rates for fiscal years 1993-94, 1994-95, and 1995- 96 for Community Center rooms. Memorandum from Communi- ty Resources Director Mary Rooney dated February 1, 1993. (i) Recommendation to approve request from the Association of Volleyball Professionals to hold the 2 -man Pro Beach Volleyball Tournament on August 27, 28 and 29, 1993 with a daily perm t fee f $3,254 and to authorize the Mayor to sign the(contract. Memorandum from Community Resour- ces Director Mary Ro ney dated January 27, 1993. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION OF INTEN TO AMEND TH CITY'S CONTRACT WITH PERS TO PROVIDE SECTIOI( 20930.3 (MILITARY SERVICE CREDIT AS PUBLIC SERVICE) FOR LOCAL POLICE MEMBERS. Memorandum from Personnel Director Rob- ert Blackwood dated February 1, 1993. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO(INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT WITH THEPUBLI EMPLOYEES' RE- TIREMENT SYSTEM AUTHORIZING MILITARY SERVICE CREDIT AS PUBLIC SERVICE FOR LOCAL POLICE MEMBERS. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 1, 1993. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Carol Hunt, Executive Director, Chamber of Commerce, regarding annual meeting of South Bay Associa- tion of Chambers of Commerce to be held Friday, February 26. Recommended Action: Appoint Mayor or Mayor Pro Tem to attend. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. VEHICLE PARKING ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG BEACH DRIVE. Memorandum from Councilmember Sub -Committee Wie- mans and Edgerton. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. AWARD OF BID FOR THE STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated February 2, 1993. 7. STATUS REPORT ON PARKING LOT RECONFIGURATION, VICINITY OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BETWEEN 2ND AND 3RD STREETS. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated February 3, 1993. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) City Council Committee Assignments. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated January 27, 1993. 10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT • E AD: 0-.09 '693 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosli Beach, California, held on February 09, 1993, at the hour of 7: 3 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - The closed session was held at 7: P.M. regard- ing matters of litigation, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a): Turek vs. City of Hermosa Beach; and matters of Per- sonnel: meet and confer. The closed session was recessed at 7: P.M. to the regular scheduled public meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - )the0( ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Midstokke Mayor Wiemans Absent: None EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER: Barbara Conklin, Administrative Aide, Public Works Department Mayor Wiemans introduced Personnel Director Robert Blackwood who presented a plaque to Barbara Conklin as the "Employee of the Quarter" for the fourth quarter of 1992, and stated that Barbara Conklin was being recognized for her commendable management and coordination of the "work trustee program", the court referral program for those people obligated to do community service. An employee since 1990, Ms. Conklin's professionalism, dedication and organizational skills are highly valued by the Public Works Department. ru-r cc(D PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". :i A i 7.-_, Coming forw -• to address the Council at this time were: w4,z, City Council Minutes 02-09-93 Page 1 �� J CS -ex • 02/ 2-( Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, 4 June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, Dave Reimer - 802 3}7erry Compton - "—C(...-"° Shirley Cassell - Mont- Artesia Blvd., 6-, . �. -z5' 611 Monterey B d., ,A) (K/e-.2)) ._,..� /5 6"' 4, Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, Janet McHugh - 718 First Place, 7� Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, Edie Webber - 1210 Eleventh Street, Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, Martin Moreno - 1326 Corona Street, Marc Freeman - 1937 Palm Drive, L. x;°-5 CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) +� Public comments on the Consent Calendar. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (i), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: (a) , (b) , (c) (g) , (h) , and (i) . Motion, second et . So ordered. Coming forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar was: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, , (d) , (e) , (f) City Council Minutes 02-09-93 Page 2 • No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) (b) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on January 14, 1993; 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on January 26, 1993. Action: To approve the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of January 14, 1993 as and the minutes of the regular meeting of January 26, 1993 as Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. 42931 and 43030 through 43139 inclusive, noting voided warrants nos. 43033, 43034, 43035, 43053, 43068, 43113, 43114, and 43115. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the December, 1992 City Treasurer's report. Action: To receive and file the December, 1992 City Treasurer's report as presented. City Council Minutes 02-09-93 Page 3 �1 (e) (f) (g) Recommendation to receive and file the January, 1993 monthly investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated February 2, 1993. Action: To receive and file the January, 1993, monthly investment report as presented. Recommendation to adopt a Land Use Analysis Program resolution in accordance with the Los Angeles County 1992 Congestion Management Program. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 26, 1993. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-5590, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A LAND USE ANALYSIS PROGRAM THAT INCORPORATES A TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS INTO THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURES IN CONFOR- MANCE WITH THE 1992 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY." Recommendation to approve Notice to Invite Bids for Public Noticing for the City of Hermosa Beach. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated rFebruary 1, 1993. �� XAction: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the notice to invite bids and the bid submittal forms for public noticing. vt) Action: To not invite bids; contract with "Data -Quick" for monthly updates to the property rolls; and, to do the public noticing in-house. City Council Minutes 02-09-93 Page 4 (h) Recommendation to approve an increase in the annual lease rates for fiscal years 1993-94, 1994-95, and 1995- 96 for Community Center rooms. Memorandum from Communi- ty Resources Director Mary Rooney dated February 1, 1993. Action: To approve the Parks, Resources Advisory Commission to approve rates of: 1) July 1, 1993 through June 2) July 1, 1994 through June 3) July 1, 1995 through June Recreation and Community and staff recommendation 30, 1994 30, 1995 30, 1996 - $.87 sq. ft. - $.90 sq. ft. - $.93 sq. ft. for lease rates for Community Center rooms. Recommendation to approve request from the Association of Volleyball Professionals to hold the 2 -man Pro Beach ,{ Volleyball Tournament on August 27, 28 and 29, 1993 with Nl) a daily permit fee of $3,254 and to authorize the Mayor Or' to sign the contract'. Memorandum from Community Resour- � 0 j�'ces Director Mary Rooney dated January 27, 1993. .,)/c5r /fidhltfr'''' Coming This item cilmember meeting. was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- Midstokke for separate discussion later in the Community Resources Director Rooney presented the report and responded to Council questions. forward to address the Council on this item were: /,),Z4-/A)A-t74 ),7,g /l /"7 � /,�. }at-<n=t-Pgae-�,� e/.0( 1X/tit��,� //Th- Page 5 City Council Minutes 02-09-93 g staff vie • Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to: 1) approve the request from the Association of Volley- ball Professionals (AVP) to hold a 2 -man Pro Beach Volleyball Tournament on the Hermosa Beach Pier courts on August 27, 28, and 29, 1993 with a daily permit fee of $3,254 (total anticipated revenues of $23,770); 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the attached contract that provides the requirements and terms of the agreement between the City and the AVP; and, 3) deny the request from the AVP to charge admission for some of the seats at the tournament. Action: To 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (a) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO AMEND THE CITY'S CONTRACT WITH PERS TO PROVIDE SECTION 20930.3 (MILITARY SERVICE CREDIT AS PUBLIC SERVICE) FOR LOCAL POLICE MEMBERS. Memorandum from Personnel Director Rob- ert Blackwood dated February 1, 1993. Personnel Director Blackwood presented a staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-559/, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO CON- TRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH." Motion E.', second J . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of City Council Minutes 02-09-93 Page 6 • (b) RECOMMENDATION TO INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT WITH THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AUTHORIZING MILITARY SERVICE CREDIT AS PUBLIC SERVICE FOR LOCAL POLICE MEMBERS. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 1, 1993. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 93-1083. Motion V, , second '( . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 93-10836. entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM." Motion , second ��C... AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Wiemans NOES: 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), and (i) were heard at this time, but are shown in order for clarity * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate items. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Carol Hunt, Executive Director, Chamber of Commerce, regarding annual meeting of South Bay Associa- tion of Chambers of Commerce to be held Friday, February City Council Minutes 02-09-93 Page 7 26. Recommended Action: Appoint Mayor or Mayor Pro Tem to attend. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Carol Hunt - Ex. Dir., Chamber of Commerce, Action: To appoint as the Council representative to attend the annual meeting of South Bay Association of Chambers of Commerce on Friday, February 26, 1993. )/b PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. S. VEHICLE PARKING ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG BEACH DRIVE. Memorandum from Councilmember Sub -Committee Wie- mans and Edgerton. Supplemental information from Coun- cilmember Midstokke submitted February 9, 1992. Councilmember dverto. and Mayor Wieu. s presented the sub -committee eport and responded to Council questions. 2,2aring opened at 8:/.5P.M. Coming forward to address // 1 the Council on this item were:,C-t7/17. 9-e;e6gZ > /9e,„ 7) -Qo - 6/746' 2 64' iee ( /1< ��- Cit `Co`uncil i es` `02-09-93 Page 8 2/3-.2/ -'/?4'" 42-( �l 7'd'9 L err /6,c,,,,i) /d/,› 717 H A 2- (•)1 e �a h-Fri='=o:�A - ? 07 - /D \ ( L / 956 - . 0\ ,, , _ '7/92 2-3'll-1 `---P-f )-- ‘_,,,,e—r,<-2 944 -,Li-) /1)-z-e-et-eg-7-c--,-) Oie-,, 1-0-._ Li , .---__) 7 _7, ,____e ‘0,-7_) ___--------. N / .,-i /' c -v Ca A ),-c // yA/x • /9 6, ° 4 /� ----. .----a-- e. 9 . \ o-? ,,-"—< 6 / 93 / __ �---, �— te__...--,_z , y �� ,, -t �1 �.....,.._v,- 7 x _� �.�. 7"--- e) 1.,...) L—a--r ---,--- ) 1 r --Q,-1 )_.-z --e-' ...).----- 4, \ , 1/411 r v t d l'-/'... . / 9d J \ -_ --� _ 21a v "� Th public hear ni g closed at 2:- P.M � � � ��' J �avA/ `T /oiz 6e---_. ,,- )---t /._-_____,,,_), .7.7 )---e- ,___v i v'''-' 4 ____.( -- /'t D) Lv-Y.Lb 144_,,, ,-_,,7 -v ✓) 0. 6 %% IL%6- ( )iikot"..pk-- v- 42('10-44-0-)---, A_ ._.. e 66.„„ ._ ,.3_, /ti5). ,,,, .,),.( „?...,_, ,_____.) 2 e - " 1 - - :-:___,______ � Pr posed Aeion: IL ®► 7 �L -27 --- ", _._ - 0( t‹,--- ".- -7) ,_,,- 017, — L_) ( /6)_„:- ,a,/,,e-e_:;, , G,/-, ,'--S ,..--2 ,,---... —,--, , __---„ ,...._ .7 . ( ( ,__0) / --7 C .. ev , „2,--,5- -yt--e-,:- ---- ,-2-c )1 )21L- e --t ,,(1) 6,,, , Action: To ,„,ti,�, ��f" /.6 > , € a ___ . -- - 7 -.`-- - - - -7_ _ _ _ _ , y , - - t . Ad A...e.,/,„ ,52 0 ›,041_,,,--,"-,44 —v 4,.. (0, 7 ‘-'—v ) — —a • C CJ _ ) Z �� I- air - �� — 6yC) ity Council Minutes 02-09-93 Page 9 /4 /� 'r 6; , ,i' :/ -- •-.—e-,..� 0 - ." r. 4, , �,,,.2 6, • _ , e>, 20-2-74 61:,Ant //, J 6s.))v WV= 7 re 0( 6 sc.eK-?-1/) /('Ai 4, 49 v‘,2 f ,„( „,77 iee' ?-70 r eez_ so (7_Z.)/ c 1/(C. 1/4>**3, • MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. AWARD OF BID FOR THE STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated February 2, 1993. Supplemental letters from B.J. Mitchell, P.O. Box 865, Hermosa Beach, dated January 29, 1993, and, Patricia A. Egerer, 1142 Manhattan Avenue, /282, Manhattan Beach, dated February 1, 1993. Sup- plemental memorandum from City Attorney Vose, dated February 9, 1993. Public Works Director McDonald presented the staff re- port and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to addre s the Coun9il on this item were: ( /, /97/ /f C J-(A-ar 60zE .� j;` -;041e 91,E Action: To approve the staff recommendations to au- thorize the Mayor to sign a contract with "EMMA CORPORA- TION", 11545 West Olympic Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90064 for CIP 90-144: Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Path con- / sisting of: (.7--2 1) reconstruction of Strand pavement; 2) reconstruction of Strand wall with a poured -in- place wall with slightly rounded top; 3) electroliers and trash receptacles to be wall - mounted; and, 4) street names to be recessed into wall, for a total cost of $659,100. )kle-1J-t om/ y? /764-)74 q„, (2, -v }' City Council Minutes 02-09-93 Page 10 /tZvQ7- 1-9 .))? tA-0 -N '71 r (')/ --r „de.4.1 der gerd /-6 /-1/•"" Action: 7. STATUS REPORT ON PARKING LOT RECONFIGURATION, VICINITY OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BETWEEN 2ND AND 3RD STREETS. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated February 3, 1993. City Manager Ferrin presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Action: To 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Council Minutes 02-09-93 Page 11 • City Manager Ferrin reported: 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) City Council Committee Assignments. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated January 27, 1993. Action: To 10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. City Council Minutes 02-09-93 Page 12 CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. Coming forward to address the Council 01A) ),-, /(-,f U Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, _pave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., 6//�- erry Compton i45t7 at this time were: - 1200 Artesia Blvd., /4-7 Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., arker Herriott - 224Twenty-fourth Street, „. 7,, Jim Lissner - 271-5 El Oeste Drive, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, Edie Webber - 1210 Eleventh Street, ene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place,;!'" Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, Y� Martin Moreno - 1326 Corona Street, Marc Freeman - 1937 Palm Drive, ADJOURNMENT - The of Hermosa Beach, 10, 1993, at the Tuesday, February Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City California, adjourned on Wednesday, February hour of A.M. to the Regular Meeting of 23, 1993, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 02-09-93 Page 13 ACTION SHEET ACTION SHEET REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 9, 1993 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 7:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:40 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY BOB BLACKWOOD. ROLL CALL: ALL PRESENT - MIDSTOKKE ARRIVED LATE. EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER: Barbara Conklin, Administrative Aide, Public Works Department PUBLIC PARTICIPATION KEN MARKS, REPRESENTING THE VIETNAM VETERANS PRESENTED COUNCIL WITH CERTIFICATE FOR SUPPORT OF THE POW/MIA CAUSE. WILMA BURT - WANTS TO SPEAK ON ITEM 1(i). AW WILL PULL CM ANNOUNCED SALE OF 1993 RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMITS GO ON SALE STARTING FEB. 16 AND CITY HALL WILL BE OPEN SATURDAY FEB. 20 AND FEB. 27FOR SALE OF THE PERMITS. JERRY COMPTON - SPOKE ABOUT LEGISLATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION. SAID COUNCIL IS NOT LISTENING TO PUBLIC. CITED EXAMPLES OF R-3 HEIGHT ORDINANCE, CLOSURE OF GREENBELT PARKING LOT CAUSING A LOSS OF 150 PARKING SPACES. SAID HE IS IN SUPPORT OF RECALL. WILMA BURT = DISPUTED COMPTON'S STATEMENTS AND SAID HE DOES NOT SPEAK FOR HER. JIM ROSENBERGER - SPOKE AGAINST GREENBELT PARKING REMOVAL. SAID GREENBELT BALLOT MEASURE REQUIRED VOTE OF PEOPLE FOR ANY CHANGE IN USE WHICH WOULD INCLUDE REMOVING THE PARKING THAT WAS EXISTING AT THAT TIME. HE ANNOUNCED THE TELEPHONE NUMBERS OF SE/RE/RB FOR PEOPLE TO CALL WITH THEIR COMPLAINTS. JACK ANDREN, 521 GENTRY STREET - JOINED THE EFFORT ON RECALL BE- CAUSE OF REDUCTION OF R-3 HEIGHT LIMIT. DON FALKENSTEIN, 1412 PALM - IN SUPPORT OF EDGERTON AND BENZ. THINKS THEY ARE DOING A GOOD JOB. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on January 14, 1993; (f) 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on January 26, 1993. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Recommendation to receive and file the December, 1992 City Treasurer's report. Recommendation to receive and file the January, 1993 monthly investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated February 2, 1993. Recommendation to adopt a Land Use Analysis Program resolution in accordance with the Los Angeles County 1992 Congestion Management Program. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 26, 1993. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 93-5590. (g) Recommendation to approve Notice to Invite Bids for Public Noticing for the City of Hermosa Beach. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 1, 1993. PULLED BY KM - KM MOTION STAFF. REC. ON CONDITION THAT WHEN CONTRACT AWARDED IT WILL BE FOR A THREE YEAR PERIOD RATHER THAN INDEFINITELY. SECOND RB. OK 4-1 (AW -NO). (h) (i) Recommendation to approve an increase in the annual lease rates for fiscal years 1993-94, 1994-95, and 1995- 96 for Community Center rooms. Memorandum from Communi- ty Resources Director Mary Rooney dated February 1, 1993. Recommendation to approve request from the Association of Volleyball Professionals to hold the 2 -man Pro Beach Volleyball Tournament on August 27, 28 and 29, 1993 with a daily permit fee of $3,254 and to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract. Memorandum from Community Resour- ces Director Mary Rooney dated January 27, 1993. PULLED BY AW ON BEHALF OF WILMA BURT - WILMA BURT - FEELS THEY SHOULD BE CHARGED FOR SET UP DAYS, ALSO CHARGED FOR PARKING SPACES. JERRY COMPTON - CONCERNED ABOUT PARKING FOR PEOPLE COMING TO EVENT NOW THAT GREENBELT IS CLOSED. MARY ROONEY EXPLAINED THERE WOULD BE SHUTTLE SERVICE FROM MIRA COSTA. MOTION RB/SE FOR STAFF REC. OK 3-2 (KM/RE) RE SAID WE SHOULD BE GETTING A PERCENTAGE OF THEIR PROFITS. ALSO OBJECTED TO THE FACT THAT THE COUNCIL AND COMMISSIONERS NOT BEING GIVEN VIP SEATING. KM WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE CO-SPONSOR FEES LOOKED AT FOR FUTURE. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO AMEND TH CITY'S CONTRACT WITH PERS TO PROVIDE SECTION 20930.3 (MILITARY SERVICE CREDIT AS PUBLIC SERVICE) FOR LOCAL POLICE MEMBERS. Memorandum from Personnel Director Rob- ert Blackwood dated February 1, 1993. MOTION RE/AW - TO ADOPT RESO. 93-5591. SO ORDERED. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT WITH TH PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RE- TIREMENT SYSTEM AUTHORIZING MILITARY SERVICE CREDIT AS PUBLIC SERVICE FOR LOCAL POLICE MEMBERS. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 1, 1993. MOTION AW/SE TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE 93-1083. SO ORDERED. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM DISCUSSION. * Public comments Calendar. THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE on items removed from the Consent 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Carol Hunt, Executive Director, Chamber of Commerce, regarding annual meeting of South Bay Associa- tion of Chambers of Commerce to be held Friday, February 26. Recommended Action: Appoint Mayor or Mayor Pro Tem to attend. MOTION AW/RB TO APPOINT MAYOR PRO TEM EDGERTON TO ATTEND. SO ORDERED. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. VEHICLE PARKING ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG BEACH DRIVE. Memorandum from Councilmember Sub -Committee Wie- mans and Edgerton. MOTION RE/RB TO APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: FAILS KM/AW/SE-NO. MOTION SE/SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION WITH PROPOSED ORDINANCE. SECOND AW. FAILS KM/RE/RB-NO. MOTION KM VACATE PROPERTY WITH RESO. OF INTENT AS PROPERTY HAS NO VALUE TO THE CITY FOR THE ONLY PURPOSE THEY COULD USE IT FOR AND TO START THE PROCEEDINGS. SECOND AW. VOTE: FAILS RE/SE/RB-NO. MOTION AW/TO APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND REMOVE AMORTIZATION PERIOD. SECOND RB. VOTE: FAILS KM/RE/SE- NO). MOTION SE TO APPROVE SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION WITH FEES TO BE SET LATER. SE AMENDED HIS MOTION TO BE APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION WITH THE EAST SIDE OF BEACH DRIVE TO BE EXCLUDED, FEES TO BE DETERMINED LATER, AND AMORTIZATION EXCLUDED (ELIMINATE 7A,7B, AND 7C) OF P.C. RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: OK 3-2 (KM/RE-NO). CITY ATTY. SAID STAFF WILL BRING BACK AN ORDINANCE WHICH ES- TABLISHES THE PROVISIONS THAT WERE PART OF THE MOTION. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. AWARD OF BID FOR THE STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated February 2, 1993. MOTION RB/SE TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. OK 4-1 (AW). MOTION KM - HAVE STAFF REPORT FROM PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR WITH RECOMMENDATION ON REDUCING SPEED ON STRAND FROM 10 MPH TO 5 MPH, REPORT ON NUMBER OF TICKETS ISSUED, DIFFICULTY IN USE OF RADAR GUN, SECOND SE. RB AND RE OBJECT. KATHY CLARIFIED HER MOTION THAT SHE IS JUST ASKING FOR STAFF TO COME BACK WITH MORE INFORMATION TO GET SOME DISCUSSION GOING ON LEVEL OF ENFORCEMENT ETC. ON STRAND. SECOND RB. SO ORDERED. 7. STATUS REPORT ON PARKING LOT RECONFIGURATION, VICINITY OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BETWEEN 2ND AND 3RD STREETS. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated February 3, 1993. CONTINUED TO 2/23. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) City Council Committee Assignments. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated January 27, 1993. CONTINUED TO 2/23. 10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. B.J. MITCHELL, PATTY EGERER, PARKER HERRIOTT ALL SPOKE OF THEIR OBJECTIONS TO STRAND RECONSTRUCTION ITEM. GENE DREHER - FEELS THAT PEDESTRIANS ARE SOMETIMES THE ONES AT FAULT FOR ACCIDENTS ON STRAND. JERRY COMPTON - THREW TEABAGS AT THE COUNCIL. ADJOURNMENT AT 12:07 A.M. 5 February 3, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 23, 1993 PRESENTATION OF OUTSTANDING EMPLOYEE AWARD The City of Hermosa Beach Employee Performance Award honors City Employees who have displayed either sustained performance above expected levels or have performed a one-time action which exceeds expectations. Nominations for the award may be made by citizens, City Council Members, department heads and other employees. From the nominations, the Management Team selects the award recipient(s). For the 2nd quarter of FY 92-93 (October, November & December) the Management Team has selected the following employee for recognition. Barbara Conklin, Administrative Aide, Public Works Department Barbara has been with the City since September 1990 and is being recognized at this time for her involvement in the "work trustee program". This is a court referral program for persons who have an obligation to do community service work. Her management and coordination of this program is to be commended. Additionally, during the time period that the Public Works Department was without a permanent Director, Barbara's skills were instrumental in maintaining consistency in the Department's delivery of service. Barbara's professionalism, dedication and organizational skills are highly valued by the Department. Barbara is now being presented with a plaque to commemorate her selection as "Employee of the Quarter". Respectfully submitted; LWr Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director wp/emp Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Thursday, January 14, 1992, at the hour of 7:06 A.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Jack Wood, Commissioner ROLL CALL Present: Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Essertier Absent: Benz, Edgerton (Councilmember Edgerton arrived at 7:13 A.M.) ALSO IN ATTENDANCE: CITY OF HERMOSA BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS: Helene Frost, Jerry Newton, Patricia Spiritus, Jack Wood CITY STAFF MEMBERS: City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin, Finance Director Viki Copeland, Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski, Planning Director Michael Schubach, Community Resources Director Mary Rooney, Per- sonnel Director Robert Blackwood, Staff Liaison to the Board of Parking Place Commissioners Leroy Staten, Acting Commander John- Kearin At 7:10 A.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go item 2. ITEMS CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 12, 1993 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 1. CONSENT ORDINANCES (heard at 8:24 A.M.) (a) ORDINANCE NO. 92-1080 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT THE CREATION OF SECOND UNITS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 65852.2(c) OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE, AND ADOPTION OF AN EN- VIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 92-1080. Motion Midstokke, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Wiemans and the absence of Benz. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 92-1081 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE CREATION OF SECOND UNITS PURSUANT TO SECTION 65852.2(a) OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For. adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 92-1081. Motion Midstokke, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Wiemans and the absence of Benz. City CouncilMinutes 01- 4-93 Page 8033 laO: M 1 g 2. ADJOURNMENT TO A JOINT WORKSHOP MEETING BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS (heard at 7:10 A.M.) TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION: (a) Reconfiguration of the Vehicle Parking District Board. (b) General use of funds from the Vehicle Parking District. (c) Purchase of properties. (d) Critique of present operation. (e) Long range goals for Vehicle Parking District. The above topics were discussed in general, together, with no topic separated for special attention. Board of Parking Place Commissioner Newton gave a history of the Vehicle Parking District from its inception and spoke on the ac- complishments of the current Commission, including the negotia- tion of a contract for parking lot services that generates a - minimum revenue of $180,000 annually, for a 45% increase. Board of Parking Place Commissioner Wood added comments on the Vehicle Parking District history, noting the credit worthy his- tory of the Vehicle Parking District, and stated that the cities of San Francisco and Santa Monica, among others, had Vehicle Parking. Districts that regularly spent funds generated from park- ing place districts on improvements and services not directly connected to parking. Councilmember Edgerton stated that the present board was limited in the manner in which funds could be expended; stated a newly constituted board would have greater latitude, but would be ad- visory only and the ultimate decision would rest with the Council. General discussion ensued with Councilmembers and Commissioners expressing their views on the proposed termination of the Vehicle Parking District and the Board of Parking Place Commissioners, and, the proposed establishment of a Downtown Business Area En- hancement District Commission. CITIZEN COMMENTS - Coming forward to address the Council on this matter was: Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., stated the current district was constituted without the need for agreement by a 50% majority of the business owners; spoke on the equity of assess- ing those who had not contributed; questioned who would have control if a new Commission was instituted, would every decision have to go to City Council Minutes 01-14-93 Page 8034 • the Council; and, questioned if there would be an in -lieu fee for parking spaces in the district. The Board of Parking Place Commissioners left at 8:23 A.M.; the Council returned the agenda to item no. 1. ADJOURNMENT - The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Thursday, January 14, 1993, at the hour of 8:27 A.M. to the Adjourned Regu- lar Meeting of Wednesday, January 20, 1993, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. for the purpose of a joint meeting with the Planning Commission. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 01-14-93 Page 8035 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on January 26, 1993, at the hour of 7:41 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Wilma Burt ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Essertier Absent: None APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEM: A. Designate Mayor for a term ending November 9, 1993 Action: To designate Albert Wiemans as Mayor for a term ending November 9, 1993. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered, noting the objection of Mayor Essertier. Outgoing Mayor Essertier said that the position of Mayor is a difficult job, as the main function of the chair is to built consensus. He noted that people who were posi- tive were more apt to get their way when there was a disagreement of opinions. Mr. Essertier stated that he had voted "no" on designating Mr. Wiemans as the new Mayor due to Mr. Wiemans' support of the attempted re- call of three Councilmembers, but, he would give Mr. Wiemans his support and respect in his new position as Mayor. B. Designate Mayor Pro Tempore for a term ending November 9, 1993 Action: To designate Sam Y. Edgerton as Mayor Pro Tempore for a term ending November 9, 1993. Motion Midstokke, second Benz. So ordered, noting the objection of Edgerton. At this time newly elected Mayor Wiemans was seated and the Coun- cil nameplates changed. Mayor Wiemans presented a plaque to out- going Mayor Essertier and expressed the City's gratitude for his service as Mayor from April 14, 1992 to January 26, 1993. Mayor Wiemans said he was honored to serve as Mayor; he felt that local government works best when the Council treats all citizens with respect and demonstrates the ability to listen; that each citizen has a right to petition for grievances and expect fair and equal treat- ment for all. Mr. Wiemans continued that he considered the role of the Council as a Board of Directors, to set policy, and the City Manager as the President or CEO, to carry out that policy. He also said he would like the meetings to be concluded by 11:30 P.M. City Council Minutes 01-26-93 Page 111 C. Intergovernmental agencies requiring appointment of Mayor as delegate. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated January 19, 1993. Action: To appoint Mayor Wiemans as delegate to the Los Angeles County - City Selection Committee. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. Action: To appoint Mayor Wiemans as delegate and Mayor Pro Tempore Edgerton as alternate to the South Bay Cities Sanitation District Board of Directors. Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Edgerton. So ordered. Action: To appoint Mayor Wiemans as delegate and Mayor Pro Tempore Edgerton as alternate to the In- glewood Fire Training Authority. Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Edgerton. So ordered. The meeting recessed at 8:02 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:47 P.M. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, wished to correct statements made in an article in the "Easy Reader" regarding the recall attempt of three Councilmembers; stated there was only one person paid to collect signatures, but the re- call committee would welcome others; and that all others working on the committee were volunteers; Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, commented on statements made by Ms. Williams: said the re- call attempt was not proper; and, John McHugh - 718 First Place, suggested that the three Councilmembers subject to recall resign.. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (e), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: (c) Midstokke, (d) Es- sertier, and (e) Mayor Wiemans (as requested by Wilma Burt) . Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered. Coming forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar was: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, requested a clarification be given for item 1(e). City Council Minutes 01-26-93 Page 2 (a) Recommendation to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on January 12, 1993. Action: To approve the minutes of the regular meeting of January 12, 1993 as presented. (b) (c) (d) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. 42927, 42928, 42929, 42930 and nos. 42932 through 43029 inclusive, noting voided warrants nos. 42932, 42033, and 43934. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting, due to questions regarding agenda publication in the "Easy Reader"; report on Noise Ordinance from Public Safety, and to note that the Beach Drive parking hearing was moved up to the February 9, 1993 meeting. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. Motion Midstokke, second Edgerton. So ordered. Recommendation to authorize the City Attorney to draft an agreement with MultiVision that will require MultiVi- sion to provide up to $15,000 to the City for franchise renewal related expenses. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated January 19, 1993. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting, due to concerns regarding wording of the agree- ment and a cap on expenses, as the expense -amount was unknown at this time. Community Resources Director Rooney responded to Council questions, stated that our Ordinance did not require money for renewal. City Attorney Vose, also, responded to Council questions and stated that the Council was not approving MultiVi- sion's letter, as he would draft the letter; and, most cities also adopt updated Code provisions for renewal fees. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Chantel Hargis - MultiVision Cable TV, said the $15,000 was a good faith offer up -front to get the process moving; if costs went above that City Council Minutes 01-26-93 Page 3 (e) amount, MultiVision had indicated it would pay reasonable expenses through negotiation. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to au- thorize the City Attorney to draft an agreement with MultiVision Cable TV to require MultiVision to provide up to $15,000 to the City for Franchise renewal related expenses. Motion Midstokke, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Essertier and Mayor Wiemans. Recommendation from Planning Commission to direct City staff to investigate establishing a landscaping program for Pacific Coast Highway. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 19, 1993. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Wiemans for separate discussion later in the meeting. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, objected to starting new programs until the current pro- grams are finished; said there was a need for parking and cleaning before landscaping was considered; and, Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., said the streets where people live, such as Monterey, should be repaved if there is extra money, rather than spent on improvements to a State highway, such as Pacific Coast Highway. Action: To approve the Planning Commission recommenda- tion to direct staff to investigate the possibility of instituting a landscaping program for Pacific Coast Highway, due to it being the most traveled, therefore the most conspicuous, street in the City, and, due to its generation of 70% of the City's sales tax revenue. Motion Essertier, second Mayor Wiemans. The motion car- ried unanimously. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1(c), (d), and (e) were discussed at this time, but are shown in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the—appropriate items. City Council Minutes 01-26-93 Page 4 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Celeste Coar, 2004 Loma Drive, dated January 12, 1993 regarding building addresses on Loma Drive, with response from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated January 14, 1993. