Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/13/9393-5-69-72 s 3-io y9 "Praise, if you don't swallow it, can't hurt you." -Mort Walker AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 13, 1993 - Council Chambers, City Hall MAYOR Albert Wiemans MAYOR PRO TEM Sam Y. Edgerton COUNCILMEMBERS Robert Benz Robert Essertier Kathleen Midstokke Closed Session - 7:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER John M. Workman CITY MANAGER Frederick R. Ferrin CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart- ment, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting a packet also is available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: INTRODUCTION OF CITY TREASURER JOHN M. WORKMAN. PROCLAMATIONS: Medal of Valor Week, April 19-23, 1993 IOF Child Abuse Awareness Week, April 18-25, 19.93 Month of the Young Child, April, 1993 Child Passenger Safety Week, April 25 -May. 1, 1993 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with. the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing ororal- ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet com- pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities tospeak: before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be- gin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council." The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni- ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require .two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days. later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or- dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members. of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of. Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed. here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi- nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbalreports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1. (a) CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote:. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City. Council held on March 23, 1993.; 2) Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on March 31, 1993. (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive; and to approve cancellation of certain warrants as recommen- ded by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the March, 1993 in- vestment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer John M. Workman dated April 6, 1993. (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) Recommendation to approve request from Legends of_Vol leyball, Inc. for a professional beach volleyball tour nament`to be on September 12. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 23, 1993. Recommendation to approve pedestrian control at Eighth Street crossing of Greenbelt. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated April 2, 1.993. Recommendation to approve request for 30 -day extension of temporary appointment of one Community Services Of- ficer. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Black- wood dated March 31, 1993. Recommendation to receive and file report on noise or- dinance and enforcement. Memorandum from Acting Police Chief Val Straser dated April 5, 1993. Recommendation to approve Change Order No. 1 for the Strand Bikeway project to add six trash receptacles into the Strand wall. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated April 4, 1993. (j) (k) Recommendation to approve Change Order No. 2 for the Strand Bikeway project to dowel the concrete slab to the cutoff wall. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated April 6, 1993. Recommendation to adopt a( -resolution in support of AB 401 - Container Recycling Legislation. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated April 7, 1993. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (a) ORDINANCE NO. 93-1085 - ANrORDINANCE_OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH TO AMEND THE SIGN ORDINANCE TEXT, AND TO RELOCATE THE ORDINANCE - INTO THE -ZONING ORDINANCE. For adoption. ,,(Continued from -March 23, 1993 meeting.) (b) ORDINANCE NO. 93-1086 - AN ORDINANCE�.OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT, SECTION 13-6, PERTAINING TO THE RECONSTRUCTION OF NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRON- MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. Supplemen- tal letter from. Mr. Don Haggerty with memorandum of response from Planning --Department dated March 31, 1993. -- - - ----- (Continued from March -23,_1993 meeting.) (c) ORDINANCE NO. 93-1088 - AN.ORDINANCE'OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 88-932 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO FIRE FLOW FEES. For adoption. (d) RESOLUTION APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE HERMOSA BEACH FIREFIGHTER'S ASSOCIATION. For adoption. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 2, 1993. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. The following item was pulled from the Consent Calendar by Councilmember Essertier at the March 23, 1993 meeting and continued for consideration with sign ordinance: (j) Recommendation to adoptre-soliutio of intent regarding historic signs. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 16, 1993. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL, LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, 24-HOUR OPERATION, TAKE-OUT WINDOW SER- VICE ON STRAND, AND TANDEM PARKING FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR 3 PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1100 STRAND (SCOTTY'S RESTAURANT). Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 16, 1993. AContinued-from-meeting of -March -23, 6. R/UDAT IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY PRESENTED BY THE DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT BOARD. Report from Carol Hunt, Executive Director of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, and Dean Nota, Chairman of the Chamber of Commerce Downtown Improvement Board. - 7. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SOUTH SCHOOL CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, TO SUBMIT THE PLAN TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION FOR APPROV- AL, AND PREPARE A REQUEST FOR BIDS FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL FIRM TO PROVIDE DESIGNS AND WORKING DRAWINGS FOR THE PARK. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated February 5, 1993. 8. FINAL ADOPTION OF THE CITY'S SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECY- CLING ELEMENT AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE MANDATED ASSEMBLY BILL 939. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated March 15, 1993. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 9. BEACH DRIVE WALK STREET PARKING FEES. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated April 6, 1993.. 10. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE CONCEPTUAL RENDERING FOR A HERMOSA BEACH VETERANS MEMORIAL. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 30, 1993. 11. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR OIL DEVELOPMENT AND RE- VISED LEASE AGREEMENT FOR APPROVAL. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April. 1, 1993. 12. STRAND SAFETY ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATION TO. FUND FOOT PATROL UNIT. Memorandum from Acting Police Chief Val Straser dated April 5, 1993. 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) (b) Recommendations to implement new computer system. Memo- randum from Data Processing Subcommittee: Essertier and Benz. Recommendation to adopt resolution to withdraw from the Municipal Area Express (MAX) program. Memorandum from Planning Department dated April 5, 1993. . 15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (a) Request by Councilmember Edgerton to disband VPD Commis- sion and create Downtown Enhancement Board pursuant to proposed ordinance by Commissioner Newton to implement R/UDAT goals. (b) Request by Councilmember Edgerton to consider issuing one guest preferential parking pass to every household in Hermosa Beach. (c) Request by Councilmember Edgerton to allow residents to park in front of their own driveway. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT 5 ACTION SHEET ACTION SHEET REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 13, 1993 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 7:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: ALL PRESENT INTRODUCTION OF CITY TREASURER JOHN M. WORKMAN. SWORN IN BY CITY CLERK. PROCLAMATIONS: Medal of Valor Week, April 19-23, 1993 IOF Child Abuse Awareness Week, April 18-25, 1993 Month of the Young Child, April, 1993 Child Passenger Safety Week, April 25 -May 1, 1993 CITY ATTORNEY ANNOUNCED THAT AFTER THE HEARING ON ITEM 5 WAS HELD AT LAST MEETING, THE ITEM WAS CONTINUED TO THIS MEETING FOR KM'S INPUT. SHE HAS NOT REVIEWED THE TAPE OF THAT MTG. AND CANNOT PARTICIPATE IN THE HEARING. HE RECOMMENDED THAT THE MATTER BE CONTINUED TO NEXT MEETING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SHIRLEY CASSELL - COMPLAINED ABOUT PARKING PERMIT ISSUANCE PROCEDURE. MARY ROONEY RESPONDED WITH REASON FOR PROCEDURE. BETTY MARTIN - AGREED WITH MARY ROONEY'S REMARKS. WILMA BURT - AGREES WITH SHIRLEY CASSELL'S COMPLAINT. JUNE WILLIAMS - SPOKE ABOUT TELEPHONE BILLS. WANTED CONFIRMATION THAT TELEPHONE CHARGES SHOWN ON THE DEMANDS AND WARRANTS ARE NOT CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE PUBLIC RECORDS. CITY ATTY. AGREES. MERNA MARSHALL - JUST RETURNED FROM LORETO SISTER CITY VISIT AND INVITED COUNCIL TO ADULT VISIT IN OCTOBER. WILMA BURT - ASKED THAT ITEM 1(i) BE PULLED. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on March 23, 1993; 2) Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on March 31, 1993. 1 (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive; and to approve cancellation of certain warrants as recommen- ded by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the March, 1993 in- vestment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer John M. Workman dated April 6, 1993. (a) Recommendation to approve request from Legends of Vol- leyball, Inc. for a professional beach volleyball tour- nament to be held on September 12. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 23, 1993. PULLED BY KM - MOTION KM/RE TO DENY REQUEST. FAILS 4-1 (KM -NO) SE SUGGESTED SETTING UP ON FRIDAY AND HOLDING TOURNAMENT ON SATURDAY. CHRIS MARLOW SAID THIS WOULD BE POSSIBLE, BUT WOULD PRECLUDE HOLDING A VOLLEYBALL CLINIC FOR KIDS ON SATURDAY. MARY ROONEY SAID SHE WOULD PREFER ORIGINAL SCHEDULE TO BE ABLE TO HOLD YOUTH CLINICS ON SATURDAY. MOTION RB/SE TO APPROVE STAFF REC. AND ALSO PROVIDE TRASH RECEP- TACLES FOR RECYCLING PURPOSES. OK 3-2 (KM/RE-NO) (f) Recommendation to approve pedestrian control at Eighth Street crossing of Greenbelt. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated April 2, 1993. PULLED BY RE - CONTINUE TO 4/27 MTG. (g) Recommendation to approve request for 30 -day extension of temporary appointment of one Community Services Of- ficer. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Black- wood dated March 31, 1993. PULLED BY RE - ACTING CHIEF STRASER AND CITY MGR. RESPONDED TO QUESTIONS. MOTION RE/KM TO APPROVE STAFF REC. OK 5-0. (h) Recommendation to receive and file report on noise or- dinance and enforcement. Memorandum from Acting Police Chief Val Straser dated April 5, 1993. PULLED BY RE - CONTINUED TO 4/27 MTG. (i) Recommendation to approve Change Order No. 1 for the Strand Bikeway project to add six trash receptacles into the Strand wall. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated April 4, 1993. - 2 - PULLED BY SE. DISCUSSED WITH 1J MOTION SE/RB TO APPROVE STAFF REC. SO ORDERED. (i) Recommendation to approve Change Order No. 2 for the Strand Bikeway project to dowel the concrete slab to the cutoff wall. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated April 6, 1993. PULLED BY SE. MOTION SE/RB TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDER. VOTE: 4-1 (RE -NO). (k) Recommendation to adopt a resolution in support of AB 401 - Container Recycling Legislation. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated April 7, 1993. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (a) ORDINANCE NO. 93-1085 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH TO AMEND THE SIGN ORDINANCE TEXT, AND TO RELOCATE THE ORDINANCE INTO THE ZONING ORDINANCE. For adoption. (Continued from March 23, 1993 meeting.) CONTINUE TO 4/27 MTG. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 93-1086 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT, SECTION 13-6, PERTAINING TO THE RECONSTRUCTION OF NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRON- MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. Supplemen- tal letter from Mr. Don Haggerty with memorandum of response from Planning Department dated March 31, 1993. (Continued from March 23, 1993 meeting.) MOTION RE/RB TO ADOPT ORDINANCE. FOLLOWING DISCUSSION, RB WITHDREW HIS SECOND AND KM SECONDED. VOTE: FAILS 2-3 (AW/SE/RB- NO.) MOTION SE/RB TO CONTINUE AND BRING BACK AS A CONSENT ORDINANCE. VOTE: 3-2 (KM/RE-NO). (c) ORDINANCE NO. 93-1088 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 88-932 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO FIRE FLOW FEES. For adoption. MOTION AW/SE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE. OK 4-1 (KM -NO) (d) RESOLUTION APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE HERMOSA BEACH FIREFIGHTER'S ASSOCIATION. For adoption. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 2, 1993. MOTION SE/RB TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 93-5600. OK 3-2 (KM/AW-NO) 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. (i) The following item was pulled from the Consent Calendar by Councilmember Essertier at the March 23, 1993 meeting and continued for consideration with sign ordinance: Recommendation to adopt resolution of intent regarding historic signs. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 16, 1993. CONTINUE TO 4/27 MTG. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL, LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, 24-HOUR OPERATION, TAKE-OUT WINDOW SER- VICE ON STRAND, AND TANDEM PARKING FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1100 STRAND (SCOTTY'S RESTAURANT). Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 16, 1993. (Continued from meeting of March 23, 1993.) KM WAS NOT INFORMED OF CONTINUANCE OF THIS ITEM AND THEREFORE DID NOT REVIEW C.C. TAPE. MOTION RE/RB - TO CONTINUE TO APRIL 27 MEETING. SO ORDERED. 6. R/UDAT IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY PRESENTED BY THE DOWNTOWN. IMPROVEMENT BOARD. Report from Carol Hunt, Executive Director of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, and Dean Nota, Chairman of the Chamber of Commerce Downtown Improvement Board. RICK LEARNED SPOKE AND INTRODUCED DEAN NOTA. MARK FREEMAN - PALM DRIVE - ASKED WHEN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT FAC- TOR WILL BE IMPLEMENTED? RESPONDED TO BY PAT KILLEN. PATRICK KILLEN - ARE AWARE OF FACT OF RECESSION. TRYING TO STA- BILIZE EXISTENCE OF CURRENT BUSINESSES IN TOWN. 1) GET CITY TO STREAMLINE PROCESS TO EASE BUSINESSES IS IN., STUDY TO DETERMINE WHAT KIND OF BUSINESSES ARE NEEDED. AGAIN GOES BACK TO CITY MAKING IT EASIER TO START NEW BUSINESSES COMING IN TO CITY. MARK FREEMAN SUGGESTS SURVEYING EXITING BUSINESSES TO SEE WHY THEY ARE LEAVING. MIGHT BE VALUABLE INFORMATION. DON HAGGERTY - HAS CONCERN THAT IT WILL NOT DEVELOP INTO A RE- DEVELOPMENT AGENCY. SECOND CONCERN IS THAT HIS BUILDING WILL BE DECLARED A HISTORIC BUILDING. PAT SPIRITUS - IN RESPONSE TO HAGGERTY, DO NOT WANT TO CHANGE H.B. INTO A MANHATTAN BEACH. 4 GARY FROST - THINKS IT WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA TO LOOK AT REDEVELOP- MENT AGENCIES. MANY OTHER COMMUNITIES DO. MOTION RE/RB TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1, 2, AND 3. VOTE: OK 5-0. 7. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SOUTH SCHOOL CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, TO SUBMIT THE PLAN TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION FOR APPROV- AL, AND PREPARE A REQUEST FOR BIDS FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL FIRM TO PROVIDE DESIGNS AND WORKING DRAWINGS FOR THE PARK. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated February 5, 1993. WILMA BURT - WANTS GREATER PROPORTION OF SOUTH PARK FOR YOUNG CHILDREN. SHIRLEY CASSELL - SAYS THE TENNIS COURTS ARE BEING USED BY PROS FROM OUT OF THE AREA TO TEACH PEOPLE. SHOULD STOP IT AND LET CITIZENS USE IT. SHOULD ALSO FORGET ABOUT VOLLEYBALL COURTS. FRANCES PARKER = FENCING AGAINST BUILDING SHOULD BE CORRECTED - BECAUSE CHILDREN CLIMBING AND GETTING TO ROOF OF THE BUILDING. ALSO SPOKE ABOUT TRAFFIC ON LITTLE ALLEY THAT GOES TO SIXTH STREET. WANTS AREA PERMANENTLY CLOSED OFF AS PEDESTRIAN PATH. DARREN THOMAS 267 VALLEY DRIVE - NEED FOR THE HARDCOURT ACTIVI- TIES. TENNIS AND BASKETBALL COURTS SHOULD BE TOGETHER. SPOKE ABOUT CITIZEN MICROPHONE NEEDING TO BE FIXED. TOM MORLEY - ALREADY HAVE HARDCOURT BASKETBALL COVERED IN THIS CITY. NEED SAND COURT VOLLEYBALL. HANDICAP ACCESS ON LOMA DRIVE WOULD BE FRUSTRATING TO HANDICAP PEOPLE. J.R. REVICZKY - SPOKE AS A PARKS & REC. COMMISSIONER - JUSTIFIED THEIR PLAN. MIKE WEBB 247 VALLEY - SUGGESTED CUL-DE-SACING VALLEY DRIVE. KATHLEEN BUTLER THOMAS - ASKED IF A PROFESSIONAL STUDY WAS DONE. OWEN BENNETT 446 MONTEREY BLVD. PRESIDENT HOMEOWNERS ASSN. PROP- ERTY WEST OF PARK. THINKS THE BUILDING PROPOSED TO BE KEPT IS AN EYESORE NEEDS MAJOR FACELIFT. LIGHTING OF PARK A CONCERN WITH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. THEY DO WANT LIGHT, BUT NOT HIGH ENOUGH TO BE OBTRUSIVE TO ASSOCIATION. BETH HARRIS, 416 MONTEREY - THINKS TOT LOT SHOULD GET A LITTLE BIGGER. OTHER THAN THAT. SUPPORTIVE. KEN CONKLIN - APPROVE OF PLAN; ALSO THINKS TOT LOT SHOULD BE BIGGER. STEVE CRECY - P & R COMM. SUPPORTED PLAN. 5 MOTION KM/RE - HAVE THE MATTER SENT OUT FOR A COST ESTIMATE DONE AT NO COST TO THE CITY, SHOULD BE WITHIN 20% OF ACTUAL COST. (PIECEMEAL ESTIMATES FOR EACH PHASE). VOTE: OK 5-0. HAVE PARKS & REC. COMMISSION COME BACK WITH BREAKDOWN OF PHASES. 8. FINAL ADOPTION OF THE CITY'S SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECY- CLING ELEMENT AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE MANDATED ASSEMBLY BILL 939. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated March 15, 1993. MIKE PERRY PRESENTED REPORT. MOTION SE/RB TO RECEIVE AND FILE. MOTION WITHDRAWN BY SE. MOTION SE/ADOPT PLAN EXCLUDING THE HIRING OF A FULL TIME EM- PLOYEE. SECOND AW. ALSO WITH DIRECTIVE THAT WHEN IT COMES BACK WITH AN IMPLEMENTING PLAN, USE A BULLET APPRO CH. VOTE: OK 4-1 RB -NO Sm t q3-.56,01 "0 MUNICIPAL MATTERS 9. BEACH DRIVE WALK STREET PARKING FEES. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated April 6, 1993. MOTION KM/AW TO APPROVE NO. 8 MISSY SHELDON - FELT THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN A PUBLIC HEARING. SHIRLEY CASSELL - SUGGESTED A YEARLY FEE OF APPROX. 320/YR. WILMA BURT - AGREES WITH SHIRLEY. TOM ALLEN - URGE COUNCIL TO HAVE A REVENUE NEUTRAL FEE. WOULD LIKE COUNCIL TO START A 60 DAY PERIOD TO APPLY AFTER THE BLANKS FILLED IN. SET ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEE AND SETTLE ON A PARKING FEE. CONSIDER REVIEWING THE 60 DAY FUSE, LACK OF SUB- STANTIAL COMPLIANCE PROVISION, THE 30 FT. PARKING, THE 36" HEIGHT, ALSO HOW MANY CARS CAN BE PARKED. ESSERTIER LEFT MEETING AT 11:48 P.M. PAUL SHANK 1838 STRAND. ALREADY PAY A PREMIUM IN A WAY. DON HAGGERTY - HAS THE C.A. PREPARED A LEGAL OPINION ON OWNERSHIP OF THIS PROPERTY; KM WITHDREW HER ORIGINAL MOTION. MOTION AW/SE FOR A SINGLE ENCROACHMENT FEE OF ( ) PER YEAR, TO HAVE PARKING FEE THE SAME AS OTHER PARKING FEES (TO MIRROR ITEM #8 AND FOR NO MORE THAN 2 CARS OK 3-1 (RB -NO). MOTION SE/AW TO STAY ENFORCEMENT UNTIL EVERYTHING IS DONE. DEAD- LINE TO BE SIXTY DAYS AFTER DEAL IS DONE. OK 3-1 (RB -NO) 10. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE CONCEPTUAL RENDERING FOR A HERMOSA BEACH VETERANS MEMORIAL. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 30, 1993. MOTION SE/RB TO APPROVE. OK 4-0. 11. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR OIL DEVELOPMENT AND RE- VISED LEASE AGREEMENT FOR APPROVAL. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 1, 1993. MOTION SE/AW ADOPTING CITY MANAGER'S PROPOSAL INCLUDING POWER TO AGREE TO TERMS. SE/AW OK 3-1 (KM -NO). 12. STRAND SAFETY ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATION TO FUND FOOT PATROL UNIT. Memorandum from Acting Police Chief Val Straser dated April 5, 1993. MOTION KM/SE TO APPROVE STAFF REC. OK 3-1 (AW -NO) 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Recommendations to implement new computer system. Memo- randum from Data Processing Subcommittee: Essertier and Benz. CONTINUE TO 4/27 MTG. (b) Recommendation to adopt resolution to withdraw from the Municipal Area Express (MAX) program. Memorandum from Planning Department dated April 5, 1993. MOTION RB/KM TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 93-5601 WITHDRAWING FROM MAX PROGRAM. SO ORDERED. CONTINUE REST OF MEETING TO 4/27. 15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (a) Request by Councilmember Edgerton to disband VPD Commis- sion and create Downtown Enhancement Board pursuant to proposed ordinance by Commissioner Newton to implement R/UDAT goals. (b) Request by Councilmember Edgerton to consider issuing one guest preferential parking pass to every household in Hermosa Beach. 7 (c) Request by Councilmember Edgerton to allow residents to park in front of their own driveway. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT IN MEMORY OF ANNA POLAK. WIFE OF VASEK POLAK, AND ALSO IN MEMORY OF JOSEPH CRAWFORD, HERMOSA BEACH RESIDENT, AT 12:50 A.M. 8 SPRED: 1+-13-q3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Wednesday, April 13, 1993, at the hour of 7:4/3 P.M. *********** start page = 8114 ******** CLOSED SESSION - The closed session was held at 7: P.M. for the purpose of discussion of matters of litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a): Tocco vs. City of Hermosa Beach, et al. The closed session adjourned at 7: P.M. to the regular meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Wiemans Absent: None INTRODUCTION OF CITY TREASURER JOHN M. WORKMAN - Mayor Wiemans introduced John M. Workman, appointed as City Treasurer on March 31, 1993, to fill the unexpired term ending in November of 1995. /9 nTh co Iril FO e0oxs PROCLAMATIONS: Medal of Valor Week, April 19-23, 1993 IOF Child Abuse Awareness Week, April 18-25, 1993 kti Month of the Young Child, April, 1993 Child Passenger Safety Week, April 25 -May 1, 1993 ANNOUNCEMENTS - e. 7 City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 1 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION I Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any I items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding. City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: M"1, y �� (4- /79#/012 Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, Howard Lonqacre - 1221 Seventh Place, ilma Burt —1152 Seventh Street, Z),`'finv June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd. Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., ;7-7:;i,/(09 b - g ear e4�rriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Stf`eet-i-c- Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., /2 O , Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, n / Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, j_ ���o Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, r-)/ t/Y--Kt,eztu....--t __fr)--,'4,1,t) 42 Edie Webber - 1210 Eleventh Street, Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, City Council Minutes 04-13-93 'lMLAf Page 2 Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, Martin Moreno - 1326 Corona Street, Marc Freeman - 1937 Palm Drive, 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR J67) Coming forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consen calendar were: Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (k), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: (a) , (b) , (c) (d) , (e) , (f) , (g) , (h) , (i) , (j) , and (k) . Motion , second . So ordered. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on March 23, 1993; 2) Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on March 31, 1993. Action: To approve City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 3 (b) (c) (d) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants nos. 43507 through 43584 inclusive and nos. 43586 through 43650 inclusive, noting voided warrants nos. 43508, 43509, 43523, 43536, 43538, 43586, 43587, and 43606; and to approve cancellation of certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. Recommendation to receive and file the March, 1993 in- vestment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer John M. Workman dated April 6, 1993. Action: To receive and file the March, 1993 investment report as presented. Recommendation to leyball, Inc. for nament,to be held munity Resources 1993. approve request from Legends of Vol- a professional beach volleyball tour- on September 12. Memorandum from Com - Director Mary Rooney dated March 23, This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. --_ City Council Minutes 04-13--93 Page 4 za gfr-lf __ //7/ /71 7)7 =�7 Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: rte, (f) /04 /6' Proposed Action: To Action: To approve the recommendation of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff to: 1) approve the request from the Legends of Volley- ball, Inc. for a one -day, professional beach vol- leyball tournament (with fees of $5,079.50), spon- sored by Reebok, to be held on the Pier Courts on September 12, 1993; and, 2) to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract. Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Recommendation to approve pedestrian control at Eighth Street crossing of Greenbelt. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated April 2, 1993. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public Works Director McDonald presented the staff re- port and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 5 Proposed Action: To Action: To approve the recommendation of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff to plant a triangular shaped dense planting of thorny shrubs on both sides of of the Greenbelt at the Eighth Street crossing, surrounded by a protective bar- rier three (3) feet high, consisting of a 3/4" rope sus- pended through holes in 4" X 4" rough redwood posts at 10" centers. Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Recommendation to approve request for 30 -day extension of temporary appointment of one Community Services Of- ficer. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Black- wood dated March 31, 1993. a t� Action: To approve the staff recommendation to extend for 30 days the temporary appointment of one Community Services Officer, pending completion of current reor- ganization, which is in progress. Recommendation to receive and file report on noise or- dinance and enforcement. Memorandum from Acting Police Chief Val Straser dated April 5, 1993. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting. Acting Police Chief Straser presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 6 • r _ � Recommendation to approve Change Order No. 1 for the Strand Bikeway project to add six trash receptacles into the Strand wall. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated April 4, 1993. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public Works Director McDonald presented the staff re- port and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: '2; Action: To approve Strand Bikepath/Walkway Change Order #1: 1) to add six additional trash recepticles to the pro- posed 30 trash recepticles shown in the plans to provide a trash recepticle at every opening in the new Strand wall; and, 2) to delete the six locations with electroliers only (Bid Item #5), for a total contract cost addition of $3, 852. Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 7 • Recommendation to approve Change Order No. 2 for the Strand Bikeway project to dowel the concrete slab to the cutoff wall. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated April 6, 1993. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public Works Director McDonald presented the staff re- port and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: /3-0 Action: To approve Strand Walkway/Bikeway Change Order #2: 1) To construct a stronger joint at a discovered weakened plane in the existing cut-off wall by removing the previously assumed continuous footing of the wall down to the weakened plane joint, drill dowels into the cut-off wall, and pour a continuous slab over the cut off wall which would envelope the dowels; and, 2) authorize a contract cost increase of $40,902. Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of (k) Recommendation to <adopt aresolution in support of AB 401 - Container Recycling Legislation. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated April 7, 1993. City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 8 Action: To adopt Resolution_No.__93-5590, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH IN SUPPORT OF AB401."" 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE--NO.-93-1085 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH TO AMEND THE SIGN ORDINANCE TEXT, AND TO RELOCATE THE ORDINANCE INTO THE ZONING ORDINANCE. For adoption. (Continued from March 23, 1993 meeting.) Proposed Action: To Proposed Action: To Action: To (b) ORDINANCE -NO. 93-1086\- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT, SECTION 13-6, PERTAINING TO THE RECONSTRUCTION OF NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRON- MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. Supplemen- tal letter from Mr. Don Haggerty with memorandum of response from Planning Department dated March 31, 1993. (Continued from March 23, 1993 meeting.) cr-`) Comin forward to _a � ei joungi6 on this item were, / City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 9 Proposed Action: To Action: To (c) cORDINANCE NO. 93-1088 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 88-932 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO FIRE FLOW FEES. For adoption. Action: IND adopt Ordinace No. 93-1088. Motion , second 3ep( . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of (d) ,RESOLUTION APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE HERMOSA BEACH FIREFIGHTER'S ASSOCIATION. For adoption. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 2, 1993. Action: To adopt Resolution viO.r_.93-5 60, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTAND- ING WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH FIREFIGHTER'S ASSOCIATION GOVERNING THE CLASSIFICATIONS OF FIRE CAPTAIN, FIRE EN- GINEER, FIREFIGHTER/PARAMEDIC, AND FIREFIGHTER." City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 10 Motion , second The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. (j) Items 1(a) , (b) , (c) , (d) , (e) , (f) , (g) , (h) , (i) , (j) , and (k). In addition, the following item was removed from the consent calendar of the March 23, 1993 meeting by Councilmember Essertier and continued for consider- ation with the sign Ordinance (item 2(a). Recommendation to adopt rresolution, of intent regarding historic signs. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 16, 1993. Action: To adopt Resolution of Intent No. 93-5._ , entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, * Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL, LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, 24-HOUR OPERATION, TAKE-OUT WINDOW SER- VICE ON STRAND, AND TANDEM PARKING FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1100 STRAND (SCOTTY'S RESTAURANT). Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 16, 1993. (Continued from meeting of March 23, 1993.) City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 11 • Director Schubach presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8: P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: The public hearing closed at P.M. Proposed Action: To Proposed Action: To Action: To adopt ResolutioncNo._,93-5 , entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING PLAN, AS AMENDED, TO ALLOW ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL, LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, AND 24-HOUR OPERATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AND ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1100 THE STRAND AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1-4 INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 12, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT." City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 12 6. R/IIDAT IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY PRESENTED BY THE DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT BOARD. Report from Carol Hunt, Executive Director of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, and Dean Nota, Chairman of the Chamber of Commerce Downtown Improvement Board. The public hearing opened at 8:03 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: ,04 A-4,-------, .,,„,,,,-, ----). f.;. ,..., g) r7),,,, IN, '--- ) ‘..) . _ ‘ / -..r-. _. 144---4-74 1 S,/,.) • ;V -L---1--' 70".-0_,,9/Liz_t_A,--A-.--),i 00,k_1,,_., At:;: -.....)2 L_40____5_Jou r I / 1 Kk d-ef--' ( ".y "-------)---/ ) .(5) ) ) ,o_ — . 1 e1/47it:)414'-e-t-t--J ( ii 4-4?;17 .‘• )l S/.,T ,J— J -Le --- The public hearing closed at 8:,..35 P.M. /eL6h, 6)146e ? zz3--- ___-_ ,--,,,.._ tr---)/ , -I/ --,c v (e-----c- V 21"-- el----, 4.---- -Y"--',7 -,4-,-/_, ,_ .0 , .._ » -, Proposed .1,, 0 ,i,-- .___. Action: To ,( 4 J• , �1� V ,%--,-,--e--,---4- __ ._,___7(:-) --__ --7/ /2-- Ar -- 7:9 ">7 ( •A'''' ,* --- --v J7- d4-- `'%- --___to c; ro�osed Action: To `,ter' rJ o,� C�/ /�Z -�J)401 -72(1"."7? Action: To approve he staff recommendation to: 1) receive and file the report; 2) continue to direct City staff to work with the Chamber's Downtown Improvement Board to provide City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 13 assistance and information as needed; and, 3) recognize implementation priorities for: a) formation of the Downtown Improvement Board; and, b) renovation of the Pier and Pier head re -design. Motion second ,Q . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of 7. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SOUTH SCHOOL CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, TO SUBMIT THE PLAN TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION FOR APPROV- AL, AND PREPARE A REQUEST FOR BIDS FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL FIRM TO PROVIDE DESIGNS AND WORKING DRAWINGS FOR THE PARR. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated February 5, 1993. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:P.M. Coming forward to address ))e)the Co cil on this item were: v< s L.1-4" c 1 IS .1 /1- A)Z The public hearing closed at P.M.-� tff7/ (( -- e_A .‘74.4) /iif ,-22; )./e„ 4 ,0 P osed Action: To d l City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 14 111 cve ce-f-L, - ).) vtA7 " ?zi Aix , Cbz /� `---� • f ' /moo ,c7 /1 7 7,93 ) 4- eS- I) 4 a r,„ri„A)/afrr-A 7 r,‘„ r '_) 0 a ) XCetA-'? V/Z. /MA ‘---7347,1- r Y � J i< �z)i • .z-:--- ------Th - _,--1,---..--, Proposed Actio To .1--------"--' • f) Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community nAv.e-iesources Commission and staff recommendation to: ) approve a conceptual plan for the park site at Val- ley Drive and Fourth Street (formerly South School) �I that would provide for a low impact neighborhood park containing approximately 70% passive green space; two tennis courts; a combination volleyball/ basketball court; a tot lot; picnic facilities; parking for 25 cars, and pedestrian pathways; and, 2 direct staff to take the following specific actions to facilitate the Master Plan development of the site: a) submit the conceptual plan to the Coastal Com- mission for approval; and, prepare a request for bids for an architectural firm to provide designa and working drawings for the park. Motion , second carried, noting the dissenting votes of b) The motion /,_ _• ‘__e/ -o FINAL ADOPTION OF THE CITY'S SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECY- `J CLING ELEMENT AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE MANDATED ASSEMBLY BILL 939, with Resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Build- ing and Safety Director Williamrove dated /� March 15, 1993. �L� G/aj y x17._7 \ %�`/ l� %" t �I/ Action: To adopt Resolution No. 9 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF BEACH ADOPTING THE FINAL DRAFT OF AND RECYCLING ELEMENT AND HOUSEHOLD MEET AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DATED BY ASSEMBLY BILL 939.'2 ) 3-5 , entitled, HA THE CITY OF HERMOSA THE SOURCE REDUCTION HAZARDOUS WASTE ELE- DECLARATION AS MAN- --. City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 15 414 ill ) /7"A7 -z%r7 ree_75 ) //;-)z- ,r7) r, "fry 127 (*, ,te • vv Motion , second the dissenting vvotes of MUNICIPAL MATTERS The motion carried, noting 9. BEACH DRIVE WALK STREET PARKING FEES. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated April 6, 1993. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: rzeOrte 69 .8? , , Proposed Action: -77 _2 /`--127' 4-?/,. ---' ril & ----C- .__d 2 - To �� f �j--t'7 �% 2� Action: ,t / -- �,r,,`�-'-�` �j.3 �" tel l'ia'U71-. '----1---P sr-- elli.44---e'-( 7 ( - il _1,.., -,___ >,....42,1 9 P 671 a- )A--'2-4) -..- .3 /- P .--- - , 0 e - , . ,,..__< , /.=' ,-._ / .m-4/ )-1L. --,/' ei,,,e .-,... ____,..vE,...____ City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 16 Jo- 4:7-#)e a )wri )L /7-4 r / (17 z I g P/0 d�v -,6 9 --r e vC 9 - _2/ ty)i �Q;!/ 7L ) 4 a voz_ ---Vc/=_. (z20 am, C—Yc PI r ^/-e-frri4A. • c ��.6�©�- - q - /77 1 ---- id/id /0„:„0„,..) (7:1' Coming 91P )1 r'� J r n/- 7 743 RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE CONCEPTUAL RENDERING FOR A HERMOSA BEACH VETERANS MEMORIAL. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 30, 1993. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. forward 11. to address the Council on this item were: 7/2 ce Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and the Hermosa Beach Vet- erans Memorial Committee recommendation to approve the conceptual plan and rendering for a Hermosa Beach Veter- an Memorial, with the theme of "Veterans are Timeless" (selected to convey the spirit of honoring all veterans past, present, and future, with no particular deference to any war or branch of the military), to be located on the sandy area of the Community Center lawn on the southwest corner adjace t to llth Place. Motion , second j . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR OIL DEVELOPMENT AND RE- VISED LEASE AGREEMENT FOR APPROVAL. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 1, 1993. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. on) ovy City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 17 Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Action: To approve the staff recommendation for the language of the revised lease agreement for drilling from the City Yard into both the uplands **** and ap- prove the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the State Lands Commission. Motion , second the motin carried, noting the dissenting votes of 12. STRAND SAFETY ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATION TO FUND FOOT PATROL UNIT. Memorandum from Acting Police Chief Val Straser dated April 5, 1993. Acting Police Chief Straser presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: /1/ Az /7 Propos Action: To 00-7 /°-6 City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 18 • Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) authorize the funding of a foot patrol unit out of the Utility Users Tax to concentrate on enforcement issues on the beach, Strand, and Downtown area in conjunction with the elimination of the City's par- ticipation in the L. A. Impact Team; and, 2) authorize the placement of signs on the Strand in- dicating that pedestrians have the right-of-way at all times. Motion , second The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager Ferrin reported 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Recommendations to implement new computer system. Memo- randum from Data Processing Subcommittee: Essertier and Benz. Councilmembers Essertier and Benz reviewed their recom- mendations and responded to Council questions. Proposed Action: To receive and file the report. Motion , second . The motion **** Proposed Action: To City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 19 • (b) Action: To approve the sub -committee report to: 1) approve up to $2,000 to be expended from the $200.000 budgeted to solve some of the immediate needs of the pilot program (i.e., expanding memory capacity and adding hard disk drives) system; 2) approve up to $5,000 to be spent as soon as pos- sible on the purchase of personal computers for satellite offices (i.e., the Community Center) to eliminate the monthly maintenance and service charges the City is currently paying to connect these areas to the Hewlett Packard (HP) 3000 (cur- rently done by modem); 3) provide a plan to purchase stand alone computers for City Hall that can be networked in the future once the master plan is complete (see below); 4) make software selections in the critical areas that would enable the City to eliminate the use of the HP3000: Finance, Citations processing, Geobase, Business License and Payroll; 5) restructure the City's Data Processing division to include one new position (abolishing the two exist- ing positions) that would be defined as a skilled data processing technician/programmer; and, 6) assign the employee in the new position to design and implement the new system as well as to plan for ongoing maintenance and improvements. Motion , second . The motion Recommendation to adopt resolution to Withdraw from the Municipal Area Express (MAX) program, with Resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Planning Department dated April 5, 1993. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. ep/in Action: To adopt Resolution- No. 93-56 )1 , entitled, 'IA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A RESOLUTION TO WITHDRAW FROM PARTICIPATION IN THE MUNICIPAL AREA EXPRESS (MAX) PROGRAM. Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 20 • Councilmember Midstokke reported 15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. Request by Councilmember Edgerton to disband VPD Commis- sion and create Downtown Enhancement Board pursuant to proposed ordinance by Commissioner Newton to implement R/UDAT goals. With proposed Ordinance for introduction. Councilmember Edgerton discussed his request. Action: To Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 9.3-10 Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinace No. 93- 10 , entitled, 'IAN ORDINACE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH A DOWN- TOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION TO REPLACE THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS." Motion , second AYES: NOES: City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 21 • (b) Request by Councilmember Edgerton to consider issuing one guest preferential parking pass to every household in Hermosa Beach. Councilmember Edgerton discussed his request. Action: To (c) Request by Councilmember Edgerton to allow residents to park in front of their own driveway. Councilmember Edgerton discussed his request. Action: To CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. Coming forward to address the Council at this time. were: Howard Lonqacre - 1221 Seventh Place, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 22 Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, Edie Webber - 1210 Eleventh Street, Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, Martin Moreno - 1326 Corona Street, Marc Freeman - 1937 Palm Drive, ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned 1993, at the hour of J%k: y9A.M. to the day, April 27, 1993, at the hour of 7:30 City Council of the City on Wednesday, April 14, Regular Meeting of Tues - P.M. City Clerk City Council Minutes 04-13-93 Page 23 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on March 23, 1993, at the hour of 7:34 P.M. _ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Robert Blackwood, Personnel Director ROLL CALL Present: Edgerton, Essertier, Mayor Wiemans Absent: Benz (arrived at 7:36 P.M.), Midstokke ANNOUNCEMENTS - Mayor Wiemans announced that tonight's meeting would be adjourned in memory of Hermosa Beach resident Anthony Vega, who died March 17, 1993 at the age of 54, following sur- gery. Mr. Vega was the Assistant Principal of Morningside High School and, last December, coached the school's academic decath- lon team to its best finish ever. Anthony Vega is survived by his wife, two daughters and three grandchildren. (Councilmember Benz arrived at 7:36 P.M.) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Don Haggarty - Hermosa Beach, requested to be al- lowed to speak on item 2(c) when it was under consideration; and, Dallas Yost - owner of Pacific Screenprint, read a letter from Roxanne Hallstein of the Little League regarding the sale of soft drinks at the Chamber of Commerce's "Fiesta de las Artes", which expressed her non-profit organization's satisfaction with the arrangements for the use of the proceeds from the sales. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (m), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item -3, but are shown in order for clarity: (d) Benz, (f) Edgerton (on a reconsideration vote after approval), (h) Esser - tier, (j) Essertier, (k) Essertier, and (1) Mayor Wiemans. Motion Edgerton, second Essertier. So ordered, noting the absence of Midstokke. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Special meeting of the City Council held on March 2, 1993; -- 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on March City Council Minutes 03-23-93 Page 8098 ao) (b) (c) (d) (e) 9, 1993; 3) Special meeting of the City Council held on March 16, 1993 Action: To approve the minutes of: 1) the special meeting of March 2, 1993 as presented; 2) the regular meeting of March 9, 1993 as presented; and, 3) the special meeting of March 16, 1993 as presented. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. 43347 through 43506 inclusive, noting voided war- rants Nos. 43360, 43362, 43363, 43400, 43402, 43472, and 43473. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. Recommendation to receive and file the February, 1993 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure reports; 2) City Treasurer's report. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting due to a question regarding a listed expense of $10,094 for telephone on page 26. Finance Director Copeland responded to Council questions saying the amount of the charge was a typo. Action: To receive cial reports and to the correct charge. Motion Benz, second absence of Midstokke and file the February, 1993 finan- report back with an explanation and Edgerton. So ordered, noting the Recommendation to adopt resolution approving installa- tion of stop sign control on 7th Place at Reynolds Avenue. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated March 3, 1993. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-5594, entitled, ''A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CREATING A MULTI -WAY STOP INTERSEC- TION ON SEVENTH PLACE AND REYNOLDS AVENUE, AS HEREIN SET FORTH." City Council Minutes 03-23-93 Page 8099 (f) (g) (h) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #22304 for a two -unit condominium at 930 - 15th Street. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 8, 1993. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Edgerton (on a reconsideration vote after its approval) for separate discussion due to questions regarding project height and time line between Planning Commission approval and Council action. Planning Director Schubach responded to Council questions. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-5595, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #22304 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 930 FIFTEENTH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered, noting the absence of Midstokke Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #22305 for a two -unit condominium at 918 - 15th Street. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 8, 1993. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-5596, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #22305 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 918 FIFTEENTH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Recommendation to adopt a resolution relinquishing a portion of Aviation Boulevard between Prospect Avenue and the eastern city limit to the County of Los Angeles for the purpose of signal synchronization. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated March 15, 1993. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting due to questions regarding appurtenant work men- tioned on page two. Public Works Director McDonald responded to Council questions and said this was normal signage. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-5598, entitled, HA_ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PORTION OF AVIATION BOULEVARD FROM 118TH STREET TO PROS- PECT AVENUE WITHIN SAID CITY AS PART OF THE SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES.fl City Council Minutes 03-23-93 Page 8100 (i) (7) (k) Motion Essertier, second Benz. So ordered, noting the absence of Midstokke. Recommendation to deny the claims filed by the Hermosa Beach City School District and California Water Service and refer to the City's liability claims administrator, Colen & Lee. Memorandum from Risk Manager Robert Blackwood dated March 16, 1993. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to deny the claims filed and refer to the City's liability claims administrator, Colen & Lee. Recommendation to adopt resolution of intent to study possible text amendments to allow exceptions from the sign ordinance for historical signs. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 16, 1993. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting due to concerns that exceptions for historical signs would have been unnecessary if the new Sign Or- dinance (No. 93-1083; item 2(b)) had been passed. Proposed Action: To receive and file the Resolution of intent. Motion Essertier, second Mayor Wiemans. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Benz and Edgerton and noting the absence of Midstokke. Action: To continue the item to the regular meeting of April 13, 1993 when the Sign Ordinance will return and consider both items at that time. Motion Essertier, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Edgerton and the absence of Midstokke. Recommendation to authorize the expenditureof asset forfeiture, funds for supplemental F.B.I. Academy expen- ses and to receive and file this report. Memorandum from Acting Police Chief Val Straser dated March 17, 1993. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Acting Police Chief Straser responded to Council questions. Proposed Action: To not approve the expenditure of $1,500. Motion Essertier. The motion died due to the lack of a second. City Council Minutes 03-23-93 Page 8101 (1) Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file the notice of Police Sergeant Mark Wright's acceptance into the Federal Bureau of Investigation Na- tional Academy and to authorize the expenditure of asset forfeiture funds in the amount of $1,500 for supplemen- tal expenses during the eleven week training period, starting in April, 1993, at Quantico, Virginia. Motion Edgerton, second Wiemans. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Essertier and the absence of Midstokke. Recommendation to receive and file informational report regarding enforcement of blocking sidewalks on Longfel- low Avenue. Memorandum from Acting Police Chief Val Straser dated March 16, 1993. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Wiemans for separate discussion later in the meeting. Acting Police Chief Straser presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Norman Codd - 610 Longfellow Avenue, questioned the 36 inch clearance for sidewalks, asked for a clarification; and, Garrison Frost - 657 Longfellow rental property owner, requested a clarification of the Council Policy. (m) Action: To receive and file the report regarding the blocking of sidewalks in the 600-700 blocks of Longfel- low Street which stated that warning notices were given to the residents in December of 1992 which said parking over the sidewalk would be cited commencing January 2, 1993 per California Vehicle Code, Section 22500(f); and, since that time there have been a total of 397 citations issued throughout the City. Motion Essertier, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Edgerton and the absence of Midstokke. Recommendation to adopt resolution changing the starting time for City Council meetings from 7:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 17, 1993. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-5597, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE TIME FOR HOLDING REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL.", which changes the staring time of Council meetings from 7:30 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. beginning June 1, 1993. City Council Minutes 03-23-93 Page 8102 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 93-1084 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH AMENDING THE CITY CODE TO ALLOW VEHICLE PARK- ING ON PUBLIC STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE WALK STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF BEACH DRIVE. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 93-1084. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered, noting the absence of Midstokke. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 93-1085 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH AMENDING THE SIGN ORDINANCE, AND TO RELOCATE INTO THE ZONING ORDINANCE. For adoption. Proposed Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 93-1085. Motion Essertier, second Wiemans. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Benz and Edgerton and the absence of Midstokke. Action: To continue this item to the meeting of April 13, 1993 for decision by a full Council. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. So ordered, noting the -- absence of Midstokke. (c) ORDINANCE NO. 93-1086 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT, SECTION 13-6, PERTAINING TO THE RECONSTRUCTION OF NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Don Haggerty - Hermosa Beach, questioned why the Council wanted to regulate the number of con- dominium owners that could rebuild after a di- saster as it could affect 90% of the homes that are non -conforming; questioned why commercial property was not included as mostwere non- conforming; questioned what the terms meant as there was no definition; questioned who deter- mines reasonable cost or 50% damage; questioned why it had been changed from reasonable value to reasonable replacement cost; said the Or- dinance should be cleaned up and definitions given to avoid lawsuits. Proposed Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 93-1086. Motion Benz, second Essertier. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Benz, Edgerton, and Mayor Wie- mans, and noting the absence of Midstokke. Proposed Action: To send the item back to the Planning Commission with instructions to review the exceptions, specifically A(1), B(1), and B(d); to make provisions for an automatic appeal before the City Council with no City Council Minutes 03-23-93 Page 8103 fee requirement; and to include commercial property; then, to bring it back to the Council for a public hearing. Motion Edgerton, second Benz.The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Essertier and Mayor Wiemans, and noting the absence of Midstokke. Action: To continue the item to the meeting of April 13, 1993, for a full Council. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Mayor Wiemans and the ab- sence of Midstokke. At 8:05 P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to the public hearings, starting with item no. 5. (d) ORDINANCE NO. 93-1087 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT FOR TRIP REDUCTION AND TRAVEL DEMAND MEA- SURES (TDM) IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65089 AND 65089.3. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 93-1087. Motion Essertier, second Mayor Wiemans. So ordered, - noting the absence of Benz and Midstokke. (e) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING OR- DINANCE NO. 88-932 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO FIRE FLOW FUNDS. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated March 16, 1993. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 93-1088, which amends Ordinance No. 88-932, related to the use of Fire Flow Funds, to allow the payment of the remaining two Lease/Purchase payments on the 1990 Fire Engine; and to authorize the transfer of funds in the amount of $39,770.24 from the Fire Flow Fund to the General Fund for the fiscal year 1992-93. Motion Essertier, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the absence of Benz and Midstokke. Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 93-1088, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 88-932 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO FIRE FLOW FEES." Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Essertier. AYES: Edgerton, Essertier, Mayor Wiemans NOES: None ABSENT: Benz and Midstokke 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. (Councilmember Benz returned at 9:28 P.M.) City Council Minutes 03-23-93 Page 8104 Items 1(d), (h), (j), (k) and (1) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. After item 1(1) a motion was made for reconsideration of an ap- proved consent calendar item. Action: To reconsider item 1(f). Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered, noting the absence of Midstokke. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate items. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from B. J. Mitchell dated March 13, 1993 regard- ing bicycles on the Strand. Recommended Action: To receive and file. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: B.J. Mitchell - Hermosa Beach, responded to Council questions. Action: Toreceiveand file the letter, and to include it with all of the records of the Strand reconstruction. Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Edgerton. So ordered, noting the absence of Midstokke. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL, LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, 24-HOUR OPERATION, TAKE-OUT WINDOW SER- VICE ON STRAND, AND TANDEM PARKING FOR MOTORCYCLES FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1100 STRAND (SCOTTY'S RESTAURANT). Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 16, 1993. (Continued from February 2.3, 1993 meeting.) Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded,to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:08 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Peter Mangurian - 1100 The Strand owner and appel- lant, said he thought the item was going back to the Planning Department and therefore had not appeared at the Planning Commission meeting; Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., concerned with 24 hour operation, said the hours should be the same as other bars downtown; saw no problem with tandem parking for motorcycles; expressed concern with Planning .Commission decisions; and, City Council Minutes 03-23-93 Page 8105 Garrison Frost - Coast Drug, 58 Pier Avenue owner, said there was no place to eat a late dinner in Hermosa Beach; mentioned that he and his wife had to go out of town .to eat after the theatre; felt that people would get together in order to have a nice late night restaurant in Hermosa. The public hearing closed at 8:12 P.M. Proposed Action: To approve the Conditional Use Permit amendment and adopt the proposed Resolution, entitled, HA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING PLAN, AS AMENDED, TO ALLOW ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL, LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, AND 24-HOUR OPERATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AND ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1100 THE STRAND AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1-4 INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 12, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Essertier and Mayor Wiemans and noting the absence of Midstokke. Action: To continue the public hearing to the meeting of April 13, 1993. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the absence of Midstokke. 6. RECONSIDERATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A REQUEST TO MODIFY THE SIGN PLAN AT 555 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (ART'S AUTO CENTER). Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 15, 1993. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:21 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Lia Ishkhanian - spoke on behalf of her father, owner of Art's Auto Center, said it was very difficult for anyone to find the shop as it was on Sixth Street and a wall mounted sign could not be seen from Pacific Coast Highway; said the neighbors had projecting signs; questioned why this shop was being treated differently from the others; submitted photographs to the Council; and, Carlos Herzer - Sixth Street, said he lived across from Art's Auto and he and the other neighbors were in favor of a projecting sign; said he had just put a projecting sign on his business in Westlake Village that was three times as large and had had no problem from that city. The public hearing closed at 8:28 P.M. City Council Minutes 03-23-93 Page 8106 Action: To approve the projecting sign as specified. Motion Benz, second Mayor Wiemans. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Essertier and the absence of Midstokke. 7. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD LANDSCAPE WATER CONSERVATION SECTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 16, 1993. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:47 P.M. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing was closed at 8:47 P.M. Action: To not approve the staff recommendation that would have amended the Zoning Ordinance text by adding a Landscape Water Conservation Section. Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Benz. The motion carried unanimously, noting the absence of Midstokke. At 8:52 the order of the agenda was suspended to move to item 9. Action: To take item no. 9 as the next item of business. Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Edgerton. So ordered, noting the objection of Essertier and the absence of Midstokke. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. MID -YEAR BUDGET REVIEW FY 1992-93. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin and Finance Director Viki Copeland dated March 17, 1993. Supplemental letter and information from Virginia Elledge, Teamster 911 Steward for the Administrative Bargaining Group dated. March 17, 1993. (Continued from 3/9/93 meeting.) City Manager Ferrin presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. He said that the Union had voted not to take a pay cut at this time. City Attorney Vose said that the language of the AB702 was permissive, not mandatory. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Virginia Elledge - Teamster 911 Steward, spoke on behalf of the Union, asked that some of the PERS money be used to defer the proposed em- ployee lay-offs until the end of June; read the language of the AB702 which said, "... em- ployers shall give the highest priority to retaining or rehiring as many as possible of City Council Minutes 03-23-93 Page 8107 those Public Employees' Retirement System mem- bers subject to layoff or reduction."; asked that the employees be a part of the decision process in cutting expenses; Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., said the money from AB702 was employee money refunded from PERS and it did not belong to the City; said the money should be used for the employees and not to buy other things; Terry Bindman - employee, urged the Council to reconsider a one time expense of $33,000 from the PERS refund to save the people subject to layoff until the end of the fiscal year; said this small 3.3% would buy time for the em- ployees to look for other jobs and to put their affairs in order; felt the City should give people as much notice as possible; and, Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, said there was a need to change the structure of the City and the focus should be on what was needed for Her- mosa Beach; said he believed in team management and the City needed to have as many people as possible involved in reducing costs. Proposed Action: To approve staff recommendations no. 2 (reduce City Council salary by 50% for May and June) and no. 3 (reduce the City Clerk salary by 5% for April, May and June). Motion Essertier. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Proposed Action: To the extent of $30,500 1993. Motion Mayor Wiemans, use AB702 (PERS refund) funds to to fund positions until June 30, second Edgerton. Action: The above motion was amended by the maker and the second to use AB702 monies to fund to the extent of $33,033 for salaries until June 30, 1993. Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Edgerton. The motion car- ried, noting the dissenting vote of Essertier and the absence of Midstokke. 9. REQUEST BY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO USE THE WAVE VEHICLES TO HELP TRANSPORT PERSONS BETWEEN THE FIESTA DE LAS ARTES AND THE REMOTE PARKING AREAS. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 2, 1993. (Continued from 3/9/93 meeting.) Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Carol Hunt - Executive Director, Chamber of Commerce, said that any misunderstanding City Council Minutes 03-23-93 Page 8108 regarding selling soft drinks at the Fiestas had been cleared up; she spoke later (respond- ing to questions) and said that the net profit to the Chamber from the Fiestas was $155,000 last year and listed many of the activities funded by this money; Michael Learned - President, Chamber of Commerce, said he had talked with the non-profit groups involved and they were satisfied with sharing the concessions for the soft drinks; Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., said the Chamber made $350,000 per year from the Fiestas and they should either give the City more money or the City should charge the Chamber more; and, Dallas Yost - Kiwanis Foundation, said the Kiwanis has done the organizational work for the soft drink booth and the other non-profit groups are pleased to share the proceeds. Action: To approve the use of the "Wave" vehicles to help transport persons between the Fiesta de las Artes and remote parking areas, using Proposition C funds, at -- an approximate cost of $4,500 per weekend event. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Essertier and the absence of Midstokke. The meeting recessed at 9:10 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:24 P.M. and returned the order of the agenda to item 2(d). Councilmember Benz returned to the meeting at 9:28 P.M. at the start of item 3. 10. FILLING OF CITY TREASURER VACANCY. Memorandum from City Attorney Charles S. Vose dated March 11, 1993. Sup- plemental applications from Saverio (Sam) Perrotti, 1506 Golden Avenue, received March 23, 1993, and from John Workman, 1002 Tenth Street,' dated March 23, 1993. City Attorney Vose presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. City Manager Ferrin also responded to Council questions. Action: Mayor Wiemans directed, with the consensus of the Council, that the deadline for applications for the position of City Treasurer be,extended to 6:00 P.M. on Tuesday, March 30, 1993 and that an adjourned regular Council meeting be set for Wednesday, March 31, 1993 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. to interview applicants and make an appointment. 11. PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW COMPUTER SYSTEM: CITY HALL. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney and Finance Director Viki Copeland dated March 17, 1993. City Council Minutes 03-23-93 Page 8109 Assistant City Manager Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) reinstate the City Council two member subcommittee of Benz and Essertier to work in an advisory capacity with staff in making the final recommenda- tions to the Council about the system; 2) approve up to $10,000 to be used to obtain consul- tation services as necessary to design and con- struct a City wide network, assist in hardware and software selection, plan for and implement a pro- gram for the transfer of information from the HP 3000 to the new system, make recommendations for appropriate maintenance levels to service the new system, and to suggest potential innovative uses for the network (1.e., capability for resident in- formation services); and, 3) subsequent to the creation of the comprehensive implementation plan, staff will return to Council with "Request for Bids" for hardware and request to purchase software that would not exceed the scope of the monies budgeted (not exceed $200,000 for the total project). Motion Benz, second Essertier. The motion carried unan- imously, noting the absence of Midstokke. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - None 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL - None 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for a listing of the businesses requiring amortization for conditional use permits. Councilmember Edgerton discussed his request. Proposed Action: To supply a list of businesses and the types of businesses that need a Conditional Use Permit to Councilmember Edgerton. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Essertier and Mayor Wiemans and noting the absence of Midstokke. Councilmember Edgerton was advised that he could obtain the list by requesting it from the Planning Director rather than making it an agenda item. City Council Minutes 03-23-93 Page 8110 CITIZEN COMMENTS - None ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned in memory of Hermosa Beach resident Anthony Vega on Tuesday, on March 23, 1993, at the hour of 11:00 P.M. to a closed session for the purpose of discus- sion of litigation, Krause vs. City of Hermosa Beach: pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a); and, for discussion of Per- sonnel matters: meet and confer. The closed session was held at the hour of 11:05 P.M. and adjourned at 11:40 P.M. to an Adjour- ned Regular Meeting to be held on Wednesday, March 31, 1993, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 03-23-93 Page 8111 MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Wednesday, March 31, 1993, at the hour of 7:12 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Wiemans Absent: None Mayor Wiemans directed, with the consensus of the Council, that each applicant come forward as called, in alphabetical order, give a brief opening statement, respond to Councilmember's ques- tions, and give a brief closing statement. INTERVIEW OF CITY TREASURER APPLICANTS Coming forward to respond to Councilmember's questions regarding: the role of the City Treasurer in relation to the other elected City Officials; any comments or critique of the investment policy of former City Treasurers; the investment policy to be pursued in the future; the method of judging funds and fund managers, regarding safety and yield; investment experience or other qualifying experience; and, time available for the duties of City Treasurer were: 1) Anthony Antich - 2307 Valley Drive; 2) William G. Hallett - 935 Loma Drive; 3) Darryl Hughes - 353 28th Street; 4) Savario (Sam) Perrotti - 1506 Golden Avenue; and, 5) John M. Workman - 1002 Tenth Street CITIZEN COMMENT Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, asked for an audit of the actual hours needed to perform the duties of the City Treasurer and Deputy City Treasurer; suggested the compensation for City Treasurer be the same as the City Council; and, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, spoke to recom- mend that the Council appoint John Workman. APPOINTMENT OF CITY TREASURER The Council thanked all applicants for the position of City Treasurer for their time and interest. Action: To appoint John Workman as Hermosa Beach City Treasurer for the unexpired term of office ending Novem- ber, 1995. Motion Essertier, second Edgerton. The motion carried unanimously. 1a (2) City Council Minutes 03-31-93 ' Page 8112 ADJOURNMENT The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, March 31, 1993, at the hour of 8:21 P.M. to the Regular Meeting to be held -on Tuesday, April 13, 1993, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Milli., ?AILS -- Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 03-.31-93 Page 8113 .e7.?FINANCE-9FA340 TIME 10:32:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT FEB. 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT FEB. 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT FEB. 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT FEB. 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT FEB. 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT FEB. 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT FEB. 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES. RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT FEB. 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT FEB. 93 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT FEB. 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT. FEB. 93 H 'PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT FEB. 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT FEB. 93 PUP EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT FEB. 93 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT FEB. 93 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/25/93 VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * .. ACCOVNN DESCRIPTION 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00663 03/25/93 RETIREMENT 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00664 03/25/93 RETIREMENT 00026: 03/25/93 459, 940. 29 /RETIREMENT *94. 073. 19CR /RETIREMENT 105-400-2601-4180 00202 $1,075.21 STREET LIGHTING /RETIREMENT, $154.54 /RETIREMENT 00026 109-400-3301-4180 00070 03/25/93 VEH PKG DIST 00026 110-400-1204-4180 00005 03/25/93 FINANCE CASHIER 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00205 03/25/93 PARKING ENF 00026 115-400-8141-4180 00016 03/25/93 CIP 89-141 00026 115-400-8144-4180 00016 03/25/93 CIP 90-144 00026 115-400-8178-4180 00016 03/25/93 C1P 90-178 00026 125-400-8513-4180 00015 03/25/93 CIP 92-513 00026 155-400-2102-4180 00175 03/25/93 CROSSING GUARD 00026 03/25/93 00026 03/25/93 00026 03/25/93 160-400-3102-4180 00203 SEWER/ST DRAIN 160-400-8408-4180 00015 CIP 89-408 $1.692.84 /RETIREMENT 03.803. 46 /RETIREMENT 568. 34 /PET IREMF.NT $108.43 /RETIREMENT $259. 27 /RETIREMENT $67. 55 /RETIREMENT $112.87 /RETIREMENT $1,013.77 /RETIREMENT $68.34 /RETIREMENT 170-400-2103-4180 00073 $5,667.99 SPEC INVE9TOTNS /RETIREMENT 00026 705-400-1209-4180 00125 $259.01 03/25/93 LIABILITY INS /RETIREMENT INV/REF PARE 0001 DATE 03/29/03 PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP '$0. 00 $0.00 50. 00 *0.00 *0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 *0.00 $0.00 $0. 00 $0.00 $0.00 43507 03/25/93 43507 03/25/93 43507 03/25/93 43507 03/25/93 43507 03/25/93 43507 03/25/93 43507 03/25/93 43507 03/25/93 43507 03/25/93 43507 03/25/93 '43507 03/25/93 43507 03/25/93 43507 03/25/93 00000 43507 $0.00 03/25/93 43507 40.00 03/25/93 lb • FINANCE-9FA340 TIME 10:32:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION www CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST • FOR 03/25/93 PAGE • 0002 DATE 03/29/93 VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK DATE INVC PROJ * '' ACCOVRT DESCRIPTION • AMOUNT UNF.NC DATE EXP H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 .705-400-1217-4180 00127 $332.25 RETIREMENT FEB. 93 03/25/93 -MAKERS-NW /RETIREMENT VENDOR TOTAL $10, 558. 98 www PAY CODE TOTAL*********ww*w*****ww*********w***www*********w*******w*w***ww***** $10,558.98 R JUNE D. *ALLAN 05081 001-300-0000-3893 9PRINO CLASS REFUND ' 51917 03/09/93 01292 *90.00 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES www VENDORTOTAL*****ww*w**w*****w******w******************w*w**ww*w***w*****w***w** $90. 00 0.66 43507 03/25/93 51917 06345 43510 60.00 (53/25/93 R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00057 MISC.CHOS. MARCH 7297 001-400-2101-4306 01343 $14.40 7297 00035 43511 03/31193. POLICE !PRISONER MAINTENANCE 40.00 03/25/93 www VENDOR TOTAL**w*w*******w**w**w******w************www***w*w********** *14.40 R' NANCV*ANDERSON 51981 05080 001-300-0000-3893 01293 $28.00 51981 06338 43512 BPRINO CLASS REFUND 03/08/93 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES 40.00 03/25/93 www VENDOR TOTAL *28. 00 R BANK OF AMERICA, NT $ SA 04677 001-400-1141-4201 00155 .$250.00 . SAFEKEEPING FEES/FEB 93 03/23/93 CITY TREASURER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT www VENDOR TOTAL $250. 00 03896 43513 *0.00 03/25/93 Of R SUSAN*BIGELOW ASSOCIATES 04443001-400-1121-4201 00085 $3,333.00 RECORDS MOMT 8V8/MARCH 12 03/31/93 CITY CLERK: /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 12 000 40..000 03!/73 325/ „ 29193 $3,331.00 w** VENDOR TOTAL R BLACK BOX, INC. • 05054 170-400-2103-5402 00082 $1,014.20 CONVERSION BOX/PD COMPUT 99242 02/18/93 SPEC INVERTOTN9/EGUTP-MORE THAN $500 - www VENDOR TOTAL w*w*w*****ww***********wn****w*******ww**www***w*w******w*********** . $1,014.20 898242 06155 43515 41, 061. 40 03/25/93 R DEB8IE*BOHANDY 05090 001-400-4601-4201 01720 $140.00 HORSBK.RIDE EXCUR/REFUND 54464 03/02/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/NM/AT 54464 06332 435 • 60.00 03/25 6 /93 FINANCE-9FA340 CITY OF HERMOtlA BEACH • TIME 10:32:27 DEMAND LIST FOR 03/25/93 PAY VENDOR NAME VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUK DESCRIPTION www VENDOR TOTAL PAGE 0003 DATE 03/29/93 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *140.00 • BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY 00034 110-400-1204-4305 00024 4567,99 PARKING PERMIT FORMS 02/04/93 FINANCE CAONIER /OFFICE OPER OuPPLIES www VENDOR TOTAL. $567.99 www R CENTINELA 90. BAY VISA FEB. EXP. / LACkwo00 VENDOR TOTAL 03353 001-400-1203-4201 01017 03/16%93 PERSONNEL 484.80 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $B4.80 R MICHELLE*CHERRY 04884 001-300-0000-3893 01295 OPIUM) CLASS REFUND 51766 R428.00 ECREATION /CONTR RECREATION CLABBER www VENDOR TOTAL $28.00 05185 43517 01,67.99 03/2-,/93 05556 43518 $0.00 03/25/93 51966 06337 43519 $0.00' 03/25/93 R RICHARD*COLEMAN 05083 001-300-0000-3893 01290 485.00 54422 06347 43520 9PRTNO CLA98 REFUND 54422 03/09/93 /CONTR RECREATION CLA88E9 40.00 03/25/93 www VENDOR TOTAL' 485.00 www R COLEN & LEE A9 AGENT FOR LLAA CLAIMS/MARCH 93. R COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR LIAR CLAIMS/MARCH 93' R COLEN & LEE A9 AGENT FOR LIAR CLAIMS/MARCH 93 VENDOR TOTAL 04928 705-400-1209-4201 00362 03/23/93 LIABILITY IN9 04928 705-400-1209-4324 00382 03/23/93 LIABILITY INS 04928 705-400-1209-4324 00383 03/23/93 LIABILITY INS 415, 810.30 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $1,258.39 _ /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 47, 500. 00 /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS • COLEN AND LEE QUARTERLY PMT PER CONTR. 04715 705-400-1209-4201 00361 03/31/93 LIABILITY INS www VENDOR TOTAL $24, 568. 69 41., 470.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R COM SYSTEMS, INC • LONO DIET. CHCS/MARCH 00017 001-400-1121-4304 00611 03/31/93 • CITY CLERK *1,470.00 47.39 /TELEPHONE 05559 43521 $0.00 03/25/93 05559 43521 40.00 03/25/93 05559 43521 40.00 03/25/93 00042 43522 $0.00 03/25/93 00317 43524 $0.00 03/25/93 r • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:32:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST.CHOS/MARCH R COM. SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST.CHOS/MARCH R COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG D'IST.CHGS/MARCH R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIBT.CHOS/MARCH COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST.CHGS/MARCH R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONO DIST.CHOS/MARCH R COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG DIST.CHGS/MARCH R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST. C,HOS/MARCH R COM SYSTEMS. INC LONG OIST.CHOS/MARCH' COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST. CHCS/MARCH R COM SYSTEMS. INC ILONO DIST.CHOS/MARCH R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST. CHOS/MARCH R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST.CHOS/MARCH R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST.CHOS/MARCH CCM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST.CHGS/MARCH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LAST FOR 03/25/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ 11 . ACCOUN/ DESCRIPTION 00017 03/31/93 00017 03/31/93 00017 03/31/93 00017, 03/31/93 00017 03/31/93 00017 03/31/93 00017 03/31/93 00017 03/31/93 00017 03/31/93 00017 03/31/93 00017 03/31/93 00017 03/31/93 00017 03/31/93 00017 03/31/93 00017 '.03/31/93 001-400-1131-4304 .00447 CITU ATTORNEY 001-400-1141-4304 00630 CITY TREASURER 001-400-1201-4304 00682 CITY MANAGER 001-400-1202-4304 00682 ' FINANCE ADMIN 001-400-1203-4304 00692 -PERSONNEL 001-400-1206-4304 00610 DATA PROCESSING 001-400-1207-4304 00483 BUS LICENSE 001-400-2101-4304 01192 POLICE 001-400-4101-4304 00685 PLANNING 001-400-4201-4304 00613 BUILDING 001-400-4202-4304 00744 PUB WKS ADMIN 001-400-4601-4304 00793 COMM RESOURCES 105-400-2601-4304 00228 STREET LIGHTING 110-400-1204-4304 00012 FINANCE CASHIER 110-400-3302-4304 00703 PARKINO ENE $0.73 /TELEPHONE *9.84 /TELEPHONE $15.87 /TELEPHONE $16.20 /TELEPHONE $19.83 /TELEPHONE $27.70 /TELEPHONE $17.62 /TELEPHONE 0304. 48 /TELEPHONE $21.97 /TELEPHONE $63.20 • /TELEPHONE .. $42.57 /TELEPHONE. $20. 20 /TELEPHONE $8.05 /TELEPHONE $13.79' /TELEPHONE $6. 38. /TELEPHONE • PAGE 0004 DATE 03/29/93 INV/REF PO 4 CHK 4 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00317 43524 40.00 03/25/93. 00317 43324 40.00 03/25/93 00317 43524 40.00 03/25/93 00317 43524 40.00 03/25/93 00317 43524 $0.00 03/29!93 00317 43324 40.00 03/25/93 00317 43524 46.60 03/25/93 00317 43524 00.00 03/29/93 00317 43524 00.00 03/29/93 00317 43.524 40.00 03/25/93 00317 43524 00.00 03/29/93 00317 .43524 00.00 03/,25/93 00317 43524 $6.06 03/25/95 00317 43524 40.00 03/25/93 00317 43524 0.'6 63129%93 I., rt► 411. 41. IN dito 1=' • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:32:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY or HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/25/93 VNO M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 0*. VENDOR TOTALwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww+wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww**wwww*ww**** R CONNECTING POINT LEASING MAC PC RENT./MARCH R CONNECTING POINT LEASING MAC PC RENT /MARCH R CONNECTING POINT LEASING MAC PC RENT /MARCH R CONNECTING POINT LEASING MAC PC RENT /MARCH $4, VENDOR TOTAL 03617 03/31/93 03617 03/31/93 03617 03/31/93 03617 03/31/93 001-400-2101-4201 01230 POLICE 001-400-2201-4201 00375 FIRE 001-400-2701-4201 00073 "CIVIL DEFENSE 170-400-2103-4201 00151 SPEC INVESTOTNS PAGE 0005 DATE 03/29/93 INV/REF PO M CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 1595.82 $489.57 /CONTRACT BERVICE/PRIVAT *159.40 /CONTRACT BERVICE/PRIVAT *330.18 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $159.39 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT.. R• SPRING CLASSLASS RKATHY*CREFUND O 01294 $30.00 51905 06346 43526 51905 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $O 00 03/25/93 www VENDOR TOTAL $30.00 04716 001-300-0000-3893 03/09/93 $1,138.54 00051 43525 $0.00 03/25/93 00051 43525 $0.00 03/25/93 00051 43525 $0.00 03/25/93 00051 43525 40.00 03/25/93 R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION COMP.MAINT.DIAPATCH/MAR DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION CORP.MAINT.DISPATCH/MAR 00269 001-400-2101-4201 01229 03/31/93 POLICE 00269 03/31/93 001-400-2201-4201 00374 FIRE. $913.32 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $608.87 www VENDOR TOTAL /CONTRACT BERVICE/PRIVAT $1, 522. 19 R DIVE N' SURF .RISC.CHOS. MARCH 1740 00604 001-400-2201-4309 01447 03/31/93 FIRE $20.00 %MAINTENANCE MATERIAL§ www VENDOR. TOTAL *www****wwwwwww*wwwwww**www*www*wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww*www* DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPLY AI0C.CH08/MARCH R DIVERSIFIED. PHOTO SUPPLY MIBC.CHOB/MARCH 04394 001-400-4101-4305 00677 03/31/93 PLANNINO .04394 001-400-4202-4305 00758 '03/31/93 PUB WKS ADMIN $20.00 $139.13 /OFFICE OPER 9UPPLIE0 $90.74 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES �; :Ii . 6,: • .. ' • .. •.... 00007 43527 $0.00 03/25/93 00007 43527 $0.00 03/25/93 1740 00321 43528 30.00 03/5/403 00322 43529 0.00 03/3/93 00322 43529 SO 00 03/25/93 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:32:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/25/93 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M .ACCOUNT, DESCRIPTION www VENDOR TOTAL****+**********►**********4***************************************** R EASTMAN, INC. SUPPLY CHOS/MARCH 02514 03/31/93 001-400-1208-4305 01195 OEN APPROP PAGE 0006 DATE 03/29/93 INV/REF PO 0 CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 11231. 87 $269.92 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************+********************************** *** R • EASY READER PUB. NOTIC. /EMP. ADDS/MAR R EASY READER PUB. NOTIC. /EMP. ADDS/RAR VENDOR TOTAL 00181 03/31/93 00181 03/31/93 $269.92 001-400-1121-4323 00228 *511.70 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING 110-400-1204-4201 00011 $78.23 FINANCE CASHIER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRTVAT. R JULIE*EDWARDB SPRINO CLASS REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 05085 .001-300-0000-3893 54272 03/10/93 $589.93 01288 *30.00 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES R DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS PETTY CASH DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS PETTY CASH R DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS PETTY CASH R DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS PETTY CASH R DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS PETTY CASH R DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS PETTY CASH R DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS PETTY CASH 02220 001-400-1101-4305 00470 03/25/93 CITY COUNCIL 02220 001-400-1121-4305 00241 03/25/93 CITY CLERK 02220 001-400-1205-4305 00149 03/25/93 CABLE 'TV 02220 001-400-2201-4309 01449 03/25/93 FIRE 02220 001-400-3103-4309 01495 03/25/93 9T MAINTENANCE 02220 001-400-4101-4305 00678 03/25/93 PLANNING ':02220 001-400-4201-4305 00843 %03/25/93 BUILDING *30. 00 1113. 95 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $40. 78 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *11. 01 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $34.64 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 015.15 /MAINTENANCE MATERIAL@ *5.40 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *7. 00 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00324 43530 ..0.00 03/25/93 • 00326 43531 *0.00 03/25/93 00326 43531 40.00 03/25/93 54272 06351 43532 *0.00 03/25/93 03900 43533 60.00 03/25/93 03900 43533 $0.00 03/25/93 03900. 43533 $0.00 03/29/93 03900 43533 30.00 03/25/93 03900 43533 $0.00 03129/93 03900 43533 $0.00 03/25/93 03900 43533 40.00 03,23/93 It 11 • • • • 41. • FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 10:32:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS PETTY CASH R DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS PETTY CASH R DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS PETTY CASH R DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS PETTY CASH R DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY .TREAS PETTY CASH R DIANNE*FAIRCHILD/DEP CTY TREAS PETTY CASH *** VENDOR TOTAL *** • R MONIOUE*FIGEROA SPRING CLASS REFUND VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST . FOR 03/25/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N .ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02220 001-400-4204-4309 0259• 03/29/93 BLDG MAINT 02220 001-400-4601-4309 01132 03/29/93 COMM RESOURCES 02220 001-400-4601-4308 00805 03/25/93 COMM REROURCEB 02220, 001-400-6101-4309 01393 03/25/93 ' PARKS 02220 119-400-8144-4309 00003 03/25/93 • CIP 90-144 02220 03/29/93 125-400-8506-5401 00008 CIP 86-506 09089 001-300-0000-3893 51968 03/22/93 PAGE 0007 DATE 03/29/93 INV/REF PO 0 CHK * AMOUNT UNFNC DATE EXP $35.00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $9.99 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $49. 67 /PROGRAM MATERIAL@ $4.11 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $6.48 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS A16.50 /EGUIPMENT-LESS THAN 450 $239.64 01285 $30.00 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES R MARIA*FLORES DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 55843 *** VENDOR TOTAL 05078 001-210-0000-2110 05263 03/24/93 $30.00 03900 43533 $0.00 03/25/93 03900 43533 $0.00 03/25/93 03900 43533 $0.00 03/25/93 03900 43533 $0.00 03/25/93 03900 43533 $0.00 03/29/93 03900 43933 $0.00 ' 03/25/93 91968 06363 43934 40.00 03/2,/93 $250.00 55843 03898 43535 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 00.00 03/29/93 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH R OTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED : TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH R OTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH 00015 03/31/93 00019 03/31/93 00019 03/31/93 ,00015 03/31/93 001.-400-1101-4304 00541 CITY COUNCIL 001-400-1121-4304 00612 CITY CLERK 001-400-1131-4304 00448 CITY ATTORNEY 001-400-1141-4304 00631 CITY TREASURER $250. 00 $13.73 /TELEPHONE $38.81 /TELEPHONE $18.25 /TELEPHONE $35.31 /TELEPHONE ... ib •...-....... 00330 43537 $0.00 03/25/93 00330 43937 $0.00 03/25/93 00330 43537 $0.00 03/25%93 00330 43537 $0.00 03/25/93 I' • • • 40 • • • • • W 11 FINANCE-9FA340 TIME 10:32:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R OTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH R OTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH . OTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH R OTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH OTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED. TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH R OTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH R OTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH R 'GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED !TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH R R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED' TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH VND N DATE INVC 00015 03/31/93 00015 03/31/93: 00015 03/31/93 00015: 03/31/93 00015 03/31/93 00015 03/31/93 00015 03/31/93 00015 03/31/93 00015 03/31/93 00015 03/31/93 00015 07/31/93 00015 03/31/93 00015 03/31/93 00015 03/31/93 CITY OF HERM08A BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/25/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 001-400-1201-4304 00683 431.98 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 001-400-1202-4304 00683. 4128.97 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE 001-400-1203-4304 00693 465.48 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 001-400-1206-4304 00611 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE $349.00 001-400-1207-4304 00484 436.58 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE 001-400-1208-4304 00285 418.57 OEN APPROP /TELEPHONE 001-400-2101-4304 01193 41,718.54 POLICE /TELEPHONE 001-400-2201-4304. 00525 4208.06 ' FIRE /TELEPHONE 001-400-2401-4304 00530 *20.80 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE 001-400-4101-4304 00686 *114.60 PLANNING /TELEPHONE • 001-400-4201-4304 00614 *193.83 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 001-400-4202-4304 00745 4301.38 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE 001-400-4204-4321 00712 BLDG MAINT 001-400-4601-4304 00794 PAGE 0008 DATE 03/29/93 INV/REF PO N CNK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $62.40 /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT 4166.55 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00489 :03/31/93 PARKS 418.25 /TELEPHONE 00330 43537 40.00 03/25/93. 00330 43937 *0. 00 03/25/93 00330 43537 40.00 03725/93 00330 43937 40.00 03/25/93 00330 43537 40.00 03/25/93 00330 43937 40.00 03/25/93 00330 43537 40.00 03/25/93 00330 43937 *0.00 03/25193 00330 43537 40.00 03/25/93 00330 43937 40.00 03/25/93 00330 43537 40.00 03/2.9/93 • 00330 .43537 *0.00 03/25/93 00330 43937 40.00 03/25/93 00330 43937 *0.00 03/25/93 00330 43537 40.00 03)25/93 • a • • FINANCE -8E4340 TIME 10:32:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R R OTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHAROES/MARCH OTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH OTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH OTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELEPHONE CHARGES/MARCH VND N DATE INVC 00015 03%31/43 00015 03/31/93 CITY or HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/25/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT PROJ N ACCOUN/ DESCRIPTION 109-400-3301-4304 00076 VE•H PKa 62§T 110-400-1204-4304 00013 FINANCE CASHIER 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00704 03/3!/93 00019. 03/31/93 PARKIN* ENF 146-400-3401-4304 00011 DIAL A RIDE 610.00 /fiEL.EPHONE $144.86 /TELEPHONE $204.09 /TELEPHONE $4.16 /TELEPHONE PAGE 0009 DATE 03/29/93 INV/REF PO N CHK N AMOUN1 UNENC DATE EXP ••• VENDOR TOTAL $3,984.20 *TEL MAINT. CONTRACT/MARCH' OTEL MATNT.CONTRACT/MARCH R OTEL MA INT. CONTRACT/MARCH R *TEL MAINT. CONTRACT/MARCH *TEL MAINT. CONTRACT/MARCH R *TEL MAINT.CONTRACT/MARCH' R *TEL MAINT. CONTRACT/MARCH R OTEL MAINT.L'ONTRACT/MARCH R *TEL MAINT. CONTRACT/MARCH R OTEL MAINT. CONTRACT/MARCH 01340 . 03/31/93 01340 03/31/93 01340 03/3!/93 01340 03/31/93 01340 03/31/93 01340 01,/31 /93 01340 03/31/93 01340 03/31/93 01340 03/31/93 .01340 '03/31/93 001-400-1101-4304 00542 CITY COUNCIL 001-400-1121-4304 00613 CITU CLERK 001-400-1131-4304 00449 CITU ATTORNEY 001-400-1141-4304 00632 CI TY ,TREASURER 001-400-1201-4304 00684 CITU MANAGER 001-400-1202-4304 00684 FINANCE ADMIN 001-400-1203-4304 00694 PERSONNEL 001-400-1206-4304 00612 DATA PROCESSING 001-400-1207-4304 00485 BUS LICENSE 001-400-1208-4304 00286 GEN APPROP. 03.62 /TELEPHONE 19.82 / tEL.EPFIONE 65.17 /TELEPHONE $9.82 %TELEPHONE $8.78 /TELEPHONE $34.60 /TELEPHONE • $12.40 /TELEPHONE $14.98 /TELEPHONE $9.82 /TELEPHONE $5.17 /TELEPHONE 00330 43537 $0.00 03/2;/93 00330 43537 60.60 03/29/93 00330 43537 0.06 03/29/93 00330 43537 40.66 03/25/93 00067 43539 40.66 03/26/93 00067 43539 40.00 03/29/93 00067 43539 40.00 03/29/93 00067 43539 $0.00 03/25/93 00067 43539 $0.00 03/25/93 • 00067 43539 $0.00 03/29/93 00067 43539 $0.00 03/2/93 00067 43539 40.00 03/25/93 00067 43539 $0.00 03/25/93 00067 43939 40.00 03/25/93 is • r • • • • • FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 10:32:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R OTEL MAINT. CONTRACT/MARCH R OTEL !MINT. CONTRACT/MARCH' R OTEL MAINT. CONTRACT/MARCH OTEL MAINT„CONTRACT/MARCH ' R OTEL MAINT. CONTRACT/MARCH' R OTEL MAINT. CONTRACT/MARCH R OTEL MAINT. CONTRACT/MARCH R OTEL MAINT. CONTRACT/MARCH R OTEL MAINT. CONTRACT/MARCH ww• R OTEL MAINT. CONTRACT/MARCH` VENDIOR TOTAL VND M DATE 1NVC 01340 001-400-2101-4304 01194 03/31/93 POLICE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST . FOR 03/25/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 01340 001-400-2201-4304 00526 03/31/93 FIRE 01340 • 001-400-2401-4304 00531 03/31/93 ANIMAL CONTROL 01340 001-400-4101-4304 00687 03/31/93 PLANNIN0 01340 001-400-4201-4304 00615 03131/93 BUILD!NO 01340 03/31/93 01340 03/31/93 001-400-4202-4304 00746 PUB WKS ADMIN 001-400-4601-4304 00795 COMM RESOURCES 01340 001-400-6101-4304 00490 03/31/93 PARKS 01340 03/31/93 01340 03/31/93 110-400-1204-4304 00014 FINANCE CASHIER 110-400-3302-4304 00705 PARKING ENF *195. 27 /TELEPHONE *5.17 /TELEPHONE *5.17 /TELEPHONE $25.31 /TELEPHONE *44. 94 /TELEPHONE $50.10 /TELEPHONE $14.98 /TELEPHONE *5.17 /TELEPHONE *31. 00 /TELEPHONE $25.31 /TELEPHONE R CITU OF*HERMOSA PEACH WORKCOMP CLAIMS/MARCH 93 CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH WORK COMP CLAIMS/MAR 93 •*• VENDOR TOTAL JOHN*HEUER SPRING CLASS.REFUND 04075 705-400-1217-4182 00278 03/22/93 WORKERS COMP 04075 705-400-1217-4182 00279 03/31/93 WORKERS COMP PAGE 0010 DATE 03/29/93 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *516. 60 $2,164.05 /WORKERS COMP CURRENT VR *5,924.45 /WORKERS COMP CURRENT VR ••s8, 088. 50 00067 43539 *0.00 03/25/93 00067 43539 00.00 03/25/93 00067 43539 40.00 03/25/573 00067 43539 *0.00 03/25/93 00067 43539 40.00 03126/93 00067 43539 00.00 03/25/93 00067 43539 30.00 03/25/95 000E+7 4.3539 40.00 03/25/93 00067 43539 *0.00 03/25/93 00067 43539 00.00 03/25/93 05558 43140 *0.00 03/75/93 05554 43540 40.00 03/25/95 05088 001-300-0000-3093 • 01286 *436.00 54344 06361 54344 03/16/93 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES *0 00 43541 03/25/93 AP .t • AP AP • • • • w 01. • FINANCE —8F4340 TIME 10:32:.27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERM09A BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/25/93 PAGE 0011 DATE 03/29/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTALwww*******w*******41**w**w****41***********»www*****41***w*MMM«www***** *436.00 HOLLYWOOD BOWL 04642 001-400-4601-4201 01723 *110.00 06335 43542 TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP 03/08/93: COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT S .00 03/29/93 ••• VENDOR TOTAL***************•**********************************www***************. •110.00 R INSCOPE, INC. 05079 001-300-0000-3823 00151 FILM PERMIT REFUND 95705 03/0d/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL $89.63 /SP€:CIAL EVENT SECURITY INT'L FIRE CODE INSTITUTE ANNUAL DUES/GROVE *** VENDOR TOTAL $89.63 05077 • 001-400-4201-4315 00123 *30.00 03/16/173 SUILDIN6 /MEMBERSHIP 4*******************w******************* *30.00 55708 06336 43543 00.00 03/25/93 04281 43544 00.00 03/25/93 R LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. 04303 001-400-6101-4201 00315 $8,585.50 9466 00073 43545 • RE8TROOM9 MINT. /FES'93 9466 03/31/93 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/25/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL 0410 0** 9HELLY*MARCOLI8 05082 001-300-0000-3893 01291 9PRINO CLASS REFUND 94286 03/08/93 $8,585.50 *33. 00 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES VENDOR TOTAL****************************41*************************************** *33. 00 54286 06342 43546 *0. 00 03/25/93 MARTIN & CHAPMAN CO.. 00289 001-400-1122-4201 00276 0260.83 92777 03915 •43547 NOV.92 ELECTION COSTS 93777 03/31/93 ELECTIONS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRI'VAt 10.o0 03/25/93 VENDOR TOTAL $260.83 R JENNIFER*MATUJA 05086 001-300-0000-3893 01287 $45.00 54432 06355 43548 9PRINO CLA89 REFUND 54432 03/11/93 /CONTR RECR8AtI0N'CLA99E9 $0.00 03/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************************41******************* *45. 00 KENNETH A.*MEERSAND 04138 001-400-1132-4201 00135 $5,600.00 06164 43549 CITU PROSEC.SERV./FEB.93 . 03/01/93 . CTV PR139ECUTOR /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/25/93 prrttis�;- V FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 10:32:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND DATE INVC CITU OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0012 FOR 03/25/93 DATE d3/29/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ TRN N AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL w*0w**www*00000**0000***www*www****0.000*ww*********000000****w**www *5.600.00 BRENDAN*MOIR LITE TECH/MAR. 1. 1993 04660 001-400-4601-4201 01722 •66.00 ,. 03/11/93, COMM REBOURCEB /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL 0*****************************w***********w*********ww0********0000* *66. 00 R MOORE 9U81NE89 FORME 00423. 110-400-1204-4305 00023 •4.092.23 PARKING CITE NOTICES ' 11028 02/08/93 FINANCE CASHIER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 0** VENDOR TOTAL $4.092.23 R OFFICE.DEPOT 04142 001-400-1208-4305 01197 $273.54 MIBC.CHOS./MARCH 93 2 03/31/93 OEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *0* VENDOR TOTAL *273.54 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMP. HOOKUPS/HAWTP4. P.D. 0** VENDOR TOTAL 00* 00321 001-400-2101-4304 03/31/93 POLICE 01 195 0150.30 /TELEPHONE *150. 30. 07411028 06354 43590- 00,00 03/25/73--- 05172 43551 00.00 03/25/93 00385 43592 00.00' 03/25/93 00036 43553 00.00 03725/93 R PAK MEET 00519 001-400-4204-4309 02600 •1,947.03 06053 43554 :JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ; 02/22/93 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01,936.30 03/25/93 VENDOR TOTAL 01. 947. 03 PEOPLE TO PEOPLE HIGH SCHOOL 04463 001-210-0000-2110 05262 *500.00 —promos DEPOSIT REFUND 456I0...... 03/24/93 TDEPOS1T8/90RK GUARANTEE 000 VENDOR TOTAL *500. 00 R INORID*PLI9KA 04346 001-300-0000-3893 01297 *28.00 SPRING CLASS REFUND 51989 03/08/93 /CONTR RECREATION'CLASSEB *** VENDOR TOTAL' POSTAGE ON CALL POSTAGE METER RESET *28. 00 04091 001-400-1208-4305 01196 $2.008.00 03/31/93 . OWN APPROP OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES r.I 49610 03899 .43555 30.00 03/25/93 I. 51989 06340 43556 110.00 03/25/93 08080 43557 40.00 03/25/93 Aro • • • • • • • I” • A FINANCE-9FA340 TIME 10:32:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ws* VENDOR TOTAL R PRINTCRAFT PARKING PERMIT FORMS8669 w*w VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA REACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/25/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0013 DATE 63/29/93 INV/REF PO N CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *2. 008. 00 05027 110-400-1204-4305 00025 $547.59 02/04/93 FINANCE CABNIER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R REGENTS OF UNIV OF CALIFORNIA BPRINO TUTION/CARU80 www VENDOR TOTAL 02456 001-400-2101-4316 03/16/93 POLICE $547.59 01001 $325.00 /TRAINING R BETH J. *SHAW REFUND OVERPAYMENT www VENDOR TOTAL 05087 110-300-0000-3302 50467 06411 03/11/93 $325. 00 *20.00 /COURT' FINES/PARKING *20.00 R SINCLAIR PAINT CO.01399 001-400-4204-4309 02598 $220.62 PAINT SUPPLY CH09/MARCH 03/31/93 BLDO HA!NT /MAINTENANCE MATERIAL$ sirs VENDOR TOTAL*******************s************4******w**www***********s******ii**to* $220.62 *w* *w* SMART R. FINAL IRIS COMPANY MIBC.CHCS/MARCH R SMART & FINAL IRI9 COMPANY MISC.CNC9/MARCN VENDOR TOTAL 00114 03/31/93 00114 0x/31/93 001-400-1101-4305 00469 $68.02 CITY.COUNCIL /OFPICE OPER SUPPLIES 001-400-4601-4308 00804 $44.57 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. BUS PASS SALES RTD/MAR93 VENDOR TOTAL $112.59 00843 1,45-400-3403-4251 00154 $1:139.00 03/31/93 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT STEPHANIE OLABS*BOLOMON SPRING CLASS REFUND 51920 $11139. 00 8669 05168 43559 40.00 03/29/93 06163 43559 $0.00 03/26/93 1406411 06403 43560 $0.00 03/25/93 00361 $0.00 43561 03/25/93 00362 43562 *0. 00 03/25/93 00362 43562 $0.00 03/25/93 06404 43563 $0.00 03/25/93 :03500 001-300-0000-3993 '.01296 •28.00 51920 06339 03/08/93 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 43564 03/25/93 • • r' FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 10:32:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND M DATE INVC CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/25/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION •** VENDOR TOTAL *******************,A** ****A*********AAA,A*********AMA***11,11******* R SOUTH BAY CANCER & HEALTH SPRING CLASS REFUND 54285 PAGE 0014 DATE 03/29/93 INV/REF PO N CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *28. 00 00584 001-300-0000-3893 01289 *28.00 03/08/93 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL ******AAA***************NA****A,A*******AA*******A****************** R SOUTH BAY CYCLES HELMETB/PKO. ENF. *28. 00 04742 110-400-3302-4187 00403 0300.00 03/31/93 PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL****************#*************************************************** R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER ,IBC. CHO8. MARCH R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER MIBC.CHOS. MARCH *** VENDOR TOTAL *** 00113 001-400-2101-4309 00599 03/31/93 00113 03/31/93 POLICE 001-400-4205-4309 00708 *300. 00 017.87 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *15. 16 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL DISCOUNT OFFERED SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL DISCOUNT TAKEN SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL 'PRISONER EMERO. SERV. VENDOR TOTAL 00107 03/18/93 00107 03/18/93 00107 03/10/93 001-202-0000-2021 001-202-0000-2022 001-400-2101-4201 POLICE 00376 00374 01231 *175. 50 /CONTRACT 9ERV10E/PR!VAT *33. 03 *94. 50 DI9COUNT9 OFFERED *94. 50CR /DISCOUNTS TAKEN R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITATION COURT BAIL *** VENDOR TOTAL 00400 110-300-0000-3302 03/15/93 *175. 50 50466 *603.00 /COURT FINES/PARKIN§ SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC. CHOB. MARCH 00018 001-400-2201-4309 CO3/31/93 FIRE . *603. 00 01448 *42.22 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 54289 06341 4365 "0.00 03/25/93 05161 43.566 0324.75 03/25/93 00363 43367 00.00 03/25/93 00363 43567 40.00 0l) 5/93 06167 43568 40.00 153/25/93 06167 43568 40.00 03/25/93 06167. 143568 40.00 O3i5193 06402 43569 . 40.00 03%29%93 00365 43370. 40.00 03/25/93 • • • • • • • • • • • • • FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 10:32:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION SOUTH BAY WELDERS M!SC. CHOS. MARCH R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC. CHOB. MARCH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/25/93 VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00018 001-400-3103-4309 01494 $14.00 03/31/43 3T MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIAL§ 00018 001-400-3104-4309 01032 *14.00 03/31/93 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL *70. 22 PAGE 0015 DATE 63/29/93 INV/REF PO * CNK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLINGS/MARCH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLING§/MARCH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLINGS/MARCH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLIN09/MARCH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLINGS/MARCH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLINGS/MARCN 00159 001-400-3101-4303 00266 03/31/93 MEDIANS._. 00159 001-400-3104-4303 00157 03/31/93 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00653 03/31/93 BL00 MAYN'T' 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00501 03/31/93 PARKS 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00424 03/31/43 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00228 03/31/93 485.11 /UTILITIES $499.42 'TRAFFIC SAFETY /UTILITIES *4,619.64 /UTILIt1E8 $2,816.59 /UTILITIES *325. 65 STREET LIOHTIN* /UTILITIES 048.01 SEWER/BT DRAIN /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00654 *288.78 03/31/93 BLDG MAINT /UT11_ItrES *** VENDOR TOTAL R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OAS CO. OAS BILLING/MARCH *8, 394. 