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Celeste Coar - 2004 Loma Drive, spoke on address problems on Loma: duplicate addresses from the rear of buildings fronting on Monterey, awning saying Park Drive, street signs not clearly visible; has had 911 calls going to the wrong address; requested that Councilmember Esser - tier's awning be removed, the order of the street signs at 19th Street and Loma Drive be reversed, and, trees trimmed in front of other signs; Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, said that Councilmember Essertier's address had formerly been on Loma Drive and possibly could be changed back; Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., said this was a problem throughout the City; one solution would be for houses to have "rear" after the address when it was shown on the back side of a building. Building and Safety Director Grove responded to Council questions and said there was no good solution to the problem other than adding the street name to the address. Public Works Director Charles MacDonald, also, responded to Council questions and said Public Works could change the order of the signs, and liked the idea of putting "rear" after addresses fronting on other streets. Action: To instruct Public Works to proceed with in- spection and clarification of street signs on the sub- ject streets; adding signs or reversing the order of signs if needed; and to notify property owners to keep trees trimmed to avoid blocking the visibility of street signs. Motion Midstokke, second Wiemans. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Benz and Essertier. (b) Letter January Coming forward to B.J from B.J. Mitchell, 135 31st Street, dated 12, 1993 regarding traffic on the Strand. address the Council on this item were: . Mitchell - 135 31st Street, expressed concerns with the safety of mixing bicycles and skaters with pedestrians on the Strand; said for the past two years 40% of accidents responded to by City Council Minutes 01-26-93 Page 5 the paramedics have been caused by this mixed use; spoke of the liability to the City; said her research of the beach and Strand deeds causes her to believe that the Strand can be widened, thus segregating uses; requested that the Council: 1) place a hold on the award of bids for the replacement of the Strand walk and wall; 2) have a legal review of all deeds for interpretation of uses of the beach and the Strand; and 3) ticket bicycles and skaters whose. speed exceeds five miles per hour. Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, disagreed with statements made by Ms. Mitchell; presented her recollection of Hermosa history; stated there should be no vehicles on the sand or on the Strand; Patty Egerer - (no address given), concerned with pedestrian safety; spoke of an accident to an elderly relative on the Strand; concerned that pedestrians must go to Manhattan or Redondo in order to walk safely; suggested the City work with a focus group to come to a solution; Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., said that the R/UDAT team stated that Hermosa had a world class pedestrian system that is under utilized due to safety concerns of avoiding bicycles; reminded Council that pedestrians spend money; and, Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, concerned with safety on the Strand; recalled there was a death on the Strand due to a bicycle collision with a pedestrian or a skater. Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski responded to Council questions regarding ticketing procedures on the Strand by saying there were approximately 20 tickets per month given to speeders, and, that he believed bicycle lights were not currently required on the Strand. Proposed Action: vehicular traffic per hour. Motion Edgerton, failed due to the and Midstokke. To reduce the speed limit for all on the Strand from ten to five miles second Mayor Wiemans. The motion dissenting votes of Benz, Essertier, Action: To keep everything the same; build the new wall and bikepath; and, then consider the R/UDAT suggestions. Motion Essertier, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Edgerton and Mayor Wiemans. Proposed Action: To start a citizen focus group, as suggested by Ms. Egerer. Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Edgerton. The motion City Council Minutes 01-26-93 Page 6 failed due to the dissenting votes of Benz, Edgerton, Essertier and Midstokke. The meeting recessed at 10:25 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 10:45 P.M. City Attorney Vose expressed concern that the Council should not take action on written communications when the public has not been given agenda information on pos- sible actions by the Council. The consensus of the Council was to re-establish a Coun- cil policy to either receive and file the communication or direct the item back to staff for a report and recom- mendation on a future agenda. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, questioned if receive and file on written communications was going to be the Council policy; and, Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., said if a citizen requested an item be agendized the Council could not receive and file it. (c) City Manager Ferrin said that in the future he would ensure that a recommendation was included with all writ- ten communications. Letter from John= McHugh, Janet McHugh, and Parker Her- riott dated January 12, 1993 regarding processing of hotel referendum petition. Correspondence regarding this subject also included. Supplemental letter and information from Parker Herriott, 224 24th Street, dated January 21, 1993. City Attorney Vose said the issue regarding the validity of the petition was raised by the City Clerk because of nonconformance with the State Elections Code; that it did not comply with the mandates of Section 4052; that there were very limited instances where petitions have been allowed to proceed; that this was an invalid sub- ject matter; that Council could not postpone the effec- tiveness of the conditional use permit; and, that if it went to an election, it could not be enforced. He pres- ented three options: 1) to receive and file the com- munication; 2) to direct the City Clerk to process the petition; or 3) to appropriate funding and direct the City Attorney to file for declarative relief. He recom- mended that Council receive and file. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Robert Ottinger - 719 1/2 First Street, stated he was an attorney and after reading City Attorney Vose's memoranduma, he had done research that caused him to believe the referendum was valid City Council Minutes 01-26-93 Page 7 and should be processed by the City Clerk; Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, questioned statements made by City Attorney Vose; asked if he had the right to say no to processing the referendum; and, Janet McHugh - 718 First Place, agreed with pre- vious speakers; asked that the petitions be processed in order to determine if there were enough valid signatures to place the issue on the ballot; said if the hotel did not proceed due to financial constraints the matter would not have to go to a vote. City Attorney Vose explained that once the process of a petition had begun, it must continue and cannot stop after signature verification, if found to be sufficient. Continuing to come forward to address the Council on this item were: Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., said he was normally a property rights advocate, but, ques- tioned how the City could question the validity of petitions with over 2,000 signatures; John McHugh - 718 First Place, said there had only been three public hearings on the project as the other dates were continuations requested by the hotel developer; Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., stated she believed a person had the right to do anything legal with his property, but felt this problem was created by the Council in not insisting on an 18 foot wall between the hotel and residen- tial properties; and, June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, said she believed most people did not object to the ho- tel as much as they objected to the approval of the project over the height limit. Action: To receive and file. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Mayor Wiemans. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None MUNICIPAL MATTERS 5. APPROVAL OF LIABILITY CLAIMS LITIGATION DEFENSE ATTORNEY FIRM REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) AND APPOINTMENT OF A CITY COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE TO REVIEW RESPONSES. Memo- randum from Risk Manager Robert Blackwood dated January 11, 1993. Risk Manager Blackwood presented the staff report. City Council Minutes 01-26-93 Page 8 Proposed Action: To appoint Councilmember Edgerton to the sub -committee. Motion Mayor Wiemans. The motion was withdrawn by the maker. Action: To appoint Councilmember Edgerton and Mayor Wiemans as a Council sub -committee to review responses. Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Edgerton. 6. REPORT ON DOING PUBLIC NOTICING IN-HOUSE. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated January 20, 1993. Supplemental memorandum from City Treasurer Gary Brutsch, dated January 25, 1993. City Manager Ferrin presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Cathy Schulte - South Bay Noticing, said she wanted to continue to do the work, but, cannot afford to continue the current contract; stated that there was a great deal of outside work as the addresses had to be verified in the field for completeness; said she wanted to keep the fee the same, but, have the City pay for postage and for Data Quick (more accurate/up-to-date than the County) and allow all City Departments to use the information; and, June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, said that in the past the City had analyzed the cost and found that it is normally cheaper to go with an independent contractor as staff salary includes the costs of benefits that are not paid to an independent contractor. Proposed Action: To allow the City Manager to negotiate with the independent contractor and stay with the cur- rent contractor or whichever contractor the City Manager recommends, but, to not do the City noticing in-house. Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Edgerton. The motion fails due to the dissenting votes of Benz, Edgerton, Esser - tier, and Midstokke. Proposed Action: To direct the City Manager to continue with the current independent contractor, but not allow the use of City equipment for a private business; make no amendment to the contract. Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Wiemans. The motion was withdrawn by the maker. Proposed Action: To direct staff to study a proposed pay increase for the current independent contractor and bring the report back to Council for approval, rebid, or to do noticing in-house. City Council Minutes 01-26-93 Page 9 Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Wiemans. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Benz, Essertier, and Midstokke. Action: To rebid the contract. Motion Essertier, second Midstokke. The motion carried unanimously. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager Ferrin reported that due to the audio dif- ficulties at the start of the live broadcast of to- night's meeting, the first part of the meeting would be replayed tonight immediately after the close of the meeting, and the entire meeting would be rebroadcast later on January 27, 1993,starting at noon. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Memorandum from Planning Commission dated January 19, 1993 requesting involvement in Strand wall replacement. City Manager Ferrin reported that the Planning Commis- sion had had an opportunity to review the project, but it had changed since that time; said large projects of this type would go before the Planning Commission in the future. Action: To invite all interested Planning Commission members to attend the next Council meeting, February 9, 1993, to speak before the bid was awarded, since time constraints precluded going through a lengthier process. Motion Edgerton, second Midstokke. So ordered. 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Councilmember Midstokke reported that she had watched the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting where three of the Commissioners had felt they had been insulted by the Council on the issue of a fence on the Greenbelt at Eighth Street. Ms. Mid- stokke wished to personally apologize if this was the feeling of the Commission. Mayor Wiemans announced the death of Grace Rodaway, sister of Edith Rodaway, last week in Redondo Beach. Mayor Wiemans said that Grace Rodaway had been born in 1911; had been a charter member of St. Cross Episcopal Church in Hermosa; and, was survived by one sister living in the midwest. The Mayor directed that the meeting be adjourned in her memory. City Council Minutes 01-26-93 Page 10 CITIZEN COMMENTS - None ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned in memory of Grace Rod - away, sister to Edith Rodaway, on Wednesday, January 27, 1993, at the hour of 12:07 A.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, February 09, 1993, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Cda,07n4-- A;A2—, Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 01-26-93 Page 11 v „7 4r FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:09:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H CREATIVE JUICES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/25/93 PAGE 0001 J DATE 01/25/93 VND MACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * I,.J DATE INYC PROD_ _ _ACCOUNT_DESCRIP_T.ION__ _._ _..___..AMOUNT UNENC . DATE EXP__ . 04981 001-400-4601-4302 00206 $466.01 TYPESET SPRING BROCHURE 01/13/93 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING ***_VENDOR TOTAL **********air******************************************************** $466 01 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243' 001-202-0000-2030 00528$314.735.48 PAYROLL/1-1 TO 1-15-93 01/19/93 /ACCRUED PAYROLL _***_VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $314,13a,48 ROSS*LEWIS & ASSOCIATES 00644 001-400-2101-4312 02064 $414.00 REO/WISNIEWSKI/FERRIN'01/19/93. POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • $414,0_0 06314. _ 43030._..._ 30.00 01/25/93 43032 $0.00 01/25/93 6 n n 05914...___43031..____.-1 *0.00 01/25/93 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00640 *96.962.20 RETIREMENT ADVANCE/DEC92 01/11/93. RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT *0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************$94,9.42-28 *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 17 PORTABLE RADIOS/PD *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 66755 *412,577.77 00935 170-400-2103-5402 00069 328,197.23 12/31/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS/EGUIP-MORE THAN $500 66755 06125 $28.197.23 4, $28.197.23 R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00857 001-400-2101-4306 01312 361.50 PRISONER MEALS/JAN 93 7213 01/15/93 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 45 ARATEX/RED STAR UTILITY RAGS/DEC ARATEX/RED STAR UTILITY RAGS/DEC INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-2201-4309 01424 92 12/31/92 FIRE INDUSTRIAL 92 00152 12/31/92 001-400-3104-4309 TRAFFIC $61.50 3., 01/25/93 �" J 43036 _. 01/25/93 0 J n • U 9.1 9] ;'I 7213 00015 : 43037. $0.00... 01/25/93 '' J $89.00 . 00017._.._ 43038 "' /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 30.00 01/25/93 °' 6.1 J 01006 *54.90 00017 43038 __ '+ SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/25/93 J FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 14:09:49 PAY VENDOR NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/25/93 PAGE 0002 DATE 01/25/93 VND ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-4204-4309 02544 $238.80 00017 43038 , 1 ! UTILITY RAGS/DEC 92 12/31/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.0001/25/93 2(/:,E1= INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-4205-4309 00694 ' $64.70 00017 43038. UTILITYARAT 12/31/92 EQUIP SERVICE 7HAIRtENANak MATERIALS $0.00 01/25/93 ' — R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 110-400-3302-4309 00888 $8.27 00017 43038 ----. —UTILITY .- RAGS/DEC 92 12/31/92 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/25/93 .-: *** VENDOR TOTAL $455.67 • it • , J 2 1.,.! R AVIATION LOCK & KEY . 00407 001-400-2101-4309 00590 $111.13 00127 43039 MISC CHARGES/DEC 92 12/31/92 POLICE • /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00-01/25/93 • 0 R AVIATION LOCK & KEY 00407 160-400-3102-4309 00765 : $90.80 - 00127 43039 ...... ._.:f ! i MISC CHARGES/DEC 92 12/31/92 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/25/93 • !.I! *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************* **** *********************************** ******** $201. 93 3 I • 1 _ . 1..,1 • RB &A... CRANE SERVICE - 02442 115-400-8152-4201 00006 $165.00 . 06006 43040 _ BEACON/AVIATION & OCEAN 12/23/92 CIP 152 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $200.00 01/25/93 1 LI *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************* ***** ******************************** $165.00 4 LI 11 • . ::: R BANK OF AMERICA 01195 001-400-1141-4201 00146$2,036.10 1-91102-99999 03887 43041 H-- i" BANK CHARGES/NOV 92 99999 01/12/93 CITY TREASURER /CONTRACT ERVib-UPRIVAT $0.00-01/25/93 I *** VENDOR TOTAL ************ ******* **************** ***** ******************* ********* $2,036.10 ... , R SUSAN*BIGELOW ASSOCIATES 04443 001-400-1121-4201 00078 $6,666.00 ' PMTI-9/10 00073 43042 __ CONTRACT PMT/DEC92—JAN93 —9/1O 01/19/93 CITY CLERK /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT so.oq.::...: 01/25/93 ,.. 14, *** VENDOR TOTAL ********** ***** ************ ***** ******* ***** *************** ***** **** $6,666.00 • . - • • • .. . • ,R BLACKTOP.MATERIALS.00... ,A • .04352 001-400-3103-4309 01463$60.62 39219 00129 43043 . ....1- MISC,CHARGES/DEC 1992 39219 12/31/92 ST,MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.06---01/25/93 • , ***I.VENDOR. TOTAL ********* ****************4*************,******************** ******* ** $60. 62 .,1!I , I ,. 1.:..• • . • i • . 11 • • . . t • R TROY*BOND 04967 001-400-4601-4221 00149 $126.00 . 06307 43044 _c FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 01/14/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR *0.00 01/25/93 : !„1 , ...4 . . t..c. . Y — ----- ..• lb qb s :; • ; I FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:09:49 PAY VENDOR NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/25/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL *** ***** * *************** *********** ***** ******* ********* ************ PAGE 0003 DATE 01/25/93 INV/REF PO * AMOUNT UNENC $126. 00. BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 00163 PRISONER LAUNDRY/DEC 92 CHK DATE EXP , - 001-400-2101-4306 01311 *306.35 .....___ _ 01210 43045 _ r - POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/25/93 ,-; , - 12/31/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******* ***** ******************************************************** R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES DUMP CHARGES/DEC 92 37002 *306. 35 00158 001-400-3103-4201 00445 *3,305.91 921200-0037002_00004_ 43046 12/31/92 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 01/25/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL ** ****** ***************************** ***** ************************** • - 'I *3. 305. 91 00630 001-400-4201-4201 R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CK/58 11TH ST 4837 R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CK/1051-53 MONTEREY 4837 01/04/93 BUILDING 00630 001-400-4201-4201 01/04/93 BUILDING R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. 00630 PLAN CK/1100 P.C.H. 4837 01/04/93 R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CK/1414 P. C. H. R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CK/2420 P.C.H. VENDOR TOTAL 001-400-4201-4201 BUILDING 1,1 00834 *151. 32 4837 04267_ 43047 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *84.24 01/25/93 00835 *912.60 4837 ; 04250 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *912.60 01/25/93 L1 00836 *907.66 4837 04262 43044 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $907.66 01/25/93 11. 00630 001-400-4201-4201 00837 4837 01/04/93 BUILDING 00630 001-400-4201-4201 00838 4837 01/04/93 BUILDING *787. 54 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 4837 04261 43047 $787.54 01/25/93 *140. 00 4837 04275 .___. 43047 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/25/93 111 *** ****** *********** ***** ***************************** ***** ********* R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY COMPUTER PAPER/STOCK 91661 *2. 899. 12 00034 001-400-1206-4305 00587 *1,058.80 191661 04039 43048 12/29/92 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 31,063.17 01/25/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***** ***** ************************* ***** **************************** $1,058.80 CAL TYPE OFFICE MACHINE8, INC. 02417 001-400-1208-4201 00961 _ *225,00_ 504745_08070 43049 FAX MACHINE-MAINT/FY 93 04945 01/05/93 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVA-T *0.00 01/25/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******** ***** ************i****************** ******** ******** ****** ** *225.00 R CALIF PEACE OFFICERS ASSOC 01796 001-400-2101-4312 02065 *129.00 REGISTRATION/ELLEDGE 01/13/93 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE • POST 05915 ._ 43050 *0.00 01/25/93 IT: war FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:09:49 PAY VENDOR NAME ij DESCRIPTION *It* VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/25/93 VND ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 41-11-11.41-11111111.11.11.414.11.41.11.11-114•11-11•11-11•11.11•1111.*********11-11114-11.************************ R CARE STATION PAGE 0004 DATE 01/25/93 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNTUNENC DATE EXP_ *129. 00. 4 03972 705-400-1217-4182 00268 *88.00 13882-0 MED TREATMENT/H. TUBBS 882-0 01/07/92 .WORKERS COMP JWORKER6 COMP CURRENT YR **Ai VENDOR TOTAL **nom* ********* 41.••••••••••••• ******** ••• ***** ••••••••• ************* 414 R CINTAS CORPORATION 00153 UNIFORM RENT/DEC 92 12/31/92 R CINTAS CORPORATION 00153 UNIFORM RENT/DEC 92 12/31/92 001-400-4202-4187 PUB WKS 110-400-3302-4187 PARKING *88. 00 00221 *841.75 ADMIN /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 00389 $52.50 05535 _ 43051 *0.00 01/25/93 ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE **If VENDOR TOTAL •••••.** ***** 41 -114•••••••••••* -1144 ******* m•••••••••••*****••••••••••••••• R *894. 25 00002 43052 *0.00 01/25/93 , # 0000243052 k. *0.00__01/25/93_ - COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 LONG DISTANCE/DEC 92 12/31/92 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/DEC 92 COM SYSTEMS, INC 001-400-1121-4304 00596 CITY CLERK 00017 001-400-1131-4304 00433 12/31/92 CITY ATTORNEY 00017 LONG DISTANCE/DEC 92 12/31/92 R COM SYSTEMS, INC t.; LONG DISTANCE/DEC 92 001-400-1141-4304 00614 ;!7 *1.40 01217 43054 *0.00 01/25/93 0 $0.79 1217 *0.00 01/25/93 " /TELEPHONE /TELEPHONE CITY TREASURER *11.34 /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-1201-4304 00666 $14.18 12/31/92 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 1 LONG DISTANCE/DEC 92 12/31/92 R 'COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/DEC 92 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/DEC 92 R COM SYSTEMS, INC 01217 43054 *0.00 01/25/93 • 01217 _ 43054 *0.00 01/25/93 001-400-1202-4304 00668 $60.04 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-1203-4304 00678 $21155 12/31/92 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-1206-4304 00596 *11. 23 12/31/92 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-1207-4304 00469 LONG DISTANCE/DEC 92 . 12/31/92 •s, R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 LONG DISTANCE/DEC 92 12/31/92 BUS LICENSE 001-400-2101-4304 01167 *5.91 /TELEPHONE *269. 13 POLICE /TELEPHONE 01217 43054 4: ''j • *0.00 01/25/93-1- -, 0121743054 _k *0.00 -01/25/93 01217 43054 $0.00 01/25/93-, / 01217 43054 *0.00 01/25/93 r, I 01217 43054 ,4 • *0.00 01/25/93-- • 'A 11 tr/ • 99, wl FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:09:49 PAY VENDOR NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/25/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN-B:. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PRO./ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R COM SYSTEMS, INCey LONG DISTANCE/DEC 92 12/31/92 PLANNING /TELEPHONE 00017 001=400-4201-4304 _..__00599 $0_92 12/31/92 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-4101-4304 00671 $36.21 R _ _ COM SYSTEMS, _INC LONG DISTANCE/DEC 92 PAGE 0005 DATE 01/25/93 INV/REF PO * CHK * -J, AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R COM SYSTEMS, _INC 00017 001-400-4202-4304 00726 LONG DISTANCE/DEC 9212/31/92 PUB WKS ADMIN R _ COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/DEC 92 12/31/92 $32.90 /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-4601-4304 00779 $19.88 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/DEC 92 1 000017 105-400-2601-4304 00224 $2.1 2/31/92 STREET LIGHTING /TELEPHONE COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/DEC 92 01217 ___ 43054 _ $0.00 01/25/93-- 01217 43054 $0.00 01/25/93 ..1 91.9 01217_ __ 43054 $0.00 01/25/93 012217_..... $0.00 43054 ___ 01/25/93 43054._1 ,49 1 01217....__. $0.00 01/25/93 00017 110-400-3302-4304 __....00685 $125.69 12/31/92 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE 01217.. 43054 $0.00 01/25/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************************+r********* $620.28 R BARBARA*CONKLIN 03929 001-400-4202-431600261 _ _$584 04 REIMD TUIT/BOOKS/SPR 93 01/19/93 PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL R CSFA PUBLICATIONS/FIRE *** VENDOR TOTAL ✓ ry, 42, * * * $584.04 04992 001-400-2201-4305 00595 $9.50 12/31/92 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ******************************************************************** $9.50 06043 _ $0.00 1.1 s 43055 01/25/93 4r 03480..___. 43056. $9.50 01/25/93 R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE & 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00207 $174.96 SHELTER COSTS/DEC 92 01/10/93 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT ******************************************************************** VENDOR TOTAL DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 00049 SEISMIC FEES/OCT-DEC 92 01/07/93 $174.96 00014. __ 43057 ,. _.__'ff $O. 00, 01/25/93 00.1-300-0000-320402851 $233.07__ 04273 /BUILDING PERMITS $0.00 ***-VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** THE *DEVELOPMENT 00147 MISC CHARGES/DEC 1992 12/31/92 $233.07 001=400-2101-4305_Q1919 $55...55.__...._ POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 43058._ _ 01/25/93 ;; 01220.....___43059 __...k $0.00 01/25/93 7.' • J FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:09:49 PAY VENDOR NAME _DESCRIPTION R I • 1 ;2, 191 .VND * DATE INVC CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/25/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT PROJ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION THE *DEVELOPMENT •AISC CHARGES/DEC 1992 00147 001-400-4201-4305 00830 12/31/92 BUILDING $49. 69 PAGE 0006 DATE 01/25/93 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP. /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R DIGITAL COMPUTER DIGITAL --COMPUTER *** VENDOR TOTAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION MAINT/JAN93 14393 EQUIPMENT CORPORATION MAINT/JAN93 14393 00269 01/06/93 00269 01/06/93 001-400-2101-4201 POLICE $105.24 01220 43059 $0.00 01/25/93 a .0 1 1 .4 or 01187 4913.32 341714393 00007 4306016 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT -$0.00 01/25/93- :n 19 001-400-2201-4201 00360 4608.87 341714393 00007 43060 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/25/93 ' ? *********** ***** * ********* ** ********* * ****** *********** ************ * $1,522.19 R EASY READER 00181 001-400-1121-4323 00218 $426.51 12/31/92 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING PUBLIC NOTICES/DEC 92 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************* ************** ****** ***** * *********** ******* *********** $426. 51 01226 43061 _ $0.00 01/25/93 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHARGES/DEC 92 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC-tHARGES/DEC 92 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHARGES/DEC 92 00165 12/31/92 00165 12/31/92 00165 12/31/92 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO MISC-tHARGES/DEC 92 PARTS 00165 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHARGES/DEC 92 R R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHARGES/DEC 92 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTOPARTS MISC CHARGES/DEC 92 001-400-2101-4311 POLICE 01574 $761.40 27 20 .33 t,1 01227 43062 *0.00 -61/25/93- " • /AUTO MAINTENANCE 001-400-2401-4311 00297 $93.75 ANIMAL CONTROL /AUTO MAINTENANCE 001-400-3103-4311 00842 4413.68 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 001-400-4204-4311 00237 $71.19 12/31/92 00165 12/31/92 00165 12/31/92 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC CHARGES/DEC 92 00165 12/31/92 • 00165 a • 01227 43062 _1,) $0.00 01/25/45 4. w . , 01227 43062 • $0.00 01/25/93 01227 43062 BLDG MAINT /AUTO MAINTENANCE 001-400-4205-4309 00692 $76.85 -, $0.00 01/25i93 01227 43062 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 001-400-4205-4310 00252 $70.60 433 $0.00„:. 01/25/93 L: 01227 43062 $0.00 01/25/93 L EQUIP SERVICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 001-400-6101-4311 PARKS 00301 $105. 55 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 105-400-2601-4311 00307 $97.45 12/31/92 • STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE 01227 43062 I $0. 00 01/25/93 • • 01227 43062 • • • $0.00 .33 '61 /?, • r,l 10 n FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 14:09:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/25/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 MISC CHARGES/DEC 92 12/31/92 110-400-3302-4311 00848 $358.65 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 160-400-3102-4311 00221 $23.33 12/31/92 MISC CHARGES/DEC 92 L PAGE 0007 JJ DATE_.01/25/93 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP SEWER/ST DRAIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************•r****************a************•* $2,072.45 R VIRGINIA*ELLEDGE_ MEALS/P. 0. S. T. CLASS 01227 _____43062 $0.00 01/25/93 01227 43062 $0.00 01/25/93 . U 1) is U • ) 03797 001-400-2101-4312 . -' 02066 $16.00 05916_ 43063 _ IBJ 01/13/93 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST $0.00 01/25/93-7I *** VENDOR TOTAL***•r**************************************************************** $16.00 24 R MARGARET*ENDERS ROSE PARADE TRIP REFUND 47611 '.3 V/ 2,1 4) 05025 001-400-4601-4201 01641 $75.50 47611 06312 43064 n� 01/06/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/25/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $_75_,50 EXECUTIVE—SUITE SERVICES INC. 01294_ 00.1=400-4204-4201 #.1..325,00 12/31/92 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT JANITOR SERVICE/DEC 92 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** '•1 ✓ ,I 41 ✓ .4) R STEVE*FILLMAN $1.325.00 03169 001-400-4601-4221 00147 $546.00 FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 01/14/93 COMM RESOURCES ,/CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $546.00 JI J/ 1.I •I $0.00 01/25/93 11 41 06310. _43066 _ nl $0.00 01/25/93 R GANDALF DATA, INC. 01432 001-400-1206-4201 01084 $546.00 5514 00018 MODEM MAINT/JAN—MAR 93 5514 01/05/93 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $546.00 47 43067____1 01/25/93 GTEL 01340 001-400-1101-4304 0053.1 $3,_62 01/01/93 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE PHONE SYS MAINT/JAN 93 4.1 GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JAN 93 W 9J 00067. _ _43069_ ... $0.00 01/25/93 01340 001-400-1121-4304 00597 $9.82 00067 _43069 _• 01/01/93 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE *0.00 01/25/93 ..4 .I r4 J FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:09:49 , I 1.‘ PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GTEL ;.• • . 01 i • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/25/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PHONE SYSWINT/JAN 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JAN 93 R GTEL PHONE-SYS-MAINT7UAR-93 R GTEL "PHONE SYS MAINT/JAN 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JAN R GTEL 01340 PHONE SYS MAINT/JAN 93 01/01/93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JAN 93 01340 001-400-1131-4304 00434 01/01/93 PAGE 0008 J,0 DATE 01/25/93 ;4- n j INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNTUNENC DATE EXP $5. 16 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1141-4304 00615 $9.82 01/01/93 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1201-4304 00667 $8.27 01/01793 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1202-4304 00669 $29.96 01/01/93 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1203-4304 00679 01/01/93 PERSONNEL R GTEL ----PHONE SYS MAINT/JAN 93 GTEL HONE SYS MAINT/JAN 93 $12.40 /TELEPHONE 001-400-1206-4304 00597 $14.98 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1207-4304 00470 $9.82 01/01/93 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE 01340 • 001-400-1208-4304 00274 $5.16 01/01/93 GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-2101-4304 01168 01/01/93 $193. 73 POLICE R GTEL 01340 001-400-2201-4304 PHONE SYS MAINT/JAN 93 01/01/93 FIRE R 1 GTEL 01340 001-400-2401-4304 00520 PHONE SYS MAINT/JAN 93 01/01/93 /TELEPHONE 00515 $5. 16 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JAN 93 R GTO_ /TELEPHONE *7. 23 00067 43069 _ $0.00 01/25/93 00067 •43069 $0.00 01/25/93 00067 43069. _ $0.06 01/25/93 00067 43069 $0.00- -01/25/93 00067 $0. 00 43069 01/25/93 00067 __ 43069 $0.00 01/25/93 • , • a 0 22 0 00067 $0.00 - 43069 01/25/93 --' 00067 43069 $0.00 01/25/93 '1 y. • 00067 43069 $0.00 01/25/93 ' ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-4101-4304 00672 $24.80 -- 01/01/93 PLANNING /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-4201-4304 00600 PHONE SYS MAINT/JAN 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JAN 93 R GTE - 01/01/93 BUILDING 01340 001-400-4202-4304 00727 01/01/93 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE ' 01340 001-400-4601-4304 00780 01/01/93 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE PHONE SYS MAINT/JAN 93 00067_ 43069 $0.00 61/25/93 r" 00067 43069 0 $0.00 01/25/93Th 43069 $0.00.- 01/25/93 00007 43069 *0.0001/25/93-7- $39.78 /TELEPHONE $54. 76 $14. 98 00067 43069_, $0.00 01/25/93 00067 43069 $0.00 01/25/93 • 1 , 4.0 1 FINANCE—SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST TIME 14:09:49 FOR 01/25/93 PAY VENDOR NAME 1 ti R GTEL VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT_UNENC R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JAN 93 01340 001-400-6101-4304 00478 01/01/93 PARKS GTEL 01340 PHONE SERV/G.S. REORG 50428 01/13/93 $5.16 /TELEPHONE LJ PAGE 0009 Ll DATE.01/25/93 1 N CHK M .J DATE EXP 00067_______ 43069. $0.00 01/25/93 7 4J Q01 -40Q-8616-4201. 000Q1 $2,.762._60 _ __..CH50428._._05174. .__..43069 ....._ 1J CIP 90-616 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/25/93 01340 110-400-3302-4304 00686 $61.99 00067.__ 43069 01/01/93 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE PHONE SYS MAINT/JAN 93 *** VENDOR TOTAL J HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 001-400-2101-4311 01577 $3,279.20 $116.00 $0.00 01/25/93 d �J 01236 43070 31 231 0 24, .,..,3, UnrinvGlIuGU -, 12/:!1/Yd POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 40.00 01/25/93 :G ''i HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 105-400-2601-4311 00309 $4.00 01236 43070 •n MISC CHARGES/DEC 92 12/31/92 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/25/93 •' HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 110-400-3302-4311 00850 �' .' $4.00 01236____43070 ._ MISC CHARGES/DEC 92 12/31/92 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00---01/25/9i " L, R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 170-400-2103-431.1..__..00089 'n w *4,00 01236.__...43070 _ n MISC CHARGES/DEC 92 12/31/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 01/25/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $128.00 I; L. R LORI*HIGGINS 03404 001-400-4601-4221 00146 *186.20 AH150 05791 43071 •!'" `, FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR AH150 01/14/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR $0.00 01/25/93 ,' ,.*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $186.20 <, 1, „ 1..1.I ,•, R HINDERLITERDE_._LLAMAS ASSOC. 03131 001-400-1202-4201 00348 $1,047.09 .__& _ . 101300054 __ 43072 __ :.SALES TAX SERV/OCT—DEC92 1015 01/11/93 FINANCE ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00.. 01/25/93 `°' 41 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,047.09 4, 44 4 R INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATIONOF 00567 001-400-2101-4315 0226 $100.00 418355 06136 _ 43073 ._.I'' K ANNUAL DUES/WISNIEWSKI 18355 01/14/93 POLICE /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 01/20/93 r,il 4, ***.VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100.00 ,. 