42 R 9PORTMART MISC. CHARGES/MARCH • *** VENDOR TOTAL *288. 78 03479 001-400-4601-4308 00503 *64.72 03/31/93 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS R STATE OF CALIFORNIA FINORPRT/WEAPON APPS. FEB 17892 . 00364 001-400-2101-4251 ..03/12/93 POLICE $64.,72 00482 *81.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 00365 •43570 *0.00 03/25/93 00365 43570 40.00 03/25/93 00366 43571 40.00 03/29%93 00366 43571 *0.00 03/25/93 00366 43571 *0.00 03/25/93 00366 43571 40.00 03/25/93 00366 43571 10.00 03/25/93 00366 43571 60.00 03/29/93 00367 43572 *0.00 03/2/93 00369 43573 *0. 00 03/25/93 917892 00023 43574 *0 00 03/25/93 416. • • • r V • 1 1 P • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:32:27 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/25/93 PAGE 0016 DATE 03/29/93 PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP www VENDOR TOTAL w 081. 00 R SUMITOMO BANK 04751 001-400-3104-6900 00121 $855.11 00066 43575 PAINT TRUCK LEASE/APRIL 03/31/93 TRAFFIC SAFETY /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 03/25/93 www VENDOR. TOTAL 000 **** 0855. 11 R SUNSET RANCH HOLLYWOOD STABLES 04632 001-400-4601-4201 01721 $990.00 06356 43576 HORSEBACK TRIP TICKETS 03/15/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00.00 03/25/93 VENDOR TOTAL $990.00 R SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 03158 001-400-4601-4201 01719 0424.00 06324 43377 FILMS/CHILDRENB'THEATRE 03/15/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0 00 03/25/93 wow VENDOR TOTAL $424.00 R J. E.0TALLERICO 04247 110-400-1204-4201 00010 4240.00 199 05171 43578 PKO.PMT. PROGRAM CROS. 199 01/17/93 FINANCE CASHIER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00.00 03/25/93 www VENDOR TOTAL 0240.00 R TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION,. INC. 03421 001-400-2101-4201 01228 COMP.TUVINO SERV/FEB:93 1141 03/01/93 POLICE $200.00 1141 00069 43579 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00.00 03/25/93 www VENDOR TOTAL $200.00 TRANSPORTATION CHARTER SERV. 05018 BUS/SKI TRIP 9598 03/01/93 145-400-3409-4201 00052 $42.00 9598 06352 •43590 REC TRANBPTN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 03/25/93 www VENDOR TOTAL 042.00 R NAOMA*VALDES 04040 001-400-1122-4305 00174 $178.61 03916 43581 F.P.P.C. COPIES ., 03/15/93 ELECTIONS /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 03/25/93 '• www VENDOR TOTAL' R • JOHN*VAN DEN EYKEL SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR 7080 .*sok , $178. 61 03374 001-400-4601-4221 00157 $70.00 • 03/22/93 WW1 RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLA89/PROR 06364 43592 $0.00 03/25/93 1 / 1„ I I • • I FINANCE-9FA340 TIME 10:32:27 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION www VENDOR TOTAL VND N DATE INVC CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/25/93 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0017 DATE 03/29/93 INV/REF PO 0 CHK w AMOUN1 UNENC DATE EXP *70. 00 R WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY 00141 001-400-1121-4201 00084 4114.31 PIISC.CHO9./MARCH 93 03/31/93 CITY CLERK /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAF www VENDOR TOTAL *a****r******r.**w:aaw**raw**a***warwwww•*w•www*wwrr•*www•wr*wwwrar** *114.31 90T MARK*WRIGHT MI9C. EXPENSES/FBI ACAD. 00133 170-400-2103-4316 00055 41,500.00 03/31/93 OPEC INVEST0TN9 /TRAININQ ww* VENDOR TOTALww**ra*rww*w**rwwwr*r*rw**wrr**r***wa*rw**www••ww•www*wrwwr*w*w**waw •0* PAY CODE TOTAL •w• TOTAL WARRANTS 41. 500. 00 *90. 511. 85 4101, 070. 83 00379 43593 40.00 03/25/93 06169 ' 43584 *0. 00 03/25/93 1 KRIS, CERTIFY THAI THF. DFMANDy OR CLAIMS COVERED Sy THE WARRANTS LISTE6 ON PARES. I toil INcL11sIVE, OF THE WARRANT.REG/STER FOR ,BTLi�7` FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, ANO ARE ARF ACCURATE, TO THE BNROET. E IN CONFURIp�N�� BY FINANCE DIREC OR DAT[ 4 j 3 u 'FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:28:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R A&B AIR CONDITIONING VANES FOR WINDMILL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/01/93 VND M' ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M • ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0001 DATE 04/01/93 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00002 001-400-6101-4309 01396 $243.56 03/22/93 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL ***********0000***********4$*** ********************************** R A-1 COAST RENTALS MISC CHARGES/MAR 93 *** VENDOR TOTAL 00029 125-400-8508-4309 00037 61203 03/3.1/93 CIP 85-508 $243.56 06078 43588 $243.56 04/01/93 $115.30 161203 00031 43589 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 04/01/93 ******************************************************************** R ADAMSON INDUSTRIES MISC CHARGES/MAR 93 R ADAMSON INDUSTRIF..S MISC CHARGES/MAR 93. *0* VENDOR TOTAL 00138 0017400-2101-4309 00601 03/31/93 POLICE 00138 001-400-2201-4305 00609 03/31/93 FIRE $115.30 $488.71 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS • • $24.08 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/APRIL 93 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS' RADIO MAINT/APRIL 93 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/APRIL 93 *** VENDOR TOTAL. 0 R AMERICAN EAGLE BUS/COMM RES TRIPS *** VENDOR TOTAL 70707 70707 70594 00935 001-400-2101-4201 01236 03/25/93 POLICE 00935 001-400-2201-4201 00378 03/25/93 FIRE 0512.79 $2,315.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $195.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/.PRIVAT 00935 110-400-3302-4307 00079 . $239.50 03/25/93 PARKINO ENF /RADIO MAINTENANCE $2,750.00 03118 145-400-3409-4201 00054 $625.00 03/31/93 REC TRANSP.TN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 'PRISONER MEALS/MARCH 93 *** VENDOR, TOTAL 00857 001-400-2101-4306 03/31/93 POLICE $625.00 01345 $3.1.50 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE R "DAVE*BANG ASSOCIATES, INC.' PLAYGRND EQUIP/SEAVIEW -2577 $31.50 70707 70707 70594 00033 43590 $0.00 04/01/93 00033 43590 $0.00 04/01/73 00048 43591 *0. 00 04/01/93 00048 43591 90.00 04/01/93 00058 43591 *0.00 :04/01/93 06383 43592 *0.00 04/01/93 00035 43593 $0.00 04/01/93 05029 125-400-8506-5402 00004 $1,850.70 CA -2577 06315 43594 03/17/93 CIP 86-506 /EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $50 $1,850.70 04/01/93 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:28:52 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/01/93 PAGE 0002 DATE 04/01/93 PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT INV/REF.,. PO M CHK N DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP •** VENDOR TOTAL $1, 850. 70 R BANK OF AMERICA 01195 001-400-1141-4201 00157. $1,677.10 BANK CHARGES/JAN 93 03/23/93 CITY TREASURER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT •** VENDOR TOTAL**4W*UWW************************n $1,677.10 *** R BLICKMAN, INC. 03092 001-400--4601-4201 01730 $49.00: THEATRE TECH/3-28-93 03/29/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT VENDOR TOTAL **n****r**********n*n $49.00 R • BUTLER BOXES !. STAKES STAKES/TIES/H. B. RELEAF 12911. 03772 ' 001-300--0000--3903 00305 $440 53 03/11/91 610002 03897 43595 f0.00 04/01/93 06382 43596 $0.00 04/01/93 12911 063:'6 /CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT $442.43 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************11-04******* *****1**** ****4* $440.53 R JEANNE*CARUSO 03293 001-400-2101-4316 01003 $66.14 REIMS MATERIALS/SPR 93 03/24/93 POLICE /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************n****** 1* •66.14 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-2101-4311 01608 $572.49 MISC CHARGES/MAR-93 03/31/93 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL*****nnMna***************.**M**n***44*** $572.49 D. A.R E. AMERICA D. A. R. E. ITEMS *** VENDOR TOTAL 04299 001-400-2101-4305 01950 47446 02/23/93 210004 POLICE $491.87 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ***************n**************************M*** $491.87 43597 04/01/91 06172 4.3998 $0.00 04/01/93 00313 $0 00 43599 04/01/93 47446 06144 43600 $508. 23 04.01/93 R DATA SAFE 00156 001-400-1206-4201 01103 $184.50 00015 TAPE STORAGE/MAR 93 . 03/31/93 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 •** VENDOR TOTAL $184.50 R - EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 02.840 0017400-1208-4201 00980 $284 30 • 006M25124 00325 METER USE/JAN 93 25124 03/07/93 GEN APPROP /CONtRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 43601 04/01/93 43602 04/01/93 411. • • 410 • • • • • tay FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:28:•52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/01/93 VND k ACCOUNT NUMBER TON M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0003 DATE 04/01/93 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 02840 001-400-1208-4201 00981 3298.00 006M25124 00325 43602 MAINT/FEB 93 25124 03/07/93 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/01/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL :.**e*******************************************************4*******4* R . ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY LEASE'PMT/APRIL 93 *** VENDOR TOTAL *582.30 0.2354 .001-400-3103-6900 00130 *1736.78 4987 03/22/93 ST MAINTENANCE /LEASE PAYMENTS *******************4************************************ $1,736.78 R FREDERICK R.*FERRIN 04503 001-400-1201-4316 00087 MON EXPENSE/MARCH 93 03/31/93 • CITY MANAGER *20.00 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TO.TAL.******************************************************************** R FESTIVAL OF ARTS/LAGUNA BEACH TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP *** VENDOR TOTAL R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX CHARGES/MARCH 93 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX CHARGES/MARCH 93° R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX CHARGES/MARCH 93 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX CHARGES/MARCH 93 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX CHARGES/MARCH 93 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX CHARGES/MARCH 93 R . GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX CHARGES/MARCH 93 • 03379 001-400-4601-4201 01729 03/31/93 COMM RESOURCES 00013 001-400-1121-4304 00617 03/31/93 CITY CLERK 00015 03/31/93 00015 03/31/93 00015 03/11/93 00015 03/31/93 001-400-1131-4304 00433 CITY ATTORNEY 001-400-1141-4304 00636 ' CITY TREASURER 00.1-400-1201-4304 00688 CITY MANAGER 001-400-1202-4304 00688 FINANCE ADMIN 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00698 03/31/93 PERSONNEL ' *20. 00 $1,000.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $1, 000. 00 $3.35 /TELEPHONE *0.71 /TELEPHONE *2. /TELEPHONE' 80 *1.18 /TELEPHONE S. 34 /TELEPHONE *4.38 /TELEPHONE LONE 00013 001-400-1206-4304 00616 *3.55 03/31/93 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 4987 00043 $0.00 43603 04/01/93 02178 43604 30.00 04/01/93 06396 43605 $0.00 04/01/93 00330 43607 $0.00 04/01/93 00330 43607 $0.00 04/01/93 00330 43607 $0.00 04/01/93 • 00330 .43607 *0.00 04/01/93 00330 43607 $0.00 04/01/93 • 00130 43607 *0.00 04/01/73 00330 43607 $0.00 04/01/93 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:28:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITU OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/01/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL *410 *,4*******0****************KM************************#********* *0* R JEFFREY*HOCKANSON CITE PAYMENT REFUND PAGE 0005 DATE 04/01/93 INV/REF PO k CHK N AMOUNT UNF.NC DATE EXP $196.00 05100 110-300-0000-3302 50469 $20.00 03/23/93 /COURT FINES/PARKING VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************* VERONICA*HORTON SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR $20.00 04264 001-400-4601-4221 00164 $70.00 03/24/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CITY OF*INGLEWOOD WP 5.1 TRNG/FERRIN/DUKE 22.68 R CITY OF*INGLEWOOD LOTUS TRNG/M. TERCERO • 2268 R R R R R CITY OF* TNGLEWOOD W. P. 5.1 TRNG/TERCERO R CITY OF*INGLEWOOD WP 5 1 TRNG/VANOLF 2.268 R CITY OF*INGLEWOOD CITV OF*INGLEWOOD W P 5.1 TRNG/COPELAND 2268 CITY OF*INGLEWOOD TRNG/LAWRENCE/FEHSKENS 2268 CITY OF*INGLEWOOD TRNG/TING/HIRSH CITY OF*INGLEWOOD TRNG/RANDY BROOK 2268• 2268 $70.00 00796 001-400-1201-4316 00086 $100.00 03/26/93 CITV MANAGER /TRAINING 00796 001-400-1202-4316 00449 03/26/93 $50.00 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING 00796 001-400-1202-4316 00450 03/26/93 $50.00 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING 00796 001-400-1207-4316 00123 03/26/93 BUS LICENSE W450.00 /TRAINING 00796 001-400-4101-4316 00260 $100.00 03/26/93 PLANNING /TRAINING 00796 001-400-4201-4316 00307 03/26/93 BUILDING $100.00 /TRAINING 00796 110-400-3302-4316 00229 $50.00 2268 03/26/93 PARKING ENF /TRAINING WP 5.1 TRNG/VANOLE 2268 00796 705-400-1209-4316 00051 03/26/93 $25.00 LIABILITY INS /TRAINING 00796 705-400-1217-4316 00035 03/26/93 $25.00 WORKERS COMP /TRAINING *4* VENDOR•TOTAL_*************p***********K************M*******************.********** 4650.00 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-202-0000-2021 00378 $5.48 DISCOUNT OFFERED 03/31/93 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 06406 43611 $0.00 04/01/93 06375 43612 *0.00 04/01/73 2268 05522 43613 *0.00 04/01/93 2268 05647 43613 $50.00 04/01/93 2268 05630 43613 $0.00 04/01/93 2268 04333 4.3613 $0.00 04/01/93 2268 05811 43613 $0.00 04/01/93 2268 04333: 43613 $0.00 04/01/93 2268 05630 43613 $0.00 04/01/91 2268 05522 43613 $0 00 04./01/93 2268 05522 43613 $0.00 04/01/91 00337 43614 $0.00 04/01/93 • • • • • • • • • • • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:28:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX CHARGES/MARCH 91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX/TELE CHCS/ MAR 93 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX/TELE CHCS/ MAR 93 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX/TELE CHCS/ MAR 93 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX/TELE CHCS/ MAR 93 R' GTE 'CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED FAX/TELE CHCS/ MAR 93 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED FAX/TELE CHCS/ MAR 93 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX/TELE CHOS/ MAR 93 rw* VENDOR TOTAL •w********************` ***w* R JANET*HALE SPRING CLASS REFUND 51974 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/01/93 VND M • ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M • ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 03/31/93 00015 03/31/93 00015 03/31/93 001-400-1207-4304 00489 BUS LICENSE 001-400-2101-4304 01201 POLICE 001-400-4101-4304 00691 PLANNING 43.07 /TELEPHONE 4101.30 /TELEPHONE $8.38 /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00619 45.72 03/31/93 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 00015 03/31/93 00015 03/31/93,, 00015 03/31/93 00015 03/31/93 001-400-4202-4304 00750 PUB WKS ADMIN 001-400-4204-4321 00714 BLDG MATNT 001-400-4601-4304 00799 COMM RESOURCES 110-400-3302-4304 00710 PARKING ENF 05101 001-300-0000-3893 01313 03/23/93 JANET*HALE 05101 001-300-0000-3894 00173 SPRING CLASS REFUND 51974 03/23/93 453.55 /TELEPHONE PAGE 0004 DATE 04/01/93 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT LINENC DATE EXP 439.86 /BUILDING BAFETV/SECLIRIT 456.31 /TELEPHONE 41. 56 /TELEPHONE *291.06 435.00 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES 433.00 /OTHER RECREATION PROGRMS **w VENDOR TOTAL_************************11********r*******w********w*r*w*w*********** R HERMOSA ANIMAL HOSPITAL_ MISC CHARGES/MAR 93 . 00322 001-400-2101-4305 01951 03/31/93 POLICE 470.00 413.90 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES rw* VENDOR TOTAL***+****w*w*w*******w*****************r***********************+r***** R LQRI*HIGGINS SPRING CLASS. INSTRUCTOR $13.90 03404 001-400-4601-4221 00161 4196.00 • 03/24/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR 00330 43607 40.00 04/01/93 00330 43607 :40.00 04/01/93 00330 43607 40:00 04/01/93 00330 43607 40.00 04/01/93 . 00330 43607 40.00 04/01/93 00330 43607 40.00 04/01/93 00330 43607 40.00 04/01/93 00330 43607 40.00 04/01/93 51974 06365 43608 . 40.00 04/01/93 51974 06365 • 43608 40.00 04/01/93 00335 43609. 40.00 04/01/93 06372 43610. 40.00 04/01/93 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:29;52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/01/93 VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-202-0000-2022 00376 *5.48CR DISCOUNT TAKEN 03/31/93 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN PAGE 0006 DATE 04/01/93 INV/REF PO N CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-400-4204-4309 02604 $271.35 MISC CHARGES/MAR 93 03/31/93 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 105-400-2601-4309 00887$290.23 .MISC CHARGES/MAR 93 03/31/93 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 125-400-8506-4309 00064 $286.13 MTSC CHARGES/MAR 93 03/31/93 CIP 86-506 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****n*0***** ***warns******mit*** $847. 71 R SGT JOHN*KOEBSELL P.O. 9. T. MILEAGE *** VENDOR TOTAL *** R KOMPAN, INC 00629 . 001-400-2101-4312 02092 031.20 03/23/93 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 05026 125-400-8506-5402 00005 119,907.32 PLAYGROUND FOUIP/SF.AVIFW 4982 03/10/93 CIP 86-506 /EOUIFMENT-MORE THAN *50 VENDOR TOTAL***********i**********M*********M**4*NMII 1131.20 R DENNIS*LINDSEY 03708 001-400-4601-4221 00165 02,290.75 SOFTBALL LEAGUE DIRECTOR 03/23/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR *** VENDOR TOTAL******M************************************************************* 02.290.75 R LOS ANGELES CO TRANSPORTATION . 05096 146-400-3410-4201 00002 $1,000.00 CTY SHARE EIR/GREEN LINE 03/23/93 METRO GREEN LN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PP1VAt *** VENDOR TOTAL***4r**r*********r********n******4***************r*********s*******r R MANHATTAN FORD MISC. CHARGES FOR MARCH R MANHATTAN FORD MISC. CHARGES FOR MARCH $1, 000. 00 00337 43614 *0.00 04/01/93 00337 43614 40.00 04/01/93 00337 43614 *0.00 04/01/93 00337 43614 00.00 04/01/93 05932 43615 *0.00 04/01/93 4882 06316 09,907 33 43616 04/01/93 06369 43617 $0.00 04/01/93 05820 '43618 $0.00 04/01/93 00605 001-400-2101-4311 01609 *297.63 00346 43619 03/31/93 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *0.00 04/91/93 '00605 001-400-4202-4311 00251 :03/31/93 PUB WKS ADMIN $105.28 00346 43619 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 04/01/93 c • • • • • • • • • • • • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16:28:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0007 FOR 04/01/93 DATE 04/01/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $ AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK N DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP •** VENDOR TOTAL $402.91 R MERRIMAC'. PETROLEUM, INC. 03080 001-141-0000-1401 00217 $3.663.75 UNLEADED GAS/CITY YARD 30273 03/16/93. /GASOLINE INVENTORY *** VENDOR. TOTAL **4*****n*n*nig********************4********* $3,663.71 R MICHAELS 031.67: 001-400-4.601-4308 00812 $57.04 MISC CHARGES/MAR 93 071 03/31/93 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIAL.S *** VENDOR. TOTAL******n***4*******s*******n*******a******s*****r.******************** **• *57. 04 930273 06080 43670 $0.00 04/01/93 071 00347 $0.00 43621 04/01/93 R KIM*MITCHELL 00522 • 001--400-2101-4312 02091 $31.20 05931 43622 P.O.S.T. MILEAGE 03/23/93 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE, POST $0.00 04/01/93 VENDOR TOTAL R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION GASOLINE CHCS Fon MARCH *** VENDOR TOTAL **** $31.20 00388 170-400-2103-4310 00103 $31.34 03/31/93 SPEC INVESTGTNS /MOTOR FUELS AND LURES $31.34.. R MONARCH BROOM 00084 001-400-3103-4309 01498 $257.64 . MISC CHARGES/MAR 93 03/31/93 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL. $257.64 NATIONAL REC ►r PARK ASSOC. 00880 001-400-4601-4315 00124 $18.00' DUES/M. ROONEY 18093 03/23/93 COMM RESOURCES /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL **************n*n*** * * $18.00 R JOHN*O'ROURKE 04618 OOt-400-4601--4221 00159 $147.00 . SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR 03/22/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR *** VENDOR TOTAL' **********n***n***n******* *****4*,* *147. 00 00390 43621 $0.00 04/01/93 00349 43624 $0.00 04/01/93 0018093 06371 $0.00 .43625 04/01/93 06367 43626 $0.00 04/01/93 R . OLIVER, BARR & VOSE 02892 001-210-0000-2110 05264 $550.00 02180 LEGAL SERV/CATV/FEB 93 02/28/93 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 43627 04/01/93 • • • ,`. • • FINANCE-SFA34o TIME 16:28:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R OLIVER, DARR & VOSE LEGAL SERV/FEB 93 R OLIVER, DARR & VOSE LEGAL SERV/FEB 93 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 04/01/93 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ k ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00771 02/28/93 CITY ATTORNEY 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00772 02/28/93 420001 CITY ATTORNEY PAGE 0008 DATE 04/01/93 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $10.767.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAt $762.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL*********.*****4*4**********4******4********************************* R PACIFIC EQUIP & IRRIGATION CUSHMAN PARTS *** VENDOR TOTAL R PACTEL CELLULAR - LA MOBILE PHONE: CHOS/MARCH *** VENDOR TOTAL PEP. BOYS 00406 110-400-3302-4311 00866 03/23/93 PARKING ENF $12.079.50 $1,685.96 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $1,685.96 03209 170-400-2103-4304 00087 4399.85 03/31/93 9PEC INVEBTOTNS /TELEPHONE 00608 001-400--2201-4311 MISC.CHGS FOR MARCH 03/31/91 FIRE *** VENDOR TOTAL *********************+******************lr************************** 11399. 85 00466 $50.28 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *•• R MAR ILYN*PR IMM SPRING CLASS REFUND VENDOR TOTAL 54285 • R RED LION HOTEL HOTEL/D. RICKEY 05084 001-300-0000-3893 03/08/91 * *50.28 01312 $28.00 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSEa 03918 001-400-2101-4312 02094 01/23/93 POLICE $28.00 $357.50 /TRAVEL. EXPENSE • POST *** VENDOR:TOTAL *4*****4**************n*44.4444*444*4*4.********.***4*44**4**4 **44* R OFCR DAVID4RICKEY MFALS/P 0. S.T. CLASS 00949 001-400-2101-4312 02093 03/23/93 POLICE $357.50 $135.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE . P097 ••* VENDOR TOTAL*******4**********4*******4****M*******************04404*+144****4*** $135.00 SYLVIA*ROOT SEC SERV/3-16-93 316 04061 001-400-4102-4201 00404 $136 25 03/22/93 P1,ANNIN9 COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 02180 43627 $0 00 04/01/93 02180 43627 $0.00 04/01/93 05181 $2,116.05 43628 04/01/93 00353 43629 $0.00 04/01/93 00356 43630 $0.00 04/01/93 54285 06341 $0.00 43631 04/01/93 05934 43632 $0.00 04/01/93, 05933 43633 $0.00 04/01/93 116 05819 $0.00 43634 04/01/93 4 w 40 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 16.28:52 PAY VENDOR NAME 'DESCRIPTION w*w VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA.BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0009 FOR 04/01/93 DATE 04/01/93 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT INV/REF PO * r.41µ * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R DWAIN+ROGUE SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR www VENDOR TOTAL A136.25 02859 001-400-4601-4221 00163 4245.00 06374 43635 03/24/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PROR 40.00 04/01/93 ***w******w***1*** *M**w*****w**w**********w**** $245.00 R LAURA*ROZTI 04.623 001--400-4601-4221 00166 4226.80 06376 43636 SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR 03/24/93 -COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PROR 40.00 04/01/93 i www VENDOR TOTAL 4226.90 `� R SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY 04889 001-400-2101-4312 02095 4252.00 05935 43637 TUITION/D. RICKEY 03/23/93 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE • POST $0.00 04/01/93 +++ VENDOR TOTAL $252. 00 R SARCO INC. 05093 001-400-2101-5401 00079 42.775.00 57967 06161 43638 GAS MASKS/POLICE 57967 03/19/93 POLICE /EQUIP -LESS THAN 4500 42.775.00 04/01/93 w++ VENDOR TOTAL SHORELINE FRINTING PUS'CARDS/C. SWARTZ **w VENDOR TOTAL ****wwwNww*ww*w*****iiNw*************ww***w*****Nw**Wit *www • 42. 775. 00 03505 001-400-4201-4305 00846 427.06 9998 04280 43639 9998, 03/24/93 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $27.07 04/01/93 * 427. 06 R SIR SPEEDY 00361 001•-400-1207-4305 00299 4217.14 BUS LICENSE APPS 16999 03/18/93 BUS LICENSE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL w*• SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY MISC CHARGES/MAR 93 VENDOR TOTAL - 001.14 03/31/93 1141n**********w** 4217. 14 001-400-4601-4308 00811 $21.78 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS • $21.78 16999 04338 4217.14 43640 04/01/93 00362 43641 40.00 04/01/93 R SO. BAY CRIMINAL JUSTICE 05102 001--400-2101-4315 00232 425.00 06170 43642 DUES/V. STRASER 03/23/93 POLICE /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 04/01/93 • • FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 16:28:52 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0011 lb FOR 04/01/93 DATE 04/01/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1,995.21 R BROOKE*WHITE 0!099 001-300-0000-3893 01311 $35.00 51970/SPO2 06380 43649 SPRING CLASS REFUND /SP02 03/25/93 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 04/01/73 *** VENDOR TOTAL**************1t********************** ***** $35. 00 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001--400-1208-4201 00979 $280.39 036785902. 00007 43650 METER. USE/FED 93 85902 03/18/93 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0 00 04/01/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************************** $280.38 *** PAY CODE TOTAL****P**11*.****il*****************.*W.11********************1f*M******* $55,574.07 *** TOTAL WARRANTS ******************.* * $55.574.07 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVTR'n ^Y TNF WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGES. %_ .TO . - ''''' ''. Y.. I•ANF REGISIFP ten .. 14//f3IUNnc enc AVn:I AE FOR PAYMENT, AND AHE IN UUN1 n.:n,avCE ult(:E i. r �Y ANC R -r.--11 N� ne.c '3 iN .106 April 7, 1993 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council April 13, 1993 CANCELLATION OF WARRANTS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the warrants listed below. #043437 - 3/15/93 - The Precinct - $2,155.58 - Account Number 001- 202-0000-2021, 43.99; 001-202-0000-2022, <43.99>; 170-400-2103- 5403, 2,155.58. Manual check issued on 3/12/93. Vendor required hand check. #43565 - 3/25/93 - South Bay Cancer & Health - $28.00 - Account 001-300-0000-3893. Vendor entered under wrong vendor code. Warrant never mailed. Concur: ..� 441. Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager . Wo an Treasurer Noted for fiscal impact Viki Copeland Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 27, 1993 April 8, 1993 City Council Meeting of April 13, 1993 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Consideration of fee waiver for National Lifeguard Championships Approval of litigation defense firm list Greenbelt landscaping recommendation from Parks & Recreation Comm. May 11, 1993 Revision to smoking ordinance Lease renewal for South Bay Free Clinic (Room 7) Lease renewal for Project Touch (Rooms 3 and 11) May 20, 1993 1993-94 Budget and CIP study session May 23, 1993 June 3,1993 1993-94 Budget and CIP study session June 8, 1993 Lease renewal for L.A. County Bar Association (Dispute Resolution Service) June 22, 1993 July 13, 1993 July 27, 1993 August 10, 1993 Community Resources Risk Manager Public Works Director Community Community Resources Dir. Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. 7 Lease renewal for Hope Chapel (Rooms 5 and 6A) Community Resources Dir. August 24, 1993 September 14, 1993 Lease renewal for Association for Retarded Citizens Community Resources Dir. Lease renewal for Easter Seal Society Community Resources Dir. Lease renewal for South Bay Center for Counseling Community Resources Dir. September 28, 1993 December , 1993 Lease renewal for Project Touch (Room C) Community Resources Dir. ***************************************************************** UPCOMING ITEMS NOT YET CALENDARED Initiated by Party Staff Caltrans utilitymaintenance agreement Public Works Dir. Staff Ordinance.. for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Council Text amendment to allow tempor- arily oil derrick over 35'height Text amendment to oil code to redefine grade at finsihed grade of oil storage tank Staff Confirmation of oil development C.U.P. approved by P.C. Request for Council guidance and prioritization for the development of the Biltmore site park Council Review Bldg/Zoning Code changes to improve liveability Council Revision of HBMC provisions per- taining to construction of public street improvements (Public Hrg) Staff Request for approval of Tenant/ Users Liability Insurance Program (TULIP) and establishment of an Public Works Dir. Planning Director Planning Director Planning Director Comm. Resources Dir. Planning Director Public Works Dir.. Staff Staff Staff Council Staff A:FUTURE administrative fee for processing TULIP applications Personnel Director Final public hearing for Land Use Element Payroll software selection Firefighters' Report on Extension MOU Approval beach foot patrol of Auditors contract Planning Director Finance Director Negotiating team Public Safety Dir. Finance Director Special study re. standards for small lots Planning Director Special study of the zoning ordi- nance and enforcement ordinance re. parking in front yard setback Planning Director Special study and text amendment to Sec. 1160(d) re. driveway grades Planning Director School District request for Grounds Maintenance provided by the City Comm. Resources Dir. April 6, 1993 Honorable Mayor City Council Meeting and Members of the of April 13, 1993 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMISA BEACH Attached is report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of March 1993. This is the most current available investment information. Respectfully submitted, . Workman Treasurer NOTED: Frederick R. Fe rin City Manager ld INSTITUTION TOTAL INVESTMENT REPORT - MARCH 1993 DATE OF DATE OF INVESTMENT MATURITY ASKING PRICE MARKET VALUE INTEREST LAIF BALANCE 3/1/93 Maturity Maturity BALANCE 3/31/93 LACPIF Railroad Right -of -Way Account BALANCE 3/1/93 Investment BALANCE 3/31/93 CORPORATE NOTES: Ford Motor Credit Co. Investment U.S. TREASURY BOND Investment Investment Investment INVESTMENT TOTAL SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST BALANCE 2/1/93 Adjustment BALANCE 2/28/93 $7,940,000.00 (250,000.00) (1,000,000.00) $6,690,000.00 $1,355,945.55 84,330.00 3/26/93 $1,440,275.55 $500,000.00 05/19/88 $1,005,937.50 S989,687.50 1,008,437.50 $11,634,338.05 09/14/90 12/03/92 02/18/93 $528,048.50 21,620.63 02/28/93 $549,669.13 03/17/93 03/24/93 02/10/93 4.649% 3.40% 05/20/93 $ 500,000.00 $ 502,455.00 9.10% 06/30/94 11/30/97 01/31/98 $1,005,937.50 $1,061,560.00 8.50% S 989,687.50 S 997,810.00 6.24% 1,008,437.50 998,490.00 5.625% 8.40% CHICAGO TITLE BALANCE 12/01/92 BALANCE 12/31/92 TRUSTEE TOTAL GRAND TOTAL Respectfully Submitted, 511,921.08 S12,084.52 S561,753.65 512,196,091.70 ______________ Joph 13Ll1iorkman qty Treasurer March 23, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council -�' C.‹ -e. At 72ZL.,.j.,4.„,/ Regular Meeting of April 13, 1993 LEGENDS OF VOLLEYBALL - 6 -MAN TOURNAMENT Recommendation It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission that Council, approve the following request from Legends of Volleyball, Inc. for a professional beach volleyball tournament to be held on the Pier Courts on September 12, 1993 and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached contract. Date: Group: Tournament: Sponsor: Fees/charges: Background September 12, 1993 Legends of Volleyball Inc. Legends of Volleyball Reebok $5,079.50 (1 -day) The Community Resources Department received a Special Event Permit Application from Legends of Volleyball Inc. for the aforementioned event (see attached application). The request of this 6 -man tournament would mark its 3rd appearance in Hermosa Beach. This event was held in 1989 as a 1 -day event and in 1990 as a 2 -day event. For 1993, a 1 -day event is requested that would be televised on Prime Ticket Network. Analysis Legends of Beach Volleyball has been a successful tournament the years it has taken place in Hermosa Beach (last year they held the tournament in Redondo Beach). While the Commission and staff are cognizant of Council's expressed sentiment to hold the number of these events to the current levels (3 pro tournaments), this request seemed worthy of Council consideration for the following reasons: 1) The "Legends" are older volleyball players of notoriety and will enhance the City's reputation as a premiere volleyball location; 2) provide a revenue of approximately $5,000 to the City's general fund; 3) the tournament date follows the summer months and; 4) this is a smaller tournament which expects approximately 2,000 people in attendance; and 5) the title sponsor is not associated with alcohol (Reebok). The date requested for this tournament (Sept. 12) follows the Mens Pro Tournament (Aug. 27, 28, 29th) and the Fiesta de las Artes (Labor Day Weekend) which staff presented to the Commission. Unfortunately, the Legends (who work with Olympic and college players) could not adjust the date to allow for a respite between events. The Commission thought that the one day event would be welcomed by merchants after the peak season and (due to the reduced beach crowds) would not place an undue impact on the downtown area. le Projected Fiscal Impact: Permit Fees: Police Fees Film Permit Fees Business License Banner Permit Co-sponsor Fees ATTACHMENTS: $1,627.00. 1,434.00 1,084.75 233.00 200.75 500.00 $5,079.50 1. Permit application and site plan 2. Contract Concur: ney, Director Counity Resources Dept. i Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Respectfully submitted, Linda J. Esslinger Recreation Specialist Community Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal; Impact: Viki Copeland, Director Finance Dept. City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 318-0280 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION Organization's flame: //LLI:y4e4- s vc . Profit )( Non -Profit Hon -profit Number Organization's Address: /3_38 /0)1`,57,2cz-r— 6 a� j14/..,e4( Phone Number(s): .3i0 3 2 ; 76 Zip Code 9G>A Contact Person and Title: 6-46S /1144)47, ca4ec 2" Contact Person's Address: Zip Code Daytime Phone Number: 5411t ' Evening Phone Number: Brief Description of Event( &'Z2 C/4 -/-it/ 9gfd.-")-t ��"�5" C �'x�/'L-cel (�.i•!Gx) x�� • i' -e, Date(s) of Event: ��lti SST /02.7',1 J 3 Location(s) of Event: Niite- vY� Set-up Time: Time Event isto Come Mm MMMMM•.W.o....MMMWMarW '. 1111..A.,.,iU 111'1 • 1 • 1 1 1 1 ... Number of Participants (Including volunteers): / J Anticipated Number of Spectators: ,), fr-c._z-�, Number of Vehicles Involved and tion Used: 0) %,CL 4-r 0<<-.4..�� , • r SCS/ .44Cr 0774,Jc?6, Ct�__ 7 a �w�y Celt r Cc, % "1 -SLC .%Clc . A �s1V c'[�/ !,..27.--L— —C „.„,� ''1-(1'17.1 • Description of Set-up for this Events ,`� a�Jl�<<�-(' S• — Additional Information or Special Requestspfi ' LO �ivtrA�sSi�•x. G^,S'•-�,r ?tet/ i= .� �'� <<,01� • st�i , r./ es -14 ' !e. • � ;u4.�;' 5� 2.0-a, erg' /•;;i. rf.•'- �1�C'1 r �t�Gr.1r� 4..74,C;,'� //-c cu?-, ' CCS F (. '( e� ��%r'J�C Lc.r./ L) fjc�C•�iC`vn_ e .t / 7` 74 a 7'../ filr- X t.,--12-,="41&- /- , a p •wA T74� vi1 d _ Fees, Charges and Other Requirements: Police Costs Fire Costs Business License $ Public Works Coats $ Processing Fee $ $ Other Costs Total Due $ Refundable Damage Deposit $ Damage Deposit is due: Balance of fees incurred are due: Insurance Required: Yes No Date Received Unless greater or lessor coverage is requested, applicant agrees to furnish the City of Hermosa beach evidence of $1 million. comprehensive general liability insurance in the form of a certificate, covering the entire period of this permit, naming the City of Hermosa Beach and its employees as additional insured. Expiration Date Permittee waives claims against the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees, for fees or damages caused by, arising out of, or in any way connected with the exercise of this permit. APPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND TO HAINTAIH IN GOOD CONDITION AND TO RETURN SAID PREMISES IN THE SAME CONDITION AS THEY WERE BEFORE SAID USE. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE AND COMPLETE TO TIIE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ALL FEES, CHARGES AND OTHER NECESSARY MATERIAL WILL BE PAID AND/OR FURNISHED TO TIIE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES AS MUTUALLY AGREED TO BY BOTH PARTIES. Company 'tepresenta' Permit to be processed through City Council: Yes No If YES, Council's decision: Application is invalid without the following signatures: Department of Community Resources Police Department Authorization Fire Department Authorization if Required Date Date Date Life Guard Authorization Date Needed on all Water Events . PAUL MITCHELL TENT TV VIP TENT PLAYERS TENT TO PIER 0 0 BLEACHERS PLAYER BOXES ■ MAIN COURT TV THE STRAND 0 0 REEBOK DISPLAY Sports Chalet 1993 REEBOK LEGENDS SITE LAYOUT SCALE: 1" = 20 ft. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT CONTRACT This contract is entered into on April 13, 1993, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between Legends of Volleyball, Inc., a Sporting Events Promoter, and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY), with regard to a 6 -MAN PROFESSIONAL VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT ON SEPTEMBER 12, 1993. The following conditions will apply: FEES Permit fee shall be $1,627. The $500 deposit will be applied toward the $1,627 permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the City. All predetermined costs -fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the Tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the City. SECURITY The City of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the Tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one representative of LEGENDS OF VOLLEYBALL, INC. LEGENDS shall provide no less than ten security officers. Said officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other Tournament staff. A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the Tournament for a pre -event briefing. The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of the City's alcohol ordinance. The City of Hermosa Beach shall provide Police Officers for the event as,follows for each day of tournament, 10:00 AM - 6:00 PM: 1 1 Sergeant 4 Officers or as many officers as deemed necessary by Public Safety Director. Cost of officers shall be assumed by LEGENDS. CLEAN-UP LEGENDS shall provide a professional maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the Tournament: . The Beach and Strand, from 8th Street to 15th Street. . Pier Avenue, from Strand to Monterey Avenue. The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the trash collected outside the City each day of the Tournament. All maintenance work is to be concluded by 8:00 PM each evening. LEGENDS shall provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: . Beach (impacted area) . Strand (impacted area) or additional trash receptacles as needed LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES LEGENDS shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of tournament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. INSURANCE LEGENDS shall, not later than 30 days prior to the event, provide the CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing personal injury and property damage liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. Said insurance shall not be cancelled or altered without 30 day notice in writing to the City and County. LEGENDS insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and the CITY and county and their insurers shall not be required to contribute. LEGENDS agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of the event promotion firm/sponsor its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors; with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to event. ADVERTISING Signage regarding the CITY'S alcohol ordinance shall be required of LEGENDS. City staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for posting. City of Hermosa Beach shall permit two street banners to be posted for tournament. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of LEGENDS. CITY shall permit LEGENDS to display two large replicas of their product. City staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by LEGENDS to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of LEGENDS. PARKING LEGENDS shall be required to announcements indicating 1) where there is free parking and 2) that the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. SPECIAL EVENTS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events requested to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. If LEGENDS desires any County services, they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by LEGENDS. The CITY shall allow access to Tournament site for set-up forty-eight (48) hours prior to Tournament. The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue, Beach Drive to the Strand for Tournament staff and film equipment parking. At no time may LEGENDS block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at anytime by the CITY. 3 The CITY shall allow LEGENDS the opportunity to sell official concession items per certain conditions. No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID POLICY. MISCELLANEOUS LEGENDS RESPONSIBILITIES LEGENDS shall provide as many portable port -a -johns as determined necessary by City staff. LEGENDS shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. LEGENDS shall be responsible for all prize money, volleyball equipment, sound system and personnel necessary for conducting such a tournament. Event shall be conducted in compliance with City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances on file at the Dept. of Community Resources. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH City Attorney Mayor DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES Director Hermosa Beach City Clerk Date Date Date D e Date 1993 PRO VOLLEYBALL EVENTS MAY S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 4 - MAN PRO C.E. SPORTS Q 4 -MAN 25 26 27 28 29 FIESTA DE LAS AR TES 30 RESTADE LAS AR PRO SPORTS 31 FIESTA DE LAS ARTES 1993 PRO VOLLEYBALL EVENTS JUNE S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1a PRO WOMEN WPVA G PRO WOMEN WPVA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 PLEASE NOTE- NO VOLLEYBALL EVENTS PROPOSED FOR JULY, 1993 1993 PRO VOLLEYBALL EVENTS AUGUST S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4' 5 6 SURF FESTIVAL 7 SURF FESTIVAL 8 SURF FESTIVAL 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 •. 23 24 25 26 ©7 MEN'S PRO TOURNEY G8 MEN'S PRO TOURNEY ©9 MENS PRO TOURNEY 30 31 f 1993 PRO VOLLEYBALL EVENTS SEPTEMBER S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 FIESTA DE LAS AR TES 5 RESTADE LAS ARTES 6 FIESTA DE LAS AR TES 7 8 9 10 11 LEGENDS PRO TOURNEY 1© LEGENDS PRO TOURNEY 13 14 15 • 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 March 31, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting The Hermosa Beach City Council April 13, 1993 REQUEST FOR 30 DAY EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT OF ONE COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council extend for thirty days (30) days the temporary appointment of one Community Services Officer. Background: There is currently one vacant Community Services Officer (formerly General Services Officer) which is being filled on a temporary basis pending completion of current reorganization which is in progress. Analysis: Section 2-33 of the Hermosa Beach City Code precludes a temporary appointment of an individual to a permanent Civil Service position for more than six months without approval from the City Council every thirty days. Respectfully submitted, Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director wp/extend Concur: ary Rooney Assistant City Manager Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council /.� April 4, 1993 Regular Meeting of April 13, 1993 STRAND BIKEWAY CHANGE ORDER #1 Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Change Order #1. Background: At the approval of plans and call for bids, the Council directed the provision for the placement of the electroliers on the wall and the installation of trash receptacles within the wall as an alternate bid. At that time a count was made of both electroliers and trash receptacles and the project was bid on the basis of what existed in the field (30 electrolier-trash receptacle combinations and 6 electroliers-only). Since 5 of the six electrolier locations which do not have a trash receptacle are located in the central portion of the Strand (between 10th Street and 14th Street) where activity is the most intense, it appears that all electrolier locations should have a trash receptacle. Exhibits: Change Order #1 Fiscal Impact: Increase of $3,852.00 Aly s bmitted, /4/ . Concur: Charles McDonald Director of Pudic Works ty/cmcol Frederick Ferrin City Manager • . . } Viki Copeland Director of Finance - 1 - li City of`�ermosa 1r3. each ► V _. Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 CHANGE ORDER PROJECT TITLE Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Path, PROJECT NUMBER CIP 90-144 CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 1 CONTRACTOR EMMA CORPORATION Show as separate numbered paragraphs the following: 1. Reason for change. 3. Change in contract cost. 2. Description of change. 4. Change in contract time. 1. To add six additional trash receptacles to the proposed thirty trash receptacles shown in the 'plans. This will provide a trash receptacle at every opening in the new strand wall. 2. The change is to add a trash receptacle at six locations where no trash re- ceptacle was shown in the approved plans. 3. Change in contract cost. a) Delete 6 locations with electrolier only (Bid Item #5). (6)($1,600.00) = $9,600.00 b) Increase 6 locations with a combination trash receptacle and electrolier (Bid Item #3). (6)($2,135.00) = $12,810.00 c)Increase in contract cost to pay for reinforcing steel already ordered, bent coated that can no longer be used at the six locations (New contract pay Item #8). d) Total change in contract cost due to change order No. 1. $12,810.00 - $9.600.00 + $642.00 = $3,852.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT TOTAL APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS TOTAL PENDING CHANGE ORDERS TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER ADJUSTED CONTRACT TOTAL Cost Time $659,100 75 Days -0- 0 -0- 0 3;852 0 $662,952 75 Days (Assuming all change orders approved) RECOMMENDED BY '!' - 4e444ATE (Pro • t Engine ) REVIEWED BY ; /�s�/ DATE APPROVED BY 4" BGG' t.- DATE (Director. of P,blic Works) ACCEPTED BY DATE (Contractor) 3/29/ 93 (/93 • April 6, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 13, 1993 STRAND BIKEWAY - CHANGE ORDER #2 Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Change Order #2. Background: During design of the project, cores were drilled at various locations in the existing pavement to determine the character, thickness, etc. of the pavement. In addition a 2' long section was cut at the joint where the pavement meets the cutoff wall which extends down into the sand at a 45 degree angle. The section includes about one foot of pavement and one -and -a -half feet of cutoff wall. When removed from its position it came out as one piece. The section will be available for the Council's inspection at the meeting. It was assumed that the pavement and cutoff wall were poured "monolithically", that is, one continuous pour, thus one piece of concrete. However, removal work has indicated that there is a weakened plane just below the angle. point where the pavement separates from the cutoff wall . The weakend plane was caused by a delay between pours of the two sections in the original construction. Analysis: Placing the wall on the isolated section of pavement would not be an advisable solution even though the isolated section would be doweled to the newly poured pavement. It would certainly be doubtful in the event of wave action in a storm. Therefor it is intended to remove all of the pavement and cutoff wall down to the weakened plane joint, place dowels in the cutoff wall and pour the new pavement over the cutoff wall enveloping the dowels previously placed. The wall will then be placed on top of the newly poured pavement. This change order is intended to apply only to the two portions of the project between Herondo Street and Eighth Street, also between 15th Street and 24th Street. Exhibits: Change Order #2. - 1 - • 1j Fiscal Impact: Increase of $40,902.00 Respecjfully supmitted, Concur: es McDo ald Director of blic Works ty/cmco2 2 Frederick Ferrin B 2ntoe, City Manager jila-r16.04.4(.// Viki Copeland Director of Finance • 4 City of 2-%rmosarl3each. ► — Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254.3885 CHANGE ORDER PROJECT TITLE STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH PROJECT NUMBER C I P 90-144 - CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 2 CONTRACTOR EMMA CORPORATION • Show as separate numbered paragraphs the following: 1. Reason for change. 3. Change in contract cost. 2. Description of change. 4. Change in contract time. SEE ATTACHED ORIGINAL CONTRACT TOTAL APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS TOTAL' PENDING CHANGE ORDERS TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER ADJUSTED CONTRACT TOTAL Cost Time 659,1(10 75 nays -o- o 3,852 0- 40,902 0 $703,854 75 Days (Assuming all change orders alooroved) RECOMMENDED BY REVIEWED BY APPROVED BY ACCEPTED BY I-/ tt /5-e4L`"' .DATE (Pro'-inee ) City ngine irector Public Works) (Contractor) 4- 7- 93 DATE DATE DATE --7-93 -/7/757 CHANGE ORDER FROM HERONDO STREET TO 8TH STREET AND FROM 15TH STREET TO 24TH STREET 1. The reason for thischange order is to construct a stronger joint at a discovered weakened plane in the existing cut off wall. 2. The proposed construction is to remove the previously assumed continuous footing of the wall down to the weakened plane joint. Dowels would then be drilled into the cut off wall and a continuous slab would be poured over the cut off wall enveloping the dowels resulting in a stronger joint. 3. Change in contract cost. a) Remove an average 1.2 foot width of footing along the wall. the cost to be based on the original contract unit price for removal. ($.80/S.F.)(1.2 S.F./L.F.)(5,100 L.F.) = $ 4,896.00 b) Placing new concrete pavement based on original contract unit price. ($2.80/S.F.)(1.2 S.F./L.F.)(5,100 L.F.) = $17,136.00 c) Drilling 6" deep hole in the cut off wall.. This cost is offset by the pre- vious 6" horizontal hole drilling approved in the original contract. No charge = $ 0.00 d) Epoxy of dowel in the drilled hole. This cost is offset by the previous epoxy cost in original contract. No charge = $ e) Rebar 18" long. This cost is offset by the previous rebar cost in the original contract. 0.00 No charge = $ 0.00 f) Form work for west edge of new slab at the weakened joint of the cutoff wall. This is needed to control the cross slope of the new slab. New contract cost item #9 ($3.70/L.F.)(5,100 L.F.) = $18,870.00 Total change in contract cost due to change order $40,902.00 4. No change in contract time. ty/hbco2 2"x4 "FORM NE)/ WILL 4t PER PLAN NEW 44 A'EBAR f NEW CD/YC. !LAE 4t { /B" *4 EPDXY COATED REBAR' EPDXY /NTG EX/ST/NG L'!/TOFF WILL G "M/N. DRILLED HOLE 67X1429 D/KEJMY ANDPEDESTIf/AN PATI/ C/IANGE MDER /✓o. Z f/WOM //MONDO TO BTil5T -../57"%r7 TD Z4T",ST. 7 P,'1V•4 % LATE OTT EJUG/ EER RE Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council April 7, 1993 City Council Meeting of April 13, 1993 RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF AB 401 CONTAINER RECYCLING LEGISLATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution. BACKGROUND A request for a resolution of support for AB 401 was received from Californians Against Waste. ANALYSIS AB 401 would expand California's Beverage Container Recycling Act (AB2020) to include the more than 700 million wine, liquor and non -carbonated water containers sold in California. Please see the attached fact sheet for specific information. Concur: WG/rb ey, Acting City Manager Respectfully submitted ef6i)Alf.41"-- William Grove, Director of Building and Safety 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 .-RESOLUTION 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH IN SUPPORT OF AB 401 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach is committed to recycling and waste reduction plans and programs in order to meet the requirements of the California Integrated Waste Management Act (AB 939, 1989); and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 401 by Assembly Member Burt Margolin will provide a financial incentive and infrastructure for the collection for recycling of the more than 325,000 tons of wine and liquor containers littered and landfilled. in California annually; and WHEREAS, the total cost to local government in California for the collection and disposal of wine and liquor bottles is estimated at more than $20 million annually; and WHEREAS, in the months since consumer refund values were increased to two -for -a -nickel under California's beverage container recycling program recycling rates have _increased significantly; and WHEREAS, the enactment of AB 401 will assist the City of Hermosa Beach in meeting the objectives of the California Integrated Solid Waste Management and Recycling Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby: 1. Support Assembly Bill 401 2. Convey our support for AB 401 to Assembly Member Burt Margolin, our Assembly and State Senate representatives, Assemblymember Byron Sher, and the California League of Cities and County Supervisors Association of California. 3. Direct our legislative representative to join with representatives of the League of Cities, the County Supervisors Association of California, the Planning and -Conservation League and Californians Against Waste in working for the passage of AB 401. Passed, approved and adopted this day of , 1993. PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: (ILA_ gae CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY A 7 4�.IJ .J�1L Hrr: • u� • :�. 3E FM F.071 CAW fM13- APR ASI� Californians Against Wa &off _„ ;; Toward a Recycling Economy iGea,- • April 5, 1993 ter. � � � � i.r++•�t�j�7� TO:. Mayor & Councilmembers City of Hermosa Beach. FROM: Mark Murray, Legislative Representative RE.: City Support for AB (401) Container Recycling. Legislation We•would greatly appreciate -the support of the City of Hermosa 'Beach for Assembly Bill 401;:a. measure.that would expand the state's Bottle and Can recycling Law to include wine,. licquor,.and water containers, and thereby. increase their recycling, as well as increase funding for curbside recycling programs Enclosed is a .copy .of AB 401 by`Assembiy Member Burt Margolin, along • with a model resolution .in support of. the measure. Supporters of the bill include the League of.California Cities, the City of Los Angeles, the County of Sacramento, .as well as several other individual cities. The• bill is also•supported by Waste Management Inc, the City of $an Diego's curbside provider. :AB 401 is scheduled to be heard in the Assembly Natural Resources Committee on Monday., April 19.. We would greatly appreciate it:if. the City cculd communicate. it' support for the bill -by Wednesday, April 14, so that it will be refl'ected:.in the.bill analysis. • If you have any questions, -please give me a.call. You may also want to discuss it with Yvonne'Hunter from the League of Cities at 916--444--5790. ;Copies of your position should be sent to each of -your Assembly and .Senate representatives, Assembly Member .Byron Sher, Chair of the • Assembly Natural Resources. Committee, and.Assembly Member Margolin. Thank you for your attention to this issue • 926 J Stmt. Su to 606. Sar: w: 0,nto, Cat:lc-:aio, 95814 • P.0:'Eox 289, Sacrarnento, Ca cm:.a; 95312 ■ (916) 443-3317 • Fax (916) 443-391 SRTtfri R -C:ed p : to F otcct t19 Ezzviro iinnrlt . a FACT SHEET ON AB 401 (Margolin): LEGISLATION TO EXPAND CALIFORNIA'S BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING LAW CURRENT LAW: California's Beverage Container Recycling Act (AB 2020) places a 2 Yz cent refund value on all beer, soft drink and wine cooler containers, with a 5 cent refund value on containers 24 ounces or larger. 21/2 cents In 2 Yz cents Out Beverage Department of Producers "--2%' Conservation Rcycfers Consumers 1 Curbside Recycfers According to the California Department of Conservation, the recycling rate for beverage containers reached a record, overall 89 percent, in 1992. Pre -AE 2020 1989 Rates 1990 Rates 1991 Rates 1992 Rates Aluminum 41 % 84 76 85 94 Glass 14 45 57 71 78 PET Plastic >1 7 31 56 67 Bi -Metal >1 2 3 14 15 SUMMARY OF CONTAINER EXPANSION LEGISLATION. As proposed, AB 401 would expand the AB 2020 program, beginning March 1, 1994, to include the more than 700 million wine, liquor, and non -carbonated water containers sold in California. THE PROBLEM: According to data from the Department of Conservation, less than 15 percent of glass wine and liquor containers were returned for recycling, compared to a 78 percent recycling rate for glass beer and soft drink containers. • In 1992, it is estlmG ed that 335,000 -tons of glass wine and liquor bottles were littered or disposed of in California, at a total cost to local government of $19.5 million annualy. THE SOLUTION: • Expanding AB 2020 can result in an additional 250,000 tons of glass and plastic being recycled. • Expanding AB 2020 will save local government $15-20 million in avoided disposal costs, while generating S4-8 million in revenue for curbside recycling. ' Expanding AB 2020 was recommended by the Department of Conservation in a 1990 report to the legislature and again in a 1991 Department study on program effectiveness. Fact Sheet Prepared by Californians Against Waste, February 1993. CAl..tl'OIINIA 1.1 CISI,AT10I1F =l _9I ftrc:UI.AR Sti—tqlON ASSEMBLY BILL No. 401 Introduced by Assembly. Member Margolin February 10, 1993 An act to amend Section 14561 of; to add Sections 14560.2 and 14580.2 to, and to amend, repeal, and add Section 14504 of, the Public Resources Code, relating to beverage containers. LPCISLA'flvl; CQUNSI?i.'S l)ICPST' . AD 401, as introduced, Margolin. Beverage containers. (1) Under the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act, every beverage container sold or offered for sale in the state is required to have a minimum refund value! A distributor is required to pay a redemption payment for every beverage container sold or offered for sale in the state to the Department of conservation and the department is required to deposit these amounts in the California Beverage Container Recycling Fund. The money in the fund is continuously appropriated to the department for, the payment of refund values and processing fees. A violation of the act is a crime and the penalties for violations are deposited in the fund. "Beverage' is defined for purposes of the act, and wine and wine from which alcohol has been removed are excluded from the definition. This bill would, as of March 1, 1994, delete thofie exclusions. The bill would include within that definition of beverage, wine and fortified wines, distilled spirits, and noncarbonated water, except as specified. The bill would require the manufacturers of those Included beverages to pay the department a redemption payment for the beverage containers. The bill would require the department to deposit 1.19 on AB 401 —2— the redemption payments, processing fees, :nod nil civil penalties, fines, and other revenue received resulting from the inclusion of those beverages in the definition of beverage for pttrpores of the net into the California Beverage Contniner Refund Iruru1, %vhrch the bill would create. The bill would require that the money iii the fund bo available to the department for the payment of specified refund values and processing fees to processors and for related administrative costs, upon appropriation in the Budget Act. (2) The act requires a beverage manufacturer to indicate n specified message on every beverage container sold or offered for sale in the state. This bill would require manufacturers of wine, fortified wines, distilled spirits, or noncarbonated water beverages to indicate that message on every beverage sold in the stale on and after January 1, 1994. (3) The bill would impose n state -mandated local program by creating new crimes. (4) The California Constitution requires the stale to reimburse local agencies and school: districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Stntutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reirnbursetnont is required by this act for n specified reason. Vote: mnJority. Appropriation: no. fiscal committee: yes. State -inundated Iocel program: yes. 7iie people of the Stale o/.California do enact es follows: 1 SEC:I'ION 1. Section 14504 of the Public Resources 2 Code is amended to read: 3 14504. (a) "Beverage" means bear and other malt 4 beverages, wine and distilled ,spirit coolers, carbonated 5 mineral and soda waters, and similar carbonated soft G drinks in liquid Form which are intended for palinal 7 consumption. 8 1 (b) "Beverage" does not include wine, or wine froth 9 which alcohol has been removed In whole or in part, 10 whether or not sparkling or carbonated. 11 (c) "Soft drink" does not include 100 percent fruit PP 1 PP •J `.J l All 401 1 juice to which carbonation is added. 2 (d) This section Slinli beenrnc operfttive en January l i 3 4090 remain in effect until Alnrclr 1, 1994, nerd ns of that 4 ditto is rej penled, usiless'a later erincted sintute, which is tS erincted before March 1, 1994, deletes or extends thnt Q date. 7 SEC:. 2. Section 14014 is added to the Public Resources t3 Code, to rend: 9 14504. .(n) "Beverage" means' beer and other malt 10 beverages,wine and clistillccl spirit coolers, wine, fortified 11 wines, distilled spirits, carbonated mineral and soda 12 waters, and slimier carbonated soft drinks, and 13 nonentbonnted water. "l;evcrnge" does riot Inducts' 14 noncarbonated water served ht containers that are one iii gallon in size or larger. 10 (b) "Solt drink" does not include 100 percent fruit 17 juice to which carbonation is asides]. 18 (c) This section shall become operative on March 1, 19 1994. 20 SEC. 3. Section 1.45(30.2 is added to 1ha Public 21 Resources (ode, to rend: 22 14tS50.2. Notwithstanding any other provision of Inw, 23 on and after January 1, 1994, n beverage distributor of 24 wines, fortified wines, distilled spirits, or no»cnrbunntcd 2,5 water shall pay the department n redemption payment 20 for every beverage container containing those liquids 27 which is sold or offered for sale in the stole pursuant to 211 Section 14rif,) The department shall deposit all 29 redemption payments collected Inarsttanl to this section 30 in the California !leverage Col.itainer Refund Fund, 31 v'1,leh Shall be available to the department pursuant io 32 subdivision (b) of Section 14580.2. 33 SEC. 4. Section 145131 of the Public liesnurces Code Is 34 amended to read: 35 14561. (o) (1) A innnnfacturcr shall Clearly iudicttie. 36 011 every beverage eontnine'r sold or offered f'it sale by 37 that beverage nutnufncluter in this state the message 38 "CA Redemption Vohte2. or Vnitie," "California 39 Redemption Valito," "CA Cosh Behold," or C aliforeil 40 bash Behind," by either pritaliI11 or embossing the ss 1."al All 401 ---.4 -- 1 1 beverage container or by securely affixing a clear and 2 prominent stamp, label, or other device to the beverage 3 contnhte.r. 4 (2) On and after January 1- ; a manifaehirer may 5 effirz the message -'GA Gash er " 1fernie Gael, 6 #jefuncl—' en a beverage eefttiktner eeiel er offered for Bale 7 by that beverage reretrtttffteittreri instead of the rneeseg-e 8 frpeelfied ixt paragraph -(43; bit the . tmmr199age eltall be 9 affie in the manner preeeribed 4x3 peregraph ' 10 ) Any refillable beverage container sold oroffered 11 for sale is exempt from this subdivision. however, any 12 beverage manufacturer or container manufacturer may 13 place upon, or affix to, a refillable beverage container, 14 any message which they deem determine to be 15 appropriate relating to the refund value of the container: llt3 (b) On end after January 4 I099; a manufaeturer of 17 Wine and distilled spirit coeler beverages eh ill elearly 18 it,dieate en every eenteiner thereof eeid er offered fer 19 side by that beverage manufeetitrer in this shite the 20. message speeifteel in ettbdivisien by either printing or 21 embossing the beverage eerteiner er by securely aifirting 22 a elear end prernitt(ntt stempr label; er ether device to the 23 be* erege eenta4rter: On and ;after January 1, 1994, a 24 manufacturer of wine, fortified wines, distilled spirits, or 25 noncarbonated water beverages shall comply with 26 subdivision (n). 27 (c) No person shall offer to sell, or sell, to a consumer 28 a beverage container subject to subdivision (a) which has 29 not been labeled pursuant to this section, except for a 30 refillable beveragecontainer which is exempt from 31 labeling. 32 (d) On and- after January March 1, 1900 1994, no 33 person shall offer to sell, or sell , to a consumer a beverage 34 container subject to subdivision (b) which has not been 35 labeled pursuant to thio seeiion.subdivi,sion (n), except 35 for a refillable beverage container which is exempt from 37 labeling. 38 (e) The department may require that any beverage 39 container intended for sale in this slate be printed, 40 embossed, stamped, labeled, or otherwise marked with a 99 160 -- 5 --- All 401 1 universal product code or similar machine-renclable 2 indicia. 3 (1) Any container labeled with the message specified 4 in subdivision (a) er •} shall have the minimum 5 redemption payment established pursuant to Section 6 14560, . which shall be paid by the distributor to the 7 department itursuant to Section 14574. 8 SEC. 5. Section 14580.2 is added to the Public 9 Resources •Code, to road: 10 14560.2. (n) Notwithstanding any other provision of 11 this division, including, but not limited iv, Section 14580, 12 the department shall deposit all of the following amounts 13 into the Cnlifornin Beverage Container Refund Fund, . 14 which is hereby created in the State Treasury: 15 (1) Redemption payments paid pursuant to Section 16 14560 by distributors of all of the following beverages: 17 (A) Wine and fortified wines. 18 (1l) Distilled spirits. 19 (C) Noncarbonated water. 20 (2) Processing fees paid pursuant to Section 14575 by 21 manufacturers of the beverages specified in 22 subparagraphs (A) to (C), inclusive, of paragraph (1). 23 (3) All civil penalties, fines, and other revenire 24 received resulting from the inclusion of the bevernges 25 specified in subparagraphs (A) to (C), 'inclusive, of 26 paragraph (1) within the definition of. beverage for 27 purposes of this division. 28 (b) 'The money in the Caii(ortiirt lle.verrige Contnincr 29 Refund Fund shall be available to the dep irtnient, upon 30 appropriation in the Budget Act, for the payment to 31 processors of refund values and processing fees 32 established for each type of beverage container which 33 contains the beverages specified in subparagraphs (A) to 34 (C), inclusive, of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a), and For 35 the administration of this subdivision. 3G SEC. 6. No rcitnbutscrueni is required by this net 37 pursuant to Section 6 of Article X111 U of the California 3B Constitution because the only costs which may be" 39 incurred by a local ngency or school district will be 40 incurred because this net creates a new crime or 1 Infraction, changes the definition of a crime or infraction, 2 chntiges the penalty for n crime or inknction, or 3 ellrnbtntes n crime or infraction. Notwithstanding Section 4 17580 of the Government . Code, unless otherwise 5 specified in this net, the provisions of this net shall become 0 operative on the srune date that the act takes effect 7 pursuant to the California Constitution. April 01, 1993 City Council Meeting April 13, 1993 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 93-1088 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 88-932 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO FIRE FLOW FEES." Submitted for adoption is Ordinance -No. 93-1088, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of March 23, 1993, this ordinance was presented to Council for consideration, and was introduced by the following vote: AYES: Edgerton, Essertier, MayorWiemans NOES: None ABSENT: Benz, Midstokke ABSTAIN: None Elaine Doerflin Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager Clerk 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 93- 1088 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 88-932 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO FIRE FLOW FEES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach established a system in which improvements are made to the fire water flow protection system in order to increase the level of fire protection within the City; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that a relationship exists between new construction and the need to install, upgrade, and replace fire hydrants and other improvements to the fire protection water system to improve fire protection and prevent the spread of fires from building to building; WHEREAS, the City Council finds a direct relationship between new development in all zones of the City and the need for fire system improvements overall; WHEREAS, use of the fire truck is an integral part of fire protection and prevention of the spread of fires from building to building, as a part of the fire protection water system; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 88-932, Exhibit "A", is hereby amended to include as Item 5, "The two remaining Lease/Purchase payments of $39,770.24 each, for the 1990 Fire Engine, due respectively, May 29, 1993 and May 29, 1994." 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect thirty days after the date of its adoption. SECTION 3. That prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader., a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinance of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 13th day of April,_ 1993. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FO /. 1/ea( CITY ATTORNEY EXHIBIT "A" FIRE PROTECTION MEASURES SUBJECT TO FIRE PROTECTION FEE' 1. HYDRANTS 2. RISER CONNECTIONS FROM MAIN TO HYDRANT 3. NECESSARY VALVES AND ATTACHMENTS AS DETERMINED BY THE WATER COMPANY 4. REPAIRS TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS STREETS AND SIDEWALKS NECESSITATED BY THE INSTALLATION OF HYDRANTS, RISERS AND NECESSARY VALVES AND ATTACHMENTS. 5. THE TWO REMAINING LEASE/PURCHASE-PAYMENTS OF $39,770.24 EACH, FOR THE 1990 FIRE ENGINE, DUE RESPECTIVELY, MAY 29, 1993 AND MAY 29, 1994. 0-61-6--,11-•/,L0) 93'56 D -b ;;4&--!2.3 April 2, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of April 13, 1993 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE HERMOSA BEACH FIREFIGHTER'S ASSOCIATION Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Hermosa Beach Firefighter's Association for the term July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1994. Background: The previous Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Firefighter's Association expired July 1, 1992. The negotiated successor MOU, which has been ratified by the Firefighter's Association, establishes the wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment for the period July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1994. Analysis: Negotiated changes to the MOU include the following: 1. No Cost -of -Living increase in base salary; 2. A decrease in the "constant manning" requirement from a minimum of six to a minimum of five. Impact: Reduces overtime costs. 3. Increase the amount of hours of "Over -time comp" which an employee can accrue from 72 to 144. Impact: In lieu of receiving pay for overtime hours, allows the employee to accrue the time which can be used at a later date. 4. An amendment to the City's contract with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) to include a provision allowing employees to purchase up to four (4) years of service credit for previous military service. Impact: The employee is responsible for the costs associated with the purchase of the additional credit.. This cost could be in excess of $5,000 per year purchased. 5. Includes classification of Fire Captain as eligible for paramedic certification premium ($175/mo). Impact: No immediate fiscal impact since none of the current Captains are paramedic certified. Additional annual cost of $2,100 per certified Captain in future years. Benefit to City in having additional trained paramedic at incident scenes. 6. Increase in sick leave accrual from twelve (12) hours per month. 7. Decrease frequency of comprehensive to biennial. Impact: Savings of $3,600/yr.... ten (10) hours/month to medical exams from annual A copy of the Memorandum of Understanding is Personnel Office for review. Respectfully submitted: gir--/V49/9-2.4'e Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Concur: available in the ooney sistant City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH FIREFIGHTER'S ASSOCIATION GOVERNING THE CLASSIFICATIONS OF FIRE CAPTAIN, FIRE ENGINEER, FIREFIGHTER/PARAMEDIC, AND FIREFIGHTER WHEREAS, the Hermosa Beach Firefighter's Association members have elected to meet and confer with the City of Hermosa Beach on matters concerning wages, hours and working conditions; and, WHEREAS, the above personnel have selected certain individuals to represent them; and WHEREAS, Employee and Management representatives have jointly negotiated a Memorandum of Understanding which has been ratified by a majority vote of the members of the Firefighter's Association. Said Memorandum of Understanding is attached hereto as "Exhibit A"; and, WHEREAS, the Employee representatives and the City Manager have mutually agreed to recommend that the City Council adopt this Memorandum of Understanding. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESOLVES to enter into said Memorandum of Understanding to be dated April 14, 1993 and to be effective for the period July 1, 1992 through and including June 30, 1994. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof. in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the minutes of the meeting at which time same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 13th day of April, 1993. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: , City Attorney JULY 1, 1992 - JUNE 30, 1994 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE HERMOSA BEACH FIREFIGHTERS' ASSOCIATION A FORMAL MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SETTING FORTH THE HOURS, WAGES, AND WORKING CONDITIONS FOR EMPLOYEES REPRESENTED BY THE HERMOSA BEACH FIREFIGHTERS' ASSOCIATION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE HERMOSA BEACH FIREFIGHTERS, ASSOCIATION ARTICLE 1 - PREAMBLE This Memorandum of Understanding has been entered into pursuant to the laws of the State of California and the City of Hermosa Beach, hereinafter referred to as the City, and has been executed by the City Manager on behalf of the City, and the Hermosa Beach Firefighters, hereinafter referred to as the Association. ARTICLE 2 - RECOGNITION A. Pursuant to the Association's petition to the City dated March 25, 1982, and applicable State laws, Firefighters' Associa- tion is acknowledged by the City as the majority representative of the employees in the following classifications: Firefighter Firefighter/Paramedic Fire Engineer Fire Captain B. It is understood that Fire Captains are included in the bar- gaining unit. However, because of the nature of the department and the lack of another supervisory employee rank between Fire Captain and Fire Chief/Director of Public Safety, Fire Captains will be permitted to function as management. Part of the duties of the Fire Captain will be to carry out the direction of manage- ment in regard to directing the work force. ARTICLE 3 - MUTUAL RECOMMENDATION This Memorandum of Understanding constitutes a mutual recommenda- tion by the parties to the City Council. It is expressly intend- ed that the duties, responsibilities, and functions of the City in the operation of its Fire Department shall in no manner be impaired, subordinated, or negated by any provisions of this agreement. ARTICLE 4 - CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL It is, however, the mutual understanding of all the parties here- to that such Memorandum of Understanding will become effective` upon approval by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach. ARTICLE 5 - REPEALS The provisions of this Memorandum of Understanding together with those wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment in existence prior to July 1, 1992, which are subject to negotia- tions pursuant to Section 3504 of the Government Code and are not - 1 - changed by this Memorandum, shall constitute the wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment for the employees during the terms of this Memorandum of Understanding. ARTICLE 6 - EFFECTIVE AND TERMINATION DATES This Memorandum of Understanding shall become effective July 1, 1992, and will continue through June 30, 1994, with respect to all fire safety employees of the City of Hermosa Beach. During the period covered by this Memorandum of Understanding, any items concerning wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of em- ployment provided by this Memorandum of Understanding shall re- main in effect unless the parties agree to revise the same as a written modification to this Memorandum of Understanding, subject to the limitations expressed in Section 350.4 of the Government Code. ARTICLE 7 - CONSTITUTIONALITY If any section,. subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Memorandum of Understanding is for any reason held to be illegal or unconstitutional, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portion of this Memorandum of Understanding. ARTICLE 8 - MANAGEMENT'S RIGHTS RESERVED 1. Manage the City. 2. Schedule working hours. 3. Establish, modify or change work schedules or standards. 4. Institute changes in procedures. 5. Direct the work force, including the right to hire, promote, demote., transfer, suspend, discipline or discharge any employee. 6. Determine the location of any new facilities, building, departments, divisions, or subdivisions thereof, .and the relocation, sale, leasing or closing of facilities, departments, divisions, or subdivisions thereof. 7. Determine services to be rendered. 8. Determine the layout of buildings and equipment and materials to be used herein. 9. Determine processes, techniques, methods and means or performing work. 10. Determine the size, character and use of inventories. 11. Determine the financial policy including accounting procedures. 12. Determine the administrative organization of the system. 13. Determine selection, promotion, or transfer of employees. 14. Determine the size and characteristics of the work force. 15. Determine the allocation and assignment of work to. employees. 16. Determine policy affecting the selection of new employees. 17. Determine the establishment of quality and quantity standards and the judgment of quality and quantity of work required. 18. Determine administration of discipline. 19. Determine control and use of City property, materials and equipment. 20. Schedule work periods and determine the number of work periods. 21. Establish, modify, eliminate or enforce rules and regulations. 22. Place work with outside firms. 23. Determine the kinds and numbers of personnel necessary. 24. Determine the methods and means by which such operations are to be conducted. 25. Require employees, where necessary, to take in-service training courses during working hours. 26. Determine duties to be included in any job classifications. 27. Determine the necessity of overtime and the amount of overtime required. 28. Take any necessary action to carry out the mission of. the City in cases of an emergency. B. The exercise of the foregoing powers, rights authority, duties and responsibilities by the City, the adoption of poli- cies, rules, regulations and practices in furtherance thereof, and the use of judgment and the discretion in connection there- with, shall be limited only by the terms of this Memorandum of Understanding, City Personnel Ordinance, Personnel Rules and Reg- ulations, current established practice, and other statutory law. C. Except in emergencies, or where the City is required to make changes in its operations because of, the requirements of law, whenever the exercise of managements' rights shall impact on the employees of the bargaining unit, the City agrees to meet and confer with representatives of the Association, upon request by the Association, regarding the impact of the exercise of such rights unless the matter of the exercise of such rights is pro- vided for. in this Memorandum of Understanding. ARTICLE 9 - FIRE SERVICE CONSOLIDATION. A. In the event that the City should relinquish certain man- agerial functions anagerial.functions due to consolidation or merger, the City will notify the Association in order to meet and reach an agreement with the. Association where such consolidation or merger affects the hours, wages or other terms and conditions of employment of the work force of the Fire Department. B. The City agrees that, should it exercise its management right to consolidate or otherwise contract out all or part of the fire safety function, all accrued [vacation, sick, comp. time, not yet utilized as of the consolidation date shall either be paid in full or transferred to the new provider; for employeesso trans- ferring, they shall have the choice of cash in/retention of said accrued leaves. ARTICLE 10 - EXEMPT EMPLOYEES A. The Classification of Fire Captain is part of the Firefighter bargaining unit but, for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act, is designated as exempt. B. For purposes of FLSA pay and overtime, Fire Captains will be treated the same as non-exempt classifications. C. It is understood that the Captains, as management, may from time to time have to rearrange the manpower on any particular shift. ARTICLE 11 - SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION The scope of representation of the Association shall include all matters relating to employment condition and employer-employee relations including wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment. ARTICLE 12 - NO DISCRIMINATION It is agreed that neither the Firefighters' Association nor the City shall discriminate against any employee because of race, national origin, color, creed, medical condition, martial status, age, sex, handicap, political or religious opinions or affilia- tions or, Association or non -Association membership. ARTICLE 13 - HOURS OF WORK All employees covered by this Memorandum of Understanding shall work shifts of twenty-four (24) hours in such a manner that they average 56 hours per week. ARTICLE 14 - 7K EXEMPTION The City of Hermosa Beach has exercised its ability to.take a statutory "7K" exemption for sworn fire personnel. The work peri- od for such employees shall be twenty eight (28) days in length commencing on April 16, 1986 at 7:00 a.m. (0700). ARTICLE 15 - STEWARD'S ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE The City shall provide an aggregate total of three (3) shifts per year for use by the Association stewards to attend employer- employee related seminars, conferences, etc., such times subject to mutual agreement with the Fire Chief/Public Safety Director and the availability of replacement personnel. ARTICLE 16 - REASONABLE NOTICE It is mutually understood and agreed that a copy (via the United States postal service) of the City Council and/or Personnel Board agenda for each meeting, mailed to the Association, shall con- stitute reasonable written notice, and notice of an opportunity to meet with such agencies, on all matters within the scope of representation upon which the City Council or Personnel Board may act. ARTICLE 17 - ACCESS TO WORK STATION The City agrees to grant official representatives of the Associa- tion the access and right to discuss any grievance or problem arising under the terms of this Agreement with any employee during working hours. It is agreed that there will be as little. interference as possible by the Association Representative during the working hours of said employee. It is agreed that the As- sociation Representative shall be permitted to conduct a rea- sonable amount of Association business regarding grievances during working hours without loss of pay and that the Association may use City facilities to conduct meetings when such facilities are available. ARTICLE 18 - BULLETIN BOARD One bulletin board will be provided upon which the Association may post only notices of recreational, health and welfare, and social affairs, notices of meetings or election. The posting of any other classes of notices or the distribution of any written or printed notices, cards, pamphlets or literature of any kind at City work stations or premises is prohibited without the prior permission of the City Manager or an authorized departmental man- agement official. ARTICLE 19 - PAYROLL DEDUCTION It is mutually agreed that the City will, during the term of this Agreement, deduct monies and remit to the Association (as au- thorized by Employee Payroll Deduction Authorization) a deduction for dues and insurance, providing there is not more than one such deduction per pay period. ARTICLE 20 - NO REDUCTION It is agreed that no member of the Association by virtue of the adoption of this Agreement shall suffer a reduction in working conditions and/or other benefits not otherwise enumerated in. this Memorandum of Understanding. ARTICLE 21 - ACTING POSITIONS & SPECIAL DUTY PAY A. Any employee assigned to perform the duties of a higher job classification shall receive acting pay of an additional 5% above his regular rate; of pay as determined on Base Salary (exclusive of premium, bonus, incentive or other pay). B. In addition to the permanent Fire Engineer position, any em- ployee covered by this agreement, who is assigned the duties and responsibilities of Fire Engineer on an engine and who may be called upon to perform the duties of Fire engineer at the scene of an emergency by laying lines,deploying hand lines, pumping water, or having water flowing through the engine during a shift, shall be eligible for acting pay for that shift. Should an employee so assigned not complete an entire shift (24 hrs.) he shall receive acting pay only for those hours actually. worked. C. Acting Pay shall be paid monthly. D. An employee covered by this agreement and assigned to perform any of the duties listed below shall receive an additional 5% above his Base Salary for each month so assigned. 1. Plan Check Officer 2. Paramedic Coordinator 3. Department Mechanic E. The City and Association mutually agree to meet, as the need may arise, to develop additional Special Duties pay categories. ARTICLE 22 - PARAMEDIC REASSIGNMENT A. After a Paramedic has worked in the paramedic classification for a period of not less than five (5) consecutive years, he may return to the classification of Firefighter. The intended pur- pose is to provide the paramedic with the opportunity of reas- signment. It is understood that in the event of such reassign- ment, the member will be placed at the step in the Firefighter base salary range corresponding to his step at the Paramedic sal- ary range. This reduction will remain in effect until such time that the member either returns to paramedic duty or promotes to a higher rank within the Department. Additionally, the Fire Chief/ Public Safety Director has the authority to retain sufficient personnel, certified as a paramedic, to maintain the required level of service. B. When a vacancy occurs in the Paramedic classification, prior to any new entry level examination process, a promotional ex- amination will be conducted with all current Firefighters, who. meet the minimum requirements, eligible to participate in the examination process. ARTICLE 23 - MEDICAL EXAMS A. All employees covered by this agreement shall be provided with a complete physical exam on a biennial schedule. B. Said physical to be at a location of the City's choice and at the City's expense. C. The physical exam is to include the following procedures as medically indicated: 1. Physician systemic examination 2. Audiometry 3. Occult Blood 4. Comprehensive Blood Panel and Urinalysis 5. Exercise prescription/Physician Consultation Additional procedures such as tonometry, spirometry, chest x-ray, body composition analysis, resting 12 -lead electrocardiogram, maximal exercise stress test, oxygen uptake analysis, and strength and flexibility testing may be performed as medically appropriate. ARTICLE 24 - EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH A. The City will provide to all employees: covered by this agree- ment the equivalent of the Employee Assistance Program (EAP) that is in effect as of July 1, 1986. ... B. City willcontinue to provide the Psychological Health Plan that is in effect as of July 1, 1986 or its equivalent. ARTICLE 25 - NON -TOBACCO PROVISION The City and the Association agree that smoking is a major health hazard and therefore further agree: A. All current employees covered by this agreement will strive to be non-users of tobacco products; B. The useof tobacco products on duty is prohibited nor shall it be permitted at the Fire Station; D. Employees hired July 1, 1986 or later, shall be non -tobacco users and all job bulletins announcing employment opportunities in the Fire service shall specify that only non -tobacco users need apply; such employees shall remain non -tobacco users while in the employee of the City. Violation of this provision by a permanent employee shall result in an EAP referral and necessi- tate compliance with the EAP developed service plan. Failure to do abide by the aforementioned will result in dismissal; H. All employees hired after July 1, 1986 shall, at the time of their initial hire (and yearly thereafter) verify that they are non -tobacco users; I. The purpose of the above agreement is to reduce the risk of cancer which may be considered a job related illness among em- ployees covered by this agreement. ARTICLE 26 - EMPLOYEE OPTION BENEFIT PROGRAM Section 1. Purpose To provide a benefit package which allows the individual fire- fighter to select benefits according to his/her particular needs. Section 2. Amount of Benefit Effective April 1, 1983 the amount of benefit is $569.38 monthly. At such time as the three party (family) premium exceeds $724.00 per month, the EOB benefit shall be increased by 55% of the in- crease in the cost of the Indemnity Medical Plan for coverage of the Employee plus dependents. Any increase in the EOB Benefit is to be effective coincidental to the effective date of the Indem- nity Medical Plan cost increase. Section 3. Benefit Options a. Medical Insurance 1. An employee entitled to his EOB must either purchase Medi- cal insurance through the City or provide the City with proof of coverage for medical insurance by other means. 2. Either the Indemnity or the HMO Medical insurance plan may be utilized. Effective April 1, 1993, employees covered by this agreement shall be responsible for the current co -pay amounts in effect for the HMO and Indemnity coverages. b. Dental Insurance.. 1. Either the Indemnity of the HMO Dental plan may be utilized. c. Vision Insurance. d. Deferred Compensation. e. Cash Payment 1. Monthly with regular paychecks A. cal for ARTICLE 27 - EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE In recognition of formal educational, vocational and techni- training the City agrees to the following incentive program all Fire Department employees covered by this MOU: 1. $100.00 per month. Certificate, and, 2. $100.0.0 per month Courses, plus an for State Fire Officers (SFO) notwithstanding the above; for 30 Units College Fire Science additional - 3. $100.00 per month for 60 Units College Fire Science Courses OR Associates in Arts Degree (AA); Also: 4. $175.00 per month for a Captain or Engineer Certified as a Paramedic. 5. $300.00 per month for BA/BS Degree from an accredited educational institution (excludes 30 & 60 FS unit and AA degree), and, 6. $100.00 per month for Emergency Medical Technician Certificate (EMT -1)* (* EMT -1 Premium available for classifications other than Paramedic.) B. SFO and EMT -1 Certificate may be combined with academic premium. C. Effective 7/1/87 Captain not eligible for SFO premium D. Retroactivity for payment of any of the above premiums shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) months. ARTICLE 28 - TRUCK COMPANY STAFFING A. At such time as City finds that a "Truck Company" is neces- sary, Engineer manning shall be increased to two (2) per shift. B. In the event of "B", City and Association shall meet to dis- cuss appropriate "Truck Company" staffing requirements. ARTICLE 29. - OVERTIME A. All employees covered by this agreement who are required to perform in excess of the standard work period of 212 hours in a 28 day cycle shall receive compensation at the rate of time and one-half his/her regular rate of'pay. .The regular rate of pay shall include the following components in addition to Base salary: 1. Educational Incentive 2. Special Assignment Pay (ie: Plan Check) 3. Acting Pay B. All employees covered by this agreement who are required to perform less that 212 hours in a standard work period of 28 days, shall receive compensation at the straight time regular rate of pay or compensatory time on an hour for hour basis. C. No employee covered by this agreement shall accrue more than one hundred forty four (144) hours of such compensatory time. Should any employee exceed one hundred forty four (144).hours of accrued compensatory time, he/she shall receive compensation at the straight time regular rate of pay D. In determining an employee's eligibility for overtime compen- sation in a work period, paid leaves of absences and unpaid leaves of absences shall be excluded from the total hours worked. Paid leaves of absences include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Vacation 2. Holiday Leave 3. Sick. Leave 4. Administrative Leave 5. Compensatory Leave 6. Workers' Compensation Leave 7. 4850 Time 8. Jury Duty (compensated by the City) 9. Bereavement Leave 10. Military Leave E. All extra time worked (commonly referred to as overtime) will be distributed as equally as possible among regular full time Association members within the classifications. F. All employees covered by this agreement forced to work in a lower classification shall receive their regular rate of pay. G. No employee shall be required to, work overtime until all available employees have been contacted. H. All hours spent acquiring continuing education for the pur- pose of maintaining certification as a paramedic shall be con- sidered hours worked for FLSA purposes. ARTICLE 30 - OVERTIME AUTHORIZATION A. All overtime requests must have prior written authorization of a supervisor prior to the commencement of such overtime work. Where prior written authorization is not feasible, explicit ver- bal authorization must be obtained. Where verbal authorization is obtained, written authorization must be obtained as soon as thereafter practicable. Dispatched calls beyond the end of duty time are considered as authorized. B. An employee's failure to obtain prior written approval, or explicit verbal authorization followed by written authorization, will result in the denial of the overtime request. ARTICLE 31 - SHIFT TRADES A. The practice of shift trading shall be voluntary on behalf of each employee involved in the trade. B. A member desiring a shift trade (exchange). shall: 1. Prepare and submit with proper signatures a "shift exchange form" to his supervisor. 2. Exchange shifts with members of equal rank or classifica- tion, or members that can be assigned to perform in an acting capacity (non -compensated), or can perform the same duties as the requestor. 3. Make sure the exchange is approved by the proper supervi- sor(s) before the trade occurs. C. The trade must be due to the employee's desire or need to attend to a personal matter and not due to the department's operations. Shift trades are not to be used in lieu of accrued vacation and/or comp. time. More than three consecutive shift trades requested will be approved only when accompanied by a val- id justification (i.e. educational commitments, use of required yearly vacation already taken, manning shortages, or cancellation of other time off by the Department). D. The employee providing the trade shall not have his/her com- pensable hours increased as a result of the trade; nor shall the employee receiving the trade have his compensable hours decreased as a result of the trade. Any hours worked beyond the normal work day will be credited to the individual actually doing the work. E. Once approved, shift trade dates and/or repayment dates may not be changed unless circumstances justify the change and must be submitted in writing to the requestor's Captain for approval. F. "Paybacks" of shift trades are the obligation of the two em- ployees involved in the trade. Paybacks are to be completed within one (1) year of the date of the initial shift trade. Any dispute as to paybacks is to be resolved by the involved em- ployees, and under no circumstances will the department be obli- gated for any further compensation whatsoever to any of the in- volved employees. The department is not responsible in any manner for hours owed to employees by other employees that leave the employment of the City or are assigned other duties. G. A record of all initial shift trades and "paybacks" shall be maintained by the Fire Captains. H. If one individual fails to appear for the other (regardless of the reason), the person who traded in to the schedule will be listed as absent without leave and may be subject to disciplinary action. ARTICLE 32 - EARLY RELIEF POLICY The practice. of early shift relief shall be voluntary �n behalf of each employee involved in the relief. --The employee providing the early relief shall not have his/her compensable hours in- creased as a result of the early relief; nor shall the employee relieved early have his/her compensable hours decreased as a result of the early relief. "Paybacks" of early relief hours are the sole obligation ofthe two employees involved in the early relief. Any dispute is to be resolved by the involved employees, and under no circumstances will the department be obligated for any further compensation whatsoever to any of the involved em- ployees. The department is not responsible in any manner for hours owed to employees by other employees that leave the employ- ment of the City or are assigned to other duties. ARTICLE 33 - TRAINING TIME A. Attendance at training schools/facilities (including the Academy) which improves the performance of regular tasks and/or prepares for job advancement are not compensable for hours in excess of the employee's normal work shift. Any time spent in excess of the normal work shift will not be counted as working time and is not compensable in any manner, whatsoever. Time spent in studying and other personal pursuits is not compensable hours of work, even though the employeemay be confined to campus or to barracks 24 hours a day. This provision is not intended to waive any employee's rights for purposes of Workers' Compensation benefits. B. Training mandated by the Department on an employee's day off shall be compensated for actual time spent in training. C. Travel time to and from the training facility outside of an employee's normal work shift is not normally compensable hours of work, however, reasonable requests for. travel time shall be ad- justed between the Department Head and the Employee. Nothing in this article is intended to waive the employee's rights for pur- poses of Workers' compensation benefits. ARTICLE 34 - CITY VEHICLE USE Employees who are provided with.a City vehicle to travel to and from work shall not be compensated in any manner whatsoever for such travel time in the City vehicle. [this provision also ap- plies in those situations where the radio must be left on and monitored]. ARTICLE 35 - COURT PAY When an employee covered by this agreement is physically called to court, he/she shall be credited on an hour for hour basis for the time actually spent in court. Travel time shall not be con- sidered hours worked and shall not be compensated in any manner whatsoever. This provision is not intended to waive the em- ployee's rights for purposes of Workers' Compensation benefits. ARTICLE 36 - COURT STANDBY PAY A. An employee may leave a telephone number where he/she may be reached while on court standby. Such time is not considered hours worked and will not be compensated in any manner whatsoever. B. Alternatively, an employee on court standby shall report, with the permission of the Department, to the Fire facility, in uni- form, for assignment while awaiting court. An employee shall be credited on an hour for hour basis for time actually worked while on standby. Travel time to the.Fire facility shall not be con- sidered hours worked and shall not be compensated in any manner whatsoever. ARTICLE 37 - CALL BACK A. Call back duty occurs when an employee is ordered to return to duty on a non -regularly scheduled work shift. Call back does not occur when an employee is held over from his/her regularly scheduled shift. An employee called back to duty shall be credited with a minimum of four (4) hours work commencing when he/she reports to duty. Any hours worked in excess of four (4) hours shall be credited on an hour for hour basis for actual time worked. Travel time shall not be considered hours worked and shall not be compensated in any manner whatsoever. B. An employee who is held over at the end of his/her shift for an emergency. shall be credited with a minimum of two (2) hours work. ARTICLE 38 - PAID VACATIONS A. Employees covered bythis agreement shall receive paid annual vacations pursuant to the terms of this Article. B. Vacation requests will be made by employees as far in' advance as possible in order to insure time off as required. All vaca- tion time schedules will be posted on the board by the Department at least three (3) weeks in advance. C. All Association members within the classification shall have the first week after the list is posted on the board to fill the openings. All other personnel may sign for any open shifts after the first week. If any shift remains open after the second week, the Captain may require department personnel to fill them. The parties agree that a list be kept of overtime for vacation, holi- day, sick leave, and emergency. D. Paid vacations to be as follows: Upon Hire 5 shifts/year Commencing with the Third Year 6 shifts/year Commencing with the Sixth year 7 shifts/year' Commencing with the Tenth year 9 shifts/year Commencing with the Fifteenth Year 11 shifts/year Commencing with the Nineteenth year 12 shifts/year E. Provided however, no current employee shall have an accrual rate less than said rate in effect as of June 30, 1989. F. All employees shall take vacation time off within. each fiscal year. G. An employee may accrue vacation to a maximum of 15 shifts (360 hrs). Cash out of any earned but unused vacation accrual in excess of 360 hrs. shall be automatically cashed out as part of the June 30th payroll. Cash -out of excess vacation accrual shall be at the employees' regular rate of pay. H. Additionally, upon utilization of vacation, an employee covered by this agreement may cash in vacation on a one for one basis up to a maximum of six (6) shifts per year. Cash -in of Vacation accrual shall be at the employees' regular rate of pay. I. In the event that an employee desires to accumulate vacation time from year to year, the employee may do so providing permis- sion has been received from the City Manager; City Manager shall not unreasonably withhold such permission. J. Requests for vacation time of more than three (3) shifts must be submitted to the Captain at least three (3) shifts in advance. ARTICLE 40 - HOLIDAYS A. All employees who are covered by this agreement shall accrue Holiday Comp time at a rate of ten (10) hours per month (five shifts per year); B. Requests for Holiday Comp time off of more than three (3) shifts shall be submitted to the Captain at least three (3) shifts in advance. Only one (1) Captain and one (1) Engineer may be off at the same time. C. There shall be accrual cap of 480 hours; all hours in ex- cess of this maximum shall be automatically cashed out as part of the June 30th payroll. Said cash out to be at the employee's regular rate of pay. ARTICLE 41 - SICK LEAVE A. All Association Members shall accrue twelve (12) hours per month sick leave (6 shifts per year). B. Effective July 1, 1986, all employees with a minimum sick leave balance of 242 hours MAY annually cash in up to two hundred (200) hours of sick leave per year in excess of 242 hours. The annual date and number of hours shall be the employee's choice. Said cash out will be at the employee's regular rate of pay. C. Employees hired prior to July 1, 1989 shall have an accrual cap of 2000 hours. All hours in excess of this maximum shall be automatically cashed out as part of the June 30th payroll at em- ployees' regular rate of pay. Employees whose accrual balance exceeds 2000 hours as of July 1, 1989 shall be allowed to main- tain that balance. D. Employees hired July 1, 1989 or later shall have an accrual cap of 1200 hrs. All hours in excess of this maximum shall be automatically cashed out as part of the June 30th payroll at em- ployees regular rate of pay. ARTICLE 42 - REGULATION OF SICK LEAVE & OTHER PROVISIONS A. Use of Sick Leave 1. Sick leave shall be used only in case of sickness or dis- ability of the employee or for family sick leave. Misuse of sick leave shall be grounds for disciplinary action. B. Procedure 1. To receive compensation while absent on sick leave, em- ployees shall notify the City per.. the Department's sick leave policy. 2. When absence is for more than two (2) consecutive shifts the City may request the reason for the absence be verified by a written statement, stating the cause of absence, from an attend- ing physician. The employee shall furnish any other proof of sickness reasonably required by the City. C. Family Sick Leave 1. In case of serious illness or death of a member of the immediate family, the employee may utilize sick leave. 2. Pregnancy (maternity or paternity) is an allowable use. 3. Immediate family for the purpose of this Section shall be defined as : spouse, mother, mother-in-law, father, father-in- law, sister, brother, (step)child or guardian, stepfather, step- mother, grandparents or grandchildren. 4. Such time shall be deducted from the existing sick leave of the employee. ARTICLE 43 - SICK LEAVE AT TERMINATION OR NON -SERVICE RETIREMENT A. For employees hired prior to July 1, 1989 and upon termina- tion, either voluntary or involuntary, from City employment, or Medical/Psychological retirement, sick leave will be paid, at the employees' regular rate of pay, according to the following standards: 1. 25% of all accrued sick leave for 5 thru 9 years con- tinuous service. 2. 50% of all accrued sick leave for 10 thru 19 years con- tinuous service. 3. 