4`, R INTERNATIONALCONF OF BUILDING 00667._ 001-400-4201-4316 00304 $1.045.00 04274 43074 __ REG/DIR/3 INSPECTORS 01/08/93 DUILDING /TRAINING $0.00 01/25/93 2 . S I "'I 4) 1 •• FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:09:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PACE 0010 FOR 01/25/93 DATE 01/25/93 , PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND IS DATE INVC ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN St AOUNT INV/REF PO # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP jj PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION — G j VENDOR TOTAL *************** **** ************************************ ***** ******** $1,045.0Q o 7 - i • R LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. •', 04303 001-400-6101-4201 00311 ' $13,185.50 _ __ 8995 00073:43075 ------ --PARKS MAINT/DEC 92 8995 12/31/9 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 01/25/93 • *** VENDOR TOTAL *************************************************** ********* ******** *8,585.50 , , R LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES , , 00317 001-400-1201-4316 00082 *205.00,•., TR413 00413 ..43076 _ ..., CONF REG/R. FERRIN TR413 01/12/93 CITY MANAGER /TRAINING *0.00 01/25/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL *********** ****** *************************** ************************ *205.00 R LEARNED LUMBER MISC CHARGES/DEC 92 n ;!r 21 00167 001-400-4204-4309 02543 *111.06 01238 43077 12/31/92 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 01/25/93 1-'• 1 *** VENDOR TOTAL *111. 06 * * * R LEGAL BOOKSTORE, INC. PENAL CODE COPIES/POLICE 11785 VENDOR TOTAL 00738 001-400-2101-4305 01918 *272.31 01/04/93 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *272. 31 811785 06123 43078 *272.30 • 01/25/93 a R STUART*LEVCHENKO 04252 001-400-4601-4221 00148 *105. 00 05792 43079 •, 1•-• • ;‘ . , FALL CLAS5 INSTRUCTOR 01/14/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR *** VENDOR TOTAL ***** ***** *************** ***** ** ***** *************** ****** ********** $105.00 *0.00 01/25/93 1 ] ,-, R LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON 02175 001-400-1203-4201 01004 *1,017.50 05533 _ 43080 01/25/93 J 1 - , LEGAL SERVICES/NOV 92 01/07/93 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL *1,017.50 $0.00 u t., _ R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. 00077 115-400-8144-4201 00003 *391.73 01240 *0.00 43081 01/25/93 1 .,,. MISC CHARGES/DEC 92 12/31/92 CIP 90-144 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT • *** VENDOR TOTAL *** ******* ***************************************** ******* * ******** * *391.75 • R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. 01320 001-400-2101-4187 00514 *346.29 108653 06119 43082 01/25/93 _ 1 UNIFORM PANTS/THOMPSON 08653 12/16/92 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *346.29 1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:09:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/25/93 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. INITIAL UNIFORM/DRESTE 09439 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 01320 110-400-3302-4187 00388 12/28/92 PARKING ENF $423.85 PAGE 0011 DATE 01/25/93, IJ 1J INV/REF PO M CHK M ,l.J AMOUNT._.UNENCDATE EXP _ /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LOS ANGELES CASH REGISTER CO. CASH REGISTER MANUAL 10355 109439 05146_______43082_ _ 1423.85 01/25/93 $770.14 03967 _ 001-400-8.61.6-4305 00001 $12.91 01/11/93 CIP 90-616 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MARX BROTHERS SEMI -ANN FIRE HOOD INSP 11880 *** VENDOR TOTAL R KENNETH A.*MEERSAND LEGAL SERV/NOV 92 "3 10 .s11 $12.91 10355 03886_ 43083 $0.00 01/25/93- " kJ 03183 001-400-4204-4321 00702 $150.00 111880 06012 __ 43084 _ 12/21/92 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT $150.00 01/25/93 04138 01/04/93 R KENNETH A.*MEERSAND 04138 LEGAL SERV/DEC 92 01/13/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL 001-400-1132-4201 00128 CTY PROSECUTOR 001-400-1132-4201 00129 CTY PROSECUTOR $150..J)0 21 L1 �)9 $5,600.00 06130__43085..._,31 *0.00 01/25/93 $5,600.00 06137 ___... 43085'. $0.00 01/25/93 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R VALERIE*MOHLER REIMB BOOKS/SPRING 93 *11,200.00 00956 001-400-1202-4316 00440 $54.67 01/25/93 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $54.67 R - OFFICE DEPOT 04142 001-400-1208-4305 01170 01/05/93 GEN APPROP MISC OFFICE SUPP/STOCK 83639 *** VENDOR TOTAL 05642 43086 $0.00 01/25/93 39 39 40 .11 1, iJ LJ 471 SJ .1.14 '1 1 1J $283_72 883639 05625 ._.__.__ 43087 ____ �� $285.78 01/25/93 I /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 41.***—******* ***** ****************************************** ********** 1• R OLIVER._ BARR .__&VOSE 02892 LEGAL SERV/NOV 92 01/14/93 R OLIVER, BARR & VOSE 1 02892 LEGAL SERV/NOV 92 01/14/93 001-400-1131-4201 00758 CITY ATTORNEY 001-400-1131-4201 00759 420001 CITY ATTORNEY $2B3.72 _$15,548.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $825.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 02172____ 43088 ... *0.00 01/25/93 02172 43088 I°• $0.00 01/25/43-V JJ 8J FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:09:49 J.. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0012 I J FOR 01/25/93 • DATE 01/25/93 ..: : H ! l'. . PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * *** VENDOR TOTAL ************* ***** ****************** ***** *************************** _ _DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION $16,373.50 _. AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP -11:';'::: 2 4* PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE 00321 • 001-400-2101-4304 01169 $150.1000036 43089 /TELEPHONE !..• COMPUTER HOOKUPS/JAN 93 01/01/93 POLICE _ $0.00 01/25/93 :., *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************* ***** ******************** *********** * $150.10 1.. -I, R RON*PONCIANO • 02967 001-400-4601-4221 00150 $252.0043090 ,,, ,... 1 FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 01/14/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR 06309 $0.00 01/25/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL $252. 00 POSTMASTER P.O. BOX RENTAL/CITES *** VENDOR TOTAL 4, 1 00097 001-400-1204-4305 00001 $93. 00 BOX -728 05640 43091 !.n X-728 01/21/93 FINANCE CASHIER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 01/25/93 4 $93. 00 R PRO TECH FORMS MGMT SYS, INC. WORKERS' COMP CHECKS 16749 04167 01/05/93 705-400-1217-4201 00162 $175.69 16749 05536 WORKERS COMP /CONTRACTSERVIC000iIVAT $0.00 • 43092- 01/25/93 - ! *** VENDOR TOTAL **************** ************ ****** **************** * ********* * ******* $175.69 ..! --I- . R PROF COMMUNICATIONS INSTALLERS 02526 001-400-2101-4311 01576 $890.63 933-35/42-43 0125743093 • $0.00 - -01/25/93 MISC CHARGES/DEC 92 42-43 12/31/92 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE - --- *** VENDOR TOTAL **************************** ********** ****************************** $890.63 .:, y> R CITY OF*REDONDO BEACH ' . , 03282 001-400-1101-4319 00147 $81.07 42819 --- 02173.43094 $0.00- 01/25/93 •,. .17 "MAMA LIZ" TRANSIT SERV 42819! *** VENDOR TOTAL , 01/06/93 CITY COUNCIL /SPECIAL EVENTS $81.07 ..., ... R SHOOP & LUTHER. INC. 02310 001-400-4203-4310 00251 $241.87 23E163/23895 06029 43095 $232.35—.01/25/93 .., - HYDRAULIC OIL/CITY YARD 23895. *** VENDOR TOTAL 12/22/92 EGUIP SERVICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $241.87 • ,, • • R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-400-4204-4309 02542 $78.22 . 01261 43096 • MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 12/31/92 • BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/25/93 _ • 31 a. MI, • . FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:09:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/25/93 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL*******►*********************•r*****************************a******** •"1 R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 • n nn R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 00114 001-400-2101-4306 01313 12/31/92 POLICE 00114 001-400-4601-4308 00795 12/31/92. COMM RESOURCES INV/REF PO AMOUNT_ UNENC $78.22 PAGE 0013 i., DATE 01/25/93 N CHK $ , 1._) DATE EXP _4 $76.58 _________01262 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 $133.28 /PROGRAM MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** v v R SMOG EXPRESS MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 R SMOG EXPRESS MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 R SMOG EXPRESS MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 SMOG EXPRESS •MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 R SMOG EXPRESS MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 04987 001-400-2101-4311 01575 12/31/92 POLICE 04987 001-400-4204-4311 00238 12/31/92 BLDG MAINT 04987 001-400-4205-4311 00291 12/31/92 EQUIP SERVICE R $209.86 $19.95 43097 01/25/93 01262 43097 $0.00 01/25/93 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $19.95 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 04987 105-400-2601-4311 00308 12/31/92 STREET LIGHTINQ 04987 110-400-3302-4311 00849 12/31/92 PARKING ENF 6 IJ 11 I:" is :v l J 1J „ J.J 01282 43098 _. _ $0.00 01/25/95 J_ 01282 ___. 43098 $0.00 01/25/93 11 iJ $19.95 01282____43098. _--J" $0.05-_ 0.00 01 /25/93 i" /AUTO MAINTENANCE $39.90 01282 ____43098 __ /AUTO MAINTENANCE $19.95 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $119.70 R !I SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 110-300-0000-3302 49453 $14,933.00 CITE SURCHARGE/DEC 92 01/12/93 $0.00 01/25/93 01282__ 43098 $0.00 01/25/93 "•i /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY NOTICING AND PUB NOTICING/DEC92/JAN93 9301A A, A" * * * SOUTH BAY NOTICING AND PUB NOTICING/DEC92/JAN93 9301A VENDOR TOTAL 03882 001-400-1121-4323 00 01/07/93 CITY CLERK $14,933. 00 05637 ___43099____ $0.00 01/25/93 i 00164 43100 _ I. 4.1 $0.00 01/25/93 219 $115.00 92HER12B/9301A /PUBLIC NOTICING 03882_...___001=400.4101-4201.._..._001.80. 01/07/93 PLANNING 92HER1213/9301A_.00164 . __ 43100 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 01/25/93 $34_5.00 SOUTH.... BAY WELDERS 00018 001-400-3103-4309.....__.01465 $15,.50 12/31/92 ST MAINTENANCE •/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 01265_____43101..._ '!!! $0.00 01/25/93 ,1 fl FINANCE–SFA340 TIME 14:09:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * DATE INVC R SOUTH BAY WELDERS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/25/93 PAGE 0014 DATE 01/25/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00018 001-400-3104-4309 01005 $15.50 --MISC.—CHARGES—/DEC 92 12/31/92 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL ***********• ****+ *****•r• ****s**•w************* ****************w+r**** R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO _ SWEEPING SERV/DEC-92 —901 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************ $31.00 01265 43101 In $0.00---01/25/9a– In 00115 001-400-3103-4201 00446 $4.97.3.00 2901 00027 % 12/31792 ST MAINTENANCE CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT_ 60.00' *4.973.00 43102 01/29/93 " STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX DUE/OCT–DEC 92 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX DUE/OCT-DEC 92 R STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX DUE/OCT–DEC 92 _ _ R _ STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES'TAX DUE/OCT-DEC 92 00707 001-300-0000-3901 00067 12/31/92 R_ 00707 001-400-2101-4306 01314 12/31/92 POLICE 00707 110-400-3302-5402 00031 $26E1.00 /SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 12/31/92 PARKING ENF 00707 170-300-0000-3901 12/31/92 41, 00072 43103 $0.00 01/25/93 $7.00 00072 43103 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE s0. 00 01/25/93 i ;:' 654.00 00072 43103 /EQUIP–MORE THAN $500 *0.00 01/23/93°' 1.l 4_ J 00012 $137.00 /SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP *** VENDOR TOTAL****************s*************************************************** R CITY OF*TORRANCE 00841 001-400-2101-4251 00474 $466.00 $6.00 00072 _ $0.00 107886 00068 43103 01/25/93 43104 1.0„. AIH 1z 7.J L *** vl.fldf .2 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $6.00 $0.00 01/25/93 +., 41 ^7 R *** TRANSPORTATION CHARTER SERV. • 05018 145-400-3409-4201 0004.5 $45.7.00 . 9162 06318 43105 _ *0.00.: 01/25/93 BUS/SENIOR EXCURSION 9162 01/12/93 REC TRANSPTN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT VENDOR TOTAL *457.00 • A, 41 R 1..1 ..i;l i. .. .7. I 1 1 TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-202-0000-2021 '00340 $108.87 01275 43106 .••• 47 A11 ' — 12'/31 /92 . ,, ; , .. ; DISCOUNT OFFERED •. }''' DISCOUNTS OFFERED TRIANGLE HARDWARE '' 00123 001-202-0000-2022 00338 *108.87CR _ $0.00 01/25/93 01275 43106 .1'• 1 I ' 'I DISCOUNT TAKEN ' ' .. ' 12/31 /92 " ...' ' ' ' • .' ' ' - • ' /DISCOUNTS TAKEN - $0.00 01/25/93 .. '., r•.$ 11 . 1'11 .. .i I 1 . 11 • . '. 1.0„. AIH 1z 7.J L FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 14:09:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 1.' .q' • TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/25/93 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ $$ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00123 12/31/92 001-400-2201-4309 FIRE 01423 PAGE 0015 9, DATE 01/25/93 INV/REF PO M CHK M 00123 001-400-3103-4309 01464 12/31/92 ST MAINTENANCE R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 12/31/92 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 12/31/92 00123 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 12/31/92 _ TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 12/31/92 • TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 12/31/92 " R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 '1 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 12/31/92 11 14 35 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 00123 105-400-2601-4309 0086 12/31/92 STREET LIGHTING 9 001-400-3103-4311 00843 ST MAINTENANCE 001-400-3104-4309 01004 322. 92 AMOUNT,_UNENC DATE EXP /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 347. 20 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 310. 99 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $52.13 TRAFFIC SAFETY 001-400-4204-4309 02541 BLDG MAINT 01275 __ _ 43106 *0.00 01/25/93 01275 $0.00 01275 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $490.80 001-400205-4309 _.._ 00693 EOUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *13 55 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 001-400-4601-4305 01114 $55J2 COMM RESOURCES $0.00 01275._. $0.00 _7,\ 43106._ 01/25/93 43106 01/25/93 __43106 01/25/931-2' 14 3 r • 13 14 •;• 15 '4 104. 01275 _ 43106 _ 30.00 01/25/93 01275 . 43106 .... _ $0. 00 01/25/93 ]1 24 01275 _ 43106_ - ,2 *0.00 01/25/93 y: /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 001-4016101-4309 01368 3112 38 01275_-__..43106:` PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 01/25/93 I� $88.54 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01275 $0.00 00123 110-400-3302-4309 00887 12/31/92 PARKING ENF R 1 TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 MISC. CHARGES/DEC 92 12/31/92 *** VENDOR TOTAL *********** 160-400-3102-4309 00766 43106 01/25/93 $17.35 01275____43106._:" *0.00 01/25/93 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $68. 23 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ********************************************************* 3979.81 R WEST LA MUSIC SPEAKERS/COUNCIL CHAMBER 90630 *** VENDOR TOTAL 04991 001-400-1101-5401 00014 $422.18 01/14/93 CITY COUNCIL /EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 STEVE*WISNIEWSKI 411 MON EXP/NDV-DEC92/JAN 93 01364 001-400-2101-4316 01/11/93 POLICE $422.18 00982 $53.50 /TRAINING a• 47 11 01275 43106 •' 30.00 01/25/93-1- :51 I190630 06021 43107 $422.18 01/25/93 1,1 06133 43108 _ $0. 00 01/25/93 4! Ng. 51 71 7? ]4 /',1` r FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 14:09:49 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION koo. 1 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 01/25/93 PAGE 0016 DATE 01/25/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $53. 50 R MERRILL*WRIGHT ' 04118 001-400-1101-4201 00088 $3,007.0002174 43109 PROF SERV/OIL RECOVERY 01/12/93 CITY COUNCIL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 01/25/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL $3, 007. 00 231 a 11 .. ..., R YAESU U.S.A. 05024 001-400-2101-4309 00589 • $75.00 W815491 06127 43110 --- ----RADIO REPAIR/POLICE 15491 12/17/92 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 01/25/93 .' *** VENDOR TOTAL *** PAY CODE TOTAL • $75. 00 $128,492.40 *** TOTAL WARRANTS $541, 070. 17 _ . 19 e • Vt 3' 11 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED B% THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PA ES I TO it, INCLUSIVE. OF THE WARRANT—REGISTER-FOR. /04.5110---____- ARE ACCURATE FUND ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMUNT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE 4, TO TH BUDGET. BY 4ii?i,) 4, FIN I CE 13 ACTOR Li / DAT 45. 44 AR; • !67 j—, I •1 1 4.) FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 12:31:55 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/DEC 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/DEC 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/DEC 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/DEC 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/DEC 92 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/DEC 92 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/02/93 VND 11 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00026 001-400-1213-4190 00642 $94,684.16 01/27/93 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00643 $96,962.28CR 01/27/93 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT 00026 105-400-2601-4180 00196 $869.28 01/27/93 STREET LIGHTING /RETIREMENT 00026 109-400-3301-4180 00066 $150.13 01/27/93 VEH PKO DIST /RETIREMENT 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00200 $4,357.49 01/27/93 PARKING ENF /RETIREMENT 00026 115-400-8141-4180 00010 $69.93 01/27/93 CIP 89-141 /RETIREMENT PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS___ 00026 _ RETIREMENT/DEC 92 01/27/93 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/DEC PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/DEC PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/DEC PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/DEC H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/DEC H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/DEC H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT/DEC RETIREMENT SYS. 92 RETIREMENT SYS. 92 RETIREMENT SYS. 92 RETIREMENT SYS. 92 RETIREMENT SYS. 92 RETIREMENT SYS. 92 RETIREMENT SYS. 92 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/DEC 92 115-400-8144-4180 00010 CIP 90-144 1111.60 /RETIREMENT 00026 115-400-8178-4180 00010 $265.62 01/27/93 CIP 90-178 /RETIREMENT 00026 125-400-8513-4180 00010 $66.87 01/27/93 CIP 92-513 /RETIREMENT 00026 155-400-2102-4160 00171 $112.87 01/27/93 CROSSING GUARD /RETIREMENT 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00197 01/27/93 $974.54 SEWER/ST DRAIN /RETIREMENT 00026 160-400-8408-4190 00010 01/27/93 CIP 89-408 $69.93 /RETIREMENT 00026 170-400-2103-4180 00069 $5,667.99 01/27/93 SPEC INVESTGTNS /RETIREMENT 00026 705-400-1209-4180 00120 01/27/93 $259. 01 LIABILITY INS /RETIREMENT 00026 705-400-1217-4180 00122 01/27/93 $332.25 WORKERS COMP /RETIREMENT PAGE 0001 DATE 02/02/93 INV/REF PO N CHH N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $0. 00 $0.00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $O. 00 $O. 00 $O. 00 $O. 00 $O. 00 $O. 00 $O. 00 $O. 00 $O. 00 43111 02/02/93 43111 02/02/93 43111 02/02/93 43111 02/02/93 43111 02/02/93 43111 02/02/93 43111 02/02/93 43111 02/02/93 43111 02/02/93 43111 02/02/93 43111 02/02/93 43111 02/02/93 43111 02/02/93 43111 02/02/93 43111 02/02/93 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 12:31:55 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/02/93 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ***+r*************** ►********* *********** ****+r*»*****************a* H SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITATION COURT BAIL 00400 110-300-0000-3302 02/01/93 PAGE 0002 DATE 02/02/93 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $11,029.39 49592 $286.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************************+r***+r***** *** PAY CODE TOTAL***********************************************************+r****** BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA SAFEKEEPING FEE/DEC 92 5005 04677 01/21/93 001-400-1141-4201 00148 CITY TREASURER $286.00 *11,315.39 *250.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R .,JAMES*BERRY CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 09196 05034 110-300-0000-3302 01/26/93 *250. 00 49593 $50.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH%1-1 TO 1-14 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/1-1 TO 1-14 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 'PETTY CASH/1-1 TO 1-14 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/1-1 TO 1-14 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/1-1 TO 1-14 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/1-1 TO 1-14 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/1-1 TO 1-14 02016 01/14/93 02016 01/14/93 02016 01/14%93 02016 01/14/93 02016 01/14/93 02016 01/14/93 02016 01/14/93 001-400-1202-4305 FINANCE A 001-400-2101-4305 POLICE 001-400-2201-4305 FIRE 001-400-2201-4309 FIRE 001-400-4101-4305 PLANNING 001-400-6101-4309 PARKS 001-400-8616-4305 CIP 90-61 $50. 00 00467 $15.00 DMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 01922 $31.23 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00597 $15.68 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 01427 $7.27 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00666 $32. 48 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 01370 $24.01 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00004 $98. 19 6 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 05187 43112 $0.00 02/02/93 5005 03889 43116 $0. 00 02/02/93 1505196 05190 43117 $0. 00 02/02/93 03888 43118 $0. 00 02/02/93 03888 43118:'''" $0. 00 02/02/93 . 03888 43118 $0. 00 02/02/93 03888 43118 $0.00 02/02/93 03888 43118 $0. 00 02/02/93 03888 43118 $0. 00 02/02/93 03888 43118 *0.00 02/02/93 U 9 0 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 12:31:55 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/1-1 TO 1-14 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/1-1 TO 1-14• *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/02/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0003 DATE 02/02/93 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 02016 110-400-1204-4305 00001 40.50 01/14/93 FINANCE CASHIER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 02016 110-400-3302-4305 00954 *23.04 01/14/93 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R JEANNE*CARUSO REIMB MATERIALS/WINTER92 *** VENDOR TOTAL * * * 4247. 40 03293 001-400-2101-4316 00985 *162.22 01/20/93 POLICE /TRAINING R CENTER FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE TUITION/S. ENDOM VENDOR TOTAL 03027 001-400-2101-4312 02/01/93 POLICE *162. 22 02072 *226.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENT/JAN 93 09615 CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENT/JAN 93 09615 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENT/JAN 93 09615 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENT/JAN 93 09615 *** VENDOR TOTAL 03617 001-400-2101-4201 01189 01/18/93 POLICE 03617 00.1-400-2201-4201 00362 01/10/93 FIRE 03617 01/18/93 03617 01/18/93 001-400-2701-4201 00069 CIVIL DEFENSE 170-400-2103-4201 00145 SPEC INVESTGTNS *226. 00 *557. 42 3809615 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 03888 43118 *0. 00 02/02/93 03888 43118 *0. 00 02/02/93 06141 43119 40.00 02/02/93 05920 43120 *0. 00 02/02/93 00051 43:121 *0. 00 02/02/93 *181.48 3809615 00051 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 43121 *0.00 02/02/93 *375.93 3809615 00051 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0. 00 *181.48 3809615 00051 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 R TOM*CRAY MEALS/P. O. S. T. CLASS *** VENDOR TOTAL 00533 001-400-2101-4312 01/29/93 POLICE *1.296.31 02070 *72. 00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST R ELAINE C.*DOERFLING REIMB NOTARY EXPENSES *72. 00 02055 001-400-1121-4305 00232 465.20 01/14/93 CITY CLERK /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 43121 02/02/93 43121 02/02/93 05917 43122 *0. 00 02/02/93 03914 40.00 43123 02/02/93 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 12:31:55 .4 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ay V CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0004 FOR 02/02/93 DATE 02/02/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R ELAINE C.*DOERFLING 02055 001-400-1121-4315 00079 *45.00 03914 43123 REIMB DUES/NOTARY ASSOC 01/14/93 CITY CLERK /MEMBERSHIP *0.00 02/02/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************+r*****************+r***** * * * * * * *110. 20 R STEVE*ENDOM 01034 001-400-2101-4312 02073 *24.00 05919 43124 MEALS/P.O.S.T. CLASS 02/01/93 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *0.00 02/02/93 VENDOR TOTAL *24. 00 R CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH 04075 705-400-1217-4182 00270 *8.672.90 05539 43125 WORK COMP CLAIMS/JAN 93 01/13/93 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR $0.00 02/02/93 VENDOR TOTAL R HYATT REGENCY MONTEREY HOTEL/R. FERRIN TR413 *** VENDOR TOTAL * * * * * * *8,672.90 00559 001-400-1201-4316 00084 *217.80 01/31/93 CITY MANAGER /TRAINING $217.80 TR413 00413 43126 $0.00 02/02/93 COMMANDER MICHAEL*LAVIN 00792 001-400-2101-4316 00984 *78.58 06140 43127 RE/HB BOOKS/SPRING 93 02/01/93 POLICE %TRAINING $0.00 02/02/93 VENDOR TOTAL *78.58 R T0M*M0BERLV 04479 001-210-0000-2110 05205 *50.00 52517 05473 43128 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 32517 01128/93 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/02/93 R TOM*MOBERLY 04479 001-300-0000-3895 00054 *7.70CR 52517 05473 43128 ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES 52517 01/28/93 /ANIMAL TRAP FEE $0.00 02/02/93 VENDOR TOTAL $42.30 R VALERIE*MOHLER REIMS BOOKS/SPRING 93 00956 001-400-1202-4316 00442 $78.88 05643 43129 02/01/93 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING $0.00 02/02/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL***********1►************4******************************************* $78.88 R OLIVER, BARR & VOSE 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00762 *237.50 LEGAL SERVICE/DEC 92 01/28/93 420001 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 02175 *0.00 43130 02/02/93 t.a G.1 14' • • y 0 • • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 12:31:55 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION * * * R OLIVER, BARR & VOSE LEGAL SERVICE/DEC 92 VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/02/93 VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0005 DATE 02/02/93 INV/REF PO * CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00763 $9,595.75 01/28/93 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R ORANGE CO SHERIFF'S DEPT. TUITION/3 OFFICERS *** VENDOR TOTAL * * * 02954 001-400-2101-4312 01/28/93 POLICE $9,833.25 02071 *113.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST R PHOENIX GROUP OUT-OF-STATE CITES/NOV92 R PHOENIX GROUP OUT-OF-STATE CITES/DEC92 VENDOR TOTAL *113.00 02530 110-400-3302-4201 00379 $905.70 01/14/93 PARKING ENF /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 02530 110-400-3302-4201 00380 $1,095.60 01/14/93 PARKING ENF /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R DIANA J. *RIGGS CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 06566 *** VENDOR TOTAL 05032 110-300-0000-3302 01/26/93 *2,001.30 49595 $20.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING 02175 43130 $0.00 02/02/93 05918 43131 $0. 00 02/02/93 00063 43132 $0. 00 02/02/93 00063 43132 $0.00 02/02/93 3406566 05188 $0. 00 43133 02/02/93 $20.00 R ROLLINS HUDIG HALL OF CA, INC. 05035 705-400-1210-4201 00109 $500.00 573195 05544 43134` BOND RENEWAL/BRUTSCH 73195 01/26/93 AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/02/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $500.00 i R SYLVIA*ROOT SEC SERV/JAN 5, 1993 R SYLVIA*ROOT SEC SERV/JAN 19. 1993 *** VENDOR TOTAL 105 1019 04061 001-400-4102-4201 00393 01/11/93 PLANNING COMM 04061 001-400-4102-4201 00394 01/26/93 PLANNING COMM $282. 25 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $216.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT JANETTE*RUSS CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 05898 05033 110-300-0000-3302 01/26/93 $498.25 49594 $28.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING 105 05812 43135 $0.00. 02/02/93 1019 05814 43135 $0. 00 02/02/93 1505898 05189 $0.00 43136 02/02/93 4 r F I NANCE-SFA340 TIME 12:31:55 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/02/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ K ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0006 DATE 02/02/93 INV/REF PO N CHK $ AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL w*****w**w*****************.**********************w*******+r******waw $28. 00 R SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 04324 001-400-1203-4251 00160 $120.00 ADD'L TRIP REDUCTION FEE 01/27/93 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL $120. 00 R J. E.*TALLERICO 04247 001-400-1206-4201 01086 $20.00 COMPUTER SERV/DEC 92 191 12/17/92 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL *20. 00 R TRACY*YATES 04268 001-400-4202-4316. 00263 *110.09 REiMB BOOKS/SPRING 93 01/19193 PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL $110.09 *** PAY CODE TOTAL $24,772.48 *** TOTAL WARRANTS $36,087.87 05546 43137 $0.00 02/02/93 191 04040 43138 $0. 00 02/02/93 06044 43139 410.00 02/02/93 MFflkPY DERIIFY THAI THE DEMANDS OR CLAMS COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PA ES / TO __ INCLUSIVE. OF THE WARRANT REGISTER FOR /� 93'ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYhrLf11, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BU GET.d BY O - FINANCE DIRE R DATE •51J0Y- Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 23. 1993 9- 53 February 3, 1993 City Council Meeting of February 9, 1993 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Presentation of check from Kiwanis Club to HBCC Foundation (tree lot) Request from Chamber of Commerce re. bi-annual Fiesta de las Artes Kiwanis tree lot at Community Center - 1993 Award downtown maintenance contract Request for Council guidance and prioritization for the development of the Biltmore site park Amendment to ordinance prohibiting parking at walk streets on Hermosa Avenue Mid -Year Budget Review School District request for grounds maintenance provided by the City Public Hearing Appeal of Planning Commission denial of amendment to CUP at 1100 Strand (Scotty's) CUP amendment to modify conditions 4(e) and 10(a) of Reso. 91-5505 re. rear double door and removal of roof sign at 30 Pier Ave., Lighthouse Cafe March 9. 1993 Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Public Works Director Community Resources Dir. Public Works Director Finance Dir./City Mgr. Community Resources Dir. Planning Director Planning Director Report on publishing a tentative Council agenda in Easy Reader City Manager Greenbelt landscaping recommendation from Parks & Recreation Comm. Community Resources Dir. Effect of nonconforming ordinance on damaged structures Lease renewal for Beach Cities Coalition for Drug Free Youth Report on noise ordinance and enforcement Public Hearing Text amendment to sign ordinance Text amendment to adopt Congestion Management Plan (CMP)/Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordinance RUDAT implementation committee report March 23. 1993 South School conceptual design Approval of litigation defense firm list Approve call for bids for Greenbelt tree planting Public Hearing Final adoption of the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element and Household Hazardous Waste Element in compliance with the State mandated AB939 Adoption of Landscape Conservation Ordinance in compliance with state law April 13. 1993 April 27, 1993 May 11. 1993 Lease renewal for South Bay Free Clinic (Room 7) Lease renewal for Project Touch (Rooms 3 and 11) Planning Director Community Resources Dir. Public Safety Director Planning Director Planning Director Chamber of Commerce Community Resources Dir. Risk Manager Public Works Director Building Director Planning Director Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. May 23. 1993 June 8. 1993 Lease renewal for L.A. County Bar Association (Dispute Resolution Service) Community Resources Dir. June 22, 1993 July 13, 1993 July 27, 1993 August 10, 1993 Lease renewal for Hope Chapel (Rooms 5 and 6A) Community Resources Dir. August 24, 1993 September 14, 1993 Lease renewal for Association for Retarded Citizens Community Resources Dir. Lease renewal for Easter Seal Society Community Resources Dir. Lease renewal for South Bay Center for Counseling Community Resources Dir. September 28, 1993 December , 1993 Lease renewal for Project Touch (Room C) Community Resources Dir. •*************************************************************es# UPCOMING ITEMS NOT YET CALENDARED Initiated by Party Date Staff Caltrans utility mainten- ance agreement Public Works Dir. Staff Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Council 5/8/90 Re. oil project CUP - define "temporary" as it relates to Public Works Dir. height of project (needs text amendment) Council 6/6/91 Review Bldg/Zoning Code changes to improve liveability Council 5/26/92 Revision of HBMC provisions pertaining to construction of public street improve- ments (Public hearing) Staff Staff Staff Staff WP/FUTURE Request for approval of the Tenant/Users Liability Insur- ance Program (TULIP) and establishment of an admin- istrative fee for processing TULIP applications Final public hearing for Land Use Element Payroll software selection Staff recommendation on expenditure of PERS refund Firefighters' MOU Approval Report on beach foot patrol Extension of Auditors contract Planning Director Planning Director Public Works Dir. Personnel Director Planning Director Finance Director Finance Director Negotiating team Public Safety Dir. Finance Director TREASURER'S REPORT - DECEMBER 1992 FUND GENERAL 12/1/92 CASH ADJUSTMENTS WARRANTS ADJUSTMENTS 12/31/92 NUMBER ACCOUNT BALANCE BALANCE 001 GENERAL 51,740,694.40 51,750,338.68 5216,502.35 (1806,744.99) (5112,413.93) 52,788,376.51 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT 51,360,467.62 572,822.89 55,621.42 (554,143.35) (52,530.53) 51,382,238.05 109 VEHICLE PARKING DIST. 5273,227.60 516,369.31 51,128.97 (57,124.09) (533,204.95) 5250,396.84 110 PARKING 543,321.91 5101,603.93 5764.00 (560,788.12) (5108,902.72) (524,001.00) 115 STATE GAS TAX 51,577,561.69 549,931.21 $6,518.44 (58,702.12) (520,166.67) 51,605,142.55 120 COUNTY GAS TAX 58,286.05 50.00 534.24 50.00 10.00 58,320.29 125 PARK REC.FAC.TAX 5339,925.07 S10,396.00 51,404.56 ($4,462.74) 50.00 5347,262.89 126 RAILROAD RT.OF WAY 51,348,994.94 573,969.97 $0.00 50.00 50.00 51,422,964.91 127 6% UTILITY USERS TAX 5337,196.78 599,306.43 51,393.29 50.00 (5118,461.50) 5319,435.00 145 PROPOSITION A FUND (525,034.18) 517,524.00 50.00 ($2,061.84) 50.00 ($9,572.02) 146 PROPOSITION C FUND 5177,487.16 50.00 5733.37 (51,957.26) 50.00 S176,263.27 150 GRANT FUND 5185,818.16 55,065.46 50.00 ($1,309.18) $0.00 5189,574.44 155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT 551,016.90 521,838.22 5210.80 (55,014.88) (5747.75) 567,303.29 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE 52,431,027.63 5505.28 576,711.61 (514,899.33) (51,195.01) 52,492,150.18 170 POLICE ASSET SEIZURE 51,316,339.53 514,667.50 55,471.08 (593,724.14) (56,262.50) 51,236,491.47 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 5534,445.27 $4,195.05 52,208.31 50.00 (5833.33) 5540,015.30 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 705 SELF INSURANCE FUND 5322,365.95 511,087.83 586,292.00 (592,497.50) ($44.06) 5327,204.22 512,023,142.48 52,249,621.76 5404,994.44 (51,153,429.54) (5404,762.95) 513,119,566.19 TRUST ACCOUNTS BALANCE RECEIVED PAID BALANCE 52,938.70 5650,184.38 5649,448.02 $3,675.06 GENERAL 5482,586.26 511,432,500.00 PAYROLL 55,266.76 INACTIVE DEPOSIT 51,267,503.34 5539,856.89 INACTIVE DEPOSIT HELD BY FISCAL AGENT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY 5191,933.71 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE OUTSTANDING CHECKS INACTIVE DEPOSIT GARY L. BRUTSCH, C Y TREASURER JANUARY 21, 199 5487,853.02 564,615.11 5423,237.91 512,700,003.34 BALANCE 513,123,241.25 ld February 2, 1993 Honorable Mayor City Council Meeting and Members of the of February 9, 1993 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMISA BEACH Attached is report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of January 1993. This is the most current available investment information. Respectfully submitted, Gary L. City Treasurer NOTED: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager j INVESTMENT REPORT - JANUARY 1993 DATE OF DATE OF ASKING MARKET INSTITUTION TOTAL INVESTMENT MATURITY PRICE VALUE INTEREST LAIF BALANCE 1/1/93 S7,940,000.00 Investment 400,000.00 01/14/93 Maturity 250,000.00 BALANCE 1/31/93 $8,590,000.00 LACPIF Railroad Right -of -Way Account BALANCE 1/1/93 $1,267,503.34 Investment 117,500.07 01/20/93 BALANCE 1/31/93 $1,385,003.41 CORPORATE NOTES: Ford Motor Credit Co. Investment U.S. TREASURY BOND Investment Investment Investment INVESTMENT TOTAL SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST 01/20/93 4.659% 5.39% $500,000.00 5/19/88 5/20/93 $ 500,000.00 $ 502,455.00 9.10% $996,875.00 5/14/90 2/15/93 $ 996,875.00 $1,005,940.00 8.375% $1,005,937.50 9/14/90 6/30/94 $1,005,937.50 $1,061,560.00 8.50% $989,687.50 12/03/92 11/30/97 $ 989,687.50 S 997,810.00 6.24% S13,467,503.41 BALANCE 12/1/92 $527,935.81 Adjustment 54.91 11/30/92 BALANCE 12/31/92 $527,990.72 8.402 CHICAGO TITLE BALANCE 08/01/92 511,921.08 Adjustment 163.44 12/31/92 BALANCE 12/31/92 TRUSTEE TOTAL GRAND TOTAL Respectfully Submitted, 512,084.52 5540,075.24 514,007,578.65 __ fae,1-4 Gary L. Brutsch City Treasurer Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council �-�- 93— 5596 January 26, 1993 Regular Meeting of February 9, 1993 SUBJECT: LAND USE ANALYSIS PROGRAM RESOLUTION LOCATION: CITYWIDE INITIATED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PURPOSE: ADOPTION OF LAND USE ANALYSIS PROGRAM RESOLUTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY 1992 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Staff Recommendation To adopt the attached Land Use Analysis Program resolution. Background In January 1993, a memo was sent by the Los Angeles County - Transportation Commission (LACTC) to all local jurisdictions in Los Angeles County regarding the Land Use Analysis Program for the County's Congestion Management Program (CMP). This Land Use Analysis Program component requires local jurisdictions to amend their environmental review process for projects requiring environmental impact reports (EIRs) in order to consider potential project impacts on the regional transportation system. Analysis The CMP for Los Angeles County was adopted by the LACTC in November 1992. The CMP is a state -mandated program intended as the analytical basis for transportation decisions made through the State Transportation Improvement Program process. The requirements for the CMP became effective with voter approvalof Proposition 111 in June 1990. Pursuant to AB 152, the existing LACTC and Southern California Rapid Transit District will be merged into the new Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). The new MTA will assume responsibility for all programs and services currently provided by LACTC, including implementation and administration of the CMP. While the MTA has the primary implementation responsibility for CMP implementation, local jurisdictions have the following implementation responsibilities: 1. Adopting and implementing a Land Use Analysis Program to analyze the impacts of land use decisions. 