75% of all accrued sick leave for 20 plus years continuous service (exception: for medical retirement at age 50+ with 20 years or more of continuous service, cash -out shall be at em- ployees' forty -hour rate). B. For employees hired July 1, 1989 or later and upon termina- tion, either voluntary or involuntary, from City employment, or Medical/Psychological retirement, sick leave shall be paid, at the employees' regular rate of pay, according to the following standards: 1. 50% of all accrued sick leave for 10 or more years of continuous service. ARTICLE 44 - RETIREMENT A. Employees covered by this Agreement shall be provided with the California Public Retirement System, 2% at 50 Plan with sec- tion 20024.2 - One year final compensation (twelve highest paid consecutive months) included. City shall pay the employee 9% contribution. B. City and Association agree that, during the term of this MOU, the City shall amend the P.E.R.S. contract to include Section 20930.3 .- Military Service Credit as Public Service.. Said amend- ment shall become effective as soon as practicable following ex- ecution of this MOU. ARTICLE 45 - SERVICE RETIREMENT A. Employees hired prior to July 1, 1989 may elect to receive the cash value of their monthly accrual for Vacation, Sick, and Holiday Comp included as part of their base monthly salary in lieu of receiving any further accrual during their final twelve months of service. No conversion of benefits that were accrued prior to the conversion period shall be allowed. B. In addition to "A" above, employees hired prior to July 1, 1989 may elect to receive the employee's 9% P.E.R.S. contribution credited to base salary. Upon such election, the employee shall. commence payment of the P.E.R.S. contribution for their salary. C. In order to be eligible for conversion of accruals, the em- ployee must announce their service retirement a minimum of twelve (12) months in advance. D. The value of the converted leave (sick, vacation, holiday comp) shall be computed at the employees' forty (40) hour rate of pay. E. At no time shall this additional compensation so received act in any way to increase any other premium pays (e.g. acting pay) which are computed as a percentage of base pay, nor shall the cash value of said sick leave be included in the computation of the value of any accrual cash -outs. F. Upon service retirement, 75% of any remaining accrued sick hours shall be cashed out computed at the. employees forty -hour (40 hour) equivalent rate of pay (exclusive of any conversion amount). G. For employees hired prior to July 1, 1989, upon service re- tirement, the employees accumulatedholidaycomp. and vacation accrual accounts shall be cashed out at the employees forty -hour (40 hr.) equivalent rate.: of pay (exclusive of any conversion amount). H. Employees hired July 1, 1989 or later may convert their monthly vacation, sick, and holiday comp accrual during their final twelve months service on a prospective basis only. Conver- sion amounts shall be at the employee's regular rate of pay (56 hour rate). Excess accruals shall be cashed out at the em- ployee's regular rate of pay (56 hour rate). ARTICLE 46 - UNIFORM ALLOWANCE A. All permanent personnel covered by this Agreement shall be authorized a yearly maintenance and replacement uniform allowance of three hundred ($300) dollars per year. . ARTICLE 47 - LIFE INSURANCE A. All employees covered by the Agreement to be provided- Life Insurance in the amount of $27,500 at City expense. ARTICLE 48 - SALARY CONTINUANCE A. Management agrees to contribute for each member of the Unit the sum of $33.90 per month per person toward the purchase of a Long Term Disability Plan. Any cost in excess of this shall be borne by the Associaton. B. Effective upon, and ocincidential to, the date the FFA as- sumes all responsibility for the provision/administration or, and premium payment for, the LTD plan, the City's premium contribu- tion of $33.90/employee/month shall cease and the amount of bene- fit for the Employee Option Benefit Program (Article 26) shall be increased by $33.90. C. All Association members shall be required to be covered under the LDT plan. B. The use of accrued sick and/or other time shall not be neces- sary beyond the 30 day waiting period prior to utilization of the LTD plan. C. An employee utilizing the LTD plan shall not accrue vacation, sick leave, holiday comp or allowances after the 30th day after disability leave. ARTICLE 49 - SELECTION OF IOD DOCTOR OR FACILITY It is understood that the City will provide medical facilities to be used for industrial accidents or illness. However, in the event that the Association members covered by the M.O.U. wish to grieve the City's selection, the _City will give due consideration to the facts presented and select a new facility based on all facts presented if necessary. This provision in no manner is in- tended to waive or abrogate employees Workers' Compensation rights under the under the California Labor Code. ARTICLE 50 - CONSTANT MANNING A. The term "constant manning" refers to procedures established to ensure that fire suppression staffing levels are maintained at a predetermined number of personnel. A predetermined number of personnel is established by the number of currently authorized Fire Department positions and by the organizational assignment of personnel. The Association and the City agree that for and during the term of this agreement the established staffing level shall be a minimum of five (5) persons per shift and an agreed upon goal of six (6) per shift. B. City and Association agree to meet and confer should the financial position of the City improve to the extent that would allow a return to a minimum staffing of six (6) per shift. ARTICLE 51 - PROBATIONARY PERIOD Original appointments to the Fire Department shall serve a -proba- tionary period of eighteen (18) months. Promotional appointments shall serve a probationary period of twelve (12) months. Firefighter/Paramedic promotional candidates shall be probation- ary while attending paramedic school and for a twelve month peri- od following certification. Probationary periods may be extended for a period not to exceed six (6) months. ARTICLE 52 WORK STOPPAGE PROHIBITION A. Prohibited Conduct: 1. The Association, its officers, agents, representatives, and members, agree that, during the term if this Memorandum of Under- standing or any agreed upon extensions of the M.O.U., they will not call or engage in any strike, walkout, work stoppage, sick- out, blue flu, concerted withholding of services by employees represented by the Association, disruption of City services, or honor any job action by any other employee or group action by any other employee or group of employees of the City or any union or association of employees by withholding or refusing to perform services; provided, however, that by executing this agreement, neither the Association nor any of its members waive their rights (1) under Section 6300 et. seq. of the California Labor Code to refuse to work under unsafe conditions and (2) under the United States and California Constitutions to exercise their rights of freedom of speech, assembly, and association such as by engaging in unlawful informational picketing. 2. In the event that the Association, its officers, agents, representatives, or members engage in any of the conduct pro- hibited above, the Association shall immediately instruct, in writing, any persons engaging in such conduct that their actions are in violation of this Memorandum of Understanding and are un- lawful, and that they must immediately cease such conduct and return to work. 3. In the event that the Association carries out in good faith its responsibilities set forth in Paragraph 2 above, it shall not be liable for the actions of any individual who participates in conduct prohibited by Paragraph 1 above. Any employee who par- ticipates in any conduct prohibited above and violates any other City Rule or Regulation, shall be subject to disciplinary action including termination by the City. This shall not abrogate the right of any employee to receive all due process guaranteed to him or her in procedures relating to disciplinary action. ARTICLE 53 - ADDITIONAL DUTIES The Association Members hereby agree to: A. Perform minor interior, exterior, and grounds maintenance and repair in and about the Fire Station. B. Perform coordination and enforcement of Ordinances relating to Fire Life Safety issues such as: 1. Weed Abatement; 2. Abandoned Vehicles; 3. Hazardous Materials. C. Perform emergency preparedness coordination duties including monthly maintenance and testing of emergency power system. ARTICLE 54 - AUXILIARY FIREFIGHTERS No member of the auxiliary/reserve/paid call firefighters or other such -volunteer program firefighters will be used to replace regular employees in the Fire Department in overtime situations. However, in the event there are no regular, full-time fire- fighters available, the City, upon notification to the Associa- tion, and approved by same, may use auxiliary/reserve/paid call personnel in overtime situations in order to maintain the proper minimum manning level. ARTICLE 55 - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES A. Purpose of Grievance Procedures: 1. To promote improved employer-employee relations by es- tablishing procedures on matters._. 2. To provide that grievances shall be settled as near as pos- sible to the point of origin. 3. To provide that the grievance procedures shall be as infor- mal as possible. B. A "Grievance" shall be defined as a controversy between the City and the Association or an employee or employees covered by this Agreement. Such controversy must pertain to any of the following: 1. Any matter involving the application of any provision of this Agreement; or.. 2. Any matter involving the violations of any provision of in- tent of this Agreement; or 3. Any matter that affects the working conditions of the em- ployee or the application of all rules, regulations, policies and/or laws affecting the employees covered by this Agreement. C. Disciplinary actions shall not be appealed under the provi- sions of this section. D. There shall be earnest effort on the part of both parties to settle grievances promptly through the steps listed below. STEP 1. An employee's Grievance must be submitted in writing by the employee, fully stating the facts surrounding the Grievance and detailing the specific provisions of this Agreement alleged to have been violated, signed, and dated by the employee and presented to his first line supervisor immediately in charge of the aggrieved employee within fifteen (15) calendar days after the event giving rise to the Grievance or fifteen (15) calendar days after he could have been reasonably expected to have had knowledge. The supervisor will give his -answer to the employee by the end of the tenth (10) calendar day following the presenta- tion of the grievance and the. giving of such answer will termi- nate Step 1. STEP 2. If the grievance is not settled in Step 1, the grievance will be presented to the Fire Chief/Director of Public Safety (or in the case where the Fire Chief/Director of Public Safety re- sponded at step 1, to the City Manager, or his designee) within ten (10) calendar days after termination of Step 1. A meeting with the employee, Association Officer, and Fire Chief/Director of Public Safety (or City Manager or his designee), will be ar- ranged at a mutually agreeable location and time to review and discuss the grievance. Such meeting will take place within fif- teen (15) calendar days from the date the grievance is received by the Fire Chief/Director of Public Safety (or City Manager/ designee). The Chief/Director (City Manager/designee) may invite other members of_management to be present at such meeting. The Director (City Manager/designee) will give a written reply by the end of the tenth (10) calendar day following the date of the meeting, and the giving of such reply will terminate Step 2. STEP 3. If the grievance is not settled in Step 2, the Associa- tion Representative shall, within seven (7) calendar days after the termination of Step 2, arrange for a meeting with the City Manager to be held at a mutually agreeable location and time to review and discuss the grievance. Such meeting will take place within ten (10) calendar days from the date of the grievance is referred to Step 3. A decision shall be rendered within ten (10) calendar days from the date of such meeting. The decision shall be in writing.. E. Time limits as set forth above may be extended by mutual agreement between the parties but neither party shall be required to do so. F. In the event that the Association calls witnesses that must be excused from work, the City agrees to excuse same in paid status. G. The parties agree that in the event the member or the As- sociation fail to comply with the time limits contained herein, such failure constitutes a waiver of right to prosecute the grievance;. it is further agreed that in the event the City or its representatives fail to comply with the prescribed time limits, such failure constitutes an agreement to concur with the griev- ant's position and remedy. It is not intended that the grievance procedure be used to effect changes in the established salary and fringe benefits. ARTICLE 56 - ARBITRATION A. Grievances which are not settledpursuant to the grievance procedure herein and which either party desires to contest fur- ther, shall be submitted to arbitration as provided in this Arti- cle provided however, that said request for Arbitrationshall be made within twenty (20) days of the conclusion of Step 3 of the Grievance procedure. B. As soon as possible and in any event, not later then fourteen (14) calendar days after either party received written notice from the other of the desire to arbitrate, the parties shall agree upon an arbitrator. If no agreement is reached within said fourteen (14) calendar days, an arbitrator shall be selected from a list of seven (7) arbitrators submitted by the Federal Media- tion and Conciliation Service by alternate striking of names un- til one name remains. The party who strikes the first name from the panel shall be determined by lot. C. Either the City or the Association may call any employee as a witness, and the employer agrees to release said witness from work if he is on duty. If an employee witness is called by the City, the City will reimburse him for time lost; if called by the Association, the Association may pay the expense. D. The arbitrator shall have no power to alter, amend, change, add to, or subtract from any of the terms of this Agreement. The decision of the arbitrator shall be based solely upon evidence and arguments presented to him by the respective parties in the presence of each other. E. The decision of the arbitrator within the limits herein pre- scribed shall be final and binding upon the parties in dispute. F. The mutual decision of the parties and/or the arbitrator in any dispute shall be the final and binding decision on all parties and there shall not be any appeal to another board, au- thority, commission and/or agency for it is the intent of this Agreement to supplant the Civil Service (Personnel Board) hearing and appeal system with the provisions of this Agreement. G. The Arbitrator may hear and determine only one grievance at a time without the expressed agreement of the City and the Associa- tion. The parties shall share equally the expense of the cost of the arbitration, with the exception of counsel's fees. ARTICLE 57 - PRODUCTIVITY The City and the Association mutually agree to continually seek means of increasing productivity in the Fire Service. ARTICLE 58 - COMPENSATION A. Methods of Compensation: 1. Compensation shall be determined on an hourly basis. 2. Payments due shall be paid on a bi-monthly basis unless otherwise mutually agreed. By mutual consent early payments and other modifications can be made. 3. Base hourly salary shall be considered at the regular rate of pay for a particular classification without consideration of any other form of compensation. 4. No employees may take time off from normal working hours for the purpose of depositing a pay check. 5. Employees are encouraged to utilize the City's ability to "Direct Deposit" paychecks to the banks of the employees choice. B. Salary Advancements Within Base Pay Range 1. Salary ranges are established to provide fair compensation to each classification. Initial appointment shall be made at the minimum step within a particular range, but. the City Manager may approve a higher starting step. C. Step Advancement: 1. All salary advancement shall be based on merit and fitness. All increases shall be recommended by the Department Head and approved by the Personnel Officer. 2. Merit increases shall be effective at the beginning of the next pay period following the effective date (1st or 16th of the month) . D. Promotion: 1. An employee who is promoted to a.position in a class with a higher salary rate shall be entitled to the lowest step in the higher range which exceeds the present rate of pay with the in- tent of increasing the base salary by at least 5.0%. ARTICLE 59 - BASE MONTHLY SALARY 1. Effective July 1, 1992 the. Base Monthly Salary for the Classifications indicated shall be: A B C D E F CAPTAIN 3903 4098 4303 4518 4744 4981 ENGINEER 3264 3427 3599 3779 3968 4166. PARAMEDIC 3107 3262 3425 3596 3776 3965 FIREFIGHTER 2727 2864 3007 3157 3315 3481 2. Initial Appointment a. For Firefighter the initial appointment shall be at Step A. Upon completion of the Fire Academy, advance to Step B. Upon successful completion of probation, advance to Step C. All addi- tional stepincreases shall. be at yearly intervals based upon merit. b. For Paramedic the initial appointment shall be at Step A. Upon completion of the Fire Academy, Step B. Upon successful completion of probation, advance to Step C. Additional step in- creases at_yearly intervals based upon merit except, for initial hire employees, final step based on merit and minimum three years in Paramedic Classification. Promotional Paramedic appointments shall be eligible for "F" step following twelve (12) months at the "E" step OR upon completion of probation whichever is greater. c. For Engineer the initial appointment to be made at Step A. Additional step increases to be considered upon completion of one year in step EXCEPT advancement to Step F based upon merit and completion of three years service as engineer. ARTICLE 60 - PERFORMANCE REVIEW Upon completion of probation, each employee shall thereafter be reviewed annually; said review to be constructive in nature and designed to point out areas of both strength and weakness, meth- ods of improvement, etc. ARTICLE 61 - PHYSICAL FITNESS PROGRAM - A. Effective July 1, 1989, the City and Association adopt a Physical Fitness Policy and Incentive Program as described in the attached Exhibit A. B. Fitness evaluations shall be conducted bi-annually during the months of October and May. Monetary payments shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Section 704.09 of the Incentive Program. C. Association members who wish to participate in the Physical Fitness Incentive Program shall be allowed two (2) hours during their shift (including prep and clean-up) to participate in physical fitness activities. ARTICLE 62 - LAYOFF The City and the Association acknowledge Section 2-42, of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, as currently enacted, as the governing provision regarding layoff. However, the City and the Association further agree that, prior to implementation of any such layoff, discussions shall be held to explore other alterna- tives, mitigations, etc. ARTICLE 63 - FURTHER STUDIES The City and Association, jointly recognize that some matters need further study and negotiation during the life of the MOU. It is therefore agreed that the following items will be addressed: 1. Role of the Fire Captain. 2. Fire command duties/policies of the position of Director of Public Safety. 3. Assignment of two (2) Engineers per shift. 4. FLSA "hours worked" exemption. 5. Development of an annuity plan for payment of retiree medical premiums. 6. Funding sources for fire services. 7. Physical fitness program criteria upgrade. ARTICLE 64 - EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS SESSIONS A. In the interest of fostering and continuing a spirit and at- mosphere of harmonious employer-employee relationships, it is agreed that the Association Board of Directors shall meet quar- terly with the Fire Chief/Director of Public Safety and bi- annually with the City Manager; there shall be no less than two (2) Board members present for each such meeting. ARTICLE 65 - JURY DUTY The City will not provide jury duty leave pay to employees covered by this Agreement, effective July 1, 1986. If the State of Federal Court jury commissioners change, amend, alter or otherwise rescind their present policy of granting exceptions from jury service to persons who do not receive jury duty pay from their employer (so as to require jury duty service despite the absence of jury duty pay from such employer) then the City's former practice of paying full salary, if jury duty pay is remit- ted to City, shall be reinstated. Employees are not prohibited from using paid vacation or compensatory time in order to volun- tarily participate in jury duty. ARTICLE 66 - MILITARY LEAVE Pursuant to governing State and Federal law, employees covered by this Agreement will be granted Military Leave; said leave to be without City pay. . ARTICLE 67 - DISCIPLINE, SUSPENSION, DISCHARGE. City and Association understand the value of progressive disci- pline. City will therefore endeavor to incorporate that procedure in it's disciplinary policy. In that regard, City will endeavor to adhere to the following guideline re implementing progressive disciplinary procedures: 1. Verbal warning(s) which are to be formally logged; 2. Written reprimand(s); 3. Suspension(s); 4. Demotion/Reduction in pay; . 5. Termination. ARTICLE 69 - APPEAL OF DISCIPLINE A. Verbal warnings may not be appealed. In the case �f a writ- ten reprimand, the employee reprimanded may request the issuer's immediate superior to review the action. Said request shall be made within ten (10) calendar days of the date of the action. B. Suspension, Demotion, Reduction -in -Pay, and Termination: Step I Following notice of intent of disciplinary action, a meeting between the Fire Chief/Director of Public Safety, other manage- ment representatives, the affected employee and representatives of his choice, may be held within ten (10) calendar days to dis- cuss the discipline. Following that meeting, the Fire:. Chief/ Director of Public Safety will -issue a ruling within seven (7) calendar days and may uphold, modify, reduce or recind the pro- posed disciplinary action. Any proposed disciplinary action shall be initiated following the conclusion of Step I. The is- suance of the Chief's/Director's ruling shall conclude Step I. Step II. If the matter is not resolved at Step I, the employee may within seven (7) calendar days file a written appeal with the City Man- ager. The City Manager (or his designee) shall arrange a meeting with the employee and his representative to be held within ten (10) calendar days from the date the appeal is received. The City Manager may invite other members of the management team to be present at that meeting. Following the meeting the City Manager (or his designee) shall render a decision within ten (10) calendar days. The issuance of the decision concludes Step II. Step III. If the matter is not resolved at Step II, the employee may, within ten (10) calendar days of the conclusion of Step II, request a hearing pursuant to Section 2-39/2-40 of the Hermosa beach Municipal Code. Such request shall be delivered in writing to the Personnel Officer. C. Time limits as set forth above for each of the steps may be extended by mutual agreement between the parties,. but neither party shall be required to so agree. ARTICLE 70 - EXIGENCY Notwithstanding the terms described in this MOU, the parties acknowledge the obligation of the City Council to insure the financial integrity of City Government. Accordingly, Association agrees to meet and confer upon request of the City to discuss MOU modifications should: 1. New State or Local Initiatives(s), 2. New Federal mandate(s), or 3. State or Federal Judicial ruling(s) be implemented whereby said action increases City's MOU costs or otherwise precludes operation of any portion of this MOU. It is acknowledged that no such MOU change can occur without ac- ceptance by City and Association. ARTICLE 71 - WAIVER OF BARGAINING The Parties acknowledge that during the negotiation which result- ed in this agreement, each had. the unlimited right and:.opportuni- ty to make demands and proposals with respect to any subject or matter appropriate for collective bargaining and that the under- standings and agreements arrived at by the Parties after the ex- ercise of that right and opportunity are set forth in this Agree- ment. Therefore, the Parties of this Agreement concur that the other shall not be obligated to bargain collectively with respect to any subject or matter without mutual consent even though such subjects or matters may not have been within the knowledge or contemplation of either or both of the Parties at the time that they negotiated or signed this Agreement. ARTICLE 72 - PROVISION EFFECTIVE The provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding shall be effec- tive commencing July 1, 1992, and shall govern until June 30, 1994. ARTICLE 73 - EXECUTION This Memorandum of Understanding represents the full and complete understanding between the parties related to the subject matter set forth herein and all preliminary negotiations ofwhatever kind or nature are merged herein. The parties hereto have caused this Memorandum of Understanding to be executed this day of , 1993. Hermosa Beach Fire City of Hermosa Beach:.., Association: By: By: By: By: By: By: - 27 - April 13, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council IMPLEMENTATION OF R/UDAT RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1) Receive and file this report. 2) .Continue to direct city staff to work with the Chamber's Downtown Improvement Board toprovide assistance and information as needed. 3) Recognize implementation priorities: a) formation of the Downtown Improvement Board b) renovation of the pier and pier head re -design OVERVIEW Based on the on-going and significant .efforts of many members of our community, it is evident that the implementation process is moving forward..: Although the work being accomplished by the Downtown Improvement Board (D.I.B.) has not yet resulted in new structures or visible improvements, the achievements of community consensus -building and development of a spirit of cooperation have been extremely important in building a strong foundation for the future of downtown Hermosa Beach. R/UDAT IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITIES Priority One - Accomplished FORMATION OF A DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT BOARD. Details in "Background" section on Page -6-. Priority Two - In Progress RENOVATION OF THE: PIER AND PIER HEAD RE -DESIGN. A $30,000 pier design competition is underway, developed by the Pier Renovation Committee (a sub -committee of the Public Improvements Division of the D.I.B.), administrated by the Chamber of Commerce, with assistance by the Cabrillo Chapter of the A.I.A. Funding for the competition is being underwritten by the Chamber of Commerce, with anticipated entry fees expected to help defray some expenses. -1- Deadline February 25 March 4 _April 1 April 29 April 29 May 6 June 3 July 1 July 8. July 22 September 1 September 2 PIER RENOVATION TIME LINE Task Description Addendum "A" Addendum "B" professional Research & Obtain Competition Parameters Case Studies A.I.A. Guidelines Schedule and Budget Development Call For Entries to Professional Journals Public Input Survey •Draft Survey Distribution Collection and Tabulation Jury Selection Voting Advisory Photos and Drawings Competition Application Package Draft Assemble, Print and Mail Program Package Draft Assemble, Print and Mail Questions From Entrants Addendum Issued Draft Mailing Entries Due Judging Transportation, Lodging and Meals Awards Presentation Exhibition Assignment Committee Compton / Hunt Nota / Killen Di Monda Killen / Nota Di Monda Compton Nota / Hunt Nota / Hunt Hunt Committee Hunt Hunt Committee Committee / Hunt (page -3-) reflects the status of jury selection. (page -4-) is the call for entries to be published in journals. Addendum "C" (page -5-) is the Public Input Survey ADDENDUM "A" Draft: Competition Jury Jurors: Name: Company/Location Contact California Architect Name Recognition Architect Pier Experience Development Community Altemates: Frank Gehry Michael Rotundi Rob Quigly Doug Gardener William Fain Richard Keating Robert Marquis Los Angeles Los Angeles San Diego Seattle? Mc Guire Thomas Los Angeles Rouse Company Reston, Virginia Johnson Fain Perim Los Angeles Dean Dean Dean Pat (will Contact Dennis Tate) Pat Keating Mann Jemigan Rottet Los Angeles San Francisco Advisors (non-voting) Name: Company/Location Contact Consulting Pier Engineers City Staff Representative Mary Rooney Los Angeles County ? Lifeguards Moffit and Nichols Doug Stenhouse HB Department of Parks Dean and Recreation Joe ADDENDUM "B" Draft: Competition Call for Entries The Hermosa Beach Pier Competition Registration deadline: June 24, 1993 Submission deadline: September 1, 1993 Hermosa Beach, California. Entrants to "The Hermosa Beach Pier Competition" are asked to submit design proposals for the renovation and expansion of an existing public, recreational pier with an entrance plaza and County Lifeguard headquarters facility for a beachfront community in metropolitan Los Angeles. Prize money totaling $12,000.00 will be awarded. Co-sponsored by The Cabrillo Chapter of The American Institute of Architects and The Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce. Contact: Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce 323 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Voice: 310-372-1375 Facsimile: 310-798-2594 HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - Downtown Improvement Board 60 -Second Survey Did you know our City is planning to renovate the Hermosa PIER? Please let us know what you think...and mail this survey back to us right away. The postage is pre -paid and your ideas are important in planning the new pier! Are you currently a resident of Hermosa Beach? 0 Yes 0 No 1. What would you like to see on the pier? More seating 0 0 0 Larger fishing area- 0 0 0 Separate fishing area 0 0 0 More lighting 0 0 0 Bicycle racks 0 0 0 Other: Low Moderate High Priority Priority Priority 2. What facilities would you like at the end of the pier? Restaurant 0 0 0 Convenience store 0 0 0 Public restrooms 0 0 0 No facility at all 0 0 0 Other 3. What activities would you like at the pier entrance? Plaza with seating 0 - 0 0 Landscaped areas 0 0 0 Water fountain 0 0 0 Bicycle area 0 0 0 Other: 4. Would you like to see the end of Pier Avenue made into a plaza? 0 Yes 0 No If yes, how should the plaza be used? 0 Passive seating 0 Restaurant with seating 0 Open space, no seating ❑Landscaped Other. 5. Do you: Walk all the way to the end of the pier? 0 Yes 0 No Stop before reaching the end of the pier? 0 Yes 0 No Sit at the end of the pier? 0 Yes 0 No Fish from the pier? 0 Yes 0 No Think a larger police presence is needed near pier? 0 Yes 0 No Comments: Please send your completed survey to us right away BACKGROUND Following the R/UDAT visit to Hermosa Beach in October, 1992, the Chamber sponsored a day -long strategic planning conference in January, 1993 to: 1) develop a long-range implementation plan for the R/UDAT recommendations and 2) form a community group to help implement the plan. At that session, the structure for the Downtown Improvement Board (D.I.B.) was developed, keeping in mind five main categories identified for implementation needs. This organizational structure is clearly "objective based" and has proven successful in studying multiple concurrent priorities among the many recommendations. (Attachment A - Downtown Improvement Board 'Organizational Chart) Following the approval of the D.I.B. organizational structure, the R/UDAT recommendations were divided and prioritized into the five major categories identified in the R/UDAT report and "action plans" were written for each of the five areas. (Attachment B - D.I.B. Implementation Action Plans) To date, involvement on the Downtown Improvement Board has consisted of a cross-section of approximately 50 members of the community. Active participants include residents, business owners, property owners, city, chamber and County staff, elected officials and other interested parties. The regular meetings of the full D.I.B. are held the first Thursday of each month in Room 12 at the Community Center. The Chamber of Commerce provides two staff members to assist the volunteer members and in administrative and follow up duties. The D.I.B.'s Executive Committee, comprised of the Chairman, Vice Chairman, Chamber Executive Director and all five Division Chairs meet on the third Thursday of each month at 8 a.m. at the Chamber office for policy-making and financial decision-making items. In addition, the Business Development Division and Public Improvement Division each meet on a weekly basis due to the magnitude and complexity of the recommendations included in their respective areas. Other Divisions meet on an as -needed basis between the monthly D.I.B. meetings. While we recognize that there is a desire for a simple, numbered list of implementation priorities, we have discovered that there are many parallel priorities being addressed by individual Divisions of the D.I.B. To rank the objective of one Division as being more important than an objective of another Division would most likely be counterproductive. Each Division is diligently working simultaneously to achieve their respective objectives. -6- Included in this report is a matrix that reflects the Divisions of the D.I.B. and their relationships to one another. (Attachment -C - Implementation Chart) Financial Impact / Limitations on Implementation Progress Since funding is the primary requirement for implementation of nearly all of the R/UDAT recommendations, it is the final determinate in prioritization. When funding sources are clearly identified for each of the recommendations, a numerical listing of priority projects can .be compiled,. Existing consists downtown addition for pier funding for implementation of R/UDAT recommendations of $13,500 allocated by the Chamber of Commerce for revitalization efforts in their 1992-93 budget. In approximately $3 million in public funding is available and pier head renovations. Conclusion The continued support and involvement of the City Council in the endeavors of the Downtown Improvement Board is respectfully requested. Respectfully submitted, Carol Hunt, Executive Director Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce 1E1)0/ ti v Dean Nota, Chairman Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce Downtown Improvement Board -7- Chamber of Commerce Staff/Administration CAROL HUNT, Exec. Director BETSY MacALPIN, Admin. Asst. HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF C01MIIvIERCE DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT BOARD COMMUNITY Citizens /Business /Government. Downtown Improvement Board Chairman DEAN. NOTA Downtown Improvement Board Vice Chairman JERRY NEWTON Division Chairman FUNDING GARY WAYLAND City of Hermosa Beach Councilmembers Division Members SAM EDGERTON BOB ESSERTIER Division Chairman HELENE FROST PARKING & TRANS. Division Members City Staff Division Chairman PATRICK KILLEN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT Division Members City Staff Division Chairman Division Chairman DALLAS YOST DRUCKERIMARSHALL PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS Division Members City Staff Pier Design PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Division Members City Staff HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Downtown Improvement Board - Revitalization Action Plan Division: FUNDING Division Chair: Gary Wayland 376-0455 Division Goal: "identify public and private sources of funds; develop strategy to obtain funds and assist other Divisions of the Downtown Improvement Board to fund their projects." v OBJECTIVE ACTION FUNDING WHO WILL BY DONE a SOURCE ACCOMPLISH DATE Develop database of funding sources (private and public). 1A. Meet with city staff and other parties 1B. Meet with consultant(s) to research loan programs, seismic retrofit funding, etc. 1C. Research feasibility of forming Economic Development Corporation 1D. Present proposal of 1C. above to D.I.B. Executive Committee Division On-going Members Division On-going Members Division On-going Members Division 05/06/93 Chairman HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Downtown Improvement Board - Revitalization Action' Plan Division: BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT Divison Chair: Patrick Killen 318-1767 Division Goal: "To attract, retain and upgrade businesses in downtown Hermosa Beach; and to promote an image of community pride." N N GOAL ACTION FUNDING WHO WILL BY' DONE ro SOURCE ACCOMPLISH DATE 1. Appoint Ombudsman 1A. Confirm that City Manager City will assume this role 2. Diversify types of businesses. 1B. Confirm that Business n/a Advocacy Committee is actively working to promote ombudsman activity. Pat Spiritus 02/04/93 John Bowler 2A. Inventory/map existing uses. n/a (1) Get map of parcels 2A(1) Marty Moreno (2) Get data listings on: 2A(2) Marty Moreno Landlords & Jim Dewey Lessees Earthquake upgrade candidates Physical structure/SF/Construction type Business type Attachment B OBJECTIVE ACTION FUNDING SOURCE WHO WILL ACCOMPLISH BY DONE DATE (continued) 3. Recruit participants to be involved in the economic development process. 2A. (3) Create database Chamber 2A..(4) Analyze & categorize Chamber 2A. (5) Survey existing businesses a. Develop letter re: D.I.B. Chamber b. Interview businesses Chamber 2B. Examine industry trends and Chamber local business input/needs & desires. 2C. Examine demographics of Chamber residents and visitors. 2D. Examine & recommend Chamber changes in zoning codes 2E. Recommend target market Chamber and business types 3A. Develop plan based on inventory and analysis 3B. Recruit involvement at various levels. 3C. Develop education & communication vehicles. 2A(3) Marty/Jim 2A(4) Div. Members 2A(5) Div. Member 2A(5)a. Div./Staff 04/15/93 04/01/93 2A(5)b. Div. Members 06/01/93 2B. Division Members On—going 2C. Jim/Div. Members 2D. Division Members 2E. Division Members 3A. Division/Staff 3B. Division/Staff 3C. Division/Staff 013JEC IVE ACTION FUNDING SOURCE. WHO WILL ACCOMPLISH BY DONE DATE (continued) 4. Hire business recruiter (or other outside expert ie., advertising firm). 5. Promote downtown Hermosa Beach. 4A. Research (find/speak to) Chamber existing community business recruiters, 4B. Develop recommendatons for Chamber Chamber & City review, 5A. Develop slogan for the Chamber revitalization effort. 5A. (1) Promote downtown Chamber in citywide issue of HERMOSA SUN 5B. Develop slogan for the Chamber Business Development Division. 5C. Promote activities, projects, Chamber & Divisions of, the D.I.B. Division/Staff Division/Staff Division/Staff Division/Staff Publisher Division Division/Staff 05/01/93 04/02/93 10/01/93 06/01/93 03/02/93 06/15/93 04/02/93 07/01/93 On—going 01/15/93 02/10/93 03/15/93 04/12/93 w co Attachment B HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Downtown Improvement Board - Revitalization Action Plan Division: PARKING AND TRANSPORTATION Division Chair: Helene Frost 372-8435 • Division Goal: "To create improved, quality parking that supports and stimulates business and encourages pedestrian traffic and minimizes business/residential conflicts." OBJECTIVE ACTION FUNDING WHO WILL BY DONE SOURCE ACCOMPLISH DATE 1. Greater utilization of Lot C IA. Identify & evaluate VPD VPD and to include a parking structure potential funding Bonds, Division and possible retail frontage of Assesment Members the lot on Hermosa Avenue. District 1B. Identify program (above) for parking structure Division and possible retail & Members office frontage on Hermosa Avenue 04/16/93 03/15/93 01/94 1C. Develop criteria for RFP Division/Staff 04/94 1D. Develop list of consultants & advertise Division/Staff 05/94 1E. Commssion studies & design alternatives Division/Staff 08/94 Attachment B - page HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Downtown Improvement Board - Revitalization Action Plan Division: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS Division Chair: Dallas Yost 379-3339 • Division Goal: "To revitalize private property in downtown Hermosa Beach". OBJECTIVE ACTION FUNDING WHO WILL BY DONE SOURCE ACCOMPLISH DATE 1. Involve property owners in 1A. Develop letter re: Chamber Division Members 04/15/93 04/02/93 revitalization efforts. D.I.B.'s efforts. Chamber Staff 1B. Develop database Chamber Division Members 04/15/93 04/09/83 of addressees 2. Involve business owners in 1A. Send letter to each Chamber Division Members 05/01/93 revitalization efforts. business owner to Chamber Staff communicate D.I.B. programs Attachment HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Downtown. Improvement Board - Revitalization Action Plan Division: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS DivisionCo-Chair: Steven Drucker 798-2255 Division Co -Chair: Merna Marshall 372-1740 Division Goal: "To raise quality of public improvements, ensure public safety, improve community aesthetics and pride through cohesive design standards, create a more pedestrian orientation downtown, improve lifeguard facility and stimulate commerce." OBJECTIVE ACTION FUNDING WHO WILL BY DONE SOURCE ACCOMPLISH DATE 1. Pier/Pierhead re -design 1. Develop program for Chamber Division Members On-going 3/15/93 design competition Chamber Staff *Addendum Time Line A.I.A. Attached 2. Pier Ave. from Hermosa 2. Consider linkage To Be Avenue West to Pierhead. Determined 3. Strand improvements 3. Consider ways to To Be provide input to Determined address pedestrian/ bicycle interface 4. Biltmore Site 4. No D.1.B. position n/a on issue. Division Division. On-going On-going Attachment OBJECTIVE ACTION FUNDING SOURCE WHO WILL ACCOMPLISH BY DONE DATE (continued) 5. Greenwood Site 5. Determine status. 6. Upper Pier Avenue 7. Hermosa Avenue 6: Review possible design recommendation program. 7. Review possible design recommendation program. 8. PCH/Pier Avenue 8. Review possible recommendation To Be To Be Determined To Be Determined Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined Attachment B - Implementation Chart Business Analysis (Recniiter Business Developmen Private Parking FUNDING Improvelinnts Pier Ave. (fir) Pier Ave. (lapr) 7 0( Ombudsman Pier Pier Plaza .1 Hermosa Avenue A-Hachrrevtt G Strand Pedestrians Bike Path February 5, 1993 Mayor and Members of the City Council (,,4 -,k&--/-4—.---> Opti _ J a,1.� ;=L-A , /. Regular Meeting of April 13, 1993 SOUTH SCHOOL PARK CONCEPTUAL PLAN RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission that Council approve a conceptual plan for the South School site that would provide for a low impact neighborhood park containing approximately 70% passive green space; two (2) tennis courts; a combination volleyball/basketball court; a tot lot; picnic facilities; parking for 25 cars and pedestrian pathways. It is further recommended that Council direct staff to take the following specific actions to facilitate the Master Plan development of the site: 1) Submit the conceptual plan to the Coastal Commission for approval. 2) Prepare a request for bids for an architectural firm to provide designs and working drawings for the park. BACKGROUND The City purchased the 4.51 acre property from the School District in January, 1992 at a cost of $2.34 million to the Park and Recreation Facility Tax Fund. Since that time, the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission has been studying the site and taking public testimony from residents in order to formulate the beginnings of what will ultimately be a Master Plan for the park. As the topic has been on the Parks and Recreation agenda for some time, Council Members have been supplied with "South School Notebooks" that contain all of the previous agenda items about the park and action minutes Page 1 from relevant meetings. Notebooks are available for public review in the City Clerk's Office and at the Community Center. At their October 29, 1992 meeting, the Commission approved a conceptual plan for the park that is described in the analysis below and illustrated in Attachment A. As the City is still in the conceptual phase of Master Planning, the designs are created to highlight the Commission's recommendations for the park and are not intended as blueprints for park development. These designs were donated by a resident who lives adjacent to the park. The Planning Commission reviewed the conceptual plan at their February 16, 1993 meeting . They expressed approval for the conceptual plan and indicated that while they would like to maximize the green space in the park to the greatest extent possible, they did have some concerns that the 25 parking spaces indicated in the plan may be deficient. Individual comments from Commissioners are summarized in the minutes from their meeting (Attachment G). ANALYSIS: Public input In studying the South School site, the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission obtained public input from a number of areas. First, as the Planning Commission is aware, there is a Park and Recreation Master Plan referenced in the open space element of the City's General Plan. Designed to guide the orderly development of park and recreation facilities (and programs) through the year 2010, this plan was adopted by Council in February, 1990. The City formed a resident committee of 27 people who provided input to the document. The specific recommendations from the Parks and Recreation Master plan regarding South School are contained in Attachment B. The Parks and Recreation Commission held two (2) formal hearings on the subject, one in which residents in a 300' radius were noticed via the mail. In addition to the advertised hearings, aspects of the plan were placed on the regular agenda several times throughout the year. Page 2 Additional public input was solicited with a survey that appeared in the City's recreation brochure (mailed to every resident) and was distributed at various Parks and Recreation meetings and events. The responses to the survey are contained in a notebook at the City Clerk's Office and are summarized in the agenda item dated August 6, 1992 (in the South School Notebook). The Basic Concept: A neighborhood multi -use park Recognizing the City's dual need for recreation activities and passive open space, the Commission elected to stay with the general recommendations from the Master Plan that call for a neighborhood park containing a mixture of uses that could serve active recreational needs while fulfilling the desire the community has for the aesthetics and enhanced open space areas. There are a number of reasons that the Commission arrived at this decision. First, the City's park inventory contains two significant totally passive parks in the 50 acre beach and the 19 acre Greenbelt. The 7 acre Clark Field and the surrounding complex exists as the City's intensive use sports facility. The 5.33 acre Valley Park provides a multi -use neighborhood at the north end and the remaining 11 parkettes offer a mixture of uses from tot lots to basketball courts to picnic areas. It is projected that the prospective development of the South School site as a multi -use park would provide a south end anchor for the City, providing a flavor similar to though not identical to Valley Park on the North. With an emphasis towards encouraging maximum residential pedestrian access (thereby reducing parking requirements), the concept is inclusive of pedestrian walkways and entrances at every corner of the park. The Greenbelt is viewed to provide a link between the City's largest parks (Clark Field, Valley Park and South School) and offers the City a unique ability to create a continuous landscaped buffer at the entryway to the beach area. The Commission also attempted to select recreation facilities that would not create excessive demands for parking. The 25 spaces indicated in the conceptual plan are comparably less than the 77 at Valley Park (does not include the 19 available on Valley Drive) and the 46 (plus 74 on the adjacent Greenbelt) at Clark Field. A chart noting the various elements of the park concept by percentage of land use is included in Attachment C. Page 3 The Conceptual Plan: Elements (A) Open Space areas: The open space areas include a large open grass field, landscaped buffers at the perimeter of the park and picnic areas. Body Glove has made a verbal offer to the City to donate the area at the northeast corner of the park (on Valley Drive) to the City which would provide a substantial buffer for the proposed 22 car parking lot on the same corner. Grading would be done to provide interesting berms and contours to the flat areas of the park in order to enhance the aesthetics. (B) Recreation Facilities: Tot Lot: Playground equipment (occupying approximately 1,000 square feet) which would be protected from the rest of the park by some kind of barrier (safety). Some consideration may be given to equipment for older children if the building may be used for recreation programs (i.e., afterschool activities). Tennis Courts (2): Selected as popular/low impact facilities, these courts would be buffered from the parking lot area by a picnic/spectator/seating area that would be conducive to more sedentary activities and/or would provide an area for tennis players to wait for courts and socialize after matches. The City currently has eight well -utilized courts (Community Center and Clark Field). Combination Volleyball/Basketball Court: Designed to accommodate the picnic users who generally run the gamut of activities in a day. In combination with the open grass field, the Commission felt that this facility would provide a balance of offerings to park visitors. Open Grass Play Field: Instead of providing a field specific to one sport or another, the field was designed to accommodate casual and picnic uses as well as practice areas for youth teams in a variety of sports. This was not projected to be a location for league games (a higher intensity use); thus there is no night lighting (as there is at Clark Field) and no bleachers or skinned fields. Building: After exhaustive review, the Commission felt it would be prudent to wait until a pressing need for additional building space evolves (optimally one that would be revenue generating so as not place an undue burden on the Page 4 maintenance budget) before too much effort is placed in renovation. The Community Center meets the majority of the City's meeting room and lease needs at this time, however, the City does not currently have any parks in operation that have a building on site for exclusive recreation use (i.e., a space for equipment for youth programs). It is projected that once additional needs are identified that could assist the City in meeting the operational costs of opening the building, the City could retain one (1) of the four (4) classrooms as a youth recreation center. It is noteworthy that the Commission did suggest that the restrooms located in the building be renovated for general park use instead of constructing a new building in the park. They did add, however, that if refurbishing the existing restrooms did not result in a substantial cost savings over building new ones, they would favor a separate building. Lighting: The Commission is recommending that the park not be lighted for night use, however, security lighting will be an obvious necessity. There has been some discussion about the possibility of lighting the tennis courts (as they are not in a residentially sensitive area). Municipal Swimming Pool: The possibility of building a municipal swimming pool at the South School site was that topic of some discussion during the Parks and Recreation Master Plan study. The residents who participated in the study were split on this issue so it remained a possibility though not a definitive recommendation. Due to the substantial operating costs associated with a municipal swimming pool, the Parks and Recreation Commission was concerned that the City's general fund would not support these costs on an annual basis. The Commission was not entirely opposed to a pool but decided not to include one in the initial plan. Instead they would like to design the park with space that could ultimately be used as a pool site should the City's financial picture improve in the future. An agenda item dated May 21, 1992 is contained in the South School Notebook which outlines some of the potential costs associated with a municipal swimming pool. Clearly, the addition of a pool would change the flavor of the park from a low intensity to a higher, intensity recreational use. If a facility is built, some strong consideration to expanding the parking for the site should be given. Page 5 (C) Ingress/Egress & Parking: Pedestrian access: Would be provided from Valley Drive (no fences) on the entire east side of the park; 4th Street and Culper Court on the southwest side; and Loma Drive and Sunset on the northwest side of the park. Due to ADA requirements and the desire to accommodate persons of all physical abilities in the park, attention has been given not only to providing handicap access at the entrances to the park, but also by providing pathways throughout the park. Recreation facilities and playground equipment will reflect a similar attention to the needs of the disabled community. It is important to note that the Commission is inclined to request that the City retain the 10' right-of-ways at the westernmost portion of the park (see Attachment F) to provide additional pedestrian accessways. Some of the neighbors (who have put substantial effort into caring for these areas) have requested that the City vacate the property, however, the Commission feels that the land is too critical to overall park development to lose. A link with the Greenbelt would be established via a crosswalk and/or bridge crossing to enhance the pedestrian friendliness of the park. Vehicular access: The Commission proposes to keep the main vehicular access on Cypress Avenue in order to provide a safe and slower entry to the park (than may be provided with a Valley Drive entrance) and to allow space for a landscape buffer on the street side to enhance Valley Drive aesthetics. Clearly, due to the industrial nature of Cypress Avenue, creating a beautiful entryway to the park will be a challenge; however, it may prove to be beneficial both to the park and to the surrounding streets. The Commission was challenged with the location of the existing building (at the westernmost end of the park) with regards to vehicular access. They examined the possibility of providing vehicular access from Loma Drive, but the majority of the Commissioners felt that an access road along the park's north side could be buffered to reduce its intrusion on the open space and would provide for City maintenance needs and future short term and handicap access parking for the upper section of the park. Due to the Commission's decision to "moth ball" the building for now, the roadway would fall low on the list of prioritized park development. Page 6 Parking: As indicated above, the conceptual plan calls for minimal parking. It is difficult to find meaningful standards for parking in City parks (per acre or by facility), however, in comparison with most surrounding City parks, the 25 spaces indicated would fall on the low end (see Attachment D). Staff has some concerns that while an attempt has been made to create a concept that would dictate a low impact park, that the demand for additional parking may be an inevitability. FUNDING: NEXT STEPS The acquisition of the property exhausted the majority of the City's Park and Recreation Facility Tax Fund. This fund appreciates at the rate of approximately $60-100 thousand per year. The preliminary estimates from the Park and Recreation Master Plan projected the costs to develop the site at $500 thousand . In today's dollars, it is estimated that the park will cost approximately $600-700 thousand to build. For Fiscal Year 1992-93, the Council has appropriated $100 thousand to the South School project. Additional immediate potential sources of funding include $250 thousand from Proposition A and general fund monies from the PERs refund or reserves that could be utilized to accelerate park development and then reimbursed from the Parks and Recreation Tax Fund over the next few years. Careful review of the potential annual general fund commitment to operate the park (i.e., maintenance) on an annual basis is an obvious concern as well with preliminary estimates of up to $60 thousand per year including contracts, utilities, supplies and labor. It is obvious that absent a loan from the general fund, the park may be developed in phases. Despite that fact, it is critical for the City to create a Park Master Plan so that there is a rhyme to the reason of phased development and so that while there will be an immediate benefit to the community with the development of specific park elements, the overall plan will be realized in future years. Once the Council approves a conceptual plan for the park, the next step will be to develop a final design (and theme) for the park concurrently with establishing the priorities for development (dictated in part by the most Page 7 immediate renovation needs and by what the most desirable elements in the park are determined to be). As this plan will ultimately provide a park that will be used for generations to come, Council and resident input at this early phase in Master Plan development will be beneficial in assisting the City to build the best park possible for the community. The Commission and staff look forward to bringing this exciting project to fruition so that the benefits associated with this important acquisition may be realized in the near future. Fiscal Impact: None at this time. Currently there is $100 thousand budgeted in the Parks CIP Account for South School Park development. Staff will return to Council with cost estimates and an RFB for park design if the conceptual plan is approved. Respectfully submitted, Mary C. Rooney Attachments: Attachment A: Attachment B: Attachment C: Attachment D: Attachment E: Attachment F. Attachment G: Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Conceptual Plan for South School Suggestions from the Park and Recreation Master Plan Pie chart showing use of land by percentage List of parking space allotments various parks Open Space Zone Ordinance Memorandum from Public Works: Public Easements Planning Commission Minutes: 2/16/93 Page 8 ATTACHMENT "A" • POLO•OART a, pasioa • 0.0• •••• ...!..!!.... ', _ .tf .