2. Adopting and implementing a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordinance. - 1 - If 3. Monitoring the attainment of level of service (LOS) and the collection of traffic data for CMP routes. 4. Submitting data from municipal transit operators for CMP transit monitoring by MTA. Each local jurisdiction is responsible for adopting and implementing a Land Use Analysis Program to ensure that the potential impacts of new development projects on the regional transportation system receive adequate consideration in the local land use approval process. The Land Use Analysis Program is designed to build on the existing California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) procedural guidelines by identifying the potential significant impacts in an EIR. This program is intended as an information sharing program to improve communication between jurisdictions regarding the impact of new development on the CMP transportation system. All development projects required to prepare an EIR based on local determination are subject to the adopted CMP Land Use Analysis Program as a local development entitlement requirement. Specifically, the Land Use Analysis Program requires the lead agency to identify and consult with all regional and municipal fixed -route transit operators providing service to the project, including MTA. Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the lead agency must send a copy of the project Notice of Preparation (NOP) to MTA and all affected transit operators. The NOP transmittal is the only notification requirement of the Land Use Analysis Program. This requirement is merely intended to solicit comments from these agencies. It would not confer to MTA and the affected transit agencies the status of "responsible agency" as defined under CEQA, since this requirement does not convey any discretionary approval authority to these agencies. The project EIRs shall incorporate a CMP Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) as a compliance requirement for the Land Use Analysis Program. Phased development projects, or development projects requiring subsequent approvals, need not repeat this process as long as no significant changes are made to the project. Exemptions to the CMP TIA requirements include the following: 1. Projects that entered into a development agreement with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989. Development agreements are obligations entered into on the part of a developer and a jurisdiction as specified under Section 65864 of the California Government Code. 2. Traffic generated by low and very low income housing. Definitions of low and very low income housing are provided by the California Department of Housing and Community Development as follows: Low Income: Equal to or less than 80% of the median county income, with adjustments for family size. Very Low Income: Equal to or less than 50% of the median county income, with adjustments for family size. 3. High Density residential developments located within one-quarter mile of a fixed rail passenger station. State statute defines "high density" as equal to or greater than 120% of the maximum residential density allowed under the City's General Plan and zoning ordinance. 4. Mixed use developments located within one-quarter mile of a fixed rail passenger station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high density residential housing, as determined by the City. Mixed use development is defined by State statute as development which integrates compatible commercial or retail uses, or both, with residential uses, and which, due to the proximity of job locations, shopping opportunities, and residences, will minimize new trip generation. 5. Projects for which a NOP was prepared and distributed pursuant to CEQA prior to the local jurisdiction's adoption of the Land Use Analysis Program. The geographic area examined in the TIA must, at a minimum, include the following: 1. All CMP arterial monitoring intersections where the proposed project will add 50 or more trips during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours. 2. Mainline freeway monitoring locations where the project will add 150 or more trips, in either direction, during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours. 3. CALTRANS must also be consulted through the NOP process to identify other specific locations to be analyzed on the State highway system. If, based on these criteria, the TIA identifies no facilities for study, no further traffic analysis is required. The specific procedures for documenting existing traffic conditions, project traffic generation, trip distribution, impact analysis, and mitigation measures is outlined in Appendix D of the CMP. Each local jurisdiction is responsible for adopting and implementing a Land Use Analysis Program that meets the minimum standards identified above by April 1, 1993. The method by which local jurisdictions incorporate and implement the Land Use Analysis Program is left to the discretion of the local jurisdiction. Adoption of the attached resolution is considered an acceptable method by the CMP. The MTA is required to assess the adequacy of local Land Use Analysis Programs to determine their conformance with CMP requirements. This determination of adequacy is based on submission by April 1, 1993 of documentation that verifies the formal incorporation of a Land Use Analysis Program into the local jurisdiction's land use entitlement process that contains TIA guidelines consistent with those outlined in Appendix D of the CMP. Impact This Land Use Analysis Program requirement of the CMP would have little impact on the City's environmental review process, primarily because very few projects in the City require an EIR and the only CMP arterial monitoring intersection located within the City is where Pacific Coast Highway crosses Artesia Boulevard/Gould Avenue. Therefore, the only new requirements for a project EIR would be: (1) send a copy of the NOP to MTA and all affected transit operators; and (2) include a transportation impact analysis, consistent with the TIA guidelines, of the Pacific Coast Highway/Artesia Boulevard intersection in the EIR, regardless of project location. These new requirements would not alter the City's role as lead agency under CEQA; the decision of whether an EIR must be prepared for a project would still be based on local determination. CONC Mic 'a=- Schubach Planning Director �� Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager 445',5Z%- Crai halfa} Adv ced Planner Attachments 1. Land Use Analysis Program resolution p/ccsrtia 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A LAND USE ANALYSIS PROGRAM THAT INCORPORATES A TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS INTO THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURES IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE 1992 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California held a meeting on this matter and made the following findings: A. The Legislature of the State of California has found that the lack of an integrated transportation system and the increase in the number of vehicles are causing traffic congestion that each day results in hundreds of thousands of hours lost in traffic, tons of pollutants released into the air and millions of dollars of added costs to the motoring public; and B. The Legislature has adopted legislation requiring the preparation and implementation of a Congestion Management Program ("CMP") by county transportation commissions or other public agencies of every county that includes an urbanized area; and C. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("MTA") is responsible for the preparation of the CMP for Los Angeles County ("County"); and D. The CMP requires all local jurisdictions to adopt a Land Use Analysis Program by April 1, 1993 to analyze the potential impacts of local land use decisions on the regional 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 transportation system, including an estimate of the cost of mitigating associated impacts, which shall rely on the procedural guidelines already established by the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"); and E. The CMP states that the Land Use Analysis Program requirement shall only apply to development projects that must prepare an environmental impact report ("EIR"), pursuant to a determination by the local jurisdiction, and that the Land Use Analysis Program shall incorporate into the EIR a Transportation Impact Analysis ("TIA") that meets the specific guidelines contained in Appendix D of the CMP; and F. MTA must determine annually whether the County and local jurisdictions within the County are conforming to the CMP, including the requirement for the incorporation of a Land Use Analysis Program, which includes the TIA requirements, into the local environmental review process; and G. This resolution is intended to comply with the CMP requirement for a.local Land Use Analysis Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve the following Land Use Analysis Program to be incorporated into the City's environmental review procedures: SECTION I Purpose and Objectives The purpose of this Land Use Analysis Program is to ensure that the City considers potential regional transportation impacts of new development projects through the land use approval process. The Land Use Analysis Program is designed to build on the existing California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") procedural guidelines by identifying the impact of new developments on the regional highway system in an environmental impact report ("EIR"). This program is intended as an information sharing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 program to improve communication between jurisdictions regarding the impact of new development on the CMP transportation system. Consistent with CMP statute, this Land Use Analysis Program has the following objectives: 1. Reaffirming the City's responsibility as "lead agency" as defined by CEQA in local land use approval decisions. 2. Establishing a program which can be integrated into the City's existing environmental review procedures. 3. Promoting increased inter -jurisdictional coordination in evaluating and mitigating land use impacts. 4. Encouraging consistent analysis of regional impacts and dissemination of this information through the CEQA process. SECTION II Projects Subject to the Land Use Analysis Program All development projects which the City determines are required under CEQA to prepare an EIR shall be subject to the Land Use Analysis Program as a local development entitlement requirement. The Land Use Analysis Program requires the City as "lead agency" to identify and consult with all regional and municipal fixed -route transit operators providing service to the project. Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the City shall send a copy of the project Notice of Preparation ("NOP") to MTA and all affected transit operators in order to solicit comments on the project's potential impacts on the CMP transportation system. As a condition of project approval, the project EIRs shall incorporate a CMP Transportation Impact Analysis (."TIA") as a compliance requirement for the Land Use Analysis Program. Exemptions to the TIA requirements include the following: 1. Projects that entered into a development agreement with the City prior to July 10, 1989. Development agreements are obligations entered into on the part of a developer and a jurisdiction as specified under Section 65864 of the California Government Code. 2. Traffic generated by low and very low income housing. Definitions of low and very low income housing are provided by the California Department of Housing and Community Development as follows: Low Income: equal to or less than 80% of the median county income, with adjustments for family size. Very Low Income: equal to or less than 50% of the median county income, with adjustments for fa;nily size. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. High density residential developments located within one-quarter mile of a fixed rail passenger station, if any. State statute defines "high density" as equal to or greater than 120% of the maximum residential density allowed under the City's General Plan and zoning ordinance. 4. Mixed use developments located within one-quarter mile of a fixed rail passenger station, if any, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high density residential housing, as determined by the City. Mixed use development is defined by State statute as development which integrates compatible commercial or retail uses, or both, with residential uses, and which, due to the proximity of job locations, shopping opportunities, and residences, will minimize new trip generation. 5. Projects for which a NOP was prepared and distributed pursuant to CEQA prior to the local jurisdiction's adoption of the Land Use Analysis Program. Phased development projects, or development projects requiring subsequent approvals, need not repeat this process as long as no significant changes are to the project, subject to the determination of the City. SECTION III Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Procedures The provisions of the Land Use Analysis Program and TIA requirements shall only apply to those projects which require the preparation of an EIR, as determined by the City in accordance with the CEQA guidelines. This analysis shall be documented within the project EIR. The specific TIA guidelines are contained in Appendix D of the CMP, which are generally summarized as follows: 1. The City, acting as the lead agency under CEQA makes a determination that an EIR is necessary for a proposed project and notifies the Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("MTA") through the NOP process. In addition, area transit operators are consulted regarding potential project impacts to the transit system. 2. Existing traffic volumes and levels of service ("LOS") shall be documented in the EIR. 3. Traffic generation estimates shall be performed, conforming to the procedures of the current edition of Trip Generation by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. Trip distribution by manual/assignment shall be made using the generalized trip distribution factors contained in Appendix D of the CMP. 5. An analysis of the project's potential traffic impacts shall be conducted utilizing the guidelines contained in Appendix D of the CMP. 6. Significant impacts that may occur as a result of the project shall be determined. For the purposes of the CMP, a significant impact would occur if the proposed project could increase traffic demand on Pacific Coast Highway by 2% of capacity that would create a LOS of . F or worsen an existing LOS of F. 7. Measures which would mitigate significant impacts identified by the TIA shall be investigated. Such mitigation measures must consider significant impacts of the proposed project on neighboring jurisdictions. 8. Cost estimates, including the fair share costs --to mitigate significant impacts of the proposed project, shall be developed, indicating the responsible agency in charge of implementing each mitigation measure. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of February, 1993. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: p/ccrstia CITY CLERK C t/ CITY ATTORNEY • �M February 1, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: NOTICE TO INVITE SEALED BIDS INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC NOTICING February 9, 1993 Recommendation Approve by minute order the attached notice .to invite bids, and bid submittal form. Background At the City Council meeting of January 26, 1993, the City Council opted to rebid the 300 foot public noticing required for various_ discretionary application submittals to the Planning Commission and to the City Council on appeal. Analysis The attached bid invitation and submittal form is essentially what has been used in the past, except the proviso to require property owner's monthly update has been added. Without requiring the updated property owners' list, the quality of service would substantially decline from the past contractor's service. Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Attachments 1. Notice to invite bids 2. Bid submittal form 3. Contractor's resignation letter - 1 - Respgctfully submitted, 9,3 ichael Schubach Planning Director p/ccsrbid ig CITY OP HERMOSA BEACH NOTICE TO INVITE BIDS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed proposals for providing the City with the 300' radius ownership and occupant lists will be received at the office of the City Clerk, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, until Thursday, February 25, 1993 at 2:00 P.M. At which time the bids will be publicly opened and read aloud. 1. Description - To provide the required 300' radius public noticing for all applications for Planning Commission and City Council review of private projects. Number of applications is unknown. This provision involves the following: a) Preparation of ownership and occupant list of all properties within 300' radius of subject property.. b) Preparation of radius maps with numbered parcels corresponding to ownership occupant list. c) Field inspection of businesses, apartments, and condominium projects, or other addresses as needed to ensure proper mailing. d) Copying and mailing the City prepared public notice to owners and occupants on said list. e) Signing affidavit that verifies mailings were done. f) A minimum of monthly updated property owners lists available at all times. 2. Period - For all applications scheduled for public hearing between March 1, 1993 to June 30, 1993 that are subject to 300' radius noticing requirement. If the City is satisfied with. the service being provided at the end of this period, the contract will be extended from July 1, 1993 for an indefinite period therefrom, provided the prices remain the same or by mutual agreement. 3. Submit bid as a fixed amount for each application, incorporating costs for postage and xeroxing. 4. Submit separate bid for mailing of second notices for second public hearing before City Council. City Council notification is necessary when a Planning Commission decision is appealed, or second public hearing required by ordinance and would require reproduction of the list, and postage. ,Bids shall be enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed to: City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, and shall be identified on the lower left corner of the envelop: SEALED BID FOR 300' RADIUS NOTICING. 1 The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive any irregularities in a bid, and to award the sale to the supplier providing the product best meeting the City's needs. The bids must guarantee service delivery on March 1, 1993. The cost of workers' compensation insurance shall be borne by the bidder. Complete bid sheet may be obtained in Planning Department in the City of Hermosa Beach. Michael Schubach Planning Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0242 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STATE OF CALIFORNIA BID FOR 300' RADIUS NOTICING 3/1/93-6/30/93 Bidder's Name -.Address Telephone Number ITEM NO. ITEM QUANTITY UNIT OF MEASURE UNIT PRICE (IN FIGURES) 1. 300' Radius Noticing Approx. Each to Planning Commission 24 Project $ 2. 300' Radius Noticing Approx. Each to City Council 5 Project $ 1. AMOUNT IN WORDS: 2. AMOUNT IN WORDS: IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN FIGURES AND WORDS, THE PRICE IN WORDS SHALL PREVAIL. RETURN TO: The office of the City Clerk 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Sealed bids will be received at the office of the City Clerk until Thursday, February 25, 1993 at 2:00 p.m. "Sealed Bid for 300' Radius Noticing" should be marked on the lower left corner of the envelope. C r Mon291 Sag VIc39g mg maid MuENc]2\Ton gcmgo119 1559-E Pacific Cst. Hwy. #168 Hermosa Beach CA 90254 310/546-6498 Michael Schubach do City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach CA 90254 Dear Mike: January 27, 1993 As specified in my contract with the City of Hermosa Beach, it was my understanding that I, as a contractor to the the City, I had the right to increase my fee to the satisfaction of myself and the City. After our discussion of the fact that the City currently has other contract vendors using City equipment, I made what I considered a very generous offer to the City toward this end. The Council's subsequent conversation resulted in negative terms like "feather -bedding", which I interpret as an attack on my character, particularly in light the other vendors that enjoy the same privledges I was requesting. This letter shall serve as a 30 Day Notice to Terminate my contract for notification services. I have enjoyed working with you and your staff. Sincerely, Cathy chulte South A: ay Noticing and Subdivision Consulting cc: City Council City Manager RECEIVED JAN 2 7 1993 PLANNING DEPT. o-4 February 1, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 9, 1993 COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE RATES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council approve the annual lease rates as listed in the analysis below for fiscal years 1993-94, 1994-95 and 1995-96 for Community Center rooms. BACKGROUND Per the deed restrictions on the use of the Community Center property, non-profit agencies are the only groups permitted as tenants in the Center. The Commission is charged with setting these rates and has typically done so in 3 -year increments. In the past three (3) fiscal years, lease rates have been set as follows: July 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991: July 1, 1991 through June 30, 1992: July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1993: $.77 sq. ft. $.80 sq. ft. $.84 sq. ft. Recommendations for various rates have been calculated in the past by researching what the "going rate" is for commercial buildings (more specifically, older commercial buildings) in the area and by reducing these rates by 25-30 percent to account for the "non-profit" status. ANALYSIS The Commission recommends approval of the rates listed below: July 1, 1993 through June 30, 1994: July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995: July 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996: $.87 sq. ft. $.90 sq. ft. $.93 sq. ft. The "low end" going rate for commercial buildings appears to be at approximately $1.25 sq. ft. at this time. Using a 30 percent formula to discount our rate would make our 1993-94 lease rate $.87 sq. ft. Staff has difficulty determining comparable rates for surrounding communities due to the fact that most do not lease to non-profit agencies. Staff did determine that one Redondo Beach agency paid a lease rate of $.70 per square foot at the Knob Hill Community Resources Center in Redondo Beach which would make our rates comparably higher. - 1 - 1h Another appropriate measure for the increase would be the Consumer Price Index figure which has risen by 3.3 percent as of November, 1992 which would further support the $.87 sq. ft. rate. In projecting approximate 3 percent hikes in the CPI over the next two years, it would seem equitable to raise lease rates accordingly. Staff has given some consideration to the fact that the recession has impacted non-profit agencies with decreases in donations and grant funds. As such, the Commisision may consider a review of these recommended rates on an annual basis to insure that they do not exceed equitable levels. The City benefits greatly from the tenancy of the social service agencies in the Community Center. They not only provide vital social services to those in need but they also provide a vehicle for our residents to participate positively in their community as volunteers. Attached you will find a list of these agencies and the years they have been housed in the Center. Other alternatives available to the Council include: 1) Do not raise the lease rates. 2) Reduce/increase recommended lease rates. 3) Recommend that the lease rates be tied to the CPI on an annual basis. 4) Request more information. FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated annual revenues from $110,000 - 120,000. Cour Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Res •=_ ully submitted, Ma ooney, Director Co unity Resources Dept. Noted for fiscal impact:. c. • Viki Copeland Finance Director LESSEE ASSOC. FOR RETARDED CITIZENS DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES COMMUNITY CENTER LEASES ROOM # SQUARE FOOTAGE PAYMENT YEARS IN CC 1,2,15 2360 $1,982 6 6B 200 $ 168 5 EASTER SEALS SOCIETY 14,16,17 2760 $2,318 HOPE CHAPEL 5,6A,13 2212 $1,858 PROJECT TOUCH C,3,11 1241 $1,042 SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC 7 1100 $ 924 SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. 9 419 $ 352 BEACH CITIES COALITION 4 798 $ 670 14 7 13 8/r1O. 2 January 27, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of the"•City Council Regular Meeting of February 9, 1992 ASSOCIATION OF VOLLEYBALL PROFESSIONALS 2 -MAN PRO BEACH VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff that Council approve the request from the AVP (Association of Volleyball Professionals) to hold the 2 -man Pro Beach Volleyball Tournament on the Hermosa Beach Pier courts on August 27, 28 and 29, 1993 with a daily permit fee of $3,254 (total anticipated revenues of $23,770) and to authorize the Mayor to sign the attached contract that provides the requirements and terms of the agreement between the City and the AVP. It is further recommended by the Commission that the Council deny the request from the AVP to charge admission for some of the seats at the tournament. BACKGROUND Hermosa Beach has hosted the Men's Professional Volleyball event for nine (9) years. The AVP has been responsible for event operations for the past six (6) years. The primary event sponsor will be Miller Lite as has been the case in previous years. The City's commercial event ordinance establishes a minimum event fee of $1,627 per day negotiable upward. For the past two (2) years, in response to the impact of this event and the commercial use of the beach, Council voted to charge the AVP double the daily permit fee each day. The Commission recommended approval of the event at the same fee level (double the daily fee) for the 1993 tournament but voted to deny the request to charge admission as submitted by the AVP (see attached minutes). ANALYSIS TOURNAMENT APPROVAL The USA Championships have become an annual tradition in Hermosa Beach. As a sporting event attracting national attention (for the past two years it has been televised on NBC), the tournament draws an estimated 15,000 spectators to Hermosa Beach over the three day event. In short, the City becomes a staging area for one of the top professional volleyball events in the world. The AVP has always produced well -organized, safe events in Hermosa Beach and has cooperated in meeting all of the terms of 1 1i the City's contractual agreements in addition to abiding by requests from staff as required. Each year, with pre and post event meetings, the staff and AVP have been able to refine the event so that it operates more efficiently each time around. The site plan places the majority of equipment and all of the grand stands around the Center Court area. Bleacher stacks are given a final inspection by City Building Department Inspectors prior to the event. Pre -event meetings are conducted by the Police Department staff and AVP security to review all safety measures and security concerns. Last year's event was met with no negative incidents. Staff sees that minor improvements need to be made with the required shuttle bus service in terms of signage and advertising as this service has been under-utilized in the past years (the shuttle bus transports spectators from Mira Costa High School parking lots to the staging area). This has been addressed with changes in the attached contract. Last year also saw the first of an annual trophy presentation on behalf of the City and the contract requests the same type of event for 1993. The scheduling of the 1993 tournament is unfortunately back-to-back with the Labor Day Fiesta (see attached calendar). This is coincidental in that the USA Championships are always held on the last weekend in August and of course the Fiesta dates change each year as well with the holiday. This will not occur in 1994 as the yearly calendar shifts. ADMISSION The AVP submitted a request and a budget to charge admission for priority seating at the tournament (attached). The proposal would call for 500 seats to be sold at a projected net revenue of $920 to the City. While some Commissioners were inclined to recommend denying this request on face value (that is they were opposed to the concept of charging admission for an event on a public beach), others felt that the proposed financial benefit to the City was not sufficient enough to begin considering such a request. As Council will recall, a similar request was made last year by the AVP which the Council voted to deny. Despite approvals from some tournament sites, the AVP did not implement admission charges on any other local public beaches in 1992. It is noteworthy that over the past year, the AVP gained approval from the Coastal Commission to charge admission for seats as long as they allowed'for 75% of the seats to be free of charge (policy attached), however, the decision to do so rests entirely with the City. Projected fiscal impact: Permit fees: $9,762.00 Police fees: 9,487.00 Film Permit: 1,751.50 Co-sponsor Fees: 500.00 Parking 1,845.00 Amplified Sound 38.00 Banner Permit: 387.00 Total $23,770.50 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Contract 2. Commission minutes 3. AVP application and site plan 4. Calendar of scheduled events 5. Request from AVP to charge admission Co cur: Q Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Respe ully submitted, Mar oney, Director Counity Resources Dept. Viki Copeland Finance Director CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT(S) CONTRACT This contract is entered into on February 9, 1993, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between the ASSOCIATION OF VOLLEYBALL PROFESSIONALS (AVP), and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY), with regard to the Association of Volleyball Professionals' Men's U.S.A. Championships on August 27, 28, & 29, 1993. FEES Event fee shall be $9,762. The $500 deposit will be applied toward the $9,762 permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the CITY. All predetermined costs fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the Tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by the CITY on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the CITY. SECURITY The CITY of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the Tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one representative of AVP. AVP shall provide no less than ten security officers. Said officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other Tournament staff. A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the Tournament for a pre -event briefing. The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of the CITY'S alcohol ordinance. The CITY of Hermosa Beach shall provide Officers for the event as follows for each day of Tournament, 10:00 AM - 6:00 PM: 1 Sergeant 2 Officers or as many officers as deemed necessary by Public Safety Director. Cost of officers shall be assumed by AVP. CLEAN-UP AVP shall provide a professional maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the Tournament: . The Beach and Strand, from 8th Street to 15th Street . Pier Avenue, from Strand to Monterey Avenue The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the trash collected outside the CITY each day of the Tournament. All maintenance work is to be concluded by 8:00 PM each evening. AVP shall provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: . Beach (impacted area) . Strand (impacted area) . Hermosa Valley Greenbelt (impacted area) or additional trash receptacles as needed. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES AVP shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of Tournament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. INSURANCE Thirty (30) days prior to the Event, AVP shall provide the CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. AVP insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not. be required to contribute. Said insurances shall not be cancelled or terminated without at least ten (10) days written notice to the CITY. AVP agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of the event promotion firm/sponsor its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. • CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors; with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to event. ADVERTISING Signage regarding the CITY'S alcohol ordinance shall be required by AVP. CITY staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for postings. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH shall permit two street banners to be posted for Tournament. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of AVP. CITY shall permit AVP to display two large replicas of their product. CITY staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. AVP shall be required to make announcements informing spectators __ of the CITY'S alcoholic beverage ordinance as deemed necessary by Hermosa Beach Police. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by AVP to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of event promotion firm/sponsor. PARKING AVP shall be required to make announcements indicating: 1) where there is free parking; and, 2) that the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. AVP shall provide a shuttle bus service from a major satellite. point(s) on the outskirts of or outside of Hermosa Beach. AVP shall provide directional signs and advertisement which shall be approved in advance by the CITY. SPECIAL EVENTS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events requested to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. AVP shall schedule the annual beauty contest no later than noon on Saturday, August 28th. Said competition will take place on the south side of the Pier and will not impede lifeguard activity. The CITY will have final approval of event emcee. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. If AVP desires any County services, they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by AVP. The CITY shall allow access to Tournament site for setup seventy-two (72) hours prior to Tournament. The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue (Beach Drive to the Strand) for Tournament staff and film equipment parking. At no time may event/promotion firm block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at anytime by the CITY. The CITY shall allow AVP the opportunity to sell official concession items pursuant to certain conditions: No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted; and, All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID CONTRACT. MISCELLANEOUS AVP RESPONSIBILITIES AVP shall provide as many portable port -a -johns as determined necessary by CITY staff. AVP shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. AVP shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and personnel necessary for conducting such a Tournament. AVP shall take necessary steps to encourage participants and require sponsors to utilize recycling bins for appropriate materials. AVP shall make arrangements for such bins. Event shall be conducted in compliance with CITY of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances on file at the Department of Community Resources. At the CITY'S option, AVP is required to display and permit CITY representatives to present a perpetual trophy and individual trophies to Tournament winners. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH By ATTEST: CITY CLERK MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES DIRECTOR ASSN. OF VOLLEYBALL PROFESSIONALS PRESIDENT DATE: PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF THURSDAY, JANUARY 21, 1993 MEETING ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Peirce, Commissioners Blaco, Crecy, McCurdy, Reviczky Staff: Esslinger, Rooney APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 10, 1992 Motion: "To approve as submitted." Reviczky/Perice All Ayes Abstain: Crecy 'STREET HOCKEY FACILITY Brian Garland of California Street Hockey Association gave a presentation on bringing hockey facilities to Hermosa Beach. PUBLIC COMMENT Paul Smith, resident and father, requested that hockey facilities be. provided at the Community Center for he following reasons: - Good dimensions and high fences - Traffic would be least intrusive - Good parking facilities - Lighting is available - Safety of children Chris Smith, student at HVS, requested Fiberglas (or Plexiglas) boundaries if a hockey facility is installed to limit -injuries against a chain-link fence. He also supported bringing hockey. leagues to Hermosa, stating it would support sportsmanship, teamwork and fun. Danny Erickson, student at HVS, believes that along with Hermosa Beach residents, there would be a lot of support from surrounding communities to participate in roller hockey leagues. Shea McCurdy, student at HVS, requested that the City donate safety gear and team jerseys. AVP 2 -MAN PRO BEACH VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT Matt Gage, AVP Tournament Director, requested that 500 priority seats be sold at tournament to "bridge the credibility gap" with the sponsors and the media. 1 Motion: "To approve contract as submitted by staff." Reviczky/Crecy All Ayes Motion: "Move to deny request to sell priority seats. Reviczky/Blaco All Ayes PROFESSIONAL TENNIS INSTRUCTION Motion: It "To receive and file." Reviczky/Blaco All Ayes Abstain: Crecy COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE RATES Motion: DOGS IN "To approve new lease rates." Peirce/Crecy All Ayes TOT LOTS Motion: "To follow staff's recommendation to place a notice at Fort -Lots -o -Fun and Sea View parks that would emphasize the problems that have been occurring in the parks with regard to dogs off -leash and owners not cleaning up after their pets for a period of two (2) months and that if the problem is not mitigated, the Commission forward a recommendation to the City Council that would prohibit dogs in the city's two (2) tot lots." Blaco/Reviczky Ayes: Blaco, Crecy, Peirce, Reviczky No: McCurdy ELECTION OF OFFICERS Motion: "To nominate Susan Blaco as Perice/Crecy All Ayes Motion: "To nominate Steve Crecy as Blaco/Peirce All Ayes new chairperson." new Vice Chairperson." STAFF REPORT Greenbelt Crossing Control: To agendize for next scheduled meeting. Note: Commissioner McCurdy expressed that certain Council Members' choice of words regarding this item were inappropriate and demeaning. OTHER MATTERS Burk Bussiere gave a report on the progress of new backboards in the Community Center Gymnasium. Estimated that project will cost $3,000 and requested that the remaining $2,000 be reallocated for a new scoreboard. Youth basketball will pay for any cost exceeding $2,000 for the new scoreboard. Motion: "To allocate remainder of $5,000 to scoreboard (CIP #92-506)." Reviczky/Blaco All Ayes 2 November 6, 1992 Mary Rooney City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach Community Center 710 Pier Ave Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mary, ASSOCIATION VOLLEYBALL PROFESSIONALS The Association of Volleyball Professionals (AVP) is now planning for its 1993 season and would like to include your city on next year's schedule. Over the last five years the AVP has built an esteemed reputation as a result of its professional standards and superior events. This commitment to excellence has not waned and will be most evident if your city is the host of a 1993 AVP/Miller Lite Professional Beach Volleyball Tournament. Please note the attached information sheet which provides a comprehensive detail of the proposed AVP; Miller Lite Pro Beach Volleyball Tournament to be held in your city. This sheet - not only provides an accurate overview of the events but alludes as well to the unique bond and vested interest a tour sponsor establishes with the event. It is for this reason the AVP requires that no other person and or entity have any promotional, sponsorship concession or signage rights either within or anywhere near the event site (with the exception of permanent or ongoing places of business). An item in the outline that bares further elaboration is a charge for admission. Last year the AVP brought forth the concept of charging for priority seating - those seats nearest center court - and with only a couple of exceptions, approval was given to implement such a charge at all of our events across the country. Unfortunately, due to a number of logistical factors the AVP could not actually follow through on implementing the charge. In 1993 the AVP proposes to sell not only priority seating, but general admission seating as well wherever permissible. In the near future I will call to further discuss this possibility. Although there are assuredly many details to work out, WE TRUST THIS INFORMATION WILL ALLOW YOU TO CONFIRM OUR TOURNAMENT ON THE DATE INDICATED. Please send any relevant paperwork to our offices as soon as possible. It is our fervent desire to have the 1993 schedule finalized by January, and we would appreciate your help in this regard. If I can be of any assistance, please call me at your convenience. Thank you. Association of Volleyball Professionals ATTN: Matt Gage, Tour Director 100 Corporate Pointe, Suite 160 Culver City, CA 90230 Phone (310) 337-4842, Fax (310) 645-7024 100 Corporate Pointe, Suite 195 Culver City, CA 90230 (310) 337-48.42 Fax 310] 645-7024 1993 AVP/MILLER LITE PRO BEACH VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT ♦ FACT SHEET • DATES REQUESTED: August 24-26, 1993 - set-up August 27-29, 1993 - event SITE: At the Pier EVENT TIME -FRAME: Approximately 7:00 A.M. - 8:00 P.M. Friday, Saturday and Sunday. EQUIPMENT ON SITE: Two tour trucks, one sponsor truck, T.V. truck and generator, concession truck and trailer, bleachers, two camera platforms, stage, P.A. system, electronic scoreboard, up to 12 tents, two inflatables, banners, flags, and up to eight volleyball courts. PERSONNEL: PARKING: ACTIVITIES: The AVP will provide all personnel necessary to properly handle the set-up, breakdown, security, administration and operation of the tournament. It is essential the AVP have parking access for the tour trucks and television truck. Parking for staff and V.I.P.'s is critical as well. 1) Set -Up and Promotion 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday. 2) Volleyball Pro -Amateur If room permits, a Charity Pro -Am will be held either Wednesday or Thursday. 3) Volleyball Play begins at 9:00 A.M. Friday and Saturday and 8:00 A.M. Sunday. Play generally ends about 6:00 P.M. each day. 4) Beauty Contest The contest will be held from at 12:00 Noon on Saturday. 5) Public Address Announcing Our announcer will announce the volleyball games, the beauty contest, do occasional promotions and play music intermittently via the use of amplified sound; no five music. 6) Filming The event will be filmed for television Two camera platforms and a TV truck will be on-site. 7) Radio Remote The official event radio station would have the opportunity to do a remote on- site. This remote would not include "Live Entertainment" and would be conducted from a 10'x 10' tent or van. 8) Sponsor Display Select tour sponsors display their product to the public via use of a 10'x 10' tents. 9) Ford Truck Display Ford will display three to five "specialty" trucks on-site which would incorporate a semi -truck vehicle. 10) Sampling Select tour sponsors offer their product free of charge and in limited size containers to the public. 11) Sponsor Hospitality The AVP would like the opportunity to set up a private, by invitation only, hospitality area for our major sponsor. Food, and where permissable, beer will be served to these select guests. 12) Priority Seating/General Admission Charge The AVP will sell seating to the public where permissible. 13) Concessions a. Tour apparel - The AVP sells tour souvenirs: T-shirts, tank tops, hats, shorts, sweat shirts at each of our events. b. Souvenir programs - The AVP will sell souvenir programs to the public. c. Sponsor Product - Select sponsors would sell their product to the public. Bausch & Lomb sunglasses and Spalding VolleyballIs are currently in this category. d. Food and beverage - Where possible, the AVP would prefer to sell food and beverages for public consumption. e. Beer - Where possible, the AVP would prefer to sell beer for public consumption. 14) Awards Ceremony Approximately 6:00 P.M. Sunday. 15) Break -Down Approximately 6:30 P.M. to 9:30 P.M. Sunday. c:lmg\eitergst City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 318-0280 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION Organization's Name: .3�,C'�', V Z)L Profit Non -Profit Non-profit Number Organization's Address: /00 Ci%,'EV-' E ,/iCr7 /,C VE,C' 6/7 6)/4- 9C7q 3() Zip Code Phone Numbers) : 337 4"4"/ 7 Contact Person and Title: ,/77,q77- ,%Ce..)/C- /,/2ECTb<-) Contact Person's Address: ,4-.3 iga.ci/E Zip Code Daytime Phone Number:/415436,12 Evening Phone Number: Brief Description of Event: / O ,3E90-/ t %(Le/a L ✓ /-/v.,c 7)7'. Date(s) of Event: gt" -7-./ r . g3 Location(s) of Event: VC' et3,4eZ -e PiCe; 4011-7)7 (itie;e-r41 A',;e4 Z;41. (3(7417-4,-.-7 /- �F=UTi`f - i 4 ,e i /.E.00 Set-up Time: �� '/ - -114, /9 �• �� /e.'712 - t. Jf 1-� Time Event is. to Commence:_ alp `l %- et, fV,r-ri 80o.4/ MMINWIM—_lamas/MOlhsOBUSWOMM/UM4IMMO7M Aa i -N - MM w 9 M n •9 • n •1 7 -! 1 1 Number of Participants (Including volunteers): /CC Anticipated Number of Spectators: 5000 - /r,( ,G; 7-7 �},, Number of Vehicles Involved and How Used: T60,C,6;,,i7777 'i/Giez. 4 77 1/, v/l9.t/, UruF Ot-71.e" '77- r XL* 45 02' ', /'l/"t - . ' y�/J% L . ' i �'�L' 7T.L��j /E' ./770 v/iCe. /FT ,4:% 976,v/'+6 L. ter( LS, Description of Set-up for this Event: G E J�L�•9�1 �fi�'� . ? i�t'.�G 7.r�1�'�_C5-'S // -z_›43= Additional Information or(Special..Requests: (F) rl'% ft 7�%� F C'� 7%4-7.."54/7/0/ (--), _ � G/ti' / (6—)c/ %' T L/'i J 4r,c.c. /J'1 cio r-i7N) Fees, Charges and Other Requirements: Police Costs $ Fire Costs $ Business License - $ Public Works Costs $ Processing Fee $ Other Costs $ Total Due $ Refundable Damage Deposit $ Damage Deposit is due: Balance of fees incurred are due: Insurance Required: Yes No Date Received Unless greater or lessor coverage is requested, applicant agrees to furnish the City of Hermosa beach evidence of $1 million comprehensive general liability insurance in the form of a certificate, covering the entire period of this permit, naming the City of Hermosa Beach and its employees as additional insured. Expiration Date Permittee waives claims against the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees, for fees or damages caused by, arising out of, or in any way connected with the exercise of this permit. APPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND TO MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION AND TO RETURN SAID PREMISES IN THE SAME CONDITION AS THEY WERE BEFORE SAID USE. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ALL FEES, CHARGES AND OTHER NECESSARY MATERIAL WILL BE PAID AND/OR FURNISHED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES AS MUTUALLY AGREED TO BY BOTH PARTIES. 2-4-d51r11 Company Represestive Date Permit to be processed through City Council: Yes No If YES, Council's decision: Application is invalid without the following signatures: Department of Community Date Resources Police Department Authorization Fire Department Authorization if Required Life Guard Authorization Needed on all Water Events Date Date Date Pi (Ivor i .••••••••••0111., 1 P.JC.VLS LtIIIEIJ 1 1 7.1 5 eix15 MAID r 1I1 P 1 too° C9Nce.s3 ic" "(f 1 ") le'I " 5. ra.. Ler EJ LII El EJ El E-1 I 1993 PRO VOLLEYBALL EVENTS MAY S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 4 -MAN PRO C.E. SPORTS ® 4 - MAN 25 26 27 28 29 FIESTA DE LAS ARTES 30 FIESTA DE LAS ARTES PRO C.E. SPORTS 31 FIESTA DE LAS ARTES 1993 PRO VOLLEYBALL EVENTS JUNE S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1© PRO WOMEN WPVA 1© PRO WOMEN WPVA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 PLEASE NOTE: NO VOLLEYBALL EVENTS PROPOSED FOR JULY. 1993 1993 PRO VOLLEYBALL EVENTS AUGUST e S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 SURF FESTIVAL 7 SURF FESTIVAL 8 SURF FESTIVAL 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ©7 MEN'S PRO TOURNEY ©8 MEN'S PRO TOURNEY e9 MENS PRO TOURNEY 30 31 1993 PRO VOLLEYBALL EVENTS SEPTEMBER S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 FIESTA DE LAS ARTES 5 FIESTA DE LAS ARIES 6 FIESTA DE LAS ARTES 7 8 9 10 11 LEGENDS PRO TOURNEY 1© LEGENDS PRO TOURNEY 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 PRIORITY SEATING 1993 BUDGET 500 SEATS EXPENSE PER CITY TICKETS 177 WRISTBANDS 140 TICKET SELLERS (FRI 8-6, SAT 8-6, SUN 8-12) 300 ON SITE SUPERVISION 500 USHER/SECURITY 250 TOTAL EXPENSE PER CITY 17 SITES X $1,367 TOUR EXPENSE 1,367 $23,239 AVP WILL DRIVE 500 SEATS FROM SITE TO SITE IN A RENTAL TRUCK. THE DRIVER WILL WORK THE WEEKENDS SETTING UP AND TEARING DOWN THE SEATS AND ALSO WORK AS AN USHER TRUCK RENTAL 5 MONTHS X 1,150 5,750 .10 X 31,000 MILES 3,100 GAS 5,000 DRIVER SALARY $520 PER WEEK X 24 WEEKS 12,480 PER DIEM $200 PER WEEK X 24 WEEKS 4, 800 HOTEL $500 PER WEEK X 24 WEEKS 12,000 SUPERVISOR HOTEL $200 PER 15 SITES 3,000 AIRFARE $350 PER 14 SITES 4,900 PER DIEM $90 PER 15 SITES 1,350 ADDITIONAL EXPENSES CONSUMER PUBLICATIONS 5,000 IN HOUSE TEMPORARY HELP $240 PER WEEK X 24 WEEKS 5,760 TOTAL TOUR EXPENSE $63,140 TOTAL EXPENSE $86,379 PROJECTED REVENUE (100% SALES) $195,432 - 10% CITY SPLIT [19,543] - 20% UNSOLD CONTINGENCY [39,086] - TOTAL EXPENSE [86,379] PAID SEATING NET REVENUE (TOUR) $50,424 PROJECTED HERMOSA BEACH/AVP NET REVENUE BREAKDOWN PRIORITY SEATING NET REVENUE PER EVENT $2,966 HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE (10% GROSS - BASED ON 80% SALES) 920 AVP REVENUE $2,046 BREAKDOWN OF PROJECTED REVENUE 500 SEATS ROW SEATS PRICE TOTAL 1 60 30 1,800 2 60 30 1,800 3 68 22 1,496 4 68 22 1,496 5 76 22 1,672 6 76 22 1,672 7 84 15 1,260 8 20 15 300 TOTAL: $11,496 17 SITES X $11,496 = $195,432 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION 45 FREMONT, SUITE 2000 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2219 VOICE AND TDD (415) 904-5200 TO: Commissioners and Interested Parties DATE:12/28/92 FROM: Peter Douglas, Executive Director T� gC Sherilyn Sarb, Chief of Permits, San Diego District SUBJECT: Proposed Guidelines for the Exclusion of Temporary Events from Coastal Commission Coastal Development Permit Review I. Introduction The attached proposed guidelines are to identify the standards the Executive Director shall use in determining whether a temporary event is excluded from coastal development permit requirements pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 30610 (i) (as amended by SB 1578, Ch. 1088, Stats. 1992) which states: Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, no coastal development permit shall be required pursuant to this chapter for the following types of development and in the following areas:... (i)(1) Any proposed development which the executive director finds to be a temporary event which does not have any significant adverse impact upon coastal resources within the meaning of guidelines adopted pursuant to this subdivision by the commission. The commission shall, after public hearing, adopt guidelines to implement this subdivision and to assist local governments and persons planning temporary events in complying with this division by specifying the standards which the Executive Director shall use in determining whether a temporary event is excluded from permit requirements pursuant to this subdivision. The guidelines adopted pursuant to this subdivision are exempt from the review of the Office of Administrative Law and from the requirements of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. (2) Exclusion or waiver from the coastal development permit requirements of this division pursuant to this subdivision does not diminish, waive, or otherwise prevent the commission from asserting and exercising its coastal development permit jurisdiction over any temporary event at any time if the commission determines that the exercise of its jurisdiction is necessary to implement the coastal resource protection policies of Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 30200). II. Staff Recommendation and Summary Staff recommends the Commission adopt the attached guidelines, the effect of which are, to generally require a coastal development permit only for Temporary Events 12/28/92 Page 3 necessarily limited to, events proposed adjacent to or within floodplains or wetland areas, or events that involve road or parking lot closures during peak summer season. Section III is necessary due to the nature of temporary events and the fact that it is not possible to anticipate all types of events and associated impacts which may represent a conflict with Coastal Act policies for specific inclusion in these guidelines. The criteria includes sufficient specificity to identify to local governments and promoters what issues may be of concern to the Commission; however, the criteria is general enough to allow the Commission the ability to review permit applications for those new events which have the potential to raise public access concerns and/or potential resource conflicts, and to assert jurisdiction those events which are brought to the Commission's attention, either before of after -the -fact, which result in identifiable problems. Finally, the guidelines, as drafted, do not contain any new procedures for - processing exclusions from permit requirements. The exclusions for temporary events. pursuant to these guidelines, will be handled by the individual district offices in much the same way as exemptions from permit requirements are handled currently. There is no provision for reporting exclusions which are granted to the Commission. Temporary Events 12/28/92 Page 5 e) The event is held on sandy beach area in a remote location with minimal demand for public use, and there is no potential for adverse effect on sensitive coastal resources; or, f) The event is less than one day in duration; or, g) The event has previously received a coastal development permit and will be held in the same location, at a similar season, and for the same duration, with operating and environmental conditions substantially the same as those associated with the previously—approved event. III. Executive Director or Commission Discretion to Require a Permit. The Executive Director, or the Commission through direction to the Executive -- Director, may determine that a temporary event shall be subject to Commission coastal development permit review, even if the criteria in Section III. are met, if the Executive Director or the Commission determines that unique circumstances exist relative to a particular temporary event that have the potential for significant adverse impacts on coastal resources. Such circumstances may include, but are not limited to, the following: a) The event, either individually or together with other temporary events scheduled before or after the particular event, precludes the general public from use of a public recreational area for a significant period of time; b) The event and its associated activities or access requirements will either directly or indirectly impact environmentally sensitive habitat areas, rare or endangered species, significant scenic resources; or other coastal resources as defined in Section V. of these guidelines; c) The event is scheduled between Memorial Day weekend and Labor Day and would restrict public use of roadways or parking areas or otherwise - significantly impact public use or access to coastal waters; d) The event has historically required a coastal development permit to address and monitor associated impacts to coastal resources. IV. Modifications to Guidelines by the Commission. The Commission may amend these guidelines at any time if it is determined such modification is necessary to more effectively implement Section 30610(i) of the Coastal Act, and provide Coastal Commission coastal development permit review of any category of temporary events having the potential for significant impacts to coastal resources; or, eliminate such review of any category of temporary events having no such potential. • STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO COAST AREA 3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-1725 (619) 521-8036 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Tuesday, January 12, 1993 TIME: 9:00 a.m. PLACE: Guest Quarters Suite Hotel 1707 Fourth Street Santa Monica, CA The proposed guidelines for Coastal Commission implementation of new authority to exclude from coastal development permit jurisdiction certain temporary events pursuant to Section 30610(i) of the Coastal Act (as amended by SB 1578, Ch. 1088, Stats. 1992) This item has been tentatively scheduled as follows: Administrative Permit Consent Calendar Extension Request Adoption of Findings Request for Reconsideration Material Amendment Hearing and Voting on Regular Calendar SEE NOTE ON PAGE 2 Continued Hearing and Voting on Regular Calendar Public Hearing on Regular Calendar Substantial Issue Determination and Hearing and Voting on Appeals from Local Government Decisions Continued Hearing and Voting on Appeals from Local Government Decisions X Executive Director's Report — Public Hearing and Possible Action If, after reading this information and the project description above, you have questions, please contact Sherilyn Sarb at the Commission's San Diego District Office at (619) 521-8036. The staff report is available and will be mailed to you upon request. A February 1, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of February 9, 1993 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council ADOPT the attached Resolution. Background: Pursuant to Article 18, section B, of the current Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Hermosa Beach Police Officers' Association, the City agreed to amend the contract with the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) to include Section 20930.3 - Military Service Credit as Public Service. PERS procedure requires the Public Agency to adopt the attached Resolution of Intention to initiate the contract amendment. Analysis: Section 20930.3 - Military Service Credit as Public Service allows the employee (in this case police officers) to purchase up to four (4) years of service credit for any continuous active military service prior to employment. The employee must contribute an amount equal to the contribution for current and prior service that the employee and employer would have made with respect to that period of service. The employee's payment is calculated by PERS and may be paid in. one lump sum or by monthly payments not to exceed 96 months. Any impact to the City's PERS rate will emerge in future valuations and is dependent on the number of employees electing this provision. According to PERS, it is not uncommon for the cost to the employee to exceed $5,000 for each year of military service. Fiscal Impact: For this amendment, PERS does not adjust the City's contribution rate. According to PERS, it is most likely that there is no future impact to the employer rate since the employee is required to remit to PERS an amount equal to the contribution for prior 2 a service that the employee and"'employer would have made with respect to the period of military service purchased. PERS further stated that approximately 4 years ago they did increase the employer contribution rate to provide this amendment but stopped that practicewhenit was determined that this was not actuarially necessary. Respectfully sub fitted: Concur: Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager dam{`y'3-/aZ_3 February 1, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council of February 9, 1993 City Council Meeting AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT WITH THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (PERS) AUTHORIZING SECTION 20930.3 - MILITARY SERVICE CREDIT FOR LOCAL POLICE MEMBERS ONLY Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council WAIVE further reading and INTRODUCE the attached Ordinance Background: The preceding item on this agenda was a Resolution of Intent regarding amending the City's contract with PERS to include section 20930.3 - Military Service Credit. As stated in the preceding item, pursuant to Article 18, section B, of the current Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Hermosa Beach Police Officers' Association, the City agreed to amend the contract with the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) to include Section 20930.3 - Military Service Credit as Public Service. PERS procedure requires the Public Agency to adopt a Resolution of Intent and an Ordinance as attached to accomplish the contract amendment. PERS allows that the Resolution of Intent may be adopted the same day as the first reading of the Ordinance. Since the adoption of the Ordinance cannot be earlier than twenty (20) days after the adoption of the Resolution of Intent, this Ordinance will be scheduled for final adoption at the meeting of March 9, 1993. Analysis: Section 20930.3 - Military Service Credit as Public Service allows the employee (in this case police officers) to purchase up to four (4) years of service credit for any continuous active military service prior to employment. The employee must contribute an amount equal to the contribution for current and prior service that the employee and employer would have made with respect to that period of service. The effective date of this contract amendment will be April 14, 1993 which is thirty-one (31) days from the scheduled Ordinance adoption date of March 9, 1993. The miscellaneous employees (non -sworn) have had this PERS provision since 1980. - 1 - Fiscal Impact: For this amendment, there is no increase to the City's current contribution rate. If the employee elects this benefit, that employee is required to remit to PERS an amount equal to the contribution for current and prior service that the employee and employer would have made with respect to the period of military service purchased. This payment may be made by the employee in either a lump sum or monthly payments over a 96 month period. Respectfully submi ed: Concur: Robert A. Personnel Noted for f Blackwood Director fiscal Imact: Viki Copeland Finance Director rab/pers3 Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER 323 PIER AVENUE • P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (310) 376-0951 • FAX (310) 798-2594 RECEIVED OF COMMERCE FEB 0 1 1993 CITY MGR. OFFICE January 29, 1993 Mayor Albert Wiemens and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Mayor Wiemens and Members of the Council: On behalf of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, we would like to invite you to participate with the Chamber President, Rick Learned, in a joint presentation at the annual meeting of the South Bay Association of Chambers of Commerce. As we know, Hermosa Beach and other South Bay cities face unprecedented economic challenges. How our city governments deal with these economic pressures will be the focus of the Association's annual meeting on Friday, February 26 from 8 am to 1:30 pm at the Torrance Marriott Hotel. All eighteen mayors of South Bay cities are being invited to join with their Chamber presidents to give a 3 to 5 minute presentation summarizing the economic situation in their city. The focus of the presentation will be on three questions: 1. How has our city been impacted by the economy? 2. What are we doing about it? 3. What can county, state federal officials and business leaders do to help? The Chamber will assist with development of our joint presentation, with input and review by the city. Should you be unable to attend this meeting, we would like to askthe Mayor Pro Tempore to represent our city government. We respectfully request this letter be placed on the February 9 council agenda for consideration and discussion. Sincerely, HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE dakiL Carol Hunt Executive Director Immo' Omni imm fe L&-) �-Q-y 7 d AA_ 0-,-) MEMORANDUM TO: COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: SAM Y. EDGERTON AND ALBERT WIEMANS RE: REPORT FROM SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRAND/BEACH DRIVE PROPERTY OWNERS PRIVATE USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1993 THE ASSIGNMENT Sam and I were nominated as council representatives to study the problem of private use of public rights of way ("R/W"), with the assignment to look first at the private use of City R/Ws along Beach Drive, although such problem is not confined to Beach Drive alone, but exists City-wide. The private use of a City R/W affects virtually every corner of this community. For instance, on 24th Street between Manhattan Avenue and Park Avenue, a 10 -ft strip of land on each side of the street is a City R/W used by property owners as their front yard. The City can widen the street to INCHES away from a residence wall. Most property owners have no idea that they make private use of a City R/W. Bristling at the idea of "losing" their private right to use the City R/W, however, they object to the similar use of City R/Ws by others, such as along Monterey, the Strand, or Prospect. It takes no extended debate, that in this densely developed community, each square inch of property is treasured. The mere mention of the existence of a City R/W is considered tantamount to a "taking" of a God-given right. In this emotionally charged setting, there is plenty fuel for each of us on this Council to turn this City into an inferno. We decided to leave the emotional issues on the shelf and limit ourselves to dealing with factors that were capable of some objective measurement. To that end, we had to get a grip on precisely what it was that the City needed to sell, dispose of, or otherwise transfer, and whether or not such sale, disposition or other transfer was viable, or for that matter, permitted by law. You may rest assured that we did not view this assigment as a license to give away the store or an opportunity to gain political favors. We proceeded diligently and to the best or our ability. We offer no apology and expect no medals. The solutions to the problem change from block to block. Any detailed summary of specific solutions would only aggravate the problem and generate volumes of paper. To us, it is clear that imposing one single solution on all property owners in the Beach Drive area is an open invitation to disaster. MEMORANDUM TO: COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: SAM Y. EDGERTON AND ALBERT WIEMANS DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1993 DESCRIPTION AND PERMITTED USES OF CITY R/Ws ALONG BEACH DRIVE Roughly stated, in the Beach Drive area, the City R/Ws are comprised of the following: A. A 6 -ft strip of land along the EAST side of the Strand wall, which fronts all of the Strand lots. This was acquired by the City as a DEED RESTRICTION from Strand property owners, to be used by the City EXCLUSIVELY for utility and other PUBLIC purposes. Here, the City has the following choices with the following CONSTRAINTS: 1. It can MAINTAIN the City R/W AS IS, i.e. the City retains the opportunity to use the 6 -ft strip for utility or other PUBLIC purpose at some INDEFINITE time in the future. (Here, the City can issue encroachment permits to adjacent property owners, and the City can cancel such encroachment permit AT WILL). 2. The City can resolve that it NEEDS the R/W for some utility or other PUBLIC purpose, NOW or reasonably soon. (Here, the City MUST cancel all enroachment permits and declare any obstacles as NUISANCES, forcing those who erected the obstacles to remove the same forthwith). 3. The City can resolve that it NO LONGER NEEDS the R/W for some utility or other PUBLIC purpose. (Here, the City MUST VACATE the property to the adjacent property owners). B. When the City was incorporated, the City acquired from the County all property which the Hermosa Land & Water Company granted to the County as public thoroughfares. The City was required to maintain such property EXCLUSIVELY for the uses and purposes for which the same was held by the County. In the early 1920s, the Council resolved to change the street into "walk -streets." The center of the new walkstreet became a large planter -box, and a 6 -ft strip on the NORTH side and on the SOUTH side of the planter -box constituting the City R/W, which the City had allowed adjacent property owners to use as their front yards. As such, a 6 -ft strip of land along the NORTH and along the SOUTH side of each walkstreet ending on to the Strand became a City R/W. For many moons, the City had allowed the adjacent property owners along the walk -street to use the City R/W as their front yard. 2 MEMORANDUM TO: COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: SAM Y. EDGERTON AND ALBERT WIEMANS DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1993 THE NATURE OF THE BEAST As you all know, Beach Drive was initially an "alley." At this time, however, it sports a number of residences with a Beach Drive address. Beach Drive runs EAST of and parallel with the Strand and constitutes the rear property line of the Strand lots. Beach Drive is the only vehicular access to the Strand lots. No vehicular traffic is permitted on the Strand. For purposes of the study, we have treated Beach Drive as a STREET, instead of an alley. The WEST side of Beach Drive is often used by Strand owners for parking. In a number of instances, Strand owners occupying a lot on the corner of a walk -street ("WEST CORNER LOT OWNERS") , have incorporated the City R/W along the walkstreet into their "side - yard." Some have removed fire hydrants at their own cost and used the City R/W as additional parking spaces. The shortage of parking along Beach Drive can be easier understood, when one realizes that Beach Drive does "double -duty" in providing parking, namely (i) to Strand owners who have no vehicular access other than through Beach Drive, and (ii) to Beach Drive owners. As such, WEST CORNER LOT OWNERS value the City R/W (along the walk -street side of their lot) to make up for parking deficiencies. Some of such deficiencies appear legitimate, such as children, grandchildren, and friends. Some of such deficiencies appear less than legitimate, such as garages which are used for storage or living quarters, or residences with have been carved up into multi- family dwellings or bootlegs. DISMISSING OBJECTIONABLE SOLUTIONS AB INITIO,. The private use of City R/Ws is an emotionally charged issue that can escalate into this City's worst nightmare, even without polarizing positions according to individual egos on this Council. To that end, our objective was towards arriving at some workable solutions in an aesthetically pleasing environment not only for the City at large, or the present property owners who had invested their lives and livelihoods, but also for future generations. We emphasized the common goals we could reach as a community working together, and we dismissed objectionable matters that served to further division or cloud the issues so that the trees could not be set apart from the forest. As such, we did not delve intothe issue of selling City R/Ws, for these reasons: 3 MEMORANDUM TO: COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: SAM Y. EDGERTON AND ALBERT WIEMANS DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1993 1. The City does not possess the unrestricted open space right to the R/W involved. 