• • /0 • ••••• ••••••• 0.41. OPEN (MASS PLAY IMO „,. • •••••••••••• •• 4 111 7 !fl((f • 1.• I • ••••• ••• 1 ••••• • ( f PAO 44444 • • AO SI K °SUNBELT ACCESS Page 9 11.1•111.1,1 1 - 1- • • 1.. CITY OF HERMOSA BEA TOPOGRAPHIC SURE SOL/ill SCHOOL P AIIK SITE PrkaLimitusay PLAN 'Er- r5.3rrZ: mi r ranrrl () SEC riCm A • (,2:)GLC1iCHI A CCH41-0 trtl'V fl -A• r.."2,ska. T •.4 61. / •••-4.SY di."•• ••.".•1 VAL Y 0,0•0 r",•ningli • T •All•Ori..A./V01.4.17•Au. •••••1. 001....119 DMI•U• re) SECTION 8 r6Ar Cp) N 0 •AV Fic“.• Twis•-• ••••• ess.4 .'40....a OIL ....•rriol • • IGO 1.0416" WAY 0 SIMON C • ,O. r;••••••••-, r r 1,11 e•• ,1 • •••., CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOuTil SCHOOL P ARX SITE eCTIon 7 cr 7 Page 10 LE AUTO ENTRY EXTERIOR B UFF E-9 CIRCULATION BJTE-tiiCR SUFFER SIXTH STREET DEVELOP! _1 LINKAGE PARKING ENTRY TO I PARK CYPRESS AVENUE PASSIVE OPEN SPACZ PICNIC PLAYGROUND SPORTS COURTS BASKETBALL VOLLEYBALL OR POOL REC. BUILDING STAFF PARKING HARDCOURT e RESTROOM t —SHADE i STRUCTURE STORAGE SPORTFIELD BASEBALL SOFTBALL FOOTBALL SOCCER Page 11 PLAN X PROPOSED SOUTH SCHOOL • e , it z4 of f2ierrnosaaac POTENTIAL RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE BILTMORE SITE ocated on the Strand between 14th and 15th Streets, this sit. was once coupled by the Surf and Sand Club which later became the Biltmore Hotel. he site is owned by the City and has been the object of citizen concern ince the hotel building was removed in 1959. Two measures about the site n the November 1939 ballot failed: *one would have dedicated the site to .n urban park/plaza; the other would have combined the urban park/plaza ith retail commercial uses. This Master Plan recommends that this site bE .esignated as potential recreational open space and developed as an urban :ark. *The Biltmore site has been rezoned residential medium density. 'he Greg Jarvis Memorial, a sitting area looking over the ocean and :omprised of benches, drinking fountain, and ceramic plaque, is located .cross the Strand from the Biltmore Site. . SOUTH SCHOOL SITE South School at 425 Valley Drive is.a surplus school site, part of which been sold for private development. In its Open Space Element, the Cit: .,,opted a policy "to purchase or lease surplus .school property ... so that :he property can be maintained foc potential recreational open space and recreation use; (and to) prohibit the use of designated potential 7ecreation open space for development for other than potential recreation )pen space purposes even though sold to private ownership." (Open Space ;lenient, P. 55) Juring its June 27, 1989 meeting, the Hermosa Beach City Council made Jublic its intent to purchase the remaining 4.51 acres of the South School site as well as the .29 acres next to Edith Rodaway Friendship Park. This purchase is intended to provide potential recreational open space to be preserved for public use for current and future generations. proposal has also been made by Macpherson Oil Company to the School Jiscrict to lease one acre of the .South School site for oil storage. - rhe site has a sandy slope on its west side on which the abar.:-.Ioned school building is located. When the site -was used by the Bilingual School, an asphalt drive was installed from Valley Drive across the site to parking behind the building. Access to this parking which had previ o::sly been fro 5th Street had been blocked by In addition, the site contains old clay eau'i pinent that is rusted and in dr epa'__ . Re Side!:::al uS2s flan west and south sides c; the site, and somewhat ur.s: gntly _.,,n(:.'eroial/ind'ustr ial uses are located o the north. Valley C:ive is adjacent to the entire east side of t .e site. Ac-oss Valley .:rive is the :reentelt and Ardmore par:._tta. Development *of this site as a park would help meet the City's need for rec: eati on facilities. (See Plea e R2 5-57 for possible uses) SOUTH SCHOOL OBJECTIVE: to acquire this site by lease or purchase from the School District and develop it as a park. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ▪ Create entry and parking away from Valley Drive. ▪ Develop typical neighborhood park facilities: . sportsfield. . hardcourt area. . playground and tot lot. . restroom. . open play/passive area. ▪ Convert building to recreation use. ▪ Relate the park to Greenbelt and Ardmore Parkette. ▪ Design irrigation system. • Estimate of probable cost: Acquisition 51,600,000 Development $506,000 Note: Some workshop participants t`:cucht that South School would be a cccd location for a community swimming pool if the need is determined. The cost of a pool is not included in the estimate or probable cost. Page 13 SOUTH SCHOOL CONCEPTUAL PLAN: USE BY % RECREATION FACILITIES (9.0%) BUILDING (2.O%) PARKING/ACCESS ROAD (8.O%) PATHWAYS/PAVEMENT (13.0%) GRASS/TURF/SOFTSCAPE (68.0%) Attachment C Page 14 ATTACHMENT "D" PARKING SPACES NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS PARK/CITY TYPE OF PARK NO. OF SPACES ACRES SPACES PER ACRE SOUTH SCHOOL PARK Multi -use 25 4.51 5.5 IHERMOSA BEACH Neighborhood MARINE AVE. PARK Multi -use 93 7.6 12.2 MANHATTAN BCH + TRW adjacent LIVE OAK Multi -use 139 8.95 15.5 MANHATTAN BCH GLEN ANDERSON Multi -use 128 5.8 22 REDONDO BCH ALTA VISTA Multi -use 164 10.68 15.4 REDONDO BCH WILDERNESS PARK Passive 48 11.0 4,4 REDONDO BCH (picnic/camping) PERRY PARK Multi -use 57 4.13 13.8 REDONDO BCH Neighborhood ALTA LOMA Multi -use 10 5.7 1.8 TORRANCE EL NIDO Multi -use 60 12.3 11.9 TORRANCE EL RETIRO TORRANCE GREENWOOD TORRANCE MCMASTER TORRANCE Multi -use Neighborhood Multi -use Multi -use 70 4.8 14.6 15 3.44 41.11 67 . 5.5 12.2 Page 15 § 9.2-- MOSA BLA.CH C':Y CCC.., § 9.5 ARTICLE 9.2. RESERVED* Secs. 9.2-9_7,2. Reserved. ARTICLE 9.5. O -S OPEN SPACE ZONEt Sec. 9.5. Intent and purpose. The 0-S zone is intended to prohibit intensive urban develop- ment to those primary open space areas of the city which are 'Editor's note --Ord. No. 82-694. adopted July 13. 1982, repealed former §§ 9.2-923 which pertained to an OED overlay existing development district and was derived from Ord. No. 81.679. § 3, adopted Dec 8. 1981. tEditor's note—Ord. No. N.S. 503, § 1. adopted Dec 23. 1974. added Art. 9.5, 4§ 9.5-9.5.8, to App. A as herein set out. Additionally, it should be noted that an initiative Ord. No. 84.761. §§ 1-4, passed. approved. and adopted by the elector. ate at a special election held Nov. 6, 1984. provided that the approval of the electorate of the city be required to modify; amend. or repeal the land use element or the open apace element of the City of Hermosa Beach General Plan concerning those certain lands described in the ordinance. Subsequently, Ord. No. 864844, §§ 1-6. passed by the electorate at the general election held Nov. 4, 1986, provided u follows: . Section 1. Any proposed modification. amendment, or eliinination of the Open Space designated areas of the General Plan identified in Section 2 of this ordinance and shown on Exhibit A. available in the office of the City Cleric, shall be prohibited without a vote of the electorate. Section 2. The following General Plan Open Space designated arena shall remain as such as stated in Section 1 herein: 1. Valley Park (Gould Ave. & Valley Dr. 2. South Park -/Bicentennial (4th Street) 3. Greenwood Park (Aviation & P.C.3l 4. Fort Lou -of Fun Park (6th Street) 5. Seaview Park (19th St & Prospect) 6. Clark Stadium 114,.., eation Center (Valley Dr. & 11th St) 7. Ingleside Park (Ingleside and 33rd St) 8. Moondust Park (N. of Meyer CL & S. of 2nd St) 9. 8th and Valley Park 10. Ardmore Ave_ at 5th Street Park 11. Hermosa View School site 12. Prospect Heights School site" 13. South School site Supp. No. 5-88 505 Page 16 ^ r TAC? -L :1 T § 9.5 Apo=:t 7i 1 { n-7.0NTNG § 9.5 14. Hermosa Valley School site 15. North School site • Section 3. If any section or portion of this initiative ordinance is declared invalid by a court of proper jurisdiction. the remaining sections or portions are to be considered valid. Section 4. By this ordinance. Initiative Ordinance No. 84-761 (Open Space Initiative.l adopted by the people on November 6, 1984, is hereby expressly repealed. • Section 5. There shall be no modification. amendment or repeal of any provi- sion herein except by a vote ai the people. Supp. No. 5-88 508.1 Page 17 § 9.54 A.?FENDLX ZONING § 9.5-1 necessary to assure pe=anent ocen space in and for public Darks and recreation areas;;.d where such intensive urban develop- ment would adversely affect public use and natural environmen- tal benefits. (Ord_ No. N.S. 503, § 1, 12-23-74) Sec. 9.5-1. Permitted uses. Primary open space comprises public and private areas devoted to recreational, leisure, cultural and aesthetic purposes, and in- cludes the following j. ses: Public and private parks, including beach areas. Educational buildings and playgrounds. Recreation centers, public and private. Public utility strictures and corridors. Riding, bicycling and hiking trails and pedestrian ways. Public governmental buildings. Historical monuments and areas ofhistorical significance. Public malls and plazas Public or privately owned land when the intensive use of said land would endanger the public health, safety or gen. eral welfare, including: ..• , _ ' (1) (2) (3) Areas where natural topography may be so steep as to create a hazard and/or where the grading or develop- ment of the land would endanger public health or safety due to unstable geologic conditions, soil insta- bility, erosion, or flooding. Areas subject to severe seiSmir• hazards, inducting surfac ruptu-, from faulting or ground shaking. Areas subject to flooding or inundation from storm water. (j) Land which is su'tstantialy in its natural stag is of unique natal beauty (natural land forms, prominent features, 1. ndscpf, natural vistas) available to pub - Supp. No. 4-87 509 Page 18 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE § 9.5-6 lic aces or or whiah is of pa ocular or scentinc value. (k) Ocean or public water areas, said areas being restricted solely to recreation and navigation purposes. (1) Transit uses: (1) The accommodation of railroad tracks and mainte- nance of same. (2) Signals (and other operative devices). (3) The movement of rolling stock, freight, passengers. (4) Landscaping and related appurtenances. (Ord. No. N.S. 503, § 1, 12-23-74; Ord. No. 82-701, § 1, 8-24-82) Sec. 9.5-2. Lot coverage. Maximum building coverage of land area in the 0-3 zone shall lot exceed ten (10) percent. (Ord. Na. N.S. 503, § 1, 12-23-74) Sec. 9.5-3. Height. No building shall exceed a height of two (2) stories or twenty - 1,,, (25) feet above the existing or finished grade, whichever is 1(Ord. No. N.S. 503, § 1,12.23.74) ' Sec. 9.5-4. Off-street parking Iimitation. ' No more than ten (10) percent of land area shall be used 'or off-street parking required or not. (Ord. No. 503, § 1, 12-23-74) • • Sec. 9.5-5. Building setbacks. • • . All structures shall be set back from all lot lines not less than twenty (20) feet. (Ord. No. N.S. 503, § 1, 12-23-74) Sec. 9.5-6. Signs. Total sign area shall not exceed one (1) percent of land area and shall be wall or ground signs only. All new signs shall be re- viewed by the improvement commission prior to their installa- tion. (Ord. No. N.S. 503, §.1. 12-23-74) Supp. No. 4-87 510 Pa gP 1 c § 9.5-7 APPENDIX A—ZONING § 9.62.2 Sec. 9.5-7. Landscaping. All yard or open areas shall be attractively landscaped with the possible exception of where such areas are used for court games, buildings or parking. All landscaped areas shall be per- manently irrigated. (Ord. No. N.S. 503, 3 1, 12-23-74) Sec. 9.5-8. Planned development permit required. All new construction within an O -S 'zone shall be subject to obtaining a planned development permit under procedures set forth in Article 7.5 of Zoning Ordinance No. N.S. 154, as amend- ed. Sections 9.5-2 through 9.5-7 may be waived or modified where in the opinion of the planning commission topography and/or design considerations warrant such waiver or modification. (Ord. No. N.S. 503, § 1, 12-23-74) ARTICLE 9.6 SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS [DIVISION 1. GENERALLY] [Secs. 9 .1, 9.61. Reserved]. D ISION 2. PLAN AREA NO. Sec. 9.62-1. Author This specific plan area4s an instru• ent for implementing the general plan pursuant to ticle 8 hapter 3, of the State Plan- ning and Zoning Law (Califor 'a ' •vernment Code Sections 65450 et seq). (Ord. No. 86-860, 10- : .) - . Sec. 9.62-2. Locatio nd descriptJon. _ The subject pro• -rty is fronting on 6t known as 721, 3 Sixth Street. The prbp lots which sloping to the west, and hav thousaneight hundred eighty-seven and squar feet. (Ord. No. 86-860, 10-28-86) Street and is generally ty consists of two (2) total area of five tw. tenths (5,887.2); Supp. No. 6-89 511 Page 20- ATTACHMEMT "F" CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM DATE: January 4, 1992 TO: Mary Rooney, Director of Community Resources FROM: Charlie McDonald, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: South School Park Site I have reviewed the encroachments in the field and find the following: 1. Lot #23 has the building face virtually on the alley property line. The rear yard enclosed by a 3'-4' high wall occupies the entire 10' alley. 2. Lot #24 has a sauna enclosed by a chain link fence which encroaches across the alley and into the park site a couple of feet. 3. The building at lot #27 has a stairway leading to the second floor which is an encroachment onto the alley. 4. At the northwest corner of the park site there are two chain link fences across the panhandle south of the alley. The northerly adjoining lot is enclosed with a wood board fence. There is no question but that these encroachments, whether covered by permit or not, may be inconsistent with the ultimate park use. However, until plans are imminent which conflict with these encroachments, the owners should not be contacted. There are two reasons for this. a. It would be rather poor public relations to require the removals unless the property was needed for improvements. b. There are numerous other projects with much higher priorities which should be pursued by the limited staff that we currently have in Public Works. Page 21 A current partial listing of Public Works projects follows: Fix Roof at Clark Field Assembly Bldg. Hermosa AVe. (Using FAU funds) Annual Street Resurfacing Tree Planting (DOFFP grant) Crosswalk at 29th & Manhattan Pier Sewer Head -Loss Check City Horizontal & Vertical Control Continue Pressure on Massey Ave. Storm Drain Sewer Repair Project Rodaway Park Resurface Tennis Courts Clark Field Wall & Fencing Storm Drains Budget Preparation ty/cmmr Page 22 •Jo � : -.. 0,3 'r • od' Si 141 iZer 2 0£ ,Lb.LL Z 0 ON O • 0 N N 12. I I. 39' W S.=:zc<.; "- '170:z. v O %LOM A \ Page 23 ALLE'( DRIVE N 77'48 13' E • / / • 10.00' / ..1 •"/ \• , / / I /: , v. — i "/ ' //// ii; I/ ' I /•// , ili ft, 1 1 i 046) I / i i / 4 . / i ';1 .xi i .‘!-;13 t //1;ii , ''',,,'H, ) / ! I 1 •t; / 11 / i ,j. ., f . \. 1 / 1 :: ) 4 !. ; ! i I 1 I ...A.--4-ii:j \ \.. 0/ / i ! rbr.tin ' ..t.,%i t, / ,,,i: ! ; r.'l'i!\NI Iiiiiii illi1 11114111:11L 24 1,14 -xi 11 71 is%\tipq Tflil'4.9-1'1'-i--i'lt*\t• sl jil!xi.)!;1111\! ill '11) i. . t .1..11 : II,' \II Ii' IL:1 , . i 11 , , 1 I'liL‘t 1 11111 [111 r! ix' i it,,,px)c)Li\IIIIIIY\ I fq1;1\1 N\ .\\\' 5i4E12 'Y'r A Ilx1 1 \ \\ Li A \*\, liTILII \II \ 1 \ I\ \\‘ ‘ . .\ ' \\\\\A li• 't. ; ti \ \ \ \\ \ \ V.\\ xl 't —...C.. "43; i \ ) 1 H ._t1:... J xl /i // /) i I :s1\? .\ / 1/ / l 1 eN43 \ / --IT; rn--- /xi/ / 1 );/ /1:7 ,/ / i ; I \ (25, 4 TH ISTREET \} • RF —777'7 • : a Page 24 ATTACHMENT "G" HEARING SOUTH SCHOOL PARK CONCEPTUAL PLAN. Recommended Action: To review and make recommendation. Ms. Rooney presented the Staff Report and recommended, after discussion, the conceptual plan be forwarded to the City Council with a recommendation for approval. She noted the Planning Staff supported the proposed concept of a "multi -use" park, detailed the proposed uses and stated the most intensive recreational facilities would be located in the northeast portion of the park. Ms. Rooney commented upon Staff's concerns regarding parking availability and impact upon the neighborhood.. Ms. Rooney detailed other areas for consideration included parking access directly from Valley Drive, continued maintenance of the existing building, possible visibility obstruction by the proposed berms and the adequacy of the buffering and perimeter fencing adjacent to the residences to the south and west. Discussions had been held regarding installation of a swimming pool, which would change the flavor of the park. The Commission recommended the park be designed to accommodate a future pool location, but that it not be addressed immediately. Ms. Rooney discussed the donation of property adjacent to the park which improved the possibilities of parking, vehicle and pedestrian access to the park. She felt the Commission had reflected in the majority the suggestions made by the people who had responded, regarding the park activities. P.C. Minutes 2-1G-93 Page 25 Comm. Marks felt precious land was being used to parking and discussed the handicapped parking requirements, park elevations, current condition and facilities within the existing building with Ms. Rooney and Mr. McDonald, Public Works Director. Chmn. Merl felt the use of bicycles should be encouraged and discussed. with Ms. Rooney the expense of building maintenance, community needs, future revenue streams being considered and possible parking needs based upon park uses. Comm. Di Monda discussed with Ms. Rooney the possibility of renting office spaces within the existing buildings. He requested that the potential parking requirement be provided, noting the building was definitely below standards. Comm. Di Monda felt the park did not have adequate planned parking 'and objected to the provision of three spaces for maintenance staff and the large driveway. Steve Crecy, PRCR Commissioner, responded by explaining the PRCR Commissioners had felt the parking should be pulled away from the residential area, with only a few spaces left for maintenance and other needs. He stated the PRCR Commission had determined that, although there was cosmetic work needed, the brick re -enforced building was very sound and had been worked into the proposed plan. Mr. Crecy discussed the park access and the maintenance crew access provided by the proposed road. Comm. Di Monda suggested the 10 -foot walkway be designed as a bicycle or roller-skating path. Ms. Rooney responded affirmatively, also detailing the areas for sedimentary activities. Dani Peirce, PRCR Commissioner, discussed a proposed shaded area near the tennis courts which would allow people to engage in other activities while waiting to use the courts. She discussed with Comm. Di Monda the walkway provisions for security and ease of use for children's strollers .and pedestrians. She noted the topography "rolling effect" of the proposal which would enhance the feeling of a neighborhood park. Chmn. Merl thought this was very effective. Comm. Di Monda commented that installation of a pool would change the parking requirements. Ms. Pierce felt the aspect of the park would be entirely changed if a pool were installed and would result in redesign of the park and an additional parking requirement. Comm. Di Monda agreed access should be at Cypress Avenue and not Valley Drive. Ms. Rooney stated the City's tennis courtswere heavily utilized, volleyball supplies would be on a "bring your own" basis due to present finances. Comm. Suard suggested the building be used for handball and ping pong. Ms. Rooney P.C. Minutes 2-16-93 Page 26 responded that currently a revenue stream was not available to support the opening of the building. She explained the open grass field could be used for practice by Little League and other children's sports organizations, but not for actual games. She explained the City had seriously deleted the Parking Lot Facility Tax Fund by the purchase of this property and discussed the possible availability of other funding, as well as the prioritization of the park's development. Comm. Di Monda stated the basketball courts at Clark Stadium remained lit even when it was raining or not in use and suggested "pay for lighting" machines be installed to assure the lights were off when the courts were not in use. Ms. Rooney stated the PRCR Commission had concluded this was not a cost effective solution due to vandalism and commented her Staff could turn the lights off when it was raining. Comm. Suard discussed with Ms. Rooney the possibility of the park having an area -for dogs, which had been rejected by the PRCR Commission. Ms. Rooney noted dogs could be in the park if they were on leashes. Hearing opened by Chmn. Merl at 9:08 p.m. Francis Parker, 521 1/2 Loma Drive, suggested the Commission visit the site. She stated that problems had been experienced by the residents due to parties, drugs, homeless people and fights. The only time that area was peaceful was when the park had been closed to access. She suggested the installa- tion of light-sensitive lighting for security purposes. She felt the access could recreate vehicle confusion due to the narrow streets, noting several residents used Loma Drive as an access to their garages. Others would see them enter the street and think it was an access street. She felt that street widths should be considered when access streets were determined. She mentioned that when Loma Drive access had been gated because of the problems experienced with signs slanting and asphalt cracking due to sliding sand. She felt this area was inappropriate for placement of handicapped ramps or other construction. Tom Morley, Loma Drive, felt the plan was excellent, was pleased to see a proposal for an area in which children could_ safely play and recommended the Commission tour the park to view the narrowness of the street, pedestrian access and the proposed location of the wheelchair ramp. He stated the wheelchair ramp location was not practical or sensible. He recommended that sand -based volleyball courts be installed rather than basketball courts. J.R. Revicsky, PRCR Commissioner, stated the proposed 10 -foot walkway was for security purposes, in that a police car could maneuver when necessary. The Loma Drive access for both P.C. Minutes 2-16-93 Page 27 handicapped and other vehicles was included in the initial plans, although no clear requirements have been determined. Further review will be conducted prior to implementation. Provision had been made for a volleyball court, based upon expressed needs and for the convenience of residents. He stated other parks within the City had basketball courts with no parking provided and were not experiencing any problems. He stated the parking, by design, was small to assure this would be a neighborhood park. Comm. Marks commended the quality of the presentation drawing. Mr. Revicsky stated Brian Mitchell, a local resident, had made the drawing, had donated his time and efforts, and made the Commission's job easier. No one else wished to speak regarding this item, and Chmn. Merl closed the Hearing at 9:26 p.m. Comm. Di Monda noted his philosophical difference with the plans, in that he felt the Police Dept. did their best work when walking within the parks. He objected strongly to the roadway. Ms. Rooney reiterated the need of access for the maintenance crew. Comm. Di Monda felt the maintenance crew should also walk within the park. Chmn. Merl expressed the Commission's desire to see as much "green area" as possible and thanked the Parks and Recreation Dept., as well as. Ms. Rooney, forthe presentation. The Commission agreed the presentation was excellent. MOTION made by Comm. Suard, seconded by Comm. Marks, to SUPPORT of the conceptual plan as.submitted, with inclusion of the comments made by the Planning Commission. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Suard, Chmn. Merl None Comm. Oakes None -- PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY LANDSCAPING PROGRAM. Recommended �-'on: To direct Staff as dee Mr. Schubach stated sending a memo had been idea. He explained thr City would be fund' possible gran Schubach. draw ed sent appropriate. repor ad been prepared after ouncil, who had approved the lternatives, noted the he assistance of ated. Mr. wou . • . veto suggeste the landscaping wi which could be further inve a licensed landscape architect plans. He stated that if a grant were City would have to pay for the maintenance. Page 28 not obtain - P.C. Minutes 2-16-93 Ae-‹.11c t7 6' Pt1O70,2 RE 4e3c37kii✓0- ft i' H E PRofcn-S ' c ri?oin 5 i T p) . t 7b T� � (sci-rozu...) (N TI n/ r o r 77e S c o os is Tcp sem,,,/ _, _- 7 7 is P_Rc2-Pos 0.Av 7- �5 xi- Og I V WA tom_ re S VS � r4 L �.g IR; :4G -c" dNd / 5 4/0 7 . 06- .Q //Ochi P6 le 077/ 4U1-- S 4tYO 4-0 A4/1- oA./S AL -co V&?/_J//4 RAO ��d �� Li "xi .o Wul-0 NV:7 e - cJ,l : /�1� - rote. I°i-.0, s-ri /"0f IJ/t9 Th Iv/ 1 cc. A 7 -`Tfy L- L iVt7 O 4O4i)(1 W 0 rJLp $i 1/&* :c0s77. `_ ra /53'&7"06 /4(7c) /��S,lf ,FI �✓`7'� Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council /--g- 9-3 March 15, 1993 City Council Meeting of April 13, 1993 ADOPTION OF SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution adopting the final draft of the Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and the Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) and an environmental negative declaration for the City of Hermosa Beach for the purpose of complying with requirements.. of AB 939. BACKGROUND In 1989 the California State Legislature enacted and the Governor approved AB 939, "The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989" (CIWMA) which reorganizes the State's solid waste management planning process. The act establishes requirements to plan and implement integrated waste management programs which will divert 25% of the solid waste from landfills by 1995 and 50% by 2000. In general, AB 939 has done four major things: 1) Reorganized the California Waste Management Board by reducing its membership to six full-time members and renamed it the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB); 2) Created a new, integrated waste management planning process, including recycling goals for cities and counties; 3) Strengthened the certification criteria and performance standards for Local Enforcement Agencies (LEA); and 4) Modified and recodified the Public Resources Code. To provide Hermosa Beach with a means by which the City could share the costs, resources, efficiency, and credibility with cities striving to meet the same objectives mandated by AB 939, a Joint Powers Agreement with the County of Los Angeles, the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County and the cities of Manhattan Beach, Lomita, Lawndale, Hawthorne and Gardena was approved by City Council on October 23, 1990. With this group we contracted with Emcon & Associates to prepare our individual Preliminary and Final SRRE and HHWE reports. These individual Final reports will be incorporated into the Los Angeles County Integrated Management Plan (COIWMP) that will be submitted to the State. The Preliminary Draft was approved by the County .TaskForce-and, as required by AB 939, a public hearing was held 1 (November 26, 1991) to solicit citizen input and provide councilmember comments on the Preliminary Draft SRRE and HHWE. In previous months AB 939 has undergone some significant modifications; most recently, mandated by AB 2494, was how jurisdictions would demonstrate compliance with diversion goals. Previously, a waste generation method involving meticulous counting of all diversion and disposal was to be used in 1995. That has changed as jurisdictions are now to measure the absence of waste. In effect, by measuring the increase or decrease of waste disposed, diversion is indirectly measured, and when compared to the base line year of 1990, diversion compliance is demonstrated. The newest addition to the SRRE is the Nondisposal Facility Element (NDFE) as mandated by AB 3001. NDFs by definition recover at least 5% of the incoming volume of waste, butmust be required to have a solid waste permit. This excludes most recycling centers, hauler drop-off depots,. and small compost sites (less than 15 cubic yards) from having to be included in the NDFE. However, all other recovery operations that must have a solid waste permit need to be included. Transfer stations that recover less than 5% are to be included in the NDFE, but are not subject to Board approval. Each jurisdiction is required to prepare a NDFE, adopt it, and append it to the SRRE. A NDFE must include all nondisposal facilities (NDFs), existing, proposed, and to-be-modified,within the jurisdiction and outside if the jurisdiction plans to utilize it. It must also include a description of area(s) that could be used to site NDFs. The NDFEs will be included in the California Integrated Waste Management Plan (COIWMP) submitted by the County to the Board for approval. Disposal Reporting System: According to the Board, only permitted disposal and transformation facilities (DTFs) must submit "periodic" reports on waste by weight or volume by jurisdiction of origin. Facilities must report at least annually to the county, who must submit data to local jurisdictions and. the Board. Haulers and transfer stations "tell" operators of DTFs the origin(s) of waste collected. With the difficulties of multijurisdictional collection by haulers, "origin" may not be easily reportable. It may be best that local jurisdictions obtain their own information from their haulers to support or verify county estimates. All jurisdictions are required to submit annual reports to the Board at least one year after approval of the COIWMP. Diversion Reporting System: Some reporting of diversion is still required of jurisdictions as well as recyclers and composters. Local jurisdictions who operate or fund programs must report diversion in their annual reports to the Board. Periodic diversion reports will be required from public, private, and nonprofit facilities whose business involves collecting materials. for recycling or composting. Reports are submitted to the County. How reporting will be done is not decided at this time- - 2 - . After adoption of the City's Final SRRE and HHWE, the plan is for jurisdictions to prepare a preliminary draft of the NDFE, and submit it to the Local Task Force and the Board for initial comment, in a manner similar to the SRR elements. Following comments, a final draft is prepared and submitted to the Task Force for final review. Then, a final report is prepared and adopted by the jurisdiction. There is no need for CEQA compliance for the document; however, all NDFs identified in the NDFE are subject to CEQA requirements. Final regulations may be completed by December 1993, so there is no absolute need to begin the NDFE process now. However, NDFEs will be included in the COIWMP, so there may not be considerable time lag between starting the NDFE process, and adoption and submittal to the County, given .that the CIWMP may be due in 1995. The NDFE will be a brief document and is expected to be appended to the SRR Element. Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan and Conformance: This is the document that will integrate all of the SRR elements, HHW elements, the Countywide disposal facility siting element, the NDFEs, and the County's unincorporated area(s) SRR element into one document (reportedly to consist of a stack of paper 14 feet thick for L.A. County), that will be submitted to the Board for approval. L.A. County will be among the first counties to submit a Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan (COIWMP) as the area cannot show adequate landfill capacity beyond 5 years. Once regulations are finalized, the County will have a limited amount of time to prepare the COIWMP. The Board will review its contents within 60 days of submittal and may send a notice of deficiency (NOD) to the County and/or specific jurisdictions within the County, to make changes in the documentation. We don't anticipate any changes being requested, but if they are, local jurisdictions will have a set number of days (120) to respond to the comments. The Board will act upon the final submittal within 120 days, and either approve or disapprove the COIWMP. Any problems that the Board has with an individual jurisdiction's documentation will not delay the approval process. so some jurisdictions may lag behind the COIWMP's approval for varying reasons. Once approved, the annual reporting process noted by AB 939 and AB 2494 will begin on the first January after one year following the date of approval. The Board shall review each city's Element not less than every two years to determine if the Element, is being emplemented.. Failure to implement an approved Element subjects the city to administrative civil penalties of up to $10,000 per. day. One of the more difficult aspects of the COIWMP package is the County Siting Element. The Siting Element must describe area(s) to be used for disposal facilities that are consistent with all applicable general plans. If an area is inconsistent with applicable general plans, it will be designated a tentative area. This status remains until it is made consistent with applicable general plans. The Siting Element shall include resolutions from each affected jurisdiction of the County stating the area is consistent with general plans. The Siting Element must be approved by a majority of the cities within the County and by the County as well. Cities must act within 90 days ofreceipt of the Element or failure to act will be deemed approval as defined by the law. Implementation programs of the SRRE include the following: The continuation of our curbside recycling program with the monthly reporting system from the hauler (Browning-Ferris Industries). Developing an at -source collecting program that would require commercial generators to provide for the recovery of all recyclables. The goal is to divert at least 550 tons per year. • Development of an ordinance to restrict the disposal of designated recyclable materials by commercial and residential generators. Implementing a business waste recovery initiative that would include requiring haulers to provide recycling services t -o commercial generators; establish an ordinance to require businesses to submit a recycling plan to the City describing their existing and planned diversion activities; require businesses to report diversion quantities annually, with possible restrictions on business license renewal. Developing a market development program consisting of two elements: 1) lobby at the regional and legislative levels to encourage the development of additional markets for recycling, and 2) enact a policy that encourages the procurement of products with recycled material content. ▪ Encouraging, through a business information campaign, the procurement of products containing recyclable material by area businesses. ▪ Developing comprehensive educational campaign to inform residents and businesses of programs and encourage them to recycle. • Providing technical assistance, information and incentives to businesses conducting or considering institutional/office recycling programs. . Diverting for composting 40% of the total yard waste generated per year that is not diverted by other programs. . Investigating in conjunction with area cities and businesses the implementation of a regional mixed solid waste composting facility. • y • Insuring proper management and disposal of special wastes cooperating with neighboring cities to develop local recycling capabilities for targeted special waste. (Includes bulky, difficult to handle items such as tires, construction and demolition wastes, and white goods which are appliances such as stoves and refrigerators.) • Developing a construction and demolition waste program requiring permit applicants to prepare a plan for how inert solid waste that is generated during the project would be segregated and recycled. As a condition of approval, a minimum recycling rate would be established for each project. The developer would be required to provide documentation at the completion of the project of the quantity and type of wastes disposed and diverted, and the destination of those diverted materials. To ensure compliance, reports could required as part of the final inspection of new construction. by • To avoid duplication of effort, planning and coordinating with the Cities and County that form the Joint Powers Authority in developing its education and public information programs; develop a multilingual SSR element promotional campaign; encourage schools to develop curricula that educate students about source reduction, recycling and composting. The executive summary and introduction of the SRRE (attached to this report) briefly describes the scope of each component and Table No.1 summarizes the proposed programs under each component. The summary also describes capital and annual cost for SRRE implementation. Each component of the SRRE contains objectives, program alternatives, evaluation of alternatives, program selection, program implementation plan (both short term to 1995 and medium term to the year 2000) and implementation cost. It is important to note that capital costs associated with implementing the SRRE are projected at $233,250. Since all programs are not scheduled for implementation simultaneously, the costs would be spread over several years. Included in the annual costs are a new full time employee position of solid waste specialist. This position is necessary to develop, implement and monitor the wide variety of new programs contained in the SRRE. The funding component describes available methods to raise revenue to cover anticipated cost. The Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) proposes that the city rely primarily on L.A. County Department of Public Works and L.A. County Sanitation District sponsored regional programs for household hazardous waste disposal. These programs will be expanded in the future to include mobile collection programs. The regional household hazardous waste programs will be funded by increased tipping fees at landfills which will ultimately by passed on to users through refuse rates. City costs involved - 5 with Household Hazardous Waste should be limited to assistance in education and public information. SUMMARY The SRRE and HHWE, in compliance with the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, represent significant planning and management documents to guide waste disposal practices of the city well into the future. Implementation of the programs of the SRRE and HHWE will require commitment of considerable city resources in terms of staffing and funding. Carole Lock a t, Administrative Aide Dept. of Building & Safety Concur: Concur: gs„ Frederick R. Ferrin, William Grove City Manager Building & Safety Director carole/adoption 4 - 6 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7 RESOLUTION 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ADOPTING THE FINAL DRAFT OF THE SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS MANDATED BY ASSEMBLY BILL 939 WHEREAS, the City Council of The City of Hermosa Beach is committed to meeting or exceeding the recycling and waste reduction requirements of the California Integrated Solid Waste Management and Recycling Act (AB 939, 1989); and WHEREAS, the City is an active member of the South Bay Integrated Waste Management Joint Powers Authority (JPA) which was formed to address the mandates of AB 939; and WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach's Source Reduction and Recycling and Household Hazardous Waste Elements were developed in response to Assembly Bill 939; and WHEREAS, AB 939 requires every City and County in the State of California to prepare a SSR element that identifies how each jurisdiction will maximize the diversion of waste away from landfilling and meet the minimum mandatory waste diversion goals set by the State of 25% by 1995 and 50% by 2000; and WHEREAS, this SSR and HHW element is consistent with Public Resources Code Section 40000 et seq., and the draft regulations developed by the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) entitled "Planning Guidelines for Preparing, Revising and Amending Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plans" dated December 5, 1990; and WHEREAS, requirements have been met in regard to the Negative Declaration through compliance with the Governor's Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse reviewfor environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby adopt the final draft of the City of Hermosa Beach's Source Reduction and Recycling and Household Hazardous Waste Element. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1993. PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: TLLii/� CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Hermosa Beach's Source Reduction and Recycling (SRR) and Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) elements were developed in response to Assembly Bill 939, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939). AB 939 requires every city and county in the State of California to prepare an SRR element that identifies how each jurisdiction will meet the mandatory waste diversion goals set by the State of 25% by 1995 and 50% by 2000. The programs -and objectives in the SRR element are organized according to the short-term (ST = 1991 to 1995) and medium-term (MT = 1996 to 2000) planning periods. The law also requires every jurisdiction to develop an HHW element to plan for the proper management of hazardous wastes that are generated by households. This section presents a summary of each of the components included in the SRR and HHW elements. A glossary of terms and acronyms used throughout this document is provided in Appendix F. SOLID WASTE GENERATION STUDY COMPONENT A solid waste generation study was conducted to quantify and characterize the solid waste generated, diverted, and disposed by the City of Hermosa Beach. Results of the solid waste generation study are summarized in Figure 1. Currently, 20,994 tons of solid waste are generated in the City annually. Through a number of existing diversion programs operated by the City and by the private sector, 4,098 tons annually are diverted from disposal at nearby landfills. This existing level of solid waste diversion equals approximately 19.5% of the current solid waste generation. The disposal waste stream composition is presented in Figure 2. This is the combined waste stream composition from the residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. SOURCE REDUCTION COMPONENT Source reduction simply means producing less waste. Because source reduction is intangible, it is the most difficult to quantify. Some .examples of existing source reduction activities in Hermosa Beach include repair of -+020101\HERMOSA\EXSUM.DOC:VCsbz 1 Rev.O 5/4!92 P r 1 4-. Figure 1 Solid Waste Generation Analysis City of Hermosa Beach Solid Waste Generation (tons/year) Residential 12,058 Commercial 6,392 Industrial 2,544 Total 20,994 Industrial 12.1% Residential 57.4% Commercial 30.5% Solid Waste Disposal (tons/year) Industrial7.7% Residential 11,688 Commercial 3,900 Industrial 1,308 Total 16,896 Commercial 23.31°/ Residential 69.2° Solid Waste Diversion (tons/year) Current diversion rate = 19.5% Residential 370 Commercial 2,492 Industrial 1,236 Total 4,098 Note: Totals may not add up due to rounding 5 Industrial 30.2% Residentiai 9% Commercial 60.8% Printed on Recycled PaPec Figure 2 Waste Disposal Composition City of Hermosa Beach Residential Other Wastes 1.9% Other Organics 17.4% Yard Waste 47.4% Plastics 7.1% Glass 5.1% Metals 2.2% Commercial Other Wastes 0.3% Other Organics 18.4% Yard Waste 1.6% Metals 14.6% Glass 6.2% Plastics 7.3% Paper51.6% Industrial Other Wastes 12.9% Other Organics 29.9% Metals 0.9% Glass 12.3% Note: Totals may not add to 100% due to rounding Mac 2-H02.01.01 3 Pie LO Plastics 11.3% a. C EXECUTIVE SUMMARY appliances, furniture, and household item donation, the use of diaper services, and backyard composting. Total diversion as a result of identified source reduction activities is 61 tons per year, or 1.5% of the existing diversion in the City. Four broad categories of source reduction activities are examined and evaluated. These categories are: 1) rate structure modifications; 2) economic incentives; 3) technical assistance and promotion; and 4) regulatory programs. The alternatives selected for implementation are shown in Table 1. Source reduction programs will result in 3.0% diversion of the generated waste stream by 1995, and 8.7% by 2000. These programs do not require any major new or expanded facilities. The effectiveness of these programs is tied directly to the education and public information activities undertaken by the City. RECYCLING COMPONENT Recycling activities within the City include a curbside recycling program, mulching of yard waste for use on City greenbelts, a City Hall office paper recycling program, and recycling by major businesses. The City currently diverts approximately 4,037 tons per year through recycling. This represents 98.5% of the existing diversion in the City. To further increase recycling in Hermosa Beach, a number of new programs will be implemented and existing programs expanded. New programs include at -source separation, collection, and processing where feasible, of recyclables at Hermosa Beach businesses. The City will also investigate the feasibility of siting a MRF in conjunction with other cities. These programs are summarized in Table 1. Details on program funding are included in Section 9. These programs will be implemented in the short term and continued through the medium term. .H020101 \HE RMOSA\EXSUM.DOC:VCsbz 4 nev.0 5/4/92 Printed on Pecyc1ed Paper EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1 Alternatives Selected for Implementation Program Expected Diversion Short Term Medium Term (%) (%) Source Reduction • Quantity -Based Local User Fee • Educational Efforts • Assistance with On -Site Composting • Incentives for Land Use Practices • Waste Evaluations and Technical Assistance • Nonprocurement Activities, Demonstration Program, Procurement Ordinance • Required Waste Reduction Planning Total Recycling • Curbside Collection • • At -Source Separation and Collection • Multifamily Collection Total Composting • Self -Haul Drop-off • Decentralized Preprocessing and Materials Storage • Yard Waste Composting • Promotion and Education • Financial Incentives • Regulatory Measures and Policies Total Special Waste • Used Tire Program • Construction/Demolition Waste Program • White Goods Program Total N/A 0.2 2.2 0.2 0.3 N/A N/A 3.0 2.8 2.5 1.3 6.6 (1) 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.2 5.2 0.8 0.3 N/A 1.3 8.7 2.8 10.2 2.0 15.1 (1) 8.5 <0.1 2.3 <0.1 2.3 (1) Itemized expected diversion rates are not available. 1020101\HE RMOSA\EXSUM.DOC:VCsbz 12- 5 Rev.O S14/92 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table 1 (continued) Alternatives Selected for Implementation Expected Diversion Program Short Term Medium Temi (%) (%) Education and Public Information • Residential Program - Promotional Campaign - Education and Information Program • Nonresidential Program - Promotional Campaign - Education and Information Program - Representative Waste Evaluation - SRRE Representative Training Program • School Program - Curricula Development (1) (1) Total Annual Diversion 14.5% 34.6% With 19.5%0. Existing Diversion 34.0% 54.1% (1) No diversion rates are anticipated for educational programs. COMPOSTING COMPONENT Composting can play a key role in the City's integrated waste management system. Yard waste and readily decomposable material make up a significant portion of the total waste stream. The City has targeted yard waste for ongoing composting programs: Yard waste includes grass, leaves, and prunings. The composting program will be implemented in the short term and continue through the medium term. This program will contribute an additional 4.9% diversion in the short term and 8.5% diversion over the medium term. Costs associated with the program are presented in Section 9. SPECIAL WASTE COMPONENT Special waste includes difficult to handle materials such as tires, construction debris, white goods, sofas, and mattresses; and potentially H020101,HE R MOSA\EXSUM.DOC:VCsbz 1? 