2. The City is constrained in how it can dispose of R/Ws it acquired for utility or other PUBLIC use purpose. 3. The market value attributed to a particular City R/W is SUBJECTIVE and SPECULATIVE at best. 4. There is no fixed market value at which the City can "sell" its R/Ws. 5. There is no method known to us, whereby the City could force one person to accept a sales price (or lease price) and terms which another person similarly situated had theretofore accepted. 6. This is not a situation of an UNAUTHORIZED EXPENDITURE of City moneys; the situation is clear in that the value is too speculative or contingent as to be capable of reasonable ascertainment. 7. The law may not permit the City to sell or to lease a particular R/W. In this regard, it is not our intent to, nor do we, advise this Council, other than to consult with the City Attorney. Neither did we consider possibilities that were not "in the cards," such as using the 6 -ft strip on the EAST side of the Strand as a bike -path. DEFINING THE OPPOSING CAMPS To be sure, this Council must determine the BEST USE of the City R/Ws. Sam and I submit, that in doing so the Council should have foremost in mind, the City's CONSTRAINTS, in that the City R/W MUST BE USED for a utility or other PUBLIC purpose. No doubt, considering the density of our community and the need of our inhabitants for private transportation and mobility, the Council is not precluded from taking into consideration other issues affecting the general welfare of its inhabitants, such as PARKING. 4 TO: FROM: DATE: MEMORANDUM COUNCILMEMBERS SAM Y. EDGERTON AND ALBERT WIEMANS FEBRUARY 2, 1993 If the Council should choose to frame the issue narrowly, e.g. SHOULD PRIVATE PARKING BE ALLOWED ON A CITY R/W, the issue MUST BE RESOLVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WHAT CHOICES ARE LEGALLY AVAILABLE TO THE CITY. IF THE ISSUE IS FRAMED AS PARKING, the PROPONENTS include the following groups: A. WEST CORNER LOT OWNERS. B. Owners of lots fronting along the Strand and backing on to Beach Drive (other than WEST CORNER LOT OWNERS), who readily submit that WEST CORNER LOT OWNERS "paid premium" for their corner lots to "purchase" the opportunity to develop such lots to fit their individual needs, and oftentimes, such needs include additional parking ("MIDDLE STRAND LOT OWNERS"). C. Owners of lots on the EAST corner of a walk - street and Beach Drive, who use the City R/W as their "front yard" ("EAST CORNER LOT OWNERS"). D. Owners of lots along the walk -street (other than EAST CORNER LOT OWNERS) ("WALK -STREET LOT OWNERS"), who use the City R/W as their "front yard," but who DO NOT OBJECT to EAST CORNER LOT OWNERS using their lots for PARKING (these people believe that EAST CORNER LOT OWNERS paid "premium" for their East corner lot, and should have the benefit of their purchase. The OPPONENTS of parking include the following groups: A. City R/W B. City R/W C. property EAST CORNER LOT OWNERS, who want to use tneir for quiet enjoyment of the ocean. WALK STREET LOT OWNERS, who want to use their for quiet enjoyment of the ocean. Other citizens of the City who do not own on Beach Drive, a walk -street, or the Strand. FORMATION OF STUDY GROUP As your obedient servants, Sam and I formed a "study group," consisting of Thomas Allen, II1, Esq., James Gerlich, and Chris 5 MEMORANDUM TO: COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: SAM Y. EDGERTON AND ALBERT WIEMANS DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1993 Wagenbrenner, to make recommendations, but only with respect to the Strand property owners (WEST CORNER LOT OWNERS, MIDDLE STRAND LOT OWNERS, and EAST CORNER LOT OWNERS). In this regard, it was clear that each property owner would act in accordance with the dictates of his pocket -book, considering the interest of his neighbors, secondary at best and incidental at worst. Tom and Jim are WEST CORNER LOT OWNERS, where the property owner has integrated a portion of the City right of way ("R/W") in their "side -yards." Chris is an EAST CORNER LOT OWNER. Each of the members of the Study Group on Beach Drive recognized the diverse interests of individuals who are differently situated. None of the members expressed any willingness to tolerate subjugation to the will of someone whose interest in the property concerned was tangential or incidental. Sam and I share their belief that local concerns must be resolved by the local residents. When a property owner EAST of PCH is called upon to formulate a decision binding on a Strand property owner, we would invite chaos, and bid adieu to reason and common sense. In speaking to WEST CORNER LOT OWNERS, MIDDLE STRAND LOT OWNERS, and EAST CORNER LOT OWNERS, Sam and I recognized that each sought to advance his or her own interest. For instance: A. WEST CORNER LOT OWNERS almost unanimously suggested that the City should VACATE the 6 -ft strip of City R/W along the walk -street side of their lot. B. MIDDLE STRAND LOT OWNERS and WEST CORNER LOT OWNERS suggested that the 6 -ft strip of land along the Strand should be VACATED to the adjacent property owners. C. Some EAST CORNER LOT OWNERS were adamant that there should be NO PARKING on the EAST SIDE CORNER LOTS as well as on the WEST CORNER LOTS. D. Other EAST CORNER LOT OWNERS insisted that PARKING MUST BE PERMITTED on the EAST CORNER LOTS as well as the WEST CORNER LOTS. However, we were surprised that most property owners were willing to reach a compromise. Here are some examples: 6 MEMORANDUM TO: COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: SAM Y. EDGERTON AND ALBERT WIEMANS DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1993 A. WEST CORNER LOT OWNERS would be satisfied with an encroachment permit that would enable them to use the City R/W along the walk -street of their property. They were willing to carry insurance naming the City as an insured party. They were willing to leave the front 55 feet landscaped and set apart by a wall of hedge, conforming to specific guidelines. On the back 35 feet of the lot, they would then be entitled to have paved space for private PARKING. B. EAST CORNER LOT OWNERS would be amenable to seeing WEST CORNER LOT OWNERS develop their property as set forth in the preceding paragraph A. C. EAST CORNER LOT OWNERS would be amenable to seeing REASONABLE PARKING provided on EAST CORNER LOTS, provided, however, that the maintenance of the PARKING area is aesthetically pleasing. In this regard, one EAST CORNER LOT OWNER suggested that he would SLOPE DOWN his driveway on the City R/W, so that his neigbors to the EAST would not have their view of the ocean blocked by the owner's vehicle. Other property owners came forth with other landscaping suggestions. Some of these suggestions are already in existence, for instance on the corner of Beach Drive and 17th Street. STUDY GROUP'S RECOMMENDATIONS The Study Group, including your representatives, makes the following general recommendations to this Council: 1. More can be achieved through cooperation than confrontation; this Council should eschew imposing mandatory rules which all property owners must adhere, particularly, if the individual circumstances of the property owners are not identical. 2. This Council should encourage WEST CORNER LOT OWNERS, EAST CORNER LOT OWNERS, and MIDDLE STRAND LOT OWNERS to work together to formulate some CONSENSUS among most and perhaps all of the property owners. 3. There is no need or perceived mandate that the same or similar solutions must be carried into effect on each City block. 7 TO: FROM: DATE: MEMORANDUM COUNCILMEMBERS SAM Y. EDGERTON AND ALBERT WIEMANS FEBRUARY 2, 1993 4. This Council must allow local residents to resolve local problems. Situations of unresolved conflict can be brought before Staff for some workable solution, or before the Planning Commission, or before this Council. 5. It would be detrimental to involve in any decision making process, people who have no direct ownership interest in the property under consideration, other than a tangential interest as a citizen of this City or otherwise. The Study Group, including your representatives, makes the following specific recommendations to this Council: 1. The problems of WEST CORNER LOT OWNERS and EAST CORNER LOT OWNERS are not the same, and may require different solutions, e.g. the following: A. The WEST CORNER LOT OWNERS should be permitted parking on the Beach Drive side of the walkstreet-side portion of their_lot,. all upon the terms set forth in the attached proposed resolution and ordinance. - B. As to the issuance of encroachment permits, each of the EAST CORNER LOTS should be studied separately. Some of them have been landscaped beautifully and are a fine addition to which neither the WALKSTREET LOT OWNERS or the opposite EAST CORNER LOT OWNERS have any objection. Others are a real eyesore, consis- ting of dead or dying trees, assorted brush, torn -down fences, weeds, sand, miscellaneous old junk, old furniture sacrificed to Mother Nature, and of course, automobiles. The use of the walk -street side of the EAST CORNER LOTS for parking of automobiles, should be limited as much as possible, and allowed in unusual cases where the need for parking can not be reasonably mitigated. 2. Encroachment_ permits should be considered for WEST CORNER LOT OWNERS, all upon the terms set forth in the attached proposed resolution and ordinance. 8 MEMORANDUM TO: COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: SAM Y. EDGERTON AND ALBERT WIEMANS DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1993 3. Each of the EAST CORNER LOTS should be studied separately. As stated before some EAST CORNER LOTS have been beautifully landscaped and are a fine addition to all of the WALKSTREET LOTS. The Study Group would like to see these well-designed areas allowed as parking under an encroachment permit, particularly where there are no objections from the opposite EAST CORNER LOT OWNERS or WALK STREET LOT OWNERS. Where parking is a substantial concern, which can not be mitigated (e.g. through full use of the existing garage), the use for parking on the walk -street side of EAST CORNER LOTS could be granted, where (i). the aesthetics of the neighborhood can be preserved, (ii) the entire area is well landscaped, AND (iii) a portion of the EAST CORNER LOT is maintained as open space enabling WALK STREET LOT OWNERS a relatively unobstructed view of the ocean, and in this regard, special attention can be given to unusual designs such as "sloped" parking. The Study Group favors the exclusive "front yard" use of the EAST CORNER LOTS, particularly, where the need for parking is not substantial, or where such need can be mitigated,through use of existing garages, design changes, or otherwise. SAM Y. EDGERTON ALBERT G. WIEMANS 9 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of Beach City Council FROM: The Planning Commission the Hermosa SUBJECT: Vehicle Parking on Public Rights -of -Way along Beach Drive DATE: February 2, 1993 The Planning Commission would like to state that support and continue to strongly recommend recommendation regarding parking along Beach reminder, a copy of the recommendation made at August 18, 1992, is attached. we unanimously our original Drive. As a our meeting of We would also like to express that we are disturbed and disappointed about the length of time it has taken the Council to resolve this matter. Attachment p/memo3 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 5 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 1, 1992 Regular Meeting of September 8, 1992 VEHICLE PARKING ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG BEACH DRIVE. Recommendation: The recommendation is presented in two parts. The Planning Commission recommendation is presented first and the items with which the Public Works staff disagrees is presented second. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: 1. Establish that for the purposes of this ordinance, all right-of-ways east of Beach Drive and terminating at - Hermosa Avenue, will be treated as front yards and all parking will be prohibited in these areas. 2. Allow the private use of all walk street right-of-ways through the use of a revocable encroachment permit. 3. Continue to allow parking west of Beach Drive under the following conditions: A. All adjacent property owners wishing to park on the City right-of-way west of Beach Drive must apply for a revocable encroachment permit within 60 days of the passage of this ordinance, and must fulfill the terms of the permit within 120 days of the issuance of the permit. B. The terms of the permit are: 1) Establishment of a maximum distance of 30 feet from Beach Drive where parking shall be allowed. This will be a maximum of two cars and parking tags will be issued to adjacent property owners as part of the permit. 2) Establish that 1/3 of the right of way, starting at the Strand wall and moving east must be landscaped. This landscaping must be in place prior to the issuance of the parking permits. 3) Require that a permanent barrier be installed between the parking area and the remainder of the right-of-way area. 4) Require that all access to the right-of-way be from Beach Drive only. 5) Establish that parking is for automobiles only; boats, trailers, motor homes and campers are - 1 - Staff C. prohibited. Parking of automobiles is not to exceed 72 continuous hours. 6) Require fence heights within the right-of-way to be a maximum of 36" high. 7) Establish that the privilege to park will expire under one of the following conditions': a) Fifteen years after the issuance of the permit. b) Upon application to renovate the property. c) Upon sale or transfer of title of the property. d) Upon violation of the terms of the encroachment permit. 8) All improvement plans within the walk street right-of-ways shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to work start up. Require that fees for the parking be set by the City Council. D. Determine that Strand be part E. The properties walk street as separate study. Recommendation: the commercial properties along the of a different study. that have existing garages fronting a the only access will be part of a Staff concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation as follows: Item #3.B.7 Eliminate expiration of the privelege to park upon application to renovate the property or upon sale or transfer of title of the property. Item #3.B.8 Eliminate review of improvement plans by the Planning Commission. except The attached ordinance incorporates the Planning Commission recommendation and would need to be amended if the staff recommendation is followed. Background: The Planning Commission originally heard the Public Works Department report related to parking on pedestrian walk streets at their meeting of April 16, 1991 (copy of report attached). The Planning Commission's recommendations were submitted to the City Council in a report dated on July 23, 1991 (copy of report attached). • The Public Works Department was directed by the City Council on July 23, 1991 to review the parking situation citywide. On February 25, 1992, the City Council changed the direction of the study to only focus on vehicle parking along Beach Drive. The Council directed staff and the Planning Commission to both return with possible alternative solutions. The recommendations as proposed by the Public Works. Department initially went to the Planning Commission for their review in a report dated for the meeting of May 19, 1992 (copy of report attached). The conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission at their meeting on May 19, 1992 are provided in the minutes of the May 19, 1992 meeting (copy of minutes attached). The item was continued to June 2, 1992 for additional review. The item was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of June 16, 1992. The Planning Commission at their meeting of June 16, 1992 continued this item for further discussion to their meeting of July 21, 1992. On July 21, 1992, the Planning Commission continued this item to their meeting of August 18, 1992. The recommendations above were approved at the August 18, 1992 meeting (copy of minutes attached). Analysis: The Public Works Department is of the opinion that the Planning Commission has done an excellent evaluation of the information presented at the public hearings. 1.- Regarding recommendation Number 2 above, a date -should be set so that the concern of City liability can be addressed. At this time, there are very few properties that have encroachment permits and therefore have insurance that protects the City. If someone was hurt within the public right of way, that is encroached upon, the City could be sued as the owner of the property. For those properties that have a valid encroachment permit, - the City is covered. One of the required conditions in - an encroachment permit is that the adjacent property owner is to protect the Cityby having $500,00.0 -of insurance that lists the City as additionally insured. A valid and up to date insurance certificate is provided to the City. 2. Regarding recommendation Number 3.B.1 and 3.C., a parking permit program would have to be established. A resolution implementing such a program would be brought back for City Council approval. 3. Regarding recommendation Number 3.B.7, staff feels that a simple fifteen year amortization period is appropriate. There is no justification to treat properties differently simply because a renovation is proposed or the property is sold or otherwise transferred. 4. Regarding recommendation Number 3.B.8), staff is of the opinon that the existing City code is adequate to handle - 3 - the work within the City street right-of-way under present permit procedures. Encroachment permits are currently reviewed by the Public Works Director subject to established City Code guidelines. Requiring Planning commission approval would unnecessarily lengthen the approval process and increase costs. Within the attached May 19, 1992 Public Works Department report is Table "A" and Table "B" showing the number of lots, and locations where illegal vehicle parking is occurring along Beach Drive. Early morning counts on eleven different dates have shown the existing average total number of vehicles parked along Beach Drive as between 56 and 70 vehicles. There are approximately 22 cars presently being parked on the east side of Beach Drive that would lose their existing parking use. Also, there are approxmately 18 cars over and above the proposed two spaces allocated for parking at each property on the west side of Beach Drive. The proposed initial number of recommended parking spaces to be allowed on the west side of Beach Drive is 58. The City has 3 existing encroachment permits on the west side which prohibit parking at this time. This number of permits would increase under the Planning Commission's recommendation. The environmental effect on existing street parking for the full length of Beach Drive from 1st Street to 24th Street, between Hermosa Avenue and the Strand, will be very minor. The approximate average number of vehicles to be relocated is only 2.5 vehicles per each of the sixteen (16) residential blocks. Because of the minor effect, no Environmental Impact Report would therefore be necessary. Respectfully submitted, L�jir� mil,e2;;4---- Lynn A. Terry v P.E. Deputy City Engineer 6()AL- Ace'"e- William Grove, Interim Director of Public Works Concur: d)/ Michael Schubach Planning Director War' Aki9/4. .9.5z 6 - Steve Steve Wisniewski Public Safety Director Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager rI.OMAs +1 IY0CVCA w1Ll1 AM L SARA CI+4•014..tS 1 VOSC CONN16. COO*C SANOIICA 00ocw .a S.wINGCA COwAAO vlt otc -cAISCAr0 ,. o.A2 J AMcs our" MUA.M, J ANICC R MIVAMIAA •AuL � YGSMINAGA LAW O""1C[S OLIVER. STOEVER, BARR & VOSE coA.o. *Y.o.l 1000 $UNSCY UOu►tvAA0 LOS ANGCLtS. CALIFORNIA 90012 =111 230-3043 MEMORANDUM rcltco..cw 12111 442-3315 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of _Hermosa Beach FROM: harles S. Vose, City Attorney DATE: July 16, 1991 RE: Walk Streets - Encroachments and Public Right of Ways It is my understanding that on the next City Council meeting agenda, various issues will be discussed concerning the legal rights and obligations of the City and adjacent property owners relating to certain walk streets within the City of Hermosa Beach. Based upon ay review of the applicable facts and law concerning this issue, in general, the following three options are available to the City Council concerning this matter: 1. Vacation of those portions of the walk streets which are unnecessary for present or prospective public use (the City. may control the use of the vacated area through zoning regulation). 2. Retain the entire walk streets and grant temporary encroachment permits (control of use through terms of .the permit) . 3. Retain entire walk streets and remove all obstructions and private uses of any portion of the dedicated walk streets as a public nuisance. As part of the original subdivision map for the Hermosa Beach tract, in 1901, the Hermosa Beach Land and Water Company dedicated to the County of Los Angeles certain areas as "public thoroughfares." Upon the incorporation of the City of Hermosa Beach, these dedicated public thoroughfares were transferred to the benefit of the City. Since that date, a number of other walk streets have been dedicated, in general, on similar terms to the City of Hermosa Beach. 4,7 y� SUPPLEMENT AI . , OUVCR. STocvca. BARR & VOSE Memo re Walk Streets - Encroachments and Public Right of Ways July 16, 1991 Page 2. In 1923, an ordinance was adopted by the City Council establishing walk streets for 17 of the previously dedicated public thoroughfares. Since that time, there has been various amendments to the regulation of the walk streets and the applicable controls are set forth in the Municipal Code. It is critical to understand that by ordinance or resolution, the City Council cannot dispense with the original dedication of the.areas as "public thoroughfares." The City Council may limit the manner of public use (prohibition of automobiles, horses, etc.). However, as long as the property is within the control of the City, it must be retained as a "public thoroughfare." As a general rule, the unlawful obstruction of a public highway or street is a nuisance and may be abated as such whether or not the obstruction is on the travelled portion so as actually to inhibit public use. The continuance of an obstruction cannot confer on the person maintaining it prescriptive rights, or rights by adverse possession, as against the public. Laura Vincent Company v. The City of Selma (1941) 43 Cal.App. 2d 473. Neither lapse of time nor consent of the abutting property owner has the effect of legalizing the public nuisance arising from an unlawful obstruction. perio v. Maestretti (1908) 154 Cal. 580. While the principle of estoppel and pais may, in extraordinary, unique circumstances, be invoked against the public, the basis of estoppel would probably not be found to be present in the current circumstances. See City of Imperial Beach v. Algert (1962) 200 Cal.App. 2d 48. If the City Council determines that those portions of the walk streets not presently being used are "unnecessary for present or prospective public use," then the areas should be vacated to the adjoining property owners. (Streets and Highways Code Section 8324) If the City Council determines that the street should be retained in its entirety for present or prospective public use, then no permanent encroachment can be allowed. Except where the use is temporary or the power has been delegated by the legislature, a municipality has no power to authorize the use of its streets for private purposes. Certain temporary obstruction of part of a street are recognized as lawful on the ground of necessity, both by custom and judicial sanction, when they are incidental to the use for which a street is primarily intended and do not unduly interfere with OLIVCR, STOCVER, eARR & VOSE Memo re Walk Streets - Encroachments and Public Right of Ways July 16, 1991 Page 3. the rights of the public. What is temporary and reasonable use of the streets for such purposes ordinarily is a question of fact to be determined exclusively by the legislative body. • If it is determined that the adjacent property owners have, over a period of time, obtained a permanent encroachment on ethical or moral grounds, then the City Council must conclude that those portions of the public thoroughfares are unnecessary for present or prospective public use and, therefore, must vacate the property to the adjacent property owner. If there is to be a retention of the entire portion of the walk streets by the City Council, then any temporary obstruction of any portion of the walk street can only be done through a written encroachment permit issued by the City. Any authorization, whether by permit or constructive consent, to erect or maintain an obstruction in a public thoroughfare or street may be unilaterally revoked by the City and when it is revoked, further maintenance of the obstruction constitutes a public nuisance. It is my understanding that there are -in excess of 500 properties that front on to walk streets. In considering a policy to be adopted, the City Council may restrict the type of uses to be allowed under an encroachment permit as well as the amount of landscaping, insurance and other requirements to be imposed. It is my understanding that an adjacent city have established an encroachment permit process which allows only certain types of uses and the payment of an annual fee sufficient to cover the administrative cost of the encroachment permit program. In addition, in order to guarantee that the encroachments are considered temporary in nature, they should be reviewed on a two to five year basis. CSV:ilf Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 1992 Regular Meeting of April 28, 1992 VEHICLE PARKING ON BEACH DRIVE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Permit staff a time extension to more completely address this subject and brief the new City Manager. Background: The parking on pedestrian streets concern was originally heard at the April 16, 1991, Planning Commission meeting. This item was continued for collection of additional information and allow for more input from the public. On July 2, 1991, the parking item was brought back to the Planning Commission. More information was provided and recommendations were submitted to the City Council. On July 23, 1991, the parking on pedestrian streets item was brought before the City Council. The following staff action items were generated: 1. Look at the issues of private parking on publicly owned property city-wide. 2. Address whether this item requires an environmental review. 3. Take a more in-depth look at how many properties are affected. 4. How many cars are using said parking. On February 11, 1992 this item was brought before the City Council and the following staff action items were generated: 1. Staff to review procedure for vacating certain areas. The first area for review was to be Prospect Avenue. 2. Have the City Manager prepare a report on the City's current parking policy along Beach Drive. At the February 25, 1992, City Council meeting the following staff action items took place: 1. All action on Prospect Avenue was dropped. 2. The staff was directed to focus on vehicle parking along Beach Drive. Analysis: Vehicle parking on pedestrian streets is a phenomenon that impacts both residents and commercial establishments. It also involves several areas of City services and enforcement. These areas include the following. Departments: General Services (Parking) - Parks and Recreation - Public Works - Planning Police Fire Bringing these departments together in a team management concept may permit more comprehensive solutions. mourn f the City Council and the Planning Commission with those solu s will allow the citizenry to provide publis commen s. By allowing the public into the r they ma eel better about the outcome a ocal governmen after having been involved. Alternatives: 1. Present this item to the Planning Commission without the team concept input in order to re -address this subject as soon as possible. 2. Bring back to City Council as soon as possible without waiting for the public comments. Respectfully submiltted, Concur: - Lynn A. Terry v Steve Wisniewski Deputy City Engineer Interim City Manager pworks/CCBCHDR t_ .11111 TO: RE: DATE: COUNCI LMEMBERS PARKING ON CITY JULY 22, 1991 MEMORANDA! OWNED RIGHTS-OF-WAY ier-17-3fLti -"/ r• /0d)-9 A, GENERAL COM.MENTI: 1. OFFSTREET PARKING ("PARKING"; IS Ate E:..Z:&NT :� 4• ,I' AS_r *:'i'�' Y . ;RovIDrNG MINIML 1 PARKING IS THE O8LIGAiI3N OF THE 1. ER 'Y CWyED ZONING CODE SEC. .1153 PROHIBITS PROPERTY OWNERS 5i:Cri R DUCIN•, MINIMUM PARKING BY SELLING, LEASING, OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRING PROPERTY. 2. PARKING ON PARKWAYS (STREETS OTHER THAN PU BL.' C STREETS 02: SIDF..ALKS) IS PROHIBITED. 3. LACK OF PARKING IS A DISEASE AFFLICTING MOST 3,ZACN CII': „ PARKING PROBLEMS ARE NOT UNIQUE TO T gE AREA WEST OF ►, E k.Mt:SA AV `^U E . PARKING IS A CT_TY-+BIDE : •ROBLeM REQUIRING A CITY -WTO^•, SC ..UTION. 4. PARKING IS A "PROPERTY RIGHTS" ISSUE, IN DIGNITY NO s, 5 THAN OWN-ZON_NG OF. UP --ZONING. THIS COUNCIL SI GULD OJ . T3 G^i. cs r TU TREAT HERMOSA RE 1 DENTS FAIRLY AND EQUALLY, I.E. IN T.xE .;.uta`: MANNER UNDER THE SAME CIRCUMSTANCES. THIS C,OES NOT MEA:: THAT THIS COUNCIL MUST RESIGN ITSELF TO THE STATUS -QUO WITHC..T IziQe1Ry AS To WHY THE PROBLEMS CAME TO EXIST IN THE FIRST P:Act. _XIS Coe MUST AVOID VIEWING THE PROBLEM SIMPLY IN TERMS OL 0:a, Y'.ESI_Eh'' BF.CRUCGING ANOTHER PE.LJENT'S PERCEIVED BENEFIT. 5. PARKTNG ON CITY OWNED RIGHTS-OF-WAY (SUCH AS A PARKWAY) i A SHALL PIECE OF THE PUZZLE OF HOW THE CITY OUGHT TO DEAL WIT?: CITY -OWNED PROPERTY IJSEO FoR STREET AND HIGHWAY PURPOSES IN EACH 'C ITS NEIGHBORHOODS. : KIS COUNCIL SHOULD AVOID QUICK SOLUI. IONS CS ='SPT_E ANSWE%R5 . THE PARK/NG DEFICIENCY PROBES SHOULD NOT ?? TACKLED TN SEPARATE QUADRANTS. DOING SO COULD GIVE RISE TO a',.:.EGA "'IONS THAT SO:f:. R=-3 LC:'NTS WERE TREATED "MORE EQUAL" ThaN :TH£RS. 6. THE PP_RKING PROBLEMS WEST OF HERMOSA i'►IEN )e. DTJAPPEAR. IF THIS COUNCIL WOULD SIMPLY TO ENFORCE E LLT':NvO ,'.WA. B. CAUSES OF PARKING: DEFICIENCY: 2. SOME PROPER:: OWNERS NEAR THE STRAND HAVE R.ED►.;CI L MIN':rj?t PARKING BY SELLING, LEASING JR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRING PROPE2TY. 2. THE COST OF PARKING PERMITS IS SO LOW, ".'liAT FEW ;✓ DP' FORCED TO DEAL SERIOUSLY WITH PARKING (AT THE PRESENT .;S >G.37 PE:? DAY Pi•.CFL2.i) _ THIS COUNCIL M?Y WISH TO 2kCVIDE MONE•Ary INCENTIVE TO EAPTY THE GARAGE. 3 • IN THE PAST, THE CITY HAS BEEN LAX IN EN ORCIN ARYI::G. PROPERTY • WNE2S CANN1rr r AND DO RENT OUT :110,.;S:.JG W:TH:Dk.:T iRoVIDiNG ANY PARXIbs:;. 4. CITY OWNED R1GHT3-OF-RAY ARE BEING USED 3y INDIVIDCA PROPERTY OWNERS AS FENCED -TN PRIVATE PROPERTY PR•'' ATE TENANT PARiiING, CR RENTED PARKING, WITHOUT ANY PAY) ENT TO THE CCITY. '-IP C':' OF PRT'JAT,E. PF.aING ON _7usu Q;ea4T;;-^F-Wa;: 1. CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY r)SED FOR PAPYING COUTINLE TO RESEJ'EIE USED CAR LOTS C Eti EN WHEN OCCUPIED uL NEWER VVP2TE AUTOMOBILES). 2. IN EXPENS::'E RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY NEAR T:fE BEACH A PU( .0 RIGHT-OF-WA:a L'3::D FOR PAREIIIG TENDS TO DEPRESS PROPER2i 'ALLIES. 3. A BEACH PROPERTY OWNER'S CONVENIEhCE Cr Ff.AVT_NG NEA.ZBY PARKING MUST BE BALANCED AGAINST T IE RIGH': OF A:1C'_^'r'ER PRCPER Y OWNER TO MAINTAIN HIS SURROUNDINGS FREE CF PERCEIVEC BLt iT OR TO PURSUE CITY BEAUTIFICATION, AS WELL AS AGAINST THE 'JEEC. OF 0Tit2R RESIDENTS AND VIS_TORi FCR PUBLIC SAFETY AND OPEN ;;PACE. 4. CITY -OWNED PROPERTY SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR TR": BENEFIT OF AN INDIVIti^,GAiL PROPERTY OWNER, WHETHER FOR ?R:1^UCTT-O't .) RENTAL INCOME, .ENTERTAINMENT, OR OTHERWISE. M?N'1 OF US HAVE HARD TO GET TO LIVE INA BEACH COMMUNITY, AND EACH :-L RXOSA `I'_ I A -N HAS A COMMON INTEREST IN AND EQUAL VOICE ON CITY -OWNED PROPERTY. S. SOME OF THE PARKING RIGHTS -OF -W__': APPA "LARGIriALL: MAINTAINED, OTHERS HAVE MORE THAN 2 -SPACE TAiNL•S?i BOATS AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES. 6. THE AESTHETIC APPEAL OP THE NEIGliBO4M{`,r,C fS DIMINISHED. 7. ELSEWHERE TM THE CITY, PAR.Y:Ka ON PUBLTC Rivi TS' -J:'-WAY I:1 NOT TOLERATED. D. PERSONAL COMMENTS: 1. A LARGE PORTION OF PROPERTY TN THE CIT'' IS :CWNEC ': TS E CITY FOR STREETS AND OTHER HIGHWAY PURPOSES; SL'C:- L?.N Mr;S^' aEy.A'N Oc DILATED TO SUCH P:.TIPCSES FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL £ : D..N 2s . 2. WALK STREETS REDUCE. VEHICLE TRAFFIC AND ADD ro T WOULD NOT DISTURB THE STATUS OF EVEN UNE WALK S'IP•t_T. HeriEVER, 1 AM RELUCTANT TO '?AGAPE LA'm TO ANY INC.IVIDUAL PR,.; yEYT ' '„PNEP.. UNLESS THERE IS 1044 ASSURANCE THAT UNDER.NO CIRCLMS'IANC E J ZHE LAND EVER AGAIN 3E USED FOR STREETS OR OTHER RIGhWAY3, Fen SAFET P:74POSES, OR OTHER OPEN -SPACE PURPOSES !FOR INSTANCE. WHERE THERE IS A PAVED STREET WITH INSTALLED CURBS) . 3. CAN THE r::TY RENT OUT CITY -OWNED 3i's Z:E PROPERTY ? 1 PERcEI `, E NC OBSTACLES. PA.RTI:''; ,ARUM WHi nE 'i : N.•'C LV DESIR.;B:2 PROPERTY !'TEAR THE ' ATER' S EDGE. 3FAR. IN MI,i0 .` 1'OT ONLY :;:.ES THE CITY OWN 22 FEET ON SCTH $ I.'`.E S CF EA'`H 4.1: LA STREET, TrE CITY ALSO OWNS A STRIP OP 6 FET ALL ALONG ^ :E STAID. 2 . 1• THE CITY IS AND SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE OWNER OF ALL OF THE USED FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY PURPOSES, EVEN STREETS THAT BECOME WALK STREETS. P,TRSONAliR$CO1 ND 'IONS; 1. THE CI'TY-WIDE Pp- :�: NGS PLA A WITH Q PC3LSC %CN SI 1I ST SPE EDI_ COUNCIL SHOULD LOOK FOR A CITY -;SIDE SOLUTION TO A BY APPOINTING A SELE;.'T COMMITTEE TO FORMJLA•I'F A CITY, USING SPECIFIC SOLCTIONS FOR SPECIFIC TO THEIR GEOGRAPHICAL ATTRISUTES, WITH A VIEW 1ESERVING OPEN SPACE, ;ND C rY SEAUTir KATION. ?TEE SHALL BE UNABLE TO R AC;i A COMPROMISE THE - -z- BY T'hIS COUNCIL. ' BARRIERS ON BEACH DRIVE SHOULD BE MAINTAINED 'JO 3. A -ULT/-STORY PARKING FACILITY ON THE OLD CCMC;i %.' AVENUE NEAR PIER MAY NEED TO SE CONSTRUCTED '� •'L FROM RESIDENT PARKING PERMITS). 4. OOHS I DERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TOZ` _ C ::i Z FOR PAPKING ON SOME CITY OWNED RIGHTS -Op -WAY BUT AVAILABLE AUT",MOBILES DISPLAYING RESIDENT PERMITS (DIFFEREN?' COLOR F43P RESIDENTS OF DIFFERENT NEIGHBORHOODS). (PEP1•! I, ME`I'ER?L' ONLY TJ PERMITS S. CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO INCREASING THE rZRMIT FZE DRAMATICALLY TO FORCE PROPERTY OWNERS Tf.) U.3E THEIR OaRAOES FOR PARKING: THE CITY DOES NOT NEED TO SGPSIDIZE STORAGE. 6. CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO PENALIZING PROPERTY rw: E.RS WHO FAIL TO PROVIDE MINIMUM PARKING (BY GRADUALLY REDQCIa••G ABILIT" TO RENT OUT HOUSING WITHOUT MINIMUM PARING). .. CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO "MINI" OPEg-SPA^E ?ARRC :iAL,:'.',;IMED BY THE CITY, OR TO RENTING OUT CITY OPEN SPACE TO CWNTRS TO SE USED FOR PARKING AND OTHER EXCL';SI ELY Cr :;1 USES (TO 8E LANDSCAPED AT THE EXPENSE 0? PRC. E T'OWNER: f ' D ' OH ERECT:NG OF STRUCTURES; NOT TO i1@ USED TO � ALCU r AT_ ;� y ' AR..,F. A STRUCTURE CAN BE DEVELOPED ON PROPERTY;, WHILE 2 PcOV_*;•I:,IG ADc QuATE ACCFSS TO THE STRAND FOR POLICE AND AMBULANCE. 8. CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO LIMITING TANDEN ?AZi INc. TO 2 'CARS. 9. CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO ` �L-1.�:�==•G ADEQUATE TIME FOR COMPLIANCE WITH 10. CONSIDERATION SHOULD SE GIVEN TO PLG of dOO;'Lr:G HOUSING UNITS. ALBERT 'HUMANS 3 PROVIDING ENFORCEMENT RESTRICTIONS. RE FORCEFUL L ENFCRCE:IE} T 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE 93 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE CITY CODE TO ALLOW VEHICLE PARKING ON PUBLIC STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE WEST SIDE OF BEACH DRIVE. WHEREAS, the City Council has endeavored to research, investigate, and review matters pertaining to the parking of vehicles on the public right-of-way on the west side of Beach Drive, and WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed numerous voluminous reports from staff, the Planning Commission, and a special City Council/Citizen Subcommittee created by the City Council, and WHEREAS, the City Council seeks to encourage and accomplish beautification of The Strand corridor and to finally resolve the uncertainty concerning the parking of vehicles on the public street right-of-way on the west side of Beach Drive, and WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings: 1. The public street right-of-way on the walk streets outside of the center 16 feet of paved walking area, along and adjacent to the private properties west of Beach Drive and east of The Strand, have been historically controlled, developed, improved and maintained as side yards to the adjacent private properties; and 2. The improvements made by the adjacent property owners to the aforementioned public street right-of-way areas which have been maintained as side yards have generally constituted a mutual benefit to the City, the Strand 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 neighborhood, and the adjacent residential property owners, and the City wishes to encourage and accomplish future maintenance and beautification of such side yard areas by the adjacent property owners; and 3. Parking of vehicles has occurred on the aforementioned side yard areas between Beach Drive and The Strand for many decades, and many private properties were planned and developed, with City approval, on the premise that such parking is permissible; and 4. The parking of unlimited vehicles upon the entire side yard areas, up to and adjacent to The Strand, constitutes an unacceptable blight upon The Strand corridor; and 5. The elimination of all parking of the subject side yard areas would be unjust to the adjacent property owners who have developed, improved, and maintained said side yard areas, including parking areas, with the knowledge and consent of the City, and would further cause hardship on the entire neighborhood by the elimination of parking spaces, thereby increasing the demand for the inadequate parking spaces available on Hermosa Avenue and other nearby streets; and 6. Many problems and disputes arise from the uncertainty concerning permissible parking on the subject side yard areas, and the City is compelled to determine and announce a compromise plan which adequately balances the competing interests and concerns of its impacted residents; and 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7. The adjacent property owners assert that they have exercised dominion and control over the aforementioned side yard areas for many decades, and that the City's only legal interest in the subject areas was to develop such areas as a public street. The adjacent property owners assert that they have, by law and equity, acquired property rights to the subject areas, which they have developed, improved, and maintained at considerable expense, with the knowledge of the City. The City denies that it has abandoned or compromised its legal interest in the subject areas, or that the adjacent property owners have acquired any cognisable property rights as a result of their historical use, control, and maintenance. However, the City and the impacted property owners seek a resolution of current disputes, and an elimination of the current uncertainty. It is intended that the Ordinance set forth hereinbelow will accomplish a lasting resolution and clarification of the situation. However, by this Ordinance, neither the City nor the adjacent property owners shall be deemed to have abandoned or compromised any of the their legal or equitable rights or arguments which they may have up to and including 1992. Specifically, by this Ordinance, the City does not concede that the adjacent property owners have any legal right to the subject areas. Moreover, however, by participating in the encroachment permit process contemplated hereinbelow, the adjacent property owners 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 shall not have forsaken their factual, legal, and equitable rights and arguments that they are the legal owners of the subject areas, and/or that the City is without the power and legal authority to require such encroachment permits or to otherwise execute dominion and control over the subject side yard areas. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN THAT: SECTION 1. Section 29-38(2) is hereby amended to add the following subsections: e. The public walk street right-of-way outside of the center 16 feet of paved walking area may be used for private use by the adjacent residential property owner through the use of an encroachment permit; f. The adjacent residential property owners west of Beach Drive and east of The Strand may be allowed to continue the parking of vehicles on the public walk street right- of-way if they apply for an encroachment permit, provided that they shall fulfill the conditions of the permit within 120 days of the issuance of the encroachment permit; g. The conditions of the encroachment permit for the public walk street right-of-way areas west of Beach Drive and east of The Strand are as follows: /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Parking shall be allowed only within a distance of 30 feet west of Beach Drive, except for those properties whereupon "substantial compliance" has been accomplished by the adjacent residential property owner prior to December 31, 1992, by defining the parking area with a permanent barrier not more than 35 feet west of Beach Drive. 2. The adjacent residential property owner to whom the encroachment permit is granted shall purchase and maintain a public liability insurance policy applicable to the side yard/encroachment area, with a policy limit of not less than $500,000.00, for which the City of Hermosa Beach is named and and maintained as an "additional insured". Such adjacent private property owner to whom the encroachment permit is granted shall at all times maintain on file with the City of Hermosa Beach current proof of such insurance coverage. 3. A minimum of 1/3 of the side yard/encroachment area shall be landscaped and maintained by the adjacent residential property owner. 4. The required landscaping shall be in place, and the subject side yard/encroachment area shall be neat, clean, and in good order, prior to the issuance of the encroachment permit, and such landscaping and good order shall be maintained at all times by the adjacent residential property owner. This 5 1 2 3 4 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ordinance contemplates a quid pro quo, whereby the adjacent property owner shall continue to enjoy the private use of the subject side yard area, but in exchange therefore, shall bear the responsibility for landscaping and maintaining such side yard area in an attractive, neat, and clean condition. 5. A permanent barrier shall be installed and maintained between the approved parking area and the remainder of the side yard/encroachment area. 6. All vehicular access to the side yard/encroachment area shall be from Beach Drive only. 7. The parking is for passenger vehicles only. Trucks (excepting non-commercial pick-up trucks), motorhomes, campers, boats, trailers, etc., are prohibited. 8. The parking of passenger vehicles permitted herein does not allow for the storage of disabled or unused vehicles. Parking of a passenger vehicle shall not exceed 15 continuous days. 9. An adjacent property owner who applies for an encroachment permit as contemplated herein shall pay a reasonable fee to the City to cover the actual costs of processing the application and issuing the encroachment permit. The City shall not seek to generate revenue by the encroachment permit contemplated herein, but shall only seek reimbursement to the City of actual costs of 6 i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 administration. Applications during 1993 for the encroachment permit contemplated herein shall be accompanied by the payment of a $300.00 fee. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after sixty (60) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 3. That the City Council does hereby designate the City Attorney to prepare a summary of this Ordinance to be published pursuant to the Government Code Section 36933(c) (1) in lieu of the full text of said Ordinance. That prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// 7 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1993. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: 41:ordinanc.par 8 CITY ATTORNEY Date: 2/8/1993 a — 9 — g3, To: City Council From: Steve Suard, Planning Commissioner Re: Vehicle Parking on Public Rights -of -Way The Planning Commission requested that you reconsider its recommendation because the special City Council committee's proposal is in direct conflict with both the recent Advisory Vote on Bulk (which requested less bulk and more restrictive housing development standards including parking requirements) and the draft Land Use Element from which I shall quote the relevant goal: "To preserve public open space throughout the city." If the t',.o proposals went to a city-wide vote, the PC proposal wouldcertainly win by a large margin. Why? Because it contains all three essential features: 1. adheres to both the City's adopted goals and citizen voted mandates, 2. mitigates the parking hardship in the area while at the same time gradually return the land to its aesthetic purpose, and 3. is equitabl='t to all parties. The democratic majority and fairness. takes priority over special interests and greed. The premise of the Planning Commission proposal is that open space increases the desirability of the area in thelong run by keeping density down and maximizing aesthetics and quaintness. This increases property values, as shown by Manhattan Beach. Their right-of-ways should be our models; however, the CC committee has spent 6 months and have not even contacted Manhattan Beach to see how they deal with theirs. The Committee spent their whole time with the group that has a vested financial interest. I could better understand this if the proposed action would put an undue financial hardship on a financially disadvantaged group; however, this is not the case here. Specifically, the PC proposal contains an amortized phase-out of the parking over a generous period (15 years). (you may consider a different time -period; however, the City should retain the authority to revoke the parking as desired sometime in the future). During the amortized period, much can be done to correct the parking problem; for example, new homes with sufficient spaces will be replacing the older parking -deficient ones, city residential parking permits can be limited to only those residents who qualify for them based on need and not those who have abundant spaces (i.e., new homes) or those who use their garages for living space, etc. The CC plan permanently gives up City open space without any provision for returning it back to open space in the future when the parking situation is mitigated. The CC committee spent considerable time on this and (a) did not even incorporate a parking study to determine the possibility of other options available to mitigate the parking situation, and (b) split an already small sub -study group into yet a smaller one differenciating now between east and west Beach Drive. The PC plan has a mechanism for fair reimbursement to the City by the adjacent property owner if they decide to use the two temporarily available parking spaces. The amount is to be decided by City Council. We recommend that it be done on a yearly permit basis at a low monthly rate per space (say 50% of its market rate or market rate lees market rate of a gardener for the site). This method takes into account (a) the owners willingness to cooperate with the City and make both the City and the owner's residence a more beautiful place to live, and (b) the City's right to fair compensation. Those who have previously obtained a City permit for their parking improvements could be given an additional reduction or waiver. The CC plan has a one time fee which only covers administration costs and has no bearing on the quantity of parking use or its value, and is, therefore, not fair. If you are going to allow a parking lot on the right-of-way, it would not be equitable to allow only the adjacent owners to park if the whole area is impacted as the CC plan hypothesizes. A more equitable and cost effective use of the same space would be to expand the permits to other area owners or put in parking meters so the neighbors could use the spaces too. That way, utilization would be maximized and those that get the benefit pay for it. (The few parking spaces granted by Manhattan Beach on thier right-of-ways are public, not private, and they charge $75 for an encroachment permit without parking involved) We realize some owners, not all, have taken the risk (and I emphasize "risk") to take advantages of City property for many years. They should appreciate the delicacy and equitable manner in which their concerns have been taken into account in the City's attempt to return the land to its intended use (which is landscaping alongside of a pedestrian thorough -fare). We are also aware that this delicacy has been necessitated by the fact that the City has been lax in enforcing its laws. Nonetheless, the City cannot be responsible for the risk taken by private individuals. These individuals should be grateful that their risk has paid off as well as it has. Most have had the opportunity to park on that land without additional cost or obligation for a long time. They have also recieved fair value for their investment, and will continue to enjoy its many, but more limited, uses in the future. Over the weekend I was called by a City Councilmember who proceeded to try to convince me of the CC proposal by making statements which you would expect that anyone in their position would have known were false or at the very least should not have touted as fact but rather their opinion. For example, the Councilmember stated that the City is currently out of compliance with the terms of the right- of-way dedication by having the side -yard area as open space rather than thorough -fare, and, therefore, the Strand owners could force the City to "vacate" the property. (this is not true as any thorough -fare can have landscaped areas) The Councilmember said the City could not legally put meters on this property (which City staff assures me could be done with Coastal Commission approval). The Councilmember did not feel that the bulk advisory vote dealt with parking when the last two words in Proposition J read: "parking requirements". The Councilmember explained to me that the most volatile topic in the City was parking, and there was more reason to fear a special interest group representing parking than the silent majority. We understand that the City Council must deal with many pressures from: (a) the monetary motivation of the owners in wanting to both use the land for free and sell that right to another owner, to (b) the political clout carried by some of these same individuals, for example, an ex -City mayor, etc., and (c) the constant threat of lawsuits by influential lawyers and recalls from any adversely affected parties. But as responsible City officials we can not give in to these pressures as it goes against all City goals, mandates, and ethics. Already we have special interests clamoring for recall on two issues on which you are supported by the popular vote of the people. We cannot now give them something they can legitimately hang you for by going against the wishes of the City majority. In summary, there are other more effective and equitable ways to solve parking problems and at the same time work toward returning the City's land to its intended aesthetic use without permanently giving up its open space to a special few for far too little reimbursement. Remember we are talking about permanently committing City land which is comparable to the Biltmore site for no significant reimbursement from those who can afford to pay for the benefit. The Planning Commission is completely committed to resolving this issue and will do what it has to do to work with you to achieve an appropriate solution to this problem. Honorable Mayor aAd Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 2, 1993 Regular Meeting of February 9, 1993 AWARD OF BID FOR THE STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH Recommendation: It is recommended that he City Council authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with EMMA CORPORATION, 11545 West Olympic Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90064 for the following project: Reconstruct Strand Pavement Reconstruct Poured -in-place Wall with Slightly Rounded Top Electroliers and Trash Receptacle Wall -mounted Street Names Recessed into Wall Total Cost is $659,100. Background: On December 15, 1993 the City Council authorized the solicitation of bids on the project with provision for certain alternates. The base bid included the following: 1. Basics: Saw Cutting existing pavement Removing existing pavement Removing existing wall Installing electrical conduit Placing striping Constructing handicap ramps 2. Constructing new pavement 3. Constructing new wall The engineer's base bid estimate is $956,880* The low bid contractor's base bid is $587,880 The alternates (additions or changes to the base bid) included the following: Street names on the wall Precast concrete wall Wall -mounted electroliers Wall -mounted trash receptacles Alternate rounded top * Actual estimates are surprisingly low. They are complete and do not overlook any portion of the project. Our Engineer's project cost estimate was performed using industry cost data from several current sources. Each source produced similar cost data. Nevertheless, actual bids came in considerably below our projections, very possibly as a product of the area's recession driven slow down in heavy construction and hungry contractors eager for any work. Analysis: The City received 19 bids and these have been shown on a matrix in three general classifications. POURED IN PLACE WALL (POINTED TOP) Wall, Pavement & Basics POURED IN PLACE WALL (POINTED TOP) Wall, Pavement, Basics & Alternates POURED IN PLACE WALL (ROUND TOP) Wall, Pavement & Basics POURED IN PLACE WALL (ROUND TOP) Wall, Pavement, Basics & Alternates PRECAST WALL (POINTED OR ROUND TOP) Wall, Pavement & Basics PRECAST WALL (POINTED OR ROUND TOP) Wall, Pavement, Basics & Alternates The array was made based on placing the lowest base bids in the left column and graduating the base bids across to the right in increasing order. An inspection of the Matrix indicates that EMMA CORP. was low bidder on both alternate combinations in which the poured in place wall was used. EXCALIBUR CONTRACTING, INC. was low bidder on the precast wall, with or without alternates. Both contractors have an A license, have done work of the same order of magnitude as our project and reference checks from former clients are highly favorable. Alternative: Award the contract to EXCALIBUR CONTRACTING, INC. 20541 Pascal Way, Lake Forest, CA 92630 for the following project: Reconstruct Strand pavement Reconstruct precast wall with slightly rounded top Electroliers and trash receptacles wall -mounted Street names recessed into wall Total Cost is $702,010. This project is not recommended as an alternate for the following reasons: 1. The precast wall costs $42,910 more than the cast -in-place wall. The only difference is that it will have a smoother finish than the cast in place wall. 2. The wall will have discontinuity approximately every 20 feet (casting length) and although a keyed joint will be used, the individual sections may be subject to minor misalignment as the wall ages. 3. Inspection time will be increased due to the additional site (casting yard) to be inspected. 4. Slight casting errors can occur which will not be detected until the wall is delivered & put in place. 5. It may be very difficult to control the placement of the wall with the steel dowels meeting the grout holes, the wall settling to the right depth in the mortar and the keyways aligning properly before the mortar and grout set up. Attachments: Low -bid contractor's proposals. Summary of bids with alternate combinations. Res ly Su fitted, ,, Conc»r: Charles McDon Director of Public Works Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance ty/cmaward ,,)10 Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager • Q. S E. PART 5 • PROPOSAL .CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIP 90-144, STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH it TO THE CITY COUNCIL -0F THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH .The undersigned, as bidder,declares that: (1)this l g proposal is made without collusion with any other person, firm or corpora- tion, and that the only persons or parties interested as prin- cipals are those named herein; y (2) bidder has carefully examined the project specifications, 'instructions to bidders, 'proposal, ':notice to bidders and all other information furnished therefore; (3) bidder has investigated and is satisfied as to the conditions, the character, quality and quantities of work to be performed and materialsto be furnished. . Furthermore, bidder agrees that sub- mission of this proposal shall be conclusive evidence that such examination and investigation have been made and agrees,in the event this contract be awarded to bidder, to enter into a contract with the City of Hermosa Beach, to perform said proposed work in accordance with the plans, if any, and the terms of the specifica- tions, in the time and manner therein prescribed, and to furnish 'or provide all materials, labor, ,tools, equipment, apparatus and other means necessary so to do, except such thereof as may other- wise be furnished or provided under the terms of said specifica- tions, for the following stated unit prices or lump sum price as submitted on the Schedule A attached hereto. The bidder shall submit as part of this proposal a completed copy of the Non -Collusion Affidavit. -40- • The undersigned further agrees that should he be awarded the contract on the basis hereof and thereafter defaults in executing the required contract within ten (10) days not including Sundays' and legal holidays after having received notice that the con'trac�" . has been awarded and is ready for signature, this pro•osal" th-d-t'he'' acceptance thereof may be considred null and void. ,; �'.�%'� ��,; of Bidder ,:, ' -_I>. '.? �� lj� J. . YACKL Y, PRESI . ENT % t;�/ -� , ;I. rmull . If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co- -partners composing the firm. =If a corporation, state legal name ::of corporation, also names of president, secretary, treasurer, and, manager thereof. Two notarized officer's signatures and the cor- porate seal are required for corporations. ....:...:..: Signature(s) '.J.P:l. YAC'(i EY, PSESIDENT J.M. YAC L;EV, SECRrU=TARY Legal Business Name: Address: EXCALIBUR CONTRACTING, INC. • Phone: Date: STATE OF CALIF IA COUNTY OF OFFICIAL SEAL JOY L. NELSON NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA ORANGE COUNTY My Comm Expires May 6. 1994 , ACKNOWLEDGMENT—Corp.—Pres. 8 Sec.—Wolcotts Form 222CA—Rev. 11-83 ©1983 WOLCOTTS. INC. (price class 8-2) }SS. On this .7-1?" day of Vk MZk . ( in the year 10S before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and or said State, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis ot atisfactory evidence) to be thq persons who executed the within instrument as -Vile, President. and')Secretary, respectively, of -the Corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that the Corporation executed it pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its board of directors. WITNESS my hand and official ,blit in and f: r said State. CONTRACTOR'S INDUSTRIAL SAFETY RECORD ,This information must include all construction work undertaken in the State of California by the bidder, partnership, joint venture or cor- � `' oration that any y principal of the bidder participated in as a principal or owner for the last five calendar years and the current calendar year prior to the date of bid submittal. Separate information shall be sub- mitted for each particular partnership, joint venture, corporate or in- dividual bidder. ,..The bidder may attach any additional information or explanation of data which he would like taken into consideration in evaluating the safety record. ' An explanation must be attached of the circumstances surrounding any and all fatalities. Record Last Five (5) Full Years YEAR OF RECORD . No. of contracts . Total dollar amount of contracts (in thousands of %) *3. No. of fatalities *4. No. of lost workday cases *5. No. of lost workday cases involving permanent transfer to another job or termination of em- ployment *6. No. of lost workdays 19 19•M / 19'0 11. 1911 Ss—Ivt ;ll ipw. 13 !0 Mc 1t TOTAL rte: 1t1e1. CURRENT YEAR 3 )0( >or *The information required for these items is the same as. -:required 'for ..'columns 3 to 6, Code 10, Occupational Injuries, Summary --Occupational •" Ttninricc =m,i T11m a_a ^CVA M.. Inn r1 STATE OF CALIFORNI COUNTY OF OFFICIAL SEAL JOY L. NELSON NOTARY PU3LIC CALIFORNIA ORANGE COUNTY My Comm Expires May 6. 1994 i ACKNOWLEDGMENT—Corp.—Pres. & Sec.—Wolcotts Form 222CA—Rev. 11-83 ©1983 WOLCOTTS. INC. (price class 8-21 On this e Cir day of A�.LL.(_I-t,/ in the year 19 before me, the under igned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared c�. M , Li k L`\ and personally known to me (or proved to me on the bass of atisfactory evidence) to be th sersons who executed the within instrument as President and I` Secretary, respectively, of the Corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that the Corporation executed it pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its board of directors. WITNESS my hand and official seal. I' KNOWN ALL _PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT: That we-,- -EXCALIBUR-CONTRACTING, INC. as Principal and: _ DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Hermosa Beach in the sum of TEN PERCENT OF BID AMOUNT $( 10% OF BID--) dollars,to be .: '.::� paid to the said City or its certain attorneys, its suc cessors and assigns; for the payment of which sum, well and truly made,,` we bind-ourseives, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors ._ ._or_assigns,_jointly, and severally,__firmly by these present. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH: That - is= the= certain proposal of the above bounden EXCALIBUR CONThACr1NG, 1NC. to THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 'dated JANUARY 28 , 19 93 , . is accepted} by_.the City of Hermosa Beach, and if the above bounden EXCALIBUR CONTRACTING, INF. his heirs, executors, administrators, ' successors and assigns,shall duly enter into and execute a contract for such equipment -,=-ands bi-Fl execute and deliver the two bonds described within ten days _(not- =including Sunday) , from the date of the mailing of a notice to-_ theL above bounden EXCALIBUR CONTRACTING, INC. by and- _fxonr the =said City of Hermosa Beach that said contract is ready for execution, then this obligation shall become null and void; other- wise it shall be and remain in full force and virtue. Intheevent any suit, action or proceeding is instituted to recover on this bond or obligation, said Surety will pay, and does hereby agree to pay, as attorney's fees for said City, such sum as the Court in any. --such suit, action or proceeding mav--adiudae reasonable - - `1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA I COUNTY OF (:)\` rviAl FO OFFICIAL SEAL 10Y 1. NELSON NOTARY PU?L(C CALIFORNIA ORANGE COUNTY My Comm Expires May 6,1994 ACKNOWLEDGMENT—Corp.—Pres. & Sec.-Wolcotts Form 222CA—Rev. 11-83 01983 WOLCOTTS. INC. (price class 8-2) On this rt‘day of 6- Kt /Ln,4 in the year 19(15, before me, the undersjgned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared and , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of i�tisfactory evidence) to be the persons who executed the within instrument as J'fl . President and E Secretary, respectively, of the Corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that the Corporation executed it pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its board of erectors. WITNESS my hand and official s for said State. POWER OF ATTORNEY OF INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA N2 099598 AND DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY P.O. BOX 19725. IRVINE, CA 92713 • (714) 263-3300 iCE: 1. All power and authority herein granted shall in any event terminate on the•3lst day of March. 1993. 2. This Power of Attorney is void it altered or if any portion is erased. 3. This Power of Attorney is void unless the seal is readable. the text is in brown ink. the signatures are in blue ink and this notice is in red in 4. This Power of Attorney should not be returned to the Attorneyjsl-In-Fact, but should remain a permanent part of the obiioee's recorg.s. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that, except as expressly limited, INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, do each severally, but not jointly, hereby make, constitute and appoint ***MICHAEL A. QUIGLEY*** the true and lawful Attorney(s)-In-Fact, to make, execute, deliver and acknowledge, for and on behalf of each of said corporations as sureties, bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship in an amount not exceeding One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars (51.500,000) in any single undertaking; giving and granting unto said Attorney(s)-In-Fact full power and authority to do and to perform every act necessary, requisite or proper to be done in connection therewith as each of said corporations could do, but reserving to each of said corporations full power of substitution and revocation; and all of the acts of said Attorney(s)-In-Fact. pursuant to these presents. are hereby ratified and confirmed. The authority and powers conferred by this Power of Attorney do not extend to any of the following bonds, undertakings or contracts of suretyship: Bank depository bonds, mortgage deficiency bonds, mortgage guarantee bonds. guarantees of installment paper, note guarantee bonds, bonds on financial institutions, lease bonds, insurance company qualifying bonds, self -insurer's bonds, fidelity bonds or bail bonds. This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolutions adopted by the respective Boards of Directors of INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, effective as of September 24, 1986: RESOLVED, that the Chairman of the Board, the President and any Vice President of the corporation be, and that each of them hereby is, authorized to execute Powers of Attorney, qualifying the attorney(s) named in the Powers of Attorney to execute, on behalf of the corporation, bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship; and that the Secretary or any Assis- tant Secretary of the corporation be, and each of them hereby is, authorized to attest the execution of any such Power of Attorney; RESOLVED, FURTHER, that the signatures of such officers may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures shall be valid and binding upon the corporation when so affixed and in the future with respect to any bond, undertaking or • contract of suretyship to which it is attached. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY have severally caused these presents to be signed by their respec- tive Presidents and attested by their respective Secretaries this 1st day of April, 1992. INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA By ATTEST By Dant F. Vincenti, Jr. resident Walter Crowell Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY By ATTEST By Dante) . Vincenti, Jr. resident .d/47iref Walter Crowell Secretary On April 1, 1992. before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Dante F. Vincenti. Jr. and Walter Crowell, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons who executed the within instrument as President and Secretary on behalf of Indemnity Company of California and as President and Secretary on behalf of Developers Insurance Company. the Corporations therein named. and acknowledged to me that the corporations executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature iYg � 7 �t� Notary Public CERTIFICATE OFFICIAL SEAL TIR ESA TAAFUA NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN ORANGE COUNTY My Commission Exp. Aug. 4, 1995 The undersigned, as Senior Vice President of INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, and Senior Vice President of DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, does hereby certify that the foregoing and attached Power of Attorney remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore, that the provisions of the resolutions of the respective Boards of Directors of said corporations set forth in the Power of Attorney. are in force as of the date of this Certificate. This Certificate is executed in the City of Irvine, California. this 11TH day of JANUARY 199 3 INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA By L.C.-Fiebiger Senior Vice President ID -310 REV. 3/92 DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY By L.C. Fiebiger Senior Vice President CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STATE OF CALIFORNIA NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT The undersigned in submitting a bid for performing the following work by contract, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That he has not, either directly or indirectly, entered into any agree- ment, participated in any collusion, or otherwise taken any action in restraint of free competitive bidding in connection with such contract. City Project Name: CIP 90-144, STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEESTRIAN''PATH•,,,,� 20541 PASCAL WAY LAKE FOREST, CA 92G30 Business Address •,%• • + . ' r r J.M. YACKLEY, PRESIDENT' ,,,,,,,'',,•-; Signature of Bidder'',,,,,,�I, Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Ji .vurue.y Mvr ['nmm i ac i nn gwvinirtmc. Not of /Lm Il'1Av C' public inand or the County angeles, State of California STATE OF CALIFORNII. COUNTY OF ` I�(C i OFFICIAL SEAL. 10Y L NE1SO)1 NOTA:<v PU,.I(, CPL:FCRt I ORANGE COUNT' My Comm Expires May 6, 1994 ACKNOWLEDGMENT—Corp.—Pres. & Sec.—Wolcoils Form 222CA—Rev. 11-83 ©1983 WOLCOTTS. INC. once class 8-21 On this day of (. )a-Mv ECS ( in the year 19 before me, the undersi ned,Notary Public in and or said State, personally appeared .111.aIv{r, t anH personally known to me (or proved to me on the a 's of satisfactory evidence) to b�e,t a persons who executed the within instrument as President and—tis—c..— Secretary, respectively, of.the Corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that the Corporation executed it pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its board of directors. WITNESS my hand and offic al seal. No dry Public i and for said State: BASE BID BID PROPOSAL TO CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONTRACT FOR CIP 90-144, STRAND. BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH EXCALIBUR CONTRACTING, INC. Bidder's Name ITEM NO. ITEM APPROX. QUANTITY UNIT OF MEASURE UNIT PRICE (IN FIGURES) TOTAL DOLLARS (IN FIGURES) 1 2 3 4Z 5 6 7. 8 Saw cut existing pavement Remove existing P.C.C. Pavement Remove existing concrete block masonry wall Construct 7.5" P.C.C. pavement Construct reinforced P.C.C. wall Construct Handicap access ramps Install 2" conduit, pull boxes and pull conductors Install striping 5,100 102,000 6,500 102,000 6,500 3 .. 5,000 L.F. S.F. L.F. S.F L.F. EA. L.F. L.S. $ 1.00 $ S JOD • oO $ ' SS-$ _ g(o) 7oo.c �' 5• L{5 S',1::.(5: .P $ D•1 -r �Lni IaO• $ 3g-• SD $ DA;-)S2)•� $(P00.00 $ ))1 OCA CO $ --$ ) , CO 3S',c�y>.00 $ `1)Q00•Do $ Li) abb•ot GRAND TOTAL $ 69g10,11'd•m bikeway2 +(8 JAN231993 sign t Cffy Clerk � City of Harmoss Beach ^f•�/ • • T tT ► \ • —45— A KLEY; PRESIDgNT I ALTERNATE BID PROPOSAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONTRACT FOR CIP 90-144, STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH :-- EXCALIBUR CONTRACTING, INC. Bidder's Name ITEM NO. - ITEM APPROX. QUANTITY UNIT OF MEASURE UNIT PRICE (IN FIGURES) TOTAL DOLLARS (IN FIGURES) 1 Install Street Names on wall L. S . -• 0 DO $ S -,T1) • 41)cd SW -0J010 2 Construct Reinforced Precast Concrete Wall 6,500 L.F. ce3S.SID 2_10) "7 Sb, zo 3 Construct Reinforced Combination Wall Mounted Electrolier and Trash Receptacle for Cast -in - Place Place Wall 30 EA. It:00 1 i ) 0.00 %-ld'OC O. DO • 4 Construct Reinforced Combination Wall Mounted Electrolier and Trash Receptacle for Precast Concrete Wall 30 EA. '.1 I DO .tDO J $• .2.3, t 5 Construct Wall Mounted Electrolier for Cast -in -Place Wall 6 EA. •tj&r).- .”--)1 Ve;5(009•C° 6 Construct Wall Mounted Electrolier for Precast Concrete Wall 6 EA. "V) I DO .00-.J.V0 ) ke2ro.ot 7 Construct Cast -in -Place Wall with Alternate A Top . 