6 Rev.0 5/4/97 Pnnfed on Recycled Paper • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY hazardous wastes such as sewage sludge, asbestos, auto bodies, or ash. The special waste addressed in this component includes bulky items such as white goods and tires, and inert solids such as demolition and construction waste. Three alternatives were evaluated and selected for implementation. Alternative 1 is a used tire program, Alternative 2 focuses on diverting construction and demolition waste in the private sector through new regulatory programs, and Alternative 3 is a white goods recovery program. Implementation of these three alternatives will be in the medium term and will divert 523 tons or 2.3% of the medium term waste generation. The expected diversion from each program is presented in Table 1. EDUCATION AND PUBLIC INFORMATION COMPONENT:. Based on the generators and targeted materials, a number of new programs are selected for implementation that target the residential sector, nonresidential sector, and schools. As shown in Table 1, two programs are recommended for the residential sector, four programs for the commercial .industrial sector, and one for the schools. All programs will- be implemented within the short-term planning period and continue into the medium-term. Costs associated with implementation of the education and public information program are presented in Section 9. DISPOSAL FACILITY CAPACITY COMPONENT Integrated waste management includes the environmentally safe disposal of solid waste that cannot be easily diverted from landfills. The --City does not have its own landfill. All waste is exported for disposal at various landfills in Los Angeles County. The City currently has no plans to establish disposal facilities within the City. However, there are private sector plans to export waste to new landfill sites in remote areas of the State. FUNDING COMPONENT The funding component demonstrates that the City has the ability to generate funds and allocate resources to plan, develop, and implement the various programs identified in this document. All current refuse collection and disposal activities are funded through the General Fund. I10201O1\HERMOSA\EXSUM.DOC:VCsbz 7 Rev. 0 5r4/92 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The costs for implementing this SRR element are summarized in Table 2. The implementation of the various component programs will require a capital expenditure of $96,600. Major capital expenditures include implementation of various collection programs and startup of education and public information programs. The costs presented include known costs to be incurred by the private sector for the identified programs. Table 2 Source Reduction and Recycling Element Implementation Costs Component .Capital Costs ($) Annual . Costs (s) Source Reduction 36,100 27,500 Recycling 25,000 189,500 Composting 0 27,500 Special Waste 5,000 3,500 Education and Public Information 30,500 17,500 Total $96,600 $265,500 The annual cost for all component programs will be $265,500. There are no dedicated solid waste positions at this time. The City will require one full-time employee in the short term to carry out component programs. INTEGRATION COMPONENT This section provides a summary of the solid waste management practices, proposed in this Source Reduction and Recycling element. It includes explanations of how the programs work together to maximize the feasibility of source reduction, recycling, and composting options and jointly achieve the diversion mandates. Consistent with the State's integrated waste management hierarchy, the City will promote source reduction activities targeted at decreasing the amount of solid waste being generated. For those wastes that continue to be generated, recycling and composting programs will divert waste from disposal. If a waste cannot be diverted, the City will insure that it is landfilled in an environmentally safe manner. The combination of component programs will divert an additional 14.5% of solid waste in the short term and 34.6% in the medium term. These figures, combined with the existing diversion rate of 19.5%, equal 34.0% H020101\HERMOSA\EXSUM.DOC:VCsbz 8 Rev.0 5/4/92 Punted on Pec, c/ed Paper EXECUTIVE SUMMARY diversion in the short term and 54.1% diversion in the medium term. This diversion, when realized by 2000, will meet the State -mandated goal of 50%. HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT Household hazardous wastes are any household discarded materials that. may threaten human health or the environment if disposed improperly. Potential hazards are found in materials that are toxic, flammable, corrosive, or reactive. Several alternativeswere selected for the City's household hazardous waste program. The City will continue to participate in the periodic roundup events sponsored by the Los Angeles County Sanitation District (CSD) and Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (DPW) until the permanent County program is in place. The City will also participate in the permanent County program, which will use mobile collection facilities for regularly scheduled collection events. The load checking programs will continue at all CSD landfills. The County's HHW recycling program will recycle wastes for which available markets exist. The current County public education program will be augmented by City -specific programs. There is no capital investment by the City for participation in the County program. The County will completely fund the permanent program and recover costs through a surcharge on the fees at all landfills in the County. H020101 \HE RMOSA\EXSUM.DOC:VCsbz /L 9 Rev.O SF4/92. r. :r; Table 9-1 SRRE Planning, Development and Implementation Costs Program Public Private 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Funding Source' Source Reduction • Quantity -Based Local Usor Foos(1)(2) X 0 0 0 0 25,000 GF • On -Site Composting(3) X 0 0 0 0 8,600 GF • Educational Efforts(4) X 0 -- -- -- -- GF • Demonstration Site(5) X 0 0 2,500 -- -- GF 1 • Monitoring and Evaluation and Waste Audits(6) X 0 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500 GF • Administration, Program Development(7)(8) X 0 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 GF Subtotals 0 27,500 30,000 27,500 61,100 Recycling • Curbside Collection(9) X -- 104,000 104,000 104,000 104,000 • Multifamily Collection (10) X -- 58,000 58,000 58,000 58,000 • Material Recovery Operations(11) X 0 0 0 25,000 GF • Monitoring and Evaluation and Waste Audits(6)(12) X 0 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500 GF • Administration, Program Developement(7)(8) X 0 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 GF Subtotals(13) 0 189,500 189,500 214,500 189,500 Composting • Monitoring and Evaluation and Waste Audits(6) X 0 0 13,500 13,500 13,500 GF • Administration, Program Development(7)(8) X 0 0 14,000 .14,000 14,000 GF Subtotals 0 0 27,500 27,500 27,500 (1) Assumes outside consultant and competitive bidding for services; there may be additional costs to the private sector that may include capital outlays for bags, bins, trucks, etc. (2) Additional costs will be considered in design study and al This time aro unknown. (3) Assumes City spends $1,000 on mutcher; and provides $5/compos) bin subsidy 10 15% of households. (4) Costs are included under Education and Public Information below. (5) Outside assistance to prepare site (estimate). (6) Monitoring and evaluation based on $70,000 per stall year including benefits and overhead, and Islall-person at 5% FTE. Estimated cost for waste audits is $10,000. This represents one third of full cost apportioned over three action components. (7) Based on $70,000 per stall year including benefits and overhead, 1 stall, 20% FTE. (8) All programs not specified are included under this lunding source for public sector costs only. (9) Cubside collection costs $1.17/month for 7,403 single-family homes and multifamily residents with less Than six units. Public sector costs are included in Administration, Program Development. (10) Multifamily collection costs $1.78/unil/month for 2,705 multifamily units (more than six units). EXCEL\H020101\HERMOSA.XLS:VCeeb 1 7 1 I (11) Consulting contract competitively bid. (12) Monitoring and evaluation for special wastes are included in this lunding source. (13) Tho sub -total Includes all of the costs listed above. Any revenues received from recycling programs are not subtracted. 1 I I ( I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Table 9-1 (continued) SRRE Planning, Development and Implementation Costs Program Public Private 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Funding Source' Special Waste • Used Tire Program(14) X 0 0 0 0 0 • Construction and Demolition Waste(15)(16) X 0 0 0 0 0 • White Goods Program(17) X • 0 0 0 0 0 I Subtotals 0 0 0' 0 0 Education, and Public Informatlon(18) • Residential Sector Promotional Campaign X 0 6,100 -- -- -- GF • Residential Sector Education and Information X 0 3,050 -- -- -- GF • School Curricula Development X 0 0 1,525 -- -- GF • Nonresidential Promotional Campaign X 0 0 6,100 -- -- GF • Nonresidential Public Information X .. 0 6,100 -- -- - GF • Representative Waste Evaluation . X 0 0 3,050 -- -- GF • SRRE Representative Training X 0 0 4,575 -- -- GF • Monitoring and Evaluation(19)(20) X 0 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 GF • Administration, Program Development(7) X 0 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 GF Subtotals 0 32,750 32,750 17,500 17,500 Total Program Costs -- 249,750 279,750 287,000 295,600 Annual Costs-- 234,500 262,000 . 262,000 262,000 Capital/Startup Costs -- 15,250 17,750 25,000 33,600 Known Public Costs -- 87,750 117,750 125,000 133,600 Known Private Costs -- '162,000 162,000 162,000 162,000 (7) Based on $70,000 per stall year including benefits and overhead, 1 stall, 20% FTE. (14) Public costs included in Education and Public Inlormation below. Private costs are unknown at this lime. (15) One time public capital cost of $5,000 for developing permit process. (16) Costs to the private sector include $6.801on for processing 29 tons/year of inert solids. (17) Costs may very depending upon agreement with hauler. (18) Cumulative capital cost derived by multiplying $0.30 times 10.108 households times 10 years. Includes brochures, . advertising, etc. Costs for each alternative are estimated by taking the Iollowing percentages of the cumulative cost: alternative 1, (20%); alternative 2, (10%); alternative 3, (5%); alternative 4, (20%), alternative 5, (20%), allornalivo 6, (10'/..), alternative 7, (15%). All annual costs aro included under Administration. Program Development. (19) Based on $70,000 per stall person including benefits and overhead, and 1 stall. 5% FTE. (20) Household hazardous waste program 'monitoring and evaluation is included in this funding source. EXCEL\H020101\HERMOSA.XLS:VCoeb GF = General Fund •= Only public funding sources are listed = Costs are unknown at this time SOURCE REDUCTION COMPONENT 3.5.3 Identification of Costs and Revenues This section discusses the known implementation costs, revenues, and revenue sources necessary for implementation of the source reduction program. Cost data are summarized in Table 3-8. Table 3-8 Source Reduction Implementation Costs Alternative Capital Costs ($) Annual Costs ($) Specific Implementation Costs 2 - Quantity -Based Local User Fee 25,000(1) — 8 - On -Site Composting 8,600(2) — 10 - Educational Efforts (3) — 13 - Demonstration Programs 2,500(4 — General implementation Costs Networking, Administration Development (Alternative — 14,000(5) 7,8,9,10,12,13,14,&15) Monitoring and Evaluation Costs — Monitoring and Evaluation 3,500(6) Waste Audits, etc. 10,0000 Total $36,100 $27,500 (1) Assumes outside consultant and competitive bidding for services, there may be additional costs to the private sector that may involve capital outlay for bags, bins, trucks, etc. Will be considered in design study. (2) Assumes City spends $1,000 on mulcher; and provides $5/compost bin subsidy to 15% of households. (3) See Section 7, Education and Public Information Component, for cost data. (4) Outside assistance to prepare site (estimate). (5) Based on $70,000 per staff year including benefits and overhead. 1 staff at 20% time equals 20% FTE. (6) Based on $70,000 per staff year including benefits and overhead. 1 staff at 5% time equals 5% FTE. (7) Estimated cost for waste audits is 510,000. This represents one third of full cost apportioned over three action components. H020101 HERUOSA\SOURCE 3-23 R.v. 1 711191 • _ ^leo cr -e'cvc eo Paper RECYCLING COMPONENT Table 4-8 Recycling Implementation Costs Alternative Initial Costs ($) Annual Costs ($) Specific implementation Costs - 1- Curbside Collection 104,000(1) 5- Multifamily Collection 58,000(2) 6-7 Material Recovery Operations 25,000(3) General Implementation Costs - Program development, administration, networking, and management 14,000(4) (Alternatives 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 23) Monitoring and Evaluation Costs - Monitoring and evaluation 3,500(5) Waste audits, etc. 10,000(6) Total 25,000 189,500 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Cost for curbside is 51.17/month for 7,403 single-family homes and multifamily residents with <6 units. Cost for Multifamily collection is $1.78/unit/month for 2.705 multifamily units (>6 units) Consulting contract competitively bid. Based on $70,000 per staff year including benefits and overhead. and 1 staff person at 20% FTE. Based on $70,000 per staff year including benefits and overhead. and 1 staff person at 5% FTE. Estimated cost for waste audits is $10,000. This represents one third of full cost apportioned over three action components. 4.6 MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF PROGRAMS r 4.6.1 Monitoring Methods for Objectives The following methods will be used to quantify 'and monitor achievement of the objectives: • Require the hauler to keep records of the amount of waste disposed by residents and businesses. H020101 Werrnosa\Recycle 4-22 Aev 1 •5f792 C MO COMPOSTING COMPONENT Table 5-7 Composting Implementation Costs Alternative Capital Costs ($) Annual Costs ($) Specific Implementation Costs 2 -Self -Haul Drop-Off(1) 0 3 -Decentralized Processing(2) 0 5 -Composting Facility (3) 0 General Implementation Costs Program Development, Administration, Networking, and Management (Altematives 7, 8 and 9) 14,000(4) Monitoring and Evaluation 0 Monitoring and Evaluation 3,500(5) Waste Audits, etc. 10,000(6) Total $0 $27,500. Assumes private facility. If public facility, costs may range from $5 to $15 per ton. Assumes private facility. If public facility, costs may range from $15 to $25 per ton. Assumes one or more privately developed regional facilities. 'tipping costs range from $25 to $50 per ton. Based on 20% of one staff year at 570,000 per staff year including salary and benefit. Based on 5% of one staff year at 570,000 per staff year including salary and benefits. Estimated cost for waste audits is 510,000 or one third of the full cost apportioned over three action components. 5.6 MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF PROGRAMS 5.6.1 Monitoring Methods for Objectives The following are the methods to be used to quantify and monitor the achievement of the various composting programs' objectives, including diversion from landfills and transformation facilities and reduction of hazards. • Require the hauler to keep records of the amount of waste disposed by residents and businesses. H020101 \Hermosa \Compost 5-19 Rev. 1 4/24/92 pnnte0 on Recycled Paper SPECIAL WASTE COMPONENT Table 6-3 Special Waste Program Implementation Cost (Medium Term) Alternative Capital Costs ($) Annual Costs ($) 1 -Used Tire Program (1) 0 2 -Construction and Demolition Waste Program 5,000(2) 3 -White Goods Program 3,500(3) (4) Total $5,000 $3,500 (1) Costs included in Education and Public Information Component (Section 7) (2) One time cost for developing permit process. (3) Costs based on $6.80/ton recycling charge for 504 tons of inert solids (4) Costs may vary depending upon agreement with hauler. 6.6 MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF PROGRAMS To effectively monitor the success of the programs, several tasks should be performed: • Record total tonnage by material recycled by the tire, construction and demolition, and white goods programs. • Tabulate the amount of inert solids reported by private contractors as being recycled from construction and demolition programs. • Monitor markets where special wastes are being diverted to verify amount of recycling. The City will evaluate the effectiveness of the special waste program by the following criterion: • Compare tonnage being recovered through the new programs with the current baseline. Quantities should increase, unless documented source reduction efforts result in decreasein quantity being generated. H020101\HERMOSA\SPW.DOC:VCsbz 6-1 1 Rev. 1 5/4/92° • Prated on Recycled Paper EDUCATION AND PUBLIC INFORMATION Table 7-3 Education and Public Information Implementation Costs (1) Based on $70,000 per staff person including benefits and overhead, and 1 staff at 20% FTE. (2) Based on $70,000 per staff person including benefits and overhead, and 1.staff at 5% FTE. (3) Cumulative capital cost derived by multiplying $0.30 times 10,108 households times 10 years. Includes brochures, advertising, etc. Costs for each alternative are estimated by taking the following percentages of the cumulative cost: alternative 1. (20%); alternative 2, (10%); alternative 3, (5%); alternative 4, (20%), alternative 5, (20%), alternative 6, (10%), alternative 7, (15%). F320101 W ERMOSANEP IC 7-11 Rev. 31 427/92 =-Ited on Fez) -'ed Paper . Capital Annual Alternative Costs ($) Costs ($) 1- Residential sector promotional campaign 6,100 2 - Residential sector education and information program 3,050 3 - School curricula development 1,525 4 - Nonresidential promotional campaign 6,100 r 5 - Nonresidential public information program .. 6,100 6 - Case study waste evaluation 3,050 7 - SRR element representative training program 4,575 Administration and Program Development 0 14,000(1) Monitoring and Evaluation .. 0z 3,500 ) Total 30,500(3) 17,500 (1) Based on $70,000 per staff person including benefits and overhead, and 1 staff at 20% FTE. (2) Based on $70,000 per staff person including benefits and overhead, and 1.staff at 5% FTE. (3) Cumulative capital cost derived by multiplying $0.30 times 10,108 households times 10 years. Includes brochures, advertising, etc. Costs for each alternative are estimated by taking the following percentages of the cumulative cost: alternative 1. (20%); alternative 2, (10%); alternative 3, (5%); alternative 4, (20%), alternative 5, (20%), alternative 6, (10%), alternative 7, (15%). F320101 W ERMOSANEP IC 7-11 Rev. 31 427/92 =-Ited on Fez) -'ed Paper . CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION J Lam 1 Emcon t -J Printed on , ecycied Paper 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF PLAN The City of Hermosa Beach's Source Reduction and Recycling (SRR) element was developed in response to Assembly Bill 939, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939). AB 939 requires every City and County in the State of California to prepare a SRR element that identifies how each jurisdiction willmaximize the diversion of waste away from landfilling and meet the minimum mandatory waste diversion goals set by the State of 25% by 1995 and 50% by 2000. This SRR element identifies how the City of Hermosa Beach will achieve these goals in the short-term (ST = 1991 to 1995) and medium-term (MT = 1996 to 2000) planning periods. Upon review and adoption of this plan by the City of Hermosa Beach, the SRR element will be submitted to Los Angeles County (County) for incorporation into the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan (CIWMP). This SRR element is consistent with Public Resources Code Section 40000 et seq., and the draft regulations developed by the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) entitled "Planning Guidelines for Preparing, Revising and Amending Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plans" dated December 5, 1990. These draft regulations amended the emergency regulations that were in effect during the development of this SRR element. The emergency regulations are found in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Chapter 9. The Preliminary SRR element was reviewed by the CIWMB and by the Los Angeles Local Task Force. Comments and responses can be found in Appendix G. 1.2 COMMUNITY PROFILE Hermosa Beach is a 1.3 square -mile beachside community. It is located on the southern end of Santa Monica Bay, 45 minutes from downtown Los Angeles and 10 minutes from Los Angeles International Airport. It is bordered by the Pacific Ocean and the Cities of Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach. According to the California Department of .Finance, 19,673 people reside in this densely populated community. There are H020101\HERMOSA\INTRO.DOC:VCsbz 1 -1 Rev. 0 5/4/92 Printed on Paper INTRODUCTION 10,1-08 housing units in the City, of which' 49 are mobile homes, 4,871 are single-family homes, and 5,188 are multifamily units. Hermosa Beach is considered a residential city, with 74% of the land used for housing. The median home value in Hermosa Beach is $453,360 and the average family income is $50,826. Additional details on the City's demographics is presented in Figure 1-1. 1.3 CURRENT SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Commercial, industrial, and residential solid waste generated in the City is collected and disposed by Browning -Ferns Industries (BFI), the City's franchised waste hauler. BFI uses Action Transfer and SWT Transfer stations and the Puente Hills landfill. The County of Los Angeles Department of Beaches and Harbors is responsible for collecting waste from the public beaches in Hermosa Beach. The County .uses the American Disposal in Gardena for disposal. Hermosa Beach residents have the opportunity to recycle materials through the new residential curbside and multifamily recycling program operated by BFI. This program was started June 3, 1991. Bins are provided and newspapers, junk mail, aluminum cans, •glass, plastic, and steel cans are collected at the curb. The local school operates periodic recycling roundups. The City also mulches yard waste for use on City greenbelts. City Hall employees recycle paper in the paper recycling program. Additional information on the City of Hermosa Beach's existing integrated waste management system is presented in Figure 1-2. 1.4 . INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM GOALS The City of Hermosa Beach is committed to integrated waste management planning. It is an active member of the South Bay Integrated Waste Management Joint Powers Authority (JPA) which was formed to address the mandates of AB 939. The JPA consist of the Cities of Gardena, Hawthorne, Lawndale, Lomita, and Manhattan Beach as well as a representative for the unincorporated portions of Los Angeles County located in the South Bay area. The City has identified the following goals related to integrated waste management. H020101\HERMOSA\INTRO.DOC:VCsbz 1-2 Rev. 0 5/4/92 INTRODUCTION • To implement low cost waste management programs with funds for these programs to be provided by waste generators through refuse rates. • The City will act as a facilitator to work with the private sector on integrated waste management issues. • The City will take an active role in setting and example for waste diversion by setting up our own recycling, composting, and source reduction programs. • To encourage the private sector tocontribute to waste diversion by voluntary efforts, and, if need be, by mandatory measures. • To design new waste management programs for operation by the franchised refuse hauler. • To cooperate with surrounding cities to deal with waste management issues. These goals and objectives represent Hermosa Beach's commitment to integrated waste management. Specific objectives for each component of.. this SRR element are included in subsequent sections of this document. H020101\HERMOSA\INTRO.DOC:VCsbz 1-3 Rev. 0 5/4/9 Printed on ='cycled Pape? Figure 1-1 Community Profile City of Hermosa Beach 2-4 Units 24.6% Housing * Mobile Homes 0.5% Single -Family 48.2% 5+ Units 26.7% • California State Department of Finance Population Ethnic Breakdown Black Asian 1.1% 2.8% Caucasian 90% Median Age 29.9 Years Information from 1980 Census, City's Local Conditions Survey Mae 4. F32.01.01 Industrial 1.4% Commercial 13.2% Land Use • Open Space 11.3% Residential 74.1% • Hermosa Beach Planning Department Economy Median Home Value Average Family Income (1986) Local Conditions Survey Number of Businesses Licensed in the City (Business Licensing Department, 1991) $453,360 $50,826 1,747' 'Includes home occupation • Solid Waste Disposal ) 1 1 j 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 J J Figure 1-2 Existing Integrated Waste Management System City of Hermosa Beach y Solid Waste Collection r Residential Service 100% Franchised Hauler Commercial / Industrial Service 100% Franchised Hauler Landfill Puente Hills Landfill Transfer Stations Action Transfer Station SWT Transfer Station Solid Waste Diversion WC: ►mol c1 Active Programs Curbside Recycling Program City Greenbelt Mulching Program City Hall Paper Recycling Reverse Vending Machine Pdntea c,,=acvcfed PAM' 1N1 INTRODUCTION 1.5 EVALUATION CRITERIA The criteria that will be used in Section 3, 4, 5, and 6 to evaluate alternative source reduction, recycling, composting, and special waste programs for the City have been compiled from the California Integrated Waste Management Board's Planning Guidelines and from needs presented by the various components. All criteria have been assigned a scale of high, medium, and low. A high score indicates favorable (or positive) conditions and a low score indicate unfavorable (or negative) conditions. The following ten criteria used for evaluation correspond to those specified in the regulations; the second set of criteria provide additional evaluation mechanisms which were not specifically required by the regulations. Regulatory Criteria • Effectiveness in reducing waste quantity • Absence of hazards Flexibility • Limited shift in waste type generation • Implementability Facility needs • Consistency with local policies • Absence of institutional barriers • Estimated cost rating (short term) • Estimated cost rating (medium term) • End uses Additional Criteria • Ease of financing • Technical reliability • Equipment and personnel availability • System compatibility • .Public acceptability H020101 \H E RMOSA\INTRO. DOC: VCsbz 1-6 Rev. 0 5/4/92 J 2r INTRODUCTION • Private acceptability • Private sector participation These criteria, and the evaluation mechanism are described in detail in Appendix A. 1.6 ORGANIZATION OF THE SRR ELEMENT In accordance with the regulations implementing AB 939, this document presents each component of the SRR element as listed in the following table. Reference to the applicable section number in the regulations is also provided. Table 1-1 SRR Element Organization SRR Element Section Regulatory Reference 1- Introduction 2- Solid Waste Generation Study and Analysis 3 Source Reduction Component 4- Recycling Component 5- Composting Component 6- Special Waste Component 7- Education and Public Information Component 8- Disposal Facility Capacity Component 9- Funding Component 10- Integration Component Article 6.2, Section 18731 Article 6.1, Sections 18722 and 18274 Article 6.2, Section 18732 Article 6.2, Sections 18733 and 18734 Article 6.2, Sections 18733 and 18735 Article 6.2. Sections 18733 and 18736 Article 6.2, Sections 18733 and 18737 Article 6.2, Section 18740 Article 6.2, Section 18744 Article 6.2, Section 18746 Article 6.2, Section 18748 • California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 9, "Planning Guidelines and Procedures for Preparing and Revising Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plans". H020101 \H ERMOSA\I NTRO. DOC:VCsbz 1-7 Rev. 0 5/4/92 Printed on FecvUed Paper. INTRODUCTION That organization of topics within each component generally follows the format presented below. The format deviates slightly between sections, however, as applicable to each respective component. • Introduction • Objectives • Existing Conditions • Program Alternatives • Program Selection Program Implementation • Monitoring and Evaluation 1.7 METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINING STAFFING LEVELS The staffing required to implement an integrated solid waste management program is dependent primarily on two factors: the population being served, and the existing diversion rate. Population is a measure . of the waste being generated, and the amount of training and education required. The existing diversion rate is a measure of the number of new programs that will have to be implemented to achieve the mandated diversion rates of 25% by 1995 and 50% by 2000. Table 1-2 shows the number of staff needed to support the level of effort necessary to meet the goals of the program. Table 1-2 Program Staffing Levels City Population Diversion Rate 0 - 50,000 50 - 100,000 100,000+ 0 - 15% 15 - 30% 30 - 40% >40% 2 1 3 4 1 2 1 2 1 1 H020101\HERMOSA\INTRO.DOC:VCsbz 1 -8 3� Rev. 0.5/4/92 J 1 7 7 7 7 1 J J 1 33 INTRODUCTION 1.8 JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY The City of Hermosa Beach joined with five other South Bay cities, Los Angeles County, and the County Sanitation District of Los Angeles County to achieve cost savings and to ensure a regional approach to solving solid waste management issues. Individual Source Reduction and Recycling Elements (SRRE) were prepared for each city, Gardena, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Lawndale, Lomita, and Manhattan Beach, as well as for the unincorporated areas of the county contiguous to the South Bay area. The cities formed a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) for the purpose of selecting a consultant to undertake the preparation of the SRRE and a separate Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) for each city and the county. Originally, the JPA was to include a number of other South Bay cities, El Segundo, Palos Verdes, Palos Verdes Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills, and Torrance, but those cities elected to proceed independent of the JPA. F1020101\HERMOSA\INTRO.DOC:VCsbz 1-9 Rev. 0 5/4/92 nnreo on ^ecvcled Paver 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CAL'ENDARFOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1(f) and (j) were heard at this time, but are shown in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. DISCUSSION OF PRELIMINARY DRAFTS OF CITY'S SOURCE REDUC- TION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT RESULTING FROM AB 939. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated November :18, 1991. Building and Safety Director Grove presented the .staff report and responded to Council questions. David Polis of Emcon Associates and Michael Huls of Resource Integration Systems gave a slide presentation regarding the State's requirements for solid waste source reduction and responded to Council questions. The public hearing was opened at 9:40 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: • Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh'Street, expressed concern that the costs were too high. The public hearing was closed at 9:43 P.M. Action: .Mayor Midstokke, with the consensus of the Council, directed that staff re-evaluate the program to come -up with a lower cost in order to comply,: as she thought the -City was close to compliance. now, thanks to the resident's desire to recycle. She also. directed staff to look at the funding source for a rate structure modification as an incentive and to obtain information from other cities to find the most cost effective method of compliance. Councilmember Edgerton suggested asking Browning Ferris to handle the volume computations rather than having the City do it alone. MUNICIPAL MATTERS - None 6. •MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND'REPORTS - CITY MANAGER Interim City Manager Wisniewski reported that the annual Holiday Tree lighting ceremony would take place on Tues- day, December 3, 1991 at 5:30 P.M. near Loreto Plaza. ('7 �/ City Council Minutes .11-.26-91 - Page 7639 f x /%1 Ds,4 /2_:q-)'4 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council BEACH DRIVE WALK Recommendation: l42;ril 6, 1993 Regular Meeting of April 13, 1993 STREET PARKING FEES That the City Council determine what the parking fee shall be for parking on public street right-of-way along the walk streets west of Beach Drive. Background: On March 23, 1993, the City council passed Ordinance No. 93-1084 which allows the parking of two cars on the public street right-of-way along the walk streets west of Beach Drive. This parking is allowed where the adjacent property owner applies for and is granted an encroachment permit that allows the parking to occur. - One of the conditions of approval is that a parking fee shall be paid. The amount of the parking fee is to be determined and set by City Council Resolution. The purpose of this City Council agenda item is to determine the amount of that fee. Analysis: The proposed parking fee would provide exclusive use of the parking spaces under consideration. The parking fee is to cover the thirty feet (30') depth of right-of-way adjacent to the west edge of Beach Drive. The width of the subject area is twenty two feet (22'), and is located between the concrete paved walk area along the center of the street right-of-way and the private property adjacent to the walk street right-of-way. The Ordinance would allow a maximum of two cars parked on this encroached area. The parking fee can be based on a number of different criteria and some of the existing fees charged within the City are as follows: Existing Parking Fee Monthly Equivalent Fee Per Space 1. The use of public street right-of-way for a commercial purpose is $.50 per square foot per month. The monthly fee per property for 10' x 20' parking space based on this Existing Parking Fee Monthly Equivalent Fee Per Space same rate would be as shown below: ($.50/sq. ft.)(10 ft. x 20 ft.) = $100 per space per month $100.00 2. The staff has been informed that parking spaces have been rented along Beach Drive for $90 per month. 3. Parking at a city parking lot is charged at the following rate of $1.25 per hour with a $12.00 per day maximum. The lots are open between the hours of 8 AM and 2 AM. $ 90.00 ($12.00)(365 day/yr.)/(12 mo./yr.) = $365.00 per month. $365.00 4. Parking at the parking meters without a residential parking permit would be charged at the rate of $0.50 per hour with a 3 hour maximum. The meters are checked between 9 AM and 8 PM everyday. No parking is allowed for 4 hours per week due to street sweeping. ($0.50)[(11 hr/day)(7 day/wk) (4 hr)](52 wk/yr)/(12 mo/yr) =$158.17 per month. 5. A daily parking permit for a non-resident costs $5.40 per day. ($5.40)(365 day/yr)/(12 mo/yr) = $164.25 per month. 6. A guest parking permit is $1.10 per day. ($1.10/day)(365 day/yr)(12 mo/yr) =$33.46 per month. 7. A contractor parking permit is $21.75 per month. 8. The parking fee for an annual residential parking permit in the impacted area near the beach is $27. This permit allows anyone within the beach area to park at a yellow post parking meter without paying the meter. $158.17 $164.25 $ 33.46 $ 21.75 Existing Parking Fee Monthly Equivalent Fee Per Space (Residents are not allowed to park at silver or green posted meters.) ($27.00/yr)/(12 mo/yr) = $2.25 per month. $ 2.25 9. A permit to be allowed to park in front of a driveway is a one time fee of $29.75. $ -0- Also attached is a copy of the residential parking permit instructions that are provided as a handout to the residents in the impacted area. Respectfully sub i'tted, Charles McDon-ld Noted: Mar Director of P blic Works Ac ng City Manager ty/ltfee CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT INSTRUCTIONS FINANCE DEPARTMENT, CASHIER DIVISION ROOM 101, CITY HALL, 1315 VALLEY DRIVE OFFICE -HOURS: MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY 7:00 AM - 6:00 PM PHONE (310) 318-0217 PERMIT LOCATION The permanent permit (sticker) is valid only for the vehicle license shown on the parking permit receipt. Affix the sticker (using only the self-adhesive on the sticker) to the lower, right-hand, inside corner of the front windshield. Do not laminate or use tape. Please remove previous stickers. The transferable permit must hang from the inside rear-view mirror; it is not valid on the dash or taped to the window. Please lock your vehicle when using transferrable permits. VALID AREAS Permits are valid in the "impacted area" of the City, defined as follows: bound by the north and south City boundaries; by the Pacific Ocean on the west; by Loma or Morningside Drive on the east. Permits allow parking at any YELLOW POSTED METER without paying the meter. The permit also exempts you from the one-hour restriction in the residential areas from May 15 - September 15 between 8:00 am - 5:00 pm. RESTRICTIONS NO VEHICLE MAY PARK IN EXCESS OF SEVENTY-TWO (72) HOURS in the same parking space (California Vehicle Code and H.B.M.C.) PERMITS ARE NOT VALID AT COMMERCIAL METERS. (Silver or Green Post) REPLACEMENT PERMITS If you change cars or break your windshield, bring the receipt, original sticker (peeled from window) and the registration for the vehicle on which you want the replacement sticker to Room 101 City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive. A replacement will be issued for $3.10. Please bring picture I.D. and a current utility bill as proof of residency. No replacement will be issued without the original sitcker and receipt. Transferrable permits cannot be replaced. If the permit is stolen, a new one may be purchased at the regular price with a copy of the original receipt and a police report. GUEST PERMITS One -day temporary guest permits are available to holders of a transferrable guest permit.. Permits may be used five times (days) per year with a maximum of twenty permits each time. The cost is $1.10 per permit up to five; permits six through twenty are free. PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY OR YOUR VEHICLE MAY BE SUBJECT TO CITATION- MARTIN SAPETTO A.I.A. ARCHITECT ARCHITECTURE -DEVELOPMENT-CONSTRUCTION - ENTITLEMENT GUILLERMO GARCIA DESIGN - CONSTRUCTION 9 3 6 HERMOSA AVE , SUITE 1 0 7; HER M O S A BEACH, CA 9 0 2 5 4 (3 1 0) 3 7 6- 0 4 3 5 FAX (3 1 0) 3 7 6- 0 0 6 5 3/24/93 Thomas P. Allen III 120 fisherman's Redondo Beach, CA. 90277 Re. Walk street right of way /(00 ' % He_ 7 lL AHD )-//2M fA . E 4 C l� Dear. Mr. Allen III As a property owner you are probably aware the Hermosa Beach City Council has adopted ,on 3/23/93, ordinance 93/1084 regulating the parking of vehicles ,and the private use of the public street right- of- way adjacent to walk streets corner Strand lots. The ordinance seeks to accomplish beautification of the Strand corridor and to resolve the parking issue Within the restrictions and conditions imposed by the ordinance , the ordinance allows adjacent property owners the private use (for a side yard) of a portion of all walk streets right - of- ways through the issuance of an encroachment permit. Parking (limited to two cars) will also be allowed through the issuance of a revocable encroachment permit. Other requirements include : * A minimum of 1/3 of the encroachment area shall be used for landscape. * The encroachment permit must be applied for within 60 days of the passage of this ordinance and the property owners must fulfill the terms of this permit within 120 days of the issuance of this permit. * Both the site development plan and the landscape plan for the encroachment area must be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of an encroachment permit. You ,the owner , will be responsible for obtaining and submitting plans for approval and implementing the required work We are an established Hermosa Beach Architectural and Construction firm with 15 years of local experience and would like to offer our services to help you conform to the new ordinance. Our services can include : 1 2 3 4 Assisting the Owner in obtaining a Certified Survey of your property and the adjacent right of way if one is not existing Drawing all required plans to obtain a permit Processing the plans and the required encroachment permit with the City of Hermosa Beach Construction of any improvements as per plan including Landscaping We will be happy to assist you with the complete package or with any part you might choose. Please call us to set up an appointment if we can be of assistance Sincerely; Martin Sapetto A.I.A. ao y March 24, 1993 City of 2lermosa Teaclt._ Thomas Allen 120 Fisherman's Wharf Redondo Beach, CA 90254 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Certified Return Receipt Requested (P 662 454 436) On March 23, 1993 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 93-1084 which will affect your interest in the City property adjacent to your property. The ordinance will allow the legal parking of your vehicles on the City property and a copy of the ordinance is enclosed for your information. The ordinance provides for the private use of the walk street outside of the center 16 foot wide paved area by the adjacent property owner through the use of an encroachment permit. Parking will also be allowed through the issuance of this same encroachment permit. Application for the permit must be made within 60 days of the passage date of the ordinance. Therefore, the latest date for application is May 23, 1993. The complete application must be submitted to the Public Works Department by the above date and shall include: 1. A site plan showing all improvements to be requested. 2. A landscaping plan showing all landscaping that is requested to be approved. 3. Payment of permit processing fees. Upon approval of the plans by the Planning Commission, the following actions need to be completed. 1. An insurance certificate in the amount of $500,000 must be provided showing the City as an additional insured. 2. The encroachment permit agreement must be signed in front of a notary. 3. The payment of all parking fees shall be paid. The encroachment permit will be then issued. All required improvements must be completed within 120 days. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Lynn Terry at 318-0212 or me at 318-0211 and we will be glad to help you. Director of Public Works 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE 93-1084 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE CITY CODE TO ALLOW VEHICLE PARKING ON PUBLIC STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE WALK STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF BEACH DRIVE WHEREAS, the City Council has endeavored to research, investigate, and review matters pertaining to the parking of vehicles on the public street right-of-way adjacent to residential properties along the walk streets on the west side of Beach Drive, and WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed numerous voluminous reports from staff, the Planning Commission, and a special City Council/Citizen Subcommittee created by the City Council, and WHEREAS, the City Council seeks to encourage and accomplish beautification of the Strand corridor and to resolve the parking of vehicles on the public street right-of-way along the walk streets on the west side of Beach Drive, and WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings: 1. The public street right-of-way along the walk streets, outside of the center 16 feet of paved walking area, adjacent to the private residential properties west of Beach Drive and east of the Strand have been historically used and maintained as side yards by the adjacent private properties; and 1 KUGLER SURVEYING & MAPPING 303 N. Placentia Avenue, Suite E, Fullerton, CA 92631 (714) 572-9146 • (310) 549-6000 • FAX (714) 572-0378 April 6, 1993 Dear Homeowner, Enclosed are excerpts from Hermosa City Ordinance No. 93-1084 which was adopted March 23, 1993 The effect of this ordinance is to require you to obtain an encroachment permit on the areas of the walk street that you currently use for your own purposes. The main thrust is to limit parking within this area to a maximum of 2 cars and to require landscaping and certain other restic- tions The application requires two documents to be submitted: First, a site development plan, showing existing conditions; that is, all physical features which lie in the area to be permitted. Second, a landscaping plan which will show the proposed changes to con- form to the ordinance. You may have already been contacted by Guillermo Garcia (374-9848),. who can provide the landscaping plan service and he may quote you a price for the site development plan also, which I will provide. I want to take this opportunity to add my caution to you on the time limit in this matter. The City has made no provision for filing after the 60 day time limit they set. If you file your application after 60 days, you will be too late. Kugler Surveying and Mapping will provide the surveying and mapping necessary for the site development plan to the City standards. Each property has its own characteristics, but I have walked the entire length of affected properties, taking notes, and when you contact me, I will be able to quote a price for our portion of the work. For your best interests, please contact me at [310] 549-6000 or Guillermo as soon as possible to arrange for the necessary work. Sincerely, KUGLER SURVEYING & MAPPING Clarke G. Kugler, Jr. a 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 , / t) ORDINANCE 93-1084 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE CITY CODE TO ALLOW VEHICLE PARKING ON PUBLIC STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE WALK STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF BEACH DRIVE WHEREAS, the City Council has endeavored to research, investigate, and review matters pertaining to the parking of vehicles on the public street right-of-way adjacent to residential properties along the walk streets on the west side of Beach Drive, and WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed numerous voluminous reports from staff, the Planning Commission, and a special City Council/Citizen Subcommittee created by the City Council, and WHEREAS, the City Council seeks to encourage and accomplish beautification of the Strand corridor and to resolve the parking of vehicles on the public street right-of-way along the walk streets on the west side of Beach Drive, and WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings: The public street right-of-way along the walk streets, outside of the center 16 feet of paved walking area, adjacent to the private residential properties west of Beach Drive and east of the Strand have been historically used and maintained as side yards by the adjacent private properties; and 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 RECTION 1. Section 29-38(2) is hereby amended to add the following subsections: e. The public street right-of-way along the walk streets on the west side of Beach Drive, outside of the center 16 foot wide paved walking area, may be used for private side yard use by the adjacent residential property owner through the use of an encroachment permit; f. The adjacent residential properties along the walk • streets, west of Beach Drive and east of the Strand, may be allowed to have approved parking of vehicles on the public street right-of-way if they apply for a revocable encroachment permit requesting that parking. The parking shall only be approved through the use of an encroachment permit and the permit shall be applied for within 60 days of the passage of this ordinance. Also, the adjacent property owner shall fulfill all the conditions of the encroachment permit within 120 days after the issuance of the permit; g. The special conditions for a residential encroachment permit, on the public street right-of-way area west of Beach Drive and east of the Strand, are as follows: 1. The adjacent residential property owner to whom the encroachment permit is granted shall purchase and maintain a public liability insurance policy applicable to the encroachment area with a policy limit of not less than $500,000.00. The City of 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Hermosa Beach shall be named and maintained as an "additional insured" in regard to the encroachment area. Such adjacent private property owner to whom the encroachment permit is granted shall at all times maintain on file with the City of Hermosa Beach current proof of such insurance coverage. 2. Parking shall be allowed only within a distance of 30 feet west of Beach Drive. A maximum of two cars shall be allowed within the approved parking area. Parking tags will be issued by the City. 3. A minimum of 1/3 of the encroachment area shall be landscaped and maintained by the adjacent residential property owner. 4. The required landscaping shall be in place within 120 days after the issuance of the encroachment permit. The subject encroachment area shall be kept neat, clean, and in good order. The landscaping and good order shall be maintained at all times by the adjacent residential property owner. 5. Where no parking is currently taking place, the landscaping shall be in place prior to the use of the encroachment area for any parking. Where parking is currently taking place, parking will be allowed to continue as long as the adjacent residential property owner has applied for an encroachment permit. 6. All landscaping shall be limited to a maximum height of 36 inches above the adjacent sidewalk level unless shown otherwise on the approved landscaping plan. 4 5 7. A permanent barrier shall be installed and 6 maintained between the approved parking area and the remainder of the encroachment area. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8. All vehicular access to the encroachment area shall be from Beach Drive only. 9. The parking permitted herein shall be limited to passenger vehicles only. Trucks (excepting non-commercial passenger type pick-ups),motorhomes, campers, boats, trailers, etc., are prohibited. 10. The parking of passenger vehicles permitted herein does not allow for the storage of disabled or unused vehicles. Parking of a passenger vehicle shall not exceed 72 continuous hours. 11. An adjacent property owner who applies for an encroachment permit as contemplated herein shall pay a permit fee to the City to cover the actual costs of processing the application and issuing the encroachment permit. 12. Both the site development plan and the landscaping plan for the encroachment area shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the - 6 - issuance of the encroachment permit by the Public Works Department. 13. All fence or wall heights within the encroachment area shall be limited to a maximum of 36 inches. 14. Parking fees shall be determined and set by City council Resolution. 15. The privilege of parking on public street right-of-way along the walk street on the west side of Beach Drive shall terminate upon violation of the Conditions within the encroachment permit. h. The commercial properties along Beach Drive are excluded from the conditions above which only apply to the residential properties along the walk streets. i. Properties that have existing garages fronting onto a walk street, as their only access, shall only be required to comply with those conditions as may be imposed by the Director of Public Works. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its adoption. SECTION 3. That the City Council does hereby designate the City Attorney to prepare a summary of this Ordinance to be published pursuant to the Government Code Section 36933(c) (1) in lieu of the full text of said Ordinance. That prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk { 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 23rd day of March , 1993 cAr' L/ PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: , CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: (1J ii __L V i;lv , CITY ATTORNEY ty/ordbeach 8 March 30, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Regular Meeting of April 13, 1993 VETERANS MEMORIAL CONCEPTUAL PLAN Recommendation It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and the Hermosa Beach Veterans Memorial Committee that Council approve the attached conceptual rendering for a Hermosa Beach Veterans Memorial. The location for the memorial is recommended to be on the sandy area of the Community Center lawn (southwest corner) adjacent to 1 lth Place. Background At the August 11, .1992 Council meeting, veteran and Hermosa Beach resident, Ken Marks, requested that the City support the concept of a memorial to be constructed in the City to honor Hermosa Beach veterans. Council supported this request and directed the Parks and Recreation Commission to work on an idea for the memorial (see attached minutes). The Commission established a subcommittee consisting of Commissioners Reviczky and Crecy who worked with a committee of volunteers to select the location and design for the memorial. Analysis Attached you will find the proposed design which was conceived by a team of volunteer architects/designers: Jim Antonias, Teri Slaven and Joyce Flood. They will be present at the meeting to provide additional input to the Council about their idea. The Commission approved this concept at their March 21, 1993 meeting. The committee of volunteers and the Commissioners are to be commended for their efforts to date. With the theme of "Veterans are Timeless" (selected to convey the spirit of honoring all veterans past, present and future with no particular deference to any war or branch of the military) they set out to obtain designs from volunteers for a memorial that would personify a sundial. The functionality of the dial would not be as important as its design features. The location selected would beautify a spot at the Community Center that has been blighted since the removal of playground equipment some time ago. There would be pagel 1'Q no substantial intrusion onto the green space of the lawn (the areas is currently covered with dirt) nor would it compete with existing or prospective activities at the Center (i.e., Concerts on the Green) It would also place the memorial in a beautiful setting that would be well traveled by Community Center users and passersby. Per Commission action at their March meeting, the committee will also request that Council allow space on the brick wall of the City Hall patio area for a commemorative marker placed to honor the volunteers and major donors to the memorial (similar to the one in place for the Greg Jarvis Memorial project). Once selected, the design will provide the cornerstone to the committee's fundraising efforts as there will be a vision to the project. With the anticipated project completion date of next Veterans Day, the sooner they can proceed with soliciting donations, the more realistic this goal becomes. Fiscal impact: No fiscal impact at this time. The volunteer committee will solicit dollars and in-kind donations from the community to support the project. It is anticipated that once the project is completed, the City will incur modest costs as the agency responsible for maintaining the grounds. Attachments: Conceptual Plan Council Minutes Commission Minutes Committee Member Roster Respectfully Submitted, Ma •r ' o ey Co unity Resources Director Concur: /_,L.,ve„uciL))4,,D Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager page2 HERMOSA BEACH VETERANS' MEMORIAL CONCEPTUAL SKETCH MARCH 1993 A (b) Action: To direct staff to bring back information to the Council concerning the discontinuance of retirement benefits for elected officials. Motion Midstokke, second Edgerton. The motion carried unanimously.. Letter from Ken Marks, Historian of AMVETS, dated August 4, 1992 regarding a plaque honoring Hermosa Beach veter- ans that gave their lives for our country. This item was combined with item 14 (e): Other Matters - City Council. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Ken Marks - 223 Valley Drive, AMVETS, Culver City Post #2, stated that as historian he would search Veteran's groups to try to ensure that all names were included, but the monument plaque was not large (estimated at 25 to 30 names) and would be such that additional names could be added if they were discovered at a later time; Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, asked that the Parks and Recreation Commission be sure to work with Mr. Marks; and, Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, suggested that a competition be held for the design of the monument. (c) To refer the matter to the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory .Commission for its recommendation to the Council; request that the Commis- sion work closely with Mr. Marks; and suggest a competi- tion for the design. Motion Edgerton, second indistinct. The motion carried unanimously. Memorandum from Planning Commission dated August 6, 1992 regarding live broadcasting of Planning Commission meetings. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, stated that he was upset with the way Multivision handled the matter; suggested that the Planning Commis- sion meetings be changed to Wednesdays as soon as it was legally possible;. and, he was not in favor of splitting the public access channel for Manhattan/Hermosa Beach; Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth -Street, Planning Com- missioner, stated that he was unable to respond for the Planning Commission as a whole, regard- ing changing the meeting days; the -Minutes Secretary had stated she was not available on Wednesdays; but, the entire Commission felt the City Council Minutes 08-11-92 Page 7901, PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF THURSDAY, MARCH 18, 1993 MEETING ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Blaco, Commissioners Crecy, McCurdy, Reviczky Absent: Commissioner Peirce Staff: Esslinger, Rooney APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 18, 1993 Motion: "To approve as submitted." Reviczky/McCurdy All Ayes VETERANS MEMORIAL CONCEPTUAL PLAN Motion: "To approve staff recommendation to accept in concept the design for a Veteran's Memorial to be located on the sand area of the Community Center lawn." McCurdy/Blaco All Ayes Motion: "To request permission to use the Honor Wall in the City Hall courtyard to acknowledge veteran's committee and sponsors with a plaque." Crecy/Reviczky All Ayes STREET HOCKEY FACILITY FEASIBILITY STUDY Motion: "For staff to estimate the cost of turning either the Kelly Courts or Valley Park into an interim roller hockey facility." Blaco/Reviczky All Ayes LEGENDS OF VOLLEYBALL Motion: "To approve request from Legends of Volleyball, Inc. to hold the 6 -man Legends pro volleyball tournament at the Pier Courts on September 12, 1993." Crecy/Blaco All Ayes BILTMORE SITE COMPETITION Motion: "To approve the concept of a college design competition (UCLA) for the Biltmore site park to be organized by volunteers from the R/UDAT public facilities subcommittee and if time allows that they be given consideration by the Commission as formal input during the master plan process for the park." Blaco/Reviczky All Ayes 1 HERMOSA BEACH. VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE NAME PHONE NUMBER BUZZ BOZZI 375-6002 WILL BUCHANAN 374-8861 STEVE CRECY 379-2316 MIKE FLAHERTY 379-4085 JOYCE FLOOD 374-2441 JUDY GARLAND 376-4270 TERRY AND CAROL HONEYCUTT 379-6974 KEN MARKS 376-3319 BOBBY NEWMAN 376-7549 AL NORRIS 372-9850 DENNIS O'DELL 824-4308 (W) TERI SLAVEN 379-5519 J. R. REVICZKY 379-6267 RYAN TUCKER 379-5117 DALLAS YOST 379-7991 1 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council a • C-41 A)/ April 1, 1993 Regular Meeting of April 13, 1993 SUBJECT: REVISED OIL AND GAS LEASE AGREEMENT AND MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) LOCATION: CITY YARD, 555 SIXTH STREET INITIATED BY STAFF PARTIES: WINDWARD ASSOCIATES (MACPHERSON OIL COMPANY), GLG ENERGY, INC. AND THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PURPOSE: 1. TO APPROVE THE REVISED LEASE AGREEMENT TO USE THE CITY YARD FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF OIL AND GAS WITHIN THE UPLANDS AND TIDELANDS 2. TO APPROVE THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE STATE LANDS COMMISSION Recommendation Approve the language of the revised lease agreement for drilling from the City Yard site into both the uplands and approve the MOU. Background In 1984, Proposition P was passed by the voters granting approval for oil production at the City Yard. In 1986 the City signed a base agreementgranting drilling rights to MacPherson oil Company into the uplands from the City Yard. The City receives a set percentage of the revenues from the oil program. Since then, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) examining the impacts, and mitigation thereof has been prepared and certified by the City Council, Resolution 90-5363, May 8, 1990. City Staff, along with the City Council Sub -committee, negotiated a lease agreement which was adopted January 14, 1992. The lease was submitted to the State Lands Commission for review and comment. changes. Analysis Revised Leased The State Land Commission has requested technical The changes to the lease agreement are technical do not alter any of the previous "deal points". were necessary to satisfy State Lands Commission in nature, and These changes . A comparison of the original language, and the revised language has been attached. The deal points have also been attached. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) The MOU is essentially an agreement between the State Lands Commission and the City. The highlights are as follows: 1. The City has complied with the bidding process requirements. 1A. There is drainage of tidelands oil from Hermosa Beach into Redondo beach (key factor in allowing City to extract tidelands oil). 2. The City will allow the State Lands Commission staff adequate time for review and advice of oil development plans prior to issuance of any permits. 3. The State Lands Commission agrees to the split in royalty revenues between the tidelands trust account, and the drill site account (7% drill site- account and 11 2/3% trust account). 4. The City agrees to use the trust funds authorized by applicable law. Listed below are examples of programs these funds may support: a. Beach maintenance b. Beach related police and security c. Pier repair and improvement d. Repair, maintenance, and improvement of access and service roads on and adjacent to the beach area e. Public landscaping and parkway repair and maintenance f. Reasonable costs and administration of trust fund programs including legal and consultant costs. g. City's costs in procuring, negotiating, and implementing the lease h. Other similar programs 5. The minimum royalty (section 2.b.(1) of lease) is to secure operator's timely performance. Operator's -funds .-for the royalty payment is limited to a maximum of $281,250 annually from the restricted funds. 6. The State Lands Commission will have access to all records related to operators performance, -and the City will make certain that records are properly maintained. 7. The City's intent under Section 13.d.(4) is to prorate the repayment of the advance from all sources of royalty revenue as received. City agrees that the repayment of the Advance, as provided in Section 13.d.(4), shall be prorated on the basis of a 70/30 allocation from City's receipts of royalty revenue from the tidelands and uplands, respectively, to the extent that such royalty revenues from each source are available. 8. The City shall request the State Lands Commission be an additional insured on the insurance coverage if premium does not increase. 9. The emergency trust fund will be funded 70% from revenues from the tidelands and 30% from uplands respectively, and when funds are released, per the lease, they will be deposited as they are attributable to the tidelands plus interest. 10. The State Lands Commission's amendments to the lease are agreed to by the City and operator. CONCUR: 7iLvr� Mie a-1 chub.' h rederick R. Perrin v Planning Director City Manager eLLJ ��v Casey Vose City Attorney Attachments 1. Memorandum of Understanding 2. Lease amendment 3. Amendment comparison chart 4. Deal points 5. Questions and answers on the oil drilling program p/ccsroill 3 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING by and between CITY OF:._EERMOSA BEACH and CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION This Memorandum of Understanding ("Memorandum") is entered into this day of 1993, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,- a California municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City") and the CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION, a commission of the State of California (hereinafter the "Commission"). This Memorandum is executed by the parties in reliance upon the following facts: A. Since September 21, 1985, the City has had on file before the Commission an application for approval of an oil and gas lease for the exploration and production of hydrocarbon products from the tidelands area owned by the City and held in trust (the "tidelands") H. In response to comments and direction from the Commission in December 1985, the City has subsequently reviewed and certified' an environmentalimpact report for and approved and executed that certain Oil and Gas Lease No. 2.. (hereinafter the "Lease") with Windward Associates and GLG Energy, L.P. (hereinafter together the "Operator") to, undertake the exploration and production of hydrocarbon products in both the tidelands and the uplands area within the jurisdiction of the City_ C. In response to further comments from the Commission regarding. the Lease, City and Commission desire to. enter into this Memorandum to set forth the understanding of each respective party for the. City's implementation of and performance under the Lease. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows; 1. The Commission has determined that there is drainage from the City tidelands and that the City has substantially complied with the bidding provisions as required under the California Public Resources Code:. Therefore, in accordance with Section 7061 of the Public Resources Code, the Commission hereby determines that it would be impractical to require the City to conduct further bidding procedures and hereby exempts the city and the Lease from further compliance., with Sections 7058.5 and 7059 of said Code. 2. City shall make available, in a timely manner, to the Commission all plans, specifications, reports, studies and other related documents, as required by City for subsequent permits to be issued by City for oil and gas exploration and production, prior to issuance of any such permit by City in order to provide Commission a fair opportunity for comment and advice. Such information shall include, but is not limited to, a hazard footprint and proposed conditions under a conditional use permit. 3. The Commission acknowledges that royalty revenue from the tidelands due and payable to the City under the Lease at eleven and two thirds percent (11 2/3%) to be deposited in a tidelands trust account is the same level of royalty revenue due and payable to the City of Los Angeles under the Hyperion lease. Therefore, the Commission hereby approves the allocation of royalty revenue between the tidelands trust account and the drill site account. 4. City shall establish a Special Tidelands Trust Fund for deposit of all royalty revenues resulting from the production of oil and gas from the tidelands. The City acknowledges that said funds can be used only for the promotion, protection, accommodation, establishment, improvement, operation and maintenance of public recreational beaches and coastline for the- benefit hebenefit of the public or as otherwise authorized by applicable law. The City agrees to use said trust funds for, but not limited to, such programs described as follows: a. Beach maintenance. b. Police and security related to the beacharea. c. Pier repair and improvement. d. Repair, maintenance and improvement of access and service roads on and adjacent to the beach area. e. Public landscaping and parkway repair and maintenance. f. Reasonable costs for administration of trust fund programs, including legal and consultant costs directly related thereto. g. Reimbursement of City's prorata costs reasonably related to procuring, negotiating and implementing the Lease as it relates to oil and gas from the tidelands. City further agrees to provide timely notice to Commission of the City's approval and implementation of such programs which use tidelands trust funds. 2. 5. The parties acknowledge and agree that the Minimum Royalty, as provided in Section 2.b.(1) of the Lease, is to secure Operator's timely performance of exploration and production of oil and gas in both the tidelands and the uplands. The Lease, in Section 2.b.(2), further limits Operator's source of funds for payment of the Minimum Royalty from restricted royalty to a maximum of $281,250 in each year. To the extent that the City receives payment of Minimum Royalty which is a direct result of production from the tidelands, City shall deposit all such revenue into its Special Tidelands Trust Fund. 6. The Commission shall have access to the records related to Operator's performance under the Lease through the City. Section 14 of the Lease provides that the City has the right to release information on the Operator to "any governmental agency - needing the data or information to regulate the leased lands or adjacent lands." The City has a vested interest in insuring the accuracy of these reports and will assiduously review and monitor the reports and records. The City shall fully cooperate in making relevant information available to Commission to allow. the Commission to carry out its mandated oversight duties. 7. The City's intent under Section 13.d.(4) is to prorate - the repayment of the_Advance from all sources of royalty revenue as received. City hereby agrees that the repayment of the Advance, as provided in -Section 13.d.(4), shall be prorated on the basis of a 70/30 allocation from City's receipts of royalty revenue from the tidelands and uplands, respectively, to the extent. that such royalty revenues from each source are available. This provision shall not be construed to alter or change the repayment obligation of the City to Operator to_apply 50% of all royalty revenue due to City to the Advance as provided therein. 8. The City shall request that Operator name the Commission as an additional insured on insurance coverage provided by Operator under the Lease provided such additional coverage does not increase Operator's insurance premiums -thereby. 9. The city shall fund its contribution to the Emergency Trust Fund under Section 18.d.(3) based upon a 70/30 allocation of royalty revenues received from the tidelands and- uplands, respectively. To the extent that funds are released from the Emergency Trust Fund in 'accordance with the terms of the Lease, City shall deposit into the Special Tidelands Trust Fund such released funds as are attributable to royalty revenue from the tidelands plus a prorata portion of interest accrued thereto. 3. 10. The parties acknowledge that certain amendments to the Lease will be or are agreed to between the City and Operator to address comments and concerns of the Commission. IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Memorandum of Understanding as of the date and year first above written. ."City" CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a California municipal corporation By: City Manager Approvedasto Form: City Attorney -. Oliver, Barr & Vose By: "Commission" CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS C0MMISSION By: Approved as to Form: Staff Counsel By: Executive Officer AMENDMENT TO OIL AND GAS LEASE NO. 2 This Amendment to the Oil and Gas Lease No. 2 (hereinafter the "Amendment") is entered into this _ day of , 1993, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City") and WINDWARD ASSOCIATES, a California limited partnership and GLG ENERGY, L.P., a limited partnership (hereinafter together the "Lessee"). RECITALS A. The City and Lessee have entered into that certain Oil and Gas Lease No. 2, dated January 14, 1992 (the "Lease") which provides for the lease of certain City lands for the extraction and removal of oil and gas deposits and as a drill site for such exploration and production of oil and gas. B. - In response to certain concerns raised by the State Lands Commission, the parties hereto desire toamend the Lease. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Section 1.h. shall be amended as follows: "h. Lessee's rights herein to prospect for, drill for, produce and take oil, gas .and other hydrocarbon substances from the leased lands and adjacent lands shall be to operate exclusively from the Drill Site or from another drill site located only in the uplands as approved by :a vote of the people. Lessee further agrees not to substantially interfere with the use of City property which is dedicated to parks, highways, streets, walks or public play -grounds." 2. The last sentence of Section 1.e. shall be amended as follows: "However, the city may allow others to conduct geological - or geophysical surveys on the leased lands in accordance with sections 6212.2 and 6826 of the Public Resources Code and applicable regulations of the city." 3. The last sentence of Section 4 shall be amended to read as follows: "Each monthly royalty. statement to City shall have attached copies of the most recently filed production statement by Lessees to the California State. Division of Oil and Gas, commonly known as for DOG 110 and shall further have attached "run tickets" for such month." 4. The second paragraph of Section 8.c. shall *be amended to read as follows: "For purposes of accounting hereunder, the quantity of oil produced and saved from the tidelands shall first be determined on the basis of gauges or meter readings prior to commingling and thereafter adjusted to conform to shipping tank measurements of the commingled oil." 5. The first sentence of Section 9.a. shall be amended to read as follows: "The Lessee may use oil produced from Lessee's wells drilled into the leased lands or adjacent lands for lease operations only and on a ratable basis between tidelands, uplands and other certain lands leased from private property owners." 6. A new sentence shall be inserted in Section 11 as the second sentence in said paragraph to read as follows: "Lessee's interest in the leased lands pursuant to this Lease maybe subject to property taxation and Lessee may. be subject to the payment of property taxes levied on such .interest." 7. The first paragraph of Subsection 12.g. shall be amended to read as follows: "g. The City and Lessee recognize that Lessee is a so called "common lessee" in that Lessee has lands under lease which are adjacent or are in close proximity to the leased lands and that within the .leased lands that 'City - owned uplands are adjacent and are in close proximity to the City tidelands. Furthermore, .City and Lessee recognize that this Lease -grants Lessee the right and Lessee intends to exercise the right to drill wells from the Drill Site to all such lands under lease to Lessee for oil and gas production. The City and Lessee have agreed that Lessee shall have the following obligations to drill protection wells to protect both the .leased lands and the tidelands therein from drainage, whether caused by Lessee's own producing operations on other.. lands or by producing operations conducted by others." 8. A new Subsection 12.g.(3) shall be inserted as follows: "g.(3) The obligation of Lessee to drill protection wells to protect the tidelands from drainage from City uplands shall be in accordance with subsection g.(2), above." 9. The first sentence of the first paragraph.. of Section. 16 shall be amended to read as follows: 2. "Subject to the requirements of Public Resources Code §6879 and §7061.1, City and Lessee may mutually determine to combine, pool - or unitize the leased lands with other lands not subject to this Lease and lying within the jurisdiction of the City...." 10. Section 18.d.(3) shall be amended to read as follows: "(3) The City shall contribute, after payout to city but in no event later than four (4) years from the commencement of City's receipt of royalty payments _.other than the Minimum Royalty, to the, Emergency Trust Fund the amount of five percent (5.0%) of net royalties received by City each month pursuant to the terms of this Lease, until such time as City's contribution, including the prorate accrued and compounded interest, reaches the amount of Two. Million Dollars ($2,000,000). For purposes of this Lease, "payout to City" shall mean the recovery by city of its costs in undertaking and entering into this Lease and "net royalties" shall mean royalties to City after -first paying the Advance and Additional Advance." 11. A new first paragraph to Section 20 shall be inserted to - read as follows: "Notwithstanding any provisionto the contrary in this Lease, the City and Lessee hereby agree that the cancellationand termination of this Lease shallbe governed and controlled by the terms and provisions of this Section, as follows:" 12. The last sentence in Subsection 24.b. shall be amended to read as follows: "b. The.. Lease on any segregated portion of the lands or zones or horizons shall continue in force for two (2) years after the date of City approval of the assignment and so long thereafter as oil or gas is produced in paying quantities from such segregated portion, but not to exceed thirty-five (35) years from the date of said City approval." 13. The last sentence :in subsection 24.c. shall be amended to read as follows: - "c. The Lease on any segregated portion containing only undeveloped lands or zones or horizons shall continue in force for two (2) years and so long thereafter asoil or gas is produced in paying quantities from such segregated portion, but not to exceed thirty-five (35) years from the date of said City approval." 3. -10— 14. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, all of the terms and provisions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect. 15. Each of the parties hereto represent and warrant that each has the legal power, right and authority to enter into and deliver this Amendment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to the Oil and Gas Lease No. 2 as of the date and year first above written. Approved asto form: City Attorney By: 4. "City" City of Hermosa Beach By: "Lessee" Windward Associates, a California limited partnership By: Macpherson oil Company, General Partner By: GLG Energy, L.P., a limited partnership By: OIL AND GAS LEASE AMENDMENTS Section 1. h shall add revised text. h. Lessee's rights herein to prospect for, drill for, produce and take oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances from the leased lands and adjacent lands shall be to operate exclusively from the Drill Site or from another drill site` located only in the uplands as approved by a vote of the people. Lessee further agrees not to substantially interfere with the use of City property which is dedicated to parks, highways, streets, walks or public play -grounds. Section 1. e However, the City may permit others to conduct geological or geophysical surveys on the leased lands as provided in sections 6212.2 and 6826 of the Public Resources Code and the applicable regulations of the City. Section 1. e shall be amended as follows: However, the City may allow others to conduct geological or geophysical surveys on the leased lands in accordance with sections 6212.2 and 6826 of the Public Resources Code and applicable regulations of the City. Section 4. Each monthly royality statement to City shall have attached copies of the most recently filed production statement by Lessee to the California State Division of Oil and Gas, commonly. known as for DOG 110. Section 4. shall be amended as follows: Each monthly royality statement to City shall have attached copies of the most recently filed production statement by Lessees to the California State Division of Oil and Gas, commonly known as for DOG 110 and shall further have attached "run tickets" for such month. Section 8. c For purposes of accounting hereunder, the quantity of oil produced and saved from the leased lands subject to this Lease shall be determined on the basis of gauges or meter readings and adjusted to conform to shipping tank measurements of the commingled oil. Section 8. c shall be amended as follows For purposes of accounting hereunder, the quantity of oil produced and saved from the tidelands shall first be determined on the basis of gauges or meter readings prior to commingling and thereafter adjusted to conform to shipping tank measurements of the commingled oil. Section 9. a The Lessee may use oil produced from Lessee's wells drilled into the leased lands or adjacent lands for lease operations only. Oil so used shall be reported to the City monthly. Such oil shall not be included in computing for royalty purposes the total production of oil removed or sold from the leased lands or adjacent lands during the month and the current market price of such production. Section 9. a shall be amended as follows: The Lessee may use oil produced from Lessee's wells drilled into the leased lands or adjacent lands for lease operations only and on a ratable basis between tidelands, uplands and other certain lands leased from private property owners. Section 11 Section 11 new sentence inserted: Lessee's interest in the leased lands pursuant to this Lease may be subject to property taxation and Lessee may be subject to the payment of property taxes levied on such interest. Section 12. g g. The City and Lessee recognize that Lessee is a so-called "common lessee" in that Lessee has lands under lease which are adjacent or are in close proximity to the leased lands, and this Lease grants Lessee the right and Lessee intends to exercise the right to drill wells from the Drill Site to such adjacent lands under lease to Lessee for oil and gas production. The City and Lessee have agreed that Lessee shall have the following obligations to drill protection wells to protect the leased lands from drainage, whether caused by Lessee's own producing operations on other lands or by producing operations conducted by others. Section 12. g shall be amended as follows: g. The City and Lessee recognize that Lessee is a socalled "common lessee" in that Lessee has lands under lease which are adjacent or are in close proximity to the leased lands and that within the leased lands that City -owned uplands are adjacent and are in close proximity to the City tidelands. Furthermore, City and Lessee recognize that this Lease grants Lessee the right and Lessee intends to exercise the right to drill wells from the Drill Site to all such lands -_ under lease to Lessee for oil and gas production. The City and Lessee have agreed that Lessee shall have the following obligations to drill protection wells to protect both the leased lands - and the tidelands therein from drainage, whether caused by Lessee's own producing operations on other lands or by producing operations conducted by others. Subsection 12. g Subsection 12. g (3) shall be inserted g. (3) The obligation of Lessee to drill protection wells to protect the tidelands from drainage from City uplands shall be in accordance with subsection q. (2), above. Section 16 Subject to the requirements of Public Resources Code 6879, City and Lessee may mutually determine to combine, pool or unitize the leased lands with other lands not subject to this Lease and lying within the jurisdiction of the City Section 16 shall be amended as follows: Subject to the requirements of Public Resources Code 6879 and 7061.1, City and Lessee may mutually determine to combine, pool or unitize the leased lands with other lands not subject to this Lease and lying within the jurisdiction of the City Section 18. d (3) The City shall contribute, after payout to City but in no event later than (4) years from the commencement of City's receipt of royalty payments other than the Minimum Royalty, to the Emergency Trust Fund the amount of five percent (5.0%) of net restricted royalties received by City each month pursuant to the terms of this Lease, until such time as City's contribution, including the prorata accrued and compounded interest, reaches the amount of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000). For purposes of this Lease "payout to City" -shall mean the recovery by City of its costs in undertaking and entering into this Lease and "net restricted royalties" shall mean restricted royalty to City after first paying the Advance and Additional Advance. Section 18. d (3) shall be amended as follows: The City shall contribute, after payout to City but in no event later than (4) years from the commencement of City's receipt of royalty payments other than the Minimum Royalty, to the Emergency Trust Fund the amount of five percent (5.0%) of net royalties received by City each month pursuant to the terms of this Lease, until such time as City's contribution, including the prorata accrued and compounded interest, reaches the amount of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000). Forpurposes of this Lease "payout to City" shall mean the recovery by City of its costs in undertaking and entering into this Lease and "net royalties" shall mean royalties to City after first paying the Advance and Additional Advance. Section 20 Section 20 shall be inserted as follows: Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this Lease, the City and Lessee hereby agree that the cancellation and termination of this Lease shall be governed and controlled by the terms and provisions of this Section, as follows: Subsection 24. b . . b. The Lease on any segregated portion of the lands or zones or horizons shall continue in force for two (2) years after the date of City approval of the assignment and so long thereafter as oil or gas is produced in paying quantities from such segregated portion. Subsection 24. b shall be amended as follows: b. The Lease on any segregated portion of the lands or zones or horizons shall continue in force for two (2) years after the date of City approval of the assignment and so long thereafter as oil or gas is produced in paying quantities from such . segregated portion, but not to exceed thirty-five (35) years from the date of said City approval. Subsection 24. c c. The Lease on any segregated portion containing only undeveloped lands or zones or horizons shall continue in force for two (2) years and so long thereafter as oil or gas is produced in paying quantities from such segregated portion. Subsection 24. c shall be amended as follows: c. The Lease on any segregated portion containing only undeveloped lands or zones or horizons shall continue in force for two (2) years and so long thereafter as oil or gas is produced in paying quantities from such segregated portion, but not to exceed thirty-five (35) years from the date of said City approval. 3 DEAL POINTS The following are the highlights of the lease agreement: 1. Minimum Return - $500,000 begins on 37th month after first well drilled; converts to 10% of land value for remaining lease after 144 months from first well drilled. At least $218,750 of minimum to be unrestricted funds. Lessee has agreement with school district to provide $.20 per barrel royalty. Land owners who own mineral rights also will receive royalties. 2. Temporary City Yard — Lessee pays $75,000 once all permits are received to pay for temporary relocation of City Yard. Additionally, City receives funds for rental of garage repair facilities, $15,000 of which can be used in advance of the required relocation. 3. Permanent City Yard - $21,000 for engineering study plus $500,000 for permanent yard as an advance. 4. Repayment of Advance - Paid first from restricted funds to the extent possible, but in no event from non -oil revenues. Oil Company to indemnify City from 50% of defense costs of lawsuit regarding the issue of use of unrestricted funds for reimbursement. The interest will be at prime, or 12%, whichever is lower. 5. Lease extension - 6 months after all approvals with.a 2 -year maximum. 6. Language of Royalty - Attorneys to resolve as long as drill site fee is 7% and mineral rights are 11 - 2/3%. 7. Computation of Royalties - Calculation of royalties to be based on the average posted price. 8. Advance Payment - only when required by state law. 9. Bonds - $100,000 for abandonment. 10. Priority for Tidelands Reimbursement - agree that each tidelands reimbursable dollar will be split 50/50 between City and operator. 11. Disclosures - Operator will provide in response to any reasonable request. 12. Trust Fund for Environmental Disaster - The fund amount would be six million dollars. The fund would mature over approximately a ten year period. Approximately one third of the fund, 2 million dollars", would be the City's share, and 4 million dollars would be Macpherson Oil Company's share -- 5% of net revenue. Accumulated interest would be included. A third party would oversee the fund. The City's $2 million will be restricted funds only, or will not be allocated. Four years after production phase starts payments to the fund would start, or at payout, recovery of development cost, whichever comes first. 13. Insurance - $3,000,000 is the minimum coverage. In the event that lessee is unable to obtain all or any type of required coverage, then Lessee shall be obligated to self -insure for such lack of coverage. Until such time as the Environmental Disaster Trust Fund reaches $4,000,000 of Lessee's contributions to said Fund, Lessee shall secure such self-insurance by delivering to the City either cash, a standby letter ofcredit or a security interest in an asset of Lessee with- the unencumbered, equivalent value ofthe self-insured amount. 14. Transfer of Lease/Other Partners - Additional partners, or lease transfers would require City review of financial statement. GLG, a partner, will be allowed to be noted as a co -lessee after City's review and approval of financial statement. 15. If toxics are found on site, the City will pay up to $50,000 to remove. If over that amount, the City may cancel lease, or the operator may pay the amount over $50,000. p/dealpoin QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON THE HERMOSA BEACH OIL DRILLING PROGRAM PREPARED BY CITY STAFF OCTOBER, 1991 1. How did the City get involved in the oil drilling effort? In 1984, voters lifted a 52 year ban on oil drilling by al- lowing drilling from the City Yard. A request for proposal process for upland drilling was conducted in 1986, which set the percentage of City revenues. The only bidder was Mac- pherson Oil Company, which also provided $100,000 as part of the bid. The City accepted the bid and signed a lease with Macpherson. The company has since signed lease agreements with property owners for mineral and pass through rights. One purpose of the City lease was to have the oil company pay for the environmental impact report, which is required before the state can approve tidelands drilling. The EIR was certified on May 8, 1990, and the proposed lease to use the Yard for drilling into both the uplands and tidelands was negotiated in 1990 and 1991. 2. What is the nature of the operation of oil drilling in Her- mosa Beach? The oil drilling has evolved to be all at the City Yard site at 6th and Valley in Hermosa Beach. Thirty wells will be drilled on a slant basis to recover oil from reservoirs underneath the City as well as underneath the tidelands which are held in trust by the City of Hermosa Beach. The facility will be walled, landscaped and sound protected. A draped tower will rise from the site to house the drilling rig. The oil will be piped from the facility to area refineries, reducing the truck traffic. The environmental review of this project requires that it be "an urban drill site", which will look nothing like a typi- cal oil field. A similar facility exists in Huntington Beach, and a display of pictures are available for viewing. 3. What revenues will the City get from this program? City revenues are those funds unrestricted by state law but restricted by a vote of the people of Hermosa Beach to be used for maintenance and improvement of open space in Hermo- sa Beach. Tidelands revenue is that revenue restricted by state law to improve the availability of the tidelands for the use of the state's population. The revenue estimates have a wide range. The most significant factors influencing revenues are the amount of oil and the price of oil. The conservative estimate is based on a City consultant's esti- mate of the oil field and stable prices. The optimistic estimate is based on deeper reservoirs and rising prices. Type of Reserve Conservative. Optimistic Estimate Estimate Unrestricted City revenues $13 million $49 million Tidelands revenues $11 million $43 million Total $24 million $92 million The City must receive at least $500,000 per year once in full operation, or 10% of the land value after 12 years. Millions of dollars would also be receivedby landowners in Hermosa Beach who would receive royalties for mineral and pass through rights from ownership of lands above the oil reserves. Also, the Hermosa Beach City School District will receive 20 cents per barrel from all oil produced under this program. Conservatively, this would result in approximately $2 million in revenue to the School District. 4. What negative environmental impacts are likely to be felt by our citizens? A very extensive Environmental Impact Report was certified on this project, and identified all potential noise, air pollution, vibration, settlement, and traffic impacts. Ex- tensive conditions exist to mitigate those impacts. The citizens will notice the 160 ft. tower that will store the oil rig,and the construction and maintenance will generate some traffic to and from the site. Noise, air pollution, vibration, settlement, and odors are expected to be nominal when all required conditions are in place. 5. How is the City protected from incurring additional liability? The oil company is required to provide $3 million of in- surance, as well as state required bonds. Insurance will list the City as an additional insured. Further, the City is requiring contributions to an environmental trust fund which eventually will accumulate from 5% of net proceeds. from both the oil company and the City's tidelands revenues. This fund is to grow until it reaches $6 million, and then will continue to grow from interest earnings. The City is also protected by the value of the oil field, and the assets of the oil company general partners, Macpherson Oil Company and GLG Energy, Inc. 6. What if hazardous wastes are found on the site? The City Yard site currently has fuel tanks on the site, and was formerly a construction dump site. As owner, the City is responsible for these items and any contaminated soil that may be found. If the City's cost to remediate contami- nated material exceeds $50,000, the oil company must pay or advance the additional amount or the City may opt to cancel the lease. 7. What will happen to the City Yard during the 35 years of oil production? During the testing phase, the oil company will advance $75,000 to relocate part of the yard, allow continued use of a portion of the current yard by City employees, and pay rent for additional facilities. The oil company also will immediately advance $21,000 to conduct an engineering study of the best available new site for a yard. The two sites being considered are the rear of the Community Center or the northeast corner of South School adjacent to Body Glove. City Yard operations no doubt will be disrupted during the testing phase until they are permanently relocated in new quarters, but the existing site is out of date and needed major refurbishment. 8. Does the City have any money at risk on this project? Not being a risk taking entrepreneurial enterprise, the City has attempted to reduce its risks. Of course, this would increase the risk to the oil company, and difficult negotia- tions were involved in order to work out a satisfactory ar- rangement for the degree of risk by both parties. The City has invested several hundred thousand dollars in staff time and attorneys' fees. It has kept accurate records of these costs, and hopes to get full reimbursement from future tide- lands revenues. 9. .What are the remaining hurdles to getting the oil drilling underway? The conditional use permit process, which places required conditions to mitigate negative environmental impacts, has yet to be accomplished. Most significantly, slant drilling into the tidelands, where a large reservoir of oil is expec- ted to be found, requires the approval of the State Lands Commission. The staff at the State Lands Commission is op- posed to this project and has created obstacles to receiving approval, so the City's application will require a large effort for success. In addition, the oil company must receive a variety of regulatory agency permits, many of which have expiration dates. This makes the timing of the whole operation very complicated. April 5, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of April 13, 1993 RECOMMENDATION TO FUND FOOT PATROL UNIT RECOMMENDATION: It is_recommended that City Council: 1. Authorize the funding of a foot patrol unit out of the Utility Users Tax to concentrate on enforcement issues on the beach, Strand, and Downtown area in conjunction with the elimination of the City's participation in the L. A. Impact Team. 2. Authorize the placement of signs on the Strand indicating that pedestrians have the right-of-way at all times. BACKGROUND: The Strand is a public right-of-way that transverses the westerly length of the city beach area. Since the surge of commercialism in the 70's and 80's, the beach and Strand have become more popu- lar. On a normal summer Sunday, 50,000 people or more are enjoy- ing Hermosa's greatest assets. That is three times the City population. When there are that many people, no matter what their makeup, crowd control is a priority. The Strand is safer than it was fifteen to twenty years ago when the drug culture and "bikers" existed. Today, the growing popularity of the bike path along the Strand has steadily swelled the crowds of locals and out-of-towners. The bicyclists, jog- gers, skateboarders, rollerbladers, and pedestrians are all com- peting and challenging for the same use of space. Add to this mixture, the growing element of gangs and the caldron begins to boil on a hot Summer's day. There is no single determinant for the Strand. Its use is based on the social trends of the times and the public activity during any of these times. The Police Department responds to these ac- tivities whether the activities are legal or illegal. ANALYSIS: The problem is policing the many different types of people who frequent the Strand area and the crime that comes with them. On any given day, the department fields, on average, 3 to 5 police officers for this entire town. Our officers get involved in a number of enforcement functions along the Strand. Attached is a listing of the types of cita- tions and arrests that have occurred on the Strand in the unit blocks just off the Strand 1992. During the summer months, we 1 12 generally assign officers to a foot patrol beat along the beach, Strand and Downtown area augmented with last summer's overtime cost, approximately $18,986. During the rest of the year calls for service and directed enforcement efforts are assigned to our regular patrol officers. However, it has always been difficult during this portion of the year to give the consistent attention needed along the Strand when these officers are also assigned to calls and other activities elsewhere in the City. We have found our efforts to be most effective when we have dedicated officers to the Strand and beach. As already mentioned, this has commonly been the function of our Summer Downtown Foot Patrol. They also monitor the walk zone when the lights are activated. They have proven to be very effective and enjoyed a great deal of support from the citizens andbusinessmen in this area. The of- ficers on beach patrol have reported a 90% compliance rate from the bicyclists. There is a posted speed of 10 mph on the Strand for bicycle riders. However, bicycle riders can exceed this speed limit without even realizing it, for how would one know if they were traveling 8 mph or 13 mph. The department currently has one ra- dar gun that can measure this lower speed. There is a new, more accurate radar gun on the market that is safe to use and that is the laser gun. The cost of the new laser gun is $5,500. Sections 5-24.5(d) and (e) grants police officers the ability to cite bike riders who are traveling at speeds unsafe for condi- tions (which can be less than 10 mph), reckless driving, and trick riding. There are certainly times when it is reasonable and safe for a bike rider to travel 10-15 mph on a day in February, while 7 mph may be unsafe on a Saturday in August. Section 5-245(b) requires all persons operating any wheeled devices to yield the right-of-way to pedestrians. There are many who use the Strand that are unaware of this condition. We may post signs that indicate that pedestrians have the right-of-way to all wheeled vehicles. Safety problems on the Strand would be negligible if current laws were strictly enforced. It is a recommended patrol practice for each beat car to travel the major streets at the beginning and end of their shifts. This includes the Strand. The mere presence of a police car on the Strand engages a public awareness that there is a police presence and commonly solicits an acknowledging, friendly wave from the Strand residents. If the police vehicle interferes with the public use of the Strand and there is no emergency present, the officers refrain from driving on the Strand. As each summertime approaches, officers are reminded to avoid driving on the Strand during congested time periods. At the beginning of the Fiscal Year 1992-93, a budget was devel- oped for a Sergeant and two officers to be assigned full time as the Downtown Foot Patrol. This was to be funded out of the Utility Users Tax. When the Utility Users Tax was created, part of that tax was to provide foot patrol services in the downtown area. If the quality of life issues mentioned in this report are of concern to the citizens of Hermosa Beach, I recommend that we establish this unit on a full-time basis and fund it out of the UUT. I see no better alternative than to dedicate officers having as their primary responsibility the enforcement issues that are of concern on the Strand, beach, and the Downtown area. BUDGET IMPLICATIONS: The City is currently funding (3) positions, a Sergeant and two Officers, out of the Asset Forfeiture Fund to work at the L.A. Impact Team headquarters in the City of El Segundo. This regional drug task force works major drug related cases and seizures. Although highly successful in the beginning three years, there has been a steady decline this last year, both in major cases and asset seizures. The transportation of illicit drugs and money has dramatically changed as the dealers have be- come wiser and more ingenious. Also, more police agencies have joined the L.A. Impact Team. Originally, there were only eight members. Currently, there are seventy four members and each member receives one percent of the total asset seizure. This translates into a future drastic de- cline per member's share. The Asset Seizure/Forfeiture Fund has a projected revenue of $275,306 for this Fiscal Year. The total expenditure for Special Investigations is $666,337. $175,592 of which was earmarked for equipment purchases for the department. The cost of funding the Special Investigations budget is a little less than double their revenue. It is recommended that Council approve the return of these posi- tions to be utilized as a Downtown/Strand Foot Patrol Unit funded from the Utility Users Tax Fund. This new foot patrol unit would have an immediate direct positive effect on the Downtown/Strand safety issues. The unit would pro- vide a community based policing program in the most critical areas of our city. The increased Police presence would assist in revitalizing the Downtown/Strand area by making more visible a major untapped resource, Public Safety. Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Noted for fiscal impact: Respe 11 A dub/fid, Val raser, Acting Chief of Police V. Copeland, Finance Director HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT ARREST AND CITATIONS ISSUED 1992 ON THE STRAND AND IN THE UNIT BLOCKS OFFENSE PERSONS ARRESTED Attempted Murder 1 Rape 1 Attempted Rape 1 Felony Narcotics Violations 7 Other Felony Arrests 5 Drunk in Public 28 Drunk Driving 7 Other Misdemeanor Arrests 16 Total 66 OFFENSE PERSONS CITED Open Alcohol Container on Beach/Strand 63 Drinking in Public 16 Motorized Veh. on Strand 13 Violation of Walk Zone 7 Other Municipal Code Violations 7 Vehicle Code Violations 42 Possessions of Marijuana 16 Other Code Violations (B&P, P.C.) 5 Total 169 ANALYSIS: Proposed budget for Foot Patrol Unit. 4100 Personal Services Budget Request 4102 Regular Salaries/Safety (1 Sgt., 2 Officers) $143,352 4107 Overtime 35,000 4109 Court Time 2,000 4110-4111 Vac./Accrual Cash -In 5,734 4114 Police Reserves 2,000 4185 Uniforms 4.200 $192,286 4201 Contract Services Private 2,400 4307 Radio Maintenance 2,000 4309 Maintenance Materials 3,200 4310 Motor Fuels and Lubes 1,200 4311 Auto Maintenance 1,200 4316 Training 2.000 $ 9,600 5401 Equipment - Less than $500 750 5402 Equipment - More than $500 (Includes New Laser Radar Gun @ $5000) 7,000 5403 Vehides (Bicycles) 1.400 $ 9,150 6900 Lease Payments (New Beath Vehicle) 4.800 Grand Total $ 218,236 NOTE: This budget is representative of a budget for a Foot Patrol Unit. The numbers would be refined during the budget process 3 56x1 April 5, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 13, 1993 SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL AREA EXPRESS WAX)COMMUTER PROGRAM INITIATED BY PLANNING STAFF PURPOSE: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO WITHDRAW FROM THE MAX PROGRAM Recommendation: Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution to delete MAX Line #1 (Beach Cities). Background: On April 5, 1993, the MAX Policy Steering Committee voted to delete Line #1 (Beach Cities) effective May 3, 1993. This decision was based on Redondo Beach's City Council decision to withdraw from MAX. On December 16, 1992, the Redondo Beach City Council voted to withdraw from the MAX program. On March 9, 1993, Redondo Beach's City Council was asked to reconsider and again voted to withdraw from MAX. Analysis: Line #1 has had persistently low ridership since service was started in April 1990. - Despite aggressive marketing and two route changes, ridership has not improved. With Redondo Beach leaving the program, taking approximately 66% of the ridership of Line #1, Manhattan Beach and Hermosa Beach support the Policy Steering Committee's decision to drop Line #1. Imaact: The fiscal impact to the City is positive. For Fiscal Year 92-93, Hermosa Beach contributed approximately $18,356 of Proposition A monies to the MAX program. It is estimated that Fiscal Year 93-94 appropriations will be approximately the same. These appropriations that would have been spent on the MAX program can be budgeted for resale to another city for approximately $9,500 to the General Fund. Michael Schubach Planning Director Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Attachments: 1. Resolution 93 - Lindsay L. IHirsh Planning Aide COVER 14b 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • RESOLUTION 93- • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, - CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A RESOLUTION TO WITHDRAWFROM PARTICIPATION IN THE MUNICIPAL AREA EXPRESS (MAX) PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, Californiaheld a meeting on April 13, 1993 regarding this matter and made the following findings: A. Despite an agressive marketing program, MAX line 1, the Beach Cities Route, continues to operate with low ridership; B. Dropping Line 1 results in the best overall productivity of the MAX service; C. While a coordinated regional transportation system can play a significant part in an attempt to reach congestion management and air quality goals, the money contributed to the MAX program can be better spent on regional transportation programs that are more fiscally responsible. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT the City withdraw from the Municipal Area Express (MAX) program. • PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13th day of April, 1993 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CFFYUOINEy