6,500 L.F. 4,31-6-0 t 0,)-4/ aso /. bikeway3 v v Signat re 444.Y CkLaY, PRESIDENT : y , 1 H -46- PART 5 PROPOSAL `CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STATE OF CALIFORNIA CIP 90-144, STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH The undersigned, as bidder, declares that. (1) this proposal is made without collusion with any other person, firm or corpora- tion, and that the only persons or parties interested as prin-;':'uh cipals are those named herein; (2) bidder has carefully examined the project specifications, instructions to bidders, proposal, notice to bidders and all other information furnished therefore; (3) bidder has investigated and is satisfied as to the conditions,:; the character, quality and quantities of work to be performed and ;materials to be furnished. Furthermore, bidder agrees that sub- mission of this proposal shall be conclusive evidence that such examination and investigation have been made and agrees, in the :_event this contract be awarded to bidder, to enter into a contract with the City of Hermosa Beach, to perform said proposed work in accordance with thelans if any, y, and the terms of the specifica- tions, in the time and manner therein prescribed, and to furnish or provide all materials, labor, tools, equipment, apparatus and other means necessary so to do, except such thereof as may other- wise be furnished or provided under the terms of said specifica- tions, for the following stated unit prices or lump sum price as submitted on the Schedule A attached hereto. `The bidder shall submit as part ofthis proposal 'a cpmpleted. copy of the Non -Collusion Affidavit. -40- ��'"fig d_.. M x• `i' The undersigned further agrees that should he be awarded the contract on the basis hereof and thereafter defaults in executing the required contract within ten (10) days not including Sundays and legal holidays after having received notice that the contract has been awarded and is ready for signature, this proposal and the acceptance thereof may be considred null and void. Signature(s) of Bidder If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co- partners composing the firm. :_If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, also names of president, secretary, treasurer,`:' and manager thereof. ,Two notarized officer's signatures and the cor- porate seal are required for corporations. Legal Business Name: ;::Phone : Date: CONTRACTOR'S INDUSTRIAL SAFETY RECORD This information must include all construction work undertaken in the State of California by the bidder, partnership, joint venture or cor- poration that any principal of the bidder participated in as a principal or owner for the last five calendar years and the current calendar year prior to the date of bid submittal. Separate information shall be sub- mitted for each particular partnership, joint venture, corporate or in .dividual bidder. The bidder may attach any additional information or explanation of data which he would like taken into consideration in evaluating the safety record. An explanation must be attached of the circumstances surrounding and all fa Record Last Five (5) Full. Years YEAR OF RECORD 1. No. of contracts 2. Total dollar amount of. contracts (in. thousands of %) *3. No. of fatalities *4. No. of lost workday cases *5. No. of lost workday cases involving permanent transfer to another job or termination of em- ployment - *6. No. of lost workdays 19 St 6 3,800 19 81 6 ®- 19R0 19'71 Z,yt2 6 - • 19etZ 3- e13 - TOTAL CURRENT YEAR I C ('13 *The information required for these items is the same as _required for. columns 3 to 6, Code 10, Occupational Injuries, Summary --Occupational Injuries and Illnesses, OSHA No. 102. The above information was compiled from the records that are available Ito me at this time and I declare under penalty of .. perjury that the in- formation is true and accurate within the limitations of those records. E1-fr{,4 Co,PF. Name of Bidder (print) Signature t» yr to, otr-f Bir) Address 4c8 2 3 Telephone • PROPOSAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STATE OF CALIFORNIA • BIDDER'S BOND KNOWN ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT: .That we, as Principal, and as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Hermosa Beach the sum of dollars, to be paid to the said City or its certain attorneys,. its suc` cessors and assigns; for the payment of which sum, well and trulymade we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, �'`''' or assigns, jointly and severally, firmlybythese 'successors present • THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH: That is the certain proposal of the above bounden to THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH dated • ,:is accepted by the City of Hermosa Beach, and if the above bounden , his heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, shall duly enter into and execute a contract for such equipment, and shall execute and deliver the two bonds described within ten days (not including Sunday), from the date of the mailing of a notice to the above bounden by and from the said City of Hermosa Beach that said contract is ready for execution, then this obligation shall become null and void; other- wise it shall be and remain in full force and virtue. In the event any suit, action or proceeding is instituted to recover on this bond or obligation, said Surety will pay, and does hereby agree to pay, as attorney's fees for said:. City,.. such sum as theCourt in any. such suit, action or proceeding may adjudge reasonable. EXECUTED , SEALED AND DATED this day of , 19 ___ . INCIPAL ..:::........... SURETY -43- • tl CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT , Y p The undersigned in submittinga bid for work performing the following work by contract, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That he has not, either directly or indirectl agree- ment, participated in any collusion, or otherwiset takeeredn anyo any action in restraint of free competitive bidding in connection with such contract. City Project Name CIP 90-144, STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH fM0!4 • `CeeP. liril w 6EYtarA` Rw Sig J7 re of Bidder Business Address cts. CLOS ANGELES COUNTY � 6/yr Comm. Expires Sept 19, 1595 OFFICIALSEAL, GCSE CASfl!iO Notary Public in and for the County of Los Angeles, State of California My Commission expires g Iq , 19q BASE BID • _ . ---7BID PROPOSAL TO CITY_OFHERMOSA BEACH STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONTRACT FOR ,- CIP 90-144, STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH ITEM NO. 1 2 3 . 4 5 Saw cut existing pavement • Remove existing P.C.C. Pavement T " 4 Remove existing concrete block masonry wall . Construct 7.5" P.C.C. pavement Construct reinforced P.C.C. wall • Construct Handicap access ramps Install 2" conduit, pull boxes and pull conductors Install striping . _ . . APPROX. QUANTITY 5,100 102,000 6,500 - 102,000 6,500 3 5,000 UNIT OF 'MEASURE S.F. L.F. S.F •EA. L.F. L.S. PRICE (IN FIGURES) TOTAL DOLLARS (IN FIGURES) •$ 612,o $ Z.e>o $ Z.80 $ C7o $ lZ1o00 $ 8 1,4 o - , . $ 13,00o.- $ ZSCAoo $ /'t7, cro ) bikeway2 - GRAND TOTAL $ 587 880,7 CIP 90-144, STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH t`tHA rv2P62.407.15z Bidder's Name ITEM NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Install Street Names on wall ..:i:;::.; APPROX. QUANTITY Construct Reinforced Precast Concrete Wall Construct Reinforced Combination Wall Mounted Electrolier and Trash Receptacle for Cast -in - Place Wall 6,500 UNIT OF MEASURE L.S. L.F. UNIT PRICE (IN FIGURES) TOTAL :DOLLARS (IN FIGURES) Construct Reinforced Combination Wall Mounted Electrolier and Trash Receptacle for Precast Concrete Wall Construct Wall Mounted Electrolier for Cast -in -Place Wall 30 EA. ,13S.- Z, Boa Construct Wall Mounted Electrolier for Precast Concrete Wall Construct Cast -in -Place Wall with Alternate A Top EA. L.F. 138,4Sb,"' ifD itContinental nsurance„ BID BOND 4 Approved by The American Institute of Architects, A.I.A. Document No. A-310 (Feb. 1970 Edition) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we EMMA CORPORATION as Principal, hereinafter called the Principal, and FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY of BREA, CALIFORNIA a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of NEW JERSEY , as Surety, hereinafter called the Surety, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH in the sum of TEN PERCENT OF THE AMOUNT OF THE ACCOMPANYING BID Dollars On , as Obligee, hereinafter called the Obligee, ($ 10% OF BID ), for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, the said Principal and the said Surety, bind our- selves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the Principal has submitted a bid for "STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH" NOW, THEREFORE, if the Obligee shall accept the bid of the Principal and the Principal shall enter into a contract with the Obligee in accordance with the terms of such bid, and give such bond or bonds as may be specified in the bidding or contract documents with good and sufficient surety for the faithful performance of such contract and for the prompt payment of labor and material furnished in the prosecution thereof, or in the event of the failure of the Principal to enter such contract and give such bond or bonds, if the Principal shall pay to the Obligee the difference not to exceed the penalty hereof between the amount specified in said bid and such larger amount for which the Obligee may in good faith contract with another party to perform the work covered by said bid, then this iibligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. \,„„,„,,, Signed and sealed this 15TH day of JANUARY A D 19 93 T (Seal) E STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of ORANGE EMMA CORPORATION Acknowledgment of Principal ; aFICi:;i SEAL !E NN;F HARJUNG NOS ,n FL:2LIC-CALiTCANIAAcknowledgent of Surety (Attorney -in -Fact? : re r,c. n Ct !cE IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY ' My Corn nissian Expires October 22, 1993 On JANUARY 15, 1993 488 before me, JENNIFER HARJUNG (here insert name and title of the officer), personally appeared MICHAEL A. OUIGLEY personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(sj is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/ her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) ac - , ;exec - e " • .. ent. WITNESS my hand and official seal Signature (Seal) I Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY Know all men by these Presents, That the FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY has made, constituted and appointed, and by these presents does make, constitute and appoint Michael A. Quigley of Riverside, California its true and lawful attorney, for it and in its name, place, and stead to execute on behalf of the said Company, as surety, bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship to be given to All Obligees provided that no bond or undertaking or contract of suretyship executed under this authority shall exceed in amount the sum of .Ten Million (10,000,0100) Dollars This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY at a meeting duly called and held on the 13th day of January, 1989: "RESOLVED, that the Chairman of the Board, the Vice Chairman of the Board, the President, an Executive Vice President or a Senior Vice President or a Vice President of the Company, be, and that each or any of them hereby is, authorized to execute Powers of Anomer qualifying the attorney named in the given Power of Attorney to execute in behalf of the FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK. NEW JERSEY, bonds, undertakings and all contracts of suretyship; and that an Assistant Vice President, a Secretary or an Assistant secretary be, and that each or any of them hereby is, authorized to attest the execution of any such Power of Attorney, and to attach thereto the seal of the Company. FURTHER RESOLVED, that the signatures of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power ofAttomey or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company when so affixed and in the future with respect to any bond, undertaking or contract of suretyship to which it is attached." In Witness Whereof, the FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY has caused its official seal to be hereunto affixed, and these presents to be signed by one of its Vice Presidents and attested by one of its Assistant Vice Presidents this day of 19 89 15 December FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY By Attest: D.L Banta, Assistant Vice President STATE. OF CONNECTICUT COUNTY OF HARTFORD 1114 Emil B. Askew, Vice President On thisday of ,19 , before me personally came Emil B. Askew, to me known, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and sal, that he is a Villtertnident ofRe FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal of the said corporation; that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto by like order. ,. ?.mss E4_\\ NOTARY' 1 /� CERTIFICATE GLORIA D. SEEKINS NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires March 31, 1993 I, the undersigned, an Assistant Vice President of the FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, a New Jersey corporation, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached Power of Attorney remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore that the Resolution of the Board of Directors, set forth in the said Power of Attorney, is now in force. Signed and sealed at the town of Farmington, the State of Connecticut. Dated the 15TH da of JANUARY ,19 93 21 BOND 4315E Printed in U.S.A. T/S/E �f'Ti�ANO B/'EiMAY AND PEDE�f' /r/,/1N.-. f'IT// .fY/MMARY DP 8/DS {S'/TH ALTERNATE LOMB/NAT/D/1/.f POURED /N PLACE WALL (PD/NTE8 TDP) Emla CORP E CALIBUR CONT GRIFFITH Co TERRA_ CALP.t er,,y PO,,vvu. RANDOM CoruT. WAKe HAM-aAki8.pERRY/1Ar1Ess , QLERGI CONT. SouTliwITT EN4. SUUYryILLER Co SA✓AID C°NT PREMIER EWA. k.E.C, CO. /IAS1CRS CbNr. DM?oO Cb,rsr cO COPP Co,'T ,00 /ARR' ENT. CGARkE CoNT- KVALL, P,OYEAfewr AND 84.rizJ -1 587, 866 f: 711, 3/0 -11- 790,609 .!I 796, /IL .d 778, GOo Bol 5 -o # 105 2.27 .g 827, z73 4 195,630 4 P9G, 570 1894' 95s ..e 9t7 o/9 1 /, 607, 526, ,NALL nou41ED EG0cTRouOR' ntie, TRntM REcopr,Le t 1,4,056 t 135, oo0 7/, 515 95, too - 31, 210 (al, 483 4+,732 100, 714 'Js aoo 64, 5a0 59too 41`51.9 .' '•' bet 600 2/811 1-lour/TED fLECTROL,ERS ONLY t 9, boo ., .21, oo 3 .35, 702 /5, 7S0 L, 63o /2, 5l.+ 10, 779 12,14o 6, 600 G,000 1/, 400 10,50a P, G/o /; B. J. Mitchell P. O. Box 865 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 January 29, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers, RECEIVED FEB 0 1 1993 CITY MGR. OFFICE I spoke with you at the Council meeting of 1/26 to express my opposition to the expenditure of funds for the upgrading of a "dedicated regional bicycle path" without addressing the safety issues on the Strand by providing for the separation of pedestrians from the vehicular traffic. My letter to the Council explained my reasons for opposing it and made some recommendations for Council action. This letter has two purposes: (1) to correct one of the statistics I quoted at the meeting of January 26, and (2) to repeat my concerns about the legal pitfalls inherent in the Council's plan to formally convert the Strand to a bicycle path, with no provision for pedestrians, particularly the potential financial liability to the City should the plan continue. During my remarks to the Council on the expansion of the Strand to 22 feet as provided in the 1911 deed by the Hermosa Beach Land and Water Company, I stated that the current Strand was 16 feet wide. I was given that figure by someone who was familiar with the Strand controversy, and so I assumed it to be factual. However, when I personally went to the Strand and measured it for myself, I found it to be 20 feet wide at the location where the private homes begin to encroach on the Strand right-of-way. Given that the existing width is 20 feet, only 2 feet would need to be added, rather than the 10 feet I suggested earlier, in order to bring the required concrete walkway to 22 feet. Having visually observed the existing configuration, it is clear that the lighting standards and the trash cans would have to be moved outside of the walkway in order to make room for the separate lanes for pedestrians and vehicular traffic. Otherwise, the 6 feet of Strand now occupied by private walls/patios would have to be recovered by the City. The refusal of the City Council to consider the separation of pedestrians from vehicular traffic, places the City in what I believe to be a very vulnerable legal position. To follow that course may result in the City being in violation of both the deed. restrictions of 1901 and the City's own ordinance No. N.S. 395, enacted in 1970. Should the courts agree with my analysis, the practical result would be that the City might very well have to return to the County the money spent for the conversion of the Strand to a bicycle path. My analysis includes the following points: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 6 The 1901 deed restrictions read as follows: ...Said corporation does hereby dedicate as public pleasure ground all of that portion of the land shown on said plat between the ocean front boundary line and the line of high tide, meaning hereby to dedicate this last described tract as a public pleasure ground and common: thereby meaning to restrict and forever prohibit the use of said pleasure or playground for vehicles, trains, horse wagons, carriages, automobiles, and every other kind of conveyance including cars of every kind. The City Council, through its Ordinance No. 388, interpreted this deed restriction in its municipal code as follows: Sec. 6-8. Riding bicycles on strand or sidewalks. It shall be unlawful for any person to ride or operate any bicycle on or over the strand or any sidewalk on any street in the city. (Ord. No. 388 ssl) On March 21, 1907, The Hermosa Beach_ Land and Water Company dedicated to the City of Hermosa Beach all of the land between the west property line of all lots facing the ocean and the "line of high tide," subject to the condition that all of this property was dedicated as a "public pleasure ground" and to forever restrict and prohibit the use of said pleasure or playground for vehicles. The City Council amended the Municipal Code in 1970, in part, as follows: Riding bicycles on sidewalks. It shall be unlawful for any person to ride or operate any bicycle on or overany sidewalk on any street in the City, with the exception of the Strand walkway subject to the requirements of this chapter. Section 2 details the requirements, in part, as follows: Yield right of way. Under all circumstances, the rider of a bicycle on the Strand walkway shall yield the right of way to pedestrians, and due and proper care shall at all times be exercised by the rider for the pedestrians. It is clear that the original deed intended the Strand for pedestrians, as the original ordinance governing the Strand specified. It is also clear that the 1970 ordinance allowing bicycles on the Strand for the first time, intended that they should be secondary to, and subordinate to, the use of the Strand by pedestrians. The action the current City Council has taken to dedicate the Strand as a bicycle path, accepting a large sum of money to make it so, is clearly in violation of the language and the intent of both the original deed and the municipal code. The financial liability of such action seems obvious. While I favor the R/UDAT proposal, it is questionable whether the building of a bike path on the beach west of the Strand would legally fall within the restrictions of the original deeds. Even if it does meet the legal requirements, once the County has allocated more than a million dollars for the current Strand, which has now formally become a " dedicated regional bicycle path," why under any process of logical thinking, would they then allocate a couple of million dollars more to build a second bike path alongside the existing one? And if they do not fund it, where will the City get that kind of money to build it themselves? If the second bike path turns out NOT to be a legal option, where will pedestrians walk? A reasonable person would conclude that the newly refurbished dedicated regional bicycle path will be the only bike path that will ever exist, and that pedestrians, for whom the beach and the Strand were originally dedicated, will be left with no place to walk. Are you passing that problem on to a future City Council? What will they be able to do after the fact? The improvements that are in the works will most assuredly increase the vehicular traffic and cause the accident statistics to rise. What good will it do to have a traffic study to tell us that there is a severe safety problem AFTER it is too late to do anything about it? More and more the pedestrians will be forced to give way to the bikers and skaters, because of the danger to life and limb. It is not acceptable to receive funds of this magnitude which are specifically allocated for a dedicated regional bicycle path, without a specific plan for providing a reasonable and safe walkway for pedestrians. I will continue to press the Countil to provide a plan for pedestrians BEFORE accepting the County funds for a dedicated bicycle path. Without such action, the Council leaves the City with potential financial liability. There are undoubtedly more solutions to the issue than I have proposed, and I have no one solution that I prefer over any other. But I have no confidence that pedestrians will have a safe place to walk at any time in the foreseeable future once the Strand becomes just another section of the dedicated regional bike path. Once again I urge the Council to delay the process until the legal issues are examined and resolved. As an employee of a city myself, I appreciate Councilmember Midstokke's consternation that this was not brought up earlier. However, the Council should realize that I, like many working citizens of Hermosa Beach, work long hours and I am regularly required to attend late night meetings as part of my job. It is not my responsibility to examine the legal issues surrounding the actions contemplated. The Council is elected to look after the interests of the citizens; the City Attorney is appointed to look after the interest of the Council. When a problem comes to my attention, I will do my best as a citizen to assist in any way I can. However, it is unfair to lay the responsibility at my feet. Further, the validity of the data is not negated in any way by the time at which it surfaces. I would hope that a request of the County Transportation Commission for an extension of time while a legal opinion is obtained, would be met with approval. At least it is worth a try. If it is denied, then I would urge the Council to begin immediately to meet with representatives of homeowner, pedestrian, and biker/skater groups, to develop a plan for separation of pedestrians and vehicular traffic. If such a plan cannot be devised, then the County money should be refused and reapplied for later when a proper plan has been developed. Respectfully, cc: Hermosa Beach City Attorney PLEy°se -mils a() / Quir c -r L 1/46611-0 4. The Hermosa Beach City Council c/o Fredrick Ferrin, City Manager 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: STRAND PROJECT/LIABILITY Dear Mayor Wiemans and Council members: RECEIVED FEB 0 2 1993 CITY MGR. OFFICE February 1, 1993 The public has concern with the legality of utilizing grant funds for a bikeway improvement project along the Stand. Essential information and discussion of pertinent matters is requested. 1. Originally, when the strand walkway was conveyed to the City of Hermosa Beach it was subject to deed restrictions. When the former council rezoned this area to be a bikeway/pedestrian zone it was for the express purpose to qualify for grant funds. Prior to the rezoning did the council obtain a legal interpretation of the grant deed? 2. Identify how the city currently maintains compliance with all ordinances governing the Strand area? 3. It's prudent for the city to review its responsibility for directly and/or indirectly intensifying a hazardous traffic condition caused by mixed use. Has the city conducted a risk/liability analysis? If so what was reported? 4. Who has the right-of-way? What provisions will the city provide the pedestrian population who desire to access this area safely? Until further clarification is received capital improvements identified in the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission project plan will exacerbate legal issues and cultivate safety problems. Please advise staff to research this material and report to the citizenry, good business will require a careful examination of legal issues prior to proceeding with this project and warrants reopening a public hearing. SUPP(,EMENTp, INFORMATNi(y Respectfully, Patricia A. rgerer, Hermosa Beach Resident Mailing Address: 1142 Manhattan Avenue, No. 282, M.B. 90266 Phone: (310) 379-2878 Mt Il_ WILLIAM a. SARK CP. ARLEU 3. voile CONNIE COoRt 3AN0IFER JAMES DUFF MURPHY ROGER W. 3PRINGER EOwARO W. LEE 1-1CRI SER70 R. OIA2 JANICE R. MIYAHIRA BCTI-1 $. 9ERGMAN ,JG4cl 4,2 LAW orr)CC OLIVER, BARR & VOSE rnerC3310N411. CORPOR*TIOn '000 SUNSET •0 JLEVARO LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90012 12131 230-3043 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor c/o Rick Ferrin, City of Hermosa FROM: ( jCharles S. Vose, DATE: RE: February 9, 1993 RECEIVED FEB 0 9 1993 CITY MGR. OFFICE TE1FcoP1Ea and Members of the City Council City Manager Beach City Attorney Deed Restrictions on Use of Public Potential Walkway/Bikeway Beach (213) 492-3334 You have requested a legal opinion concerning the potential use of a portion of the beach area for bikeway, roller skate and pedestrian traffic. Specifically, I was asked to review the deed restrictions on the beach front property to see is such proposal would be in conflict. CONCLUSION Considering changing conditions, in customs, usages and improvements, it is my opinion that the City Council may proceed with the consideration of the construction of a pathway for pedestrian traffic upon the beach area. Furthermore, there is legal support for a determination by the City Council to consider the construction of a bicycle pathway to be consistent with "a public pleasure ground" and not in conflict with the prohibition against the use of "vehicles, teams, horses, wagons, carriages and automobiles and every kind of conveyance, including cars of every kind." A reasonable interpretation may be made that the specific prohibition was intended to prohibit commercial vehicle use and other activities that would. interfere with said "pleasure or playground area." DISCUSSION As you are aware, between 1901 and 1907, the Hermosa Beach Land and Water Company deeded to the County of Los Angeles and SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION s rU 1.1 1 : JJ 11:1•S 1ST .JJo ilkj4,0 OLIVER, BARR & V05E Memo re Deed Restrictions on Use of Public Beach - February 9, 1993 Page 2. then the City of Hermosa Beach "as a public pleasure ground" certain property between the ocean front boundary line and the line of high tide. These deeds included the following restriction: "Said corporation does hereby dedicate as a public pleasure ground . . . land shown on said plot . . . meaning hereby to dedicate this last described tract as a public pleasure ground and common, thereby meaning to restrict and forever prohibit the use of said pleasure or playground for vehicles, teams, horses, wagons, carriages and automobiles and every other kind of conveyance, including cars of every kind." In 1964, the City of Hermosa Beach attempted to construct a roadway over a portion of this property to provide vehicular access to a fishing pier. A lawsuit was filed and although eventually ruling on other issues, the court stated that "the City is duty bound not to divert the use of the property from its dedicated purposes. . ." [City of Hermosa Beach v. Superior Court (1964) 231 Cal.App. 3d 295. one of the difficult aspects of this matter is an attempt to determine the basic purpose of the grant and whether or not the use proposed would be inconsistent with or violative of the grant or intent. The key phrase of this deed restriction, which is somewhat ambiguous, is the statement "every kind of conveyance." I have reviewed a number of appellate decisions as well as the California Vehicle Code and have not been able to find an adequate definition for this phrase. in the case of Park N' Fly of San Francisco. Inc. v. City of South San Francisco (1987) 188 Cal. App. 3d 1201, a term "means of conveyance for passengers or property" was used and specifically listed bicycles as a preface to this definition. Another appellate case used the phrase "any other public conveyances." As stated above, there is simply no other adequate reference in the vehicle code which would provide guidance for a specific definition that could be used for our purposes. UO3 y " J.) OLIv£R, BARR & VOSE ;ibho i„;01.14 Memo re Deed Restrictions on Use of Public Beach - February 9, 1993 Page 3. In the case of Abbott Kinney Company_ v. city of Los Angeles (1963) 223 Cal.App. 2d 668, certain plaintiffs brought an action to quiet title to beach front property fronting on the Pacific Ocean in the Santa Monica Bay area in which it was contended that certain conditions in the deed through which the City of Los Angeles had acquired title had been violated by the City wherein the City constructed an auto park on a portion of the property covered by the deed. This 1904 deed used similar language in restricting that the subject property be used as a "pleasure park or beach." In restricting the use of the property, the deed included language that "said lands and every part thereof must at all times be kept free from teaming. . ." In discussing the prohibition against "teaming" the plaintiffs argued that this term should be read to include all forms of transportation which modern technology has substituted for the horse and buggy of 1904. The trial court considered this argument and rejected it, specifically finding that the word "teaming," as used in the deed, referred only to the use of horses to draw vehicles, particularly commercial vehicles. The court also stated as follows: "We conclude that the primary purpose cf a dedication should dictate the interpretation accorded the grant. Changing conditions, in customs, usages and improvements, must be deemed to have been contemplated by the grantor." Therefore, the use of the subject property consistent with the primary purpose of the dedication (as a public pleasure ground). will be upheld unless it is strictly in violation of a specific portion of the deed restriction. "The dedicator is presumed to have intended the property to be used by the public in such way as will be most convenient and comfortable, and according to not only the properties and uses known at the time of the dedication, but as to those justified by lapse of time and change of conditions." (Faus v. City of Los Angeles r1967] 67 Cal.2d. 350, 357.) Clearly, the construction of a highway or roadway upon which motorized vehicles or wagons can pass would be in direct conflict with the prohibition included in the 1907 deed. However, a reasonable interpretation would not prohibit the use OB&V OLIVER, BARR & VaSE Memo re Deed Restrictions on Use of Public Beach - February 9, 1993 Page 4. of vehicles upon the beach in order to make emergency repairs or protect the public safety where such actions were consistent with the use of the property as a public pleasure ground. This may include the use of "four-wheel drive" vehicles for police and public safety purposes. However, such a use may apparently be in direct conflict with the specific prohibition. As stated, the provision does not prohibit the construction of a path or way, but rather the use of the property by vehicles, automobiles, etc. Even without a constructed roadway or a highway, the ongoing daily use of the beach by Vehicles or automobiles would be repugnant to the intent of the dedication. In consideration of the basic purpose of the grant, a walkway or path which is available for pedestrian traffic would not, in my opinion, be in violation of the prohibition contained within the deed. Conveyance is defined by Webster's Dictionary as a "means of transport:vehicle." Therefore, the threshold question becomes what type of "conveyance" is in conflict with the specified designation (vehicles, teams, horses, wagons, carriages and automobiles) andwhat type of conveyances are consistent with the basic purpose of the deed to have the property retained as "a public pleasure ground." There are numerous beach areas in Southern California which now have pathways that are open to bicycle and pedestrian traffic which traverse upon previously dedicated beaches. It is difficult, in the review of existing documentation, to conclusively establish the specific intent of the Hermosa Beach Land and Water Company in imposing this vehicle restriction upon the deed as it may adjust to existing circumstances. It would appear that as long as the interpretation by the City Council is reasonable and consistent with "a public pleasure ground or playground area" it would be upheld by the court if challenged. Csv:ilf 31x1 Date: 2/8/93 To: City Council From: Steve Suard, Planning Commissioner Re: Strand Improvements Hermosa means "beautiful" and we do very little to make it that way. It is the quality and quaintness which is going to increase Hermosa property values and make it a more pleasing place to live . However, it seems the Council has tried to push this project through as a repair to minimize the amount of review and resulting changes. I can only guess that you fear the extra cost, or fear that changes would bring in more outsiders. There has been and still is plenty of time before the funds have to be commited in order to meet this summer's deadline. The lower than expected contractor bids makes cost a mute issue. Making the Strand nicer would not increase the number of outsiders, only more parking is responsible for that. It will only make it more pleasant for all who use the Strand. We should include as many quality and aesthetic improving features as possible and not squander this perfect opportunity. Some suggestions include: 1. Undergrounding Utilities- A recent L.A. Times article on the dangers of radiation said power lines and transformers emit electromagnetic radiation and that studies have shown evidence of elevated cancer rates in children living near them. On Thirtieth Street. in Hermosa, the Parucha's 8 mo. old child is currently undergoing chemotherapy for liver cancer and they have found out that 2 other kids on the same block (for a total of 3) have cancer. They are in the process of selling their home and moving to Manhattan Beach. For health reasons alone, the City should make it standard policy to underground these power lines whenever major road work is being done. From an aesthetic point of view, the lines running behind the Strand are by far the most obtrusive when looking from the beach back toward the city as well as when looking toward the ocean view from inland. Redondo Beach has successfully been able to get Edison to pay for this cost via Rule 20 funds which requires Edison to do so in order to eliminate a concentration of overhead wires in high traffic and recreation areas. Given the possible reduced cost if it is combined with the Strand replacement, we should be able to get them to expedite the process which Redondo Beach said should take 6-9 months for all plans to be ready for construction. As the City of Hermosa only needs to obligate their Strand funds by mid- summer, there does not appear to be much of a timing problem. There would be minimal cost (about $500 each) to the homebwner to have the lines from the underground junction (which Edison will bring in up to 100 feet from the property line) connected to the house. Process: a. hold public hearing and revise Muni Code if needed by adopting appropriate Resolutions to allow the City right to require undergrounding cooperation and create underground utility district b. do application and engineering report (contact Maureen of Redondo Beach 318-0661 for hints/short- cuts; Edison contact is Bob Jenson 618-3725) c. must coordinate with telephone co.(Joanne Shepherdini 791-4234), Multi -Vision, contractors, and residents 2. Planter areas to replace wood barriers- If you look at any other beautiful beach, it has some green landscaping, including Manhattan, Redondo, and any resort. A tall palm tree or other foilage in a planter which serves as a sand stop and it would also increase aesthetics and decrease maintenance. At least a 3 inch PVC vine. capped at each end, could be laid at each intersection to facilitate thi or_ other options in the future. �Wator ripe5 3. Rounded wall top and darker sand colored wall to blend with the environment yet still be practical to keep clean looking. 4. Nautical colored and designed tiles embedded into the wall for street names, and recessed but removable plastic regulation signs so they are minimally obtrusive and easily changed to replace those painted on the wall. You may find that the recessed street names proposed in the bid tend to accumulate debris and dirt, and painted ones require constant maintenance. 5. More humanized street lighting/fixtures as suggested in the RUDAT report. Something like those along the Manhattan Pier would be nice, modified to shade light from entering Strand homes. Just a fixture can make such a difference - note the Gaslight district of Manhattan Beach! 6. Stamped and colored concrete (or paver tiles if affordable?) along the edges and/or intersections to create a more pedestrian feel. 7. Widen the Strand 5 or so feet if it is planned to keep bikes on it. The edges, wide enough to accommodate two people walking side by side, could incorporate the stamped concrete while the center could remain smooth for the wheels. 8. At 35th St. and Hermosa Ave. the pedestrian crosswalks for the street and bikepath should be combined and yield signs incorporated into the bikepath as (1) this is the first and most trafficked intersection for the high speed bikes coming from MB, and (2) that way the bikes will only have to stop or slow once. In the future, the Planning Commission would appreciate the opportunity to review final plans before bid on any major public works project. The above comments have been made without viewing the plans as both times I went in to Public Works the plans were being used. My telephone request of last year to the prior Mayor to postpone the bid process a few weeks to allow time to agendize this item for the Planning Commission prior to sending the plans out for bid went ignored. I sincerely hope that you see the potential benefits to the people of Hermosa Beach and their property to take full advantage of this marvelous opportunity to enhance the ambiance of the City's best known and used asset. There is still time!